Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOV100807oof t73/ [of7C 07: 10 f 9L-10" 1A4er Ah�o TOWN OF ORO VALLEY r PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION �,• a 11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE, ORO VALLEY AZ Phone: (520) 229-4800 Fax: (520) 742-1022 Town of Oro BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION r FOR: x Zoning Variance Note: Submittals are due by noon Zoning Interpretation _ Appeal of Administrative Decision CASE NO.:?;' -, MATURE OF REQUEST: Allow for building screen walls above existing building to a height of 42' and 47' to conceal roof mounted equipment used to heat, cool aTid exhaust the buildings new research and APPLICANT: Ventana Medical Systems. Inc PHONE: 520-229-3780 FAX 520-229-4221 ADDRESS: 1910 E. Innovation park•'drive Oro Valley, AZ OWNER; Roche Diagnostics ADDRESS: 1910 E. Innovation park drive Oro Valley, AZ Southeast corner Innovation PROPERTY LOCATION FOR VARIANCE REQUEST: park drive, Vistoso Village ou evar PARCEL #: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: CURRENT ZONIN&. C P -1 APPLICABLE FEE: ATTACHMENTS: A (b,6 A g-bo ) LnU 1 SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT (ALSO PRINT NAME) DATE Ub/ W/ Xk3t2d MI: 10 f RL-1 oc¢ SUPPLB.MIENTAL QUl'iS'lt'IONS FOR APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE Please provide the following information addressing 1 — S in the Findings from Sections 21.6 I of t ie Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised (OVZCR). in order to authorize a variance request, the Board will e searching for sufficient evidence in accordance with the findings. 1. Are there special circumstances or conditions applying to the property referred to in the application iucluding its $ize, shape, topography, location or surroundings which do not apply to other properties in the district? The CP-Z of property does not address screen wall heights and existing 's"`v walls on building 2 have been approved to exceed 36' 2. Are tyre special cirm stances that exist that are not self imposed or created by the owner/applicant? The screen wall height as requested in intended to meet the intend of the oro valley code to conceal all roof mounted e�ui ment. 3. Is :the authorizing of the variance necessary for the preservation and etljoyment of substantial property riglrts? The Client is expanding their R&D departments to'stay a competitive company and grow and expand their business. 4. If granted, will the variance impose such conditions as will assure that the authorizing of the adjustment shall not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which such prop m is located? Other properties in the area are built to 45, above grade to top of screen wall S. If granted, will the variance be the minimum necessary to afford relief and will not materially affect the health, safety, aid welfare of the neighborhood or surrounding pip cttics. The design and construction team are woM129 to make the screen wall height as short as possible and still meet the requirement of concealment. APPROVED By- �C/PZ/DR /8 7-3 -Z DATE o'1s1a-C� �---pry P. /-,t C,)-r- )q- ✓ e k _ Sz r�n�►�� INNOVATION PARK DRIVE l 7' & VENTANA CAMPUS SITE PLAN • )S IS n w w•L I•m-v NORTH Aink ADVANTECH FACILITY DESIGN INC Ambledun - Engin"ring Andy Anden•nt LL6 Schn•M•r •nd A • l•tu � sm-six-eiu sup I' 0 aT W./w "wo B M/AI/w M RENEW C W/m/CR PREEtNWVY f m �u WOM giNni V. u tl .EU W.' n W RL Moo s VENTANA CAMPUS SITE PUN A100 1 0 1 300'-0" BUILDING 2 OF 0 f • 0 19 RENOVATION PLAN s+n-+-0 Nol:Trl 1 I I I 1 J Q I-T ADVANTECH FACILITY DESIGN INC Archiwmro • Enginwing II 11 „o uo-em�uo, Mdy Mdenon� LLC -- — — '�GneMNdeOtletae II II 11 it I III_ M z " z Q iAlCL _� — -- I= y fY N s __= i H W w {L m d o a a N Z o Z Q o Z Z J W _ o � m Q _ WE f, II / A i , a/upa n w KMl�ryW ILn� I B �/i+/m um ienu oxwx er u exrum er. tt fI0 f9L A" BUILDING 2 ROOF RENOVATION PLAN A400 MM 10 WRY FY.WM SULUM �\ 47'-6'.. 1 BUILDING 2 WEST ELEVATION 0 2 4 0 16 47'-VSCALE: 1/8"=1'-0' amrs m rota OmnYe aYmre BUILDING 2 NORTH ELEVATION 0 2 4 0 16 2 4 3 BUILDING 2 EAST ELEVATION 0 2 4 0 16 SCALE : t/a--r-Cl' 47'-V" +0'-C$ ADVANTECH FACILITY DESIGN W AmMhwiun - Enpirwrbg ww x.►w wi m arYre.Yrr.e�r� vff �mw B M/" one Pam c */asps nmrvur mm FPGFSI'fYYYYQt t0iiium aannL m: u aexem Ye n as ne ea+ m�a r. m rYn[Y BUILCING 2 MEMOR ELEVATIONS 4 BUILDING 2 SOUTH ELEVATION 0 2 4 B 16 SCALE: 1/9'=1'-0' A501 MINUTES ORO VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT REGULAR SESSION JULY 22, 2008 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE CALL TO ORDER - 3:00 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: John Hickey, Member Colleen Kessler, Member Paul Parisi, Member Bart Schannep, Member Member Schannep served as Chair for the meeting of July 22, 2008. MINUTES Approval of the Minutes of June 13, 2008 MOTION: A motion was made by Member Hickey and seconded by Member Kessler to approve the minutes of June 13, 2008 as corrected. MOTION carried, 4-0. 1. CASE NO: OV10-08-06, Lorne and Marilyn Brown request a variance from the required 15' rear yard setback to 10'. Subject (parcel #224- 27-158E) located at 11025 N. Guava Drive, Oro Valley, AZ, 85737. Chair Schannep swore in the witnesses intending to testify. Rick Herrington, Herrington DAP Architectural Designers and Planners, commented that a correction should be made to the Staff report noting that it was a request for the rear yard setback (not side yard). He then explained that they designed the structure (detached garage, patio and storage building) to have the least impact on neighbors. He explained that the structure would protrude 6-8 feet above grade on the high end of property but it will not obstruct views. Mr. Herrington also reported that there is no negative impact on drainage to this property or the neighbors' property. He also explained that the retaining walls would be engineered and approved by the Oro Valley Building Safety Department. Lorne Brown, applicant, explained that the purposed detached garage is being constructed to house a recreational vehicle (RV). He further explained that the smaller adjacent building is for storage purposes and that there is an outdoor kitchen/patio area planned. 07/22/08 Minutes, Board of Adjustment 2 Mr. Herrington explained that the overall height of the proposed buildings would not exceed the height of the existing residence. In response to a question from Member Kessler, Mr. Brown explained that he does not currently own an RV but wants to provide a place for storage before purchasing. He explained that their Homeowners Association (HOA) requires that recreational vehicles be in an enclosure to store on their property. Discussion followed regarding access, parking and maneuverability of the RV, rotation of the garage, required rear and side setbacks, most optimum design, letter from HOA approving the tentative construction of the RV garage, the property sits approximately 38 feet above the level of the street and the outdoor kitchen/patio area. Patty Hayes, Zoning Inspector, reviewed the Staff report highlighting the following: Applicant is requesting to build a detached garage, patio and storage building with a 5 foot encroachment in the rear yard setback (10 feet from property line). Rear yard setback for a detached accessory building is 15 feet in a R1-43 zoning. Tentative approval from HOA was received. Staff received an e-mail from the resident two houses to the north in opposition to this case as he felt his views would be compromised. Neighbor to the south called stating that they had no objections. In response to a question from Member Kessler, Ms. Hayes confirmed that a detached storage garage is a permitted use on this property. She also explained that the Town will allow parking of RVs on the lot but the HOA requires that they be in a garage. In response to a question from Chair Schannep, Ms. Hayes explained that the turning radius and size of the RV would determine whether or not the garage alone (without the patio/outdoor kitchen) would fit within the required setback. In response to a question from Member Hickey regarding the plot plan, Ms. Hayes explained that the stairs are not part of the variance. Member Kessler further commented that if they moved the garage and angled it, then they could pull straight in; however, backing down the steep driveway would not be feasible. She stated that she felt that they needed the turn around space in order to be safe since the lot was not flat. Ms. Hayes confirmed that backing out of the driveway into the street would be a safety issue regardless of the elevation of the lot. 07/22/08 Minutes, Board of Adjustment Chair Schannep opened the public hearing. There being no speakers, the public hearing was closed. Mr. Herrington confirmed that backing out into street would be very dangerous. He explained that there is a curve by the driveway so oncoming traffic would not be able to see the RV exiting. However by driving forward, the applicant can see any oncoming traffic. MOTION: A motion was made by Member Hickey and seconded by Member Kessler to approve OV10-08-06, a request to reduce the rear yard setback from 15 feet to 10 feet. Member Hickey commented that he looked at the minimum that it would take to complete this project. He stated that the structure is required by the HOA and it seems that the applicants have done the best that they can with the property limitations. He stated that in his opinion, the variance meets the five criteria. Chair Schannep commented that in order to maintain property rights, the Board has a history of granting variances for garages or other structures that may have not been built with the original structure when it appears that the surrounding neighbors all have one. He stated that he was having a hard time with Finding B "special circumstances were not created by the owner or applicant". He stated that everyone does not have an RV garage and it will be infringing on the setback because of the outdoor patio/kitchen area. Member Hickey commented that the corner would still be within the 10 foot mark without the other structures. He stated that the applicant has stated that the best and safest way to park the vehicle is to have the garage angled. He said that due diligence has been done by the applicant. Member Hickey also commented that it is not the Boards business to tell people what they can buy but more how they use their property. Member Kessler commented that she sympathizes with the neighbor that e- mailed about possible blocked views. However, the applicants are allowed to build a garage on the lot and it is an allowable height. She stated that even if they didn't purchase the RV, they could still build this structure. Member Kessler stated that she was struggling with Finding C "necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of personal property rights" as she was not certain that it would affect the enjoyment of their property. Member Hickey commented that the HOA has the effect of a government agency and it is requiring them to build the structure. He stated that the Board can not tell the applicant that they can not buy an RV. Member Parisi commented that this variance is strictly a setback issue and that it meets the 5 criteria. r 07/22/08 Minutes, Board of Adjustment 4 Chair Schannep stated that he would not support this variance request as he felt that it was not a special circumstance. He stated that he believed that the garage could be situated within the required setback. MOTION carried, 3-1 with Member Schannep opposed. 