Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOV120538VA ORO VALLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT °`10.`�,_ 11000 North La Canada Drive Oro Valley, AZ 85737 (520) 229-4905 Fax (520) 229-4979 "o-icwi Development Review Committee D.R.C. Date: Friday Dec. 9, 2005 Comment Submittal Date: Friday Dec. 9,2005 Project Number: OV 12-05-38 Project Title: Fido's Friendly Dog CLub Location: Rancho Vistoso and Del Webb Comments: 1) Request a copy of proposed rules and regulations for park (hours of operation, maintenance responsibility, signage etc.) 2) Consideration for stray golf balls from course and potential for related accidents 3) Well signed for hours of operation, user restrictions, parking prohibitions and emergency contact information for emergencies, theft or vandalism calls for service Sgt. Amy Sloane Crime (Prevention Specia(ist r s Oro Valley, AZ August 23, 2006 01//a-0s-38' Town of Oro Valley Planning and Zoning Department 11000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley, AZ 85755 To Whom It May Concern: Sun City/ Vi�toso Community Association, Inc. 1565 E. Rancho Vistoso Blvd. Oro Valley, AZ 85755 T: (520) 825-3711 F: (520) 825-0432 www.suncity-vistoso.com On August 22, 2006, the Sun City Vistoso Community Association, Inc. Board of Directors approved the Fido's Friends plan for construction of a Dog Park on SCVCAI Common Area, which is located off of Del Webb Boulevard. The Board of Directors has authorized the club to submit the appropriate paperwork to obtain a grading permit. Please let me know if you need additional information for this club to proceed with their mission to construct a Dog Park in the SCVCAI common area. Sincerely, Scott Devereaux, CMCA, AMS General Manager cc: Board of Directors Fido's Friends it ?? e'm -e&h it o� v ""(DUNDED 191a Planning and Zoning Division 11000 N. La Canada Drive, Oro Valley AZ 85737 Phone: (520) 229-4800 Fax: (520) 742-1022 Web Site Address: www.townoforovalley.com REQUEST FOR PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PARCEL NUMBER: NOV 1 � 20 TYPE OF REQUEST: Ape katz, / �as, 19Ak eedrA ddo M&A APPLICANT NAME/FIRM: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.( fld) •Jl 4%/D# f _FAX NO.: EMAIL: PROPERTY OWNER: SIGNATURE:�U/ ��� �&2 DATE: PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE DATE REQUESTED: (Office use only) ❑ SUBMITTALS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT LEAST TEN (10) WORKING DAYS IN ADVANCE OF THE DESIRED PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE DATE. ❑ SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS "ALL PLANS MUST BE FOLDED PER PIMA COUNTY FOLD." o TWENTY (20) COPIES (24X36) OF THE PROJECT CONCEPT PLAN, WITH LOCATION MAP. o TWO (2) COPIES OF SITE RESOURCE INVENTORY. SUN CITY VISTOSO COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION INC.. BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING NOV 1 2005 BOARD MEETING MINUTES October 25. 2005 • 9:00 AM • Auditorium A) Call to Order Meeting of the Board of Directors of SUN CITY VISTOSO COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC. (hereafter "Association"), an Arizona corporation, was held in the Social Hall, 1495 E. Rancho Vistoso Blvd. on Tuesday, October 25 at 9:02 a.m. 1) Attendance Present at the meeting- were: Board Members: Jane Arndorfer, Jerry Natt, Jim Ostheimer (acting chair), Gay Russell, John Sellers and Don Sikkink; General Manager, Scott Devereaux; Director of Operations, Colleen Heinemann and Robin Coulter, Recording Secretary. Absent: Bob Rubino, Chair. B) President's Remarks C) Minutes 1) Approval of September 27, 2005 Board Meeting Minutes Motion to approve the minutes of September 27, 2005 with the understanding the sentence bolded in I1 will be completed by Sikkink, seconded by Arndorfer. Motion unanimously approved. D) Town of Oro Valley - K.C. Carter. The Council voted no on the utility tax. Pertaining to Vestar, a ruling accepted the appeals courts earlier ruling which would have allowed it to go before the Town for a vote, March 14. The issue was challenged and is again back in court. Efforts continue on obtaining a light at Innovation and Rancho Vistoso. Candidates so far for office are Mayor Loomis, Conny Culver, and Don Cox. The Pusch View Bridge should be completed by the middle of November. Information will be forthcoming on the General Plan. The Town has requested the money approved in the recent bond passed for the Marana Town Site is transferred to acquiring the Steam Pump Ranch parcel. E) Financial Report 1) Auditor's Report — Year Ending June 30, 2005 Marianne DeVries, of DeVries CPAs of Arizona, P.C. reported the auditor's position was that the financial statements are in agreement with accounting practices. She presented an overview of the financial statements listed in the audit. Motion to approve the audit report for the year ending June 30, 2005 by Natt, seconded by Sellers. Motion unanimously approved. 2) September Financial Report — Patrick Boulton reported heavier investing in short-term CDs, over $2 million. Accounts receivable indicated 16 home owners have not paid their dues. The work in progress of almost $2 million is primarily the irrigation project. Fund balances total $13,868,000. The average yield acquired is about 3 %z%. Cash and investments total $3,489,000. Revenues have exceeded budget by a little over $15,000, primarily attributed to the success in the Cafe. Expenses are lower than budgeted. Asset reserve purchases in September included tread mills, Sports Complex restroom work and the golf course project. Asset Reserve balance, $712,000; Capital Fund balance, $174,000; Contingency Fund balance, $112,000. Rounds played during the first three months are down about 13% from the previous year. Golf passes sold are 298, 295 budgeted. The Finance -Budget meeting is November 16, 9 AM, Social Hall/Hopi. Motion to approve the September financial report by Arndorfer, seconded by Russell. Motion unanimously approved. F) Committee Reports 1) Architectural Review — No report. .- - 2) Community AssistAl L George Holthus reports can collectUIL are continuing as usual with a group of volunteers delivering cans to the recycler. The Loan Room has a modest remodeling project revising shelving and storage racks which is about half completed. The Loan Room currently does not have car seats meeting requirements for children 40 lb. and under due to the changing of standards and regulations. Residents should encourage company with children in this weight range to bring a seat with them. The Tucson Arizona Boys Chorus was a good concert, but attendance was only enough to break even. The Pancake Breakfast will be Saturday, November 5. 3) Consumer Referral - Bill Saunders reports 135 referrals have been made, the group is open five days a week. One vendor has been added and three removed for inability to prove insurance. A presentation of the Arizona State Registrar of Contractors will be held November 15, 2 PM, Auditorium. 4) Finance -Budget — Michael Kaye reports the accounting firm gave a preliminary report on the audit. The review of the operating procedures of the Association has been completed. A sub -committee has been established to address the golf program and will be working with a sub -committee of the Golf Advisory Committee to develop a recommendation on the golf program/fee structure. The next meeting will be Wednesday, November 16, 9 AM, Social Hall/Hopi. This meeting will be a review of the investment practices and a discussion of the budgeting process. 5) Gift Shop — No report. 6) Golf Advisory — John Sellers reports a sub -committee will be working on a golf program/fee structure recommendation. The Golf Beautification Program continues to receive monies; currently 28% of its goal of $27,000 has been reached. The Lady Niners made over $2,000 at the Courtyard Sale towards the Golf Beautifications Project. 7) Government Affairs — Dean Strandskov reports a meeting on the General Plan will be held. A meeting with council members, Talk of the Town, will also be held on the last Tuesday of the month, 2 PM, Social Hall/Kachina Lounge. 8) Marketing — Jim Ostheimer reports assignments have been dividing up among committee members. The committee needs a chairman. 9) Neighborhood Pride — Report will be given later in the agenda. 10) Nominating — Bill Abel reports the committee has been working since August. The following names are submitted for election: Hank Jepsen, Jonathan Leonard, Bill McCarthy, Jim Ostheimer, Al Percy, Bill Saunders, Sharyn Rafieyan, George Williams. These are all qualified residents of Sun City Vistoso. 11) Posse — Jack Nelmark membership is at 646. The committee assisted in traffic control for the Courtyard Sale. The Posse was featured in an article by the Northwest section of the Arizona Star indicating the cost efficiency of the committee. 12) Properties — Gay Russell reports information is being gathered on the roof in the cart barn area and for a possible expansion. The chemical storage is being reviewed. The annual inspection will be conducted next month. 13) Space Analysis Task Force — Scott Devereaux reports the recommendation from the committee will be forthcoming. The report will be on the agenda for the next Study Session. 14) TIPSTER Editorial — Don Sikkink reported they are meeting and working on the editing of the Tipster. G) Consent Agenda — No items. H) General Manager's Report - Major cleaning and painting was done to the Cafe. Formost is basically done with its work on the golf course, on time and under budget. The course opened Monday, October 24. Over -seeding has been completed. The irrigation system is working well. On October 17 Sun City Vistoso was the first entity in Oro Valley to begin using reclaimed water. The Town has reported about 1,000 gallons a minute can be pumped. Readings have indicated 800-900 gallons per minute, but the amount is currently sufficient. The Sports Complex ladies' locker room has been opened; the men's locker room should open in two weeks. j - I) Unfinished Business 1) Clay Club Kilns — Relocation Status Report, Cost Estimates and Direction. Discussion on this item will be postponed pending the report of the Craft Complex Space Analysis Committee. J) New Business 1) Excess Revenues 2004-2005 — Recommendation of whereto allocate surplus. Motion to approve the staff recommendation pertaining to the allocation of the excess in the Contingency Fund as indicated in the October 21, 2005 memo from Controller Patrick Boulton by Russell, seconded by Natt. Motion unanimously approved. 2) Chalk Creek Wash — Review of quote for design to resolve erosion behind driving range. Motion to proceed with the report on the Chalk Creek wash as indicated in the September 30, 2005 WLB letter by Arndorfer, seconded by Natt. Motion unanimously approved. 3) Entrance Signs — Review quotes of landscape design concepts for entrance sign areas. The feeling of the Board was this project was not a priority. It may be something for the Foundation to consider. 4) Committee Approvals: a) Neighborhood Pride (1) Revised Mission Statement (2) Approval of Chair (3) Approval of Members (4) Approval of Liaison Motion to approve the Neighborhood Pride Committee revised Mission Statement, chair, members, and Board Liaison by Natt, seconded by Sellers. Motion unanimously approved. b) Election — New member Motion to add Fran Prutzanni to the Election Committee by Sellers, seconded by Natt. Motion unanimously approved. 