HomeMy WebLinkAboutPackets - Historic Preservation Commission (130) AGENDA
ORO VALLEY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
REGULAR SESSION
December 14, 2009
ORO VALLEY HOPI ROOM
11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE
CALL TO ORDER AT OR AFTER 5:00 P.M. ,_)
ROLL CALL 015
CALL TO THE AUDIENCE 1,61 1,V,43‘3)
1. Review and/or approval of the November 16, 2009, HPC minutes. f5PrO
2. Discussion and possible action regarding Cultural Resources Inventory.
A. Phase I Inventory draft document.
B. Phase II survey recommendations.
3. Update on Environmentally Sensitive Lands Ordinance. LLAp,JJJ
,6A(164-111A
A4. Discussion and possible action regarding Historic Preservation Work Program.
5. Discussion and possible action regarding Steam Pump Ranch.
A. Tree Lighting Ceremony.
B. Update on exploratory removals in Pusch house and Carlos's residence.
C. Ground disturbance.
D. Formation of Budget Project Team.
6. Commission vacancy.
7. Discussion and possible action regarding Staff Report.
ANNOUNCEMENTS o0fir
ADJOURNMENT 01A6L i\ /r"--10,�` a a
Posted: 12 10 09 �xN���.`- 6t4tl�'
3:30 p.m.
cp �(�r
When possible, a packet of agenda materials as listed above is available for public inspection at
least 24 hours prior to the Commission meeting in the office of the Town Clerk between the hours
of 8:00 a.m.—5:00p.m.
The Town of Oro Valley complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA). If any person
with a disability needs any type of accommodation, please notify the Town Clerk's Office at 229-
4700.
INSTRUCTIONS TO SPEAKERS
Members of the public have the right to speak during any posted public hearing. However,
those items not listed as a public hearing are for consideration and action by
the Commission during the course of their business meeting. Members of the public may
be allowed to speak on these topics at the discretion of the Chair.
If you wish to address the Commission on any item(s)on this agenda, please complete a speaker
card located on the Agenda table at the back of the room and give it to the Recording Secretary.
Please indicate on the speaker card which item number and topic you wish to speak on, or
if you wish to speak during "Call to Audience", please specify what you wish to discuss
when completing the blue speaker card.
Please step forward to the podium when the Chair announces the item(s) on the agenda which
you are interested in addressing.
1. Please state your name and whether or not you are a Town resident.
2. Speak only on the issue currently being discussed by Commission. Please organize your
speech, you will only be allowed to address the Commission once
regarding the topic being discussed.
3. Please limit your comments to 3 minutes.
4. During "Call to Audience" you may address the Commission on any issue you wish.
5. Any member of the public speaking must speak in a courteous and respectful manner to those
present.
Thank you for your cooperation.
—Notice of Possible Quorum of the Oro Valley Town Council: In accordance with Arizona Open
Meeting Law ARS§38-431 et seq, a majority of the Town Council may attend the above
referenced meeting as a member of the audience only"."
1
MINUTES
ORO VALLEY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
SPECIAL SESSION
November 16, 2009
ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE
CALL TO ORDER AT OR AFTER 5:00 P.M.
Chair Zwiener called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Daniel Zwiener, Chair
Lois Nagy, Vice-Chair
Bob Baughman, Commissioner
Ed Hannon, Commissioner
Sam McClung, Commissioner
Valerie Pullara, Commissioner
Pat Spoerl, Commissioner
CALL TO THE AUDIENCE
Opened and closed without comment.
1. Review and/or approval of the October 12, 2009, HPC minutes.
MOTION: A motion was made by Commissioner Baughman and seconded by
Commissioner McClung to approve as amended the October 12, 2009, HPC
minutes. "
L,
MOTION carried, 7-0.
Commissioner Baughmen stated he wanted the following statement noted for the
record: Proper organizational procedures are when you have more than one
sub-heading it should be listed as ABC or 123. When there is only one item it
should be listed as part of the heading itself and not as A.
2. Discussion and possible action regarding Environmentally Sensitive Lands
(ESL) Ordinance.
A. Staff Report, project update and relation of Criteria of Significance for the
ESL ordinance.
