HomeMy WebLinkAboutHistorical Records - Miscellaneous (70)2
4
-5
23 i,.Ed.2d 592.
B. Substantial lntcrr_st.
We further submit that under existing Arizona law
those outside the city limits are less interested In a water Don, II
election. on. First we must examthe relation between the. city andl
he out -of -city users. in City of Phoenix v. Kazan, 97 P.2d 210,
G
5A Ariz. 470, at p. 474, the Arizona court said-
I
xt
"/ -an
j
8
! I_5_/ i?e have previously laic do
s j
certain rules governing municipal .,o
:9-
:i pora.tions operating �b l.ic uthit ,
}1 both within nc without their cokporawa
s
10
€± limits. They mEy be stated as
(a) a municipal corporation as a right
�
i�
to furnish water through its municipal
a
C
(
water plant to wonsurers without, a
($p
j44 :\fie a5 within, 4- c oar t,
E
fqj ai it (b) .:. _ie furnishing water13
r
gi i
�
in this manner the state coyporption
s
y:
<: ccm.,..ission has no ur aici,iol Y. re u-
14
if '_.are its actions towards consumers,
i
whether inside or ou_._',Je of sac.)
a. L _ .L
''q l" "` ;c) he le,g ure = ?-.°`
�
ami
,S
i� rrf which has Lh _._ : : _ .1rwjvla_ - - -
� r
j
and it has plenar,power in Coat
7
- except as . im d tn iii... fc `-/
i
r
consuners Ue
i1...1L �. to -
it can in be AnIsh such
, -
water to i c. -_ .`i
i', , tem o� —Zin_- _ Ms._- J
f
_ ..
subject v
I -
r .:cazo
_
n` — — - „
x
.-:f rose in the ciiy, Mwovar, havc an ar_clote right >✓o
�i
in water =.. _1o_e outside _+e city are sectip S only on a
u 25
voluntary La s. and, if the cityactsaJ y _... )._o'iriotory27
short, t..o city must. disc ,.e. =_._ 7 servie
i
__ _
..c.
seri_.._ on the in -city When eke in -city rates
{
-. . - tab.-._.. user
2
,1 . ,.. v increase ac. _' ding l yd p _ ..M_% alarmingil: because of
9 I
1
_ corresponding J -u11 131 i "l. ..-.-- wator is. i cc.
ligan t c , p payIi i It of a.. L -. .- -
G