Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
OV1600907
DA &D2cq SOUTHWEST TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, LLC 13 July 2016 David Laws, PE Division Manager — Permitting Town of Oro Valley 11000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley, Arizona 85787 SUBJECT: CANYON DEL ORO BAPTIST CHURCH EGLESTON MEMORIAL DRIVE/CALLE CONCORDIA TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT Dear Mr. Laws: Please find enclosed a brief traffic impact statement (TIS) regarding the proposed expansion of the Canyon Del Oro Baptist Church located on the northeast coiner of Egleston Memorial Drive/Calle Concordia in Oro Valley, Arizona. The vicinity of the project is shown in Figure 1. The project will consist of the addition of 29,486 square - feet of worship and building space to the existing 14,266 square foot church as shown in Figure 2. Access to the project site is currently provided by three existing driveways. The purpose of this traffic impact statement is to estimate the traffic generation associated with the proposed building addition and outline the possible impacts of the project on the immediate project area and the existing access points that serve the project. In addition the potential queues will be calculated at each turn lane into the site to verify that there is adequate queue storage space. Existing Conditions Adjacent to the project site, Oracle Road is a six -lane roadway which provides three lanes in the northbound and southbound directions separated by a concrete median. Oracle Road provides regional access throughout the Tucson area and serves local residential and commercial developments. The posted speed limit on Oracle Road is 50 miles per hour (mph). Curb, gutter and roadway lighting facilities are not present along the roadway. Overhead power lines parallel the west side of the road. Calle Concordia borders the south side of the site and provides one lane in each direction. The roadway does not feature curb, gutter or roadway lighting. East of Oracle Road, Calle Concordia provides access to the Canyon Del Oro Baptist Church and several single family parcels. No access to nearby hiking trails is permitted via Calle Concordia. The posted speed limit on Calle Concordia is 25 mph. 3838 North Central Avenue Ste 1810 Phoenix, Arizona 85012 p 602.266.SvVTE (7983) f 602.266.1115 www.swte.us David Laws 13 July 2016 Page 2 Figure 1— Vicinity Map CANYON DEL ORO BAPTIST CHURCH PHASE 3 IMPROVEMENT PLAN 0 VXXXX-XX a PUSCH RIDGE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC 225-10-064B + CANYON DEL ORO BAPTIST CHURCH INC 225-10-064C 15.85 ACRES a 14 13 UNDA NSTA -+ 13 18 2 9 F _ L24 t CA LE CONCORDIA THIS PROJECT �....._..__........ 2394 ir..... 2419 2 LOCATION MAP A POR710N OF SEC77ON 24, T-12-S, R-13-E CILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, CITY OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA SCALE: Y-1 MILE l--- 7 : t SHADOW MOUNTAIN ESTATES EAST BK 14 M&P, PG 93 Figure 2 -Site Plan REF. CASE OV12-92-09 OV12-05-05 PERMIT SET EEC 7 David Laws 13 July 2016 Page 4 Egleston Memorial Drive is a two lane, private roadway that extends north from Calle Concordia parallel to Oracle Road, through the existing site, to Linda Vista Boulevard. The posted speed limit on Egleston Memorial Drive is 15 mph. Egleston Memorial Drive connects the Canyon Del Oro Baptist Church with the Pusch Ridge Christian Academy School located north of the church. Approximately midway between the Pusch Ridge Christian Academy and the Canyon Del Oro Baptist Church the North Access is a two lane roadway that connects Egleston Memorial Drive to Oracle Road. North Access has no posted speed limit and does not provide curb, gutter or sidewalk facilities. The North Access is located approximately 845 feet north of Calle Concordia. The East Access provides access into the project site from Calle Concordia via two-lane roadway approximately 575 feet east of the Oracle Road/Calle Concordia intersection. Riviera Drive extends south from Calle Concordia at the East Access. This local roadway provides access to the residential homes south of the site and provides one lane in each direction. Curb and gutter facilities are not present on Riviera Drive. The Oracle Road/Calle Concordia intersection is a four -leg, signalized intersection. Pedestrian ramps and crosswalks are provided on all four legs. The northbound and southbound approach to the intersection offer a left turn lane, three through lanes and a right turn lane. A shared left turn/through lane and a dedicated right turn lane are offered on the eastbound and westbound approaches to the intersection. Protected/permitted left turn phasing is provided for the northbound and southbound left turn movements. Serving the project site, the southbound left turn lane provides approximately 300 feet of storage space while the northbound right turn lane is 280 feet long at this intersection. The un-signalized, three -leg intersection of Egleston Memorial Drive/Calle Concordia serves as the primary access point into the existing Canyon Del Oro Church. The eastbound approach to the intersection maintains a shared left turn/through lane while the westbound approach allows a shared through/right turn lane. The southbound, approach to the intersection provides a shared left turn/right turn lane and is STOP sign controlled. The eastbound and westbound approaches to the intersection are free flow. The Egleston Memorial Drive/Calle Concordia intersection is located approximately 175 feet east of Oracle Road. The East Access/Calle Concordia intersection is a four -leg, un-signalized intersection. All four approaches to the intersection offer a shared left turn/through/right turn lane. The northbound leg is STOP controlled while southbound traffic must yield the right of way to eastbound and westbound traffic which are free flow. David Laws 13 July 2016 Page 5 A third access point, North Access, is provided on Oracle road approximately 845 feet north of the Oracle Road/Calle Concordia intersection. This three -leg intersection allows Oracle Road to operate under free flow conditions while the westbound approach is STOP controlled. The northbound leg offers three through lanes and a right turn lane at the intersection. Southbound traffic is offered three through lanes. The exiting, westbound traffic is restricted to a right turn lane only. Approximately 240 feet of storage space is provided for northbound right turning vehicles in the exclusive right turn lane. Ingress vehicles at the North Access make a northbound to eastbound right turn movement, continue east for approximately 100 feet, then make a right turn maneuver onto southbound Egleston Memorial Drive. The Egleston Memorial Drive/North Access intersection is an un-signalized, "T" intersection. The eastbound approach to the intersection provides a shared left turn/right turn lane and is uncontrolled. The northbound leg of the intersection offers a shared left turn/through lane while the southbound approach provides a shared through/right turn lane. Northbound and southbound Egleston Memorial Drive is STOP sign controlled at the intersection. Existing lane configurations and traffic control are shown in Figure 3. Trip Generation Trip generation for the project was developed utilizing nationally agreed upon data contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) publication Trip Generation, 9'h Edition, 2012. So as to provide analysis for the full build -out of the project, trip generation was estimated for the existing church as well as the additional building space based on ITE Land Use Code 560, Church. The result is the expected weekday and Sunday trip generation for the new Canyon Del Oro Baptist Church project, as shown in Table 1 and Table 2. The complete trip generation calculations can be found attached to this statement. Table 1 — Weekday Project Site Generated Trips Time Period Existing Church Proposed Church Total Trips with Addition Project Average Daily, Inbound (vtpd) 65 134 199 Average Daily, Outbound (vtpd) 65 134 199 Total Daily 130 268 398 AM Peak Hour, Inbound (vtph) 5 11 17 AM Peak Hour, Outbound (vtph) 3 6 9 Total AM Peak 8 17 25 PM Peak Hour, Inbound (vtph) 4 8 12 PM Peak Hour, Outbound (vtph) 4 8 12 Total PM Peak 8 16 24 vtpd - vehicle trips per day, vtph - vehicle trips per hour David Laws 13 July 2016 Page 6 Figure 3 — Existing Lane Configuration and Traffic Control i F:c.pmn. SPEED LIMIT XX TRAFFIC SIGNAL STOP SIGN aw"i ,444 Mel David Laws 13 July 2016 Page 7 Table 2 — Sunday Project Site Generated Trips Proposed Church. Total Trips with Time Period Existing Church Addition Project Average Sunday, Inbound (vtpd) 261 540 801 Average Sunday, Outbound (vtpd) 261 540 801 Total Daily 522 1,080 1,602 Peak Hour, Inbound (vtph) 84 174 258 Peak Hour, Outbound (vtph) 88 181 269 Total Peak 172 355 527 vtpd - vehicle trips per day, vtph - vehicle trips per hour Access The proposed site will continue to be served by three existing access points as described earlier. • Egleston Memorial Drive/Calle Concordia • East Access/Calle Concordia • North Access/Oracle Road To analyze the impact on the three access points the estimated trip generation for the existing and future conditions was distributed to the three project driveways and the intersection of Oracle Road/Calle Concordia. The trip distribution was based on the residential development density within a five (5) mile radius of the site. Figure 4 shows the trip distribution for the project as a percentage of net existing and new primary trips. Figure 5 shows the trip assignment the existing church while Figure 6 shows the trip assignment predicted with the church expansion project. The East Access is expected to experience minimal traffic during the peak hours due to the limited development to the east of the site and a lack of connectivity to the new parking lot. For the purpose of the analysis in this report no trips were assigned to the East Access. To analyze the overall impact of the exiting site with the proposed project the volumes from Figure 5 and Figure 6 were combined to yield the total traffic volumes associated with the future site. The total trip generation volumes can be seen in Figure 7. As shown in Figure 7, there are low traffic volumes associated with the site during the weekday AM and PM peak hours. It is expected that any significant traffic volumes associated with the site will generally be limited to the Sunday peak hour. David Laws 13 July 2016 Page 8 Figure 4 — Peak Hour Trip Distribution Figure 5 — Trip Assignment for Existing Site L N JAL ��. ./ 0 (a) [4] f 2 (2) (491 N J�� (631(3) 2—J �— David Laws 13 July 2016 Page 9 Figure 6 — Trip Assignment for Proposed Project Expansion LEGEND: XX = Weekday AM Peak Hour (XX) = Weekday PM Peak Hour (XX] = Sunday Peak Hour Vehicle Tips Per Hour EXISTING ROAD O h V V JAL [51 (0) 1 [31(0) 0 —► •-1(U [91 -i i- 2 (4) [1001 Cn -� t J- m O Cn J L JiL� [111] (5) 7-J +� f �tr David Laws 13 July 2016 Page 10 Figure 7 — Total Trip Assignment With the Proposed Project LEGEND: XX = Weekday AM Peak Hour (XX) = Weekday PM Peak Hour /XX] = Sunday Peak Hour Vehicle Trips Per Hour EXISTING ROAD a 0 r. i .J I L. [8] (1) 2 -J [4] (0) 0 —► —1 (1) (13] 4 (6) (149] b C� David Laws 13 July 2016 Page 11 J L .J 4 L [174] (8) 9 David Laws 13 July 2016 Page 12 Turn Lane Analysis A key element of this study is to determine the storage length requirements for the significant turning movements affected by the proposed project. Three major turning movements affected by the site were analyzed: • Northbound right turns at Oracle Road/Calle Concordia • Southbound left turns at Oracle Road/Calle Concordia • Northbound right turns at Oracle Road/North Access The queue storage requirements for the area roadways were calculated using the following methods as recommended in A Policy of Geometric Design of Highways and Streets (AASHTO, 2011). For the signalized intersection in the study area the turn lane storage was calculated as follows assuming random arrivals: Vehicles/cycle = 2 x (vehicles/hour)/cycles/hour Storage length = vehicles/cycle x 25 feet For un-signalized intersections, storage for vehicles likely to arrive in an average two - minute period within the peak hour should be provided. Vehicles per 2 min. period = (vehicles/hour)=(30 periods/hour) Storage length = vehicles per 2 min. period x 25 feet Table 3 shows the calculated queue lengths based on the total traffic volumes with the project. The computed values are typically rounded up to the nearest 25 feet. Table 3 — Sunday Calculated Queue Lengths Intersection Ixft Turn Storage Right Turn Storage NB SB FB WB NB SBEB WB Oracle Road/Calle Concordia Turning Volume (vph) 104 66 Scalculated = 130 83 Srounded = 150 100 Oracle Road/North Access Turning Volume (vph) 84 Scalculated = 70 Srounded = 75 J - storage in teet, vph - vehicles per how David Laws 13 July 2016 Page 13 With approximately 300 feet of storage space in the southbound left turn lane and 280 feet of storage space in the northbound right turn lane, the intersection of Oracle Road/Calle Concordia currently provides adequate capacity for the estimated traffic associated with the site expansion as detailed in Table 3. In addition, the existing storage capacity for the northbound right turn lane at the Oracle Road/North Access provides approximately 240 feet of storage. This will accommodate the calculated 75 feet of storage required with the proposed church expansion. Conclusion When fully built, the Canyon Del Oro Baptist Church site is predicted to generate twenty- five (25) weekday AM peak hour trips, twenty-four (24) weekday PM peak hour trips and 527 Sunday peak hour trips. There are low traffic volumes associated with the site during the weekday AM and PM peak hours. It is expected that any significant traffic volumes associated with the site will generally be limited to the Sunday peak hour when through traffic volumes are expected to be minimal on Oracle Road. The storage requirements for the southbound left turn lane and northbound right turn lane at the Oracle Road/Calle Concordia intersection are expected to provide adequate capacity for the estimated queues associated with traffic from the site. In addition, it is expected that the northbound right turn lane at the Oracle Road/North Access will provide sufficient storage with the proposed church expansion. Due to the limited traffic volumes associated with the site during the weekday peak periods and adequate storage provided for the major turning movements on Oracle Road it is expected that the Canyon Del Oro Baptist Church with the proposed expansion will not have a significant effect on the surrounding roadway system. Thank you again for your time and review of this TIS. If you have any questions regarding this TIS please feel free to contact me at 602.266.7983. Respectfully submitted, Oz_ 0"�� Christopher Williams, PE, PTOE Southwest Traffic Engineering, LLC Senior Traffic Engineer cc: Tim Smith, Swaim Associates Ltd. Architects AIA Ryan Stucki, Engineering and Environmental Consultants Attachments: Trip Generation Calculations Turn Lane Calculations 42636 CHRISTOPHER B. WILLIAMS ` A. k Expires 6-30-17 Church - Existing Weekday LAND USE: 14,266 1000 square feet Church - Existing TRIP GENERATION CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON THE INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS' TRIP GENERATION, 9TH EDITION. THE ITE LAND USE CODE IS Church - Existing (560) WEEKDAY Average Rate = 9.11 Trips per 1000 1000 square feet (SF) T = 9.11 Trips x 14266 SF / 1000 T = 130 VPD ENTER: (0.5)*(130) = 65 VPD EXIT: (0.5)*(130) = 65 VPD AM PEAK HOUR (ONE HOUR BETWEEN 7 AND 9 AM Average Rate = 0.56 Trips per 1000 1000 square feet (SF) T = 0.56 Trips x 14266 SF / 1000 T = 8 VPH ENTER: (0.62)*(8) = 5 VPH EXIT: (0.38)*(8) = 3 VPH PM PEAK HOUR (ONE HOUR BETWEEN 4 AND 6 PM Average Rate = 0.55 Trips per 1000 1000 square feet (SF) T = 0.55 Trips x 14266 SF / 1000 T = 8 VPH ENTER: (0.48)*(8) = 4 VPH EXIT: (0.52)*(8) = 4 VPH *where, T = trip ends TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY WEEKDAY 130 VTPD AM PEAK HOUR (ONE HOUR BETWEEN 7 AND 9 AM) 8 VTPH PM PEAK HOUR (ONE HOUR BETWEEN 4 AND 6 PM) 8 VPH Church - Existing Sunday LAND USE: 14,266 1000 square feet Church - Existing TRIP GENERATION CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON THE INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS' TRIP GENERATION, 9TH EDITION. THE ITE LAND USE CODE IS Church - Existing (560) SUNDAY Average Rate = 36.63 Trips per 1000 1000 square feet (SF) T = 36.63 Trips x 14266 SF / 1000 T = 522 VPD ENTER: (0.5)*(522) = 261 VPD EXIT: (0.5)*(522) = 261 VPD PEAK HOUR Average Rate = 12.04 Trips per 1000 1000 square feet (SF) T = 12.04 Trips x 14266 SF / 1000 T = 172 VPH ENTER: (0.49)*(172) = 84 VPH EXIT: (0.51)*(172) = 88 VPH *where, T = trip ends TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY SUNDAY 522 VTPD AM PEAK HOUR (ONE HOUR BETWEEN 7 AND 9 AM) 172 VTPH Church - Proposed Addition Weekday LAND USE: 29,486 1000 square feet Church - Proposed Addition TRIP GENERATION CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON THE INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS' TRIP GENERATION, 9TH EDITION. THE ITE LAND USE CODE IS Church - Proposed Addition (560) WEEKDAY Average Rate = 9.11 Trips per 1000 1000 square feet (SF) T = 9.11 Trips x 29486 SF / 1000 T = 268 VPD ENTER: (0.5)*(268) = 134 VPD EXIT: (0.5)*(268) = 134 VPD AM PEAK HOUR (ONE HOUR BETWEEN 7 AND 9 AM Average Rate = 0.56 Trips per 1000 1000 square feet (SF) T = 0.56 Trips x 29486 SF / 1000 T = 17 VPH ENTER: (0.62)*(17) = 11 VPH EXIT: (0.38)*(17) = 6 VPH PM PEAK HOUR (ONE HOUR BETWEEN 4 AND 6 PM Average Rate = 0.55 Trips per 1000 1000 square feet (SF) T = 0.55 Trips x 29486 SF / 1000 T = 16 VPH ENTER: (0.48)*(16) = 8 VPH EXIT: (0.52)*(16) = 8 VPH *where, T = trip ends TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY WEEKDAY 268 VTPD AM PEAK HOUR (ONE HOUR BETWEEN 7 AND 9 AM) 17 VTPH PM PEAK HOUR (ONE HOUR BETWEEN 4 AND 6 PM) 16 VPH Church - Proposed Addition Sunday LAND USE: 29,486 1000 square feet Church - Proposed Addition TRIP GENERATION CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON THE INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS' TRIP GENERATION, 9TH EDITION. THE ITE LAND USE CODE IS Church - Proposed Addition (560) SUNDAY Average Rate = 36.63 Trips per 1000 1000 square feet (SF) T = 36.63 Trips x 29486 SF / 1000 T = 1,080 VPD ENTER: (0.5)*(1080) = 540 VPD EXIT: (0.5)*(1080) = 540 VPD PEAK HOUR Average Rate = 12.04 Trips per 1000 1000 square feet (SF) T = 12.04 Trips x 29486 SF / 1000 T = 355 VPH ENTER: (0.49)*(355) = 174 VPH EXIT: (0.51)*(355) = 181 VPH *where, T = trip ends TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY SUNDAY 1,080 VTPD AM PEAK HOUR (ONE HOUR BETWEEN 7 AND 9 AM) 355 VTPH Signalized Intersection (Left Turn Storage) Peak Future with Project Traffic Volumes With Project Location: Oracle Road/Calle Concordia Approach/Leg: Southbound V = vehicles per hour Cycle Length = 90 sec PM Peak Hour V = 104 vph Vehicles/cycle = 2 x (vehicles/hour)/cycles/hour Storage length = vehicles/cycle x 25 feet S (ft) = 104 vph*(2)*(25 ft/veh)*(90sec/cycle) = 130 feet (3600sec/hr) Minimum Recommended Storage: 150 feet Signalized Intersection (Right Turn Storage) Peak Future with Project Traffic Volumes With Project Location: Oracle Road/Calle Concordia Approach/Leg: Northbound V = vehicles per hour Cycle Length = 90 sec PM Peak Hour V = 66 vph Vehicles/cycle = 2 x (vehicles/hour)/cycles/hour Storage length = vehicles/cycle x 25 feet S (ft) = 66 vph*(2)*(25 ft/veh)*(90sec/cycle) = 83 feet (3600sec/hr) Minimum Recommended Storage: 100 feet Un-Signalized Intersection (Right Turn Lane) Location: Oracle Road/North Access Approach/Leg: Northbound V = vehicles per hour PM Peak Hour V = 84 vph S = Storage = (V *2 min* 25 ft/veh)/60 min/hr S (ft) = 84 vph*(2 min)*(25 ft/veh) = 70 feet (60 min/hr) Minimum Recommended Storage: 75 feet With Project TOWN OF ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES DEPARTMENT 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE, ORO VALLEY, AZ. 85737 PHONE: (520) 229-4800 FAX: (520) 742-1022 www.orovalleyaz.gov/dis 1.2 GENERAL APPLICATION FORM OV Case #: Office Use Only Application Type: ❑ Major General Plan Amendment ❑ Final Plat „*r�„•►� ❑ Rezoning/PAD Amendment ❑ Pre -Application ❑ Planned Area Development ❑ Zoning Verification !� Il' ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Sign Criteria - ❑ Zoning Code Amendment ❑ Sign - PAD Exempti E811 ❑ Conceptual Site Plan ❑ Master Sign Program ❑ Conceptual Public Art ❑ Communication Facility — Tier 1 and 2 Minor ❑ Conceptual Architecture ❑ Communication Facility — Major Final Site Plan Revised Development Plan ❑ Conceptual Landscape Plan ❑ Other Subiect Property Information: Address: 9200 N. Oracle Rd. Tucson, AZ 85704 Parcel/Tax Code: 225-10-064C Subdivision / Commercial Center Name: Book / Page or Sequence Number: Lot Number(s) Legal Description: IRR PCL BEING PT OF S545' OF LOT 2 Section/Township/Range: 24-12-13 Area of Property: 15.84 acres Existing Land Use: Church Proposed Land Use: Church Applicant Information: Applicant *: * If more than one, attach list Name:Tim Smith Firm: Swaim Associates Architects, AIA Address: 7350 E. Speedway #210 City:Tucson State: AZ Zip Telephone: 520-326-3700 Fax: 520-326-1148 Email: tsmith@swaimaia.com Property Owner(s) if different from Applicant *: Name: Jerry Drobinski (Elder Board Chairman)Firm: Canyon Del Oro Baptist Church Address: 9200 N. Oracle Rd. Telephone: 520-297-3900 Consultant: Name: Address: Telephone: Fax: (Discipline) Fax: Qr�71 n City: Tucson State: AZ Zip: 85704 Email: jerry@globaldands.com Firm: City: _ Email: 4 State: Zip: r Project Description/Narrative: The current proeect is Phase 3 of the GDOBC campus expansion, documented in Master Development plan n number OV12-05-05. This project includes the Sanctuary building, Youth Building and the north portion of the parking lot. I hereby certify that I have read and examined this application and know the same to be true and correct. I am the owner of the property or the Owner's authorized representative, and if not the owner, I have obtained the owner's permission to perform stated work. All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this type of work will be complied with whether specified herein or not. The approval of this application does not presume to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of any other federal, state or local law for which this project may be subject to. Notice: It is the applicant/owner's responsibility to ensure all private rules and regulations (such as Covenants, Conditions & Restrictions (CC&R's)) of the subdivision and/or commercial center are adhered to. Contact your Home Owners Association or property management to determine applicable requirements. It is also the ap ca t' esponsibility to coordinate with all outside agencies to secure their acceptance or clearance. Failure to do s m2y e y issuance of permits. See attached list of agencies. Applicant's Sig ture Print Name Date Important Note: All submittals received after 4:00 p.m. will be processed the next day Submittals will be rejected if: • Not folded using Pima County fold & collated; • There are missing items on the checklist unless otherwise approved by Planning Division Manager or Town Engineer. • Re -submittals cannot be accepted without a transmittal and a written narrative summary describing the purpose of submittal. 5 r GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT CANYON DEL ORO BAPTIST CHURCH 9200 NORTH ORACLE ROAD ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT CANYON DEL ORO BAPTIST CHURCH MASTER PLAN 9200 NORTH ORACLE ROAD ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA Submitted To: CDO BAPTIST CHURCH 9200 NORTH ORACLE ROAD ORO VALLEY, AZ 85737 Submitted By: LMT Engineering, Inc. 180 S. Chelsea Park Place Tucson, Arizona 85748-1720 January 12, 2005 LMT Project 24588 ENG/NEER/NG Mc, LMT ENGMEERING, INC. Geotechnical & Materials Engineering 180 S. Chelsea Park Place Tucson, Arizona 85748 January 12, 2005 Tel: 520/885.3344 Fax: 520/885.8218 www.Imtengineering.com Pastor Steven Van Kley CDO Baptist Church 9200 N. Oracle Road Oro Valley, AZ 85737 Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Report New CDO Baptist Church Master Plan 9200 North Oracle Road, Oro Valley, Arizona LMT Engineering No. 24588 LMT Engineering, Inc. (LMT) has completed our geotechnical engineering exploration for the modifications and additions to the CDO Baptist Church as referenced above. This study was performed in general accordance with our proposal No. 24087, dated December 1, 2004. The results of our engineering study, including the test boring location diagram, laboratory test results, test boring records, and the geotechnical recommendations are attached. Based on the geotechnical engineering analyses, subsurface exploration and laboratory test results, the proposed structure could be supported on shallow spread footings. Footings at shallow depths should bear on engineered fills to reduce the settlement potentials. Slab -on -grade may be utilized for the interior floor systems. Other design and construction details, based upon geotechnical conditions, are presented in the report. We have appreciated being of service to you in the geotechnical engineering phase of this project. If you have any questions concerning this report, please contact us. Sincerely, LMT EN y 9674 ( , , ` LYLE M. t•,Vil'il Uvl TWEET Lyle M. Tweet, P.E. President qr� na U. S� Copies to: Addressee (3) Geotechnical Engineering Report CDO Baptist Church Modifications LMT Project 24588 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. INTRODUCTION..................................................... 1 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ......................................... 1 SITE EXPLORATION ................................................. 2 Field Exploration ................................................. 2 Laboratory Testing ................................................ 2 SITE CONDITIONS ................................................... 3 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS .......................................... 3 Soil Conditions .................................................. 3 Laboratory Test Results ............................................ 3 OPINIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............... 3 Geotechnical Considerations ........................................ 3 Foundations..................................................... 4 Seismic Classification ............................................. 5 Lateral Earth Pressures ............................................. 5 Floor Slab Design and Construction .................................. 6 Slopes.......................................................... 7 Erosion......................................................... 8 Percolation Tests ................................................. 8 Pavement Design and Construction ................................... 9 Earthwork...................................................... 10 General Considerations ..................................... 10 Site Clearing .............................................. 11 Excavation............................................... 12 Slab Subgrade Preparation .................................... 12 Foundation Preparation ..................................... 12 Fill Materials ............................................. 13 Placement and Compaction .................................. 13 Compliance .............................................. 14 Drainage....................................................... 14 SurfaceDrainage .......................................... 14 Subsurface Drainage ....................................... 15 GENERAL COMMENTS .............................................. 15 New Geotechnical Engineering Report CDO Baptist Church Modifications TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) APPENDIX A Site Plan Logs of Test borings Unified Soil Classification Drilling and Exploration Procedures APPENDIX B Laboratory Test Results Laboratory Test Procedures LMT Project No. 24588 4 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT CDO BAPTIST CHURCH MODIFICATIONS 9200 NORTH ORACLE ROAD ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA LMT PROJECT NO.24588 INTRODUCTION This report contains the results of our geotechnical engineering exploration for the proposed modifications to the CDO Baptist Church located at 9200 North Oracle Road in Oro Valley, Arizona, as shown on the site plan in Appendix A. The purpose of these services is to provide information and geotechnical engineering recommendations about: • subsurface soil conditions • groundwater conditions • floor slab design and construction • lateral soil pressures • earthwork • drainage • foundation design and construction • detention basin percolation test results The opinions and recommendations contained in this report are based upon the results of field and laboratory testing, engineering analyses, and experience with similar soil conditions, structures and our understanding of the proposed project as stated in our proposal and below. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION We understand the project includes some single story structures and some two story buildings (Adult Education Center) with approximate floor areas by the Master Plan Floor Plan Matrix as provided by Swaim Associates LTD. The buildings are expected to be constructed using wood frame and/or masonry exterior walls that will have maximum wall loads assumed to range up to 5 KLF and maximum column loads to range up to 75 kips. The buildings will be supported on shallow spread footings. The ground floor level for the buildings will range from about one to two feet above the existing grades to five to ten feet below existing grades (Sanctuary). The buildings will have conventional concrete slab on grade floors. The project also includes asphalt - paved parking and drive areas around the buildings. On -site retention/detention will also be required as part of the project. New Geotechnical Engineering Report CDO Baptist Church Modifications SITE EXPLORATION LMT Project No. 24588 2 Our scope of services performed for this project included a site reconnaissance by a geotechnical engineering representative, a subsurface exploration program, laboratory testing and engineering analyses. Field Exploration: Eight test borings were drilled at the site using a CME-75 drill rig. The test borings were drilled to depths of about 11 to 30 feet at the locations shown on the Site Plan in Appendix A. The test borings were located in the field by reference from property lines and/or existing site features.- The accuracy of the test boring locations should only be assumed to the level implied by the methods used to determine them. During the drilling operations, the geotechnical engineer recorded continuous lithologic logs of each test boring. Samples of subsurface materials were also obtained. Groundwater evaluations were made in each test boring at the time of site exploration. Soils were classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System described in Appendix A. Test boring logs were prepared and are presented in Appendix A. Laboratory Testing: Samples retrieved during the field exploration were transported to the laboratory for further evaluation. At that time, the field descriptions were confirmed or modified as necessary, and laboratory tests were performed to evaluate the engineering properties of the subsurface materials. Laboratory test results are presented in Appendix B. These test results were used for the geotechnical engineering analyses, and the development of foundation and earthwork recommendations. Geotechnical Engineering Report CDO Baptist Church Modifications SITE CONDITIONS At the time of our field work, the site was occupied by the existing church, as shown on the photo on the right. The ground surface ranged from relatively flat and level to hilly. The additions are to be constructed both in areas that are currently undeveloped, native, hilly desert and existing, developed areas. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS LMT Project 24588 3 Soil Conditions: As presented on Logs of Test Borings, the soils at the site to the full depths of the test borings were silty sands and gravels. The densities of the soils were variable and ranged from moderately dense to very dense. The shallow soils below about 10 feet generally had lower densities that the deeper soils. The soils had non -plastic fines. Carbonate cementation of the soils was classified as ranging from nil to moderate. The soils were dry to slightly damp throughout the test borings. Groundwater was not encountered in any of the test borings. Laboratory Test Results: Consolidation tests performed on the native soils indicate the shallow site soils have low compression potentials at the existing moisture contents, but undergo slight to moderate additional compression when the soils become inundated. The native soils are sands and gravels with low plasticity fines which should have low expansive potentials when compacted. OPINIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Geotechnical Considerations: The site is considered suitable for the proposed development based on the geotechnical conditions encountered and tested for this report. If there are any significant deviations from the assumed floor elevations, building locations and/or loads noted at the start of this report, the opinions and recommendations of this report should be reviewed and confirmed/modified as necessary to reflect the final planned design conditions. New Geotechnical Engineering Report CDO Baptist Church Modifications LMT Project No. 24588 4 Foundations: Shallow spread footings are considered suitable to support the proposed buildings. Due to the variability and moisture sensitivity of the site soils, the footings should bear on engineered fill to provide more uniform bearing conditions and to reduce the settlement potentials. If there are buildings that will require cuts of more than 8 feet to achieve finished grade, we should be contacted for further recommendations, since these footings could likely bear on the undisturbed native soils. The engineered fill should extend below the footings to a depth equal to the width of wall footings and equal to one-half the width of column footings, but not less than 2.0 feet for either case. The engineered fill should extend beyond the edges of the footings for a distance of one-half the depth of compaction, but not less than 1.0 feet. Materials and compaction criteria for the engineered fill should be as recommended in the Earthwork section of this report. Adequate drainage should be provided to prevent the supporting soils from undergoing significant moisture changes. The recommended design bearing capacities and footing depths are as shown below. These recommendations are based on the footings bearing at shallow depths below existing grade. �botiiigDeptllloyv'ab�eeariz�g>r $3C>: �, 2,000 1.5 2.0 2,500 Footing depth referenced below lowest adjacent finished grade. Finished grade is the lowest adjacent grade for perimeter footings and floor level for interior footings. Contact stress at the base of footings may be increased by one-third when considering total loads that include wind or seismic conditions. Thickened slab sections can be used to support interior partitions, provided that: loads do not exceed 900 plf, thickened sections have a minimum width of 12 inches, and thickness and reinforcement are consistent with structural requirements. Geotechnical Engineering Report LMT Project 24588 CDO Baptist Church Modifications 5 For shallow spread footings total and differential settlements resulting from the assumed structural loads -are estimated to be on the order of 1 inch and inch respectively, or less. Additional foundation movements could occur if water from any source infiltrates the foundation soils. Therefore, proper drainage should be provided in the final design and during construction and areas adjacent to the building should be designed to prevent water from ponding or accumulating next to the structure(s). Total and differential settlements should not exceed predicted values, provided that: foundations are constructed as recommended, and essentially no changes occur in water contents of foundation soils. For foundations adjacent to slopes, a minimum horizontal setback of five (5) feet should be maintained between the foundation base and slope face. In addition, the setback should be such that an imaginary line extending downward at 45 degrees from the nearest foundation edge does not intersect the slope. Footings, foundations, and masonry walls should be reinforced as necessary to reduce the potential for distress caused by differential foundation movement. The use of joints at openings or other discontinuities in masonry walls is recommended. Foundation excavations should be observed by LMT. If the soil conditions encountered differ significantly from those presented in this report, supplemental recommendations will be required. Seismic Classification: This site is considered to be Site Class D, based on the information in Table 1615.1.1 of the International Building Code. Lateral Earth Pressures: For soils above any free water surface, recommended equivalent fluid pressures for unrestrained foundation elements are presented in the following table: Active: Granular soil backfill (on -site sand) ............... 