Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOV1700950-40 y OQO� Y 1 � f ► .� 1 41 �VNDED,91a� -Town of Oro Valley Community Developmentand Public Works March 15, 2018 Kenneth Perry, P.E. Perry Engineering 505 West Wetmore Road Tucson, AZ 85705 Re: Big Horn Commerce Center, OV1700950 Final Site Plan, Final Landscape Plan, Final Rainwater Harvesting Plan, & PreliminaryDrainage Report: 4th review Dear Kenneth, The Development and Infrastructure Services Engineering Permitting Review Department has completed the fourth review of referenced Final Design submittal package and has deemed this plan set "Approved". The engineering review,.and the comments provided, are to verify general conformance to applicable requirements of the Town of Oro Valley, including applicable Standards, Codes, and Ordinances. However, it is the responsibility of the Registrant, sealing the plans, to certify the proposed design meets all Town of Oro Valley Standards, Codes and Ordinances, including any applicable County, State and Federal Standards and requirements. If you have any questions, please contact me at (520) 229-482.3 or mmillera-orovalleyaz.gov Sincerely, 0 JKsrw cv 1i� '�� Marvin Miller Engineering Design Reviewer Town of Oro Valley 520.229.4823 Oro Valley, it's in our nature. 11000 N. La Canada Drive, Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 www.orovalleyaz.gov I phone: (520) 229-4800 1 fax: (520) 742-1022 oQOJ�IEV gq�0 SOUNDED 1'.31A Town of Oro Valley Community Development and Public Works October 10, 2017 Kenneth Perry, PE Perry Engineering, LLC 505 West Wetmore Road, Tucson, AZ 85705 Plan Check No.: OV12-05-23, G1602254, and OV1700950 Project Name: Big Horn Commerce Center, 11278 N. Oracle Road Private Grading Plans for Big Horn Commercial Center — 3rd Submittal Dear Ken, The Oro Valley Stormwater Utility has completed a substantive review of the Drainage Report, dated July 21, 2017; Final Site Plan, dated August 15, 2017; and Private Grading Plan, dated August 15, 2017. These three documents were received for review on September 5, 2017. This review was made in accordance with the Town of Oro Valley Drainage Criteria Manual, and applicable requirements of the IBC, Town of Oro Valley, Pima County, State of Arizona, and Federal codes, regulations, ordinances, and/or laws. Based on review of this submittal, the subject documents are CONDITIONALLY ACCEPTED and we have no substantive comments other than the one condition given below. 1. Conditional acceptance, and second request. Prior to Town acceptance of the Final Site Plan, provide a copy of the ADOT approval and R/W Permit. The ADOT approval shall include, at a minimum, approval for the future construction within the ADOT right-of-way of a new 42% diameter RCP identified by keynote #33 on Sheet 3 of 6 of the Final Site Plan. Technical accuracy and conformance to the current minimum design standards and requirements of the Town of Oro Valley, and other applicable standards, are the responsibility of the design engineer. If you have any questions, please call me at (520) 229-4818. Sincerely, Justin Turner, PE, CFM Senior Stormwater Engineer Justin Turner, P.E. Sr. Stormwater Civil Engineer Community Development & Public Works Town of Oro Valley JTurner@OroValleyAZ.gov CC: David Laws, Mike Todnem File: S:\PERMPLUS\D0CS\G1602254 Oro Valley, it's in our nature. 11000 N. La Canada Drive, Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 www.orovalleyaz.gov I phone: (520) 229-4800 1 fax: (520) 742-1022 k� F6u /-) (w q) Fidelity August 9, 2017 Property Address Seller: Buyer: National Title Agency, Inc. ISSUING OFFICE: 3410 E University Dr, #200, Phoenix, AZ 85034 )M0Pzt,V SEP Order No.: 51007306-051-51 3.26 Acres at SEC Ram's Field Pass Rd, Oracle Highway, Oro Valley, AZ We appreciate the opportunity of being of service to you. Please call us immediately if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, Fidelity National Title Agency, Inc. Escrow Contact: Pima Title Only (520)290-6227 Title Contact: Title No.: AZ-FCOP-IMP-N/A-1-17-51007306 APPLICATION FOR THE ISSUANCE OF CONDITION OF TITLE REPORT Applicant is in the process of investigating the Ownership of and defects, liens and encumbrances against an Interest in Land. As a component of that investigation, Applicant hereby requests the Company to furnish Applicant with a Report based upon the hereinafter defined Title Instruments, which Report will disclose the Ownership of and defects, liens and encumbrances against the hereinafter identified Interest in the hereinafter described Land. Applicant does not at this time need nor desire the benefit or protection afforded by a Policy of Title Insurance. The Report provided will be solely for the purpose of facilitating Applicant's investigation and for the sole use and benefit of Applicant and may not be used or relied upon by any other party. 1. The following terms when used in the Application and the Report shall mean: a. Applicant — The party or parties who have executed this Application and who are named in the Report. b. Company — The Title Insurance Company making the Report. C. Report — Condition of Title Report. d. Land — The real property described in the Application. e. Interest — The Estate in the Land described on the Application. f. Ownership — The Vesting of title to the Interest identified in the Application. g. Title Instruments: Documents recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of the County in which the land is located reviewed by the Company to facilitate the Company's issuance of title insurance policies excluding therefrom, however, any documents pertaining to (a) unpatented mining claims, (b) patents, (c) water rights, claims or title to water, (d) the lease, grant, exception or reservation of minerals or mineral rights. Documents, obtained by the Company to facilitate the issuance of title insurance policies, relating to the payment of Real Estate Taxes levied on the Interest in the Land excluding therefrom, however, any special assessments which are not collected by the Tax Collector for the County in which the Land is located. 2. The Land is described as follows: See Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3. The Interest in the Land is a: X a. Fee and Easement ❑ b. Leasehold created by ❑ C. Other Applicant specifically instructs the Company to set forth in the Report only the Ownership of and defects, liens and encumbrances against the Interest in the Land as disclosed by the Title Instruments. Applicant understands that during the course of preparing the Report, the Company may become aware of other matters pertaining to the Land or other Interests therein. Even if the company knows or would have reason to know Applicant may have an interest in these other matters, Applicant imposes no duty or responsibility on the Company to disclose those matters to Applicant either through the Report or otherwise. BY THE EXECUTION AND SUBMISSION OF THIS APPLICATION TO THE COMPANY, APPLICANT ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES: Condition of Title Report a. That the Company's sole obligation under the Report, and this Application, shall be to set forth the Ownership of and defects, liens and encumbrances against the Interest in the Land as disclosed by the Title Instruments. That the Company shall not be obligated under this Report to pay costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses incurred in any action, proceeding, or other claim brought against Applicant. C. That the Report is not an abstract of title, title opinion, preliminary report or commitment to issue title insurance. d. That the Company's liability under the Report for an error or omission is, as stated below, limited and that if Applicant desires that the Company assume additional liability, a Policy of Title Insurance, Binder, Commitment, or Guarantee should be requested. e. That Applicant shall have no right of action against the Company, whether or not based on negligence, except under the terms and provisions of, and subject to all limitations of this Application and the Report. f. That the Report is not valid and the Company shall have no liability thereunder unless this Application is attached thereto. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY APPLICANT RECOGNIZES THAT IT IS EXTREMELY DIFFICULT, IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE, TO DETERMINE THE EXTENT OF LOSS WHICH COULD ARISE FROM ERRORS OR OMISSIONS IN THE REPORT. APPLICANT RECOGNIZES THAT THE FEE CHARGED IS NOMINAL IN RELATION TO THE POTENTIAL LIABILITY WHICH COULD ARISE FROM SUCH ERRORS OR OMISSIONS. THEREFORE, APPLICANT UNDERSTANDS THAT THE COMPANY IS NOT WILLING TO PROCEED IN THE PREPARATION AND ISSUANCE OF THE REQUESTED REPORT UNLESS THE COMPANY'S LIABILITY IS STRICTLY LIMITED. APPLICANT AGREES WITH THE PROPRIETY OF THIS LIMITATION AND AGREES TO BE BOUND BY ITS TERMS. THIS LIMITATION IS AS FOLLOWS: APPLICANT AGREES, AS PART OF THE CONSIDERATION FOR THE ISSUANCE OF THIS REPORT, THAT THE COMPANY SHALL BE LIABLE TO APPLICANT UNDER THIS REPORT SOLELY BY REASON OF AN ERROR OR OMISSION BY THE COMPANY IN FAILING TO SET FORTH THE OWNERSHIP OF AND DEFECTS, LIENS AND ENCUMBRANCES AGAINST THE INTEREST IN THE LAND AS DISCLOSED BY THE TITLE INSTRUMENTS, WHICH ERROR OR OMISSION BY THE COMPANY HAS CAUSED LOSS TO THE APPLICANT; AND THEN THE LIABILITY SHALL BE A ONE-TIME PAYMENT TO APPLICANT OF FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($5,000.00). ACCORDINGLY, APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT THE REPORT BE ISSUED WITH THIS LIMITATION AS A PART OF THE CONSIDERATION THAT APPLICANT GIVES THE COMPANY TO PREPARE AND ISSUE THE REPORT. APPLICANT CERTIFIES THAT HE HAS READ AND UNDERSTOOD ALL OF THE TERMS, LIMITATIONS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS APPLICATION. EXECUTED THIS day of (This Application must be signed by the Applicant or an agent representing the Applicant.) APPLICANT: Print or Type Name Signature AGENT FOR APPLICANT Print or Type Name Signature Condition of Title Report MAILING ADDRESS: Telephone MAILING ADDRESS: Telephone "'=' Fidelity National Title Insurance Company Title No.: AZ-FCOP-IMP-N/A-1-17-51007306 CONDITION OF TITLE REPORT Fidelity National Title Insurance Company, a Florida Corporation, herein called the Company, SUBJECT TO THE TERMS, LIMITATIONS AND CONDITIONS OF THE APPLICATION FOR THIS CONDITION OF TITLE REPORT, WHICH APPLICATION, OR COPY THEREOF, IS ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF REPORTS To the party named in Schedule A, that as disclosed by the Title Instruments, the ownership of and the defects liens and encumbrances against the Interest in the Land are as shown in Schedule B. Any claim or other notice to the Company shall be in writing and shall be addressed to the Company at the issuing office or to: Fidelity National Title Insurance Company Claims Center PO Box 45023 Jacksonville, Florida, 32232-5023 Attn: Claims Administration THIS REPORT IS NOT VALID AND THE COMPANY SHALL HAVE NO LIABILITY HEREUNDER UNLESS THE APPLICATION REFERRED TO ABOVE, OR COPY THEREOF, IS ATTACHED HERETO. Countersigned by: Authorized Signature By SEAT. Randy Quirk, President Atest Wchae; Gr2velie. Secretary Condition of Title Report Page 1 Title No.: AZ-FLOP-IMP-N/A-1-17-51007306 Reference No.: 60018494 CONDITION OF TITLE REPORT SCHEDULE A Fee: $0.00 Date of Report: August 2, 2017 at 07:45 A.M. 1. Name of Party: Fidelity National Title Agency 2. The Interest referred to in the Application is: A FEE as to Parcels 1 and 2 and AN EASEMENT as to Parcel 3 3. The Land referred to in the Application is described as follows: See Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Issuing agent for Fidelity National Title Insurance Company ` C3) toot, Condition of Title Report Page 2 Title No.: AZ-FCOP-IMP-N/A-1-17-51007306 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF PIMA, STATE OF ARIZONA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: Parcel 1: That portion of Sections 5 and 8, Township 12 South , Range 14 East of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Pima County, Arizona, described as follows: COMMENCING at the Northwest corner of Section 8; Thence South 00104'09" West along the West line of said Section 8 as shown in Docket Book 7224, Page 1387 in the records of the Pima County Recorder, Pima County, Arizona, 640.50 feet to a point on the Easterly right-of-way of U.S. Highway 89; Thence North 54°26'54" East along said right-of-way line, 986.28 feet; Thence Northeasterly along a curve concave to the Northwest with a radiusf 3919.72 feet and a central angle of 06°31'36", an arc distance of 446.50 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; (!.'_107hence continue Northeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 06100'19", an arc distance of 410.84 feet; Thence South 48105'17" East, a distance of 325.00 feet; eI,- Thence South 48109'18" West, a distance of 445.32 feet; Let Thence North 41150' 42" West, a distance of 299.88 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. e' Parcel 2: That part of the vacated portion of the Tucson -Florence Highway (U.S. 89), as vacated by Resolution of Vacation of the Arizona Transportation Board of January 18, 1988, and recorded January 27, 1988, recorded in Docket 8211, Page 1500, being.a portion of the South half of the Southwest quarter of Section 5, Township 12 South, Range 14 East of the Gila and Salt River Meridian, Pima County, Arizona, which lies Southwesterly of the Northwesterly prolongation of the following described line: COMMENCING at the Northwest corner of Section 8 in said Township 12 South, Range 14 East; Thence South 00104'09" West, along the West line of said Section 8, 640.66 feet to a point on the Easterly right of way line of U.S. Highway 89; Thence North 54126'54" East, along said right of way line, 986.28 feet to a point of curve thereon; Thence Northeasterly along said right of way line, being a curve concave to the Northwest with a radius of 3919.72 feet and a central angle of 12131'55", an are distance of 857.34 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of said line; Thence South 48°05'17" East, 978.80 feet to the POINT OF ENDING of said line. Parcel 3: / An Easement for ingress and egress, as created in the instrument recorded in Docket 7224, Page 1387, over that portion of the Southwest quarter of Section 5 and the Northwest quarter of Section 8, Township 12 South, Range 14 East of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Pima County, Arizona, described as follows: Condition of Title Report �- Page 3 Title No.: AZ-FCOP-IMP-N/A-1-17-51007306 EXHIBIT A (Continued) COMMENCING at the Southwest corner of said Section 5; Thence South 89153'21" East along the South line of said Section 5, a tance of 890.09 feet to a point of intersection with a curve of radius 3919.72 feet, from said point a radial line bear North 37 1d'451 'West to the center, said curve being the Easterly right-of-way line of U.S. 89 Highway; C- 35QP"!;2' + 4c)�'Sl = 4uG,13 Thence NortheasterI 747A1 feet along the are of said right-of-way curve through a central angle of 10155'17" to the POINT OF BEGINNIN , Thence continue 60.00 feet along the are of said right-of-way curve through a central angle of 00152'37" to a point of intersection with a line; Thence South 48°05'32" East, a distance of 827.26 feet to a point on the North line of said Section 8; Thence continue South 48105'32" East, a distance of 136.82; Thence South 27'36'18" West, a distance of 61.92 feet to the most Easterly corner of Parcel No. 1; Thence North 48105'32" West 219.23 feet to a point on the South line of said Section 5; Thence continue North 48105'32" West a distance of 759.69 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. APN: 220-04-010P,010R,098E Condition of Title Report Page 4 Title No.: AZ-FCOP-IMP-N/A-1-17-51007306 CONDITION OF TITLE REPORT SCHEDULE B Fidelity National Title Insurance Company reports that Title Instruments, on the date hereof, disclose: Ownership of the Interest is in the name of: Bighorn Commerce Center, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company 2. The following defects, liens and encumbrances (which are not necessarily shown in their order of priority) against the Interest: Condition of Title Report Page 5 Title No.: AZ-FCOP-IMP-N/A-1-17-51007306 SCHEDULE B (Continued) A. Property taxes, which are a lien not yet due and payable, including any assessments collected with taxes to be levied for the year 2017. B. A covenant and agreement entitled "Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants Running With the Land" Executed by: The Garrett Corporation In favor of. Pima County Recording Date: December 06, 1984 Recording No: Docket 7424, Page 898 Which among other things provides: for covenants and conditions regarding zoning approval and development and a requirement that the approval of the Pima County Board of Supervisors must be obtained for any further subdividing of the land described therein. Reference is hereby made to said document for full particulars. C. The rights of Pima County, a body politic, and any successor incorporated town or municipality, for a roadway over Parcel 2, pursuant to former A.R.S. 28-1902. The easements for State Highway were abandoned by the State of Arizona by the Resolution of Vacation dated January 18,1988 Recording Date: January 27, 1988 Recording No: Docket 8211, Page 1500 D Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document: IyS�S Onf (�t�urpo ingress, egress and utilities ��- Record�!fi g Date: June 06, 2001 �� Recording No: Docket11564,Page38979T,��Us`'�_aT Fcfz Ft�(►xzaul,-:�t1�t� �u Affects the Southeasterly 40 feet of Parcel 1 W45444' 1S:Ida44JP- ) it Covenants, conditions, restrictions and easements but omitting any covenants or restrictions, if any, " including but not limited to those based upon race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, familial status, - marital status, disability, handicap, national origin, ancestry, source of income, gender, gender identity, gender expression, medical condition or genetic information, as set forth in applicable state or federal laws, except to the extent that said covenant or restriction is permitted by applicable law, as set forth in the document Recording Date: September 03, 2002 Recording No: Docket 11876, Page 1272 F. Matters contained in that certain document Entitled: Amended and Restated Declaration of Easement, Maintenance and Development Agreement Recording Date: September 03, 2002 Recording No: Docket 11876, Page 1286 Reference is hereby made to said document for full particulars. Condition of Title Report Page 6 Title No.: AZ-FCOP-IMP-N/A-1-17-51007306 SCHEDULE B (Continued) G. Any action that may be taken by the Arizona Department of Transportation to acquire right of way and access for State Highway, as disclosed by Resolution of Establishment Recording Date: June 03, 2005 Recording No: Docket 12566, Page 581; Amended Resolution Recording Date: March 15, 2006 Recording No: Docket 12761, Page 242; and Resolution Recording Date: November 07, 2007 Recording No: Docket 13177, Page 228 H. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document: Purpose: Recording Date Recording No: utilities April 18, 2007 'Docket 13036, Page 272` Matters contained in that certain document Entitled: Traffic Light Development and Contribution Agreement Recording Date: June 27, 2013 Recording No: 2013-1780057 Reference is hereby made to said document for full particulars. Matters shown on record of survey: Recording No: Book 62 of Surveys, Page 51 Tax Note: Year: 2016 Tax Parcel No: 220-04-01 OP, 220-04-01OR and 220-04-098E (See Tax Sheets attached.) 3. The following matters are disclosed by name only and the Company, without additional information, is unable to determine whether any or all of these matters are defects, liens or encumbrances against the Interest: Note: This Condition of Title Report does not address General Index matters (such as proceedings, liens, or decrees), which do not specifically describe said Land. Condition of Title Report Page 7 F. ANN RODRIGUEZ, RECORDER RECORDED BY: RJL DEPUTY RECORDER 9544 PE2 TFNTI FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE 2390 E CAMELEACK RD STE 210 PHOENIX AZ 85016 rnoenix, Anzona 62)U10 File No. 125297 Exempt per ARS 11-1134 (A) (4) QUITCLAIM DEED DOCKET: 12458 PAGE: 1772 NO. OF PAGES: 2 SEQUENCE: 20042500365 12/29/2004 QCDEED 13:51 PICKUP AMOUNT PAID $ 9.00 For the consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00), and other valuable consideration, LA RESERVE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, an Arizona non-profit corporation, hereby quitclaims to BIGHORN COMMERCE CENTER, L.L.C., all right, title, or interest in and to the following described real property located in Pima County, Arizona: That portion of Common Area A lying Southwesterly of the public street dedicated as Rams Field Pass, Rams Canyon, Book 48 of Maps and Plats, page 87, records of Pima County, Arizona, and lying Northwesterly of the following described line: COMMENCING at the Northwest comer of Section 8; Thence South 01 04' 09" West along the West line of said Section 8 as shown in Docket Book 7224 at Page 1387 in the records of the Pima County Recorder, Pima County, Arizona, 640.50 feet to a point on the Easterly right-of-way of State Route 77; Thence North 54' 26' 54" East along said right-of-way line, 986.28 feet; Thence Northeasterly along a curve concave to the Northwest with a radius of 3,919.72 feet and a central angle of 0613 V 36",,an are distance of 446.50 feet; Thence continuing Northeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 06100' 19", an arc distance of 410.84 feet; Thence South 480 05' 17" East, a distance of 325.00 feet to the Point of Beginning (Said point also being the Northwesterly comer of the property conveyed to Fidelity National Title Agency, Inc., an Arizona corporation as trustee under Trust No. 60,148, in that certain Warranty Deed recorded on July 8, 2004 in Docket 12339, Page 6423, records of Pima County, Arizona. Said point also being the Easterly comer of the property conveyed to Big Hom Commerce Center LLC in that certain Warranty Deed recorded in Docket 10973, Page 673, records of Pima County, Arizona.); Thence North 48" 09' 54" East, through Common Area A and terminating at the Southwesterly right-of-way of Rams Field Pass. 2 5 8 0 7 7 2 7i— Warranty Deed Page 2 Exempt per ARS 11-1134 (A)) (4) DATED this% 9 day of /"//ay' , 2004. LA RE OMMUNITY ASSOCIA ON By. Its: STATE OF ARIZONA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF PIMA ) Acknowledged before me this P day of , 2004, by of LA RESERVE COMMUNITY (Name & Title) ASSOCIATION. #WW--WAASKf! n. ;'1_ sz l 7/SJ4AP:•' t 1 2 4 5 8 0 1 7 7 3 F. ANN RODRIGUEZ, RECORDER RECORDED BY: RJL DEPUTY RECORDER 9544 PE2 TFNTI FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE 2390 E CAMELBACK RD STE 210 PHOENIX AZ 85016 1 11vv111A, r-kd- U./ V AV File No. 125297 / 10003803 DOCKET: 12458 PAGE: 1774 NO. OF PAGES: 3 SEQUENCE: 20042500366 12/29/2004 QCDEED 13:51 MAIL AMOUNT PAID $ 10.00 QUITCLAIM DEED For the consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00), and other valuable consideration, LA RESERVE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, an Arizona non-profit corporation, hereby quitclaims to FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE AGENCY, INC., an Arizona corporation, as trustee under Trust No. 60,148, and not in its corporate capacity, pursuant to ARS 33-404 a Declaration of Trust and Affidavit recorded on July 8, 2004 in Docket 12339 at page 6422 in the records of the Pima County Recorder, all right, title, or interest in and to the following described real property located in Pima County, Arizona: That portion of Common Area A lying Southwesterly of the public street dedicated as Rams Field Pass, Rams Canyon, Book 48 of Maps and Plats, page 87, records of Pima County, Arizona, and lying Southeasterly of the following described line: COMMENCING at the Northwest comer of Section 8; Thence South 0° 04' 09" West along the West line of said Section 8 as shown in Docket Book 7224 at Page 1387 in the records of the Pima County Recorder, Pima County, Arizona, 640.50 feet to a point on the Easterly right-of-way of State Route 77; Thence North 54' 26' 54" East along said right-of-way line, 986.28 feet; Thence Northeasterly along a curve concave to the Northwest with a radius of 3,919.72 feet and a central angle of 06' 3l' 36", an arc distance of 446.50 feet; Thence continuing Northeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 06' 00' 19", an are distance of 410.84 feet; Thence South 48' 05' 17" East, a distance of 325.00 feet to the Point of Beginning(Said 2 point also being the Northwesterly corner of the property conveyed to FidelityNational Title 4 Agency, Inc., an Arizona corporation as trustee under Trust No. 60,148, in that certain 8 Warranty Deed recorded on July 8, 2004 in Docket 12339, Page 6423, records of Pima 0 County, Arizona. Said point also being the Easterly comer of the property conveyed to Big 1 Horn Commerce Center LLC in that certain Warranty Deed recorded in Docket 10973, Page 7 7 673, records of Pima County, Arizona.); 4 Thence North 48" 09' 54" East, through Common Area A and terminating at the Southwesterly right-of-way of Rams Field Pass. is Warranty Deed Page 2 Exempt per ARS 11-1134 (A) (4) DATED this day of 41/ 2004. LA IN STATE OF ARIZONA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF PIMA ) Its: Acknowledged before me this 1 R day of (Name & Title) ASSOCIATION. Notary Public v My commissio expires: 2004, by of LA RESERVE COMMUNITY ION 1 2 4 5 s� r 7 5 F. AM RODRIGUEZ, RECORDER RECORDED BY: MbM DEPUTY RECORDER 2403 R045 TFNTI FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE 7750 E BROADWAY STE #A200 TUCSON AZ 85710 DOCKET: PAGE: 11564 3907 NO. OF PAGES: 8 SEQUENCE: 20011091144 ��7 OAF AG 06/06/2001 17:30 PICKUP AMOUNT PAID - $-__--12.00 _ tic � I KA DECLARATION OF EASEMENTS, MAINTENANCE AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT �y v �c►h �o2.J,CgSS�j 4 -i 9 Page 1 of 8 12/27/2017 4:14 PM DECLARATION OF EASEMENTS, MAINTENANCE AND DEVELOPMENT AGRMMNT THIS DECLARATION OF BASEMENTS, MAM7ENANCE AMID DEVELOPMENT AGREEMMq'f (the "Declaration°') is made effective day of June, 2001 (the `Effective Date"), by Kit T. Donley and Paula J_ Donley, as Husband and 'Of k and Big Horn Commerce L-L.C., an Arizona Limited Liability Company with Todd Otis, an unmarried aver►; and Robert J_ and Amy L. Solfisburg as its members. RECIt'>i'AL.S A Kit T. and Paula J. Donley, as Husband and Wde, owners of certain real property situated in Pima County, Arizona which is legally described as -Exhibit X' and designated hereafter as ("Parcel A'°) B. Dig Hare. Commerce, L-L.C. , an Arizona. Limited Liability Corporation, nu=bers Todd Otis, an unmarried mare, 50% interests and Robert J_ and Amy L. SolSsburg, Soy/Q interest; owners of certain veal property situated in Pima County, Arizona which is legally described as "Exhibit Y" and designated hereafter as C'Parcd B") C. The owner of Parcel A (the "Parcel A Owner") and the owner o0ared B (the -Parcel 13 Owner"), collectively, ("The Parcel Owners") wish to establish certain easements and to set forth the rights and obligations of The Parcel Owners with respect to common improvements for the benefit of the Parcels, including, without FaWtation, pavin& curbs, walls and utilities_ AGREEMENT NOW, TBEREFORE, in order to effectuate the purposes as her&=bove and hereinafter set forth, The Parcel Owners declam and establish the following agreements and easements which will run with the land for the benefit of each of The Parcel Owners, their successors and assigns. 1. Odle Road Access_F.ase . The Parcel Owners hereby grant and convey a 50 foot non-exclusive easement for purpose of bagness and egress of motor vehicle, pedestrian and utilities including the construction, inefal On, uses aWutenance,, and replacan=t of said improvements_ The exact location of said easement ("Easement Location") to be shared equally is the North 25 feet ofParcel A and the South 25 Feet of Parcel B as shown on Exhibit "Z" attached. - a Parties acknowledge, the =act taereatt location is subject to final approval h om 1 Arizona Department of Transportation. c 2. Ram Field Pass A The Parcel B owner hereby grants to the E Parcel A owner a nott-exclusive easement for purpose of ingress and egress of motor vehicle, pedestrian and utilities to Rams Field Pass to be located along . the east 40 feet of Pared B as shown on Fxhi'bit `°Z" attached_ The Parcel B Owner expressly reserves the right, power and privilege to pave, landscape and use R the easement, and to grant rights within the easement to others, for such purposes Page 2 of 8 12127/2017 4:14 PM it deems appropriate, necessary or Convenient in connection with the improvement or development of Parcel B so as that the same does not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of the easements granted above. 3. Contra6ons_-by Panjes. The Parcel Owners shall contribute equally towards the costs and expenses of installation and maintenance for paving, curbing, unties and landscaping in connection with any improvements of the easements. 4. Term_ The term of the easements granted hereby shall be of perpetual duration provided, however, that in the event any of the property benefited thereby, is transfetred or conveyed to Pima County and/or other governmental agencies, then the easements granted hereby shall immediately and automatically terminate without any act or action required by either party or their successor or assigns_ The Parcel Owners will work cooperatively in the development of the parcels and share costs in a reasonable n wi uer for avy other development components that the Parcel owners determine mutuaAy beneficial to the properties. 6. The parcel owner that constructs the above improvers (the "Conammng Parcel Owner") will invoice the other panel owner (" Non -Constructing Parcel Owner") for its share ofthe costs of said improvements (said invoices shall be supported by lien waivers, invoices, receipts, statements and the Ir`ke). x'he Non. constructing Parcel Owner shall reimburse the Constructing Parcel Owner for its share of the cons within 14 days following receipt of said invoice. 7. it is expressly provided that in the: event any parcel owner fails to make any reimbursement as required herein, in addition to other rerruedics, the parcel owner incurring such costs shall be entitled to record in the official records ofPrma County, Arizona, a lien for the amount due against the defaulting Owner's Parcel_ In the event of default, the unpaid balance shall accrue at 12% per aamum. until the remaining balance is paid in full. The defaulting owner promises to pay all costs of collection including, without limitation reasonable attorneys fees and expenses, whether or not suit is filed. $_ IdMiMtMand Covenants. (a) In no event shaft the easements granted herein be used for parking 3 of motor vehicles- (b) The Panel Owners will obtain general habrility m umice for A easement areas in amounts demermined to be reasonable, provided - that both Parcel Owners are v arced as insured under such policies. z (c) The Parcel Owners may not use any portion of the easements crested herein to benefit any pared of real property other than the Page 3 of 8 12/27/2017 4:14 PM developable laud contained in owners parcel not increase the use of the easement area 9. The terms and provisions hereof may be released in whole or in part, or modified, or amended, but only by Wstrment in writing by all Parties and recorded in the official records ofPima County, Arizona l o. All agreements and obligations conu6ed herein shall be binding upon and insure to the benefit of The Parcel Owners, their weressors and assigns, heirs and personal representatives. All provisions of this instrumerny including the benefits and burdens, shalt run with the land. 11. The Parcel Owners are entering into this easement agreement only for the grard and establishmern of uses and sharing of the costs and expenses in connection with the easement area as provided and no Partnersbip, Joint venture or other entity or relation is intended to be created by exoceition of this agrMnalL 12_ T'vne is of the essence with respect w the performance of each of the obligations and agreements in this document. 13. This document shall be recorded and shall thereupon constitute notice of the contents hereof to any person acquiring any interest in any of the Paro s_ IN W1(' gESS WHEREOF, this Declaration has been awmAed the day and year first written above. BIG HORN COhMERCE L.L.C. By By KfT HBO'"y B%r I PAULA-4. DONLEY ELy.w 1 Page 4 of 8 12/27/2017 4:14 PM 05/30/2001 19:26 797-2541 P12n LAND PAGE 03 lent 99-149 EXHIBIT % LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL6A1 That portion of Sections 5 and 8, Township 12 South, Range 14 East, Gila and Sah River Base and Meridian, Pima County, Arizona described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of Section 8; ( `fib-mr1 MI Thence South 0° 04' 09" West along the West tine of said Section 8 as shown in Docket Book 7224 at Page 1387 in the records of the Pima County Recorder, Pima Cotrrtty, ,Arizona, 640.50 feet to a point on the Easterly right-of-way of U.S. Highway 89;YT Thence North 54' 26' 54" East along said right-of-way line, 986.28 feet to the Point of IaoT t�J�/art� t t ``,, ---- Oh SIR Beginning; (. 11",) S FqF,/► Thence Northeasterly along a curve concave to the Northwest with a radius of 3919.72 feet and a central angle of6' 31' 36", an arc distance of446.50 feet; 1.YU Y oriJ on -�j}{-6. (T �'j Thence South 41 ° 50' 42' East 299.88 Feet; Thence South 48° 09' 18" West 414.09 feet; Thence North 47124' 56" West 325.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. Parcel contains 131,901 square feet, 3.028 acres. Together with and subject to a 40' ingress, egress and utility easement described in Exhibit B. 1 t11� a ttlltl[ni �1 � thotem Page 5 of 8 12/27/2017 4:14 PM 05/90/2001 19:26 797-2541 PRO LAND PAGE 04 I Jab! 99-109 Exhibit B LEGAL DESCRIPTION 40' Ingress, Egress and Utility Easement A 40' ingress, egress and utility easement located over a portion of Sections 5 and 8, Township 12 South, Range 14 East, GUa and Salt River Base and Meridian, Pima County, Arizona, said easement being 20 feet on either side of the following described centerline_ Commencing at the Northwest comer of Section 8; Thence South 0° 04' 09" West along the West line of said Section 8 as shown in Docket Book 7224 at Page 1387 in the records of the Pima County Recorder, Pima County, Arizona, 640.50 feet to a point on the Easterly right-of-way of U.S. Highway 89; Thence North 54' 26' 54" East along said right-of-way line 986.28 feet; Thence South 47° 24' 56" East 304.91 feet; Thence North 48' 09' 18" East 416.04 feet to the True Point of Beginning of said centerline; Thence continue North 48' 09' 18" East 443.13 feet to the Terminus of said centerline. so 91 >asrQ9 Page 6 of 8 12/2712017 4:14 PM 06/05/2001 09:39 797-2541 PRO LAND PAGE 01/01 Jot# 99-109 1 MIBIT Y LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL 6B1 That portion of Sections 5 and 8, Township 12 South, Rage 14 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Puna County, Arizona described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest comer of Section 8; Thence South 0' 04' 09" West along the West line of said Section 8 as shown in Docket Book 7224 at Page 1387 in the records of the Pima County Recorder, Pima Coilrlty, Arizona, 640-50 feet to a point on the Easterly right-of-way of U.S. Mghway 89; Thence North. 54' 26' 54" East along said right-of-way lice, 986.28 feet; The= Northeasterly along a curve concave to the Northwest with a radius of 3919.72 feet and a central angle of 6° 31' 36", an are distance - of 446.50 feet to the Point of Beginning' Thence conit= Northeasterly along said curve having a radius of 3919.72 feet and a central angle of 6° 00' 19", an arc distance of 410.84 feet; Thence South 48' 05' 17' East 325.00 feet; Thence South 48° 09' 18" West 445.32 feet; Thence North 41' 50' 42" West 299.88 feet to the Point of Beginning. Parcel contains I31,934 square feet, 3.029 acres. Together with and subject to a 40' ingress, egress and utility easement descn-bed in Exhibit B. 1 F inn► oMUIL � q�l Page 7 of 8 12/27/2017 4:14 PM Ao 3 ' m i N 48'09'18' E 1^_ 1w Q 1NGRESSlEGRESS & PUBLIC i `{ SEWER & UTILITY EASEMENTS-" ASEMENTS 4 1 9 E PARCEL B PARCEL A 50• ni y o (131,934 square feet, 3.029 acres) (131,901 square feet, 3.028 acres n 25` 25 t 1 ORACLE ROAD 9 1 N ` '� JabA LF�eiAwd.iv -------------------------------------------- rq j//./" 9feavae�s.�ea�m. � «�se� (sm) rev Ursa Miller, Marvin From: Simms, Milini Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2017 8:46 AM To: Ken Perry; 'John Hucko' Cc: Miller, Marvin Subject: RE: Big Horn Commerce Final Site Plan (OV1700950) Great, we look forward to meeting with you. Our Current Planning, Principle Planner may join us as well. Again, our intention is to get you through the process efficiently as well. Thank you, Milini Simms From: Ken Perry [mailto:kperry@perryengineering.net] Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2017 8:34 AM To: Simms, Milini <msimms@orovalleyaz.gov>; 'John Hucko' < Cc: mmiller@orovalleyaz.govn Subject: RE: Big Horn Commerce Final Site Plan (OV1700950) Yes, that will work for me. Thanks From: Simms, Milini [mailto:msimms@orovalleyaz.govl Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2017 8:23 AM To: John Hucko Cc: mmillerCaborovalleyaz.govn; 'Ken Perry' Subject: RE: Big Horn Commerce Final Site Plan (OV1700950) Hi John, Are you and Ken able to meet with us on Wednesday (10/18) at 2 PM? Thank you, Milini Simms From: John Hucko [mailto: Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 2:36 PM To: Simms, Milini <msimms@orovalleyaz.gov> Cc: mmiller@orovalleyaz.govn; 'Ken Perry' <kperry@perryengineering.net> Subject: Big Horn Commerce Final Site Plan (OV1700950) Milini, are you able to schedule a meeting with Marvin next Wednesday (10/18) afternoon sometime so Ken and myself can discuss the project comments? Thanks john John Hucko, Landscape Architect Tucson, AZ 85750 Miller, Marvin From: Turner, Justin Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 8:22 AM To: Ken Perry; 'Carl Larson' Cc: Laws, David; Todnem, Mike; Miller, Marvin Subject: RE: OV1700950, G16002254, Big Horn Commerce Center, request for SWPPP revisions Ken, The 2016 SWPPP is out of date because, for starters, it was for an earlier version of the site plan. Please call me and we can discuss it in more detail. Justin. Justin Turner, PE, CFM Senior Stormwater Engineer Community Development & Public Works Town of Oro Valley 11000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley, AZ 85737 520-229-4818 (Office) From: Ken Perry [mailto:kperry@perryengineering.net] Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 3:48 PM To: Turner, Justin <jturner@orovalleyaz.gov>; 'Carl Larson' <clarson@perryengineering.net> Cc: Laws, David <dlaws@orovalleyaz.gov>; Todnem, Mike <mtodnem@orovalleyaz.gov>; Miller, Marvin <mmiller@orovalleyaz.gov> Subject: RE: OV1700950, G16002254, Big Horn Commerce Center, request for SWPPP revisions Hello Justin, Is there a problem just leaving the date as is? I don't think the SWPPPs go out of date do they? Ken From: Turner, Justin[mailto:jturner(-Oorovalleyaz.gov] Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 2:54 PM To: Carl Larson Cc: Ken Perry; Laws, David; Todnem, Mike; Miller, Marvin Subject: OV1700950, G16002254, Big Horn Commerce Center, request for SWPPP revisions Hello Carl. Would you please call me regarding the SWPPP. The SWPPP report we have on file is dated July 15, 2016, and it now appears out of date. I look forward to hearing from you. Justin Turner, PE, CFM Senior Stormwater Engineer Community Development & Public Works Town of Oro Valley 11000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley, AZ 85737 520-229-4818 (Office) From: Carl Larson[mailto:clarson@perrvengineering.net] Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 2:41 PM To: Turner, Justin <Iturner@orovalleyaz.gov> Cc: kperry@Perryengineering.net Subject: Big Horn RAS files Justin, Try this, and let me know whether or not this works for you. I was having trouble opening the models from the zip folder from here. If it doesn't work, I'll get help. All 3 models are actually within the same .prj file. Carl PER1M-1' ENGINEERING bV�1� 4�',�7crl'yell�llit:�:rinc.11et f carI T..,arson PE. CFM 505 W. Weunore Road l'ucson, .Arizona 85705 Office 520.620.98 70, ext CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This E-mad and any attachments are private and are intended only for the use of the addressee, and may contain privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the interded recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, distribution, or copying of this E-mail and/or the attachments is strictly prohibited. Miller, Marvin From: Ken Perry <kperry@perryengineering.net> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 3:48 PM To: Turner, Justin; 'Carl Larson' Cc: Laws, David; Todnem, Mike; Miller, Marvin Subject: RE: OV1700950, G16002254, Big Horn Commerce Center, request for SWPPP revisions Hello Justin, Is there a problem just leaving the date as is? I don't think the SWPPPs go out of date do they? Ken From: Turner, Justin [mailto:jturner@orovalleyaz.gov] Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 2:54 PM To: Carl Larson Cc: Ken Perry; Laws, David; Todnem, Mike; Miller, Marvin Subject: OV1700950, G16002254, Big Horn Commerce Center, request for SWPPP revisions Hello Carl. Would you please call me regarding the SWPPP. The SWPPP report we have on file is dated July 15, 2016, and it now appears out of date. I look forward to hearing from you. Justin Turner, PE, CFM Senior Stormwater Engineer Community Development & Public Works Town of Oro Valley 11000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley, AZ 85737 520-229-4818 (Office) From: Carl Larson[mailto:clarson@perryengineering.net l Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 2:41 PM To: Turner, Justin <iturner@orovalleyaz.gov> Cc: kperry@perrvengineering.net Subject: Big Horn RAS files Justin, Try this, and let me know whether or not this works for you. I was having trouble opening the models from the zip folder from here. If it doesn't work, I'll get help. All 3 models are actually within the same .prj file. Carl PERRY ENGINEER5I _G F11 I I i Carl T. Larson PE, CFM 505 W. Wetmore Road Tucson. Arizona 85705 Office 520,620.9870, ext. 3 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This E-mail and any attachments are private and are intended only for the use Of the addressee. and may contain privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, distribution, or copying of this E-mail and/or the -attachments is strictly prohibited, a" N ` Miller, Marvin Frorn: Turner, Justin Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 2:54 PM To: Carl Larson Cc: Ken Perry; Laws, David; Todnem, Mike; Miller, Marvin Subject: OV1700950, G16002254, Big Horn Commerce Center, request for SWPPP revisions Hello Carl. Would you please call me regarding the SWPPP. The SWPPP report we have on file is dated July 15, 2016, and it now appears out of date. I look forward to hearing from you. Justin Turner, PE, CFM Senior Stormwater Engineer Community Development & Public Works Town of Oro Valley 11000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley, AZ 85737 520-229-4818 (Office) From: Carl Larson (mailto:clarson@perryengineering.net] Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 2:41 PM To: Turner, Justin <jturner@orovalleyaz.gov> Cc: kperry@perryengineering.net Subject: Big Horn RAS files Justin, Try this, and let me know whether or not this works for you. I was having trouble opening the models from the zip folder from here. If it doesn't work, I'll get help. All 3 models are actually within the same .prj file. Carl ENGINEERIRG ._I.perrvengineerlm).n l Gars 1. Larson PE. CFNI 505 W. Wetmore Road Tucson, Arizona 85705 Of tce 520.620.9870, ext. 3 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This E-mail and any attachments are private and are intended only for the use of the addressee. arnd may contain privileged and/or confidential information. if you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, distribution, or copying of this E-mail and/or the attachments is strictly prohibited. f Town of Oro Valley Community Development and Public Works October 10, 2017 Kenneth Perry, PE Perry Engineering, LLC 505 West Wetmore Road, Tucson, AZ 85705 Plan Check No.: OV12-05-23, G1602254, and OV1700950 Project Name: Big Horn Commerce Center, 11278 N. Oracle Road Private Grading Plans for Big Horn Commercial Center — 3rd Submittal Dear Ken, The Oro Valley Stormwater Utility has completed a substantive review of the Drainage Report, dated July 21, 2017; Final Site Plan, dated August 15, 2017; and Private Grading Plan, dated August 15, 2017. These three documents were received for review on September 5, 2017. This review was made in accordance with the Town of Oro Valley Drainage Criteria Manual, and applicable requirements of the IBC, Town of Oro Valley, Pima County, State of Arizona, and Federal codes, regulations, ordinances, and/or laws. Based on review of this submittal, the subject documents are CONDITIONALLY ACCEPTED and we have no substantive comments other than the one condition given below. 1. Conditional acceptance, and second request. Prior to Town acceptance of the Final Site Plan, provide a copy of the ADOT approval and R/W Permit. The ADOT approval shall include, at a minimum, approval for the future construction within the ADOT right-of-way of a new 42"- diameter RCP identified by keynote #33 on Sheet 3 of 6 of the Final Site Plan. Technical accuracy and conformance to the current minimum design standards and requirements of the Town of Oro Valley, and other applicable standards, are the responsibility of the design engineer. If you have any questions, please call me at (520) 229-4818. Sincerely, Justin Turner, PE, CFM Senior Stormwater Engineer Justin Turner, P.E. Sr. Stormwater Civil Engineer Community Development & Public Works Town of Oro Valley JTurner@OroVallevAZ.gov CC: David Laws, Mike Todnem File: S:\PERMPLUS\DOCS\G1602254 Oro Valley, it's in our nature. 11000 N. La Canada Drive, Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 www.orovalleyaz.gov I phone: (520) 229-4800 1 fax: (520) 742-1022 J Miller, Marvin From: Turner, Justin Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 12:05 PM To: Miller, Marvin Cc: Todnem, Mike; Laws, David Subject: G1602254: Drainage Report, Final Site Plan, Private Grading Plans for Big Horn Commercial Center, Stormwater conditional acceptance) Attachments: stormwtr-dr-03-20171010acceptance.pdf Marvin, Here is our conditional acceptance. Please do not accept the Final Site Plan until after we received ADOT approval to construct a new 43" diameter RCP within their right-of-way. Justin Justin Turner, PE, CFM Senior Stormwater Engineer Community Development & Public Works Town of Oro Valley 11000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley, AZ 85737 520-229-4818 (Office) Miller, Marvin From: Simms, Milini Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 8:50 AM To: Ken Perry Cc: John Hucko; Miller, Marvin Subject: RE: Big Horn Commerce Final Site Plan (OV1700950) Attachments: 2nd Review Planning.pdf Hi Ken, Marvin and myself are not both available on Thursday or Friday. Are you available Monday afternoon? This way all four of us can meet. John also received Engineering's comments yesterday (and Planning's are attached to this email) so this may provide more time to review and address them, prior to our meeting. If you would like to meet with me on Thursday to discuss the Final Site Plan and set-up a second meeting on Monday to discuss the Final Landscape, NPPP, and RWHP with all four of us, that works as well. I think meeting on all plans prior to resubmission will help immensely. Let me know what works best for you. Thank you, Milini Simms Planner 520.229.4836 From: Ken Perry [mailto:kperry@perryengineering.net] Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 8:38 AM To: Simms, Milini <msimms@orovalleyaz.gov> Cc: John Hucko <jhucko789@comcast.net> Subject: RE: Big Horn Commerce Final Site Plan (OV1700950) Hello Milini, Would you have time on Thursday to meet with John and I? I am available all day on Thursday. Thanks, Ken From: Simms, Milini[maiIto: msimms(a)orovaIleyaz.govl Sent: Monday, October 09, 2017 3:52 PM To: Ken Perry Subject: RE: Big Horn Commerce Final Site Plan (OV1700950) Good afternoon, Understood. Our goal is to get you through the review process as efficiently as possible as well. I just spoke with our Engineer on this project and it seems as though his comments for the Landscape Plan and Rainwater Harvesting Plan were not addressed either. The comments were resent to John Hucko this afternoon. �� (►mot �3C u�j' - �-.av Rtc. - 3 =vo (�.t� Perhaps it would be best if the four of us met prior to resubmitting the Final Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Rainwater Harvesting Plan to go through the revisions and our comments so only one more submittal is required prior to approval. Let me know if you and John are available and will be ready to meet. Thank you, Milini Simms Planner 520.229.4836 From: Ken Perry [mailto:kperry@perryengineering.net) Sent: Monday, October 09, 2017 1:29 PM To: Simms, Milini <msimms@orovalleyaz.gov> Subject: RE: Big Horn Commerce Final Site Plan (OV1700950) Milini, I am unsure how these comments slipped through the cracks over here. Is there some sort of an over the counter review with you? What we need to do is get going on the grading plan, and I believe we have conditional approval on that from engineering. The improvements on the Final Site Plan will probably never be developed as they are shown since it will depend on what the new owners want to do once the property is sold. If I revise the plans per your comments in the next week or so, can I come by and go over them with you? Thanks, Ken From: Simms, Milini [mailto:msimms@orovalleyaz.gov] Sent: Friday, October 06, 2017 5:00 PM To: Ken Perry Subject: Big Horn Commerce Final Site Plan (OV1700950) Dear Mr. Perry, Thank you for resubmitting the aforementioned plans for Big Horn Commerce Center. We look forward to continuing to work with you through the review and approval process. Based on your submittal, staff offers the attached comments to be addressed in a revised application. Engineering comments will be sent separately. