Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPackets - Historic Preservation Commission (115) AGENDA Oro Valley Historic Preservation Commission Monday, December 8, 2008 Town of Oro Valley Council Chambers 11000 N. La Canada Drive I. Call to Order: at or after 5:00 p.m. II. Roll Call. III. Call to the Audience. IV. Approval of Minutes a. November 10, 2008 V. Discussion and possible action regarding HPC Work Plan. a. Cultural Resource Inventory Plan b. Community Outreach c. CLG Application d. Budget e. Process Plan for Historic Designation f. Training g. Santa Cruz Heritage Alliance VI. Discussion and possible action regarding Steam Pump Ranch. a. Historic garden project b. Arizona Centennial project c. National Register Nomination d. SOP governing actions to be taken at SPR e. Pumphouse f. Security VII. Discussion and possible action regarding Town Council appointment process and terms of appointment to Boards and Commissions (as it effects the Historic Preservation Commission). VIII.Discussion of Honey Bee Village. IX. Discussion and possible action regarding National Alliance of Preservation Commissions. X. Announcements. XI. Items for future agendas. XII. Adjourn. POSTED: 12 05 08 4:00 p.m. cp The Town of Oro Valley complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA). If any person(s) with a disability needs any type of accommodation, please notify the Town Clerk's office at(520) 229-4700. INSTRUCTIONS TO SPEAKERS Members of the public have the right to speak during any posted public hearing. However, those items not listed as a public hearing are for consideration and action by the Commission during thecourse of their business meeting. Members of the public may be allowed to speak on these topics at the discretion of the Chair. If you wish to address the Commission on any item(s) on this agenda, please complete a speaker card located on the Agenda table at the back of the room and give it to the Recording Secretary. Please indicate on the speaker card which item number and topic you wish to speak on, or if you wish to speak during "Call to Audience", please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. Please step forward to the podium when the Chair announces the item(s) on the agenda which you are interested in addressing. 1. For the record, please state your name and whether or not you are a Town resident.. 2. Speak only on the issue currently being discussed by Commission. Please organize your speech, you will only be allowed to address the Commission once regarding the topic being discussed. 3. Please limit your comments to 3 minutes. 4. During "Call to Audience" you may address the Commission on any issue you wish. 5. Any member of the public speaking must speak in a courteous and respectful manner to those present. Thank you for your cooperation. "Notice of Possible Quorum of the Oro Valley Town Council and Planning and Zoning Commission: In accordance with Chapter 3, Title 38, Arizona Revised Statutes and Section 2-4-2 of the Oro Valley Town Code, a majority of the Town Council or Commissions may attend the above referenced meeting as a member of the audience only." DRAFT MINUTES ORO VALLEY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION REGULAR SESSION November 10, 2008 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE I. Call to Order: at or after 5:00 p.m. II. Roll Call. PRESENT: Chair Bob Baughman Vice Chair Daniel Zwiener Commissioner Pat Spoerl Commissioner Patrick Foley Commissioner Valeria Pullara Commission Lois Nagy Also Present: Scott Nelson, Special Projects Coordinator Lexa Mack, Town Attorney Salette Latas, Council Member Diane Chapman, Senior Office Specialist III. Call to the Audience opened and closed with no speakers. IV. Approval of Minutes. a. August 11, 2008 - Chair Baughman asked that "State Historian" be deleted after Jim Garrison's name. MOTION: Vice Chair Zwiener MOVED to approve the August 11, 2008, Historic Preservation Commission minutes as corrected. Commissioner Nagy seconded the motion. Motion carried, 6:0. b. September 8, 2008 - Chair Baughman asked that spelling of Joyce Rychener's name be corrected throughout the minutes. - Commissioner Spoerl said on page 3, 4th paragraph, last sentence change to "This should not have an impact on our nomination to the National Register." MOTION: Commissioner Nagy MOVED to accept the September 8, 2008, with the corrections discussed above. Commissioner Foley seconded the motion. Motion carried, 6:0. November 10, 2008 Draft Historic Preservation Commission Minutes c. October 6, 2008 - Commissioner Spoerl said on page 3, middle of thea p ge, paragraph starting Mr. Nelson said there was a communityarden originally planted,g y p ted, the word planted should be changed to planned. MOTION: Vice Chair Zwiener MOVED to approve the October ctober 6, 2008, Historic Preservation Commission minutes as corrected. Commissioner ssioner Spoerl seconded the motion. Motion carried, 6:0. V. Discussion and possible action regarding Steam Pump g Ranch. a. Historic garden project Commissioner Spoerl, speaking as President of the Oro ValleySociety Historical Society (OVHS), said at the September meeting the OVHSa resented historical istorical garden proposal for Steam Pump Ranch (SPR), specifically a pioneer garden to be located near the Pusch ranch house, for input and comment. No action was taken for endorsement or support. That discussion brought upthe issue of how projects projects may be approved at SPR. At the October Commission meeting, it was recorded that at the Town Manager could approve proposals and projects for SPR if theywith 1 were e e consistent withe Master Plan (MP). Since that time, the Town Manager's office, Legal egal Department and the Historical Society havebeen working on a license agreement forpioneer the pioneer garden. The Town Council will need to review and approve that agreement pp g ement since it is a contract between the OVHS and the Town. This is on the agenda tonight g g to give the HPC an opportunity for any action or further comment before the license agreement goes to the Council. The garden proposal is basicallythe same as the draft already presented. a eady It would be beneficial to start the garden as soon as is conceivably possible, considering safety issues, etc., because it would be a very good publicity vehicle for r SPR. The consultants have identified a 90 foot area surroundingthe . . ranch house as archaeologically sensitive. That factor needs to be considered in locatingthe t e garden. If historic items are found, the garden wouldn't go there. Mr. Nelson said the greenhouse was originallyscheduled to be removed ' 2 months. within the next HPC sending forward this item forward to Council without recommendation is not necessarily a negative. Add to the list for resources: Seed Savers Exchange, Technicians for Sustainability (contact Lincoln Parino), the Tohono O'odham Nation, and the USDA Agricultural Resources. The license agreement will give 2 access codes to the gate, one for project the project director and one for the President of will Society. One of those two individuals be required to be present whenever there is any activityoin on. g g November 10, 2008 Draft Historic Preservation Commission Minutes MOTION: Commissioner Nagy MOVED to send a recommendation to the Town Council that the HPC does endorse a historicgarden at Steam . Pump Ranch. `Vice Chair Zwiener seconded the motion. Motion carried: 6:0. b. Arizona Centennial project There was discussion on possible projects for the Arizona Centennial Project t regarding: - Timing - Accessibility to public - What needs to be done - Uniqueness - Enduring project - What other communities are doing - Honey Bee Village versus Steam Pump Ranch - SPR more interesting now - Recommendation from HPC to Council There is a workshop in May, 2009, that will focus on the annual Arizona