Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOV120807AGENERAL NOTES 1. EXISTING ZONING IS C-1 (COMMERCIAL DISTRICT) AND TP (TECHNOLOGICAL PARK). 2. THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS PROJECT IS GEODETIC NORTH WHICH ESTABLISHES A BEARING FROM THE GLO BRASS DISC AT THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 34 TO THE BRASS DISC AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTER LINE OF TANGERINE ROAD AND THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 34 (BEING 7.8 FEET SOUTH OF THE UNMONUMENTED SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 34) SOUTH 00.33'22" EAST. 3. THE BASIS OF ELEVATION FOR THIS PROJECT IS A 1/2 INCH REBAR AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF LA CANADA DRIVE AND TANGERINE ROAD, DESCRIBED AS BENCH MARK BM10 AT STATION 149+15.75 - 66.69' LEFT PER TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLAN OF LA CANADA DRIVE PROJECT OV 30 04/05 27. ELEVATION BEING 2793.36 NAVD88 DATUM. 4. DEVELOPER WILL COVENANT TO HOLD TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, HARMLESS IN THE EVENT OF FLOODING. 5. DRAINAGE WILL NOT BE -ALTERED, DISTURBED OR OBSTRUCTED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL. 6. ACCESS ACROSS FLOOD PRONE AREAS TO BUILDING SITES WILL BE APPROVED BY THE TOWN ENGINEER AND SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DEVELOPER. 7. DESIGN SPEED IS 15 M.P.H., DESIGN VEHICLE IS SU-30. 8. APPROVED IMPROVEMENT PLANS AND APPROVED ASSURANCES WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS. 9. THE WATER DISTRICT FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT IS THE ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY COMPANY, WHICH HAS BEEN DESIGNATED AS HAVING AN ASSURED 100 YEAR WATER SUPPLY BY THE DIRECTOR OF WATER RESOURCES. 10. THE SEWAGE FROM THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL FLOW INTO THE SEWAGE SYSTEM OPERATED BY PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER DISTRICT. THE PROJECT WILL BE CONNECTED TO THE EXISTING 8" SEWER MAIN IN TANGERINE ROAD. 11. THE ON -SITE SANITARY .SEWERS, EXCEPT PUBLIC SEWERS WITHIN PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS OR, RIGHT-OF-WAY, WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON, A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT. 12. THIS PROJECT HAS 0 EXISTING AND 200t PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS, PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). 13. ANY WASTEWATER DISCHARGE INTO THE PUBLIC SANITARY SEWERAGE SYSTEM SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE INDUSTRIAL WASTE ORDINANCE (PIMA COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 1991-140, AS AMENDED). 14. A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. 15. MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF THE PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER TO ITS POINT OF CONNECTION TO THE PUBLIC SEWER IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNER OR BUSINESS OWNER'S ASSOCIATION. 16. MATERIALS WITHIN SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLES SHALL BE PLACED SO AS NOT TO INTERFERE WITH A VISIBILITY PLANE DESCRIBED BY TWO HORIZONTAL LINES LOCATED 30 INCHES AND 72 INCHES ABOVE FINLSHED GRADE OF THE ROADWAY SURFACE. 17. DRAINAGEWAYS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO APPROVED PLANS PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY PERMIT FROM THE TOWN ENGINEER AND/OR BUILDING OFFICIAL FOR THIS PROJECT. 18. A BUSINESS OWNER'S ASSOCIATION WILL BE FORMED TO ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTENANCE, CONTROL, SAFETY AND LIABILITY OF PRIVATE DRAINAGE WAYS, DRAINAGE EASEMENTS, COMMON AREAS AND PRIVATE SEWERS. 19. ANY RELOCATION, MODIFICATION, ETC. OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND/OR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS NECESSITATED BY THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL BE AT NO EXPENSE TO THE PUBLIC. 20. THE OWNER/DEVELOPER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALLOCAI NG 1% OF THE CONSTRUCTION COST TO PROVIDE FUNDING FOR PUBLIC ART. 21. REFER TO OV12-08-07 MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR CON 3TENCY IN DEVELOPMENT. 22. WATER SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED BY ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY. ACCEPTED I t��l�l _vet , TOWN CLERK, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, AZ DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR O v l�L- - O V ^ 711 WAS APPROVED BY THE MAYOR �AN COUNCIL ON THE '21 DAY OF S� 2010. DATED THISLDAY OF 2010. . A 6 % `-.c ORO VhrLEY TOWN CLERK /Lo -AS-ID � PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER APPROVAL 3945 EAST FORT LOWELL ROAD - SUITE 111 j - 68 o TUCSON, AZ 85712 w 520.795.1000 (FAX)520.322.6956 ck:� ENGINEERING COMPANY rickengineerir,.corn 0 _N Tucson Phoenix - San Diego - Sacramento - Riverside - Orange - San Luis Obispo - Bak-arsfield a D,EVELOPMENT PLAN FOR M �' �, -Z NOTES & CALCULATIONS FOR: PHASE I,- COMMERCIAL CENTER 1. THE GROSS AREA OF THIS DEVELOPMENT IS: 256,557 SF OR 5.89 AC NET BUILDING AREA IS: 24,000 SQUARE FEET. 2. PROPOSED USE: BANK, RETAIL & RESTAURANT OCCUPANCY GROUP: "B" - BUILDINGS 1 THROUGH 4 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: II-B 3. TOTAL AREA OF OPEN SPACE 49,906 SF MIN PERCENT OF NATURAL OPEN SPACE: 20.0 % 4. BUILDING AREA: BUILDING 1 4,200 SF BANK BUILDING 2 9,000 SF RETAIL/RESTAURA BUILDING 3 6,000 SF RETAIL/RESTAURA BUILDING 4 4,800 SF RETAIL/RESTAURA TOTAL GROSS FLOOR AREA= 24,000 SF 5. SITE/LOT AREA: OV12-08-07A N 3" = 1 MILE THIS PROJEC' LEGEND - CONTINUED OWNER/ DEVELOPER NbHM J , I TEM STANDARD DETAIL SYMBOL DESCO - MILLER, LLC, AN ARIZONA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY GRADING LIMIT n 1795 EAST SKYLINE DRIVE, SUITE 193 ROADWAY CENTERLINE - _ - _ - TUCSON, AZ 85718 LOCATION M A P PHONE: (520) 297-8929 TELEPHONE PEDESTAL E1 ATTN: JMAES HARDMAN A PORTION OF SECTION 34, T 11 S, R 13 E TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN-- = A DETAIL IDENTIFICATION, A LEGEND TOWN OF ORO VALLEY , PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA DETAIL REFERENCE 1 = SHEET SHOWING DETAIL _ 1 I TEM STANDARD DETAIL SYMBOL GROUTED RIP RAP DETAIL CROSS SECTION _ A.C. PAVING (REGULAR) SEE DETAIL A, SHEET 2 - BASIS OF ELEVATION CONCRETE PAVING -SEE DETAIL B, SHEET 2 - CAR POOL PARKING DESIGNATION - cP 6" VERTICAL CURB (TYPE 2) SD 209 INVERT ELEVATION - IE 6"x 12"CONCRETE HEADER - SD 213 RADE A E OF 6"EXTRUDED CURB TOP OF GRATE TG RIPARIAN APRON - FLOW LINE FL PROPERTY LINE FINISH SURFACE FS LANDSCAPE BUFFERYARD LIMITS -- RECLAIMED WATER RW BUILDING SETBACKS SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE SVT EASEMENT BOUNDARY T WALL F(It 1) REQUIRED/ALLOWED PROPOSED FINISH G (1) A F C EXIST CONTOUR LINE FAR: 0.30 BUILDING HEIGHT (H): 25' MAX EXCEPT BLDGS 7-8 WILL BE SINGLE STORY 20' HIGH MAX SETBACK NORTH: T-P 0' EAST: LA CANADA DRIVE 40' SOUTH: TANGERINE ROAD 50' WEST: R1-144 75' LANDSCAPE BUFFERYARDS: NORTH: T-P 0' EAST: LA CANADA DRIVE 30' SOUTH: TANGERINE ROAD 30' WEST: R1-144 0' 6. PARKING AND LOADING SPACES CALCULATIONS: MILLER RANCH - BUILDING AREA = 24,000 SF PARKING REQUIRED VEHICLE: ---------------- BANK 4,200 SF @ 3.5 SPACES/1,000 SF 15 SPACES RETAIL 10,800 SF @ 4 SPACES/1,000 SF 43 SPACES RESTAURANT 9,000 SF @ 10 SPACES/1,000 SF 90 SPACES ---------------- TOTAL = 148 SPACES HANDICAP: 100 TO 150 SPACES - 5 SPACES VAN ACCESSIBLE = 1 PER 8 HC SPACES = 1 SPACE CAR POOL: 10% OF 148 (ROUND) 15 SPACES BICYCLE(1 PER EACH 20 SPACES REQUIRED) 8 SPACES (10% CLASS I, 90% CLASS II) LOADING SPACES: 12' x 35' RETAIL/ RESTERAANT 24,000 2 SPACES 7. IMPERVIOUS AREA PHASE I/COMMERCIAL = 144,030 SO FT FOR ADDRESSING USE ONLY ---------- FINISH GRADE (2) AT FACE OF WALL FG(2) EXIST SPOT ELEVATION 5.80 ACRES OVER HANG OH FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION - 0.10 25' MAX WATER HARVESTING AREAS - TOP OF WALL NOTES & CALCULATIONS FOR: FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION PHASE 11- TECH PARK EXIST PAVEMENT EDGE - 0' EXIST PUBLIC SEWER LINE W/MH 40' MIN 1. THE GROSS AREA OF THIS DEVELOPMENT IS: 299,726 SF OR 6.88 AC EXIST WATERLINE TO BE ABANDONED - 50' MIN NET BUILDING AREA IS: 67,900 SQUARE FEET. EXIST WATERLINE W/VALVE 75' MIN 2. PROPOSED USE: GENERAL & MEDICAL OFFICES EXIST UNDERGROUND LINE EXIST GAS LINE 0' OCCUPANCY GROUP: "B"- BUILDINGS 5 THROUGH 8 EXIST TELEPHONE/TV CABLE LINE 30' MIN TYPE "B" EXIST OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE 30' MIN TYPE "B" TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-B EXIST FIBER OPTICS LINE 15' WASH PROTECTION APRON & RESTORED WASH 3. TOTAL AREA OF OPEN SPACE 74,931 SF MIN PROPOSED STORM DRAIN W/MH PERCENT OF NATURAL OPEN SPACE: 25.0 % PROPOSED PRIVATE SEWER W/MH PROPOSED PUBLIC SEWER W/MH 4. BUILDING AREA: 1ST FL 2ND FL TOTAL USE FLOW ARROW PARKING PROVIDED BUILDING 5 16,400 SF 16,200 SF 32,600 SF OFFICE FLOW CONDITIONS - ------------------ BUILDING 6 11,250 SF 11,250 SF 22,500 SF OFFICE FLOW ARROW FOR 0100= DISCHARGE - BUILDING 7 6,400 SF _______ 6,400 SF OFFICE BUILDING 8 6,400 SF _______ 6,400 SF OFFICE NATURAL OPEN SPACE PARKING SPACES PROVIDED TOTAL GROSS FLOOR AREA = 67,900 SF HANDICAP PARKING RETAINING WALL - REOUIRED/ALLOWED PROPOSED ENW 148 SPACES 9 SPACES 8 SPACES 16 SPACES 8 SPACES (2 PER BUILDING) (1 CL 1, 7 CL' I I ) 4 SPACES 5. SITE/LOT AREA: FAR: 0.30 BUILDING HEIGHT (H): 34' MAX SETBACK NORTH: TP 0' EAST: LA CANADA DRIVE 40' SOUTH: C-1 0 WEST: R1-144 102' LANDSCAPE BUFFERYARDS: NORTH: T-P 0' EAST: LA CANADA DRIVE 30' SOUTH: C-1 0' WEST: R1-144 0' 6. PARKING AND LOADING SPACES CALCULATIONS: MILLER RANCH - BUILDING AREA = 67,900 SF PARKING REQUIRED L SCRE 6.56 ACRES PROPOSED SLOPE - 0.23 CURB ACCESS RAMP -SD 207(UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) 34' MAX CLASS I BICYCLE PARKING CLASS II BICYCLE PARKING - 40' MIN SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE 102' MIN PROTECTIVE BARRICADE RAILING SUB -WATERSHED BOUNDARIES -�- - CONCRETE SIDEWALK - SD 200 - - 30' MIN TYPE "B" SECURITY BARRIER PROPOSED 100-YEAR FLOOD PRONE LIMITS -- 15' WASH PROTECTION APRON BUILDING EROSION SETBACK LINE - & RESTORED WASH EXISTING FENCE - EXIST RIGHT-OF-WAY - GRADING LIMIT - PARKING PROVIDED - - • 2750..... X 275LI ,E FS 52.00 TW 64.0 FFE 57.00 --S .............. W .............. (- w - UGE - --TEL/CATV- OHE F/0 0100 = CfS -- 5 VEHICLE: L SCRE 6.56 ACRES PROPOSED SLOPE - 0.23 CURB ACCESS RAMP -SD 207(UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) 34' MAX CLASS I BICYCLE PARKING CLASS II BICYCLE PARKING - 40' MIN SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE 102' MIN PROTECTIVE BARRICADE RAILING SUB -WATERSHED BOUNDARIES -�- - CONCRETE SIDEWALK - SD 200 - - 30' MIN TYPE "B" SECURITY BARRIER PROPOSED 100-YEAR FLOOD PRONE LIMITS -- 15' WASH PROTECTION APRON BUILDING EROSION SETBACK LINE - & RESTORED WASH EXISTING FENCE - EXIST RIGHT-OF-WAY - GRADING LIMIT - PARKING PROVIDED - - • 2750..... X 275LI ,E FS 52.00 TW 64.0 FFE 57.00 --S .............. W .............. (- w - UGE - --TEL/CATV- OHE F/0 0100 = CfS -- 5 VEHICLE: ------------------ ------------------ SECTION LINE GENERAL OFFICE HANNEL CROSSING -SECTIONAL INDICATED 54,500 SF @ 3 SPACES/1,000 SF 164 SPACES ZOPOSED SEWER W/CLEANOUT MEDICAL OFFICE 'WER KEYNOTES 1 13,400 SF @ 4.5 SPACES/1,000 SF 60 SPACES ------------ DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR TOTAL = 224 SPACES 224 SPA(TS n HANDICAP: 201 TO 300 SPACES - 7 SPACES 12 SPAC i aQ�o{8i 41LLER VAN ACCESSIBLE = 1 PER 8 HC SPACES = 1 SPACES 12 SPACl.> 7 286.4 BRUCE ,- c E °PATON PHASE 1- COMMERCIAL CENTER & CAR POOL: 10% OF 224 23 SPACES 24 SPACES �'?oNA \3' PHASE 11- TECH PARK FOR GENERAL NOTES CONTINUED AND BICYCLE(1 PER EACH 20 SPACES REQUIRED) 12 SPACES 12 SPACE : Djres 3/3N' BEING A PORTION O THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF (10% CLASS I, 90% CLASS II) (2 CL I, 10 CL II) REZONING CONDITION NOTES SEE SHEET 3 LOADING SPACES: 12' x 35' Q V 12 - O 8 - Q 7 A SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST GILA & OFFICES 67,900 SF 3 SPACES 3 SPACES OV9-G 4-02 SAL " RIVER MERIDIAN, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA. 7. IMPERVIOUS AREA: PHASE I I/TECHNOLOGY = 178,425 SO FT DATE: NOVEMEER 17, 2009 SCAL;:: N/A CONTOUR INTERVAL=N/A SHEET 1 OF 7 \\srv_tuc1\RicKS�andards\Bentley -2006\workspace\projects\CorpStds-2005-TUC\iplot \CorpStds-2005-TU`C.pen G:\3668_Corp\3668dp_01.dgn 20-AUG-2010 11-.35 CENTERLINE OF TANGERINE ROAD 1 1 r FOUND 20 D NAIL S 45° W & 1.1' FROM CALCULATED 1/4 CORNER FOUND 5/8 REBAR WITH TAG LS 7490 ON NORTH SOUTH MID -SECTION LINE & 50.04" FROM CALCULATED POSITION OF S 1/4 CORNER I 0 0 250' DRIVE-THRU SETBACK FROM RESIDENTIAL ZONE I i SEWER KEYNOTES O 450.0 LF PUBLIC 8" PVC @0.8% 0 295.0 LF PUBLIC 8" PVC @0.5% 0 214.5 LF PUBLIC 8-PVC @1.4% ® 143.8 LF PRIVATE 8" PVC @0.57. 0 380.0 LF PRIVATE 8-PVC Q1.67. 6Q 95.5 LF PRIVATE 8" PVC @0.8% 7� 350.0 LF PRIVATE 8-PVC 00.87. 480.0 LF PRIVATE 8-PVC 01.47. 73.0 LF PRIVATE 8"PVC @4.0% 13 195.0 LF PRIVATE 8-PVC @1.07. 14 5.0 LF PRIVATE 6-PVC 08.0% 15 61.0 LF PRIVATE 8-PVC @10.5% 16 33.0 LF PRIVATE 6"PVC @17.8% <*> 35.0 LF PRIVATE 6"PVC @9.1% 18 35.0 LF PRIVATE 6"PVC @9.4% 19 52.0 LF PRIVATE 6"PVC @7.4% 34.0 LF PRIVATE 6"PVC @8.2% 45.0 LF PRIVATE 6111PVC @9.0% 14.0 LF PRIVATE 6" PVC @7.2% 4 (S 1 CORNER SEC 34 TO SECTION CENTER 1/4 CORNER SEC 34) LINE N 0° 29'20" W 2641.60'(C) CENTER 1/4 CORNER SECTION 34 FOUND 1/2" REBAR, NO TAG J 1\1 S J 01 V 10 r 0 ACCEPTED BASED ON I R 1 ®1 ° °k WITH ORECORDCE -t- SET 1/2" REBAR WITH TAG, LS 17479 I SEE SHIRT 11 a . I : 4 I 0 a 0 oc Ul Z II rn W C� Z �x GIN 11, �C&,9 i `•3CC • S� °O'rR�'/ `s3a rq in' �RIM �ilil�r�:�r�►►at�d10� WITH _TAG. LS 17479 S COR. SECT ON 34 P SITION CAL ULATED d.p B SED ON RE ORD I FORMATION, OTHING (c&RZ ND..wwwwwwom V I S T � S 0 GG 4 TErl 1Y L 0T , 2 i rl� RI-30 THE BASIS OF ELEVATION FOR THIS SURVEY IS A 1/2 INCH REBAR AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF LA CANADA DRIVE AND TANGERINE ROAD, DESCRIBED AS BENCH MARK BM10 AT STATION 149+15.75 - 66.69' LEFT PER TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLAN OF LA CANADA DRIVE PROJECT OV 30 04/05 27. ELEVATION BEING 2793.36 NAVD88 DATUM. LINE TABLE NAME DIRECTION LENGTH ---- ------ L1 S 30014 08„ W 53.54 L2 N 59045' 52" W 5.00 L3 S 30014' 08" W 50.00 L4 S 89024' 10" W 44.48 L5 S 0033`22" E 60.00 CURVE TABLE NAME DELTA RADIUS -ARC ---- C1 3004731" 483.23 259.70 C2 16027'50" 638.15 183.37 SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLES (SVT) LOCATION SPEED FAR - SIDE NEARSIDE - TANGERINE ROAD 45MPH (POSTED) 151x 470' 15'x 600' LA CANADA DRIVE 40MPH (POSTED) 15'x 370' 15'x 480' PAAL' S ( MAJOR) 1 O' x 70' 10' x 100' PAAL'S (MINOR) 10'x 30' 10'x 30' RAISED MEDIAN ISLANDS 15'x 30' 3945 EAST FORT LOWELL ROAD - SUITE 111 J -3668 a, TUCSON, AZ 85712 w 520.795.1000 (FAX)520.322.6956 Eke ENGINEERING COMPANY rickengineering.com 0 o Tucson Phoenix San Diego Sacramento - Riverside - Orange - San Luis Obispo - Bakersfield PUBLIC R14NHOLE DATA MH #A RIM 90.2 MH #B RIM 90.4 8" W IE 78.5 8" NE IE 80.3 8"'EIE78.6 8"W IE80.1 MH #C RIM 95.6 MH #D RIM 97.5 8" E IE 83.5 8" NE IE 84.4 8" SW IE 83.3 8" W IE 84.2 JNSJB01 V1 Dr0 R111 _1144 SEE SHEC 4 0 0 nnnnnn _ o u 1wI a I pa J � � �IV l� tiL ■ . MEN ■ Mid! r Ilo JIN] SJE-101 V 10 r 0 U N S U rr-'-'j 0 1 V 10rEJ JNGJr 1 V 10r0 D e d d D FOUND 1/2 "REBAR a R WITH TAG, LS 12122 FOUND 1/2 "REBAR FOUND%2"REBAR I ON PROPERTY LINE WITH TAG, LS 12122 WITH TAG, LS 12122 a E E S H E E CT AT PARCEL CORNER NO°32'22'W 2548.96' ON PROPERTY LINE o ? nnn nnn Q �a I a ZL94 N774L427nnnnn�� ZZ-0 Z02 I._ ail i��©�YY\����YYI�II�� �lil�lf■�■� � ■■■■■■ ■■■r� SO°33'22" E 1985.70' v C Lwrl n^ - too J1\1SJ8101 V 10r0 SCALE: 1" = 100' FOUND%2" REBAR 7!56ii�l �, FOUND%2" REBAR WITH TAG, LS 12122 � WITH TAG, LS 10046 , 100 50 0 100, AT PARCEL CORNER FOUND 1/2"REBAR SET 1/2 "REBAR NO TAG, ON PROPERTY LINE �, Y u WITH TAG, LS 17479 a, XQ o Ltd x� W e Z El Z tl� to -� BLDG 13 BLDG 1 1 00 o°o 0 0 1/4 CORNER = FOUND 2.5" j GLO BRASS 1 DISK S 0° 3322"E 2638.08'(C) S 0° - 9'(R 1) 1 4 COR R �3�'"�R2� a L C A A BASISF BEARING IJ JN1 v I J S)I 1 V 1 O r 0 08_-`rMJ SC '33 07' E(R2I W LI - 38 -°o'tR2j - - - - - - - - - 3 MIN. 777 IF AJACENT 4"CONCRETE TO WALL SLAB TOWN Or O R O V A L L r Y SHADED AREA IN FOUND 1/2" REBAR NO TAG BICYCLE LOCKER BY AMERICAN BICYCLE SECURITY COMPANY OR EQUAL - MODEL 302 SCREENED AREA IN FRONT OF BICYCLE SPACE r �1>> �1 r J l� O �1 r� FRONT OF BICYCLE INDICATES 5'-0" CLEAR SPACE - TYP. PARKING SPACE 6'-3.5" 5'-0" 2.51C CLASS II BICYCLE SPACES --- - INDICATES 5' CLEAR „ POST PARKING AREA PER SPACE TYP C.O.T. DEVELOPMENT STANDARD NO.2-09.0. COMPACTED SUBGRADE. INSTALL PER - - - - NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING SPACES SCARIFY, MOISTEN MANUFACTURER'S° (AS REQUIRED) AND 4"ABC PLAN �\ �� 6"CONCRETE REINFORCED RECOMMENDATIONS PROVIDE 'SAFETY-VIEW"GRILL RECOMPACT TOP 8" W/6"x6'1xW 1.4xW 1.4 WWF. WINDOW SECURITY DOOR TO 95% SEE PLANS FOR JOINT *NOTE: FINAL PAVING SECTION MAY VARY DEPENDING ON LOCATIONS. 6' 5' FIELD ANALYSIS OF ESTABLISHED SUBGRADE. NOTE: LIGHTING FOR BICYCLE PARKING AREA WILL BE �P PROVIDED BY BUILDING SIDE POLE LIGHTS "AC P A V I N G SECT I ON CLASS "A" CONCRETE -- PRIVATE MANHOLE DATA MH # 1 RIM 99.5 MH #2 RIM 98.8 MH #3 RIM 04.8 6" NW IE 90.7 8" N IE 91.7 8" N IE 94.7 8" E IE 90.7 8" W IE 91.5 8"' S IE 94.5 8"SW IE 90.5 MH #4 RIM 11.0 MH #5 RIM 12.3. MH #6 RIM 23.5 8"NE IE 01.8 8"N IE 04.9 8"N IE 14.1 8" S IE 01.6 8" SW IE 04.7 8" S IE 13.9 8" W IE 01.8 PRIVATE CLEANOUT DATA CO #A CO #B CO #C CO #D CO #E RIM 00.5 RIM 00.2 RIM 99.5 RIM 00.5 RIM 00.4 IE 93.9 IE 93.5 IE 94.0 IE 93.1 IE 94.0 CO #F CO #G CO #H CO #I RIM 05.5 RIM 03.4 RIM 05.6 RIM 09.5 ,IE 98.9 IE 97.9 IE 02.2 IE 02.6 NO SCALE PAVEMENT SECTION 0 �o 'v (4500 PSI MIN) n BICYCLE PARKING SIDE END �� 4„ABC u DTL: BIKEPARKING NO SCALE ZONING LINE TABLE ZONING LINE TABLE ZONING LINE TABLE COMPACTED SUBGRADE. SCARIFY, NAME DIRECTION LENGTH NAME DIRECTION LENGTH NAME DIRECTION LENGTH MOISTEN(AS REQUIRED)AND ---- ZL1 ---------------- S 890 28; 45;; --------- W 338.71 ---- ZL26 ---------------- S 30 37� 56�1 --------- E 50.72 ---- ZL51 ---------------- S 44a a0� 39� --------- E 14.52 RECOMPACT TOP 8" TO 95% ZL2 S 4 51 24 E 19.11 ZL27 S 43 09 07 W 42.03 ZL52 S 25 06 2$ E 17.98 CONCRETE PAVING ZL3 S 41 ° 07' 04" E 41.07 ZL28 S 1 ° 57' 41 " E 54.68 ZL53 S 250 20' 58" W 94.61 ZL4 S 14038'04" E 79.30 ZL29 S 34015'10" W 21.80 ZL54 S 20059'07" W 23.49 B NO SCALE ZL5 S 17035'33" W 22.34 ZL30 S 1603141" W 25.84 ZL55 S 37035'40" W 16.49 ZL6 S 42°45'38" E 18.80 ZL31 S 28°27'50" W 51.57 ZL56 S 62°28'20" W 20.23 ZL7 S 17°37`47" W 63.46 ZL32 S 0008'00" E 8.62 ZL57 S 48055'17" W 27.65 ZL8 S 43°21'48" W 22.05 ZL33 S 57042`45" E 19.28 ZL58 ZL59 S 29052'20" W 12.42 ZL9 ZL10 S 27°06'S9" S 3020'02" E E 75.87 30.62 ZL34 ZL35 S 38051'44" S 8°45`39" E W 30.62 43.85 ZL60 S S 3058'21" 45°12'29" W E 42.84 9.27 ZL11 S 49033'14" E 35.69 ZL36 ZL37 S 24012'44" S 27010'40" E W 26.20 32.89 ZL61 ZL62 N N 66°24'20" 84038'39" E E 10.61 16.85 6"TYPE 2 VERTICAL ZL12 71 13 S 88012'36" S 5025114" E W 14.25 39 77 ZL38 S 0009'46" W 41.53 ZL63 S 69022'24" E 14.96 36"' CURB PER SD 209 ZL14 S 17021`12" E 50.41 ZL39 S 23030'30" W 18.14 ZL64 S 27008'21" W 18.63 ZL15 S 2059`49" W 28.39 ZL40 S 36002'33" W 23.51 ZL65 S 19052'05" E 48.61 ZL16 S 28028'19" E 28.39 ZL41 S 14041'24" W 106.77 ZL66 S 22"57'18" W 48.60 61LONG PRECAST WHEELSTQP 1/2 "BITUMINOUS ZL17 S 36052`28" W 39.49 ZL42 S 2052'46" W 124.08 ZL67 S 14010'12" W 29.46 CENTERED IN PARKING SPACE. JOINT FILLER ZL 18 S 1 ° 48' 46" W E 46.83 ZL43 ZL44 S S 520 303241" 55 25 W W 30. 35 8.26 ZL68 ZL69 S S 430 752322 58' 42" E W 19.13 47.64 SECURE PER MANUFACTURER'S ZL19 ZL20 S S 6020'01" 5054`44" E 34.96 24.72 ZL45 S 33038, 04 E 18.39 ZL70 S 410 34 22„ W 13.01 RECOMMENDATIONS. SIDEWALK WHERE 2L21 S 2018'08" W 74.46 ZL46 S 8404734" E 74.62 ZL71 S 1804439" W 51.24 °.'.`:SHOWN ON PLAN ZL22 S 40:37'26" E 11.35 ZL47 ZL48 S S 33°4757" 19o18f37 E W 15.17 170.37 ZL72 ZL73 S S 4005742" 51046f41"' W W 117.72 51.57 ° , ... t z:._" ZL23 719d S C 35°54'29" 11°n� 9i W W 50.10 Rr,.R4 ZL49 S 49 25.12 W 21.79 ZL74 S 17 27.50.. W 3.11 C C O N C R E T E WHEEL STOP a PATONis PHASE I- COMMERCIAL CENTER & DTL: wSTOP01 NO SCALE�72pNA \•S* PHASE 11- TECH PARK pyres 3�3ti1 BEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF O V 12 - O 8 - O 7 A SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST GILA & OV9-04-02 SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA. DATE: NOVEMBER 17, 2009 SCALE: 1"= 100" CONTOUR ,It ,TERVAL= 1' SHEET 2 OF 7 01 \\srv-tuc1\RickStandards\Bentley-2006\workspace\projects\CorpStds-2005_TUC\iplot \CorpStds_2005_TUC.pen G.\3668_Corp\3668dp_02.dgn 20-AUG-2010 10.39 REZONING CONDITIONS (OV9-04-02) I. LABEL THE AREA ADJACENT TO THE ROUNDABOUT ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY TO SPECIFY THAT A FUTURE CONNECTION TO THE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL HOMES (WEST OF THE WASH, PARCELS 219-470-04B, 04C, 04A, 050 AND I 70A) WILL BE ACHIEVED VIA A CROSS -ACCESS EASEMENT. 2• BECAUSE THE NEW REZONING DOES NOT APPEAR TO FOLLOW ANY KNOWN PROPERTY BOUNDARIES, A RECORDABLE EXHIBIT WHICH DELINEATES THE RE -ZONING BOUNDARY LINE IN A SURVEYABLE METES & BOUNDS MUST BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO REVIEW BY MAYOR AND COUNCIL. 3. PART 1-C HYDROLOGY, PROVIDE DETAILS FOR PEAK DISCHARGES USING APPROXIMATE METHODS SUCH AS THE REGIONAL AREA VERSUS DISCHARGE GRAPHS. PROVIDING JUST A SUMMARY TABLE IS NOT ADEQUATE. PLEASE PROVIDE REVIEWING STAFF WITH THE SUPPLEMENTAL BACK-UP DATA AND REFER TO SAID DATA IN THE TEXT OF THE REPORT. 4. RESTORATION OF THE ENTIRE WASH ABUTTING THE LENGTH OF THE WEST SIDE PROPERTY LINE MUST ACHIEVE THE FOLLOWING: A. MIMIC ONSITE RIPARIAN CONDITIONS EXISTING PRIOR TO DISTURBANCE TO CREATE A NATURAL RIPARIAN HABITAT. B. PROVIDE DENSE QUALITIES OF DESERT NATURAL VEGETATION, SPECIFICALLY FROM ON SITE VEGETATION. C. A RESTORATION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN PROCESS. 5. THE FOLLOWING ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY COMMENTS MUST BE ACHIEVED: A. ANY AND ALL WELLS ON THE ENTIRE PROPERTY WILL BE ABANDONED PER ADWR STANDARDS. B. ANY GROUNDWATER RIGHTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROPERTY WILL BE EXTINGUISHED THROUGH ADWR AND DOCUMENTATION OF THIS TO BE SUPPLIED TO OVWU. C. A 20 FOOT BY 20 FOOT SITE WILL BE DEDICATED TO OVWU FOR A PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE STATION (PRVS) WITHIN THE WESTERN PORTION OF THE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT, ALONG THE ALIGNMENT OF THE INTERNAL WATER MAIN. THE PRVS SHALL BE THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONSTRUCT ALONG WITH THE ONSITE WATER MAIN LOOP. D. A 12 INCH WATER MAIN WILL BE INSTALLED FROM NORTH TO SOUTH ALONG THE WESTERN PAAL WITHIN THE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT. THIS IS IN ADDITION TO THE 8 INCH LOOPS WHICH WILL SURROUND THE BUILDING GROUPS AND CONNECT TO THE AFOREMENTIONED 12 INCH MAIN. E. THE EXISTING 16 INCH MAIN IN THE TANGERINE ROAD RIGHT OF WAY WHICH THIS DEVELOPMENT BORDERS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO AND EXTENDED ON TO THIS PROPERTY AND TO THE WESTERN PROPERTY LINE, 7.5 NORTH OF THE RW LINE. A 15 FOOT EASEMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE OVWU FOR THIS AND ALL MAINS. THE PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED 12 INCH MAIN WILL CONNECT TO THE 16 INCH MAIN. F. THE 12 INCH MAIN.SHALL CONNECT TO THE 12 INCH MAIN IN SUNKIST. IF THIS MAIN HAS NOT BEEN CONSTRUCTED AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS DEVELOPMENT, A 12 INCH MAIN IN SUNKIST FROM LA CANADA WEST TO THE TOWN BOUNDARY WILL BE THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO BUILD. 6. ALL APPLICABLE STANDARD NON -PAD REZONING CONDITIONS PER RESOLUTION (R) 90-21 MUST BE ADDRESSED. 7. A. ALL PERMITTED, ACCESSORY AND CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USES UNDER THE C-1 ZONE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, EXCEPT THOSE USES INCOMPATIBLE WITH THE OFFICE PARK AND WHICH WOULD BE INCOMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOODS, ARE ALLOWABLE USES. B. THE FOLLOWING PERMITTED USES SHALL BE LIMITED TO 10,000 SQUARE FEET PER USE: GROCERY STORE, FURNITURE STORE, VIDEO STORE, AND FABRIC STORE. C. PERMITTED USES: ON THE C-1 PORTION OF THE PROJECT ARE ALL COMPATIBLE OFFICE PARK USES, WHICH INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED GENERAL NOTES - CONTINUED 23. THE FOLLOWING UTILITIES WILL PROVIDE SERVICE TO THIS DEVELOPMENT: (A) ELECTRIC TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY (B) GAS SOUTHWEST GAS COMPANY (C) WATER ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY COMPANY (D) SEWER PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER (E) TELEPHONE QWEST COMMUNICATIONS (F) FIRE PROTECTION GOLDER RANCH FIRE DEPARTMENT (G) CABLE TELEVISION COMCAST 24. THE PROPERTY OWNER, HIS SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS AGREE TO: 1) KEEP ALL REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS MAINTAINED IN A WEED FREE, TRASH FREE CONDITION. 2) REPLACE ANY DEAD PLANT MATERIALS WITHIN 90 DAYS. 3) MAINTAIN THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IN A PROPER WORKING ORDER. 25. REFER TO OV12-08-07 MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR CONSISTENCY IN DEVELOPMENT. 26. DEVELOPMENT PLANS WILL BE SUBMITTED FOR COMMERCIAL LOTS OR PADS PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY PERMITS BY THE TOWN ENGINEER AND/OR BUILDING OFFICIAL. 27. CROSS ACCESS EASEMENTS FOR ALL LOTS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED AS DOCUMENTED IN THE CC&R's. 28. THE PARKING AND LOADING SPACES PROVIDED WITHIN THE MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN, AS REFLECTED IN THE SPACES PROVIDED WITHIN INDIVIDUAL LOTS AND WITHIN COMMON AREAS, SHALL MEET THE PARKING AND LOADING ZONE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 27 OF OVZCR FOR THE USES SHOWN ON THE PLAN. AS THE INDIVIDUAL LOTS ARE DEVELOPED PER AN APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN, THE MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN SHALL BE AMENDED AND UPDATED, AS APPROPRIATE, TO REFLECT THE BUILD -OUT OF THE PROJECT OVER TIME AND EACH ITERATION SHALL MEET THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 27, OR THE APPLICANT SHALL FOLLOW THE STANDARD PROCEDURES FOR SEEKING AND JUSTIFYING A VARIANCE. 29. FIRE HYDRANTS CONNECTED TO AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY OF 1,500 GPM FOR FIRE PROTECTION SHALL BE INSTALLED AND IN SERVICE PRIOR TO COMBUSTIBLE MATERIAL DELIVERY TO THE SITE. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION OFFICE TRAILERS ARE CONSIDERED COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS. 30. APPROVED FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS SHALL BE INSTALLED AND IN SERVICE PRIOR TO COMBUSTIBLE MATERIAL DELIVERY TO THE SITE. 31. AN APPROVED AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED THROUGHOUT EACH BUILDING. 32, TEMPORARY STREET SIGNS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT EACH STREET INTERSECTION WHEN CONSTRUCTION OF NEW ROADWAYS ALLOWS PASSAGE OF VEHICLES. ALL STRUCTURES UNDER CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED WITH AN APPROVED ADDRESS. TO THE FOLLOWING LIST: PRINTING SHOP, UPS STORE 0R SIMILAR, 8/1 RESTAURANTS, BANK WITH DRIVE -THROUGH. D. PROHIBITED USES; CHURCHES, DRUG STORE, GAS STATION, HARDWARE STORE, DRIVE-THROUGH/DRIVE-IN RESTAURANTS, ANIMAL HOSPITAL, CONVENIENCE STORE, PET GROOMING, AUTO REPAIR, FUNERAL HOME, AUTOMOBILE PARTS STORE, RADIO STATION, APPLIANCE REPAIR STORE. 8. THE MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA RATIO OF C-1, COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AREA WILL BE WHAT IS ALLOWED IN T-P, TECHNOLOGICAL PARK DISTRICT WHICH co CONFORMS TO THE GENERAL PLAN ELEMENTS. 9. THE RIGHT-OF-WAY WILL BE DEDICATED TO THE TOWN UPON EFFECTIVE DATE OF REZONING. 10. THE NORTHERN THREE BUILDINGS OF THE TECHNOLOGY PARK (T-P) DISTRICT WILL HAVE A MAXIMUM OF 28 FEET WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE APPURTENANCES NECESSARY FOR THE ELEVATOR SHAFT (WHICH WILL BE MINIMIZED BUT WILL NOT EXCEED 34 FEET IN HEIGHT) AND ANY SPECIAL o' ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES SHALL NOT BE MORE THAN 4 FEET ABOVE THE , ALLOWED 28 FOOT HEIGHT. o E V o, C 3945 EAST FORT LOWELL ROAD - SUITE 111 J -3668 TUCSON, AZ 85712 w 520.795.1000 (FAX)520.322.6956 ov ENGINEERING COMPANY rickengineering.com 0 rvTucson Phoenix - San Diego - Sacramento - Riversided - Orange - San Luis Obispo - BakerAd 23'-8" 22'-4" 8" - - - ------ -- ---- ------- ------- -------- -------- ----- ------ -------- r o a - 10-TYPE 'B" POST BARRICADES • PER SO 106 6' HIGH MASONRY SCREEN WALL �1. PER ARCHITECT PLANS, STUCCO C AND PAINT TO MATCH BUILDING, • 3 • PER ARCHITECT'S SPECS. DOUBLE TRASH ENCLOSURE DTL:TRASHDOUBLE NO SCALE 414'%3/8" STEEL TUBE POST EMBEDDED IN CONCRETE. PAINT TO MATCH COLOR OF BUILDING, PER ARCHITECT'S SPECS. -,CONSTRUCT DOOR FRAMES USING 31x3'x1/4"STEEL ANGLES- WELDED.FACED W/TYPE B METAL DECK. PAINT TO MATCH COLOR OF BUILDING, PER ARCHITECT'S SPECS. -o" PATON G PHASE I - COMMERCIAL CENTER & _2„ F p72ONA �•S PHASE I1- TECH PARK Ices 3/3N BEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF O V 12 - 0 8 - 0 7 A SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST GILA & OV9-04-02 SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA. DATE: NOVEMBER 17, 2009 SCALE: N/A CONTOUR INTERVAL= N/A SHEET 3 OF 7 \\srv-tucl\Rick'tandards\Bentley _2006\workspace\projects\CorpStds-2005-TUC\iplot \CorpStds_2005-TUC.pen G.\3668-Corp\3668dp_03.dgn 20-AUG-2010 NOTES: - 1. FLO-CARD+PLUS (WALL MOUNT) HIGH CAPACITY CATCH BASIN INSERTS ARE AVAILABLE TO FIT NON-STANDARD OR "ULTIMATE" COMBINATION CATCH BASIN SIZES AND BYPASS STYLES (SEE SPECIFIER CHART). REFER TO THE FLO-GARD+PLUS (FRAME SUPPORT MOUNT) INSERT FOR DEVICES TO FIT BASKET INDUSTRY STANDARD SIZE FLAT GRATED CATCH BASIN INLETS. CATCH BASIN (FLAT GRATE 2. FILTER INSERT SHALL HAVE BOTH AN STYLE) 'INITIAL" FILTERING BYPASS AND T 0 P VIEW OUTLET PIPE ULTIMATE" HIGH -FLOW BYPASS FEATURE. INITIAL BYPASS 3. FILTER ASSEMBLY SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED FROM STAINLESS STEEL GRATE GASKET (TYPE 304). ULTIMATE 4. ALLOW A MINIMUM OF 2'-0" BYPASS CLEARANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM OF GRATE AND TOP OF INLET OR OUTLET DEBRIS TRAP �r PIPES(S). REFER TO THE FLO-GARD `" SUPPORT INSERT FOR 'SHALLOW" INSTALLATIONS. BASKET ABSORBENT 5. FILTER MEDIUM SHALL BE RUBBERIZER POUCHES INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED IN LINER ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS. OUTLET PIPE SIDE VIEW r;: � CATCH BASIN/FILTER INSERT CURB OPENII 3' PER PLAN 0.5' TYPE "B" POST BARRICADE PER SD 106 (TYP) H DEPRESSED CURB NO SCALE NO SCALE 'ME F i_ 13'-4" 8„ 121_011 8„ 00 4'-0" 4'-0" .......... ,. .... ........................... ......................... .. 7-TYPE 'B"POST BARRICADES 0 o Z PER SD 106 N � - 6' HIGH MASONRY SCREEN WALL o PER ARCHITECT PLANS, STUCCO AND PAINT TO MATCH BUILDING, Q' B PER ARCHITECT'S SPECS. • 0 2 N 4'x4'3/3/8" STEEL TUBE POST EMBEDDED IN CONCRETE. PAINT TO MATCH COLOR OF BUILDING, a' PER ARCHITECT'S SPECS. o o CONSTRUCT DOOR FRAMES USING 3'%1/4"STEEL ANGLES -WELDED. 3'x FACED W/TYPE B METAL DECK. PAINT TO MATCH COLOR OF BUILDING, PER ARCHITECT'S SPECS. QTY 4-1" DIA x 6" LONG GALVANIZED PIPE FLUSH WITH CONCRETE. SINGLE TRASH ENCLOSURE 17 DTL:SINGLETRASH 1 � � DISABLED PLATE OR PERMIT ONLY DO NOT BLOCK ACCESS AISLE ORO VALLEY TOWN CODE 11-4-3.A VANACCESSIBLE BUILDING FACE z TRUNCATED "' DOMES Z H=6" Ln _ NO SCALE NOTES: 1.4 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE GIVEN IN INCHES. 2.0 0.5 2. THESE SIGNS ARE NOT AVAILABLE THROUGH THE TOWN, BUT CAN BE PURCHASED AT 2.0 PRIVATE BARRICADE AND SIGN COMPANIES. 0.5 3. BOTTOM OF "RESERVED PARKING" SIGN SHALL BE 7' ABOVE FINISH GRADE. 5.0 4. OMIT "VAN ACCESSIBLE" SUPPLEMENTAL PLAQUE IN STANDARD DISABLED PARKING SPACES. 0.3 1.0 0.3 to 0.3 1.0 1.2 0.5 HANDICAP SIGN i7' MIN FROM BOTTOM 6"VERTICAL CONCRETE OF SIGN TO F.G. (TYP) CURB SIDEWALK H 1 1 1 1 H=6" . H=6" Ln PARKING SPACES NO SCALE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR it M I L L T RJR' -111 X1 A N C H 10-39 C 24' PAAL VARIES 5.5< ,2' MIN 3 10* 6,t 17 t_\ 17, PARKING STALL 5.5' 5' 13't 5' 9' 621t 6 "iip 2' SCREEN WALL PER ARCHITECTURAL AND SCREEN WALL PER EXISTING GROUND 8�� TYPE 4 MODIFIED CATCH STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS 3' ARCHITECTURAL AND 6"" CLASS 'B"' CONCRETE BASIN W/6 EF-1 GRATES CURB OPENING WALL K OPENING 4 TYPE 4 MODIFIED CATCH CURB BASIN W/2 EF-1 GRATESWALL STRUCTURAL K AWINGS N t2500 PSI MIN) W/FIBER MESH ADDITIVE PER SD 309 .. PER SD 309 OPENING OPENING 4 ,� GROUTED(I 3°p RIP RAP 4 ,;. o . I GROUTED I F qTc �j y RIP RAP 4 `S'T •r HAND PLACED ANGULAR ROCK �9�. A� Q \ a; Q�P� _ 3'°� RIP RAP, D50= 8" MIN Q�R 3;1 �� \�/ EMBED ROCK TO A DEPTH 19 Q 3� 22.4 LF 12" PVC OF %2 D50 QER 6"TYPE 2 CURB PER VERTICAL SD 209 2 LAYERS DUMPED ANGULAR ROCK P 6"TYPE 2 VERTICAL _ ,\\ RIP RAP PAD, D50=8"MIN, T=16"MIN CURB PER SD 209 OVER 1 LAYER MIRAFI 140 FILTER 2 LAYERS DUMPED ANGULAR ROCK FABRIC OR EQUIVALENT CB CROSS SECTION RIP RAP PAD, D50=8" MIN, T=16" MIN OVER 1 LAYER MIRAFI 140 FILTER CROSS SECTION GROUTED R I P RAP SLOPE TREATMENT I NO SCALE FABRIC OR EQUIVALENT CA NO SCALE DTL : GRRSLOPES-PC NO SCALE �e FR p �qN 7' 8.5' 24' 17' 8' 14' PROPOSED Q�P� PROPOSED SIDEWALK 6 PAAL PARKING STALL 6 SIDEWALK BUILDING 7 BUILDING 5 A AC PAVEMENT FFE 04.20 Q FFE 05.60 PER PLAN 2 PER PLAN PER_PLA.. SLOPE PER PLAN ::.......: : \ \\ \ CONCRETE SIDEWALK 6"TYPE 2 VERTICAL PER SD 200 (TYP) CURB PER SD 209 CROSS SECTION NOT EREFERENCE C C FORE:ONLY, SEPARATE BUILDING NQ SCALE PERMIT REQUIRED. RETAINING WALL SECTION J DTL: RETWALL04 NO SCALE 1 _5 f x 8 1/ x 1/4, STEEL PLATE LINTEL � 61t VARIES 281* VARIES E 8 " M I N 5� VARIES VARIES VARIES 5`-10' tijgTc 2' MIN SCREEN WALL 8'-12' 2' MIN v H F�,IST PROPOSED Qv� 1 /' PROPOSED 6 6 BUILDING 8 �� �\\ BUILDING 7 ph• v Qv 3:'� F�' BOTTOM OF HE 06.30 ph• v �Q� �? Q •,� �� 3• FFE 04.20 5/. M_IN <v� Q WALL ELEV. — OPENING - �7779 VARIES w � \ V461£S ��'' \ ��\' \\ @ INVERT GRADE Q a . � t TYP ) \'X pLAN \X\ PROPOSED FL P „ „ 4' MAX PROPOSED 18"PIPE 8 MIN CLASS B 18"PIPE (2500 PSI MIN) CROSS SECTION CF No SCALE CROSS SECTION CD CONCRETE FOOTING TYPICAL WALL OPENING DTL: WALL OPENING NO SCALE C' VARIES 6' 3' 28' VARIES 301t 5' 6' 31 28' -10 6/1 DRIVEWAY 51TO 13't 6„ DRIVEWAY -0 42" HIGH SECURITY 42" HIGH SECURITY PROPOSED ING D10.006 v BARRIER BARRIER AC PAVEMENT Q X BFE I 42"HIGH SECURITY TYPE 4 CATCH BASIN RETAINING WALL PER PER PLAN RETAINING WALL PER BARRIER W/2 EF-1 GRATE X PER SD 309 AC PAVEMENT Q ARCHITECTURAL AND OPENING N PER PLAN ° ARCHITECTURAL AND CURB 2 STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS I GROUTED �\ \ \" STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS OPENING PER PLAN , 4 RIP RAP \\ \\ \\ J GROUTED �•� WALL " '�\ `\ 6TYPE 2 VERTICAL 4 RIP RAP r '\ OPENING CURB PER SD 209 F4 pER 12'� pVC 6"TYPE 2 VERTICAL 0.5/ FG 03• - \ t) 5 t°jgN 15 L V\ ��,� ��` CURB PER SD 209 \\ \ \\ F� l DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR C G CROSS SECTION — 2 LAYERS DUMPED ANGULAR ROCK RIP � ��� l v 2 674 M . ��� NO SCALE RAP INLET PROTECTION D5()=8" MIN, T=16"MIN OVER 1 LAYER MIRAFI 140 CROSS S E C T I 0 N PBRUCE ATON . PHASE 1 - COMMERCIAL CENTER & FILTER FABRIC OR EQUIVALENT C E NO SCALE Sp. PHASE 11- TECH PARK F�72pNA kA /re8 3945 EAST FORT LOWELL ROAD -SUITE 111 J-3668 BEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF TUCSON, AZ 85712 O V 12 — 0 8 — 0 7 A SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST GILA & 520.795.1000 (FAX)520.322.6956 OV9-04-02 SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA. ENGINEERING COMPANY rickengineering.com TU°enix- SanDiego- Sacramento -Riverside- Qrange San LuisObispo- Bakersfield r DATE: NOVEMBER 17, 2009 SCALE: N/A CONTOUR INTERVAL= N/A SHEET 4 OF 7 \ \SrV-TUC I \r� ICKJTU1l(J(J` C]S \0enT ley_COUb \WUrKSpUCe \prOJeCTS \l,Orp�)TGS-000S- I Ul, \Ip IOT \l.OrpJTCIS_CUOD_ 1 uu.pen U: \Jbbo_1lur p \,D000Up-U'f.(Jgi 1 CU-AUU-LU IU u:')S j 7 POSEDCi'ON G d, PRO V J ULAZO- �11 RY� PER oo 7• CASE 0 9- 7 I- UN - 2 90.• x • 2 aP ­_1 C�( s "16 4" Fh . I . , _r "', w � RESTAURANT A, , -// i , ,,;'GFA 9,000 SF "I L! -'f P )POSE 00-Y HEIGHT 25"MAX VO-YEAR C _E 00.50 LOOD FLOOD P IMITS PAC9.8 LIMITS 1 SRY V/ OR Z, BUILDIN 179 .8 OSIO HAZ 15' - F­ ... BU, I 19 S K ....... % VE-THRU 4,200 SF �O *A MAX T 25' M 2--1 • E 00.00 14 LF 12"1 PVC 1.4% ... .... .... .... ,STORY'.." A LO 7 4 J" T. 29.5 A BASIN `3 ... .................. 0,100(IN)= 28 ofs j 0 0 I'O(OUT)= 21 cfs 0 V G 5 -f VOLUME DETAINED��"O. f-T ----- IFT= s- Fc,�, WSEL= 93.4 BASIN...B -QTT0M l,�� 9 1w,/ 5<8" WALL_1004 C, 99 OPENING 0, amm-mm- rn 17, CENTER R• 9'L 0 LLJ i 0 SECTION 34 t9N REBAR: 7- ...... 6� 96. B,600SE LI CEPTED:B) 'T -A" 7 COMP `Ak 0 7 _7777 ­12 T *C 2.2% E N Tx L WI RECORP:;� PUBt4S E F- :gD 67 24 x BASIN Q �v, x 95.5 LLJ FENCE LINE IS ..... . IN f z 0100( SRP i 2792.4 a- FAPPROXIMATELY J�) )U I Uj 90,11:FROM CE �R­ FOU U_ �uy BARXWITH T E 1 7 cc L) TA UN ..... LU r ;L.&NE OF �T I �ON C> C U "x 12 C :DA� ....... 4.7 QNX �t T� AD �7 9 Uj U TION FROM ATED POSI R SDr(2413 �T ....... . . ILS'.74 NOK�i SOQm 4 CORNER,: 28 OF S EXIST .SIGNS TO v, w z tAlb 1BE R VED ............... 0 BE RELOCATED S914S T ............ x 12" C; ARETE E .4 7 9 1 (TYP) :PER SD.? C 77 z Aw: 4 CORNER > .... ...... n 793. o CP N89* 56'02"E 2639.66"(0. U0 � ___ ttI'l . . ......... ............ FOUND 01 3 0 - > 011 N890 24'IOT---- < ]SECTION LINE j/-4---'C'ORNER 34 TO SEC 34) CL zt /z/ 1979 55" 2792.5 2 MIT AN-OIERINE ROAD M4/ 3 U.1 ....... D 2BRASS CAP' SURV CENTERLINE 'OF., TANIRINE ROAD DLLU, N :MARKINGS, A (P U rujvrN f I- L) �< T, t FOUND 20 D NAIL S 45* W (DOCKET 12432 PAGE 5414) ..... -------- ................ co MO ME N�k I TH L/ JN & LATED Uj , �C , ERSECTION CALCU V) WHI .7.42" SOUTH OF X V X 2793.7 > U Uj CORNER U.1 0 SEC ON INE 2793.4 0 U_ ...... ........... ------- Ay...... ...... ......... -- - - - ---------- + 279,1.8 ........... ........... ...... ......... ............... ........... ............ ..... .... ... ........ ................................... 2790.6 ............... ........... ........ ........ ..... . -in I Y y y Y Y y Y Y ­MH* ... 3 8 9 &AL-, a Wrl " - b ........... .......... PE PN G 003-064 M . . . . . . ....... Y rT ...... (IE S �7,5 0 E N��5. 5) (BLQCKdUT) (i LF ... ....... EXW25-3-.ti �P E N G-2003-0,64 x R 0 72 C-2-y-'7-9-0• - 2 7 . ..... 91. C CC" ..... JL- 8 21(t�U2 ERASKEYNOTES f.6 NEW 6TYPE VERTICAL CURB PER SD 209 (TYP) ' 2 .7 SAW CUT AT 1' MINIMUM, REMOVE EXIST CURB AND PAVEMENT AS NECESSARY, TACK, AND JOIN NEW PAVEMENT TO EXIST PAVEMENT CURB ACCESS RAMP PER SD 207 WITH TRUNCATED DOMES PER ADA STANDARDS (TYP) O STANDARD PARKING SPACE, TYP (9X 17' W/3/' .2 6.6 SCALE: 1"= 30' OVERHANG) (9' X 20') PER DETAIL (TYP) O 30 15 0 15 30 COVERED PARKING PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS ....... CONTOUR INTERVAL = I/ BICYCLE PARKING PER DETAIL (TYP) 4DOU�10 BR S , 1 •' a "\ CA URVEY MO MEN TRASH ENCLOSURE W/72#SCREEN WALL AND SELF -CLOSING, SELF -LATCHING GATE PER (TYP) 3 �32 279 .7 x O 12 x 35' PASSENGER DROP OFF/LOADING ZONE (TYP) 2794.3 jV, CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER SD 200 (TYP) 10 PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK (TYP) R1-1 STOP SIGN 2O 3 RETAINING WALL PER ARCHITECTURAL AND X. •STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS (TYP) 5 ......... rc 97. ok�4�c ql SECURITY BARRIER (TYP) V O EXISTING FENCE TO BE REMOVED x : T U P AIM DE S Q41NGE EASEMENT 15 PROPOSED DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE (TYP) ��� 279 .6 7 � 6:8 T PAGE 5Q3; �DOC`T 0 PAGE 505; Q u-n 16 PROPOSED IRRIGATION SERVICE (TYP) t, 0 5 PAGE 459 o o A RA DEED,,': �5 PROPOSED 6-FIRE SERVICE (TYP) 9 6 PG 712 (UO PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT .kNNE :27 .81. RE, T ... ..... 19 SCREENWALL PER LANDSCAPE PLAN 725 AR 2 U 3 LIAL WAR NTY DEE TYPE I CONCRETE SIDEWALK SCUPPERS PER SD 204 DOCK$T 12 x ....... TYPE 2 SIDEWALK SCUPPER PER SD 205 ...... .... . 279 .4 so C�T T L 0 TYPE 4 DOUBLE CATCH BASIN W/2 EF-1 GRATES t G 97. PER SD 309 W/FIRST FLUSH TREATMENT UNIT PER\,,� 2792. 6�-, . . ..... TYPE 4 MODIFIED CATCH BASIN W/3 EF-1 GRATES r-G-,\ ... ........ .. ..... Li4t_, -, - 0 ,Cj I N PER SD 309 W/FIRST FLUSH TREATMENT UNIT PER3 TYPE 4 MODIFIED CATCH BASIN W/4 EF-1 GRATES / G ..... ..... PER SD 309 W/FIRST FLUSH TREATMENT UNIT PER o 90.4 ........ TYPE 4 MODIFIED CATCH BASIN W/5 EF-1 GRATES / G -TJ'7 1 PER SD 309 W/FIRST FLUSH TREATMENT UNIT PEO� TYPE 4 MODIFIED CATCH BASIN W/7 EF-1 GRATES PER SD 309 W/FIRST FLUSH TREATMENT UNIT PER,3 P TION CALCULATED BASED ORD INFORMATIGN-,- DROP INLET PER ADOT SD C-15.75 HING FOUND SECTION LINE ® 124'x 35'LOADING ZONE 135,45' ............ END VERTICAL CURB WITH 3'_ TERMINAL SECTION PER SD 212 ........... OUN0 "BRASS -PAP--. SURVEY 0 2' CURB OPENING NO MARKINGS, AT MONUMENT, 791 4 HE.INTERS ECTION-OF-J*E-eL--, .AND THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGAT6NC 4' CURB OPENING 31 OF SECTION LINE 6' CURB OPENING W/1 TYPE 'B"POST BARRICADE, 3 PER SD 106 ..... . . . ............ 8` CURB OPENING W/1 TYPE 13-POST BARRICADE, rH`� ....1 ""''•••'•.. PER SD 106 x a �g 10"CURB OPENING W/ 1 TYPE "B' POST BARRICADES, tH 278' .6 :0 PER SD 106 14'CURB OPENING W/2 TYPE "13"POST BARRICADES,KH • PER SD 106 \, 3 20' CURB OPENING W/3 TYPE "'B-POST BARRICADES'( H 27 .3 C 5' OC PER SD 106 TYPE 4 MODIFIED CATCH BASIN W/6 EF-1 GRATES rG"� 7 g 9.9 PER SD 309 W/FIRST FLUSH TREATMENT UNIT PERV 2790 2 U �ry C --- -- DIE" ELOPMEF7 R(LAN FOR . ...... Z.��279 1.4 //2741. 5 0 / 17 % 2 85 5 X 2786.3 /"��7 8 6. 3 NCH ...... . .. . ....... X 279 ...... x x 28674 -MILLE10 x 2790.7 2L L . . ......... PATON kCIAL CENTeR& 2 790k BRUCE 2 7 8 3.5 --------- .2783.4 PHASE I - COMM 3945 EAST FORT LOWELL ROAD - SUITE 111 J-3668 / / TUCSON, AZ 85712 R I K 520.795.1000 90 (FAX)520.322.6956 / / _�-�NGINEERIN"_' rickengineering.com ucson Sara ,,-xeg� - Sacramento- Riverside - Orange- San Luis Obispo - Bakersfi6d A PHASE 11 - TECH PARK BEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF 01V12-08-07A SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST GILA & OV9-04-02 SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA. DATE: NOVEMBER 17, 2009 SCALE: 1-= 30' CONTOUR, INTERVAL= 1' SHEET t5 OF \\srv- tuc 1\R1ckStandards\Bent ley-2006\workspace\project s\Cor pS tds-2005- TUC\ip lot \Cor pS t ds-2005 - TUC.pen G.-\3668_Corp\3668dp_05.dgn 20-AUG-2010 10-39 SEE SHEET 7 L w X w� F'm� FTUR. 2817o c2 uj ILOS mar-�Zro 0 w w rn Lu LLJu uj � Y Q `) LLI � w ...........a.zwL)v)o I 1 I L� C FOUND 1/2" REBAR z -' m z w BASIN 5 Q 100(IN)= 8 0100(OUT)= 1 r'� ;fs 1 �9.0 FC�2J �� • 9 1 SCALE: 1"- 30' -OVERHANG) 30 KEYNOTES O �2 �3 ® O NEW 6" TYPE 2 VERTICAL CURB PER SD 209 (TYP) SAW CUT AT 1' MINIMUM, REMOVE EXIST CURB AND PAVEMENT AS NECESSARY, TACK, AND JOIN NEW PAVEMENT TO EXIST PAVEMENT CURB ACCESS RAMP PER SD 207 WITH TRUNCATED DOMES PER ADA STANDARDS (TYP) STANDARD PARKING SPACE, TYP (9' X 17' W/3' PF (9' X 20') PER DETAIL (TYP) COVERED PARKING PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS 30 15 0 15 CONTOUR INTERVAL = 1' W BICYCLE PARKING PER DETAIL (TYP) � 0 TRASH ENCLOSURE W/72"SCREEN WALL AND E L SELF -CLOSING, SELF -LATCHING GATE PER (TYP) 3 3 W ® 12' x 35' PASSENGER DROP OFF/LOADING ZONE (TYP) ... 09 CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER SD 200 (TYP) cV) \ 10 PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK (TYP) b v \ 11 R1-1 STOP SIGN 12 RETAINING WALL PER ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS (TYP) 13 SECURITY BARRIER (TYP) '- FOUND 2" BRASS CAP 14 EXISTING FENCE TO BE REMOVED > SURVEY 15 PROPOSED DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE (TYP) N MONUMENT 4 0 2817.4 16 PROPOSED IRRIGATION SERVICE (TYP) PROPOSED 6" FIRE SERVICE (TYP) 18 PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT 19 SCREENWALL PER LANDSCAPE PLAN ED TYPE 1 CONCRETE SIDEWALK SCUPPERS PER SD 204 PAGE ASE EN 4 59 r 21 TYPE 2 SIDEWALK SCUPPER PER SD 205 712 TYPE 4 DOUBLE CATCH BASIN W/2 EF-1 GRATES G ,4 CE GREE .E PER SD 309 W/FIRST FLUSH TREATMENT UNIT PER 3 P . 72 ' F. SE TYPE 4 MODIFIED CATCH BASIN W/3 EF-1 GRATES PER SD 309 W/FIRST FLUSH TREATMENT UNIT PER uj ® TYPE 4 MODIFIED CATCH BASIN W/4 EF-1 GRATES ,7 PER SD 309 W/FIRST FLUSH TREATMENT UNIT PER 3 ® TYPE 4 MODIFIED CATCH BASIN W/5 EF-1 GRATES G 0 PER SD 309 W/FIRST FLUSH TREATMENT UNIT PE3 LL 0 © TYPE 4 MODIFIED CATCH BASIN W/7 EF-1 GRATES G Q 'w a PER SD 309 W/FIRST FLUSH TREATMENT UNIT PERe rn N � a o © DROP INLET PER ADOT SD C-15.75 . Z N Z°� F- I a ® 12' x 35' LOADING ZONE a w Q•• ~ Y (� a 'o o ® END VERTICAL CURB WITH 3' TERMINAL SECTION PER o SD 212 Z uj rn o E- p 2' CURB OPENING J Z J 31 0 4' CURB OPENING a o -� © 6' CURB OPENING W/ 1 TYPE 'B" POST BARRICADE, H PER SD 106 3 © 8' CURB OPENING W/ 1 TYPE 'B" POST BARRICADE, H 75' PER SD 106 3 2 R W 'j ® 10' CURB OPENING W/ 1 TYPE 'B" POST BARRICADES, H PER SD 106 3 © 14' CURB OPENING W/2 TYPE 'B" POST BARRICADES, H PER SD 106 30 �, C 3�6 20' CURB OPENING W/3 TYPE 'B" POST BARRICADES H 3 EX VM.T 5' OC PER SD 106 © TYPE 4 MODIFIED CATCH BASIN W/6 EF-1 GRATES G �yZ PER SD 309 W/FIRST FLUSH TREATMENT UNIT PER 3 c m a E 0 U v� c a� c c w U_ 0 0 N GENERAL NOTES 1. ZONING DESIGNATION: C-1 (COMMERCIAL CENTER) AND TP (TECHNOLOGICAL PARK) 2. PROPERTY OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM AS LONG AS NECESSARY IN ORDER TO TRANSITION PLANTS OVER TO NATURAL SOURCES. ANY PLANT MATERIALS THAT DIE FOR ANY REASON SHALL BE REPLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 4-213. 3. PROPERTY OWNER SHALL MAINTAIN BUFFERYARD PLANTINGS TO ENSURE UNOBSTRUCTED VISIBILITY TO MOTORISTS. ALL SHRUBS, ACCENTS, AND GROUNDCOVERS SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" IN HEIGHT WITHIN SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLES. TREES IN SVTS WILL BE MAINTAINED TO ENSURE THAT BRANCHES/FOLIAGE IS NOT BELOW A HEIGHT OF 6'. 4. IN THE EVENT OF ABANDONMENT OF THE SITE AFTER GRADING/DISTURBANCE OF NATURAL AREAS, DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RE -VEGETATED WITH A NON -IRRIGATED HYDROSEED MIX PER TOWN OF ORO VALLEY STANDARDS. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY WITH OWNER'S PROJECT MANAGER THAT PLANS ARE CURRENT AND APPROVED. 6. WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ORO VALLEY CODE. WHENEVER SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS CONFLICT ON ANY MATTER, THE OWNER'S PROJECT MANAGER SHALL DETERMINE WHICH SPECIAL CONDITION OR CODE SHALL GOVERN. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH THE ENGINEERING SOILS REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS AS THEY RELATE TO HIS WORK. 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY AND/OR REQUIRED PERMITS AND PAY ALL RELATED FEES AND/OR TAXES REQUIRED TO INSTALL THE WORK ON THE PLANS. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE APPROPRIATELY LICENSED AS REQUIRED BY THE STATE OF ARIZONA. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER'S PROJECT MANAGER IMMEDIATELY OF ANY ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPANCIES IN EXISTING CONDITIONS OR WITH THE PLANS PRIOR TO BEGINNING THE WORK. 11. UNIT PRICES FOR ALL IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE ESTABLISHED AS A PART OF THE CONTRACT WITH THE OWNER'S PROJECT MANAGER PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK, TO ACCOMMODATE ADDITIONS AND/OR DELETIONS OF MATERIAL AND/OR LABOR. 12. DETERMINATION OF "EQUAL" SUBSTITUTIONS SHALL BE MADE ONLY BY THE OWNER'S PROJECT MANAGER. 13. SITE OBSERVATION BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DURING ANY PHASE OF THIS PROJECT DOES NOT RELIEVE THE CONTRACTOR OF HIS/HER PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITY TO PERFORM ALL WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND GOVERNING CODES. 14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FULL MAINTENANCE OF ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS AFTER INITIAL WRITTEN APPROVAL, SEE LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS. 15. EXISTING UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES REPORTED BY OWNERS OR OTHERS AND THOSE SHOWN ON RECORDS EXAMINED, ARE INDICATED ON THE PLAN WITH THEIR APPROXIMATE LOCATION AND EXTENT. UNDERGROUND FACILITIES MAY EXIST WHICH HAVE NOT BEEN REPORTED OR OF RECORD. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO TAKE DUE PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES TO PROTECT THOSE FACILITIES FOUND AT THE SITE. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO NOTIFY THE OWNER(S) OF THESE FACILITIES BEFORE STARTING WORK. CAUTION: BEFORE EXCAVATING, VERIFY THE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. AT LEAST TWO (2) WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REQUEST MARK OUT OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES BY CALLING BLUE STAKE AT 1-800-782-5348. 16. CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. THIS INCLUDES THE SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY. THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND SHALL NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS. THE CONTRACTOR ALSO AGREES TO DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND HIS REPRESENTATIVES HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL AND/OR ALLEGED IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK ON THIS PROJECT. GRADING NOTES 1. THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (AZDA), TUCSON OFFICE, SHALL BE NOTIFIED IN WRITING OF PLANS TO CLEAR, GRADE AND/OR CONDUCT SURFACE DISTURBING ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT AT LEAST 30 DAYS IN ADVANCE OF CLEARING AND GRADING ACTIVITIES. NOTIFICATION SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE ARIZONA NATIVE PLANT LAW, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, CHAPTER 7, AS ADMINISTERED BY THE AZDA. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CAUSE THE PROJECT SITE TO BE BLUE -STAKED PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY EXCAVATION OR TRENCHING WORK, AND SHALL BE FAMILIAR WITH PLANS SHOWING UTILITY LOCATIONS. ENGINEERING PLANS SHALL BE REVIEWED TO IDENTIFY THE LOCATIONS OF KNOWN UNDERGROUND UTILITY AND TELEPHONE LINES. BLUE -STAKING SHALL BE KEPT CURRENT DURING THE COURSE OF THE PROJECT. 3. SURFACE DISTURBANCE WITHIN THE WASH RESTORATION AREA SHALL BE MINIMIZED TO THE GREATEST EXTENT POSSIBLE. DISTURBANCE SHOULD GENERALLY BE LIMITED TO EXCAVATION FOR IRRIGATION INSTALLATION AND FOR PLANTING OPERATIONS. 4. SURFACE AREA PREPARATION: SURFACE AREA TO BE DISTURBED BY IRRIGATION INSTALLATION, PLANTING OPERATIONS, OR TRAIL INSTALLATION SHALL BE RAKED AND THE RAKED SURFACE MATERIALS (I.E., ROCK, WOODY DEBRIS, AND VEGETATIVE MATERIALS) SHALL BE SET ASIDE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE EVENLY DISTRIBUTED OVER THE SURFACE OF THE RESTORATION AREA AFTER ALL EXCAVATION, PLANTING, AND IRRIGATION INSTALLATION IS COMPLETE. ROUGH RAKE THE SURFACE TO BLEND WITH ADJACENT UNDISTURBED SOIL SURFACE. 5. LOCATIONS AND OUTLINES OF WATER HARVESTING BASINS SHALL BE FIELD STAKED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND THEN FIELD -EVALUATED AND APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ANY SURFACE DISTURBANCE. MINOR ADJUSTMENTS IN LAYOUT MAY BE MADE IN ORDER TO BEST CAPTURE BASIN OUTFLOW AND MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO EXISTING VEGETATION. 6. WATER HARVESTING BASIN EXCAVATION: • BASINS SHALL BE DUG, SHAPED AND CONTOURED USING THE SMALLEST EQUIPMENT POSSIBLE, PREFERABLY HAND TOOLS TO AVOID EXCESSIVE SITE COMPACTION. ■ MAXIMUM DEPTH OF ANY BASIN SHALL NOT EXCEED 4" (BELOW EXISTING GRADE). ■ ROCK AND BOULDERS THAT ARE EXCAVATED SHALL BE UTILIZED IN PLANTING AREAS TO ENHANCE STORMWATER CAPTURE. BROKEN CONCRETE AND OTHER INORGANIC DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM SITE. MAINTENANCE NOTES 1. THE PROJECT OWNER, AND/OR HIS SUCCESSORS, AGREE TO PRESERVE AND PROTECT THE MITIGATION FOR THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. FURTHER, SAID PROJECT OWNER, OR HIS SUCCESSORS, AGREE TO ACTIVELY MAINTAIN THE MITIGATED AREA FOR A PERIOD OF NOT LESS THAN FIVE YEARS. MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, THE REGULAR OPERATION OF THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM, THE REPLACEMENT OF DEAD TREES, AND THE REMOVAL OF NON -INDIGENOUS, INVASIVE PLANT SPECIES. 2. PLANTINGS SHALL NOT BE PRUNED EXCEPT IF NECESSARY FOR SAFETY. RESTORATION AREA WILL BE MAINTAINED IN A MANNER THAT PRESERVES ITS NATURAL APPEARANCE AND HABITAT VALUES. MISTLETOE WILL BE LEFT IN TREES. 3. AREAS SHALL NOT BE RAKED OR OTHERWISE CLEARED OF NATURAL DEBRIS EXCEPT AS NECESSARY FOR INVASIVE SPECIES MANAGEMENT, 4. CONTAINER PLANTS WILL BE WEANED OFF IRRIGATION ONCE ESTABLISHED. 5. PLANTING BASINS SHALL BE MONITORED FOR ACCUMULATION OF SEDIMENT AND CLEANED OUT AS NECESSARY. hill ;141 i ;f -I v`l.... . I'm i LAO, mill U111SUD 1 V 1 Dr ASSN' > 1 9`'f l D1�-r 10��)y P� Sp UNS 1 �D 1 V l D r A S S N > 1 9--4 1- J1�-r 1 M 2 y F G 1° UIN] SUfjJ1 V1 Dr 2 1 9-4 l•- �1�-r 11001 r�-,, Sp U>v1SUD 1 1110 ASSN, 2 1 9- l- U11sti 01 V i DL 1 A S S N )19 1�r Inl� o4 IT JNI's)JDJ 1 V 10 J 0l<r J 1J�-_JDy _p� l7f o 7 GPI 44 g _ XL KEY MAP SCALE: 1" = 200' LEGEND PROPERTY LINE 10 YEAR FLOOD LIMITS 100 YEAR FLOOD LIMITS RIPARIAN APRON SCALE: 3"=1 MILE LOCATION MAP A PORTION OF' SECTION 34, T 11 S, R 13 E G & SRM TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA i11,11 114:110 . DESCO - MILLER, LLC. AN ARIZONA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 1795 E. SKYLINE DRIVE #193 TUCSON, ARIZONA 85718 (520) 297-8929 ATTN: MICHAEL SARABIA LANDSCAPE ARC141TECT RICK ENGINEERING CO. 3945 E. FORT LOWELL ROAD, SUITE 111 TUCSON, AZ 85712 CONTACT PERSON: MARK FELLINGER PHONE: 520-795-1000 FAX: 520-322-6956 E-MAIL: mfellinger@dckengineering.com CIVIL ENGINEER RICK ENGINEERING CO. 3945 E. FORT LOWELL ROAD, SUITE 111 TUCSON, AZ 85712 CONTACT PERSON: PAUL IEZZI PHONE: 520-795-1000 FAX: 520-322-6956 E-MAIL: piezzi@rickengineedng.com 1 SHT. # SHEET DESCRIPTION WT-01 1 COVER SHEET WP-01 2 PLANTING LEGEND WP-02 3 PLANTING NOTES AND DETAILS WP-03 4 PLANTING PLAN WP-04 5 PLANTING PLAN WI-01 6 IRRIGATION LEGEND AND NOTES WI-02 7 IRRIGATION PLAN WI-03 8 IRRIGATION PLAN WI-04 9 IRRIGATION PLAN WD-01 10 LANDSCAPE DETAILS PLANNING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR DATE OV12-08-07 OV9-04-02 W 0 a a z 0 �n w w m d z exp. 9-30-10 £ 0 0 ° 5 cV N, v N N ° m cv , N Q tii iii co o u a U- U- w w x } r } co N v in ❑ o o z Y U O 0� J LAJ � z: Z L) < U o N Ln o ON N c' F- < _ QZQ C�'J wo°,�: X ra a p } a�• w m }—, Ln d �_ z e w w ® U w w z z • 2 � � w � w ❑ ❑ 1 � � s • ■ � i i t _uorp\Lanascape\vvasn_uocs_overaii\jtjbb_vv i .awg mottea: vet). 1z, zui u SHEET 1 OF 10 i7i PLANT DENSITY CALCULATIONS GROSS WASH RESTORATION AREA * : 7.7 ACRES AREA OF 10-YEAR FLOODPLAIN: 2.4 ACRES NET WASH RESTORATION AREA ** : 5.3 ACRES * GROSS WASH RESTORATION AREA IS AREA FROM PARKING LOTS/VEHICULAR ACCESS DRIVES TO WESTERN RIPARIAN APRON. ** NET WASH RESTORATION AREA IS GROSS AREA MINUS AREA OF 10-YEAR FLOODPLAIN. (NO NEW PLANTING IS PROPOSED WITHIN 10-YEAR FLOODPLAIN.) PROPOSED TREE QUANTITY: 318 (EXCLUDING EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN IN PLACE) PROPOSED SHRUB QUANTITY: 1070 (EXCLUDING EXISTING SHRUBS TO REMAIN IN PLACE) PROPOSED TREES PER ACRE: 60 PROPOSED SHRUBS PER ACRE: 202 PLANT MATERIAL LEGEND SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME QTY. SIZE H x W (CALIPER) REMARKS COMMON NAME TREES J C. ( ) CERCIDIUM FLORIDUM BLUE PALO VERDE ten\ j CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE CHILOPSIS LINEARIS / DESERT WILLOW • OLNEYA TESOTA IRONWOOD 0 A PROSOPIS VELUTINA VELVET MESQUITE PROSOPIS VELUTINA 1 + 1 VELVET MESQUITE ( 1 EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN NON -IRRIGATED HYDROSEED MIX "A" SPECIES 50 65 10 75 50 65 3 56 15 GAL. 15 GAL 24" BOX 15 GAL. 15 GAL. ACACIA CONSTRICTA, WHITETHORN ACACIA AMBROSIA DELTIODEA, TRIANGLE LEAF BURSAGE ARISTIDA PURPUREA, PURPLE THREE -AWN ATRIPLEX CANESCENS, FOUR -WING SALTBUSH BAHIA ABSINTHIFOLIA, DESRT BAHIA BAILEYA MULTIRADIATA, DESERT MARIGOLD BOTHRIOCHLOA BARBINODIS, CANE BEARDGRASS BUTELOUA CURTIPENDULA, SIDE -OATS GRAMA CHLORIS VIRGATA, FEATHER FINGER GRASS ENCELIA FARINOSA, BRITTLEBUSH HILARIA MUTICA, TOBOSA KALLSTROEMIA GRANDIFLORA, ARIZONA POPPY LARREA DIVARICATA, CREOSOTE LEPTOCHLOA DUBIA, GREEN SPRANGLETOP LUPINUS SPARSIFLORUS, DESERT LUPINE MUHLENBERGIA PORTERI, BUSH MUHLY PENSTEMON PARRYI, DESERT PENSTEMON PLANTAGO INSULARIS, INDIAN WHEAT PROBOSCIDEA PARVIFLORA, DEVIL'S CLAW SIENNA COVESII, DESERT SENNA SPHAERALCEA AMBIGUA, DESERT GLOBE -MALLOW SPOROBOLUS CRYPTANDRUS, SAND DROPSEED NON -IRRIGATED HYDROSEED MIX "B" SPECIES ARISTIDA PURPUREA, PURPLE THREE -AWN BAHIA ABSINTHIFOLIA, DESERT BAHIA BAILEYA MULTIRADIATA, DESERT MARIGOLD BOUTELOUA CURTIPENDULA, SIDE -OATS GRAMA KALLSTROEMIA GRANDIFLORA, ARIZONA POPPY LUPINUS SPARSIFLORUS, DESERT LUPINE PLANTAGO INSULARIS, INDIAN WHEAT SPOROBOLUS CRYPTANDRUS, SAND DROPSEED 6'x2'(.75") 4'x2'(.5") TRANSPLANT (REFER TO NPPP) 7' x 4' (1.25") 3'x2'(.75") 5.5' x 3' (.5") - TRANSPLANT (REFER TO NPPP) PROTECT -IN -PLACE (REFER TO NPPP) PLS RATE LBS./ACRE 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.5 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 TOTAL LBS./ACRE: 29.5 TOTAL TOTAL ACRES: 3.58 AC (156,012 SF) PLS RATE LBS./ACRE 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.0 TOTAL LBS./ACRE: 9.0 TOTAL TOTAL ACRES: 0.64 AC (27,982 SF) HYDROSEED NOTES: 1. SLURRY MIX FOR NATIVE SEED APPLICATION SHALL CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING: SEED =LBS/ACRE PER SEED MIX SOIL CONDITIONER (TRI-C HUMATE) =500 LBS/ACRE MYCORRHIZAE (TRI-C ENDO 120) =60 LBS/ACRE WOOD FIBER =2500 LBS/ACRE 2. SURFACE DISTURBANCE WITHIN THE WASH RESTORATION AREA SHALL BE MINIMIZED TO THE GREATEST EXTENT POSSIBLE. DISTURBANCE SHOULD GENERALLY BE LIMITED TO EXCAVATION FOR IRRIGATION INSTALLATION AND FOR PLANTING OPERATIONS. DO NOT TILL SOIL SURFACE PRIOR TO HYDROSEEDING. DIRECT HYDROSEEDING OF SURFACE IS PREFERRED. 3. THIS SEED MIX WILL NOT BE IRRIGATED. APPLICATION OF SEED MIX SHALL COINCIDE WITH PERIODS OF SEASONAL RAIN (JULY-AUGUST OR NOVEMBER-DECEMBER) IN ORDER TO ENCOURAGE GERMINATION. SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME QTY. SIZE REMARKS COMMON NAME 0 2 Q SHRUBS O ACACIA CONSTRICTA 105 5 GAL. z WHITETHORN ACACIA T Ld / ACACIA CONSTRICTA 2 - TRANSPLANT -� WHITETHORN ACACIA (REFER TO NPPP) ■ ACACIA GREGGII 50 5 GAL. CATCLAW ACACIA ® AMBROSIA DELTOIDEA 20 1 GAL. - --- -- --- - TRIANGLE -LEAF BURSAGE w Q 0 ARTEMISIA LUDOVICIANA 25 1 GAL. 