HomeMy WebLinkAboutOV101303Microsoft Word - BOA.APP.doc - Board-�----djusumil+Appli cad o... btip://www.orovalle—ov/Assets/ assets/pz/pdf/Board+of+Adjus...
T OWN OF ORO VALLEY
PLAIVNING & ZONING DIVISION
11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE, ORO VALLEY AZ 85737
Phone: (520) 229-4800 Fax. (520) 742-1022
www.orovalleyaz.gov
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION
FOR: Zoning Variance
_ Zoning Interpretation
Appeal of Administrative Decision
NATURE OF REQUEST:
C a1 r'oo!`T
If necessary attached written narrative.
Note: Submittals are due by noon
CASE NO.: CA
` I Ot-�) - 0-�)
APPLICANT: L- A M (5710 u T
PHONE: FAX: /J0,y)C
ADDRESS: 9 S 60 N , 6 SQL OWL ,
City o Ro v ALtl State Zip $ 5 7 Email
OWNER: s 047
ADDRESS:
City0,20 VALI.C� State_a/__Zip V
PROPERTY LOCATION FOR VARIANCE REQUEST: C-d ((e SAa ✓1 U
PARCEL #: of Q � - 4 0 LEGAL DES CRIPTION: Ru � , ,� � fl 1 � 7- L,.-N C-� q 9 1
CURRENT ZONING: a � 3 � APPLICABLE FEE: ' 15D , p 0
ATTACHMENTS:
SIGNATURE OF APPLIC ANT (ALSO PRINT NAME)
1
1 of 6
DATE
_01! 20� 3
3/15/2013 9:42 PM
Microsoft Word - BOA.APP.doc - Board+of+Adjustmed+Applicatio... http://www.orovallevazrov/Assets/_assets/pz/pdf/Board+of+Adjus...
SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONS FOR APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE
Please provide the following information addressing 1 - 5 in the Findings from Section 21.6 I of the
Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised (OVZCR). In order to authorize a variance request, the Board will be
searching for sufficient evidence in accordance with the findings. Please answer the questions below
in a narrative format.
1. Are there special circumstances or conditions applying to the property referred to in the application
including its size, shape, topography, location or surroundings which do not apply to other
properties in the district?
t�aA r 0-,T f All.n,�G�,le of -Oki 6, n,r -,,�oT-T t6
holes2, l5 esscz��tl�fly riot leasiblle
2. Are there special ci cumstances that exist that are not self imposed or created by the
owner/applicant?
W eYh tke II c00 ,Ja51n 4VI A -rke a L&AAoce- 61 nAtblf't( Akw¢ (h g
-rktare,
16fk 1S sAbINATIJ w11A41C To iAC(,A� �cY k fatS� sh y. g l�cUe(,Rg5,
3. Is the authorizing of the variance necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial
nronerty rights?
At
over aA OR T�LhT—TT will 6ftp PCACL"Its �foi.CrlA4 1J 1((0rrtul qgk .
4. If granted, will the variance impose such conditions as will assure that the authorizing of the
adjustment shall not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon
other properties in the vicinity and zone in which such property is. located?
COV\5C 4'ALyAl ly , - Ac-f e- of l`i A kAVAQ0JL4 \ rt r_hn.c4 l CC4-A Yih i'4 614
5. If granted, will the variance be the minimum necessary to afford relief and will not materially affect
the health, safety, and welfare of the neighborhood or ding properties. /
,trice we af- 0-1+v ('CIA'AUtlJa q AJACttavlaV 7 et ir1 -ru-TW So s"T6
-rye 4et(AAt rDtOP(PtY („�e s�prrs � � T1oM r�tp ��►rb �,c b�l��� r��
tS
Revisad _1-2- -05
2 of 6 3/15/2013 9:42 PM
„SUPPLEMrAL QUESTIONS FOR VARIANC==PPLICATIONS
4.
5.
Please provide the following information addressing 1 — 5 in the Findings from Section 21.6 1 of the
Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised (OVZCR). In order to authorize a variance request, the Board will be
searching for sufficient evidence in accordance with the findings. Please answer the questions below
in a narrative format.
1. Are there special circumstances or conditions applying to the property referred to in the application
including its size, shape, topography, location or surroundings which do not apply to other
properties in the district?
2. Are there special circumstances that exist that are not self imposed or created by the
owner/aaalicant?
3. Is the authorizing of the variance necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial
nrnnerty rights?
If granted, will the variance impose such conditions as will assure that the authorizing of the
adjustment shall not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon
other properties in the vicinity and zone in which such property is located?
If granted, will the variance be the minimum necessary to afford relief and will not materially affect
the health, safety, and welfare of the neighborhood or surrounding properties.
L
Microsoft Word-BOA.APP.doc - Board— Wjustrrert+Applicado... jttp://www.orovall -,=,—ov/Assets/ assets/pz/pdf/Board+of+Adjus...
SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONS FOR APPLICATION FOR A V XRIANCE
Please provide the following information addressing 1 — 5 in the Findings from Section 21.6 I of the
Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised (OVZCR). In order to authorize a variance request, the Board will be
searching for sufficient evidence in accordance with the findings. Please answer the questions below
in a narrative format.
1. Are there special circumstances or conditions applying to the property referred to in the application
including its size, shape, topography, location or surroundings which do not apply to other
properties in the district?
home) 15 e55c'vMZt ik Ytot t-e4s l bt e
2. Are there special circumstances that exist that are not self imposed or created by the
owner/applicant?
JT A
�kQ C 0 0 ivAS`\
AAA -rke
41kJAoce-
61 K(ItW!':1( AQ5Q
Y1 -r ke_di lq �
rer-k
kS ;�5jMrtTla(
wi'A(k�Z
To
inc(,AaQ Oerk f,tSi 5noLkesy
T tuUe���u5.
3. Is the authorizing of the variance necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of subs al
property rights? r
N lth aw kV I'M aT Qv1c�olP� come This a�a1�T1.,Aul %y04 G�6u�� e✓a ��S Sa.N�
4. If granted, will the variance impose such conditions as assure that the authorizing of the
adjustment shall not constitute a grant of special privil inconsistent with the limitations upon
other properties in the vicinity and zone in which such afoperty is located?