2. CASE NO: OV10-08-07, Ventana Medical Systems request a variance from the allowed 36' building height to 47'6". Subject (parcel #219-20- 8170) located at 1910 E. Innovation Park Drive, Oro Valley, AZ 85737 Chair Schannep swore in the witnesses intending to testify. Gregg Forszt, Ventana Medical Systems, explained that they renovating an existing building from office space to lab space which will require larger air conditioning units. He explained that they are requesting a variance to increase the building height to 47 feet 6 inches to allow for screening of the HVAC units. He then reviewed the building layout depicting the screen walls that would be required to hide the new HVAC equipment and exhaust stacks that would be on the top of the building. Terrel Thomas, Advantech Architects, explained that the tallest exhaust stack is set back towards the center of building. Mr. Forszt further explained that as required by the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development (PAD), the plans were submitted to the Rancho Vistoso Homeowners Association (HOA) for approval. Discussion followed regarding: Current building is approximately 60,000 square feet and about one third of the space is lab space so there are already high screening walls installed on portions of the building. Air exchange requirements for lab space are considerably different than for office space. 100% of the air must be taken out of the building at least 30 times an hour. (Office setting is 10 - 15 times per hour). Another building exists on their campus that is over the 36 foot limit. Screen walls are metal louvers and will be painted to match what currently exists. Patty Hayes, Zoning Inspector, reviewed the staff report highlighting the following: Ventana Medical Systems is remodeling the interior of an existing building from office space to a laboratory. Remodeling requires the addition of large rooftop air conditioning and venting units. Screening requirement exceeds allowed 36 foot height. 07/22/08 Minutes, Board of Adjustment 5 Campus Park Industrial zoning does not provide for a 10 foot allowance for screening requirements as other zoning districts do. Staff has not received any comments on this variance request. In response to a question from Member Kessler, Chief Civil Attorney Joe Andrews explained that the near -by Sanofi Aventis project has a 46 foot height but because it was new construction, their building height was approved through the Development Review Board and the Council. Chair Schannep opened the public hearing. There being no speakers, the public hearing was closed. In response to a question from Member Hickey, Mr. Forszt explained that in order to get screen walls to be engineered so that they mechanically fit on the rooftop, they must be close to the parapet wall so that the existing rooftop does not collapse. Member Hickey also questioned whether the HVAC units could be moved elsewhere on the campus so that a variance would not be required and that the potential for lightening hits would be reduced. Mr. Forszt stated that they could possibly place them in the parking lot (but it is in the front of the building). However, this would cause mechanical issues in forcing the air into the building. He also explained that they have 67-68 units on the rooftop and some them have been hit by lightening but they have provided grounding which helps mitigate the problem. Mr. Forszt then reviewed the site layout and explained that they were very limited to space near the existing building for installation of HVAC units on the ground. MOTION: A motion was made by Member Parisi and seconded by Member Kessler to approve OV10-08-07, a request to increase the building height from 36 feet to 47 feet 6 inches. Member Parisi stated that this variance request meets the criteria and it was an unusual circumstance. Member Kessler stated that if the applicant were to construct the building "from scratch", they would be probably be allowed 46 feet. She stated that they are only asking for 1 1/2 feet over that. She stated that she did not think that it was a special privilege since there is another building in the immediate area that is already 46 feet in height. Chair Schannep stated that he supports the motion. MOTION carried, 3-1 with Member Hickey opposed. ADJOURNMENT r 07/22/08 Minutes, Board of Adjustment MOTION: A motion was made by Member Hickey and seconded by Member Kessler to adjourn at 3:45 p.m. MOTION carried, 4-0. Prepared by: Roxana Garrity, CIVIC Deputy Town Clerk AGENDA ORO VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT REGULAR SESSION JULY 23, 2008 Oro Valley Town Hall Council Chambers 11,000 N. La Canada Drive CALL TO ORDER: at or after 3:00 p.m. ROLL CALL MINUTES Approval of the Minutes of June 13, 2008. AT THE CALL OF THE CHAIR, THE AGENDA ITEMS MAY BE TAKEN IN ANY ORDER, AS DEEMED APPROPRIATE. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. CASE NO: OV10-08-06, Lorne and Marilyn Brown request a variance from the required 15' rear yard setback to 10'. Subject (parcel #224-27-158E) located at 11025 N. Guava Drive, Oro Valley, AZ, 85737. 2. CASE NO: OV10-08-07, Ventana Medical Systems request a variance from the allowed 36' building height to 47'6". Subject (parcel #219-20-8170) located at 1910 E. Innovation Park Drive, Oro Valley, AZ 85737 ADJOURNMENT A packet of agenda materials, as listed above, is available for public inspection at least 24 hours prior to the BOA meeting in the Town Hall Administration Building, during regular business hours. The Town of Oro Valley complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If a disabled person planning to attend this meeting requires any special accommodations, please notify the Town Clerk at 229- 4700. NOTICE TO SPEAKERS Members of the public have the right to speak during any posted public hearing; however, those items not listed as a public hearing are for consideration and action by the Board during the course of its business meeting. Members of the public may be allowed to speak on these topics at the discretion of the Chair. If you wish to address the Board on any item(s) on this agenda, please complete a speaker card located on the Agenda table at the back of the room and give it to the Clerk of the Board. Please indicate on the speaker card which item number and topic you wish to speak on. Please step forward to the podium when the Chair announces the item(s) on the agenda, which you are interested in addressing. "Notice of Possible Quorum of the Oro Valley Town Council: In accordance with Chapter 3, Title 38, Arizona Revised Statutes and Section 2-4-2 of the Oro Valley Town Code, a majority of the Town Council may attend the above referenced meeting as a member of the audience only." Posted: 7-17-08 11:00 a.m. ekf DRAFT MINUTES ORO VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT SPECIAL SESSION June 13, 2008 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE CALL TO ORDER - 3:00 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Colleen Kessler, Member Paul Parisi, Member Bart Schannep, Member EXCUSED: John Hickey, Member MINUTES - Approval of the Minutes of April 22, 2008 MOTION: A motion was made by Member Schannep and seconded by Member Kessler to approve the minutes of April 22, 2008. MOTION carried, 3-0. CASE NO: OV10-08-04, Desco Southwest, represented by the Planning Center requests relief from the 250' distance required from a convenience use to residentially zoned properties. Subject (parcel #219-47-017A, 018A, 0050, 0060, 004A, 004C, 004B) located on the northwest corner of La Canada Drive and Tangerine Road, Oro Valley, AZ, 85737. Chair Parisi swore in the witness intending to testify. Bob Conant, Planning Center, representing Desco Southwest, stated that the property being considered (known as the Miller Ranch property) is located at the northwest corner of La Canada Drive and Tangerine Road and has TP and C-1 zoning. He stated that the current property owners want to build a bank with a drive -through use on this corner. He explained that the C-1 zoning provides for a 250 foot setback from a residential district to help protect residences from light, noise, etc. Mr. Conant reviewed the zoning district line on the west and stated that they are asking for relief from the 250 foot setback by 25 feet. He stated that the buildings will block light and there is a wash/riparian area between the residents and the commercial area. Mr. Conant further reviewed the Zoning Map and an Aerial Context Map for the property and stated that there is confusion regarding the zoning lines and a determination needs to be made regarding the R1-36 zoning line on the east. He stated that they are asking that the R1-36 zoning lines be along the property lot lines of the Vistoso Gateway subdivision. He explained that this would then 06/13/08 Board of Adjustment, Special Session IIIII IGtes 2 compare to Verde Ranch subdivision just south of the Miller Ranch property as the zoning district boundary line is "well shy" of the right-of-way of Tangerine Road. Mr. Conant explained that if the lot lines were determined to be along the property lines then they would not need a variance on the east side, only on the west side. At the request of Member Schannep, Mr. Conant clarified that they are asking that the residential district line in this case be moved back along the property line to follow the lot lines. He explained that traditionally the Town did not include the rights -of -way in the zoning. In response to a question from Member Kessler, Mr. Conant explained that the Town's Zoning Code references the district boundary and it is the property boundary that is causing the confusion in the determination. He also confirmed that they would need a 25 foot variance on the west side due to the zoning district boundary line. Patty Hayes, Zoning Inspector, reviewed the staff report highlighting the following: Applicant is requesting relief from the 250 foot distance required from a convenience use to residentially zoned properties. (Business with drive -through use is considered a convenience use). A bank is an allowed use on this property. Property owners within 300 feet of the property were notified of the hearing. Property was posted and hearing was advertised in the Daily Territorial and on line. Staff received no comment in support or opposition to this case. Property was rezoned from R1-144 to TP and C-1 in February 2007. The distance measured from a convenience use to a residential district is from the residential property boundary (lot line) not the house structure. Zoning districts in the Town extend over into the street right-of-way thus causing the zoning of the property to extend beyond platted property lines. Maps not clearly defined. Possibly eliminate the 250 foot requirement on this particular pad only may be best way to approach. Member Schannep questioned whether the Board was being asked to interpret the Zoning Code or to accept the property line verses the residential district line. Chief Civil Deputy Attorney Joe Andrews stated that the Board could try to determine where the zoning district boundaries are or they can grant a variance. Staff is recommending that the 250 foot setback not apply for this specific lot. However, the Board can determine the lot and boundary lines. In response to a question from Member Keesler, Mr. Andrews explained that there is no building allowed in the wash and it would also be re -vegetated by the applicant. 