5) Bocce Court Renovations Motion to approve the Bocce Club's requested additional $675, totaling $3,175, as per the October 14, 2005 memo from Ray Bruns for the improvements to the Bocce Courts by Arndorfer, seconded by Sellers. Motion unanimously approved. 6) Membership Dues Collection Motion for the Board to ask staff to prepare an analysis of a split dues system which should be forwarded to the Budget -Finance Committee for study and a recommendation to the Board by Sikkink, seconded by Natt. Motion unanimously approved. 7) Pet Partners Club — Bylaw Change Motion to approve the proposed name change from Pet Partners to Fido's Friends by Sikkink, seconded by Arndorfer. Motion unanimously approved. 8) Proposed Dog Park - a) CC&R Amendment Motion for the Board to place the following CC&R amendment on the spring 2006 ballot to Amend Article IV, Section 2e (i), page 18 which now reads "No animals shall be permitted upon Common Areas except as controlled on a leash or similar device held by the owner" to read, "No animals shall be permitted upon Common Areas except as controlled on a leash or similar device by the A owner or his or ner agent or in a fenced area designateu as an `Off -Leash Dog Park"' allowing changes to the language to encompass prohibiting animals on the golf course and allowing an animal to be off -leash in a dog park by Sikkink, seconded by Natt. Motion unanimously approved. (suggested wording: Animals may be permitted on approved Common Areas when controlled on a leash or similar device or within the confines of a dog park.) b) Possible location Motion to give conditional approval to Fido's Friends proposed location for a dog park as presented at the October 14, 2005 Study Session with full approval for this location to occur when there is a successful amendment of the CC&R's allowing a park, when all permits required by Oro Valley have been received and when a final site plan is given to the General Manager by Sikkink, seconded by Sellers. Motion unanimously approved. K) Call to Audience — None. L) Adjournment at 11:10 a.m. Submitted by: Robin Coulter Recording Secretary Approved by: Gay Russ 1, Secretary TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning and Zoning • Building Safety 11000 N. La Canada Drive, Oro Valley, AZ 85737 • (520) 229-4800 • Fax (520) 742-1022 Oro Valley Public Library 1305 W. Naranja Drive, Oro Valley, AZ 85737 • (520) 229-5300 ° Fax (520) 229-5319 Parks and Recreation 680 W. Calle Concordia, Oro Valley, AZ 85737 • (520) 229-5050 • Fax (520) 797-2202 May 3, 2006 Scott Devereaux Sun City Community Association 1565 E. Rancho Vistoso Blvd. Oro Valley, Arizona 85755 Re: OV12-05-38, Fido's Friends Dog Park; west side of Del Webb Road, adjacent to Holes 2, 3 and 6 of Sun City Vistoso Golf Course, Parcel #223-01-002N. Dear Mr. Devereaux, We are pleased to hear that the Sun City Vistoso Board of Directors has granted Fido's Friends Dog Club authorization to finalize plans fro a proposed dog park on the site by the retention basin off Del Webb Boulevard. It is our understanding the Board of Directors would like some indication from the Town of Oro Valley Community Development Department that construction of a dog park will be permitted on this site. The dog park does not require submission of a development plan. As we have advised Bill Abel, only a Type I Grading Permit will be required. The Town must also verify that the parking lot for the facility will be compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Public Works is working with Mr. Abel to assist him in meeting any requirements. However, since the property is under Sun City Community Association ownership, the Town must be provided written notification the Community Association has approved the construction of the dog park on its property. Until the Towrt receives the Association's documented pens ission, we will be unable to release any necessary permits. Please contact me at 229-4814 or imainion-farrar@orovalley.net if the Sun City Community Association has any questions or if additional information is required from the Town. We look forward to the successful completion of this project. S' cerely ill Manion -Farrar �- Planner Cc: Bill Abel, Fido's Friends Dog Club Don Sikkink, Director, Sun City Community Association John Sellers, Director, Sun City Community Association Jane Arndorfer, Director, Sun City Community Association Mike Valencic, Oro Valley Public Works Paul Keesler, Oro Valley Public Works www.townoforovalley.com 1XP_ ED 19 December 19, 2005 TOWN OF ORO VALLN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning and Zoning • Building Safety 11000 N. La Canada Drive, Oro Valley, AZ 85737 - (520) 229-4800 - Fax (520) 742-1022 Oro Valley Public Library 1305 W. Naranja Drive, Oro Valley, AZ 85737 - (520) 229-5300 - Fax (520) 229-5319 Parks and Recreation 680 W. Calle Concordia, Oro Valley, AZ 85737 - (520) 229-5050 - Fax (520) 797-2202 William Abel Fido's Friends Dog Club 1726 East Mellow Trail Oro Valley, AZ 85755 (520) 797-1049 RE: OV 12-05-38 Pre -application conference request for Fido's Friends Dog Park; west side of Del Webb Road, adjacent to Holes 2, 3 and 6 of Sun City Vistoso Golf Course, Parcel #223-01-002N. Dear Mr. Abel, Thank you for submitting the pre -application conference request for the Development Plan of Fido's Friends Dog Park. Comments provided by relevant agencies for the pre -application conference are attached for your records. The Planning and Zoning Division has determined that the following are required to move forward with the construction of the Dog Park: Building Permit Type I Grading Permit Native Plant Preservation, Salvage, and Mitigation Plan When you are preparing the permit applications, the appropriate personnel to contact is: ao Patty Hayes, Zoning Inspector at 229-4819 Mike Valencic, Civil Engineering Technician at 229-4869 I will forward all pertinent information to these staff members. I recommend that you contact Mike and Patty at your earliest convenience, prior to the submittal of the permit application, in order to determine additional information they may need as well as familiarize yourself with the requirements of each permit. I appreciate your patience as the Planning and Zoning Division determined the nature and applicable statutes for this project. This concludes my assistance in this matter. It was a pleasure meeting with you to discuss this project and I wish you luck on its completion. C dial , ill Manion -Farrar Planner 520.229.4814 jmanion-farrar(a,orovalley.net Attachments: Department of Public Works, Golder Ranch Fire District, Oro Valley Police F:\OV\OV12\2005\12-05-38\correspondence www.townoforovalley.com TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Department of Public Works 11000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 (520) 229-4880 Fax (520) 229-4899 www.townoforovalley.com December 2, 2005 William Abel Re: Pre -Application Conference, OV12-05-38, Fido's Friend Dog Club Town of Oro Valley Department of Public Works staff offers the comments listed below. Note these comments are preliminary in nature and subject to change upon receipt of more detailed information. These comments are for guidance and are not a substitute for all applicable Town of Oro Valley, Pima County, State of Arizona and Federal codes, regulations, ordinances and/or laws. DRAINAGE A professional civil engineer registered in the state of Arizona will be required to submit a drainage statement in accordance to the Town of Oro Valley's Drainage Manual Criteria.. Department of Public Works personnel will review and comment back on the initial submittal. Please note that the scope of the report should be proportional to the scope of the project. 2. SOUS A geotechnical soils report containing all geotechnical engineering information and recommendations applicable to this project. The minimum geotechnical information to be included in the report is as follows: 1. Soil stability of all proposed cut and fill slopes 2. Angle of shear and maximum recommended slope ratio of all proposed cuts or fill 3. Erosion vulnerability of all graded areas and created slopes 4. Stormwater siltation potential of soils for all graded areas and created slopes 5. Description of soil constraints on the structural design of all foundations footings and walls 6. Recommended compaction treatment of all fill areas 7. Identification of any potentially hazardous geotechnical areas where construction is proposed 8. Recommended treatment for stability, erosion and siltation control of all new graded areas and created slopes 9. Determination of a pavement design section for driveway, parking areas and roadways 10. Foundation design recommendations Soil classification and design bearing capacity shall be shown on the grading plan for all areas where structures are proposed. 3. LANDSCAPING Please ensure that there is coordination between the landscape architect and the engineer preparing the drainage and grading plans. 5. GRADING Grading shall be in conformance with the Town of Oro Valley Grading Ordinance chapter 27.7 OVZCR 6. GENERAL INFORMATION Restoration Assurances approved by the Planning and Zoning Department will be required prior to the issuance of a grading permit, see Section 26.6 of the OVZCR. 7. DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONFORMANCE Development Plans shall meet all requirements of the OVZCR Section 4-504. CON MENTS: • Provide a parking layout per OVZCR chapter 27. • Provide a location for waste containers. • Provide a Development Plan per OVZCR Sec. 4-205 If you have any questions, please call Mike Valencic at 229-4869 S' ceref y, Craig Civalier, P.E. Town Engineer GOLDER RANCH FIRE DISTRICT Prevention Division R� r Helping to make our community a better, safer place to live! RANC'+� International Fire Code 2003 Edition TO: Town of Oro Valley Planning and Zoning Division FROM: Steven Schoon, Fire Marshal DATE: December 9, 2005 PROJECT: Fido's Friends Dog Club, Del Webb BLVD, OV12-05-38 PLAN REVIEW: Fire Code Review of the Preliminary Application Submittal Documents Please provide the following Fire Code review comments to the applicant for the above referenced project. 1. Will there be an address established for the dog park? An address would be helpful to direct emergency medical and police personnel to the site if needed. 2. 1 do not have any Fire Code Review comments for this project. Please call me at 818-1017 if I can be of assistance, Steven Schoon, Fire Marshal Golder Ranch Fire District - Prevention Division 3535 E. Hawser St.; Tucson, Arizona 85739 520-818-1017 Fax 520-825-8043 www.golderranchfire.org prevention(�golderranchfire.orQ Proudly Serving Our Community with Strong Hands & Caring Hearts Since 1977. Serving as the Fire Marshal for the Town of Oro Valley since 1999. OQo p LI EY gA�20 h ED %g1 Project Number: Project Title: Transmittal Due: Date: TOWN OF ORO VALLEY BUILDING PERMIT orrice or Community Development 11000 N. Le Canada Dr. 520-229-4800 Office 520-742-1022 Fax OV 12-05-3 8 Fido's Friends Dog Club December 2, 2005 November 18, 2005 Check lists are available for your use in preparing construction documents for application for building permits on your projects at the customer service counter in the Town of Oro Valley Community Development Services building at 11000 N. La Canada, Oro Valley, Arizona or on line at http://www.ei.oro-valley.az.us/commdev/t)ldg forms.htm . The following comments are provided to further assist you in preparation submittal of documents: 1. The codes currently enforced by the Town of Oro Valley Building Safety Division are the 2003 editions of the International Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Fuel Gas, Energy Conservation Codes, the Arizonan's With Disabilities Act and the 2002 National Electrical Code. It is anticipated that the Town of Oro Valley will be enforcing the 2006 editions of the above mentioned International Codes and the 2005 edition of the National Electrical Code beginning July 1, 2006. 