Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOV120701ATOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PLANNING AND 70NIN 11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE, ORO VALLEY AZ E (520)229-4800 PHONE (520) 742-1022 FAX Wnnnrv.Ci.0r0-va11ey.az.us APPLICATION FORM V Nov 12 zoos D Town of O or V, OV Case 4 (office Use Only): (- V /,;Z G` 2-- Q 1 Application Type:__ Final Plat A. Project Manager/Developer Hame: Pattie Davis Firm: Psomas Address: 800 E. Wetmore Rd., Ste 110 City: Tucson State: AZ Zip: 85719 Telephone: 5z�92-9Mn Fax: 520-292-1290 Email:_ pdavis@psomas. coin D. Property Owner (s), if more than one owner, attach list /Developer C. V Firm: Acorn Associates Architecture Limited Address:4400 E. Broadway Blvd City: Tucson State: AZ Zip:_ 85711 Telephone: 520-881-0731 Fax: Email: Subject Property Parcel/Tax Code: 223-02-014G Legal Description/Property Address: of & ADJ to Rancho Vistoso Blvd., Sec 29-11-14 Area of property: 15.23 Ae Existing Zoning: CPI Proposed Zoning: Same Is Proposed Zoning in conformance with General Plan designation? [ ] N/A [ . Yes [ ] No General Plan Designation: Commercial Park Existing Land Use: Vacant Proposed Land Use: Commercial Previous Applications Relating To This Property OV8- OV11- i_. Reason For Request Final Plat CrV' =2.0,9 -01 OV10- GV'i This application ins true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I am the owner of th:= ` .ve d scr° F een authorized by the ovrner to rnake this ,applicedon. _ ll-�• og Date 5i00, is s :V'Amin PZIrORliiS19,p plica:ionRezoninc.,�oc property or hav& TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT 11000 N La Canada Drive, Oro Valley, AZ 85737 (520) 229-4800 — Fax (520) 742-1022 April 22, 2009 Tri Miller Rick Engineering 1745 E. River Road, Suit 101 Tucson, AZ 85718 795.1000 Fax: 322.6956 RE: OV12-08-15, Golder Ranch Fire District, represented by Rick Engineering, requests approval of a development plan for a fire station within the Oracle Vista Centre, located at the northwest corner of Linda Vista and Oracle Road. Dear Mr. Miller: At their regular meeting held on April 15, 2009, the Town Council voted unanimously to approve the development plan and development plan/preliminary plat with the conditions in Exhibit "A" (attached). For resubmittal of the development plan, we require the following: • Four (4) copies of a response letter addressing all conditions in Exhibit "A" • Four (4), 24"x36" copies of the development plan • One (1) final version development plan mylar • One (1) electronic version of the development plan containing parcel lines and subdivision boundaries, lot numbers, all dimensions, and street names. The electronic version must be submitted on a CD-ROM in DXF or AutoCAD DWG format. Each of the Exhibit "A" conditions must be addressed prior to staff certifying the master development plan and development plan/preliminary plat as complete. As specified in the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised, improvements must begin within two years of development plan approval. Only the Town Council may grant extensions. To get started, if you have not already, please submit grading, paving, drainage, and wastewater improvement plans for review. Plans for onsite, offsite, and utility improvements are required. You may begin the process of establishing assurances by contacting Shirley Gay in the zoning division at 229.4800. It is also advisable to proceed with the final review of the public art for the project. The Art Review Committee (ARC) must review and approval the final design and the installation must be certified prior to issuance of a final certificate of occupancy. Please contact Shirley Gay in the zoning division at 229.4800 for the application materials for public art review. S:\PERMPLUS\DOCS\OV 1208-15\P 041509 TC ACTION.doc We look forward to the successful completion of this project. Please contact me if you have any questions. Respectfully, Matt Michels Senior Planner CC: Paul Keesler, OV Engineering Shirley Gay, OV Planning and Zoning Chief John Fink, Golder Ranch Fire Department (via fax: 825.8043) Encl: Exhibit "A" Conditions of Approval S:\PERMPLUS\DOCS\OV1208-15\P-041509 TC ACTION.doc Exhibit "A" Conditions of Approval OV 12-08-15 Golder Ranch Fire Station at Oracle Vista Centre Development Plan Planning and Zoning Conditions The development plan shall depict the six (6') screen A'all on the fire station property as described in Keynote 424 on Sheet 2 of the development plan. The wall height shall be measured from the finished grade, shall be architecturally compatible with the fire station, and shall comply with the requirements of Section 27.6.F of the Oro Valley Zoning Code. 2. All rezoning conditions shall apply, as shown on Sheet 1 of the Development Plan. Public Works Conditions All surrounding PAALs necessary for vehicular traffic access to and from this project shall be constructed prior to certificate of occupancy issuance. 4. Upon the first additional development of the Oracle Vista Center, that generates any vehicular traffic to a public street (Linda Vista Blvd., Oracle Road and Desert Sky Road), all additional improvements to the associated affected existing public roadway as identified within the rezoning conditions are required to be constructed in their entirety. Said improvements shall be constructed and accepted prior to the issuance of any additional certificates of occupancy for the Oracle Vista Center. Exhibit "A" Conditions of Approval Page 1 of 1 Golder Ranch Fire Station at Oracle Vista Centre _.._ Development Services 201 N. STONE AV., 1 ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 .JENNIFER STEPHENS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM: JENNIFER STEPHENS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: OV1207-OIA INNOVATION COMMERCE CAMPUS -CONDOMINIUM PLAT/FINAL PLAT DATE: December 1, 2008 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1.) Delete all adjacent docket and pages. 2.) Delete Road from Vistoso Commerce Loop Road on pgs. 2, 4 & �. 3.) Spell out all street suffixes on page 3. mW-MUNITED STATES AMAMPOSTAL SERVICE_ Tucson AZ 85726-9998 November 17, 2008 Shirley Gay Development Coordinator Town of Oro Valley Planning & Zoning Division 11000 N La Canada Drive Oro Valley AZ 85737-7016 SUBJECT: Construction Projects and Recommendations for Delivery of Mail RE: OV 1207-01A Innovation Commerce Campus — Condominium Plat Parcel No. 22302014G Condo Units 1 - 14 Please contact the Postal Service before purchasing or installing mail receptacles. The Postal Service is not responsible for costs incurred to move or replace mail receptacles installed prior to obtaining proper authorization. Mail receptacles must be located on the delivery line of travel established by the Postal Service. To obtain approvals necessary to initiate mail delivery, please contact the USPS at least 90 days prior to the first move in. Your Postal Service contact for this project is: Station Manager: ORO VALLEY STATION Phone Number: 520.229.0320 Robert A. Soler', Customer Relations Coordinator RAS:mdr cc: Station Manager: 85737 w/encl: "Project Checklist" INNOVATION COMMERCE CAMPUS O V 12-07-01 A Engineering Section of TC Report for Final Plat Marvin Miller February 12, 2009 Report The Town of Oro Valley Department of Public Works Staff has found that all engineering related Zoning Code items and other engineering comments have been addressed. Staff certifies and approves the engineering portion of the Innovation Commerce Campus Final Plat. This Final Plat conforms to the approved Development Plan. In addition, engineering staff finds that all property lines as presented on this Final Plat are survey able in accordance with local and State Code. M-Innovation Commerce Campus_FP_TCReport_021209 Development Services JENNIFER STEPHENS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX 4: 740-6370 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 TO: TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM: JENNIFER STEPHENS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: OV1207-OIA INNOVATION COMMERCE CAMPUS -CONDOMINIUM PLAT/FINAL PLAT DATE: December 1, 2008 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1.) Delete all adjacent docket and pages. 2.) Delete Road from Vistoso Commerce Loop Road on pgs. 2, 4 & 5. 3.) Spell out all street suffixes on page 3. $0W SOUTHWEST GAS [ORPORIIi1011 we November 19, 2008 0V/.) - c> 7-6' / ..9 Matt Michels Town of Oro Valley Planning and Zoning Division 11000 N. La Canada Dr. Oro Valley, AZ 85737 Dear Mr. Michels: Thank you for your inquiry concerning the availability of natural gas to the proposed Innovation Commerce Campus-Condominum Plat, located at Rancho Vistoso Blvd and Vistoso commerce Lp. Southwest Gas Corporation currently has a 4" PE natural gas main located on Rancho Vistoso Blvd and a 2" PE gas main on Vistoso Village Dr. Natural gas is available to serve your project in accordance with our Rule Six as filed with the Arizona Corporation Commission. Southwest Gas Corporation extends facilities based on economic feasibility. Without reviewing a preliminary engineering plan on the project, we cannot, at this time, determine what fees, if any would be required from the owner/developer. We look forward to hearing from you as plans progress. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. I can be reached at (520) 260-7198 or e-mail: Loree.Brothers@swgas.com. Sincerely, *V Loree Brothers Service Planner Southern Arizona Division Enclosure kac 29318 3401 East Gas Road / Tucson, Arizona 85714-1994 P.O. Box 26500 / Tucson, Arizona 85726-6500 / (520) 889-1888 / 1-800-428-7324 � www.swgas.com Ai s� SOUTHWEST GAS [ORPORIITI011 November 18, 2008 Town of Oro Valley Planning & Zoning Department 11000 v.La Canada Dr. Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 i�u , i '- 2198 OV1207-01A INNOVATION COMMERCE CAMPUS Southwest Gas Corporation has no objection to the platting of the above mentioned project However, existing natural gas facilities are located in adjacent right-of-way which may be affected by construction of this project. Blue Stake should be notified 48 hours prior to construction. Further information regarding natural gas facilities on or near this project may be acquired b contactin eat 794-6049. RICK BARON/ENGiNEE RING TECHNICiAiv 3401 East Gas Road / Tucson, Arizona 85714-1994 P.O. Box 26500 / Tucson, Arizona 85726-6500 / (520) 889-1888 / 1-800-428-7324 www.swgas.com Town Council Page 1 of 12 MINUTES ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION April 15, 2009 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER - 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Paul Loomis, Mayor K.C. Carter, Vice Mayor Paula Abbott, Council Member Bill Garner, Council Member Al Kunisch, Council Member Salette Latas, Council Member EXCUSED: Barry Gillaspie, Council Member PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Loomis led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS Town Manager David Andrews reviewed the upcoming meetings and events. COUNCIL REPORTS - No reports. DEPARTMENT REPORTS Communications Administrator Mary Davis invited everyone to attend the Town's 35th Anniversary events that will be held on April 17th and 18th. Town Engineer Craig Civalier announced that the Town has been awarded $1.3 million from the Federal Emergency Management Association (FEMA) for the Lomas del Oro Wash project. He further explained that the Town http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=610 11/04/2009 Town Council Page 2 of 12 would also receive some matching funds from the State for the project. TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT - No report. ORDER OF BUSINESS: MAYOR WILL REVIEW THE ORDER OF THE MEETING CALL TO AUDIENCE John Musolf, Oro Valley resident, referred to the Police Department budget and stated that it did not look like a "bare bones" budget to him. He discussed the specific areas of non -capitalized items, outside services, membership, travel and training and equipment repair and questioned whether these expenses could be eliminated, reduced or deferred further. He commented that overhead costs should be cut instead of sworn officers. Martha Briggs, Oro Valley resident, commented that during the economic downturn, many residents are using the Oro Valley Library as a resource. She stated that in March, the Library posted a 65% increase in the number of teens attending library programs. She asked that the Town Council "dig deep" and not make further cuts to the library. Larry Robinson, non -Oro Valley resident and Chair for the Facility Subcommittee for the Bicycle Advisory Committee, asked the Council to keep the Town's Multi Modal Coordinator who has facilited several projects in the Town. PRESENTATIONS Pause for Paws - No presentation. Recap of Healthiest Town in America Kick-off Event Doctor Bob Oro, Oro Valley resident, updated the Council on the Healthiest Town in America initiative. He reported that the kickoff for the program was held on January 17th at the Oro Valley Marketplace with approximately 1,200 citizens in attendance. He further reviewed upcoming events for 2009 including an Interfaith Community Services Walk, American Heart Association Walk, YMCA Step-tember, Harvest 4 Hope and the 2009 Holiday Parade. 1. CONSENT AGENDA At the request of Council Member Abbott, Mayor Loomis pulled Item B from http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=610 11/04/2009 Town Council Page 3 of 12 the Consent Agenda for discussion. MOTION: A motion was made by Vice Mayor Carter and seconded by Council Member Kunisch to approve the Consent Agenda with the exception of Item B. MOTION carried, 6-0. A. Economic Development Division Monthly Report - March 2009 B. OV12-03-16D Approval of a final plat for phase 3 of the Steam Pump Village Development, located in proximity to the northwest corner of Hanley Boulevard and Oracle Road (PULLED FOR DISCUSSION) Item B MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Abbott and seconded by Council Member Kunisch to approve OV12-03-16D, Evergreen Devco, presented by Optimus Civil Design Group, request for approval of a final plat for phase 3 of Steam Pump Village with the conditions listed in Exhibit "A". Exhibit "A" Public Works/General Comments: 1) Address all redline comments. Return the redlined set with the next submittal. 2) Provide line segment information where redlined on Sheets 2 and 3. 3) Provide additional information for the location map and legend as indicated by the redlines. Sheet 1 of 3: 4) Delete one of the acknowledgement signature blocks which has been duplicated on this sheet. Sheet 3 of 3: 5) Tie down the section line where it intersects the southern boundary line of Lot 5. 6) For clarity, provide additional property line information along the southern boundary of Block #2 to match what is described within the closure calculations. Oro Valley Water Utility: http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=610 11/04/2009 Town Council Page 4 of 12 7) Under the "assured water supply" change the language to read: "the Town of Oro Valley has been designated by the Arizona Department of Water Resources as having an assured water supply pursuant to ARS 45-576 and hereby certifies in writing to supply water to this plat". MOTION carried, 6-0. C. OV12-07-01A Approval of a final plat for the Innovation Commerce Campus commercial subdivision, located at the northwest corner of Rancho Vistoso Blvd. and Vistoso Commerce Loop Item C D. Reappointment of Richard Tracy to the Town of Oro Valley Public Safety Personnel Retirement System Board effective through September 30, 2010 Item D E. Extending terms of newly appointed Board/Commission members Item E 2. PRESENTATION AND CONSIDERATION OF ACCEPTANCE OF THE ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT, DATED APRIL 2009 Item 2 Water Utility Director Philip Saletta reviewed a PowerPoint presentation regarding the Water Utility Commission (WUC) Annual Report dated April 2009 and highlighted the following: — The report was approved by the WUC on April 13th. — Water Quality (1421 tests were performed in 2008 with no violations detected and maximum contaminant levels were not exceeded. — Customer Service - 18,330 customers (48,454 people), 295 new connections — Water Supply - Groundwater - pumped 8,625 Acre Feet (AF) (2.81 million gallons) - Reclaimed Water - delivered 1,764 AF (575 million gallons) - Effluent - 1,500 Acre Feet - Central Arizona Project Water - 10,305 AF Water usage - 2005 - 3.22 billion gallons http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=610 11/04/2009 Town Council Page 5 of 12 - 2008 - 2.81 billion gallons (reduction realized due to reclaimed water coming on line). — Water Conservation Program - Conducted 145 water audits, provided free conservation literature, rain sensor program, member of Water Conservation Alliance of Southern Arizona — Water Utility Operations (18 reservoirs, 27 booster stations, 19 operating wells, 351 miles of water mains) — Reclaimed Water System - 5 golf courses — Water System Security (fenced/locked sites, wellhead protection, motion sensors with alarms/video, hydrant defenders, emergency response plan) — Engineering and Planning (includes new development and capital improvement projects) — Central Arizona Project Water — Water Utility Funds - Enterprise Fund - Potable Water System Development Impact Fee (PWSDIF) Fund - Alternative Water Resources Development Impact Fee (AWRDIF) Fund — Debt obligations (annual debt service $4,831,490) MOTION: A motion was made by Vice Mayor Carter and seconded by Council Member Abbott to accept the Water Utility Commission Annual Report dated April, 2009. MOTION carried, 6-0. 