HomeMy WebLinkAboutOV1701617oPOJp�1EY q�?o29 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
DEVELOPMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES DEPARTMENT
11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE, ORO VALLEY, AZ. 85737
PHONE: (520) 229-4800 FAX: (520) 742-1022
www.orovallevaz.gov/dis
��UNDED 19�A
1.2 GENERAL APPLICATION FORM nffiro Use Only
OV Case #:
Application
Type
..._.��
❑
Major General Plan Amendment
❑
Final Plat
®
Rezoning/PAD Amendment
❑
Pre -Application
❑
Planned Area Development
❑
Zoning Verification
❑
Conditional Use Permit
` VIE,
❑
Sign Criteria
❑
Zoning Code Amendment AJUN
❑
Sign - PAD Exemption
❑
Conceptual Site Plan 2 3 2017 1
❑
Master Sign Program
❑
Conceptual Public Art
❑
Communication Facility — Tier 1 and 2 Minor
❑
Conceptual Architecture BY
❑
Communication Facility — Major
El
Final Site Plan • """"°"""'•••••••
❑
Revised Development Plan
❑
Conceptual Landscape Plan
❑ Other
Subject Property Information:
Address: Parcel/Tax Code: 224-21-0020, 0030, 0040, 0050
Subdivision / Commercial Center Name:
Book / Page or Sequence Number:
Lot Num
Legal Description: S2 NW4 SEC 9-12-13
Section/Township/Range: Section 9. Township 12S Range 13E Area of Property: 76.4+/- Ac.
Existing Land Use: undeveloped Proposed Land Use: Single -Family Residential
Applicant Information:
Applicant *:
* If more than one, attach list
Name: David Williamson Firm: Shannon 77 LLC
Address: 700 E. Broadway Blvd. Suite 200 City: Tucson State: AZ Zip: 85719
Telephone: 520-404-7681 Fax:
Property Owner(s) if different from Applicant *:
Name: Firm:
Address:
Telephone:
Consultant:
Fax:
(Discipline)
Email: davidwWairfieldhomes. net
City: _
Email:
State: Zip:
Name: Paul Oland Firm: The WLB Group, Inc.
Address: 4444 E Broadway Blvd. City: Tucson State: AZ Zip: 85711
Telephone: 520-881-7480 Fax: 520-881-7490 Email g op landQwlbgroup-com
1
Proiect Description/Narrative:
This request is to rezone the property from the current R1-144 to R1-36 to enable the development of
a single-family residential cluster subdivision.
I hereby certify that I have read and examined this application and know the same to be true and correct. I am the owner
of the property or the Owner's authorized representative, and if not the owner, I have obtained the owner's permission to
perform stated work. All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this type of work will be complied with whether
specified herein or not. The approval of this application does not presume to give authority to violate or cancel the
provisions of any other federal, state or local law for which this project may be subject to.
Notice: It is the applicant/owner's responsibility to ensure all private rules and regulations (such as Covenants, Conditions
& Restrictions (CC&R's)) of the subdivision and/or commercial center are adhered to. Contact your Home Owners
Association or property management to determine applicable requirements.
It is also the applicant's responsibility to coordinate with all outside agencies to secure their acceptance or clearance.
Failure to do so may delay issuance of permits. See attached list of agencies.
- _ Paul Oland 6/22/2017
AD icant's Signature Print Name Date
Important Note: All submittals received after 4:00 p.m. will be processed the next day
Submittals will be reiected if:
• Not folded using Pima County fold & collated;
• There are missing items on the checklist unless otherwise approved by Planning Division Manager or Town Engineer.
• Re -submittals cannot be accepted without a transmittal and a written narrative summary describing the purpose of
submittal.
2
OQOVN,I.EV Aq/Z�y7
7 •
1 ►
d ►
4 1.
s�oLNOs.�
Town of Oro Valley
Community Development and Public Works
June 23, 2017
Mark Highlen
All Seasons of Oro Valley, LLC
31731 Northwestern HWY, STE 250 W
Farmington Hills, MI 48334
Sent via email: mhighlene@beztak.com
Re: Zoning Verification Letter
All Seasons of Oro Valley
1734 E. Innovation Park Road
OV1701591
Mr. Highlen,
Thank you for submitting a zoning verification for All Seasons of Oro Valle, located in Innovation Park.
Below is the requested information with general inquiries in bold followed by the researched
information.
Current Zoning Designation: Campus Park/industrial (CPI) per the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area
Development.
Conformance with Zoning District: Senior care is a permitted use by right per Ordinance (0)08-02
(see enclosed), which amended the Rancho Vistoso PAD to include, "Assisted living /skilled nursing/
continuum of care facilities shall be permitted on Parcels 3-1313, 3-CC, and within the Innovation
Corporate Center."
The current structure legal conforming (complies with, or is otherwise exempt from, applicable zoning
regulations, including parking).
Overlay Districts: The property is located in the Town of Oro Valley's Economic Expansion Zone.
Variances, Exceptions, Conditions and Code Violations: There does not appear to be any
variances, special permits, exceptions or conditions that apply to the subject property. Also, there do
not appear to be any outstanding/ open zoning code violations that apply to the subject property.
Right to Rebuild following Casualty: Chapter 29 of the Zoning Code reads: If, at any time, any
building or land in existence or maintained at the time of the adoption of this ordinance which does not
conform to the regulations for the district in which it is located shall be destroyed by fire, explosion. act
of God or act of the public enemy to the extent of 50 percent of its value as determined by three (3)
competent appraisers, then and without further action by the Town Council, the said building and the
land on which said building was located or maintained shall, from and after the date of such
destruction, be subject to all the regulations specified by this Code for the district in which such land
and building are located.
Site Plan Approval: The final site plan for this property was approved by the Town of Oro Valley on
March 10, 2015 (see enclosed).
Oro Valley, it's in our nature.
11000 N. La Canada Drive, Oro Valley, Arizona 85737
www.orovalleyaz.gov I phone: (520) 229-4800 1 fax: (520) 742-1022
Town of Oro Valley
Community Development and Public Works
Final Site Plan Expiration: Section 22.9 of the Zoning Code reads: Approval shall expire if
improvements have not been started within two (2) years of the date of approval of the final design. A
request to extend the time beyond two (2) years must be submitted in writing to the Town Council
within two (2) years of the date of approval. Before such extension is granted, the Town Council shall
review the existing financial assurances to ensure that the required improvements have been made. If
the approved final design is abandoned, the Town will return the financial assurances less any
expenses the Town has incurred.
This information was researched by the undersigned, per request and as a public service. The
undersigned certifies that the above information contained herein is believed to be accurate and is
based upon, or relates to the information supplied by the requestor. The Authority assumes no liability
for errors and omissions. All information was obtained from public records, which may be inspected
during regular business hours.
If you have any questions, please contact me at msimms@orovalleyaz.gov or 520.229.4836.
Sincerely,
Milini Simms
Planner
Msimms(a7oroval1eyaz.gov
520-229-4836
CC: File
Oro Valley, it's in our nature.
11000 N. La Canada Drive, Oro Valley, Arizona 85737
www.orovalleyaz.gov I phone: (520) 229-4800 1 fax: (520) 742-1022
OQO JP�yEY g9�O�9
AOUNDED 19lA
Town of Oro Valley
Community Development and Public Works
March 5, 2018
Paul Oland
WLB Group
4444 E. Broadway
Tucson, Arizona 85711
Re: OV1701617, Engineering Acceptance Letter for Shannon 80 Residential Subdivision
General Plan Amendment / Rezoning Site Analysis (3'd Submittal)
Permitting Engineering review has completed its review of the referenced project and has no
additional comments at this stage of the process.
If you have any questions, please call me at (520) 229-4824.
Sincerely,
Esteban Tineo, P.E.
Senior Civil Engineer
Oro Valley, it's in our nature.
11000 N. La Canada Drive, Oro Valley, Arizona 85737
www.orovalleyaz.gov I phone: (520) 229-4800 1 fax: (520) 742-1022
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
DEVELOPMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES DEPARTMENT
11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE, ORO VALLEY, AZ. 85737
PHONE: (520) 229-4800 FAX: (520) 742-1022
www.orovallevaz.gov/dis
1.2 GENERAL APPLICATION FORM
Application
Type:
❑
Major General Plan Amendment
®
Final Plat MAR 2 7 2018;
❑
Rezoning/PAD Amendment
❑
Pre -Application
❑
Planned Area Development
❑
Zoning Verification,
❑
Conditional Use Permit
❑
Sign Criteria
❑
Zoning Code Amendment
❑
Sign - PAD Exemption
❑
Conceptual Site Plan
❑
Master Sign Program
❑
Conceptual Public Art
❑
Communication Facility — Tier l and 2 Minor
❑
Conceptual Architecture
❑
Communication Facility — Major
❑
Final Site Plan
❑
Revised Development Plan
❑
Conceptual Landscape Plan
❑ Other
Subject Property Information:
Address: RV Neigh 10 Parcel T
Parcel/Tax Code: 219-22-422H
Subdivision / Commercial Center Name:
Book / Page or Sequence Number:
Lot Number(s) Lots 1-19
Legal Description: SWLY PTN SE4 SW4 E of Ado to La Canada Drive
Section/Township/Range: Section 26, T11 S, 13E
Area of Property: 5.74 Ac
Existing Land Use: Vacant
Proposed Land Use: Single Family Residential
Applicant Information:
Applicant *:
Name: Dick Maes
* If more than one, attach list
Firm: Grace Holdings, LLC & J.D.W. Investments Management, LLC
Address: 1121 Warner Rd, Suite 109 City: Tempe State: AZ Zip: 85284
Telephone: 480-831-2000 Fax: Email: Richardm(o)wholdings.com
Property Owner(s) if different from Applicant *:
Name: Firm:
Address:
Telephone:
Fax:
Consultant*: Civil Engineer (Discipline)
City: —
Email:
State: Zip:
Name:
Paul Oland
Firm:
The WLB Group, Inc.
Address:
4444 E. Broadway Blvd.
City:
Tucson State: AZ Zip: 85711
Telephone:
520-881-7480 Fax:
Email:
gpoland@wlbgroup.com
el
Project Description/Narrative:
We propose a small 19 lot single family subdivision on 5.74 ac.
I hereby certify that I have read and examined this application and know the same to be true and correct. I am the owner
of the property or the Owner's authorized representative, and if not the owner, I have obtained the owner's permission to
perform stated work. All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this type of work will be complied with whether
specified herein or not. The approval of this application does not presume to give authority to violate or cancel the
provisions of any other federal, state or local law for which this project may be subject to.
Notice: It is the applicant/owner's responsibility to ensure all private rules and regulations (such as Covenants, Conditions
& Restrictions (CC&R's)) of the subdivision and/or commercial center are adhered to. Contact your Home Owners
Association or property management to determine applicable requirements.
It is also the applicant's responsibility to coordinate with all outside agencies to secure their acceptance or clearance.
Failure to do so may delay issuance of permits. See attached list of agencies.
r-1for Paul Oland 3/27/18
Applicant's Signature Print Name Date
Important Note: All submittals received after 4:00 p.m. will be processed the next day
Submittals will be rejected if:
• Not folded using Pima County fold & collated;
• There are missing items on the checklist unless otherwise approved by Planning Division Manager or Town Engineer.
• Re -submittals cannot be accepted without a transmittal and a written narrative summary describing the purpose of
submittal.
7
1.3 FINAL PLAT - SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
NO APPLICATION FOR FINAL PLAT WILL BE ACCEPTED UNTIL THE APPLICANT HAS
SCHEDULED AND COMPLETED A PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE WITH PLANNING AND
ENGINEERING STAFF MEMBERS.
All applications for Final Plat must include the following materials to be accepted for
processing:
0 Fees To be submitted under separate cover
21 A completed General Application Form
❑ Approved Final Site Plan with all conditions addressed (3 copies)
❑ Approved Landscape, Irrigation and Rainwater Harvesting Plan (3 copies)
14 Final Plat (5 copies) (electronic copy will be required, after initial staff review, for agenda
packets)
❑ All items included in Section 2.0 of this process guide (5 copies).
A Signed Notification of Potential State and Federal Issues
❑ Improvement Plans (2 copies)
14 Lot closure and street centerline calculations with coordinate references to identifiable
points shown on plat (1 copy)
❑ Approved Hydrology Report (2 copies)
0 Complete Title Report, current to within 45 days of submittal (2 copies)
❑ Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) (2 copies; 1 original and 1 copy)
❑ Aerial photograph (8.5" x 11" format), showing size and location of property and existing
streets. (5 copies)
7
I , CLERK OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY,
HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS APPROVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL
OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ON THE DAY OF . 20
CLERK, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY DATE
PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER DATE
RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT
TOWN ENGINEER DATE
PLANNING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR DATE
WATER UTILITY DIRECTOR DATE
ASSURANCES
ASSURANCES IN THE FORM OF FROM AS
REr'_ DED IN SEQUENCE NO. HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO GUARANTEE
DRAINAGE AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS (INCLUDING MONUMENTS) AND U11UTY IMPROVEMENTS
(ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, GAS, SEMR, WATER) IN THE SUBDIVISION.
BY:
MAYOR - TOWN OF ORO VALLEY DATE
ASSURANCES IN THE FORM OF FROM , IN
THE AMOUNT OF HAVE BEEN PROVIDED TO GUARANTEE THE RESEEDING OF THIS
SUBDIVISION IN THE EVENT THE PROJECT IS ABANDONED.
WATER ADEQUALTI11117
THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY HAS BEEN DESIGNATED BY THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT WATER
RESOURCES AS HAVING AN ASSURED WATER SUPPLY, PURSUANT TO ARS §45-576 AND
HEREBY CERTIFIES IN WRITING TO SUPPLY WATER TO THIS SUBDIVISION.
BY:
WATER UTILITY DIRECTOR DATE
RECORDING ATA
STATE OF ARIZONA) SS FEE
)
COUNTY OF PIMA ) No.
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS FILED FOR RECORD AT THE REQUEST OF THE
WLB GROUP, INC., ON THIS DAY OF
20 AT M. IN SEQUENCE NO. . THEREOF.
F. ANN RODRIGUEZ, PIMA COUNTY RECORDER
BY:
DEPUTY FOR PIMA COUNTY RECORDER DATE
CERTIFICATION
i HERESY CERTIFY THAT THE BOUNDARY SURVEY SHOWN ON THIS PLAT WAS PERFORMED
UNDER MY DIRECTION AND THAT ALL EXISTING AND/OR PROPOSED SURVEY MONUMENTS
AND MARKERS SHOWN ARE CORRECTLY DESCRIBED. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT
WAS PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECTION.
Q
a TE SG��
44121 �
PETER D. COTE, RLS 44121 PETER E D.
OTD
o� T Z' t
�NED i
no
EXPIRES
EXPIRES 3/31/2018
ROBERT W. SCHLICHER, PE 54544
EXPIRES 6/30/2019
SHEET INDEX
SHEET 1 COVER SHEET
SHEET 2 PLAN SHEET
SHEET 3 TABLES & DETAILS
GRACE HOLDINGS, LLC & J.D.W.
INVESTMENTS MANAGEMENT, LLC
1121 WARNER RD. #109
TEPE, AZ 8524
ATTN: DICK MAES
RICHARDM@WHOLDINGS.COM
ENGINEER
THE WLB GROUP
4444 E. BROADWAY BLVD.
TUCSON, AZ 86711
(520) 881-7480
ATTN:PETER COTE
PCOTE@WLBGROUP.COM
FINAL PLAT
RANCHO VISTOSO PARCEL 10-T
OV1800xxx
2
�b
-
A"
P
2 23 NEf
2 26 -
NEIGH.10
I PARCEL B
i
{
4
rP/
J
Q
Q
a
►Za
U
3"=1 MILE
0\o0
G
��.
�0
�oA'9,e
TOWN LIMITS I SUNRIDGE It RANCHO VISTOSO
MOONRIDGE LOTS 1-65 /NEIGH. 7 UNIT 1
LOTS 1_48 48/033 M&PI LOTS 1-317 411100
51/072 M&P
4
All
r r
•i .•. t :1 ,i ,, a •
! k 1 i • t • � t t �•,
! i •' a 1 It
t i' i tr tit
t t. i i. �,
r / � ,.., � k• a _. 1 i : •ate i 1
1
_ • r: i f t•
a • i r i .r i t ,r
:, :1 ! .►t / 1 '1 / i ■ t
! • t a r - r r . r r
: t "t , • , • - / 1 1 + . r,. � 1
! r i t t' 1 1 t : � i +r' ! '
..t.,•
i x r. i t ! ,• •i ! a
•`• •. •. • f •�i r.r •`
ra x • a r i i a! t a ! � � 1 #ir i
■ :! * , •,• / , � r r t . ,...t
■! � i' Ix k I ■ it/ /- ■+ i ■ ii1 a !
i t•i t, t
• r , a -x r•k i `. r ! •: r i' �: • 1 t x a �`
i. • 1. , � a • t a 4. � • k • • +. r , #
i � , . , 1, x i • i.. x -:'. ! r � a . a . � • � r. t • • • x 1 !: i
t . t. a •. •t � rrt.• r
t c � • i'.. ••�•.' '.':i �,.: • 4.: r x: • is
t 4 k t k t t a � x k r . t .i.:
1 • , , ` , , , .. ■ , r . k t k: • � k. 1 • • . i • x. a !. • a. i
•
••i i t t•1 i i� r � f
,r � : r
_
. • a
- �, ; i i i • . a r , / , i. � r 1 . a i r •.
i t r t t t t * • r
! t � ! • a ! • i !' r ! i'' �
• k t r � x r!. t r r
r
i ,r
LOCATION MAP
PORTION OF •
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY,
ARIZONA
LEGEND
SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY
RIGHT OF WAY
PARCEL LINE
- - - - - - - EASEMENT LINE
- - SECTION LINE
ZONING BOUNDARY
P.U.E. PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
® BRASS DISK SURVEY MONUMENT TO BE SET BY AN
RLS UPON COMPLETION OF ROAD CONSTRUCTION
■ FOUND MONUMENT
1 /2" REBAR W/ TAG TO BE SET BY AN RLS
UPON COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTS
FOUND 1 /2" REBAR W/ TAG 12214
FND GLO BRASS CAP AT SECTION CORNER f
QUARTER SECTION CORNER
®li
� 1►► '�I►' s�� rv:
_� rr,,,1�. _ r�� I .►
18. NO IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN THIRTY (30) AND SEVENTY-TWO (72) INCHES IN HEIGHT RELATIVE TO THE OF ALL COMMON AREAS AND PRIVATE DRAINAGEWAYS WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION AS SHOWN HEREON. P. A. D. ZONING MAP
ADJACENT ROADWAY WHICH MIGHT INTERFERE WITH THE PURPOSE AND INTENT OF THE SIGHT VISIBILITY RANCHO VISTOSO
TRIANGLE SHALL BE PERMITTED, PLACED OR MAINTAINED WITHIN THE SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLES
SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. THIS .PROJECT 3"=1 MILE
19. PROPERTY OWNERS SHALL MAINTAIN PLANTINGS TO ENSURE UNOBSTRUCTED VISIBILITY TO MOTORISTS.
ALL SHRUBS, ACCENTS AND GROUNDCOVERS SHALL NOT EXCEED THIRTY (30) INCHES IN HEIGHT WITHIN
THE SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLES. TREES WITHIN THE SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLES WILL BE MAINTAINED TO TITLE SECURITY AGENCY, LLC A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY DATE
ENSURE THAT BRANCHES/FOLIAGE IS NOT BELOW A HEIGHT OF SEVENTY-TWO (72) INCHES. COMPANY.
20. ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY SHALL BE THE WATER SERVICE PROVIDER.
21. INTERIOR PROPERTY CORNERS AND CENTERLINE MONUMENTATION SHALL BE SET AS SOON AS NOTARY
COMPLETION OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE AND IMPROVEMENTS MAKE IT PRACTICAL TO DO SO. IF SUCH
MONUMENTS SHOULD DIFFER FROM THE TYPE DESCRIBED ON THE FINAL PLAT, A RECORD OF SURVEY
STATE OF ARIZONA ) )SS
FEE
-
PLAT SHALL BE RECORDED SHOWING THESE DIFFERENCES.
COUNTY OF PIMA )
No.
'1 2018
22. ALL PROSPECTIVE BUYERS OF LOTS WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION SHALL BE INFORMED OF THE PRESENCE
MAR
AND ACTIVITY OF THE LA CHOLLA AIRPARK, A PRIVATE AIRPARK LOCATED SOUTHWEST OF THE
PROJECT. ALL PERSPECTIVE BUYERS SHALL BE INFORMED THAT LOW FLYING AIRCRAFT MAY BE A
ON THIS, THE
DAY OF . 2018, BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED
OV1800xxx
BY: •.....................,
NUISANCE.
PERSONALLY APPEARED,
WHO ACKNOWLEDGED SELF TO
BE
FINAL T
23. NO FINAL INSPECTION FOR ANY LOT WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION SHALL BE APPROVED UNTIL A BUILDING
THE LOT IS COMPLETE AND SIDEWALKS HAVE
EXECUTED THE FORGOING
OF BEING AUTHORIZED SO TO DO$
INSTRUMENT FOR THE PURPOSE THEREIN CONTAINED BY THEMSELVES
AS OWNERS,
RANCHO
VISTOSO10--
T
CODES OFFICIAL HAS VERIFIED THAT CONSTRUCTION ON
BEEN INSTALLED, PROPERTY LINE TO PROPERTY LINE.
LOTS I THRU 19., AND COMMON AREA "A"
24. THE AREA BETWEEN THE 100 YEAR FLOOD LIMITS REPRESENTS AN AREA THAT MAY BE SUBJECT TO
FLOODING FROM A 100 YEAR FREQUENCY FLOOD AND ALL LAND IN THIS AREA WILL BE RESTRICTED TO
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:
NOTARY PUBLIC
A PORTION OF SECTION
26 TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE
13 EAST, G.&.S.R.M.,
USES THAT ARE COMPATIBLE WITH FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT AS APPROVED BY THE TO ENGINEER.
Ref#: OV1913-001
TOWN OF
ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARI ZONA
OV1500657
SHEET 1 OF 3
OV1701671
MARCH, 2018
140'
O•
23 24
26 25
FND BCSM
SW COR SEC 26
T-11 S, R-13E
1 RANCHO VISTOSO
NEIGH 10 PARCEL U -�
88 SEQ. #20060220003 I -
ZONING: P.A.D. MHDR j 18
90
} 19
S89'5051"W 380.81'
- NEST ESMT - -, 378.72'
DKT. 1 Z802, PG. 1098 Cy/ 023 20
o - J N89'49'52"E
S89'49'S2"W - 21.26'
55.00' 0 46.26' _ "'�� •01,21�� , �
21.2 ' cyT \ P,200,
C1p r✓g SFF 0 /
9`` 'S / !� FTS 411 �.6 5,666 sq.ft.
NEW SW GAS ESMT -I yNG� 90.13 or; r� r
BY SEPARA INSTRUMENT I
6>
2
10' BUFFERYARD 'A' l24 5,158 sq.ft.
�- - ,N ' �6 mod'- 0.12 or-- 1)00
21 i 10
55.00 55.00 I �w S6�• 10
5,460 sq.ft. C25 �'� \ \\ �N69p1 o
-1/2 ROW 1/2 ROW 4358 11 acres ►oo`L'un
i.
3 -�
N //��o \:r C20 5,041 sq.ft.
LU 00
/ _� �' � Sg�,/ / � a , ti SIGHT 0.12 v �- 1'\2', � \
18 ti VISIBILITY �`\ ,p121
5,773 sq.ft. / -� �\ �N69 \ o
G `� ( S74'Ol'S "113 acres /^ ��/ TRIANGLE �\ y RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGH 10
Q I " �N� ` 4 E >> / ��,^ v SEE DETAIL \ 5 040 sq.ft.
' "'�•. PARCEL S V
J I N ` SHEET 3 \2 \ o SEQ. #20060220003
Q a o / o C36 Q0. \ 0.1221„� / i �+ oo� ZONING: P.A.D. MHDR
VZ " 17 I ��
Y m I 6,907 sq.ft. 5 ss
cli00
�. 0.16 acres 1 25.00 25.0 ' 2 \ 5,040 sq.ft.
J L - - _j /2 ROW 1 2 0 `�� J\ �'� �, \ 0.12
Z L w" /ROW '�, o gp121 i o o ,,
o, In cli 00 r-N90 00 00 W 117.09 C29 Q a, �''s \ �N6 � - CA A
rn N.
o o 16 I N I v \ QVE 6 58,355 sq.ft.
o 5,194 sq.ft. I ov 'c' CA A 5,040 sq.ft. 1.34 acres
v' rn `� 0.12 acres I 6,071 sq.ft. \� 0.12 a� Op
- - _j i � L2 0.14 acres ^ Ns o\\
o r--N90'0O'00"W 113.68' I L5 •3g1 �E ��, o_ \ �N6gp j i \o
vi r 6 \
0 00 z C�8 N 23.p4' \ 5,040 sq.ft.
,
ZI i�l 0 15 I o \ a 112pp
v� :- 6,623 sq.ft. 13 10 - 1g.g2 \as �\ 0.12 a
"w 1,
rZ cn 0.15 acres 3g 00 A p •o
'Sp»� 119 c� N OAKHURST LOOP L1 C5 \
-N120s • Q�� (PUBLIC) p"VS �3 " �� ,P \ 5,08
40 sq.ft. p
C34 00 \ 0.12 v�- NNT i
E y�y � cs:\ .p1,21 � �s
C33 wN <' ors C19�-N69 �o
r- �; \ `''s \ 5,113 sq.ft. '
DR�1�1� WrESMT r� N 0.12
AT � ,-o v •p1' 21 i v'
�\ > \ THIS PL ^§°' \ ,,�.299 sq.ft.`
'012 acres
ooj, ^,� W 12 �, N ; v
6,295 sq.ft. ` r 10
•�S8/Oy 8775 s .ft. 0 0.14 acres rI 5,481 sq.ft.
' q I T_ N 0 25.00 i 0.13 acres 0
I ���, \ 0.20 acres 325.0 " 1 I ,\12�
CA A �oQy, goo\ I I ,-p� /2 Row 1 /2 Row I •1, 21E
• �23,543 sq.ft. / \ N89'49'52" E N89'49'52"E �� �36 C16- N69� 10' BUFFERYARD 'A
0.54 acres 1 � - � L_ -.' rW �5 I 0
• \ - - - I T 47.46 41.34 _ S ,�.�p 44 - L L3 C40 - -- L
..�'" 263.10' 1 V�50.00 `= 50.00' 203.72'
R=25.00� N89'49'52"E 566.81' ELECTRIC ESMT
L=39.27 ELECTRIC ESMT 10 BUFFERYARD A DKT. 12925, PG. 5204
A--90600'00" PUBLIC DRAINAGE DKT. 12925, PG. 5204
ESMT PER THIS PLAT w
100 YEAR FLOOD LINE SEE DETAIL SHEET 3 N ,cvr 00 o _a
SEE DETAIL SHEET 3 C) o o f
0
SEWER ESMT V) W MOORE ROAD
1318.49393.10' DKT. 11036, PG. 448 (PUBLIC) 303.77'
FND BCSM S89'4952"W 2636.99' (DKT. 12284, PG. 2006)
RLS 12214
Engineering • Planning • Surveying
Th le Landscape Architecture • Urban Design
�� Offices located in Tucson, Phoenix,
Flagstaff, AZ. and Las Vegas, NV.
4444 East Broadway
Group Tucson, Arizona (520) 881-7480
0' 40' 80' 120'
N
0
cn
0
0
EXPIRES 3/31/2018
EXPIRES 6/30/2019
VISTOSO HIGHLANDS
m
j 23 i
i
r:
FND BCSM
RLS 12214
27
24
410
zs /
621.62' AfI �25
224
FND BCSM
Sj COR SEC 26
T-11 S, R-13E
SEQ. #20040930020 OV 1800xxx
ZONING: R1-20 FINAL PLAT
RANCHO VISTOSO PARCEL 10-- T
LOTS 1 THRU 19, AND COMMON AREA "A"
A PORTION OF SECTION 26 TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, G.&S.R.M.,
Ref#:OV1913-001 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA I
OV1500657
OV1701671 MARCH, 2018 1» = 40' SHEET 2 OF 3
CURVE TABLE
CURVE #
LENGTH
RADIUS
DELTA
C1
72.28'
200.00'
20°42'25"
C2
83.31'
50.00'
95027'59"
C3
39.27'
25.00'
90'00'00"
C4
63.25'
175.00'
20'42'25"
C5
35.98'
25.00'
82*28'13"
C6
123.68'
60.00'
118'06'36"
C7
126.26'
206.00'
35'07'05"
C8
36.68'
25.00'
84'04'31"
C9
133.97'
175.00'
43'51'46"
C10
39.27'
25.00'
90'00'00"
C11
28.98'
25.00'
66'25'30"
C12
272.11'
225.00'
6917'35"
C13
81.32'
225.00'
20o42'25"
C14
39.27'
25.00'
90'00'00"
C15
12.47'
25.00'
28*35'10"
C16
5.75'
25.00'
13*11'10"
C17
34.84'
225.00'
8*52'17"
C18
45.33'
225.00'
11'32'35"
C19
1.15'
225.00'
O'17'33"
C20
9.13'
225.00'
2'19'26"
LINE TABLE
LINE #
LENGTH
DIRECTION
L1
3.79'
S76'39'14"W
L2
3.82'
S07'52'47"E
L3
17.04'
S89'49'52"W
L4
2.09'
S89050'51 "W
L5
3.82'
N07'52'47"W
CURVE TABLE
CURVE #
LENGTH
RADIUS
DELTA
C21
45.53'
225.00'
11'35'42"
C22
47.99'
225.00'
12*13'12"
C23
169.47'
225.00'
43*09'15"
C24
26.45'
25.00'
60'36'30"
C25
10.24'
25.00'
23'28'01"
C26
35.50'
206.00'
9'52'25"
C27
42.88'
206.00'
11'55'39"
C28
41.02'
206.00'
11'24'33"
C29
6.86'
206.00'
1'54'29"
C30
20.81'
60.00'
19*52'19"
C31
36.03'
60.00'
34'24'08"
C32
35.97'
60.00'
34*21'10"
C33
30.87'
60.00'
29'28'59"
C34
0.10'
25.00'
013'58"
C35
35.88'
25.00'
82*14'15"
C36
62.73'
25.00'
143'45'54"
C37
42.56'
25.00'
97'31'47"
C38
41.66'
25.00'
95'27'59"
C39
63.27
156.00'
23#14'20"
100 YEAR FLOOD LINE TABLE
LINE #
LENGTH
DIRECTION
FL6
30.36'
N72'24'36"E
FL7
7.88'
N07'46'20"W
FL8
4.88'
N39'07'02'E
FL9
4.78'
N07'05'33"E
FL10
25.25'
N63'29'14"W
FL11
18.37'
N54'45'46"W
FL12
31.02'
N56'14'43"W
FL13
16.27'
N87'19'43"W
FL14
33.80'
S01'05'02'W
FL15
1.43'
S29'41'05"W
FL16
18.34'
S01'42'58"E
FL17
7.95'
S37'29'43"E
FL18
8.00'
S89"3857"E
FL19
6.05'
N82'29'37"E
FL20
14.05'
S85'14'22"E
FL21
13.56'
S73'25'30"E
FL22
3.36'
S65'24'00"E
ThQ Engineering • Planning • Surveying
1. Landscape Architecture • Urban Design
Wt�� Offices located in Tucson, Phoenix,
Flagstaff, AZ. and Las Vegas, NV.