Centennial. It would be beneficial is an HPC member attended. The HPC should send a recommendation on to the Council specifying what the project should be. Vice Chair Zwiener recommended SPR be the focus of HPC's legacy project y j p ect application and volunteered to prepare an outline of thej roect for the next HPC C meeting. c. National Register Nomination The consultant for SPR has submitted the National Register application g to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) and the review and comment erio. period will be six months. A copy will be sent to HPC members. d. SOP governing actions to be taken at SPR Once the SPR MP was adopted there was no process inlace for running g the Ranch. The archaeologists on HPC should be overseeing each project. The Commission should have an involved role in regards to historical sites and be able to make recommendations to the Council. HPC needs to draft an SOP regarding this. g g There are concerns about contamination from rodents at the sight. The Town Manager felt it was important to clean up the sight without disturbinganything ' ,. y g that shouldn't be disturbed. Cieaning up and securing the sight against further intrusion from the rodents is a priority as this is a health and safety concern. 3 November 10, 2008 Draft Historic Preservation Commission Minutes There needs to be a balance of safety concerns and still preserve . p e history. HPC might make a recommendation on how to do the clean up and preserve the historical nature of the sight. The Commission may want to authorize two members of the Commission mmission to serve as stewards/wardens for site. Council Member Latas thought that might be a good possibility, but no particular person should be written into the operating procedures. It is important to have the same expertise continuing, but if not, to be able to hire a consultant. HPC should draft a procedure broad enough to come upwith different solutions as needed, but strict enough to protect all historic sites, and recommend to Council for approval. Commissioner Spoerl suggested that if the draft were developed through ough a study session involving the entire Commission it could count as training. g Chair Baughman asked Mr. Nelson to schedule a studysession include to Councsl Member Latas, HPC and himself. e. Pumphouse The ADOT Transportation Grant was not successful at State level. PimaAssociation Association of Governments staff said there were concerns over SHPO'sposition . o on treatment. Also funding was cut by 25/o. Other options will be looked at this coming year. Regarding security, the bicycle patrol will not work from the Ranch. The Police Department helped locate lighting that would help when they patrol. There are no concerns at this time with workers contracted at the Ranch. No items of historic value have been taken that he is aware of. There is concern about the rate of deterioration of the .um houseWithout p p tout the ADOT grant there needs to be a plan based on Jim Garrison's recommendations of how to preserve the pumphouse. Mr. Nelson can report on what has been recommended by the experts at the next meeting, but he will not bereared to report on p p p costs and funding. Aside from restoration, to make it last longest as a ruin, is to build aer p manent canopy over the top to keep the elements from hitting the sides. An alternate solution would be a temporary shelter, which we would need to know the cost to construct. VI. Discussion and possible action regarding protocol for confidential g information. 4 November 10, 2008 Draft Historic Preservation Commission Minutes The Arizona public records law is an exemption for public records that relate to the location of archaeological findings, discoveries, or sights that may be eligible for the Arizona Register of Historic laces. It is left within the discretion oublic office which would be the Town Manager, whether or not information should b redacted or pu is records requests be refuse ased on the fact that it contains information described in the statute. It also allows for consultation with SHPO whether information should be withheld or not. Ms. Mack spoke with Carol Griffith, Deputy Director Archaeologist at - SHPO, Linda Mayro of Pima County, and the preservation officer for Scottsdale, and asked if they were aware of any jurisdiction in Arizona with a policy above what State Statutes provide. Their responses were they follow State law. SHPO commented that homes placed on the National Register cannot be kept confidential. It is still trespassing if people go on private property, but they can't keep people from viewing from the outside and can't keep the address private. Chair Baughman recommended HPC do nothing further regarding this issue. VII. Discussion of Honey Bee Village. The Honey Bee Village Master Plan will be distributed to HPC. HBV discussion will be delayed until next month. VIII. Discussion and possible action regarding HPC Work Plan. a. CLG Application A voice message was received from Bob Frankenberger about concerns on two items Mr. Spaeth was able to address. 1. When the application was submitted we had two Commissioners who are no longer on the Commissioner which needed to be updated. /OA c/tp',.L. vitt,---4,,)_-,4 : b. Cultural Resource Inventory Plan. Commissioner Nagy received information from other communities on how they handle inventories. We need to address what we want to do and whether to hire a consultant. Some areas of work could be done by our Commissioners. State Historical libraryis open to public for research. We need to know how much money is available and how to spend it. We have homework to do first. There are other things in the Town that would be simple to inventory and take very little funds, i.e. older neighborhoods. Cultural inventory means inventorying all potential sites. Mr. Nelson said the Town Council has budgeted $50,000 for consulting on this item. If HPC produced a scope of work, then an RFP would be put together with our Procurement Department. A work study session on this matter is scheduled for February. 5 November 10, 2008 Draft Historic Preservation Commission Minutes Chair Baughman asked Commissioners Spoerl, Zwiener, and Nagyto email Diane Chapman their thoughts to be forwarded to the Commissioners. This will bep ut first on our next agenda to address. c. Budget - No report. d. Community Outreach Commissioner Pullara said she had done some internet research to find other areas outreach plans. She has a good format, but needs guidance on where tog o from here. Chair Baughman asked Commissioner Pullara to send the information to Diane Chapman to be forwarded to HPC. This should be put second on the next meeting agenda. Commissioner Pullara will be out of town for several meetings and willartici ate via phone. p p e. Process Plan for Historic Designation - no report. f. Training Commissioner Foley reported board members are required to do 16 hours of training per term. Citizen Planning Institute is available every year. Special training at meetings includes Skylark Consulting and Mr. Garrison's presentation. Other Commissions or groups also offer training. There is also the May 29th Centennial Workshop. Chair Baughman would like to see an ongoing training calendar. Once the new member is on board the Legal Department could do training on Prop. 207 and the open meeting g law. g. Santa Cruz Heritage Alliance Commissioner Pullara attended the Santa Cruz Heritage Alliance meeting last Friday. Y They have been working on a new Southwest Food Alliance, which is revitalizing multi- cultural farming and ranching, which the SPR gardens might fit into. The National Heritage Area is up for vote with the Senate and is Bill # 2213 on November 17. They encouraged members to contact their Senator prior to November 17 to let them know how they feel. Chair Baughman asked Commissioner Pullara to put together a brief memo with information needed to write to our Senators. IX. Discussion and possible action regarding National Alliance of Preservation Commissions. 