Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Packets - Historic Preservation Commission (97)
AGENDA Oro Valley Historic Preservation Commission Monday, March 10, 2008 Town of Oro Valley Council Chambers 11000 N. La Canada Drive I. Call to Order: at of after 5:00 p.m. II. Roll Call. III. Call to the Audience. IV. Approval of February 11, 2008 minutes. V. Discussion and possible action regarding Steam Pump Ranch: the Master Planning process and the future of the property. a. Update on Task Force progress b. Process for Historic Designation for Steam Pump Ranch VI. Discussion and possible action regarding HPC Work Plan: a. CLG Application b. Cultural Resource Inventory Plan c. Budget d. Community Outreach e. Process Plan for Historic Designation f. Role of the HPC g. Training VII. Discussion and possible action regarding HPC special projects: a. National Alliance of Historic Commission b. HPC Rules c. Santa Cruz Heritage Alliance VIII. Discussion and possible action of status regarding current vacancy on HPC. IX. Discussion and possible action regarding site tour to Honey Bee Archaeological Preserve. X. Announcements. XI. Items for future agendas. XII. Adjourn. \\Comdev\pzl\PROJECTS\Historic Preservation Cornmission\agendas\2008 Posted: 03 05 08 3:00 p.m. cp The Town of Oro Valley complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If any person(s) with a disability needs any type of accommodation, please notify the Town Clerk's office at (520) 229-4700. INSTRUCTIONS TO SPEAKERS Members of the public have the right to speak during any posted public hearing. However, those items not listed as a public hearing are for consideration and action by the Commission during the course of their business meeting. Members of the public may be allowed to speak on these topics at the discretion of the Chair. If you wish to address the Commission on any item(s)on this agenda, please complete a speaker card located on the Agenda table at the back of the room and give it to the Recording Secretary, Please indicate on the speaker card which item number and topic you wish to speak on, or if you wish to speak during "Call to Audience", please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. Please step forward to the podium when the Chair announces the item(s) on the agenda which you are interested in addressing. 1. For the record, please state your name and whether or not you are a Town resident... 2. Speak only on the issue currently being discussed by Commission. Please organize your speech, you will only be allowed to address the Commission once regarding the topic being discussed. 3. Please limit your comments to 3 minutes. 4. During"Call to Audience"you may address the Commission on any issue you wish. 5.Any member of the public speaking must speak in a courteous and respectful manner to those present. Thank you for your cooperation. "Notice of Possible Quorum of the Oro Valley Town Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission: In accordance with Chapter 3, Title 38,Arizona Revised Statutes and Section 2-4-2 of the Oro Valley Town Code, a majority of the Town Council or Commission may attend the above referenced meeting as a member of the audience only." \\Comdev\pzl\PROJECTS\Historic Preservation Commission\agendas\2008 031008 Approved Minutes Historic Preservation Commission meeting APPROVED MINUTES ORO VALLEY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING March 10, 2008 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE I. Call to Order: at of after 5:02 p.m. II. Roll Call. PRESENT: Chair Bob Baughman Vice Chair Salette Latas Commissioner Daniel Zwiener Commissioner Pat Spoerl Commissioner Marilyn Cook Commissioner Lois Nagy Also Present: Al Kunisch. Town of Oro Valley Vice Mayor and HPC Liaison Pamela Pelletier, Planner Bill Adler, Planning and Zoning Commissioner Dick Eggerding, Oro Valley Historical Society III. Call to the Audience. Dick Eggerding, President of the Oro Valley Historical Society (OVHS), stated that the OVHS would like to see a closer relationship between OVHS and the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC). OVHS is a separate organization, not repeat organization. A joint study session to look at opportunities to support each other would be beneficial. The organizations should work together. Mr. Eggerding also announced the OVHS annual meeting is on March, 20, 2008, at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers. Jay Van Orden, Tucson, will give a presentation on Geronimo's surrender. Mr. Eggerding invited the HPC to attend a book signing program April 10, 2008, at the El Conquistador Golf Club, for a book Commissioner Spoerl was involved in the development of, by Barbara Marriott and OVHS called "Images of America, Oro Valley". It is a pictorial history of the Oro Valley area. IV. Approval of February 11, 2008 minutes. MOTION: Commissioner Zwiener MOVED to approve the February 11, 2008, HPC minutes with the following correction: the spelling of his name from Zweiner to Zwiener. Vice Chair Latas seconded the motion. Motion carried 1 031008 Approved Minutes Historic Preservation Commission meeting with the correction, 6:0. V. Discussion and possible action regarding Steam Pump Ranch: the Master Planning process and the future of the property. Bill Adler, Oro Valley resident and member of the Steam Pump Ranch Task Force, asked to speak on this item. Mr. Adler pointed out that the Task Force may not be able to resolve at what point the park is to be opened. HPC may have to make a recommendation on this issue. The Task Force seems to be divided on when to open regarding which educational and cultural items may be available. This item should be g g scheduled for a future HPC agenda to discuss the differences of when to open, so HPC can make a recommendation. A concensus point of view of when SPR should be open to the public should be forwarded to the Town Council. a. Update on Task Force progress Commissioner Spoerl gave an update on where the Task Force is at this time. Mr. Adler's statement was accurate on concensus being reached on the first phase of development, the physical features of the property and a general idea of phasing of development. When and where funding will come from is still in question. There will be one more Task Force meeting and the primary topic will be the issue of when SPR will be open. Mrs. Pelletier stated that a date has not yet been set for the next Task Force meeting. The HPC will be notified as soon as a date is known. Mrs. Pelletier said that May 7, 2008, is a tentative date for the Task Force report to go to Council. It is dependent upon the consultant completing his report, which may take about 6 weeks, and upon when HPC makes a recommendation after receipt of the report. The Task Force has decided to make recommendation on the physical plans, the Phase 1 and the buildout, as well as looking at the draft report from the consultant. Chair Baughman said that if the consultant's report is available within a week in advance of the April 14 HPC meeting, that it should be an agenda item. If not a special meeting will be scheduled to review the report. Commissioner Zwiener accompanied staff to the Pima County bond advisory meeting last Friday and was able to give his own opinion on process by which the Task Force and the consultant are arriving at their results. b. Process for Historic Designation for Steam Pump Ranch Chair Baughman has not been able to format the form so staff will have to type it. Mrs. Pelletier gave an update on the Historic Designation process. 1 . The Master Plan for SPR needs to be finished, approved by Town Council, 2 031008 Approved Minutes Historic Preservation Commission meeting hopefully in May, and approved by the Board of Supervisors, possibly this summer. We p Y Y pp cannot officially proceed until after the Master Plan is approved. Meanwhile we are working on other things, i.e., creating an historic district for SPR. SPR will be the first site to be designate and will set the process to use for all future sites. 2. Rezoning of the site to an historic district and the historic designation process through the Historic Designation Commission can be done concurrently. 3. We also can put together a working group: Planning and Zoning, Legal Department, and an HPC Commissioner to work on creating the historic district. Work can begin on the Historic Designation process now. Application has already been sent for the Town to join the National Association of Preservation Alliance. We are waiting for email confirmation. There was extensive discussion on extending the lease to the Liebers. Several buildings have deteriorated significantly over the last year. The Liebers have ask for the extension and Town is in negotiations with them. All personal property is the Liebers. Council makes the final decision for extending the lease or not. The Town owns the property and is responsible for repairs. Mrs. Pelletier stated that since this is not an agenda item, the HPC should not be discussing. Commissioner Spoerl said it does fall under the National Historic Preservation Act. Town should initiate formal consultation with State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) on potential effects. Mrs. Pelletier interrupted to say she has been directed that this item isn't on the agenda and it should not be discussed. Council will be going into Executive Session next Wednesday, March 19, on this item. Chair Baughman felt this issue is important and needs to be discussed, possibly in a study session. Staff would have to check for room availability Monday of next week for a special meeting to discuss the Lieber lease.. Commissioner Zwiener would like clarification as to what role the contents of buildings have in negotiation with the Liebers. Are any provisions being made for removal of the contents? Chair Baughman called for a special meeting for study of the Lieber lease. 