30 psf/ft Undisturbed subsoil ........................... 35 psf/ft New Geotechnical Engineering Report LMT Project No. 24588 CDO Baptist Church Modifications 6 • Passive: Shallow foundation walls ...................... 250 psf/ft Shallow column footings ...................... 350 psf/ft • Coefficient of base friction ...................... 0.40* * The coefficient of base friction should be reduced to 0.30 when used in conjunction with passive pressure. Where the design includes restrained elements, the following equivalent fluid pressures are recommended: • At rest: Granular soil backfill (on -site sand) ............... 50 psf/ft Undisturbed subsoil ........................... 60 psf/ft The lateral earth pressures herein are not applicable for submerged soils. Additional recommendations may be necessary if such conditions are to be included in the design. Fill against grade beams and retaining walls should be compacted to densities specified in Earthwork. Medium to high plasticity clay soils should not be used as backfill against retaining walls. Compaction of each lift adjacent to walls should be accomplished with hand -operated tampers or other lightweight compactors. Overcompaction may cause excessive lateral earth pressures which could result in wall movement. Floor Slab Design and Construction: On -site soils or imported soils with low expansive potentials should be used in fills which will support the floor slabs. Some differential movement of a slab -on -grade floor system is possible if the subgrade soils become elevated in moisture content. Such movements are considered within general tolerance for normal slab -on -grade construction. To reduce potential slab movements, the subgrade soils should be prepared as outlined in the Earthwork section of this report. Geotechnical Engineering Report CDO Baptist Church Modifications LMT Project 24588 7 For structural design of concrete slabs -on -grade, a modulus of subgrade reaction of 250 pounds per cubic inch (pci) may be used for floors supported on compacted native soils or engineered fill. Additional floor slab design and construction recommendations are as follows: • Control joints should be provided in slabs to control the location and extent of cracking. Maximum joint spacing of 10 feet in each direction is recommended. • Interior trench backfill placed beneath slabs should be compacted in accordance with recommended specifications outlined below. • In areas subjected to normal loading, a minimum 4-inch layer of clean -graded gravel, aggregate base course should be placed beneath interior slabs. For heavy loading, reevaluation of slab and/or base course thickness may be required. • If moisture sensitive floor coverings are used on interior slabs, consideration should be given to the use of barriers to reduce the potential for vapor to rise through the slab. • Other design and construction considerations, as outlined in the ACI Design Manual, Section 302.1R are recommended. • Subgrade preparation and moisture control recommendations provided in this report will mitigate soil related problems which may result in distress of concrete floor slabs on grade. However, concrete drying shrinkage, temperature induced volume change and curling can create cracking and distress in the concrete slab on grade. To reduce distress from these causes, properly proportioned concrete mixes with adequate curing and proper joint spacing must be provided. Slopes: Assuming fill specifications, compaction requirements, and recommended setbacks provided in this report are followed, cut and fill slopes as steep as to 2.5:1 (horizontal:vertical) should be stable. Depending upon specific project conditions, adequate factors of safety against slope New Geotechnical Engineering Report CDO Baptist Church Modifications LMT Project No. 24588 8 failure may be available for steeper configurations. However, such a determination would require additional analysis. All structures should be set back from the edges of slopes (including any detention/retention basins) a distance equal to the slope height, with a minimum setback distance of five feet for any slope. The minimum setback can be waived if the footing embedments are deepened. Any reduction in the minimum setback distances noted above should be reviewed and approved by LMT Engineering prior to construction. Native slopes steeper than 3:1 (horizontal:vertical), should be benched prior to the placement of fill. These benches shall extend a minimum of five feet horizontally into the native slope. All fills along these slopes shall be placed horizontally. Erosion Fill slopes steeper than 5:1(horizontal:vertical) will require erosion protection. The extent of such protection depends on the angle of inclination of the slope. Minimum recommended erosion protection is: Slope Inclination Minimum Recommended Protection (horizontal:vertical) (applied to slope face) 5:1 to 3:1 Hydro seeding/Vegetation 3:1 to 2.5:1 Rip -Rap D50 z4 inches 2.5:1 to 1.5:1* Rip -Rap D50 �: 12 inches** * stability analysis required ** placed over filter fabric/grouted rip -rap Percolation Tests: Percolation testing services were performed to evaluate the soil absorption rates in the area of the proposed detention basins. The tests were performed using the cased boring method in test holes drilled using the CME-75 drill rig at the locations shown on the site plan in Appendix A. The Geotechnical Engineering Report CDO Baptist Church Modifications LMT Project 24588 9 tests were performed in borings that were drilled to depths of approximately 2 feet, the approximate depths of the detention basins. In addition to these borings, thirty -foot -deep borings were drilled to determine the soil profile at the site. Results of the tests are shown in the following table. E• � zif � � �fi Q �&""�(�i�' 3 y�C�S�Ff� ���t�YtYp'.� �P�p aAfy f{�*�■`■S,/� 1�u ier eaas:� `KIft �3�Sic+'P'3f1, r.` '�, r?1..Ch zli�'4"'_PT � T v1 s -.�` r _Y..;•t. .. .... .., P - 1 2 5 P-2 4 4 P-3 2 10 P-4 2 9 * Depths of the tests are referenced to adjacent grade The stabilized percolation rates should be expected to become slower with time as the detention basins "silt in." Therefore, a factor of safety should be used in designing the sizes of the basins to account for this slowing of the percolation rate. Pavement Design and Construction: Design of pavements for the project has been based on the procedures outlined in the Guideline for Design of Pavement Structures by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). Complete pavement design calculations can be provided on request. The recommended flexible pavement section for the parking areas on the site is 2.0 inches of asphalt concrete on 4 inches of aggregate base course. For the access and drive areas on the site, a pavement section of 2.5 inches of asphalt concrete on 4 inches of aggregate base course is recommended. These pavement sections are based on site traffic being a low volume of vehicles consisting mainly of automobiles and light trucks. A pavement section of 6.0 inches of portland cement concrete on 4 inches of base course is recommended for areas that will be subjected to heavy, sustained, concentrated loads, such as dumpster and truck loading areas. New Geotechnical Engineering Report LMT Project No. 24588 CDO Baptist Church Modifications 10 Aggregate base course should consist of a blend of sand and gravel which meets specifications for quality and gradation. Use of materials meeting Town of Oro Valley or PAG specifications is recommended. In addition, the base course material should be moisture stable. Aggregate base course should be placed in lifts not exceeding six inches and should be compacted to a minimum of 100% Standard Proctor density (ASTM D-698), within a moisture content range of 4 percent below, to 2 percent above optimum. If there are any areas where base course thickness exceeds 6 inches, the material should be placed and compacted in two or more lifts of equal thickness. Asphalt concrete should be obtained from an approved mix design stating the Marshall or Hveem properties, optimum asphalt content, job mix formula, and recommended mixing and placing temperatures. Aggregate used in asphalt concrete should meet a particular gradation. Use of materials meeting Town of Oro Valley or PAG specifications is recommended. The asphalt material should be placed in maximum 3-inch lifts, and should be compacted to a minimum of 95% Marshall or Hveem density (ASTM D-1559). The performance of the recommended asphalt sections can be enhanced by minimizing excess moisture which can reach the subgrade soils. The following recommendations should be considered at minimum: Site grading at a minimum 2% grade away from the pavements; Compaction of any utility trenches to the same criteria as the pavement subgrade. Preventative maintenance should be planned and provided for through an on -going pavement management program to enhance future pavement performance. Preventive maintenance activities are intended to slow the rate of pavement deterioration and to preserve the pavement investment. EARTHWORK: General Considerations: The opinions contained in this report for the proposed construction are contingent upon compliance with recommendations presented in this section. Geotechnical Engineering Report LMT Project 24588 CDO Baptist Church Modifications 11 Although underground facilities such as foundations, septic tanks, cesspools and basements were not observed during site reconnaissance, such features might be encountered during construction. Site Clearing: 1. Strip and remove all existing fill, vegetation, debris and other deleterious materials from the proposed building areas. Any existing structures should be completely removed from below any building, including foundation elements and any associated development such as underground utilities, septic tanks, etc. All exposed surfaces should be free of mounds and depressions which could prevent uniform compaction. 2. If unexpected fills or underground facilities are encountered during site clearing, such features should be removed and the.excavation thoroughly cleaned prior to backfill placement and/or construction. All excavations should be observed by LMT Engineering prior to backfill placement. 3. Stripped materials consisting of vegetation and organic materials should be wasted from the site, or used to revegetate exposed slopes after completion of grading operations. If it is necessary to dispose of organic materials on -site, they should be placed in non-structural areas, and in fill sections not exceeding 5 feet in height. 4. Sloping areas steeper than 5:1 (horizontal:vertical) should be benched to reduce the potential for slippage between existing slopes and fills. Benches should be level and wide enough to accommodate compaction and earth moving equipment. 5. The site should be initially graded to create a relatively level surface to receive fill, and to provide for a relatively uniform thickness of fill beneath proposed building structures. 6. All exposed areas which will receive fill, once properly cleared and benched where necessary, should be scarified to a minimum depth of eight inches, conditioned to near optimum moisture content, and compacted. New Geotechnical Engineering Report CDO Baptist Church Modifications 1. 2. 2. Excavation: LMT Project No. 24588 12 It is anticipated that shallow excavations for the proposed construction can generally be accomplished with conventional earthmoving equipment. Deeper excavations may be difficult due to the density and granular nature of the site soils. Evaluation of the site excavation conditions would best be done using the same type of equipment as will be used during construction. On -site soils may pump or become unstable or unworkable at high water contents. Workability may be improved by scarifying and drying. Overexcavation of wet zones and replacement with granular materials may be necessary. Lightweight excavation equipment may be required to reduce subgrade pumping. Slab and Pavement Subgrade Preparation: After site clearing is complete, soils below floor slab areas should be scarified, moisture conditioned and compacted to a minimum depth of 8 inches. A minimum 4-inch layer of clean -graded gravel or sand base course should be placed beneath floor slabs. Foundation Preparation: The existing soils should be removed as necessary to provide at least the minimum recommended depth of engineered fill below the bottoms of the footings and beyond the footing edges. (See the Foundations section of this report for the recommended depth and lateral extent of the engineered fill.) Any loose or disturbed soils below this depth below the footing areas should be overexcavated until dense, undisturbed native soils are encountered. Soils that will support footings should be replaced and compacted as engineered fills. The depth of removal can be reduced, as approved by the Geotechnical Engineer, in areas where the dense, strongly cemented soils are encountered. Geotechnical Engineering Report CDO Baptist Church Modifications 1. 01 Fill Materials: LMT Project 24588 13 On -site sandy soils or imported soils with low expansive potentials could be used as fill material for the following: • general site grading • foundation areas • interior floor slab areas • exterior slab areas • foundation backfill Select granular materials should be used as backfill behind walls which retain earth. 3. Imported soils (if required) should conform to the following: Percent finer by weight Gradation (ASTM C136) 611 ................................................... 100 No. 200 Sieve ..................................... 60 (max) Maximum expansive potential (%)* ........................ 1.5 * Measured on a sample compacted to approximately 95 percent of the ASTM D698 maximum dry density at about 3 percent below optimum water content. The sample is confined under a 144 psf surcharge and submerged. 4. Aggregate base should conform to Town of Oro Valley specifications. • Placement and Compaction: 1. Place and compact fill in horizontal lifts, using equipment and procedures that will produce recommended moisture contents and densities throughout the lift. 2. Uncompacted fill lifts should not exceed 10 inches loose thickness. New Geotechnical Engineering Report CDO Baptist Church Modifications 93 Q Materials should be compacted to the following: Material Subgrade soils beneath fill areas ............ LMT Project No. 24588 14 Minimum Percent (ASTM D698) ............... 95 On -site soils and Imported fills: Beneath foundations ..........................:...... 95 Beneath slabs and pavements .......................... 95 Aggregate base (beneath slabs and pavements) ................. 95 Miscellaneous backfill.................................... 90 On -site and imported soils should be compacted at moisture contents near optimum. Compliance: Recommendations for slabs -on -grade and foundation elements supported on compacted fills or prepared subgrade depend upon compliance with Earthwork recommendations. To assess compliance, observation and testing should be performed under the direction of LMT Engineering. Drainage: • Surface Drainage: 1. Positive drainage should be provided during construction and maintained throughout the life of the proposed project. Infiltration of water into utility or foundation excavations must be prevented during construction. Planters and other surface features which could retain water in areas adjacent to the building or pavements should be sealed or eliminated. 2. In areas where sidewalks or paving do not immediately adjoin the structure, we recommend that protective slopes be provided with a minimum grade of approximately 5 percent for at least 10 feet from perimeter walls. Backfill against footings, exterior walls, and in utility and sprinkler line trenches should be well compacted and free of all construction debris to reduce the possibility of moisture infiltration. Geotechnical Engineering Report CDO Baptist Church Modifications LMT Project 24588 15 3. Downspouts, roof drains or scuppers should discharge into splash blocks or extensions when the ground surface beneath such features is not protected by exterior slabs or paving. 4. Sprinkler systems should not be installed within 5 feet of foundation walls. Landscaped irrigation adjacent to the foundation system should be minimized or eliminated. Subsurface Drainage: Free -draining, granular soils containing less than five percent fines (by weight) passing a No. 200 sieve should be placed adjacent to walls which retain earth. A drainage system consisting of either weep holes or perforated drain lines (placed near the base of the wall) should be used to intercept and discharge water which would tend to saturate the backfill. Where used, drain lines should be embedded in a uniformly graded filter material and provided with adequate clean -outs for periodic maintenance. An impervious soil should be used in the upper layer of backfill to reduce the potential for water infiltration. GENERAL COMMENTS It is recommended that LMT Engineering be retained to provide a general review of final design plans and specifications in order to confirm that grading and foundation recommendations in this report have been interpreted and implemented. In the event that any changes of the proposed project are planned, the opinions and recommendations contained in this report should be reviewed and the report modified or supplemented as necessary. LMT Engineering should also be retained to provide services during excavation, grading, foundation, and construction phases of the work. Observation of footing excavations should be performed prior to placement of reinforcing and concrete to confirm that satisfactory bearing materials are present and is considered a necessary part of continuing geotechnical engineering services for the project. Construction testing, including field and laboratory evaluation of fill, backfill, pavement materials, concrete and steel should be performed to determine whether applicable project requirements have been met. The analyses and recommendations in this report are based in part upon data obtained from the field exploration. The natuia and extent of variations beyond the location of Test Borings may New Geotechnical Engineering Report CDO Baptist Church Modifications LMT Project No. 24588 16 not become evident until construction. If variations then appear evident, it may be necessary to re-evaluate the recommendations of this report. Our professional services were performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable geotechncal engineers practicing in this or similar localities at the same time. No warranty, express or implied, is intended or made. We prepared the report as an aid in design of the proposed project. This report is not a bidding document. Any contractor reviewing this report must draw his own conclusions regarding site conditions and specific construction equipment and techniques to be used on this project. This report is for the exclusive purpose of providing geotechnical engineering and/or testing information and recommendations. The scope of services for this project does not include, either specifically or by implication, any environmental assessment of the site or identification of contaminated or hazardous materials or conditions. If the owner is concerned about the potential for such contamination, other studies should be undertaken. This report may be used only by the Client and only for the purposes stated, within a reasonable time from its issuance. Land use, site conditions (both on and off site), or other factors may change over time and additional work may be required with the passage of time. Any party, other than the Client, who wishes to use this report shall notify LMT Engineering in writing of such intended use. Based on the intended use of the report, LMT Engineering may require that additional work be performed and that an updated report be issued. Non-compliance with any of these requirements, by the Client or anyone else, will release LMT Engineering from any liability resulting from the use of this report by an unauthorized parry. APPENDIX A Site Plan Logs of Borings Unified Soil Classification System Test Drilling Equipment & Procedures LMT PROJECT NO. 24588 LOG OF TEST BORING NO. 1 Project: CDO Baptist Church Project Location: 9200 N. Oracle Road Boring Location: Shown on site plan. Elevation: Datum: Remarks: a a zo � a U1 u! W w = 0 U a 3 m 0 o o co = DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SM/GM SILTY SAND/GRAVEL brown, moderately dense to 1 • .Dense, low plasticity, slightly damp to damp weak cementation R 7 - 12 106 1.5 2 y Becomes light tan below about 2' 3 4 R 9 - 13 110 1.3 5 6 7 8 9 R 25 - 40 10 11 12 13 14 R 31 - 44 15 GM SILTY SANDY GRAVEL It. brown, dense to very dense low plasticity, slightly damp to damp 16 weak cementation The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary lines Sample Type Key: S = Split Spoon H = Hand Sample between soil and rock types: In -situ, the transition may be gradual. NR = No Recovery R = Ring Sampler RF = Refusal Boring Date: 12/20/2004 LMT ENGINEERING, INC. Drill Rig:CME-75 Page: 1 of 2 LMT PROJECT NO. 24588 LOG OF TEST BORING NO. 1 Project: CDO Baptist Church Project Location: 2411 East Fort Lowell Road Boring Location: Shown on site plan. Elevation: Datum: Remarks: U a a cc ° w a. W j O m o 0 o j DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SM SILTY SANDY GRAVEL light brown, dense to very dense, 16 non -plastic to low plasticity, slightly damp, moderate Cementation 17 18 19 S 20-50/5" 20 21 22 23 24. S 11-16-22 25 26 27 28 29 Auger refusal @ 29-0" 30 No Ground Water encountered 31 The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary lines Sample Type Key: S = Split Spoon H = Hand Sample between soil and rock types: In -situ, the transition may be gradual. NR = No Recovery R = Ring Sampler RF = Refusal Boring Date:12/20/2004 LMT ENGINEERING, INC. Drill Rig Type:CME-75 NTr [Page: 2 of 2 LMT PROJECT NO. 24588 LOG OF TEST BORING NO. 2 Project: CDO Baptist Church Project Location: 9200 N. Oracle Road Boring Location: Shown on site plan. Elevation: Datum: Remarks: Chip seal parking surface U a a. X ° �1 W LU LU a. z W a � = O U � a o 0 o w U cUn DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS cn m o o D SM SILTY SAND brown, moderately dense to dense 1 Non -plastic, slightly damp to damp., weak cementation R 8 - 12 115 4.1 2 3 4 R 21 - 24 121 4.7 5 6 7 8 9 S 14-16-13 10 11 12 13 14 S 9-33-14 15 _ 16 The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary lines Sample Type Key: S = Split Spoon H = Hand Sample between soil and rock types: In -situ, the transition may be gradual. NR = No Recovery R = Ring Sampler RF = Refusal Boring Date: 12/20/2004 LMT ENGINEERING5 INC. 4 Drill Rig:CME-75 1 Page: 1 of 2 LMT PROJECT NO. 24588 LOG OF TEST BORING NO. 2 Project: CDO Baptist Church Project Location: 9200 N. Oracle Road Boring Location: Shown on site plan. Elevation: Datum: Remarks: U o: a. X o ff w ui a. a. z W ¢ O U a. o U g = U DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS c¢n m o o SM SILTY SANDY GRAVEL light brown, dense to very dense, 16 non -plastic to low plasticity, slightly damp, moderate Cementation 17 18 19 S 11-14-18 20 21 22 23 ' 24 S 24-20-24 25 26 27 28 1. 29 S 30-36-33 30 31 Bottom of boring - o groundwater encountered The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary lines e Key: S = Split Spoon H = Hand Sample Sa�NR between soil and rock types: In -situ, the transition may be gradual. o Recovery R = Ring Sampler RF = Refusal Boring Date:12/20/2004 i6LMT ENGINEERING, INC. Drill Rig Type:CME-75 IV Page: 2 of 2 LMT PROJECT NO. 24588 LOG OF TEST BORING NO. 3 Project: CDO Baptist Church Project Location: 9200 N. Oracle Road Boring Location: Shown on site plan. Elevation: I Datum: Remarks: Chip seal parking surface a w n is cc c w w w a w = o m o o = DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS co SM/GM SILTY SAND/GRAVEL brown, moderately dense to dense 1 Non -plastic, slightly damp to damp, weak cementation R 16-28 2 3 4 R 6 - 12 NR 5 6 7 8 9 R 12 - 20 105 1.8 10 11 12 13 14 S 23 - 41 -42 15 16 The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary lines Sample Type Key: S = Split Spoon H = Hand Sample between soil and rock types: In -situ, the transition may be gradual. NR = No Recovery R = Ring Sampler RF = Refusal Boring Date: 12/20/2004 LMT ENGINEERING, INC. DrillRig:CME-75 Page: 1 of 2 LMT PROJECT NO. 24588 LOG OF TEST BORING NO. 3 Project: CDO Baptist Church Project Location: 2411 East Fort Lowell Road Boring Location: Shown on site plan. Elevation: Datum: Remarks: U a a a Z w IrLu = 0 O U oJ. m o o (0 0 F o ? DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SM SILTY SANDY GRAVEL light brown, dense to very dense, 16 non -plastic to low plasticity, slightly damp, moderate Cementation) 17 18 19 S 12-16-49 20 21 22 . 23 24 S 50/6" 25 26 27 28 29 S 25-50/5" 30 31 Bottom of boring Q 31-0 o groundwater encou- ere The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary lines Sample Type Key: S = Split Spoon H = Hand Sample between soil and rock types: In -situ, the transition may be gradual. NR = No Recovery R = Ring Sampler RF = Refusal Boring Date:12/20/2004 4t'�' LMT ENGINEERING, INC. Drill Rig Type:CME-75 Page: 2 of 2 LMT PROJECT NO. 24588 LOG OF TEST BORING NO. 4 Project: CDO Baptist Church Project Location: 9200 N. Oracle Road Boring Location: Shown on site plan. Elevation: Datum: Remarks: Chip seal parking surface LL U a a M r W cn Z W .LLW. = S U a cc c 0 ►— W co co DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ino SM/GM SILTY SAND/GRAVEL brown, moderately dense to dense 1 Non -plastic, slightly damp to damp, weak cementation R 18-20 2 3 4 S 6 - 6- 25 5 6 7 8 9 S 15 - 50/5.5" 10 11 12 13 14 S 50/5" 15 Bottom of boring @ 15'-5" 16 No groundwater encountered The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary lines Sample Type Key: S = Split Spoon H = Hand Sample between soil and rock types: In -situ, the transition may be gradual. NR = No Recovery R = Ring Sampler RF = Refusal Boring Date: 12/20/2004 LMT ENGINEERING, INC. Drill Rig:CME-75 Page: 1 of 1 LMT PROJECT NO. 24588 LOG OF TEST BORING NO. 5 Project: CDO Baptist Church Project Location: 9200 N. Oracle Road Boring Location: Shown on site plan. Elevation: I Datum: Remarks: Chip seal parking surface zo a.a. Lu a. W .WW. 00 > 0 o ? DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS coo SM SILTY SAND w/ GRAVEL It. brown, moderately dense to 1 very dense, Non -plastic, slightly damp to damp, weak cementation R 8-8 112 1.6 2 3 4 S 28 - 50/4" 5 6 7 8 9 S 31-20-21 10 11 12 13 14 S 13-20-22 15 16 Bottom of boring 16'-6" No groundwater encountered The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary lines Sample Type Key: S = Split Spoon H = Hand Sample between soil and rock types: In -situ, the transition may be gradual. NR = No Recovery R = Ring Sampler RF = Refusal Boring Date: 12/20/2004 LMT ENGINEERING, INC. Drill Rig:CME-75 �G Page: 1 of 1 LMT PROJECT NO. 24588 LOG OF TEST BORING NO. 6 Project: CDO Baptist Church Project Location: 9200 N. Oracle Road Boring Location: Shown on site plan. Elevation: I Datum: Remarks: Chip seal parking surface LL U n. a. ZD X w W a- w cc !E.0 0- m 0!_- o 0 CL o to W DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SM SILTY SAND w/ GRAVEL It. brown, moderately dense to 1 very dense, Non -plastic, slightly damp to damp, weak cementation R 9 - 11 110 2.1 2 3 4 S 10-13-25 5 6 7 8 9 S 12 -20-32 10 11 12 Bottom of boring 9 1 V-6" No groundwater encountered 13 14 15, 16 The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary lines Sample Type Key: S = Split Spoon H = Hand Sample between soil and rock types: In -situ, the transition may be gradual. NR = No Recovery R = Ring Sampler RF = Refusal Boring Date: 12/20/2004 LMT ENGINEERING, INC, Drill Rig:CME-75 �G Page: 1 of 1 LIVIT PROJECT NO. 24588 LOG OF TEST BORING NO. 8 Project: CDO Baptist Church Project Location: 9200 N. Oracle Road Boring Location: Shown on site plan. Elevation: Datum: Remarks: Chip seal parking surface U a a cc o t= a. W X !L- o U aa.. 0 = o DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS can m o GM SILTY SANDY GRAVEL It. tan, moderately dense to 1 very dense, Non -plastic, slightly damp, weak to moderate cementation 2 R 25 - 50/5" 113 2.6 3 4 S 20-17-10 5 6 7 8 9 S 28-50/5.5" 101 11 , 12 Bottom of boring @ 11 No groundwater encountered 13- 14 15 16 The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary lines Sample Type Key: S = Split Spoon H = Hand Sample between soil and rock types: In -situ, the transition may be gradual. NR = No Recovery R = Ring Sampler RF = Refusal Boring Date: 12/20/2004 L,MT ENGINEERING5 INC■ Drill Rig:CME-75 EAK,dV�1NG /na low Page: 1 of 1 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM CONSISTENCY OR RELATIVE Group DENSITY CRITERIA Major Divisions Symbols Typical Names Gravels 50% or more of Clean GW Well -graded gravels and gravel -sand mixtures, little or no fines Standard Penetration Test Coarse- Grained coarse fraction retained on No. 4 sieve Gravels GP Poorly graded gravels and gravel -sand mixtures, little or no fines Density of Granular Soils Penetration Gravels with GM Silty gravels, gravel -sand -silt mixtures SOUS Resistance N (blows/ft) Relative Density More than Fines GC Clayey gravels, gravel -sand -day mixtures 0-4 Very Loose 50% retained on No. 200 sieve 5-10 Loose 11-30 Medium Dense 31-50 Dense Sands More than 50% of coarse fraction passes No. 4 sieve Clean Sands SW Well -graded sands and gravelly sands, little or no fines SP Poorly graded sands and gravelly sands, • little or no fines Sands with SM silty sands, sand -silt mixtures Fines >50 Very Dense Sc Clayey sands, sand -day mixtures Fine- Grained Soils Silts and Clays Liquid Limit 50 or less ML Inorganic slltts, very fine sands, rock flour, silty or clayey fine sands I Standard Penetration Test Consistency of Cohesive Soils Unconfined Penetration Compressive Resistance N Strength (blows/ft) Consistency (Tons/ft2) CL Inorganic days of low to medium plasticity, gravelly days, sandy days, silty clays. lean days 50% or OL Organic silts and organic silty days of low plasticity <2 Very Soft <0.25 more passes No. 200 sieve 2-4 Soft 0.25-0.50 4.8 Firm 0.50-1.00 Silts and Clays MH Inorganic silts, micaceous or diatomaceous fine sands or silts, elastic silts Liquid Limit greater than 50 8 -15 Stiff 1.00-2.00 CH Inorganic days of high plasticity• fat days 15-30 Very Stiff 2.00-4.00 OH Organic days of medium to high plasticity >30 Hard >4.0 Highly Organic Soils PT Peat, mude, & other highly organic soils U.S. Standard Sieve Sizes 3' T4' #4 #10 #40 #200 Unified Soil Cobbles Gravel Sand Slit or Clay Classification coarse fine coarse medium fine MOISTURE CONDITIONS MATERIAL QUANTITY OTHER SYMBOLS Dry Absence of moist, dusty, dry to the touch trace 0 - 5% R Ring Sample Slightly Damp Below optimum moisture content for compaction few 5 -10% S SPT Sample Moist Near optimum moisture content, will moisten the hand little 10 - 25% B Bulk Sample Very Moist Above optimum moisture content some 25 - 45% • Groundwater Wet Visible free water; below water table mostly 50 -100% BASIC LOG FORMAT: Group name, Group symbol, (grain size), color, moisture, consistency or relative density. Additional comments: odor, presence of roots, mica, gypsum, coarse grained particles, etc. EXAMPLE: SILTY SAND w/ trace silt (SM-SP), Brown, loose to med. dense, fine to medium grained, damp UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM TEST DRILLING EQUIPMENT & PROCEDURES Description of Subsurface Exploration Methods Auger Boring Drilling is normally performed using 6 5/8 O.D., 3-1/a inch I.D. hollow stem auger. Carbide insert teeth are normally used on bits so they can penetrate soft rock and hard soils. A CME-55 or -75, truck -mounted drill rig is used typically used to advance the auger. Generally, refusal to penetration of the auger is adopted when the downward progress of the auger is halted or would require undue effort and/or wear and tear on the rig to continue. Grab samples or auger cuttings may be taken as necessary. Standard penetration tests or 2.42-inch diameter ring samples are taken in conjunction with the auger borings as needed, with the sampling interval and type being indicated on the boring logs. Sampling Procedures Dynamically driven tube samples are usually obtained at selected intervals in the borings by the ASTM D1586 procedure. In many cases, 2" O.D., 1 3/8" I.D. samplers are used to obtain the standard penetration resistance. "Undisturbed" samples of the firmer soils are often obtained by 3" O.D. samplers; lined with 2.42" I.D. brass rings. The driving energy is generally recorded as the number of blows of a 140-pound free fall drop hammer required to advance the samplers in 6-inch increments. However, in stratified soils, driving resistance is sometimes recorded in 2- or 3- inch increments so that soil changes and the presence of scattered gravel or cemented layers can be readily detected and the realistic penetration values obtained for consideration in design. These values are expressed in blows per 6 inches on the boring logs. When necessary for testing, larger bulk samples are taken from auger cuttings. Boring Records Drilling operations are directed by our field engineer or geologist who examines soils recovery and prepares the boring logs. Soils are visually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (ASTM D2487), with appropriate group symbols being shown on the boring logs. APPENDIX B Laboratory Test Results Laboratory Testing Procedures oil PROJECT: CDO BAPTIST CHURCH LOCATION: 9200 N. ORACLE ROAD MATERIAL: NATIVE SAMPLE SOURCE: B-2 @ 2 - 3' JOB NO: 24588 WORK ORDER NO: 1 LAB NO: DATE SAMPLED: 12/20/2004 ONE-DIMENSIONAL CONSOLIDATION PROPERTIES OF SOILS (ASTM D2435) INITIAL VOLUME (cu.1n) 4.56 FINAL VOLUME (cu.1n) 4.35 INITIAL MOISTURE CONTENT 4.1% FINAL MOISTURE CONTENT 12.4% INITIAL DRY DENSITY(pcf) 115.4 FINAL DRY DENSITY(pcf) 121.0 INITIAL DEGREE OF SATURATION 25% FINAL DEGREE OF SATURATION 90% INITIAL VOID RATIO 0.43. FINAL VOID RATIO 0.37 ESTIMATED SPECIFIC GRAVITY 2.65 SATURATED AT 1 ksf 10040 99 98 c 97 Z 96 O 0 95 C O C0 94 •O U) C V 93 92 91 90 0.1 1 10 Vertical Stress (ksf) PROJECT: CDO BAPTIST CHURCH LOCATION: 9200 N. ORACLE ROAD MATERIAL: NATIVE SAMPLE SOURCE: B-5 @ 2 - 3' JOB NO: 24588 WORK ORDER NO:1 LAB NO: DATE SAMPLED: 12/20/2004 ONE-DIMENSIONAL CONSOLIDATION PROPERTIES OF SOILS (ASTM D2435) INITIAL VOLUME (cu.1n) 4.56 FINAL VOLUME (cu.1n) 4.20 INITIAL MOISTURE CONTENT 1.6% FINAL MOISTURE CONTENT 13.5% INITIAL DRY DENSITY(pcf) 111.5 FINAL DRY DENSITY(pcf) 121.1 INITIAL DEGREE OF SATURATION 9% FINAL DEGREE OF SATURATION 98% INITIAL VOID RATIO 0.48 FINAL VOID RATIO .. 