6-( ( CA.a; Mr. Nelson said Marty McCune has taken care of changing contact informatio for HPC. November 10, 2008 Draft Historic Preservation Commission Minutes X. Announcements. - On November 19 Town Council will consider a Heritage Grant Agreement and Conservation Easement for funding of the Heritage Grant of$111,600 to go towards more than matching funds from County bonds, and a $28,000 contribution from the general fund to go towards the restoration process of the 1870's ranch house. Mr. Nelson showed the sign to go along with that. - Last Thursday, Chair Baughman, Mr. Nelson, Pamela Pelletier, and Andrew from Poster Frost received the APA AZ award for Best Historic Landmark, Steam Pump Ranch Master Plan. XI. Items for future agendas. No additional items. XII. Adjourn. MOTION: Vice Chair Zwiener MOVED to adjourn the Historic Preservation Commission meeting. Commission Spoerl seconded the motion. Motion carried, 6:0. The meeting adjourned at 7:10 p.m. Prepared by: ii\V_ cLutiL., � lane Chapman `f= Senior Office Specialist` Page 1 of 1 Chapman, Diane From: Mack, Alexandra Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 10:36 AM To: 'Bob Baughman' Cc: Chapman, Diane Subject: Proposed changes to HPC ordinance Bob- Here are the proposed changes. They come with a couple of caveats, though.... First, Council has not seen these yet as far as I know so they are subject to change. Second, as I said, the plan is to have Council initiate the code amendments in January, at which time they may direct staff to make other changes that are not reflected, I guess that's really just one caveat since it boils down to the same thing. By way of background, the policy changes suggested are that all terms go to 2 years to begin August 1 of each year following an election. The new policy would take effect in 2009 with each Council member making a one year appointment to each board and commission. After the 2010 election, new appointments would be made for the full two year term. Let me know if you have questions. Lexa PS— Diane, Bob asked if you could print this out for him and he will pick it up along with the other things being printed. Thanks. B. Term of Office. 1. Membership appointment to the Commission shall be for a period of three (3) two (2) years. Terms shall be staggered so that no more than three (3) members' terms shall expire in any given year. All terms shall begin on July 1st and shall end on June 30th or until a successor is appointed and qualified. 2. In the event of a resignation, removal or death of a member, the Council shall fill the vacancy for the unexpired term. 3. The Council may remove any member of the Commission by a majority vote of the majority of the Council, or as otherwise provided by ordinance or Town Code. Le MRCk' Civil Attorney Town of Oro Valley 11000 N. La Canada Dr. Oro Valley, AZ 85737 (520) 229-4758 12/04/2008 Proposal for 2012 Arizona Centennial Celebration at Steam Pump Ranch Since its establishment in 1874 by German immigrants George Pusch and Johann Zellweger, Steam Pump Ranch has been and continues to be a vital contributor to the growth and development of southern Arizona. The Town of Oro Valley, in conjunction with Pima County, have seen fit to preserve and protect that history by purchasing this property and finalizing a master plan for its development into a showcase to better understanding our connection to the past. Since George Pusch himself played a role in the formation of our state as a member of the Territorial Legislature, it is fitting that our town should include Steam Pump Ranch in the state's Centennial Celebration. Since the Master Plan calls for opening the ranch in some form by 2012, this celebration could be both a practical and fundamental event in its future development. In the process, Oro Valley would soon realize the value of Steam Pump as a symbol of its connection to the history of the region. In the fall of 2004, Arizona's Governor and Legislature designated the Arizona Historical Advisory Commission to plan and implement the state's Centennial Celebration. Since then, a statewide plan for Arizona's Centennial has been evolving. As a part of its mission, this commission has been recommending and funding activities and projects that will ensure a lasting legacy to commemorate the Centennial. We believe that Steam Pump Ranch would go a long way toward perpetuating this legacy. To be considered for official designation as a Legacy Project and therefore the possibility of funding opportunities, the Centennial Celebration at Steam Pump must: 1. Accurately portray a significant aspect of Arizona history. 2. Be accessible to large numbers of visitors and users. 3. Demonstrate collaboration in the planning. 4. Produce an enduring product that will live on after 2012. 5. Include an educational component. 6. Include a plan for implementation. In due course, Steam Pump Ranch will meet these criteria. In order to start the process of applying for and receiving official designation as an Arizona Legacy Project, it is proposed that the Oro Valley Historic Preservation Commission, in cooperation with numerous other groups, have a key role in formulating a plan that would be recommended to the Oro Valley Town Council. With the approval of the Town Council, the Historic Preservation Commission would complete the application to the Centennial Programs Committee to begin the process of certification and possible funding assistance for this project. It is also proposed that members of the Oro Valley Historic Preservation Commission as well as other members of town government attend the 2009 Annual Arizona Centennial Workshop planned for May 21-22. According to the Arizona Centennial Plan "Benchmark 2007", local governments will have a primary responsibility to stimulate and sponsor projects. The Arizona Historical Advisory Commission may make grants to local governments or organizations that sponsor the official projects after procedural approval by the Legislative Council. The master plan for the ranch states "we now have the means to tell these important Steam Pump Ranch stories in a setting that can preserve its significance and integrity." Its significance is only enhanced when it becomes a vital part of our state's Centennial Celebration. Daniel C. Zwiener Vice Chair Oro Valley Historic Preservation Commission HPC Inventory Historical things that occur in Oro Valley Comments by Lois Nagy The Town of Ovo Valley has given the HPC $50,000 to be used for the Historic Preservation Inventory. In order to best utilize these funds the HPC needs to discuss what is to be inventoried first and in what depth and detail. Some historical things are interesting but are of less importance. Some library research might be done by Commission Members, thus freeing a Consultant to do tasks that we can not do. Research facilities we might use are the library of the AZ Historical Society and library of the AZ State Museum. This museum has the largest collection of Hohokam pottery in the world. Also the library of the U.of A. Architectural Dept., might be useful. (All of these are located on or around the U. of A. Campus). As the inventory proceeds, we will probably find things that we didn't know existed and other things that were just over-looked. Historical Things in Oro Valley to Inventory: Things of Major Historical Importance: Steam Pump Ranch & land Honey Bee Archaeological Village Hohokam petroglyphs/rock art occur at: Honey Bee Canyon Catalina State Park-Romero Ruin In& around Stone Canyon Golf Course Things of Minor Historical Importance: Titan Missile Site—Oracle Rd. —now a church Oro Valley Country Club & Golf Course - built 1958 Oro Valley Country Club Estates— 1959 