3 031008 Approved Minutes Historic Preservation Commission meeting VI. Discussion and possible action regarding HPC Work Plan: a. CLG Application The CLG application is on the consent agenda for Council for March 19, 2008. b. Cultural Resource Inventory Plan Commissioner Spoerl showed examples of maps for Cultural Resource Inventory pg may planning. These help in determining what level of mapping HPC wants to do and Y tog et information from Town staff as to what maps are available or may be obtained. Legal needs to be checked with to see what the policy for confidentiality is regarding archaeological sites. This should be put on the next agenda and Commissioner Spoerl was asked to bring the maps back for further review. Mrs. Pelletier reminded the Commissioners that the personal property belongs to the Liebers. The only way it would become Town property is if the Liebers decided to donate it. HPC may start with a preliminary inventory, and then specifically SPR as either the first item on the inventory or the last. c. Budget A budget handout was distributed. Chair Baughman said if there were any questions they should contact Mrs. Pelletier. Mrs. Pelletier stated that a registration fee for AZSITE is not on the handout. Staff is working on contacting Pima County Cultural Resources to see if the Town could "piggy-back" with them. Pima County pays around $13,000 per year. d. Community Outreach - No report. e. Process Plan for Historic Designation - Forms are to be typed. f. Role of the HPC Vice Chair Latas handed out a purpose statement rewritten as a role statement. This is from the HPC code. Chair Baughman said the Commission is a collective body, which exists and can act only when in a formal meeting. This should cover the role of commission and commissioners. Vice Chair Latas commented that she found a copy of Riggins Rules. Staff was asked to scan Riggins Rules and send to HPC members. 4 031008 Approved Minutes Historic Preservation Commission meeting g. Training Mrs. Pelletier said Debby Abele, City of Scottsdale Historic Preservation Officer, was asked to do a training session for HPC. April 29, 2008, has been reserved for Ms. Able to come to Oro Valley. We will be working through lunch. Ms. Chapman will send out an email with details. Chair Baughman asked that others be invited: Town Council, Planning and Zoning Commission and Parks and Recreation Board. Mrs. Pelletier said this is specific for HPC and she would like to discuss inviting others with Planning and Zoning Director More. HPC forwarded their Rules on to Council some time ago. Council indicated they wanted to have a study session for the Rules. We are still waiting to get on a study session agenda. We are working with the Mayor to get scheduled soon, so we can get the Rules approved. VII. Discussion and possible action regarding HPC special projects: a. National Alliance of Historic Commission - item covered previously in meetting b. HPC Rules - item covered previously in meeting. c. Santa Cruz Heritage Alliance - there was no meeting this month. VIII. Discussion and possible action of status regarding current vacancy on HPC. Vice Mayor Kunisch said the he and the Mayor would be talking to Commissioner Spoerl regarding being the Town Historian on a temporary basis. Town Clerk, Kathi Cuvelier has indicated she would be willing to be the Town Historian after she retires. Council want to take care of historian position first and then take care of other seat vacancy. Chair Baughman said HPC recommended that the vacant seat not be ex officio. Vice Mayor Kunisch said the Mayor and he would like to have all seven members as voting members. The Town Historian would be a member and have all rights. It was pointed out that ex officio members cannot be reprimanded if misbehaved. Another concern was if a member not longer resides in Oro Valley, they should resign their seat. Mrs. Cuvelier does not reside in the Town. Vice-Mayor Kunisch referred back to the Lieber's lease and said it is under the Council's pervue. Discussion on this issue would be inappropriate. This will go to executive session on March 19. A study session is inappropriate and not necessary. Council will 5 031008 Approved Minutes Historic Preservation Commission meeting be looking at the lease with Legal. Chair Baughman said SPR is historic property and therefore HPC should have some say in this. IX. Discussion and possible action regarding site tour to Honey Bee Archaeological Preserve. A Honey Bee site tour is planned for Thursday, 3/13, meeting at 9:45 a.m. at the Town. All members with the possible exception of Commissioner Cook plan to attend. The tour has been noticed. X. Announcements. - April 29: Training - Next week: SPR next meetings. - At the Pima County Bond committee meeting a member commented on the number of people from Oro Valley. Corkey Poster also attended the meeting and spoke about SPR. XI. Items for future agendas. - Meeting on lease: Vice Chair Latas thinks it is an important part of our purpose to discuss the preservation on a historic property. Mrs. Pelletier will send an email out and call Commissioner Cook. Vice Mayor Kunisch and Legal should be invited. Legal needs to attend this meeting. - Discussion regarding liaison with OVHS. XII. Adjourn. MOTION: Vice Chair Latas MOVED to adjourn the HPC meeting. Commissioner Cook seconded the motion. Motion carried 6:0. Meeting adjourned at 6:20 p.m. Prepared by: Diane Chapman Senior Office Specialist 6 DRAFT MINUTES ORO VALLEY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING February 11, 2008 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE I. Call to Order: at or after 5:00 p.m. II. Roll Call. PRESENT: Chair Bob Baughman Vice Chair Salette Latas Commissioner Daniel Zv(elier Commissioner Pat Spoerl Commissioner Marilyn Cook Commissioner Lois Nagy Also Present: Paul Loomis, Mayor Al Kunisch, Town Council Vice Mayor & HPC Council Representative Pamela Pelletier, Planner Lexa Mack, Town Civil Attorney Diane Chapman, Senior Office Specialist III. Call to the Audience. Opened and closed at 5:03 p.m. with no speakers. IV. Approval of January 14, 2008, minutes: Vice Chair Latas pointed out that on page 3, paragraph 4, there are two places where it talks about funding, the $2 should be changed to $2 million. MOTION: Commissioner Cook MOVED to approve the January 14, 2008, HPC minutes with the correction of$2 to $2 million dollars on page 3, paragraph 4. Commissioner ZvOliner seconded the motion. Motion carried 6:0. V. Discussion and possible action regarding Steam Pump Ranch: the Master Planning process and the future of the property. a) Presentation by Corky Poster of Poster Frost Associates on the status of Steam Pump Ranch (SPR). The Task Force is close to consensus on the physical content of the Master Plan (MP). The major themes of the two key phases will be the Pusch and Procter-Lieber eras, with interpretations on both eras. They are comfortable with which buildings are to 2/11/08 Draft HPC Minutes be restored. First phase will have no new buildings. The entry will be at the north end of the site. The Farmer's Market may be moved to Phase 1. Build-out phase may have a future events center and equestrian stop station. Both the public and Task Force had issues with having horses because of flies. Parking is resolved. Outstanding issues: What other partners may come into the site. The operational approach to site and how it is to be managed. Economic consultants described 4 operational scenarios: 1. Non-profit Heritage Model in which the Historical Society does everything. 2. Public Heritage Model which says it is Oro Valley Town property and general management should come from Town resources and staff. 3. Heritage with Support of Commercial Uses Model would increase the role of private lessors or vendors to take more responsibility for management of the site. 4. Preservation Model, nobody runs exhibits within building; it may all be outside. The net operating cost of the 4 models range from a negative cost to the Town of $218,000 for Preservation Model to a high of$324,000 for the Public Heritage Model. The Commercial Model would have more income, but also more cost. These models may not be 4 separate choices, but stages in an evolving program. Mr. Frost hopes to get direction from HPC and Town Council and go back to the Task Force to pick a preferred final plan. Questions and comments from Commissioners: - What 2 or 3 issues have divided the Task Force the most? Response: Restaurant - cafe vending machine. Animals on site. Extent of economic sustainability. Role of outside agencies on the site, i.e. GOVAC and the Chamber of Commerce. - What elements in the MP are the strongest to attract people's repeat visits to the site? Response: Success will be based on programs such as a Farmer's Market, the park, events in the open space, ongoing activities and ancillary uses. - Are you satisfied with people doing rehabilitation of buildings so as to not severely impact the buildings? Response: There are 3 or 4 satisfactory companies in Town that can do the work. There are some solutions that will take maintenance. Raw adobe is difficult to maintain. Buildings from the 30's are not as much of a problem. - Is the intention that this part of the Master Plan process will address each structure and what type of work is needed? Response: The Steam Pump is between restoration and reconstruction. Pusch house is restoration. Proctor-Lieber house is a combination of restoration