Bayer Vella, OV Conservation and Sustainability Manager, provided the
following:
- Progress update
- Critical steps
- Types of resources
- Specific language for direction when development comes in
3. Discussion and possible action regarding Cultural Resources Inventory.
A. Phase I Inventory draft document.
Scott O'Mack with William Self Associates (WSA), a non resident, reviewed the
following:
- Sections and chapters of the draft book
- Historical sites compared to prehistoric sites
- Subscribing to AZSITE
Commissioner Baughman stated he was impressed with the preliminary report
and its historic context but found missing items.
Vice-Chair Nagy stated she was amazed with the up-to-date references in the
report.
Commissioner McClung stated how thorough the report was but voiced concern
about the implications and role of the Town and Historical Preservation
Commission (HPC) in coming up with a sound plan for preservation.
Commissioner Spoerl stated she would like to review the draft in more detail and
have further discussion with HPC.
Chair Zwiener stated the commission needs to review the report in detail, the
summary of recommendations and have further discussion and action at the next
HPC meeting.
B. Phase II survey recommendations.
John Ravesloot, William Self Associates, Inc. (WSA), an OV resident, reviewed
the following:
- Recommendation chapter for the second phase
- 5 or 10 year plan of priorities
- Costs and additional funding
- Inventory forms on historic properties
Commissioner Spoerl stated that she understood Phase II to be primarily a
preservation plan, but looking at the recommendations in the report they seemed
to be more general and comprehensive recommendations separate from Phase
II. She stated we need to make recommendations as a commission on what
detailed components of Phase II should be completed.
Mr. Popelka agreed that the preservation plan needs to be discussed in terms of
importance and then how to fund it.
4. Discussion and possible action regarding Historic Preservation Work
Program.
Mr. Popelka stated the intent of the HPC Work Program is to tie it in with
the Planning & Zoning (P&Z) Work Program in regards to budget and
prioritizing. These work items will be a part of a department work program and
not called out specifically for the HPC.
Commissioner Pullara stated the sub-committee looked at other city work plans.
Several goals and objectives were discussed and narrowed down.
Commissioner Pullara mentioned that the timelines for completion were left
open.
Chair Zwiener stated it would be preferable to look at the plan in greater
detail and come up with alternative wording to express the language that
Commissioner Baughman indicated and bring it to the next meeting.
;, Commissioner Baughman stated the objectives are going to be strongly impacted
\IP by what WSJbrings to us at the subsequent meeting. It would be smart to
develop this as WSL)develops their product and weave them together.
Chair Zweiner noted that HPC would be well served to keep this as an open
working document and for the sub-committee to continue working on the plan.
Mr. Popelka stated that Steam Pump Ranch (SPR) is in the P&Z Work
Program for continuing development and implementation of SPR. Items like that
should be incorporated in the P&Z program.
MOTION: A motion was made by Commissioner Baughman and seconded by
Vice-Chair Nagy authorize the chair to prepare such language with Mr.
Popelka for inclusion in his report if it is required before such time as the
commission can meet and make judgments.
Commissioner Spoerl stated as far as the work plan and tying it in with the P&Z
plan there will be specific needs such as the review of artifacts where there is no
funding identified for it. Mr. Popelka stated he wants to include any work that
may impact the budget for the P&Z Work Program.
Commissioner Baughman stated the need to identify subjects for detailed funding
information.
Mr Popelka stated he plans to take it to the P&Z Commission in December and
refine the HPC Work Program before going to Town Council in January.
Nkk. (VX opt OP OW-kW N
MOTION: A motion was made by Commissioner Baughman and seconded by
Vice-Chair Nagy move that the Chair be authorized to express the conditions on
general subject matter we can look forward to attempting in the next 12 - 24
months for purposes of developing the work plan and compounded of the budget.
MOTION carried, 7-0.
Commissioner McClung stated that when he observes a work plan he looks at
something that is measurable such as timelines and targets.
Mr. Popelka stated that Commissioner Hannon proposed some timelines but
Mr. Popelka failed to copy them for the meeting. Mr. Popelka also stated that the
work plan is a two year program and is continually updated.
5. Discussion and possible action regarding Steam Pump Ranch.
A. Site Access Protocol.
Mr. Popelka stated that Scott Nelson, OV Special Projects Coordinator, was out
sick and asked the sub-committee to describe what had been done.