First residential sub-division Kelley Ranch House— designed by Josias Joesler in the 1930's. Countess of Suffolk's home—built 1934 The Apaches roamed freely on OV land in the 1800's and up until the early 1900's, this needs to be researched. There were several pioneer ranching families in OV in the 1920's & 1930's, this needs to be researched. Surveys -- Notes Survey -- a process of identifying and gathering data on a community's historic resources. Includes: -- field survey- the physical search for and recording of historic resources on the ground, -- planning and background research before field survey begins An inventory is one of the basic products of a survey. An inventory is an organized compilation of information on those properties that are evaluated as significant. Evaluation is the process of determining whether identified properties meet defined criteria of historical, architectural, archeological, or cultural significance. In other words, evaluation involves winnowing the survey data to produce an inventory. Why conduct an historic resource survey? To identify important historic resources in Oro Valley. The information obtained by a survey can provide unique insights into a community's past, and can form the basis for making sound judgments in community planning. Survey data can be used to create a preservation plan in which significant historic resources are recommended for preservation. It can lead to an increased understanding and public awareness of a community's historic landmarks and a greater commitment to preserving them. To make effective use of historic resources, to respect their value and extend their lives, it is necessary to integrate historic preservation into community planning. This is the immediate reason for undertaking a local historic resources survey: to gather the information needed to plan for the wise use of a community's resources. A historic resources survey can define the historic character of a community or a particular area and can provide the basis for making sound judgments in community planning.. Survey data can be used to construct a preservation plan that helps the community identify the historic, cultural, aesthetic, and visual relationships that unify and define its component areas, and to establish policies,procedures, and strategies for maintaining and enhancing them. It can lead to an increased understanding and awareness of the human environment by officials and citizens within the community and an increased commitment to preserving it. Kinds of Surveys Survey can be conducted at a variety of scales,producing different kinds of survey data applicable to different needs. Reconnaissance survey--a "once over lightly" inspection of an area,most useful for characterizing its resources in general and for developing a basis for deciding how to organize and orient more detailed survey efforts. In conjunction with a general review of pertinent literature on the community's past, a reconnaissance may involve such activities as: A "windshield survey" of the community-literally driving around the community and noting the general distribution of buildings, structures, and neighborhoods representing different architectural styles, periods, and modes of construction. a "walkover" archeological inspection, perhaps coupled with small-scale test excavations, to get a general idea of the archeological potential of portions of the community. a study of aerial photographs, historical and recent maps and city plans, soil surveys, and other sources of information that help gain a general understanding of the community's layout and environment at different times in its history. Intensive survey -- a close and careful look at the area being surveyed. It is designed to identify precisely and completely all historic resources in the area. It generally involves detailed background research, and a thorough inspection and documentation of all historic properties in the field. It should produce all the infonnation needed to evaluate historic properties and prepare an inventory. Reconnaissance and intensive survey are often conducted in sequence, with reconnaissance being used in planning intensive survey. They are also sometimes combined, with intensive survey directed at locations where background research indicates a likely high concentration of historic resources and reconnaissance directed at areas where fewer resources can be expected, They can also be combined with reference to different resource types: for example, in a given area it may be appropriate to conduct an intensive survey of buildings and structures but only a reconnaissance with reference to archeological sites, while in another area archeological sites may require intensive survey while buildings need only a "once over lightly" examination. • Historic Contexts. Together with the community's planning and development priorities, and its available personnel and financial resources,historic contexts are the most influential factors in defining the structure of a survey effort. A historic context is a broad pattern of historical development in a community or its region that may be represented by historic resources. The importance of taking historic contexts into account cannot be overemphasized. Failure to do so can lead to the application of survey methods that are not cost-effective, that fail to identify significant resources, or that contain uncontrolled biases. P. Spoerl Cultural Resources Survey for Town of Oro Valley Ideas for Proposed Scope of Work DRAFT Pat Spoerl Historic Preservation Commission December 8, 2008 The scope of work is to inventory historic properties in the Town of Oro Valley. This information will be used to better plan for the preservation and promotion of the Town's cultural resources and heritage. Benefits of Survey include: • Enables forward looking, proactive preservation ® Helps identify areas where preservation needs to take place • Describes character-defining features in community • Helps inform Commission deliberations This project will provide an inventory of the Town's cultural resources (prehistoric and historic). These cultural resources will be briefly described in terms of historic contexts developed in the state of Arizona or in terms of historic contexts (particularly "recent past" that may be developed for the Town. A two phase project is proposed. Phase 1: Records Search Phase 2: "Windshield" Survey and historic property documentation. Phase 1: Records Search This phase will provide an initial overview of cultural resources within current Town boundaries (and any being considered for annexation?) including: • Records Search--AZSITE 9 Review of Pima County and TOV records for construction dates of built structures. ® Identify priorities for Phase 2 and present to HPC and public. Consultant will perform a records review of all existing materials relevant to historic properties within the current Town boundaries. This review will include review of all sites listed in the AZSITE data base andp rovide the Town with a copy of the listing and map. Review Pima County records for information on construction dates of historic structures. Resources kept by local repositories, such as a local historical society, courthouse, library or Town of Oro Valley property records may also be useful. Consultant will make a list of all structures built before 1970. The HPC will review and determine which of these will be further recorded on Arizona inventory forms in Phase 2. Most of those recorded will have construction dates prior to 1960. Phase 2: "Windshield Survey and Documentation. • Historic property inventory within original Town boundaries delineated in 1974 (eg specific neighborhoods to include Catalina Shadows, Oro Valley Country Club). ® Documentation of priority historic structures identified in Phase 1. The project will minimally document the physical characteristics of each structure and will assign a preservation priority to each property to better assess its relative architectural and/or historic significance in the context of the Town's physical development. Additional Considerations 1. An important component of the project is informing the public of the project. Note: Do we want to include possibility of volunteers assisting in the project?? 