'r WESTERN MUGWORT in 0 CALLIANDRA ERIOPHYLLA 60 1 GAL. Z FAIRY DUSTER �p.NDSCq,o FICAy Fyn, ► CELTIS PALLIDA 85 5 GAL. 36734 �° �11 DESERT HACKBERRY w MARK E. 0 # a o FELLINGER ~ ► CELTIS PALLIDA 3 - TRANSPLANT` 9eSBnea•mm P -' DESERT HACKBERRY (REFER TO NPPP) RiZaNA us CLEMATIS DRUMMONDII 30 1 GAL. v o VIRGIN'S BOWER exp. 9-30-1 CYLINDROPUNTIA FULGIDA 20 - SALVAGE FROM E o r CHAINFRUIT CHOLLA ON -SITE, AS AVAILABLE* ° N N N c N N m N N ECHINOCACTUS SPP. 30 - SALVAGE FROM ° � a w w HEDGEHOG CACTUS ON -SITE, AS AVAILABLE* o n ENCELIA FARINOSA 45 1 GAL. _ y 2 2i BRITTLE BUSH co O HYMENOCLEA SALSOLA 50 1 GAL. oLi BURROBRUSH o z Y O O o U w w 0- 2 a- 0 LYCIUM FREMONTII 40 5 GAL. WOLFBERRY R U O V o 0 MAMMILLARIA SPP. 35 - SALVAGE FROM 0 N o c N N PINCUSHION CACTUS ON -SITE, AS AVAILABLE* ¢ M c N N ¢ Z �n O w0Lr) x MUHLENBERGIA RIGENS 20 1 GAL. C' N vUx v rn DEER GRASS m z OPUNTIA SPP. 30 - SALVAGE FROM w w PRICKLY PEAR CACTUS ON -SITE, AS AVAILABLE* z> 2i o � o PENSTEMON PARRYI 60 1 GAL. w o PARRY'S PENSTEMON z z z • �% 0 PSILOSTROPHE COOPERI 100 1 GAL. w �_ ® o PAPER FLOWER SIMMONDSIA CHINENSIS 40 5 GAL. LL�- Z JOJOBA 0 Q 1 wwFr SPOROLOBUS CRYPTANDRUS 40 1 GAL. L M w e d SAND DROPSEED ® Z u w 4 a z z b VERBENA GOODDINGII 85 1 GAL. w O GOODDING VERBENA w wQ = �- =erg_ CL z :pOa- YUCCA ELATA 30 5 GAL. SOAPTREE YUCCA co z zw =ao �i ZIZYPHUS OBTUSIFOLIA 65 5 GAL. �L_u w GRAY THORN Q Q 0 z g i� O� OOw ( # \ EXISTING SHRUB TO REMAIN 175 PROTECT -IN -PLACE H t- > (REFER TO NPPP) Ld O " 0� co _ �zQ Q k� Q O U) zU06 PLANTING NOTES: uw Q m 0 J_ O 1. THIS PLAN CROSS-REFERENCES THE NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLAN (NPPP) PREPARED FOR MILLER RANCH. NUMBERS SHOWN ADJACENT TO TRANSPLANTS AND EXISTING PLANTS TO REMAIN CORRESPOND TO INVENTORY NUMBERS ON THE NPPP. REFER TO THE NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLAN FOR SPECIES INFORMATION. 2. SPECIMENS DENOTED WITH AN ASTERISK (*) SHALL BE SALVAGED FROM AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE WASH RESTORATION AREA. QUANTITIES MAY BE REDUCED IF SUFFICIENT VIABLE SPECIMENS ARE NOT FOUND ON SITE. 3. IF SEASONAL VARIATIONS IN PLANT MATERIAL AVAILABILITY NECESSITATE SUBSTITUTION OF CONTAINER PLANT OR SEED MIX SPECIES, THE SPECIES DIVERSITY (NUMBER OF SPECIES) PRESENTED wpmol IN THE PLAN MUST BE MAINTAINED. ANY NEW SPECIES MUST BE NATIVE, SITE -APPROPRIATE, AND APPROVED BY THE PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. OVI2-08-07 SCALE : NIA OV9-04-02 SHEET 2 OF 10 _Corp\Landscape\Wash_Docs_overall\3668-W Plotted: Feb. c m a E 0 U v: c 0L c CP c w W Q T- d c Lu a O U w U 0 0 N MATCHLINE 'A' - THIS SHEET RETAINING WALL PER GRADING PLAN, TYP I CAL TANGERINE ROAD ■ x j o WATER HARVESTING AREA. PEDESTRIAN TRAIL, TYP. MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET WP-03 ■■■■■■■■■■ f■■�i■■■■ -ww■ SEEM Lnwz � aw>- a�- u Go WQN wWUP`oM Ln '� W w w U Q Y O Z c D t n M Z `i M Q c/) z W W O LD LD LN Q ~ Lj Z W W > O �-e Q z Lu u O 3 F- v7 C)�-zOMwLU a aCD:2 oor->-OZO NC.Dmor_ —= 15' RIPARIAN `APRON, 100-YEAR FLOOD LIMIT 10-YEAR o FLOOD LIMIT1-1 ' RIV E RIG OF WAY ASE ENT 0 TUC ON GA AND CTRIC OR E ECTRIC RA MISSIO AND STRIB T10N BY DOCKE 4474 PAG 479 OUITCL 1M DE RET NING I/E SEMENT OHE E MT & WEL � A WATERL E ESMT (WAT LIN LOCATION KNOWN ND W L ESMT LI S UNDEF] D), D CKE 10160 GE 2161, COR ECT]ON 0 TCLAIM (SA E ESMTS) DOCKET 10167 i P E 21 & 2N9 C RRECTA AME E MTS) DOfCK]T 10�34 PAGE 2 4 PRI E IGHT WAY SEM T1b TUCS G S A D EL CTRIC EL RIC INFR TRU E BY DOC T 4 28 PAG 623 51 Ilii ij\1 37 i 372 �369 370 -�368^ 37 r � 379 37 I3853 \ r / A 1 t• 7 O C v 7 C Do BASIN 6 D* � c C, �c �n D* 3 cfs • 19 • BASIN 3 2 cfs — n�- i RETAINING WALL PER GRADING PLAN, TYPICAL C SEATING - WD-01 AREA, TYP. 3 A WATER ' Y Wp_,01 HARVESTING AREA. K� U\i g 5' WIDE • r -01 PEDESTRIAN r TRAIL, TYP. ./ o 56 A WATER vVD-01 HARVES r I Q 0 a_ a_ z O cn SCALE: 1" = 30' Of �i 36734 c� w MARK a FELLINGER E. n ~ of gR�2QNAd • exp. 9-30-1 �, a CD u W CV N N N - m N cv c`$ m 0 Lii iLi X 0 0 n u = LL w LL ui L w c � m V) 6 ® LLJ o o a y > (D J y W = a > R C) O I t!y U u o ® 0 O N N L Q o N p N N N N QZp n LV N Ln V `N rn=ci c s w W M F- Ln u. n- Q <C 0 0 o w w U o z a p LLJ z Z W F Lw LL Q �40 C) LL wwR LL Lu Q w Z Z wJ Q a� Q�� =Fa Qm 0U) z0Y OW =r2o F-=� U) LL Cn W O2i�Oz2 00W F- > w W�:0� azQ = Q I� QO< Z 06 W Q wU� m � OV12-08-0�7 SCALE : 1" = 30' OV9-04-02 SHEET 4 OF 10 Corp\Landscape\Wash_Docs_overall\3668_WP.dwg Plotted: Feb.22, 2010 MATCHLINE 'B' - THIS SHEET i■■■■4i■■■■■■-`■■■ONE N�■MEIN ■■■■(ml ■I4,wiii WATER HARVESTING AREA c m a E 0 U m c a� a� c c LU Y U ONE WATER E STN G 15' RIPARIAN APRON i 100-YEAR FLOOD LIMIT 10-YEAR FLOOD LIMIT 5' WIDE PEDESTRIAN TRAIL, TYP. RETAINING WALL PER GRADING PLAN, TYPICAL B U I LID I N G 10 0 1■ VYAT HARVESTI 5' WIDE PEDESTRIAN TRAIL, TYP. BUILDII 13 SEATING B U I L AREA, TYP..* 7 — RETAINING WALL PER GRADING PLAN, TYPICAL go 0 I SCALE: 1" = 30' z 0 w w 36734 _ MARK E. FELLINGER 9nod 0 exp, 9-30- E :2 v O u bi n, m I N N N N t� w m o N W cV ui co a o �3 U J LL W LL W � _ W N bD C C � W cn m o O w > O ° U LU a� J 3 S� 2 = U ¢ N F cn a� o O O 0 N N p T— N T- N o rN QZi^p CN N N N w 0 a) ,n V) K ��oQ 0 W LU M N Q ¢ ¢ Q Q w w O U g g z 0 0 a w o w 2 0 z (D —w z W /: cr�-- ® 6_i co ¢ O 0 W W wEE LL F- M¢ w W Zz CL L� w w J ¢ Q E° ¢ U'i z¢m F-:_ 0co EL(n ��¢ z Ow w Lli = IL ~ O Z 2 O z3: W 00> U) w Er'ZitY 4a 0 cv) = Z Q ¢®U) °zs Ww¢ � J m � rro Ol G:\3668_Corp\Landscape\Wash_Docs_overall\3668_WP.dwg Plotted: Feb.22, MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET WP-02 MATCHLINE 'B' - THIS SHEET OV12-08-07 OV9-04-02 SCALE : 1" = 30' SHEET 5 OF 10 �T%\ .y IRRIGATION NOTES �' 4ATER SOURCE M 1. THE IRRIGATION P.O.C. SHALL BE AT NEW RECLAIMED WATER METER AS SHOWN. VERIFIY LOCATION IN FIELD. 2. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS DESIGNED TO OPERATE AT 50 PSI AT THE POINT OF CONNECTION. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS DESIGNED TO OPERATE WITH ONLY ONE VALVE OPEN AT A TIME. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE WATER PRESSURE IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO PURCHASE OF ANY EQUIPMENT AND PERFORMING ANY INSTALLATIONS, IF THE PRESSURE IS NOT AS STATED ABOVE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE PROCEEDING. PROCUREMENT AND/OR INSTALLATION OF ANY IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT WITHOUT VERIFICATION OF SATISFACTORY WATER PRESSURE SHALL BE AT THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 4. ALL WATER USE FOR LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION AND ENHANCEMENT SHALL CONFORM TO THE ARIZONA GROUNDWATER CODE, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES TITLE 45, CHAPTER 2. r-Gnlr_ ni 1. DRAWINGS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC. THE SCALE OF THE PLANS SOMETIMES MAKES IT NECESSARY TO SHOW IRRIGATION PIPELINES WITHIN BUILDINGS, WALKS OR OTHERWISE OUTSIDE OF PLANTING AREAS. THIS IS ONLY FOR CLARITY OF THE PLANS. ALL IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT SHALL BE INSTALLED IN PLANTER AREAS WHEREVER POSSIBLE. 2. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ON THE PLANS: ALL LATERAL END RUNS ARE TO BE 3/4"; MAINLINE IS TO BE TO BE 1" UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ON PLAN; ALL PIPE SHALL BE DOWNSIZED IN DIRECTION OF FLOW ONLY. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT INSTALL THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS WHEN IT IS OBVIOUS THAT FIELD CONDITIONS SUCH AS OBSTRUCTIONS, GRADING DIFFERENCES OR DIFFERENCES IN SIZE AND SHAPE OF THE PLANTED AREAS MAY NOT HAVE BEEN ACCOMMODATED IN THE ORIGINAL DESIGN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF SUCH CHANGE IN FIELD CONDITIONS. IF NOTIFICATION IS NOT PERFORMED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSTALLATION AND FOR THE NEED OF ANY SUBSEQUENT REVISIONS. 4. ALL PIPE LINES AND CONTROL WIRES CROSSING UNDER PAVING SHALL BE SLEEVED. SLEEVES SHALL BE PVC SCH 40 PIPE WITH BELLED ENDS AND SHALL BE TWO TIMES THE DIAMETER OF THE SLEEVED PIPE OR WIRE BUNDLE (2" MINIMUM). CONTROL WIRE TO BE SLEEVED SEPARATELY FROM PIPE. 5. IN CASE OF POSSIBLE CONTROL WIRE FAILURE OR FUTURE EXPANSION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A MINIMUM OF TWO SPARE CONTROL WIRES FROM THE CONTROLLER TO THE FARTHEST VALVE IN EACH CONTROLLER SERVICE AREA. ADDITIONALLY SPARE WIRE FROM ALL EMPTY STATIONS SHALL BE INSTALLED SIMILARLY. ALL SPARE WIRES SHALL PASS THROUGH ALL VALVE BOXES ALONG THE MAINLINE ROUTE. THESE WIRES SHALL BE A DIFFERENT COLOR FROM OTHER CONTROL WIRES AND BE LABELED AS SPARE AT THE CONTROLLER CABINET, IN THE VALVE BOX OF THE FARTHEST VALVE, AND AT ALL OTHER VALVE BOXES. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITHIN WORK AREA PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REQUEST MARKOUT OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES BY CALLING BLUESTAKE AT 1-800-782-5348. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO REFER TO ALL OTHER IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR THIS PROJECT FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. PrIKITQni c 1. SYSTEMS OF THIS PROJECT ARE CONTROLLED BY SOLID STATE, COMPUTER IRRIGATION CONTROLLERS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURERS' INSTRUCTIONS FOR INSTALLATION AND GROUNDING. 2. CONTROLLER LOCATION IS SHOWN DIAGRAMMATICALLY. FINAL LOCATION TO BE APPROVED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. POWER SHALL BE PROVIDED BY OTHERS (SEE ELECTRICAL AND/OR ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS). THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONNECTION OF POWER TO THE CONTROLLER IN COMPLIANCE TO ALL GOVERNING CODES. EMITTERS 1. INSTALL 3/4" EMITTER TUBING WITH DRIP EMITTERS AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE IRRIGATION TO ALL NEW SHRUBS AND TREES (EXCEPT CACTUS) AS SHOWN ON PLANTING PLAN. 2. LAYOUT EMITTER TUBING PARALLEL TO TOPOGRAPHY WHEREVER POSSIBLE. INSTALL AUTOMATIC FLUSH TYPE END CAP AT ENDS OF ALL 3/4" LINES AND FLUSH THOROUGHLY BEFORE INSTALLING EMITTERS. 3. INSTALL ONE SINGLE OUTLET EMITTER AT EACH SHRUB. MULTI -OUTLET Efv ITTERS MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR INDIVIDUAL EMITTERS. 4. INSTALL ONE MULTI -OUTLET EMITTER (6 PORT) AT EACH TREE LOCATE TWO (2) OF THE OUTLET POINTS AT 12" FROM THE TREE TRUNK AND LOCATE FOUR (4) OUTLET POINTS AT 30" FROM THE TREE TRUNK. SPACE OUTLET POINTS EVENLY AROUND THE TREE. 5. USE SHORT PIECES OF 1/4" DISTRIBUTION TUBING (MAXIMUM LENGTH 8')l TO EXTEND EMITTERS TO EACH ROOTBALL. HOLD IN PLACE WITH STAKES. FINAL EQUIPMENT LOCATION 1. MAJOR IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT IN PLANTER BEDS SHALL BE HIDDEN FROM CASUAL VIEW. 2. THE FINAL LOCATION OF ALL VALVES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. SEE PLANS FOR PARTICULAR INFORMATION ON VALVE PLACEMENT. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE LOCATIONS FOR REVIEW AND ADJUSTMENT BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. NECESSARY RELOCATION OF IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT AS A RESULT OF THE CONTRACTORS FAILURE TO STAKE LOCATION AND RECEIVE APPROVAL SHALL BE AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 0 Q E 0 CD c 0) c W U a C) N SYMBOL DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER / MODEL REMARKS ® NEW 1" RECLAIMED WATER METER SEE WATER PLAN ®c AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER HUNTER ICC-800-SS WITH PED-SS AND PWB BP BACKFLOW PREVENTION ASSEMBLY 2" FEBCO 825Y ® REMOTE CONTROL VALVE ASSEMBLY (1) RAINBIRD 2" PESB SERIES VALVE (1) RAINBIRD RBY100MPTX FILTER, OR EQUAL (1) BALL VALVE, NIBCO OR EQUAL INSTALL IN JUMBO VALVE BOX. COLOR: PURPLE ► IN -LINE PRESSURE REGULATOR RAINBIRD PSI-L30X-075, OR EQ. Q QUICK COUPLER RAINBIRD 33-DNP, OR EQUAL INSTALL IN 10" ROUND VALVE BOX. COLOR: PURPLE ►� BALL VALVE NIBCO, OR EQUAL LINE SIZE, INSTALL IN 10" ROUND VALVE BOX. COLOR: PURPLE - PVC MAINLINE PIPE AS APPROVED PVC SCH 40, PURPLE, SIZE PER PLAN PVC LATERAL LINE PIPE AS APPROVED PVC CLASS 200,PURPLE, SIZE PER PLAN, 1" MINIMUM PVC SLEEVE AS APPROVED PVC SCH 40; TWO TIMES DIA. OF PIPE OR WIRE BUNDLE. (4" MIN.) _ 3/4" POLYETHYLENE LATERAL AS APPROVED EXTEND FROM PRESSURE REGULATORS TO WITHIN 8' OF EACH TREE AND SHRUB. NOT SHOWN SINGLE OUTLET EMITTER RAINBIRD XB-10, OR EQUAL N' T SHOWN MULTI -OUTLET EMITTER RAINBIRD XB-10-6, OR EQUAL INSTALL IN 6" ROUND VALVE BOX, COLOR: PURPLE AUTOMATIC FLUSH CAP API MODEL FCH, OR EQUAL INSTALL IN 6" ROUND VALVE BOX. COLOR: PURPLE �i 36734 ca w MARK E, a FELLINGER, S'9,ed z 0 U) u, e n exp. 9-30-1 W VALVE KEY CNc� STATION NUMBER y cV N A - ` c� -- SIZE VALVE SIZE Q Lij 6i GPM-F--�_._ FLOW (GPM) M o o TREE—^•--�.. `— PLANTING TYPE u w ta il N cz 2E z> W Gq tC J ao o o w > O w a J y W E _ V rL Q J Q Lty N p C - GG r O Q c N N N Qc Z p n LL' .< C\ L4 vUoQ 6i W ?Lf) d 0 0 LL U_ LU uw w � 0 0 OV1 -08-07 OV9-04-02 SCALE : N/A SHEET 6 OF 10 OI G:\3668_Corp\Landscape\Wash_Docs_overall\3668-Wl.dwg Plotted: Feb.22, 2010 a c c� 0- E 0 v rn c CD CD c c W U_ O O N x a c m a 0 U rn c a� W Y U_ 0 0 N O MATCHLINE 'A' - THIS SHEET �■■■■�■■■■■■�r■■■■�■■�■■■��■■■■■�� �■�i�M■�■III■■■ if xl I ! !j �• i f %f ` l ! I / I 1w f ) r � j 2" / r I 15'RIPARIAN APRON (LIMIT OF WORK) � 1 i r / / ( Nil 10 I , ! / o :o IN / 2"10 o i / i / // I•i i 1 I O I t / y MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET WI-03 I yod a. -1 BUILDIN( BU I LDINC 9 ■ ■ M ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ , - ------------- -......... -------- - ----------- - - 1 , Y \ 3/4" 9 B U I L D I I I _ I . C 15' RIPARIAN APRON (LIMIT OF WORK) I I \ 1 � i i I l \ �• 1 i 1 > 3/4' %J�� /�r ♦U C 8 B U I L[ o �------------ w �\ f / Is \ 1 w } IR V ; 1 go C-2 11 1 22� • 1 r-------- - -- ! ` DRIP 1 / 3/4" 1-1 /2" 1„ �`, ( `•1 I Iyo B • I i IWIN■■■■■MM■■■O■M■■■'■■■■■o ■�MrM■M■■i MINE ■■pmNo ■ MATCHLINE 'A' - THIS SHEET SCALE: 1" = 30' OV12-08-07 OV9-04-02 w Q 0 a. Z 0 cn w Q 0 M� W 0 z �p,NDSCgA cn 36734 w MARK E. n a FELLINGER -' of .• 4� exp. 9-30-10 O O U i N N m N N co w IJ �o Q ❑ Q ❑ = 3 ti tL = W W ac W m o >- N b m ❑ ❑ uj w O Y 4 W d v S L = U a Q N � N O O LL N o N N N u ¢�K' n ¢ZiriC N CN N W 0 01 N X �V)�� -_ oQ , W W M F"' Ln W W U w ui 2 z o z t? z w w ❑ a XQo 0 W W EE O �ce)QLU Z) WO (D 0OZz IL �� U) I _�< P�� z 2 U) — _ o a - co c/o/'� W yJ Q zw =ao OW �a oz2 02 z � w U) > W d: x = aZJ Q o< ?�z G °6 w W Q -� w J a)� W1=04 SCALE 1" = 30' SHEET 9 OF 10 j:Njtjf;t5_LorpNLanascape\wasn_uocs_ : i-ea. LL, zui U O ENCLOSURE AND AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER PER IRRIGATION LEGEND O 3/4" POWER CONDUIT: SIZE, TYPE, DEPTH PER LOCAL CODE O3 GROUND WIRE CONDUIT, MIN. 1-1/2". GROUND PER ASIC GUIDELINES O 6" THICK FORMED AND POURED -IN -PLACE CONCRETE BASE O FINISH GRADE ® CONDUIT FOR GCBL WIRING O CONDUIT FOR DECODER WIRES -_K) .� NOTES: 1. SEE INSTRUCTION MANUAL FOR MOUNTING INSTRUCTIONS. 2. ALL WIRING SHALL BE INSTALLED PER LOCAL CODES. 3. 120 VOLT POWER TO BE SUPPLIED BY OWNER. IRRIGATION CONTROLLER NOT TO SCALE O ROOTBALL AMENDED BACKFILL MIX O 6" HIGH BERM/MICRO BASIN �4 FINISH GRADE �5 WIDTH TWICE DIAMETER OF ROOTBALL O PLACE ROOTBALL ON NATURAL GRADE 7� FERTILIZER TABLETS 8O (2) 2" DIA. X 10' LONG, LODGE POLES, PLACE OUTSIDE ROOTBALL Og BLACK PLASTIC CINCH -TIE WITH ONE TWIST NAILED TO STAKES 01 Amirl r.. AN SLApp NOT TO SCALE 1 ROOTBALL 2 CROWN 1" ABOVE FINISH GRADE ll J; 33 O FINISH GRADE L / 2 X ROOTBALL DIAMETER 4" MIN. 5 BACKFILL (SEE SPECS) 6 PLANT TABLETS (SEE SPECS) O7 UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL ()PLANTING BASIN DEPRESSED A MINIMUM OF 4" FROM FINISHED GRADE. 10 WYE STRAINER (LINE SIZE), SEE LEGENI: BRASS NIPPLE, TYPICAL 6 1 CU. FT. CONCRETE THRUST 2� REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW BLOCKS, TYPICAL. WRAP DEVICE WITH 2 BALL VALVES, REFER PIPES W/ 10 MIL. TAPE. TO PLAN FOR TYPE AND SIZE OF SATURATE AND COMPACT EQUIPMENT SUB -GRADE TO 90% PRIOR TO O BRASS UNION POUR. O BRASS ELL (TYPICAL) O FINISH GRADE 80 PVC MALE ADAPTER BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE NOT TO SCALE TFINISH GRADE ZO CLEAN COMPACTED BACKFILL O LATERAL LINES, SEE SPECS. O UNDISTURBED SOIL O CONTROL WIRES, SEE SPECS. PRESSURE MAINLINE, SEE SPECIFICATIONS DIMENSION A B C 1/2" TO 2-1/2" SIZE 18" 12" 4" 3" IN SIZE 24" X 4" 4" AND LARGER 36" 4" TRENCHING O TREE PLANTING O PVC SCH. 80 NIPPLE (CLOSE) 2� VALVE BOX W/ COVER: 24" SIZE (PURPLE) 3� I D TAG 40 WATER PROOF CONNECTION (1 OF 2) O 30-INCH LINEAR LENGTH OF WIRE, COILED 6� FINISH GRADE 7O TOP OF MULCH ® PVC SCH. 40 COUPLING O PVC SCH. 80 NIPPLE (LENGTH AS REQ'D) 10 PVC SCH. 40 ELL c NOT TO SCALE O ROOTBALL �2 AMENDED BACKFILL MIX O PLANTING BASIN DEPRESSED A MINIMUM OF 4" FROM FINISHED GRADE. FINISH GRADE 4 E a WIDTH TWICE DIAMETER OF ROOTBALL ® PLACE ROOTBALL ON NATURAL GRADE O FERTILIZER TABLETS 8� (2) 2" DIA. X 10' LONG, LODGE POLES, PLACE OUTSIDE ROOTBALL 9O BLACK PLASTIC CINCH -TIE WITH ONE TWIST NAILED TO STAKES 10 HARDPAN OR CALICHE SOIL LAYER 11 DRILL 8" DIAMETER CHIMNEY DRAINAGE HOLE TO THE SIDE OF ROOTBALL IF HARDPAN OR CALICHE SOIL LAYER IS ENCOUNTERED. 11 PVC SCH. 80 NIPPLE (2" LENGTH, HIDDEN) AND PVC SCH. 40 ELL 12 PVC SCH. 40 TEE OR ELL 13 BRICK (1 OF 4) 14 3" MIN. DEPTH OF 3/4" WASHED GRAVEL 15 PVC MAINLINE, SIZE PER PLANS 16 DRIP VALVE ASSEMBLY PER LEGEND 17 PVC SCH. 80 UNION FOR SERVICING ASSEMBLY 20 PVC SCH. 40 MALE ADAPTER REMOTE CONTROL VALVE (DRIP) NOT TO SCALE PAVING =111- O SAND BACKFILL COMPACTED TO THE DENSITY OF EXISTING -11 I-1 Q 1� 6" ROUND VALVE BOX (PURPLE) BALL VALVE PER LEGEND O LATERAL LINE (PURPLE) 4� 3" MIN. DEPTH OF 3/4" WASHED GRAVEL FINISH GRADE OF DG. BALL VALVE D NOT TO SCALE i ►=1 i I- soil -q) O LATERAL LINE SEE LEGEND FOR SPECS I- -I CONTROL WIRE _I SEE LEGEND FOR SPECS =111=1 5 O UNDISTURBED SOIL I_I—! I I- _ 6 MAINLINE SLEEVE, I I=1 I I_ SEE LEGEND FOR SPECS DIMENSION- PEDESTRIAN A B C D 2" TO 12" SIZE 30" 24" 12" 4" DIMENSION- VEHICLE A B C D 2" TO 12" SIZE 36" 30" 24" 4" NOTES: 1. ALL SLEEVES TO BE PVC SCH. 40 PIPE. 2. ALL SLEEVES TO BE SIZED TWICE THE DIA. OF THE WORKING PIPE. 3. ALL SLEEVES TO RUN A MIN. OF 12" BEYOND HARDSCAPE EDGES. 4. WRAP #12 GALVANIZED WIRE AROUND EACH END OF SLEEVE (10 WRAPS MIN.) AND EXTEND TO SURFACE AS A LOCATING DEVICE. SLEEVING NOT TO SCALE O QUICK COUPLER VALVE. z O BRASS RISER L.A.R. (SIZE EQUAL TO QCV N INLET). 3� SWING JOINT (2 SCH 80 ST ELLS; 1 SCH 80 =1i1=1I I =1 HI I=1I 1 T X T ELL; 1 SCH 80 NIPPLE). I I -I I I=1 I I- PVC TEE (SST) OR EL (ST) ON PRESS MAIN. _I I I_I !! I I_ T_5 PVC PRESSURE MAIN. (PURPLE) 10 -I_- II 1 © PEA GRAVEL SUMP WITHIN BOX. _ 7 1=11 I=11 I ill -in III =11=11 I-111I. 7O 1/2 x36 SCH 40 GALV STEEL PIPE STAKE 6 AND 2 STAINLESS STEEL TIES. I I i 1=1 -lI I- FLUSH IN TURF; 2" IN IN SHRUB AREA -i I� 5 VALVE BOX. (PURPLE) 12 o BRICK OR CONCRETE SUPPORTS (TYP). lJ 11 UNDISTURBED/COMPACTED SUBGRADE. 12 CONCRETE FOOTING (12"x12"x12"). NOTES: 1. USE TEFLON TAPE ON ALL THREADED CONNECTIONS. 2. SWING JOINT AND SIDE OUTLET OF TEE TO BE SIZED EQUAL TO QCV INLET. 3. SUPPLY AND INSTALL R.W. WARNING TAG AS REQ. QUICK COUPLER C Q 0 1U 6" ROUND VALVE BOX (PURPLE) 2O PRESSURE REGULATOR PER LEGEND 3O LATERAL LINE (PURPLE) ® 3" MIN. DEPTH OF 3/4" WASHED GRAVEL O FINISH GRADE OF DG. PRESSURE REGULATOR 1� 6" ROUND VALVE BOX (PURPLE) 2� MULTI -OUTLET DRIP EMITTER PER LEGEND 3O 3/4" POLYETHYLENE LATERAL 4� 1/4" DISTRIBUTION TUBING O 3" MIN. DEPTH OF 3/4" WASHED GRAVEL © FINISH GRADE MULTI -OUTLET DRIP EMITTER o- o- 1� SINGLE OUTLET DRIP EMITTER PER LEGEND 2� 3/4" POLYETHYLENE LATERAL O 1/4" DISTRIBUTION TUBING ® FINISH GRADE SINGLE OUTLET DRIP EMITTER NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE z 0 w w a 0 m 0 z 36734 MARK E. FELLINGER 6 � 9neds/ } N u a ° exp, 9-30-10 E :2 o 0 o as u N N o; Q) N N m N N h C? m Q i— Q O y 0 u J L1_. LL = cwc CwC Y m o N m 0 z Y Q O `� U s w a J N _ CL 2 U d u © r! z N �Lo o ne� o � V_ o o N N U- c N N �' oN R QZ�ci cV N uj Ln x Ln di w rn�0Q s M }'.'. Lo r 7 w w o U 0 0 0 z w w z z O ° z 3:w co w o Q Oc)O w Ow www w�Q w � <a �Zz = wQ QO a � _�¢ Qm 0(n aa ��Q ) w r- zw w OUL =ao g� Oz:2 NOT TO SCALE O O W 0 w F_ I-- > w wd:� 0 c� � = n-ZJ Q QO(n °6 w Q W � J 1� MULTI -OUTLET DRIP EMITTER co O J 3/4" POLYETHYLENE LATERAL 3� 1/4" DISTRIBUTION TUBING ® DISCHARGE POINT, TO BE 1" ABOVE FINISH GRADE TREE TRUNK EMITTER PLACEMENT a� TREES NOT TO SCALE OV12-08-07 OV9-04-02 WD=01 SCALE NTS SHEET 10 OF 10 NOT TO SCALE G:\3668_Corp\Landscape\Wash_Docs_overall\3668_WP.dwg Plotted: Feb.22, NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE 1745 EAST RIVER ROAD - SUITE 101 TUCSON, AZ 85718 520.795.1000 (FAX)520.322.6956 ENGINEERING COMPANY rickengineering.com Tucson Phoenix - San Diego - Sacramento - Riverside - Orange - San Luis Obispo - Bakersfield PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SITE RESOURCE INVENTORY KEY MAP SCALE: 1" = 150' SCALE: 1" = 150' �r SCALE: 3"=1 MILE LOCATION MAP SECTION 34, T 11 S,R13E G&SRM PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA PROJECT DIRECTORY: OWNER/DEVELOPER DESCO GROUP SOUTHWEST 1795 E. SKYLINE DRIVE #193 TUCSON, ARIZONA 85718 (520) 297-8929 ATTN: MR. MIKE BARTLETT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RICK ENGINEFRING CO. 1745 E. RIVER. 1ROAv, SUITE 101 TUCSON, AZ 85718 CONTACT PERSON:IA,RK FELLINGER PHONE: 520- '�5-1000 FAX: 520-322-6956 E-MAIL: mfellirlger@dckengineering.com CIVIL ENGINEER RICK ENGINEERING CO. 1745 E. RIVER ROAD, SUITE 101 TUCSON, AZ 85718 CONTACT PERSON: PAUL IEZZI PHONE: 520-795-1000 FAX: 520-322-6956 E-MAIL: piezzi@rickengineering.com SHEET INDEX SHT. # SHEET DESCRIPTION: 1 COVER SHEET 2 SITE RESOURCE INVENTORY 3 SITE RESOURCE INVENTORY 4 SITE RESOURCE INVENTORY 5 SITE RESOURCE INVENTORY 6 SITE RESOURCE INVENTORY SITE RESOURCE INVENTORY MILILdER, RANCE BEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST GILA & SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA. G:\3668_Corp\Landscape\SRI\3668_sri01.dwg Plotted: May. 16, 2008 c cc E O U cm c a� aD c c w U_ co O a CV r 8- {�� .",+H, }. Yvlau Sr Wik 1,44 a.: ,. i" . ... e , .: ;. . ..... , SCALE. 1 3 a— r1k 4 r. „ + ; M - , SUNKI$T RID. , , it,ry , 1 SIGNIFICANT VEGETATION (1,812 SF) I HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT AREA (15-25% SLOPES) HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT AREA (25%+ SLOPES) / 100-YR. FLOOD LIMITS RIPARIAN AREA / (NOTE: RIPARIAN AREA IS COINCIDENTAL TO THE -- 100 YEAR FLOOD LIMITS) ROCK OUTCROPS NOTE: NONE EXIST ON SITE ( ) SITE RESOURCE INVENTORY WE NO 11��l q MIN-11 041 � w i I BEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST GILA & SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA. SHEET 2 OF 6 0 G:\3668_Corp\Landscape\SRI\3668_sri02.dwg Plotted: May. 16, 2008 c Q E 0 U 0 c 0 Q Q c w U_ it 00 0 N 1745 EAST RIVER ROAD - SUITE 101 . TUCSON, AZ 85718 520.795.1000 (FAX)520.322.6956 ENGINEERING COMPANY rickengineering.com Tucson Phoenix - San Diego - Sacramento - Riverside - Orange - San Luis Obispo - Bakersfield PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION MATCHLI NE - SHEET 4 SCALE: 1" = 30' LEGEND SIGNIFICANT VEGETATION (1,812 SF) HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT AREA (15-25% SLOPES) MHILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT AREA (25%+ SLOPES) 100-YR. FLOOD LIMITS SITE RESOURCE INVENTORY MILLER RANCH BEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST GILA & SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA. SHEET 3 OF 6 C G:\3668_Corp\Landscape\SRI\3668_sriO3.dwg Plotted: May. 16, 2008 c a 0 U .0 aD aD c w U_ OC co O O N tb Ak A r e: 41 ..,010 v SCALE: 1" = 30' LEGEND SIGNIFICANT VEGETATION (1,812 SF) HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT AREA (15-25% SLOPES) LSIDE DEVELOPMENT AREA (25%+ SLOPES, ��i♦i�i�i�i�i�i� 100-YR. FLOOD LIMITS s~ SITE RESOURCE INVENTORY MILLIRR RANCH , .. ' ..., ... . _ � � L,,:<.t, <.� ,.>� ..,� _v., R,< <. _.. �L � �� m.. _ �. � �, 1745 EAST RIVER ROAD - SUITE 101 ..,„ a .. .. .. k .. .. MATCH LI N E - SHEET 5 BEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST DARTER Q OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST TUCSON, AZ 85718 520.795.1000 GILA & SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA. (FAX)520.322.6956 ENGINEERING COMPANY rickengineering.com Tucson Phoenix - San Diego - Sacramento - Riverside - Orange - San Luis Obispo - Bake-sfield PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET 4 OF 6 1 G:\3668_Corp\Landscape\SRI\3668_sriO4.dwg Plotted: May, 16, 2008 e ca 0 e .c a� a� c c w Y U_ of 00 O N , .. .... -. ,.,. , _ .... .. .. ,.: -._, raT..✓ .. cry., ,.,. _c,. . TUCSON, AZ 85718 520.795.1000 (FAX)520.322.6956 ENGINEERING COMPANY rickengineering-cc m Tucson Phoenix - San Diego - Sacramento - Riverside - Orange - San Luis Obispo - Bakersfield PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION VzI SCALE: 1" = 30' LEGEND SIGNIFICANT VEGETATION (1,812 SF) HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT AREA (15-25% SLOPES) ��i�i�i•��i�i�i� 100-YR. FLOOD LIMITS SITE RESOURCE INVENTORY MILLER RANC-1111111 BEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST GILA & SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA. SHEET 5 OF 6 Q G:\3668_Corp\Landscape\SRI\3668_sri05.dwg Plotted: May. 16, 2008 c Q U c c c w ca w 00 0 0 N w,3 MATCHLINE - SHEET 5 d .,w .a. ,. '� .., .,... ... a ..a. s:sa ,x. >... w e. .. w ...x.,. , ... l <. : L ,,. .« ' ,... , , to > , x. ,. «,.- �;. .., x a,.s ..,, m,x >.., „ .:> .> .. . , ...:: .... .<a "< ,.. � [ae ., ,..>. ,.,,.n~r . , .. :_ ,.. ::.a.. .r .., ,_ e ,. .,,, >. .. .. ,. x... zi-. � x ,... -, e.:_... _ i. s.. �`. �. -,m, _4.. > '�i a ..., ..u. , -`"e,.t, t _.c ''�'<- ... ....,. .. <. , w,. .`�>. .�. gym.. .. a. ,. , :� .e .F v .- x ... .. '.e .._ <.,u,: s Wa. > ... . x. VC ... .._. ..�ze '>. �... <,: =7.. ..., .<. k„ ,. ,,.—xc.., :di._ ..r <,.. .. .., ... '. �c..�.�gg ., v�. ,-.v,. .. t., a.. .,. , Y ,., 4«. . :. ..... r,. ,,..:,. ,. i > , ,� ,. .:, .kx. ,t'mu 1?e uT`+e ...\, ,. .i .1.. "�k �.S ..:.. x....�,. �, sR k.. . � ...,< , + ,. :apt � � � .,,�° < _ . x ;. _ .. ,. .?. .. ... .v. „ ae.. ...,, u. ... ,. lr,. ...,.. e.: .:. a. .d!IV,., g a 1 a, , „ .. ,t 1745 EAST RIVER ROAD - SUITE 101 TUCSON, A7 85718 520.795.1000 (FAX)520.322.6956 ENGINEERING COMPANY rickenginee ring. "om Tucson Phoenix - San Diego - Sacramento - Riverside - Orange - San Luis Obispo - Bakersfield PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SCALE: 1" = 30' LEGEND SIGNIFICANT VEGETATION (1,812 SF) HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT AREA (15-25% SLOPES) HILL IDE DEVELOPMENT AREA (25%+ SLOPES) / 100-YR. FLOOD LIMITS SITE RESOURCE INVENTORY MILLER RANCE BEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST GILA & SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA. SHEET 6 OF 6 r1 G:\3668_Corp\Landscape\SRI\3668®sri06.dwg Plotted: May. 16, 2008 i r GENERAL NOTES GROSS AREA (COMMERCIAL CENTER): A J GROSS AREA (PHASE 1 - TECH PARK): 2. TOTAL AREA TO BE GRADED (COMMERCIAL CENTER): TOTAL AREA TO BE GRADED (PHASE 1 - TECH PARK): 256,557 SF (5.9 AC) 299,726 SF (6.9 AC) 220,405 SF (5.1 AC) 268,180 SF (6.2 AC) 3. TOTAL AREA OPEN SPACE REQUIRED: Cl - 45,956 SF TP PHASE 1 - 70,963 SF 4. TOTAL AREA OPEN SPACE PROVIDED: Cl - 51,823 SF TP PHASE 1 - 84,040 SF 5. ZONING DESIGNATION: C-1 (COMMERCIAL CENTER) AND TP (TECHNOLOGICAL PARK) 6. PLAZA SPACE REQUIRED (COMMERCIAL CENTER): PLAZA SPACE PROVIDED (COMMERCIAL CENTER): PLAZA SPACE REQUIRED (PHASE 1 - TECH PARK): PLAZA SPACE PROVIDED (PHASE 1 - TECH PARK): 7. REQUIRED BUILDING SETBACKS: • SOUTH -25' • WEST - 25' • NORTH - 25' • EAST - 25' 4,596 SF 4,990 SF 5,677 SF 11,284 SF 8. REFER TO THE BUFFERYARD TABLE ON THIS SHEET FOR BUFFERYARD TYPES AND WIDTHS. 9. PROPERTY OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM AS LONG AS NECESSARY IN ORDER TO TRANSITION PLANTS OVER TO NATURAL SOURCES. ANY PLANT MATERIALS THAT DIE FOR ANY REASON SHALL BE REPLACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 4-213. 10. MATERIALS WITHIN THE SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE SHALL BE PLACED SO AS NOT TO INTERFERE WITH A VISIBILITY PLANE DESCRIBED BY TWO HORIZONTAL LINES LOCATED 30 INCHES AND 72 INCHES ABOVE FINISHED GRADE OF THE ROADWAY SURFACE. PROPERTY OWNER SHALL MAINTAIN BUFFERYARD PLANTINGS TO ENSURE UNOBSTRUCTED VISIBILITY TO MOTORISTS. ALL SHRUBS, ACCENTS, AND GROUNDCOVERS SHALL NOT EXCEED 2' IN HEIGHT WITHIN SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLES. TREES IN SVTS WILL BE MAINTAINED TO ENSURE THAT BRANCHES/FOLIAGE IS NOT BELOW A HEIGHT OF 6. 11. IN THE EVENT OF ABANDONMENT OF THE SITE AFTER GRADING/DISTURBANCE OF NATURAL AREAS, DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RE -VEGETATED WITH A NON -IRRIGATED HYDROSEED MIX PER TOWN OF ORO VALLEY STANDARDS. 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY WITH OWNER'S PROJECT MANAGER THAT PLANS ARE CURRENT AND APPROVED. 13. WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ORO VALLEY CODE. WHENEVER SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS CONFLICT ON ANY MATTER, THE OWNER'S PROJECT MANAGER SHALL DETERMINE WHICH SPECIAL CONDITION OR CODE SHALL GOVERN. 14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH THE ENGINEERING SOILS REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS AS THEY RELATE TO HIS WORK. 15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY AND/OR REQUIRED PERMITS AND PAY ALL RELATED FEES AND/OR TAXES REQUIRED TO INSTALL THE WORK ON THE PLANS. 16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE APPROPRIATELY LICENSED AS REQUIRED BY THE STATE OF ARIZONA. 17. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER'S PROJECT MANAGER IMMEDIATELY OF ANY ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPANCIES IN EXISTING CONDITIONS OR WITH THE PLANS PRIOR TO BEGINNING THE WORK. 18. UNIT PRICES FOR ALL IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE ESTABLISHED AS A PART OF THE CONTRACT WITH THE OWNER'S PROJECT MANAGER PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK, TO ACCOMMODATE ADDITIONS AND/OR DELETIONS OF MATERIAL AND/OR LABOR. 19. DETERMINATION OF "EQUAL" SUBSTITUTIONS SHALL BE MADE ONLY BY THE OWNER'S PROJECT MANAGER. 20. SITE OBSERVATION BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DURING ANY PHASE OF THIS PROJECT DOES NOT RELIEVE THE CONTRACTOR OF HIS/HER PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITY TO PERFORM ALL WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND GOVERNING CODES. 21. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FULL MAINTENANCE OF ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS AFTER INITIAL WRITTEN APPROVAL, 22. EXISTING UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES REPORTED BY OWNERS OR OTHERS AND THOSE SHOWN ON RECORDS EXAMINED, ARE INDICATED ON THE PLAN WITH THEIR APPROXIMATE LOCATION AND EXTENT. UNDERGROUND FACILITIES MAY EXIST WHICH HAVE NOT BEEN REPORTED OR OF RECORD. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO TAKE DUE PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES TO PROTECT THOSE FACILITIES FOUND AT THE SITE. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO NOTIFY THE OWNER(S) OF THESE FACILITIES BEFORE STARTING WORK. CAUTION: BEFORE EXCAVATING, VERIFY THE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. AT LEAST TWO (2) WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REQUEST MARK OUT OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES BY CALLING BLUE STAKE AT 1-800-782-5348. 23. CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. THIS INCLUDES THE SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY. THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND SHALL NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS. THE CONTRACTOR ALSO AGREES TO DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND HIS REPRESENTATIVES HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL AND/OR ALLEGED IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK ON THIS PROJECT. 24. SUBSEQUENT LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR REMAINING PHASES MUST BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD. • 1 1 JNSJED,J 1 V 1 D ASSIN] , 2 1 4_J- 0KT 10 5 p9 sm A S S JN > J 9-4 1 O_J 2 y Pr SIR U1\1SU01 V I D ASSI 1 � 1 —4 7- DKT 1 1001 y PG SIR Ui\1;Sj-U Drj J V 1 F� 2 1 9 -4—J- DKT 1 16 @3 y P G) UNSUJJ 1 V 10 E: ASSI 13 > 1 9 - .f l - JK-r 3 352y Pr U1\1SUEJ'D J V J DE r�SSJJ 2 19 Eiji <-r 11o10y P SCALE. 1" = 200' LANDSCAPE BUFFERYARD TABLE - COMMERCIAL CENTER PROPERTY LINE 10 YEAR FLOOD LIMITS 100 YEAR FLOOD LIMITS r 1 WASH RESTORATION AREA / RIPARIAN APRON BUFFER BUFFER TYPE BUFFER WIDTH BUFFER LENGTH TREES REQ'D. TREES PROVIDED SHRUBS REQ'D. SHRUBS PROVIDED ACCENTS REQ'D. ACCENTS PROVIDED COMMENTS NORTH — — — — — — — — — NO BUFFER REQUIRED SOUTH B 30' 425' 22 22 22 25 44 48 EAST B 30' 557' 28 28 28 39 56 56 WEST — — — — — — — — — BUFFER PROVIDED BY WASH LANDSCAPE BUFFERYARD TABLE - PHASE 1 - TECH PARK BUFFER BUFFER TYPE BUFFER WIDTH BUFFER LENGTH TREES REQ'D. TREES PROVIDED SHRUBS REQ'D. SHRUBS PROVIDED ACCENTS REQ'D. ACCENTS PROVIDED COMMENTS NORTH — — — — — — — — — NO BUFFER REQUIRED SOUTH — — — — — — — — — NO BUFFER REQUIRED EAST B 30' 674' 34 36 34 34 68 85 WEST — — — — — — — — — BUFFER PROVIDED BY WASH SCALE: 3"=1 MILE THIS PROJECT LOCATION MAP A PORTION OF SECTION 34, T 11 S, R 13 E G & SRM TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA PROJECT DIRECTORY: DESCO - MILLER, LLC. AN ARIZONA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 1795 E. SKYLINE DRIVE #193 TUCSON, ARIZONA 85718 (520) 297-8929 ATTN: MICHAEL SARABIA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RICK ENGINEERING CO. 3945 E. FORT LOWELL ROAD, SUITE 111 TUCSON, AZ 85712 CONTACT PERSON: MARK FELLINGER PHONE: 520-795-1000 FAX: 520-322-6956 E-MAIL: mfellinger@rickengineering.com CIVIL ENGINEER RICK ENGINEERING CO. 3945 E. FORT LOWELL ROAD, SUITE 111 TUCSON, AZ 85712 CONTACT PERSON: PAUL IEZZI PHONE: 520-795-1000 FAX: 520-322-6956 E-MAIL: piezzi@rickengineering.com SHT. # SHEET DESCRIPTION LT-01 1 COVER SHEET LP-01 2 PLANTING LEGEND LP-02 3 PLANTING PLAN LP-03 4 PLANTING PLAN LP-04 5 PLANTING PLAN LI-01 6 IRRIGATION LEGEND AND NOTES LI-02 7 IRRIGATION PLAN LI-03 8 IRRIGATION PLAN LI-04 9 IRRIGATION PLAN LD-01 10 LANDSCAPE DETAILS SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLES DESIGN SPEED (MPH) NEAR SIDE SIDE FAR SIDE SIDE 15 PAAL'S (MAJOR) 10' X 100' 10' X 70' 15 PAAL'S (MINOR 10' X 30' 10' X 30' 40 480' 370' 45 600' 470' PLANNING AND ZONING DATE ADMINISTRATOR OV12-08-07 OV9-04-02 77 A �4 z 0 Ln w w Q m 0 z RI ICA 36734 MARK E. FELLINGER ed. exp. 9-30-1 0 0 E -0 r o u N N N a ) N INco _ N N co - m v U- w w w o m ®w Q z > Y a w w J _ T U ¢ o - i U u L*? 0 0 O N p N C N N Q Z r7 n cV N Ln Woa,Ln Ln < uw ui 0 s 0 0 w w o U � � � z a z z z ® o U ?� w w c� a Y XQ® Qwww 0 Qw w w ozz ¢ a. � w=o a:�- ¢ w ¢ TZ � 0 CL EL EL O®z z 06 ter¢ w ¢ � 9w w 7CL® �_It U ®z� U o J v 00w P:►— > z I� W w 0 co azQ °g ¢ O < U W W ¢ m LT=01 SCALE 1" = 200' SHEET 1 OF 10 scape\ConstDocs_Ph 1 PLANT MATERIAL LEGEND SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME QTY. SIZE H x W (CALIPER) REMARKS COMMON NAME TREES ACACIA SALICINA WILLOW ACACIA ACACIA WILLARDIANA PALO BLANCO CHILOPSIS LINEARIS DESERT WILLOW �U\ CERCIDIUM X DESERT MUSEUM \nC' DESERT MUSEUM PALO VERDE CERCIDIUM FLORIDUM BLUE PALO VERDE CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE PROSOPIS VELUTINA • VELVET MESQUITE 19 15 GAL. 6' x 2' (.75") 11 15 GAL. 6' x 2'( .75 ") 27 15 GAL. 6' x 2' (.75 ") 59 24" BOX. 7.5' x 4' (1.5") 3 43 15 GAL. 4' x 2' (.5 ") 2 36" BOX 8' x 6' (2") 2 48" BOX 10' x 8' (3.5") 40 24" BOX 7' x 4' (1") TRANSPLANT SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME QTY. SIZE REMARKS COMMON NAME SHRUBS (•) ACACIA CONSTRICTA �� WHITETHORN ACACIA CAESALPINIA PULCHERRIMA RED BIRD OF PARADISE CALLIANDRA ERIOPHYLLA FAIRY DUSTER DODONAEA VISCOSA HOPSEED BUSH 3 ENCELIA FARINOSA BRITTLE BUSH Q LEUCOPHYLLUM GREEN CLOUD GREENCLOUD TEXAS RANGER O LEUCOPHYLLUM LAEVIGATUM CHIHUAHUAN RAIN SAGE SIMMONDSIA CHINENSIS JOJOBA 9 5 GAL. 17 5 GAL. 96 5 GAL. 29 5 GAS. 45 5 GAL. 121 5 GAL. 86 5 GAL, 30 5 GAL. NOTE: THAT ARE INDICATED ON THE PHASE I NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLAN ARE INCLUDED ON THE WASH RESTORATION PLAN PREPARED BY CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS AND FINISH SCHEDULE_ CONCRETE PAVERS: TO BE DETERMINED POTS: SHALL BE "QUICKCRETE MODEL QRCE2422P". COLOR AND FINISH TO BE DETERMINED LOCATE PER PLANS (15 TOTAL). SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME QTY. SIZE REMARKS COMMON NAME ACCENTS - AGAVE VILMORINIANA 24 5 GAL. OCTOPUS AGAVE AGAVE BRACTEOSA 53 5 GAL. SQUID AGAVE ® CALYLOPHUS HARTWEGII 129 1 GAL. CALYLOPHUS CARNEGIA GIGANTEA 7 - SAGUARO DALEA GREGGII 11 5 GAL. TRAILING INDIGO BUSH DASYILIRION WHEELERI 126 5 GAL. DESERT SPOON ■ FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII 15 5 GAL. BARREL CACTUS FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII 12 - BARRELCACTUS HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA 133 5 GAL. RED YUCCA O LANTANA MONTEVIDENSIS 261 1 GAL. TRAILING LANTANA © LANATANA'GOLD MOUND' 86 1 GAL. GOLD MOUND LANTANA MUHLENBERGIA'AUTUMN GLOW' 42 5 GAL. AUTUMN GLOW DEER GRASS o PENSTEMON PARRYI 54 1 GAL. PARRY'S PENSTEMON O SALVIA GREGGI 119 5 GAL. AUTUMN SAGE VERBENA GOODINIGII 204 1 GAL. GOODING VERBENA NON -IRRIGATED HYDROSEED MIX SPECIES IN POT, SEE FIN. SCHEID PLS RATE LBS./ACRE ACACIA CONSTRICTA, WHITETHORN ACACIA 2.0 AMBROSIA DELTIODEA, TRIANGLE LEAF BURSAGE .4.0 ARISTIDA PURPUREA, PURPLE THREE -AWN 2.0 BAILEYA MULTIRADIATA, DESERT MARIGOLD 2.0 BUTELOUA CURTIPENDULA, SIDE -OATS GRAMA 2.0 CASSIA COVESII, DESERT SENNA 2.0 ENCELIA FARINOSA, BRITTLEBUSH 1.5 ERICAMERIA LARICIFOLIA, TURPENTINE BUSH 1.0 LARREA DIVARICATA, CREOSOTE 5.0 PENSTEMON PARRYI, DESERT PENSTEMON 2.0 PLANTAGO INSULARIS, INDIAN WHEAT 3.0 SPHAERALCEA AMBIGUA, DESERT GLOBE -MALLOW 1.0 SPOROBOLUS CRYPTANDRUS, SAND DROPSEED 10 29.5 TOTAL NOTES: SLURRY MIX FOR NATIVE SEED APPLICATION SHALL CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING: SEED =LBS/ACRE PER SEED MIX SOIL CONDITIONER (TRI-C HUMATE) =500 LBS/ACRE MYCORRHIZAE (TRI-C ENDO 120) =60 LBS/ACRE WOOD FIBER =2500 LBS/ACRE AREA TO BE SEEDED SHALL BE THOROUGHLY TILLED PRIOR TO APPLICATION OF SLURRY MIX. TILLING OPERATIONS SHALL BE PERFORMED SO AS NOT TO DISTURB ADJACENT AREAS OF NATIVE VEGETATION. THIS SEED MIX WILL NOT BE IRRIGATED. APPLICATION OF SEED MIX SHALL COINCIDE WITH PERIODS OF SEASONAL RAIN (JULY-AUGUST OR NOVEMBER-DECEMBER) IN ORDER TO ENCOURAGE GERMINATION. SITE STABILIZATION ALL AREAS OF THE SITE GRADED OR DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION, EXCEPT BASIN BOTTOMS; THAT ARE NOI STABILIZED WITH DECOMPOSED GRANITE/DECORATIVE ROCK SHALL BE HYDROSEEDED. INORGANIC GROUNDCOVER A MIN. 2" DEPTH LAYER OF DECOMPOSED GRANITE/DECORATIVE ROCK SHALL BE: PLACED IN ALL ... PLANTING AREAS. SIZE SHALL BE 1" SCREENED ON SLOPES GREATER THAN 4:1 AND 5/8" SCREENED IN ALL OTHER AREAS. COLOR SHALL BE 'DESERT GOLD' AVAILABLE THROUGH KALAMAZOO MATERIALS (520-575-9601). In I I �p,NuSCq,o Cv� ,��FICgTF �y� 36734 w MARK E. o FELLINGER o � ' 9 m S'sned• ` P. R�2ONA exp. 9-30-1 Q ® d T_ J N W tl \ tl Y N N c� N 00 co Li di D n Li- LL w w ;E 2 w m w ot w > 0 o w J >_ ' O Ln o ® 0 �C tt ONcN N N Li Q N h Q Z p n ACV ci "1 0 a, Ln n x Ln cn r. -- "c �u < v w w M t_.. Ln t 0. Q w w �z w r w CK Y w Q wWw oTz Qw O w W 0 Z z ® D w W 2 Q 0Y < :D0M CL Ovs� z Ld r w a.w �_cr w z wU)w Oz2E U OQw ® U F=�9 Z Q Lj a- Z ®U) 0 C3 wuj< rt a G:\3668_Corp\Landscape\ConstDocs_Ph1\3668_ph1_LP.dwg Plotted: Feb.22, OV12-08-07 OV9-04--02 SCALE /A SHEET 2 OF 10 SCALE: 1" = 30' z 0 I 36734 MARK E. FELLINGER 14'9ned"- UNA exp. 9-30-10 C) c) E N N c� c� 00 co y nS V. 6i Q6i 0 0 LL w Li- LLJ OU LU 0 D I? 0 < t .�t LU �e > 0 0 c� C) 0 LLI LLJ E 3: 2 u o �Ll N as L=O C) 0 CNocy N N N V) 2: 0 0 V) C'4 (7) V) N NLLJ Lr) Ln U O 0 Li 6i < N) Ln LL _.c CL. I— LL LL w w 0 0 QQ LLJ z W m1w, LL < 0 z U) 0 W <• N w W 1...< < 0 LLJ (r) LL W5 — z w U) o 0� < < -0 LU M IL 0 IL 0 (n z ob U) w < uj LiA z Lu LL Cf) LIJ 0 z 2 CL < C-) z w 0 0 L-Li C) w z• < o LU a- < • U) 0 (D 06 c) Q K w w < U) m m —Corp\Landscape\ConstDoc,s--Ph 1 \3668_ph 1 _LP.dwg Feb. 22, OVI 2-08-07 OV9-04-02 SCALE -. 1 " = 30' SHEET 3 OF 10 E 0 U CD CD c 0) c LU C) CN ro) MATCHUNE - SHEET LP-04 v 1 O-YEAR - FLOOD LIMIT 100-YEAR FLOOD LIMIT 15'RIPARIAN APRON �� ` WASH RESTORATION — AREA. SEE SEPARATE WASH RESTORATION PLAN 6/ T E WGH T OV1WAY E SEMENT — -T(YTU(zsOiq GAS-#D ELECTRC 'J} FOR ELE rml R NSMISS19 AN T R I B 1�4"'NBYE D OC ET 4 4,-T'4 PAGE 4 9 . ..... JQ PRI TE RIGHT ,QF WAY 'aSEM�N Tp TUCS G 'EL LU T-CTRIC "FOR EL R IC� INFRA F R *D A4 T R E--�--' 1BY DW T 4228 PA 623 OU TCLAIDEREAINING E EAMENT/, OHE ESMT & E IL IL I AND Y/ATE NE E T (WATERL NE L TION UNKN N AND WELL ESMT NES DEFIN�M, C �E T, 1t)AL6 PAG 2161, CORR N QUI �" CLAIM / (S EWTS) V CKET,,/10167 AGE- 21 -4-' ND CORRECT )N-, MTS) DOCKE� 10Z 1-411, \PA4 200A MATCHLINE - SHEET LP-02 j /oo j RETAINING WALL PER GRADING PLAN ER BARRICADE RAILING PER CIVIL PLAN /ol , 110 C,q n 0 la all 0* • ........... BUILD I NG 5 •COLORED CONCRETE 0. ..o ......... PAVING, TYPICAL. COLOR TO BE DETERMINED. BENCH, TYPICAL �---/PLAZA AREA (2,548 SF) TRASH RECEPTACLE TYPICAL 0 0 W* ID cl cl S J W, PHASE I (OFFICE)/ v COMMENCOAL v L II z m PLAZA AREA 1 (2,303 SF) all uj a_ a. z LVA SCALE: 1 3(l" I I I I I I I L>U Ko z 36734 7 %\\ MARK E• 0 FELLINGER 30��NDSCAPE BUFF`� 111311 exp. 9-30- 10 A 0 0 E k N 00 a C? < 0 0 LL LL w w 75 w > OC co C13 cl 0 w w > < 0 0 a �9 w E z :) 0 Lo c Lr OLI N A C:) 7- ,,, < o Lan' s") Lr) CA N it qj w Lli rn Lr) LL- 7 LL LL ui Lli 2E 2 0 Un LU z Z LD U) w cr- LL < mod® LLJ LJJ w < cf) < CL 0� T- T < ou (L-3 (:31 (zq z w U 0 6A.1 < 3: w U) 0:D < 0 U) U) (f) I- z < 00 v- < CL J-L 0- w 1-- u- j U) LU LLJ z 0 z 2 0- Lli < z � w C) < 0 0 >uj �n4 0 � z o wIL Z -J 2E < 0 < 0 06 z 0 Lu < OV12-08-07 SCALE : lit = 30' OV9-04-02 SHEET 4 OF 10 G:\3668-_Corp\Landscape\ConstDocs—Ph1\3668_ph1_LP.dwg Plotted: Feb. 22, 2010 42" MASONRY SCREENWALL SCALE- I" =3U 36734 MARK E. FELLINGER d vk exp. 9-30-10 C) 0 E 7 T- N 04 c� c® 00 (o C? U- LL LU LU Z> 2 LUro Li LLJ > 0 Lij CL 11 E Qcn < Ln Ln IS, CD CD 00 o -� U O0 rq C, j V) 7 C14 CN Lu 0 Lr) a) Le) Lr) V) U c a) di bi " < m Lo LL LL 0 w w 0 D LU z z z w LL < ow 0 < LLI W w I L c') < 0 m 0 < w D 5 LL Li a w (f) 0 w < () < IL W < < X D 0 0 U) od LLJ < < w Lu T a- �-- .1 LLI EL F— z LLI LL (1) LLJ 0 z :�F w —1 < 0 0 LU > 2.) 0� 0 c) LLI a- z < 0 < C-6 E Lu < (f) it FD oul G:\3668_Corp\Landscape\ConstDocs—Ph1\3668_ph1_LP.dwg Plotted: Feb. 22, 2010 OV12-08-07 OV9-04-02 SCALE 30' SHEET 5 OF 10 IRRIGATION NOTES WATER SOURCE 1. THE IRRIGATION POINTS OF CONNECTION SHALL BE AFTER NEW 1" WATERS METER. SEE WATER PLANS. 2. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS DESIGNED TO OPERATE AT 50 PSI AT THE POINT OF CONNECTION„ THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS DESIGNED TO OPERATE WITH ONLY ONE VALVE OPEN AT A TIME. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE WATER PRESSURE IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO PURCHASE OF ANY EQUIPMENT AND PERFORMING ANY INSTALLATIONS, IF THE PRESSURE IS NOT AS STATED ABOVE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE PROCEEDING. PROCUREMENT AND/OR INSTALLATION OF ANY IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT WITHOUT VERIFICATION OF SATISFACTORY WATER PRESSURE SHALL BE AT THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 4. ALL WATER USE FOR LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION AND ENHANCEMENT SHALL CONFORM TO THE ARIZONA GROUNDWATER CODE, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES TITLE 45, CHAPTER 2. ri►n 1. DRAWINGS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC. THE SCALE OF THE PLANS SOMETIMES MAKES IT NECESSARY TO SHOW IRRIGATION PIPELINES WITHIN BUILDINGS, WALKS OR OTHERWISE OUTSIDE OF PLANTING AREAS. THIS IS ONLY FOR CLARITY OF THE PLANS. ALL IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT SHALL BE INSTALLED IN PLANTER AREAS WHEREVER POSSIBLE. 2. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ON THE PLANS: ALL LATERAL END RUNS ARE TO BE 3/4"; MAINLINE IS TO BE TO BE 1" UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ON PLAN; ALL PIPE SHALL BE DOWNSIZED IN DIRECTION OF FLOW ONLY. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT INSTALL THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS WHEN IT IS OBVIOUS THAT FIELD CONDITIONS SUCH AS OBSTRUCTIONS, GRADING DIFFERENCES OR DIFFERENCES IN SIZE AND SHAPE OF THE PLANTED AREAS MAY NOT HAVE BEEN ACCOMMODATED IN THE ORIGINAL DESIGN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF SUCH CHANGE IN FIELD CONDITIONS, IF NOTIFICATION IS NOT PERFORMED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSTALLATION AND FOR THE NEED OF ANY SUBSEQUENT REVISIONS. 4. ALL PIPE LINES AND CONTROL WIRES CROSSING UNDER PAVING SHALL BE SLEEVED. SLEEVES SHALL BE PVC SCH 40 PIPE WITH BELLED ENDS AND SHALL BE TWO TIMES THE DIAMETER OF THE SLEEVED PIPE OR WIRE BUNDLE (2" MINIMUM). CONTROL WIRE TO BE SLEEVED SEPARATELY FROM PIPE. SYMBOL DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER / MODEL REMARKS ® NEW 1" WATER METER SEE WATER PLAN ®A AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER HUNTER ICC-1600-SS WITH PED-SS AND PWB BP BACKFLOW PREVENTION ASSEMBLY 1" FEBCO 825Y ® REMOTE CONTROL VALVE ASSEMBLY (1) RAINBIRD V PEB SERIES VALVE (1) RAINBIRD RBY100MPTX FILTER, OR EQUAL (1) BALL VALVE, NIBCO OR EQUAL ► IN -LINE PRESSURE REGULATOR RAINBIRD PSI-L34X-075, OR EQ. ►/ BALL VALVE NIBCO, OR EQUAL LINE SIZE ®e �� 1-1/4" PVC MAINLINE PIPE AS APPROVED PVC SCH 40 1" PVC LATERAL LINE PIPE AS APPROVED PVC CLASS 200 PVC SLEEVE AS APPROVED PVC SCH 40; TWO TIMES DIA. OF PIPE OR WIRE BUNDLE. (4" MIN.) 3/4" POLYETHYLENE LATERAL AS APPROVED EXTEND FROM PRESSURE REGULATORS TO WITHIN 8' OF EACH TREE -------------- AND SHRUB. NOT SHOWN SINGLE OUTLET EMITTER RAINBIRD XB-10, OR EQUAL NOT SHOWN MULTI -OUTLET EMITTER RAINBIRD XB-10-6, OR EQUAL --� AUTOMATIC FLUSH CAP API MODEL FCH, OR EQUAL INSTALL IN 6" ROUND VALVE BOX NDSC _ 36734 • ' MARK E. o FELLINGER . o� ti exp. 9-30-10 5. IN CASE OF POSSIBLE CONTROL WIRE FAILURE OR FUTURE EXPANSION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A MINIMUM OF TWO SPARE CONTROL WIRES FROM THE CONTROLLER TO THE FARTHEST VALVE IN EACH CONTROLLER SERVICE AREA. ADDITIONALLY a SPARE WIRE FROM ALL EMPTY STATIONS SHALL BE INSTALLED SIMILARLY. ALL SPARE WIRES SHALL PASS THROUGH ALL VALVE Y c� BOXES ALONG THE MAINLINE ROUTE. THESE WIRES SHALL BE A DIFFERENT COLOR FROM OTHER CONTROL WIRES AND BE LABELEDLij ou m N AS SPARE AT THE CONTROLLER CABINET, IN THE VALVE BOX OF THE FARTHEST VALVE, AND AT ALL OTHER VALVE BOXES. I? VALVE KEY 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITHIN WORK AREA PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. .� s AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REQUEST MARKOUT OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES STATION NUMBER ` BY CALLING BLUESTAKE AT 1-800-782-5348. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO REFER TO ALL OTHER IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR THIS A - SIZE VALVE SIZE - PROJECT FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. GPM FLOW (GPM) Lm TREE—� �— PLANTING TYPE o, CONTROLS 0 w w E 1. SYSTEMS OF THIS PROJECT ARE CONTROLLED BY SOLID STATE, COMPUTER IRRIGATION CONTROLLERS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL U _ EXERCISE STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURERS' INSTRUCTIONS FOR INSTALLATION AND GROUNDING. `n o N o urr N 2. CONTROLLER LOCATION IS SHOWN DIAGRAMMATICALLY. FINAL LOCATION TO BE APPROVED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. Z m POWER SHALL BE PROVIDED BY OTHERS (SEE ELECTRICAL AND/OR ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS). THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE Q o `' a Lr) n x r_ RESPONSIBLE FOR CONNECTION OF POWER TO THE CONTROLLER IN COMPLIANCE TO ALL GOVERNING CODES. U o Q o me 6i }-- Ln m Ln c. Q EMITTERS U w 1. INSTALL 3/4" EMITTER TUBING WITH DRIP EMITTERS AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE IRRIGATION TO ALL NEW SHRUBS AND TREES (EXCEPT CACTUS) AS SHOWN ON PLANTING PLAN. w z 2. LAYOUT EMITTER TUBING PARALLEL TO TOPOGRAPHY WHEREVER POSSIBLE. INSTALL AUTOMATIC FLUSH TYPE END CAP AT ENDS OF ALL 3/4" LINES AND FLUSH THOROUGHLY BEFORE INSTALLING EMITTERS. W '- w w 3. INSTALL ONE SINGLE OUTLET EMITTER AT EACH SHRUB. MULTI -OUTLET EMITTERS MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR INDIVIDUAL EMITTERS. XQN 4. INSTALL ONE MULTI -OUTLET EMITTER (6 PORT) AT EACH TREE. LOCATE TWO (2) OF THE OUTLET POINTS AT 12" FROM THE TREE `, °C w uj E TRUNK AND LOCATE FOUR (4) OUTLET POINTS AT 30" FROM THE TREE TRUNK. SPACE OUTLET POINTS EVENLY AROUND THE �' `Y' T TREE. ® w uj 5. USE SHORT PIECES OF 1/4" DISTRIBUTION TUBING (MAXIMUM LENGTH 8') TO EXTEND EMITTERS TO EACH ROOTBALL. HOLD IN ui Q o PLACE WITH STAKES. w w 2 u- Q M � 2E 0 U) FINAL EQUIPMENT LOCATION z � w `® w ry_ 1. MAJOR IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT IN PLANTER BEDS SHALL BE HIDDEN FROM CASUAL VIEW. a: U- X w UJ �z2 2. THE FINAL LOCATION OF ALL VALVES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. O 04 SEE PLANS FOR PARTICULAR INFORMATION ON VALVE PLACEMENT. Q E� U > 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE LOCATIONS FOR REVIEW AND ADJUSTMENT BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO w :2 a. Z Q INSTALLATION. NECESSARY RELOCATION OF IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT AS A RESULT OF THE CONTRACTORS FAILURE TO STAKE O ® U) O LOCATION AND RECEIVE APPROVAL SHALL BE AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. uiW< 0 1 ME I. cv N CN d 0 P N N cV W Q OI G:\3668_Corp\Landscape\ConstDocs_Ph1\3668_ph1_Ll.dwg Plotted: Feb.22, W,IN Il i !� !� SCALE : N/A SHEET 6 OF 10 OF CONNECTION TER NEW 1" R METER. SCALE: V = 30' z 0 36734 MARK E. FELLINGER �Alqned, exp. 9-30-10 C) 0 Tl_ Ir- N cV N N N N 00 CO J O 6i 6i co CC < 0 0 0 LL LL w LU 00 UJ 72 0 Lli t LLJ > < 0 0 (r- w [L E U < o C) C) O C14 N NC LL < C) N N N N< Lu O cy) Lr) r-,� u 0 x < rn Ln 0 Lo LL U_ LLJ LLJ 0 0 w z Lij LL < I-- Z U) 0 < W < N W LLJ w < 0 :D LL LLJ z U) 0 w U a_ _ T_ 0- Z) 0 0- 0 U) U) < 0� a- Q Ld z LL (1) W it LD 0 w I-_ > z < U ix: 0 co LL) IL Z < 0 < 0 06 w LLJ < m ED- _(,'orp\Landscape\ConstDocs__Ph 1 N3668_phl _Ll.dwg Platted: y TANGERINE ROAD q SCALE o 1 30' SHEET 7 OF 10 a c m a E 0 U c _c v 0 c c ui 0-1 U_ O ea Q t'V 0 O ENCLOSURE AND AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER PER IRRIGATION LEGEND O2 3/4" POWER CONDUIT: SIZE, TYPE, DEPTH PER LOCAL CODE O3 GROUND WIRE CONDUIT, MIN. 1-1/2". GROUND PER ASIC GUIDELINES O 6" THICK FORMED AND POURED -IN -PLACE CONCRETE BASE O FINISH GRADE © CONDUIT FOR GCBL WIRING O CONDUIT FOR DECODER WIRES NOTES: 1. SEE INSTRUCTION MANUAL FOR MOUNTING INSTRUCTIONS. 2. ALL WIRING SHALL BE INSTALLED PER LOCAL CODES. 3. 120 VOLT POWER TO BE SUPPLIED BY OWNER. 1 RRIGATION CONTROLLER ,A 12" NOT TO SCALE O 2' MAX. O I �n--fTc 10 WYE STRAINER (LINE SIZE), SEE LEGENO5 BRASS NIPPLE, TYPICAL g 1 CU. FT. CONCRETE THRUST 20 REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW BLOCKS, TYPICAL, WRAP DEVICE WITH 2 BALL VALVES, REFER PIPES W/ 10 MIL. TAPE. TO PLAN FOR TYPE AND SIZE OF SATURATE AND COMPACT EQUIPMENT SUB -GRADE TO 90% PRIOR TO @3 BRASS UNION POUR. O BRASS ELL (TYPICAL) O FINISH GRADE 80 PVC MALE ADAPTER o BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE IDENTIFICATION GUIDE 12" 12" 12" DW RW A COMM COMMUNICATION SPLICES O JUMBO REC I ANGULAR VAVLE DW RW A GR GROUNDING RODS BOX 20" X 14" DW RW A STA # REMOTE CONTROL VALVES (DSTANDARD RECTANGULAR DW RW A MV MASTER VALVES VAVLE BOX 16" X 11" DW RW A FS FLOW SENSORS DW RW A GV GATE VALVES 3 ROUND VALVE BOX 10" DIA. DW RW A FI FERTILIZER INJECTORS 4 EDGE OF AREA (CURB, WALK, DW RW A BS BASKET STRAINERS OR WALL) DW RW A MS MOISTURE SENSORS DW RW A SB SPLICE BOX DW RW A QC QUICK COUPLERS SAMPLE: ow DW RW A FS FLOW SENSORS POTABLE WATER 'A 12 DW RW A FVA FLUSH VALVE ASSEMBLY SYSTEM OF CONTROLLER "A" CONTACT IRRIGATION CONSULTANT FOR INFO REMOTE CONTROL ON ANY DEVICE IN A BOX NOT LISTED. VALVE ON STATION 12 NOTES: 1. VALVE BOXES SHALL BE LABELED BY HOT IRON BRANDING OR ALLUMINIUM ASPHALTIC BASE WATER -PROOF PAINT. 2. CONTROL VALVES SHALL BE INSTALLED TO ALLOW ORDERLY ARRANGEMENT OF VALVE BOXES. 3. LOCATE VALVE ASSEMBLIES IN SHRUB OR GROUND COVER AREAS WHEN POSSIBLE. 4. LOCATION OF VALVE ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE STAKED FOR APPROVAL BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 5. CENTER VALVE BOXES OVER VALVE ASSEMBLE TO FACILITATE ACCESS AND MAINTENANCE. 6. SET VALVE BOXES AT EQUAL ELEVATIONS WITH TOPS AT FINISH GRADE IN TURF AREAS OR 2" ABOVE FINISH GRADE IN SHRUB/ GROUND COVER AREAS. 7. VALVE BOXES SHALL BE SET PARALLEL TO EACH OTHER AND PERPENDICULAR TO EDGE OF AREA. 8. DO NOT DEFOREM OR COLLAPSE VALVE BOX BY EXESSIVE SOIL COMPACTION AROUND BOX, 9. SEE ALSO INDIVIDUAL VALVE INSTALLATION DETAILS. F VALVE PLACEMENT XiAQiC:c ccG 4451 O SHRUB PLANTING NOT TO SCALE 10 ROOTBALL O CROWN 1" ABOVE FINISH GRADE O FINISH GRADE O FINISH GRADE AT SLOPE �5 2 X ROOTBALL DIAMETER �6 BACKFILL (SEE SPECS) �7 PLANT TABLETS (SEE SPECS) �g SEE SPECIFICATIONS O TOP OF PAVING 10 4" WATERING BASIN (IF REQ'D) 0� 11 UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE O FINISH GRADE 20 CLEAN COMPACTED BACKFILL O3 LATERAL LINES, SEE SPECS. O UNDISTURBED SOIL O CONTROL WIRES, SEE SPECS. O PRESSURE MAINLINE, SEE SPECIFICATIONS DIMENSION A B C 1/2" TO 2-1/2" SIZE 18" 12" 4" 3" IN SIZE 24" 4" 4" AND LARGER 36" 4" TRENCHING 10 PVC SCH. 80 NIPPLE (CLOSE) O VALVE BOX W/ COVER: 24" SIZE O I D TAG O WATER PROOF CONNECTION (1 OF 2) O 30-INCH LINEAR LENGTH OF WIRE, COILED O FINISH GRADE 70 TOP OF MULCH 80 PVC SCH. 40 COUPLING 90 PVC SCH. 80 NIPPLE (LENGTH AS REQ'D) 10 PVC SCH. 40 ELL e IN O z Fn > w U 10 6" ROUND VALVE BOX O 6" ROUND VALVE BOX 11 PVC SCH. 80 NIPPLE (2" LENGTH, 20 BALL VALVE PER LEGEND 20 PRESSURE REGULATOR PER LEGEND HIDDEN) AND PVC SCH. 40 ELL O LATERAL LINE O LATERAL LINE 12 PVC SCH. 40 TEE OR ELL ® 3" MIN. DEPTH OF 3/4" WASHED GRAVEL ® 3" MIN. DEPTH OF 3/4" WASHED GRAVEL 13 BRICK (1 OF 4) O FINISH GRADE OF DG. O FINISH GRADE OF DG. 14 3" MIN. DEPTH OF 3/4" WASHED GRAVEL uLj 15 PVC MAINLINE, SIZE PER PLANS BALL VALVE PRESSURE REGULATOR Q 16 DRIP VALVE ASSEMBLY PER LEGEND D NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE O 17 PVC SCH. 80 UNION FOR SERVICING m ASSEMBLY — 0 20 PVC SCH. 40 MALE ADAPTER Z REMOTE CONTROL VALVE DRIP cNOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE • s • NOT TO SCALE �� 10 PAVING -ilj O SAND BACKFILL COMPACTED -III-I TO THE DENSITY OF LXISTING SOIL -1 I OI �0111_- 3 O LATERAL LINE -111-1 II -III: SEE LEGEND FOR SPECS =III --I O CONTROL WIRE SEE LEGEND FOR SPECS I I -I 11. UNDISTURBED SOIL MAINLINE SLEEVE, O SEE LEGEND FOR SPECS DIMENSION- PEDESTRIAN A B C D 2" TO 12" SIZE 30" 24" 12" 4" DIMENSION- VEHICLE A B C D 2" TO 12" SIZE 36" 30" 24" 4" NOTES: 1. ALL SLEEVES TO BE PVC SCH. 40 PIPE. 2. ALL SLEEVES TO BE SIZED TWICE THE DIA. OF THE WORKING PIPE. 3. ALL SLEEVES TO RUN A MIN. OF 12" BEYOND HARDSCAPE EDGES. 4. WRAP #12 GALVANIZED WIRE AROUND EACH END OF SLEEVE (10 WRAPS MIN.) AND EXTEND TO SURFACE AS A LOCATING DEVICE. SLEEVING ■ ■ % NOT TO SCALE O QUICK COUPLER VALVE. Z r 20 BRASS RISER L.A.R. (SIZE EQUAL TO QCV N ® INLET). O SWING JOINT (2 SCH 80 ST ELLS; 1 SCH 80 T X T ELL; 1 SCH 80 NIPPLE). i-1 I I Q III 4 PVC TEE (SST) OR EL (ST) ON PRESS MAIN. -� O-� 0 O _ �'J 5 PVC PRESSURE MAIN. PEA GRAVEL SUMP WITHIN BOX. �'J i!=III=III -= i01 -11-11!OII I. ? 7O 1/2"x36" SCH 40 GALV STEEL PIPE STAKE -- AND 2 STAINLESS STEEL TIES. FLUSH IN TURF; 2" IN IN SHRUB AREA O '�ID o=1111�III1-� 5 90 VALVE BOX. BRICK OR CONCRETE SUPPORTS (TYP). 11 UNDISTURBED/COMPACTED SUBGRADE. 12 CONCRETE FOOTING (12"x12"x12"). NOTES: 1. USE TEFLON TAPE ON ALL THREADED CONNECTIONS. 2. SWING JOINT AND SIDE OUTLET OF TEE TO BE SIZED EQUAL TO QCV INLET. 3. SUPPLY AND INSTALL R.W. WARNING TAG AS REQ, QUICK COUPLER M NOT TO SCALE O o_ O- _o 0 O 10 6" ROUND VALVE BOX 20 MULTI -OUTLET DRIP EMITTER PER LEGEND O 3/4" POLYETHYLENE LATERAL 40 1/4" DISTRIBUTION TUBING O 3" MIN. DEPTH OF 3/4" WASHED GRAVEL © FINISH GRADE MULTI -OUTLET DRIP EMITTER 10 SINGLE OUTLET DRIP EMITTER PER LEGEND 20 3/4" POLYETHYLENE LATERAL 30 1/4" DISTRIBUTION TUBING ® FINISH GRADE SINGLE OUTLET DRIP EMITTER n R FICg7F `9,A� 20 C�i 36734 MARK E. y FELLINGER 9ned exp. 9-30-10! 00 v N N - m N N 00 c 0 C? N Q ❑ ❑ Y n Iw w � a� w w LIJ t o r m m Lw o o Y > O J W E T_ r� �.J o i I "n p O O ON Q N N N N M QZ�p O v N N n v xcv c MF-ou c Q Q z � w w u- w o a NOT TO SCALE z � o z z z • = w 0 w ❑ ❑ O Q 0Qo Y ww� nQn CL X T o = Q w 0Oz IU Q�® a- w cn w=¢ � �Oci IZ a_ O to Z z 06 �� Q J 2 C � _ a. O z 2 NOT TO SCALE IL U z VJ < Lu O O / ❑ Q c w LLzQ QUU) 0 O�- 06 U w w J 10 MULTI -OUTLET DRIP EMITTER 0° (D 20 3/4" POLYETHYLENE LATERAL O 1/4" DISTRIBUTION TUBING ® DISCHARGE POINT, TO BE 1" ABOVE FINISH GRADE 50 TREE TRUNK O U 1 EMITTER PLACEMENT a� TREES ■ J NOT TO SCALE `..J OV12-08-0,7 SCALE : NTS OV9-04-02 SHEET10 OF '10 m G:\3668 Corp\Landscape\ConstDocs Phl\3668... p Feb. 22, 2010 �? t LLEY TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PLANNING AND ZONING y " 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE, ORO VALLEY AZ 85737 PHONE: (520) 229-4800 FAX: (520) 742-1022 www.orovalleyaz.gov APPLICATION FORM OV Case # (Office Use Only): C) C/ C ,r - 0 7"-9 Application Type: nP-,TPI n1 mpni- plan A. Project Manager/Developer Name: Mike Bartlett Firm: Desco Southwest Address: 17gr, > - Skyline Drivpf Smite 1AS City:_ Tucson State: Ari z.ona Zip: R571 R Telephone (520) 29 7-8929 Fax: (520) 297-894 Email. mharl . .(lad (;rrcrrouz , com B. Property Owner (s), if more than one owner, attach list Name:_SamP; Ag AhnvP Firm: Address: City: State: Zip: Telephone: Fax: Email: C. Subject Property ParcellTaxCode: pr,rtiQns_nf 21Q-47�-lan,-219--7 01- 4 2ic)47L-nncp.A ?1.eQ-47-0050 Legal Description/Property Address: Nwr r A & Ta nrge r i ne A Area of property: 10.53 Acres Existing Zoning: c-1 /TP Proposed Zoning: c-1 /TP Is Proposed Zoning in conformance with General Plan designation? [ ] NIA ] Yes [ ] No General Plan Designation: commPrri a_, ni Ct.ri rt f 'PPrY,nn1 n jsnj Park Existing Land Use: vacant Proposed Land Use: Commercial D. Previous Applications Relating To This Property OV8- OV9- OV10- OV11- OV12- OV13- E. Reason For Request Phase l T)Ayi 1loplip'nt—Plan- CEPneral and mP(jiral offirl-g This application is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. been authorized by the owner to make this application. JUL 3 0 Z000 Date I am the owner of the above described property or have Signature Page 1 of 1 Moran, Debbie From: Ronquillo, David Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 3:44 PM To: Gay, Shirley; Moran, Debbie Subject: miller ranch development Please close out file #OV12-08-07B, this file has been combined with OV12-08-07 & OV12-08-07A. Thanks... David 06/08/2009 JPLLEY qn,�2 0 Eo�9 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PLANNING AND ZONING 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE, ORO VALLEY AZ 85737 PHONE: (520) 229-4800 FAX: (520) 742-1022 www.orovalleyaz.gov APPLICATION FORM OV Case # (Office Use Only): _ "1//J (i l l Application Type:_ Development Plan A. Project Manager/Developer Name: Mike Rar.l Firm: Desco Southwest Address: 1795 East Skyline Drive, Suite 193 City: Tucson State: Arizona Zip: 85718 Telephone: (520) 297-8929 Fax: (520) 297-8943 Email: mha rl Pt.+.�rlPcr-�gZQtl corn r Property Owner (sy, if ippri,ban one owner, attach list I 1 Name: C-...-- Al- ­ Firm: Address: - City: State: Zip: Telephone: Fax: Email: C. Subject Property Parcel/Tax Code: Pnrtions of 219-47-018A and 1-47-017A Legal Description/Property Address:_NgTr T, A r a n g 9 a k T a n gP r, n e R na d Area of property: 7. 