3. PUBLIC HEARING - APPROVAL OF AN APPLICATION FOR A SERIES 12 (RESTAURANT) LIQUOR LICENSE FOR EL CHARRO CAFE LOCATED AT 7725 N. ORACLE ROAD #101 AT ORACLE CROSSINGS SHOPPING CENTER Item 3 Carlotta Flores, owner of El Charro restaurants, stated that they were excited to move their restaurant into Oro Valley and they expected to open by May 15th. She also commented that they were very pleased with the response they received from the Oro Valley staff. Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. There being no speakers, the public hearing was closed. MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Kunisch and seconded by Vice Mayor Carter to recommend approval of the issuance of the Series 12 liquor license to the Arizona State Liqyor Board for Ms. Carlotta Flores and principal at El Charro Cafe located at 7725 N. Oracle Road, #101. http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=610 11/04/2009 Town Council Page 6 of 12 MOTION carried, 6-0. 4. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. (0)09 - 03 OV9-04-02 REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A REZONING BY THE PLANNING CENTER REPRESENTING DESCO SOUTHWEST, LLC, TO CHANGE THE DESIGNATION OF THE EXISTING WASH ON THE WESTERN BOUNDARY OF THE MILLER RANCH DEVELOPMENT FROM SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R1-144) TO PARKS AND OPEN SPACE (POS), LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LA CANADA DRIVE AND TANGERINE ROAD (Continued from 3-25-09) Explanation: Desco Southwest LLC, represented by The Planning Center is requesting approval of a rezoning change. Item 4 Town Clerk Kathryn Cuvelier read a letter from the applicant requesting an indefinite continuance of this item. Discussion followed regarding the process should the item be continued indefinitely and then brought back to Council in the future, the status of the public hearing and the applicant's assumption that the item was going to be continued (applicant did not attend the meeting). Assistant Planning and Zoning Director Paul Popelka commented that the issue in this rezoning request was whether the wash was to be rezoned to Open Space or remain Residential. He explained that the rezoning would: 1) give the applicant more flexibility in the building setback, 2) provide more buildable area and 3) allow more building height. Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. Scott Christy, non -Town resident, thanked the Town for providing a buffer zone when the property was annexed into the Town and expressed concern that the applicant was wanted to reduce that buffer. Barbara Benedict, Oro Valley resident, commented that the wash bisects the property. She explained that the Tech Park would provide a buffer zone on the site. She also questioned why the wash would be disturbed. Nancy Martin, Oro Valley resident, commented that the property lies within the Wilson K-8 School boundaries. She questioned why the applicant was asking to change the existing wash from R1-144 to Park Open Space and thought that the applicant was trying to maximize their building space. She recognized the need for Tech Park but asked that the wash be left alone http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=610 11/04/2009 . Town Council Page 7 of 12 and that the Ordinance be denied. Chris Campabello, non -Town resident, stated that she felt that this was a selfish request by the developers and that in the future, they would request a General Plan amendment for a higher density on the property. She stated that if the property were rezoned, she was afraid that it would set a precedence and open up north La Canada to high density development. Kevin Houser, Oro Valley resident, stated that his concerns were the same as the other speakers and asked that the Council vote against the rezoning as he felt that the developer was working toward allowing higher buidlings and higher densities. Mayor Loomis closed the public hearing. MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Latas and seconded by Council Member Garner to deny Ordinance (0)09-03, OV9-04-02, DESCO Southwest LLC, represented by the Planning Center, request for a rezoning from R1-144, single family residential to Parks and Open Space. DISCUSSION: Council Member Kunsich stated that he would vote against the rezoning as the wash needs to be protected. He also stated that the developer could redesign the project and move the proposed two-story buildings from the north end of the property south towards Tangerine Road. Council Member Abbott commented that the restoration of the wash was part of the rezoning conditions of the property so it would be protected. Mayor Loomis commented that he would not support the motion. He stated that he was disappointed that the applicant was not at the meeting but they have stated that they wanted to try to make the development work. He also commented that the developers have worked with the neighbors and they continue to try to address issues. He felt that in not allowing the developer to rework the design, it would be setting the wrong example. Council Member Latas stated that she also appreciated that the developer has met with the neighbors. She stated that if their intention was to rework the design, they could resubmit at a later date. In response to a question from Vice Mayor Carter, Town Attorney Tobin Rosen explained that if this rezoning was denied, the applicant would have to start the process over again if they wanted to request a rezoning in the future. However, they could begin development on the property that was "hard zoned". http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=610 11/04/2009 . Town Council Page 8 of 12 Council Member Abbott commented that the developer has already been granted one continuance on this project and she felt that it would set a precedence to continue it again. MOTION carried, 5-1 with Mayor Loomis opposed. 5. OV12-08-15 APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A FIRE STATION WITHIN THE ORACLE VISTA CENTRE, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LINDA VISTA AND ORACLE ROAD Item 5 Trey Miller, Rick Engineering Company, representing Golder Ranch Fire District, reviewed a site map of the Oracle Vista Retail Center. He then reviewed the development plan for the fire station, building setbacks, bufferyards, grading concept plan and detention basin cross sections. He explained that the fire station would sit on a 1.7 acre site and has Commercial Neighborhood (C-N) zoning. Mr. Miller reviewed resolutions to previous concerns: - 6 ft. high screen wall along the west property line. - Building moved easterly to provide a 55 foot setback. - Widening to Linda Vista Boulevard is not necessary with the operation of the Fire Station. - Review of traffic data (have received a concurrence letter from Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT). Mr. Miller then reported that the master development plan was approved by the Town Council in September 2008 and the Development Review Board approved the development plan in February 2009. Assistant Planning and Zoning Director Paul Popelka reported that staff supports and recommends approval of the development plan and that the Development Review Board has also approved the building's architecture. He further commented that the project meets all Zoning Code requirements and the Oracle Road Scenic Corridor Overlay District (ORSCOD) requirements and standards. MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Kunisch and seconded by Council Member Abbott to approve OV12-08-15, applicant's request for a development plan for a fire station at the Oracle Vista Centre with the conditions in Exhibit "A". Exhibit "A": http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view id=5&clip_id=610 11/04/2009 . Town Council Page 9 of 12 Planning and Zoning Conditions: 1. The development plan shall depict the six (6) foot screen wall on the fire station property as described in Keynote #24 on Sheet 2 of the development plan. The wall height shall be measured from the finished grade, shall be architecturally compatible with the fire station, and shall comply with the requirements of Section 27.6.E of the Oro Valley Zoning Code. 2. All rezoning conditions shall apply as shown on Sheet 1 of the development plan. Public Works Conditions: 3. All surrounding PAALs necessary for vehicular traffic access to and from this project shall be constructed prior to certificate of occupancy issuance. 4. Upon the first additional development of the Oracle Vista Centre that generates any vehicular traffic to a public street (Linda Vista Blvd., Oracle Road and Desert Sky Road), all additional improvements to the associated affected existing public roadway as identified within the rezoning conditions are required to be constructed in their entirety. Said improvments shall be constructed and accepted prior to the issuance of any additional certificates of occupancy for the Oracle Vista Centre. MOTION carried, 6-0. 6. AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT OF 2009: OVERVIEW OF STAFF EFFORTS TO ADDRESS FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES AND STATUS OF THE APPLICATION FOR THE ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM Item 6 Principal Planner Bayer Vella reviewed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. He explained that the purpose of the Act was to revitalize the economy, grow jobs and obtain energy independence. He then highlighted the following: — Staff is evaluating programs and working with the Pima Association of Governments (PAG). — Grants are available. — Public Works is evaluating 4 different areas of opportunity: flood prevention, stormwater treatment, transit and transportation. — Economic Development is working with Tucson Regional Economic Opportunities (TREO) on regional opportunities. — Oro Valley Water Utility has submitted $18+ million in grant requests. — Oro Valley Police Department has submitted a grant application for retention of 6 officers. They are also looking into other grant opportunities http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=610 11/04/2009 Town Council Page 10 of 12 but many require long term committments. — Planning staff is focusing on the Department of Energy funding opportunities: 1) Grant to allow jurisdictions over 35,000 residents to apply. (Oro Valley has been allocated $164,200 but must still apply). 2) Competitive grants 3) Interest free loans - 14 eligible activities (i.e. Energy Efficiency and Conservation Strategy, Technical Consulting Services, Residential/Commercial Building Audits, Traffic Signals and Street Lighting, Renewable Energy on Government buildings) - Must priortize and then apply by June 25th. - Green Team has set other criteria to help identify focus: - Community leadership - Physical improvements to Town facilities - Proper planning and minimize Consulting/Study expense - Highest return on investment to reduce Town costs — Recommended activities: - Develop Energy Efficiency and Conservation Strategy (required) - Technical consulting services - Energy efficiency retrofits (programmable thermostats, upgrade air conditioning units, etc.) - Renewable energy technologies on government buildings (i.e. solar technology) — Grant funding approach: - Policy development with measurable outcomes - Energy Audit and opportunities = Strategy (June 25th deadline) (Staff will do 75% of work but would need assistance conducting energy audit). Discussion followed regarding: — U.S. Conference of Mayors strategy - Many communities have adopted this strategy and it would be a great starting point (commit to adopt a 7% reduction in carbon footprint). — Contact Tucson Electric Power (TEP) and Southwest Gas to see if they would be interested in assisting in energy audits (may provide free audits). — June 25th deadline - Jurisdiction can submit entire strategy at once or if you need additional time and funding to complete the strategy, a request can be submitted for partial release of funds by June 25th (if an allocation is awarded to conduct the strategy, it must be completed in 120 days). — Whether the Town submits for a partial allocation or the entire strategy, the Town's allocation would be $164,200. — Preference for immediate and tangible return. Spend as little as possible on studies and consultants. Use internal employee resources. — Performance contracting. — Look at other alternatives, not comfortable spending $25,000+ at this http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=610 11/04/2009 . Town Council Page 11 of 12 time. Need a cost benefit ratio on leases and equipment. - There would be a cost for level of standards we need to produce. Staff will explore opportunities with TEP and SW Gas. - Cost of study would be covered by grant money. Look at tangible efforts (i.e. retrofit buildings to get to LEED standards so the Town would see reduced energy bills and gain efficiencies). Green Team - develop codes and set standards for the community. Bulk of funding monies have to expended on government buidlings or non -profits. 7. CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING DIRECTING THE ORO VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION TO REVIEW C- N (NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL) AND C-1 AND C-2 (COMMERCIAL) ZONING DISTRICTS Item 7 Assistant Planning and Zoning Director Paul Popelka reported that Planning Staff was given direction to investigate commercial zones (C-N, C-1 and C-2) to better define the districts and provide clarification regarding permitted uses and development standards. Discussion followed regarding: - Are there staffing resources available to get this to the Planning and Zoning Commission prior to the new Commission coming aboard. - Created Neighborhood Commercial approximately 5 years ago. Need to look at different elements: when do you want neighborhood commercial (C- N) vs. C-1 and C-2. Should there be significant differences in allowed uses. Need convenience of commercial opportunities without having to drive a long distance. Mayor Loomis opened the floor for public comment. Bill Adler, Oro Valley resident, commented that the Zoning Code provides a chart of permitted uses and also provides wording that describes the Town's intent with regard to the zoning districts. He stated that the Town must focus on both areas. He stated that there is a long term fix (form based codes) or a quick fix that would blend the two components of the Code. He commented that the Council needs to decide whether they want a long term fix or a short term fix. Further discussion followed regarding: - The Planning and Zoning Work Plan currently focuses on neighborhood commercial (C-N). http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=610 11/04/2009 Town Council Page 12 of 12 — Staff to put together a task statement that defines the work to be done, requirements, deficiencies, and future work. Work with Planning and Zoning Commission and bring back to a Council Study Session. 8. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS - None presented. CALL TO AUDIENCE Bill Adler, Oro Valley resident, commented regarding the Town's budget problem and stated that when looking at cost cutting, the Town must understand what the impacts to levels and quality of service might be. He stated that when trying to understand cuts, you must also understand what sacrifices would have to be made. He also stated that he hoped that Council would ignore suggestions that administration positions are overhead and don't have an impact on quality service. Mr. Adler addressed travel and training and stated that the Town has to afford things that keep the level of service at an acceptable level. He questioned why the emphasis was on cuts and compromises without any public discussion on how it would impact the Town's quality of services. John Musolf, Oro Valley resident, questioned why the Police Department had a separate Public Information Officer when the Town Manager's Department had a Communication Division. He felt that discussion should take place on who should be disseminating information for the Town. He also commented that service and quality levels had been discussed at the Library Review Committee meetings. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: A motion was made by Vice Mayor Carter and seconded by Council Member Garner to adjourn at 8:00 p.m. MOTION carried, 6-0. http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=610 11/04/2009 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CONIMUNI CATION TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL FRONT: Sarah S. More, FAICP, Planning & Zoning Director MEETING DATE: April 15, 2009 SUBJECT: OV12-07-01A, Anthem Equity, represented by Psomas, requests approval of a final plat for the Innovation Commerce Campus commercial subdivision, located at the northwest corner of Rancho Vistoso Blvd. and Vistoso Commerce Loop. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: The final plat for this project entails fourteen (14) commercial lots based on the building footprints of the approved development plan. The parking and landscaped areas will be platted as common areas. The approved development plan consists of four (4) industrial buildings with a total square footage of 79,660, with the individual building's square footage at 19,915 each. In addition, there are ten (10) office buildings with a total square footage of 74,690. Each individual building is 7,575 square feet. BACKGROUND: iYal ure of Request: The final plat stage involves fonnalizing the design and site layout approved by the Town Council at the preliminary plat approval stage. Town Council approval is required prior to recordation of the final plat. Current Site Conditions: The zoning is Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development Campus Park Industrial (CPI). The site is approximately l 5.23 acres. The professional office and industrial uses are proposed. Approvals to Date: • The zoning for this site was approved in 1987 as part of the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development (PAD). In 1996, the General Plan designation of Campus Park Industrial (CPI) was adopted and reaffirmed in 2005. • The Town Council approved the preliminary plat/development plan and landscape plans on March 19, 2008. Proposed hnProvenaents: The site consists of the four (4) industrial buildings with a total square footage of 79,660, with the individual building's square footage at 19,915 each. There are ten (10) office buildings with a total square footage of 74,690. Each individual building is 7,575 square feet. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Pate 2 of 3 Surrounding Land Uses: Direction Designation Land Use North: ( Rancho Vistoso PAD — CPI RV Neighborhood 2 Phase 2 South: JRancho Vistoso PAD — C-1 j Vistoso Memorial Chapel East: ( Rancho Vistoso PAD — CPI Easy Care West: Rancho Vistoso PAD — C-1 Vacant - Undeveloped Land A. GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE: All General Plan compliance issues were addressed as part of the preliminary plat review. The final plat is in substantial compliance with all applicable General Plan goals and policies. B. RANCHO VISTOSO PAD COMPLIANCE: All Rancho Vistoso PAD compliance issues were addressed as part of the preliminary plat review. The final plat is in substantial compliance with all applicable Rancho Vistoso PAD requirements. C. OVZCR COMPLIANCE: All design issues were addressed as part of the preliminary plat review. The final plat is in substantial compliance with all applicable zoning codes. D. PUBLIC WORKS COMMENTS: The Town of Oro Valley Department of Public Works Staff has found that all engineering related Zoning Code items and other engineering comments have been addressed. Staff certifies and approves the engineering portion of the Innovation Commerce Campus Final Plat. This final plat conforms to the approved development plan/preliminary plat. In addition, engineering staff finds that all property lines as presented on this final plat are surveyable in accordance with local and State Code. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENT: This project has been noticed in accordance with Town procedures, which include the following: ® Post property • Post at Town Hall and on web No formal comments have been received to date. SUMMARY OF FACTORS: Findings in Favor: 1. The final plat meets all applicable General Plan policies, Rancho Vistoso PAD and OVZCR requirements, and OVZCR Addenduni "./l " Design Guidelines. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Pane 3 of 3 2. The Town Council approved the preliminary plat in March, 2008. 3. Neighborhood mitigation was discussed and implemented as part of the preliminary plat review and approval. Findings Against.: 1. None. SUGGESTED MOTION: The Town Council may wish to consider one of the following motions: I move to [approve, approve with conditions, OR deny] OV 12-07-01 A, the final plat for the Innovation Commerce Campus commercial subdivision. Attachments: 1. Final Plat Jeren atson, Assistant Town Manager David Andrews, Town Manager Project Manager: Matt Michels, Senior Planner cc: Jerry Edwards, PSOMAS, fax: 229.1290 Kim Acorn, Acorn & Associates, fax: 881.0995 Diana Dessy, Anthem Equity, fax: 886-1294 S:`permplus\docs\OV1207-01A\P_04-15-09 TC REPORT.doc JAN-05-2009 13:46 From:TOWN ORO OF VALLEY 5207421022 To:5202921290 P.1/11 e V Town of Oro Valley Planning and Zoning Department 11:000 N La Wada Odve Matt Michels Oro Valley AZ $5737 Senior Planner Tel 520.229.4800 To) 520.229 4822 Fox 520.742.1022 Fox 520,742.1022 Date: 12.31.08 T. Jerry Edwards Fax: .1290 Pages: it % (including cover) RE: First Review of Final Plat for Innovation Commerce Campus project, located at the northwest corner of Rancho Vlstoso Blvd. and Vistoso Commerce Loop, OV12-07.01 A. '"Please note that engineering division redlines are awaiting your pickup at our front counter. ,' 0Qr r'LJ A N 28,,, 9 4f Oro Valley JAN 0 5 2POR LANDSCAPE PLAN NNOO V ATIOO N COMMERCE CAMPUS 6ENERAL NOTES LANDSCAPP NOTES 1. TOTAL SITE AREAS 15 I5 ACRES. 2. TOTAL ACRES OF GRADED SITE IS 15 ACRES, 3. TOTAL ACRES OF OPEN SPACE REQ'D SS*B515 SF 4. TOTAL ACRES OF OPEN SPACE PROVIDED IS6512 SF 5 TOTAL ACRES OF UNDISTURBED NATURAL AREAS-0 ACRES FOR FULL DEVELOPMENT. (o. EXISTING ZONING IS PAD, CAMPUS PARK INDUSTRIAL.(CPI). 1. ADJACENT PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH 4 EAST ARE ZONED PAD, CAMPUS PARK INDUSTRIAL.(CPI). ADJACENT PROPERTIES TO THE SOUTH IS ZONED PAD, COMMERCIAL C-1. PROPERTY WEST IS ZONED PAD, CAMPUS PARK INDUSTRIAL.(CPI). 6. MINIMUM 5LDG SET5ACKS ARE: FRONT YARD- 25' REAR YARD- 30' SIDE YARD- 20' 9. 5UFFERYARD TA5ULATIONS: RANCHO VISTOSO 5LVD. 5UFFERYARD '5' 621' X 25' REQUIRED 621' X 25' PROVIDED TREES REQUIRED 31 TREES PROVIDED 50. SHRUBS PROVIDED 31 SHRUBS PROVIDE 50. ACCENTS REQUIRED 62 ACCENTS PROVIDED 15. GROUND COVER - DECOMPOSED GRANITE VISTOSO VILLAGE DR. 5UFFERYARD '5' 44V X 20' REQUIRED 449' X 20' PROVIDED TREES REQUIRED 22 TREES PROVIDED 35, SHRUBS PROVIDED 22 SHRUBS PROVIDE 35. ACCENTS REQUIRED 45 ACCENTS PROVIDED 52. GROUND COVER - DECOMPOSED GRANITE VISTOSO COMMERCE LOOP. BUFFERYARD '5' 815' X 20' REQUIRED 815' X 20PROVIDED TREES REQUIRED 44 TREES PROVIDED 53. SHRUBS PROVIDED 44 SHRUBS PROVIDE 53. ACCENTS REQUIRED 88 ACCENTS PROVIDED 88. GROUND COVER - DECOMPOSED GRANITE 10. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS WILL RECEIVE A 2' LAYER OF 1/2, DECOMPOSED GRANITE (DjG.). 11, ALL REQUIRED TREES SHALL 5E A MINIMUM 15 GALLONS IN SIZE AND AT LEAST 4096 OF THOSE TREES WILL 5E 24' 5OX, OR 24' SPADED, OR LARGER SIZE. ALL SHRUBS AND ACCENT SHALL 5E A MINIMUM OF 5 GALLON IN SIZE. ALL GROUND COVER PLANTS SHALL 5E A MINIMUM 1 GALLON IN SIZE ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL MEET THE MINIMUM STANDARDS IN THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE ARIZONA NURSERY ASSOCIATIONS GROWERSCOMMITTEE RECOMMENDED TREE SPECIFICATIONS OF NURSERYMEN AS TO SIZE, CONDITION AND APPEARANCE. 12. IN THE EVENT OF ABANDONMENT OF THE PROJECT, THE OWNER SHALL 5E RESPONSIBLE FOR REVEGETATION OF THE SITE TO IT'S ORIGINAL CONDITION. 13. AREAS DESIGNATED TO RECEIVE A NATIVE SEED MIX, SHALL UTILIZE AN APPROVED FORD VALLEY SEED MIX AS SHOWN. MAINTENANCE PROVISIONS 1. THE PROPERTY OWNER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REGULAR MAINTENANCE OF ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS. MAINTENANCE INCLUDES PRUNING, FERTILIZING, CLEARING DE5RIS AND WEEDS, AND REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF DEAD PLANTS. 2 THE PROPERTY OWNER IS iRESPONSI5LE FOR MAINTAINING THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM AS LONG AS NECESSARY TO TRANSITION PLANTS TO NATURAL SOURCES. 3. THE PROPERTY OWNER SHALL MAINTAIN ALL PLANTS AT INTERSECTIONS TO ENSURE UNOBSTRUCTED VISIBILITY TO MOTORISTS. ALL SHRU55, ACCENT PLANTS AND GROUND COVERS SHALL NOT EXCEED 2' IN HT. TREES SHALL 5E MAINTAINED TO ENSURE THAT 5RANCHES/CANOPY FOLIAGE IS NOT 5ELOW A HEIGHT OF 6 FEET. IRRIGATION NOTES PLANT LIST KEY 50TANICAL NAME COMMON NAME REMARKS SIZE QUANTITY TREES AC ACACIA CONSTRICTA WHITE THORN ACACIA SV MTIGATION 36' bo 8' box 2'1 12 AS ACACIA SALICINA WEEPING ACACIA 24' box 15 G.C. 20 21 CF CERCIDIUM FLORIDUM BLUE PALO VERDE SV MTIGATION 36' bo 48' box 4 2 Cr- CERCIDIUM FLORIDUM BLUE PALO VERDE 24' box G.C. 50 '14 CM CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLUM FOOTHILL PALO VERDE TOS SEE INV 50 CM CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLUM FOOTHILL PALO VERDE av MTIGATION 36' bo 8' box 8 ig LT LYSILOMA THORN5ERI FEATHER TREE 24' 80X 43 PV PROSOPIS VELUTINA VELVET MESQUITE 24' 50 15 G.C. 41 62 PV PROSOPIS VELUTINA VELVET MESQUITE TOS SEE INV 2 SWRU55 AC ACACIA CONSTRICTA WHITE THORN ACACIA Sv UNDERSTORY MTIGATION 5 GC. 2S AC ACACIA CONSTRICTA WHITE THORN ACACIA TO$ SEE INV 2 CP CELTIS PALLIDA DESERT HACK5ERRY SV MTIGATION 24' BOX 25 CP CELTIS PALLIDA DESERT HACK5ERRY TOS SEE INV 12 DA DASYLIRION ACROTRICHE GREEN DESERT SPOON 15 G.C. 29 DW DASYLIRION WHEELERI DESERT SPOON SV UNDERSTORY MTIGATION 5 G.C. S5 MR MUHLEN5ERGIA RIGENS DEER GRASS SV UNDERSTORY MTIGATION 92 JC JUSTICIA CALIFORNICA CHUPAROSA SV UNDERSTORY MTIGATION r2 CIL. 36 LF LEUCOPHYLLUM FRUTESCENS TEXAS RANGER 5 G.C. 48 GROUND COVERS 4 ACCENTS CG CARNEGIEA GIGANTEA SAGUARO 4-6' HT r00 CE CALLIANDRA ERIOPHYLLA FAIRY DUSTER Sv UNDERSTORY MTIGATION I G.C. 228 FW FEROCACTU5 WISLIZENII BARREL CACTUS TO$ SEE INV 106 LM LANTANA MONTIVIDENSIS TRAILING LANTANA VARY COLORS 1 G.C. 313 GR GAZANIA RIGENS TRAILING GAZANIA 1 G.C. 153 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT SGHF.DULE SYM50 DESCRIPTION SPECIFICATION QUANTITY © CONTROLLER RAIN5IR0 ESP-12MC 3 CQ 5ACKFLOW PREVEVTER FE5CO 825Y 1' I O DRIP VALVE ASSEMBLY VALVE: RAIN51RD 100 PE5 FILTER: RAIN51RD R5Y-15-200 PRESSURE RAIN51RD P6I-HM5-20 REGULATOR: 32 EMITTER RAIN51RD X5-10 2161 1. MAINLINE 4 VALVE LOCATIONS SHOWN FOR CLARITY LOCATE IN PLANTER AREAS AND WITHIN PROJECT 50UNDARY. 2. ALL MAINLINE SHOWN 15 CL200 PVC., ALL POLY SHOWN 15 1/2. 3. INSTALL ALL PIPE 5ENEATH WALKS AND PAVING WITHIN A SCH 40 PVC SLEEVE 2 SIZES LARGER THAN IRRIGATION PIPE ( PVC AND POLYETHYLENE (PE)). 4. SEE CIVIL DWG. FOR WATER SOURCE SIZE 4 LOCATION PROVIDE METER PER WATER CO. REQ'S. 19 20 2021 30 29 29 28 51-17 CPI j t � I 14 ,e-� �' Cp1 ."' 51- I CATALINA 1 I SWE PAW CM U-z3 I PROJECT & i LOCATION � cal -00 3029 _2-1 2928 31 32 BENCHMARK 3213 LOCATION MAP SCALE 3" = 1 mile A PORTION OF THE SW 1 /4 OF SECTION 29, T-11-S, R-14-E, G&SRM, ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUI'+TY, ARIZONA SEED MIX PURPLE THREE -AWN ARISTIDA PUPPUREA 2.0 L55JACRE SAND DROP SEED SPOR05OLUS CRYTHANDRUS 1.0 INDIAN WHEAT PLANTAGO INSULARIS 3.0 GL05EMALLOW SPHAERALCEA AM5IGUA 1.0 DESERT SENNA CASSIA COVESSII 2.0 BRITTLE5USH ENCELIA FARINOSA 1.5 5URSAGE AMBROSIA DELTOIDEA 4.0 TURPENTINE BUSH HAPLOPAPPUS LARICIFOLIA 1.0 DESERT MARIGOLD 5AILEYA MULTIRADIATA iS PENSTEMON PENSTEMON PARRYI 1B SIDE OATS DRAMA 5UTELOUA CURTIPENDULA 2.0 CREOSOTE LARREA TRIDENTATA 6.0 WHITETHORN ACACIA ACACIA CONSTRICTA 2.0 A50VE MIX TO INCLUDE: 1,500 L56JAC CONWE5 F15ER 300 L55JAC AMMONIUM PHOSPHATE FERTILIZER 60 L56JAC 5EST GRADE TACKIFIER APPLY GROW POWER AT A RATE OF 1000 L5S./AC. 5UFFERYARD TA5ULAT I ONS a RANCHO VISTOSO 5LVD. BUFFERYARD 'B' 62l' X 25' REQUIRED 621' X 25' PROVIDED TREES REQUIRED 31 TREES PROVIDED 50. SHRUBS PROVIDED 31 SHRUBS PROVIDE 50. ACCENTS REQUIRED 62 ACCENTS PROVIDED 15. GROUND COVER - DECOMPOSED GRANITE 2. VISTOSO VILLAGE DR. 5UFFERYARD '5' 449' X 20' REQUIRED 449' X 20' PROVIDED TREES REQUIRED 22 TREES PROVIDED 35. SHRUBS PROVIDED 22 SHRUBS PROVIDE 35. ACCENTS REQUIRED 45 ACCENTS PROVIDED 52. GROUND COVER - DECOMPOSED GRANITE VISTOSO COMMERCE LOOP. 5UFFERYARD '5' 615' X 20' a REQUIRED 815' X 20' PROVIDED TREES REQUIRED 44 TREES PROVIDED 53. SHRUBS PROVIDED 44 SHRUBS PROVIDE 53. ACCENTS REQUIRED 88 ACCENTS PROVIDED 88. GROUND COVER - DECOMPOSED GRANITE Aouna Goff sen ���cn,,,,9 Aroho"t (B(c t a 425 West Paseo Redondo Suite 3 Tucson, Arizona 85701 5. IRRIGATION DESIGN PRESSURE 30 PSI FOR SYSTEM. O V 12 - 0 7 - 01 CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXIST. WATER PRESSURE AT VALVE 4 NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF DISCREPANCIES, - INNOVATION COMMERCE CAMPUS 5ETWEEN EXISTING 4 DESIGN PRESSURE PRIOR TO CONTINUING F 4� UNITS 1-14 4 RCOMMON AREAS 'A'(DRAINAGE /OPEN SPACE/BUFFERYARD) AND WOK COMMON AREAS lB'(STREET/PARKING) BEING A COMMERCIAL CENTER SITUATED IN THE SW 1 /4 OF 6. ELECTRIC POWER TO THE CONTROLLER (S SUPPLIED BY 11Sy ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR IN LOCATIONS SHOWN. �g 1s � SECTION 29, T-11-S, R-14-E, G&SRM, ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA SCALE 1 " = 40' 1. COORDINATE WITH ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR FOR POWER SOURCE. CONTOUR INTERVAL 1 FOOT W U 00.00 U CL Z � U Q O Z z Y 1 Q c' E CLOO L � E U � L � U E W Lw �R _ a Cn . o a: �U-) CO � a W r c oa 12666 STEVE ACUNA JOB NO. 06088 ISSUE DATE 5EPT 2001 REVISIONS DRAWN BY 5A CHECKED BY 5A SHEET NO. L I ME; VIsrasa VILLAGE .,� DRIVE (J� & c P� c� Q, El It WN' k� auo ���%l• 6J � � �� - POP- I410P. /r� • q 6 c� f�r$fS c -� 6 << x ((� 16 IL 1 - Alm , 1 �I I f x < bw ¢� q 2 R? Pw r ,fir R 4 RAw� x t1c4,4 L c ' w � 00 ° °OA '* �O O 10 0.- "=40' No q- _• ff a00,�t�►,,� �, �Id . •fit, ~�/ '� O ° /'► NONMEMBER °o opt a �� ♦ a AS mm 0 rr� r �Illlllllll�l�IS � �I v� o° .•�i,�10 •'+ ery���ni�����1� ..._ ..._ ,r.�.. _ .,tee ` �►i; 4 , S ` ° ill's10.1 11 _ 121,11 b a f �e � �1 A O a („ t ti�l 04 � �p •..�� p V O O ,f� �rr•--_++ — �000 f10o �.. ;pro, ,. .• . ��..��l� 0 O C`°°/ l ! \ aill�•L`•ii� . ,. r�.� ' Ir�f'� rLr�i frt r ���.� . q G I - ���'1 ';'. - ► il�' �' �' �� � •� Off/ L01 o � °" �'� �� 'ol ��� � � ° ►�. � 'OS .. s: ♦ !� �►� � � • �� /! ® a � • Oar \ � �4 O� • _ Spo�rn,o�o�►%��i`� � . a /err w . 1-1-t-1-1.1-1 • $ —= - • .� i , : �� .��_r:.��;e:: o. 1- •� t� �� - r:� ■o �. oIToZo"'01 �'► O It_�' , ■l0,) �•a � r O �-1�- ����jf`.. , I�-11-i1t�II-11-11-. O _. � IISIL:1�-�1-11-1i-/■ 1 1 1 ��•i rim :i ' �1° al t�TO'O� ` a '�i 1-.1::.1-.i 0 0 c, .. • [O: I,��,:�,In+. ©./ � � •I, � °� •t. a �cTc•:aTai�1 IS V. ,'tom � — °O . �°.1Z�/=d0,�i�_ I ° n a.a a •ro,' , °- - ' c O �P .Oi O ° p7 ' r07i• 1 1'�t 4t G1 t O �[ sal � \ o �° r � `. �� ►-� il�p v0 NJ � o ♦ o o � i�`� �,t,, ..� ._ ���� w � — �, �, ,,�•���� oyr-• w , o � <-1 t i COi _> C <�l �) <_ A t" C i 1 I � (c C t _> onooa.,o.o• ..° :ioer:oo 000l�' c.•..i o - ■ [ oZol�li0=r "V/:O:iliono� .1 u1 . si ■ .��:01Q' 'Z>♦t[1:Ai0Io�j o Lo I 0)1 r�o=0:0t01°iBT• uo:am io.00.�, �[O:f1lOIoI°1 �' ° • � i) r 00 :•!.`.i'�%�"��^-.� O �r ��r t•t1� i� ' �� '; M"r�� I 4► ..j. • go � �.1 Loille:Qi�' I ,"IO/:iT:Oi.....,.�� ..■ �'I O - -- - - • .tom .. O _ !� I �� � O • '� • r � .try'• �!�r'�°"i �►�iir.'