10 e e &o of N b r tk
� 1, e —fin � � � �• n ssoci no•'l
•ova e 4 i4mT - F e h Cc
5. If granted, will the variance bet minimum necessary to afford relief and will not materially affect
the health, safety, and welfar f the neighborhood or surrounding properties. /
%iv1�o
rm �D r „�e Starts ' +,' M Ae b �., b tIve
r e Ties e l e c
1 \
2 of 6 \' 3/15/2013 9:42 PM
OPO�p�IEY qQ/aOyv
� 4
FUNDED 19�>
Development and Infrastructure Services
Completeness Review
Variance
State law (A.R.S. § 9-835(D) requires a Completeness Review of permit applications. A letter of
Administrative Completeness or a Notice of Deficiency must be issued to the applicant during the
Completeness Review Time Frame. This document serves as that notice. This checklist has been
provided to assist the applicant in preparing a complete application. Only complete applications can be
accepted for plan review. i l
Project Name: T iY t.1 i l c�' T OV Project Number:LN I O I _�
Project Address:���
Applicant Name: t_ e, 01 }` q < .' `7- Title: Phone
Applicant Email:
Required Information:
Provided
N/A
❑
,❑
Pre -application review letter, if applicable
/
❑
6 copies of Supplemental Questions
�(
❑
6 copies of the submitted application and narrative
❑
6 copies of 11x17 dimensioned plot plan, if applicable
f
❑
6 copies of 11 x17 dimensioned floor plan, if applicable
XJ
❑
6 copies of 11x17 building elevations, if applicable
❑
❑
Application Fee
Per the requirements of State law, this permit application is:
,,0 eAccepted as Administratively Complete
❑ Deficient, items marked above are required for plan acceptance.
Contact staff below fo(q�estiqns re
gpxding the Administrative Log -In Review Screening.
Staff Signature:
Print Name:
Phone: /
Date:
Revision Date: 03/19/2013
9860 N Calle Solano Place
Zoning Variance
OV1013-03
Engineering Comments, 1St Submittal
Mike Todnem, P.E.
May 3, 2013
The Town of Oro Valley Permitting Division has no Engineering comments regarding
the proposed zoning variance. The front yard setback has been reviewed to verify that
its reduction will not create a drainage issue. Verification of engineering code
requirements for items such as the conveyance of drainage along the addition will take
place during review of the Building/Grading Plan submittal for permit.
If you have any questions please call David Laws at (520)229-4808.
Eng-var-O 1 -20130503
Board of Adjustment
Page 1 of 6
MINUTES
ORO VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
REGULAR SESSION
May 28, 2013
ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE
CALL TO ORDER AT OR AFTER 3:00 PM
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Bill Adler, Chair
Helen Dankwerth, Vice Chair
John Bohl, Member
Michael Schoeppach, Member
Stephen Roach, Member
Also Present: Mike Zinkin, Council Member
Joe Andrews, Oro Valley Chief Civil Deputy Attorney
ORDER OF BUSINESS
Chair Adler recommended changing the order of the agenda, item number
OV1013-05, will be heard first.
REGULAR AGENDA
1. APPROVAL OF THE APRIL 23, 2013 MEETING MINUTES
April 23, 2013 Board of Adjustment Meeting Minutes
MOTION: A motion was made by Vice Chair Dankwerth and seconded by
Member Schoeppach to Approve the April 23, 2013 meeting minutes.
MOTION carried, 5-0.
5. REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE FOR LOT 59 IN THE VERDE CATALINA
TOWNHOUSES TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED REAR YARD SETBACK
FROM 10' TO 0' AND REDUCE THE MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN
BUILDINGS FROM 10' TO 0' FOR A COVERED PORCH ADDITION,
LOCATED AT 8335 N. VERDE CATALINA DRIVE, OV1013-05.
Item 4, Staff Report
Item 4, Attachment 1
http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=9&clip_id=1738 04/22/2014
Board of Adjustment
Page 2 of 6
Item 4, Attachment 2
Item 4, Attachment 3
Item 4, Attachment 4
Patty Hayes, Zoning Plans Examiner, Staff Presentation
- Location map
- Zoning
- Request Details
- Verde Catalina
- Public Input
- Summary/Conclusion
- Variance Criteria Five Findings
Applicant, Brian Beamish presented his request to the Board of
Adjustments. Applicant Beamish would appreciate having the patio roofing
extended to assist in protecting his artwork from sun and rain.
Robert Barth, Oro Valley resident indicated he is opposed to the structure,
because the structure is not truly connected to the building itself. Further,
he is not supportive of the variances in residential architecture.
Fran Young Oro Valley Resident. Mrs. Young is opposed to the variance
request, due to her believing the townhouses should have a continuity of
design throughout their community. In addition, Mrs. Young is concerned
with the water run off, should the roofing be permitted.
Gordon Young, Oro Valley Resident, opposed to the proposed variance
due to the metal roof being unsightly. Mr. Young voiced his concerns with
the water run-off potentially causing erosion or a ditch in the walking path
area.
Larry Tucci, Oro Valley Resident, expressed he is opposed to the variance
due to the rain potentially running off. Mr. Tucci also stated there is a strong
odor created by the applicant's kelm.
Jim Seppala, Oro Valley resident, lives behind applicant. States Mr.
Beamish did not obtain an approval from HOA prior to the building of the
structure. Mr. Seppala is unsupportive of the proposed variance.
Jackie Ramsey Oro Valley Resident - not opposed to the proposed
variance. She stated there is no odor nor issue as far as she knew.
MOTION: A motion was made by Vice Chair Dankwerth and seconded by
Member Bohl to Approve the variance. Chair Adler proposed a Friendly
http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view id=9&clip_id=1738 04/22/2014
Board of Adjustment Page 3 of 6
amendment there should be a discussion with staff regarding the final
design of the roof which was accepted by Vice Chair Dankwerth.
MOTION carried, 4-1 with Member Roach opposed.
2. REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE FOR LOT 599 IN RANCHO FELIZ TO
REDUCE THE REQUIRED FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM 30' TO 26'
FOR A GARAGE ADDITION, LOCATED AT 9860 N. CALLE SOLANO,
OV1013-03.