06/13/08 Board of Adjustment, Special Session IIIII Iltes In response to a question from Chair Parisi, Ms. Hayes stated that it is customary to have a drive -through use with stand alone bank buildings. Chair Parisi opened the Public Hearing. He then swore in those witnesses intending to testify. Scott Christie, Oro Valley resident, stated that he lives just west of this property. He questioned whether the variance would apply to any other areas. (Chair Parisi explained that this variance would apply only to the bank and would not affect any future buildings.) Bill Adler, Oro Valley resident, stated that the intent of the ordinance is to protect residences. He stated that the reason for the relief request has nothing to do with anything except for the design of this use. He said that the land is not creating a hardship; it is just that the applicant was wanting to place more uses on the property than space allows. He stated that the square footages should be reduced on the buildings and then a variance would not be needed. Chair Parisi closed the public hearing. In response to a question from Member Keesler, Mr. Conant explained that the owner/developer wants to place the bank on this corner. He stated that there have been a number of iterations of this particular plan. If the bank were moved to the west it would create a worse situation. He also explained that the bank with a drive -through would have to go through the Conditional Use Permit process. MOTION: A motion was made by Member Schannep and seconded by Member Kessler to deny the variance for case OV10-08-04. DISCUSSION: Member Schannep stated that he tended to go the "cleaner" route but by making this change, it would go against the intent of the zoning. He also stated that he felt that this case did not meet all five criteria and the problem was being created by the property owner. Member Kessler concurred and also stated that she would be concerned about setting a precedent for other measurements and variances in the future. She also stated that other uses could be applied to this pad that would fall into the boundaries of the property and the bank use with a drive -through is bigger than was meant for the pad. MOTION carried, 3-0. 2. CASE NO: OV10-08-05, Paul Hofmann, represented by 3D architectural Designs, requests a variance from the required 15' side yard setback to 10'. Subject (parcel #224-34-1370) located at 935 W. Landoran 06/13/08 Board of Adjustment, Special Session rotes 4 Lane, Oro Valley, AZ 85737 Chair Parisi swore in the witness intending to testify. Frank Rendon, 3D Architectural Designs, representing the applicant, Paul Hofmann, stated that they are asking that the side yard setback be reduced to 10 feet to allow a better functioning garage and driveway. He explained that the setback of the property when zoned by Pima County was 10 feet; however, when Oro Valley rezoned the area, the setback was changed to 15 feet. He reviewed pictures depicting the access to the current garage, the proposed garage and driveway and the large palo verde tree that hinders access. He further explained that other properties surrounding the subject property have 10 yard setbacks. In response to a question from Member Schannep regarding "tilting" the garage on the property, Mr. Rendon stated that even if the new garage were tilted, it would still encroach into the 15 foot setback. In response to questions from Chair Parisi and Member Keesler, Mr. Rendon stated that the palo verde tree is about 50 - 60 years old and provides shade for the house. He explained that the tree is about 2 - 3 feet from the corner of the garage. He stated that they have worked on the design for over a year to try to make the garage work. Mr. Rendon explained that in order to make the roof line functional and to not move the tree and keep the garage accessible for two vehicles, they could only make the 10 foot setback work. Zoning Inspector Patty Hayes reviewed the staff communication and highlighted the following: Property owner is requesting a variance from the required 15 foot side yard setback to 10 feet to build a detached garage. Property owners within 300 feet of the property were notified of the hearing. Property was posted and hearing was advertised in the Daily Territorial and on line. Staff received one inquiry but the caller had no opinion. A member of the Homeowner's Association also called but had no objection. House was built in 1963 in Pima County's CR1 zoning district which required a 10 foot side yard setback. Oro Valley's Zoning Code was adopted in 1981 with a 15 foot side yard setback required for R1-36 zoning. Chair Parisi opened the public hearing. He then swore the witnesses intending to testify. Bill Adler, Oro Valley resident, commented that it is clear that the hardship has been created by the design of the original house. He stated that it is not the conditions of the property that are creating the hardship; it is the house location, size, design, etc. He stated that it is a tough decision but the previous zoning is not a justification for a variance. 06/13/08 Board of Adjustment, Special Session I I I"tes 5 Paul Hofmann, owner of subject prope rty,'stated that he had submitted a letter with pictures and information regarding his property with his application. However, he had two additional statements from neighbors to the north and to the south expressing support of his request that he also wanted to present to the Board (items were presented to the Board for their consideration). Mr. Hofmann further explained that his house was built in 1963 along with many other houses in the neighborhood. The houses were built on properties with 10 foot sideyard setbacks so most of the homes were placed on their property with those provisions. He stated that his house was built with a carport that was later converted to a flat -roof garage and now he was trying to upgrade his property with a garage that will allow his family to park their cars and to also have additional storage. He stated that the law (ARS 9-462.06) provides for changes when it is justified and that the same privileges afforded to the neighbors should be afforded to all. He explained that they have tried to reconfigure the placement of the garage and they can not do it without a five-foot variance. He stated that if they cut the corner differently for the placement of the garage, they can't fit a second car in as the depth would not be great enough. He also explained that if they turn the garage, they can get a greater depth without it sticking out into the backyard. Mr. Hofmann further explained that the new structure will compliment the existing house and their goal was to improve the value of the property and put it to its highest function. In response to a question from Member Schannep, Mr. n explained that they can't currently park in the garage because they do have to store items in it. He further explained that even if there was nothing in the garage, it is very small with a ceiling height of about 6 1/2 feet high so it is much smaller than you would expect to see. He stated that they have always only been able to put one car in the garage due to its small size. Chair Parisi closed the public hearing. MOTION: A motion was made by Member Kessler and seconded by Member Schannep to approve OV-10-08-05 a request to reduce the side -yard setback from 15 feet to 10 feet. DISCUSSION: Member Keesler stated that she went through the criteria and she felt that the large tree was a special circumstance on the property. She stated that if the tree was not there, the owner might be able to re -position the garage. She stated that due to the topography of the surroundings, that the circumstances were not created by the owner and in looking around the neighborhood, the house warrants a two car garage. She stated that the request was not detrimental to anyone in the area so she felt that the criteria had been met. Member Schannep stated that the Board has been very understanding in 06/13/08 Board of Adjustment, Special Session W tes 6 allowing homeowners to build or install amenities in order to enjoy and have the same property rights as the surrounding neighbors. However, this property owner already has a garage although it is undersized. He stated that the property owner bought the home and now he wants to build a bigger garage. He said that he felt that instead of taking the existing structure and widening it and making it higher, that it was all about the views. Member Schannep stated that the building was already there so he was opposed to granting the variance with the belief that the existing structure could be modified staying in the 15 foot setback and yet still keeping the tree. Chair Parisi stated that the project looks terrific but it is not in the 15 foot setback. He stated that there were other ways to modify the design of the garage and stay in the required setback and still enjoy their property. MOTION failed, 1-2 with Member Parisi and Member Schannep opposed. MOTION: A motion was made by Member Schannep and seconded by Member Parisi to deny OV-10-08-05. MOTION carried, 2-1 with Member Kessler opposed. 3. Planning and Zoning Update - No report. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: A motion was made by Member Kessler and seconded by Member Schannep to adjourn at 3:56 p.m. MOTION carried, 3-0. Prepared by: Roxana Garrity, CIVIC Deputy Town Clerk ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT REPORT CASE NO: OV 10-08-07 Hearing Date: Agenda Item No. Prepared By: REQUEST: July 22, 2008 2 Patty Hayes, Zoning Inspector Ventana Medical Systems requests a variance from the allowed 36' building height to 47'6". Subject parcel #219-20-8170, located at 1910 E. Innovation Park Drive, Oro Valley, AZ, 85737. REQUEST SPECIFICS: Ventana Medical Systems is remodeling the interior of existing building #2 on their campus from office space to laboratory. The remodeling will require the addition of large rooftop air conditioning and venting units. The Oro Valley Zoning Code's design guidelines encourage screening of mechanical equipment. Screening of mechanical equipment on commercially zoned properties is also required by the Rancho Vistoso Homeowner's association. The applicant has designed a screen wall around the new equipment that complies with the screening requirements. The proposed screening increases the overall building height to 47'6". The allowed building height in the Rancho Vistoso PAD CPI zone is 36'. SITE LOCATION: This property is located on Innovation Park Drive, 3/4 of a mile north of Tangerine Road. NOTIFICATION: All property owners within 300 feet of this property were notified of this hearing by mail. The property is posted with a notice of hearing, posted online at www.orovalle_yaz.gov and was advertised in the Daily Territorial. At the time of this report preparation, staff had received no comment in support or opposition to this case. EXISTING LAND USE AND ZONING: Site: Subject property — Existing technologic park zoned Rancho Vistoso (RV) PAD CPI North - Existing Western Parks and Monument building zoned RV PAD CPI West - Existing parking lot for Ventana Medical zoned RV PAD CPI East - Vacant property zoned RVopen space South - Vacant property zoned RV open space and recreation s SITE INFORMATION: Ventana Medical Systems is a 19.59 acre office/warehouse/light manufacturing facility developed in Oro Valley in 2000. Three buildings with a total of 182,400 square feet were subsequently built. The property has recently undergone an expansion adding 134,500 square feet. SUMMARY: Finding of Facts: • Building 2 is located 350' away from the Innovation Park Drive right-of-way. • The OVZCR, addendum A, design guidelines state mechanical equipment should be screened from public view. • The subject property is located with the Rancho Vistoso homeowner's association and must comply with their screening requirements. • The applicants' proposed screen wall will conceal the new rooftop equipment required for the interior expansion. • Mechanical equipment is defined by the OVZCR, section 31 as devices, appliances and apparatus involved in the maintenance of environmental conditions within a building. • Screen is defined by the OVZCR section 31 as an opaque barrier designed and installed to conceal areas used for storage, refuse, mechanical equipment, etc. • The campus park industrial zoning does not have a 10' height allowance for architectural features as is allowed with the other commercial zones. • The Sanofi Aventis building currently under construction north of this project was inadvertently approved with the building and mechanical equipment screening at 46' in height. • The current buildings on the site at Ventana are built to the maximum building height of 36'. Any additional walls built to screen the roof top equipment would exceed the allowed 36'. • The proposed 12' of roof top equipment itself is not considered part of the building height but the required screening is considered part of the overall height. • The submitted site plan and elevations have been highlighted in yellow to delineate the area of the proposed screen walls. • The proposed screen walls will be painted to match the building. The Board of Adjustment should consider the following findings in making its decision: A. That there are special circumstances or conditions applying to the property referred to in the application including its size, shape, topography, location or surroundings which do not apply to other properties in the district; and B. That special circumstances were not created by the owner or applicant; and C. That the authorizing of the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights; and 2 D. That any variance granted imposes such conditions as will assure that the authorizing of the adjustment shall not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which such property is located; and E. That the authorizing of the variance will not be materially detrimental to persons residing in the vicinity, to adjacent property, to the neighborhood or the public welfare in general. SUGGESTED MOTION: The Board may wish to consider the following motions: I move to [approve, approve with conditions, or deny] OV 10-08-07, a request to increase the building height from 36' to 47'6". ATTACHMENTS: 1. BOA application 2. Location map 3. Ariel photo F:\OV\OV10\2007\10-08-07\REPORT.doc Planning and Zoning Director rti oQ�JP`EY 4 q/��9 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION 11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE, ORO VALLEY AZ 85737 Phone: (520) 2294800 Fax: (520) 742-1022 D�NDED j9�a BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION FOR: x Zoning Variance _ Zoning Interpretation _ Appeal of Administrative Decision Note: Submittals are due by noon CASE NO.: NATURE OF REOUEST:Ventana Medical Systems is currently growing and expanding its facility Within the next month they will be moving into new office spaces in the newly completed construction on campus. Once this move has taken place, Building #2 is going to be renovated to create new Research & Development space for Ventana's continued growth. As a portion of this expansion there will be roof mounted equipment on Building #2. (See attached)This equipment will be Heating, Ventilation, Air Conditioning Equipment, boilers with related stacks, exhaust fans, and chillers. This equipment must be screened per Oro Valley Panning and Zoning code and we need to go to heights from 42' to 47'6" for these screen walls. APPLICANT: Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. A member of the Roche Group. PHONE: 520.229.3780 FAX: 520.229.4221 ADDRESS: 1910 E Innovation Park Drive, Oro Valley, AZ 85737 OWNER: Roche Diagnostics ADDRESS:1910 E. Innovation Park Drive, Oro Valley, AZ 85737 Southeast corner of Innovation Park Drive PROPERTY LOCATION FOR VARIANCE REQUEST: and Vistoso Village Boulevard PARCEL #: CURRENT ZONING: CPI ATTACHMENTS: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: APPLICABLE FEE: SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT (ALSO PRINT NAME) DATE 1 SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONS FOR APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE Please provide the following information addressing 1 — 5 in the Findings from Section 21.6 I of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised (OVZCR). In order to authorize a variance request, the Board will be searching for sufficient evidence in accordance with the findings. Please answer the questions below in a narrative format. 1. Are there special circumstances or conditions applying to the property referred to in the application including its size, shape, topography, location or surroundings which do not apply to other properties in the district? The CPI zoning for the property does not address screen wall heights and existing screen wall heights on Building #2 Expansion has been approved to 361. 2. Are there special circumstances that exist that are not self imposed or created by the owner/applicant? The screen wall height as requested is intended to meet the intent of Oro Valley code and conceal all roof mounted equipment. 3. Is the authorizing of the variance necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights? Ventana Medical Systems is expanding their Research and Development departments to stay a competitive company, to grow and to expand their business. 4. If granted, will the variance impose such conditions as will assure that the authorizing of the adjustment shall not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which such property is located? Other properties in the neighborhood are built to a height of 45, for their screen wall heights. 5. If granted, will the variance be the minimum necessary to afford relief and will not materially affect the health, safety, and welfare of the neighborhood or surrounding properties. The Hacign is wnrkinq to make this screen wall height as short as possible and still meet the code requirements for concealment of roof top equipment. 2 •:x={ a � `� !� mom' ! �,.,r"�; .r ti r AN JQe: 11 %xf i�+. tmry/�,".T(�'�• a ' ��_, ' t�+s � • \ * SIN r'` q��; `'� ` a .,r`.v �. Ii /•Fj. v�S '-cam ' r / -// ` z �,. Y r * - �� �� : "/►� yl • / •� i v `� F- /�.- a yil� � I�- hj •. i .... t Ar Al dL � ,a,� ' �" .. �. + � � - , '� �:. .:,►fir �a.4'".+�, •' .'w.'Y+'_ �.o�. , �' li t....� \�. + �rA ,�i�._.. ia.�`';' 7+•7�+?.M~.'fik' :rf�'/i'�',`�4`.ii..,f re p^rJdf' h A • f f�'F� • +. d Ar *. R �"` � d • 3 'ireAI ,�G, 'rAir.Wwl b i{� A� r r f �r PAGE 14 The Daily Territorial JULY 2, 2008 NOTICE OF HEARING IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PIMA JUVENILE COURT In the Matter of SEBRING, Hanna dob: 4/27/97 No. J-181466 NOTICE OF PUBLICATION HEARING ON MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF PERMA- NENT GUARDIAN OF MINOR CHILD Judge Charles Sabalos TO: David Beckham John Doe 1. The Arizona Department of Economic Security has filed a Motion for Appoint- ment of Permanent Guardian for the mi- nor child pursuant to A.R.S. § 8-871, at OQ• 2. The Court has set an initial hearing on the 12th day of August 2008, at 3:30 p.m. before the Honorable Charles Sa- balos at the Pima County Superior Court, Juvenile Division, 2225 E. Ajo Way, Tucson, Arizona 85713, telephone No. 740-2000, for the purpose of deter- mining the parents' response to the Mo- tion. 3. You are hereby advised that your fail- ure to personally appear in court without good cause shown may result in a find- ing that you have waived your legal rights and have admitted the allegations in the petition. In addition, if you fail to personally appear in court without good cause shown, the hearings may go for- ward in your absence and may result in the establishment of a permanent guardianship based upon the record and the evidence presented to the court. 4. You are hereby notified that upon a request or motion of a parent, guardian or Indian custodian of a child who is subject of these proceedings, made prior to any proceeding in this matter, the Court shall order that the proceed- ing is open to the public, unless the court finds good cause for all or part of the proceedings to remained closed. Before opening a proceeding to the public, the Court shall consider: (1) whether doing so is in the child's best interest; (2) whether doing so would en- danger the child's physical or emotional well-being or the safety of any other person; (3) the privacy rights of the child, the child's siblings, parents, guardians and caregivers and any other person whose privacy rights the Court determines need protection; (4) whether all parties have agreed to allow the pro- ceeding to be open. 5. In the event that you personally ap- pear and contest the allegations, the Court shall set a date for the trial on the permanent guardianship. 6. Requests for reasonable accommow dations for persons with disabilities must be made to the court by parties at least three (3) working days in advance of a scheduled court proceeding by call- ing (520) 740-2000. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this day of June, 2008. TERRY GODDARD Attorney General CAROLINE S. FURMAN Assistant Attorney General PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial July 2, 9,16, 23, 2008 hrsebring/181466 jh NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given to the residents and taxpayers of Arizona, that the Gov- eming Board of Ha:san Middle School will hold a meeting to ADOPT A PRO- POSED SCHOOL BUDGET for the 2008-09 fiscal year. In accordance with school law, this hearing will be held at 1333 E. 10th Street Tucson at 6:30pm on July 2, 2008. PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial July 2, 2008 hrha:sanmid/2008-09 tj NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given to the residents and taxpayers of Arizona, that the Gov- eming Board of Hassan Preparatory & Leadership School will hold a meeting to ADOPT A PROPOSED SCHOOL BUDGET for the 2008-09 fiscal year. In accordance with school law, this hear- ing will be held at 1333 E. 10th Street Tucson at 6:30pm on July 2, 2008. PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial July 2, 2008 hrha:sanprep/2008-09 tj NOTICE OF HEARING IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PIMA JUVENILE COURT In the Matter of HOLLIMAN, LULU LY- NELL dob 12/24/95 HOLLIMAN, PEARL (aka PHOENICIA HOLLIMAN) dob 07/09/98 No. J187155 CITATION NOTICE OF HEARING (Publication) Judge Kelly Person(s) under the age of 18 years TO: ROBYN HILL Address unknown PATRICK LEONARD HOLLIMAN (al- leged father) Address unknown JOHN DOE (alleged father) Address unknown The Arizona Department of Economic Security has filed a Dependency Peti- tion in the above -entitled cause alleging the above -named child to be dependent within the meaning of A.R.S. §8-201, et sea., as amended. YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that a publication hearing on the Petition is set for the 3rsd day of September, 2008, at 8:30 A.M., in the courtroom of this Court located at 2225 East Ajo Way, Tucson, Arizona. You may appear at the hearing and be rep- resented by counsel. The Court will ap- point counsel upon a showing of lack of financial ability to retain your own coun- sel. Warning: Your failure to appear at these hearings and to actively par- ticipate in these court proceedings and in the case plan may result in the child being adjudicated dependent with continued commitment to the care, custody and control of the Ari- zona Department of Economic Secu- rity and could result in further pro- ceedings for permanent guardian- ship pursuant to A.R.S. §§8-871 and 8-872 or terminajion of your parental rights pursuant to A.R.S. §§8-862(D), 8.863 and 8-533, at seq. The above -named individual(s) may obtain a copy of the Dependency Petition, Notice of Dependency Hearing, and Tempo- rary Order by submitting a written re- quest to: CAREY S. TURNER, Office of the Attorney General, 3939 South Park Avenue, Suite 180, Tucson, Ari- zona 85714. The assigned case man- ager is Alexis Montiel-Kirkendall and may be reached by telephone at (520)721-3097. A request for reason- able accommodation for persons with disabilities must be made to the Court by parties at least three (3) working days in advance of a scheduled court proceeding and can be made by calling 740-2900. PATRICIA A. NOLAND, Clerk Deputy Clerk GIVEN UN- DER MY HAND AND SEAL this day of June, 2008. #232049 PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial July 2, 9, 16, 23, 2008 trholliman/187155 jh 'NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORETHE ORO VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT In accordance with Sec. 21.6.1-1 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised and Arizona Revised Statutes Sec. 9-462.06, - NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Oro Valley Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, July 22, 2008 commencing at or after 3:00 p.m. The meeting will be held at the Oro Valley Town Hall, 11000 N. La Canada Drive and the subject matter will be as further described below: OV10-08-06: Lorne and Marilyn Brown requests a variance from the required 15' rear yard setback to 10'. Subject parcel #224-27-158E. located at 11026 N. Guava Drive . Oro Valley, AZ.85737. Site plans are available for review dur- ing normal business hours at the Oro Valley Town Hall, Development Service Center. Persons interested may appear -in person, by agent or attorney, and the petitioners must appear or be repre- sented. Any person seeking further in- formation on this request for a variance may contact Patty Hayes at 229-4819 or e-mail: phayesQorovalleyazTaov. REQ: Sarah More, FAICP Planning and Zoning Director PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial July 2, 2008 hrov10-08-06 hp NOTICE OF HEARING REGARDING Petition for Guardianship of a Minor Case No: JG 501973 SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY In the Matter of The Guardianship of IYZAYA SOTO A Minor Read this Notice Carefully. An impor- tant court proceeding that affects your rights has been scheduled. If you do not understand this notice, contact a lawyer for help. 1. NOTICE IS GIVEN that the Petitioner has filed with the Court a Petition for Guardianship of a Minor 2. HEARING INFORMATION. A court hearing has been scheduled to consider the Petition as follows: HEARING DATE AND TIME: 10/6/08 at 9:30 AM HEARING PLACE: 1810 South Lewis Street, Mesa, Arizona 85210 HEARING OFFICER: COMMISSIONER THOMAS A. KAIPIO 3. Fingerprints must be submitted to the Juvenile Clerk of the Court within (5) five days of the filing of the petition. 4. RESPONSE. You can file a written response to the Petition. File your origi- nal written response with the court, mail a copy of the original response to the petitioner(s), and provide a copy of your response to the Judge/Commissioner named above at least 5 business days before the hearing. Or, you can appear in person at the hearing. You must ap- pear at the hearing only if you wish to object to the petition. DATED: 6-30.08 CNS-1378265# PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial July 2, 9, 16, 2008 hrsoto/1378265 jh NOTICE OF HEARING IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PIMA JUVENILE COURT In the Matter of MARTINEZ, DOMI- NIQUE dob 04/27/07 Person(s) under the age of 18 years No. J184926 Sub- stituted CITATION NOTICE OF HEAR- ING (Publication) Judge Chandler TO: John Doe (Alleged father) Address unknown The Arizona Department of Economic Security has filed a Dependency Peti- tion in the above -entitled cause alleging the above -named child to be dependent within the meaning of A.R.S. §8-201, at sea., as amended. YOU ARE HEREBY NYELA dob 01/09/07 Person(s) under the age of 18 years No. J187158 CITA- TION NOTICE OF HEARING (Publica- tion) Judge Knuck TO: Scott Sanchez (Alleged father) Ad- dress Unknown John Doe (Alleged fa- ther) Address Unknown The Arizona Department of Economic Security has filed a Dependency Peti- tion in the above -entitled cause alleging the above -named child to be dependent within the meaning of A.R.S. §8.20I, Pt sea., as amended. YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that a publication hearing on the Petition is set for August 27, 2008, at 8:30 A.M., in the courtroom of this Court located at 2225 East Ajo Way, Tucson, Arizona. You may appear at the hearing and be represented by counsel. The Court will appoint counsel upon a showing of lack of financial abil- ity to retain your own counsel. Warn- ing: Your failure to appear at these hearings and to actively participate in these court proceedings and in the case plan may result in the child be- ing adjudicated dependent with con- tinued commitment to the care, cus- tody and control of the Arizona De- partment of Economic Security and could result in further proceedings for permanent guardianship pursu- ant to A.R.S. §§8-871 and B-872 or termination of your parental rights pursuant to A.R.S. §§8.862(D), 8-863 and 8-533, at seq. The above -named individual(s) may obtain a copy of the Dependency Petition, Notice of De- pendency Hearing, and Temporary Or- der by submitting a written request to: HERVEY A. HOTCHKISS, Office of the Attorney General, 3939 South Park Avenue, Suite 180, Tucson, Arizona 85714. The assigned case manager is MARY CARPENTER and may be reached by telephone at (520)740-1882. A request for reason- able accommodation for persons with disabilities must be made to the Court by parties at least three (3) working days in advance of a scheduled court proceeding and can be made by calling 740-2900. PATRICIA A. NOLAND, Clerk Deputy Clerk GIVEN UN- DER MY HAND AND SEAL this day of June, 2008. #235041 PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial July 2, 9, 16, 23, 2008 hrsanchez/187158 jh NOTIFIED that a publication hearing on NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING the Petition is set for the 27th day of BEFORE THE August, 2006, at 8:45 A.M., in the court- ORO VALLEY BOARD OF room of this Court located at 2225 East ADJUSTMENT Ajo Way, Tucson, Arizona. You may ap- In accordance with Sec. 21.6.H of the pear at the hearing and be represented Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised and by counsel. The Court will appoint coun- Arizona Revised Statutes Sec. sel upon a showing of lack of financial 9-462.06, ability to retain your own counsel. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Warning: Your failure to appear at Oro Valley Board of Adjustment will these hearings and to actively par- hold a public hearing on Tuesday, July ticipate in these court proceedings 22, 2008,commil!itLltig-st.pr after 3:00 and in the case plan may result in the child being adjudicated dependent p -T�a' meeting` be It Id at the r? Valley Town Hall, 1090 N. La with continued commitment to the Canda Drive and the sul ject matter care, custody and control of the Ark will be as further described b low: zone Department of Economic Secu- OV10-08-07: Ventana Me al S - rity and could result in further pro tems requests a variance gom the al- ceedings for permanent guardian lowed 36' building hat It to 47'6". ship pursuant to A.R.S. §§8-877 and Subject parcel #219-2JQLt170. located 8-872 or termination of your parental E. n Park Drive Oro rights pursuant to A:R.S. §§8-862(D), Valley. AZ. 85737. 8-863 and 8-533, at seq. The Site plans are available for review dur- above-named individual(s) may obtain a ing normal business hours at the Oro copy of the Dependency Petition, Notice Valley Town Hall, Development Service of Dependency Hearing, and Tempo- Center. Persons interested may appear rary Order by submitting a written re- in person, by agent or attorney, and the quest to: JASON D. CORLEY, Office of petitioners must appear or be repre- the Attorney General, 3939 South Park sented. Any person seeking further in - Avenue, Suite 180, Tucson, Arizona formation on this request for a variance 85714. The assigned case manager is may contact Patty Hayes at 229-4819 EVA PENA and may be reached by ore-mail:phaves@orovalleyaz.g9v. telephone at (520)721-3097. A request REQ: Sarah More, FAICP for reasonable accommodation for per- _ Planning and Zoning Director sons with disabilities must be made to PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial the Court by parties at least three (3) July 2, 2008 working days in advance of a scheduled hrov10-08-07 hp court proceeding and can be made by calling 740-2900. PATRICIA A. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE NOLAND, Clerk Deputy Clerk STATE OF ARIZONA GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PIMA this _ day of June, 2008. #234959 JUVENILE COURT PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial In the Matter of TATE, MICHAEL KA- July 2, 9, 16, 23, 2008 LEB dob 11/12/91 No. J176546 (RE- hrmartinez/184926 jh ACTIVATED) CITATION NOTICE OF NOTICE OF HEARING HEARING (Publication) Judge Adam IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE Person(s) under the age years STATE OF ARIZONA Rachel Wi k. . a.k.a. Tate Ad - IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PIMA dress Micenshael dress Unknown Michael Wagner Ad - JUVENILE COURT dress Unknown In the Matter of TELLO-SANCHEZ, NI- The Arizona Department of Economic Security has filed a Dependency Peti- tion in the above -entitled cause alleging the above -named child to be dependent within the meaning of A.R.S. §8-201, I<< sea., as amended. YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that a publication hearing on the Petition is set for the 20th day of August, 2008, at 4:00 P.M., in the courtroom of this Court located at 2225 East Ajo Way, Tucson, Arizona. You may appear at the hearing and be represented by counsel. The Court will appoint counsel upon a showing of lack of financial ability to retain your own counsel. Warning: Your failure to appear at these hearings and to actively par- ticipate in these court proceedings and in the case plan may result in the child being adjudicated dependent with continued commitment to the care, custody and control of the Ari- zona Department of Economic Secu- rity and could result in further pro- ceedings for permanent guardian- ship pursuant to A.R.S. §§8-871 and 6.872 or termination of your parental rights pursuant to A.R.S. §§8-862(D), 8.863 and 8-533, at seq. The above -named individual(s) may ob- tain a copy of the Dependency Petition, Notice of Dependency Hearing, and Temporary Order by submitting a writ- ten request to: THADDEUS SEMON, Office of the Attorney General, 3939 South Park Avenue, Suite 180, Tucson, Arizona 85714. The assigned case manager is Christine Chacon and may be reached by telephone at 740-1882. A request for reasonable accommoda- tion for persons with disabilities must be made to the Court by parties at least three (3) working days in advance of a scheduled court proceeding and can be made by calling 740.2900. PATRICIA A. NOLAND, Clerk Deputy Clerk GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL this_ day of June, 2008. Hb#233880 PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial July 2, 9, 16, 23, 2008 hrtate/176546 hp NOTICE OF HEARING Carrie Donahue Confidential IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PIMA JUVENILE COURT. In the Matter of: Damian Atwood dob //r 22/96 Case Number S186987 CITA- TION NOTICE OF HEARING TO: Kenneth Lee Atwood The Petitioner has filed a Petition to Terminate Parent -Child Relationship in the above -entitled cause requesting the court to terminate your parental rights to the above named child(ren), pursuant to A.R.S. §8-833 as amended. YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that an initial hearing on the Petition is set for Aueust 21, 2008, at 9:20 a.m., in the courtroom of this Court located at 2225 East Ajo Way, Tucson, Arizona before the Honorable Joan Wagener. You may appear at the hearing and be represented by counsel. The Court will appoint counsel; upon a showing of lack of financial ability to retain your own counsel. You are hereby advised hat your failure to personally appear in court without good cause shown may result in a find- ing that you have waived your legal rights and have admitted the allegations in the petition. In addition, if you fail to personally appear in court without good cause shown, the hearings may go for- ward in your absence and may result in a termination of your parental rights based upon the record and the evi- dence presented to the court. A request for reasonable accommoda- tion for persons with disabilities must be made to the Court by parties at least three (3) working days in advance of a scheduled court proceeding and can be made by calling (520) 740-2900. PATRICIA A. NOLAND, Clerk /s/ Dep- uty Clerk. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL this 3rd day of June, 2008. SUPERIOR COURT SEAL. COPY, JUN 3, 2008, PATRICIA A NOLAND, CLERK, SUPERIOR COURT PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial June 11, 18, 25, July 2, 2008 hratwood/186987 hp NOTICE OF HEARING IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PIMA JUVENILE COURT In the Matter of KANNEH,. MARY FINDA (A.K.A. FINDA CONTEH) dob 03/03/97 No. J177566 CITATION NO- TICE OF HEARING (Publication) Judge Eikleberry Person(s) under the age of 18 years TO: MARY KANNEH (presumed mother) Address Unknown JANE DOE (alleged mother) Address Unknown NOMOH KANNEH (alleged father) Ad- dress unknown JOHN DOE (alleged fa- ther) Address unknown The Arizona Department of Economic Security has filed a Dependency Peti- tion in the above -entitled cause alleging the above -named child to be dependent within the meaning of A.R.S. §8-201, at sag., as amended. YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that a publication hearing on the Petition is set for the 27th day of August, 2008, at 8.45 A.M., in the courtroom of this Court located at 2225 East Ajo Way, Tucson, Arizona. You may appear at the hearing and be represented by counsel. The Court will appoint counsel upon a showing of lack of financial ability to retain your own counsel. Warning: Your failure to appear at these hearings and to actively par- ticipate in these court proceedings and in the case plan may result in the child being adjudicated dependent with continued commitment to the care, custody and control of the Ari- zona Department of Economic Secu- rity and could result in further pro- ceedings for permanent guardian- ship pursuant to A.R.S. §§8-871 and 8-872 or termination of your parental rights pursuant to A.R.S. §§8-862(D), 8-863 and 8-533, at seq. The above -named individual(s) may ob- tain a copy of the Dependency Petition, Notice of Dependency Hearing, and Temporary Order by submitting a writ- ten request to: DAVID N. HOWARTH, Office of the Attorney General, 3939 South Park Avenue, Suite 180, Tucson, Arizona 65714. The assigned case manager is Sarah Case and may be reached by telephone at (520) 721-3097. A request for reasonable accommoda- tion for persons with disabilities must be made to the Court by parties at least three (3) working days in advance of a scheduled court proceeding and can be made by calling 740-2900. PATRICIA A. NOLAND, Clerk Deputy Clerk GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL this_ day of June, 2008. #233939 PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial July 2, 9, 16, 23, 2008 hrkanneh/177568 hp NOTICE OF HEARING Rachel Elizabeth Jimenez 6952 E 42nd St Tuc AZ 85730 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PIMA In re the Name Change of: Deanna Marie Williams-Garn Petitioner. Rachel Elizabeth Jimenez CASE NO. C20083863 NOTICE OF HEARING ON PETITION FOR CHANGE OF NAME TO: Dean Garn PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the above named petitioner has petitioned this Court pursuant to A.R.S §§ 12-601 and 12-602 for a Change of Name to: Deanna Made Jimenez Objections to the requested Change of Name must be made with the above named court on or before the hearing scheduled for 10= A.M. ,the 18 day of &1y, 2008 before the following Judge or Court commis- sioner: Superior Court. 110 West Con- gress. Tucson. AZ 85701. You may ap- pear in person or by your Attorney at the Scheduled Hearing. A copy of the Petition for Change of Name is attached hereto for your reference. /a/ (Peti- tioner's Signature) 6952 E. 42nd St Tuc- son Az 85730 FILED 08 JUN-6 AM11:15 PATRICIA A. NOLAND CLERK, SUPERIOR COURT BY/s/ DEPUTY PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial June 11, 18, 25, July 2. 2008 hrwilliamsgarn/c20083863 mm JULY 2, 2008 The Daily Territorial PAGE 13 COMMISSION FOR I. Name: 3438/3444 CC, LLC L-1459088-6 II. The address of the known place of business is: 6061 E. Grant Road. #121 Tucson. AZ 85712 III. The name and street address of Statutory Agent is: Michael J. Naifeh 6061 E. Grand Road. #121 Tucson, AZ 85712 B. [x] Management of the limited liability company is reserved to the members. The names and addresses of each per- son who is a member are: [x] member [x] manager Michael J. Naifeh 6061 E. Grand Road #121 Tucson AZ 85712 PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial June 30; July 1, 2, 2008 ai3438/3444 if AMENDMENT OF ARTICLES OF ORGANIZATION OF MAGNUSON & ASSOCIATES, L.L.C. Pursuant to A.R.S. § 29-633, the under- signed states as follows: 1. The name of the limited liability com- pany is: MAGNUSON & ASSOCIATES, L.L.C. 2. The Arizona Corporation Commission filing number is L-1146712-5. 3. The date the initial Articles of Organi- zation were filed is: August 9, 2004. 4. The amendment to the Articles of Organization is as follows: The name of the limited liability company is being changed . Accordingly, the name of the limited liability company as set forth in the original Articles of Organization is stricken in its entirety, and the new name of the limited liability company is RAYMAG, L.L.C. DATED this 9th day of June, 2008. MEMBER By: /s/ Ray Magnuson, Member AZ CORPORA- TION COMMISSION FILED JUNE 9 2008 FILE NO. L-1146712-5 PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial July 1, 2, 31 2008 aimagnuson/amend tj Articles Of Organization Of SP Tucson, LLC In connection with the formation of the limited liability company named herein, and pursuant to A.R.S. § 29-632 the un- dersigned states as follows: 1. The name of the limited liability company is: SP Tucson, LLC, an Arizona limited li- ability company. 2. The address of the registered office in Arizona of the limited liability company is: C/O Hinderaker & Rauh, PLC, 2401 E. Speedway Blvd., Tucson, Arizona 85719. 3. The name and address of the limited liability com- pany's statutory agent for service of process is: Ted H. Hinderaker, 2401 East Speedway Blvd., Tucson, Arizona 85719. 4. The sole initial member who owns a twenty percent (20%) or greater interest in the Company at the time of formation is: Ann O'Neill Marymor, as Trustee of the O'Neill Family Trust dated April 15, 1991, as amended and restated February 19, 2008, 7 Oak For- est Road, Novato, California 94949. 5. Management of the limited liability com- pany is vested in a Manager. The name and address of the manager at the time of formation of the limited liability com- pany is Rodman J. Marymor, 7 Oak Forest Road, Novato, California 94949. Dated this 6 day of June, 2008. /s/ Rod- man J. Marymor, Organizer Consent Of Statutory Agent Ted H. Hinderaker, having been designated to act as Statu- tory Agent for SP Tucson, LLC, an Ari- zona limited liability company, hereby consents to act in that capacity until re- moved or his resignation is submitted in accordance with the Arizona Revised Statutes. /s/ Ted H. Hinderaker Hin- deraker & Rauh, PLC 2401 E. Speed- way Blvd. Tucson, Arizona 85719 PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial June 30, July 1, 21 2008 alsptucson jh ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF Pursuant to A.R.S.