0.37 ESTIMATED SPECIFIC GRAVITY 2.65 SATURATED AT 1 ksf 10040 99 98 m 97 a� .Q +• 96 0 z 95 C 0 ,a 94 �0 v) C 0 93 92 91 90 0.1 1 10 Vertical Stress (ksf) PROJECT: CDO BAPTIST CHURCH LOCATION: 9200 N. ORACLE ROAD MATERIAL: NATIVE SAMPLE SOURCE: B-6 @ 2 - 3' JOB NO: 24588 WORK ORDER NO:1 LAB NO: DATE SAMPLED: 12/20/2004 ONE-DIMENSIONAL CONSOLIDATION PROPERTIES OF SOILS (ASTM D2435) INITIAL VOLUME (cu.in) 4.56 INITIAL MOISTURE CONTENT 2.1% INITIAL DRY DENSITY(pcf) 110.3 INITIAL DEGREE OF SATURATION 11 % INITIAL VOID RATIO 0,50 ESTIMATED SPECIFIC GRAVITY 2.65 FINAL VOLUME (cu.in) 4.11 FINAL MOISTURE CONTENT 13.2% FINAL DRY DENSITY(pcf) 122.3 FINAL DEGREE OF SATURATION 99% FINAL VOID RATIO 0.35 SATURATED AT 1 ksf 10040 99 98 97 aT S 96 O 0, 95 C O c 94 •O N U 93 92 91 90 0.1 1 10 Vertical Stress (ksf) PROJECT: CDO BAPTIST CHURCH LOCATION: 9200 N. ORACLE ROAD MATERIAL: NATIVE SAMPLE SOURCE: B-7 @ 2 - 3' JOB NO: 24588 WORK ORDER NO:1 LAB NO: DATE SAMPLED: 12/20/2004 ONE-DIMENSIONAL CONSOLIDATION PROPERTIES OF SOILS (ASTM D2435) INITIAL VOLUME (cu.in) 4.56 FINAL VOLUME (cu.in) 4.27 INITIAL MOISTURE CONTENT 2.6% FINAL MOISTURE CONTENT 12.9% INITIAL DRY DENSITY(pcf) 112.8 FINAL DRY DENSITY(pcf) 120.7 INITIAL DEGREE OF SATURATION 15% FINAL DEGREE OF SATURATION 92% INITIAL VOID RATIO 0.47 FINAL VOID RATIO 0.37 ESTIMATED SPECIFIC GRAVITY 2.65 SATURATED AT 1 ksf 10040 99 98 97 A 96 .E O c 95 v C O 94 �O (N C V 93 92 91 90 0.1 1 10 Vertical Stress (ksf) CDO BAPTIST CHURCH TEST RESULTS LMT PROJECT 24588 GRADATION & PLASTICITY TEST RESULTS LABORATORY TESTING PROCEDURES Consolidation Tests: One-dimensional consolidation tests are performed using "Floating -ring" type consolidometers. The test samples are approximately 2.5 inches in diameter and 1.0 inch high and are usually obtained from test borings using the dynamically -driven ring samplers. Test procedures are generally as outlined in ASTM D2435. Loads are applied in several increments to the upper surface of the test specimen and the resulting deformations are recorded at selected time intervals for each increment. Samples are normally loaded in the in -situ moisture conditions to'loads which approximate the stresses which will be experienced by the soil's after the project is completed. Samples are usually then submerged to determine the effect of increased moisture contents on the soils. Each load increment is applied until compression/expansion of the sample is essentially complete (normally movements of less than 0.0003 inches/hour). Porous stones are placed on the top and bottom surfaces of the samples to facilitate introduction of the moisture. Expansion Tests: Tests are performed on either undisturbed or recompacted samples to evaluate the expansive potential of the soils. The test samples are approximately 2.5 inches in diameter and 1.0 inch high. Recompacted samples are typically remolded to densities and moisture contents that will simulate field compaction conditions. Surcharge loads normally simulate those which will be experienced by the soils in the field. Surcharge loads are maintained until the expansion is essentially complete. Atterberg Limits/Maximum Density/Optimum Moisture Tests: These tests are performed in accordance with the proscribed ASTM test procedures. TitleNo.: AZ-FCOP-IMP-N/A-1-16-51005338 APPLICATION FOR THE ISSUANCE OF CONDITION OF TITLE REPORT Applicant is in the process of investigating the Ownership of and defects, liens and encumbrances against an Interest in Land. As a component of that investigation, Applicant hereby requests the Company to furnish Applicant with a Report based upon the hereinafter defined Title Instruments, which Report will disclose the Ownership of and defects, liens and encumbrances against the hereinafter identified Interest in the hereinafter described Land. Applicant does not at this time need nor desire the benefit or protection afforded by a Policy of Title Insurance. The Report provided will be solely for the purpose of facilitating Applicant's investigation and for the sole use and benefit of Applicant and may not be used or relied upon by any other party. The following terms when used in the Application and the Report shall mean: a. Applicant — The party or parties who have executed this Application and who are named in the Report. b. Company — The Title Insurance Company making the Report. C. Report — Condition of Title Report. d. Land — The real property described in the Application. e. Interest — The Estate in the Land described on the Application. f. Ownership — The Vesting of title to the Interest identified in the Application. g. Title Instruments: Documents recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of the County in which the land is located reviewed by the Company to facilitate the Company's issuance of title insurance policies excluding therefrom, however, any documents pertaining to (a) unpatented mining claims, (b) patents, (c) water rights, claims or title to water, (d) the lease, grant, exception or reservation of minerals or mineral rights. 2. Documents, obtained by the Company to facilitate the issuance of title insurance policies, relating to the payment of Real Estate Taxes levied on the Interest in the Land excluding therefrom, however, any special assessments which are not collected by the Tax Collector for the County in which the Land is located. 2. The Land is described as follows: See Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. The Interest in the Land is a: o a. Fee o b. Leasehold created by o C. Other 4. Applicant specifically instructs the Company to set forth in the Report only the Ownership of and defects, liens and encumbrances against the Interest in the Land as disclosed by the Title Instruments. Applicant understands that during the course of preparing the Report, the Company may become aware of other matters pertaining to the Land or other Interests therein. Even if the company knows or would have reason to know Applicant may have an interest in these other matters, Applicant imposes no duty or responsibility on the Company to disclose those matters to Applicant either through the Report or otherwise. BY THE EXECUTION AND SUBMISSION OF THIS APPLICATION TO THE COMPANY, APPLICANT ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES: Condition of Title Report a. That the Company's sole obligation under the Report, and this Application, shall be to set forth the Ownership of and defects, liens and encumbrances against the Interest in the Land as disclosed by the Title Instruments. b. That the Company shall not be obligated under this Report to pay costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses incurred in any action, proceeding, or other claim brought against Applicant. C. That the Report is not an abstract of title, title opinion, preliminary report or commitment to issue title insurance. d. That the Company's liability under the Report for an error or omission is, as stated below, limited and that if Applicant desires that the Company assume additional liability, a Policy of Title Insurance, Binder, Commitment, or Guarantee should be requested. e. That Applicant shall have no right of action against the Company, whether or not based on negligence, except under the terms and provisions of, and subject to all limitations of this Application and the Report. f. That the Report is not valid and the Company shall have no liability thereunder unless this Application is attached thereto. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY APPLICANT RECOGNIZES THAT IT IS EXTREMELY DIFFICULT, IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE, TO DETERMINE THE EXTENT OF LOSS WHICH COULD ARISE FROM ERRORS OR OMISSIONS IN THE REPORT. APPLICANT RECOGNIZES THAT THE FEE CHARGED IS NOMINAL IN RELATION TO THE POTENTIAL LIABILITY WHICH COULD ARISE FROM SUCH ERRORS OR OMISSIONS. THEREFORE, APPLICANT UNDERSTANDS THAT THE COMPANY IS NOT WILLING TO PROCEED IN THE PREPARATION AND ISSUANCE OF THE REQUESTED REPORT UNLESS THE COMPANY'S LIABILITY IS STRICTLY LIMITED. APPLICANT AGREES WITH THE PROPRIETY OF THIS LIMITATION AND AGREES TO BE BOUND BY ITS TERMS. THIS LIMITATION IS AS FOLLOWS: APPLICANT AGREES, AS PART OF THE CONSIDERATION FOR THE ISSUANCE OF THIS REPORT, THAT THE COMPANY SHALL BE LIABLE TO APPLICANT UNDER THIS REPORT SOLELY BY REASON OF AN ERROR OR OMISSION BY THE COMPANY IN FAILING TO SET FORTH THE OWNERSHIP OF AND DEFECTS, LIENS AND ENCUMBRANCES AGAINST THE INTEREST IN THE LAND AS DISCLOSED BY THE TITLE INSTRUMENTS, WHICH ERROR OR OMISSION BY THE COMPANY HAS CAUSED LOSS TO THE APPLICANT; AND THEN THE LIABILITY SHALL BE A ONE-TIME PAYMENT TO APPLICANT OF FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($5,000.00). ACCORDINGLY, APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT THE REPORT BE ISSUED WITH THIS LIMITATION AS A PART OF THE CONSIDERATION THAT APPLICANT GIVES THE COMPANY TO PREPARE AND ISSUE THE REPORT. APPLICANT CERTIFIES THAT HE HAS READ AND UNDERSTOOD ALL OF THE TERMS, LIMITATIONS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS APPLICATION. EXECUTED THIS day of (This Application must be signed by the Applicant or an agent representing the Applicant.) APPLICANT: Print or Type Name Signature AGENT FOR APPLICANT Print or Type Name Signature Condition of Title Report MAILING ADDRESS: Telephone MAILING ADDRESS: Telephone Fidelity National Title Insurance Company Title No.: AZ-FCOP-IMP-N/A-1-16-51005338 CONDITION OF TITLE REPORT Fidelity National Title Insurance Company, a California corporation, herein called the Company, SUBJECT TO THE TERMS, LIMITATIONS AND CONDITIONS OF THE APPLICATION FOR THIS CONDITION OF TITLE REPORT, WHICH APPLICATION, OR COPY THEREOF, IS ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF REPORTS To the party named in Schedule A, that as disclosed by the Title Instruments, the ownership of and the defects liens and encumbrances against the Interest in the Land are as shown in Schedule B. Any claim or other notice to the Company shall be in writing and shall be addressed to the Company at the issuing office or to: Fidelity National Title Insurance Company Claims Center PO Box 45023 Jacksonville, Florida, 32232-5023 Attn: Claims Administration THIS REPORT IS NOT VALID AND THE COMPANY SHALL HAVE NO LIABILITY HEREUNDER UNLESS THE APPLICATION REFERRED TO ABOVE, OR COPY THEREOF, IS ATTACHED HERETO. Countersigned by: Authorized Signature ar •' SEAL Ranayo,trk,President Attest fAchael Graaelle, Secretary Condition of Title Report Page 1 Title No.: AZ-FCOP-IMP-N/A-1-16-51005338 Reference No.: CONDITION OF TITLE REPORT SCHEDULE A Fee: $0.00 Date of Report: March 23, 2016 at 1. Name of Party: CANYON DEL ORO BAPTIST CHURCH INC., AN Arizona non-profit corporation 2. The Interest referred to in the Application is: A FEE 3. The Land referred to in the Application is described as follows: See Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Issuing agent for Fidelity National Title Insurance Company Condition of Title Report Page 2 Title No.: AZ-FCOP-IINIP-N/A-1-16-51005338 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF PIMA, STATE OF ARIZONA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: All that portion of that certain parcel of land in Section 24, Township 12 South, Range 13 East of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Pima County, Arizona, as described in that certain Deed filed in Docket 1356, Page 491 in the office of the Recorder of Pima County, Arizona, and more particularly described as follows: COMMENCE at the Northeast corner of (G.L.O. Brass Cap) of Section 24; Thence turn South 0 degrees 04 minutes 03 seconds West along the East line thereof a distance of 119.35 (119.53 feet record) to a G.L.O. Brass Cap; Thence South 0 degrees 03 minutes 08 seconds West along said East line, a distance of 1988.63 feet to the point of beginning, said point being distance North 0 degrees 03 minutes 08 seconds East 545.00 feet from the East quarter corner of said Section 24; Thence North 89 degrees 59 minutes 35 seconds West, a distance of 1258.16 feet; Thence South 19 degrees 44 minutes 38 seconds West, a distance of 230.53 feet; Thence North 70 degrees 15 minutes 22 seconds West, a distance of 49.00 feet; Thence South 19 degrees 44 minutes 38 seconds West, a distance of 4.00 feet; Thence South 70 degrees 15 minutes 22 seconds East, a distance of 49.00 feet; Thence South 19 degrees 44 minutes 38 seconds West, a distance of 296.68 feet; Thence South 89 degrees 59 minutes 35 seconds East, a distance of 1078.86 feet; Thence South 0 degrees 00 minutes 25 seconds West, a distance of 45.00 feet; Thence South 89 degrees 59 minutes 35 seconds East, a distance of 358.26 feet to said East quarter corner; Thence North 0 degrees 03 minutes 08 seconds East along said East line, a distance of 545.01 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. APN: 225-10-064C Condition of Title Report Page 3 Title No.: AZ-FCOP-IIIP-N/A-1-16-51005338 CONDITION OF TITLE REPORT SCHEDULE B Fidelity National Title Insurance Company reports that Title Instruments, on the date hereof, disclose: Ownership of the Interest is in the name of: Canyon Del Oro Baptist Church, Inc., an Arizona non-profit corporation The following defects, liens and encumbrances (which are not necessarily shown in their order of priority) against the Interest: A. Property taxes, which are a lien not yet due and payable, including any assessments collected with taxes to be levied for the year 2016. B. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document: Purpose: highway Recording Date: March 18, 1952 Recording No: Docket 442, Page 497 C. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document: Purpose: ingress and egress Recording Date: January 17, 1964 Recording No: Docket 2209, Page 90 D. Any action that may be taken by the Arizona Department of Transportation to acquire right of way and access for State Highway, as disclosed by Resolution of Establishment Recording Date: February 21, 1978 Recording No: Docket 5717, Page 971 E. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document: Purpose: telephone and telegraph lines Recording Date: July 1, 1979 Recording No: Docket 5813, Page 909 F. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document: Purpose: gas and electric lines Recording Date: July 12, 1978 Recording No: Docket 5816, Page 745 G. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document: Purpose: Recording Date: Recording No: electric transmission lines July 26, 1978 Docket 5826, Page 914 Condition of Title Report Page 4 Title No.: AZ-FCOP-IMP-N/A-1-16-51005338 SCHEDULE B (Continued) H. Matters contained in that certain document Entitled: Gift Deed Dated: May 22, 1980 Recording Date: June 3, 1980 Recording No: Docket 6292, Page 974 Reference is hereby made to said document for full particulars. I. Matters contained in that certain document Entitled: Quit -Claim Deed Dated: December 18, 1996 Recording Date: December 19, 1986 Recording No: Docket 7935, Page 1897 Reference is hereby made to said document for full particulars. J. Matters contained in that certain document Entitled: Deed and Assignment of Easements Dated: December 18, 1996 Recording Date: December 19, 1986 Recording No: Docket 7935, Page 1899 Reference is hereby made to said document for full particulars. K. Matters contained in that certain document Entitled: Quit -Claim Deed Dated: December 18, 1986 Recording Date: December 19, 1986 Recording No: Docket 7935, Page 1906 Reference is hereby made to said document for full particulars. L. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document: Purpose: utilities Recording Date: March 12, 2004 Recording No: Docket 12257, Page 1114 M. Matters contained in that certain document Entitled: Memorandum of Assignment and Assumption Agreement Dated: September 10, 2004 Recording Date: December 3, 2004 Recording No: Docket 12441, Page 3974 Reference is hereby made to said document for full particulars. Condition of Title Report Page 5 Title No.: AZ-FCOP-IINIP-N/A-1-16-51005338 2 P N R. SCHEDULE B (Continued) Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document: Purpose: Private Sewer Joint Use Agreement Dated: December 6, 2005 Recording Date: December 8, 2005 Recording No: Docket 12696, Page 2483 Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document: Purpose: water lines Recording Date: September 27, 2007 Recording No: Docket 13149, Page 5 Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document: Purpose: water lines Recording Date: September 27, 2007 Recording No: Docket 13149, Page 8 Any action that may be taken by the Arizona Department of Transportation to acquire right of way and access for State Highway, as disclosed by Resolution of Establishment Recording Date: June 3, 2005 Recording No: Docket 12566, Page 581 and amended Recording Date: March 15, 2006 Recording No: Docket 12761, Page 242 Tax Note: Year: Tax Parcel No: 225-10-064C (Taxes are exempt) The following matters are disclosed by name only and the Company, without additional information, is unable to determine whether any or all of these matters are defects, liens or encumbrances against the Interest: 1. Note: This Condition of Title Report does not address General Index matters (such as proceedings, liens, or decrees), which do not specifically describe said Land. Condition of Title Report Page 6 F. ANN RODRIGUEZ, RECORDER RECORDED BY: NUB DEPUTY RECORDER 3AZDT 1134 ES2 AZ DSPT TRANSPORTATION 205 S 17TH AVE MD 6129 PHOENIX AZ 85007 DOCKET: 12566 yos�yiM_ F'AGB: 581 NO. OF PAGES: 8 w 1;x S3QUENCE: 20051070214 U 0610312005 r`O�t.RES 10:31 MAIL AMOUNT PAID $ 9.50 MAY 20, 2005 RES. NO. 2005-05-A-033 PROJECT: S-077-A-800 / 0772M07'711545901R HIGHWAY: TUCSON - ORACLE JCT. •- GLOBE SECTION: Calle Concordia -- Tangerine Rd. ROUTE NO.: State Route 77 ENG. DIST.: Tucson COUNTY: Pima RESOLUTION OF ESTABLISHMENT VICTOR M. MENDEZ, Director, Arizona Department of Transportation, on May 20, 2005, presented and filed with this Transportation Board his written report under Arizona Revised Statutes Section 28-7046, recommending the establishment and acquisition of additional right of way for the improvement of a portion of State Route 77 as set forth in the above referenced project. The additional right of way to be established and acquired for *his improvement is depicted in Appendix "A" and delineated on :raps and plans on file in the office of the State Engineer, Intermodal Transportation Division, Phoenix, Arizona, entitled 30% Design Plans, dated March 22, 2005, TUCSON - ORACLE JCT. GLOBE Highway, Project S-077-A-800 / 077PM077H545901R." WHEREAS establishment and acqufs-tior of the additional right of way is necessary for this improvement; and WHEREAS because of these premises, this Hoard finds public safety, necessity and convenience require the recommended establishment and acquisition of the additional land needed for this imorovemen--; therefore, be it ,,ESOLVED that the recommendation of tt,e Director is adopted and made part of this resoj.ution; be it further RESOLVED that the portion of right of way as depicted in Appendix "A" is hereby designated a state route; be it further RESOLVED that prior to construction, the acquired right of way be established as a state highway; be it further. 6 6 p0 5 8 1 Page 1 of 8 0410 Vlt` 3 9:50 AM MAY 20, 2005 RCS. NO. 2005-05-A-033 PROJECT: S-077-A-800 / 077PM077H545901R HIGHWAY: TUCSON - ORACLE JCT. - SLOBE SECTION: Calle Concordia - Tangerine Rd. ROUTS NO.: State Route ?7 ENG. DTST.: Tucson COUNTY: Pima RESOLVED that the Director is hereby authorized to acquire by lawfu'. means, including exchange;, in accordance with Arizona Revised Statutes Section 28-7092, an estate in fee, or such other interest as is required, including material for constriction, haul roads, and various easements in an propert incident.al to the improvements as deiineated on csaid -maps and plans; be it. further RESOLVED that the Director secure an appraisal of the property to be acquired and that necessary parties be compensated. Upon failure to acquire said lards by other .lawful means, the Director is authorized to initiate condemnation proceedings. 12 5 6 6 0 0 5 8 n G Page 2 of 8 04/01/2016 9:50 AM 15 784 9 ,SW 163 6 9 98 64 67 89 91 m = Q' 64 Mohave: a 93 Co nino 264 66 g 89 61 Q •—% 68 99 40 ; 87 19 95 89 89A l 71 Z 61 _ 93 Yavap I 89a J 40 a2 95 17 y9 377 e 9 96 6 26 77 ,61 89 69 .., 217 La Paz ' 7 1 260 1 • 95 72 60 •"•• 88 288 - - 261 87!' 60 73 ai 10 60 C ------•-- ,Mari pa 't .. •• i 95 87 ' 60 91 Yuma 38 1 al l72 '. ' • 70 111 e 64 87 77 ;Gra 9 75 �9 so 85 �_... j 766 , .....LO .. 266 .; 19 AREA OF ESTABLISHMENT 66 ma - •'- SEE SHEET 2 OF 2 10 186 FOR DETAILS 5 1AL THIS PLAT WAS DIGITALLY PRODUCED FROM ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GENERAL HIGHWAY MAP n: ccc RIGHT OF WAY PLANS SECTION w REVISED MAY i7. 2000 wwvvv V'V"INI-- 266 �w. C 82 ac 92 Santa Cruz APPENDIX "A" 077 PM 077 H5459 OIR / S-077-A-800 TUCSON - ORACLE JCT - GLOBE HWY. Calle Concordia - Tangerine Rd. Pima County DATE: MAY 20. 2005 SHEET-. 2 OF 2 I La Colla � Blvd ate, � � •.. � a Q n,; al � d p a �. `, c~D cD La Q. C1 Canada D �D -. a o g zu a TOWN (DIF Q. Northern Ave ©R OI cn S.R. 77 1st THIS PLAT WAS DIGITALLY PRODUCED FROM ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GENERAL HIGHWAY MAP a � o (y o ORIGHT OF WAY PLANS SECTION -06 REVISED JULY 17, 2000 Igo n -+. 00 3 qpQunc)ci Ci�Q-�TICJF-` E MENT APPENDIX "A" R 13 E. R14E. l •\ Lo L N .R. 77 077 PM 077 H5459 OIR / S-077-A-E TUCSON - ORACLE JCT - GLOBE HWY. Cotle Concordia - Tangerine Rd. Pima County DATE; MAY 20. 2005 SHEET: 2 OF 2 MAY 20, 2005 RES. NO. 2005-05-A-C33 PROJECT: 5-077--A-800 1077PM07'IH545�;O1R HIGHWAY: TUCSON - ORACLE JCT. - GLOisE SECTION: Call.e Concordia - Tangerine Rd. ROUTE NO.: State Route 77 ENG. DIST.: Tucson COUNTY: Pima R-71:1O7T AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE HONORABLE ARIZONA TRANSPORTATION BOARD: The lntermodal Transportation Division has made a thorough investigation concerning the establishment and improvement of a portion of State Route 77 within the above referenced project. This portion was previously established as a state route and state highway, designated U.S. Route 8C & 89, by Arizona Highway Commission Resolution dated September 9, 1927, page 26 of the Official Minutes; various Resolutions established additional right ct way for improvements thereof; subsequently Resolution 92-08-A- 056, dated August 21, 1992, renumbered arid r.edcsignated U.S. Route 3 to State Rotate 77. Additional right of Way is now -:e:edcd for widenir.y improvements which will have a positive impact on traffic operational characteristics for the graveling public. Accordingly, it is necessary to establish and acquire the additional right of wafor this pro ect. y The additional right Of way to be established and acquired for this imprcvelner.t is depicted in Appendix "A" and desigeated on rr,aps and Mans on file -n the of rice of tt:e State Engineer, int.ermodaL Transportation Division, Phoenix, Arizona, entitied "30% Design Plans, dated March 22, 2005, TUCSSON - ORACLE JCT. GL,OBF: Higtlway, Project 5-077-A-800 / 077PM077H545901R." Ir, tre interest of public sa`ety, necessity and convenience, T recommend that the area depicted in Appendix "A" be established and improved, as a state rouge and that the area be established as a state highway prior to construction. l 6 6 0 5 8 5 Page 5 of 8 04MI12016 9:50 AM MAY 20, 2005 RES. NO. 2005--05-A-033 PROJECT: S-077-A-800 / 077PM077H545901R HIGHWAY: TUCSON - ORACLE ACT. - GLOBE SECTION: Calle Concordia - Tangerine Rd. RCUTE' NO.: State Route 77 ENG. DTST.: Tucson COUNTY: Pima I further recommend the acquisition of the new right of way, material for construction, haul roads and various easements necessary for or ncidertal to the im_/rovement. Pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes Section 28-7046, T recommend the adoption of a resolution making this recommendation effective. Respectfully submitted, VICTOR M. MGNDEZ, Director Arizona Department of Transportation 1 5 6 6 0 0 5 Page 6 of 8 04101/2016 9:50 AM MAY 20, 2005 RES. NO. 2005-05-A-033 PROJECT: 5-077-A-800 / 0'1'7PM07'7H5459013 HIGHWAY: TUCSON - ORACLE JCT. - GLOBE SECTION: Ca'Ie Concordia - Tangerine Rd. ROUTE NO.: State Route '77 ENG. DIST.: Tucson COUNTY: Pima CERTI7ICATION I, VICTOR M. MENDEZ, Director of the Arizona Department of Transportation, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy from the minutes of the Transportation Board made in official session. on May 20, 2005. IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and the official seal of the Transportation Board on May 20, 2005. Z'- - �-Z2 �/� �/' &: - - VICTOR M. MENDEZ, Director Arizona Department of Transportation 1 2 5 6 6 p0 5 8 7 Page 7 of 8 04/01/2016 9:50 AM APPROVED »noy for ap nmont of irnnin. .e-_ Date S 0 0 5 8 8 Page 8 of 8 04l0112016 9:50 AM 5TATf: OF AR►ZONA 1 1 hereby ! OUNTi' OI' o•IAf ) u' instrunm u, P,nu 1 warN•'sf rah• hand an.l ()ffici,l seal Itulc�ttt P, ,eJ 8k,tteJ Iw.J .I s'i page Date JUL 26 1978-11V.AM / �aa,t ..f. d- T5W cAS s �L�CTRtC cc::rtsY Sty va. Fre Rtc}•T or wAT LAsI.''mzxT r-_;) THIS INQP.r:T1 ryil', mule this and hHuren ,1N170,YA F.LI :TRII: COMPANY, an dnro; .orrvr,ti. n, party "( the s.., 1J,att:�ttY--of IIw fir% ban, and 17'lSON; GAS tl Vlr11NFCt�'t'llr 111at thr rl � � alono,wllr,IJttd, ha a- t,•rsnls,l and t uilled.+ml 1,ylINV partrf!rss,1. Itrvj ,tJiL gr+nind knl�rw rrruninhicl Mlo�yt+rty of Illis y ecchtul (all, ltt 41tri'�e l and +ttlJtllt, + flpltt tof tl+t ur r+esnwnl in, on, 1hnal'g gr&n, env►, +rid +,racer l tullo, I'Ar deaf Ifivd Nndt I,H IUP jrnrl�nit UI 1,111NIIn11r1Jt, nlepr+111% and Ilia1411sInIII# +u th�hn Itslltntlttit111 n/ 411wil911lon Una of t1UYn1 Illurtrull hNL'l1Ott F,1tF..Mp, QNLY A 5 "rat wi a --strip of land located within a portion of the south half of the NE'of Section 24, Township 12 South. Range 13 F.ast, CC::RRCM, Pima County, Arizona. Said strip .5 feet each side of a c being 3enterline more particularly described as follows: Commencing at ti:e southwest corner of that certain real property described in Rook 135ti at page 491 thereof; Ittence S 890 59' 35" F. a distance of 750 feet to a point, being the TRUF. POINT OF RF.CrNNING; thence IN0" 2' F. a distance of 40 feet to a point. being the terminus of the herein described centerline. Said seotrd party is hereby granted the right and privilege to own, construct, operate, and maintain said electric line or a'*S' in, on, thrc,ugh, under, over and acrou Said'"" estate with all poles, crossarms, conduits, pals, pullboxes, enclosures, ca',Icot wires. Joys, Supports, fixtures, arttfioM stays and devices used .,r useful in the construction or operation of said ling to permu the attachment of wires and fixtures of any other company, and to do all other matters and things convenient or expedient tilms. to in the construction or operation of an electric line, to construct and maintain tele),hooe circuit, to enter upon uid premises at all from, to trintefree$ or otfier�ir, replace, enlarge, operate, control, and use card lines to remove objects or obstacles there• growths interfering or dangerous to the operation of sad line, re to remove the wM,l• or any cart of uid hoe u the discretion of said party of the scmJ pan. Grantor reserves the right a cultivate, oat and occupy said n art of wvy except that withotu the print written approval of Grantee. the Grantor shall not erect any ten:Js(rary or),emunent busid- in or structure on the property which will be in conflict with the National Electrical Safety Code or any revisions thereof. The undersigned covenant_ that 4ta4st_4C_the Owner —of the above JoKnluJ land, and that uid lands arc free of encumbrances and liens of whatsoever character. ezcept those held by the following persons: TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the woe unto the uid party of the second pan, its tuansora and assigns forever. JAY :I year NESS above WHEREOF. the sad pan-y._of the first put ha,Lhereunto act - *Ljj& hand _and sesJ _ the STATE OF ARIZONA ) County of Pfau ) sw 7hls instrummt WAS ad Ibe-1�21Al dayof_: My Commlakwl a rirpt, FOQw logo Alm 1/to. CP AA At undersipW notary public. by f•., Iv w' iR Im - 58AmwO914 STATE OF ARIZONA COUNTY OF PIMA 'I j!LII—% my hand and hereby certify that the within +tnlrucni was filed for record Na County. Slate of Arizona ILIA M,,*t ISMYI CN Mnty Recorder RIGHT Or WAY EASI-M6%'r PALO MDE BAPTIST CEM OF TU CK, ARTZONA N41, 073T1tt IM,ok , Sft Page7V Date: JUL 12.1978.-mggAM ...... iv �rV�tr�J•' ' h �_���Tu1L Ciufl:�:Y Fee:* and valuable comideration, the receipt of which is hereby hereinafter called "Grantor." for good ELECTRIC COMPANY, an Arirona coY acknowlcdgclt, hereby grant and conveys unto TUCSON GAS do Of way to comtnrct, operate, and maintainounderground electric line% and appurtenant facilities for the Iransmess �n axMsors and assigns. hcrcinificr c fled "Grantee.** an oJ d triand bht lion ib electricity upon, thrwrgh, over, trrxler, and acne% the lands and any aril all parcels and portions thereof hereinafter described, The lands in which said casement and right of way is hereby granted arc owned by Grantor in fee simple, are situsted in the County of Pima. Ssc -State of Arizona, and are particularly described as follow%• to wit: A 10-foot wide strip of land, being 5 feet each side of a centerline located within a portion of the East Half of the NEk of Section 24, Pi tllu, l3 East, Gd.SRBdPimapatticTawnuthip]ar1123rSodescribedthRange sa follows: '�, Arizona, more Commencing at the East p„tarter corner of said Section 24; thence N 890 59' 35" K, along the south line of the NO of said Section 24 a d4atance of aP rwcimatelY 1172 feet to a point, said Point also being 348 feet east of the easterly Right of W ay of the Tucson -Florence Highway, and the TRUE POINT OF BM � f he said centerline; MrM of the thence in a northeasterly direction a distance of 210 feet to a point, said point lying 320 feet east of the easterly Right of Way line of the Tucson -Florence Highway, and the Terminus of the herein -described centerline. alter.rantee shaft have the right In cxca%atc for, place• lay, constntet. operate, u%e, maintain, repair, replace. recon%tntct, enlarge. i(;mprove, add In. relocate. and, or renwve at any time and from time to time, underground electric facilities therein con%i%ting of conduit%, manhole, handhole%. p1111M,%r%. and junction Mr%e with wire-, and cables placed therein, and above ground %trtictures con%i%ting of tran%fornicr pads.. Irarofurmcr%, %crvice prdetal.. ri%e• poll•% with required overhead conductor%, and appurtenam'es nccc%%ary fur the operation of uaid underground facilities And all miwcllaneous equipment and material connected therewith. Grantee %hall have the right of ingrc%% to and egre%% from wid easement by a pracucat rouur rove% in, upon, Over, and acrer%% the hcreinlxfore dc%cribcd land% tit am p +ruin or portion% thernd, together with the right tote %tear and keep clear said ra%cment and right of way, from r%phri%s.. material-.. building,% or other %Iructurr%, implement%, Air oMh11, lion+, without limiting the gcnrrality of the foregoing. hall dip . plant buil.lingr wall' knee Airtoth other lturr`",it 11111pt Ind tit %title thlid%; qd ar material% sill in 1 rwbka ndarie, ,( the aM+vse. orrigmion ditch. a fc%crihrd easement ;Intl right of war. riranror %hall not ncleaw Air decrease the ground %urf4ee elevation% within the htuttwlarirs tit the Above decrib+cd ra%emenl and right Of way rsi.tint at the dour of e%cctrtiun of Ihi% instnment, nor %hall the -aid ground .tirface hi: prnetrllef to a depth in titre% of 12 inches I+v a" Mil or implement, without the previuu% written eon%cnl of the (iran4r. If whseyuent lu can%true• than, the borne by or Itrafr i.%bunged in such way as lu reyulre relocation OI the undrrgroah+i (acdilir%. the cost of auh rek%catlun %hill be l+clet- by (irnnor ar mbsryurnt owner. All rlrrr +rat eyuipnenl imtalletl by (;rantee in and upon the herein described rawnicnl %hall Iemain the per.lnud property If 'he (ir.+ % .,ml %hall nut he lecmctl a part of the rcelly, ave t tit hei still of wasle iilwhrnrvdrsinllhrantrr!+l�ulknlentlthc %am1r11uhn11nd risiq% 1 he nra�%;u�'llor here+avrith"''Il dawlc rIfecrib ( Ill right hen in gnultrd A-88578 6/12/78 •1• 5'81.6h.:0'i45 Cram. shall amt without tint /raat a dedicate any other ease P� CrsateeY rwittta aPProral. the rV4 to a y fee dot �aa desarhed saseaseat and of wa y Jr-aw to the craatee. �P tl� s � sndl. traad4 etfar" sad wager to Granger the eschuhy t to ea+ematt sad t of �r fw whole . lwaRed ouad sPeewAeat heniahe a b Gtmt �ed war ~ ~ t+.ietrlady se�far i siettritali diattiln�n hecweea Graar. sad Geaates Cragttse shall bare the r�ht dauiat coasawct;oa of er.acee•. iakial ficNi cosrrl,rS the real ptOPeKr herein Kttietion. a strip of fand___lp__fsst is w{ddt ties, to use f. the strip to be in whole. in part oa either aide l said past and contiptous to the ierein aawd a ol"irgclrFol to raid eo d terwiaated at via tiaae ry tafd �. easement aad risks of wa y sad coo of sra -9 T1ge ems, corenanta and coed ttwea�t+rtetiow is caspleted, 1. said ri�hc to we rdd snip of land taarlu� brig; saecators, admiaypof" was sad right of war shall ha�,d__ The rem -Creator» shad Ott ek P a6". or asai6a of Grant. as t6 u Q �� of the Grantee to ehe pioral o► the sia�ular Or awter v dw ai tie c wherein A ct: anal in the abyolar a i. the aertsr `ends shall SWr IN MgTNESS MIiEREOP, t4 Grantor h,...rad theae pe .Ca.s},y day pA%0 Vag g'n= flit K OF TUC SCK wR� ngmet e STATEOF 1147120AIA 1• OOUNPy OF t?I ,t A This iaatnarneat was ackno ' wied`ed before sae, the aadetsipr°d swtsrr Ptb$t. by u o � ..� .n 7 •,,r ,* e roar ssua .t .rem 19l v , v 071689 of f'fit1A� j � � is�� f11M for nogrd2... t Mad aad • State al kteMy se.r S % 13 9/O MA MAE stet rp:;,. L 0 719iA I'u .sl Fm .e nvoi. The twAra gored Memo Nod eadt and all of them IfMM AM mid for and % aeeeldWS*n of _Tan anddaillem the neMp trhereot y here4y �, hereby tl�. fe en to hand w by the daeMae, . daeMee, Ms T �"h fir• a Colaade cerpo.a*, "1 1 Danwr. 1O conetnlR oPMaM, nrintaln endi 188 r—sm &W n �a a ky Eaanwm and NN rlplr oo"wwr**G and O*W fadMims, fear time b 8me, as GUWWI 0vr 'a0t"G"WvApW" k'ft~ , carder and Wm eha foNoM 4 eypibs land whtds M» danbr trMeteat, ta+wfh An underground easMent and rtghtro as shows on Exhibit "A" attached he sto and by this ret*renca ttlade a part hereof, In the following described land, said easetsent and right-of-way to be ten (10) feet In width being five (5) feet Issa- surod at right angles to each side of the center line thereof as shown on :are drawings. The following described parcel is the land which shell ben on said d said ossaatant and right-of-way;to That portion of Lot 1 of Section 24, Townshlp 12 South, Range 13 East C. a S. R. `• a M Pete County, Arizona, lying ustarly of the relocated Tucson -Florence Hightway, Federall SecSecondary Project 111: EXCEPT the North 30 toot eihlaee in the County of pile SfaM Arizona TOGETF�R wNh pie d** of Inr -0d egreu over and eana the laetds of the Grantor to and from the na°taery a"da"d hermit other �q dared all tees and 0*W a may be for dutr utipty purpoeft a>r Wee to vN the right a/ way jointly with Geamee Gm"W wwfth do rights hreiTwv" gr OOC Met and ouhivate said propsety Afor purposes not k+oonaiatent Signed and cWheeed *k t " d y ot�Td.✓E wr br.. Ti.',::r •41++e+w w IY t71 fw ! N l I- M wa 1014W M Ir 0a State of /1 Cy of?� j 1e. p` _ TAdA/ ' •• • . - the ...:, i- M1' Conunh:.'04 [z,,::ns ;,i a 23, toil i"2rtc O CSYY U REASON FOR R[ISJUY I ISSUY OATS Al 1 'SfL.�2E IC>�w10% tGSEn�E►�T. 3 WIII.I. vzrz ti= z�c •• �y 3 � ti .. ' EXN/BIr;r N Jt5-rc , ----� t^ b � � a 7 d w t -•r--- 1 � o � 1 5813PA:EO910 rro.jact F-031-1-911 "hti-0lWME JUINCTION-GLOW :lIammy Febrrary 1, 147R Ina :toad - ^angerine Road Resol.:itioh 73-03-4-1:; RESOLUTION OF nS AIt',ISfi:"i:'iT +. A. ORDWAY, Director, Arizona Department of ►ansportation, has this 3rd Day . of February, 1979, presented and filert with this Transportation Board :iis writtnreport under ",ction 28-1864, Arizona Revisecl Statutes, reconmen+ting the r-.rovetnent of a portion of she Tucson -Oracle Junction -Globe 1',lhuay, ina Road - Tangerine Road Section, U.S. R9, s. R. 77, ^roject n-031-1-till, Pima Connty, State of Arizona. The portion of highway recommended for iriproverent is ercrihed and eepicted in Appendix "A", and is further delinnat-!d 'n the maps and plans on file in the office of the State " winner, Highways Division, Phoenix, Arizona, entitled "Right of Mans, Tucson-orar.le Junction-r.lobe Iliohvity, Pro III". ject F-031-1- 'mrREAS, acquisition of said right of way is necessary for thy- improvement of said highway; and 10=11EAS, because of these premises, this Board finds that ':utlic safety, necessity and convenience require the recommended improvement of said highway, as delineated on said maps and .,Ian::; therefore, he it 7r,OLVr..D that the recommendation of the Director -is adopted ird made a pair'_ of this resolution; be it furt:ier RESOLVE►) that the improvement be done according to said maps -arid plans and that the Director is hereby authorized to acquire c)y lawful means (in accordance with.section 28-1865, A.R.S., as ar•ended), an estate in fee, or such other interest as is required, including material for construction, haul roads, and various easements to any property as necessary for or incidental to the improvements as delineated on said maps and plans; be it rurther !t1:SCLVED that the director secure an appraisal of the rrooerty to he acquired, and that compensable damages to the owner's remaining lands be assessed, and that necessary parties IV compensated. Upon failure to acquire said lands. by other lawful means, the Director is authorized to initiate condemnation proceedings. 