and reconstruction. All other buildings will be getting rehabilitation. - What does Poster Frost want from HPC this evening? Response: Feedback on the models as a evolving process instead of 4 separate models. Feedback on the accuracy of whether we have a strong consensus on the physical Master Plan and did we characterize the disagreements accurately. - Would like more discussion on the non-physical aspect of the programs. - Is there any indication as to when the park may open? 2 2/11/08 Draft HPC Minutes Response: The Task Force wants to open when the site is ready. There are liability issues to be considered. - The plan should evolve to bring people back. There should be cultural and educational events geared to children. b) Development of Criteria for evaluating the Master Plan Criteria for evaluating the master plan were discussed and it was decided that a study session would be beneficial after HPC received the Task Force report. If the report is received in time to schedule an available conference room, the Study Session may be independent of the regular HPC meeting. The Study Session will be for more informality, creativity and brainstorming. The Commissioners felt the criteria listed in the material packet were thorough. Chair Baughman thought #5 should be excluded as it is one of the things HPC will be judging. MOTION: Commissioner Z er MOVED that HPC approve the criteria for evaluation of Steam Pump Ranch Master Plan based on the following: the IGA, Secretary of Interior Standards, the Oro Valley General Plan, and the Historic Preservation Ordinance. Commissioner Nagy seconded the motion. Motion carried 6:0. Mrs. Pelletier will email pdf files of the documents listed in the motion to the Commissioners next week, and will mail the information to Commissioner Cook. Commissioner Spoerl said at the last HPC meeting there was an approved motion to start the process for historic designation for Steam Pump Ranch and wanted to know the status. Mrs. Mack said nothing has happened yet. She will get with Ms. More on this to see if an historic district zone could be developed concurrently with the application. Chair Baughman asked Vice Mayor Kunisch to find out what is happening regarding the current vacancy on the Commission. VI. Discussion and possible action regarding HPC Work Plan a) CLG Application CLG application was distributed as part of the packet. Comments of Commissioners: - The packet is complete and has background information. - The checklist should be dated and have a checkmark by every item. - Under Item 1, "A list of accompanying maps of areas", make a notation that the Town uses AZSITE database for their official survey information. 3 2/11/08 Draft HPC Minutes - Under Item 3, "If a field is not represented", note that the Town has a good history of hiring consultants for specific expertise. - Under Item 3, last item, add a note regarding the Town Historian vacancy. MOTION: Commissioner Nagy MOVED that HPC accept the CLG packet as presented with corrections as noted and be sent on to the Major with a recommendation that it be signed and sent to the State Historic Preservation Office. Vice Chair Latas seconded the motion. Motion carried 6:0. Mrs. Pelletier said regarding AZSITE application, Town of Oro Valley has no archeologist and there are cost issues. She is working with Linda Mayro to get data for our use, investigate how to apply and the level of service needed. b) Cultural Resource Inventory Plan Commissioners Nagy and Spoerl have divided up responsibilities for the Cultural Resource Inventory Plan. Commissioner Nagy will do physical research and Commissioner Spoerl will be formatting data. There are 12 historical properties listed in the packet. They will report to HPC when they have information. The research will tell what is in Oro Valley and what will help the Oro Valley story. Commissioner Spoerl pointed out that Kelly Ranch is in Pima County, but is within the Oro Valley planning area in the General Plan. It was supported by Oro Valley for open space acquisition. Mrs. Pelletier suggested listing the properties as those within the Oro Valley Town limits, and those within the Oro Valley Planning limits. Commissioner Zweiner suggested that in the future historical and archeological sites should be in the survey. Vice Chair Latas said the National Preservation Act defines an historical resource or property as any prehistoric or historic district site building structure. It is in both the local ordinance and the national act. Mrs. Pelletier said we have not yet joined the National Alliance of Historic Commission. It is being included in the budget for the next year. Also, $30,000 to $50,000 for full survey is in the budget as a place holder. It may or may not be approved. She will look into whether the membership can be out of this year's budget and report back to HPC this next week. Mrs. Pelletier reported that budget is in the process for next FY which entails several months' process. There is a budget for training, but she didn't know the amount. She is working to coordinating with Debby Able to provide some training. 4 2/11/08 Draft HPC Minutes Chair Baughman would like to have a 6 h3ir training session, getting the costs, where, etc. Mrs. Pelletier and Commissioner Z€i er will meet to set this up. Mrs. Pelletier said the SPR Operation and Maintenance budget is under Parks and Rec and Public Works. Staff is asking Finance to allocate Planning and Zoning a $300,000 place holder for rehabilitation and restoration of the Steam Pump building. Commissioner Zv019,er suggested a future discussion on what HPC training needs are in general. The Obspective trainer may be able to suggest ideas. Commissioner Cook met with Scott Nelson on public outreach. The flyer on the history of Oro Valley might be expanded. There is a disadvantage in doing a lot of outreach at this time as SPR and Honey Bee Preserve archeological site are not yet open for pubic view. A topic for outreach may be HPC itself. Vice Chair Latas has not yet defined the role of the commission. She is working on the high level draft of the Work Plan. Chair Baughman has gathered sample application forms and stated that staff has volunteered to type them into the system. VII. Discussion and possible action regarding site tour to Honey Bee Archaeological Preserve. Staff is working with the Communications Coordinator for a site tour date. When confirmed we will make the announcement. Per Chair Baughman request, Mrs. Pelletier will ask if HPC could get a separate tour. Mrs. Pelletier will also check to see if we can get an electronic copy of the Desert Archeology report on Honey Bee Archaeological Preserve. VIII. Announcements. - May have HPC rules to Town Council in March. - Wednesday, 2/13/08, Town Council Study Session, Poster Frost will give an update at 5:30 on Steam Pump Ranch. - Wednesday, 2/13/08, is the deadline to respond to Diane Chapman or Pamela Pelletier for the 2/20 U of A event whether you want to carpool. - 2/20 SPR Task Force at 3 pm. - 2/28 in the afternoon there will be 3 hours board and commission training in the Council Chambers put on by the Arizona Department of Commerce. - There will be another SPR Task Force meeting on 3/6, Thursday, at 3:00 pm in the Kachina Room. - The next HPC meeting is 3/10/08 at 5 pm. 5 2/11/08 Draft HPC Minutes - Vice Chair Latas reported that she attended another Santa Cruz Heritage Alliance meeting a week ago. They go beyond historic resources into cultural resources. They will hold a local food festival later on this spring. A business directory of businesses for Santa Cruz Valley is being produced that will help promote historic tourism. - The bill regarding designation is in the Senate now with five other cultural areas. Our senators have not signed on as co-sponsor, so we are depending on senators from other states promoting it. IX. Items for future agendas. - Report on the role of the HPC. - All of the Work Plan items listed separately on the agenda so a report can be given and discussed if it comes up. - Application for historic designation for SPR/ historic district zone. X. Adjourn. MOTION: Vice Chair Latas MOVED to aZnthe Historic Preservation Commission meeting. Commissioner Z e r seconded the motion. Motion carried 6:0. The meeting closed at 6:55 p.m. Prepared by: Diane Chapman, Senior Office Specialist 6 writef Apr; I 2 ? Proposed Training Session for the Oro Valley Historic Preservation Commission 9:00 a.m. Preservation Basics • Overview of the Framework of Public Preservation • The Legal Basis of Municipal HP programs • Using your Local HP Ordinance/Role of By-laws 10:30 a.m. Break 10:45 a.m. I-1PC's Primary Work Responsibilities • Survey • Designation • Protection 12:30 p.m. Working Lunch (Discussion among HPC members and staff) • Goals for the HPC's accomplishments in the year ahead • Issues • Partnership Opportunities 1:30 p.m., Wrap Up — How to be Successful! • Annual Work Program Planning • Gaining Community Support for HP Program's Efforts • Navigating the Political World 2:15 p.m. Adjourn • © to in o - ., '.��. . 0 r--, N �, N 0 0 O 0 Ose- E' Q.) c' .1 Q <4 < <C 1 in in o o O -44 N o O O ~v co cn in -1, r+ 69- 99 ciD t Q t CA a o Cr) 0 0 o m (7) c) c) c• c) c4 o) 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 , 0 O 0 O 0 0 o O 0 0 0 0 0 �+ N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 L.o in o •0 CO 0 0 nuc\' VD- in O 0 o co O 0 a o ci) 0 cN O►r� 0 =•1 N fa O o o o 69- o 09- 69- a) fa, se° in N 64 v Ct c O 00 00 00 CO GU 00 00 00 CA CLO OBJ 00 � o) O a O o o 0 o O o 0 0 O O -+ 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 O O o i-'., N N N N Gni Gni N N N c i i N N 10 '4-4 N 4) .cu Go C .....:-S•i: ,---i ., 4) in - Z ,CD 0C Z CD CD CD CZ .