Group JIR
4444 East Broadway
Tucson, Arizona (520) 881-7480
wl
EXPIRES 3/31/2018
1
0
o
\
00
re ;001
u"A 'A'
e-0�
j S44'28'12"W
26.63'
SVT TIE
f
11
SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE DETAIL
SCALE: 1'=30'
' 54544 '
ROBERT W
SCHUCHER
3®2,2-d
EXPIRES 6/30/2019
rialmlia'I�
SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE DETAIL
SCALE: 1'=30'
�r-
u7
00
e SVT 11E
SO
FL13
•�•\ \ , Spp,
�� 2 •�• �� ' S 13
I� ` ��/ //`` ®,
kFL15 100 YEAR FLOOD LINE F �0®••• �`�,3
�� FL8 o I o
®I
l FL18 �• z `J -
rr LFL2
FI-19FL20'30.48 l
S89'49'52"W 71.02'
PUBLIC DRAINAGE EASEMENT ANI
I>! YEAR FLOOD LINE DETAIL
ReW OV 1913-001
OV1500657
OV1701671
SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE DETAIL
SCALE: 1'=30'
OV 18 0x
FINAL PLAT
RANCHO VISTOSO PARCEL 10- T
LOTS 1 THRU 19, AND COMMON AREA "A"
A PORTION OF SECTION 26 TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, G.&S.R.M.,
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA
MARCH, 2018 1" = 40'
SHEET 3 OF 3
W D
Grop�up� �
Engineering • Planning • Surveying • Urban Design • Landscape Architecture
Offices located in Tucson, Phoenix, Flagstaff, Las Vegas • E-mail tucson@wlbgroup.com
4444 East Broadway, Tucson, Arizona • (520) 881-7480 • (520) 881-7492 fax
Transmittal
To: Milini Simms
Date: March 1, 2018
Town of Oro Valley Job No.: 181057-YO03-0200
�F nTF'a
11,000 N. La Canada Drive'
MAR 0 1 2018
Subject: Nakoma Sky — Rainwater Harvestinq Plan, Final Submittal OV1601351
We Transmit Z Herewith ❑ Under Separate Cover ❑ Via
Material Format
Requested Action
❑ Letter O Redlines
❑ For Your Approval 21 Your Review
❑ Memo ❑ Clarification Drawing
❑ For Your Signature ❑ Please Comment
❑ Report ❑ Modification Drawing
❑ Information ❑ Make Recommendation
❑ Check ❑ Myars
❑ Resubmit ❑ Issue Construction Order
❑ Disk ❑ Draft Drawings
❑ As Requested
Comments: Attached, please find:
■ Three (3) sets of blacklines of the Final Rainwater Harvesting Plan per your 12/22/17 letter
---
■ One (1) CD containing a PDF copy
of the Final Rainwater Harvesting Plan
Milini — per our FLIP response letter dated 2/20/18 attached are the 3 sets of blacklines of the final RWH plan.
Please give me a call at 390-1086 if you have any questions or require additional information.
Thank vou!
Copies To:
Received
Signed: Linda Thompson
Date:
GENERAL NOTES
1. TOTAL AREA 01F ALL NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACES
INCLUDING PAVEMENTS, SIDEWALKS, HARDSCAPE AND
BUILDINGS IS 18.4 AC (801,504 S.F.)
2. TOTAL VOLUME OF RAINWATER HARVESTING PROVIDED
IS 9,048 CUBIC FEET.
3. RAINWATER HARVESTING MEASURES EMPLOYED FOR THIS
DEVELOPMENT CONSISTS OF THE FOLLOWING:
• RAINWATER HARVESTING BASINS
• DEPRESSED LANDSCAPE AREAS, 4"
4. ALL RAINWATER HARVESTING MEASURES SHOWN ON THIS
PLAN SHALL BE INTERGRATED INTO THE LANDSCAPE
INSTALLATION AS WELL AS THE SITE GRADING
CONSTRUCTION.
5. EIGHTY (80) PERCENT OF ALL AREAS WITHIN LINEAR BUFFER
YARDS, RECREATION AREAS AND COMMON AREAS TO BE
GRADED TO A MINIMUM FOUR (4) INCHES FOR RAINWATER
HARVESTING PURPOSES.
RAINWATER HARVESTING REQUIRED
18.4 AC X 3,000 GAL/AC=55,200 GALLONS =7,380 CUBIC FEET
RAINWATER HARVESTING PROVIDED
RAINWATER HARVESTING BASIN #1: 2,626 GALLONS = 351 CUBIC FEET
DEPRESSED LANDSCAPE AREAS: 65,058 GALLONS = 8,697 CUBIC FEET
TOTAL: 67,684 GALLONS = 9,048 CUBIC FEET
un
w w I
Q
cl-
v
J CD
z o m
CD <c O
N O
<c m
z
Q
U
FND f" REBAR
>W COR SEC 6
T-12S, R-14E
126
7
_
'.—
o
'
N
I
cN
o
1 � 1
0,1,fjk•1
ADMINISTRATIVE ADDRESS: 10930 N 1ST AVE
N89'10'07"W 2517.66'
TEMPORARY PARKING ---- -- --
LOT (FUTURE PARKINGFff��
STRUCTURE)
0
FACILITIES
MANAGEMENT
BUILDING 6
WEST INDEPENDENT
LIVING APARTMENT
MEET 4
PROJECT BUILDING 5 SHEET 8
BOUNDA(TYP.) CENTRAL INDEPENDENT
3 LIVING APARTMENTS
6 � PARKING GARAGE Ij /
BUILDING 4
rn
o k` SOUTH INDEPENDENT
c� LIVING APARTMENTS
c \ BUILDING 3
\\ \ SOUTH INDEPENDENT
I > \ LIVING APARTMENTS
\ BUILDING 1
SOUTH INDEPENDENT
LIVING APARTMENTS
SHEET 6 ' 6
° \ SHEET 7
I ZONING: PAD
(COMMERCIAL/OFFICE)
VACANT LAND
�¢ Ps1 p0
\G QGr Gam/ ss, / •,�I
z / `.
ZONING: PAD ',ccq�,�j }7 tic
(COMMERCIAL/OFFICE)`,-
VACANT LAND
®' 200' 400' 600'
PROJECT OVERVIEW
SHEET INDEX
SHEET 1........... COVER SHEET
SHEET 2........... PLANT LEGEND
SHEET 3-9...... RAINWATER HARVESTING PLAN
ENGINEER
THE WLB GROUP, INC.
4444 E. BROADWAY BLVD.
TUCSON, AZ. 85711
(520) 881-7480
ATTN: ROBERT SCHLICHER, P.E.
RSCHLICHER@WLBGROUP.COM
EXISTING
CANADA DEL ORO
BANK PROTECTION
OWNER/DEVELOPER
APN 220-09-016A:
LA POSADA HOLDING CO LLC
350 EAST MORNINGSIDE
GREEN VALLEY, AZ 85614
(520) 648-7912
ATTN: JONI CONDIT
JONI@LAPOSADAGV.COM
OTHER APNS:
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE TR 9319
ATTN: LA POSADA HOLDING CO LLC
350 EAST MORNINGSIDE
GREEN VALLEY, AZ 85614
(520) 648-7912
ATTN: JONI CONDIT
JONI@LAPOSADAGV.COM
Q:\181057\Y-003 — NAKOMA SKY\02 LANDSCAPE\10 RWHP\NAKOMA RWHP-01.DWG 2/27/2018 1: 45 Plv
ZONING: R1-144
MERITAGE HOMES OF
�. ARIZONA INC
APN 220-06-0590
BUILDING 8
ASSISTED LIVING AND I
l
EMORY CARE
POOL BUILDING/ I
�o• / I l
I _ t EE_T 5_
UILDING 7 EET 9 r
!� INDEPENDENT LIVING
APARTMENTS ( I
! FITNESS BUILDING
I ARTISAN BUILDING
a
CANADA DEL ORO WASH
(DKT. 7571, PG. 800)
ZONING: PAD
PIMA COUNTY
UNSUBDIVIDED
/c SOUTH INDEPENDENT
LIVING APARTMENTS
-PUBLIC TRAIL
HEAD-DEV. AREA "C"
PROPOSED CANADA DEL ORO BANK PROTECTION
COVER SHEET
LO
00
co
0
N
O
z
FND GLO STONE
Si COR SEC 6
T_12S, R-14E
n
ZONING: R1-1 z
PIMA COUNTY FL
CONTROL DISTRI
UNSUBDIVIDEC
xr, xA
Z� Z1
LUU"A1 1 U1V MAY
A PORTION OF SECTION 7
T12S, R14E, G & S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY,
3" = 1 MILE PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA
x1 32
7
■
a
LEGEND
EXIST. MAJOR CONTOUR
IF
TOP OF SLOPE
�2849__
-'
EXIST. MINOR CONTOUR
BOTTOM OF SLOPE
PROJECT BOUNDARY
- -
EXISTING LOT LINE
--zz --
EXIST. PAVEMENT
�---� �--�
EXISTING 100 YR FLOOD PLAIN
PROPOSED CURB
�---., . , • ,��
PROPOSED 100 YR FLOOD PLAIN
— - - - -
EXIST. PUBLIC SEWER LINE & MANHOLE
EROSION HAZARD SETBACK
--
NEW PUBLIC SEWER LINE &MANHOLE
'�'•���':�'����,��---..",
" �'
404 JURISDICTION WASH AREA
_14 12" -$--
EXIST. PUBLIC WATERLINE & VALVE
PROPOSED RIPRAP
EXISTING EASEMENT LINE
PROPOSED MULTI -USE PATH
BUILDING SETBACKS
771
PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK
— —
SECTION LINE
RIGHT OF WAY CENTERLINE
PROPOSED STORM DRAIN
•52
PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
PROPOSED WALL
FG
-•
DIRECTION OF FLOW
WATERSHED BOUNDARY
SECTION CORNER OR 1 /4 CORNER
FFE=74.15
FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION
PHASE 1 GRADING LIMIT
FPE=73.48
FINISHED PAD ELEVATION
MATCHLINE
-=-
GRADE BREAK (GB/HP/LP)
--�
EX. STORM DRAIN SYSTEM
�O—
ASPHALT PAVEMENT
BY:
PLANNING & ZONING ADMINISTRATOR DATE
BY:
TOWN ENGINEER DATE
r -m r rf
11 GAF DSC,4
MAR 0 1
2a1B
', F q
34712 y°ny
OV1601351
w... .®
P ETER can
NICHOLAS 0
o R21 RAINWATER HARVESTING PLAN
S, '
R�zOUSP
NA
III
NAKOA SKY
PHASE I
on A ROONEY
ArF ��
RANCH AREA Z RECORDED IN BOOK 62
�> >p
"A",
M&P, PAGE
>► REFERENCE CASE
,
# S:
54544 tiQ �R., 4, LOTS
1-68 AND COMMON AREAS B , AND C AND OV115-027
ROBERT W A PORTION OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH,
RANGE 14 OV914-008
SCHLICHER EAST,
G & S.R.M. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA
ARIZONA
COUNTY,
OV914-007A
q��?ONp
OV903-03A
'V•
FEBRUARY 2018
(0)15-14
WLB NO. 181057-Y-003
EXPIRES 6/30/2019
CONTOUR INTERVAL: 1' SCALE: AS SHOWN
SHEET 1 OF
9
PLANT LEGEND
SYMBOL
'
`A
t
` EI
I INFOOTHILL
-
-
Ev ';
'
TREES
CELTIS RETIC:ULATA
WESTERN / NETLEAF HACKBERRY
CERCIDUM FL_ORIDUM
BLUE PALO VERDE
CERCIDUM HYBRID'DESERT MUSUEM'
DESERT MUSEUM PALO VERDE
CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM
PALO VERDE
CERCIDUM PRAECOX
PAL0 BREA
CHILOPSIS LINEARIS 'WARREN JONES' /'BUBBA'
DESERT WILLOW WARREN JONES /'BUBBA'
OLNEYA TESOTA
IRONWOOD-
PISTACIA CHINENSIS'RED PUSH'
RED PUSH PISTACHE
PITTECELLOBIUM FLEXICAULE (EBENOPSIS)
TEXAS E.._
BONY
PROSOPIS GLANDULOSA MAVERICK
MAVERICK 11 HYBRID MEQUITE
PROSOPIS HYBRID PHOENIX
PHOENIX HYBRID THORN11 LES11 S MESQUITE
PROSOPIS VELUTINA
VELVET MESQUITE
PROSOPIS VELUTINA
VELVET MESQUITE
SYM
m
SYMBOL
AGAVE VICTORIAE REGINAE
ORIA AGAVE
AGAVE VILMORINIANA
OCTOPUS AGAVE
ASCLEPIAS SUBULATA
DESERT MILKWEED
CARNEGIEA GIGANTEA (2 TRANSPLANT
SAGUARO
DASYLIRION LONGISSIMUM
TOOTHLESS SPOON
DASYLIRION WHEELERI
DESERT SPOON
ECHINOCACTUS GRUSONII
GOLDEN BARREL
EUPHORBIA ANTISYPHILLITICA
CANDELILLA
rl
Ell
13
CVRARAI
FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII
FISH—HOOK BARREL --
FOUQUIERIA SPLENDENS
OCOTILLO
HESPERALOE FUNIFERA
GIANT HESPERALOE
HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA
RED YUCCA
HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA'BRAKELIGHTS'
BRAKELIGHTS RED YUCCA
MUHLENBERGIA LINDHEIMERI
AUTUMN GLOW DEER GRASS
MUHLENBERGIA RIGENS
DEER GRASS
NOLINA MICROCARPA
BEAR GRASS
OPUNTIA ENGLEMANII
PRICKLY PEAR
OPUNTIA VERSICOLOR
BUCKHORN CHOLLA
PEDILANTHUS MACROCARPUS
LADY'S SLIPPER
YUCCA ELATA
SOAPTREE YUCCA
YUCCA RIGIDA
BLU11 E YUCCA
(TOTAL WATER AT MATURITY
'
°
COURTYARDS
ALOE BARBADENSIS
BARBADOS ALOE
ALOE FEROX / MARTLOTHII
TREE / CAPE ALOE
ASPARAGUS DENSIFLORUS SPRENGERI
ASPARAGUS FERN
BRACHYCHITON POPULNEUS
BOTTLE TREE
CALLIANDRA HYBRID SIERRA STARR
SIERRA STARR RED FAIRY DUSTER
CALLISTEMON CITRINUS
BOTTLEBRUSH
CASSIA PHYLLODINEA
SILVER CASSIA
CERCIS CANADENSIS V. MEXICANA
MEXICAN REDBUD
Q:\181057\Y-003 — NAKOMA SKY\02 LANDSCAPE\10 RWHP\NAKOMA RWHP-02.DWG 2/27/2018 11: 41 AM
PLANTING LEGEND
93
8
mu
COURTYARDS
HESPERALOE FUNIFERA
GIANT HESPERALOE
TRAILING INDIGO
EREMOPHILA MACULATA'VALENTINE'
EMU BUSH 'VALENTINE'
EUPHORBIA RESINFERA
MOROCCAN MOUND
EUPHORBIA RIGIDA
GOPHER PLANT
FICUS PUMILA
CREEPING FIG
FRAXINUS GREGGII
GREGG'S ASH
JUSTICIA SPICIGERA
MEXICAN HONEYSUCKLE
LANTANA MONTEVIDENSIS
PURPLE TRAILING LANTANA
LANTANA SPECIES 'GOLD MOUND'/'NEW GOLD'
'NEW GOLD' / GOLD MOUND LANTANA
LEUCOPHYLLUM FRUTESCENS 'GREEN CLOUD'
GREEN CLOUD TEXAS RANGER
LEUCOPHYLLUM FRUTESCENS 'HEAVENLY CLOUD'
HEAVENLY CLOUD TEXAS RANGER
LEUCOPHYLLUM PRUINOSUM 'SIERRA BOUQUET'
FRAGRANT CLOUD
MALEPHORA LUTEA
ROCKY POINT ICE PLANT
MYRTUS COMMUNIS COMPACTA
COMPACT MYRTLE ._..___........__. _.._.._.. .....y _ ..........
NANDINA DOMESTICA
HEAVENLY BAMBOO
NANDINA DOMESTICA COMPACTA'GULF STREAM'
GULF STREAM COMPACT NANDINA
OLEA EUROPAEA'SWAN HILL'
SWAN HILL OLIVE (FRUITLESS) OLIVE
PUNICA GRANATUM 'CALIFORNIA SUNSET'
CALIFORNIA SUNSET FLOWERING' POMEGRANATE
QUERCUS VIRGINIANA'HERITAGE'
HERITAGE LIVE OAK
ROSMARINUS OFFICINALIS 'HUNTINGTON CARPET'
HUNTINGTON CARPET ROSEMARY
SALVIA CLEVELANDII
CLEVELAND SAGE
SOPHORA SECUNDIFLORA
TEXAS MOUINTAIN LAUREL
TECOMA X'SUNRISE'
YELLOW BELLS
TECOMARIA CAPENSIS
CAPE HONEYSUCKLE
YUCCA PALLIDA
PALE LEAF YUCCA
YUCCA RECURVIFOLIA (PENDULA)
SOFT LEAF YUCCA
JNICUHOLAS
®V1601351
RAINWATER HARVESTING PLAN
NAKOMA SILL
PHASE I
'"r'oiFo ROONEY RANCH AREA Z RECORDED IN BOOK 62 M&P, PAGE
nrF ti o� ►► ►� ►> >► REFERENCE CASE #'S:
4, LOTS 1-68 AND COMMON AREAS TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH A , B , AND C AND OV115-027
� ROBERT w� � A PORTION OF SECTION 7, , RANGE 14 SCHICHER EAST, G & S.R.M. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, OV914-008
OV914-007A
9�e spa P ARIZONA OV903-03A
�ZONA S FEBRUARY 2018
WLB NO. 181057—Y-003 (0)15-14
EXPIRES 6/30/2019 CONTOUR INTERVAL: 1' N/A SHEET 2 OF 9
-
I -
I 1 l
Y/ l
, It
1 8 SCUPPER :. _ � �:_:.. •:::•; . ,/ / I / I 27.79___;.: A
,
I
2 CELL 7- ., ... s.Y . � - • - • ...: _.: • � ! . <� '
v
I \
F I
6 ( 1 E :L ,=
l
.�.--- — `:NEW HOWL 12.93 ,.
•V
a •.
/ .:..:. INV.-2621.25
..ww
J I
r i
i s
B.6
1
,
a
,
� I
I
Y \ ( �j
NEW HD
I
+
\ —
_.. INV 26 .34
\ /
OPEN SP E
I t : . � 4 SCUPPER ,, ... .: .: �% .,.. .
1 \.
\ NEW HDWL ' . /
_ 12 0'
9 � EL 16.17 � `
/
-i
,
r
t
y
1
L
I
Cox"
H
ATER
t.
9;
,
{ 1 V —A/ t C^
•
\�..�
, ,
0
010
MICA
,
, '
1 LLJ
� •: ;.. , : � ., .... .. �-:. 34712
PETER OV1601351
,
,NICHOLAS
wl oo RUMN a RAINWATER HARVESTING PLAN
iA
l
NAKOMA S.KY
1
4
r
,
i
� PHASE
\ \
\ 1 -
i' ROONEY RANCH AREA Z RE R BOOK 62 MBcP PAGE
j � ' ' � . •� ; �: scar
\ iREFERENCE CASE S.
_ #
f R
54544 tiQ �., 4, LOTS 1 68 AND COMMON AREAS A , B , AND C AND
- y ROB OV115-027
\ ® ml ;: _ ERT W A PORTION OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 14
■ ®-ii i i�'~■■ ■■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ �■■■ ■ �■i ■ ■ ■■■■■ ■ ■ �■� a..- �, SCHLICHER OV914-008
Engineering Planning Surveying MATCHLINE, SEE SHT. 5 or $� �,.�t�•I® — EAST, G & S.R.M. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, OV914-007A
The � 'x `� Landscape Architecture Urban Design
9�e s ARIZONA
- ` Offices located in: Tucson, Phoenix, and P OV903-03A
WLB
Flagstaff Arizona and Las Vegas Nevada. �ZONA V FEBRUARY 2018
(0)15-14
x , g 4444 E. Broadway Tucson, Az. 85711 WLB NO. 181057—Y-003
G r0up
.. (520) 8$1IBM-
-748o Q:\181057\Y-003 — NAKOMA SKY\02 LANDSCAPE\10 RWHP\NAKOMA RWHP-03.DWG 2/26/2018 2:02 PM RAINWATER HAE : PIA EXPIRES CONTOUR INTERVAL: 1' SCALE: 1"=40' SHEET 3 01=
INC.
Engineering - Planning . Surveying
The
Landscape Architecture Urban Design
Offices located in: Tucson, Phoenix, and
WLB
Flagstaff, Arizona and Los Vegas, Nevada.
G roup
4444 E. Broadway Tucson, Az. 85711
(520) 881-7480
NC,
09 1 1
409 120
34712
-..Az 4w,
12' PETER
slyi XV-1 A m m F 0 01,7160135
FFE=94.50 1 I ATCHLINE, SEE SHT. 8
- r
PAD=93.50 V
Q:\181057\Y-003 — NAKOMA SKY\02 LANDSCAPE\10 RWHP\NAKOMA RWHP-04.DWG 2/27/2018 1:38 PM
V
EXPIRES 6/30/2019
A
.NAKOMA SKY
PI-RASEI
ROONEY RANCH AREA Z RECORDED IN BOOK 62 M&P PAGE
I REFERENCE CASE f S:
4, LOTS 1-68 AND COMMON AREAS "A", "B", AND "C" AND OV115-027
A PORTION OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 14 OV914-008
EAST, G & S.R.M. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, OV914-007A
ARIZONA OV903-03A
FEBRUARY 2018
WLB NO. 181057-Y-003 (0)15-14
C014TOUR INTERVAL: 1' SCALE: 1"=40' SHEET
�.� / L
W /jj
r
Zi J ii R 1.
0.0
d
PROPOSED
TRAIL
WATERSHED =° I
-
BOUNDARY, .= .
TYPICAL
. 1
126101
S C4 \ I
I. .
�-F
1.= 0,78
WSCs ` --�-26
2600 9 " LAND AC5 PE :r -
MAINTEIXA
YAR
01.01
1 EASEMENT I•
�t
M
CS 17 WSE: 2602.E
CS 16
WSE: 2601.7
- — CS 15
WSE.2600.7
_ — CS 13 _S, .-11 1
WSE:2597.9 1
A■■■�■■
il
he Engineering . Planning • . Surveying
f �r Landscape Architecture Urban Design
/� /� � Offices located in: Tucson, Phoenix, and 4
V V L �h Flagstaff, Arizona and Las Vegas, Nevada
f
' 4444 E. Broadway Tucson, Az. 85711
INC. - a.F ,. (520) 881-7480 IQ: \181057\Y-003 — NAKOMA SKY\02 LANDSCAPE\10 RWHP\NAKOMA RWHP-05.DWG 2/27/2018 1:51 PM
RAINWATER HARVESTING PLAN
0' 4 0' 805 12 0'
k
JNICHUOLAS
V1601351
RAINWATE HARVESTING PLAN
NAKOMA SKY
PHASE i
. ROONEY RANCH AREA Z RECORDED iN BOOK 62 M&P, PAGE
rF % �► REFERENCE CASE #'S:
54544 tiQ ��., 4, LOTS 1-68 AND COMMON AREAS "A", B , AND C AND OV115-027
ROBERT W A PORTION OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 14
SCHUCHER EAST, G & S.R.M. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, OV914-008
$r a-2.b-t� OV914-007A
ARIZONA
OV903-03A
�ZONA U s FEBRUARY 2018
WLB NO. 181057-Y-003 (0)15-14
EXPIRES 6/30/2019 CONTOUR INTERVAL: 1' SCALE: 1"=40' SHEET
! T i 1 1 LJOJ.V .\ \ L , ■ 7 9 9
\181057\Y-003 - NAKOMA SKY\02 LANDSCAPE\10 RWHP\NAKOMA RWHP-06.DWG 2/27/2018 2:08 PM
RAINWATER HARV --�i�1 i, PLAN
0 40 80 I zu
Mow
a 34712
PETER v c 0 013 51
z NICHOLAS
RUMNEY INAI N A 1 LR HARVESTING PLAN
Sj A NAKOMA SJLii
PHASE ASS' I
Arf�FROONEY RANCH AREA Z RECORDED IN BOOK 62 M&P, PAGE ,
4, LOTS 1-68 AND COMMON AREAS "A", "B", AND "C" AND REFERENCE CASE # S:
S4544 �4 ��., ROBERT W A PORTION OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 14 OV115-027
SCHUCHER EAST, G & S.R.M. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, OV914-008
-m. ARIZONA OV914-007A
9 � �'�° P• NA 5 FEBRUARY 2018 OV903-03A
WLB NO. 181057-Y-003 (0)15-14
EXPIRES 6/30/2019 CONTOUR INTERVAL: 1' SCALE: 1 "=40' SHEET
�, , i / �AIt-
REFERENCE CASE #'S:
4 LOTS 1-68 AND COMMON AREAS A, ,r B �, AND C„ AND OV115-027
ROBERT W A PORTION OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 14 _
008
t EAST, G & S.R.M. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY,
Q
Engineering Planning Surveying \ ` \' �` j \ Oar@ �E OV914-007A
R .�
The �t AN Landscape Architecture • 1Fban Design � `� \ �/ \ \
sp \ \ \ SP OV903 03A
S, ARIZONA
�p Offices located m Tucs n/ Phoenix and
pNq w• FEBRUARY 2018 _
WLB WLB NO 181057 Y
Q
Flagstaff, Arizona and Lbs Vegas, Nevada.
\�
�£ i 4444 E. Broadway Tucson, Az. 85711 EXPIRES 6 30 2019 Q03 _ (0)15 14
V ��� t 3 • ;x: (s20) 881-7480 Ct: 181057 Y-003 - NAKOMA SKY 02 LANDSCAPE 10 RWHP NAKOMA RWHP-07.DWG 2 27 2018 2:15 PM CONTOUR INTERVAL: 1 SCALE: 1 =40 SHEET EET 7 OF
\ \ \ \ \ / / RAINWATER HARVESTING PLAN
\-LOW FLOW CROSSING (PHASE 1A�
�� fd �� - -V�i� ��� �i -- -. / �* I PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE (PHASE 1B)
TEngineering - Planning . Surveying
he rw Rav
Landscape Architecture•
Urban Design
tap
WLB
Offices located in: Tucson, Phoenix, and
Q. k
Flagstaff, Arizona and Los Vegas, Nevada.
4444 E. Broadway Tucson, Az. 85711
G roup NC. (520) 881-7480
2.
S t
113K. --97
404 JURISDICTION
9( k7n
TO BE ADONTI)
Al
WASH AREA (TYP)
tN IN R
BUfLDING #1
SOUTH•
'INDEPENDENT #
LIVING
APARTMENTS FIRE ACCESS LANE-J 41
1 TO 4—STORIES
W 01
FFE=83.00
IPAD=82.061-
-Z a -
t
J: "l, I OO-YR FEM A
FLO DPLAIN
*
BUILDING #2 k
SOUTHEAS
70'x12' PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE/'
S
INDEPENDENT -b
"00
LIVING
APARTMENTS 50' N5URALI BUFFERYARD
C6
2
1 TO 5—STORIES d 34712 o
PROJECT BOUNDARY PETER
....... .. . ..
NICHOLAS
S EY Itj
S
i%\\
IVA vSP
FIRE ACCESS LANE
. ...........
/001
R
Q11
0
P, A 4,
54544 ;9
ROBERT W
A
PROPOSED 16' WIDE ........... . ... ... -A 50' OPEN SPACE AREA WITH
.0e
MULTI —USE PATH OVER SOIL SCHLICHER
/10' ENHANCED BUFFERYARP C
000,
CEMENT BANK PROTECTION
EXPIRES 6/30/2019
Q:\181057\Y-00,3 NAKOMA SKY\02 LANDSCAPE\10 RWHP\NAKOMA RWHP-08.DWG 2/27/2018 2:29 PmRAINWATER HARVESTING PL
01 9
40' 80' 120
0V1601351
0
RAINWATER HARVESTING PLAN
V AKOMA SKY
PHASE I
-) WF RANCH PF 7 RECORDED IN BOOK 62 M&P PAGE I REFERENCE CASE #'S:
LOTS 1-68 AND COMMON AREAS "A", "B", AND "C" AND OV115-027
PORTION OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 14 OV914-008
EAST, G & S.R.M. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA OV914-007A
OV903-03A
FEBRUARY 2018 (0)15-14
WLB NO. 181057—Y-003
CONTOUR INTERVAL: 1' SCALE: 1"=40' SHEET 13 777
xx
Community Development and Public Works
October 16, 2017
Paul Oland
The W LB Group, Inc.
4444 E. Broadway Blvd
Tucson, AZ 85711
gpoland(a)wlbgroup.com
Re: Shannon Road Type 2 General Plan Amendment and Rezoning
East side of Shannon Road, south of Ironwood Ridge High School
Action Letter, OV1701072 & OV1701617
Dear Mr. Oland,
During their regularly scheduled meeting on October 3, 2017, the Planning and Zoning Commission
recommended approval of the following applications related to the aforementioned project:
Type 2 General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation from Rural Low Density
Residential to Low Density Residential -1, subject to the following conditions:
a. The entry gate to the proposed development shall be located no further than 75' from the
rear property line of Lot 1.
b. The large Saguaro Cactus with multiple arms, located along Shannon Road and across
from Sahuaro Divide, shall be preserved in place.
2. Rezoning request to change the zoning district from R1-144 to R1-36, which includes ESL Flexible
Design Options and is subject to the enclosed conditions.
The next step is for both items to be considered by Town Council on December 6, 2017 at 6 PM in Council
Chambers. The applicant is expected to attend this meeting.
If you have any questions, please contact me at Msimms(aa)orovalleyaz.gov or 520-229-4836.
Best regards,,
Milini Simms
Planner
Msimms(aborovalleyaz.gov
520-229-4836
cc: File
Oro Valley, it's in our nature.
11000 N. La Canada Drive, Oro Valley, Arizona 85737
www.orovalleyaz.gov I phone: (520) 229-4800 1 fax: (520) 742-1022
Shannon Rd.
Rezoning Conditions of Approval
1. Flat roof homes shall be limited to 18', one-story and gable -roof homes shall
be limited to 23', one-story.
2. A rustic or western design typically used in a rural -ranch context, using steel,
wood or other materials compatible to the surrounding area, shall be used for
the entry gate and entryway sign. Only native landscaping found in the
immediate area shall also be used at the entrance.
3. The entry gate to the proposed development shall be located no further than
75' from the rear property line of Lot 1.
4. Streetlights shall not be permitted on internal streets within the development.
5. The Native Plant Preservation Waiver has been partially approved to not
include any Ironwood Trees or Saguaro Cacti.
6. The design shown on the Tentative Development Plan represents a condition
of Rezoning. Noteworthy elements for neighborhood compatibility include:
a. Density restricted to a maximum of 80 lots.
b. Minimum lot size shall be 8,750 square feet.
c. Lots along the western perimeter and nearest to Shannon Rd. shall be
a minimum of one-third acre.
d. The area preserved as Environmentally Sensitive Open Space
(ESOS), ranging from 300' to 600' feet from the southern property line
and 300' to 450' from the western property line, shall be owned and
maintained by the HOA and protected by the Town of Oro Valley,
through a conservation easement on the Final Plat.
7. The developer shall construct a south -bound left -turn lane with associated
widening at the Shannon Road/Sahuaro Divide intersection as recommended
by the Traffic Impact Analysis. Construction of the turn lane is to be
completed prior to the subdivision's public opening for home sales.
8. The developer shall construct a south -bound left -turn lane at the Shannon
Road/Owl Vista Place intersection. Construction of the turn lane is to be
completed prior to the subdivision's public opening for home sales.
9. The developer shall construct a north -bound left -turn lane with associated
widening at the Shannon Road/Sahuaro Divide intersection as agreed to by
the developer in coordination with the surrounding neighbors. Construction of
the turn lane is to be completed prior to the subdivision's public opening for
home sales.
10.The developer shall provide an in -lieu fee for the construction of a 10-foot
wide asphalt shared -use path on the east side of Shannon Road, along the
entirety of the project's right-of-way frontage. The fee for the multi -use path
must be provided to the Town, prior to building permits being issued.
11.On-site detention basins shall be required to be designed and constructed so
as to have the effect of decreasing the 2-, 10-, 50- and 100-year pre-existing
storm water flow rates by 15%-25%, as deemed appropriate relative to design
constraints by the Town Engineer, for drainage exiting the property along the
southern boundary. The private detention basins shall be required to be
regularly maintained by the subdivision's homeowner's association per a
Town approved drainage maintenance plan.
12.The developer shall construct off -site drainage improvements along Owl Vista
Place, as agreed to by the developer in coordination with the surrounding
neighbors. Construction of the Owl Vista Place improvements are to be
completed prior to the subdivision's public opening for home sales.
Improvements required within flood prone areas shall include:
a. Replacing existing culvert crossings with larger capacity culverts
b. Raising the elevation of the drive and armoring the drive
embankment(s) for erosion protection where required so as to have the
effect of providing all-weather access along the private drive.
c. Redirecting existing stormwater drainage to be conveyed back into
historical, concentrated crossing locations along Owl Vista Place.