5 17puE09•71 Project F-031-1-811 ' WSM-ORACLE •JL?Ji.'TI03-GLOBE NIGHtf.A.Y February 3, 1773 Ina Read - Tangerine Road. Reconaendation 79-03-A-nR r Y. C O M 7S L '7 D A T I O U TO TUR /'OVORAUr ARI?.O%A ':RAMSPOP.TA'"IO`: BOAP^: -'1e 'cUcThways Division has made a thorough investi(-ation concnrninn the establishment and improvement of a portio:. of the :'uc>on-Orocle .junction -Globe Highway, Ina roa;i - Tangerine Road, •• A9, :'.ii. 77, Project F-031-1-811, Pima County, State. of .rizona, as previously established in the official minutes of the r.rizona Highway Cc:.uaission, March 11, 1949 anti November 9, 1953. Accor4ing'.v, it is now necessary to. acquire ad.litional night of .•av for tire improvement of said highway. " c area require(: for this improvement in described and •' ristec: in Appendix "..", and is further delincat- on the maps ..r glans on File in the office of tale Stat^ Engineer, Highways "ivision, Phoenix, Arizona, entitled "Right Of 111"y Plans, Tucson- -:)racle .7uric tion-rlobe 11iy11way, Project F-c131-1-811". :., thce interest of the public zafety, necessity and corv,tnience, I recommend that th^ portion of the highway, as 'cscrill-I ant: .:cpicted, be improve,?. T further recommend the acquisition of the new. rights of �'av, material for construction, aaul roat7s, and various t:ascments. .',rrsuant to rection ?.P-1364, Arizona Revise(? Statutes, I recort:•end the adoption of a resolution na';ing effective t:1is rPc-nmrutntlation. Respectful} submitte.t, W W. A. ORDZW 1Y, nirec r Arizona Department of Transportation 5717PgEO9t72 y :.' 5'�1'�►09'73 R. 13 E. T 1? S. T. 13 S. THIS PLAT WAS PHOTOGRAPHICALLY REPRODUCED FROM — MNFRAL IIIGIMAl MAP PIMA <xri'� 1'1'1 ARIZO \A Y4.wA N.+A�w.w. b .AAN.p..At.Ow �••OT0611AMM(TIIV ANO MA1►INQ i[I.VIC[3 U.1 O(FARTM(NT 01 TI.ANfwORTATION .[O(I.AL MIQNWAV AONI.IIS111ATION I.?$ R. 14 E. u_.�_. .. __ . Au APPENDIX IIAII Project F-031-1-811 TXSOM - ORACLE JCT - GLOBE HWY Ina Road - Tangerine Road 1-13-78 Scale 1w 2 ■i. Sheet 1 of 9 TUCSON-CRACLE JCT-GLOBE HWY tM.oO-TAMGCIhNC LLDFlu COVNTT _ lk LI'U.YdtIV& 1 �'\ lam: f t, {/�) _ •, ' \ LJ I� ! �.� L . .a wt .. 'fix, _ _ . _ - — -•� -- --'-re -- --� 7. 41 • �� ice• + �-_..� .�. � `r.. � .r..•.,d �.. a. + _ � �.` , APPENDIX A ..�\ E ;_y pEt AREA OF AMA&TION i1 1 r t ran 1 _ - l.. •• .�eri r. rwa j 1i+J.':.{M yf Orj it Af .. J� . ,�' * � •yam � • .• � r.n '..r .+ � ,, . � �.. r _ ��• . .:�•;,r•.� '2. ` ' a+I .� � .. , •� l r.wi 1� `' w.r AF111s � t� t •..w .�, .. •h' ti. � .lar.�••. t. i :ii,..w.�w i t � (r-lt�i:t: S � t' _"-t!.7. a_. i � �. �—..a__... - � � � Rom, . i.ve•ww � � l �,.. ii �.a. �; _ , - ...-.r►t.—,,; — — ..... � ,-Y, =.a^ _.s�.�as.c:. � : -.�.:.r,.c_.�t - -•= _ : _ ._ - 3n�'- ...,.sA�:.7""". i`.- 'r _- _ _ _ _- �••• •�ar'....J ' .v,. Y. �'�_a�•`r—a.-... ... '.. �.•.r •_� •�{/�)�Q.— ' � { �. r..M �Y.tpr. rM•A. �.M 71 APPENDIX A �. • f: a AREA OF ACQUISITION OM 3 r TUCsCr.•ORACLE JCT-GICSE NWT h.%o0-•AAGER!NE RO • • :T� tOUt.•r t Arm ,. r�i ! y t t ! u•'R•. !'+'.a'•.•e ".d ter -a. -�=�' ..a .j d.. �.. M:..•+-r.,. •.h +.rr�r,y� i , , � '• t •,!, •� y.• ..nor ..�...►•••� • � , r..-.5.:��+ti+a►._ ,: �'T�•—��'..^-�...-__" . _ -.. �••cam' ' 4'4rA w i 1 •' ' • 1 y t i APPENDIX A •'�'` r AREA OF ACOUISI NON UM I TUCSON-ORACLE JCT•GLr78 INA RD'TAWRiN[ RD PIMA COUNT► 0 YL • � ..s� rr ►.. '•.�.► 1t It ue*`--..;,::..i.:.;.:._== ===='-•R�"--^ =- .a-.._.."==.:.a.r:- ,:.......: '. •IL �"�-'f `�L.-sTYf�ri/�/l�ll�' 7 •..•Or r., r 1 • T • :. , a.-.. Y C Ir �•" APPENDIX A +AREA OF ACOUISITIOH mm�,' , •� 1. LO ay� TUCSCN•ORACLE J:T•GLOtE►UlY OAAD-T►NAR,'K no looll ^_ r t / r s� •F►r...r \ `t •i •' •1 .,�,i , �r:��T •� .. i �1"•� • •• • \ .r..• . Ste_ � , r •' •.. 1�. • :7 ...--- -_... '.r—LL •;•-SS._�.�r.�--.. �C�r. .•r•- •�.•�.-.. nrasuianr�w. .,,N _Z-�- �- „�r:.. •, �e � t��T�7�7��LS?S'.. � -... a_ nMR".Yr"'—...'7+urt'�TTT�_ Wt �-� APPENDIX A AREA Of ACOUISITIOH •r,1 TUCSON•ORACLE JCT-GLCOE HWY' INA RD•TANGEMNE A) hMA COUNTY/ uw ntt� arwt Hutt► i .. l \..• •r aa,\/\�N r •.i �•.l.• i•M'.wY r� ` , j!%� YN:w • :• + r•rw� ha W :vw j�e Y• � � �f�i' � s � • � '. HJIr .•.•dM ',�� M awnrr� Mir f ♦J•irlA' r}rr NM ' � ,,l .:, "' � •' Cam' � �-,�"' �" .•n. �r^•\..•.o - �' i L�i�''�,r•rrr 1.. a\CA 'ter` !7.• ��, �'J'�w.►rtw.�.r. �r .•.. rr. 4.. `hywrt � .rtr � p' � ►r• � r, !r fir' ��- l a r'"'r"-11!• ��y'�-/5r\ �,�.�.Tr« ..� � � a. Y."r �'T• " � � f �,. rr�--�� �, 1 •:r--��"f.. _�1�� -- 'ram �'i aw 1 L_. �.K. - a.es--=�.—�. �•,w.. .dv�+n _- ..'.��-�"Tr�... hit= f �w [ r•hl.rr •Y •swr[ ,t \ •;Iaa,rrl « '1\r•� ♦%+•/Ar I }•.•rV ♦ war[ AI)•Mw . u � YnI Ml �rw••+ Y APPENDIX A AREA OF ACQUISITION a jM Cow APPENWX A AREA OF ACOUISiT*M MM it, tzw-vwoc rrRT. RO •TANGENNIE 114 FWA CGUF#TT i .os�aoN Nus.cTf � �' 1 �''r •fir y I •. 1 J� i 41 w \ NX _.A.__- SITION EM f er f.LY Project`"p "'lJrs0::-oP,ArLC Ji' .,c —11c*;-r.S.OiiJ: Ina Roac'_ - HIGHWAY February 3, 1978 .ar�,`rine �,.on,: Pesolution 78-03-A-08 _ -irector, AriL'Una Department a , •'o 1creb •:w•rtif + P nt o_ 1^• ••ortation Y y t.iat *.ham foretrning is a tru,+ :orrect copy from the ainutns of t-he mransportstion Board in official rlssion he 3rq day of February, 1771S. T ! .Z", &T;O?' rcrave her -wilt set rly hand and tha is jai al of the .•ransportation ,-..oar+? ttiis ard wlay o: '• ")DaAY, '�irector 'r" i::nn3 ,�w �artment of ^ran ortat p ion 5 717-Act0ow 017080 0.0 t..,:;,e try � oed Ind OINrM IIN /h And ►tit gem wilts IDA MP 0MNM1 a* Mwft OWN r - L CtN St. � � TWs UC W VMb ad.MW ba bw aid dsw, 't' Ccstslealoa, PAPA YBRDB Ba??ZScsmws T f- X_; lalo horde Ave.. TuCaon,Arisom faeeir�sr eeieW tl ArI6 DaIesetoswt MOR e0g bavb by ad aewrp ibs THAT ' V Liateser jr ajr estasr et bat bwb lw Wwresd: add latoff of the t+ 11f 1: � to ram` is 4w WO the Pa. izs v " ad eWrese «ear jLMeaartla, valor .tb orW juQ}at Lcrrteeltar� d rwW #roelnwsat a Yl f�r,'i i IR Ibe WealMntaW move.* fee aii is'umtNaatlr'iC ire a ejt dr p1. D F ad' dw j.:5" :*'!aesago b do Lteaaee atepia dW eeea nd levetoaor bebatter Eaa�w -.,in 1set4 eaW on". to so .r jam • �e:am aW tse she NNW of mime ar.ruesed, » erAss t■ Md UPM �Ye fdtta� cweWrel a[ t!e Leeee+see; ta�eter .. •A :iectioa 24, Township 12 South lEtq a 13 But,Sc Lot lj atb 550' of Worth T�9.53 ' of But 300', as shots on* plat attached ber�eto and invade a part theTeof, Oils; -mad : Salt River.a�d ,.. p Co=t n . 3tste ;af Arizona. ". Pfr !=►TM-. 1500' Sta. 5W To RAVI A" TO not— aw sow rr� tfoe o�enrietiar � �Teosoa.ir2oranci r_ _. ......., _ hair 7M LX== is st► }et tot a !silnr6� L Z>se iww� anew to PW to'tb LftWWW dW 1000weog aeoeea116 exapyhd ea brek. laettbl'sNorat d foc i casrattietaoa *Wft;wamp am at a emb soin of emu W ten too �or 5 Der ctt. Td. for impart Borrow. 1W per Sdoet'Ag~e Dare Gown =1 i IWW ,AWvgeea: . scow d 10 omen yae tam jloe out d sie aowooes >r iw iee.d w :.so of speo�d des fitter oaspletiow of L 0 the prrod d Lod .rohioLnr� ` fit be "a � nn edw gerpow tare the nsoeii•ef cord aeaettvetb W hr tear iw aloe oowreeucejes el shirr SMOSed �trjece. ��oe1n1.Ycrrt seditj bovis oownsre dtaa L! «rs.te..d.. Pa' t tWe. to matt Wildbaoigdud to tie. It la further vinde:stowd and a~. Ust. 'vca. ea■pletioa of haaiiag Taaterial frog this area th* beaks of tho pit aba11 be backsloped and pit left is s nea and burned. t ,eaedltion. • An brnsh.lsi tbIJ pit area .&hall, be stookpIled $. It Is. also trrAM that the exotVa►tun sball come no nearer to the DWAGS �1 test bole. TU& tans.rOqU42tad due to a future purred ALL. grad aroettir�s toyeir;uata�erW r1s5 beGRAM -Isq <>se lror!!s Clow b ek o.i ereearreos fie f�oArtert of upon see snssre to nd �— . OW aY �walrt __ b» .._.grid tYw /owr¢a to be d Nie drT Awa04/2 . ftAU OP "=VA. by at at .:....... ...... __ C�iet kt ttgr y�at � 4t►-9ll f-si. _ + -� t 9.17 PIN r _� � �- ;_ �: -�F .tyt�+red Project 8•111 countr rim much 12 .......- ..... „ lls.....2 near.. 105 i w a, E. -4� S �E M E N T ,0 ` R �f"y7 �t � �RC - �' TA1ss lfltDlMV1t>i± �aAt tih lltb/ar et Hniar7s 19$2//Lp ald between BXXMN and AUA L JOLZOM* B"band, and Mir* - (�IwreiaafATr C eAi.I9:ONA.�hereinafter UW and THE STA O deatsaaaM the Granted itMTALS: 7%0 Cranle• regvirea At r 1,t of wa perpetual eameawnt bn a lon�ia� bo the Grantor, 9 •���eee t11 Of land be- twblle h the °ur cotnttrrct and r�aintsin thereafter a k1►wa7, and all fncidlats thereto 7%e Grantor does herdir,"t to,t".O�anty� x-, erseeteat for welt subleet hewetm to the razz atie,. nsi oom tostain�r said Craator r' w does hereby appa!!e ier � rd ldtlivar asd oot�r►1br,ts the.eata�tLltmmt thereof orer laid Iutd. a:. data hereby release the aatd State st A "momm- o th sad m—m all claim for daiaa=e ar ectsf •' irtstlou for and as ac! ownt of ti:e rsta Aflzoma xnt and court alwo of said h[Away other.than e,t forth he•reis. COMIDIMATION: In tanaideswtbn of lice y[e siw. oo*etisalbr; aft "tonditlaas io 1se the htpt and perfoMed by- tGTxt+tec and the further eotrider gun of the am>s of TfIO: Q.,g:A}d�II.Rt1Q_xlQr(IOQ..._�_.. -Dollars the granter does hereby- pant a perpetual eaaeesest, and doer by these prrsenta Convey to the tm. the Grantee forever, that certain aft!µ, tract, or parrel of tam and r.al elate ■ittlateli in land bring a part of the ... of .. dretion _... ....... .. 2k, _ . .........lilliolim Townahip?MW�m 12 ,South CIIa and Saft Rh rr Umw and Moedlan_ i Ar(:onA %rid rarcel of tan,4 required for htt;fivmy "r{�:4ta►�=�raT beiltd .... '11 . 100 tent ati tf+E:._,...�/liCl'1T . " ,.side or.... ... feet on the .....04htgZi7 tidy- of, pa ei and sdjicent to the relocated."center tin. of the. _ •- a itlatb ltiratwa?•, as acid centeriiqe a K ' the tit' : mR� # ►'4i. as fhbwi on the map oriraW highway In the office of Me Ctate, atr ll. j..: ,fy t'rgiseer A.uW bMWmoff vsitlenlaAr described sa follows - All that poa'tio>d of lbii D} >.'!' Section, , t'outiship 12 not, Ftaaao 13 ltaats;l'lia'170tltitT r;�A!'1iDnt+.tilt. o � aZiot� 'TUCC-3D- Ylorotsa• Hi�awy.a>;fd:"ik'ttth .�stat�Liott of titir iar'cb ]San as Lot ; ,_fit Lltada;liala :Qitsds. ?!mots jbi `2:. aoaordiaif to the " t� 0 2*oord bi the-offloat as rho CW=tr.# ,trtboor, 43i It 6 ti! tT ltao90! "1,�latt! nilLS>�t,tbo . ZOii r ' �Q rlt4ttt at 7 Ddp ^91. thlNl'i�fj 1 Wit. tbri`. rilaaat 'lti"Ah , .. • , !"'�"M&M.ir 'bl E,too ?1'es •ot: lllw'. The laolo'aat; t+ato>w sty of .said may, ba"oriw da : Zollata ! ,r .yyam� t 16089 altlw t2ra of::felt oa elm, felt Qt � �la�•OO�iI � 7_ �." Maas Ls 4 nwab` 916 " 114 oft rrtp 1 _o,�• �Etlid�1",� . ta>f�+si�tato 501.117 "t wistar o tbt%` rt aafi(` tbalr.ori at kV 1� ' r ieaa e y ! tLa�x * ads a n #1+ ttbsstl t i�a . tr > a •t i ' k 11144"orlbott �rsrssir ". tt t 442 as a DataR "SW p*- P. Sl' twii '!+s-• �,r 1�, tdaia as RSQer, -t i �la T?_ 2ta.._V_y 89' ��. .W-1 s. s+at ownoeaont>>NsLor veer 1.1 tees !e It ott.�Mi^- a tyi� aft .aorta 1T. dMewtLay.: msbz w. r • one••inah sapped p3rl tii#t�•t W7:7 fbet to to a &ten FIAtut sba !" Iitd+a e! yot ` j was,, .0 tees raw 21. ownaa aartit 0e S� �, riata Tracts S7" .dart! h0 fast, s+aq_, plies of betimiye. Campriaias an area on,26 1us aert%;� >•os±a oaf TO HAVE AND TO HOLD tbR samse !stayer. htetb*r wl* a rigM � a�selu. per. and Bevan the we thenof not hlceaL�ent .wltb its � eN d a highway sad o. per. racy rights of way ores. upon sad &Craw lauds of the Graatnr that a�ay be sway M to pe. the Grantee of. or w� h� �_ On t"Air of saw byb-ay. tx+aeide3 tw the are attached to all light a iad interta grsetrd Ah{� lowing stipulations which ran with and CONDMONS: I. It r wdeestood aad:ap�,tiat the aamooat at Athttosed Rswht is stetp�� �the Greater as tali cosaDrwtios for the lead takes Man or way sad is be, fe1 alt cWaa for dunnage, a for ittjary. or is too cestiguoos stag/ trout *Meh the rWW of -+ray is se III - "W owsai by Grtstot, and ter kk acts" and osteorrno is htwwi of. that may hereafter Into ar MAR free the CSrAtssttios, alteration and raahrtOMWe of thR read bed. its erabaskYsent al. gvstd ,, , 2 It is agreed that wt6e+' cAtt1% 1tnord !>ay. ft Dlaee to t et Station 510+00 .shall %4 retrotiod a�dre�`anaesooted on the xaet,srlY_ relocated right or va�;�tno left `vr IIi �:� tters�s station 510+00. Rim Standard barb. t•3re fetee.bafl bo aotittraetad on the relocated right of tear, lir•+ thrGUO thi _Orfttor%S ,oroporty. THAT AU. GRANT& COVENAM AN' p PROVISIONShRrrfa coet&h ai ehati be WA_ on and inure to the btaef5t of the being, petereeCr� and sn Ill of the p"tLg ijento. IN WITNESS VIRER L)F, this iCdrj�Of bag bees. doly'dpred and a#aeuted by the Crantor the day and Year above writ m X . �,,.,1....� . .. STATis OF Arlsona A. c'tyt;-m or -!uricopt.. . This'In,dn Rent was duty ackmm idOW befate aw this 6th.:d&y at_�._ , 193. 2 . b7 -; CSARLis3.1i.: �.i�01t. aai..:iit • E. � 1'0 -... »... fnr the purpose sad constell4tion tbetrrta eaell4uod. 4 _� .__.__... �i)' cearaataslos lsphres• . 77 � At ......... .......".. ma* 1953 Accepted: RATE Olt ARIMICA 2 'Ch!of R1 .; •af WaT O S' " VU Aritoa& fit Way At:� # rt Y r tilATE OT AB IFA i but entrfj' teat the �dtlils r COUNTY of rrw, �ami w" n te: t, , OS 679 m wane a m b' �'" C°�44'. ataa at Atisnts� r hand and OtrleW tt.aL Jot "b"o see Indexed pasft( Comb, ltacordar �t—.�=!��n+':,4 1 iMA (n�►�LQ �. QIUNtl�6►1 .».... UN'[Y _ t GT?'T"DEBq . PALOFor the consideration of our Christian love and affectio I here na ft BAPTIST CHURCH, INC., an Arizona non-profit corporation,n, we, C7 hereinafter referred to as transferor, do convey to, CAIJYODELOR BAPTIST CHURCH, INC., an Arizona non-profit corporation, hereinafter Ui referred to as transferee, the following described real property situated in Pima County, Arizona: All that portion of that certain parcel of land in Section 24, Township 12 Sout)t, Range 13 East, B.&S.R.B.iM., Pima County, Arizona, as described in that certain Deed filed in Book 135a Of Dockets at Page 491 in the office a• the Recorder of Pilri County, Arizona, and more particularly described as follows: Commence at the Northeast Corner (6G.L.0. Brass Cap) of Section 24; thence turn Sout)I 0004103" West along the East line thereof a distance .of 11q.35 (119.53) foot Record) to a G.L.O. Brass O Cap, then South 0003'i)8" West along said East line a distance of 1,988.63 feet to the point of beginning, said point being distant 00 North 0003108" Must 545.00 feet from the East Quarter Corner of said Section 241 thence North-B9''q9135" West a distance nL 1,258.16 feet, _ thence South 19°4''38" West a distance of 230.53 feet, thence North 700151220. West a distance of 49.0a feet, thence Routh 19°44';t8",W*st a distance of 4.00 feet, thence South 700151220.Mast a distance of 49.00 feet, thence South 190441380 best a'distance of 295.69 feet, thence South 81039'35" Mast a distance of 1,078.86 feet, thence South 0 $q'2S".West a distance of 45.00 feet; thence South 89 59135" East a distance of 358.26 feet to said East Quarter Corner: thence North 0003'08" East along said East line a -distance of 545.00 feet to'the point of beginning, containing 15.84 Acres (subject to the restrictions as delineated on the attached Exhibit "A")$ SUBJECT TOt 1. The transferor hersin retains°;the righiof, Ingress/egress unto the property herein over ths`10cation through_the road presently located on the property: tors,thepurpos*',orrtuture improvements and maintenance of:!said read j `jit s.,. agreed; :th&t*_ the transferor and transferee to,share'a,proporiioaatar,part ot;,the.cost to be determined at a 2. An easement is rotainod - t by t�i tratfsfsmr tar x�reMsr=line, further that ingress and ,stress on�thiir"y rein iii�axl;,ba: allowed for the reasonable%6Ohstrudtioa necessary. In the-:swat=a;',Join>* r l it8ibO-Usedabymthebe parties heroto, , or ' thsir.-assigat, _that t11s_ eaosutrisctioa and maintenance costs of,such i •Aoiat ately born by the parties. a Trattstt:rss;�t`1 b•� proportion - at the northern boundrryy of o. ipatloh to nates Such documents as may; bs necossaw propszt dstdedytO thsrtransteree. Y, -ahalL-big s�nouted',bY:;;trrutateree to the transferor at the taste said r�sE= ; ttthta transferee. 3. The transferee agrsog to saintaLl a=3d• 6611strwt is tback of the northern boundary,: but lhs'pu�L3+ts=;bislagrrts.abis does not Preclude construction bi roildf:'gr �ttEin areas. withthe setback. 4. The transferor retains jb' sasett+irit right Per underground utilities to service the property north of the land that is deeded to the transferee. The location of said easement is shown on Exhibit A. But the transferor shall endeavor to accomodate the transferee's building program, and that the transferee shall execute such documents as may be necessary if the specified 20' easement in to be changed or realigned. 5. That the existing Deed restrictions of record, shall continue. 6. That the transferor shall maintain the right to a 15• corridor Of property on the Oracle Road side of the parcel herein to be used at their own discretion of whatever purpose necessrry. 7. The transferor retains the right to erect such signs as they deem necessary within a 50' radius of the Southwest entrance of the parcel herein described. 8. All taxes and other assessments, reservations in patents and all easeraents, right of way, encumbrances, liens, covenants, conditions, restrictions, obligations and liabilities as may appear of record. DATED this 22nd day of _.MY , 1980. CANYON DEL ORO BAPTIST CHURCH, INC., accepts the above -referred to restrictions, reservations and retentions. CANYON DEL ORO BAPTIS CHBYs CHURCH, INC. BYf��- a r n B Op L ERT - Se retary DATED this 22,A_day of �y , 1980. PAIR/VERDE BAPTIST CHURCH, INC. BYt/ 4r__55-47 B T G. DELFIi - a rman BY STATE OF ARI20NA ) A�WH�� - oe airman t ss. COUNTY OF PIMA ) ti- s This U.G. Utility Easement may be subject to realignment — see deed agreement. as Indicates area reserved for alga erection -- see deed agreement for other details. i 1 / � e � 4 ' t / : SO'EOGNfLYAIs 3ETb�C�C l/AfE / NiWrT' ` SCMF.! fdSENCUT •�� i : J .. ".' •f�.�f !Wi` c'17UMOIE/i!>�IX.vMD MAN E.SNL +kwti � t wIP ;` V s `r.. to rt LOW /� wi r:r19 !_ A r.. ♦ G�L� C'('�FMF+WTIA/TRIi21 i too •. _ ( .._rts'IvwoE onuTY SEWER EASEMENT a g l/NE F. ANN RODRIGUEZ, RECORDER RECORDED BY: CML og PIfq DEPUTY RECORDER p 1951 ES4 SAZDT y AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION��.�� 205 S 17TH AVE MD 612E PHOENIX AZ 85007 FEBRUARY 17, 2006 RES. NO. 2006-02-A-011 PROJECT: S-077-A-800 / 077PM077H545901R HIGHWAY: TUCSON-ORACLE JCT.-GLOBE SECTION: Calle Concordia - Tangerine Rd. ROUTE NO.: State Route 77 ENG. DIST.: Tucson COUNTY: Pima DOCKET: 12761 PAGE: 242 NO. OF PAGES: 8 SEQUENCE: 20060500073 03/15/2006 ARES 11:32 MAIL AMOUNT PAID $ 9.50 AMENDED RESOLUTION OF ESTABLISHMENT VICTOR M. MENDEZ, Director, Arizona Department of Transportation, on February 17, 2006, presented and filed with this Transportation Board his written report under Arizona Revised Statutes Section 28-7046, recommending the amendment of Resolution 2005-05-A-033, dated May 20, 2005, recorded June 3 2005, in Docket 12566, page 581, to show a design change. The amended right of way is depicted in Appendix "A", and delineated on maps and plans on file in the office of the State Engineer, Intermodal Transportation Division, Phoenix, Arizona, entitled "95% Design Plans, dated September 27, 2005, TUCSON- ORACLE JCT.-GLOBE, Project S-077-A-800 / 077PM077H545901R." WHEREAS the design change requires a modification of the area to be acquired; and WHEREAS public safety, necessity and convenience require the recommended amendment of Resolution 2005-05-A-033, dated May 20, 2005, recorded June 3, 2005 in Docket 12566, page 581 to show said design change; therefore, be it RESOLVED that the recommendation of the Director is adopted and made a part of this resolution; be it further RESOLVED that Resolution 2005-05-A-033 is hereby amended, and that the modified area of right of way is designated a state route; be it further 1 7 6 1 0 0 2 4 2 Page 1 of 8 04/01/20164:01 PM 8 FEBRUARY 17, 2006 RES. NO. 2006-02-A-011 PROJECT: 5-077-A-800 1 077PM077H545901R HIGHWAY: TUCSON-ORACLE JCT.-GLOBE SECTION: Calle Concordia - Tangerine Rd. ROUTE NO.: State Route 77 ENG. DIST.: Tucson COUNTY: Pima RESOLVED that the Director is authorized to acquire by lawful means, including exchanges, in accordance with Arizona Revised Statutes Section 28-7092, an estate in fee, or such other interest as is required, including material for construction, haul roads, and various easements in any property necessary for or incidental to the improvements as delineated on said maps and plans; be it further RESOLVED that the Director secure an appraisal of the property to be acquired and that necessary parties be compensated. Upon failure to acquire the lands by other lawful means, the Director is authorized to initiate condemnation proceedings. 1 2 7 6 1 0 0 2 4 3 Page 2of8 04/01/2016 4:01 PM L Mohave; 1 66 40 C 93 Yavap� ] 97 96 99 C LaPaz ' 71 ------------ Mari pa 34� 87 60 Yuma 238 �•i alr, 8 84 87 7 85 AREA OF AMENDMENT SEE SHEET 2 OF 2 FOR DETAILS THIS PLAT WAS DIGITALLY PRODUCED FROM ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GENERAL HIGHWAY MAP A O MIGHT OF WAY PLANS SECTION p u' REVISED MAY 17, 2000 o_ 86 - Santa Cruz 163 6 :564 91 d v a a 264 .o 87 > 19 z" r 277 61 91 260 6 26 0 261 (� 60 273 a1 a �3 d _ d 70 78 77 Gra 19 �5 366 l0 186 83 `1;0 80 181 Co hise al lqn APPENDIX "A" 077 PM 077 H5459 OIR / S-077-A-B00 TUCSON - ORACLE JCT - GLOBE HWY. Calle Concordia - Tangerine Rd. Plma County DATE: FEBRUARY 17, 2006 SHEET: 1 OF 2 I Q, 044N00 1-'uQH -A: La Collo Blvd ;., nQ, a O, •�• (� O• j. �Qb Q QOi 40i 1 Q �• Qr cp Q CL �p ti •� �' �7 � La Canada D o .;'•. O Qj a QL a d Q d V Qj a Northern Ave c) S.R. 77 imam,& er a THIS PLAT WAS DIGITALLY PRODUCED FROM ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION g -o GENERAL HIGHWAY MAP N" KHT OF WAY PLANS SECTION o REVISED JULY 17, 2000 4-41 m co M47 ,LJ00 Po - ao Q Q. R 13 E. R 14 E. Segment 1 M.P. 79.1 ' M. P. 79.8 ' N . R. 77 Segment 2 M. P. 82.1 077 PM 077 H5459 O1R / S-077-A-800 AREA OF 0 TUCSON - ORACLE JCT - GLOBE HWY. AMENDMENT Calle Concordia - Tangerine Rd. Pima County APPENDIX "A" DATE: FEBRUARY 17, 2006 SHEET: 2 OF 2 I FEBRUARY 17, 2006 RES. NO. 2006-02-A-011 PROJECT: S-077-A-800 / 077PM077H545901R HIGHWAY: TUCSON-ORACLE JCT.-GLOBE SECTION: Calle Concordia - Tangerine Rd. ROUTE NO.: State Route 77 ENG. DIST.: Tucson COUNTY: Pima REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE HONORABLE ARIZONA TRANSPORTATION BOARD: The Intermodal Transportation Division has made a thorough investigation concerning the amended establishment and improvement of State Route 77 within the above referenced project. This portion was previously established as a state route and state highway by Arizona Transportation Board Resolution 2005-05-A-033, dated May 20, 2005, recorded June 3, 2005 in Docket 12566, page 581. Due to design change, the area to be acquired has been modified. It is now necessary to amend the previous resolution to show the design change. The amended right of way is depicted in Appendix "A" and delineated on maps and plans on file in the office of the State Engineer, Intermodal Transportation Division, Phoenix, Arizona, entitled "95% Design Plans, dated September 27, 2005, TUCSON- ORACLE JCT.-GLOBE, Project S-077-A-800 / 077PM077H545901R." In the interest of public safety, necessity, and convenience, I recommend the amendment of Resolution 2005-05-A-033, and that the modified area of right of way depicted in Appendix "A" be established and improved as a state route. I further recommend the acquisition of the modified right of way, material for construction, haul roads and various easements necessary for or incidental to the improvement. 2 7 6 i 0 0 4 6 Page 5 of 8 04/01/2016 4:01 PM 5 FEBRUARY 17, 2006 RES. NO. 2006-02-A-011 PROJECT: S-077-A-800 / 077PM077H545901R HIGHWAY: TUCSON-ORACLE JCT.-GLOBE SECTION: Calle Concordia - Tangerine Rd. ROUTE NO.: State Route 77 ENG. DIST.: Tucson COUNTY: Pima Pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes Section 28-7046, I recommend the adoption of a resolution making this recommendation effective. Respectfully submitted, VICTOR M. MENDEZ, Director Arizona Department of Transportation 1 2 7 6 i 0 0 2 4- 7 Page 6 of 8 04/01/2016 4-01 PM (11 FEBRUARY 17, 2006 RES. NO. 2006-02-A-011 PROJECT: S-077-A-800 / 077PM077H545901R HIGHWAY: TUCSON-ORACLE JCT.-GLOBE SECTION: Calle Concordia - Tangerine Rd. ROUTE NO.: State Route 77 ENG. DIST.: Tucson COUNTY: Pima CERTIFICATION I, VICTOR M. MENDEZ, Director of the Arizona Department of Transportation, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy from the minutes of the Transportation Board made in official session on February 17, 2006. IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and the official seal of the Transportation Board on February 17, 2006. VICTOR M. MENDEZ, Director ,,;.. Arizona Department of Transportation 1 7 ..n 0 r. 0 4 8 Page 7of8 04/01/20164:01 PM 7 APPROVED i i 2 AM A�Npa�ls�nt �- Date Z ?� D(p 0 2 4 9 Page 8 of 8 04/01/2016 4:01 PM f i r • RICHARD I KEIIIIEDY, RECORDER, RECORDED IN O FFICIA1.IZECORI�s (IMEM 111 `TY. ARIZOIIA at the requ sr of EXECUTIVE Ti[LE COMPANY � Date j�j� `j 8 M Fs�O{ / D� Feo �+[l 8 S? Book PT Q6 —� When recorded, return to: Barbara L. Hinske, Esq. JDOURTESyRECO Lancy, Scult & McVey, P.C. �Q���A�1 j�j� 3003 N. Central Avenue Suite 2601 Phoenix, Arizona 85012 g IT -CLAIM DEED (Cable TV Company) FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF 'TEN DOLLARS AND OTHER VALTTABLE CONSIDERATIONS, FOOTHILLS CABLE & COMMUNICATIONS, INC., an Arizona corporation (the "Grantor"), hereby quit -claims to CANADA HILLS CABLE TV & COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, an Arizona limited partnership (the "Grantee"), all right, title, and interest in all real property located in Pima County, Arizona, including without limitation the real property located in Sections 23, 24, and 25, Township 12 South, Range 12 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Pima County, Arizona, Sections 1, 2, 3. 4, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13,.14, and 24, Township 12 South, Range 13 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Pima County, Arizona, and Sections 5, 6, 7, 8, and 18, Township 12 South, Range 14 East, Gila and Salt River lase and Meridian, Pima County, Arizona. .c The Grantor also hereby quit -claims to Grantee, without w covenant or warranty, Grantor's right, title, and interest under all covenants, conditions, restrictions, and negative easements N affecting the above -described real property or any portion thereof. Z If the validity or enforceability of this Quit -Claim Deed is held to be dependent upon the existence of specific legal descrip- tions for portions of the above -described real property, Grantor, on behalf of itself, its successors and assigns, agrees to execute and deliver to Grantee quit -claim deeds conveying to Grantee such specifically -described real property. DATED this lath day of December, 1986. FOOTHILLS E TV & C %OIC'A- TIONS, I an Arizo orpo-- ration / wo My Mgt' .N Lowell J. Williamson, Secretary 7935 1906 Page Iof2 04/011201611:01 AM STATE OF ARIZONA ) ) ss County of Maricopa ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this lath day of December, 198b, by George H. Johnson, the President, and Lowell J. Williamson, the Secretary of FOOTHILLS CABLE TV & COMMUNICATIONS, INC., an Arizona corporation, on behalf of the Corporation. My Commission Expires: c.i/!ol 1 o,") 0 3 1 3 b: I t 1 7 a 6 i 1 RICHARD 1, KENUEDY, RECORDER, RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS OF PI1AA COUNTY, ARIZO11A ' nl the request of EXECUTIVE TITLE COMPANY Date" -,t Fea . i90 fee 7 f $�+` P11!M ' +.�..W1,4-�Bno Pe ��URiESY RECOAl3ilYS3 DEED AND ASSIGNMENT OF EASEMENTS This geed and Assignment of Easements (the "Assignment") is made t'*,is 18th day of December, 1986, by and between FOOTHILLS CABLE & COMMUNICATIONS, INC., an Arizona corporation (the "Assig- nor"), and CANADA HILLS CABLE TV & COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED PARTNER- SHIP, an Arizona limited partnership (the "Assignee"). BACKGROUND A. Assignor entered into that certain First Amended and Restated Cable Television System Asset Sale and Purchase Agreement (the "Agreement") dated October 2, 1986, with Notre Dame Develop- ment Corporation, an Arizona Corporatiou ("Buyer"), wherein Assignor agreed to sell and Buyer agreed to buy certain of Assig-- nor', cable television assets and properties, as enumerated in the Agreement. B. Buyer has assigned Buyer's interest in and to the Agree- ment to Assignee, t C. Assignor owns and holds all of the grantee's interests in �. and to the easements discussed hereinbelow. ' D. Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, Assignor is W assigning to Assignee and Assignee is acquiring from Assignor Assignor's interests as grantee under the easements discussed hereinbelow. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, FOR TEN DOLLARS AND OTHER VALUABLE CONSIDERA- TION, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Assignor and Assignee agree as follows: 1 Assignor hereby assigns, conveys, transfers, and set over unto Assignee all of Assignor's right, title, and interest in drlcl to any and all easements encumbering or benefiting real property for the benefit and complement of Assignor that are located in Pima County, Arizona, including without limitation the real property located in Sections 23, 24, and 25, Township 12 South, Range 12 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Pima County, Arizona, Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 29, Town 12 South, Range 13 East, Giiu and Salt River Base and Meridian.. Pima County, Arizona, and SeclJorls 5, 6, 7, 8, and 18, Township 12 South, Rang,,, 14 East, Gila an,' Salt River Base and Meridian, Pi 3 County, Arizona, and also including without limita- tion that certain Declaration of Easement (Blanket Cable Televi- sion) made the 5th day of December, 1986, by and between Title Insurance Company of Minnesota, a Minnesota corporation, as Trustee under Trust Nos. 10,376 and 10,379, Atlas Southwest, Ltd.,, 79p" 1898 Page 1 of 0410112016 11:00, an Arizona corporation, Glenex Petroleum, Inc., a Missouri corpo- ration, Lifestyles Unlimited, Inc., an Arizona corporation, and D & L Investment, Ltd., an Arizona corporation (collectively the "Grantor"), and Assignor, as grantee, recorded in the Office of the Recorder of pima County, Arizona, in Docket 7926, page 1763 (the "Specific Easement"). .2. This Assignment shall inure to the benefit of and shall be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. 3. Assignee, on behalf of itself and its successors and assigns, hereby releases Assignor from all obligations of Assignor as the grantee under the Specific Easement and Assignee, its successors and assigns, assumes all of the grantee's obligations under the Specific Easement and agrees to indemnify and hold Assignor harmless from and against all costs and expenses incurred by Assignor in connection with the Specific Easement. The release contained in this Section 3 shall only apply to Assignor and not to Assignor's successors of assigns. 4.' Canada Hills Resort Site Limited Partnership, an Arizona limited partnership, Canada Hills Development Limited Partnership, an Arizona limited partnership, Canada Hills Golf Course & Country Club Limited Partnership, an Arizona limited partnership, and Canada Hills Commercial Site Limited Partnership, an Arizona limited partnership (collectively, "Canada Hills") are the succes- sors in interest to the dominant tenement in the Specific Easement. Canada Hills is executing this Assignment for the Purpose of releasing, on behalf of itself and its successors and assigns, the Grantor from all of Grantor's obligations under the Specific Casement and Canada Hills, its successors and assigns, hereby ag numes all of the Grantor's obligations under the Specific Easement dnd agrees to indemnify and hold Grantor harmless from and against all costs and expenses incurred by Grantor in connec- tion with the Specific Easement, The released contained in this Section 4 shall only apply to Grantor, and not to any of Grantor's successors or assigns. -2- 7935 1900 Page 2 of 04101/2016 11:00 , IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties 'lave executed this Assignment as of the date set forth above. ASSIGNOR: ASSIGNEE: FOOTHILLS C LE & COMMUNLC 'P NS, CANADA HILLS CABLE TV & INC., an zona corpo at' COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED PARTNER- SHIP, an Arizona limited part- \ A 7( nership By: eorgepr. Johrpon, t`Presiden "1 well J. Wi liams�», ecretary AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED this 18th day'of December, 1986 by the undersigned. CANADA HILLS RESORT SITE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, an Arizona Limited partnership By: Canada Hills Management Limited Partnership, an Arizona limited partnership Its: General Partner By: Canada Hills Develop- ment Corporation, an, Arizona corporation Its: Managing General Part e ByOvice Krumwiede, Pr silent CANADA HILLS COMMERCIAL SITE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, an Arizona limited partnership By: Canada Hills Management Limited Partnership, an Arizona limited partnership Its: General Partner 'CANADA HILLS CABLE TV & COMMUNICATIONS, INC., an Arizona corporation, its General Pa t er 9— . Krumwie e, Vice President 7935 1901 Page 3 of 04/0112016 11:00, BY: Canada Hills Develop- ment Corporation, an Arizona corporation Its: Managing General Partner By: C 'j umwiede, ce President CANADA HILLS nEVELOPMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, an Arizona limited partnership By: Canada Hills Management Limited Partnership, an Arizona limited partnership Its: General Partner BY:'Canada Hills Development Corporation, an Arizona corporation Its: Managing General Partner C. rumwie e, ice Pr sident CANADA HILLS GOLF COURSE & COUN"'I"RY CLUB LIMITED PARTNER- SHIP, an Arizona limited part- nership By: Canada Hills Management Limited Partnership, an Arizona limited partnership Its: C'eneral Partner BY: Canada Hills Develop- ment Corporation, an Arizona corporation Its: Managing General Partner 6ce *Pre wied , t -4- 79 . :. 9 02 Page 4 of 04/01 /20I G 11:00 , STATE OF ARIZONA ) ) ss County of Maricopa ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me- this 18th day of December, 1986, by George H. Johnson, the President, and Lowell J. Williamson, the Secretary, of FOOTHILLS CABLE & COMMUNI- ;CATIONS, INC., an Arizona corporation, on behalf of the Corpora- tion. My Commission Expires: STATE OF ARIZONA ) ss County of Maricopa ) Ct t Notar ubi' The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 18th day of December, 1986, by Craig L. Krumwiede, the Vice President Of CANADA HILLS CABLE TV & COMMUNICATIONS, INC., an Arizona corporation, on behalf of the Corporation as the General Partner of Canada Hills Cable TV & Communications Limited Partnership, an Arizona limited partnership. My Commis ion Expires: tv/�! �v STATE OF ARIZONA ) ss County of Maricopa ) Not Pub 'C o-npAL sEU nfFAZY BELT � rrJr4�r rt"!LC-ARQOIq -= ICQPA COLpRp ;r; •'�,-:: 6cPIR� Apr 11, IM The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 18th day of December, 1986, by Craig L. Krumwiede, the Vice President of Canada Hills Development Corporation, an Arizona corporation, the Managing General Partner of Canada Hills Management Limited Partnership, an Arizona limited partnership, the General Partner of Canada Hills Resort Site Limited Partnership, an Arizona limited partnership, on behalf of the partnership. My Commission Expires: 7935 1903 -5- /'/FC• /"'� 'g.:' PFFAMY BE1T IWAV roeua-ry M WRICOPA COtWi1► Page 5 of �� •Y Corm. Erpltt� Apra?I. I490 04101/2016 1 1:00 , ,. 