Chair Zwiener gave an update on the following:
- Commission's discussion on the access protocol and site visit protocol
- Visitation protocol approved at September meeting
- Commission's concerns regarding access to site
- Language for an access protocol
Commissioner Baughman suggested the Chair meet with Council Liaison and
the Interim Town Manager in adopting these protocols.
Chair Zweiner stated there was a meeting with the Interim Town Manager,
Council Liaison Lattis, Commissioner Spoerl, Paul Popelka, the Town Attorney
and himself. He stated it was indicated at the meeting that action should be to
approve the protocol for recommendation to Town Council.
Commissioner McClung stated when he looks at the access protocol he sees a
lot of the same language and has trouble understanding them side by side.
Chair Zwiener stated that the site visitation protocol pertains to guided visitation
as to where the access protocol pertains to activities with more longevity.
Commissioner McClung asked where that is explained.
Commissioner Spoerl stated there needs to be some wording to clarify tour
duration to a greater extent.
MOTION: A motion was made by Commissioner Spoerl to accept this protocol
with text changes made by the sub-committee that further clarify the distinction
between the two.
Commissioner Baughman stated he would vote against it for not seeing the
language and said it could be referred to the sub-committee for further work.
Chair Zwiener stated that the language in the access protocol clearly states that
access to this site that could potentially impact the historic integrity has to come
to the HPC.
Commissioner Spoerl stated this protocol has been strengthened by including
reference to the Preservation Easement. tvvtai Low w t-viek
Commissioner Hannon asked if Chair Zwiener felt the need to include
the language regarding the differentiation between the protocol and the site tour
protocol. Chair Zwiener said he believed so and to specify which protocol it
pertains to.
MOTION: A motion was made by Commissioner Spoerl and seconded by Vice-
Chair Nagy to move that HPC accept the Steam Pump Ranch Site Access
protocol with the provision that the subcommittee will clarify the wording we have
discussed at this point to distinguish this document from the tour protocol.
MOTION carried, 4-3 with Commissioner Baughman, Commissioner Hannon,
and Commissioner McClung opposed.
Chair Zwiener stated the next action was to recommend both protocols be sent to
Town Council. Commissioner Baughman requested that it be postponed until the
next HPC meeting.
B. Update on exploratory removals in Pusch house and Carlos's residence.
Mr. Popelka covered the following:
- Work done in the Pusch house
- Cost savings projection on the design and reconstruction I
- Linda Mayer's visit on site IMPt yvtd5e f\M Rda
- Discussion in regards to Carlos's residence
Chair Zweiner agreed with the amount of exploratory removal work done and
found it enlightening. Chair Zwiener stated he and Scott met with Commissioner
Spoerl and Edward Crocker, who is an expert on adobe and gave them very
valuable information on both structures.
Commissioner Baughman recommended there be a study session discussion to
review the pump house. He said he leans toward preservation over restoration.
C. Ranch Truck Update.
Mr. Popelka gave the following update:
- Truck is licensed and runs
- Approximately $3,000.00 in mechanical repair costs
- Considering Canyon Del Oro High School for the cosmetic work
6. Discussion and possible action regarding Staff Report.
Mr. Popelka stated he had nothing to add.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
There were no announcements.
ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: A motion was made by Commissioner Baughman and seconded by
Vice-Chair Nagy to adjourn the HPC meeting at 7:10 p.m.
MOTION carried, 7-0.
2A
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
SUMMARY OF COMMISSIONER COMMENTS FOR
DRAFT CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY
December 10, 2009
The comments summarized below have been submitted by HPC members.
General Comments
• Overall, the draft report reflects a lot of thought, time and research. My comments tend
to be critical, but my feelings as a whole are of appreciation of a great deal of work to put
together a dissertation-like document.
• Like the photos on the front cover, which illustrate and support the chosen title.
• Would like to see on the cover page a listed membership of the Oro Valley historic
Preservation Commission and the Oro Valley Town Council.