3 5 A c- r e Existing Zoning: C-1 /TP Proposed Zoning: C-1 /TP Is Proposed Zoning in conformance with General Plan designation? [ ] NIA t ] Yes [ ] No General Plan Designation: Comm i a 1 Di c;tri r-t,/Terhnol oni ral Par Existing Land Use: vacant Proposed Land Use: Commercial D, Previous Applications Relating To This Property OV8- OV9- OV11 E. Reason For Request OV12- OV10- OV13- This application is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, I am the owner of the above described property or have been authorized by the owner to make this application. 111� r' n 71`108 W� Date Signature NOTICE In addition to the Town of Oro Halley (the "Town'), there may be other jurisdictions affecting development of this property. If a property developer waits until late in the development process to contact other pertinent governmental agencies or bodies, additional expense and time in coordination, redesign and development may be a result. Examples of other governmental agencies and/or bodies that may have overlapping jurisdiction over this property include but are not limited to the following: Federal: 4 The United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service is responsible for Endangered Species Act compliance, etc. Please note, habitat has been designated within the Town. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Field Division j—; 2321 West Royal Palm Road, Suite.103 �� / �7F Phoenix, Arizona 85021-4951 Phone (602) 640-2720 ;i Fax (602) 620-2730 The United States Corps of Engineers: This agency is responsible for management of jurisdictional waters, is etc. Section 404 consultations may be required on properties that contain washes. s 9. , y r r '..fro Viall y U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 5205 E. Comanche Davis Monthan AFB Tucson, AZ 85707 Phone (520) 584-4486 F 520 State• ( ) 584-4497 Arizona Department of Environmental Quality: This agency has multiple responsibilities. Please contact directly for further information. ADEQ 1110 W. Washington Street Phoenix, AZ 85007 County: (602) 771-2300 Prrna County Department of Environmental Quality: This agency has multiple responsibilities. contact directly for further information. Please PDEQ 201 N. Stone Avenue, 2„d Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 740-6520 Please be advised, issuance of a permit DOES NOT, nor should it be construed, to imply compliance with Federal, State or County regulations. If you have any questions concerning your responsibilities under federal law, please contact the applicable agency. APPLICANTNAME: Mike Barlett Desco Southwest CONTACI'PHONEANDADDRESS: 1795 E. skyline Drive, Suite 193 Tucson, AZ SrMLOCATION: NwC LA Canada & Tangerine Road PROPOSED USE: Cornme rc i a i Applicant Signature JUL J U 2(iN Date 85718 Case✓File Number r TM ENGINEERING COMPANY November 17, 2009 Mr. David Ronquillo TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 11000 North La Canada Drive Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 SUBJECT: MILLER RANCH COMMERCIAL CENTER WASH RESTORATION PLAN (OV12-08-07) JN 3668 Dear David, We have reviewed your comment letter dated April 16, 2009, the comment letter from David Laws dated April 14, 2009, and the comment letter from RECON dated March 23, 2009 regarding the Wash Restoration Plan, for the above referenced project. The comments were addressed as shown on the revised plan. Regarding the comments on the Wash Restoration Plan, we offer the following responses: PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION — David Ronquillo The riparian area trail has been relocated per engineering's comments. ENGINEERING —David Laws General Comments: 1. We have addressed all redline comments on the Wash Restoration Plan and that plan is being returned for your review. 2. The 10-year flood limit lines have been revised. 3. The Wash Restoration Plan has been revised such that no new planting is proposed within the 10-year flood limit lines. In addition, the proposed trail alignment has been revised such that it, too, is outside of the 10-year flood limit lines. 4. Proposed storm water outflow rates depicted on the plan have been revised to match the Drainage Report. Sheet WT-01: 5. 10-year flood limit line symbol has been added to the legend. 6. The location map has been revised as requested. 7. General Notes 3 and 15 have been revised as requested. 3945 East Fort Lowell Road, Suite 111 • Tucson, Arizona 85712-1046 • (520) 795-1000 • FAX: (520)322-6956 • rickengineering.com TUCSON PHOENIX SAN DIEGO RIVERSIDE ORANGE SACRAMENTO SAN LUIS OBISPO BAKERSFIELD Mr. David Ronquillo August 17, 2009 Page 2 of 2 Sheet WP-02 (Please note that sheet has been revised to WP-03): 8. Recording information for easements has been revised to match that depicted on the Development Plan. ghPPt wn_0a- 9. The 100-year flow rates associated with all detention basins and storm drains that outlet into the restoration area are included on the revised plan. Water harvesting basins are proposed at basins 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and at the northernmost storm drain outlet. Please refer to sheets WP-03 and WP-04. RECON — Lori Jones Woods and Carianne Funicelli 1. Maintenance Note 1 on Sheet WT-01 has been revised to include code -required language. 2. Symbols and callouts for existing plant specimens to remain in place have been revised for clarity. 3. A plant substitution note has been added to Sheet WP-01 as Note 3. 4. Please note that a raised path was considered, but is not proposed in order to limit the amount of grading/disturbance within the restoration area. Sincerely, RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. �G II Mark Fellinger, AS AL LEED AP Landscape Architect NO:cw H:\3668 - Miller Ranch\T0V-WASH-Resp-Itr2.doc A CLASS III CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY OF 37.2 ACRES AT TANGERINE ROAD AND LA CANADA DRIVE ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS FILE NUMBER PENDING Prepared by: A. Stanley Granger Reviewed arid submitted by: Mark Chenault, Pli.D. WestLand Resources, Inc. Engheering and EnvlronmentalConsullonts 4001 East Paradise malls Drive Tucson, Arizona 85712 (520) 206-9585 Cultural Resources Report2008-17 April 10, 2008, Project No. 1544.01 520 520 cy — TABLL, OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT............................................................................................................................................................................... ii PROJECTBACKGROUND......................................................................................................................................................... l ENVIRONNIL'NIAL SEr11NG.......................................................................................................................................................t CUI.TURAI. HISTORY OF SOUTI IERN ARI7.ONA........................................................................................................................ 5 Paleoindian (ca. 11,500-40,500 H.1):/9500-8500 B.c:.).......................................................................................... 5 Archaic (ca.850011.C: j1.D:1)...I........................................................... ............................................... ................... 6 EarlyArchaic (ca. 8500-6000 B.C.)............................................................................................................... 6 kyfiddleArchaic (ca. 6000-1500 B.C.)............................................................................................................... 7 Late Archaic (ca. 1500 B.C,--A,D. 1)........ :... :............. :................. :........ :................ :............................................. 7 FormativePeriod (A.D. 1--1450).............................................................................................................................11 Early VQnnative Period (A.1). 1 700): The Irate Archaic Legacy...........................................1...................12 Middle Formative Period (A.D. 700-1150): Hohokam Ascension and Descension:..............................15 Late Formative (A.D. 1150-1450): A New Direction of Change...............................................................19 Prot6listoric.Period (A.1). 1450-1691)..................... .,............................. ,..................................................... 22 Historic Period (A.D. 1691-1950) ....................................................................................................................25 ME-11IODS........................................................................................................................................................................26 RESULTS................................................................................................................................................................................ 27 Site. Files Search.........................................................................................................................................................27 FieldSurvey.................................................... .... ............................................... ...... ..... ............ ..................................30 CONCLUSIONS ANU RECONIM ENDAT IONS ............................................................................................................................ 30 RE•FEItLNCI:S......................................................................................................................................................................... 31 FIGURES Figure 1. Vicinity snap ................................................................................................................................................. 2 Figure2. Project location map ............................. ...... ............. ...................................... ............... i........................ 3 Figure 3. Previously recorded project within the APE and previously recorded sites within 1.6 km (1 mi) of the APE.............................................................. ........................................... ...... ........ 29 TABLES Table 1. Previously recorded projects withui 1.6 lun.(1 tram) of the area of potential effect ..........................27 Table 2. Previously recorded sites within 1.6 km .(1 mi) of the area of potettial effect ................: PHOTOGRAPHS Photo 1. Overview of area of potential effect looking southeast.........................................................................1 Photo 2. Overview of area of potential effect looking south................................................................................ 4 Survey of37.2Acres at Tangot-Inc Road and La Ca/fadn Drlve, Oro Valley, ArP-,one Westland Resources, Inc. tNVWdgandFMrodM 1ca%C*M1 ,Ai3STRACT DATE: April 10, 2008 REPORT TITLE: A Class III Cultural Resources Survey of 37.2 Acres at Tangerine Road end La Canada Drive, Oro Valley, Arizona PROJECT TITLE: Miller Ranch Develop)nettt Survey PROJECT NUMBER: '1544.01 520 520 PROJECT SPONSOR: Miller Ranch—DESCO, LLC LAND OWNERSHIP: Private LEAD AGENCY: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (file number pending) LOCATION: 'Township 11'South, Range 13 East, .a portion of Section 34, Piina County, Arizona, Gila and Salt River Baseline and Meridian USGS 7X QUAD: Oro Valley NUMBER OF ACRES: 37.2 WESTIAND PERMIT NUMBER: Arizona Antiquities Act Blanket Permit No. 2008-032b1 nELD,PERSON DAYS: 1 NUMBER OF PREVIOUSLY RECORDED SITES: None NUMBER OF NEWLY RECORDED SITS: None NUMBER OF ISOLATED OCCURRENCES: None REGISTER,ELIGIBLE PROPERTIES: None REGISTER•INELIGIBLE PROPERTIES: None PROJECT DESCRIPTION: On January 24, 20D8, kVestLand Resources, Inc., conducted a cultural resources survey of 37.2 acres of private land at Tangerine Road and La Canada Drive, Oro Valley, Arizona, to satisfy Class III clearance requirements for a proposed development. SUMMARY: No new sites were recorded during the survey; therefore, %VestLagd Resources, Inc., recoqurietnds archaeological clearance for the property. However, if any buried archaeological materials are encountered during constriction work, all activity should halt until•a qualified.archaeologist has assessed the.significance of those discoveries. Survey of37.2Acres at 7'angctbic Road and La Callada Drive, O.ro VaRcy, Arizona WestLand Resources, Ine. &pteaiipond tm9arreHaca�ne«.9 J A CLASS III CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY OF 37.2 ACRES AT TANGERINE ROAD AND LA CAIVADA DRIVE PROJECT BACKGROUND Miller Ranch — DESCO, IJ.C, is pursuing plans to develop a .37.2-ac property at the intersection of Tangerine Road and La Canada Drive, Oro Valley, Pima County, Arizona, The property may contain waterways that fall under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps .of Engineers (Corps) and is currently under Corps review. If jiui.sdictional waters are present, Miller Ranch — DESCO, LLC, will need to comply with the Clean Water Act of 1972 (as amended) and obtain permits through the .Corps under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. West - Land Resources, Inc, (WestLand), was contracted to assist in obtaining the required permits. To meet its mandated responsibilities, the Corps must comply with Section 106 of die National Istoric Preserva- tion Act of 1966 (as amended) and take into w ORO VALLEY., ARIZONA hYA. Strwley Ghlger account the effect an undertaking will have on cultural resources included in (or eligible for inclusion in) the National Register o£ Historic Places (N1tHP). Miller Ranch — DESCO, LLC, has initiated and is pursuing Section 106 consultation as outlined in the uupletnnenting federal regulations (36 CFR 800). The area of potential effect (APE) for the proposed undertaking is located in Township 11 South, Range 13 East, a portion of Scction 3a, Gila and Salt River 13ascliuc and Meridian; Puria County, Arizona (Figures 1 and 2; Pboto 1). The objectives of the archaeological studies presented in this report were twofold: first, to ensure a complete and current inventory of archneologicalresources on the property; and second, to evaluate whether fitly of these cultural resources met the criteria as historic properties eligible for inclusion in the NRHP. Survey of'3Z2Acres at Tongedno Road and La Cat7adn Dt1vo, Oro Valley, Adzonn Westl anti Resources, Inc. fnph»NgonJ ta�rorcnenbtConwibn:� Maprolects1i544.01\1.18.08•MllferRanch ArclFlol viclnllv.mxd ARIZONA ,_ ;,•try .� ; ;r :. � •�11at a � ; r . :� `� < jj � Y FLA STA F S7; to , PH NIX U .TUC90 l `�}:J.. PROJECT LOCATION 1 Approximate Scale P = 10 Miles 77 12 - - w� 77, I 3�1 T.11S.,R.13E. Portion of Section 34, Pima County, Arizona N ®aPE Qto Valley USGS 7.5' Ouadrengle 0 1,500 3,000 Feet 0 750 1,500 WulLand Rcsouscts.Inc. Meters 4+pra'np W W. art•c•4Wrtw, .. ...�,�' ; �/H' • • • I..iP ' �I��W : • • � .yam h!A � •..< ' � •�:A '' �• J l f •S �,\ +',psi ,�,+; ��: 1 1 � " .,r tr�,tr•! • - _ .!� ._-_-. I ` > t , ..ice r. -.:/; .. ! `I ••! ' • ° `• •.� :( %1 ,.? � �,R ` a•= . y7` '•., ./; t � , ('• j`t; `'' •• _ i �' t' "' ,11•.% J �.. , ;� f �_ � .I N�.1 •.,5; 1 �;",r, � t �� rs �,;+�.�"r� �•{",+'z . �� •� �, ', :1 a; !1 `�� ��'d � , ! '~: •r• 1' �1;ti1� �i+' �FFFFFF S� ?? !• hh Tigure 1. Vicinity map Flln! M'1nA9F SHTlnrcn,anlAmhawnlnnullwl,wr —,1 mod .� moo" tea` l•, : `"r' 1& Rf .. • thJY ROAD 1- OOrR a.4`', A; i' t: j, Y'7d ^—'1�77K «�� `r06A0 J 1I ..!_,•1 .._-71:i�?,FA_a_. (:: c:�-',. • 1 �t : '�_ ..� 1 J1�7 � • f�,,f 1 �a � - �. l k500205 `• % ,!ir E500500 • ! lA) • 34 N3588096 ,1. 1,,1 A1358p001 ,lute ` ( V ` r ; 1-.: y' / h t q r 1}N J �:yr iq i �- ' 1 ., � % - 1.-. " • 1 !7`i. N • i� t '' t v It � AI - ,• �� _ :�:,•- Ohl -... j _500300 E50042T 4 r2 ( ( . •-j lu A13567254 N3587253 41. ar ;�!:_>„c4n� a _,,,.`Aid i Y . n Rojo � s. J7 I/r(2.4 tNA/1 21 ]] \�: / " �.. , F; i1 �; r' � t T� l t � J tom`- % •,• �, .� '.1` •' � 1 r ' �! , t 3 ° v t \• `a , r t '' x'` .. t ' T.11S.,R•13E. Portion of Section 34. Pima County, Allzona N ®APE Oro Valley USGS 7.5' Quadrangle 0 1,000 2,000 Feat 1Ytn4nd Rewurm.lnr. Meters0 500 1,000 uYwetavuwJex.t7wbx Figure 2. Project locution map 4 ca2 A Class .ill Cultaral Reroutres 3 invey fog• Westland senior archaeologist. MarkL. Chenault, Pli.D., served as principal investigator for the project. The survey was conducted under Arizona, Antiquities Act Blanket Permit .No. 2008- 032bl.'I'lne fieldwork wasconducted on January 24, 2008 (one field -person day), by WestLand archaeologist Gaylen 'Tinsley. Copies of this final report will be sent to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Arizona State Museum (ASlv1) pendiig review and possible modification by the regulatory agencies involved in the project. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The Miller Ranch property is located in the Canada del Oro drainage to the west of Pusch Ridge and the Santa Catalina Mountains. (Photo 2). It falls within the Basin and Range _physiograpluc province, which Is characterized by north -to -south trending mountain ranges and deep alluvial valleys. The region has a semi -arid climate with a bimodal rainfall pattern, which distinguishes it from other subdivisions of die Sonorap Desertscrub (Sellers and mill 1974). Summer temperatures are typically hot and winter temperatures are relatively moderate. Bimodal rainfall occurs in the summer and winter, averaging 200 mm per year. Summer rains are usually short, intense afternoon rainstorms that yield 30 to 60 percent of the annual rainfall total. Winter .rains tend to be gentler and can last for several days; during this period of rainfall, the. Sonoran Desert tan receive 10 to 40 percent of the annual total. Little to no rainfall occurs betweenthe whiter and summer mars (Turner and Browo 1994: 201). The semi -arid climate supports a unique biotic community that is classi- fied as the .Arizona Upland subdivision of the Sonoran Desertscrub. The native plant life within the land- scape includes saguaro (Grnuegiea_gigaaleq), foothills palo verde (Ceirldiuvl iWav- plylNju), mesquite (Pjoropis sp.), ironwood (Obtya tesolcr), creosote (Lanva Ardenlata), ocotillo (Eouquieiia splendens), and numerous species of smaller cacti, including chain -fruit cholla (Opunlip fll&ticr), Engelmann prickly pear (O. pbaeacantba), and stagliorn cholla (O. veixicolo)), as well as desert forbs and grasses (Turner and Brown 1994:2Q0). The native Sonoran habitat supports a variety of wildlife. Fauna in the APE include desert inule deer (Odocoileus beiuionus c)noki), coyote (Carus laturns), and javelins (Dic'otyler lajacu), as well as numerous smaller mammals such as jackrabbits (L.epus sp.), cottontails (Syluilagta sp.), and cactus mouse (Pelnnlyscus emijims). 'The. biotic community also supports 1 rich diversity of bird life, including such species as Harris' hawk (Parabidee unichillts), white -winged dove (Zeuaida askance), Inca dove (Coba»bhia aura), elf owl (blicialbene iv lneyi), and flycatchers (Enlpidoluix sp). Also found iti the APE, are numerous reptiles and lizards, Eke the regal horned lizard (Pbynoroaia soleav), Gila monster (Heloderva suspecluln), Arizona coral snake (b Ammides ettgxanthns), and tiger rattlesnake (Ctnlalrrr tiers) (Turner and Brown 1994:203). The biotic community within the APE has been severely altered by mechanical bhtding, probably associated with the construction of the various Survey of37.2Aeras at Zwgerino Rood and ,La Canada Drive, Oro Valley, Adiona • f � l • 1 • f structures located on the property. Most of the native vegetation has been cleared and replaced with native and non-native plants that thrive in disturbed environments. Only two small areas of undisturbed ground were found in the APE. These were in the northern part of the parcel Mid, together, total less than 1 Ac in area. CULTURE HISTORY of SOUTHERN ARIZONA The majority of archaeological work in southern Arizona has been done under the guise of cultural resource management. Thus work is specifically directed at mitigating the effects on our shared cultural heritage brought about by road projects, dain projects, nnining projects, and a variety of other. modern development projects. As A result, the most iutensive and sustained long-term archaeological studies have occurred in urban -areas, particularly Tucson and Phoenix. Thus, the archaeological information from these two urban areas far surpasses what is known from rural areas. Other large and significant archaeological projects have occurred in rural parts of southern Arizona, but these often do not provide A full spectrum of human history or the sustained research necessary to formulate detailed culture histories. As a consequence, the culture history of many parts of southern .Arizona. is unknown or only generally known. As scientists, archaeologists should be aware of die inherent bias in the infornintion available for formulating reconstructions of human prehistory and making judgments about the causes and sources of cultural influence. With this in mind, the following culture history tries to paint the big picture of the genieral trends in prehistory and history for southern Arizona. Archaeological evidence indicates that through out prehistory and history, waves of cultutd change swept across the Southwest, resulting .in shared. cultural practices and technologies among peoples across a broad region. In constant opposition to these shared similarities were regionally and locally unique expressions of cultural identity. This blend- ing and .annealing of indigenous And exogenous cultural forces created a unique expression of human culture in each specific locality. The following is an attempt to formulate a perspective on the prehistory of southern Arizona by considering it an integrated region. The discussion is presented with regard to five main periods: MillerEmich Eck 5 Paleoindian, Archaic, Formative, Protohistoric, and I Iistoric. PALL+OINDUN (CA..11,500-10,500 B.r./9500-8500 B.c.) The first inhabitants of southern Arizona are referred to by archaeologists As Paleoindians. They were a nnigratory, nomadic hunting people who roamed Across North America at the end of the. Pleistocene epoch. Two diagnostic characteristics of Paleoindians are 1) large fluted, lanceolate projectile points and 2) the association of these points with the fossil remains of now extinct animals, particular- ly mainmoth (Mammulhu. spp.) and ancient bison (Hiron witipus) (Reid and Whittiesey 1997:30-37). While originally conceptualized as purely "big -game hunters," Paleoindians are now known to have ex- ploitcd plant resources in ways akin to latex Archaic peoples (Iblabry 1998d; Reid -and Whittlesey 1991). The oldest evidence of human occupation in the Southwest is attributed to the Clovis complex. This complex is identified by a distinctive lanceolate spear point with a concave base, longitudinal fluting, and lateral and marginal grinding (Slaughter 1992:72). Several important Clovis sites are located in the upper San Pedro River valley of southeastern Arizona, including Naco, L.chner, Escapule, and Murray Springs (Faught and larcemann 1998:41). Much of the evidence for a Clovis presence in Arizona is reflected in isolated occurrences of Clovis points (either whole or in fragments). For example, Clovis points have been found in the St, Johns and Winslow areas (Faught and Freeman 1998:44; Neily 1985:10). A "Clovis -style" point is also known from the Sanchez area near Safford (Seymour et al. 1997:1-8). Paleoindia n .period isolates have also been identified in the Bylas viciuty near Globe Qolnnson anti Wasley 1966). The Folsom complex succeeded the Clovis complex. Folsom, like Clovis, is idendGed by a distinctive style of projectile point Folsom points are also lanceolate, fluted spear points; however, Folsom points are distinguished from Clovis points by the extent of the fluting. The flutes of Folsom points extend the full length of the blade, from the proximal to the distal end. In addition, the .margins of these points were retouched after fluting. In Arizona, Folsom points have been found only .in surfacecontexts on the Colorado Plateau and in. the mountainous Mogollon Rim country (Faught and Freeman 1998:45). �� �, Westland Resources, Inc, Fnpixainp ad Finronrantal ConwHa ab 6 era A Gass III Cullinal Resoarros Sravey for A third .Paleoihdian "complex," known as the Plainview, is a late Pleistocene or early Holocene Palcoindian tool tradition represented on the Colorado Plateau and in the Southern Basin and Range province (although not, to date, elsewhere in Arizona). Plainview points comprise several subtypes, including Meseme, Milnesand, and Belen points. All of these points resemble Clovis points in their basic configuration, but are unfluted (Faught and Freeman 1998:47). A Plainview point was discovered on the bajada of the Winchester Mountains in the Sulphur Springs Valley (Carlson et al. 1989). ARCHAIC (cA. 8500 n.c.-A.D.1) The transition from the Paleoindian to die Archaic period correlates -with a change. in die environment that distinguishes die Holocene epoch from the preceding Pleistocene epoch. Whereas Paleoindian cultures are characterized as big -game Bunters, Archaic cultures are perceived as getncralizcd hunters and .gatherers (Mabry 1997:4), sustaining themselves through die liuntitig of large game aninals and the gathering of a broad spectrum of plant foods. The transition probably was not abruipt, and some have suggested that the two subsistence strategies overlapped temporally and possibly spatially (Faught and Freeman 1998:50). Nevertheless, 8500 B.C. is taken as the starting point of the Archaic period because it was around this time that a ground stone tool industry consisting of handstones and netherstones became -common across the Southwest (Huckell 1996:306, 327). Several regional Archaic traditions are recognized: the Cochise tradition -across southern Arizona, northwestern Chilnialma, and northern Sonora (Sayles 1983); the Oshara tradition on die Colorado Plateau (Irwhi Williams 1967); the San Dieguito-Pinto tradition in southwestern Arizona, western -California, and southern Nevada (Hayden 1967, 1976; Rogers 1966); die Hueco Basketmaker complex in western 'Texas and southeastern New Mexico; and the Fiontera complex in the northern Mexican state of Coahuila and northeastern Chilimliva. In recognition of the inany cultural sinilarities that characterized these local traditions, Irvin -Williams (1967,1979) suggested that each was a manifestadoli of on overarching cultural tradition she termed die Plmsa caltrnr. Further consideration of -this. issue led Huckell (IIttckell 19841, 1984b, 1988) to suggest that the Cochise culture and its counterparts be referred to collectively as the Soutb)vesteni Airbaic. Of direct concern to this overview of prehistory is the Basin and Range physiographic region encompassed by the Cochise culture (Saylcs 1983; Sayles and Antevs 1941). 'Phis region was 1,1ter occupied by the Hohokam, Mogollon, and. Trinclneras cultural traditions. Sayles (1983) originally defined three sequential phases for the Cochise archaic culture: the Sulphur Springs, Chiricahua, and Snn Pedro phases. The Archaic period in southern Arizona is still divided into three main parts, but the formulation of the phases and the naming of the last period in the sequence have been revised based on recent archaeological explorations and findings. The oldest periods are. referred to simply as the Early and Middle Archaic. These correspond to. Saylcs' Sulphur Springs and Chiricalhua phases. The third and last period is referred to alternatively as the Late Archaic period or the Early Agrlcultuml period, The latter label acknowledges the adoption and development of agriculture and die cultivation of maize during the last jnillennitun and a half of the Archaic period (Huckell 1995; Mabry 1997, 1998d). Admittedly, the development of maize agriculture, wluclh includes forms of canal and ditch irrigation, is a substantial diversion from die original concept of the Archaic; however, maize has also been found at Middle Archaic period sites that precede the Early Agricultural period by about a millennium. For this reason, and for simplicity of structure, die Archaic period is discussed herein in terms of the .three divisions of Early, Middle, and Late. Early Archaic (ca. 8500-6000 a.c.) The Early Archaic period of tic Cochise culture is known as the Sulphur: Springs phase. Saylcs and Antevs originally defined this phase in 1941-un die Sulplhur Springs Valley of southeastern Arizona (Reid and Whitdesey 1997:44, 45). Problems with dating (the. work having taken place prior to the development of carbon dating teclhlhiciues) originally led Sayles to the conclutjoii that a Paleoindiati tradition (typified by the exploitation of megafauna) co -existed widh a hunting -and -gathering tradition that exploited smaller game atid various plant resources (as reflected in an ardfaxt assemblage composed of flat milling stones, unifacial scrapers, and other lithic iiiplemeuts). This assessment turned out to. be ihcortect0iowever, re-examination of the Sulphur Springs material did establish a SurvcyoP37:2Acres at Tangerine Road andLa Cafinda DrIve, Oro W ley, Arizona reliable beginning date of ca. 8500 H.C.. for the Sulphur Springs phase. In southeastern Arizona, few diagnostic projectile points recovered from Early Archaic sites can be directly correlated with the Sulphur Springs phase, and sites dating to .this epoch are not always recogttizable when they lack other, more direct, methods of dating, such as radiocarbon (Huckell 1996:329). Elsewhere in the Southwest, however, archaeologists have identified several early IIolo- cene "complexes" differentiated by particulars of projectile point morphology (although .whether these complexes belong to die "Paleoindian" or the "Early Archaic." is a matter of some debate [Mabry and Faught 1998:55)). One of these complexes is known as the Western Stemmed Point complex snd includes the 17 stemmed "Ventana-Amargosa P' points recovered by Plamy under Mlle ltcd Sand deposit in Wiltana Cave. Tile stratign'aplllc location of these points suggests their manufacture and deposit some time after 6700 B.C. Other projectile point complexes include the Jay points of the Osllara Tradition :end the Lake Mojave and Silver Lake points of the Mojave Desert and lower Colorado River valley (Mabry and Faught 1998:54). Middle Archaic (ca. 6000-1500 s.c) The Middle Archaic period of the Cochise culture is known as the Chiricallua phase. It Is characterized by the addition of shallow basin inetates, mortars and pestles, bifacial tools, and distinctive side -notched projectile points (Chiri- callua points) to the overall tool assemblage. Generally, the Middle Archaic period Was a time when regional variations in the. material culture across the Southwest became less pronounced. In particular, projectile points take on -a similarity of design over large geographic regions. .Chiricahua points, for example, are similar in style and manufacture technique to Northern Side -Notched, Pinto, and San Jose points, all found in .other areas of Arizona (Slaugliter 1992:70): It is also during die Middle Archaic that evidence of permanent or semi- permatent domestic architecture appears (although bands of people probably remained highly mobile), and the first Mesoamerican cultigens (including tunize) probably arrived in the Southwest, perhaps as early as 2000 B.C: (Huckell 1996:343). During the Middle Archaic, the Southwest and southeastern _California experienced the Altithermal Miller Ranch Eo 7 interval of the Middle Holocene. This time of environmental change was characterized by n peak in average seasonal temperatures (tile highest experienced since die .end of the Pleistocene) and greatly increased aridity, resulting in -the drying up of lakes and previously perennial rivers and streams. This, in turn, resulted in the .abandonment 'of areas that had been previously rich in resources and a general movement to the wetter plateatt areas. Following the Altithermal interval, and a corres- ponding improvement in environmental conditions, Arcb,lic peoples returned to the desert basins. An important addition to the Middle Archaic, period lifeway was maize. Recent investigation into the adoption of maize across the Southwest puts the current threshold for the use of this plant at.about 2100 B.C. (Mabry 200.5a). Although the archaeo- logical evidence places the use of maize in the latter part of the Middle Archaic period, this evidence is too recent and too sparse to evaluate What, if any, impacts the presence of a cultivated crop had on the Middle Archaic lifeway. Late Archaic (ca.1500 B.C.-A.D.1) Changes in population, settlement patterns, :and subsistence strategies around 1500 B.C. distinguish the Late Archaic period from the preceding Middle Archaic period (Gilman 1995; Huckell 1988, 1990, 1995; Irvin -Williams 1979; Mabry 1998a; Matson 1991; Roth 1996; Whalen 1971). These changes are linked to four interrelated factors: 1) an increasing regionalism among Late Archaic groups, resulting apparently from an increase iti population relative to carrier times; 2) die existence of a broad -based interaction network that allowed for the rapid dissemination of infonnation and -materials; 3) die increasing importance of maize in the diet as seen in the development and spread of agriculture; and 4) the appearance of large settlements that are, perhaps,. the first expressions of sedentary village life (Mabry 1998d). The changes.resulting from the interaction of these four factors set the stage for what was to happen during the Fonnative period. Archaeological sites attributed to the Late Archaic period are more numerous across the landscape than earlier Archaic period sites. This could be explained in a number of ways, including sampling biases, archaeological visibility; shifts in settlement patterns With an increase in the number and types of settlements occupied in a given Westland Resources. Inc. ErgHe�Nq and Em4arnenld (.aiuNaM � 8 e�211 Clary III Crrlirnrrl di.eroturer Srn�ey for occupational cycle; or a change to a generally more dispersed settlement pattern. Without entirely discouriting any of these alternatives, the preferred explanation is that. the increased number of sites is the result of an increase in the number of people doe to population growth, migration, .or some conibitindon of both (Berry 1982; Matson 19.91), The Late Archaic peoples had a versatile set of subsistence technologies. They had inherited from previous generations, an effective hunting and - foraging subsistence adaptation, and the introduction of maize in the latter * part of the Middle &-chaic period provided another valuable resource for minimizing subsistence risk. Using these subsistence strategies, die Irate Archaic peoples were particularly well suited for adapting to a variety of environmental conditions, which, in turn, enabled thetas to establish population centers hi most of the desert basins and river valleys of Arizona (Huckell 1990, 1995; 1tvin Williams 4979; Matson 1991; Roth 1996; Wills 1988). These population centers seem to have consisted of eco- nomically self-sufficient and politically autonomous groups with dominion over defined territories (see Mittlesey [1998j fora related discussion of Forma- tive period social organization). The boundaries of these territories were prescribed by die availability of exploitable resources and the physnographic features of the landscape. Relying oil geoclhetnical studies of obsidian from Middle and Late Archaic sites, Shackley (1996) demonstrates a constriction in procurement territories from the Middle to Late Archaic period, suggesting a trend of decreasing group mobility among the Late Archaic peoples. Establishment of distinct territories did not inhibit the exchange of goods or the dissemination of information. A network of alliances fostered interaction and exchange that resulted vi the rapid transmission of ideas and goods (Irvin -Williams 197968). The existence of some sort of information -sharing network is evidenced by die .nearly synclhronolus adoption of maize across widely 'separate regions of the Southwest. A review in .fltrbaeology Southwest (Gregory 1999-8, 9. [ed.]) of radiocarbon dating of early maize in the greater Southwest shows that the spread of agriculture was essentially it contemporaneous phenomenon across the region (see also Hard and Merrill 1992; .Hard and Roney 1998; I lucke111990,1995, Matson 1991; Wills 1988). Siinilarly, the widespread exchange of marine shell jewelry (Howard 1987,, L. Huckell 1993; Vokes 1998a, 1998b) and shared stylistic patterns in the material culture (Huckell 1984a, 1984b, 1988; Itwin-Williams 1979:38) •also attest to the existence of an exchange network. As a measure of the breadth of this system, marine shell and other objects found at Late Archaic sites in the middle Santa Cruz ltivec valley indicate ..a network reaching to the Gulf of California oil die southwest and to the Pacific Occan on the west. (L. Huckell 1993; Vokes 1998a,1998b). The Late Archaic peoples' ability to adapt to a variety of environments was largely due to their knowledge of foraging, hunting, and fsuihhing. Foraging ;and hunting was die inheritance handed down from their Ivtiddle Archaic ancestors. Panning was the wave of the fiiture. Tile adoption and spread of agriculture sometime prior to 150.0 a(,. had a pronounced impact oil the. cultural trajectory of the Southwest. Maize was adopted in the southwestern United States by 210013.C., and by 900 H.C., irrigation canals and ditches were being constructed for farming. It is interesting to note that even though die spread of agriculture was extensive and rapid, it. was not uniformly adopted across the Southwest (Gilman ct al. 1995; iVlauldin 1993; Roth 1996; Stone and Bostwick 1995). Some groups seem to have been able to sustain essentially permanent settlements by intensifying their exploitation of native plants, particularly legumes (Fish et al. 1990; Halbiut et, al. 1993; Stone and Bostwick 1995:25, 26). Tlhis apparent increase in legume consumption may have had as pronounced ath impact on Late Archaic adaptitlons as did agriculture. liven in areas where agriculture was adopted early, such as the Tucson Basin, there appear to be sites witlhim the settlement system that are dedicated to foraging and hunting activities (Roth 1992,1996). Evidence of die cultivation of maize, beans, ;ind squash has been found at many sites of this period across southern Arizona, but most notably in the Tucson Basin and in the San Pedro River and Cienega Creek valleys (e.g., Diehl 19973 2005; Liddy and Cooley 1983; Gasser and IGviatkowski 1991; Huckell 1990, 1995; Mabry 1998d, 2005b). Huckell (1996) has suggested that the adoption of .agriculture correlates widh a period of cooler summer temperatures and decreased precipitation that occurred Around 3,000 years ago. I-Ie goes oil to. surmise that 'cooler summer temperatures, despite lessened precipitation, may have created greater Survey of37.2Acres at Tangcxlhe Rond and La Cafinda Drive, Oro Valley, Arizona levels .of effective moisture, which would in turn have created better conditions during the growing season" (Huckell 1996:35, 36). In southern Arizona, agriculture appears to have been first adopted in low -elevation desert valleys with predictable and m;unageable streams.'i'hese.locations may.have been suited to the early adoption and development of agriculture, not only because they were desirable farming locations, but because the surrounding environments would have contained plentiful native food resources within a relatively short distance of the farmlands (see also Stone and Bostwick 1995:19). These resources would have helped hedge subsistence stress in times of agricultural failure. In most regions of southern Arizona where archaeological surveys have been conducted, Late Archaic sites have been found in two zones: (1) on. the :floodplains and terraces along rivers, and (2) at the mountain fronts (Altschul et al. '1997; Huckell. 1988, 1990; Roth 1992, 1996; Vanderpot 1997; Whalen 1971). These settlement locations would have provided ready access to the rich variety of valley and mountain resources (Roth 1992, 19.96:39). Between these two nodes of settlement are strings of smaller sites and isolated artifacts that ;appeat to represent the use of resources occurring in the intervening landscape. Investigations at a number of the lowland settlements along the Santa Cruz River in the Tucson Basin (Freeman 1998; Gregory 1999, Mabry and Archer 1997) have revealed the beginnings: of village life. Evidence of communal behavior, including food production, Eood.s.torage, and public architecture;:and indications of social differentiation and social integration exist at these sites, Pit wutctures of the. period 1500=80011.C. tend to be small .oval structures with no obvious evidence of interior structural supports. Many of these structures have suubfloor storage pits and informal ]Hearths (Eddy and Cooley 1983:17; Ezzo and Deaver. 1998, Huckell 1990, 1995; Huckell and Huckell 1984; bfitbry 1990, 1998b; Sayles 1983; Sayles and Antevs 1941). Pit structures after 800 B.C. were larger, ranging from 3 mz to 45 mz and averaging about 8 m2 Pabny 1998b:219; 220). These structures were also more consistently circular to oval iH shape, with interior postholes, suggesting a more substantial superstructure than preceding structures (Jabry 1998b). Lange suibfloo storage pits and the absence of formal hearths were still characteristic (Mabry 199.8b). Miller RanvIi Bo 9 Large settlements, some with several hundred houses, have been found along Cienega Creek (I•Iuckell 1990, '1995) and along the Santa Cruz River near Tucson (Freeman 1998; Gregory 2004' Mabry and Archer 1997). The scale of these sites may not indicate the presence of a singularly large populace, but rather the accumulation of features .and debris that resulted from the repeated occupancy by groups of a more. modest size (Gregory 1999). Even so, the sheer scale of these settlements, their architectural style, the diversity of activities indicated by the variety of features and artifacts, and the clearly planned arrangement of features relative to one another bespeak a level of village life not known from earlier periods. At the larger settlements along the middle Santa Cruz River valley, the differentiation in architectural forms, settlement organization, and material culture suggests an increasing degree of social complexity. At the Santa .Cruz Bend site along the east bank of the Santa Cruz River in Tucson, there exists a dichotomy between the big houses and the small houses (Mabry 1997:2). The site comprises several house clusters, each characterized by the presence of it relatively large circular structure surrounded by several smaller circular strictures. The large central structure typically contains large storage pits. The size of these structures, their central location relative to the other houses, and the presence of storage pits suggest that these facilities served a unique role, perhaps as an integrative .and social focal point. A similar big 'lnouse=small house dichotomy was observed at Coffee Camp, where the big house contained many items suggestive of a special .or ritual use (Halbirt et al: 1993: 87-91). This big house. phenomenon was once thought to have been a diagnostic characteristic of the Early Formative period .(e.g., Agua Caliente phase settloneuts in the Tucson Basin. [Ciolek-Torrello 19.95, 1998a:3], Early Pithouse period Mogollon settlements in the Nfimbres area [Anyon et al. 1981), and the Viejo please in Chihuahua, blexieo [Di Peso et al. 1974)), but it is now clear that it is part of the Late Archaic period culture after 800 B.C. The Late Archaic material culture is surprisingly diverse. -The bulk of the inventory is made up of utilitarian stone tools that reflect the processing of plant and anmal subsistence resources. There are also objects of animal boric, 'shell, stone, and ceramic, which are presumed to have been items of personal .adornment or .of ritual use. The most WestLatud Resources, Inc. IaQb8*4WandfWkW Wa1Coa0M1s 1.0 eat A Clara III Callwal Resow es Sinvey for• diverse inventories of material culture containing the most elaborate artifacts have been .found at settlements along the rivers acid streams of southern Arizona. These items include cruciforms, stone nose plugs, phyllite wands, stone cloud -blower pipes, stone jewelry, ceratnic figurities, ceramic beads, .small ceramic containers, and shell jewelry (Halbirt et al. 1993-,I-Ieidke 1999; Howard 1987; Huckell 1995; Kisselberg 1989; Mabry 1998a,1999; Roth 1989). Mortuary practices of the Late Archaic period demonstrate recurring. patterns across a broad region. A review of 'these practices by Mabry (1998c:711) for the Late Archaic period identifies three kinds of burial practices: primary inhumation, secondary inhumation, and secondary cretmation. Inhumation is clearly the dominant mortuary practice (Nfabty 1998c:712); however,, cremation burials have also been 'documented iii central Arizona (Haury 1986a), southern Arizona (Dongoske 1993), and far to the cast in the Guadalupe Mountains of New Mexico. (Howard 1932:67--69). Primary in liumation, which was the most frequent practice, involved the body of the deceased being placed in the grave in a flexed position (1-luckell 1988:64, 1995; Maury 1998c; Mabry .and Archer 1997:190-198; Sayles 1983; Thiel and Mabry -1998), although occasionally, the body was buried in an extended position (Hayden 1967:339; Mabry 1998c:Table 16.2). When. flexed, the body may have been placed on its side, on its back, or in An upright, seated position (Nfabty 1998c.-Table 16.2). Much less common were secondary inhumation burials, which contained wholly or -partially disarticulated remains (Hemmings et al. 196.8:17; Huckell .1995:48-50; Mabry 1998c; lvlabty and Archer 1997; Thiel and Mabry 1998). Mabry (1998c) lists five secondary inhumations. Of these, one is the remains of a disarticulated juvenile, another is the articulated bones of an adult Band, and the remaining three are the remains of two to seven individuals. Material items were often buried with the remains of the deceased. 'flue most complete inventories of funerary accompaniments have been found At sheltered sites. The bulk of the materials associated with the -graves were perishable materials, such as animal skins, animal -fir blankets, woven mats, fur robes, pouches, cradleboards, sandals, .fiver cordage, fragments of cotton textiles, and baskets (Mabry 1998c:Table 16.2). Nonperishable materials included items such as projectile points, cloud -blower pipes, ochre (either as lumps or spread .over did body), bone tools, stone pendants, shell pendants, shell beads,.metates, and handstones (1vtabiy'1998c:Tablc 16.2). Secondary cremations attributed to the Late Archaic period are known from three locations in the Southwest: central Arizona, southern Arizona, and southeastern New Mexico (Dongoske 1993; Haury 1986a; Howard 1932; Mabry 1998c). In southern Arizona, two secondary cremations were found along the lower Santa Cruz River valley at the Coffee Camp site (Dongoske' 1993). Even though the bodies were cremated, material goods were still interred with the remains, including projectile pouts, stone blades, stone tools, concretions, bone tools, basketry,_ And red ochre (Haury 1986a). Apparently, even though the body and some of the material items had been burned, cremated individuals were afforded runny of the same accoutrements as those who were inluunated. The discussion of mortuary practices and ritual behavior in southern Arizona would not be complete without mention of the burials of a .juvenile bear and a domestic dog at true Santa Cruz Bend site ([Mabry and Archer 1997:198). Both had been .intentionally buried, though neither was afforded any nonperishable offerings. Despite the lack of offerings, the interments speak of a level of xespect and ritual behavior that was apparently afforded to animals as well as to liumalis. . To summarize, the Late Archaic period was a time .of important cultural developments, which set the stage for the subsequent Formative period. The increased occurrence of sites attributed to this period probably reflects an increase in population across the Southwest. This increase in population was in some part fostered by .the adoption of an agricultural subsistence technology prior to t:.ti 15QQ.11:C:. Large settlements. were constructed along the Santa. Cruz River, Cienega Creek,. and the San Pedro River, seemingly in response to the success of farmilig and the possibility of using stored surplus: to support larger populations.. 'I'he arrangement of sutictures -.and other facilities at some of these °sites suggests a growing conuilitinetnt to village living, including recognizable manifestations of social differentiation and attempts at social integration. An attachment to "place" is also malufested by the repeated and enduring use of particular settlements with formal cemeteries. The complex interplay Snrvcy of3R2Acres w Tangerine Bond and La Cnliada Drive, Oro Valley; Arlxona among these trends resulted in a mosaic of local groups across the Southwest. It is from this mosaic that the next step toward .cultural differentiation was taken. FOItMAnvE PERIOD (A.D.1-1450) The Formative period is differentiated from the Archaic period by the addition of pottery to the material culture repertoire. The Formative period in southern and central Arizona is typically considered synchronous with the tenure of the Hohokam culture. This may or may not be the case (see Deaver and Ciolek-Torrello 1995; DiPeso 1956). The conventional idea that the Hohokam cultural. tradition begins with the appearance of pottery ut central and southern Arizona still needs to be researched and evaluated. These issues will be presented below. But concerns about cultural identity affect decisions about the most appropriate paradigin for presenting a summary for this portion of prehistory. Two different paradigms are available. The first is the Hohokam cultural chronology, which has been the standard for most archaeo- logists. The second paradigm divorces itself from the developmental dynamics of a specific culture area by, instead, linking its divisions to cultural processes, trends, and events that occur synchronously across a broad area. Each paradigm is sutmnarizcd and contrasted below. The Hohokam culture is segmented into a sequence of four cultural periods. From oldest to youngest, these are the Pioneer, Colonial, Sedentary, and Classic. periods (Gladwin 1965; Hauiy 1976, 1978). In their original formulation, these periods represent the thesis that the Holiokatn culture derives from Mesoamerican immigrants who "pioneered" a new way of life in -the Gila and Salt river valleys of Arizona. After a few centuries of development, the descendents of the original fin nvgrants "colonized" most of the adjoining river valleys of. central and southern Arizona using their sophisticated technological, social, political, and religious systems. Once in place, tine Hohokam colonists became "sedentlry" agriculturalists. A few centuries later, the a-Iohokam culture reached its zenith, or "classic" cultural development. The Hohokam cultural sequence was formulated on the notion that the valleys radiating outward from the Gila and Salt rivers were uninhabited or that 'the bottomlands were unused by the l'Will ei Ranch M 11 indigenous Archaic peoples. An alternative model for southern Arizona was formulated by Di -Peso (19.56), who postulated that the river valleys were already inhabited by agricultural peoples whom he referred to as the O'otam. In DiPeso's scenario, the O'otatn were subjugated by the Hohokam, but.after a few centuries, reasserted and :freed themselves from Iohokam oppression. Two theories on the origins of the Hohokam culture dominate the literature: first, that it derived from immigrants who ascend to dominance because of their impressive technologies and scale of cultural development; and second,, that it derived from an in -place development from the preceding Late Archaic culture with -more Mesoamerican overtones resulting from the transmission of knowledge and ideas across vast regions. Recent archaeological evidence provides resounding proof that the river valleys of central and southern Arizona were inhabited and farmed during the Late Archaic period by relatively substantial populations of indigenous peoples endowed with technologies.and a scale of cultural development more impressive than previously accepted. This new evidence also :reveals that. over a vcry large area, the first pottery -making peoples shared similar subsistence technologies, architectural forms; tool assemblages, tnortuaty customs, and other cultural traits (Deaver and Ciolek Torrello 1995; Whittlesey et Al. 1994). These shared sins laritles encompass the regions that are conventionally recognized as the Hohokam, Mogollon, and Ancestral Pueblo (formerly known as the Atnasazi) culture areas. The alternative to the Hohokam cultural sequence is a tripartite division of the Formative period into three smaller periods referred to simply as Early, Middle, and Late. This tluee-part division of the Formative period cvrrespottds closely to DiPeso's (1956) outline of prehistory, fihe Early - Middle -Late divisions also correspond thematically to. DiPeso's outline, which recognizes the Hohm oka culture as a major influence in the prehistory of central and southern Arizona. The Early, Middle, and bate Formative periods are equivalent to DiPeso's Formative O'otath, Hohokam Intrusion, and O'otam Reassertion periods, respectively. Put quite simply, the Early-lvliddle-Late divisions represent the tune before the Hohokam, the time of the Hohokam, and the time .after the Hohokam (Deaver and Van West 2001:20-24). Westland Resources; Inc. EigHe�Mq and Enhanrtxnfd ConwHant; 12 era A Class III Cullinal Resorurer Survey for The three Fontiative periods also correspond generally to the Hohokam cultural sequence (Gladwin et al. 1937; Haury 1978). The Early Formative period encompasses the Pioneer period through the end of the Sweetwater phase. The Middle Formative period begins with the Snaketown phase of the Pioneer period and covers the Colonial and Sedentary periods. The Late Formative period corresponds to the Classic period. The slight mismatch in the two sequences results from looking at Hoholcann prehistory from the so- called Hohokam peripheries: the Papagueria,. the Tucson Basin,. the upper Santa Cruz River valley, the lower Santa Cruz River valley, the Gila Bend region; the San Pedro Rover valley, the Safford Basin, southeastern Arizona, and the Tonto Basin. The cultural traditions in these peripheries were affected by far -teaching cultural, environmental, and cosmological phenomena. These phenomena provide a similar structure .and rhythm to the prehistoric traditions seen in all of these regions. The cultural expressions and trajectories of each of these peripheries are singularly unique, however. It is the responses by the indigenous peoples to these far-reaching phenomena that give rise to unique local culture histories. An outline of prehistory for central and southcni Arizona from this perspective is presented below. Early Formative Period (A.D.1-700): The late Archaic Legacy Trends set in motion during the 1,500 years spanned by the Late ilrchaic period continued uninterrupted well into the first nvllennium A.D. Early Formative period peoples continued along a course toward. reliance out agriculture, seacittary village life, and refinement in .adaptive strategies that evenwally led to the emergence of the regional cultural traditions. recognizable as the Hohokam, Mogollon, and Ancestral Pueblo (Deaver and Ciolck-Torrello 1995). One of the themes that characterized due Late Archaic period was the development of regional and local cultural traditions that were as similar as they were dissitnilat. This situation developed on the one hand from population growth, constriction of procurement areas, and die development of territories, and on the other hand from the existence of a broad -scale interaction network that fostered the exchange of goods and the sharing of technologies. 