2. Consultant will provide a PowerPoint presentation to the Historic Preservation Commission and to the Town Council. The public will be encouraged to attend these presentations and provide comments. 3. Consultant must meet the professional qualifications for historian or architectural historian as specified by the Secretary of the Interior in accordance with 36CFR66. 4. Consultant will use standards set forth by AZ SHPO. The consultant will note whether the property is potentially eligible for individual listing in the National Register (and for designation as a Landmark or part of a Historic District). Survey Products. D Cultural Resources Inventory ❑ Photographs of historic sites documented ❑ Project Area Maps ❑ Survey report including brief historic contexts ❑ Computer Data Historic Context The survey report should include a narrative that places the origins and development of Oro Valley in its historic context. It should be organized in a chronological fashion but include social, political, ethnic and economic factors that influenced the physical development of the city. The overall role of the town's setting along the Canada del Oro and adjacent to Tucson should also be mentioned in this brief history. Some Historic Contexts: --Prehistoric Water Utilization and Technology --Homesteading in Arizona --Tucson— Growth of the Tucson Metropolitan Area, 1947-73 DRAFT AGENDA Oro Valley Historic Preservation Commission Monday,December 8,2008 Town of Oro Valley Council Chambers 11000 N. La Canada Drive I. Call to Order: at or after 5:00 p.m. II. Roll Call. —c. III. Call to the Audience. IV. Approval of Minutes a. November 10, 2008 V. Discussion and possible action regarding HPC Work Plan. a. Cultural Resource Inventory Plan b. Community Outreach c. CLG Application d. Budget e. Process Plan for Historic Designation f. Training g. Santa Cruz Heritage Alliance VI. Discussion and possible action regarding Steam Pump Ranch. a. Historic garden project b. Arizona Centennial project c. National Register Nomination d. SOP governing actions to be taken at SPR e. Pumphouse f. Security VII. Discussion and possible action regarding Town Council appointment process and terms of appointment to Boards and Commissions (as it effects the Historic Preservation Commission). VIII.Discussion of Honey Bee Village. IX. Discussion and possible action regarding National Alliance of Preservation Commissions. X. Announcements. XI. Items for future agendas. XII. Adjourn. POSTED: 12 05 08 4:00 p.m. cp The Town of Oro Valley complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA). If any person(s) with a disability needs any type of accommodation, please notify the Town Clerk's office at (520) 229-4700. INSTRUCTIONS TO SPEAKERS Members of the public have the right to speak during any posted public hearing. However, those items not listed as a public hearing are for consideration and action by the Commission during the course of their business meeting. Members of the public may be allowed to speak on these topics at the discretion of the Chair. If you wish to address the Commission on any item(s) on this agenda, please complete a speaker card located on the Agenda table at the back of the room and give it to the Recording Secretary. Please indicate on the speaker card which item number and topic you wish to speak on, or if you wish to speak during "Call to Audience", please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. Please step forward to the podium when the Chair announces the item(s) on the agenda which you are interested in addressing. 1. For the record, please state your name and whether or not you are a Town resident.. 2. Speak only on the issue currently being discussed by Commission. Please organize your speech, you will only be allowed to address the Commission once regarding the topic being discussed. 3. Please limit your comments to 3 minutes. 4. During "Call to Audience"you may address the Commission on any issue you wish. 5. Any member of the public speaking must speak in a courteous and respectful manner to those present. Thank you for your cooperation. "Notice of Possible Quorum of the Oro Valley Town Council and Planning and Zoning Commission: In accordance with Chapter 3, Title 38, Arizona Revised Statutes and Section 2-4-2 of the Oro Valley Town Code, a majority of the Town Council or Commissions may attend the above referenced meeting as a member of the audience only." DRAFT MINUTES ORO VALLEY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION REGULAR SESSION November 10, 2008 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE I. Call to Order: at or after 5:00 p.m. II. Roll Call. PRESENT: Chair Bob Baughman Vice Chair Daniel Zwiener Commissioner Pat Spoerl Commissioner Patrick Foley Commissioner Valeria Pullara Commission Lois Nagy Also Present: Scott Nelson, Special Projects Coordinator Lexa Mack, Town Attorney Salette Latas, Council Member Diane Chapman, Senior Office Specialist III. Call to the Audience opened and closed with no speakers. IV. Approval of Minutes. a. August 11, 2008 - Chair Baughman asked that "State Historian" be deleted after Jim Garrison's name. MOTION: Vice Chair Zwiener MOVED to approve the August 11, 2008, Historic Preservation Commission minutes as corrected. Commissioner Nagy seconded the motion. Motion carried, 6:0. b. September 8, 2008 - Chair Baughman asked that spelling of Joyce Rychener's name be corrected throughout the minutes. - Commissioner Spoerl said on page 3, 4th paragraph, last sentence change to "This should not have an impact on our nomination to the National Register." MOTION: Commissioner Nagy MOVED to accept the September 8, 2008, with the corrections discussed above. Commissioner Foley seconded the motion. Motion carried, 6:0. November 10, 2008 Draft Historic Preservation Commission Minutes c. October 6, 2008 - Commissioner Spoerl said on page 3, middle of the page, paragraph starting Mr. Nelson said there was a community garden originally planted, the word planted should be changed to planned. MOTION: Vice Chair Zwiener MOVED to approve the October 6, 2008, Historic Preservation Commission minutes as corrected. Commissioner Spoerl seconded the motion. Motion carried, 6:0. V. Discussion and possible action regarding Steam Pump Ranch. a. Historic garden project Commissioner Spoerl, speaking as President of the Oro Valley Historical Society (OVHS), said at the September meeting the OVHS presented a historical garden proposal for Steam Pump Ranch (SPR), specifically a pioneer garden to be located near the Pusch ranch house, for input and comment. No action was taken for endorsement or support. That discussion brought up the issue of how projects may be approved at SPR. At the October Commission meeting, it was recorded that the Town Manager could approve proposals and projects for SPR if they were consistent with the Master Plan (MP). Since that time, the Town Manager's office, Legal Department and the Historical Society have been working on a license agreement for the pioneer garden. The Town Council will need to review and approve that agreement since it is a contract between the OVHS and the Town. This is on the agenda tonight to give the HPC an opportunity for any action or further comment before the license agreement goes to the Council. The garden proposal is basically the same as the draft already presented. It would be beneficial to start the garden as soon as is conceivably possible, considering safety