2. Plans submitted for review of this project will be required to be designed to demonstrate compliance with the codes adopted and enforced by the Town of Oro Valley at the time of Building Permit application. 3. Minimum plumbing facilities as required by Section 403 and Table 403.1 of the International Plumbing Code are required. The number of restrooms and service sinks can be significantly reduced in multi -tenant buildings when public restrooms and service sinks are centrally located, within the travel distances required by Sections 403.4 through 403.6.1 and are accessible to all tenant spaces while occupied. 4. Minimum outdoor air as required by Section 403 of the International Mechanical Code (occupancy and volume per Table 403.3). 5. Fire flow on site must be approved by the Town Fire Marshal. 6. Fire service water lines are required to have a backflow prevention device installed in compliance with the 2003 International Plumbing and Fire Codes. 7. Emergency vehicle access must approved by the Town Fire Marshal. 8. Fire hydrants supplied with the required fire flow per the Fire Code adopted by the Town of Oro Valley must be installed, tested, inspected, and approved by the Pagel of 2 0�ir Town Fire Marshal prior issuance of building permits or placing any combustibles, including construction trailers, on site. 9. Per Section 1003.3.1.8 of the 2000 International Building Code, all egress doors (required and non -required) must have locking hardware that is readily operable from the egress side without the use of a key or special knowledge or effort and shall comply with the Arizonan's With Disabilities Act. 10. Please ensure that building areas comply with Chapter 5 of the 2003 IBC. 11. Please ensure that the exterior wall fire rating complies with Tables 601, 602, and Chapter 7 of the 2003 International Building Code. It appears that Buildings ! and 2 may have a fire separation distance between 5' and 10' which could require the exterior walls in that location to be 1 or 2-hour fire -rated exterior walls. 12. Please ensure that the use separations comply with Section 302.3 of the 2003 International Building Code. 13. When permits are issued to construct shell buildings, tenant improvement permits cannot be issued in that structure or portion thereof until a Certificate of Substantial Completion has been issued for the shell building. 14. Construction of private sewers are required to have plumbing permits and inspections from the Town of Oro Valley & shall comply with the edition of the International Plumbing Code adopted by the Town of Oro Valley and in effect in the at the time of permit application.. 15. All blasting operations require a separate blasting permit. 16. In order to assist our customers the Building Safety Division can meet with your building design team to perform a cursory, preliminary review of construction plans. The plans need to be a minimum of 75% completed. This review will not be a complete plan review but is done to assist you in identifying any significant issues. 17. Provide at least one accessible route to the facility in accordance with ADAAG section 4.1.3. ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: SHIRLEY GAY, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR FROM: MARK MOORE, NEW DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR SUBJECT:FIDO'S FRIENDS DOG CLUB OV-12-05-38 DATE: 11/18/2005 CC: DAVID RUIZ, ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATOR • The proposed development lies in the utility's G Zone. • If an extension of existing infrastructure is required a water improvement plan will need to be submitted to the Utility for review and approval. • Before submitting a plan to the Utility, the engineer must receive from the Fire Marshall specific fire flow requirements, i.e., capacity, number and location of fire hydrants. This information must be submitted along with the plan to the Utility for review and approval. • A PCDEQ Certificate for the Approval to Construct or a Waiver will be required and provided to the Utility before construction can begin. • A Line Extension Agreement must be signed and returned to the Utility before construction can begin. • A PCDEQ Certificate for the Approval Of Construction will need to be issued and provided to the Utility before water service can begin. • Easements for the placement of public water facilities, i.e., water lines, fire hydrants, etc., on private property must be submitted to the Utility for review and approval. The approved legal description and sketch will need to be recorded by the Engineer and a copy provided to the Utility before construction is finaled. • The contractor must arrange for a pre -construction meeting with the Utility before construction of the water system can begin. • These comments are in no way all inclusive as a hydraulic review of a submitted water improvement plan must be completed. SUN CITY VISTOSO COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC. BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING BOARD MEETING MINUTES October 25, 2005 • 9:00 AM • Auditorium A) Call to Order Meeting of the Board of Directors of SUN CITY VISTOSO COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC. (hereafter "Association"), an Arizona corporation, was held in the Social Hall, 1495 E. Rancho Vistoso Blvd. on Tuesday, October 25 at 9:02 a.m. 1) Attendance Present at the meeting were: Board Members: Jane Arndorfer, Jerry Natt, Jim Ostheimer (acting chair), Gay Russell, John Sellers and Don Sikkink; General Manager, Scott Devereaux; Director of Operations, Colleen Heinemann and Robin Coulter, Recording Secretary. Absent: Bob Rubino, Chair. B) President's Remarks C) Minutes 1) Approval of September 27, 2005 Board Meeting Minutes Motion to approve the minutes of September 27, 2005 with the understanding the sentence bolded in I1 will be completed by Sikkink, seconded by Arndorfer. Motion unanimously approved. D) Town of Oro Valley - K.C. Carter. The Council voted no on the utility tax. Pertaining to Vestar, a ruling accepted the appeals courts earlier ruling which would have allowed it to go before the Town for a vote, March 14. The issue was challenged and is again back in court. Efforts continue on obtaining a light at Innovation and Rancho Vistoso. Candidates so far for office are Mayor Loomis, Conny Culver, and Don Cox. The Pusch View Bridge should be completed by the middle of November. Information will be forthcoming on the General Plan. The Town has requested the money approved in the recent bond passed for the Marana Town Site is transferred to acquiring the Steam Pump Ranch parcel. E) Financial Report 1) Auditor's Report — Year Ending June 30, 2005 Marianne DeVries, of DeVries CPAs of Arizona, P.C. reported the auditor's position was that the financial statements are in agreement with accounting practices. She presented an overview of the financial statements listed in the audit. Motion to approve the audit report for the year ending June 30, 2005 by Natt, seconded by Sellers. Motion unanimously approved. 2) September Financial Report — Patrick Boulton reported heavier investing in short-term CDs, over $2 million. Accounts receivable indicated 16 home owners have not paid their dues. The work in progress of almost $2 million is primarily the irrigation project. Fund balances total $13,868,000. The average yield acq investments total $3,489,000. Revenues have exceede WwZix-) primarily attributed to the success in the Cafe. Expens reserve purchases in September included tread mills, S ' the golf course project. Asset Reserve balance, 9 $174,000; Contingency Fund balance, $112,000. Rot months are down about 13% from the previous year budgeted. The Finance -Budget meeting is November 1 Motion to approve the September financial repo Russell. Motion unanimously approved. F) Committee Reports 1) Architectural Review — No report. 2) Community Assistance — George Holthus reports can collections are continuing as usual with a group of volunteers delivering cans to the recycler. The Loan Room has a modest remodeling project revising shelving and storage racks which is about half completed. The Loan Room currently does not have car seats meeting requirements. for children 40 lb. and under due to the changing of standards and regulations. Residents should encourage company with children in this weight range to bring a seat with them. The Tucson Arizona Boys Chorus was a good concert, but attendance was only enough to break even. The Pancake Breakfast will be Saturday, November 5. 3) Consumer Referral - Bill Saunders reports 135 referrals have been made, the group is open five days a week. One vendor has been added and three removed for inability to prove insurance. A presentation of the Arizona State Registrar of Contractors will be held November 15, 2 PM, Auditorium. 4) Finance -Budget — Michael Kaye reports the accounting firm gave a preliminary report on the audit. The review of the operating procedures of the Association has been completed. A sub -committee has been established to address the golf program and will be working with a sub -committee of the Golf Advisory Committee to develop a recommendation on the golf program/fee structure. The next meeting will be Wednesday, November 16, 9 AM, Social Hall/Hopi. This meeting will be a review of the investment practices and a discussion of the budgeting process. 5) Gift Shop — No report. 6) Golf Advisory — John Sellers reports a sub -committee will be working on a golf program/fee structure recommendation. The Golf Beautification Program continues to receive monies; currently 28% of its goal of $27,000 has been reached. The Lady Niners made over $2,000 at the Courtyard Sale towards the Golf Beautifications Project. 7) Government Affairs — Dean Strandskov reports a meeting on the General Plan will be held. A meeting with council members, Talk of the Town, will also be held on the last Tuesday of the month, 2 PM, Social Hall/Kachina Lounge. 8) Marketing — Jim Ostheimer reports assignments have been dividing up among committee members. The committee needs a chairman. 9) Neighborhood Pride — Report will be given later in the agenda. 10) Nominating — Bill Abel reports the committee has been working since August. The following names are submitted for election: Hank Jepsen, Jonathan Leonard, Bill McCarthy, Jim Ostheimer, Al Percy, Bill Saunders, Sharyn Rafieyan, George Williams. These are all qualified residents of Sun City Vistoso. 11) Posse — Jack Nelmark membership is at 646. The committee assisted in traffic control for the Courtyard Sale. The Posse was featured in an article by the Northwest section of the Arizona Star indicating the cost efficiency of the committee. 