13.A private drainage and maintenance easement shall be dedicated per the
Final Plat for an area along the project's southern property line, adjacent to
Owl Vista Place. The easement shall be granted to the owners of the
properties along Owl Vista Place for ongoing maintenance of drainageways,
conveyance structures, and erosion protection.
14. The proposed development shall not increase pre-existing storm water flows
within the FEMA floodplain exiting the property along the western boundary.
15.The large Saguaro Cactus with multiple arms, located along Shannon Road
and across from Sahuaro Divide, shall be preserved in place.
OQOJP\yEY Aq�0+1
"'OuMDED 191�
Town of Oro Valley
Community Development and Public Works
October 6, 2017
Paul Oland
WLB Group
4444 E. Broadway
Tucson, Arizona 85711
Re: OV1701617, Rezoning request for a proposed residential subdivision located on the
east side of Shannon Road between Lambert Lane and Naranja Drive
(2"d Submittal)
Permitting Engineering review has determined that the previous engineering review comments
have been addressed. However, in accordance to the plan process, additional Engineering
comments may be forthcoming, as deemed applicable by the Town.
If you have any questions, please call me at (520) 229-4824.
SincerelyZ',E.
Esteban
Senior Civil Engineer
Oro Valley, it's in our nature.
11000 N. La Canada Drive, Oro Valley, Arizona 85737
www.orovalleyaz.gov I phone: (520) 229-4800 1 fax: (520) 742-1022
' NOTICE FORM CHECKLIST
OV Number: O �/jI-70 I 0-7Z a QVI 7 0
Meeting Name & Date:
Application Type: 6 PA
15-day�ot� PIDEADLINE:
- -ADS
Publish in Daily Territorial? Ye No Day of Publishing: MT"W !q' 1I - q ) 3
2pm submission deadline: —� Date/Time emailed: a�% a'yV-%
il
Publishing #: %1,�gCost:
Paper copy (attached): X Scanned to OV file:
Affidavit scanned to OV file:
HOA Notification? No
HOAs:
Original to Town Clerk
All Affected Total:
Date mailed out:
Notification Boundary? Yes No
Notification radius: feet Spreadsheet into file: n 3
Total residents: 1 Z��'
1 - - �SDate mailed out: "lLg I -7
Property Posting? (,Yes) No
Posting on Town property? Yes No
Post on Planning Page? Yes No
P
Notes:
Stickers given to Planner: r 64 L
Date posted:
Date posted:
Vl -760/ 1D�
o�rOF
l
� A
Town of Oro Valley
Community Development and Public Works
The Planning and Zoning Commission invites the community to attend a public hearing
on
Tuesday, October 3, 2017, 6:00 p.m
Icagen, Inc., 2090 E. Innovation Park Drive
PUBLIC HEARING: Shannon Road General Plan Amendment and Rezoning for a
76-acre property, located on the east side of Shannon Road, immediately south of
Ironwood Ridge High School. The requests seek to change the existing development
rights on the property as follows:
1. General Plan Amendment FROM Rural Low Density Residential TO Low Density
Residential-1 (OV1701072).
2. Rezoning FROM large -lot residential, R1-144 TO small -lot cluster residential, R1-36
(OV1701617).
QUESTIONS? Please contact Planner Milini Simms at 520-229-4836 or
msimms@orovalleyaz.gov.
For more information, go to OVprojects.com under the project name:
Shannon Road General Plan Amendment and Rezoning
Posted: 9/8/2017
Time: 5:00 p.m.
By: jma
Oro Valley, it's in our nature.
11000 N. La Canada Drive, Oro Valley, Arizona 85737
www.orovalleyaz.gov I phone: (520) 229-4800 1 fax: (520) 742-1022
' wj :
SEPTEMBER 11, 2017- 19
parental rights based upon the record and the
ocladc a.m. at the Pima County Courts Build-
a.m. at the Plena County Superior Court,
case manager is Stephanie Badilla and maybe.
Publication hearing on
evidence presented to the Court.
ing,110 West Congress, Tucson, Arizona in
2225 East Ajo Way, Tucson, Arizona 95713.
reached by telephone at 520-2094M&
mbe 2017, at 10 a m .
5. ffyou are receiving this Notice by publica-
'Division 64, the Honorable Julia K. Connors
before Judge Pennington for the purpose of
S. Requests for reasonable accommodation
upe&r Court, 2225 E. -
tion, you may obtain a copy of the Motion
Presiding. This is an [z] appearance hearing.
determining whether any parent or guardian
for persona with disabil must be made
zona 85713. before the
for Termination of Parent -Child Relationship
DATEM 8/9117It/ Petitioner or Petitioner's
named herein is contesting the allegations in
to the court by parties at least three Work-
isWU for the purpose
and Notice of Hearing by submitting a
Attorney
the Petition.
ing days in advance of a scheduled court t
ur any parent named
written request to. KATHRYN M. MARTIN,
WARNING: This is a legal notice; your rights
2. You and your children are entitled to have
proceeding and an be made by tailing (520) 1
he allegations in the
Office ofthe Attorney General. 4211 S.
may be affected. Este es on aviso legal Sus
an anotneypresent at the hearing. You may
740-2000.
Santa Rita Ave., Tucson, Arizona 85714.
derechos poddan ser afectados.If you object
hire your own attorney or, ifyou cannot
DATED this _ day of August, 2017.
(arc entitled to have an
The assigned child safety worker is Annette
to any part of this petition or motion that ac-
afford an attorney and want to be represented
MARK BRNOVICH AttorneyGeneral
Ie heating. You may hire
Brass, and maybe reached by telephone at
companies this notice, you must file with the
by an attorney, one maybe appointed by
Darktr M. Cortina AsdateotAttosney - -
i If you cannot afford an
520-407-2904.
court a written objection describing the legal
the Court. - - -
General
be represented by an at-
tl Requests for reasonable accommodation
basis for your objection at least three days
3. You have a right to appear as a party in
PUBLISH: TiseDallyTenitorisl I
=pointed by the Court.
for persona with disslinities must be made
before the hearing date or you must appear in
this proceeding. You are advised that your
Aug. 21, 28, Sept 5,11, 2017
appear as a party in this ,
to the court by parties at least three work-
person or through an attorney at the time and
failure to personally appear in court at the
}
advised that your failure
ing days in advance of a scheduled court
place set forth in the notice of hearing,
initial hearing, pretrial conf rence, settlement
NOTICE OP HEARING f
In court at the initial
proceeding and can be made by calling (520)
PUBLISH:'Ihe Daffy Territorial
conference or dependency adjudication,
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE ;
iermce, status confer-
724.2000.
Aug.28, SepL 5,11, 2017
without good ease shown, may result in
STATE OF ARIZONA j
fdjudicatlon, without
7. You have the dot to make a request or
a finding that you have waived your legal
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PIMA j
;ayresult in a finding
motion prior to any hearing that the hearing
NOTICE OF HEARING
rights and have admitted the allegations in
In the Matter ok NUNEZ, GABRIEL
your legal rights and
be closed to the public.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
the Petition. In addition, if you fail to appear;
ADRIAN d.o1%12/09/10
egations In the Motion.
DATED this _ day of August 7017.
STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE
without good cause, the hearing may go
Person(s) under 18 years of age. No,
t to appear without good
MARK BRNOVICH Attorney General
COUNTY OF PIMA
forward in your absence and may result in an
ID20170440 -�
ry go forward in youzab-
KATHRYN M. MARTINAssistant Attorney
In the matter of PENA, JASSLYNN JANETH
adjudication of dependency, termination of
DC.S'S NOTICE OF PUBLICATION HEAR
in termination of your
General
MENDOZA d ob.12/11/2014 PENA. YAJ-
your parental rob or the establishment of a
ING ON DEPENDENCY PETITION
upon the record and the
PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial
AIRA JISSELL MENDOZA dab. 01/26/2016
permanent guardianship based upon the it-
(The Hmiorabk Alyce L Pennington)
i the Court
Aug. 28, Sept S. 11, 18,2017
Person(s) under 18 years of age. No.
cord and the evidence presented to the Court
TO: JASMINE NIICOLE GREEN, parent and/
this Notice by publia-
JD20170424 DCS'S NOTICE OF PUBLICA-
as well as an order of paternity, custody, or
or guardian ofthe above -named child.
a copy of the Motion
NOTICE OP BEARING
TION HEARING ON DEPENDENCY PETI-
change of custody in a consolidated family
1. The Department of Child Safety, (DO:
Trent -Child Relationship
Linda A Bell 58M B Edwin Rd Tucson
TION (The Honorable Alyce Pennington)
law matter and an order for child support if
or the Department), by and through ' - ]
g by submitting a writ-
Arizona 85739 Representing [z] Self
TO: Jeanette margarita Mendoza, Pwro Hen-
paternity has been established.
undersigned cou" has Bed s Dependency
S. CHAPMAN, Office of
ARIZONA SUPERIOR COURT, PIMA
army Pena and John Doe (a fictitious name).
4- If you are receiving this Notice by
Petition pursuant to Title 8, ofthe Arizona
l. 4211 S. Santa Rita Ave,
COUNTY
parents of the above -named children.
publication, you may obtain a copy ofthe
Revised Statotea, Rules 4.1 and 42 ofthe ,
14. The assigned child
In the Muter of the Estate o@ Audrey J. Mer-
The Department of Child Safety (DCS or the
Dependency Petition. Nodes of Hearing, and
Arizona Rules of CM Procedure; and Rule
Walker, and maybe
runs- Date of Birth: 03.02-1937 Deceased
Department), by and through undersigned
Temporary Order by submitting a written
48(D) of the Arzona Ruks of Procedure for ,
i at 520-209-3509.
NO. PB20170349 NOTICE OF HEARING
counsel, has filed a Dependency Petition
request to: Darlene hL Cortina; Office of the
the JuymEe Court
oabk accommoda-_
NOTICE IS GIVEN that the Court will
pursuant to Title 8. of the Arizona Revised
Attorney General, 4211 South Santa Rita Av-
2. The Court has set a Publication hearing on j
Idinebilities must be
consider the Febtionds Petition For Formal
Statues, and Rule 48 of the Rules of Procedure
coup, Tucson, Arizona 85714. The assigned
the 21at day of November, 2017 at 1:30 p m, at i
parties at least three
Probate of Will and Appointment of Personal
for the Juvenile Court
nice of a scheduled
Representative copy of which is attached
1. The Court has set a Publication hearing
I an be made by ailing
hereto. on September 25, 2017, at 10.00
on the 2nd day of Novembe . 2017 or 9.00
The Planning and Zoning Commission Invites the community to attend a
_
' public hearing on
i
to make a request or
tearing that the hearing
ic.
y of August 2017.
;Attontey General
(Assistant Attorney
ITerritorial
2,2017
NG
COURT OF THE
}.OUNTY OF PIMA'..
MERO TEMPLE- - ..
TELdob.12/05/11
YA JASMIN dab.
finder 18 yearsof age. No.
40TICF OF HEARING
TERMINATION OF
31ATIONSH M (PUBLi-
}e Jennifer P. Langford)
fictitious name, parent of
Ildren.
dCbild Safety, (DCS or
;and thmugh
I has fried a Motion for
of -Child Relationship
rhonsArizona
iolesoRevised statutes The Planningand Zoning Commission Invites the community to attend a
rizona Rules of Pence- 9 tY
a Publication hearing
lovember, 2017, at 10A0
natty Superior Court,
cson, Arizona 85713.
e Jennifer R Langford for
mining whether any par
-
contesting the allepd—
oren are entitled to have
at the heart* You may
ley o; ifyou cannot
id want to be represented
stay be appointed by
0 appear as a party 3n this
t advised that your failure
in court at the initial
dunce, status confer-
1 adjudication, without
ry resultl a finding
our Legal rights and
legations in the Motion.
in to appear without good .
Tay go forward in your ab-
in termination of your
Tuesday, October 3, 2017, 6:00 PM
Icagen, Inc., 2090 E. Innovation Park Drive 1
PUBLIC HEARING: Innovation Park Drive General Plan Amend- I
ment for a 15-acre property, located at the northwest comer of Rancho
Vistoso Blvd. and Vistoso Commerce Loop. d
The request seeks to change the existing land use on the prop-
erty FROM Commerce/Office Park TO Medium Density Residential
(OV1701076).
QUESTIONS? Please contact Long Range Principal Planner Elisa
Hamblin at 520-229-4847 or ehamblin63orovalleyazgov
For more information, go to OVprojects.com under the project name:
Innovation Park Drive General Plan Amendment
7
childr entitled
SEPTEMBER 14.2017
3uled court
rights based upon the record and evidence
hire your own attorney o, if you cannot
General
initial hearing, pretrial conference, settlement
Eing (520).
presented
afford an attorney and want to be represented
PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial:......
conference or dependenryadjudiation,...
Dated: August 28. 2017 /sl Julia K. Palfrey- - -
by anattorney, one maybe appointed by
Aug. 29, Sept. 5,12,19, 2017 .- _
without good cause shown, may result in • - -
r Ervin
man, Esq. Attorney for Petitioner
the Court.
a finding that you have waived your legal _
y HAND
PUBLISH; The Daily Territorial
4. You have a right to appear as a party in this
NOTICE Op HEARING
rights and have admitted the allegations in
017 SUPE-
• SepL 12,19, 26, Oct. 3, 2017 '_
- proceeding, You are advised that your failure -
- IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE - -- -
the Petition. In addition, if you fail to appear, "
to personally appear in court at the initial
STATE OF ARIZONA
without good cause, the hearing may go
NOTICE OF HEARING
hearing, pretrial conference, status confer
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PIMA
forward in your absence and may result in an
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
ence, or termination adjudication, without
In the matter of: TORO, NINA MARIE
adjudication of dependency, termination of,
STATE OF ARIZONA -
good cause shown, may result in a fording
d o b.12/09/11 TORO, LAYLA JANINE
your parental rights or the establishment of a
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PIMA
that you have waived your legal rights and
dab. 02/12/14 Person(s) under 18 years
permanent guardianship based upon the re -
rite 303,
In the matter of MALLOY, EVANGELINE -
have admitted the allegations in the Motion.
of age. No. ID20338l Reactivated DCS'S
cord and the evidence presented to the Court,
1802 Fan
FAUSTINA dab.07/08/OS CUETO, FELIX-
In addition, if you fail to appear without good
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION HEARING ON
as well as an order ofpatemity, custody, or
&drew
CIANO DANIEL do b. 07/05/07 CUETO,
cause, the hearing may go forward in your ab-
DEPENDENCY PETITION (The Honorable
change of custody in a consolidated family
for Peti-
MEKAYELIA MARIE dab. 06/02/10
Bence and may result in termination of your
Patricia Green)
lawmatter and an order for child support if
Persons under 18 years of age. No. JD192448
parental rights based upon the record and the
TO. ELDON SYE TORO, parent and/or
paternity has been established
rHE
DCS'S NOTICE OF PUBLICATION HEAR
evidence presented to the Court.
guardian of the above -named child
4. Ifyou are receiving this Notice by
IR TIDI
ING ON MOTION FOR TERMINATION
5. If you are receiving this Notice by publica.
The Department of Child Safety (DCS or the
publication, you may obtain a copy of the
XVISION
OF PARENT -CHILD RELATIONSHIP (The
tion, you may obtain a copy of the Motion
Department), by and through undersigned
Dependency Petition, Notice of Hearing, and
'HONY
Honorable Susan A. Kettlewell) .
far Termination of Parent -Child Relationship
counsel, has fried a Dependency Petition
Temporary Order by submitting a written
) Minors
TO: FREDERICK JACKSON A.K.A.
and Notice of Hearing by submitting a
pursuant to Title 8. of the Arizona Revised
request to: RANDI E. ALEXANDER. Office �=
PUBLI-
FREDERICK O. JACKSON, III, patent of the
written request to: Loretta A. Jaquet, Office
Statues, and Rule 48 of the Rules of Procedure
of the Attorney General. 4211 S Santa Rita
N FOR
above -named children.
of the Attorney General. - 4211 S. Santa
for the Juvenile Court
Avenue, Tucson, Arizona 85714. The as-
HILD -
1. The Department of Child Safety, (DCS or
Rita Avenue. Tucson. Arizona 85714. The
1. The Court has set a Publication hearing
signed case manager Is Isela Leon and may be
the Department), by and through
assigned child safety worker is T'eresita
on November 17, 2017 at 10.00 a.m. at the
reached by telephone at (520) 6384772.
parent of
undersigned counsel, has filed a Motion for
Fragoso and may be reached by telephone at
Pima County Superior Court, 2225 East Ajo
S. Requests for reasonable accommodation -
Termination of Parent -Child Relationship
520-2094839.
Way, Tucson. Arizona 85713, before Judge .
for persons with disabilities must be made
kndigo, by _'
under Title 8, of the Arizona Revised Statutes
6. Requests for reasonable accommoda-
Patricia Green for the purpose of determining
.'
to the court by parties at least three work- ,
, has filed
and Rule 64 of the Arizona Rules of Proce-
tion for persons with disabilities must be
whether any parer or guardian named herein
ing clays in advance of a scheduled court
it -Child
dure for the Juvenile Court. - ..
made to the court by parties at least three
is contesting the allegations in the Petition.
proceeding and can be made by calling (520)
he Arizona
2. The Court has set a Publication Sever.
working days in advance of a scheduled
2. You and your child are entitled to have an
740-2000,
e Arizona
ance hearing on the 13th day of Novem-
court proceeding and an be made by ailing
allomey present at the hearing. You may hire
DATED this 24th day of August, 2017.
m Court.
her, 2017, at 8:30 am. at the Pima County
520-724-2000.
)our own attorney or, if you cannot afford an
MARK BRNOVICI I Attorney General
3ctobcr 26,
Superior Court, Pima County Juvenile Court,
7. You have the right to make a request or
attorney and want to be represented by an at-
RANDI E. ALEXANDER Assistant Attorney
my Supe-
2225 East Ajo Way, Tucson, Arizona 85713,
motion prior to any hearing that the hearing
tomey; one may be appointed by the Court.
General
in, Arizona
before the Honorable Susan A. Kettlewell for
be closed to the public.
3. You harm: a right to appear as a party in
PUBLLSII The DailyTerrhodat
t Deborah
the purpose of determining whether any par.
DATED this 18th day of August, 2017.
this proceeding. You are addled that your
Aug. 29, Sept. 5,12,19, 2017
ring
ent or guardian named herein is contesting
MARK BRNOVICI I Attorney General
Eailtmre to personally appear in court at the
e contest-
the allegations in the Motion.
3 You and to have
LORENA A. JAQUEf Assistant Attorney
your en are
:o have an an attomeypresent at the hearing. You may
u may We
n afford
anted by
Ibythe
adY In
oat your -
rt at the
, status
action,
a finding
tins and
a Motion.
ithout good
I in your ab-
m of your
ord and the
T publica-
Motion
relationship
ng RPM
nucon,
nodation
be made
e work-
court
tiling (520)
luest or
he hearing
ty in this
dation for
nade to the
a assigned
efore your
t the Initial
the Status
ijudia-
order
tottshyp of
trltmg,
rencc or
without
g that the
tau has
to have
me absence
ustodian
ofpsrental
The Planning and Zoning Commission Invites the community to attend a
public hearing on
Tuesday, October 3, 2017 6:00 p.m. '
leagen, Inc. 2090 E. innovation Park Drive
PUBLIC HEARING: Tangerine - State Land General Plan Amend-
ment presentation and discussion regarding a State of Arizona owned
property comprising approximately 302-acres located at the northwest
intersection of W. Tangerine Road and N. Coyote Crossing Trail and
bordered by W. Moore Road and N.Thornydale Road. The purpose of
the request Is to extend the General Plan Planning Boundary and add
a land use designation of Master Planned Community. The Amendment
does not include a potential annexation of the property or ownership
change of the State land (OV1701699).
QUESTIONS? Please contact Constituent Services Coordinator Jessica
Hynd at 520-229-4711 orjhynd@orovalloyaz.gov.
For more Information, go to OVprojects.com under the project name:
Tangerine -State Land General Plan Amendment
The Planning and Zoning Commission invites the community to attend a
public hearing on
Tuesday, October 3, 2017, 6:00 p.m
Icapen, Inc., 2090 E. Innovation Park Drive
PUBLIC HEARING: Shannon Road General Plan Amendment and
Rezoning for a 76-acre property, located on the east side of Shannon
Road, immediately south of Ironwood Ridge High School. The requests
seek to change the existing development rights on the property as fol-
lows: .
1. General Plan Amendment FROM Rural Low Density Residential TO
Low Density Residential-1 (OV1701072).
2. Rezoning FROM large -lot residential, Rl-144 TO small -lot cluster
residential, R1-36 (OV1701617).
QUESTIONS? Please contact Planner Milini Simms at 520-229-4836 or
msimms@orovalloyaz.gov.
For more information, go to OVprojects.com under the project name:
Shannon Road General Plan Amendment and Rezoning
The Planning and Zoning Commission Invites the community to attend a
public hearing on
Tuesday, October 3, 2017, 6:00 p.m. _
Icagen, Inc., 2090 E. Innovation Park Drive
PUBLIC HEARING: Big Wash General Plan Amendment and Rezon
Ing presentation and discussion for approximately 108-acres located
north of Tangerine Road, between the future Moore Road loop on the
west and Rancho Vistoso Boulevard on the east The requests seek to
change the existing development rights on the property as follows:
1. General Plan Amendment FROM Open Space, Park, Resort/Golf
Course, and Medium Density Residential TO Open Space, Park,
Medium Density Residential and Medium High Density Residential
(OV1701068).
2. Rezoning FROM Open Space, Recreation Area/Golf Course, Medium
High Density Residential, Commercial (C-1) TO Open Space, Medium
Density Residential, and Medium High Density Residential (OV1701630).
QUESTIONS? Please contact Senior Planner, Roseveit Areilano at 52D-
229-4817 or mrellano@orovaileyaz.gov.
For more information, go to OVprojects.com under the project name:
Big Wash General Plan and Planned Area Development (PAD)
Amendments
www.dailyt i orial..Com
alleptioas in the Petition.
2. Yoaaodyata cht7dren ate -tf tled to have
an attorney Ptesematthe hearim You may
him your own attorney oL if ym csenot
atEtedan attomeyandwautto be mpnwated
o --ybcby the C
3..You have aright to appearmaparty in tbia
Pmaeeding. Youamadv}aedthatyonrfa&m
to FmomBy appear iamart at the initial
hearing, prettW coeferma, staRns coa6erea¢
xdepmdeocy-Vudiatkw wWxxd®noel
ceuaaahown.mayawdtinafindingthat
s}msh�cwairadyoackgalcightsaadhve
admitkdtheallegetiomintluPetition. In
aA,E ioa,If yonf & to appeacwithout good
cuurg the hearing mygoforward inyour
.
absent andmayreadsisaoadjadi"u=
do" ortbe ItufaPerarstient
gaaodf4mhip baxd upon the record.aodthe
evidence pramtedto the Cow%as wdlaa
an order of paternity: assb* or change of
custody in awnsolida..d family law matter
and an order for chili support if paternity has
been enatt;_t d
4, If Von are receiving this Notice by
puhliwtion,you, may obtain acopy of the
Dependency Pebtil-.Notwe ofacartog and
Temporaty Order byauhmiuing a writdm
request to Amy ampman.Olficce of the
Attorney General. 4211 S. Sim" RIM Am_
Ttucsoo.Arizooa 85714. Tbt assigned ,,,
taaaegeris jeaTcRasf andmr be reached by
te4hootit510-204-4733-
5. Regtusts for reasonable acconumoda-
don forpesons with diaabiiitira must be
made to the court by parties atimt.three
—king days in advance of asdxtmled
court procee&*and anbemade by calling.
52D`724-29M
6. You have the rigid to make a requator
motlonpdor to any hearing that the hearing
be closed to the pubhe
DATED this 23thday ofAupst:2017- -
MARK BRNOVICH
AMYS.CHAPMAN
Assatant Attorney General. .
PUBLISH_The Daily Terntarid
AU& 30, Srpt..6.13, ZO, Z017
NOTICE OF HEARING
IN THESUERIOR COURT OF THE
JTATEOFARIZ.ONA
1'4 AND FORTIIR C0UIlTY OF PI%Lt
In the Mattes oS.LOPE4 DAVID ANTONIO
d LOS/1112015
Persons) under 18 years of a6c. No. jD
20170299
DOSS NOTICE OF HEARLNG ON DEPE.Y-
DENCYPETfTION
(PUBLISHED)
(Ironorabk kale jolmsoa)
TO: FRANCSCO DOE'JO13N DOE. a
ficthious name. rarenu of the abrn'e-namcd
Chu
The Departracid of CbW Safety (DCS or the
Departaunt) basfiled a Dependency Petltba
pursuant to Title 8, of the Arizona &-Asa
Statue, and Rule 48 of the Arizona Rules of
Procedure for the Juvenile Gaut
1.TheCourt LusctaPublicatioaHaring for
Me 16th day of Odober. 2017. at 11:30 am.
to be hcld at the Pima County Superior Court
atZ2 2.5 E Aja etay,Tucsa•4 Arizuaa S5,13.
before the Honorable 1 ec i jd� le_ the
Pu paw of.' tcrmm; ;g whethrr any rare-1
or suardfaa n_.-x d h=!n is Qa=i ^o the
aL'cgii,-in the Peti:iaa.
2. Ye as tyaur c:ualren arc e:,ra:cal to L: v
Tha Planning and Zoning Commission invites the ccrmm"ty to a :end a
. pubic.- hearing on
Tuesday, October 3, 2017 6:00 p-m-'
kagen, Inc. 2090 E. Innovation Park Drive
PUBLIC HEARING:Tangertne - State Land Genarat Plan Amand-
ment presentation and discussion regarding a Stara of Arizona owned
property comprising approximately 302 acres located at the northwest
intersection of W. Tangerine Road and N. Coyote Crossing Trait and
bordered by W. Moore Road and N. Thomydals Road -The purpose of
the requestia to extend the General Plan Planning Boundary and add
a land use designation of Master Planned Community. The Amendment
does not include a potential annexation of the property or ownership
change of the State land (OV1701699).
QUESTIONS? Please contact Constituent Services Coordinator Jessica
Hynd at 520-229-4711 or jhynd®omva11eya7_gov
,For morn information, go to OVprojects.com under the projectname.
Tengedna-State Land General. Plan Amendment
The Planning and Zoning Commission invites the community to attard a
public hearing on
Tuesday, October 3, 2017, 6:00 p m
Icagerl, Inc., 2090 E. h=vation Park Drive
PUBLIC HEARING_ Shannon Road General Plan Amendment and
Reacting for, a 76-acre property, located on the ea3t dde'of Shannon
Road, immediately south of Ironwood Ridge High School.The requests
seek to change the existing development rights on the property as fel-
lows
1. Generai.Plan Amendment FROM Rural Low Density Residential TO
Low Density Residental-1 (OV1701072).
2. Rezoning FROfit large4at residential, RI-144 TO small4ot cluster
residential, RI-36 ((:YV1701617).
QUEST1101W Please contact Planner MOW Simms at 520-229-4836 or
msimms®orovalleyazrgov.
For more information, go to OVprojects com under the project name:
Shannon Road General Plan Amendment and Rezoning
-111:iL[C
►[itlT[NES
SRgEMBER 13120171
anaitamgpresentatthe hearing Youmay
52D-77A-2900-
IOUJIM-tIbIdTWIWili@
hire your am attorney or. ifymaumt
6.Yon Ism the rot tomakearequest or
admiloedthe ha tb4
affordmattomryandwaottoberepnunted
modonpriaztioauyheadngthat the hearing F: addYim`lfyaufditQ:aFpn,�
by and-ney;aneMay heappoimedby-
the Court.
be closed to thepablia
a ataCthehetde�mganfioel
3- Ym bave a d& to appcw as aputy in this
proaedirg Youareadviseddutpurfi bum
DATED this 2sthday ofAugus4201Z
MARKBYNOVICiI
Attorney General
tthaeooetmdm►re�itiaaa!
o[dapaodtoeytte a
s , X%bb ottheab6Wi®meq
topmonaltyappear incourt atthe ldtid
ERICAAFORSCH
a:, garu htaatrtpmthel
1190—&l coafa'mx,statocor6ra=
AssstaatAttomryGeneral
C%ldmceptmmtedtatheCaj
ordepmdeayadjudicatian.witlsoutguoa
PUBLTSiLUeDagyTemtarial
x. asaderaEpi astaod
care ebaaw.may rmkinafinding that
Aug. 30. Sept. 613,20.2017
cwd*jWamaaoBdreadlim
you base wwlssdlour legdrights andbata
asdaaaNaford�ilda
admittmthealleptimsintbeperuk'n..a
NOTICE OF HEARING
:additim.ifyoufail toarpeaewithoutpod
INTHESL'PERIOSCOL=0FnM
cause.the luearingmay gofurwardinyatr
STATEOFARIZWLk
abscaaandnixymu:tiaaua.iju3LatLut
IN AND FORTHE COLN rY OF PUM,
a f delcrideng, trm in'thl"ufyourgareaul.
httheAlatterof.RAMtttt7Ft?VRAY
E
10�
righMorthe & tit ti� cnzofapermaaaot.
dwh0111312016
guardiaas':.r baxd upon the record and the
Ferwu(s) under 13 yeas of age. No. )D
evidcate pmsented to the Cant, as well as
20170448
1
an order of paternity; custody, or clatsge of
DCS'S NOTICE OF PUBUCAUON HEAR-
custody in a cunsohil ed fan* law matter
andanordcrfordiidaTpurtifpaternitphas
ING ON DEPE.NDE\CY PEr=j4
MicHoccrableDeiinfiristoffr!)
1
been estot.R,t,..t
TO- JOWN DOE, parmi of the abam-naina
j
4.Ifyou are recelsingthis Notice by
chil&
j
puhlisatiun, youmay obtain a [ropy of the
I. The Department of Chili Siddy (DCS or
DepmdencyPctit:on,tictisoflleadng,
the Dcpa==)hasa-_j
and TeotporaryOrderbystsbmdtiaga
Petition Pursuant tuTie3.ofthe Adr..ua
�
wrktca roquest to: EacaForsch, Ol%e of the
Rmised Statues, ar iRnk 45 of the Ari— -
♦ L �{ a
Attorney GencraL 42 11 S. Santa Rita Ave,
RulesafProc*L xf�the yuveciL-Cosa,
Z/i►!�K
TbOL44 Ariasna 85714. The assigned cam
-mamgerisDayMMX&T
2. Ut Coati az set a pubacuf=n Hta::,- oc
_
and may bereached
the Silt day of&nerhGZCl7,at930a,m.,
by tekyhunn at 5ZO-209-1733.
to be i c;.i a LLt P:cm Cuualy juveace Court.
_
,-„5LCHo
,
ti nforrRvratsfffor withabkacrc..aeadr
lion-forpezxws withd'.•M:.•t.Kmutbe
"AhleDanI
beS;rethrlioaurahltDrauC1:RNING
nun:e to t..e court by pat" at least ti;ree
pa prose of •iaemuxangwheiluer any
:
woai:- days inadraxcofaS;4_-4u's1
parcu
orpzdiarrnamedhc=1ecaot='ti::gL`e
i
I
rmut prateei:aa, a :! r..a I= r'W::. h;
EMNG NonCE _
Tha Planning and Zorn Ccmmisscn invites the c:carmunity, to a :ard a
PLAN AMENDIiENE
;
pt bi. c hearing on
ttttYiapttitiabee ttpaa;
tntci Cttetrthera, ttletana Mtadd{
Tuesday, October 3, 201T, 6:00 PM
°a't° antldar,twtik ing:l
Icagen, Inc., 2090 E. Innovation Park Drive
feadc PIM boundary j
Parcetddf®bac219-3&4a4Ci
PUBLIC HEARING: Innovation Park Drive General PianAnt;.nd-
d. ne Rood a (M
tatrter of Tattgetioe Road end G
cent for a 15-ar:re property, located
at the norti sea corner ci Rancid
SMRaope 13.Eaet .
Vistcso Bird. and Vlstcso Commerce Lccp
y a mktor• Gummal Plan atnerAnent
im Rural Detsi4r FtnWWM (RDRj
The recr est sacks to c' wry_ the exist rig land use on the prop-,t
enwtded tapeeihc p(trq
arty FROM Ccr--.•rarce:v,.xe Park TO Mtediunt Density Residential
aid GPA1708.00t
(OV1701Z�7 c).
