Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutHistorical Records - Incorporation (32) J 4 re,,',„4„/„AT rJ�� .....„,m...,_ ry,« �Y 00, ,,,,,,,, ,, . , tit et, d (7.:1?:-/ ' 7....._,... / ___. /1 1 . w.,,,,„. ,,I, ,,,,,,, ,, li . ,1 11 . . IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA ,. • h • T N ANDFOR THE COUNTY v PINAL ' n i I .• i 1 ' • J A .CE S D. KRE G'H and STEVE V ) s.. fi ENGLE , .' s representatives of ) 1 hose certain petition signers 4 for the proposed r.�o�,��1 of Oro ii Valley, ) 7 ! ) • Plaintiffs, 1�o ,� 94351 SI! N • 1 ,v.s o \ No TICE OF REARING 1 'moomAs S o. JAY,• DENNIS WEAVER 1and DAN S MURPHY,Y, ea:h as s. 1 ' i members of. the Board of 12 Supervisors, Pima County,1 __ Z_ ona; ,..�t.. COUNTY, ARIZONA, ) 11 body o 7 .�... , and d �.HE O_.�R..� • -' li OF SUPERVISORS U P ERViSORS , ri n`znr C o i V y ) •CI ' ,s{�µ f. fc•:: „A 1Ariona �F•7 ... ' e n J t ETcn , 1 ] 6 n /7 TO : o : TH 0 S S u j A.+1DENNIS WEAVER and JA ES MURPHY, eacLas • o members or. the Board-of Supervisors, Pima County, Arizona; ; ,, 0 8 • PIM., COUNTY, :ARIZONA a body ipo. i is , and THE, BOA OF f n ▪ Ll 1SUPERVISORS, Pima CQu..:y, Arizona, and ROBERTHILLOCK, Ao ny ✓ of Defendants . o O 901: � 21 Notice is hereby given ive that the undersigned nde► sineCatroi. ✓ =or 22 I the. Pla nt ..ffs will present to the Coup�: and orally argue the 23 I attached Motion In the courtroom 'of the ' .nal County •Suerior .. i .112 � 4 y"► the /j � � r.. ,r1.t.. � hour .n...^ • I'� '1 I, Court o-i 19th `da of Jul 1971, as the hour of 10.00 a wr1 �51:4.4ti+Ai..0.f'..rrJ Y,.._..1........'ig.g.r..+#7,..3.r.z...vr • ....vi:w.........m..,...� . 25 .j 1 or as -soon thereafter as counsel •may be heard.1. Dated this 1st day of July, 1971. ,. 1 • 28 DOWDA L :A RRI S HULL & TERRY ) F �/I' 'ri�� '',,.i..++'` s ! !l�'7�4.',..-,., ,,,,,,‘,,,';*9,4 i 1::/ 9,-, ///,';I, , . , / •' . ...f.,.i�:.1` ri�.d' ..o ;1 'Richar d C, Harr:Ls .,„,:/,/ v . •i •CALEND,RED • 50 Noy:th Churc Avenue For Attorney r_ ....�.2-.. c .. Tucson, Arizona . 85701.' • • 1,1' At�.orn� s foe plaintiffs _. - - 1 Orient ri ;.o,;,,.. ._. ___ -.---.r..--..._.-. J "i Date Rec d, rJ Calendared r) ,,. Dati. es . ,- 1 . • 7 , li . • r • 1'1 .1 i S p 1t1 • .� l CoEh�y a. t� o f oreg i n mailed f chis 1st ,,�y of July, i971 ( '^j o i h Robert M Hillock j Pima\.L, County Administration .ir.ter\��Jr°i. U _��.or:ey for Defendants s i •• • • 6 il , • .• 71 l .. , , . • , , , .. . . . . .E • 1 • I • • , •. . . . . . . •.• i• : . ,,I. 1 • . • . • 9 i . • i ` • ° i , ♦ • • S c • • z• . • i. • ••E ilt .L.:.',. li . ', ' . . ' , . L:., h�a i • .q r j ...▪. 7 e • rri rr: �. - G7 G . ,. .�.. �, a t z —,r U 18 ., I"Y n1 ��1 ; , °,o �` ( i • I t 21 If E { s . t i . : . , , . • ' 1 • Y ! ! 2 1 I 25. l' i { • °t 26 i • • .• . • . I ..• t • 27 ,11. " i • 23 ii . • . i • 2.J 1f C 30 . . € �. �.. • • • . il . . . i •11 " 11,. , . . . .. . . . . .7.l. - -H-' . . • . . . . , . . . . . . . . • . . . .. . . . . ., * 1 ' . • . , , . . . . • . . . . . . . .. ' .•• • ' li ' . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . o • • ' . , . . . li . • . . • . . . . . . . . . . , . . ' . . . II • . .. • . . .. . , . . . .. . . . . . . • .1-1 " • IN'THE • SUPERTOR COURT OF TEE STATE OF ARIZONA • IN AND FOR THE. COUNTY. OF PINAL '•'' . . , . . . 9. . . . . • . . . . • • . . . , •. ..-, 1 . , . , JAMES D, KREIGH and STEVE \ ) . . -:- ., 'ENGLE, as representatives of ) . I 5 those certain petition signers ' ) . . ' 1 for the proposed Town of Oro ) . . . 