issues, etc., because it would be a very good publicity vehicle for SPR. The consultants have identified a 90 foot area surrounding the ranch house as archaeologically sensitive. That factor needs to be considered in locating the garden. If historic items are found, the garden wouldn't go there. Mr. Nelson said the greenhouse was originally scheduled to be removed within the next 2 months. HPC sending forward this item forward to Council without recommendation is not necessarily a negative. Add to the list for resources: Seed Savers Exchange, Technicians for Sustainability (contact Lincoln Parino), the Tohono O'odham Nation, and the USDA Agricultural Resources. The license agreement will give 2 access codes to the gate, one for the project director and one for the President of the Society. One of those two individuals will be required to be present whenever there is any activity going on. 2 November 10, 2008 Draft Historic Preservation Commission Minutes MOTION: Commissioner Nagy MOVED to send a recommendation to the Town Council that the HPC does endorse a historic garden at Steam Pump Ranch. Vice Chair Zwiener seconded the motion. Motion carried: 6:0. b. Arizona Centennial project There was discussion on possible projects for the Arizona Centennial Project regarding: - Timing - Accessibility to public - What needs to be done - Uniqueness - Enduring project - What other communities are doing - Honey Bee Village versus Steam Pump Ranch - SPR more interesting now - Recommendation from HPC to Council There is a workshop in May, 2009, that will focus on the annual Arizona Centennial. It would be beneficial is an HPC member attended. The HPC should send a recommendation on to the Council specifying what the project should be. Vice Chair Zwiener recommended SPR be the focus of HPC's legacy project application and volunteered to prepare an outline of the project for the next HPC meeting. c. National Register Nomination The consultant for SPR has submitted the National Register application to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) and the review and comment period will be six months. A copy will be sent to HPC members. d. SOP governing actions to be taken at SPR Once the SPR MP was adopted there was no process in place for running the Ranch. The archaeologists on HPC should be overseeing each project. The Commission should have an involved role in regards to historical sites and be able to make recommendations to the Council. HPC needs to draft an SOP regarding this. There are concerns about contamination from rodents at the sight. The Town Manager felt it was important to clean up the sight without disturbing anything that shouldn't be disturbed. Cleaning up and securing the sight against further intrusion from the rodents is a priority as this is a health and safety concern. 3 November 10, 2008 Draft Historic Preservation Commission Minutes There needs to be a balance of safety concerns and still preserve history. HPC might make a recommendation on how to do the clean up and preserve the historical nature of the sight. The Commission may want to authorize two members of the Commission to serve as stewards/wardens for site. Council Member Latas thought that might be a good possibility, but no particular person should be written into the operating procedures. It is important to have the same expertise continuing, but if not, to be able to hire a consultant. HPC should draft a procedure broad enough to come up with different solutions as needed, but strict enough to protect all historic sites, and recommend to Council for approval. Commissioner Spoerl suggested that if the draft were developed through a study session involving the entire Commission it could count as training. Chair Baughman asked Mr. Nelson to schedule a study session to include Council Member Latas, HPC and himself. e. Pumphouse The ADOT Transportation Grant was not successful at State level. Pima Association of Governments staff said there were concerns over SHPO's position on treatment. Also funding was cut by 25%. Other options will be looked at this coming year. Regarding security, the bicycle patrol will not work from the Ranch. The Police Department helped locate lighting that would help when they patrol. There are no concerns at this time with workers contracted at the Ranch. No items of historic value have been taken that he is aware of. There is concern about the rate of deterioration of the pumphouse. Without the ADOT grant there needs to be a plan based on Jim Garrison's recommendations of how to preserve the pumphouse. Mr. Nelson can report on what has been recommended by the experts at the next meeting, but he will not be prepared to report on costs and funding. Aside from restoration, to make it last longest as a ruin, is to build a permanent canopy over the top to keep the elements from hitting the sides. An alternate solution would be a temporary shelter, which we would need to know the cost to construct. VI. Discussion and possible action regarding protocol for confidential information. 4 November 10, 2008 Draft Historic Preservation Commission Minutes The Arizona public records law is an exemption for public records that relate to the location of archaeological findings, discoveries, or sights that may be eligible for the Arizona Register of Historic Places. It is left within the discretion of public officer, which would be the Town Manager, whether or not information should be redacted or public records requests be refused based on the fact that it contains information described in the statute. It also allows for consultation with SHPO whether information should be withheld or not. Ms. Mack spoke with Carol Griffith, Deputy Director Archaeologist at SHPO, Linda Mayro of Pima County, and the preservation officer for Scottsdale, and asked if they were aware of any jurisdiction in Arizona with a policy above what State Statutes provide. Their responses were they follow State law. SHPO commented that homes placed on the National Register cannot be kept confidential. It is still trespassing if people go on private property, but they can't keep people from viewing from the outside and can't keep the address private. Chair Baughman recommended HPC do nothing further regarding this issue. VII. Discussion of Honey Bee Village. The Honey Bee Village Master Plan will be distributed to HPC. HBV discussion will be delayed until next month. VIII. Discussion and possible action regarding HPC Work Plan. a. CLG Application A voice message was received from Bob Frankenberger about concerns on two items Mr. Spaeth was able to address. 1. When the application was submitted we had two Commissioners who are no longer on the Commissioner which needed to be updated. 2. They also wanted a contingency written in on how to use an outside source. b. Cultural Resource Inventory Plan Commissioner Nagy received information from other communities on how they handle inventories. We need to address what we want to do and whether to hire a consultant. Some areas of work could be done by our Commissioners. State Historical library is open to public for research. We need to know how much money is available and how to spend it. We have homework to do first. There are other things in the Town that would be simple to inventory and take very little funds, i.e. older neighborhoods. Cultural inventory means inventorying all potential sites. Mr. Nelson said the Town Council has budgeted $50,000 for consulting on this item. If HPC produced a scope of work, then an RFP would be put together with our Procurement Department. A work study session on this matter is scheduled for February. 