12) Properties — Gay Russell reports information is being gathered on the roof in the cart barn area and for a possible expansion. The chemical storage is being reviewed. The annual inspection will be conducted next month. 13) Space Analysis Task Force — Scott Devereaux reports the recommendation from the committee will be forthcoming. The report will be on the agenda for the next Study Session. 14) TIPSTER Editorial — Don Sikkink reported they are meeting and working on the editing of the Tipster. G) Consent Agenda — No items. H) General Manager's Report - Major cleaning and painting was done to the Cafd. Formost is basically done with its work on the golf course, on time and under budget. The course opened Monday, October 24. Over -seeding has been completed. The irrigation system is working well. On October 17 Sun City Vistoso was the first entity in Oro Valley to begin using reclaimed water. The Town has reported about 1,000 gallons a minute can be pumped. Readings have indicated 800-900 gallons per minute, but the amount is currently sufficient. The Sports Complex ladies' locker room has been opened; the men's locker room should open in two weeks. t 1) Unfinished Business 1) Clay Club Kilns — Relocation Status Report, Cost Estimates and Direction. Discussion on this item will be postponed pending the report of the Craft Complex Space Analysis Committee. J) New Business 1) Excess Revenues 2004-2005 — Recommendation of where.to allocate surplus. Motion to approve the staff recommendation pertaining to the allocation of the excess in the Contingency Fund as indicated in the October 21, 2005 memo from Controller Patrick Boulton by Russell, seconded by Natt. Motion unanimously approved. 2) Chalk Creek Wash — Review of quote for design to resolve erosion behind driving range. Motion to proceed with the report on the Chalk Creek wash as indicated in the September 30, 2005 WLB letter by Arndorfer, seconded by Natt. Motion unanimously approved. 3) Entrance Signs — Review quotes of landscape design concepts for entrance sign areas. The feeling of the Board was this project was not a priority. It may be something for the Foundation to consider. 4) Committee Approvals: a) Neighborhood Pride (1) Revised Mission Statement (2) Approval of Chair . (3) Approval of Members (4) Approval of Liaison -- Motion—to_approve-_the—Neighbor_hoodP_ridCommittee revised Mission__ _ Statement, chair, members, and Board Liaison by Natt, seconded by Sellers. Motion unanimously approved. b) Election — New member Motion to add Fran Prutzanni to the Election Committee by Sellers, seconded by Natt. Motion unanimously approved. 5) Bocce Court Renovations Motion to approve the Bocce Club's requested additional $675, totaling $3,175, as per the October 14, 2005 memo from Ray Bruns for "the improvements to the Bocce Courts by Arndorfer, seconded by Sellers. Motion unanimously approved. 6) Membership Dues Collection Motion for the Board to ask staff to prepare an analysis of a split dues system which should be forwarded to the Budget -Finance Committee for study and a recommendation to the Board by Sikkink, seconded by Natt. Motion unanimously approved. 7) Pet Partners Club — Bylaw Change Motion to approve the proposed name change from Pet Partners to Fido's Friends by Sikkink, seconded by Arndorfer. Motion unanimously approved. 8) Proposed Dog Park a) CC&R Amendment Motion for the Board to place the following CC&R amendment on the spring 2006 ballot to Amend Article IV, Section 2c (i), page 18 which now reads "No animals shall be permitted upon Common Areas except as controlled on a leash or similar device held by the owner" to read, "No animals shall be permitted .�� .� !..-� �. A �. .. ..�.... -.L .... ......+....11n.l n.. .. 1n. h n.. 4w.^a hvy *ha owner or his or her agent or in a fenced area designated as an `Off -Leash Dog Park"' allowing changes to the language to encompass prohibiting animals on the golf course and allowing an animal to be off -leash in a dog park by Sikkink, seconded by Natt. Motion unanimously approved. (suggested wording: Animals may be permitted on approved Common Areas when controlled on a leash or similar device or within the confines of a dog park.) b) Possible location Motion to give conditional approval to Fido's Friends proposed location for a dog park as presented at the October 14, 2005 Study Session with full approval for this location to occur when there is a successful amendment of the CC&R's allowing a park, when all permits required by Oro Valley have been received and when a final site plan is given to the General Manager by Sikkink, seconded by Sellers. Motion unanimously approved. K) Call to Audience — None. L) Adjournment at 11:10 a.m. Submitted by: &Von Robin Coulter Recording Secretary Approved by: Gay RussIll, Secretary Hi David, Here is the information for the Fido's Friends Dog Park. I guess this is the way it would be phrased. OV12-05-38, Pre -Application Conference, William Abel, representing Fido's Friends Dog Club, redquests preliminary review of an approximately 14,500 square foot dog park located between the 2" , 3rd and 6th holes of Sun City Vistoso Golf Course, on the west side of Del Webb Road, Parcel 223-01-002N Date Transmitted: November 30, 2005??? Project Leader: Jill Manion -Farrar, iman ion-farrar(a)-orovalley. net Written Comments Due: December VW 9 (Send to Development Coordinator: sgay a,orovalley.net) -----Original Message ----- From: Ronquillo, David Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 3:30 PM To: Manion -Farrar, Jill Subject: DRC information example This is an example of the information I need for the agendas; OV12-04-1.8, (Pre -Application, Formal Application or Pre -Hearing Review), Gregor & Grenier Engineering Inc., representing LCB Investors, requests approval of a Preliminary Plat for condominium units, located in proximity to the northwest corner of Oracle Road and Magee Road, Parcel 225-16-2810 Date Transmitted: November 17, 2005 Project Leader: David Ronquillo, dronquillo(a�orovalley.net Written Comments Due: December 5, 2005 (Send to Development Coordinator: sgayaorovalley.net) ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Craig Civalier, Town Engineer Fritz Laos, Public Works Marvin Miller, Public Works Amy Sloane, Police Department Tim Rowe, Pima County Wastewater Steve Schoon, Golder Ranch Fire District Lisa Castillo, Tucson Electric Power Jeff Weir, Economic Development Ainsley Reeder, Parks & Recreation Administrator Nancy Ellis, Parks & Recreation Brent Sinclair, Community Development Director Bayer Vella, Principal Planner Terry Vosler, Building Division Administrator Chris Kiel, Building Division Chuck Sweet, Town Manager Mark Moore, Oro Valley Water Charles Soper, Oro Valley Water Bob Jacklitch, Oro Valley Water Kevin McCaleb, Oro Valley Water Chuck Kidwell, Transit Services Administrator FROM: David Ronquillo, Senior Planner DATE: December 6, 2005 LOCATION: Hopi Room, Development Services Building RE: Development Review Committee Agenda for Friday December 9, 2005 9:00 a.m. OV 12-05-38, Pre -Application Conference, William Abel, representing Fido's Friends Dog Club, requests preliminary review of an approximately 14,500 square foot dog park, located between the 2nd, 3Td and 61' holes of Sun City Vistoso Golf Course on the west side of Del Webb Road, Parcel 223-01-002N Date Transmitted: November 18, 2005 Project Leader: Jill Manion -Farrar, imanion-farrar(a-),orovalley.net Written Comments Due: December 9, 2005 (Send to Development Coordinator: sgay(o-)orovalley.net) 9:20 a.m. Project Representative: William Abel SUN CITY VISTOSO PET PARTNERS CLUB (SCVPPC) SCVPPC DOG PARK (PROPOSED) ABOUT DOG PARKS POLICIES & PROCEDURES REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCESS AND APPLICATION RULES, USER AGREEMENT & UNCONDITIONAL RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS PUBLIC NOTICE 3 ABOUT DOG PARKS draft 8/9/05 Taking your dog to a dog park to socialize with other dogs can be a very enjoyable experience for both dog and owner! Your dog gets needed exercise and an opportunity to play with other dogs. As the dog owner, you can enjoy the benefits of socializing with other dog owners while knowing that your dog is in a secure environment suited especially for him. Dog's with suitable temperaments running naturally off leash can further define their personalities for owners -- and at the same time, provide considerable entertainment for dog and owners alike! If your dog is generally RELIABLE, CONTROLLABLE, PREDICTABLE, OUTGOING and FRIENDLY around other people and other dogs, he may enjoy a dog park. Not all dogs do enjoy cavorting with unfamiliar dogs, their personalities differ. What is fun for one dog may stress another. Non -neutered male dogs and aggressive dogs do not belong in a dog park. Fil POLICIES & PROCEDURES THE SCVPPC DOG PARK SHALL BE MANAGED AND FINANCED BY THE THE SCV PET PARTNER CLUB (SCVPPC) ACCORDING TO THE FOLLOWING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES APPROVED BY DUES PAYING MEMBERS OF THE CLUB. POLICIES 1. PARK ACCESS WILL BE FOR SCVPPC DUES PAYING MEMBERS ONLY. 2. ACCESS APPROVAL WILL BE GRANTED WHEN ALL REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN SATISFIED. (SEE PROCEDURES) 2. ACCESS WILL BE BY KEYED ENTRY ISSUED ONLY TO CLUB MEMBERS WHO HAVE BEEN GRANTED ACCESS. 3. THE PARK SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN GOOD REPAIR AND KEPT CLEAN AT ALL TIMES. 4. PLASTIC BAGS FOR FECES COLLECTION WILL BE SUPPLIED IN AN APPROPRIATE DISPENSER. 5. A PROPER RECEPTACLE FOR FECES COLLECTION WILL BE PLACED AT ENTRY TO PARK FOR REGULAR SCHEDULED TRASH PICKUP. 6. A SIGN SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT THE ENTRY GATE STATING PARK RULES AND WHO TO CONTACT FOR ACCESS OR WHO TO NOTIFY IN CASE OF VIOLATIONS. 7. RULES WILL BE ENFORCED BY ALL USERS OF THE PARK AND SCVPPC. VIOLATIONS MAY BE CAUSE FOR LOSS OF PARK ACCESS. PROCEDURES/REQUIREMENTS FOR DOG PARK ACCESS 1. Must be current member(s) of SCVPPC with a current member number. 2. Must be owner(s) of dog(s) using the park 3. Must provide a copy of dog owner's Home Owners Insurance Policy. 4. Provide a copy(s) of CURRENT (specified in application) Immunization Record of dog(s) using park. 5 5. Must complete and SIGN the following documents APPLICATION DOG PART: RULES & USER AGREEMENT (for quick reference copies of both documents follow - see separate documents in next two sections of packet) REQUIREMENTS FOR DOG PARK ACCESS AND APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS Must be current dues paying member (s) of the SCV Dog Club Must be owner(s) of dog(s) using the park Must complete and sign the following documents: Application Dog Park Rules & User Agreement Provide a copy of dog owner's Home Owners Insurance Policy Provide a copy(s) of CURRENT Dog License & Rabies Vaccination Certificate Provide a copy(s) of CURRENT Immunization Record from dog's Veterinarian to include the following immunizations: DA213P (Distemper, Adenovirus, Parainfluenza, Parvo & Bordetella ( Kennel Cough) APPLICATION SCVPPC Member Number Name: Address: Tel: E-mail Name of Dog; Breed: Weight: C (if registering a second dog) Name of Dog: Breed: Weight: signature(s) of dog's owner(s) date Attach Copies of. Dog License & Rabies Vaccination Certificate & Immunization Record Dog owner's Home Owners Insurance Policy DOG PARK RULES & USER AGREEMENT 1. Access for members only of SCVPPC and dog's owner - handler. 