Item 1 Staff Report
Item 1, Attachment 1
Item 1, Attachment 2
Item 1, Attachment 3
Patty Hayes, Zoning Plans Examiner, Staff Presentation
- Approvals to date
- Location Map
- Rancho Feliz lot 599
- Applicant's Proposal
- Public Input
- Summary
- Variance Criteria Five Findings
Barbara Stout, Oro Valley Resident and applicant, stated the design of the
proposed garage would allow for a work bench as well as allow her
husband to work on their vehicles inside of their garage.
MOTION: A motion was made by Member Schoeppach and seconded by
Member Roach deny the variance request, for lot 599 in Rancho Feliz,
OV 1013-03.
MOTION carried, 3-2 with Vice Chair Dankwerth and Member Bohl
opposed.
4. REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE FOR LOT 84 IN RANCHO CATALINA TO
REDUCE THE REQUIRED REAR YARD SETBACK FROM 40' TO 33'
FOR A GARAGE ADDITION, LOCATED AT 325 E. FOUR HORSES,
OV1013-07.
Item 3, Staff Report
Item 3, Attachment 1
Item 3, Attachment 2
http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=9&clip_id=1738 04/22/2014
Board of Adjustment
Page 4 of 6
Item 3, Attachment 3
Rosevelt Arellano, Planner, Staff Report
- Approvals to Date
- Request
- Satelite image
- Adjacent Properties
- Applicants Plot Plan
- Summary
- Variance Criteria Fie Findings
Mike & Terry Powelson, Applicants and Oro Valley Residents -
presented their application for variance.
Lamar Lovik, Oro Valley Resident, expressed he is opposed to
the proposed rear yard setback variance, due to the homeowner's business
being run from the property. And water run off from the roof.
James Capasso, Oro Valley Resident, is opposed to this variance due to
there having been a garage when the property owner purchased the
property stated due to the noise.
Gloria Wyckoff, Oro Valley resident, stated she is opposed to the variance.
She suggested the owner reduce the size of the garage. Mrs. Wyckoff is
concerned with the destruction of the natural desert landscape.
Rosevelt Arellano, Planner, presented an email which was received by staff
from Oro Valley Resident Robert Crawford, expressing his concerns with
the variance due to the water run off. Mr. Crawford opposes the variance.
MOTION: A motion was made by Member Bohl and seconded by Vice
Chair Dankwerth to Approve the variance request for lot 84 in Rancho
Catalina, OV1013-07,
MOTION carried, 5-0.
3. REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE FOR LOT 1 IN RANCHO VISTOSO
NEIGHBORHOOD 10 PARCEL S TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED REAR
YARD SETBACK FROM 10' TO 5' TO BUILD A NEW HOUSE, LOCATED
AT 1078 W. REDLANDS DRIVE, OV1013-04.
Item 2, Staff Report
Item 2, Attachment 1
Item 2, Attachment 2
http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=9&clip_id=1738 04/22/2014
Board of Adjustment
Page 5 of 6
Item 2, Attachment 3
Patty Hayes, Zoning Plans Examiner, Staff Presentation
- Location Map
-RV NH2OPar SLot 1
- Request Details
- Applicant's proposal
- Corner Lots
- Summary
- Variance Criteria Five Findings
Sean Rich, Representative of Richmond American, provided Richmond
American's reasoning behind requesting the variance.
MOTION: A motion was made by Member Roach and seconded by
Member Bohl to Approve the request for Variance at 1078 W. Redlands
Drive, OV1013-04,
MOTION carried, 5-0.
6. REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE FOR LOT 18 IN RIVERS EDGE II TO
REDUCE THE REQUIRED REAR YARD SETBACK FROM 10' TO 0' FOR
A PORCH ADDITION AND SPA, LOCATED AT 10709 N. HEWITT PLACE,
OV1013-06.
Item 5, Staff Report
Item 5, Attachment 2
Item 5, Attachment 3
Patty Hayes, Zoning Plans Examiner, Staff Presentation
- Location Map
- Request Details
- Aplicant's proposal
- Rivers Edge II lot 18
- Public Input
- Summary
- Variance Criteria Five Findings
Eric Bramble, Oro Valley Resident and Applicant. The applicant stated the
builder set the house on the setback on nearly all sides. Mr. Bramble states
because of the way the house faces, the summer sun heats the rear of their
residence. In order to provide relief from the summer heat on the rear of
their home they are requesting the variance.
Judy McElroy, Oro Valley resident, and representative of the Homeowners
Association, stated she is in favor of the variance, as well as the
http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=9&clip_id=1738 04/22/2014
Board of Adjustment Page 6 of 6
Homeowners Association having approved of the request within the
Association.
MOTION: A motion was made by Vice Chair Dankwerth and seconded by
Member Bohl to Approve the request for variance for lot 18 in Rivers Edge
II, OV1013-06,
MOTION failed, 2-3 with Chair Adler, Member Schoeppach, and Member
Roach opposed.
PLANNING UPDATE (INFORMATIONAL ONLY)
Chad Daines, Principal Planner, Presented an update to the Board. Major
General Plan amendment window has closed. Three amendments were
filed. One for Olson Property on Moor Rd. and Miller Ranch and Rancho
Vistoso 11-J. Staff has been working on a General Plan Awareness Plan to
educate the community on the General Plan process. Staff is also working
on a Planning Work program.
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Chad Daines, Principal Planner stated at the upcoming June Meeting there
is one application for a pool variance. There may also be one additional
application to be heard.
Chair Adler requested Staff include a discussion regarding an application
deadline. Chair Adler would also like to discuss requiring typed or
electronic applications.
ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: A motion was made by Member Schoeppach and seconded by
Member Roach to Adjourn the Board of Adjustment Meeting
MOTION carried, 5-0.
http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=9&clip_id=1738 04/22/2014
Board of Adjustment Staff Report
CASE NUMBER: OV1013-03
MEETING DATE: May 28, 2013
AGENDA ITEM: 1
STAFF CONTACT: Patty Hayes, Zoning Plans Examiner
phayes(c�orovalleyaz.gov (520) 229-4819
Applicant: Larry and Barbara Stout (520) 797-2757
Request: Front yard setback reduction for a garage addition.
Location: 9860 North Calle Solano
SUMMARY:
The applicant, Mr. and Mrs. Stout, proposes to enclose their existing carport into a garage
and extend the enclosed garage into the front yard setback. The property is located in an
R1-36 zoning district which requires a 30' front yard setback. The proposed garage will
extend into the 30' front yard setback by 4'.