1 STATE OF ARIZONA ) ) ss County of Maricopa ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this lath day of December, 1986, by Craig L. Krumwiede, the vice President of Canada Hills Development Corporation, an Arizona 'Corporation, the Managing General Partner of Canada Hills Management Limited Partnership, an Arizona limited partnership, the General Partner Of Canada Hills Commercial Site Limited Partnership, an Arizona limited partnership, on behalf of the Partnership. My Commission Expires: STATE OF ARIZONA ) ) ss County of Maricopa ) Note Pubil'c 9M] ThR foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 18th day of December, 1986, by Craig L. Krumwiede, the Vice President of Canada Hills Development Corporation, an Arizona corporation, the Managing General Partner of Canada Hills Management Limited Partnership, an Arizona limited partnership, the General Partner of Canada Hills Development Limited Partnership, an Arizona limited partnership, on behalf of the Partnership. My Commission Expires: qr b r 7935 f904 Nota PubL+:•A, ornmAL am c TUFARY BELT )� MOOIA7llt!!!C-Mun^ lfAR1M COU„ hA Comm. Eg1M Aw . ass- ,6_ Page 6 of 04/01/2016 11:00 STATE OF ARIZONA ) ) ss County of Maricopa ) The Eoregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this lath day of December, 1986, by Craig L. Krumwiede, the vice President of Canada Hills Development Corporation, an Arizona corporation, the Managing General Partner of Canada Hills Management Limited Partnership, an Arizona limited partnership, the General Partner of Canada Hills Golf Course & Country Club Limited Partnership, an Arizona limited partnership, on behalf of the Partnership. My Commission Expires: a a: 0 1 6 I 2 1 7 a 6:: �e-V c_ f Nota 'Pub11c UAL Tl MY BELT R=. q11-Z- MARICOPA COIR�IY `sir C:rr: E-t•�-� .1�r �1 1990 r .....:-, ny r 793�c' ''- Page 7 of V l? 04/01/2016 11:00 , 40 When recorded, return to: Barbara L. Hinske, Esq. Lancy, Seult & McVey, P.A. 3003 N. Central Avenue Suite 2601 Phoenix, Arizona 85012 R, !1,1RD J. KENNEDY, RECORDER, RECORDED III DRICIh RECO ,S� A[ VAC U uc5t a' EXECUTIVE TIM CO„A',ttlY � Oat �I�7n� b�i�Ynas-al Bea Pit 4RP�h Tea �007 _ f7c) Fee 0� 92L". T-CLAIM_ DEED (Water Company) COURTESY RECORD[O NO JITLE WAINK(a FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF TEN DOLLARS AND OTHER VALUABLE CONSIDERATIONS, FOOTHILLS WATER COMPANY, an Arizona corporation (the "Grantor"), hereby quit -claims to CANADA HI%LS WATER COMPANY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, an. Arizona limited partnership (the "Grantee"), all tight, title, and interest in Sections 23, 24, and 25, Township 1. South, Range 12 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Pima County, Arizona, Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 24, Township 12 South, Range 13 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Pima County, Arizona, and Sections 5, 6, 7,, a, and 18, Township 12 South, Range 14 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Pima County, Arizona, including without limitation the real property described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The Grantor also hereby quit -claims to Grantee, without covenant or warranty, Grantor's right, title, and interest under a all covenants, conditions, restrictions, and negative easements affecting the above -described real property or any portion thereof. If the validity or enforceability of this Quit -Claim Deed is held to be dependent upon the existence of specific legal descrip- tions for portions of the above -described real property,. Grantor, on behalf of itself, its successors and assigns, agrees to execute and deliver to Grantee quit -claim deeds conveying to Grantee such specifically -described real property. DATED this 18th day of Decemb 7935 1897 Pagel of 04/01/2016 10:59 AM r .. STATE OF ARIZONA ) ) Ss County of Maricopa ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this lath day of December, 1986, by George H. Johnson, the President, and Low,P.11 J. Williamson, the Secretary, of FOOTHILLS WATER COMPANY, an Arizona corporation, o:. behalf of the Corporation. c My Commi,sion ExpirZs: Nota ubl' .sw qD omcw, VA Tffmy BELT naowr n18uc-�zo+n W1(*P.1 CONtiV 'fig Cris Ctp1res Apr. 21,1990 010ab11217it 1935 1898 r, Page 2 of 0410112016 10:59 F. ANN RODRIGUEZ, RECORDER RECORDED BY: HRB DEPUTY RECORDER 1562 PE-1 w GOLDER RANCH FIRE DISTRICT 3885 E GOLDER RANCH DR TUCSON AZ 85739 DOCKET: 13662 PAGE: 1319 °F Pr _ NO. OF PAGES: 10 SEQUENCE: 20091970271 '., yx 10/13/2009 RBSCOR 13:59 q�OZlE� MAIL AMOUNT PAID $ 15.00 RESOLUTION 4R-2009-0009 THE GOLDER RANCH FIRE DISTRICT BOARD MET IN PUBLIC SESSION DATED OCTOBER 13, 2009, AND BY UNANIMOUS VOTE APPROVED THE BOUNDARY CHANGE OF THE GOLDER RANCH FIRE DISTRICT TO INCLUDE THE ORO VALLEY ANNEXATION AS ATTACHED IN EXHIBIT A. i i R N KOSLOWSk, .9tERK 1 3 6 6 2 0 1 3 1 9 Page 1 of 10 04/01/2016 9:55 AM /b I. BOUNDARY CHANGE IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE GOLDER RANCH FIRE DISTRICT REFERENCE: Oro Valley Annexation Pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes, 48-262, the undersigned submits the following Boundary Change Impact Statement for the proposed annexation of territory to the Golder Ranch Fire District: 1. The Description of Boundaries: The area proposed to be annexed into the Golder Ranch Fire District (referred to as the "Oro Valley Annexation") consists of: Description of the Oro Valley Annexation is attached as Exhibit "A" hereto, and a detailed accurate map of the Oro Valley Annexation is attached as Exhibit "B° hereto. 2. Estimate of 2009 Assessed Valuation in the Oro Valley Annexation District: Total: $89,006,521.00 / Total Excluding Tax -Exempt Property: $86,421,375.00 3. Estimate of Change in the Tax Rate of the Golder Ranch Fire District: If the annexation is accomplished, it is estimated that there will not be a change in the tax rate of the Golder Ranch Fire District. 4. Estimate of the Change in the Property Tax Liability: A. Typical resident of a portion of the District not in the area proposed to be annexed. If the annexation were to be accomplished, an estimate of the change in the property tax liability of a typical resident of a portion of the district not in the area of the proposed change is as follows (calculation based upon the property located in Township 11 S, Range 13E, Section 36, parcel # 219-53- 3160 with a 2009 secondary assessed value of $27,043.00): 1. Before the proposed change. 1 a. Before the proposed change, the fire district tax collected by 5 Pima County is estimated to be $1.59 (159.00 cents per hundred 2 dollars of secondary assessed value of $27,043.00) or the sum of $429.98. 0 i 3 b. Before the proposed change, the fire district bond tax collected 0 by Pima County is estimated to be $0.17 (0.17 cents per hundred dollars of secondary assessed value of $27,043.00) or the sum of $45.97. Page 2 of 10 04101/2016 9:55 AM Impact Statement Page 2of9 2. After the proposed change a. After the proposed change, the fire district taxis estimated to be $1.59 (159.00 cents per hundred dollars of secondary assessed value) or the sum of $429.98. b. After the proposed change, the fire district bond tax is estimated to be $0.17 (0.17 cents per hundred dollars of secondary assessed value) or the sum of $45.97. B. The typical property owner in Oro Valley Annexation District. If the annexation were to be accomplished, an estimate of the change in the property tax liability of a typical property owner within Oro Valley Annexation District is as follows (calculations based upon the property located in Township 12S, Range 14E, Section 18, parcel # 220-13-0220 with a 2009 secondary assessed value of $30,683): 1. Before the proposed change. a. Before the proposed change, the property owner would not be subject to the Golder Ranch Fire District Tax. b. Before the proposed change, the property owner would not be subject to the Golder Ranch Fire District Bond Tax. 2. After the proposed change. a. After the proposed change, the fire district tax Is estimated to be $1.59 (159.00 cents per hundred dollars of secondary assessed value) or an estimated $487.86. b. After the proposed change, the fire district bond taxis estimated to be $0.17 (0,17 cents per hundred dollars of secondary assessed value) or an estimated $52.16. 5. Benefits to be Derived from the Proposed Annexation: The proposed annexation would provide the following benefits to the residents of 1 the Oro Valley Annexation District and to the remainder of the District: 6 6 A. Benefits to be obtained by the residents of the area proposed to be 2 annexed: 0 1 1. Residents and property owners will receive fire protection and 2 ambulance service from a fire district that has been in service since 1977, which currently consists of six (6) fire stations, seven (7) engines, two (2) ladders, four (4) tenders, four (4) brush trucks, six (6) paramedic ambulances, and support equipmentifacilities. Page 3 of 10 04/01/2016 9:55 AM Impact Statement Page 3 of 9 2. Residents will be afforded the fire insurance rating of the Golder Ranch Fire District, currently a Public Protection Classification (PPC) rating of three (3) that could result in lowered costs for fire insurance premiums. 3. Residents would be allowed to participate in elections of the fire board members and therefore give them a voice in the type and manner of fire protection provided. 4. Residents would be part of a government body entitled to all the provisions afforded residents of a fire district as required by Arizona Revised Statues. B. The benefit to the existing residents of the Golder Ranch Fire District: 1. The tax base of the Golder Ranch Fire District will be increased by approximately $86,421,375.00. 2. Residents will receive direct benefit from the additional tax base. 3. This will result in a broader tax base that will allow for additional revenues to be used to fund fire and emergency medical services. 6. In'uries that will result from the proposed annexation: As a result of the proposed annexation, some of the injuries that will result are as follows: A. There will be an increase in the taxes that the residents and property owners of the area to be annexed will have to pay. The residents and property owners of the newly annexed area will be subject to the fire district taxes assessed by the Golder Ranch Fire District. B. The Golder Ranch Fire District is a governmental entity that could be subjected to potential liability during the performance of its functions, and should this occur, the tax rate of the Golder Ranch Fire District could be increased to pay for any such liabilities incurred by the district. The Golder Ranch Fire District maintains liability insurance in an amount believed adequate and the Board believes that likelihood of a tax increase due to liability of this type to be extremely remote. Dated this 25 day of February_ 2009 l//G/ � f �/ M John Fink, Chief Golder Ranch Fire District 1 3 6 2 0 3 2 2 Page 4 of 10 04/01/2016 9:55 AM Impact Statement Page 4 of 9 Assessed Valuation $86,421,375.00 $86,421,375.00 Annexation Revenue Projections Tax Rate $1.59 $0.17 * Estimated revenue generated from tax levy and/or bond repayment Revenue $1,374,100.00* $146,916.00* 1 3 6 6 2 0 1 3 2 3 Page 5 of 10 04/01 /2016 9:55 AM Impact Statement Page 5 of 9 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION ORO VALLEY ANNEXATION TO THE GOLDER RANCH FIRE DISTRICT PORTIONS OF SECTIONS 12, 13, 14, 23, 24, 25 AND 26, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, AND OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 14 EAST, GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA, SAID PORTIONS ARE DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: IN THE FOLLOWING COURSES, ALL BOOK AND PAGES OF MAPS AND PLATS, ROAD MAPS AND DOCKETS AND PAGES REFERENCED ARE RECORDS OF PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA; BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF THAT PARCEL DESCRIBED IN DOCKET 11777 AT PAGE 4045, SAID CORNER BEING ON THE EXISTING GOLDER RANCH FIRE DISTRICT BOUNDARY ESTABLISHED BY RESOLUTION R-2007-0008 AND DESCRIBED IN DOCKET 13057 AT PAGE 2470; THE FOLLOWING COURSES ARE COINCIDENT WITH THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL AND WITH SAID FIRE DISTRICT BOUNDARY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY TO AN ANGLE POINT; THENCE EASTERLY TO AN ANGLE POINT; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY TO AN ANGLE POINT; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY TO AN ANGLE POINT; THENCE NORTHERLY TO AN ANGLE POINT; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY TO AN ANGLE POINT; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY TO AN ANGLE POINT; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY TO AN ANGLE POINT; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY TO AN ANGLE POINT; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY TO AN ANGLE POINT; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE AND ALONG SAID FIRE DISTRICT BOUNDARY, TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH -SOUTH MID SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 14, AT THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF THAT PARCEL DEDICATED AS THE CANADA DEL ORO WASH AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF VISTA DEL ORO, BOOK 15 OF MAPS AND PLATS PAGE 55; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL AND ALONG SAID FIRE DISTRICT BOUNDARY, TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 13; i THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL AND ALONG SAID FIRE 3 DISTRICT BOUNDARY, TO THE SOUTHERNMOST CORNER OF THAT PARCEL DESCRIBED IN DOCKET 2 4364 AT PAGE 447; 2 THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL AND ALONG SAID FIRE 0 . DISTRICT BOUNDARY, TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF 3 LAMBERT LANE, BOOK 8 OF ROAD MAPS PAGE 57, SAID INTERSECTION BEING ON THE EXISTING 2 GOLDER RANCH FIRE DISTRICT BOUNDARY ESTABLISHED BY RESOLUTION R-2008-0002 AND 4 DESCRIBED IN DOCKET 13260 AT PAGE 2916; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY AND EASTERLY, ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY AND SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF- WAY LINES OF SAID LAMBERT LANE AND ALONG SAID FIRE DISTRICT BOUNDARY TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THAT PARCEL DESCRIBED IN DOCKET 10891 AT PAGE 1076; Page 6 of 10 04101/2016 9:55 AM Impact Statement Page 6 of 9 THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY, DEPARTING SAID FIRE DISTRICT BOUNDARY, ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 5, CANCHA DEL GOLF, BOOK 40 MAPS AND PLATS PAGE 39; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 5 TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 3 IN SAID CANCHA DEL GOLF; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 3 TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ORACLE ROAD (STATE ROUTE 77); THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG A RADIAL LINE FROM SAID NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID ORACLE ROAD AS IT PRESENTLY EXISTS; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, NORTHWESTERLY AND NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 14 EAST; THENCE CONTINUE NORTHEASTERLY, NORTHWESTERLY AND NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID RIGHT- OF-WAY LINE TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 18; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF COMMON AREA'B', STONEY CANYON I, BOOK 40 MAPS AND PLATS PAGE 10; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID COMMON AREA'B" TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID COMMON AREA "B" TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LA RESERVE DRIVE AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF SAID STONEY CANYON I; THENCE CONTINUE EASTERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY PROJECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID COMMON AREA "B" TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID LA RESERVE DRIVE; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 18; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF GOLD CANYON LOTS 1-10, BOOK 46 MAPS AND PLATS PAGE 96; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 25, LA RESERVE, BOOK 41 MAPS AND PLATS PAGE 74; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY, SOUTHWESTERLY AND SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LA RESERVE TO THE SOUTHERNMOST CORNER OF LOT 30 IN SAID LA RESERVE; Y THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 30 TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE 6 EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 18; 6 THENCE SOUTHERLY, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER, TO THE EAST'/. CORNER 2 OF SAID SECTION 18; 0 THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 18, TO 2 THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; 5 THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 18, TO THE SOUTHIA CORNER THEREOF; Page 7 of 10 04101/2016 9:55 AM Impact Statement Page 7 of 9 THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 18, TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE EAST % CORNER OF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 24, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF, SAID CORNER ALSO BEING ON THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF HARDY ROAD AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF SUNNYSLOPE, BOOK 18 MAPS AND PLATS PAGE 34; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 24 AND ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 12 IN SAID SUNNYSLOPE; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY, DEPARTING THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 24, ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 12 AND THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID HARDY ROAD, TO THE NORTHEASTERLY RETURN AT THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 12; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID HARDY ROAD TO THE NORTHWESTERLY RETURN AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 9 IN SAID SUNNYSLOPE, SAID RETURN BEING ON A LINE 75.00 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID HARDY ROAD AND ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH -SOUTH MID SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 25; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID HARDY ROAD AND ALONG A LINE 75.00 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 25 TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF NORTHERN AVENUE; THENCE CONTINUE WESTERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST; THENCE CONTINUE WESTERLY ALONG A LINE 75.00 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF NORTHERN AVENUE, SAID INTERSECTION BEING ON THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA TOWN LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE NO. (0)04-01 AND DESCRIBED IN DOCKET 12225 AT PAGE 2926; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG A LINE 75.00 FEET WEST OF AND PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER AND ALONG SAID TOWN LIMITS TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG A LINE 75.00 FEET WEST OF AND PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER AND ALONG SAID TOWN LIMITS TO THE INTERSECTION WITH A LINE 30.00 FEET NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER, SAID INTERSECTION BEING ON THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA TOWN LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE NO. 93 AND DESCRIBED IN DOCKET 7380 AT PAGE 1018; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE AND ALONG SAID TOWN LIMITS TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF CALLE LOMA LINDA AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF CAMPO BELLO SUBDIVISION, BOOK 7 OF MAPS AND PLATS PAGE 70; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND ALONG SAID TOWN LIMITS TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT 12 IN SAID CAMPO BELLO SUBDIVISION, SAID CORNER BEING ON THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA TOWN LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY RESOLUTION NO. 1974A7 AND DESCRIBED IN DOCKET 4752 AT PAGE 163; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID TOWN LIMITS TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH -SOUTH MIDSECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 23; Page 8 of 10 04101/2016 9;SS AM Impact Statement Page 8 of 9 THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID MID -SECTION LINE AND ALONG SAID -.TOWN LIMITS TO THE INTERIOR '/< CORNER OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE CONTINUE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID MID -SECTION LINE AND ALONG SAID TOWN LIMITS TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY PROJECTION OF THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF CALLE CONCORDIA AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF RANCHO VERDE, BOOK 22 MAPS AND PLATS PAGE 35, SAID INTERSECTION BEING ON THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA TOWN LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE NO.91 AND DESCRIBED IN DOCKET 7380 AT PAGE 1010; THENCE WESTERLY, ALONG SAID EASTERLY PROJECTION AND ALONG SAID TOWN LIMITS TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF CALLE LOMA LINDA; THENCE WESTERLY, SOUTHWESTERLY AND WESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND ALONG SAID TOWN LIMITS TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LA CANADA DRIVE, BOOK 9 OF ROAD MAPS PAGE 64; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND ALONG SAID TOWN LIMITS TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST -WEST MID SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND ALONG SAID TOWN LIMITS TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA TOWN LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE NO. (0)95-72, BOOK 47 MAPS AND PLATS PAGE 57 AND DESCRIBED IN DOCKET 10124 AT PAGE 452; THENCE CONTINUE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND ALONG SAID TOWN LIMITS TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND ALONG SAID TOWN LIMITS TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. _ il74 RICHARD S. H1>A;ELL JR. 0 1 3 2 7 Page 9 of 10 04/01 /2016 9:55 AM A EXHIBU A PORT IQNS OF SFCTICNS 12,13.14.20, ?1 2l) h W. T.12S.. R. 13r--; e.No M.S.,FCTION ia, T. 119., B, 111E, (j,&S R U, PIUA COUNTY, ARIZIONA ®r;:) LAMBE (ANE AIL P NOR 1H i SCALE- 1"-20-0W 0 v I QZPW 70 1 ECIEND EXIESTING 1`30LOPR RAIXF! v �i b T 11777 K No J A FIRE D!STRICT 8CUN0AFY AREA TO BEANNFaW , ROB KEY INFORMATION TABLE rzL 'n 1 DE A US. 20('8402, DKT. 1326G PG. 2916 Ll = DKt- I08g1 PG.1076 G = CANCHA DEL GOLF, BK. 40 MAP. PG 39 D C.A. )3' STGNFY CANYON 1, BK. Q MAP, PG. 10 po -.15 1 r - GOLD CANYON. BOOK 46 W&P. PG 96 LA RESERVE, RK 41 MAP P0. 74 J DKI. lv2tb PIG. j H = D.U. 7380 PG. 1010. I - UKT. 4752 PG. 163 J = MT, 7380 PG. MID K DKI 10124 PG. 452 I 1"'t L L i" A I,Y q 1; aLr TETRA TECH. Nrc lkl':404, JtF.IZCNA 7 1 -Mv) f'.( W WE TWRUAW 2009 'v .4 103. 34 2 (D CD > 0h cot-DWHO tl)0`10)`UF� -- m X Mu —i ED F. ANN RODRIGUEZ, RECORDER DOCKET: 13149 RECORDED BY: MRB PAGE: 8 DEPUTY RECORDER 1562 PE1�c'p of Prhjq NO. OF PAGES: SEQUENCE: 2 20071880003 W 09/27/2007 DOWL ENGINEERS `�� N l �t LEGAL 08:58 ATTN RICHARD CORDOVA rior�r' 166 W ALAMEDA ST MAIL TUCSON AZ 85701 AMOUNT PAID $ 10.00 J ..,4jD0WL E N G I N E E R S'3 A t'ivieion of DOWL LLC LEGAL DESCRIPTION An easement for water utility purposes on a portion of land located in the Northeast Ouarter of Section 24, Township 12 South, Range 13 East, Gila and Salt River Meridian, Pima County, Arizona, as described in docket 6292 page 974 and more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the Northeast corner of said Section 24; THENCE, Southerly along the East Line of said Section 24 South 00°02'46" West a distance of 2107.95 feet to a point, being the Northeast corner of subject property, being North 00002'32" East, 545.03 feet distant form the East quarter corner of said section 24; THENCE, along the Northerly line of subject property North 89"59'35" West a distance of 933.36 feet to a point; THENCE, South 00000'45" East along an existing water utility easement as described in docket 12257 page 1114, a distance of 165.40 feet to a point, being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, also being the Northwest corner of said new water easement; THENCE, North 89°59'15" East a distance of 19.00 feet to a point; THENCE, South 00000'45" East a distance of 15.00 feet to a point; THENCE, South 89"59'15" West a distance of 19.00 feet to a point; THENCE, North 00000'45" West a distance of 15.00 feet to a point, the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; Approximate area for said described easement is approximately 285.0 square feet or 0.010 acres more or less. Prepared on behalf of DOWL Engineers, LLC Prepared for purpose of water utility easement Prepared by Michael F. York, RLS Prepared on June 9, 2006 FILENAME, T40185 Legal Descriptlon for WATER EASEMENT 2.doc Disclaimer: DOWL Engineers accepts no liability for this legal description if it has been modified or reformatted in any way, for any reason from it's original format and content, or used for any other purpose other that the intent in %filch it was prepared for. 166 W. ALAMEDA • TUCSON, ARIZONA B 5701 • 5201882-8698 • FAX 520/824.0384 1 3 1 9 0 0 0 0 8 Page 1 of 2 0410112016 9:47 AM COMMENCE AT NE COR S24-12S-13E r-3 1 N T cp in N � O N r� U 00 •w T ( ' � N � (n Z I— N 89'59' 35" W 933.36' w w 'to I' NE COR o SUBJECT PROPERTY 0� T. P.O.B. 'L15'WATER EASEMENT QKT12257 PG 1114 CDC] BAPTIST CHURCH II II O�L N V EXHIBIT FOR WATER EASEMENT DOWN CD[i BAPTIST CHURCH 'AA P[]RTIDN OF SECTI[1N Pag ■ N o IN Y t NI • 24, T12S, R13E, G&SRM 04/01/20 PIMA COUNTY,ARIZONA 3 1 9 0 4 9 2 of 2 9:47 AM I F. ANN RODRIGUEZ, RECORDER DOCKET: 13149 5 RECORDED BY: MRB DEPUTY RECORDER oilP1 t�/ �O PAGE: No. OF PAGES: 3 �d SEQUENCE: 20071880002 1562 PE1 W x y `�'"� 09/27/2007 08:56 DOWL ENGINEERS lRIZo�A LEGAL ATTN RICHARD CORDO`rA MAIL 166 W ALAVEDA ST AM uNT PAID $ 10.00 TUCSON AZ 85701 t' oowL E N G I N E E R SO A Division of DOWL LLC LEGAL DESCRIPTION An easement for water utility purposes on a portion of land located in the Northeast Quarter of Section 24, Township 12 South, Range 13 East, Gila and Salt River Meridian, Pima County, Arizona, as described in docket 6292 page 974 and more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the Northeast comer of said Section 24; THENCE, Southerly along the East Line of said Section 24 South 00'02'46" West a distance of 2107.95 feet to a point, being the Northeast comer of subject property, being North 00°02'32" East, 545.03 feet distant form the East quarter corner of said section 24; THENCE, along the Northerly line of subject property North 89'59'35" West a distance of 948.36 feet to a point; THENCE South 00000'45" East a distance of 133.87 feet to a point, the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, said point being the Northeast corner of said water easement; THENCE, South 00°00'45" East along an existing water utility easement as described in docket 12257 page 1114, a distance of 15.00 feet to a point; THENCE, South 89°59'15" West a distance of 21.38 feet to a point; THENCE, North 73"19'24" West a distance of 136.54 feet to a point; THENCE, North 57`12'31" West a distance of 5.58 feet to a point; i THENCE, South 32647'29" West a distance of 8.63 feet to a point; 4 THENCE, North 57°12'31" West a distance of 15.00 feet to a point; 9 0 THENCE, North 32°47'29" East a distance of 8.63 feet to a point; 0 THENCE, North 57°12'31" West a distance of 19.33 feet to a point; 5 THENCE, South 55°3T29" West a distance of 91.07 feet to a point; THENCE, North 34022'31" West a distance of 15.00 feet to a point; THENCE, North 55°37'29" East a distance of 101.03 feet to a point; THENCE, South 57012'31" East a distance of 47.75 feet to a point; THENCE, South 73°19'24" East a distance of 132.22 feet to a point; THENCE, North 89°59'15" East a distance of 19.18 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Approximate area of said described easement is approximately 4,547.6 square feet or 0.104 acres more or less. 168 W. ALAMEDA • TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701 • 5RO/BB2.3696 • PAX 520/624-03B4 Page 1 of 3 04/01 /2016 9:46 AM AdDWL E N G I N E E R SO A Division of DOVVL LLC Prepared on behalf of DOWL Engineers Prepared for Oro Valley Water Utility Prepared for purpose of water utility easement Prepared by Michael F. York, RLS Prepared on October 30, 2006 FILE NAME: T40185 Legal Description for WATER EASEMENT 1 REV(20061030).doc Disclaimer. DOWL Engineers accepts no liability for this legal description if it has been modified or refunnalted in any way, for any reason from it's original format and content, or used for any other purpose other that the intent in which it was prepared for. 1 3 1 4 9 0 0 0 0 6 Page 2 of 3 04/01/2016 9:46 AM 168 W. ALAMEDA - TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701 • B20/682-8696 • FAX 520/624-0384 COMMENCE AT — NE COR S24-12S-13E IVL Ii VI\ SUBJECT PROPERTY 15'WATER EASEMENT DKT12257 PG 1114 CDO BAPTIST CHURCH N Ulw u!UK b �:.ii7..�.>{ :L'�r3 F-ki:. I- „ 1-0 EXHIBIT FOR WATER EASEMENT DO� � CDO BAPTIST CHURCH A PORTION OF SECTION ENO IN a OA• 24, T12S, R13E, G&SRM P/og PIMA COUNTY,ARIZONA 1 3 i 0 0 0 7 3 of 3 9:46 AM r F. ANN RODRIGUEZ, RECORDER RECORDED BY: PH DEPUTY RECORDER 3056 PE2 W COTTONWOOD PROPERTIES 3567 E SUNRISE DR STE 201 TUCSON AZ 85713 of PI,r DOCKET: PAGE: NO. OF PAGES: 12696 2483 6 SEQUENCE: 20052370963 12/08/2005 tltllOK� AG 14:32 MAIL AMOUNT PAID $ 21.00 PRIVATE SEWER JOINT USE AGREEMENT Whereas Pasch Ridge Christian Academy, Inc. hereinafter referred to -as "School," is Owner of that real property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, and Whereas Canyon Del Oro Baptist Church, hereinafter referred to as "Church," is Owner of that real property described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto, and Whereas both School and Church benefit from an existing private sewer which crosses Church property and which is identified by an easement in the Gift Deed recorded in the Pima County Recorder's Office at Docket 6292 at Page 974; Therefore School and Church hereby agree as follows: 1. The easement for the existing private sewer which crosses Church property is reaffirmed. 2. The costs for maintenance, repair and replacement of private sewer improvements which do not affect the main line are to be paid entirely by the party requesting the improvements. 3. The costs for maintenance, repair and replacement of the sewer main which crosses Church property will be paid for by the party responsible for required maintenance or repair or replacement. In the event that neither party is responsible, then the costs will be shared on a pro-rata basis as follows: a. School property is about 48 acres, therefore School will pay 3/4 of the costs. b. Church property is about 16 aces, therefore Church will pay 1/4 of the costs. 4. Each party will pay its full share at the time such maintenance, repair or replacement is required. The shared costs shall include all costs necessary to restore Church property in a workmanlike manner to the condition prior to the work 5. In the event of a dispute, the parties will accept the findings of Binding Arbitration by a mutually accepted arbitrator. 6. School and Church hold Pima County harmless for all costs associated with this private sewer. 7. This agreement will run with the land and will be binding on all successes, assigns, or heirs who will hereafter own the respective properties. This agreement entered into this (p th day of2005. Pasch Ridge Christian cede y, Ioc. Canyon Del Oro Baptist Church n /.j�j� l t/ V {l '-�! . ✓ 6 David Mehl eve Van Kley 0 Chairman Senior Pastor 4 State of Arizona ) County of Pima )SS This instrument was acknowledged before me this If*+ day of ccrnlxh 2005. My Commission Expires AA,IL aao-T Notary. ANGELA M. ROMERO Notary Public . Arizona PIrno County My Comm. Expires Jan 16. 2007 Randy Speirs NftryPubilC Stain of Adz= Elder Board Charrman "eai ' Dons A Siena My 0z vusw Fires State of Arizona ) D6n3rZoo9 County of Pima )SS This instrument was acknowledged before me this w"iX day of ce 2005. My Commission Expire 3 i 'age 1 of 6 ./01 /2016 9:42 AM .1, PRIVATE SEWER JOINT USE AGREEMENT Whereas Pusch Ridge Christian Academy, Inc. hereinafter referred to -as "School," is Owner of that real property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, and Whereas Canyon Del Oro Baptist Church, hereinafter referred to as "Church," is Owner of that real property described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto, and Whereas both School and Church benefit from an existing private sewer which crosses Church property and which is identified by an easement in the Gift Deed recorded in the Pima County Recorder's Office at Docket 6292 at Page 974; Therefore School and Church hereby agree as follows: I. The easement for the existing private sewer which crosses Church property is reaffirmed. 2. The costs for maintenance, repair and replacement of private sewer improvements which do not affect the main line are to be paid entirely by the party requesting the improvements. 3. The costs for maintenance, repair and replacement of the sewer main which crosses Church property will be paid for by the party responsible for required maintenance or repair or replacement. In the event that neither party is responsible, then the costs will be shared on a pro -rats basis as follows: a. School property is about 48 acres, therefore School will pay 3/4 of the costs. b. Church property is about 16 acres, therefore Church will pay 1/4 of the costs. 4. Each party will pay its full share at the time such maintenance, repair or replacement is required. The shared costs shall include all costs necessary to restore Church property in a workmanlike manner to the condition prior to the work. 5. In the event of a dispute, the parties will accept the findings of Binding Arbitration by a mutually accepted arbitrator. 6. School and Church hold Pima County harmless for all costs associated with this private sewer. 7. This agreement will run with the land and will be binding on all successors, assigns, or heirs who will hereafter own the respective properties. This agreement entered into this day of 2005. Pusch Ridge Christian Academy, Inc. Canyon Del Oro Baptist Church David Mehl Chairman State of Arizona ) County of Pima )SS This instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2005. My Commission Expires Notary, Steve Van Kley Senior PasIpt rY. Rand y Speirs Elder Board Chariman State of Arizona ) County of Pima )SS This i ent was ackno ledged before me this —J, X day of &�,_ 2005. My CommisLexplli res l Notary G .. ���---- 1 2 6 9 6 0 4 8 4 Page 2 of 6 04/0112016 9:42 AM Exhibit A ALL THOSE PORTIONS OF LOT 52 OF LINDA VISTA CITRUS TRACT NO.2 A SUBDIVISION OF PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE PIMA COUNTY. RECORDER IN BOOK 6 OF !~RAPS AND PLATS AT PAGE 79 THEREOF; AND LOTS 1 AND 2 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERMAN, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA, LYING EASTERLY OF THE RELOCATED TUCSON FLOMMCE HIGHWAY, FEDERAL. SECONDARY PROJECT M., EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET OF SAID LOT 1; EXCEPT ANY PORTION LYING WITHIN CALLE CONCORDIA; FURTHER EXCEPTING PARCELS 1 AND 2 CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF ARIZONA. SY AND THROUGH ITS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, RECORDED IN DOCKET 6004 AT PAGE 275, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL 1: THOSE PORTIONS OF LOT 52, L.INDA VISTA CITRUS TRACTS NO.7, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 6 OF MAPS, PAGE 79, RECORDS OF PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA, AND OF LOT 2 OF SECTION 24. TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH. RANGE 13 EAST, GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA, WENCH LIR EASTERLY OF THE EXISTING EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF U.S. HIGHWAY 89 (TUCSO"RACLE JCT.