HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - Planning and Zoning Commission - 8/5/2008 APPROVED MINUTES
ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
REGULAR SESSION
August 5, 2008
ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE
REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
PRESENT: Doug McKee, Chair
Teree Bergman, Vice Chair
Bill Adler, Commissioner
Clark Reddin, Commission
ABSENT: Ray Paolino, Commissioner
Joe Hornat, Commissioner
Scott Merry, Commissioner
Also Present: K.C. Carter, Council Member
Sarah More, Planning and Zoning Director
Joe Andrews, Town Attorney
3. Call to the Audience opened and closed with no speakers.
4. Minutes
MOTION: Commissioner Reddin MOVED to approve the July 1, 2008, Planning
and Zoning Commission minutes as presented. Vice Chair Bergman seconded
the motion. Motion carried, 4:0.
MOTION: Commissioner Adler MOVED to approve the July 10, 2008, Planning
and Zoning Commission minutes as presented. Commissioner Reddin seconded
the motion. Motion carried, 4:0.
MOTION: Commissioner Adler MOVED to approve the July 15, 2008, Planning
and Zoning Commission minutes, with a correction on page 8, under James
Loughney's comments, changing the word "observed" to "preserved". Vice Chair
Bergman seconded the motion. Motion carried with the correction, 4:0.
5. Update on the Development Review Process Changes.
Ms. More stated that staff is looking for ways to improve the development review
process, allowing for more compatibility and flexibility. This will be brought back to the
Commission as a discussion item in October, and then to Town Council. If code
J
August 5,2008 Approved Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes
changes are required, it would be brought back to the Commission. Bayer Vella,
Principal Planner, recently held a meeting with developers and HOA's and received
support for this process.
Discussion followed regarding:
- Holding neighborhood meetings earlier.
- Developers more willing to do changes.
- Use of word "flexibility" encourages too much negotiation at Commission meetings.
- Better end product that saves time.
6. Discussion of Amendment Criteria, Approval Conditions, Special Area
Policies and communication of the Commission's decision rationale to the
Council relative to General Plan Amendments. This discussion includes the
process for developing approval conditions and/or special area policies.
Vice Chair Bergman stated that this agenda item came from a conversation between
Commissioner Adler and herself on how the public hearings are progressing on the
General Plan amendments.
Discussion followed regarding:
- Clarify amendment criteria to have a more common basis for decision making.
- Examples to illustrate criteria.
- Respect of other commissioner's opinions.
- Better definition of the term"use".
- Criteria are not relative, but absolute.
- Clarity so future commissioners will understand.
- Limitations on uses and appropriate degree.
- Equity - Land use law principal says like properties have to be treated alike. Zoning
law allows placing conditions on uses. Overlays are allowed. There is no similiar law
for GP amendments yet. Do like zoned properties need to carry the same zoning?
- Has character of area changed enough to warrant a zoning change?
- Limiting uses is a disservice to the community over the long run.
- Communicating recommendations to Council:
1. Memo to Council including date of public hearing, number of people attending,
issues raised, and why they arrived at the decision.
2. Include discussion in minutes of Commissioner's reasoning for vote, after motion is
made, but before the vote to help public understand why vote went the way it did.
3. Chair could write a report to Council, from the Commission as a whole.
- GP gives list of potential uses. The zoning process is still needed to consider health,
safety and welfare.
- During GP hearings, communicate expectations.
- How special conditions are created.
- Consider all GP visions, goals and policies before adoption of amendment.
- Have conditions in community changed enough to warrant an amendment?
- Meeting market demand.
- Look at land use percentages.
2
August 5,2008 Approved Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes
7. Discussion of Ex Parte Communication.
Attorney Andrews distributed a paper explaining Ex Parte. The translation of"on one
side only" could be stated to mean "not without the other party being present." One-on-
one discussions with applicants and citizens are discouraged outside of meetings, but if
unavoidable, the conversation/information should be disclosed to other commissions at
their meetings. Encourage them to talk to staff, who will distribute their concerns to the
Commission.
- Business should be done in open meetings.
- Purpose of public hearings is so all can hear all the information. It is a fair process and
everything is in the open.
- Encourage public to come to the hearings and share their concerns and opinions.
Neighborhood meeting attendance is optional as all information is conveyed to the
Commission.
- There are no Ex Parte requirements in State Statutes.
- Staff is not included in Ex Parte requirements because they need to be able to talk to
the applicant to get the process done.
8. Future Agenda Items
- Upcoming GP Amendment public hearings:
Sept. 4, Arroyo Grande at Casas Church, 6:00 p.m.
Sept. 5, Rancho Vistoso Neighorhood 5 at 6:00 p.m., and Stone Canyon at 7:30 p.m.,
both held at Casas Church.
Sept. 11, Oracle/Hardy at Church of the Nazarene at 6:00 p.m.
-A special notice should be sent to all participants of last night's neighborhood
meeting for Stone Canyon 9, giving the room and directions. The notice should also be
put in the Vista.
-According to Planning and Zoning rules, election of Chair and Vice Chair are to take
place at the first regular meeting in September.
9. Planning Update
- Three code amendments on public art, subdivision assurances, and landscape
requirements, should go to the Planning and Zoning Commission in October.
- After that would be GP process, NH meetings, and submittal requirements.
-In 2005 during major commercial code changes, the consultant removed some
requirements. A code amendment may have to be done to fix those changes.
- There was a delay in getting out the RFP for ESLO, but it should be advertised within
the next couple of weeks.
- Discussions on pre-annexation process will be after the GP Amendments go to
Council.
- We have received input on Arroyo Grande from a study done by AZ Game and Fish.
They presented a wildlife workshop on how to take science and apply it to the real
world. Alternative maps will be available for consideration. There will be 4 sections of
3
August 5,2008 Approved Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes
development with the rest being open space. Staff will be prepared to present a
completely revised proposal at the next public hearing.
10. Adjourn Regular Session
MOTION: Commissioner Reddin MOVED to adjourn the Planning and Zoning
Commission regular meeting. Vice Chair Bergman seconded the motion. Motion
carried 4:0. The meeting adjourned at 7:55 p.m.
Pre.a red by:
iet
411G
Diane Chapman ti
Senior Office Specialist
4