-�O O O �% O�y� � r,�i Vim' ' � �A 'r �_ �� �► � • � �G ' � ' i � ° s' � •� �y * ` •, � \ O �, O ! �^ ' r9~��� �� `� � �. �-'� ` � 7 = , � � ® •Cp`� _�s•■.�'��i.'-+j� ��� a�� CO° D � T� 9 '� ` � .i• O, . O� ^.-?/'►� - _ .!..� _ �� '%�_ ��:. Owl n_ !� �� .����A=�0 ,�.0� ���� . �Y wol%O OCR• I- O ` \��;: V� ° °�'�� �' o - ae�' — - ,�� -° -` �,= r1► c• o' = �' o e = r•�s,�, °.- _�,. NO �1���+ k' ■ _ • •-• LEGEND ODENOTES SIDEWALK OB DENOTES DUMPSTER SCREEN WALL OC DENOTES PASSENGER DROP-OFF OD DENOTES COURTYARD MALL AREA (DDENOTES TRAFFIC CALMING AREA O DENOTES CROSS WALK AREA p0 J; D 1' i o r, S►'F`i a 1�t ■ f I 5 8iiw u � 8 h g W Z v j 0 Ecc w� III LO w U-) = rn I �� 12666 57EVL- ACUNA EDQ� �'l=ono U•s'~ JOB NO. 06088 ISSUE DATE SEPT 200-7 REVISIONS Yw DRAWN BY CHECKED BY 5A V� SHEET NO. L:2 L 0 0 C0 0 0 CD 0 C m 4 V1ST OSO V ILLAGE p •4 ' ' — — — ,�- C� C �+ � I � ' --- a •, � bR/A I' NYC , I , C <�i�,1, I, I � I I, I, I,IJ r II t I — IIJ< 14C? .... ....... ... ... I f'VG i 8" .r TIE TO SOUR CIVIL �FOR LOCATION 8"W 8"S a A04 } IN SLEEVE 1, �3 J % SLEE 'I i iI I — r 0 i i r I J IN SLEE — _ i IN SLEEVE-- -y \ I a Ill,IJ O — 4, I , rrp I SLEE 041 4V I , i' SLEEVE - �e ri �� AO I I - rT�4 I I i - - °J rAJ I o I I•p o IN SLEEVE `4 ° — I J < _ O 0 •p 0 ^ I SLEEVE in- =mplim 11-1 I� -- FL I, o�<-4 1 'co< rL rr AR,I � �4 'io rr�� rrp �1- t�Pv— — — — — — 1ly, • __ 4 __�_------------_-_------------- _---_�------__----------- --- > ------------------- -�Tk---------------------_----------_ ---_------------- _------��- 0% 1� VIST0S0 COMMERCE LOOP I IN SLEEVE s 811w SLEEVE III u 0 p04 IRRIC/4r7ION PL,4N 1"=40' ' SL EVE `� �/ �`.✓ v VY Z L ----- --- _- ------ _-^_ ------ -�,�� VISTOSO COMMERCE LOOP i Ao4� Ac un'a ccoff son a Landscape ects 425 West Poseo Redondo Suite 3 Tucson, Arizona 85701 OV 12-07-01 -- - VATI OIL COMMERCE CAMPUS UNITS 1-14 COMMON AREAS 'A'(DRAINAGEIOPEN SPACE/BUFFERYARD) AND COMMON AREAS B'(STREET/PARKING) BEING A COMMERCIAL CENTER SITUATED IN THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 29, T-11-S, R-14-E, G&SRM, ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA SCALE 1" = 40' CONTOUR INTERVAL 1 FOOT W C3 OC W \ v ) 0 Z \ 0 aC F- aC 0 Z Z ;Z8 (El 0000 J a 9 W z= a: 5 E W �w I O �• U Qo Q U- Oa: M- CC O W v- oa LO 12666 STEVE t ACUNA S��NEO ��jtonc u.s•a JOB NO. oboaa ISSUE DATE 5EPT 2001 REVISIONS r DRAWN BY 5A CHECKED BY 5�4 SHEET NO. L3 BOMANITE EXPOSED AGGREGATE GONG. - COLOR 2 PEDESTRIAN GRO55HALK BOMANITE EXP05ED AGGREGATE GONG. - COLOR I FF.i;�E5TRI AN GR055AAL.K NO 5GALE 3TRIAN GRO55HALK ,NITE EXP05ED .ELATE GONG. OR I ,NITE EXP05ED :ELATE GONG. ,OR 2 TRAIT 1 G CALM I NC NO 50ALE 00URT`i'ARI7 SEAT I NC 3l8" = 11— 041 GATE \(SEE ARCH PLANS) *NOTE ENCLOSURE GATES MUST INCLUDE THE ABILITY TO SECURE THE GATES IN THE OPEN POSITION DURING °1% ► SERVICE AND WHEN CLOSED. ''► > :De . ' °• ' o. RECOMMEND GATES TO OPEN 180 ° D DEGREES WHERE POSSIBLE OR °°D . ► p y ° ; ° > c .> a MINIMUM 12 FEET. (QTY-4, 1 IN. 1 ° DIA.x6 IN. LONG GALVANIZED PIPE ;'. FLUSH w/CONCRETE). 11.67' e LAB '" •° a 'D'• ° 'n D, °•' d 8" CMU BLOCK WALL, 6' HIGH (SEE ARCH n> P : > tP. a a'. ° •p . ►1' ; PLANS) p'° ° POST BARRICADES, TYPE A PER PC/COT STD. 106 4' O.C. 13.4' SINGLE ENCLOSURE REFER TO DEV STD 6-01.0, FIGURE 3 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OL T.O. CMU 105 -4"— OTT.D. GMU -'-r 10 -4 OL FIN. FLR. 100 -O 2 :;V1 =5Tr=R I7r=TA I L. NO 5GALE BIKE POSITION 71 7' x 7.5' PAD PIPE RACK \ Fx EACH CLASS 1 SPACE TOARKING ACCOMMODATE 2 � BICYCLES CLEAR AREA OIL T.O. GMU 30" lob -O PER PLANS BICYCLE CLASS 1 BICYCLE CLASS 2 OL T.O. GMU _ 103 -8 PER PLANS 51 GYGL.r= FARK I NC F4 IN FLR. _ NO SCALE Y 100 -O RADIAL PARTIAL ELEVATION 3/8" = 11- O" PLAN R=50' MONUMENT 51 C N CMU NO. 3, 1YP., REF. SPEG5. _ T.O. GMU 102 -8 GMU NO. I, TYP., REF. SPECS. GMU NO. 2, TYP., REF. SPECS. l[ 1, 1-11 1� rT 1i �� ELEVATION GY*MTW=Tlr- an SEE PLANS MAX. 40' 5GREEN HALL 3/811 = 11- O" • PLAN I.1rJ/111/^LIT lml Kl SEE PLANS MAX. 40' OV 12-07-01 INNOVATION COMMERCE CAMPUS UNITS 1-14 COMMON AREAS 'A'(DRAINAGE/OPEN SPACE/BUFFERYARD) AND COMMON AREAS 'B'(STREET/PARKING) BEING A COMMERCIAL CENTER SITUATED IN THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 29, T-11—S, R-14—E, G&SRM, ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA SCALE 1" = 40' PEr NO Hi V! cl 8 � co gW L E LciE E W �w co Uco Q O M m O W V_ co O co O o Lo P - +, 12666 STEVE ACUNA JOB NO. 06088 ISSUE DATE SEPT 2007 REVISIONS DRAWN BY SA c CHECKED BY SA SHEET NO. L4 PROVID BASIN FJ3. :)OTBALL REPARED BACKFILL Tw1GE F'oon5v � PI^METER 5WRU5 PLANTING DETAIL AIL 2' DIA. X 8' WOLMANIZED — TREATED STAKES 2/TREE PLACED OUTSIDE ROOTBALL PROVIDE 4' BASIN ROOTBALL ........ PREPARED BACKFILL STAPLE ENDS TO STAKE REDUCED PRESSURE BACKPLOW PREVENTER GATE VALVE.; NO. I f ABOVE GROUND O PLUMBING TO BE GALV. PIPE W/ DI -ELECTRIC FITTINGS INSULATE W/ INSULATING TAPE 3/4' RUBBER HOSE OVER DOUBLE STRAND 12 GA GALV. Z ANNEALED WIRE TREE PLANTING DETAIL NTS X GATE VALVE NO. 2 INSTALL UNIONS AT BOTH ENDS F.G. FLOW SEE C.O.T. MANUAL OF BACKFLOW AND CROSS CONNECTION CONTROL AND TUCSON WATER S.D. 1502 5ACKFLOW PREVENTER DETAIL I' ABOVE GRADE �n PORT TO SURFACE EMITTER POLYETHYLENE (P.E.) EMITTER DETAIL BRICK SUPPORT NCM- 1 Q" UTTER FEAR C-H:aJD 4 EMITTE�R& FIR TFO,= VALVE 5OX F.G. MANUAL FLUSHING END PLUG Tt 1/2 CU. FT. 3/4' GRAVEL SUMP I I ' POLYETHYLENE HOSE END CAP DETAIL WRAP AROUND 1/2' PIPE 15 TIMES PRESSURE REGULATOF BRICK SUPPORT — (4) VALVE BOX W/ COVER ,VALVE ASSET" 5L Y MAINLINE t WIRING F.O. POLYETHYLENE F.G. WIRES TO CONTROLLER AUTOMATIC VALVE SCH 60 PVC RISER 8' DEEP GRAVEL SUMP BELOW VALVE BOX 3/4' GRAVEL Lam- MAINLINE f SLEEVES UNDER PAVING SHALL BE AT AN 18" DEPTH. TRENCHING DETAIL AC UR( a 00ff88n Landscape Arr chotec is 425 West Paseo Redondo Suite 3 Tucson, Arizona 85701 OV 12-07-01 INNOVATION COMMERCE CAMPUS UNITS 1-14 COMMON AREAS 'A'(DRAINAGElOPEN SPACE/B UFFER YARD) AND COMMON AREAS B'(STREET/PARKING) BEING A COMMERCIAL CENTER SITUATED IN THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 29, T-11-S, R-14-E, G&SRM, ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA SCALE 1" = 40' CONTOUR INTERVAL 1 FOOT cc Wlu LOi E � Lb I o Co U >- o 45 4 Q� tY] ti 0 Uj Co 0 T o 12666 STEVE ACUNA JOB NO. 06088 ISSUE DATE 5EPT 2007 REVISIONS tir DRAWN BY 5A CHECKED BY 5A SHEET NO. LS NAT V P AN PR 8 RVAT ON INN%In.�IVAT ON COMMERCE CAMPUS GENERAL NOTES: 1. TOTAL 51TE AREAS 15 15 ACRES; D 15TURBANGE AREA = 51TE AREA SITE CALCULATIONS TOTAL 51TE AREA 653400 SF (I5 AG) TOTAL AREA PRESERVED 0 5F (0 AC.) TOTAL AREA DISTURBED 653400 SF TOTAL SITE RESOURCE INVENTORY AREA 66,000517 (1.5 AG.) TOTAL AREA DISTURBED (SRI) 66,000 5F (1.5 AC.) 2. THE PLANT INVENTORY METHOD HAS USED FOR THI5 PRESERVATION PLAN 3. THE EXISTING PLANT MATERIAL 15 IN MODERATE GOND I TI ON. 4. THE PLANT INVENTORY HAS PERFORMED BY ON -SITE INSPECTION AND THE ANALYSIS OF THE AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH. 5. THE NORTH 51 DE OF ALL SAC UARO AND BARREL CACTUS PROGRAMMED FOR TRAN5PLANTI NC SHALL BE MARKED PRIOR TO REMOVAL TO ENSURE PROPER ORIENTATION IN THE I R NEW LOCATION. 6. ALL NATIVE VEGETATION MITIGATION, SALVAGE AND PRESERVATION PLANS SHALL BE INTEGRATED INTO THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. 7. MAINTENANCE I N STORAOE A. ALL 5ALVA6ED PLANT SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN THE STORAGE AREA ON A WEEKLY BA515 UNTIL THEY ARE INSTALLED IN THEIR FINAL LOCATION. B. A TEMPORARY AUTOMATIC, DRIP IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE 5TORA6 E AREA IRRIGATING ALL TREES AT REGULAR INTERVALS TO PREVENT DE51 CCATI ON PRIOR TO FINAL PLANTI N6. G. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE INSPECTED FOR I N5EGT ACTIVITY WEEKLY AND SHALL BE TREATED W 1 TH SYSTEM I C, PE5TI G I DE IF EVIDENCE OF INSECTS 15 FOUND. D. A SLOW RELEASE FERTILIZER SHALL BE USED FOR ALL TREES IN 5TORAC E. 8. PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS AND PROFESSIONAL PRACTICES FOR THE SALVAGING AND TRANSPLANTING OF PROTECTED NATIVE PLANTS HILL BE FOLLOHED. q . ADDITIONAL PLANTS MAY BE DEEMED SALVAGEABLE BY THE ZONING INSPECTOR AND SHALL BE SALVAGED. 10. ANY BOXING PRIOR TO THAT TIME HHEN THE APPLICANT MAY APPLY FOR A GRAD I NG PERMIT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE PLANING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR AND HILL BE PERFORMED AT THE APPL I CANTS OWN RISK. 11. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR FINAL LOCATION OF SALVAGED PLANT MATERIAL. 12. ZONING: RANCHO VIST050 PAD GPI 13. ALL 5ALVA0E PLANS SHALL BE FIELD CHECKED BY ZONING I NSPEGTOR, PRIOR TO APPROVAL. IF THERE: ARE ANY GHANCES TO THE 5ALVA6E PLAN, BASED ON THE FIELD GHECK,THE SALVAGE PLAN SHALL BE REVISED. 14. ALL SAGUAROS AND BARREL GAGTI ARE TO BE SALVAGED AND TRANSPLANTED ON-51TE. ALL 5AGUARO5 AND/OR BARREL GAGTI DESTROYED, SHALL BE MTITOATED FOR BY REPLACEMENT OF SAME SPECIES, H 1 TH A REPLAGEMENT RATIO TO BE DETERMINED BY THE ZONING INSPECTOR. 15. ALL 515NIFICANT VEGETATION DESTROYED, SHALL BE MTITGATED FOR BY REPLAGEMENT OF SAME SPECIES, H1 TH A REPLACEMENT RATIO TO BE DETERMINED BY THE ZONING I N5PECTOR. 16. REFER TO OVI2-07-01 DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN GENERAL NOTES FOR CONSISTENCY IN DEVELOPMENT. 17. THE SITE 15 WITHIN THE ORACLE ROAD SCENIC, CORRIDOR OVERLAY D15TRIGT (OR5GOD) AND ALL RGU I REMENT5 APPLY. 0. ADJACENT PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH � EAST ARE ZONED PAD. ADJACENT -PROPERTIES TO THE SOUTH IS ZONED PAD. PROPERTY HEST 15 ZONED PAD. Iq. THE PROPERTY 15 WITHIN THE ORACLE ROAD SGENIG CORRIDOR OVERLAY DISTRIGT (ORSGOD) AND SHALL ABIDE BY ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS. 51TE VEC ETAT I Old 51TE VEGETATION OTHER THAN SI CN I F I GANT AREAS OF VEOETATI ON GON515T5 OF A PALO VERDE, BUR5A6E VEGETATION TYPE. NO ENDANGERED OR SAFEGUARDED PLANT 5PEGIE5 HERE FOUND AT THI5 LEVEL OF ANALYSIS. SAGUAROS GREATER THAN 12 FEET IN HEIGHT HERE NOT FOUND. S I CN I F I GANT VEGETATION AND AREA PROPOSED TO BE DISTURBED ARE 5HOHN ON THE 51TE RESOURCE INVENTORY TREES VELVET MESQUITE FOOTHILL PALO VERDE BLUE PALO VERDE HH I TETHORN AGAG I A GAGTI MAMMALARIA F15HHOOK BARREL GAGTU5 PRICKLY PEAR GAGTUS HEDGEHOG GAGTUS UNDER5TORY PLANTS CREOSOTE BUSH TRIANGLE -LEAF BURSAGE DESERT HAGKBERRY HHI TE THORN AGAG I A PLAN PLANT SYMBOL KEY TACO SYMBOL PLANT TYPE DESCRIPTION TREE NON -VIABLE GM-i I p TREE PRESERVE -IN -PLACE CM- I ITREE v REMOVE FROM 51TE GM-11 <+ TREE TRANSPLANT ON S I TE a5HRUB/GACTU5 NON-V I ABLE GP-11 O SHRUB/CACTUS PRESERVE -IN -PLACE GP -II x SHRUB/CACTU5 REMOVE FROM 51TE GP -II< > SHRUB/CACTUS TRANSPLANT ON SITE PROJECT LOCATION 19L20 _ LOCATION MAP 20 21 T 29128 'lei l , i >� 29128 32133 SCALE 3" = 1 mile A PORTION OF THE SW -1/4 OF SECTION 29, T-11-S, R-14--E, G&SRM, ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA NATIVE PLAIN PRESERVATION PLAID SUMMARY SYMBOL PLANT RFS T05 PIP NV TOTAL PLANTS AG Acacia constricts 0 2 0 81 &5 GF Gercidlum florldum O O 0 3 3 GM Gercidlum micro h Ilum 0 50 1 86 137 GP Geltis pallicla O 12 0 45 60 FW Ferocactus wislezenli O 106 0 2 105 PV Prosopis velutino O 2 II 13 TOTAL 405 SRI SUMMARY TOTAL TREES: 37 REMOVED SHRUBS: 33 REMOVED SRI 5F: 6606q 5R1 AG: 1.5 SRI DISTURBED 5F: 6606q SRI DISTURBED AG: 1.5 AREA OF 15% OR GREATER: 17076 S.F. 00"0' 51TE RESOURCE INVENTORY - RESOURCE AREA TOWN OF ORO VALLEY' NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SALVAGE AND MITIGATION PLAN APPROVED BY: PLANNINO AND ZoNIN6 ADMINISTRATOR DATE ov i z-o7-oi INNOVATION COMMERCE CAMPUS UNITS 1-14 COMMON AREAS 'A'(DRAINAGE�OPEN SPACE/BUFFERYARD) AND COMMON AREAS B'(STREET/PARKING) BEING A COMMERCIAL CENTER SITUATED IN THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 29, T-11—S, R-14—E, G&SRM, ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA SCALE 1" = 40' CONTOUR INTERVAL 1 FOOT W U w O::) U CL Z 2 OV H O z z �S W z a: o U) V o Lid � Lb D o cn ' l.J Q o Q � � Lo <t M mo uj ' . 000 00 12666 STEVE ACUNA JOB N� 06088 ISSUE DATE SEPT 200-7 REVISIONS DRAWN BY SA CHECKED BY 5A SHEET NO. LF11 SITE RESOURCE INVENTORY Al� 'RI 1-11 - _� - `�_ - I W -A SUMMARY TOTAL REMOVALS �VA TREES- 31 08, Al, 01 W HRU55: 33 "N A IN- 2� N, 'P, AREA 5RI SF: 6606)'b P, 1 om,*` WON AREA 51RI AC; 1.5 AREA 5RI D 15TUR5EC) 5F AREA 5iRl D15TUR5ED AC: 1.5 Di SITE RESOURCE INVENTORY g, E AREA RESOURC �D* W R Y t 0, W E "A 7 A X 0- t_71 W_ p f R 7 A; J j 5A N, N '.Z Vtr TE "15 M�3'4pn A W, 0_� 7 & A g i Willw! � AB g 3& 5 k! k 4 R All 4� Wrplw ir -if aW F, k 6m r�,2 � Of, .maill� "'w t 15 55:1 41 U P �:AR _P, livf �,L A" 41M 4 4 M W1, �'71 -2 T, e Nt Z" M LLj 46�� 'o' 0 alp *A aA04" A W, L WG 3- 0, W PLANT 5YM50L KEfo TAG 5YM50L PLANT TYPE DF-SCRIPTION CM-11 TREE NON-VIAaLE TREE PRESERVE -IN -PLACE CIM-11 0 x TREE f;;eMOvE FROM 51TE CM-11 TREE TRANSPLANT ON CP-11 SHRU5/CACTU5 NON-VI,45LE CF-11 SHRU5/CACTU6 PRESERVE - IN -PLACE SHRU5/CACTU5 REMOVE FROM SITE CP-11 SHRU5/CAC I WE, TRANSPLANT ON 51TE NOTE: 1. SEE SHEET 3, FOR DOCUMENT TA5ULATION OF NATIVE PLANT Y PRE5ERVATION PLAN INVENTOR PER SPECIE5, T)43 NUM5ES STATUS, VIA51LITY AND ,ye" TRAN5PLANTA5ILITY NOTE5 K P, W Yl, A �2 _4 2 --� , r , -, - 7 -77 *, ORO 4m X I 440 cm IE)3 iw g a g"g 6 7-7 �,l W. R WO, 77,11, 4 A 3P % % A Au "M 4— Wz", 10 * ...... 25 W IV - .3 14 _F c--M-2 -4. 44", OX� 0P V 0m WP 40 A4 Al e � p4g, �T 4 "AM 0 _4 7 50v -J. L 414 p P3 ft N70 F� p N X# 2 411 -fp" 4 4C,-161 -0c Z Ilk W� �4 5 K 75m�. 3- Ic -11 W g M'K 04Z J m 15 m W`7 01, Ira A _lF OMM - 411, "A" p, < 2 NMI R, (Av 2 k `99,5 - 36( 0-` "0 1W "'g 'M� M v 0 </ q-, % '10N , W-4 41 ------ lp N, 'zt 01, �R 7W, �-4 e- "i, N 0 v� A'S Wht 7W v 2 X, 15 m m L P, wrw la 2, & g, w,, % M il�:�30 711:�1�1'�'ll , �, - �W I r �7 T;F, 1,1-i WI 4:9P A dt `7 ,A, A MOW % dY or ME z__ x . . . . . . . . . . 6 77-777F, 0% ,Vl �,.Qsm NATIVE PLANT INVENTONT 5GALE: I" - 40'6ONTOUR INT. I FOOT _�Q -A FW, 20 IF a 0 V, a 4,� v_ 0 -01 —07 V 12 )MME N, 4, 7"1 2 vi t RCE CAMPUS —14 UNITS 1 COMMON AREAS W(DRAINAGE�OPEN SPACE/BUFFERYARD) AND COMMON AREAS B'(STREET/PARKING) T. BEING A COMMERCIAL CENTER SITUATED IN THE SW 1/4 OF TION 29, T-11—S, R-14—E, G&SRM, ORO VALLEY, PIMA SEC WWI. RC, -Z L t A N',,, , COUNTY, ARIZONA SCALE 1" = 40' CONTOUR INTERVAL 1 FOOT VF, uj Rtz- 47641L 41 a in Li hLo l w LU LL 19) E F— (a LO E (z) L.6 U u') W Lf) M ::) C) U) U >: a: ul) A*L LL. ��W_ v 12666 STEVE ACUNA COW'.", JOB NO. 0(005& ISSUE DATE 5EPT 2001 REVISIONS ACACIA CONSTRiCTA TAG NUMBER S iZE VIA, AC 141 8' Ls — AC 143 8' L* AC 144 8' L** AC 150 8' L** AC Si 16' L*** AC 152 8' L* AC 154 8° L** AC 155 4' L** AC 156 8' L* AC, 166 8' L* AC 167 8' M AC 169 4' L** AC 171 8' L* AC i14 4' L* AC 115 4' L** AC 116 4' L* AC 177 4' L* AC 182 4' L* AC 183 8' L** AC 184 4' L * * AC 186 4' L* AC 161 8" L* AC 189 8' L AC 192 4' L* AC 193 as L** AC 194 4" L* AC 195 8' L* AC 196 8' L* AC 198 5' L* AC 199 8' M AC 200 8' L* AC 201 4' L* AC 202 12' L* AC 203 4' L* AC 208 16' L*** AC 209 5' L* AC 210 8' L** AC 211 4' L* AC 213 4' L* AC 214 5' Ls AC 215 16' L* AC 216 5' L** AC 221 4' L* AC 226 8' L** AC 221 8' L* AC 225 8' L* AC 230 8' L* AC 231 8' L** AC 231 12' L** AC 236 8' L* AC 240 8' L** AC 244 8' L.** AC 246 8' L* AC 260 8' L** AC 262 4' L* AC 263 8' L** AC 265 4' L* AC 266 4' L* AC 261 8" L** AC 2ro6 12' L** AC 210 12' L * * AC 23 8' L** AC 214 8' L** AC 265 12' L* AC 28S 8' L* AC 297 8' L* AC 300 8' L * * AC 305 8' L AC. 311 8' L* AC 312 8' L** AC 313 8' L* AC 336 8' L** AC 343 8' L** AC 346 8' L* AC 341 811 L* AC 346 8' L* AC 354 8' L* AC 366 12' L** AC 389 12' L * * AC 393 8' Ls AC 403 4' L** AC 404 4' IL** AC 405 8' L** CERCiDiUM FLORiDUM TACK jNUM5ER 51ZE ViA. CF -13 8" L * * CF 206 8' L** CF 396 let L** CERCIDIUM MiCROPHYLLUM TAG NUMBER 51ZE ViA. CM 1 8' M CM 4 12, M CM 6 4" M CM 11 12' M CM 19 12, M CM 21 8' M CM 22 12' M CM 23 12' L* CM .24 8' M CM 12-1 12' M CM 32 4' M CM 35 8' L** CM 36 4' L** CM 39 12' M CM 51 4' L* CM 56 12' M CM 57 4' L CM 58 16 " M CM 59 16 " M CM 60 16 ° L* CM 61 12' M CM 63 8" M CM 64 4' L* CM 67 16 ° V CM 68 20' L*** CM 69 20' M CM 71 8' M CM 72 8' M CM 76 4' L* CM 77 8' L* CM 78 16" L* CM '19 8' M CM 81 4' L** CM 62 8' L* CM 83 4' L* CM 86 12' L* CM las 12' L * * CM 90 12' Ls CM 91 16' L*** CM 92 8' M CM 94 16" L*** CM 96 8' M CM 9i 12' M CM 1100 V L*** CM 101 8" M CM 126 4' L* CM 12-1 8' L* CM 1128 4' L* CM 129 16' L*** CM 130 fro L*** CM 133 8' L** CM 134 4' M CM 136 12' L* CM 131 20' L* CM 138 4' M CM 139 8' M CM 145 € s L CM 146 12' Ls CM 141 it ' L*** CM 146 12' L * CM 149 8' L * * CM 153 4' L** CM 155 8" L* CM 159 16' L* CM 1ro0 12' L** CM 161 4" M CM 162 4' L * CM 163 12' M CM 165 20' L.