Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
OV90702A
LEWIS ROCA LLP LAWYERS Mary Beth Savel One South Church Avenue Suite 700 Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 VIA E-MAIL and FIRST CLASS MAIL September 28, 2007 Sarah S. More, FAICP Planning & Zoning Administrator Town of Oro Valley 11000 North La Canada Drive Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 Direct Dial: (52o) 629-4418 Direct Fax: (52o) 879-4724 MSavel@LRLaw.com Admitted in: Arizona Our File Number: 46509-00002 OCT 2 2007 Re: Transwest Partners; Rezoning Case No. OV9-07-02A; modification of rezoning request Dear Sarah: As you know, Lewis and Roca LLP represents Transwest Partners ("Transwest") in connection with a rezoning in Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 3 for a proposed new multi- story Embassy Suites hotel. The rezoning request as considered by the Oro Valley Planning and Zoning Commission included the addition of a "hotel" use to the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development, Neighborhood 3 area (CPI uses), a request to permit a 6-story, 75-foot height for the proposed hotel, and a request for modification of the Tangerine Road Overlay Zone to permit a 3:1 building setback. After considerable input from the Mayor and Town Council, the Planning and Zoning Commission, and the community, and after extensive redesign and consideration of multiple planning options by Transwest and its franchisor, Hilton Hotels, Transwest has achieved a hotel design that eliminates approximately 51 rooms, reduces the building height to 5-stories, 60-feet, and meets the Tangerine Road Overlay Zone 4:1 building to road setback. The additional land area gained by this site redesign will allow Transwest to provide more extensive landscaping and connectivity with the adjacent Neighborhood 3 linear park/trail system. On September 14, 2007, Transwest's planning consultant, Bob Conant, delivered a revised site plan to the Town which depicts the 5-story hotel in compliance with the 4:1 building setback. This letter confirms that Transwest will propose to the Mayor and Town Council at the upcoming October 17, 2007 public meeting that the rezoning request be limited to the following: * Addition of "hotel" uses to the Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 3 CPI zone list of allowable uses; and * Authorization of a 5-story, 60-foot maximum height for the Transwest parcel only. 227101.1 PHOENIX e TUCSON • LAS VEGAS • RENO www.lewisandroca.com • ALBUQUERQUE LEWIS Sarah S. More, FAICP AND September 28, 2007 RO CA Page 2 LLP LAWYERS Please contact me if you have any questions about this letter. Sincerely, Mary Beth Savel J MBS/sdl cc: Mayor Paul Loomis, Town of Oro Valley Ms. Jerene Watson, Assistant Town Manager Mr. David W. Welsh, Economic Development Administrator Joseph N. Andrews, Esq., Town Attorney's Office Mr. Joshua T. Westling, Transwest Partners Mr. Robert Conant, Jr., The Planning Center (All via email) 227101.1 'wWW,aA, ORO VALLEY-,, r1RILO\A NCH CORPORATION r µ _ HOTEL PLAZA EMBASSY SUITES INNOVNI'ION PARK SITE FLAN ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA 2007.-3 1 ® 0' 3�0' I EMBASSY SUITES SITE 11-91 EMBASSY SUITES HOTELS• HOTEL PLAZA EMBASSY SUITES ORO VALLEY, MIZOM SITE PLAN NOM m a so 1tp 2so KiR9YE 1ti>trd PROJECT DATA 1ST ROOK M ROOM 2ND FLOOR 43 ROOMS 3W FLOOR W ROOMS 4m FLOOR N ROOMS SFH FLOOR 36 ROOMS TOTAL 244 ROOMS GtBT PARKING 344.1 PER ROOM STAFF PARKING 20 .1 PER 2 IMMOYIE13 PARKING SPAS RBQURtED 264 SPARS PARKING SPADES MOVD® M SPAM PATH LINKED TO--,,, PROPOSED PARK �Q 4" E:, 11 1 � t -41 KITCHEN • it • ESTAURANT - * i POOL 11 mono LANDSCAPE BUFFER -� N DATE 09.0707 O O PROPERTY LINE / RIGHT-OF-WAY F Kv W APPROXIMATE EDGE OF ROADWAY N" - 7 SETBACK FOR 60'-0' HEIGHT 5 STORY RAMADA R-ns.oa A-6913'24" L-211.43 ■■I ROAD - - - - - - - - - - - - - F HOTEL PLAZA EMBASSY SUITES ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA i LPROPERTY EXISTIN TANGERINE ROAD GRADE i 4'-0' 5h--- --2nd ❑❑❑ t---- ze$4,Sz 16.-o L B SITE SECTION AT LOBBY - 5 STORY kjj-r-w-ff PROPERTY LINE EXISTING GRADE �--- Im'-m' 4th — -- — ist SITE SECTION AT SUITES - 5 STORY 2 r - ao'-' RESTAURANT COCHERE Dan w-M GRADE GRADE GRADE GRADE HOTEL PLAZ EMBASSY SUIE'� ORO VALLEY, ARIZONK z F-9 9 1.. 4 IN 1 9 1-19 47 9 21 (- 11 6 9 NDSCAFE 5U--PFER v N 9 9 sl EDGE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY 1 m /-CONSTRUCTED RIGHT-OF-WAY R-175.00 A-69`I3'24' L-211.43 9 9 9 9 9 1 TAWr.FRlNF ROAD — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — NORTHSITE PLAN PROJECT Sl> 6 STORY AT 75'W HEIGHT TOTAL ROOMS PROVIDED = 290 ROOMS 1 100 250 TOTAL/ •S PROVIDED 7D MS I- L- -- HOTEL PLAZA EMBASSY SUITES SITE PLAN ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA may 10, 2007 8 __ ___._ TANGERINE ROAD. HOTEL PLAZA EMBASSY SUITES ENLARGED SITE PLAN ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA mac 10, Mr SITE PLAN s en ipp � AV' I analysis images I thru 8 on adjacent pages HOTEL PLAZA EMBASSY SUITES IM VIEWSHED ANALYSIS MAP ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA F M It ASS Y 8 Ll IT ES " 0 T E L S * " HOTEL PLAZA EMBASSY SUITES VIEWSHED ANALYSIS ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA EMBASSY S U I T F S HOTELS" Sept. 12, 200 HOTEL PLAZA EMBASSY SUITES VIEWSHED ANALYSIS ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA E EMBASSY SUITES HOTELS' lg, M1.2111, A� Al HOTEL PLAZA EMBASSY SUITES VIEWSHED ANALYSIS ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA EM HASSY SUITES HOTELS" HOTEL PLAZA EMBASSY SUITES SITE _SECTION ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA may 10, 20 , HOTEL PLAZA EMBASSY SUITES VIEW FROM TANGERINE ROAD ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA a— J O, 2na7 r. CD CYS 12- v. LLJ C-0 c:) . . ......... 3 Ar T E PLAN NORTH aD 1/0 RUM r/l/E/EffIffIffM 0 so 100 250 z 0 SCALE r= 40'-0' 0 PROJECT DATA 1ST FLOOR 31 ROOMS 2ND FLOOR 43 ROOMS 3RD FLOOR 58 ROOMS 4TH FLOOR 56 ROOMS STH FLOOR 56 ROOMS TOTAL 244 ROOMS GUEST PARKING 244 0 1 PER ROOM STAFF PARKING 20 a 1 PER 2 EMPLOYEES PARKING SPACES REQUIRED 264 SPACES PARKING SPACES PROVIDED 269 SPACES FATH LiN<E[D TO--� # EAGER 0 FIA, logmu r on== 9 smvxx AUA 3 E: W 7OF �w Lu E: L-j OBBY 0 Q, G-1 0 POOL ( RA S7P ,5,38.9,3 CN z 0 TMGERINE ROAD 9 SETE34C< POF� �o'_O` HEIGHT 5 5 T 0 fR� �S7 vo 5 R=1 75.00 z�= 6 9'13'24" A\L= 211.43 4 9 1 cf)rn co 9,1 (A awhQ' THE PLANNII�ENTER 7) a division of TPC Group, Inc. June 26, 2006 Sarah More, FAICP Planning and Zoning Director Town of Oro Valley 11000 North La Canada Drive Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 2 8 <pQ RE: OV9-07-02A Hotel Plaza, Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 3 Dear Sarah: The application referenced above is an addendum to our application OV9-07-02, which the Planning and Zoning Commission heard at its regular meeting of April 3, 2007. The issue adjudicated by the Planning and Zoning Commission on April 3, 2007, was to add Hotel to the list of permitted uses in TP Rancho Vistoso and to permit a building height of 75 feet. The Commission recommended approval of adding Hotel to the permitted uses, but recommended denial of the 75 foot building height. The case has not been heard by the Mayor and Council as yet, at the request of the applicant, pending the decision of the Commission on the above referenced addendum application. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at 623-6146 or bconant@azplanningcenter.com. Very tnily yours, Robert M. Conant, Jr. Project Manager a 110 s church ste 6320 tucson az 85701 0 520.623.6146 f 520.622.1950 w a zplanningcenter.com Town Council Page 1 of 14 MINUTES ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION October 17, 2007 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 5:30 PM CALL TO ORDER - 5:30 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Paul Loomis, Mayor Helen Dankwerth, Vice Mayor Paula Abbott, Council Member K.C. Carter, Council Member Barry Gillaspie, Council Member Al Kunisch, Council Member Terry Parish, Council Member EXECUTIVE SESSION AT OR AFTER 5:30 PM MOTION: A motion was made by Vice Mayor Dankwerth and seconded by Council Member Kunisch to go into Executive Session at 5:30 p.m. for the following purpose: Pursuant to ARS 38-431.03(A)(1), discussion and consideration of applicants for the Town Attorney position, Council may vote to meet in Executive Session with management staff regarding this matter Mayor Loomis announced that in addition to the Town Council, the Town Manager, the Assistant Town Manager and the Town Clerk, Chief Civil Deputy Attorney Joe Andrews and Human Resource Director Sandra Abbey would also be present in Executive Session. MOTION carried, 7-0. MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Parish and seconded by Council Member Carter to go out of Executive Session at 6:17 p.m. MOTION carried, 7-0. http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=2&clip_id=161 12/07/2007 . Town Council Page 2 of 14 RESUME REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Paul Loomis, Mayor Helen Dankwerth, Vice Mayor Paula Abbott, Council Member K.C. Carter, Council Member Barry Gillaspie, Council Member Al Kunisch, Council Member Terry Parish, Council Member PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Loomis invited the Boy Scout troop that was in attendance to lead the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. Mayor Loomis asked for a moment of silence in honor of James Kriegh, Town Founding Father and Town Historian, who passed away last week. UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS Town Manager David Andrews reviewed the upcoming meetings and events. COUNCIL REPORTS - No reports. DEPARTMENT REPORTS - No reports. TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT Town Manager David Andrews announced that a Homeowner's Association (HOA) forum was held on Tuesday with approximately 30 participants in attendance. He thanked the Town staff for their participation and work in putting the forum together. He further announced that he and Communication Administrator Mary Davis and Town Engineer Craig Civalier were invited by the Town of Marana to participate in a teleconference call with Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords to discuss the proposed changes to the floodplain maps by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=2&clip_id=161 12/07/2007 . Town Council Page 3 of 14 ORDER OF BUSINESS: MAYOR WILL REVIEW THE ORDER OF THE MEETING CALL TO AUDIENCE - Zev Cywan, Town resident, commented on a Development Review Board meeting item that had been previously denied and what he perceived as questionable actions by Town staff and Council. Joe Hornat, Town resident, questioned the assignment of police officers to a special Task Force and asked how this would relate to the Budget. Jerry Bustamante, Northern Pima County Chamber of Commerce, commented regarding the vacating of the Economic Development Administrator's position by Mr. David Welsh. He stated that the Chamber members hoped that the Town appointed someone of an equal caliber of Mr. Welsh. He further stated that in order to attract qualified candidates, the applicants need to know that the entire Council supports the position. PRESENTATIONS Presentation by Drs. Robert and Debbie Oro of Oro Dental Medicine on making Oro Valley the healthiest town in America Doctors Robert and Debbie Oro, Town residents, commented on health and healthcare in Oro Valley and on making it a high priority in the Town. They asked the community to join in their "circle of care" and not gain weight for one year and to track their daily activity by wearing a pedometer. They also asked that if Council sees fit, that a strategic planning meeting be set up to help make Oro Valley "the healthiest town in America". Presentation and Update of Oro Valley Marketplace's Tenants Economic Development Director David Welsh updated the Town Council on the businesses that have been confirmed as tenants at the Oro Valley Marketplace which will be opening in late 2008-2009. Presentation of Golder Ranch Fire District 2007 Annexation Update by Fire Chief John Fink Fire Chief John Fink introduced Chief John Sullivan who presented an update on the fire district annexations in Oro Valley. Chief http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=2&clip_id=161 12/07/2007 . Town Council Page 4 of 14 Sullivan reviewed the annexation phases and cost comparisons and stated that they are about 1 1/2 years ahead of their original schedule. CONSENT AGENDA At the request of Council, Mayor Loomis pulled Items A, G, H, I and,J, and N. MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Kunisch and seconded by Vice Mayor Dankwerth to approve the Consent Agenda with the exception of Items A, G, H, I, J and N. MOTION carried, 7-0. A. Minutes - 09/19/07, 09/26/07 (PULLED FOR DISCUSSION) MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Gillaspie and seconded by Council Member Parish to approve the 9/19/07 minutes as corrected and to approve the 9/26/07 minutes. MOTION carried, 7-0. B. Resolution No. (R)07 - 111 Designating the Town of Oro Valley regular spring election dates: March 11, 2008 Primary and May 20, 2008 General Elections; Designating the deadline for voter registration; and designating the place and the last date for candidates to file nomination papers C. Resolution No. (R)07- 112 Authorizing the Town Clerk to conduct the 2008 Spring Elections By Mail pursuant to ARS 16-409 on March 11, 2008 and May 20, 2008 D. Resolution No. (R)07- 113 Approving the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA) Grant Agreement (#HT17-07-1712) between the Arizona Criminal Justice Commission (ACJC) and the Town of Oro Valley, allowing for two (2) officers to be assigned to the Pima County / Tucson Metropolitan Counter Narcotics Alliance (CNA) E. Resolution No. (R) 07- 114 Approving the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA) Grant Agreement (#HT17-07-1610) between the Arizona Criminal Justice Commission (ACJC) and the Town of Oro Valley, Allowing for one (1) officer to be assigned to the Pima County HIDTA Investigative Task Force (PCHITF) F. Resolution No. (R)07- 115 Authorizing the Town to enter into an http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=2&clip_id=161 12/07/2007 , Town Council Page 5 of 14 Intergovernmental Agreement with the Regional Transportation Authority of Pima County for construction funds in the amount of $670,000 for the Glover Road/La Cholla Boulevard Intersection Improvement, Project No. OV 30 04/05 03 G. Resolution No. (R)07- 116 Approving a perpetual lease in the amount of $128,066.00 to use an additional 100 feet of right-of-way on the south side of, and adjacent to, the existing Tangerine Road right-of- way east of La Cholla Boulevard (PULLED FOR DISCUSSION) MOTION: A motion was made by Mayor Loomis and seconded by Council Member Gillaspie to approve Resolution (R)07-116 approving a perpetual lease with a one-time payment in the amount of $128,066.00 to be funded by the Pima Association of Governments Federal Surface Transportation Program to use an additional 100-feet of right-of-way on the south side of and adjacent to the existing Tangerine Road right-of-way west of La Cholla Boulevard. MOTION carried, 7-0. H. Resolution (R) 07 - 117 Approving Marketing Intelligence to conduct a Community Survey and authorizing the Town Manager to execute the contract with Marketing Intelligence in the amount of $17,800.00 (PULLED FOR DISCUSSION) Council Member Abbott requested that questions relating to the undergrounding of utility lines be included in the Community Survey questions. MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Parish and seconded by Council Member Kunisch to approve Resolution (R)07- 117. MOTION carried, 7-0. OV12-03-09 Approval of a final plat for Villa Milagro, 28 lots in the single-family subdivision and a portion of two office buildings located west of Oracle Road and north of Desert Sky Road (PULLED FOR DISCUSSION) Mayor Loomis opened the floor for public comment. James Malliet, Town resident, expressed concerns regarding the project's density, increased traffic onto Oracle Road, stormwater run- off, dust and noise from the building, light pollution from the new office http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view id=2&clip_id=161 12/07/2007 , Town Council Page 6 of 14 buildings, and the elevation of the buildings. Discussion followed regarding the zoning (R-6 Multi -family residential), design guidelines requiring variations in building heights, safety concerns with cross -access roads and the single ingress/egress, a grading exception and rezoning were previously denied which prevents an additional access from being built, one access point is adequate for the number of trips generated by the project and working with the two property owners on creating a second access point. MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Parish and seconded by Vice Mayor Dankwerth to CONTINUE Item I, Final Plat for Villa Milagro, to the next Council meeting (November 7th or the meeting after) with direction to staff to get additional information on an additional access roadway and if necessary, the history on the original approval regarding any extra conditions that may have been added to the plat. MOTION carried, 7-0. J. Appointment of Richard Davis to the Oro Valley Water Utility Commission with term effective October 17, 2007 through June 30, 2010 (PULLED FOR DISCUSSION) MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Gillaspie and seconded by Council Member Abbott to appoint Richard Davis to the Oro Valley Water Utility Commission with term effective October 17, 2007 through June 30, 2010. MOTION carried, 7-0. K. Appointment of the following citizens to the Historic Preservation Commission - Lois Nagy with term effective October 17, 2007 through June 30, 2009 and Daniel Zweiner with term effective October 17, 2007 through June 2008 L. Update on Town of Oro Valley Economic Development Agreements M. Economic Development Division Monthly Report - September 2007 N. Resolution No. (R)07-118 - Declaring that certain document entitled "Storm Water Utility Fee System", Chapter 15, of the Oro Valley Town Code at Section 15-24-13 and filed with the Town Clerk, a public record (PULLED FOR DISCUSSION) http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=2&clip_id=161 12/07/2007 , Town Council Page 7 of 14 Council Member Parish expressed his opposition to approval of the Storm Water Utility Fee System. MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Parish to Deny Item N. Motion failed due to lack of Second. MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Carter and seconded by Vice Mayor Dankwerth to adopt Item N, Resolution (R) 07-118. MOTION carried, 6-1 with Council Member Parish opposed. Mayor Loomis recessed the meeting at 8:06 p.m. The meeting resumed at 8:13 p.m. 2. CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING COUNCIL POLICY #4 UPDATE - TOWN OF ORO VALLEY MEETING FACILITIES USAGE POLICY (Continued from October 3, 2007) Town Clerk Kathryn Cuvelier reviewed the proposed changes to the Meeting Facilities Usage policy. Discussion followed regarding the refundable security deposit, compliance with the terms of the Pima County Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA), damage enforcement, protecting the public's interests, liability insurance, separating the use of the Library from other Town facilities, user groups and monthly usage. MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Parish and seconded by Council Member Kunisch to amend Council Policy #4 effective November 17, 2007, including a refundable $200.00 security deposit for the Oro Valley Public Library. MOTION carried, 4-3 with Council Member Abbott, Council Member Carter, and Council Member Gillaspie opposed. 3. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. (0)07- 39 AMENDING THE PERMITTED USES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR THE CAMPUS PARK INDUSTRIAL (CPI) LAND USE DISTRICT WITHIN THE RANCHO VISTOSO PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT (PAD) TO ADD HOTELS TO THE PERMITTED USES AND ALLOW FOR A MAXIMUM HEIGHT FOR A PROPOSED HOTEL UP TO 60 FEET Explanation: The applicant has revised the requested PAD amendments to limit its applicability to a single site and has reduced the proposed hotel http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=2&clip_id=161 12/07/2007 . Town Council Page 8 of 14 height to 60 feet. The proposed building meets the Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District setback requirement, so the requested relief from the provision has been withdrawn. Mary Beth Savel, Lewis and Roca, 1 S. Church, representing the applicant, Transwest Partners LLC, reviewed a PowerPoint presentation regarding the proposed Hotel Plaza located in Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development (PAD) Neighborhood 3. She highlighted the requested changes as follows: — Add "hotel' as a permitted use for the Campus Park Industrial (CPI) district on the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development (PAD). — Permit a maximum 60-foot building height for the hotel on this parcel only (PAD currently allows 36 feet maximum). She further reviewed the concept plans and view shed analysis for the project and stated that access to the site will be from Innovation Park Drive. Ms. Savel reviewed the Hotel Plaza Site Design benefits some of which were as follows: 1) Reduced rooms equals reduced parking and increased site landscaping. 2) Increased landscape buffer creates pedestrian/landscape linkage to Neighborhood 3 linear park. 3) Location against ridgeline minimizes horizon impacts and avoids obstruction of Catalina Mountain views. 4) General Plan designated this area as regional shopping center and biotech park appropriate for specialized hotel facilities. Ms.Savel further highlighted that Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 3 would offer a prime location for a hotel to serve the hospital, medical and biotech companies and services. The addition of a hotel to this area would also move Ventana Medical Systems hotel demand (4,000 + nights per year) from Oracle/Rudasill hotels into Oro Valley. It would further capture current Hilton El Conquistador room reservation unfilled demand (29,000 per year). Planning and Zoning Director Sarah More reviewed the CPI zoning of the property and explained that adoption of Ordinance (0)07-39 would provide a "text amendment" that would allow a hotel in the Rancho Vistoso PAD with a maximum height up to 60 feet. She noted that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the addition of the hotel to the CPI zone but were opposed to the additional height request. She further reviewed General Plan compliance. Economic Development Administrator David Welsh stated that this project is consistent with the Economic Development Strategy. He further noted that there are not a lot of opportunities for resort development in the Town and this site is an excellent placement for the hotel plaza which would http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=2&clip_id=161 12/07/2007 . ToAm Council Page 9 of 14 benefit the nearby companies. Mayor Loomis recessed the meeting at 9:22 p.m. The meeting resumed at 9:27 p.m. Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. Gregg Forszt, Ventana Medical Systems, stated that they support the hotel plaza in the Town. He stated that they will be needing 14,000 - 16,000 room nights per year and this hotel would provide amenities and the facilities needed for their business. Joe Hornat, Town resident, stated that he supports a hotel at this location; however, the PAD states that the height is 36 feet and he hoped that the Council would deny the project. Art Segal, Town resident, stated that the Town should adhere to the Town Codes. He stated that another hotel was not a necessity as was the hospital. Kathy Pastryk, Town resident, stated that many want to make Oro Valley a city and she questioned whether we want to be like Tucson or Phoenix. She stated that the scale of the hotel must be considered and she felt that the lot was not big enough to accommodate the proposed 5-story hotel. Neil Simon, representing Venture West, stated that the hotel use would be very useful for the plans in Neighborhood 3. He stated that a large amount of thought has been given to the aesthetics of the site and they felt that the planned hotel would benefit the corporate businesses in the area. Zev Cywan, Town resident, stated that this project violates the Town's zoning ordinances and this was not a text amendment. Mayor Loomis closed the public hearing. Discussion followed regarding: allowing hotels in the CPI district (restricting hotel use to same parcel or specific areas), protecting the quality of life, conditioning the parcel to a specific user (i.e. Hilton Embassy Suites), text amendments to the Rancho Vistoso PAD regarding hotel height, and restricting use and height to a specific parcel. MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Parish and seconded by Council Member Kunisch to adopt Ordinance (0)07-39 amending the Permitted Uses and Development standards for the Campus Park Industrial (CPI) Land Use District within the Rancho Vistoso PAD to add 'Hotel' to the http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=2&clip_id=161 12/07/2007 . Town Council Page 10 of 14 permitted uses in Section 1.3.H.1.b.2, and allow for a maximum height for a proposed hotel up to 60 feet in Section 1.3.H.1.c.2 as shown as Exhibit "B" with the change that 1.P read "Hotels as an allowed use on Parcel #223- 02-0212D." Further discussion followed regarding: — Hotel would be good for the Town and is part of the effort to move away from our dependence on retail development — The hotel is consistent with the General Plan Land Use policies, Economic Sustainability policies, Resort Residential Communities and Community Economic Development Strategy. — Demand on area hotels, currently losing 135.6 rooms daily to hotels outside Oro Valley. — Must embrace what is coming and what is good for the community. — Concerns expressed regarding the height of the proposed hotel. — Impact on visibility is minimal. — Council is dedicated to high tech, bio-tech industry and this hotel would support this type of growth and industry. MOTION carried, 5-2 with Council Member Abbott and Council Member Carter opposed. Mayor Loomis recessed the meeting at 10:10 p.m. The meeting resumed at 10:18 p.m. (Council Member Gillaspie left the meeting during the recess.) 