0 I Valley, . . . [ -...... ,,,..... . ' * ) • . • , . . .] • Plaintiffs, 'NO. 24351 , . . .) . N . S . ) , • 1 vs . . ) • , . )9 . , ) MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGIENT . . 1* THOMAS S. JAY, DENNIS WEAVER ) (ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED) 10 and JAS MURPHY, each as \ ) members of the Board of ) 11 41 , ,. ) . . , . . -- , bupervisors, Pima County, , Arizona; PTMA COUNTY, LA,RT7ONA. ) A, .......4 A... , . 1 9 d • -- 11 a •body politic, and THE BOARD ' ) .. . . ) 07 SUPERVISORS , Pima County , N , ..... 0 - '. .., > I Arizona, ) Li • CL': 1 z7 • 1 e • , ) Li :-. Li . • . Defendants . , . ) „ 70 75 • ..-3 :•:,' : r, ) ...1•,... a) ..„... i:... .. - `I7 r• i 1 . . . ". '.;.-. g "3 2 L3 Oi Z" 4 I 7 11 . COlvE NOW plantiz.fs, :JAMES D. KREIGH and STEVE ENGLE , as . ti,,,, < ,_, p.. :,..; ..„_ _ _ _ , , . 00 18 •Hrepresentativesof -chosecertailapetition signers for the proposed . .-.1 07,-... • . < m C.\.. N 19 1 Town own of, Oro Valley, pursuant to Rule 56 (a) , Arizona Rules of o [ . c 20 1 . . • . . 11 Civil Procedure, and move the COLO grant Summary Judgment in 97 , . . . . 1 favQrof plaintiffs in the above entitled cause on the grounds , ..,, • . • 221, and for the reasons that 'thera-is no genuine issue of material • 231" fact. in this controversy and it appears from the pleading i and 24 '1. 25depositions and affidavits of record herein that plaintiffs are .96 entitled to judgment as a matter of law in that : . 27 : . I. Plaintiffs have fully complied with the requirements for incorporation of a city or town as setforth in A.R.S . 9-101 .. ' 29 ) 1 1, (a) . and (d) and defendants have arbitrarily denied incorporation.- . ...., , i 1 Plaintiffs position in this regard is more fully set forth • '31 [.39 in the attached Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for 1 . . 1 , . . • . fi . • . , , • . k . . . , f 0 II , , , . ... .. „. . . .•..,___,...... ..,... ... . . ...... . . . . . . . . , . , .. . • • . , .,. , . q ' ..* re-- .'il • . . . : , - -7...... /...... 7/ , . ...-- II . . . • . „ . I ., i'i - !i, . • , , 1 ii il . • . ' . • • i . „ . 1 . ! . . • 1 \1 • 1 f, Summary Judgment . 2 1 f f DOWV Y D a,:.tel p a\ Ai .,R ,l•�L 1./�• �L U�.i..l i�•..� & T'RRv.:•. • / .r ///7' ./ /./ * l'a I, di''' •'1. -.dr? r•')/44,....///1'1,..„.,',r.)1f. f . "'"c",r .17,7:',,,L4,1 4, . 1 �„ io Lia.`d C. H�.�..L i s 250 North Church Avenue '• • , • 6 ; lucson ,Arizona 85701 7 II Attorneys for Plaintiffs r8 it . _ . 9iCo oy of th oregoing n ailed . this F ` .d ay of tf_lN,7 '• , • • ' ' 1 li 10 i.� /.:. to. • • -"" 1 Rober t M. Hillock r �.. 0 �uc s A r •.r'y { 1, i1 Attorney f o : D fendav is i 1 c"..1 z z ,...,-- IF . .ted LI u 1 iV 7• 1 2 z z -- ,/ ' • • . . i o r i t C 20 1 • •{ 1 . i 21 ' • `2 1 , • .23 II ' 1...: • • i �� • . 1 • R �� ' 26 l • . 29: li . ' . • . . •• ,, . . • . . , :20 V. . . • . - . il . , • . . -.-....,,i,. i., . . ' 9 • L . . • ii „...., , 7...., / - , , .:•....„.•: 0 , . •,! . , . 11 ,. . . .„. . . . . . . .. . . i • II . . . 1 11 . 1 il IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE 02 ARIZONA , • L , , . il I 9 TN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PINAL : . • - ,I , . • .j1 • .'"N I : . . i . ..D 1 • \ . jAMES D. KREIGH and STEVE ) . . . . . , 4- 11 . ENGTE as representatives of ........, , ) • , . . ,_. ) •. . il those certain petition signers . . . 5 h •, . • . 11 zpr the proposed Town of Oro ) 6Valley, . ) . . • 11 ) . . . i . • N , . 