2. Dog Park will be open during daylight hours only. 3. Dogs must be leashed at all times when outside the dog park. 4. Dogs must have a current dog license and wear a current rabies tag and owner identification. Dogs must wear a buckle or flat collar at all times. (no choke collars) 5. A copy of dog's current immunizations must be on file with SCVPPC. Immunizations required: DA2PP (Distemper, Adenovirus, Parainfluenza, Parvo) & Bordetella ( Kennel Cough) 6. On entry, outside gate must be closed and the dog unleashed before the inside gate is opened. 7. Owners must carry a leash at all times. 8. Dogs must be in view and supervised at all times. 9. Aggressive or excessively barking or yelping dogs must be removed immediately. 10. Dogs that are ill or in heat and non -neutered male dogs are prohibited. 11. No puppies under 6 months of age allowed. 12. No food, alcohol, smoking or dog toys allowed in the park. 13. No children under the age of 16 allowed in the park 14. Feces must br picked up immediately and placed in proper receptacle. 7 15. No more than two dogs per owner per visit. 16. Park is wheelchair accessible but a second owner -handler must accompany the person in the wheelchair. ACCESS FOR LARGE & SMALL DOGS SHALL BE ON ALTERNATE DAYS Park management and enforcement of rules shall be the responsibility of SCVPPC. To report violations or problems or to apply for access to the park contact the following: I have read, understand and agree to comply fully with the SCVPPC DOG PARK RULES. signature of dog owner date In consideration of the benefits derived from my use of this off -leash facility and In accordance with Arizona law and statutes you hereby agree to assume all risks inherent in the use of this facility and release the Sun City Vistoso community Association from any damage claims arising by reason of your use of this facility, including damages and injury caused by the acts of other users and their animals. (dogs) re: Tucson Code Section 4-102 (disposal of solid waste) and Arizona Revised Statute 11-1025 (Liability for dog bites) signature of dog owner date REQUIREMENTS FOR DOG PARK ACCESS AND APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS Must be current (dues paying) member (s) of the SCV Dog Club Must be owner(s) of dog(s) using the park Must complete and sign the following documents: Application Dog Park Rules & User Agreement Provide a copy of dog owner's Home Owner Insurance Policy Provide a copy(s) of CURRENT Dog License & Rabies Vaccination Certificate Provide a copy(s) of CURRENT Immunization Record from dog's Veterinarian to include the following immunizations: DA2PP (Distemper, Adenovirus, Parainfluenza, Parvo & Bordetella ( Kennel Cough) APPLICATION SCVPPC Member Number Name: Address: Tel: E-mail Name of Dog; ` Breed: Weight: (if registering a second dog) Name of Dog: Breed: Weight: signature(s) of dog's owner(s) date Attach Copies of: Dog License & Rabies Vaccination Certificate & Immunization Record Dog owner's Home Owner Insurance Policy 10 SCVPPC DOG PARK RULES, USER AGREEMENT & UNCONDITIONAL RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS 1. Access for members only of SCVPPC and dog's owner -handler. 2. Dog Park will be open during daylight hours only. 3. Dogs must be leashed at all times when outside the dog park. 4. Dogs must have a current dog license and wear a current rabies tag and owner identification. Dogs must wear a buckle or flat collar at all times. (no choke or slip collars) 5. A copy of dog's current immunizations must be on file with SCVPPC. Immunizations required: DA2PP (Distemper, Adenovirus, Parainfluenza, Parvo & Bordetella ( Kennel Cough) 6. On entry, outside gate must be closed and the dog unleashed before the inside gate is opened. 7. Owners must carry a leash at all times. 8. Dogs must be in view and supervised at all times. 9. Aggressive or excessively barking -or yelping dogs must be removed immediately. 10. Dogs that are ill or in heat and non -neutered male dogs are prohibited. 11. No puppies under 6 months of age allowed. 12. No food, alcohol, smoking or dog toys allowed in the park. 13. No children under the age of 16 allowed in the park 14. Feces must br picked .up immediately and placed in proper receptacle. 15. No more than two dogs per owner per visit 11 16. Park is wheelchair accessible but a second owner -handler must accompany the person in the wheelchair. ACCESS FOR LARGE a SMALL DOGS S'riALL BE Oiv AL T ERNA T E DAYS Park management and enforcement of rules is the responsibility of SCVPPC. To report violations or problems or to apply for access to the park contact the following: I have read, understand and agree to comply fully with the SCVPPC DOG PARK RULES. signature of dog owner date In consideration of the benefits derived from my use of this off - leash facility and in accordance with Arizona law and statutes I hereby agree to assume all risks inherent in the use of this facility and release the Sun City Vistoso Community Association from any damage claims arising by reason of my use of this facility, including damages and injury caused by the acts of other users and their animals. (dogs) re: Tucson Code Section 4-102 (disposal of solid waste) and Arizona Revised Statute 11-1025 (Liability for dog bites) signature of dog owner See Attached: date OTHER "UNCONDITIONAL RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS" TO CO1'�iISIDER 12 OTHER "UNCONDITIONAL RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS" TO CONSIDER I hereby agree to assume all risks inherent in the use of this facility and unconditionally release the Sun City Vistoso Community Association, Inc. and the Sun City Pet Partners Club from any damage claims arising by reason of my use'of this facility, including damages and injury caused by the acts of other users and their animals. (dogs) This release shall be governed by the laws of the State of Arizona to include and according to Tucson Code Section 4-102 (disposal of solid waste) and Arizona Revised Statute 11-1025 (Liability for dog bites). m I hereby and unconditionally release, remise, and forever discharge, waive and acquit, SCVCAI and the Sun City Pet Partners Club and all of their members, directors, officers, employees and agents (collectively, "Released parties"), and any other person, firm, corporation or entity which may be liable or responsible for the Released parties with respect to the use of this off -leash facility to include damages and injury caused by the acts of other users and their animals. (dogs) This release shall be governed by the laws of the State of Arizona to include and according to Tucson Code Section 4-102 (disposal of solid waste) and Arizona Revised Statute 11-1025 (Liability for dog bites). (SIGNATURE) (PRINT NAME) 13 PUBLIC NOTICE (sign posted at park entry) SUN CITY PET PARTNERS CLUB PARK RULES 1. Access for members only of SCVPPC and dog's owner - handler. 2. Dog Park will be open during daylight hours only. 3. Dogs must be leashed at all times when outside the dog park. 4. Dogs must have a current dog license and wear a current rabies tag and owner identification. Dogs must wear a buckle or flat collar at all times. (no choke collars) 5. A copy of dog's current immunizations must be on file with SCVPPC. Immunizations required: DA2PP (Distemper, Adenovirus, Parainfluenza, Parvo & Bordetella ( Kennel Cough) 6. On entry, outside gate must be closed and the dog unleashed before the inside gate is opened. 7. Owners must carry a leash at all times. 8. Dogs must be in view and supervised at all times. 9. Aggressive or excessively barking or yelping dogs must be removed immediately. 10. Dogs that are ill or in heat and non -neutered male dogs are prohibited. 11. No puppies under 6 months of age allowed. 12. No food, alcohol, smoking or dog toys allowed in the park. 13. No children under the age of 16 allowed in the park 14 14. Feces must br picked up immediately and placed in proper receptacle. 15. No more than two dogs per owner per visit. 16. The park is wheelchair accessible but a second owner -handier must accompany the person in the wheelchair. ACCESS FOR LARGE & SMALL DOGS SHALL BE ON ALTERNATE DAYS Park management and enforcement of rules is the responsibility of SCVPPC. To report violations or problems or apply for access to the park contact: In consideration of the benefits derived from your use of this off - leash facility and in accordance with Arizona law and statutes you have agreed to assume all risks inherent in the use of this facility and release the Sun City Vistoso Community Association from any damage claims arising by reason of your use of this facility, including damages and injury caused by the acts of other users and their animals. (dogs) re: Tucson Code Section 4-102 (disposal of solid waste) and Arizona Revised Statute 11-1025 (Liability for dog bites) 15 JpLLEY Aly O ' 20?i E. y� A A • }cOL D w1a� Planning and Zoning Division 11000 N. La Canada Drive, Oro Valley AZ 85737 Phone: (520) 2294900 Fax: (520) 742-1022 Web Site Address: www.townoforovalley.com REQUEST FOR PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: LOCATION: PARCEL NUMBER: TYPE OF REQUEST: _ APPLICANT NAME/FIRM: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: PROPERTY OWNER: SIGNATURE: FAX NO.: EMAIL: DATE: PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE DATE REQUESTED: (Office use only) o SUBMITTALS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT LEAST TEN (10) WORKING DAYS IN ADVANCE OF THE DESIRED PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE DATE. o SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS "ALL PLANS MUST BE FOLDED PER PIMA COUNTY FOLD." o TWENTY (20) COPIES (24X36) OF THE PROJECT CONCEPT PLAN, WITH LOCATION MAP. o TWO (2) COPY OF SITE RESOURCE INVENTORY PER SEC. 14-104 OF OVZCR. 16 MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE Weed Control: To be done manually by the Pet Partners Club membership. Surface Maintenance: Individual owner responsible for filling holes dug by dogs. Periodic raking by club membership Fence maintenance: Estimate of painting need every 5 years. Cost $400. To be paid by club. Waste disposal: Periodic pickup by association as now being done along Del Webb. 17 TYPE 1 GRADING PLAN INFORMATION Introduction The Public Works Development Review Division staff that reviews type 1 grading plans includes: Craig Civalier, RE 'f Linda Garrick Mike Valencic Purpose of this Packet The general purpose of this packet is to familiarize citizens, architects, engineers, designers, developers, builders and contractors with the Town of Oro Valley Grading Ordinance and other applicable sections of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised, OVZCR. It is our intent to give instruction on the Town's method of reviewing type 1 grading plans per the above ordinance. Type 1 grading plans and permits are required in Oro Valley for the development of custom residential lots. Applicable Sections of the OVZCR and Other Ordinances (some of these documents are available at the front counter and online at www.townoforovalley.net) Grading Ordinance, Procedures, Section, 2.2.10, and Standards, Section 27.9 of the OVZCR '~ Hill Side Development Zone, HDZ, Section 24.2 of the OVZCR Town of Oro Valley Floodplain Management Code >0- Town of Oro Valley Subdivision Street Standards PAD Grading Standards 0 There are subdivisions in the Town that have certain grading standards of their own. These grading standards are found in the Planned Area Development Document for the subdivision. The subdivisions in the Town that have PAD grading standards are: Rancho Vistoso Sections La Reserve El Conquistador ► Monterra Hills Melcor Pima County Grading Ordinance ' There are subdivisions in the Town that have pre -development agreements that allow the Pima County grading standards. Those subdivisions are: + Palisades Point it Naranj a Ridge a� Floodplain Use Permit It Some lots may require a floodplain use permit where driveways cross floodplains. IF In these cases the applicant shall secure the services of a registered civil engineer to prepare a hydrology / drainage report to design the driveway so that no more than six inches of water flows across the driveway for the 100-year event. 