BACKGROUND:
Existing Site Conditions
• The property is .83 of an acre which contains a detached single-family home
landscaped with native vegetation.
Proposed Improvements
• Enclose carport into a garage with 4' of the garage extending into the front yard
setback.
Related Approvals
• Rancho Feliz subdivision approved in 1979
• Annexed by the Town of Oro Valley in 1989
The existing zoning for the property and the surrounding area is R1-36 and is developed as a
single family detached subdivision.
OV 1013-03 Stout Variance
Board of Adjustment Staff Report
ANALYSIS:
Page 2 of 3
The subject lot contains a 1,500 square foot home and two car carport built in 1981. The
proposed project will enclose the existing carport into a garage which will provide space
for a workshop area and parking for two full size pickup trucks.
The proposed garage will extend 12' in front of the house toward the front lot line. Four
(4) feet of the enclosed garage is proposed to extend into the 30' front yard setback thus
reducing the front yard setback to 26'. There is an additional 7' of land from the edge of
the pavement to the front lot line as shown in Attachment 2. This will allow for 33' of
driveway length with the proposed garage.
FINDINGS OF FACT:
The right-of-way width for Calle Solano, a public street, is 40' with only 25' of
pavement.
Homes in the area include a variety of attached and detached open carports and
enclosed garages.
Many of the homes near the subject property are built 40' to 50' away from their front
lot line as shown in Attachment 3.
DISCUSION:
The Board of Adjustment should consider the following findings in making its decision for
each variance request:
1. That there are special circumstances or conditions applying to the property referred to
in the application including its size, shape, topography, location or surroundings which
do not apply to other properties in the district;
The applicant refers to the location of the house as originally being built too close to
the front lot line without utilizing more of the yard in the rear portion of the lot. The
applicant proposes to enclose the existing carport into a garage with enough space for
their vehicles, a work bench and hobby equipment storage.
2. That special circumstances were not created by the owner or applicant;
The applicant indicates that the home builder chose to build the home more forward
on the lot without consideration for future expansion. As previously indicated, many
of the homes are setback 40-50 feet from the front property line which can
accommodate future expansions similar to the applicant's request.
3. That the authorizing of the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment
of substantial property rights, -
The homeowners prefer to drive full size pickup trucks and wish to build a garage
enclosure with enough depth to store these vehicles while also providing a workshop
area. Their preference is to keep their hobby equipment and vehicles in a secured
enclosed space.
O'%;V13-03 Stout Variance Page 3 of 3
Bogard of Adjustment Staff Report
4. That any variance granted imposes such conditions as will assure that the authorizing
of the adjustment shall not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the
limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which such property is
located;
The applicant reiterates their desire to keep their vehicles in an enclosed secure
garage. They prefer not to display their storage items in an open carport as is common
in homes without garages. They have determined 30' is a length that will provide a
functional garage space for their needs.
5. That the authorizing of the variance will not be materially detrimental to persons
residing in the vicinity, to adjacent property, to the neighborhood or the public welfare
in general.
The applicant indicates that converting the open carport into an enclosed garage will
enhance the neighborhood and not create safety problems. Their application states
that they will have 26' of driveway remaining. With the 7' of unpaved right-of-way, the
driveway space will be approximately 33' as shown on Attachment 2. The propertyis
not located on a curve or near a street intersection so therefore the garage extension
should not create a sight visibility problem for vehicles driving on Calle Solano.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
All property owners within 300 feet of the subject property were notified of this hearing
by mail. The property is posted with a notice of hearing, was posted online at
www.oroval[eVaz.gov and was advertised in the Daily Territorial. No inquires into this
case were made at the time of this report.
SUGGESTED MOTIONS:
I move to approve OV1013-03,
A Variance for a Front Yard Setback reduction from 30' to 26' based on the finding that
the five criteria have been met.
I move to deny OV1013-03,
A Variance for a Front Yard Setback reduction from 30' to 26' based on the finding that
the five criteria have not been met.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Applicant's Proposal
2. Aerial Photo close up
3. Location Map
Chad Daines, Principal Planner
Microsoft Word - BOA.APP.doc - Boardludjustmeffi+Applicatio... IIV://www.orovaBeyazgoN,/Assets/_assets/pz/pd:UBoard+of+Adjus...
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
_ PLAl�`NE%SG & ZONII� G DIVISION
11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE, ORO VALLEY AZ 85737
Phone: (520) 229-4800 Fax: (520) 742-1022
Wm-%v.orovalleyaz bov
BOARD OF ADJUSTIMENT APPLICATION
FOR: Zoning Variance
_ Zoning Interpretation
_ Appeal of Administrative Decision
NATURE OF REQUEST:
Note: Submittals are due by noon
CASE NO.:
WQ woulA I I U To eAc�oSe- O,1T cgrWo^T� UJP 'A 51 Jan'C To e&teVAj C-V-Tor-afj
_-ro gqr4: ,a ov.r oe�A-Apz) , Le ikel f�Q� �r�M -rL, ejemrot �
If necessary attached Written narrative.
APPLICANTT: `/A l ( `r 1> ft b AQ A S I 0 to T
PHONE: _( FAX: tJoNE
ADDRESS: 9S 60 So`avtr.,
City oRo v ACgF ( State Zip 815 7 Email
OWNER: s-047 CARRY F. q- AAR(3
ADDRESS:
CityC,20 tt LL.� State-h/—ZipKS2
PROPERTY LOCATION FOR VARIANCE REQUEST: Q ((e Su (q v1 o
PARCEL #: R� y — 40 ^ I $$ 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: �� � �1n � � � y_ L o � C
CURRENT ZONING: 1 3 APPLICABLE FEE: 1 15D , 0 o
ATTACHA4ENTS:
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT (ALSO PRINT NAME) DATE
1
1 of 6
-A) - .20t 3
3/15/2013 9:42 PM
ATTACHMENT 1
„SUPPLEJIMTAL QUESTIONS FOR VARIANU"PPLICATIONS
Please provide the following information addressing 1 — 5 in the Findings from Section 21.6 1 of the
Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised (OVZCR). In order to authorize a variance request, the Board will be
searching for sufficient evidence in accordance with the findings. Please answer the questions below
in a narrative format.