• In order to understand what I was reading, while reading Chapter One, I felt I needed to
skip to the last Chapter. I wanted to see within the opening some mention of the results,
without details. My thinking was prompted by mention of"preservation plan" in the 2nd
paragraph of Chapter 1. I was further hampered in my thinking when I found no mention
of preservation plan (mentioned in the 2nd paragraph of Chapter 1) in Chapter 7,
Recommendations. Although it is the Town's responsibility to create a preservation
plan, the lack of discussion related to a preservation plan after mentioning it in the
opening Chapter is troublesome.
• In Chapter 7, page 128 in the first full paragraph, referred me to Chapter 4 for
archeological sensitivity. While, reading Chapter 4, the term "cultural sensitivity" was not
prominent, but buried. If the term is important enough to be used and cited in the
opening of Chapter 7, it should be a prominent term in the opening of Chapter 4.
• There are a lot of terms used that a non-archeologist does not recognize, such as
courtyard groups, line work, and red-slipped found on page 13 in the last paragraph.
This does not need any changes but sim ply requires an agreement as to who the
audience is for the report. If the audience, or readership, is intended to have archeology
background, then we are OK. However, if the audience includes the Town Council, then
the Draft Report needs to be written in a manner that reviews language and terms so
that the audience, or readers, is informed regarding necessary terms.
• The arrangement of chapters I might suggest changing. I believe Chapters 2, 4, and 5
should be together. In reading and understanding the report, I found the History
summarized in Chapter 3 breaking up my thought patterns related to pre-history. I would
fully develop the pre-history by keeping the Chapters together. In addition, I found the
information in Chapter 4 regarding context and significance to be relevant for reading
Chapter 2, so I would recommend re-arranging Chapters 2, 4, and 5 into the order of 4,
then 2, then 5. The information regarding historic sites on pages 100- 102, and pages
62 — 63, should be separated from the pre-historic site information, and placed withi n
Chapter 3, or a short chapter after 3. Given the recommendation to rearrange the pre-
history Chapters, Chapter 3 and pages 62-63 and 100 - 102 should be together following
the three chapters devoted to pre-history.
Page 1 of 4
• Suggest using the brochure from the Open House (or a variation of it) as an abstract or
executive summary of the report. Could also be a supplem ent in the Explorer to
increase community awareness of our cultural heritage. The report is a very good
summary of prehistory and history in the Oro Valley area and should be available to a
wider audience. There are the standard venues such as the Town's website, etc. but
there may be additional possibilities to make residents aware of and able to read the
final report. (see comments in Recommendations).
• The early historic maps are a valuable resource. Will they be filed with the Town and
available for use?
• Suggest including mention of the Santa C ruz Valley National Heritage area (proposed)
since Oro Valley is included in the area and can participate with the significant cultural
resources that have been identified as part of the proposal and potential new ones to
enhance heritage tour ism.
Chapter 1 Comments
• In Chapter 1, Sleeping Snake Village is used as an example. Sleeping Snake Village is
not used in specifics in Chapter 2, although the term "Snaketown" is used. Are these
terms the same or different?
Chapter 2 Comments
• Figure 3 in Chapter 2 is a very useful illustration. However, the figure does not exactly
match the text. There are several discrepancies. For example, on page 11, bottom
paragraph, the term "Early Ceramic Period" is used. However, this term is not on Figure
3. Also in this paragraph, the Formative period is listed as A.D. 150— 1450. This is not
what Figure 3 illustrates. Figure 3 and the text should match.
Chapter 3 Comments
• Chapter 3— Some of the Figures are very helpful, some are downright confusing.
Figures 4, 12, and 13 I found helpful. F igure 5's print is too small. It may just have to
stay that way with apologies, as I have no recommendation for solving the problem that
is improves the information. For Figures 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11, it would be useful to have
an overall modern map provided by the consultant that indicates the areas shown by the
each figure. The maps in these figures are an important resource for the report, but as
they stand alone w ith the text it is difficult to put the puzzle of their represented areas
together. In addition, the information in Tables 1 and 2 are important, but the page
arrangement of the Tables, Figures 6 through 11, and the accompanying text makes the
information difficult to access. Table 1 and 2 could be broken apart and used on the
page opposite the cor responding Figures, along with text, to provide a nice concise set
of information.