'Phis theme continues through the Early Formative period. There was a perpetual contradiction between the conformity to wide-ranging cultural and techno- logical trends and the uniquely localized expressions of those trends. What retrained was a cultural landscape characterized by autonomous settlement systems occupying the river valleys and basins of southern Arizona interconnected by an interaction network that fostered the exchange of goods and information. This is evidenced by the presence of exotic artifacts such as shell and in the similarities of locally produced goods such as pottery. The movement of goods between groups, however, occurs at a relatively low level, and the evidence seems to suggest a uniform access to these goods. The presence of an overarching influential regional culture is lacking. Similarities in settlement locations and flaked and ground stone industries and the practice of a mixed agriculture and foraging subsistence strategy, as revealed by previous and modern archaeological findings, support die thesis of continuity between Late Archaic cultures and formative pottery -making, sedentary, agricultiral cultures across the southern Southwest (Bowen 1976; Cable and Doyel 1987; Ciolek-Torrello 1998a; DiPeso 1956, 1979; Doyel 1995; Elson and Lindeman 1994; Gilman 1995; Haury 1957, 1986a; Hayden 1970; _Johnson 1960; McGuire and Villalpondo C. 1993; Roth 1996; Sayles -1945; Schroeder 1957; Wallace et al. 1995). The Early Formative period wasnot, however, simply the Late Archaic with pottery. The adoption of a pottery technology, an eventual elaboration in the forms and uses of pottery, the construction of more formal and larger houses, a shift from circular to rectangular floor platns,.and the building of more permanent and enduring settlements all indicated a new configuration in economy and social organiza- tion (Ciolck-Torrello 1998a:254; Whitdcsey and Ciolek-Torrello 10656). The addition of pottery containers to the Early Formative period material repertoire was one of the first new technological innovations to occur. Three pottery horizons that serve as chronological markers are recognized for the.Southwest during this period: the Plain Ware horizon (A.D.1—L.00); the Red Ware horizon (A.D. 400=650); and the Broadline horizon (A.D. 650-700) (Deaver 1989a, 1989b, 199$, Deaver and Ciolek-Torrello 1995). The broad trends in pottery development from plain wares to red wares to broad -line -painted wares provide a convenient tool for monitoring cultural development and Survey of37.2Acres at Tangerine Road and La Caflada Drive, Oro Fafley, Arizona xecognizing differences among .groups in various regions. It is difficult to differentiate the roles that population growth, agricultural dependence, and sedendsm had oil shaping. the .Early Formative period culture. The position taken .here is simply that these three occurred in concert with one another. With increashtg population, the localized settlement systems that were conjectured for the Late Archaic period became more firmly established within territories :as groups continued to refine adaptive strategies. to the diverse qualities of the southwestern landscape. Roth (1996:3) observes that "tine variabifity.in adaptations between groups in different portions of the southern Southwest is more apparent than differences between Late Archaic and Early Ceramic period occupations within one region." The autonomous local settlement systems postulated for the Late,Archnic period appear now to have become established. Boundaries bctveen local groups of the Early Formative period, as in the Late Archaic, probably were defined by physiographic features and the distribution of vital subsistence resources. Despite the continued development of localized settlement systems and the differentiation between these local systems, movement of peoples .and goods over relatively long distances was common. The river systems were the most likely corridors for travcl,.interaction, and information flow. Tine large- scale, low-level ititeraction network of the Late Archaic was still in place. This is seen iln tine sharing of similar cultural practices among widely dispersed groups, the .continued long-distance exchange of marine shell (Howard 1987), and the discovety of exogetious pottery among the ceramic. assemblages of local traditions. Whether this pottery was traded as a cohlniodity itself or .as 1 container for some other commodity (such as seeds) is unknown. The distances represented by these pots are impressive. For example, San Francisco Red from tine Nfogollotn region around the Gila Rider head- waters was found in die early Pioneer phases at Snaketown (Igauty 1976). Likewise, plain brown ware pottery technologically similar to traditions of the northern Mogollon region was recovered from the Early Formative deposits at the Dairy site and the Houghton Road site, both in the Tucson Basin (`'Vhittlesey 1998). These suggest movements and exchange on the order of several hundred kilometers. MillerRanch m 13 Pottery studies at Early Formative period sites in the'llucson Basin provide evidence for considerable movement of commodities within settlement systems (Heidke '1998; Huckell 1987; Whittlesey 1998). These studies suggest that populations were either still highly mobile or were trading for pottery or the commodities transported in the pottery. The fact that these early pots 'were probably first used for seed storage OX/hittlesey 1998 Whitticsey and Ciolek-Torrello 1996) would serve to amplify either model. People may have transported seeds from remote farming settleme'its to villages or traded for seeds among kin and acquaintances. In conjunction with the evidence for increasing exchange of commodities within settlement systems, there is a regional .trend in decreasing access to exotic goods such as sliell and obsidian from Late Archaic period sites to Early Formative period sites. This decrease in die exchange of exotic goods is also represented by shifts in the species of shells acquired. There is a sharp decline in the amount of ,nacreous shell, particularly the species from die Pacific Coast of southern California (Vokes 1998a,1998b, 2005). Three possible factors are offered here for the decline in exotic commodities. First, the number of items moving over the regional exchange system may have been relatively constant; however, as the number of consumers increased, the availability of these commodities would have decreased. Second, :tlie nuniber of items moving across the systeirin may have declined, likewise reducing availability. Thud, the character of the regional network may 'have started to undergo restructuring and realignment as a result of the increasing nurnber of local, autonomous settlement systems. As more people and more population clusters appeared across the landscape, negotiations 'for exotic goods may have become more complicated, with the goods having to pass through. a greater number of hands. Each factor may hove played some part, but changes 7n the structure of the regional exchange system may have been the primary factor. Various combinations of foraging, farming, and hunting were adopted. The relative mixture of these three strategies. varies from one locality to the next. It is perhaps in the unique combination of these three strategies that the effects of the physiographic environment on the cultural traditions axe evident. Variations in the diet and subsistence economies probably reflect die mixture of available resources WestLand Resources, Inc. f aplxa4ip and Grriamienlal Cmwtba4 14 (�2 A Class III 01MMI Reroinret Smvey jo• in the environment. A consistent trend, however, was an increasing reliance on agricultural products and a decreasing emphasis on hunting, particularly of large .game. Given the presence of irrigation canals and ditches in the Tucson Basin by about 1200 It.C. 02zzo and Deaver 1998) and in the lower Salt River at about A.D.1 (Henderson 1989), it is clear that these Early Formative period groups were devoted to agriculture. However, in portions of southeastern Arizona, foraging may have persisted as the dominant adaptation, and agricultural dependency may not have occurred until much later (Mauldin 1993). Continuity between Late Archaic and Early Formative period tool assemblages is apparent. The Late Archaic inventory of milling implements was still present, but new were the rectangular nnaao and the open-end trough metate (Adams 1998; Huckell 1998). Continuity bawan Late Archaic and Early Formative Elakcd stone implements is evident as well. The dominant trend is a reduction in the bifacc technology, wliich correlates with 'the adoption of the how and arrow and a different technology for making arrow points. Studies of local settlement systems have demon- strated a continuation of the dual settlement pattern seen in the Late Archaic, one in which larger, semi- permanent farmsteads are located in the river valleys and smaller, seasonal settlements with structures are situated along the bajadas surrounding the valleys (Cable and. Doyel 1987; Gilman 1995; Huckell 1984a:260, 1987; Lightfoot 1984, Roth 1993; Whalen 1971). Architectural forms diversify. Some of this diversity may correspond to function or seasonality of use, but other differences result from a shift in tine character of house construction, At settlements along the floodplains of rivers, there is an increase in the formality of the houses: the house pits are frequently much Bleeper than preceding Late Archaic period pit.stnutures; floors are more often plastered; clay -lined hearths -are more common; subfloor storage Bits are not as conrumon and die total volume of subfloor storage pits decreases; and a new feature is added to tie architecture: plastered pilasters on either side of the dootivay into tine house (Anyon et at. 1981; Ciolek-Torrello 1995, 1998b; Gibmain 1988; Mabry 1998b). Rectangular floor plans appear early in this period in conjtinc- tion with circular floor plans more reminiscent of Late Archaic houses (Bernatd-Shaw 1989; Ciolek- Torrello 1995, 1998a; Hairy 1936; Mabty 1998b). By the end of this period, however, rectangular floor plans have become die dominant form. In contrast to the formality of the Douses at the permanent sites, the houses at the seasonal or temporary satlemcnnts resemble more the small informal houses that characterized the Late Archaic period (Cable and Doyel 1987; Ciolck-Torrello :1998b; Henderson 1989). Atiother key architectural trait suggests continuity in the social stricture and organization of these settlements, that is, the big house -small house dichotomy (Anyonn et .it. 1981; Ciolek-Ton ello 1995, 1998b; Mabry 1998b). Evidence has not yet been compiled to determine whether the settlement plan consisting of a concentric arraitgetnent of small houses surrounding a larger Douse revealed at the Late Archaic site of Santa Cruz Bend QvIabry 1997) continued into the Early Formative period in all regions, but. the pattern was found at the Early Formative period Convento site in Chihuahua (DiPeso et at. 1974). At the Houghton Road site in the Tucson Basin, there was a suggestion of a concentric -ring of small houses surrounding a large house, but tie excavation area was united by a road tight -of -way (Ciolek-Torrello 1995). .Contempo- raneous sites in the Ivlogollon region were generally characterized as having a haphazard arrangement of houses (see Ciolck-Torrello 1998b for a review of Early Formative period settlement arrangements). The Late Archaic period mortuary customs continued into the Early Formative period. Flexed and semi -flexed inhumation remained the buriat method of choice, with cremation burials still the less popular custom (Ciolek-Torrello 1998b:248, 249; Mabry 1998c:Table 16.3). Cremation practices included secondary pit cremation (Wocherl and Clark 1997:269-271) and primary cremation (Ciolek-Torrello 1998b; Henderson and Morgan 1989:68, 69; Mcherl and Clark 1997:271-274). The Early Formative period.lnas been portrayed liege as a time during'which the trends that began in the .Late Archaic period continued essentially utwnterrupted by outside influence. In the early part of this period, a broad cultural horizon is recognizable, one that DiPeso (1956, 1979) labeled tine Ololam and Woodson and others (Woodson 1999:67) have recently tenned the Soulbenn Mogollon. %-whatever the label, the .evidence is clear that the people occupying settlement clusters along the basins and river valleys shared sinilar technologies Survey ofRX Acres at TangerIne Road and La Canada Drive, Oro Ynlley, Arizona and cultural practices. Regional interaction was still at a scale that allowed for the rapid spread of new technologies and information, but the diversity of the landscape seems to have helped shape a variety of adaptive .solutions. These diverse adaptive solutions cvenhially led to the emergenceof distinctive cultural traditions. Populations probably continued to grow, settlements became more permanent, and reliance on agriculture increased. All of these trends led to the continued develop- ment of economically independent and politically autonomous groups who established donniniion over territories focused on the river valleys and basins. whereas the movement of goods and people within local settlement systems may still have been common, interactions on a regional scale seem to have decreased. This is seen in the reduced quantities of marine shell (particularly of nacreous shell from the Pacific coast of southern California) and obsidian that are found at Early Formative period sites as opposed to Late Archaic period sites. By the end of the period, we see the emergence of the regional cultural traditions that we recognize as the Hohokam, Ivlogollon, and Trinciieras. The Hohokam culture often takes center stage in discussions of the prehistory of southern Arizona. Taking for a moment a Hohokam -centric view of prehistory, it would seem that most of southern Arizona followed fairly similar developmental trajectories. In the middle Gila River valley, however, there began to emerge a unique group of people recognizable as the Pioneer period Hoho- kam. During most of the Early Formative period,. this group seems to have been ino:more influential than any other contemporary group in the 'Tucson Basin or other localities. But this balance rapidly shifted, and the Early Formative period ends with the ascension of the Hohokam as 'a proininent acid influential cultural tradition. This story is more appropriately told in the Middle Formative period. Middle Formative period (A.D.700-1150): Hohokam Ascension and Descenslon Tlie trend toward agriculturally dependent, sedentary societies was essentially complete across most of southern Acizooa by the Middle Formative period. Settlements were located in two general zones: along the rivers and along the mountain fronts. Agricultural products were clearly the mainstay of the subsistence economy —principally the triumvirate of maize, beans, and squash —but A4iller Rauch rx) 15 foraging of native foods and hunting .of small and large mammals remained an important aspect of the subsistence regime. Despite similarities, local and regional variations in subsistence economies still existed. The repertoire of food -producing and food - gathering techniques was sufficiently diverse, find the level of social organization sufficiently well developed, -to allow groups to adapt to a variety of environments and to cope with .the inevitable. The defining theme of the Middle Formative period is the rise and fall of the Hohokam as a regionally influential force. Sometime during the Early Formative period, along the middle Gila River; between .its confluence with the Salt River and the modern town of Florence, Arizona, there emerged a group of "pioneers" whose de.sceiidants would come to exert a considerable influence over inuch of southern Arizona. To some extent, lesser or greater, the Hohokam culture would touch the lives of peoples across most of the Greater Southwest, including -portions of northern Mexico. The Nliddle Formativeperiod corresponds generally to DiPeso's (1956, 1979) Hohokam Intrusion period for southern Arizona and to the late Pioneer, Colonial, and Sedentary periods of the Hohokam chronology (Gladwhn et at. 1937; Hamy 1.976). This period can be divided into two parts, although these do not necessarily correlate with the archaeological phases defined for the local cultural sequences. The first part of the lyliddle Formative period is characterized by the emergence and spread of the Hohokam as a regionally influential cultural tradition, The initial spread of this tradition occurred during 'the Snaketown phase of the Pioneer period of the Hohokam cultural sequence, spine time between A.D.700 and 800. This expansion was marked by the widespread trade of a red -on -buff pottery decorated in a distinctive hachurcd style. The spread of the Colonial period Hohokain cultural pattern soon followed, whose most notable characteristics included a ball 'court ceremonialism, a cremation death ritual, and. an iconography emphasizing the representation of animal and human forms. Between A.D.800 .and 950, the Hohokam culture ranked supreme over most of southern tlrizona. During this 150-year period, many of the low-lying river valleys along the Gila River and its tributaries were ".colonized" and established as IIohokam settlements. The second part of the. Nfiddle Formative.period is characterized by the inevitable decline of Westland Resources. Inc. En4ha®1nG aWEMtavnoitdCmMfoa6 16 oa A Class ail" CidlinallItroeores Survey for Hohokam influence over southern Arizona. DiPcso (1956, 1979) placed the Hohokam descension at the beginning of the. Hohokam Classic period, which is currently dated to A.D. 1150. The descension .of Hohokam authority, however, began either and was .not necessarily coeval across the entire region. This descension was relatively short-lived and was followed by the re-emergence of local autonomous settlement systems. The final part of the Nfiddle Formative (A.D.950-1150), a tune inteiwd equivalent to the Hohokam Sedentary period, was marked by chnnges in material culture, architecture, and settlement patterns. Hohokam is an agrarian culture -defined by a unique set of cultural characteristics. They .occupied the lower Sonoran Desert. and ,grew coin, beans, squash,, and cotton. 'I'he people practiced a variety of agricultural techniques,, but are most famous for the extensive irrigation systems they built along the middle Gila and lower Salt rivers of the Phoenix Basin. They made a .distinctive red -on -buff pottery and a plain ware with a unique micaceous sheen. They lived hi btush-and,cattli 'structures construct- ed in shallow pits, usually arranged in courtyards. They practiced a cremation death ritual that often included the burning and breaking of funeraty offerings. They were artisans who manufactured shell jewelry, turquoise mosaics, slate palettes, pyrite mirrors, clay figurines, and distinctive serrated points. They are also well known for their naturalistic depictions of animals and people hi a variety of media, including pottery, shell, and stone. They practiced ceremonies that involved the use of ball court& and elevated mounds, Many of these characteristics seem to have developed without earlier precedents; suggesting that an infusion of new traits and characteristics had taken place. The spread of the Hohokam culture across central Ind. southern Arizona is .clearly one of die more phenomenal cultural events in prehistory. Archaeologists continue to debate the mechanisms responsible for this expansion. Evidence currently available reveals that although Hohokam cultural traits occur: across a large region, there. is no singular set of traits that appears consistently ui all areas. Hauty (1978) explains this variation as the result of divergence over time from a common origin. Once the IIohokam had migrated outward from the Gila River heartland and colonized the outlying valleys of the Gila and Salt river tributaries, die local cultures began to diverge from one another. At the time this explanation was offered, there was no strong archaeological evidence to indicate that these areas were occupied prior to the establishment of the Hohokatn settlements.'We now know that these locations had already been settled by foraging and- fartiung peoples for more than a millennium. This new knowledge.leads to a .different explanation of the variations in the Hohokam cultural expression across southern Arizona. The IIohokam culture ,area covers most of southern and central Arizona. Conventionally, this area of influence is perceived :as -a cultural core with periplicries. The core area is the only place with the complete .complement of Hohokam cultural traits. The explanation has been offered that the Holiolcam culture was composed of a network of interconnected and interrelated settlement systems. Thecurrent archaeological evidence indicates that the various settlement systems that comprise the Hohokam regional system developed in place over a millennium or more prior to the emergence of a distinct Hohokatn culture. Whitdesey (1998) reviewed the concept of the Hohokam as a cultural core in the Phoenix Basin surrounded by peripheral regions. After careful consideration of the model, she concluded that it was necessary to "unpack" the Hohokam culture and examine its geographic, religious, economic, ;and social bases. Quite persuasively, Whittlesey emphasized the influence of the structure of tite landscape on the character of interaction among populations in southern Arizona, and suggested that these. interactions were along rivet valleys and tvhthin drainage basins. She stated,. The organizational distinctiveness of riverine systems... suggests that each functioned separately, and that no overarching political orgahizadon existed. Each basin or drainage system thus appears to define an independent settlement system (Whittlesey 1998). Over the past decade or more, most researchers have. attempted to understand t1ic prehistory of southern Arizona in terms of die Hohokam culture as an overarching cultural system. It now appears that studies would fare better by researching the ways in which local settlement systems interacted with one another and expressed their own cultural identity in addition to expressing an affinity with the Hohokam. The culture of each local group -'.vas no doubt shaped by traditions Banded down through Sarmyof37.3Acres at TangerIne Road andLa Ca indaDrive, Oro Valley, Ardzoija preceding generations, as well as by interactions with other peoples living in neighboring regions. The nature 'of these interactions was probably complex and possibly unstable. Associations and Alliances may have formed among various groups that resulted in particular configurations. -of cultural practices and material culture. The emergence of the Hohokam as a regional force ninny have been the result of the restructuring anti realigning of associations and :alliances into a single integrated system. The Hohokam descensioin in southern Arizona may have been the result of the inherent instability of this stricture. This discussion will return to the issue of the spread of the Hohokam culture after considering the origins of the culture. The ,origin of Hohokam society has been .debated for many years. With tine publication of Hobokcmi Desert EaMmis and Crrftsmol, Haury (1976) marshaled -tine opinion that the Hohokam were a group of Mesoamcrican peoples who had migrated to the Gild River sometime in the early centuries A.D. and then spread outward from this heartland into the adjoining river valleys (Doyel 1977; Haury '1976, 1978). On the other hand. is tine view that the Hohokam developed from an in situ late Archaic culture infused with a !lost of cultural factors flowuug. from Mesoamerica (Cable and Doyel 1987; Deaver and .Ciolek-Torrcllo 1995; Feinman 1991; Wallace et al. 1905), Neither of these models alone seems to satisfactorily explain the physical evidence. The migration model may explain the constellation of traits that appears ---apparently rapidly --it the beginning of tine Colonial period, but does not explain the long, continuous cultural record from the Late Archaic period to the Early Formative period. Similarly, the indigenous -origins model effectively explains. the Late Archaic fund Early Formative continuities, but does not explain the rapid appearance of the. constellation of traits at tine beginning of the Colonial period. Attempts to understand the mech. nisms that fostered the spread of the Hohokam culture are complicated by the tendency to look at Hohokam origins as a unifornn process, Researchers have looked for clues in due Gila River valley (Gladwin et al. 19V; Haury 197 ), doe Salt River valley (Cable and.Doye11987; Henderson 1989), and the Tucson Basin (Wallace 2003; Wallace et ;ul,'1995), all with the notion of funding it single explanatory model. Aliller Mauch so 17 Regardless of whether the Hohokam culture developed in place out of the matrix of the lAte Archaic Cocluse culture in the Gila River volley, it is .clear that the Hoholcam cultural pattern and objects signifying Hoholcam identity emanate from this river valley. Hohokam culture is, therefore, clearly intrusive into the so-called peripheral areas of southern Arizona. The culture history of these peripheral areas appears to flow unimpeded from the Late Archaic through the Early Formative periods, only to be abruptly truncated and altered at tine beginning of die Middle Formative period. The primary research theme of the so-called peripheral areas, then, is to study and explain the mechanism responsible for the spread of the Hohokam cultural pattern. Tius mechanisnn probably involved a combina- tion of population movement and diffusion of cultural traits. Haury (1976, '1978) postulated the spread of tine Hohokam as a migration of people from die Gila ntnd Salt river valleys into the outlying Areas. An alternative and more dynamic scenario is offered here, based on the assuinption that at the time the Hohokam culture emerged, the basins and river valleys .of southern 1lrizona were already occupied. At a critical juncture in time, something happened in tine Gila and Salt river valleys that changed the balance of cultural dynamics of southern Arizona. 'That "something' was the second agricultural revolution in southern Arizona, specifically the development of large-scale irrigation agriculture. The first agricultural revolution was the adoption of Agriculture across clue Southwest. By 1200 h.C., early farmers were irrigating in the Tucson Basin and probably elsewhere, These early irrigation systems were rudimentary and best suited to rivers and streams with lesser flows. The second agricultural revolution was the adaptation of irrigation agriculture to tine large rivers of the Gila and Salt. The earliest evidence for irrigation of the floodplains of these rivers is Around A.D..1 (Henderson 1989). This technological innovation probably provided tine necessary impetus for the development of a large sedentary population in the Phoenix Basin (Doyc! 1995:647) and may have, of itself, been enough to give rise to the level of Hohokam culture tint we:see .through the Colonial, Sedentary, and Classic periods. It is of some note that the collapse of the Hohokam cultural system in the fourteenth century has been attributed, in part, Westland Resources, Int. tn2N"w and [rffAmntd C0A 9mJt 18 cza A Clan III Cu f nal Rerources Survey far to a series of droughts and .flood conditions that may Have destroyed the canal Beads beyond repair and re -engineering. What occurred during the Late Pioneer period was not the adoption or adaptation of irrigation technology, but rather the elaboration and intensification of that technology. Continued immigration would have required tile. expansion of existing canal systems or the construction .of new systems to expand the farmlands. The population influx would :Have supplied the labor necessary for these tasks. It is possible that a symbiotic. economic relationship developed between the Gila River population and populations in the outlying areas. Agricultural opportunities existed in the Gila and Salt river valleys, but local labor to expand and maintain the canal networks may have been in short supply. In contrast, .opportunities for large-scale irrigation in the outlying areas were fcw, but potential labor was reasonably abundant. In. exchange for their work, laborers may have carried a share of the harvest, ilia manner similar to practices documented ethnographically for the O'odliam (Castetter and Bell 1942). The initial outflowing of goods in. the eighth century A.A. may have been the result not of population expansion or expanded exchange of Hohokam goods into outlying areas, but rather the result of migrant workers or immigrants returning periodically to their Homes with trinkets, newly acquired skills, and intriguing information about the customs practiced .in tine middle Gila River basin. Peoples who had moved to the Gila River to enjoy tine agricultural bounty could have served as emissaries of the Hohokam culture when they returned to their homelands. Thus introduced, aspects of this culture were selectively incorporated and reinterpreted by indigenous populations to create distinctive local cultural traditions. A scenario such as this could account for tine selective dissemination of Hohokam traditions and material culture to areas outside the Hohokam heartland .(Wilcox 1979; Wilcox and Shenk 1977; Wilcox and Sternberg 1983; Wilcox et al.1981). One reason for the Hohokam ascension in southern Arizona may have been economic. Not only would .the development of large-scale irrigation systems have had a direct impact on t he :amount of subsistence crops that were grown, but oil the cropping of cotton as well. Tile long, warm growing season, abundant water, fertile soils, and physiographic opportunities for large-scale irrigation in the Gila -Salt Bashi were ideal for the cultivation of this valuable commodity. Cotton requires a longer growing season and more water than corn and other subsistence. crops. (about 200 frost -flee .growing days (Teague 1998j). Further, cotton is more tolerant of moderately saline soils than .cocci, beans, or squash (Ayers and. Wescot 1989:31-35, Tables il and 5). Locations that could .support cotton production would have been extremely desirable and economically profitable. Cotton was first documented at Snaketown during the Sweetwater phase (ca. A.A. 600 700), but by the Colonial period (ca. A.A. 800-950), cotton is found in almost all archaeobotanical assemblages from sites along the .Gila, Salt, and Verde rivers. High ubiquity values for cotton suggest that this fiber Plant was being grown in great volumes for textile production and exchange (Adams 1997). Given archaeological evidelncc for its presence in IYteaico as well as on the Colorado Plateau (Teague 1998), it is quite likely that cotton was one of the desert Southwest's major exports. The spread of tlie,Iloliokam cultural pattern .at tine beginning of the Colonial period suggests the development of a large-scale interaction network in southern Arizona. This network was likely superimposed over avenues of interaction that had existed since the Late Archaic period, only intensified. Prior to the emergence of the Hohokam culture, the exchange of exotic goods was relatively low in volume. With the rise of the Hohokam to prominence, goods were exchanged and transported across southern Arizona at all, unprecedented scale. This network was of sufficient vigor that relatively large quantities of Gila River red -on -buff pottery, among other goods, reached populations as far .away as Paloparado (DiPeso 1956), $ome 180 krn to the south. Economic specialization is found in commodi- ties other than cotton during the early part of the Middle Formative period (A.D. 700-950). Although various items were manufactured and exchanged at most residential sites, certain settlements.. apparently specialized in the production .and exchange of particular goods. One of these goods was red -on-. buff pottery, Both casual and careful studies of this ware suggest that the majority of red -on -buff pottery was manufactured in a relatively restricted atea of die middle Gila River valley and exported across southern rlrizona. The volume of pottery exchanged is impressive: At sites in the northern Sr rvcy of37.2Acres at Tnnger1noRoud andLa Callada Drive, Oro Valley, Atakora Tucson Basin, red -on -buff pottery from the Gila River valley accounts for 60 percent of the decorated pottery, or about 15 percent of the total pottery assemblage. Shell jewelry manufacture has been docutnelited at `sites in the Altar Valley of Sonora (McGuire and Villalpondo.C. 1993) and in the lower Santa Cruz River valley of Arizona (lviarmaduke and Martynec 1993). Turquoise jewelry manufacture has been documented at sites in the Tucson Bashi (Bernard -Shaw 1989). Although these sites exhibit intensified evidence of manufacture, the question arises as to what markets were being served. In the later part of the Middle Formative period, the supreme influence of the IIohokam cultural system on populations in southern Arizona began to diminish. This has been documented ih material culture, architecture, and settlement patterns. For example, the export of red -on -buff painted pottery from the Gila River to outlying areas slowed dramatically around ADD. 950 (NUlace 1988; 'Wilcox 1987). In its place, a number of local ceramic series evolved that imperfectly emulated Hohokam Sedentauy-style decorations, but were clearly produced front local clays with a non-Holhokain technology (Deaver 1989b; Greenleaf 1975; Wallace 1986). Across southern Arizona, ball courts were largely abandoned as integrative features of the community by about A.D.1000, and widespread shifts in. settlement location and configuration occurred (Docile et al. 1987; Ferg et al.1984). These changes of the post-A.D. 950 period are sufficiently dramatic to suggest that the populations of southern Arizona were once again functioning as independent political and economic systems by the middle of the tenth century A.D. Aware of these changes, DiPeso (1956) proposed.a period wheie the ancestrally indigenous peoples of southern Arizona reasserted: their independence and returned to their own cultural traditions. Rather than interpreting these events as the result of .;_ orebellion that restored the ancient order, an alternative explanation is :that 'in the absence .of a vigorous economic exchange system, the populations of southern Arizona reverted to an interaction network that had existed slice Late Archaic times: While it is true that certain Hohokam customs persisted .after A.D: 950 (e,g., the practice of cremation), rather than viewing these practices as a continued Hohokam influence, it may be that the practices had become .so integrated in the local Miller Rauch M 19 .customs that there simply was no other way. Life in southern Arizona after A.A. 950 was not the same as it had been before A.D.700. The IIohokatn presence had irrevocably altered the .indigenous cultural traditions. Late Formative (A.D.1150-1450): A New Direction of Change After the decline of Hohokam influence across southern Arizona, another series of sweeping regional changes occurred. In southern and central Arizona, these changes signaled the advent of the Late Formative period, a time of distinctive forms of architecture and settlement, styles of painted pottery, and patterns of interaction. Influence was no longer peddled from the 1-Iohokam core area; instead, it now flowed from northeas t. to. southwest. Thus was a tune of migration, with peoples from the Kayenta region of the Colorado Plateau .moving southward into east -central Arizona (Woodson 1999, 2006). It was also a time when Paquime (Casas. Grandes) in Chihuahua, Mexico, emerged as a center of regional influence (DiPeso et al. 1974). Numerous local centers developed, too, probably as part of a natural reorganization of people in response to the vacuum left by the Gila River Hohokam. Local systems flourished at the expense of regional systems, and within localities, districts were abandoned and new communities, and community centers established. Influential local systems included northern Mexico, the muddle and lower San Pedro river valleys, die Papagueria, and the Tucson Bashi. These new .sociopolitical and economic relationships can be. inferred ,from the pattern of indigenous and exotic ceramics in archaeological assemblages. In the Tucson Bashi, for example, Tanque Verde Red -on -brown was produced with a vigor not reflected by its Gila Basin countcrpata, Casa Grande Red -on -buff; Similarly, in the Safford region, San Carlos Red -on -brown (a stylistic homologue of Tanque Verde Red-on- browri) was also produced with a vigor unmatched in the Gila Basin. In addition, the influx of pottery from the San Pedro 'River valley, the Tonto Basin, and the Cihola region (Wallace and . Holmlund 1984.176, 177) suggests that a more sustained interaction with peoples to the southeast and northeast was taking place. Eventually, a new style of pottery, the so-called Srrlarlo pojthmwes, emerges in east -central Arizona and eventually spreads over most .of central and southeastern Arizona. Westland Resources, Inc. EnpYueNq and Em'vamenideonwltanh 20 cQ fl Class III Cullund Resoates Survey fa - The beginning of the Late Formative period is. signaled by the appearance and rapid spread of a new architectural style. conaistung of aboveground rectangular rooms formed by one of several coin- stiuction methods, Among other techniques, walls were built with adobe "turtlebacks" (i.e., puddled adobe tnasses), adobe reinforced by wooden posts or cobbles, or diy-laid masonry. Initially, above- ground rooms coexisted with the old-style b>ush- and-earth:walled pit structures characteristic of the. Middle Formative period. But by A.D. 1200, above- ground architecture was the dominant form of dwelling and storage space. Geographic variations in construction techniques suggest that architectural styles were developing at the local level. Changes in settlement structure soon followed, particularly the concept of enclosing space with walls to create private compounds. The effect was to partition space and formalize the relationship between the compounds :and other important features within the larger settlement, such -as cemeteries, :middens, and public buildings. Some researchers have suggested that the practice of formally delimiting space was it response to the aggregation of formerly dispersed populations into fewer, but larger, settlements, a phenomenon that appears to have occurred in numerous Places across the Southwest. Wilcox (1987) has suggested that this aggregation was a response to threats of attack. Near the end. of the Late Formative. period, sometitne after A.D.1300, a strong network of regional exchange re-emerges, and goods ace once again traveling over long distances and in large quantities. Thus network is evidenced by the wide- spread occurrence of Gila Polychrome ceramics and obsidian. Over much of central, eastern, .and southern Aiizbna, anew cultural -pattern emerged. This pattern, .like that of .the. preceding Hohokam, .was manifested differently across tine region, suggesting once again that the culture emerged through a realigninetit. of alliances among autono- mous settlement systems. This new cultural tradi- tion was tine Salado culture, one of the most poorly understoodcultures in the region. The Salado culture is discussed here as an example of the trends that characterized the Late Formative period. To understand tine Salado culture in terms: of its influence across southern Arizona, it is first useful to consider die evolution of the concept as formulated by archaeologists. The Salado culture was an attempt :to explain the source of puebloan cultural characteristics at late prehistoric sites in the Hohokam culture area. Current archaeological theory places the source of these cultural changes in the Tonto Basin. The Salado culture is identified by a unique polychrome pottery, one with a dark, ,red - slipped exterior with black -on -white designs on the interior. Three chronologically sequential types are recognized: Pinto, Gila Polychromes, and Tonto. Technically, these three polychromes are part of tine Roosevelt Red .ware tradition, but they are often referred to collectively as the Salado pq�cb»7»�ec Although this affectation is technically incorrect, it aptly connotes -the cultural expression that is identified by the occurrence of this pottery and will be used accordingly in this text. Reid and Vtlhittlesey (1997) summarize the archaeological history of the Salado culture as follows. In die 1920s, archaeologists like Harold Gladwin and Erich SclurAdt attempted to define and explain the Salado culture. A common approach to explaining archaeological change at the time was to rely on the. idea of m&atlou, that is, the physical movement of a population group into a given area and tine superimposing of its cultural traits on any groups already living there. Gladwin, for example, concluded that the presence of polychrome ceramics gat Casa Grande .near present- day Coolidge indicated 1n invasion of peoples into this previously Hohokam -dominated site (Reid and Whittlescy 1997:235). Similarly, it was held that the Salado were a pueblo -dwelling people from .the north who expanded into the 'Tonto Basin, and whose lifeWays and worldviews were imposed upon or adopted by the Hohokam people already living there. Florence Hawley (as well as Gladwin) hypothesized that this migration originated from two areas: the upper Gila region and, later, the Little Colorado River area. Emil Haury presented a somewhat modified version of tine migration Model, concluding that the Salado peoples did not "invade" the IIohokam territories so much as coexist in the same geographic region (Reid and Whittlesey 1997:2382 239). In the intervening years, the migration model was recognized as overly simplistic, and archaeo- logists began to re-evaluate the "migrating puebloan people" model. Rather than the Salado .culture being - "brought hi" 'from the Colorado Plateau, it was proposed that It had. instead developed in place among the local Hohokam populations of the lower Salt River and Tonto Basin. The mechanism for this Survey of372Acres at Tangerine Road andLa Caffada Drive, Oro Valley, Arizona change could have had, at least in part, to do with changing sociopolitical realities among the Hohokam, namely, a trend toward more centralized polities, or "chiefdoms," and away from relatively more egalitarian groups or segmented social groupings. Both concepts derive from the model of social "evolution" that was popular during the 1960s and 1970s. By the 1980s, this perception of the Salado culture was widely accepted, and Salado was not seen as a unique cultural tradition, but rattier .one of the many regional offshoots of the Classic period Hohokam culture. Some scholars, however, did not accept the in -place development of the Salado culture or the model of increased social complexity :as a mecha- nism for such a change. First, the appearance of the Salado cultu a was too "sudden' ; that is, it appeared too abruptly in the archaeological record with.little or no indication of intervening stages -of develop- ment. Second, although Hohokam populations had certainly been present in the Tonto Basin, Mogollon sites were present as well. Recent speculation on the Salado has led to a reconsideration of the migration model (Clark 1995; Elson et al. 2000:175; Rice 1998; Stark et al. 1995; WAttlesey and Ciolek-Torrello 1992; Woodson `1999, 2006). The Salado culture manifests an identifiable identity during the: Roosevelt phase (ca, A.D. 1250- 1350) in the Tonto Basin. Large permanent villages of aboveground, coursed masonry architecture begin to be built, a some­%glnat radical break from the senu-sedentary dry farming/Inuntiug-atnd-gathering lifeway that had begun during the Sedentary period, At least in the upper areas of the Tonto Basin. It was. Also during this time that platform mounds appeared without prototypes, .constructed over a brief period beginning around A.D.1.280 (Wood 2000:113). Though the people in the Tonto Basin had previously established ties with the people living Above the Mogollon Rim, as evidenced by the influx of CibOla White Ware ceramics, it appears that during the Roosevelt: phase, A migration (as opposed to mere interaction) of puebloan people from the Colorado Piateau had begun. The plateau was undergoing a process of abandonment due to a serious, widespread drought beginning .around A.D. 1275. This migration is reflected in the embel- lishment of some existing residendll compounds with distinctive puebloan-style architecture and an expansion to full village settlement. Millet-Mweb E0 21 This newly developed village structure consisted of several residential compounds loosely focused on a platform mound surrounded by a compound wall (Reid and Mittlesey 1997:251, 252). It -is thought that this arrangement reflects the change in polity that became necessary ns a result of the population .increase and the attendant interaction betweetn culturally diverse groups, especially where arable laud was at a premium. Regardless .of the ties that may have been established through trade and possibly kinship with the puebloan people, the demographic shift resulting from. the drought of the late thirteenth century brought both economic and social stress, and probably conflict, to the Tonto Basin. The platform mounds may have served as consolidating points for the cosmopolitan human presence in the villages through the rituals that were associated with them (Elson et al. 2000:182-185) and tine cooperative (and presumably administrative) efforts to build and maintain them. It is also evident that other aspects of spiritual life began to undergo change, including mortuary practices. Extended inhumations, rather then the secondary cremations customary among the Hohokam, became the dominant mortuary practice. Additionally, despite the increasing presence of architecture executed in tine pueblo style, both kivas and great Uvas are conspicuously absent from the villages. This suggests that die Katsina cult was not brought to the Tonto Basin by tile- puebloan immigrants (Reid 'and NVhitdcacy 1907:256, 257),. possibly because this rain -based cult had failed .them on the Colorado Plateau. During the Roosevelt phase, the hallmark polychrome ceramics of the Salado began to be manufactured. These polychtonnes are essentially Roosevelt Red Wares executed in the Pinedale style, an approach to cetaniic design and motif execution that originated with artisans on the Colorado Plateau. This design. style also appears on Cibola White NAres (Zedeno 1994:80), which Roosevelt (and White Mountain) Red Wares replaced. (Reid ct al. 1992:212). Some -scholars have postulated that the Pinedale style in general and the iconography of the Salado design styles in particular (such as the mask and parrot designs found on Gila Polychrome) are indicative of a "regional cult" that was widespread throughout the Southwest .at the time and which developed in response to true environmental and social changes of the Classic. period (Simon and Jacobs 2000:199, 200). In purely �" ,: WestLand Resources. Inc. tngkmftoWfrWWNr tacauwlordr 22 cQ A Class III Cnllurrrl Rerourcer Sinvey for• functional terms, regional cults allow dissimilar social groups to share a common ground, thereby lessening social stresses. Ceramic vessels can identify their users as participants in the symbolic system or cult that is being expressed through the design of the vessel. That this regional belief system —as reflected in the ceramics —vas imported into the Tonto Basin area is perhaps shown by the similarity of Fourmile Polychrome (a red ware made on the Plateau) and Gila Polychrome, while at the same time, the extent of the cult beyond the Salado heartland is indicated by the presence of the polychrome wares at sites far distant from the basin. Efforts to unify the strands of cultural diversity in the.Tonto Basin during tine Roosevelt phase did not .last long. The villages and platform mounds constricted during this. phase were abandoned and burned (possibly as part of a ritual process), and much of tJe populace _aggregated into fewer but much larger settlements with defensive characteris- tics Orson ct at. 2000:186, 181). This aggregation occurs during the Gila phase (A.D.1350.-1400). Destructive flooding during the years A.D. 1380 and 1385, followed by equally disastrous years of drought from A.D. 1385 to 1390, may have forced the complete abandonment of the Tonto Basin, bringing to an end the distinctive cultures and lifeways practiced there for many hundreds of years. This abandonment may have led the people to dispersed settlements along the Gila and San Pedro rivers. Salado sites are lanown from these regions, but their temporal associations are. as yet uncertain (Reid and Whlttlesey 1997:257). In summary, it is evident that late in prehistory a new way oflife that had many of the physical manifestations of puebloan culture appeared across most of southern Arizona. The mechanisms that promoted the spread of this culture appear to have involved the southerly .and southwesterly migrations of puebloan peoples from the southern margins of the Colorado Plateau and the adoption of puebloaa- like cultural traits by the indigenous populations. The iinteiacdonn between the immigrants and the indigenous peoples may not have always been amicable, and warfare was probably common. PROTOHISTORIC PERIOD (A.D.1450-1691) The Protohistoric period —an obscure era in the history .of the Southwest —falls between the Late Formative period and die arrival of the Spanish missionaries, This period is not well represented in, the orcliaeological record, so that the following discussion is based on historical accounts by newly arriving Europeans, linguistic relationships among indigenous peoples, and native oral traditions. Spanish exploration of the Southwest began as early as 1539 with the preliminary scouting expedition of Fray Marcos de Nizn, who had been sent to tlnc .region by Mexican viceroy Antonio de Mendoza in response to .the accounts of Alvar Nunez Cabeza de Vaca and Moroccan. slave Estevan. Cabeza de Vaca and Estevan had wandered to Sonora after being shipwrecked in the Gulf of Mexico in 1528. After de Niza returned, Viceroy Mendoza proposed a larger expedition and selected Vasquez de Coronado as its leader. Coronado's party departed in 1540 in search of the fabled Seven Cities of Ciboln. The route of the expedition probably took Coronado through what is now eastern Arizona, although it. -vas once speculated that one of the stops on the journey, Chichilticale or "Red House," was .in fact the f Ioliokam adobe house at Casa Grande. A preliminary scouting party led by Melchior Diaz preceded Coronado up the San Pedro River and explored the. area around the Gila=San Pedro confluence to the "cast and west:'The exact extent of this survey is unknown (Wilson 1990:25, 26). The Spanish likely entered a world that had undergone traumatic social and environmental changes shortly before their arrival, When the Spanish arrived in the sixteenth century, much of the Southwest was subject to regular warfare. As a result, large areas were uninhabited. Captain Hernando die tllargon, who was transporting supplies up the .Colorado River for the Coronado expedition, -vas told by a native informant that the region between the Colorado River and Coronado's route was uninhabited (Wilson 1999:13). Similarly, Coronado found the region that is now eastern Arizona to be a ,great dssJebIa4o--in uninhabited region (Reid and Wiittlesey 1997:165). Indeed, eastern Arizona had been minimally inhabited following the final abandonment of the pueblos, The precise route. taken by tine Coronado expedition is not known, but several routes have been hypothesized. The most commonly (and perhaps uncritically) accepted is that of Coronado biographer Herbert Bolton (Reid and Wi1ttlesey 1997:267-273), who proposed that the expedition crossed the Gila River near Bylas, continued Survey o f37.ZAcres at Tangerbla Road and Lit Caflnda Drive, Oro Palley, Arizona northward across the Salt,. White, and Little Colorado rivers, and finally arrived at Cibola—the Zuni village of Hawikuh—where the expedition's members were disappointed to find that the streets were not paved with gold as expected. Around A.D.1500, bands of Athabaskan- speaking_groups with a linguistic affinity to native peoples in Alaska, Canada, and northern California began arriving in the region of the southern Colorado Plateau and the mountainous area below tile Mogollon Rhn (Stein 1994.10, 11; VVlnittlesey 2003:243). The exact route and timing .of taus Atliabaskan migration into the Southwest has not been fully resolved, but most scholars agree that it occurred late in prehistory (Mittlesey 2003). Soon after their arrival in the Southwest, the Navajo Ind Apache separated into distinct cultural groups (Whittlesey 2003:243), with the Apache settling in the mountainous regions of the greater Southwest and the Navajo settling around the Four Corners area. The Apache moved into the upland areas that had apparently been unpopulated since the exit of the Ivlogollon, Salado, and Hohokam cultures. from the Mountain Transition Zone late hi prehistory OlMittlesey 2003:242). There are six major Apache tribes: the Jicarilla, Lipan, Mascalero, Chiricahua,. Kiowa-Apache, and Western Apache (Goodwin and Basso 1971:12). The territory of the Apache was ecologically varied, with high mountain peaks, desert areas, and lush riven: valleys. Each Apache tribe practiced a hunting - and -gathering subsistence strategy supplemented by limited horticulture. Wild plant foods collected 'nit the upland areas included acorns from the Emory oak, juniper berries, and the hearts of agaves,. and wild game included deer, antelope, bighorn sheep, wild fowl, and rodents (Goodwin 1942). According to Goodwin (MT61), agricultural products made up only 25 percent of the Western Apache diet, the remainder'being a combination of undomesticated plants,. game animals, and stolen livestock. The Cluricahua Apache relied even less on agricultural products. Raiding activities constituted -an important part of the Apache culture (Goodwin and Basso 1971), and they would periodically raid Mexican, Anglo, Puna, Miricopa, Navajo, and Papago settlements (Goodwin and Basso 1971). Raiding (literally: "to search out enemy property) differed from warfare (literally: "to take death from an enemy") in Apache society (Goodwin and Basso 1071:16). The intent of Miller Ranch r4) 23 raiding was not the total destruction of a community, but rather to steal material goods and leave the community intact for the next raid. Because of Apache dependence on raiding as a subsistence strategy, conflicts between Apache groups and native. agricultural peoples and Europeans would continue throughout the Spanish, Mexican, and American periods until the ultimate suppression of Apache raiding by the U.S. Army in the 1870s. The Apache conflict in the region would end for good in the late 1880s when the Chhricahua Apache surrendered to the U.S..Army, The languages spoken by indigenous peoples were one of the ways the Spanish explorers and nnissionaries used to identify .the groups of people living in southern Arizona and northern Sonora. Some of these people spoke closely related dialects of Phiian (which belongs to the Uto-Aztecan linguistic family), while others spoke Hokan (or Yuman) languages (which are unrelated to Uto- Aztecan). The Hokan speakers were primarily those inhabiting the areas along the lower Colorado River, but some resided alongside. the Piman speakers oil the Gila River, having migrated there in response to ongoing warfare (Reid and Whittlesey 1997:114). The Hokan speakers included, along the Gila, the Opas (much later known as the Maricopas) and die Kaveltcadom (or Cocomaricopas). The Pimaii speakers included such groups as the Sobaipuris, Cipias (or 'Zipia4), Ymiris (or I-Iymeris), and Kohatks (Wilson 1999:10). Linguistically, these is a continuity bet)vicen wesi- central Mexico and southern Arizona, a continuity that may have existed prehistorically and been paralleled by some aspects of the iaterial culture, notably ball courts (Kelley 1991). The languages or dialects spoked by both the Upper and Lower Pimatis belong to Lowland Piiiia, one of four divisions of the Tepunan group of languages (itself belonging to -tile wider Uto-Aztecan family), the other three being Mountain Pima, Northern Tepehuan, a*nd Southern Tepehuan (Saxton and Saxton 1973:xvii). The'I'epehuan languages occur in the Zacatecas and Durango regions in west -central Mexico, whereas the Piman Ianguages occur in northwest Sonora/southern Arizona. This linguistic homogeneity, although quite possibly existing in prehistoric times, does not necessarily reflect a long, in -piece population, although several linguists have concluded that the Uto-Aztecan family has been present in die Southwest since the Middle Archaic WeitUrid Resources, Inc, tnQk*WDg and rd6*MM C&&ftAG 24 (Q A Class III Clillinal Resomres Slavey for period (Mabry 1998a:85). A second scenario that accounts for the distribution of Tepiman languages in southern 1lrhzona is that Piman speakers moved northward from homelands in northern Mexico (Teague 1993:437), presumably replacing the extant language or languages, which may themselves have belonged to the Tepiman group. Although the Piman groups probably had distinct social (or at least political) identities, they were closely related linguistically, a fact that did not go unnoticed by the Spanish. As early as 1540, •the first. official Spanish expedition led by Vasquez de Coronado recorded people speaking dialects of `the same language (Piman) over a large. geographic region, from Sonora to southern Arizona (Wilson 1999:12). Eventually, the Spanish recognized a variety of linguistic groups across northern Mexico and the Southwest, including those belonging to the Uto-Aztecnn family, such as the Opatas of n aorth- central Sonora .,and the Mayo and Yaqui tribes (Spicer 1962:12,13). 