Id
hem helots ltts irteot" C+uq
QUESTIONS? Please cc -act Long Rar,ae Principal Planner Elisa `
attar;[ Cyndit Roea,attto Tal
Hambi., iat52C-u�-;S47oreharnblinCorovalleyazgov.
For more information, go to OVpmjacts eom under the project name -
Innovation Park Drive General Plan Amendment
t
�..
The Planning and Zoning Commissicn invites the community to atlerxt a
pubtac hearing on
(X
i
Tuesday, October 3, 2017, 6.00 P.M.
a
_ �
Icagen, Inc., 2080 E innovation Park Drive
�
l� j
PUBLIC HEARING: Big Wash General Plan Amendment and Rezcn-
I i
r
Ing prasentatiort and discusslon for arpr xima:a!j 103-acres located
:
north of Tangerine Road, between the flu.•-e Moore Road loop on thei
west and Rancho Vistoso Boufavard on the casLThe requests seek th
ehanga the existing development rights on the property as foiicwrs:
y
t General Plan Amendment FROM Open Space Park Resort Ga#
Course, and Medium Density Residential TO Open Spate, Parkes
Medium Density Residential
'
and Medium High Density Residential
(OV1701068).
, c
2. Rezoning FROM Open Space, Recreation ArearGolf Cour.-e, t>editan
f
High Density Residential, Commercial (C-1) TO Open Space, Idedium,44
k �
Density Residential, and Medium High Density Residential (OV130 7016).:
�'
QUESTIONS? Please contact Senior Planner, Rosevelt Aretiano at 520-
pam d irie at ercom o
���6
229-4817 or rareilano0oroval IeYazgov
seitaatr caeread,lloalleeetrYaaetk
aMotfaa flonAresQitwj Oa areal
For more information, go to OVprojecta com under the project name:
PWL
Big Wash General Plan and Planned Area Development (PAD)
Amendments
Classifieds - Announcements - Legals I tucson.com
http://speedway.tucson.com/classifieds/?template=star&type=full&act
Classifieds -Announcements - Legals
Search the classifieds
Search
There are 6 ads in this category:
KTtWAFt'L't'I
The Planning and Zoning Commission invites the
community to attend a
publichearingon
Tuesday
October 3, 2017
6:00 PM
Icagen, Inc.
2090 E. Innovation Park Drive
PW�'�'t't't7
PUBLIC HEARING: Innovation Park Drive
General Plan Amendment
for a 15-acre property,
located at the northwest
corner of Rancho Vistoso Blvd. and Vistoso
Commerce Loop.
The request seeks to change the existing land use on the property FROM Commerce/Office Park TO
Medium
Density Residential (OV1701076).
QUESTIONS?
Please contact Long Range Principal Planner Elisa Hamblin at 520-229-4847 or
ehamblin@orovalleyaz.gov.
For more information, go to OVprojects.com under the project name: Innovation Park Drive
General Plan Amendment
Publish September 11,12 and 13, 2017
Arizona Daily Star
Ad #0008721730-01 [Permalink]
►�+► Via_, �. �1 h� c.�: ,
The Oro Valley Planning and Zoning Commission invites the community to attend
Classifieds - Announcements - Legals I tucson.com
http://speedway.tucson.com/classifieds/?template=star&type=full&act
a public hearing on
Tuesday
October 3, 2017
6:00 p.m.
Icagen, Inc.
2090 E. Innovation Park Drive
PUBLIC HEARING: Tangerine - State Land
General Plan Amendment
presentation and discussion regarding a State of Arizona owned property comprising approximately 302-
acres
located at the northwest
intersection of W. Tangerine Road and N. Coyote Crossing Trail and bordered by
W. Moore Road and
N. Thornydale Road. The
purpose of the request is
to extend the General Plan Planning Boundary and add a land use designation of
Master Planned Community. (OV1701699).
QUESTIONS?
Please contact Constituent Services Coordinator
Jessica Hynd at 520-229-4711 orjhynd@orovalleyaz.gov.
_r•14W-"�
For more information, go to OVprojects.com under the project name: Tangerine -State Land
General Plan Amendment
Publish September 11,12 and 13, 2017
Arizona Daily Star
Ad #0008721172-01 [Permalink]
VVVV✓fV V
The Oro Valley Planning
and Zoning Commission
invites the community to
attend a public hearing on
Tuesday
October 3, 2017
6:00 p.m.
Icagen, Inc. 2090 E. Innovation Park Drive
VVVVVV V
PUBLIC HEARING: Big Wash General Plan Amendment and Rezoning presentation and discussion for
approximately 108-acres
Classifieds - Announcements - Legals I tucson.com http://speedway.tucson.com/classifieds/?template=star&type=full&act
located north of Tangerine Road, between the future Moore Road loop on the
west and Rancho Vistoso
Boulevard on the east. The
requests seek to change the existing development rights on the property as follows:
1. General Plan Amendment FROM Open Space, Park,
Resort/Golf Course, and
Medium Density Residential TO Open Space, Park,
Medium Density Residential
and Medium High Density
Residential (OV1701068).
2. Rezoning FROM Open
Space, Recreation Area/
Golf Course, Medium High
Density Residential,
Commercial (C-1) TO Open
Space, Medium Density
Residential, and Medium
High Density Residential
(OV1701630).
QUESTIONS?
Please contact Senior
Planner, Rosevelt Arellano
at 520-229-4817 or rrellano@orovalleyaz.gov.
For more information, go to OVprojects.com under the project name: Big Wash General Plan and
Planned Area Development (PAD) Amendments
Publish September 11,12 and 13, 2017
Arizona Daily Star
Ad #0008721772-01 [Permalink]
■■■ ■a■a
The Oro Valley Planning
and Zoning Commission
invites the community to
attend a public hearing on
Tuesday
October 3, 2017
6:00 p.m
Icagen, Inc.
2090 E. Innovation Park Drive
M E M E N E E
PUBLIC HEARING: Shannon Road General Plan Amendment and Rezoning
for a 76-acre property,
located on the east side of Shannon Road, immediately south of Ironwood Ridge High School. The requests
Classifieds - Announcements - Legals I tucson.com http://speedway.tucson.com/classifieds/?template=star&type=full&act
seek to change the existing
development rights on the property as follows:
1. General Plan Amendment FROM Rural Low Density
Residential TO Low Density
Residential-1(OV1701072).
2. Rezoning FROM large -lot
residential, R1-144 TO
small -lot cluster
residential, R1-36
(OV1701617).
QUESTIONS?
Please contact Planner
Milini Simms at 520-229-4836 or msimms@orovalleyaz.gov.
-"r1tirr
For more information, go to OVprojects.com under
the project name: Shannon Road General Plan Amendment and Rezoning
Publish September 11,12 and 13, 2017
Arizona Daily Star
Ad #0008721901-01 [Permalink]
PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF
SOLICITATION FOR
QUALIFICATIONS:
Publish: Arizona Daily Star - August 25, and September 11, 2017
NOTICE OF SOLICITATION FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.270243
DESIGN ENGINEERING
FOR: SIGN INVENTORY AND PANEL REPLACEMENT
FEDERAL PROJECT NO.:
HSIP-PPM-0(264)D
ADOT TRACS NO.: T0146 03D
Pima County is seeking
Statements of Qualifications (SOQ) from qualified firms to provide Engineering
Consulting services for the
following project.
The design engineering
consultant will be responsible for all work and deliverables associated with a
comprehensive sign inventory for the procurement of
replacement sign panels for the Pima County Department of Transportation.
The scope of services involves inventorying all signs on
roadways owned by Pima County and preparing Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E) for the
procurement of replacement sign panels.
Classifieds - Announcements - Legals I tucson.com http://speedway.tucson.com/classifieds/?template=star&type=full&ac
Classifieds - Announcements - Legals
Search the classifieds
Search
There are 5 ads in this category:
TO
The Planning and Zoning Commission invites the
community to attend a
public hearing on
Tuesday
October 3, 2017
6:00 PM
Icagen, Inc.
2090 E. Innovation Park Drive
[WAFAF
PUBLIC HEARING: Innovation Park Drive
General Plan Amendment
for a 15-acre property,
located at the northwest
corner of Rancho Vistoso Blvd. and Vistoso
Commerce Loop.
The request seeks to change the existing land use on the property FROM Commerce/Office Park TO
Medium
Density Residential (OV1701076).
QUESTIONS?
Please contact Long Range Principal Planner Elisa Hamblin at 520-229-4847 or
ehamblin@orovalleyaz.gov.
For more information, go to OVprojects.com under the project name: Innovation Park Drive
General Plan Amendment
Publish September 11,12 and 13, 2017
Arizona Daily Star
Ad #0008721730-01 [Permalink]
Vlr VV 1/V V
The Oro Valley Planning
and Zoning Commission
Classifieds - Announcements - Legals I tucson.com http://speedway.tucson.com/classifieds/?template=star&type=full&ace
invites the community to
attend a public hearing on
Tuesday
October 3, 2017
6:00 p.m.
Icagen, Inc. 2090 E. Innovation Park Drive
V VO V V/ ✓ ✓ V0
PUBLIC HEARING: Big Wash General Plan Amendment and Rezoning presentation and discussion for
approximately 108-acres
located north of Tangerine Road, between the future Moore Road loop on the
west and Rancho Vistoso
Boulevard on the east. The
requests seek to change the existing development rights on the property as follows:
1. General Plan Amendment FROM Open Space, Park,
Resort/Golf Course, and
Medium Density Residential TO Open Space, Park,
Medium Density Residential
and Medium High Density
Residential (OV1701068).
2. Rezoning FROM Open
Space, Recreation Area/
Golf Course, Medium High
Density Residential,
Commercial (C-1) TO Open
Space, Medium Density
Residential, and Medium
High Density Residential
(OV1701630).
QUESTIONS?
Please contact Senior
Planner, Rosevelt Arellano
at 520-229-4817 or rrellano@orovalleyaz.gov.
�r �r
For more information, go to OVprojects.com under the project name: Big Wash General Plan and
Planned Area Development (PAD) Amendments
Publish September 11,12 and 13, 2017
Arizona Daily Star
Ad #0008721772-01 [Permalink]
The City of Tucson
is accepting comments on the draft FY 2017
Consolidated Annual
Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER). The report provides information on City
expenditures from July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017 for the following U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
Classifieds - Announcements - Legals I tucson.com http://speedwaytucson.com/classifieds/?template=star&type=full&act
entitlement grants:
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG); HOME
Investment Partnership (HOME); Emergency
Solutions Grant (ESG); and Housing Opportunities for Persons with Aids (HOPWA). This DRAFT report is
available for comment
beginning on Tuesday,
September 12, 2017 on the City's web site: http://www.tucsonaz.gov/hcd.
Comments will be accepted through September 27, 2017 at 5:00 PM and may be sent by email:
HCDComment@tucsonaz.gov
faxed to (520) 791-5407, or delivered to:
Housing and Community
Development Department, Attn: Leticia Carpio
310 Commerce Park Loop, Tucson, AZ 85745
El Gobierno de
la Ciudad de
Tucson solicita
comentarios
El Gobierno de la Ciudad de Tucson solicita comentarios y recomendaciones al Reporte Anual de
Rendimiento y Evaluaci6n del plan de Acci6n del siclo 2017. Este reporte preliminar proporciona
informaci6n acerca de los gastos realizados durante el periodo del fro de Julio del 2016 hasta el 30 de
Junio del 2017. Esta informaci6n pertinente de los fondos
proporcionados por el Departamento de Vivienda y Desarrollo Urbano de los
Estados Unidos en los
siguientes programas: Asistencia Financiera para Desarrollo Comunitario (CDBG por sus siglas in
ingles); Asociaci6n para la Inversi6n en Vivienda (HOME siglas en ingles); Asistencia Financiera para
Albergues de Emergencia (ESG siglas en
ingles); Asistencia Financiera para Desarrollo Comunitario (CDBG por sus siglas in
ingles); y Oportunidades de Vivienda para personas con SIDA (HOPWA, siglas
in ingles).
El reporte anual preliminar estara disponible al publico a partir del martes 12 de Septiembre del 2017 en
la pagina de Internet de la
Ciudad de Tucson. Lo
comentarios y
recomendaciones remitidos seran aceptados hasta el dia 27 de Septiembre del 2017
a las 5:00 p.m. Los
comentarios podran ser
remitidos via fax al
(520) 791-5407, en persona,
o por correo a:
Housing and Community
Development Department,
Attn: Leticia Carpio
310 Commerce Park Loop
Tucson, AZ 85745 HCDComment@tucsonaz.gov
Publish September 12, 2017
Arizona Daily Star
Classifieds - Announcements - Legals I tucson.com
http://speedway.tucson.com/classifieds/?template=star&type=full&act
Ad #0008722512-01 [Permalink]
'rye `!':�?•i<• 'hr ,�� ;�.
The Oro Valley Planning and Zoning Commission invites the community to attend
a public hearing on
Tuesday
October 3, 2017
6:00 p.m.
Icagen, Inc.
2090 E. Innovation Park Drive
�a•
PUBLIC HEARING: Tangerine - State Land
General Plan Amendment
presentation and discussion regarding a State of Arizona owned property comprising approximately 302-
acres
located at the northwest
intersection of W. Tangerine Road and N. Coyote Crossing Trail and bordered by
W. Moore Road and
N. Thornydale Road. The
purpose of the request is
to extend the General Plan Planning Boundary and add a land use designation of
Master Planned Community. (OV1701699).
QUESTIONS?
Please contact Constituent Services Coordinator
Jessica Hynd at 520-229-4711 orjhynd@orovalleyaz.gov.
-w-o"P"
For more information, go to OVprojects.com under the project name: Tangerine -State Land
General Plan Amendment
4 J_-&— 4b-4b-dh�
Publish September 11,12 and 13, 2017
Arizona Daily Star
Ad #0008721172-01 [Permalink]
ENN EWEN
The Oro Valley Planning
and Zoning Commission
invites the community to
attend a public hearing on
Tuesday
October 3, 2017
6:00 p.m
Classifieds - Announcements - Legals I tucson.com http://speedway.tucson.com/classifieds/?template=star&type=full&act
Icagen,Inc.
2090 E. Innovation Park Drive
E M E N E E N
PUBLIC HEARING: Shannon Road General Plan Amendment and Rezoning
for a 76-acre property,
located on the east side of Shannon Road, immediately south of Ironwood Ridge High School. The requests
seek to change the existing
development rights on the property as follows:
1. General Plan Amendment FROM Rural Low Density
Residential TO Low Density
Residential-1(OV1701072).
2. Rezoning FROM large -lot
residential, R1-144TO
small -lot cluster
residential, R1-36
(OV1701617).
QUESTIONS?
Please contact Planner
Milini Simms at 520-229-4836 or msimms@orovalleyaz.gov.
_r•1"r
For more information, go to OVprojects.com under
the project name: Shannon Road General Plan Amendment and Rezoning
Publish September 11,12 and 13, 2017
Arizona Daily Star
Ad #0008721901-01 [Permalink]
((Back to Classifieds - Announcements
((Back to Classifieds
Classifieds - Announcements - Legals tucson.com http://speedway.tucson.com/classifieds/?template=star&type=full&acl
AZ Da,lvl S�c�
Classifieds - Announcements - Legals
Search the classifieds
Search
There are 8 ads in this category:
EWAFAWAETM
The Planning and Zoning Commission invites the
community to attend a
publichearingon
Tuesday
October 3, 2017
6:00 PM
Icagen,Inc.
2090 E. Innovation Park Drive
PUBLIC HEARING: Innovation Park Drive
General Plan Amendment
for a 15-acre property,
located at the northwest
corner of Rancho Vistoso Blvd. and Vistoso
Commerce Loop.
The request seeks to change the existing land use on the property FROM Commerce/Office Park TO
Medium
Density Residential (OV1701076).
QUESTIONS?
Please contact Long Range Principal Planner Elisa Hamblin at 520-229-4847 or
ehamblin@orovalleyaz.gov.
For more information, go to OVprojects.com under the project name: Innovation Park Drive
General Plan Amendment
Publish September 11,12 and 13, 2017
Arizona Daily Star
Ad #0008721730-01 [Permalink]
The Oro Valley Planning and Zoning Commission invites the community to attend
Classifieds - Announcements - Legals tucson.com http://speedway.tucson.com/classifieds/?template=star&type=full&ac
a public hearing on
Tuesday
October 3, 2017
6:00 p.m.
Icagen, Inc.
2090 E. Innovation Park Drive
���� +,Y•.:. ��i�� �.�*ma's_
PUBLIC HEARING: Tangerine - State Land
General Plan Amendment
presentation and discussion regarding a State of Arizona owned property comprising approximately 302-
acres
located at the northwest
intersection of W. Tangerine Road and N. Coyote Crossing Trail and bordered by
W. Moore Road and
N. Thornydale Road. The
purpose of the request is
to extend the General Plan Planning Boundary and add a land use designation of
Master Planned Community. (OV1701699).
QUESTIONS?
Please contact Constituent Services Coordinator
Jessica Hynd at 520-229-4711 orjhynd@orovalleyaz.gov.
'"PlIV
For more information, go to OVprojects.com under the project name: Tangerine -State Land
General Plan Amendment
Publish September 11,12 and 13, 2017
Arizona Daily Star
Ad #0008721172-01 [Permalink]
M E N E W E E
The Oro Valley Planning
and Zoning Commission
invites the community to
attend a public hearing on
Tuesday
October 3, 2017
6:00 p.m
Icagen,Inc.
2090 E. Innovation Park Drive
PUBLIC HEARING: Shannon Road General Plan Amendment and Rezoning
Classifieds - Announcements - Legals I tucson.com http://speedway.tucson.com/classifieds/?template=star&type=full&ac
for a 76-acre property,
located on the east side of Shannon Road, immediately south of Ironwood Ridge High School. The requests
seek to change the existing
development rights on the property as follows:
1. General Plan Amendment FROM Rural Low Density
Residential TO Low Density
Residential-1(OV1701072).
2. Rezoning FROM large -lot
residential, R1-144TO
small -lot cluster
residential, R1-36
(OV1701617).
QUESTIONS?
Please contact Planner
Milini Simms at 520-229-4836 or msimms@orovalleyaz.gov.
-ir•�+Ir
For more information, go to OVprojects.com under
the project name: Shannon Road General Plan Amendment and Rezoning
Publish September 11,12 and 13, 2017
Arizona Daily Star
Ad #0008721901-01 [Permalink]
V V V V 1f Vr 1OO
The Oro Valley Planning
and Zoning Commission
invites the community to
attend a public hearing on
Tuesday
October 3, 2017
6:00 p.m.
Icagen, Inc. 2090 E. Innovation Park Drive
VVV✓✓V
PUBLIC HEARING: Big Wash General Plan Amendment and Rezoning presentation and discussion for
approximately 108-acres
located north of Tangerine Road, between the future Moore Road loop on the
west and Rancho Vistoso
Boulevard on the east. The
requests seek to change the existing development rights on the property as follows:
1. General Plan Amendment FROM Open Space, Park,
Resort/Golf Course, and
Medium Density Residential TO Open Space, Park,
Medium Density Residential
Classifieds - Announcements - Legals I tucson.com http://speedway.tucson.com/classifieds/?template=star&type=full&act
and Medium High Density
Residential (OV1701068).
2. Rezoning FROM Open
Space, Recreation Area/
Golf Course, Medium High
Density Residential,
Commercial (C-1) TO Open
Space, Medium Density
Residential, and Medium
High Density Residential
(OV1701630).
QUESTIONS?
Please contact Senior
Planner, Rosevelt Arellano
at 520-229-4817 or rarellano@orovalleyaz.gov.
For more information, go to OVprojects.com under the project name: Big Wash General Plan and
Planned Area Development (PAD) Amendments
Publish September 11,12 and 13, 2017
Arizona Daily Star
Ad #0008721772-01 [Permalink]
Susan Lynne Walka
5219 W. Grouse Way
Tucson, AZ 85742
520-730-9743
ARIZONA SUPERIOR COURT, PIMA COUNTY NO. NOTICE TO CREDITORS
(For Publication)
In the Matter of the Estate of:
Robert Edward Dick, Jr.
Date of Birth: 7-14-1947
Deceased
NOTICE IS GIVEN that Susan Lynne Walka has been appointed Personal Representative of this estate. All
persons having claims against the estate are required to present their claims within four (4) months after
the date of the first publication of this Notice or the claims will be forever barred. Claims must be
presented by delivering or mailing a written statement of the claim to the Personal Representative or
his/her attorney at the address listed below. DATED: 9/11/2017
Susan Lynne Walka Personal Representative
5219 W. Grouse Way
Tucson, AZ 85742
Publish September 13, 20 and 27, 2017
Arizona Daily Star
Ad #0008723136-01 [Permalink]
APC Towers, LLC
Prepared for: Prepared Bv:
Shannon 77 LLC
700 E Broadway Boulevard Suite 200
Tucson, AZ 85711
The WLB Group, Inc.
4444 East Broadway Blvd.
Tucson, Arizona 85711
Contact: Paul Oland
520.881.7480
gpoland@wlbgroup.com
WLB No. 116028-A-001
MMIX
TABLE OF CONTENTS
A. Project Summary............................................................................................................. 1
B. Property Data.................................................................................................................. 2
C. Your Voice, Our Future General Plan Amendment Criteria ............................................ 2
D. General Plan Policy Conformance.................................................................................... 6
Exhibits
• Location Map
• Existing General Plan Land Use Designations
• Proposed General Plan Land Use Designations
M��%� Shannon 80 — General Plan Amendment
IN" WLB No. 116028-A-001 0
A. Project Summary
The Town of Oro Valley is growing, not only in size but also in desirability. Since the year 2000,
the population of Oro Valley has increased roughly 45%, to over 43,500 residents (Source: 2015
American Community Survey). In addition, demand for housing is growing in the area. According
to Multiple Listing Service of Southern Arizona Statistics 2016 Year End Review, Tucson
experienced a total unit sales of 16,842 which is more units than have been sold in the last ten
years. Average list and sold prices for 2016 increased over the year 2015 while days on the
market saw a significant decrease from 2015. Furthermore, the number of building permits
pulled in Oro Valley have been steadily rising over the past three years signifying an increased
demand for housing. There were 176 permits pulled in 2016 up 15 from 2015 and up 42 from
2014. The Town of Oro Valley's recent economic and physical growth, as well as its need for
more housing, make our request a necessary and reasonable amendment to the "Your Voice, Our
Future" Oro Valley General Plan.
The subject property is located on the east side of Shannon Road between Lambert Lane and
Naranja Drive. The request is to modify the General Plan Land Use Designation from Rural Low -
Density Residential (R-LDR) to Low Density Residential 1 (LDR1, 0.4-1.2 DU/AC), to allow for a
single-family residential cluster subdivision.
The proposed change in land use designation and density is highly supported by several factors,
including:
• The Town of Oro Valley General Plan "Your Voice, Your Future" ratified by voters in
November 2016, has expanded the Town's Planning Area westward from Shannon to
Thornydale Road, signaling that this property is no longer on the fringe of the Town.
• The Urban Services Boundary has expanded west to Thornydale Road, positioning the
site away from the urban edge.
• The subject property is within a 1.5 mile proximity to two Tier 2 growth areas, located
at the intersections of Tangerine Road and La Cholla Boulevard, and Lambert Lane and
La Canada Drive.
• Naranja Drive road improvements have been made between Shannon Road and La
Cholla Boulevard.
• The changing transportation conditions of La Cholla Boulevard to a major north -south
corridor will increase the viability and accessibility of the site, creating demand for
medium density residential development.
• The adjoining Capella property to the east, is undergoing a rezoning from R144 to
Planned Area Development. Capella includes a mixture of uses and residential
densities from low density residential to high density residential, commercial areas,
recreation areas, and open space.
The requested change in land use designation will allow a residential cluster subdivision, with
large amounts of open space, and the preservation of Critical Resource Areas and Core Resource
Areas onsite. A significant open space buffer will be provided along the entire southern and
western boundaries to help mitigate any impacts created by this development. Additionally, this
��]� Shannon 80 — General Plan Amendment
ow_ nisi/ WLB No.116028-A-001
Plan Amendment is fully compliant with Oro Valley's Environmentally Sensitive Lands Ordinance
(ESLO). Under this Amendment, development of this property will result in approximately 66% of
the property being left in its natural condition.
In order to make this project a reality, the appropriate land entitlements must be acquired for
the property. The property owner is focused on acquiring the necessary entitlement in the Town
of Oro Valley and the first step in achieving the necessary land entitlements involves a Type 2
amendment to the Oro Valley General Plan. As such, this application for a Type 2 amendment is
being submitted.
B. Property Data
Location: The property is located immediately east of Shannon Road, south of Ironwood Ridge
High School, and north of Owl Vista Place, approximately one half mile west of La Cholla
Boulevard. The property can be described as the south half of the northwest quarter of Section
9, Township 12 South, Range 13 East.
Area of Properties/General Plan Amendment:
Parcel 224-21-0020: 9.8± Ac.
Parcel 224-21-0030: 9.8± Ac.
Parcel 224-21-0040: 18.3± Ac.
Parcel 224-21-0050: 38.5± Ac.
Total = 76.4± Ac.
Existing Land Uses: The site is currently vacant.
Existing Zoning: The property is currently zoned Single Family Residential District, 111-144.
Existing Oro Valley General Plan Designations: The property is designated as Rural Low Density
Residential (R-LDR).
Requested Oro Valley General Plan Designations: Low Density Residential 1 (LDR1, 0.4-1.2
DU/AC).
C. Your Voice, Our Future General Plan Amendment Criteria
In accordance with OVZCR Section 22.2.D.4 the General Plan amendment proposed shall, on
balance, be consistent with the vision, guiding principles, goals, and policies of the General Plan
as demonstrated by the following criteria. The request shall not:
1.a. Significantly alter existing development character and land use patterns without
adequate and appropriate buffers and graduated transitions in density and land use.
TyvryL�B Shannon 80 — General Plan Amendment
C��P� WLB No. 116028-A-001
• The development will include landscaping, architectural themes, and open space
treatments that comply with Oro Valley Code and Design Guidelines. This
development will contain landscape buffers around the entire perimeter of the
project and will provide a generous natural open space buffer for the lower density
neighborhood to the south and west. The project will also include significant
preservation of the onsite Critical Resource and Core Resource Areas. At minimum
95% of the Critical Resource Areas and 80% of the Core Resource areas will be
preserved in their natural condition on site. These areas along the southern and
western boundaries of the site will be permanently protected within a conservation
easement to be granted to the Town of Oro Valley. The proposed density is
approximately 1.0 homes per acre. In addition, the building height will be limited to
single -story for the entire development with a maximum of twenty-three (23') feet
height for gable roofed residences only to lessen the impact on views from the
surrounding neighborhood. This density is sensitive to the surrounding
developments, and will create a density transition between the lower density
developments to the south and west, and the higher intensity developments that are
being planned to the east. In addition, clustering development closer to the high
school is appropriate from a land use planning perspective.
1.b. Impact existing uses with increased infrastructure without appropriate improvements
to accommodate planned growth.
• With this development being on Shannon Road, an arterial roadway, much of the
utility infrastructure is already in place to accommodate this project. Sewer capacity
is available to serve this property. Sewer and any other necessary utility extensions
will be installed. Presently, water infrastructure is not in place to serve this parcel;
however, offsite infrastructure extensions of the Oro Valley Water system will be
made to serve this development. This development will have a net positive long-term
fiscal impact to the Town and its taxpayers. Given the recent extension of the urban
service boundary, the property lies well within the service limits of the Town and is in
a position to accommodate planned growth.
1.c. Impact other public services including police, fire, parks, water and drainage unless
careful analysis and explanation of anticipated impacts is provided to the Town.
• Being essentially infill, the location of this development and the proposed home sites
will not negatively impact public services such as police, fire and parks.
• Drainage will be carefully analyzed according to Town drainage design requirements.
Once developed, the site will have detention basins that will retain storm water runoff
and meter it out at less than pre -developed conditions. Additional onsite drainage
attenuation through larger basins will be completed to reduce the flow of existing run-
off. The following off -site drainage improvements will be implemented as agreed
upon with neighbors:
Shannon 80—General Plan Amendment
O1p WLB No. 116028-A-001
o Improvements along Owl Vista Place, which include larger culverts, armoring
the road, and raising the road in necessary areas.
o Working with Pima County to identify possible drainage improvements along
Saguaro Divide.
o Working with Amphitheater School District to identify possible drainage
improvements to Ironwood Ridge High School Property.
Capacity is available to serve the project site with water and sewer utilities. Additional
information on the type and amount of infrastructure extensions will be provided
during the platting process. According to the Traffic Impact Analysis findings, all
intersections adjacent to the subject property currently operate, and with the
addition of the project, are predicted to continue to experience an adequate level of
service for all movements on weekday and weekend peak hours. By clustering the
homes of this development in less environmentally significant areas, it will allow for
significant open space and buffering. There will be connectivity to the arterial road
network for emergency services and convenient access to nearby goods and services.
The subject property will have one access point that will connect this neighborhood
directly to Shannon Road, aligning with Sahuaro Divide. Both northbound and
southbound left -turn lanes at the project entrance (intersection of Shannon Road and
Sahuaro Divide) as well as a southbound left -turn lane at the intersection of Shannon
Road and Owl Vista Place will be installed to reflect the traffic analysis and agreement
with neighbors. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) has been provided as part of the
Rezoning Application.
1.d. Impact the natural beauty and environmental resources without suitable mitigation.
• Prior to development, this site will be inventoried for all significant vegetation. Town
of Oro Valley Native Plant Preservation ordinance requirements will be followed.
Flexible Design Options are being requested as part of the rezoning. A Native Plant
Preservation Waiver has been submitted but per the Zoning Code, the waiver does
not apply to significant ironwood trees or saguaro cacti within the developable area.
Plants that are suitable for transplanting will be transplanted on -site and be included
within the buffer yards and other open spaces of the site. The Critical Resource Areas
that run through the site will be preserved in their natural condition, except for
necessary roadway crossings. Both the Critical Resource Areas and the Core Resource
Areas will be preserved per ESOS Conservation Guidelines. The proposed residential
development will preserve surrounding views in the neighborhood through the use of
a natural bufferyard along the perimeter of the property and the preservation of
significant open space on the western portion of the site and the Core Resources Area
to the south.
2. Implement effective public outreach efforts to help identify neighborhood concerns and
respond by incorporating measure to avoid or minimize development impacts, and mitigate
unavoidable adverse impacts.
Shannon 80—General Plan Amendment
M " WLB No. 116028-A-001
• A Public Outreach Plan was developed and followed in accordance with Town
requirement. The first formal neighborhood meeting was held on April 25th, 2017, at
Casas Church. This meeting was held to increase public awareness of the proposal
and identify any initial concerns that surrounding neighborhoods may have with the
development of this property. The meeting was very productive and allowed
surrounding neighbors a chance to voice comments and suggestions, and any
questions answered.
• Some concerns raised during the neighborhood meeting were regarding:
o The density of the proposed development and the proposed number of lots
and the small lot size.
o The perceived loss of rural character within the neighborhood.
o The anticipated increase in traffic.
• In response to the above comments the following responses have been offered:
o A reduced density and reduced number of lots is being proposed. Lot size has
also increased in size from the previous proposal.
o The site will maintain a large amount of open space on the west and south of
the development in effort to preserve the views and rural character of the
area. We will work with neighbors to identify conservation methods.
o According to the Traffic Impact Analysis, all intersections adjacent to the
subject property currently operate and are predicted to continue to
experience an adequate level of service for all movements on weekday and
weekend peak hours. Both northbound and southbound left -turn lanes at the
project entrance (intersection of Shannon Road and Sahuaro Divide) as well as
a southbound left -turn lane at the intersection of Shannon Road and Owl Vista
Place will be installed to reflect the traffic analysis and agreement with
neighbors.
• A second formal neighborhood meeting was held on July 18th 2017, at Casas Church.
• An informal on -site tour was held on August 9, 2017 to better understand the layout
of the proposal. Survey poles with flags were set up to simulate the proposed building
heights and showed the proposed building envelope of the property. Residents
attended a guided tour to discuss the proposed development. At each checkpoint
discussions took place which addressed building heights, setbacks and drainage along
edges of the property. Residents who attended expressed their concerns related to:
o Drainage and ongoing damage to Owl Vista Place.
o Planning for on -site detention.
o Vehicular access and safety.
o Design of the homes.
o Location and design of the entry gate and sign.
o Preservation natural character of the project area.