1. Are there special circumstances or conditions applying to the property referred to in the application
including its size, shape, topography, location or surroundings which do not apply to other
properties in the district?
2. Are there special circumstances that exist that are not self imposed or created by the
owner/aaplicant?
3. Is the authorizing of the variance necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial
orooertv riahts?
4. If granted, will the variance impose such conditions as will assure that the authorizing of the
adjustment shall not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon
other properties in the vicinity and zone in which such property is located?
5. If granted, will the variance be the minimum necessary to afford relief and will not materially affect
the health, safety, and welfare of the neighborhood or surroundina oroDerties.
Proposed Carport to Garageand Extension at:
jj
9860 N CALLE SOLANO
ORO VALLEY, AZ 85737
Owner
STOUT LARRY F & BARBARA J JT/RS
9860 N CALLE SOLANO
ORO VALLEY, AZ 85737
Legal Description
RANCHO FELIZ LOT 599
(FORMERLY 203-28-1880)
PARCEL I.D.: 224-40-1880
0
T12S R13E S15
z
CLOUDED AREA INDICATES NEW UNDER ROOF AREA.
Zoning
0
TOTAL LENGTH OF EXTESION IS 12'. CURRENT
Rl-36
V)
SETBACK ACCOMADATES 8'OF GARAGE EXTENSION.
SETBACKS:
w
REMAINING 4'CROSSES 30' FRONT SETBACKAND IS
i
FRONT YARD: 30'
REAR
_j
THE BASIS OF PROPOSED VARIANCE.
YARD: 40'
45!
SIDE YARDS: 15'
u
Applicable Codes
2012 I.R.C.
2011 N.E.C.
ORO VALLEY OUTDOOR LIGHTING CODE
2.6,
T'
LOCAL CODES &AMENDMENTS
3
Generl Notes
`
�j
1 ALLaWORK TO COMPLY WITH THE ABOVE CODES.
` , I�,. --
1
'
2 NO NATURAL GRADING, DRAINAGE OR VEGETATION TO BE
DISTURBED AS A RESULT OF THIS PROJECT.
3. NO UNDERGROUND UTILITIES TO BE ADDED OR ALTERED
AS A RESULT OF THIS PROJECT
T:1
Square Footagge Caics
hr
j
EX ISTING LIVING AREA 1476 SQ FT
1-i-IJ, J
(J;
�j
EXISTING CARPORT (TO GARAGE) 360
EXISTING PATIO 200
77
F 777:
r;
NORTH
TOTAL UNDER ROOF 2,276 SQ FT
SOUTH (SIDE) ELEVATION,
SALE: 1 20'!
E ;1Index
of Pages
SCALE: 1/4" V
1. SITE PLAN/ELEVATIONS
916,AFF:
2. CONSTRUCTION PLAN
i4l_
Additional Notes
1. PROPERTY SETBACKS AREAS FOLLOWS:
REAR YARD: 40'
7777'
SIDE YARDS: 15'
"J
CALLE SOLANO RIGHT OF WAY WIDTH IS 40'. PROPERTY OWNER To
VERIFY LOACATION OF FRONT PROPERTY LINE AND ENSURE NEW
CONSTRUCTION IS 30' FROM PROPERTY LINE.
2. ALL POOLS AND SPAS MUST HAVE AN ENCLOSURE AND BARRIER
THAT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
POOL AND SPA CODE. DOOR ALARMS
.7j
-F
A.!.
ARE NOT PERMITTED FOR POOL II
BARRIERS. (NO POOL OR SPA ON THIS PROPERTY.)
77777777-7-
3. THE TRUSS CALCUKLATIONS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE TOWN OF i 1i
WEST (FRONT) ELEVATION
I
ORO VALLEY ASA DEFERRED SUBMITTAL. THE TRUSSES SHALL NOT
SCALE: 1/41' = V
I
BE INSTALLED UNTIL THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY HAS REVIEWED AND
11.6Aff.
APPROVED THE TRUSSES.
'A
0S1te Plan Kenotes
1. EXISTING LIVING ARE (2428 F.F.E.)
SITE PLAN
0
2. EXISTING REAR PATIO
3. ISTING CARPORT BE CONVERTED
EXNEW
IELEVATIONS ,
(To TO GARAGE)
4. GARAGE EXTENSION
5. DRIVEWAY
6. STREET CURB
7.30'FRONT SETBACK
STOUT CARPORT ENCLOSURE & EXTENSION
8.40'REAR SETBACK
9860 N CALLE SOLANO
9.15'SIDE SETBACKS
-ORO VALLEY, AZ 85737
do' FR_
m
Nim
i,
I, I,
:
1,
I
t:.
I
,
r
Za6s :
SST.'
Eln)
6
3
�I
1
If
I
1
,
;,
i
tt
-
t
f
WIDE WALK
WAY
�..
SLAB ONLY
i
I-
�
1
t
_
NEW
r
1
!
I I
f
r
1 ,
4
I
a•
t
.. :.
,•;,:,
•.
..# I I
. r_..;
; , I
: _
( �
II
.:..1 �
1..
i 1�
13
i
t J
I i
1
1
#
C 5 SECTION CUT
N,":
f-I I
S
SEE FOUNDATION
t
PLAN FOR FULL SCALE.::.
i
_
l
.--A
J. j.!
IJ,
. i
I
I �.
r
(
i
_
. � L
.. ;ter_
_1�jl
+�
I ;.. .
I4
- _
I
ji,
f
+ '._y
!
4
i
✓ .. i6,,,1::bf�S� Y.,",:_„ .�
:
,
Ir
.L.:
r'i
General Notes U neynotes4_1 a
1. LANDINGS: 36"x36" LANDINGS MUST BEAT EACH MAN DOOR , jLj
Framing Notesi.
1. EXISTING HOUSE i 1 g
TO EXTERIOR OF STRUCTURE. 2. EXISTING EXISTING MASONRY COLUMN TO BE REMOVED , hi r s 1. ALL WORK TO COMPLY WITH 2O12 I.R.C.
2. ROOFING: ROOFING TO BE DRIED IN AND FINISHED WITH A 20 3. 36" x 36" LANDING 16 '.! , " 2. ALL LUMBER TO BE DOUGLAS FIR #2 OR BETTER.