5 November 10, 2008 Draft Historic Preservation Commission Minutes Chair Baughman asked Commissioners Spoerl, Zwiener, and Nagy to email Diane Chapman their thoughts to be forwarded to the Commissioners. This will be put first on our next agenda to address. c. Budget - No report. d. Community Outreach Commissioner Pullara said she had done some internet research to find other areas outreach plans. She has a good format, but needs guidance on where to go from here. Chair Baughman asked Commissioner Pullara to send the information to Diane Chapman to be forwarded to HPC. This should be put second on the next meeting agenda. Commissioner Pullara will be out of town for several meetings and will participate via phone. e. Process Plan for Historic Designation - no report. f. Training Commissioner Foley reported board members are required to do 16 hours of training per term. Citizen Planning Institute is available every year. Special training at meetings includes Skylark Consulting and Mr. Garrison's presentation. Other Commissions or groups also offer training. There is also the May 29th Centennial Workshop. Chair Baughman would like to see an ongoing training calendar. Once the new member is on board the Legal Department could do training on Prop. 207 and the open meeting law. g. Santa Cruz Heritage Alliance Commissioner Pullara attended the Santa Cruz Heritage Alliance meeting last Friday. They have been working on a new Southwest Food Alliance, which is revitalizing multi- cultural farming and ranching, which the SPR gardens might fit into. The National Heritage Area is up for vote with the Senate and is Bill # 2213 on November 17. They encouraged members to contact their Senator prior to November 17 to let them know how they feel. Chair Baughman asked Commissioner Pullara to put together a brief memo with information needed to write to our Senators. IX. Discussion and possible action regarding National Alliance of Preservation Commissions. Mr. Nelson said Marty McCune has taken care of changing contact information for HPC. 6 November 10, 2008 Draft Historic Preservation Commission Minutes X. Announcements. - On November 19 Town Council will consider a Heritage Grant Agreement and Conservation Easement for funding of the Heritage Grant of$111,600 to go towards more than matching funds from County bonds, and a $28,000 contribution from the general fund to go towards the restoration process of the 1870's ranch house. Mr. Nelson showed the sign to go along with that. - Last Thursday, Chair Baughman, Mr. Nelson, Pamela Pelletier, and Andrew from Poster Frost received the APA AZ award for Best Historic Landmark, Steam Pump Ranch Master Plan. Xl. Items for future agendas. No additional items. XII. Adjourn. MOTION: Vice Chair Zwiener MOVED to adjourn the Historic Preservation Commission meeting. Commission Spoerl seconded the motion. Motion carried, 6:0. The meeting adjourned at 7:10 p.m. Prepared by: ,t dA.A.L__6 C1,2, 1 41 iane Chapman 1'± Senior Office Specialis 7 HPC Inventory Historical things that occur in Oro Valley Comments by Lois Nagy The Town of Ovo Valley has given the HPC $50,000 to be used for the Historic Preservation Inventory. In order to best utilize these funds the HPC needs to discuss what is to be inventoried first and in what depth and detail. Some historical things are interesting but are of less importance. Some library research might be done by Commission Members, thus freeing a Consultant to do tasks that we can not do. Research facilities we might use are the library of the AZ Historical Society and library of the AZ State Museum. This museum has the largest collection of Hohokam pottery in the world. Also the library of the U.of A. Architectural Dept., might be useful. (All of these are located on or around the U. of A. Campus). As the inventory proceeds,we will probably find things that we didn't know existed and other things that were just over-looked. Historical Things in Oro Valley to Inventory: Things of Major Historical Importance: Steam Pump Ranch & land Honey Bee Archaeological Village Hohokam petroglyphs/rock art occur at: Honey Bee Canyon Catalina State Park-Romero Ruin In& around Stone Canyon Golf Course Things of Minor Historical Importance: Titan Missile Site—Oracle Rd.—now a church Oro Valley Country Club & Golf Course- built 1958 Oro Valley Country Club Estates— 1959 First residential sub-division Kelley Ranch House—designed by Josias Joesler in the 1930's. Countess of Suffolk's home—built 1934 The Apaches roamed freely on OV land in the 1800's and up until the early 1900's, this needs to be researched. There were several pioneer ranching families in OV in the 1920's & 1930's, this needs to be researched. Surveys -- Notes Survey -- a process of identifying and gathering data on a community's historic resources. Includes: -- field survey-the physical search for and recording of historic resources on the ground, -- planning and background research before field survey begins An inventory is one of the basic products of a survey. An inventory is an organized compilation of information on those properties that are evaluated as significant. Evaluation is the process of determining whether identified properties meet defined criteria of historical, architectural, archeological, or cultural significance. In other words, evaluation involves winnowing the survey data to produce an inventory. Why conduct an historic resource survey? To identify important historic resources in Oro Valley. The information obtained by a survey can provide unique insights into a community's past, and can form the basis for making sound judgments in community planning. Survey data can be used to create a preservation plan in which significant historic resources are recommended for preservation. It can lead to an increased understanding and public awareness of a community's historic landmarks and a greater commitment to preserving them. To make effective use of historic resources,to respect their value and extend their lives, it is necessary to integrate historic preservation into community planning. This is the immediate reason for undertaking a local historic resources survey: to gather the information needed to plan for the wise use of a community's resources. A historic resources survey can define the historic character of a community or a particular area and can provide the basis for making sound judgments in community planning. Survey data can be used to construct a preservation plan that helps the community identify the historic, cultural, aesthetic, and visual relationships that unify and define its component areas, and to establish policies,procedures, and strategies for maintaining and enhancing them. It can lead to an increased understanding and awareness of the human environment by officials and citizens within the community and an increased commitment to preserving it. Kinds of Surveys Survey can be conducted at a variety of scales,producing different kinds of survey data applicable to different needs. Reconnaissance survey--a"once over lightly" inspection of an area,most useful for characterizing its resources in general and for developing a basis for deciding how to organize and orient more detailed survey efforts. In conjunction with a general review of pertinent literature on the community's past, a reconnaissance may involve such activities as: A "windshield survey" of the community-literally driving around the community and noting the general distribution of buildings, structures, and neighborhoods representing different architectural styles, periods, and modes of construction. a "walkover" archeological inspection, perhaps coupled with small-scale test excavations, to get a general idea of the archeological potential of portions of the community. a study of aerial photographs,historical and recent maps and city plans, soil surveys, and other sources of information that help gain a general understanding of the community's layout and environment at different times in its history. Intensive survey -- a close and careful look at the area being surveyed. It is designed to identify precisely and