As a result of the meetings held on July 18th 2017 and August 9, 2017 the following
agreements were made with neighbors:
o To mitigate for existing flooding issues an easement will be provided for
maintenance improvements to Owl Vista Place. Improvements along Owl
Shannon 80—General Plan Amendment
WLB No. 116028-A-001
Vista Place will include larger culverts, armoring the road, and raising the road
in flood prone areas.
o This development will attenuate pre-existing storm water flow rates by 15%-
25% by constructing larger than code -required onsite basins which are to be
landscaped within open space areas of the site.
o Both northbound and southbound left -turn lanes at the project entrance
(intersection of Shannon Road and Sahuaro Divide) as well as a southbound
left -turn lane at the intersection of Shannon Road and Owl Vista Place will be
installed to reflect the traffic analysis and agreement with neighbors.
o The design of homes will be compatible to the surrounding areas using natural
colors that blend with the desert landscape.
o The location and design of the entry gate will be compatible to the rural, desert
atmosphere of the area with a rustic western design and located a safe
distance from the Shannon Road right-of-way in order to prevent the back up
of traffic onto Shannon.
o Conservation of 96% of Critical Resource Areas, 97% of Core Resource Areas,
and 45% in the remaining Resource Management Area Tier 1. Preservation of
ESOS areas along the southern (300'-600') and western (300'-400') edges
which will be protected within an open space easement to be granted to the
Town.
• A third formal neighborhood meeting was held on August 28t" 2017.
o The meeting provided a good opportunity to review the latest site plan which
reflected revisions as agreed upon during previous meetings.
D. General Plan Policy Conformance
The proposed General Plan Amendment is in conformance with the following Town
policies in the Community chapter of the General Plan:
• CC.2. Provide appropriate park facilities and services for residents of all ages in the
community.
In addition to natural undeveloped open space, a neighborhood park will be built
onsite to serve the neighborhood. The exact type of amenities will be determined
during the development process.
• CC.3. Link existing and planned neighborhoods with parks and open spaces by
incorporating path and trail facilities.
Developer will provide an in -lieu fee to the Town for constructing a future multi -use
path along Shannon Road.
• CC.4. Provide public open space and park space where there is an existing park
shortage or a need to preserve open space, natural areas or scenic views.
0WLBShannon 80 — General Plan Amendment
.%.P WLB No. 116028-A-001
The project will have a neighborhood park and ESLO open space will be preserved per
Town requirements.
• CC.B. Foster development of complete neighborhoods with easy access to
transportation and employment options, and commercial areas that offer amenities
and services for residents' daily needs.
In addition to its ideal location south of Ironwood Ridge High School and along an
arterial roadway, the project will be within close proximity of the Capella Master
Planned Community (currently in the rezoning process) which will provide commercial
areas, additional amenities and services. The project is also within a 1.5 mile proximity
to two growth areas identified as Tier 2 Growth Areas located at the intersections of
Tangerine Road and La Cholla Boulevard and Lambert Lane and La Canada Drive.
• CC.9. Promote community interaction by planning for public land uses, such as parks,
schools and other civic uses to act as the focus of neighborhoods.
Community interaction will be supported based on the project's location adjacent to
Ironwood Ridge High School, and through the use of a neighborhood park.
The proposed General Plan Amendment is in conformance with the following Town
policies in the Environment chapter of the General Plan:
• SD.1. Identify, preserve and manage an integrated and connected open space system
that protects Oro Valley's natural resources and provides enjoyment for residents and
visitors while recognizing our place in the larger ecosystem.
The development of this property will preserve the three Critical Resource Areas to the
greatest extent possible as required by the ESLO, and will minimize topographic
changes. The project will also be in conformance with the native plant preservation
requirements to minimize the disturbance of significant vegetation (including
ironwood tree stands and significant saguaros) and mitigate for any disturbances.
• SD.2. Protect and provide connections between contiguous, environmentally
sensitive lands within the Town, including key habitat areas and significant natural
resource areas.
The Critical Resource Areas and the Core Resource Areas on the property will be
preserved, except for necessary roadway crossings and required infrastructure,
including areas of significant vegetation (containing significant saguaros and
ironwood tree stands). The preservation of these key habitat areas will provide
contiguous connections between offsite habitat areas and allow for wildlife movement
throughout the site.
Shannon 80 — General Plan Amendment
WLB No. 116028-A-001
• SD.4. Protect and conserve healthy native vegetation during the development
process.
The development of this property will be in conformance with the native plant
preservation requirements to minimize the disturbance of significant vegetation and
mitigate for any disturbances. A Native Plant Preservation Waiver has been
submitted, but per the Zoning Code the waiver does not apply to significant Ironwood
Trees or Saguaro Cacti within the developable area. Denser areas of Ironwood Trees
exist along the southern half of the property, which will be preserved in its natural
state within a conservation easement.
• SD.6. Protect scenic corridors, public park and trail view sheds, and the distinctive
visual character and visual appeal of Oro Valley.
The proposed residential development will preserve surrounding views in the
neighborhood through the use of a natural bufferyard along the perimeter of the
property which will soften any visual impacts to the surrounding landowners. The
project site is located outside of scenic corridors.
• SD.7. Enhance, protect, create and restore native biological habitats, especially along
washes, groundwater basins, recharge areas and wildlife corridors, in order to benefit
native plant and wildlife habitats and species movement, minimize the negative
impacts of invasive species and provide protection from flood risk.
The vast majority of Critical Resource Areas and the Core Resource Areas on the
property will be preserved in their natural condition, which will help reduce impacts to
onsite floodplains. The preservation of these key habitat areas will provide contiguous
connections between offsite habitat areas and allow for wildlife movement
throughout the site.
• SD.B. Encourage development project designs that connect wildlife habitat areas,
avoid disturbing significant wildlife habitats and minimize the overall impacts on
wildlife habitat areas.
By clustering the home sites along the northern property boundary, the impact to the
Critical Resource and Core Resource Areas will be minimized allowing for greater
wildlife habitats and habitat connectivity. In addition, the property was designed to
minimize the impact of road crossings to the Critical Resource and Core Resource
Areas.
• SD.10. Strive to protect the public and environment from the threats and risks of
stormwater surges and potential negative impacts of contaminants from runoff.
In accordance with Town policy, post -developed 100-year stormwater discharges
7 Shannon 80—General Plan Amendment
WLB No. 116028-A-001
exiting the site will be maintained in their current condition and reduced as required
by the Town Engineer.
The following "neighbor agreements" relative to off -site drainage improvements, are
to be completed to further reduce stormwater run-off.
o Improvements along Owl Vista Place, which include larger culverts, armoring
the road, and raising the road in necessary areas.
o Working with Pima County to identify possible improvements along Saguaro
Divide.
o Working with Amphitheater School District to identify possible improvements
to Ironwood Ridge High School Property.
• CRA. Identify, preserve and interpret significant cultural resources within Oro Valley
and the larger planning area.
As part of the rezoning process a records check has been solicited from the Arizona
State Museum. The museum's findings indicate that no sites are located within the
project area. Local and State regulations will be followed if any cultural resources are
identified onsite.
The proposed General Plan Amendment is in conformance with the Town's policies in
the Development chapter of the General Plan:
• LUA. Promote land use development practices and programs that conserve and
minimize impacts to natural and cultural resources.
Development of the property will be done with a focus on preserving its
environmentally sensitive areas, and will conserve the percentages of land required by
the Town's ESLO guidelines. To do this, the development will protect the property's
three washes, as well as clustering development in the less environmentally sensitive
areas of the site and avoiding a majority of the Core Resource Area.
• LUA. Promote outdoor lighting that enhances safety and circulation, beautifies
landscapes, minimizes impacts to adjacent properties and does not reduce public
enjoyment of the night sky.
The proposed development will comply with Oro Valley Town Code and utilize dark sky
compliant lighting.
• LU.S. Provide diverse land uses that meet the Town's overall needs and effectively
transition in scale and density adjacent to neighborhoods.
This plan focuses on minimizing the impact of development on the neighbors by
providing large areas of open space in the southern and western portions of the
Shannon 80 — General Plan Amendment
WLB No. 116028-A-001
property. This will serve as a buffer between this development and the existing
residences to the south and west. By increasing the density on this property to LDR1,
it will act as an appropriate and effective transition from the higher density
developments to the north and east and the lower density developments to the west
and south.
• LU.6. Maintain the small-town, neighborly character and improve the design and
safety of the built environment.
By clustering the homes of this development in less environmentally significant areas,
it will allow for significant open space and buffering. There will be connectivity to the
arterial road network for emergency services and convenient access to nearby goods
and services. The subject property will have one access point that will connect this
neighborhood directly to Shannon Road, aligning with Sahuaro Divide. The Traffic
Impact Analysis recommended a southbound left-hand turn lane into the project. Both
northbound and southbound left -turn lanes at the project entrance (intersection of
Shannon Road and Sahuaro Divide) as well as a southbound left -turn lane at the
intersection of Shannon Road and Owl Vista Place will be installed to reflect the traffic
analysis and agreement with neighbors.
• LU.8. Encourage the development of master planned communities which include
suitable residential and commercial uses.
The proposed LDR1 development will be planned so that it will fit within the larger
context of the area, providing an appropriate transition between the higher densities
to the east and north and the lower densities to the west and south. The areas of the
property near existing low density residential neighborhoods will be preserved as open
space while development will be clustered in areas of the property closer to the public
school and nearby lands planned for higher density development. This will allow the
development to better integrate with the existing neighborhoods and activity centers.
• DG.1. Require new development to pay its share toward the cost of additional public
facility and service needs generated by new development, while balancing public and
private interests in cost allocation.
As part of the rezoning of the property, a Traffic Impact Analysis has been completed.
The Traffic Impact Analysis recommended a southbound left-hand turn lane into the
project be considered. Both northbound and southbound left -turn lanes at the project
entrance (intersection of Shannon Road and Sahuaro Divide) as well as a southbound
left -turn lane at the intersection of Shannon Road/Owl Vista Place will be installed to
reflect the traffic analysis and agreement with neighbors. The developer will pay its
share toward the cost of additional public infrastructure needs generated by new
development.
Shannon 80—General Plan Amendment
WLB No. 116028-A-001
• 1.1. Accommodate community services and utilities that meet the larger community
needs and goals.
Developer will provide an in -lieu fee to the Town for constructing a future multi -use
path along Shannon Road.
• 1.2. Consider aesthetics and visual impacts of utilities and infrastructure during the
planning, design or upgrade process, to the extent reasonably possible.
The development of the property will provide the appropriate buffers for the washes
as well as for the surrounding neighborhoods and school. All utilities will be installed
underground.
• 1.6. Provide for safety, efficiency and environmentally -sensitive design in stormwater
systems.
Stormwater systems will meet Town code requirements. Drainage will be carefully
analyzed according to Town drainage design requirements. Once developed, the site
will have detention basins that will retain storm water runoff and meter it out at less
than pre -developed conditions.
Shannon 80 — General Plan Amendment
MUMBWLB No. 116028-A-001
• ��iiii�l
Wilson
K-8 School
� �■ ���ii11:
, 11III■11 oI/gloom
� . t
.I -
' ■ �,■_ II 11'1111�
�,'• -Ironwood
-
MEN
,,,� • High School
i ��
WWI �■
I■� ENEMIES
= l = 11111►
I■E,.- �IIIIIIIIIIr � �.i,�i
__■■■ r Subject
-
rty
IIIIII ���■� r ��
II■■ Fm
IIII: �0 NONE
IIII� � �
■■��■■ soon
oil■ ���OEs■
son ■■ oil�1
Location Map ® 0' 1/4mile
The Shannon 80 - General Plan Amendment
Group_ WLB No. 116028-A-001
Rural Low
Density
Low Density Residential
Residential
(0-0.3 DU/AC)
(0.4-1.2DU/AC)
NARANJA DR
School
Rural Low Density
Residential
(0-0.3 DU/AC)
SUBJECT
Z
PROPERTY
0
Z
U
2
C/)
�
d
N
U_
�
Z
a
0
O
U
,
J
E
a
O
K
O
3
Rural Low Density
W
H
0
L
Z
D
Residential (0-0.3 DU/AC)
[ , -
Public/Semi Public
Master Plan
Community
Existing General Plan Land Use Designations Ell 01 600'
The Shannon 80 - General Plan Amendment
c o PUIM WLB No.116028-A-001
Rural Low Density Low Density Residential
Residential (0-0.3 DU/AC) (0.4-1.2DU/AC)
F-
NARANJA DR -
r �
School
Rural Low Density . x
Residential
(0-0.3 DU/AC)
SUBJECT
z PROPERTY
z
Q Low Density Residential
Cn (0.4-1.2DU/AC) a
a�
U)
U_
Z
Z
0 w
U
E
a 0
W K
H O
3 Rural Low Density
Residential (0-0.3 DU/AC)
Z
Public/Semi Public
Master Plan
Community
Proposed General Plan Land Use Designations E!9
0 600'
The IIFM Shannon 80 General Plan Amendment
c v_ WLB No.116028-A-0
A 001
SHANNON SO
REZONING SITEANALYSIS
OV1701677
AS APPROVED 721612017
17
PREPARED FOR:
Shannon 77 LLC
700 E. Broadway Blvd. STE 200
Tucson, Arizona 85719
PREPARED BY:
The WLB Group, Inc.
Attn: Paul Oland
4444 East Broadway
Tucson, Arizona 85711
WLB No. 116028-A-001
February 14, 2018
The
Groupu
QA116028 Shannon 80\A-001\01 Planning\04 Rezone or GPA\Site Analysis\Shannon 80 Rezoning Site Analysis.docx
CONTENTS
Introduction....................................................................................................................................1
PartI
— Inventory & Analysis............................................................................................................ 3
1.
Existing Land Uses........................................................................................................................................ 5
A. Regional Context..................................................................................................................................................5
B. Onsite Uses..........................................................................................................................................................5
C. Project Vicinity.....................................................................................................................................................
5
2.
Environmentally Sensitive Lands.................................................................................................................. 6
A. ESL Categories Onsite..........................................................................................................................................
6
B. Additional ESL Characteristics..............................................................................................................................
7
C. Total acreage present on -site for each Conservation Category ...........................................................................
7
3.
Topography..................................................................................................................................................7
A. Topographic Character & Features......................................................................................................................7
4.
Cultural /Archaeological / Historic Resources.............................................................................................. 8
A. Archaeological Survey Status / Results................................................................................................................
8
5.
Hydrology..................................................................................................................................................10
A. Offsite Watersheds............................................................................................................................................10
B. Balanced / Critical Basins...................................................................................................................................10
C. Offsite Features Affecting or Affected by the Property.....................................................................................10
D. Area of Upstream Watersheds Greater than 100 CFS.......................................................................................10
E. Location / Ownership of Well Sites within 100' of Site......................................................................................10
F. Onsite Hydrology Characteristics.......................................................................................................................10
G. Existing Drainage Conditions along the Downstream Property Boundary .........................................................11
6.
Wildlife......................................................................................................................................................
12
A. Arizona Game & Fish Dept. Letter.....................................................................................................................12
7.
Viewsheds..................................................................................................................................................23
8.
Traffic.........................................................................................................................................................24
A. Connection to Arterial Roadway Network.........................................................................................................
24
B. Arterial Roadways within One Mile of the Property..........................................................................................24
9.
Recreation /Trails......................................................................................................................................
26
A. Trails, Parks and Recreation Areas within One Mile of the Property.................................................................26
10. Schools.......................................................................................................................................................
27
Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
WLB No. 116028-A-001
A. Schools within One Mile of the Property...........................................................................................................
27
B. Schools Expected to Serve the Project...............................................................................................................
27
11. Water.........................................................................................................................................................
28
A. Water Service Provider......................................................................................................................................
28
12. Wastewater...............................................................................................................................................
29
A. Sewer Service Connection.................................................................................................................................
29
13. Exhibits......................................................................................................................................................
30
Exhibit 1-1-A: Site Location Map...................................................................................................................
31
Exhibit 1-1-8: Aerial Photograph..................................................................................................................
32
Exhibit 1-1-C. Existing General Plan Future Land Use Designations..............................................................
33
Exhibit1-1-D: Existing Zoning.......................................................................................................................
34
Exhibit 1-1-E: Existing Land Uses..................................................................................................................
35
Exhibit 1-2-A: Environmentally Sensitive Lands............................................................................................
36
Exhibit1-3-A: Topography............................................................................................................................
37
Exhibit 1-5-A: Offsite Watersheds.................................................................................................................
38
Exhibit 1-5-8: Onsite Hydrology Characteristics............................................................................................
39
Exhibit 1-8-A: Transportation.......................................................................................................................
40
Exhibit 1-9-A: Trails, Parks & Recreation......................................................................................................
41
Exhibit 1-10-A: Existing & Proposed Schools.................................................................................................
42
Exhibit1-12-A: Sewer Service.......................................................................................................................
43
Exhibit 1-13-A: McHorg Composite Map......................................................................................................
44
PartII — Land Use Plan...................................................................................................................45
1. Land Uses................................................................................................................................................... 47
A. Project Description............................................................................................................................................47
B. General Plan Conformance................................................................................................................................47
C. Flexible Design Options / Conservation Subdivision Design...............................................................................47
D. Effect on Existing Land Uses..............................................................................................................................48
2. Environmentally Sensitive Lands................................................................................................................ 49
A. ESOS Selection & Preservation Methods...........................................................................................................49
3. Topography................................................................................................................................................50
A. Design Response to Site Topography.................................................................................................................50
B. Slope Encroachment..........................................................................................................................................50
C. Hillside Conservation Areas...............................................................................................................................50
D. Quantified Site Disturbance...............................................................................................................................50
Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
WLB No. 116028-A-001
4. Cultural / Archaeological / Historic Resources............................................................................................ 51
A. Resource Protection..........................................................................................................................................51
B. Treatment Plan..................................................................................................................................................51
5. Hydrology.................................................................................................................................................. 52
A. Design Response to Site Hydrology....................................................................................................................52
B. Modifications of Drainage Patterns...................................................................................................................52
C. Mitigation..........................................................................................................................................................52
D. Town Policy Conformance.................................................................................................................................52
6. Wildlife...................................................................................................................................................... 53
A. Mitigation..........................................................................................................................................................53
7. Viewsheds..................................................................................................................................................54
A. Design Response to Site Viewsheds................................................................................................................... 54
B. ORSCOD / TRCOD Conformance........................................................................................................................ 54
8. Traffic.........................................................................................................................................................55
A. Traffic Impact Analysis.......................................................................................................................................55
B. Proposed Rights-of-Way....................................................................................................................................56
C. Proposed Pedestrian / Bicycle Circulation......................................................................................................... 56
9. Recreation / Trails...................................................................................................................................... 57
A. Offsite Trail Access.............................................................................................................................................57
B. Open Space Ownership......................................................................................................................................57
10. Schools....................................................................................................................................................... 58
A. Student Generation...........................................................................................................................................58
B. School Capacity..................................................................................................................................................58
11. Water......................................................................................................................................................... 61
A. Water Demand.................................................................................................................................................. 61
B. Water Service Provider & Capacity.................................................................................................................... 61
12. Wastewater............................................................................................................................................... 64
A. Sewer Service Method.......................................................................................................................................64
13. Bufferyards................................................................................................................................................ 66
A. Mitigation (if applicable)....................................................................................................................................66
14. Exhibits...................................................................................................................................................... 67
Exhibit 11-1-A: Tentative Development Plan................................................................................................. 68
Exhibit 11-2-A: Proposed ESOS Map.............................................................................................................. 69
Exhibit 11-3-A: Proposed Grading Limits....................................................................................................... 70
Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
M WLB No. 116028-A-001
Exhibit 11-4-A: Proposed Zoning.................................................................................................................... 71
Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
WLB No. 116028-A-001
Introduction
Introduction
This site analysis has been prepared in support of a proposed rezoning of Shannon 80. This project is a proposed 76.4± acre
residential subdivision located on the east side of Shannon Road between Lambert Lane and Naranja Drive. Currently the
subject property remains undeveloped. The proposed project will increase the density on the subject property but remain
substantially out of Critical Resource and Core Resource Areas identified through the Town's Environmentally Sensitive
Lands Ordinance (ESLO).
The proposed density increase is supported by several factors including its proximity to activity hubs such as Ironwood Ridge
High School, Wilson K-8 School, Casas Church, Casas Christian School and the Capella Master Planned Development. This
project will help act as a buffer between the lower density neighborhoods to the south and west, and the higher density
land uses to the east and north.
This request is to rezone the property from the current R1-144 to R1-36. The vision is to develop three clusters of homes,
separated by the Critical Resource Areas running through the site and surrounded by large swaths of open space along the
southern and western edges of the property.
In order to make this residential project a reality, the appropriate land entitlements must be acquired for the property. The
property owner is focused on acquiring the necessary entitlements in Oro Valley through a rezoning of the subject property.
(Please refer to Exhibit A: Location Map.)
Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
WLB No. 116028-A-001
Introduction
(This i)ooe intentionally blonl.)
Tlk Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
WLB No. 116028-A-001
Part I — Inventory & Analysis
Part I — Inventory & Analysis
Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
0.%V-WM WLB No. 116028-A-001
Part 1— Inventory & Analysis
(This page intentionally blank)
TyrnLeB
Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
MN" WLB No. 116028-A-001
Part I — Inventory & Analysis
1. Existing Land Uses
A. Regional Context
The property subject to this rezoning request consists of 76.4± acres located in the Town of Oro Valley in
Section 9, Township 11S, Range 13E, Pima County Arizona. The property is located immediately east of
Shannon Road, south of Ironwood Ridge High School, north of Owl Vista Place, and approximately a half
mile west of La Cholla Boulevard. The Pima County Tax Assessor designates the subject property as parcel
numbers 224-21-0020, 0030, 0040, and 0050.
Please refer to Exhibit 1-1-A: Site Location Map and Exhibit 1-1-B: Aerial Photograph.
B. Onsite Uses
The subject property is currently undeveloped and vacant, and zoned R1-144. The Town of Oro Valley is
currently reviewing a General Plan Amendment request on the subject property to redesignate the
property from Rural Low Density Residential (R-LDR) to Low Density Residential LDR1 on the General Plan
land use map.
Please refer to Exhibit 1-1-C: Existing General Plan Future Land Use Designations.
C. Project Vicinity
Please refer to Exhibit 1-1-D: Existing Zoning and Exhibit 1-1-E: Existing Land Uses. The subject property is
surrounded by the following existing zonings and land uses:
a/b: Existing Zoning and Land Uses
North: Existing zoning:
R1-36 (Single -Family Residential —Town of Oro Valley)
R1-144 (Single -Family Residential —Town of Oro Valley)
Existing land use:
Ironwood Ridge High School
LDR (low Density Residential)
R-LDR (Rural -low Density Residential)
East: Existing zoning:
111-7 (Single -Family Residential —Town of Oro Valley)
R1-144 (Single -Family Residential —Town of Oro Valley)
Existing land use:
Medium Density Residential (MDR)
Public/Semi Public
LDR (low Density Residential)
R-LDR (Rural -low Density Residential)
T Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
soap-WLB WLB No. 116028-A-001
Southeast: Existing zoning
Existing land use
South: Existing zoning:
Existing land use
West: Existing zoning:
Existing land use
Northwest: Existing zoning:
Existing land use
Part I — Inventory & Analysis
R1-144 (Single -Family Residential — Town of Oro Valley)
Public / Semi Public
LDR (low Density Residential)
R1-144 (Single -Family Residential — Town of Oro Valley)
R-LDR (Rural -Low Density Residential)
SR (Suburban Ranch — Pima County)
LIU-0.3 (Low Intensity Urban — Pima County)
SR (Suburban Ranch — Pima County)
LIU-0.3 (Low Intensity Urban — Pima County)
c: Number of Stories of Surrounding Structures
Adjacent structures within a quarter mile of the subject property include both one and two-story
single-family detached homes, and schools facilities up to three stories in height.
d: Pending Rezonings
The adjoining Capella property to the east is undergoing a rezoning from R1-144 to Planned Area
Development for a project that includes a mixture of residential densities from low density
residential to high density residential, commercial, and open space. Additionally, Saguaros Viejos
Phase 2 northeast of the proposed development, requests to rezone the subject property from R1-
20 to R1-7.
e: Conditionally Approved Zonings
There are no conditionally approved zonings within a quarter mile of the subject property.
f: Subdivisions and/or Development Plans Approved
There are several residential developments along La Cholla Boulevard that are in various stages of
construction and platting. These include the Estates at Capella (120 lots) east of Ironwood Ridge
High School, Saguaros Viejos (118 lots) on the north side of Naranja Drive, and Rancho de Plata (50
lots) and Rancho del Cobre (68 lots) to the north near Glover Road.
g: Architectural Styles Used in Adjacent Projects
The architectural styles used in adjacent projects are mainly wood frame or block homes that utilize
a stucco and/or stone veneer and have either a flat or tiled roof.
2. Environmentally Sensitive Lands
A. ESL Categories Onsite
The subject property consists of three Environmentally Sensitive Land categories. Approximately 31% or
23.8± acres of the property is within the Core Resource Area. Approximately 60% or 45.4 ± acres of the
7Wt Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
Grasp WLB No. 116028-A-001
Part 1— Inventory & Analysis
property is within the Resource Management Area Tier 1. The remaining 9% or 7.2 acres of the site is within
in the Critical Resource Area. The vegetation community on the property is typical of the Sonoran Desert
scrub Paloverde-Mixed Cacti, which includes Saguaro, Ironwood, Palo Verde, Mesquite, Cholla, Prickly pear,
Ocotillo, and Barrel Cactus.
B. Additional ESL Characteristics
No regulated rock outcrops occur on site.
Please refer to Exhibit 1-2-A: Environmentally Sensitive Lands.
C. Total acreage present on -site for each Conservation Category.
Major Wildlife Linkage
-----------
0
-------------------------------------------- ------------- .......................................
Critical Resource Area
- - - - ------------------
........................................... - -
7.2±
........- ..------------------
--
Core Resource Area
........ -.... -------------------------
---------
23.8±
RMA Tier 1
- - .......... .......... ......... ................
45.4±
RMA Tier 2
........................................--------.._..-�-----..�—.._-..............--------------------------------------------..........
........ -..............................................
0
RMA Tier 3
0
3. Topography
A. Topographic Character & Features
The topography of the subject property is characterized by relatively flat terrain and some undulating areas
adjacent to the washes that run across the site. The property generally slopes downward from northeast
to southwest. Elevations range from approximately 2,664 feet at the highest point on the northeast side
to 2,628 feet at the lowest point on the southwest side of the property. The site contains no areas of
regulated slopes greater than 15%. The site does not contain any restricted peaks, ridgelines or other
significant topographic features. No areas of this development are subject to the ESL Hillside Area
Category.
Please refer to Exhibit 1-3-A: Topography.
15%to less than 18%
--------------...................................................... - - - -
0
......-----------
18% less than 20%
..---------------------------------------------------------------------------
................... --
........... 0
20% to less than 25%
.... ....... ...............................---------------------------------------------------------
0
25%to less than 33%
-----------------------------.....------------------.........................---.....................
----------.......
0
33% or greater
............................ .....-.._..__.._.._..........------............-----------
- - ---
........ .0
---- .......... --------------------------------------....................................-----------
....... 0
Rock Outcrops & Boulders
0
iTyy Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
GrouP4a" WLB No. 116028-A-001
Part I — Inventory & Analysis
4. Cultural / Archaeological / Historic Resources
A. Archaeological Survey Status / Results
i. The project site has been surveyed for cultural resources by Westland Resources, and the report has
been submitted to the Town for review.
ii. No significant cultural resources meeting the Arizona or the National Register of Historic Places
eligibility criteria have been found on the property.
iii. In the unlikely event that cultural resources are uncovered during construction, a professional
archaeologist will evaluate the exposed material before any work continues in the area of the discovery.
If any human remains or funerary objects are discovered during the construction of this project, all
work will stop within the area of the remains and all such discoveries will be treated in accordance with
Arizona Revised Statute §41-865
TvShannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
fOuP WLB No. 116028-A-001
Part 1— Inventory & Analysis
Prepared by:
Erma Gruner
Reviewed and submitted by:
John M. Lrndly, Ph.D.
Cultural Resources Report 2017-77
September 15, 2017
Project Number 2019.01
WestLand Resources
WPsil and 14-•sana•s, Inc • 4(N!1 t Pawdnt' IJlls Omw • Im—n Att:Ona KV11 •'•Ill• Ub•'!1Hi
Tw Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
w� W LB No. 116028-A-001
Part I — Inventory & Analysis
5. Hydrology
A. Offsite Watersheds
The primary off -site watershed impacting the project site feeds to an unnamed wash that follows a
southwesterly route across the Property's northwestern corner. This portion of the property is designated
as being within Zone 'A' while the remaining site is within a Clear Zone 'X' per the FEMA Flood Insurance
Rate Map (FIRM) Panel 04019C1070L, Revised June 16, 2011. The off -site terrain of the upstream
watersheds is mostly native desert vegetation, several roadway crossings and some lower to medium
density residential development. Ironwood Ridge High School has significantly affected the drainage
patterns immediately north of the project. Two minor watersheds also impact the property
Please refer to Exhibit 1-5-A: Offsite Watersheds.
B. Balanced / Critical Basins
The entire Town of Oro Valley is classified as a critical basin.
C. Offsite Features Affecting or Affected by the Property
Ironwood Ridge High School is located directly upstream of the site. Downstream of the site are large lot
single-family residential homes. The low density nature of the existing development generally allows most
drainage to flow naturally. The northwestern side of the project site is impacted by an unnamed wash which
is mapped by FEMA as subject to 1% annual chance of flood, and which is estimated by Pima County to
have a 100-year discharge of approximately 1000-2000 cfs.
D. Area of Upstream Watersheds Greater than 100 CFS
The wash running through the center of the property ("Wash A") has a watershed area of approximately
155 acres. The wash running through the eastern portion of the property ("Wash B") has a watershed area
of approximately 98 acres. The major watershed impacting the western portion of the sites has a
watershed area of approximately 1,656 acres.
Please refer to Exhibit 1-5-B: Onsite Hydrology Characteristics.
E. Location / Ownership of Well Sites within 100' of Site
According to the Arizona Department of Water Resources, there is one (1) well located in the southwest
portion of the project site. Well registry ID: 55-206095.
F. Onsite Hydrology Characteristics
Three braided washes run through the site in a south -southwesterly direction. The wash along the
northwest corner of the site is classified as a FEMA floodplain. The entire site is typical of the upland desert
biome, featuring a mix of cactus, mesquites, palo verde, and other species. Pima County GIS data describes
the soils as a mixed hydrological soil group. Onsite hydrologic analysis has been performed using the
Rational Method. The runoff coefficients were prepared using the Town of Oro Valley Drainage Criteria
Manual, and are based on soil types noted in the National Resource Conservation Service soils study. The
hydrologic soil type within the project boundary is comprised of soils: Hayhook-Sahuarita complex A-60%
Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
WUMBWLB No.116028-A-001
Part I — Inventory & Analysis
and C-40%. The vegetative cover and density have been determined using recent aerial photographs and
field reconnaissance. The rainfall data was determined using the NOAA 14 (upper 90% confidence) and
Generalized I-D-F Curves as found within Figure 3-3 of the TOV Drainage Criteria Manual.
Please refer to Exhibit 1-5-B: Onsite Hydrology Characteristics
Approximate 100-year floodplains with discharges equal to or greater than 50 cfs.
The project site contains three 100 year floodplains with discharges equal to or greater than 50 cfs. On
the northwest corner of the site is an unnamed wash that contributes approximately 1000-2000 cfs at
the downstream outlet. Two other washes dividing the site contribute less than 500 cfs at their
downstream outlets.
ii. Areas of sheet flooding, with average depths
The project site is not subject to sheet flooding.
iii. Federally mapped floodways and floodplains
The site has a federally mapped floodplain located on the northwest corner of the project site, as
illustrated with the FEMA FIRM Panel: 04019C1070L
iv. Calculation of all 100-year peak discharges exceeding 50 cfs
There are no on -site sub -basins with 100-year peak discharges exceeding 50 cfs.