*** CM 168 $" M CM 119 8' M CM 161 8" M CM 188 20' L*** CM 190 4' L** :CM 191 4' IM CERCIPI M MiCROPHYLLUM TACK NUMBER SiZE VIA. CM 232 4' M CM 239 16' L*** CM 255 all M CM 251 Iro L*** CM 259 4' M CM 261 4' M CM 269 IV L*** CM 211 16" L* CM 212 20' L*** CM 260 4' L* CM 264 4' M CM 125e 4' L* CM 12cJO 16" L*** CM 291 8" M CM 292 4' M CM 294 12' L* CM 295 8' L** CM 296 20' L*** CM 298 24' L*** CM 299 20' L*** CM 1301 4' L** CM 1302 12' L* CM 306 16' M CM 30S 8" M CM 310 20' L*** CM 314 16' L*** CM 315 12' Ls CM 316 12' L** CM 31-1 16' L*** CM 316 12' L * * CM 319 8" L * * CM 321 4' M CM 323 16 L*** CM 326 8' M CM 321 8' M CM 325 8' M CM 329 12' L* CM 330 16" L** CM 331 12' Ls CM 333 16" L*** CM 334 12' L** CM 338 20' L*** CM 1340 Iro L*** CM 344 12' L* CM 360 12' M CM 361 8' M CM 362 12' L* CM 366 12' L* CM 369 12' V CM 1311 12' L** CM 313 4' L* CM 371 8' V CM 13IC3 12' V CM 380 4' L * * CM 385 4' L* CM 387 12' L* CM 390 12' L* CM 394 4" L * CM 395 4" L** CM 397 12' L* CM 398 4' L** CM 13es 24' L*** TABLE KEY H HiGH VIABILITY M MEDIUM VIABILITY L LOW ViA51LiTY VIABILITY NOTE * SOILS CONSTRAINT ** POOR FORM *** SiZE/AGEMEALTI-I CELTiS PALLID% TACK NUMBER SIZ VIA. CP 14 5' L** CP 15 3' L* CP 16 2' L** CP 1i 3' L** CP 25 9' L** CP 65 6' L** Ci= 66 6' M CP 70 NA L** CP i4 5' L* CP 151 5' M CP 88 4' M CP 93 5' L * * CP 95 5' M CP 125 4' L** CP 135 4' M CP 1140 5' L * * CP 150 2' M CP 185 6' L** CP 205 6' L** CP 20-1 5' L* CP 234 5' L** CP 235 5' L** CP 236 8' IM CP 241 4' M CP 242 6' L** CP 243 5' M CP 245 6' L** CP 241 2' L* CP 248 5' L** CP 249 4' L** CP 250 5' L** CP 251 5' L** CP 253 6' L* CP 256 4' L* CP 256 4' M CfP 1215 6' L** CP 216 6' L** CP 271 4' L* CP 121c3 4' L** CP 261 5' L** CP 262 4' L* CP 283 4' L** CP 266 4' M CP 303 4' L** CP 1304 5' L** CP 341 3' L** CP 342 4' L* CP 349 3' L** CP 350 5' L* CP 1351 6' L* CP 1352 4' L* CP 353 3' L* CP 355 5' L* CP 356 4' L* CP 351 6' L* CP 1356 9' L*** CP 359 6' L * * CP 364 3' L* CP 312 5' M CP 402 3' L * * CP 170 2' L** PR WFIS VELUTiNA TAG NUMBER SiZE VIA, PV 75 16" L* PV 142 12' L* PV 112 SN L* PV 116 8' V PV 197 4' L* PV 212 16' L** PV 252 20' L** PV 301 4' L* PV 320 8" V PV 324 12' L* PV 310 12' L* PV 39i 16' L** PY 392 16" L** EEROCACTUS WISLEZENIi FEROC4CTUS WISLEZENI1 TAG NUMBER SiZE ViA. FW 2 2' M FW 3 1' M FW 15 3' M FW 7 2' M FW 8 2' M FW 9 2' M FW 10 3' M FW 12 3' M FW 13 3' M FW 18 3' M FW 20 1' M FW 26 1' M FW 28 3' M FW 29 2' M FW 30 3' M FW 31 2' M FW 33 3' M FW 34 4' M FW 31 3' M FW 38 2' IM FW 40 3' M FW 41 3' M FW 42 3' M FW 43 2' M FW 44 3' M FW 145 3' M FW 46 2' M FW 41 2' M FW 48 2' M FW 49 3' M FW 50 2' M FW 52 3' M FW 53 3' M FW 54 3' M FW 55 2' M FW 62 3' M FW 80 3' M FW 64 1' M FW 85 1' M FW 98 3' M FW 99 3' M FW 102 3' M FW 103 2' M FW 104 1' M FW 1105 1' M FW 106 1' M FW 107 2' M FW 1106 1' M FW 109 3' M FW 110 1' M FW 111 3' M FW 112 2' M FW 113 3' M FW 114 3' M FW 115 3' M FW 1116 2' M FW 111 3' M FW 118 3' M FW 119 4' M FW 120 3' L* FW 121 3' M FW 122 3' M FW 123 3' M FW 124 2' M FW 131 3' M FW 1132 4' M FW 151 2' M FW 164 2' M FW 113 1' M FW 204 1' M FUJ 211 1' M FW 216 3' M FW 12le 2' M FW 220 1' M FW 222 3' M FW 1223 2' M FW 224 3' M FW 225 3' M FW 229 2' M FW 233 3' M FW 254 2' M FW 1264 2' IM FW 1216 2' IM TAG NUMBER SIZE ViA. FW 281 2' M FW 293 3' M FW 1305 1' M FW 322 3' M FW 325 3' M FW 332 4' M FW 335 2' M FW 331 3' M FW 339 2' M FW 345 3' L * * FW 363 2' M FW 365 2' M FW 3rol 2' M FW 13roa 2' M FW 314 3' M FW 315 1' M FW 376 2' M FW 131& 1' M FW 381 3' M FW 362 3' M FW 1383 2' L* FW 1364 2' M FW 366 1' M FW 400 1' M FW 401 1' M SRi Plant Mitigation Summary (Significant Vegetation) Tacl Tqpe Status Size Name Botanical Name Mitigation Required Mitigation Provided* 23 Tree N 12' Foothill Paloverde Cercidium micro h Ilum 3 3 25 Shrub N 18' Desert Hackberr Celtic pallida 1 1 51 Tree N 4' Foothill Paloverde Cercidium microeNlIum 3 3 60 Tree N 16' Foothill Paloverde Cercidium micro h Ilum 3 3 64 Tree N 4' Foothill Paloverde Cercidium micro h llum 3 3 65 Shrub N 12' Desert HackberrS Celtis pa Ilida 1 I 66 Tree N 20' Foothill Paloverde Cercidium micro h lium 3 3 10 Shrub N 14' Desert Wackberrq Celtis pallida I 1 13 Tree N 8' Blue Palo Verde Cercidium floridum 3 3 14 Shrub N 10' Desert Hackberrq Celtis 12allida 1 1 15 Tree N 16' Mesquite Prosol2le velutina 3 3 89 Tree N 12' Foothill Paloverde Cercidium m1croj2NIlum 3 3 202 Tree N 12' UJhitethorn acacia Acacia constricta 3 3 203 Tree N 4' UJhitethorn acacia Acacia constricta 3 3 205 Shrub N 12' Desert Hackberry Celtis pallida I i 206 Tree N 8' Blue Palo Verde Cercidium floridum 3 3 201 Shrub N 10' Desert Hackberr Celtis 12allida i i 208 Tree N 16' UJhitethorn acacia Acacia constricta 3 3 209 Tree N 8' UJhitethorn acacia Acacia constricta 3 3 210 Tree N 8' UJhitethorn acacia Acacia constricta 3 3 211 Tree N 4' UJhitethorn acacia Acacia constricta 3 3 234 Shrub N 10' Desert HackberrS Celtis pallicla 1 1 235 Shrub N 10' Desert Wackberry Celtis pallida 1 1 231 Tree N 12' UJhitethorn acacia Acacia constricta 3 3 238 Tree N 8' 111kitethorn acacia Acacia constricta 3 3 23S Tree N IV Foothill Paloverde Cercidium micro h Ilum 3 3 240 Tree N 8' UJhitethorn acacia Acacia constricta 3 3 242 Shrub N IT Desert HackberrS Celtis pallida 1 1 244 Tree N 8' UJhitethorn acacia Acacia constricta 3 3 245 Shrub N 12' Desert Wackberry Celtis pallida 1 1 246 Tree N 8' UJhitethorn acacia Acacia constricta 3 3 241 Shrub N 4' Desert HackberrS Celtis pallida 1 I 248 Shrub N 10' Desert Hackberrq Celtis pallida 1 1 249 Shrub N 8' Desert HackberrS Celtis 12allida 1 1 250 Shrub N 10' Desert HackberrS Celtis 12allida 1 1 251 Shrub N 10' Desert HackberrS Celtic pallida I I 252 Tree N 20' Mesquite Proso is velutina 3 3 253 Shrub N 12' Desert Hackberrq Celtis pallida 1 1 212 Tree N 20' Foothill Paloverde Cercidium micro h llum 3 3 214 Tree N 8' Ulhitethorn acacia Acacia constricta 3 3 215 Shrub N 12' Desert Hackberrq Celtic 12allida 1 1 216 Shrub N 12' Desert Hackberrs Celtic pallida 1 1 211 Shrub N 8' Desert Nackberr Celtis pailida 1 1 219 Shrub N 8' Desert Hackberrq Celtis pallida 1 1 280 Tree N 4' Foothill Paloverde Cercidium micro h llum 3 3 281 Shrub N 10' Desert Hackberrs Celtis pallida 1 1 282 Shrub N 8' Desert Hackberr.4 Celtis pallicla 1 1 283 Shrub N 8' Desert Nackberr Celtis pallida 1 1 285 Tree N 12' UJhitethorn acacia Acacia constricta 3 3 Total 101 101 *NOTE: SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR MITIGATION PLANT MATERIAL PROVIDED. TABLE KEY N NON -VIABLE T TRANSPLANT ON 51TE P PRESERVE IN PLACE R REMOVE FROM SiTE NOTE: ALL PLANTS RATED HIGH (i-I) OR MEDIUM (M) ViA51LiTY WILL BE TRANSPLANTED ON -SITE. SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN. OV 12-07-01 INNOVATION COMM ER CE CAMPUS UNITS 1-14 COMMON AREAS 'A'(DRAINAGQOPEN SPACE/BUFFERYARD) AND COMMON AREAS B'(STREET/PARKING) BEING A COMMERCIAL CENTER SITUATED IN THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 29, T-11-S, R-14-E, G&SRM, ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA SCALE 1" = 40' CONTOUR INTERVAL 1 FOOT W U W O� U � Z � OU O z z z T z f-- OL } z Ln Q � E grl_ h Loco) gg o -w ITS U LQ_ E W Lw 00 U Q o �LO Q o" � M m ►- O u.i o °O 0 El �j 12666 STEVE ACUNA JOB NO. 0(0088 ISSUE DATE 5EPT 2007 REVISIONS DRAWN BY 5A CHECKED BY 54 SHEET NO. LF5 Al 1-71_ - „-), GENERAL NOTES: 1. TOTAL SITE AREAS 15 15 ACRES; D 15TURBANGE AREA = 51 TE AREA SITE CALCULATIONS TOTAL SITE AREA 653400 SF (15 AG.) TOTAL AREA PRESERVED O SF (0 AG.) TOTAL AREA DISTURBED 655400 SF TOTAL 51 TE RESOURCE INVENTORY AREA 66,000 SF (1.5 AG.) TOTAL AREA DISTURBED (SRI) 66,000 SF (1.5 AG.) 2. ALL SALVAGE PLANS SHALL BE FIELD CHECKED BY ZONING INSPECTOR, PRIOR TO APPROVAL. IF THERE ARE ANY GHANGE5 TO THE SALVAGE PLAN, BASED ON THE FIELD GHEGK,THE 5ALVAOE PLAN SHALL BE REVISED. 3. ALL 5A6UARO5 AND BARREL CACTI ARE TO BE SALVAGED AND TRANSPLANTED ON -SITE. ALL 5AOUAR05 AND/OR BARREL CACTI DESTROYED, SHALL BE MTITGATED FOR BY REPLACEMENT OF SAME SPECIES, WITH A REPLACEMENT RATIO TO BE DETERMINED BY THE ZONING INSPECTOR. 4. ALL SIGNIFIGANT VEGETATION DESTROYED, SHALL BE MTITOATED FOR BY REPLACEMENT OF SAME SPECIES, WITH A REPLAGEMENT RATIO TO BE DETERMINED BY THE ZON I NC INSPECTOR. 5. THE PROPERTY 15 W 1 TH I N THE ORACLE ROAD SGEN I G CORRIDOR OVERLAY D 15TRI GT (OR5GOD) AND SHALL ABIDE BY ALL APPLICABLE REOU I REMENT5. S I C N I E I GANT VEGETATION THOSE AREAS OF THE SITE IDENTIFIED AS WASH AREAS HAVE BEEN DES 1 ONATED AS AREAS OF 51 G N I F I GANT VEGETATION DUE TO PLANT QUALITY, DENSITY. TREES VELVET MESQUITE FOOTHILL PALO VERDE BLUE PALO VERDE WH I TETHORN AGAG I A SITE VEGETATION CACTI F15HHOOK BARREL CACTUS UNDERSTORY PLANTS DESERT HAGKBERRY TRI ANOLE-LEAF BUR5A6E BUSH MUHLY CANYON RAGWEED CREOSOTE BUSH SITE VEGETATION OTHER THAN 516 N I F I GANT AREAS OF VEGETATION CONSISTS OF A PALO VERDE, MESQUITE BURSACCE VEGETATION TYPE. NO ENDANGERED OR SAFEC UARDED PLANT SPECIES WERE FOUND AT THIS LEVEL OF ANALYSIS. IRONWOOD AND SAGUAROS WERE NOT FOUND.- 51ONIFIGANT VEGETATION ARE SHOWN ON SHEETS SR2 THRU SR3 TREES VELVET ME50U I TE FOOTHILL PALO VERDE BLUE PALO VERDE WH I TETHORN ACACIA CACTI FISHHOOK BARREL CACTUS SRI SUMMARY TOTAL TREES: 37 REMOVED SHRUBS: 33 REMOVED SRI 5F: 6606c1 SRI AG: 1.5 SRI DISTURBED 5F: 6606Q SRI DISTURBED AG: 1.5 S I GN I F I GANT VEGETAT I ON M I T I GAT I ON UNDER5TORY PLANTS CREOSOTE BUSH TRIANGLE -LEAF BURSAGE BUSH MUHLY WHITE THORN AGAG I A SUMMARY SYMBOL PLANT REMARKS TOTAL REMOVED TOTAL MITIGATION AG Acacia constricts TREE FORM 13 3q CIF Gercidium f loridum 2 6 GM Gercldium micro h Ilum Q 27 GP Geltis pallida 21 21 UNDER5TOR`( MITIGATION 560 5RI Plant Mitigation Summary (519nificant Vegetation) Tog Tyee. 5tatu5 51ze Name Botanical Name Mitigation Required Mitigation Provided* 23 Tree N 12" Foothill Paloverde Gercidium micro h Ilum 3 3 25 Shrub N IS' 1 Desert Hackberrq GeltiS eallida 1 1 57 Tree N 4" Foothill Paloverde Gercidium micro h Ilum 3 3 60 Tree N 16" Foothill Paloverde Gercidium micro h Ilum 3 3 64 Tree N 4" Foothill Paloverde Gercidium micro h Ilum 3 3 65 Shrub N 12' Desert Hackberry GeltiS pallida i I 68 Tree N 20" Foothill Paloverde Gercidium micro h Ilum 3 3 10 Shrub N 14' Desert Hackberrq GeltiS eallIda I I 73 Tree N 8" Blue Palo Verde Gercidium f loridum 3 3 14 Shrub N 10' Desert Hackberry Gelti5 pallida 1 1 75 Tree N 16" Me5 uite Pro5o i5 velutina 3 3 5q Tree N 12" Foothill Paloverde Gercidium micro h Ilum 3 3 202 Tree N 12" Nhitethorn acacia Acacia con5tricto 3 3 205 Tree N 4" Nhitethorn acacia Acacia con5tricta 5 3 205 Shrub N 12' Desert Hackberrq GeltiS eallida 206 Tree N 8" Blue Palo Verde Gercidium floridum 3 3 201 Shrub N 10' Desert Hackberr GeltiS eallida I I 20b Tree N 16" Nhitethorn acacia Acacia comtricta 3 3 20q Tree N b" Hhitethorn acacia Acacia con5tricta 3 3 210 Tree N 8" Mitethorn acacia Acacia con5tricta 3 3 211 Tree N 4" Hhitethorn acacia Acacia constricta 3 3 234 Shrub N 10' Desert Hackberr GeltiS eallida 1 1 235 Shrub N 10' Desert Hackberr GeltiS pallida I 231 Tree N 12" Hhitethorn acacia Acacia con5tricto 3 3 238 Tree N 8" Mitethorn acacia Acacia con5tricta 3 3 23q Tree N 16" Foothill Paloverde Gercidium micro h Ilum 3 3 240 Tree N 8" Nhitethorn acacia Acacia con5tricta 5 3 242 Shrub N 12' Desert Hackberr GeltiS eallida 1 1 244 Tree N 8" Nhitethorn acacia Acacia con5tricta 3 3 245 5hrub N 12' Desert Hackberr Gelti5 eallida I I 246 Tree N 8" Hhitethorn acacia Acacia con5tricta 3 3 24-1 Shrub N 4' Desert Hackberrq Gelti5 pallida 1 1 24& Shrub N 10' Desert Hackberry Gelti5 eallida I I 24q Shrub N 6 Desert Hackberrq Gelti5 eallicla 1 1 250 Shrub N 10' Desert Hackberrq Gelti5 eallicla 1 1 251 Shrub N 10' 1 Desert Hackberrq Gelti5 eallida 1 1 252 Tree N 20" 1 Me5 uite Pro5o 15 velutina 3 3 253 Shrub N 12' Desert Hackberry Gelti5 pallida 1 1 212 Tree N 20" Foothill Paloverde Gercidium micro h llum 3 3 2-74 Tree N 8" Mitethorn acacia Acacia con5tricta 3 3 215 5hrub N 12' Desert Hackborry Gelti5 eallida 1 1 216 Shrub N 12' Desert Hackberr Gelti5 eallida 2T1 Shrub N 5' De5ert Hackberr Gelti5 eallida 21q Shrub N 6 De5ert Hackberr Gelti5 eallida 1 1 2&0 Tree N 4" Foothill Paloverde Gercidium micro h Ilum 3 3 2&1 Shrub N 10' Desert Hackberr Gelti5 eallida 1 1 2&2 Shrub N &' De5ert Hackberr Gelti5 pallida 1 1 2&3 Shrub N V De5ert Hackberr4 Gelti5 eallida 1 1 255 Tree N 12" Mitethorn acacia Acacia constricta 3 3 Total 101 101 *NOTE: 5EE LAND56APE PLAN FOR MITIGATION PLANT MATERIAL PROVIDED. TABLE KEY N NON -VIABLE T TRAN5PLANT ON 51TE P PRE5ERVE IN PLACE R REMOVE FROM 51TE PROJE LOCAT 20 21 29 28 o/ CATA W STAR s1 ( &I I �i i •I 29 28 32 33 LOCATION MAP M SCALE 3" = 1 mile A PORTION OF THE SW 1 /4 OF SECTION 29, T-11—S, R-14—E, G&SRM, ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA TABULATIONS TOTAL SITE AREA TOTAL UNDISTURBED NATURAL OPEN SPACE PROPOSED SCALE: I" = 40' CONTOUR INTERVAL = I' 5-15-2007 LEGEND 15 AG 0 AG PROJECT BOUNDARY AREA OF 516NIFIGANT VEGETATION AREAS OF 15% SLOPES 1,70,76 5F. SITE RESOURCE INVENTORY - RESOURCE AREA ACuar's Coffc-n Landscape Architects Redondo 85701 OV 12-07-01 N N OVATi Off COMMERCE CAMPUS UNITS 1-14 COMMON AREAS 'A'(DRAINAGElOPEN SPACE/BUFFERYARD) AND COMMON AREAS B'(STREET/PARKING) BEING A COMMERCIAL CENTER SITUATED IN THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 29, T-11—S, R-14—E, G&SRM, ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA SCALE 1" = 40' CONTOUR INTERVAL 1 FOOT W LLB W 75 45U) 0-) C..) z 0 Q `Q 0 z z W Z N E OUD g�(D o U E co ca w � w U Qv0 U. mti 0 wToo 000 00 12666 STEVE ACUNA JOB NO. 06088 ISSUE DATE SEPT 2007 REVISIONS Za DI [DRAWN]BY 5ECKS SHEET NO. 5Rl /17/_ / '7.1 A / — _-0 L/ rill lt,11 ":7_ Z C 'T T ov� s4 X7 W,� 2 2 A, . .... is s_ v R I I , w km low, v 1 C) sm-n,g p RDRI VILLA G f,�NL� wc XA. R 01 ­!s oys`. &t A A 0.0 mw MT, 0i. �v g-, _;l Vi�`: t z ss A, I P� FIV ­ng"'L -'ar mwqwn W2. u M �,4 wp 'vF 'TE I �"o 10 sl� M 'Np 'iss, k", ­,eg , Am, _ y wt I AP.,� vp 7' "AG ag sill 4 4 A g, gg_TL4 m NO- W_ J "NW, vilt axig -IT N, Z 16� A- V -g v ;'j � MR: _ 4.17. "A WTA 04, o z_ M 14 144 � -9 , Q R 1, 44m,e"', I-V 5 A� X� __E IKg'o 77 IP g i4ll.�E 14, j C! P 5, "r-s iz�, A4 q V. _Pi, MR 71�1 sA w �r i r 4 Sl ­­�_ —'s , - i -1 1?� �,r 1- 1. . � I — I-.:- - , 'F W �Qf�g �e 0 4, A Wk� �si st- "s, "k w IX -j "s MAO M s -si _M _6 W �0 �,2 k,� s RR Al g V A zz, 41 - Am -44 010 "R, 1Y R7, 5", w3j" -2 w 0" R �� MOO,., 09 0 y s", g ukt 4- _5 ­40 sl� I,T 055 -,s,, "'s A91 Mv� R 1— . , Is A X- s :ey- s, sss� Y, N lk ftko v ? I'M _4c I N 101, f,%e A, U�, RX K, wx W_ Af 02 7_1-1� 2, al AT. � 44 w 4, I I - w is`� 6 ;P 'k , M� `- 4 f Yll MOT "M ­- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3k; 'g kk -'st- T, W7 4 4 N -0; w 44 4, Pf V m is, g, �,Q N 5 F®RIFF 521 _"3 iz 2. Vic Aa 5 3� '4"rA_ , W—A, �s _T_ A z7� A 0 se § 6 Z' t M "TE NCA 71:54,'IN��r,_!_Mffl V,7�,� 2__ 01 NO Al 000� -25 _u V AMPUS Tl' -0-," C IER L I - eft, M —14 UNITS 1 'A'(DRAINAGE/OPEN SPACE/BUFFERYARD) AND COMMON AREAS COMMON AREAS 8'(STREET/PARKING) 017 a a st BEING A COMMERCIAL CENTER SITU ATED IN THE SW 1/4 OF AAq, "-i b _5 ilt-l"I'm I , , —, "Ir '' � i'' 4�1 -, il m— 1, , �i MM SEC71ON 29, T-11—S, R-14—E, G&SRM, ORO VALLEY, PIMA 0� I _­" - � - " f � I, _,_� �g; V-'-' �V_i , 'ItAM M­ COUNTY, ARIZONA SCALE 1 40' i� 'yp C' MMERCELOO N Cur"'MERCE LO"u"P 0 u ILE- IST^S R �!v CONTOUR INTERVAL 1 FOOT t" p, g X LA, r4jr; LA. zz UA 10P 777', E cuo) ui E cu u ca LQ_ E w QD Lb L__ LU u) C) co u 00 C) 04 lq� LL 0 , M ce) CD ui * CD cp C:, Lo 12666 STEVE ACUNA A A JOB NO. 060&& ISSUE DATE 5EPT 200-7 REVISIONS DRAWN BY SA 3 CHECKED by 5A HE ET N C, wn A �1'j /;,7 / , , " ', ­_­­ , �� GENERAL NOTES: 1. GROSS AREA OF COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT IS 15.23 ACRES. -NET BUILDING -AREA. OF DEVELOPMENT IS 165,000 S.F... o SET CONCR TE o NAIL TA Rr%t i O `Y'iSTC,;.. '2. THE ISTING ZONING IS RANCHO VISTOSO PAD, CAMPUS PARK INDUSTRIAL CPI 4O RLS 2 39 WALL.�W n v�t.rit�viirivuvViz, n ♦ St' • - t�•rr,+ +.-.r->+ +ran ® FI 74,69C} S F r.nevvf,v t,IV v ^� h/ • • "10 =, 7H� tV`t9ni;ViLf,VV �, 11 INDUSTRIAL: 79,180 S.F. �ti�t.,�iP Pf,v � ,�r�° ,� s��o i(•. u ; �,c� �; ^-ryHASE 4., � rS NUMBER ofRESIDENTIAL 3 N R LOTS: 0 A-., >Ar l• • 7� �., RiC t r�"i �Pv n+t�.� V. .4-A- �, • d + n v. t " - ; i. u , NUMBER OF COMMERCIAL UNITS: 14 �A� Q �` N 5'1 53 &VA �> i,,, �. . AV t - . tY.7. r W � •,,.. - N83°52 33�W ° 32 01 ` r';,u C�'I 4. APPROXIMATE AREA OF NON--RES DEN'TI AL USES IS AS FOLLOWS: "c4 �'�`, � o • 356.83 COMMON AREA A': DRAINAGE/OPEN SPACE/BUFFERYARD=1 14,563 SF (2, 63 RLS J�5 .� _ _ AC: , a LS 29273 �' i 31 ' i ' " -- -- _•., ,Ou • p ?�+, COMMON AREA B : STREETS/PARKING=330,620. SF (7.59 AC) 15933 0• . .