7 1, . • Plaint-Tffc ) NC94351 .......- ” . ,:, • . . • . 1 • li . . ) . . ..., ,” ,..,:. 1, MEMORANDUm OF LAW IN .SUPPORT 1. ‘... i? vs . . • • ) 1! . N r . . ) OF MOTION FOR SUY-2/1ARY -• - I- THOMAS S. JAY, DENNIS. WEAVER . ) . . JUDGMENT . . • • . • - 1 • • , 11 1-0 d. JA \MES. MURPHY, each as. ) • • I p -----•., n • 7 \ - 1 • 0 members of the Board of . ) \ i , . 11 • ...... 0 ,,, 11. 11 Supervisors ? , Inu a ouncy„ .. A...-,..-.-.-,0,a-.,, PIMA COUNTY. ARTZONA.4, ) . 12 '11 a •body oolc , and THE BOARD ) . . • . • ,. . . , . , , • • 11. 01., SUPERVISORS) Pima Countyj\ i.., • • . .1. 4. . , Arizona, ) - • . • • t ›.-- fz: , , • \ •,' . i 1 . ) . . , . N . . . Defendants , ' ) . 1 n 11 e3 z ...c; 1,..7 il . • - ) , 7 :"?.. 111 1..%, • .1....., t 1 ......... n il • . 1 7- ..-- - ib l' 0C) 1 . • 1 • 1 Plaintiffs ,?s relpresentatives, brought this action -Lor - 0 , 0 ' • i ., .... , .,,--., Uricr• ' l• .1... 0m 0 .L0 1 of Mandamus to force. the defendants who are the members of 1 . ........3 0 i.... ., 1 ..,. i . il the Board of 'Supervisors of Pima. County, Arizona, co declare o p• 20 , 1 . • II, incorporated the Town o Oro Valley. : 1 - i . 21. J , . , • r=7.--'- '..- facts are uhdisouted , insofar as they are - ate_f_al to ' 1 • 1 “ - .. , 22- .1, o ' the• quest-ions of law be-Fore the Court , 731 1 t . . A -,' Q ..„.L.,,,..) . 9-101 sets forth the orocedure by which Inhb aitants 2,-Id - z,,,-- may. pet-LI-H. -n 4--,co,-.' oration in Arizona. . 2iaitiffs contend op . .. . ,.........V.. for .1...... -p 1 • • .' i ' . • 7 2611 'that they have complied with every elemett. under • that .statute • . II. • 1• • , ...., 1. . . , . i • ''. 2/. 1 1 and that the defendants ,acted arbitrarily when 4n face of the . p . H 1 . • 281 i 1 Lindisputed facts they did not. declare the Town of Oro Valley , 11 . . I ' • • '...)9 !I, 10 incorporated . The statute reads as • follows : .:•,',,,) il. • i . , • 11 - " .'1 - "i''... , When two thirds of the real property t,,xo2 • -'-s y,...,... ; • • ...)1 1 . ... I -1 residing in a community containing a population of five / I ,, 0 • hundred or more inhabitants petition the board of . 1 ..7,.., i.; . ........ i, HIi , . . • • ,, . i • h i . 0 • . . . . . I, . • • . . o • • • 0 • . . . . b i • , . . . . ii ' ••• ' •.. -- • .. • . . .. . . . . F; , • : , •• . . • 1 ••• ••.• .•..•_•.•••„.„.,•.......•.,„•.•.. .. . , . • . . .. ., . , . . , . . .. , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . • . . . . . .• . . . . , . . . . . . . • . 11 • . e • li 1 „• 11 ' . 1 It ; ;! Supervisors , setting forth the .metes and bounds of 1 il , I • , cl the community, and the name under which the petitioners - 2 1 ti y desire to be incorlporated, and prayin2. for the 3 il incorporation of the community into a city or town, . and the board is satisfied that two thirds of the ,,, ri .., 1, real property taxpayers residing in the community . 1 111 . have signed the petition, it shall, by an order ,•) , entered of record, declare the community incorporated , •• 6 11 as a. c ity or town. . . ; il , t 7 1 . D , I.For . the purposes ,o1.- tnis section, the word community shall mean : a locality in which a body of 1 • SI oebple reside in more or less proximity having cor.amon , , ,. interests in such services as public health, public g I . , 1 protection fire protection, and water which bind . . , toaether the of the area, and where tbe ,Deople 0 - people ~ ...0 1i• - . , 1 . ,, are acquainted and mina...L. .L.,.., business , social, , 1 ., a 11 : educational ,and recreational activities . .._ . 