11 After we approve the report and design, an application for a flood plain use permit will be accepted with two original copies of the approved report. '= The permit will be processed and made a condition of the grading permit. All of the appropriate information from the report and design shall be shown on the grading plan. A fee of $370 shall be submitted with the floodplain use permit application. Subdivision Street Standards The Town of Oro Valley Subdivision Street Standards contains specific information on driveway design and placement. + It is the applicant's responsibility to assure that the proposed design meets these standards. Grading Plan Review The items we need to review grading plans are: ✓ Preliminary or Tentative Plat ✓ Registered Land Surveyor, RLS, or Registered Civil Engineer, CE, certified topography ✓ Benchmark information provided by RLS or CE ✓ Final Plat ✓ OVZCR, Grading Ordinance and the Hillside Development Zone Article, HDZ ✓ Subdivision Street Standards ✓ Soils report ✓ Drainage report ✓ Grading plan ✓ PAD standards if they apply Review Procedure ..►J-�- ------ --Building Permit Application Review 11 ^ The building permit application is reviewed for completeness. +i! We focus on the grading statement on page 2 of the permit application. + All of the requested information must be provided. Soils Report When we review the soils report it must contain information on the following items: Maximum slope for cuts and fills + Maximum height of slopes Types of slope treatments Benching requirements for fill areas Foundation design recommendations for residence and/or retaining/site walls as required for site specific construction. Grading Plan * The grading plan is reviewed using the type 1 Grading Permit Checklist as a guide. ♦ This checklist has been adapted from the Grading Ordinance, other sections of the OVZCR and Town standards. + We use the information from the building permit application to fill in the information on the top of the first page. +Iw All of the comments that apply to the review of a grading plan have the box next to them circled. ♦ Some comments are written on the blank lines that are included for the comment section. + A copy of the type 1 Grading Permit Checklist is provided for your use. ♦ Let's review the checklist item by item: 1) Assure that the Town of Oro Valley's seven general notes appear on the grading plan. 2) Make sure that the plan is labeled a "grading/site plan". 3) Don't forget to complete the grading statement on page 2 of the building permit application. 4) T1 e soils report must contain the information that is listed (see above items). 5) Sometime final plats contain notes with specific items that are required for the development of the lots within the subdivision. They must be addressed on the grading plan. 6) Bluelines or blacklines are required for review. a) The smallest scale is 1" = 20'. b) No architectural scales are acceptable. 7) For certain cases the grading plans must be prepared by registered civil engineers, architects, landscape architects, or other State of Arizona Registrant that has capacity to prepare grading plans. ► The two cases are: / If 15% slopes or greater are disturbed. If the Average Cross Slope, ACS, of the building pad is greater than 6%. ► The ACS shall be calculated by the flowing formula: ACS = I x L = contour interval times the lengths of all the contours of the lot or pad A total square feet of the lot or pad ► Where lot ACS of 15% or greater are encountered, the HDZ restrictions may apply. ► For certain subdivisions where HDZ restrictions apply, as the ACS increases, the gradeable area decreases. See the attached handout. 8) It is the responsibility of the applicant to provide topographical verification. Acceptable documents for this purpose are: I� Preliminary or tentative plats RLS or CE certified topography ► The pad grades and finished floor elevations shall be tied to a recognized benchmark and shall be noted on the grading plan. ► There are different types of recognized benchmarks. Some of them are: 1 USGS monuments 1 ADOT monuments ► Pima County monuments FEMA monuments Monuments set by RLS's and CE's ► As -built record map elevations of the inverts for sanitary sewer manholes 9) All boundary lines of the lot shall be shown on the grading plan. ► The boundary line data shall conform to information on the final plat for that subdivision. ► If the lot is not in a platted subdivision, a RLS shall seal and certify the boundary data. ► We can provide final plat information upon request. If you need final plat information, call us at 229-4800 or visit our offices at 11,000 North La Canada Drive during the business hours of 8 AM to 5 PM. 10) The grading plan shall show the locations of all utilities from the main in the street to the house. If a septic system is proposed, its location shall be shown. 11) The following items shall be shown and labeled on the grading plan: ► Streets, curbs, utilities and drainage structures ► Points of entry to the site ► All easements, floodplain limits, conservation and natural open space areas. Remember the lengths and bearings of these shall be labeled or shown in table form. 12) Both the existing and proposed contour lines shall be shown on the grading plan. ► The line type shall be varied for the existing and proposed contour lines so that it is easy to distinguish between the two. ► It is critical for our review that the proposed contour lines are depicted properly. 1 Do not cross one contour line with another of different elevation. Make sure that proposed contour lines connect to the existing contour lines of the same elevation. 1 The contour lines shall be scaleable and labeled with the appropriate elevation. 1 All slope grades shall be labeled. Allow for the appropriate slope run out. 13) All slope treatments, as well as the maximum slope for cuts and fills, shall be labeled per the soils report. `► The maximum cut or fill by the Grading Ordinance is 6-ft. ► Check with the PAD standards for subdivisions that have them. 14) It is very important that drainage be controlled either flowing off the street down a driveway or down a driveway into the street. ► We encourage that drainage be directed off of the driveway before it reaches the house or the street. ► Retaining walls or screen walls ► Appropriate erosion control measures shall be installed to prevent scour or erosion. 15) In order to assure positive drainage away from structures, sufficient spot elevations are required to be shown on the grading plan (initiated 4" below F.F.E. per 2003 I.R.C.). ► The minimum longitudinal grades are 1 % over earth and %2 % over concrete or asphalt. ► Provide at least a 5-ft area all around the proposed building that slopes 2% away from the building (initiated 4" below F.F.E. per 2003 I.R.C.). 16) All proposed and existing drainage channels, washes, culverts and swales shall be shown on the grading plan. ► Appropriate erosion control measures shall be installed to prevent scour or erosion. Ir Specify and call out erosion control measures on the grading plan. ► Items required for retaining walls shown on grading plan to be addressed. 17) The grading limits shall be shown and labeled. ► Remember to allow for the appropriate slope runout, undisturbed buffers and construction area at all property lines. ► The Zoning Inspectors of the Town will assist you in staking out the grading limits. 18) Occasionally a cross sectional cut on the grading plan shall be required that depicts a line perpendicular to the slope of the existing grade. ► All necessary items as mentioned on the checklist shall be shown. ► Building height must be shown on this cross section. 19) It is important to show the locations of the roof drains and the appropriate erosion control methods for them on the grading plans. ► It is the applicant's and contractor's responsibility to assure positive drainage and that runoff will not negatively affect neighboring lots or parcels of land. 20) Interim erosion control is necessary for most grading activities. ► It is the applicant's responsibility to show and label these measures so that silt, mud and debris do not leave the site or contaminate neighboring property, washes and drainage channels. 21) A hydrology/hydraulic analysis may be required for a comprehensive review of the site. Applying for a grading permit in advance of a building permit ' A type 1 grading permit can be issued before a building permit is issued, if the grading plan has been approved. # There are two methods to do this: 1) Application can be made solely for a grading permit without the building permit. However the footprint of the house and first floor elevation(s) must be known. A copy of the approved grading plan must be submitted when the building plans come in for review. 