4. OV12-06-28 REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT/DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR PROFESSIONAL OFFICES AND RESTAURANT COMPLEX LOCATED EAST OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD, JUST NORTH OF THE SAFEWAY SHOPPING PLAZA, IN RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 5 Explanation: This project is located on 8 acres and includes 63,236 square feet for professional office development and 12,850 square feet for a restaurant complex Paul Oland, The WLB Group, representing the applicant, reviewed the proposed preliminary plat and development plan for The Plaza at Vistoso which will include professional office development and a restaurant complex. He addressed ingress/egress, landscaping, traffic flow and signalization, an additional lane for a loading zone, bufferyard and terraced retaining walls and setbacks. Council further discussed site lighting, noise impacts, restaurant hours and traffic circulation. http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=2&clip_id=161 12/07/2007 Town Council Page 11 of 14 Planning and Zoning Director Sarah More reported that the Development Review Board (DRB) has recommended approval of the development plan/preliminary plat, landscape plan and the Open Space trade for the Plaza at Vistoso. She stated that the property meets all the Zoning Code requirements and that odor and noise abatement would be applied to the development. She further reviewed the Open Space trade and alternative parking analysis. Town Engineer Craig Civalier explained that a traffic impact analysis has been conducted and a traffic signal is warranted for this site. The developer and Safeway have worked with Town staff to address the signal. Council discussion followed regarding the three way traffic stops, noise impacts and regulations regarding live entertainment and music. Mayor Loomis opened the floor for public input. Jennifer Paddison, representing Safeway, Inc., stated that they are in support of the development and they are working on the traffic signal. She further commented that they would not allow cross -parking between the two centers and they are also concerned with access to the site. Vicki Duprey, Town resident, expressed concerns regarding the height of several of the buildings that would be placed behind her property. She asked that the buildings be lowered and towers be eliminated. She also expressed concerns regarding the trees on the tiered walls and asked that shrubs be placed on the second tier. She further expressed concerns regarding the placement of the garbage bin and asked that it be moved. She also questioned a possible cut in the curb along Rancho Vistoso Boulevard. Diane Kelley, Town resident, expressed concerns regarding the height of the restaurants, hours of operation and outside dining. She asked that the restaurants not be opened later than midnight and that any open patios face away from the neighbors to help minimize noise impacts. Vicki Dohm, Town resident, expressed concerns regarding the restaurants' hours of operation. She also stated that they were told that this would be an office complex and questioned whether retail would be allowed. She expressed concerns regarding the ingress into the property. She stated that they are not opposed to the project but asked that the elevation be lowered and that the buildings be only one-story. Steve Dohm, Town resident, stated that the issue is the elevation of the development and its impact on their property values. He stated that there http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=2&clip_id=161 12/07/2007 Tolm Council Page 12 of 14 would be two-story buildings sitting 100 feet from their property line so there are privacy issues. He also stated that the project is "under parked" and questioned how the parking would be handled. Discussion followed regarding shared parking between Safeway and the proposed development and encouraging the developer and the residents to continue to work together. MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Parish and seconded by Council Member Abbott to CONTINUE this item with the request that 1) The dumpster on the north wall be moved to another location, 2) address the "under -parking" issue and 3) Possibly giving the Town the authority for enforcement at the 4-way stop. Council discussion followed traffic circulation, parking, possible "stacking" issues as citizens turn into the complex off of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard, MOTION failed, 3-3 with Mayor Loomis, Council Member Carter, and Council Member Kunisch opposed. MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Parish and seconded by Council Member Kunisch to approve OV12-06-28 with the following additional conditions: 1) There will be no dumpster placed on the north end of the property, 2) The hours of restaurant operation are limited to between 6:00 a.m. and 12:00 midnight, 3) An agreement shall be reached whereby the Town is given the enforcement ability at the 4- way stop providing connectivity between the Safeway Plaza and the new site (will become a legal 4-way stop), 4) Include the conditions listed in Exhibit "A", 5) Minimum setback between the property line and buildings shall be 70 feet, 6) Lighting shall be fully shielded and shall not exceed 16 feet in height, 7) The straightening of the corner of the roadway around the 4-way stop by the signal will be investigated and approved by the Town Engineer and also to encourage the developer to work with the homeowners close to Rancho Vistoso Boulevard on the placement of trees/shrubs so views are not obstructed. Exhibit "A" Conditions added by the Development Review Board: 1. The applicant shall be required to implement a planting scheme that would prohibit people from walking in the three tiered buffer at the northwest corner. ***This will be reviewed with the resubmittal of the landscape plan. 2. The covered parking structures shall be limited to ten feet (10') in height. Conditions of Approval from the Development Review Board staff report: 1. Staff shall require that this signal be constructed and operational prior to the release of the first certificate of occupancy for this development. Due to the proximity to the existing traffic signal at the intersection of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and Tangerine Road, this new signal shall be designed and constructed to communicate and coordinate the phasing with the original light. 2. This new signal will also be required to incorporate the Opticom emergency vehicle sensor system as required by the Golder Ranch Fire District. http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=2&clip_id=161 12/07/2007 , Town Council Page 13 of 14 3. As depicted on the current development plan/preliminary plat, the developer shall incorporate into their design the ability to mitigate the sight visibility problem created by the existing buildings at the main project ingress/egress point. This shall be accomplished by reserving an area to shift the existing Safeway driveway north by 12 feet and reconfigure the loading zone currently serving existing building at the Safeway Shopping Center. 4. Any change to the mix of land uses proposed shall require a new alternative parking analysis be submitted. MOTION carried, 6-0. 5. CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING RECOMMENDED CHANGES TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) FOR FY 2008-2009 AND THE APPOINTMENT OF ONE COUNCIL MEMBER LIAISON TO THE CIP TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE Finance Director Stacey Lemos reviewed the recommended changes to the Capital Improvement Program (CIP), the desired goals and outcomes and proposed timeline. MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Kunisch and seconded by Council Member Carter to approve the recommended changes to the FY 2008/2009 CIP process and nominate Mayor Loomis to serve as the Town Council liaison for FY 08/09. MOTION carried, 6-0. 6. APPOINTMENT OF COUNCIL SUB -COMMITTEE AND SCHEDULING OF ANNUAL EMPLOYEE FORUM Human Resource Analyst Carol Willett reviewed the Council Communication and asked that Council appoint a sub -committee for the Annual Employee Forum. MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Kunisch and seconded by Vice Mayor Dankwerth to appoint Mayor Loomis, Vice Mayor Dankwerth and Council Member Kunisch to serve on the Council sub -committee for the Annual Employee Forum. MOTION carried, 6-0. 7. CONSIDERATION AND/OR POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THE SELECTION OF A SHORT LIST OF CANDIDATES FOR THE TOWN ATTORNEY POSITION http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view id=2&clip_id=161 12/07/2007 . Town Council Page 14 of 14 Human Resources Director Sandra Abbey stated that an initial review of applications has been completed in the selection of the Town Attorney. MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Kunisch and seconded by Council Member Carter to create a list of 4 candidates to be interviewed and to include the following applicants on such list: Paul Klose, Timothy LaMartina, Tobin Rosen and Nathan Hannah and instruct staff to make necessary arrangements to schedule interviews with the candidates and the Council. MOTION carried, 6-0. 8. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS - None presented. CALL TO AUDIENCE Doug McKee, Town resident, referenced Consent Agenda Item L and stated that the report regarding Economic Development Agreements (EDAs) should be expanded to include the status of development plans and forward projections of what sales tax amounts we can expect from these developments. He further addressed the current EDAs, phasing of the projects, the timeline targets in the EDAs and analyzing tax collections. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Carter and seconded by Council Member Parish to adjourn at 11:50 p.m. MOTION carried, 6-0. http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view id=2&clip_id=161 12/07/2007 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 3 =OUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: October 17, 2007 1 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: Matt Michels, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Public Hearing: Ordinance No. (0) 07 - 39 , amending the Permitted Uses and Development Standards for the Campus Park Industrial (CPI) Land Use District within the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development (PAD) to add Hotel to the permitted uses, and allow for a maximum height for a proposed hotel up to 60 feet for NCH Corporation/Transwest Properties, being represented by The Planning Center, OV9-07-02A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant's request is to amend the Rancho Vistoso PAD to allow for the development of a hotel, up to sixty (60') feet in height, on a parcel within the southeast portion of Innovation Corporate Center (ICC) in the southern portion of Neighborhood 3, along Tangerine Road. The application is to amend the Permitted Uses and Development Standards for the Campus Park Industrial (CPI) Land Use District within the Rancho Vistoso PAD to add Hotel to the permitted uses, and allow for a maximum height for a proposed hotel up to 60 feet from the finished grade to the top of parapet on the applicant's property. AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends (4:2) approval of the request to amend the Rancho Vistoso PAD to allow the hotel use in the CPI zone. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends that the request to allow a height limit over that for other CPI uses for a hotel on this site be denied. They further recommended denial of the withdrawn request for modification of the Tangerine Road Corridor setback requirements for this site. See below for additional discussion of the Planning and Zoning Commission action. BACKGROUND: Process to Date Neighborhood Meeting March 29, 2007 P&ZC Public Hearing for original proposal (OV9-07-002) April 3, 2007 P&ZC Public Hearing for amended proposal (OV9-07-002A) July 12, 2007 Resubmittal for Town Council September 13, 2007 Town Council Hearing October 17, 2007 The original request to include hotels in the CPI land use district and the additional height was brought before the Planning and Zoning Commission (P&ZC) at the April 3`d, 2007 meeting. The recommendation was for approval of the proposed development standards for hotels but denial of the requested 75 foot height. Staff had proposed the addition of a new Section 2, Specific Property Development Standards for Hotels, to Section 1.3.H, _ffice Park Development Standards within the Rancho Vistoso PAD. This proposed section was not included in —e motion to approve the hotel use. In an effort to be fair and consistent throughout the CPI district, hotels should be an allowable use on any CPI property. However, hotels would be limited to the CPI maximum building height of thirty-six (36') feet except TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of for the applicant's property. The original proposal included a 1,000-foot area from Tangerine Road northward that would allow a maximum building height of 75 feet. However, concerns were raised that this was too broad and may allow for a proliferation of taller hotels along this corridor. The current request for additional height is site specific. Further discussion of the proposed height standard is contained in the Location and Height of Hotels section of this report. Subsequent to the original proposal, the applicant requested a reduced 185-foot building setback from the property line/right-of-way line to address non-compliance of their proposal with the 4:1 Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District (TRCOD) setback standard. The amended request was given a new Oro Valley case number (OV#, from OV9-07-002 to OV9-07-002A, which is the current OV#). The amended request was heard at the July 12th Planning and Zoning Commission meeting and was recommended for denial. Further discussion of the P&ZC recommendation is contained below. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: At their meeting of April 3ra, 2007, the P&ZC voted (4:2) to approve the addition of Hotels to the permitted uses in the CPI district at the height currently permitted by the PAD (36 feet, 44 feet on slopes from 15 to 25 percent), but the motion did not include staff's proposed Specific Property Development Standards for Hotels (Section 2 in Rancho Vistoso PAD Section 1.3.H), (see Planning and Zoning Commission Exhibit `A', attached). Following are the motions: Vice -Chair McKee moved to deny the application primarily on the grounds that it should have gone through the general plan amendment process rather than a PAD amendment process. The motion failed a 3 yes, 3 no vote. Another motion was made to approve the addition of hotels to the permitted uses at the heia already allowed by the PAD, based on the assertion that the hospital was a unique community facility that should be allowed additional height due to its value to the community and that other buildings, such as the proposed hotel, do not warrant additional height. There were no additional conditions specified by the Commission. The motion carried 4 yes, 2 no. The minutes from this hearing are attached for your reference. At their meeting of July 12th, 2007, the P&ZC voted 6:0 to deny the proposed text amendments to Policy 9 for Neighborhood 3 of the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development (PAD) and to Section 24.1.B.l.b.i of the Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District in the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised (OVZCR) to allow for a reduced building setback for a proposed hotel. Following is the motion: Commissioner Adler moved that the P&ZC recommend to Council that the 4:1 setback ratio as reflected in the Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District in the Oro Valley Zoning Code be retained. Commissioner Pivirotto seconded the motion. The motion carried 6 yes, 0 no. The minutes and staff report from this hearing are attached for your reference. At both public hearings, public speakers on the issue primarily expressed concern about building height. ANALYSIS OF REQUEST: The proposed text amendments are site -specific for the proposed hotel to be located on the applicant's parcel. The applicant previously proposed an amendment Section 24.I.B.l.b.i of the TRCOD in the OVZCR to allow for a reduced building setback to 185 feet. As discussed, this request was recommended for denial at the July 121h P&ZC hearing and the applicant has since modified their proposal and has withdrawn this request and V current proposal conforms to the TRCOD setback standard. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Location and Height of Hotels 3 of 6 • Hotels and motels up to the CPI maximum height of 36' (44' on slopes from 15 to 25 percent) will be allowed throughout the CPI district. Staff recommends that hotels be restricted to CPI zoned areas (primarily Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 3) where they will have best proximity to major transportation, medical, retail, office and technological park facilities. The applicant desires additional height (60') to accommodate the development of a large (-244 room) hotel on the southeast corner of Innovation Corporate Center East (ICCE). Their goal is to be less visually intrusive than the existing hospital. The following table shows the height requirements of the proposed standards with those of the Northwest Medical Center -Oro Valley and the existing Rancho Vistoso PAD CPI standards: Facility Height Proposed Hotel Standards 60 ft Existing Hospital 74 ft Rancho Vistoso CPI 36-44 ft • A Hotel over 36 feet will only be allowed on the applicant's parcel (Parcel #223-02-021D). The location east of Innovation Park Drive and immediately north of Tangerine Road is slightly lower than other surrounding areas. The Northwest Medical Center, built in 2004, is nearly 74 feet tall yet the verticality of the structure is mitigated and de-emphasized by its lowered building site and by the surrounding higher topography. The requested height of 60 feet for the hotel will not impede views or stand out as prominently as it might in other areas. The proposed hotel is much smaller in scale and the overall mass of the structure will be much less than the hospital. Further, the proposed location of the 60-foot hotel is in proximity to major transportation corridors (Oracle Road, Tangerine Road, and Innovation Park Drive), the Northwest Medical Center, technology firms such as Ventana Medical Systems, the Oro Valley Marketplace, which is across the street, and other businesses and offices. The tradeoff for additional height is more open space and buffers on -site. A lower building would mean less open space and buffers assuming the same number of rooms or square footage. The applicant's goal is to maintain the predominantly low -scale suburban look of the area, while providing a meaningful service for the area. The visual impact is mitigated by the generally lower elevation of the site relative to surrounding hills and ridgelines and the distance from the nearest residential use. The nearest home, in Catalina Shadows to the south, is approximately 2,200 feet or .42 miles. The view from the west toward Pusch Ridge and the Catalina Mountains will not be severely impacted, nor the view from the south toward the Tortolita Mountains, primarily based on the lowered site and situation of the hotel. The applicant's viewshed analysis (attached as part of the overall application) demonstrates this. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 4 of C Mountains, primarily based on the lowered site and situation of the hotel. The applicant's viewshed analysis (attached as part of the overall application) demonstrates this. TRCOD/ORSCOD COMPLIANCE: The proposed hotel development will be thoroughly reviewed for code compliance at the development plan stage. The proposal will be able to meet all standards of TRCOD and Oracle Road Corridor Overlay District (ORSCOD). GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE: The following policies are notable for this amendment: Land Use Policy 1.3.2: The Town shall encourage new development to locate uses that depend on convenient transportation access (e.g., higher density residential and commercial) near major arterial streets. The area of the proposed hotel is in close proximity to Tangerine Road, Oracle Road, and Innovation Park Drive. There will be a SunTran transit center across Tangerine Road in the Oro Valley Marketplace, offering transit access to workers and patrons of the hotel. Transportation Special Area Policies —La Cholla-Tangerine, Guidelines for Commercial Development: More intense uses such as hotels and retail commercial shall be located closer to arterial street access points and away from existing less intense uses. The proposed location of a hotel in close proximity to Tangerine Road, Oracle Road, and Innovation Park Drive is consistent with this policy. Economic Development Policy 3.1.5: The Town shall continue its efforts to attract new high -end retail and service businesses, especially those in under -represented categories, in order to help reduce expenditure leakage. The proposed hotel use will provide a needed, complementary use to the nearby hospital, medical facilities, Oro Valley Marketplace shopping center, and technology industries such as Ventana Medical Systems. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENT: All property owners within 600' of the owner's property, all CPI properties within Rancho Vistoso, and all HOAs within the affected area have been notified of the public hearing in accordance with the Town notification requirements. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY UNCIL COMMUNICATION There have been several inquiries requesting further explanation and clarification regarding the proposal. There were four (4) speakers in opposition to this proposal at the April 3`d P&ZC hearing and there were nine (9) speakers in opposition to the modified proposal at the July 12`h P&ZC hearing. The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on March 291h, 2007. Approximately 15 residents were in attendance. The issues discussed included the nature of the proposal, the appropriateness of the proposed use for the site, the possible viewshed impacts of the hotel. Concerns were also expressed about the proposed hotel's signage and lighting. PROS AND CONS: Pros 1. A 60-foot hotel in the defined area near Tangerine Road will not adversely impact views from surrounding properties. 2. The Northwest Medical Center -Oro Valley height is 74 feet from finished grade. The proposed specific development standards are intended to ensure that hotels will have no greater visual impact than the existing hospital. 3. The southern portion of Neighborhood 3 is an excellent location for a hotel facility that will serve and complement surrounding uses such as the hospital, technology industries, general offices, the Oro Valley IMarketplace, and other businesses in the vicinity. 4. The nearest home, in Catalina Shadows to the south, is approximately 2,200 feet or .42 miles. 5. The 60-foot height limit will be restricted to this specific property. Cons 1. There will be some visual impact on residents of Catalina Shadows to the south, as well as from Tangerine Road and Oracle Road. However, Oro Valley Marketplace will be developed in between Catalina Shadows and the hotel. 2. The 60-foot height limit is not consistent with the height limit for other CPI zoning in the Rancho Vistoso PAD. CONCLUSION: This proposed amendments to the Rancho Vistoso PAD have been measured against the goals and policies of the General Plan, the standards the TRCOD and the ORSCOD, as well as a visual analysis of the potential viewshed impacts of the proposal. This proposal will be able to meet all of these regulations and guidelines. SUGGESTED MOTIONS: The Town Council may wish to consider one of the following motions: ove to [adopt, adopt with conditions, OR deny] Ordinance No. (0) 07- 39 , amending the Permitted Uses Development Standards for the Campus Park Industrial (CPI) Land Use District within the Rancho Vistoso PAD to add Hotel to the permitted uses in Section 1.3.H.1.b.2, and allow for a maximum height for a proposed hotel up to 60 feet in Section 1.3.H.1.c.2, as shown in Exhibit `A'. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 6 of Attachments: Attachment 1 Ordinance (0) 07- 39 Attachment 2—Applicant's Proposal Attachment 3—Exhibit `A', P&ZC-recommended Amendment to Section 1.3 of the Rancho Vistoso PAD Attachment 4—Exhibit `B', Proposed Amendments to Section 1.3 of the Rancho Vistoso PAD including additional height allowance for hotel Attachment 5-4-3-07 P&ZC Approved Minutes Attachment 6-4-3-07 P&ZC Exhibit `A' —Proposed Amendments to Section 1.3 of the Rancho Vistoso PAD Attachment 7-4-3-07 P&ZC Staff Report Attachment 8-7-12-07 P&ZC Draft Minutes Attachment 9-7-12-07 P&ZC Staff Report Attachment 10-7-12-07 P&ZC Exhibit `A' —Proposed Amendments to Section 24.1.B.l.b.i, OVZCR and Policy 9 for Neighborhood 3 of the Rancho Vistoso PAD F:\OV\OV9\2007\9-07-02A\Reports\TCreport.doc ah S. More,'Planning and Zoning Director atson, Assistant Town Manager David Andrews, Town Manager ORDINANCE NO. (0) 07 - 39 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE PERMITTED USES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR THE CAMPUS PARK INDUSTRIAL (CPI) LAND USE DISTRICT WITHIN THE RANCHO VISTOSO PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT (PAD) TO ADD HOTELS TO THE PERMITTED USES AND ALLOW FOR A MAXIMUM HEIGHT FOR A PROPOSED HOTEL UP TO 60 FEET WHEREAS, the purpose of the proposed amendments is to allow for the development of a hotel, up to sixty (60') feet in height, on a parcel within the southeast portion of Innovation Corporate Center (ICC) in the southern portion of Neighborhood 3, along Tangerine Road; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission at the duly noticed April 3, 2007 public hearing, the Commission recommended approval to the Town Council by a 4:2 vote to amend in Section 1.3.H.1.b.2 of the Rancho Vistoso PAD to add hotels to permitted uses in the CPI land use district at the current permitted height limits which is thirty six (36') feet; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission at the duly noticed July 12, 2007 public hearing, the Commission recommended denial to the Town Council by a 6:0 vote to amend Policy 9 for Neighborhood 3 of the Rancho Vistoso PAD and to Section 24.1.B.l.b.i of the Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District in the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised to allow for a reduced building setback for a proposed hotel; and WHEREAS, the Oro Valley Town Council has duly considered the proposed amendments and the Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendations at a duly noticed Public Hearing; and finds that it is consistent with the Town's General Plan and the Oro Valley Zoning Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY: SECTION 1. Hotel shall be added to Section 1.3.H.1.b.2, the Permitted Uses and Development Standards for the Campus Park Industrial (CPI) Land Use District within the Rancho Vistoso PAD. SECTION 2. Section 1.3.H.1.c.2, Building. Height, Campus Park Industrial (CPI) Land Use District within the Rancho Vistoso PAD shall be amended to allow for a maximum height for a proposed hotel up to sixty (60') feet solely on Parcel #223-02-021D. SECTION 3. That this ordinance and the various parts thereof are hereby declared to be revocable. If any section, sub -section, sentence, clause, word or phrase of this ordinance is, for any reason, held to be unconstitutional, such holdings shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance. SECTION 4. That the amendment as set forth in Exhibit `A' be and hereby is adopted. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 17t' day of October, 2007. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Paul H. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Town Attorney Date: F:\OV\OV9\2007\9-07-02A\ORDINANCE NO 07--.doc ATTACHMENT 3-P&Z COMMISSION RECOMMENDED AMENDMENTS Exhibit `A', OV9-07-02A Proposed Amendment to Rancho Vistoso PAD Section 1.3 Land Use/Additional Material NOTE: The text to be added is BOLD IN ALL CAPS The text to be deleted has been StFUGk thFough H. Office Park Development Standards The Office Park development standards of height, setbacks, open space and yards are listed in the following pages. An illustrative section follows the standards and graphically portrays the conditions that the modified standards will produce. 1. OFFICE/RESEARCH PARK (CPI) a. Purpose: This district is intended to provide for administrative, research and development and office activities in a campus -like setting. All uses shall be of a non -nuisance type and shall blend into the natural desert landscape. This district is to provide employment near residential areas. b. Permitted Uses: 1) As allowed in Article 8-3, Section 8-303, O.V.Z.C.R., T-P Technological Park District. 2) Other uses: a) Administrative and professional offices; b) Apparel (clothing and other products manufactured from textiles): c) Art needlework and handweaving; d) Manufacture of: i) Cameras and other photographic equipment and supplies, ii) Dentures and drugs. iii) Jewelry, iv) Leather products: Including shoes and machine belting (excluding tanning). v) Luggage, vi) Musical instruments, vii) Orthopedic and medical supplies (such as artificial limbs, braces, supports and stretchers), viii) Small paper products (such as envelopes, stationery, bags, boxes and wallpaper printing), ix) Plastic products: But not including the processing of the raw material, x) Precision instruments (such as optical, medical and drafting), A) Silverware, plate and sterling. xii) Sporting and athletic equipment, xiii) Toys; e) Manufacture and assembly of electrical and electronic products; f) Manufacture and packaging of beverage products; g) Manufacture and service of data systems; h) Ink mixing and packaging and inked ribbons; i) Laboratories: Medical, dental, research, experimental and testing; D Printing, newspaper publishing and binding: including engraving and photo- engraving; k) Soap and detergents: Packaging only 1) Warehousing; m) Wholesale business and storage provided there is no outdoor storage. n) Any other manufacturing uses that are similar to those listed above; o) Recreational vehicle storage area in neighborhood 3 only, and further, that the exact location of the of said storage areas be approved by the Planning Commission; (Ord.89-5) P) HOTELS p Q) The Town Council may add other uses as necessary in addition to the established list. C. Property Development Standards: 1) Minimum Property Size: None 2) Building Height: No building shall exceed 36 feet, except on slopes between 15 and 25 percent, the height shall not exceed 44 feet. ATTACHMENT 4-PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 1.3 OF THE RANCHO ISTOSO PAD INCLUDING ADDITIONAL HEIGHT ALLOWANCE FOR HOTEL Exhibit `B', OV9-07-02A Proposed Amendment to Rancho Vistoso PAD Section 1.3 Land Use/Additional Material NOTE: The text to be added is BOLD IN ALL CAPS The text to be deleted has been stFUsk-thfeugh H. Office Park Development Standards The Office Park development standards of height, setbacks, open space and yards are listed in the following pages. An illustrative section follows the standards and graphically portrays the conditions that the modified standards will produce. OFFICE/RESEARCH PARK (CPI) Purpose: This district is intended to provide for administrative, research and development and office activities in a campus -like setting. All uses shall be of a non -nuisance type and shall blend into the natural desert landscape. This district is to provide employment near residential areas. b. Permitted Uses: 1) As allowed in Article 8-3, Section 8-303, O.V.Z.C.R., T-P Technological Park District. 2) Other uses: a) Administrative and professional offices; b) Apparel (clothing and other products manufactured from textiles): c) Art needlework and handweaving; d) Manufacture of: i) Cameras and other photographic equipment and supplies, ii) Dentures and drugs. iii) Jewelry, iv) Leather products: Including shoes and machine belting (excluding tanning). v) Luggage, vi) Musical instruments, vii) Orthopedic and medical supplies (such as artificial limbs, braces, supports and stretchers), viii) Small paper products (such as envelopes, stationery, bags, boxes and wallpaper printing), ix) Plastic products: But not including the processing of the raw material, x) Precision instruments (such as optical, medical and drafting), xi) Silverware, plate and sterling. xii) Sporting and athletic equipment, xiii) Toys; e) Manufacture and assembly of electrical and electronic products; f) Manufacture and packaging of beverage products; g) Manufacture and service of data systems; h) Ink mixing and packaging and inked ribbons; i) Laboratories: Medical, dental, research, experimental and testing; j) Printing, newspaper publishing and binding: including engraving and photo- engraving; k) Soap and detergents: Packaging only 1) Warehousing; m) Wholesale business and storage provided there is no outdoor storage. n) Any other manufacturing uses that are similar to those listed above; o) Recreational vehicle storage area in neighborhood 3 only, and further, that the exact location of the of said storage areas be approved by the Planning Commission; (Ord.89-5) P) HOTELS p Q) The Town Council may add other uses as necessary in addition to the established list. C. Property Development Standards: 1) Minimum Property Size: None 2) Building Height: No building shall exceed 36 feet, except on slopes between 15 and 25 percent, the height shall not exceed 44 feet. THE HOTEL TO BE LOCATED ON PIMA COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 223-02-021 D SHALL NOT EXCEED 60 FEET FROM THE FINISHED GRADE TO THE TOP OF PARAPET. April 3, 2007 Approved Minutes Planning and Zoning Commission -ADOT could look at the maximum traffic that could be generated for this site with other uses to see if a turn lane would be required. PUBLIC HEARING opened at 7:05 p.m. Dick Parcel, 211 E. Mountain Sunset Place, was concerned about the drainage ditch. Drainage is severely affecting his property and two others now. What will happen when Shoppes at Oracle are put in? Sue Wuestman, 212 E. Mountain Sunset Place wanted clarification on who to speak to regarding drainage. PUBLIC HEARING closed at 7:15 p.m. - The uses delinated in the Table of Uses are part of the Code and are permitted uses. MOTION: Commissioner Bergman MOVED to approve OV9-06-01, Norris Design, representing The Johansen Group, LLC., the rezoning request from R1-144 to C-N Neighborhood Commercial with the conditions in Exhibit A and an additional condition that the traffic be submitted to ADOT for re- evaluation based upon the average daily traffic for the most intensive use that would be permitted in this district. Commissioner Pivirotto seconded the motion. Motion carried with 5 yes, 1 no. Commissioner Adler voting no. Break from 7:15 to 7:25 p.m. --� 6. Public Hearing, OV9-07-002, The Planning Center, representing NCH Corporation, proposes a text amendment to the Permitted Uses and Development Standards for the CPI Land Use District within the Rancho Vistoso PAD to add Hotel and Motel to the permitted uses within the CPI zoning district and to allow for a maximum height for hotels/motels up to 75 feet to top of parapet or top of mechanical penthouse. Applicant Bob Conant, 110 S. Church Street, Tucson, gave a PowerPoint presentation. A trend is developing of putting hotels in industrial parks which allows sales people and others traveling for corporations to be close by. Applicant is asking for 75 feet in height for efficiency in the footprint of the building and in service to clients. Applicant has no objection to the other development standards staff is recommending. The finished floor elevation of the proposed hotel will be 7.5 feet lower than the Northwest Medical Center Oro Valley. The hotel design won't particularly impare views from west and southwest. Answers to Commissioner's questions: - The back of the hotel will face Tangerine Road. - Less than 6 stories would take up much more land area to get the number of rooms. - 75 foot height will not go above the ridgeline to the east. - Residential components to west and southwest sit higher. - Ridgeline to east is unbuildable. - Setbacks are 4 to 1 as required from staff. - Parking will be hidden from view from Tangerine Road. - This request is for this specific site. - A General Plan amendment is not necessary. - Josh Westling, NCH Corporation, 2850 E. Skyline Dr., Tucson. There will only be back lite signage on the building. Signage is necessary to identify the building, ideally up high. Applicant is willing to conform to signage standards. - Signage is reviewed by staff and DRB, including location. - The water park will have a swimming pool, hot tub and maybe a waterfall. No multiple slides. - Mike Carlier, Consultant to NCH. Hotel is necessitated by the hospital and industrial site in the area. Ventana Medical alone buys 4,000 room nights per year, which would be in this facility. April 3, 2007 Approved Minutes Planning ai iu Zoning Commission Matt Michels gave the staff report. - Text amendment to allow hotels in CPI is not limited to this specific site, but the increased height would only be allowed along Tangerine Road in this area. - The PAD amendment encompasses both use and height. - Conditions could be proposed on part of the package. - A hotel needs study has been done and will be provided to the Town Council. - Commercial land in the area will eventually be developed and will have a visual impact. The goal is that is won't be a negative impact. PUBLIC HEARING opened at 8:10 p.m. Elise Lomas, 2162 E. Tabular Place, Oro Valley, asked what other PAD's allowed buildings up to 75 feet. She was concerned that parking could be an eyesore, and will this set a precedent for future building? Wayne Krouse, 13763 N. Placita Meseta De Oro, Oro Valley. Staff indicated there is very little CPI zoning except for in that area. The CPI zoning is on both sides of Innovation Park Drive to Rancho Vistoso Blvd., to Oracle Road through Rancho Vistoso Blvd. into Innovation Park Blvd. and about 2 miles up Oracle Rd. A variance could be allowed for this application rather than changing all of CPI. He had concerns about the water park size, that the building would look massive, that CPI will be next to residential district, that lights be low impact. Plans should be presented to architects of Vistoso and Sun City. Rates should be low for hospital visitors. Mike Parr, 577 W. Quiet Springs, Oro Valley, agreed with Mr. Krouse on the use of a variance. He likes the project, but doesn't think 75 feet makes a lot of sense in other places. Robert Peck, 11932 N. Labyrinth Dr., Oro Valley, is opposed to the hotel and the 75 feet. His concerns are that a 75 foot building would be much more massive looking than shown; the area could become like a hotel or motel row of 75 foot buildings; and that there were not more people here. PUBLIC HEARING closed at 8:25 p.m. Discussion: Vice Chair McKee said this hotel will benefit the hospital. There are other hotel/motel developments being built. This is not a resort hotel, but mainly to support local industry. If all hotels discussed were built and annexed in, there would be 355% more hotel rooms than there is today. Scarce land originally laid out for high tech business is being converted for a hotel. This should have gone through the GP process with more study. He cannot support this at this time. Other details of concern: lighting, signage, ridgeline impacts, not being submitted to Sun City HOA and their architectural review committee. MOTION: Vice Chair McKee MOVED to deny this application primarily on the grounds that it should have gone through the General Plan amendment process rather than a PAD amendment process. Commissioner Paolino seconded the motion. Discussion: Commissioner Bergman's said there is sufficient precedent for other projects in the area so it doesn't require a GP amendment. The synergy between hospitals, industrial parks and hotels is well documented. She is troubled by the 75 foot height. The hospital is a landmark signature building in the area. Other buildings of a similar height set a dangerous precedent for future development and how it might change the character of the area. She can't support the height in that location. Chair Bistany said the hotel is a good adjunct to the hospital. He will not support the designated area for the 75 foot height, but will support the hotel for 75 feet height on the instant lot only. Commissioner Paolino will support the motion to deny on the same basis as Vice Chair McKee's and Commissioner Bergman's reasons. He is opposed to the 75 foot height. Commissioner Adler will support a motion to allow hotels in the zone as long as they are designed within 4 April 3, 2007 Approved Minutes Planning and Zoning Commission the existing height limitation. He will accept the need for a hotel in this location. The 75 foot height would be intrusive and disruptive of character. MOTION to deny failed on a 3 yes, 3 no vote. Commissioners McKee, Paolino and Adler voting yes. MOTION: Commissioner Bergman MOVED to recommend approval of OV9-07-02, amending the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development, Section 1.3.A, Office Park Development Standards, by adding Hotels to the permitted uses at the height already permitted in the PAD. Commissioner Adler seconded the motion. Discussion: Commissioner Adler said if the hotel were lowered, it would have to occupy more space. Is the site adequate or would additional parcels have to be purchased? What obstacles would arise from doing so? Ms. More said the proposal before you would not conform to the 4:1 setbacks proposed by staff for a 75 foot tall building. If they were to reduce the heights, the site area would have to double to get the same number of rooms. The design could be changed. MOTION carried 4 yes, 2 no, Vice Chair McKee and Chair Bistany voting no. 7. Public Hearing, OV7-07-01, The Town of Oro Valley Planning and Zoning Department requests a text amendment to Section 24.1.D.5, Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District, Utility Easements, in the of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised. Matt Michels gave the staff report. - The CUP permit with conditions specifying a future date that the power lines would be undergrounded would be enforceable if a condition was set forth either specifying a specific time by a certain date, or that it be concurrent with an event such as the widening of Tangerine Rd. - The Town is exploring funding sources, specifically a franchise agreement with TEP. - The interpretation is that replacement poles would be treated as new and/or additional and would use the same criteria. - If this Code amendment is not adopted, the impact would be that any new facilities would need to be undergrounded at the time of request. There is a special provision within this section of Code specific to the Tangerine Corridor that does not apply to any other area of the Town. The Code as written does not leave the Council the option of overriding this provision as a discretionary item. - The basis of the finding regarding funding is there currently is not a funding mechanism in place either via TEP's rate structure or by the Town's budget structure. - Overhead utility lines are subject to CUP throughout the Code in different zones. They must be expressly permitted in the Code. This Code amendment will help to clarify that the overlay zone does not override the general provision. - Identifying a specific timeframe for the CUP condition to underground could be a specific trigger such as improvements to the road. PUBLIC HEARING opened and closed with no speakers. MOTION: Vice Chair McKee MOVED to recommend denial of the text amendment (to Section 24.1.D.5, Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District, Utility Easements) on that basis that it is not needed. Motion fail for lack of a second. 5 Exhibit "A", OV9-07-02 Proposed Amendment to Rancho Vistoso PAD Section 1.3 Land Use/Additional Material NOTE: The text to be added is BOLD IN ALL CAPS The text to be deleted has been StFUGk threugI4 A. Office Park Development Standards The Office Park development standards of height, setbacks, open space and yards are listed in the.following pages. An illustrative section follows the standards and graphically portrays the conditions that the modified standards will produce. 1. OFFICE/RESEARCH PARK (CPI) a. Purpose: This district is intended to provide for administrative, research and development and office activities in a campus -like setting. All uses shall be of a non -nuisance type and shall blend into the natural desert landscape. This district is to provide employment near residential areas. b. Permitted Uses: 1) As allowed in Article 8-3, Section 8-303, O.V.Z.C.R., T-P Technological Park District. 2) Other uses: a) Administrative and professional offices; b) Apparel (clothing and other products manufactured from textiles): c) Art needlework and handweaving; d) Manufacture of: i) Cameras and other photographic equipment and supplies, ii) Dentures and drugs. iii) Jewelry, iv) Leather products: Including shoes and machine belting (excluding tanning). v) Luggage, vi) Musical instruments, vii) Orthopedic and medical supplies (such as artificial limbs, braces, supports and stretchers), viii) Small paper products (such as envelopes, stationery, bags, boxes and wallpaper printing), V ix) Plastic products: But not including the processing of the raw material, x) Precision instruments (such as optical, medical and drafting), xi) Silverware, plate and sterling. xii) Sporting and athletic equipment, xiii) Toys; e) Manufacture and assembly of electrical and electronic products; f) Manufacture and packaging of beverage products; g) Manufacture and service of data systems; h) Ink mixing and packaging and inked ribbons; i) Laboratories: Medical, dental, research, experimental and testing; j) Printing, newspaper publishing and binding: including engraving and photo- engraving; k) Soap and detergents: Packaging only 1) Warehousing; m) Wholesale business and storage provided there is no outdoor storage. n) Any other manufacturing uses that are similar to those listed above; o) Recreational vehicle storage area in neighborhood 3 only, and further, that the exact location of the of said storage areas be approved by the Planning Commission; (Ord.89-5) P) HOTELS: 1) RETAIL OPERATIONS, SUCH AS GIFT SHOPS ARE PERMITTED WHEN THE USE IS ACCESSORY TO A HOTEL. SUCH USES SHALL BE ENTERED FROM THE INTERIOR OF THE HOTEL. II) CONFERENCE AND MEETING FACILITIES ARE PERMITTED WHEN ACCESSORY TO A HOTEL. p Q) The Town Council may add other uses as necessary in addition to the established list. 1) Permitted secondary uses: The following uses shall be also permitted: a) Restaurant facilities, provided such use is accessory to A an indistrial facility; b) Child care centers; c) Banking or financial facilities; d) Recreational facilities: i) Common areas and recreational facilities shall be located so as K to be readily accessible to employees of the firm; ii) Recreational facilities for the use of the Office park employees are encouraged; iii) Facilities may include golf courses, tennis courts, health clubs, basketball courts, and other similar amenities; C. PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (1). GENERAL Property Development Standards: A4) Minimum Property Size: None B3) Building Height: No building shall exceed 36 feet, except on slopes between 15 and 25 percent, the height shall not exceed 44 feet. C3) Setbacks: a) Front Yard: 25 feet b) Side Yard: 20 feet or common wall. c) Rear Yard: 30 feet D4) Distance Between Buildings: There shall be a minimum of 10 feet between buildings. E5) Landscaping Requirements: Any part of the lot not required for buildings, . structures, loading and vehicular access, pedestrian walks and hard surface areas shall be landscaped according to the Rancho Vistoso or Sun City Vistoso Design Guidelines as applicable. A minimum of 15 percent of the net total area must be landscaped. F6) A six foot high masonry wall and 4 foot wide landscape screen shall be installed along the perimeter of the recreational vehicle storage area to be permitted in neighborhood 3 only. (Ord. 89-5) G7) Site Coverage: The building site coverage cannot exceed 50 percent. H6) Open Space Requirement: None, See 7) Site Coverage 19) Floor Area Ratio: None, See 7) Site Coverage and 2) Building Height 3 d. Parking for office uses: On -site parking is to be provided at the ratio of a minimum of one space per 250 square feet. (2). SPECIFIC PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR HOTELS A) THE GENERAL PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN SECTION C(1) APPLY. B) BUILDING HEIGHT: 1) NO BUILDING SHALL EXCEED THIRTY-SIX (36') FEET, EXCEPT FOR THE SOUTH ONE -THOUSAND (1,000') FEET OF NEIGHBORHOOD 3, WHICH HAS A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF SEVENTY-FIVE (75') FEET. THIS AREA IS DEFINED AS THOSE PROPERTIES WITHIN INNOVATION CORPORATE CENTER EAST THAT HAVE A FINISHED GRADE BELOW THE ELEVATION OF TANGERINE ROAD. 2) NO BUILDING OUTSIDE OF. THE SOUTH ONE -THOUSAND (1,000) FEET OF NEIGHBORHOOD 3 SHALL EXCEED 36 FEET, EXCEPT ON SLOPES BETWEEN 15 AND 25 PERCENT, THE HEIGHT SHALL NOT EXCEED FORTY-FOUR (44') FEET. B) SETBACKS FOR BUILDINGS IN EXCESS OF 36 FEET IN HEIGHT: 1) FRONT YARD: THE MINIMUM SETBACK FROM TANGERINE ROAD SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN A 4:1 BUILDING HEIGHT TO SETBACK RATIO. 2) SIDE YARD: 50 FEET 3) REAR YARD: 75 FEET. C) ARCHITECTURE: 1) THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SHALL BE REGIONALLY APPROPRIATE TO THE SOUTHWESTERN CONTEXT. USE OF STANDARDIZED CORPORATE IDENTIFICATION THEMES INTEGRATED INTO THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SHALL BE AVOIDED AND IS SUBJECT TO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD (DRB) APPROVAL. 2) BUILDINGS SHALL UTILIZE A MUTED COLOR PALATE TO HELP 4 THE BUILDING BLEND MORE SEAMLESSLY INTO ITS SURROUNDINGS. 3) THE ELEVATION DESIGN OF THE BUILDING(S) SHALL PROVIDE DESIGN CHARACTER AND DETAILING ON ALL FOUR (4) SIDES. ALL SCREENING DEVICES USED FOR ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE COMPATIBLE IN DESIGN AND COLOR TO THE REST OF THE STRUCTURE. ROOFTOP MECHANICALS SHALL BE SHIELDED FROM VIEW ON ALL FIVE (5) SIDES. 4) BUILDING ENTRIES SHALL BE CLEARLY ARTICULATED AND SHALL PROVIDE CLEARLY ARTICULATED PEDESTRIAN SCALE BY THE USE OF LOW LEVEL DETAIL, TEXTURES, COVERED OR RECESSED AREAS. 5) EXCESSIVE EXPANSES OF GLASS, ESPECIALLY CURTAIN WALLS, AND UNFINISHED SURFACES ARE PROHIBITED. GLASS AREA SHOULD NOT DOMINATE THE SURFACE AREA, EXCEPT AS MAY BE DESIRED ON THE GROUND LEVEL. FACADES SHALL BE BROKEN UP BY RECESSES, OFF -SETS OR OTHER ARTICULATION AT REGULAR INTERVALS. VARYING ROOF LINES OR HEIGHTS ARE ENCOURAGED. 6) ALL GLASS AND SIDING MATERIALS USED MUST BE LOW -REFLECTIVITY (<60%). THE REFLECTIVITY VALUE MAY BE FURTHER REDUCED IF THERE IS GLARE OR OTHER REFLECTIVE IMPACTS ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES. D) LANDSCAPING: 1) ALL LANDSCAPING INCLUDING TRASH AND REFUSE COLLECTION AREAS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED SECTION 27.6. 2) FOR BUILDINGS IN EXCESS OF 36 FEET, A TWENTY (20') LANDSCAPED BUFFER SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR AREAS AROUND ALL FOUR SIDES OF THE BUILDING, EXCEPT FOR LOADING ZONE AREAS. 3) THE AREA AROUND THE GROUND FLOOR SHALL INCLUDE PEDESTRIAN -SCALE FEATURES, SUCH AS SHADE . STRUCTURES, LANDSCAPING, SEATING AMENITIES, PUBLIC ART, AND OTHER 5 APPROPRIATE HUMAN -SCALED FEATURES. E) AT LEAST 25% OF THE LOT SHALL BE RESERVED AS NATURAL OR LANDSCAPED OPEN SPACE. F) LIGHTING: ALL LIGHTING SHALL BE FULLY SHIELDED. G) PARKING: VEHICULAR TRAFFIC USING THE MAIN ACCESS DRIVE(S) SHALL BE DIRECTED, BY DESIGN, AWAY FROM PEDESTRIAN PATHS OR OTHER AREAS OF HIGH PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY. H) SIGNS: ALL SIGNS SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH CHAPTER 28 SIGNS OF THE OVZCR. X i Ll i QC TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REPORT MEETING DATE: April 3, 2007 TO: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FROM: Matt Michels, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Public Hearing, OV9-07-02, The Planning Center, representing NCH Corporation, proposes a text amendment to the Permitted Uses and Development Standards for the CPI Land Use District within the Rancho Vistoso PAD to add Hotel and Motel to the permitted uses and allow for a maximum hotel height up to 75 feet. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant has made an application to amend the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development (PAD), as follows: • To include Hotel and Motel within the Permitted Uses for the CPI land use district and; • To allow a maximum building height of up to 75 feet from the finished grade to the top of parapet or top of mechanical penthouse within a specified portion of Neighborhood 3. The PAD, adopted in 1987, designates portions of Neighborhood 3, which is generally bounded by Big Wash on the west, Rancho Vistoso Boulevard on the north, Oracle Road on the east, and Tangerine Road on the south, and a portion of Neighborhood 2, located north of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard, as Commerce Park -Industrial (CPI). The associated zoning classification is T-P (Technology Park). These areas are intended for the development of major offices and research park facilities in a campus -like setting. Other secondary uses that primarily serve the CPI uses, such as restaurants and recreational facilities are allowed. Hotels are currently not allowed within the CPI district, but may be developed in the following districts: Town Center district, the Resort district, and within C-1, Commercial. The purpose of the proposed amendment is to allow for the development of a hotel, up to seventy-five (75') feet in height, on a parcel within the southeast portion of Innovation Corporate Center East (ICCE) in the southern portion of Neighborhood 3, along Tangerine Road. In an effort to be fair and consistent throughout the CPI district, hotels should be an allowable use on any CPI property. However, hotels should be limited to the CPI maximum building height of thirty-six (36') feet except within the far southern portion of Neighborhood 3. This proposed standard is discussed further on Page 2. Staff developed specific development standards for hotels within the CPI district. The proposed standards are intended to address property development standards and design issues that are needed to reduce the visual impact and ensure compatibility of hotels with surrounding land uses. Staff also recommends excluding the motels from the allowable uses in that they are typically less aesthetically appropriate to the CPI district and may be considered by some to be more nuisance generating and less appropriate for the CPI context than hotels. TORN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REPORT, OV9-07-02 Pape 2 BACKGROUND: The Development Standards are consistent with and in some cases exceed those of the OVZCR and the Rancho Vistoso PAD. The most significant deviation from the already established PAD standards is the maximum allowable height of 75 feet for hotels and motels within one -thousand (1,000) feet of Tangerine Road in the southern portion of Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 3. Staff's objective is to create standards that minimize the obtrusive visual impacts of hotels, especially a proposed 75-foot hotel in Innovation Corporate Center East (ICCE) through the following site development standards and guidelines: Location and Height of Hotels • Hotels and motels up to the CPI maximum height of 36' (44' on slopes from 15 to 25 percent) will be allowed throughout the CPI district. Staff recommends that hotels be restricted to T-P zoned areas (Neighborhood 3 and a portion of Neighborhood 2) where they will have best proximity to major transportation, medical, retail, office and technological park facilities. The applicant desires additional height to accommodate the development of a large (-200 room) hotel on the southeast corner of Innovation Corporate Center East (ICCE). The goal is to be no more visually intrusive than the existing hospital. The following table shows the height requirements of the proposed standards with those of the Northwest Medical Center -Oro Valley and the existing Rancho Vistoso PAD CPI standards: Facility Height Proposed Hotel Standards 75 ft Existing Hospital 74 ft Rancho Vistoso CPI 36-44 ft • Hotels over 36 feet will only be allowed in the southern portion of Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 3, within one -thousand (1,000) feet of Tangerine Road. The location east of Innovation Park Drive and immediately north of Tangerine Road is lower than other surrounding areas. The Northwest Medical Center, built in 2004, is nearly 74 feet tall yet the verticality is mitigated and de-emphasized by its lowered building site and by the surrounding higher topography. The requested height of 75 feet will not impede views or stand out as prominently as it might in other areas. Further, the proposed location of the 75-foot hotel is in excellent proximity to major transportation corridors (Oracle Road, Tangerine Road, and Innovation Park Drive), the Northwest Medical Center, technology firms such as Ventana Medical Systems, the Oro Valley Marketplace, and other businesses and offices. • The proposed 75-foot hotel will not impact the views of the homes on the various ridges in Rancho Vistoso to the north and west. The only neighborhood with any potential impact is Catalina Shadows to the south of Tangerine Road. Some of this neighborhood will be able to see a 75-foot building. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REPORT, OV9-07-02 Pa e 3 The visual impact is mitigated by the lower elevation of the site and the distance from the nearest residential use. The nearest home, in Catalina Shadows to the south, is approximately 2,200 feet or .42 miles. Setbacks • The required setback from Tangerine Road per the Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District is a minimum 4:1 setback to height ratio, which equates to a 300' setback for the proposed 75' building. This setback will be adequate to de-emphasize the hotel from Tangerine Road. The hospital complies with this standard. The proposed building setbacks for hotels in excess of 36 feet in height have been developed in a manner to ensure that the building is setback from major roadways a sufficient distance for aesthetics and to reduce the visual impact of the building mass from Tangerine Road and Innovation Park Drive. The building setbacks, as proposed, compared with the requirements of the OVZCR and Rancho Vistoso PAD, are shown in the following table: Front Side Rear Proposed 75' Hotel Standard 4:1 50 ft 75 ft OVZCR TP Zoning 35 ft 50 ft 50 ft Rancho Vistoso CPI 25 ft 20 ft 30 ft Proposed Development Standards and Guidelines for Hotels • Hotels shall incorporate contextually -appropriate Southwestern architectural design themes and elements. In keeping with the spirit of the Town's existing Southwestern design character, the use of appropriate architectural themes is an important element in creating a building that responds positively to the natural and built environment with a minimum amount of negative visual impacts. • Hotels shall blend harmoniously with the surroundings and not impose a visually -obtrusive impediment to the viewshed. Given the predominance of low-rise buildings in the Town, it is imperative that the hotel blend well into its context so that it does not "stick out" and diminish or disrupt surrounding views and the existing natural and man-made context of the area. The proposed hotel, as depicted, will not contribute to visual clutter or disturb existing views of Pusch Ridge, the Tortolita Mountains, and other natural features. • In an effort to avoid incompatible and visually -intrusive designs, typically corporate and franchise architecturally styles shall be avoided and must be approved by the DRB. This condition is intended to prevent the use of a potentially inappropriate "off the shelf' corporate or franchise designs. The DRB shall carefully scrutinize any proposal for a proposal of this height. • Because the top of the building may be visible from adjacent development or rights of way, consideration shall be given to all sides of the building, including the rooftop. The intent of the requirement is to ensure that the screening and treatment of nnechanicals is well integrated -and compatible with the primary architecture and not just a "tack on" or "afterthought." TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REPORT, OV9-07-02 Pa e 4 • Large expanses of glass are prohibited (i.e. glass curtain walls), except on the ground floor. The concern with large expanses of glass is the high reflectivity and lack of articulation and appropriate Southwestern style typical of glass -walled structures. • All glass and siding materials used must be low -reflectivity (<60%). The reflectivity value may be further reduced if there is glare or other reflective impacts on adjacent properties. This is intended to reduce glare and promote energy efficiency. This is especially important on a taller hotel, which could reflect glare over a greater distance than a more low-rise building. • All hotels shall utilize a muted color palate, with the primary objective to help the building to blend into its surroundings. Because the hotel will be more prominent due to its height, it is important that the colors be sufficiently subdued and muted. as not be a visual distraction. The existing hospital is a good example of judicious use of muted, non -ostentatious colors. • All rooftop mechanicals, including HVAC units and antennas shall utilize "5-sided screening" (including the top). The purpose of this requirement is to ensure that the roof of the hotel is adequately treated and is aesthetically pleasing. • At least 25% of the lot shall be reserved as natural or landscaped open space. The requirement of open space will help to mitigate the dominance of the hotel building on the site by providing attractive natural or landscaped areas. Landscaping • The area around the ground floor shall include pedestrian -scale features, such as shade structures, lush landscaping, seating amenities, public art, and other appropriate human -scaled features. The first floor area should be human -scaled, attractive, and comfortable for pedestrians and those interacting with the hotel on the ground level. The use of the aforementioned features will serve to achieve this aim. • For buildings in excess of 36 feet, a twenty (20') landscaped buffer shall be provided for areas around all four sides of the building. The rationale for the wider buffer is that taller buildings are more imposing and the additional buffer area will help to soften the buildings appearance and provide a more appropriately scaled buffer next to the building. • All lighting shall be shielded. This provision is intended to ensure that the hotel's lighting does not adversely impact adjacent uses or contribute to light pollution in the area. • Vehicular traffic using the main access drive(s) shall be directed, by design, away from pedestrian paths or other areas of high pedestrian activities. The purpose of this requirement is to maintain a safe and functional separation between pedestrian and vehicular movements. • All signs shall be in conformance with Chapter 28 Signs of the OVZCR. Without this standard, the applicant, in most cases, would need a waiver from the Rancho Vistoso PAD standards. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REPORT, OV9-07-02 Page 5 TRCOD/ORSCOD COMPLIANCE: The proposed hotel depicted in the application has been measured against the standards of the TRCOD and ORSCOD. The proposal will be able to meet all standards of TRCOD and ORSCOD. GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE: The following policies are notable for this PAD Amendment: Land Use Policy 1.3.2: The Town shall encourage new development to locate uses that depend on convenient transportation access (e.g., higher density residential and commercial) near major arterial streets. The area of the proposed hotel is in close proximity to Tangerine Road, Oracle Road, and hunovation Park Drive. There will be a SunTran transit center across Tangerine Road in the Oro Valley Marketplace, offering transit access to workers and patrons of the hotel. Transportation Special Area Policies —La Cholla-Tangerine, Guidelines for Commercial Development: More intense uses such as hotels and retail commercial shall be located closer to arterial street access points and away from existing less intense uses. The proposed location of a hotel in close proximity to Tangerine Road, Oracle Road, and Innovation Park Drive is consistent with this policy. Economic Development Policy 3.1.5: The Town shall continue its efforts to attract new high -end retail and service businesses, especially those in under -represented categories, in order to help reduce expenditure leakage. The proposed hotel use will provide a needed, complimentary use to the nearby hospital, medical facilities, Oro Valley Marketplace shopping center, and technology industries such as Ventana Medical Systems. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENT: All property owners within 600' of the owner's property, all CPI properties within Rancho Vistoso, and all HOAs within the Town have been notified of the public hearing in accordance with the Town notification requirements. No public comments have been received to date. The applicant will be holding a neighborhood meeting on March 291h, 2007. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING COl\-1MISSION REPORT, OV9-07-02 Page 6 SUMMARY OF FACTORS: Findings for 1. A 75-foot hotel in the defined area near Tangerine Road will not adversely impact views from surrounding properties. 2. The Northwest Medical Center -Oro Valley height is 74 feet from finished grade. The proposed specific development standards are intended to ensure that hotels will have no greater visual impact than the existing hospital. 3. The proposed hotel development standards address standards relating to compatibility in architecture, color, materials, and other standards related to making the project context -appropriate. 4. The southern one -thousand (1,000) feet of Neighborhood 3 is an excellent location for a hotel facility that will serve and compliment surrounding uses such as the hospital, technology industries, general offices, the Oro Valley Marketplace, and other businesses in the vicinity. 5. The proposed building site is currently below the grade of Tangerine Road. 6. The nearest home, in Catalina Shadows to the south, is approximately 2,200 feet or .42 miles. 7. The 75-foot height limit will be limited to the southern one -thousand (1,000) feet of Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 3. Factors Against 1. There will be some visual impact on residents of Catalina Shadows to the south, as well as from Tangerine Road and Oracle Road. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends conditional approval the Development Standards for the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development, Section 1.3.A, Office Park Development Standards, by adding Hotels to the permitted uses and by adding a new Section 2, Specific Property Development Standards for Hotels. SUGGESTED MOTIONS: The Planning and Zoning Commission may wish to consider one of the following motions: I move to recommend [approval OR approval with conditions] of OV9-07-02, amending the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development, Section 1.3.A, Office Park Development Standards, by adding Hotels to the permitted uses and by adding a new Section 2, Specific Property Development Standards for Hotels, said standards being described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto. 0 I move to recommend that the Town Council deny OV9-07-02, the request to amend the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development, Section 1.3.A, Office Park Development Standards, by adding Hotels to the permitted uses and by adding a new Section 2, Specific Property Development Standards for Hotels, said standards being described in Exhibit "A". TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REPORT, OV9-07-02 Pa e 7 Attachments: Exhibit "A" —Proposed Amendment to Rancho Vistoso PAD Section 1.3 Attachment 1—Vicinity Map of Rancho Vistoso Neighborhoods 3 and 5 Attachment 2—Area Map for 75-foot Hotel Limit i Sarah S. More, Planning and Zoning Director Hill Attachement #1 T J 2 74. ` S rlt x�+eN•^'"'T11S;�s 4. ° T /1� f y`'S' `s ,j (•, �•.I° "rt it 1 'f �k F �� ` � r� t r,. r. 7n .-. �:: � 1 `+ , sy`.J 1�.°+".: l � a G tir ". >•�i '�'✓? h t2 i !� °�.1:. d 1� : ` .} r"•3 t '.� s M1: t� 'S°q�T. . N F1�1T r•, a��J r �t•t,• '�} µ.P �J i 1� �t"• "y.; e lAn�7.}�..Ii�� 1' ..�0 f�, �' - � )q rid • � y_ � � �.J . ,/' yw. i .f,° � � .. ' k 4,,.'/ �.. 3!�`;tr F ;.� �,t .. j � r "'.1*� i. y,...G`"'n"T r� e „�i _ . .! t pn, L 7. * I � 5+rp 1. : ° .�•/' 'y,t �}•,7 ,Y d� . tx" 5 �, t�'' 1a .��sy �,�* '� t- s � i%+•�M, •�r'.,syr�.a}� � ''4.•{�r. �. '� t� nti,� �j, li �f. � t•N, _ ` � •�r 7 ,�' in �` .-'k{�"14`w''_T�; � � ''' i s i•,•' „�> a;�. a tt 4.�j+ ...� c"a1 qQ,,� r�'t3. ° �C.�f"�'�� r..u�t�txp y} : ��� � � y J. r t y�,,,'r „�; rie, � ' 'G ;�-�•�'�e�'� F y• r Y•�i •f°k '' �� v° } i L i`��;-',� Y 4 Y f 'i- � F `�• "�t."fi•.��4'� i t .f (•�j•ip.� yr� i0if � :'.t►1 � t�N,S«�`r� 'y'^ .r��i �•I,( s'�� 1 t•t! ° � .. J+ , �,.r• �� ° � +'� r �"?� 1 +S'" 4,, RJ +� 7: + !{n�y�ra � `.. w.,t`( j " r 'f. i .lr r r i3lk ., +fix?yrr�,a`rry�.+r{" } •` j�JY}'/ ",f:-, �a7.�'AZ' a dw. ♦r' j '},! a�+•,"1V'+r''�. �� t Pi�:`Ar r i r.'1•p.�. + .• h w •s +. fir+•' 'a,,,ti>,� °:�� r •u t R�� ti R , �M .j� i f't R�1n"�+�.s' t� / . ..,4rttr a 'y r,,p [. i� � ( � . t .t a a.r t.ra '" �,�� v 4 *, 'S•, ayti{ r t r'��'/ ,��,+g �ya� .i i ��. Y� ham.. • ! � rK •t'��7�Mtr � rr jj�ylxx'i,�y1' r)*"raZ'4y'�� � '>9' �.�a.�fsn�+F. r+'1�'P� vM, .7 ry 'J•.Ix .. a .r���}r f )�`� t� `�i,J „}"���+ru�frl'rY f it/. ^ "" 1•' •yam t4 1 • iJ�%� } e rr�� 4•rit ��1 'Y ,xA a t. r•+v�;}1 ��t "•t {'.. 'trli'y `V�' 7;,1•��''F� s �' -=�t�p� �Y � f ) i ,it•; ) i «• ��5 t JL.%�, { t t �`s a�.eti r• jy�€i �.�iu s�r•t t+[? ����i} � ��'�•Y>a,.� ` �. '. � •,. r` l: r. !,'as w' i '�'•til.a .� k t.: '".E+Lw-3.�5�" ii�.'!'�,5 ° . / % r ! Sri ��•r/ rr,�// i,///! X ,�� . .//' /.• / r' ,/:• . i�%r.'•,./j/%fir/�! "/ ,ri i' ayr`riilTss II y �,w.VONA ':.J�. �'`;:t,, �. y,..: �-: 7C,.r .t}� .. °.Y#vJ, 1.. t ",. 'T el�•r;-�,�4`��1.t L�l.-'°.�Lh �...1�'+f't��i:r:= ��� ?� ° DRAFT MINUTES ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR SESSION July 12, 2007 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM 1. Call to Order at 6:00 p.m. 2. Roll Call PRESENT: Chair Doug McKee Vice Chair Teree Bergman Commissioner Bill Adler Commissioner Ray Paolino Commissioner Clark Reddin Commission Honey Pivirotto (joined meeting at 6:12 p.m.) ABSENT: Commissioner Pete Bistany 3. Call to the Audience opened at 6:02 p.m. Pat Kinsman, 11671 N. Europa Place.,said Oro Valley's goal needs to be to design projects that minimize impact and protects native plant and wildlife. Call to the audience closed at 6:05 p.m. Chair Mckee requested an order change in the agenda. Hearing no objection Chair McKee moved Item 7 before Item 5. 4. Approval of the June 5, 2007, Planning and Zoning Commission regular meeting minutes. MOTION: Commissioner Adler MOVED to approve the June 5, 2007, Planning and Zoning Commission minutes as submitted. Commissioner Reddin seconded the motion. MOTION carried, (5:0). (Commissioner Pivirotto was not present at this time.) 7. Public Hearing: OV9-07-002A, The Planning Center, representing NCH Corporation/Transwest Properties, proposes a text amendment to Section 24.1.B.1.b.i of the Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District in the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised and to amend Policy 9 for Neighborhood 3 of the Rancho Vistoso PAD. These amendments are to allow for a 185-foot building setback for a proposed hotel, on one specific parcel, Parcel # 223- 02-021 D. Bob Conant, Planning Center, presented the request for a reduction in the setback, which is currently 4:1. The developer is asking for flexibility. Discussion followed regarding: - Setback relief - Intrusiveness of proposal - Size of hotel - ADOT taking additional 100' - Clarification of measurement from roadway to building - Visual impact - Hospital setting a precedent - Number of stories allowed under current code - Where setbacks are measured from. Ms. More stated that the applicant's intent is to take the height issue to the Council. Matt Michels, Senior Planner, gave the staff report, and stated that the proposal would not be any more intrusive. Staff looked at the Town's economic development, and feedback shows this proposal is needed and wanted. Mr. Michels said the primary intent of the setback requirement is to preserve the integrity of the scenic corridor and to not have visual intrusion. Chair Mckee asked how many stories could be built under the current code. PUBLIC HEARING OPENED Joe Hornat, resident, supports the location of the hotel but is concerned that the view will be obscured. Zev Cywan, resident, said it appears that a request for a text amendment in this manner would be inappropriate. Dorothy Bowers, resident, agreed with the previous two speakers and objected to the hotel proposal. Kathleen Pastryk, resident, stated Oro Valley is a beautiful small town and we care about building height. Wayne Krouse, resident, showed a slide depicting dimensions of the slope, grade and building height. The notification required has not been met. The facts are conflicting. He submitted his research for the record. Art Segal, resident, asked why the hotel has to be 75 feet. Bill Gardner, resident, was opposed to the applicant's proposal because there appears to be discrepancies. 2 Bob Peck, resident, has seen a disregard for what the Town stands for. Judy McDonald, resident, questioned why staff offered an answer to a question that was not supposed to be a part of the discussion. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED Commissioner Adler stated that Commission Members respect staff at the highest level. The Commission and Staff sometimes differ when it comes to the interpretation. The Code and the Plan are somewhat subjective. He sometimes differs from staff on how the Code applies. He said staff should not be depicted as anything other than community interested and community oriented. He does feel that the 4:1 ratio setback should be retained. The number of feet involved is directly related to the height. Although the Commissioner has already decided the height at a previous meeting, the height comes into this discussion because of the ratio. The Commission recommended to the Council in April that the hotels are permitted, as long as they comply with the PAD height limit of 36 feet. Therefore, he will make the following motion. MOTION: Commissioner Adler MOVED that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend to Council that the 4:1 ratio as reflected in the Oro Valley Zoning Code be retained as it relates to construction in the Tangerine Scenic Corridor. Commissioner Pivirotto seconded the motion. Discussion: Commissioner Adler said that means they can build a hotel there and the setback would be 144 feet if the height was 36 feet, so they would get relief. Vice Chair Bergman will support the motion because the setback request is tied intergrally to the height requirement that we already recommended against. The Commission is not a deciding body. She commended the staff and stated they are very professional and capable. Their job is difficult and complex and they work hard. The Town is lucky to have them. Commissioner Paolino will support the motion. The request for the reduced setback is clearly related to the size and height of the hotel, which is clearly in violation to the current code. The Commission cannot make exceptions and must remain consistent. Chair Mckee will support the motion because of the precedent setting nature of the proposal. If you look at the arguments for giving this what amount to a height variance, they are using the precedent of the hospital as one of the main reasons. If we grant another one, there will be other requests and there will be two precedents. MOTION carried (6:0). Recess: 7:15 p.m. to 7:26 p.m. 3 5. Public Hearing: OV9-05-06, The applicant requests approval of a rezoning from R1-144 to R1-20, located on the northwest corner of La Cholla Boulevard and Naranja Drive. The subdivision lots will range in size from 16,000 - 36,000 square feet. The property is 132 acres in size and will consist of 118 single family homes. Applicant Paul Oland reviewed the following: TRS Custom Homes Site plan and location Rezoning request to R-120 Significant Resource Areas Lot Sizes Density Project Disturbance Riparian Area and Open Space Recreation Area The applicant met with Amphi School District and the Town. Glover Road right of way is owned by Amphi and they have agreed to dedicate 30 feet; the developer will dedicate the other 50 feet necessary. The developer will participate in the design and improvement of Glover Road. The signal on La Cholla is on the RTA schedule. No additional right of way is needed at Naranja. The developer has agreed to do a multi- use path. The applicant has not received a request from Public Works to put a third lane on Naranja Drive. David Ronquillo, Senior Planner, gave the staff report. Paul Keesler, OV Development Review Manager, reviewed the following for La Cholla, Glover and Naranja Roads: Traffic impacts and analysis Existing average daily trips (ADT) Impacts of traffic RTA widening schedule Safety requests Discussion following regarding: - Lower density - Dedication of Glover Road to Oro Valley - "Fair share" - Tucson Water facility Attorney Andrews said the Town could suggest conditional language saying the zoning approval would require the developer to acquire adequate right of way, not listing specifics of Amphi School District or the Developer, and include the Town will not participate in the reconstruction of the roads. Therefore, the zoning could undo itself if the negotiations fail. PUBLIC HEARING OPENED 4 Linda Snodgrass, resident, was opposed to anything smaller than 3.3 acres because animals suffer and getting onto Naranja will be impossible. Tim Milburn, resident, said the neighbors met with the developer and recommended a lower density. He agreed with Mrs. Snodgrass about the animals suffering. Traffic is a problem. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED Commissioner Adler said General Plan designations when made are often not site specific. The significant resource create an environmentally sensitive area between the riparian areas, not within them. Lower density in that area was necessary. He opined that though the proposal is compliant with the General Plan it does not comply with the purpose of the Significant Resource Area (SRA)which was overlaid, not at the same time, but subsequently. The SRA was overlaid in order to establish a sensitivity in that area. He would not support the rezoning. We need to consider the values of what the property represents. MOTION: Commissioner Adler MOVED to deny this proposed rezoning at the density levels proposed. Motion failed for lack of a second. MOTION: Vice Chair Bergman MOVED to approve OV9-05-06, the WLB Group request for approval of a rezoning from R1-144 to R1-20 with the conditions in the revised Attachment submitted, adding into condition #1 that the Town will not participate in the cost of the reconstruction of Glover Road. Commissioner Reddin seconded the motion. Discussion: Vice Chair Bergman commented that normally there is clear separation between deciding what is appropriate zoning on the property and what is the appropriate development. The motion is to approve the rezoning but the details of the layout of the lots and some of the other development factors still need to be negotiated as part of the subdivision process. We are approving the land use concept and a rezoning. Chair McKee will support the motion. This is a high quality subdivision which will be good for the Town and neighbors. The neighbors to the west may prefer less density but the lots along the west side are good size. The applicant has tried to maintain our standards and although the significant overlay is very complicated, it is designed to give the developer some leeway in how he lays the lots out by saving some areas and squeezing others. He has met the intent of the significant overlay. Commissioner Paolino will reluctantly support the motion. He shared many of Commissioner Adler's reservations, but believes it has minimally met the requirements of the General Plan in terms of the land use. Commissioner Reddin added his support. He will be a neighbor of this area and had concerns, but when he looked at the concept of what they are proposing, it is what this community desparately needs. Looking at where it has been placed between two schools, it is a quality product. 