7 1 . . i • I 1 . . 1 -7 4) ,t J.:- li Courts cannot interfere with .subordinate boards when they r 1 q 1 . . • . . , "."') C, oraperly exercise their delegated legislative authority in , • , . . i - . 1 ,-... h r, ..f A i 4 • .I • L., 1-•.- ri ; creai-i-,-, cities and towns ., -_,...,.., ,....._ State. ex -,--c--,7 Pick,-,---71, v. Dow-lev, , 1 • ej 7 ..... m ,, .;..3 11 ...! ;:-.: .7N • 1 r).,-- 109 Ariz „ _Do0, 430 P2d 122 (1967) , Thus, when subol-dinate . • i 0 . 0 . . • •. 1 • .7 ›. ., ..3Ce boards improperiy exercise their delegated.. legislatve• autlIority ,.... 0 c, ,•• (7.: /7 . i . %, .. „.,..,.,..... ,... „.... . • . . . . = 4F2. c 0 the Cou-i-L.-Q may ini.- rfe.-,..e. .. . . .. . . . , . . . i • . .,.... 0 (1. 18 . . . . ....1 < zo - . . . -2, ,c) .• ii . . . , • < . ....) . r; ,-.. , ...., . . 19 li . mil, 0 . ,....... B.... ,......r.. r ,”" " ..,,,...L. L,ounLyoa-uo- vlsors possesses only such .power - . I ....:-.1 . . , 1 n ‘,.'0as is expressly conferred by statute or Ls necessarily impl4ed i - . . . 1 • • i . • 71 i , -- tneref=orn. Pickrell v P.,,owney,, . • . • . i . . 1 • • 92 . . . . 1 . The discretionvested in ---.1.--1e .County Board of Supervisoi.s • : ' 9 .i . 11 by statutory language "the board is satisfied” A.R.S .9-' 01 (a) t) 7zt1 1 . . . i ' ..0 is only legal ciscration Co determiia6 whether tne conditions i 23 11 , _in ii • of the statute governing municipal corporations have been met. . 1 . • !, ........ .. _ i ---7 t-)-lck-r,-.71 v Downey Any abuse of discretion by the county Doa-rd 21 11 .- - *--- . "' ' . . . 26 ,r- 11 1 ; super of visors is sublect to YevieW on direct attack. Pck--..all .., i 1 . 1 . 0 . ! 2.) I v DowneI. , 1 1' . • . i 0 h r 1 r",r, , ,+-. 5-- -'- , 1,..,.c.. s,...a,..uLe, when considered phrase by phrase , shows that 1 . , ,...1.... i, , 0 pLaintiffs have established\beyond any doubt their rightito ,.•4, .\ • . 1 incorporaton. .. -2- ,, 1' ;1. , . i 11 t . , ' . ,..„.. , . , . • • ,. . , . . , . r G' . 0 ` . 'i . • • . * li ' • . : 1! , . • . . • . .. . • . Ii . , . . . i • The. Pima County�� Boath of SLl4.pe v soy s (as . Sta^aed' in t ":.e • rpositions f r1 S v --�4.. ` S .tA.-.,, :.�x' a�z4 JAMES 3 , • RiS Rr3.:.� • .JR ) was ca�._sfied that t.o�e Mowing rcqui e.�.en:s of ' OF 1 . ilt i .._e s t a l►•�.:l•..e w e e me L: b ci. [ o ha o the community of Oro Valley contained a .6 , population of five Hundred o... more inhabitants . 7 [{{ . N5 ; i i r� , . •Tii.i�a V the petition •n properly seforth the metesV! � • • 9 and bounds of the community.r i 1 4 s0 �l ^ � tethe name under which the petitioners G.ost ed it �.. to be incorporated was properly set forth() • 1; /iThat the r?e: _ _o� o4. o�C21y contained ed a Drayer { _ ` Cr ..r ..�^ .dam.� ^� •.�r1i,r1 �^.w.q(/�) yrr,_'�}gw � �)•,•yy(•�� ^yr.�uh, /1/�'r'^'l�'1�(`i"'r�� � " � city .�+ 7 1 zo.:., the rice.o��✓o CaV or'•A oz 4Lac community i tco a o.i.. ? townF t .� O '�7 r s h .y. i 1 1 ` 1.� T'1" .+ thirds ��y r .!r"• ter , oro-party 1 _;. ,- < 1!� 11 5 . i i i a L. w o t i.i i+'c s o f, �..i L e real a. taxpayers rr c Ci r �" 0 t e . e • c� .�aing , � commLn�c� �� . signee .L.t.Lof s f< r •Pcc • t 7t) : 1 A.R.S. 9-101. 1 states that no territory may be incorporated 1{ - Off (t • ' < • ' 0 ; •%f is sloca�ecWitisic : `1) S a1tcegec of : city o Lornta i o k 1 r fa r, 1 a population�a:c on oz ,•-•-.),0 ,.)O o . .ol., o�. within (2) Three ml e s of a 1 i ii or,cicy or towHaving a tDo _aion of less than 5, 000 as S•�.