4. EXISTING DRIVEWAY/GARAGE FLOOR j 3. USE TREATED LUMBER AT SILL PLATES.
YEAR SHINGLE. COLORAND STYLE TO MATCH EXISTING. I 11:
3. GLAZING: NEW WINDOW TO BE DUAL PANED, LOW-E GLASS. 5. 12"x12" FOOTING WITH 2- #4 REBAR WITH 4-6" STEM WALL ; 4. ROOF DECKING TO BE 12" O.S.B. NAILED AT 6" O.C. AT I
WITH 1- #4 REBAR IN STEM I I i -, t EDGES & 12" O.C. IN FIELD.
4. INTERIOR FINISH: ALL CEILINGS AND WALLS AT STORAGE AND I f 1_J
GARAGE TO BE COVERED IN 1/2" GYPSUM BOARD. AT CEILINGS, 6. SIMPSON PAHD22 HOLD DOWNS (4 TOTAL) E ! I I a i 1 5. ENTIRE NEW PORTION TO BE SHEATHED IN 3/8" O.S.B. I j ' t '
USE SAG -RESISTANT BOARD. 7. 2x6 WALLS -STUDS 18" O.C. tl - : i i 6 1 ; ) , AND NAILED AT 6" O.C. AT EDGES AND 12" O.C. IN FIELD { ," 1111) it
5. INSULATION: NONE REQUIRED. TO BE INSTALLED PER OWNER ONLY. 8. EXISTING 3-1/8x 13-1/2 GLU LAM BEAM i „ r I-} i I 6. EXISTING ROOFING TO BE REMOVED AND EXPOSED TO
6. EXTERIOR FINISH: GARAGE/STORAGEAREATO BE FINISHED IN 9. NEW 3-1/8x11-7/8 GLU LAM BEAM s I I f 1 ' ' DECKING. 2X8 OVER -FRAMING TO OCCUR TO FORM
WESTERN ONE-KOTE STUCCO SYSTEM. USE 2 LAYERS OF 40# 10.2x6 HEADER ' j ` NEW RIDGE BACK TO MEET EXISTING RIDGE OF HOUSE:
VAPOR BARRIER UNDER 1" FOAM (12" AT SHEAR PANELS), WIRE 11.2x8 HEADER '
MESH & STUCCO FINISH. SYSTEM TO BE INSTALLED PER 2006 I.R.C. i 12. PRE FABRICATED TRUSSES y I
& MANUFACTURERS SPECS. 13.2xB OVERFRAMING
7. NEW LIGHTS AND RECEPS TO BE JUMPED FROM EXISTING. ALL 14. EXISTING RIDGE OF HOUSE
15. 16" OVERHANG i• I+ I t 1 .1.1 1 i,'
RECEPS TO BE GFCI PROTECTED. ALL EXTERIOR LIGHTING TO BE
SHIELDED PER ORO VALLEY OUTDOOR LIGHTING CODE. ALL DEVICES 16.3/8" O.S.B. SHEATHING • ' t::T ( J__I f ) I;
LABELED AS "EXISTING" OR "NEW" ON FLOOR PLAN. 17. WESTERN ONE KOTE STUCCO SYSTEM ' -¢ t ! I
- v 18. SIMPSON H25 EATRUSS TO TOP PLATEf
J I{
19. 12" O.S.B. DECKING x
IDETAIL 1
20. SHINGLED ROOFINGj 4., ill
I ,
;
21. VENTED FRIEZE BOARDS
22.4x6 SUPPORT POST FOR EXISTING BEAM 1 ; + i
Foundation Notes - -
7.
1. ALL WORK TO COMPLY WITH 2O12 I.R.C.r_� €'CONSTRUCTION!j 1
2. EXISTING DRIVEWAY TO BE USED AS GARAGE SLAB. SLAB TO '
PLAN
•.
I_
BE CUT 12" WIDE TO ACCOMDATE NEW FOOTINGS. + �- - -
tIi
3. FINISHED GRADE SHALL SLOPE AWAY FROM STRUCTURE ATA
x I I `I
e
MINIMUM OF 6 PER 10 FEET.
4. ALL
LL FOOTINGS TO BEAR MIN 12 INTO NATIVE, UNDISTURBED -' � , ; , , ; -I , 1 -' • ' ' - ' - `-`
(
,
SOIL. i I SURE EXTENSION
f STOUT CARPORT ENCLOSURE &
5. 12`x10"ANCHOR BOLTS SHALL BE USEDAT48" O.C. & WITHIN } 9860 N CALLE SOLANO
7-12" OF PLATE SPLICES AND ENDS. BOLTS SHALL HAVE A MIN. i
OF 7" EMBEDMENT INTO CONCRETE.
ORO VALLEY, AZ 85737
1
I
Proposed Carport to Garage and Extension at:
Ztiz.00', �
T
9860 N CALLE SOLANO
-`
=y r
ORO VALLEY, AZ 85737
Owner
}
STOUT LARRY
F & BARBARA J JT/RS
•; . ,, ;
, .
9860 N CALLE SOLANO
/
.
7 Z,ORO
VALLEY, AZ 85737
Legal Description
RANCHO FELIZ LOT 599
l
i I
1
(FORMERLY 203-28-1880)
PARCEL I.D.: 224-40-1880
T12S R13E S15
Zoning
CLOUDED AREA INDICATES NEW UNDER ROOF AREA.
R1-36
TOTAL LENGTH OF EXTESION IS 12% CURRENT
!
SETBACK ACCOMADATES 8' OF GARAGE EXTENSION. I,
"+
SETBACKS:
ap
REMAINING 4'CROSSES 30' FRONT SETBACKAND IS ;
_
il
1�
FRONT YARD: 30'
THE BASIS OF PROPOSED VARIANCE��
REAR YARD: 40'
I:
SIDE YARDS: 15'
�
Applicable Codes
jr
20121.R.C.
2011 N.E.C.
ORO VALLEY OUTDOOR LIGHTING CODE
LOCAL CODES & AMENDMENTS
OA
Z[by6s
:3
AEW
/ Y
ova
,
{
'
0.
r
6 SECTION CUT-
o
t
f ,
I ..
SEE FOUNDATIONKAt1
LAN FOR FULL SCA_ LE L
/ rJ.L
I i
,
r,
rt
{� 0FOU
} SC
FLOOR PLAN
SCALE: 1/4" =1';. -:..