+.� $4 C a•' 0 a) E co Z 0 � 0 ' io 0 a) 0 '� c v--1 . <C <4 <4 oCD q +1) N ;� r"4 = o Z Z 0 Z Z 0 0 ° CD 41 Cd U cn 14 CL 0 ° 0 �-' o .O •• +, ap al w Pk o U cp .. Q a •� �H + • F: 0 . V � 0 C • ^ j -P+� CD C3 0 OA 0 8R 2 8 'Jo . ID • •.� ago a a o �, +a •,0 •5 104 0 U cI9 Td '-' •,-. `� •� v •+' cZ >. +, `a) Z a, �., a) 0 ,,,,,, o CD CM 71 4&1) 4 .4:im 5 4‘' .1.1 1 a E 0 cu +a X/ Cid 0 0 c f.4E-+ Z UZ � a 4Q v W a o Z Q c I Oro Valley Historic Preservation Commission Purpose The Oro Valley Historic Preservation Commission promotes the protection, enhancement, and perpetuation of properties, areas, documents, and artifacts of historic, cultural, archaeological, and aesthetic significance as being necessary for the economic, cultural, educational, and general welfare of the public by: 1. Identifying and preserving the historic properties that represent distinctive elements of Oro Valley's historic, archaeological,architectural, and cultural heritage;maintaining and fostering their unique identities. 2. Promoting the use of historic properties for the education, pleasure, and welfare of the people of the Town. 3. Fostering civic pride in the accomplishments of the past. 4. Protecting and enhancing Oro Valley's attractiveness to visitors, in order to support and stimulate the economy. 5. Stabilizing and improving property values of rehabilitated and protected sites. 6. Providing incentives for restoration by owners of landmarks or historic properties. 7. Providing standards for restoration of designated properties and for new construction within Historic Districts. ' • Arizona State Parks Preservation Heritage Fund Historic Preservation Grant Application Town of Oro Valley :••••„,,,,,,,.,„,,,„,„ ,,„... ...,•,.. .„,,,,,,,„,,,,„„5,. .:•.„::••••:......„ ,..•:..):::.K.„,„ : ,::„.„:: • .. H:,,.,,„,.„„„,,,,,., ., . • ............,,,,...:.......„,..:•:•• • • ..•.,:.,,,,.......„:•••. .„..:...:..,„,.........• .... • ,•. • ,,.........„..•• ....•,.„,:,,:,,,,,,,,,,,„„,,,,,„,„,„:„,„„,„,„„„,.,„,,,,,,..„„,,,,,„„„„„„„„,,...,„„.„„,„,„„„„„„„„,.,,,.„:„,„..,,„:„:,:,,„:„,.„.,,,,„„„„„„„„„„,•,,„:„.,,,,„.„,„:„:,,.,..„,,,,,,„,„,„,„,:,„,,,,..,:,...:•:,,:,,...,„::•: .. • •• • ••••• ..:::•.. •_:•••••••:.:_:::•:•:•::•••::••••___::•••••.:••••:...,•••• ••• ••::,:.:.•••••:•:•:.:•.s.:_::••:••••••:,•:.:.•.•:••••••:,..:......„:....:....:..,.::„:....._•. ...:..:.E.,•,,•,„„•,,:,„••::,.,.„.,:„,.,„.„:„.„,.,.„.„,,F,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,„,:„.„.„„,,,,„,„,,•„„,.,„,„,„,,,,,,,,„„„,„„„„,:,,,,i,„„„„„„.„,.,„,„.,.„„„,..,.•,•:•:„.„.,...„.:„„„:,„,,,,,:,„.„,,,.,„,,,,,:,,,,,:::.„:.,......._ .........:......;H:..„••••••••,....,......,•,",,,:,,,,,,,,,,",.,„,,,",",,"",,,".":„,,,:,.,,,,,:,,,,.,,,,,H",„.,..,,..„,,•„„„„,,,,,:,,•„„„.,,,,s,,,,,,,:„.:,„,,.„.„,„,„.„.....„.,,i.„,„„:,,,.„.„„„,„„„,„„„„,,„„„,„„,„,„,:,,,.,.,,„,,,. ..••••••:•_•,.•:••••••••••••••••••:•:::•:••:::••••••••••••„•,:,•,,,,,,,,,.........„.... •••••••••••...:•:•::::•,:,...,.....:_•::•::••••.......••••••••„... ,:i*,:::,:,„,,,:,,.„.::::•:,„,:.„,..,,,,,„.,„„.,......... .,..„:•::::::„„:„.:,,,,,,,,,,,....... • ,„.„.„...,,,,...,..,„„::„,,,,,,,„„,,.:,:,:..•::::::.:.:;.„,:•,,i,„,„,.„.:.,,.„....,,...,..,••••„.„:„.„.„„,,,„........,•,............ ...........„...„:"„,:,,,,,::::,::::,".,,,,,„,„:„::,,,,,,„,„,„:„,...„.„.,....,,,,...,,,,..„,,,....„.:.„,::::::,:.:„„:„„.:............... . •...„. ...„,..."..„.„,.,;••..•....•,..••,.1,•••:::: •: •11.,ktitii.t.','Jl!t•••':•-!'E,,T-':.•,•-••,•-•:,•,:::i:,•-,••:::,.•,.,,::,4:401-4;ki,:-<,•,•••••,::'''''„".•''''':::::-•:•'„'-•• ....,....,.,....""":,.",..,:"",",,,ogiiiiiiigNT:1*IL.':,.<'-:.•<'<,Ji,L,'i„,'"'':'"'•'''''':'--' ,_ _ __ ...... .....•,....„..,.••••-.4.-,•:-.::,;,',:i-,•,iiiWiiiik:i :'':''•''''''*•*1211i•*0:W'4:•IIIIIgliliiiiiilitiiikkii,.ii,i,-.:'•,,,,,,„„,„„,:•,„,<:,:-:,„-•:••••••••••,••:••••••••••.•.:.: ,,r•• .: • •.1.1titeRlrf!!•'.':•!!-In!':',•,''''''''''''„„'„„„''''''''''''-':•:.:-..- -I , ' ,...........„,"",,,,,",""""„.1„:„..••j:,Egassilirlfillollipingli • 1:1M.:;:".,J..-;111„4„•':..„„„! '''''''''''''''''.:".•::.::•••..•:.:.•.:::„,,:,..„..<.:..,::;.,:,:;..:.:„,,•,,,,...,.:,,,,,,,,,:,,,.,,,,,,..,...,.:..„.,.,,.,,...,.'- ........x 111111111011110111111111,111Mplilip!!!iiiisliiii1111.111111:10.1! - --- ------,:"""'"""",'"46:"i"""N""M"""IBUI11111101111111111111111111•6".' 1110411111111110111MIMIAAPEILINIONIRIIIIIIME111111/4 ---"•:.'"''>'"•"1""'"":411111111111111111111111111111011111"MIN,Ilitilltiallailliki.:,,i'•!,"1,41111111111111111111111.1111111114.111,1111161411,1„i„'F'':„„„„*„''''.--/, - - % "."."----••••'.-'-".;•.•:•,"'"''4;:4;4r-i ::MiiiiRig„„„1„„„„„„g„':„„„„„„'''''::''''''-:---.......„..."••"•,,,"","","""""4""iiiiigniii2,:::MINENVIEVIN„...„„A ",:i,"",""•"•Niii.,itg.ftgiMinglitIi':::!„%„:„1„',":;;.i.eg;i;:',FI.:ik.;:1"/ • 7.7.-'''."..!°.7::z. 7,A.. f$,;40j.:14tH§gitt"kaM-';iiitTr-graNn-ng,',''''""''''''''...-- '''''' - ,,„..:•:,„*.m.i.:%.11201:41iiiiiiiiiii:11.;ligJa,,,i53*.'4>if,-,IN,.1-.;•!!,:i.,!..•;'••••- • • -, z - ••-••-•:..--••• .•------------- ...,.....:„...:::::,,,,,,...,,,,,,,,,:::<,...,,••.,....„..,....,,,,,,,,,,,,, *,,,...,,,,,•:••-• -;a ).A ...*',,,,',„,,..„:„,',4,„•„,''''.."''''''''''"'":""..... - < ......-","g",,,""":".""kiaRniglgrniiingt•e„':<,,?.?4'iiiiP:::W...„,'`foii,„„:„„..' • • .- ' , -----'---- ----------------------- ......-..--..............,,....,......,....:„..„...,....•.,..,....„„,,„-,,,. , ... • •••-,,41,/: ---,-.--z ,......... ,,,,,,,,,*.....,:,:::,0",:, ------•------,---,,,,,,,,,,,,,-.<•--............. . -. .,..,-,„•••::.. ......,,,,,•-•:::.•••.........,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,<•-,..,.....,.,...•-•••••• - .•. ...................„.:.::::::.""",","""""ligigilt<OitiiatliiiiiiIiiii„i„„.„.„,,,,,i.,,7 .... ,, .„....:...::::.,•;".",",""":::,:::,:4":::MIII Sili-gicnilinitailigifIlik'.21110:13rZt;:1:11;•:::.',7:e,,<Ili: •"'..'"""1"'"""''''815111111.11:11111111111111111111111111111111111111- •---..•-••••••..,•",,i;,,,,,,,meirirf;! -,..-'17.7111:!'1111111111111111V 1111.111,141111:111111111A.101•111r11!!!!1!".011774,!Ii: 1 i -/- '''''''''''''''''''''''' .........„...... ...... ,...•....„,,......„......."......•.. .,.............„.?„,....„.....,,....,....,..,.....„.„..............,..„. ......... ,.... A.,„,...,....,......,,,..:::,,,.::„,.:„„.„,,,,.:,,,„ •....„.„„„:,,,:,,,,:,,,„......„,,„<„:::.:,....... - •••••••••••-_,•••••••••__ ...... .. ......•-..........••.-............•.•:/......7„,.......-H ..„: -----------. . ...---:,--"--:„k-----".,--t:,--,-:--- -------- ....,..,.... „.... .. . ...„,.. ......„......... •,.... ...............,•....•.,......,•••• ..•,,. .......,....., _ .. .......... .. .... .............. ...........„_......... ......................................,..... „.................. ----------------A.••-•••-••- •••• •• • • „..........::::::„..,..,„:„..,..,„„,.":„. ,...„„, ,:„,,,,,.,,,:,:x„,„„„.„,„„„„„„.:,,;„:„..,,,,„„„„,,,...„,,-.„.,",„„„„,„.„,,„.„,,:„„,,,,„.„,,,„.,,,„::,:„„:.,:r.„,..,,,,„„.:,,,„..,„„„.„.....,,,„„;,-„-,,.,„.„„,:,.:--.;.;„„:„„:,„;„,„.„,„„„,„„„,,,,,,,;,,„:,,,-,--,,,.,,::::::::..,-: ii. ... 1,:,,, ,,,.,,,„.,-0.411101iliiiiiit,,i2,,,,,„.,44,1,11.11.41,101milloot,1111%,„:,,,,i,.,,,,,;,it;,::•,,,,101.,,,,,,,i„:4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,„„.„,,,,i,„:,, „,,,,,,„.. ...-- .„,i„:,,""".,,,„,,,,,„„:,•,:„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,„,,,,,,,,,,,,,•.,,H,I....:,,,;g„,,,,,,,,,,,,,",,","",,,,,,..,,:,„"""„"""",",".,",:,,,,,,.,-oi,,,,,,,,,,,,,, H„,,,„„•„,„„:„„„„",,,:",„":„,„„„,„,....„„,,"„,,,,,:„.,,,,,,:,,„,,,,,:,„„,,,.;,„.,„, ,,,,,,,,.,„.,.,,,,,,,,,,,„.„..„.„.. ,.,,,,,,,,,,...„„,,,,,,,,,,,,,„:,,,,,,,,,„„„),„„1„,:„:,,,„„„.,„„,,:,,,,,:.,„„,,,,,,,,,,...,...."":".,,,:"."""",","","„,".„,„,„„„„„,,,,,,,„.„.„,„„,,..,,,,„..„,.,.,,:,,,,,:„,„.„„,„..„,„„..„,„„,„,,,,_:„.„.._....,, ,. •„„„.,,,,,„,„.:,,,„,„,;,„,,..,,,4„,7:,,,-,-...,.,,,,,,,.• „,,,,,,,„,.,„„„,„,„„,,,„,„„.„„•,•„,„„:„„„„,„„„,-,,:.„,,„„.,„.,......... ,,,,:,,,:„,„.:„..„,,..„."„.""""",„„„„,„:„,„,„,„„,„,:.,-,-;„,,,„,„.„,,,,,„ „•,,,,,,,,,,,,„„..„„:„:„,,,...„,,..„,,,,„„,,,,„,•„:„,„„,,,•„,,,,,•„,,,,,,,,,,„„.„,,.„,„,„,„„,,„,,,„,,,,„,,,,,„„„„„„,„:„„„„.•.„....,.:...,,,,:.,:::::::„.:::::„.,,"„,,"""."„.,,,,.,„„,:,,,,,„:„:„.„,.,,,„,•„„.„.„,„,,,,.,,,,,,„.„,,,•,„.„.„:„,„,,..„!„..„,,„ , „.„,,,„„,,,„„,,,....,.,,,,.,„.,,,,,,,,m„,,,,,,,,,„:„,,,,.,,,„,,,„:„„,.,..,..„,„,,•.....:„„„,„,,,„,„,„„,,,,,„„„„,„,,,,„„„,„.,,,,:,.,„,,,,,.„,,,,,„„,,,,,,„„,,,,,,,.,,,,,,„,,,,,,.„,„,,,,„,,,,,..,..„,,,„„,„,„,,,:„„„„,,,„,,,,,,,,,,:,„„,„„„,„„„,„,„,„:„:„,„.„,,e,0„,,,„,„.„,„,:„..,,,„.„,„,,,,,,„„,,,,,,,,,,,.,„,,,,,,,,„,„:„„„,,,,,,,,„„„„,„..,„„,,,,,„„•,,,•„,,,,,,,,„,„,."..,,.,,,„„,,,.„,„,„.„,„,„,...,,,,..„„„:„:„,„,„,„.„,„.„..,,,,•,„„,•,,,,.„,„,„,„„,„:„,,,.,„, , ..„„„,,,,,,„,„•„„.„.,,,,,,...„„,,,,„,„,,,,„,,,,,,,,„,.:c„:„,,,,,,,,,..„,"""":„.„,",„.„,,,,,,,,,,,,„„,,,,„„:.,,:,,,,,.,:.::,•,,,,,,„,,„.„-,,:,,,„,„„„,„,„,,,,,,,,,,,:„.,","","„,,,,,„,,,.,..„,,,.,.,,,„,„,,,„,,,.,,,,„,„,„„,„,„""",,,,„",,,,,•„„,,:,,,,,,,;„:„!„.",,,..,,,,,,,..„,,,,,,,.„,,,,:„:„:„.:„--,,,„,,,,,,,„,,,,„,„:„„:„,„,„,„,„.„.„,„.„,,,,,„,,,.„,„"...,,,,„.",„„.,,,,:„,,,,,,,i,„,„,„,„„,„,„,„,.,,,,.„„„,„,„,„„<„,„:„.„:„.„•,„„- .„,,,,„. ,,,,,.. . , ,,:„...„, ,„...„.,.„„..„....,,,,,,,,,,,,,„„,,,,„„„.„.„,.....„.„.„„ , "„,„,.",",",:„.„":„.•,,,,i,„„„„u„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,„0„,,,„a„,„,"„"„„„„„,„„,,,,,,,„„.„,,,,,,„„,„•:..„.,,„,4,,,„,„:„.„,„„,,,,,,:i„,,,,,,„:„.„,„,":.„,„:„:„„,,,,,,,,,„,,,.,„:„Riii.,,,,,,„„,..„„„„„,„„„„,„,„,„,„,,,,,,,,,,,:,:::::::-••••••••, „ ..,.„.2::""",,,,".:,",,:„",",",","„:".,„:,,:,,,,.",,, , ,...„,,,,,. ,,i,„.„.::,,,,„„.,„.„„,,,,:.,.,.,:,,„.„.„..,.,•,„,...,,,,,..„,,,,,!,:,„,„„,„,„„,,,,,, i ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,„,,,,i,„...