� v.71by 1. g} �.... Federal _e mos t recent census � 1 ;y LU t. I f{ The of (aga r •lE c woa`r Su;e�VSor� - as indicated in the r} c � � JAMES �: N: • 23 1 � =posiL- o_s of THOMAS v. J , �� ! � n�� ��, ana J. •� ,. , t' ,. �,, was Sc' r-.�.s .`.F d L. .c `• CsC �. CCL.iL.e rnenL'S o A.R.S. J"' 3. were i 27 !i met by eL t do e.Ls . • 1 3 - ilThe basic legalrequirement n.. thethaeareaaea proposed o1.. 29' N 1 V 1 Inco Jo2at,.io_i be a community has a.Lco been i met„ =;c d ' . • c oLLimuL j.i.t y ir..1•.J defined a y 1 K,,,. i rl..,7 - in - '1-4 -1,• n -7 ^ - .- '-,^i y o'.� ...,, rt, people reside i more o proximity,.` having common interests i f•I : : 1m1 r F ii j 1 t . i f f rr I . • 1: . .11 tl .• . in such services as p :public be-- 1-1-- pug pro'-ec iio , fire� , is t 9 il "protection, and' water , wi bind together thrpeople o.._ thee , ii +1 j area'���.. 1'� "r^� the "�,"�/�I^^r � are'�j n q 1'�-' and t �"t=�^I�"� 1 /� ^i-�'� 'f area and where p o o are acquai ��ed and mingle in business , F •` f social. educational, . i d r e c n e a i V n a~ a c LV�� V ce e s . A.R.S . 5 f � tF _I 9- j 0' 7 (d) . ii • 1'`1 of v1 matter � i n 7Jw ,Lny^Qwhether a community" exists ss i s` ..r .il . 81 a matter of judicial determination; hence, the f -3y the i J j I ..,i. of .. �e i+^a that •Y ° .L i 9 1 . e a r ooa d su;� rvisor s that a con aunit does exist i s subject to 4 • 1 1 -,oil judicial r";,",.� !�•c, 2c •^ "'. rc"-y . `I• J �'•. ` �.. i l�L.►\..� by �F.a`... ✓��w.ice � i .a l . ...... q Parnell v. State ex rel Wilson, 68 Ariz 401 , 206 ?2d 407 (1949) . + 12 .I _ • i i=re Arizona Supre :.e Court clarified the definition or the i i„--, ii � oterm 'community�tr which is presented in A.R.S . � (d) ,o J 0l 1. `z od Specifically, the Coin. lae.!d - 15that a bod severalof hu d.�ed , ..'1 i ti r ... G i1 1 -(3 .. K E V i f #�e o i-.f�l e living � 1^ area o a few V V square miles , a n yf'S i '^+C' ',?";'"'. on ! . is C..,.0 N - 4 ^r , ` t 7 !I t • ii = 1 i� eresLs i1 �� bl!c health, oups �ro .•ec .iin and w� e , =s IT, 1o / ,GG } CJ _. ,So «» • i-- i1 rac - a community. i� Is not necessary Fo� the services in il `, ... r'''1 �Z 1 F 9 t question to be in existence at the time of incorporation, orfor o y • 20 � tk� q n 11i t e com uni y Lo have a shopping center or business district . 1 , i jj i rI c, ..E..e it v, Downey, sura o ; 23 /1 E n addition to the s�Je if ° c yy �' of A.R.S. �0j . (a) • L l .t.+�.�L.n"_:.J..l.d�+..�i.a�.► G+4'�:il�..�1� � ..r V.r i 2.-'1 11 having been met, the following facts will further illustrate trace i Yom•' t f . ���+� �� a ~ .I-.� tL. �f V V � � N �,� � , • � 1 0 1f that Oro I�i � c is in face. a �� nit as defined s.. A.R..S. t i 4° 4 9-101 (d) : il f 1 I h L The Pima County rv..- of Supervisors has adopted 23i! ' r6 '• Neighborhood on iiiib e�.� �. known as Valley Plan. 9 J1 ; .. o 2 Substantially all of the area sought to be �^^) 1 f, i ncor Borated l i e.s within Oro Valley Neighborhood Plan. t a the area is subdivided t.nde is ti fit -L - 6 f t • .c !� 1 fi il . . . N !3 • E1 • f . piscs ,gipprovoca by Board o.L 11 Supervisors . � .� CanonDel Oro High hSchool and �u .o High Scnool 3 a:: l ocated within the area. • 11 5. There is a site -o.:.. a 9-''''''TT'''"... . s� .72 j the • ,.. a-I. a o ,, All' children within the G...ea are served by . 8. Canyon Del Oro High? School and Junior High School. 11111 7. There .s no ag�.icultu� o�. livestock grazing 101i . . . . , within the a-,,-ea. ' il . • . . 0 S „ Ther Gwent -four apartment be�ilding p ro j ec .