2) When the building & grading plans are submitted for review, the grading permit can be issued prior to the building and safety review. However the following must be completed: The grading plan must be approved by the Planning reviewer. The grading plan must be approved by the Engineering reviewer. �► The staked grading limits must be inspected & approved by the Zoning Inspector. Split Plan Review Process +1' Various methods to expedite the review process have been formulated and attempted. The Split Plan Review Process has been incorporated as a measure to decrease overall review time of all custom homes. This process is not used however for model home reviews. ♦ Town of Oro Valley Zoning Code requires separate building and grading permits to be issued for all custom graded lots built within Town limits. Submittals including building/grading plans for review are processed at the counter, then sent to Zoning review of the grading plan for limits of grading, building height and setback verification. Zoning Code non compliance that requires corrections are then sent back to the applicant. Revised plans are resubmitted. When zoning has determined that their issues are addressed they will send the plans to Engineering for review. i► During Engineering review the grading plan is analyzed for site specific criteria (i.e. site drainage and limited requirements for cut and fill). Engineering review of the grading plan determines if code requirements can be met without structural element adjustments to the residence (i.e. slab elevations, retaining walls, shielded cuts, parapet heights or sloped roof heights). ♦ Subsequent actions by Engineering Review o If Zoning Code requirements are not met and major adjustments to grade and/or the building structure are required to bring grading plan into compliance, grading as well as building plans are returned to applicant for corrections. o If Zoning Code requirements are not met, but the Grading Plan is approvable with minor corrections to plan, then reviews may be separated (Grading from Building) to allow both reviews to proceed simultaneously. Thereby allowing grading plans to be sent to applicant for corrections while Building Safety begins review process. (Split Plan Review) o If Zoning Code requirements are met and Grading Plan is approved, Applicant is called by Engineering Review to setup for grading limits and salvage inspection by Zoning Inspector. If grading permit is requested prior to building permit and limits/ salvage are complete, grading permit may be issued while building plans are sent to Building Safety for review. If Grading Permit is not required until building review is complete, plans are kept together until Building Safety review is complete and both permits are issued. Approximately 80 % of all reviews fall into the Split Plan Review category. Each review is considered by default to be a Split Plan Review; therefore it is not necessary to request this process. Pad Elevation Certification + Pad elevation certifications are required for all homes built in the Town of Oro Valley. All grading plans are required to have a specific Finished Floor Elevation. The Pad Elevation Certification is a document provided by a R.L.S. or Civil Engineer stating the finish pad elevation or finish floor elevation. The elevation on this document verifies the proposed floor or pad elevation established by the approved grading plan and is provided to the field inspector prior to the first inspection (rough plumbing or preslab). 0 Retaining Walls i Retaining Walls have been approved for use on site only when Town of Oro Valley red stamp states Retaining Walls Approved. o Approval will state wall height maximums and detail with page/sheet number. 9) o Show exterior boundaries of the site in clearly delineated heavy weight lines o All property line dimensions and bearings must be per Final Plat including curve data (L, A, R) o See redlines for property boundary corrections o See attached information from the Final Plat 0 10) o Show all existing and proposed utilities or proposed trench locations on Grading Plan from road to house o HCS/W/E 11) o Show location and label existing streets, label streets as "PRIVATE" or "PUBLIC" o Clearly label Point -Of -Entry or Construction Access to the site o Show & delineate all existing easements or other easements of record as shown on the Final Plat o Label and delineate, per Final Plat, for the following: 0 100 Year Floodplain Limits o o Natural Open Space o See attached 0 Conservation Area o Correctly delineate easements with lengths and bearings per the Final Plat 0 12) o Show & label existing and proposed contour lines for entire property o Contour lines do not tie into existing contours; clarify o Proposed contour lines show slope grades that do not comply with the slope recommendations per soils report — redraw / correct o Show existing grade and proposed finished grades o Label grades for all proposed slopes with slope treatment per soils report 0 13) 0 If slope treatment is not specified in soils report, slope treatment must be labeled per Oro Valley Grading Ordinance: 0 3:1 (horizontal:vertical) or flatter must be o No slope shall exceed 1:1 revegetated o Remove any slope grade notation 0 2:1 (H:V) or flatter must be riprapped with that does not apply filter fabric 0 1:1 (H:V) or flatter must be grouted riprap or use retaining walls o Limit fill to 6 feet from natural or existing grade to finished grade directly below / above that point o Maintain a maximum of 8 feet of cut & fill for slopes, when terracing is utilized beyond footprint of house o Top of cut slope shall not be nearer than 1/5 the vertical height or minimum of 2 feet from property line o Toe of fill slope shall not be nearer than 1/2 the vertical height or minimum of 2 feet from property line 0 14) o Show how runoff will be directed across driveway to prevent direct runoff from or into the street o Provide a cross-section for driveway o Show erosion control measures at runoff discharge location for driveways o Label material for driveway o Label proposed grades / spot elevations / revised contours on driveways 0 Provide spot elevations in driveway depicting drainage at a minimum slope of 0.5% for concrete or asphalt 0 15) o Label residence FFE, and FIRE Label garage FFE. o Label and provide spot elevations & revised contours for slope interceptor swale o Show all proposed structures to be constructed (patios, pool areas, patio walls and property line walls) o Label patios that will have separate slab from the primary slab for the dwelling o Provide proposed spot elevations showing positive drainage away from proposed house for the following: o corners of patios / porches o inlet & outlet of drainage pipe o toe / top of slopes 0 low point(s) in yard o entrance area / front yards o back / side yards o provide 5 feet (min) of positive drainage at gradual slope (2% min) away from proposed building 0 16) 0 Provide spot elevations along drainage flow lines that show a minimum slope of 1 % for earth or rock o Maintain existing drainage patterns for flows entering and exiting the site o Label permanent erosion control methods at runoff discharge locations 0 Indicate wall openings (size & spacing) for surface drainage, label permanent erosion control measures for outlets of wall openings 0 Provide toe and top of wall elevations on plan view 0 Provide retaining wall calculations with schedule & details (2 sets bound, stamped) 0 Show retaining wall detail and schedule on grading plan or structural detail sheet 0 17) 0 Use a distinct line delineating the area to be graded, which includes all disturbed areas o Allow grading runout for cut and fill slopes o Grading area exceeds the maximum Grading Limit per Final Plat — adjust Grading Limits o Allow for disturbance area for construction vehicles when delineating Grading Limits o Allow for natural buffer between disturbance area and edge of property o Dimension distances between Grading Limits and Property Lines o Provide construction layout dimensions 0 18) o Clarify grading design by providing a section cut on Grading Plan: 0 on a line perpendicular to slope o label finish floor elevations of all structures o show existing elevations 0 for retaining wall o label proposed building heights o label proposed elevations or grades o section must extend through proposed structure and beyond Grading Limits to natural slopes 0 19) o Describe permanent erosion control measures for roof drainage; describe placement of riprap aprons or splash blocks at base of down spouts, scuppers, canales, etc. o Show / label the locations of roof drains on the Grading Plan using keynotes or other symbols 0 20) o Provide interim (temporary) erosion control methods and show on Grading Plan o Interim erosion control devices must be placed within Grading Limits o Using delineating lines or symbols, show the extent of silt fence or straw bales and label lengths o Add a detail and note(s) for clarification of temporary erosion control device installation o ADEQ Notice Of Intent (N.O.I.) for disturbance of one (1) acre or greater 21) o Provide Hydrology analysis o Provide Q100 for channel o Provide channel design calculations o Provide WSEL's(Water Surface elevations) o Submit hydraulic calculations for culvert o Show culvert size length & slope o Invert elevations required at culvert openings 0 o Provide scour protection Subdivision Address Final Plat: Bk pg Contact TYPE 1 GRADING PERMIT CHECKLIST sheet OV / Parcel # Phone B 0 5 0 0 G 0 5 0 0 Lot # ❑ Date Fax PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CIRCLED ITEMS: 1) o Add Town of Oro Valley general notes to Grading Plan, see attached. o Revise Town of Oro Valley General Note #7 phone 229-4800. Check spelling. 2) o Label the plan "GRADING / SITE PLAN" o Submit all Grading information on one sheet only 3) o Fill out Grading Statement on top half of second page of Building Permit Application 4) o Provide a soils report. Cut and fill slopes must conform to slope recommendations of soils report o Submit addendum to soils report from the geotechnical company o Note: maximum steepness of proposed slopes allowed: CUT: :1 (H:V) and FILL: :1 (H:V) o Soils Report must include recommendations for building foundation, slope grades & slope treatments 0 5) 0 Check Final Plat for compliance of Final Plat General Notes o Add General Notes # 0 to the Grading Plan, see attached 6) 0 Submit 3 bluelines or blacklines of the revised Grading Plan o The Grading Plan must be drawn to the following scales: 1"=20' or 1" = 10' o Add north arrow 7) o Grading Plans shall be prepared by a State of Arizona Registrant, for the following conditions: o 15% or greater slopes o Average cross -slope of building pad region is greater than 6% o Delineate existing sloped areas of 25% or greater o Provide average cross -slope calculations 0 8) o Grading Plans shall include existing topography on 1 or 2 foot contour intervals o Benchmark/topo must be prepared by a Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor registered in the State of Arizona o Grading Plan must be tied to a recognized benchmark of known elevation and location o Identify and show location of benchmark, state benchmark elevation on Grading Plan o Submit a 24" x 36" blueline or blackline copy of the Tentative / Preliminary Plat for topo verification or one copy of separate topo (stamped by RLS) may be submitted 0 Show existing grading or spot elevations at primary corners of all structures 0 10:00 a.m. OV12-05-01, Pre -Hearing Review for DRB, Alpha Engineering, representing Cape Coral Land Co., requests approval of a Master Development Plan for a commercial center, located in proximity to the southeast corner of Oracle Road and Hardy Road, directly south of the Circle K, Parcel 225-14-166B Date Transmitted: November 17, 2005 Project Leader: David Ronquillo, dronquillona,orovalley.net Written Comments Due: December 9, 2005 (Send to Development Coordinator: sgay( ,orovalle�nett) 10:10 a.m. OV12-03-16B, Pre -Hearing Review for DRB, Evergreen Devco Inc., representing Steam Pump Village Development, requests approval of a Preliminary Plat for the entire 41 acres of the site, located at the intersection of Oracle Road and Hanley Boulevard on the west side of Oracle Road, Parcel 220-08-001 Date Transmitted: November 17, 2005 Project Leader: David Ronquillo, donquillo orovalley.net Written Comments Due: December 9, 2005 (Send to Development Coordinator: sgay(Rorovalley.net) 10:20 a.m. OV 12-04-26, Pre -Hearing Review for DRB, MMLA Psomas, representing Electronic Communities, requests approval of a Preliminary Plat for an 81 lot subdivision, located within the La Reserve Planned Area Development at the end of Pusch Wilderness Drive (past the bridge), Parcel 220-11-002W Date Transmitted: November 30, 2005 Project Leader: David Ronquillo, dronquillo(a,orovalley.net Written Comments Due: December 9, 2005 (Send to Development Coordinator: s ay(a�,orovalley.net) 