5 Motion carried, (5:1) Commissioner Adler voting no for reasons stated above, prior to the motion being made. Recess: 8:26 p.m. to 8:32 p.m. 6. Public Hearing: OV11-06-02, General Plan Amendment for portions of Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 3, generally bounded on the north by Rancho Vistoso Boulevard, on the east by Oracle Road, on the south by Tangerine Road, and on the west by the Big Wash. Chairman Mckee stated this item was for discussion only. Another meeting will be held tentatively on August 14th at 6:00 p.m. at Sun City Recreation Center. Mr. Paul Olund, WLB Group, reviewed the following: Existing Rancho Vistoso PAD Existing encroachments Existing facilities Current land use configuration Proposed linear park and trail connections Proposed commercial area Proposed configuration Traffic Light General Plan Map Conceptual design of the park History and General Plan findings Market demand Commissioner Adler requested a Study Session be scheduled and that the applicant provide policy statements before the Study Session and put environmental compatability in writing. Chair Mckee requested a history of the levee and an inventory of parcels which are available for employment centers for both the proposed amendment and existing plan. Matt Michels, OV Senior Planner, gave the staff report. David Welsh, OV Economic Developer Administrator, stated this is one of, if not the most important economic development priorities in the Town. Three components of the Economic Development Strategy are: Retention and recruitment of businesses in retail development, tourism/resort, and high tech and bio tech professional level employment. This proposal supports the final component of that strategy and allows people to live, work and play in Oro Valley. Discussion followed regarding: - Existing inventory of available parcels - Proposed parcels - Open space versus land to accomodate the level of businesses desired - The need for recruitment and retention - Natural resources as a part of economic well being 0 - The need for more neighborhood commercial property - The need for flexibility Mr. Michels read a statement from Phillip Saletta, OV Water Utility Director, that the Town does not have plans to develop CAP water recharge in Big Wash. PUBLIC HEARING OPENED Brian Catts, resident, asked that the Town develop more commercial/industrial facilities for start-up or growing businesses and stated he was neither in favor or opposed to the proposal. Bill Garner, resident, was concerned about the environmental and traffic impact. Lyra Done, resident, planned on attending the study session proposed. Art Segal, resident, had difficulty finding the notice that was placed on the site. Wayne Crouse, resident,asked the Town to follow the policies and procedures for notification in the Zoning Code. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED Ms. More stated that the notification procedures for HOA's have been remedied and in the future we will consistently, for zoning code amendments and General Plan amendments, notify every HOA representative in the Town. 8. Discussion of August Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. A study session will be held August 7th. Ms. More recommended a decision be made regarding a public hearing on August 13 so that proper noticing can begin. 9. Future Agenda Items Ms. More stated she would like to go over the work plan in a future Study Session. 10. Planning Update The Town of Oro Valley is hosting the Governors Economic Development Conference on August 15-17th at the Hilton. 11. Adjournment. MOTION: Commissioner Paolino MOVED to adjourn. Commissioner Adler seconded the motion. Motion carried (6:0). Prepared by: Deanna Ruiz for Diane Chapman, Office Specialis VA TOWN OF ORO VALLEY '� � �°'�EN i el, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REPORT MEETING DATE: July 12, 2007 TO: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FROM: Matt Michels, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Public Hearing: OV9-07-02A, The Planning Center, representing NCH Corporation/Transwest Properties, proposes text amendments to Policy 9 for Neighborhood 3 of the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development (PAD) and to Section 24.1.B.l.b.i of the Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District in the OVZCR to allow for a reduced building setback for a proposed hotel. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant has made an application to amend the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development (PAD) and the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised (OVZCR), as follows: • To allow for a reduced 185-foot building setback from the property line/right-of-way line. At the April 3, 2007 P&Z Commission meeting, the following items were presented and discussed: • To include Hotel within the Permitted Uses for the CPI land use district in the Rancho Vistoso PAD. • To allow a maximum building height of up to 75 feet from the finished grade to the top of parapet on the applicant's property. • Specific development standards for hotels within the CPI district. The proposed standards are intended to address property development standards and design issues that are needed to reduce the visual impact and ensure compatibility of the proposed hotel with surrounding land uses. The request to include hotels in the CPI land use district and the additional height was brought before the Planning and Zoning Commission at the April 3, 2007 meeting. The recommendation was for approval of the proposed development standards for hotels but denial of the requested 75 foot height. In addition, the proposal does not meet the existing 4:1 Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District (TRCOD) setback standard. For this reason, the applicant has amended their request to include a reduced building setback from the property line/Tangerine Road right-of-way. Further, the current proposal is site -specific for the increased height and reduced setback. The previously -presented development standards for hotels have been amended to reflect this. The purpose of the proposed amendment is to allow for the development of a hotel, up to seventy-five (75') feet in height, on a parcel within the southeast portion of Innovation Corporate Center (ICC) in the southern portion of Neighborhood 3, along Tangerine Road. In an effort to be fair and consistent throughout the CPI district, hotels should be an allowable use on any CPI property. However, hotels would be limited to the CPI maximum building height of thirty-six (36') feet except for the applicant's property. The original proposal included a 1,000-foot area from Tangerine Road northward that would allow a maximum building height of 75 feet. However, concerns were raised that this was too broad and may allow for a proliferation of taller hotels along this corridor. The current request for additional height is F:\OV\OV9\2007\9-07-02A\Reports\P&Zreport v2.doc TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REPORT, OV9-07-02A Page 2 of 5 site specific. Further discussion of the proposed height standard is contained in the Location and Height of Hotels section of this report. BACKGROUND: The proposed text amendments to Policy 9 for Neighborhood 3 of the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development (PAD) and to Section 24.1.B.l.b.i of the Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District in the OVZCR to allow for a reduced building setback for a proposed hotel are intended to accommodate a 75-foot hotel with a reduced setback from the Tangerine Road right-of-way. The request is site -specific for the proposed hotel to be located on the applicants parcel. Location and Height of Hotels • Hotels up to the CPI maximum height of 36' (44' on slopes from 15 to 25 percent) will be allowed throughout the CPI district. Staff recommends that hotels be restricted to T-P zoned areas where they will have best proximity to major transportation, medical, retail, office and technological park facilities. The applicant desires additional height to accommodate the development of a large (-290 room) hotel on the southeast corner of ICC. The proposed hotel will be no more visually intrusive than the existing hospital. The following table shows the height requirements of the proposed standards with those of the Northwest Medical Center -Oro Valley and the existing Rancho Vistoso PAD CPI standards: Facility Height Proposed Hotel Standards 75 ft Existing Hospital 74 ft Rancho Vistoso CPI 36-44 ft • A Hotel over 36 feet will only be allowed on the applicant's parcel (Parcel #223-02-021D). The location east of Innovation Park Drive and immediately north of Tangerine Road is slightly lower than other surrounding areas. The Northwest Medical Center, built in 2004, is nearly 74 feet tall yet the verticality of the structure is mitigated and de-emphasized by its lowered building site and by the surrounding higher topography. The requested height of 75 feet for the hotel will not impede views or stand out as prominently as it might in other areas. The proposed hotel is much smaller in scale and the overall mass of the structure will be much less than the hospital. Further, the proposed location of the 75-foot hotel is in proximity to major transportation corridors (Oracle Road, Tangerine Road, and Innovation Park Drive), the Northwest Medical Center, technology firms such as Ventana Medical Systems, the Oro Valley Marketplace, which is across the street, and other businesses and offices. F:\OV\OV9\2007\9-07-02A\Reports\P&Zreport v2.doc TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REPORT, OV9-07-02A Pau 3 of 5 Setbacks • The required setback from Tangerine Road per the Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District is a minimum 4:1 setback to height ratio, which equates to a 300' setback from the Tangerine Road right-of-way/property line for the proposed 75-foot building. Typically the Tangerine Road right-of-way is 300 feet (150 feet on each side of the centerline). There is additional right-of-way in front of this property in excess of the "standard" 300 feet. The extra property is owned by ADOT and is considered public right-of-way for purposes of determining setbacks. The additional property was obtained for the purpose of constructing a grade -separated interchange at Innovation Park Drive and Tangerine Road. However, there are no current plans to construct said interchange. • It should be noted that the hospital complies with the 4:1 setback to height ratio standard. The hospital does have, however, a much larger parcel (over 20 acres) in order to meet this standard. The applicant's property is much smaller (approx. 7.5 acres) and the proposed hotel would have the main parking field in the front (away from Tangerine Rd.) which is more aesthetically pleasing along the Tangerine Corridor. • The proposed building setbacks for the proposed 75-foot hotel have been developed in a manner to ensure that the building is setback from major roadways a sufficient distance for aesthetics and to reduce the visual impact of the building mass from Tangerine Road and Innovation Park Drive. The building setbacks, as proposed, compared with the requirements of the OVZCR and Rancho Vistoso PAD, are shown in the following table: Front Side I Rear Proposed 75' Hotel Standard 185 ft 50 ft 75 ft OVZCR TP Zoning 35 ft 50 ft 50 ft Rancho Vistoso CPI 25 ft 20 ft 30 ft TRCOD/ORSCOD COMPLIANCE: The proposed hotel depicted will be in compliance with the standards of TRCOD and ORSCOD, with the exception of the 4:1 height -to -building setback ratio along Tangerine Road (Section 24.1.E-2.b). The applicant has requested an exception to this standard by amending Section 24.1.B.l.b.i of the OVZCR and Policy 9 for Neighborhood 3 of the Rancho Vistoso PAD, as indicated on Exhibit "A". PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENT: All property owners within 600' of the owner's property, all CPI properties within Rancho Vistoso, and all HOAs within the Town have been notified of the public hearing in accordance with the Town notification requirements. F:\OV\OV9\2007\9-07-02A\Reports\P&Zreport v2.doc TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REPORT, OV9-07-02A Page 4 of 5 There have been several inquiries requesting further explanation and clarification regarding the proposal. However, no formal public comments have been received to date. The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on March 29`h, 2007. Approximately 15 residents were in attendance. The issues discussed included the nature of the proposal, the appropriateness of the proposed use for the site, the possible viewshed impacts of the hotel. SUMMARY OF FACTORS: Findings for 1. There is excess ADOT-owned right-of-way in front of the applicant's property. 2. The visual impact of the hotel, even with the reduced setback, will not adversely impact views of surrounding mountains and the visual impact will be less than that of the hospital. 3. The proposed amendments, including the reduced setback from the Tangerine Road right-of-way and the 75-foot height limit, will be limited to the applicant's property (Parcel #223-02-02 1 D) in the southern portion of Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 3. Factors A ag inst 1. There will be some visual impact on residents of Catalina Shadows to the south, as well as from Tangerine Road and Oracle Road. However the primary visual impact on Catalina Shadows will be created by the Oro Valley Marketplace. 2. The proposed setback reduction from the 4:1 TRCOD standard will not be consistent with other development along Tangerine Road. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of a text amendment to Section 24.1.B. Lb.i of the Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District in the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised, to amend Policy 9 for Neighborhood 3 of the Rancho Vistoso PAD to allow for a 185-foot building setback for a proposed hotel. In addition, staff requests that the motion include the previously -discussed proposal, as clarification to the Town Council, to amend the Permitted Uses and Development Standards for the CPI Land Use District within the Rancho Vistoso PAD to add Hotel to the permitted uses and allow for a maximum height for a proposed hotel up to 75 feet, and by adding a new Section 2, Specific Property Development Standards for Hotels. SUGGESTED MOTIONS: The Planning and Zoning Commission may wish to consider one of the following motions: I move to recommend [approval, approval with conditions, OR denial] of OV9-07-02A, a text amendment to Section 24.1.B.l.b.i of the Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District in the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised and an amendment to Policy 9 for Neighborhood 3 of the Rancho Vistoso PAD to allow for a 185-foot building setback for a proposed hotel; an amendment to the Permitted Uses and Development Standards for the CPI Land Use District within the Rancho Vistoso PAD to add Hotel to the permitted uses and allow for a maximum height for F:\OV\OV9\2007\9-07-02A\Reports\P&Zreport v2.doc TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REPORT, OV9-07-02A Page 5 of 5 a proposed hotel up to 75 feet; and by adding a new Section 2, Specific Property Development Standards for Hotels, said standards being described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto. Attachments: Attachment 1—Site Plan Attachment 2—Site Section Attachment 2—Topographical Site Plan Exhibit "A" —Proposed Amendments to Section 24. LB.l.b.i, OVZCR and Policy 9 for Neighborhood 3 of the Rancho Vistoso PAD Exhibit "B' —Proposed Amendment to Rancho Vistoso PAD Section 1.3 S ah S. More, Planning and Zoning Director F:\OV\OV9\2007\9-07-02A\Reports\P&Zreport v2.doc A-F Ac_ H M:uWj- "lb I EXHIBIT "A", OV9-07-02A TRCOD/RV PAD Amendment Proposal NOTE: The text to be added is BOLD IN ALL CAPS 1. Amend the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised (OVZCR) Chapter 24 Supplementary District Regulations, Section 24.1 Tangerine Corridor Overlay District (TRCOD) Section 24.1.B.1.b.i as follows: b. Exceptions. i. The adopted Rancho Vistoso PAD ... , except that the allowances of 2.c shall be applicable. ADDITIONALLY, THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 24.1.E.2.13 SHALL BE MODIFIED AS PROVIDED IN THE RANCHO VISTOSO PAD, NEIGHBORHOOD #3, POLICY 9 (AS AMENDED). 2. Amend the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development (PAD) Neighborhood #3 Policy 9 as follows: 9. Tangerine Road: Access from Tangerine Road will be solely from the interchange designated between Big Wash Bridge and Oracle Road (Tucson -Florence Highway, U.S. 89). PIMA COUNTY TAX PARCEL #223-02-021D SHALL BE SUBJECT TO A 185-FOOT BUILDING SETBACK FROM THE TANGERINE ROAD PROPERTY LINE. Exhibit "B", OV9-07-02A Proposed Amendment to Rancho Vistoso PAD Section 1.3 Land Use/Additional Material NOTE: The text to be added is BOLD IN ALL CAPS The text to be deleted has been StFUGk thFeugl4 A. Office Park Development Standards The Office Park development standards of height, setbacks, open space and yards are listed in the following pages. An illustrative section follows the standards and graphically portrays the conditions that the modified standards will produce. 1. OFFICE/RESEARCH PARK (CPI) a. Purpose: This district is intended to provide for administrative, research and development and office activities in a campus -like setting. All uses shall be of a non -nuisance type and shall blend into the natural desert landscape. This district is to provide employment near residential areas. b. Permitted Uses: 1) As allowed in Article 8-3, Section 8-303, O.V.Z.C.R., T-P Technological Park District. 2) Other uses: a) Administrative and professional offices; b) Apparel (clothing and other products manufactured from textiles): c) Art needlework and handweaving; d) Manufacture of: i) Cameras and other photographic equipment and supplies, ii) Dentures and drugs. iii) Jewelry, iv) Leather products: Including shoes and machine belting (excluding tanning). v) Luggage, vi) Musical instruments, vii) Orthopedic and medical supplies (such as artificial limbs, braces, supports and stretchers), viii) Small paper products (such as envelopes, stationery, bags, boxes and wallpaper printing), ix) Plastic products: But not including the processing of the raw material, x) Precision instruments (such as optical, medical and drafting), A) Silverware, plate and sterling. xii) Sporting and athletic equipment, xiii) Toys; e) Manufacture and assembly of electrical and electronic products; f) Manufacture and packaging of beverage products; g) Manufacture and service of data systems; h) Ink mixing and packaging and inked ribbons; i) Laboratories: Medical, dental, research, experimental and testing; D Printing, newspaper publishing and binding: including engraving and photo- engraving; k) Soap and detergents: Packaging only 1) Warehousing; m) Wholesale business and storage provided there is no outdoor storage. n) Any other manufacturing uses that are similar to those listed above; o) Recreational vehicle storage area in neighborhood 3 only, and further, that the exact location of the of said storage areas be approved by the Planning Commission; (Ord.89-5) P) HOTELS: 1) RETAIL OPERATIONS, SUCH AS GIFT SHOPS ARE PERMITTED WHEN THE USE IS ACCESSORY TO A HOTEL. SUCH USES SHALL BE ENTERED FROM THE INTERIOR OF THE HOTEL. II) CONFERENCE AND MEETING FACILITIES ARE PERMITTED WHEN ACCESSORY TO A HOTEL. p Q) The Town Council may add other uses as necessary in addition to the established list. 1) Permitted secondary uses: The following uses shall be also permitted: a) Restaurant facilities, provided such use is accessory to A dial facility; b) Child care centers; c) Banking or financial facilities; d) Recreational facilities: i) Common areas and recreational facilities shall be located so as to be readily accessible to employees of the firm; ii) Recreational facilities for the use of the Office park employees are encouraged; iii) Facilities may include golf courses, tennis courts, health clubs, basketball courts, and other similar amenities; C. PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (1). GENERAL Property Development Standards: A4) Minimum Property Size: None 63) Building Height: No building shall exceed 36 feet, except on slopes between 15 and 25 percent, the height shall not exceed 44 feet. C3) Setbacks: a) Front Yard: 25 feet b) Side Yard: 20 feet or common wall. c) Rear Yard: 30 feet D4) Distance Between Buildings: There shall be a minimum of 10 feet between buildings. E5) Landscaping Requirements: Any part of the lot not required for buildings, structures, loading and . vehicular access, pedestrian walks and hard surface areas shall be landscaped according to the Rancho Vistoso or Sun City Vistoso Design Guidelines as applicable. A minimum of 15 percent of the net total area must be landscaped. F6) A six foot high masonry wall and 4 foot wide landscape screen shall be installed along the perimeter of the recreational vehicle storage area to be permitted in neighborhood 3 only. (Ord. 89-5) G7-) Site Coverage: The building site coverage cannot exceed 50 percent. H6) Open Space Requirement: None, See 7) Site Coverage 19) Floor Area Ratio: None, See 7) Site Coverage and 2) Building Height '3 Parking for office uses: On -site parking is to be provided at the ratio of a minimum of one space per 250 square feet. (2). SPECIFIC PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR HOTELS A) THE GENERAL PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN SECTION C(1) APPLY. B) BUILDING HEIGHT: 1) NO BUILDING SHALL EXCEED THIRTY-SIX (36') FEET, EXCEPT FOR PARCEL #223-02-021D, WHICH HAS A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF SEVENTY- FIVE (75') FEET. 2) NO OTHER BUILDING SHALL EXCEED 36 FEET, EXCEPT ON SLOPES BETWEEN 15 AND 25 PERCENT, THE HEIGHT SHALL NOT EXCEED FORTY-FOUR (44') FEET. C) SETBACKS FOR BUILDINGS IN EXCESS OF 36 FEET IN HEIGHT: 1) FRONT YARD: THE MINIMUM SETBACK FROM TANGERINE ROAD SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 148 FEET FROM THE PROPERTY LINE/EDGE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY. 2) SIDE YARD: 50 FEET 3) REAR YARD: 75 FEET. C) ARCHITECTURE: 1) THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SHALL BE REGIONALLY APPROPRIATE TO THE SOUTHWESTERN CONTEXT. USE OF STANDARDIZED CORPORATE IDENTIFICATION THEMES INTEGRATED INTO THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SHALL BE AVOIDED AND IS SUBJECT TO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD (DRB) APPROVAL. 2) BUILDINGS SHALL UTILIZE A MUTED COLOR PALATE TO HELP 4 THE BUILDING BLEND MORE SEAMLESSLY INTO ITS SURROUNDINGS. 3) THE ELEVATION DESIGN OF THE BUILDING(S) SHALL PROVIDE DESIGN CHARACTER AND DETAILING ON ALL FOUR (4) SIDES. ALL SCREENING DEVICES USED FOR ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE COMPATIBLE IN DESIGN AND COLOR TO THE REST OF THE STRUCTURE. ROOFTOP MECHANICALS SHALL BE SHIELDED FROM VIEW ON ALL FIVE (5) SIDES. 4) BUILDING ENTRIES SHALL BE CLEARLY ARTICULATED AND SHALL PROVIDE CLEARLY ARTICULATED PEDESTRIAN SCALE BY THE USE OF LOW LEVEL DETAIL, TEXTURES, COVERED OR RECESSED AREAS. 5) EXCESSIVE EXPANSES OF GLASS, ESPECIALLY CURTAIN WALLS, AND UNFINISHED SURFACES ARE PROHIBITED. GLASS AREA SHOULD NOT DOMINATE THE SURFACE AREA, EXCEPT AS MAY BE DESIRED ON THE GROUND LEVEL. FACADES SHALL BE BROKEN UP BY RECESSES, OFF -SETS OR OTHER ARTICULATION AT REGULAR INTERVALS. VARYING ROOF LINES OR HEIGHTS ARE ENCOURAGED. 6) ALL GLASS AND SIDING MATERIALS USED MUST BE LOW -REFLECTIVITY (<60%). THE REFLECTIVITY VALUE MAY BE FURTHER REDUCED IF THERE IS GLARE OR OTHER REFLECTIVE IMPACTS ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES. D) LANDSCAPING: 1) ALL LANDSCAPING INCLUDING TRASH AND REFUSE COLLECTION AREAS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED SECTION 27.6. 2) FOR BUILDINGS IN EXCESS OF 36 FEET, A TWENTY (20') LANDSCAPED BUFFER SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR AREAS AROUND ALL FOUR SIDES OF THE BUILDING, EXCEPT FOR LOADING ZONE AREAS. 3) THE AREA AROUND THE GROUND FLOOR SHALL INCLUDE PEDESTRIAN -SCALE FEATURES, SUCH AS SHADE STRUCTURES, LANDSCAPING, SEATING AMENITIES, PUBLIC ART, AND OTHER APPROPRIATE HUMAN -SCALED FEATURES. E) AT LEAST 25% OF THE LOT SHALL BE RESERVED AS NATURAL OR LANDSCAPED OPEN SPACE. F) LIGHTING: ALL LIGHTING SHALL BE FULLY SHIELDED. G) PARKING: VEHICULAR TRAFFIC USING THE MAIN ACCESS DRIVE(S) SHALL BE DIRECTED, BY DESIGN, AWAY FROM PEDESTRIAN PATHS OR OTHER AREAS OF HIGH PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY. H) SIGNS: ALL SIGNS SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH CHAPTER 28 SIGNS OF THE OVZCR. Wi % Transwest Partners LLC TRCOD/RV PAD Amendment Proposal A. Amendment Provisions. 1. Amend the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised (OVZCR) Chapter 24 Supplementary District Regulations, Section 24.1 Tangerine Corridor Overlay District (TRCOD) Section 24.1.B.l.b(i) as follows (amendment shown in bold, double - underline): b. Exceptions. i. The adopted Rancho Vistoso PAD .... except that the allowances of 2.c shall be applicable. Additionally, the requirements of Section 24.1.E.2.b shall be modified as provided in the Rancho Vistoso PAD. Neighborhood #3. Policy 9 (as amendedl. 