• 12 ir. H . -.. . .- . ' . • • • • ' • - .• .• . . 1 • . Ii' in .the. area, • r. 9, Fifty ctr :.wo condominium home apartments• are now; 1 •, - LA PI . • •• •• - - • , w ti st under conruction, �. • 1. 6 .,. f • • 10 o 'There is a .�.oo_Le homc.--. court •w� c Z�: the area.. . . y ` .,L L v y-•...•r , k .. tLIw z7 • 11. Tbe-.se is a reseawL:ca and ae•ve?opme��o .Lac.k:.�.i y or 1 2 o • ,� • y • a sisto� sn • • . o ✓' F i / F 1 '�4n 1°a t, �+ a t."`/} tp1 r,o- p b'rJ t houses u sv ( :"!`v c^.�`✓�t �1 r'S j(( • } • . 2`i1., -- r e-e •...w s iJ u wiw dr d i....0 4 w�...i.�r w�.o v F.`.v w.�d .r. 1 `^" • l Z. . ... : '7)0 +u I. ' Vai1ey • Inc . (a land ev.e lop'men t company) ani. approximate • ly ti • .71 l - i • • i. i .1. , • Pmaou �yomens � .wenLyacrepa� s �e ti r. wain7ri;x a 9� 1 the area and next to the •High School. 1 25 14. The O o Valley Country Club is •loca..e i .iarea and includes : t f 7 1 w {,� l r W A swimming p o o l . ti M c � .A �wo h�ndwed � .ni� �y -fve . osu� vso: ; 29 d. A bar and _ cruor license ,, # w v -r i . •..J 11 "t... A pro sho9J, 32'11 l5 � Substantially an� .�� �� ��� o� the residents�� � in the� r. . �., • ii • • 0 .: , 4 . ) `r { i. 4 •• � 3 . • 1, tI sY it 1 l { i Ii • r t •y• e',_ baJWawater from LJpublic service co .!Jorati oL . 2ii _ L fl.r� ?r • - .+.. a .2•.i �.r E,,.- .-`�-,••��• G s served by Tucson '+/-,,.:r-`.-.^� f_'.-f ry .�.`,., V • Electric 1.1 company. A ii a • ia : ~aauD " .,rtt. o1.. ::Ly . lr.c sewer system to serve Shadow Mountain, oui aiLShadow Mountain oucc in EasU apartments Jarme ts i + Oro 6 .k _i Valley,' . 7 il •M Canyon Del Oro High. School and CanyonDel oro • li 8 ;l J ui '._-i_ or 0 School #t .+.. s 4 : e t..s are dedicated d accepted Pira r l''. a* IQ li. Coy::." . .I II . 19. The streets- are maintained by Pima ./ o i . 20. :.,got less• than 75 o a?l roads and streets are I iLiih t w T's Ye-, re areais served .7 < i it .7,,,Y. ,•� corporation for fire protection. , E , cti• c. to D 1\ r•, fi+ 1 ii -vii % ` 4 r .r J•' f - 22. Th V\ e i•i e i i.e a r.•..e a r a�' e dei l c'^4 /` Y s.�•-n ter, r•y I rr 0 '' 0 to C's �,`` .r Vii , .:23'.... s�.y.L�v�. .�i C..;..i.. % planned �i._�:i.i,i �.l�'C ? theal-ea 1 1J iYs apo r oved by the Boy:d o.•_ Supervisors .:o'er s . 1 o yy l i.1 '�,�'ti" 1 i 1 2L, ...�e .,eo?.t.e rLo ,.�-e ,r.�.a have a coir on interest s :• 21h • 11 •j/ 'i in seeing eeig d 1 a^ there hena ai a • • i �J !, . • i • ' . � Proilerly mainca cd. streets .na roads . • • - • / oads0/ 9 J. �, Street a1� highway s � � and traffic control. : . � � i o . i1r A c . Prober-w zoo �. g and leve loprnen c k ' . d. Police Drol-ect7on. . _ t . . 25 11 e w La"�-i"d -' g codes and architectural control oz , a J .1 .fa tL r. deve?o..�r'�-'�L . i v 27 ,, are common n ceec restrictions ;�� she sub- N .-... - • p ill .di el s:ons • • i i 1.1 f • ,, i . ://if. 1 .,1,4'0 11 • . . ' ' : ' '.1(' ‘1,77 •••';1., 1 .0 C; '75'.:J:32 ,,. t.., ../..c, .4.,,,,A.., , . , I 'B y 4'"';'t?....„..".„,,...."...),-",,..- .„.. , ' )1'”,,..- ._! 7 1'.:-.':7,::•' '7,..:'.',./,'''..---,?';',.' .11/n .ridyF>� „/,..'•;,..1! .1w-t-' . V•-' 1 • S 1''\.i s s"1a r a C „ H e r;rn �� �,•�' , ,� M 250 North Church .Avenue u�. - ,• • • Tucson, . Arizona . 85 701 Attorneys ' for 'la ntif f� •• , • e t—' li \ . . . ii 1 i` ! • �� 1 1 il Cody of the foregoing ng mailed , ii _ ... i c E' - J to: il C Robert ob M. 7' • • _L` R `p ,ma County Administr . .Lon ui.,_diAL ni,.. H,. ' r,; nucso,, Arizona 6 il • • s .....'