completely all historic resources in the area. It generally involves detailed background research, and a thorough inspection and documentation of all historic properties in the field. It should produce all the information needed to evaluate historic properties and prepare an inventory. Reconnaissance and intensive survey are often conducted in sequence, with reconnaissance being used in planning intensive survey. They are also sometimes combined, with intensive survey directed at locations where background research indicates a likely high concentration of historic resources and reconnaissance directed at areas where fewer resources can be expected, They can also be combined with reference to different resource types: for example, in a given area it may be appropriate to conduct an intensive survey of buildings and structures but only a reconnaissance with reference to archeological sites, while in another area archeological sites may require intensive survey while buildings need only a "once over lightly" examination. Historic Contexts. Together with the community's planning and development priorities, and its available personnel and financial resources,historic contexts are the most influential factors in defining the structure of a survey effort. A historic context is a broad pattern of historical development in a community or its region that may be represented by historic resources. The importance of taking historic contexts into account cannot be overemphasized. Failure to do so can lead to the application of survey methods that are not cost-effective, that fail to identify significant resources, or that contain uncontrolled biases. P. Spoerl Cultural Resources Survey for Town of Oro Valley Ideas for Proposed Scope of Work DRAFT Pat Spoerl Historic Preservation Commission December 8, 2008 The scope of work is to inventory historic properties in the Town of Oro Valley. This information will be used to better plan for the preservation and promotion of the Town's cultural resources and heritage. Benefits of Survey include: • Enables forward looking, proactive preservation • Helps identify areas where preservation needs to take place • Describes character-defining features in community • Helps inform Commission deliberations This project will provide an inventory of the Town's cultural resources (prehistoric and historic). These cultural resources will be briefly described in terms of historic contexts developed in the state of Arizona or in terms of historic contexts (particularly "recent past" that may be developed for the Town. A two phase project is proposed. Phase 1: Records Search Phase 2: "Windshield" Survey and historic property documentation. Phase 1: Records Search This phase will provide an initial overview of cultural resources within current Town boundaries (and any being considered for annexation?) including: • Records Search—AZSITE • Review of Pima County and TOV records for construction dates of built structures. • Identify priorities for Phase 2 and present to HPC and public. Consultant will perform a records review of all existing materials relevant to historic properties within the current Town boundaries. This review will include review of all sites listed in the AZSITE data base and provide the Town with a copy of the listing and map. Review Pima County records for information on construction dates of historic structures. Resources kept by local repositories, such as a local historical society, courthouse, library or Town of Oro Valley property records may also be useful. Consultant will make a list of all structures built before 1970. The HPC will review and determine which of these will be further recorded on Arizona inventory forms in Phase 2. Most of those recorded will have construction dates prior to 1960. Phase 2: "Windshield Survey and Documentation. • Historic property inventory within original Town boundaries delineated in 1974 (eg specific neighborhoods to include Catalina Shadows, Oro Valley Country Club). • Documentation of priority historic structures identified in Phase 1. The project will minimally document the physical characteristics of each structure and will assign a preservation priority to each property to better assess its relative architectural and/or historic significance in the context of the Town's physical development. Additional Considerations 1. An important component of the project is informing the public of the project. Note: Do we want to include possibility of volunteers assisting in the project?? 2. Consultant will provide a PowerPoint presentation to the Historic Preservation Commission and to the Town Council. The public will be encouraged to attend these presentations and provide comments. 3. Consultant must meet the professional qualifications for historian or architectural historian as specified by the Secretary of the Interior in accordance with 36CFR66. 4. Consultant will use standards set forth by AZ SHPO. The consultant will note whether the property is potentially eligible for individual listing in the National Register (and for designation as a Landmark or part of a Historic District). Survey Products. ❑ Cultural Resources Inventory ❑ Photographs of historic sites documented ❑ Project Area Maps ❑ Survey report including brief historic contexts ❑ Computer Data Historic Context The survey report should include a narrative that places the origins and development of Oro Valley in its historic context. It should be organized in a chronological fashion but include social, political, ethnic and economic factors that influenced the physical development of the city. The overall role of the town's setting along the Canada del Oro and adjacent to Tucson should also be mentioned in this brief history. Some Historic Contexts: --Prehistoric Water Utilization and Technology --Homesteading in Arizona --Tucson— Growth of the Tucson Metropolitan Area, 1947-73 DRAFT Page 1 of 2 Chapman, Diane From: Chapman, Diane Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 10:17 AM To: Baughman, Bob; Foley, Patrick; Nagy, Lois; Pullara,Valerie; Spoerl, Patricia; Zwiener, Daniel Cc: Mack, Alexandra; Nelson, Scott Subject: Changes to HPC Ordinance Good Morning, Chair Baughman asked me to forward you the following e-mail from Lexa Mack, Civil Attorney: Bob- Here are the proposed changes. They come with a couple of caveats, though.... First, Council has not seen these yet as far as I know so they are subject to change. Second, as I said, the plan is to have Council initiate the code amendments in January, at which time they may direct staff to make other changes that are not reflected. I guess that's really just one caveat since it boils down to the same thing. By way of background, the policy changes suggested are that all terms go to 2 years to begin August 1 of each year following an election. The new policy would take effect in 2009 with each Council member making a one year appointment to each board and commission. After the 2010 election, new appointments would be made for the full two year term. Let me know if you have questions. B. Term of Office. 1. Membership appointment to the Commission shall be for a period of throo (3) two (2) years. Tormc shall be staggered so that no morc than three (3) members' terms shall oxpiro in any givon year. All terms shall bogin on July 1st and shall and on Juno 30th or until a sucoccor is appointod and qualified. 2. In the event of a resignation, removal or death of a member, the Council shall fill the vacancy for the unexpired term. 3. The Council may remove any member of the Commission by a majority vote of the majority of the Council, or as otherwise provided by ordinance or Town Code. Le 14ctok' Civil Attorney Town of Oro Valley 11000 N. La Canada Dr. Oro Valley, AZ 85737 (520) 229-4758 Diane Chapman Senior Office Specialist Planning and Zoning Department Town of Oro Valley 12/04/2008