2. Amend the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development (PAD) Neighborhood #3 Policy 9 as follows (amendment shown in bold, double -underline): 9. Tangerine Road: Access from Tangerine Road will be solely from the interchange designated between Big Wash Bridge and Oracle Road (Tucson - Florence Highway, U.S. 89). Pima County Tax Parcel #223-02-021D, owned by Transwest Partners LLC, shall be subject to a 185-foot building setback from the Tangerine Road property line. B. Amendment Justification. The TRCOD ordinance specifically mandates flexibility and permits modification of the TRCOD for a master -planned development such as Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 3 where the modifications meets or exceeds the intent of the ordinance. See OVZCR Section 24. LEA.b. This proposed amendment meets the intent of the TRCOD and the Rancho Vistoso PAD to maintain the sensitive natural character of the Tangerine Road frontage balanced with the OVZCR-acknowledged desire for economic development on specified, master -planned and strategically located sites, specifically the campus park industrial development designated for Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 3 in the Rancho Vistoso PAD and in the Town's General Plan. See OVZCR Section 24.1.E.2. The proposed amendment modifies a very generalized setback provision to provide the site -specific setback from the future Tangerine Road right-of-way, specifically tailored to the applicant's new hotel development. This site -specific setback will result in the new hotel building being set back over 311 feet from the existing constructed Tangerine Road right-of-way. The proposed amendment also takes into account the fact that the future Tangerine Road right-of-way in this location is substantially larger (over 99 feet greater) that the future right-of-way in most other locations along Tangerine Road. The extensive future right-of-way here, is designed to accommodate a future grade -separated interchange at Tangerine Road and Oracle Road. However, based on the Regional Transportation Authority and available Arizona Department of Transportation plans, future development of the right-of-way in this area is not planned for over 20 years. Accordingly, the proposed amendment will meet the intent of TRCOD to maintain the Tangerine Road frontage while allowing for the economic development that this development will bring to Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 3 and the surrounding community. Specifically, Tangerine Road will be maintained because the hotel site will not have direct access to Tangerine Road, instead using the existing access at Innovation Road. The hotel design will incorporate an internal loop circulation system and will integrate its circulation system with the Neighborhood 3 internal circulation system. The hotel landscape design will comply with all Town vegetative and buffering requirements internally and including a 25-foot landscape buffer along the Tangerine Road frontage. Further, the new hotel site is designed to be located below a ridgeline to the north and east. The combination of these design considerations will serve to enhance the visual impact of the hotel along Tangerine Road and to preserve view corridors to the Santa Catalina Mountains from Catalina Shadows Subdivision south west of the hotel site. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL Notice is provided that the Oro Valley Town Council will conduct a public hearing at or after: 7:00 pm, Wednesday, October 17, 2007 Oro Valley Town Hall,11,000 N. La Caftada Drive Oro Valley, Arizona Public Hearing: OV9-07-02A, NCH Corporation/Transwest Properties, being represented by The Planning Center, proposes to amend the Permitted Uses and Development Standards for the Campus Park Industrial (CPI) Land Use District within the Rancho Vistoso PAD to add Hotel to the permitted uses, and allow for a maximum height for a proposed hotel up to 75 feet. The applicant is requesting the code amendments to allow for the construction of a hotel to be located in the southern portion of Rancho Vistoso:Neighborhood 3, east of Innovation Park Drive on the north side of Tangerine Road. The parcel number is 223-02-021 D. A complete description and draft of the proposed code amendments are available at the Town Hall, Planning and Zoning Department. Members of the public are invited to attend this meeting and will be given an opportunity to speak. For additional information, please contact Matt Michels, OV Senior Planner at 520.229.4822 or mmichels@,orovallev.net TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 11000 N La Canada Dr Oro Valley, AZ 85737 219205090 MORRIS JOSEPH E 310 S 100 WEST LA VERKIN UT 84745-5700 4��PtES POST'9G' F zUS d ,® a "IN[Y novas 02 1 A $ 00.260 0004337343 SEP27 2007 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 85737 OOT 0 9 200I RETURN 70 NOIT DELIVERADLE ASNDER FADDRESSED t ►NAMLE 70 F'bRwARo EtC, 9-5737701.599 *2699- 02104-04•-40 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 11000 N La Canada Dr ses ��N Oro Valley, AZ 85737 F ��A PI7NF.Y BOYVES ` 02 1A $ 00.260 0004337343 SEP27 2007 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 8 5 7 3 7 219241380 BROWN MILTON R JR & JEAN A CP/RS 13476 N WIDE VIEW DR TUCSON AZ 85737-0000 X SSO NFE i S0 6C dQ 091 30J a7 FORWARD TIME: EXP RTN TO SEND DROWN 20362 DONEGAL LN RETURN TO SENDER )b l I d d J I IJ I d) J I I d) I I I )II)I I.I!!))J JJI) ))I)►I lI)} TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 11000 N La Canada SAP Oro Valley, AZ 85737 Z '] PRINEY BOWE5 . 02 1 A $ 00.260 0004337343 SER27 2007 MAILED FROM ZIPCODE 85737 219206590 ESPINOZA JENNIFER M 2334 E MORTAR PESTLE DR TUCSON AZ 85737-0000 X SSG Nrs 'i S06C Cad o9f 3C51 O7 FORWARD TIME EXP RTN TO SEND ESPINO.ZA 2311 W CORRINE OR P�40SNXX-.:cam. VSOS9-SS2S RETURN TO SENDER )II I III/I) JII r l Ir )I)I II))II )) 1 I I I I I))JI tI)I)I J r l I J J I I) 'Town of Oro Valley 11000 N La Canada Oro Valley, AZ 85737 e'q�*s PO Ptrm" BOWES 02 1 A $ 00.260 0004337343 SEP27 2007 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 85737 219207850 FRY PATRICIA L 13368 N WIDE VIEW DR ORO VALLEY AZ 85755-1933 X SSO NFE i 90+6C 00 091 S0107 FORWARD TIME E:XP RTN TO SEND FRV'PATRICIA 11001 N 7TN ST APT21164 RETURN TO SENDER ))iJll+lllIII 11111I1111M 11 I)Ills it It 001) J I)II)JIJ1111) TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 11000 N La Canada Dr Oro valley, AZ 85737 sesPN 0 z ® I4ItaY HICww5 02 , A $ 00.260 0004337343 SEP27 2007 MAILED FROM ZIP GODE 85737 219207980 GREELEY KRISTIN SUE 13458 N BIG VIEW COURT TUCSON AZ 85747-0000 x sso NFE i Gosc 00 OQ130107 FORWARD TIME EXP RTN TO SEND GREET-EY' KRISTIN PO BOAC 193103 ,Srv,s...-jLeAN: PcR...0.,,.e RETURN TO SENDER I) I I) I I) I) I) I I I) I I ) ) i)III))III))) I I I I i I ) ) I) I) I) I) I I) I) I I) I) I I) TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 11000 N La. Canada Dr Oro Valley, AZ 85737 219241280 HURTADO DAWN 2504 E PETROGLYPH LN ORO VALLEY AZ 85737-0000 141XmE $50 DE 1 tses Pp� Q A. z` B 'WMW� wTNFY E30WE5 02 , A $ 00. 260 0004337343 SEP27 2007 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 85 73 7 0 00 10i 04,107 RETURN TO SENDER NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO FORWARD SC: 95737701599 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 11000 N La Canada Dr Oro Valley, AZ 85737 LQOZ E - 130 `4i O��P�TQQ 0kcl Ate® Immmmmm Pirwuy 6ovws 02 1 A $ 00. 260 � ti 0004337343 SEP27 2007 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 85 73 7 219242000 BRONSON DAVID D 13719 N HIGH MOUNTAIN VIEW PL ORO VALLEY AZ 85737-0000 NIXIE_ E+SO ire_ 1 OO 09/20/07 RETURN TO SENDER VACANT UNASL E TO PC,RIJARD 8C: 05737701599 *1079-0.2427-2,.9-21 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 11000 N La Canada Dr Oro Valley, AZ 85737 OCT - 3 200I o�tses Pos;t PiTNEV aowrs 02 1 A. $ 00.260 0004337343 SEP27 2007 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 8 5 7 3 7 219242140 LEWIS THOMAS P & REBECCA K CP/RS 13880 N BIG WASH OVERLOOK PL ORO VALLEY AZ 85739-8852 NTXZE 950 OE :1 00 09/29/07 RETURN 'TO SENDER VACANT UNADLIZ TO FORWARD MC: 05707701599 '*1079-024.29-29—.21 III] 1l1l1l,l1„IIIIII11,J11)1I111„„fI1r11111111111111111111 Town of Oro Vallee 110001N La Canada �p PoST,y Oro Valley, AZ. 85737 vy Q % � - wrr,�Er uov�s 02 1 A $ 00.260 0004337343 SEP27 2007 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 85737 219240160 WAKEFIELD JOHN & JOANNE CRIRS 13301 N LOST ARTIFACT LN TUCSON AZ 85737-1954 N I xmF— 950 DE 1 00 10/ 04/ 0'7 RETURN TO SENDER NOT DEL.IVERADLE AS ADDRESSED UNADLE TO FORWARD E3O: 9570770 1-S99 `j *:1)779 — 0+49SO--. 9--25 11//1/11,1)111111111111i10 111i,11111) 1)1,11)1 111!)),111) TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 11000 N La Canada Dr Oro Valley, AZ 85737 OCT — 3 200r 9�A� PCs, _ P"I:v eovvfs 02 , A $ 00.260 0004337343 SEP27 2007 MAILED FROM ZIPCODE 85737 219242100 MA VINH 13774 N HIGH MOUNTAIN VIEW PL TUCSON AZ 85739-8844 NXXZC 950 DE i 00 09f29/07 RETURN TO SENDER VACANT UNABLE TO FORWARD SCa 057Z7701599 *1879-024.29-29-21 III II„II Idif JIII1,I,,,II,I►IIIIII)IIIIII) )III ItIititIII it11 Town of Oro Valley 11000 N La Canada g�vos Pp�� Oro Valley, AL 85737 O PITNEY BOWES OCTz 'IA 00.26° CT 0 3 2007 0004337343 SEP27 2007 0 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 85737 219206180 TRIANGLE BAR SURVIVORS TRUST ATTN: MARILYN B ALBERS TR 1604 E CROWN RIDGE WAY ORO VALLEY AZ 85755-7101 NIXIE 6.50 CE 1 40 09/29/0-1 RETURN TO SENDER NOT DELIVERADL.E AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO i'ORWARD SC: 05737701599 *1079— 0.2021--.29—.21 III Ii„i,1,1,1,1„I1111,,11„,111,M��If,l,l,l,l,�l�i„IIIIII TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 11000 N Ls Canada. Dr Oro Valley, AZ 85737 OCT 0 3 2007 g�*� pN ® F"uv eowES 02 1 A $ 00.260 0004337343 SEP27 2007 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 85737 219240820 MC CARTHY JAMES W & VIVIAN A CP/RS 7676 E DAYVEI W CIR TUCSON AZ syP'�€� 85750-0000 �, FOR FF eD ON r�UPES p pP INSU .�oTFD, N�J� KNOW" p SUCH a NoCANT TA ANT' pVA UTF TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 11000 N La Canada Dr �PsEs PpsT Oro Valley, AZ 85737 - z q7 NEY 60YJE5 02 1 A $ 00. 260 OH4337343 SEP 27 2007 MAILED FROMZZIPCODE 85 73 7 uVi 0 S 2uuui 219241510 MYLES WINNFORT J & DEBORAH F JT/RS 13577 N WIDE VIEW DR TUCSON AZ 85747-0000 NIXIE ass CL' i 40 ]O/D4J07 RETURN TO :SENDER NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO FORWARD me : 957.07701599 * 1779- 0 49+42-29- 26 11111„1,1111111>>11111/111)>,111)]111)11)111)1)1„11)1)1,1„1 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 11000 N La Canada Oro Valley, AZ 85737 O�P� PN � �o rrrrocr ea�x_s 2 , $ 00.260 0004337343 SEP27 2007 MAILED FR804;IPCODE�85 737 007 219204400 HOSKIN MARY 99% & DENDY TIMOTHY 10io 13224 N CLASSIC OVERLOOK CT ORO VALLEY AZ 85755-1904 MI:{TL" $so i?i= � OSJ 3LJ:?4JQ7 RETURN TO SENDER NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO FORWARD sc: 057'217701ISS9 *3'779-04999-29-.2S III I),Ifl,))II IjmIf)1,,,1,)),)?),),)„),h,))1))1 'Town of Oro Valley 11000 N La Canada ages POsT Oro Valley, AZ 85737 ,x O 1-vl Z 1'IiNEY BWIfES 02 1 A $ 00. 260 0004337343 SEP27 2007 MAILED FROMZIPCODE 85737 OCT 0 9 2nn7 219240950 HELINSKI DENNIS F & SHARON CP/RS 13361 VISTOSO BLUFF PL ORO VALLEY AZ ac'717_nnnn NTxIE 8�0 DE A. 06 :10i DAJ 07 RETURN TO SENDER NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO FORWARD DC: 057377[?IS99 *:1779--04990-29-28 ill 1111111/1lllilIl1,illlii,Iliilillllliili, I,lllllillllllllll Tcwn of Oro Valley 11000 N La Canada Oro Valley, AZ 85737 ® PITN[Y 6ovots 02 1A $ 00.260 0004337343 SEP 27 2007 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 85737 OCT a ® 4UU? 219240230 OWEN-SLATER PATRICIA J & BATINICA MICHAEI MEIGHAN A ALL JT/RS 2335 E PRECIOUS SHARD CT TT T('R()N AZ NIXIE f3S0 DC 1 00 10/ DA/ 0'7 RETURN TO .SENDER NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO FORWARD BC: €S70770AS99 *1779--04900-29—.26 1)111111J)11111,1111)11J)171)1)1111;111)1111)I)1111)11)11111 fomn of Oro Valley 1 1000 N La Canada P seS PpgT Oro Valley. A7. 85737 ,� y��Q O =1vliv�..�.� w� wnyry eomrss 02 , A $ 00.260 0004337343 SEP27 2007 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 85737 219240960 GOMEZ PETER STANLEY & JESSICA CP/RS 13353 N VISTOSO BLUFF PL ORO VALLEY AZ 85755-1956 NIXIE OSO DE :1 00 09,/00,/07 RETURN TO SENDER NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED UNASI—E TO FORWARD DG. E�S'73'7'70t.�99 *1679-03799-30-4.2 Town or Oro Valley 11000 N La Canada 9�P�Poe?,P Oro Valley, AZ 85737 91 '�i�/ - PfCNCY BOYVCS 02 1 A $ 00.261D 0004337343 SEP27 2007 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 85737 W4,1 0 j 26,37 219205080 KEMP CHARLES J & RENICK JAMI L JT/RS 2150 E BEDROCK LN TUCSON AZ 85737-0000 N IXIE 950 DE 1 00 IW O4l07 RETURN TO SENDER NOT DELZVERADLE AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO FORWARD 6C: D.57g7701599 *1779-04979--29-9E )) I I) I I) I) I) I I I) I I ) ) I)III))I/I))) I I I I I I ) ) I) I) i) I) I I) I) I I) I) I II Town of Oro Valley 11000 N La Canada Oro Valley, AZ 85737 g't" z ®'igy sr�v® ® WrIJEY sovws 02 1A $ 00.260 0004337343 SEP27 2007 MAILED FROM ZIPCODE 85737 OCT 0 QU7 219240220 CHESLEIGH JEFFERY M & REGINA L CP/RS 2327 E PRECIOUS SHARD CT ORO VALLEY AZ 85737-0000 N'ZXIE 850 ICE 1 00 -IW 04/ 07 RETURN TO SENDER NOT DELIVERADLE AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO FORWARD SC: 9S7S7701S99 *1779--04970--i29—.26 Town of Oro Valley S��TesP�Qe 11000 N La Canada Drive Oro Valley, AZ 85737 10E,<i Z Wig- B�s� 02 1.A $ 00.260 0004337343 JUN 26 2007 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 85737 JUL 0 9 2007 219205090 MORRIS JOSEPH E z i n ¢ inn WEST N:I:K:iE 941 DE 1 00 07./04JO7 RETURN To s NDE R NOT DEL.IVERABL.E AS ADDRE_SsED UNADLE TO FORWARD DC. 957,3- 7— 01-x599 'r d737 �- OCa.?•�Lti ?E - �f9 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORETHE ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Notice is provided that the Oro Valley Planning and Zoning Commission will conduct a public hearing at or after: 6:00 pm, Thursday, July 12, 2007 Oro Valley Town Hall,11,000 N. La Catiada Drive Oro Valley, Arizona Public Hearing: OV9-07-02A, The Planning Center, representing NCH Corporation/Transwest Properties, proposes text amendments to Policy 9 for Neighborhood 3 of the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development (PAD) and to Section 24.1.13. l.b.i of the Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District in the OVZCR to allow for a reduced building setback for a proposed hotel; to amend the Permitted Uses and Development Standards for the Campus Park Industrial (CPI) Land Use District within the Rancho Vistoso PAD; and to add Hotel to the permitted uses and allow for a maximum height for a proposed hotel up to 75 feet. The applicant is requesting the code amendments to allow for the construction of a hotel on their parcel, located in the southern portion of Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 3, east of Innovation Park Drive on the north side of Tangerine Road. The parcel number is 223-02-021 D. A complete description and draft of the proposed code amendments are available at the Town Hall, Planning and Zoning Departnuatt. This notice and a map of the proposed amendments are available at http://%%-w.townoforovalley.com/PZJIicarings PZ.htm. Members of the public are invited to attend this meeting and will be given an opportunity to speak. For additional information, please contact Matt Michels, OV Senior Planner at 520.229.4822 or mm ichelsoa�,oroval ley.net �(IVIIfIIfIII`I`I`I`1I"""III",IItIfIIII(( <(TVIIIIIfII sc-ate-o� t�oa-�� ode 66STO42-o`go :me Cldt7r dQJ 01 M laVNn C)MSSnU0QV SV M"lG<iJWMAZIMO ION &MQN35 oL N4:fn t.MN 1.o-rcoJ 40 00 T oQ ose 3TXITN 0000-LbL58 ze xosDfi.L 2IQ M21IA 9QIM ICI LLSEI S2U,Lf 3 HV-d099Q V f L do-4Nf1I A Sg IAW O19M6IZ L £ L 98 3000 dIZ WONJ O311VW LOOZ 9ZN;'i £ti£L££7000 o9z•oo t v_L zG 57M09 AlHtld (r -ate.'- O ;tsod S 17 �: CfZ• L£LS8 ZV `-(6118A OJO ,s8118A OJO JO UtAO L Town of Oro Valley 11000 N La Canada Drive Oro Valley, AZ 85737 -L w SAP PN ® ATMFY 605M1F5 02 1A $ 00.260 0004337343 JUN26 2007 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 85737 JUL 0 9 2007 219240010 RT.('T-T() RTPPTTPN AA R, CT TQ AAT T (DfV c RETURN TO SENDER NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO FORWARD DC: 05737701599 *0379-00477-26-36 1111111111111111111111114111111111111111111)111111)1)11)1)111 Town of Oro Valley 11000 N La Canada Drive Oro Valley, AZ 85737 JUL 0 5 2'007 219206390 P zlug - PITNEV BOWES 0 2 1 A $ 00. 260 0004337343 JUN26 2007 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 85737 X DSO NFA i 206C'. 00 06 /29/07 FORWARD TIME E:: P RTN TO SEND OTTOMON I 13272 N MORTAR PESTLE CT ORO VALLEY AZ E5755-1902 RETURN TO SENDER 1!„l,,I,l,l,,,l„11,),,,►1,„11),,,,,,11,J,1,1,1„1,1„l,)„1 Town of Oro Valley 11000 N La Canada Drive Oro Valley, AZ 85737 J U L 0 6 2007 Q:*s P711YE4 BONES 02 1 A $ 00. 260 0004337343 JUN 26 2007 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 85737 219240160 WAKEFIELD JOHN & JOANNE MRS NZX'I-c -050 DC 1 00 07/03/07 RETURN 'TO sE:NDE:R NOT DEL:L4:RA0I-,E AS ADD;�ESSED UNADLE_ TO PORWARD AC:: 65737701599 *Oa79-.2.2751--25-37 III) I111J)lull„II)h?I11MIIIII MIIIIIIIIIilli,l,I)II„i Town of Oro Valley 11000 N La Canada Drive Oro Valley, AZ 85737 ('�TNhhEY��1SfYWF:S 02 1 A $ 00.260 0004337343 JUN26 2007 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 85737 219242340 PISTERZI ALBERT J 13957 N BIG WASH OVERLOOK PL TUCSON AZ 85737-8842 PI51"957 8573730—)3 IN 18 07/0E/07 UNABLE TO FORWARD NO FORWARD ORDER ON FILE RETURN TO POSTMASTER OF ADDRESSEE FOR REVIEW Town of Oro Valley 11000 N La Canada Drive Oro Valley, AZ 85737 JUL 0 9 2001 219241280 HURTADO DAWN 2504 E PETROGLYPH LN ORO VALLEY AZ F ' Pt7Ni Y60Wf5 02 1 A $ 00.260 0004337343 JUN26 2007 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 85737 N:T CIE O—SO [3[z. 1 00 07/04/07 RETURN TO SENDER NOT OCL.IVERAML.E AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO FORWARD SC: €9573770IS99 *0279-171.12-26-37 ��ri�:r�r�r�rrrirr����rrr��rrr��jrrrrrr�ir�r�r�rirr�r�rr�r�rr� Town of Oro Valley 11000 N I.a Canada 74� Oro Valley,.%Z 85737 4' odd T 2 b�=mmw Pumv BOWES 02 1 A $ 00.260 00043373�j�.�SEP27 2007 MAILED FRQi4�.QJP@7QE20077 219206330 FATTA HENRY 13249 N MORTAR PESTLE CT ORO VALLEY AZ 85755-1902 NTXTE aso DE 1 00 10./04/07 RETURN TO salloE;R NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO FORWARD DC: €57E)7'701599 *17*79-0+4977-29-6E )i„If l,l,),,,)„)l,l,,,}1,„))),,,,,,)},f,),),}„),l„1,}„1 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 11000 N La Canada Dr Oro Valley, AZ 85737 219207840 WAGNER MARCIE E 13360 N WIDE VIEW DR ORO VALLEY AZ 85755-1933 NiXIC Brio DE :L -:0SES PON PTTWV BOVIIFS 02 1 A $ 00.260 0004337343 SEP27 2007 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 85737 n^,. %J` ` 9 ?0,77 OO Z01 04l 0 7 RETURN TO SUNDER NOT DEL-1VERABI_E AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO FORWARD sc: 9S707701599 1979-00 400--00-02 )))))11))il)))!))Indllli)))lm?IIIIMILL)?I?])!)))17)))I C3dWMi6-{C?-J O-L 3"10klNn 03 SSMNC]OV Ski 31€ VaAMA27Ma ION a:3MaNas 01. Nun-Lma L-o/C0440 0 T MCI C]Se L £ L S 8 3000 diZ W08A 0311VV4 zooz gzrjni £ti£L££b000 o9Z' 00 $ a � z o S3M(T9 F 1ldlkf s zs-Od sva 3'd1JUVIN Zi-gmtJv/xl Ob8LOZ61Z L027 o In[ L£LSS ZV `,CapgA OJO aAUG gpgugJ g'1 N 00011 ,4119A oaO3o UMOJL Town of Oro Valley 11000 N La Canada Drive Oro Valley, AZ 85737 .Il L 0 6 2007 C , VI NTNIY 60WE5 02 1 A $ 00-260 0004337343 JUN26 2007 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 85737 219206500 SCALA THERESA KATHLEEN 13239 N HAMMERSTONE LN ORO VALLEY AZ -NIXIE 950 DE 1 00 07/03)07 F2ETURN TO SENDER NOT DE L IVERADLE AS AE9DRESSMO UNADL.E TO FORWAIQD 0C: E357077015SR9 *0079-001 GS52- 26--00 I IOOO NISF C VALLEY Oro Vave,, a ada Dr 85737 219208010 SMITH MICHAEL T 13455 N BIG VIEW CT TUCSON AZ 85737-0000 'N1X'S,E 650 CE Al O �os p%- �� RTNfY fSOVVES 02 1 A. $ 00.2611 0004337343 SEP27 2007 MAILED FROM ZIPCODE 85 7 3 7 n o% 40 10104.l07 RETURN TO SENDER NOT DE"LT VERADLE AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO FORWARD SC: 957a7'70AS99 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 11000 N La Canada Dr Oro Valley, AZ 85737 22302016B HDP NORTHWE/,", C +� 0(li TTLI GnnQTP inn s®® "IN EY BOYVES 02 1A $ 00.260 0004337343 SEP27 2007 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 85 737 oCr � 'I 1007 NxxIC, 041 3E i O1 10/04/07 RETURN 70 SENDER NOT DELIVERAMLE AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO FORWARD DCt OB797701•SS9 *.2699-04007-04-06 )1T,1„1>l,1„T1,T11,1,))11TTT111„TTTTl1Tl,1,),1>>1)1T)))1),1 Town of Oro Valley Po 11000 N La Canada Drive M. ����� IQ;p Oro Valley,. AZ 85737 f �® Z crrHcr sovvr s 02 1 A $ 00.260 JUL 0 6 2'007 0004337343 JUN26 2007 MAIIEDFROM ZIPCODE 85737 219241150 SMITH TIMOTHY E & LINDA M CP/RS 2508 E BIG VIEW DR ORO VALLEY AZ 9 9737-0000 Ni7CTF_ e50 -DE 1 0-0 -07,PC73y►0'7 RETURN TO :SENDER NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED UNAGLE `7'O FORWARD DC: 05707701.S99 *0.379--00£34--26--30 Town of Oro Valley 11000 N La Canada Drive Oro Valley, AZ 85737 JUL 0 9 'J7 �� v P%�F z' c PITNFV 60YVE5 02 1 A $ 00. 260 0004337343 JUN26 2007 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 35 73 7 219240230 OWEN-SLATER PATRICIA J & BATINICA MICHAEL MEIGHAN A ALL JT/RS 2335 E PRECIOUS SHARD CT NIXIE 950 DE 1 00 07.,V03/o7 RETURN TO SENDER NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO FORWARD DC: 05737701599 '�0379-00030-26-3e 11„1„Idd.„1,,11►1,„11„,111„„„11,1,1,1,1„1,1„1,1„1 Town of Oro Valley 11000 N La Canada Drive ��P ��9 Oro Valley, AZ 85737,i �= � mmlry eowus JUL 0 2 2e 02 1 A $ 00.260 0004337343 JUN26 2007 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 85 73 7 219240820 MC CARTHY JAMES W & VIVIAN A C"S, avp�gEC? 7676EDAYVEIWAR,,,1,IaF�DIN C. ,',. ,G AFT TUCSONAZ 11 / _,��, r _ ,i.�R� � .—I RETURN TO SENDER NOT Dt I-XVERAGI_E AS ADDRESSED UNADLE TO F ORwARD E70. a 05707701599 *0.279-007f39-26--Zss �:.L�.;:;-:{IIII,II,IIIII,I.,{I,I.,,1{,I�III,I,,,.I{,l►l,f,ll,l,l„I,I„I TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 11000 N La Canada Dr tP9s PC% Oro Valley, AZ 85737 c, � zQ4 ArnFv BovuEs 02 , A $ 00. 260 0004337343 SEP27 2007 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 85737 219241530 SUTTON ROBERT EDWIN JR & REBECCA LYNN JT/RS 2628 E BIG VIEW DR TUCSON AZ 85737-0000 X 8s0 N7E i SOSC 40 Ogi 30./ 0'7 FORWARD TIME ESOP RTN TO SEND SUTTON JR 13OS WILDCAT DR POP.T#kAN:D .T{ .-s.p►.� yca- tea RETURN TO SENDER ��rr�rrtt�rjtrt�trl�rit.tt��rrrr��arrrrtlltlt�r�rlrr�rlrr�rJrr� Town of Oro Valley 11000 N La Canada Drive y�P �4q4, Oro Valley, AZ 85737JUL 0 2 egg 02 1 A $ 00, 26° ' 0004337343 JUN26 2007 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 85737 219242100 MA VINH 13774 N HIGH MOUNTAIN VIEW PL TUCSON AZ N:tX2E: O1.50 )DE 1 00 06/29./07 RETURN 'TO cF_'NDFR NOT DE L.IVEsRAMI M As ADDRESSED UNAOL.E:: TO rOF:11dARD E3C: £3S'7.3'�7Cf:1-�t3:�=k007t3--:1:LET�S—�E�--�f5 Town of Oro Valley 11000 N La Canada Drive o41.0 Oro Valley, AZ 85737 `gg �p ^007 ` %1_ €1 7 wrruv sovws ti 02 1 A $ 00. 260 0004337343 JUr126 2007 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 85737 219207680 BINGEL WALTER T & SUSAN C MRS 2358 E BIG VIEW DR ORO VALLEY AZ 85737-0000 N:1X1E 050 I]E 1 00 06/ 29/07 RETURNI TO SENDER NOT DEL.:I VERAGtLE AS ADDRESSED UNAMLE TO FORWARD DC: 95737701599 *0079-2.265S-26 -37 Il��1),hl,1MI)MIlm11m111,)1)?111111I)IJ)d)11)111111 Town of Oro Valley 11000 N La Canada Drive Oro Valley, AZ 85737 �Ses pos�' myray amms 02 1A $00-260 0004337343 JUN26 2007 VA2LERF TM ZIPGODE 85737 PIERCE FRAKA & MRS" 2145 E TABULAR PL, TUCSON Az 85737-0000 UTF Town of Oro Valley 11000 N La Canada Drive M POro Valley, AZ 85737P"EV 8O jUL 0 2 eoa7 02, 00.26° 0004337343 JUfJ26 2007 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 85737 219242420 LE LAN 13879 N BIG WASH OVERLOOK PL TUCSON AZ 85739-8851 NIXIE 0.50 DE 1 00 O6J28JO7 RETURN TO SENDER NOT DELI'VERADLE"- AS ADDRESSED UNADLE TO FORWARD DC: 05737701.599 *0079-229OS - 25- 07 Town of Oro Valley 11000 N La Canada Drive Oro Valley, AZ 85737 N I Y. I G e is o c r-_' 1 i, 02 1 A $ 00.260 0004337343 JUN25 2007 MAILED FROM ZIP GODE 8 5 7 3 7 40 Del 9./ 07 RETURN TO SCNDCR NOT DEL:EVCRAM1..E AS ADDRM sED UNAML_C TO FOPW -iRD sc: 95737701599 *0279-00910- 26-136 Town of Oro Valley 11000 N La Canada Drive Oro Valley, AZ 85737 J U L 0 2 2007 .§OS K�&T'� 7 ® mNIEV BOWES 02 , A $ 00.260 0004337343 JUN 26 2007 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 85737 219241090 SIMONTON YALE M & JAMI S JT/RS 13539 N WIDE VIEW DR ORO VALLEY AZ NIxIE £3-50 DE: ,1 00 06/28/07 RETURN TO SENDER NOT DE:LIVEF?ADLE AS ADDRESSED UNADLE: TO FORWARD E]O: 05737701-599 *0379--OO$s3--26-09 1111111111111111„11)111,11,,,111,,,1„11,J11,1,1111)1„),1,11 Town of Oro Valley 11000 N La Canada Drive Oro Valley, AZ 85737 JUL 0 2 2007 z ' PITNl.V 60V17E5 02 1 A $ 00. 260 0004337343 JUN26 2007 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 85737 219240950 HELINSKI DENNIS F & SHARON CP/RS 13361 VISTOSO BLUFF PL nun VAT TRY A7 NIXIE: £DSO DA 1 00 06/20/07 RETURN TO SENDER NOT DELIVERFaDLE AS ADDREES:SED UNAMLE TO f'DRWARD DC: OS737701S99 *0279-000'70-26-08 11„1„ 111, I,,11„ Il,1,,, l l„, III,„,,,11,1,1, (lllllllllllllllllIII I iililu llllllllIIlIIIlItIIIIItIIlll1Il 6�-LO-6SLC0-6OS1� 66'ST0446LES :OS Call alozi OI a-lawNn NMONX ION - Q3IdW3IIti Wnr°rw-4-M n i mmn f "m L01401LO TO WL zc dmfioazl a911vw LOOZ 9ZNn b£L££b000 o9Z'00 $ y ° 53fV{O9 A3N1F.f G 5 Z# alnod 30 Tte 31XIN O gLUCULG. �8t Nn C18VM803 Ol 3 - 1`�N ©3ss3avc=v 5v -1 113vu.;,, a-3sn:338 SS3,,GV 1N3101:3nSM NIV,JN'A 1QN d-�sWnN HJnS 014 0 I�i (3NO 0i O Nenl3= L€LS8 ZV `,COUVA 0-10 aAUQ 8PVU9J Wj N 011UIT S0118A oaO JO UA&OJL Town of Oro Valley 11000 N La Canada Drive Oro Valley, AZ 85737 JUL U 2 2d0? Q�PSES Pos')t ' fi "4V 1'17 N,Y $lX'JES 2 ,A $ 00.26" 0004337343 JUN26 2007 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 85 73 7 219206480 IANNOTTI JOSEPH & DEBRA CP/RS 13218 N MORTAR PESTLE CT N:LX:YE 6s0 D1 1 00 O5./.2e./07 RE'TUMN TO SENDER NOT OIWI_:1 VERAE3l_E AS ADDRESSED UNAE3L.E TO F=ORWARID FAG: 0573770. S99 *14:14-:16415--26--.Og 11„1„I,1d):,I),1I,1M11„,IU,,,,,,I1,1,1,1,1 III) I,II,I„I Town of Oro Valley 11000 N La Canada Drive Oro Valley, AZ 85737 JUL ® 2 yap? o �AsEs poST4� z PRNEY ROWE5 02 , A $ 00. 