:: '
Iq
i= ' ;'
! x: , PLAN AL G
,
General Notes
Q Keynotes
I-L t
it
1. LANDINGS: 36"x36" LANDINGS MUST BEAT EACH MAN DOOR
1. EXISTING HOUSE
!
Framing Notes
g
TO EXTERIOR OF STRUCTURE.
2. EXISTING EXISTING MASONRY COLUMN TO BE REMOVED
1. ALL WORK TO COMPLY WITH 2O12 I.R.C.
L.:
2. ROOFING: ROOFING TO BE DRIED IN AND FINISHED WITH A 20
3. 36" x 36' LANDING
2. ALL LUMBER TO BE DOUGLAS FIR #2 OR BETTER:
YEAR SHINGLE. COLOR AND STYLE TO MATCH EXISTING.
4. EXISTING DRIVEWAY/GARAGE FLOOR
5. 12"x12" FOOTING
I
3. USE TREATED LUMBER AT SILL PLATES. r
3. GLAZING: NEW WINDOW TO BE DUAL PANED, LOW-E GLASS.
WITH 2- #4 REBAR WITH 4.6" STEM WALL
s
4. ROOF DECKING TO BE 12" O.S.B. NAILED AT 6' O.C. AT I
4. INTERIOR FINISH: ALL CEILINGS AND WALLS AT STORAGE AND
WITH 1- #4 REBAR IN STEM
EDGES & 12" O.C. IN FIELD. j , ,
GARAGE TO BE COVERED IN 1/2° GYPSUM BOARD. AT CEILINGS,
6. SIMPSON PAHD22 HOLD DOWNS (4 TOTAL)
$
t7
i ; 115.
ENTIRE NEW PORTION TO BE SHEATHED IN 3/8" O.S.B. I
!
USE SAG -RESISTANT BOARD,
7.2x6 WALLS -STUDS 16" O.C.
AND NAILED AT 6' O.C.AT EDGES AND 12" O.C. INFIELD
5. INSULATION: NONE REQUIRED. TO BE INSTALLED PER OWNER ONLY.
B. EXISTING 3-1/8x 13-12 GLU LAM BEAM
j:
! ; ' I i
6. EXISTING ROOFING TO BE REMOVED AND EXPOSED TO
6. EXTERIOR FINISH: GARAGE/STORAGE AREA TO BE FINISHED IN
H. NEW 3-1/Bx11-7/8 GLU LAM BEAM
10.2x6 HEADER
I i . } .i
` ; t
DECKING. 2X8 OVER -FRAMING TO OCCUR TO FORM i ;It
WESTERN ONE-KOTE STUCCO SYSTEM. USE 2 LAYERS OF 40#
t
NEW RIDGE BACK TO MEET EXISTING RIDGE OF HOUSE:
VAPOR BARRIER UNDER V FOAM (12"AT SHEAR PANELS), WIRE
MESH &STUCCO FINISH. SYSTEM TO BE INSTALLED PER 2006 I.R.C.12.
11. 2x8 HEADER
PRE FABRICATED TRUSSES
& MANUFACTURERS SPECS.
7. NEW LIGHTS AND RECEPS TO BE JUMPED FROM EXISTING. ALL
13.2x8 OVERFRAMING
14. EXISTING RIDGE OF HOUSE
f
15. 16" OVERHANG
RECEPS TO BE GFCI PROTECTED. ALL EXTERIOR LIGHTING TO BE
SHIELDED PER ORO VALLEY OUTDOOR LIGHTING CODE. ALL DEVICES
16. 3/8" O.S.B. SHEATHING
•'
r '
1.
s }.,.
;_ ' + t' T_ I
LABELED AS "EXISTING" OR "NEW" ON FLOOR PLAN. - -
17. WESTERN ONE KOTE STUCCO SYSTEM
I a
t ' r , , +
18. SIMPSON H25 EA TRUSS TO TOP PLATE
i
r
11
19. 12 O.S.B. DECKING
DETAIL 1 �
I I..
20. SHINGLED ROOFING
21. VENTED FRIEZE BOARDS
_
I I
I
22.4x6 SUPPORT POST FOR EXISTING BEAM �
a:.
� i -
t
Foundation Notes
.
c ,
I ;+
1. ALL WORK TO COMPLY WITH 2O12 I.R.C.
2. EXISTING DRIVEWAY TO BE USED AS GARAGE SLAB.- SLAB TO
is
�
O ON 1 ;
T
BE CUT 12" WIDE TO ACCOMDATE NEW FOOTINGS.
;+t
•.
,
, : ; _,
r
3. FINISHED GRADE SHALL SLOPE AWAY FROM STRUCTURE
; .1., _..;
I i
i . • ; '
1 -
.PLAN
-
i i ,'.
MINIMUM OF 6" PER 10 FEET.
i +
4. ALL FOOTINGS TO BEAR MIN 12"INTO NATIVE, UNDISTURBED
I i
I,
i
_
SOIL
5. x10 ANCHOR BOLTS SHALL BE 48' O.C. & WITHIN
I
I (
STOUT CARPORT ENCLOSURE & EXTENSION •'
7-1-12' OF PLATE SPLICES AND ENDS.. BOLTS BOLTS SHALL HAVE A MIN.
OF 7" EMBEDMENT
I
I
i
9860 N CALLE SOLANO
INTO CONCRETE.
i
O RO VALLEY, AZ 85737
EY
°�`-,o Location Map
Rancho Feliz Lot 599 (OV1013-03)
F°ENDED }9a
Attachment 2
Rancho Feliz Lot 599 Stout
OV1013-03
Board of Adjustment
May 28, 2013
provals To Date
— Final Plat approved in 1979
—Annexed by the Town in 1989
—Zoning translated to R1-36
— House built in 1981
N:.