� p .� •s �' 5. , 'EXTERI OR ELEVATIONS WILL BE SUBMITTED FOR EACH BUILDING PRI OR - TO 2 2� �fl----� '� 3 „ ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS BY THE TOWN ENGINEER- AND/OR �2 �� , S60481 E 87, , iA,�� a Ana nnrn 47 V1V.,,.VL"V1v1Ve=V �. BUILDING OFE'I CI,AL. � �•® 69'O� Z��" 2 "N J;%> 6.. PARKING CALCULATIONS: 1 �: N2f•06'10"E 'n REQUIRED OFFICE C1 /254 S.F. X 74,690 S.F. -= 299 SPACES 12 9.3 50' U7T REQUIRED INDUSTRIAL -75 PER EMPLOYEE, 48 X :75 186 SPACES • TOTAL REQUIRED 48 SPACES + II VtvJVCitJIYlLIiJ TOTAL PROVIDED -=- 485 SPACES �• r,,+ MOBILITY ' IMPAI RED REQUIRED = 9 SPACES MOBILITY IMPAIRED ''PROVIDED = 13 SPACES (2 VAN ACCESSIBLE SPACES) BICYCLE PARKING REQUI RED= - 26. SPACES cr BICYCLE PARKING PROVIDED= 28 SPACES (3 CLASS ' I SPACES), r�.. r �'' 7. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (CPI): cs y N�� �� ? cs' MAXIMUM BUILDING HEI GH`1 == 36 FEET � o vi o ov. • ,G �c,� -c� �, 241.35 3 FN GLO STONE 1920 20 21 i N CORNER 30 29 •. `' �k>� 29 28 SECTION 29 y�.. Jj 1 LLJ J SETBACKS. FRONT YARD = 25 FEET .,� SIDE YARD _ -20 FEET OR COMMON WALL A;0. v% �, ,�� N89.57'37"E REAR YARD = 30 FEET cp MINIMUM 'DISTANCE BETWEEN BUILDINGS = 10 FEET. w ��' �• 5 LA DSCAPING REQUIREMENT (15% OF NET AREA} 0.15 X 15.23 = 2.29' ACRES °G •��� I co 999752 SF •� <G `.. 4 OD LANDSCAPING PROVIDED = 4.41 ACRES 192,100 ' SF c4 LANDSCAPED COURTYARD REQUIREMENT 2% OF NET AREA).02 X 15.23= • N 0.31-ACRES OR 13;503 SF. LANDSCAPED COURTYARD PROVIDED = :38 ACRES OR 16,645 SF. .� 8 8: THE BASIS OF' BEARING: THE . CENTERLINE OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD �� • �1v o/ AS RECORDED IN RANCHO- VISTOSO BOULEVARD RI GHT­OF-WAY 6 DEDICATION DOCKET 7868 PAGE 1456, ACCORDING -TO FOUND- MONUMENTS p� • .1� s SHOWN HERb-N BETWEEN VISTOSO COMMERCE .LOOP AND VISTOSO VILLAGE 2 DRIVE, SAID BEARING BEING S 20 52 33 E. 63�10VpOp/ QG' 2 9. THE BASIS- OF ELEVATION . FOR THIS PROJECT IS THE FOUND 3" ADOT AC IN ' • 3 NORTH CL MEDIAN IN BULLNOSE, ORACLE HIGHWAY AND RANCHO VISTOSO po BOULEVARD STAMPED 1989 LEV. 2841.44". Ls>��Q-,cam - 11 + , ^ DETENTION! R ENTION ps® SITE BENCHMARK -- FOUND 2 BCSM ON CENTERLINE OF STOSO COMMERCE Rr%1 *nw 'vI:��I SO 4, 12 N LOOP APPROXIMATELY 20901± NORTH EASTERLY OF RANCHO, VISTOSO kYE;:'tiBr%RF,^:�G % LS c'w C,, `L� q,(co�n-) -r-�a� 2•' �, s "' D "� III """'" BOULEVARD. ELEV. 2861.14 . E33K. 561 1'11 P PG. 5� 15933 P a + nv v-u •' .�'I� CA S�wE'f . N1o�N McAtr "iTAM L.� t s933 AT 'tbp - P,�,v C�'I C 33 1 06 DEVELOPER WILL CON VEN AN T TO HOLD TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, I TS ��' p�'� • 4-r-�wsem1rr 1 M-rw_ f zwl o V is l3wn I SUCCESSORS AND -ASSIGNS, HARMLESS IN THE EVENT OF FLOODING. 11. DRAINAGE WILL NOT BE ALTERED DISTURBED OR OBSTRUCTED WITHOUT THE cs` �-' • viv'��`.vt�v�vivi v I3te�rG, Z,�,a t, = Z40 . FNQ GLO STONE �" .._. L ;?"` "y ` PROJECT OVERVIEW S CORNER APPROVAL OF THE ORO VALLEYTOWN COUNCIL. o• 12. 'DRAINAGE FAC:I LI TI ES -SHALL BE- CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO APPROVED 15933 1" .` 100' SECTION 29 I PLANS PRIOR. T THE ISSUANCE OF ANY PERMITS FROM THE TOWN ` ENGINEER- AND/ BUILDING OFFICIAL. GENERAL NOTES CONTINUED: c .13. 'A PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION WILL. BE FORMED TO' ACCEPT 22. ANY -WASTEWATER DISCHARGED INTO THE PUBLIC SANITARY SEWERAGE SYSTEM 33. ANY LIGHTS TO ILLUMINATE PARKING SPACES AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTENANCE CONTROL SAFETY -AND 'LIABILITY OF SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE INDUSTRIAL WASTE ORDINANCE (PIMA DRIVES SHALL BE DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH � PRIVATE DRAINAGEWAYS, PRIVATE §EWERS, DRAINAGE EASEMENTS AND COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 1991.-140, AS AMENDED). ALL APPLICABLE OVZCR STANDARDS AND SHALL BE COMMON- AREAS. FULLY SHIELDED 'DOWNWARD LIGHTS. LIGHTING IN THE 23.- THE WATER ,DISTRICT FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT IS THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY REAR OF THE INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS ADJACENT TO 14. ACCESS ACROSS FLOOD PRONE AREAS TO BUILDING SITES WILL BE WATER U TI LI TY. � THE PROJECT WILL BE SERVED BY AN EXISTING 8" MAIN., -THE LOADING ZONES BE LIMITED TO NINE FEET (9') APPROVED BY THE TOWN ENGINEER AND SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF IN HEIGHT, PER THE OVZCR AND AS A THE _DEVELOPER. 24. ON-SLTE SANITARY SEWERS, EXCEPT PUBLIC SEWERS WITHIN PUBLIC SEWER NEIGHBORHOOD MITIGATION TACTIC. 1;i. THE DESIGN VEHICLE FOR THIS- PROJECT IS SU-30 WITH A DESIGN SPEED EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS -OF -WAY, WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OF .25 MPH. P,A.A,L. SPEED:. 15 MPH OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON' A PRIVATE BASIS. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO BOUNDARY CURVE DATA 1 �i. MATERIAL WITHIN THE SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLES SHALL BE PLACED SO REVIEW -AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA. COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT AS NOT TO INTERFERE -WITH A VISIBILITY PLANE DESCRIBED BY TWO DEPARTMENT AT THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL OF PLUMBING OR BUILDING PLANS. HORIZONTAL LINES LOCATED 30 INCHES AND 72 INCHES ABOVE FINISHED GRADE OF THE ROADWAY SURFACE. 25. ALL RI PRAP MATERIAL IN THE BASINS AND CHANNELS SHALL BE NATIVE STONES ' SIMILAR TO THAT FOUND ON THE SITE. CURVE .'RADIUS ARC LENGTH DELTA-AN-GLE..__ TANGENT C1 50.00' 81.81' 93'45'07" C2 25.00 39.27' 90000'00" 25.00' C3 1425.00'1 54.07' 02'10'26" 27.04' 11. APPROVED IMPROVEMENT PLANS AND APPROVED ASSURANCES WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS. OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES AND OR 26. ANY RELOCATION, MODIFICATION, ETC., / RE UI RED BY THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL BE AT NCB PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTSQ SHEET INDEX . 18. THE PROPERTY OWNER, HIS SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS, AGREE TO, 1) KEEP - ASH EXPENSE TO THE PUBLIC. e ALL REQUIRED LAN SCAPED AREAS MAINTAINED IN A WEED FREE FREE CONDI ON, 2 REPLACE ANY DEAD PLANT MATERIALS WI THt N 90 27, A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY SHEET 1 COVER & COMPOSITE MAP DAYS AND, MAI TAIN THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IN PROPER WORKING WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS SHEET 2�-3 PLAN SHEETS ORDER. PROJECT. SHEET4-6 DETAIL SHEETSGOVAD . SHEET 7 LOT ANNOTATION 19. THE OWNER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALLOCATING 1 % OF THE COST OF 9A THE REQUI RED . OFF -SITE PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER LINE WILL BE DESIGNED AND THIS ( �►Twu I PROJECT SrA R I :30 29' �o=�t00 2928 31 32 BENCHMARK 32 33 4 LOCATION MAP SCALE 3" 1 mile A PORTION OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION. 29., T-11--S, R-14-E, G&SRM, ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA LEGEND ® FOUND v" BCSM STAMPED ' AS NOTED O FOUND ✓" REBAR TAGGED 'RLS 25405' SET M" REBAR TAGGED 'RLS 27739' OR AS NOTED C3 CURVE NUMBER - -- SEE CURVE DATA TABLE 3 UNIT NUMBER - KEYNOTE' SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE -- - SECTION LINE. F' TIE DOWN LINE -...--...-- EXISTING 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN LIMITS -°--- - PAAL/ROAD CENTERLINE - _ _ _ .._... - _ EASEMENT EXISTING SIDEWALK PROPOSED SIDEWALK (� PROPOSED ACCESS RAMP PROPOSED CROSSWALK PROPOSED. TEXTURED PAVEMENT : PROPOSED STOP SIGN 3 NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS -- PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT o PROPOSED STORM DRAIN 0--8"S NEW MANHOLE AND SEWER LINE EXISTING MANHOLE AND SEWER LINE - 8"W NEW 8" VYATER W EXISTING WATER OS-2 OFFSITE CONCENTRATION POINT Q CONCENIIJATION. POINT PRIMARY BUILDING ENTRY ' BENCHMARK BCS BUILDING CONNECTION SERVICE BOW BOTTOM OF WALL CENTER LINE EP EDGE OF PAVEMENT E FLOW LINE ..-FFE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION FPE FINISHED PAD ELEVATION FS FIRE SERVICE GB GRADE BREAK HP NIGH_ POINT LP LOW POINT . TB TOP OF BANK TC TOP OF CURB TOW TOP OF WALL WS WATER SERVICE ALL PRIVATE PROJECTS. TO PROVIDE FUNDING FOR PUBLIC ,ART. ' CONSTRUCTED TO PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT OWNER 20.- ALL BUILDINGS SHALL -BE EQUIPPED WITH AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM. STANDARDS. OV 1-2. 07-01 INNOVATION COMMERCE CAMPUS LLCs 29. THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE 0 EXISTING AND. 500 PROPOSED WASTEWATER -FIXTURE DEVELOPMENT PLAN PRELIMINARY. PLAT 21. FIRE HYDRANTS CONNECTED T0- AN APPROVED. WATER SUPPLY OF 1500 -GPM � ATTN. ROGER FORD - >�ri- �v.7.. L� OR , FI RE PROTECTION SHALL BE INSTALLED AND I N SERVICE PRIOR TO UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E}(1 } 'I N PIMA. COUNTY CODE 16oa N KOLB ROAD, SUITE 118 FOR 13 20 045(E). TUCSON AZ 85715 COMBUSTI BLE . MAERI AL DELI VERY TO THE SI TE. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION OFFICE. TRAILERS ARE CONSIDERED COMBUSTIBLE -MATERIAL. • (520) 886�--1226 INNOVATION.- COMMERCE CAMPUS. 30. APPROVED FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS SHALL BE INSTALLED AND IN _HEREBY CERTIFY THAT SERVICECE * PRIOR TO COMBUSTI BLE MATERIAL DELI VERY TO THE Si TE: ��� �1f y c`� 42751 ICATF • 4 UNITS 1-14 Ar"% - SSTH ONP OF R *AN h __ 24D$ 31. THE , q VALLEY THE ORO VALLEY MAYOR *AND COUNCIL ALL STRUCTURES UNDER CONSTRUCTION SHALL. BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED FLED WI TH AN DEVELOPER LOU08 �, WRIX r COMMON AREAS 'A'(DRAI NAGE 'OPEN ' SPACE BUFFERYARD AND ,�, -APPROVED OV1201--01 APPROVED ADDRESS. Fcnj>a/rs� ACORN ASSOCIATES 'ARCHITECTURE rc COMMON AREAS B (STREET/PARKING} o 800 E. Wetmore Road, Suite 110 Tucson, AZ 85719 DEVELOPMENT/PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR iNNOVATION COMMERCE CAMPUS. 32, THE PROPERTY IS WITHIN THE ORACLE ROAD SCENIC CORRIDOR OVERLAY ATTN: KIM ACORN 4400 E BROADWAY BLVD, SUITE 505 , BEING- A COMMERCIAL CENTER SITUATED IN THE (520) 292--2300 . -(520) 292-1290 tax DISTRICT TUCSON. AZ 85711 SW 1 /4 OF SECTION. 29, T-�-11--S, R-14-E, www.psomt�s.com �h DATED THIS _ _ DAY OFF ? _2008 ORSCOD AND C } SHALL ABIDE BY ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS, {520} 881�-0731 G&SRM, ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA PSO MAS JOB 06131-01-23 S,\06\131\01\MC,R\DESIGN\OEV\RVOIWOI.OWG Sheet 1 Omar Zovwo, Thu, i0 Jon 2008, 1136am Lost Saved By. Otavoiu DATE: NOVEMBER 2007 SCALE; 1" = 100' SHEET q i OF 7 • *1910 11" ZYMM I JUTI m byA f2 • r, Ll 0 lk "M IW OL W91911T, I X, I S loollinniff WAX IT, Ft m S. 28' F_ 14' % 14' A.C. 6" VERTICAL CURB PER PC/COT SD-209 1 % _ y; _ TYPE 2 4" ABC VAR _1 Sz I COMPACTED -� I F SUBGRADE 8" WATER a IJOINT TRENCH FOR FIRE HYDRANT, 51� DRY UTILITIES MIN. 6', MAX 10' MIN LOCATION.VARfES FROM EGDE OF SEE PLANS FO $" SEWER STRIP PAVEMENT PER PC/COT LOCATIONS . SD-500, SEE PLANS FOR TYP. 28' P.A.A.L. AT 1 % SUPER ELEVATED LOCATIONS - PUBLI C STREETS NTS :. 37' .. r 18.5' 18.5' C 16' ' 16' 2" 2% A.C, 2% 6" VERTICAL CURB ' PER PC COT SD-209 d- 4 ABC I I TYPE 2 �- z COMPAC TED 8" WATER ARIES coo 2 SUBGRADE l I FIRE HYDRANT MIN. 6, MAX 10 . FROM SEE PLANS `FOR EGDE OF STRIP LOCATIONS JOINT TRENCH FOR PAVEMENT PER STD DRY UTILITIES DTL 500, SEE PLANS 8" SEWER LOCATION VARIES FOR LOCATIONS' CROWN ENTRANCE 5' , 3' 1 17' PARKING 58' 24' P.A.A.L. 12' 12' PER PC/COT STD DTL 2 17* MIN . ( 27o_ WRW a 1 ABC ,a 17' PARKING 12.5' . 5' MIN -� 5_ w I I COMPACTED 6" VI a.. W I I SUBGRADE PER 8" WATER >' JOINT TRENCH fOR TYPE 5 DRY UTILITIES MIN LOCATION VARIES SEE PLANS FOR $„ . LOCATIONS TYP. 24' P.A.A.L WITH PARKING 5' SIDEWALK, PER PC/COT SD-200 (TYP. SEE PLANS FOR LOCATIONS CAL CURB 'COT SD-209 PUBLIC STREETS NTS R/W WEIR 12'f 5' 7' jIN �g �l _ l- V ---�--___---..�__.�.�.�----_ -� 1 5.) � V EXISTING 2 - 60"x38" RCPA'S x 95 LF CAD 0.5� ......._ ... TO REMAIN I N) i DUMPED ROCK INV= ,._ _(T..._ ........_ RIP -RAP W/ 43.0 ± Qlw(PRE)=99cfs INV=42.5 FILTER FABRIC- D5, 6", T=12" .CUT X EXIST PIPE Qiw(POST)=66cfs WEIR TO EXISTING CULVERT E NTS PUBLIC STREETS NTS 20 80' R/W R/W C.A.'A' VISTOSO COMMERCE LOOP FPE= i EXISTING HEADWALL 55.5 TO BE REMOVED FILL .AND COMPACT TO 95% DENSITY EXI S - _ _-._...._ .- _ _. _ - ._.. _ _ _ - r_ - _ - - INV= (EXISTING 3-53"x34" RCPA'S x 87 LF taD 0.5% {TO REMAIN I 49,6. ._ ... _ .....,..._.._..._.. - _ _ _ _ _ - -- A CONNECT NEW Q,w(PRE)=83cfs NEW SD MH 5 NEW SD MH 2_36" HDPE'S Q,w(POtT)=83cfs RIM=55.4 RIM=55.4 4 LF 0 0.5% INV(NE)=50.4 INV(NE) :50.3 INV--50.07 I N V(SE)=50.1 I N V(SE)=50.0 PROPOSED STORMDRAI N TO EXISTING F - BARRICADE F NTS PER PCTOT SD 105 TYP s BASIN B 100 YR. WSEL=2847.73 13, � rr,tAtL � ; BASIN 'A'• HAND PLACED Iq- 100 YR. WSEL-2861.31 RIP -RAP -W FILTER FAB LC D5e6 , T=12 *.TIE BARRICADE RAILING INTO SCREEN WALL BASIN "A" DETENTION NTS BLDG 6 10't 10'f BLDG 8 VARIES VARIES FE=56.0 �_ - FFE=56.3 _[2 -, MIN 2% LONGITUDINAL FIRE HYDRANT, 30" HDPE SLOPE MIN. 6. MAX 10' FROM EGDE OF OPEN AREA BETWEEN BLDG 6 AND BLDG 8 STRIP PAVEMENT PER PC/COT BUILDINGS TO BE CONSTRUCTED OUT OF., NTS SD-500, SEE MASONRY OR STEEL MATERIALS PLANS FOR LOCATIONS S 0 A S 800 E. Wetmore Road, Suite 110 Tucson, AZ 85719 (520) 292-2300 (520) 292-1290 fax www.psomos.com - PSOMAS JOB 06131-01-23 131\01\ENGR\DESIGN\DEV\RVO1DP04.DWG Sheet 4 Omar Zavolo Thu, 10 Jan 2008, 11:04am Lost Saved By.. Ozavalo ROCK RIP -RAP O. ..; • !SEE PLANS FOR OPTI ON 1 LOCATION s•*- •''`Qlod= % t •� ' y' OPTION CHANNEL SECTION TO EXISTING PAD NTS 35'f HANDICAP PARKING SPACES Wf STRIPING PER ADA STANDARDS f VERTICAL CURB TO b / i�' ♦ / / NC. HEADER PER PC/COT SD--212 �` HANDICAP SIGN PER A.D.A. STDS. iON ..... 0000, N-I 3' TRANSITION FROM WHEEL STOP CONCRETE HEADER TO CURBING PER VERTICAL CURB PER �,.► D.S. 3--05.2.3.C.2 PC/COT SD-212 � 3' TRANSITION FROM / O L-r . W1114. 1 VR VY%IV SPACES 23' MIN.- FOR STANDARD HANDICAP PARKING MOBI U TY IMPAIRED PARKING SPACE H WEIR TO DRIVE LANE NTS V 5' 3' I3t ..�5 , w v •► a y iAlo5' SIDEWALK / BI VARIES HAND PLACED ROCK RIP -RAP SLOPE 43.79 TO 44.59 PROTECTION D 6 PAD TO BASIN T=12" SEE PLANS SEC110N 5' SIDEWALK I NTS FOR LOCATION L NTS 122' 5' 3' 17' PARKING 24' P.A.A.L. 20' PARKING 20' PARKING 24' P.A.A.L. -- 12 _ 1.2 _ 12 q 12' " 1% MIN 2" T.r+• nv\.i�JJaOi_G ntuYUllrfir rrtnnllvta **J lANUAKU HANUICAP PARKING NTS (8' MIN. STANDARD ADA PARKING SPACE (9' MIN. STANDARD PARKING SPACE WITH 5' WITH 8' ACCESS AISLE) ACCESS AI SLE) 17' PARKING I2.5', 5' VARIES A.C. VARIES 0% MIN) 0% MIN) _2_%----,-�--2% _ 2% 1 MIN l l 6" VERTICAL CURB COMPACTED CONC. VALLEY GUTTER PER PC/COT SD--209 SUBGRADE PER PC/COT STD DTL 208 TYPE 2 5' SIDEWALK, PER PC/COT SD-200 (TYP. SEE PLANS FOR r� TYP_ 24' P_A_A_i_-_ WIT14 PAR N(% LOCATIONS PUBLIC STREETS NTS R 12' TO EDGE OF PAVEMENT PER PLAN 2 till■sr\�■�\Ni■r\iRiR\ir\\N\M � srt�■■1lM�ItlNt�■ 4999-L6 VANE AS MANUF. BY NEENAH COMPANY OR APPROVED !■\i!!iillliilliliill!■■1�.. ■lllllii■ill ■r•t�����srslnrlat��r�n�s�a�a■ � 1trMNiisA=tit /lli!!\!■ill■ii!■■li■\\\l r�r■!\l!i/\■! EQUAL 2.PER PLAN, PER PLAN 0; (�A•re.••r.rrr...R.rrr•a■a•■■■.•.a■r.a.a.rrrpwaMrr-rrr.u•■a■rr.rrr■.■u■u■.■■■■rrrssr■w•w.u■e■cQ�i NEW '. 30" OR 36" HDPE / INV= PER PLAN . LOCATION OF PIPE VARIES SEE PLANS SECT-1 ON 1 FOR LOCATIONS e1 TRANSVERSE GRATE 6" VERTICAL CURB PER PC/COT SD--209 TYPE 2 MODIFIED PC/COT SD--309 TYPE 4 CATCH BASIN NTS SECTION 2 OV 12--07--01 DEVELOPMENT PLAN / PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR INNOVATION COMMERCE CAMPUS UNITS 1-14 MON AREAS 'A' (DRAINAGE/OPEN SPACE/BUFFERYARD) AND COMMON AREAS B (STREETS/PARKI NG) I BEING A COMMERCIAL CENTER SITUATED IN THE SW 1 /4 OF -SECTION 29, T-11-S, R-14-E, G&SRM, ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA DATE: NOVEMBER 2007 SCALE: NTS SHEET 4 OF 7 oDP 3vY #0o!5w 4C �r EX. -52.Q+ SLOPE P.U.E. PAD NTS l=.. VORTECHS SYSTEMS INSTALLED IN A BYPASS CONFIGURATION REQUIRE AN UPSTREAM DIVERSION STRUCTURE THAT SHALL BE DETAILED BY THE CONSULTING ENGINEER WITF ELEVATION AND WEIR WIDTF DATA PROVIDED BY CONTECI STORMWATER SOLUTIONS. A .E . INLET VARIES, SEE NOTES 8 INLET PIPE MUST BE A CC INLET TO INTRODUCE TANGENTIALLY TO THE SWIRL CHAMBER. Eli E R/W P.U.E. TEP AND US I 5'± DRIVE LANE IWEST EASEMENT I :54.8+ II ----- I PLAN VIEW B - B RS 20' 8' VARIES 3' 0arga I I FFE 6 5Z� 1.5 CHANNEL�SECTION NTS VORTECHS SYSTEMS INSTALLED IV-orIN A BYPASS CONFIGURATION REQUIRE AN UPSTREAM DIVERSION STRUCTURE THAT SHALL BE DETAILED BY THE SEALANT CONSULTING ENGINEER WITH ELEVATION AND WEIR WIDTH EXTRUDED BUNA N DATA PROVIDED BY CONTECH SEAL STORMWATER SOLUTIONS. �: .r P • . ► �••i P ,, r; 1 : ORIRCE ALUMINUM. SWIRL CHAMBER 1'-to• t'-sue, a'-o~ •1 A IR MINIMUM W COMPACTED GRAVEL SECTION A - A I NOTES: 1. STORMWATERTREATMENT SYSTEM (SWTS)$HALLHAVE 7. SWTS SHALL HAVE NOINTERNAL COMPONENTS THAT OsaMUCiMAINTENANCE PEAKTREATMENTCAPACtTY.9.6CFS ACCESS SEDIMENT STORAGM 335 CU YD 8. INLET PIPE MUST BE PERPENDICULAR TO THE STRUCTURE SEDIMENT CHAMBER DLA: T MIN 9. PIPE ORIENTATION MAY VARY: SEE SITE PLAN FOR SIZE ARID LOCATION 2. SWrS $HALL BE CONTAINED IN ONE RECTANGULAR STRUCTURE 10.PURCHASER SHATLNOT BERESPONSLBLE FOR ASSEMBLY OF UNIT 3. SWTS REMOVAL EFFICIENCY SMALL BE DOCUMENTED BASED ON PARTICLE M . 