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. Best regards, Milini Simms Planner 520.229.4836 O�OyPi�EY g,71,>0 F�LNDEO 19�a Development and Infrastructure Services September 28, 2017 Kenneth D. Perry, P.E. Perry Engineering 505 W. Wetmore Rd. Tucson, AZ 85705 RE: G1602254, Private Grading Plan For Big Horn Commercial Center; 3rd Submittal Dear Kenneth, The Town of Oro Valley Engineering Review Permitting Division has completed the third review of the Private Grading Plan for Big Horn Commercial Center. The proposed private grading improvements are deemed "conditionally -approved" with the following additional comments. o A Right -Of -Way Use Permit will be required for the authorization to install Civil Improvements (e.g., rip -rapped slope, 5' wide sidewalk, and eight (8) sectional sidewalk scupper) within the Rams Field Pass Road Public Right -Of -Way. o The Title Report references a 40' easement on the southeastern side of the parcel boundary line, but does not reference a 50' easement as shown on the northwestern parcel boundary line. Please clarify. o This Grading Plan (Sheet 3/5) shows a single parcel whereas the Pima County Map Guide shows three (3) parcels within the shown parcel boundary lines. These parcels are 220-04-010P, 220-04-098E, and 220-04-098H. Please clarify if Parcels 220-04-010P and 220-04-098E have been combined. Also, clarify the existence of Parcel 220-04-098H, a Common Area Open Space. o Easement INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT DKT 7224, PG 1387 is shown within the plan set sheet overlaying Rams Field Pass RD (Public Roadway). This easement is not shown within Pima County's Recorders Office Website. Please clarify if this should be shown. o Please be aware that a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be required for submittal to the Town of Oro Valley before a Grading Permit will be issued. Additionally, The Final Site Plan and Drainage Report will need to be approved before this Grading Permit is approved. Review of these construction documents is in accordance with the 2012 International Building Code (IBC), Section 106. The following comments are to verify conformance with all applicable requirements of the IBC, Town of Oro Valley, Pima County, State of Arizona, and Federal codes, regulations, ordinances, and/or laws: You may contact me at (520) 229-4823 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Marvin Miller Engineering Design Reviewer Attachment: Private Grading Plan (31d) Submittal w/ this Conditionally -Approved Letter 13 FATTISON September 2, 2016 ENGINEERING., LLC Project No. 16-104 a, t=rAlteellide ti rilgiluvritr ^ Volsstrumoyt hshlli�kirt t iit a ail 'l a aties Bighorn Commerce Center LLC 1980 E. Palisades Road Oro Valley, AZ 85737 D ENGINEERING SERVICES S FP ° D Big Horn Commerce .; �OJ� Oracle Road and Rams Field Pass Oro Valley, Arizona As requested by Perry Engineering, we are providing this update letter regarding our Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Project Number 99-159, dated April 28, 1999. We understand that the planned development is substantially similar to that described in our report, thus, our conclusions and original recommendations in the geotechnical evaluation remain valid. In addition, this letter provides infiltration test results for the proposed basins. The tests were 12-inch- diameter and run with about 1 foot of head. The test results are provided in the following table. a�,� !nJ M 3'� Test No. Depth, ft Stabilized Rate, min./in. 1-1 4 5 i-2 4 3 The rates measured at the time of infiltration testing are based on soil conditions at the depth and locations indicated. The actual rates of constructed detention/retention basins may vary significantly because of the following factors: location and depth of basin compared to the infiltration tests conducted at the time of field exploration; type of cover in detention/retention basin bottom (grass, rock, etc.); degree of compaction of the detention/retention basin bottom; placement of fill in the detention/retention basin; and the amount and type of sediment deposited in the basin during storm events. The results do not include any factors of safety or de -rating factors. The designer should apply an appropriate factor in determining sizing requirements. 1129 N. Win stel Blvd. « Tucson, AZ 85716 Phone: 520.881.1234 • Fax. 520.881.4919 Project No. 16-104 Page 2 Thank you for selecting PATTISON ENGINEERrNG, L.L.C. We look forward to being a member of your team on the remainder of this project. If you have any questions about this letter, or require additional consultation, please call us. Sincerely, PATTISON ENGINEERING, L.L.C. `ion, and Materials Testing Services Francisco J. Jacinto, P.E. Managing Principal Copies: Addressee (1) email Geotechnical Evaluation Big Horn Commerce a• Ptc sraea �-7 1 1-2 Big Horn Commerce Pattison Engineering Project Number 16-104 4� Gc-1' {{ yptat-�2J.&7s aw. s 1. >6GeE7+ Ftt. It Mys FAST, [475 :-06 INFILTRATION SITE -In f of, r 1 1 aa' HC SEW, PATTISON ENGINLERING, L.L.0 74 ORO VALLEY FINAL DESIGN PACKAGE COMMERCIAL GUIDE qDED P1.EY qR� �9ORO VALLEY $ FINAL DESIGN PACKAGE OVNOE�A PROCESS GUIDE - COMMERCIAL This process guide contains the process narrative, submittal checklist, and plan content for each of the three (3) Final Design Review submittal plans for commercial developments, including Final Site Plan, Final Architecture, and Final Public Art. 1.0 Final Design Package 1.1 Process Narrative (Pg. 3) 1.2 Application Form (single form for Final Site Plan, Final Architecture, and Final Public Art), (Pg. 5) 1.3 Final Design Review Submittal Checklist (Pg. 7) 1.4 Fee Schedule (Pg. 9) 1.5 Final Design Review Process Flow Chart (Pg. 10) 2.0 Final Site Plan Content 2.1 Plan Format (Pg. 11) 2.2 Plan Content (Pg. 13) 3.0 Final Landscape Plan Format and Content (Pg. 24) 4.0 Final Irrigation Plan Content (Pg. 35) 5.0 Final Rainwater Harvesting Content (Pg. 41) 6.0 Supplementary Documents (Pg. 49) 7.0 Final Architecture Format and Content (Pg. 51) 8.0 Final Public Art Format and Content (Pg. 52) 2 1.0 Final Design Package g1 h 1.1 Process Narrative Introduction: The Development and Infrastructure Services (DIS) Department is here to assist you through the Town's Design Review process. Throughout the process, you will be working closely with the Town staff to ensure the efficient processing of your application for development. The DIS Department is the primary point of contact that will help coordinate all facets of your development. For information on a specific topic relating to your development, please refer to the attached resource list or visit the DIS Department's website at http://orovalleyaz.gov/dis. The approval process for an application varies depending on the type of application. To better understand the approval process for the Town's Final Design applications, please refer to the table below. 1 anie oT AUtnorn Submittal -Type Staff Authority Town Council Authorit Final Site Plan Approve Appeal Final Architecture - Commercial Approve Appeal Final Public Art Approve Appeal Irrigation Plan Approve Appeal Rainwater Harvesting Plan Approve Appeal Process Overview: Design Review is a two-part process required for all new residential and non-residential projects in the Town, comprised of a Conceptual Design and Final Design. The Final Design process includes the submittal, review, and approval of the following: ❑ Final Site Plan ❑ Final Landscape Plan ❑ Final Architecture ❑ Final Public Art Plan ❑ Rainwater Harvesting Plan ❑ Irrigation Plan ❑ Final Plat (may be submitted with Final Design Plans on an at risk basis) ❑ Grading Plan (may by submitted with Final Design Plans on an at risk basis) ❑ Improvement Plans (may by submitted with Final Design Plans on an at risk basis) 3 The intent of the Final Design is to ensure that a project's Final Plans are consistent with the Conceptual Plans approved by Town Council and are consistent with all applicable Zoning Code requirements and outside agencies' adopted codes and provisions. ' Final Design — Process Description Step 1 — Pre -application Meeting Applicants must attend a pre -application meeting with the Development Review Committee (DRC) for a preliminary review of their final design applications to discuss the required process and broad issues related to the submittal. To initiate a pre -application meeting, applicants must submit a written request and preliminary drawings 10 working days prior to the expected meeting date. (Applicants should refer to the Pre -application Conference Process Guide for additional details). The Development Review Committee will send a review letter identifying any broad concerns with the application and the project's development process within 3 working days following the meeting. Step 2 — Formal Submittal Once the Pre -application process is satisfied, applicants may submit a formal Final Design package that includes: ❑ Final Site Plan ❑ Final Landscape Plan ❑ Final Architecture ❑ Final Public Art Plan ❑ Rainwater Harvesting Plan ❑ Irrigation Plan ❑ Final Plat (may be submitted with Final Design Plans on an at risk basis)— see Final Plat Process Guide ❑ Grading Plan (may by submitted with Final Design Plans on an at risk basis) ❑ Improvement Plans (may by submitted with Final Design Plans on an at risk basis) To ensure timely review, applicants should review the applicable provisions of the Zoning Code and ensure the submittal is complete. Step 4 — Staff Review and Approval After receiving a complete application, staff will review the Final Design for consistency with the approved conceptual plans and with the applicable provisions of the Zoning Code, engineering standards or other areas of review authority. A review letter will be sent to the applicant within 20 working days of the submission. The plans may need to be revised and re -submitted for additional reviews to address comments on the application. When all review comments have been addressed, staff may administratively approve the final plans. Step 7 —Appeal Administrative decisions are appealable to Town Council. n TOWN OF ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES DEPARTMENT 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE, ORO VALLEY, AZ. 85737 PHONE: (520) 229-4800 FAX: (520) 742-1022 www.orovalleyaz.gov/dis 1.2 GENERAL APPLICATION FORM Application Type: ❑ Major General Plan Amendment ❑ Rezoning/PAD Amendment ❑ Planned Area Development ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Zoning Code Amendment ❑ Conceptual Site Plan ❑ Conceptual Public Art ❑ Conceptual Architecture ❑ Final Site Plan ❑ Conceptual Landscape Plan Subiect Prooerty Information: Office Use Only OV Case #: ❑ Final Plat ❑ Pre -Application ❑ Zoning Verification ❑ Sign Criteria ❑ Sign - PAD Exemption ❑ Master Sign Program ❑ Communication Facility — Tier 1 and 2 Minor ❑ Communication Facility — Major ❑ Revised Development Plan ❑ Other Address: Parcel/Tax Code: Subdivision / Commercial Center Name: Book / Page or Sequence Number: Lot Number(s) Legal Description: Section/Township/Range: Area of Property: Existing Land Use: Proposed Land Use: Applicant Information: Applicant *: Name: Address: _ Telephone: Fax: Firm: Property Owner(s) if different from Applicant *: Name: Firm: Address: Telephone: Fax: Consultant*: Name: Address: _ Telephone: (Discipline) _ City: Email: City: _ Email: Firm: City: _ Fax: Email: 5 * If more than one, attach list State: Zip: State: Zip: State: Zip: Project Description/Narrative: I hereby certify that I have read and examined this application and know the same to be true and correct. I am the owner of the property or the Owner's authorized representative, and if not the owner, I have obtained the owner's permission to perform stated work. All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this type of work will be complied with whether specified herein or not. The approval of this application does not presume to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of any other federal, state or local law for which this project may be subject to. Notice: It is the applicant/owner's responsibility to ensure all private rules and regulations (such as Covenants, Conditions & Restrictions (CC&R's)) of the subdivision and/or commercial center are adhered to. Contact your Home Owners Association or property management to determine applicable requirements. It is also the applicant's responsibility to coordinate with all outside agencies to secure their acceptance or clearance. Failure to do so may delay issuance of permits. See attached list of agencies. Applicant's Signature Print Name Date Important Note: All submittals received after 4:00 p.m. will be processed the next day Submittals will be rejected if: • Not folded using Pima County fold & collated; • There are missing items on the checklist unless otherwise approved by Planning and Zoning Administrator or Town Engineer. • Re -submittals cannot be accepted without a transmittal and a written narrative summary describing the purpose of submittal. 6 1.3 Final Design Submittal Checklist All submittal requirements are included herein. The Final Design Package is submitted in 'two stages. • Post -Town Council Submittal, followed by • Construction Documents submitted for permit Please note additional site specific information may be required at staff discretion. ❑ Fees ❑ Response letter noting how each Town Council Condition of Approval, staff comment, and agency comment has been addressed for each plan component. Submittal Type ❑ Final Site Plan (Only) - Size 24"X 36" (8 copies) o Provide plan in .dwg (CAD) or .shp (ESRI shape file) format. ❑ Final Architectural Design Plan (Only): (4 copies) o Architectural elevations —Color, Size 11" X 17", o Building cross sections —Black and white, Size 11" X 17" o Color & materials palette — Size up to 11" X 17" o View of Building rooftop —Color, Size up toll" X 17" o Site Cross Sections —Color, Size up toll" X 17" ❑ Final Public Art Plan (Only): (5 copies) o Public Artwork Location —Size 11 "X 17" o Public Artwork Design — Color, Size up to 11"X 17" or 8 1/2" X 11" o Artwork Installation Schedule — Black and White, Size 8 1/2" X 11" o Final Maintenance Plan — Black and White, Size 8 1/2" X 11" o Final Itemized Budget — Black and White, Size 8 1/2" X 11" o Copy of Contract— Black and White, Size 8 1/2" X 11" o Evidence of Insurance — Black and White, Size 8 1/2" X 11" ❑ Final Landscape and Buffer yard Plans — Size 24" X 36" (5 copies) ❑ Final Irrigation Plans — Size 24" X 36" (5 copies) ❑ Rainwater Harvesting Plan — Size 24" X 36" (4 copies) ❑ Any additional reports or materials (3 copies) ❑ Final Plat (when required) - Size 24" X 36" (5 copies) ❑ Civil Improvement Plans (construction documents; at risk if submitted prior to approval of FSP) — Size 24" X 36" (5 copies) ❑ Building Plans (construction documents; at risk if submitted prior to approval of FSP) — Size 24" X 36" (7 copies for commercial or multi -family; 3 copies for model homes). By separate application; please see Permitting Checklist. 7 The following items must be provided as noted in approval letter: ❑ Conditions, Covenants &Restrictions (3 copies) ❑ Stormwater Pollution Prevention Control Plan (2 copies) ❑ Pima County Waste Water Sewage Conveyance Letter (2 copies)* ** ❑ Riparian Mitigation Plan (2 copies) ❑ Final Traffic Impact Analysis Report (2 copies) ❑ Geological Technical Report (2 copies) ❑ Drainage Report (2 copies) ❑ Phase 1 Environmental Assessment (2 copies) ❑ Odor Abatement Plan (2 copies) ❑ Assurances ❑ Title Report, current within 30 days, including Schedule B items with all associated documents (2 copies) ❑ Boundary closure calculations with coordinate reference to identifiable points (1 copy) ❑ Final plat or revision to lot line: provide plan in .shp (ESRI shape file) format. For re -submittals and subsequent staff reviews, the number of copies shall be noted in staff comment letter, plus one copy for the file 1.3 FEE SCHEDULE (REVISED MAY 18, 2011) As specified in the OVZCR, all fees must be paid in full prior to acceptance of an application. Fees identified after submittal are due as determined by the Planning and Zoning Administrator (Public Works Director for rights -of -way fees). All fees must be paid prior to the issuance of permits and/or release of assurances. Bond release inspections may be deducted from the appropriate bond if this is part of the language of the bond. Charges for partial review of any project will be based on the stage of review and staff time already dedicated to the project. The Planning and Zoning Administrator may refund up to 80% of the fee. The Planning and Zoning Administrator may waive fees if an undue hardship has been created by the Town. All other fee waiver requests must be approved by the Town Council. Fees will not be applied to applications or events initiated or sponsored by the Planning and Zoning Commission or Town Council. GIS fees are charged per development project. For example, GIS fees charged for a rezoning would be credited toward the GIS fees specified for a related development plan and/or plat. Whenever independent consultant review is provided for in the OVZCR (Golf Course Overlay, Communications facilities, Riparian analysis etc.), the applicant must reimburse the Town for all consultant fees incurred. Fees related to: Final Design — Commercial (Please note additional fees may apply): Final Site Plan Included in Conceptual Site Plan fees Natural Open Space No Charge Final Commercial Architecture (1st $270 building ad Additional Building Pads $100/each Landscape Plan (up to 2 acres $1000 Each additional acre $60 3rd and additional reviews 50% of original plan fee Final Public Art $220 Native Plant Preservation Plan Review $1000 (up to 2 acres See the Development Services fee schedule for a complete list of fees. Final Design Review Flow Chart v G 0 70 ci Rn .n rr G 0 Notes: *Approvals are based upon the approved conceptual plans **Plans may be submitted concurrently on an at -risk basis :....:submission Review Approval *The`FinalDeslgrt Review (FDR) is to -The FOR process is an administrative review unless the' -Following an FDR approval, the O1 EV q QO4pu 9i202 O� .9 nk Y A 4 }�OLNDE�,9�aa 4.1 PLAN FORMAT All Sheets 4.0 ORO VALLEY FINAL IRRIGATION PLAN CONTENT 1. The irrigation plan (IR) must be drawn to a scale of one inch equals forty feet (1"= 40') on sheets measuring 24" x 36", including a page border with margins as described in 1.2.1.A.2. Scale to be the same for all sheets. Different sheet size or scale must be pre -approved by the Town Engineer and Planning and Zoning Director. 2. The IR must include a page border, 1/16" (0.0625 inches) width, with one-half (1/2") inch margins on the top, bottom and right hand sides of the page; and a two (2") inch margin on the left hand side of the page. 3. Margins are to only contain the name of the project in the lower right hand corner below the Title Block. 4. All lettering and dimensions must be the equivalent of twelve (0.12") point font or greater in size. 5. In the lower right corner of each sheet, provide an enclosed Title Block which includes: i. "Irrigation Plan" ii. Name of development iii. "Lots through and Common Areas A through of, if applicable. iv. Brief legal description, i.e. "Portion of Section , T S, R E, G&SRB&M, Town of Oro Valley, Pima County, Arizona V. Scale vi. Contour interval vii. Date (revised plans must show date of revision) viii. Town of Oro Valley case number for development plan ix. Sheet of (total pages) 6. Reference Case Numbers (e.g. general plan amendments, rezoning, variance) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 7. Each sheet must bear the seal and signature of the registered professional who prepared the plan in the lower right hand corner near the title block. 35 8. Show north arrow in the upper right corner of each page that include the site layout. Every effort must be made to have north oriented toward the top of the sheet. Slight rotation may be made to accommodate long narrow parcels, convenient match lines, etc., but in no case will the north arrow point downward without pre -approval. 9. If the IR consists of more than one (1) sheet, a small index drawing of the site showing the area represented on each sheet must be placed on the right side of each sheet. 10. If the firm name, address and phone number of the registrant who prepared the plan is to be listed on every sheet, then it must be in the lower right hand corner of the page immediately next to the Title Block. 4.2 PLAN CONTENT All Sheets 1. Ensure all line types are different and clearly indicated. 2. The development exterior site property boundary line must be delineated with a solid BOLD line, which must be the boldest line on the plan. 3. If more than one zone applies, show the zoning boundary line on the plan. 4. Each sheet depicting a plan must include the reference match line "See sheet " on edges of the plan where an abutting sheet depicts more information. 5. List all keynotes on the left side of each page. 6. All meters shall have a backflow protection device installed on the customer side of the meter. Cover Sheet 1. The following is to be centered at the top of the cover sheet in bold lettering with a font of forty (0.40") point or greater: i. Irrigation Plan ii. Project Name iii. Oro Valley Case Number (Using format OVXX-XX-XX) 2. For projects that cannot fit the entire development on a single plan sheet at 40 scale, a site plan of the entire project (scale to vary to accommodate placement on the cover sheet) is to be centered, toward the top of the page directly below the information listed above; and is to include at a minimum, the following: i. North arrow ii. Lot lines iii. Sheet cuts 36 iv. Building pads V. Building labels vi. Parking vii. Circulation viii. Name of adjacent development. Graphically depict abutting lot lines, include entire residential lot(s) and significant land use features such as adjacent parking, etc. ix. Roadways X. Onsite and immediately adjacent street names. 3. A legend which depicts and describes all symbols used in the document. 4. Approval block with signature line for Planning & Zoning Administrator, and date. 5. List the following in the lower right hand side of the cover sheet in close proximity to the Title Block: i. The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents must be provided. The applicable registration or license number must be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered landscape architect. All sealing must be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 6. A small project location map must be drawn in the upper right hand corner with north oriented to top of the sheet. The map must cover approximately one (1) square mile, be drawn at a scale of 3" = 1 mile, and provide the following information: i. The subject property identified and centered within a one square mile area. ii. Any adjacent conditions (i.e. subdivisions, non-residential development, un-subdivided land, schools, existing zoning, major streets, rivers, railroads, National Forests, Nations, reservations, and city, town or other jurisdictional limits.) iii. The section, township and range of the subject development. iv. Labeled section corners V. A north arrow and scale Plan Sheets(s) — Existing and Proposed Conditions Content 1. Existing and proposed sidewalks, roadways, pavement, curbs, walls, and parking areas (lighter line weight). 2. Existing and proposed storm drainage facilities. K17 3. Existing and proposed buildings, patios, and any other structures. 4. Existing and proposed water lines. 5. Graphically depict details and location of system for underground, automatic irrigation to all landscaped areas in plan with legend, including: i. Drip irrigation, low flow bubblers, or similar components ii. Self timing devices iii. Meter locations iv. Areas where irrigation will be discontinued after five years. 6. Irrigation Plan must also include: i. Irrigation valve, pipe and emitter schedule ii. Specifications for irrigation system tubing, such as polyvinyl chloride (PVC) iii. Inspection schedule for irrigation system iv. Irrigation control schedule on plan in -table format 7. Provide Landscape Water Plan in table format (see example below) on Landscape Plan, and in Microsoft Excel file, and include: i. Water use reduction schedule in accordance with OVZCR Section 27.6.D.3.e. and f., that begins implementation three (3) years after issuance of the first certificate of occupancy. ii. The total values for monthly and annual irrigation water use (gallons) that are indicated in the Plant Material Schedule on the landscape plan must be incorporated. iii. Phased reduction plan shown by month, so that by the end of three years, the "Total water at maturity" value is achieved. By the end of five years, the amount of metered irrigation water used at the site must be fifty (50%) percent of the ADWR "Total water use at maturity" value. iv. As part of the reduction plan, the amount of irrigation water received by plants in buffers, medians, and ROWs must equal zero at five (5) years. V. Delineation of project phases, if applicable, and associated water use for each phase. vi. LWP should include monthly irrigation values for years 4 and 5. The values should reflect a gradual decrease in irrigation from the end of year 3 to the end of year 5. Seasonal variation in irrigation needs should also be incorporated. 38 EXAMPLE OF A LANDSCAPE WATER PLAN' Landscape Water Plan Winter Spring Summer Monsoon Winter Month 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Year 3: Continue to increase irrigation water use as needed as plants mature up to, but not exceeding, 100% ADWR value by end of year. (average monthly water use = 7332 gal/month 7,000 7,500 17,900 18,500 18,700 18,700 16,000 16,000 16,800 17,332 17,100 16,900 TOTAL (100% ADWR = 87,998 gal/year) 81,632 Year 4: Begin gradually decreasing irrigation to buffer, median, and ROW areas in order to reach zero irrigation in those areas by end of year 5. (to reach 75% ADWR by end of year, average monthly water use = 5,500 al/month 6,700 6,500 6,300 6,500 7,000 7,000 3,500 3,500 4,100 4,700 4,600 4,100 TOTAL (75% ADWR = 65,991 gal/year) 65,000 Year 5: Continue decreasing irrigation to buffer, median, and ROW areas. By end of year 5, irrigation to buffer, median, and ROW areas must be zero, and total amount of water used at site must meet 50% of ADWR maturity value. (average monthly water use = 3,666 gal/month 4,000 14,000 14,100 4,200 14,500 14,500 12,000 12,000 12,500 13,666 13,500 13,500 TOTAL 50% ADWR = 43,991 gal/year) 42,466 ' This irrigation reduction schedule is provided for illustrative purposes. The exact irrigation reduction schedule should be developed by the project landscape designer for the particular site. w' 4.3 REQUIRED NOTES General Notes 1. Irrigation and/or watering plans shall meet the minimum standards of the American Society of Irrigation Consultants. 2. If desert landscaping is used which will ultimately rely on natural water sources, a temporary drip irrigation system shall be employed until such time as the plant materials are sustained by natural water sources. 3. The property owner is responsible for maintaining the temporary system as long as necessary in order to transition plants over to natural sources. Any plant materials that die in transition, for any reason, shall be replaced in accordance with Sec. 27.6.E.4., Maintenance. 4. Irrigation systems connected to potable water mains (public or private) shall be equipped with backflow preventers. 5. The annual water use for a project shall not exceed the annual landscape water plan. 6. Irrigation meter readings shall be used to determine compliance with the landscape water plan. Non-compliance is subject to penalties under Oro Valley Town Code. 7. Meter readings shall be taken, at a minimum, on an annual basis. Monthly readings may be required, at the discretion of the Planning and Zoning Administrator, in order to address non-compliance with the Water Plan. 8. An initial meter reading shall be taken prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy and recorded for reference as part of the water plan. 9. Irrigation water shall not leave the landscaped areas and flow onto roads, parking areas or sidewalks. 10. Sprinkler heads shall be installed at least eight (8) inches away from impermeable surfaces. .O pLIEV Aqi ro 5.0 ORO VALLEY FINAL - RAINWATER HARVESTING PLAN NDED�9A� CONTENT 5.1 PLAN FORMAT All Sheets 1. Rainwater Harvesting plan (RHP) must be drawn to a scale of one inch equals forty feet (1 "= 40') on sheets measuring 24" x 36", including a page border with margins as described in 1.2.1.A.2. Scale to be the same for all sheets. Different sheet size or scale must be pre -approved by the Town Engineer and Planning and Zoning Administrator. 2. RHP must include a page border, 1/16" (0.0625 inches) width, with one-half (1/2") inch margins on the top, bottom and right hand sides of the page; and a two (2") inch margin on the left hand side of the page. 3. Margins are to only contain the name of the project in the lower right hand corner below the Title Block. 4. All lettering and dimensions must be the equivalent of twelve (0.12") point font or greater in size. 5. In the lower right corner of each sheet, provide an enclosed Title Block which includes: i. "Rainwater Harvesting Plan" ii. Name of development iii. "Lots through and Common Areas A through if applicable iv. Brief legal description, i.e. "Portion of Section T S, R E, G&SRB&M, Town of Oro Valley, Pima County, Arizona V. Scale vi. Contour interval vii. Date (revised plans must show date of revision) viii. Town of Oro Valley case number for development plan ix. Sheet of (total pages) 6. Reference Case Numbers (e.g. general plan amendments, rezoning, and variance) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 7. Each sheet must bear the seal and signature of both the Landscape Architect preparing the associated Landscape Plan and the Civil Engineer preparing the associated Grading Plans in the lower right hand corner near the title block. 41 8. Show north arrow in the upper right corner of each page that includes the site layout. Every effort must be made to have north oriented toward the top of the sheet. Slight rotation may be made to accommodate long narrow parcels, convenient match lines, etc., but in no case will the north arrow point downward without pre -approval. 9. If RHP consists of more than one (1) sheet, a small index drawing of the site showing the area represented on each sheet must be placed on the right side of each sheet. 10. If the firm name, address and phone number of the registrant who prepared the plan is to be listed on every sheet, then it must be in the lower right hand corner of the page immediately next to the Title Block. 5.2 PLAN CONTENT All Sheets 1. Ensure all line types are different and clearly indicated. 2. The development exterior site property boundary line must be delineated with a solid BOLD line, which must be the boldest line on the plan. 3. If more than one zone applies, show the zoning boundary line on the plan. 4. Each sheet depicting a plan must include the reference match line "See sheet " on edges of the plan where an abutting sheet depicts more information. 5. List all keynotes on the left side of each page. 6. In schematic form, delineate rainwater harvesting measures employed and how they are integrated within both the Landscape and Grading Plans. Refer herein to section 1.2.3.C., Proposed Content, for specific rainwater harvesting delineation details. Cover Sheet 1. The following is to be centered at the top of the cover sheet in bold lettering with a font of forty (0.40") point or greater: i. Rainwater Harvesting Plan ii. Project Name iii. Oro Valley Case Number (Using format OVXX-XX) 2. For projects for which the entire development will not fit on a single plan sheet at 40 scale, a site plan of the entire project (scale to vary to accommodate placement on the cover sheet) must be centered, toward the top of the page 42 directly below the information listed above; and include at a minimum, the following: i. North arrow ii. Lot lines iii. Sheet cuts iv. Building pads V. Building labels vi. Parking vii. Circulation viii. Name of adjacent development. Graphically depict abutting lot lines, include entire residential lot(s) and significant land use features such as adjacent parking, etc. ix. Roadways X. Onsite and immediately adjacent street names 3. A legend which depicts and describes all symbols used in the document. 4. An approval block is to be listed on the cover sheet with signature lines for the following individuals: i. Planning and Zoning Administrator H. Town Engineer Plan Sheets(s) — Existing Conditions Content The following information must be shown on all plan sheets to indicate the existing conditions on the site and within one hundred (100) feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street, the existing conditions across the street will be provided to a minimum distance of 100 feet. 1. Delineate all existing vegetative areas that shall be preserved. 2. Existing contours at 1-foot intervals labeled frequently. Two -foot or 5-foot contours may be used in special cases. Extend contours 100 feet outside the property line. 3. For existing streets adjacent to the project, show the following information: i. Label street as public or private ii. Street name iii. Utility locations 4. All existing easements shall be drawn on the plan with a dashed line, and recording information, widths and purposes must be included. Label each as existing public, private or specific (i.e. Tucson Electric Power, Southwest Gas). If 43 the easement is not in use and/or proposed for release, so indicate. Blanket easements should be listed as notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. 5. Existing sidewalks along abutting right-of-way. 6. Parking lot layout to scale with all PAAL's, parking spaces and driveways. 7. Existing storm drainage facilities (i.e. detention basins, dykes, dams) on and adjacent to the site. 8. Other significant conditions on the site, such as major rock outcrops, structures, fences, walls, etc. These elements must be indicated in a different line weight than the proposed improvements and labeled to be removed or retained. 9. Conditions on adjacent land significantly affecting the design of the project, such as the approximate direction and gradients of ground slope; character and location of adjacent development and drainage ways, arroyos, ditches, and channels, including their existing conditions. 10.The locations and footprints of all existing structures. Label heights, dimensions and uses within the building footprint. 11.The following information regarding existing utilities must be provided: i. The location and size of water wells ii. Water pumping plants iii. Water reservoirs iv. Water lines V. Fire hydrants vi. Sanitary and storm sewers, including the pipe diameter and all manholes and cleanouts. Show the existing sewer lines with thinner or shaded lines, to distinguish them from the proposed sewer lines. vii. The location of gas lines, electric and telephone lines, poles and communications cables. viii. On -ground junction boxes, and street lights. 12. Identify the locations of all utilities and service equipment immediately adjacent to the project. 13.The following existing water infrastructure information must be indicated on the .development plan: L Existing mains indicated with lighter dashed lines ii. Hydrant locations iii. Meters shown 44 Plan Sheets(s) — Proposed Conditions Content The following information on the proposed project must be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 1. Delineate the following information for all Multi -Family Residential, Commercial, Technical Park and other non-residential developments: i. In schematic form show the locations of all active and/or passive rainwater harvesting measures. Specify rainwater harvesting system(s) to be utilized. ii. All active rainwater harvesting features shall be delineated on the plan at actual scale. The following information shall accompany each feature: a. Volume b. Manufacturer's information such as model number and material of construction c. If any features are cross connected to the irrigation system, identify locations of backflow prevention d. Identify all accessory appurtenances associated with the each individual system iii. All passive rainwater harvesting catchments shall be delineated on the plan at actual scale. The following information shall accompany each basin: a. Area b. Depth c. Volume iv. Identify the following grading information in schematic form: a. Flow direction of the design grading by the use of flow arrows b. Grade break points c. Drainage sub -area watershed boundaries supplying each rainwater harvesting feature. Specify the size of each sub- area watershed. V. If the project is phased, delineate the above information separately for each phase. 2. Delineate the following information for all Single Family and Townhouse Residential developments: 45 i. Detail typical front yard grading scheme(s) of individual lots in schematic form utilizing flow arrows, grade break points and relative spot elevations. ii. Indicate proposed plant materials by symbol for front yard of each applicable grading scheme. iii. In schematic form, identify the following grading information for recreation areas, common areas and buffer yards: a. Flow direction of the design grading by the use of flow arrows b. Grade break points c. Drainage sub -area watershed boundaries supplying each rainwater harvesting feature. Specify the size of each sub- area watershed. iv. If project is phased, delineate the above information separately for each phase. 3. The landscape planting design with all plant designation symbols as depicted on the landscape plan. 4. In a darker line weight, show the locations and footprints of all proposed structures. If more than one building is being proposed within the development, provide a naming/numbering system that clearly identifies each new building. 5. All proposed lot lines. 6. If the project has common areas, label each common area individually with a separate letter designation. Enclose each area (i.e. common area, private street) that will have separate restrictions or a separate homeowners' association, or any common area that is separated by a public right-of-way, with a solid line. 7. Delineate proposed natural open space. 8. All pads and building envelopes for each lot. 9. List all proposed uses and use categories on the property. 10.If the project is to be phased, provide all necessary information (i.e. calculations, setbacks) to indicate that each phase complies with all requirements as a separate entity. Show and label any temporary landscape improvements that may be needed to make the site function for each phase as one entity. If such temporary improvements are off the site of the phase under consideration, a temporary easement or other legal documentation to assure legal use of the property is required. Note recording information. 11.On-site pedestrian circulation 12.In light shading, show extent of proposed paving on the site. 46 13. Parking lot layout 14. Sight visibility triangles with appropriate dimensions at all driveways and street intersections if the sight triangles encroach on the project site or if project landscaping in the street ROW is within the sight triangle. Also delineate the sight visibility triangle for all interior PAAL to PAAL and/or street intersections. i. Materials within the sight visibility triangles must be placed so as not to interfere with a visibility plane described by two horizontal lines located thirty (30) inches and seventy two (72) inches above finished grade of the roadway surface. 15. Proposed sidewalks along abutting right-of-way. 16. Location of postal service. 17. Locations and types of proposed ground mounted signs 18. Refuse collection areas and loading zones, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials. 19.Any encroachment into the 100 year floodplain limits must be in conformance with the most current Oro Valley Floodplain Management Ordinance. 20. Sanitary sewer information: i. Preliminary sewer layout, including points of connection to existing sewers, all manhole locations, size of pipe, and proposed flow-thru locations, must be shown, if applicable. 21. Water infrastructure information: i. Proposed mains shown within easements and indicated with a darker solid lines I Hydrant locations iii. Meters shown 22. List and delineate any new proposed easements. 23.All access roads and any proposed changes to existing driveways. 47 5.3 REQUIRED NOTES General Notes 1. Add the following general notes for all Multi -Family Residential, Commercial, Technical Park and other non-residential developments: L "Total area of all new impervious surfaces including pavements, sidewalks, hardscape areas and buildings is " I "Total volume of rainwater harvesting provided is " iii. "Rainwater harvesting measures employed for this development consist of the following: 11 (list the active and/or passive measures provided) iv. "All rainwater harvesting measures shown on this plan shall be integrated into both the landscape installation as well as the site grading construction." 2. Add the following general notes for all Single Family and Townhouse Residential developments: i. "Only the lot grading scheme(s) identified within the Applicable Grading Scheme table shall be offered to the individual home buyer for each lot listed." ii. "All rainwater harvesting measures shown on this plan shall be integrated into both the landscape installation as well as the site grading construction." 3. Add the following table to the general notes section for all Single Family and Townhouse Residential developments: Applicable Grading Scheme Table Lot Number 1ADDlicable Gradina Scheme —A 0 "9 6.0 SUPPLEMENTARY DOCUMENTS a °► DED.t91sa 6.1 ADDITIONAL NOTIFICATION In addition to the Town of Oro Valley (the "Town"), there may be other jurisdictions affecting development of this property. If a property developer waits until late in the development process to contact other pertinent governmental agencies or bodies, additional expense and time in coordination, redesign and development may be a result. Examples of other governmental agencies and/or bodies that may have overlapping jurisdiction over this property include but are not limited to the following: Federal: The United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service is responsible for Endangered Species Act compliance, etc. Please note, habitat has been designated with the Town. U.S Fish and Wildlife Field Division 2321 W. Royal Palm Rd., Suite 103 Phoenix, AZ 85021-4951 Phone (602) 640-2720 Fax (602) 620-2730 The United States Corps of Engineers: This agency is responsible for management of jurisdictional waters, etc. Section 404 consultations may be required on properties that contain washes. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 5205 E. Comanche Davis Monthan AFB Tucson, AZ 85707 Phone (520) 5844486 Fax (520) 5844497 State: Arizona Department of Environmental Quality: This agency has multiple responsibilities. Please contact directly for further information. ADEQ I I10 W. Washington Street Phoenix, AZ 85007 (602)771-2300 County: Pima County Department of Environmental Quality: This agency has multiple responsibilities. Please contact directly for further information. PDEQ 201 N. Stone Avenue, 211 Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 740-6520 Please be advised, issuance of a permit DOES NOT, nor should it be construed, to imply compliance with Federal, State or County regulations. If you have any questions concerning your responsibilities under federal law, please contact the applicable agency. APPLICANT NAME: CONTACT PHONE AND ADDRESS: SITE LOCATION: PROPOSED USE: Applicant Signature Date Case/File Number 49 OQO�1P�-EY < r e � r s _ � A 15t/NDE0101 6.2 ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORDS OFFICE PROCEDURES The ASM Archaeological Records Office is open 10am - 3pm M-F to authorized users by appointment ONLY. Call (520) 621-4011 or email azsite(M-email.arizona.edu to arrange a research visit. Your appointment must be confirmed. First-time users are required to complete the ASM Archaeological Records Use Agreement form. Cultural Resource analysis must be conducted by a Cultural Resource Professional selected from the Town's list of on -call Cultural Resource Professionals listed below: • Desert Archaeology, Inc. • Statistical Research, Inc. • William Self Associates, Inc. • Tierra Right -of -Way Services, Ltd. • Logan Simpson Design, Inc. • Westland Resources, Inc. By law, the ASM is the repository for archaeological information gathered from sites and surveys on state, county, or municipal land. By agreement with the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), the ASM is the public repository for sites on BLM lands. Therefore, when planning to work on state, county, municipal, or BLM lands, always complete a search of the records maintained at the ASM Archaeological Records Office to obtain information on previous work in the area. In addition, the Archaeological Records Office retains many records for compliance work done on federal lands besides the BLM, but it is usually necessary to check relevant U.S. Forest Service (USFS) or National Park Service (NPS) offices to ensure a thorough file search. If the project area is expected to contain standing historic structures (such as buildings, bridges, dams, etc.) you will also consult the Cultural Resource Inventory at the SHPO (602-542-4009). Researchers may search the archaeological records themselves or may request that Records Office staff perform the search. On request, the staff will photocopy site cards, reports, and other records. Archaeological Records Fees Records Access Records Search Photocopying FAX charges Permit Fees No charge $100.00 minimum* *additional fees may apply $0.50 / page 3 pages free, Thereafter $1.00/page AAA Blanket Permit No charge AAA Project -Specific Permit No charge Review and Process Project -Specific Permit (<5 working days) $500.00 Records Management / Repository Agreement No charge Project Registration Fee (survey/non-site monitoring) $85.00 minimum $20 / person field -day Make checks payable to The University of Arizona 50 7.0 ORO VALLEY �p�IEY Q����ti Of` 9 FINAL ARCHITECTURE CONTENT } `FO�/NDED �g�A! Final Architectural is one of the three primary elements of the Final Design Review submittal and is a required element of all non-residential projects in Oro Valley as specified in the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised. Please review Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised Section 27.3 to learn of all public art Final architecture is reviewed by Town Staff for conformance with the Conceptual Architecture approved by Town Council and all applicable zoning code standards. Final architecture may be administratively approved by Town Staff. 