10:30 a.m.L_�90pper 12-OS-31, re -Hearing Review for DRB, MMLA Psomas, representing Canyon Development, requests approval of a Preliminary Plat for 21 single-family lots known as Red Rock Ridge, located south of Tangerine Road and east of Vista del Sol, Parcels 224-11-019B-F Date Transmitted: November 17, 2005 Project Leader: Andreas Molin, amolin ,orovalley.net Written Comments Due: December 9, 2005 (Send to Development Coordinator: sgay@orovalley.net) 10:40 a.m. Z;e;a 23Pre-Hearing Review for DRB, Sakellar Associates, representing state, requests approval of a Development Plan for two commercial buildings on 3.25 acres, located east of Oracle Road and southwest of north Rams Field Pass, Parcels 220-04-01OM and a portion of 220-04-01 OJ Date Transmitted: November 17, 2005 Project Leader: Andreas Molin, amolinaorovalley.net Written Comments Due: December 9, 2005 (Send to Development Coordinator: sgay(iOrovalley.net) 10:50 a.m. Adjourn SUN CITY VISTOSO PET PARTNERS CLUB (SCVPPC) SCVPPC DOG PARK (PROPOSED) ABOUT DOG PARKS POLICIES & PROCEDURES REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCESS AND APPLICATION RULES, USER AGREEMENT & UNCONDITIONAL RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS PUBLIC NOTICE 3 ABOUT DOG PARKS draft 8/9/05 Taking your dog to a dog park to socialize with other dogs can be a very enjoyable experience for both dog and owner! Your dog gets needed exercise and an opportunity to play with other dogs. As the dog owner, you can enjoy the benefits of socializing with other dog owners while knowing that your dog is in a secure environment suited especially for him. Dog's with suitable temperaments running naturally off leash can further define their personalities for owners -- and at the same time, provide considerable entertainment for dog and owners alike! If your dog is generally RELIABLE, CONTROLLABLE, PREDICTABLE, OUTGOING and FRIENDLY around other people and other dogs, he may enjoy a dog park. Not all dogs do enjoy cavorting with unfamiliar dogs, their personalities differ. What is fun for one dog may stress another. Non -neutered male dogs and aggressive dogs do not belong in a dog park. L! POLICIES & PROCEDURES THE SCVPPC DOG PARK SHALL BE MANAGED AND FINANCED BY THE THE SCV PET PARTNER CLUB (SCVPPC) ACCORDING TO THE FOLLOWING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES APPROVED BY DUES PAYING MEMBERS OF THE CLUB. POLICIES 1. PARK ACCESS WILL BE FOR SCVPPC DUES PAYING MEMBERS ONLY. 2. ACCESS APPROVAL WILL BE GRANTED WHEN ALL REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN SATISFIED. (SEE PROCEDURES) 2. ACCESS WILL BE BY KEYED ENTRY ISSUED ONLY TO CLUB MEMBERS WHO HAVE BEEN GRANTED ACCESS. 3. THE PARK SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN GOOD REPAIR AND KEPT CLEAN AT ALL TIMES. 4. PLASTIC BAGS FOR FECES COLLECTION WILL BE SUPPLIED IN AN APPROPRIATE DISPENSER. 5. A PROPER RECEPTACLE FOR FECES COLLECTION WILL BE PLACED AT ENTRY TO PARK FOR REGULAR SCHEDULED TRASH PICKUP. 6. A SIGN SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT THE ENTRY GATE STATING PARK RULES AND WHO TO CONTACT FOR ACCESS OR WHO TO NOTIFY IN CASE OF VIOLATIONS. 7. RULES WILL BE ENFORCED BY ALL USERS OF THE PARK AND SCVPPC. VIOLATIONS MAY BE CAUSE FOR LOSS OF PARK ACCESS. PROCEDURES/REQUIREMENTS FOR DOG PARK ACCESS 1. Must be current member(s) of SCVPPC with a current member number. 2. Must be owner(s) of dog(s) using the park 3. Must provide a copy of dog owner's Home Owners Insurance Policy. 4. Provide a copy(s) of CURRENT (specified in application) Immunization Record of dog(s) using park. 5 5. Must complete and SIGN the following documents APPLICATION DOG PARK PULES & USER AGREEMENT (for quick reference copies of both documents follow - see separate documents in next two sections of packet) REQUIREMENTS FOR DOG PARK ACCESS AND APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS Must be current dues paying member (s) of the SCV Dog Club Must be owner(s) of dog(s) using the park Must complete and sign the following documents: Application Dog Park Rules & User Agreement Provide a copy of dog owner's Home Owners Insurance Policy Provide a copy(s) of CURRENT Dog License & Rabies Vaccination Certificate Provide a copy(s) of CURRENT Immunization Record from dog's Veterinarian to include the following immunizations: DA2PP (Distemper, Adenovirus, Parainfluenza, Parvo & Bordetella ( Kennel Cough) APPLICATION SCVPPC Member Number Name: Address: Tel: E-mail Name of Dog; Breed: Weight: 1.1 (if registering a second dog) Name of Dog: Breed: Weight: signature(s) of dog's owner(s) date Attach Copies of Dog License & Rabies Vaccination Certificate & Immunization Record Dog owner's Home Owners Insurance Policy DOG PARK RULES & USER AGREEMENT 1. Access for members only of SCVPPC and dog's owner - handier. 2. Dog Park will be open during daylight hours only. 3. Dogs must be leashed at all times when outside the dog park. 4. Dogs must have a current dog license and wear a current rabies tag and owner identification. Dogs must wear a buckle or flat collar at all times. (no choke collars) 5. A copy of dog's current immunizations must be on file with SCVPPC. Immunizations required: DA2PP (Distemper, Adenovirus, Parainfluenza, Parvo) & Bordetella ( Kennel Cough) 6. On entry, outside gate must be closed and the dog unleashed before the Inside gate is opened. 7. Owners must carry a leash at all times. 8. Dogs must be in view and supervised at all times. 9. Aggressive or excessively barking or yelping dogs must be removed immediately. 10. Dogs that are ill or in heat and non -neutered male dogs are prohibited. 11. No puppies under 6 months of age allowed. 12. No food, alcohol, smoking or dog toys allowed in the park. 13. No children under the age of 16 allowed in the park 14. Feces must br picked up immediately and placed in proper receptacle. 15. No more than two dogs per owner per visit. 16. Park is wheelchair accessible but a second owner -handler must accompany the person in the wheelchair. ACCESS FOR LARGE & SMALL DOGS SHALL BE ON ALTERNATE DAYS Park management and enforcement of rules shall be the responsibility of SCVPPC. To report violations or problems or to apply for access to the park contact the following: I have read, understand and agree to comply fully with the SCVPPC DOG PARK RULES. signature of dog owner date In consideration of the benefits derived from my use of this off -leash facility and In accordance with Arizona law and statutes you hereby agree to assume all risks inherent in the use of this facility and release the Sun City Vistoso community Association from any damage claims arising by reason of your use of this facility, including damages and injury caused by the acts of other users and their animals. (dogs) re: Tucson Code Section 4-102 (disposal of solid waste) and Arizona Revised Statute 11-1025 (Liability for dog bites) signature of dog owner date ! i 'FA At, All '`.�y - �.., O , ` '{xis '�., % � emu v.. i U-, f 00 10 i IMP PK .7. 10- PtAs :N\ m imp AV_ q2- 19 ot. Ao OTN Aml'-q! IW Q. k UNIT 14 13 494bL,F cc uRsr E ao6 PAR K . c6ms HOLEs 4 A 5 Is, C ITY Vjs7oso PROP05kD DOG PAIZI< -QWG, A-1 SITE PLAN r 5CA L ti - 11400f6o' A W. -'Cs 1 I �Yfr„•• Cv Tc91JE r , pA%vt t JG k4 c ' �, ,FE KCEA AREA !, \ PROP05 ) DOG PAR14,� `-` VrR'rl AL RAILROAD t3�d"KL�oNTRyTIES =o" C.C. ti WITja 4=O'GA-M5 8 '� A e: A ,p r y I \ t 1 \ X EWDIE D PA;U< % Ar,- 1F REdUTAEV,., m 1t/ SUN CITY' VIST6SO PROPOSED DOG PAR k' DWo A-2 PARi<, LA\/c7U7 N t �sjg-r. h Y7 f"�eti>rY s �� ►�1�" it�tV Sr: t �. -+- .N eA jrW t.S`��,,,t t4_ f. �i •+s�,.t��. jj, �����" 11't� �.Y �1 h''A� R ty' � ; •."L ,`� �'i �. a•',� (�',]t.�NY'.',1'� ti �fi�?+y"y ja{ . **� '-.r-4� �t ♦ �.'"` ��tii�,�s rth•� yq SY ♦.!`��fA Rb�: ..X.Y.+ if�Y.[tiJ. i /ram`•• 1• y�' fv}�- �aJ �, ,i r ` >* � ssy +t,l • ".' f"'s`�' ir9r 3 �!`; a�wsyt't "'}+�,�r�fr.�' ��,�Y �3�;�1,4,fy���'f?,�•4rr •hd �r,��.; �j f V �k' • l Fir �, � •a �� `,,,, �, its w J r �� �.Mic �t�•.:', t�..tiyi'�'.,�.t �Y.\:.-.•":;.11�a' i��:t:f.,. f, lFa fib'!`* . j:: A�.�r���-ft�9M': � ... '•m .at i".�NPY S4TC 711 y"'�.ac� R. e 0 4 I 4�flPW +% � � � a +r .'a�1 r + 'R#1 a � �� � s$ T R a► q�,,'�.3 ' �' ', � - #`- * !�' !R AV OQ �U04 a n a yM * �!^., "--l� 4 '� i" i .M .*1!'k ,+'.w ,. !■ t.�-'s'3 ;+4r * �1"' r k , § Y dd k • 1� !i 1 x a .1 P. y d ° T e.Va n � �..'k � �•L ��f. F 6 Fa �yr +t*'MI J 'r vk e g yA� a • I � aG �, • gg � 1 Ad ` 4 ; � � v _.Ati� rd� 1 .`may,. C:, • .,.. . ayi K 77 - C V .' i-a.. 3 Nk Pi 4dl dr top %f 7„ o' ylY loi 44 44 Al Ak { x �, w. Oyu Y �� ,R.,. - ►' �'�M � §Ir • y q. A " y a ll �p;. ., Sal �! �j �T', r r #'"yam. ., i■'^' .r p IY, }y.. ,1 . j1 {ij• s R■' M yMg �,!! v ,x■;' y N ?e f y A P --,Coo !F� lyr�,'m !a jllsi �'! M 16 le * • `l► ..a a, q �} ko OF -{ k c r Fido's Dog Park I Fido's Dog Park IP Legend PAD Land Use Designations= Ana ASubAm*4 61 Commercial =Open Space TZ-1 VLDR DSGNATION O Area B n 0-2 M Golf/ R- 1= PAD TZ-1" Mash Are. C CB-2 HDR RF TZ-4 15-25% slope A Area D CI Hospftal Residential TZ-5 = .:A .b..I Area E C CPI LDR Resort TZ-CR1 25%+ slope J—A-Mm.2 CI Are. F CR-2 MDR SR TZ-TR Area A SubAma3 Am. G CR-5 MHDR TR TZ3 60 O Feet Fido's Dog Park Legend PAD Land Use Designations ! A SubAmaa C-1 Commercial [ open Space = TZ-1 a VLDR DSGNATION !, �_ Area B C-2 - Gcif/ Rec PAD TZ-144 © Wash 1 1 : Area C CB-2 HDR RF TZ1 s 15-25% slope [ ^ 1. A Area D CI Hospital ResiEenbal LJ TZ-5 twa ASubAreei Area E CPI LDR ResoK TZ-CB1 6D - 25%+ slope Arne A SubAraa2 Area F CR-2 MDR SR TZ-TR Feet !�� Area A SubArea3 'i._ _AreaG CRS MHDR TR T23 r ,3[ Bend -ABoard Tm Plasic Header Board .10 Nhr y� , i :t Hybrid Bermuda G ol t; •.., „� / 'Y.H. \:.., •,, /ram\,,,..... ; 1. -• -, � ^..• '''/",•_•-:�.,� �`'+,^ \ , \,\ 4 tii{§ti` Pik EV IV w. ,/ r •.' %,� : � I��� �, She '� �\ ••�, i C~ w, £ `'`_„ t ice` 1 � �,. \ , -� i ti ` E : t �� � 4. �-..:....sr'•-/ ~, ;� 1 ,...:: f t [ lM L,\\.• C o i ► ,\ ii {ist 1 T 1 i i f i ,t t, ( t\ f i / ,it t \ 1 \ f i t cam'`• i A ' /,., , / r` \ , \ z •r •sl fj/ t f •i e 4• t: • i. , \ t „ i M i z T �pical Tee Mail- 0 Plan View NON Nt Bend-A•Board Tm BendABoard N Plastic Header Board Plastic Header Board Fairway/ Green j j�� < RO Turf to be Removed Existing Desert to be Deveged ° All Tees are to be stripped, leveled and re -grassed. All Tees Complexes where turf has been removed are to be planted with barrel cactus, agave, yucca, hesperaloe or prickly pear at a rate Of 4/ 1000 square feet. See TU4 for additional details. 30-40' ,Hybrid Bermuda Sod 3:1 Slope (Max) / t ff}f a 4 Sand Y P j�slectieDetalcaldroon• f• ,, ,:,,, t 1 , ;r fd J 1 1 /• i otal aTotal Ta ASBuit (cres Removed es Total a Pro o d cres a���EnhancementtHole Dev (acres) i. ft.) 1 3.33 0.27 3.06 .39 4500 2 5.24 0.51 4.73 .50 6000 3 1.57 0.25 1.32 .58 3500 4 5.13 0.51 4.62 .50 0 5 6.06 1.01 5.05 .32 8000 6 5.26 1.06 4.20 .09 6500 7 1.82 0.60 1.22 .19 7500 8 4.38 0.38 4.00 1.02 0 9 4.07 0.62 3.45 .54 10500 Front 9 36.86 5.21 31.65 4.13 46,500 10 5.28 0.32 4.96 .59 13500 11 5.27 I 0.37 4.90 .99 0 12 1.24 0.24 1.00 .40 5500 13 3.96 0.00 3.96 .42 0 14 4.73 0.30 4.43 1.11 0 15 3.28 0.00 3.28 .76 0 16 5.87 8 0.78 5.09 .35 6000 17 2.20 0.73 1.47 .03 12000 18 3.50 0.76 2.74 .42 11000 Back 9 35.33 3.50 31.83 5.07 48,000 PR/ PG 5.52 1.39 4.13 .00 14,900 TOTAL 77.71 10.10 67.61 9.20 109,400 f 1 w z �.. �, s •; t,.7 I Tee \ i' Rem Tee t ` e ' Rey ►tf ,;f 4 t: i� See 1