Location
ttnbert Larte .. ~
Request Details
6) Applicant proposes to enclose existing
. carport into a garage
Request
— Front yard setback reduction
— From 30' to 26'
cho Feliz Lot 599
licant's proposal q_
Public Input _. _NOW
. _.
ct Properties within 300' notified by mail
• Posted online
• Sign on property
• Daily Territorial
ummary
a) Front yard setback reduction from 30' to
26'
Q Build a garage enclosure
Variance Criteria,`:
Five Findings '
A Special circumstances or conditions apply specifically to the
subjectproperty... size, shape, topography, location or
surroundings
"w Special circumstances not created by the owner or applicant
o Approval is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of
substantial propertyrights
Approval shall not constitute a grant of special privileges
inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the
vicinity and same zoning district
o Approval shall not be materially detrimental to those living in
the surrounding area or public welfare
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING O YV
Oro Valley Board of Adjustment
The Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing on
Tuesday, May 28, 2013, 3:00 p.m.
Oro Valley Town Hall, 11000 N. La Canada Dr.
Oro Valley, Arizona
Request for a Variance for lot 599 in Rancho Feliz to reduce the required front yard
setback from 30' to 26' for a garage addition, located at 9860 N. Calle Solano,
OV1013-03.
The hearing will be in the Town Council Chambers. The public is encouraged to attend and will
be invited to speak. Site plans are available for review during normal business hours at the Oro
Valley Town Hall, Development and Infrastructure Services Department. An agenda for this
meeting will be made available at least 24 hours prior to meeting time and can be viewed at .
www.orovalleyaz.gov. For questions and additional information, please contact Patty Hayes,
Zoning Plans Examiner, at (520) 229-4819 or phayes@orovalleyaz.gov.
DATE:
TIME:
BY:
SApermp1us\docs\0V1013-03\B of Notice 5-28-13.doc
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Oro Valley Board of Adjustment
The Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing on
Tuesday, May 28, 2013, 3:00 p.m.
Oro Valley Town Hall, 11000 N. La Canada Dr.
Oro Valley, Arizona
Request for a Variance for lot 599 in Rancho Feliz to reduce the required front
yard setback from 30' to 26' for a garage addition, located at 9860 N. Calle Solano,
OV1013-03.
Request for a Variance for lot 1 in Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 10 Parcel S to
reduce the required rear yard setback from 10' to 5' to build a new house, located
at 1078 W. Redlands Drive, OV1013-04.
Request for a Variance for lot 59 in the Verde Catalina Townhouses to reduce the
required rear yard setback from 10' to 0' and reduce the minimum distance
between buildings from 10' to 0' for a covered porch addition, located at 8335 N.
Verde Catalina Drive, OV1013-05.
Request for a Variance for lot 18 in Rivers Edge II to reduce the required rear yard
setback from 10' to 0' for a porch addition and spa, located at 10709 N. Hewitt
Place, OV1013-06.
Request for a Variance for lot 84 in Rancho Catalina to reduce the required rear
yard setback from 40' to 33' for a garage addition, located at 325 E. Four Horses,
OV1013-07.
The hearing will be in the Town Council Chambers. The public is encouraged to attend and
will be invited to speak. Site plans are available for review during normal business hours at the
Oro Valley Town Hall, Development and Infrastructure Services Department. An agenda for
this meeting will be made available at least 24 hours prior to meeting time and can be viewed
at www.orovalleyaz.gov. For questions and additional information, please contact Patty
Hayes, Zoning Plans Examiner, at (520) 229-4819 or phayes@orovalleyaz.gov.
POSTED: 05/13/2013
TIME: 8:15 AM
BY: rmf
r r +
STATE OF ARIZONA )
COUNTY OF PIMA )
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
ss.
Florence Hijazi, being first duly sworn, deposes and says that (s)he is the Publication
Advisor of THE DAILY TERRITORIAL, a daily newspaper printed and published in the County
of Pima, State of Arizona, and of general circulation in the City of Tucson, County of Pima,
State of Arizona and elsewhere, and the hereto attached:
NOTICE OF HEARING -TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
Rancho Feliz front yard setback
OV1013-04/OV1013-05/
OV1 01 3-06/OV1 01 3-07/May 28, 2013
was printed and published correctly in the regular and entire issue of said THE DAILY
TERRITORIAL for 1 issue(s); that was first made on the l 01h day of May, 2013, and the last
publication thereof was made on the 101h day of May, 2013; that said publication was made on
each of the following dates, to -wit:
5/10/13
At the Request of: Town of Oro Valley
Vby , Publication Advisor, subscribed and sworn to
before me this 20th day o ay, 2013.
Notary Publid in and for the County of Pima, State of Arizona
16. oFicAibEnL
ROBIN LTAHER
I M commission expires: 04/14/2017
INYM PIP� Ln ARCMConM.ExpkeSAPr414.2017
A
10 MAY 1, 2013
www.azbiz.com
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Oro Valley Board of Adjustment
The Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing on
Tuesday. May 28.2013, 3:00 p.m.
Oro Valley Town Hall, 11000 N. L. Canada Dr.
Oro Valley, Artemis
Request for a Variance for lot 599 In Rancho Feliz to reduce the required front
yard setback from 30'to 26'for a garage addition, located at 9860 N. Calla Solano,
OV1013-03.
Request for a Variance for lot 1 in Rancho Vlstoso Nefghborhood 10 Parcel S to
reduce the raqubad rear yard setback from 10'to Win build a new, house, located
.11078 W Redlands Drive, OV1013-04.
Request for a Variance for lot 59 in the Verde Catalina Townhouses to reduce
the required roar yard setback from 10' 10 0' and reduce the minimum distance
between building. from 10't0 O'tor a covered porch addition, located at 8335 N.
Verde Catalina Drive, OV1013-05.
Request for a Variance for lot 18 in Rivers Edge 11 to reduce the required ro.r yard
setback from 10'to O'for a Porch addition and spa, located at 10709 N. Howlit
Place, OV1013-06.
Request for a Variance for lot Ba in Rancho Catalina to reduce the required mar
yard setback from 40'to 33'fear a garage addition, located at 325 E. Four Hones,
OV1013-07.
The hearing will be in the Town Council Chambers. The public Is encouraged la attend and will be
imiled to speak. Silo plans are available for review during normal business hours at the Om Valley
Town Hag. Development and Infrastructure Services Defurtmem. An agenda for this meeting will
be made available al last 24 hours prior to meeting lime and an ba viewed al wvnv.onwlleyaL
gar. For questions and adddioml information. please cordact Ratty Hayes. Zoning Plans Esam-
iner, at (520) 229-4819 or pluyes'8:omealleyazgov.
PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial
May 10. 2013
s
N
WV��E
S