7.1 Plan Format: Submittals must include printouts on paper no larger than 11 "x17". All submittals must be folded to 8 %" X 11" and collated. Also, an electronic version of all submittal materials in PDF format are required. 7.2 Plan Content: 3 copies of the following (except as indicated): — Narrative describing how architectural Design Principles (see Section 22.9.D.5) and Design Standards (see Addendum "A") have been met — Color Renderings of all buildings, structures, and elevations clearly depicting overall building composition, facade design elements - Size 11"x17" folded to 8'/2' x 11" in size (3 copies) — Preliminary Color and Materials Palette for all elevations of all principal and accessory structures and site walls; this shall include roof material, accents, wainscot, etc. Note: Photographs of proposed building materials is required, actual materials (i.e. materials boards) will not be accepted (3 copies) — Vignettes of the following: o Overall building composition o Entry building and other structures o Architectural features and facade design elements Building cross sections with floor elevation and heights (including roof, parapet, screening, and architectural features) — Site cross sections depicting overall topography in relation to neighboring property and existing grade line — Site photographs of the project site and adjacent properties illustrating the relationship between proposed development and adjacent development/properties (3 copies) — Electronic version of all submittal material in PDF format (1 copy) 51 oQotN?FY gRiZpy9 8.0 ORO VALLEY A FINAL PUBLIC ART Al DED�CONTENT Public artwork is one of the three primary elements of the Final Design Review submittal and is a required element of private and public commercial construction projects in Oro Valley as specified in the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised. Please review Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised Section 27.3 to learn of all public art requirements. Final Public Art is reviewed by Town Staff for conformance with the Conceptual Public Art approved by Town Council and all applicable zoning code standards. Final Public Art may be administratively approved by Town Staff. 8.1 Plan Format: Submittals must include printouts on paper no larger than 11" x 17". All submittals must be folded to 8 %" X 11" and collated. 8.2 Plan Submittal Contents ❑ Fees ❑ A completed General Application Form ❑ All required items in the Conceptual Public Art Content list (Section 2.0) (9 copies) ❑ A Location Map - 8.5" x 11 ", including existing streets. (9 copies) ❑ Letter of authorization from property owner, if applicant is acting as an agent. ❑ Aerial photograph (8.5" x 11" format), showing size and location of property and existing streets. (9 copies) ❑ Electronic version of all submittal material in PDF format (1 copy) 52 8.3 CONCEPTUAL PUBLIC ART CONTENT 1. Narrative description of the proposed art project including: intent and vision of the design, placement of art, and the commissioning of a project artist, as well as how the proposed artwork fits into the site plan and overall design theme of the project. Please note, conformance with the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised definition of "public artwork" must be achieved. 2. The location of public artwork shall be indicated on the Conceptual Site Plan (on 11"x17" paper). If the artwork is incorporated on or adjacent to an exterior building elevation, provide architecture renderings. Copies of the applicable plan are required. 3. Identify typical art characteristics that illustrate the use and style of the art, including scale drawing, dimension, height, materials and color palette, and if the art is to be freestanding, integrated, and/or functional. 4. Implementation timeline - Please note, art must be installed and certified as complete prior to Certificate of Occupancy. 5. Preliminary estimate of public art commitment calculated with 1 % of the building permit valuation (construction cost) for the total project, including all phases of a multi -phase project. The building official shall review and approve all preliminary estimates for building permit valuations used as the basis for determining the public are calculation. The final calculation shall be reconciled at the time of building permit issuance and the art budget revised if there is a differential of 10%, or more, between the preliminary estimate of public art commitment calculated with 1 % of the building permit valuation (construction cost) and the final building permit's construction cost valuation. Note: According to the International Building Code (IBC), valuations shall include total value of work, including material and labor, for which the permit is being issued, such as electrical equipment, plumbing equipment and permanent systems. If in the opinion of the building official, the valuation is underestimated on the application, the permit shall be denied, unless the applicant can show detailed estimates to meet the approval of the building official. Final building permit valuation shall be set by the building official. 6. A statement addressing compliance with each of the review criteria specified in the Oro Valley Zoning Code Section 27.3.G (See Section 3.4, Design and Location Requirements). 7. Provide a narrative depicting the installation of the artwork, how the artwork will be protected, and provide for public safety. Please submit a graphic if necessary. 8. Artist(s) Biography — Please note, conformance with the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised, definition of "artist' must be depicted. 8.4 PUBLIC ART GUIDELINES 1. Purpose A. The purpose of the Public Art Guidelines is to clarify the requirements of the Call for Artists process and requirements. 2. Applicability A. Applicability: These guidelines shall apply to all projects subject to the Public Artwork Provisions in Section 27.3 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code. B. All projects shall comply with the Oro Valley Zoning Code. These guidelines are intended to complement the Zoning Code. If any provision of these guidelines is in conflict with the Zoning Code, the Zoning Code shall prevail. 3. Call for Artists Process A. Public artwork projects requiring a call for artists process as defined by Section 27.3 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code shall be administered by a qualified agent. B. The Planning and Zoning Administrator shall maintain a list of qualified agents as defined in Subsection D of these Guidelines. C. Qualified agents shall administer the Call in accordance with the process requirements in Subsection E of these Guidelines. 4. Qualified Agents A. Agents shall be qualified by the Planning and Zoning Administrator subject to the following criteria: i. Not -for -profit status ii. Dedicated staff iii. Past experience in developing and conducting Call for Artists processes iv. Access to regional and national listserves, clearing houses and publications v. Fee policies vi. Timeframes 5. Call for Artists Process Requirements A. A Request for Qualifications (RFQ) is advertised at the discretion of the applicant, the call for artists process may utilize a Request for Proposals (RFP) based process. i. Information in the RFQ shall include, but is not limited to the following: a. Project description and goals, including applicant desired art medium and style b. Project parameters and scope -of -work c. Application deadline and timeline d. Application procedure and submittal requirements e. Selection procedure 54 0 A 0 E. f. Criteria for selection of artist and/or artwork g. Budget ii. The RFQ must be advertised for at least 30 days on at least two listserves, databases or clearing houses, that are openly accessible to practicing artists. iii. Projects with building permit valuations over $1,000,000 but less than $4,000,000 shall be at least advertised regionally. At least one listserve, database or clearing house publication must be regionally distributed (southwestern or adjacent states to Arizona) and accessible. iv. Projects with building permit valuations over $4,000,000 shall be advertised nationally. At least one listserve, database or clearing house publication must be nationally distributed and accessible. v. The RFQ may be sent to individual artists as an invitation to participate, strictly in addition to the requirements in this section. A selection panel, chosen by the "Qualified Agent" as directed by the applicant, reviews responses to the RFQ and selects no less than two (2) finalists. i. Panel composition: a. At least one (1) Representative of the applicant. b. At least two (2) arts professionals. c. At least one (1) resident of the Town of Oro Valley. d. The Planning and Zoning administrator shall verify the selection panel meets the above composition requirements. ii. Conflict of Interest: Persons who would directly benefit from the selection of a particular artist or artwork are ineligible as panelists (i.e. gallery owners, brokers, artist representatives, etc.). Prospective panelists may be asked to fill out a conflict of interest form prior to being approved for service on a Selection Panel. Finalists are invited to interview and may be required to submit conceptual proposals. The selection panel selects an artist to complete the project. The Qualified Agent shall produce a summary of the call for artists process and results. This summary shall be included in the formal submittal to the Town. i. Summary shall include: a. When, where, and for how long the call for artists advertisement was listed or published b. Number of applicants and finalists c. Panel composition 55 8.5 PUBLIC ART DESIGN PRINCIPLES (Zoning Code Section 27.3.1-1) The Conceptual Design Review Board shall assess individual applications based on conformance with the adopted design standards — Addendum "A" of the Zoning Code and fulfillment of the following principles: 1. Quality: Artwork demonstrates originality, artistic quality, and excellence in design and craftsmanship; to be demonstrated through renderings, explanation of construction, materials, and artist resume. 2. Response to Context: Artworks should be appropriate in scale, material, form and content for the immediate and general social and physical environments with which they are to relate. 3. Durability: Consideration should be given to structural and surface integrity, permanence, and protection against theft, vandalism, weathering, and excessive maintenance and repair costs. 4. Integration: Where possible, in addition to meeting aesthetic requirements, artworks should also serve to establish focal points, modify, enhance or define specific spaces or establish identity. 5. Safety: Artworks should not present a hazard or create unsafe conditions. 6. Diversity: Artworks should contribute to a diversity of style, scale, media, artists, community values and forms of expression within the Town. 7. Visibility: Artworks should be visible and accessible for the purposes of public enjoyment and security, considering pedestrian and vehicular traffic, lighting, active hours on site and future development and vegetation growth. 8. Feasibility: Consideration should be given to the likelihood of successful completion of the artwork. Factors to be considered include but are not limited to: project budget, timeline, artist's experience and soundness of materials. 9. Public art shall not reflect or include advertising elements of a business or corporation including colors, graphics, logos or other representations of corporate identity. 8.6 PUBLIC ART DEFINITIONS 1. "Artist" shall mean an individual generally recognized by critics and peers as a professional, full time practitioner of the visual arts, as judged by the quality of that professional practitioner's body of work, education, experience, past commissions, exhibition record, publications, and production of artwork. 2. "Public Artwork" shall mean artwork that is accessible to the community and the general public. It may be privately funded and owned or it may be fully funded by public agencies for public benefit. Public artwork adds aesthetic appeal, draws visitors and improves the image of the Town. It entails the application of skill and taste by an artist in creating an original work of art. Privately funded and owned public artwork may not include: directional graphics or color -coded location indicators; mass-produced or standard "off -the -shelf" items, including playground equipment, fountains, or statuary, and most art reproductions. 8.7 DESIGN AND LOCATION REQUIREMENTS Zoning Code Section 27.3.G 1. Public artwork shall be designed by an artist, as defined in Chapter 31. If a design team is employed to create public artwork, at least one (1) team member shall be an artist as defined in Chapter 31. 2. Public artwork shall not include any of the following unless specifically allowed by the Conceptual Design Review Board and the item is designed by an artist: architectural elements or structural parts of a building or other structure; fixtures or features such as grates, shade screens, streetlights, benches, signs, and bike racks. Designs of such items shall clearly result in artistic expression beyond the normally anticipated functional appearance. 3. Public artwork shall be in an area easily accessible and clearly visible to the general public. The location shall allow for unrestricted viewing from a variety of vantage points. 4. Public artwork may be located on a publicly viewable building facade, provided such location improves overall public accessibility to the artwork. 5. Artwork may be located within a building subject to Conceptual Design Review Board approval. The applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Conceptual Design Review Board that the interior location for artwork provides equal or superior public access relative to outdoor locations. Indoor locations shall be readily accessible to the public such as lobbies and entryways and shall be accessible to the public for a minimum of forty (40) hours each week. 6. The location of public artwork shall be indicated on the landscape plan, development plan, plat or other appropriate document as determined by the Planning and Zoning Administrator. 7. Public artwork shall be permanent, and may be integrated with the work of other design professionals. 8. Public artwork shall not be located in sight visibility triangles. 9. Location of art in a proposed or existing Town right-of-way shall be approved by the Town Engineer. 10. Off -site locations within the Town for public artwork maybe approved by the Town Council, upon review and recommendation by the Conceptual Design Review Board. 58 8.8 FEE IN -LIEU OF PUBLIC ART Zoning Code Section 27.3.D 1. If the building permit valuation is less than two million dollars ($2,000,000), the owner/developer may elect to contribute the one percent (1 %) to the Town of Oro Valley as an in -lieu fee. It shall be earmarked specifically for public artwork projects. 2. If the building permit valuation is ten million dollars ($10,000,000) or more, the owner may elect to contribute that portion of the one percent (1 %) over one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) to the Town of Oro Valley earmarked specifically for public artwork projects. 3. A portion of the one percent (1 %) may also be used to construct on -site performing art facilities used for and by the public for the promotion and production of the arts. 4. The Conceptual Design Review Board may determine that, due to remoteness of location, limited access, or any other cause that may prevent the required public artwork from fulfilling the intent of these provisions, the one percent (1%) monies be made as an in -lieu fee. 5. The in -lieu fees paid to the public art fund may be used for the maintenance of publicly owned artwork. 59 rdtd (0`�x;w c �j PERRY ENGINEERING 505 West Wetmore Road Tucson, AZ 85705 Phone: (520) 620-9870 www.perryengincering.net DRAINAGE STATEMENT: BIG HORN COMMERCE CENTER 11280 North Oracle Road, Tucson, AZ 85737 SECTION 05, T12S, R14E, G&SRM, Town of Oro Valley, Arizona PREPARED FOR BIG HORN COMMERCE CENTER, LLC 6650 North Oracle Road, Suite 100 Tucson, AZ 85704 F3m ..................... PREPARED BY: PERRY ENGINEERING 505 WEST WETMORE ROAD TUCSON, ARIZONA, 85705 PHONE: (520) 620-9870 AUGUST, 2016 REVISED FEBRUARY, 2017 pvnou°�� January 13, 2017 Town of Oro Valley Stormwater Utility ,ttn: Mr. Justin Turner 11000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 PERRY ENGINEERING JE: G1602254, (OV1205-23), COMMENT RESPONSE LETTER FOR 1st SUBMITTAL COMMENTS - BIG HORN COMMERCE CENTER DRAINAGE STATEMENT Tease consider this our comment response letter regarding the 1st review of the Drainage Statement for Big Horn Commerce Center. Responses are italicized. Comments from Justin Turner Stormwater Utility Drainage Report Comments Page 2 says "The hydrology from that Town accepted report (by JE Fulller) was assumed to still be valid for this interim condition, and is summarized." Revise this sentence to say you have reviewed this earlier report, and based on this, it is your professional opinion that the existing -conditions hydrologic and hydraulic calculations by JE Fuller (or whatever parts you want to reuse) are correct and that you affirm the technical accuracy and conformance of this previous engineering to the current minimum design standards and requirements of the Town of Oro Valley. If you believe this previous 10-year-old information does not meet current TOV standards, then it must be revised and updated. [TOV Zoning Code SEC.26.3-E.2] Response: The JEF report is no longer being used as a basis of information for this revised version of the Drainage Statement and Plans. We have supplied our own analysis that is now being presented in this Drainage Statement. Z. Page 2 says one of the purposes of the drainage statement was to "Ensure that the proposed embankment along the northeast edge of the subject parcel will feature the appropriate profile to protect the subject parcel from offsite flows." However, other than saying on page 3 that the existing embankment will be modified, or even revised again in the future, nothing was said about its purpose. Therefore, what is the purpose of this embankment? a) If it is to be a floodwall, then provide technical and administrative justification as described in CFR § 65.10 Levee Certification. b) If it is to be for erosion protection, then also show that the proposed erosion protection will withstand the anticipated hydraulic forces without failing or breaching. [DCM Sec 9.2, 10.3] Provide the with -project erosion -hazard building setback. [DCM Sec 10.5] c-) If it is to be for slope protection, give the design criteria. [TOV Zoning Code SEC. 27.9.E] 505 West Wetmore Road Tucson, Arizona 85705 Phone 520.620.9870 www.peMen ineerin net Page 1 Response: The embankment described in the first submittal of this Drainage Statement has been replaced by a floodwall. Please see Figure 4 in the Drainage Statement, and the current Development Plans for the alignment of this wall. The purpose of the wall is only to provide a sufficient volume for on -site storm water detention. This is stated near the bottom of Page 3. The purpose of the wall is not for any of the functions mentioned in items a), b), or c), above. 3. Page 2 says "Judging from the difference in water surface elevations observed between the existing (with embankment) and proposed (with floodwall) conditions in that report, which results in an increase of about 1.2 feet, it was considered a conservative estimate to increase the existing conditions water surface elevations for this interim condition by 0.5 feet." Please provide revised with -project hydraulic calculations for the North Channel to justify the proposed water -surface profile and hydraulic conditions. [DCM Sec. 5.3.4] Response: A new encroachment analysis has been completed to document the effect of the proposed floodwall and building pad embankment on the water surface profile in the ADOT right-of-way. It was found that the proposed improvements would have a negligible effect on water surface profiles and velocities in the ADOT right-of-way. 4. Figure 4 (with -project drainage map) says the 100-year CWSEL for cross section #2 is 2630.99 feet. This is the same CWSEL given by JE Fuller for existing conditions. a) What happened to the recommended with -project 0.5 foot rise in CWSELs? b) It also looks like the CWSEL at cross section #2 will overtop the downstream roadway at elevation 2628.0 feet and flow back into the subject property. Please evaluate this possible breakout situation. c) The CWSEL for cross section #2 is less than one foot lower than the FFE for the west building shown on JE Fuller's Site Plan used as the design concept for your grading plan. Please explain how the proposed embankment modifications will allow FFEs lower than the adjacent RFEs. [TOV Ordinance Sec. 17-5-8] Response: a) The water surface profile in the ADOT right-of-way has been revised per the HEC-RAS models included in the Drainage Statement. b) The CWSEL at the downstream roadway does overtop the roadway during the 100 year. event. The flow overtopping will not flow back onto the subject property under the proposed conditions, as that subject property will be raised and the roadway/driveway adjacent to the self -storage development (where storm water currently is conveyed) has more than sufficient capacity to convey the 100 year peak flow magnitude arriving there (63+/-- cfs). This is documented in the revised Drainage Statement. c) The FFEs are now shown at a minimum equal to the adjacent RFEs. 505 West Wetmore Road Tucson, Arizona 85705 Phone 520.620.9870 www.penengineering.net Page 2 5. Page 3 says "... it would seem that the proposed drainage conditions under proposed conditions of this site would be appropriate and acceptable." Revise this to affirm compliance with the TOV Drainage Criteria Manual and other Town of Oro Valley standards. [DCM 2.4.1, item 6] Response: This verbiage has been revised in the Conclusions section of the Drainage Statement. 6. Page 2 says "The reconstructed embankment alignment will encroach slightly into the Oracle Road right-of-way floodplain, thereby slightly squeezing the existing floodplain there ...." Because you are proposing changes to the drainage conditions in the public right -of- way, it is recommended that you coordinate this planned activity with ADOT. Response: We have coordinated with ADOT with this planned activity. Key individuals at ADOT are aware of this planned development, and they will perform an independent review of these plans and Drainage Statement. 7. Analyses for Scuppers. These calculations were based a maximum design flow depth of 0.5 feet and COT Equations 10.14 and 10.16a. These two equations assume the weir or orifice are not submerged. According to the hydraulic calculations for the downstream channel, the normal depth is 0.56 feet, which will submerge the scuppers. Please redo the calculations to account for tailwater, and revise Figure 4 and the Private Grading Plan, as needed. Response: A revised analysis of these scuppers, which accounts for the possibility of tailwater, has been performed. This is documented in Appendix B of the revised Drainage Statement. 8. Figure 4. Provide design calculations for the bank protection located midway along the east channel paralleling Rams Field Pass Road (Key Note #11). This channel segment has 2v:lh side slope, without giving information about design such as toedown. Response: Toedown for scour and D50 rock size was calculated, and documented in Appendix B of the revised Drainage Statement. The proposed bank protection will consist of D50=6" T=2D50 riprap with fabric, or gunnite. 100 year flow velocities are less than 3 ft/s. 9. Figure 4. Identify access into the east channel for maintenance. [DCM Sec. 5.4.a] Response: Access to the east channel, and to any other proposed drainage facility on the subject parcel, will be from the proposed parking lot. This is stated in the revised Drainage Statement on Page 5. 505 West Wetmore Road Tucson, Arizona 85705 Phone 520.620.9870 www.penyen ing eering.net Page 3 r ■ 10. Figure 4. Two retention basins are shown with 2h:ly side slopes and maximum design flow depths of 2.7 feet. Retention basins are not allowed. Please redesign them to provide free outflow. (DCM Sec. 11.3] Provide maintenance access. (DCM Sec. 11.6.1] Provide an inspection and maintenance plan. (DCM Sec. 11.6.5] Response: The detention scheme has been revised and documented in the report. Retention is not part of this scheme other than the 4 " water harvesting depth at the basin bottoms. An inspection and maintenance plan is provided on Page 5 of the revised Drainage Statement. 11. Apply for a Floodplain Use Permit. [TOV Ordinance Sec. 17-4-LB] Response: If this project proceeds to the construction phase, a Floodplain Use Permit will be obtained. Perry Engineering, LLC Ken Perry, PE, LEED AP Principal 505 West Wetmore Road Tucson, Arizona 85705 Phone 520.620.9870 www.perryengineering.net Page 4 February 13, 2017 Town of Oro Valley, Permitting Division 11000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley, AZ 85737 PERRY ENGINEERING RE: DRAINAGE STATEMENT Big Horn Commerce Center - 11278 N. Oracle Road — OV12-05-23 Introduction The subject parcel is approximately 3.0 acres in size, and zoned Commercial (C-1). It is located on the southeast side of North Oracle Road on unsubdivided land just southwest of North Rams Field Pass in the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona. The property is identified as assessor's parcel #220-04- 010P, and is surrounded on two sides by existing residential planned area developments (PADS), on another side by the Shurgard self storage facility, and on the fourth side by the Oracle Road right-of- way. The parcel is situated in the southwest quarter of Section 05, Township 12 South, Range 14 East. Please see Figure 1 — Location Map. The parcel is naturally vegetated, and currently features no improvements. Proposed development includes multiple commercial buildings with associated parking, drainage improvements, landscaping, and utility installations. This development will include placing fill material on the parcel to raise the elevations across the site, eliminating the existing earthen embankment on the northwest side of the parcel, and replacing that embankment with a floodwall through a portion of the parcel's frontage along Oracle Road. New scuppers will also be placed under new sidewalk on Rams Field Pass where there is currently a depressed curb opening. Downstream of these scuppers, a modified conveyance channel will be constructed. The subject parcel is not located within a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA), and is identified on FEMA panel 04019C 1090L, effective date June 16, 2011, as Zone X, being outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain, and in this case also outside the area shown as being protected from the 1 % flood hazard by the levee system on the nearby Canada del Oro Wash. Please see Figure 2 — FIRMette. Despite being outside a Federal SFHA, the Town of Oro Valley requires water harvesting and/or stormwater detention for new development, so a storm water detention system will be provided. The prevailing drainage pattern on the site is sheet flow (no defined watercourses) on the interior of the site, generally conveyed from northeast to southwest. Along the northeast and northwest sides of the subject parcel, there is concentrated flow conveyed in mostly earthen conveyance channels, which is generated in the adjacent Rams Canyon, Phases 1, 11, and 111, subdivisions (PADs). These concentrated flows do not enter the interior of the project site, but are conveyed around the northeast and northwest perimeter of the site. This Drainage Statement has been developed to support the engineering and site plan elements for this proposed development. Perry Engineering 505 West Wetmore Road, Tucson, AZ 85705 520-620-9870 Obiectives The purpose of this Drainage Statement is to: • Document existing and proposed conditions hydrology for the onsite and offsite areas impacting the project site. • Document the hydraulics of storm water runoff entering the proposed scuppers and conveyance channel on the southwest edge of Rams Field Pass. • Document the proposed storm water detention scheme on the developed conditions parcel. • Evaluate the situation regarding the existing and proposed conditions water surface profiles and erosion/scour protection along the Oracle Road frontage within the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) right-of-way. Discussion Hydrologic Analyses Contributing drainage areas were divided into onsite and offsite areas. For the onsite area, one drainage area has been delineated on the subject parcel. This drainage area includes the majority area of the subject parcel (2.73 acres), and has been labeled as 'ON I' on the Drainage Area Map (Figure 4). ON currently contributes discharges via sheet flow to the southwest edge of the subject parcel, which is labeled on Figure 4 as Concentration Point 1 (CPI). From CPI, this flow currently enters the Shurgard self storage facility. The ON1 drainage area was delineated using the 2015, 1-foot contour interval, LiDAR topographic information obtained from Pima Association of Governments (PAG), and supplemented by the proposed project grading scheme. This drainage area was analyzed under both existing and proposed conditions to determine the magnitudes of peak discharges and hydrograph volumes arriving at CPI. This information is necessary to determine the storm water detention scheme. There are two offsite drainage areas that impact the project site. The first is labeled as `OFF1', and includes portions of the Rams Canyon and Rams Canyon Phase III subdivisions to the northeast of the subject parcel. OFF] has its concentration point at the existing culvert group under Rams Field Pass consisting of 1-62"x40" CMPA and 4-24" HDPE culverts. The second offsite drainage area is labeled as `OFF2', and includes only a small portion of the Rams Canyon subdivision area — mostly portions of Rams Field Pass and Broken Rock Drive. OFF2 concentrates at the location of the proposed scuppers on Rams Field Pass. OFF1 and OFF2 will commingle within the ADOT right-of- way along the northwest boundary of the subject parcel. This Drainage Statement will utilize the rational method as presented in Chapter 3 of the Oro Valley Drainage Criteria Manual, 2010 Edition. A summary table of the hydrologic results can be found attached in Appendix A. Please also see the attached Figure 3. Perry Engineering 505 West Wetmore Road, Tucson, AZ 85705 520-620-9870 Offsite Drainage Scuppers on Rams Field Pass At the outfall of OFF2, coming from the Rams Canyon PAD onto North Rams Field Pass (See Figure 3), there is an existing sag condition in the Rams Field Pass roadway profile. Currently, there is a curb opening here to convey the offsite drainage from OFF2, but in the proposed condition, a sidewalk will be constructed with scuppers under that sidewalk. These scuppers are assumed to be per Standard Detail 205 featuring an opening width of 2.5 feet per scupper cell, and metal plates over the tops of each cell. An analysis determined that the number of such scupper cells required to keep the ponding depth below the curb height (0.5') during the 1% annual chance (100-year) event, is eight. Therefore, eight Standard Detail 205 scupper cells are proposed on the Grading Plan. The analysis for these scuppers includes consideration for potential tailwater in the downstream conveyance channel, and from the storm water flows downstream of that in the ADOT right-of-way adjacent to Oracle Road. Please see the scupper analysis contained in Appendix B. Conveyance Channel Adjacent to Rams Field Pass The proposed conveyance channel downstream of the scuppers will feature an earthen trapezoidal cross section with 4:1 side slopes, a bottom width that varies, but is about 13-feet shortly downstream of the scuppers, and a longitudinal slope of about 1.0%. Riprap erosion protection will be placed at the inlet and outfall locations of this channel as shown on the Grading Plan. The depth of flow while conveying the 100-year peak discharge of 16.1 cfs was determined to be just over 0.4 feet. The corresponding channel velocity was determined as about 2.7 ft/s. Please see the conveyance channel summary page contained in Appendix B. Conveyance and Water Surfaces in the ADOT Right -of -Way Drainage areas OFF1 and OFF2 were delineated, and 100-year peak discharges determined — combined 130 cfs. That combined peak discharge was utilized in the determination of flow conditions within the conveyance area located between the subject parcel boundary and Oracle Road — the ADOT right-of-way. The reach of the conveyance channel in this area is characterized by very mild longitudinal slopes, high relief on either side, and undersized culvert structures on both the upstream and downstream ends of this reach, which are the controlling factor of the flow conditions. An existing conditions U.S. Army Corps of Engineers HEC-RAS model was completed with the help of 2015 LiDAR topographic data and geometry information placed into the using the surface prepared in Civil3D. A starting water surface elevation was determined using the FHWA HY-8 culvert program. The resulting flow conditions were observed to be significantly influenced by the undersized downstream culvert, and reflect significant backwater effect and low velocities between 0.9 and 3.5 ft/s. Since it was known that a floodwall would be necessary in order to store enough onsite storm water to meet the detention requirement, and that this floodwall would encroach into the flow path of the ADOT right-of-way conveyance (although the floodwall would be located entirely within the subject parcel), a proposed conditions HEC-RAS model was developed to determine the effect of this prospective encroachment. It was found that those effects are negligible, and in -fact result in zero rise at each cross section in this conveyance reach except one, where it is 0.09 ft — within the normally allowable 0.1'. Changes in flow velocity are also negligible, never rising more than 10% Perry Engineering 505 West Wetmore Road, Tucson, AZ 85705 520-620-9870 more than the already very low velocities. Summaries of these HEC-RAS models, and a table of the encroachment analysis is included in Appendix B. A second HEC-RAS model was developed for the flow reach upstream of Rams Field Pass, between the ADOT right-of-way and the Rams Canyon III and II subdivisions. Results also show zero rise in this reach, but this is not included in Appendix B since there was no change in flow conditions for this upstream reach. Onsite Drainage Flow Conveyance Through the Site /Storm Water Detention Conveyance of storm water runoff generated on the subject parcel currently drains from east to west across the site, and is discharged as sheet flow to the un-named access drive along the southwest boundary of the site before being accepted by, and conveyed through, the existing self -storage facility to the southwest. The physical changes to the subject parcel to be completed as part of this interim project will change the flow patterns and flow magnitudes within this subject parcel. The changes to the subject parcel include regrading the conveyance channel along Rams Field Pass, eliminating the existing embankment, and replacing it with a floodwall, placing fill material on the interior of the site and compacting it, thereby raising it by various heights, but roughly 2-feet over the buildable area, vertical construction of two commercial structures, Paving, Landscaping, and utility work. The grading aspect of this project will include construction of four separate, but interconnected detention areas. Two of these areas are located parallel, and adjacent to the un-named roadway accessing the self storage facility to the southwest. A third area is located parallel to Oracle Road, although still within the subject parcel boundary (not ADOT right-of-way) between the embankment on the edge of the building area, and the proposed flood wall. The fourth area is underground storage pipes to be placed under the proposed parking lot at the northwest area of the parcel. It was determined that four pipes, 3-feet in diameter and 150 feet long each, would be necessary to supplement the other three open basins. These detention areas will all be connected by pipes, and are expected to act as essentially one larger basin during infrequent events. Outlets from this one larger basin include a long and irregularly shaped weir along the north sidewalk of the un-named self storage access road, a 12-inch orifice in the floodwall with a flap gate (in order to provide one way flow only, as flows in the ADOT right-of-way will be higher than this elevation during infrequent events), and another flap gated weir at a particular elevation and length in the floodwall. This third outlet was analyzed as a weir in the PC -Route spreadsheet program, but will take the form of 4-12-- inch diameter round openings at that same elevations because a flap gate with the dimensions of the rectangular weir may be difficult to find and/or expensive. Care was taken to ensure that there will be a similar flow area in these round openings, which will effectively act as a weir, as in the rectangular weir appearing as an outlet in the PC -Route spreadsheet. The supporting documentation of this detention routing exercise is included in Appendix B. Treatment of the first flush volume from the onsite drainage area will be accomplished by an in -line filtration system. Such a system will treat essentially all of the onsite storm water runoff, as the entire onsite hydrograph will be conveyed to one of the proposed interconnected detention basins by grates placed at the sump locations in the parking lot. The filtration system will likely be the Clear Water Solutions BMP Unit or the United Storm Water Drop Inlet Storm Drain Filter, or approved equal. Perry Engineering 505 West Wetmore Road, Tucson, AZ 85705 520-620-9870 Maintenance of these filtration units will be the responsibility of the property owner, and will be per the manufacturer's recommendations at a minimum. Access to the proposed conveyance and detention facilities for the purpose of maintenance will be provided from the parking area of the development. Maintenance workers will be able to park vehicles and stage equipment within the proposed parking area, and safely access the various facilities on foot. Hand tools can also be carried into any of the drainage facilities. The proposed basins for this project should be inspected a minimum of once per year, and following significant storm events. The inspection and maintenance should include, but not necessarily be limited to the following: Ensure flow paths into and out of the basins are unobstructed, and undamaged, Ensure basin depths and volume capacities are not compromised by trash, debris, sediment, vegetation, or other items, Ensure that basins drain or infiltrate within 24 hours of storm events, Ensure that basin side and bottom slopes remain as constructed, Ensure any landscaping is maintained, Ensure that the outlet locations are not experiencing undue erosion or other impacts. Any issues found during inspections should be remedied upon discovery. Flow Conveyance Downstream of the Site During infrequent events, storm water can find its way onto the un-named roadway accessing the Shurgard self -storage facility. This could be from the offsite storm water overtopping this roadway at the downstream culvert in the ADOT right-of-way conveyance (calculated 100-year peak flow of 57 cfs), or from the onsite storm water spilling over the previously discussed sidewalk weir along that un-named roadway (calculated 100-year peak flow of 6 cfs). A combined 100-year peak flow of 63 cfs can be assumed. To ensure that these flows on this un-named roadway will not back up into the subject parcel, a cross section was taken, again using the LiDAR in Civil3D, and a Manning's calculation performed to determine the limiting flow capacity in the driveway into the self storage facility, where storm water currently is conveyed. It was found that the resulting water surface elevation for 63 cfs is below the curb elevations, so storm water should not have a tendency to back up onto the subject parcel. Scour at the Proposed Floodwall and in Channel Adjacent to Rams Field Pass A scour analysis was completed for the proposed floodwall, using the hydraulic information from the proposed conditions HEC-RAS model. Results were that anticipated scour depths range between 1.3 feet and 1.6 feet, which includes a 1.3 factor of safety. Toedown depths of about 2 feet should be sufficient for scour. This wall will be a retaining wall for stormwater, and will need to be designed by others to withstand sliding and overturning due to the anticipated storm water loads. This wall will not necessarily meet the requirements of CFR 65.10 for Federal levee certification. Additionally, there is potential scour within the proposed conveyance channel adjacent to Rams Field Pass. The cross section taken at the utility boxes, where there is bank protection proposed on the 2:1 slope was examined as a location where toedown may be necessary. After going through the same calculation as for the floodwall, a scour depth of 2 feet was determined for this bank protection. This was based on an assumed, and conservative, energy slope of 0.1%, even though the ground slope is 1.0%. This is because this location is subject to inundation from the flow a short distance downstream at the ADOT right-of-way confluence. An energy slope of 0.1% results in a calculated Perry Engineering 505 West Wetmore Road, Tucson, AZ 85705 520-620-9870 scour depth of 2 feet (with safety factor), whereas a slope of 1 % results in a scour depth of about 1.5 feet. Therefore, a scour depth of 2.0 feet should be sufficient for this location. At the upstream location of this conveyance channel, the channel will be fully lined with either 6" D50 riprap with fabric, or with gunnite. For the segment of this channel where the north side slope is 2:1 instead of 4:1, that 2:1 slope will also be protected with riprap or gunnite. If riprap is used at one or both of those locations, a D50 of 6" was determined from Figure 9 in the City of Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design (included in Appendix B). Although this chart is supposed to be for riprap on slopes 3:1 or flatter, the 100-year maximum velocity of 2.9 ft/s results in a determined D50 of about 0.1 feet, so using 6" stone on this proposed 2:1 slope should still be more than sufficient. Summary and Conclusion This Drainage Statement documents the existing and proposed drainage conditions on and around the subject parcel #220-04-010P at the southwest corner of the Oracle Road / N. Rams Field Pass intersection in the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona. There are several physical changes to the property proposed including raising the site by about 2 feet, grading, vertical construction, paving, landscape, and utilities, that will require drainage infrastructure to also be included. Hydrology calculations were performed to determine peak discharges. New scuppers, and a regraded conveyance channel were evaluated to carry offsite storm water runoff from a small portion of the Rams Canyon III subdivision. An encroachment analysis was completed along the ADOT right-of- way to verify an acceptable difference in water surface rise and flow velocity increase due to the proposed flood wall. Due to the fact that under the proposed conditions at this site, flooding conditions in the general area will not be intensified, nor the prevailing flow patterns altered. Detention facilities were designed such that there is no increase in peak discharges from the site during the 2-, 10-, and 100-year events. It was verified that the conveyance capacity of the downstream storm water path is sufficient to preclude accumulated discharges downstream of the site from backing up into the development. Finally, scour depths along the base of the proposed flood were determined to be less than 2 feet at all locations. Therefore, it is affirmed that the project design substantially complies with the Town of Oro Valley Drainage Criteria Manual, and with Oro Valley development standards generally. If you should have any questions, or desire further explanation, please contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, ETH D. Ken Perry, PE, LEED AP ((0—(::3'4"' ERRY1312017. Perry Engineering, LLC \\ \ate Expires: 9/30/17 Perry Engineering 505 West Wetmore Road, Tucson, AZ 85705 520-620-9870 REFERENCES Brater, Ernest Frederick and King, Horace Williams, Handbook of Hydraulics, Sixth Edition, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1976. City of Tucson Department of Transportation, Engineering Division, Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management in Tucson, Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, December 1989, Revised July, 1998. Onlinechanne115.php, Discharge in a Prismatic Channel Using Manning's Equation, http://onlinecalc.sdsu.edu/onlinechanne115.php, San Diego State University. Town of Oro Valley Department of Public Works, Drainage Criteria Manual, 2010 Edition, Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (2002), Revised DMA Engineering, LLC (2010), Oro Valley, Arizona, February, 2010. Perry Engineering 505 West Wetmore Road, Tucson, AZ 85705 520-620-9870 FIGURES r PAD CATALINA R l ORO VALLEY STATE PARK ORO VALLEY QED ORO eVALLEY PROJECT 50RAMSP�NYON 'Pq 0ORO VALLEY ORO 6 5 s� �o STEAM PUMP OV ogss RANCH H NEYWELL �T �oPo PI A COUNTY l� UNS PAD IDED o �2 ORO VALLEY SCALE: 3"=1 MILE a LOCATION MAP A PORTION OF THE S. W. 114 OF SECTION 5 TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 14 EAST GILA & SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PIMA COUNTY, AZ SCALE. • 3"=1 MILE Figure 1 - Location Map ■ I 4: N ;MOON u) rn CD J W Z Q . a W Z_ O 3587'0.N -&ZONE X ?ONE X 2636 263•�;263 14. '!- .,, ZONE Pima County Unincorporated Area ss 040073 Levee Bndge 35 OOOm 86 N Project Site Pima County • t j`aS C' _ e�,tiM t Unincorporated A 040073 PL :,. 505000.,E ON-FLORENCE 11GHWAY Note: This area is shown as being protected from the 1-percent-annual-chance or greater flood hazard by a levee system. Overtopping or failure of any levee system is possible. For additional information, see the Accredited Levee Note in Notes to Users. )nai HOWnsurance Frogram a . 4 MAP SCALE 1" = 1000' 1 0 1000 2000 FEET METER m PANEL 1090L FIRM a 0 FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP ® PIMA COUNTY, m ARIZONA m AND INCORPORATED AREAS PANEL 1090 OF 4750 (SEE MAP INDEX FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT) C CONTAINS: COMMUNITY NUMBER PANEL SUFFIX Trn ORO VALLEY. TOWN OF 040109 1090 L PIMA COUNTY 040073 1090 L ® Notice to User The Map Number shown below should be ® used when placing rrep atlas: the Community Number shown above should be used on insurance applications for the subject -unity. MAP NUMBER oEQ^Fti a 04019C1090L MAP REVISED JUNE 16, 2011 M Federal Emergency Management Agenc} I _1/ This is an official copy of a portion of the above referenced flood map. It was extracted using F-MIT On -Line. This map does not reflect changes or amendments which may have been made subsequent to the date on the title block. For the latest product information about National Flood Insurance Program flood maps check the FEMA Flood Map Store at wywy,msc.fema.gov Figure 2 - Excerpt of Current Flood Insurance Rate Map - FIRMette I.% � Pr 4- rll:l Zol gool E.A.15 y1'i� ;9^^�• ,,,,,,���rrr/.f 2� ��'.ta �.tr,.. �"^,. ���� .�-�c�� '.A. ,';�i, .5,.3•/-.r` ,•,r,' � '��'�;_"� � r ,--�.•�T.,: Op, -IVI, I�X rm: rN . . . . . . . . . . . . a - - Detention Are 4 PUBLIC � HEC-RAS Cross Sections _ -ABLE RO?7)-�� - - (STATE ROU1E 4 - 3' Diamete 150' Storage g Pipes p N -- - -- _ ADor R/ yy PROJECT -1-813 — _ � DWG D- I OT-342 5 _- -- y _ v � q SCALE. 1 `=30' C1.=os Rectangular Weir Outlet A Low Flow Outlet I 01 ^ lI I o `O A OT Right -of Nay O - - -[ - 1 � 1 D4�8.5AC 1 fs N Q100=130 cis w DA=20.6 - r Prop sed Floodw II BOTTOM 627.0 I' -- ETEN170N AREA 3 -------- / Constructed Conveyance Channel I 41�1 "IOM EL 2627.0 I I I t 1 I - a ' - W THRU z EXISTING ROADWAY WEIR ¢ S PPERS Q7 0=16.icfs N Yo BOTTOM ELEV.� 2627.3 o � I 17 - — , 1 I� RAMS PASS II II DP BOOK 59 MAP PAGE 70 Figure 4 - Drainage Facilities Map �O 9 HAND PLACED RO RIP —RAP OVER FILTER FABRIC, D50=6'; 12" THII OR GUNNITE Channel Throat Hydraulic Cross Section 2' PROP, SIDEWALK SCUPPERS PER PC/COT STD. 205 TOC=3.3.31 G= 32.6400, /CO q'�p 3r51_ 34.0 SAW —CUT REMOVE & REPLACE MIN. OF 1 FT. BY 22 LF INTO EXIST. PAVEMENT TO PROVIDE UNIFORM CONSTRUCTION JOINT. 