11. MANHOLE FRAMES AND PERFORATED COVERS SUPPLIED WITH SYSTEM, NOT 4. SWISSHALL RETAIN FLOATABLESANDTRAPPED SEDIMENTUPTOAND INSTALLED INCLUDING PEAK TREATMENT CAPACITY 12, PURCHASER TO PREPARE EXCAVATION AND PROVIDE ORANE FOR OFF-LOADING AND S. SWTS; INVERTS IN AND OUT ARE TYPICALLY AT THE SASE ELEVATION SETTING AT TIME OF DELIVERY 6. SWTS SHALL NOT SE COMPROMISW BY EFFECT'S OF TREAM TAILWATER 13, VORTECMS SYSTEMS SY C.ONTECH STORMWATERSOLUTION% PORTUW D, OR (W0 7; SaVGOROUGH; ME (8M907-W76: LINTHICUM, MD (888) 740.9318. PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES This CARD file is fix the purpose of specifying stormwater treatment equipment to be furnished by OONTECH Stormwoter Solutions and may only be transferred to other documents exactly as provided by CONTECH Stormwater Solutions. Title block information, axehsdtnp the CONTECH Stormwater Solutions logo and the Vortechs Stormwater Treatment System dostgnotion and patent number, may be deleted If neeessory. Revisions to any port of this CADD file without prior coordination with CONTECH Stormwater Solutions shod be considered unauthorized use of proprietary information. STANDARD DETAIL STORMWATER TREATMENT•SYSTE StOWMATER" VORTECHS" MODEL 5000 SOLLMONS.a U.S. PATENT No. 5,769,416 ter.00rit DATE: SCALE: NOT TO SCALE FILH NAME' DRAWN: ICHECIKE11. IST FLUSH UNIT NTS OUTLET MAY WW, VARY, !1 SEE NOTE 9 419 NLET VARIES, SEE NOTES 8 do 9. INLET PIPE MUST BE A CORNER SEALANT BAFFLE WAIL FLOW CONTROL WALL INLET TO INTRODUCE FLO TANGENTIALLY TO THE CHAMBER. PLAN VIEW B - CONCRETE REINFORCED RIM ELEVATIONS TO FOR HS20 LOAOIN MATCH FINISHED •.r; ��::' 'y :4e'•i .t: �• `.•j'.s.'' s�;f -«• •.i{ RISERS BY OTHERS TOP AND S%fl£S ; FB SEALED To LT B VAULT _T $ ' WEIR WEIR BUTYL RUBBER 7 .0* AND - SEALANT % ICE ' PLATES ORIFICE T 7. TYP TYP TYP _jJ MINIMUM 6. OOMPACTED GRA SECTION A - A NOTES: 1. STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM (SWTS) SHALL HAVE' ` 7. SWTS SHALL HAVE NO WTERNAL COMPONENTS THAT OBSTRUCT MAINTENANCE PEAK TREATMENT CAPACITY' 14 M ACCESS SEDIMENT STORAGE' 4.8 CU YO S. INLET PIPE MUST BE PERPENDICULAR TO THE STRUCTURE SEDIMENT CHAMBER DW 9'MIN 9, PIPE ORJENTA71ON MAY VARY; SEE SITE PLAN FOR SIZE AND LOCATION 2, SWTS SHALL BE CONTAINED IN ONE RECTANGULAR STRUCTURE 10. PURCHASER SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ASSEMBLY OF UNIT 3. SWTS REMOVAL EFFICIENCY SHALL BE DOCUMENTED BASED ON PARTICLE SIZE 11, MMKOLE FRAMES AND PERFORATED COVERS SUPPLIED WITH SYSTEM, NOT 4. SWTS $HALL RETAIN FLOATABLES AND TRAPPED SEDIMENT UP TO AND INSTALLED INCLUDING PEAK TREATMENT CAPACITY 12. PURCHASER TO PREPARE EXCAVATION AND PROVIDE CRANE FOR OFFLOADING AND 6. SWTS INVERTS IN AND OUT ARE TYPICALLY AT THE SAME ELEVATION SETTINGATTIMEOFOELIVERY 6. SWTS SHALL NOT BE COMPROMISED BY EFFECTS OF DOWNSTREAM TAILWATER 13. VORTECt1S SYSTEMS BY OONTEC" STORMWATER SOLUTIONS; PORTLAND, OR (SW:5CARBOROUGM,ME{877)90788T6:uNTHICUMMD(866)740:33 is PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES This CADD Me Ls for the purpose of apeclfying stormwater treatment equipment to be furnished by CONTECH Stormwoter Solutions and may only be r vt T w Solutions. Titt block Lnf mottos excluding the T mw transferred to other documents exactly ors p o dad by CONTECH Storm oter Soiu e a ng CONTECH Stor star Solutons logo and tho Vorteehe Stormwater Treatment System designation and patent number, may be deleted If necossory. Revisions to any port of this CADD So w th t Sot coordination with OONTECH $ ormwo er Solutions shall be considered unauthorized use of oroorlotory information. � STANDARD DETAIL CONTECrou". STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM SfORNNVATER VORTECHSO MODEL 9000 SOLUDONSr. tr.s. PATEIi(No.s,7saxts COfi10dwoif "t6r.00110 I DATE: SCALE: FILE NAME: DRAWN: OHECK£D: IST FWSN UNIT HAND PLACED ROCK RIP.. -RAP 2EX. PAD SLOPE PROTECTION GRADE Dom; 6", T=12" SEE PLANS FOR LOCATION �O 136" HDPE PIPE 0 0.0 L:2� VARIES P S 0 M A S I ALTERNATE 1 800 E. Wetmore Read, Suite 110 Tucson; AZ 85719 (520) 292-2300 , (520) 292-1290 fax www.psomos.com PSOMAS JOB 06131-01-23 S.\0ti\131\01\ENGR\DESIGN\DEV\RV01DPO5.DWG Sheet 5 Omar Zovolo Thu, 10 Jan 2008, 11:04om Last Soved By: Ozavola a eke VARIES 2 EX. PAD GRADE 1 RETAINING WALL (BY ,SEPARATE PERMIT) HEIGHT=VARIES 1--36" HDPE PIPE 0.03% ALTERNATE 2 NTS NTS 150' R/W RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD Q1w(PRE)=9cfs Q,w(POST) =10cfs EXI STI N A -- 24" RCP x 167 LF C� 5.5_„ I EXISTING ' ._ .�. �....�. ......_ .. �.. I NV=35.82 INV=45 PROPOSED STORMDRAIN TO EXISTING NTS r ,7 r-,a'+ \ / WOOD GATE t tl (SEE ARCM PLANS) if NOTE rA D ENCLOSURE GATES MUST INCLUDE ;a D a A . '° ° 0 THE ABILITY TO SECURE THE >A GATES IN THE OPEN POSITION �Q°i} DURING SERVICE AND WHEN CLOSED. RECOMMEND GATES TO OPEN 180 DEGREES WHERE ° t: 9 : D D. POSSIBLE OR MINIMUM 12 FEET. D D O• O '•. �0 _ O O• .' D rnn's S (QTY--4, 1 IN. DIA,x6 IN. LONG D; A D P GALVANIZED PIPE FLUSH a 11.67 P . ' A .. .A D „ ' 9 . 5 C NC '; D O : .. w/CONCRETE). ' D : CAB A p O 1.0 Q P D : p. ° • A P, A a•. t .� 8 CMU BLOCK WALL, A ° 0 9 . _ 6' HIGH (SEE ARCH AD.•. p• p .�. , b•' O A'. A-•D.D1 •, PLANS) a • ® '�• '• ° ° p A' p • D POST BARRICADES, TYPE A PER PC/COT STD. 106 4' 0. C. 13.4' DUMPSTER DETAIL SINGLE ENCLOSURE NTS REFER TO DEV STD • i i FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BICYCLE L . NTS It leBICYCLE PARKIN EEN NEW SD MH10 RIM=50.0 INV NW) =45.9 INV SW)=45.6 11 LF 241$ BIKE POSITION PIPE RACK 7 1 il, .1 ✓ �® s e tt> i CLEAR AREA 3Qaa -fr .BI CYCLE ClJkSS 2_ --NTS • V 12-- 07--• 01 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR EEDES113IAN QROSSWALK BOMANITE EXPOSED AGGREGATE CONC. COLOR 1 PEDESTRI AN CROSSWALK HNr�� �01111111 MR wool a N MAFFIC CALMING MEMO NTS AGGREGATE CONC. - COLOR 1 BOMANITE EXPOSED AGGREGATE CONC. COLOR 2 CARPORT STRUCTURAL - POST - LOCATE WITHIN 3' OVERHANG SPACE 17 wV10mlye -- PER PLANS T.O. CMU Bowl ;iXeNwilz 3 17 `-CONC. CURB OR WHEELSTOP COVERED PARKI NG evhlTwclr� P CTJ lf%(Nf) ELEVATI ON X-SYNTHETIC STUCCO WROUGHT IRON ZFINISH (E.I.F.S.) REF. SPECS. CMU SPECS. SEE PLANS 6' SEE P MAX. 40 MAX. PLAN SCREEN WALL mg, F., 1 604 wm, CMU --"F-105.33 p T.O. CMU 1 —01.33 # FIN. FLR,. --,,F-100 I SYNTHETIC STUCCO FINISH (E.I.F.S.) NTS NTS PLAN �a MONUMENT SIGN N TS ,-CMU REF. NO 3 TYP SPEC. —T.O. 0AUL v 102.67" -CMU NO. 1, TYP., REF. SP'E('S. -CMU NO. 2, TYP., REF. SPECS. U = 83.75" R = 50' NTS OV 12-07-01 DEVELOPMENT PLAN / PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR i / �/: ►:,, yA.Alnt in �vt.;lv.:v ` O Alr-tl,i i�r1�>i inns-\ 7 �t IA^r` Llnnl/,� in A AI/�� in �t�.,r-n;•n , rl�A.:t`_ , � ,t-•1-rnCln iir,l v..fiv v t.: t tnnn � ► 'r^ '� � � 7 v Ivl._i\7C1L.v1\rl I t-N L i •: L "_ t vim. t,lrri,t t+-�nC)t innr-, Iv�_I\7rll":vl\f�vvv '} 1 1 A ^ r_ 'r I f-i ei 1. t , i r 9• h � !1 A A � A h A COMMON AREA 'A' \ `t•, IVI �.Cr � i,\7. 4-4- 9 ' Q�'.� L, , Clr1...,t,_ , r A r1 A I�nL.! Vt,i `� �• S�" �'�A r\ ,►r�1 4L �G_L�i iniC 4<0 N N 4512 53" W , a 83'52 33 I., r ^ ., a Q,C o,`y iN 56 83 32. 1 01 I v I Y ~ - COMMON AREA 'A' nv I / q> S 06*22'33" E �`° •`1� COMMON' AREA 'B' 95.66 "I L=104.64 - -V , N 06'07'27" E �� R=185.00' " �y�• N 83'3' 27 81.82' . � 1 S 83'S ' S 39'S9'38" E�� �-32'24'28" S 60 4811 E 219.0 2 33 E h 1.87 � 4.87 COMMON AREA B 0 A r ; , �� I -P.13, �\ w �f-=7.06 s / p• 1 . R=4.50'89*51 .35" ,� 14cv \ 69 0? 27 E N 6 9�07117 E , �g N 100.00' 37.95' 63''�1 �Z 3 (00) � L g• _ 0 N 26'06'10" E -7.07 2° S 26006#10" W , L=39.27 `',4 3'34 R=4 50' n 16.76' cn 93.50 A---89 54 58 R=25.00 ,- --.. W o L1�• 90'00'00 6' 32, 12�� 9 6. fi6 83 52` ---,�-- s � �. � 1'V I U �_ U M L=188.99 213 48f L=67.17 . N 06 07 27 E � = � R=399.50 , R=665.00' " 32 68 L=2 46 �t \ A=-05 4713 A=•27'O6'16" 1 L=40.65' R=25.50' �� +. � N 11629'02" E R_399.50' L�=05 31 1 .�,� �`g, 48.42 •� O �g A--05 49 46 " L=31 36' 6 'o • 5 COMMON AREA 'B' R=44.50' 0 2 A=-40'22'18"0- V.- �\ N 44'26'38" EVR • �`�� / ? a t�` s _ g 52.88' 03 �U, a'k, • o��. d'� �. `� 0�1 ''��i. COMMON AREA 'B' oo. 7. �� +* y4 0 oa'• J, wo0 2 ro N,N1' � •QQ ��• 7? COMMON AREA 'B' 9 �/ 2- �� COMMON AREA .,B, 'I 1 0 • � \\ tom, •1�� ro CP. :.A N � � off• � ��, ��y oQ �'' CCp0 �, o � to `� 63�� 6 � . o�• o .y® �6� • � \ I�,-,1v�.fly vt.:iv.:\.i �'. o 2•y0 IvL_Ivf1L,vi"\0 flvvv �. ' o $ -S � 1<- ; 9 h A Q 0 61) 7 yQ ° moo• COMMON AREA 'B' . �, L,t\. v, IVI.�C, t \.7 �� .t°1 cd► s is 1 " . 50' S\69.07'27" W 25.00 6'� �� `sp ��' g �j :0� ` •oo N 25'40'2 �'' P 63�122.1 �' P 6'4811 E �J -' P (' '%p�N� t {1,1N1 t.nl U - 54.00 I V .. V L.1V I Y t V l._ t.! nv OV 12--07--01 o. ,•'' �. Ile\ ;e;,;-- \ DEVELOPMENT PLAN :/---PRELIMINARY PLAT �OMMON AREA 'A' �Q :.- FOR ' A \ DETENTION _ • " �/ �/ n INNOVATION CERCE�,CAMPUS- L=54.07 �l-.59.92' �' P.� • 4 tow , R=1425.00 UNITSI. 1-14 -02.10'26" �4275; you. COMMON AREAS 'A' DRAINAGE OMEN SPACE BUFFERYARD AND ERIN E. COMMON AREAS B (STREETS/PARKING) Ph S 0LOUDERMILK - • � o \ � T �' � �f Oi /ID/ soo E. Wetmore Road, Suite. 1 F BEING A COMMERCIAL CENTER SITUATED IN THE Tucson, AZ 85719 / IGN£ �. (520) 29.2-2300 (520) 292-1290 fax L=81.81 O \�_ www.psomas.com ' � � �; �� „.._ ; SW 1 4 OF SECTION 29, T-11--S, R--E,-E, p R=50.00 r.t nr^ G&SRM, ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA PSOMA5 J08 46131-01-23=93'45'07" v i u d v i v i v C- S:\06\131\01\ENGR\DESIGN\DEV\RV01DP07.DWG Sheet 5 Omar Zovalo Thu, 10 'Jan 200 , 11:04om Lost Saved y.. Ozavala DATE: NOVEMBER 2007 SCALE: 1" = 50' SHEET OF ! I APPROVALS I, CLERK OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS APPROVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ON THE DAY OF . 20 CLERK, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY DATE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DATE TOWN ENGINEER DATE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR DATE WATER UTILITY DIRECTOR DATE CERTIFICATION OF WATER ADEQUACY A CERTIFICATION OF ASSURED WATER SUPPLY HAS BEEN RECEIVED FROM THE DIRECTOR OF WATER RESOURCES. BY: WATER UTILITY DIRECTOR DATE ASSURANCES ASSURANCE IN THE FORM OF FROM AS RECORDED IN DOCKET PAGE HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO GUARANTEE DRAINAGE AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS GIASL SDEIWERM WATER) IN) T'HNSD SUBD V SIONROVEMENTS (ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE,I. B Y: MAYOR, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY DATE ASSURANCES IN THE FORM OF , FROM _�, IN THE AMOUNT OF _ HAVE BEEN PROVIDED TO GUARANTEE THE RESEEDING OF THIS SUBDIVISION IN THE EVENT THE PROJECT IS ABANDONED. NO FINAL INSPECTION FOR ANY LOT WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION SHALL BE APPROVED UNTIL A BUILDING CODES OFFICIAL HAS VERIFIED THAT CONSTRUCTION ON THE LOT IS COMPLETE AND SIDEWALKS HAVE BEEN INSTALLED, PROPERTY LINE TO PROPERTY LINE. DEDICATION (WE) THE UNDERSIGNED, HEREBY WARRANT THAT I AM (WE ARE) ALL AND, THE ONLY PARTY (PARTIES) HAVING ANY RECORD TITLE INTEREST IN THE LAND SHOWN ON THIS PLAT AND I (WE) CONSENT TO THE SUBDIVISION OF SAID LAND IN THE MANNER SHOWN HEREON. (WE) HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE PUBLIC, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY AND PIMA COUNTY ALL RIGHTS -OF -WAY SHOWN HEREON, INCLUDING ALL STREETS, EASEMENTS (DRAINAGEWAYS, ALLEYS). UTILITY EASEMENTS AS SHOWN HEREON ARE DEDICATED FOR THE PURPOSE OF INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF UTILITIES AND SEWERS. EXCLUSIVE EASEMENTS FOR TOWN USES AS SHOWN HEREON ARE HEREBY DEDICATED TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY. I (WE) THE UNDERSIGNED, MY (OUR) SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, DO HEREBY SAVE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, THEIR EMPLOYEES, OFFICERS AND AGENTS HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES RELATED TO THE USE OF SAID LAND NOW AND IN THE FUTURE BY REASON OF FLOODING, FLOWAGE, EROSION OR DAMAGE CAUSED BY WATER, WHETHER SURFACE, FLOOD OR RAINFALL. IT IS FURTHER UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED THAT NATURAL DRAINAGE SHALL NOT BE ALTERED, DISTURBED OR OBSTRUCTED WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL. PRIVATE DRAINAGEWAYS AND COMMON AREAS, AS SHOWN HEREON, ARE RESERVED FOR THE PRIVATE USE AND CONVENIENCE OF ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION, THEIR GUESTS AND INVITEES, AND (EXCEPT FOR DRAINAGEWAYS), FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND SEWERS. TITLE TO THE LAND OF ALL PRIVATE DRAINAGEWAYS AND COMMON AREAS SHALL BE VESTED IN AN ASSOCIATION OF INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY OWNERS AS ESTABLISHED BY COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS IN DOCKET BOOK N__ PAGE ___ IN THE OFFICE OF THE PIMA COUNTY RECORDER. EACH AND EVERY PROPERTY OWNER WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHALL BE A MEMBER OF THE ASSOCIATION, WHICH WILL ACCEPT ALL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CONTROL, MAINTENANCE, SAFETY AND LIABILITY OF THE PRIVATE DRAINAGEWAYS AND COMMON AREAS WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION, AS SHOWN HEREON. BY. PARCEL 223-02-014G INNOVATION COMMERCE CAMPUS, LLC, AN ARIZONA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 1600 N. KOLB ROAD SUITE 118 TUCSON, ARIZONA 85715-4934 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF ARIZONA ss COUNTY OF PIMA THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME ON THIS OF 20 , BY OF ON BEHALF OF THE CORPORATION AND NOT OTHERWISE. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: GENERAL NOTES 1. THE GROSS AREA OF THE SUBDIVISION IS 15.23 ACRES. 2. THE TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS IS 14. 3. COMMON AREA 'A' (DRAINNAGE/OPEN SPACE/ BUFFERYARD) = 14,563 S.F. (2.63 AC.) COMMON AREA 'B' (STREETS/PARKING) = 330,620 S.F. (7.59 AC.) 4. TOTAL MILES OF NEW PUBLIC STREETS IS 0.0 MILES. 5. MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT IS 36'. 6. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (CPI): SETBACKS: FRONT YARD = 25 FEET SIDE YARD = 20 FEET OR COMMON WALL REAR YARD = 30 FEET MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN BUILDINGS = 10 FEET. LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENT (15% OF NET AREA) 0.15 X 15.23 = 2.29 ACRES / 99,752 S.F. LANDSCAPING PROVIDED = 4.41 ACRES / 192,100 S.F. LANDSCAPED COURTYARD REQUIREMENT (2% OF NET AREA) .02 X 15.23= 0.31 ACRES OR 13,503 S.F. LANDSCAPED COURTYARD PROVIDED = .38 ACRES OR 16,645 S.F. THE MINIMUM S.F. FOR LOTS - NONE THE AVERAGE S.F. FOR OFFICE LOTS 1-10 = 12049.2 S.F. THE AVERAGE S.F. FOR INDUSTRIAL LOTS 11-14 = 24950.7 S.F. 7. PARKING CALCULATIONS: REQUIRED (OFFICE) (1 /250 S.F. X 74,690 S.F.) = 299 SPACES REQUIRED (INDUSTRIAL) .75 PER EMPLOYEE, 248 X .75 = 186 SPACES TOTAL REQUIRED = 485 SPACES TOTAL PROVIDED = 485 SPACES MOBILITY IMPAIRED REQUIRED = 9 SPACES MOBILITY IMPAIRED PROVIDED = 13 SPACES (2 VAN ACCESSIBLE SPACES) BICYCLE PARKING REQUIRED= 26 SPACES BICYCLE PARKING PROVIDED= 28 SPACES (3 CLASS I SPACES) 8. EXISTING ZONING IS RANCHO VISTOSO PAD, CAMPUS PARK INDUSTRIAL (CPI). TOTAL OFFICE BUILDING ALLOWED: 74,690 S.F. TOTAL INDUSTRIAL BUILDING ALLOWED: 79,180 S.F. 9. NO FURTHER SUBDIVISION OF ANY LOT OR PARCEL SHOWN WILL BE DONE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL 10. BASIS OF BEARING: THE CENTERLINE OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD AS RECORDED IN RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION, DOCKET 7868, PG 1456, ACCORDING TO FOUND MONUMENTS SHOWN HEREIN BETWEEN VISTOSO COMMERCE LOOP AND VISTOSO VILLAGE DRIVE, SAID BEARING BEING: N 20'52'33" W. 11. THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL CERTIFY AS TO DAY THE FORM, LINE AND FUNCTION OF ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE ROADWAY'S AND DRAINAGE STRUCTURES BEFORE THE RELEASE OF ASSURANCES. NOTARY PUBLIC 12. THE 100 YEAR FLOOD LIMITS WILL BE CONTAINED WITHIN CONSTRUCTED DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. 