G. Existing Drainage Conditions along the Downstream Property Boundary
The existing low density nature of development along the downstream property boundary allows the
drainage to flow naturally.
yLg Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
7��MRIP_� WLB No. 116028-A-001
Part I — Inventory & Analysis
A. Arizona Game & Fish Dept. Letter
Arizona Environmental Online Review Tool Report
Arizona Game and Ftsh .?eparfrnent Mssion
To conserve Arizona's disuse w 1dkfe resources and manage for safe, compatrbke outdoor recreation
opportuneties forcurnsrrl and fu!ure gene•atrons
Project Name
Shannon 80
User Project Number
iieo28-A-001
Project Description
Single-family residential deuelopment,mth appio<imately 121lots
Protect Type
C,e,,elopmentVYdhm Municipalities (Urban Grouath), Residential subdivision and associated infrastructure.
New, construction
Contact Person
Brian Sabn
Organization
The 1r1rL6 Croup
C-h Behalf l7
PI MA
Project ID
WAS-0.3%6
Akeasereweµ theerfrrereload for project type andior cpecresrecomrnerrdatrons for the ,bcvtron
fveformatron entered Fkease retain a copy for future reference
Page 1 oY 11
T, Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
W WLB No. 116028-A-001
Part I — Inventory & Analysis
Arizona Game & Fish Dept. Letter (cont'd)
Attzona0ameand FishDepxfrnent ptojectreport shannon 80_�1090 21fi02.pdf
Project ID: H01S.O4W5 Review Date: IZ-1V2010 MAO:10 PM
Disclaimer:
1. This Environmental Review is based on the projectstudy area thatwis entered. The report must be
updated If the ptojectstudy area, location, or the type of project changes.
2. This is a preliminary environmental screening tool. It Is not asubstlutefor the poterdialknowledge
gained by having a biologist conduct afield survey of the project area. This review is also not intended to
replace environmental consultation (including federal consultation under the Endangered Species ACO.
land use permitting, or the Departments review ofsde•specfic projects.
3. The Departments Heritage Data Managemerd System(HDMS) data is not intended to include potential
distribution of special status species.Artzona is large and diversewith plants, animals, and
envaonmental conditions that are ever changing. Consequently, many areas may containspecies that
biologists do notknow abort or species previously noted in a particular area may no longer occur there.
HDMS data contains information about species occurrences that have actually been reported to the
Department Not all of Arizona has been surveyed for special status species, and surveys that have been
conducted have varied greatly in scope and intensity. Such surveys may reveal previously
undocumented population of species of special concern.
4. HabiMapArcona data, specifically Species of Oreatest Conservation Need (SOCt) under our State
Wildlife Action Plan (SVVAP) and Species of Economic and R ecreational Importance (SERI). represerd
potential species distribution models for the State of Arizona which ate subject to ongoing change,
modification and refinement. The status of awildlfe resource can change quickly, and the availability of
new data will necessitate a refined assessment
Locations Axuracy Discla mer:
Project locations are assumed to be both precise and accurate for the purposes of environmental review. The
creator/owner of the Project R eview Report is solely responsible for the project location and thus the correctness
of the Project Review Report content
PV 2of11
Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
WLB No. 116028-A-001
Part I — Inventory & Analysis
Arizona Game & Fish Dept. Letter (cont'd)
Arizona Game and Fish Department projecLrepod_shannon 80-. 0IM 211502.pdf
Project ID. HGIS,O4565 Review Data: 1215W003:40:18PM
Recommendations 04sclamer.
t The Department is interested in the corisen�aton of all tsh and vvildlfe resources, inoluding nose
speaes listed in this report and those that may have not been documented within the projectvioinity as
well as other game and nongame wildlife
2. Recommendations have been made by the Department, under authority of Arizona Revised Statutes
Title 5 jAmusements and Sports), 17 (Game and F ish), and 28 (Transportation).
3. Potential impacts to fish and wildlife resources may be minimized or avoided by Ore recommendations
generated from information subrrvted for your proposed project. These recommendations are preliminary
in scope, designed to provide early considerations on alspecies ofwildlife
4. Making this Information directly avigable does notsubstlutefor the Departments review of projed
proposals, Andshouid not decrease our opportunity to review and evaluate additional project information
and/or new project proposals.
5 Further coordination with the Department requires the submittal of this Environmental Review Reportwith
a cover letter and project plans or documentation that includes project narrative, acreage to be impacted,
hour construction of project activity(s) are to be accomplished. and project locality into fin afionConctoding
site map) OnceAGFD had receivedthe information, please allow 30 days for completion of project
ievieios Send requests to
Project Evaluation Program, Habitat Branch
Arizona Oame and Fish Depart inert
50DO West Carefree Highway
Phoenix, Arizona8OD86-5000
Phone Number: (1823)2367600
Fax Number (623)236.7366
Or
PFPOPAZOM aov
6 Coordination may also be neoessary under the National Environmental Policy Act(NEPA) and/or
Endangered Spooks Aot(ESA). Sitespecific recommendations may be proposed duringfurther
NEPA+ESA analysls orthrough coordinationvvfh affected agencies
P age 30111
rwr& Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
NrrwP" WLB No. 116028-A-001
Part I — Inventory & Analysis
Arizona Game & Fish Dept. Letter (cont'd)
Arizona Game and Fish Department proiect_report_shannon 80 21093_21602 pdf
Protect ID HGIS-04565 Review Date 12/5/2016 03 40 16 PM
Shannon 80
Aerial Image Basemap With Locator Map
Protect Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary
Project sae (arias) 77 W
L&O-ong (DD) 12 4044 r 111.0255
CoLoty(a) Pirm
AGFD Rapian(a) Tuaon
TwmsMplRar"a) T17S RIM
USGS Oued(s): RUELAS CANYON
6W= Layor CM" 5ftrM Eon. NEW OeLOMW Tom7wr. InWrop.
moMff*M P Cory GEBC0. LMGB FAQ, NPB. NRCAN OsoeaM, ON
Kbd"W NL. OnZW" 91Kgy EeR JepaR. METI. En CP v (Meng KORO).
Page 4 of 11
Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
WLB No. 116028-A-001
Part I — Inventory & Analysis
Arizona Game & Fish Dept. Letter (cont'd)
Arizona Game and Fish Department prolect_report_stlannon 80 21093 21602 pdf
Pro)ect ID HGIS-04565 Review Date 12l5/2016 03 40 16 PM
Shannon 80
Web Map As Submitted By User
LJ Pro)ed Boundary ProWA Stze (acres) 77.80
Buffered Propct Boundary LaULonq (DD) 32 40441-111.0255
County(s) Pima
AGFD Reg)on(s) Tucson
Townsnp?tarpels) T12S R13E
USGS Oued(s) RLIVELAS CANYON
-- e..- tw——....v.r u..ww u�aw ua u.w�
'age ` of 11
Tr e� Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
Ao� WLB No. 116028-A-001
Part I — Inventory & Analysis
Arizona Game & Fish Dept. Letter (cont'd)
Anzona Game and Fish Department pro)ect_report_stlanrton 8C0 21093 21602 pdt
Project ID HGIS-04565 Review Date 12/5/2016 03 40 16 PM
Shannon 80
Tono Baseman With Township/Ranoes and Land Ownership
lJ tsamew "opci nounaary
TownshiyRarpes
AZ Game and rMh Dept
UiM
ROR
Indun Res
Mastery
neaonai "rmwn
LaULonq (DD). 32.4044 1 •111,0255
Private
C,ounty(s). Pima
State aro Ragtona Pesos AGED Region(s) Tucson
State Trust
Town NPIRanpe(s) T12S R13E
US For"I Service
USGS Ouod(a) RUEIAS CANYON
VVMbfo Areat"upe
Yea. brawe Ow.awr iw c'sa { Guy Ga(ti IIM:Y NL
0 —i .. 6A r�Mar M a o..Q ..w Ew 6 � Ev
om iwa AUW ramEo M� a OEwWtayyp ca�ewry w r
AA —
Page 6 of 1 I
Tom, Shannon 80 -Rezoning Site Analysis
soup WLB No. 116028-A-001
Arizona Game & Fish Dept. Letter (cont'd)
At¢ona Game and Fah Department
ProiectlD 1-16ISO4555
Part I — Inventory & Analysis
projecLreport_shannon 80 21043 21eO2 pill
Review Date: IZW01803.40 15 PM
Special Status Specie_- and Special Areas Documented vAhin =: A41ec of Project Vicinity
Ssientiic,Nama
Common Name
FWS USFS BLM NPL
SGCN
Aquila chrysaetos
Golden Eagle
BOA S
18
Glauci hum brasilianum cactorum
Cactus Ferruginous Pygmy -owl
SC S 5
18
Gopherus moratkai
Sonoran Desert Tortoise
C CA S
1A
Leptonyctera curasoae
Lesser Longnosed Bat
lF
1A
yerbabuenae
Tucson • Tortolita • Santa Catalina
Wildlife Corridor
Mountains Lhkage Design
Nete. Status cod& defowterrs can be found at h%s JAwww x?g1d torts ddlire/n a n in g&yildlitag odelrn cktigutdoti nifin nil
Specfesof Greatest Conservation Need
Predicted v,4thin Project 1016nity based on Predicted
Range Models
Sciertllic Name
Common Name
FWS
USFS
BLM
NPL SGCN
Abcsponsa
Wood1)uok
1B
Ammaspermophilus ha itsii
Harra'Antalope Squirrel
1B
Anarcyrus retitormis
Sonoran (keen Toad
S
18
Anthus spragueti
Sprague'$ Pipit
C.
1A
Anttestomus ridgwayi
Buff -collared Nighle
S
18
Aquila chrysaetas
Golden Eagle
BOA
S
11)
Aspidcacelis stictogramma
Gard Spotted Whiptat
Sc
S
18
Athene cunicularia hypugaea
Western Burrowing Owl
SC
S
S
18
Botaurus lentiginosus
American Bittern
18
Buteo regAis
Ferruginous Hawk
Sc
S
18
CNlomenkcusstramineus
Variable Sandsnake
18
Colaptes chrysoides
Gilded Flicker
S
18
Coluber birneatus
Sonoran tWhlpsnake
1B
Corynorhinus townsendii pakscens Pale Towweend's Big. eared Bat
SC
S
S
19
Crotalus 10"s
Tiger RAdesnake
1B
Cynarthus latirostra
Broad -billed Hummingbird
S
18
Cyprinodonmaoularius
DesertPupfah
LE
1A
D ip od omys s p ecta bi Is
Banner•taikdKangaroo Rat
S
18
Euderma maculatum
Spotted Bat
Sc
S
S
1B
Eumops perotis calitornicus
Greater Western Bonntted Bat
SC
S
16
Falco peregrinus anatum
American Peregrine Falcon
SC
S
S
1A
Olaucidium brasibanum cactorum
Cactus ferruginous Pygmy -owl
SC
S
S
18
Gopherus moratkai
Sonoran Desert Tortoise
CCA
S
1A
Halueetus leucocephalus
Bald Eagle
SC.
S
S
1A
BOA
Helodermasuspectum
Gila Monster
1A
Hypsiglena sp. nov.
Hooded NrghtsnAce
18
Pap T 0111
T Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
` 1 WLB No. 116028-A-001
Part I — Inventory & Analysis
Arizona Game & Fish Dept. Letter (cont'd)
Arizona Game and Fish Department projecLraport shannon 8021093 21002pdf
ProjectiD: HGIS-O45B5 Review Date: 12JU201803.40.10 PM
Species of Greatest Conservation Need
Predicted within Project Mcinity based on Prodded Rwge Models
Scientific Name Common Name FWS USFS BLM
NPL SOCH
Incilius aivarkas
Sonoran Desert Toad
10
14nostamonsonoriensesonoriense
Desert Mud Turtle
S
18
Laskaus blosseviil6
Western Red Bat
S
18
Las iwus xardhinus
W astern Yellow Bat
S
19
Leopardus pardalis
Ocelot
LE
1A
Leptonyduis curwose
Lesser Lonpnosed Bat
LE
1A
yubabuenae
Le pus allanI
Arde lop a J a ck is bb it
1B
Lith ob stes ya v a pa ions is
LoMand Leopard Frog
SC S S
1A
Mauotus caldornicus
Caldornia Leaf -nosed Bat
SC S
1B
Melanupas uropyg W
GIs Woodpecker
1B
Weagtts gatopavornwicuu
GouWzTurkey
S
1B
Mel ospiza IincoInii
Lincoln's Sparrow
18
Wozone abut
Aberfs Towhee
S
18
Micruroides euryxant us
Sonoran Coraisnake
1B
Myotis occult"
Arizona Myots
SC S
1B
Myota voider
Cave MyotG
SC S
1B
Myots yumanerals
Yuma Myotc
SC
1B
Nyctinomops femorosaccus
Pocketed Free -tailed Bat
18
PAnth ata once
Jaguar
LE
1A
Pass uculussandovkhensis
Savannah Sparrow
1B
Petognathus amplus
Arizona PockatMousa
1B
Patognathus longirnembrG
L1ttePocket Mouse
1B
Peucata botterii arizonae
Arizona Botterfs Spartan
S
18
Peucau catpalc
Rufous -winged Sparrow
18
Phrynosomasolare
Regal Horned Lizard
18
Phylothynchus browni
Saddled Laaf-nosed Snake
1B
Poecifiopsis occidentafis
Grla Toprninnary
LE
1A
occidentalis
Prognasubis hasperia
Desert Purple Martin
S
113
Setophaga petechia
YelkwWarbier
18
Sonoiatla papagorum
Black Mourdain Takrssnail
18
Tad xWa tuasAions is
Brazilian Free-taikd Bat
1B
Thomonys umbrirwu Wormedius
Southern Pocket Gopher
1B
Troglodytes pacdicus
PacitcWten
1B
Vireo betla arizonse
Arizona Begs Vireo
1B
Vulpes mactotis
Kit Foot
1B
rVaof11
Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
WLB No. 116028-A-001
Part I — Inventory & Analysis
Arizona Game & Fish Dept. Letter (cont'd)
Arizona Game and Fish Department project report_shannon 8021OD3 21O02.pdf
ProjectlD: HGIS04M8 Review Date: 12AM2O115O3:4O:10 PM
Species of Economc and Recreation Importance Predicted within Project Ycirdty
SciwtIic Name Common Nam FWS USES BLM NPL SGCN
Callipeplagambelit
Garnbefs Quail
Odocodeus hemionus
hAule [Neer
Pecarl talacU
13!telina
Puma concolot
fotourdam Lwn
Zenaida asiatica
'11Yhde tomnged Dove
Zen atda macroura
M,oirninq Do e
Project Type Development %Vithrn Munrapalrti~-1 Urbar, Gro.,dhl, Re:7,denti�l=ubdioDon and assooiated
infrastructure. Newconstruction
Project Type Recommendations
Fence recommendations will be dependard uponthe goats ofthefence project and thewildlfe species expectedto be
impacted by the project General guidelines tot ensuringwildlife. *fondly fences Include barbless wire on lhetop and
bottom with the maximum fence height42", minimum height for bottom 18". Moddicat ions to thus design may be
considered for fencing anticipated to be routinely encountered by ek, bighorn sheep or pronghorn (e.g., Pronghorn
fencing would require 1f3' minimum height on the bottom). Please refer to the Departments fencing Guidelines boated
on Wildlife F riendly Guidelines page, which is part of the WIIdWe Planning button at
hle.r N.w., i�rlA r.i enAnul frills lnl�nn,n nhn,i lAl/.ntn A. I,n nc!
During the planning stages ofyour project, please consider the local or regional needs ofwitdlife in regards to movement,
connectivity, and access to habitat needs Loss of this permeability prevents wildlife from accessing resorxces, finding
mates, reduces gene low, prevents wildlrfe trom re•colonaing areas where local extirpations may have occurred, and
ultirnatety prevents wildlife from contributing to ecosystem functions, such as pollination, seed dispersal, control of pray
numbers, and retistance to invasrve species In many cases, streams andwashes provide natural movement corridors
tot wildlife and should be maintained in their natural state. Uplands also support a large diverstj of species, and should
be contained within importantwildirfe movement corridors In addition, maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem functions
can be facilitated through improving designs of structures, fences, roadways, and culverts to promote passage for a
variety of wildlife Guidelines tot many of these can be found
at httw Aw ura_azaid_c_,muvildtfeiclannindwiAdenuidehnesi
Consider impacts of outdoor fighting on wildlife and develop measures or afternatives that can betaken to increase
human safety while minimizing potential impact to wildlife C onductwildifesurveys to determine speeieswdhin project
area, and evaluate proposed activities based on species biology and natural history to determine A artificial lighting may
disrupt behavior patterns or habitat use Use only the minimum amount of light needed for safety Narrayspeckum bulbs
should be used as often as possible to laver the range otspecres affected by fighting. At lightingshould beshielded,
cantered, or cut to ensure that light reaches orgy areas needing illumination
Minimize potential introduction or spread of exotic invasive species Invasive species can be plants, animals (exotic
snaib), and other organisers (e.g.. microbes), which may cause alteration to ecological lunettons or compete with or prey
upon native species and can cause social impacts (e g., livestock forage reduction, inertssewiWfit risk) The terms
noxious weed or invasive plants are often ured Interchangeably. Precautions should betaken towash all equipment
utilized in tax project activities before leaving the site. Arizona has noxious weed regulations (Arizona Revised Statutes,
Rules R3.4.244 and 143-4248) See Arizona Department of Agriculture webs de for restricted plants.
httW lragrkuLL ALgart Additionally. the U.S. Department of Agriculture has information regarding pest and invasive
plard control methods including pesticide, herbicide, biological cont of agents, and mechanical control,
http;Awimm usda Coy" rytino alrusdahome The Department regulates the importation, purchasing, and transportation of
wildlife and fish(R estricted Live Wildlife), please refer to the hunting regulations for further
rnorrnatim hfiM fAmnu, a7gld com(hunt_ba re r iN c
pay 4or11
Tr % Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis ,
roue WLB No. 116028-A-001
Part I — Inventory & Analysis
Arizona Game & Fish Dept. Letter (cont'd)
Arizona Game and Fish D epariment project report shannon 80_�1M 21a02.pdf
ProiectlD: HGIS045D5 Review Date: 12/61201t)03.40:10PM
The construetlon or maintenance of water development should include incorporation of aspects ofthe natural
ennronment and the visual resources, maintaining the water for a variet/ ofspecies, water surface area(e.g., bats
require a greater area due to in. fight drinking), accessibility, year-round avarlabilty, minimizing potential for water quAV
problems, frequency of flushing, shading of natural features, regular clean-up of debris, escaper amps. minimizing
obstacles, and minifnizing accumulation of silt and mud.
lnmimcahon and mitigationof impacts towildlrre and fishspecies dueto changes inwater quality, quantity, chemistry.
temperature, and attrition to flow regimes (timing. magnitude. duration, and frequency of floods) should be evaluated
tultmnm¢e impacts tosprings, in -stream flow. and consider irrigation improvements to decreasevoater use If dredging is a
project component, consider timing ofthe project in order to minimize impact to sparoningfish and other aquatic species
(include spawningseasons), and to reduce spread of exotic invasive species We recommend early direct coordination
with Project Evaluation Program tot protects that could impactwater resources, wetlands, streams, springs, andvor
riparian habitats
The Department recommends that wildlife surveys are conducted to determine A noise-sensRroe species occur vvrthin the
protect area A�ordance or minimization measures could include conducting project activities outside of breeding
seasons
Based on the project type entered, co ofdinator. with State Historic Preservation Office may be required
I h"t.;; _ a}on , MSHP— I >r Mmll
Trenches should be covered or back-Alled as soon as possible Incorporate escape rampc in ditches or fencing along the
penrrieter to deter small mammals and herptetauna(sn4es, lizards, tortoise)from entering ditches
Communities can actively support the sustainabilrN and mobility of wddlte by incot poratingwrldWe planning into their
regionaYcompithensive plans, their regional transportation plans, and their open spacerconservation Ixndsystem
programs. An effective approach to wildlife planning begins with the identification ofthe wildlife resources in need of
protection, an Assessment of important habitat blocks and connective corridors, and the incorporation of these etitical
wildlife components into the communctir plans and programs Community planners should identify open spaces and
habitat blocks that can be maintained in their area, and the necessary connections between those blocks to be preserved
or protected. C ommunity planners should also woe. with State and local transportation planning erddres, and planners
from other communities, to roster coordination and cooperation in developing compatible developmerd plans to ensure
wildlife hablatconnectroitv The Departments guidelines tot incorporating wildlife considerations into community
planning and development can be found on the Wndlte Friendly Guidelines portion ofthe Wildlife Planning page at
hfinclAwwu a,a[d corn uvtl,il nrnMMeeldldegu dehnesl.
Design culverts to rrinmiize impacts to channel geometry, or design channel geometry (low tow, overbark. Aoodplais)
and substrates to carry expected discharge using local drainages of appropriate size as templates R educe minimize
barriers to slow movement of ampMbians offish( a. 9, el"ifle falls). Also tot tot rest ialvaldlAe, washes and stream
corridors often provide inportuntcorridots for movement. Overal culvertwidth, height and Iengthshould be optmized
tot movement of the greatest number and diversity of species expected to utilize the passage. Culvert designs should
consider moisture. light and noise, whit providing clear views at both ends to maximize utilization- For rmarlysptoits,
fencing is an important design feature that can be uttized with culverts to funnel wildide into these areas and rnWmize
the potential for roadway collisions. Guidelines for culvert designs to tacildate wildfire passage can be found on the hone
page of this application at htips f_ MAwwxznfd_corr.Mhildlrrapl nrnng uiid R guidelinesf
Based on the project type entered, coordrnationwith Arizona Department of Environmental Quality may be required
Based on the project type entered, coordrnabonwAh.Arizona Department of Nnlater Resources may be required
(htttpl. ,u o+ Azi,valikf govia-nirtldefa httac „1
Based on the project type entered, coordination rwdh U S Army l ofps of Engineermay be required
Vain fact ii
MA"TyyrLeg Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
W LB No. 116028-A-001
Part I — Inventory & Analysis
Arizona Game & Fish Dept. Letter (cont'd)
Arizona Game and Fah Department project ieport_shannon 80 21093 21602 pdf
Project ID. HGIS04865 Review Date. IZM5Q01603.4016 PM
Based on lie project type entered, coordination w,rth County F lood Control districts) may be required
Development plate should provide for open natural space for wildlife movement, while also minimizing the potential for
wildlife -human interactions through design features Please contact Project Evaluation Program for more information on
living with urban wildlife at PEPQazatd oov or
at hftrig LkmA._a, a dd co milovil ditteini an ninaku iidIR o Litil hne51 and httrs vror—afd_corr.MlddhtelLiuv,allUith
Vegetation restoration projects (including treatments of invasive or exotic species) should have a completed =rte-
evaluation plan (identifying environmental conditions necessary to to. establish native vegetatronj, a rev egetaLon plan
(species, density, method of establishment,, a short and longterm monitoring plan, including adaptive managernent
guidelines to address needs for replacement vegetation
Project Location andior Species Recommendations
HDMS records indicate that one or more listed, proposed, or candidate species or Critical Habitat (Des ignated or
Proposed) have been documented in the vicinity of your project The Endangered Species Act (ESA) gives the US F ah
and Wildlife Service(USFW S) regulatory authority over all tederally hsted species Please contact USFWS Ecological
Services Offices at /Air-ifin hms�ggy1southivectfasim izu uor
Phoenix Man Office
2321 W. Royal Palm Rd. Suite 103
Phoenix. AZ 85021
Phone: OM-242.0210
Fax: 602.242.2513
Tucson Sub -Office
201 N. Bonita Suite 141
Tucson, AZ 85745
Phone 520.670-6144
Fax 520-870.6155
Flagstaff Sub -Office
SW Forest Science Complex
2WO S. Pine Knoll Dr
Flagstaff, AZ 860D1
Phone: 92& 55& 2157
Fax 928-556-2121
HDMS records indicate that Sonoran Desert Tortoise have been documented within the vicnity of your project area
Please review the Tortoise Handling Guidehnes found at h ins Auumw afd o Lvddl/elnon lamemanaaemertftorto�el
HDMS records indicate that Lesser Long -nos ed Bats have been documented within the vicinity of your project area
Please review the Lesser Long nosed Bat Management Guidelines
at e=R I !vvldh Jnl nninaF �rAro lit R F ti milli •nil mes1FINA Ie Ha ,I iln edf
Analysis indicates that your project is located in the vicinity of an i dentified wildlife habitat ltrdt age corridor Project
planning and imp lementatror, efforts should focus or, maintaining adequate opportunities for wildlife permeabihtq. For
information pertaining to the I,H,age assessment andutnldidespeaes that may be affected, please refer to
http Mrig_ro co endorde=rg_n '�go na Please contact your local Ancona C ame and Fah Department R egional Office for
specific project recornmendatron:
-
pay 110111
yTh Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
Group v" WLB No. 116028-A-001
Part I — Inventory & Analysis
7. Viewsheds
Due to the relatively flat character of the project site, the perimeter areas are the only locations of high visibility
from adjacent roadways and properties. The areas of higher vegetation densities along the site perimeter
reduce visibility into and across the property.
A. For proposals within the Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District and/or Oracle Road Scenic Corridor
Overlay District, provide a Viewshed Analysis as defined in Section 27.10.D.3.f.iv.o.1.
The subject property does not fall within either Overlay district.
B. For proposals within the Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District and/or Oracle Road Scenic Corridor
Overlay District, provide a View Preservation Plan (VPP) for nonresidential developments that meet the
criteria defined in Section 27.10.D.3.f.iv.2.
Not Applicable
C. For proposals within the Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District and/or Oracle Road Scenic Corridor
Overlay District, map and identify all Core Character Vegetation (CCV), in accordance with Section
2 7. 10. D. 3.f. iv. b.
Not Applicable
Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
WLB No. 116028-A-001
Part I — Inventory & Analysis
8. Traffic
A. Connection to Arterial Roadway Network
Access to the project site will be from Shannon Road. The proposed access point aligns with the existing
intersection of Sahuaro Divide and Shannon Road.
B. Arterial Roadways within One Mile of the Property
i. Existing and proposed right-of-way widths. See tables below.
ii. Whether or not said widths conform to Oro Valley minimum requirements. See tables below.
iii. Ownership (public or private). See tables below.
iv. Whether or not rights -of -way jog or are continuous. See tables below.
V. Number of travel lanes, theoretical capacity and design speed for existing streets. See tables below.
vi. Present Average Daily Traffic (ADT) for existing streets. See tables below.
vii. Describe surface conditions on existing streets providing access to the site. See tables below.
viii. Program for completion of roadway and intersection improvements. See tables below.
Road Segment:
Shannon Road to
La Cholla Boulevard
La Cholla Blvd. to
La Canada
Existing ROW:
.......... -.......................................... ------------------------------ --- -----
150,
--------------.......----------.....----.....-----..........-.-..
150,
- -- -............. --................ ......... .........
Ultimate ROW:
----------------
---------- 150'
--
150'
Travel Lanes:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -- --...-----------------------------------------.--- - ---
------------..-........2
--------------..........----.........----...---- ..-..---- ............ .....
2
Theoretical Capacity*:
..............................................................----------------
--------------------..........----.........--------.....-......
15 040
. - -- - - - -- .-..-.. - ---------------------------
.._._-..................----....... _..--------•- ......----•_---------
15 040
-------------------------------------------- ...-----..-..-----------.----------
ADT (PAG 2014):
..........................................................._..................-.-_•-----------......_..._......------------------------------------
5,098
----------------------....--
7,714
- - ........ - - - ....------.
Speed Limit:
.................................................................-----------
. 35
45
Condition:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----............- ---•
Paved
............ -....... --............... ................. .-----------..--------------.......
-----...---------.... ................. -................ -............. --
--Paved
Scheduled Improvements:
Completed 2015
-- --.----..............------................................ - ... ..-- - -
None Scheduled
Road Segment:
Naranja to
Lambert Lane
Existing ROW:
... .. ... .................................._......---..........--------------------
60'
.................. ... .-----............................. -................. .
Ultimate ROW:
150'
----------------........................._...------------------ -- ........--
Travel Lanes:
.................................................................... ................
...................... .......................................... ......_....
2
Theoretical Capacity*:
.. ......... ................. ... -- ----------------
......... -.... -... _..--... ........................................... .........
.......... 15,040
- -.....
ADT (PAG 2013):
.................................... - - ---
---------------------- .. 7,366
Speed Limit:
.... ........................................................................... .....-..........
45
Condition:
....... ...... _...-----.....
.......-----------------....................................................
Paved
---------------------------------------------
Scheduled Improvements:
--------------............---------------------------...........
Scheduled 2018-2020
Naranja to
Tangerine
150'
---........ -........... -- ....................................
150'
_- ........ -------------- --
2
- ........ .... .......----------------------------
---1----5,040
-
-----------------------------------------------
8,723
............. -........ ......-......................... --._.....
45
-------------------------- ----------------------- ------
-
Paved
..........................................................
Scheduled 2018-2020
SIN"
Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
WLB No. 116028-A-001
ix
x
Part 1— Inven
& Analysis
Road Segment:
Shannon Rd. to
La Cholla Blvd.
Thornydale Rd. to
Shannon Rd.
Existing ROW:
............. ................................. .............. _............ -... -.......... -----
150'
------.....--------------------............--------------...---------------------------....
60'-150'
---------------------------------------....------.....-...__.......... _..........
Ultimate ROW:
.....................................
150'
150'
.............................
Travel Lanes:
2
-----------------.------ -- _....
--- .... ........ .................
.... 2
------------*--.-..---------------
Theoretical Capacity
------------------------------------------ - - -- - ......--....................------..............................----------...............-----------...-.-.------
-------------
15,040
--------- .....................-----...........---------------....------------.
15,040
-----------.....---..............-----------------------.--- - ..... _.._....
ADT (PAG 2015):
-------------------------------------------------------------- - ......
6,228
.................. .........................-------------......----..._..
3,826
---------------------------�._-.._._.�
Speed Limit:
45
45
-....-..--------..........:..................-----
Condition:
--------------------------_- .......------------.........._.......- - -
Paved
-__..........-----.....................---------------------------------. -
Paved
......................................._.....----------...........--------------------
Scheduled Improvements:
......
None Scheduled
------------------------------------------------ -----........ ----
None Scheduled
Road Segment:
Naranja Drive. to
Lambert Lane
Lambert Lane to Overton
Road
Existing ROW:
.......... -............................................................ --... - ............... ---
150'
--............... _—............................... ... -.............. ------........
150'
.............................. ---...................... ............................... ..-
Ultimate ROW:
............... -...................................... -----..... -...... -... -........... ...
150'
-----........-----.------------------------------....._...........---------------....------------------------------------------.
150'
................... ...---.._.......
Travel Lanes:
2
2
........ ..................................................................................... ....
Theoretical Capacity*:
.............................................................. _.... ......................... ....
................. -................................................... ..........................
15,040
----------------- ...... - .............-----------------------._.....------------........---------------........---------
......................................................... _.-...... -
15,040
-----------
ADT (PAG 2014):
.......................................................... ...................... ---..............
2,805
....... ----..... _......................................... ........ --........................
4,798
.....-- ............. ..... ... - - ---
Speed Limit:
45
45
............ ........................ -........ -.......... -...... ---........ -.... -...........
Condition:
.-................. -----....... .................................. -............ -...........
Paved
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------......------------------------------ ----- - - --
Paved
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scheduled Improvements:
---------
None Scheduled
---. - - - - - - - - - ...-.
None Scheduled
*Theoretical capacity based on City of Peoria, TIA Criteria Table 4 assuming a L.O.S. "C".
Please refer to Exhibit 1-8-A: Transportation.
Existing and proposed intersections on arterials within 1 mile of the site most likely to be used by traffic
from the site.
Arterial intersections within one mile of the site that will likely carry traffic generated by this
development include Shannon Road and Lambert Lane, Thornydale Road and Lambert Lane, Naranja
Drive and La Cholla Boulevard, La Cholla and Lambert Lane, and La Cholla and Tangerine Boulevard.
Existing bicycle and pedestrian ways adjacent to the site and their connections with arterial streets,
parks and schools.
A half mile east of the subject property, there is a signed bike route with a striped shoulder along La
Cholla Boulevard that extends from Lambert Lane to Tangerine Road. There is also a signed bike route
with striped bike lane along Tangerine Road. These routes provide connectivity to Casas Church and
Christian School, and numerous neighborhoods to the East of La Cholla Boulevard. Two shared -use
paths are also within proximity of the site located along Naranja Drive extending from Shannon Road
to La Canada Drive along La Cholla Boulevard, north of Naranja Drive. These shared use paths provided
connections to additional bike routes, notably the Canada Hills Drive bike route and the Naranja Drive
bike route.