9s s TOC=33.J7 _'PQ� t �� , G= 32. 65 Q BARRICADE RAILING EXIST. CONC. VERTICAL CURB \ 51 NEW 3CONC. SIDEWALK 6-NEW SIDEWALK SCUPPERS PER PC/COT STD. DTL. 205 (SIDEWALK SUPPER TYPE 2) NTS Figure 5 - Scupper Detail APPENDIX A HYDROLOGY SUMMARY Hydrologic Analyses for Big Horn Commerce Center Per Section 3.3 of Oro Valley Drainage Criteria Manual, 2010 Edition A = Drainage Area (acres) P, = 1-Hour Rainfall Depth (From Table 3-2 in Oro Valley Drainage Criteria Manual, 2010 Edition) L� = Length of the Watercourse to the Hydraulically Most Distant Point (mi) Kb = Watershed Resistance Coefficient (Table 2-1 in ADOT Highway Drainage Design Manual - Hydrology (January 2014) S = Slope of Longest Flow Path, Lc, (ft/mi) Tp = Time of Concentration (hrs), Tc = 11.4Lco.5Kti .52s-0.97i-0.38 Papadakis Equation I = Average Rainfall Intensity for a Duration of Rainfall Equal to To (Minimum Tc is 5 minutes) Use Figure 3-3 of Oro Valley Drainage Criteria Manual, 2010 Edition (Town of Oro Valley Generalized IDF Curves) C = Runoff Coefficient (Table 3-3 of Oro Valley Drainage Criteria Manual, 2010 Edition, C Coefficients for use with the Rational Method) Qp100 = 100-Year Peak Discharge (ft3/s), Qploo = CiA Onsite Hydrology Existina Conditions at ON1 Return Period A P, Lc Kb Relief S I Tc C Qploo Notes (Years) (acres) (in) (mi) (ft) (fUmi) (in/hr) (hr) (ft'/s) 100 2.73 2.77 0.091 0.10 6.0 65.9 8.30 0.127 0.61 13.8 Primarily Sheet Flow 25 2.73 2.22 0.091 0.10 6.0 65.9 7.60 0.131 0.50 10.4 Primarily Sheet Flow 10 2.73 1.87 0.091 0.10 6.0 65.9 5.40 0.149 0.43 6.3 Primarily Sheet Flow 5 2.73 1.62 0.091 0.10 6.0 65.9 4.80 0.156 0.35 4.6 Primarily Sheet Flow 2 2.73 1.26 0.091 0.10 6.0 65.9 3.80 0.171 0.24 2.5 Primarily Sheet Flow Proposed Conditions at ON1 Return Period A P, Lp Kb Relief S I Tc C QPtoo Notes (Years) (acres) (in) (mi) (ft) (fUmi) (in/hr) (hr) (ft'/s) 100 2.73 2.77 0.123 0.02 5.2 42.3 9.90 0.0685 0.92 24.9 Default to I at T,= 5 min on Fig 3-3 25 2.73 2.22 0.123 0.02 5.2 42.3 8.20 0.0736 0.90 20.1 Default to I at T,= 5 min on Fig 3-3 10 2.73 1.87 0.123 0.02 5.2 42.3 6.90 0.0786 0.88 16.6 Default to I at T,= 5 min on Fig 3-3 5 2.73 1.62 0.123 0.02 5.2 42.3 6.10 0.0824 0.87 14.5 Default to I at T,= 5 min on Fig 3-3 2 2.73 1.26 0.123 0.02 5.2 42.3 4.90 0.0895 0.84 11.2 Offsite Hydrology Existinq and Proposed Conditions at OFF1 Return Period A P, Lp Kb Relief S I T. C Qp1D0 Notes (Years) (acres) (in) (mi) (ft) (ft/mi) (in/hr) (hr) (ft'/s) 100 18.51 2.77 0.473 0.025 25.0 52.9 8.00 0.153 0.77 114.0 Existinq and Proposed Conditions at OFF2 Return Period A P, Lp Kb Relief S I T. C Oploo Notes (Years) (acres) (in) (mi) (ft) (ft/mi) (in/hr) (hr) (ft°/s) 100 2.11 2.77 0.114 0.025 5.0 43.9 9.90 0.073 0.77 16.1 Default to I at T,= 5 min on Fig 3-3 10 2.11 1.87 0.114 0.025 5.0 43.9 6.80 0.085 0.66 9.5 3.3 Rational Equation The rational equation has long been used by engineers as a simplified method to develop an estimate for flood peaks. The method itself continues to be widely used for roadway drainage and flow peaks from small watersheds. The Town of Oro Valley limits the use of the rational equation to areas no larger than 100 acres in size. The basic rational equation is in the form of: Where: Q=CiA Q = Flow rate in cubic feet per second C = Runoff Coefficient; see Table 3-3. i = Rainfall intensity at Time of Concentration, see Figure 3-3: Town of Oro Valley Generalized I-D-F Curves and use T, = total Rainfall Duration in the I-D-F curve. Minimum Tc shall be 5 minutes or greater. A = Drainage area in acres The weighted runoff coefficient will be estimated by: Where: Cw = j"AnCn �n C,,,= Weighted C Cn = Runoff coefficient for sub -area "n", see Table 3-3 A = Area for sub -area "n" Table 3-2: Rainfall Depths of Various Return Periods for Oro Valley Site -Specific 1-D-F Curves Return Period (Years) Rainfall Depths (inches) 1-Hour (Pd 2-Hour 3-Hour 2 1.26 1.37 1.45 5 1.62 1.79 1.91 10 1.87 2.08 2.23 25 2.22 2.49 2.67 50 2.49 2.80 3.01 100 2.77 3.12 3.35 500 3.39 3.84 4.14 Drainage Criteria Manual 18 February 2010 Town of Oro Valley HIGHWAY DRAINAGE DESIGN MANUAL CHAPTER 2 VOLUME 2 - HYDROLOGY RATIONAL METHOD CoefficientTable 2-1 Resistance MethodRational Tc Equation Description of Landform Kb Defined Drainage Network Overland Flow Only Mountain, with forest and dense ground cover (average slopes — 50% or greater) 0.15 0.30 Mountain, with rough rock and boulder cover (average slopes — 50% or greater) 0.12 0.25 Foothills (average slopes — 10% to 50%) 0.10 0.20 Alluvial fans, Pediments and Rangelands (average slopes —10% or less) 0.05 0.10 Irrigation Pastures a - 0.20 Tilled Agricultural Fields a - 0.08 URBAN Residential, L is less than 1,000 ftb 0.04 Residential, L is greater than 1,000 ftb 0.025 Grass, parks, cemeteries, etc. a - 0.20 Bare ground; playgrounds, etc. a - 0.08 Paved; parking lots, etc. a - 0.02 Notes: a — No defined drainage network. b — L is length in T, equation. Streets serve as drainage network. /ON1 (Existing) Offsite Areas ON 1 (Proposed) The solution for T, using Equation 2.2 is an iterative process, since the determination of (i) requires the knowledge of the value of T, Therefore, Equation 2.2 will be solved by a successive approximation procedure. After L, Kb, and S are estimated and after the appropriate I-D-F graph is selected or prepared, a value for T, will be estimated (a trial value) and (i) will be read from the I-D-F graph for the corresponding value of duration equivalent to T, That (i) will be used in Equation 2.2 and T, will be calculated. If the calculated value of T, does not equal the trial value of T,, then the process is repeated until the calculated and trial values of T, are acceptably close (a difference of less than one minute is acceptable). The Rational Method should not be used if the calculated T, is greater than 60 minutes. The ADOT Rational Method Tool can be used to perform the computation. 2.2.5 Selection of Runoff Coefficient (C) The runoff coefficient (C) is selected from Figure 2-1 through Figure 2-6 depending on the watershed characteristics. Figure 2-1 is the C graph to be used for urbanized (developed) watersheds. Select the appropriate curve in Figure 2-1 based on an estimate of the percent of effective impervious area in the watershed. Effective impervious area is that area that will drain January 2014 Page: 2-5 A. Internodal Transportaion 2-Year 5-Year 10-Year 25-Year 100-Year Onsite Existing Conditions Table 3-3: C Coefficients for Use with the Rational Method Onsite Proposed Conditions Intensity of Landuse* Rainf all Depth in Applicable Soil Types (_<l0%) Nat./Rural (20%) Suburban (40%) Mod Urban (70%) Hly. Urban (9010) CommlInd. Pl B C D I B C D B C D B C D B C D B C D 0.9 .02 .09 .16 .88 .11 .17 .23 .19 .25 .30 .36 .41 .45 .62 .64 .66 .79 .80 .81 1.0 .05 .14 .22 .89 .13 .22 .29 .22 .29 .35 .3 9 .44 .49 .64 .67 .69 .81 .82 .82 1.1 .09 .19 .28 .90 .17 .26 .34 .25 .33 .40 .41 .47 .53 .66 .69 .71 .82 .83 .84 1.2 .12 .23 .33 .91 .20 .30 .39 .28 .37 .45 .44 .50 .56 .67 .71 .74 .83 .84 .85 1.3 .16 1 .28 .38 1 .91 1 .24 .34 .43 .31 .41 .49 .46 .53 1 .59 1 .69 .72 1 .75 1 .84 .85 1 .86 1.4 .20 .32 .42 .92 .27 .38 .47 .34 .44 .52 .49 .56 .62 .70 .74 .77 .85 .86 .87 1.5 .24 .37 .46 .92 .31 .43 .51 .38 .48 .55 .51 .59 .64 .72 .76 .78 .85 .87 .87 1.6 .28 .40 .50 .93 .35 .45 .54 .41 .51 .59 .54 .61 .67 .74 .77 .80 .87 .88 .89 1.7 .31 .44 .53 .93 .37 .49 .57 .43 .54 .61 .56 .64 .69 .74 .78 .81 .87 .88 .89 1.8 .34 .47 .56 .94 .40 .52 .60 .46 .56 .64 .58 .66 .71 .76 .80 .83 .88 .89 .90 1.9 .37 .50 .59 .94 .43 .54 .63 .48 .59 .66 .60 .68 .73 .77 .81 .84 .88 .90 .91 2.0 .40 .53 .62 .94 .45 .57 .65 .51 .61 .68 .62 .69 .75 .78 .82 .84 .89 .90 .91 2.1 .43 .55 .64 .94 .48 .59 .67 .53 .63 .70 .63 .71 .76 .79 .82 .85 .89 .91 .91 2.2 .45 .57 .66 .95 .50 .61 .69 .55 .65 .72 .65 .72 .78 .80 .84 .86 .90 .91 .92 2.3 .47 .59 .68 .95 .52 .63 .71 .57 .66 .73 .66 .73 .79 .81 .84 .87 .90 .91 .92 2.4 .50 .61 .69 .95 .55 .64 .72 .59 .68 .74 .68 .75 .79 .82 .85 .87 .91 .92 .92 2.5 .52 .63 .71 .95 .56 .66 .73 .61 .69 .76 .69 .76 .81 .82 .85 .88 .91 .92 1 .93 2.6 .53 .65 .72 .95 .57 .68 .74 .61 .71 .77 .70 .77 .81 .82 .86 .88 .91 .92 .93 2.7 .55 .66 .74 .96 .59 .69 .76 .63 .72 .78 .71 .78 .83 .84 .87 .89 .92 .93 .94 2.8 .57 .68 .75 .96 .61 .71 .77 .65 .74 .79 .73 .79 .83 .84 .88 .90 .92 .93 .94 2.9 .58 .69 .76 .96 .62 .72 .78 .66 .74 .80 .73 .84 .85 .89 .90 .92 .93 .94 3.0 .60 .70 .77 .96 .64 .73 .79 .67 .75 .81 .74 .80 .8 5 .90 .92 .93 .94 Where: PI = One -hour rainfall depth for the desired return period B = Type "B" soils (NRCS Classification) C =Type "C soils (NRCS Classification) D = Type "D" soils (NRCS Classification) I = Impervious surface *Percent in parentheses represents amount of impervious cover. W Offsite Areas Interpolated to I = 50% (Below) Note: Table 3-3 from "Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management in Tucson, Arizona" Cw=C1 +((C2- Cl) /(11-12))'((Iw-11)=0.73+((0.84-0.73)/(0.70-0.40))`(0.50-0.40)=0.77 Drainage Criteria Manual Town of Oro Valley 19 February 2010 Figure 3-3: Town of Oro Valley Generalized I-D-F Curves 100.00 - i ' I I 10.00 ca A0 W Q FR L C 1.00 C - 41.1 - - C 500 .. 100 5 25 0 10 `0..1`0- - 5 --- �- 2 i Vt- 0.011 OFF21 � 0.01 0.1 OFF1 1 10 100 Rainfall Duration (hours) Onsite Drainage Area Not Shown to Avoid Crowding Drainage Criteria Manual 23 February 2010 Town of Oro Valley APPENDIX B HYDRAULICS SUMMARY • Scuppers on Rams Field Pass • Conveyance Channel Adjacent to Rams Field Pass • HEC-RAS Models in ADOT Right -of -Way • Detention Routing • Hydraulic Cross Section at Shurgard Self Storage • Scour Analysis and Rock Sizing Scuppers on Rams Field Pass Analyses for Scuppers Scuppers In Sag From Equations 10.14 and 10.16a in City of Tucson Standards Manual: and Followinq Guidance in City of Delta. CO. Stormwater Design Manual for Submerged Weirs Y, = (Q / 2.3 L)� Weir Equation (COT Eqn. 10. 14) Y, = (Q / 5.35 A)=+ h/2 Orifice Equation (COT Eqn. 10.16a) Where: YI = Depth at Lip of Curb Inlet, (ft) QI = Rate of Discharge Into the Curb Inlet, (fP/s) L = Legth of Curb Inlet, (ft) In = Height of Curb Inlet Orifice, (ft) See Following Page for Submerged Weir Information Inlet Elevation = 2532.65 Tailwater in Downstream Conveyance Channel = 2632.94 12.8 BW Channel 10-Year 100-Year No. Scuppers Width of Height of Curb Opening Orifice Opening Pavement Drainage Area Concentration Point Discharge Discharge Provided per Curb Inlet Orifice Curb Inlet Orifice Length Provided Area Provided Cross Slope (S.) (cfs) (cfs) Std. Dtl. 205 (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) N Offsite Area 2 OFF2 (Scupper along NE Property Line) 9.5 16.1 8 2.5 0.5 20.0 10.00 2.0 Weir Equation Orifice Equation Weir Equation Orifice Equation Continued 10-Year 10-Year 100-Year 100-Year 10-Year 100-Year Controlling 10-Year 100-Year Drainage Area Concentration Point Ponding Depth Ponding Depth Ponding Depth Ponding Depth Wdth of Spread Width of Spread Ponding Depth Ponding Elevation Ponding Elevation (in) (in) (in) (in) (ft) (ft) (in) (ft) (ft) Cffsite Area 2 OFF2 (Scupper along NE Property Line) 4.19 3.38 5.96 4.09 17.47 24.63 5.96 2633.00 2633.15 Continued Submerged Weir Drainage Area Concentration Point H1 H2 H2/H1 Submerged Weir Discharge (ft) (ft) (dim) (Y or N) (cfs) Cffsite Area 2 OFF2 (Scupper along NE Property Line) 0.50 0.29 0.58 N 12.82 Alternate Alternate Alternate Continued - Only in the Case of a Submeraed Weir 100-Year 100-Year 100-Year Submerged Weir Discharge (Q100) Drainage Area Concentration Point Ponding Elevation— Ponding Depth Ponding Depth"" H1 H2 H2/H1 Submerged Weir Discharge Check••"• (ft) (ft) (in) (ft) (ft) (dim) (Y or N) (cfs) (cfs) Offsite Area 2 OFF2 (Scupper along NE Property Line) 2533.29 0.64 7.63 0.64 0.29 0.45 N n/a 23.55 • Calculated per Rational Method in Chapter 3 of Ora Valley Drainage Design Criteria Manual, 2010 Ed Mon "6-inches is considered the maximum acceptable ponding depth Set High Enough Such That H2/H7 is Just Less Than 0.66 per City of Delta, CO, St-ater Design Manual. and Free Discharge WIl Govern "'• Must be Greater Than Submerged Conditions Ponding Depth (Above) "' Back Calculate Discharge via Weir Equation to See if it Equals or Exceeds the Calculated 100-year Peak Discharge of 16.1 cfs FREE DISCHARGE • 1F H2 10.2 HI, TREAT THE WEIR AS THOUGH IT HAD FREE DISCHARGE (Merritt) • IF H2 10.66 HI, TREAT A BROAD -CRESTED WEIR AS THOUGH IT HAD FREE DISCHARGE (Merritt) • IF D < 0.85 (P+HI), TREAT A SHARP CRESTED WEIR AS THOUGH IT HAD FREE DISCHARGE (Mo rftt) • FOR D > Ohs (P+Hl). REDUCE SHARP -CRESTED WEIR. CAPACITY BY THE EQUATION BELOW (APWA). IT MAY BE REASONABLE TO USE THE SAME EQUATION TO CALCULATE BROAD -CRESTED CAPACITY FOR H2 > 0.66 HI. Qa.. aw„�� T ' ((BraW & King. Un&td uM) SUBMERGED FREE DISCHARGE & SUBMERGED WEIRS FIGURE K-5 Conveyance Channel Adjacent to Rams Field Pass PROJ: Big Horn Commerce Center DETAIL: Manning's Rating for Irregular Section Section: Throat of Channel Adjacent to Rams Field Pass Solution is for Manning's Equation for each section segment as follows: Q = VA = 1.49 RhA2/3 S^1 /2 A n Calculation of discharge is for an assumed water surface elevation (WSEL) and given slope (SLOPE): Number of Points in Section = 5.00 ASSUMED WSEL= 2632.95 SLOPE = 0.0100 POINT STATION ELEV In" A WP Rh V D T Q Fr # (FT) (FT) value (sq. ft) (feet) (feet) (ft/sec) (feet) (feet) (cfs) (dim) 1 92.00 2633.30' 2 102.80 2633.20 0.032 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 3 102.80 2632.50 0.032 0.00 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 #DIV/0! 4 115.60 2632.50 0.032 5.70 12.80 0.45 2.71 0.45 12.8 15.4 0.19 5 118.00 2633.10 0.032 0.40 1.83 0.22 1.67 0.45 1.8 0.7 0.12 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 TOTAL SECTION VALUES = 6.09 15.08 0.40 2.64 14.6 16.1 Legend: "n" = Manning's roughness coefficient A = flow area WP = wetted perimeter Rh = hydraulic radius V = flow velocity D = flow depth T = topwidth Q = discharge NOTES: Segment Q shown is for segment between indicated point and previous point "Total" Section value for V (velocity) is average for entire section Throat of Channel Adjacent to Rams Field Pass 2635.00 — -- ------------ 2634.50 - 2634.00 -� �, 2633.50 2633.00 eil --.. - --- ------4.1 w —. — - - - ---- 2632.50 f - 2632.00 — 2631.50 - 2631.00 95.00 100.00 105.00 110.00 115.00 120.00 125.00 Station (feet) PROJ: Big Horn Commerce Center DETAIL: Manning's Rating for Irregular Section Section: Channel Adjacent to Rams Field Pass at Utility Boxes Solution is for Manning's Equation for each section segment as follows: Q = VA = 1.49 Rh^2/3 S^1 /2 A n Calculation of discharge is for an assumed water surface elevation (WSEL) and given slope (SLOPE): Number of Points in Section = 5.00 ASSUMED WSEL= 2631.85 SLOPE = 0.0100 POINT STATION ELEV W. A WP Rh V D T Q Fr # FT (FT) value (sq. ft) (feet feet (ft/sec) (feet) (feet) cfs) (dim) 1 92.00 2633.30 2 100.00 2633.20 0.032 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 3 107.40 2631.35 0.032 0.50 2.07 0.24 1.81 0.50 2.0 0.9 0.11 4 117.40 2631.35 0.032 5.02 10.00 0.50 2.93 0.50 10.0 14.7 0.18 5 119.40 2632.35 0.032 0.25 1.12 0.22 1.72 0.50 1.0 0.4 0.11 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 TOTAL SECTION VALUES = 5.78 13.19 0.44 2.78 13.0 16.1 Legend: "n" = Manning's roughness coefficient A = flow area WP = wetted perimeter Rh = hydraulic radius V = flow velocity D = flow depth T = topwidth Q = discharge NOTES: Segment Q shown is for segment between indicated point and previous point "Total" Section value for V (velocity) is average for entire section Channel Adjacent to Rams Field Pass at Utility Boxes 2634.00 1- 2633.50 i 2633.00 - ,� 2632.50 m m c 2632.00 > a� w 2631.50 - - 2631.00 2630.50 ----- --- 2630.00 95.00 100.00 105.00 110.00 115.00 120.00 125.00 Station (feet) HEC-RAS Models in ADOT Right -of -Way HEC-RAS Version 4.1.0 Jan 2010 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center 609 Second Street Davis, California Existing Conditions Model X X xxxxxx XXXX XXXX XX XXXX X X X X x X X X X X X X X X x X X x x XXXXXXX XXXX X XXX xxxx XXXXXX XXXX x X X X X x X X X X x X X X x x X X x X X xxxxxx Xxxx X X X X XXXXX PROJECT DATA Project Title: Big Horn Commerce Center Project File : BigHornCC.prj Run Date and Time: 1/31/2017 3:51:08 PM Project in English units PLAN DATA Plan Title: Big Horn CC Existing No Containment Plan File : F:\Perry Engineering\16017 - Big Horn Commerce Center\Drainage\HECRAS\BigHornCC.p01 Geometry Title: Big Horn CC Existing Geometry File : F:\Perry Engineering\16017 - Big Horn Commerce Center\Drainage\HECRAS\BigHornCC.g01 Flow Title Big Horn CC Existing Flow File F:\Perry Engineering\16017 - Big Horn Commerce Center\Drainage\HECRAS\BigHornCC.f01 Plan Summary Information: Number of: Cross Sections = 7 Multiple Openings = 0 Culverts = 0 Inline Structures = 0 Bridges = 0 Lateral Structures = 0 Computational Information Water surface calculation tolerance = 0.01 Critical depth calculation tolerance = 0.01 Maximum number of iterations = 20 Maximum difference tolerance = 0.3 Flow tolerance factor = 0.001 Computation Options Critical depth computed only where necessary Conveyance Calculation Method: At breaks in n values only Friction Slope Method: Average Conveyance Computational Flow Regime: Subcritical Flow ************************************************************************* FLOW DATA Flow Title: Big Horn CC Existing Flow File : F:\Perry Engineering\16017 - Big Horn Commerce Center\Drainage\HECRAS\BigHornCC.f01 Flow Data (cfs) ************************************************************* * River Reach RS * PF 1 * * ADOT ROW Alignment - (1) 7 * 130 * ************************************************************* Boundary Conditions ************************************************************************* ******************************* * River Reach Profile * Upstream Downstream ************************************************************************* ******************************* * ADOT ROW Alignment - (1) PF 1 Known WS = 2630.5 ************************************************************************* ******************************* ************************************************************************* ******* SUMMARY OF MANNING'S N VALUES River:ADOT ROW ***************************************************************** * Reach * River Sta. * nl * n2 * n3 ***************************************************************** *Alignment - (1) * 7 * .035* .05* .035* *Alignment - (1) * 6 * .035* .05* .035* *Alignment - (1) * 5 * .035* .05* .035* *Alignment - (1) * 4 * .035* .05* .035* *Alignment - (1) * 3 * .035* .05* .035* *Alignment - (1) * 2 .035* .05* .035* *Alignment - (1) * 1 * .035* .05* .035* ***************************************************************** ************************************************************************* SUMMARY OF REACH LENGTHS River: ADOT ROW ***************************************************************** * Reach * River Sta. * Left * Channel * Right ***************************************************************** *Alignment - (1) * 7 * 52* 52* 52* *Alignment - (1) * 6 * 56* 56* 56* *Alignment - (1) * 5 * 52* 52* 52* *Alignment - (1) * 4 * 54* 54* 54* *Alignment - (1) * 3 * 56* 56* 56* *Alignment - (1) * 2 * 51* 51* 51* *Alignment - (1) * 1 ***************************************************************** ************************************************************************* SUMMARY OF CONTRACTION AND EXPANSION COEFFICIENTS River: ADOT ROW ******************************************************* * Reach * River Sta. * Contr. * Expan. ******************************************************* *Alignment - (1) * 7 * .1* .3* *Alignment - (1) * 6 * .1* .3* *Alignment - (1) * 5 * .1* .3* *Alignment - (1) * 4 * .1* .3* *Alignment - (1) * 3 * .1* .3* *Alignment - (1) * 2 * .1* .3* *Alignment - (1) * 1 * .1* .3* ******************************************************* Big Horn Commerce Center Plan: Big Horn CC Existing No Containment ADOT ROW Alignment - (1) 2633 Legend EG PF 1 WS PF 1 Crit PF 1 ■ Ground 2632 2631 v----..._. -' a� w 2630 ill 2629 4 v LO m r� 2628 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Main Channel Distance (ft) Big Horn Commerce Center Plan: Big Horn CC Existing No Containment River = ADOT ROW Reach = Alignment - (1) RS = 1 .035 .05 .035 2638 i Legend 2636 2634 c 0 m w 2632 2630 Big Horn Commerce Center Plan: Big Horn CC Existing No Containment River = ADOT ROW Reach = Alignment - (1) RS = 2 .035 .05 .035 �azu ■ Legend 2636 Crit PF 1 Crit PF 1 ■ 26341 ■ Ground c Ground Ineff > Ineff • 2 2632 w }� • Bank Sta I i ' I Bank Sta 2628 1 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Station (ft) Big Horn Commerce Center Plan: Big Horn CC Existing No Containment River = ADOT ROW Reach = Alignment - (1) RS = 3 .035 - .05 ` < .035 2630 2628 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Station (ft) Big Horn Commerce Center Plan: Big Horn CC Existing No Containment River = ADOT ROW Reach = Alignment - (1) RS = 4 .035 .05 1 .035 2640 Legend 2640- 2638 i -- ------------ EG PF 1 2638 WS PF 1 2636 Crit PF 1 2636- Ground c g 2634 g 2634 > Ineff > � w 2632 • Bank Sta m w 2632 2630 263 2628 :. 2628 . 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Station (ft) Station (ft) Legend Crit PF 1 Ground Ineff • Bank Sta Big Horn Commerce Center Plan: Big Horn CC Existing No Containment River = ADOT ROW Reach = Alignment - (1) RS = 5 .035 .05 -.035 2640 2638 2636 C 2634 CU 2632 2630 Legend ----- -- - - --- Big Horn Commerce Center Plan: Big Horn CC Existing No Containment River = ADOT ROW Reach = Alignment - (1) IRS = 6 - .035 .05 .035 2642 EG PF 1 2 2640 WS PF 1 2638 Crit PF 1 Ground o 2636 —♦---- - Ineff mff > 2634 Bank Sta w 2632- 2630 2628 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0 50 100 Station (ft) Big Horn Commerce Center Plan: Big Horn CC Existing No Containment River = ADOT ROW Reach = Alignment - (1) IRS = 7 .035 .05 .035 2642 2640 2638 c w 2636 a� w 2634 2632 2630 - 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Station (ft) Legend ------------ EG PF 1 WSPF1 Crit PF 1 Ground Ineff • Bank Sta 150 200 250 300 350 Station (ft) Legend F( PF 1 Crit PF 1 Ground Ineff • Bank Sta HEC-RAS Plan: BHCC Exist No Co River: ADOT ROW Reach: Alignment- (1) Profile: PF 1 Reach River Sta Profile Q Total Min Ch El W.S. Elev Crit W.S. E.G. Elev E.G. Slope Vel Chnl Flow Area Top Width Fronde # Chi (cfs)� (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/ft) (ft/s) (sgft) -(ft) Alignment - (1) 7 PF 1 130.00 2631.68 2632.23 2632.23 2632.42 0.056102 3.55 36.67 116.88 _ 1.0_4 Alignment - (1) 6 PF 1 130.00 2629.98 2631.33 2630.96 2631.45 0.007908 2.82 48.08 143.07 0.47 Alignment - (1) 5 PF 1 130.00 2629.86 2630.96 2630.52 2631.04 0.006524 2.30 56.69 199.77 0.42 Alignment - (1) 4 PF 1 130.00 2629.56 2630.55 2630.22 2630.64 0.008990 2.46 53.08 245.89 0.48 Alignment - (1) 3 PF 1 130.00 2628.00 2630.53 2629.04 2630.55 0.000479 1.10 121.33 265.38 0.13 Alignment - (1) 2 PF 1 130.00 2628.00 2630.52 2628.62 2630.53 0.000253 0.86 155.97 272.721 0.101 Alignment-(1) 1 PF 1 130.00 2628.00 2630.50 2628.67 2630.51 0.000295 0.91 150.00 294.95 _ 0.10, BigHornCC HEC-RAS Version 4.1.0 Jan 2010 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center 609 Second Street Davis, California Proposed Conditions Model x x xxxxxx xxxx xxxx xx xxxx x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x xxxxxxx xxxx x xxx xxxx xxxxxx xxxx x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x xxxxxx xxxx x x x x xxxxx ******************************************************************************** PROJECT DATA Project Title: Big Horn Commerce Center Project File : BigHornCC.prj Run Date and Time: 1/31/2017 1:30:00 PM Project in English units ******************************************************************************** PLAN DATA Plan Title: Big Horn CC Proposed No Containment Plan File : F:\Perry Engineering\16017 - Big Horn Commerce Center\Drainage\HECRAS\BigHornCC.p03 Geometry Title: Big Horn CC Proposed Geometry File : F:\Perry Engineering\16017 - Big Horn Commerce Center\Drainage\HECRAS\BigHornCC.g02 Flow Title Big Horn CC Existing Flow File F:\Perry Engineering\16017 - Big Horn Commerce Center\Drainage\HECRAS\BigHornCC.f01 Plan Summary Information: Number of: Cross Sections = 7 Multiple Openings = 0 Culverts = 0 Inline Structures = 0 Bridges = 0 Lateral Structures = 0 Computational Information Page 1 BigHornCC Water surface calculation tolerance = 0.01 Critical depth calculation tolerance = 0.01 Maximum number of iterations = 20 Maximum difference tolerance = 0.3 Flow tolerance factor = 0.001 Computation Options Critical depth computed only where necessary Conveyance Calculation Method: At breaks in n values only Friction Slope Method: Average Conveyance Computational Flow Regime: Subcritical Flow ******************************************************************************** FLOW DATA Flow Title: Big Horn CC Existing Flow File : F:\Perry Engineering\16017 - Big Horn Commerce Center\Drainage\HECRAS\BigHornCC.fO1 Flow Data (cfs) ************************************************************* * River Reach RS * PF 1 * ADOT ROW Alignment - (1) 7 * 130 ************************************************************* Boundary Conditions *********************************************************************************** ********************* * River Reach Profile * Upstream Downstream *********************************************************************************** ********************* * ADOT ROW Alignment - (1) PF 1 Known WS = 2630.5 *********************************************************************************** ********************* ******************************************************************************** SUMMARY OF MANNING'S N VALUES River:ADOT ROW ***************************************************************** * Reach * River Sta. * n1 * n2 * n3 ***************************************************************** *Alignment - (1) * 7 * .035* .05* .035* Page 2 BigHornCC *Alignment - (1) * 6 * .035* .05* .035* *Alignment - (1) * 5 * .035* .05* .035* *Alignment - (1) * 4 * .035* .05* .035* *Alignment - (1) * 3 * .035* .05* .035* *Alignment - (1) * 2 * .035* .05* .035* *Alignment - (1) * 1 * .035* .05* .035* ***************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** SUMMARY OF REACH LENGTHS River: ADOT ROW ***************************************************************** * Reach * River Sta. * Left * Channel * Right ***************************************************************** *Alignment - (1) * 7 * 52* 52* 52* *Alignment - (1) * 6 * 56* 56* 56* *Alignment - (1) * 5 * 52* 52* 52* *Alignment - (1) * 4 * 54* 54* 54* *Alignment - (1) * 3 * 56* 56* 56* *Alignment - (1) * 2 * 51* 51* 51* *Alignment - (1) * 1 ***************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** SUMMARY OF CONTRACTION AND EXPANSION COEFFICIENTS River: ADOT ROW ******************************************************* * Reach * River Sta. * Contr. * Expan. ******************************************************* *Alignment - (1) * 7 * .1* .3* *Alignment - (1) * 6 * .1* .3* *Alignment - (1) * 5 * .1* .3* *Alignment - (1) * 4 * .1* .3* *Alignment - (1) * 3 * .1* .3* *Alignment - (1) * 2 * .1* .3* *Alignment - (1) * 1 * .1* .3* ******************************************************* Page 3 Big Horn Commerce Center Plan-. Big Horn CC Proposed No Containment ADOT ROW Alignment - (1) - - 2633 Legend ------------- EG PF 1 WS PF 1 Crit PF 1 Ground 2632 2631 v --- --- -- ------------------ m > a� w 2630 ' 2629 ----------------- v �n co r- 2628 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Main Channel Distance (ft) Big Horn Commerce Center Plan: Big Horn CC Proposed No Containment River = ADOT ROW Reach = Alignment - (1) RS = 1 - .035 .05 .035 > 2638 2636 2634 0 .6 w 2632 2630 Legend -------------- Big Horn Commerce Center Plan: Big Horn CC Proposed No Containment River = ADOT ROW Reach = Alignment - (1) RS = 2 .035 - .05 -.035 2638 r -Legend 2636 Crit PF 1 j Crit PF 1 —■ = 2634 —+ Ground c Ground Ineff > Ineff m w 2632 Ban Sta Bank Sta 2628 1 1 1 , + 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Station (ft) Big Horn Commerce Center Plan: Big Horn CC Proposed No Containment River = ADOT ROW Reach = Alignment - (1) RS = 3 2630 2628 'IMFE§0§mqFE% - r-wFUMVMd 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Station (ft) Big Horn Commerce Center Plan: Big Horn CC Proposed No Containment River = ADOT ROW Reach = Alignment - (1) RS = 4 .035- - .05 - .035 .035 - .05 .035 - 2640 Legend 2640 2638 --- -- --- -- -- EG PF 1 2638 WSPF1 2636 Crit PF 1 2636 ^ Ground c 2634 --� 0 2634 > Ineff > m • a� w 2632 Bank Sta w 2632 2630 2630 2628 j - 2628 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Station (ft) Station (ft) Legend EG PF 1 WS PF 1 Crit PF 1 Ground A--- Ineff • Bank Sta Big Horn Commerce Center Plan: Big Horn CC Proposed No Containment River = ADOT ROW Reach = Alignment - (1) RS = 5 2640 2638 2636 C g CC 2634 w 2632 2630 Big Horn Commerce Center Plan: Big Horn CC Proposed No Containment River = ADOT ROW Reach = Alignment - (1) RS = 6 .035 - .05 - .035 Legend 2642 Legend -------- -F--- -------------------- 1 EG PF 1 2640 r. Fr PF I WS PF 1 2638 Crit PF 1 Ground c o 2636 Ineff � M 2634 Bank Sta w _- 2632 2628 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Station (ft) Big Horn Commerce Center Plan: Big Horn CC Proposed No Containment River = ADOT ROW Reach = Alignment - (1) RS = 7 .035 — .05 - --T.035 =II 2642 Legend EG PF 1 2640 WS PF 1 2638 _-- Crit PF 1 c Ground = 2636 co > Ineff w 2634 • Bank Sta 2632 2630 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Station (ft) 2630 2628 0 50 100 150 200 250 Station (ft) 300 350 Crit PF 1 Ground Ineff • Bank Sta HEC-RAS Plan: BHCC ProD No Con River: ADOT ROW Reach: Alignment - (1) Profile: PF 1 Reach River Sta Profile Q Total Min Ch El W.S. Elev Crit W.S. E.G. Elev E.G. Slope Vel Chnl I Flow Area Top Width ; Froude # Chl_ (cfs) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/ft),(ft/s) (5q ft)_ - ��(ft)-- - - .._,I Alignment - (1) 7 _ PF 1 130.00 2631.68 2632.32 2632.32 2632.56 0.048384 3.93 33.11 70.58 1.01 Alignment-(1) 6 PF1 130.00 2629.98 2631.33 2630.96 2631.45 2.82 48.10 55.50 0.47 Alignment - (1) 5 PF 1 130.00 2629.86 2630.96 2630.52 2631.04 _0.007895 0.006341 2.28 57.20 61.85 0.41 Alignment- (1) 14 PF 1 130.00 2629.56 2630.55 2630.23 2630.65 0.009267 2.50 52.01 62.95 0.48 Alignment- (1) 3 PF 1 130.00 2628.00 2630.53 2629.04 2630.55 0.000496 1.12 116.90 64.64 0.13 Alignment - (1) 2 PF 1 130.00 2628.00 2630.52 2628.62 2630.53 0.000292 0.90 146.13 66.51 0.10' Alignment - (1) 1 PF 1 130.00 2628.00 2630.50 2628.67 2630.51 0.000354 0.98 136.23 65.55 0.11 Big Horn Commerce Center Existing and Proposed Water Surface Elevations Encroachment Analysis No Containment at Downstream Culvert in Proposed Condition Existing Proposed Existing Proposed WSEL Channel Channel Velocity Cross WSEL WSEL Difference Velocity Velocity Difference Section (ft) (ft) (Prop - Exist) (ft/s) (ft/s) M 7 2632.23 2632.32 0.09 3.55 3.93 10.70 6 2631.33 2631.33 0.00 2.82 2.82 0.00 5 2630.96 2630.96 0.00 2.30 2.28 -0.87 4 2630.55 2630.55 0.00 2.46 2.50 1.63 3 2630.53 2630.53 0.00 1.10 1.12 1.82 2 2630.52 2630.52 0.00 0.86 0.90 4.65 1 2630.50 2630.50 0.00 0.91 0.98 7.69 Detention Routing PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT ROUTING OF A FL000 HYDROGRAPH THROUGH A STORMWATER DETENTION I RETENTION FACILITY FWN CONTao� Worksheet to Input the Inflow Hydroaraph 8 to Automat'cally Pertorm the Routing Calculations using the Stage -Volume data Volume -Outflow data 8 SO Workina Curve we Bi Hom Commerce Center Project Address CTL Data Sheet Preparer Tuesday, January 31, 2017 Run Date PC-Route.xls Program File Name Rev. 2113 GOVERNING EQUATIONS: Ref: AOWled Hydro/ooy Nen To Chow. Editor 19641 Note: Input 51 8 inflow hydrograph into blue shaded area: outflow hydrograph (yellow) is calculated from selected outflow configuration (vol-outflow tab) and facility geometry (Stage -Vol tab). To add rows to this worksheet, add Conservation of mass: 0.5 ` (I, + I�)'.1t - 0.5' (O, + Oz)' At = S, - S, them in roughly the center of the range, then unhide all columns and copy hidden equations into the new rows. Zero Isolate, divide by At: 0.5 ` (1, + Iz) + S, / At - 0.5 ` a = S, I At + 0,5 ` O; Idischarge beyond the end of the hydrograph will not affect the simulation. VARIA$LEs: At sec time interval over which inflow hydrograph is linear, and which is less than travel time through facility 1„ 12 cfs inflow rate into facility at start and end of time interval from inflow flood hydrograph O„ O_ cfs facilely outflow rate at start 8 end of time interval from outlet works characteristics (function of stage) S„ S1 fta stormwater in storage in the facility at start and end of time interval RESULTS: return max inflow I max outflow max storage max stage (H)' 100 yr 24.90 cfs 13.25 its 26346 fta O.6D5 of 2.00 ft 22 min to yr 16.60 cfs 4.fi6 cfs 17514 fts 0.402 of 1.74 ft 29 min 2 11.20 cfs 2.32 its 11448 ft3 0.263 of 1.34 ft 31 min UTDATA: At = T = 1 index Inflow count I, cfs 0 0. 1 0. 2 1. 3 2. 4 4. 5 5. 6 7. 7 9. 8 11. 9 13. 10 16. 11 19. 12 21. 13 24. 14 24. 15 23. 16 21. 17 20. 18 18. 19 17. 20 15. 21 14. 22 13. 23 12. 24 11. 25 10. 26 9. 27 8. 28 7. 29 6. 30 B. 31 5. 32 4. 33 4. 34 4. 35 3. 36 3. 37 2. 38 2. 39 2. 40 2. 41 2. 42 1. 43 1. 44 1. 45 1. 46 1. 47 1. 48 1. 49 1. 50 0. 51 0. 52 0. 53 0. 54 0. 55 0. 56 0. 57 0. 58 0. 59 0. 60 0. 61 0. 62 0. 63 D. 64 0. 65 0.30 0.20 0.20 0.0167 hr inflow 0 yr 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 11.25 17.65 25.90 36.05 48.24 62.78 79.89 99.49 121.09 143.64 165.29 184.80 201.76 216.13 226.94 233.69 237.25 238.56 238.31 236.99 235.03 232.68 230.08 227.36 224.60 221.82 219.06 216.27 213.70 211.23 198.50 195.98 193.22 190.53 187.85 185.19 182.53 179.92 177.36 174.83 172.34 169.87 167.42 164.99 162.61 160.32 158.07 155.82 153.59 151.35 149.11 146.88 144.70 142.52 140.34 138.22 136.14 0.30 0.90 1.70 2.60 3.70 4.80 6.10 7.40 8.90 10.70 12.70 14.60 15.10 16.60 15.60 14.50 13.50 12.50 11.50 10.60 9.80 9.00 8.20 7.50 6.80 6.20 5.60 5.10 4.50 4.00 3.70 3.30 2.90 2.70 2.30 2.10 2.00 1.70 1.60 1.40 1.30 1.20 1.10 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.10 N ' Max Design Stage = 2.10 ft NOTE: IF H > MAX DESIGNS AGE EXTEND STAGE-VOL DATA TO A HIGHER STAGE 2 yr 100 year 1 10 year 1 2 S/At+O/2 Inflow S/At+0/2 outflow Stage outflow Stage outflow CIS I cfs cfs O cfs H ft O cfs H It O cfs 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.20 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.60 0.50 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.00 2.05 1.10 1.35 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.03 0.00 4.20 1.70 2.75 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.06 0.00 7.35 2.40 4.80 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.11 0.00 11.60 3.20 7.60 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.17 0.00 17.05 4.00 11.20 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.24 0.00 23.80 4.80 15.60 0.05 0.46 0.00 0.32 0.00 31.95 5.80 20.90 0.21 0.59 0.02 0.42 0.00 41.73 7.00 27.30 0.49 0.73 0.12 0.52 0.00 53.31 8.30 34.95 0.90 0.89 0.30 0.64 0.05 66.66 9.50 43.80 1.40 1.05 0.58 0.77 0.15 81.43 10.50 53.66 1.95 1.23 0.94 0.90 0.31 96.84 11.20 64.20 2.50 1.39 1.33 1.03 0.53 111.61 10.20 74.37 3.09 1.55 1.71 1.15 0.76 124.95 9.50 83.46 4.09 1.68 2.05 1.25 0.99 136.91 8.80 91.63 5.13 1.79 2.34 1.34 1.19 147.56 8.10 98.88 7.19 1.87 2.60 1.42 1.38 156.97 7.50 105.30 9.85 1.94 2.81 1.49 1.55 165.20 6.90 110.96 11.74 1.97 3.09 1.55 1.69 172.31 6.40 115.91 12.84 1.99 3.42 1.60 1.82 178.30 5.90 120.24 13.25 2.00 3.72 1.64 1.93 183.17 5.40 123.97 13.17 2.00 3.99 1.67 2.02 187.03 4.90 127.09 12.76 1.99 4.22 1.69 2.10 189.95 4.50 129.69 12.15 1.98 4.39 1.71 2.17 192.07 4.00 131.78 11.44 1.97 4.52 1.73 2.22 193.45 3.60 133.36 10.72 1.95 4.60 1.73 2.26 194.19 3.30 134.55 9.97 1.94 4.65 1.74 2.28 194.34 3.00 135.42 9.23 1.92 4.66 1.74 2.31 193.93 2.60 135.91 8.55 1.91 4.63 1.74 2.32 193.15 2.40 136.09 7.99 1.89 4.59 1.73 2.32 192.06 2.10 136.02 7.23 1.88 4.52 1.73 2.32 190.64 1.90 135.70 6.66 1.86 4.43 1.72 2.31 189.01 1.70 135.19 6.25 1.85 4.34 1.71 2.30 187.17 1.50 134.49 5.87 1.83 4.23 1.69 2.28 185.15 1.40 133.66 5.48 1.82 4.11 1.68 2.25 183.09 1.30 132.74 5.25 1.80 3.99 1.67 2.24 180.95 1.10 131.70 5.09 1.78 3.87 1.85 2.22 178.73 1.00 130.54 4.92 1.77 3.75 1.64 2.19 176.48 0.90 129.30 4.76 1.75 3.53 1.62 2.16 174.20 0.80 127.99 4.59 1.73 3.51 1.61 2.12 171.94 0.80 126.67 4.43 1.72 3.40 1.59 2.09 169.69 0.70 125.33 4.27 1.70 3.29 1.58 2.06 167.45 0.70 123.97 4.11 1.68 3.19 1.56 2.02 165.22 0.60 122.60 3.96 1.65 3.09 1.55 1.99 163.03 0.60 121.21 3.81 1.65 3.00 1.53 1.95 160.88 0.50 119.81 3.87 1.63 2.92 1.52 1.92 158.70 0.50 118.39 3.54 1.61 2.86 1.50 1.88 155.54 0.40 116.96 3.42 1.60 2.81 1.49 1.85 154.39 0.40 115.51 3.30 1.58 2.76 1.47 1.81 152.18 0.40 114.10 3.19 1.56 2.70 1.46 1.77 149.98 0.30 112.68 3.08 1.54 2.65 1.44 1.74 147.83 0.30 111.24 2.98 1.53 2.60 1.42 1.70 145.67 0.30 109.85 2.90 151 2.55 1.41 1.55 143.52 0.30 108.48 2.84 1.50 2.50 1.39 1.63 141.42 0.20 107.10 2.79 1.48 2.45 1.38 1.59 139.32 0.20 105.71 2.74 1.47 2.40 1.36 1.56 137.22 0.20 104.35 2.68 1.45 2.35 1.35 1.52 135.17 0.20 103.03 2.63 1.43 2.30 1.33 1.49 133.17 0.20 101.74 2.58 1.42 2.25 1.32 1.45 131.17 0.20 100.49 2.53 1.40 2.20 1.30 1.42 129.16 0.10 99.22 2.48 1.39 2.15 1.29 1.39 127.21 0.10 97.93 2.43 1.37 2.10 1.27 1.36 125.31 0.10 96.67 2.37 1.35 2.06 1.26 1.32 123.45 0.10 95.45 2.32 1.34 2.01 1.24 1.29 121.64 0.10 94.26 2.27 1.32 1.96 1.23 1.26 119.83 0.10 93.10 2.22 1.31 1.92 1.22 1.23 0.0cn O.Oc 0.01 0.11 0.1E 0. PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT ROUTING OF A FLOOD HYDROGRAPH THROUGH A STORMWATER DETENTION / RETENTION FACILITY fRego�uI 100D CONTROL Worksheet to Input the Stage -Volume Relationship for the Stormwater Detention /Retention Facility S T 0. I { Big Horn Commerce Center Project Address CTL Data Sheet Preparer Tuesday, January 31, 2017 Run Date PC-Route.xls Program File Name Rev.2/13 GOVERNING EQUATIONS: Ref.. HEC-1 Flood Hvdrograph Package User's Manual /USACOE September 1990) Conic method for Reservoir Volumes: AV,-2 = 0.33 - h " (A + Az + (A - A-)05) (see "Conic Proj" tab) 'ARIABLES: AV,-2 of incremental facility storage volume between stages H, and Hz h ft elevation difference between A, and Az Al, A2 ac facility surface area at stages H, and H: 2.10 = max design stage (ft) Input data: Intennedia for information only stage area volume area volume !i 4V AV HIft A. ac AV, of A, ft` AV, ft' S. ft' S: of 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.10 0.00903 393 393 0.00903 0.20 0.01020 444 838 0.01923 0.30 0.01106 482 1320 0.03029 0.40 0.01180 514 1834 0.04210 0.50 0.01247 543 2377 0.05457 0.60 0.01309 570 2947 0.06766 0.70 0.01377 600 3547 0.08144 0.80 0.01452 632 4180 0.09595 0.90 0.01523 663 4843 0.11118 1.00 0.01592 694 5537 0.12710 1.10 0.01659 723 6259 0.14369 1.20 0.01724 751 7010 0.16093 1.30 0.01786 778 7788 0.17879 1.40 0.01847 805 8593 0.19726 1.50 0.01906 830 9423 0.21632 1.60 0.01963 855 10278 0.23595 1.70 0.02018 879 11157 0.25613 1.80 0.02071 902 12059 0.27685 1.90 0.02123 925 12984 0.29807 2.00 0.02172 946 13930 0.31980 2.10 0.000 0 13930 0.31980 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 e Calcs: Note: Develop stage -storage curve on this worksheet by either entering in the blue shaded column the planimetered basin areas (in acres) at various stages or by entering facility stages and corresponding incremental volumes (acre-feet, purple shaded column). Graph of the stage -storage curve shown to verify proper interpolation (purple points) of facility volume by Vol Outflow lab. You may insert rows into the middle of this table to accomodate the size of your data set; empty rows below the extent of your data will not cause a problem. However, if you insert rows, you must unhide the hidden columns (columns K through N) and copy the hidden equations into the new rows. Stage - Volume data must begin at stage = 0 ft with a volume of 0 af. STAGE -STORAGE CURVE 0.35 - - D.30 s 0 0.20 -- D.15 U 0.10 - 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.50 1,00 1.50 2.00 2.50 STAGE, ft tzzzzv 6 lS tVo 0 3Dtl1S 11 a69Ls 90 MOyL0O wos spE pw941"I9'9zp13W3HiQxrvW1311N0 ��3a w 31tlllllOtld O13X3X D31N333tld S11I1S3tl NOI1tllOW15 W'p 9rb WZZ DD'D ce's FR_ a0D fe'/ Brec Da"a fb'/ 91z W"0 L9'I OLm BPD .I IL'Z DO"0 fiE'I W'a DO'D 9EI ZL'Z "D HL'I W'2L WO EC'I OtZ DO'0 8fi'E OS'9L W'0 6Z'I 907 W'D CL"E W'/t W"0 9Z'I W'L M.LSD m L I W'0 ZZ"I K z WD LE"£ W'9 W'0 6I'I a DO"0 HID W'9 W'0 SL'I DO W"D — W'b W'0 orb LGI Wn ZL'L 09'f W'0 90'I wl 00'0 Is DO DO "D Po'I cal OD'a We W'Z Wn fi6'E lfi"L OD'0 fil'Z O93 W'0 96'E 69'L W"O W'Z W'4 W'o t6"E GB'L W"0 98'4 W'0 DOD DOD 4L'4 W"0 W'D ro"f EB•l W'o ss'L Do'o W'0 DB"e IB'L DO'0 lb'L W"0 W"0 SG"E U3 Wn 6I"l W"0 W'D 99'f Wl W'0 90"l W"0 DOD W"E IL'L W"0 ­0 W"0 W'0 ron LL'L GO DO W'o DO'D 9" DL'I W. 69'D OD'o W'D Zbn as'{ W"o 4'D 00'0 W"D , s9't 000 Lro W'D W'0 fiZ"E K'l W'B 1f'0 W'D WD — es 00'D Bz'0 W,D DOD Gt"e 09'l 000 oz"0 000 ap-0 mE 9s 1 W"B OLD WD ODD lo'i sst DOD Wo W'D Wn sfiz E9'L W'D ID"p DOD W"D sez ts"t W"a DOD DOD Wo LEL firs W'a Do'D W'a W'D slz Grl Oo"0 W"O DO'0 MD 69'I 90't DO"0 W'p W'D OD'0 Z9'Z EI'{ W"0 W'0 DOD W'a W'0 9Ez Lrl 6E't DO W'0 00'0 0'0 EI'L GL E 00D Oa"D W '0 Do0 W'0 tt'Z K't 0o"O Pon W'0 00'0 9Z'Z Del W'o W'a W'n W'a orL ort W'B W"a W'a W"0 erz ert W'0 W'0 W'0 W'O 'z 9L W'0 Wn W'0 W'0 WZ /Vl W"a DOD W'o W'o CD Lrt ooD W'0 DOD DOD LEI orl 00'0 00D DOD .0 W't HL'L W'0 W"D W'0 W'0 IL 9rl W'0 W"0 W'0 W"0 09'L El'4 Dan WD OD'o WD LEt Wl OD'D W'D DO'0 W"0 ls'L - WL W'D oD'D DO'. Wn Wb LO'L Wo W'0 WD Wn 9E'L 9011 DD'0 Do WD Do a W'L .D W'D W"o DO'. 9Z'L 101 W"0 WD W'0 OO'D OZ't fi8'0 WD OD'O W"0 wo Il'I" L6'0 DOD W. W'D W'0 Po'l 560 00'0 W"0 W"0 W"0 fifi"O Z:. W'0 W. W"0 W'0 f6n OD W'0 W'0 W'o Wn Le'O 00"0 00'0 W'0 W"0 W"D Z9'0 9H"p 00'0 DOD WO W'0 9L'0 I9'B W'0 W'0 00'0 DOD IL'0 Z9"D W"o W'a W,o W"D 99D ae'D W"p No W"o W"a L9'0 9 '0 W"o WD W'o W. %D 9L'0 D., DOD W'o 00'0 I9"0.. rG'B W'B W'0 W'0 oo 'O IrtL 0 o W'o W"o DO Wn Ora fi9"B Wn DO WO Wn W. 49'o W"0 DO W'D W"O Len s9"o Wn DO WD Wn WD E9'0 DO W'0 00'D 00'0 S2'o t9'D W'0 W"o W'0 W"0 LL"D fis'0 W'o W'n W'D WD Bra LS"0 W"o WD W D W'O SI'0 Wo W'0 W'0 DO DO EL'0 ES'0 W'0 W'D W'D W "0 60 '0 09'0 DO DO D W'0 OO'0 GO'a HI'0 DO DO W'0 W'0 SD"O 9I'0 W"B W'p W"p W D ro"o »"0 W"o DO W"o W'a Ebn ZbD WD Ou"D W'o W'O Zo"D oro DD'o WD M'D W"o 00'o W'D W'o Wa LD"o He'a W'B Wn W'O IE'o DO DO D Wa DO D LEo W" Wn DO WD wo W-p Wn W"B firo Do"D W"D D ODD Lro DB"D W'D W'D DO OOO . "p SrD DO WO W'B oo"B Ero W"o Wo Wo W"0 DOD 00,D ILD W'0 W'o Wn Wn firo OD Wn Wn W'o W"0 W"0 Lro W"0 ou'D W'B W"o sro M. OD"a GO0 W'o W'o W'p erD 22,0 22;0 WO WO WO Lro .V, vla 06686 EI W'6E� = al ue yalou o' =l aP1B CE'0 = leauap qu I - lu aoa yxP Of Ot 0'E = aoylapa Vase S'Z = 9 =full up le aBep :(Y13 anal lsan 00 OS 00 =1W1 LY lsan le a6Ep O'6666 =1Uli paoyam 4Pv0 L9n D =D .. V. f:.aWi. �. b :uo9mE3 qaM lelnBunll �•b :u enH3 avM lelnBuePay �a.Aw�aq�,ua uoemcamay iiax p ,19.B. Ll.v.�•o :uglen6e esylO x�1Jo R6i1nFtl 3 -aneua pryw-a�npn aiq dga.nP of eWaLvaui W L oau a6eN u6naP AYlaelunwaew sipup AleaLeugY�e Y Pa1sVOM w lvu v0'(Vq.P0a6g9.. anal dX%�Pugw aunpnaHep woYwwladPwbaBep weapluYnpa lael` aweN alld wu6ad vylslnPb}Od a6egl9lsl mAigneluauB aw qo uPipunleze'Payarygn zXl apnpP pa�eEAw zxgpnP yq✓n an�e Papaw aprtd aUuua,.P Te0 uny L40L'IC YeE' aPvanl �o lsea.e pap_aanpl uoue.n9yuu PIS^o iw Puipu�sauaa slua aanlo unP I>alaz Pvaisuaiaeieu^alelnd 1 �aeetlaid laa4s ele0 z aapPtl ualPld Aalua0 as.woO wol{ !S vl, r a J u V � i I ay I I I ISm 1 4 IPa4 V+ unpva o...O. p31Lui0oltte xplOINlSl0lO1l1NO0 OOOIi 1tlNO1O3tl A1Nf1OO tlWld eu PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FLOOD F100D CONTRdt ROUTING OF A FLOOD HYDROGRAPH THROUGH A STORMWATER DETENTION / RETENTION FACILITY o I s r n I c T THIS TAB CONTAINS NO INPUT DATA Worksheet to Summarize Results of the Reservoir Routing of the Inflow Hvdrograph using the Specified Detention Facility and Outlet Works Big Horn Commerce Center Project Address 4-0 CTL Data Sheet Preparer Tuesday, January31, 2017 Run Date Rev.2/13 PC-Route.xls Program File Name 30.0 FLOOD PEAK ATTENUATION BY MODIFIED PULS -- - 1 100 yr o-,now 25.0 10 Yr Inflow ---- 10 Yr Outflow 20.0 -- - 2 Yr inflow � - - - - 2Yr OWN - Li _ I 0: 15.0 - _-- - r ------------ 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 TIME, hm 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 1 ORIFICE OUTFLOW ELEMENT TRIANGULAR WEIR OUTFLOW ELEMENT I RECTANGULAR WEIR OUTFLOW ELEMENT(S) RCB OUTFLOW ELEMENT d, (in) = C (dim) = N = my (ft) = 12.0 0.61 1.0 0.3 diameter discharge coef nbr identical openings stage at invert Z = Ew(ft) = B = C1 = 0.8 9999.0 BD.D side slope stage at weir crest 'notch angle discharge coef rect 1 rect 2 rect 3 D (ft) = B (ft) = Ey (ft) - 2.0 2.0 9999.0 rise span sta eat invert L (ft) = C = Ew (ft) = 0.0 3.0 9999.0 3.0 3.0 1.5 0.0 3.0 9999.0 crest length discharge coef stage at crest 2.5 50.0045.00 - -- - Total Outflow vs Stage 40.00 - --- 35.00 V V V0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 STAGE, ft i 2.0 2.5 2.00 RESULTS: return period max inflow max outflow max siora a max stage H ' • Max Design Stage = 2,10 ft i (10 yr 24.9 rfs 13.2 cfs 26346 ft3 0.605 of 2.00 ft at 22 min 10 yr 16.6 rfs 4.7 cfs 17514 ft' 0.402 of 1.74 ft at 29 min NOTE IF H> MAX DESIGN STAGE, EXTEND STAGE 2 r 11.2 cfs 2.3 ds 11448 ft' 0.263 of 1.34 ft at 31 min VOL DATA TO A HIGHER STAGE Detention Basin Staee-Storaee Table Basin 1 Basin 2 Cumulative Cumulative Storage Storage EL (ft) (ft) 2627.00 0 0 2627.10 0 31 2627.20 0 68 2627.30 0 113 2627.40 0 166 2627.50 0 225 2627.60 0 292 2627.70 4 365 2627.80 17 446 2627.90 39 535 2628.00 69 630 2628.10 108 733 2628.20 156 842 2628.30 212 959 2628.40 276 1084 2628.50 350 1215 2628.60 432 1354 2628.70 523 1499 2628.80 622 1652 2628.90 730 1813 2629.00 847 1980 4:1 4:1 Basin 1 Basin 3 UG Pipes Total Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Storage Storage Storage (ft) (ft) (ft) 0 0 0 319 43 393 648 121 838 985 221 1320 1332 336 1834 1687 465 2377 2052 604 2947 2425 752 3547 2808 908 4180 3199 1070 4843 3600 1238 5537 4009 1409 6259 4428 1584 7010 4855 1762 7788 5292 1941 8593 5737 2121 9423 6192 2300 10278 6655 2480 11157 7128 2657 12059 7609 2832 12984 8100 3004 13930 4:1 4:1 B=3' Basin 2 Input into PC -Route Spreadsheet as Stage -Storage Table Total Total Cumulative Incremental Storage A Storage (Acre -Feet) (Acre -Feet) 0.00000 0.00903 0.00903 0.01923 0.01020 0.03029 0.01106 0.04210 0.01180 0.05457 0.01247 0.06766 0.01309 0.08144 0.01377 0.09595 0.01452 0.11118 0.01523 0.12710 0.01592 0.14369 0.01659 0.16093 0.01724 0.17879 0.01786 0.19726 0.01847 0.21632 0.01906 0.23595 0.01963 0.25613 0.02018 0.27685 0.02071 0.29807 0.02123 0.31980 0.02172 Basin 3 UG Pipes Underground Pipes Stage -Storage Table Underground Storage Chambers Using Metal Pipes Pipe Diameter, D (ft) = 3.0 Submerged Approximate Pipe Pipe Pipe Elevation Stage Area Length' (ft) (ft) 2627.0 0.0 2627.1 0.1 2627.2 0.2 2627.3 0.3 2627.4 0.4 2627.5 0.5 2627.6 0.6 2627.7 0.7 2627.8 0.8 2627.9 0.9 2628.0 1.0 2628.1 1.1 2628.2 1.2 2628.3 1.3 2628.4 1.4 2628.5 1.5 2628.6 1.6 2628.7 1.7 2628.8 1.8 2628.9 1.9 2629.0 2.0 2629.1 2.1 2629.2 2.2 2629.3 2.3 2629.4 2.4 2629.5 2.5 2629.6 2.6 2629.7 2.7 2629.8 2.8 2629.9 2.9 2630.0 3.0 . Includes Connecting Pipes 0.000 0.072 0.202 0.368 0.560 0.774 1.006 1.253 1.513 1.784 2.063 2.349 2.640 2.938 3.235 3.534 3.834 4.133 4.428 4.720 5.006 5.285 5.555 5.815 6.062 6.294 5.508 6.701 6.866 6.996 7.069 (tt) 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 Number of Pipes = 4 Single Total Pipe Inlet Chamber Volume Volume Volume in All Pipes (ft) (ft) (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.8 0.0 43.4 30.4 0.0 121.4 55.2 0.0 220.7 84.0 0.0 336.2 116.2 0.0 464.6 151.0 0.0 603.8 188.0 0.0 752.1 227.0 0.0 907.9 267.5 0.0 1070.1 309.4 0.0 1237.5 352.3 0.0 1409.2 396.0 0.0 1584.2 440.4 0.0 1761.6 485.2 0.0 1940.7 530.1 0.0 2120.6 575.1 0.0 2300.4 619.9 0.0 2479.5 664.2 0.0 2657.0 708.0 0.0 2831.9 750.9 0.0 3003.6 792.8 0.0 3171.0 833.3 0.0 3333.2 872.3 0.0 3489.1 909.3 0.0 3637.3 944.1 0.0 3776.5 976.2 0.0 3905.0 1005.1 0.0 4020.4 1029.9 0.0 4119.7 1049.4 0.0 4197.8 1060.3 0.0 4241.2 For UG Pipes Stage -Storage Table Incremental Change Incremental in Total Volume Change in Volume (ft) (ac-ft) 43.4 0.0010 78.0 0.0018 99.3 0.0023 115.4 0.0027 128.5 0.0029 139.2 0.0032 148.3 0.0034 155.8 0.0036 162.2 0.0037 167.4 0.0038 171.7 0.0039 175.0 0.0040 177.4 0.0041 179.1 0.0041 179.9 0.0041 179.9 0.0041 179.1 0.0041 177.4 0.0041 175.0 0.0040 171.7 0.0039 167.4 0.0038 162.2 0.0037 155.8 0.0036 148.3 0.0034 139.2 0.0032 128.5 0.0029 115.4 0.0027 99.3 0.0023 78.0 0.0018 43.4 0.0010 Calculate Flow Area in Partially Full Pipe Underground Storage Chambers Using Metal Pipes Pipe Diameter, D (ft) = 3.0 Submerged Submerged Depth Area in Pipe (y) Theta in Pipe (A) (ft) (Radians) (ft') 0.0 0.0000 0.000 0.1 0.73" 0.072 0.2 1.0446 0.202 0.3 1.2870 0.368 0.4 1.4952 0.560 0.5 1.6821 0.774 0.6 1.8546 1.006 0.7 2.0165 1.253 0.8 2.1706 1.513 0.9 2.3186 1.784 1.0 2.4519 2.063 1.1 2.6017 2.349 1.2 2.7389 2.640 1.3 2.8741 2.936 1.4 3.0082 3.235 1.5 3.1416 3.534 1.6 3.2750 3.834 1.7 3.4091 4.133 1.8 3.5443 4.428 1.9 3.6815 4.720 2.0 3.8213 5.006 2.1 3.9646 5.285 2.2 4.1126 5.555 2.3 4.2667 5.815 2.4 4.4286 6.062 2.5 4.6010 6.294 2.6 4.7880 6.508 2.7 4.9962 6.701 2.8 S.2386 6.866 2.9 5.5488 6.996 3.0 6.2832 7.069 A = (D'/8) (0 8 2 COS-'[1 - 2(y/D)] Equivalent Flow Area in Partially Full Pipes Substitute Pipes for Rectangular Weir in PC -Route Spreadsheet Design Weir: L = 3.0 ft, H = 0.50', A = 1.5 ftz Limit Flow Depth (H or y) to 0.50 ft Number of Pipes = 4 Pipes Diameter, D (ft) = 1.0 Submerged Depth Single Pipe Total Flow in Pipe (y) Theta Flow Area Area (All Pipes) (ft) (Radians) (ft') (ftz) 0.0 0.0000 0.000 0.00 0.1 1.2870 0.041 0.16 0.2 1.8546 0.112 0.45 0.3 2.3186 0.198 0.79 0.4 2.7389 0.293 1.17 0.5 3.1416 0.393 1.57 1.5 ftz is Minimum For Substitution for Rectangular Weir 2 in PC -Route Spreadsheet A = (D2/8) (0 - sine) e = 2 cos-1 [1 - 2 (y/D) ] Irregular Shaped Weir Along Sidewalk Adjacent to Detention Basins At a Single WSEL Using Eqn. 11.8 in City of Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design Assumed Water Surface Elevation = 2629.16 Weir Segment Segment Station Elevation Coefficient Weir Length hi h2 Discharge (ft) (ft) (dim) (ft) (ft) (ft) (cfs) Basin 1 0.0 2630.00 2.7 0.0 2.9 2629.80 2.7 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 11.8 2629.60 2.7 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 16.4 2629.20 2.7 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 23.7 2629.00 2.7 0.0 0.00 0.16 0.0 34.3 2629.00 2.7 10.6 0.16 0.16 1.8 42.0 2629.00 2.7 7.7 0.16 0.16 1.3 53.0 2629.00 2.7 11.0 0.16 0.16 1.9 60.8 2629.00 2.7 7.8 0.16 0.16 1.3 77.8 2629.00 2.7 17.0 0.16 0.16 2.9 88.4 2629.00 2.7 10.6 0.16 0.16 1.8 98.0 2629.00 2.7 9.6 0.16 0.16 1.7 106.1 2629.00 2.7 8.1 0.16 0.16 1.4 111.7 2629.00 2.7 5.6 0.16 0.16 1.0 116.4 2629.10 2.7 4.7 0.16 0.06 0.5 121.4 2629.30 2.7 5.0 0.06 0.00 0.1 125.1 2629.40 2.7 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 129.7 2629.60 2.7 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 136.2 2630.00 2.7 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 Total = 15.8 Basin 2 0.0 2630.00 2.7 0.0 7.4 2629.20 2.7 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 11.1 2628.90 2.7 0.0 0.00 0.26 0.0 15.6 2629.00 2.7 4.5 0.26 0.16 1.2 20.2 2628.90 2.7 4.6 0.16 0.26 1.2 25.9 2628.80 2.7 5.7 0.26 0.36 2.7 41.1 2628.80 2.7 15.2 0.36 0.36 8.9 54.2 2629.00 2.7 13.1 0.36 0.16 4.8 63.8 2629.00 2.7 9.6 0.16 0.16 1.7 72.5 2629.00 2.7 8.7 0.16 0.16 1.5 79.2 2629.20 2.7 6.7 0.16 0.00 O.S 86.5 2930.00 2.7 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 Total = 165.80 Total = 22.3 Grand Total = 38.07 Weir Discharge Through a Range of WSELs Input into PC -Route Spreadsheet as Rectangular Weir 1 Discharge Elevation Grand Total (ft) (cfs) 2628.8 0.0 2628.9 1.8 2629.0 6.0 2629.1 22.9 2629.2 49.8 2629.3 87.6 2629.4 131.1 2629.5 180.9 Broad -Crested Weir Coefficients For Weir Coefficient Along Sidewalk Weir Broad -Crested Weir Coefficient C Values As A Function Of Weir Crest Breadth And Head Measure d Head, Breadth Of The Crest Of Weir (m) H' (mm) 0.15 0.23 0.3 0.45 0.60 0.75 0.90 1.20 1.50 3.00 4.50 60 2.80 2.75 2.69 2.62 2.54 2.48 2.44 2.38 2.34 2.49 2.68 120 2.92 2.80 2.72 2.64 2.61 2.60 2.58 2.54 2.50 2.56 2.70 180 3.08 2.89 2.75 2.64 2.61 2.60 2.68 2.69 2.70 2.70 2.70 240 3.30 3.04 2.85 2.68 2.60 2.60 2.67 2.68 2.68 2.69 2.64 300 3.32 3.14 2.98 2.75 2.66 2.64 2.65 2.67 2.68 2.68 2.63 360 3.32 3.20 3.08 2.86 2.70 2.65 2.64 2.67 2.66 2.69 2.64 420 3.32 3.26 3.20 2.92 2.77 2.68 2.64 2.65 2.65 2.67 2.64 480 3.32 3.29 3.28 3.07 2.89 2.75 2.68 2.66 2.65 2.64 2.63 240 3.32 3.32 3.31 3.07 2.88 2.74 2.68 2.66 2.65 2.64 2.63 600 3.32 3.31 3.30 3.03 2.85 2.76 2.27 2.68 2.65 2.64 2.63 750 3.32 3.32 3.31 3.28 3.07 2.89 2.81 2.72 2.67 2.64 2.63 900 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.20 3.05 2.92 2.73 2.66 2.64 2.63 1,050 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.19 2.97 2.76 2.68 2.64 2.63 1,200 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.07 2.79 2.70 2.64 2.63 1,350 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 2.88 2.74 2.64 2.63 1,500 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.07 2.79 2.64 2.63 1,650 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 2.88 2.64 2.63 d Head, H' rtrl U.