HomeMy WebLinkAboutHistorical Records - Miscellaneous (40) May, 31 , 1974
Editor
Arizona Tdrritorial
Tucson, Arizona.
•
Dear Sir:
I read with intereot ir. Brandon's latest diatribe.
Isnt't it strange that when the County said that it
would cost '4260,000 to contract services to the Town
of OroValley, Mr. Brandon lepaitily agreed; when the
County reduced this to $160,000 Mr. Brandon again agreed.
Then on March 21st Mr. Brndon stateed that the udget
would have to he at least 130,000. Now, a few weeks
later he has the budget reduced to 93,000. A reduction
of $167,000 in a matter of weeks would indicate that
with a little more work # could still be educed sub-
stantially.
Br. Brundon critizes the budget figures submitted by
minority council members. He has completely ignored
these figures by changing them to suit his purpose,
which of course is to frighten the residents into be-
lieving these erroneous figures. The only contribution to
the budget thst Mr. Brandon has secured is an attorney's
fees. This can be done with one phone call.
The pro-incorporators have many perple willing to work
to make the Town succeed, but they will not work under
the council majority as they have seen through the false
statements, Inflamatory remarks, and general disregard
of the facts by the majprity council members.
It is also interesting to note that Mr. Holford, who
told the Board of Supervisors and by inference Judge
Mahoney, that he was "neutral". On all controversial
issues he has voted with Br. Brandon and Mrs. Montgomery.
and has in all ways indicated that rather than being
neutral he is definetly anti-incorporation.
If the Town is run into debt it will be entirely due
to the majority council, as they have voted to spend all
?e-yReiERea4tiliagilgr ;Rg
tsTown of Oro Valley allow thwr
to remain in power yoi will indeed be likely to be assessed
to make up a deficit.