-GLOBE HIGHWAY) AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 53 MINUTES 10 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LNE THEREOF, A DISTANCE OF 153.03 FEET TO THE EXISTING CENTERLINI: OF US HIGHWAY 89 (TUCSON-ORACLE JCT.-GLOBE HIGHWAY); THENCE NORTH 19 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 50 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EXISTING CENTERLINE, A DISTANCE OF 3021.21 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 10 SECONDS EAST,100.0 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING ON THE EXISTING EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID US HIGHWAY 89; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 70 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 10 SECONDS EAST, 20.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 19 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 50 SECONDS EAV,10O.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH TO DEGREES 14 MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST, 20.00 FEET TO SAID EXISTING EASTERLY 0 2 RIGHT OF WAY LINE; 4 8 THENCE SOUTH 19 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 50 SECONDS WEST, ALONG SAID EXISTING EASTERLY RIGHT OF 5 WAY LINE. A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 2: Page 3 of 6 04/01/2016 9:42 AM THAT PORTION OF LOT 1 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE,13 EAST. GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, PIMA COUNTY. ARIZONA, LYING EASTERLY OF THE EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY OF US HIGHWAY 89 (TUCSO N-ORACLE JCT.-GLOBE HIGHWAY) DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE SOUTH 90 OEGREES 53 MINUTES 30 SECONDS WEST ALONG TH9 NORTH LINE THEREOF, A DISTANCE OF WZ69 FEET TO THE EXISTING CENTERLINE OF SAID US HIGHWAY 89; THENCE FROM A LOCAL TANGENT BEARING OF SOUTH 5 DEGREES 42 MINUTES 15 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID EXISTING CENTERLINE, ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF S729.58 FEET, A DISTANCE OF 1129.51 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 73 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 03 SECONDS EAST,100.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING ON THE EXISTING EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID US HIGHWAY 89; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 73 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 03 SECONDS EAST, 60.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 17 DEGREES 17 MINUTES 57 SECONDS WEST, 61.68 FEET; THENCE NORTH 72 DEGREES 24 MINUTES 03 SECONDS WEST, 60.00 FEET TO SAID EXt$TMIG EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE; THENCE FROM A LOCAL TANGENT BEARING OF NORTH 17 DEGREES 35 MINUTES 57 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EXISTING EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 5829.58 FEET, A DISTANCE OF 81.05 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF SEGMNMIG. AND FURTHER EXCEPT ALL THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO CANYON DEL ORO BAPTW CHURCH, INCH AN ARIZONA NON PROFIT CORPORATION, IRgCORDED IN DOCKET 6292 AT PAGE 974, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: ALL THAT PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND IN SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA AS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN DEED FILED IN BOOK 1356 OF DOCKET AT PAGE 491 IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER (GLO BRASS CAP) OF SECTION 24; THENCE TURN SOUTH 0 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 03 SECONDS WEST. ALONG THE EAST LINE THEREOF. A DISTANCE 'OF 119.351119.53 RECORD) TO A GLO BRASS CAP; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 03 MINUTES 08 SECONDS WEST, ALONG SAID FAST LINE A DISTANCE OF 1,988.83 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGMI NG, SAID POINT BEING DISTANT NORTH 0 DEGREES 03 MINUTES 08 SECONDS EAST, 643.00 FEET FROM THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 24; � 6 9 THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 33 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1.258.16 FEET; } ' 0 THENCE SOUTH 19 DEGREES 44 MINUTES 38 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 230.53 FEET; 2 4 THENCE NORTH 70'DEGREES 19 MINUTES 22 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 49.0E FEET; 5 THENCE SOUTH 19 DEGREES 44 MINUTES 38 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 4.00 FEET. - THENCE SOUTH 70 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 22 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 49.00 FEET; Page; 4 of 6 04/01 /2016 9:42 AM THENCE SOUTH 19 DEGREES 44 MINUTES 38 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 29u8 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 35 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1,078.96 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 26 SECONDS WEST. A DISTANCE ON 4&00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 59 iIAINUTES 39 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 35826 FEET TO UW EAST QUARTER CORNER; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 03 MINUTES 08 SECONDS EAST, ALONG SAID EAST CAVE A DISTANCE OF 545.00 FEET TO THE TRUE FOWT OF BEGINNING. 9 6 0 2 4 8 7 Page 5 of 6 04101/2016 9:42 AM EXHIBIT "B" All that portion of that certain parcel of land in Section 24, Township 12 South, Range 13 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Pima County, Arizona, as described in that certain Deed filed in Boole 1356 of Dockets at Page 491 in the office of the Recorder of Pima County, Arizona, and more particularly described as follows: Commence at the Northeast Corner (G.L.O. Brass Cap) of Section 24; Thence turn South 0 degrees 04 minutes 03 seconds West along the East line thereof a distance of 119.35 feet (119.53 feet record) to a G.L.O. Brass Cap; Thence South 0 degrees 03 minutes 08 seconds West along said East line, a distance of 1988.63 feet to the point of beginning, said point being distant North 0 degrees 03 minutes 08 seconds East 545.00 feet from the East Quarter Corner of said Section 24; Thence North 89 degrees 59 minutes 35 seconds West, a distance of 1258.16 feet; Thence South 19 degrees 44 minutes 38 seconds West, a distance o€230.53 feet; Thence North 70 degrees 15 minutes 22 seconds West, a distance of 49.00 feet; Thence South 19 degrees 44 minutes 38 seconds West, a distance of 4.00 feet; Thence South 70 degrees 15 minutes 22 seconds East a distance of 49.00 feet; Thence South 19 degrees 44 minutes 38 seconds West, a distance of 296.68 feet; Thence South 89 degrees 59 minutes 35 seconds East, a distance of 1078.86 feet; Thence South 0 degrees 00 minutes 25 seconds West, a distance of 45.00 feet; Thence South 89 degrees 59 minutes 35 seconds East, a distance of 358.26 feet to said East Quarter Corner, Thence North 0 degrees 03 minutes 08 seconds East along said East line, a distance of 545.01 feet to the point of beginning. Page 6 of 6 04101/2016 9:42 AM F. ANN RODRIGUEZ, RECORDER RECORDED BY: RJL DEPUTY RECORDER 9544 PE2 W SPRINT SPECTRUM L P 6391 SPRINT PKWY OVERLAND PARK KS 66251 After recording please return to: Sprint Spectrum L.P. Sprint Contracts and Performance MIS: KSOPHT0101-Z2650 6391 Sprint Parkway Overland Park, KS 66251-2650 STATE OF ARIZONA COUNTY OF PIMA DOCKET: 12441 you Put �0 PAGE: 3974 NO. OF PAGES: 10 w ;G "A, SEQUENCE: 20042331017 12/03/2004 \ goL-- MEMO 17 : 3 0 MAIL AMOUNT PAID S 15.00 MEMORANDUM OF ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT This Memorandum of Assignment and Assumption Agreement (the "Assignment Memorandum") is made and entered into on the 10th day of September, 2004, by and between QWEST WIRELESS, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company with an office located at 1801 California Street, 52"d Floor, Denver, Colorado 80202 (the "Assignor"), and SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P., a Delaware limited liability company with an office located at 6391 Sprint Parkway, Overland Park, KS 66251-2650. WITNESSETH WHEREAS, Assignee has acquired telecommunications towers and certain related assets of Assignor in several states in which Assignor does business, pursuant to a transaction involving an Assignment and Assumption Agreement (the "Assignment and Assumption Agreement") of even date herewith. WHEREAS, pursuant to the Assignment and Assumption Agreement, Assignor assigned and Assignee accepted and acquired that certain site lease, license, easement or similar agreement more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Source Document') affecting the property and/or the premises more particularly described on Exhibit A-1 attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"), an interest in a portion of which was conveyed to Assignor pursuant to the Source Document (the "Premises"); 1 2 4 4 i 0 9 7 4 Page 1 u TUC016 04/01/2016 8:YIN Landlord 1 WHEREAS, the Source Document, if recorded, is more particularly described on Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; WHEREAS, by virtue of the Assignment and Assumption Agreement, Assignee has succeeded to all the rights and obligations (accruing from and after the date hereof) of the Assignor under the Source Document and the terms, covenants and provisions of the Source Document extend to and are binding upon the respective successors and assigns of Assignor and Assignee; WHEREAS, to the extent a consent or other approval of the lessor, landlord, licensor or grantor under the Source Document was required by the Source Document, Assignor has obtained such consent or approval; and WHEREAS, Assignor as lessor, landlord or licensor has leased or licensed tower space on the telecommunications tower located on the Premises and/or ground space next to said tower to the lessee(s), tenant(s) or licensee(s) described in that (those) certain lease or license agreement(s) more particularly described on Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Tower Lease(s)"); NOW THEREFORE, Assignor and Assignee, in consideration of the premises, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, do hereby acknowledge as follows: 1. Pursuant to the Assignment and Assumption Agreement, Assignor unconditionally granted, sold, conveyed, assigned, transferred, set over and delivered the Source Document and the Tower Lease(s) unto Assignee, to have and to hold forever, subject to the terms of the Source Document. 2. Assignee accepted such assignment and agreed to assume all of the obligations of Assignor accruing from and after the date hereof for performance of all of the terms, conditions and covenants of Assignor as lessee, tenant, easement holder, or otherwise under the Source Document, including the obligation to pay rent, and all of the obligations of Assignor accruing from and after the date hereof for performance of all of the terms, conditions and covenants of Assignor as lessor, landlord or licensor under the Tower Lease(s). 3. Assignor hereby acknowledges that the telecommunications tower structure and related facilities and equipment located on the Premises demised under the Source Document (except for the Excluded Assets, which includes Assignor's Equipment) has been granted, sold, conveyed, assigned, transferred, set over and delivered to Assignee under the Assignment and Assumption Agreement. 2 4 4 4. This Assignment Memorandum is intended to give record notice of the 1 Assignment and Assumption Agreement and of the rights created thereby, all of which are 0 hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects by the parties hereto. 9 7 5. Copies of the Assignment and Assumption Agreement and the Source Document 5 are on file in the offices of Assignor and Assignee. Page 2 of 10 TUC016 04/01/2016 8:49 AM Landlord 1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Memorandum of Assignment as of the day and year first written above. [remainder of page intentionally left blank; signature pages for both Assignor and Assignee follow] 1 2 4 4 1 0 3 9 7 6 Page 3 of 10 Tuc016 04/01/2016 8:49 AM Landlord 1 ASSIGNOR: QWEST rl,E� LLC,a Delaware limitedliability cy j'/-0 By: / Witness Na Ken Fr sley Title: Director, Wireless N/ork ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF ARIZONA ) COUNTY OF MARICOPA ) On the 9 day of September in the year 2004, before me, the undersigned, personally appeared Ken Frensley, personally known to me and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his capacity, that by his signature on the instrument, the individual, or the person upon behalf of which the individual acted, executed the instruzp6j, and that ch individual made such appearance before the undersigned. OCTAVIO LAMAS Notary Public — Arizona Mancopa County Expires ON31/08 Notary Public My commission expires: (Notarial Stamp/Seal) 1 2 4 4 1 0 3 9 7 7 PagL- 4 of 10 I TUC016 04/01/2016 8:49 AM Landlord 1 ASSIGNEE: SPRINT SPEC M L.P., a Delaware limited partnership By: I otin Name: Jim Amato Title: Site Delivery Manager ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA On the 24- day of 0 ddrin the year 2004, before me, the undersigned, personally appeared Jim Amato personally known to me and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his capacity, that by his signature on the instrument, the individual, or the person upon behalf of which the individual ted, executed the instrument, and that such individual made such appearance before the undersi ed. Not Public LISA D. KERSEY My commission expires: z Commission # 1303787 NOlory Public . Colilofiio (Notari cal) Alomedo County My COMM. Expires Moy 7.2005 V 1 2 4 4 i a 3 9 7 8 Page 5 of 10 TUC016 04/01/2016 6:49 AM Landlord 1 MEMORANDUM OF ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION Exhibit A Source Document Option and Site Lease Agreement for the Site located at 9200 N. Oracle Road, Tucson, AZ 1 2 4 4 i 0 3 9 7 9 Page 6 of 10 TUC016 04101 /2016 8:49 AM Landlord 1 MEMORANDUM OF ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION Exhibit A-1 Legal Description of Premises As set forth in Attachment "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Also known as: 9200 N. Oracle Road, Tucson, AZ 1 2 4 4 1 0 3 9 8 0 Page 7 of 10 TUC016 04/01/2016 8:49 AM TUC016 Exhibit A-1 Attachment A Site located on the property known as: - Legal Description: All that portion of that certain parcel of land in Section 24, Township iZ South. Range 13• East,_ Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Pima County, Arizona, as described in that certain Deed filed in Book 1356 of Dockets at Page 49i in the office of the Recorder of Pima County, Arizona, and more particularly described as follows: COMMENCE at the Northeast corner (& G.L.O. Brass Cap) of Section 24; . THENCE turn South 0 degrees 04 minutes'03 seconds West, along the East line thereof a distance of 119.35 feet (119.S3 feet record) to a O.L.O. Brass Cap; THENCE turn South 03 degrees 03 minute 08 seconds West, along said East line. a• distance.of.1,See. 63 feat to •the _.POINT.OF. BEGINNING, I said point being distant North o degrees 03 minutes 08 seconds East, 54S.00 feet from the East quarter corner of said Section 24; i THENCE North 89 degrees 59 minutes 35 seconds West, a distance of 1,258.19 feet; ' THENCE South 19 degrees 44 minutes 38 seconds West, a distance of 230.53 feet; THENCE North 70 degrees 15 minutes 22 seconds West,,a distance, of 49.00 feet; THENCE South I9 degrees 44 minutes 38 seconds west, a distance of 4.00 feet; THENCE South 70 degrees 15 minutes 22 seconds East, a distance of 49.00 feet; THENCE South 19 degrees 44 minutes 38 seconds West, a distance of 296.68 feet; THENCE South 89 degrees S9 minutes 35 seconds East, a distance of 1,078.86 feet; THENCE South 0 degrees 00 minutes 25 seconds West, a distance of 45.00 feet; THENCE South 89 degrees 53 minutes 35 seconds East, a distance of 358.26 feet to said East quarter corner; - 1 THENCE North 0 degrees 03 minutes 08 seconds East, along said East 2 4 line a distance of 545.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. 4 1 Property ID: Parcel # 225-10-064C 3 9 Also known as: 9200 North Oracle Road, Tucson, Arizona 8 1 Page 8 of 10 04/01/2016 8:49 AM Landlord 1 MEMORANDUM OF ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION Exhibit B Recording Information For Source Document N/A 1 2 4 4 1 0 3 9 8 2 Page 9 of 10 TUC016 04/01/2016 8:49 AM Landlord I 10 MEMORANDUM OF ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION Exhibit C Tower Lease(s) Lease Supplement Expedited Process - Site TUC016 / PH63XC507 pursuant to Reciprocal Joint Use Agreement 1 2 4 4 1 0 3 9 8 3 Page 10 of 11 TUC016 04/01/2016 8:49 AM V. ANN RODRIGOEZ, RECORDER RECORDED BY: JAS DEPUTY RECORDER 8542 PSI. w )3lZIICE CALL 2055 N KOLB RD III TUCSON AZ 85715 DOCUNVIENT TITLE: DOCKET: 12257 � PAGE; 1134 NO. OF PAGES: 4 SEQUENCE. 20040490339 03/12/2004 EASMNT 14:39 MAIL AMOUNT PAID $ 10.00 i 2 1 Page 1 of 4 04/01/2016 8:46 AM v w ,r WATER UTILITY EASEMENT l 01 av. 0 /l rjed(%t a �� , ("Grantor"), does hereby grant to THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEi�c ("Grantee"), aperpetual right-of-way for ingress, egress and a perpetual water utility easement and right-of-wayforthe construction, maintenance and operation of a water pipeline and appurtenances in, over, under, and across the following described premises, situated in Pima County, Arizona; shown on the attached Exhibit'A" and made a part hereof by reference. Grantee may enter upon the Property and may dig ditches and install water utility lines and may enter the Property at all reasonable times for the purpose of construction, maintenance, repair, service, replacement and removing any water utility lines and appurtenances. Following any use of the Property for the above purposes, Grantee will restore the Property to a good and clean condition, and if the property is paved, to restore the pavement to a similar condition as found before the pavement is cut. This easement is subject to the following conditions: (1) It is understood and agreed that the Grantor may use the said right-of-way and easement for any purposes not inconsistent with actual use of said right ofway and easement for the purposes herein granted, so long as Grantee's use and access to this right-of-way and easement is not obstructed; (2) That all grants, covenants and provisions herein shall be binding on and inure -- — -- —---,—`-` - to the lbenefits of the -heirs, successors, and assigns of the parties hereto', (3) That Grantee shall hold Grantor free and harmless of any and all claims, liabilities or damages associated with Grantor's use and enjoyment of the i easement and right-of-way, including but not limited to the costs of repairing 2 or maintaining any water main locatedwithinsaid easement and right-of-way; 5 THIS EASEMENT granted this day of` , 20±114L. i GRANTOR 1 1 STATE OF ARIZONA ) )SS COUNTY OF PIMA ) Thisinstrumentw knowled edbeforemethis dayof Ulitii 20 04 , by a My Commission Expires: f OFFICIAL SEAL (WEa i aICIA B. MEAD NO ARY PLISUC-ARIZONA PI'10A [-.OUIVTY MyCorn^i ��: Cud 1.2005 Page 2 of 4 04101/2016 8:46 AM ~ f UNDA VISTA BLVD. 30.00 NE GORt:R 5EG 24 T125,R13E 7G5.32' 000E6 04'01" 8q 35 r r I �I L I 251Q2 n BRUCE R' r + PUSGH RIDGE o, CALL GHR15TIAN ACADEMY DRad ' _ �R7�dNA U- - q , a uj NOiZTH y 730EG 00'03'E $ (1000, O W E R-5,82q-58 5 170E5 17'57'W I' t_- 66 4q GI.68' N 72DE5 24'03'W 60 00' I gGA1..e 0 100 200 300 404 a � I I + I I � P. +CJ - �+ I I r & TRUE P08-\ lb 6gCeG 5g'34'E 1256 ZG' fn .7 q4O bb' r � 9 19016 4 00' r oQ cl � OODEG 00'00'W 5 500 00' 5 70PEG 15'22'E 4g00' N IaDEG 45'50'E CANYON DEL. ORO q 100.0' DAFTIST GHURCH 5 700EG 1410'C N IgDEG 44'3$'E 20 0' 29G 66' -- N OC EG 00'00'E 6 N IgDEG 44'36'E 45.00 Ifq 20' N i5goE6 5q'331UvCAI-LE CONCORDIA � _ 940.34' `� 66 q5' - E 1/4 GOP. 5EG 24 page 3 of 4 WATER UNE EASEMENT T 17 5, R i3 E 04101/2016 8AG AM WATER LINE EASEMENT Canyon Del Oro Baptist Church December 16, 2003 A 15.00 foot wide easement being 7.50 feet on each side of the following described centerline: COMMENCING at the Northeast comer of Section 24, Township 12 South, Range 13 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Pima County, Arizona; THENCE South 00 degrees 03' 18" West along the East line of said Section 24, a distance of 2107.98 feet; - - - - - — - — THENCE North 89 degrees 59' 34" West a distance of 940.86 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE South 00 degrees 00' 00" West for a distance of 500.00 feet to a point on the South property line of Canyon Del Oro Baptist Church, said point being North 00 degrees 00'00"E a distance of 45.00 feet to the mid -section line; and North 89 degrees 59' 34" West along the mid- section line of said Section 24, a distance of 940.34 feet; and South 00 degrees 03' 18" West along the East line of said Section 24, a distance of 2,652.98 feet from the Northeast Corner of said Section 24. Page 1 of 1 Page 4 of 4 04/01/2016 8:46 AM TAX SEARCH REPORT Printed: Friday, 1 April 2016 08:44 AM Order: 22643161 Area Code: 1012 Tax Rate: 15.9 Parcel Number: 225-10-064C1 Docket Book: 6292 Recorded: 06/03/1980 Situs Address: 9200 N ORACLE RD Page: 974 Owners Name: CANYON DEL ORO BAPTIST CHURCH INC Address: 9200 N ORACLE RD Section: 24 Book: 0 TUCSON AZ Township: 12S Page: 0 85704 Range:13E Block: Lot: Legal: IRR PCL BEING PT OF S545' OF LOT 2 15.84 AC SEC 24-12-13 (FORMERLY 203-36-064C) 2015 TAXES UPDATED THRU 03/15/2016 Value Ratio Land: $482,962.00 18.5% Improvement: $1,143,443.00 18.5% Full Cash Value Exemption Net Assessed Land & Impr: $1,626,405.00 TOTAL $300,885.00 Personal Prop: $0.00 TOTAL $0.00 Limited: $1,626,405.00 TOTAL 2015 TOTAL TAX = $0.00 FIRST HALF INTEREST SECOND HALF INTEREST TOTAL DUE $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 NO LIABILITY BACK TAX INFORMATION UPDATED THRU 03/15/2016 ** NO DELINQUENT TAXES FOR THIS PARCEL ** UPDATED THRU DATES: ASSESSMENTS RESOLUTIONS CITY OF TUCSON: 03/15/2016 03/15/2016 ORO VALLEY: 03/15/2016 03/15/2016 PIMA COUNTY: 03/15/2016 03/15/2016 ** NO ASSESSMENTS ** ** NO RESOLUTIONS ** ** NO SOLD ASSESSMENTS ** Page 1 of 1 ASSESSOR'S RECORD MAP SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH RANGE 13 EAST 225-10 WEST 536.92' (G.L.O.) -11 LINDA VISTA BLVD. -12 I O LOT I GULDER RANCH F.D. T GV N OF URO VALLEY UNORGANIZED NOW 43.26 AC FORMERLY VISTA MONTgNA �F 203-36 LINDA 0 56/31 M&P v 2G z a I -37 W 0 0 132.40' 2E T3za�0�s4 0 VISTA CIT US e w 6 79 M&P I I TRACTS �NOVISTA LOT 2 I I TOWN- 43.29 AC. ao II I HOUSES o II I LOTS 1-63 Z (225- 11) I I 26 48 M& NO. 2 22- I TTJn-M4 (n I I I DSA y I I I q$ s aan4 zs n g I I I ^ N SEE 64 n CALLE v I — - DETA/L �' 0 _ I CONCORDIA / 5' o p— — — — — — — — — — ----- -- — J J v z I 250' 43 3T 3 3 AC. I 3 ROLLING IQ �� 1 N HILLS P CE ROLLING HILLS STREET I VISTA SHADOWg4 EL ORO SHADOW Ln r MEADOWBROOK� MOUNTAIN q�� TWN. �w DIVAco 0 Z U PLACE �rtv MEADQWDROOK DRIVE 58 M&P �z " Li .......° .. ESTATES......... (. 25-11) /� 3 SPRING 2 ..... F MOUNTAIN SAN' LOT 4 13/75 M&PtoRi,,Z43.36 A a OR�CLE �,A zU °Rrye ESTATESwQT pZ 4 SQUTAR SHADOW ti ;o h� �a� o BLKA EDEN ___EAST W N ASSESSED WITH 300' O 225-11-068A PLACE (225-11) ti M&P� / a 6A 12s; (225-11) j 14/93 M&P (225-12) o GGLDER RANCH F.D. ` GOLDER RANCH F.D. -<DK m >K >< >< ><>G><><><><><9<><><><><X><><XY MGUNTAIN VISTA F1). Y HARDY ROAD `I `401 p J 3� WEST 5391.54' (G.L.O.) � r 0 v 4g. DETAIL 1 1'=150' LJ 0 11 J a z 0 H Q z 0 G7 a z 0 o' 0 U 3 Z ZQ �cv so, O �J 2 �O J DETAIL 2 h 1'=150' coun ty assessor^ 2008-7 \T12S\R13E\S24- 05/28/10 .YG6 scvx 6, Y.458 099, 9L.y. 0 300 600 900 12CO FEET Page 1 of 1 Real Property Tax Inquiry STATE TAX TOTAL I AS OF TRC CODE: 22510064c YEAR: 2015 TAX: DATE: 104/01/16 NO: CURRENT STATUS AND SUMMARY FIRST INSTALLMENT SECOND INSTALLMENT TOTALS TAX DUE: INTEREST DUE: TAX PAID: PAID DATE: REMAINING AMOUNT: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 TOTAL DUE: $0.00 HISTORY TAX YEAR TAX AMOUNT 2014 2013 2012 2011 PROPERTY INFORMATION PROPERTY TYPE: Real Property TAX AREA: 1012 TAXPAYER NAME/ADDRESS CANYON DEL ORO BAPTIST CHURCH INC 9200 N ORACLE RD TUCSON AZ 85704 PROPERTY ADDRESS 9200 N ORACLE RD LEGAL DESCRIPTION IRR PCL BEING PT OF S545' OF LOT 2 15.84 AC SEC 24-12-13 (FORMERLY 203-36-064C) PAID BY NO DATA AVAILABLE ON BEHALF OF NO DATA AVAILABLE If you have any questions, please call our office at (520) 724-8341. http://www.to. pima.gov/pcto/tweb/property_inquiry/show/22510064c/2015 4/1 /2016 Office of The Pima County Assessor Page 1 of 1 Book -Map -Parcel: 225-10-064C Oblique Image Tax Year: Tax Area: 1012 Property Address: Street No Street Direction Street Name Location 9200 N ORACLE RD Oro Valley Taxpayer Information: Property Description: CANYON DEL ORO BAPTIST CHURCH INC IRR PCL BEING PT OF S545' OF LOT 2 15.84 AC 9200 N ORACLE RD SEC 24-12-13 TUCSON AZ (FORMERLY 203-36-064C) 85704-0000 Valuation Data: Valuation Year Legal Class Assessment Ratio Land FCV Imp FCV Total FCV Limited Value Limited Assessed 2016 COMMERCIAL (1) 18.0 $482.962 $1,138,128 $1,621,090 $1,621.090 $291,796 2017 COMMERCIAL (1) 18.0 $482,962 $1,097,192 $1,580,154 $1,580,154 $284,428 Property Information: Section: 24 Town: 12.0 Range: 13.0E Map & Plat: / Block: Tract: Rule B District: 5 Land Measure: 15.84A Group Code: Census Tract: 4706 Use Code: 1040 (MISC COMMERCIAL) File Id: 1 Date of Last Change: 1/7/2009 Commercial Characteristics: Property Appraiser: Donald Burton Phone: (520)724-7426 Commercial Summary Interface Total Sq Ft Cost Value CCS Override Market Override Y 11.870 $1,097.192 $0 $0 Commercial Detail SEQSECT Construct Year Model/Grd IPR Sq Ft RCN RCNLD Model Description 001-001 1990 903/3 0000000 11,870 $1,332,890 $1,002,333 CHURCH 002-001 2000 290/3 0000000 0 $151.074 $94.859 PARKING LOT Valuation Area: Condo Market: 11 DOR Market: 12 MFR Neighborhood: NC_LA_MADERA SFR Neighborhood: 01007110 SFR District: 6 Supervisor District: (1) ALLY MILLER Recording Information: Sequence No. Docket Page Date Recorded Type 0 6292 974 6/3/1980 Parcel Note: Click to see/expand 2 note(s) v http://www.asr.pima.gov/links/frm_Parcel.aspx?eq=5gBIRQyiNzKwUGSC76ZgAVu... 4/1/2016 oQo J�yEV -...-.� SOUNDED A911' Town of Oro Valley Development and Infrastructure Services May 23, 2018 Eric R. Barrett ARC STUDIOS 317 E. Flower Street Tucson, AZ 85716 Re: OV1600907, Detention Basin revision (turf material) Please note Engineering does not object to the material type, provided the work does not impact the basin's capacity and functionality. If you have any questions, please call me at (520)229-4824. Sincerely,! Esteban C Tineo, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer cc: File Oro Valley, it's in our nature. 11000 N. La Canada Drive, Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 www.orovalleyaz.gov I phone: (520) 229-4800 1 fax: (520) 742-1022 March 30, 2016 Ed. Marley Title/Department Swaim Associates, Ltd. 7350 E. Speedway Blvd #210 Tucson, AZ 85710 RE: Traffic Statement Canyon Del Oro Baptist Church Sanctuary Building and Youth Center. EEC Project No.16006 - SCOPE We have reviewed the proposed additions to Canyon Del Oro Baptist Church with a total site size of 15.9 acres. The project is located in Section 24, Township 12 South, Range 13 East, G. & S.R.M., Pima County, Arizona. EXISTING CONDITIONS Canyon Del Oro Baptist Church is a privately owned church. The existing site has 8 daily employees. Ingress/egress for the property is via Egleston Memorial Drive, a private roadway that connects to E Calle Concordia to the south, and Oracle Road to the north. This roadway is shared by the school to the north. The Church's usage has non -peak hours (weekends) while the school has peak hours (Mon — Fri). SITE ANALYSIS This project consists of the addition of a sanctuary building and a youth center building. The sanctuary building and youth center will have 8 daily employees. There are currently 66 spaces for the 8 employees. After the additions, there will be approximately 16 employees, and 166 parking spaces. The peak use of the site is at non -peak hours (weekends). CONCLUSION Due to the intended use, minimal increase in daily traffic (8 employees), and scheduling of services (weekends), we do not expect a significant impact the onsite private street, Oracle Road, or Calle Concordia. Sincerely, t nai ICAT0 ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC. 39528 0 RYAN RICHARD STUCKI r i Ryan Stucki, PE, LEED AP Project Manager www.eec-info.com �--xP.feS Environmental Se -ices ! Flood CttnT101 & Dtainage I land Development Land Surveying ( transpattation ! walee & wastewater Tucson - Pboenlx TOWN OF ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES DEPARTMENT 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE, ORO VALLEY, AZ. 85737 PHONE: (520) 229-4800 FAX: (520) 742-1022 www.orovallevaz.gov/dis 1.2 GENERAL APPLICATION FORM Application Type: ❑ Major General Plan Amendment ❑ Final Plat ❑ Rezoning/PAD Amendment ❑ Pre -Application ❑ Planned Area Development ❑ Zoning Verification ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Sign Criteria ❑ Zoning Code Amendment ❑ Sign - PAD Exemption ❑ Conceptual Site Plan ❑ Master Sign Program ❑ Conceptual Public Art ❑ Communication Facility — Tier 1 and 2 Minor ❑ Conceptual Architecture ❑ Communication Facility — Major ❑ Final Site Plan ❑ Revised Development Plan —.00- Conceptual Landscape Plan ❑ Other Subject Property Information: Address: 9200 N. Oracle Rd. Tucson, AZ 85704 Parcel/Tax Code: Subdivision / Commercial Center Name: 225-10-064C Book / Page or Sequence Number: Lot Number(s) Legal Description: IRR PCL BEING PT OF 5545' OF LOT 2 Section/Township/Range: 24-12-13 Area of Property: 15.84 acres Existing Land Use: Church Proposed Land Use: Church Applicant Information: Applicant *: * If more than one, attach list Name:Tim Smith Firm: Swaim Associates Architects, AIA Address: 7350 E. Speedway #210 city -Tucson State: AZ zip: 85710 Telephone: 520-326-3700 Pax: 520-326-1148 Email: tsmith@swaimaia.com Property Owner(s) if different from Applicant *: Name: Jerry Drobinski (Elder Board Chairman)Firm: Canyon Del Oro Baptist Church Address: 9200 N. Oracle Rd. city: Tucson state: AZ Zip: 85704 Telephone: 520-297-3900 Fax: Consultant: Name: Address: Telephone: Email: �jerry@globaldands.com (Discipline) Firm: City: _ Fax: Email: 4 State: Zip: Proiect Descri[AlonlNarrative: Th . cLjrrent nrni _ct is Phan _ 3 of the CDOBC Cam. a nansi-ip, dncumentPd in Master Development plan number OV12-05-05. This project includes the Sanctuary building, Youth Building and the north„portion of the parking lot. Attached submittal is for landscaping of the site. I hereby certify that I have read and examined this application and know the same to be true and correct. I am the owner of the property or the Owners authorized representative, and if not the owner, I have obtained the owner's permission to perform stated work. All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this type of work will be complied with whether specified herein or not. The approval of this application does not presume to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of any other federal, state or local law for which this project may be subject to. Notice: It is the applicant/owner's responsibility to ensure all private rules and regulations (such as Covenants, Conditions & Restrictions (CC&R's)) of the subdivision and/or commercial center are adhered to. Contact your Home Owners Association or property management to determine applicable requirements. It is also the apblicanj�lfe�ppnsibility to coordinate with all outside agencies to secure their acceptance or clearance. Failure to do s may d i uance of permits. See attached list of agencies. -tl" s;`'I1Tt+ Y-12 44 Applicant's SibaAure Print Name Date Important Note: All submittals received after 4:00 p.m. will be processed the next day Submittals will be reiected if: • Not folded using Pima County fold & collated; • There are missing items on the checklist unless otherwise approved by Planning Division Manager or Town Engineer. • Re -submittals cannot be accepted without a transmittal and a written narrative summary describing the purpose of submittal. 5 EXHIBIT A OV12-05-05 CDO BAPTIST CHURCH Master Development Plan 1. Provide a passenger drop off area as required by the OVZCR. The location is subject to the Planning & Zoning Administrators approval. .2,'. Provide 100 year frequency flows for each drainage course entering or leaving the site. Provide updated drainage report. 4f Provide and label concentration points for each on -site watershed sub -basin. 5,- Clearly identify and label any anticipated or proposed cross parking connections. 6-. / Show and label all concentration points and Q 100 values on both drainage maps. 7� Provide flow arrows showing drainage patterns throughout the site on both maps. 8 Indicate how the catch basins drainpipes are sized. Identify drainage points on proposed conditions drainage map similar to the existing conditions drainage map. Phase I Development Plan 1�)Provide hydraulic calculations for the sizing of the catch basin drainpipes. 6-LDIV PLANNING\OV\OV Pre-2006\OV12\2005\12-05-05\Reports\TC.MDP.report.doc TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PROJ#: OV 1 205-05 ZONE: PS & C Adm. Address: 1 9200 N. ORACLE RD eneral notes CANYON DEL ORO BAPTIST CHURCH MASTER DEVELOIPMENT PLAN 9200 NIB ORACLE RD. ORO VALLEY, AZ 85704 1. GROSS AREA OF PARCEL: 16.84 ACRES (689,993 SF) 9 ACCESS ACROSS FLOOD PRONE AREAS TO BUILDING SITES WILL BE APPROVED 14. PER ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE: APPROXIMATE TOTAL OPEN AREA = 13.02 ACRES (567151 SF) BY THE TOWN ENGINEER AND SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DRAINAGE WAYS ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO APPROVED PLANS SET ASIDE AREA OUTSIDE OF CONSTRUCTION AREA = 10.28 ACRES (447.726 SF) DEVELOPER. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY PERMITS FROM THE TOWN ENGINEER AND/OR BUILDING OFFICIAL FOR PARCELS AFFECTED. 2. ASSESSOR'S TAX PARCEL NUMBER IS: 22510-%4C-3 10. THE PROPERTY OWNER, HIS SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS AGREE TO 1) KEEP ALL REWIRED LANDSCAPED AREAS MAINTAINED IN A WEED FREE, TRASH FREE 15. ALL EASEMENTS SHOWN ARE EXISTING 3. EXISTING ZONING IS PS&C CONDITION, 2) REPLACE ANY DEAD PLANT MATERIALS WITHIN D3 DAYS AND 3) MAINTAIN THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IN PROPER WORKING ORDER. 16. EXISTING ELECTRICAL SERVICE EASEMENT PER OOCN ET 5816. PAGE 745. 4. BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE: 9.300 SF EXISTING 11. THIS MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN HAS BEEN SUBMITTED CONCURRENT WITH 17. EXISTING WATER LINE EASEMENT PER DOCKET 12257, PAGE 1114. <721b SF DEMOLITION A DEVELOPMENT PLAN, OV 012-05-05. THAT DEVELOPMENT PUN 23.231 SF NEW ADDRESSES PHASE 1 OF THIS MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN. ALL FUTURE IS. APPROVED IMPROVEMENT PLANS AND APPROVED INSURANCES WILL 23,085 SF TOTAL PHASES WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTALS. BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERK ITS. FA.R. 23,085/689,990 = G33 12 TUCSON WATER IS CURRENTLY SERVING THE CHURCH. UPON IMPLEMENTATION 19 12%OF FRONTAGE TO REMAIN OPEN SPACE'. OF PHASE 1 A NEW WATER SERVICE WILL BE CONNECTED TO THE ORO VALLEY TOTAL FRONT BOUNDARY 1074' 5. DEVELOPER WILL COVENANT TO HOLD TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ITS SUCCESSORS WATER MAIN. REQUIRED TO REMAIN OPEN 13O AND ASSIGNS, HARMLESS IN THE EVENT OF FLOODING. PROVIDED OPEN SPACE 996' 13. PARKING ANALYSIS: 6. DRAINAGE WILL NOT BE ALTERED, DISTURBED OR OBSTRUCTED WITHOUT THE RECONFIGURED EXISTING ASPHALT 70 (3 HC) 20. ORACLE ROAD SCENIC COORADOOR DISTRICT. 