„",„""„,""."."„,...„4„,„.„„„,•,,„,„„,„:„.„,..„:„,,,,,,,:„.„,„,,.,...":,,,,,,„:„.„„a..„,„,,,,,,,,„.„."„,„,,,,„,„,„,,,,„,„„,„,,,,,,,„,„:„„„:„.„:„„„:„„:,:,,:::„:,,„„„:„:„::::::„.: . ........,...,....."""",""""""",„.",„,,,,,,,,,„,,,,,,„,„,,,,,...".,,,,,,„,„,,,,:ii„,„,,„„:„"",,"",..,,,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,„,..„,,,,,,„,-,,„,„,„,,,,•,,,,d,,,i, , ,,, ,.,z,,,„„x„,„,,,,,„,,,,,,,;,,,,,,,„,,,„•,,,,„,,,„„,„„,„„„,„„,„,,, „!,,,,„‘ ,,,,,,..,....,,,4„,„,,,,,,,•,.,..."16:ii.„ , , , :„.„. , ,,„ , , , ,:•,.„,„ , ,. ,..,,,,„.,„,,,,,,,,,„„:„.„,„,,,,,,,;...,,,,,,,,„••,,,,,,„,.,,,„,„„„,,,,,,,,,.,,„,,,,,,,,r,„,,,i.,,,,.„..„,„,,,,,,,,„„ , — . „ ,,, „„ ,;-„,,,,,,,,,i,„,„,„,,,,„:,,,,,,,,„0,,..„,,,„„„,„„,ists„,,,,,,,:„.„,;,,,.,,,z„,„0,„,„,„„iiii:,,,,,i,,,,,,,,,,,,,„,„„,,„,,,•„,..,.,,,,.,,,,,,,:„,„, „i„„,,,,,,„„,, ,,..,,t,„,„„:„,„::,„.:„.,.,;.„.„,.,,„1„„„.,,,,,,„„,„„„„o„„H„a,,u,",,.,,,p,,,,„..„,„,„.,.„,,,,.,m..„,„,,„,..,,,,,::,„,,..,,,i,,.,,,,::„,,„ is,..i.,i.„.,,t,,,. , •„.„,.„,„„!,.,.•,,,,„,,,,,„,ii,„„,,,,„,,,,,,,„,„,,,i,„„,,,,„:„,,.,,,,.„,,,...,.„,,,,,,,,,,,.,„,„. , ,,,•:,,,,;;,,,,i,„,,,,,,,..„,,„,„,„:,,,,,,N„,,,,,,.„,„„,,,„:,,„,,,,,,,,,,u,„,..ii, : , , ,„,,,,„„,,,,,,!,,,,,.:.„..,..,,„.„...„,,,,:,,,, ... , ... ,. 1 mlefiao.4,ommirs,,,,,,:!,,-,,,,.,,,,''''..--','=-;--:' ,:.. - ...... Pump Ranch Steam -r h anc_ House pusch R 1 Workshop Attendance Form Certified Grant Application Form 3 State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Consultation Form 4 Applicant Resolution/Authority to Apply Project Summary, Professional Qualifications, & Photos Project Summary The Pusch Ranch House was probably built within a few years of the Pump House, circa 1880, as a retreat on the ranch for the Pusch family. The building is a good example of a transitional Sonoran-style building, consisting of high-walled, thick adobe core with a timber framed hipped roof. According to an early photograph taken around 1900, the south facade was lined by an open, wood-framed porch running its entire length. Over time, other porches and small shed additions were attached to the north, east and south sides of the original adobe core. Two bathroom additions were constructed on the north side in the 1910s and 20s. An open porch spanned between the bathroom additions until the mid 1970s when the porch was enlarged and enclosed by the Leiber Family. The porch along the east and south side of the building was originally a screened porch, with the chimneys and glass panels added during the 1980s. The framed porch at the SW corner of the building also dates to the 1980s. The building is in good condition with only minor structural deficiencies. The Master Plan proposes removing later additions and restoring and rehabilitating the building to its appearance during the late 19th Century. 1. Architectural feature: Exterior Walls Approximate date of feature: 1880s Existing feature and condition: Stucco in mostly good condition; requires patching. Work and impact on feature: Stucco will be patched and painted. 2. Architectural feature: Exterior Doors Approximate date of feature: 1980s Existing feature and condition: Doors in working condition. Work and impact on feature: Replace doors and refinish replacements. 3. Architectural feature: Roof Framing Approximate date of feature: 1880s Existing feature and condition: Structural damage; stabilization repairs done summer of 2007. Work and impact on feature: Upgrade roof framer, rework dormer, porch framing, porch posts, roof sheathing, and paint porch. 7 4. Architectural feature: Roof Approximate date of feature: 1980s Existing feature and condition: Structural damage; stabilization repairs done summer of 2007. Work and impact on feature: Install rolled roof and corrugated metal roofing, install roof installation and flashing, and rework chimney. 5. Architectural feature: Interior walls Approximate date of feature: 1880s Existing feature and condition: Walls in fair condition. Work and impact on feature: Patch and paint walls. 6. Architectural feature: Interior Doors Approximate date of feature: 1980s Existing feature and condition: Working condition. Work and impact on feature: Replace doors and refinish replacements. 7. Architectural feature: Flooring Approximate date of feature: 1980s Existing feature and condition: Worn carpet and tile. Work and impact on feature: Remove existing flooring; replace with wood flooring and wood base. 8. Architectural feature: Ceilings Approximate date of feature: 1880s Existing feature and condition: General stable; one roof had a ceiling separate from the roof and has fallen down. Work and impact on feature: Repair separation and general patching and painting. 8 Photo Documentation (4 color photos 4" x 6" size) ..,-....- .:.:.'..:..,,,.,,,,...i''''..':',:',...,''''',...'''''.:.':.'''''''*''''''.-"...'14''''':''....'''''::-.:1..'.:':':::.. '1 :: ..„.„:.::.. ....„„,„„„„„„,.1,ilio,,.!!!!!!!!!!!-,;!!!:4.,:,,:::ii..,.,......,,.................,..,.,...........,.,...................,,,........_. _. / yt' s�Jf r � ' t 5 ; iikuillMaRtili /.0111160,111„:„:„:,i,,,,,,,,,,--- a �; /-� Y#E'.�'•''�'•.'�,'•.'��••`'��^'�'•.�2 :s.'::;;E`3;E/Ss r3f,ss;i-•�� �-sok-"lrF� ... � ,fi,,.>rr/..:.,.� roc-�%rri- k T'� :. f . . .....„....-..,...:..... ,.. ,1„::::•?:-....,,,,-!.,.,..„..:,,,,,.-.11,,:i„',.111,0,---", 'ir..,,,,;,..(.....717,t)::':..:• ir :....•....i:H•"„,,,,,,„1,,,.i,„,i,:,::,;ii...,,,•,,,.,.....„„lic..:=;•.:31;,„,„„''',:'11".","10.,:,•,,,t,,. J:jrlitil,:tii"'".,:....:.i,•1,-'II'.,.,„,....„...H1HiL„'''''''''" . /i "fy'`` ';,J , "�. '.fi,l „,,,":,,,,,.,,•,,,,,k,,,,,,,,2„„„„„,,,,,,',,':''.......-- `" ,bf�!.27/r's''. � .,'�:/ �.;:� ::��r ':i/a �/r4 f .�•,•'";s�•':£'• r{ri / .i<�. fi / �;�ter,r. f.........r.:::.,::....;:.:: ,:,......:i� .s•t.. .5..' Y/ u .�/ // ./..�. :.<.::; :.../..: EEs'x'i'r'r,:? •':J � %•'�� �� /xi /::.::'-�! � XYZ:: J/� Y ...,.r.r......... .../� : YF'H �� ,r..:..... r""'J:»�'":...:.,.CLC!-'r ../. :. .:. .. ..//,.i./,'moi /�� // �y .i.;�::......... ..GLG.':•��'%lf',/:•-/ii- is;`[: rr: Figure 1 West elevation circa 1900.Image courtesy of the AHS-Tucson. 9 Project Narrative 10 Project Narrative A. Planning 1. Project Planning: On May 18, 2004, the voters of Pima County approved the use of Pima County Bond Funds to purchase the Steam Pump Ranch site and restore/rehabilitate the historic ranch environment, buildings and structures (refer to page 73 of Pima County Bond Action, ORDINANCE NO. 2007 - , page XXX). The Town of Oro Valley acquired the (northern) Leiber parcel in April of 2007 and the (southern) OVB parcel in August of 2007. Town of Oro Valley will be granting Pima County a Preservation Easement on the entire site to ensure the continued conservation of this historic resource. The Steam Pump Ranch Master Plan was developed in the context of very active involvement of Town and region residents and with the careful oversight of the Mayor and Town Council and its appointed advisory committees and commissions. The immediate steward of the planning process was the Steam Pump Ranch Task Force appointed by the Mayor and Town Council of Oro Valley. The charge to the Task Force by the Mayor and Town Council was to: • Evaluate studies, public meeting input, develop use and site design alternatives. • Formulate a final recommendation on the Master Plan document and Design Scenario to be considered by the Historic Preservation Commission and Town Council. The Task Force met eighteen times since formation in August of 2007 through April of 2008. The Oro Valle reservatio Historic)Commission was charged with the larger oversight of the process and was actively engaged with the Master Plan at most of its monthly meetings. The Mayor and Town Council also participated in extensive review and commentary in three formal Town Council meetings and a lengthy Study Session. There were three public meetings to gather commentary directly from the community. The Master Plan itself was organized around a carefully-structured process using a "Rational Planning" model. The first step in this process was the extensive gathering of factual, technical and historical information about this site. Economic and marketing analysis of comparable sites was also collected and it informed the planning process. The Master Plan is nearly complete, with Final Recommendations from the Task Force, as well as the Historic Preservation Commission. The Draft 11 Master Plan will be forwarded on the Oro Valley Town Council for final review and approvals. Once the Master Plan has been approved by the Town Council, the Master Plan will be forwarded to the Pima County Board of Supervisors for their approval (refer to Draft Steam Pump Ranch Master Plan, page XXX). A Preservation Easement will be granted to Pima County for preservation in perpetuity of the site (refer to Preservation Easement, page XXX). a. Comprehensive Planning: Historic Preservation is a key element in the General Plan 2020 (refer to pages 91-92 in General Plan 2020, page XXX). The following are noteworthy policies pertaining to Historic Preservation, and the Steam Pump Ranch: • Policy 10.1.2: "The Town shall use the standards and criteria established by the National Register of Historic Places, as amended, to identify significant cultural resources, including people, events, and activities, in Oro Valley, specifically identify Steam Pump Ranch and Honey Bee Village". • Policy 10.1.3: "The Town shall continue to consider the potential effect of development projects on significant prehistoric and historic resources during the planning and design processes. Cultural resources determined to be significant will be preserved in place if possible, and if not, appropriate data recovery and documentation will be prepared in consultation with the Arizona State Historic Preservation Office. Avoidance of significant sites is preferred over data recovery and documentation". • Policy 10.1.5: "The Town shall actively seek grants and other funding mechanisms to provide for the protection and preservation of cultural resources or resources of value to local culture. The Town shall also ,a r investigate use of these funds to provide for interpretive locations and facilities". - (i: • Policy 10.1.6: "Through partnerships and collaborative efforts, Te Town shall identify appropriate strategies to protect archaeological and (:;(c ) cultural resources". • Policy 10.2.2: "The Town shall consider the potential for incorporating interpretive elements related to cultural resource sites during planning for public parks, trails, and other public use areas". • Policy 10.2.3: "The Town shall actively initiate and pursue cooperative opportunities with other jurisdictions and organizations (e.g., Catalina State Park, Pima County) with regard to use of sites for education and historic interpretation". • Policy 10.3.1: "As the Town acquires or develops facilities, it shall look for opportunities to exhibit artifacts to educate the public". 