• On page 48, I found it troublesome that there was a recommendation for further
research into a very important question: who did P usch get the ranch from? I wonder
why the consultant is not doing that research. Given the significance of Steam Pump
Ranch, I would think this research is a key piece of the consultants work.
• Pg 59 —citation "Kriegh (2009)". He was deceased i n 2009 and does not appear in the
references.
Page 2 of 4
• Pg 59, regarding incorporation of the Town on April 15, 1974. It would be useful to note
that while the Town was incorporated on April 15th the first Mayor and Council were
appointed on April 17th, thus the Town celebrates its birthday as April 17th
Chapter 4 Comments
• Overall there was a good connection between the his toric and neighborhood infor mation,
and recommendations. The pre-history, or archeological information was extensive, but
the analysis in Chapter 4 was general, and not specific. I found this troublesome. A
recommended solution is to try to find example archeological sites within the study area
that are possible examples for the information contained within Chapter 4. This step
might clarify both the information collected and presented in Chapter 5, and the context
and significance recommendations found in Chapter 4.
• Pgs 65-67. Would be useful to reference the Arizona state historic contexts that apply to
the ones identified for Oro Valley (eg. Homesteading in Arizona, Prehistoric Water
Utilization and Technology).
Chapter 5 Comments
• Pgs 79-80. Does the Town have copies of the archaeological reports referenced for the
3 large archaeological surveys that have been conducted in the Oro Valley area? If not,
what would be the cost of obtaining/duplicating them? Seems it would be good to start a
cultural resources reference area for the Town rather than all cultural resources
materials being placed solely in specific project files or having to obtain them from ASM.
Chapter 6 Comments
• Chapter 6 was the best presented chapter. It had a nice overall town plan, with
highlighted areas for residences and neighborhoods the chapter intended to highlight.
There was a nice summary of the residences and neighbor hoods, and brief analy sis as
to their historic potential. Pictures from the window surveys illustrated the text. Tables 9
and 10 summarized the information contained within the text.
Chapter 7 Comments
• The recommendations in Chapter 7 and the summary on page 131 are concise and to
the point, making the information highly accessible.
• The Recommendations are good and should be carried out although they far exceed the
funding available for Phase 2.
• Priority items:
1. Subscribe to AZSite if HPC is informed of data base updates.
2. Prepare an assessment of the likelihood of previously recorded sites that may still be
intact (eg. map overlays, subdivision information). Identify priority areas and sites to be
investigated based upon the lim ited information in AZSite for future ground inspections
to verify.
3. Coordinate a visit by SH PO staff for a preliminary review of the identified potentially
significant neighborhoods.
4. Obtain additional information from National Archives on GLO claims (suggested on
pg 48). Selected ones could be determined by HPC and consultant.
5. Not included in the Recommendations is consultant coordination with ESLO team.
Phase 2 could include time for that effort to provide technical information for
development of zoning regulations.
Page 3 of 4
6, Consider the final report as the preservation plan for Oro Valley with
recommendations in last chapter, or modifications of them, approved by the Historic
Preservation Commission.
7. Phase 2 could provide funding for duplicating the final report so that as many
residents as possible have an opportunity to learn from it. Examples include copies for
the OV Library, copies for the HOAs in neighborhoods that a re potentially significant,
copies for area schools, etc. This report/plan shouldn't just be put on a shelf.