26° /3004337343 JUN26 2007 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 85737 219205080 KEMP CHARLES J & RENICK JAMI L JT/RS 2150 E BEDROCK LN TUCSON AZ 85737-0000 Rl:1X2E 850 DE 1 00 06129107 RETURN TO SENDER NOT DEI-XVIERADLE AS ADDRESSED UNADL.E TO FORWARD MC: 05737701$99 *0279-00939--26-36 Town of Oro Valley 11000 N La Canada Drive Oro Valley, AZ 85737 F ',4�1 ® PITNTY KO'/VES 02 1 A $ 00.260 0004337343 JUN26 2007 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 8 5 7 3 7 219241760 COHEN RANDALL SCOTT & CATHRYN PHILLIPS C 2527 E BIG VIEW DR ORO VALLEY AZ 85737-0000 WEx:CL 950 DE 1 QC, t7�/ �aJc)7 RETURN TO SENDER ➢N©'r DELIVERAMLE: AS ADDRESSED UNAMLE TO FoRwARD MC: E3-ar^70770IS99 %'0079-005.59--26--39 1 l„ 1„l, l,1,,, l„1 1,1,,, l 1,,, 1 1 1,,,,,, l 1, 1, 1, 1, l„l, l„1,1„1 Town of Oro Valley 11000 N La Canada Drive 5'"P�PQ% Oro Valley, AZ 85737 'a1 J U L 0 2 2 7 ® FHNEY HOWES 02 1 A $ 00.26o 0004337343 JUN26 2007 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 85737 219241380 BROWN MILTON R JR & JEAN A CP/RS 13476 N WIDE VIEW DR TUCSON AZ 85737-0000 x 950 NF'E. 1 osc 00 06/ 28/07 FORWARD TIME EXP MTN 70 SEND BROWN 20382 DONEiGAU IN :S'iRONG;SV;IL.L.E OH 44149-0960 RETURN 70 SCNOCR Town of Oro Valley 11000 N La Canada Drive Oro Valley, AZ 85737 J U L o 2 2007 219207980 GREELEY KRISTIN SUE 13458 N BIG VIEW COURT - ,rif QnV A7, fi 7 r �rn�[ r noting s 02 1 A $ 00.260 0004337343 JUN26 2007 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 35737 0 FORWARD TTMEEXP RTN©TTO SEND �/2E3/{]'7 GREE.L-EY 1{R:CtiSTIN PO sox 19310a SAN JUAN PR 00919-3100 RETURN TO SCNOCR ikdl)i;l,i,,,l,;i) 1))di,,,III„,,,,ii,'i,i�i,l„l,i„l,i„1 JUNE 28, 2007 The Daily Territorial PAGE 20 suant to the Deed of Trust which had an dota Heights, MN 55120 Current Trus- original balance of $165,000.00 exe- the East door of the new Courts Build- Recorder of Pima County, Arizona, re - original balance of $92,200.00 executed tee Michael A Bosco, Jr. 2525 East cuted by Thomas Sales, a married man ing, 110 West Congress, Tucson, AZ. , corded in Book 57of Maps, page 76. s by Teresa Tomaski, a married woman Camelback Road #300 Phoenix, Ari- as his sole and separate property, and to the highest bidder for'cash (in the The street addresslocation of the real as her sole and separate property, 5980 zone 85016 (602) 255-6000 Dated: Alicia Sales an unmarried woman as forms which are lawful tender in .the property described above is purported _ r S. Sandario Rd. Tucson, AZ 85735 06/12/2007/S/Michael A. Bosco, Jr., At- joint tenants, 1255 S. Camino Del Si- United States and acceptable to the to be: 11046 W. Jule Way Marana, AZ dated August 1, 2001 and recorded tomey at Law,Trustee/Successor Trus- errs Tucson, AZ 85713 , dated July 28, Trustee, payable in accordance . with 85653 Tax Parcel No.: 217-53-24408 ri mation obtained will be used for that August 6, 2001, as - Instrument tee under said Deed of Trust, and is 2006 and recorded July 31, 2006, as In- ARS 33-811A), all right, title, and inter- The undersigned'Tmstee disclaims any purpose. P300713 No./Docket-Page 11606-2605,of Official qualified to ad as Successor Trustee strument . No,/Docket-Page est conveyed to and now held by it un- liability for any hcorrectness of the PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial Records in the office of the County Re- per ARS Section 33-803 (A)2, as a 12857-11511 of Official Records in the der said Deed of Trust, in the property street address and other common des- , Jun. 28; Jul. 5,12,19, 2007 corder of Pima County, State of Ari- member of the Arizona State Bar. office of the County Recorder of Pima situated in said County and State and ignation, if any, shown herein. The trdelgado/300713 j.m zone, will sell the real property de- STATE OF ARIZONA,County of Mart- County, State of Arizona, will sell the more fully described as: Unit 32 of beneficiary under Iha aforementioned NOTICE OF TRUSTEE'S SALE scribed herein by public auction on Sep- cops This instrument was acknowl- real property described herein by public TIERRA CATALINA CONDOMINIUM, a Deed of Trust has accelerated the Note File ID. #07-03311 Zatar ai is ain Notice is tember 12, 2007 at 11:30 AM, outside edged before me on 06112/2007, by MI- auction on September 12, 2007 at condominium as created by that certain secured thereby and has declared the hereby given that Michael Bosco, J the East door of the new Courts Build- CHAEL A. BOSCO. JR., Attorney at 11:30 AM, outside the East door of the Declaration recorded February 22, 2005 entire unpaid pdridpat balance, as well Attorney at Law, as trustee (or succes- mg, 110 West Congress, Tucson, AZ. , Law, as, Trustee/Successor Trustee. new Courts Building, 110 West Con- as Docket 12494 page 731, and shown as any and all'oter amounts due e sor trustee, or substituted trustee), pus- to the highest bidder for cash (in the /S/Jennifer Hamlin, Notary Public Com- gress, Tucson, AZ. , to the highest bid- on the Plat of said Condominium re- connection with said Note and/or Deed which suant to the Deeds Trust which had an forms which are lawful tender in the mission expiration is 1/1912010 der for cash (in the forms which are law- , corded February 22, 2005 as Book 59 of Trust, immediately due and payable. original balance of $ust exe- f $152,tarain, United States and acceptable to the 12:00:00 AM NOTICE: This proceeding ful tender in the United States and so- of Maps, page 36,'in the office of the Said sale will be made in an 'as is' cop origin, by Celina a marred Trustee, payable in accordance with is an effort to collect a debt on behalf of ceptable to the Trustee, payable in ac- County Recorder of Pima County, Ad- dition, but without covenant or warranty, woman as her sole and separate prop- n a ARS 33-811A), all right, title, and inter- the beneficiary under the referenced cordance with ARS 33-811A), all right, zona. The street addrass/location of the express or implied, regarding title, pos T arty, S. Manta Ray Road Tucson, est conveyed to and now held by it un- Deed of Trust. Any information obtained title; and interest conveyed to and now real property described above is pur- session or encumbrances, to satisfy the AZ 85787 dated September 05 20o . der said Deed of Trust, in the property will be used for that purpose. Unless the' held by it under said Deed of Trust, in ported to be: 6414 N. Tierra De Las indebtedness secured by said Deed d , and recordedOctober005, as In- • recorded October 3, 2005, as situated in said County and State and loan is reinstated, this Trustee's Sale the property situated in said County and Catalinas Tucson, AZ 85718 Tax Parcel Trust, advances thereunder, with inter - ec , No. struof more fully described as: PARCEL 1: All proceedings will result in foreclosure of State and more fully described as: The No.: 108-01-74902 The undersigned est as provided therein, and the unpaid Official Records to the office of the that portion of Parcel 10 (Section 9, the subject property. ASAP# 868213 West 130.00 feet of Lot 6, Block 1, in Trustee disclaims any liability for any in- principal balance of the Note secured County Recorder of Pima County, State Township 15 South, Range 11 East) as PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial VISTA DEL PUEBLO SUBDIVISION, correctness of the street address and by said Deed of Trust with interest of Arizona, will sell the real property ate er recorded in Book 2 at page 82 of Re- Jun 28; Jul 5, 12,19,2007 according to the Plat of Record in the other common designation, if, any, thereon as proved in said Note, plus scribed herein by public auction Sep- cords. of . Survey, Pima County re- trtomaskV868213 rl Office of the County Recorder of Pima shown herein. The beneficiary under fees; charges and expenses of the au timber 12, 2007. at 1 AM, outside corder's Office, Tucson, Arizona, more County, Arizona, recorded in Book 7 of the aforementioned Deed of Trust has Trustee and of the trusts created by the East door. of the new Courts Build- particularly described as follows: COM- NOTICE OF TRUSTEE'S SALE Maps, page 27. Subject to an easement accelerated the Nate secured thereby said Deed of Trust. Current Beneficiary: ing, 110 West Congress, TucsonAZ. MENCING at the Northeast comer of TS# 050 13651 Order # 30066017 Loan for ingress, egress, and utilities over the and has declared the entire unpaid prin- JP Morgan Chase/BS ALT A 2005-8 - �► , , to the highest bidder, for cash the said Section 9, Township 15 South, # 0619269837 NOTICE OF TRUS- - South 15.00 feet thereof. The street ad- cipal balance, as well as any and all Care of / Servicer ASC for Wells Fargo forms which are lawful tender, in the Range 11 East, a. found BCSM; TEE'S SALE The following legally de- dress/location of the real property de- other amounts due in connection with Home Improvement 3476 Stateview 1 United States and acceptable to the THENCE South along the Section line a scribed trust property will be sold, pur- scribed above is purported to be: 1255 said Note and/or Deed of Trust, immedi- Boulevard Fort Mill, SC 29715 Current Trustee, payable in accordance with P Y distance of 1993.52 feet TO A POINT; suant to the power of Sate under that S.' Camino Del Sierra Tucson, AZ slaty due and payable. Said sale will be Trustee Michael A Bosco, Jr. 2525 East ARS 33-811A), all right, title, and inter- THENCE North 89 degrees 59 minutes certain Deed of Trust dated 12/12/2001 85713 Tax Parcel No.: 118-05-008137 made in an "as is' condition, but without Camelback Road #300 Phoenix, Ari est conveyed to and now held by it un- 56 seconds'West, a distance of 40.00 and recorded on 12/19/2001 as Instru- The undersigned Trustee disclaims any covenant or warranty; express or im- zona 85016 (602) 255-6000 Dated : der said Deed of Trust, in the property feet to the West right-of-way Line of ment If 20012440938, Book Page it liability for any incorrectness of the plied, regarding title, possession or en- 06/12/2007/S/Michael A. Bosco, Jr.; At - situated in said County and State and Sandario Road, a 112 inch IP tagged the Office of the County Recorder of street address and other common des- cumbrances, to satisfy the indebted- tomey at Law,Trustee/Successor Trus- more fully described as: Lot 68,of 'LS 16562", being the TRUE POINT OF Pima County, Arizona at public auction ignation, if any, . shown herein. The ness secured by said Deed of Trust, ad- tee under said Deed of Trust, and is DREXEL VISTAS as shown b Ma re, Y p BEGINNING; THENCE continuing. to the highest bidder: Sale Date and beneficiary under the aforementioned. vances thereunder, with interest as pro- .qualified to act as Successor Trustee ' corded in Book 56 of Maps and Plats at North 89 degrees 59 minutes 56 sec- Time: 6/15/2007 at 11:30 AM Sale Lo- Deed of Trust has accelerated the Note vided therein; and the unpaid principal per ARS Section 33-603 (A)2, as a Page 15, Pima County, Arizona, and by onds West a distance of 595.475 feet to cation: At the East entrance of the New secured thereby and has declared the balance of the Note secured by said member of the Arizona State - Bar. Declaration of Scriveners Error re- a 1/2 inch IP tagged 'LS 16562'; Courts Building, 110 West Congress, entire unpaid principal balance, as well Deed of Trust with interest thereon as STATE OF ARIZONA,County of Mari - . Zorded in Docket 12020 at Page 1843. THENCE North a distance of 327.28 Tucson, AZ Legal Description: Lot 106, as any and all other amounts due in ' proved in said Note, plus fees, charges cope This instrument was acknovA- The street address/location of the real feet TO A POINT. Thence South 89 de- of Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood .2, connection with said Note and/or Deed and expenses of the Trustee and of the edged before me on 06/12/2007, by MI- . property described above is purported grees 59 minutes 56 seconds East a Phase 2, according to the plat of record of Trust, immediately due and payable. trusts created- by said Deed of Trust. CHAEL A. BOSCO, JR., Attorney at to be: 5787 S. Manta Ray Road Tuc- distance of 595.475 feet TO A POINT; in the office of the County Recorded Of Said sale will he made in an 'as is' con- Current Beneficiary: U.S.. Bank Law, as Trustee/Successor Trustee. AZ 85706 Tax Parcel No.: THENCE South a distance of 327.28 Pima county, Arizona, recorded in ditfon, but without covenant or warranty, Natl/2006-BC3 Care of / Servicer ASC /S/Jennifer Hamlin, Notary Public Com- son, 138-13-38100 The Undersigned Trustee feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGIN. Book 51 of maps, Page 68. Purported express or implied, regarding title, pos- for Wells Fargo Home Improvement mission expiration is 1/19/2010 disclaims any'liability for any incorrect- NING. PARCEL 2: An easement for in- Street Address: 13469 N Wide View Dr session or encumbrances, to satisfy the 3476 Stateview Boulevard Fort Mill, SC 12:00:00 AM NOTICE: This proceeding . ness of the street address and other grew egress and utilities over the fol- Tucson, AZ 85737 Tax Parcel Number. indebtedness secured by said Deed of 29715 Current Trustee Michael A Bo- -- is an'effort collect a debt on behalf of common designation, if any, shown lowing described parcel: All that portion 219-24-1230 Original Principal Balance: Trust, advances thereunder, with Inter- sco, Jr. 2525 East Camelback. Road the beneficiary under the referenced • herein. The beneficiary under the afore- of Parcel 10 (Section 9, Township 15 $154,400.00 Name and Address of Cur- est.as provided therein, and the unpaid #300 Phoenix, Arizona 85016 (602) Deed of Trust. Any information obtained mentioned, Deed of Trust has acceler- South, Range .11 East) as recorded in rent Beneficiary: Abn Amro Mortgage. principal balance of , the Note secured 255-6000 Dated : 06/07/2007/S/Michael will be used for that purpose. Unless the ated the Note secured thereby and has Book 2 at page 82 of Records of Sur- Group, INC. 7159 Corklan Drive Jack- by- said Deed of Trust with interest A. Bosco, Jr., Attorney at loan is, reinstated, this Trustee's Sale /�- declared the entire unpaid principal bal- vey, Pima County Recorder's Office, sonville, FL 32258 Name and Address thereon as proved in said Note,. plus Law,Trustee/Suocessor Trustee under proceedings will result in foreclosure of, ante, as well as any and all other Tucson, Arizona, more particularly as of Original Trustor. Michael A Collett fees, charges and expenses of the said Deed of Trust, and is qualified to the subject property. ASAP# 868157 amounts due in connection with said follows: COMMENCING at the North- And Brenda L Collett husband and wife ,Trustee and of the trusts created by act as Successor Trustee per ARS Sec- PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial Note and/or Deed of Trust, immediately east comer of said Section 9, Township 13469 N Wide View Dr Tucson, AZ said Deed of Trust. Current Beneficiary: , tion 33.803 (A)2, as a member of the Jun 28; Jul 5, 12,19,2007 due and payable. Said sale will be 15 South, 'Range 11 East, a found 85737 Name and Address of U.S. Bank Nat1/CSFB 2006-8 Care of / Arizona State Bar. STATE OF ARI-' trhelmkamp/868157 d made in an 'as is' condition, but without BCSM; THENCE South along the Sec- Trustee/Agent:.Transnation Title Insur- Servicer Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. ZONA,County of Marfoopa This instru-. NOTICE TRUSTEE'S SALE covenant or warranty, express or im tion line a distance of 1651.24 feet TO A POINT; THENCE North 89 degrees ante Company do LandAmerica De- fault Services Post Office Box 5899 6 do Fidel' National Foreclosure Solu- tbns,1270 Northland Dr., Ste. 200 Men-, _ owledg ment was acknowledged before me on . 06/07/2007, by MICHAEL A. BOSCO, - Fla ID. 1t07-03392 Rendon Notice is hereby given that Michael A. Bosco, Jr., plied, regarding title, possession or en cumbrances, to satisfythe indebted- 59 minutes 56 seconds West a distance Executive Circle Suite 100 Irvine, CA data Heights, MN 55120 Current Trus- JR., Attorney at Law, as Trustee/Suc- Attomey at Law, as trustee (or succes- rasa secured by said Deed of Trust, ad- of 40.00 feet to the West right-of-way 92616 Phone: (949) 885-4500 Sales tee Michael A Bosco, Jr. 2525 East cessor Trustee. /S/Jennifer Hamlin, No- sor trustee, or substituted trustee), r ) vances thereunder, with Interest as pro- line of Sandario Road being the POINT Line: (714) 573.1965 Transnation Tale Camelback Road #300 Phoenix, Ari- tary Public. Commission expiration is anent to the Deed of Trust which had an vided therein, and the unpaid -principal - OF EASEMENT BEGINNING; THENCE continuing North 89 degrees 59 minutes Insurance Company Is a qualified trus-' tee pursuant to the provisions of. A.R.S. zone 85016 (602) 255-6000 Dated: W12/2007/S/Michael A. Bosco, Jr., At. 1/19/2016 12:00:00 AM NOTICE: This proceeding is an effort tolled a debt on $108,00.00 exe- Bandon a single cutedanginal balance -of Rend balance of the Note secured by said thereon Deed of Trust with interest thereon as 56 seconds West a distance of 595.47 33-803 (A) (1) 'An association or corpo- tomey at Law,Trustee/Successor Trus- behalf of the beneficiary under the refer- man, 41 W. Santaberto man, 541 W. Soma Maria St. Tucson, proved in said Note, iris fees, es P� P charges feet TO A POINT. THENCE South 15.00 feet TO A POINT. THENCE ration doing business under the taws of - this state as a ...Insurance Company..' tee under said Deed of Trust, and. is qualified to act as Successor Trustee enced Deed. of Trust. Any information obtained will be used for that purpose. AZ 85706 , dated August 15, 2006 and ' recorded August 21, 2006, as Instnr 9 and expenses of the Trustee and of the ' trusts created. by said Deed of Trust. South 89 degrees 59 minutes 56 sec- deg Said Tuustee is regulated State re9 by per ARS Section as r. Unless the loan is reinstated, this Trus- ment NoJDocket-Pa a 12872-4054 of - 9 Current Beneficiary. HSBC Mtg Serv- ciaof ands East a distance of 595.47 feet TO Banking Department If the Trustee is Arizona State member of the Arizona State Bar. tee'S Sale proceedings .will result in . Official Records in the office of the ices, Inc. Care Servicer HSBC Mort- A POINT; THENCE North a distance of 15.00 feet to the POINT OF EASE- unable to convey title for any reason, the successful bidder's sole and exclu- STATE OF ARIZONA,County of Mari- cops This instrument was acknowl- foreclosure of the subject property. ASAP# 868269 County Recorder of Pima County, State gage Services, Inc. do Fidelity National Default Default Solutions 1270 Northland Drive, MENT BEGINNING. EXCEPT anr- y po sive rem shall be the return of mo- remedy edged before me on 06/12/2007, by MI- . PUBISH: The Dolly Territorial of Arizona, will sell the real r de. property scribed herein try public auction on Se - Sep . 200 Mendota Heights. MN 55120 lying tion thereof i within Parcel No. 1. The street ack resslbcadon of the real nies paid to the Trustee, and the suc- cessful bidder shall have no further re CHAEL A. BOSCO, JR., Attorney at Law, as Trustee/Successor Trustee. Jun 28; Jul 5,12,19, 2007 trdokken/868269 rj tember 12, 2007 at 11:30 AM, outside Current Trustee Michael A Bosco, Jr. 2525NOTICE East Camelback Road - #300 Property described above is purported course. Dated: 5/7/2007 Transnation Tr /S/Jennrfer Hamlin, Notary Public Conn- OF TRUSTEE'S SALE the East door of the new Courts Build - ing, 110 West Congress, Tucson, AZ. , -Phoenix Arizona 85016. (602) 255 6000 to be: 5980 S. Sandario Rd. Tucson, AZ �735 Tax Parcel No.: 209 10-052C0 tie Insurance Company By: Tina Su hkonen, Assistant Secretary State mission expiration is " 1/19/2010 ' 12;00;00 AM NOTICE:,Thts proceeding • File ID. #07-41098 Helmkamp Notice is to the highest bidder for cash (in the Dated., 06/12/2007/S/Michael A. Bosco, Jr., Attorney at Lew,Trustee/Successor The undersigned Trustee disclaims any of California County of .Orange On ,. is an effort to collect a debt on behalf of hereby given that Michael A. Bosco, Jr., Attorney at Law, as trustee (or succes- forms which are lawful tender in the United States and _acceptable to the Trustee under said Deed of Trust, and liability for any incorrectness of the street address and other common des- 05/07/2007 before me, the undersigned Notary Public, personalty appeared Tina the beneficiary under the referenced. Deed of Trust. Any information obtained sor trustee, or substituted trustee), ur- ) P suant to the Deed of Trust which had an Trustee, payable in accordance with P y ARS 33-811A); all right, title, and inter- Is qualified to act as Successor Trustee per ARS Section 33-803 (A)2, as a ignation, if any, shown herein. The " Suihkonen personalty (mown to me (or to me on the basis of satisfao- will be used for that purpose. Unless the -loan. exe- original balance of $kamp, der conveyed to ersd now held lt urn member of the Arizona State Bar. beneficiary under the aforementioned Deed of Trust has accelerated the Note - .proved Cory evidence) t/ be the person(s) t is reinstated, this Trustee's Sate proceedings will result foreclosure of anted b Melissa Helmkam an u y p, an unman- ried woman, 11046 W. Jute Way property der said Deed of Trust, in the ro p party situated in said County and State and STATE OF ARIZONA;County of Mari- cope instrument - was acknowl-, secured thereby and has declared the entire unpaidprincipal balance, as well P whose names) is/are sub3cribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to Ain the subject property. ASAP# 868234 PUBLISH: The Dat Territorial IY Marana; AZ. 85653 dated June 10, more fullydescribed as: Lot 366, of FI- befs edged before me on l�/12/2007, MI- byM CHAEL A. BOSCO, JR., Attorney at as any and all other amounts due in me that he/shelthey executed the same Jun 28; Jul 5,12,19, 2007 2005 and recorded June 16, 2005, as Instrument NOJDocket-Pa ge ESTA PARK, according to the Plat o} record in the office of the County Re Trustee. as Trustlin, connection with said Note and/or Deed of Trust, immediately due and payable. in his/her/their authorized capactty(ies), and that by his/herRheir signature(s) on treelas/866234 rjLaw, 12575-3858 of Official Records in the corder of Pima County, Arizona, re- ty, /SrJennifer Hamlin, Notary Public Com �. /S/J Notary P mission expiration Is 1/19/2010 Said sale will be made in an 'as is' con- the instrument the person(s), or the ern- NOTICE OF TRUSTEE'S SALE Fie; ID. #07-40978 Dokken Notice is. office of the CountyRecorder of Pima County,State of Arizona, will sell the erordexJ in Book 15 of Ma 17. Maps, Page real The street address/location of the real 12:00:00 AM NOTICE: This proceeding dition, but without covenant or warranty, express or implied, p p regarding title, pas tity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the Instrument. Witness hereby given that Michael A. Bosco, Jr., real property described herein by public property described above is purported Is an effort coiled a debt on behalf of beneficiary under the referenced session or encumbrances, to satisfy the my hand and" official seal. Signature Attorney a ( ey t Law, as trustee or succes- ). pur- sor trustee, or substituted trustee rAM,the auction. on Se ember 12, 2007 at September outside the East door of the to be: 541 W. Santa Marla St. Tucson, Tax Parcel Deed of Trust. Any information obtained indebtedness secured by said Deed of Trust, advances thereunder, with inter- Amy Marie Lemus (Seal). This office is attempting to collect a debt and any in- to the Deed of Trust which had new our West Con- new Courts .Building, 1 13 -3570 The undersigned Trustee -Trustee will wilt be used for that purpose. Unless the ban is reinstated, this Trustee's Sale eat as provided therein, and the unpaid formation obtained will be used for that origin e- original balance of $155,200.00 exe- cuted t(athe Dokken, a marred by he rasa, Tucson, AZ , to the hi hest bid• 9 9 der for cash in the forms which are law- disclaims any disclaims an liability for an Y ltY Y incorrect - rasa of the street address and other other proceedings will result in foreclosure of principal balance of the Note secured said Deed Trust with interest purpose. P300698 PUBLISH: The Deily Territorial woman, as her sole and separate prop- p p p ful tender in the United States and ac- common deer nation, ff , shown g y - the subject property. ASAP# 868168 thereon thereon as proved in said Note, plus a Jun 28; 5,12,19, 2007 ,19, 2 arty., 6414 N. Tierta' De Las CataOnas e ce table to the Trustee, p payable in ac- herein. The beneficiary under the afore under PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial fees, charges and expenses the treollett/J00698 rj rc Tucson, AZ 85718 , dated June 6, 2006 cordance with ARS 33.811A , al right, ) 9 mentioned Deed of Trust has acceler- Jun 28; Ju15,12, i9, 2007 to Trustee and of the trusts created by and recorded June 9, 2006, as Instnu- title, and interest conveyed to and now Y ated the Note secured there and has by trzatareirV868168 h said Deed of Trust. Current Beneficiary: NOTICE OF TRUSTEE'S SALE ment NoJDocket-Pa 12822-923 of held it under said Deed of Trust, in declared the entire unpaid principal bal- P ry� File ID. #07.03504 Sales Notice is Official Records in the office of the the property situated In said County and ante, as well as any and all other a NOTICE OF TRUSTEE'S SALE Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. Care of / hereby given that Michael A. Bosco, Jr., County Recorder of Pima County, State State and more fully described as: Lot amounts due in connection with said File .ID. #07-03391 Tomaski Notice is Servicer Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. - Attorneyat Law, as trustee or succes- ( of Arizona, will sell the real property P Party de 41, OF FINAL PLAT OF GLADDEN Note and/or Deed of Trust, immediately hereby given that Michael A. Bosco, Jr., do Fidelity National Foreclosure Solu sor trustee, or substituted trustee), pur- scribed herein by public auction on Sep- FARMS BLOCK 12, according to the ,. due and payable. Said sale will be Attorney at Law, as trustee (or succes- lions 1270 Northland Dr., Ste. 200 Men- suant to the Deed of Trust which had an tember 7, 2007 at 11:30. AM, outside plat of record in the office of the County made in an 'as ie condition, but without sor trustee, or substituted trustee), pur- JUNE 28, 2007, The Daily Territorial PAGE 19 THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), the man Defendants HEATHER M. LONG SUPERIOR COURT By: Deputy spouse,the petitioner, at the address o ! PROGRAM community, must use the modified BFEs and JOHN DOE LONG, wife and hus- Clerk listed at the top of this Summons. On February 8, 1999, the Department of to administer the floodplain manage- band No. C20070536 CIVIL SUMMONS PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial 3. If this Summons and the other Court Homeland Security's Federal Emer- ment measures of the NFIP. These' Assigned To: JOHN DAVIS Jun 7,14, 21, 28, 2007 Papers were served upon you within the ! gency Management Agency identified - modified-BFEs will also be used to cat- THE STATE OF -ARIZONA to the smgracia rj State of Arizona, your Response must Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs) in' culate the appropriate flood insurance - above -named Defendant HEATHER M. be filed within Twenty (20) Calendar TOWN OF HAYDEN the City of Tucson, Arizona through is- premium rates for new buildings and LONG 1901 N. Santa Rosa Tucson, SUMMONS Days ' from the date of service, not PUBLIC NOTICE suance of a Flood Insurance Rate Map their contents and for the second layer AZ 85712 RODAM ALBERTO CORREA COR- counting the day of service. If the pa- �. STREET IMPROVEMENTS (FIRM). The Mitigation Division has de- of insurance, on existing buildings and I A lawsuit has been Tiled against you. DOVA pars were served upon yoq outside of 520 VELASCO AVENUE, HAYDEN ternined that modification of the Base contents. II If you do not want a Judgment taken - 438 W 38TH ST the State of Arizona, your Response Y (1-percent-annual-chance) Flood Eleva- ' The Town of Hayden has been awarded ( I U n the second publication of notice of Upon p against you for the .relief demanded in 9 Y TUCSON AZ 85713 mutt be filed within Thi 30 Calendar Thirty ( ) a Federal CommunityDevelopment P lions (BFEs) for certain locations in this these changes in this newspaper, any the accompanying Complaint, you must SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA, Days, not counting the day of service. Block Grant (CDBG) from the Arizona community is appropriate. The modified person has 90 days in which he or. she file a Response in writing in the Office COUNTY OF PIMA 4. You should also be aware that you Dept. of Housing and will accept bids P 9 P BFEs revise the FIRM for the commu- caa request, through the Chief Execu- of the Clerk of the Superior Court, 4 10 In re the marriage of AL- and/or your spouse may file a Petition in from qualified firms or individuals with a q nity. - five Officer of the community, that the West Congress, Tucson, Arizona, ac- DODAM BERTO CORREA CORDOVA, Peti- the Conciliation Court for the purpose of minimum of a B-2 commercial license The changes are being made pursuant Mitigation Division reconsider the deter- companied by the necessary filing fee.. tioner, and MARTHELL REBOLLEDO Preserving the Marriage by taking ad - as registered with the Arizona Registrar to Section 206 oT the Flood Disaster mination. Any request for reconsiders- A copy of the Response must also be Respondent. CASE NO. vantage of the Conciliation Services of Contractors to perform the following Pe 9 .Protection Act of 1973 (Public Law 93 lion must be, based on knowledge. of mailed to the plaintiff /attomey whose D20070D20070 394 SUMMONS (Family Law) Provided by the Conciliation Court. 