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 'Measured at leap Reference: Bratei Breadth Of The Crest Of Weir (ft) 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 4.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 2.80 2.75 2.69 2.62 2.54 2.48 2.44 2.38 2.34 2.49 2.68 2.92 2.80 2.72 2.64 2.61 2.60 2.58 2.54 2.50 2.56 2.70 3.08 2.89 2.75 2.64 2.61 2.60 2.68 2.69 2.70 2.70 2.70 3.30 3.04 2.85 2.68 2.60 2.60 2.67 2.68 2.68 2.69 2.64 3.32 3.14 2.98 2.75 2.66 2.64 2.65 2.67 2.68 2.68 2.63 3.32 3.20 3.08 2.86 2.70 2.65 2.64 2.67 2.66 2.69 2.64 3.32 3.26 3.20 2.92 2.77 2.68 2.64 2.65 2.65 2.67 2.64 3.32 3.29 3.28 3.07 2.89 2.75 2.68 2.66 2.65 2.64 2.63 3.32 3.32 3.31 3.07 2.88 2.74 2.68 2.66 2.65 2.64 2.63 3.32 3.31 3.30 3.03 2.85 2.76 2.27 2.68 2.65 2.64 2.63 3.32 3.32 3.31 3.28 3.07 2.89 2.81 2.72 2.67 2.64 2.63 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.20 3.05 2.92 2.73 2.66 2.64 2.63 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.19 2.97 2.76 2.68 2.64 2.63 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.07 2.79 2.70 2.64 2.63 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 2.88 2.74 2.64 2.63 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.07 2.79 2.64 2.63 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 2.88 2.64 2.63 t 2.5H upstream of the weir. and King (1976). Hydraulic Cross Section at Shurgard Self Storage PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT NORMAL FLOW DISCHARGE USING MANNING'S EQUATION Shurgard Self Storage Entrance Driveway Project Address Discharge talc for an ASSUMED WSEL&CHNL SLOPE Up to two chnls may be defined far an IRREGULAR section by providing BANK STA CTL Preparer LEFT, RIGHT. Manning's equ is not subdivided w/i defined ohnl(s), where COMPOSITE CHNL n is used. Roughness coeff (n) automatically entered in purple based on BANK STAs & COMPOSITE / OVERBANK n; this may be overwritten by preparar, but equations in purple area are IRREGULAR RECTANGULAR 11 TRAPEZOIDAL PARABOLIC CIRCULAR than lost. Select approproste button to set up geometry & mar of ground pats. IRREGULAR button expends spreadsheet to filar of grit pnls, which may NBR GROUND PNTS = 30 (min Of 7, max Of 100) CRI T FLOW then be entered in blue -shaded area. Other buttons dewlap gnd pints & bank sts for simple cross sections. Then enter CHNL SLOPE, n & vary ASSUMED WSEL = 73 2626�O2 ft WSEL to get desired normal flow DISCHARGE. CRIT FLOW button is effective once desired normal flow DISCHARGE is established, & applies CHNL SLOPE = ft/ft HOOD COHTR01 to entire cross section. COMPOSITE CHNL n: dim o � s 1 n c r GOVERNING EQUATIONS: n = Manning's roughness coefficient D = flow depth OVERBANK n = dim �,,,,_�, 11 ?; ., O = V A A = flow area T = topwidth CHNL 1 CHNL 2 •-=e'?'- R = A / P P = wetted perimeter Q = discharge BANK STA LEFT = BANK STA RIGHT = DISCHARGE = PNT STA (ft) ELEV (ft) 0.0 27.6 0.0 0.0 cfs It - " It V = (1.49 Rcaa S," / n R = hydraulic radius g = gravitational acceleration F = V I (g A / T)r V = flow velocity d = denotes incremental value 63 Wednesda , February 1, 2017 V 11/12 n dim A A ft a P ft AR ft V ft1s D ft A T ft 4 Q cfs 1 2 0.0 2627.0 0.1 2626.5 OB CH i CH 2 OB CH 1 CH 2 OB OB OB CH 1 CH 2 08 CH 1 CH 2 OB OB 0.016 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.28 0.1 3 1.5 2626.4 0.016 0.0 0.4 0.0 1.4 0.30 1.4 4 2.4 2626.4 0.016 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.9 0.30 0.9 _ 5 3.9 2626.4 0.016 0.0 0.4 0.0 1.5 0.30 1.5 6 4.7 2626.4 0.016 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.8 0.30 0.8 7 6.8 2626.4 0.016 0.0 0.7 0.0 2.1 0.32 2.1 8 8.1 2626.4 0.016 0.0 0.4 0.0 1 1.3 0.32 1.3 9 9.6 2626.4 0.016 0.0 0.5 0.0 1.5 0.34 1.5 10 10.9 2626.4 0.016 0.0 0.4 0.0 1.3 0.36 1.3 11 12.1 2626.3 0.016 0.0 0.4 0.0 1.2 0.38 1.2 12 12.5 2626.3 0.016 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.40 0.4 13 13.4 2626.3 0.016 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.9 0.43 0.9 14 14.5 2626.3 0.016 0.0 0.5 0.0 1.1 0.45 1.1 15 15.4 2626.3 0.016 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.9 9 0.47 0.9 16 15.9 2626.2 0.016 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.5 0.49 0.5 17 16.9 2626.2 0.016 0.0 0.5 0.0 1.0 0.49 1.0 18 17.8 2626.3 0.016 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.9 0.49 0.9 19 18.6 2626.3 0.016 0.0 0.4 0.0 1 0.8 0.47 0.8 20 19.5 2626.3 0.016 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.9 0.46 0.9 21 20.6 2626.3 0.016 0.0 0.5 0.0 1.1 0.43 1.1 22 21.4 2626.3 0.016 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.8 0.41 0.8 23 22.1 2626.4 0.016 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.7 0.39 0.7 24 22.6 2626.4 0.016 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.5 0.38 0.5 25 23.6 2626.4 0.016 0.0 0.3 0.0 1.0 0.36 1.0 26 24.6 2626.5 0.016 0.0 0.3 0.0 1.0 0.30 1 1.0 27 25.7 2626.5 0.016 0.0 0.2 0.0 1.1 0.24 1.1 28 29 26.6 2626.6 27.5 2626.7 0.016 0.016 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.9 0.18 0.9 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.9 0.13 0.9 30 27.6 2627.2 0.016 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.07 0.0 Elmin =1 2626.2 FROUDE A ft') P (ft) R (ft) V (ft/s) MAXIMUM D (ft) T (ft) Q (cfs) I DV' ElmaX = 1 2627.2 NUMBER OB CH 1 CH 2 OB CH 1 CH 2 OB CH 1 CH 2 OB CHI CH 2 OVERBANK VALUES = 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 ffl21.1 CHNL 1 VALUES = 1.97 9.5 27.8 0.34 6.69 0.49 27.5 63 CHNL 2 VALUES = 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 AVG SECTION VALUES = 1.97 9.6 27.8 6.59 0.49 27.6 63 CRITICAL FLOW VALUES = 274.8 665 Ground Points Shurgard Self Storage Entrance Driveway---AssumedWSEL ■ Left Channel Pts ■ Right Channel Pts 2629.0 -- ---- -- - -- -- i - 2628.0 m d 2627.0 Cu"Q. — O — j 2626.0 m W 2625.0 2624.0 0.0 3.0 6.0 9.0 12.0 15.0 18.0 21.0 24.0 27.0 30.0 Station (feet) Scour Analysis and Rock Sizing PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Date: 21l/2017 MAXIMUM ANTICIPATED SCOUR DEPTH (ZT) FOR SIMPLE CURVED AND STRAIGHT REACHES OF NON -REGIONAL SAND BED CONVEYANCES (form rev. 06/01/09) WITH LOCAL SCOUR AT ABUTMENTS AND BRIDGE PIERS W/O LOCAL SCOUR AT DROPS OR LONG TERM DEGRADATION Rancho Reina Project Address flOOpCONTROi Carl Larson Data Sheet Preparer Step 1. Enter Project Information. NIA NIA N/A N/A NIA Conveyance Subsection Step 2. Bend Scour? Enter N if no bend scour. SEC =1 1 2 3 4 5 Description If Yes, Enter a. a=J N I N I N I N N (deg) Bend angle (See BENDS tab) Step 3a. Abutment scour per SMDDFM? Enter N if no. ae =' If Yes, Enter ae & 0.. 0. = Step 3b. Abutment scour per HEC-18 (FHWA NHI 01-001 5/01)? L' = Enter N if no local abutment scour. K1 = If Yes, Enter L', K1, & 0. 0 = Step 4a. Pier scour per SMDDFM? bp= Enter N if no local pier scour. L = If Yes, enter Y1, bp, L, Op & RF. Y1 = RF = (Dp= Step 4b. Pier scour per HEC-18 (FHWA NHI 01-001 5/01)? a= Enter N if no local pier scour. L = If Yes, enter a, L, K1, K3, mp, Y1, Dso, & D95. K1 = K3 = q)p= Y1 = Dso = D95 = (ft) Length of abutment projected normal to flow (deg) Slope angle of abutment face from horizontal (ft) Length of abutment projected normal to flow (dim) Coefficient for abutment shape (See ABUTMENTS tab) (deg) Abutment angle wrt bank (See ABUTMENTS tab) (ft) Pier width, including anticipated debris blockage (ft) Length of pier wall (ft) Flow depth upstream of pier (blank = max depth) (dim) Reduction factor for nose shape (See PIERS tab) (deg) Angle of approach flow in relationship to pier wall (ft) Pier width, including anticipated debris blockage (it) Length of pier wall (dim) Correction factor for nose shape (See PIERS tab) (dim) Correction factor for bed condition (See PIERS tab) (deg) Flow direction with respect to pier wall (ft) Flow depth upstream of pier (blank = max depth) (mm) Grain size for which 50% of bed material is finer (mm) Grain size for which 95% of bed material is finer Step 5. Enter safety factor for local (pier, abutment) scour. SF = (dim) Blank = 1.3' text = 0 Step 6. Enter hydraulic characteristics for up to 5 sections in the blue fields below. HEC-RAS output may be pasted into RAS OUT tab to facilitate data entry. INPUT HYDRAULIC CHARACTERISTICS OF CONVEYANCE CALCULATED CHARACTERISTICS CALCULATED INDIVIDUAL SCOUR COMPENENTS (ft) V A T WSL ELMN SE Q Y,i YMAX F„ rc/T Zcs Za Zn ZLSP 2L.E ZLSP ZLSE ZLF ZT (fps) (ft') (ft) (ft) (ft) (dim) (cfs) (ft) (ft) (dim) (dim) SMDDFM SMDDFM SMDDFM SMDDFM SMDDFM HEC-18 HEC-18 00 V'A AR wskelmn Eq 8.3 Eq 6.4 Eq 6.6 Eq 6.5 Eq 6.9 6.11/6.12 Eq 6.1 Eq 7.117.2 Eq 6.3 1 1.0 136.2 65.6 2630.50 12628.00 1 0.0004 1 134 1 2.1 1 2.5 1 0.12 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00.0 1.0 1.3 2 0.9 146.1 66.5 2630.52 2628.00 0.0003 132 2.2 2.5 0.11 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1.0 1.3 3 1.1 116.9 64.6 2630.53 2628.00 0.0005 131 1.8 2.5 0.15 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1.0 1.3 4 2.5 52.0 63.0 2630.55 2629.56 0.0093 130 0.8 1.0 0.48 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1.0 1.4 5 2.3 57.2 61.9 2630.96 2629.86 0.0063 130 0.9 1.1 0.42 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1.0 1.4 HEC-RAS Cross Sections from ADOT Right -of -Way PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Date: 2/1/2017 MAXIMUM ANTICIPATED SCOUR DEPTH (ZT) FOR SIMPLE CURVED AND STRAIGHT REACHES OF NON -REGIONAL SAND BED CONVEYANCES (form rev. 06/01/09) WITH LOCAL SCOUR AT ABUTMENTS AND BRIDGE PIERS W/O LOCAL SCOUR AT DROPS OR LONG TERM DEGRADATION Rancho Reina Project Address Ilotro[oi1TR6t Step 1. Enter Project Information. Step 2. Bend Scour? Enter N if no bend scour. If Yes, Enter a. Step 3a. Abutment scour per SMDDFM? Enter N if no. If Yes, Enter ae & 0.. Step 3b. Abutment scour per HEC-18 (FHWA NHI 01-001 5/01)? Enter N if no local abutment scour. If Yes, Enter L', K1, & 0. Carl Larson Data Sheet Preparer N/A NIA N/A NIA N/A Conveyance Subsection SEC =1 6 7 0 Util Box 0 Description a=J N I N I N I N N (deg) Bend angle (See BENDS tab) aN N N N (ft) Length of abutment projected normal to flow 0: N N N N N (deg) Slope angle of abutment face from horizontal L' = K1 = e= ©©IIIIIIIIII©©© (ft) Length of abutment projected normal to flow (dim) Coefficient for abutment shape (See ABUTMENTS tab) (deg) Abutment angle wrt bank (See ABUTMENTS tab) Step 4a. Pier scour per SMDDFM? by = N N N N (It Pier width, including anticipated debris blockage Enter N if no local pier scour. L = N N N N N (ft) Length of pier wall If Yes, enter Y1, bP, L, Op & RF. Y1 = (ft) Flow depth upstream of pier (blank = max depth) RF = N N N N N (dim) Reduction factor for nose shape (See PIERS tab) OP= (deg) Angle of approach flow in relationship to pier wall Step 4b. Pier scour per HEC-18 (FHWA NHI 01-001 5/01)? a = N N N N N (ft) Pier width, including anticipated debris blockage Enter N if no local pier scour. L = N N N N N (ft) Length of pier wall If Yes, enter a, L, K1, K;, 0p, Y1, Dso, & D95. K1 = (dim) Correction factor for nose shape (See PIERS tab) Ky = (dim) Correction factor for bed condition (See PIERS tab) 0 p = (deg) Flow direction with respect to pier wall HEC-RAS Cross Sections from ADOT Right -of -Way Y1= (ft) Flow depth upstream of pier (blank = max depth) Dsu = (mm) Grain size for which 50% of bed material is finer D95 = N N (mm) Grain size for which 95% of bed material is finer Step 5. Enter safety factor for local (pier, abutment) scour. SF =1 1.3 1 1.3 1 1.3 1.3 1 1.3 1 (dim) Blank = 1.3; text = 0 Step 6. Enter hydraulic characteristics for up to 5 sections in the blue fields below. HEC-RAS output may be pasted into RAS OUT tab to facilitate data entry. INPUT HYDRAULIC CHARACTERISTICS OF CONVEYANCE CALCULATED CHARACTERISTICS CALCULATED INDIVIDUAL SCOUR COMPENENTS (ft) s v A T WSL ELMN SE n. YH YMAX Fu rC/T ZGS ZM ZA ZLSP ZLSE ZLSP ZLSE ZLF ZT E (fps) (ft') (ft) (ft) (ft) (dim) (cfs) (ft) 00 (dim) (dim) SMDDFM SMDDFM SMDDFM SMDDFM SMDDFM HEC-18 HEC-18 00 C V'A A/r wsl-eimn Eq 8.3 Eq 6.4 Eq 6.6 Eq 6.5 Eq 6.9 6.11/6.12 Eq 6.1 Eq 7.1/7.2 Eq 6.3 6 2.8 48.1 55.5 2631.33 2629.98 0.00790 136 0.9 1.3 0.53 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1.0 1.4 7 3.9 33.1 70.6 2632.32 2631.68 0.04838 130 0.5 0.6 1.01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1.0 1.6 0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 Util Box 2.9 5.8 13.0 2631.85 2631.35 0.0010 17 0.4 0.5 0.77 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1.0 2.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 \ Se Conservatively Estimated at 0.1% (So=1%), as WSEL in ADOT ROW Submerges Calculated WSEL at Utility Boxes Results in More Conservative Scour Estimate (Zt) Mannings Cross Section at Utility Box Location in Channel Adjacent to Rams Field Pass 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 w°1 2.5 o2.0 O 1.5 w C, 0.0 0 1 2 2.9 ft/s IX. STABILIZATION STRUCTURES Side Slope = 3:1 or Flotter Stone Weight = 165 Ibs per cubic foot a � 4 � 14 4 5 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 15 17 18 19 20 VELOCITY (feet per second) SOURCE : SIMONS, LI & ASSOCIATES, INC. (1988) FIGURE 9.1 RIPRAP DESIGN CHART 9.03 OPOJ�lEY gR/20 w `9 "'OUNDED Ag11' Town of Oro Valley Community Development and Public Works March 15, 2018 Kenneth Perry, P.E. Perry Engineering 505 West Wetmore Road Tucson, AZ 85705 Re: Big Horn Commerce Center, OV1700950 Final Site Plan, Final Landscape Plan, Final Rainwater Harvesting Plan, & Preliminary Drainage Report: 4th review Dear Kenneth, The Development and Infrastructure Services Engineering Permitting Review Department has completed the fourth review of referenced Final Design submittal package and has deemed this plan set "Approved". The engineering review, and the comments provided, are to verify general conformance to applicable requirements of the Town of Oro Valley, including applicable Standards, Codes, and Ordinances. However, it is the responsibility of the Registrant, sealing the plans, to certify the proposed design meets all Town of Oro Valley Standards, Codes and Ordinances, including any applicable County, State and Federal Standards and requirements. If you have any questions, please contact me at (520) 229-4823 or mmiller6a�orovalleyaz.gov Sincerely, 0 Marvin Miller Engineering Design Reviewer Town of Oro Valley 520.229.4823 Oro Valley, it's in our nature. 11000 N. La Canada Drive, Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 www.orovalleyaz.gov I phone: (520) 229-4800 1 fax: (520) 742-1022 OPO'4PLLEY AA/A "'OUNDED A91� Community Development and Public Works April 6, 2018 John Hucko Ken Perry Landscape Architect Perry Engineering 5236 N. Stonehouse Place 505 W. Wetmore Road Tucson, AZ 85750 Tucson, AZ 85705 ihucko789Ca)-comcast. net kperry(a)perryengineerinq.net Re: Final Landscape Plan, RWHP, NPPP/SRI Big Horn Commerce Center Approval Letter, OV1700950 Dear Gentleman, Thank you for submitting Mylars of the aforementioned plans for Big Horn Commerce Center. The Mylars are signed and available for pick-up from the Community Development and Public Works Building, 11000 N. La Canada Drive. Please process them and the approved Final Site Plan with Pima County Addressing for annotation. Upon completion, please return the original Mylars, along with a complete PDF copy of all the approved plans (FSP, FLP, RWHP and NPPP/SRI) to the Town. If you have any questions, please contact me at msimms(o),orovalleyaz.gov or 520-229-4836. Best regards, y'ta -`% Milini Simms Senior Planner msimms(a)orovallevaz.aov 520-229-4836 CC: File o +P``�Y AR�zo TOWN OF ORO VALLEY o �DEVELOPMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES DEPARTMENT 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE, ORO VALLEY, AZ. 85737 PHONE: (520) 229-4800 FAX: (520) 742-1022 www.orovaIIeyaz.Qov/d1iis f vUNDED ti41` 1.2 GENERAL APPLICATION FORM Office Use Only OV Case #: OV1700950 Aoolication Tvae: ❑ Major General Plan Amendment ❑ Final Plat ❑ Rezoning/PAD Amendment ❑ Pre -Application ❑ Planned Area Development ❑ Zoning Verification ❑ Conditional Use Pen -nit ❑ Sign Criteria ❑ Zoning Code Amendment ❑ Sign - PAD Exemption ❑ Conceptual Site Plan ❑ Master Sign Program ❑ Conceptual Public Art ❑ Communication Facility — Tier 1 and 2 Minor ❑ Conceptual Architecture ❑ Communication Facility — Major U- Final Site Plan ❑ Revised Development Plan ❑ Conceptual Landscape Plan ❑ Other Subiect Property Information: Address: 11276 U, 0 r- le RO!R Parcel/Tax Code: 7- Z 0 � 041-010 r � ZZ0_ OY- 010R Subdivision / Commercial Center Name: ,� tto r')1 1+ Book / Page or Sequence Number: )P0. Legal Description: 5 C.T R L PT hi 5 2 S V� Lot Number(s) is A RA- Mb R b 2.. 9 t ke— See-S*_ Section/Township/Range: Sec • 8 or t2 S i R ll4 C Area of Property: .3• Z 51 AG. Existing Land Use: dOJJt 1 1 A Codrl f Proposed Land Use. GOM *I a re;q I Applicant Information: If more than one, attach list Applicant *-. Name: KeA Firm. Pf r rye in e C% lvyq Address:.505 VQ. tree b"C t k0ctA City. Tu S o G'1 State: A2 Zip: 8" O S Telephone.��2 CZO ` �� 7O Fax: Email: }� 'ry Pr Y }/Grip t Yf} , p7ef Property Owner(s) if different from Applicant *: }� Name: f o � f-4 S01 E r S b tl v-6 Firm. 6;19 {'V r n �jllf G► G� ,�'% LG Address: b I5O N• O ror c-1 a Kc� • 5yi tt City: 7VC-5 a!J State: Zip: s O y Telephone j?_AV I %G -709 Fax: (5W 71Z'33-TEmail b '+ .t bs-1j r r zo n Or • C_0 w Consultant*:54mr- cy e!W fiCgnt (Discipline) Name: Firm Address: Telephone: Fax. R City: Email: State: Zip. 2 M� O «4 �•4 40 h N O w swim NOT 4,OP0 Lt. z1010, [s tr> •il C rOTA N !r•i . a !�o (M +}et 04,11 ill Mx IT!. PWMDAT7 f -QGMPG.9M• MA TH£ SW 1/AId-MCcr 4 �/� or SLCTIDW 9 Y Rm� � �y� R4A S CA 7 VAm ; B BM(RL�C• •AFA i. y i A iD90/.7S'M/ "IA K IYN Nf .- 1- ti B 1t ILSa ►0way. aNilJr1, 4 att: s-f6oe " "At a or 5 F GENERAL NOTES LEGEND I. SAOW AREA OF DEVEAPMBNT 15 32 K ACRES 21. FIRE HYDRANTS WNHWTED TO AN APPROVED WOVE NET BULDINS AAA- 2T4C5.42 SF. '.A' FPLY OF ISO06PH FOR FIRE PROTECTION, EITHER BALVINS ROOF OvrLm TE FOORRARY OR PERMANENT SHALL BE INSTALLED AND N 2 ZOINS C4 SERVICE PRIOR TO COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS DELIVERY RETAINING, WALL — TO THE SITE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION OFFICE _ S. OILDINS GROSS SOL)AW FOOTAGE. 24p25 If. 7RAL M ARM CaSIDERM COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS. LADxAPG KILL I -zaz-c-c 4. PARKINS KEiIIRQ•IDRTS. REFER TO SHED 2 OF 2 FOR 26. APPROVED FIRE APPARAM ACCESS ROADS, SHALL CC PENCE CALCa INSTALLED AHD IN SERVICE PRIOR TO COEU5TIBLE 51DEWK/PATO RESTALRANT - 6000 SFAOO • 60 MATE UAL DELIVERY TO SITE SEVERAL RETAIL . 22FI6S SF/tso - 41.44 DECORATIVE CONCRETE - - - TOTAL FARING REONRED . 152 SPACES 24. TEWORARY STREET SIGNS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT EA TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED . 62 SPACES STREET 6RIEItlELTN7N MEN C,"TPWT10N OF N9N War, LIE ON SITE STANDARD PARKINS SPACES MEASURE 4'X20' POAOMYS ALLOYS PASSAGE OF VBNCLB.LL A FAN. COMPACT PAWNS SPACES MF-ASM AIMS'. 571WTRES =M CONSTRIICTION SWILL BE CLEARLY (FJ PATER UNE — W— HVIDICAPPED PARWNB SPACE MEASURE B7R2O FOR VEN IFIED NTH AN APPROVED ADDI@Ya. ONE SPACE MAW MR TWO ADJACENT PAMUNS 0 PUBLIC, ` R —(�— SPACES. PA M SPACES HILL NOT @GROAC4H LPCN A 30. THE DEVELOPER HILL CONTACT THE CEPS ORO VALLEY RC-LURED AND - O:FEt1'ARD. PARKINS 5PACE BRANCH TO COHE C ORDINATE TPLAER OF THE PRIVATE SEER LIE �— ENCROACHING LPON A SIDEWALK NL.L NAVE A MWI IN) V M 1.50>050 AND O rAN THE NY%SARY AFFRO MA CLEARANCE BETYEIEN THE OVER*~ AD THE END OF LEI SMN SEER MANHOLE THE SVE YANK FOR PEDESTRIANS 51. THIS PROJECT WLL HAVE O E)XISTNS AND 150 PROPOSED PASIDAMOR FU(71.RL LIT IWIVALIN(S PER GAS METER 6M PROPERTY DEVROR/BNT STANDARDS C-I COMENCAL �K( DISTRICT TAaE 020,045 m IN PIMA COIMTY CODE 15.20O450 SEMM CLEAN= GD FLOOR AREA RATIO, 2" - OPEN SPACE - 53.30% 32 A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PEI4T MST BE WXAAW FROM FMA COUNTY WA6TEA.TER MANAGEER 6143 LIE — 6- - TOTAL GROSS FLOOR AREA 4 M FEY LOT AREA BULON6 VOLUME RATIO DEPARTMENT BEPOIEE BEGINNING AWN WORK ON THIS PROJL-OT TOP OF PARAPET TAP. - OPEN SPACE- 47226 SF. - 33.50S NET LOT AREA WATER PETER,- AGGREGATE AEA OF THE BUILDINGS - 20A6R NET LOT AREA $3. THE OVER WLL ALLOCATE RH OF THE COSTRWTION C45T FOR RELI. AAT AS OUTLINW N ORD VALLEY SANITARY SEER MANGLE 0 - THE GROSS FLOOR AREA OF ANY ONE STRUCTURE DOB NOT IMEED MOOD s•. ZONING, CORM PEV5® TELEPHONE PEDESTAL �T BLLDINGG HEIGHT- 25 Fr. 34. PRONwTED ISM TOTAL OPEN SPACE PROVIDED- 47226 5F. CROSSED OUT PER HERB SUDODTH• 16/BS/2007. - KE488 FOR BOARDING - AUTOMOBYt PARTS STORE GUY NRE 6. B4515 OF BEARNG3L - GROCERY STORE FOM7 CM I� BE THE BEARING OF 54T14S2'E ALONG THE CBITBAM: OF - NVROVIARE STORE PO,N POLE O RAMS FIELD PASS ROAD, AS SH OM IN ALTA SURVEY BY DAVID L PLR, RLS Od4, ENTITLED'ALTAAC5V4 LAD - CLINIC KIM URGENT CARE FACILITY - FLN31A_ CHAPEL WAITER VALVE TITLE SURVEY, PORTIONS OF SECTIONS 5 16, T125, RI4F 64504, FMA COMM ARIZONA". DATED 4LY 23. 2D02. - MOTE. OR NOTE_ - THEATER FORD MON68NT AS NOTED O - CONVENIENCE LBO FAST FOOD 1. ELEVATION VAILM, - CAR WA6140 7EF.PHOE PANEL 8 A 5• AL16NP4 DISK ON EAST BARRIER FALL - INDOOR RECREATION SIGN T APPROXIMATELY 2N ABOVE ROAPMY AT THE - ALTO DETALN6 SORVEAST COWER OP THE ORACLE ROAD BRIDGE CORNA NOT FolD - OVER TIE CANYON OM ORO KAM PIKA CLINTY 55. M IN-M FEE EMAIL BE PROVIDED FOR A CONCRETE SET VT REB•wAR, RLS 2-"AWC BENGHM(NAw 06) ELEVATION • 26320E FEET. SNC6tALK ALONG ORACLE ROADS. WT TO RENER BY THE TOWN ENGINEER AND THE PLANING AID SO INS 6. NOTE, THE DOLMARY AS SHON WAS RIE-ESTAOUSN® ADMNISTRATOR - r7RADIN6/U'fILIY PLANS MNS THE ALTA SURVEY COMPD COMPLETED BY DAVPUTT, RLS OOP, DATED 4LY 25 2=Z AND CODITON OF 56. PROVIDE SFCUOTY BARRIERS FOR THE DETENTION TITLE AMENDMENT I40003022-T BY FIDELITY NATIONAL BASINS PER PCOOT 5.6.2 BASIN REW"UM NTS EOISTNS PROPOSED TITLE AGENCY, NTH All EFTWTIVE DATE OF JANARY 27, 2004. 37. ROOF TOP MECIAHICCAL EQM"W 5NALL D SCIE REV TOP OF WALL ELEVATION 4. DEVELOPER NLL COVENANT TO HOLD TORN OF OPEC)ICI gryR R VALLEY, ITS SUCCE550R5 AD A5516145 HAAMMS N BOROM OF WALL ELEVATION lT`xa�` THE EVENT OF FLOODING GlTI[R ELEVATION IMMED 10, DRAINAGE WLLNOT BE ALTERED, DISTURB® OR OWTR)CTW W TGIR TE APFRO✓AL OF THE ORO GRADE BREAK l l VALLEY TOWN CaMIL CRIB 11. PROPER" AY>aIATION WLL BE FORMED TO ACCSf N611 MINT RESPONSABILITY MR MAINTENANCE CONTROL, SAFETY AND LIABILITY OF PRIVATE ON>.VNAEBIAYS, DRAINAGE LON POR47 EASM4DI S AND CO4GH AREAa. E�RAIE GRAILS ELEVATION M DEVEO'HEIT PLANS M.L. Be SIR6TTED FOR Y,OMTERLIAL LOTS OR PADS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF P W GRADE FO-2544AI ANY PE4lT5 BY THE TORN ENGINEER AND/ OR BLLDIN O OTICIAL- MEN FLOOR ELEVATION FFE-255n 5. ANY RELOCATION, MODIFICATION, ETO, OF EXISTING UTILRIES ANDIOK PUBLIC MPROVE I Ni9 Rl'ONEED BY SPOT ELEV. BY AEOAL SURVEY 2672.E 745 DEVE ORJBIY WLL BE AT HG COWS!! TO THE FOMD sLRVEY Wow PLIBLIC. W. ON-SM SANITARY SEERS WLL BE PRIVATE AND WLL SLOPE INDICATOR Y Y eE CONSTRUCTED. OP ATEO AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS. THE LOCATION AND METGO ON CONFLTON TO AN MST1NG RELIC SANITARY SEVER 5 SLSPCT TO REVEY AND APPROVAL BY THE PMA KETANW PALL C4MY KASTEKATER MANA6@EM DEPARTMENT AT THE TM OF 51.113MTTAL OF PILMENG OR ELUDING, MANS. FtoY LOVE 5. ANY KASTEYATER DISCNAR6® INTO THE PUBLIC DIRECTION OF FLOP SANITARY SEYERAGE SYSTEM SHALL MEET THE REOLIIREENTS OF THE INDUSTRIAL PWTE ORDINANCE FATIO PALL (P64A YCONTY ORDINANCE No. WI-140, AS AMENDED). 16. ROODPLAIb ARE NOT TO BE ALTERED OR FILED. ROCK RP -KM M TICHATE R COMPANY THAT NLL SERVICE INS STORM DRAIN PIPE m DEVELOPMENT 5 METROPOLITAN DOMESTIC WATER WPROVEBR DISTRICT STOW DRAIN WANGLE IS. ASSESSORS, TAX PARCEL 5 0 220-04010M 6220-0401OU PORTION) CATYM BASIN W CURB K NO LIMY POLES SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONE TINE EASTERN PARKING MY AGAINST M FEgmTA . CATCH BASIN W APRON GRa W USHHtSS, To BE PROVIDED. CATION BASIN NO APRON 20. ALL TRAM ENCLOSURE AND LOADING ZONES TO BE COMPLETELY SCREENED FROM THE A04ACZ NT CORRIGATED METAL PPE — — U ES, RESIDENTIAL USES, 21. APPROVED IMPROVED RAMS AND APPROVED GRADE SPEAK LIE - — — - AELiRAK'% NLL BE RBWIR W PRIOR TO WAN CE OF GRADING PERMTS ASPHALT PAVB'Bli 22. M PROPERTY OMEN, HIS SIX415 S OR ASSIEI5 A64UE TO 0 KEEP ALL. REOLIRM LANDSCAPED AREAS EIST. PUBLIC SEN@R LAC —(E.?•S— MAINTAINED N A P� FREE TRASH FREE CONDITION, 2) REIACCE Me DEAD RANT MATERIALS WTWN 40 DAYS, AD 3) MAIWAN THE! IRRIGATION SYSTEM IN PROPER 6' PVC PRIVATE GENEVE LIE PARKINS ORDER. 25. THE APPROVAL OP THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN SHALL Be EFFECTIVE FOR TWO YEARS AFTER THE DATE OF APPROVAL 24. MUSH •FED DOB NOT APPLY ON SITE RATS FED PASS DESIGN VEHICLE 5 W-30. NWMM DESIRI SPEED OF 5 MFK 25. THE DEVELOPER SHALL PAY A FAIR SHARE FOR A 7RAPFIO SIGNAL AT THE INTERSECTION OF ORACLE ROAD AHD RAMS FIELD PAGE 26. NOTIFY BILE STAB 46 HORS PRIOR TO CONSTRICTION TO ESTABLISH THE EUOSTNS NATURAL GAS FACILITIES, LOCATED N A04A4W RO.K ITOWN OF ORO VALLEYI PROJ#: OV 1 205-23 ZONE: C - 1 I� NY� THIS '0' PROJECT LOCATION MAP A PORTION OF SECTIONS 5 1 6, T-12-5, R-14-E, WSRM MILE -------- ais I I I I W I ORO VAUEY I STEA/ I"RAWA PAD ORD VALLEY PAD ORO VALLEY I' I STATE �PAW I i I I RAMS CANYON DID vALLEr I I UNINIB PAAD I I ORO VNJ.EY I I I I N VICINITY MAP A PORTION OF SECTIONS 5 1 6, T-12-5, R-14-E, 615RM O SHEET INDEX I COVER 5HEET / OVERALL 51TE - MV. PLAN 2 DMV60PMHRT PLAN LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARZELS 220W41OM 4 A PORTION OF 220W-ClaJ A PORTION OF THE SOINRA T GARTER OF SECTION i, TOMEMP 12 SOAK RANGE N EAST, 61LA AND SALT RIVER MBRIDWR FMA COMTY ARIZoNA DESCRY AS Follow. COWBHCNG AT THE SMTW45T COINER OF SAID SECTION 5, BENS A FOUR 2-NEN ALWW OAR® PPE TEGE S 615321' E ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION S, A DISTANCE OF 01036 FWT TO THE EAST RIG -OP-MY LINE OF ORACLE ROAD (IWSGIIfI.OROKE N61411AY), BENS A PONT ON A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORT6E5T WTH A WIAL SEARING MICH BEARS N S7.OMS2' K THENCE AIONS SAD CARVE TO THE LET HAVING A RADM OF 5MFEET.12 FAND OT A CRAL ANGLE OF 4SR HSV M AN ARC DISTANCE OF 55632 FEET TO A MID NAIL, TA66M RLS S465T, BEING THE TILE PONT OF 1EO66DISH TEYCE N 41YO'42' K A DISTANCE OF 6W FM TO A SET TK• NAL AND N05413C TAGS® RLS 246TT, BEND ON SAID EAST RIGHTOF-wAY LSE OF ORACLE ROAD AND A POINT ON A CARV! CONCAVE TO THE NORT 45T, MTN A RADIAL WAM46 HiCH MARS N 4T'1055 K THENCE ALONG SAID CARVE AND R16NT-OF-HAY TO THE LET HAVING A RADIO OF "1501.12 FEET NO A CNIRAI. ANGLE OF 5•54S4 FOR M ARC DISTANCE OF 40461 FIST TO A SET 1/2-04C1H REEA, TAGGED R15 20-W, THENCE 5 46'05'YF E A DISTANCE OF 561AB FEET TO A SET I42-NC44 REBAAL TAGGED IILS 24WW, TEGE 5 46'04- K A DISTANCE OF 445-N PEET TO A GET V1-IUN ROBAR, TA66M RLS 24673', TEYE N 417041' K A DISTANCE OF 24466 FEET TO THE POINT OF 5FG046w. CONTAINS AN AREA OF 3254 ACRES. PROJECT PHASING 4TH QUARTER OF 2005- 10 MONTHS CON5TRUGTION PHASE 2 - IST QUARTER OF 2007- 6 MONTHS CONTRXTION OWNER/ APPLICANT BI6 HORN CENTER, LNG. BOB SOLFI5BL RG 6650 NORTN ORACLE ROAD TUCSON, AZ 65'104 OVERALL SITE PLAN SCALE, I•asa.a N PREPARED BY CONTOW INTERVAL - I FOOT ELL SASSOCIATES, ARCH. i PLANNERS O NJ A , 100 EAST 6TH STREET (. / TUCSON, AZ 55105 01-14-0 t. '(.GsLI,J,— BI6 HORN COMMERCE CENTER DATE KATAINN E OWELHt DATE FM COLNIY PASTEATM MANIA6EISIT OEARrAW DP BK 32 PG 27 SHT 1 OF 2 L KATRYN E CA AELIE R 04'. TAW CLEW TON OF OHO VALLEY. AZ, HEREBY cEaPr THAT THIS 5 THE IRE ND CORRECT DEVRORBR RAN AS APPROVED BY THE ORO VALLEY CONNCIL ON ob-01. 20o(6 A PORTION OF SECTIONS 5 / 8, T-12-5, R-14-Z 61SR54H TOPN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY ARIZONA ZONING C-1 COMMERCIAL DISTRICT SCALE 1'=60'-0' I FT. CONTOUR INTERVAL DATE. 10/20/2005 OV CASE NUMBER: OVI2-05-23 ✓4&,— BIG HORN COMMERCE CENTER ORACLE RDARAMS FIELD PA5510 TI050K AZ W704 LOCAnM NAP Sakellor Associates . a..H..... ..s •�.......... TTBT4 E.W-.r K 4 L.m aj '+von• usr IN) EAST SIXTH STREET -W--CK AZ • 63T05 PHONE, (5520) 622-4166 FAX, 6244452 EMAIL, Wit-lW4RI AROOM C015ULTANT, DMA ENGIEMN6, LLC,. 66O E LMOA VISTA -ONO VALLEY, AL - 66751 PROP (520) 462-4256 6--gh-hgo—t-t REVISIONS: DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 4/71=06 JOB ND.: 0402 DRAN BYJ W& ECF CHECKED BY, CN5 COVER DID-101 I OF 2 CIRO5r REFERENCE ND. C012-0-06 P1294-056 CARD VALLEY LASE No. OV 12-05-23 J F_ EASE•27"_�_ ORACLE Im R/H RAILING PER PC/GOT STD. -0' 2V-O' APROX DTL. 105 DNSE= 29J4 _ n PARKM6 OIANETUR PIPE la SLOPE R 0I00=12J CFS V- 25 FT/5 SLOPE- 0.4% 32h5 = 3264 RAMS FRW PASS 3'-0' RIP -RAP 10'O IA SLOPE 5 SECTION 5 SCALE, -0' �l D e' BUILDING EDGE FFE-3125 =2933 IE=26.45 / STEM HALL ¢ SECTION 4 GCALe ub',r-0 o a R I �J vRtvevAr I VL•EL=2914 E 26.- wP42AP IQ SLOPE SECTION 5 �� O D' 1 1300-N. F OPEN AREA CALCULATIONS V � SITE. I41,95260 SO.Fi = 100% \ \ 1 � \'+ryn�P v/ � aFEN AREA, aty6.00 sO.Fr. = 9990% CONSTRWTIoN 2D,9D5 SOFT. HOPE CU.VERi5ArID 24" PARKING CALCULATION5 EXIST \ \ \ . MR \ / PG,. 6vb6vin \ /iyj' l RIM=2698.96 BASED ON B1ILDING FOOT PRINT. ACNAL USAGE PER OCCUPIED SPADE TO BE DETERMINED. GROSS 5F. PARK/ SF. TaTAL RESTAURANT 6,000 5F. 10/I000 SF. 60 6ENBRAL RETAIL . 22,985 5F. 4/ IpN 9F -11.44 TOTAL PARKINS REMI = 152 R!-2634.11 TOTAL PARKIN& PROVIDED = 152 E U1V.=262234 \a\ \ K INV.=262=6 PAD R50'O. MIN. NLM551k OF AGGESIBLE 5PAGE5: MINING, I52/ 50 r I= 3 .. R EX15TINS ADA SPACES PROVIDED D SPACES 7Y,\ •\ \ ` RAMS CANYON PHASE III (b STAND. ADA t 2 ADA VAN ACCESSIBLE) `\\f02 BICYCLE PARKING!5" � or0 PROVIDE: 153/15=10.20SPACES 50 % CLASS I = 5 50 % CLASS It = 5 The Glass II bicycle pa k" shall be at My t d U ttye. zs c - LOADIN6 SPACES REQUIRED • Q 12.1 \ TOTAL 5F = 29025 COMMERCIAL LON INTEN54TY 43 ''. \ , A•I. EXI T. M.H. REQUIRED: 2 PROVIDED. 2 e QIOOc5.ld6 W.;�=2625:2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION DA=C.5830C PARCB5.22044010M t A PORTION OF 220-04010JW IUNNB I - A PORTION OF THE ST1a E5T aJART52 OF SECTION 5, 31513 'HT 3 \ � 4 '� PAD TOPW"P 12 SONN, RANGE 14 EAST, GILA AND SALT RIVER w: 29 14,9 5F. E`i! ZONING MERIDIAN, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. IAL EXISTIIY> C04ENCING AT THE SO)T1,64 iT CO OM OF SAID SECTION 5, \ RAMS CANYON BEING A FOLNIJJMINM D 2-INCH ACAPPED PIPE; �2 S FFE= 345 - - \ Mt BOO' 48 PAGE 81 ri@✓GE S 89'S3W E, ALONG THE 50JTH LIE OP SAID 32 _ 32b0 - �e ,c NIY��i 5TH I996 SECTION 5. A DISTANCE OF b9OW FEET TO THE EAST _. _. � FB - \ \ NOW -OF -HAY LINE OF ORACLE ROAD (11YbON-FLaRENGE 3225 N614NAY), GEMS A POINT A GUNGE, CONCAVE TO THE NOOg52' , WTII A RADIAL BEARING BEARS N ' .. : h • ;.."/ / �ep��`� e \ \\ � \ T ENCE ALONG SND CURVE, TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 39M.12 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 4'S45D' FOR AN I ART. 545"', E OF 33b32 FEET TO A FOAD NAIL, TAGGED = DISTANCE BEING THE 2 E POINT OF BEGINNING,, aM/�7N.K t N \ \ TENCE N 41.504Y K A DISTANCE OF 639 FEET TO A SET L�Y�R� 'PK' NAIL AND NASHE, TA66M 'RL5 298T3' BEING ON SAID NW I' SAWA T ` > \ \ \ EAST w6H -OF-HAY LINE OF ORACLE ROAD AND A POINT ON 4 A CURVE, CONCAVE TO TIE HORn&L3T, NTH A RADIAL 2 28j 'O• � \ \ \ \ BEARING, MCA Bii N 4T1059' K- `•' 0 LT'' 3311 - / / 4 3 \ \ \ THENCE ALONS SAID CURVE AND w6HT-0F44AY, TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADM OF 11112 FEET AfD A CENTRAL ANGLE _ 91 61 1 FFE= 3335 OF Y554 4' FOR AN ARC DMTAMCE OF 409bl MrT TO A 5ET irz-RCH MOAK TASGW'M5248'B•, PENCE 5 48.05'IT E. A DISTANCE OF 561.48 FEET TO A 5ET THENCE 5WOO TABBED AIS � 44531 FEET TO A SET 30.14 / 31 _ i. /� \ 1rz-INCH REBAR rPHErtD TiLS 29DT95 k , m 3024 BUILDI THEE N 41.50'42' K A DISTANCE OF 299bb FEET TO THE e J 12=26.43 a'-0' PONT OF 5B&I AREA / \\POINT Ia eaMMMCLiL 3 / of s.a9 AO1�5. E 5 \) \\\ 3235 ry� / /51.% / ��\\ LEGEND 3O7 _ %• j! \. \\\ \\ -(F)P' R/BLIC SEVER LINE -PUS- 6' PIG PRIVATE SEINER LINE ( FLOW ARROW �"•`' \\ a 4 30 •y / /� \ 11`- 101 (FJ GRADE CATCH BASIN FOR FIRST SER T ZONING `, f ® TREATMENT VIA FILTER INSERTS RAMS PAW MtPB0�91S51PA6I-10 /( E EXISTING DL'VE-0PED GRADE BREAK ZONING EXISTING '�. e Ad, •V Av-+... -`-=]MIJtCARD SELF STORAGE Low PONr DP BOOK 25 PAGE �2 M.N. / !'' I \.•• ❑ BVI NG \ / \ RIM•2628.19 �� N CONC. SIDEWALK E. INV.•2618.19 SITE'IPLAN H1NV=26829 \ % `� SCALES 1•=4O'-0 EXPOSED A6RE6ATF-D COLOR INTESRATE7 CONCRETE ol 517E HALL ® BIKE LOCKERS nfvn BIKE RACK --- -_ _- - nWNPQ/ APPI Ir.AMT BALDMG EDGE / CONIC. SIDBNN,K (TYPJ AC MIN ABC MIN MATCHSTING /..2 EXI GRADE 1 6' CONIC. VERT. cam (T7P. BOTH SIDE 1 SECTION I 0 b DP BK 32 PG 27 SHT 2 OF 2 oe»IPsm aRm N RMP 6NR1 R' nRCHv HanuTlw H1N RrcP I 11 I p I WHIM ` HIE eMMr81' KIICf W'11®E V6'Iff xwm�frm,I FDA RAMP N„ V BIG HORN CENTER, LLD, BOB SOLFISBURS 6650 NORTH ORACLE ROAD 7UG50N, AZ 55704 PREPARED SY SAKELLAR ASSOCIATES, ARCH, 4 PLANNERS G.N. DINO SAKELLAR, AA 100 EAST 6TH STREET TUCSON, AZ 85T05 DO HORN COMMERCE CENTER A PORTION OF SECTIONS 5 4 8, T-12-5, R-14-E, 64SRB4M TOM OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA GOUNTY ARIZONA ZONING G-I GOMNERGIAL 1215TRIGT SCALE I'=40'-O' 1 FT. CONTOUR INTERVAL DATE: 10/20/2005 OV CASE NUMBER: OV12-05-25 BIC; HORN COMMERCE CENTER ORACLE ROJRAMS FIELD PASS RD. TLCSOK AZ 85104 LOCATION MAP Sakellar Associates HO ]1e26 Gnstenht N. Seh Ur \0 •r \ 100 EAST 51XTH STREET'=50µ AZ • M05 PHONE: (520) 622-4166 FAX: 629-0952 EMAIL: WSISAKELLARCOM CONSULTANT: DMA ENSINEER146, LLC. 650 E LINDA VISTA -ORO VALLEY, AZ' bFEl PHONE WO) 902-9256 dr enyheernye ca,tmt REVISIONS: DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE, 4/ZI/20ob JOB NO,: 0402 ORAVN BY: CPA, ECF CHECKED BY: CN5 SITE PLAN 2 OF DF_lO� CROSl - REFERENCE No. c012-83-0S 10I2,11a-056 ORO VALLEY CASE No. OV12-O5-25 e- 0- G-wbiAL NOTES: 1. The grass area of the subdivision is 15.04 Acres (655,161 SF). 2. The numbs of roaMentLal lots /s A6. J. Approxh7ote areas: MP"6 Area C.A. 1 ' 44,0744, 6W DYahoge Areas (C.A. 79�) -- 22,846 SF Landscaped &,Mee Yards (C.A. GJ 12,894 SF 12,8Y4 Sr Landscaped Trod Access (C.A. O) -- 7986 SF 10X Coen Spore 65, 516 SF 84 380 SF (hduaes al1 of the oboes) Lewe 57ope (CA. f-) -- 7,999 Sr • The Recr#otlan Area provided complies with Section 4-305c of the Lino Vai/ey Zoning Code. 4. Total length of new public streets are 0.5 males. Total length of new private streets are 0.0 males. ar MIn,mum lot size Is 4269 SF. 6. A mroge lot size is 4904 &1.. 7. Moxxnum budding height - 18 feet. 8 Budding srotbocts are.• 20' Front; 10' Rears 5' Side if dwelling on odjncent lot (10' between buddAngs),• 0' 5/de if end lot. Comer lots may also be subject to setbocks Imposed by sight vfwb#lty requirements. 9. Each lot provides four off-street porkhg spaces for a total of 344 sppaces. Additionally, 5 off-street parkkrg spaces ore provided for the recreation area. 10. Existing zoning Is 7P by trans✓atkwal zoning goplkotlo n (OW-03-02) adopted by Moyar and Council on Moy 11, 200.T fie subject property was exempted under Ordnance (0)02-35 If annexed Into the Town. The subjNct property was annexed by vote of the Council on January 14 200J. Ihervtb e, demlopment is mode under R-4 zoning per the deleted Section 10-4018 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code. Proposed density is 5.72 dwsitigs per aae. 11. No further d/WsAn of any lot or parcel Mown will be done without the written approve/ of the Oro Valley Town Council. 12. fie area between 100-year flood /knits represents on area that may be sububct to flooding #-am a 10I0 year hequncy Rood and all land in this area w111 be r#atrkted to uses that ore compotb/e with flood p/ah management as approved by the Tower Engh#er. 13 the basis of bearing is the centPH47o of Rams Feld PasA as showers on the plot mop for Rams Canyon' and recorded in Book 48 of moos and plots on page 87. Said Bearing is N 473024' W. 14. The professional engineer of record shall certify as to the form, line and function of a// public and private roadways and drainage structures before the release of assurances. 15. The property owner, his successors, assigns or a deslgnoted Homeowners Assoclotion agrees to 1) keep oV1 requked /andscoped areas mointolned in a weed -free, trash -free conoI 2) replace any dead plant moterla/s within 90 dogs and 3) mohtaln the krigatiorn syvtem In proper working order. 16. The /andscop/ng owr the public sewer line with*? Common Area 8" between lots 29 and 30 .shed/ be In accordance with the planting guidelines of PC/COT Standard Detod #W A-4. 17. No permanent structures (l.& masonry waft Antes, etc.) may be constructed on or through the public sewr easements shown hereon without separate written COI of the Pkno County Wastewater Management Deportment. 18, Acknowfeagements mode before o Notary Public must conform to the requkwnnts of Arizona ReNsed Statutes JJ-505. 79. Prospective purchasers of lots 19 through 45 should be advised of existing ond/or possb/e future commercial development on commercially zoned adjacent art 20. poInageways wed/ be constructed according to approved plans prior to the issuance of any permits from the Town Engineer and/or Building Official for Lots 25and 26. 21. Garages shall constitute no more than 50x of the host facade of the house and the garages wall not project more than flw (5) feet In floret of the house. 22, fie setbacks for the houses shall wry so that no two units ore equally aligned. 23 The flnished floor elevation for lots 2, 3, and 4 shall be at or above 2632.01. 24. For basin maintenance schedule, refer to the approved Hydrology Report. APPROVAL: / FitN4t E Lkvtl ievClerk of the Town of Oro Valley hereby eerth5, that Mls plot was ryprowd by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro KWey an the A, day or -ram . 200.5. C - �v✓ own-% Cro V0#4y 14 -as a5 Dote Sr 7a oS Fk"o�y ona� e `fair -l.J a:1— _ )� - `.- y /3 6 Town n eer s ^ r / /� I5 Fee. 65 airs S&O a e ( k '2 5 aS Nbter utilty Dirverar • A ye th, of YAqpw c n e A #r, U.1;��Ah};e..l Y. FI a os recorded wen Docket 126�I pope 31 �1- has been prodded to yuanntee d%noge and street knprowments (InduCII monuments) and utd/ty knprowments (dectrfc, tw*hone, gap sewer, water) An this subdhiskn. by Assurances An the form of _ from h the amount o/ how been provided to guorontee the reawdkrg of this .subdAialon in the #wit the project is aebarsobod. No Mol Inspection Aar any lot within thls subd/Nsron shall be approved until o Budding Coder Of&lal has whFed that construction on the lot /s complete and s/devolks how been hstol/ed, property the to property the. DEDICATION: N1, the unobrs/gned, hernby warant that we are the owners and only portles hawNg any record title Interest In the land Mown on this plot, and we consent to the subdAlsiar of sold land /n the manner shown hereon. N1r hereby dedkote to the public all rlglhts-of-way Mown hares, includsng all streets. Utrily easements as shown hereon ore granted to the Town of Oro Vai/ey, PArno County, and all utdlty canpanl## for the purposes of access, ksstallatlon and mohtenance of pub/* eewerA utdltie; and other uses as deeignoted by this plot. Ok the unob &red our successors and assign; do hereby saw the Town of Oro 66✓/sy Its successors and assign; thew employe#; otf7ca-A and agents harmless bem any and all clokns for damages r*I to the use of sold lands now and In the future by reason of flooding, flowage, erasion, or damage caused by water, whether surface, flood or roink✓/. It is further understood and agreed that natural dsaksoge stroll not be altered, d,(sturbed or obstructed without approval of the Oro Valley Town Council. Private drohog#ways and common area; as shown hereon, are reserved for the private use and carvenlance of al/ owners of prWrfyy within this subdlWalon their guests and *7Wt##A and ore granted to the Town of Oro MCI Plena County, and a// utdlty cornponAxs for the purposes of oceesA Insta✓/atlan, and mokstnanee of public sewers, utdlUsA and other uses as designated by this plot. 77tio to the land of a// private drahageways and common areas shall be vested In an ossoclotlon of Ind(Wdual lot owners os es abllshed by covenant; condltlans and rastr✓ctions as recadd In Docket l 9 55 page In the offR:e of the Pino County Recorder. Each and every lot owner within the subdIoslon shall be o member of the association, whkh w1/ occept al/ nspons/bdliy for the contra; mointenancev safety and 1/a6d/ty of the private aFohogewa)e ond common areas w/thln th/s subdMslor, as shown hereon. Fid,11 ay Holland 7100 Agency Inc, an Arizona Corporation as Trustee under Trt usNa. 60,148 an/y an�not therwlae and not personally. V 03- Be. Vo-r7ha , Date State of Arizona ) S S: County of Plena ) On thls J & doy of A,,,tram 20OS' befaro me personally appeared naLnkv+ y //" A'- personally known to me (or proved to me on the bosh, of sotisfocta7• em'dOnce) to be the person *hose name /s subsrn6ed heron and acknowledged to me that he executed the same In h/s authorized cgpooltg and that by his signature on the Instrument the person or the nt/ty upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the Inssttrument. My Commission E.wkos t ry Public ;T RECORDING IIATL ANNOTATED COPY CERTIFICATION OF SURVEY / hereby certify that the boundary surwy as shown on this plot was prepared under my dkectkv, and that all existing or proposed boundary surwy monumntA and markers shown are correctly destirbed. Gegcry W. Bars, R.L.S (Az /35111) a Arrow Land .Survey Inc. 312/ E. klehoble Rd 35111 Tucson, AZ 85716 atDeAM W. 11ER URTIFICATION OF ENGINEER: / hereby certify that a// nghowIng work Indudkrg proposed htrior tot lines were reviewed ond shown under my suprvfs/on. I further certify that the 1010-year flood prone limits were reviewed and shown under my suprvis/n. t Lip/g A. Han P.E. (AZ /40221) 40221 EN7RANCO, /NC. C�TA. S 1860 E. River Rood, Ste MO a.v Tucsn, Arizona 8571E' PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE PROPOSED LOT LINES EXIST. RIGHT OF WAY LINES PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY LINES — SECTION LINE - CENTERLINES EXISTING EASEMENT LINES -- -- PROPOSED EASEMENT LINES —...—.. — 100-YEAR FLOOD LIMITS C•`. SET SLMY IIOhrAKNT (AS NOTED) ❑ FOUND BRASS CAP SURVEY MONUMENT (AS NOTED) ® BRASS GIP SURVEY MONUMENT TO BE SET ( FOUND SI.RYEY MOWUIIENT (AS NOTED) • MONUMENT TO BE SET (R) RECORD DATA (M) MEASURED DATA BCSM BRASS CAP SURVEY MONUMENT IR IRON ROD N&O NAIL AND DISK CA 'AIINA S1/14 f'A,4k ROUNDAKv / -KAMS CANYON der o P-A�Jn YON 5 -�e fi Mti C/�N)'2N .�-f TATFS (I-sJ -e 5 3.� O / RAMS L'ANYt)N 48;87 iFoonral:; '4' nzi are 71;5,bL55 PA, \ 'a YORO VAL I t r 1F7WN OMITS IACATION l(AP Sao/e. .1'-1 Male POR71OVS OF SECWA6 5 & 8, T12S, R14E GdSW,, PYAM COUNTY, AR/ZONA ACP V NAE ALUMINUM CAP V NO ACCESS EASEMENT i I BY THIS PLAT LOT ACCESS THIS SIDE RAMS' CANYON BOOK 48 PAGE 8,7 zoN 5 -.�.,- • „,,.;ter,. , M 4-SV 02 EE- wA 3P4.97 M)-- / N 9a FND. ALUM. CAP FIND. d IN CONIC. y2" REBA ,a f "PE 9651" "RLS 25405" Ifi a N _ N ZONC ZONECP/ a it it r i -� . ,..< «�; _ i err •I END. U CAP I ONC. END. 2" LEAD i E 65t' CAPPED PIPE SECTION CORNER 0 so so b<• v' o bs. 3>• iv :r z /gJ 6°0 �r0.'s0. Ar N LED11 TO RITHE SHEET NO- DESCAI 1 COVER SHEET 2 PLAN SHEET. LOTS 1-11, 37-56, 67-76 3 PLAN SHEET: L07S 12-36, 57-66, 77-86 FND. 1 112" OPEN PIPE H SECTION CORNER — FIND. 1" LEAD % CAPPED PIPE / NOT SELECTED r o _ FND. ALUM. C1 D• CAP IN CONC. / "PE 9651" J • r L/aB1M) \ / RECREATION AREA 1 Ca1Wd1 AREA A. SHEET 2 SKEET 3 er rr —1 O L'I r r I m r r / err jONE C- / u SHURGARD = SELF 5TORAGE .f/ err CA. W N47'24'56"W FND. Y2" REBAR "RLS 25405" TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PROJ#: OV 12-03-07 ZONE: —T— F:::" Adm. Address: 11201 N RAMS FIELD PASS CERTIFICATION OF LScURED ALTER SUPPLY. A certlflcvt/on of assured water suppty has been rwcWmd fen the Dkector of ft ter Resources. by D✓7 ��. I f• Df water iltifty vryffor Vate �is r r la m N d till i r �, r r p AY i /✓ Y I -- ----�—------J RAMS HOW MAIL (PUSIM) r err X r Ara err r 1/ jo // r/ C.A. V• P/MA GUUN/Y UNSURDKDED ZONE.' CP/ enSCAIE:ranco 1"=100' IM E MW war ass pop (5m) 7N-9= OV12-03-07 Tuow% Az erne 109- m FINAL PLAT FOR Rams Pass LOTS 1 THRU 86, and Common Areas 'A' (Recreation Area), 'B' (Drainage), 'C' (Landscaped Buffer Yard), 'D' (Trail Access), and 'E' (Levee Slope) ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA P0477CWS CF SEC77OVS 5 & Q 7725; R14E 0R5)4Ai, mWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZCNA --flTIrn - Y Anne acNCFD' 4-4-ens a/1EET 1 OF 3 a ANNOTATED COPY RAMS CANYON *1 GENERAL UTILIT FAC/L/77£S EST B��/� �%8 PAGE 87 �I DKT9815, P 08 1 ZO>N� PAD-�-� - �L� ---- --- - - - ' IN6 �� 70R 1N E�G E SAND , �O & UTILi7r EASEME T Z 1� NCYACCE S - - -`� - - -(1KT74 PG-8 DKT 7224, PC 1399 k Q - 1 - - - --- 0KT724,PG1387--�-- '� COMMON AREA 'A" 4((R)) / , .. "' -"' RAMS CANYON NRAMS FIELD PAS (50' PUBLIC FNn8K 48 PG 87 N51101� S4730'24"E"E (B.0.6.) 