Page 4 of 4
O OO5- H = oa.3 -H v05O � pa3E
0o CD O O -0 CD a o_ - Sv aC Sv a--)1 —
rn cn � c� N C 3 c' o 03 o_ o a) E — O X 5 '< 0 gn
rn 3CD "0 (DDI Dvv < D D7o —
n (' _ O 0� � m- 0 Sv CD — O • p CD °
7pv mT JcnQ cn m- o Sv p co = Cn (D Cn a z
�• Q. Q o v rn < = o. p n 27 o cD -, `� rn Cn
60 ga) 3 (D .-o rn . = C —0 ,-300 p En Sv -a -I
co � — Cn _ _ CD � � � �
�. o_ a) D
" �. CD CD � CD v �' � � P � � � cn Cp � COD � � -I
v
CD .--.- Q- O CD CD -p s= D- cn �' ,--.- O O -o CD m
CD v Ft co -, CD A- -, Cn -• (1:3 , D- - E
Cn
r+ O CS — 57 CD O CD Sv
oCDorn � cn � ,� � � sv �k< < � cD � � � ° rn
. (D o_ CD n = cn• E' -' ° �_ C7 O CD . D) Z
-+, co -s ,w r* rn 5D _ __O CD 0 5 p• c sv ,_„F D v -I
,-+ O o O O -• O -� C7 CD �. D CD O cn �' O r+ o_ 0
D v -0 (i) �: v = CD 0 Cn Q CD n- 5 cn 0 CD r 0 O Q
wi1
• ° SCD � o3 N O ,� CD - -1 Cn CD co Fe-, r-
w D Sv O O v Cl) c D a Cn U). cnn 7 5 C;D D, '� r�
o_ O _ '� D (D Cn C—D -I o• CD cn• N cn n• m
Cn a) -+-''• o_ Cn• C7 0_ COCn c Z r+ 7 D O Co a) '<
Z � s= �
73 Z
Sv (7O cn - 5'o_ 7.,,, 0. 3 --.--0 a) - ° IC/ C1) (7) * a) %, CDC*-13 z 7
- = D ° nrn = O -3• 0- Qv 7O
CD -0 � O _En rte' = "'Q3 cn 0 =3 * D- n7' 0 0 (nD - -' y
CD o_ _• Cn o �, r--_ C 0
(1) 7C 0 -• -,. _
c'-O Cn Sv w o_ CD CD Cn• - O n < S) N r+ CD 5 Sv
V' CD a) co 5-‘• -. CSD O cn o O , O O O -. Sv , C�
fl) CD C)• a) Sl) , = 1D Cn• CD -o 7. O Sv
CD cn Q0C n) o v — (� E71 v ED U, C C..3 CI)
D- C_D CD 5 0 Q c 01 En Cn O -, cn 5' Sv m AI
Cn CD -I a' * g O = , .1-.. 0 E ca D n
CD O< Q- V' CD r- 71.N Ni CD , CT y
(D co v' CD - — ED = Cn• C Q —ari, 0 V' <0 si, _, E CO O O CCD" Svco m Q
-� ocDsz. vo 0 ,.�o 3 gr ((in) 8 01 Fi. .....: , - o3 � D o 2C Q � Z
ry g =-,.: 0
Q
r+<< O cE (") c CD : -
U) 3co CD n Q C CD
o � 3 2 � cDQ 3 o3• (, -I
•� � 0 � E �° -�, CO 0
o �
-• o_ c xi CT(o D- * 0W D CD O C/3 • C( D n O•(o 2 vSv Li
=E Si) =
(n CD C/3 o_- '_,'
0 0 -C3
0
D CD CD - o_ O Co O -O0 30 - CD n Sv r+ O CD Sv
o_ Q COD CSD D ;74. pm-- N o_ ° C O (D O NO
Sv w r•-• o_ DD D < Q 5' (n — C CS
CO o D- = -. C �_ CD Sy �• o_ -• C CD < O
CD coCD ir u) O Q o 3 SD o c� ° 0 CD 7• CD Sv N
C7 •Co CD - = CD ,-+ = r_+• o Co Cn Cp O
' SCD ED _7' n n D O 0 0 , (D 0 U) '<
a) 5. CD o o_ a) -+, -0 0. O 0 Sv CD CP ED 0
D -0 E; -CD
• W O L72. v o r+ O m- Q
O -, p -' Q -' vOOOo ° Zi
_ u' Sv
o ccn - CD . -3*--5- cpci n5' v = m- <• 3 � ' 5n
Da
n _ 2 �' o
CD EU 3 0 , r n 0
O
v —
zBO U3 - = 5v -na-
CD = CA: 0 o_ Co CD •
al . CD
cn 7 = n c_ — vv C . o D
n -� . , - DD m- D , c o_CD -; a) OCCD < -t
(D CD 0 ..- 5- -• D
-,
0 o Svn Cn - co CI U)
�_ C
ul cn
= O -a-0 U) O U)5 O
El) CO
CD cd = CD - a) C B = CD
CS 0 0 c
O SD o M
O O Sv -' --1 , n 77 CD '_-� -s
-2 r-+; o .-+ CD `.<
n CD U9
- -01 v0o 00 li 00
su n o_ c o 0`0 0
, o � co v n 0 rn r
vco v > v 0 D —
o. a o
a):4-; D
rn
0 0 771
Q
5• u)
(0
171X
N — WN — N) — -A W N -, 0
-D
m0 0 ma73 0- -o a; c 0 0 7i � — cn0
x a) 0 x -, — (D -� ._-� o o (D -
-0 B CD (D < rnrn = 0 Q < -0 -0 rn
CoD < < �a)- o n (Dcn -0 � c cD
o_ D D 7Jo 0 0 0 ,� ,� -I
-in ED
< (D o- fl) CD 0' - Q (D N —
-
O Q (D" 0 D 0 0 c ,..� 3 3 rn = rn
- CD o (Q ( , O - (D rn U) o C/)
cQ c� c� rn o o 5' o n.