§10-202 (An Arizona Business Corporation) 1. Name: The name of the Corpora- tion is Sonora Development Inc.. 2. Initial Business: The Corporation Initially intends to conduct the busi- ness of Management Company 3. Authorized Capital: The Corpora- tion shall have authority to issue 1000 shares of Common Stock. 4. Known Place of Business: (In Ari- zona) The street address of the known place of business of the Cor- poration is: 7015 E 21 Street Tucson, Arizona 85710 5. Statutory Agent: (In Arizona) The name and address of the statutory agent of the Corporation is: John Musselman 7015 E. 21 Street Tucson, Arizona 85710 6. Board of Directors: The initial board of directors shall consist of 3 director(s). The name(s) and ad- dresses) of the person(s) who is(are) to serve as the director(s) un- til the first annual meeting of share- holders or until his(her)(their) suc- cessor(s) is(are) elected and quali- fies ts(are): John Musselman 7015 E. 21 Street Tucson, Arizona 85710 Ca- sey Musselman 7015 E. 21 Street Tuc- son. Arizona 85710 Gwen Musselman 7015 E. 21 Street Tucson Arizona 85710 The number of persons to serve on the board of directors there- after shall be fixed by the Bylaws. 7. Incorporators: The name(s) and address(es) of the incorporator(s) is (are): John Musselman 7015 E. 21 Street Tucson, Arizona 85710 All pow- ers, duties and responsibilities of the incorporators shall cease at the time of delivery of these Articles of Incor- poration to the Arizona Corporation Commission. 8. Indemnification of Officers. Direc- tors. Employees and Agents: The Corporation shall indemnify any per- son who incurs expenses or liabili- ties by reason of the fact he or she is or was an officer, director, employee or agent of the Corporation or is or was serving at the request of the Corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another Corpo- ration, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise. This indem- nification shall be mandatory in all circumstances in which indemnifica- tion is permitted by law. 9. Limitation of Liability: To the full- est extent permitted by the Arizona Revised Statutes, as the same exists or may hereafter be amended, a di- rector of the Corporation shall not be liable to the Corporation or its stock- holders for monetary damages for any action taken or any failure to take any action as a director. No re- peal, amendment or modification of this article, whether direct or indi- rect, shall eliminate or reduce its ef- fect with respect to any act or omis- sion of a director of the Corporation occurring prior to such repeal, amendment or modification. Executed this 29 day of November, 07 by all of the incorporators. /s/ John Musselman PHONE FAX Acceptance of Appoint- ment By Statutory Agent The under- signed hereby acknowledges and ac- cepts the appointment as statutory agent of the above -named corpora- tion effective this 22 day of Nov m er, 07. /s/ John Musselman AZ CORPO- RATION COMMISSION FILED DEC 12 2007 FILE NO.-1414566-8 PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial June 30; July 1, 2, 2008 aisonoradevelopment tj Notice Of Publication Articles Of Organization Have Been Filed In The Office Of The Arizona Cor- poration Commission For I Name: En- compus Heating And Cooling, LLC. L-14-56534-6. II The address of regis- tered office is: Highway 86 Rt 19, Sells AZ 85634. The name and address of the Statutory Agent is: George Nmn Ackerman Sr., Highway 86 Rt 19, Sells AZ 85634. III Management of limited li- ability company is reserved to the mem- bers. The names and addresses of each person who is a member are: George Nmn Ackerman Sr., P O Box 863, Sells AZ 85634, member. PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial June 30, July 1, 2, 2008 aiencompus jh ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF Pursuant to A.R.S.§10-202 (An Arizona Business Corporation) 1. Name: The name of the Corpora- tion is Sonora Entemrises Group Inc.. 2. Initial Business: The Corporation Initially intends to conduct the busi- ness of Equipment Leasing Company 3. Authorized Capital: The Corpora- tion shall have authority to issue 1000 shares of Common Stock. 4. Known Place of Business: (In Ari- zona) The street address of the known place of business of the Cor- poration is: 7015 E 21 Street Tucson, Arizona 85710 5. Statutory Agent: (In Arizona) The name and address of the statutory agent of the Corporation is: John Musselman 7015 E. 21 Street Tucson, Arizona 85710 6. Board of Directors: The initial board of directors shall consist of $ director(s). The name(s) and ad- dress(es) of the person(s) who is(are) to serve as the director(s) un- til the first annual meeting of share- holders or until his(her)(their) suc- cessor(s) is(are) elected and quali- fies is(are): John Musselman 7015 E. 21 Street Tucson, Arizona 85710 Ca- sey Musselman 7015 E. 21 Street Tuc- son, Arizona 85710 Gwen Musselman 7015 E. 21 Street Tucson, Arizona 85710The number of persons to serve on the board of directors there- after shall be fixed by the Bylaws. 7. Incorporators: The names) and address(es) of the incorporator(s) is (are): John Musselman 7015 E. 21 Street Tucson Arizona 85710 All pow- ers, duties and responsibilities of the incorporators shall cease at the time of delivery of these Articles of Incor- poration to the Arizona Corporation Commission. S. Indemnification of Officers. Direc- tors. Employees and Agents: The Corporation shall indemnity any per- son who incurs expenses or liabili- ties by reason of the fact he or she is or was an officer, director, employee or agent of the Corporation or is or was serving at the request of the Corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another Corpo- ration, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise. This indem- nification shall be mandatory in all circumstances in which indemnifica- tion is permitted by law. 9. Limitation of Liability: To the full- est extent permitted by the Arizona Revised Statutes, as the same exists or may hereafter be amended, a di- rector of the Corporation shall not be liable to the Corporation or its stock- holders for monetary damages for any action taken or any failure to take any action as a director. No re- peal, amendment or modification of this article, whether direct or indi- rect, shall eliminate or reduce its ef- fect with respect to any act or omis- sion of a director of the Corporation occurring prior to such repeal, amendment or modification. Executed this 20 day of November, 07 by all of the incorporators. /s/ John Musselman PHONE FAX Acceptance of Appoint- ment By Statutory Agent The under- signed hereby acknowledges and ac- cepts the appointment as statutory agent of the above -named corpora- tion effective this 29 day of November, Q7. /,1 John Musselman AZ CORPO- RATION COMMISSION FILED DEC 12 2007 FILE NO. 14145657 PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial June 30; July 1, 2, 2008 aisonoraenterprises tj NOTICE TO CREDITORS IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PIMA In the Matter of the Estate of CHRISTO- PHER D. BURDON, Deceased NO. PB 20080675 NOTICE TO CREDITORS NOTICE IS GIVEN that THOMAS E. BURDON has been appointed Personal Representative of this estate. All per- sons having claims against the estate are required to present their claims within four months after the date of the first publication of this Notice or the claims will be forever barred. Claims must be presented by delivering or mail- ing a written statement of the claim to the Personal Representative or attorney at the address listed below. DATED: — /s/ Personal Representative. 2205 N Swan Tucson, AZ 85712 PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial June 25, July 2, 9, 2008 crburdon/20080675 jh NOTICE TO CREDITORS ARIZONA SUPERIOR COURT PIMA COUNTY In the Matter of the Estate of JOHN A. EDWARDS, Date of Birth: September 18, 1928 Deceased. No. PB 20080700 NOTICE TO CREDITORS NOTICE IS GIVEN that JOHN A. ED- WARDS, JR. has been appointed Per- sonal Representative of this estate. All persons having claims against the es- tate are required to present their claims within the time prescribed in A.R.S. 14-3803, or the claims will be forever barred. Claims must be presented by delivering or mailing a written statement of the claim to the Personal Represen- tative at the Law Offices of Thomas J. Davis, Attn: Gene, 5115 North Oracle Road, Tucson, Arizona 85704. DATED: June 27, 20 08./s/ JOHN A. ED- WARDS, JR. PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial July 2, 9, 16, 2008 credwards. hp Notice To Creditors Theodore M. Dembroski Richard S. Hudgins, Esq. PCC No. 27848 Slosser, Hudgins, Struse & Fre- und, P.L.C. 6750 North Oracle Road Tucson, Arizona 85704 (520) 575-5555 Attorneys for Personal Representative Superior Court Of Arizona, Pima County In the Matter of the Estate of: Theodore M. Dembroski Date of Birth: 09/15/1941, No. PB2008 0479 Notice To Creditors (For Publication) Notice is hereby given that Jim L. Shields has been appointed Personal Representa- tive of this Estate. All persons having claims against the Estate are required to present their claims within four months after the date of the first publi- cation of this notice, to those notified by publication, or within sixty days after mailing or other delivery of this notice, to those notified by mailing or other de- livery, whichever is later, or the claims will be forever barred. Claims must be presented by delivering or mailing a written statement of the claim to the Personal Representative, c/o Richard S. Hudgins, 6750 N. Oracle Road, Tucson, AZ 85704. Dated: 6/17/08. Slosser, Hudgins, Struse & Freund, P.L.C. By: /s/ Richard D. Hudgins, Esq. Attorneys for Personal Representative PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial July 2, 9, 16, 2008 crdembroski hp Notice To Creditors Carmen Noguerola, Timothy M. Struse, Esq. PCC No. 65648 Slosser, Hudgins, Struse & Freund, P.L.C. 6750 North Oracle Road Tucson, AZ 85704 (520) 575-5555 Attorneys for Personal Repre- sentative Superior Court Of Arizona, Pima County In the Matter of the Estate of: Carmen Noguerola, DOB: 5/14/1931 Deceased. No. PB 20080636 Notice To Creditors (For Publication) Notice is hereby given that Daphne Chavez has been appointed Personal Representa- tive of this Estate. All persons having claims against the Estate are required to present their claims within four months after the date of the first publi- cation of this notice, to those notified by publication, or within sixty days after mailing or other delivery of this notice, to those notified by mailing or other de- livery, whichever is later, or the claims will be forever barred. Claims must be presented by delivering or mailing a written statement of the claim to the Personal Representative, c/o Timothy M. Struse, 6750 N. Oracle Road, Tuc- son, AZ 85704. Dated: 6/4/08. Slosser, Hudgins, Struse & Freund, P.L.C. By: /s/ Timothy M. Struse, Esq. Attorneys for Personal Representative PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial June 18, 25, July 2, 2008 crnoguerola/20080636 hp