12 The Town of Oro Valley Historic Preservation Commission was established on December 15, 2004. The following are noteworthy components of the Historic Preservation Ordinance (refer to Section 6-10-1 in Ordinance, page XXX): • Identify and preserve the historic properties that represent distinctive elements of Oro Valley's historic, archaeological, architectural and cultural heritage; maintain and foster their unique identities, which in turn helps to make the community a desirable place to live, work and visit. • Promote the use of historic properties for the education, pleasure, and welfare of the people of the Town. • Foster civic pride in the accomplishments of the past. • Protect and enhance Oro Valley's attractiveness to visitors which also provides support and stimulus to the economy. • Stabilize and improve property values of rehabilitated and protected sites. • Provide incentives for restoration by owners of landmarks or historic properties. • Provide standards for restoration of designated properties and for new construction within Historic Districts. 13 b. Project Specific Plans: Specific plans have been completed or are in process of being finalized in preparation for this grant request. The Steam Pump Master Plan is intended as a tool to preserve the significance and integrity of the buildings, artifacts, and landscape of the Ranch, is a plan for creative interpretation, is a blueprint for economic sustainability of the Ranch, and is a long-range vision for stewardship to bring Steam Pump Ranch back to life as vehicle for education for future generations. This grant request specifically focuses on the rehabilitation of the Pusch Ranch House. Proposed treatments for the Pusch Ranch House are guided by the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Historic Preservation. A summary of the Standards is included (refer to page Al-4 of the Draft Steam Pump Master Plan, page XXX). Here, "rehabilitation is defined as the act or process of making possible a compatible use for a property through, repair, alterations, and additions while preserving those portions or features which convey its historical, cultural, or architectural values" (refer to page A2 of the Draft Steam Pump Master Plan, page XXX). A Historic Building Preservation Plan was completed as part of the Master Plan process (refer to pages 12-15, Building and Landscape Assessment, page XXX). The Pusch Ranch House was probably built within a few years of the Pump House, circa 1880, as a retreat on the ranch for the Pusch family. The building is a good example of a transitional Sonoran-style building, consisting of high-walled, thick adobe core with a timber framed hipped roof. According to an early photograph taken around 1900, the south facade was lined by an open, wood-framed porch running its entire length. Over time, other porches and small shed additions were attached to the north, east and south sides of the original adobe core. Two bathroom additions were constructed on the north side in the 1910s and 20s. An open porch spanned between the bathroom additions until the mid 1970s when the porch was enlarged and enclosed by the Leiber Family. The porch along the east and south side of the building was originally a screened porch, with the chimneys and glass panels added during the 1980s. The framed porch at the SW corner of the building also dates to the 1980s. The building is in good condition with only minor structural deficiencies. Emergency stabilization and repairs completed during the summer of 2007 concentrated on strengthening the roof framing and repairing the roof membrane to prevent water infiltration. The Master Plan proposes removing later additions and restoring and rehabilitating the building to its appearance during the late 19th Century (refer to Budget Estimate by Compusult, Inc. for the Pusch Ranch House pages 3-5 of 13 in the Draft Master Plan, page XXX). 14 2. End Use: From an interpretive perspective, the consensus conclusion was the preference to tell the stories of the two major family eras on the site: the Pusch Family period (1874 — 1933) and the Procter Family period (1933 — 2007) with a "period of significance" for the site of 1874-1960. The intent of this interpretive strategy was to highlight the differences in technology, architecture, landscape, water use, food production, transportation, commerce, education, and leisure activities of these two distinct eras. The layout of the Steam Pump Ranch Master Plan facilitates a north-south imaginary line to be drawn through the site and to use the preserved buildings, landscape and artifacts on either side of this line to tell the distinctly different stories of these two eras. The additional guideline that emerged from the Task Force was the desire to keep any significant new structures or commercial activities out of the historical core of the Steam Pump Ranch. The end use of the Steam Pump Ranch property is as a historic park, with various educational and interpretive uses onsite (refer to page 6 of the Draft Steam Pump Ranch Master Plan, page XXX). The rehabilitation of the Pusch Ranch House includes removing later additions and restoring and rehabilitating the building to its appearance during the late 19th Century. This building will be adaptively re-used for exhibits on Pusch-Zellweger settlement in the region, founding of SPR and connection of SPR to the local economy, rotating exhibits focused on the Pusch family and ranching, including china, baskets, trunk, organ, and related items, (subject to availability), meeting room space, a Research library starting with documents from the George Pusch Collection of historical documents, and as office space and climatically controlled space for archival materials (refer to page 32 of the Draft Steam Pump Ranch Master Plan, page XXX). Currently, there are no facilities within the Town to exhibit artifacts in order to educate the public about the rich historic resources of the area. The rehabilitation and preservation of Steam Pump Ranch, and the Pusch Ranch House in particular, will address this clear need to educate the public about their historic resources. The General Plan specifically states that the "Town shall use the standards and criteria established by the National Register of Historic Places, as amended, to identify significant cultural resources, including people, events, and activities, in Oro Valley, specifically identify Steam Pump Ranch and Honey Bee Village" (refer to page 92 of the General Plan 2020, page XXX). 15 3. Project Team: Currently, no specifically qualified personne outside of the Town of Oro Valley staff have been identified to wor on this rehabilitation and restoration proposal. However, upon • of this grant popersfartit, a Request for Qualifications from qualified personnel in accordance with the Secretary of Interior's Standards for Professional Qualifications shall be put into place and a Project Team comprised of an Architect, in addition to the Town of Oro Valley Special Projects Coordinator and Historic Preservation Commission, shall be formed. Resumes of the Special Projects Coordinator and the Historic Preservation Commission can be found on page XXX. Town staff will assist in the restoration labors as needed and available, with oversight from the Project Architect and Project Manager. The Building Official for the Town will assist with issuance of any construction permits. The Town of Oro Valley has an excellent history of seeking qualified := 4-L,�, � r n�- external assistance -i.n- till o#'consultants,-aevidenceca -he Steam PumpRanch Master Planning process. '7 4if,f2 The Special Projects Coordinator will be the Town of Oro Valley project manager, overseeing the selection of applicants from the Request for Qualifications from qualified personnel in accordance with the Secretary of Interior's Standards for Professional Qualifications • ' . The Architect shall have, minimum qualification - � -• - .: ct. professional degree in architecture and at least two years of full-time professional experiences in architecture or a state license to practice. The Architect shall be responsible for assisting the Special Projects Coordinator in the hiring of sub-contractors to implement the restoration and rehabilitation of the Pusch Ranch House. The architect will also ensure that all work is held to the Secretary of Interior's Standards. Other qualified personal may be identified at the stage of the Request for Qualifications. 