Q o Q_ o = 0o 0 00 D
o_ -�-, -� 73 rn
(D cr. CU —1 O 0 •--F (D D D Q CD (D N
w o CC Q < 00 (D o o ea ED(D v
(0 0 < o O 3 ,_...D < Sv v r+ CD O
CD =', O OQ C N : : O 0 O N
O o N I cn Q Q (D 0 O
v ocn Q cO �- �-_ c) 0 3 3 wQ N
cc) —. o (D v v D 0 O is
(D (Do QC0 u,. � -0 Q 00 � C
N 0 ,,_ _ 0 Q.. < < `- a- v v n3 .� O
0 � � v co CD - _ 5' o' 03
ts
N 0 r "c C�•
5 5-' (D g V
U) Q O ,_., G) • o ro 0 (D (D u) N
v_ CQ w (n ,, A ° I Cn o o `< O r
5 - (D 0 -o 3 : CD •o < O
r
5.-o a _,
CD 0 Z
(o 0 O D -` -h - : U) =
O c 5 (D EU VOi = C CT u)cr-• 3
D n (o I 0 U) v CD 0
-o -• D- o' 3 (D 3 CD Cn
O (D' O 0 u) 0_ -0 -0 Q a)
C • Cli 73 Q -�,
CD
LI) 0 CD
(D (D (n (D ,-� u)3 < C (Di
Policy No. 10
TOWN COUNCIL POLICY Date Adoption: 04/02/03
Date of Revision
REAFFIRMED: 04/20/05
TITLE: TOWN COUNCIL, ADVISORY BOARDS AND COMMISSION
MEMBERS SITE TOURS
Page 1 of 2
I. Purpose and Need for this Policy
The purpose of this policy is to establish a protocol for Site Tours to prevent
violations of the Open Meetings Law.
II. Policy
Town Council, Advisory Boards and Commission Members will observe the
following when on Site Tours:
A Site Tour is a"tour" only and not a public meeting. If more than two (2)
Town Council, Advisory Board or Commission Members are present on a Site
Tour,p roper protocol is that Members may only listen to information given
and only ask questions to clarify what exists on the proposed plan.
Anydiscussion, deliberation and possible action regarding changes to the plan
must be reserved for a regularly scheduled meeting.
III. Other Information
Attached is a"Sample" regarding Public Notice to be used for the Town
Council, Advisory Boards and Commission Members Site Tours.
APPROVED BY A MAJORITY OF THE TOWN COUNCIL:
Mayor Paul H. Loomis
Date: 4,4
Office of the Town Attorney/ca 031903
Town Council Policy No.10
Page 2 of 2
"SAMPLE"
NOTICE OF PUBLIC TOUR
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL
Notice is hereby given to the members of the Town of Oro Valley Town Council and to
the general public, that the Town of Oro Valley Town Council will hold a tour open to
the public on March 18, 2003, at 9:00 a.m. located at the Kachina Conference room,
11000 N. La Canada Drive, Oro Valley, Arizona 85737.
A quorum of the full Town of Oro Valley Town Council may be present. This is a tour
only and not a meeting. There may be information provided and/or questions and
answers during the tour. Discussion and possible action will take place at a regularly
scheduled meeting.