.. il . . • • • . • ) •11 ; ` • I tt. 1 r~ to 1 LI . t Y' ^ ' c 41 ° ` i d Nr .• . i, " V .,r L. rii._ Q'cn 12 ! li . 0 N 1 9 il , > l 1 0 2.r 1 ii 9 +! 4 4I , ............ 0 4F 1 t • g 1111 `;,N� � ` 3 1 26 1 \ ' j } 7 I 1 1 • 1 il . J t L I so ili i 11, .z.:2 .i , • ' ; it • —7— , 4 I ; . i , i , , 1 it . , r. . li . 1 il . ) , i -7— j 1 t . . . , s ‘ — /o — 7./1 „?..„ , .- ..... • . .. ,.., . . . . . r,„..., ,., „:„; :.. . . . . . I . ., ,. -. . 1 . . . . . .. ,... . . : , , . . , ,. 7....... /......... 7/ 1 . . , , i , . , , . . • - II. . . . . , ii . , . . . . • IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 07 TSTATE O ARIZONA ILI , : �` AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PINAL raj . 1 4 4 11 JAMS.: -.D,, IRSIGH .ir,nd STEVE ) r— H, EL'G�:.L ; as representatives of \ lthose certain petition signers • ` `1 fo.r.. the proposed �Tow of Oro ,) fff f Valley, ) • 7 .1! . ) ... • 1 Plaintiffs raii4irLs `` ) •ice1i V 2435 / / r . ' • ,..-) P ii , :. ) . { Vs . .� f` ) AFFID VI i IN SUPPORT OF MOTION 0t THO �S S . JAY, .DENNTS��S 'AVER . ) 3� SUMMARY JUDGMENT a �? JA NIS MURP Y,' each as . .', ) , . , , 11 111 ;, �'�-,' s of the Board t; SLDe:v sot s , Pima Coin y} ) 12 1 Ar 1_r z c�'a� IMA' COUNTY 1�sR` ZONA, . a body politic �d THE BOARD, ) ' �-�' 01, S u PlaVI SO RS P4'—'5) O o ur�t y ) ' , „A. 11 �,..�.z or.a • • L -7 Defendants .. ) i-,,is i • ,. I ) •4.• `r J .4 c” .:lJ a z � N - +. r i�j•1 -i `, •��y ��I.V�.I��tI�� r�� u ¢ 1 �' ".r.�.L ~ '�I �y �.+. � � � �• ' • a z -� V YES D i firms s� duly ,swor 1, deposes and says : . „ co. $ • • 0 _c ars one of. the piaLr :iffy ire tie above entitled ac toM, 0• h 1.‘j � 31 " • } and that t I aac� �c dyced � ib�. ce: tam facts v�s � �ic� relate ate to said d/ • 20 h E • '' action a s follows : 4....• .i. ;,,' 1.o That in connection with that certain Petition for 4.12 0fi 2 11 he I c orporr a�. on o the Town of 'Oro Valley, . that n o t less than'. . . . . . 24d . two-thirds of the re pL ro e `t y taxpayers residing within the fI. 2:o s area proposed to be r.cor'p orated signed the 'Petition on 'wh c was 26 fl . , presented to the defendants . . , 2 f, T hat • a copy of- said Petition is attached to �� � )qq - Affidavit. , 9 0 i 3, That said Pec_ Ic fo�� incorporation � . r.; ,�--.�e '"f w �+G 5lr 1 lbs..��. 1.���.. 1 6 area proposed co be incorporated �� metes� < 5 a ,� bounds ,v LA ` � ,P I 32 ft ,i , i1 <1 f4 r • , •___... .___ . 1 . • r •1. . ' . . v- 1 . . . • . I • , . .., ' I, ' • . • . ,, .. ' • . , .1.• i ' L , That the said area proposed to be Incorpor.ated had . 1 2 1 1 a population of more than 500 inhabitants on the dates the • 1 Petitions were signed an4 on the dates they were, filed with the . . .4 • 1 Boa-,-d of Supervisors , and on the dates at which a hearing on said b Petition was held before the defendant Board of Supervisors . . 6 ' . • . 1 . 7 5 . Said Petition described the name under which ' • , Petitioner sought to be incorporated, which is "Town of Oro • 0 , ' . . . 9 . Valley".. . . 1 • 10 ! • ., , ' 6. That the area sought to be incorporated is. not, , • • 11 II ' and was not at any time, within six miles of any incorporated . I I') . - City or Town. . , • .. .,-. Is (.... L.-.. 1 7 That the area sought to be incorporated is urban 1 , • 14 ,..., _ c.,.J -.. ,.... .• -2 -•"' u L-.) 15in nature because a body of several hundred people reside within ...1•1=3.- .,;.:‘ co ---: ,.,-,•.,.. 5 :,.. .-, 1 an a.-I- of than 2.85 square miles, in more or less proximity. I is - -L-- - less - >-. - - a• Li (-) ,--"" ! --:•" .