'I'lne fundamental question facing archaeologists is whether the Piman-speaking peoples (such as the Sobaipuri of the San Pedro River valley) encountered by the Spanish were descendants of 'the prehistoric peoples of the Late Formative period, or had they .arrived from elsewhere prior to European contact? There are two possible auswers to this question. One is that the. Pinnan-speaking people living in southern Arizona were simply the direct descendants of the prehistoric peoples whose numbers and culture were reduced by the social ,and economic changes that marked the end of the Formative period. The other is that the Piman- speaking peoples moved innto the area after the collapse of the prehistoric cultural traditions. They may have not found the region completely abandoned and perhaps were integrated with the descendants of the prehistoric cultures, a possibility suggested by oral tradition (Teague 1993:444). The possibility of direct descent of the Piman speakers is suggested by the descriptive accounts of the Spanish. as they moved northwest from central Mexico into what is now Sonora and Arizona. They found that the majority of people across this region practiced :ngricultule as a subsistence base, in contrast to people in the surrounding regions of Cali fornia and tile. Great Basin, where hunting and foraging prevailed. The Spanish also noted little to no ,political unity beyond the level of individual and autonomous ninebeifiu, a condition tuilike that encountered in Aztec -dominated central Mexico. Finally, trade across the region, although sporadic and not regularized, was widespread and generally did not involve food and tools, but rather emphasized luxury and .ceremonial items (Spicer 19b2:8-15). All of these traits might be expected at the time of European contact, agriculture and trade having long been the norm .and the )anclivias perhaps the result :of the social reorganization that occurred at the end of the Formative period. In contrast, archaeologists have pointed out dissimilarities in. the material culture between the Piman peoples and the prehistoric cultural traditions, which is supportive of the new cultural identity model. Teague (1993) suggests that both linguistics atld Piman oral traditions support this discontinuity. This continuity exists among people speaking variants of the Tepiman language group. The languages spoken by some of true people in Sonora and southern Arizona belong to Piman, one of the members of the Tepiman.group. The oral traditions of the Piman people in southern Arizona are consistent with both the archaeological record and the. th.guistic model described above. The traditions focus 'on the conflict between Elder Brother, 7'iloi; die hero of the Tohono O'.odhanl and the (Hohokam) Sivanyi or shvanl. In one version of the story, shvend is a personal name (Saxton and :Saxton 1973:147-168), but the word siyauyi is also a reference to a Hohokam priesthood. The traditions state that warfare broke out between Silvana and 171d and his followers,. whom (depending on the account) he gathered together from among the O'odham people of northern Sonora, or wvho emerged from beneath the earth from a point south of Baboquivari. There are rather detailed accounts of the progression of the subsequent war against the Sivairyi and the eventual victory of 171ai'r warriors. Following the conflict and the disposal of the Sivaui priesthood, the warriors dispersed, some retuning south to the lower Piman homclnnd, some going north to the pueblos, but some remaining in the Gila Valley and intermarrying into the local (Hohokam) .population, eventually to become the Pumas .Gileflos (Teague 1993:.444). From 'the foregoing, .it appears plausible that these traditions telling of a rebellion -against a priestly hegemony at the end of the Classic period echo events that are also . reflected in the archaeological record. Survey oP37 2Acres at Tangcrfue Road and La Cafinda Drive, Oro Vn11ey, Arizona HISTORIC PERIOD (A.D.1691-1950) The Historic period begins in 1691 with the establishment of the mission system following the arrival of Jesuit missionary 'Eusebio Kino, Kino made his first forays into the Santa Cruz River valley in '1691 (to Tumadicori) and 1692 (to San Xavier del Bac) (Wilson 1999:12, 13). After a poorly documented visit to tlne Casa Grande area in 1694, Kino trade a second enhudei to the area in 1697 6Vilson 1999:24). Setting out ftom the Nuestra S6ilom de Dolores mission, Kino traveled north along the San Pedro River, followed the Gila River to the west, and arrived at Casa Grande on November 18. On this journey, he was acconnpa- nied by Captain Juan Mateo Matije :and some 20 soldiers and native guides. Manje, unlike Kino, kept well,vrhtten journals of his travels. The chronicle of this expedition makes note of small groups of people living along the San Pedro River, which lie identified as the Sobaipuri (Docile and Wallace 1990; Masse 1981). It also mentions many abandon- ed villages along the river corridox. These were most likely recently abandoned Sobaipuri villages, although he may have included prehistoric sites as well (Masse 1980). The chronicle also notes ".six or seven" 11iman rauchofas along the Gila River in. die area around Casa Grande. This appears to be the first known reference to the Pima by Europeans (Debowski et a1.1976:30). Subsequent tnissionizing efforts identified the groups of people inhabiting southern Arizona and notthern Sonora as the Upper and Lower Pimans, or Pinnas Altos and Pimas Bajos. The Pumas Altos, or the people inhabiting the Pimerfa Alta, were divided by die Spanish missionaries. into four broad groups: the Pimas, inhabiting the southeastern portion of the Pimerfa Alta; the Papabotas, inln;ibiting the desert areas and later known as the Papagos (and today as the 'I'ohono O'odham); the Sobas, supposed followers of a. man named Soba in the southwestern Pimerfa Alta (and unlikely a distinct cultural entity); acid die Sobaipuris, inhabitants of the nordn and northeastern areas, or the San Pedro and Santa Cruz river valleys (Spicer 1962:119, 126-128; Wilsotl 1999:20). Subsistence strategies included die gaftrinng of native resources (with wild melons and bighorn sheep being particularly important sources of food) and floodwater farming. It is uncertain if irrigated agriculture was being practiced at this time (as it had bean during the Hohokam era), although a 1699 Millar• Rrnich rva) 25 account by Captain Manje states that the Phnas "did not use the canals to irrigate their crops, but relied on floodwater .instead (Wilson 199938), However, people in the San Pedro River valley are mentioned obliquely by Kino during an earlier visit as .cultivating cotton by irrigated agriculture. Two of the better known Sobaipuri sites, Quibari and Gaybanipitea, are located in the_ San Pedro River valley. Although only briefly occupied, (from 1692 to 1698), Quibari was the largest setdement along the San Pedro River at this time, with about 500 occupants at its peak (Altschul and Jones 1990). The two sites were excavated by Charles Di Peso, and European metal and ,glass were recovered from both of them. In addition,. Sobaipuri Winetstone. Plain Ware was recovered from Gaybanipitea. Other artifacts of tine Sobaipuri material .culture that were recovered included small serrated projectile points with deep basal notching and finely flaked unifacial and bifacial tools (Altschul anti Jones 1990, Slaughter 1992:70, 71). OMng to the efforts of Padre Milo, missignizing of the people of the Pi.tncrfa Alta continued into the .early eighteenth century, although after Milo's death in 1711, the mission system in Sonora began to decline, partly die.result of neglect while Spain was distracted by the War of the Spanish Succession (Walker and Bufkin 1979:14). In a 1723 report on the state of the mission system in Sonora, Fray Daniel Januske reported that the native pbpulatioli of the Pimerfa Alta was declining, the result .of poor living conditions at the.tnissions and Apache raiding. The Apache had begun raiding; Piman settletncots just prior to Milo's initial contact (Spicer 1962:234), and the iacrcase in raiding over time iesulted in more and more geographical shifts among the Piman- speaking populace. By 1750, .most of the people occupying the San Pedro River valley had been forced to. trove to the Santa Cruz and Altar valleys. This. turned out to be only a temporary solution, as the Apache began raiding these locations as well. In 1762, the remaining Sobaipuri populations were moved out of the San Pedro River valley to replace Dimas who had succumbed to disease at die Guevavi Mission itn the Satita Cruz River valley. These people either died or were absorbed into the Pima populace, thus ending the existence .of the Sobaipuri as a distinct cultural group (Walker and Bufkin 1979:12). Westland Resources, Inc. f rgYaeMp ad Fm+gnamld Cmnllan I t 26 c�Q f1.Clarr III CuIttind Resoui er Siavey for Incursions by .the Apache continued unabated. Beginning around 1790, as a means of bringing raiding to a halt, the Apache in .Northern New Spain were provided with rations and supplies, in action by the Spanish government that -allowed for the expansion of ranching and stock raising in what would eventually become southern Arizona (Officer 1987). This time of relative peace. ended with the independence of Mexico from Spain in 1821. With Spanish support no longer available, the Apache resumed their raiding activities (IVlorrisey 1950:151) and .ranching once ;►gain became a hazardous profession. Angloamericans first established a substantial presence in the muddle Gila River region during the period between Mexico's independence from Spain in 1821 and the beginning of tlne Mexican -American War :in 1846. The first Americans to enter the area appear to have been Sylvester: and James Ohio Pattie, father and son beaver trappers who. made several trapping excursions along the San Pedro, Gila, and Colorado rivers during the years 1825 and 1826 (Walker and Bufkin 1970:17). During .the war itself, the "Army of the XVcsV' under the command of Colonel Stephen Watts Kearny was assembled at Fort Leavenworth, ILlnsas, for the conquest of the Southwest. The first expedition, headed by Kearny, passed along the Gila River in 1846. Reinforce- ments sent to support this force included the Second Missouri Mounted Trifles and an infantry of 500. This infantry, known as the Mormon Battalion, consisted of volunteer Mormons from Nauvoo, Illinois, who intended to settle in Utah. The first commander of the battalion, .Captain James Allen, died before reaching Santa 'Fe, and Captain Philip St. Gcoige Cooke was promoted to the position. Cooke entered what is now Arizona through the Guadalupe Pass, marched up the San Pedro River to the Benson area, and honed west toward Tucson. Frpm there, he continued up the Santa Cruz River and followed Kearny's. previous route along the Gila River to California. Although tetrtpotary, this is perhaps the first instance of a Mormon presence in the San Pedro valley (Walker and Bufkinn 1979:18). The Treaty of Guadalupe -Hidalgo, signed in 1848 following the conclusion, of the Mexican- Americain War, ceded that portion of (what is now) Arizona lying -north of tlne Gila River to the United States. In 1853, the Gadsden .Purchase expanded Arizona from '.the Gila River south to the present- day.lvle.:ucan border. Although the lands included in the Gadsden Purchase had been used for ranching in the past, Arizona's ranges were now open for ranching activities on a large scale. The increase in California's population after 1849 had resulted in a significant beef muket, and Arizona became a thoroughfare for cattle being driven from Texas to California. Within Arizona Itself, military garrisons, Indian reservations, and a glowing miring industry also provided a need for *beef Qvforrisey 1950:151, 152). The Gadsden Purchase provided territory for the. United States' ever-expanding railroad system. The one obstacle that remained was the continuing conflict b-etween the Apache and Anglo settlers. In 1860, Fort Breckenridge was established along .tile San Pedro River to defend American settlements from Apache raids (Sheridan 1995:61). Fort Breckenridge was abandoned during tine Civil War, though reoccupied and renamed Camp Grant in 1865. In 1866, Camp Wallen was established as. one of a number of temporary military posts in Arizona during the Apache conflicts (Walker and Bufkin 1979:37). In 1863, the Arizona Territory was established after successful lobbying by Charles D. Poston. A year before, in 1862, the National Homestead Act offered land tracts of 160 ac at $1.25. per acre or 80 ac at $2.50 per :acre for land within a railroad grant (Stein 1990.4). This began a series of home- steading acts that spatked a boom in homesteading in Arizona in the 1880s that peaked between 1910 and 1940 (Stein 1990). With the surrender of Geronimo in 1886 (Collins et al. 1993:32) and the end of open hostilities, settlers flocked -to the territory with the aid of tile. railroad. Miring and cattle ranching were the main industries of growth. Arizona became the 48th state in the Union on .February 14,1912. METHODS Prior to fieldwork, WestLand reviewed available cultural resource information for the area of potential effect. Site record files were searched at tine Arizona State Muscum and on the ASM online. database (AZSI'I`E) for information on recorded sites and projects in the APE and within a 1.6-km (1-tm) buffer surrounding the APE. Information was collected for each site located in this area, including site number, site location, age, cultural affiliation, date.secorded, whether or not the site. Survey of37.2Acres at Tangerine Road and La Cofnda Drive, Oro W ley, Atlzona had been scientifically investigated, NRHP status (if knowa), and literature citations affiliated with the recorduig or investigation of the site, Available General Land Office maps and records administered by the Bureau of Land Management were also examined for relevant Historic period information about the APE. The information obtained during the site files search was used to help determine whether there were known prehistoric and historic cultural resources within the APE. Fieldwork consisted of a continuous, intensive, and complete cultural resources inventory of the APE. WestLand's archaeologist walked close - interval parallel transacts 20 in apatt until the area had been thoroughly examined for evidence of prehistoric and historic cultural feaures and artifacts on the ground surface. 'I'opographic. snaps; surveying compasses, global positioning system (GPS) units, and' flagging tape were .used to ensure complete coverage. Arizona State Museum guide- lines. (ASM 1995) were used to determine .whether cultural resources qualified as archaeological sites. These guidelines specify the following minimum criteria for designation as nn archaeological site: 1. Physical remains of past human activity that are at least 50 years old. Additionally, sites should consist of at least one of the following iYldlei-Ranch so 27 2. 30+ artifacts of a single class (i.e., 30 sherds, 30 lithics, 30 tin cans) within an area 15 m'(500 ft) in diameter,except when all pieces appear to originate from a single source (Le., one ceramic pot, one core, one glass bottle). 3. 20+ artifacts -which include at least 2 classes of artifact types (i.e., sherds, groundstone, nails, glass) within an area 15 in (50. ft) in diameter. 4. One or more archaeological features in temporal association with any number of artifacts. S. Two or more temporally associated archaeological features without artifacts, RESULTS SITE FILES SEARCH The search of ASM records identified 21 previously completed projects and seven previously recorded archaeological sites within the area of potential effect and the surrotinding 1.6-lun (1-mi) buffer zone. One previous archaeological project (1987-237.ASIv1) is located partially within the APE {Tsiblel, Figure.3). Of the seven previously recorded sitesidentified within 1.6 lcun (1 mi) of the APE (Table2, Figure 3), none are located within the APE. Table 1. Previously recordsd projects within 1.6 km 1 ml of the area of potential effect Project Number Protect Name Date Company Reference .1979739.ASM TG+E Northern Tucson Transmission 08/22/78 ASM Rozen (1979) Line Survey 1981-174.ASM The Northern Tucson Basin Survey, Not ASMUA Madsen et al. Phase I recorded (1993) _ Proposed Land Development Project for 1983-158.ASNI the Land Department Group, Inc., near 08/23/83 ASMCR&1D Bartlett (1933) 'Tucson — •-� 1984-11.ASIy1 -•'1'angcrinc Road/La Canada Archaeo- 02/84 - PAST �•---•— --- Stephen (1984) logical Explor,14on (PAST job # 83-19 - 1985-134.ASM State Land Survey 12/04/85 ASM i _Rozen (1985) 1986-220.ASM Rancho Vistoso Survey 07/03/86 IFAR Craig and Wallace (1987) __ 12-Mile-Long Segment of'1 angerine Stone and 1987-237.ASM Road .betwecn First Avenue and I-16, in 10/23/87 ARS Bonttager (1087) NE Pima County WestLand Resources, Inc. E0&4G%0r4E1ffJMMMWc0n{ "W1 28 e4A Clara III Gdluml Reroums Survey for Table 1. previously recorded projects within 1.6 km (1 ml) of the area of potential effect Project Number j Pro ectName Date Com an . Reference . 1992-61.ASM Oro Valley _Naranja 06/18/92 IGUANA Scott ('1992a) 1992-69.t1SNl __ Oro Valley/Naranja (II) Not recorded1994-403.r1SM _ IGUANA Scott (1992b) Naranja Section_2 _ _ - - - v 05/23./94 PAST - Steplieti (1994)- 199.5-53.ASM Glover & La Cholla Survey 03/15/95 TIERRA Carpepter (1995) 1996-7.ASM Churcli of dne_Apostles 02/16/96 OPAL Jones (1996 1999-439.ASM Mira Vista Survey 11/23/99 SWCASCT Heilen (1999) t999-453.ASM _Naranja Sec. 2 (ASLD tt 53-102399) 04/11/99 P.r1ST StcplIcn (1999) 1999-596.ASNl Gilbert Road Survey and'I'csting Project 10/19/99 DAMES. - Pratt and Rude _ (2002) 2000-787.ASM La Canada/1'angcruic NEC - - 12/OS/00 -PAST _Ste hcu 2000 2001-250.ASNI Catalina/Avia Valley Surveys Shannon Cell Tower Survey-^ 08/17/01 _07/12/01 07/06/01 DESARC AZTLAN SWCATUS _ Diehl (2001a,. 2001 b, 2001 c) 2001-372.ASM _ SlaNvson (2001) Plummer (2001) 2001-700.ASM 'Tangerine Road BE and Arch Survey 2003-1378.ASNi Two -Parcel CA. 7-Acre.Cultural Resources Survey-- -` 'Iangerine/La .Cholla Intersection 10/13/03 11/02/03 OI'r1C PAST` Jerla and Dart (2003) _ Stephen (2003) 2004-5.ASM _ Table 2. Previously recorded sites within 1.6 km (1 mi) of the area of potential effect Site Number NRHP Status Cultural Affiliation and SIte Type Date Recorded ! 'Reference j Holiokain AZ AA:12:298(ASNI) Not evaluated prehistoric undefined rock.alignment 02/20/96 Jones (1996) and rock.pile AZ AA:12:299(ASh1) Not considered eligible Ilohokam .... .. _... _ .... ; ..... --. -;--. 02/20/96 Jones (1996) prehis toric artifact scatter Hohokam AZ AA:12:43G(ASNI) Not evaluated prehistoric artifact scatter, drill, and 01/10/83 Site card on file projectile point Ilolnoka►n AZ AA:12:725(ASNI) Not evahiated prehistoric lithic scatter, possible Lock 08/26/87 Stephen (1994) structure AZAA:12:779(ASNi) - Not evaluated - -----------•--•-Hohokam ••- am..•............. prehistoric artifact scatter 03/14/95 Swartz.(1995) AZBB:9:295(ASNI) Not evaluated -- n Cu ......Unknowu - -•••nC-ltural Aff'iliatiot>. •••-•- -• ----------•-- rocluingand rock pile 05/23/94 Stepinen(1994) AZBB:9:299(ASM) ----- Not evaluated -- -- •--•••-•�••••..I-IH ol-noio-kaka •m -------•--•----- 03/14/95 Swartz. (1995) rehistoric artifact scatter Survey of 37.2rlctes nt Tangerine Bond andLrt Crtifadrt Drive, Oro Valley, Anions 26 F� )OA t" A.Z 'BB :2 9R(ASM).­' .4A4A:12.'719(AIM) ii V AA'-12:436(ASM) A Id. I 1M • 341 /�.'%J U"I 11 If 109 1Z 2:209(A A.•'I Sm '\A2.',j _4 A981A SM) ;A;A' "I Lt :. X r" he IV 'Vol" 41 T.113.,R.13E. PorUon of $ecllonN, Pima County, Arizona N Oro Valley USGS, 7S Quadrangle 0 1,000 2,000 Feet- 0 Boo 1,0Qo Motors - APE Archaeological Site 1987-237.ASM Figure 3. Previously recorded project within the APE and previously recorded sites within 1.6 kin (I mi) of tho APE 30 m A Carr 7I1 Cullmul Retox-ew Slaey for FIELD SURVEY WestLand's Class III cultural resouuees survey did not identify any archaeological sites or.isolated occurrences in the area of potential effect. This is. likely due to two factors: first, the area has been heavily disturbed by mechanical blading, which may have altered or removed any cultural materials.; second, the APE is located in an upland setting at the divide between two systems of washes. Such locations may have beck exploited only casually or seasonally by an agricultural people such as. the Hohokam, thus exhibiting a very low density of artifacts and features. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS No archaeological sites or isolated occurrences were found during the Class III cultural resources survey of 37.2 ac at the intersection of Tangerine Road and La Caftada Drive. WestLand Resources, Inc., therefore, recommends archaeological. clearance for the area of potential effect. However, in the event that cultural materials .are uncovered during constuliction, construction activities should be immediately halted and not resumed until a qualified archaeologist has assessed the significance of those discoveries. Survey oi'37.2Acres at Tangerine Road and La CaAadu Drive, Oro Valley, Arizotja REFERENCES Adams,. Jenny L. 1998 Ground Stone Artifacts. In Anhaeologica! Investigations of l:auly Village Sites in the Middle Sankt Ci/q Pal/ey, Anal res and Synthesis, edited by Jonathan B. Ivfabry, pp. 357- 422. Anthropological Papers No, 19, Center for Desert Archaeology, Tucson. Adams, Karen R. 1997 Macrobotanical Analysis. In I/anislruq Dive), Landscapes and Lives of the Lower Verde .Valley, The Lower i/erne Airhaeological Pr ject, flobwe 2--A wieldlyral, Sirbsislence, lard Lnunnnznent«l Slredier, edited by Jeffrey A. Homburg and Richard Ciolek-Torre11% pp. 149-178. SRI Press, Tucson. Altschul, Jeffrey H., and Bruce A. Jones 1990 Settlevrent Treadr in The Middle Senn Pedr» Valley: A Cullival Resoanes Sample Swry of the Fort I-luachura Mililay Reservaliou. Technical Series No. 19. Statistical Research, Inc., Tucson, Altschul, Jeffrey H., Rein Vanderpot, Robert A. IIechman, and Cesar A. Quijada 1997 The Periods Between: Archaic and Formative Culture of the Upper and lyliddle Sati Pedro Valley. Paper prepared for the 1997 Amerind Foundation seminar, "The. Archaeology of a Land Between: Regional Dyw=dcs in the Prehistory and History of Southeastern Arizona," Dragoon. Anyon, Roger, Patricia A. Gilman, .and Steven A. LeBlanc 1981 A Reevaluation of the Mogollon-Mimbres Archaeological Sequence. The Gva 46(4)s 209 226. Arizona. State Museum 1995 Revised Site Definition Pohl: Arizona State Museum, University of Arizow,Tucson, Ayers, R, S., and D. W, Wescot 1989 Irlater Qiialiy far Agdealtnrr, Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 29. Food and .Agri- culture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. A il/tr Rand) E0 31 Bartlett, Michael H. '1983 An Arrhaeologiral Clearance Survey of a Prgpored Laud Develop cent Prefect for the Land Development G►nup, .Inc; ,Nero• Taeson, 'ilea Coctnly, Arizona. Arizona State Museum, Tucson. Bernard -Shaw, M. 1989 Arrhaeologleal Invesl&lions at 'flit Recllall Site, AZ.�.(f1: l2:l49 (flS1�I), to tl�e Nortlre�7r T uuon Basin. Technical Report No. 89-8. Center for Desert l%rchaeology,.Tucson. Berry, Michael S. 1982 Tivie, Space, gnd Tirrnsition in AnanrZi Prrbir- loy. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City. Bowen, Thomas 1976 Esque"ma de la Historia do la Cultura •Trinclieras. In Sonora: Antrnpolagla del Derieao, edited by B. Braniff C. and R.S. Felger, pp. 267279. Colecei6n Cicntifica 27, Instituto National de Antropologia a Historia, Culhuacan, Mexico. Brown, D. E. (ed.) 1994 Biotie Col» rnunities: Soulhtvesleni United States and Nod/nvesteni Alexico. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City. Cable, john S., and David E. Doyel 1987 Pioneer Pedod Village Structure and Settlement Pattern in the Phoenix Basin. In The Hobokant T/illegt: Site Straclurr and Organization, edited by David E. Doyel, pp. 21 70. Southwestern and Rocky Mountain Division, American Association for the Ad- vancement of Science, Glenwood Springs. Carlson, David, Jeanne Swarthout, and Stan Freer 1989 Lithic Technology along the All American Pipeline. In Cr/lwal Resouras RepoafortheAll Awedcan Pipeline Pi jeer, pp. 647-678. New Mexico State University, Las Cruces. Carpenter, John 1-1. 1955 An Airbaeological Assersnient e a 40 A679 Pentrlal the South- east .CoWer of the Inteiseclion of Glover Road and La CIl01141 hi Tairon, xhkoua. Tierra Right of Why Services,, Ltd:, Tucson. WestLsnd Resaurces.1nc. EoQhB�Ng ad f m�ronrnen Id COntuYonb 32 CQ A Class III Cullmul Resotaaes Su,.vey for Castetter, Edward F,, and Willis I-1. Bell 1942 1'i im acid Papugo Indian Ag)iwIltar. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque. Ciolek-Torrello, Richard 1995 The I loughton Road Site, the Agaa Cnlicnte Phase, and the Early Formative Period in the Tucson Basin. TheKfva 60(4):531-574. 1998a Sites of the Early Formative Period. In Early 1"atrlrotr of the Sonown Dexed, Archaeological Investigatims at line Holghton Road Site, Timron, ALiZona, edited by Richard Ciolek-Torrello, pp. 229-256. Technical Series No. 72, Statis- tical Research, Inc., Tucson. 1998b Summary and Conclusions. In Early Faivierr of the Sonomn Desert, Atthaeolagicalluverligations at the H&Wvou IWd Site, 7kicso», zlikomt, edited by Richard Ciolek-Torrello, pp. 257— 280. Technical Series No. 72, Statistical Research, Inc., Tucson. C1;uk, Jcffrey 1995 Domestic Arclutecture in the Early Classic Period. In The Roosevelt Corentuuuty Develop»>ent Stu y: New Perspectives m Tonto Basin P1vhislo y, edited by Mark D. Elson, Miriam T. Stark, and David A. Gregory, pp. 251-305. Anthropological Papers No: 15—Center for Desert. Archaeology, Tucson. Collins, William S., Melanie Sturgeon, and Robert Carriker 1993 The. United States Militay in zhitona, 1846- 1945. Arizona SIIPO, Phoenix. Craig, Douglas B., and Henry D. Wallace 1981 Prehistoric Settle»ent in .the Canada del Oto Valley, AtiZona: The Rancho Visloso Survy Pevjea. Anthropological Papers 8. Institute for American Research, Tucson. Deaver, William L. 1989a Cer mics. In Excavations at Hawles Nest (AZ AAA2:484),. A Late Pioneer -Early Colonial Period.Ilohokam Farmstead, Part 1 of Holiokavr.11irhaeology Along Phase B of the Tucson .f ggditct, CcnAnl Ad.Zona Prefect, Vohu»e 4: Small Sites and Specialised Reports, edited by Jon S. Cvaplicki and John C. Ravesloot, pp. 51-62. 1989b Pottery and Other Ceramic Artifacts. In The 1979 1983 Tesibg. at Los Moateins (AZ AA:12:57 .ASM),_ a .Lange Hohokam Tillage Site in the Tuerou 13nfin, by Richard C. Lange and William L. Deaver, pp. 27-82. Archaeological Scries No.177. Arizona State Museum, University of Arizona, Tucson. 1998 The Chronology of the Houghton Road Site and .the Early Formative Period in the Tucson Basin. In Early Fatmea of the Somma Desert, 1hel:aealogi;wl Investigations (it the Elotghlon Road Site, Tucson, -)nova, edited by Richard Ciolek-Torrello, pp. 189 208. Technical Series No. 72, Statistical Research, Inc., Tucson. Deaver, William I-, :and Carla Van West 2001. Introduction. In El Maego: A Petihislide Settlement k the. Upper Santa Oyq River Valley, edited by W Deaver and C. West, pp. 1 26. SRI Technical Series No.74. Statistical Research, Inic., Tucson. Deaver, William, L., and Richard Ciolek-Torrello 1995 Early .Formative Period Chronology for die Tucson Basin. Vie Kioa 60(4):481-530. Debowski, Sharon S., Anique George, Richard. Goddard, and Deborah Mutton 1976 .11n. 11irhaeological Survey of the Ballet loam Resttvobt ASM Archaeological Series No. 93. University of Arizona, Tucson. Diehl, Allison Cohen 2001a Cttltt id Iierotures Survey for a Proposed Utility Installation aloq Slallion Place East of Columbus Bortlevatd, Pima Cottny, Aritona. Project Report No. 01-133. Descn:t Archaeology, Inc., Tucson. 2001b Crdlmal Ilesennys Sinvey for a Pioposed Wilily Installation in the vurtiy of the Tiamfeclion of Mirgoo. Road and Solol.Avenue, Mara Couuly, Arizona. Project Report No. 01-132. Desert Archaeology, Inc., Tucsonn. 2001c Cnllmul Resotnaes Smvy for a Proposed Utiliy Installation in the Vicitti y of the InlarecUon of La Cholla Boalev:nd and Taigerke Iliad, Pima Canny, Atizoua. Project Report No. 01-131. Desert Archaeology, Inc., Tucson. Survey of37.2Acres at Tangerine Mond and La Catfadn Delve, Oro Valley, Arizona Diehl, Michael XV. 1997 Arrhaeological lnvertigaliotrs of tin Eerily Agrrcul- twal Period Settlei:mit ai the Base of,-ii Ablotmtaih, Tucson, Arizona. Technical Report 96-21. Center. for Desert Archaeology, Tucson. 2005 Epilogue: "Fatmagine' During the Early Agricultural Period. In Sttbsislence and Rerotme Use ShWegies.of Emly Agdetdtum! CommunNes in Sonthent AniTona, edited. 'by Michael W. Diehl, pp. 181-184. Anthropological Papers 34. Center for Desert Archaeology Tucson. DiPeso, Charles C. 1956 The Upper Pima of San G�yelano del Tiunacacorr: An Atahasohistodeal Recnnstme on of the O'otam of Rmetia Alta. Publication No. 7. Amerind Foundation, Dragoon. 1979 Prehistory: The O'otam. In. Sott#xest, edited by A. Ortiz, pp. 91-99. Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 9, W.C. Sturtevant, general editor. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. DiPeso, Charles C., John B. Rinaldo, and Gloria J. Fewler 1974 Cara Grrrndes. A Fallen Ttadiug Center of the Ginn Chidill ea, Vol 1-3. Amerind Foundation, Dragoon. Doelle, William H., ,ind Henry D. Wallace. 1990 The 'Transition to history in Pimerfa Alta, In Petrpectives on Sotrihtverletit 1'tehistoy, edited by P. E. Ivluuiis and C. L. Redman,. pp, 239- 257. Westvie-,vPress,.Boulder. Doelle, William H., Frederick Huntington, and IIeuiy WORM 1987 Rincon Phase Reorganization in the Tucson Basin. In Hoho i mti I/i//age: Site Shu ttue and Otganizatiou, edited by David E. Doyel, pp. 7125. Southwestern Rocky Mountain Division of the American Assoc. for the Ad- vancenctit of Science, Glenwood Sptings. Dongoske, Kurt 1993 Burial Population and Mortuary Practices. In Archaic Occtoalton on the SetDta Cruz Flais: 1%e Talw• Hills Anboeglogical Pi jest, edited by Carl Halbirt and T. I{athleen Henderson, pp.173-181. Nottlnland Research, Inc;, Flagstaff. ttililler Raneh M 33 Doyel, David E. 1977 Excenvilions in the h1ieRle Scums Cruz Diver l•/alley, SoutheevIer», Ildtona, Archaeology in Arizona No. 44, Arizona State Museum, University of Arizona, Tucson. 1995 Comments. The Kiva GO(4):6.41—G50. Eddy, Drank W., and Maurice E. Cooley '1983 Cuhtnrd and Boo menterl Histoy of Cienega Tally, Soulbeaslern, fltizoua. Anthropological Papers No. 43. University of Arizona Press, Tucson. Elson, Mark, and Michael Lindeman 1994 The Eagle Ridge Site, AZ V:5:104/1045 (ASM/TNP). In The Roosevelt Cotte j eudy Development Sttn,y: lub-oduaton and Sntall Sites, edited by Mark D. Elson and Deborah L. Swartz, pp. 23-116.. Anthropological Papers No. 13, Vol. 1. Center for Desert Archaeo- logy, Tucson. Elson., Mark D., Miriam T. Stark, and David A. Gregory 2000 Tonto Basin Local Systems: Implications -for Cultural Affiliation and I'Aigration. In Salado, edited by Jeffrey S. Dean. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque. F..zzo, Joseph, and William L Deaver 1998 Data Recovey at the Costello King Sile (i1Z AA:12.503 [ASM]), a I ate Archaic Site in the Northern l ireson Basin. Techtical Series No. 48. Statistical Research, Inc., Tucson. kauglit, Michael K., and Andrea K. L. Freeman 1998 Paleoindian Complexes of the Terminal Wisconsin and Early IIolocene. In Rrleo- indian and Atrbair Sites in Arizona, edited by Jonathan B, .Ivinbty. Tecluucnl Report 97-7. Centet forDesettArchaeology,.Tucson. Feitiman, Gary M. 1991 Hohokam Archaeology in the Eighties: An Outside View. In Bxplotiq the Hohokam: Pirhislorrc Desert Peoples of the Ameman Southivest, edited by G. J. Gumertnan, pp. 461-483. Amerind Foundation New World Studies Series No. 1. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque. WestLand Resources, Ine, rrpiae(NWA(" Y WQ1Cank M1 34 cQ A Class III Cullurul Rerourres Survey for Ferg, Alan, Kenneth C. Rozen, William L. Deaver, Ivlartyn D. Tagg, David A. Phillips, III, and David A. Gregory 1984 HohokaAu Habdation Sites in the Nmtbern Santa Rila iWoirntaius. Arizona State Museum Archaeological Series 147(2). University of Arizona, Tucson. Fish, Paul R., Suzanne K. Fish and John H. Madsen 1990 Sedentism and Settlement Mobility in the T Tucson Basil prior to A.D. 1000. In Perpectiver on Soullimeslera Pmhislog, edited by Paul S. h1innis and Charles L. Redman, .pp; 76-163. Westview Press, Boulder. Fratt, Lee, and Rude, Trisha 2002 fan .11rzlraeological Arresswrlit Survey of 308 Acres in Oro Vally, Atitona. Freeman, Andrea K. L. 1998 Arclxreologiced Invert4gadols at /be Irletlands Site, AZAA:1290 (ASII). Teclinicai Report No. 97-5. Center for Desert Archaeology, Tucson. Gasser; Robert E., and Scott M. Kwiatkowski 1991 Desert as Context: The Hohokam Environ- inent. In Exploring the Hobokam: Pirlihimic Dese»t People of the .11mvican Sortlnvest, edited by G. J. Gumerman, pp. 417-459, Uni- versity of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque. Gilman, Patricia A. 1988 Sedendsm f Mobility, Seasonality, and Tucson Basin Archaeology. In Recent Rareairh on Ttwrm Basin Prebirtag: Prmeedugs of the Second Tncron Basins Conference, edited by William 13. Docile and Paul R. Fish, pp. 411-417. llntluopological Papers No, 10. Institute for American Research, Tucson. 1995 Multiple Dimensions of the Archaic -to -Pit Structure Period Transition in Southeastern Arizona. The Klva 60(4):619-632. Gilman, Patricia A., Valli S. Powell, and Don L. D.ycus 1995 The Role of Agriculture and Residential Movement in the Late Archaic and Early Pit Structure Petiods of Southeastern Arizona. In Eary Fmrnnative Adaplationr in the Soutbew Sowl vest, -edited by Barbara J. Roth. Monographs in World Archaeology No. 5. Prehistory Press, Madison, Wisconsin. Glad -,yin, Harold'S. 1965 Excavations at Snnketown: Material Culture. University of Arizona Press, Tucson. Gladwin, Harold S., Emil W. Iiaury, E. B. Sayles, and Nora Gladwin 1937 F—Y avatiour at Snaketorvn: Alaluial Culture. Mcdallion Papers No.25. Gila Pueblo, Globe. Goodwin, Grenville 1937 The Characteristics and Function of Clan in .t Southern ,Athapascan Culture. In Ammican Airthrnpolo�gisl 39:394-407. 1942 The Social Organization of the Wlesterir Apacbe. The University of Chicago. Press, Chicago. Goodwin, Grenville, and Keith Basso 1971 Westem Apaclie Raidiq and lVa)fair. University of Arizona Press, Tucson. Greenleaf, J. Cameron 1975 E:Ccavatiorrr Art Pturta de Agua..Anduopological Papers No. 26. University of Arizona Press, Tucson. Gregory; David A. 1999 Excavations in the Santa Cmt River FloodplQi» The iWddle Archaic Coapmrent at Los Pozof Anthropological Papers No. 20. Center for Desert Archaeology, Tucson, 2001 Examrrtionr in the Santa Gyrz Diver Flmo lain. The Errrly Agricn1wm1 Period Conponrent at Los Pozos. Anthropological Papers No. 21. Center for Desert Archaeology, Tucson. Gregory, David A. (ed) 1999 Ar-elAaeologySaathrvert 13(1). Center for besert Archaeology, Tucson. Halbirt, Carl D., Kurt E. .Dongoske, and T. Kathleen Ienderson 1993. Coffee Camp: A Late .Archaic Site on the Santa Cruz Flats. In Arrbaic Oicipa#o# of `.the Santa Crrrz Flals: The Talor Hills Airbaeological Protect, edited by Carl D. Halbirt .and T. Kathleen Henderson, pp. 44-114. North- land Research, Inc., Flagstaff. Sruvey of:37.2Acres of Tangerine Road and La Cafioda Drive, Oro Valley, Arizona Hard, Robert J., and John Roney 1998 A Massive Terraced Village Coinplex in Chihuahua, Mexico, 3000 Years Before Present: Science 279:1661-1664. Hard,.Robert J., and WiMani L. Merrill 1992 Mobile Agriculturalists and the Emergence of Sedentism: Perspectives from Northern Mexico. AmieiieanAtithmpologist 94. 01-620. I-Iaury, Emil W. 1036 The Mogollon Cullum of Sonlhmsslern N&V rtilexico. Medallion Papers No.20. Gila Pueblo, Globe. 1957 An Alluvial Site on the San Carlos Indian Reservation, Arizona. American Antigrity 23('1):2--27. 1976 The Hohokam: Desert Em menr and Cti?ftrrmeu. University of Arizona Press, Tucson. 1978 Concluding.Thoughts. Li The Hodges litrim: ll Hohokam Comumrndo in the Tumor Basin, by :Isabel T. Kelly, pp. 126-428. Anthro- pological Papers No. 30. University of Arizona Press, Tucson. 1986a An Alluvial Site on the San Carlos Indian. Resmation, Arizona. Reprinted. In Emil 1C/. Hurry's Ptehirloy of llie Soalbivert, edited by J. Jefferson Reid and David E. Doyel, pp. 1- 133. University of Arizona.Press, Tucson. 1986b Artifacts with blaniunoth Remains,. Naco, tlrizona: Discovery of the Naco Mammoth and the Associated Projectile Points: In Emil IF/ Hailry's.Nehi'sloy of the Amnri an S'outbmert, pp.78-98. University of Arizona Press, Tucson. Hayden, Julian D. 1967 A 'Summary Prehistory and History of the Sierra Pinacate, Sonora. +weih-an flnliquily 32(3)335 344. 1970 Of Hohokam Origins and Other Matters. Aimican Anligtdy 34:87-94, 1976 Pre-Altithermal Arclrae9jogy 41 the Sierra Pulacate, Sonora, Mexico, American Antiqui- ty, Vol. 41(3): 274-289. Millet -Ranch 1%) 35 Heidke, James 14 1998 Early Cietiega Phase Incipient Plain Ware and Tucson Phase Ceramics from tic Wetlands Site. In An/raeologicrrl Lrvestigalions at The Wletlemdr Site, .f1Z 4102.90 (ASM), by Andrea K. L. Freeninan, pp. 187 204. Technical. Report No. 97-5. .Center for Desert Archaeology, Tucson. 1999 Cienega Phase .Incipient Plain Ware from Southeastern Arizona. The IGoa 64(3):311- 338. Heilen, Jennifer M. 1999 Am Airliaeological Survey of a 32.88 a47w parcel im Puma Coimty, Arizona: The Mital%ista Survey. Cultural Resource Report No. 99-342. SWCA, Inc., Tucson. Hemminigs, E. Thomas, M. D. Robinson, and R. N. Rogers 1968 Field Report on the Pantano Site (AZ EE:2:50). lYfs on file, Arizona State Museum, University of Arizona, Tucson. Henderson,']!. I{athleen 1989 Plrhismic tikIllm-al llclipNes on the Lehi - Alm Tower Excamlions at La Cuenca del Sedimrenlo. Northland Research, Inc., Flagstaff. Henderson, T. Kathleen, and Vera Morgan 1989 Chapter 2 Project Setting, Site Descriptions, and Data Recovery Results. In Prehistoric A.picnlluml AelivNes of the I xhi klesa 7enwe: Exemadotis al La .Caeuca del Sedimemto. Hen- derson, T. Kathleen (ed). Arizona Dept. of Transportation. Phoenix Outer Loop Project, Northland Research, Inc., Flagstaff. Howard, Ann Vnldo 1987 Late Archaic Period Sliell Utilization: An Examination of Early Shell, Production and Exchange within the Southwest. Paper presented at Hohokam Symposium, Tempe. Howard, E. B. 1932 Caves along the Slopes of the Guadalupe Mountains. Bulletin of the Texas AmImreologicul and Paleontological Society 4:7 20. Westland Resources. Inc. Er.Qb10m0nd1ftA" mcmXfiwT3 a 36 ea? A Class III Cullmnl Resow es Survey for• Huckell, Bnttce B. 1984a The Arzhaie Occrpation of thor.-Roseinont Arra, .Northern Sarrta Rita 1blounlain4 Southeastern Arizona. Archaeological Series No. 147(1). Arizona State Museum, University of Arizona, Tucson. 1984b The Paleo-Indian and Archaic -Occupation of the Tucson Basin: An Overview. The Kira 49(3-4):133-145. 1987 Description of Investigated Sites. In The Cor- ona de I veson Pi Yea. Prrhisloih Use of a Beycrrla Erwimument, by Bruce B. Huckell, Martyn D. Tagg, and Lisa W. Huckell, pp. 55-121. Archaeological Series 174. Arizona State bfuseum, University of Arizona,' Tucson. 1988 Late Archaic Archaeology of the TucsQ.n Basin: A Status Report. In Reeent.Reseatrh on Tueson Basin Pirhislo y: Pro eedirgs of 11je Second Tucson Basin Corfeivnes, edited by William H. Doelle and Paul R. Fish, pp. 57-80. Anthropological Papers No. 10. Institite for Americaun Research, Tucson, 1990 Late Preceramic Farmer -Foragers in South- eastern Arizona; A Cultural and Ecological Consideration of the Spread of Agriculture into the Arid Southwestern United States. Unpublished Ph,D. dissertation, Arid Lands Resource Studies, University of Arizona, Tucson. 1995 Of klardbes and Alaite: !'rreernt»k �J,gr7crr/trawl Seltlewents in the Gmega Valley, Southeastern Aritoird. Anthropological Papers No. 59. University of Arizona Press, Tucson. 1996 The Archaic Prehistoty of the North American Southwest. Journal of II'/oriel PirUstoy 10(3):305-372. 1998 The Ground Stone Collection. In Bar•!y Fwwerr• of the Sonoran Desert, Airbaeologiced Inpesligations at the Hwovelr Road Site, Tucson, Adtona, edited by Richard Ciolek Torrello, .pp. 119-126. Technical Series No. 72, Statistical Research, Inc., Tucson. Huckell Bruce B., and Lisa W. Huckell 1984 Excavations at. Milagro, a Late Archaic Site in tine Eastern Tucson Basin. MS on file, Arizona State Museum, University of Arizona,'I'ucson. Huckell, Lisa 1993 The Shell Assemblage from Coffee Camp. In .Ambede Occrorlion of the Sawa Cryq flats: The Talor•HdIs.Pi yect, edited by Carl D. Hal- bitt and T. Kathleen Henderson, pp. 305- 316. Northland Research, Inc., Flagstaff, Lavin -Williams, Cynthia 1967 Picosa: The Elementary Southwestern Culture. Ameiiean Anli4ldy 32:44'1-457. 1979 Post-Pleistocenie Archaeology, 7000-2000 In Southwest, edited by A. Ortiz, pp. 31- 42. handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 9, W.C. Sturtevant, general editor. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Jerla, Christine, and Allen Dart 2003 Cullwal Resoanvs Srnvcy q/ ,i 2.81-Anv Panel at the Northwest Comer of Ii! Naiarya and La Canada Driver and a 4.2511a-e Panel Alorg the. .North Side of IF/. Lzilwbat I-ane IY/est of fir Canada Drive .iu Oro TVrdly, .Arizona. Letter Report No. 20032004.001. Old Pueblo Archaeology Center; Tucson. Johnson, Alfred E. 1960 The Place of the Trincheras Culture of Northern Sonora in Southwestern slrclnaeo- logy. Unpublished Master's thesis, Depart- ment of Anthropology, University .of Arizona, Tucson. Johnson, Alfred E., and William W. Wasley 1966 Archaeological Excavations Near Bylas, Arizona. Kiva, 31:205 253. Jones, Jeffrey T. 1996 An Arzlraeological Sinvfy of the Chuirli of the Apostles Proper y t�Veai• Taigaiue Road, and 1_-1. Cholla Blvd., Pena County Arizona. Letter Report. Number 96-4. Old Pueblo.Archaeo- logy Center, Tucson, Kelley, J. Chatles 1991 The Known Archaeological Ballcourts of Durango and Zacatecas, Mexico. Chaj�ter 5 in The Alesoanrenran Ball qms, edited by Vernon Scarborough and David R. Wilcox. University of Arizona Press, Tucson. Survey of37.2Acres at Tangerine Road and La Cafinda Drive, Oro 'Palley, Atlzona Kisselberg, JoAnn 1989 Variability in the Ceramic Assemblage from I.a. Cuenca del Seditnento, In Piviiisloric 1lgriwAtitnl Actioilies on lane Lelri-Mew Tenrrne: Fxairalions at La Cuenc-a del Sedintento, edited by T. ICathleen Henderson, pp. 104-153. Northland Research, Inc., Flagstaff. Lightfoot, Kent 1984 The Dlrlrean P!'ofec : a Stay of the Occupation Dwrrtion and Setllealent Pattern of an I at# bloeollon Pithouse Village. Anthropological Field Studies no. 6. Arizona State University, Tempe, Mabry, Jonathan B, 1990. A Late A)VIhaic Occylpatioli at 11Z All:12.105 (1SU). Technical Report 90-6. Center for Desert Archaeology, Tucson. 1997 Introduction. Li AirlwelogiFrrl hwestigrtllolu of Early Village Sites in tl:e Middle Santa Cnlz Malley, :Analyses aad Syn1llesir Descriptions of the Santa Cnrz Bent", Square Head& Slone Pipe, and Canal Sites, by Jonathan B. Mabry, Deborah L. Swartz, Helga Wdcherl, Jeffery J. Clark, Gavin H. Archer, and Michacl W. Linde- man, pp. 1-8. Anthropological Papers No. 18, Center for Desert Archaeology, Tucson. 1998a Conclusions. In .Arclrgeologiqrl Tnlesligdtio»s of Eau y 1/ill(ge Sites in the .Middle Santa 'Cnq Malley, Anajl ses and Synthesis, .edited by Jonathan B. Mabrry, pp. 757 792. Anthro- pological Papers No. 19, Center for Desert Archaeology, Tucson. 1998b Introduction. In Arcl�aeblagie�l.limestigations of Early Village Silos hi the Middle Santa CnrZ Valley, .Analyses and Synthesis, edited by Jonathan B. Mabry, pp. 697 738. Anthro- pological Papers No, 19, Centex for Desert Archaeology, Tucson. 1998c Mortuary Patterns. In An haeologica! Investiga- tions of Eal Village Sites in 1Jre Middle Santa Graz Iralley, Analyses and Synthesis, edited by Jonathan B. Ivlabty, pp. 697-738. Anthro- pological Papers No, 19, Center for Desert Archaeology, Tucson. MillerRanch M 37 1998d Paleoindian and A)rbaic Sites in Arizona. Center for Desert Archaeology, Tucson. 1999 Las .Capas and Early .Irrigation Farming. .4nbaeolagy Soullwest 13(1):14. 2005a Diversity in Early Southwestern Farming and Optimization Models of Transitions to Agriculture. In' Subsistence and Resolute Use Shale of Ew.1y 1 noyltrn d Cowwanues in Southeast Adzona, edited by Michael W, Dichl, pp. 113-152. Anthropological Papers 34, Center for Desert Archaeology, Tucson. 2005b Las Capas: Eary Inrgatioll and Sedentisni in a Sollthivestem P-loodplain. Anthropological Papers No. 19. Center for Desert Arcliaeo- logy, Tucson. Mabry, Jonathan B., and Gavin H. Archer 1997 The Santa Cruz Bend Site, AZ AAt12:746 (ASIvi). In 111al:aeological Investigations of Emj Village Sites in lase Middle Santa Gvrt Valley, Analyses and Synthesis: Descriptions of the Santa Cnq Bend, Square Hearth, Stone Pipe, and Canal Sites, by Jonathan Mabry, Deborah Swartz, Helga Wocherl,.Jeffeiy Clsuk, Gavin Archer„ and Michael Lindeman, pp. 9 228. Atithrc- pological Papers No. 18, Center for Desert Archaeology, Tucson. Ivlr<bry, Jonathan B., and Michael K. Faught 1998 Archaic Complexes of the Early Holocene. In .Paleoiadian and Airbale Sites in Arizona, edited by Jonathan B. Mab}:y. Technical Report 97-7. Center for Desert Archaeology, Tucson. Madsen, John I -I., Paul R. Fish, and Suzanne K. Fish 1993 The Northow Tucson Basin Shnvey: Reserutli Dbrellons and .background Studies. Archaeo- logical Serica 182, Arizona 'State Museum, University of Arizona, Tucson. Marmaduke, %Villiam S.,-and Richard j, Ivlaxtyticc 1993 Shelllowu and Hind Site: A Stu p of Tim Hohokam CrrJtwual Caainllr»illes in Solr1J1- westem 1lrizona; vol. 1. Northland Research, Inc., Flagstaff. WestLand "Resources, Inc, FnptxtdVandFfffdMMwft1CMMM wj 38 MA Class III Cultural Resoates Siuvey for Masse, W. Bruce 1980 Introduction to the Peppersauce Wash P,toj.ect. Iii Tlje Peppenaaiw bash P%jecl.- Excaw onr at 1 hire IvIlillico»ponent Sites in the Lover- San Pediv Valley, Adtwia, by Brice Masse. Contributions to Highway Salvage Archaeology in Arizona 53: Appendix F. MS. Arizona State Museum Library, University of Arizona, Tucson. 1981 A Reappraisal of the Protohistoric Sobaipuri Indians of Southeastern Arizona. In The Pivlohislwic Period in the Amviavi Soulhrvest, A.u. 1450-1700, edited by D. R. Wilcox and XVV. B. Masse, pp.28-56. Anthropological Rcscarch Papers No.29. Arizona State University, Tempe. Matson, R. G. 1991 the 017glas of Souihiyestem Agt arhure. University of Arizona.Press, Tucson. Mauldin, Raymond 1993 The Relationship between Ground Stone and Agricultural Intensification in Western New Mexico.. The ItFm 58(3):317-330. McGuire, Randall H., and Maria Elisa Villapondo C. 1993 An Archaeological Smvey of the Altar- Valley, Sonora, Alexico. Archaeological Series No. 184. Arizona State Museum, University of Arizona,'Pucson. lyforrisey,Richard J. 1950 The: Early Range Cattle Industry in Arizona. Agrical/cord Histoy, Vol.. 24, No. 2, pp. 15.1- 156. Neily, Robert B. 1985 The Snowflake -Redonda Piyecl. An Intensive Arilraeologieal Storey in tie Upfier.Little Colorado River Area of East -Cairns Arizona: Cultural Resource Management Division, Arizona State Museum, University of Arizona, Tucson. Officer, J"kmes E. 1987 Hispauie Ari.Zona. University of Arizona Press, Tucson. Plummer, Shannon D. 2001 An lkhaeological Sruvy for Prnpored .Road Iv»prnucnrents a/og Taugaine Road, Om Valley, Pima Catuily, At7Zana. SWCA Environmental Consultants, Tucson. Reidjefferson, and Stephanie Whittlesey 1997 'Be Archaeology of Ancient Arizona. Unversity of Arizona Press, Tucson. Reich, J. Jefferson, Barbara Me Montgomery, Maria Nieves Zedctio, and Mark A. Neupert 1992 The Origin of Roosevelt. Redware. In PrnceedirW of the Second Salado Coi jirnw, :Globe, A.dZona 1P92,_ edited by Richard C. Lange and Stephen GeArLick. Arizona Archaco- logical Society, Phoenix. Rice, Glen E. 1998 Migration, Emulation, and Tradition in Tonto Basin Prehistory. In A Synthesis of Tonto Basin Ptehistoy. The Reasevelt Airhaeo- logical Studies, 1939 1998, edited by Glen E. Rice, pp. 1-9. Roosevelt Monograph Series No. 12, Anthropological Field Studies No. 41. Office. of Cultural Resource Manage- ment, Arizona State University, Tempe. Rogers, Malcolm B. 1966 Ancient hunters of the. Far `Vest. Union Tirbune, San Diego. Roth,.Barbara J. 1989 Late Archaic Settlement -atid Subsistence in the Tucson Basin. Unpublished Pli.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson. 1992 Sedentary Agriculturalists or Mobile .1-Iunger-Gatherers? Recent Evidence of the Late Archaic Occupation of the Northern Tucson Basin. The Nva 57(4):291-314, 1993 Changing Perceptions of the Late Archaic: An Example from the Southern Southwest. iNorlhAmed anA)rhaeolight 14:123-137. 1996 Early Fqalialive ,Adaplations in 14e Southem Sorlhtvest, edited by Barbara J. Roth. Monographs in World Archaeology No. 5. Prehistory Press, Madison. Survey of37.2Acres at Tangadne Road and La Catfad i Drive, Ora Valley, Arizona Rozen, Kenneth C. 1979 The Ambaeological Sinvey of the Nottlietw Tueson 138kV 1 irursmdrsdon Line Syrte�ir..Tbe Notthem Tucson Bastin and Laver Saula CmZ Valley, A?kooa. .Archaeological Series No.132. Arizona State Museutm,.Tucson. 1985 Letter Repot to a Ali. Al Dickie Regarding 11Z State Land Application 03-92401. Arizona Statc Land Department, Phoenix. Saxton, Dean, and Lucille Saxton 1973 O'otlibum Hoho'ok A'agilha: Legends 7rud Lou of the 1 apego and Pima Inddanr. University of Arizona Press, Tucson. Sayles, E. B. 1945 The San Simon Branch,. Exrapatio s at Cam Cmek in the San Simon Valley.• Vohims 1. lklate,dal Cullum Medallion Papers No. 34. Gila Pueblo, Globe. 1983 The Coehire Cukutnl Sequence in Southeartem Aikma. Anthropological Papers of the University of Arizona No. 42. University of Arizona Press, Tucson. Sayles, E. B., and Ernst Antevs 1941 The Cochire Cullum Medallion Papers No, 29. Gila Pueblo, Globe. Schroeder, Albert I -I. 1957 The .Hakatnyn Cultural Tradition. Ameticon Antigtdly 23:176-178. Scott, Barry G. 1992a tin Atrl)aeologieal Srrtvey of a l'mposed Fo yActu Development Om Valley, Pima County, AtiZona. Iguana Archaeological Research Consult- A6ts; Tucson, 1992b An ALrheteologdcalSruveyofaPtnposedSdxyAciv Development in Otn Valley, Pima Coun!y, Aiikom. Iguana Archaeological Research Consultants, Tucson. Sellers, William B., kind Richard H. Hill 1974 AtiZotra. Climate,. 1,932-1972. University of Arizona Press, Tucson. Millcr&rnch 8c) 39 Seymour, Gregory R., Richard V. N. Alilstrom, and David P. Doak 1997 The Sanchez .Copper Pt yet. Volume 1: AtalxreologiralInmlfgaldons in the S#) Valley, Ginham Coxgy, Ai Zona. SWCA Aichneo- logical Report No. 94-82. SWCA, Inc., Envirottt.nental .Consultants, Tucson. Shackley, Steven M. 1996 Range and Mobility in the Hunter -gatherer Southwest. In EaijEommfive Ad.,01adom in the Sombem Southwest, edited by Barbara J. Roth. Monographs in World Archaeology No. 5. Prehistory Press, Nhadison. Sheridan, Thomas E. 1995 AtrZoiter A Histoy University of Arizona Press, Tucson. Sunon, Arleyn W.;1nd David Jacobs 2000 Salado Social Dynamics: Nctworks and Alliances in the Tonto Basin. In Salado, edited by Jeffrey S. Dean. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque. Slaughter, Mark C. 1992 Flaked Stone .in Arizona. In Makdig apd bring Slone Attdfacts: A Context for Evaluating Lithic Sites do AriZota, by Mark C. Slaughter, Lee Pratt,. Kirk Anderson, and Richard. V. N. Ahlstrom, pp.2.1-2.12. Prepared by SWCA, Inc., Environmegtal Consultants, Tucson. Distributed by the Arizona State Historic Preservation Office, Phoenix. $Iawson, Laurie V. 2001 A Cultmmel Resorrlres Inventoy fo' w Pivpomd I'elecn»unundcatiour Site (PH54XC510B) East of the Entrance 10 the .Copper Ridge 11 Subdivision in Om Valley, Atitola. Technical Report No. 2001-128, Aztlan Archaeology, Inc., Tucson. Spicer, Edward H. '1962 Cycler of Conquest,• The Impact of Spain, Alexav, and the United Stater on the Indians of the Southwest; 1533=19660. University of Arizona Press, Tucson. WestLand Resources. Inc. rNtvAvwJ(mWN WrACcnKMi 40 og A Claus III Cullman. Resources Survey for Stark, ,Ivtiriam T., Jeffrey J. Clark, and Mark D. Elson 1905 Causes And Consequences of Migration in. the 1311, Century Tonto Basin. Journal of Anthr .pologicarlAnbaeology 14:212-246. Stein, Pat II. '1990 Homeaeading in .Arizona, 1862 to 1940.• A Guide to S/trying, .Evahrati% and Prrserviug Mslmrc H'omeaeadr. Arizona State Parks Historic Context. Arizona State Historic Preservation Office, Phoenix. 1994 .Hlslo is Trails in Arizona from Coronado to 1940. A component of the Arizona IT Preservation Plan. SWCA, Flagstaff. Stephen, David V. M. 1984 R port fir Tangerine Rood/La Canada Archaeo- lagh-al E*oinlian (PAST Job Nim1ber 83-10). Letter Report 3/1/1984, Professional Archaeological Services and Technologies, Tucson. 1994 Reportfo,•Naraiya/Sec.2,ArchaeologicalExplor= drtiorr, Pima County, ,Ildtona. Professional Archaeological Services and Technologies, Tucson. 1999 Report jor Nmdrrya Sec: 2 (ASCU #53-102399) Arzlraealogical Stavey. Professional Archaco- logical Services and'I'echnologies, Tucson. 2000 Letter Repot fm• La Canada/Taigefim NEC Ai?jea. PA.S.T Repoit No. 00'1277 Profes- sional Archaeological Services and Tech- nologies, Tucson. 2003 Cultural Resoanes Sumfy of the Tangerine - La Cholld Inteirection Pi feet near Ono Valley, Kim County, Arizona Professional llrchacological Services and Technologies,'I'ucson. Stone, Connie, and Todd Bostwick 1995 Environmental Contexts and Archaeological Correlates: The Transition to .Fanning in the Three Regions of the. Arizona Desert. In Eruy. Romialive Adaptations in the Southeni Southwest, edited by Barbara J. Roth. Monographs in World Archaeology No. 5. Pielustory Press, Madison, Stone, Lyle M., and Daniel R. Bontrager 1987 CnIlln rl Resources Smvey of a 12 Afile Long Se i»ent of Tager ne Road Belrveen Fart Avenue and Inteirtate 10, in Northeast Pinta Cony, Arizona. Archaeological Research Services, Tuc.,'I'empe. Swartz, Dcborali L. 1995 An Archaeological Smvy Alorg Mem Road and La Cholla Boulevard. Letter Report 94-1081. Desert Archaeology, Tucson. Teague, Lynn S. 1993 Prehistory and the Traditions of the O'Odham and Hopi. Kiva, 58(4).435-454. 1998 Textiles in Soralhrvestety Ptehirloy Universityof New Mexico Press, Albuquerque. Thiel, Homer, and Jonathan B. Mabry 1998 Cicnega Phase Btuial Patterns. In Artbaso- logical Investigations ai the Wellands Site, AZ -114:12.90 (ASM), by Andrea K. L. Freeman, pp. 81-128. Report No. 97-5. Ccnter for Desert .tlrchacology, Tucson. Turner, Raymond, and David Brown 1994 Tropical -Subtropical Deserdands. In Bielic Cq.,m1pnrilies: Soidlimestem United States and 11Tottimestem Ahwieo, edited by D.. Brown, pp. 180-2222. University of Utali Press, Salt Lake City. Vandcrpot, Rein 1997 From Foraging to Farming: Prelustorie Settlement and Stibsistence Dynamics in the San Pedro Valley. In Pixhisloy of the Boidletlandr.•.Recent Reteamb in.rheAirbaeolow e Northeni Mexico and the Sonthmu Southwest, edited by John .Carpenter and G. Sanchez. Arizona State Musetun Archaeological Series No. 186. University of Arizona, Tucson. Yokes, Arthur 1998a Shell Artifacts. In Airbareologkrrl Iir1, s , ti0 r of Emy Village Sher in the Middle Ssmla CmZ Valley, Analyses and Synthesis, edited by Jonathan B. Mabry; pp. 437-470. Anthro- pological Papers No. 19, Center for Desert Archaeology, Tucson. Survey oP37.2Acres at Tangerine Road and La Cati'ada D,rlve, Oro Valley,.ArLono 1998b Shell Material From the Wetlands Site. In Archaeological Ittvest&Xans of the Wetlands Site, AZ A.11:12.90 (ASM), edited by Andrea K. L. Freeman, pp. 249-264. Report No. 97-5. Center for Desert Archaeology, Tucson. 2005 Early Agricultural Period Shell Use. In iWatenal Culhuys .and 1 ifejxr yx of Early Agricnlhaul Co»»uuaities .in Southern Ankona, edited by Jane Sliva, pp. 153-1.70. Anthro- pological Papers No. 34. Center for Desert Archaeology,'Tucson. Walker, Henry P., and Don Bufkin 1979 Histotieal Allay of AtiZona. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman. %yallace, IIemy D. 1986 Rincon Plwse Decotraed Cvwdcx in the Twon Basin. A Fours on lbe ir/esibtrincb Site. Anthropological Papers No. 1. Institute for American Research, Tucson. 1988 2003 Ceramic Boundaries and Interregional Interaction: New Perspectives on the Tucson Basin Hohokam. In Reeent Reseanb on Tucson Basin Ptyhistoy: Ptoceedigs of the Second 7'rtcson Basin Cotf trnce, edited by William H. Doelle and Paul R. Fish, pp. 313-348. Anthropological Papers No. 10. Institute for American Research, Tucson. Roots of Seelentirm, Archaeological Exc.•awlious at YrtleucYa I/i!Va, a Forurding Villago in the Tucson Brrsiii of Soulliern Arizona, edited by Henry D. kyallace, pp. 323-370. Anthropological Papers No. 29. Center for Desert Archaeo- logy"Ilncson. Wallace, Uemy D., and James P. Hohiilund 1984 The Classic Period in the "( won Basin. Ms. on file; At State INluscum Library, Tucson. Wallace, henry D., James Ivi. Heidke, and %lliam H. Doelle 1995 Iohokam Origins. Kiva 60(4):575-618. Whalen, Norman NI. 1971 Cociuse Culture Sites in the Central San Pedro Drainage, Arizona.. Unpublished Pli.D..dissertation, Department of Anthro- pology, University of Arizona, Tucson. Alille)-Raxlj 20 41 Whitdcsey, Stephanie M. 1998 Early Formative Stage Ceramics and Cultural Affiliation. In Early Faimety of .the Sonotan Deserl, ArchaeolseicalInvestigations at the Houghton Load Site, 1 esotr, AtiZona, edited by Richard Ciolek-Toirello,. pp. '209-228. Technical Series No. 72, Statistical Research, Inc., Tucson. 2003 Wvety of.Rock: Sloties fima a Stoue-Dy land. Ceuhul AtiZona A jeer Ataltaeologyt SRI Press, Tucson. Wluttlesey, Stephanie M., and R. Ciolek-Torrello 1992 A Revolt against Rampant Elites: dward and Alternative Paradigm. In Pioceedhgs of the Second Salado C'ot fetynce, Globe, Arizona, 7992, edited by Richard C. Lange and Stephen Germic, .pp. 312-324. Occasional Paper. Arizona Archaeological Society, Phoenix. 1996 The Archaic -Formative Transition in the Tucson Basin, In Eat# Foir»aliw Adaptations in the Soulllern Southwest, edited by Barbara J. Roth, pp. 49-64. Monographs in World Archaeology #5. Prehistory.Press, Madison. Whittlesey, Stephanie M., R. Ciolek-Torrello, .and l`tiilliann L. Deaver 1994 Resurrecting the Mum: The Early Formative Period in Arizona, Me gollott T/17, the Collected Papety of the 1992 tllogollon Confewics Held its l.qs Cnices, New ttilexico, pp. 31-42. Coas .Publishing and Research, Las Cruces. Wilcox, David R. 1979 The Hohokam Regional System. In An Atchaeological Test of Sites in the Gila Bnite- Sdntan Region, Soatb CenhrrlAiiZonq, edited by Glen Rice, D. Wilcox, K. Rcfferty, and J. Schoenwetter, pp. 77-116. Technical Paper No. 3, Anthropological Rescakch Papers No. 18. Arizona State University, Tempe. 1987 New Models -of Social Structure at the Palo Parado Site. In The Holjokav lf%illage: Site Shrrctrue.and Otganixation, edited by David E. Doyel, pp. 253-262. Southwestern and Rocky Mountain Division, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Glenwood Springs. WestLand Resources, Inc. trpYmkvwAirt/rammk9CzKft d, 42 eza A Class IN Cultmal Reratuxer Surveyfor Wilcox; David R., and Charles Sternberg 1983 1-1ohokm Balleorrrts and Their Intaprrtaliou. Archaeological Series No. 1G0. Arizona State Museum, University of Arizona, Tucson. Wilcox, David It., and Lynette G. Shenk 1977 The AMVI.eatrur of lbe Cam Gtwnde and it lidetprrtaliou. Archaeological Series 'No. 115. Arizona State Museum, University of Arizona, Tucson. Wilcox, David It., Thomas McGuire, and Charles Sternberg 1981 Snaketown Revisited. A Panial Cullarrd Rerom- e Survey, Analysis of Site Sttrrcbrty and an Elhuohirtwic Stu y of the Prnpored Hohokam- Piraa National blouunieut. Arizona State Museuin Archaeological Series No..155, The University of Arizona,'Tucson. Wills" Wirt I -I., III 1988 Eat•!# Pirlihimie Agrieldliae br the 41,jetican Southwest School of American Research Press, Santa Fe. Wilson, John P. 1999 Peoples of • the Aliddle Gila: A Derlimentag Histo y of the Amat and Mamopas, 1 SOOs- 19IS. Researched and written for the Gila River Indian Community, Sacaton, Arizona, 1998 (Revised 1999). Report No. 77, Las Cruces. Wocherl, Helga, and JeffeiyJ. Clark 1997 The Square Hearth Site, AZ AA:12:745 (ASIvo. In Attlureological Itryertigationt of any Village Siter in ,the Middle Santa Ctrs- Valley. Deseriplion of the Santa _ Cnq Bend, Squan Hearth, Stone Poe, and Canal S41et. Anthropological Papers No.18. Center for Desert Archaeology, Inc., Tucson. Wood, J. Scott 2000 Vale of Tiers Palimpsest: Salado Settlement 'and Internal Relationships in the 'Tonto Bashi Area. In Salado, edited by Jeffrey S. Dean. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque: Woodson,.Ivi. Kyle . 1999 Migrations in Late Anasazi Prehistory: The Evidence from the Goat Hill Site. Kiva G5:G3-84. 200E The Goat Hill Site and Ancestral Pueblo Migrations into the Safford Basin. Arthaeologp SoMijivest 20(2):4. Center for Desert Archaeology, Tticson. Zedeao, Mark Nieves 1994 Selacirg Puhisfmic Cemmia at Chodistaar ,Pueblo, Atitona: The Cinulahm of People and Pots in Rgiou. Anthropological Papers of the University of Arizona, Number 58. University of Arizona Press, Tucson. Survey bf37.2Acres at7attgeriae Road and La Q iada Drive, Oro Valley, Adkona UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE Tucson AZ 85726-9998 August 26, 2008 Shirley Gay Development Coordinator Town of Oro Valley Planning & Zoning Division 11000 N La Canada Drive Oro Valley AZ 85737-7016 SUBJECT: Construction Projects and Recommendations for Delivery of Mail RE: OV 1208-07A Miller Ranch Development Plant Phase 1 TECH Park — General & Medical Offices Parcel #21947017A Please contact the Postal Service before purchasing or installing mail receptacles. The Postal Service is not responsible for costs incurred to move or replace mail receptacles installed prior to obtaining proper authorization. Mail receptacles must be located on the delivery line of travel established by the Postal Service. To obtain approvals necessary to initiate mail delivery, please contact the USPS at least 90 days prior to the first move in. Your Postal Service contact for this project is: Station Manager: ORO VALLEY BRANCH Phone Number: 520.229.0320 ' Ro;;ASoler �)cV Ylc- e. Customer Relations Coordinator RAS: and r cc: Station Manager: 85737 w/encl: "Project Checklist" TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT 11000 N La Canada Drive, Oro Valley, AZ 85737 (520) 229-4800 — Fax (520) 742-1022 May 13, 2010 Tri Miller Rick Engineering Company 1745 E. River Road, Suite 101 Tucson, AZ 85718 Fax: 322-6956 Re: OV12-08-07 & OV12-08-07A, Master development plan, phase 1 & 2 development plan, master landscape plan and phase 1 & 2 landscape plan for the Miller Ranch project, located on the northwest corner of La Canada Drive and Tangerine Road. Dear Tri, At their regular meeting of May 11, 2010, the Development Review Board (DRB) voted (5 - 0) to recommend conditional approval of the development plans and landscape plans for this project. The conditions approved by the DRB are included in Exhibit A. Each of the conditions must be addressed prior to Town Council review of this project. As specified in the Oro Valley Zoning Code, comments must be summarized in letterform. Submit ten (10) full size 24" X 36" folded copies and eighteen (18) legible 11"x17" folded copies of the master development plan and phase 1 & 2 development plan. Also, five full size 24"x36" folded copies of the master landscape plan and phase 1 & 2 landscape plan are required for final staff certification. As part of the resubmittal, please make sure that all outstanding agency comments have been addressed (PC wastewater, PC addressing, GR Fire and OV Water etc). Upon resubmittal staff will closely evaluate conformance with the aforementioned conditions. At this point, it will be determined whether the project may proceed to Town Council. If all pertinent conditions are satisfied, the project will be scheduled for the earliest Town Council meeting. Because a resubmittal is required, the June 16 meeting will not be feasible. If the resubmittal is received by May 24, the project can be tentatively scheduled for review by Council on July 7. At this point, you may submit grading, paving, drainage, and wastewater improvement plans for review. Plans for onsite, offsite, and utility improvements are required. Furthermore, final installation of the public art must be achieved prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, as each phase is developed. As you are aware, the applicant is required to provide a presentation at the Town Council meeting. The presentation must be in powerpoint or overhead projection and approximately 5 minutes in length. Please let me know at 229-4817 or dronguillo(aD-orovalleyaz.gov if you should have any questions. We look forward to the successful completion of this project. Sincerely, David Ronquillo Senior Planner cc: Shirley Gay Michael Sarabia, msarabiaC@Descoqroup.com EXHIBIT A OV1208-07 & 07A MILLER RANCH DEVELOPMENT MAY 11, 2010 Planning 1. Label the pedestrian pathway along the edge of the wash as a "non motorized public recreation easement". It will be required as a dedicated easement. 