60%VIEW CORRIDOR TO 300' APPROVAL OF THE ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL. CONTOUR PARKING 92 (6 HC) FROM PROPERTY LINE. = TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED 162 19 HC) 7, BASIS OF BEARING: RECORDED BEARING IS THE RECORDED BEARING PER THE 21. DESIGN VEHICLE FOR ALL VEHICLE TRAFFIC IS SU-30 /.T 15 MPH. DESCRIPTION UPON THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE, BETWEEN THE FOUND SANCTUARY FIXED SEATING 800 PEOPLE, 21 EMPLOYEES MONUMENTATION, N 8V6915M. REQUIRED PARKING SPACES 158 I6 HC) 6 BICYCLE 8, BASIS OF ELEVATION AND SITE TOPOGRAPHY: PIMA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS GEODIC CONTROL POINT 'N21' ORTHDMETRIC HEIGHT, ELEVATION OF 2591.21, NAVD 88. hasina narrative THE IMPLEMENI ATION OF THIS MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS ANTICIPATED TO TAKE PLACE IN FOUR PHASES. THESE PHASES AND THEIR ANTICIPATED TIMELINES ARE AS FOLLOWS; PHASE ONE: SANCTUARY EXPANSION. ADMINISTRATION EXPANSION, AND WEST PARKING LOT UPGRADES, ANTICIPATED TIME FRAME: 8TO 12 MONTHS. (DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTED CONCURRENT WITH THIS MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN.) PHASE TWO: CHILDREN'S EDUCATION BUILDING, ADULT EDUCATION BUILDING, RELATED LANDSCAPING, WATER HARVESTINGIDETENTION IMPROVEMENTS. NO ADDITIONAL PARKING REWIRED. ANTICIPATED TIME FRAME: 3TO 5 YEARS. PHABE THREE: YOUTH BUILDING, RELATED LANDSCAPING, WATER HARVESTINGtDETENTION IMPROVEMENTS. NO ADDITIONAL PARKING REWIRED. ANTICIPATED TIME FRAME: 5 TO 7 YEARS. PHASE FOUR: NEW SANCTUARY, EXISTING SANCTUARY CONVERTED TO FELLOWSHIP HALL WITH KITCHEN ADDITION, CONSTRUCT NEW CONTOUR PARKING TO NORTH, RELATED LANDSCAPING. WATER HARVESTINGIDETENTION IMPROVEMENTS FOR BUILDING AND PARKING AREAS. ANTICIPATED TIME FRAME: 7TO 10 YEARS. THE DESCRIBED PHASES ARE CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE IN ORDER AND SCHEDULE DEPENDANT ON CHURCH PRIORITIES AND DEMOGRAPHICS. SEC. 24. T12S. R13E. G8SRB8M. PIMA COUNTY, A2 location map-1; 3- ■ I miles sheet index 1. GENERAL NOTES AND SITE PLAN 2. ENLARGED SITE PLAN LINDA'VISTA- CORNER j i « I _ ✓/ . q�� �p 3_ sITEDETUIs TOWN HOUSES, %Y �l l � ,l/i j - `� - ga48 - -- .fie NORTHEAST FNDD GILD BCRASS' TIOI DAP II - :'F key notes (� LOTS 1.63 1 SANCTUARY (PHASE IV)18.120 S.F. MAX HEIGHT ZONING R1-144\ FROM ADJACENT GRADE 2S f ' _ - _ III: 2. YOUTH JAC AREA (PHASE III)20913.F. MAX HEIGHT FROM N I ADJACENT GRADE 18' 3. ADULT CLASSROOMS (PHASE II) 2286 S.F. MAX HEIGHT FROM ADJACENT GRADE 18' ZONING J ZONING PS&C - 1"F� 111 ,/ M1�' / / r '? /F i-- \ \ / I / 4 MAX HEIGHT FROM ADJACENTKASEGRADE4 859 S.F. I 21-144- < <D S/e b PUSCH RIDGE 1 Rnce6�D �� CHRISTIAN ACADEMY as° � 3 135 MIDDLEIHIC�f I SCHOOL a EXISTING BUILDINGS FND. S/8 ItE➢AR 6. EXPANSION OF EXISTING BUILDINGS (PHASE 1) TAOGEO 4S 1017 - 7. KITCHEN PHASE N w•e' S 89'S 35' E 1258.01 [N) , , r , Th,- B. AMPHITHEATER PHASE 111 9 ➢ 9 eI , - 20 3N`TBACK FROM PS&C ( ) _ _ _ _ )EV- ;E'!AAM.Mr,__0YI[jfT_Mirtr Ei('EASIiI yr--.-•-•--7 _._._ _._.-._ _._._._._._ ._._.-._.-.-. _._. -.-................ H 9. WATER HARVESTING DETENTION AREA (PHASED 10 1 1 - I WITH IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT STRUCTURE) [ / PARKING 1 =:_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._. _ _ _._._._ _._ _ r, �r t 70 PARKING PARK84Cj / PHASEN i - DESIGN BPEEDMP�H,SDESIGN VEHICLES=SU-30 PARKING _JV EXISTING PARKING WITH IMPROVEMENTS (PHASE I) !r /'� - 100 RECREA ION SETBACK I DESIGN SPEED= ISMPH,DESIGNVEHICLES=SU-30 / � _ _ � - �,_ o _ _.� ._._._.a-•-•_ _._._._._ - Tom._._._._. _ _ ��� ._.�._ - _.�..�._, / 1R1 § EI _ _ 4•� i , 112. FUTURE CROSS CONNECTION OF PARKINGBETWEEN �X SCHOOL AND CHURCH PARKING LOTS. / vIF P UILDING I 13 "^;O I �� { .I 13. PASSENGER DROP OFF AREA. r } 14. EXISTING CROSS PARKING AND ACCESS CONNECTION. 1 I 1 �V4�V L VA Z'NR.- 777 r / / / • 6 }_) /I O / /\ P J jI I. l V •/{(CLERK OF THE TOWN OF ORO P-IV l \ J\ 2 \\ VALLEY REBY CERTIFY THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN WAS O 1 _ -�" 1 I ' APPROVED BY THE MAYOR 6 COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF I I ORO VALLEY ON THE / B ING 7;��_� DAY OF A10Vlw�W , 8 U HIS PORTION OF THE SITE TO ♦ E 1 REMAIN UNDISTURBED PS&C ZONING PARCEL I II R T 5/B BUILDING 1 PACE �. I , i." -_ 1 225-10-�64C•3 �[%0•. ( / GGED 3 ' ( ISTING / 0 GYG 3 ` _ 1 _ _ _ _ DXCT g20,PG 974 � CORONADO V CLERK, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY DATE E L 2§6D.5 C 9 DOMs J (� J 1; CANYON DEL ORO BAPTIST NATIONAL nI I yy, A'4J. �PH SEy I ADUL - 2� 1 / - CHURCH � 'wRW $e- Phase- � !�)e_ Aam Wn'f PHASE I / 4 t - .I FObtEST KIN / l jFEF DING LASSROOM , PIYOUT MA OUNTY WASTEWATER FFE.. / I UILDING O FFE-2688 ' _ " -' I �u Owner J-�- 1 L! I_ `RASE 11 B PHASE III l', /J �� k ILDING (9� /� / le / 1- ��' ,� / ' 4 - I i Z CANYON DEL. OR CLERO CHURCH .. `_ - �! _ `\ / I 9200 N. ORACLE ROAD TucsoN. ARrzow, B57a l 52o) z97-39oD l �Yc'� CONTACT: PASTOR STEVE VANKLEY , 1 / /_ Loobinlrjs teas J rr - - �Iifq,_ v� l'1 i legal description �'� _ Loop a ITS 19A�EFISTJ¢N€ - - - _ _ _ = - - - I BEING _ _ _ _ _., i IRREGULAR OF 8545' OF LOT 2LAC;PORTION N 115.84 T12S, It Ti83 PORTION OF t L nl �c-�`1�+•_--_ I �� - `I I V EY, PIMA COUNTY. ARIZONA / IIIESITE TOREMAIN I I \ _ _ ^^ R73E, GASMA COM. TOWN OF ORO - UNDISTLIRBEP- - ['1 _ _ -._ 10 -. ._ SETRACKfROM RI36 _ ................... _._ _ _ _ ��i - � �\ ■ �PORTI R•. - -- - ...1. - _''"'1' '* 1 _._ -- ------- _-_ - -7tl:� /'�'�_ \ ) _ t swarm MAIN THE To - - - -._ _ _ -. �.a _._ :.r .-'-' - -I-.- _ _ _ _. FiSR14y �.<LF4R FRQyT ._ .- - - - _...- _ _ -' - - - ._ --- - - r RE$if� -.�. - -' I', - 6,3 `� _ 2DI�o t ASSOCIATES LTD UNDISTURBED ;' 1 I A p z'e73�=-5 - EDWARD T. ARCHITECTS AIA _ _ 9'35' E MARLEY 80.96 E FT LOWELL 40Y TUCBON AR IZONA "712 FVD 5/8': R AR - - _ - H1�, TAGGED LS 0171 - I - r EAST 1/4 /HE DN 24 - qRFND/A' T" FACBMLE M80) UO-U 8 5 DNA U. w.eWelmel■.00m RL 3S9 - - .!sheet information '9BB'"SEC I]N 24 yA.CALLE CO ORDIA - - t 2LS 10171 �.__ DRAWING MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN r; iS BO21. _ ' - I - - _ / 11, / _ _-__ -__ _ - SCALE: I'=W-C' { 1 I �.. - -.-��....�. - _�___ s, ae'+e- - _ _ __ _ _ - - __ CONTOUR INTERVAL: 1'-T _ � n ND 1 ` l •' ./ LO 634i4 _ 2e"4>' V m SHADOW MOUNTAIN ESfAT S� Si` - / t O �` p w_E5T'/4t9RNER $EDTIDN 19� project information / L 7 SUBDIVISION � I / M O /-LOT] LOT 56 1�1 ,� 1 36 � ZONING ,�j -- LOT 55 I / I TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ORIGINAL CASE NUMBER: SINGLE 1 11 t I s(A° T BK 14, P B9 OV12-92-09 4 RESIDENCE \ * f -_, \� I/ j - 1 / CURRENT TOWN OF ORO VALLEY CASE NUMBER: FAMILY1 �. LE I m f I I I SINGLE - I J SIN LE 7 I 1 i \`��' I• ,I OV12-05-05 1 . _'.• V, AMILY 61NGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ', LV I \ \ / DATE OF ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL 02-10-05 ESIDE CE FAMILY I RE`:IDEN 1 -- I DATE OF THIS RESUBMITTAL: 03.17-06 -_ RESIDENC MINGLE : I DP B K 29 PG 93 S H T 1 OF 3 SHEET 1 OF 3 ♦1\'I `1 \- - `♦�♦ `♦ \ ��i' � y ----'"-,__-_`` "-ice:-`9.♦ 5 . ,' r r r 264 .5 I ffff{ f ' \ f f 9 r ♦ \ \ 1 r _ ♦`' _ - ♦ ` 1 r r x \ �l-- 19 ',I x, y y I „, f/26 a, \ ♦\ ♦♦---�5< _ �.� 1 \ 1 1\ 1\ 11 >/"���`-- _ - _� ♦\" -�`♦♦\ / / r r I/ I I ) I r� TS r , r t ', , YY `.,r.r+<`.`�♦ \\ 1\-=i--' 1 y \ \ !r r� ,- �__ .''�.`\ /•' ``♦_\ - �♦ \ //' r /,'' I I r f S � r I r 1 , r-�_ --. `,��\ ,/ `\t \\ \ \ _ __ ,' I I' \ ` `\ , r � r ram- ♦ _` \ '� , / / � l� / r I I f r r / / � ,'. " 1 1`�---`'- I l r♦ - \ I I � \ \ \ \ \\0111�1111'1 2644.261 2645.3 2f>4N 2Pt 2647 G 5� , x - L 2G60.2' '' . ♦ \ 1 i r f'265`�-- t y r -�t 6�O.0 1 \ ! 1 j r� ` �� , ♦v x 2d51.$ i --- i --/ ' `♦ I \ I \ \ FN� 5/$i FI3AR`- x I-- --1 --yy- - f} `♦ \,j, r' 1 , ` I/-" .-I- -`__ \\`\♦ \` 1 �., I t\ ,/ �`' r� ♦`\, GRAPHIC SCALE TACj Eh �5�13 73 r 2656.G 1 .{ \-"- , ,S ' 'w _ _ _ 1 `�♦ 1 x 2671.4 ao 0 is 30 60 / - - - ` \ \ ♦ 1 r� _ 264 .1- I p' S e� „ y I 1 r .__- ` ' ; r' ' `-- ` \ ♦ \ r - ' I 48. t,'. -- _ ♦ Tl� r , r , 1 I , r'' `S 4.3 ' - S CONTOUR INTERVAL / ' \ 2G44.7 `� \ _L f 58.2 \i 62.2 'I / ;y 67.1 2646 ` \68.� `` \ 55.4 9.a I .-� IGISING YETI Q�I 17 > 1 \ 1 4.0 r r'/ I f r If ,','rf♦` _ _ ' r 264 Df % 00.7�51 - `♦ \ `I\. 2 T - - - -_ _I __ `.♦. 1 62.2 I_-� ♦ `1 67.1 I 1 0.1 I '- - -- - -- ♦1 ` /� 26' x ��s 54.4 �` - -- / ; , B e 7 2�6.2 I /1 LEGEND x 413.6 i r - 50.0 y. , 11 . F\ '\ - - _ S II rr j ,' i \ - _ �♦`"� Z)- ` _ •� ,•4. ♦` ♦` ♦ ` ( B - t TYP '� -/ I O� I ' ' '' I ' 11 \I \� (�'/ '/ - 3\� - sr.�-�\ ♦♦♦\4 ♦ 59. r.� `♦ I c"I' j/ n l 1 .2 _ p 0. \p / �r' , ' , 1 ! i i i f � \ ` \\ .. ` `� Z " - , _ ._ _ 58.2\ \ \ ♦. '64.3 I\ 66.0 _ _ \ ' - � ' , / ,r. ' ! 11 \ r I 3 r --" � r ''� qy•�'��L=�. `\� _ ♦ ♦ ♦ O 2 1 r ). I / / r /'�• b . �+, '' ' y i l ♦ 1 I NL 7.4 / x 2675.3' r UI i r I' N. 2t 1 O I ' r //'/ ' r / �3 l� / `ti % ., �- Li `. -" x ♦ ' ., X�.�\ ,. f , II I r x i \ Sy -, SST 5/8'�R �AR ,'/'•;' ; f'Y /r/ Yam/ ' T GGED RLS1 `37 ; --' ' I o TG• _ , I s1 Ew51 1l0 _` ♦ x r r m T_ X ♦�♦. I - - 1 , li s /. `♦ \ 267' \6 17 1 1\- I f I , r I , \yV ( ,,/ / / r ,�� -w__ .+t'' Via.. % ,'�i r I � j ♦\ \ \\ \ 50.3 1 , r / r f 1 ♦ 1 r � y 1 / �. '. s0�,2._- _� / _ d 7.4 ' ! 1 I `♦`, ,. I T15/8 _d W 1 ♦; -_ - II x - C5� 4GGEDx Qk ZSfiCafl / � ir/ r rf r ♦ _. ! % y , I i t ♦)r ; I 1 �<u��u�� .. O I' y�'qr � • 1 �. 3. ,I , - y ♦ \ 1 I \ I • �,,..--,-.-,. >`.+iI�CNErt Jam_ ',, yr i a I ♦ ,/ , ♦ � \ 1 \ 1 ♦ ♦ r r, I. .�" 1 Q r r r ..26Y23' - / r FEATURE NEW EXISTING CONTOUR LINE -AO-- -a- PROPERTY LINE ---- AC PAVEMENT Rc-t�--crc-c�crc .tr,T-c�-t�c'�t-Rc CURB, SINGLE SIDEWALK BUILDING EXTERIOR WALL BLOCK WALL WATER OR GAS OW OR G ❑ W OR O METER BOX WATER OR GAS VALVE ® .-w-- ®. WATER LINE - -- W 10'- - - GAS LINE r---G--- SANITARY SEWER .. .. - - S- - - - STORM DRAIN - - - -SS - - - -SS- FIRE LINE .....•-i}C .. STREET LIGHT... .. o-C.. FIRE HYDRANT ♦ b TRAFFIC SIGN, SINGLE POST. MANIM SANITARY SEWER . O MANHOLE, STORM SEWER ... O ... Y CLEAN OUT .. OaO... 1`C.O. . ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER, PAD MOUNTED 13 DRAINAGE ARROW �► -► ♦ P I I 26 6.1 :' r' ♦ 1 ' \` "� I x 2659.5 11 liri y�♦ a I r f r ' i I \ X 2646.9♦\\ I`_`Vrr \\\ 11\ .t ! \\\ \\` 111 i ♦ \INAH^ ER y�������� \l�ytl`'�t_ \ �.` �.�: Qg r b .8 I 11' / t !` / ,r `\\ 64 B a cuE T 9 2. )6.6 / ` 7 i�l I I 2651.5, �GQ `C - l o o �.%-�' x109 YR FL00(3.LIMIT 59.6 '\�`tl�N� ♦ \(1 , �"' ; G i r rl ` x �1'' ---- - _ ( 2657.4 /^♦ - _ - 1 �^oo _ B y , r 1"- \ /i > \00 x2650.51r\` x26T1.71r`1 1j rl 'zG56.6-- - - - --- --- ` i G§0 es4 ti rL .' , `I 2653.3 X \�6g6.4\ ' r/ 59.E Q100> y ����` "__-_-_-P665-�_`-`�_'-~�'-'��i ,/� _ _-\ � ♦r(b e `' X �'�''�_\1_/ �' .' 16�j,---`I1 I \♦( /,'/' /�___ ♦-` y. !` ( Gi / Iy�63pCfg.660.7� y yr , ♦\ �/M. �65'♦--i--__.' 'f.' �' __ 1D0.1'R FLOOD LIMIT ---\\ �a 1 2662.6X r ♦ p it- - ' ' \ , '^ 8-- - y Fi 75 ��� _ r�� I I r - �\� _ _- 2661.6 j / I x '-Zz. - ' _ t y X 0100.566CF5 y / , _� 0\r tea♦ 12653g, ' i _ y r , x , ^�_ r I ♦ 1 \ f J- mod/ ' - - ^ 1� --- ' ' ___T - 1 I x / 2651.4 ` , (� ,' - - / _ 1 I < I ` `\ /' 2660 2 ry 2650y8 ,-,*\\ (,' - _` .. / r ♦\ 2664.7 x I , / . ---- �' '"- _ 1 x / `♦ ♦� ' I ♦` /' 2663.5 KEY NOTES ♦ 0 y 11 I 1 ----\\ r \ - ♦ w� �'( l 1. CATCH BASIN W/FIRST FLUSH FILTER INSERT ♦ ♦ \I ' ! ! r / ^`\. 2266 6 J 1 2. PIPE FROM CATCH BASIN TO LOWER PARKING LOT `\ ♦ ` ' r - - r ` ` , - - _ 3. SMALL DETENTION POND `\ \\ 1 `\ ! I IIr,I,I I rf y` `\ J \ ^ 4. CONCRETE HEADWALL W/18" PIPE TO CATCH BASIN r! f I `\ \\ \ - z665 - \ y x - i 2661k - x� ♦, S. BLEEDER PIPE TO EVACUATE POND IN 12HR5 1\ .' / i ' 1 i I x \ £ ♦; \ \ ' - _ 1 2667.7,' - , -' X . r' f 1 I -' I �. - ` , 26�3 ♦ ' �\ 169.7.-S9'35' E2653:3 1078.86'(R_) • ' -- - ♦,' _ x \ _r --- r \ ,- _ x \\ r' Cwsr lr/2 1 €La I -N 9°'5 6'_ E 1Q79,04'CM)- /�'`I x2G64�5 r //26G7.3 `\\♦ -`/',/ 1''$�' ,' \ ` ` ,/ _ `.``\ ♦\ , _ _ ,--_' - _ DOWL =BAR - I € _ I Y _ _ " ---- i. 54 j ; -��-' ' �� xzwJ4 TAGGED LS 10f71 tL` ~fit=- `y=-Yb65.--� r ,' `___" -- 0 672.2DI 3` `:__ ---' l - - : ■ N O 1 N ■ ■ R • r/ / -' / 1 'FR _ - - - - - _ - - - _ ` - - - -'kM - 166 wnt AbmM° S4wl Tu- A i- 6S70/ , - - - -'" ^ _ - - _ - - , = _-- PHONE (520) 362-0636 FAX (520) 624 0384 / _ _ T40165 T100-W D P y//B K -24 PIG , 9 3" S HT -'2 0 F' 3 CALLS CONCORDIA ,' , owner CANYON DEL ORO BAPTIST CHURCH 6200 N. ORACLE ROAD TUCSON. ARIZONA B5737 (520)267-3WO CONTACT: PASTOR STEVE VANKLEY legal description IRREGULAR PARCEL BEING PORTION OF S545' OF LOT 2; 16.34 AC; T12S, R13E, GDSRB6M, TONM OF ORO VALLEY. PIMA COUNTY. ARIZONA ° swaim ASSOCIATES LTD ANOREw ARCHRECTS AIA 4, INa l� ON A1�LI p~LBB! PAOSSINUIN MISS US-" a wwww sheet information DRAWING: MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN SCALE : 1' - 30'-0' project information TOWN OF ORO VALLEY CASE NUMBER: OV12-05-05 ORIGINAL DEVELOPMENT CASE NUMBER OV12-02-09 DATE: 01-25-06 SHEET 2 OF 3 i NTS PROPOSED GRADE 73.2 THROUGH LANSCAPE — ISLANDS 70.1 —�' -' EXISTING GRADE 68.3 PROPOSED GRADE O DRIVEWAY - - -- - THROUGH DRIVEWAY 67.1 4.5% 64.3 J 62.2 ----"*-"—EXISTING _ --' GRADE O LS ISLANDS 59.4 4.5% 58.2 45% 55.4 -- - - -^ ^ ^J a CONCRETE CURB W/ 12" CONCRETE /AREA WATER HARVEST CURB CUTS OVERFLOW EXCEDING 1/2' TREATMENT RETAINING WALL-,,,,,,,// ASPHALT a WEEP HOLE -,,,,,a FIRST 1/2TREATMENT CB W/FIRST FLUSH owner ASPHALT FILTER INSERT DEPTH TO PROVIDE DETENTION STORAGE CANYON DEL ORO BAPTIST CHURCH 0200 N. ORACLE ROAD TUCSON, ARIZONA E6777 DRAIN PIPE SIZED TO CARRY FIRST 1/2' OF RAINFALL PAST RSTEV PASTOR STEVE VANNLEV BLEEDER PIPE TO ENSURE NO STANDING WATER ��C..IONTACT. legal description 6" MINUS ""•,�..:I DRAIN ROCK " IRREGULAR PARCEL BEING PORTION Y' ; • OF 36/6• DF LOT 2; 15.84 AC; T12S. RUE, GLSRBLM, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY��ARIZONA 2 Swaim LANDSCAP ATER HARVESTING ISLAND 1U141 �, ,, 3013 NTS r °a43121 •4 �• ASSOCIATES LTD _ _ - ANDREW AR%MCTS AIA NG C MM B PT LOMai SSS 4 T1rDeoN AlaalwSS►887e an 0 S1S•11/S Yr1YVJt.FeYNSIS.�em sheet information - --. WANING : MA87ER DEVELOPMENT PLAN SCALE: MS CONTOUR INTERVAL: WA a project information D OW TOWN OF ORO VALLEY CASE NUMBER: OV12-D"5 DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMECASE NUMBER: OY12-/I-00 ATE: d 01.2&N ■NO IN ■ ■Ft• DP BK 29 PIG 93 SHT 3 OF 3 PHONE the wM AIan.Ee S4..L Tuewn, AH:orq 0.5701 "°`u°'�°-�96 »°°`'62'°>e` SHEET I OF Oracle Road Scenic Corridor Ovarlav parkin. Island¢• J 'i Ire 1 / 1 r r r :x < 1 r' r, utilize a lusher palette to effect an oasis qualty. Adjacent land uses shall be buffered. Northern parking lot drainage shall be, in part, captured in the planting islands. "Soft" paving will be endeavored to be used in the northern parking area. ORSCOD requirements are observed, and parking lot plant requirements are observed. Finally, a large portion of the she, the east end, has been designated as Natural Open Space. Lush entry oasis/ Drop off area. Acoerd and courtyard trees and accent understory. Mitigation (Plan( Replacement) area MASST'E\RPLAN PLANT LEGEND l "—f----Shade Tree Courtyard Tree �--- Acowd Tree G---- Existing Tree SAGE Y ! •.r _Yim ' ' Lower planting td ... site views ,1 .'respect Natural Open Space.(N.O.S.) boundary; -.Eastern portion of she setaside a's open space. r ® r J i 1 HAS 1 �a l t,^^ � , 1 Town of Ord Valley.watet main easement :No trees only shrubs . - - and accenhi thin easement -. R6adwayremoved• S A, � r -and are9 revegetsted- e _ 1 srxc r . w•-D• 0 2040' K. 1nN 0409 08.18.05 nNsbrN 1. NASMa INFORMATION ADDED0e0106 Ow0 N .J : F OU W OZ IN u }~o V2 m 8 i-in tiTATF. OF ARIZONA f• 1 hereby certify that the within COUNTY OF PIMA I ,s- nrmcnt was filed for record t :amlp. State of Arirona Witrk%% my hark) and O Indexed Paxevl r a Ily f(iQ R:t'.F.' .i'v1Y1H Nr4 County Recorder Y Hy CUL ->> Fkftflt, RIGHT OF WAY I.ASrjm-%-r ' PAW VSBDS BAPTISTcm= OP TI off. ARI Ca No. 07337o Book Date: JUL 12.1918.-joggAM rU1`'; l.. y h y ems. y` EL valuable comideration, the receipt of which is herebyhereinafter called "Grantor." for good ELECTRIC COMPANY, an Arirona corporation, its sttccesson and aedgns, hereby grants and conveys unto TUC.SON GAS dt Of way to construct, operate, and maintain underground electric lines and appurtenant f cilitiea for the Iran miwion a dhereinafter called -Grantee." an ca%ementad tribht lion of electricity upon. through, over, under, and acn„s the lands and any and all parcels and portions thereof hereinafter described. The lands in which said casement and right of way is hereby granted arc owned by Grantor in Ice simple, are situated in the County of Pima. State of Arizona, and are Particularly deccnbed as follows, to is it: A 10-toot wide strip of land, being 5 feet each side of a centerline located within a portion of the East Half of the HE} of Section 24, Township 12 South, Range 13 East, G&MU3M Pi particularly described as follows: ' Pima County, Arizona, more Commencing at the East 0garter corner of said Section 24; thence N 890 59' 35" W, along the south line of the 2fE of said Section 24 a d.�p 348 of approximately 1172 feet to a Point, said Point also being 348 feet east of the easterly Right of W the Tucson -Florence Highway, and the TRUE POINT OF REG Zinn o! said centerline; of the thence in a northeasterly direction a distance of 210 feet to a point, said point lying 320 feet east of the easterly Right of Way line of the Tucson -Florence Highway, and the Terminus of the herein -described centerline. Grantee shill have the right to exratate for. place, lay, comirtuct. operate, use, maintain, repair, replace. reconunlct, enlarge. alter. impmvc. aJd a,, relocate, and, or renk+ve at any time and from rinse to time, underground electric facilities therein consisting Of conduits. manhole, handholc., pullla,sc,-s, and junction hoses with wires and cables placed therein, and alwve ground structures consisting of transformer pads. Iransformen, service pcJcsrats. rise. pours with rcy111ted osrncc:td corxhlctom. and appurtenances necessary for life operation of said underground facilities and all rnswullam,11% equipment and material connected therewith. Grantee shall have the right of ingre, io and egress from said easement by a practical route or retdc, in, upon, over, and acre%-. the hcreinbcfore dcwribcd Iand% or :tit% p moon ur portions thereof, logcther with the right to t lear and keep clear said cascment and right of way, from rtpl.,sises, utatcrialk. huilJings or alhcr strtuctures, implements, pleen, or aMtnu,don+. without limiting the generality of the forcgaing. Grantor shall not digtor doll :u y well, plant any use, eruct, pl building, wail fence or ace. or constnk9 ant' Pipeline, irrig:dion ditch, lake, pond. rasrmrnt :end right it( war•, ay.ili ,uucturc, not nuPound or score fluid, and or materials within the h lindaries of the above described (ht Of r ,hands rn+1 guru ease ur dcrrra,c the grefod surface cicvalions within lite b,nndarics of the ahovc described c:,semcnt and right of way csi,tint at the Jatr of ctccution of this instrument, nor shall the said ground surface he Pcnclratcd to a depth m rtrrs, of 12 inrhr, hr are rAd ur lmplcmcnt, without the previous written consent of the (ir.wt lion, the clearance ur gradc is, hanged in such way as to rrquirr rc•h+tation of the under raino.l fucditico. the ctt%l ucnt to co+nstrtc- ,hall be lumtc by (irultor or suhsequerlt owner. g 1 c rust of curb rch,cation All elect ,sal rquiPnlerlt instilled by (;ranter in and upon the herein decriltcd cascment shall remain the personal praperiy •r ,her it c .,nd ,hall not lit dermcd a Part of the tralty. t tit l, and ctil and r.N..r of wav'ahenevelrrinl(hrantrci juJgntenitthe smlllca�h+dl hr nrc«s:IPioy+e) anti ta �I1CttN,H CnCli 1ii 111the Imlahlllrl'trrrra of the right herein kranted. A-88578 6/12/78 )81.6.445 Grantor shall Not IaNt or dtdkact aN tritheat Mt °t "a, under recur "to by .r a r �•• tree f, or bove der .Nd "Went and P'rt � berth Iar+ud to the Craeta. Ppro.el, the right w eraNsfa led a � right o(tra boxra, /oe rraes(arNter (°M` mad C—Vty to Cranue the erduri� t to t °( war h wi ok «b "d yrae:weNt hersiNbe aWWW ced May s •tort mac" larir aoccun fo�etrh electrical �i� ribud'n btetreeN error '� ' the Z � uwft 'Par f t M ►W" during �tructiou o(CnNtre'a iskW facNi e � ProPtnr kerein sto trrctiouy a atri--..]Q__ftst iN ria. to uae for tie trip to de ie yhole a iN Part on reither dv ` "otuid��t aad d rot t1w ust b rmatp*gft smid riot 0( Wa raid rtrwiaated at such due a. aid iN' bseseet red right of rta graNted etwmtNt nNd aahuctiow it cos 6[ The terms, coreNanu sd coeditiom o(thie r Pkted. of laNd etariug aNd Mra. executors, adsinierrarora. �; aK�Nc red rig, o(war shall be The rerrN "CeaNror� shagdt t4 F1n �Cet'' a o(r•raNtor and ty uPa+ a� iw�e to ae 6esefit o(aNr to the plural a the :Ngxb" a loiter wader a tie c Ali terse rated iN the '�-a"a* "d aripr of the Grantee. aiNgaIst or in the Neuter grader shad aFPir IN "TNES1 MHFRP.OP, the Grantor has executed these Frem u this • day PALO VBBnF BMU TIST CEMCH OF TI1^larne ago nyme e STATEOP r14'I2o,vA 1• COUM OF r�I �t A : u• This Wtnmset was ackaowiedged before me, the i' r uedrreip:ed °°tarn Public, h—//�� o ('e: ,✓ ..� ,,, ..,,� %• c as the XIdar of l i •�f 15.1924 � Notary Fnblh: '2- a L8 0 N ,LZ-5 GENERAL NOTES: BUFFER YARD 1. Gross area of property: 15.84 acres (689,990 sf) North West 2. Total acres of graded area: 2.75 acres (119,825 sf) no buffer yard required oracle road scenic corridor overlay district 3. Area of created slopes: 0 acres (0 sf) trees required 9 4.- Total acres of undisturbed area: 5.62 acres (244,598 sf) East trees provided 9+ 5. Total amount of open space: no buffer yard required shrubs required 134 required: 4.76 acres (207,141 sf) shrubs provided 134 provided: 5.62 acres (244,598 sf) South 6. Total amount of landscaped courtyards or pedestrian malls: not applicable 7. Buffer yards required - refer to buffer yard chart: no buffer yard required north - no buffer yard required east - no buffer yard required south - no buffer yard required ` } ' west (oracle road) -oracle road scenic corridor overlay district (orscod) _ j}b- 8. Building setbacks: not applicable ; , 9. Perimeter streets: Oracle Road 150' row (public road) F 1 r 10. No special conditions are applicable to the project. y^ 1. or modifications area applicable to the project. ♦:'�° ', < . ` 1 No zoning variances pp p ) 12. General notes: a. Assurances for landscaping and re-ve -vegetation bonds must be posted prior to P 9 9 P issuance of grading permits. b. Property owner shall maintain buffer yard plantings to ensure unobstructed ' visibilityto motorists. All shrubs accents, and roundcovers shall not exceed � 9 , thirty (30) Inches in height within site visibility triangles. Trees within site visibility triangles will be maintained to ensure that branches/foliage is not below a height of six (6') feet.; / 1 c. In the event of abandonment of the site after grading/disturbance of natural areas, disturbed areas shall be re -vegetated with a nonirrigated hydro seed mix from ,• OVZCR Addendum D: Approved revegetation seed mix. d. All plant material shall meet the minimum standards contained in the current editions of the Arizona Nursery Association's Growers Committee Recommended Tree Specifications and the American Association of Nurserymen as to size, condition and appearance.' e. Property owner is responsible for maintaining the temporary irrigation system as long as necessary in order to transition plants over to natural sources. Any plant f /% 0 � materials that die in transition, for any reason, shall be replaced in accordance with'. , f Sec. 27.6.E.4., Maintenance. % - f. Materials within sight visibility triangles must be placed so as not to interfere with a .. ` visibility plane described by two horizontal lines located thirty (30) inches and";.:> seventy two (72) inches above finished grade of the roadway surface. g. Deep rooted vegetation and trees shall not be planted closer than 7.5' from a /Vf public water line. Exceptions for alternative design solutions such as root barriers 11 •' shall be considered on a case by case basis. 13. Project is design to meet the oracle road scenic corridor overlay district (orscod) criteria. REQUIRED NOTES: 1. In the event of abandonment, the proposed graded areas shall be re -vegetated with the Oro Valley approved re -vegetation seed mix. Created slopes shall be stabilized with slope stabilization standards and seeded with native seed mix. 2. All transplant material with a 3" caliper or 6' tall shall equate to a larger than 24" box tree. 3. 2" deep, 3" minus size rock to be placed in all landscape areas as noted. 4. 40% of the trees are 24" box size or larger. 5. The proposed wall shall be designed with color.and textures compatible with the adjacent buildings. 6. Assurances for landscaping and re -vegetation shrubs must be posted prior to issuance of grading permits. 7. All plant material to be irrigated by a fully automatic underground irrigation system complete with backflow preventer that meets all local codes. 8. Inorganic ground cover shall be placed 2" deep in all planting areas and non -paved areas. 9. The landscape plan shall be in conformance with the native plant preservation plan and all requirements set forth therein. MAINTENANCE PROVISIONS: 1. All landscape areas in the buffer yards and common areas will be maintained on a regular basis under the supervision of the homeowners association. This maintenance is to include pruning, fertilizing, clearing debris and weeds, and removing and replacing dead plants. 2. All landscape areas will be irrigated using an automatic, underground irrigation system. GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES: 1. Provide adequate plant spacing to ensure the survivability at plant maturity (section 27.6.c.2.i.1). 2. Prior to the release of landscape assurance, the landscape architect must provide a letter with registrant's stamp verifying that actual planting has been accomplished in a manner to preclude overcrowding (section 27.6.c.2.i.1). 3. The homeowners association is responsible for maintaining the irrigation system as long as necessary in order to transition plants over to natural sources. Any plant materials that die for any reason, shall be replaced in accordance with section 27.6.e.4, maintenance. 4. The homeowners association shall maintain all plants within the buffer yards to ensure obstructed visibility to motorists (sight visibility triangles). All shrubs, accents, and ground covers shall not exceed 2'-6" in height. Trees will be maintained to ensure that branches/ canopy foliage is not below a height of 6 feet. 5. No trees to be planted within min• dist. of 7'-6" of underground water lines. If trees are planted within 4' of line a root barrier is required encompassing the root ball of the tree. 6. Known easements are shown on landscape plan for reference only, refer to civil plans for all easements. MITIGATION NOTES: 1. Mitigation for significant native vegetation is required as shown on the summary chart and native plant preservation plans per the town of oro valley code section 27.6. 2. No mitigation is proposed for inventoried plant material per the previously approved Native Plant Preservation Plan (OV12-92-09). All Plant material that is viable and transplantable shall be salvaged. A monitoring report shall be provided as part of the salvage operations. 3. Riparian Habitat "C" documented on the approved master development plan is identified as Natural Open Space (NOS). No modifications are proposed to the NOS with this submittal. Areas impacted by previous disturbances shall be re -vegetated with native species, refer to the revised landscape plan. APPROVED BY: PL NNI •Z NING MINISTRATO -DATE LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN LANDSCAPE PLAN for CANYON DEL ORO BAPTIST CHURCH PHASE 3: NEW SANCTUARY OV1600907 { '��- LLL ;s.,'� . / ., •le,-! -i50' t •'`^.,... F i c r'' ! '^ _ 'n„ .'`^-, �'\ /. -„f %, ♦ t /i y' 1.,......,, 11 L no • ' * _ / /- N ° CH'fit .`lid A-C D _.. _ 1 M R* '' ' i r .,.♦ fff r,o ..,,. a�>e ,g� f ��`♦ ..S ry 'J'�-rt-E y'F «., n' /r, / -c { 4 f / f ro i § f f J 3 '` �\ �'.r ",S 89�... 1 71 i�" 1,2 .� i r��.£ /.... - :*`.i, .-.f/ ... - •♦ L / ' f / BK 14, PG 93 PLANT MATERIAL SCHEDULE - WATER USE Botanic Name Common Name Quantity Water Use Type ADWR Annual Use (gal.) Total Annual Use (gal.) Monthly Use (gal.) Prosopis velutina Velvet Mesquite 22 2 5,702 125,444 10,454 Parkinsonia microphylla Foothills Palo Verde 35 1 1,754 61,390 5,116 Olneya tesota Ironwood 2 1 2,741 5,482 457 Chilopsis linearis 'bubba' Semi -seedless Desert Willow 5 2 S,702 28,510 2,376 Pistacia x'Red Push' Red Push Pistache 11 3 18,276 201,036 16,753 Parkinsonia florida Blue Palo Verde 7 2 5,702 39,914 3,326 Prosopis grandulosa 'thomless' Thomless Texas Honey Mesquite 13 2 5,702 74,126 6,177 So hors secundiflora Texas Mountain Laurel 11 2 1,426 15,686 1,307 Cercis canadensis 'oklahoma' Redbud Oklahoma 3 3 1,974 5,922 494 Bahinia lunariodes 'white' Chihuahuan Orchid shrub 14 2 405 5,670 473 Dodonea viscosa Hop Seed 8 2 632 5,056 421 Simmondsia chinensis Jojoba 55 1 281 15,455 1,288 Salvia clevelandii Cleveland Sae 16 3 183 2,928 244 Ruellia brittoniana Baja Mexican Barrio Ruellia 36 3 117 4,212 351 Justicia californica Chuparosa 23 2 101 2,323 194 Viguiera parishii Goldeneye 41 2 57 2,337 195 Dalea frutescens Black Dalea 1 2 158 158 13 Salvia greggii Autumn Sage 5 2 57 285 24 Bouteloua gracilis Blue Grama 12 2 6 72 6 Calliandra californica Baja Fairy Duster 55 3 316 17,380 1,448 Celtis pallida Desert Hackberry 29 1 634 18,386 1,532 Acacia constricta Whitethorn Acacia 3 1 1,754 5,262 439 Acacia greggii Catclaw Acacia 22 1 1,754 38,588 3,216 Fouquieria splendens Ocotillo 16 1 281 4,496 375 Asclepias subulata Desert Milkweed 12 2 57 684 57 Euphorbia antisyphilitica Candelilla 67 1 39 2,613 218 Dasylirion wheeleri Desert Spoon 55 1 110 6,050 504 Hes eraloe parviflora Brakeli hts Yucca 80 1 70 5,600 467 Hesperaloe nocturna Nightblooming Hesperaloe 54 1 70 3,780 315 Ferocactus wisizenn Fishhook Barrel Cactus 65 1 10 650 54 Yucca pallida Pale Leaf Yucca 102 1 110 11,220 935 Carnegiea gigantea Saguaro 15 1 2,741 41,115 3,426 Lophocereus schotii Totem Pole Cactus 8 1 634 5,072 423 Peniocereus greggii Nightblooming Cereus 1 1 10 10 1 Lantana montevidensis Yellow Trailing Lantana 30 3 263 7,890 658 Berlandiera lyrata Chocolate Flower 1 193 1 3 9 1,737 145 LANDSCAPE LEGEND Furnish and install landscape material per plans, details and specifications. All plant material to meet ANA specifications and be of sound health and appearance. Landscape Architect to hand select and tag all trees for project. Trees Size Qty Prosopis velutina salvage 4 velvet mesquite 24" box 18 Parkinsonia microphylla salvage 27 foothill paloverde 36" box 4 THIS 48" box 4 PROJD Olneya tesota 48" box 2 ironwood (native resources supply) contract salv. • Chilopsis lineans1 Bubba, semi -seedless desert willow Pistacia x 'Red Push' TM red push pistache Parkinsonia florida blue paloverde Prosopis grandulosa 'Thornless' thornless texas honey mesquite Sophora secundiflora texas mountain laurel Cercis canadensis 'oklahoma' redbud oklahoma Existing tree uJ r` -- Shrubs / Succulents s 0 Bauhinia lunariodes 'White' � co ; chihuahuan orchid shrub Dodonea viscosa hop seed Lu O Simmondsia chinensis p 0 - jojoba Salvia clevelandii ti.?. O s " cleveland sage At Ruellia brittoniana baja mexican barrio ruellia /r- Justicia californica chuparosa Viguiera parishii (Deltoidea) goldeneye ' �F> Dalea frutescens rr black dalea Salvia greggii a?� autumn sage Bouteloua gracilis o b,ue grama Scale: 1" = 100' ® Calliandra californica baja fairy duster HARDSCAPE/ GROUND COVER MATERIALS LEGEND Celtis pallida Furnish and install all material per plans, details, and specs. desert hackberry Concrete plaza and sidewalks Acacia constricta .'-... concrete sidewalk - 4" over 6" ab, refer to whitefhorn acacia specifications. � Acacia greggii Decorative rock catclaw acacia 1/2" screened rock - 2" depth in all landscape Fouquieria splendens areas - pioneer materials - santa fe brown ocotillo Decorative rock path Asclepias subulata 0" N-0 1/4" minus stabilized - 2" depth - pioneer desert milkweed materials - santa fe gold Euphorbia antisyphilitica Hydro -seed - mix 1 caylirio la 22 Ibs pure live seed - refer to specs. hydro Dasylirion wheeleri _ r seed mix - 1 desert spoon Botanical Name Common Name Ibs/ac Hesperalparviflora oe oe Ambrosia deltoidea triangle -leaf bursage 2.0 brakeli yucca Calliandra eriophylla fairy duster 1.5 �' Hesperaloe nocturna Celtis pallida desert hackberry 1.5 nightblooming hesperaloe Lan -ea tridents#a creosote bush 1.5 Ferocactus wislizenii Baileys multiradiata desert marigold 1.0 ® fishhook barrel cactus Glandularia gooddingii gooding's verbena 1.5 Yucca pallida Psilostrophe cooperi paper flower 1.0 pale lef yucca Sphaeralcea ambigua desert globemallow 1.5 Carnegiea gigantea Aristida purpurea purple three -awn 2.0 saguaro Bouteloua curtipendula side -oats grama 1.5 Lophocereus schoti Bouteloua rothrockii rothrock grama g 1.0 .• totem pole cactus Sporobplus cryptandrus sand dropseed Escholtzia 1.0 1.5 Peniocereus greggii mexicana mexican poppy gold night blooming cereus Kalistroemia grandoflora arizona poppy 1.5 Ground Covers / Vines Penstemon panyi parry penstemon 1.0 ® Lantana montevidensis Sphaeralcea coulteri globemallow 1.0 yellow trailing /antana NPP MITIGATION Trees Required(TOS) Provided Blue Palo Verde 2 2 Foothill Palo Verde 40 40 Velvet Mesquite 11 11 Under -story plants 265 265 Berlandiera lyrata chocolate flower Cacti Required(TOS) Provided Saguaro 12 12 Barrel Cactus 63 63 Ocotillo 3 3 Under -story plants 60 60 REF. CASE OV12-92-09, OV12-05-05, OV1502124 n T salvage 1 ,t 15 gallon 4 L OCA TiOI � UAP A PORTION OF SECTION 24, T-12-S, R-13-E 36" box 11 GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, CITY OF ORO VALLEY, - PWA COUNTY, ARIZONA SCALE: 3"=1 MILE salvage 1 24" box 6 LINE LEGEND 24" box 13 PROPOSED CONTOURS 24" box 11 EXISTING CONTOURS - - - - - -- RIGHT-OF-WAY 15 gallon 3 PROPERTY LINE ROADWAY CENTERLINE 100 YR FLOODPLAIN LINE PROPOSED WATER Size Qty �' ; .. . PROPOSED SEWER �' 5 gallon 14 Q o NEW RIP RAP 5 gallon 8 q/ NEW SIGN 5 gallon 55 - - --/ - - - EXISTING EASEMENT .............: EXISTING GAS 5 gallon 16 -- :}- - ,`- -- EXISTING WATER 5 gallon 36 1WI EXISTING WATER METER 5 gallon 23 ` EXISTING WATER VALVE -S - -- _ - EXISTING SEWER 5 gallon 41 EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE 5 gallon 1 EXISTING PAVEMENT EDGE a ' EXISTING CONCRETE 5 gallon 5 EXISTING CURB 5 gallon 12 ------------- EROSION HAZARD SETBACK 5 gallon 55 .LANDSCAPE KEYNOTES 1. Property line 5 gallon 29 2• Pavement - refer to civil 3. Concrete sidewalk - refer to civil 5 gallon 3 4. Concrete curb - refer to civil 5. Pavers - refer to civil 5 gallon 22 6. Decorative rock typ. in all landscape areas 7. Stabilized decorative rock salvage 2 8. Hydro -seed desert mix 15 gallon 14 9• Steps - refer to civil 5 gallon 12 10. Existing wall 11. Existing fence 12. Existing pavement 5 gallon 67 13. Existing decorative rock shall remain, contractor shall top dress as necessary 5 gallon 55 14. Decorative masonry wall - refer to architect 15. Riparian habitat'C' 5 gallon 80 16. 15' riparian clear zone 17. 100 year flood limit 5 gallon 54 18. Limit of clearing 19. Bollard - refer to civil salvage 27 20. 21. Steel edge Fire pit - refer to architect 5 gallon 38 22. Limit of decorative rock/desert seed 5 gallon 102 .23. Erosion hazard setback 24. 15' public water esmt. dkt. 13149, pg 5 salvage 13 25. 15' public water esmt. dkt. 12257, pg 1114 6' spear 2 26. 15' public water esmt. dkt. 13149, pg 8 15 clallon 8 salvage 1 Size Qty 1 gallon 30 1 gallon 193 PERM! T SET SHEET INDEX 1. Landscape site plan 2. Landscape plan 3. Landscape plan 4. Landscape details OWNER Canyon Del Oro Baptist Church 9200 N. Oracle Road Tucson, Arizona 85704 (520) 297-3900 Contact: Pastor Steve Vankley svankley@cdobaptist.org ARC 150921 LANDSCAPE LEGEND Scale - 1 "= 20' CI = 1' Furnish and install landscape material per plans, rV 1 ti _ `18 6 details and specifications. All plant material to I f�'{� 0 10' 20' 40' 60' meet ANA specifications and be of sound health 140 I '`f I X I , and appearance. Landscape Architect to hand - select and tag all trees for project. HARDSCAPE/ GROUND COVER MATERIALS LEGEND Trees J 1 � � � � r ,.``°" `.--.• ._ �, i �� �1 \ � � � � `- i �X 1 � Size Qty, .' � Furnish and install all material per plans, details, and specs. Prosopis velutina salvage 4 -' • = - Concrete plaza and sidewalks •' QV velvet mesquite 24" box 18 . concrete sidewalk - 4" over 6" ab, refer to J ,. ♦ ♦ • ♦ • • .- ,i c 11 i 4; •r . • ♦ .� . \ , specifications. Parkinsonia i ro t- m c phylla salvage 27 Decorative rock r ~ 4 �, ,,`, '•• ____ j •� / foothill paloverde 36" box 4 --- �� 1 ( , t i 1 /2" screened rock - 2" depth in all landscape 48" box 4- areas - pioneer materials - santa fe brown 1 F, ' s Olne a tesota 48" box 2 1 5 -- _�_-_ �..:. .--- Decorative rock path - �` -- = s'= -' ironwood native resources supply) contract sale. x -T ®- `�\ _, - -- 4 5 _ .__ .