270.00' CAP I C NC.3058 \....-..._ E 9 1"S48'05'17653.80' R -- S48'05'02"E M 653.94' M _' ___ 7916' 94.92 : '( 85.89 1 6. 0-1 1 8.39' _ 15,09' 1 I 1' NAE ?3 C.A. "D' 1' NAE ,� I iN a! N4T29'19"W N4T29'19"W FND. Y2" REBAR I I �� 3o TI`" er, 76 10.117 7985 SF , 53474j3+E' rnl ¢6 5.079 S 29 I cV aij' 6,050 SF • �31Cz . ¢6.72', Q 5�2' S iG l \ 2$62 N77 '4 "RLS 25405� �I J *1 ao I 6.212 SF =1 34 - 11.17 r o .r �1 1? v 8.39 �L �54'2(1�6 E - I H�*1 - - 0-06"� - - 54518�7 € - J * � � � I � � � � ?s�, n ^,' C.A. "D" � - - �•14230 41 q' ' b �% L j - 88 - 7 1' NAE 1118 \� F ' \ r- I r N�85'- pF I---t1856'- 23' t:"I�41Q 1117 if L rn1 riA I 'A �O h' I r 4 • C.i W \ v(J1. iD_ 4,862 SF o0 29 �nlo %aJ 1119 � �' rn 81 4 j` 29 �I I 13 ®T� uj! � �n ,`� o •9i \ `'1 100-YR FLOODP=2 LIMITS Y J v of 5,136 SF Nly .t 5,262 SF 33 / it o 6-E- I h L S45" J N 1 iy + M co 3 �� 1` SCALE: 1`=20' L - 5,54'20 0 - L7 2 '3 6,820 Sr L _�¢29 �" _ �, 5.387 SF 15,023 SF uNi N ` \ 1 Q : r ro-i114i' - }-�I a,so5 � f 49 ® �2 /7 3z I _,_- 1g AZ' 6,060 SF o 29 , ' 29 In 1 �� 8 0 9 _ � 1 � . I I oI r .' 4,992 SF c, � 1 4 O?J � J � �I 6 E J 1 4,981 sF �,!� 8.39' 41 W C2 38 \a >. 100-YEAR 0o L_ " - L '0E-F'-54552�38_"€- -� N. N 5 P \ i��'1`j'• 1 \N m r. 1 ��FLOOD LIMITS V: --1N-.w' -I `10897- - _ `l'rn r. - - -107: 4&'- - -I „�• - _ N 9.72' 6 U £ r2, �g� / \�', r 4,905 SF I � J I r 29 I % 32 %� S41;SO06 E- l a� 5,411 SF `, \ 1� f ¢'? 28 J 4,90�SF N 5.409 SF 1 I� ` 152.21' a � �, 38 • 1 cJA FND. ONC. NAIL �54'20'�_'- --S54'260c J �h1 7410_ CS' n "' �� (cr PE 51 w \ 109 0(i 1 la, P3• 108 - 109 00 �" o '%o) , I � �g % u' 1 (- - I r - r 1 m 56' ESMT FOR MAINT. & o 4,905 SF r 28 Ig' I 37 I i I COMMON AREA 'A" r �� ��y1® 72 ® 6 EM£RC£NCY PURPOSES a � E BJ I WI 4,g04 SF J � �j 4.944 SF I I' I RECREATION AREA 1 M mod'' 37 5193 SSFF.* 1 1 DKT 7424, PG B9B s'`�4'24 L�54•20 �6"E - - S54'20-06�E- J 45 44,655 SF Z "' � 9�0 1 DKT 7224, PG 1394 109. I o h' `) 109 Od - - I 109"30' WATER £SMT 4,905 SF I r F 30 1 l0 23' 1 �1 z7 OI 52 27 %1® � % o N I 4,6 SF !� 0 4,905 SF I I 1�i ` 36 5,341 S � DKT 1OJ86, PG 2895 o �L _ �542006 E- J I a J �I -I I 1' 10' PUE GRANTED 1 j N 1 F� 2g 30' GAS ESMT UNDEVELOPED �j,/ L '�� -� `t _ s54'2oO� E I Q 1 s6 I I DKT 10534, PG JOJ z -109. 1 u BY THIS PLAT 1 L 2 1 .-I ZONE: CPI - - 109:e0 - - 1N o- - � ��, m TYP. � 4,905 SF sp / r - to ( - - o J i ^ is 8 p ¢O 26 I`1',' I I 6-,? 27 I`�' %� 29 I I� �I N 1 `, 1 r 39 5,065 SF I `.' o `01 lI �I _J \ I 4,904 SF J4 4.905 SF I b h p NI 1 Z6" � • L _ �542- m L S54'20'86'E �L S54.20-06"E- � � ��r '� �i ^m r---169. /I to L4 - 1098Q -� _---1098(i� - I rn > t� �I I �I 1�� u n ORO VALLEY �T - 4,905 SF ' m r I� I Io Q I= I i `� TOWN LIMITS o 39 2s Q' ^ 10' PUE 6 Iw I 6,9 28 I V 3 1 I I 28 4,904 SF g' 4,905 SF I h I p I 34 5,001�4 S5'1 _ SF E I 20 06"E- - J -06 E-� I O I o 3 S 1O I O 4, ` L ;S54' L S54'20 V I g- ' f � I rn . S OI 10' PUE I Z---� _ R1 I E IN u u 109• rn - 109OQ m r v I BASIN 1 I 1(321 I QI U r�B 4,905 SF 29I IO yIQ 4,904 SF 25 I�Or 49�� 29 I I� =I= I I �4 wl 34 5.06 I IU !m E- L_ S542d WII L 20�6 E L_ 2 E I I 23' I U L_ A154'20'Q6"W- , to 0=10'--� W I 'N61f 2a 2'27'Eol 4905 SF 0' PUE 24 7.8il® 0 49694,04 4905 SF I S542006E SF4 206�E 33 ,E 4I 54'}'408WL �L_53' 1 SF JI! . 109.00 109.00 MAT110.60 36 6-7� 66 � � 86 SEECSHEHLI�T 3 1 12 CURVE TABLE CURVE I RADIUS I ARC DELTA TAN C11 1 954.00' 45.30' 2'43'13" 22.65' C12 954.00' 60.94' J'39'36" 30.48' C13 954.00' 45.85' 245'14" 22.93' C14 954.00' 45.48' 2'43'53" 22.74' C15 954.00' 51.68' 3'06'14" 25.85' C16 954.00' 15.83' 057'03" 7.92' C17 204.00' 66.27' 1836'50" 33.43' C18 25.00' 44.92' 1025737" 31.41' C19 1 60.00, a09, 7'43'19" 4,05' C20 60.00, 10.07' 93649' 5,05, C21 60.00' 31.63' 3072'19" 16.19, C22 60.00' 30.44' 2903'55" 75.55' C2J 60.00' 18.59' 17'45'15" 9.37' C24 803.00' 26.27' 152'18" 1314' C25 80300' 43.58' 306'35" 21.80' C26 1 803.00'1 45.50' 3-14'48" 22.76' CURVE TABLE CURVE RADIUS ARC DELTA TAN C27 803.00' 41.80' 25858' 20.91' C28 803.00' 43,60' 306'39" 21.80' C29 803.00' 45.33' 314*04' 22.67' C49 757.00' 259.13' 193648" 130.85' C50 25.00' 28.36' 645948" 15.93' C51 25.00' 39.27' 90'00'00" 25.00' C52 204.00' 1 Z84' S 00'42' 8.93' C53 204.00' 4Z80' 132533' 24.01' C54 158,00' 45.42' 1628'16' 22.87' C55 158.00' 21.01' 737'11' 10.52' C56 25.00' 39.01' 8924'17' 24.74' C57 25.00' 39.53' 1135'4J" 5.26' C58 25.00' 36.54' 834504" 22.41' C59 25,00' 42.00' 9674 27.89' C60 1 25.00' 1.96' 4;el2'1 0.98' STREET CENTERLINE CURVE TABLE ND. LENGTH I RADIUS ITOTAL ANGLE C100 15.15, 181.00: 04'47'42" C101 43.10' 181,00' 1 13'38'33' C102 76.10' 181,00' 24.05'28" C103 336.70' 780.00' 1 24.43'59" LINE TABLE LINE LENGTH I BEARING Li 20.00' S4222'30"E L7 21.80' S4800'33"E L8 10,00' S62'20'39"E L9 35.00' N6920'25"W �� OO AS TO AS TO SURVEYING ONLY ENGINEERING ONLY GPE Y W. 11 II BAUER140221 HUN7 • SIT• SIDE YARD SETBACK DUE TO SITE NSIBIUTY TRIANGLE *HERE APPLICABLE. SEE LINE TABLE, � (� E 1 1 `"11 11� "'11 �' 1 1F' 1 1 \ 1 \ 2O' FRONT 20' FRONT STREET ROW END OR CORNER LOr MlTERIOR LOT TYPICAL BUILDING SETBACKS SCALE: 1 "=40' 00 enlranco MOO E. ft- R4 &AN 300 (Sao) M-87M OV12-03-07 T.01M AZ S"S Im (5M) 2W-5m FINAL PLAT FOR Rams Pass LOTS 1 THRU 86, and Common Areas 'A' (Recreation Area), 'B' (Drainage), 'C' (Landscaped Buffer Yard), 'D' (Trail Access), and 'E' (Levee Slope) TUCSON, ARIZONA PCW77CWS OF 5EC77CWS 5 d• Q 7125 R14E CA:S)RM, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA SCALE: 1"=40' $MEET 2 OF 3 ANNOTATED COPY LINE TABLE LINE IENGTN BEARING _ L721.41_ N89.08'10'W L3 38.95' 5757439'W _ L4 2.99' 5852L448"E L5 25_95' - N717232E l6 _ 70.50' S297?'Oi'f. NO 3095' N4612'27"E OQ 111 - 10.00' N48.095E 2009'-53622'48'E 115 J3.00' N09.56'28'W 20.14' _ _N_4236'09'E 34.49' SJ_15_8'S5'E _11.44' 9-5-RI_OS"W 32.19' S4723'5l'E BASIN ' 1 I 11 I �; L20 11,74' _ S31_58$5'E MATCHLIN 14.80' 1 121 5826 _., S515173E SEE SHE T 2 S54-ZUC "E 2006E t � 6"E �,� $54' � L22 4114' N42T)449"W �mnn»nnr» S5420'0 I S54'20'06"E 4.2006•E 100.43' NI^ 93.00 I 4 N54-20'O6+W - mnnn 109.00 rn I 551�.00• ..I o, �I � 1 r-� of 3o I I°o _ _i10, I �o N N..-_ 4,905 SF� I d I 5'J 24 26 N �j - M M ®1 I� �I 1 �Iv 'I BO '� I c� 2J 10' PUE 1-9 11 III i� STREET CENTERLIN 1 10' PUE- lr- (�j o� I 4,904 SF I j I I 5 550 SF 2, I 5 033 SF I o I 4 991 SF I, d 4: 0 4,905 SF I I I 32 • I I o ff. / r?�E N �1 ..5542006E � 3 IfR f No LENGTH RADIUS TA J ` CURVE TABLE �00' I �;J L S5,470'O6 E ! �I _S54.200fi EPUE t $54'2606"€- -- E_I o L ANCLE l _ N54'20'-06 W o o - TO , ^ __ _ _ - . "jx I II C103 336.70' 780.00'_ 24 43'59" j 1 22 ro ^+ 109.00' 10 00' I -. tp2p3 c- 9515 " - 111:31 rn 'rm�mnrn; I 4,905 SF� m ( o 109. 2s I rn ry f to ( o I II JO' A5IOJt- IT 2895 / I Iv Q I' I 65 I `In1 rnI 1 4, 9B 25 Ia o� 85 30 �rn -\ �I 31 5,02 SF 1 c, I 30'l GAS fSMT 3 35 ti,10 I 5B 23 I ��« I h I I 4,904 SF __ D 05 C 303 CARD ` L. ._ ..5�542006 E 4,905 - l. 55420'U6 E 06'E 3 b v`O� € v . L. _ S54'2D h I ..S5420'06" _J v� - $54U O6'€ ' my I p1y120'06"M1 J N Kl 1 34 P tE TAB _ i09• m , U3' "v { - 111.67 I LE SE(F STORAGE � I- oo' 22 I o o 1r3g.00 `gig,-109.0o- --I W to2. - I - - ZONE: GPI �* 4.905 SF® 1( h I 1 �'o I I to V I b ( % 25 ( �5 310' PUE 1 30 1¢ I CURVF RADIUS ARC DF11A TAN z o S..� O I 59 22 �'I`g o, 6`1 24 O h I 4,592 SF PV: p 8'¢ 29 I ^ {p 4,992 SF 1 ' Ci- _ 25400' __ 77,89'-17J4J6' 3976' rnnn�nnr-nnnr �1 , J I 4,904 SF .°�I o 4,905 SF r 01 II 4,290 SF I I - C3 _ 254 00' _- 46 33 102707" 2323', E _ I $542406"E I I c� `� l_5542UO6"E - EJ 0)I` p6�N 1 +^ f ND.�CONC. NAIL l_ S54'20'O6" - - _ _ $B4'29 �� ( N54'20' C4 346 00 45 92 73616" 22.99, 109:00 I� 23' OQ �� _ �7 _. -- yQ2.03' - ( I O 'PE 651 " CS_ 346 00' 4613' 73818' 2J 10 1p9 _.._-1g9.00._.....I io. �I rn - 9534' "I--10983' I z1 0 - io o ' 1 to e� Q F.. Ie 100 AR C6 _ 34600' _ 5110' _ 82742" 2560 Cf / asol sF 1 a ^� I 21 - I 2a 80 24 C . L 29 83 1 �9 e o 300 15 I� - 0 33 5.96J 60 ®I,� oy 6.�� I I 4,528 SF Id o®4,290 SF I :� h` �,029 SF / I -fL00D L.f/TS C7 34600' 415 04111 20T I / I ^I 4,815 SF E o 4,905 SF I 1 J 0 I pIl : C8 954 00' _ 42 39 232 44 21 ?0' IFt'D 107.6i•E ' i M6 �.._ .S54'2 ..I l .. S`�4'2 ' o y' 2J• 3 ---I L. 554'2006' CO Q �70' N5420' 1 ), L:-.139.01' (M C9 95400 __ 4601- _ 24547 2301. l S54'2d 1106" `Z 006"E ( L._.S`a4'2(>06" v E � OCi - 23' w 1 , 1.=139.03' ,R _ ' "I Lv 109'00 *� _-'1- 0 1 $1'S5' #4,0 ` o I R=336.00' _ - C10 954 00 45 59 24418 ?2 80', g8.49- 95 34' - 1 rn v i- 107:62 J ) TORAGE 1 0l 4,562 SF ! a'ry b • o*T 61 20 62 23 Ir *! 81 23 h o,E 27 82 j `t _��I oM' 29216' I ( ) _ L ) C30 80300; _ 4572_ 315432286: 0 o h'h 1 � -23-42'28" R p- 23-42'14" M 5,382 SF I`n 5,370 SF 1 I ` i 5,223 SF pn 4,722 SF I I 4,752s W I rl \ C31 _ 80300 f0.5T - O'45'15" ____5.28: loj I 1 NAE 1 v y/ • I \ I vl 1' NAE I z ( I 2(f06 C31 6000 204T 193138' - 1033' .S542006E 0 N L21�y ., r L2 4,.._N514' FND. CONC. NAIL __i _ s �L_ ? �2.5i -7084 ___ I 45 - C33 6000 3278' 31I755" 168I' Q ❑' ro o A ❑ J I PE 9651" \ I 20 95.39 i o �'� 43.73 27.69 / C34 60.00. _ 3051' 290755' _ _1559' 4,269 SF 1 N co 28 r% 1v C35 6000' _ 3058' 29I2'13' 1561' o f1 -RL RAMS NOW TRAIL (45' PUBL/C� 260. 03'_ �39.83' ' ,r158 SF / 1 60' /NCRESS CRESS j E - - - - — - - - - -- - -- 54773 51 �E 54773 51 'E - - - — - - -- - -- - -- - CSC 1y�q 2p 0 `W AND UTiVTY ESl7T s 60 00 24 i 1- 23'0125" 1222' $5420'O6� \0 2.76' I \ C39 6000 _-R. 1 255850 1384' 1#t • y` UKT 7424, f C 89B 84,66' 18 613�29W S337T.15, 58' o� / ` __.1.9t.1 I Cao_ 6000 _30.32' 285118 1549. ® DKT 7224, PG 1391- W� CJ is 4 67 _. >t41i.Ofl . 46 46�Og _ . _. 46�QQ' 19 09'__ 43 Z0' - 40 6 E y1 I C4I 60 00' ._ _3J.36' 315I 08 I711 30 5.074 sF `.>?` �9 - - - 6 c3 27 18 �. - ol 42� 64 0 10.00- �0' PUE_ r - -. _ __r C35 O ®' I v r - r J _ J ! y % 6,072 SF I C43 25 00 41 70' 95 3J 45 17 55 . E 100.06' 5.16 v. I I Z% ! 1 Z6� I I Z¢ I I 23 I 1 ZZ 1 1 21 ! �� �2: �'' aW 1135,�2'-' L=126.81' (R), L=126.76' (M) \ , C44 2500. 3684' __ 842615, 2268' 40' INGRESS if S D S54 20'O6" I ZS +`I I +y. I T _S 2`5 1 +� r ! ! :Y 1 + 1 ZO 1 ,t o ?s, .. _p1 20'O6 oy _ d� �y> > R=�64.00' C45 2500' 4110' 953345' 1755, "fi�IIG�'�ki TF v fsMT w 29 I! y m 1 b m b m b ., 1 I 19 os BASIN 2 p=2T31'17" (R), p=27'30'40" (M) C<6 2500' 36.84' 842615' _ 22.68' DKI 10692, PG 9- - C.A. "B" o be o o mils o o o >� o o > o 3 p�� / C.A. "B" C47 _-757.00" _- 17.06' 177'29' ___8.53' 7t _ _ . _. uu N 9,436 SF '� /� .� vi > vi h 3 h h h h ^ !� rn --- �"�"""` - -- o I ! ® � r 1 I I T �; o s� r, 12,317 SF I cab 75700' S4.15' 4 D5'S6' 27.09' BASIN 3 0 11z I h • C70 6000' s4o' Sti9Y3' z70' h " I 113 1 11 I I 112 I 1 112 I I 111 I I 111 I I 110 ! I 110 I 110 ro N �\ �, LT7 10.26' BASIN _ 1 ut 1 I 1000'/ L 1 I 1 I r I I l ,r, L .--'...I I --r�4 C2 o _029 FC 25.00 -__XIST. 15.7715.07' L19 68.06'_ _I5.2960.08' PIMA CO(/N7Y N47-24'56"W (R) 820.76' (R) N47-23.51-W (M) 820.80' (M) 20' PUE GRANTED ?5.00: 13.99' J?U3'28' 718 FND. Y2" REBAR-_, I\ ORO VALLEY "RLS 25405" UNSUBD/li/DED TOWN LIMITS ZONE.- Cf-/ BY THIS PUT -- // / 'FND. CONC. NAIL O/ / I NO TAG •w�� entranco A ` 1ee0 E RNr N4 9d4 3W (57D) 2De-6700 OV12-03-07 T ft^ Az sane I= (Sao) 20-em 62 L21 �73' . �1 NOTE. NO STRUCTURES PLANTINGS; OR 07HER OBSTRUCIIONS SHALL BE PERMITTED BETWEEN 30' MID 72' HIGH ABOVE NEAREST EDGE OF PAVEMENT GRADE, INCLUDING SCREEN WALLS EASEMENTS FOR SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLES, BY THIS PLAT SCALE: 1 "=30' FINAL PLAT FOR QQ Rams Pass \ LOTS 1 THRU 86, AS TO AS TO and Common Areas 'A' (Recreation Area), SURVEYING ONLY ENGINEERING ONLY 'B' (Dralnage), 'C' (Landscaped Buffer Yard), -D' (Trail Access), and 'E' (Levee Slops) 35111 40221 TUCSON, ARIIZONA GREOe HUNT MGA. A Pa?nGWS CF SECAAYS 5 & Q 772S R14E V'( C"M IYMA COUNTY, AR/IOVA SCALE: 1"=40' SHEET 3 OF 3 PRIVATE GRADING PLANS FOR BIG HORN COMMERCIAL CENTER G 1602254 STEAM PUMP VILLAGE PH. 3 MP BK. 64 PG. 95 ZONING: PAD CITY OF TUCSON & PIMA COUNTY STANDARD DETAIL FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS 2003 EDITION BARRICADE RAILING .......................... STD. NO. 105 CONCRETE SIDEWALK ........................ STD. NO. 200 SIDEWALK SUPPER TYPE 2 .............. STD. NO. 205 CURB ACCESS RAMP ........................ STD. NO. 207 CONCRETE CURB TYPE 2 ................. STD. NO. 209 CONCRETE HEADER ........................... STD. NO. 213 SW CDR SEC 5 FO 2"LCP 7, Gk' OPO> 580.0726 E f 65.28' N48'05'17 W RAMS CANYON PHASE III MP BK. 56 'PG. 33 ZONING: PAD. FND. 2" BCSM "RLS �'OGBS'j� GJ O MARKED 26058" PER RAMS CANYON UK. 48, PG. 87 21A 60-INGRESSIEGRES EASEMENT DKT. 7224, PG. 138Z 50' RI 0r?F�> GAO A, 0 ti ti 26j� 7.� F v SOUTH LINE SECTION 5 D=454'S8" ��SHURGARD R=3969C," SELF STORAGE DP BK. 25, PG. 22 o h - FD 3" ACP ZONING: T-P �Q '� �0\ z IN CONC Gj `ACP MKD. 'USDA" S.W. COR. SEC. 8 EARTHWORKS ES AMATE SITE PLAN ENGINEER'S ESTIMATED EARTHWORK QUANTITIES SITE CUT = 1,300 CY FILL = 7,650 CY TOTAL IMPORT= 6,297 CY ASSUMPTIONS, 20% SHRINK ON FILL AREAS EARTHWORK QUANTITIES SHOWN ARE FOR ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE & PERMITTING ONLY. ALL CONTRACTORS SHALL CONDUCT AND BASE THEIR BID ON THEIR OWN EARTHWORK ANALYSIS. J� 4 �O 0b co-,pA,mc,p.- T-1Eo (c%cpsI d N SCALE: 1"=60' 0 60 1 0 O RAMS CANYON MP BK. 48 PG. 87 ZONING: PAD FND. 2" BCSM MARKED 'RLS 26058" PER RAMS CANYON BK. 48, PG. 87 4' 1313'E --qa 4 . 7' ACCEPTED BY: SHEET INDEX.' I .......... COVER SHEET 2...... -NOTES & DEMOLITION PLAN 3.......... GRADING PLAN 4.......... SECTIONS & DETAILS 5.......... SWPPP TOWN OF ORO VALLEY DATE OWNER/DEVELOPER. BIG HORN COMMERCE CENTER, LLC 6650 N. ORACLE ROAD, SUITE 100 TUCSON. AZ 85704 ATTN.- MR. ROBERT SOLFISBURG EMAIL: bob®jbsadzona.com TEL (520) 742-7887 FAX (520) 742-3343 SURVEY INFORMATION BY AMEC INFRASTRUCTURE, INC. 4600 E WASHINGTON ST 1600 PHOENIX, AZ 85034 ATTN: BRYAN CAMPBELL EMAIL BRYAN.CAMPBELLOAMECSW.CO,M (502) 733-6023 (PROJECT 103-2003-078 BY DANNY GREEN) AAD RI ORO VALLEY C41AUNA STA7r PARK Um ORO VAUEY 1. ORO TTE�SS E � 8JECTAo E PAMs CANYON ( PAD ORO YAUfY ORD�IGLLEY 6 5 STEAD PUMP 7 v�i RANCH H NEYWELL g Po COIkRY �' N v UNSUBBOMDEO OW VAU Y SCALE E1 3'=1 MILE r LOCATION MAP > A PORTION OF THE S.W. 114 OF SECTION 5 TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 14 EAST = GILA & SALT RAVER MERIDIAN, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PIMA COUNTY, AZ d SCALE: 3'=1 MILE � 3W� y O Z � Q 20 Q O�4 LEGEND L� O oti� 6B FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT AS NO u J v ti \� 0 FND. 1/2" IRON ROD, RLS 29873 21.53-�, PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION (AS NOTED) 3 ^ O EG EXISTING GROUND 0 w 2 TOE TOE OF BERM, SLOPE ETC. W 3 TOP TOP OF BERM, SLOPE ETC, r Q� o FL FLOWLINE OF SWALE a O zi D.F. DRAINAGE FLOW ARROWS 0. ^ 6 DRAINAGE DISCHARGE POINT a k g Q SLOPE INDICATOR a 2634 EXISTING TOPO CONTOUR — ' - d -- 2634 PROPOSED TOPO CONTOUR - - - - - - - - PROPOSED CONCRETE TOEDOWN I PROPERTY BOUNDARY m �- - - EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY N ¢ GRADING LIMITS W -' W z j — — — --- EASEMENT AS NOTED STREET CENTERLINE U o EX_WSEL EXISTING WATER SURFACE ELEVATION L L a a EXISTING UNDER GROUND ELECTRIC W W w -- EXISTING WATER LINE AND VALVE EXISDNG SEWER LINE AND MANHOLE � O O� U Z OHE - --- EXISTING OVER HEAD ELECTRIC & POWER POLE r ' U Z —x x-- EXISTING FENCE o -- o----0 0 o- NEW BARRICADE RAILING 2 _ FYISTING ELECTRIC PEDESTAL/TRANSFORMER _ _ w U D] ¢ it EXISTING TELEPHONE/CABLE TV mi- EVST/NG EDGE OF PAVEMENT 4 ; a NEW GROUTED ROCK RIPRAP c �oW NEW HANOPLACED ROCK -zy Q z RIPRAP W �'E, . LQ NEW CONCRETE ., W 3p¢aoX EXISTING CONCRETE ,T ^ � z ~ 180' LVT� SIGHT VISfB217Y TR144GLE L - _ (SEE SHEET 2) 's NEW 112" GRAVEL OR 1n - .. - - PAVEMENT MILLINGS, 1 "THICK KENNLTI 0. PD7R1' m SLP D : C,B9Iil1 101T b � NA Expim; 9/30/17 .............._ W!DDESIGN Or. LH.CA.D.P. G 1602254 ax KO.P08/15/2017 ABNUMBS&1=7 REFERENCE.• 01RlG Na OV12-05-23 ��9�� 1 ,, 5 GENERAL PAINING AND GRADING NOTES 1. ALL MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP ARE TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH PIMA COUNTY/C11Y OF TUCSON STANDARD DETAILS AND SPECIFI 77ONS FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS (PC/COT SSPI), EDITION OF 2003, EXCEPT AS MODIFIED H EBY. 2. ALL CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING METHODS SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH PC/COT SSPI, ED17ION OF 2003, EXCEPT AS MODIFIED HEREBY. 3. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE TO GRADING STANDARDS CHAPTER 27.9 OF THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED. 4. EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL FOR STRUCTURES SHALL CONFORM TO PC/COT SSPI, SECTION 203-5, 5. EARTHWORK, EXCEPT AS MODIFIED BY THE SOILS REPORT OF RECORD, SHALL CONFORM TO PC/GOT SSPI, SECTION 203. 6. AGGREG47E BASE COURSE SHALL CONFORM TO PC/COT SSPI, SECTION 303. 7 ASPHALTIC CONCRETE SHALL CONFORM TO PC/COT SSPI, SECTION 406 ASPHALTIC CONCRETE MIXTURE No. 2 SPECIFICATIONS 8. ALL CONCRETE SHALL CONFORM TO PC/COT SSPI, SECTION 1006, CLASS S, 3 000-PSI COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH AT 28 DAYS, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 9. A STAMPED SET OF APPROVED PLANS SHALL BE KEPT IN AN EASILY ACCESSIBLE LOCATION ON THE JOB S17E AT ALL TIMES OR DURING CONSTRUCTION. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION REGULATIONS. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL BLUE STAKE (1-800-782-5348) TO VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL UI7U7IES PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL PERMITS REQUIRED BY GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES. A ROW CONSTRUCTION PERMIT SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION RELATED ACTIVITIES W17HIN RAMS FIELD PASS ROW. 13. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL STREET SIGNS N ACCORDANCE WITH THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY SUBDIVISION STREET STANDARDS - SIGNAGE POLICY. 14. PAVING CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST BOTH EXISTING AND NEW WATER VALVES, BOX COVERS, WATER METER BOXES, SANITARY SEWER MANHOLES AND CLEANOUT RINGS AND COVERS, TELEPHONE AND ELECTRIC MANHOLE RING AND COVERS TO THE NEW FINISHED GRADE. 15. UPON COMMENCEMENT OF WORK, TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE POSTED AND MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE WORK IS COMPLETED. ALL WARNING SIGNS, BARRICADES, ETC., SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE M4NUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES ADOPTED BY THE STATE OF ARIZONA PURSUANT TO A.R.S. 28-650. 16. IF UNANTICIPATED CONDITIONS ARE ENCOUNTERED DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUC7ION AND ARE BEYOND THE SCOPE OF THE DESIGN, THE ENGINEER SHALL SUBMIT THE NECESSARY REVISED OR SUPPLEMENTAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PRIOR TO SUCH REWSONS/CHANGES BEING MADE IN THE FIELD. 17 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CARE AND MAINTENANCE OF EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS AND VEGETATION IN THE WORK AREA, PAVEMENT, CURBS AND ANY OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION ARE TO BE REPLACED BY THE CONTRACTOR. ANY UNDERGROUND PIPES, IRRIGATION LINES IRRIGATION CONTROLS, DRAINS, STRUCTURES, OR OBSTRUCTIONS NOT SHOWN ON THESE PLANS SHALL BE MOVED, ALTERED, OR REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR WHEN ENCOUNTERED, AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER, AND IS A DERN17E PART OF THIS PROJECT. I& ACCEPTANCE OF THESE PLANS DOES NOT CONSTITUTE OR IMPLY ACCEPTANCE OF ANY OF THE FOLL047NG. o) WALL(S), RETAINING OR OTHER TYPE(S). 6) ANY REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURE(S). c) ANY EMBANKMENTS) WHOSE PRIMARY PURPOSE IS TO FUNCTION AS A RETENNON/DETENTION STRUCTURE THE ITEMS LISTED ABOVE ARE APPROVED FOR LOCATION ONLY. SEPARATE PLAN CHECKS AND PERMITS ARE REQUIRED, ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE CODES OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY. 19. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GIVE FORTY-EIGHT (48) HOURS N077CE WHEN THEY SHALL REQUIRE THE SERVICES OF THE ENGINEER OR ANY OTHER PERSON PROPERLY AUTHORIZED FOR SUCH PURPOSE FOR LAYING OUT ANY PORTION OF THE WORK THEY SHALL ALSO DIG ALL STAKE HOLES NECESSARY TO GIVE LINE AND LEVELS AND SHALL PROVIDE ASSISTANCE CALLED FOR BY THE ENGINEER OR THEIR ASSISTANTS UPON ANY PART OF THE WORK WHENEVER SO REQUESTED, AND SHALL PRESERVE ALL STAKES SET FOR THE LINES LEVELS OR MEASUREMENTS OF THE WORK IN THEIR PROPER PLACES UNTIL AUTHORIZED TO REMOVE THEM BY THE ENGINEERS. ANY EXPENSE INCURRED IN REPLACING ANY STAKES WHICH THE CONTRACTOR OR THEIR SUBORDINATES MAY HAVE FAILED TO PRESERVE SHALL BE CHARGED TO THE CONTRACTOR. 20. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO FURNISH, HAUL AND APPLY ALL WATER REQUIRED FOR COMPACTION AND FOR THE CONTROL OF DUST FROM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY THE COST 774EREOF IS TO BE INCLUDED IN THE GRADING CONSTRUCTION PRICE. 21. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO FULLY COMPLY WITH ADEQ STORMWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REPORT AND POLLUTION PLANS PREPARED BY THE ENGINEER. THE COST THEREOF TO BE INCLUDED IN THE GRADING CONSTRUCTION PRICE. 22. BUILDING 517ES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO WITHIN 0.10 FOOT OF FINISH BUILDING PAD ELEVATIONS AS STAKED BY THE ENGINEER. STREETS AND PARKING AREAS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO WITHIN 0.10 FEET OF FINISH SUBGRADE AS STAKED BY THE ENGINEER. 23 A REPORT OF SOILS INVESTIGATIONS, INCLUDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR GRADING PROCEDURES HAS BEEN PREPARED BY PATTISON-EVANOFF ENGINEERING, LLC DATED SEPTEMBER, 2016 JOB NO. 16-104 FOR THIS PROJECT. EARTHWORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE RECOMMENDARONS CONTAINED IN %D REPORT AND ANY AMENDMENTS MADE THERETO, INCLUDING LETTER DATED SEPT 2, 2016 24. THE SOILS ENGINEER SHALL OBSERVE INSPECT AND TEST ALL CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: CLEARING, GRUBBING, SUBGR40E PREPARATION, STRUCTURAL, TRENCH EXCAVATION AND 34CKF7LL, MATERIAL TESTING, TOGETHER WITH PLACEMENT OF FILL. SAID ENGINEER SHALL CERTIFY IN WRITING, THAT ALL SOILS OPERATIONS AND MATERIALS USED FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT WERE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS AS SET FORTH IN THE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION OF RECORD AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE ACCEPTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. CERTIFICATION, IN WRITING, ARE TO BE RECEIVED BY THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PRIOR TO THE REQUEST FOR FINAL INSPECTION AND RELEASE OF ASSURANCES. 25. PERRY ENGINEERING ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY AND NEITHER GUARANTEES NOR WARRANTS THE RESULTS OF ANY SUBSURFACE EXPLORATIONS, THE CONCLUSIONS REACHED, RECOMMENDATIONS WE, OR ANY TEST RESULTS PRESENTED. 26. GRADING BOUNDARIES SHALL BE CLEARLY MARKED, AND ALL WORK WILL BE CONFINED TO APPROVED PROJECT LIMITS AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. 27. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR 714E SURVEYOR PROVIDING THE CONSTRUC7ON LAY UT TO VERIFY THE BENCHMARK AND COMPARE THE SITE CONDITIONS WITH THE PLANS AND SHALL N077FY THE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OBSERVED. SHOULD ANY BENCHMARK, GR40E OR DESIGN INDICATED ON THE PLANS BE SUSPECT, THE ENGINEER SHALL BE N077FIED OF SAID BENCHMARK, GRADE OR DESIGN PROBLEM AT LEAST TWENTY-FOUR HOURS BEFORE CONSTRUCTION IS SCHEDULED TO BEGIN ON THE AFFECTED AREA. 28. IT SHALL BE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER (S), THEIR SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS (AND/OR THEIR CONTRACTOR, THEIR SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS AS APPLICABLE) TO PURSUE ANY N£COTATIONS, OBTAIN ANY AGREEMENTS AND/OR PERMITS, ETC, FROM ALL NECESSARY OWNERS, PRIVATE AND/OR GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES IN CHARGE OF PROPERTIES AND/OR RIGMS-OF-WAY ADJACENT TO (OR NEIGHBORING) THIS PROJECT, THAT MAY BE REQUIRED TO DO ANY WORK (CONSTRUCTION, ACCESS, MODIFICATIONS GRADING, DRAINAGE, STRUCTURES, ROADS ETC.) ENCROACHING OR AFFECTING - DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY - ON THESE ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND RIGHTS -OF -WAY IN ANY CONCEIVABLE MANNER, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER OR NOT THIS WORK IS SHOWN OR DESCRIBED DN THESE PLANS 29. THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER OF RECORD SHAD. SUBMIT AS -BUILT RECORD DRAWINGS AND CERTIFY IN WRI77NG THAT ALL IMPROVEMENTS, WHETHER PRIVATE OR PUBLIC, HAVE BEEN CONSTRUCTED. PLACED, INSTALLED, ETC. IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE ACCEPTED PLANS FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT. CERTIFICATIONS IN WRITING AND THE AS -BUILT RECORD DRAWINGS ARE TO BE RECEIVED BY THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY A MINIMUM OF TWO (2) WEEKS PRIOR TO THE REQUEST FOR CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY AND/OR FINAL INSPECTION BY 714E DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND THE RELEASE OF ASSURANCES EXCEPT FOR MODEL HOMES INTENDED TO BE USED FOR SALES PURPOSES. IF THE PROJECT IS PHASED THE ABOVE PERTAINS TO EACH PHASE. 30. THE TOWN WILL, UPON RECEIPT OF ALL NECESSARY CERTIFICATIONS AS OUTLINED ON THE IMPROVEMENT PLANS AND FINAL PLAT, PERFORM A RELD RENEW OF THE DEVELOPMENT. RELD CONDITIONS, DESIGN OVERSIGHTS; ETC, MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL WORK AND/OR IMPROVEMENTS AS A RESULT OF SAID REVIEW 31. BASIS OF BEARING THE BEARING OF S 47 29' 52' E ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF RAMS FIELD PASS ROAD, AS SHOWN IN ALTA SURVEY BY DAVID L. PUTT, RLS 13019, ET4TRL£D ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY, PORTIONS OF SECTIONS 5 & 8 , T 12 S, R 14 E, G&SRM, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZON4" DATED JULY 23, 2002. BOUN&4RY SURVEY PREPARED BY.- AMEC INFRASTRUCTURE, INC. 32. THE BASIS OF ELEVATION IS A X ALUMINUM DISK ON EAST BARRIER WALL APPROXIMATELY 2.9-FEET ABOVE RL14DWAY AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE ORACLE ROAD BRIDGE OVER THE CANYON DEL ORO WASH. PIMA COUNTY BENCHMARK SURVEY PREPAREED BY AMEC INFRASTRUCTURE,IC 33. OWNER/DEVELOPER. BIG HORN COMMERCE CENTER, LLC 6650 N. ORACLE ROAD, SUITE 100 TUCSON, AZ 85704 ROBERT SOLFSBURG (520) 742-7867 FAX (520) 742-JJ43 34. ALL EASEMENTS MUST BE ACQUIRED BY OWNER/BUILDER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. GENERAL NOTES 1. UTILITY LOCATIONS AS INDICATED HEREIN WERE COMPILED BASED UPON THE SURVEY PROVIDED BY AMEC INFRASTRUCTURE, INC., PROJECT NUMBER 03-2003-078,. UTILITY LOCATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED TO BE EXACT OR COMPLETE THE ENGINEER DOES NOT GUARANTEE THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF UTILITIES SHOWN HEREIN. PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE HORIZONTAL LOCATIONS AND VERTICAL ELEVATIONS OF ALL POTENTIALLY AFFECTED UTILITIES WITH THE APPROPRIATE ORGANIZATIONS, POT -HOLING IF NECESSARY CONTACT BLUE STAKE- AT 1-800-782-5348 TWO (2) FULL WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. SATURDAYS, SUNDAYS AND HOLIDAYS ARE NOT CONSIDERED WORKING DAYS. 2. THESE GRADING PLANS ARE 84SED UPON SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY AMEC INFRASTRUCTURE, INC., PROJECT NO. 03-2003-078. PERRY ENGINEERING, LLC ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY AND NEITHER GUARANTEES NOR WARRANTS THE COMPLETENESS, ACCURACY OR RESULTS OF THIS SURVEY. J. AN IN -LIEU FEE SHALL BE PROVDED FOR A CONCRETE SIDEWALK ALONG ORACLE ROAD, SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY THE TOWN ENGINEER AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT AND CONSTRUCTION. HIGHWAY - TUCSON-FLORENCE ORACLE ROAD (PuBLIC) _ --- UTE -- _ --- - - - -- _- (STATE RO77) D-10-T-342 ADOT DRAWING NO. --? NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT ALL EXISTING UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND ABOVE GROUND) IN PLACE. EXISTING HIGH VOLTAGE ELECTRICAL LINES AND TELEPHONE, CABLE TV AND OR FIBER OPTIC IN THE VICINITY OF THIS PROJECT. ALL REMOVED ITEMS AND MATERIAL SHALL BE LEGALLY DISPOSED OF OFFSITE UNLESS OTHERWSE NOTED. vI jt5jj `tt15 i ro ti I+ I i III / 1 ifl III I IN i DEMOLITION PLAN DEMOLITION KEY NOTES: f0 SALVAGE AND CLEAN ONSITE ROCK WITHIN EXIST. BERM, FOR REUSE ON WEST SLOPE AND WITH IN BASINS. DISCARD ANY FILTER FABRIC (MIN. ALLOWABLE DIA=4", 00=6') Q REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXIS77NG FENCE O3 REMOVE EXISTING 3 X3' CONCRETE SLAB ® SAW CUT & REMOVE EXISTING DEPRESSED CURB AND POST BARRICADE TO ACCOMMODATE NEW SIDEWALK SCUPPERS 05 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF ANY TRASH, DISCARDED ITEMS, BRUSH PILES, WOOD, ETC. FROM WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS © SAW CUT & REMOVE EXISTING VERTICAL CURB TO THE NEAREST JOINT TO ACCOMMODATE NEW CURB ACCESS RAMP N 0 50 1 0 SCALE: 1'=50' CJ.=1' r�. 11 a o ci Q LWi1�a u U L�C9 �i O ozij W \0 3^� U 1"Lw0 w ��2 m � O 3 4 0 2- 2 a^LW 06 O U W 0 U o CA W o F- J �& o CO 41 41 w z Q po J U a Z= a� ~W U' = o 05 � bpi-: 9/30/17 DE9fp BY. L.H.CACDY � K.D.P. G 1602254 Bm4vrt: *¢snra lT" 9 bw 2.. ml DATE 08/15/2017 amvffi89�tDAMa�RTs i mm PE JOB WNWE 18017 REFERENCE: n o 0; 16 OV12-05-23 a ®99 TP ®meDE,t�mm®7tI.B® }y 2 of 5 TUCSON—FLORENCE ""WAY ORACLE ROAD ( (STATE ROUTE 77) ADO, RIW ECT 1BP-031-1-813 DWG.i 0-IOT-342 . .31 AN W p r. - N w Ni N �,I IN `" -• 0100=130.0cfs DA=22.3 AC wo OFF3'�_° 21 VCP SEWER I (C-63-041) ♦ - _ `- ,• — NV.=?615.41 E I< 8" PVC SEWER (G-21C2-128) 29.0 EXISTING SHEET FLOW FROM SHE. 0100=13.8cfs >" % B DA = 2.7 AC'"' 4 N o- I/E/U EMENT PER DKT. 11564.11 PG. 389 L-► _ 7- E. ;S', SE'dER LLS. RI,M=262819 ' E. INv-2618.19 RAMS PASS, LOTS 1-86 W. !NV=2618.2.9 M&P, SK. 59, PG, 70 71,ek'.. p.d4F K�*L ?1 IZF,fF X.(yaact 3 us 'Lj, F�±.i,gMtvar, ew I'm a."S S�':,sxa<•, rit,, t_ CAeGAiL'A I L Af CAE SFNJw6 d cal} �,, . 114jl' 1T0' 1 � StR4PVCQ1,S.j 'nit r',Us_,MYG x_ DOxert,.Wn+" 0 bKr 1154I, CG, '�3V A+1tk5tx tr3c„t til9A.k. �1«A vxS 04,09E 1! Flra->l,n3 +.vrecnbtt. nitcr '17it9 Cr11hbN,ka PSr.�.? �+nUr2 T,yq 718 63,4sp MN,. {!i'PnYE4'E�Q WN4AE 'i �1L3m5 .(aaA{neA%yn,mor�: &,AA c'p4% wi03va is tiih.Cl 5 FsuvrJrnr� !«>E, 4-- -"ER Yloo4-a+J'3 (1d12t'rQ .ri3N.. °F ".Agg C,•_ — /j CevhlkNA,Y s 7 Aruxna�.�saL:S� �,y�>dlra.stJF,� n,Yx'..'9G' 2%�azlc,RS+�% I3,rA", -nit uP J N SCALE: 1'=30' 1—T CCLCD ,I Ll Zcoao.>o 2610.96r 0100=1 14.9cfs CA = 18.5 AC M OFF 1 �J�P$GKi'C�A' wj't rnn?f lutr 4.4 E11ST 8 �E83R4�) rau, ¢� PLAN 'No.. 1 1 A RAMS FIELD PASS RD PER DKT. 7224, PG. 1387 i KEYNOTES (D EXISTING 61 X44' CMP ARCH CULVERT INLET ELEV=26.93 OO EXISTING ELECTRICAL, GABLE TV & TELEPHONE CABINETS. MAINTAIN 2' FT MIN. CLEAR BETWEEN CABINET AND SIDEWALK. 3� END 5' SIDEWALK AT CURB RETURN. ®GROUTED ROCK RIPRAP EMBEDDED j D50 INTO 6' THICK, 3000 PSI, CONCRETE WITH F8ERUESH 05 NEW 5' SIDEWALK (t381 LF TOTAL) PER PC/COT STD. DR. 200 © CURB ACCESS RAMP PER PC/COT STD. 1207 07 END 5' WIDE SIDEWALK AT EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY LINE 08 SEE DETAIL C' SHEET 4 FOR SCUPPER DETAILS (B)NEW 48 LF. OF 12.0 RCP INLET EL=27.3, OUTLET EL=27.0 ® EXIST 62'X40' CMP ARCH CULVERT OUTLET EL=29.78 1O HAND PLACED ROCK RIP -RAP OVER MIW 180N FILTER FABRIC, D50=6' 12' THICK ® NEW 1' THICK GRAVEL OR PAVEMENT MILLINGS (}' ROCK) OVER COMPACTED SUBGRADE ® 20' X 20' DRAINAGE ACCESS/MAINTENANCE EASEMENT BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT ® NEW BARRICADE RAILING PER PC/COT STD. OTL. 1 105 i® EXISTING (4) - 24.0 CORRUGATED HOPE CULVERTS TO REMAIN IN PLACE ®MAINTAIN 4' STRAIGHT (SIDEWALK) BEYOND EXISTING UALITY CABINETS THEN BEGIN SIDEWALK ANGLE TYP. TWO ANGLE LOCATIONS Q SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLES, FOR DIMENSIONS SEE SHEET C2 ® EXIS77NG CONCRETE SIDEWALK TO REMAIN IN PLACE ®12' WOE, 1' HIGH, TEMPORARY EARTHEN BERM WITH 4.1 SIDE SLOPES TO WRAP AROUND RIPRAP SPLASH PAD FOR IMPROVED AND DIRECT CONVEYANCE. TOP=34.0 ® 2' DEEP CONCRETE TOEDOWN FOR SCOUR PR07EC77ON AT BASE OF SLOPE, a5' WIDE WITH 1.01.4 WWF CENTERED IN TOEDOWN. ®CONTRACTOR TO TRENCH AS NECESSARY TO CREATE POSITIVE OUT FLOW. y e N m L N ' A RIM=2634. 17 ¢ I IW..=2622.39 E. a �y II INV.=2622-28 W. 1 m INGRESS EGRESS I EASEMENT DKT 7224, v o m I PG. 1387 mo Tf%f-`+F.b,2Y)a•lf I Cz-£9 AWL ./yOV, li, 7'r 711Mk t✓.a1NR� ZrMv*`az�'.,fz 32.6 "FLO ITHRU 50' R/W E �JL3�1? 91A. CIA2tRl 40 SCU ERS 0100 �_16.Ids D DA 2.1 AC 30' OFF Al ti1 / . PVMT � I 8" PVC SEWER (C-96-087) � 1 r 0' nrWv Lea1FQ i dsra a� i tArAs ate+G ti# 2-0 1 1i -EMI EWER M.HH c +�� a ka iP 6 nA S C424WA(6 f,�W- .yl } RIMk 63362 4r0c+uk;v ty,1r- Sp6 INV.N12623.52 E k'ass✓»r., 4 INV.-y623.42 W_ i I f 1 1 I A k A 1 y i N I 11 1 m II �I I I o II i � 1 I I D. i Eryirw: 9130177 � DESIGN BY: LH.C/K.D.P. G 1602254 $ � 01 K.D.P. DAM 08/15/2017 PE JOB 1Alllfflt: 16017 REFERENCE: OV12-05-23163 „ 5 GROUTED ROCK RIPRAP R EMBEDDED 112 050 INTO 6- THICK -v^ 21 i ti 3,000 PSI CONCRETE WITH FIBERMESH EXISTING SIDEWALK [I 2' TO REMAIN - 2F_. � o EXTEND 0.5' VERTICALLY INTO BASIN 807TOM x o � A� SOUTHWEST DETENTION AREA 1 U SCALE: 1"=5' HAND PLACED ROCK 7 R 21't RIP -RAP OVER FILTER A ce Liu FABRIC, 050=67, 12' THICK io � 2 LXIS77NG SIDEWALK 2' 18' W ? ~ TO REMAIN-\ �ri o Z EXTEND 0.5' VER7ICALLY iz O o H INTO BASIN BOTTOM U1 s SOUTHWEST DETENTION AREA 2 u SCALE: 1'=5-3 a! 3 o d 2S2 2' TYP - PROP. SIDEWALK = i? h p OVERBUILD SCUPPERS cV :. 5,/ �A_ SAW -CUT REMOVE k REPLACE MIN. ¢ 9 OF 1 FT. BY 22 LF. INTO EXIST. ,o`4y 4k 11s PAVEMENT TO PROVIDE UNIFORM CONSTRUC710N ONT. y A HAND PLACED ROCK RIP -RAP OVER FILTER FABRIC, 050=6" 12' THICK, -pO N BARRICADE RAIUNG _ J EXIST. CANC. W Z }VERTICAL CURB ' a �Ll i i sti�Sa_� o �*' i• ° NEW 5' CONC. } W q SIDEWALK L w �1 a. U z "- (F) W o Z W t -NEW SIDEWALK SCUPPERS -NEW SIDEWALK SCUPPERS �PER PC/COT STD. DR. 205 (SIDEWALK SUPPER TYPE 2) NTS 4; i C7 W �uOWNy w7 iiNYa 38FZUQ,..� z o V 6 N Erpk.: 9/30/17 DE3M !Y: LH.C/K.DP. G1602254 �,� K.D.P. DAIS 08/15/2M7 � pE am Kuee�16rn� REFERENCE Mum Nm OV12-O5-23ppJp9mPD@s@99D®m a 5 ROAD (PUBLIC)_ ORACLE -_ (STATE RW ROJECT ApOi R/ OBP-O D-11T'342 DWG.ti 1 263: -- - G/ 2f3i-- I , ,_ .. STIX7AC£_ - WASTE NEIiNC/ �.. � STACJNG STORAGE - - _. MAItGL .�. OO ♦������ —77 ----------------- wow ------1---.�r. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN N SCALE.. C1.=1' KEY NOTES O1 SEDIMENT WATTLES. SEE DR. 2, THIS SHEET AND GRADING LIMITS O STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. SEE DTL. 1, THIS SHEET O MATERIAL DELIVERY AND STORAGE, AND STAGING AREA. ® HAZARDOUS, SOLID, AND LIQUID WASTE AREAS. OS VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT FUELING AREA. © NEW 1' THICK GRAVEL OR PAVEMENT MILLINGS (1/2- ROCK) OVER COMPACTED SUBGRADE GEOTEXTXE UNDERLINER 2'-3' CLEAN STONE 12' MINIMUM STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE D NTS STAKE ON 3' TO 4' 1TER M/N/MUM LEGEND STORAGE STAGING WASTE STORAGE NEl c/ MAWT. 9' L -T STAKE COMPACT 18'-24' EXCAVATED SOIL TO' r i (Typ) ON UPSLOPE SIDE ^I nl n2 m N' J z� a a (L W� U U O� Uz z� o� y p s ro Q r394�' f5�`y'Jt\r"i <6.1� W�4 TYPICAL WA TILE SPACING BASED jSyy' Q a ,�'Oi ON SLOPE GRADIENT W J 3 0- a m X �1 STRAW WATTLE INSTALLATION z o N q a NTS i KENND. � PER - z E*-: 9/30/17 c DE94N 8C LH.C/K.D.P. c wD G l 602254 r. K.D.P. mxmwwkl— ml lD'.muC2toffi DATE 08/15/2017 PE 16017 REFERENCE. 0 au + � DRAvec HD. OV12-05-23 �� � —v— � 5 w 5 ~V) GENERAL NOTES PAD i CATALINA 1. GROSS AREA OF DEVELOPMENT IS 3.259 ACRES Rl ORO VALLEY ;STATE PARK z NET BUILDING AREA = 27, 905.42 SF, FINAL SITE PLAN ORO VALLEY c __________ ORO 0 VALLEY 2. ZONING C-1 P THIS 3. BUILDING GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE = 29,025 SF. GPNp� PROJECT S�P� BIG HORN ��F, RAMS CANYON COMMERCE CENTER'� PAD 4. PARKING REQUIREMENTS, REFER TO SHEET 6 OF 7 FOR CALCULATIONS 5 �� RESTAURANT = 6, / 000 SF 100 = 60 pqp �y s0� ORO VALLEY s z GENERAL RETAIL = 22,985 SF/250 = 91.94 6 5 OV1 700950 ORO VALLEY - �o TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED = 152 SPACES STEAM PUMP ov /0 s TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED = 152 SPACES RANCH H NErwELL ON SITE STANDARD PARKING SPACES MEASURE 9' X 20' RAMS A N Y O N PHASE III 0 oPr MIN. COMPACT PARKING SPACES MEASURE 8' X 16 : u o S 1 - 21 1 1 ��P Pr A oar.rN N HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACE MEASURE 13' X 20' (8'+5=13') FOR ONE STEAM PUMP VILLAGE P N a �% � � L � T 8 N �� \ UNSUBDIVIDED SPACE 21 X 20 (8 +5 +8 =21) FOR TWO ADJACENT PARKING SPACES. LOTS 1-7 �\ MP BK. 6 P G ` 33 ��Py PAD PARKING SPACES WILL NOT ENCROACH UPON A REQUIRED LANDSCAPE % �; S80°07'26 "E ZONING : P A �� ORO VALLEY SCALE: BUFFERYARD. PARKING SPACE ENCROACHING UPON A SIDEWALK WILL HAVE A P I� ° 4 P 9 5 N48 05 17 W �\ 9 �� 3 MALE z 65.28 FND. 2" BCSM MINIMUM 4' CLEARANCE BETWEEN THE OVERHANG AND THE END OF THE ZONING- PAD 42.48 `�� 0 60 SIDEWALK FOR PEDESTRIANS. i �o \�\` MARKED RLS 26058 /,off SJ� 10 L OCA T/ON MAP PER RAMS CANYON 5. PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS C-1 COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. �P��� �i� \ BK. 48, PG. 87 ��� A PORTION OF THE S.W. 1/4 OF SECTION 5 FLOOR AREA RATIO = .2045 J SCALE: 1 "=60' TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 14 EAST - OPEN SPACE = 33.30% 4�A GILA & SALT RIVER MERIDIAN TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 3 z - TOTAL GROSS FLOOR AREA < .25 NET LOT AREA � � - ,- � ' PIMA COUNTY, AZ LE BUILDING VOLUME RATIO SCALE. 3"=1 MILE OPEN SPACE = 47,226 SF. = 33.30% NET LOT AREA �(/ PQO�� ���� �V \ \ 2 J AGGREGATE AREA OF THE BUILDINGS = 20.45% NET LOT AREA �� O ; �'� �� - THE GROSS FLOOR AREA OF ANY ONE STRUCTURE DOES NOT EXCEED 15,000 Q�" '� Q LEGEND SF. R- J Qj p� 1`ti QG �� / 60 INGRESS/EGRES w BUILDING HEIGHT = 25 FT. 0 �. p ,h co°� _ ,y �' ���� EASEMENT DKT. O �1 EG EXISTING GROUND TOTAL OPEN SPACE PROVIDED = 47,226 SF. ,��' Q� \ o ��� TOE TOE OF BERM, SLOPE ETC. `c Q• �, hD^� o cis. �z 7224 PG. 1387. w 6. BASIS OF BEARINGS: " ���� ,`� s <C/ \�M S CANYON THE BEARING OF S 47°29' 52" E ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF RAMS FIELD PASS 0 Q' �� �� o is TO.P. TOP OF PIPE '� Q �� ���,�..� o- �> �� O SOTS 3�55 �C 59�89 FL SLOPE ca_ROAD, AS SHOWN IN ALTA SURVEY BY DAVID GJ GJ �P �� �, Q- �P Ph 4� PO �7 L E ETC. FLOWLINE OF SWALE L. PUTT, RLS 13019, ENTITLED ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY, PORTIONS OF J� ���0 SECTIONS 5 & 8, T125, R14E, 6&5RM, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA , DATED p� p� �' BLDG. 4 ��� ZONING: PAD ACP ALUM. CAP IN CONC. JULY 25, 2002. PO P % 1 FLOOR `�� �� O LCP LEAD CAPPED PIPE cl- 7. BASIS OF ELEVATION: \ \ FND. 2" BCSM z A 3' ALUMINUM DISK ON EAST BARRIER WALL APPROXIMATELY 2.9' ABOVE \ 50 R/W PER \MARKED RLS 26058 1/E/U INGRESS/EGRESS & UTILITIES ROADWAY AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE ORACLE ROAD BRIDGE OVER BK. 48, PG. 87 \ �\ PER RAMS CANYON FPE FINISHED PAD ELEVATION \ BK. 48 PG. 87 THE CANYON DEL ORO WASH, PIMA COUNTY BENCHMARK (NAVD 88) ELEVATION PIG HORN COMMERCE CENTER FPE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION = 2652.09 FEET. ` 0 �, O NNSNBDI SIDED / N4 13 13 E 8. NOTE: THE BOUNDARY AS SHOWN WAS RE-ESTABLISHED USING THE ALTA F` ;' ZONING: C - 1.. �.: / 40.57' NG NATURAL GROUND INV INVERT SURVEY COMPLETED BY DAVID PUTT, RLS 13019, DATED JULY 23, 2002, AND �� s� / �.. �' / i CONDITION OF TITLE AMENDMENT 1140003022- T BY FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE A. C AGGREGATED CONCRETE z AGENCY, WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF JANUARY 27, 2004. ��- O 46 z �� �...0" BLDG. 3 / 9. DEVELOPER WILL COVENANT TO HOLD TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ITS SUCCESSORS o �' 1 FLOOR / BOT BOTTOM AND ASSIGNS, HARMLESS IN THE EVENT OF FLOODING. s N41'5042"W z 4 5 21.53 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION (AS NOTED) �� ... w 10. DRAINING WILL NOT BE ALTERED, DISTURBED OR CONSTRUCTED WITHOUT THE 6.33 D.F. DRAINAGE FLOW ARROWS DRAINAGE APPROVAL OF THE ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL. SW CDR SEC 5 a \ �. ' BLDG. 2 11. PROPERTY'S ASSOCIATION WILL BE FORMED TO ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY FOR FD 2" LCP _ ,'� `` 1 FLOOR �/ 444 �J N FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT AS NOTED / �. � MAINTENANCE, CONTROL, SAFETY AND LIABILITY OF PRIVATE DRAINAGE WAYS, <) O FND. 1/2" IRON ROD, RLS 29873 � . � ... � / , ,, � DRAINAGE EASEMENTS AND COMMON AREAS. S89°53'21 "E 890.38' ,\ , g �43 DISCHARGE POINT SOUTH LINE SECTION 5 �� �'� �� 12. FINAL SITE PLANS AND IMPROVEMENTS MUST BE APPROVED FOR COMMERCIAL D=4°54 58 ��. \ BLDG. 1,� / •o Q' s h� ��1 47 SLOPE INDICATOR LOTS OR PADS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY PERMITS BY THE TOWN ENGINEER D=1 °36 38 L=336.32 �'� o- e: 1 FLOOR �� z AND/OR BUILDING OFFICIAL. L=110.18' R=3919.72 - Quo, 42 0`J� �� : 2634 EXISTING TOPD CONTOUR -- PROPOSED TOPO CONTOUR 13. ANY RELOCATION, MODIFICATION, ETC. OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND/OR PUBLIC 48, �� / 41\ Gj / Cl IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED BY THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL BE AT NO EXPENSE TO W S N R G A R D S E Is P S T O R A G\= - �• PROPERTY BOUNDARY THE PUBLIC. N ca C N S N DIVIDED \ / 40 1/E/U EASEMENT PER 49 - - EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY DKT 11564, PG. 3897 & 14. ON -SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, o D P I� 251 P G . 2 2 DKT 11564, PG. 3907 - --- EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS. THE LOCATION AND METHOD o "� FD 3" ACP ON CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO z "' IN CONC ZONING ; T ®P _ , 40 RAMS PASS 50 - - - - - - - - GRADING LIMITS (SEE SHEET 6) L'iREVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT \ 39 LOTS 1 - 8 6 \ ZONING BOUNDARY (PER PIMA MAP GUIDE) DEPARTMENT AT THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL OF PLUMBING OR BUILDING PLANS. 50' I/E/U EASEMENT PER MP BK. 59, P G . 70 74 - - - - - - - EASEMENT AS NOTED ZE 15. ANY WASTEWATER DISCHARGED INTO THE PUBLIC SANITARY SEWERAGE SYSTEM DKT 11564, PG. 3907 I3851 SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE INDUSTRIAL WASTE ORDINANCE (PIMA ZONING : T - P - STREET CENTERLINE COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 1991-140, AS AMENDED). 52 73 100 YR. FLOOD PLAIN LIMITS (SEE SHEET4) CD 16. FLOODPLAINS ARE NOT TO BE ALTERED OR FILLED. 37 2630.72PROP. CONDITION WATER SURFACE ELEV. (SHT 4) 17. THE WATER COMPANY THAT WILL SERVICE THIS DEVELOPMENT IS METROPOLITAN 53 W DOMESTIC WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT. APPRO VALS.- 4' S 4 7 2 PROP. STORM DRAIN PIPE AS NOTED ACP MKD. "USDA" - - E - - - - -- EXISTING UNDER GROUND ELECTRIC 18. ASSESSORS TAX PARCEL IS # 220-04-010M & # 220-04-010J (PORTION) SITE PLAN SHEET INDEX: - _ w - --0- - EXISTING WATER LINE AND VALVE N S. W. COR. SEC. 8 19. NO LIGHT POLES SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG THE EASTERN PARKING BAY ________________________________ __--__- - s - -a- - EXISTING SEWER LINE AND MANHOLE AGAINST THE RESIDENTIAL. GROUND LIGHTING TO BE PROVIDED ORO VALLEY TOWN CLERK DATE 1 OF 6............COVER SHEET & GENERAL NOTES PP 0 20. ALL TRASH ENCLOSURES AND LOADING ZONES TO BE COMPLETELY SCREENED 2 OF 6............NOTES & DEMOLITION PLAN oHE -- EXISTING OVER HEAD ELECTRIC &POWER POLE FROM THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL USES. -------------------------------- -------- 3 OF 6............SITE PLAN X- X EXISTING FENCE 21. APPROVED IMPROVED PLANS AND APPROVED ASSURANCES WILL BE REQUIRED ORO VALLEY TOWN ENGINEER DATE o o NEW BARRICADE RAILING PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS. OWNER DEVELOPER: 4 of 6............FINAL GRADING &PAVING PLAN 5 OF 6............ SECTIONS AND DETAILS ® EXISTING ELECTRIC PEDESTAL TRANSFORMER �o _ 22. THE PROPERTY OWNER, HIS SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS AGREE TO 1 KEEP ALL------------------------------- -------- BIG HORN COMMERCE CENTER, LLC / z ) ORO VALLEY PLANNING & ZONING ADMINISTRATOR DATE 6650 N. ORACLE ROAD, SUITE 100 6 OF 6............ STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN EXISTING TELEPHONE/CABLE TV _ REQUIRED LANDSCAPED AREAS MAINTAINED IN A WEED FREE, TRASH FREE TUCSONCONDITION, 2) REPLACE ANY DEAD PLANT MATERIALS WITHIN 90 DAYS, AND 3) ROBERT, AZ 85704 EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT � ________________________________ ________ ROBERT SOLF/SBURG MAINTAIN THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IN PROPER WORKING ORDER. ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY DIRECTOR DATE (520) 742- 7887 NEW AC PAVEMENT ` 23. THE APPROVAL OF THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN SHALL BE EFFECTIVE FOR TWO I FAX (520) 742-3343 0 o YEARS AFTER THE DATE OF APPROVAL. FEB 0 7 20 24. DESIGN SPEED DOES NOT APPLY ON SITE. RAMS FIELD PASS DESIGN VEHICLE 33. THE OWNER WILL ALLOCATE 1% OF THE CONSTRUCTION COST bob®jbsarizona.com GROUTED ROCK RIPRAP cl- IS SU-30, MINIMUM DESIGN SPEED OF 15 MPH. FOR PUBLIC ART, AS OUTLINED /N ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED. cl- 25 MATERINTERFIALS ERE WITH ASV VISIBILITY PLANE VISIBILITY PLANETRIANGLES DESCRIBED BYMUST BE PLACED TWO HORIZONT�LALINESNOT TO 34. PROHIBITED USES. LEGAL DESCRIPTION HANDPLACED ROCK R/PRAP w - KENNELS FOR BOARDING cn LOCATED THIRTY (30) INCHES AND SEVENTY TWO (72) INCHES ABOVE FINISHED - AUTOMOBILE PARTS STORE PARCELS 220-04-OIOM & A PORTION OF 220-04-OIOJ A PORTION OF THE L'iNEW CONCRETE GRADE OF THE ROADWAY SURFACE. - GROCERY STORE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 14 EAST, GILA o Q 26. NOTIFY BLUE STAKE 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION TO ESTABLISH THE - HARDWARE STORE AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, -_- EXISTING NATURAL GAS FACILITIES LOCATED IN ADJACENT ROW. - CLINIC WITH URGENT CARE FACILITY COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 5, BEING A FOUND EXISTING CONCRETE a - FUNERAL CHAPEL 2-INCH ALUMINUM CAPPED PIPE, THENCE S 891551211E, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE 27. FIRE HYDRANTS CONNECTED TO AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY OF 1,500 GPM - MOTEL OR HOTEL OF SAID SECTION 5 A DISTANCE OF 890.53 FEET TO THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE FOR FIRE PROTECTION, EITHER TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT, SHALL BE - THEATER LINE OF ORACLE ROAD (TUCSON-FLORENCE HIGHWAY) BEING A POINT ON A ��- (SEE SHEET 3) INSTALLED AND IN SERVICE PRIOR TO COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS DELIVERY TO - CONVENIENCE USE, FAST FOOD CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST, WITH A RADIAL BEARING WHICH BEARS N z THE SITE. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION OFFICE TRAILERS ARE CONSIDERED - CAR WASHES 511091521 W REFERENCE NO. 09 PARKING SPACE COUNTS (SEE SHEET 3) COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS. ' - INDOOR RECREATION THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE, TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 3919.72 FEET 28. APPROVED FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS SHALL BE INSTALLED AND IN - AUTO DETAILING AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 41541581FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 336.52 FEET TO Co 12-83-08, P1299-056 HYDRANT SERVICE PRIOR TO COMBUSTIBLE MATERIAL DELIVERY TO SITE. A FOUND NAIL TAGGED "RLS 34551 " BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING FINAL SITE PLAN 35. AN IN -LIEU FEE SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR A CONCRETE � OV 12-05-23 G 1602254 29. TEMPORARY STREET SIGNS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT EA. STREET INTERSECTION SIDEWALK ALONG ORACLE ROAD, SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY THE THENCE N 41 �50'42�W, A DISTANCE OF 6.33 FEET TO A SET "PK"NAIL AND G904-09A, OV911-001 z WHEN CONSTRUCTION OF NEW ROADWAYS ALLOWS PASSAGE OF VEHICLES, ALL TOWN ENGINEER AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING WASHER, TAGGED "RLS 29875 , BEING ON SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF C STRUCTURES UNDER CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED WITH AN ADMINISTRATOR. ORACLE ROAD AND A POINT ON A CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST, WITH A OV1501549 BIG HORN COMMERCECENTER RADIAL BEARING WHICH BEARS N 47110153' W, z APPROVED ADDRESS. 