16 4. Matching Funds The rehabilitation and restoration of the Pusch Ranch House will cost approximately $421,200 (refer to page 3-5 in the Statement of Probable Cost section of the Draft Master Plan, page XXX). Pima County Cultural Resource department, the administrator of the 2004 Pima County Bond funds, has written in support of the appropriateness of the use of funds as "match" for applications for grants for eligible, allowed bond fund uses for Steam Pump Ranch (refer to Pima County Cultural Resources Memo dated March 27, 2008, page XXX). ..y., We propose utilizing $243,198 of the Pima County Bond funds to provide a c41-59), P 59% match. With the awarding of the $150,000 Heritage Grant, there is still '( \ a deficient of $28,002 to reach the total cost of restoration of $421,200. The Town of Oro Valley has authorized providing,$28,002 balance the remaining costs of the restoration (refer to the Draft Resolution, page XXX). --iiii& (y4 17 B. Public Benefit 1. Community Impact a. Community Benefits There are numerous potential benefits to the Ory lley Community, as well as the greater Southern Arizona community, for the preservation of Steam Pump Ranch. While Steam Pump Ranch has the potential to draw on tourist markets, resident markets will be a primary source of visitation. The resident markets for an attraction such as Steam Pump Ranch are defined as the area whose residents would visit the attraction as a day-trip. Persons in this Resident Market Area often have repeat visitation patterns, or become members of the institution. Visiting the Steam Pump Ranch would be a primary purpose or important part of a day-trip. Tourists may be an important market segment for the proposed Steam Pump Ranch in Oro Valley. Arizona is a popular travel destination, with an estimated 33.7 million overnight trips to or within the state in 2006 (refer to pages III-1, III-5-7, III- 10, and IV-1 of the Draft Master Plan, page XXX). The increased number of visitors to an area has a direct impact on the economic benefits to the community. As noted in the Arizona Historic Preservation Plan, there is now validation that the general public acknowledges this connection between historic preservation and economic benefits, from the connection to increasing tourism (95% agreed) to helping downtown businesses (90% agreed). It is also important that the public understands that historic district designation can stabilize neighborhoods and increase property values (82% agreed). More than three fourths of Arizonans agreed that the preservation of historic properties improves their quality of life (77% agreed) (refer to pages 32-33 of the State Historic Preservation Plan Update 2000, page XXX). Steam Pump Ranch can provide a prime opportunity to combine historic preservation and economic benefits. The benefits to the community are not only economic in nature. The Draft Master Plan notes many of these potential benefits of historic preservation. Specific examples include a number of facets; the education provided to local school children, tourists, and the general public about these regions or localities; the enhancemen�to ,tourism and economic development provided by educational attractions; the preservation of scenic and environmentally sensitive landscapes; and theinherent benefit of preserving and interpreting culture (refer to page IV-1, Dr ft Master Plan, page XXX). 18 Additionally, a Community Survey was conducted in the Town of Oro Valley. Historic Preservation was one of the aspects included in the survey (refer to page 48 in the Community Survey, page XXX). Particularly noteworthy is the need for *a— education and information about historic preservation opportunities (refer to page 30 in the Community Survey, page XXX). The Oro Valley Historical Society has been identified as a potential partner at Steam Pump Ranch. One of the goals of the OVHS is to increase knowledge and awareness about historic preservation in Oro Valley. The Steam Pump Ranch will provide the OVHS a place ax-ereler to accomplish the goal. b. National Registry Nomination Steam Pump Ranch has been determined eligible for nomination to the National Register of Historic Places. The entire Steam Pump Ranch is in the process of being nominated to the National Register of Historic Places as a scope item of the Steam Pump Ranch Master Plan. The Steam Pump Ranch is a significant cultural landscape with the potential to illuminate the cultural and natural legacies of the region for visitors, and more importantly, new residents of the Sonoran Desert. The site may also become the cultural heart of Oro Valley, providing residents with a sense of place and a center for community activities and events (refer to page 1 of the Steam Pump Ranch Building and Landscape, page XXX). The most important item to consider for National Register of Historic Places is integrity. Integrity refers to the ability of a historic property to convey its historic significance. The Steam Pump Ranch site possess moderate to high levels of integrity in each of the seven areas. Integrity is highest for location, setting and feeling and lowest for aspects of design, materials and workmanship. The loss of integrity at several buildings is primarily due to additions that obscure the historic characteristics of the building. Since all of these additions are "reversible," the integrity could be improved by removing the additions and restoring the buildings back to a period of significance I determined by the master plan (refer to page 6 of the Steam Pump Ranch Building and Landscape, page XXX). As noted in the SHPO consultation for this grant request, "restoration to an early time period should be done carefully and with accurate information". The Pusch Ranch House additions have been clearly documented in Harris Sobin's Building Condition Assessment Report: Steam Pump Ranch House (page 11 of Building Condition Assessment Report: Steam Pump Ranch House, page XXX). 19 Community Involvement and Support Available c. How has the community been involved in project? As part of the Steam Pump Ranch Master Plan, numerous public meetings and hearings have been held. Three open house meetings were held to gather commentary directly from the community on the proposed Master Plan design scenarios (refer to Agendas — Steam Pump Ranch Public Meetings, page XXX and numerous Explorer Articles, page XXX). These public meeting included a brief presentation portion by Poster Frost Associates, the Master Plan consultants, and the majority of each meeting was spend garnering feedback and direction from the community as to what they would like to see in the preservation of this resource. Public hearings with the Historic Preservation Commission and Town Council were also held (refer to Agendas — HPC and TC, page XXX). The Oro Valley reservation Historic Commission was charged with the larger oversight of the process and was actively engaged with the Master Plan at most of its monthly meetings. The Mayor and Town Council also participated in extensive review and commentary in three formal Town Council meetings and a lengthy Study Session. The Task Force meetings were also open to the public (refer to Agendas — Task Force meetings, page XXX). The Task Force was comprised of a broad cross-section of stakeholders and existing Oro Valley Commissions/Boards charged with historic preservation, parks, and/or land use decisions. The cowinfollowere representatives to the Task Force: Historic Preservation mmittee .Parks & Recreation Advisory Board, Oro Valley Historic Society Planning & Zoning Commission, Citizen at Large, Pima County Cultural Resources, State Historic Preservation Office, Representative of Evergreen Devco, owner of Steam Pump Village (abutting property), and Development Review Board. Various Town departments had representatives as members of the Task Force, including Planning and Zoning, Parks and Recreation, and Economic Development. d. Does the community support the project? The community, and by extension, the region, does support the project. On May 18, 2004, the voters of Pima County approved the use of Pima County Bond Funds to purchase the Steam Pump Ranch site and restore/rehabilitate the historic ranch environment, buildings and structures (refer to page 73 of Pima County Bond Action, ORDINANCE NO. 2007 - , page XXX). Now that the site has been purchased and limited stabilization work has commenced, and with the Master Plan nearly completion, the voter of Pima County will be asked again to continue showing their support for this project 20 f cfr through another Bond election to implement the Master Plan. It is critical g that the general public sees progress/historic preservation projects, as this will in turn, perpetuate the continued community support for historic preservation (refer to page 25 of the Arizona Historic Preservation Plan, page XXX). Prior to the acquisition of the Steam Pump Ranch site, members of the community were actively involved. Numerous articles and public interest pieces were published in the local newspaper — The Explorer Newspaper. Listed below are a few excerpts detailing the level of commitment and involvement of the community for the preservation of Steam Pump Ranch. In August of 2004, the Explorer Newspaper noted that according to Town staff, council members and an interested citizens committee, the realization of Steam Pump as a historic site and entertainment destination is back on its way. Completion of the site has been deemed the "highest priority"project by the town in using county bond money approved by voters in May (refer to August 11, 2004 Explorer Newspaper article, page XXX). Additionally, following site acquisition and