Refer to Exhibit 1-8-A: Transportation.
V171 t f
•
Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
WLB No. 116028-A-001
Part I — Inventory & Analysis
9. Recreation / Trails
A. Trails, Parks and Recreation Areas within One Mile of the Property
There are no neighborhood parks within one mile of the subject property. The El Conquistador Country
Club is a public golf course that offers 36-holes of golf and is located approximately % of a mile to the east
of the project site. West Lambert Lane Park is just over one mile southeast of the project site. Multi -use
pathways are located along Naranja Drive, extending from Shannon Road to La Canada Drive and along La
Cholla Boulevard, north or Naranja Drive.
Park Name:
Park Size (in Acres)
Park Type (Active of Passive)
El Conquistador Country Club
252±
Active
West Lambert Lane Park
40±
Passive
Refer to Exhibit 1-9-A: Trails, Parks & Recreation.
r Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
µ
Groupv" WLB No. 116028-A-001
Part I — Inventory & Analysis
10. Schools
A. Schools within One Mile of the Property
Ironwood Ridge High School is located immediately north of the subject property. Wilson K-8 School is
of a mile to the north. Casas Christian School neighbors the subject property to the east.
Refer to Exhibit 1-10-A: Existing & Proposed Schools.
B. Schools Expected to Serve the Project
Shannon 80 is located within the Amphitheater Public School District. Existing schools in the District that
may serve this project include:
• Ironwood Ridge High School located immediately north of the subject property. The school
accommodates 9th through 12th grades
• Wilson K-8 school located to the north of the project site. The school accommodates Kindergarten
through 8th grades.
• Copper Creek Elementary School located 2.5 miles northeast of the subject property. The school
accommodates Kindergarten through 5th grades.
• Casas Christian School to the east of the property. The school accommodates Kindergarten through
8th grades.
• Basis Oro Valley, a charter school not part of Amphi School District, located 4 miles east. The school
accommodates Kindergarten through 12th grades.
7ry� Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
WP WLB No. 116028-A-001
Part I — Inventory & Analysis
11. Water
A. Water Service Provider
This project falls within the Oro Valley water service area. The closest water main is a 12" line near the
intersection of Naranja Drive and Shannon Road. The exact nature of necessary offsite improvements will
be determined during the platting process, and will be the financial responsibility of the developer.
B. Other Information
Tucson Water abuts the site to the west and to the south. There is a 16" transmission main within Shannon
Road and a 6" line to the south of the property serving the existing residential areas.
��yy Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
1N" WLB No. 116028-A-001
Part I — Inventory & Analysis
12. Wastewater
A. Sewer Service Connection
There is an existing 8" PVC sewer line and manhole to the east of the property (G-97-129). Based on
sewer depth and existing site topography it is estimated that the site can be serviced by gravity sewer to
that location.
Refer to Exhibit 1-12-A: Sewer Service.
Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
M-UMBWLB No. 116028-A-001
Part I — Inventory & Analysis
13. Exhibits
P��%� Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
ow AMB WLB No. 116028-A-001
31
NARANJA DR
o
O � 1
z - I
Q IRONWOOD
_ 4 RIDGE:
HIGH SCHOOL
�e
SAHUARO
DIVIDE
i
IV D
9 Q
<
ll.l
J
J
d
Q
F
O
0
a
LL
O
O
Z
3:
O
Z
O
�
z
SUBJECT
PROPERTY
1 :I
�E
CASAS
CHURCH
fps
Exhibit 1-1-B ® 01 500'
Aerial Photo
The Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
Gr
oup WLB No. 116028-A-001
0
MILE FROM
NARANJA DR
PROJECT SITE
.000
1
� I
Z SUBJECT
O I
Z PROPERTY
I =
I U
I �
z
O
U IQ W
I Z J
a ¢ I
1 0 >
F O /
0
O
LL /
a O
` O �
U O /
Z�
z
Rural Low Density Residential (0-0.3 DU/AC)
Low Density Residential (0.4-1.2 DU/AC)
Medium Density Residential (2.1-5 DU/AC)
Public/Semi Public
School
Master Planned Community
Exhibit 1-1-C ® 0. 700'
Existing General Plan Land Use Designations
The Shannon 80 -Rezoning Site Analysis
Group_ WLB No. 116028-A-001
R1-144
Single Family Residential
(Oro Valley)
R1-20
R1-36 Single Family Residential
Single Family (Oro Valley)
Residential
(Oro Valley)
MILE FROM
_ _ _ _ _PROJECT SITE
NARANJA DR
.000
/ o �
Z
Z R1-7
Z Single Family
= Residential
ro (Oro Valley)
1
I
I
I �
SR I
I Suburban SUBJECT
Ranch
I (Pima County) PROPERTY
I I ]Residential
Single
II I I
I ro Valley)
Z I
D I
1 Ov w
Q J ,
Q
a >
O 0O
a- Z
Z °0011
z /
R1-144
Single Family Residential
(Oro Valley)
CXnlblt I-7 —V ® 0' 700'
Existing Zoning
The Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis ,
c ow WLB No. 116028-A-001
a
MILE FROM
PROJECT SITE
`\ --� — ---_ �NARANJADR---_ __— —�
w
Ironwood Ridge
/ Q x High School'Y
_ The Estates a
2.47apella
DU/Ac.
I Single Family
Residential f
SUBJECT vacant
I PROPERTY
Casas
.� Church
Single Famliy`
Residential
1 Q J
o Df Po Single Family _
o Residential s
o. o
o ,o
z
Existing Land Uses
The
WLGroup
Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
WLB No. 116028-A-001
ESLO Critical Resource Area (t7 Acres)
ESLO Core Resource Area (t24 Acres)
NARANJA DR - ESLO Resource Management Area Tier 1
(t46 Acres)
ESLO Resource Management Area Tier 2
Allow
a
Z
0
Z SUBJECT
Q
(n PROPERTY
Z
D
0
Q W
o >
0
O L
a 0
IX Z
O
L-L) O
_Z
Z
Exhibit 1-2-A m 0, 500'
Environmentally Sensitive Lands
The
WLB
Group-
M
Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
WLB No. 116028-A-001
4
2
Exhib
NARANJA DR-
' r ( f • v,.+ � � � n^ ,a w.r � R { 1.1 � l { w 7� T � 1 � S � -" -`^`., ✓u /i � � -w ti � L i �! � ? � r" "" `.' -_ , ^ � T .tr�d
i 6 S 2670 %+ 4� +1,�(�lr�..�- "ti .�.5 r. 1�..� ` "•� 6 `"Z ; -.� ,r> > ��� ��a► �`.+ �^ " J
yw { P % l r 7 fy/�
/�Lf 4f
i t 'r
Z, ✓n�`TyrA�Y1T�y✓lit � f � tJ�����r�}y �r� ✓�T C� �'fti.r����/, � y�� �.
° 2660 L45 ?�L r5la�alj iL, - ■�y�{1 LJ� �� //
�.� a '�I�iLl
X.r:�� `+ a r la✓�� �J�
rr�
2650-+. >W S�� LOL �` *t{ 1.�rJ1} �/ f�C n�-�__�.' r"L r✓ J ~e .•� 5 � r.t�.� i"I
`Z i ` -..,_ ,.,.✓S j ✓d � 4 � r.,,"'� {`!` F� �.�'1 f• "r t'`�� d � f �
AfZ �.�- ^ `f-1•'�t l L'. �'��
} • f rz ' i rr, � r ✓ (� f-•'' ` ' ✓ f �, `r}i7 y r �
►• 3 � ti;� f t'Y ,, ti '�. L} P ....r1�1 � { �., f t mil) t'l}e,�,�R�7 � r y �,� }�„a,r� �•I1'► r ��
jt rq
r `2640;��b I; �Y `)&?rf rt°�� f (1; J (91 ?� gs��
/>•) 7) 4 YL `a P f f d4.g r � ALr
fs
� ¢�� i� tcb t"�� ?L}f11 J 3 \ fJNr ,L 4✓ a✓�? sL
��' s SUBJECT � r
��� tt�JAPROPERTY
L����
/"fr
�t'tif { `f "L7�a 4 �� 4..�► � "� �i r Ir'
4+. � rrFP tir ,t
t{
ty h srJ �`'� Y ?i^\.F1' r �. � Z r> � � !$ ii^••( { ,,,e` L-.s r �r ti �
�,e 1,
{ ��m.rr�^•. r...?,, H' 1` 41^`.,} y�� q,t i b �-k
t`2630••
JL �i • .W -.+ Z L• R o \.,• fy yy T2 m 1 a'!" .1 Y1. ? GJ.� ' �1'l�L {
4y
I Sya� ti r i4 y; j�� i rr , i✓ti t o- y� i^yw # Aj a ^. ,,� 1 ^ i 1
U JIB Ny1 H 1jRR f 1-•." /i \ ..tt' s �� ^r L y-n 1
Q4 �� N �'4 ' J f {.t i.�J\"i',�3 `, �M1 f t^�( ^,'1 `g �ti ✓/ ��.. a �....,y y P, '��1� �,% { i� -
>
a OQ,b 2620� r k-1
��
0
Z
�' i y�`i }1 (r —=+ti�� t s �i �0.0 ns �r �lr a�f t h Z✓ �1 t �t �f
U Q f �t ��t f� S`Ll cn-' ~��� r✓ �1I 1 t Ivf�l 1 �,,5t'/7� 1QS a�
U H a r" G 1' 11l z
f
261a f� f nu 9 f�l✓ F i ( %+ �t s� "s�, f:I[ n> } 2 �Z� r' y�v
y ti r '`E L✓;^ � .s • '� s� ' i i .` j' �. j 1... r �.nr. z �,{
-tl ; yr^ r4 y1 a "i j BLS✓ t' �'W~� f� w "�v��t��� r� jf h�
tiffs 1,
i� p �� s °r� ti� � a i� l d✓ 7 ~�� �' S J I n f� p ,F�' �r.��.,,. t�
avx c- y � � Try rat � 'i''`,,, i"'t
rr t �� \ \ j i�!)t sr\r t i} E '*,�
r r c N) t 1, r �` 7•�• "` w✓ T b �j°' w r(!� o yeti ��y1 j 14
'2 �� �✓fr �� ... � r Us n .. !: .�?�� d(� � S �., i, t� � >r jai � �^mot 1 TSr 4 � j J,'`...♦
it 1-3 -A m o soo,
Topogra
The WM
WLB
Group_
Contour Interval = 2 Ft
Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
WLB No. 116028-A-001
Exhibit 1-5-A
Offsite Watersheds N.T.S.
The Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
c o vu. WLB No. 116028-A-001
FEMA FLOODPLAIN ZONE W
NARANJA DR
�
ti,
100 YEAR LOCAL FLOODPLAIN
d
2670�
.�.�
GENERAL FLOW DIRECTION
EXISTING CULVERT
Z
z'
-2660
a
a
2650
640,
WASH A
`
WASH B,
Rs fit.
SUBJECT
�
PROPERTY
f
'�
2630
�-
EXISTING
0 CULVERTS
/2620 3x12" PIPES�
a a
o
s(�
0 0
o-
0 0
Z �- I . - /T-I
Z
2610
hit 1-5-8
Onsite Hydrology Characteristics
The
WLB
Group
m 0, 500'
Contour Interval = 2 Ft.
In 6mmm?m"
Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
WLB No. 116028-A-001
NOTE:
40
41
42
NARANJA DR
IRONWOOD
RIDGE
HIGH SCHOOL
0 40
Z
Z
SUBJECT
PROPERTY co
CASAS
ANHOL
4685-04 CHURCH
z
O
w 8.
J
d
W 0
F X
O
a O
Z
O 3:
U O
Z
7
Exhibit 1-12-A Ill 0, 600'
Existing Sewer Service m
The 1147 M Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
cog iii� WLB No. 116028-A-001
00e
NARANJA DR
0
Z
0
Z
Z
U)
....... ...............
................. .
V
...........
..........
■
SUBJECT
PROPERTY
Z
2630
<
W
................... ................... ............. .........
W
<
>
6.
<
0
Of
C�—
0
LL
0
Z
1
0
�:
0
0
ESLO Critical Resource Area
Z
Z
ESLO Core Resource Area
ESLO Resource Management Area Tier 1
—FEMA Floodplain Zone'A'
100 Year Floodplain
General Flow Direction
-71
High Visibility
C- Dense Vegetation
Exhibit
1-13-A
m
0, 500,
McHarg Composite Ma
The -IF
WLB IF -If -M Group A
Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
WLB No. 116028-A-001 C
Part 11 — Land Use Plan
Part II — Land Use Plan
M7yy�g Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
- WLB No. 116028-A-001
Part 11— Land Use Plan
(This page intentionoll�j blonh)
Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
MAMBWLB No. 116028-A-001
Part 11 — Land Use Plan
1. Land Uses
A. Project Description
This request is to rezone the subject property from R1-144 to R1-36. The project proposes a low density
cluster residential subdivision with 1.0 DU/AC, consisting of 80 single-family detached homes on 76.4+/-
acres. Most of the lots will have a minimum size of 70' x 125', though the home sizes will vary. A row of
lots closest to Shannon Road will be a minimum of one third acre in order to reduce the visual impact of
this development. The architectural design of the homes will be consistent with surrounding residential
developments and will adhere to the Town of Oro Valley Design Guidelines. They will be constructed out
of materials such as stucco, adobe, and wood frame, and will have either a gabled, tiled or flat roof.
Property line walls will meet the Town of Oro Valley Design Guidelines, and landscape treatments and
design will utilize native desert vegetation.
Refer to Exhibit II-1-A: Tentative Development Plan.
B. General Plan Conformance
The proposed development of the property is consistent with the General Plan, as it will maintain a balance
among the variety of uses and characteristics of the area. First, the development will preserve significant
open spaces, will comply with the ESLO, and will provide appropriate bufferyards and density transition
between land uses. Next, this development will also bring new, quality housing to an area located in close
proximity to several activity centers including two public schools, three churches, a private school, and a
golf course. Finally, the development will allow for appropriate and sensitive infill to a growing area of Oro
Valley.
C. Flexible Design Options / Conservation Subdivision Design
As part of this rezoning application, the subject property seeks to utilize some of the Flexible Development
provisions available as part of the site's compliance with the Environmentally Sensitive Lands Ordinance
(ESLO) (Section 27.10.F.2.c).
ESL Incentives Request:
ZONING INCENTIVES Section 27.101
(a) Building Setbacks
(b) Landscape Buffer Yards
(c) Minimum Lot Size
(d) Minimum Lot Width
(e) Alternative Parking Analysis
(f) Building Height
(g) Open Space
(h) Mixed Use
(i) Modified Review Process
(J) Recreation Area Credit
(k) Native Vegetation Preservation
Section 2 7. 10. F. 2. b — Applicability
i. The following design options may be applied to property or portions of property when ESOS
is applied to twenty-five (25%) or more of a project site, except as provided herein.
Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
WLB No. 116028-A-001
Part 11— Land Use Plan
ESOS Total for site = 66%
(a) Building Setbacks: Per Section 27.10(F)(2)(a) — We request that the side setbacks be reduced to no less
than five (5) feet, front setbacks shall be reduced to no less than ten (10) feet for the use of side entry
garages and non -garage elements only, and the rear setbacks be reduced to fifteen (15) feet —
consistent with zoning districts with comparable lot sizes. This request will not result in an on -lot
driveway length of less than twenty (20) feet. This request will allow for a residential subdivision to
incorporate more diverse details and massing conditions, which will lead to a more attractive and varied
streetscape.
(c) Minimum Lot Size: Per Section 27.10(F)(2)(c) —We request the ability to reduce the minimum lot size
to no less than 8,750 square feet. The reduction in lot size allows for the clustering of development,
an instrumental element of the Conservation Subdivision Design. Lot Size Reduction allows for the
maximization of contiguous protected open space, as well as reduce the amount and improve the
efficiency of necessary, critical infrastructure systems.
(d) Minimum Lot Width: Per Section 27.10(F)(2)(d) — We request the ability to reduce the minimum lot
width to 70 feet.
(f) Building Height: Per Section 27.10(F)(2)(f) — We request the ability to raise the building height limit of
18 feet (per the R1-36 zoning), to 23 feet for single -story gable -roofed residences only. The increase
in in building height allows the future developer/builder to meet the current market demands of
homebuyers wants and needs in terms of both living space and design, while adequately providing
enough pitch for structural integrity and drainage. The building height in reference to this request is
appropriate due to the significant buffer area provided in the project.
(g) Open Space: Per Section 27.10(F)(2)(g) — We request the ability to reduce the required open space of
the Resource Management Area 1 by 25% percent in exchange for preserving more than the required
amount of Critical (96%) and Core (97%) Resources.
(j) Recreation Area Credit: Per Section 27.10(F)(2)(j) — We request the use of the Recreation Area Credit
to allow for passive and active recreational amenities located within resource management area 1. The
proposed rec area meets the locational requirements and criteria outlined in Section 26.5.
(k) Native Vegetation Preservation: Per Section 27.10(F)(2)(k) — We request the right to waive the
requirements for native plant salvage and mitigation within the development envelope. The site
contains —66% ESOS, exceeding the 50% minimum requirement. This modification cannot be applied
to areas of distinct vegetation which are designated as a core resource area or native plants that are
considered threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act or highly safeguarded by the
Arizona Department of Agriculture.
D. Effect on Existing Land Uses
Since the subject property is currently vacant, there will be no negative impact to existing land uses.
Developing this property as single-family residential will unify existing neighborhoods, increase the sense
of community, and provide needed housing in a rapidly growing area of town.
Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
91IMM WLB No. 116028-A-001
Part 11— Land Use Plan
2. Environmentally Sensitive Lands
A. ESOS Selection & Preservation Methods
This project will be in conformance with the ESL guidelines of the Zoning Code. The site plan provides 50.5±
acres of ESOS (66% of the site) and it avoids the existing three washes and associated Critical Resource
Areas except for necessary roadway and utility crossings. The designated Critical Resource Areas crossing
project site will be preserved with 96% open space. The Core Resource Areas will be preserved with 97%
open space. The remaining Resource Management Area Tier 1 will contain all of the lots, and will preserve
45% open space. The onsite ESOS areas maintain open space connectivity within and beyond the project
site, and will allow for minimal impact to wildlife movement. These ESOS areas along the southern (300'-
600') and western (300'-450') edges will be permanently protected within an open space easement to be
granted to the Town. Additionally, any vegetation that is disturbed will meet the mitigation requirements
as set forth in the Town of Oro Valley Zoning Code.
TrLPh Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
ilia 8,t WLB No. 116028-A-001
Part fl — Land Use Plan
3. Topography
A. Design Response to Site Topography
Due to the relatively flat character of the subject property and the lack of challenging topographic
constraints, the development of this property can proceed without special grading considerations.
B. Slope Encroachment
The subject property does not contain any regulated 15% or greater slopes, and as such there are no areas
of encroachment.
C. Hillside Conservation Areas
There are no Hillside Conservation Areas on the subject property.
D. Quantified Site Disturbance
Approximately 30.6± acres (40.1%) of the site will be developed/unrestored, and 45.8 acres (59.9%) of the
site will be left in its natural condition or restored condition. Approximately 3.7± acres (4.8%) of the graded
area will be revegetated with native vegetation and will become landscaped common area, and the 1 acre
rec area abutting the CRA will be improved and credited towards RMA1 per Town Code Section 27.10.E.3.c
bringing the effective open space area to approximately 50.5± acres (66%).
Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
i`LA" WLB No. 116028-A-001
Part II — Land Use Plan
4. Cultural / Archaeological / Historic Resources
A. Resource Protection
If any cultural resources are discovered during construction, State and local rules will be followed regarding
the handling and treatment of such cultural resources.
B. Treatment Plan
The project site has been surveyed for cultural resources by Westland Resources, and the report has been
submitted to the Town for review. No significant cultural resources meeting the Arizona or the National
Register of Historic Places eligibility criteria have been found on the property. In the unlikely event that
cultural resources are uncovered during construction, a professional archaeologist will evaluate the
exposed material before any work continues in the area of the discovery. If any human remains or funerary
objects are discovered during the construction of this project, all work will stop within the area of the
remains and all such discoveries will be treated in accordance with Arizona Revised Statute §41-865
P411 Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
P WLB No. 116028-A-001
Part 11 — Land Use Plan
5. Hydrology
A. Design Response to Site Hydrology
The low density nature of this development will have a minimal impact on the hydrological characteristics
of the site. Additionally this project will incorporate appropriate mitigation measures in accordance with
the Town of Oro Valley Floodplain Management Code and the Drainage Criteria Manual.
B. Modifications of Drainage Patterns
There is one federally mapped floodplain crossing the northwest corner of the site located in FEMA
floodplain Zone A with a 1% annual chance of flood.
Minimal encroachment into the existing drainage patterns on site will occur. The project includes three
crossings into the mapped local floodplains only where necessary to provide access to the site. There will
also be slight encroachment into the FEMA floodplain at the entrance of the site where it aligns with the
existing intersection of Sahuaro Divide and Shannon Road. The low density nature of the existing offsite
upstream development allows most drainage to flow in its natural state. Offsite flows from upstream
watersheds will for the most part be allowed to flow in their natural state. Excess runoff created by this
development will be collected in detention basins, channels and/or culverts directing the runoff through
the project site, and will be metered out at less than pre -developed flows for the local non-FEMA
floodplains. This development will attenuate pre-existing storm water flow rates by 15%-25%. Basins onsite
are to be owned and maintained by the HOA. Drainage will be designed in such away to provide all-weather
access to each lot within the proposed subdivision.
C. Mitigation
Drainage design within the proposed development will convey offsite and onsite flows using constructed
channels, storm drain pipes, and onsite detention basins in accordance with the Town of Oro Valley
Floodplain Management Code and the Drainage Criteria Manual. Channel and basin geometry and
construction will follow accepted standards regarding erosion and flow velocity control as well as
maintenance access. Horizontal elements constructed within the project will be set at or near existing
grade so as to minimize impacts to existing drainage patterns. Finished floor elevations will be set to one
foot above the established base flood elevations of adjacent floodplains. Lots will be graded according to
Town standards, which will provide adequate room and grades to handle stormwater runoff. In order to
mitigate for existing flooding issues adjacent to the project, an easement will be provided for maintenance
improvements to Owl Vista Place. Improvements along Owl Vista Place will include larger culverts,
armoring the road, and raising the road in flood prone areas.
D. Town Policy Conformance
Town policy requires all development to conform to "critical basin" requirements and not result in any
adverse impacts for adjacent or downstream property owners. The Town Engineer has determined that
this development should detain more than the stormwater runoff increase created by development, thus
reducing the flows exiting the southern property boundary. As such, not only will this development avoid
adverse impacts to downstream properties, it will actually benefit them by reducing existing flooding issues
south of the project.
Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
RLIPULBWLB No. 116028-A-001
Part 11— Land Use Plan
6. Wildlife
A. Mitigation
This development will preserve a minimum 96% of the onsite Critical Resource Areas crossing the site in
the wash areas. These areas will be designated as open space and will maintain open space connectivity
within and beyond the project site, which will allow for uninterrupted wildlife movement. Additionally,
Core Resource Areas on the southern portion of the site will remain largely undeveloped serving as a buffer
between the proposed project and its neighbors to the south, while at the same time, providing open space
for the movement of wildlife.
Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
-IN" WLB No. 116028-A-001
Part 11— Land Use Plan
7. Viewsheds
A. Design Response to Site Viewsheds
With the subject property being relatively flat, the internal roadway network and homesites within this
project will minimally disturb viewsheds. Expansive bufferyards of approximately 300' t0 600' will be
provided along the southern and western boundaries of the property to help mitigate views into the site
from Shannon Road and Owl Vista Place. The proposed building height is 23 feet, and development will be
limited to one story homes.
B. ORSCOD / TRCOD Conformance
This property does not fall within the Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District (TRCOD) and/or Oracle
Road Scenic Corridor Overlay District (ORSCOD).
The Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
8rLouup WLB No. 116028-A-001
Part 11— Land Use Plan
8. Traffic
A. Traffic Impact Analysis
Provide a traffic analysis report to include:
i. The proposed internal circulation and access to/from arterial streets, explaining location and
rationale for placement.
The subject property will have one ingress/egress point that will connect this neighborhood directly
to Shannon Road. Access to the project site will align with the existing intersection of Sahuaro
Divide and Shannon Road.
ii. If off -site road improvements are required, indicate which roads and time frame for improvements.
The following off -site road improvements will be installed to reflect the traffic analysis and
agreement with neighbors:
Northbound and southbound left -turn lanes on Shannon Road at the project entrance
(Shannon Road/ Sahuaro Divide intersection).
Southbound left -turn lane at the Shannon Road/ Owl Vista Place intersection.
iii. Projected ADTfor internal circulation system at build out and level of service to all streets. Include
a projection of traffic volumes and capacity analysis for intersections.
When fully completed, the proposed Shannon 80 development is predicted to generate an
additional 856 vehicle trips per day (vtpd) on weekdays to the adjacent street system from the new
project site. Fifty percent of these new trips (428 vehicle trips) will be into the project and fifty
percent will be out of the project.
iv. Impact to existing development abutting off -site streets.
All intersections adjacent to the subject property currently operate and are predicted to continue
to experience an adequate level of service (LOS) for all movements on weekday and weekend peak
hours.
v. Capacity analyses for proposed internal and off -site streets, including right-of-way and pavement
widths, geometrics, design speeds and traffic control improvements needed.
Shannon Road
Shannon Road is a two-lane paved arterial road with a posted speed limit of 45 mph. The existing
and ultimate right-of-way is 150 feet, which is continuous. According to the Pima Association of
Governments (PAG) 2014 Traffic Volumes, the average daily trip volume (ADT) for this arterial
roadway between Lambert Lane and Naranja Drive ranges from 2,702 to 2,908 ADT. Using a 2%
growth rate as used in the Traffic Impact Analysis the 2018 volumes are estimated to range from
2,983 to 3,211 ADT, which is roughly 20% of the roadway's theoretical capacity..
YMMBShannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
O1 P W LB No. 116028-A-001
Part 11 — Land Use Plan
vi. A description of improvements required for those streets described in sub -paragraph v. above.
Both northbound and southbound left -turn lanes at the project entrance (intersection of Shannon
Road and Sahuaro Divide) as well as a southbound left -turn lane at the intersection of Shannon
Road/ Owl Vista Place will be installed to reflect the traffic analysis and agreement with neighbors.
In addition, the developer will provide an in -lieu fee to the Town for constructing a future multi-
use path along Shannon Road.
vii. The party/agency that the applicant believes to be responsible for making necessary
improvements.
The developer will be responsible for making necessary improvements.
viii. Evidence that proposed turning movements will meet safety standards in relationship to traffic
volumes.
The proposed ingress/egress point aligned with Sahuaro Divide is located a safe distance from
neighboring intersections. Vegetation adjacent to these ingress/egress points will be maintained
to provide safe site visibility for vehicles exiting the site and will allow safe turning movements to
and from the site. The proposed residential roadways meet the Town of Oro Valley Minimum
Design Standards.
B. Proposed Rights -of -Way
The proposed roadways within this development will have a right-of-way width of 50 feet and will meet the
Town of Oro Valley Minimum Design Standards. The internal roads of this development will be private and
maintained by an HOA if gated, otherwise they will be public. The gated entry will be designed and located
a safe distance from the Shannon Road right-of-way line in order to prevent the back up of traffic onto
Shannon.
C. Proposed Pedestrian / Bicycle Circulation
the developer will provide an in -lieu fee to the Town for constructing a future multi -use path along Shannon
Road. Recent road improvements to Naranja Drive include sidewalks, a multi -use path, and a striped bike
lane. Also within the vicinity is the La Cholla Boulevard multi -use path which lies within a % mile of the site
and heads north to Glover Road.
Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
WLB No. 116028-A-001
Part 11— Land Use Plan
9. Recreation / Trails
A. Offsite Trail Access
There aren't any public or neighborhood parks located within one mile of the subject property. However,
West Lambert Lane Park is located just over a mile away. The 40 acre park provides just under one mile of
natural hiking trails. Additionally, there are approximately 3.9± miles of sidewalks and paved walking paths
that exist within one mile of the Shannon 80 property. The Oro Valley community and recreation center
also provides golf and tennis recreational facilities and is open to the public.
B. Open Space Ownership
The future HOA of this proposed development will own and maintain the common area within this project.
The open space tracts along the southern and western boundaries of the site will be permanently protected
within a conservation easement, to be granted to the Town of Oro Valley.
Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
WLB No. 116028-A-001
Part 11— Land Use Plan
10. Schools
A. Student Generation
This proposed development is expected to generate approximately 17 elementary students, 18 middle
school students, and 11 high school students (using the accepted standard student multiplier of 0.2075
elementary school students per home, 0.2197 middle school students per home, and 0.1282 high school
students per home).
B. School Capacity
According to the letter supplied by the Amphitheater School District, there is available capacity for this
proposed development.
T,% Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
Groupl" WLB No. 116028-A-001
Part 11— Land Use Plan
Amphitheater Capacity Letter
OFFICE OF LEGAL COUNSEL
(520) 696-0153
• FAX (520) ".50741
w�Mllma�wn■
r r h ! 1 . S . b • • ! e 701 W. Wcuuute Rod • Tuck a, AZ 857W • (520) 69C-5000 • IDD (520)696.5033
Ckmiunt4GLVAt'D1kmms DC mw I'L Div. 14Ed ;.QYA F-tFadB—A.tJhD 3.4.ckc kMEd S-aA.LWA
Pmadmd %t H= 0A
SUi ikN1iN:,EXf
F'snck 2:elsoe
December 22, 2016
Via email
Linda Thompson
Subdivision Coordinator
The WLB Group
4444 E Broadway
Tucson AZ 85711
RE Proposed Development of 124t single family homes
on approximately 771 acres within the Amphitheater District
Southeast corner of Naranja Drive and Shannon Road
Dear Ms. Thompson:
I am responding to your request for information regarding the capacity of
Amphitheater schools impacted by your proposed development
Using 2000 demographic multipliers developed by the U.S. Department of Census,
Bureau of Census, and adjusted for Amphitheater Districts school organizational patterns,
we project the following student populations to result from this project when built
Academic Level 124 Single FamW Homes
Elementary 3
Middle 27
High School 16
The census multipliers we use to obtain these projections are 0.2075 elementary
students per household, 0.2197 middle school students per household and 0.1282 high
school students per household.
The capacity of our schools noted below is based on our last confirmed enrollment
calculations. The schools which would be impacted by this population are listed below,
along with the physical capacity available at each school presently. Please note that these
schools will also be impacted by other developments in this area which may have already
been approved by the County but which are not yet built
Aa4htt.ww14h•CanpmddOro 14h•[rmt 4Lte[[t!
Amphthecte Mihiedo
ScJ.ad • Ccem e,io [;S School • Cton ).L 6!c Scko 1 • La Q ma )LSIt Scbod •Firm F.� Sc1wd
Cgje QeekE—mtr7•Dor�tm Eemer trT•Iinlcm£emmtJt7•[idaw�£e.emtnF.e •d,ny 17etnatar7•MwVerde £rmetGsy
1:a� £emett:r7 • Faetai 517 ilxxrsar� • Ineu Eemmtr7 • F+o Y,tu E7cmet..at7 • Miia Llancct.ry • FiLio Cmta
Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
WLB No. 116028-A-001
Amphitheater Capacity Letter (cont'd)
Part 11— Land Use Plan
Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
WLB No. 116028-A-001
Part 11 — Land Use Plan
11. Water
A. Water Demand
A reasonable estimate for domestic water usage is 230 gallons per day per lot dry weather flow. With 80
lots being proposed in this development, the total domestic water use is projected at 20,930 gallons per
day.
B. Water Service Provider & Capacity
Oro Valley Water has water service available to the property under the conditions stated in a capacity letter
received December 20`h, 2016.
Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
EL-UMBWLB No.116028-A-001
Water Service Provider Letter
> iµL AA O.
•ram►
w�VA`D[D �f•�
Oro Vallee Water Utility
December 20, 2016
WLB
4444 East Broadway
Tucson, AZ 85711
Part II — Land Use Plan
Subject: WATER AVAILABILITY
Parcel: Pima County Parcel numbers 224-21-0020, 224-21-0030, 224-21-0040,
224-21-0050
To whom it may concern
The Town of Oro Valley Water Utility currently has water service available to the
above property under the following conditions:
A Water Plan is submitted by the applicant and approved by the Water
Utility
A Line Extension Agreement is executed by the applicant.