36. PROVIDE SECURITY BARRIERS FOR THE DETENTION BASINS PER THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE AND RIGHT-OF-WAY, TO THE LEFT, HAVING A e °� ADDRESS: 11278 N. ORACLE ROAD, 0 0 30. THE DEVELOPER WILL CONTACT THE LISPS ORO VALLEY BRANCH TO PCDOT 36.2 BASIN REQUIREMENTS. RADIUS OF 3969.72 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 51541541FOR AN ARC a �� PERRY COORDINATE THE PLACEMENT OF THE MAILBOX(ES) AND OBTAIN THE 37. ROOF TOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SCREENED. DISTANCE OF 409.81 FEET TO A SET 1/2-INCH REEBAR, TAGGED "RLS 29875' 34010 ENGINEERING ORO VALLEY, AZ 85737 NECESSARY APPROVALS. KENNETH D.^ 38. FIRST FLUSH IN INLINE FILTRATION SYSTEM. CLEAR WATER THENCE S 48'05' 11 1E, A DISTANCE OF 367.48 FEET TO A SET 1/2-INCH '� -• A PORTION OF THE S.W. 1 4 OF SECTION 5 TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH 31. THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE 0 EXISTING AND 130 PROPOSED WASTEWATER REEBAR, TAGGED "RLS 29875'; oQm99�a�a�a a PERRY��� 505 WEST WETMORE ROAD / Ll- SOLUTION BMP OR UNITED STORM WATER DROP INLET STORMmmmme�mr,�mm �`e 1`1� TUCSON AZ 85705 RANGE 14 EAST GILA &SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY z FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.0245 (EX) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE DRAIN FILTER OR APPROVED EQUAL. THENCE S 48 09 18 W, A DISTANCE OF 445.31 FEET TO A SET 1/2-INCH q S P. PIMA COUNTY AZ w „ Ri s CONTACT. KEN PERRY P.E. 13.20.045(E). 39. THE DEVELOPER SHALL PAY A FAIR SHARE FOR A TRAFFIC REEBAR, TAGGED RLS 29875 ; 2oNa v , THENCE N 41 1 50' 42' W, A DISTANCE OF 299.88 FEET TO THE POINT OF G°aG3 o G°a S PHONE 520.620.9870 SCALE: 1 = 60 CONTOUR INTERVAL= 1. D SIGNAL AT THE INTERSECTION OF ORACLE ROAD AND RAMS P9130120kperry@perryengineering.net OV 17O09SO SHEET ®F 2 � 32. A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY FIELD PASS. BEGINNING. CONTAINING AN AREA OF 3.259 ACRES. � �� � a� , �`' Expires: REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT (RWRD) BEFORE BEGINNING DECEMBER 28, 2017 z z 9 Q GENERAL NOTES 1. UTILITY LOCATIONS AS INDICATED HEREIN WERE COMPILED BASED UPON THE SURVEY PROVIDED BY AMEC INFRASTRUCTURE, INC., PROJECT NUMBER 03-2003-078,. UTILITY LOCATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED TO BE EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE ENGINEER DOES NOT GUARANTEE THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF UTILITIES SHOWN HEREIN. PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE HORIZONTAL LOCATIONS AND VERTICAL ELEVATIONS OF ALL POTENTIALLY AFFECTED UTILITIES WITH THE APPROPRIATE ORGANIZATIONS, POT -HOLING IF NECESSARY. CONTACT "BLUE STAKE" AT 1-800-782-5348 TWO (2) FULL WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. SATURDAYS, SUNDAYS AND HOLIDAYS ARE NOT CONSIDERED WORKING DAYS. 2. THESE GRADING PLANS ARE BASED UPON SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY AMEC INFRASTRUCTURE, INC., PROJECT NO. 03-2003-078. PERRY ENGINEERING, LLC ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY AND NEITHER GUARANTEES NOR WARRANTS THE COMPLETENESS, ACCURACY OR RESULTS OF THIS SURVEY. ORO VALLEY WATER GENERAL NOTES "WATER INFRASTRUCTURE AS REPRESENTED ON THIS PLAN IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. A SEPARATE WATER IMPROVEMENT PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY (OVWU) FOR TECHNICAL REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE STATUTES, CODES AND SPECIFICATIONS. ADDITIONAL WATER INFRASTRUCTURE MAY BE DEEMED NECESSARY UPON REVIEW OF THE WATER IMPROVEMENT PLAN." ENGINEERING GENERAL NOTES 1. BASIS OF ELEVATION A 3' ALUMINUM DISK ON EAST BARRIER WALL APPROXIMATELY 2.91ABOVE ROADWAY AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE ORACLE ROAD BRIDGE OVER THE CANYON DEL ORO WASH, PIMA COUNTY BENCHMARK (NAVD 88) ELEVATION = 2652.09 FEET. 2. ARTERIAL WITHIN SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLES MUST BE PLACED SO AS NOT TO INTERFERE WITH A VISIBILITY PLANE DESCRIBE BY TWO HORIZONTAL LINES LOCATED THIRTY (30) INCHES AND SEVENTY-TWO (72)INCHES ABOVE FINISHED GRADE OF THE ROADWAY SURFACE. 3. FINAL SITE PLANS AND IMPROVEMENT PLANS MUST BE APPROVED FOR COMMERCIAL LOTS OR PADS PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY PERMITS BY THE TOWN ENGINEER AND/OR BUILDING OFFICIAL. DRAINAGE GENERAL NOTES 1. "ALL DRAINAGE WAYS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO APPROVED PLANS PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY PERMITS FROM THE TOWN ENGINEER AND/OR BUILDING OFFICIAL FOR PARCELS AFFECTED." AFFECTED PARCELS MUST BE SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED EITHER BY NUMBER IN NOTE OR BY OUTLINE ON THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. 2. "DRAINAGE MUST BE COLLECTED AND RELEASED FROM A PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT THE LOCATIONS AND IN THE MANNER EXISTING PRIOR TO DEVELOPMENT." 3. "DRAINAGE WAYS MUST BE PROVIDED WHERE NECESSARY TO CARRY DRAINAGE FLOWS THROUGH OR FROM THE DEVELOPMENT AND SUCH DRAINAGE WAYS MUST BE DEDICATED AND MAINTAINED BY PROPERTY OWNERS OR PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION." 4. "DRAINAGE WAYS MUST BE DESIGNED TO NOT DISCHARGE ONTO PAVED STREETS, EASEMENTS OR PARKING AREAS." 5. FIRST FLUSH IN INLINE FILTRATION SYSTEM. CLEAR WATER SOLUTION BMP OR UNITED STORM WATER DROP INLET STORM DRAIN FILTER OR APPROVED EQUAL. 6. "DRAINAGE MUST BE COLLECTED AND RELEASED FROM A PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT THE LOCATIONS AND IN THE MANNER EXISTING PRIOR TO DEVELOPMENT." NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT ALL EXISTING UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND ABOVE GROUND) IN PLACE. EXISTING HIGH VOLTAGE ELECTRICAL LINES AND TELEPHONE, CABLE TV AND OR FIBER OPTIC IN THE VICINITY OF THIS PROJECT. ALL REMOVED ITEMS AND MATERIAL SHALL BE LEGALLY DISPOSED OF OFFSITE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. STEAM PUMP VILLAGE PH. 3 LOTS 1 -7 MP BK. 64 PG. 95 -- ZONING: PAD 0 70 -------�- HIGHWAY _CLORENCE _ TUCSON r (PUBLIC) _ ORACLE ROAD - _ _----- - - - ROUTE 77 STATE _ , 031-1-g13 OT R/W PROJECT NO BP AD AWING NO. D-10-T-342 ADOT DR ------- �;__�� —f-------------_--2635----- �_ c � 2630 =- — — - — —2630— -_— goo -- - s - --- - -s /� - - s - 1-- /�\ W 2 P 01 I OH E P f r / 'vHE Fib I .I� o SHURGARD SELF STORAGE UNSUBDIVIDED DP BK. 25, PG. 22 ZONING: T—P \ EXISTING PAVEMENT WILL REMAIN INP I PLACE. PAVEMENT WILL BE REMOVED 50' I/E/U EASEMENT PER I � AT THE TIME OF NEW PARKING LOF, _,� �o I DKT. 11564, PG. 3907 I I \ CONSTRUCTION I —,---------t-----� -� 0 40' 1/E/U EASEMENT PER DKT 11564, PG. 3897 & DKT. 11564, PG. 3907 DEMOLITION PLAN RAMS PASS LOTS 1 -86 MP BK. 59, PG. 70 ZONING: T-P DEMOLITION KEY NOTES: SALVAGE AND CLEAN ONSITE ROCK WITHIN EXIST. BERM, FOR REUSE ON WEST SLOPE AND WITHIN BASINS. DISCARD ANY FILTER FABRIC (MIN. ALLOWABLE DIA=4", D50 =6') 0 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING FENCE REMOVE EXISTING 3'X3' CONCRETE SLAB (FULL DEPTH) ® SAW CUT & REMOVE EXISTING DEPRESSED CURB AND POST BARRICADE TO ACCOMMODATE NEW SIDEWALK SCUPPERS 50 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF ANY TRASH, DISCARDED ITEMS, BRUSH PILES, WOOD, ETC. FROM WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS © SAW CUT & REMOVE EXISTING VERTICAL CURB TO THE NEAREST JOINT TO ACCOMMODATE NEW CURB ACCESS RAMP @ontar.t Arbnona R 11 at leas4 tvvo hill wurkAnq d-ayti baton; you hogl.n axr.��usntdun ARIZOO N.A8�wi1. Call R11 or click Arizoha811.com� -10 !' N z(]X: SCALE: 1 "=50' C.I.=1' 0 50 11 0 RAMS CANYON PHASE III LOTS "1 -21 MP BK. 56 PG. 33 ZONING: PAD 60' INGRESS/EGRES EASEMENT � 87. 7224, PG. - 50' R/W F BK. 48, PG. II; 1,t RAMS CANYON LOTS 3-55 & 59-89 MP BK. 48 PG. 87 I i t ZONING: PAD t t t NOTES AND DEMOLITION PLAN BIG HORN COMMERCE CENTER ADDRESS: 11278 N. ORACLE ROAD, GPERRY 34010 ENGINEERING ORO VALLEY, AZ 85737 KENNETH D.� PERRY 505 WEST WETMORE ROAD A PORTION OF THE S. W. 1/4 OF SECTION 5 TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, ON 1�\ TUCSON, AZ 85705 RANGE 14 EAST GILA & SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY �R�ZaNA ASP CONTACT. KEN PERRY, P.E. PIMA COUNTY, AZ PHONE: 520.620.9870 SCALE: 1 = 50 CONTOUR INTERVAL= 1.0 Expires: 9130120 kperry©perryengineering.net OV 1700950 SHEET 2 OF 6 DECEMBER 28, 2017 NGE HIGHWAY F��RE TUCSON-- (P_ic) - ORNLE--ROAp-- ; D N _ ---- (STATE ROUTE 77) - -- - OT R/W PROJECT AD Q,� -,� 0 30 60 #gP-031-1-813 m DWG.# D-10-T-342 0 � D SCALE: 1 "=30' EXIST. SEWER M. H. 6886-01A) -� RIM=2638.96 INV.=2610.05 SE. NV.=2608.72 SW. o EXIST. SEWER M. H. .00 4142-1 1) 31 - 8„ SEWER - - 3 EXIST 41 RIM=2631.02 _ �PLANNO.�=83 c� INV.=2608.84 NE. 5' _N r-- 21 INV. =2608. 74 SW. 5 _ w 8 "+ 21 " VCP SEWER (G-83-04N - - -- --- ---- - -_- (1) � W_ EXIST. SEWER M.H. W, -- - _ - W - - .- off ... JV (1) E�`� 8 1801, ---- F_ (3 761- 02) I 10 5 PP.__. 19 11 - 0 1 _— - RIM=2629.76 --- 3 O x INV.=2615.Ofr-S---- y 172.22 Y INV.=2615.41 E. 19 I ' " 9 RAMS FIELD PASS RD 8" PVC SEWER I I g1 32 10 i 8 �, 8 ,Q N .I� PER DKT. 7224, PG. 1387 I �, (G-2002-128) �2) 1 .25� 10 �� ��- 9 0 63 g N ® 9 9 FND. 2 BCSM 6 MARKED "RLS 26058" 710 PER RAMS CANYON "! 0 8 87'43 �! I BK. 48 PG. 87 cn — cn 7 - ry 5 0 9 9 9 N ' 1 N I ° I cn g' MIN. - 81.72' 12.15' m I 6 19 i I 9 10, 8 1 - EXIST SEWER M.H. Iw (6886-01 B) 0 5' �°' CD_ , 5' P �I . I RIM=2634.17 R�5 24 10 g TYP8 RS, -{ 9 8 v 5 v �I INV. _2622.28 NW. Q `� ( 1 1.3' - 1 8 55 T 1 69.34' 1 1 ` 19 60' INV.-2622.39 SE. 11 `r 9'_ o N� 30 I 1 7 INGRESS EGRESS Q ©6 63 ' 8 ' 9 1 604 4 I EASEMENT DKT. 7224, 1 �,S'3 O, 911'' v N I PG. 1387 1 0 N 66.75 0 30 0 4 30.85 L 5 co BLDG. 4 cn� I o v , m a ®- FFE= 33.32 II ��. � � d - o _ Y ' . = o v - � 63.97' 14,960 7FT r FPE I z v, 30.67 R22' 4,960 Q. I I rn I Z 118, BLDG. 2 BLDG. 3 BLDG. 1 FFE=33.20 I FE-32 00 FFE= 32.50 m 'T' 00 00 FPE= 31.3 FPE= 31.8 FPE= 32.5 0 1 G, 4, 012 SQ. FT. 4,750 SQ, FT. 5,263 SQ. FT 36.5 XIS I.' PVMT I 5 5 ' 3' I 118 PVC SEWER (G-96-087) 50' 1/E/U 1 10 5' S I I EASEMENT PER I O 35' DKT. 11564, 24 i 50' R/W PER PG. 1156 o - 5, I I BK. 48, PG. 87 4 (2 1, j 4 8 '�J �� N 9 8! 81 ' I j © 10� 5 10 52.7 6 �� �°�� I82 i g 48i 09' 118"W g ! 4 ,. 1 ,Q�, �� N �' ---- .� s� s. _ - 1 --- -- - ` ' `Y ` --T, _. _T _ - ------------s� 0'- g -- 1 — ,o Q`� o - 6 I FND. 2" BCSM /l1 2�' i� 77Tj T/?T 7T ; ; i T R2 1 0 0 7 ,� - I --- MARKED "RLS 26058" R 7 09 ( (A 9 ( i 9 p�,,' ire I 1 I FR RAMS CANYON 63' 10' 8,,,(:) i 0, 81 I 82' , ---- BK 4 PG 87 _48' b16 -9- 4 ` EXIST. SEWER M.H. 1 g 40' 1/E/U EASEMENT PER N EXIST. SEWER M.H. (3761-03) DKT 11564, PG. 3897 �\ i (6886-03)___ RIM=2628.19 SITE PLAN �� RIM=2633.62 INV.=2618.09 NW. �\ II INV.=2623.42 NW. INV.=2623.52 SE. \� I \\ I I I o � I I i FND. 2" BCSM NI MARKED "RLS 2605B" I PER RAMS CANYON I BK. 48, PG. 87 � I I I i fa,t.ict Arbz•ana R I 1 ;,t Ir.ast iv�o gull v�urbinq d-ays br,ta,rc you degln r>wravaldua, /�R�ZONA8�1�1. �Gal'I (iit or -click Ari•zonaE311.eomJ SITE PLAN KEYNOTES C1 SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE 240' (LEFT), 190' (RIGHT) 02 (8) - 2.5' TYPE 2 SIDEWALK SCUPPERS PER PAG SD. 205 03 CONCRETE HEADER PER PAG SD. 213 ® CONCRETE CURB, NEW TO EXISTING PER PAG SD 211 �5 CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER PAG SD. 200 © CURB ACCESS RAMP PER PAG SD. 207 07 SAW, CUT, TRIM, TACK AND JOIN PAVEMENT TO EXIST. PAVEMENT. SAWCUT MIN. OF 1 FT. INTO EXIST. PAVEMENT TO PROVIDE UNIFORM CONSTRUCTION JOINT ® CONCRETE VERTICAL CURB (TYPE 2) PER PAG SD. 209 O CONC. WHEEL STOP PER DETAIL E ON SHT. 5 OF 6 10 2.5" AC OVER 4" ABC PER DETAIL F, ON SHT 5 OF 6, TYPICAL ALL NEW ASPHALT PAVING 11 EF-1 GRATES PER PAG SD. 311. WI TH (1) 12" 0 CMP (GRA TES TO BE BOL TED FOR MAINTENANCE ACCESS) 12 6" CONCRETE SLAB, DESIGN STRENGTH 3,000 P. S.I. W/#4 REBAR, 12" 0. C. BOTH WAYS. TAP AND JOIN CONC. TO NEW PVMT SURFACE. 10 ADA PARKING SIGN, SEE DTL. 1, SHEET C4 14 REPLACE EXISTING 8" WATER TEE WITH 8x8x8x8 CROSS TEE 1� NOT USED 1� CONCRETE CURB TERMINATION SECTIONS PER PAG SD. 212 10 (4) 36" 0 SRP, UNDERGROUND STORAGE PIPES 1a 14' X 40' CLEAR APPROACH FOR REFUSE CONTAINER NEW HANDPLACED RIPRAP D50=6", 12" THICK OVER MIRAFI FILTER FABRIC ® REFUSE AND RECYCLE ENCLOSURE, SEE DETAIL I ON SHT. 5 OF 6. 0 TYPICAL "TYPE B" PAVEMENT PATCH PER PAG SD. 216 ® DETENTION BASIN, SEE GRADING PLAN - SHT 4 OF 6 © FLOOD WALL BY SEPARATE PLANS 30' LANDSCAPE BUFFERYARD SETBACKS © GROUTED ROCK RIPRAP, D50=67 EMBEDDED 1/2 D50 INTO 6" THICK, 3,000 PSI CONCRETE WITH FIBERMESH ® NEW BARRICADE RAILING PER PAG SD. 105 ® NOT USED ® EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT �a EXIST. 62"X40" CMP ARCH CULVERT OUTLET 20' X 20' DRAINAGE ACCESS/MAINTENANCE EASEMENT BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT 31 EXISTING (4) - 24"0 CORRUGATED HDPE CULVERTS TO REMAIN ® NEW 48 LF. OF 12" 0 RCP © NEW 42" 0 RCP STORM DRAIN PIPE, 110 LF AT 0.85.% SLOPE ® 3 - COURT YARD AREAS. TOTAL AREA= APPROX. 1,500 SF. WITH STEEL SCREENS. SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR DETAIL. © 10'X35' LOADING SPACE WITH 5 FT TALL SCREEN WALL. WITH STEEL SCREENS. Q CONCRETE WEDGE CURB, 1' WIDE WITH 0.5' REVEALED AND 3' TRANSITION FROM VERTICAL TO WEDGE CURB. © 5' WIDE CROSSWALK, STRIPED WITH TRUNCATED DOMES AT ENDS. TO BE DETAILED ON CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. ® VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE. OPEN AREA CALCULATIONS SITE = 141,962 SQ. FT. 100. 0% OPEN AREA = 47,273 SQ. FT. 33.30% CONSTRUCTION = 28,985 SQ. FT. 20.42% PARKING CALCULATIONS BASE ON BUILDING FOOT PRINTS ACTUAL USAGE PER OCCUPIED SPACE TO BE DETERMINED. RESTAURANT = 6,000 SF. 10/1000 SF. 60 GENERAL RETAIL = 22,985 SF. 4/1000 SF 91.94 TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED = 152 TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED = 152 REQUIRED MIN. NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE SPACES 152/50 + 1 = 3 ADA SPACES PROVIDED = 8 SPACES RESTAURANT (6 STAND. ADA & 2 ADA VAN ACCESSIBLE) BICYCLE PARKING PROVIDED: 153/15 = 10.20 SPACES 50 % CLASS 1 = 5 50 Z CLASS II = 5 (THE CLASS II BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE OF INVERTED U TYPE) LOADING SPACES REQUIRED TOTAL SF = 29,025 COMMERCIAL LOW INTENSITY REQUIRED: 2 PROVIDED: 2 SITE PLAN BIG HORN COMMERCE CENTER ° PERRY ADDRESS: 11278 N. ORACLE ROAD, pop 0 3NE ENGINEERING ORO VALLEY, AZ 85737 KENNETH D.� ^ PERRY 505 WEST WETMORE ROAD A PORTION OF THE S. W. 1/4 OF SECTION 5 TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, TUCSON, AZ 85705 RANGE 14 EAST GILA &SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY NA 0- CONTACT.• KEN PERRY, P.E. PIMA COUNTY, AZ INTERVAL= 1.0 PHONE: 520.620.9870 SCALE: 1 = 30 CONTOUR Expires: 9130120 kperry@perryengineering.net OV 1700950 SHEET 3 OF 6 DECEMBER 28, 2017 _ RENCE HIGHWAY- TUCSpN FL- CLE-_-R_u11 UB____ LAC)__ - ORA - _ (STATE ROUTE 77) I __-__-- - -- - --_._- W PROJECT - - - ADOT R1 #8P-031-I-813 DWG.# D-10T-342 m 0 30 60 i o _ _ �\ _ 1 ___---------2638- _ \\\ '�\\ c' SCALE: 1"=30' Uo C.1. =1. 0' ---------- - ----2637----..iiiIIi II J = J Y35- ---26 -r --- ,wo ----- -___--- _---iv--2635---- \\\\ v 11 OFF1 ----- -----_ - - -- rn \� \11\ 1 c_- wo -- -- - - 26343548 ��----o __--- -- DA=18.5 ,- am.; �\�\U� 11��s •�2633--' _ - . ;� ll -- `.rn�/ /N� _--- -------_---�263INV=30.0- \\1O10 / - -- - �`' --- - --- -- o-- _ _- �__--2631.D.F. ---\\ �1/� -- o - _ -•---_------ 1--- - cn mJ4-- cn --- OFF3= _INV=32.1__100-YR. FLOODINV=2626:--- Q100=130 fsiF o PLAIN LIMITS_ __ 100-YR. FLOOD p ,,INV.=2626.0 i / -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - - -- DA=22.3 CJ INV.=2626.93 PLAIN LIMITS �� /-.---� O B \ C INV.=27� I I 4 OT. 27. 00 4 TC3 .37 TC=31.08 IN'V. .57 G=30,52- 1 -------- --- - co W \ 2 5,1 �' . 6 98 -2633, ! _2 RAMS FIELD PASS RD TC- c,-2632= G=2 .07 - - -- - - - -- - 1 -- - -- - - - - 2631- - _��-�'- _- - % PER DKT. 7224, PG. 1387 __ _ -2630 __ _ _ FROM SITE - cf _O - -----2629-- - ------ --- , •S�, / `�' a� N FND. 2 BCSM PROP ET FLO _ li'1� 3:1 -2628- g�- % -0.7% �o ` I �; MARKED "RLS 26058„ EXIS G SHE PER RAMS CANYON FLO; FROM S :1 i m \\ \ 2 o BK. 48, PG. 87 Q 100=13.8cfs m B o DA=2.7 AC i \ ,� o 100/ YR. FLOOD 1kc 5 I �o �o �� / / �, PLAIN LIMITS `\ ' �' I -BOTTOM ELEV. ? 0 \ 1 o 100!�YR PONDING 11� . EL-2629.13 �. 1 30. o I� ,` , ��. 1 cps, 27.0 3 os •�� 0� \1 \ 1 z • \ I ,a 50' 1/E/U EASEMENT 8 84 - i / 9.23 c��� I c�`�o / 11 I It i 111 II 0' I DKT. 11564, PG. 3907 �c2 io \� 6 Vol 29.2E1 II11 II i INGRESS EGRESS n, 3 .0�^ �° o �� �' I I I III III j� I EASEMENT DKT. 7224, 2 PG. 1387 I I I j .,. Q NEW 48 LF. BLDG. 4 I I I I i I OF 12"� RCP Ii - °..; a' i �6, FFE=33.32 I I I I i I I w - a r' o o FPE=32.7 1 I I I II I I �, �, I -- 3 ^��` 14, 960 SQ. FT. I IN =3 I I Q Q it I Z m f� I OFF2 I. a I II `I' III 8 FLOW THRU Z co SCUPPERS Q `� I C� i v i BLDG. 2 it 2632 III I T�33. - I 2 1.1 BLDG. 3 1 i Q 100 =16.1 cfs BLDG. 1 / FFE=32.50 / I cn o BOTTOM ELEV 26 7.31 �s l FPE=31.8 IEEE _33.20 I / I 1 I I1 V 32., i Q m 9 FFE=32.00 / l `- ° I DA=2.1 AC o 100-YR PON ING \ FPE=31.3 FPE-32.5 O I a. \ / 4, 750 SQ. FT. $, 263 SQ. FT. I 1 I i I I I I o ELEV=2629.1 4, 012 SQ. FT / I I I I I AST. PVML� I 1 q �� A l I I N I I , I 5 / F I I I n� I I III I II � .` -- 50 77 �I �I III T ll I ' R W PER 3 / / , l BK. 48, PG. 87 5\ I 20' 24' 20' SIDEWALK WHEEL STOP PER MATCH EXIST. GRADE DTL. E ON SHT. 5 VARIES 2. 09 . CONC. VERTICAL CURB J PER PAG STD. 209 TYPE 2 ITC 28.9 o ' °p �' $� I I I _ G 3 .11 AC=31.07 ��, ��, / N �� -- -- r' TC=34.20 \ _ T. O.P. 30.05 G 8.44 62 INV. =27.05 \ -ch - i l �`6 �, , o �, 0 '� I FND. 2 BCSM 4) I �� MARKED "RLS 26058" PER RAMS CANYON co BK. 48, PG. 87 2' 20' 4 24' PAAI WEST P.A.A.L. (TYP, 20' 2n' 94' PAAI SCALE: 1`_ 10' ROD AC , . T.O.P. 30.10 INV. =27.10 FND. 2" BCSM MARKED "RLS 26058" PER RAMS CANYON I BK. 48, PG. 87 @o nPa r.t Arbao n:r B11 art Ica9t tv�o foil w.orkdnq rhi�ys hcrure yo11 1W (I TIlluxn;aua4don ARC O A8»�1. �Cakl 811 or (:lick Ari.zondt811.con� 100-YEAR WSEL=2630.E MAX FLAPGATE SEE ---� DETAIL D SHEET 5 CMU WALL BY OTHERS EAST P.A.A.L. (TYP SCALE: 1 -10' MIN. TOP EL. =31.6 (SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS BY OTHERS) Z'�, CARIES (SEE PLAN) 1,28 D" VARIES V WSEL=29.13 3 MIN. 0.5 BASIN INV. =27.00 _ WEST DETENTION BASIN D /I R 5' CONC. VERTICAL CURB PER PAG STD. 209 TYPE 2 2.5' PARKING LOT NOTE. • CONTRACTOR TO SALVAGE AND CLEAN ONSITE ROCK ALONG EXIST. BERM, THEN PLACE OVER FILTER FABRIC AS INDICATED. (MIN. ALLOWABLE DIA=4 , D50 =6') SCALE. • 1 `5' NORTHEAST SCUPPER INLET ® UPSTREAM END GRADING FOR UNDERGROUND STORAGE TYPE 2 SCUPPERS SD 205 6.1 CFS SCALE. • 1 `5' A /%- 7 4 /) 4 SCALE. • 1 "-20' i . U. r' w. 00 INV. =27.60 FINAL GRADING AND PAVING PLAN BIG HORN COMMERCE CENTER i e PERRY ADDRESS: 11278 N. ORACLE ROAD, 34010 D.^ ENGINEERING ORO VALLEY, AZ 85737 KENNETH PERRY �� 505 WEST WETMORE ROAD A PORTION OF THE S. W. 1/4 OF SECTION 5 TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, TUCSON, AZ 85705 RANGE 14 EAST GILA & SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY gRi2pNA *SP CONTACT. KEN PERRY, P.E. PIMA COUNTY, AZ PHONE: 520.620.9870 SCALE: 1 = 30 CONTOUR INTERVAL= 1.0 Expires: 9130120 kperry@perryengineering.net OV 1700950 SHEET 4 OF 6 DECEMBER 28, 2017 21 'f GROUTED ROCK RIPRAP EMBEDDED 1/2 D50 INTO 6" THICK 3,000 PSI CONCRETE WITH FIBERMES --v EXISTING SIDEWALK 2' 13.5' TO REMAIN �J 21 't 3 �1 EXTEND 0. 5' VERTICALLY INTO BASIN BOTTOM NEW BARRICADE RAILING PER PAG SD. 105. SEE SHEET 3 OF 6 FOR LENGTH 2' BLDG. 5' S/w= SOUTHWEST DEPRESSED AREA 1 SCALE: 1 "=5' EXISTING SIDEWALK TO REMAIN HAND PLACED ROCK RIP -RAP OVER FILTER FABRIC, D5o=6" 12" THICK GROUTED ROCK RIPRAP EMBEDDED 112 D50 INTO 6" THICK 3,000 PSI CONCRETE WITH FIBERMESH 12' VARIES 3 -- F EXTEND 0. 5' VERTICALLY INTO BASIN BOTTOM SOUTHEAST DEPRESSED AREA 2 SCALE: 1 "=5' a 2' TYP OVERBUILD a� PROP. SIDEWALK SCUPPERS TOC=33.31 G=32.64 01 *�34.0 SAW -CUT REMOVE & REPLACE MIN. OF 1 FT. BY 22 LF. INTO EXIST. s PAVEMENT TO PROVIDE UNIFORM CONSTRUCTION JOINT. l0 �s s TOC=33.37 �Q G= 32.65 q0 k(E RRICADE RAILING XIST. CONC. VERTICAL CURB ` d NEW 5' y SIDEWALK CONIC. .a 8-NEW SIDEWALK SCUPPERS PER PAG DTL. 205 (SIDEWALK SUPPER TYPE 2) 1"- 10, ORBINOX 12 0 FLAP GATE MOUNTED PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS (FOR WALL DETAILS, SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS BY OTHERS) BASIN. } INV=7;OOo 4 b ORBINOX "RC" (36" X 6") MODEL \ SQUARE FLAP GATE MOUNTED PER o MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS o INV. =27.33 INV. =28.50 FLAP GATES NOTE DO NOT USE SPRING LOADED FLAP MECHANISM 11=5' CLASS "S" CONC (3000 PSI, 28 DA YS) REQUIRED CRS-2 MASTIC TACK UNDER CURB A. C. �\ #4 REBAR ® 3' LONG 3' TO ANY OBSTRUCTION 6 �- 2» R CONCRETE WHEEL STOP 2.5 A. C. 4" A.B.C. -� SUBGRADE COMPACTED PER T ' 1_1 1�=1Ti=1Ti- III��IIIIIIII��i,L��,li �llllllr- GEOTECH REPORT ASPHALT PAVEMENT SECTION 0" x 1'-6" x .080 A-LU.MIIqUM HANtDICAI',PED --- - --- PARKING SIGN. SIGN TO READ '°RESERVED PARKING" & "ORO VALLEY TOWN CODE SEC 11-4--3.A" W/IDENTIFICATION SYMBOL RESERVE[' PER 2006 IBC CH.11, ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003, PARKING SE-C. 502.7. BOLT TO STEEL TUBE W/ 3/8" C.ADMIU�m PLATED BOLTS, NUTS & WAS"ERS Er�VAtigYiQyNCODE SEC 11-4-3.A "VAN ACCESSIBLE" _ -- "'VAN ACCESSIBLE o�c (WHERE INDICATED) "U"—CHAN-N.EL POST (2—LBS/FT) 6" PIPE BOLLARD FILLED WITH CONCRETE SLOPE TOP OF CONCRETE GROUND/PAVING SURFACF �I c- P.C. CONCRETE 3 1'-6" HANDICAP PARKING SIGN 3500 P.S.I NTS NTS co _I CD i 'tom NTS 0 0 N 1" CAP BLOCK 3" MASONRY CMU SCREEN WALL, W/ No. 4 IERTICAL BARS AND GROUTED CELLS ® 32" AND IORIZONTAL JOINT REINFORCEMENT@ 16 O.C. 1AINT WALLS PER OWNER DIRECTION. CHEDULE 40 C.S. PIPE BOLLARD FILLED CONCRETE, 4'-0" ABOVE SLAB 6" CONCRETE SLAB. W/ No. 4 REBAR AT 12" O.C. BOTH WAYS, DESIGN STRENGTH 3,000 P.S.I. * 24" CONCRETE FOOTING W/ 2EA NO. 4 REBARS AT CONTINUES, DESIGN STRENGTH 3,000 P.S.I. WALL & BOLLARD CROSS SECTION 4z z z' 13.33' y r 7 NTS 8" MASONRY CMU SCREEN WALL, PER CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, SEE 6" CONCRETE SLAB, DESIGN STRENGTH 3,000 P.S.I. WITH #4 BARS 12" O.C. BOTH WAYS. QTY 4ea 4" SCHEDULE 40 C.S. PIPE BOLLARDS FILLED WITH CONCRETE 4' ABOVE SLAB QTY tea ENCLOSURE GATE SUPPORTS, 4"x4"x3/16: 6'-0" LONG w/ 5/8" DIAMETER 6" MINIMUM EMBED AB ANCHORED 12" O.C. HINGED AND WELDED TO GATE QTY 2eo ENCLOSURE GATES, GATE FRAME TO BE CONSTRUCTED OF 3"x3"x3/16" SQUARE STEEL TUBING w/ INTER CROSS -BRACE AND 1/8" STEEL PLATE SURFACE WELDED ON BOTH SIDES QTY 4ea 1" DIAMETER GALVANIZED PIPE 0'-6" LONG EMBEDDED FLUSH WITH TOP OF CONCRETE RAMP TO ALLOW DOORS TO BE ANCHORED IN THE OPEN OR CLOSED POSITION SINGLE CONTAINER ENCLOSURE (2 TO. 8 CUBIC YARDS) (PER T. S. M. SECTION 8) FIGURE 38 NTS SECTIONS AND DETAILS BIG HORN COMMERCE CENTER a G ERRY ADDRESS: 11278 N. ORACLE ROAD, 34010 ORO VALLEY, AZ 85737 KEN NEE R D. ENGINEERING 0PER� , 505 WEST WETMORE ROAD A PORTION OF THE S.W. 114 OF SECTION 5 TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, CHI aago 4wmo0°RANGE 14 EAST GILA & SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY TUCSON, AZ 85705 PIMA COUNTY, AZ �Rr2pNA ASP CONTACT. KEN PERRY, P.E. , PHONE: 520.620.9870 SCALE: AS NOTED CONTOUR INTERVAL= 1.0 Expires: 9130120 kperry@perryengineering.net Ov1700950 SHEET 5 OF 6 DECEMBER 28, 2017 I Q I F ENCE HIGHWAY- T�CSON FOR-- -.—_ (PUBLIC) ORACLE ROAD --- _ ----- _ (STATE ROUTE 77) ADOT R/W PROJECT #SP-031—I-813 DWG # 0-10—T-342 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN SCALE. 1 "=30' C.I.=1' KEY NOTES LEGEND O SEDIMENT WATTLES. SEE D TL. 2, THIS SHEET .......... • AND GRADING LIMITS O2 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. SEE DTL. 1, THIS SHEET O3 MATERIAL DELIVERY AND STORAGE, AND STAGING AREA. ....... STORAGE STAGING O HAZARDOUS, SOLID, AND LIQUID WASTE AREAS. WASTE STORAGE O5 VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT FUELING AREA. MEUNG/ MAINT. GEOTEXTILE UNDE STA 18 (TY r GondacT Arl•zona n 1 i at least tv�o i,eill vlorkdtrt7 da�yn bctorc you t�r.gin axcauaUla ARC O A8���1. `Call 811 or click Arizou.�fi1 t.cont OTA . STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE lA TED SOIL 'SLOPE SIDE NTS TYPICAL WATTLE SPACING BASED ON SLOPE GRADIENT STRAW WATTLE INSTALLATION NTS STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN BIG HORN COMMERCE CENTER ADDRESS: 11278 N. ORACLE ROAD, y ""' ENGINEERING ORO VALLEY, AZ 85737 KENNETH D. PERRY505 WEST WETMORE ROAD A PORTION OF THE S. W. 114 OF SECTION 5 TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, �es• 1�\ TUCSON, AZ 85705 RANGE 14 EAST GILA & SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY �R�2oNA ASP CONTACT.• KEN PERRY, P.E. PIMA COUNTY, AZ PHONE. 520.620.9870 SCALE: 1 " = 30' CONTOUR INTERVAL= 1.0' Expires: 9130120 kperry@perryengineering.net OV 1700950 SHEET 6 OF 6 DECEMBER 28, 2017 FINAL RAINWATER WATER HARVESTING PLAN BIG HORN COMMERCIAL CENTER AY — ---'�- TUCSON - FLORENCE �- --- ORACLE_ ROAD (PSLIC HIGHWAY ' —(STATE ROUTE �--- —-- ADOT R�W PRGJECT Ci �/BP-031- -813 DWG.// D-107-34.2 �� F R r • N i M1 1 i^y mmE BLDG. 1 BLDG. 2 1 FLOOR 1 FLOOR BLDG. 3 1 FLOOR i RAMS PASS SITE PLAN MP PG LOTS 9 - BK. 59, PG. 70 ZONING: T--P GENERAL SITE NOTES 1. THE GROSS AREA OF THE DEVELOPMENT SITE IS 3.26 ACRES. 2. THE GROSS FLOOR AREA IS 0.0 SF. 3. THE FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) REQUIRED FOR THE COMMERCIAL PORTION IS 0.30 MAXIMUM. THE ACTUAL FAR PER THE APPROVED PAD IS 0.16. 4. THE GROSS AREA OF ALL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE IS 117,026 S.F. OR 2.69 AC. 5. TOTAL MILES OF NEW PUBLIC STREETS IS 0 MILES. 6. TOTAL MILES OF NEW PRIVATE STREETS IS 0 MILES. 7. ASSURANCES FOR SITE IMPROVEMENTS, LANDSCAPING AND REVEGETATION BONDS MUST BE POSTED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS. 8. THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT IS 25' OR 2 STORIES. 9. TOTAL AREA OF OPEN SPACE REQUIRED = 33% OF THE GROSS AREA OF THE SITE. TOTAL AREA OF OPEN SPACE PROVIDED = 47,226 S.F.. 10. LANDSCAPED BUFFER -YARDS REQUIRED SEE TABLE 11. REQUIRED BUILDING SETBACKS: NORTH - 25' REQUIRED, SOUTH - 25' REQUIRED, EAST - 25' REQUIRED, 12. EXISTING ZONING IS C-1(COMMERCIAL DISTRICT) TOWN OF ORO VALLEY OV1 700950 I 0 60 1 0 SCALE. 1 =60 I� 1 N �o Q_ 5 z C" 60 o z BLDG. 4 1 FLOOR WATER HARVESTING CALCULATION INITIAL DEVELOPMENT ONLY CALCULATIONS: IMPERVIOUS COVER 5,000 S.F. - .11 ACRE REQUIRED WATER HARVESTING REQUIREMENT - 3,000 GAL. X .11=330 GALS. WATER HARVESTING PROVIDED: WATER HARVESTING BASIN AREAS = 2,877 S.F. x MIN. 4" DEPTH = 863 CUBIC FEET 863 CUBIC FEET X 7.48 GAL. = 6,455 GALS. MIN. REQUIRED VOLUME OF RAINWATER HARVESTING - 330 GALLONS RAINWATER HARVESTING PROVIDED: 6,455 GALS. FULL SITE DEVELOPMENT -CALCULATIONS: IMPERVIOUS COVER 117,026 S.F. - 2.69 ACRES REQUIRED WATER HARVESTING REQUIREMENT - 31000 GAL. X 2.69 ACRES =8,070 GALS. WATER HARVESTING PROVIDED: WATER HARVESTING BASIN AREAS = 7,348 S.F. x MIN. 4" DEPTH = 2,204 CUBIC FEET 2,204 CUBIC FEET X 7.48 GAL.=16,485 GALS. MIN. REQUIRED VOLUME OF RAINWATER HARVESTING - 8,070 GALLONS RAINWATER HARVESTING PROVIDED: 16,485 Gal. RAINWATER HARVESTING MEASURES EMPLOYED FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING: PASSIVE MEASURES PROVIDED Contact Arinona 81 i at least two Tull , workIn, egln excay.�tlon AR�ZONA ��11. r Call 811 or click Arizorta811.com, ACCEPTED BY: PLANNING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR DATE TOWN ENGINEER DATE SHEET INDEX RH-0 COVER SHEET RH-1 RAINWATER HARVESTING PLAN /_DvE ND EG EXISTING GROUND TOE TOE OF BERM, SLOPE ETC. T. 0. P. TOP OF PIPE FL SLOPE ETC. FLOWLINE OF SWALE ACP ALUM. CAP IN CONC. LCP LEAD CAPPED PIPE I/E/U INGRESS/EGRESS & UTILITIES FPE FINISHED PAD ELEVATION FPE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION NG NATURAL GROUND INV INVERT A. C AGGREGATED CONCRETE BOT BOTTOM 21.53--l-. PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION (AS NOTED) D.F. DRAINAGE FLOW ARROWS DRAINAGE © FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT AS NOTED O FND. 112" IRON ROD, RLS 29873 41 DISCHARGE POINT SLOPE INDICATOR _ - -2634---._ — EXISTING TOPO CONTOUR 2634—' PROPOSED TOPO CONTOUR OWNERS/DEVELOPER BIG HORN COMMERCE CENTER, LLC 6650 N. ORACLE ROAD, SUITE 100 TUCSON, ARIZONA 85704 ATTN: MR. ROBERT SOLFISBERG TEL. (520) 742-7887 bob@jbsarizona.com C_,ivH Erainco �, ORO THIS - PROJFG iANS CANTON PAD ORO VALLEY T-P OV ,o �S N IAN5I�DI,//0� PAD ORO VALLEY SCALE. 3 -1 MILE 1% LOCATION MAP A PORTION OF THE S. W. 1 /4 OF SECTION 5 TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 14 EAST GILA & SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PIMA COUNTY, AZ SCALE.' 3 "=1 MILE PROPERTY BOUNDARY EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY — — — — — — GRADING LIMITS (SEE SHEET 6) ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ZONING BOUNDARY (PER PIMA MAP GUIDE) — — EASEMENT AS NOTED -- -- STREET CENTERLINE 100 YR. FLOOD PLAIN LIMITS (SEE SHEET4) 2630.72 PROP. CONDITION WATER SURFACE ELEV (SHT 4) �— PROP. STORM DRAIN PIPE AS NOTED — — E — — EXISTING UNDER GROUND ELECTRIC — — — w — EXISTING WATER LINE AND VALVE - — S — EXISTING SEWER LINE AND MANHOLE OHE PP EXISTING OVER HEAD ELECTRIC & POWER POLE x x EXISTING FENCE NEW BARRICADE RAILING ® EXISTING ELECTRIC PEDESTAL/TRANSFORMER ❑T EXISTING TELEPHONE/CABLE TV EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT I NEW AC PAVEMENT GROUTED ROCK RIPRAP HANDPLACED ROCK RIPRAP d a NEW CONCRETE e a EXISTING CONCRETE SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE (SEE SHEET 3) �9 PARKING SPACE COUNTS (SEE SHEET 3) �--®- HYDRANT ►;, OV1700950 EFERENCE NO. Co12-83-08, P1299-056 OV12-05-23, G1602254 E SH EET E ET OV150154�V911-001 COVER 9 /„r GENERAL WATER HARVESTING NOTES DNCE DDDDD TU D S D D FL � R PDUBLIC) _____--.-- ------`._--- ORAC LE ROAD _ ----- - - __' (STATE ROUTE 77 - - ADOT R/W PROJE CT #gp-031-1-813 DD # D-10T-342_- s LEOEND 51'M50L DESGRIF'TION r� BASIN AREA i I I ow- rin t _ fii I� owl m EwellI • r31 � ���p,f��il .�� I : �� , `•, �+ �: 1 � I ••- FLOORBLDG. 2 BLDG. 3 BLDG. 4 1 FLOOR I ;; •O- D v 50A_E: I" = 50'-0" O' 15' 50' 60' RAMS f ASS LOTS 1-86 BK. 59, PG. 7niin/n• T D r Contact Arizona 811 at least two full working days �etore you begin e�xcavatlon AR�ZUO NA :11. Call 811 or click Arizona811.com, BASIN GONNEGTION FLOW D I REGTI ON ARRON BASIN FLOA LINE INITIAL DE\/ELO='MENT 1. TOTAL AREA OF ALL NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACES INCLUDING ROCK RIP -RAP ONLY FULL SITE DEVELOPMENT ONLY IS 117,026 S.F. - 2.69 ACRES MINIMUM RAINWATER HARVESTING REQUIRES = 3000GALS X 2.69 AC = 8,070 GALS 2. TOTAL VOLUME OF RAINWATER HARVESTING PROVIDED IS 16,488 GAL. 3. RAINWATER HARVESTING MEASURES EMPLOYED FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING: PASSIVE MEASURES PROVIDED WATER HARVESTING CALCULATION WATERSHED AREA INITIAL DEVELOPMENT ONLY CALCULATIONS: Uj 41 Q' cL q Q z� CU � � O Q 00 cl- OWNERS/DEVELOPER BIG HORN COMMERCE CENTER, LLC 6650 N. ORACLE ROAD, SUITE 100 TUCSON, ARIZONA 85704 ATTN: MR. ROBERT SOLFISBERG TEL. (520) 742-7887 bob@jbsarizona.com IMPERVIOUS COVER 5,000 S.F. - .11 ACRE REQUIRED WATER HARVESTING REQUIREMENT - 3,000 GAL. X .11=330 GALS. WATER HARVESTING PROVIDED: WATER HARVESTING BASIN AREAS = 2,877 S.F. x MIN. 4" DEPTH = 863 CUBIC FEET 863 CUBIC FEET X 7.48 GAL. = 6,455 GALS. MIN. REQUIRED VOLUME OF RAINWATER HARVESTING - 330 GALLONS RAINWATER HARVESTING PROVIDED: 6,455 GALS. FULL SITE DEVELOPMENT - CALCULATIONS: IMPERVIOUS COVER 117,026 S.F. - 2.69 ACRES REQUIRED WATER HARVESTING REQUIREMENT - 3,000 GAL. X 2.69 ACRES =8,070 GALS. WATER HARVESTING PROVIDED: WATER HARVESTING BASIN AREAS = 7,348 S.F. x MIN. 4" DEPTH = 2,204 CUBIC FEET 2,204 CUBIC FEET X 7.48 GAL.=16,485 GALS. MIN. REQUIRED VOLUME OF RAINWATER HARVESTING - 8,070 GALLONS RAINWATER HARVESTING PROVIDED: 16,485 Gal. ClIYIl Eneinoor OV 1700950 REFERENCE NO. Co12-83-08, P1299-056 OV12-05-23, G1602254 G904-09A, OV911-001 OV1501549 GENERAL SITE NOTES 1. THE GROSS AREA OF THE DEVELOPMENT SITE IS 3.259 ACRES. NET BUILDING AREA = 27,905 SF. 2. ZONING C-1 3. BUILDING GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE = 29,025 SF.T 3. PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS C-1 COMMERCIAL DISTRICT FLOOR AREA RATIO - .2045 OPEN SPACE = 33.3% TOTAL GROSS FLOOR AREA <.25 NET LOT AREA. BUILDING HEIGHT = 25' TOTAL OPEN SPACE PROVIDED - 47,226 SF. 4. LANDSCAPED BUFFER -YARDS REQUIRED SEE TABLE BELOW. 5. REQUIRED BUILDING SETBACKS: NORTH - 25' REQUIRED, SOUTH - 25' REQUIRED, EAST - 25' REQUIRED, GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES 1. ASSURANCES FOR LANDSCAPING AND REVEGETATION BONDS MUST BE POSTED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS. 2. PROPERTY OWNER SHALL MAINTAIN BUFFER YARD PLANTINGS TO ENSURE UNOBSTRUCTED VISIBILITY TO MOTORISTS. ALL SHRUBS, ACCENTS AND GROUNDCOVERS SHALL NOT EXCEED THIRTY(30") INCHES IN HEIGHT WITHIN SITE VISIBILITY TRIANGLES. TREES WITHIN SITE VISIBILITY TRIANGLES WILL BE MAINTAINED TO ENSURE THAT BRANCHES/FOILAGE IS NOT BELOW A HEIGHT OF SIX (6') FEET. 3. IN THE EVENT OF ABANDONMENT OF THE SITE AFTER GRADING/DISTURBANCE OF NATURAL AREAS, DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE REVEGETATED WITH A NON -IRRIGATED HYRO-SEED MIX FROM THE OVZCR ADDENDUM D: APPROVED REVEGETATION SEED MIX. 4. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL MEETTHE MINIMUM STANDARDS CONTAINED IN THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE ARIZONA NURSERY ASSOCIATION'S GROWERS COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED TREE SPECIFICATIONS AND THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMAN AS TO SIZE, CONDITION AND APPEARANCE. 5. MATERIALS WITHIN SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLES MUST BE PLACED SO AS NOT TO INTERFERE WITH A VISIBILITY PLANE DESCRIBED BY TWO HORIZONTAL LINES LOCATED THIRTY (30") INCHES AND SEVENTY TWO (72")INCHES ABOVE FINISHED GRADE OF THE ROADWAY SURFACE. 6. DEEP ROOTED VEGETATION AND TREES SHALL NOT BE PLANTED CLOSER THAN 7.5' FROM A PUBLIC WATER LINE. EXCEPTIONS FOR ALTERNATIVE DESIGN SOLUTIONS SUCH AS ROOT BARRIERS SHALL BE CONSIDERED ON A CASE BY CASE BASIS. 7. THE OWNER WILL ALLOCATE 1%OF THE CONSTRUCTION COST FOR PUBLIC ART, AS OUTLINED IN THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED. 8. ALL SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 (HORIZ:VERT)WILL BE STABILIZED WITH STONE RIP RAPPING OR SCULPTURED ROCK AND INSTALLED BY APPROVED METHODS AS STATED IN TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE: CHAPTER 27, SECTION 27.9 GRADING. 9. THE ENTIRE PERIMETER LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE INITIAL PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT (PER THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN). REMOVAL OF SIGNIFICANT VEGETATION SHOULD ALSO BE MITIGATED DURING THIS PHASE, WHEN APPLICABLE. 10. PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF ASSURANCES, THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST PROVIDE A LETTER WITH REGISTRANT'S STAMP VERIFYING THE ACTUAL PLANTING HAS BEEN ACCOMPLISHED IN A MANNER TO PRECLUDE OVERCROWDING. FINAL LANDSCAPE &IRRIGATION PLAN BIG HORN COMMERCIAL CENTER TOWN OF ORO VALLEY TUCSON - FLORENCE HIGHWAY ORACLE_ ROAD (pUBu- ----- (sTArE ORACLE. ECT _ - --- - ADOT R/W PROJECT #BP-G31-1-813 DWG.# 0-111-342 s RAMS PASS - - - LOTS 1-86 MP BK. 59, PG. 70 ZONING: T-P GENERAL IRRIGATION NOTES 1. IRRIGATION AND/OR WATERING PLANS SHALL MEET THE MINIMUM STANDARDS OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF IRRIGATION CONSULTANTS. 2. PROPERTY OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM 3. IRRIGATION SYSTEMS CONNECTED TO POTABLE WATER MAINS (PUBLIC OR PRIVATE) SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH BACKFLOW PREVENTERS 4. THE ANNUAL WATER USER FOR A PROJECT SHALL NOT EXCEED THE ANNUAL LANDSCAPE WATER PLAN. 5. IRRIGATION METER READINGS SHALL BE USED TO DETERMINE COMPLIANCE WITH THE LANDSCAPE WATER PLAN. NON-COMPLIANCE IS SUBJECT TO PENALTIES UNDER ORO VALLEY TOWN CODE. 6. METER READINGS SHALL BE TAKEN, AT A MINIMUM, ON AN ANNUAL BASIS. MONTHLY READINGS MAY BE REQUIRED, AT THE DISCRETION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, IN ORDER TO ADDRESS NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE WATER PLAN. 7. AN INITIAL METER READING SHALL BE TAKEN PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY AND RECORDED FOR REFERENCE AS PART OF THE WATER PLAN. 8. IRRIGATION WATER SHALL NOT LEAVE THE LANDSCAPED AREAS AAND FLOW ONTO ROADS, PARKING AREAS OR SIDEWALKS. 9. PROPERTY OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING THE TEMPORARY IRRIGATION SYSTEM AS LONG AS NECESSARY IN ORDER TO TRANSITION PLANTS TO NATURAL SOURCES. ANY PLANT MATERIALS THAT DIE IN TRANSITION, FOR ANY REASON, SHALL BE REPLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SEC. 27.6. EA., MAINTENANCE. r Co Intact Arizona E;11 at least full worklny days before you be�ln exc�avatlon }ram. AR�ZONA ��11. Call 811 or click Arizotta811.com J ACCEPTED BY: INITIAL PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT PLANNING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR OV1 700950 0 60 1 0 SCALE: 1 "= 60' SHEET INDEX L-0 COVER SHEET L-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L-2 IRRIGATION PLAN L-3 LANDSCAPE -IRRIGATION DETAILS LDDDD EG EXISTING GROUND TOE TOE OF BERM, SLOPE ETC. T. O.P. TOP OF PIPE FL SLOPE ETC. FLOWLINE OF SWALE ACP ALUM. CAP IN CONC. LCP LEAD CAPPED PIPE I/E/U INGRESS/EGRESS & UTILITIES FPE FINISHED PAD ELEVATION FPE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION NG NATURAL GROUND INV INVERT A. C AGGREGATED CONCRETE BOT BOTTOM 21.53 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION (AS NOTED) D. F. DRAINAGE FLOW ARROWS DRAINAGE 0 FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT AS NOTED 0 FND. 112" IRON ROD, RLS 29873 41 DISCHARGE POINT v SLOPE INDICATOR - .--2634--_ - EXISTING TOPO CONTOUR 2634 PROPOSED TOPO CONTOUR ORO THIS PROJE'G MW CANYON PAD ORO VALLEY AN �S ::J.�:o�:.: ¢�,U�' U�DMi� PAD 0 yY ORO VALLEY '% L OCA TION MAP �N SCALE. 3"=1 MILE A PORTION OF THE S. W. 114 OF SECTION 5 TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 14 EAST GILA & SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PIMA COUNTY, AZ SCALE: 3"= I MILE PROPERTY BOUNDARY EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY - - - - - - GRADING LIMITS (SEE SHEET 6) ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ZONING BOUNDARY (PER PIMA MAP GUIDE) - - EASEMENT AS NOTED - -- --- STREET CENTERLINE - - 100 YR. FLOOD PLAIN LIMITS (SEE SHEET4) 2630.72 -_ PROP. CONDITION WATER SURFACE ELEV. (SHT 4) ..�_ANNE0F__ PROP. STORM DRAIN PIPE AS NOTED - - E -- - EXISTING UNDER GROUND ELECTRIC - - - W - ---0-- - EXISTING WATER LINE AND VALVE - 1- - S - --� - - EXISTING SEWER LINE AND MANHOLE OHE --c�PP EXISTING OVER HEAD ELECTRIC & POWER POLE X X EXISTING FENCE �- - NEW BARRICADE RAILING Q EXISTING ELECTRIC PEDESTAVTRANSFORMER EXISTING TELEPHONE/CABLE TV EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT NEW AC PAVEMENT GROUTED ROCK RIPRAP KOMHANDPLACED ROCK RIPRAP NEW CONCRETE a a a ° ° EXISTING CONCRETE SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE (SEE SHEET 3) 9 PARKING SPACE COUNTS (SEE SHEET 3) HYDRANT LANDSCAPE BUFFERYARD TABLE BUFFERYARD LOCATION REOUIRED TYPE REQUIRED WIDTH PROPOSED WIDTH PLANTS REOUIRED PER 100, PLANTS PRO\/IDED PER 100, BUFFERYARD LENDTH GROUND TREATMENT WEST B 50, 50, 4-T 5-5 10-A 4-T 10-5 10-A 3q0 DEGORATI\/E ROCK NORTH B 50, 50' 4-T 5-5 10-A 4-T 10-5 10-A 520 DEGORATI\/E ROCK SOUTH NONE 5-T 12-5 O-A 500 DEGORATI\/E ROCK EAST NONE 4-T 5-5 O-A 445 DEGORATI\/E ROCK DATE OWNERS/DEVELOPER BIG HORN COMMERCE CENTER, LLC 6650 N. ORACLE ROAD, SUITE 100 TUCSON, ARIZONA 85704 ATTN: MR. ROBERT SOLFISBERG TEL. (520) 742-7887 bob@jbsarizona.com JOHN HUCKO - LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 5236 N. STONEHOUSE PL. TUCSON, ARIZONA 85750 P: (520) 400.8529 E: jhucko789@comcast.net PROJECT NO: 16-18 i COVER SHEET ..................... OV1700950 REFERENCE NO. Co12-83-08, P1299-056 OV12-05-23, G1602254 G904-09A, OV911-001 OV1501549 FINAL LANDSCAPE & IRRGATION PLAN BIG HORN COMMERCE CENTER HN R. 11278 N. ORACLE ROAD, ORO VALLEY AZ. 85737 ucKO A PORTION OF SW 4 OF SECTION 5 TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH,RANGE 14 EAST GILA & AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA EXPIRES 3/31/2018 SCALE: DESIGNED BY: JH REVI CONTOUR INTERVAL: DRAWN BY: pL REVI 2-18 --REV SHEET L-0 1 OF 4 D BY: JH � Fi...DREi (PUBLIC) HIGHWAY TUCSON DAD � -- - --- - -- -- - ----- ADOT P/w PRVJ�C —s— — — — —s CN C� `N COS; N Z — —w— — SCAJ-E: I" = 50'-0" LOTS 1-86 IRRIGATION CONTROL SCHEDULE P BBC. 591 PG. 70 ZONING; T— P INITIAL PLANT I NO AND ESTABLISHMENT: 2 HRS - 4 TIMES A NEEK YEARS I - 2 - 5 HRS. - 5 TIMES A NEEK YEARS 5 - 5 - 4 HRS - 2 TIMES A NEEK YEARS 5 PLUS - AS NEEDED NOTE: ALL TIMES SHALL BE SEASONAL ADJUSTED A MINIMUM OF 4 TIMES A YEAR Valves DI and D2 Initial Phase FULL SITE DEVELOPMENT LANDSCAPE WATER PLAN Winter Spring Summer Monsoon Winter Mont 1 2 5 4 5 6 7 8 q 10 11 12 ?�i? 1- : -Continue to increase irrigation water use 05 needed as plants mature up to, but not exceeding, 100% A-DAR value by end of year. ( average monthly water use = 56,584Ca1./Month TOTAL (100% ADAR=456,608 Oal./Year) 2500 50000 - j50000 1 56000 1 45000 45000 1 56000 I 56000 I 50000T 50000 50000 25000 EAR 4: Begin gradually decreasing irrigation to buffer, median, and RON areas in order to reach zero irrigation in those areas by end of year 5. (To reach 75% ADNR by end of year, average monthlymorthly water use = 27,250 Cal. Total (75% ADAR = 527,000 Oa l/ ear 2000 25000 28000 28000 52000 52000 50000 50000 28000 25000 2500 20000 EAR 5: Continue decreasing irrigation to buffer and RON areas. By end of year 5, irrigation to buffer and RON areas must be zero, and total amount of water used at site must meet 50% of ADAR rraturitul value. ( 50% ADAR=101,000 Oal./ ear 8,416 O/M -1 6000 8000 8000 10000 12000 12000 12000 10000 10000 T 8000 6000 1 6000 IRRIGATION NOTES IRRIGATION LEGEND I. Plan is schematic only. All Symbol Manufacturer Description mainlines, valves, etc. shall be placed within planting areas © Noter Meter Irrigation F.O.0 wherever possible. stem shall e Febco 4" Reduced Pressure Backflow 2. The entire irrigation s Lai y Preventer, Febco 525Y w/ 50ti5y all code requirements and be installed as per Ouarclshock Security Enclosure manufacturers' s eccations. CL Ci CL C p © Hunter XC-6- 6 Station 120VAC Outdoor Controller - Noll Mount -- 5. Contractor shall sleeve all Final development - connect all valves Q mainlines (2 or less), valve wires and laterals under all paved ® Ba 11 Va Ive Brass ball va Ive - 5/4" sufaces and walls extendin „ Q g Hunter ICZ - 101 -I Control Zone Kit with NODE sleeves I foot from edge of 100 Battery Operated Controller - Initial C�_ paved surface, or wa I I . Ma in I ine5 Development Phase Valves DI and D2 greater than 2 inches in diameter � shall be direct buried. Sch 40 PVG I" Mainline 4. Contractor shall coordinate installation of drip irrigation lines Sch 40 FVC 2"-4" Sleeve. prior to installation of plant material with the Owner's SCH 40 PVC Lateral line - size as shown. � Representative. — — — — p Rain Bird I�� Sch. 40 FVC Drip Irrigation Lateral i w 5. Trees to be irrigated by Line w/ Rain Bug XBT-20-6 Multi -outlet multi -outlet emitters. Shrubs and Emitter @ 2 OPH each Outlet and i = groundcover to be irrigated by XBT-20 single -outlet Emitter @ 2 OPH zsingle -outlet emitters. w/ RBT-220\/ Distribution Tubing. l Ln 6. Contractor shall apply for i U � 4__ Reduced Pressure Bockflow Lo5co AP-100 - 5/4" Hose End Flush Gap. �i o Preventer permit from Backf low i Ott m Prevention Department. VAL\/E 7. Not less than IDENTIFIER xx quarterIyinspections and I" x — — M-- seasonal maintenence of irrigation systems are required. SIZE CPM OWNERS/DEVELOPER BIG HORN COMMERCE CENTER, LLC 6650 N. ORACLE ROAD, SUITE 100 TUCSON, ARIZONA 85704 ATTN: MR. ROBERT SOLFISBERG TEL. (520) 742-7887 bob@jbsarizona.com JOHN HUCKO - LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 5236 N. STONEHOUSE PL. TUCSON, ARIZONA 85750 P: (520) 400.8529 E: jhucko789@comcast.net PROJECT NO: 16-18 - - — Initial development Irrigation Area OV 1700950 REFERENCE NO. Co12-83-08, P1299-056 OV12-05-23, G1602254 G904-09A, OV911-001 OV1501549 IRRIGATION PLAN SHEET BIG HORN COMMERCE CENTER L-2 -�.,. 11278 N. ORACLE ROAD, ORO VALLEY AZ. 85737 A PORTION OF SW a OF SECTION 5 TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH,RANGE 14 EAST GILA & AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA 3 OF 4 SCALE: I" = 30'-0" DESIGNED BY: JH REVIEWED BY: JH CONTOUR INTERVAL: WA DRAWN BY: DL REVISED: Finish Grade Plastic Jumbo Valve Box w/ Locking Lid. Color Tan Pressure Regulating Basket Filter I" Electric Remote Control Valve. Sch 60 PVC Union. Ball Valve. (Same size as ROV). Sch &0 PVC Nipple. Sch 60 PVC Street Ell (typ). Sch 60 PVC Nipple from Tee. Brick as necessary (4 min). 5/4" Grovel Sump o 12" depth. PVC Lateral. n PVC Mainline. ` Sch 60 PVC SxSxT Reducing Tee. NOTES: Apply Recto Seal 05 or Teflon Tape to all pipe joints 3 thread corrections, or approved equal. Compact soil around piping and valve box to some density as undisturbed soil. Refer to Specifications for piping material. Ei�OTE CONTROL SAL\/E W I TH FILTER _ DR I F NTS necessary Finish Grade Excavated Cover Material (See Notes) Spray Head and Drip Emitter Lateral Spray Rotor Lateral LATERAL TRENCH Finish Grade Excavated Cover Material (See Notes) Tracer Ribbon (See Notes) Valve wires Irrigation Mainline Bedding Material (See Notes) MAINLINE TRENCH NOTIM All mainlines to be Installed in accordance with manufacturer's Specifications. All electrical wire connections to valves and splices to be Installed within a valve box and made with Pan-tite waterproof connectors, or approved equal. Bundle and tape wiring at 10 foot Intervals. Valve wires to be installed within mainline tronch wherever possible. Bedding material shall be 1/4" minus sand, and shall be 5 Inches below mainline and 5 inches above mainline. Excavated cover material shall be free from debris and rocks 1/2 Inch or greater. Install Tracer Ribbon In all mainline trenches Including quick coupler lines. (See Specifications). TF,ENC,HIN0 DETAIL Concrete Sidewalk or Curb Decomposed Granite I" Reveal max. See Planting Plan for depth. c15% Compacted Subgrade _�SCREENEF_) ROCX / DE�OiF05ED GFAN I TE — 24" minimum from any paved surface „ Wrap #12 GA. Galvanized Wire around each end of sleeve (10 wraps min) and extend to surface as locator. Finished Grade. Pavement/Walkway (typ) Select Backfill within 5" of Sleeve. (typ) See Note below. L7 5chAO PVC, Pipe Sleeve, size as Noted. NOTE: Backfill within 5" of sleeve shall be free of rocks and stones larger than 1/2" Via. If rock carrot be removed from excavated soil, provide clean sand bedding. f= I f=F SLEEK I NO NT5 Ell ' r %�"III�III�II—IIII�I�IIIIII�II�III'`,_` n� loll OUR — -- 6alvanized Street Ell (typ) Guard Shack Backflow Unit Enclosure I. (Install as per Manufacturer's Specifications) - Tan - Reduced Pressure Backf low Assembly. (Refer to Irrigation Legend for Manufacturer 4 Size). -- 6alvanized Nipple (typ) - - 6alvanized Street Ell (typ) - Wilkins PSBR-0'75 "Y" Strainer w/ 100 Mesh Screen 4 Hose Bib, or approved equa I . - Finish Grade ---- Concrete 51ob Foundation to accommodate security box. Protect pipe through slab with IOmm Poly -wrap tape. Compacted Subgrade PVC Irrigation Mainline - - Mainline from Water Source. NOTES: Supply keyed padlock, Master Lock Model "57 w/ two keys, or approved equal, for locking security enclosure. Finish Grade Decomposed Granite if applicable. Rootba I I Planting Pit Size: 5 601 - 24" dia. I Gal - 12" dia. Backfill Mix per cubic yard: Two Parts Site Soil One Part Organic Mulch 5 lbs. Sulfur 20-10-5 Agriform Tablets per Manufacturer's recommendations. NOTE: Plant pit to be to the depth of the rootboll, typical. 5HUE3 PLANTI NO NTS Contact Arirona 81. at least two lull , workln� days before you bepin excavatlon Val►/�i�, AR ZaNA :1�1. Call 81t or click Arizona811.com J Subgrade DETAIL PLAN OF HOSE AND WIRE 2" Diameter Pressure Treated 10' min. Lodge Pole Pine Tree Stake. 12 ga. Galvanized Wire Inside 5/4" dia. Flexible Rubber Hose 0 6" dia. circle. Staple wire to each stake. (2 wires/tree). 6' X 5" Deep Basin (typical) Finish Grade Decomposed Granite if applicable. Rootba I I Planting Pit Size: 15 601 - 56" dia. 24" Box - 45" dia. 56" Box - 60" dia. 48" Box - '72" dia. Depth of pit to be depth of rootboll. Backfill Mix per cubic yard: Two Parts Site Soil One Part Organic Mulch 5 lbs. Sulfur 20-10-5 Agriform Tablets per Manufacturer's recommendations. "I" Rubber Hose ® 6" dia. m Trunk ga. holy. Wire. Staple to Stake. 