the implementation of emergency stabilization work, community involvement and support continued to grow. As noted in the Explorer Newspaper in 2007, members of the Oro Valley building community have stepped up with volunteer manpower to help the town complete an emergency stabilization of structures at Steam Pump Ranch. Southern Arizona Home Builders Association (SAHBA) commissioned volunteer labor from their ranks. The Town paid the cost of material for the job while companies such as Ralph Hays Roofing and Johnson-Manley Lumber provided the labor (refer to July 11, 2007 Explorer Newspaper article, page XXX). In August of 2007, the Town of Oro Valley held an acquisition celebration for Steam Pump Ranch. The Explorer Newspaper quoted Oro Valley Mayor Paul Loomis, who underscored similarities between the vision that brought Pusch and John Zellweger, who co-founded the ranch, to the area and what attracts new residents to the area today. The mayor said preserving the ranch as a core historic area in Oro Valley is important because "the community can't move forward without understanding its history"(refer to August 22, 2007 Explorer Newspaper article, page XXX). . Clearly, there has been demonstrated and continued support for the acquisition and preservation of Steam Pump Ranch. Additional Steam Pump Ranch Explorer Newspaper articles can be found on page XXX. 21 C. Administrative Compliance (SHPO staff will complete this section - Page intentionally left blank). 22 D. References (Note: This section is not complete) Arizona Historic Preservation Plan Deed of Preservation Easement between the Town of Oro Valley and Pima County. 2008. (Approval Pending) Poster Frost Associates with SAGE Landscape Architecture and Environmental. Steam Pump Ranch Building and Landscape Assessments. Tucson,Arizona, August 2007 Thiel, Homer J. Cultural Resources Survey of The Steam Pump Ranch, Oro Valley, Pima County, Arizona. Tucson, Arizona: Desert Archaeology, Inc, 2007. Sobin, Harris. Building Condition Assessment Report: Steam Pump Building. Report prepared for OVB Partners, LLC. Tucson, Arizona, 10 March 2004. Sobin, Harris. Building Condition Assessment Report: Steam Pump Ranch House. Report prepared for OVB Partners, LLC. Tucson, Arizona, 11 February 2004. Weeks, Kay D. and Anne E. Grimmer. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring and reconstructing Historic Buildings. Washington D.C.: U.S. Department of the Interior,National Park Service, 1995. Draft Steam Pump Master Plan Pima County 2004 Bond Action General Plan 2020 Community Survey Historic Preservation 'n-48R Ordinance Draft Preservation Easement Pima County Cultural Resources Memo, March 27, 2008 Pima County Bond Action, ORDINANCE NO. 2007 - , Agendas — Steam Pump Ranch Public Meetings Agendas — HPC and TC Agendas —Task Force meetings Arizona Daily Star Articles Task Force Recommendation Historic Preservation Commission recommendation & Minutes Public Meeting Agendas Newspaper articles - (Explorer and Arizona Daily Star) Historic Building Preservation Plan (HBPP) 23 Budget Forms 24 E. Budget Forms Estimated Project Cost Form (Insert project cost form from page 41) 25 Scope Item Timetable Anticipated Anticipated Scope Start Date Completion Date Site Grading/Drainage Demolition Foundation Exterior Walls Exterior Doors Exterior Windows Roof Framing Roofing Interior Walls Interior Doors Flooring Ceilings Specialties Fire Protection HVAC Electrical The first round of the Heritage Grants is awarded in September 2008. We anticipate the need of one and a half months for the Request for Qualifications to be submitted, consultant selection, and approval of consultant by Town Council. Bids will be requested during this time each scope item. The Project Architect and Town of Oro Valley Project Manager will closely review all bids and select the contractors, if not utilizing Town staff for selected labor. The earliest that construction work will commence is mid-December 2008. 26 Project Scope Forms Scope Item: Site Grading/Drainage Component of Scope Material#of Units OR Material Unit Cost OR Subtotal Total Component Item Labor#of Hours Labor Hourly Rate Cost w/ contingency Re-grade @ foundation 1 2000 Allowed $2,000 $2,400 Splash Block/ Rip Rap 2 450$/unit $1,800 $2,160 Total: $4,560 Scope Item: Demolition Component of Scope Material#of Units OR Material Unit Cost OR Subtotal Total Component Item Labor#of Hours Labor Hourly Rate Cost w/ contingency Demolish existing additions 1 7500 Allowed $7,500 $9,000.00 Demolish interior 1 2500 Allowed $2,500 $3,000.00 Total: $12,000.00 Scope Item: Foundation Component of Scope Material#of Units OR Material Unit Cost OR Subtotal Total Component Item Labor#of Hours Labor Hourly Rate Cost w/ contingency Patch existing slab 1770 2.5$/SF $4,425.00 $5,310.00 Porch slab 1038 5.5$/SF $5,709.00 $6,850.80 Porch Post Footing 10 550$/unit $5,500.00 $6,600.00 Turn down @ Porch 145 15$/ linear foot $2,175.00 $2,610.00 Total: $21,370.80 97 Scope Item: Exterior Walls Component of Scope Material#of Units OR Material Unit Cost OR Subtotal Total Component Item Labor#of Hours Labor Hourly Rate Cost w/ contingency Repair/stabilize existing 1 35000 Allowed $35,000.00 $42,000.00 Stucco Patch 2076 5$/SF $10,380.00 $12,456.00 Paint stucco 2076 .85$/SF $1,765.00 $2,118.00 Total: $56,574.00 Scope Item: Exterior Doors Component of Scope Material#of Units OR Material Unit Cost OR Subtotal Total Component Item Labor#of Hours Labor Hourly Rate Cost w/ contingency Single Door 6 1700$/unit $10,200 $12,240.00 Door hardware 6 750$/Unit $4,500 $5,400.00 Finish Door 6 150$/Unit $900 $1,080 I Total: $18,720.00 Scope Item: Exterior Windows Component of Scope Material#of Units OR Material Unit Cost OR Subtotal Total Component Item Labor#of Hours Labor Hourly Rate Cost w/ contingency Window 10 12000$/unit $12,000 $14,400.00 Finish Windows 250$/Unit 2500$/Unit $2,500 $3,000.00 Total: $17,400.00 28 Scope Item: Roof Framing Component of Scope Material#of Units OR Material Unit Cost OR Subtotal Total Component Item Labor#of Hours Labor Hourly Rate Cost w/ contingency Upgrade Roof Frame 1859 5.5$/SF $10,225.00 $12,270.00 Rework Dormer 2 650$/Unit $1,300.00 $1,560.00 Porch Framing 1090 3.5$/SF $3,815.00 $4,578.00 Porch Posts 10 300$/unit $3,000.00 $3,600.00 Roof Sheathing 2948 2.25 $/SF $6,633.00 $7,959.60 Paint/Finish Eve/Porch 1 1800 Allowed $1,800.00 $2,160.00 Total: $32,127.60 Scope Item: Roofing Component of Scope Material#of Units OR Material Unit Cost OR Subtotal Total Component Item Labor#of Hours Labor Hourly Rate Cost w/ contingency Rolled Roof/Corrugated Metal 2948 3.5$/SF $10,318.00 $12,381.60 Roof Installation 1859 1.15$/SF $2,138.00 $2,565.60 Flashing 212 6.5$/Linear Feet $1,378.00 $1,653.60 Rework Chimney 6 2000$/Unit $12,000.00 $14,400.00 Total: $31,000.80 Scope Item: Interior Walls Component of Scope Material#of Units OR Material Unit Cost OR Subtotal Total Component Item Labor#of Hours Labor Hourly Rate Cost w/ contingency Patch Walls 1 5500 Allow $5,500.00 $6,600.00 99 Paint walls 2688 .85$/Sf $2,285.00 $2,742.00 Total: $9,342.00 Scope Item: Interior Doors Component of Scope Material#of Units OR Material Unit Cost OR Subtotal Total Component Item Labor#of Hours Labor Hourly Rate Cost w/ contingency Single Door 6 1200$/Unit $7,200.00 $8,640.00 Door Hardware 6 350$/Unit $2,100.00 $2,520.00 Finish Door 6 115$/Unit $690.00 $828.00 Total: $11,988.00 Scope Item: Flooring Component of Scope Material#of Units OR Material Unit Cost OR Subtotal Total Component Item Labor#of Hours Labor Hourly Rate Cost w/ contingency Wood Flooring 1170 8.5$/SF $9,945.00 $11,934.00 Wood Base 336 5.5$/Linear feet $1,848.00 $2,217.60 Total: $14,151.60 Scope Item: Ceilings Component of Scope Material#of Units OR Material Unit Cost OR Subtotal Total Component Item Labor#of Hours Labor Hourly Rate Cost w/ contingency Patch Ceilings 1170 4.5$/SF $5,265.00 $6,318.00 Paint Ceilings 1170 .85$/SF $995.00 $1,194.00 Total: $7,512.00 30 Scope Item: Specialties Component of Scope Material#of Units OR Material Unit Cost OR Subtotal Total Component Item Labor#of Hours Labor Hourly Rate Cost w/ contingency Tackboard/DMB 1 2500 Allow $2,500.00 $3,000.00 Total: $3,000.00 Scope Item: Fire Protection Component of Scope Material#of Units OR Material Unit Cost OR Subtotal Total Component Item Labor#of Hours Labor Hourly Rate Cost w/ contingency Fire Sprinkler System 1770 3.75$/SF $6,638.00 $7,965.60 Total: $7,965.60 Scope Item: HVAC Component of Scope Material#of Units OR Material Unit Cost OR Subtotal Total Component Item Labor#of Hours Labor Hourly Rate Cost w/ contingency AC/Gas Heat 1770 13$SF $23,010.00 $27,612.00 Climate Control Archive 195 3.5$/SF $683.00 $819.60 Total: $28,431.60 Scope Item: Electrical Component of Scope Material#of Units OR Material Unit Cost OR Subtotal Total Component Item Labor#of Hours Labor Hourly Rate Cost w/ contingency 31 Upgrade Service 1 3500 Allow $3,500.00 $4,200.00 New Lighting 1770 3.5$/SF $6,195.00 $7,434.00 New Power 1770 2.5$/SF $4,425.00 $5,310.00 Motor Connection/Power 1770 2.75$/SF $4,868.00 $5,841.60 Telecommunication 1770 1.8$/SF $3,186.00 $3,823.20 FA/Security 1770 4.25$/SF $7,523.00 $9,027.60 Total: $35,636.40 Subtotal: $311,780.40 Scope Item: Subtotal items Subtotal: Component of Scope Material#of Units OR Material Unit Cost OR Subtotal Total Component Item Labor#of Hours Labor Hourly Rate Cost General Conditions 1 15% $46,766.00 $46,766.00 Contractors fee 1 6% $21,513.00 $21,513.00 Bonds and Insurance 1 4% $15,202.00 $15,202.00 Sales Tax 1 6.57% $25,949.00 $25,949.00 Total: $109,430.00 Grand total: $421,210.40 32 Page intentionally left blank 33 Appendices Insert all documents and pages referenced in grant proposal. 34