All construction is in accordance with the approved Water Plan and the new
facilities are accepted by the Water Utility in accordance with the
requirement s of the Line Extension Agreement.
Payment of all water development impact fees, meter fees and other
required fees and charges. (A water meter for residential and/or
commercial use cannot be sold until after the issuance of an approved
building permit)
WATER SUPPLY
The Town of Oro Valley Water Utility has been designated by the State of Arizona,
Department of Water Resources, as having an Assured Water Supply (AWS No.
2003-001 Decision and Order No, 26-400765). This development lies within the
boundary of the Oro Valley Water Utility's planned water service area Once the
property is platted, it will be noted on the plat(s) for these properties that the
property meets the State requirement of an Assured Water Supply because it will
be served by Oro Valley Water Utility,
WWW.0f0ValleyaZ,&0V
11000 N La CaAada Drive • Oro Valley, Arizona 83737
Phone (520) 229.5000 •tax: (520) 229-5029
The Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
MIN" WLB No. 116028-A-001 �
Part II — Land Use Plan
`4�o v4'
Oro Valley Water 111ility
WATER SERVICE
The developer shall be required to submit a Water Plan identifying water system
improvements These include but are not limited to:
Water Use
Fire Flow Requirements
Offsite/ Onsite Water Facilities
Loops and Proposed Connection Points to Existing Water System
Easements/Common Areas
Once a Water Plan is submitted, 1t will be determined if the proposed plan can
meet the water requirements of the proposed development The developer shall
be fiscally and financially responsible for all water system improvements and
modifying/enhancing the existing water system to meet those needs. It is
recommended that the applicant contact the Water Utility to discuss the
construction of water system improvements prior to submitting a Water Plan for
the property.
This letter and the comments herein regarding water availability are valid for a
period of one year only through December 20, 2017 Issuance of this letter is not
to be construed as approval of a Water Plan and/or acceptance of any
construction for water service.
If you have any questions or would like more details regarding any construction
improvements that may be required in a Water Plan, please call me at 229-5017.
Sincerely,
Mark Moore
New Development Coordinator
cc Phillip C Saletta, P.E Water Utility Director
'A W%4.orovallcyaz.gov
11000 N la Canada Drive • Oro Valley, Arizona 85737
Phone. (520)229-5000 • fax :(520)229-5029
Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
v" WLB No. 116028-A-001
Part II — Land Use Plan
12. Wastewater
A. Sewer Service Method
Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department will provide sewer service to this
development. Capacity is currently available for this project in the public sewer G-97-129, downstream
from manhole 4685-04.
Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
WLB No. 116028-A-001
Port II — Land Use Plan
Wastewater Service Provider Letter
A
pTMA COUNTY
WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT
201 NORTH STONE AVENUE
TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207
JACKSON JENKINS PH: (570) 724-650-
DIRECrOk FAX: (520) 724-%35
December 21, 2016
Linda Thompson
The WLB Group. Inc
4444 E Broadway
Tucson, Arizona 85711
Sewerage Capacity Investigation No. 2014-118 Type I
RE: Shannon 80,124 Lots on Parcels 224210020, 224210030, 224210040.
Estimated Flow 26,784 gpd (ADWF).
Greetings:
The above referenced project is tributary to the Tres Rios Water Reclamation Facility via
the Cahada Del Oro Interceptor
Capacity is currently available for this project in the public sewer G-97-129, downstream
from manhole 4685-04.
This letter is not a reservation or commitment of treatment or conveyance capacity for
this project. It is not an approval of point and method of connection. It is an analysis of
the system as of this date and valid for one year. Allocation of capacity is made by the
Type III Capacity Response.
If further information is needed, please feel free to contact us at (520) 724-6642
Reviewed by: Kurt Stemm, CEA
%�
Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
�P�IMB WLB No. 116028-A-001
Part 11 — Land Use Plan
13. Bufferyards
A. Mitigation (if applicable)
A landscape bufferyard will be provided around the entire perimeter of the project site to help soften any
visual impacts to surrounding landowners. The bufferyards will be composed from a variety of native
vegetation and will help blend this residential neighborhood with the surrounding developments. They will
be a minimum of 20-40 feet wide and will be in accordance with the Bufferyard "A" and "B" criteria in the
Town of Oro Valley Zoning Code.
T✓ _% Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
'OUP WLB No. 116028-A-001
14. Exhibits
Part 11— Land Use Plan
Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
WLB No. 116028-A-001
IRONWOOD RIDGE
• PARCEL SIZE: 76.4± AC. - -
"' HIGH SCHOOL E
• EXISTING ZONING: SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R1-144)
• PROPOSED ZONING: SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R1-36) x' THE ESTATES
• PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS WITH BASE MIN. LOT SIZE: 0 ".
• PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS WITH REDUCED MIN. LOT SIZE: 80._ AT CAPELLA
• PROPOSED MINIMUM LOT SIZE: 70' x 125'
• PROPOSED DENSITY: 1.0 D.U./Ac.
• PROPOSED OPEN SPACE: 50.5 ± AC. (66% OF THE SITE)
• ONSITE ESOS WILL BE OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY THE HOA
• BASIN IMPROVEMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT - d,
AREA1 PER TOWN ZONING CODE SECTION 27.10.E.c AND 17.10.F.2.f.vi
_ OL_q7.
,
78
1 Q\ 31 ')
a 63 83
e
)49
6
# ze
OL • ,,. o a 35 CAPELLA T
3<�..: 66 )1
Z 0 21 Z 33
1
1 • 53 55 58 _ 5] S6 59
a D I Q 3 p rD), o C,
a
J I M, r
.�7.
SAHUARO DIVIDE
µ.
I t h y.I :d.. • t .c �..
.j CASAS CHURCH
,a I OWL VISTA PL. - •_'*
k
s _
. ..! ) ..
RMA 1 PROVIDED ONSITE: 20.6_ Ac.
CORE RESOURCE AREA PROVIDED ONSITE: 23.0± Ac. ► `Y� + ►' y�"
CRITICAL RESOURCE AREA PROVIDED ONSITE: 6.9± Ac. �''�h
. je _ ..
7• �
a
EXISTING FEMA FLOODPLAIN �•S>` r,�;."�..
CAP ELL
PROPOSED SCHEMATIC BASIN LOCATION +�� ; „� ,, � � ; ., Holi
PARCEL L
Exhibit 11-1-A ® 01 300'
Tentative Development Plan
The 14,91M Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
WLB
Group WLB No. 116028-A-001
NARANJA DR
ESL Area Minimum ESOS
Category Onsite Required
Total ESOS
Provided
CRA (7.2± Ac.) 6.8± Ac. (95%) 6.9± Ac. (96%)
CORE (23.8± Ac.) 19.0 (80%) 23.0 (97%)
RMA1 (45.4 Ac.) 22.5(49.5%) 20.6 (45%)
Total (76.4± Ac.) 48.3± Ac. (63.4%) 50.5± Ac. (66.0%)
Eel
Exhibit 11-2-A ® 01 500,
Proposed ESOS Map
wha Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site AnalysisM
Group-WLB No. 116028-A-001
PROPOSED UNDISTURBED / RESTORED AREA (45.8± Ac. or 59.9%)
MAX. PROPOSED DEVELOPED / UNRESTORED (30.6± Ac. or 40.1 %)
CRITICAL RESOURCE AREA
O PROPOSED SCHEMATIC BASIN LOCATION
�1
1 ♦♦ / i i
♦ IL
/ I I /
I�
Z
Z ♦�/// /
Z / APPROXIMATE / t
2 �/ GRADING LIMITS / 1
� / ♦/
1
1
I
1
1
1
J
a J
o >
w 0
0
CifO
O LL
d O
tr Z
O �:
0 0
Z_
Z
Z)
IW7
r—+
1 r
I /
♦ I
I /
I ♦
/ 1
1 1
� 1
� r
I ♦
/ t
t ,
51
t.
'I
r' / -----�
1
1
�
1
1
1
1
1
11
40
1 /
1 �
1 1
1
1 1
1 1
I
1
NOTE: Basins will be
constructed outside of
the graded area shown
and will be revegetated.
Exhibit 11-3-A ® 01 500'
Proposed Grading Limits
The Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysisno
Group_ iiL� WLB No. 116028-A-001
R1-144
Single Family Residential
(Oro Valley)
R1-20
R1-36 Single Family Residential
Single Family (Oro Valley)
Residential
(Oro Valley)
MILE FROM
PROJECT SITE
NARANJA DR — — — — — — — —
Q �
tY
Z
O R1-7
Z Single Family
Z
Q Residential
(Oro Valley)
1
I
I
I �
SR I
I Suburban SUBJECT
Ranch I
I (Pima County) PROPERTY
R1-36 I
I Single Family
Residential I
I (Oro Valley)
I I
I Z I
1 OU w
Q � i a
O /
EL Z
° ° /
z
1000,
Capella PAD
Pending Rezoning
Exhibit 11-4-A n
01 700'
Proposed Zoning
The Shannon 80 - Rezoning Site Analysis
c oe WLB No. 116028-A-001
n
0
Prepared by:
Erina Gruner
Reviewed and submitted by:
John M. Lindly, Ph.D.
Cultural Resources Report 2017-77
September 15, 2017
Project Number: 2019.01
Bye .......................
Westland Resources
West Land Resources, Inc. • 4001 E. Paradise Falls Drive • Tucson, Arizona 85712. 520.206.9585
DUl1Dluli
STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE 1
SURVEY REPORT SUMMARY FORM
I. REPORT TITLE
Ia. Report Title: A Cultural Resources Inventory of Approximately 77 Acres of Privately
Owned Land East of Shannon Road, between Naranja Drive and Lambert
Lane, Pima County, Arizona
b. Report Author(s): Erina Gruner
c. Date: September 15, 2017 1 d. Report No.: 2017-77
2. PROJECT REGISTRATION/PERMITS
2a. ASM Accession Number: n/a
2b. AAA Permit Number: n/a
2c. ASLD Lease Application Number(s): n/a
2d. Other Permit Number(s): n/a
3. ORGANIZATION/CONSULTING FIRM
3a. Name: Westland Resources, Inc.
3b. Internal Project Number: 2019.01
3c. Internal Project Name: Shannon 77
3d. Contact Name: Frederick W. Huntington
3e. Contact Address: 4001 East Paradise Falls Drive, Tucson, Arizona 85712
3f. Contact Phone: (520) 206-9585
3g. Contact Email: funtington@wesdandresources.com
4. SPONSOR/LEAD AGENCY
4a. Sponsor:
Shannon 77, LLC
4b. Lead Agency:
Town of Oro Valley
4c. Agency Project Number(s):
n/a
4d. Agency Project Name:
n/a
4e. Funding Source(s):
Private
4f. Other Involved Agencies:
n/a
4g. Applicable Regulations:
National Historic Preservation Act §106, Arizona Antiquities Act
(§41-841, et seq.), Arizona Historic Preservation Act (§41-861, et
seq.), Oro Valley Historic Preservation Ordinance Article 6-10
S. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR UNDERTAKING: Shannon 77, LLC, proposes to
develop a 77-acre parcel of land east of Shannon Road between Naranja Drive and Lambert Lane
(Figures 1 and 2). Following guidance from the Town of Oro Valley and the Arizona State
Museum (ASM), Shannon 77, LLC, contracted Westland Resources, Inc. (WestLand), to conduct a
cultural resources inventory of the property (the "project area") prior to any development.
% January 2016 (Rev. 1)
STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE 2
SURVEY REPORT SUMMARY FORM
6. PROJECT AREA/AREA OF POTENTIAL EFFECTS: The project is a rectangular parcel
(Parcel Nos. 224210050, 224210040, 224210020, and 224210030) of undeveloped land measuring
approximately 1,320 feet north -south by 2,540 feet east -west. The parcel is bounded on the west by
Shannon Road, on the south by Owl Vista Place, on the east by privately owned, undeveloped, or
vacant parcels, and on the north by a series of athletic fields associated with Ironwood Ridge High
School.
7. PROJECT LOCATION
7a. Address: Southwest comer of Shannon Road and Owl Vista Place
7b. Route:
7d. Nearest City/Town:
7f. Project Locator UTM:
7i. Baseline & Meridian:
7k. Legal Description(s):
8. PROJECT AREA
8a. Total Acres: 77
8b. Project Area:
n/a 7c. Mileposts Limits: n/a
Oro Valley 7e. County: Pima
497599 mE 3585270 mN 7g. NAD: 83 7h. Zone:12
Gila. and Salt River 7j. USGS Quadrangle(s): Ruelas Canyon
Township 12 South, Range 13 East, Section 9
I. Land
Jurisdiction
2. Total Acres
Surveyed
3. Total Acres Not
Surveyed
4. Justification for
Areas Not Surveyed
Private
77
0
n/a
9. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTEXTS
9a. Landform: The project area is located on a broad alluvial fan extending south from the Tortolita
Mountains. Shallow braided drainages run northeast -southwest across the property.
9b. Elevation: Elevations in the project area range from 2,600 to 2,660 feet above mean sea level.
9c. Surrounding Topographic Features: Located in the northern Tucson Basin, the project area is
situated approximately 7.25 miles east of the Santa Cruz River, 5 miles west of the Santa Catalina
Mountains, and 3.5 miles south of the Tortolita Mountains.
9d. Nearest Drainage: Several small seasonal drainages bisect the project area. The nearest named
drainage is Canada del Oro Wash, which is approximately 2 miles southeast of the property.
9e. Local Geology: The project area lies on a broad alluvial fan derived from granitic bedrock in the
Tortolita Mountains (MRCS 2017). The surface sediments are characterized as coarse sands, gravels,
and cobbles that overlie an argillic paleosol, likely Late Pleistocene or Early Holocene in age.
9f. Vegetation: The vegetation is characteristic of the Arizona Upland subdivision of the Sonoran
Desertscrub biotic community (Brown 1994) and includes creosote bush, foothills paloverde, desert
broom, bursage, prickly pear, velvet mesquite, chain fruit cholla., saguaro, and barrel cactus.
January 2016 (Rev. 1)
STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE 3
SURVEY REPORT SUMMARY FORM
9g. Soils/Deposition: Soils are composed of well -drained gravelly and sandy loams derived from
mixed alluvium (MRCS 2017). While located at the terminus of a shifting alluvial fan, the project
area is not subject to significant sediment deposition as would be found on riverine floodplains.
9h. Buried Deposits: The potential for buried cultural deposits in the project area is low.
9i. Justification: Cultural deposits on the bajada landform in this portion of the Tucson Basin are
generally located on the surface or at shallow depths. In the vicinity of the project area, these mainly
include small surface artifact scatters, roasting pits, and agricultural rock piles (Madsen et al. 1993).
No surficial evidence was observed to suggest the presence of buried cultural deposits.
10. BUILT ENVIRONMENT: The project area is undeveloped open desert bordered on the
west, east, and south by in -use roads, vacant parcels, or modern residences. It is bordered on the
north by the Ironwood High School property and athletic fields. A modem single-family residential
housing development is located immediately south of the project area. Many of these residences
were built in the 1990s.
11. INVENTORY CLASS COMPLETED
I I a. Class I Inventory: ❑
11 b. Researcher(s):
I I c. Class II Survey: ❑
I I d. Sampling Strategy:
1 I e. Class III Inventory:
12. BACKGROUND RESEARCH SOURCES
12a. AZSITE:
12b. ASM Archaeological Records Office: ❑
12c. SHPO Inventories and/or SHPO Library: ❑
12d. NRHP Database:
12e. ADOT Portal: ❑
12f. GLO Maps:
12g. Land -Managing Agency Files: n/a
12h. Tribal Cultural Resources Files: n/a
12i. Local Government Websites: n/a
12j. Other: USGS maps (Figure 4: Cortaro 1947 1:62,500; Cortaro 1957
1:62,500)
January 2016 (Rev. 1)
STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE 4
SURVEY REPORT SUMMARY FORM
13. BACKGROUND RESEARCH RESULTS
13a. Previous Projects within Study Area (study area = the project area + a 1.6-km (I -mile] buffer):
1. Project
Reference No.
2. Project Name
3. Author(s)
4. Year
1981-174.ASM*
The Northern Tucson Basin Survey, Phase I
the North
Madsen et al.
1993
1980-150.ASM
Linda Vista Terrace
Urban
1980
1991-76.ASM
Flying Diamond Connections
Eppley
1991
1992-61.ASM
Oro Valley-Naranja
Scott
1992a
1992-69.ASM
Oro Valley/Naranja (II)
Scott
1992b
1995-53.ASM
Glover & La Cholla Survey
Carpenter
1995
1995-436.ASM
Amphitheater School Site Survey
Heuett
1995
1997-102.ASM
La Cholla/Lambert Survey
Stephen
1997
2000-24.ASM
Naranja Sewer Survey
Hayes
2000
2001-552.ASM
Well Sites
Stephen
2001
2001-583.ASM
Qwest Shannon
Fuller
2001
2001-682.ASM
Lambert -Shannon Survey
Hayes
2001
2002-360.ASM
Oro Valley 40 Acre
Davis
2002
2006-593.ASM
Naranja Ranch Estates Survey
Jones
2006
2008-295.ASM
1.4 Miles along Lambert Lane
Harris Environmental
Group
2008
2009-65.ASM
Shannon Road R.O.W.
Stephen
2009
2009-479.ASM
Naranja Road Improvements
Barr
2009
2012-698.ASM
Town of Oro Valley Engineer Support — C.A.P.
Phase II Integration
King
2013
2014-71.ASM
Atlas 0673
Copperstone
2014
2014-125.ASM
AAREPL Atlas 0682
Moses and Luchetta
2014
* Intersects the project area.
January 2016 (Rev. 1)
STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE
SURVEY REPORT SUMMARY FORM
61
13b. Previously Recorded Cultural Resources in the I -Mile Buffer* Surroundin-a the Project Area:
1. Site No./
2. Affiliation
3. Site Type
4. Eligibility Status
S. Associated
Name [all ASM]
Not evaluated
Reference(s)
AZ AA:12:180
Ceramic period
A.D. 200-1500 Hohokam
Artifact scatter
ASM site card
AZ AA:12:297
Ceramic period
Artifact scatter and
Not evaluated
Stephen (2003)
A.D. 200-1500 Hohokam
rock pile
AZ AA:12:778
Unknown Hohokam
Artifact scatter
Not evaluated
Stephen (2005)
AZ AA:12:817
Ceramic period
Artifact scatter and
Considered eligible (d)
Stephen (1997)
A.D. 200-1500 Hohokam
rock clusters
AZ AA:12:1120/
Historic Euroamerican
Road
Not considered
King (2013)
La Cholla Boulevard
eligible
AZ AA:12:1134/
Historic Euroamerican
Road
Not considered
King (2013)
Naranja Drive
eligible
* No previously recorded archaeological sites are located in the project area.
13c. Historic Buildings/Districts/Neighborhoods:
1. Property Name or
Address
j n/a
2. Year
3. Eligibility Status
14. CULTURAL CONTEXTS
14a. Prehistoric Culture: Archaic, Hohokam
14b. Protohistoric Culture: O'odham, Apache
14c. Indigenous Historic Culture: O'odham, Apache
14d. Euro-American Culture: Spanish, Mexican, Anglo-American
IS. FIELD SURVEY PERSONNEL
15a. Principal Investigator:
15b. Field Supervisor:
15c. Crew:
15d. Fieldwork Date(s):
16. SURVEY METHODS
16a. Transect Intervals:
16b. Coverage (%):
16c. Site Recording Criteria:
John M. Lindly
Erina Gruner
Stephanie Brown
September 6, 2017
20 m apart
100
Arizona State Museum
I6d. Ground Surface Visibility: 40 to 90 percent
I6e. Observed Disturbances: Modern trash dumps —likely from the surrounding residences —are
present throughout the site area. Some disturbance in the way of limited ground clearance is evident
along the property's northern boundary near the Ironwood High School athletic fields. A historical
road that is maintained as a foot path crosses the western half of the property (see Figures 4 and 5).
January 2016 (Rev. 1)
STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE
SURVEY REPORT SUMMARY FORM
17. FIELD SURVEY RESULTS
17a. No Cultural Resources Identified: ❑
17b. Isolated Occurrences (IOs) Only:
17c. Number of IOs Recorded: 2
17d. Table of IOs:
6
1.10
No.
2. Description
3. Date Range
4. UTMs
Unnamed historical road depicted on 1947 Cortaro 1:62,500 USGS
quadrangle. The road is presently partially cleared and maintained as a
footpath that leads from the residential development south of the
1
property to Ironwood High School. The path is sandy -bottomed and
MN 3585152
approximately 5 feet wide and 1,425 feet long. Road berms are visible
1947—present
ME 497253
in some areas, running parallel to the path. Off -road vehicle use was
noted. Trash observed near the road/footpath dates to between the
1970s and the present day (Figure 5).
Prehistoric-
2
Basalt multi -directional core; measures 5 x 4.5 x 2.5 cm
Protohistoric,
MN 3585278
(see Figure 5)
11,000 B.C.—
ME 497917
A.D. 1500
18. COMMENTS: The cultural resources inventory was conducted on September 6. 2017, by
WestLand archaeologists Erina Groner and Stephanie Brown. The survey located one isolated
prehistoric artifact and identified a segment of one road depicted on a historical map. The road is no
longer accessible to vehicular traffic and is presently maintained as a cleared footpath. These isolates
do not define or reflect significant cultural resources in terms of the Arizona or the National
Register of Historic Places eligibility criteria. Westland recommends that the proposed project will
have no impact on cultural resources and may proceed with no further archaeological work.
WestLand provides the general recommendation that all ground -disturbing activities have the
potential to unearth. archaeological sites or human remains and that all such discoveries on private
land must be treated in accordance with Arizona Revised Statute §41-865.
19. ATTACHMENTS
19a. Project Location Map: ® Figure 1. Vicinity map
19b. Land Jurisdiction Map: ® Figure 2. Project location showing surface management
19c. Background Research Map(s): ® Figure 3. Previously recorded archaeological sites and
projects within 1.6 km (1 mile) of the project area
19d. G LO Map(s): ® Figure 4. Overlay of project area on the 1947 Cortaro
1:62,500 USGS Quadrangle [Note: Figure shows the location
of IO 1.]
9e. Results of Survey Map: ® Figure 5. Results of survey
19f. References: ® Page 8
January 2016 (Rev. 1)
STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE 7
SURVEY REPORT SUMMARY FORM
SECTION 20. CONSULTANT CERTIFICATION:
I certify the information provided herein has been reviewed for content and accuracy and all work
meets applicable agency standards.
64 rVt�
q Date: September 15, 2017
Signature
John M. Lindly, Ph.D.
Sr. Principal Investigator
Title
SECTION 21. DISCOVERY CLAUSE:
In the event that previously unreported cultural resources are encountered during ground -disturbing
activities, all work must immediately cease within 30 meters (100 feet) until a qualified archaeologist has
documented the discovery and evaluated its eligibility for the Arizona or National Register of Historic
Places in consultation with the lead agency, the SHPO, and Tribes, as appropriate. Work must not
resume in this area without approval of the lead agency.
If human remains are encountered during ground -disturbing activities, all work must immediately cease
within 30 meters (100 feet) of the discovery and the area must be secured. The Arizona State Museum,
lead agency, SHPO, and appropriate Tribes must be notified of the discovery. All discoveries will be
treated in accordance with NAGPRA (Public Law 101-601; 25 U.S.C. 3001-3013) or Arizona Revised
Statutes (A.R.S. § 41-844 and A.R.S. § 41-865), as appropriate, and work must not resume in this area
without authorization from ASM and the lead agency.
January 2016 (Rev. 1)
STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE
SURVEY REPORT SUMMARY FORM
REFERENCES:
Barr, David M. R.
2009 Archaeological Survey of Naranja Drive from Shannon Road to La Cholla Boulevard, Town of Oro
Valley, Pima County, Arizona. Cultural Resources Report No. 09-215. SWCA Environmental
Consultants, Tucson.
Brown, David E. (ed.)
1994 Biotic Communities of the American Southwest. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.
Carpenter, John P.
1995 An Archaeological Assessment of a 40 Acre Parcel at the Southeast Corner of the Intersection of Glover
Road and La Cholla, in Tucson, Arizona. Tierra Right of Way Services, Ltd., Tucson.
Copperstone, Chance
2014 A Class III Cultural Resource Survey of Proposed Natural Gas Line Rights -of -way along Shannon Road,
Gymkhana Wlay, Appaloosa Road, and Oasis Road for Southwest Gas in Pima County, AriZona.
Report No. 2014-015. Tierra Right of Way Services, Tucson.
Davis, Erin
2002 A Cultural Resource Survey of a 40 Acre Parcel of Land Owned by the Town of Oro Valley for the Proposed
West Lambert Lane Park, Oro Valley, Pima County, Arizona Report No. 2002-008. Entranco,
Phoenix.
Eppley, Lisa G.
1991 Archaeological Survey of Flying Diamond Connections Plan No. 1-178-084-90. Letter Report 91-129.
Desert Archaeology, Tucson.
Fuller, Megan S.
2001 A Cultural Resource Assessment of a Proposed Qwest Trenching Location on Shannon Drive in Oro
Valley, Pima County, Arizona. Engineering and Environmental Consultants, Inc., Arizona.
Harris Environmental Group, Inc.
2008 A Class III Cultural Resources Survey of 1.4 Miles along Lambert Lane in Oro Valley, Pima County,
Arizona. Project No. 08-003, Task 4. Harris Environmental Group, Inc., Tucson.
Hayes, John
2000 An Archaeological Assessment Survey of a 2,250-Foot Right-of-way South of Naranja Road in Oro
Valley, Pima County, Arizona. Survey Report No.2-OTO-001A. Tierra Archaeological &
Environmental Consultants, Tucson.
2001 A Cultural Resources Assessment Survey of 4.5 Acres at the Corner of Shannon and Lambert Roads in
Northwest Tucson, Pima County, Arizona. Survey Report No.2000-(1)88A. Tierra
Archaeological & Environmental Consultants, Tucson.
Heuett, Mary Lou
1995 A Cultural Resource Inventory of the Proposed Glover Road School Site for the Amphitheater School
District, Pima County, Arizona. Cultural and Environmental Systems, Inc., Tucson.
January 2016 (Rev. 1)
STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE 9
SURVEY REPORT SUMMARY FORM
Jones, Jeffrey T.
2006 A Class III Cultural Resources Survey of 31.64 Acres North of Naranja Drive and East of Shannon
Road in Oro Valley, Pima County, Arizona. Archaeological Report No. 2006-50. Tierra Right of
Way Services, Ltd., Tucson.
King, Anna M.
2013 A Cultural Resources Inventory of 11.1 Acres along La Cholla Boulevard and Naranja Drive in the Town
of Oro Valley, Pima County, Arizona. Cultural Resources Report No. 2013-09. WestLand
Resources, Inc., Tucson.
Madsen, John H., Paul R. Fish, and Suzanne K. Fish
1993 The Northern Tucson Basin Survey: Research Directions and Background Studies. Archaeological Series
182. Arizona State Museum, Tucson.
Moses, James, and Sarah Luchetta
2014 A Class I and Class III Cultural Resources Assessment Survy of 6.35 Acres of Pima County Rzght-of-
way along Camino de Norte, Montgomery Strzet, Turkey Lane, Sahuaro Divide, Potmn Lane, Camino
Alto, Camino Central, Flying Diamond Drive, Camino Christy, Lambert Lane, and Camino de la Tierra
in Tucson, Pima County, Arizona. Antigua Archaeology, LLC, Prescott.
Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS)
2017 Web Soil Survey. United States Department of Agriculture. Natural Resources Conservation
Service. Available online at http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/. Accessed September 6, 2017.
Scott, Barry G.
1992a An Archaeological Survey of a Proposed Fory Acre Development, Oro Valley, Pima County, Arizona.
Iguana Archaeological Research Consultants, Tucson.
1992b An Archaeological Survey of a Proposed Sixty Acre Development in Oro Valley, Pima County, Arizona.
Iguana Archaeological Research Consultants, Tucson.
Stephen, David V. M.
1997 Preliminary Report for La Cholla/Lambert Archaeological Survy. PAST Job No. 97776. Letter
report to Mr. Hector Martin, Casas Adobes Baptist Church, March 3, 1997. Professional
Archaeological Services and Technologies, Tucson.
2001 Letter Report for Well Sites Project. PAST Report No. 011334. Professional Archaeological
Services and Technologies, Tucson.
2003 Cultural Resources Survey of the Tangerine -La Cholla Intersection Prgiect near Oro Valley, Pima County,
Arizona. PAST Report No. 031575. Professional Archaeological Services of Tucson, Tucson.
2005 Cultural Resources Survey of the Red Rock Ridge Project near Oro Valley, Pima County, Arkona. PAST
Report No. 051763. Professional Archaeological Services of Tucson, Tucson.
2009 Archaeological Survey of the Shannon Road R.O. W. Project near Oro Valley, Pima County, Arizona.
PAST Report No. 081935. Professional Archaeological Services of Tucson, Tucson.
Urban, Sharon F.
1980 Letter Report for the Linda Vista Terrace Project. Clearinghouse Number 80-85-0187. Arizona
State Museum, Tucson.
January 2016 (Rev. 1)
ARIZONA
PROJECT
LOCATION
Pinal
County'` -
�A aran a
Pima
County'
Saguaro '
Natphal
Perk-N��f.
r.: .
otaltn�
ate F• t. -
lei
Tanque
Verde
J,
a
r
�
NAM
11•0am
.r..,„
T12S, R13E, a Portion of Section 9,
Pima County, Arizona
Silver Bell Mountains USGS 1:100,000 Quadrangle
Projection: UTM NAD83, Zone 12 Legend
Data Source: ArcGIS Online World Streetmap
0 0.5 1 N Q Project Area
Miles
West Land Resources o 1 2Kilometers
Figure 1. Vicinity map
'tkhC R!N
°`
Ri D
r
�•
t
f
• N 3585467 _
E497217
-
NM3585461
E 497991
r
1113585065'•�
N'3585062
• E 497218 •
-
E,497988
,
R
n
r i4
a
f
�
�R
f'�
(' • `J i/�
(t fj
r
T12S, R13E, a Portion of Section 9, Legend
Pima County, Arizona
Ruelas Canyon USGS 7.5' Quadrangle Project Area
Projection: UTM NAD83, Zone 12
Data Source: BLM Surface Management (2017) Surface Management
Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
o 1,000 2,000 N
Feet Private Land (No Color)
/�\\
West Land Resources 0 500 1,0 Meters / `1 State Trust Land
Figure 2. Project location showing surface management
Figure 3. Previously recorded archaeological sites and projects within 1.6 km (1 mile) of the project area
1
3D 44��
1
1
1
, C yy
yyiM i77a�
B
Y
♦r 2 `B
r r • a'.� �
II
•
i .
Y
�
\, 16 2BIIC.
\ i
so `rW � `• g
!1, 0 y
'•��,'• '' Jurho 3]epchY i ' B�
4 33a.. �,S area Mti7
yy" .......,.- w.0
1 Y Sooeie
977
I •
Q
24. r.�e� 18 asns, YN20 _.�..-a`.2�3 ,.if 22
1
.990
29 28 O S 27p—
30n
ra a}
T12S, R13E, a Portion of Section 9,
Pima County, Arizona
Cortaro USGS 15' Quadrangle
Projection: UTM NAD83, Zone 12 Legend
= Project Area
0 0.5 1 N
Miles
WestLand Resources 1 2
Kilometers
Figure 4. Overlay of project area on the 1947 Cortaro 1:62,500 USGS Quadrangle
0
Awl
N
##, Two
iv, ..
_4 C ^` fi �.N ����+� ^wF�� of :•,
�l
a
h . L VIS PLy: .OW TA q,• ,
M• s �,l .14�,� J v �r 4 sut � I • I'� 'ffaa��L '�
,�a` •�'
Z dx `�+r d''��'� ��,T•� �n.�:�� ;:''"'.x, � '� �'��•�.r l�=i� a'£ �a .. ,�`.
iF Q 1 s4 i
: Z Wk6 X•e < s►. ,,'# im ,�,t �' e x} e.'INt. '. �> �.A�a'2 .y y,�. ' a
ixeM; H 1}
6e� DESERT SPLENDOR CT L'
hT
k�R
T12S, R13E, a Portion of Section 9,
Pima County, Arizona
2012 Pictometry Orthophoto Legend
Projection: UTM NAD83, Zone 12
Project Area
0 270 540 N E Isolated Occurrence
Feet
Westland Resources 0 125 25Meters
Figure 5. Results of survey