Notice To Creditors T & N Lawrence Family Trust Villarreal Law Office P.C. Susan C. Vil- larreal 5405 North Oracle Road, Suite 101 Tucson, Arizona 85719-2032 Tele- phone: 520-784-0604 Facsimile: 520-784-0606 SBN: 014083 PCCN: 65425 Attorney for Successor Trustees Superior Court Of Arizona, Pima County In the Matter of the T & N Lawrence Family Trust Dated January 17, 2001 Amended: September 26, 2005 April 12, 2007; and April 8, 2008. Notice To Creditors (For Publication) Notice Is Hereby Given that Noreen Lucille Law- rence and Thurl Vaughn Lawrence, Trustors and original Trustees of the T & N Lawrence Family Trust dated Janu- ary 17, 2001, first amended on Septem- ber 26, 2005 and further amended on April 12, 2007 and April B. 2008. Noreen Lucille Lawrence died on Febru- ary 3, 2007. Thurl Vaughn Lawrence died on or about June 11, 2008. Linda Ellsworth-Mettie and Michael A. Law- rence succeeded as Successor Co -Trustees on June 11, 2008, All per- sons having claims against the trust es- tate are required to present their claims within the time prescribed in A.R.S. § 14-6103 (4 months) after the date of publication of this notice of the claims will be forever barred. Claims must be presented in writing to Linda Ellsworth-Mettie and Michael A. Law- rence, Successor Co -Trustees in care of: Villarreal Law Office, P.C., 5405 North Oracle Road, Suite 101, Tucson, Arizona 85704. Dated this 17th day of June, 2008. Linda Ellsworth- Mettie and Michael A. Lawrence, Successor Co -Trustees, T & N Lawrence Family Trust By /s/ Susan C. Villarreal Attorney for Successor Trustee PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial July 2, 9, 16, 2008 crt&n hp Notice To Creditors Marion Stitzgerald Bogutz & Gordon, P.C. 3503 N. Camp- bell, Suite 101 Tucson, Arizona 85719 (520) 321-9700 wal Benjamin J. Burn- side PCC # 64912 Attorney for Personal Representative Superior Court Of Ari- zona, Pima County In the Matter of the Estate of Marion Stitzgerald, (D.O.B. 10/09/19) Deceased. No. PB20080283 Notice To Creditors Notice Is Hereby Given that Bogutz & Gordon, P.C. has been appointed Personal Representa- tive of this Estate. All persons having claims against the Estate are required to present their claims within four months after the date of the first publi- cation of this notice or the claims will be forever barred. Claims must be pre- sented by delivering or mailing a written statement of the claim to the Personal Representative at: Bogutz & Gordon, P.C. Benjamin J. Burnside, Esq. 3503 N. Campbell Ave. Suite 101 Tucson, AZ 85719 Dated: June 11, 2008. Bogutz & Gordon, P.C. By: /s/ Benjamin J. Bum - side, Attorney for Personal Representa- tive PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial June 25, July 2, 9, 2008 crstitzgerald/20080283 jh NOTICE TO CREDITORS ARIZONA SUPERIOR COURT, PIMA COUNTY In the Matter of the Estate of: Mandus Richard Olson Deceased No. PB 20080365 NOTICE TO CREDITORS (For Publication) NOTICE IS GIVEN that Karla Pavek has been appointed Personal Repre- sentative of this estate. All persons hav- ing claims against the estate are re- quired to present their claims within four months after the date of the first publi- cation of this Notice or the claims will be forever barred. Claims must be pre- sented by delivering or mailing a written statement of the claim to the Personal Representative or attorney at the ad- dress listed below. DATED: 10 June 2008 /s/ Personal Representative/Atton- ery Karla Pavek 12964 Maple Knoll Way Maple Grove MN 55369 PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial June 18, 25; July 2, 2008 crolson/pb2008O365 tj NOTICE TO CREDITORS ARIZONA SUPERIOR COURT, PIMA COUNTY In the Matter of the Estate of: FRANK R. MORRIS, DOB: 11/2/26, Deceased. No. PB-20080652 NOTICE TO CREDI- TORS (For Publication) NOTICE IS GIVEN that JERRY MOR- RIS has been appointed Personal Rep- resentative of this estate. All persons having claims against the estate are re- quired to present their claims within four months after the date of the first publi- cation of this Notice or the claims will be forever barred. Claims must be pre- sented by delivering or mailing a written statement of the claim to the Personal Representative or attorney at the ad- dress listed below. DATED: June 16, 2008./s/ RUBIN SALTER, JR. Attorney for Estate 177 N. Church, Ste. 1000 Tucson, Arizona 85701 PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial June 18, 25; July 2, 2008 crmorris/20080652 tj Notice To Creditors Darlene Evelyn Olson, Victoria E. Blair Fleming & Curti, P.L.C. 330 N. Granada Ave Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 622-0400 Computer No. 65625 In The Superior Court Of The State Of Arizona In And For The County Of Pima In the Matter of the Estate of: Darlene Evelyn Olson DOB: July 16, 1924 Deceased. No. PB 20080639 Notice To Creditors Notice Is Given that Michael D. Olson has been appointed Personal Representative of this estate. All persons having claims against the estate are required to pre- sent their claims within four months af- ter the date of the first publication of this Notice or the claims will be forever barred. Claims must be presented by delivering or mailing a written statement of the claim to the Personal Represen- tative or attorney at the address listed below. Dated: June 3, 2008. /s/ Victoria E. Blair Victoria E. Blair Attorney for Personal Representative 330 N. Gra- nada Ave Tucson, AZ 85701 PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial June 18, 25, July 2, 2008 crolson/20080639 hp NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given to the residents and taxpayers of the state of Arizona, that the Governing Board of Chil- dren's Success Academy will hold a meeting for considera- tion of the ADOPTED SCHOOL BUDGET for the fiscal year 2008 - 2009. In accordance with school law, this hearing will be held at Children's Success Academy, 925 E. Bilby Rd., Tucson, AZ, on July 15, 2008, at 9:00 a.m. PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial July 2, 2008 hrbudget08/09 jh Dianna Rodriguez 1.09 E 30th St. Tucson. Arizona ARIZONA SUPERIOR COURT PIMA COUNTY In the Matter of: ISIDRO BENCOMO J Minor Date of Birth: 10/20/06 Case Number: GC20070855 NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS GIVEN that the Court will consider the Petition for Aoot. of Guard- ian of Minor on July 21, 2008 at the hour of 10:30 AM o'clock, at the Pima County Court Building, 110 W. Con- gress, Tucson, Arizona. DATED 06) /05/08 151 Petitioner YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR PRO- TECTING YOUR INTERESTS. This matter may not be independently investigated or verified by the court. If you object to any part of the petition, you must file a wr;tten objection with the court describing the legal basis of your objection. Failure to file a written objec- tion may jeopardize your interests. Without your written objection, you should expect the requested relief will be granted. If you question any other action of the fiduciary, file an appropri- ate written petition or motion with the court. This is a legal matter. If you have ques- tions, seek legal advice from an attor- ney. You have the right to represent yourself. If you represent yourself you must correctly follow court procedures. PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial June 18, 25, July 2, 2008 hrrodriguez/gc20070855 hp AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF ARIZONA '41-1 COUNTY OF PIMA Jamie Macias, being first duly sworn, deposes and says that (s)he is the Legal Advertising Manager of THE DAILY TERRITORIAL, a daily newspaper printed and published in the County of Pima, State of Arizona, and of general circulation in the City of Tucson, County of Pima, State of Arizona and elsewhere, and the hereto attached: NOTICE OF HEARING OV10-08-07 JULY 22, 2008 was printed and published correctly in the regular and entire issue of said THE DAILY TERRITORIAL for 1 issues; that was first made on the 2nd day of July 2008 and the last publication thereof was made on the 2nd day of July 2008 ; that said publication was made on each of the following dates, to -wit: 07/02/08 at the Request of: Oro Valley Town Hall 10181E !ONES c C - OC -Of Notary Public - A Low My commission expires: Pima County Expires 1110,108 _ NOTICE r'- PUBLIC HEARING IIIEFORE THE ORO VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT In accordance with Sec. 21.6.H of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised and Arizona Revised Statutes Sec. 9-462.06, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Oro Valley Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, July 22, 2008 commencing at or after 3:00 p.m. The meeting will be held at the Oro Valley Town Hall, 11000 N. La Canada Drive and the subject matter will be as further described below: OV10-08-07: Ventana Medical Sva- tems requests a variance from the al- lowed 36' building height to 47'6". Sub(ect parcel #219-20-8170, located at 1910 E. Innovation Park Drive. Oro Valley, AZ. 85737, Site plans are available for review dur- ing normal business hours at the Oro Valley Town Hall, Development Service Center. Persons interested may appear in person, by agent or attorney, and the petitioners must appear or be repre- sented. Any person seeking further in- formation on this request for a variance may contact Patty Hayes at 229-4819 or e-mail: phavesQorovalleyaz.aov. _REO: Sarah More, FAICP Planning and Zoning Director PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial July 2, 2008 hrov10-08-07 hp 0 0 Iz- 40 'Z -*07 a O� i 1- &04 lovzla�lv ISO 1 0.1 3NOIsa3NkVVH '39Dkql1A Oso.LStA C JIH.Ljj SPRING PIMA 4L .. 1,700M, - VIA ao, . COPF Ocs-PNIJ6 rn 0 aIJROPA 0 PEEP 0 O x LAg NRINTW T 0 0 j A 0 40 A I/Lj &M ') ­DVnA 0" X Yd, PIMA SPRING TIM"- PCI SVNVINOW Vjl , o , VId I 30 NOW .................. ............ m LU b 0 w COPF ui rn E'jj"o?x C05\0 rl SKyWIRE- Lp,SYRlKTWH > < o o 0O z ui I Wi& NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE ORO VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT In accordance with Sec. 21.6.14 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised and Arizona Revised Statutes Sec. 9-462.06, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Oro Valley Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, July 22, 2008 commencing at or after 3:00 p.m. The meeting will be held at the Oro Valley Town Hall, I1000 N. La Canada Drive and the subject matter will be as further described below: OV10-08-07: Ventana Medical Systems requests a variance from the allowed 36' building heitzht to 47'6". Subiect parcel #219-20-8170, located at 1910 E. Innovation Park Drive, Oro Valley, AZ, 85737. Site plans are available for review during normal business hours at the Oro Valley Town Hall, Development Service Center. Persons interested may appear in person, by agent or attorney, and the petitioners must appear or be represented. Any person seeking further information on this request for a variance may contact Patty Hayes at 229-4819 or e-mail: pha_ es c%orovalleyaz.gov. -IfEQ: Sarah More, FAICP Planning and Zoning Director Posted: By: Sg Date: 6-26-08 Time: 1: 3 0 p.m.