13. THE PROPERTY OWNER, THIS SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNS OR A DESIGNATED PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION AGREES TO 1) KEEP ALL REQUIRED LANDSCAPED AREAS MAINTAINED IN A WEED FREE, TRASH FREE CONDITION, 2) REPLACE; ANY DEAD PLANT MATERIALS WITHIN 90 DAYS AND 3) MAIN -FAIN THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IN PROPER WORKING ORDER. 19 20 2021 3029 : 29 28 5L I' Cp1 > I I s � � I TH I S u23 I CATAUNA I PROJECT � I A RH "�` I 00 3029 C-1 -A _ 2928 3132 32133 LOCATION MAP SCALE 3" = 1 mile A PORTION OF THE SW 1 /4 OF SECTION 29, T-11-S, R-14-E, G&SRM, ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA LEGEND ® FOUND 2" BRASS CAP SURVEY MONUMENT STAMPED AS NOTED 0 FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED p SET 1 /2" REBAR TAGGED 'RLS 27739' OR AS NOTED • 1 /2" REBAR TAGGED 'RLS 27739' TO BE SET C1 CURVE NUMBER - SEE CURVE DATA TABLES S1 SIGHT VISIBILITY LINE NUMBER - SEE SHEET 5 P.O.A. PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION 3 LOT NUMBER - - - - - - - - EASEMENT LINE - - SECTION LINE -�'-T S.V.T. - SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY LINE - - - - TIE DOWN LINE LOT OR C.A. PROPERTY LINE CERTIFICATION OF SURVEY 14. THE ALLOWABLE BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE PER LOT IS: SHEET INDEX LOT 1: 7,469 S.F. LOT 8: 7,469 S.F. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE BOUNDARY SURVEY SHOWN ON THIS PLAT WAS RECORDING LOT 2: 7,469 S.F LOT 9: 7,469 S.F. SHEET 1 DEDICATION, NOTES & LOCATION MAP PERFORMED UNDER MY DIRECTION AND THAT ALL EXISTING AND/OR PROPOSED LOT 3: 7,469 S.F. LOT 10: 7,469 S.F. SHEET 2 BOUNDARY DRAWING / SHEET INDEX SURVEY MONUMENTS AND MARKERS SHOWN ARE CORRECTLY DESCRIBED. I STATE OF ARIZONA FEE LOT LOT 4: 5: 7,469 7,469 S.F. S.F. LOT LOT 11: 12: 19,795 S.F. 19,795 S.F. SHEET 3-4 PLAN SHEETS FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECTION. ss LOT 6: 7,469 S.F. LOT 13: 19,795 S.F. SHEET 5 SVT EASEMENT DETAILS COUNTY OF PIMA N0. LOT 7: 7,469 S.F. LOT 14: 19,795 S.F. icnr ERNEST GOMEZ, R.L.S. / 1111 �7`' 27739 ARIZONA REGISTRATION NO. 27739 , ERNE GOM EZ\ EXPIRES 3/31 /12 CERTIFICATION OF ENGINEERING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ENGINEERING WORK EFFORT, INCLUDING GEOMETRIC DESIGN AND DETERMINATION OF THE 100-YEAR FLOOD PRONE LIMITS AND EROSION HAZARD SETBACKS, ON THIS PLAT WAS REVIEWED AND SHOWN UNDER MY SUPERVISION. -� GERALD A. EDWARDS, P.E. ARIZONA REGISTRATION NO. 33790 P S 0 M A 800 E. Wetmore Road, Suite 110 Tucson, AZ 85719 (520) 292-2300 (520) 292-1290 fax www.psomas.com PSOMAS JOB 06131-01-25 \F ►CArF /P, 33790 o GERAW A. o EDWARDS E ai \�«/o/ S�6N EXPIRES THIS INSTRUMENT WAS FILED FOR RECORD AT THE REQUEST OF PSOMAS ON THIS DAY OF 20 AT m, IN BOOK OF MAPS AND PLATS AT PAGE THEREOF. F. ANN RODRIGUEZ PIMA COUNTY RECORDER DEPUTY FOR PIMA COUNTY RECORDER 15. MATERIAL WITHIN THE SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLES SHALL BE PLACED SO AS NOT TO INTERFERE WITH A VISIBILITY PLANE DESCRIBED BY TWO HORIZONATAL LINES LOCATED 30 INCHES AND 72 INCHES ABOVE FINISHED GRADE OF THE ROADWAY SURFACE. 16. ANY WASTEWATER DISCHARGED INTO THE PUBLIC SANITARY SEWERAGE SYSTEM SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE INDUSTRIAL WASTE ORDINANCE (PIMA COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 1991-140, AS AMENDED). 17. ON -SITE SANITARY SEWERS, EXCEPT PUBLIC SEWERS WITHIN PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS--OF-WAY, WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAIINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT AT THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL OF PLUMBING OR BUILDING PLANS. 18. ANY RELOCATION, MODIFICATION, ETC., OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES AND/OR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED BY THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL BE AT NO EXPENSE TO THE PUBLIC. 19. THIS PROPERTY IS WITHIN THE ORACLE ROAD SCENIC CORRIDOR OVERLAY DISTRICT (ORSCOD) AND SHALL ABIDE BY ALL APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS. 20. ALL GENERAL NOTES AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR OV12-07-01 DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PRIELIMINARY PLAT AND LANDSCAPE PLAN APPLY. T OV 12-07-01 A FINAL PLAT FOR INNOVATION COMMERCE CAMPUS LOTS 1-14 COMMON AREA A (DRAINAGE/OPEN SPACE/BUFFERYARD) AND COMMON AREA B (STREET/PARKING) BEING A COMMERCIAL CENTER SITUATED IN A PORTION OF SECTION 29, T-11-S, R-14-E, GILA & SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, CROSS REFERENCE ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA oV 1 2-07-01 DATE: MARCH 2O09 SCALE: N.A. SHEET OF 5 z � p� COMMC 0 y ON N J `cl A O s.. N(JI\��, O� O m LA RA��°CHO VI"I,alOSO IIEIGHBORHOOO PHASE, 3 8K.56 P112'>65 M&P Lp \v P P S 0 M A S 800 E. Wetmore Road, Suite 110 Tucson, AZ 85719 (520) 292-2300 (520) 292-1290 fax www.psomas.com PSOMAS JOB 06131-01-23 FND GLQ STONE NORTH #CORNER SECTION 29 I � X241.35' ^000 z N89'57'37'E c J z ILoo I � w N I Lj O � O z FND (31-STONE SOUTH CORNER SECTION 29 N SCALE: 1" = 100' SURVEY REFERENCES 1. GLO NOTES OFFICIALLY FILED 3/11 /1910 2. P.C.D.O.T. MONUMENT TIES 3. RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 2 PHASE 1, BK. 49 M&P PG. 22 4. RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 2 PHASE 2, BK. 50 M&P PG. 82 5. RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 2 PHASE 2, BK. 51 M&P PG. 64 6. RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD PHASE 3, BK. 56 M&P PG. 65 7. ASSESORS MAP NO. 223-02 (FORMERLY 203-01) 8. DOCKET 12703 AT PAGE 2540 9. DOCKET 11391 AT PAGE 2182 10. DOCKET 10617 AT PAGE 1897 11. DOCKET 12952 AT PAGE 7525 12. BK. 24 OF SURVEYS, PG. 54 13. PARTIAL COPY OF UNRECORDED BOUNDARY SURVEY BY W.L.B. CURVE TABLE CURVE RADIUS ARC LENGTH DELTA ANGLE CHORD LENGTH CHORD BEARING Cl 50.00' 81.81' 93'45'07" 72.99' N 69'55'38" W C2 25.00' 39.27' 90'00'00" 35.36' N 24607'27" E C3 1425.00' 54.07' 1 02*10'26* 54.07' 1 N 21'57'46" W EXPIRES 3/31 /12 ICA 33790 GERALD A. a EDWARDS AG 0 ai EXPIRES G/" % " OV 12-07-01 A FINAL PLAT FOR INNOVATION COMMERCE CAMPUS LOTS 1-14 COMMON AREA A (DRAINAGE/OPEN SPACE/BUFFERYARD) AND COMMON AREA B (STREET/PARKING) BEING A COMMERCIAL CENTER SITUATED IN A PORTION OF SECTION 29, T-11—S, R-14—E, GILA & SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, CROSS REFERENCE ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA OV 12-07-01 DATE: MARCH 2O09 SCALE: 1" = 100' SHEET 2 OF 5 I P tluuK rAUt g•53 2" 8�5E RLS 15 S� PMP CLASSIC OVERLOOK COURT. Zg�'3 Y M ° 6g'°'I � �Q • RO$� 125 ,�� '� • GE 1 10 Ilk ��SO �o Z G� �-� ��Ik �o -1\ / r'� "•✓ f =a s /, nS .SRYi�-rs r A y s SVT ESMT. SEE SHEET 5 v ` �crl cry r "� (TYP) 0 P S 0 M A S 800 E. Wetmore Road, Suite 110 Tucson, AZ 85719 (520) 292-2300 (520) 292-1290 fax www.psomas.com PSOMAS JOB 06131-01-23 LINE TABLE CURVE TABLE LINE BEARING DISTANCE L1 N 69'07'27" E 37.95' L2 N 39'59'38" W 4.87' L3 N 26*06'10" E 16.74' L8 N 75'00'00" E 7.84' L9 N 15*00'00" W 11.33' L10 N 75'00'00" E 10.21' L11 N 26*48'11" W 1.96' L12 N 26*06'10" E 56.91' L13 N 69'07'27" E 20.23' CURVE RADIUS ARC LENGTH DELTA ANGLE CHORD LENGTH CHORD BEARING C2 25.00' 39.27' 90000'00" 35.36' N 24'07'27" E C4 399.50' 40.51' 05'48'38" 40.50' N 66'06'07" E C5 25.50' 2.46' 05*32'16" 2.46' N 28*52'18" E C9 50.50' 58.26' 66'0548" 55.08' N 06'56'44" W C10 50.50' 38.68' 43'52'55" 37.74' N 61'56'06" W C11 24.50' 4.80' 11 *14'09" 4.80' N 63'30'23" E C15 1 665.00' 67.17' 05*47'13" 67.14' N 66*13'50" E C16 1 4.50' 7.06' 89*51135" 6.36' N 71'43'59" W C17 1 4.50' 7.07' 90*00,00" 6.36' N 18#11'49" E EXPIRES 3/31 /12 MORTAR PESTLE 6g , Op e. L • l COMMON AREA A SCALE: 1 " = 5' EXPIRES 61*39 " CROSS REFERENCE OV 12-07-01 N SCALE: 1" = 40' SEE DETAIL BELOW a M4.e' Ei C 2182 O K, 1 27 0 2 G. %v�b b-�5x. �b s _i11. 0 2 s �� � N'Z@ UCH_ I VIUL N 60.48'11" W 1.87' OV 12-07-01 A FINAL PLAT FOR INNOVATION COMMERCE CAMPUS LOTS 1-14 COMMON AREA A (DRAINAGE/OPEN SPACE/BUFFERYARD) AND COMMON AREA B (STREET/PARKING) BEING A COMMERCIAL CENTER SITUATED IN A PORTION OF SECTION 29, T-11-S, R-14-E, GILA & SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA DATE: MARCH 2O09 SCALE: 1" = 40' SHEET 3 of 5 BOOK PAGE \000N P\NPG65 ��g� /— 51.n4 \ <61�z N , N po \ UN SUB D I ID"ED K. 1081 7d I Gm 18017 CURVE TABLE CURVE RADIUS ARC LENGTH DELTA ANGLE CHORD LENGTH CHORD BEARING Cl 50.00' 81.81' 93'45'07" 72.99' N 69'5538" W C3 1425.00' 54.07' 02*10'26" 54.07' N 21'57'46" W C6 44.50' 31.36' 40*22'18" 30.71' N 46'59'20" W C7 NOT USED C8 NOT USED C12 24.50' 3.70' 08'3855" 3.69' N 73'26'55" E C13 25.00' 34.24' 78'2747" 31.62' N 23'57'55" E C14 25.00' 34.24 78-27'47" 31.62' N 77#34'18" W LINE TABLE LINE BEARING DISTANCE L4 N 25'40'24" E 22.16' L5 N 63*11'49" E 11.51' L6 N 63'11'49" E 14.99' L7 N 6311'49" E 17.51' L14 N 69'0727" E 21.32' FINAL PLAT FOR SCALE: 1 " = 40' OV 12-07-01 A '� G RNES v `0 v� = INNOVATION COMMERCE CAMPUS �+ o9TGOM -' j o LOTS 1-14 P S 0 M A S cNED� '6NED COMMON AREA A (DRAINAGE OPEN SPACE BUFFERYARD AND COMMON AREA B (STREET/PARKING) 800 E. Wetmore Road, Suite 110 Tucson, AZ 85719 EXPIRES 3/31/12 EXPIRES G/3i � I (520) 292-2300 (520) 292-1290 fax BEING A COMMERCIAL CENTER SITUATED IN A PORTION OF www.psomcs.com SECTION 29, T-11—S, R-14—E, GILA & SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, PSOMAS JOB 06131-01-23 CROSS REFERENCE ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA OV 12-07-01 DATE: MARCH 2O09 SCALE: 1" = 40' SHEET 4 OF 5 BOOK PAGE S.V.T. LINE TABLE SEE DETAI I \ SEE DETAIL 2 'A 7- \ z 0 G � Q0A P S 0 M 800 E. Wetmore Road, Suite 110 Tucson, AZ 85719 (520) 292-2300 (520) 292-1290 fax www.psomas.com PSOMAS JOB 06131-01-23 SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLES SCALE: N.T.S. LOT BOUNDARY-` ON N 21.05'33" w COMMON AREA B \Cl off 09 „ fig, Q 0.5203' N �4 41 LOT 7 0N 20.52'33" 25,E "E P CEP N 'o .50' � � 4'ArA o 8 SON N PRE E GOMM � � o. P OMMpN e°�N° DETAIL 4 / G DETAIL 2 Z p LANp Qoessiona j� �i " LOT BOUNDARY '�'�s� ��a ��� �catF '�' ,C �F l CA TF ti �� �`� gyo ry, w ��' "`' ."C G v • `' 27739 -� GERRAAL� DA. _ LOT 11 ��h �ti w ER N E ST EDWARD Dc ,y►�. GOM Z sjF 3r�G o •�����»EA�00 N 4445 43 E \A 6 EP SCALE: N.T.S. �•�� g ON 6 �Q EXPIRES 3/31 /12 EXPIRES Gi7Oi N 20 52 3» 3.57 GpMMO 44'45'43" E 1.58' DETAIL 1 DETAIL 3 CROSS REFERENCE OV 12-07-01 SCALE: 1 " = 40' LINE BEARING DISTANCE S1 N 20'52'33" W 10.00' S2 N 20'5233" W 10.00' S3 N 20'52'33" W 28.15' S4 N 63*11'49" E 12.10' S5 N 63*11'49" E 15.00' S6 N 63011'49" E 24.00' S7 N 2648'11" W 10.00' S8 N 26*48'11" W 28.00' S9 N 6311'49" E 24.00' S10 N 26*48'11" W 10.00' S11 N 26*48'11" W 10.00' S12 N 26*48'11" W 10.00' S13 N 62'20'27" W 21.5V S14 N 63*11'49" E 30.00' S15 N 81'37'54" E 31.62' S16 N 26*48'11" W 10.00, S17 N 63*11'49" E 24.00' S18 N 63'11'49" E 40.00' S19 N 63*11'49" E 24.00' S20 N 63*11'49" E 30.00' S21 N 44'45'43" E 31.62' S22 N 26*48'11" W 10.00' S23 N 26*48'11" W 10.00' S24 N 81'37'54" E 21.08' S25 N 44'45'43" E 21.08' S26 N 26*48'11" W 10.00' S27 N 63*11'49" E 24.00' S28 N 26*48'11" W 10.00' S29 N 81'37'54" E 31.62' S30 N 63*11'49" E 30.00' S31 N 26-48'11" W 10.00, S32 N 26*48'11" W 10.00' S33 N 69*48'19" E 24.16' S34 N 26*48'11" W 10.00' S35 N 26*48'11" W 28.36' S36 N 70'25'34" E 24.19' S37 N 2648'11" W 10.00' 338 N 26-48.11" W 10.00' S39 N 6311'49'* E 10.00, S40 N 26748'11" W 10.00, S41 N 63*1149" E 40.00' S42 N 44'45'43" E 21.08' S43 I N 81-37-54" E 21.08' S44 N 26*48'11" W 10.00' S45 N 63*11'49" E 24.00' S46 N 63'11'49" E 30.00' S47 N 44'4543" E 31.62' S48 N 26*48'11" W 10.00, S49 N 63'11'49" E 30.00' S50 N 08'34'08" E 48.37' S51 N 17'26'32" W 27.67' S52 N 63*11'49" E 10.00' S53 N 63*11'49" E 10.00' S54 N 81'37'54" E 31.62' S55 N 63011'49" E 30.00, S56 N 26*48'11" W 10.00, S57 N 63*11'49" E 24.00' S58 N 26*48'11" W 10.00' S59 N 6311'49" E 40.00' S60 N 44'45'43" E 21.08' S61 N 81'3754" E 21.08' S62 N 26*48'11" W 10.00' S63 N 63*11'49" E 24.00' S64 N 26048'11" W 10.00' S65 N 63*11'49" E 30.00' S66 N 44'45'43" E 31.62' S67 N 86'2343" E 19.04' S68 N 40'0022" E 19.05' S69 N 81'37'54" E 31.62' S70 N 6311'49" E 30.00' S71 N 26*48'11" W 10.00' S72 N 6311'49" E 24.00' S73 N 26*48'11" W 10.00' S74 N 63'11'49" E 30.00' S75 N 44'45'43" E 31.62' S76 N 62'20'27" W 21.51' S77 N 63*11'49" E 30.00' S78 N 63411'49" E 24.00' S79 N 63*11'49" E 30.00' S80 N 44'45'43" E 31.62' S81 N 26*48'11" W 10.00' S82 N 26*48'11" W 10.00' S83 N 81'37'54" E 31.62' S84 N 26*48*11" W 10.00' S85 N 22'59'21" W 7.52' S86 N 63*11'49" E 24.00' S87 N 14*1353" E 37.48' S88 N 53'22'06" W 27.95' S89 N 08'44'04" E 21.51' FINAL PLAT FOR OV 12-07-01 A INNOVATION COMMERCE CAMPUS LOTS 1-14 COMMON AREA A (DRAINAGE/OPEN SPACE/BUFFERYARD) AND COMMON AREA B (STREET/PARKING) BEING A COMMERCIAL CENTER SITUATED IN A PORTION OF SECTION 29, T-11-S, R-14-E, GILA & SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA DATE: MARCH 2O09 SCALE: 1" = 40' SHEET 5 OF 5 I Daum rAVL ARIZONA BOUNfDARY SURVEY ```1� ARIZONA BOUT4DARY SURVEY , •:`; MINIMUM STANDARDS �,.� MINIMUM STANDARDS '•:PL5..° 9. The following standards apply to establishing, replacing or se n j `*d tion to sufficient mathematical ties to the controlling; monuments boundary monuments: fro v e survey, which enable the survey to be retraced by another surveyor, Qf the surveyors drawing must also show, as. a minimum, the following A. if the monument is at either a Public Land Survey System section�or '�0 items: 1/a-section corner, refer to applicable state statutes relative tto monumenting those positions. I A. A basis of direction or bearings. B. ' All new monuments, including the surveyor's Arizona registration B. The surveyors Arizona RLS stamp, with signature and date. number thereon, shall provide a degree of permanency, consistent with that of adjacent terrain and physical features. C. The surveyor's statement that the survey was performed either by the surveyor or under the surveyor's direct supervision. C. Whenever and wherever practicable, new or replacement boundary monuments, and witness corner monuments set shall satisfy the D. A legend or table that identifies and explains all symbology and following minimum criteria: abbreviations used. 1. The body of the monument shall be of metal or other such durable E. A list of pertinent reference documents that were used as a basis for material. the survey. 2. The body of the monument shall be at least 16 inches in length. F. When setting a monument is unpractical, the recorded results -of - survey drawing shall detail the reason for not setting the monument 3. The body of the monument shall be at least rh inch in diameter. and show bearings and distances to the nearest corner, witness 4. The surveyor's Arizona registration number shall be affixed to corner(s) or reference marker(s). or clearly stamped into the body of the monument. G. A north arrow. 5. The monunnent shall be magnetically detectable. H. The scale of the drawing. 10. Where the point for a corner monument is such that, for all practical purposes, a permanent corner monument is not established, then at least one of the following two alternative monumentation procedures shall be used: A. Witness Corner Monument: Such a monument is used where the boundary corner position cannot be occupied. Such a monumented surveyed point is set on the surveyed boundary line, or a prolongation thereof, and it shall be stamped "WC". B. Reference Markers: Where a corner position is impractical to monument directly, or a witness corner cannot be set as described above, the surveyor shall cause to be set at least two Reference Markers. These are not set on the boundary lines and are to be identified as "RM". 12. The following criteria shall be adhered to when the surveyor includes any of the following as part of the results -of -survey drawing(s): A. Horizontal and/or vertical control data, when used shall be noted in detail. Where vertical data is referenced, the surveyor shall also include information about the controlling benchmark(s) and its (their) elevation(s). B. Curve data shall be stated, as a minimum, in terms of radius, central angle, and length of curve, and as otherwise specified by local ordinance. in all cases, the curve data must be shown for the line(s) affected. C. All non -tangent curve data shown must have sufficient additional information to allow them to be verified through mathematical analysis. 4 2005 APLS APLS 2005 5