The itinerary for the tour is as follows:
Sample Itinerary in Table Format
9:00 a.m. Tour participants arrive at the Kachina
Conference Room, 11000 N. La Canada
Drive, Oro Valley, Arizona for
transportation to the Naranja Town Site
_ property
9:15 a.m. Tour Naranja Town Site
9:45 a.m. Return to 11000 N. La Canada Drive, Oro
Valley, Arizona
For further information, call Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk, at (520) 229-4700.
For reasonable accommodations, call Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk, at (520) 229-4700.
Date of Publication
•
RESOLUTION NO. (R) 03- 26
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO
VALLEY, ARIZONA, ADOPTING A POLICY WITH REGARDS TO TOWN
COUNCIL, ADVISORY BOARDS AND COMMISSION MEMBERS SITE
TOURS
WHEREAS, the TOWN OF ORO VALLEY is a political subdivision of the State of
Arizona, and pursuant to Article 13, Section 7 of the Arizona Constitution, is vested with
all rights, privileges, benefits, and is entitled to the immunities and exemptions granted
municipalities and political subdivisions under the Constitution and laws of the State of
Arizona and the United States; and
WHEREAS, attendance by the Town Council, Advisory Boards and Commission
Members at Site Tours will be of direct benefit to the Town and makes actions rendered
to the Town more effective; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that it is in the best interest of the Town to clarify
what the Town Council, Advisory Boards and Commission Members protocol is at a Site
Tour.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of
Oro Valley, Arizona, that the Town Council, Advisory Boards and Commission Members
Site Tours Policy is hereby adopted.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and any other administrative officials of
the Town of Oro Valley are hereby authorized to take such steps as are necessary to
execute and implement the Policy.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley,
Arizona this 2ND day of APRIL , 20 03
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
Paul H. Loomis, Mayor
ATTEST:
C‘,1-
.
Kat Cuvelier, Town Clerk
APPROVED a S TO FORM:
A/ 4///11
1
AP - Ca
To' n Att t ey
FAResolutions\Sitc Tours final.doc Office of the Town Anorncy/ca 031903
PROPOSED LANGUAGE FOR TOWN COUNCIL POLICY
Under no circumstances shall digging or other ground disturbance take place on that
part of the Steam Pump Ranch property listed on the national Register of Historic
Places, except in the presence of a qualified archaeologist. The reason for such
digging or other disturbance shall be reported to the Chair of the Oro Valley Historic
Preservation Commission who shall provide an archaeologist where appropriate. Only
in the case of genuine emergency may the Oro Valley Town Manager waive the
provisions of this policy.
Page 1 of 1
Molinar, Suzanne
From: Popelka, Paul
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 12:47 PM
To: Ruiz, Deanna; Molinar, Suzanne
Subject: FW: Historic Preservation Commission
FYI
Paul R Popelka, RLA/AICP
Acting Planning&Zoning Director
Town of Oro Valley
11000 N La Canada
Oro Valley,AZ 85653
P 520.229.4896
C 520.940.3598
F 520.742.1022
From: Cuvelier, Kathryn
Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 2:26 PM
To: Watson,Jerene
Cc: Lemos, Stacey; Popelka, Paul; Rosen,Tobin; Gransie,Tracey
Subject: RE: Historic Preservation Commission
Thanks for forwarding Pat's resignation from the HPC.
Kathi
Kathryn/E, CHC
Oro Valley Town Clerk
11000 N. La Canada Drive
Oro Valley, AZ 85737
1-520-229-4740
KCuvel ier@oroval leyaz.gov
From: Watson,Jerene
Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 11:46 AM
To: Cuvelier, Kathryn
Cc: Lemos, Stacey
Subject: FW: Historic Preservation Commission
From: patsprl@aol.com [patsprl@aol.com]
Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 7:21 AM
To: arizonahawkeye@comcast.net; Loomis, Paul; Watson,Jerene; Latas, Salette
Subject: Historic Preservation Commission
Dan, this is my notice that I am resigning from the Historic Preservation Commission effective today, December 11, 2009. I
am leaving because of my upcoming appointment to the Oro Valley Town Council to serve the remainder of Paula Abbott's
term until June 2010.
Thanks for being an excellent HPC Chairman.
Pat
05/14/2010