-_- LD ; `-'• 0 '-- 17 • 8, • That the area sought to be inco....cporated is generally , . \•,• 1 . . ,.... ..,_ cl . • • N ''' 18 known as the Oro Valley area. ? , , o , 0 ......) , , z 9. The people .in the said Oro Valley area have common i , 20 1 interests in such services as public health, police protection, -21 fie...,,, I 4protection, water, sewage services, drainage easements , 22 ,i, public schools , public roads, and all other activities related • , ........, , . 1 • , :r•o, u-i^b,,,,i) livin2 ,41 ..... .... - . ..,..... (:). • • . ., I ,, . •• i • ,1 ,Z.,..-D. 1,, . 10. That of the more than 600 inhabitants, not one ' d ! ,, 1 single ,, 1 ! 2011 ' inhabitant earns his livelihood from either agricultural 11, 1 271i 1 - ' or grazing enterprises which are conducted within the boundaries . 11 , L . 1 .26H 11, .. of the propoped incorporated Town of Oro Valley. I , .. 29 . 1, ' . • 11 ..„ ..., • 7 I il IL, Tat all of the inhabitants• of the. proposed Town i SO i 1 1 . . , ol., 0.1-..o Valley reside in more or less proximity and that sub- [ . . - -, . I...,..,_ . , i _ .....91 stantially all of said area has been subdivided into lots of.: .,.... 1 . . . • i I - • , . . -2- . . • I . i ... • • . . . . . I . . . . L . • . • , . ., , • . . • I. • 11 ' ., . . . , . 11 • ' \• • . .. , . , . . . . , • . , , - . , . . . . . . , . , .,..,.. . , . , , . • .. -, . . . , 4.40 .� i , Uw II I *s li il 1 11 various sizes which are primarily used for residential purposes . {. That the pattern o { such subdivisions generally has established .2, I i tne pattern for the proximity of Nouse s in the �.�ot�ose mow . I l i 1� I limi.`s . That the only vacant parcels of �. property of any i significant size consists of: � .' 1i { 1 - I (a) Properties owned by AmphitheaterSc� oolDrc�w , ( which are reportedly, held forthe r ur ose ofenlarging • • 9 1 . . existing schools and erecting future schools, aild , (I 1 C .m .L.A.cy, - na, o . ce u. ose of I1; erecting_ � ) \ I ......... !, t ! �.. r1'R3 r-1^,�'Iver i^j y�,.^I , a y�1^f.�.w.b c. aim{.i 3 i J tri, � � f L • I (c) By .land o r��erS, whose p�-o e�-c .es are now zoned D''(� 4.7 • . ed .cJBoa .d o{ S Supervisors, for either dense apart w r 0' developments, bUsiness / © r resident-7L7 L . G-�. . J J - . 7 - ,,� e, :,-) �0. 2 N s 16 1 - . That I know many of the. people who o rse in this . oo 17 Iand that these people e are g neall cc a- nt ec w.�tn each he- 7. or �-- < o . mn and mingle In business , 'social, educational and ec,reaL+on = 1 0 19 l 0 1 activities and express themselves s residing in the Oro Valley 1 i. �.eig bh oyood. Area Plan, and many are members of various homeowners r -.r Ii as oci atio�^:s o.. La s area. 2 2 I • 11j r* ' �d 3 Y(? ,.0:,,, ,:.\ )< A/A rr �' ,?. .mes D. Kreigh . • . , �� } ,s 1 _ i � • SI BSC�t B D �., o be. Y 96 ^' `� -' �� s w�J � '�. before O: e me this�.S ,'�l a o ..��.:� y n , ,l f � 27 1971 , by James D Kr-i `' } 1 t , (72 ' 1 r...moi.-ti•L.+t,1 i I Nocary Public My C - r.c,. r T i . is f� , i i ';;:gI r ,: i . , . I • . •- i . • . . 1 ! -• 0° co y of the foregoing �i a...�.e�,� .I . i' -t��is 1 . . day of July, . f 971 to: . j - ` Robert Ms Hlock 4 .l PimaCounLyAd� inisfi ^a4ion' Building l''. Tucson,, A izon j 5 It Attorney for Defendants I 7 i .. i 8 ii . . • J 10. 1 ` i CLI 1., 1 iect, z 0.— ...,,....' r , = .i. 02: �' + L a . , ` mZ.) 0Ni I ma O ` o P. I' c L) . 01 I � a O i . i 4 1 22 il t . .23 1 24 • 2 J ` 26 III r11 . F 2� l! • , ,, t . 29 I 3o . . a • j ft 1 E 11 I