2. Clarify the maximum building height in general note #5 to conform to the rezoning condition. For buildings 11-13, the maximum building height is 28 feet with the exception of architectural elements which shall not exceed 4 feet above the 28 feet. Only appurtenances necessary for the elevator shaft for buildings 11-13 will be allowed up to 34 feet. The remaining buildings (5-10) are allowed up to 34 feet as permitted in the T-P zone. 3. Prior to final staff certification of the plan, submit a response letter addressing conformance with all outstanding rezoning conditions. 4. Prior to Town Council approval, the applicant must work with staff to determine an implementation plan for the required wash restoration improvements. Puhlic Works 5. General Comment: Address all redlined comments within the master development plan and drainage report. Provide a comment response letter and return all redlined originals back to the Town of Oro Valley. 6. Sheet 11: Provide additional level landings at the top and bottom of each ramp run proposed between Buildings 12 and 13. For a ramp sloped between 1:16 (6.25%) and 1:20 (5%), the maximum rise shall be 30 inches and the maximum horizontal run shall be 40 feet. Revise as necessary. 7. Sheet 11: A portion of sidewalk located adjacent to the northeast corner of Building 12 appears to have a running slope greater than 1:20 (5%). Any part of an accessible route with a slope greater than 1:20 shall be considered a ramp and shall comply with ADAAG requirements (e.g. handrail, level landings, etc.). Revise as necessary. 8. Drainage Report: State the proper local regulatory flow rate criterion as being 50 cfs. Section 2.2, Existing (On -site) Conditions, indicates 100 cfs as the local regulatory flow rate. 9. . Drainage Report: Clarify how the proposed detention basins will function to attenuate the 2, 10, and 25-year peak flows. Peak flow rates and velocities at any point of concentration leaving the site cannot exceed the pre -developed flow rates and velocities for that concentration point for each frequency storm event. Provide additional information as necessary. F,,,LE r qk� *'° F'ONNDED *1 A Town of Oro Valley Planning & Zoning October 3, 2008 Tri Miller Rick Engineering Company 1745 E. River Road, Suite 101 Tucson, AZ 85718 Fax: 322-6956 Re: OV12-08-07 & OV12-08-07A&B, Master development plan and specific development plan/preliminary plat for the Miller Ranch Property, located on the northwest corner of La Canada Drive and Tangerine Road. Dear Tri, Thank you for submitting the formal application for this project. Based on your recent submittal, staff has reviewed the proposed plans. Our goal is to resolve any issues and reiterate comments that were discussed at the development review committee meeting of September 19. Based on a formal review, the following comments must be addressed; Major Items • The zoning boundary/property line on the west side of the property as depicted on the Tentative Development Plan (approved as part of rezoning) does not match the proposed development plan. Specifically it is the western edge of the 15' apron located along the eastern portion of the wash. Revise the zoning boundary accordingly. • In order to help streamline the development plan process and minimize the amount of plans, staff recommends that you achieve one of the following: 1. Submit only one "development plan/preliminary plat" depicting the entire site. In the future, if changes are necessary a revised development plan may be submitted and depending 6n the extent of the change will either be administratively approved or proceed through the formal development review process. If you anticipate only minor changes to the layout as the rest of the site is developed this would be the best approach. 2. Submit a "master development plan" for the entire site and a "development plan/preliminary plat" for the commercial and technological park (areas to be developed as part of phase one). In the future, subsequent development plans can be submitted for the remaining phases. If you anticipate major changes in the future this would be the best approach. www.orovalleyaz.gov 11000 N. La Canada Drive • Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 phone: (520) 229-4800 • fax: (520) 742-1022 Portions of buildings 12 & 13 do not meet the required rear setbacks. The zoning boundary/property line is located along the eastern portion of the wash not the centerline of the wash. The building setback is measured from this edge and because it is abutting a single family residential area, a minimum 50' setback or 3:1 ratio, which ever is greater shall apply. Revise the plan accordingly. The wash restoration plan submitted does not address the western edges of the wash as required in the rezoning condition. In general, the density of plants must substantially increase. Staff will be hiring RECON Environmental as a third party consultant to assist the Town in the review process. Please be aware that per the OVZCR the developer/applicant will be charged for any fees associated with these services. I will be contacting you shortly to set up a meeting to discuss the specifics. Transit stops for commercial and industrial developments over 100,000 square feet shall be provided. We will discuss the specifics with the Town Transit Administrator and provide you with more details on the exact location. OVZCR - Master Development Plan/Development Plans • Developments that have over 80 parking spaces or more should provide at least 10% of the total parking designated for use by car pools. Label the spaces accordingly. • Provide a response specifying how each of the rezoning conditions has and/or will be addressed. • Access will be limited off La Canada Drive - see Public Works comments for more specifics. • TEP has significant concerns regarding the availability of providing service to this site. Please coordinate with TEP to address this issue. • Provide a key map on sheet 1 or 2 showing the entire site followed by subsequent sheets. • Access off Sunkist Drive may only be used for emergency purposes as specified on the Tentative Development Plan. Revise the plan accordingly. • Clearly label the property lines and the total number of lots on each sheet and all other applicable areas. • The passenger drop off area/loading zones that are located adjacent to buildings 7 & 8 may create traffic hazards as vehicles enter the site. Delete them accordingly: A passenger drop off area is required for the bank building. The drop off areas shown in proximity to the southern end of buildings 1 & 2 will not be adequate and should be removed. A passenger drop off area must be designated on the northeastern corner of building 1 (bank). • In general, clearly label the drop off areas (curb edge and areas where vehicles can maneuver) adjacent to buildings 3, 4, 5, 9, and 10. • Provide the required information on the upper right corner of sheet 1 (map centered, and label adjacent zoning). • On the lower right corner of each sheet reference to the previous rezoning case number (OV9-04-02). • The notes and calculations must be combined with the numbered "general notes". Delete the duplicate notes (basis of bearing and elevation datum). • Provide a general note regarding the I % requirement for public art. • Label what portions of the site will satisfy the 2% requirement for the courtyard/plaza amenities. Provide the square footage for these areas. • Provide a note with the floor area ratio for the commercial and technological park areas (separate calculations). • The total open space for T-P Districts is .25%. Revise the plan accordingly. • Clarify on the development plan if the handicap spaces are included as part of the total parking numbers. If not, the development is over -parked and an alternative parking analysis will be required. • Provide the total number of employee parking spaces. General Comments • The circular textured areas adjacent to building 9 & 10 should extend across the access drive as shown in the other areas (buildings 3, 4, & 5). Clearly label the type of pavement and materials. • The development plan should include only the areas to be developed as part of that phase and the remaining areas should be ghosted in. • The rezoning conditions on sheet 8 must be moved to the cover sheet or sheet 1 of the plan. • Provide a turnaround area on the north side of building 13. • A pedestrian path should be established along the eastern edge of the wash extending the length of the property line. Remove the pedestrian sidewalks extending from the commercial area west across the access drive to the detention basins. We will establish connections as part of the wash restoration plan. • Sidewalk connections between buildings (I and 2/3) must be perpendicular to the access drive (see engineering redlines). Landscape Plan • All buildings must have a minimum 10' landscaped area on all four sides. Portions of the sidewalk may be included as part of the landscape area. Several buildings do not meet this requirement. In areas that have covered overhangs potted plants and planters may be provided as a mitigation measure. • In an effort to help streamline the landscape plan process and minimize the amount of plans, staff recommends that you combine the landscape plans for the commercial and technological park areas into one. It is not necessary to submit individual plans. Similar to the development plan, you can submit either just one landscape plan for the entire site or a master landscape plan and one landscape plan for phase 1. • Provide a note specifying that subsequent landscape plans for the remaining phases must be submitted and approved by the Development Review Board. • The irrigation plan and notes should be located at the end of the landscape plan. Distinguish the plans as landscape plan and "irrigation plan." • A minimum 15' Buffer yard `B" is required along the west property line. Label this accordingly. • A minimum 40% of trees must be 24" boxed or greater. Revise the plan accordingly. • Provide a cross hatched area to represent the landscaping that will be achieved as part of the wash restoration plan. • Label the height of all screen and retaining walls on the plan. • Every nine spaces must have a landscape island. A portion of the parking area east of building 13 exceeds this number. • All pedestrian sidewalks must provide a colored concrete surface, brick paver or other textured material (not painted). Clearly label this on the plan. • The irrigation specifications and detailed notes on sheets 17-20 are not necessary. Remove these from the plan. • Required screening (masonry wall, earthen berm and/or vegetation to provide a 5' high opaque screen) must be provided along the Nvest side property line. This is required because the site abuts a single family residential area (R1-144). • Walls greater than 40' in length must be broken up by using the design techniques as specified in the code. Native Plant Preservation Plan (NPPP) • Provide only one plan for the commercial and technological areas. • Provide the location of the temporary nursery on the site. • Provide a plant legend symbol for trees to be preserved in place. Other Agency Comments Public Works Oro Valley Water Golder Ranch Fire Pima County Addressing Pima County Wastewater State Historic Preservation Office. Tucson Electric Power Summary The resubmittal must include fifteen (15) full size copies, twenty (28) 11 "x17" reduced copies of the master development plan and/or development/preliminary plat, seven (7) full size copies, 28 11"x17" reduced copies of the landscape plan, and fifteen (15) copies of the response letter addressing all agency comments. In addition, three (3) full size copies of the native plant preservation plan are required. There are no resubmittal deadlines; therefore, the plans may be submitted at your convenience. A tentative project schedule will be detennined once all zoning code requirements have been addressed. Please let me know at 229-4817 if you have any questions. ;Sincerely, David Ronquillo Senior Planner Attachments: Agency Comments cc: Shirley Gay Mike Bartlett, Desco Southwest, Fax: 297-8943 ,1PLDEy C TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT 11000 N. La Canada Drive, Oro Valley, AZ 85737 (520) 229-4800 Fax (520) 742-1022 `OUNDED 191N August 29. 2008 Mike Bartlett Desco Southwest 1795 East Skyline Drive, Suite 193 Tucson. AZ 85714 Fax: 297-8943 Re: ON-12-08-07, ON'12-08-07A S ON712-08-0713, !Master Development Plan and Specific DeN-elopment Plan/Preliminary Plat for Phase one of the Miller Ranch property, located on the northii est corner of La Canada DHN-e and Tangerine Road. Dear Mike. Thank you for submitting a formal application for this project. Based on your submittal of August 20. 2008. staff has certified the applications to begin the review process. There is a four week review period and 1 will set up a Development Review Committee meeting on Thursday. September 18 to discuss the staff comments. Once the formal continents have been provided. a tentative schedule will be determined. We look f6iivard to working with you on this project. Please let me know at 229-4817 if you should have any questions. S' erely, David Ronquillo Senior Planner cc: Shirley Gay Tri Miller. Fax: 322-6956 F �►�` nA I_ I(ie_n7<,�V@'irVVl►I`tS'19''`'`g�s MILLER RANCH Page 2 OV 12-08-07 August 20, 2008 Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the third(3`d) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $39.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above -mentioned comments, please contact me. Development Services 201 N. STONE AV., 2ND FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH#: 740-6800 FAX #: 623-5411 TO: TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: OV1208-07A MILLER RANCH PHASE 1 TECH PARK/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 12/01/09 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: Delete or complete Vistoso Gate Bk 57 on sheet 5. 1. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to the Town of Oro Valley Planning Department. 2. All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 JENNIFER STEPHENS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM: JENNIFER STEPHENS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: OV1208-07A MILLER RANCH DEVELOPMENT PLAN PHASE I TECH PARK/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: January 8, 2009 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1.) Per comment letter dated 9/17/08: Label entire project number on all sheets. (OV1208-07A). 2.) Per comment letter dated 9/17/08: Delete parcel numbers from all sheets. 3.) Per comment letter dated 9/17/08: Question: County records indicate several parcels for this project. Will they be combined? If not, show property lines for parcels on plan. �f; 0911.7/2008 17:22 5207406370 PIMA COUNTY ADDRESS[; PAGE 01/03 T r JENNIFER STEP14ENS ADDRESSING OFFTCJ.,kL PR: 740-6480 FA\..#: 740-4370 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 TO: TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING DEPAa FROM: JENNIFER STEPHENS, ADDRESSING OFFIC) SUBJECT: OV1208-07A MILLER RANCH PHASE I -TECH DATE. September 17, 2008 W iMW Wi W+MWWWWNI MfkMMMM*�AMdi�+kd ii�kW:i iW�i#�k•diWWWWWMWWM�kM MM.k.M*.t �FMiiW 4dii+ki.ii WWWd W.kWWW*M4MMMN4�hM FdWWi doh The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street namin�g/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prlar to our approval: 1.) Delete parcel numbers from all sheets. 2-) Add recorded Book and Page to Vistoso gateway, sheet 1. 3.) Label entire project number on all sheets. 4.) Delete all Docket and page and owner information for surrounding parcels on all sheets. 5.) Include Buildings 5-8 on title block. 6.) Correct project location on location map to show only this project. Question: County records indicate several parcels for this Project. WHI they be combined? If not, show property lines for parcels on plan. 0 `Y $Vt SOUTHWEST GAS [ORPORIIi1011 August 26, 2008 Town of Oro Valley Planning & Zoning Department 11000 N.La Canada Dr. Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 OV1208-07A MILLER RANCH PH I TECH PARK OV1208-07B MILLER RANCH DEV., BANK RETAIL RESTAURANT Southwest Gas Corporation has no objection to the platting of the above mentioned project. However, existing natural gas facilities are located in adjacent right-of-way which may be affected by construction of this project. Blue Stake should be notified 48 hours prior to construction. Further information regarding natural gas facilities on or near this project may be acquired by contacting me at 794-6049. T4,c'! RICK BARON/ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN 3401 East Gas Road / Tucson, Arizona 85714-1994 P.O. Box 26500 / Tucson, Arizona 85726-6500 / (520) 889-1888 / 1-800-428-7324 www.swgas.com NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING Town Council The Town Council invites the community to attend a public meeting on Wednesday, July 21, 2010, 6 p.m. Oro Valley Town Hall, 11000 N. La Canada Dr. Oro Valley, Arizona OV1208-07 & 07A, Desco Southwest, represented by Rick Engineering Company, requests approval of a master development plan and Phase 1 and 2 development plan for the Miller Ranch project, located on the northwest corner of Tangerine Road and La Canada Drive. The meeting will be held in the Town Council Chambers. The public is encouraged to attend and will be invited to speak. An agenda for this meeting will be made available at least 24 hours prior to meeting time and can be viewed at www.orovalleyaz.gov. For questions and additional information, please contact David Ronquillo, Senior Planner, at (520) 229-4817 or dronguilloCD-orovalle r�gov. Matt Michels Senior Planner Posted: 6-29-10 Time: 8:00 a.m. By: sg S:\permplus\docs\OV1208-07\PZ_7-21-10.TCnotice.doc TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT 11000 N La Canada Drive, Oro Valley, AZ 85737 (520) 229-4800 — Fax (520) 742-1022 May 27, 2010 Re: OV1208-07 & 07A, Neighborhood meeting notice, master development plan and phase 1 & 2 development plan for the Miller Ranch property. Dear Neighbor: Desco Southwest, represented by Rick Engineering Company has submitted a request to develop the Miller Ranch property located on the northwest comer of La Canada Drive and Tangerine Road. The zoning for this site is C-1, Commercial District and T-P, Technological Park District. A neighborhood meeting will be held at the Oro Valley Town Complex on Tuesday, June 15, 2010 at 6:00 PM., in the Town Council Chambers located at 11000 N. La Canada Drive. At this meeting, the applicant will provide a brief presentation of the project, answer questions, and address any issues or concerns. Town staff will be present to provide background information on process and zoning code requirements. If you have any questions, please contact David Ronquillo, Senior Planner, at 520-229-4817 or d rong u i l lo(a.orova I leyaz.g ov Sincerely, David Ronquillo Senior Planner Town Council Page 1 of 13 MINUTES ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION July 21, 2010 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION CALL TO ORDER - at 6:00 p.m. PRESENT: Satish Hiremath, Mayor Bill Garner, Vice Mayor Barry Gillaspie, Councilmember Joe Hornat, Councilmember Mary Snider, Councilmember Steve Solomon, Councilmember Lou Waters, Councilmember PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Mayor Hiremath led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS Communications Administrator Mary Davis reviewed the upcoming Town meetings. COUNCIL REPORTS - No reports. DEPARTMENT REPORTS Town Clerk Kathi Cuvelier announced that artist Pam Davis was in the audience and that her artwork was currently on display in the Council Chambers. Town Engineer Craig Civalier informed Council that the last Lambert Lane open house (to review road improvements) would be held August 18, 2010 from 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. Interim Assistant Town Manager Stacey Lemos stated that the Arizona League of Cities and Towns published an article regarding a day in the life of a municipal employee and featured Oro Valley Town Clerk Kathi Cuvelier. Communications Administrator Mary Davis informed Council that the Dispose-A-Med program would take place at the Oro Valley Target store on Saturday, July 24, 2010 from 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. CALL TO AUDIENCE Oro Valley resident Adelina Kempner stated that the Town had not properly followed the Public Participation ordinance. She reviewed the importance of the ordinance noting that it established a working relationship between the residents and developers. She stated that a project had been scheduled for Council's approval without public participation. She http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=968 10/26/2010 Town Council Page 2 of 13 requested that Council acknowledge the public's sentiment and address the issue. Mayor Hiremath reminded the audience to approach the members of the Council with respect. Oro Valley resident Lyra Done stated that the fees for sign permits for realtors was unfair. Golder Ranch Fire Chief John Fink stated that this was his last opportunity to address Council prior to his retirement. He stated that it had been a pleasure to work with the various Town Councils and Town staff. He asked that Council extend their support to incoming Fire Chief Carr. PRESENTATIONS Presentation to retiring Deputy Town Clerk Roxana Garrity for her years of service to the Town of Oro Valley - March 4, 1996 - July 30, 2010 Click here for Presentation 1 Mayor Hiremath read the proclamation for retiring Deputy Town Clerk Roxana Garrity and presented her a crystal bowl for her years of service. Presentation of Awards to the Communications Division Click here for Presentation 2 Ms. Davis acknowledged all in the audience that helped earn the award. Mayor Hiremath presented the International Academy for Visual Arts 2010 Communication Award of Distinction for the Town of Oro Valley's publication, The Oro Valley Vista and the 2010 Award of Excellence for the Town's 35th Anniversary Celebration to Communications Administrator Mary Davis and Communications Specialist Kelsie Hanson. Drowning Impact Awareness Month -August 2010 Click here for Presentation 3 Mayor Hiremath read the proclamation that proclaimed the month of August as Drowning Impact Awareness month. He presented the proclamation to Officer Yolanda Hallberg of the Oro Valley Police Department and Tracy Koslowski of the Drexel Heights Fire District. CONSENT AGENDA Items C, K and O were pulled from the Consent Agenda. MOTION: A motion was made by Councilmember Snider and seconded by Vice Mayor Garner to approve the Consent Agenda less items C, K, and O. MOTION carried, 7-0. A. Minutes - April 24 & June 16, 2010 http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=968 10/26/2010 Town Council Page 3 of 13 Click here for the April 24, 2010 Minutes Click here for the June 16, 2010 Minutes B. June 2010 Building Safety Monthly Reports Click here for Item B C. Fiscal Year 2009/10 Financial Update through June 2010 (PULLED FOR DISCUSSION) Click here for Item C It was stated that there had not been any updates regarding the actions taken since the Lehman Brothers Investment Company declared bankruptcy. It was noted that the Local Government Investment Pool (LGIP) administered by the State Treasurer's office was "in line" with other creditors in an effort to recoup losses. MOTION: A motion was made by Vice Mayor Garner and seconded by Councilmember Gillaspie to approve Item C. MOTION carried, 7-0. D. Police Department May 2010 Statistics Click here for Item D E. Resolution No. (R)10 - 44 Authorizing and Approving an Intergovernmental Agreement Between the Town of Oro Valley and the Metropolitan Domestic Water Improvement District to Continue Providing Water Service to the Town's Area 2 Customers Click here for Item E F. Resolution No. (R)10 - 45 Accepting a warranty deed for the dedication of public right- of-way of certain real property from Golder Ranch Fire District located along Linda Vista Boulevard Click here for Item F G. Resolution No. (R)10 - 46 Accepting a warranty deed for the dedication of public right- of-way of certain real property from First American Title Insurance Company located along Linda Vista Boulevard Click here for Item G H. Resolution No. (R)10 - 47 Authorizing and approving the Town of Oro Valley to enter into an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with the State of Arizona, Department of Transportation (ADOT) for the State to oversee the Town's projects receiving funds under the Federal government's American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). Click here for Item H Resolution No. (R)10 - 48 Affirming the Town of Oro Valley's commitment to share in the http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=968 10/26/2010 Town Council Page 4 of 13 construction of bicycle lanes on both sides of Lambert Lane from La Cholla Boulevard to La Canada Drive, contingent upon being awarded a 2010 Round 18 Transportation Enhancement Grant in the amount of $572,007. Click here for Item I Resolution No. (R)10 - 49 Approving a Water Utility Easement Agreement between the Town of Oro Valley and Judy and Lan Lester, for the purposes of constructing a new water main and other Utility facilities on adjacent property Click here for Item J K. Resolution No. (R)10 - 50 Amending Town of Oro Valley Personnel Policies and Procedures Manual to update Policy No. 10, Attendance and Leaves, Section 10, Holidays (PULLED FOR DISCUSSION) Click here for Item K Councilmember Solomon stated that staff has had to forego raises and take on extra work as a result of the difficult economic times. He noted that during Christmas Eve and New Years Eve, the Town had little, if any, activity. He stated that adoption of this resolution was a way to compensate staff. MOTION: A motion was made by Councilmember Solmon and seconded by Councilmember Hornat to approve Item K. MOTION carried, 7-0. L. OV12-05-23C Approval of a one year time extension for the Bighorn Commerce Center development plan to July 21, 2011. Property is located on the southeast corner of Oracle Road and Rams Field Pass. (Continued from June 2, 2010) Click here for Item L M. OV12-09- 04A Approval of a Final Plat for Lot 10 of the Foothills Business Park, La Jolla Plaza located on the northeast corner of Oracle Road and Hanley Boulevard Click here for Item M N. Approving the Acceptance of a Deed from Evergreen Devco, Inc. for Open Space Land at Steam Pump Village located on the west side of Oracle Road, north of Hanley Boulevard Click here for Item N O. Approval of Employment Agreement between the Town of Oro Valley and G. Jerene Watson for appointment as Town Manager effective July 21, 2010 to July 20, 2011 (PULLED FOR DISCUSSION) Click here for Item O Councilmember Solomon stated that Council chose not to conduct a nationwide search as Ms. Watson was well qualified and established in the organization. http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=968 10/26/2010 Town Council Page 5 of 13 MOTION: A motion was made by Councilmember Solmon and seconded by Councilmember Waters to approve Item O. MOTION carried, 7-0. 2. PUBLIC HEARING - CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING AN APPLICATION FOR A SERIES 12 (RESTAURANT) LIQUOR LICENSE FOR SAN CARLOS GRILL LOCATED AT 12125 N. ORACLE ROAD, #169, Oro Valley Marketplace at the southwest corner of Tangerine and Oracle Roads Click here for Item 2 Mayor Hiremath opened the public hearing. There being no speakers, he closed the public hearing. MOTION: A motion was made by Councilmember Gillaspie and seconded by Vice Mayor Garner to approve the issuance of the Series 12 Liquor License to the Arizona State Liquor Board for Mr. Raul Garcia Cordova and principals for San Carlos Grill located at 12125 N. Oracle Road #169. MOTION carried, 7-0. PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION NO. (R) 10 - 51 GRANTING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE PANDA EXPRESS DRIVE THROUGH, LOCATED IN PROXIMITY TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ORACLE ROAD AND MAGEE ROAD ON THE CURRENT SITE OF CHURCH'S CHICKEN, OV810-004. Explanation: Cole Real Estate Investments, represented by Hollon Design Associates LLC., requests approval of a conditional use permit. Click here for Item 3 Acting Planning Manager David Williams presented the item. He stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing regarding this item and recommended the issuance of the conditional use permit. Councilmember Hornat noted it was an improvement to the site as the design was a better configuration than the previous structure. Mayor Hiremath opened the public hearing. There being no speakers, he closed the public hearing. MOTION: A motion was made by Councilmember Waters and seconded by Councilmember Hornat to adopt Resolution No. (R)l0-51 Conditional Use Permit for the Panda Express restaurant drive -through. MOTION carried, 7-0. 4. OV12-08-07 & 07A CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING A MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PHASE 1 AND 2 DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE MILLER RANCH PROJECT, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LA CANADA DRIVE AND TANGERINE ROAD. Explanation: Desco Southwest, represented by Rick Engineering Company, requests approval of a master development plan and phase 1 & 2 development plan for the Miller Ranch http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=968 10/26/2010 Town Council Page 6 of 13 development. Click here for Item 4 Acting Planning Manager David Williams presented the staff report for the Miller Ranch Master Development Plan and the development plan for Phase I and Phase II. He reviewed the General Plan and Zoning elements associated with the property: Located at the northeast corner of Tangerine Road and La Canada Drive -1/2 mile long Lower density residential to the east; low density to the west; medium density residential and a United States Post office across the street —The site has a Commerce Office Park designation as the result of a 2004 General Plan Amendment —Zoning submitted post the General Plan Amendment changed the designation to Technological Park (T-P) and R-2 Commercial district He noted the key rezoning conditions: Height restriction of 28 feet for the three northern buildings Permitted/prohibited uses within C-1 Restoration of riparian area Floor area ratio was reduced to .3 for T-P He noted that it was a five phase master plan for the 21 acre site: -5.8 acres of commercial; 15.2 acres of T-P Uses are office and office related Setbacks for 13 buildings of 3 to 1 ratio building height to setback Building heights range from 20 feet to 34 feet Mr. Williams discussed the Development Intensity: STANDARD REQUIREMENTS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT C-1 Commercial Maximum Building or 2 stories plus architectural elements by 1125' rno single story Height more than 10' Maximum Floor Area FO30 FAR Ratio .09 T-P Technical Park 20' height - Buildings 7 & 8 Maximum Building 34'; Three northern buildings maximum 28' 28' height- Buildings 11, Height (up to 32 for architectural features and 34 for 12 & 13 elevator shaft) 34' height - Buildings 5, 6, 9&10 Maximum Floor Area [0.30 .25 FAR Ratio Discussion noted the following: —Two public meetings were held Development plans were not subject to public hearings —No major changes were made as a result of the neighborhood meetings Development and Infrastructure Services Director Suzanne Smith stated that she attended http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=968 10/26/2010 Town Council Page 7 of 13 the neighborhood meetings. She explained that story poles and screening from car lights were requested in addition to foliage added to the median to negate the glare of car lights. She stated that the Town was working with developer regarding these requests. She noted that the ordinance for public participation was implemented 1 1/2 years after the first submittal and therefore did not apply. It was noted that: —The story poles were black and difficult to see *Strong winds may have knocked the poles down Plants in the median will diffuse glare for neighbors to the east Although the Town's new landscape conservation code called for drought resistant plants, the Town has typically used foliage for aesthetics —The ordinance regarding public participation was not in effect prior to plan submittal *The Town conducted two neighborhood meetings though not required by ordinance at the time Mayor Hiremath asked Michael Serabia of Desco Southwest to address the story poles issue. Mr. Serabia stated that there had been a great deal of difficulty putting up the poles due to the wind. He noted that a 34 foot pole had to be ordered from a national pole maker as it was not carried locally. It was noted that story poles do not give an accurate representation of the surrounding vegetation. Mayor Hiremath opened the floor for public comment. Oro Valley resident Bill Adler disagreed that the ordinance did not apply to the development plan. He stated that a mistake was made. He noted that material was neither displayed nor explained and questions were not answered. He appealed to Council to reaffirm and apply the ordinance and give the neighbors the opportunity to speak. Oro Valley resident Cheryl Saul stated that, in 2004, the neighborhood meetings had been conducted with the home builder, Sterling. She noted that home buyers were told that commercial buildings were coming but would be one story only. She explained that people were not always able to attend the meetings with one week's notice. She stated that during the two most recent meetings, neighbors did speak, but did not feel their cosmetic requests were heard. She requested that approval of the project be made with the following conditions: Maintain a height maximum of 28 feet —Reduce lighting structures to 15 feet in height Rearrange buildings to reduce the "massive" look of the site Oro Valley resident Rosemary Figueroa stated that the story poles were not visible from her property. She explained that the intended purpose for the poles had failed and she was not able to objectively observe the poles. Oro Valley resident Adelina Kempner asked if Acting Planning Manager David Williams would be available for future meetings. She noted that she had attended the neighborhood meeting with AF Sterling in 2004, but had not received any notices since. She asked Council to remove architectural features on top of the buildings in the technological industrial park as the commercial height of 28 feet was massive compared to the residential height of 18 feet. She further requested that Council enforce that assurances for the site would be received and approved prior to development. http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=968 10/26/2010 Town Council Page 8 of 13 Non-resident Chuck Boreson waived his opportunity to speak stating he would attend meetings for Phases 3 and 4. It was noted that: —The only portions of the property that may be graded were those that had an approved development plan Some site utilities to serve Phases I and II would need to be installed *This will disturb the site initially but will be restored —The applicant agreed, at the second neighborhood meeting, to reduce the lighting to the lowest level possible while ensuring public safety The applicant stated that he would have a lighting consultant review the plan to meet the Town's ordinance. He stated that the poles would be reduced to fifteen feet and in some areas twelve or thirteen feet, however it was a safety issue. It was explained that "assurances" meant bonding; monetary promises the developer files with the Town should the developer cease to restore the site, the bond money would be used to restore the site should the developer renege. MOTION: A motion was made by Councilmember Hornat and seconded by Councilmember Waters to approve OV12-08-07 and 07A, master development plan and Phase I and II development for the Miller Ranch Project, located on the northwest corner of La Canada Drive and Tangerine Road with the condition in Exhibit A: 1. Revise the master development plan and Phase I and II development plan to specifiy a maximum building height of 20 feet (single story) for buildings #7 and #8. Revise the general notes and all applicable sheets accordingly. MOTION carried, 7-0. Mayor Hiremath recessed the meeting at 7:40 p.m. The meeting resumed at 7:51 p.m. 8. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING TEMPORARY RELIEF GUIDELINES FOR ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED, SECTION 28 Click here for Item 8 Economic Development Manager Amanda Jacobs noted that there was some confusion in the community regarding this item. She stated that the Sign Code Task Force met last November regarding permanent changes to the Sign Code which will not be ready until September 2010. She explained that this item regarded temporary sign relief. Ms. Jacobs explained that the Cities of Chandler and Tempe had implemented such relief programs and had been very successful. She stated that staff met with several businesses to garner requests and that the requests varied. She noted that staff supported the business community's desire to grant relief for seven months beginning in August 2010 through February 2011. She explained that this period would see businesses through the holiday season and that during month six, a report would be brought to Council with the possibility of extending the relief another six months. Ms. Jacobs reviewed the elements of the program: Business owners could fill out Hardship Waiver forms *A solution to the economic hardship could be offered -Staff would evaluate and approve/deny the proposed solution http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=968 10/26/2010 Town Council Page 9 of 13 -A $50 fee would be assessed to offset the cost of processing the application Applicant must show within 90 days any improvement resulting from the temporary signage Temporary signage must not be illuminated, noise producing or flashing It was noted that Ms. Jacobs would visit with businesses that apply for the waiver, to gather information to ascertain the success of the program. Vice Mayor Garner stated that this had not been vetted properly through Planning and Zoning. He noted that there was not an ordinance to address this and not all businesses were allowed to take advantage of this program. Councilmember Snider stated that if business owners thought it would help, that it should be allowed. She explained that there were many factors that could affect the outcome and to exercise caution when drawing conclusions in six months. It was noted that this allowance would supersede the Zoning Code temporarily to provide relief. Councilmember Hornat stated that this was temporary relief for temporary signs. He noted that placing signs in the right-of-way was not a consideration. He stated that a landlord may not allow that, however it would be up to the tenants to petition the landlord. Councilmember Gillaspie stated that he wanted to support this, however he was concerned about the process and the lack of measures to protect staff. Acting Planning Manager David Williams requested that Council address the following: Whether to limit temporary sign types only Whether to disallow the relief to occur in the public right-of-way Should the fees to run the program be recovered Should the Town underwrite the cost to run the program Mayor Hiremath opened the floor for public comment. Oro Valley resident Bill Adler stated that the way to evaluate advertising was based on results and to place that responsibility on the business owner. He suggested that with this experiment, the Town could learn which signs performed well. He noted that this could help the community as well as the Town with the sign code. Oro Valley resident Zev Cywan stated that he was a member of the task force and that in mid September there would be a presentation for a permanent sign code. He noted that Council could take what is proposed and use it as a litmus test. Oro Valley business owner Bonnie Quinn stated that she had been impacted by the economy and the construction on Oracle Road. She stated that she placed a sign on the road and doubled her business that weekend. She explained that she purposely violated the sign code in order to pay her employees. She noted that she put the sign out during daytime business hours and that it was removable and could be managed responsibly. She stated that she advertised on the radio and in the newspaper. She asked for flexibility and stated that each owner knew what worked best for their business. Elizabeth Alvarez represented the Kitt Peak Observatory. She thanked Oro Valley for the effort to find workable solutions which has allowed the astronomy industry to flourish. Oro Valley business owner Eric Sheffield stated that he would honor respectfully the http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=968 10/26/2010 Town Council Page 10 of 13 temporary sign code and appreciated the opportunity. Ramon Gaanderse, President and CEO of the Northern Pima County Chamber of Commerce (NPCCC) stated that the NPCCC largely represented small businesses in the community. He stated that it was important for businesses to have the flexibility to tell the Town what they needed. Mr. Gaanderse offered the NPCCC's services to the Town to help spread the word to businesses. He recommended that the Town conduct another survey to garner input from the community as a whole. He suggested that the Master Sign Code Program should apply to all businesses. Mayor Hiremath stated that businesses were struggling and that it was incumbent on the community to come together and help those that were struggling. He requested that Ms. Jacobs and Development and Infrastructure Services meet with Mr. Adler, Mr. Cywan and Mr. Gaanderse as they all had strong points and the NPCCC could be an extension for the town. He noted that everyone had a piece of the solution. Vice Mayor Garner reiterated that an ordinance did not exist for this. Councilmember Solomon stated that this was a waiver to the details in the ordinance and that it was important to support the business community as they provided jobs and services close to home and sales taxes that fund Town services. MOTION: A motion was made by Mayor Hiremath and seconded by Councilmember Snider to authorize the Town's Development and Infrastructure Service's department to approve temporary relief from Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised Section 28.6 and 28.7, Temporary Signs, for the period of August 2, 2010 through February 1, 2011 for businesses that can demonstrate reasons constituting a hardship that would justify such relief. The following conditions shall apply to such relief: . All applicants, either individual businesses or holders of Master Sign plans shall complete an "Economic Hardship Sign Waiver Form," which will be reviewed by the Development and Infrastructure Services Department. . To assist the Town of Oro Valley in determining if the temporary sign relief is effective, the businesses that are granted relief must provide the Town with data measuring the company's performance within 90 days of the waiver. . A $50 fee to offset the cost of processing the applications shall apply. . Town staff shall have the right to reject, modify or condition any application approval in order to preserve public health or safety, and to revoke any approval at the discretion of the Director of the Town's Development and Infrastructure Services Department. . No temporary signs shall be illuminated, noise producing or flashing. . The signs must be limited to the hours of the business operation. Councilmember Hornat acknowledged the importance of Kitt Peak to the Town. He noted that business owners knew best how to run their business. Councilmember Gillaspie stated his support and noted that this was important to try to balance and monitor. Councilmember Waters stated that this was a win -win for the community as the community came together to solve the problem. He noted his appreciation for the contributions made this evening. Councilmember Snider stated that this effort was a partnership. She noted that if the Town did not have a property tax then the Town must have sales tax. She stated that it was http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=968 10/26/2010 Town Council Page 11 of 13 important for citizens to patronize the Town's businesses. MOTION carried, 6-1 with Vice Mayor Garner opposed. 5. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING PARTICIPATION IN THE ARIZONA CENTENNIAL CELEBRATION Click here for Item 5 Communications Administrator Mary Davis presented the item. She stated that a temporary design theme had been drafted and reviewed the committee members representing the Towns of Marana and Oro Valley. She noted that the list did not include media partners. She also presented the timeline that included: Filing paperwork with the State Planning the event Implementing the school program in the Amphitheater and Marana school districts -The Town of Marana's Founders' Day -A Northwest Scavenger Hunt Centennial event in Oro Valley at Steam Pump Ranch Ms. Davis reviewed the budget for the event: -$5,000 - $7,500 *The Town's 35th Anniversary at Steam Pump Ranch budget was $7,500; sponsorships reduced the cost to $2,500 -Alphagraphics would be the print sponsor -The Town of Marana had funds for Founders' Day and a contribution to the education program Discussion noted the following: Funds could come from items that were removed from the budget *The event could also be budgeted for in the next fiscal year Awaiting confirmation from the Southern Arizona Arts and Cultural Alliance (SAACA) regarding their participation in the event -The paperwork must be submitted by September 1, 2010 MOTION: A motion was made by Councilmember Gillaspie and seconded by Councilmember Hornat to approve the proposal for the Town's participation in the Arizona Centennial Celebration. MOTION carried, 7-0. 6. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COMMUNICATIONS PLAN Click here for Item 6 Communications Administrator Mary Davis presented the updated Communications Plan, responsibilities'and goals. She explained that the Communications department had an annual budget of $22,000 to cover costs for the website, public outreach, media relations and printed materials. It was noted that: -The website was the primary source of information http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=968 10/26/2010 Town Council Page 12 of 13 `Social media was laced with links that drive the user back to the website -The Town used the Twitter account to update the media *The Town has 250 followers on Twitter It was suggested that Council on Your Corner be broadcast and have a time to email or call councilmembers. It was further suggested that the video could be available online as a way to improve the effectiveness of Council on Your Corner. It was explained that the technology is in place, however, the Town lacked video equipment and resources. It was also noted that the Town had a YouTube account. Councilmembers suggested the following: -Place a postcard survey in with the water bill Post a topic online and take emails from citizens to answer during Council meetings when the public is watching the meeting on Granicus -One of the survey questions should be "No, I don't want to be contacted." Ms. Davis stated that she could have a proof of the survey for Council to review for the September 1, 2010 meeting. 7. INFORMATION ON RESTRUCTURING OF THE CITIZEN PLANNING INSTITUTE PROGRAM AND CURRICULUM Click here for Item 7 Acting Planning Manager David Williams presented the item. He reviewed the core curriculum for the Citizen Academy (CA): Required for all CA participants Consisted of six classes 1. Introduction: Town History, Organization and Staffs Role 2. Local Government and the Law 3. The General Plan and Strategic Plan 4. Sustainability and Smart Growth 5. How to Make Your Voice Heard 6. Roles and Duties of Board/Commission Members and How Meetings Are Run He stated that the second branch had a specialized curriculum for a commission. The CA Specialized Institutes addressed: Specific needs for each board/commission Classes were organized and conducted by the department supporting the board or commission Example *Planning and Zoning Commission curriculum: 1. Zoning History and Principles 2. Principles and Process of Rezoning 3. Land Development Process 4. Zoning Code Review 5. Project Site Visits Councilmembers discussed the following: Would like the course to show examples of how to reach conclusions *The chair and liaison should participate in the class -The ability to study specific was a good option Case studies would be very helpful hUP:Horovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=968 10/26/2010 Town Council Page 13 of 13 —The Town's objective was to have a core set of classes and then specialized classes Other municipalities send their commissioners elsewhere for training *The town was unique in that it ran and operated the Citizens Planning Institute Mayor Hiremath opened the floor for public comment. Oro Valley resident Bill Adler stated that citizens were interested in how decisions were made and in understanding the criteria. He suggested that emphasis on speakers that understand the Town's processes was needed. He recommended role playing to help participants. 9. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Vice Mayor Garner requested that a sample post card for a community survey be brought forward at the September 1, 2010 Council meeting. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Gillaspie. Councilmember Solomon requested a study session for September 8, 2010 to discuss the Sign Code Committee report and the Naranja Town Site Park report and to leave the two items on the September 15, 2010 regular session for possible action. The request was seconded by Vice Mayor Garner. Council agreed to move the Public Participation item from the September 8, 2010 study session to the September 22, 2010 study session. CALL TO AUDIENCE Oro Valley resident Adelina Kempner expressed her concern that the Town may be collecting sales taxes for the installation of solar panels illegally. She stated that rebates should be. issued if her statement was correct. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: A motion was made by Councilmember Waters and seconded by Councilmember Snider to adjourn the meeting at 9:34 p.m. MOTION carried, 7-0. http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=968 10/26/2010 Item #: 4. TC Regular Session Date: 07/21/2010 Submitted By: David Ronquillo, Planning and Zoning Department: Planning and Zoning Information SUBJECT: OV12-08-07 & 07A CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING A MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PHASE 1 AND 2 DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE MILLER RANCH PROJECT, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LA CANADA DRIVE AND TANGERINE ROAD. Explanation: Desco Southwest, represented by Rick Engineering Company, requests approval of a master development plan and phase 1 & 2 development plan for the Miller Ranch development. SUMMARY: The project will consist of five phases with thirteen (13) buildings totaling 189,866 square.feet. There are two zoning designations on the site: C-1, Commercial and T-P, Technological Park. Phases 1 and 2 will include buildings 1 through 8 and will provide bank, restaurant and office related uses. The remainder of the site, Phases 3, 4 and 5, will provide an office park with primarily medical and professional office uses. The project will be developed in phases; therefore, a master development plan was required. In the future, a separate development plan must be submitted for each subsequent phase and subject to required Town approvals. As part of this proposal, the applicant has submitted plans for Phases 1 and 2. Proposed Improvements • Vehicular parking, passenger drop off, and loading zones • Transit station and car pool spaces • Pedestrian and courtyard areas • Restoration of wash along the western edge of property • One access point off Tangerine Road, three access points off La Canada, and a future connection to the west (crossing the wash) • Building heights range from 20-34 feet with additional height as permitted for architectural elements and elevator shafts DISCUSSION: The site is relatively flat and slopes gradually to the west (adjacent to the wash area). A total of 13 buildings are proposed and vary in height. Buildings 1 through 4 (25' high) and 7 and 8 (20' high) will be single story; the remaining buildings will be two story and 34 foot high (Buildings 5, 6, 9 & 10) or 28 foot (Buildings 11 through 13). The site is arranged in a manner to break up the building mass with the parking distributed to the side and rear of the buildings. This plan is in conformance with applicable General Plan policies, Oro Valley Zoning Code requirements, and the Rezoning Condtions. Site Conditions Property is 20.97 acres • Zoning is C-1, Commercial District and T-P, Technological Park District • Site is vacant and undeveloped with the exception of several areas that have been previously graded • Residential uses to the west (across the wash - zoning is 131-144), east (across La Canada Drive - zoning is R1-36), south (across Tangerine Road -zoning is R1-7) and north (across Sunkist Road - zoning is SR, Pima County) • Western boundary of property designated as "Significant Resource Area" in the General Plan Approvals To Date • October 2004: General Plan Amendment approved by Town Council • February 2007: Rezoning (R1-144 to C-1 and T-P) approved by Town Council • May 2010: Conditional use permit for the bank drive through area (phase 1) approved by Town Council • May 2010: Master development plan, phase 1 and 2 development plan, master landscape plan and phase 1 and 2 landscape plan approved by Development Review Board Public Notification and Comment All surrounding property owners were notified of the public meeting in accordance with Town requirements. Recently, there have been numerous neighbor concerns. Please see Exhibit B regarding the neighborhood meeting comments. Exhibit E inlcudes information on project chronology and neighborhood meeting dates. Public Works Comments Drainage: Existing stormwater runoff drains across the site in a northeast to southwest direction. The stormwater is conveyed predominately by natural swales and overland sheet flow, ultimately discharging into an existing wash that runs along the west side of the project. The portion of existing wash that abutts the property will be restored as a part of this project in accordance with the rezoning conditions to create a natural riparian habitat to mimic the pre -disturbed condition. The post developed stormwater will be discharged and released from the project site in a way that mimics existing conditions. The on -site runoff will be conveyed across the site through a combination of catch basins, curb openings, culverts, swales, constructed channels, and surface flow. Eight detention basins will attenuate the stormwater discharge so that there is no increase in peak flow or negative impacts to the downstream areas. First flush treatment is incorporated into this project and consists of filter inserts placed within catch basins. The first flush filters are designed to capture sediment, debris, trash, oils, and grease from parking lots and access lanes. In accordance with the rezoning conditions, restoration of the entire wash abutting the length of the west property line will be a part of this project. Grading: A Type 2 Grading Permit will be required to construct building pads, drainage structures, utilities, parking lots, and any other structures requiring grading on the project site. The grading represented within the Master Development Plan and Phase 1 Development Plan conforms to the requirements of chapter 27.9 of the Town's Zoning Code as well as the stipulations and development criteria of the Town's Subdivision Street Standards. Traffic: A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was created for this project to analyze the placement and dedicated turn lane requirements for the access driveways to be constructed during Phases 1 and 2 of the project. A total of four access driveways will be constructed to help distribute internal traffic and create an acceptable level of service for the project as a whole. Phase 1 will incorporate two access driveways; one along Tangerine Road and the second being the southernmost entrance along La Canada Boulevard. A westbound deceleration/right-turn lane into the development along Tangerine Road will be constructed as recommended by the TIA. The southernmost driveway along La Canada Boulevard will be a controlled access intersection for right -in and right -out traffic movements only. A Tangerine Corridor Overlay District arterial frontage tract reduction was permitted for this driveway. The location of the driveway and requested tract reduction were approved by the Town Engineer in accordance with chapter 24.1 of the Town's Zoning Code. Phase 2 will include a third driveway access, located near the middle of the project along La Canada Boulevard. An existing median opening with left -turn pocket for access into the development already exists at this location. This intersection will be a full access intersection with no additional improvements recommended by the TIA. Future Phase 3 will incorporate a fourth driveway for access into the northern portion of the development. This northernmost driveway along La Canada Boulevard will be a controlled access intersection for right -in and right out traffic movements only. All the above mentioned improvements identified within the Master Development Plan and TIA shall be the responsibility of the developer. All improvements and construction within the public right-of-way shall require a permit issued from the Town Engineer's office. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Board recommended approval (6 - 0) on May 11, 2010. The plan is in conformance with applicable General Plan policies, OVZCR requirements and rezoning conditions. Staff recommends approval of this application subject to the conditions in Exhibit A. SUGGESTED MOTION: The Town Council may wish to consider one of the following suggested motions: I move to [approve, approve with conditions, OR deny] OV12-08-07 & 07A, master development plan and Phase 1 & 2 development plan for the Miller Ranch Development subject to the condition in Exhibit A. Attachments Exhibit A OV1208-07 & 07A Miller Ranch Development July 21, 2010 1. Revise the master development plan and phase 1 & 2 development plan to specify a maximum building height of 20 feet (single story) for buildings #7 and 48. Revise the general notes and all applicable sheets accordingly. Exhibit B OV1208-07 & 07A, Miller Ranch Development Proiect Chronology 2004 - General Plan Amendment from RLDR to Commerce Park May 2004 Neighborhood meeting September 2004 Commission recommended approval October 2004 Town Council approved 2006/07 - Rezoning from R1-144 to C-1 and T-P October 2006 Neighborhood meeting for rezoning December 2006 Applicant surveyed building heights for neighbors December 2006 Commission recommended approval January 2007 Applicant worked with neighbors on building heights February 2007 Town Council approval 2008/09/10 - Master Development Plan and DP Phase 1 and 2 June 2008 - First submittal (Pre -Application) • General site layout issues (access, parking, circulation etc) • Addressing rezoning conditions. September 2008 - Second Submittal (Formal Application) • Location of zoning boundary • Building setbacks • Comprehensive list of zoning code requirements relating to DP and LP December 2008 - Third Submittal • Relocation of northern most access • Building setbacks • Lot splitting/preliminary plat • Details of wash restoration plan March 2009 — Fourth Submittal • Rezoning of wash related to building setbacks December 2009 — Fifth Submittal Conditional use permit for bank — new addition Building setbacks Discrepancy of building heights May 2010 — Sixth submittal • All zoning code items addressed — may proceed to DRB with conditions • DRB approval with technical conditions June 2010 — Two neighborhood meetings held 2009 Rezoning from R1-144 (wash area only) to Open Space February 2009 Commission recommended approval April 2009 Town Council denied 2010 Conditional Use Permit (bank drive through) April 2010 Commission recommended approval May 2010 Town Council approved Exhibit C OV1208-07 & 07A, Miller Ranch Development Project Fact Sheet Overview • 20.97 acres - total site area • Zoning is C-1, Commercial (5.8 acres) and T-P, Technological Park (15.7 acres) • Uses proposed: retail, restaurant and bank within commercial area and medical/professional office uses within T-P area • 13 buildings totaling 189,866 square feet • Development to be built in phases - Phase 1 (building 1-4) - Phase 2 (buildings 5-8) - Phase 3 (buildings 9-10) - Phase 4 (building 11) - Phase 5 (building 12 & 13) • Building floor area ratio: required is .30; proposed is .21 • Maximum building heights per buildings: - Buildings # 1 — #4: 25 ft. (architectural elements may be permitted up to 10 feet above this height) - Buildings #5, #6, #9 and #10: 34 ft. (including architecture elements) - Buildings #7 and #8: 20 ft. (34 ft. allowed per zoning code) - Buildings #11 — #13: 28 ft. (with the exception of architectural elements, which are allowed up to 32 ft. and appurtenances for the elevator shaft are allowed up to 34 ft.) • The changes to the plan made in response to the neighborhood concerns were specified as part of the rezoning conditions and include: - Revision of C-1 building floor area ratio to what is allowed in T-P - Restricted building heights on the northern three buildings - Restrictions on permitted uses in the C-1 portion - Restoration of wash to provide buffer Miller Ranch Development OV1208-07 & 07A 22-Jun-10 Exhibit D Zoning Code Requirements Proposed Development C-1 Commercial Minimum Property Size 5 acres 5.89 acres Yard Setbacks feet Front 20' (where adjacent to a residential 70' setback - Building 1 district, the front setback regulations 150' setback - Building 4 of the residential district apply R1- 144 = 50') Side 50' or 3:1 (setback to building N/A (lot abuts T-P to north) height) whichever is greater 25' bldg height = 75' setback Rear 50' or 3:1 (setback to building 90' to west (abutting wash) height) whichever is greater 25' bldg height = 75' setback _ Maximum Building Height 25' or 2 stories plus architectural 25' single story elements by no more than 10' Minimum Open Space 20% 20% Maximum Floor Area Ratio 0.3 (Rezoning Condition increased 24,000 s.f. builidng = .09 FAR to T-P allowed to .50 FAR = 128,264 s.f. bldg) Floor Area Limits < 60,000 s.f. per ea. business 9,000 sf is the largest building Tangerine Corridor Overlay 25' tract (open space) 25' No buildingover ver 25' height with 100' No building over 25' T-P Technical Park Minimum Property Size 3 acres 15.08 acres Yard Setbacks (feet) Front 3:1, 25' height bldg or less a 2:1 is 40' setback - Bldg 7 & 8 permitted 100' setback - Bldg 9 - 13 160' setback - Bldg 6 _ Side 50' or a 3:1 (setback to builidng N/A (lot abuts C-1 to south) height) whichever is greater Rear 50' or 3:1 whichever is greater 100' to west (abutting wash Maximum Building Height 34' (Rezoning condition requires 20' height- Bldg 7 & 8 the 3 northern bldg max 28' hieght 28' height - Bldg 11, 12 & 13 with 34' for elevator shaft and up to 34' height - Bldg 5, 6, 9 & 10 32' for architectural features Minimum Open Space 25% 25% Maximum Floor Area Ratio 0.50 165,866 s.f. ttl building = 0.25 FAR Retail Sales Allowed as an ancillary use directly N/A related & contained within the structure of the primary use Floor Area Limits < 5,000 gross floor area ancillary N/A use < 15,000 gross floor area of any one N/A structure on lots less than 10 gross acres Rezoning Condition Wash Restoration (7.7 Ac) Required per rezoning condition Condition met/exceeded Providing 318 trees and 1,070 shrubs Neighborhood Meetings Summary Miller Ranch Development OV1208-07 & 07A Exhibit E NEIGHBORHOOD CONCERNS MITIGATION RESPONSE 1 Building height (request for storey poles). Rezoning conditions and setback requirements have already addressed building heights. C-1 Zoning: Buildings 1-4 are 25' high (one story). T-P Zoning: Buildings 7 and 8 are 20' high (one story). Buildings 5, 6, 9, 10 are 34' (two stories) and Buildings 11-13 are 28" (two stories) per rezoning conditions. The applicant will provide poles on site prior to the council meeting. 2 Building massing. Number of buildings have been significantly reduced from the initial concept, creating a greater expanse of view corridors between buildings. Overall site Floor Area Ratio is .21 while code allows .50. 3 Types of permitted uses and compatibility The rezoning conditions have further limited the uses with residential neighbors. allowed on the property and are specified as general notes on the development plan. 4 They were originally promised a single story The Town has no record of such an agreement commercial development. 5 Limit the amount of architectural elements. There is no design for the buildngs at this stage. The design for the building will be submitted for review/approval to the Development Review Board. Architectural elements add to the visual aesthetics and overall interest of the buildings, rather than creating a plain box, in keeping with the Town's design guidelines. 6 Hours of operation for the center as well as The hours of the operations will depend on the business, deliveries and service vehicles. which are not known at this time. Deliveries and service vehicles will be directed to the western loop road where the loading areas and screened dumpster areas are contained. 7 Wildlife will be impacted. This project will actually enhance the wildlife of the area by restoring the wash on west side of property 8 Increased traffic. A traffic impact study was completed and reviewed and approved by the Town Engineer. All safety concerns have been addressed. 9 Vehicle lights/glare shining to homes across There is a 500' to 900' distance to the homes to the east La Canada. with a planted median and open space area between them. In addition, the applicant will work with Town to provide additional landscaping (if possible) within the La Canada right of way. 10 Parking lot light pole height (request 12' Lighting will meet zoning code requirements, which includes height). shielded lights. Applicant will balance site safety with minimizing pole height. 11 The homes to the east on Washbed Drive Tthe majority of development will be lower in grade, are lower in grade than the proposed site. specifically northern portion. 12 No outside speakers (e.g. piped music). No outdoor speakers provided. GENERAL NOTES L FASTING ZONING IS C-1 CDw ClAL OSTHICTI AM IF rtFINNODLICAL PARRI L TIE BASIS OF BEARINGS FDR THIS PROUECT 15 CEOOETIC WIN NNICN ESTABLISHES A IF/AIHO FROM THE GLO NCLASS DISC AT 1K USE 0007" CORER OF SU71M 34 TO THE FEW DLSG AT THE N7OL¢CTIM OF IK CMTU LIFE M TANCENINE ROAD AM TIME SC UMERLT PRELOEATIM OF NNE EAST LIFE OF 1K SOInHELST NARTM OF SAID w 34 BENC It FEET SOUTH OF THE UNNONYN = SOIIIKAST IGN EA OF SAFE SECTION 341 SOUTH arnaEAST. I BASIS OF [IEVATIW FOR TARS PROJECT I3 A % INN REBAR AT THE SORNIMI CORDER OF THE INTERSECTION OF LA CANADA MINE ID AND TMGEFUNE ROAO.00'MIND K IMF WAR BM; AT SIAM N9 &TS - MST LEFT P" TM OF MO VALLEY PLAN Of Ll CYYDA MINE PROIECT w 30 04105 ZLEIEVATION TONG 279136 WAVDAI DATUM 4. OEVFLOPEA 1101. MVEHNIT TO CHILD TOM OF ORD VALLEY, AS SEICCESSORS NOT ASSIGNS NARu r<i IN THE EVENT DF ri000NC MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR MILLER RANCH GENERAL NOTES - CONTINUED OV12-08-07 27. TEMPORARY STKET SIM SXNL BE INSIALLU AT EACH STREET DITENSCLTION WHEN CONSniO11011 OF NEW 1W ADwTS AL On PASSAGE OF WHICIES ALL STR¢TIAB VEER [ONs1HUC11DX SMALL BE CLEAR1.1 XCEMIFIED MI. AM/lVROVED NODIESS NOTES AND CALCULATIONS - CONTINUED 2M THE PYIAIE AM LOmNY SPACE MOVIOED MINN DE YAS7131 OEVOCPIONT RAN. AS RECUCTU N TK SPACES PROVETO WITIYH NEMOUAL LOTS NO WITHIN GOWN YEAS, SHALL AEET THE FAILING AND LOADING ZONE AEONREYDrtS OF "AFTER 27 OP MIR FM TK USES "A M THE FLYL AS TK IgENCE. L .15 ANNE ¢VELWED PER AN APPROVED 5. MABN¢ NILL NOT 5E ALTERm, INSTURBID M OPSTR¢TED ATNOUIT THE APPROVAL OF DEVOl� NENt RAK THE OUST" DEVELOPKNT RM SYLL K YERDED YO APSIED. AS THE IRO VALLEY IOW. COUI[L APPROPRIATE. TO IETLECT THE WILD -CUT OF IIE PROECI OVER TUE AM U" (IMAT101 SMLL FEET THE PROY15106 IF CHAPTER 27. M 1K APRICART SR/LL FELLOW THE STANTARD PPoCOD FOR S[ELWE NO JUSTIFYING A VARIANCE. 6, A[[ESS ACROSS FLOOD PRIME AREAS TO 50009E SOU WILL BE APPROVED 21 THE TOWN E9ICINEEN YO SHALL BE THE RESPo. fLU1 W THE OEVELWER n THE OBIERIOEVOOP" SHALL BE RESPOKIBLE iM ULCUTRa Q OF THE CONS] TM 7. MVQWWM7 PLACE 6 NILL BE SUMVIIIED FM COMMERCIAL LOTS M PADS PRIM TO THE COST TO PROv01E FOOPIC FOR PIIRLK 01. ISSUANCE OF ANY FERMIS EST TVE TOWN ENGINEER WHOM BUILDING OFFICIAL 30. THE RENKIT OEF-STE PUBLIC SNDTART SEIYER LINE BE RESIDED M0 CONSTRUCTED TO M 11112411 SPEED EL R MPIL.DESiw VMME IS SU-3D. PINA COWTV WASTEWATER MANIAMADD DWARIMENT S7AtENEi S. APRMVEO INPROVEMF7IT PLANS AM APPROVED ASSURANCES WILL BE ROMIED PRIOR W NOTES AND CALCULATIONS ISSUANCE OF CERIUM PERMTS 1. 1K 0055 ANIA OF THIS DOQMKm Is: 917.161 SF M 2D.97 AC O. tK WATER DISTRICT FOR THIS 0EWUPWNT 5 THE OM IN EI HIM UTILITY [OMPAMY. MET allILDIM ARIA 15: 1e9,066 BONAFE FEET. BB" HAS BEEN DISINAIFD AS HAVING AN ASSMEO 100 YEAR "TEA SUPPLY BY THE DAEciM W NAM RESOUROES 2. 1L THE SERA¢ FERN THIS MWLOPIEN7 WELL FLOW MI. IK SPICE SYSTM WERAIED .1 PIMA COUNTY MCINLL WASTEWATER RF➢lAMA1MN IVSTNC7. 1K PROJECT VIAL SE COWECTED TO THE EXISTDE L•YMER MAIN IN TAROERIK BUD, M THE N-SFK SAIDTARY SEMOIS, EXCEPT MUC SEAM M. PUBLIC SEMI" EASEJENTS M RICNIS-OF-WAT.BILL BE PRIVATE MY ELECT DE WWStM¢Im.ORAaTEO CIO MONINIBD N A } PRIVATE BASISYE IN ACCORDANCE WIN AN APPROVED OPERATOR NO MAMiFIWICC PI IF REOUDEI THE L¢MND AnAME1N10 OF CONFECTION TO AN [RISING PLMK SAIDM TT SEW" as YAdCY TO KVIM NET APPILOVN BY THE PHIL EONT1 REGIQNL BASMITD RECWUTIM TEPARICH NT. 4' a INS MOER WAS 0 COSTIVE; ARE IOW PROPOSID MASTUATU FUTURE OMIT EQUIVALENTS. PER TABLE CLASSEROIN PIW COIINiT CEDE 13,20. 3 IOU ANT RASTENATw EIS[ . VICE THE FKLSC sN4TAA1' SEOOGE STSIN SHALL AEF1 7K REDOINOADTS OF 7K INDUSTRIAL WASTE OOBWICE PIMA CO RTI CREINYIC[ NO B9R MM AIEMEDL 6 A PROJECT CONSTRUCIHIN PERMIT WOI BE SECURED FRDN PIMA COUNTY RECI"AL IASTEWAIU IENNAnw DEPARIIERT BUSE K.OwNC AM AW M THIS FRWA-. W MARY CIRCE AM OPO4TM Of THE PRIVATE SNUTARY SENTA TO ITS PoINI OF CINKCTIOII TO THE PUBLIC SEW" 15 THE RESP HEM7Y OF THE MOPERTY 0.0 M WSINESS OWNER'S ASSOCIATIOL 17. MATERIALS WORN SECRET VISIBILITY TRIMCLES SHALL ¢ PLIEM SO AS NOT 10 NIEILFFRE WIN A VISIBILITY RYE OESCRDED al TWO UNIFORM LINES LOCATED SO INCHES NO 72 BONES MOVE IIRSEEM MADE OF THE ROAUWAT SURFACE. Id OMINACERAYS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED ACCOOING TO APPRWm PLANS PRIM TO HE ISSUANCE OF AIO PEINOT FROM THE IOWN EACIKCR AND/" B METICE OFFICIAL FEW PROPOSED USE: NEDICIL A FR¢ESSIOU OFFICES. BAND RESTAURANT A RETAIL ¢CUPANCT MDIF: 'B' IVPE ¢ MMUCTION: 11-6 a" RETAIL AREA OF WEN SPACE I 49.906 S YIN FM G1 A 144.226 S .1. FM W PERCENT OF WEN SPACEI 2OC FM C-1 a 25C FOR TP BUILDIN] YEA: 1ST TL ING R I.T. eNL01N[ L /.20o SP -_-. 4.200 S BRIM BNILD I" 2 5.000 S -_- 9.030 $F RETAILAESTAURANI sulw" 3 6.OU0 S _-__ 6,CM SF RTAIURE"'W"I /WILDING I 4.Ww IF 4.600 Sr RETAIL/RCSTAO'RNIf BUILD 1' 5 ".4w S 16.2W S 3Z.E0O S OFFICE IMILOIRL 6 11.21. S 11.250 S 22.5. BY OFFICE BUR0I MG 7 IUILDINC a "100 S i. AOO SEF -_ 6,400 S i./00 SF OFFICE OFFICE IU TIDING 9 10.000 S 10.000 S SO. MD Si OFil[E IUIl01NC 10 10.00E Sr 10.000 SF 1C.M0 SF OFFICE w LET a W Il01NG 12 l.Teo s IO.aN IF T,wO s 1.1109 noeD st I1.e0/ Si OFF'¢ OFF'¢ WIL01N0 13 IZ.111 IF 1D.500 So,lide2 Y OFI10E TOTAL I""'I SF . T2.135 SF • 1as, 6 AT TOTAL GROSS FLOM YEA • 189.a66 IF REWIRED/ALLOCEU PROPOSED 1NI5 PMACT. 5- 111 AM FAD: FAR: 0.30 M A 0L6RESS 01REA5 ASSOCIATION! WILL BE FORMED 70 ACCEPT RESPONSIBOITT FOR MAINTENANCE.LDNTRCLSARTY AMI LIABILITY OF PRIVIIE DHa1MAGl RAYS.NN-E MILDHE NEIONT NMI, 25- SUE for C-1 EASIJIEACIS. MUM AREAS AID PRIVATE SEEMS. M NAN IN li ANT 20. RELOCATICIL NDDDIU710N ETC.OF Orl$I ND UTNJTIE ARm/M Pla LYF'RWEMM1s�-_� ---ASS I1-17 BILL 0E it' Wi EXCEPT 2SUB BLW11-77 N iW lxE FELLOCIO: NECESSITATED BY THE PROPOSED DMELOwNt BUi BE AT N i TO FREE PUBLIC. AFPIIECTIIRAL LIMITS 22' xAC IOPERSE _.'fili - ,TIATll SxNi FLFIENIS 71' SUN 2t THE FOLLOWS; O FOLLOWTLITHES BULL PROVIDE SERVICE TO THIS OE1lV.ROPLIIXI, , _ SFTBN[4 ' W QECIRIC 1¢SN EIECTNIC PoIfA [OVARY - NM1N:'J sMAISr MACESO' FEE C45 SdI1HKST CAS [CIPMT _ OI RAT" MO VALLET WATER UTILITY 4GWAAY - - [ail: LA CIRCUSDRIVE 40 OI SEXTET FM COmIT REGIMAL MTU.41" - EASII I RISE E11114 54' EI IQOPIOx[ WEST COIMUN[11oN5 'CAR SOUTH TANORINE IMO 50' EI FBE PRDIECTION PIOER RARE. MBE DEPARTCOUrT ;I CABLE TEIMSIM CORM 1 - -- KS' :1 Rt-14. ABJALEMI TO IF WEST_ RI.144 ADJACENT TO C-1 04' 75, 22. IN E 14OPERTT OWKRMIS ••NT[SSWS M ASSIOMS NIZEC'TQ - A 4[FP ALl NEONRU lAlOSUPE YEAS MN MNm N A WEED FMLIRASN "EE COEITM. LNOSCJE WIT111.11: WHO: 54NM 4IST ROAD SO' 21 M REPLACE ACIAO PLANT WIFHIALS MINIM SO DAYS 31 WINTAIN 1K ARIGATIN SYSTEM N A ROPE WORRN. OEM. __EAST: LA [AwDA WIVE sDDII IAKETIE ROAD 70 A' A FINE IF ANTS CONNECTED TO AN APPROFLD -170 SUPRT OF t5W SUN FOR FARE PHOTWITS K17, R1-fA4 LF SNNLL ¢ NLSTALLED AND N SERVICE PRIM TO CIA MRTURE RATUIAL DELIVERY 10 ME 6. FMLING ANO LOADING SPACES CALCIHA11Ns: SITE. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTIN OFFICE MAILERS ARE CONSIDERED CNBIISIIHLE MAISIAL MILLER RANCH - BUILOINO AREA . ]MASS IF 24. YPIEVTO FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS MILL BE INSTALLED AND N SERVICE PRIM TO CUWJ MU MATERIAL. DELIVERY 10 THE OIL X M APPROVED AUTOMATIC SPRINCLER SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED THRODNOUI EACH BELONG 26. RATER SCREE[[ HILL BE FROVEDIEO BY OID VALLEY WATER UTILITY. ZO.A AWES 0.21 2S' WR IM C-1 u. AN, N T-P 2e' RAW BLUGS 1"3 32' WW 34• WR RETAIL 10.100 Si B 4 ]PACES/I.OUO Y 47 SPACES 9.ma 5AM l.000 SE • 10 SPACES/1.W0 S >a SACS TOTAL . 72t SPACES T21 PACES IEOUIIEOIALLOWEO =1 lHoll IUF: SO, lO 1.0 SPACES - ZC 15 SPACES 39 SPACES VAN ACCESSIBLE . 1 PM S K SPACES . 2 SPACES Sa SPACES CAN PEEL: IOC CF T22 T2 SPACES 13 SPACES RICICLEII PER EACH 20 SPACES RLOIIRE01 36 SPACES 37 SPACES 11M CLASS 1. 90C CLASS 11I 16 Q I. 31 Q 11) LNMIFO SPACES: 12' A 16' OFICEAEIAIL/KSTYAMII 191.600 $F 5 SPACES II SPACES IYEHVIOUS TO AIL ARE. 151.2% SO IT 1. CIAL PHA$. 144.13310 50 FT PH 1. 116.425 SO FT "1 2. I111,762 SO 17 NASE 3. 33.2m w rT PHASE 1. 31.T54 SD IT LEGEND - CONTINUED ITEM STANDARD DETAIL EXIST RIOII.Or-Hal- MAONNLIMT---- - ----'- aE-l1K ._---- ---_ 19MPoSm SEIU t1QE41EOF-- - - -- - - - SMAR AEYNATE-- ROADBAT CE M 1QEPIEK oMSTAL- - - - - - - Tl X DIRECTINAL 9GN - , EDTIrIcaA014 DETAIL RV ERM¢- - - - 1 • 31EE1 SPoWRIG ¢TAN. CHINA CRESS ..'I OF.."HII------- �- FIVE I ELEVATION----'---'-- -- TOP OF- FLO.LLK -..-----._---- AX1B1"FAC[---------- R[[NUCD MT" BI6xT WISIBBITY TRIANQE WIN MADE IA--------- FWSNMNOEm--------'----- amANC-^---_-_ _ - TFR HARIV[3TIN6 ANus- -. -- - - SYMBO F r . Y !W 7'=t WlF THIS of PROJECT OWNER/ DEVELOPER DISCO-*s - MAL L". I.M. ARIYIO UNT,LD LINeNTT LCAPNIY ..,1•Y :Is. �Y IRS -I RFLWE NRVE SMTE CRY _WM. Ax AIIM LOCATION MAP PNOE�IliO IsT-e929 TTRA11E5 IIAIEIIMN A mum OW SAT LM 34.1 11 Se U E c A SEEM LEGEND TOWN OF RE VALLE'r. PHY CDIMT,Alra- ITEM STANDARD DETAIL SYMBOL AL PIYNL PECIAMY- MYNL A.SMFET 3 CONCRETE FAVINC - - - - -SEE "TAM C SIEET 3 I•VOITIUL CWt ETYPE 21- - m 209 - - - - - - {•CMt NK OOTID- ..- 50. NY - - - HTEAIY- FPOPOtTT LBE -� -. -. -... _ - _•_ -. ... LAI4)5CAPE SDFFOTAE LIMITS- - -- -- - - --" - - - IIMDIHN UTBACAS- - -. --- '• ' - - - - - - - tISE.mCOHN0ART--_-----_--_ Mr. CMlDCH LIFE-------.--_ MAP SPo7 ELEVATION--------- ':"^: FN19W➢ YIRFACE EIEVATIM- BILE PoNi----_ ------ IP L TW IWILL rwSH FLOW "IllN - - --' - - - .. PrE 57" _ Do C`.WUFMI U4-- - _.... - - .. .. EAST wells I. awE- _ GIST WATMLLK .-K-v- O EYST IATERLIK m BEW- [NIST Y¢AOBAMD 0.ECTRIc lNC - - - - - - �•LL� •- IN EXIST WAS LANE--- ErIsT TQFPNOHVTv CABLE AONE- - - -- -'•- -- - -Uri -:a•N- ®DIRT DWYGEAD O.-IC LIME - - EXIST -HOW OPTIC LINE - - - - - - -�!A- I� �* ParPOsm PRIVATE x1KW I/IN -- �- HE - no. "WHEN ------------- E ILO' COEITINS-. .. - - -_ OIM • tY9 U FLOW -01 FOR EEO. OISCHAN¢ - - - - •-- - ^- Cl FL UPER SPACE- ----__.-_ _--- :_1 �S Fs PANIC SPACE PP-w - - - - - -• - ' ..... AI IMHNCAP F.NIND SALT RFINN1x6 HALL - -- - � - - - •.... .. .. - - IGUN MGIMm SLOPEON �✓ - 1 CWe ACCESS DAMP .� - - -SD 20I1UIME5 oTKARrsl NOTTN I? COMMETE SDEAALA - - -SD IRO - - ..- - -­ 9D' NI 10' YI.YM ACCEPTED SI' AN of SO' AC:. I TOWN EL"A TOWN OF MO TALIEI,Q DD al' NIN 15' NIX TUC ¢VE COUPCAM's PWN rM 94 A EOV 7 THE W1M ARIL C W THE _EAT OF tD10 WAS APPROVED tY 20113. DIIU TI113 OAT DI t01G F 30NIN TYPE T' 3U' MIN 11K 'B' 30' YIN 11PE 'B' ORO VALLEY TOM CLEM 15' WASH PROTECTION WHOM A -TURNED - PARKING REWIRED PONCHO PROVIDED WWI[lE: BAN {.1M S • 3.3 SPACES/1.000 SF IS SPACES NEDIOAL OFFICE 50.136 S 4 4.5 SPACES/I.000 9 226 SPACES GENEAL RN ICE , 1S. 73. SF B 3 SPACES/LCW Sf 31T SPACES PIW 101NIY BISTEIATM APPROVAL ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. PARCEL WS.2A-474101B. 71-I1-ODIC, ZI9-AI-ONA, 7147-EOM 2117-0060219A1-011A 215-41-01LL QAE 1 a CLE PMYNC EllS[EV.-PMERO---___..._ [NWT YIloglluY TFAVI- RIOlECl1VE ANNI- RAMIK ABiA1Et6lED NOJN0M11E - -..-. •. -._ _- - - - _.. ^_--_ 100 lR FL000 PROx[ LINE - . •_ - - - ^.. _._ __ BURDNi ERoslw sne.cA EFITMG FEK[ - - CHANNEL. CROSSING • SFC 10h. NDICATOH - --- -- - -- MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR MILLER RANCH A Gy ABOARD SJML 3 PORTION D< 7K TKWN WR ONARTER OF OV12-08-07 SECTION 3WN_ tEN`M . AN ET HRMR O Ea57.GRa \ OV9-04-@ L,LT ROD YDEINL IONX M MO YML[Y, PWN mlRlTl. AN110FU. DATE: NOVEMBER 17, 2009 a- N/A TWO. NTwVAI. wA SHEET 1 OF 11 Canwtl.E or TAMDamL ROAD FDIXm n D Mix 5 W. t L1'w0Y DLLEIL.iw S- V/ cm - EMIR Sul II ]I FU(1m 3j Rww BITN TAX JI IS 7/90 ON MIRTH 5004 1 MID-SFCTIaI LIVE 6 5RE4- IF1 FRIM CALCULATED POSITION Oi s'/. CaaaM II � 11 a rl �a� I raa°; I 0 � � Y a m 0 25a ORIK-TNRII SETBACK EROM ; IE]maITTAI 1 '^' � N D'292a■ 2HL60T[i �T RENTER % sEF 1 CTR. Mo ""' NIN+"' /' rent EJ) { I UNSUBDI Vl DED AccvE9 AASEn F311-14,6 NIT. R=RD - �, 1 xBEE ffi"EIi:T aS J°� o a O ev ZLqz nhn. I UNSUBDIVIDED UNSUH01Y1DED UNSUBDI VI DED ffiW tV2l'RQ.R SG E r■ roa UNSUBDIVIDED UNSUBDIVIDED raPm•REmw FWQ FaffiRBWVZ'RE1M QTF FaOO V�R4BAR �9-944 ffii9-944 911X tAD, t1 ¢D1 Al PARCEL cEum IIIIx TA41S lTY oX PROPERTY LIME oM PPDPRTI LDE AT PARC0. [DRRn R ERT(LME pp- Sp• y p0, --- ffiEE ffi99rml 99 1 ITT 1r2 •Rw.R effi@@ ffiF7EC� S GPE ffibEC�Y D xvTzn'Pzs+ess - _ -- - - - --- ■ x Ai Ls na91 SEE SH ET 101 I F°u°Fruizpi'ss�z! aie 1 of I I I 1 I i :I, f jai p1 ca!"* f I I I I EMI Ifa;ESD �16 I I r.IL. I O 8 G BLDG - t -` to BL BLDG BLDG 1 3 BLDG 1 7 -- •svlr2zE �• -IIIN tAi LS TIl9 � I eevv - 1 I +'1 n'Fa 'P' - •-`•--- �--CANAVA""-D Rl V E r�- ` e�sls of -REAR � t- 1 ` ■1raRw.nat TxPD --- `� `.' y�----- w]rzam---- - --.-�- VISTDSO GATEWAY LOT BK 57; PD 35 \� TOWN DF ORO VALLEY ' 70WN OF DRD VALLEY 11 I 1 1A5 III EIEYAL Fat mi SIAIYEI IS A V7 Nw - RESAR Ar ixE SONH■ESi CIXO+w OF iNE PIERSCC lal W u CANADA OR Alm TARGE'Im W W, vESCNUIFa A5 9EMR MARM Pro AT sTAna1 m.&T5 - f6.i9'IEFT PER WIN OF OR O VALLEY FLAX OF LA CARAOL DRIVE PROTECT m 70 PRIVATE PUBLIC DVO527.ELEV.na1 fis-miff Mims DATIM. MANHOLE DATA MANHOLE DATA SEWER KEYNOTES MN•IRIu 99.5 MM`RIM s.. MM•]RDI.,X9.R[. IM I Y"Li ..5PIY f61 ... RE so., B•B IE sll rN E Sit IrW tE led 1-ME OE 903 <T> 450.0 lr PIBLIC I•PK 903■ ® 75a LF Psu-.-P. 94/Y e'E It MY a'-IT2L5 1•S NE 945 9•E E 16f 1•B I[ 00.1 © 245111 IF PIBLIC /'PVC IOSL ® 52.0 IF PRIVATE 6-PVC 91.1. 1'5. It 90.5 YN •/ Al. ILO MM •5 AN 17J YN •6 RIM 215 YX •C RIM Sib 101 T PIY !13 9'E E /ld 1'K & 9L1 Q 2.5 IF PSBLIC I•PVC BLIP ® 51.0 IF PRIVATE 6-PVC 9L2L I'NE LEOL1 I.. e's a,OL6 I'SX I[ OL9 E ks 1'N E It1 r5 E 0.9 9'SR IE 97d 1'V E 612 Q 911 IF PRIVATE I -PVC MFL 45.0 IF PRIVATE 6-PVC nDY ■'■ IT01J AM •T RIM 211.5 MX •1 RIM a.2 © 71U IF PRIVATE rPK 9LGZ ® Ma IF PRIVATE 6 PVE f1.22 e'N11 R: 2. - It 01a © 955 IF PRIVATE rPK 001Y © 35a LF PRIVATE 6•PVC BSOz 1'S NE B•E ME O1/ LINE TAME ..MC DIRECT I01 LExiTN LI S la 1S'01- ■ 37.5/ ]!0D IF PRIVATE B-PLC MR © ]6a IF PRIVATE 6-PVC 9L7I 12 N 59. /3'SZ' R 5.00 -: IEoa IF PRIVATE B•PVC 9Li2 ©77a IF PRIVATE 6-P, KTZ PRIVATE CLEANOUT DATA Ll s]IP2.•De-■ so.oa Ls s Bw",10' M N./1 LS S P]]'2Z' F 60.00 ® 110 IF PRIVATE I -PVC MZ ® 37a ER PRIVATE 6•PVC 9Let Im •A CO •1 CO Y CD ro EO'E ® 500a IF PRIVATE B'PVC $Is% ® 77.0 IF PRIVATE 6•PK 9LSZ m =5 E 919 RIX 00.2 DE915 RIM S9d PCKD RW o" E 211 R. ED" RE su CARVE TABLE MAW DELTA RADIO ARC m 500.0 IF PRIVATE 1-PVC 9LS2 Q 710 IF PRIVATE 6'PVC 9L1Z CO M, RUM D55 CO •f PW 011 CO MI RIM OSA CO •1 RIM 0i5 CO •J RIM AS CZ Ii•Zl'SD' UE.15 1!].li LF PRIXAIE 6-c BS= E 91.9 IE 97.9 E 02.2 E 02.6 E 09.5 ® Ins) IF PRIVATE 9'PVC stoz CO •K RIN 16a co K RW 211 CO MI RIM 25d Eo •X RIM 21J CO • 0 RIM ]LT Sa LF 9R m 6-c 91aY E ILI IE B.5 E IDA E III E 25.1 ® 61a IF PRIVATE I•PK @WX c0 T RIM 31.5 E 264 slcxi VISIBILITY TR IAHM[$ MSVTI LOCLTION SPEED FAR SIDE NEVI SIDE ® ]la If PRIVATE 6•FYC 40JX I ®]SD IF PRIVAK 6-PVC B9.a 7ANOERINE ROAD /5APn IP05TED: 1S'x 110' lA FW.OA [RIVE ID -I IMIEDI 15'B ]iQ' 15'X f0o' IS'. /10' F nnr+vwt •un.aAn IN ,uue PALL'S IMA , 10'• TO IYIMORI 10'• ]0' R410 MEDI'm ISLY+05 I51N ]0' 10'. IOQ' 0'/ ]0 ®PALL'S F CTwrANT PW1mrs�i/•M i iDIfD Vt. • VI F-0RRR - -r---- ---I �. UN SUED IVIDED 89-3aT xnyE ZMJMS i011� LEImIX MME Imol" LCIIOITNLE LENLI■ o1•oi• i io•}a• i 31 i6e i+ j}}]L�L�+3 ss/i FF '1;: ]oi sszi 1l5 ]]lele s ixriy5'Ji; 11•]i']11' :li L�°9 `i1 Ss14 41; i ' 5^ R 11,04, D.75 5S S Ssi�• o=;i 13.41 1,1 i�` S 5 3S �.2 SSs13 '; SMI 9).19'01' ="�D s5 i'1S.1/• 1' 1tb.b5z 111 Sf ■ •i0.1)i IL17 N1 ]9:11 SD LL55; 3Z3S Sf16.52'1, 79:19 }SU6 21; ii10' i.9yB II1S S f'20; 1f' E N.96 rLs` 1' `ale', 16.2] n37 III s 'S/,1/; CC SZ•le YZ1�5�1 Z/. z 1 5 pp 22pp S /.•55 Tin X ZZpp RAS 1 }1� 3 15'99'i9' i i0 19 L51 SSZS'S1'7}Ui' 1, "UN Z}2�LL}21 1ZL)1•W' ■ e6.19 1 11i1 5 1S•12'i0. 8.Z1 ]ZIIZZe.1 SSI1J'09,07; 9 y.y121.03 Lis sSX Zf9•a22 }21�' C 19.80'E9'€ 1Di.16 91�f1 7LS3 SSS!'1}9�'so i1.�ey0 7xL51{7 /915 L 9 5570'Cf'00' ■ 59.f1 7L60 siii 1/:1T; 1}}', 111rI" 9 f] F 11jj9j.51 1598,.j1„ L. -64 i 12.49 1L11 9 11'10•i4' 75 51P]2'so E 151.�I ' S r, MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR -A I.A+w" L MILLER RANCH OV 12-DB-D7 .0.1 A PORIIOX 6 lNE 10u71EA51 [DARTER 01 SECTION xT0 -w 115CYTN RANEE a EASY'... 9 OVS-04-02 sLLT BY- MIRIDI-?- v am NLLLEr.PwA calrrtY..Rl:wl/. DATE. NOWWBER 17, 2009 .. r. roa cane 8 w Emu=r SHEET 2 OF 11 N,.lrE-ito-Lroer,c�s.m.Ew _ile�.n 1:..u:P.co-P-"•yercM-ozar :o-un.;o[ REZONING CONDITIONS L INEI THE ANU ADJACENT TO TIE ROUNDABOUT KWG INC NEST SM OF THE IAOPOfT TO SPECIFY THAT A 111LWRC [0.YECTIW TO 7NE FKISTMO UFSIOOttIK HOME$ REST BY TIE VAS4PARC¢S 219-47"14OCOIA.050 NO 1701WIU RE ACXIEVEO VIA A PFR PLAN 7' PER RN NU O.S• 1 — I E'TIPE 7 VERTICAL LOU PER W 209 I PLNL PRECAST RX ! VE'9RUI1NOU5 C£NIUED N PARING SPACE .OINi FlLIFIF `_£COAL P® YNOTACTWERS SIWRALK (MERE R¢BGENgT10115. ------------ _ NdI�U RESERVED M 1. ALL BIMENSINS WE LIVEN IN INCHES. _ 2- THESE SHINS ME NOT •VRIIRSIC 11NOILI iN I VANE BARRIME ARM P$INJ W11 ANT". PARKING I - [ROSS-ACCESS EASEMENT. ,-_ SMIN ON PINTNN NC-GUA Sld $SERVED PANIFINISH !. BOTTOSNALI. L MXALOE iM NEW RUNDE mES MT APPEAR TB FOLLON NV NNCOM PMPUITT BIRI[ADE PFA ..� - • •�;1.H�_ •' � SMALL BE 7� ABOVE FINISX GIIALE. E OWNONIELA RECORDABLE ERNEST! WHICH DELMIM THE RE•7DSM IMMURE LINE N A [IR® OVO115 50 IN ITYPI V u 1 -r' 'A'N .� 4:.a...... �_ _ _ ,.. . ; ��" ® iWEYNM. OMIT -VNI ACCESSIBLE' SUPPLEMENT& SYL[ METES B BNNpS MUST BEPROVIDED PRIOR TORCREVIEW BT MAYOR COML C SECnIN - , 'Y ,n:; r PLACTE IN SSTANDARD DISAN^PAILUG 1 SPACES. zoT 7. PAR i rc HYDROLOGY. P1mvOE o[ruis FN PEAL DISCHARGES WHO ARRoxwt[ RET'MLS sWx u INC REGIONAL WEA VERSib DOCHANCE CRAPxLPROYOUM AM A SNAMIT TYRE R MOIL lE1EDWIE PIFAY PROVIDE P[NEIUC S1AFi WI7N THE S1PR[YENIAL --.r,�!•'TRR—��„n?+ y '�'�-• nCONCRETE WHEEL STOP DISABLED PLATE OR PERMIT oN BACK -HIP DATA APO ACTED TO SAID DATA N INC TEST OF THE REPORT. t. — D O12WSTNPNR xo YALC b ONLY -_ L NOT TIN OF INC NOIRE WASH ABUTTING THE LENCIM a THE HEST SOE PROPERTY LIRE MOIST ACHIEVE INC FOLLOOKL IP R DSDe ' M RCN NUB TRf 2 LAYERS BUMPED NGLLW P A. MWIC ONSOE RIPARIAN COMITIONS EUSTN: MOM 10 DOTIIRBNCE TO CREATE A RE, RAP -r YIL 1•IG'YN BICYCLE LOCNER BY AAAR111 BICYCLE SECWII NATURAL RIPARIAN NRNTAT_ TM7M&WC¢AT10H•SP¢OICALLTFRWN MCA 1 LAVER Nw11 WAD FILTER FARM W EOINVALIAT COMPANY OR EOWL - NOM. ]02 L PINIOE DENYBUALITIFSOFUES 5iIf VEGETATION. MTE, IXE [ORMCIN SNNA EXCAVATE AM ROM TIE SAIL S'N CLASS •RNn[RETE SCREENED NRG IN iRWT pP 81[TCLE SPACE UOIGTEs S'-D"CHEWSPA¢irP.CE) r�'—^�'�'� A RESTg4TIO1 RAN WILL BE REVERED AS PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN PROCESS WNOFII TIE HIP RAP PW M MAT TIE IM w TIE RIP RAP PAD WILL MIEN WE r ININED E¢VAI IN EKI0 NI N INC PLAN. Mf YIN H 6'-]S• 5'Q L THE TOE INC DUO YKIET HATER anon CWY[Ni5 MIST BE •CNEVE0. M OF RALL MY SECTION A -A IeUDgxG A. AN V NO ALL WELLS ON THE ENTIRE PROPERTY RILL BE ABANDONED PER ADIR - ' SCALE _C:'-: �:yt� '..- ; WALE xAHp¢IP NO1 E•VFATI[N EONrn[rz STWONADS RIOIIS ASSOCIATED MTN TOE RMPEAT• BILL BE EXTI"WSXED ! _'""_ - I i'`> -A _ - 1'YIII fP011 BOTIW CUED 1 l$NEIIALI ^ 3 a- Of SIGN TO F.D. t1T1 1 L ANTI COO]OIATEA TMIDILII MIR AM WCOEATATMN OF TNIS 10 BE SUPPLIED TO WILL - - _ p - "1-- �' - .}Il :% •ir - - - - G AMID r007 BY 20 FOOT SITE BILL ¢ DEDICNTED TO NRU FOR A PRESSURE RMUCWE VALVE STATION PMSI ACTIN ONE WESTENY PORTION BF THE COMMERCIAL DEVELDPMCNT. P � r�W d. �, iI?eo •' ? F✓LT i Lµr-nER•01Hu NIN➢OR SECURITY WON - G ALNG LE KILNOWT OF INC NTENNL NAM MAIL THE NAYS SHALL BE THE l! �. M WWW ,`I�I•R MAN -� E• APRNNATS Rf3P0115NRI1V TO WMSTRYCT `L" Nlll ME BNO7E WATER WN lOm. L A O RICH WATER NAM ME. BE NSIALLED FROM WOMEN 10 SOFTH ALOND THE NFSIONY PALL MTHI THE COMMERCIAL BCYELAPYNI. THIS MS N AOOi1N TO 111E R MEN IDWS `, _ �.. TYPf 'B' -1 IMOICADL F •'y`,..y I l• FLOW 10: 1 Pl ,,Qp ' . Qom\\ /,O �7"'r a° I - RHp TO' ••••� • ° HIi CAAIOtt 'SlUVI11G NUCN WOE SURROUND THE BUILDING GROUPS NG CORRECT TO T¢ IMMAEIRWEp D O Mx YARN. 1-{T1, 'l� (•. L THE COSTING 6 NCH YAW N INC IMMUNE ROAO RICO CF WAY 111W TI05 DEV¢NFVINI BOOM SHALL BE CINN[CTED ID AND EWTEMM OM TO THIS POPERY, X7 N 'j" / f j 510E F!N IrE i I fq NO TO THE NESTOR PROPERTY LINE 7.5 MOM Of THE IN LURE A 1S f00T EASEMENT NMLE RIOVIDED TO iM OVRU TM MOS NO All WUS.l1E NEYIWSLT YENIWNFD / NI / 1. • / / 'NIL E 1JACEN ICIXEfETE ' _• / _ _ t O ROA WIN I COOELT TO THE S MIR Wix. f. THE O NCI MAIN SHALL. CORRECT TO THE G NCN NAM N SOwST.A INS MAN HAS i' THE 2 YERi1CAL / SNADED AREU1 M_ ON R' NI StAMARO NOT BEEN CMSTRUC7ED At ME TIME BY CONSENU TIM OF MIS OEVELN T.A O UICX MAIN IN 51NKS7 FROM IN EMADA NOT TO THE TOWN IOIOARY III BC THE - u1b8'FLB363dTiivi ;FRONT w BICYCLE / PAwWO SPACE ACCESSIBLE IMl ••• 22 WK-YD•[ N ANY OR¢TIN WUCAHTS ALSPOMSIBIUIY TO NUILO. DEPRESSED CURB CLASS H BICYCLE SPACES — MEN, ES slaw ACE TIP Poz WunG pp PACE TYPICAL HANDICAP AND STANDARD L NIL APPLICABLE SINOARO RN -IN REIOMNG CONDITIONS PER BES¢YIRN IN 90-21 M'b1 G h0 SCALE GB.7.0[V¢ONEH7 \ ^I 1 NIMNER 01 NICTELE - A IS S[K[ BE AoonFssED. STAIALLP Nazro1A. n6rAL1 IEIA --- ARKMG SPAS PARKING SPACES I. L ALL PEWOTTFD. ACCESSORY AMID CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED U!ES LOWER THE C-1 ZOVL MANUFACTURERS OF THE TON BY ORD VALLEI,EX¢PT INOY USES *COMPATIBLE MIR THE OFFICE PARK RELGa+EMATrJa AM WHEN ROUND WE N•COMPATIB¢ RON THE SW INANE C NONBO ML ARE ALLONANLE NSES. I. THE FOLLOWING PERMITTED USES SHALL BE LIMITED TO OAW SOUSE FEET PER USF, __. --•I• S• a GROCERY 5TWEIIIRTN7IWE SIDREMOM SIM. AE FABRIC STORE. [. PONITED USES N THE C-1 PURISM OF THE PHOJECT ARE ALL COWATINI MILE DEIfVS TRIP MIULIGNTNG FOR BICYCLE PAIRING AREA WILL WE ENPAETm SUBOIALESCNifr. —E PNAR HSES. WXI[M NHCl10E MN ARE Mr lnNfm r0 TIE fO1MulG UST PWNIDNG M¢L PPOYOED BY MUM", SIRE PARE LINTS MIS10N HIS RE OYIRfq AM `.� '+'-:-�-, LSIB• E SmP.UPS SEDRF M SI"M.RESTAUAAIOLBNY NIT* WIVE-TMOW* SIORE.GAS STATIW,NNRONARE STCJE.DMK- • AI?GNN•RI6 HALL upurnrNarn CAPACITY CAYCN BASIN NNSmTS AM E BICYCLE PARKING RECDIPALI TOP e'I. 1. ' 0. RONIMIS WA.%CNNOES.MG TRSUGwNIVE-N RCSTAURILRS. ANUMAL "ITAL. COMVENIFII[C STOM PET BMNG6, ORNATE TO FIT BASIN M T$ OR LLTIWTE• CATCH D SIIIS DN•BIK[PARKIHL M SCALEVIRL •MIf, FINAL MAY VNr DSUBOA N YIIB REPAKFUHERAL Mr. AUTOMMILE PARTS 3TORE.IWID STATIC. NT'LIN¢ REPAIR STORE STIL MtTION CO E NYPASS STRFS ISEL SPECIfFA [IMNTL R6EP TOM RD-GIO•RUS PRIME D MAILS OF f1EED NALRR Of ESTABLISHED SIUBGRAW. L THE WXNNY ROAR AREA RATIO OF C-4 COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AREA WILL BE "I 6 e31 iMFEpt�T1T udptlr INSERT NA BE 0 TD FIT —11N STNBNO 517E RAT ORATE B AC PAVING SECT I ON ALLOWED N T-P. TECHMLWICAL PARK DISTRICT MICH CONFORMS TO THE GENERAL PUN rsr[x x CATS WASOn LNUTS. D'-]• GA ¢oKNrs. fL1T LWIE L ILYEN NASFAI SNARE NAVE BOON IF= c � AM t1� Ml�m s¢ PLUS Ica Jogl L INC NENI-W-KAT WELL BE MOICATEO 10 14 300 TIN EFFECTIVE ME Of M20AUNG. YL THE BERN 7HIR¢ H OF 1. Y PARII rtif DISTRICT NLL NY[ A OF TM1. I.I.M. OVIASS AM TOP VIEW WT LLiwlE-NG FLN BYPASS PEAT RF ROn4 e1PASs S ASS. 9St. WE - I llW AUTO Tn1N IN ME N INN E MOTION THE I of AY I¢T NIM ME IEENG ANO CONSR FN [OMS1MIClm rRpM SrunLE53 Si¢T locnnGAs WMAMI 0 FEET IN NEVAtN Swn RSW WILL ¢ WNIWZm BMl WILL NOT Fx¢ED N FEET N ELEV ANY SPECIAL ANNITmTURAL TEA TMES SMALL MOT RE MBIE MAN I FELT ABOVE THE ALLOYED u Fact NONE. puTE IASKET —PE ADLL 1-TYR 1PPO57 BARRiEApFS b � PER SD Nc • ILTWATE l ALTBN II N.. M O[ rr N ;_ NPA53 CLEARAR0[TIEEN TeO O ' WAIL[ AM 1N q YAEY ORWLM ill:l ' : nENVS AY SI 6'NIOI WYJIHR} 51.REFn WNL - ( Y. 1� C PEA NNII¢i Ri1NL STli[p DWIu - • R 1 H1AS]-A-CNdEtE H50p PN IAL'R •' `. Y �. 1 __— RISMML W OUW IGNM7 1 P— REFER TO rM RD<AIIB \S 1pWl —1 FN SNALLDWNSTNLTIOxi a45RET PER W0N1615 SPE6 ® l%i. .., �'. ""'' NA—N— L ILnR WLWM HALL BE RMB H—EAk •:... P-- INSILLIED AND WMAINED TH WMPICTED NNGRAR-S�CWIR. NOS—NACCORDANCE WIN MMYIFAATLRIN �ADHNKMATIDNL RECOMPACT T0' 0-TO MXXTOAWIN yy1 P�PC n5p 10 YAtCM C¢W BF BIILLONG, SIDE VIEW M� T D000w FRAN] SING r. IO1UMsrm ANILES-NLUED. §E _,. CATCH BASIN/WILIER INSERT PINT10MTN WORD K ' .1 _Pb MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN <:OFI n xo ••A • eUODING.PER ARCSOET•S SPECS. ` GRUTED RIP RAP SLOPE TREATMENT I LrO G—�` FlYN r.- N-N-1•7(A PIPE 1l MILLED RANCH WIT.CNERE,� ANilO SINGLE TRASH ENCLOSURE BEING A PNTIN BY 79 SOUIMEATT OLLVRER of K „I„RA IN--... M. F o T:s NNE RA51 ND AL OV12-08-07 SECTION ] 1— NSOUTH.RINGS G EAST.— IAIMP+,ixl SALT HIM MERIDIAN. TORN W MVALLEY. Pw COUNTY. NAGNN, OV9-04-02 '�' "—.""�'."'•' "'� ""°"• •'�•' DATE; NOVEMBER 17. 2009 SHEET 3 OF 11 wAu. w -- N1MYAL• NMA S' YAR F VARIES MARIE51 W-12' X• wx 44 F WUOINB=IN[0 G W/ .♦� rrE oua ` i/ T i . SIN `3:1'.. PROPO7F0��%' CF C OSS SECTION P•, VAR RS n'• VARW3 ClTSr f PROPOSED l{� �• 2,��"i BNIIDta 7 oY PEE Dom a/ I LL SX N h X- PpSETf r i tl'PO+E � CD CROSS SECTION FV• VARIES DRIVEWAY S'TO 0'• i WYMM SEM it 4rtlM SECLATT W��5 BAFRUA AC MYEYE FFE tl.00 RETAINDIO WALL PER 154MER I CWW C�FFNYq PER Fl AN PFA RAN ARCNnEMPA NQ STRUCTURAL OMWOg5 F YER 20S DpW CIAO PSO 209 CM PM PG D10 an rr if CG CROS CTION MD SCALE PROPOSED PULLING I FFE tl.70 votN� ui1i�F CI CROSS SECTIDN @pgss � KTYPICAL W 0 NG on, YA MFJIINO 1E ,• SLOPE PER PLAFI OTE, FOR WERMU WILY. SEPARATE BUILDING PERMIT REOUIRED. RETAINING WALL SECTION 0 , M L xo cu 10•• T i' S• 2B' iP PARABIG MALL IE '- wIEMI 1. S' 2'. �L IFPF W GTM WASIR 7MEEA RALL PEA 1 xrNIM SECINITI UE fF-1 LRALE Y wCx11ECiWu !Iq IEIAIWNG Rut PM I^ BtlWB oL PER A ]C9 PA iTPE R 1gp(FED CATM I SIRUETWAL Am$ / APINRE[TIMI AW I I BASIN V2 Ef 1 E 2 VYq I WDPE1gIL STRJCTIAAL ERAWDf7 OPENRIS PEW PIXI PFA SO 709 I 6AGAFD y � rq GRdR P RAP ® RI vLAncY �� RNWI L . a z v7TPE.7 u': a S2 + �.• • [LAB 9 ]09 � 6� 4 1 fi'. �4 i'�r` S'TYfE T KAiI[LL / CORB PEP ID X03 2 LIVERS OLY'ED pRLLN WO(R Pp •.2 LITERS fXILPEO ARGLLAR POE4 AAP PROUETIM 070-114 AIR HAP PAO. D50•!•NUL T• x'WF T-tl•wx wER ILATER ."1 IUD �OSS SECTION C OSS SECTION FABRK OR EOUIYALENT iliM F1.7ER FAME OR EOMYALERF CE '-—�SCT•Li CA Xp yLALE y.. rA®Iu: OR murvuror CB CR 55 SECIOV N CC CROSS S ION MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR MILLER RANCH bt,• Alla WEING A PMTION Oi THE 70Y7RTAST dMRi[R Q OV12-08-07 SETIoxxTo.sSllsauwMwsosasT.uus OV9-04-02 SALT NIVER YERIOIAITMN Oi ORO YALIFT,PNL c—MAR—A. DATE-. NOVEWER 17, 2009 scuE. v. —im nrcERYu.xYA SHEET 4 OF 11 — CROSS SECT ON Sf 1 r T4 Y TnE E'MT 9 11 FaF52 U a' �4' M)SX x/.$aMl sfAEp1 �i PEN ♦N.N To Fm PLMl5.5 ® MNR WTfN i FA 1N[NIIu[[I5 $PE[5. 1 NII IJ \� Ht/X1�[L�OFSF(FIRITL6CTC 91 1 tl PEN �NLNITEfTS YEES. � fal$liW[T 0]aV FNSYES ING ]Y]YVY$IFEL �NLLFS- RiRSTFS➢ �/TYPE R T 4TEIAl pE[Y. PAWT TO WTCH OT b116DIr14 PEN MEgEES SPE6 OUR E TRASH ENCLOSURE � mLlTawmaNLE na scuE r� MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR FILLER RANCH �4.r'SrSJ0 PLYRIaI M WNTP Or �] O O`'y 1L-08-OT OLIN4 l � SOUTKIST SEfi1M Y,TWNSNP tISWIR xYIGI O [.EST, GR1 OV9-04-O2 4uT mv[N YLwouRlarx a ano v�u[r,PIN. mnlr.YUTMI DATE: NOVEMBER 17, 2009 s L[I WA caTam wTE V-A SHEET 5 OF 11 ;Tq$,iUG%r GV::9.ioro S146&'cY_45ay1 2iYC`�01] L!'1 BUILDING 3 SEE SHEET 7 FfE CKSD p� . I t �:%S '....15L.'c/ ' / .� y,r:LPml9.GFS� _ /j� 11 © ©© f 3 • o) T °u� 1 ,;''�L/ %i r n9- % KEYNOTES NER PTTPE E rERTITAI t]N PER so 20! rtfP, I f0iQ'pNf-DAbs'�•'L. /'f - `Y $-� Z�>9 / _.. K'- fs . Ar --�/ .. f I/ ly>-y SIDE 10 T LII¢ SIDE FA57 ` f • '/ - Y x� _� ! O PAYENn11 AS IE[E MI. YAM AND " NEW ' 1 - SIDE TD RES SIRS+ % f 2GC -�- ,� 2 •P e�� 9 I f /' S. 2 SAII Nr Il IYNIIWI Ill WOW [Yl6i pR! NO ` SL t -.. ✓/ ; P xs/ :ti 1 °-,5 A am �5 ,p o 5 /yj, / , li` PAYE"Flll lD TIM PAMENT ,- c I v r • > Q ® A I z /�� ` �.'i • / r. O OcAns PER b�•10� IIEarTY IRTx TmwCA1FD i �,: I m>bp= 51'aP' '� Sr^'- '� _ = � .. ''' fy� � rG 2 ut `r ' - •y �' +1� e� . �' /.t 6 rRaAsv .�: 7<. sc.LE O PI 5 ANTA1D PARKV9 SDACETVWX MITI? J7Gr P l 7D A , P sEln o / I BU I L N •' j;/ le ' .: r I >€ /. �, L / —6 -�—�� DYEnl—m. MPER Ri•a nm ER INTERVAL INTERYu a r '-1 i t {' { r^1. r" _ b. a♦;TIulZ ,. iy G CL R -' q Jr /. /§�f// / .I jra� r IE O CovERm PAR6WG PER •RCIETECTMAL PUNS ,`• � 1� /-LF�'9FW Si 'i5 �1 LP 0 5 ''-P �" / /F'r ♦W P / 'r �' a \' �4� / 1/� 1 © OJ:TCLE PYWND KA RTAE rtm i ° /'a/' lf•Yy�` /� r 7 Q TRAsx ENCLosu[ rm•sCREIN WALL !JD ODD tEAR .\ n000 'E) S 'i �➢E- � 1 r nE oo.so i � �- �., ® ® '�,��2p�� 1 r ' aO,w SEIFKLDSDID. SEViITfAPG 641E PCR lTm� 1W15 ... ' )y) y I l.G,�' 1RGls •-}J "•' N l I �4 isTlDn�r ' W `PI •i R .f{f/ % is • r C /i /�' 1 Q CAA 75' PASS =DRV DEF/LOWING IDNEnm WUILDMot 79 .A L 7\1� f" Y. �'• f J ' rz 5 a _, �r'. ' �' / - $�$ s �`1L.. - „ 1 s ! DI irRat�TQ•, •� / '`t' o r ps caNumrz vRWLLR PER sD zoo rtm % dzID rlMAss 7 '' A6D�' K I 11 ' � I)'EL/ =•tzj Q PEDESTRIAN rnossWLLR mPl (D RI•I sraP vus 1,--, y � '' � sf n -'�- Ix1a£-txRu {•'Rig T J •, • Y 9u 5` 4 .A " s rfi um sF % T /. .' REIIJNIH6 IN PER 1RCtDlC[iYRII YD I 'AI , W ) I )7`N $ \' '-L., •: � T' i< � A [ � t / m^, F f 0a00 �^ -�" L (�@t 4 ' ' 1 ' i � , .� �r 54 t ',: ® S1PolCnmdL oRARIN45 niPl ,} A H li IYPVC _ 9 �T` 99J /• FC 9''TC7° 'A q 7-. SEWRT, SAWNER ITT" J WIN I O'h � . n"f 5'! / t5 ti•� 245 _ Lyl' �y '.� ��.� / / / , . /'/ 1 / � •.]"�•L,t� a N - ® FROSTING FENCC TO RE TER SERVICE •' PROPOSED DDYFSTIC WATER SFAVkE nNl tp� 1W OmDIROa ze Wra sud dr,> _7./_..� / /jgsg,q ,Fa,•: t7 .. KR'�W I v maurcnlrttApm. sumE J f{ I - vfti ° - PRowsm IRRIGATION sERY'¢E rtm PRO \ ,,sT ♦ - In Q Posm S-Tom rtm 1 GIDOx !10 pf 1 Wff1. 911 di �5• l I t ` '�r N+r- r i� " - / / / /. I//S 'Lv, cNN umP bo If/ w 'fc rpq/ k �_ O mo1ErL{_5ztl` P.LSa Bortoxa �i.{} 7�i•r ® PwaDsm rw maY ¢'CYO / Y l , GEr. zo GF.'S05r( •I T ete_WAu 9 k r'�-�� f: •> v u sx h i k .Y NN a us fss:P T _ >- 7 ! ♦•r DPEIiUR: fL% ' .(N�-.,., I P. _ - t - _ �.✓� / ET .} � $ �. - 7 \ \ � % � - f V' 1 • r1 ! r D r f f 4 0. � � so¢rNWAu PSR LA,mSCAR PLAN ll j f_ , E9 'm•rT alrf �! I � • /.y � r � TYPE l [OxOETE 5tRt1ALR SLIPPERS Pm 9 3a1 > REAM. RU T$ r _ I f: . I �G^�yh I:E Y /; ' /'v •� / a Dpc[E ! �, Q ® 71PE z smER+LLt snYFFA PER so zos CEPim eAs r PR:. _ SD sm W/(MSi illlSN IWEATNENT Wnn .oW eaPLwle t•-yn:.� X ® TYPE . 9-E CAiCx W M V I EF pUIC RA 101 RC[dlq L C EASFImIt ___� < T f - 1 , fl'J / / E I •�T E, 11 p' / , Cf] .•�C al > 'v 67 Z EA - /J / -� , � 9ASa 1l 1 `I_ t. : _ %f 4 ' 1m:. imma c— win R,t a-1 GR•TEs 5� a Or1E<:,. / _ _,�,.rt-h"~ r. J �,r } rE1RE LWE St f- { - 1 p -L z DT &'n4�n'-'--� PER so J09 VTWSi nY911REATumt um PDi {S D `: I » _ 17- s_.-� APPRONIwILL ) t ° I '�•, I'� F l;' 1 �hL Wmo�]-A era >'• YQ 90•moN m1 ` Z'' 1l I.,/I i rD yyy ly L E FO AR*tin TA ry. i } II 1+ s ixeT, 1 PA SRTA• lAE . Ym61ED [lt[x 45N Rn Fi-E [A•t[5 -N-ry .�� ILS 719o•IIN I,TUN Sd,1HY !!L"� ll6'E R T ONE . ' .I i f 1 '( _fir I 1 ' f1 \RDN.�' ' PER sD JIA W,iWm RUSH IREAIYEIIT MIT PER® ID WO•SID110N JJICa•Jo1Y'E J1 j /.g. I�--}- 3 ! FRdI CIl21iLAim PDSltldl �; _ !AY tM Rt CIEAI!iw NEARP j J Ai 'y ! 1 IWEjI j L �, 7 ' y - R1Ec TROPFRn S' EA SD YJ9 .11PST RUM IrEATYERT In i a s'/. cowEn s. , ®trPE. umWm ulcx e•sd R/. ET•t puns im Ymate ® im 1 YWinm CATCHR,N W/S EF-1 "ITS 11 R® o J �_OL r-.n_ •r N / 1h -- -- _ , / ` f ,. PEN 5o Sfl9 VfiRsi iWSN TREATYExi um PER TYPE 1 YDo61m CLiCN WIN W/7 EF-1 MIES `• I ,• - 'I! f _ - �- PER 50 179 III -AST RUM TRFAIYENI OMIT PER b PCR SO 2171TYPI q' / ' 6 �Y - � ® trN 75'IDADIMG 2mC [RM - /•.. .. I I.� -1- /i-SgNIE.F-5ECimn [UR9f DRDP INLET PEW ADD, so C-Ills rOsuox cucaAtm usm 793. i , I rffnErnm-p•uRUL1+aN.—.- rcuae aFENWIc _ 9rlDD,-WDDmS� —'% qN 6•n ...NW9'S6@£ 261466'm0••_ c ,. NOTMMG mWD DUW E 1 kt I YERi1CLL WRW-71W9'Zd'W£-Z674]9'1[7— E[ dl I II 7 LA• , OWE RENOYFo I 6. PER SD E09 rGj % GtNNER JA TO SEC su .- •; N 6 s n -a -�_ � s-rQ- ® .• awW aPERW+G ISECTIDV LINE - �_ I1 - -1yif- G'mnB pYNRIG TAN6ERtNE ROAD =' a._ -- _ ~ - d+�'- 2 s CAP SIRIYET �' �--r - a'CLwe �FHIIG W/t TYPE MIDST BARRICADE FDWIi!-Pa0/hP•SE-CE 51 fl41 i .NOT eSCDIGS. AI ® PFR 5➢ ID6 /-- •i�tANE-IN SOUTHERLY + dm 1PE SdrtNmlT PgOLQIGATHIIr YM1 IS SWTN a tl . m•CUTS OP[NIMG M/1 T12 9•PDSi WAREICAOE r0U AR 5 R'Y �• T RR 10 %/ OndmT 4!R P R SAIO - r2 E / MIfRSf[iIDN ' • LI R. GLCLLAIm •` WE 1tf0 - -•'^ > I �1'S r .er.lrv,.n�_ _ ® PER so me St M CIMW OPDIV,D W,7 T,PE T,•Po57 WMRICA06ED ) ¢ , ! f A --I--,_ -�-1 VFS� - ® zdcul0 �NNID an TrPC Tl'PaST WIRmAOfs® 173 b^J 79U.. "T'-' -, a- +.a�+.. r'a(r�'1 "•.. -- �1 t r-�� _-J , /', 1 y •, 'W/ �' ® ENDYERiI[LL C1NW mIN ]'IFEMINM SECIN'1 PER PRIMG( I-061 _:JMI' T- a i s•-r-*-:-? % - \ 7f ,!E/ �I (• _ ��_ -, so za TREATMENT s 5$I�i — -_- •r , �'r—f=, --i� X� —?- : r 'r,-r t t • La ' `Y, Ta£ umlilm EATEREATERe PAsnE W/c vt mm ,. ]a -:I�YEYS.ISt RIDCRWTI r - % ^� A` t j yy Y�_Y ? - si, { r ') f • 7911 , . ® m 50 s09 TAMEST FL09, TINY PER '1 ETA ESIIILF B NGi•YC I G 1., f/r ITMAST , 51 r _ E `Y-y.i^• 1 J J / / f" 1� ( �r ,' r PC9/m] A A E.12 •1 r'!rl �, N•�aP'I PJ. i C-'j :t•- :� } 1 �.,. f `� 1- :l9 f`�' • I a I ,,lER DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR t.,':7.: �NI.,. 2 MILLER lf�ANCH LLu RRN,,, V@,�UL? RANCH CDMMEIN /TRE.A ,1.. , f , T� ».. �� • a aFMC • Pmi10N O -O7 , IIE SDI IK.I DUARTV a NNIN�,nWu BiC 57 PG bb N OV1Z-O8 sfrnONJ.TmIRvaPnzoJrNWAI¢tuEAST GRAAaIz— Ymnilmo - v .J. ,i_4--,t`'�'�` _I>I1 i 4.✓G- j'fL 'j T,� �` sYr mvFR LENLwAN. TO. a ORD YALLEt 1:-.1.U,g` •wx>aJlu,N 7 i... .9-' . __, ... _. . ' 14. i > IL I_r 1. . 4 "-•.M.•-'----'�-• T DATEaNOVEMBER 17,2009 srALr, r•JD SHEET 6 Of 11 [snow Ixitmu• r ♦..r,,..Ia♦.Ter.Nv/•.R.entNr.....arAYw.r,a:lu_•atE.�SiJa.iE.�Li'.�JU�"CO-.. 15.:JY-IUt.:-n F'1Lfi.:.r:..4EG:_N-:t.x:n :CYAr ;M YI Lne l T� r'^ �i�.n �uxYu No..D.luR N, .-Yu DES GMET 6 SEE SHEET 6 KEYNOTES QI NER 6-TYPE E VORTICA CURB PER SO 2D9 II IN Q SAW Cul AT F YINIMW. REYOYE ExisT CURB NG PAN[NENT AS NECESS.WF, TACK. AND JAM NEV R w PAVEUENT TO EST APAVEIOM {D I Q CURB ACCESS RAMP PER 50 207 WITH TRIMCED r 7 I DOMES PER CA STNNAWIS rtrPI 0 S1AMEAR0 PAAIING SPACE. T119'R O'W/P® 11VFANNGl9' R TO9PER DETAL RTPI f j I 05 "ED PARKING PER AICBTECTURAL PLN6 © 01CYCLE PARADE PER GCTA, BVP9 0 TRASH ENLLOSM[ /R F-sGETN WALL NO I SELF-CLOSNC. SEEP LATCNWG 6ATC PER Itm� - G'K 75• PASSENGER PROP OFF/LOADING ZOIEITTPI Q9 CONCRETE SIOCWALR PER SO 200 CTVPU PEDESTWIA CROSSULR ITm Rhl Slop SIGN RETANPO WALL PER ARCNTIECTW NBI IT Z, STRUCTURAL OR"M am SECIDMTT BARRIER am Exisil G FENCE TO BE Kw m y/ ®PnOFnsm DpESiG HAru SGv1C0 rtm PRwasul MINT" SEANCE Elm PROPOSED 6-FIRE SEW510E Elm ,® FROPDs® FNE HWxNU 1i OD © SCR[EMALL PEA IA USCAPE PLAN ® TAPE 1 CONCRETE SCERALA SCUPPERS PEA SD AG ® TTPE E SWEWALN SC- PER SO 20S ® TYPE A SNA:LE UTCN BASH W/1 U-1 CRATE TO SD 709 WMM7 RM. TREATIQR WT BRA51 CJP. ® G UUMOU CAIN OASW W/2 U-1 GRATES 15hEp ZE PER Sp 709 W/F06T FLUSH 1REATMENi IM17 POW 1 ® ME A NODIFUM CATCH RAAN W/7 EF-1 GAMS : PER SD S09 R UST FLUSH TREATMENT PUT P[R® 11RRHHjj1 1 ® TIDE A YOOF® UTG BASIN W/A EF-1 NAME PER SO 709 1/FH6T FLMH TREATMENT oNT PTA " ® TAPE A MODIFIED CATCH WIN W/S EF-16AAR5 I PER 30 70 W/FNST TEAMIFICATMENT UM1 PEP CATCH WIT PEER 50 SOS ./FH 1 TREATMENI11WI1 PER® I' r r G'A 7S'LDApMG 201E I ® G10P NLE7 PER "I s0 C-B.TS le t 1 ® Z[IRIB UPENING 1/ ® A'CURB OPM14G R'CIRG OPERINW r CURB DPFHIMG R/1 ME 9-POs, RARHICADE PER SO .1 is � (j ® C'CURB OPENINGW/1 TYPE 'POST BARRICADE PFA 50 pi ,. + �• ® N'CIFB OPOONG WR TYPE S-POST BANAICADES J S. O[ PER m RN OP[NWG 1/7 T1PC 9-P051 BARRI[ApEs® II •li 1 /-- 5'OC PER SO $06 ® CHU VERTICAL CUB WITH 7' TWRNAL SECTIGI PER SO 2G ;I TYPE A D UtCOAIEGRATES PER 50 30911FPST /L16N TREATMENT G97 PE E rib MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR MILLER RANCH ,�` P O- lA PORTION K FINE SOUTNEAST OBYtor SUM xTINIMSvRSrNRANMUEGWT. GRA • OV9-0402 SAIF1VFA YERIOLUM,IOOF Dm NLLl[Y.PWA LPNTT.YII1dLL DATE: NOVEWBER 17, 2009 ..E. r-7D• IMO R INTOINN• P SHEET 7 OF 11 Ar J CMTOM IRIEERVAI. - r —ILL E ;4Z L-T - sr ly 7— 7 Lill,, It j Q? j "o A , . IT . SEE SHEET 0 CIA STONES PROP 7 16. BU I LDW' 6 E CLUTAM- 0.4 IIG FASOi'IT ;L7 601TCLI D7.3 OFFICE 25. IT ICtA 22.5. SF 1125D 9 ITT n IIJESD Cl fl. A ATIOM FFE If,PAC BASIN 5 E3 ul Tim wncmz DO.Q O 'PA-TE AIM OF AAT ­CRERl CA 70 TUCECRI GAS "" aEC7"' FOR ELECTRIC N' AR:) DISIAHUTTI DOCAll 4474 PA'"GEITS 'k , � O'S.V.02 CC TRAIL 991 L1.12 109L KEYNOTES (j) WW G-Tipt 2 WTIM CURB PER SIT BOB am BAR CUT AT r uwniuK REMOVE Exin CURB A'C) SETBA" porliEta AS NECESSART.IACk M XW RM 'H e 110 PAVDIDT 10 EXIST PAV I u t11 1 CURB ACCESSa W KII M M? AIM "CATED (WRITES, M, " 51"WARDS ("m ILL Q STAIR)ARE) PARRIC SPACE, MIT X it 1113-IM YERMGIWK 201 PER DETAIL am Q CGINCT, fAAVMG KIT ARCUTTECTURX KIUIS BUCTME PM3AM PER BETAX. gym OWEYIP <D F— EACT.OSICu M-SCAEN .0,IX Arm MF OSPIC. 2 F{ATCICWRG GAVE PER fllfl%,� VACP C .. L . zOwe"', a Q9 CORMIER ME.— PER SIT IM am @ KriumAtt auSSi... am R'l STOP SIGH RE1AWPi WALL PER ARCHITECTUFLAL MCI STRUCTUM ORAWRIVS ffm al .4E SECURITY BARRIER 0W) OUR)CL a .1 1 - T� c BETAMING It E LASEENT orm rr� 10 BE �co DOCKI 0" PIG[ 79 PATIMIC11 [1-301C HATER SERVICE am —TV EXECT COMET 9036 PC 72 PROPoSFD mu;'AR SMITE c— A. .0010C.I.CC ACES ..—I PC us V4 px°PBSm'Foo, SMvICC am "q E ' 4, I V4 PRoMsEn , MIGRANT JSCAM ALL PER LAROSCAPE PLAN VVE I CONCRETE SMMK SCUPPERS MR SO 204 TWE 2 SUNALK SCIPPM PER SO TITS 22. SO SOS WMAST TYPE 4 SIRRXE CAFI.USH TTCA MMAITINT Wi. 9/1 EF-I T MTE PER (D TTPE 4 D� CATCH BASH1/2 EF-I GRATES AR'. PER W TO, 4"ST FLUSA TREATMENT WT KAW IfIlM CA— BASIN W43 EV-1 MITES PER SIT lo,s WlIRS7 FTu5W NEA01tila MI PER TIPS 4 ACIDIFIED CATO BASIN W/4 U-1 GRATES KB SIT 309 ."ST KumTREANUIT OMIT KAM M 4 MODIFIED CATCH BASIN W^ AF-I GRATES 0 PER SO 30 IIlFWTa FLUSA ITRAIM)a ITIFT PEP�V TV 4 MITIET) CAT" BASIN ft� EF-I GRATESM A A PER SO SITS lf-ST r­ TAEATNWI RANT PLR I. TO Ir. 35-LOUDIFIC Ull FL 0 DROP M.ET PER AOC)l BIT C-6.75 MtT-GOM 0MB G rFC LlII P_ s,cure wo 11-CUIM, PER 50 106 05.11 VCUM CPM= II/ I TYPE I-PaST ARABI K. SIT .6 WCURA CIPERIT. ./2 TYPE I'MST BARRICADES w CURB TIVERATI; An TM 9-POST EAATTUCQE S.. PC, M BIG VIC VMTI— CURB WIN 3' TOMM. SECaOtR PER ze CUR I TM 4 MODIFIED CATM WIN IVA Er -I MATE5 MAY I B FL Rse PEA 0 305 W/FAIST FMH TREATMENT MI POW OFFICII 3LS BY rmoo sr pi n I6.2. 7 . R MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR FEW 3 fflI. . . . . . . . , IT 2 invds MILLER RANCH • 9DT'BEITC 3A4KAlIN OF TIE ­1 ITUARTER CR OV12-08-07 SECTION To —RV, .1 _IW, —a a WT. olu A 0'V'X)4-02 IT IUKR tOCARTIAR.TOWN or m ­v.PwA t:Uutal.AAaotA. SEE 2NEET 7 OATE, NOYMER iT. 2009 sCAtz P.Bcr .,— wao—, SHEET 0 OF — ­11— 11-11-1— vu iL 1.lt• m 1 1 VPAIVATE MATT 01 111 EASp E.MAHTEO 10 111GSON GAS MO ELECiRiC Im ELECTRIC RAW AUCTNIE CpPAM Pp WC[EI 1 PALE EIS O km- I SEE SHEET 10 SEE SHEET jgtl':'�'[.'1 I 1 it KEYNOTES HER 6.71PE E TUT IM CM PER 5O M IITR 4 Q SA. M AT VNMLLALRFwvE ERIST CIM AM i' PAVE" A5 DISTNECESSARY. 7ACA, AM JBN IER � 9 � •T P1E`1( � PATEAENt TO ElIST PAVEVFRI pJ I A QI A. ACCESS RAID PEA m MY NRR TRUNCATE. �'• I CHAD PER ABA STANOAIOS IIYPI ST.YCAlO POKING SPACE. TYR'A IT-R/3-M .n OVENINHul IT MY PER OETAOL mPt QV C 'J'' I I # ( ( Q C0V. PAAMG PER IJCNTE-- nAxs er NILDAw I 1 �lI 1 © BICYCLE POKING PER ORAL rtTR SFIBACA 5 © TRASH EUCHRE V/ SCRECN .ALL AND 1 n I I •( 5Y11- 111G, SELF-LAICAM GATE PER ITTR,� ijlujli �. Q W. n' PA55EEICER BRM OAF/LOAOIIC S ITM QV CONERIE IlCENALK PER 50 200 (TAI PEGESTRWI GOSS.ALR M. RETAORNG .ALL PER AKNTECTIRIAL .10 +IE 1 I I STRICIIAAL ORA.INGS ITYR • 5ECMTT BARRIER QYR I IR 0 EXISTING ME TO 1E MOVED PROMSEO DOYESIIC .170 SERVICE ITYPI PROPOSED NRIGATIOR RAVRX ITVPI 1 IF I M 0 VE7 i I© m9Posm Y/BIE SpVIQ (TRI PROPOSED FIPE xTDUxT �� ff ® 3CRLEx.AY. Pp LAm_f 1'lAn TYPE I CONCRETE SIOEFALE SAPPERS PER SO 204 TYPE 2 SOEVALK WUPPER PEA 50 MS TYPE 1 SAOLE 4TCH BASH .11 EF-1 GAVE PER SD A09 ./(IRS, ELI6N TIfJ7YQ/1 ONIi TYPE . OOUNE CA7CNBASIN ./2 EF-1GAAIES N FP PEA SD AOS ./FIRST FL1t91 TREA711EAT MY PEN® a ® TTEE . MOUT D CATCH BASIN ./5 EF-1 GAMES Pp SD 505 "MY FWSH TREATYpI WI PER® I- TTPE . NREF pEO CATCH BASIN ./1 -1 MIE3 PER SA 11 ./F0151 F"M TRIATIANI MY PER® TM . YlpfitD CATCH BASIN ./S FE-1 MAIES PEA 0 SOS V M57 '— TREA,IEAT MY Pp ® TIDE . IRLRY]EI) CATCH BASIN 1/7 EF•I MAUS i 1 1. I 1 �•' PER SO 30 ■/FIRST FLOSI IREA,AEDIT UNIT PER® JJf A5-LOKYAK 2ONE 1:. II I 5., i ® CHOP KEY PER AOOT SO C-M75 WITMA OEEO v 1yN� . ( ® rcious OPEIIWC UTA04NG VE USEM9T FCINd OT',"M GOCKAI TSO], C 1 e'Ow [LRa OPENING OOCREw F]IIA ENT ® A-MB WENNG An TAPE 9-POSE BAARCAOE Ovp E'A1y+:, OP S i� F- PER SO CS -CM O pmG 1/1 TYPE I -MST BARRICADE PEA so V. AI'LAHOS[APE I WCIS® OPENING An ITPE 9'POSI BAPNICAOES WE(ERYAN 40, BUII.pIHGI I I ® 20'Me OPENING ./5 TYPE WPOST eARHIC OP -SETBACK 1. M Y0C PER W COP I yy I! 0 ® Elio VERTICAL MB MTN A' MANY" SE[TI0v PEA so 2Q NN �y TYPE . VIO CATCH BASIN EE-I GRATES JM PER 50 O09 /rBIST TURN IIRAIAIxpT LINT PER QV MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR z `g. MILLER RANCH c v'Nwo BERG A PoRTION M TIE SUITIEAST 011uip v O S-0-08-07 AMCI't_ AROIR.— I. swlx ..ICE u CAST. GRA a OV9-09-02 SARI Rlvp YENgAILTOM ar ORB YAIL[T,PIW [ow11.ARQOw. DATE. NOVEMBER 4, 2009 S[uL M1b' CPftQA9 NlpvAt•T SHEET 9 OF 11 SIER SHEET 11 t I G i 1 t y'. n L '+• FIT / U • C' KEYNOTES fs.� 1 - 1 •T 1]L " \;' 1 t .�h"._ {: �� ti` i f:l / j s Li /'1 a i y I m Aw . CD *1 6-TYPE 2 MIKA. MRS PER 50 zos -I'- 5 '",�, •, )} P \ ! rt 1 2 sar mt ar PwINNORA REMOVE UIST CURS um ' I ON PROPw f L 1 `({ `• �lY'� 1 o BU I DING 1 2 1 ' 1 •,I„ O PAN AS NECESURY.TAC4AN0 MN NEW LINE \ i f y �.i• W L� mEyf-x p 1Y/L. ® ♦ 6A nd01 SF t -`1• • bll`L �jrNif• ` \ '-` 9' f/ AF21 STj 61 f r 1 1 5 E �. PAVEYEIIi TO CEIST PAYEYFNT , (f l Ql CURB ACCESS IWP PER SO 207111TH TRUNCATED y t I Rs13 oohs PER AOa SIANO.ws rtYPI f i ` L ,..� s i c+IINc l� t9P g r' .? ,?Ra�E1.ow+Is itl 7z wAx i } sE w• FTE MSG a 0 STANDARD PARAINc SPACE, Tmv: m R/r® (l - ✓ cr\' 1 - P ASE - {i ` PAD 2U ( RETONINL 1 EASEMENT 'OOCRFI Ie IS ILLS 159'L 0 ]0 D9mNwILI DYR MITER DETAIL mTPI } i F y i• L� Q�9 L-02 L l �• \.. 23TO� _.' ARma1r.OErp �Larrta N1111 Al r {pr S COVERED PA9CML PER I]ICIEiEttORAL PLANS L,B]FI.6 9O]E. PL 1Q Y' 4_�.✓ Q i dPM�RTE RKNT D< R1Y EASEAIFM \ ^ \ FS Se r r5wlxc E rt 10 0 0.ED R \ � � v _ t ' -IiW'0 I''f0'nl'MCE AyRIEwERT © el[T[lE IMRML PER OCIAE RTPI 1F9R'f1E[TPI[ NRRASTRDCiWE \ ` \ •1 �`+ a 1/ (, 907f PcYFS' r_ COMPANY Pm DDCLAT A22B PACE 627 ( lW 215 y� la•6 SE/ i Q TRASH ENCLOSURE VAT•SCRFE& TALL RWHO JT I � \.,�,� � 'e. •'/C T A � _ _ i� � _ i SFV-0.05MC, SCLfi1TCNIx4 LATE PER rf1PIQJ�yJ R31.7 r'7 \ FGal x33 6 : I 1 T' _ I t• 1I �� \ 1� 1' . - AS L • c 'Y ,Cr - 1T B j O 2a ]7' PASSENGER DROP OrF/LOADVIL xa+EnYN fLM \ Fc 240 1 01" . 4,i..- ,� \\iI \ F�}�•� + - ` 4/ F51 f _I Q9 CpoliEiE SOCr4R PEA 50 200 (TYPE -[hits 1 TiGRT I: Qj-. ` 'FL xTO I, 1'BULLDNG- '� La —�-.— � PEDESTRIAN CAOSSWALa (TIN •`� 1 f"i \P 'F Qi pL.l ` :1 RI: ' Fc n� — u \ , -PILE lil _J Q Rl-f STOP ST. RETAuN m RYE Pm momial...LL A10 I } ? �'E ; I : R u Wsii q' �1j .. r . ` y I _ > • s1RIKTInAL DEMINIS nml ' w„i \E, i L 1 � \ xt9 � - p e., sroRT emEDNc 7 I �.-� ❑ 'P Q SE[INIn e1RN0 nrPl \ AwuElxumn� j..�lpWA9Ls �° m I [NSTML i01[E f0 DE REwDVm 263 Lri \\\ jnP�p N .i_ \ .kl '. zr u12 '1 I p L O� 0� •"._ .. `J 1 1 ? II 0 PROPOSED UCUESTIC NITER SERVICE ETV PROPOSED IRRIGATION SERVICE [TYPE PROPOSED 0•FPC SCIVICE ITTPI PaoEnsm FIRE xYMMxT I 1 / i T EF 1 �� ' Q SCREENWALL Pm LARDSCAPE PLAN I ,s.S., -•..:� , ' i .` '�tn m '� TYPE 1 CONERCEE SMERN.A SCUPPERS PER 50 204 1 c®nrE : smENwN sLaTrm PER so ms t. SD ]D9 NIFTIEST E C1T01 BASIN T✓I FF-I PER I R4 1T I FUNIT LVSN TREATMENT HER, 1 D m- EAo PON A LINE CROSSES TYPE 1 CELIAC CA1CX AMIN 9/2 EF•1 OATES PRCPmrr ENE Ei n.l 1 E o 1 N\yys / —_ 7 O _' } 1 1 Y+'L /VY PTA ` PER SO 309 A/rIR51 FWSN IR[AlApll wNlt rTR® 1 f1 _ W irTxo NEeAR J I L ? Vwnc.L` c ® PT 1 A9 VEXED E FL BASIN 0/7 ET -I WI ES PE IVE Et FY m.0 I tl, { I le. I AT PARCEL C0rE1l S1A' IS: W EL VI 11.9 1 BASIY a PER 709 VEASI ilOSN IREAIIENI 0m1 Irt LIriT PEfl SD 1'O1 g, // �' .-.I}I ® TIP E / wwwo EATON BAsm T/A R-1 0UIf9 N• I / .• I PER SD NIT T/PWSI FLESH TREATMENT MOT PEEI® 1 yOI1DE GET + LfA n,le0 SF -n - / ® TAPE 1 NECTFB'A CAICW BASIN N/S U WAlCS VMJ GEF•`; PER SO 309 r/FWST PUSH rN[ATIERT UNIT Pm i 1 •.• [RFA IM EASEUERi 1 Ma..2q . \ TYPE / Sim ED CATCH HASN %/I EF•1 MATS r• FMND AMA R 3 AR 1[ N5i rIMFNf '' 1 BImBINO.MFILXT - ' I y; - t .. 1 Y: I i eoTTo F } m,� y t\) E 1 / PER so 7D9 r/FMST FwsX rNAr4ENt Mn PER 'NIiTG. [rLINQE2- ) ax reERrr uIE `i _ •; / + T� } I w�l a�E s NT = n • 1 ! f � )\ /(\ ! / ® Q' a )S' LOAONL xWE rj zzo 'I 1 4- °' s .I 1 fLQV I" pED 1 I1 ® ORW MEET PER ANT SO C-675 i"slaw r � f j 1 ® tun OPMHC •• E ll FR YASN L G fR.% S R is I s zl V I /N�• 1 ®rMRS OPEM.c r nATLon PLAN f N .; .�L = I rc. © I -r / I / ® c CURB OPENING I l 1 I r } ax]INc �: a• .. m } (�J,y(. J i i / e• rum EMxc T/I TYPE PE I•POST eARRICA 4 lI/ !j/!. / ,/�• ! ® PER 50 Tlf 6:&5 }/lI/ 1 / ✓ / l lV ® WCIFm OPEIR i 1/1 TYPE I•POST BARRICADE ;I / 4' f - - 4/. A f5 d Q �{ 1 }� I y/ h�/ I / ('•l t ® N'DRm OPENING rR TYK I•POSI BARRICADES I11 ' w - 7 l / _ ' I I l ii _ @a� 1 �, /' 1 s• OC PER SO ms } Ki s +\.Rs i s �b �..f 9 R i S I I =«�, i Gl6t �0�➢ ! i ® 2TCMm OPENING ■n TYPE I'PDST IMICADES lI.'"1 `•... J' lI � L'0E'Yl.u6 i FO W9 1x0 ft f. _ 7 2 _ 9 P p1'F� 1 I I / TOC PEN SO TOE END VEA71[Al [1Pe TI1N ]'TE]NINAL SECTION PER __. _ ri •_' �/ T 7T ., '" +B,s�:,] s 1.� i_ll S r Jlfll 1 ®EO:Q I I� � / �T l _ 1 r r _ y � 1�l it f ® PIPE 1 )IN,NODIFICO CATCH SH T E T EF•I GI11E5 jM T - Y ¢ T ' � ' � { (ry 1 E'] � 7 PER SO 709 T/FNSI RVSN TREATMENT MITI PER ujma MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR TTyy 7� y��y�7,/-�SETBa lA�ll.�d'iJL4 ��1�I V..+H �•• YYI BEING A PoI1110N f6 THE 50Vl1ElST W1RTU OF OV 12—OB-07 SCCTId .7GWWSWPE EMIN F S W K UY, M EAST. YT.A..a / 9 "' i ` A ' M1M1M1T:-••JJJ 9AL1 RI'IER IERI04L TlNIN Of OW Y4MT, PI4A CWNIT, MRQON.1. i ''�' E 1 • I 1 � /� ♦b \tih .t \ -' is 1 I I OV9-04-02 � OATEI NOVEAIBER 17, 2009 scnE, Pao• Eoxtow RNERVLL• P SHEET 10 OF 11 Nr.,mnF;..e•ararm\Benfnri0G6r.urAAcaA,trolecle4sPSfO,.20DS.IlK,bU1 ,Ep PPO+.20J`..LL'E.xr ,r.7EEE.Larn'aLSE.iAJ r.cr• xwl2Bln an KEYNOTES HER G-TYPE 2 VERTICAL CLAM PER SO 209 (TYPI H12.1b• OS SA CITY AT tUlAwY. MOW EXIST CLAW RAD PAWNENT AS NECESSARY.UMAND JOIN NEW PI.T III I III I C"', CXNE3 CMISAPNWD0, "- T D STMIAD PARK C SPACE. ITPIV X III R/3'a) oviRmHo W A TOY PER DETAL TIM %.V J0. Q COVE RED FARATAC PER ARC HITECIIAIAL PLANS CLINICAL. ITTET71 I.,' GICIM P__ PER ICETAL. YWT q, ` I i I —' Qt .1" CHTLI 1112'ICREEN WALL AND j!j24!j) DATE M LLYFI%J� u ONE .23.6 A. ,4JNQIJElD I V LIE (D (D CONCRETE SEDERALI PER SO 2DO TIM Q PtEXPRIAN CH.I.mw - -Or RI,I STOP SIN ARJ. -ij RIA 0 V, 1 1 14�11 REIARIMC RILL. PIN AACTATECTLAAL AND *CCU A I TAFT PIPE ROAD I.. PRMTORN. WARMS (7YP) .4 REC ROAD P :4tv U4kIS,7T` ROAD 43 St�lpfttfl ITARRIM IWI 'Ab -7. . CLARITY EXTSIM FENCE TO BE AWWO :33 PREIRCISM DONCESTIC WAYS SERVICE (TYPT v F1 j, IL 3 B 5 rtx F:l .1 ROTOR '.CT9' "RCTNOT —wo M.T- MY"a am nN 5CPAUTE lbSTIORIEN., PRIBAN SE"ClE (WI PROPOSED 6 @ rRaPosm nm wonmil 1� BUILD#, P,;Z"p wm— SEREENNALL PER LANDSWE PLAN �m mao it Ymm OF I V Z WE I CURRETY: SIDEN" SCUPPERS PER M II)A IT ER•TYPE 2 SCIEWAIR SAPPER PER 50 2-1 6 1, BUILD I TYPE 4 SINCLE C ­7 ATE" BASIN IMATE PER gA 0 MIT �MT ROE THEA I cl TIP 4 DOORLE CATCH MR wn U-1 AR 11TH 7AC I FL PER M � W"ST RUTH TREATUEAT"WOMM(D IS IT. ON E 4 AIRCIFICI) U70 BASAN 2f3 CF-I CRITICS 610-SECIIN L7 M.. Is Is f A' 1 TIN. CAN.M.7m POSITION 10LETACHIS p 3r PER 0 309 IFRP FILM —WENT M, PIT, % CORNER AM OF 5 7 FIT CRA PAC TV 4 ACCIF10 CATCH MAIL W/4 Er-1In 2 V PER SO 309 W/FMT FlOSIN TRICAITENT LAST PEA® TTPE 4 NODITIED "I" WIN W/S 6-1 CUM PER 50 309 W/ITYP FLASH TREATMENT ARAL PEA(@ m4 m CATCH MEN wn u-1 CRATES A. 0"IIMIm �i1WQ EAR TYPE movira PER 50 309 PITIRST � TREATMENT U47 PERICp IFN Ppc QK .5A> TWO MET PLO MCI 0 C r Cm OTHER; @ V CLINT OPERINC G'C" TrCCNWWC a' Ma OPENING ./I WE I-P3ST BARRICADE (@ SI^bENT'.. PER SO 05 N 1 48 pr CLNW PENANC BIT TYPE VICSI WARTIME .,PU I LV I NT, 'AHE f 'IT RS PERM X% mijs in_ Ar El M OPCNOIG V3 TYPE 9-POST BARRICALOES W, joiT amm M Tig -4 BE PER w RX s it MITI TIM Mt� CURB WITH Y TERMAL SECTION PER T' ( " E , - m� I P C, "w• V-PANITE RICO a At EASEUENT ?E IAS u-ciff"t E ACREELINT SIT 2e T"'ti 18 TYPE 4 MOTOPrIED CATCH BASIN 9/6 ff-I SUITS 41LAIIj "D �CTO I YATRAY­ 23.5 T III, I'Z PER CX)EWEI Q?. PACE L23 h PER SIT 309 WFIRST fl� IREATWENT TINY m TCI z MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR 1 \• 2c. (G 99 C. or Ed — MILLER RANCH .1 A PORTION Of THE S. CALLYIE OV12-08-07 CI. 11 SIWITICTURTY ..E.T..- 6 3 .1. OVS-04-02 ­10­101—OVALL[I.PlU• lOLNT­jO­_ PORI TIMING SIZE O01M19T 1 RAT lEHT— RITEWI­ I SHEET 11 OF 11 NOVEMBER 17,2009 SCALE, .m MINUTES ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD REGULAR SESSION May 11, 2010 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE CALL TO ORDER REGULAR SESSION AT OR AROUND 6:00 P.M. Vice Chair Schoeppach called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Michael Schoeppach, Vice -Chair Ray Shelton, Member Gene Wowk, Member Richard Luckett, Member Dennis Ottley, Member EXCUSED: Jill Anderson, Member PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Vice Chair Schoeppach led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. CALL TO THE AUDIENCE Opened and closed without comment. CONSENT AGENDA Vice Chair Schoeppach requested to move the April 13, 2010, minutes to be heard first on the Regular Agenda. A. Review and/or approval of the April 13, 2010, DRB meeting minutes. REGULAR AGENDA A. Review and/or approval of the April 13, 2010, DRB meeting minutes. Vice Chair Schoeppach requested grammatical changes to the minutes. The requested changes have been noted. MOTION: A motion was made by Member Shelton and seconded by Member Luckett to approve the April 13, 2010, DRB meeting minutes as amended. MOTION carried, 5-0 Election of Development Review Board chair and vice chair. MOTION: A motion was made by Member Shelton and seconded by Member Wowk to elect Vice Chair Schoeppach as Chairman of the Development Review Board. MOTION carried, 5-0 MOTION: A motion was made by Member Ottley and seconded by Member Shelton to elect Member Wowk as Vice -Chair of the Development Review Board. Member Wowk is elected Vice Chair of the Development Review Board by acclamation. 