2" dia. Tree Stake NOTE: See Specifications for application of FORROMEC AC Liquid Iron to all trees. Plant pit to be to the depth of the rootbail, typical. SINGLE TFL)N< TF,,E-E FLANTIN0 NTS _ Multi -Outlet Emitter. 5/4" Class 200 PVC 3' (typ TREE Emitter Distribution Tubing Location (typ). Tree Trunk. - Tree Canopy (Plan View). Vinyl Distribution Tubing. Multi -Outlet Emitter Glass 200 PVC - Vinyl Distribution Tubing. Tubing Location (typ). Shrub or 6roundcover Center. 6" (typ: / - - - Dist. Tubing to other Plants. (typ) _ 9 yp SHRUB OR 6ROUNDCOVER NOTES: Refer to Irrigation Key for Manufacturer. IM I TTER FLACEMENT NTS OWNERS/DEVELOPER BIG HORN COMMERCE CENTER, LLC 6650 N. ORACLE ROAD, SUITE 100 TUCSON, ARIZONA 85704 ATTN: MR. ROBERT SOLFISBERG TEL. (520) 742-7887 bob@jbsarizona.com OV1700950 REFERENCE NO. Co12-83-08, P1299-056 OV12-05-23, G1602254 G904-09A, OV911-001 OV1501549 FINAL NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLAN GENERAL SITE NOTES 1. THE GROSS AREA OF THE DEVELOPMENT SITE IS 3.259 ACRES. NET BUILDING AREA = 27,905 SF. 2. ZONING C-1 3. BUILDING GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE = 29,025 SF.T 3. PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS C-1 COMMERCIAL DISTRICT FLOOR AREA RATIO - .2045 OPEN SPACE = 33.3% TOTAL GROSS FLOOR AREA <.25 NET LOT AREA. BUILDING HEIGHT = 25' TOTAL OPEN SPACE PROVIDED - 47,226 SF. SITE RESOURCE INVENTORY BIG HORN COMMERCIAL CENTER C0nt41.ct Arizona II 11 at least two full , worklny days betcrrc you tiepin excavation Call 811 0r click Arizona811.com I TOWN OF ORO VALLEY OV1 700950 VXO VALLEY V J STEAM PUMP RANCH , "R*S CANYON PAO ORO VALLEY ttau9pfvvw PAP ORO VALLEY 1% LOCATION MAP N SCALE: 3 =1 MILE A PORTION OF THE S. W. 1/4 OF SECTION 5 TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 14 EAST GILA & SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PIMA COUNTY, AZ SCALE: 3 "= I MILE G SHEET INDEX 0 60 1 0 lH SCALE: 1 "=60' LEGEND GEND EG EXISTING GROUND TOE T. 0. P. FL ACP LCP 1/E/U FPE FPE NG INV A. C — 2634--._ — 2634 ACCEPTED BY: PLANNING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR TOE OF BERM, SLOPE ETC. TOP OF PIPE SLOPE ETC. FLOWLINE OF SWALE ALUM. CAP IN CONC. LEAD CAPPED PIPE INGRESS/EGRESS & UTILITIES FINISHED PAD ELEVATION FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION NATURAL GROUND INVERT AGGREGATED CONCRETE BOTTOM PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION (AS NOTED) DRAINAGE FLOW ARROWS DRAINAGE FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT AS NOTED FND. 1/2" IRON ROD, RLS 29873 DISCHARGE POINT SLOPE INDICATOR EXISTING TOPO CONTOUR PROPOSED TOPO CONTOUR DATE PROPERTY BOUNDARY — — EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY — — GRADING LIMITS (SEE SHEET 6) ■ ■ ■ ■ ■� ■ ZONING BOUNDARY (PER PIMA MAP GUIDE) EASEMENT AS NOTED -- - -- - STREET CENTERLINE 100 YR. FLOOD PLAIN LIMITS (SEE SHEET4) 2630.72 PROP. CONDITION WATER SURFACE ELEV. (SHT 4) PROP. STORM DRAIN PIPE AS NOTED — E — — EXISTING UNDER GROUND ELECTRIC — — — w — —0— — EXISTING WATER LINE AND VALVE —4— — S — — EXISTING SEWER LINE AND MANHOLE OHE EXISTING OVER HEAD ELECTRIC & POWER POLE X X EXISTING FENCE a- NEW BARRICADE RAILING ® EXISTING ELECTRIC PEDESTAL/TRANSFORMER 0 EXISTING TELEPHONE/CABLE TV EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT OWNERS/DEVELOPER BIG HORN COMMERCE CENTER, LLC 6650 N. ORACLE ROAD, SUITE 100 TUCSON, ARIZONA 85704 ATTN: MR. ROBERT SOLFISBERG TEL. (520) 742-7887 bob@jbsarizona.com NEW AC PAVEMENT GROUTED ROCK RIPRAP HANDPLACED ROCK RIPRAP NEW CONCRETE EXISTING CONCRETE SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE (SEE SHEET 3) PARKING SPACE COUNTS (SEE SHEET 3) HYDRANT NP-0 COVER SHEET NP-1 NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLAN NP-2 NATIVE PLANT INVENTORY SHEETS OWNER/DEVELOPER: BIG HORN COMMERCE CENTER, LLC 6650 N. ORACLE ROAD, SUITE 100 TUCSON, AZ 85704 ATTN: MR. ROBERT SOLFISBURG TEL. (520) 742-7887 FAX (520) 742-3343 COVER SHEET SCALE. 3 "=1 MILE Te FEB 0 7 00 7'pj OV1700950 REFERENCE NO. Co12-83-08, P1299-056 OV12-05-23, G1602254 G904-09A, OV911-001 OV1501549 NFFO LEOEND NATIVE PLANT FRE5ERVAT I ON MOTES Native Plant Inventor .� ID# Cenus and Species T_ X K 0 Form and Health, 1-5, low -high A } _ O LO z i Comments: 1 5V Prosopis velutina 24'x14' 24" 2 2 M L PIP 2 Prosopis velutina 12'x12' 10" 4 5 M M T05 3 5V Prosopis velutina 15'X15' 16": 3 5 Drought stressed -poor form M L RF5 4 5V Prosopis velutina I5'X15' 12" 2 2 Drought stressed - oor form L L RF5 5 Prosopis velutina 10'XIO' 15 5 5 M M RFS 6 Chilo sis linearis 6'x8' 6" 2 2 L L RF5 Chilopsis linearis 5'x15, 12" 2 2 L L RF5 8 Prosopis velutina 8'x8' 6" 4 4 M M T05 cl Oercidium floridum 6'x8' 6" 5 5 Adjacent to pavement edge L L RF5 10 Acacia greggli 14'X14' 8" 5 3 M IM I Tog 11 Prosopis velutina 10'xl0' 11" 1 3 3 M M T05 12 SV Prosopis velutina 14'xl4' 16" 5 3 Heavul Mistie Toe L M RF5 15 Prosopis velutina 101XIO' 8" 5 5 M M RFS 14 Acacia greegil 6x6' 6" 2 3 L M RF5 15 Acacia re i i 6'X6' 6" 5 5 M L RF5 16 51/ Prosopis velutina 12'X12' 14" 2 5 Drought stressed -poor form L L RFS 17 Acacia greggi 12'X14' 7" 3 5 M M RF5 18 5V Prosopis velutina 24'X20' la" 2 2 Heavy Mistle Toe L L RFS 1'1 5V Proso is velutina 2C'X20' 16" 2 3 Droucjht stressed -poor f orm L L RFS 205V Prosopis velutina 12'x20' 1(0" 2 5 Poor form, Poor health L M RFS 21 Acacia greggii 7'x7' 1511 5 5 M M T05 22 5 Prosopis velutina 10"X10' 16" 2 2 Poor form L M RF5 23 S Prosopis velutina 12'X12' 14,, 5 5 Poor form M M RF5 24 5V Prosopis velutina 26'X28' 50" 2 2 Poor form, Poor health M L RF5 25 Acacia greggii q'X10' loll 3 5 M M T05 26 Acacia greggii l8'X18' 50" 3 5 M L RF5 27 Prosopis velutina ION 10' 12" 4 4 Ni M RF5 28 5 Proso is velutina 151X15' 12" 2 2 Poor form, Poor health L L RFS, 2cl SV Prosopis velutina 25'X25' 25" 2 2 Poor form, Poor health L L RF5 50 5 Prosopis velutina 40'X24 42" 5 3 To Large to move, old grwot M L RFS 31 Prosopis velutina IO'X10' 10" 4 4 M M T05 Tr-MFORAR`r NURSERY Native Plant Inventory I D# i5enus and Species c T X fl- — 0 Form and Health, 1-5, low -high < IO T_ G_omments : -! 6 5 X �- 6 Q IL LL 52 Cercidium floridum 8'x8' (0 11 5 5 M M PIP 55 Prosopis velutina 10'xl0' 5 5 5 Multi - HYBRID M M PIP 54 Prosopis velutina q'Xq' 6" 4 4 M M T05 35 S Cercidium floridum 5,x8' 20" 2 2 side of rock berm M M PIP 36 Cercidium floridum 12'xl4' 10" 5 5 side of rock berm M L PIP 37 Prosopis velutina 12'xl2' 10" 4 4 Multi M M PIP 38 Oercidium floridum 10'xl0' 8" 5 5 Multi -close to adjacent tree M M RFS 5cl Prosopis velutina 12'xl2' 6" 2 5 M M T05 40 5 Cercidium floridum 40'x30' 20 2 2 L L PIP 41 1 Prosopis velutina 10'x2O' 8" 2 1 2 1 IL L RFS 42 Cercidium floridum 4'xlO' 3" 1 1 L L RFS 43 Cercidium floridum 12'x12' 6" 5 3 M M T05 44 Prosopis velutina 5'x5' 3" 4 4 M M T05 45 Prosopis velutina l0'x10' 8" 4 4 M M T05 46 Prosopis velutina 10'xl2' 24" 5 5 M M T05 47 5V Prosopis velutina 20'x22' la" 5 5 Poor Poor health M L RFS 48 Prosopis velutina 10'xl0' 8" 3 3 -form, M L RFS 4q Proso pis velutina 12'x 12' 6" 1 2 L L RF5 50 Prosopis velutina 14'xl4' 10" 5 2 M M T05 51 Proso is velutina 10'xl6' loll 4 4 M M RF5 52 Cercidium floridum 10'xl0' 6" 5 5 L L RFS 55 Proso is velutina 12'xl2' (0 11 3 5 M M T05 54 Cercidium floridum 16'xl2' foil I I L L PM 55 Cercidium floridum 10'xl6 12 2 5 L L RF5 56 Cercidium floridum Vx8' g" 4 5 M M TOS 5-7 Cercidium f loridum 6'x6' 8 2 3 Deadwood L M RJ 5,5 5V Cercidium floridum 12'xl0' 12" 2 5 Poor form, Poor health L L RF5 5q Prosopis veiutino 16'xl6" loll 3 3 Multi M M RFS 60 Prosopis velutina IO'x 12' 10" 5 5 Double trunk M L RF5 61 Oercidium floridum 14'x10' all 5 5 Side of Berm H L RF5 62 5 Cercidium floridum 12'x10' 1411 2 5 Poor form, Poor health L L RX_q 1. A temporary nursery is not required for this project. However, trees proposed to be transplanted will be relocated to their final planting location. Protective fencing will be installed to protect the transplanted trees. The transplanted trees will be hand -watered un till the permanent irrigation system is installed to irrigate the required landscape bufferyords. Trees shall be fertilized to ensure health and tronsplonting. Cont-aet Arizona 611 at least two Tull worklnA days 1—M you begin excavatdon f�. AR�ZOO NA :>111. Call 811 o.r click WATI,izoraa811.com ON I TF MON I TOR I N Dative Plant Inventory Genus and Species Form and Health, -! ? 1-5, low -high 3 z c CL - -- s 6 0) t� QL tY OID# 0 IO T_ Comments: } T_X K 63 Oercidium floridum 8'x10' 8" 2 5 L L RF5 64 Cercidium floridum 6'x10' 6" 2 5 L L RF5 65 5V Oercidium floridum 14'xl4' 15" 5 5 Poor form, Poor health M L RFS 66 5 Oercidium floridum 0'xl2' 12" 5 5 Poor form, Poor health M L RFS 67 Cercidium floridum 12'x0' 8" 2 5 L L RF5 68 Cerciclium floridum 12'xl6' q" 5 3 M M TOg 6q Cercidium floridum 61xl0' 6" 2 2 Side of Berm L M RF5 70 Prosopis velutina 12'xl4' 5" 4 4 M M T05 71 Prosopis velutina 8'x8' 6" 5 3 M M RFS 72 Prosopis velutina 10'xl0' 7" 5 5 Side of Berm L M RFS 75 Prosopis velutina IO'x14' 6" 5 3 M M R1=5 74 Cercidium floridum 10'xl0' 6" 5 3 M M T05 75 Prosopis velutina 8'X8' 5" 5 5 M M T05 76 Proso is velutina 8'x8' 6" 3 3 M M TO5 77 Prosopis velutina 10'xl0' 6" 3 5 M M T05 78 Prosopis velutina 8'x8' 5" 5 5 M M TOS 7cl Acacia grq53eil 8'X8' 10" 5 5 M L RFS 50 Cercidium f loridum I O'x20' 10" 2 2 L L RFS 81 Prosopis velutina 20'X20' x" I I DEAD L L RF5 82 Acacia greeeii 6'x6' 6" 2 2 L M RFS 83 Prosopis velutina 10'xl0' 8" 5 3 M M T05 84 Acacia !9rcepil Vx8' 6" 5 2 M L RF5 85 Acacia preegii 8'x8' 6" 5 2 M L RF5 86 Prosopis velutina 15'xl5' 8" 3 2 M M RF5 87 Acacia greggii 8'x8' 611 3 2 side of berm M M RF5 88 Acacia preppil 15'xl5' 6" 5 3 side of berm M M RFS 8q N/A cf0 Prosopis velutina 10'xlO' 8" 4 4 - M M T05 ql 5V Oercidium floridum 20N20' 16' 3 3 Drought stressed -poor form Poor form, Poor health M M RFS `�2 S Proso is velutina '' 20X20 16" 2 2 L L RF5 q3 Cercidium floridum 16'X18' loll 3 3 H M _ RF5 q4 Prosopis velutina 20'X20' 10 3 5 L L L M RFS RFS q5 5V Oercidium floridum 16'X18' 12" 3 3 Grossed Trunks I. Site monitoring of all aspects of site clearing, grading, plant protection and preservation shall be provided during project construction at the expense of the Owner/Developer and at one year after final inspection, to ensure the protection of preserved plants and set aside areas. Monitoring shall be performed by an individual qualified in natural resource identification and protection, approved by the Town of Oro Valley. 2. The monitor shall provide periodic progress reports to the Owner outlining the status of work accomplished and any problems encountered. 3. The Town of Oro Valley shall receive a copy of these reports for the project file. 4. The assigned monitor for this project is T.B.D. OWNERS/DEVELOPER BIG HORN COMMERCE CENTER, LLC 6650 N. ORACLE ROAD, SUITE 100 TUCSON, ARIZONA 85704 ATTN: MR. ROBERT SOLFISBERG TEL. (520) 742-7887 bob@jbsarizona.com PLANT PROTECTION DURING DEVELOPMENT PROTECTIVE FENCING AND BARRICADES I. Fencing is required during construction for individual Protected Native Plants to be preserved in place. The area to be fenced shall be beyond the "drip -line" of vegetation by one-half (1/2) the distance of the "drip -line" radius. Four foot (4) height orange Tensor fencing shall be erected. 2. The purpose of the fencing is to provide protection against ground disturbance and damage from the impacts of construction activity and the development process. Grading will not encroach inside the fenced areas. The property owner will maintain this "no disturbance" area from which no Native plants will be removed. Fencing so erected will extend beyond the drip line of vegetation inside grading areas. 3. Preserved -in -place and replacement Native plants will be protected during the development process by fencing erected in conformance with the requirements of this paragraph. Fencing and barricades required will remain in place throughout the construction and development process. 51 GN I F I CANT VEOt=TATION M I T I C AT I ON Significant Vegetation: SV Removal of 21 Significant Trees = Total amount on site: 6725 S.F. Total amount Disturbed: 5870 S.F Total Percentage Disturbed: a&% Trees - 2:1 ratio = 42 trees required 50% 56" Box = 21 trees 50% 48" Box + 21 trees Under -story Plants = 5 plants for each mitigated tree = 105 mitigation plants required OV1700950 REFERENCE NO. Co12-83-08, P1299-056 OV12-05-23, G1602254 G904-09A, OV911-001 OV1501549 z z GENERAL NOTES 0 z 1. GROSS AREA OF DEVELOPMENT IS 3.259 ACRES NET BUILDING AREA = 27, 905.42 SF. 2. ZONING C-1 3. BUILDING GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE = 29,025 SF. 4. PARKING REQUIREMENTS, REFER TO SHEET 3 OF 7 FOR CA L CS RESTAURANT = 6,000 SF1100 = 60 GENERAL RETAIL = 22,985 SF1250 = 91.94 TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED = 152 SPACES z TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED = 152 SPACES ON SITE STANDARD PARKING SPACES MEASURE 9' X 20'. MIN. COMPACT PARKING SPACES MEASURE 8' X 16'. o HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACE MEASURE 13' X 20' FOR ONE SPACE, 21 ' X 20' FOR TWO ADJACENT PARKING SPACES. PARKING SPACES WILL NOT ENCROACH UPON A REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFERYARD. PARKING SPACE ENCROACHING UPON A SIDEWALK WILL HAVE A MINIMUM 41CLEARANCE BETWEEN THE OVERHANG AND THE END OF THE SIDEWALK FOR PEDESTRIANS. J 5. PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS C-1 COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. m FLOOR AREA RATIO = .2045 o - OPEN SPACE = 33.30% - TOTAL GROSS FLOOR AREA < .25 NET LOT AREA BUILDING VOLUME RATIO J - OPEN SPACE = 47,226 SF. = 33.30% NET LOT AREA - AGGREGATE AREA OF THE BUILDINGS = 20.45% NET LOT AREA - THE GROSS FLOOR AREA OF ANY ONE STRUCTURE DOES NOT EXCEED 15,000 SF. z BUILDING HEIGHT = 25 FT. ct Lj TOTAL OPEN SPACE PROVIDED = 47,226 SF. z W 6. BASIS OF BEARINGS: THE BEARING OF S 47' 29' 52' E ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF RAMS FIELD PASS cr ROAD, AS SHOWN IN ALTA SURVEY BY DAVID L. PUTT, RLS 13019, ENTITLED "ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY, PORTIONS OF SECTIONS 5 & 8, T125, R14E, J 6&5RM, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA", DATED JULY 25, 2002. z 7. BASIS OF ELEVATION: w A 3' ALUMINUM DISK ON EAST BARRIER WALL APPROXIMATELY 2.91ABOVE z ROADWAY AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE ORACLE ROAD BRIDGE OVER THE CANYON DEL ORO WASH, PIMA COUNTY BENCHMARK (NAVD 88) ELEVATION = 2652.09 FEET. 8. NOTE: THE BOUNDARY AS SHOWN WAS RE-ESTABLISHED USING THE ALTA m SURVEY COMPLETED BY DAVID PUTT, RLS 13019, DATED JULY 23, 2002, AND Q CONDITION OF TITLE AMENDMENT #40003022- T BY FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE AGENCY, WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF JANUARY 27, 2004. 9. DEVELOPER WILL COVENANT TO HOLD TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, HARMLESS IN THE EVENT OF FLOODING. 10. DRAINING WILL NOT BE ALTERED, DISTURBED OR CONSTRUCTED WITHOUT THE o APPROVAL OF THE ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL. 11. PROPERTY IS ASSOCIATION WILL BE FORMED TO ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY FOR w MAINTENANCE, CONTROL, SAFETY AND LIABILITY OF PRIVATE DRAINAGE WAYS, DRAINAGE EASEMENTS AND COMMON AREAS. w 12. FINAL SITE PLANS AND IMPROVEMENTS MUST BE APPROVED FOR COMMERCIAL LOTS OR PADS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY PERMITS BY THE TOWN ENGINEER AND/OR BUILDING OFFICIAL. z 13. ANY RELOCATION, MODIFICATION, ETC. OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND/OR PUBLIC w IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED BY THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL BE AT NO EXPENSE TO o THE PUBLIC. 14. ON -SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS. THE LOCATION AND METHOD ON CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT AT THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL OF PLUMBING OR BUILDING PLANS. Ln 15. ANY WASTEWATER DISCHARGED INTO THE PUBLIC SANITARY SEWERAGE SYSTEM SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE INDUSTRIAL WASTE ORDINANCE (PIMA �o COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 1991-140, AS AMENDED). 16. FLOODPLAINS ARE NOT TO BE ALTERED OR FILLED. �o 17. THE WATER COMPANY THAT WILL SERVICE THIS DEVELOPMENT IS METROPOLITAN W DOMESTIC WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT. J U 18. ASSESSORS TAX PARCEL IS # 220-04-010M & # 220-04-010J (PORTION) Q 19. NO LIGHT POLES SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG THE EASTERN PARKING BAY AGAINST THE RESIDENTIAL. GROUND LIGHTING TO BE PROVIDED 0 20. ALL TRASH ENCLOSURES AND LOADING ZONES TO BE COMPLETELY SCREENED FROM THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL USES. � o 21. APPROVED IMPROVED PLANS AND APPROVED ASSURANCES WILL BE REQUIRED " Q PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS. 22. THE PROPERTY OWNER, HIS SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS AGREE TO 1) KEEP ALL z REQUIRED LANDSCAPED AREAS MAINTAINED IN A WEED FREE, TRASH FREE CONDITION, 2) REPLACE ANY DEAD PLANT MATERIALS WITHIN 90 DAYS, AND 3) MAINTAIN THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IN PROPER WORKING ORDER. 23. THE APPROVAL OF THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN SHALL BE EFFECTIVE FOR TWO YEARS AFTER THE DATE OF APPROVAL. o 24. DESIGN SPEED DOES NOT APPLY ON SITE. RAMS FIELD PASS DESIGN VEHICLE IS 50-30, MINIMUM DESIGN SPEED OF 15 MPH. 25. MATERIALS WITHIN SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLES MUST BE PLACED SO AS NOT TO 4 INTERFERE WITH A VISIBILITY PLANE DESCRIBED BY TWO HORIZONTAL LINES LOCATED THIRTY (30) INCHES AND SEVENTY TWO (72) INCHES ABOVE FINISHED GRADE OF THE ROADWAY SURFACE. 26. NOTIFY BLUE STAKE 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION TO ESTABLISH THE EXISTING NATURAL GAS FACILITIES LOCATED IN ADJACENT ROW. 27. FIRE HYDRANTS CONNECTED TO AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY OF 1,500 SPM FOR FIRE PROTECTION, EITHER TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT, SHALL BE INSTALLED AND IN SERVICE PRIOR TO COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS DELIVERY TO THE SITE, TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION OFFICE TRAILERS ARE CONSIDERED COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS. 28. APPROVED FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS SHALL BE INSTALLED AND IN SERVICE PRIOR TO COMBUSTIBLE MATERIAL DELIVERY TO SITE. oz 29. TEMPORARY STREET SIGNS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT EA. STREET INTERSECTION WHEN CONSTRUCTION OF NEW ROADWAYS ALLOWS PASSAGE OF VEHICLES. ALL T STRUCTURES UNDER CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED WITH AN o APPROVED ADDRESS. z 30. THE DEVELOPER WILL CONTACT THE LISPS ORO VALLEY BRANCH TO z COORDINATE THE PLACEMENT OF THE MAILBOX(ES) AND OBTAIN THE NECESSARY APPROVALS. o 31. THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE 0 EXISTING AND 130 PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.0245 (EX) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE z 13.20.045(E). 32. A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. FINAL SITE PLAN BIG HORN COMMERCE CENTER STEAM PUMP VILLAGE PIS. e MP PIS. 64 PG. 95 ZONING: PAD SW COR SEC 5 ACP MKD. "USDA" S. W. CDR. SEC. 8 APPROVALS: ORO VALLEY TOWN CLERK ORO VALLEY TOWN ENGINEER ORO VALLEY PLANNING & ZONING ADMINISTRATOR ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY DIRECTOR 33. THE OWNER WILL ALLOCATE 1% OF THE CONSTRUCTION COST FOR PUBLIC ART, AS OUTLINED IN ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED. 34. PROHIBI TED USES. - KENNELS FOR BOARDING - AUTOMOBILE PARTS STORE - GROCERY STORE - HARDWARE STORE - CLINIC WITH URGENT CARE FACILITY - FUNERAL CHAPEL - MOTEL OR HOTEL - THEA TER - CONVENIENCE USE, FAST FOOD - CAR WASHES - INDOOR RECREA TION - AUTO DETAILING 35. AN IN -LIEU FEE SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR A CONCRETE SIDEWALK ALONG ORACLE ROAD, SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY THE TOWN ENGINEER AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING ADMINI STRA TOR. 36. PROVIDE SECURITY BARRIERS FOR THE DETENTION BASINS PER PCDO T 36.2 BASIN REQUIREMENTS. 37. ROOF TOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SCREENED. ov PHASE III "G. 33 ,,- DA TE SITE PLAN ------ OWNER DEVELOPER: DATE BIG HORN COMMERCE CENTER, LLC 6650 N. ORACLE ROAD, SUITE 100 DATE TUCSON, AZ 85704 ROBERT SOLFISBURG (520) 742-7887 DA TE FAX (520) 742-3343 L EGA L DESCRIPTION 00�1 N 0 60 1 0 SCALE: 1 "=60' �MSNCANYON BK. 48 PG. 87 ONING: PAD FND, 2" BCSM MARKED "RLS 26058" PER RAMS CANYON \� BK. 48, PG, 87 N4° 13' 1\"E-- 40.57'\ SHEET INDEX: 1............ COVER SHEET & GENERAL NOTES 2............ NOTES & DEMOLITION PLAN 3............ SITE AND UTILITY PLAN 4............ FINAL GRADING & PAVING PLAN 5............ SECTIONS AND DETAILS 6............ STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN PARCELS 220-04-010M & A PORTION OF 220-04-010J A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 14 EAST, GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 5, BEING A FOUND 2-INCH ALUMINUM CAPPED PIPE, THENCE S 891551211E, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 5, A DISTANCE OF 890.53 FEET TO THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ORACLE ROAD (TUCSON-FLORENCE HIGHWAY), BEING A POINT ON A CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST, WITH A RADIAL BEARING WHICH BEARS N 511091521 W; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE, TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 3919.72 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 4' 54' 58' FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 336.52 FEET TO A FOUND NAIL, TAGGED "RLS 34551 ; BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE N 41' 50' 42' W, A DISTANCE OF 6.33 FEET TO A SET 'PK"NAIL AND WASHER, TAGGED "RLS 29875'; BEING ON SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ORACLE ROAD AND A POINT ON A CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST, WITH A RADIAL BEARING WHICH BEARS N 47' 10' 53' W; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE AND RIGHT-OF-WAY, TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 3969.72 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 5' 54' 54' FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 409.81 FEET TO A SET 112-INCH REEBAR, TAGGED "RLS 29875 THENCE S 48105' 11'E, A DISTANCE OF 367.48 FEET TO A SET 112-INCH REEBAR, TAGGED "RLS 29875'; po�o� a©� Cx�loaa tom �u�, e�e�7ocu THENCE S 48' 09' 18' W, A DISTANCE OF 445.31 FEET TO A SET 112-INCH �°�°�m B)g mm 09� 91 MOOD 3wm REEBAR, TAGGED "RLS 29875 THENCE N 41 ' 50' 42' W, A DISTANCE OF 299.88 FEET TO THE POINT OF Q Q 0 a BEGINNING. CONTAINING AN AREA OF 3.259 ACRES. c�,00 n�� oP ooa�a L�&ow�El�fl000w- REFERENCE NO. Co 12-83-08, P 1299-056 OV 12-05-23, G 1602254 R1 ORO VALLEY PAD ORO VALLEY ORD THIS PROJECT. PAD '� ORO VALLEY 6 5 STEAM PUMP OV RANCH H NEYWELL IOPO P1 A COUN Y/ ILCATALINA /'STATE PARK ---------- 4--ORO VALLEY �� v RAMS CANYON : PAD ORO VALLEY v '�9 'S, N UNSUBDIVIDED PAD ORO VALLEY SCALE: 3"= l MILE ll a LOCATION MAP A PORTION OF THE S. W. 114 OF SECTION 5 TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 14 EAST GILA & SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PIMA COUNTY, AZ SCALE: 3 "- l MILE LEGEND O FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT AS NOTED O FND. 112" IRON ROD, RLS 29873 21.53 ----. PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION (AS NOTED) EG EXISTING GROUND TOE TOE OF BERM, SLOPE ETC. TOP TOP OF BERM, SLOPE ETC. FL FLOWLINE OF SWALE _ D.F. DRAINAGE FLOW ARROWS DRAINAGE DISCHARGE POINT SLOPE INDICATOR -2634--- ___ -- -- EXISTING TOPO CONTOUR -- 2634 PROPOSED TOPO CONTOUR PROPERTY BOUNDARY EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY - - - - - - - - GRADING LIMITS (SEE SHEET 5) EASEMENT AS NOTED - STREET CENTERLINE EX. WSEL EXISTING WATER SURFACE ELEVATION - - E - - EXISTING UNDER GROUND ELECTRIC - - w - -®- - EXISTING WATER LINE AND VALVE -- S - -O- - EXISTING SEWER LINE AND MANHOLE OHE - -PP EXISTING OVER HEAD ELECTRIC & POWER POLE x x EXISTING FENCE NEW BARRICADE RAILING E] EXISTING ELECTRIC PEDESTAL/TRANSFORMER Cal EXISTING TELEPHONE/CABLE TV -71 EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT GROUTED ROCK RIPRAP HANDPLACED ROCK RIPRAP d d , NEW CONCRETE EXISTING CONCRETE d G SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE (SEE SHEET 2) NEW 112" GRAVEL OR PAVEMENT MILLINGS, I" THICK PARKING SPACE COUNTS (SEE SHEET 3) -T 0- IT, 9 7 13 P APR ] Q 20I1 J r. FINAL SITE PLAN BIG HORN COMMERCE CENTER � e o PERRY ADDRESS: 11278 N. ORACLE ROAD, 0 ORO VALLEY AZ 85737 34010 KENNETH D.� 0 ENGINEERING PERRY .�� A PORTION OF THE S. W. 114 OF SECTION 5 TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, Q�e �1� 505 WEST WETMORE ROAD RANGE 14 EAST GILA & SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY q S P. \3' TUCSON, AZ 85705 PIMA COUNTY, AZ "r NA CONTACT: KEN PERRY, P.E. SCALE: 1 " = 30' CONTOUR INTERVAL= 1.0' Expires: 9/30/19 PHONE: 520.620.9870 OV - ,SHEET 1 OF 6 � APRIL 13, 2017 z w w z _ ­�1;� v z Q GENERAL PAVING AND GRADING NOTES 1. ALL MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP ARE TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH PIMA COUNTY/CITY OF TUCSON STANDARD DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS (PC/COT SSPI, EDITION OF 2003, EXCEPT AS MODIFIED HEREBY. 2. ALL CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING METHODS SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH PC/COT SSPI, EDITION OF 2003, EXCEPT AS MODIFIED HEREBY. J. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE TO GRADING STANDARDS, CHAPTER 27.9 OF THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED. 4. EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL FOR STRUCTURES SHALL CONFORM TO PC/COT SSPI, SECTION 203-5. 5. EARTHWORK, EXCEPT AS MODIFIED BY THE SOILS REPORT OF RECORD, SHALL CONFORM TO PC/COT SSPI, SECTION 203. 6. AGGREGATE BASE COURSE SHALL CONFORM TO PC/COT SSPI, SECTION 303. 7. ASPHALTIC CONCRETE SHALL CONFORM TO PC/COT SSPI, SECTION 406, ASPHALTIC CONCRETE MIXTURE No. 2 SPECIFICATIONS. 8. ALL CONCRETE SHALL CONFORM TO PC/CDT SSPI, SECTION 1006, CLASS S, 3,000-PSI COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH AT 28 DAYS, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 9. A STAMPED SET OF APPROVED PLANS SHALL BE KEPT IN AN EASILY ACCESSIBLE LOCATION ON THE JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES OR DURING CONSTRUCTION. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION REGULATIONS. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL BLUE STAKE (1-800-782-5348) TO VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL PERMITS REQUIRED BY GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES. A ROW CONSTRUCTION PERMIT SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION RELATED ACTIVITIES WITHIN RAMS FIELD PASS ROW. 13. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL STREET SIGNS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY SUBDIVISION STREET STANDARDS - SIGNAGE POLICY. 14. PAVING CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST BOTH EXISTING AND NEW WATER VALVES, BOX COVERS, WATER METER BOXES, SANITARY SEWER MANHOLES AND CLEANOUT RINGS AND COVERS, TELEPHONE AND ELECTRIC MANHOLE RING AND COVERS TO THE NEW FINISHED GRADE. 15. UPON COMMENCEMENT OF WORK, TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE POSTED AND MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE WORK IS COMPLETED. ALL WARNING SIGNS, BARRICADES, ETC., SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES ADOPTED BY THE STATE OF ARIZONA PURSUANT TO A.R.S. 28- 650. 16. IF UNANTICIPATED CONDITIONS ARE ENCOUNTERED DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION AND ARE BEYOND THE SCOPE OF THE DESIGN, THE ENGINEER SHALL SUBMIT THE NECESSARY REVISED OR SUPPLEMENTAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PRIOR TO SUCH REVISONS/CHANGES BEING MADE IN THE FIELD. 17. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CARE AND MAINTENANCE OF EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS AND VEGETATION IN THE WORK AREA. PAVEMENT, CURBS AND ANY OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION ARE TO BE REPLACED BY THE CONTRACTOR. ANY UNDERGROUND PIPES, IRRIGATION LINES, IRRIGATION CONTROLS, DRAINS, STRUCTURES, OR OBSTRUCTIONS NOT SHOWN ON THESE PLANS SHALL BE MOVED, ALTERED, OR REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR WHEN ENCOUNTERED, AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER, AND IS A DEFINITE PART OF THIS PROJECT. 18. ACCEPTANCE OF THESE PLANS DOES NOT CONSTITUTE OR IMPLY ACCEPTANCE OF ANY OF THE FOLLOWING: a) WALL(S), RETAINING OR OTHER TYPE(S). b) ANY REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURE(S). c) ANY EMBANKMENT(S) WHOSE PRIMARY PURPOSE IS TO FUNCTION AS A RETENTION/DETENTION STRUCTURE. THE ITEMS LISTED ABOVE ARE APPROVED FOR LOCATION ONLY. SEPARATE PLAN CHECKS AND PERMITS ARE REQUIRED, ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE CODES OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY. 19. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GIVE FORTY-EIGHT (48) HOURS NOTICE WHEN THEY SHALL REQUIRE THE SERVICES OF THE ENGINEER OR ANY OTHER PERSON PROPERLY AUTHORIZED FOR SUCH PURPOSE FOR LAYING OUT ANY PORTION OF THE WORK. THEY SHALL ALSO DIG ALL STAKE HOLES NECESSARY TO GIVE LINE AND LEVELS AND SHALL PROVIDE ASSISTANCE CALLED FOR BY THE ENGINEER OR THEIR ASSISTANTS UPON ANY PART OF THE WORK WHENEVER SO REQUESTED, AND SHALL PRESERVE ALL STAKES SET FOR THE LINES, LEVELS OR MEASUREMENTS OF THE WORK IN THEIR PROPER PLACES UNTIL AUTHORIZED TO REMOVE THEM BY THE ENGINEERS. ANY EXPENSE INCURRED IN REPLACING ANY STAKES WHICH THE CONTRACTOR OR THEIR SUBORDINATES MAY HAVE FAILED TO PRESERVE SHALL BE CHARGED TO THE CONTRACTOR. 20. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO FURNISH, HAUL AND APPLY ALL WATER REQUIRED FOR COMPACTION AND FOR THE CONTROL OF DUST FROM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. THE COST THEREOF IS TO BE INCLUDED IN THE GRADING CONSTRUCTION PRICE. 21. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO FULLY COMPLY WITH ADEQ STORMWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REPORT AND POLLUTION PLANS PREPARED BY THE ENGINEER. THE COST THEREOF TO BE INCLUDED IN THE GRADING CONSTRUCTION PRICE. 22. BUILDING SITES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO WITHIN 0.10 FOOT OF FINISH BUILDING PAD ELEVATIONS AS STAKED BY THE ENGINEER. STREETS AND PARKING AREAS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO WITHIN 0.10 FEET OF FINISH SUBGRADE AS STAKED BY THE ENGINEER. 23. A REPORT OF SOILS INVESTIGATIONS, INCLUDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR GRADING PROCEDURES HAS BEEN PREPARED BY PATTISON-EVANOFF ENGINEERING, LLC DATED SEPTEMBER, 2016 JOB NO. 16-104 FOR THIS PROJECT. EARTHWORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS CONTAINED IN SAID REPORT AND ANY AMENDMENTS MADE THERETO. 24. THE SOILS ENGINEER SHALL OBSERVE, INSPECT AND TEST ALL CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: CLEARING, GRUBBING, SUBGRADE PREPARATION, STRUCTURAL, TRENCH EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL, MATERIAL TESTING, TOGETHER WITH PLACEMENT OF FILL. SAID ENGINEER SHALL CERTIFY IN WRITING, THAT ALL SOILS OPERATIONS AND MATERIALS USED FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT WERE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS AS SET FORTH IN THE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION OF RECORD AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE ACCEPTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. CERTIFICATION, IN WRITING, ARE TO BE RECEIVED BY THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PRIOR TO THE REQUEST FOR FINAL INSPECTION AND RELEASE OF ASSURANCES. 25. PERRY ENGINEERING ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY AND NEITHER GUARANTEES NOR WARRANTS THE RESULTS OF ANY SUBSURFACE EXPLORATIONS, THE CONCLUSIONS REACHED, RECOMMENDATIONS MADE, OR ANY TEST RESULTS PRESENTED. 26. GRADING BOUNDARIES SHALL BE CLEARLY MARKED, AND ALL WORK WILL BE CONFINED TO APPROVED PROJECT LIMITS AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. 27. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE SURVEYOR PROVIDING THE CONSTRUCTION LAYOUT TO VERIFY THE BENCHMARK AND COMPARE THE SITE CONDITIONS WITH THE PLANS AND SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OBSERVED. SHOULD ANY BENCHMARK, GRADE OR DESIGN INDICATED ON THE PLANS BE SUSPECT, THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED OF SAID BENCHMARK, GRADE OR DESIGN PROBLEM AT LEAST TWENTY-FOUR HOURS BEFORE CONSTRUCTION IS SCHEDULED TO BEGIN ON THE AFFECTED AREA. 28. IT SHALL BE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER (S), THEIR SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS, (AND/OR THEIR CONTRACTOR, THEIR SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS AS APPLICABLE) TO PURSUE ANY NEGOTIATIONS, OBTAIN ANY AGREEMENTS AND/OR PERMITS, ETC., FROM ALL NECESSARY OWNERS, PRIVATE AND/OR GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES IN CHARGE OF PROPERTIES AND/OR RIGHTS -OF -WAY ADJACENT TO (OR NEIGHBORING) THIS PROJECT, THAT MAY BE REQUIRED TO DO ANY WORK (CONSTRUCTION, ACCESS, MODIFICATIONS, GRADING, DRAINAGE, STRUCTURES, ROADS, ETC.) ENCPOACHING OR AFFECTING - DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY - ON -HESE ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND RIGHTS -OF -WAY IN ANY CONCEIVABLE MANNER, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER OR NOT THIS WORK IS SHOWN OR DESCRIBED ON THESE PLANS. 29. THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL SUBMIT AS -BUILT RECORD DRAWINGS AND CERTIFY IN WRITING THAT ALL IMPROVEMENTS, WHETHER PRIVATE OR PUBLIC, HAVE BEEN CONSTRUCTED, PLACED, INSTALLED, ETC. IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE ACCEPTED PLANS FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT. CERTIFICATIONS IN WRITING AND THE AS -BUILT RECORD DRAWINGS ARE TO BE RECEIVED BY THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY A MINIMUM OF TWO (2) WEEKS PRIOR TO THE REQUEST FOR CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY AND/OR FINAL INSPECTION BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND THE RELEASE OF ASSURANCES, EXCEPT FOR MODEL HOMES INTENDED TO BE USED FOR SALES PURPOSES. IF THE PROJECT IS PHASED THE ABOVE PERTAINS TO EACH PHASE. 30. THE TOWN WILL, UPON RECEIPT OF ALL NECESSARY CERTIFICATIONS AS OUTLINED ON THE IMPROVEMENT PLANS AND FINAL PLAT, PERFORM A FIELD REVIEW OF THE DEVELOPMENT. FIELD CONDITIONS, DESIGN OVERSIGHTS, ETC., MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL WORK AND/OR IMPROVEMENTS AS A RESULT OF SAID REVIEW. 31. ALL EASEMENTS MUST BE ACQUIRED BY OWNER/BUILDER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. DRAINAGE GENERAL NOTES 1. "ALL DRAINAGE WAYS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO APPROVED PLANS PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY PERMITS FORM THE TOWN ENGINEER AND/OR BUILDING OFFICIAL FOR PARCELS AFFECTED." AFFECTED PARCELS MUST BE SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED EITHER BY NUMBER IN NOTE OR BY OUTLINE ON THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. 2. "DRAINAGE MUST BE COLLECTED AND RELEASED FROM A PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT THE LOCATIONS AND IN THE MANNER EXISTING PRIOR TO DEVELOPMENT." J. "DRAINAGE WAYS MUST BE PROVIDED WHERE NECESSARY TO CARRY DRAINAGE FLOWS THROUGH OR FROM THE DEVELOPMENT AND SUCH DRAINAGE WAYS MUST BE DEDICATED AND MAINTAINED BY PROPERTY OWNERS OR PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION." 4. "DRAINAGE WAYS MUST BE DESIGNED TO NOT DISCHARGE ONTO PAVED STREETS, EASEMENTS OR PARKING AREAS." 5. "PARKING AREAS MUST NOT BE USED AS DETENTION BASINS." 6. "DRAINAGE MUST BE COLLECTED AND RELEASED FROM A PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT THE LOCATIONS AND IN THE MANNER EXISTING PRIOR TO DEVELOPMENT." GENERAL NOTES 1. UTILITY LOCATIONS AS INDICATED HEREIN WERE COMPILED BASED UPON THE SURVEY PROVIDED BY AMEC INFRASTRUCTURE, INC., PROJECT NUMBER 03-2003-078,. UTILITY LOCATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED TO BE EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE ENGINEER DOES NOT GUARANTEE THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF UTILITIES SHOWN HEREIN. PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE HORIZONTAL LOCATIONS AND VERTICAL ELEVATIONS OF ALL POTENTIALLY AFFECTED UTILITIES WITH THE APPROPRIATE ORGANIZATIONS, POT -HOLING IF NECESSARY CONTACT "BLUE STAKE" AT 1-800-782-5348 TWO (2) FULL WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. SATURDAYS, SUNDAYS AND HOLIDAYS ARE NOT CONSIDERED WORKING DAYS. 2. THESE GRADING PLANS ARE BASED UPON SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY AMEC INFRASTRUCTURE, INC., PROJECT NO. 03-2003-078. PERRY ENGINEERING, LLC ASSUMES NO -- -- RESPONSIBILITY AND NEITHER GUARANTEES NOR WARRANTS THE COMPLETENESS, ACCURACY OR RESULTS OF THIS SURVEY. ORO VALLEY WATER GENERAL NOTES - 1. "WATER INFRASTRUCTURE AS REPRESENTED ON THIS PLAN IS UBLIC} __ FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. A SEPARATE WATER _ORACLE ROAD _ IMPROVEMENT PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE ORO _ VALLEY WATER UTILITY (OVWU) FOR TECHNICAL REVIEW AND - - (ST-- ATE ROUTE 77) I COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE STATUTES, CODES AND SPECIFICATIONS. ADDITIONAL WATER INFRASTRUCTURE MAY BE - - SCALE: 1 "=50' DEEMED NECESSARY UPON REVIEW OF THE WATER - _ _ _ --� _ �� �-- I' C. IMPRO VEMEN T PLAN." J =--2635 ---- -_2635 --- --� AI OHE p PP E 0H � ------ 0 • �� n. .- - . - -.---...ON - ag ,2628 I .I c� f � I � 3 � �> = I zzzz EXISTING PAVEMENT WILL REMAIN IN PLACE. PAVEMENT WILL BE REMOVE AT THE TIME OF NEW PARKING LOT CONSTRUCTION. NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT ALL EXISTING UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND ABOVE GROUND) IN PLACE. EXISTING HIGH VOLTAGE ELECTRICAL LINES AND TELEPHONE, CABLE TV AND OR FIBER OPTIC IN THE VICINITY OF THIS PROJECT. ALL REMOVED ITEMS AND MATERIAL SHALL BE LEGALLY DISPOSED OF OFFSITE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. DEMOLITION PLAN DEMOLITION KEY NOTES: 1� SALVAGE AND CLEAN ONSITE ROCK WITHIN EXIST. BERM, FOR REUSE ON WEST SLOPE AND WITH IN BASINS. DISCARD ANY FILTER FABRIC (MIN. ALLOWABLE DIA=4'; d50=6') 20 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING FENCE REMOVE EXISTING 3'X3' CONCRETE SLAB ® SAW CUT & REMOVE EXISTING DEPRESSED CURB AND POST BARRICADE TO ACCOMMODATE NEW SIDEWALK SCUPPERS 50 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF ANY TRASH, DISCARDED ITEMS, BRUSH PILES, WOOD, ETC. FROM WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS © SAW CUT & REMOVE EXISTING VERTICAL CURB TO THE NEAREST JOINT TO ACCOMMODATE NEW CURB ACCESS RAMP ConUact Arizona B71 at least two Lull working tlays before you begin exCavatdon Nair, /aR�ZOO NA$�11. Call Sit or click Arizona811.com 34010 KENNETH PERRY Expires: 9130119 I 1 0 Maio LA 0 0 NOTES AND DEMOLITION PLAN BIG HORN COMMERCE CENTER ADDRESS: 11278 N. ORACLE ROAD, ENGINEERING ORO VALLEY AZ 85737 E A PORTION OF THE S. W. 114 OF SECTION 5 TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, 505 WEST WETMORE ROAD RANGE 14 EAST GILA & SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY TUCSON, AZ 85705 PIMA COUNTY, AZ CONTACT. KEN PERRY, P.E. SCALE: 1 " = 50' CONTOUR INTERVAL= 1.0' PHONE: 520.620.9870 APRIL 13, 2017 ov - SHEET 2 OF 6 w 4 J 0 cl- w CLE ROAD_(P�B---uc)--= -- --_- _ - - (STATE ROUTE 77) --___- W PROJECT to - -- - ---- ADOT R/ #gP-031-1-813 -�-� D-10T-342 m DWG.# o '0 1 D 70 \ o 1� C I L 3' 1 �5' S EXIST. SEWER M. H. RIM=2629.76 INV.=2615.0fr-S. INV.=2615.41 E. 8 " PVC SEWER (G-2002-128) W N o Lu �Ql) WLo N N oY oc o Om =o co W S a 11.3' ,I T 64 EXIST. SEWER M.H. RIM=2628.19 E. INV.=2618.19 W. INV=2618.29 4 u 1 <1 i 8 11 00 63.25' 7 ��' 8 � 0 $ N 9 8 'Da 0 3' cry N 87.4 9 0 8 .- N �, N 0 ' 9 9 ! 0 1 -9 MIN. g1.72 'Q)' 19 12.15 8 9 81•71 N �� o 8' TYP. g o 8 R9 v '�'sr- 10 , 8 S 55 T5 69.3 u, 9 MIN.4 o N_ 8 'MIN. 31'- 9 64.64 9 7 c �--- 9 � 7 63.v 9 63.31 ' 30.91 iili 1 5, 1 30.8 ❑• L 7, �N BLDG. 4 30.67' 63.9 30. 6 7' "' o s /P Lo R22' -1 BLDG. 1 BLDG. 2 BLDG. 3 41- ' Lo 00 N Lo O 10 4 N oo 35,0; z ® ®®== r=� ` T 93 82'! � I 9 8 81' 52.7' 'T 1 � 480 ' 1'8" I g 8 d'8 I - t--') �Al/ /-7 1 ,R2 .......... Q: 71 63 '1 9 81' 0 9 81'� f82' 9 J N I �1 8 SITE PLAN RIM=2628.19 E. INV.=2618.19 W. INV. =2618.29 PRI VA TE UTILITY PLAN IST. SEWER M.H. A=2638.96 1.=2610.96± •h- 1 30, 6.5)' 4 5 r N SCALE: 1 "=30' ----(IST ..83R 4TF LAN No RAMS FIELD PASS RD PER DKT. 7224, PG. 1 EXIST. SEWER M.H. 5� I RIM=2634.17 INV.=2622.39 E. INV.=2622.28 W. 60' '� \INGRESS/EGRESS I EASEMENT DKT. 7224, PG. 1387 0 :30- I � � rn Z `2 I _ of m - ✓rcT PVMT W - 3' c� I ,-8" PVC SEWER (G-96-087) I EXIST. SEWER M.H. RIM=2633.62 INV-=2623.52 F. k I \\\ c, \� 1I \� I I \� � � m �\ VlI o yl \ I I � I 34010 KENNETH D,� PERRY ti\'�, Contact Arinoma 817 at least twu full � worklnq days Ueiurr, you t,eyln excavatlon • �' CaII 811 or s6ick Arizona811.e•om SITE PLAN KEYNOTES 01 SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE 240' (LEFT), 190' (RIGHT) 02 (8) 2.5' TYPE 2 SIDEWALK SCUPPERS PER PC/COT SD 205 Q CONCRETE HEADER PER DTL 4, SHEET C4 ® CONCRETE CURB, NEW TO EXISTING PER PC/COT SD 211 05 CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER PC/COT SD 200 © CURB ACCESS RAMP PER PC/COT SD 207 07 SAW, CUT, TRIM, TACK AND JOIN PAVEMENT TO EXIST. PAVEMENT. SAWCUT MIN. OF 1 FT. INTO EXIST. PAVEMENT TO PROVIDE UNIFORM CONSTRUCTION JOINT ® CONCRETE VERTICAL CURB PER DTL 7 SHEET C4 CONC. WHEEL STOP PER DETAIL 5 SHEET C4 10 2" AC OVER 4" ABC PER DETAIL 6, SHEET C4, TYPICAL ALL NEW ASPHALT PAVING 11 3'x3' CATCH BASIN WITH (1) 12" CMP OUTLET PIPE 12 6" CONCRETE SLAB, DESIGN STRENGTH 3,000 P.S.I. W/ #4 REBAR, 12" O.C. BOTH WAYS. TAP AND JOIN CONC. TO NEW PVMT SURFACE. 1� ADA PARKING SIGN, SEE DTL. 1, SHEET C4 14 REPLACE EXISTING 8" WATER TEE WITH 8x8x8x6 CROSS TEE 0 (2) 6" 45' BENDS (PVC WATER) 16 CONCRETE CURB TERMINATION SECTIONS PER PC/COT 212 1� (4) 36" 0 SRP, UNDERGROUND STORAGE 1� 14' X 40' CLEAR APPROACH FOR REFUSE CONTAINER 19 NEW HANDPLACED RIPRAP D50=4", 12" THICK OVER MIRAFI FILTER FABRIC ® REFUSE AND RECYCLE ENCLOSURE. TYPICAL "TYPE B" PAVEMENT PATCH PER PC/COT SD 216 ® RETENTION BASIN, SEE GRADING PLAN - SHT C5 © FLOOD WALL BY SEPARATE PLANS ® 30' LANDSCAPE BUFFERYARO SETBACKS © GROUTED ROCK RIPRAP, D50= 6 ", EMBEDDED INTO 5" CONC. W/ 1.4X1.4 WOVEN WIRE FABRIC ® NEW BARRICADE RAILING PER PC/COT SD.# 105 OPEN AREA CAL CULA TIONS SITE = 141,962 SQ. FT. 100.0% OPEN AREA = 4 7,2 73 SQ. FT. 33.30% CONSTRUCTION = 28,985 SQ. FT. 20.42% PARKING CAL CULA TIONS BASE ON BUILDING FOOT PRINTS ACTUAL USAGE PER OCCUPIED SPACE TO BE DETERMINED. RESTAURANT = 6,000 SF. 10/1000 SF. 60 GENERAL RETAIL = 22,985 SF. 4/1000 SF. 91.94 TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED = 152 TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED = 152 REQUIRED MIN. NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE SPACES 152/50 1 = 3 ADA SPACES PROVIDED = 8 SPACES RESTAURANT (6 STAND. ADA & 2 ADA VAN ACCESSIBLE) BICYCLE PARKING PROVIDED: 153115 = 10.20 SPACES 50 % CLASS 1 = 5 50 % CLASS II = 5 (THE CLASS II BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE OF INVERTED U TYPE) LOADING SPACES REQUIRED TOTAL SF = 29,025 COMMERCIAL LOW INTENSITY REQUIRED: 2 PROVIDED: 2 SITE AND UTILITY PLAN BIG HORN COMMERCE CENTER ERRY ADDRESS: 11278 N. ORACLE ROAD, ENGINEERING ORO VALLEY AZ 85737 E A PORTION OF THE S. W. 1/4 OF SECTION 5 TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, 505 WEST WETMORE ROAD RANGE 14 EAST GILA & SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY TUCSON, AZ 85705 PIMA COUNTY, AZ CONTACT. KEN PERRY, P.E. SCALE: 1 " = 30' CONTOUR INTERVAL= 1.0' PHONE. 520. 620. 9870 APRIL 13, 2017 OV - SHEET 3 OF 6 0 w __--.-_---_ ------.-_-- SBuc) ORACLEROAD-T--- �-�_T�77)--((STATER _ - - 1�> W PROJECT _--- _ --- - ADOT R/ pp-031-I-813 rn 10T-342 DWG• # D- -_--- -- - _ o -----2639-- - -- - -_ ___--- -----2638- V) ---- - ------ _-_-------2637-------N _ - - 6 263 - N --- w �\ \ -- o _ ---- - - wo------ 634 W 1 - - EP - - - - Qo- - - 2633 ----- --- ----- -- Iv --------- �' 63 \ -- _ - - 1 � - - - -- ---- -- ----------------- - -- 100=130fs� cn a = - i /----------- ----- w DA=20.6 rn o '"ti o m \� OT. 2 7. 00 TC3 .37 63 TC= 31.08 C' \ G=30,52- ,. / co / A..,,. `L�° _ 1� TC= 9.51 G=2 .07 EXISTIN S�l FLOW F SITE Q 100=13.8cfs DA=2.7 AC, BOTTOM ELEV. 2627.0'I L0 NN I o C) I czn 5 EXISTING HE I bl FLOW FRM SITEI Q 100=14.4cfs s BOTTOM EILEV. 2627.3 I i FR0 I �� TC9 G= 8.428. 4� I �c. c) I \ 00 .� I N SCALE. 1 "=30' C.1. =1. 0' Q 100=114cfs DA=18.5 AC _ _ ___ - - _-i - .,. 'ems - F r '" •' o II !C= 36.61 2633-- - = -2 RAMS FIELD PASS RD IN o -- - - - ---_-_-2632- - --- -- - - - - - - - - 2631- PER DKT. 7224, PG. 1387 �- - --. -2630 0 I 7 I 7 - --- 2628- - - -- -- _2629- - - - - -- -- - - - - ___..� •��, / � � � �.�. � o �' o cNo 0. 7% 0 0 iLi \, \ 0 II I Jo�"'� 3:1 \ I I 30.41 oo '\`�� 7°\\\1\ - / � 60 I o\ III�I\ I I INGRESSEGRESS 0.28 EASEMENT DKT. 7224, o INS) I o PG. 1387 33.32 FFE � �© .•��.`s''�� � ,,�'� IIIIII III I I QQ � I = a. I V. - I a a. / / f 4- III I zo ly `° I 8 LOWI THRU Z co / i 26�2' III 1 S PPE6S U "' / 1 ,n IIII Q1 0=Q6.1cfs oY \ / 32.50 FFE / 33.20 FFE I I I , ci 32.00 FFE 0 " ' I XIST. I PVMT � I C) I 3 5 I Lc I I _ AC= 31.07 G 3 .1 Lo I TC=34.20 \ I -_ c TOP 3005 G 33.62 i. I INV.=27.05 AD '�� zq�" N C� Z 2' 20' 24' PAAL 2n' gn' 9d' Peel em WEST P.A.A.L. (TYP SCALE. • 1 "-10' I AC= T. 0. P. 30.10 INV. =27.10 1 1 , Contaet Arlvona 811 at least twu Tull � working tlays beTore you begin e�x�cavablon ' -' AR�ZONA8�11. Call S11 or chick Arizonafill.c•nt � , 20' 24' 20' SIDEWALK WHEEL STOP MATCH EXIST. GRADE VARIES 2.07. 1.0q FLAPGATE SEE - DETAIL D SHEET 5 5' EAST P.A.A.L. (TYP SCALE. 1 "=10' MIN. TOP EL. =31.80 R (SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS BY OTHERS) BLDG �!/� FFE-33. -cN '-11 I- 2' HIGH CMU WALL BY OTHERS 2' °1 VARIES (SEE PLAN) V WSEL=29.14 : BASIN INV. =27.00 WEST DETENTION BASIN VARIES 3MINN.. � TE. CONTRACTOR TO SALVAGE AND CLEAN ONSITE ROCK ALONG EXIST. BERM, THEN PLACE OVER FILTER FABRIC AS INDICATED. (MIN. ALLOWABLE DIA=4" d50=6') 5' SCALE. • 1 "-5' 1.5' PARKING LOT 30'f (8) 2.5' TYPE 2 SCUPPERS PER PC/COT SD Q 100=12.1 CFS AI/1DTLIC-A C -r rrn► ►nnrn IA11 r-r 1 1r-lelrr-I - A 1 A r -, GRADING FOR UNDERGROUND STORAGE SCALE, • 1 "-5' A ^ � 4 n • SCALE.- 1 "=10' I.V.I JV.VO INV. =27.60 FINAL GFADING AND PAV NG PLA BIG HORN COMMERCE CENTER ERRY ADDRESS: 11278 N. ORACLE ROAD, ENGINEERING ORO VALLEY AZ 85737 505 WEST WETMORE ROAD A PORTION OF THE S. W. 114 OF SECTION 5 TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 14 EAST GILA & SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY TUCSON, AZ 85705 PIMA COUNTY, AZ CONTACT. KEN PERRY, P.E. SCALE: 1 " = 30' CONTOUR INTERVAL= 1.0' PHONE: 520.620.9870 APRI L 13, 2017 oV - SHEET 4 OF 6 _ .r-% iDl�r.l _--- i- Z W w a co w U z a z IN 0 w Q a Fa STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN w IN "= 30' KEY NOTES LEGEND O SEDIMENT WATTLES. SEE DTL. 2, THIS SHEET ...... .......... ........ No m m No m m . AND GRADING LIMITS O STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. SEE DTL. 1, THIS SHEET . . . . . . O MATERIAL DELIVERY AND STORAGE, AND STAGING AREA. ............... STORAGE STAGING O HAZARDOUS, SOLID, AND LIQUID WASTE AREAS. WASTE STORAGE O VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT FUELING AREA. FUELING/ MAINT. GEOTEXTILE UNDE STA 18 "- (TY Convict Arlrzmima 611 at IeasT ti+wv. full working (Jays beffore wing (Jays you begin e�xcauittlon �sw AR�ZONA$���1. Call 811 or click ArIhZUPla811.com CTALlf- — 34010 KENNETH D PERRY „ Expires: 9130119 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE NTS /A TED SOIL 'SLOPE SIDE TYPICAL WATTLE SPACING BASED ON SLOPE GRADIENT STRAW WATTLE INSTALLATION ENGINEERING 505 WEST WETMORE ROAD TUCSON, AZ 85705 CONTACT. KEN PERRY, P.E. PHONE. 520. 620. 9870 NTS STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN BIG HORN COMMERCE CENTER ADDRESS: 11278 N. ORACLE ROAD, ORO VALLEY AZ 85737 A PORTION OF THE S. W. 114 OF SECTION 5 TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 14 EAST GILA & SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PIMA COUNTY, AZ SCALE. 1 " = 30' CONTOUR INTERVAL= 1.0' APRIL 13, 2017 Ov - SHEET 6 OF