'accommoda- services: 234) and are in accordance with the Na- - changed conditions or new scientific or name appears above. RICHARD C. HENRY. WARNING. 5. Request for reasonable Removal of 1.5" of existing base and re- tional Flood Insurance Ad of 1968, as technical data. All interested parties are III The Response must be filed within THIS IS AN OFFICIAL DOWMENT tions for persons with disabilities must pave San Pedro from the Lower Road Pa amended (Title XIII of the Housing and on notice that until the 90 day period TWENTY DAYS, exclusive of the date FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT THAT be made to the Court by the parties at intersection to 12th Street. Urban Development Act of 1968, Public elapses, the Mitigation Division's deter- of service, if served within the State of AFFECTS YOUR RIGHTS. READ THIS least Three (3) Working Days in ad - For additional information on plan and law 90 448), 42 U.S.C. 4001 4128, and mination to modify the BFEs may itself Arizona, or within THIRTY DAYS, exclu- SUMMONS CAREFULLY. IF YOU DO vane of a scheduled Court Hearing... spec review locations and how to obtain 44 CFR Part 65. be changed. stye of the date of service, A served out- NOT UNDERSTAND R, CONTACT AN GIVEN UNDER THE HAND AND SEAL plans and specifications, as well as ad- A hydraulic analysis was performed to y y p An y person having knowledge or wish- side the State of Arizona. ATTORNEY FOR LEGAL ADVICE LEGALICETO: of the Superior Court of the State of Ad- ditional bidding procedures contact: incorporate a storm drain system along ing to comment on 'these changes IV This is a legal document. If you do THE STATE OF ARIZONA STATE )3¢ zone in and for the•said County, this _ Project Manager, Heather Patel, Central Arroyo Chico from just upstream of Al- should immediately notify: not understand its consequences, you DAM O CORDOVA. day of _, 20_. APR 27 2007. PATRICIA Arizona - Association of Governments vemon Way to just upstream of Colum- ' The Honorable Bob Walkup Mayor, City .'should seek the advice of an attorney. The Respondent A. NOLAND CLERK OF THE SUPE- (CAAG), 1075 South Idaho Road, Suite bus Boulevard and channeiizatlon from of Tucson P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, AZ Requests for reasonable accommo- 1 • A lawsuit has been filed against you. RIOR COURT By: /6/ ERNESTO CAM- 300, Apache Junction, AZ 85219 at just upstream of Columbus Boulevard to 85726 dation for persons with disabilities' A copy of the lawsuit and other related BRON, Deputy Clerk phone number 480 474-9300, fax ( ) just downstream of Swan Road and has - PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial must be made to the court by parties court. paperwork is Served o. you with PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial +� (480) 474-9306, or e-mail: resulted in an increase in SFHA width, Jun 21, 28, 2007 at least three (3) working days in ad- this Summons. Jun 7,14, 21, 28, 2007 hiht�rtGcaagGentral.org. The Town a decrease in $FHA width, increased will conduct a rebid conference and P BFEs, and decreased BFEs for Arroyo . 7-09-0707P vane of a scheduled court proceed-.. Ing. WITNESS My Hand and the Seal nt taken 2. If you do not want' jur smahepard rj site inspection on Monday, July 9, 2007 Chico, The table below indicated exist- of the Superior Court: DATED: FEB 1 in against you without your input, you must file a Response in writing with the beginning at 10:00 a.m. Interested bid- ing and modified BFEs for selected lo- • 2007 CLERK OF THE SUPERIOR Court and you must pay the required ders should meet at the Hayden Town cations along the affected lengths of the Hall, 520 Velasco Avenue, Hayden, Ari- flooding COURT PATRICIA A NOLAND (SUPE- RIOR COURT SEAL) By /zIDeputy filing fees. To file your Response, take source(s) cited above. zone 85235, 520 356 7801. ( ) Existing Modified _ ! Clerk To obtain a copy of the Summons or send the papers to the Office of the Sealed bids will be received in the office BFE BFE NOTICE OF SALE and Complaint filed in this action, con - Clerk of the Superior Court, located at: You will also need to mail a copy Of the Town Clerk, Hayden Town Hall, Location (feet)' tfeetl• Velasco Avenue, Box B. DODGE INTREPID tad in writing: prior to June 30, 2007, _ of the Response to your spouse, the pe 520 Hayden. Y Just upstream of Arizona 85235 until 3:00 m. on Thurs- P� Alvemon Way 2,506 2,504 ID#2 ID# 283HD46R32H277598 Austin J. Horan, Esq., 3131 E. 2nd Street; Tucson, Arizona, 85716; on and at the address listed at the top NOTICE OF TRUSTEE'S SALE day. July 2007- PUBLISH: The Dail Territorial. Approximately Y 1999 NISSAN SENTRA SE 4DR ID#3N1 BB41 D2XL001999 . after June 30, 2007, contact, in writing; of theer, of this Summons. 3: If this summons and the other Court TS# 002-13708 Order # 30066651 Loan # 0000322860982 feet downstream of o June 28, 2007 Swan Road None 2.540 IS BEING SOLD BY LIENHOLDER AT Austin Horan, Esq., son N. Court Avenue, 2nd Floor, Tucson, Arizona, papers were served upon you within the The following legally described trust n520velasco m P )• 'National Geodetic Vertical Datum,. •PUBLIC AUCTION TO HIGHEST BID- - , - 85701 (520) 318-1100. State of Arizona, your Response must property will be sold, pursuant to the PUBLIC NOTICE rounded to nearest whole foot DER ON DUNE 29, 2007; 10:00 A.M. AT 4962 E NEBRASKA; TUCSON, AZ . PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial be filed within Twenty -(20) Calendar Days from the date of service, not power of Sale under that certain Deed of Trust dated I Otl3/2004 and recorded CHANGES ARE MADE IN DETERMI- Under the above -mentioned. Ads . Of SALE tS SUBJECT TO RE- Jun 28; Jul 5,12,19, 2007 day of service. If the a- counting y p on 10/19/2004 as Instrument # 1968 and 1973, the Miti tion Division NATIONS OF BASE FLOOD ELEVA- Mitigation DEMP BY ORIGINAL OWNER smfossetV20070536 th _ persthe pars were served upon you outside the Book Page TIONS FOR THE CITY OF TUCSON must develop criteria for floodplain man- PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA, UNDER agement. To participate in the National PRIOR T PRIOR TO AUCTION. State Arizona, your Response must in the Office County er of in the Office of the County Recorder of RESERVES THE RIGHT TO BID. LO- TO BID. LO- .SUMMONS be filed within Thirty (30) Calendar d pima County, Arizona at public auction CATION AND TIME FOR INSPEC- Oscar Gracia Jr Days, not counting the day of service. to the .highest bidder. Sale Date and NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TION: 4962 E . NEBRASKA; TUCSON, P808 W palmetto 4. You should also be aware that you Time: 8/20/2007 at 11:30 AM Sale Lo- BEFORE THE AZ 85706 JUNE 28, 2007 AT 8:00 AM. Tucson. AZ 85705 and/or your spouse may file a Petition in cation: At the East entrance of the New ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PUBLIC OR DEALER BIDS WELCOME ARIZONA SUPERIOR COURT, PIMA the Conciliation Court for the purpose of Courts Building, 110 West Congress, Notice is provided that the Oro Valley Planning and Zoning Commission will con- PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial COUNTY COUNT preserving the Marriage by taking ad- Tucson, AZ Legal Description: Lot 15, dud a public hearing at or after. Jun 28, 2007 Oscar Gracia Jr. Petitioner/Plaintiff and vantage of the Conciliation Services 'block 5, of Mission Terrace according to 6:00 pm, Thursday, July 12, 2007 sljun29dodge th Laura N. Teiada. Respondent/Defen- provided by the Conciliation Court. the map recorded in book 12 of maps Oro Valley Town Hall,11,000 N. La Cahads Drive dent. Case No. D20064386 SUMMONS 5. Request for reasonable accommoda- page 92, records of Pima County, Ari- Oro Valley, Arizona NOTICE OF. SALE (Family Law) KYLE A. BRYSON tions for persons with disabilities must zona. Purported Street Address: 2562 Public Hearing: OV9-07-02A, The Planning Center, representing NCH Cor- NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN PURSU-. WARNING. THIS IS AN OFFICIAL be made to the Court by the parties at West San Paulus Road Tucson, AZ porationfrranswest Properties, proposes text amendments to Policy 9 for ANT TO ARIZONA SELF -STORAGE DOCUMENT FROM THE COURT least Three (3) Working days in ad- 85746 Tax Parcel Number. Neighborhood 3 of the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development (PAD) and to CODE SECTION 33-1704 THE UN- THAT AFFECTS YOUR RIGHTS. vance of a scheduled Court Hearing. 137-25-11307 Original Principal Bal- Section 24.1.B.1.b.1 of the Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District in the DERSIGNED U-STORE-IT MINI READ THIS SUMMONS CAREFULLY. GIVEN UNDER THE HAND AND SEAL once: $28,200.00 Name and Address of OVZCR to allow for a reduced building setback for a proposed hotel; to amend WAREHOUSE CO. AT 2545 South IF YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND IT, of the Superior Court of the State of Ari- Current Beneficiary: Deutsche Bank Na- the Permitted Uses and Development Standards for the Campus Park Industrial Sixth Ave., TUCSON AZ 85713 WILL CONTACT AN ATTORNEY FOR LE- zone in and for the said County, this _ tional Trust Company as Trustee, 4837 (CPI) Land Use District within the Rancho Vistoso PAD; and to add Hotel to the SELL AT PUBLIC AUCTION ON July GAL ADVICE day of Feb. -2 2007, 20_. CLERK OF Watt Avenue Suite 100 North Highland, Permitted uses and allow for a maximum height for a proposed hotel up to 75 12, 2007 THE FOLLOWING DE- FROM THE STATE OF ARIZONA TO' Sa THE SUPERIOR COURT PATRICIA A. CA 95660 Name and Address of Origi- feet. SCRIBED PROPERTY, TO WIT: Laura N. TE NOLAND By: /g/ Deputy Clerk (Seal) nal Trustor. Patricia Delgado a married The applicant is requesting the code amendments to allow for the construction of NAME UNIT# DESCRIPTION OF 1. A lawsuit has been filed against you. PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial woman as her sole and separate prop a hotel on their parcel, located in the southern portion of Rancho Vistoso Neigh- ITEMS A copy of the lawsuit and other related Jun 7,14, 21. 28, 2007 arty 2562 West San Paulus Road Tuc- borhood 3, east of Innovation Park Drive on the north. side of Tangerine Road. Robert C AS Misc household court paperwork is served on you with smcordovs rj son, AZ 85746 Name and Address of The parcel number is 223-02-021D. Miller goods this Summons. Trustes/Agent: Transnation Tide Insur- A complete description and draft of the proposed code amendments are avail- James R. - C 8 Misc. household 2. If you do not want a judgment taken SUMMONS ante Company cto LandAmerica Do- able at the Town Hall, Planning and Zoning Department. This notice and a map Bembury goods - against you without your input, you Gaedith Lourene Sheoard fault Services Post Office Box 5899 6 of . the proposed amendments are available at Gloria C22 Misc household . must file a Response in writing with the 7331 E 42ndStreet Executive Circle Suite 100 Irvine, CA httnJ/www.townoforovalley,pom/PZtHeadnas PZhtm. Hamelitz goods Court, and you must pay the required Tucson AZ B5730 92616 Phone: (949) 885-4500 Sales Members of the public are invited to attend this meeting and will be given an op- Maria L . F16 Misc household filing fee. To file your Response, take or Petitioner in pro per Line: (714) 573-1965 Transnation Title Portunity to speak. For additional information, please contact Matt Michels, OV Brave goods send the papers to; Office of the Clerk SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA. Insurance Company is a qualified trus- Senior Planner at 520.229.4822 or mmichelsOorovallay.net Juan Castro F38 Misc household of the Superior Court, 110 West Con COUNTY OF E MA tee pursuant to the provisions of A.R.S. PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial Vazquez goods gress, Tucson, Arizona II5701. Mail a . In re the marriage of Gaedith Lorene 9 33-803 (A). (1) "An association or corpo- ' June 28, 2007 Dan F45 Misc household copy of the Response to your spouse, Shepard, Petitioner, and Steven Doug- ration doing business under the laws of. pnov9.07.02a r) Montgomery goods the Petitioner, at the address listed on las Shepard. Respondent. CASE NO. Otis state as a ...Insurance Company..." Garridon J H12 Misc household the top of this Summons. D20071579, SUMMONS (Family Law) If the Trustee is unable to convey title` NOTICE OF REVIEW Grady goods -3. If this Summons and the other court KAREN S. ADAM for any reason, the successful bidders BEFORE THE Leroy Leslie H15 Misc household papers were served on you within the WARNING. THIS IS AN OFFICIAL sole and exclusive remedy shall be the ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL goods State of Arizona, your Response must DOCUMENT FROM THE SUPERIOR return of monies paid to the Trustee; Notice is provided that the Oro Valley Town Council will conduct a public meet- Sharon H17 Misc household be filed within TWENTY (20) CALEN- COURT THAT AFFECTS YOUR and the successful bidder shall have no ing at or after. Warrior goods DAR DAYS from the date of the service, RIGHTS. READ THIS 'SUMMONS further recourse. Dated: 5/11/2007 7:00 pm, Wednesday, July 18, 2DO7 SAID SALE IS FOR THE PURPOSE not counting the day of service. If the CAREFULLY. IF YOU DO NOT UN-: Transnaton Title Insurance Company Oro Valley Town Hall,11,000 N. La Canada Drive OF SATISFYING LIEN OF THE UN- papers were served on you outside the DERSTAND IT, CONTACT AN . AT- t By: Tina Suihkonen, Assistant Secre- ' Oro Valley, Arizona DERSIGNED FOR STORAGE FEES State of Arizona, your Response must TORNEY FOR LEGAL ADVICE. tary State of California County of Or- OV12-0535A, The applicant requests to appeal the Development Review TOGETHER WITH THE COSTS OF be filed within THIRTY (30) CALENDAR THE STATE OF ARIZONA TO: Steven ange On SII M007 before me, the un- Board's decision to deny approval of a revision to the approved landscape plans ADVERTISING AND. EXPENSES OF DAYS, not counting the day of service. Douglas Sheoard. The Respondent. dersigned Notary Public, personally ap-. for the Vistoso Memorial Chapel, located at .the comer of Rancho Vistoso Blvd. SALE. /g/ Michele Miller General Man- 4. Requests for reasonable accommo- 1- A lawsuit has been filed against you. peared Tina Suihkonen, personally and Vistoso Commerce Loop. ager dations for persons with disabilities A copy of the lawsuit and other related known to me (or proved to me on the The Development Review Board denied the revision to the landscape plans for PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial must be made to the court by parties at court paperwork is served on you with basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the the Vistoso memorial Chapel on June 4th, 2007. The applicant is appealing this Jun 28; Jul 5, 2007 least 3 working days in advance of a this Summons. person(s) whose name(s) Ware sub - denial to the Town Council. The revision entails replacing select screen wall with sljult2/units rj scheduled court proceeding. 2. If you do not want a judgment taken scribed to the within instrument and ac- berms and landscaping. A complete description and map 'of the request is available at the Town Hall, I S. Either spouse, or both spouses, may file in the conciliation court, a petition in- against you without your , input, you must file a Response in writing with the . - knowledged to me that he/sheAhey exe- cuted the same in his/herAh_ eir author - Planning and ZoningDepartment. This notice and map are available at voking the jurisdiction of the court for Court, and you must pay The required ized capacity(es), and that by btW j www townoforovalley.com/PZ(Hearings PZ. m ! the purpose of preserving the marriage filing fees. To file your Response, take histher/their signature(s) on the instru- - Members of the public are invited to attend this meeting and will be given an op- by effecting conciliation between the or send the papers to the Office of the merit the person(s), or the entity upon POrtunity to speak. An agenda for this meeting will be made available at least 24 parties. GIVEN under my hand and the Clerk of the Superior Court, located behalf of which the person(s) acted, y• hours prior to meeting time. If you have any questions about this matter, please SUMMONS Seal of the Superior Court of the State at SUPERIOR COURT CLERKS OF- executed Ole instrument. Witness. my ' contact Pamela J. Pelletier, Planner at 229.4813. or p2elletier0orovalley.net. ARIZONA SUPERIOR COURT, of Arizona in and for the County of Pima FICE 110 WEST CONGRESS TUC- hand and official seal. Signature Amy PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial PIMA COUNTY this day of Sep 14 2006. 20_. PA- SON, AZ 85701 You will also need to Marie Lemus (Seal). This office is at - June 28, 2007 - Plaintiffs KEVIN M. FOSSETT, a single _ TRICIA A. NOLAND CLERK OF THE : mail a copy of the Response to your tempting to collect a debt and any infor- pnov12-0536a rj 'Jot-v7-6zP- AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF ARIZONA ss. COUNTY OF PIMA Jamie Macias, being first duly sworn, deposes and says that (s)he is the Legal Advertising Manager of THE DAILY TERRITORIAL, a daily newspaper printed and published in the County of Pima, State of Arizona, and of general circulation in the City of Tucson, County of Pima, State of Arizona and elsewhere, and the hereto attached: NOTICE OF HEARING OCTOBER 17, 2007 OV9-07-02A was printed and published correctly in the regular and entire issue of said THE DAILY TERRITORIAL for 1 issues; that was first made on the 1st day of October 2007 and the last publication thereof was made on the 1st day of October 2007 ; that said publication was made on each of the following dates, to -wit: 10/01 /07 at the Request of: Town of Oro Valley - Comm. Development ITIn, by `, Legal Advertising Manager Sub6i d and sworn to before me thi 1 st day of October 2007 . Notary Public in and for the Co of of Pima, State of Arizona R(iIaQIC COMES Nctary Public - Arizona My commission expires: // j —(�-/i-1 Pima County Expires 21/ol/o8 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL Notice is provided that the Oro Valiey Town Council will conduct a publi� at or after: 7:00 pm, Wednesday, October 17, 2007 Oro Valley Town Hall, 11,000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley, Arizona Public Hearing: OV9-07-02A, NCH Cerporation/rranswest Properties, being represented by The Planning Center, proposes to amend the Permitted Uses and Development Standards for the Campus Park Industrial (CPI) Land Use Dis- trict within the Rancho Vistoso PAD to add Hotel to the permitted uses; and allow for a maximum height for a proposed hotel up to 75 feet. The applicant is requesting the code amendments to allow for the construction of a hotel to be located in the southern portion of Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 3, east of Innovation Park Drive on the north side of Tangerine Road. The parcel number is 223-02-021 D_ A complete description and draft of the proposed code amendments are avail- able at the Town Hall, Planning and Zoning Department. Members of the public are invited to attend this meeting and will be given an op- portunity to speak. For additional information, please contact Matt Michels, OV Senior Planner at 520.229.4822 or mmichelsCorovallev.net PUBLISH: The Dally Territorial October 1, 2007 hrov"7-02a rj NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL Notice is provided that the Oro Valley Town Council will conduct a public hearing at or after: 7:00 pm, Wednesday, October 17, 2007 Oro Valley Town Hall,11,000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley, Arizona Public Hearing: OV9-07-02A, NCH Corp o ration/Transwest Properties, being represented by The Planning Center, proposes to amend the Permitted Uses and Development Standards for the Campus Park Industrial (CPI) Land Use District within the Rancho Vistoso PAD to add Hotel to the permitted uses, and allow for a maximum height for a proposed hotel up to 75 feet. The applicant is requesting the code amendments to allow for the construction of a hotel to be located in the southern portion of Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 3, east of Innovation Park Drive on the north side of Tangerine Road. The parcel number is 223-02-021D. A complete description and draft of the proposed code amendments are available at the Town Hall, Planning and Zoning Department. Members of the public are invited to attend this meeting and will be given an opportunity to speak. For additional information, please contact Matt Michels, OV Senior Planner at 520.229.4822 or mmichelsgorovalley.net David Ronquillo Senior Planner Posted:9-27-07 Time: 4:00 p.m. By: drm F:\OV\OV9\2007\9-07-02A\Notices\TC.NOTICE 10-17-07.doc AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF ARIZONA ) ss. COUNTY OF PIMA ) Jamie Macias, being first duly sworn, deposes and says that (s)he is the Legal Advertising Manager of THE DAILY TERRITORIAL, a daily newspaper printed and published in the County of Pima, State of Arizona, and of general circulation in the City of Tucson, County of Pima, State of Arizona and elsewhere, and the hereto attached: PUBLIC NOTICE OV9-07-02A was printed and published correctly in the regular and entire issue of said THE DAILY TERRITORIAL for 1 issues; that was first made on the 28th day of June 2007 and the last publication thereof was made on the 28th day of June 2007 ; that said publication was made on each of the following dates, to -wit: 06/28/07 at the Request of: Oro Valley Town Hall by Su 1 ,Legal Advertising Manager and sworn to before me this 28th day of June 2007 . JOtdES labROBBIE Notary Public - Arizona Pima County Expires 11/01/08 Notary Public in and for the Courttj of Pima, State of Arizona My commission expires: L 1 r-0 110 �� - NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING f • BEFORE THE ORQVALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Notice is provided that the Oro Valley Planning and Zoning Commission w, on. duct C public hearing at or after: 6:00 pm, Thursday, July 12, 2007 Oro Valley Town Hall, 11,000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley, Arizona Public Hearing: OV9-07-02A, The Planning Center, representing NCH Cor- porationlTranswest Properties, proposes text amendments to Policy 9 for Neighborhood 3 of the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development (PAD) and to Section 24.1.B.t.b.i of the Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District in the OVZCR to allow for a reduced building setback for a proposed hotel; to amend the Permitted Uses and Development Standards for the Campus Park Industrial (CPI) Land Use District within the Rancho Vistoso PAD; and to add Hotel to the permitted uses and allow for a maximum height for a proposed hotel up to 75 feet. The applicant is requesting the code amendments to allow for the construction of a hotel on their parcel, located in the southern portion of Rancho Vistoso Neigh- borhood 3, east of Innovation Park Drive on the north side of Tangerine Road. The parcel number is 223.02-021 D. A complete description and draft of the proposed code amendments are avail- able at the Town Hall, Planning and Zoning Department. This notice and a map of the proposed amendments are available at httoa/Avww townoforcyall com/o tHarinas p htm. Members of the public are invited to attend this meeting and will be given an op- portunity to speak. For additional information, please contact Matt Michels, OV Senior Planner at 520.229.4822 or mmichels@oroval)ev.net PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial June 28, 2007 pnov9-07-02a r) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Notice is provided that the Oro Valley Planning and Zoning Commission will conduct a public hearing at or after: 6:00 pm, Thursday, July 12, 2007 Oro Valley Town Hall,11,000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley, Arizona Public Hearing: OV9-07-02A, The Planning Center, representing NCH Corporation/Transwest Properties, proposes text amendments to Policy 9 for Neighborhood 3 of the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development (PAD) and to Section 24.1.B.l.b.i of the Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District in the OVZCR to allow for a reduced building setback for a proposed hotel; to amend the Permitted Uses and Development Standards for the Campus Park Industrial (CPI) Land Use District within the Rancho Vistoso PAD; and to add Hotel to the permitted uses and allow for a maximum height for a proposed hotel up to 75 feet. The applicant is requesting the code amendments to allow for the construction of a hotel on their parcel, located in the southern portion of Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 3, east of Innovation Park Drive on the north side of Tangerine Road. The parcel number is 223-02-021D. A complete description and draft of the proposed code amendments are available at the Town Hall, Planning and Zoning Department. This notice and a map of the proposed amendments are available at http://www.townoforovallgy.com/PZ/Hearings PZ.htm. Members of the public are invited to attend this meeting and will be given an opportunity to speak. For additional information, please contact Matt Michels, OV Senior Planner at 520.229.4822 or mmichels@orovalle, S�s 6��A . - -"%-, — David Ronquillo IN Senior Planner Posted: 6-25-07 Time: 4:30 p.m. By: drm F:\OV\OV9\2007\9-07-02A\Notices\PZ.NOTICE.doc