2. OV12-08-07 & 07A, Desco Southwest, represented by Rick Engineering Company, requests approval of a master development plan, development plan for phase 1 & 2, master landscape plan and landscape plan for phase 1 & 2 of the Miller Ranch Development, located on the northwest corner of Tangerine Road and La Canada Drive. For questions and additional information, please contact David Ronquillo, Senior Planner, at (520) 229- 4817 or dronquillo@orovalleyaz.gov. Michael Sarabia, non resident, representing the applicant presented the proposal and reviewed the following: - Location map - Project site - Overall project layout - Site plan - Commercial site plan - Phase I Tech Park - Phase II Tech Park - Phase III Tech Park - Grading and drainage concept - Landscape concept - Wash restoration concept will bring the wash back to what it was before Miller Ranch Mr. Sarabia said the project meets Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised (OVZCR). Member Wowk asked if there has been resistance from the neighborhood (AF Sterling). Mr. Sarabia responded no resistance has been received on the latest plan and they have worked with the neighbors in the past and made modifications. Member Luckett asked for a description of the Tech Park category and asked if the applicant had possible tenants. Mr. Sarabia responded the category of Tech Park includes medical office, clean rooms and light manufacturing. Mr. Sarabia said the applicant has been working with some bio tech firms and clean room operators that are interested in the area. Chairman Schoeppach requested that the landscape plan proposal be reviewed at this time. Mark Fellinger, of Rick Engineering, non resident, said native and drought tolerant material has been used, 30 foot buffers on all sides of the project, with a diverse plant list. The focus has been more on wash restoration elements and the proposal is to restore the wash to what was there previously. An enhancement of what remains of the natural wash will be the focus area. On the east side of the wash between the wash and the development there will be a 5 foot trail that will run the entire length of the project and should be useable most of the time. The material will be a native soil with a stabilizer. There will be a couple of seating areas along the trail. The trail will connect to the development in three areas. Some water harvesting has been incorporated into the wash restoration area. The plants will be irrigated in the beginning, then rely on water harvesting. Member Wowk asked if water harvesting off the building was planned. Mr. Fellinger responded no water harvesting at the discharge points off of the building is planned. Member Luckett asked if the wash restoration plan would move forward like the development plan from the south to the north or would the wash restoration be an early phase that would be completed before any new construction starts. Mr. Sarabia responded the wash restoration would be phased along with the project and the applicant is looking into water harvesting off of the building along with solar for the site. David Ronquillo, OV Senior Planner, presented the staff report and said the project will be developed in four different phases. Mr. Ronquillo said phase 1 and 2 are both in conformance with all of the zoning code requirements and had a total of 8 buildings including a bank. Mr. Ronquillo reviewed the following: - Location map -only the eastern portion of the area is before the DRB - Master plan - The entire development (east of the wash) would include 13 buildings and approximately 189K square feet The project provides pedestrian connectivity and court yards with amenities. The developer has provided extensive landscaping. A transit station has been provided along with carpool spaces. Mr. Ronquillo stated all four components of the project meet the general plan policies and OVZCR requirement's and staff recommended approval with the conditions in Exhibit A. Mr. Ronquillo explained one of the conditions in Exhibit A will require the applicant and staff to discuss further how the wash restoration will be implemented. Chairman Schoeppach asked if Sunkist Road currently exists. Joe Andrews, OV Civil Attorney, said the road is an unimproved county road that has been called Sunkist. Bill Adler, OV resident, said the applicant and staff indicated that there has never been any public comment. Mr. Adler said when the property was rezoned the Town did not have in place the ordinance that requires the neighbors be educated with regard to their entitlements as well as the entitlements of the property owner. Mr. Adler strongly recommended the DRB insist that a neighborhood meeting be held. These educational meetings are required by our (Town) ordinance. Member Wowk asked if any neighborhood meetings have taken place. Mr. Sarabia responded that meetings have been held and have resulted in the building heights and setbacks being changed to accommodate the neighbors concerns. Adelina Kempner, OV resident, said she is a board member of Vistoso Gateway and as far as she knows none of her neighbors are aware of what is going on. Ms. Kempner asked if the mesquite trees being planted are native trees. Ms. Kempner asked to stop the process so that neighbors can be educated as to what is going on. Mr. Ronquillo said the trees being proposed are on the approved plant list and that neighbors have been notified of the proposal but only two people have sent an email expressing concern. This project was submitted before the new ordinance that requires neighborhood meetings be held. Mr. Ronquillo said meetings have been held as part of the General Plan Amendment and Rezoning process for this project. Notices have been sent out to the neighbors and there have been no comments from the neighbors. Staff did not require a neighborhood meeting because there have been no comments from the neighbors. Any input that was received has been taken into consideration and modifications made. Member Ottley asked how many homes in the subdivision and how many residents have been notified. Member Luckett asked if when the architectural plans start coming in will the Town renotice to the neighbors. Mr. Ronquillo responded renotice is not required. Chairman Schoeppach asked if the applicant was in agreement with the items on Exhibit A, Mr. Sarabia affirmed that they are aware of the items on Exhibit A and the applicant is in agreement. Member Wowk asked if the applicant would be willing to have a neighborhood meeting. Mr. Sarabia responded that the applicant has had numerous meetings throughout the process and was not willing to put the project on hold. MOTION: A motion was made by Member Ottley and seconded by Member Shelton to approve OV12-08-07 & 07A, master development plan, development plan for phase 1 & 2, master landscape plan and landscape plan for phase 1 & 2 of the Miller Ranch Development, located on the northwest corner of Tangerine Road and La Canada Drive, subject to the conditions in Exhibit A. MOTION carried, 5-0 3. OV12-10-03, Kelly Copeland, represented by Coronado Engineering & Development Inc., requests approval of a development plan and landscape plan for Villa Fatima skilled nursing facility, located on the northwest corner of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and Sun City Boulevard. For questions and additional information, please contact David Ronquillo, Senior Planner, at (520) 229-4817or dronquillo@orovalleyaz.gov. Paul Nzomo of Coronado engineering, presented the proposal. Mr. Nzomo reviewed the proposed site and showed views from all areas. Mr. Nzomo reviewed the location. He continued and reviewed the existing zoning (C-1) and said the maximum height allowed is 24 feet. The developer adjusted the height to 16 feet because of neighbor concerns. Mr. Nzomo said meetings have taken place with the neighbors and with the Sun City HOA. Mr. Nzomo explained the grading and fill that would need to take place. Kelly Copeland, non resident, owner and developer said the original building was built with the neighbors concerns considered and modifications were made such as the height of the roof. The roof was kept low at 16 feet and flat. Other input included landscape concerns that were also included. This proposal will be similar to what is currently in place and once again neighbors concerns were addressed and the changes have been included in the current proposal. The biggest neighborhood opposition has been the use; an Alzheimer's facility. Mr. Copeland said this development will bring 40-50 skilled jobs to the area. Member Wowk asked what the current building is used for. Mr. Copeland responded the building is empty. David Ronquillo, OV Senior Planner, presented the staff report and reviewed the following: - Location - Resident concerns (noise, parking, building height and mass, circulation, landscaping, 24/7 operating hours) Mr. Ronquillo said the applicant has gone through the neighborhood meeting process and has done as much as he can however, there are some neighbors that are not happy with the development. Mr. Ronquillo said in general the proposal meets all zoning code requirements with regard to parking, connectivity and passenger drop-off. The proposed architecture will be brought to the DRB at a later date. Mr. Ronquillo said in general the proposal is in conformance with all zoning code requirements with regard to the development plan. Mr. Ronquillo showed images of the site and pointed out that some of the improvements have not been completed but have been added to the conditions of approval on the current proposal. Mr. Ronquillo reviewed the landscape plan and said the plan meets all zoning code requirements. Mr. Ronquillo said the proposal meets all zoning code requirements and staff recommended approval subject to the conditions in Exhibit A. Member Ottley asked if the property has always been zoned C-1 Commercial. Mr. Ronquillo affirmed. Chairman Schoeppach called for a recess at 7:20 p.m. Chairman Schoeppach reconvened the meeting at 7:32 p.m. Chairman Schoeppach asked the applicant if they had seen the items on Exhibit A. Mr. Copeland said he agrees with the conditions on Exhibit A. Jan Atwood, OV resident, asked how to access the facility for people who are handicapped or arthritic. Mr. Nzomo responded and said that access will be in front of the building at the porte-cochere and handicap parking will be provided on the building level. Dr. John Wadleogh, OV resident, said there is a need for Alzheimer care not only in Oro Valley but all of southern Arizona. John Joers, OV resident, said he felt that Kelly Copeland was going to make a good neighbor. Rethea Browning, OV resident, said Mr. Copeland has been very nice and he has said that he owns 10 acres at Drexel and Irvington. Residents have asked Mr. Copeland to develop that area rather than his Oro Valley property. We are concerned that we will have a larger empty shell. The original homeowners in the area paid an extra 10K for their views and we are very concerned about the operation being open 24/7, the distance to our back yard and if Mr. Copeland raises our fences as he has said he would, we would lose our mountain views. Charles Sullivan, OV resident, said he has been misled and the whole thing is a big mistake. Mr. Copeland has offered to raise their wall and there is nothing natural about what is being proposed. Mr. Sullivan expressed concern regarding the building height. Jack Evert, OV resident, said he was involved as a member of DRC and was impressed with the way Mr. Copeland dealt with us (DRC) and followed through. Most people would be happy if there were no building being built but, we are a victim of the economy and it requires the lot to be raised. This is regrettable but Mr. Copeland has been credible and I hope that he will continue to strive to be a good neighbor to the people that will be directly impacted; the residents to the north. Neil Rydberg, OV resident, said he was in favor of the project. MOTION: A motion was made by Member Luckett and seconded by Member Shelton to approve OV12-10-03, Kelly Copeland, represented by Coronado Engineering & Development Inc., requests approval of a development plan and landscape plan for Villa Fatima skilled nursing facility, located on the northwest corner of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and Sun City Boulevard subject to the conditions in Exhibit A. Member Ottley stated the need for this type of facility is huge as Alzheimer's becomes an ever increasing problem in our society. In addition, he said he was impressed by the fact that Mr. Copeland has been so involved in the community, making a lot of changes to his proposal, and has neighbors in support of the plan. This is a project well worthwhile. MOTION carried, 5-0 4. OV12-10-08 and OV13-10-04, the Town Office of Conservation & Sustainability requests approval of architecture and landscaping associated with new covered parking that supports solar photovoltaic panels at the Town Hall Complex, located at the southeast corner of the La Canada Drive and Naranja Drive intersection. For additional information, please contact Bayer Vella, Office of Conservation & Sustainability Manager, at (520) 229-4810 or bvella@orovalleyaz.gov. Bayer Vella, Manager, OV Office of Conservation and Sustainability, presented the proposal and reviewed the following: - Energy Efficiency Conservation Block Grant - Performance contracting - Major improvement list Mr. Vella said the 1300 solar panels will provide 60% of the energy needs of all the buildings excluding the library on a yearly basis. Mr. Vella showed one solar panel and explained that the panels will serve as the roof of the covered parking. Mr. Vella reviewed the angles that the panels will be placed, continued and reviewed the following: - Impact design and color - Polycrystalline panels - Under canopy design - Landscape plan - Shade management - Parking island retrofit - Mitigation area- front entrance, library and police department Mr. Vella said work should begin in August 2010. Mr. Vella said the maintenance of the panel will require someone to mop the top to eliminate dust and periodically check for any frayed wires. Member Shelton asked how long it will take to pay the mortgage off. Mr. Vella responded payoff would be achieved in approximately 9 years. Mr. Vella reminded the DRB that financing has already been approved. MOTION: A motion was made by Member Shelton and seconded by Member Ottley to approve OV12-10-08 and OV13-10-04, the Town Office of Conservation & Sustainability requests approval of architecture and landscaping associated with new covered parking that supports solar photovoltaic panels at the Town Hall Complex, located at the southeast corner of the La Canada Drive and Naranja Drive intersection. Member Ottley added that solar is showing up everywhere, there are two golf carts with solar panels on the roof at the Heritage Highlands golf club. MOTION carried, 5-0 5. Planning and Zoning update. David Ronquillo, OV Senior Planner, reviewed items that will come before Town Council and the Planning & Zoning Commission. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: A motion was made by Member Ottley and seconded by Member Shelton to adjourn the DRB meeting at 8:23 p.m. MOTION carried, 5-0 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING DATE: May 11, 2010 TO: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD FROM: Paul R. Popelka, RLA/AICP, Acting Planning & Zoning Director SUBJECT: OV12-08-07 & 07A, Desco Southwest, represented by Rick Engineering Company, requests approval of a master development plan, development plan for phase 1 & 2, master landscape plan and landscape plan for phase 1 & 2 of the Miller Ranch Development, located on the northwest corner of Tangerine Road and La Canada Drive. SUMMARY: Nature of Application The project will consist of four phases with thirteen (13) buildings totaling 189,866 square feet. There are two zoning designations on the site: C-1, Commercial and T-P, Technological Park. Phase 1 & 2 will include buildings 1 - 8 and will provide bank, restaurant and office related uses. The remainder of the site, phase 3 & 4 will provide an 'office park" with primarily medical and professional office uses. The project will be developed in phases; therefore, a master development plan and master landscape plan is required. The purpose of the plans is to provide the overall layout and landscaping for the entire site. A separate development and landscape plan will be required for each specific phase. In this case, the applicant has submitted plans for phase 1 & 2. Proposed Improvements • Vehicular parking, passenger drop off, and loading zones • Transit station and car pool spaces • Pedestrian and courtyard areas • Restoration of wash on the western edge of property • One access point off Tangerine Road, three access points off La Canada, and a future connection to the west (crossing the wash) • Building heights range from 22 feet to 32 feet as permitted for architectural elements, and up to 34 feet for elevator shafts to accommodate the three northern buildings BACKGROUND: Current Site Conditions • Property is 20.97 acres • Zoning is C-1, Commercial District and T-P, Technological Park District • Site is vacant and undeveloped with the exception of several areas that have been previously graded • Residential uses to the west, east, south and north • Western boundary of property designated as "Significant Resource Area" in the General Plan Approvals To Date • October 2004: General Plan Amendment approved by Town Council • February 2007: Rezoning approved by Town Council • Conditional use permit for the bank drive through area (phase 1) currently being processed and is scheduled for May 19 Town Council. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Page 2 of 5 Surrounding Land Uses Direction Zoning Land Use North SR, Suburban Ranch — Pima Count Existing single family homes. South R1-7 Verde Ranch Subdivision (across Tangerine Road). East R1-36 Vistoso Gateway Subdivision (across La Canada). West R1-144 Existing single family homes. ANALYSIS OF OVZCR 22.6 B DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CRITERIA: The following is a list of noteworthy criteria (in italics) followed by staff commentary. A. General Plan This commercial project is in general conformance with applicable General Plan Policies. Noteworthy General Plan 2020 policies are listed below. Policy 2.1.4, "The Town shall require that all development proposals depict an arrangement of and massing of buildings and/or arrangement of lots to minimize impacts on views from adjacent properties and streets and from properties and streets internal to the proposed project while providing privacy for residents. " Policy 11.3.1, "View protection is to be an essential aspect of development review and project approval." The site is relatively flat and the development has been designed to minimize building dominance as viewed from Tangerine Road and La Canada Drive. The buildings range in height from one and two stories and are arranged to break up the parking areas and screen views of the site from the adjacent roadways. B. Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised (OVZCR) The Master Development Plan, Phase 1 & 2 Development Plan, Master Landscape Plan and Phase 1 & 2 Landscape Plan are in substantial conformance with all applicable OVZCR requirements. The following is a list of noteworthy items: • Section 27.7 & 27.8, Off Street Parking and Loading — 721 vehicular parking spaces, loading zone/passenger drop off area, transit station and car pool spaces. • Section 27.6E&F, Landscape, Irrigation and Buffer Yards — Adequate buffer yards and landscaping are provided along the perimeter of the property, internal building areas and parking islands. Screen walls are proposed along the roadway frontage. The master landscape plan provides a plant palette that will be maintained as each subsequent phase is developed and in conformance with the required plant list. • Section 24.1, Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District (TRCOD) — The protective frontage tracts, view sheds and building height restrictions have been met. • Section 23.4, Table of Dimensional Requirements — The project meets all setback, building height, open space and floor area ratio (FAR) requirements of this section. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Paqe 3 of 5 • Section 24.7, Riparian Habitat Protection Overlay District — The wash along the western edge of the property will be restored and is in conformance with these requirements. A third party consultant (RECON Environmental) was hired to work with the applicant and develop a wash restoration plan. A condition has been added on the plan to determine the construction phasing improvements for the wash. C. Addendum A Design Guidelines Compliance The Master Development Plan, Phase 1 & 2 Development Plan, Master Landscape Plan and Phase 1 & 2 Landscape Plan are in substantial conformance with all applicable design guidelines. The following is a list of noteworthy items: • Addendum A.6.c: "Loading and service areas should be screened from public view." Loading zone, passenger drop off and service areas are adequately screened from the adjacent roadways and surrounding area. • Addendum A.6.f.ii: "Design all parking areas to allow safe and attractive pedestrian circulation." Safe pedestrian circulation is provided between each building, wash trail and the adjacent roadways. Overall, a well designed pedestrian master plan is provided. • Addendum A.6.g.i: "Design multiple building projects with courtyards created by building placement, or otherwise define usable outdoor spaces." The overall layout provides a variety of building placements throughout the site creating multiple outdoor plaza and courtyard areas. Adequate pedestrian amenities such as planters and seating benches are provided within these areas. • Addendum A.1.e: "Design buildings so that orientation and height are sensitive to adjacent land uses." The site has been designed to provide a variety of building placements. The buildings achieve adequate setbacks and buffers from the adjacent residential uses. D. Rezoninq Conditions As a result of the rezoning process, specific conditions for this property must be met. The outstanding rezoning conditions will be addressed prior to the completion of the development plan process. The conditions are specified on "sheet 3" of the master development plan/phase 1 development plan. E. Public Works Comments Drainage Existing storm water runoff drains across the site in a northeast to southwest direction. The storm water is conveyed predominately by natural swales and overland sheet flow, ultimately discharging into an existing wash that runs along the west side of the project. The portion of existing wash that abuts the property will be restored as a part of this project in accordance with the rezoning conditions to create a natural riparian habitat to mimic the pre -disturbed condition. The post developed stormwater will be discharged and released from the project site in a way that mimics existing conditions. The on -site runoff will be conveyed across the site through a combination of catch basins, curb openings, culverts, swales, constructed channels, and surface flow. Eight detention basins will attenuate the stormwater discharge so that there is no increase in peak flow or negative impacts to the downstream areas. In accordance with the rezoning conditions, restoration of the entire wash abutting the length of the west property line will be a part of this project. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Page 4 of 5 First flush treatment is incorporated into this project and consists of filter inserts placed within catch basins. The first flush filters are designed to capture sediment, debris, trash, oils, and grease from parking lots and access lanes. Grading A Type 2 Grading Permit will be required to construct building pads, drainage structures, utilities, parking lots, and any other structures requiring grading on the project site. The grading represented within the Master Development Plan and Phase 1 Development Plan conforms to the requirements of Chapter 27.9 of the Town's Zoning Code as well as the stipulations and development criteria of the Town's Subdivision Street Standards. Traffic A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was created for this project to analyze the placement and dedicated turn lane requirements for the access driveways to be constructed during phase 1 and 2 of the project. A total of four access driveways will be constructed to help distribute internal traffic and create an acceptable level of service for the project as a whole. Phase one will incorporate two access driveways; one along Tangerine Road and the second being the southern most entrance along La Canada Boulevard. A westbound deceleration/right-turn lane into the development along Tangerine Road will be constructed as recommended by the TIA. The southern most driveway along La Canada Boulevard will be a controlled access intersection for right -in and right -out traffic movements only. A Tangerine Corridor Overlay District arterial frontage tract reduction was permitted for this driveway. The location of the driveway and requested tract reduction were approved by the Town Engineer in accordance with Chapter 24.1 of the Town's Zoning Code. Phase two will include a third driveway access located near the middle of the project along La Canada Boulevard. An existing median opening with left -turn pocket for access into the development already exists at this location. This intersection will be a full access intersection with no additional improvements recommended by the TIA. Phase three will incorporate a fourth driveway for access into the northern portion of the development. This northern most driveway along La Canada Boulevard will be a controlled access intersection for right -in and right out traffic movements only. All the above mentioned improvements identified within the Master Development Plan and TIA shall be the responsibility of the developer. All improvements and construction within the public right-of-way shall require a permit issued from the Town Engineer. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENT: This project has been noticed in accordance with Town procedures, which include the following: • Property owner mailing for all directly affected residents within 300' of subject parcel • Homeowners Association mailing • Post property • Post at Town Hall and on website To date, no comments have been received regarding the project. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Page 5 of 5 CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION: Findings in Favor: • The master development plan, phase 1 & 2 development plan, master landscape plan and phase 1 & 2 landscape plan are in conformance with General Plan Policies, OVZCR requirements and Design Guidelines. • The project is in general conformance with the rezoning conditions. • No residents have voiced concerns about the project. Findings Against: • None Staff recommends approval of this application subject to the conditions in Exhibit A. SUGGESTED MOTION: The DRB may wish to consider one of the following suggested motions: I move to recommend [approval, approval with conditions, OR denial] OV1208-07 & 07A, master development plan, phase 1 & 2 development plan, master landscape plan and phase 1 & 2 landscape plan for the Miller Ranch Development subject to the conditions in Exhibit A. Attachments: 1. Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval 2. Master Development Plan, Phase 1 & 2 Development Plan 3. Master Landscape Plan, Phase 1 & 2 Landscape Plan 4. Wash Restoration Plan cc: Tri Miller, tmiller(a)_rickengineering.com Michael Sarabia, msarabiafab_Descogroup.corri Project Manager: David Ronquillo, Senior Planner Paul Popelka, Acting Planning & Zoning Director Craig Civalier, Town Engineer S:\PERMPLUS\DOCS\OV1208-07\PZ_DRBreport5-11-10.doc EXHIBIT A OV1208-07 & 07A MILLER RANCH DEVELOPMENT MAY 11, 2010 Planning 1. Label the pedestrian pathway along the edge of the wash as a "non motorized public recreation easement". It will be required as a dedicated easement. 2. Clarify the maximum building height in general note #5 to conform to the rezoning condition. For buildings 11-13, the maximum building height is 28 feet with the exception of architectural elements which shall not exceed 4 feet above the 28 feet. Only appurtenances necessary for the elevator shaft for buildings 11-13 will be allowed up to 34 feet. The remaining buildings (5- 10) are allowed up to 34 feet as permitted in the T-P zone. 3. Prior to final staff certification of the plan, submit a response letter addressing conformance with all outstanding rezoning conditions. 4. Prior to Town Council approval, the applicant must work with staff to determine an implementation plan for the required wash restoration improvements. Public Works 5. General Comment: Address all redlined comments within the master development plan and drainage report. Provide a comment response letter and return all redlined originals back to the Town of Oro Valley. 6. Sheet 11: Provide additional level landings at the top and bottom of each ramp run proposed between Buildings 12 and 13. For a ramp sloped between 1:16 (6.25%) and 1:20 (5%), the maximum rise shall be 30 inches and the maximum horizontal run shall be 40 feet. Revise as necessary. 7. Sheet 11: A portion of sidewalk located adjacent to the northeast corner of Building 12 appears to have a running slope greater than 1:20 (5%). Any part of an accessible route with a slope greater than 1:20 shall be considered a ramp and shall comply with ADAAG requirements (e.g. handrail, level landings, etc.). Revise as necessary. 8. Drainage Report: State the proper local regulatory flow rate criterion as being 50 cfs. Section 2.2, Existing (On -site) Conditions, indicates 100 cfs as the local regulatory flow rate. 9. Drainage Report: Clarify how the proposed detention basins will function to attenuate the 2, 10, and 25-year peak flows. Peak flow rates and velocities at any point of concentration leaving the site cannot exceed the pre -developed flow rates and velocities for that concentration point for each frequency storm event. Provide additional information as necessary. GENERAL NOTE! 1. GROSS AREA: 913,461 SF ( ) 2. TOTAL AREA TO BE GRADED: 829.875 SF (19.1 AC) 3. TOTAL AREA OPEN SPACE REQUIRED: Cl-45,956 SF TP PHASE 1 - 70,963 SF TP PHASE 2 - 41,532 SF TP PHASE 3 - 18.148 SF TP PHASE 4 - 33,980 SF 4. TOTAL AREA OPEN SPACE PROVIDED: Cl - 51,823 SF --' TP PHASE 1 - 84,040 SF TP PHASE 2 - 45,288 SF TP PHASE 3 - 24,208 SF TP PHASE 4 - 34,752 SF I+iJnj 5. ZONING DESIGNATION: C-1 (COMMERCIAL CENTER) AND TP (TECHNOLOGICAL PARK) = ""' 6. PLAZA SPACE REQUIRED (COMMERCIAL CENTER): 4.596 SF PLAZA SPACE PROVIDED (COMMERCIAL CENTER): 4.990 SF�y � [ PLAZA SPACE REQUIRED (PHASE 1 -TECH PARK): 5,677 SF PLAZA SPACE PROVIDED (PHASE 1 - TECH PARK): 11,284 SF ) r 'u Lo y o 0 PLAZA SPACE REQUIRED (PHASE 2): 3,323 SF It — C PLAZA SPACE PROVIDED (PHASE 2): 8,082 SF c- PLAZA SPACE REQUIRED (PHASE 3): 1.452 SIF PLAZA SPACE PROVIDED (PHASE 3): 1.533 SF PLAZA SPACE REQUIRED (PHASE 4): 2,718 SF ~' PLAZA SPACE PROVIDED (PHASE 4): 3,874 SF { 7. REQUIRED BUILDING SETBACKS: • SOUTH -25' • WEST-25' • NORTH - 25' • EAST-25' S. REFER TO THE BUFFERYARD TABLE ON THIS SHEET FOR BUFFERYARD TYPES AND WIDTHS. 9. PROPERTY OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM AS LONG AS NECESSARY IN ORDER TO TRANSITION PLANTS OVER TO NATURAL SOURCES. ANY PLANT MATERIALS THAT DIE FOR ANY REASON SHALL BE REPLACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 4-213. 10. MATERIALS WITHIN THE SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE SHALL BE PLACED SO AS NOT TO INTERFERE WITH A VISIBILITY PLANE DESCRIBED BY TWO HORIZONTAL LINES LOCATED 30 INCHES AND 72 INCHES ABOVE FINISHED GRADE OF THE ROADWAY SURFACE. PROPERTY OWNER SHALL MAINTAIN BUFFERYARD PLANTINGS TO ENSURE UNOBSTRUCTED VISIBILITY TO MOTORISTS. ALL SHRUBS, ACCENTS, AND GROUNDCOVERS SHALL NOT EXCEED 2' IN HEIGHT WITHIN SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLES. TREES IN SVTS WILL BE MAINTAINED TO ENSURE THAT BRANCHES/FOLIAGE IS NOT BELOW A HEIGHT OF 6. 11. IN THE EVENT OF ABANDONMENT OF THE SITE AFTER GRADINGIDISTURBANCE OF NATURAL AREAS, DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RE -VEGETATED WITH A NON -IRRIGATED HYDROSEED MIX PER TOWN OF ORO VALLEY STANDARDS. 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY WITH OWNER'S PROJECT MANAGER THAT PLANS ARE CURRENT AND APPROVED. 13, WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ORO VALLEY CODE. WHENEVER SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS CONFLICT ON ANY MATTER, THE OWNER'S PROJECT MANAGER SHALL DETERMINE WHICH SPECIAL CONDITION OR CODE SHALL GOVERN. 14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH THE ENGINEERING SOILS REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS AS THEY RELATE TO HIS WORK. 15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY AND/OR REQUIRED PERMITS AND PAY ALL RELATED FEES AND/OR TAXES REQUIRED TO INSTALL THE WORK ON THE PLANS. 16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE APPROPRIATELY LICENSED AS REQUIRED BY THE STATE OF ARIZONA. 17. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER'S PROJECT MANAGER IMMEDIATELY OF ANY ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPANCIES IN EXISTING CONDITIONS OR WITH THE PLANS PRIOR TO BEGINNING THE WORK. 18. UNIT PRICES FOR ALL IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE ESTABLISHED AS A PART OF THE CONTRACT WITH THE OWNER'S PROJECT MANAGER PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK, TO ACCOMMODATE ADDITIONS AND/OR DELETIONS OF MATERIAL AND/OR LABOR. 19. DETERMINATION OF "EQUAL' SUBSTITUTIONS SHALL BE MADE ONLY BY THE OWNER'S PROJECT MANAGER. 20. SITE OBSERVATION BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DURING ANY PHASE OF THIS PROJECT DOES NOT RELIEVE THE CONTRACTOR OF HIS/HER PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITY TO PERFORM ALL WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS. SPECIFICATIONS AND GOVERNING CODES. 21. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FULL MAINTENANCE OF ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS AFTER INITIAL WRITTEN APPROVAL, 22. EXISTING UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES REPORTED BY OWNERS OR OTHERS AND THOSE SHOWN ON RECORDS EXAMINED, ARE INDICATED ON THE PLAN WITH THEIR APPROXIMATE LOCATION AND EXTENT. UNDERGROUND FACILITIES MAY EXIST WHICH HAVE NOT BEEN REPORTED OR OF RECORD. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO TAKE DUE PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES TO PROTECT THOSE FACILITIES FOUND AT THE SITE. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO NOTIFY THE OWNER(S) OF THESE FACILITIES BEFORE STARTING WORK CAUTION: BEFORE EXCAVATING, VERIFY THE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. AT LEAST TWO (2) WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REQUEST MARK OUT OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES BY CALLING BLUE STAKE AT 1-800-782-5348. 23. CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. THIS INCLUDES THE SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY. THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND SHALL NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS. THE CONTRACTOR ALSO AGREES TO DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND HIS REPRESENTATIVES HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL AND/OR ALLEGED IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK ON THIS PROJECT. 24. SUBSEQUENT LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR REMAINING PHASES MUST BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD. MASTER LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR: MILLEIR, UNSUn^D1 ASSN3 2J9 DKT 10856, sp UNS 18D J ASSN3 219- DKT 10742; ala UNSUnDI! ASSN3 219- DKT 1J00�J; orq JY UNSUBDIV DKT J1693, . RI-144 UNSUDDIVI ASSN3 219-4 DKT 3352, F RI-I44 UNSU8DJVJ ASSN3 2J9-3' DKT JIa10, F RI-1144 KEY MAP 1"=2W LANDSCAPE BURRERvAon "rAOR IM LEGEND PROPERTY LINE 10 YEAR FLOOD LIMITS 100 YEAR FLOOD LIMITS f -.1 WASH RESTORATION AREA RIPARIAN APRON � v I BUFFER BUFFER TYPE BUFFER WIDTH I BUFFER 1 LENGTH I TREES �REO'D. TREES PROVIDED SHRUBS REO'D. SHRUBS :'ACCENTS! ACCENTS COMMENTS i PROVIDED j REO'D. PROVIDED NORTH B SOUTH B I 30' 30' 340 425' 7 22 18 22 17 22 28 34 48 25 44 48 EAST B 30' 2430' 122 I 135 122 j 142 1 243 262 WESTt-- - — BUFFER PROVIDED BY WASH SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIAUf--1 Fc DESIGN SPEED (MPH) NEAR SIDE 1 FAR SIDE SIDE SIDE 15 PAAL'S (MAJOR) 10' X 100' 10' X 70' 15 PAAL'S (MINOR) 10' X 30' I 10' X 30' 40 45 I 480' 370' 600' ! 470' Q SCALE: 3"=1 MILE THIS PROJECT a LOCATION MAP A PORTION OF SECTION 34, T 11 S, R 13 E G 8 SRM TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY. ARIZONA PROJECT DIRECTORY: OWNER/DEVELOPER DESCO - MILLER. LLC. AN ARIZONA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 1795 E. SKYLINE DRIVE #193 TUCSON, ARIZONA 95718 (520)297-8929 ATTN: MICHAEL SARABIA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RICK ENGINEERING CO. 3945 E. FORT LOWELL ROAD, SUITE 111 TUCSON, AZ 85712 CONTACT PERSON: MARK FELLINGER PHONE: 520-795-1D00 FAX 520322-6956 E-MAIL: mfellinger@ridcengineering.com CIVIL ENGINEER RICK ENGINEERING CO. 3945 E. FORT LOWELL ROAD, SUITE 111 TUCSON, AZ 85712 CONTACT PERSON: PAUL IEZZI PHONE: 520-795-1000 FAX: 520-322-6956 E-MAIL: pieai@rickengineering.com SHEET INDEX SHT. # SHEET DESCRIPTION LT-01 1 COVER SHEET LP-01 2 PLANTING LEGEND LP-02 3 PLANTING PLAN LP-03 4 PLANTING PLAN LP-04 5 PLANTING PLAN LP-05 6 PLANTING PLAN LP-06 7 PLANTING PLAN LP-07 8 PLANTING PLAN LI-01 9 IRRIGATION LEGEND AND NOTES LI-02 10 IRRIGATION PLAN LI-03 11 IRRIGATION PLAN LI-04 12 I IRRGATION PLAN LI-05 13 IRRGATION PLAN LI-06 14 IRRIGATION PLAN LI-07 15 IRRIGATION PLAN LD-01 16 LANDSCAPE DETAILS APPROVAL PLANNING AND ZONING DATE ADMINISTRATOR OV12-08-07 3673e • % NARK E. rELLINnER . •. Z 22• 9q�70NA U41" -p. 9-30-t0� Ll < wQO wwN �M< <w Cl °aazz K� a~)¢O R k a: w >?� am Oua ZN rn7Q 2 O 3a x x_a LL W W m O Z 2 U O O w O (r F Z V n 1� iL z b < 0 < Z W 5 w m0- O LT-01 SCALE : 1' = 200' SHEET 1 OF 16 s PLANT MATS. LEGEND SYMBOL BOTANI OTY. SIZE H x W (CALIPER) REMARKS SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME OTY. SIZE REMARA— COMMONNAME COMMON NAME TREES ACCENTS k AGAVE I 42 5 GAL j j ACACIA SALIGNA 25 15 GAL 6' x 7 (.75') EUINA S AGAVE OCTOPUS AGAVE Z J WILLOW ACACIA o N f ® AGAVE BRACTEOSA 69 5 GAL. IN POT, SEE FIN. SCHED. .0 ACACIA WILLARDLEJJA 20 15 GAL. 6 x 2'( .75') QUID AGAVE S PALO BLANCO / CHILOPSIS LINEARIS 39 ISGAL- V x 2' (.75') e CALYLOPHUS HARTWEGII 177 1 GAL DESERT WILLOW CALYLOPHUS CERGDIUM X DESERT MUSEUM 111 DESERT MUSEUM PALO VERDE 24' BOX 7.5 x 4' (1.5" + CARNEGIA GIGANTEA 7 - TRANSPLANT SAGUARO n �^ \= CERCIDIUM FLORIDUM 3 + 1 - - TRANSPLANT DALEA GREGGII 16 5 GAL. 12 BLUE PALO VERDE TRAILING INDIGO BUSH o m CERGDIUM MICROPHYLLUM 83 FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE 2 15 GAL 36' BOX 4' x 2 (.5') 8' x 6(2') DASYIURION WHEELERI 220 5 GAL DESERT SPOON d' Z 2 48' BOX 10' x 8' (3.5') Pc9 `� bsca y ■ FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII 36 5 GAL OBARREL CACTUS PROSOPIS VELUTINA 75 24' BOX 7' x 4' (1') VELVET MESQUITE ■ FEROCACTUS WISUZENII 12 TRANSPLANT BARREL CACTUS a Euu A it HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA 179 5 GAL av RED YUCCA •e`o. SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME QTY. SIZE REMARKS 1' COMMON NAME O LANTANA MONTEVIDENSIS 446 1 GAL- o-ao-to 0 0 TRAILING LANTANA SHRUBS © LANTANA'GOLD MOUND' 94 1 GAL. E GOLD MOUND LANTANA w w O ACACIA CONSTRICTA 17 5 GAL. MUHLENBERGIA'AUTUMNGLOW 63 5 GAL L o � < o � a � WHITETHORN w w ACACIA AUTUMN GLOW DEER GRASS y Q CAESALPINIA PULCHERRIMA 23 5 GAL ® PENSTEMON PARRYI 110 1 GAL > m RED BIRD OF PARADISE PARRY'S PENSTEMON o 4 CALLIANDRA ERIOPHYL LA 197 5 GAL FAIRY DUSTER o SALVIA GREGGI 286 5 GAL o a AUTUMN SAGE UCL O DODONAEA VISCOSA 60 5 GAL • VERBENA GOODINGII 376 1 GAL a ?I HOPSEED BUSH GOODING VERBENA o o O ENCELIA FARINOSA 83 5 GAL - BRITTLE BUSH NON -IRRIGATED HYDROSEED MIX A R N I w Q LEUCOPHYLLUM GREEN CLOUD 235 5 GAL PLS o c �, .!y,; TEXAS RANGER SPECIES LBS/ACRE r;,,/yC Q 1f0 SGALLEUCOPHYLLUMLAEVIGATUM .RATEGREENCLOUD ..-;'fi• .;� ACCIACONSTRi0.WHITTHORACCIA 2.0 r s wW w is CHIHUAHUAN RAIN SAGE AMBROSIA DELTIODEA. TRIANGLE LEAF BURSAGE 4.0 ARISTIDA PURPUREA, PURPLE THREE -AWN 2.0 o SIMMONDSIA CHINENSIS 73 5 GAL BAILEYA MULTIRADIATA, DESERT MARIGOLD 2.0 z i o JOJ08A BUTELOUA CURTIPENDUTA, SIDE -OATS GRAMA 2.0 i CASSIACOVESII,DESERT SENNA 2.0 W 1 o 0 ENCELIA FARINOSA, BRITTLEBUSH 1.5 ERICAMERIA LARICIFOLL4, TURPENTINE BUSH 1.0 LARREA DIVARICATA, CREOSOTE 6.0 LL Q PENSTEMON PARRYI, DESERT PENSTEMON 2.0 0 H O PLANTAGO INSULARIS, INDIAN WHEAT 3.0 w t� N u V SPHAERALCEAAMBIGUA, DESERT GLOBE -MALLOW 1.0 SPOROBOLUS CRYPTANDRUS, SAND DROPSEED 1.0 o NOTE: PLANT QUANTITIES FOR 29.5 TOTAL LL PHASES 2,3 AND 4 WILL BE ADJUSTED Q 0NOTES: j BASED ON NATIVE PLANT INVENTORY MIX FOR NATIVE SEED APPLICATION SHALL CONSIST OFTHE FOLLOWING: (� Q.SLURRY m E� FOR THOSE PHASES AT TIME OF SEED =LBS/ACRE PER SEED MIX 0IL 0. DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL z � w a o i MYCORSOIL MYCORRHIZAE (TRI C ENDO 120) =60 LBS/ACRE HIZAENER C ENDO 120) -60 LB /AGREE g w WOOD FIBER -2500 LBS/ACRE CL I y w wQ,'` 0 2 m AREA TO BE SEEDED SHALL BE THOROUGHLY TILLED PRIOR TO APPLICATION OF SLURRY 00 MIX TILLING OPERATIONS SHALL BE PERFORMED SO AS NOT TO DISTURB ADJACENT (o F' CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS AND FINISH SCHEDULE: AREAS OF NATIVE VEGETATION. ` Oa Z J !�� COLORED CONCRETE: THIS SEED MIX WILL NOT BE IRRIGATED. APPLICATION OF SEED MIX SHALL COINCIDE "'0 N 0 — ,a SHALL BE INTEGRALLY COLORED. COLOR TO BE DETERMINED WITH PERIODS OF SEASONAL RAIN (JULY-AUGUST OR NOVEMBER-DECEMBER) IN ORDER Z w g TO ENCOURAGE GERMINATION. m POTS: 0 SHALL BE'QUICKCRETE MODEL ORCE2422P'. COLOR AND FINISH TO BE DETERMINED. LOCATE PER PLANS (IS TOTAL). SITE STABILIZATION ALL AREAS OF THE SITE GRADED OR DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION, EXCEPT BASIN BOTTOMS, THAT ARE NOT STABILIZED WITH DECOMPOSED GRANITEIDECORATIVE ROCK SHALL BE HYDROSEEDED. I INORGANIC GROUNDCOVER i A MIN. 2' DEPTH LAYER OF DECOMPOSED GRANITE/DECORATTVE ROCK SHALL BE PLACED IN ALL PLANTING AREAS. SIZE SHALL BE 1' SCREENED ON SLOPES GREATER THAN 4:1 AND S/8' P-� SCREENED IN ALL OTHER AREAS. COLOR SHALL BE DESERT GOLD' AVAILABLE THROUGH KALAMAZOO MATERIALS (520.575-%01). SCALE : wA OV12-08-07 SHEET 2 OF 16 OV9-04-02 (MATCHLINE - SHEET LP-04/ ��_ a .�..• .. I --c - - -- --' -- a: I R16 v' ® 'if I k4?7t:.i "•:: } .�•r...:1._..tt':i: :... zZ ETAJNINGWALL PER GRADING PLAN SCALE: 1•=30 R BARRICADE RAILING PER CML PLAN 1 �100-YEAR • a' C'. .. I A ' 1 FLOOD Z ... .. .... - .... — Ir' T-N 1S RIPARUW - G O CO .� W I APRON J T WASH RESTORATION AREA. SEE SEPARATE / QT T }........ 'E:.:: •' :. z WASH RESTDFUTTGN FUN tiO : e- BUILDING 5 ® PLAZA AREA • I \/ � 2 ! f ::w:: il' w0 . 0: :.f: o ..� .. i. Pc. c.'t •ty (2.3031 16114 % O iA a..: COLORED CONCRETE �^ 0 • p WRK E. 2 ..p :•: •::: PAVING. TYPICAL i 6' P IYATE T 0 WAY E SEMENT i ' 2p COLOR I O BE GAS DETERMINED_ `EI�_ R©I 0.SCAPE tv 22, TU�SO r�'. � Die j 7 ] FOR ELE IC ANSMELECTRISSIO - • A TRI B N BY DOC T 4 4 PAGE 9 ' PR E IGHT WAY SEM _ BENCH, ( • \ \ I T TUCS G 5 AlD EL CTRIC r- 7. TYPICAL • .':"' _ i J OR EL RI C INFR TR E.! i IBY DO T 4 26 PA 623 - ( AREA °'Moor flN, w .0 s 2.548 TRASH e F(ECEPTACI.E. TYPICAL e O O l_ J • .. I ® .. a ..:• :i.d:.: •:: i. a w w OU CLAI DE RE AWING EA MEN O ESMT d ELL 6 •. a a d rm m t AND TE E E T (WATERL LE f e § j L TION UNKN N AND WELL I / l'/ �' - 6 w o z o I Q w SMT ES OEFIN , T , • :e' ® : ��— x O� ! ��// PAG 216L e e La a = 'f CORR N OUl CLAIM /'� / O 0:.. O�Y,+cO O -�O' J'O ._�� O (S ESMTSI CKET OK7 .e �1 AGE 21 ND COfiRECTI�N'� /j ! .D..a. .r 'A. A MIS) DOCKEj 10754 .�I op 4 .T' T I ® I m I.'. O. I g� 'O a PA zoo4 J -) //r J / * o: O' ® I p 7 fi' N i i ;t o� Ir r ©® o W W .0 • N U _ ,tcis MATCHLINE -SHEET _2 ,, 11 : Li 6 i�' 6 ^ a : oQ� z i �r�rr r' PII&LSl£; co E; ! I S�0'� z 30' SYT it 1 "� A w K COMMERCIAL c � LLFZ C O 7) W�� LL I-4 O O Z =U Q oa u1� mZ �z xao =a Wm i w ZO3z� o 0 N 0 H Oz� 1 Z J k� aoy z Lu wm— m � a W n w LP-03 W OV12-08-07 SCALE O OV9-04-02 SHEET 4 OF 16 G:%36(58_CorpLLands pe%ConstDoes_ov a1113668_LP.Cwg Plotted: Feb.22, 2010 PHASE 2 - MATCHLINE - SHEET LP-05 , V � � O W � waC2 Zm W a WKy�j~ 4 W O N 1 WZ W W 1 - ' u 1a PwvaTE WASH RESTORATION -� \R.O.W. EASEMENT AREA. SEE SEPARATE I DKIT 4226 PG 623 WASH RESTORATION PLAN I� 10-YEAR I, i FLooD u�� 100-YEAR V FLOOD LIMIT I M IV RIPARUW / APRON MATCHLINE/SHEET LP-03 ® • O ro. / �YF �, IIkMi�MJIIIiS! ri �• ' i�lyk :i ti,04' ly (�► �i� dim►. � �_ • .�;� _� 0 D a aSCALE: V-30' a 5 , P 4Vat E. rELL*JZ2• 1 `• I .m s-7o tl 0 o N i{V LL � 00 yy P^ W V Os^ ui �n Ia C, o w Li z c z m w a4 0 0 LL � N it o U.O F 1 O Z j U Q ONa NO (A � W aw�� v� � ZOOC: o �`7 It a ~ . Qom b pus u m I LP-04 OV12-08-07 SCALE37 OV9-04-02 SHEET 5 OF 16 ■■1■EM■E m % .FM NGER y. � k / %< §g } / k§ k (§!§ f k dk! } \ kk } � // &20 Ix § [ �m §�# /�k 0w ggr a�� 0w . \ 0.z/ . k/\ a ' LP-05 OV12-08 07 1 sue: "_ o -a-e F s c. « 16 � � SCALE: ._ LP-06 | ) OV12-0�7SCALE : -- ~- o -a-E SHEET OF 16 ■t1tM■ME 2 � %/ MAN E. rELLI z� . #.. _ wu t NC0 \ 7 §§§§ §o 2 § ;2k} `A § 13 ; ¥# : , | 9 . \) }i � 0 (�� )tom §§k )� Z2 k1/3 _ > \ 9LZ . <0< , } Lu . LP-07 V12-08 0 SCALE : ~- o -m-E SHEET 8 OF 16 IRRIGATION NOTES WATER SOURCE 1. THE IRRIGATION POINTS OF CONNECTION SHALL. BE AFTER NEW V WATERS METER SEE WATER PLANS. 2 THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS DESIGNED TO OPERATE AT 50 PSI AT THE POINT OF CONNECTION. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS DESIGNED TO OPERATE WITH ONLY ONE VALVE OPEN ATATIME. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE WATER PRESSURE IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO PURCHASE OF ANY EQUIPMENT AND PERFORMING ANY INSTALLATIONS, IF THE PRESSURE IS NOT AS STATED ABOVE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE PROCEEDING. PROCUREMENT AND/OR INSTALLATION OF ANY IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT WITHOUT VERIFICATION OF SATISFACTORY WATER PRESSURE SHALL BE AT THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR 4. ALL WATER USE FOR LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION AND ENHANCEMENT SHALL CONFORM TO THE ARIZONA GROUNDWATER CODE, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES TITLE 45. CHAPTER 2 GENERAL 1. DRAWINGS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC. THE SCALE OF THE PLANS SOMETIMES MAKES IT NECESSARY TO SHOW IRRIGATION PIPELINES WITHIN BUILDINGS, WALKS OR OTHERWISE OUTSIDE OF PLANTING AREAS. THIS IS ONLY FOR CLARITY OF THE PLANS. ALL IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT SHALL BE INSTALLED IN PLANTER AREAS WHEREVER POSSIBLE 2 UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ON THE PLANS: ALL LATERAL END RUNS ARE TO BE. 3/4", MAINLINE IS TO BE TO BE 1' UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ON PLAN; ALL PIPE SHALL. BE DOWNSIZED IN DIRECTION OF FLOW ONLY. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT INSTALL THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS WHEN IT IS OBVIOUS THAT FIELD CONDITIONS SUCH AS OBSTRUCTIONS, GRADING DIFFERENCES OR DIFFERENCES IN SIZE AND SHAPE OF THE PUNTED AREAS MAY NOT HAVE BEEN ACCOMMODATED IN THE ORIGINAL DESIGN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF SUCH CHANGE IN FIELD CONDITIONS. IF NOTIFICATION IS NOT PERFORMED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSTALLATION AND FOR THE NEED OF ANY SUBSEQUENT REVISIONS. 4. ALL PIPE LINES AND CONTROL WIRES CROSSING UNDER PAVING SHALL BE SLEEVED. SLEEVES SHALL BE PVC SCH 40 PIPE WITH BELLED ENDS AND SHALL BE TWO TIMES THE DIAMETER OF THE SLEEVED PIPE OR WIRE BUNDLE (2- MINIMUM). CONTROL WIRE TO BE SLEEVED SEPARATELY FROM PIPE 5. IN CASE OF POSSIBLE CONTROL WIRE FAILURE OR FUTURE EXPANSION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A MINIMUM OF TWO SPARE CONTROL WIRES FROM THE CONTROLLER TO THE FARTHEST VALVE IN EACH CONTROLLER SERVICE AREA ADDITIONALLY SPARE WIRE FROM ALL EMPTY STATIONS SHALL BE INSTALLED SIMILARLY. ALL SPARE WIRES SHALL PASS THROUGH ALL VALVE BOXES ALONG THE MAINLINE ROUTE. THESE WIRES SHALL BE A DIFFERENT COLOR FROM OTHER CONTROL WIRES AND BE LABELED AS SPARE AT THE CONTROLLER CABINET, IN THE VALVE BOX OF THE FARTHEST VALVE, AND AT ALL OTHER VALVE BOXES. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITHIN WORK AREA PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REQUEST MARKOUT OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES BY CALLING BLUESTAKE AT 1.800.782-SM. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO REFER TO ALL OTHER IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR THIS PROJECT FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. CONTROLS 1. SYSTEMS OF THIS PROJECT ARE CONTROLLED BY SOLID STATE, COMPUTER IRRIGATION CONTROLLERS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURERS' INSTRUCTIONS FOR INSTALLATION AND GROUNDING. 2. CONTROLLER LOCATION IS SHOWN DIAGRAMMATICALLY. FINAL LOCATION TO BE APPROVED BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE POWER SHALL BE PROVIDED BY OTHERS (SEE ELECTRICAL AND/OR ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS). THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONNECTION OF POWER TO THE CONTROLLER IN COMPLIANCE TO ALL GOVERNING CODES. EMITTERS 1. INSTALL 3/4' EMITTER TUBING WITH DRIP EMITTERS AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE IRRIGATION TO ALL NEW SHRUBS AND TREES (EXCEPT CACTUS) AS SHOWN ON PLANTING PLAN. 2. LAYOUT EMITTER TUBING PARALLEL TO TOPOGRAPHY WHEREVER POSSIBLE. INSTALL AUTOMATIC FLUSH TYPE END CAP AT ENDS OF ALL 3/4' LINES AND FLUSH THOROUGHLY BEFORE INSTALLING EMITTERS. 3. INSTALL ONE SINGLE OUTLET EMITTER AT EACH SHRUB. MULTI -OUTLET EMITTERS MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR INDIVIDUAL EMITTERS. 4. INSTALL ONE MULTI -OUTLET EMITTER (6 PORT) AT EACH TREE. LOCATE TWO (2) OF THE OUTLET POINTS AT IT FROM THE TREE TRUNK AND LOCATE FOUR (4) OUTLET POINTS AT 30' FROM THE TREE TRUNK. SPACE OUTLET POINTS EVENLY AROUND THE TREE. S. USE SHORT PIECES OF 1/4' DISTRIBUTION TUBING (MAXIMUM LENGTH S-) TO EXTEND EMITTERS TO EACH ROOTBALL_ HOLD IN PLACE WITH STAKES. FINAL EQUIPMENT LOCATION 1. MAJOR IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT IN PLANTER BEDS SHALL BE HIDDEN FROM CASUAL VIEW. 2 THE FINAL LOCATION OF ALL. VALVES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. SEE PLANS FOR PARTICULAR INFORMATION ON VALVE PLACEMENT. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE LOCATIONS FOR REVIEW AND ADJUSTMENT BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. NECESSARY RELOCATION OF IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT ASA RESULT OF THE CONTRACTORS FAILURE TO STAKE LOCATION AND RECEIVE APPROVAL SHALL BE AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT LEGEND SYMBOL DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER/MODEL REMARKS ® NEW 1' WATER METER SEE WATER PLAN 65A AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER HUNTER ICC-1600SS WITH PEDSS AND PWB �e AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER HUNTER ICC-1200SS WITH PEDSS AND PWB BP BACKFLOW PREVENTION ASSEMBLY 1' FEBCO 825Y ® REMOTE CONTROL VALVE ASSEMBLY (1) RAINBIRD 1- PEB SERIES VALVE (1) RAINSIRD RBYl00MPTX FILTER OR EQUAL (1) BALL VALVE, NIBCO OR EQUAL ► IN -LINE PRESSURE REGULATOR RAINBIRD PS14-WX-075, OR EQ. ►1 BALL VALVE NIBCO, OR EQUAL LINE SIZE 1-1/4' PVC MAINLINE PIPE AS APPROVED PVC SCH 40 1' PVC LATERAL. LINE PIPE AS APPROVED PVC CLASS 200 PVC SLEEVE AS APPROVED PVC SCH 40; TWO TIMES DIA OF PIPE OR WIRE BUNDLE. (4' MIN.) 3/4' POLYETHYLENE LATERAL AS APPROVED EXTEND FROM PRESSURE REGULATORS TO WITHIN V OF EACH TREE AND SHRUB. NOT SHOWN SINGLE OUTLET EMITTER RAINBIRD XB-10, OR EQUAL NOT SHOWN MULTI -OUTLET EMITTER RAINBIRD XB-10-6, OR EQUAL --A AUTOMATIC FLUSH CAP API MODEL FCH, OR EQUAL INSTALL IN 6' ROUND VALVE BOX VALVE KEY s f STATION NUMBER A-• sVE I-.1- SIZE GPM FLOW (GPM) ~� PLANTING TYPE p N p N o W U. m m 9 O 3 o (0.� NN^pN as T � � W W U � O u m w 0 U. 0 L) o� a F� w o o a : IL m 0m h�O N ;Qz w cl L,g- �='Q O�It IIIk� FOw ` OOg gz k� azt b Q0< �wg m m w0 LI-01 OV12-08-07 OV9-04-02 SCALE : NIA SHEET 9 OF 16 _MArx NE .sEET U4)4 ® —. FAATCHU■E s ESL M2 { § | � E. ZR _9-30} !! �w g i / | I i } (/ . k \ . U, ),)§ : 2 ]ƒ( ! /e�] (� k(I V V) § )§ � i Z\� 2 LL : ro- \ (L « . ��\ ��o , LI-03 OV12-0807 sue: w_ o -«-o _ET, OF 16 MATCHLINE -SHEET LI-07 4 MATCHLINE -SHEET LI-05 i c 0 q3 f7 `I I� 9 I * 1 EXTEND MAINLINE TO THIS LOCATION AND CAP FOR FUTURE PHASE 3 EXTENSION. RUN CONTROLLER WIRE TO THIS _y_ ��- _-------___—i i. i I 1 LOCATION FOR 6 ADDITIONAL VALVES SCALE: V W w L'-'-` _ — --- FOR FUTURE PHASES. PROVIDE VALVE T I I I BOX FOR ACCESS TO WIRE ENDS. 11 6 I jl I III li i% lil y I i I�1 II 1 i' ® I �RI IT ° BUILDING=="' fllf I I I B•4 Q walc E. 1; II 7• ci-fELLR1GER . 1 Q' �4 ?•Z I I` 1 SHRUB v b c ��7olu �I .,. 9_JO_ Q I.II. I b7 1 C4 fV °I 1 16 I t $ F• H I �' 1 jl .'. �----J j 11 � • 6 p p W w o --..--_..—�— H -lOa" N fV _._�_ I �- ---�-- _- • nNE 1111 W W � II II II � I W �------------ --- w 4a O m 0 w�a 6 o 'z LL a z� o U I W = < j a. w 09) a� h�Q � w--- � xap gga�'�y oy t3 �` 0 w �I az� c��11 <ON �1 M 10 Lu Mu In al I LI-06 OV12-08-07 SCALE: ''- j OV9-04-02 SHEETI4 OF 16 ! ) MEE■■ME� � . 67 % :.�: . } C / k k) ] §� � § z IWO! kk ) /$ 8K , x 2§§ u§¥ . Z $2{ k (� /§} �g 2�Z u=! CL a!2 0k� \� E�& ILz �4 <0 kW§ . -li I i OV12-0"7 o -a-e I s Ea OF e ; Oj ENCLOSURE AND AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER PER IRRIGATION LEGEND OZ 3/4' POWER CONDUIT; SIZE, TYPE, DEPTH PER LOCAL CODE O3 GROUND WIRE CONDUIT, MIN. 1-1/2". GROUND PER ASIC GUIDELINES O 6' THICK FORMED AND POURED -IN -PLACE CONCRETE BASE O5 FINISH GRADE © CONDUIT FOR GCBL WIRING O CONDUIT FOR DECODER WIRES NOTES: 1. SEE INSTRUCTION MANUAL FOR MOUNTING INSTRUCTIONS. 2. ALL WIRING SHALL BE INSTALLED PER LOCAL CODES. 3. 120 VOLT POWER TO BE SUPPLIED BY OWNER � _ IRRIGATION CONTROLLER �`''� NOTTO -SCALE Q- P-t�' �5 O IDENTIFICATION GUIDE DW RW A COMM COMMUNICATION SPLICES DWRW A GR GROUNDING RODS DW RW A STA # REMOTE CONTROL VALVES DWRW A MV MASTER VALVES DWRW A FS FLOW SENSORS DWRW A GV GATE VALVES DW RW A FI FERTILIZER INJECTORS DWRW A BS BASKETSTRAINERS DWRW A MS MOISTURE SENSORS DWRW A SB SPLICE BOX DWRW AOC QUICK COUPLERS DWRW A FS FLOW SENSORS DWRW A FVA FLUSH VALVE ASSEMBLY CONTACT IRRIGATION CONSULTANT FOR INFO ON ANY DEVICE IN A BOX NOT LISTED. O WYE STRAINER (LINE SIZE), SEE LEGEN® BRASS NIPPLE, TYPICAL © 1 CU. FT. CONCRETE THRUST O2 REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW BLOCKS. TYPICAL WRAP DEVICE WITH 2 BALL VALVES, REFER PIPES W/ 10 MIL TAPE. TO PLAN FOR TYPE AND SIZE OF SATURATE AND COMPACT EQUIPMENT SUB -GRADE TO 90% PRIOR TO 0 BRASS UNION POUR ® BRASS ELL (TYPICAL) 7O FINISH GRADE 8O PVC MALE ADAPTER Ls BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE NOT TO SCALE 4 1r 1 1 2 2 3 12" 12" 12" O7 JUMBO RECTANGULAR VAVLE BOX 20' X 14' O2 STANDARD RECTANGULAR VAVLE BOX 16' X 11' 3 ROUND VALVE BOX 10' DIA 4 EDGE OF AREA (CURB, WALK OR WALL) SAMPLE POTABLE WATER SYSTEM OF CONTROLLER'A' REMOTE CONTROL VALVE ON STATION 12 NOTES: 1. VALVE BOXES SHALL BE LABELED BY HOT IRON BRANDING OR ALLUMINIUM ASPHALTIC BASE WATER -PROOF PAINT. 2. CONTROL VALVES SHALL BE INSTALLED TO ALLOW ORDERLYARRANGEMENT OF VALVE BOXES. 3. LOCATE VALVE ASSEMBLIES IN SHRUB OR GROUND COVER AREAS WHEN POSSIBLE. 4. LOCATION OF VALVE ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE STAKED FOR APPROVAL BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. S. CENTER VALVE BOXES OVER VALVE ASSEMBLE TO FAGUE TATE ACCESS AND MAINTENANCE. 6. SET VALVE BOXES AT EQUAL ELEVATIONS WITH TOPS AT FINISH GRADE IN TURF AREAS OR r ABOVE FINISH GRADE IN SHRUB/ GROUND COVER AREAS. 7. VALVE BOXES SHALL BE SET PARALLEL TO EACH OTHER AND PERPENDICULAR TO EDGE OF AREA 8. DO NOT DEFOREM OR COLLAPSE VALVE BOX BY EXESSWE SOIL COMPACTION AROUND BOX 9. SEE ALSO INDIVIDUAL VALVE INSTALLATION DETAILS. %1 VALVE PLACEMENT r NOT TO SCALE 1 ROOTBALL 2 CROWN 1' ABOVE FINISH GRADE 3 FINISH GRADE 4 FINISHGRADEATSLOPE 6 2 X ROOTBALL DIAMETER 6 BACRZ (SEE SPECS) 7 PLANT TABLETS (SEE SPECS) g SEE SPECIFICATIONS 9 TOP OF PAVING 10 4- WATERING BASIN (IF REQD) 11 UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL �v1 SHRUB PLANTING n NOT TO SCALE O FINISH GRADE O2 CLEAN COMPACTED BACKFILL O3 LATERAL LINES. SEE SPECS Q UNDISTURBED SOIL O5 CONTROL WIRES, SEE SPECS. ©PRESSURE MAINUNE. SEE SPECIFICATIONS DIMENSION A B C 1fr TO 2-t2'SIZE Ir 1r 4' 3' W SIZE 24' 4' 4'ANOLARGER 36' P 0 PVC SCH. 80 NIPPLE (CLOSE) 2O VALVE BOX W/COVER. 24'SIZE 3 ID TAG 4 WATER PROOF CONNECTION (1 OF 2) 6O 304NCH LINEAR LENGTH OF WIRE. COILED © FINISH GRADE O TOP OF MULCH ® PVC SCH. 40 COUPLING Q PVC SCH. 80 NIPPLE (LENGTH AS READ) 1 o PVC SCH. 40 ELL 11 PVC SCH. 80 NIPPLE (r LENGTH, HIDDEN) AND PVC SCH. 40 ELL 12 PVC SCH. 40 TEE OR ELL 13 BRICK (1OF: 4) 14 r MIN. DEPTH OF 3/4' WASHED GRAVEL 15 PVC MAINUNE, SIZE PER PLANS 18 DRIP VALVE ASSEMBLY PER LEGEND 17 PVC SCH. 80 UNION FOR SERVICING ASSEMBLY 20 PVC SCH. 40 MALE ADAPTER REMOTE CONTROL VALVE (DRIP) V NOT TO SCALE r�.1 TRENCHING V NOT TO SCALE O ROOTBALL 0 O @ AMENDED BACKFILL MIX O 0 o O3 WATER BASIN O >J O MULCH O FINISH GRADE © WIDTH TWICE DIAMETER OF ROOTBALL O O PLACE ROOTBALL ON O NATURAL GRADE FERTILIZER TABLETS __ O9 (2) r DIA X 19 LONG, LODGE POLES. PLACE 3 -- -l:l OUTSIDE ROOTBALL BLACK PLASTIC CINCH -TIE WITH ONE TWIST NAILED TO STAKES _� 11 HARDPAN OR CAUCHE 11 SOIL LAYER @ DRILL 8- DIAMETER o- 7 CHIMNEY DRAINAGE HOLE OTO THE SIDE OF 6 ROOTBALL IF HARDPAN I' 1 OR CALICHE SOIL LAYER ` TREE PLANTING IS ENCOUNTERED. NOT TO SCALE 1O 6' ROUND VALVE BOX 0 BALL VALVE PER LEGEND 3 LATERAL LINE 4 3' MIN. DEPTH OF 3/4' WASHED GRAVEL Q FINISH GRADE OF DG. 1O 6- ROUND VALVE BOX 2O PRESSURE REGULATOR PER LEGEND 3 LATERAL LINE 4 3' MIN. DEPTH OF 3/4' WASHED GRAVEL O FINISH GRADE OF DG. BALL VALVE @ PRESSURE REGULATOR NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE 1O PAVING O SAND BACKFILL COMPACTED TO THE DENSITY OF EXISTING SOIL O LATERAL LINE SEE LEGEND FOR SPECS Q CONTROL WIRE SEE LEGEND FOR SPECS O UNDISTURBED SOIL © MAINLINE SLEEVE. SEE LEGEND FOR SPECS DIMENSION- PEDESTRIAN A B C D rT01rSIZE 30' 24' tr 4' DIMENSION -VEHICLE A B C D Z'TO12'SL2E 36' 3P 24' 4' NOTES: 1. ALL SLEEVES TO BE PVC SCH. 40 PPE 2. ALL SLEEVES TO BE SIZED TWICE THE DIA. OF THE WORKING PIPE. 3. ALL SLEEVES TO RUN A MIN. OF 12* BEYOND HARDSCAPE EDGES. 4. WRAP #12 GALVANIZED WIRE AROUND EACH END OF SLEEVE (10 WRAPS MIN.) AND EXTEND TO SURFACE AS A LOCATING DEVICE I�u1 SLEEVING n NOT TO SCALE 1O QUICK COUPLER VALVE. 2O BRASS RISER LAR (SIZE EQUAL TO OCV INLET). O SWING JOINT (2 SCH 80 ST ELLS;1 SCH BO T X T ELL:1 SCH 80 NIPPLE} 4O PVC TEE (SST) OR EL (ST) ON PRESS MAIN. O PVC PRESSURE MAIN. © PEA GRAVEL SUMP WITHIN BOX 7O 12'x36' SCH 40 GALV STEEL PIPE STAKE AND 2 STAINLESS STEEL TIES. 8 FLUSH IN TURF: r #N IN SHRUB AREA 9 VALVE BOX 10 BRICK OR CONCRETE SUPPORTS (IYP). (9 UNDISTURBED/COMPACTED SUBGRADE. 1© CONCRETE FOOTING (127A2-ktr). NOTES: 1. USE TEFLON TAPE ON ALL THREADED CONNECTIONS. 2. SWING JOINT AND SIDE OUTLET OF TEE TO BE SIZED EQUAL TO QCV INLET. 3. SUPPLY AND INSTALL R.W. WARNING TAG AS REQ. �i QUICK COUPLER NOT TO SCALE tO W ROUND VALVE BOX O MULTI4XITLET DRIP EMITTER PER LEGEND 8 3/4' POLYETHYLENE LATERAL 4 1/4' DISTRIBUTION TUBING 5O 3- MIN. DEPTH OF 3/4' WASHED GRAVEL © FINISH GRADE MULTI -OUTLET DRIP EMITTER NOT TO SCALE 1O SINGLE OUTLET DRIP EMITTER PER LEGEND 2O 3/4' POLYETHYLENE LATERAL 3 1/4' DISTRIBUTION TUBING 4 FINISH GRADE J SINGLE OUTLET DRIP EMITTER NOT TO SCALE Qt MULTI-OUT1.ET DRIP EMITTER 2O 3/4- POLYETHYLENE LATERAL O 1/4' DISTRIBUTION TUBING Q DISCHARGE POINT, TO BE 1- ABOVE FINISH GRADE Q6 TREE TRUNK EMITTER PLACEMENT @ TREES NOT TO SCALE OV12-0"7 OV9-04-02 36734 V 0 0 o o 6 m U o A ^ A $ 0 v4 < a o� U SU15 O S C z $ t7 Z QaiQ W ° G c �rl oH-z 1I��1I 0 LL H Ow w a. L m SoIL D � Q IY 2: (L a��=w 0o ICJ Z b w C3 0 LD-01 SCALE : NTS SHEETI6 OF 16