� _-_._ g,. -_ 1/4 minus stabilized - 2 depth - pioneer PAY) i --- r �° i --- _-- \ --- materials - santa fe old > ` 9Hydro-seed - mix 1 0 Chilopsis linearis'Bubba' salvage 1 f `� ! � ��--30,� -�f a4' _p- % 22 Ibs ure live seed - referto s ecs.semi-seedless desert willow 15 gallon 4 h dro seed mix - 1 Botanical Name Common Name Ibslac Pistacia x 'Red Push' O 36" box 11 ' Ambrosia deltoldea triangle -leaf bursage 2.0 red push pistache ' , __ _ - -. t'; • , ♦ ' • f Calliandra eriophylla fairy duster 1.5 /j r �`//'-' ` • Celtis pallida desert hackberry 1.5 Parkinsonia florida salvage 1 1 / ` 4.>_ ' Larrea tridentata creosote bush 1.5 blue paloverde 24 box 6 g , ` ` • s •� i Baileya multiradiata desert marigold 1.0 ` . `i• • G a du aria gooddingii goodin s verbena 1.5 „ `'1 ` /� \ •� . ; / • •: g Prosopis grand Thornless 24 box 13 -- \ y `� •� o Psilostrophe cooper) paper flower 1.0 thornless texas hone mesquite Sphaeralcea ambigua desert globemallow 1.5 \ '� .{` / •, _ Arlstlda purpurea purple three -awn 2.0 Bouteloua curtipendula side -oats grama 1.5 Se Nora secundiflora 24" box 11 / / --- 12 / • ` O ` , a ` \ 24 4 Bouteloua rothrockii rothrock grama 1.0 texas mountain laurel x 1 / % •-� -�-=}�'�- �,. , S orob lus c tandrus sand dro seed 1.0 -'�- ` ;: p p ryp p Cercis canadensis'oklahoma' 15 gallon 3 18 j 4 - O _. :� Escholtzla mexlcana mexican poppy gold 1.5 + \ - > %�. / /�'�. �. ,. , t .:r. a Kall r mia gr T redbud oklahoma I x ; / / �` �. :,,�: ;... .�: st oe andoflora arizona poppy 1.5 ,l Penstemon ar i a o � .�i ` p rY party Penstemon 1.0 � / ��=�� � � -- �- -. Sphaeralcea coulteri glo / Existing 1 / � _ _ � •V -• - bemallow 1.0 x 1 tree � x 1�.. �_-� / � �' � � �� � ` ' • • � - � Shrubs /Succulents Size Q ty / Bauhinia lunariodes'White'5 gallon 14 8 chihuahuan orchid shrub x ;' '=ram_,`; ` =� i /EXISTING • ,� • + Dodonea viscosa 5 gallon 8 GLAtSSROOMS • =� .,� hop seed _ M Simmondsia chinensis 5 gallon 55 / r p-._�.. ,�' , / AND OFFICE t- O jojoba - FFE: 2660.5 Salvia clevelandii 5 gallon 16 / _ ..::.i AREA: 3697 SF / _ - �. c eveland sage x / EXISTING- -�/ w Ruellia brittoniana 5 gallon 36 CLASSROOMS w ba a mexican barrio ruellia r to 1 FFE: 2660.5 ' w Justicia californica 5 gallon 23 AREA: 4181 SF chuparosa J Viguiera parishii (Deltoidea) 5 gallon 41 1-- goldeneye O Dalea frutescens 5 gallon 1 6 C4 black dalea r Salvia greggii 5 gallon 5 .` �r% autumn sage . . b / j' '/ << 1 o Bouteloua gracllls 5 gallon 12 z; f v,• v { ,� �t/ blue grama ,� 1' " :'fix `' 14 ndra californica 5 gallon 55 , _ . .baja fairy duster j _ ,• ;;. ;. h ' Celtis pallida 5 gallon 29 EXISTING "'` >;. desert hackberry N I - • ::. 14 Acacia constr •� I � pI � - SANCTUARY `f' .�.F �.�:'� � �; .. icta �;• ....,:: 5 gallon 3 FFE: 2660.5 �.� .. ., .: 3 whiteth rn ` ��.•� o acacia ` 5 gallon 22 AREA: 5448 SF _ ti � Acacia greggii \ f catclaw acacia Fouquieria splendens salvage 2 -_ ocotillo 23 15 gallon 14 - _ - 1 Asc{epias subulata 5 gallon 12 L �..` desert milkweed x .- �� 3 _ �_ = Euphorbia antisyphilitica 5 gallon 67 - - �; ; LANDSCAPE KEY NOTES ® candelilla b 3 1'r KITCHEN � - t�=�-,`:� - _�_---2fi�� _ ,r Das firion wheeleri 5 gallon 55 �l � �' �� -� � ..�-• � r X ` � � � AREA: F ` - � = -` _=_ _ 1. Property line Y z 2. Pavement -refer to civil desert spoon t..•. _. ..l .- _ -•1 1 '� 3. Concrete sidewalk - refer to civil Hesperaloe parviflora 5 gallon 80 'ALI- �; �. - 4. Concrete curb - refer to civil brakelights yucca / _ I s:, = 5. Pavers - refer to civil Hesperaloe nocturna 5 gallon 54 16 x 5 i ;- �:,. 13 i O .R r '= === 6. Decorative rock typ. in all landscape areas nightblooming hespera/oe i �< �+ z _ 7. Stabilized decorative rock ® Ferocactus wislizenii salvage 27 li 4: f h �i r� t �"� fishhook barrel cactus 5 gallon 38 „�=4,:..r>• � �= $. Hydro -seed desert mix 9. Steps - refer to civil Yucca pallida 10. Existing wall � 5 gallon 102 f 11. Existing fence pale /ef yucca Carne iea i antea salvage 13 12. Existing pavement � 9 9 9 g � �' f X / i • it _ :, . � -_ �'❑ o ' saguaro 6' spear 2 13. Existing decorative rock shall remain, i .115' contractor shall top dress as necessary , Lophocereus schoti 15 gallon 8 m j x / r _ 14. Decorative masonry wall - refer to architect totem pole cactus x -�- �' Z 15. Riparian habitat'C' Peniocereus greggii salvage 1 `-N. -� 16. 15' riparian clear zone night blooming cereus o s > �' ,' / -- r ,,' ~- / x ! r, j l x �; 16 17. 100 year flood limit Ground Covers / Vines Size Qty 2 j 18. Limit of clearing o ' x / - / �y 1 -� -- , �' 15 g Lantana montevidensis 1 gallon 30 / ( _- /� 20. Steel19. redge#er to civil ® yellow trailing /antana Berlandiera lyrata 1 gallon 193 'x _ i x `� - y - - 21. Fire pit - refer to architect Q x 1 -�' /' - 22. Limit of decorative rock/desert seed chocolate flower 23. Erosion hazard setback x 24. 15' public water esmt. dkt. 13149, pg 5 25. 15' public water esmt. dkt. 12257, pg 1114 26. 15' public water esmt. dkt. 13149, pg 8 LANDSCAPE PLAN REF. CASE 002-92-09, OV12-05-05, OV1502124 PERMIT SET ARC 15092 Scale: 1" = 20' LANDSCAPE PLAN a 2 U, ARC STUDIOS �p 4�,rtca F AF CANYON DEL ORO BAPTIST CHURCH v ATMHSCOMPANY �Q- v4. 'dp 9p PHASE 3.• NEW SANCTUARY OF cr 3117 E. Flower Street 39813 IRREGULAR PARCEL BEING A PORTION OF S. 545' Or LOT 2 Tucson, AZ 85716 5 ERIC R. , ALSO BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 24, T 12 S, R 13 E, C&SRM, 4 phone 520.882.9655 a 13ARRETT � TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA I Tyro waking days before you dig, AS NOTED cArL FOR THE BLUE sralcEs www.arestudiosinc.com fed! DRWN BY DJR ERB 08 1 O 16 APPD BY 20 REF SCALE 1100-782-534 lands a archi ture .urban design . DSCN BY Bluee Stake ERB OS 10 16 O Stake Center STAKE- T environme ervices . irrigation design APPD BY 20 - PLAN N 0. y �DD�O ` O NO. DATE REVISION BY CH APPR EXPIRES 9/30I2018 CHKD 8Y ERB 08 10 16 4 Ll LANDSCAPE PLAN ----------------- �\♦�N. • J \ - �7 O x 18 Scale: 1" = 20' Scale - 1"= 20' CI = l' 0 10' 20' 40' 60' LANDSCAPE KEY NOTES 1. Property line 2. Pavement - refer to civil 3. Concrete sidewalk - refer to civil 4. Concrete curb - refer to civil 5. Pavers - refer to civil 6. Decorative rock typ. in all landscape areas 7. Stabilized decorative rock 8. Hydro -seed desert mix 9. Steps - refer to civil 10. Existing wall 11. Existing fence 12. Existing pavement 13. Existing decorative rock shall remain, contractor shall top dress as necessary 14. Decorative masonry wall - refer to architect 15. Riparian habitat'C' 16. 15' riparian clear zone 17. 100 year flood limit 18. Limit of clearing 19. Bollard - refer to civil 20. Steel edge 21. Fire pit - refer to architect 22. Limit of decorative rock/desert seed 23. Erosion hazard setback 24. 15' public water esmt. dkt. 13149, pg 5 25. 15' public water esmt. dkt. 12257, pg 1114 26. 15' public water esmt. dkt. 13149, pg 8 HARDSCAPE/ GROUND COVER MATERIALS LEGEND Furnish and install all material per plans, details, and specs. Concrete plaza and sidewalks concrete sidewalk - 4" over 6" ab, refer to specifications. Decorative rock 1/2" screened rock - 2" depth in all landscape areas - pioneer materials - santa fe brown Decorative rock path 1/4" minus stabilized - 2" depth - pioneer materials - santa fe gold Hydro -seed - mix 1 22 Ibs pure live seed - refer to specs. hydro seed mix-1 Botanical Name Common Name Ibs/ac Ambrosia deltoidea triangle -leaf bursage 2.0 Calliandra eriophylla fairy duster 1.5 Celtis pallida desert hackberry 1.5 Larrea tridentata creosote bush 1.5 Baileya multiradiata desert marigold 1.0 Glandularia gooddingii gooding's verbena 1.5 Psilostrophe cooped paper flower 1.0 Sphaeralcea ambigua desert globemallow 1.5 Aristida purpurea purple three -awn 2.0 Bouteloua curtipendula side -oats grama 1.5 Bouteloua rothrockii rothrock grama 1.0 Sporobplus cryptandrus sand dropseed 1.0 Escholtzia mexicana mexican poppy gold 1.5 Kallstroemia grandoflora arizona poppy 1.5 Penstemon parryi parry penstemon 1.0 Sphaeralcea coulteri globemallow 1.0 REF. CASE 002-92-09, O02-05-05, OV1502124 LANDSCAPE LEGEND Furnish and install landscape material per plans, details and specifications. All plant material to meet ANA specifications and be of sound health and appearance. Landscape Architect to hand select and tag all trees for project. Trees Size Qty Prosopis velutina salvage 4 velvet mesquite 24" box 18 Parkinsonia microphylla salvage 27 foothill paloverde 36" box 4 48" box 4 Olneya tesota 48" box 2 ironwood (native resources supply) contract salv. Chilopsis linearis 'BubbW semi -seedless desert willow Pistacia x 'Red Push' O red push pistache Parkinsonia florida blue paloverde Prosopis grandulosa 'Thornless' thornless texas honey mesquite Sophora secundiflora texas mountain laurel i Gercls canadensis 'oklahoma' redbud oklahoma / x } Existing tree 1 Shrubs / Succulents Bauhinia lunariodes 'White' chihuahuan orchid shrub + Dodonea viscosa hop seed Simmondsia chinensis jojoba m Salvia clevelandii (J cleve/and sage Ruellia brittoniana Baja mexican barrio ruellia Justicia californica chuparosa Viguiera parishii (Deltoidea) goldeneye O Dalea frutescens black da/ea O Salvia greggii autumn sage o Bouteloua gracilis blue grams ® Calliandra californica baja fairy duster Celtis pallida desert hackberry Acacia constricta whitethorn acacia Acacia greggii catclaw acacia Fouquieria splendens ocotillo Asclepias subulata desert milkweed Euphorbia antisyphilitica candelilla Dasylirion wheeleri desert spoon Hesperaloe parviflora brakelights yucca Hesperaloe nocturna nightblooming hespera/oe Ferocactus wislizenii fishhook barrel cactus Yucca pallida pale lef yucca ® Carnegiea gigantea saguaro Lophocereus schoti totem pole cactus Peniocereus greggii night blooming cereus Ground Covers / Vines ® Lantana montevidensis yellow trailing Lantana O Berlandiera lyrata chocolate flower PERMIT SET salvage 1 15 gallon 4 36" box 111 salvage 1 24" box 6 24" box 131 24" box 111 15 gallon 3 1 Size Qty 5 gallon 14 5 gallon 8 5 gallon 55 5 gallon 16 5 gallon 36 5 gallon 23 5 gallon 41 5 gallon 1 5 gallon 5 5 gallon 12 5 gallon 55 5 gallon 29 1 5 gallon 3 5 gallon 22 salvage 2 15 gallon 14 5 gallon 12 5 gallon 67 5 gallon 55. 5 gallon 80 5 gallon 54 salvage 27 5 gallon 38 5 gallon 102 salvage 13 6' spear 2 15 gallon 8 salvage 1 Size Qty 1 gallon 30 1 gallon 193 ARC 350921 1/2" RUBBER HOSE W/ #10 _ WIRE RUBBER COATED 3" ROUND TREATED LODGE POLE PINE STAKES, BURY T BELOW / GRADE (SIZE STAKE TO TREE) TRIM WIRE ENDS AND TAPE -FINISHI GRADE, REFER TO PLAN FOR MATERIAL CENTURY ROOT BARRIER - CP SERIES ROOT BARRIER PANELS TI-1I CP36-2 OR EQUIVALENT BLENDED SOIL REFER TO SPECS. TV --UNDISTURBED SOIL, TYP. -!;; ;;ll-il x BORE 4" DIA. X 36" DEEP HOLE IN NOTES: UNDISTURBED SOIL AND FILL W/ 1. DIMENSION "X" EQUALS TWO (2) TIMES THE BOX 3/8" PEA GRAVEL OR CRUSHED WIDTH, DEPTH OF PIT WILL EQUAL DEPTH OF ROCK, IN HARDPAN (CALICHE ROOTBALL. SOILS) DEPTH OF HOLE SHALL 2. SCARIFY SIDES & BOTTOM OF PIT, & BORE HOLES EXTEND THROUGH HARDPAN ON ALL PITS, AND WILL VARY WITH DEPTH OF 3. SET CROWN OF ROOTBALL 1/2" TO 1" ABOVE FINISH HARDPAN. GRADE TO ALLOW FOR SETTLEMENT. 4, DO NOT COVER CROWN WITH SOIL, 5. ROOT GUARDS SHALL BE PROVIDED ON ALL SIDES WHERE HARDSCAPE IS ADJACENT TO PLANT. 6. REFER TO TREE GUYING DETAIL FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 15 GALLON & 241 N BOX - TREE PLANTI NG SINGLE TRUNK MIN. 6"-8" MULTI -TRUNK TREE STAKING 1" 2" NTS TREE TRUNK TREE STAKES, 3" 0 x 8' 12 GA. GALVANIZED AND COATED WIRE 1/2" I.D. RUBBER HOSE LOOPED W/ WIRE NTS HARDSCAPE EDGE - SIDEWALK, CURB OR OTHER (REFER TO ALL PLANS FOR EDGE MATERIAL) FINAL GRADE - GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL ALLOW 2" FOR DECORATIVE ROCK DECORATIVE ROCK SCARIFIED GRADE 6" MIN. -COMPACTED SUB GRADE, TYP. FINAL GRADE HARDSCAPE TO DEC. ROCK NOTES. 1. DO NOT USE IN RIGHT OF WAY. STEEL EDGING NTS STABILIZED CRUSHED STONE SURFACE REFER TO PLAN FOR FINISH GRADE HEIGHT, 2" MIN. - 6" MAX. FINISH GRADE DECORATIVE ROCK 1A"x8" STEEL PLATE EDGING, WELD AT JOINTS AND CORNERS (NOTIFY IF DEPTH OF MATERIAL TO BE RETAINED IS GREATER THAN 3") #4 REBAR WELD TO STEEL EDGE 4' O.C., 4" FROM EDGES AND CORNERS COMPACTED SUB GRADE, TYP. NTS -FINISH GRADE, REFER TO PLAN FOR MATERIAL SCARIFY SOIL, MIN. 6" TO FINISH GRADE --BLENDED SOIL REFER TO SPECS. UNDISTURBED SOIL, TYP. -BORE 4" DIA. X 36" DEEP HOLE IN �I II UNDISTURBED SOIL AND FILL W/ 3/8" PEA GRAVEL OR CRUSHED _! I TI=1T!=1 I I 1=1 I ICI - -► i III ROCK, IN HARDPAN (CALICHE :I II I I-f I I-1 I SOILS) DEPTH OF HOLE SHALL EXTEND THROUGH HARDPAN AND WILL VARY WITH DEPTH OF (I fl I I I 1=1 NOTES: HARDPAN. rx, 1 , DIMENSION "X" EQUALS FOUR (4) TIMES THE BOX WIDTH, DEPTH OF PIT WILL EQUAL DEPTH OF ROOTBALL. 2. SCARIFY SIDES & BOTTOM OF PIT, & BORE HOLES ON ALL PITS, 3. SET CROWN OF ROOTBALL 1/2" TO 1" ABOVE FINISH GRADE TO ALLOW FOR SETTLEMENT. 4. DO NOT COVER CROWN WITH SOIL, 361N BOX OR LARGER - TREE PLANTING 7 CACTUS PLANTING 20'-0" O.C. il 4'-0" L 'DEPRESSED BASIN SH GRADE, REFER TO N FOR MATERIAL )TBALL KFILL MIX REFER TO SPECS. IISTURBED SOIL, TYP. ,RIFY SOIL TO PROVIDE ,INAGE NOTES: 1. SET CROWN OF ROOTBALL 1/2" TO 1" ABOVE FINISH GRADE TO ALLOW FOR SETTLEMENT. 2. DO NOT COVER CROWN WITH SOIL. 3. SETTLE BACKFILL BY WATERING, AND COMPACT TO REMOVE AIR POCKETS, SHRUB PLANTING NTS NTS SAGUARO (� ---CARPET TO PREVENT SAGUARO DAMAGE ITER POST ENDS FOR EVEN CONTACT ( 3/4" STEEL BOX BANDING -NOTCH POSTS AS SHOWN TO PREVENT BAND SLIPPING I GRADE, REFER TO 4" x 4" POST (4) SPACED :OR MATERIAL EQUALLY -HEIGHT AS REQUIRED TO PREVENT LEANING ZONE FINISH GRADE SLOPE AWAY _ E SOIL BACKFILL, FROM SAGUARO BASE = I� III III1 I I � To SPECS. III1 I I l I I_ ACTED SUB GRADE, -I I I I I i I -I 11-� II -I i I -I NOTES: 1. DUST ALL ROOT ENDS WITH SOIL SULFUR. 2. CONTRACTOR TO USE ONLY SAGUAROS ORIENTED WITH TRUE NORTH & SOUTH LOCATED IN HOLE WITH USE OF COMPASS. 3. BACKFILL TO BE NATIVE SOIL TREATED WITH SOIL SULFUR, HAND TAMPED FIRMLY INTO PLACE. 4. ALL ROOTS SHALL BE PRUNED AT 900 . 8 SAGUARO PLANTING NTS NTS �--- REFER TO PLANMID IMDTH FINISH GRADE -III=III _ I YELLOW NYLON �-i I =rl. �' - 4" MIN. THICK ROPE =III �l I-111=111=111-iI`1 1-1 11=111-11(S„I '=1 I I=11 -1 II ii ,- _i I I I I I f- I l l i l DECOMPOSED I=1 I I -III I=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 I FI 11=i I I=1I I=1 I I=I 11-I 11=1 11=i 11=1 I GRANITE PATH RED FLAGGING =1 i{-I f-1 11=1 11=I 11=1 11=1 11=i 11=1 11=1_I1=1_i 1=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11= I-1 4' 0. C.=1Ti=! I !=iTi=iT! i !_! I 1=1Ti=1 !-I i I-i i !-i ! !=1 i !=i I !=!T!=! - COMPACTED SUB 6' T POST NOTES: GRADE, TYP. 1. STABILIZED DG TO BE PREMIXED OFF SITE. 2, TOTAL DEPTH TO BE 4" MIN. AND COMPACTED IN TWO, 2" LIFTS. FINISH GRADE COMPACTED SUB GRADE, TYP. PROTECTIVE CLEARING LIMIT FENCE Two Working days before you dig, CALL FOR THE BLUE STAKES 1-800-782-50M 1-800-STAKE-IT Blue Stake Center NTS STABILIZED DECOMPOSED GRANITE PATH environ ARC STUDIOS A TIVHS COMPANY 3117 E. Flower Street Tucson, AZ 85716 phone 520-882.9655 www.arcstudiosinc.com Aure . urban design . ices . irrigation design 12 NOTES: 1. SET CROWN OF ROOTBALL 1/2" TO 1" ABOVE FINISH GRADE TO ALLOW FOR SETTLEMENT. 2, DO NOT COVER CROWN WITH SOIL. 3. SETTLE BACKFILL SOIL BY WATERING, AND COMPACT TO REMOVE AIR POCKETS. ACCENT PLANTING GRADE, REFER TO OR MATERIAL ILL PLANT PIT W/ DRY SOIL TURBED SOIL, TYP. SION "X" EQUALS TWO (2) TIMES THE CONTAINER, DEPTH OF PIT WILL EQUAL CONTAINER, SCARIFY SIDES & BOTTOM OF PIT NTS AVERAGE OF 75% OF THE TALLER CANES C/) w z _ o a _-----PLACE EMITTER TUBING 2' AWAY FROM BASE OF PLANT w r- LU Z co a 2" DEPRESSED BASIN REFER TO PLAN FOR FINISH MATERIAL N" BACKFILL WITH DRY SITE SOIL, REFER TO SPECS. COMPACTED SUB GRADE, TYP. `X' -------------- ;I NOTES: 1. DIMENSION "X" EQUALS TWO (2) TIMES THE BOX WIDTH, DEPTH OF PIT WILL EQUAL DEPTH OF ROOTBALL. 2. SCARIFY SIDES & BOTTOM OF PIT, & BORE HOLES ON ALL PITS. 3. SET CROWN OF ROOTBALL 1/2" TO 1" ABOVE FINISH GRADE TO ALLOW FOR SETTLEMENT. 4. DO NOT COVER CROWN WITH SOIL. n(`_f)Tll I n pl A KITI nl(, - 9AIKI POY NTS GENERAL LANDSCAPING NOTES: 1. The Landscape Architect, or his representative, reserve the right to refuse any plant materials he deems unacceptable. (see specifications) 2. For clarification of discrepancies between the drawings and the site, it should be brought to the attention of the Landscape Architect prior to beginning work. 3. The Landscape Architect is to approve any and all substitutions. 4. Plant list quantities provided for contractor's convenience only. Plans take precedence. 5. Exposed soil in planters shall be raked and free from rocks, roots, weeds, etc. 6. Finished grade in decorative rock areas shall be 1" below adjacent header board, paving, curbing, etc. 7. Plants shall be quality material having a growth habit that is normal for the species and be sound, vigorous, healthy, and free from insects and injury. 8. Ground cover and/or decorative rock shall extend under shrubs unless noted. 9. After all work is completed, the contractor shall remove all materials not incorporated in the scope of work from the job site. 10. Grading shall include all excavation, settlement, handling, import, distribution, transportation, and disposal necessary to bring ground to finish grade as shown on the civil and landscape plans. 11. All earthwork is to be done so that all water drains away from all structures. 12. All underground conduits are to be located before digging. If doubt exists call blue stakes. 13. All plant material to be guaranteed for a period of one (1) year after final acceptance. 14. Landscape contractor is responsible for moving, rough grade, and final grading on all landscaped areas. 15. In the event of major discrepancies between the plans and field conditions, contractor shall notify the Landscape Architect immediately. Allow a minimum of forty-eight (48) hours between notification of Landscape Architect and proceeding with construction of irrigation system. 16. All existing trees and landscape to remain shall be protected and watered during all phases of construction. If any tree should die from damage or neglect, it shall be replaced with a like species and size at no additional cost to owner. 17. Test drainage of plant beds and pits by filling with water. Conditions permitting the retention of water in locations for more than twenty-four (24) hours shall be brought to the attention of the Landscape Architect prior to any planting. 18. Contractor is responsible for providing sleeves to all landscape areas regardless whether they are shown on plans or not. Refer to sleeving schedule for size and quantity. If doubt or discrepancy exists request clarification from Landscape Architect in writing. 19. All landscape areas shall be depressed 6 inches to maximize storm water harvesting. 20. Final plant locations must be in compliance with all utility setback requirements. 21. Sleeve all pipes and wires under paved areas including streets and sidewalks. 22. Irrigation lines are shown schematically; locate all line in unpaved areas. 23, Locate all lines within the property line when possible. 24. The general contractor (gc) takes full liability for this landscape and irrigation, and any damage to roadway, sidewalk and utilities. 25. The Landscape and irrigation shall be installed per the associated specifications. 26, All site contouring and finish grading shall be completed and accepted by the landscape contractor and Landscape Architect prior to start of irrigation. 27. Area square footages are for agency review and use only, not for contractor take -offs or quantity use. 28. Vegetation within the sight visibility triangle shall not interfere with the visibility plane described by one horizontal line located 30" above finished grade or roadway surface. 29. It is the owners responsibility to keep the sight visibility triangles (svt), and the pedestrian access area clear of vegetation at all times, per land use code (luc) section. 30. The owner understands that if the Town of Oro Valley transportation department or any utility company needs to work within the row in the landscaped area, plants and irrigation may be destroyed without replacement or repair. 31, The owner takes full liability for this landscape and irrigation, and any damage to roadway, sidewalk and utilities. 32. The only private irrigation equipment that is allowed within the row are lateral lines, tubing and emitters that are not under constant pressure. All other equipment must be on private property (excluding water meter). 33, The property owner shall replace dead or missing vegetation within 14 days to ensure full compliance with approved landscape plans. 34. Trees that have been topped or lion -tailed shall be replaced with a tree of value equal to that of the tree prior to the improper pruning. REF. CASE OV12-92-09, 002-05-05, OV1502124 PERMIT SST LANDSCAPE PLAN o FOR \V,CAT q °F CANYON DEL ORO BAPTIST CHURCH Ftio 9� PHASE 3: NEW SANCTUARY ✓n 39813 x IRREGULAR PARCEL BEING A PORTION OF S. 545' OF LOT 2 ERIC R. ALSO BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 24, T 12 S, R 13 E, G&SRM, or BARRETT TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA a �O s; 08/16 Y JRERB 08101-_ REF ed. DRWN BAPPID BY 0 -_- DSCN BY ERB 08 10 16 NO. DATE REVISION BY CH APPR EXPIRES 9/30/2018 CHKD BY ERB 08 "10 16 APPD BY -- 20 PLAN NO. ARC 15092 4 OF 4 SCALE AS NOTED OV1600907 0 0 N 0 b 0 cc N i 0) 0 0 z 0 U ct 4 m 0 ct 0 0 z 0 N 0 i 0 U N a 0 Q q a> 0 EMITTER SCHEDULE Trees Type Outlets Gph Gph outlet plant Prosopis velutina m 5 2.0 10.0 velvet mesquite Parkinsonia microphylla m 3 2.0 6.0 foothill paloverde Olneya tesota m 5 2.0 10.0 ironwood Chilopsis linearis 'Bubba' m 5 2.0 10.0 semi -seedless desert willow Pistacia x 'Red Push' m 6 2.0 12.0 red push pistache Parkinsonia florida m 5 2.0 10.0 blue paloverde Prosopis grand ulosa 'Thornless' m 5 2.0 10.0 thornless texas honey mesquite Sophora secundiflora m 4 2.0 8.0 texas mountain laurel Cercis canadensis 'oklahoma' m 4 2.0 8.0 redbud oklahoma Shrubs / Succulents Type Outlets Gph Gph outlet plant Bauhinia lunariodes 'White' s/m 3 2.0 6.0 chihuahuan orchid shrub Dodonea viscosa s/m 2 2.0 4.0 hop seed Simmondsia chinensis s/m 2 2.0 4.0 jojoba Salvia clevelandii s/m 2 1.0 2.0 Cleveland sage Ruellia brittoniana s/rn 1 1.0 1.0 baja mexican barrio ruellia Justicia californica s/m 2 1.0 2.0 chuparosa Viguiera parishii (Deltoidea) s/m 2 1.0 2.0 goldeneye Dalea frutescens s/m 2 1.0 2.0 black dalea Salvia greggii s/m 1 1.0 1.0 autumn sage Bouteloua gracilis s/m 1 1.0 1.0 blue grama Calliandra californica s/m 2 1.0 2.0 baja fairy duster Celtis pallida s/m 2 2.0 4.0 desert hackberry Acacia constricta s/m 2 2.0 4.0 whitethorn acacia Acacia greggii s/m 2 2.0 4.0 catclaw acacia Fouquieria splendens s/m 1 0.5 0.5 ocotillo Asclepias subulata s/m 2 1.0 2.0 desert milkweed Euphorbia antisyphilitica s/m 1 1.0 1.0 candelilla Dasylirion wheeled s/m 2 2.0 4.0 desert spoon Hesperaloe parviflora s/m 1 1.0 1.0 brakelights yucca Hesperaloe nocturna s/m 2 1.0 2.0 nightblooming hesperaloe Ferocactus wislizenii s/m 0 0.0 0.0 fishhook barrel cactus Yucca pallida s/m 1 1.0 1.0 pale lef yucca Carnegiea gigantea s/m 0 0.0 0.0 saguaro Lophocereus schoti s/m 1 1.0 1.0 totem pole cactus Peniocereus greggii slm 1 0.5 0.5 night blooming cereus Ground Covers / Vines Type Outlets Gph Gph outlet plant Lantana montevidensis s/m 1 1.0 1.0 yellow trailing lantana Berlandiera lyrata s/m 1 0.5 0.5 chocolate flower IRRIGATION SITE PLAN APPROVED BY: i TP I ONI ADMINISTRAOR -DATE FINAL IRRIGATION PLAN for CANYON DEL ORO BAPTIST CHURCH PHASE 3: NEW SANCTUARY OV1600907 IRRIGATION LEGEND furnish and install all material per plans, details, and specifications irrigation source / point of connection - irrigation meter - 5/8" (refer to civil water plans) N reduced pressure backflow preventer - watts u009 - 3/4" w/ enclosure _ irrigation mainline - sch. 40 pvc 1-1 /2" w/ sch. 80 fittings, 2hr pressure test at 150 psi ® irrigation controller - rain master twice 2-wire, 36 station, tw-eg36 - wall mounted controller ®master valve and flow sensor: master valve - superior 3100 n.o. - 1"; flow sensor - cst fsi-t series - 1" �H�s PROJP-( -q -I isolation valve - 1-1/2" lead free brass ball valve ` 1� remote control valve & filter - valve - irritrol 700 series, -� --- ` ,� 700-1 filter -rain bird rby-100-150rnx /400 . '17, � '� irrigation sleeve -class 200 pvc - 4" mainlines and multiple 3{ z �; V 0s "� L �-- ` ��' \\ J /// ,`I- ''. " g g LOCH i!0►�j jSAP � � r � ��\ t f �. t lines 2 single line and controller wiring 'Y 1Y► / I ,rl�� t %� tree line - sch. 40 pvc - 3/4 unless otherwise shown SHEET 3 � ;' a I' tD u I ��t A PORTION OF SECT/ON 24, T-12-S, R-13-E �",�'I, : „ CILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, -� \\N -��� s ; ! I t shrub line - sch. 40 pvc - 3/4 unless otherwise shown L ti� = -'�=�, -' f \�l - - - CITY OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA hose end cap SCALE: 3 =1 MILE �\ E >"( - a� �.� 8Q!f4 T2� (�M - f , �, _�, S �- pressure regulator - senniger - pmr-30-mf 7T7N , - 111i17_A,,kSV *, . --\ I1 -� �� / �- LINE LEGEND f BK 14, PG 93 multi -outlet xeri-bug emitters rain bird - (6) lgph and 2 gph ports - refer to emitter schedule NOT single -port emitters - install rain bird xeri-bug xbt-10 and SHOWN xbt-20 - refer to emitter schedule -- �- ---- -- /f` h. O quick coupler - brass coupling valves ---- -- IRRIGATION VALVE SCHEDULE 'Jl� 1 Valve Size Type Valve Size Type -_ A-1 1�� future A-8 1; shrub A-2 1 shrub A-9 1 tree A-3 1" tree A-10 1" tree W rf LU A-4 1" tree A-11 1" shrub l=, A-5 1" shrub A-12 1" tree A-6 1" tree A-13 1" shrub `o , A-7 1" shrub A-14 1" future ( VALVE SCHEDULE NOTES: z� i f 1. Valve calculation is an estimate, contractor shall provide final valve flow in gallons per minute on as -built plans. '2. (M) multi -port emitter, (s) single -port emitter. Contractor may select to provide multi -port emitters for shrub plant material. ------ W--------- °I, ----------- Base bid - No boxes on trees. Alt. Bid Tree multi -port emitters shall be installed in emitter box per details. 3. Contractor shall adjust controller for the proposed emitter 0 1 schedule and provide watering to promote healthy growth of S plant material for establishment. - 1:� GENERAL IRRIGATION NOTES: Scale: 1" = 100' LANDSCAPE WATER PLAN JAN 134,990 FEB'J MAR I APR I MAY I JUN I JUL AUG I SEP I OCT I NOV DEC I TOTAL at. YEAR 1 Common Areas 44,292 70,396 94,694 119,548 133,155 124,269 107,607 92,750 fi8:,868 41,932 29,991 962,49-2 1000/6 ADWR 766,539 YEAR 2 Common Areas I - 44,292 70,396 94,894 119,548 133,155 124,269 1.07,607 92,750 68,868 41,932 - 897,Sfi1 1 00% ADWR 766,539 YEAR 3 J Common Areas I - I - 70,396 94,694 119,548 133,155 124,2fi9 107,607 92,750 - I - 1- 742.0419 100% ADW!R 766,539 YEAR 4 Common Areas - - 70,396 94,694 119,648 133,155 124,269 - I - I - I - I - 542,062 75% ADWR 574,904 YEARS' CommonAreas - -I - 94,694 119,548 133,155 - 11 - I - - I - I - 347,397 50% ADWWR 3-83,270 .Note: This chart demonstrates how irrigation may be reduced with proper watering techniques andproactive maintenance management. It is the responsibility of the homeowners association and maintenance company to follow the intentions of the irrigation plans and landscape water plan to ensure thatwafiering is adjusted_ After the 5 year period, the -buffer yard irrigation system may be turned off per the code, however to promote growth. during ft dry season (AprO, May, June)weeklyand rnorthlywatering should occurto sustain and confinue to promote plantgrowth. Monthly data will vary depending on the ET data provided. 1. irrigation and/or watering plans shall meet the minimum standards of the American Society of Irrigation Consultants. 2. If desert landscaping is used which will ultimately rely on natural water sources, a temporary drip irrigation system shall be employed until such time as the plant materials are sustained by natural water sources. 3. The property owner is responsible for maintaining the temporary system as long as necessary in order to transition plants over to natural sources. Any plant materials that die in transition, for any reason, shall be replaced in accordance with Sec. 27.6.E.4., Maintenance. 4. Irrigation systems connected to potable water mains (public or private) shall be equipped with backflow preventers. 5. The annual water use for a project shall not exceed the annual landscape water plan. 6. Irrigation meter readings shall be used to determine compliance with the landscape water plan. Non-compliance is subject to penalties under Oro Valley Town Code. 7. Meter readings shall be taken, at a minimum, on an annual basis. Monthly readings may be required, at the discretion of the Planning and Zoning Administrator, in order to address non-compliance with the Water Plan. 8. An initial meter reading shall be taken prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy and recorded for reference as part of the water plan. 9. Irrigation water shall not leave the landscaped areas and flow onto roads, parking areas or sidewalks. 10. Sprinkler heads shall be installed at least eight (8) inches away from impermeable surfaces REF. CASE OV12-92-09, 002-05-05, OV1502124 PROPOSED CONTOURS EXISTING CONTOURS RIGHT-OF-WAY PROPERTY LINE ROADWAY CENTERLINE 100 YR FLO0DPLAIN LINE PROPOSED WATER PROPOSED SEWER NEW RIP RAP NEW SIGN EXISTING EASEMENT EXISTING GAS EXISTING WATER EXISTIN G W ATER M ETER EXISTING WATER VALVE EXISTING SEWER EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE EXISTING PAVEMENT EDGE EXISTING CONCRETE EXISTING CURB IRRIGATION KEY NOTES 1. Property line 2. Right of way line 3. Limit of grading / clearing limits 4. Irrigation source - refer to civil water plans 5. Mater valve and flow sensor 6. Backflow preventer w/ enclosure 7. Irrigation sleeve, typ. 8. Irrigation mainline 9. Irrigation controller 10. Connect valves to existing lateral lines 11. Irrigation mainline stub for future use PERMIT SET SHEET INDEX 1. Irrigation site plan 2. Irrigation plan 3. Irrigation plan 4. Irrigation details OWNER Canyon Del Oro Baptist Church 9200 N. Oracle Road Tucson, Arizona 85704 (520) 297-3900 Contact: Pastor Steve Vankley svankley@cdobaptist.org ARC 150921 Wh Scale`- 1"= 20' CI = l' EMITTER SCHEDULE 3 ,.� 1 _ \ f'' �' i . / Trees Type Outlets Gph Gph 0 10' 20' 40' 60' outlet plant ` Prosopis velutina m 5 2.0 10.0 velvet mesquite IRRIGATION LEGEND Parkinsonia microphylla m 3 2.0 6.0 furnish and install all material per plans, foothill aloverde / p p details, and specifications P JJ r - �- FS irrigation source /point of connection -irrigation meter - 5/8" OlneYa tesota m 5 2.0 10.0 Z (refer to civil water plans) ironwood reduced pressure backflow preventer - watts u009 - 3/4" w/ Chilopsis linearis 'Bubba' m 5 2.0 10.0 f ` ' _ - 7 enclosure semi -seedless desert willow f � •■''i "'�` - - - - ' - `�, l f,� I irri ation mainline - sch. 40 pvc 1-1/2" w/ sch. 80 fittings, Pistacia x 'Red Push' m 6 2.0 12.0 _ - -� 2hr pressure test at 150 psi reed push pistache i irrigation controller - rain master twice 2-wire, 36 station, Parkinsonia florida m 5 2.0 10.0 �, tw-i3 36 -wall mounted controller blue aloverde 'I m f j A-10 �� 8 g Proso p , --- is randu / ',� � � � � � I � ,, I .,• --� � `� � master and flow sensor: master valve -superior 3100 P 9 losa Thornless m 5 2.0 10.0 n.o. - 1 , flow sensor - cst fsi-t series - 1" thornless texas honey mesquite 1 • r r7 isolation valve -1-1 /2" lead free brass ball valve Sophora secundiflora m 4 2.0 8.0 - -` IL texas mountain laurel )J) \ 1 - - remote control valve &filter -valve - irritrol 700 series, Cercis canadensis 'oklahoma' m 4 2.0 8.0 r' 1If r 1 700-1; filter - rain bird rby-100-150mx redbud oklahoma _ irrigation sleeve - class 200 pvc - 4 mainlines and multiple Shrubs / Succulents Type Outlets Gph Gph f ` _ �� lines 2" single line and controller wiring outlet plant i ;� �',ter ��''' tree line -sch. 40 pvc - 3/4" unless otherwise shown Bauhinia lunariodes'White' s/m 3 2.0 6.0 � " l chihuahuan orchid shrub shrub W - "' Dodonea viscosa /m / line sch. 40 pvc - 3/4 unless otherwise shown s 2 2.0 4.0 '2 hop seed 4 r _ __ hose end cap Simmondsia chinensis s/m 2 2.0 4.0 ` jojoba --,� - pressure regulator - senniger - pmr-30-mf Salvia clevelandii s/m 2 1.0 2.0 _�. 7 8� ' cleveland sage 3 multi -outlet xeri-bug emitters rain bird - 6 1 hand 2 h Ruellia brittoniana s/m 1 1.0 1.0 :....§ ports - refer to emitter schedule () gP gP 1 ba'a mexican barrio ruellia Justicia californica +'` ' f' I ,/ !" / - �• ;' 's.. _: NOT single -port emitters - install rain bird xeri-bug xbt-10 and s/m 2 1.0 2.0 . sin .....,. i.. o . SHOWN xbt-20 - refer to emitter schedule parosa quick coupler -brass coupling valve Vi uiera parishii (Deltoidea ) s/m 2 1.0 2.0 ~-- goldeneye f I - IRRIGATION VALVE SCHEDULE Dalea frutescens s/m 2 1.0 2.0 ,• E ,,,-- -. ,, ;, ,�. .r s �„` Valve Size Type Valve Size Type black dalea Salvia re ii r J, s/m 1 1.0 1.0 �,r� / *� ! A-1 1" future A-8 1" shrub 9 gg ' ! I ! / �`�:. `'� A-2 1" shrub A-9 1" tree autumn sage _ t r' �% - r f .� / �LASSROOMS E ISTING •• '�'"': ! `� „ „ ' A-3 1 tree A-10 1 tree Bouteloua gracilis s/m 1 1.0 1.0 P , 'r'� A-4 1" tree A-11 1" shrub 9 _ =. S AND OFFICE c� blue rams °' _ rU ill Calliandra californica s/m 2 1.0 2.0 � f ,FFE:2660.6 1 , A-5 1 shrub A-12 1 tree •• I / = A-6 1" tree A-13 1" shrub baja fairy duster AREA: 3fi97 SF A-7 1" shrub A-14 1" future Celtis pallida s/m 2 2.0 4.0 t VALVE SCHEDULE NOTES: deserthackbery j/`,� -- _ 1 = /� f' �f' E TIN cWn 1. Valve calculation is an estimate, contractor shall provide final Acacia constrieta s/m 2 2.0 4.0 - / CLAS RO S ++ Z valve flow in gallons per minute on as -built plans. whitethorn acacia 2. M m Acacia re ii FF 6 .5 �, ( ) multi -port emitter, (s) single -port emitter. Contractor may 9 99 s/m 2 2.0 4.0 A : 41 SF " v select to provide multi -port emitters for shrub plant material. cafc/aw acacia l r 0 Base bid - No boxes on trees. Alt. Bid Tree multi -port Fouquieria splendens s/m 1 0.5 0.5 I+ j.,i aC emitters shall be installed in emitter box per details. ocotillo fl 3. Contractor shall adjust controller for the proposed emitter Asclepias subulata s/m 2 1.0 2.0 schedule and provide watering to promote healthy growth of desert milkweed plant material for establishment. Euphorbia antisyphilitica s/m 1 1.0 1.0 _ 1 candelilla Das lirion wheeleri I 2 20 40 • c- f ''4 J `-'L.f S 1 desert spoon A ; -` �^-����_ �� � � 4- Heseraloearviflora f I J [jS ' - - t. brakelights yucca ! - EXISTING P 1.0 2.0 f IRRIGATION KEY NOTES # Hes eraloe nocturna s/m 2 I -: - o 1 SANCTUARY :, :: oe N I 1 + _ ._ .r: nightblooming hesperal FFE: 2660.5 -'': - 1. Pro erty line zi `P Ferocactus wislizenii s/m 0 0.0 0.0 Y{- > 9 Y fishhook barrel cactus �•. _ 2. Right of way line AREA: 5448 SF ! - '" Yucca pallida s/m 1 1.0 1.0 �/ ; 1/ � � ���-=�� � , � „�-�_;� •� 3. Limit of /clearing limits plans 4. Irrigation source - refer to civil water P o ` ale I f y 5. Mater valve and flow sensor p e yucca 4 ! •, � ` `\ yam. _ = `- Carne lea i antea 9 g 9 s/m 0 0.0 0.0 6. Backflow preventer w/ enclosure - �=_� 7. Irrigation sleeve, typ. saguaro _ �8. Irrigation mainline Lophocereus schoti s/m 1 1.0 1.0 g 9. Irrigation controller totem pole cactus KITCHEN '' _ = = 10. Connect valves to existing lateral lines Peniocereus greggii s/m 1 0.5 0.5 }- ' ! i =�' 11. Irrigation mainline stub for future use night blooming cereus AREA: AL&rl F � �-- = Ground Covers / Vines Type Outlets Gph Gph ` outlet plant o 1 ti I, y _ '' £ -� ' ` �_`_ : _=_� Lantana montevidensis slm 1 1.0 1.0 yellow trailing lantana Ole.i, - - OR _; _ ` Berlandiera lyrata s/m 1 0.5 0.5 - U}" chocolate flower 0 , <.., ` ' � +I 4 f Y - IS y.!:..��f „f+i i•J'. O` ---^`.-.._' /51 I = =7. .o IRRIGATION PLAN _ Scale: 120' REF. CASE OV12-92-09, OV12-05-05, OV1502124 PERMIT SET ARC 15092 � " = o IRRIGATION PLAN S FOR c ARC STUDIOS �o �PF ca F pF CANYON DEL ORO BAPTIST CHURCH 2 U ATMHSCOMPMY �Q Cr� �� 9� PHASE J. NEW SANCTUARY OF 3117E. Flower Street 39gi3 y IRREGULAR PARCEL BEING A PORTION Of S. 545' OF LOT 2 Tucson, AZ85716 5 ERIC R. M ALSO BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 24, T 12 S, R 13 E, G&SRM, 4 TWO xwkinq days before you dig, phone 520.882.9655 a BARRETT n TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA a www, irestudiosinc. com CAL FOR THE BLUE STAKES a 08/16 I-8D/ �% �Q DJR ERB 08 10 16 APPD BY 20 _ REF SCALE AS NOTED Q ��_ti'L%�iA`/�� S: ned/� pRWN BY �� ry(,ry lands a archi ture .urban design . ���~ DSGN BY ERe 08 10 16 Blue Stake en erE-iT environme ervices . irrigation design EXPIRES 9/30/2018 ERB 08 10 16 APPD BY 20 - O N0. DATE REVISION BY CH APPR CHKD BY �� PLAN NO. OV160D907 f - \ 7 `• 7 I _' NN _,_ - , %J1 \ - - - --------- - qW ,`- -`i' ...ate •!^ ,001 4� •i' •i ,4 .i �• it Y •v - a• • Q \\ / MR a _ - 4 `.+t a• .i _ 1 7 A / x• I 1 .. Wit_ ' ,-' � `;` �.-•...` '.''•'- •%'� ° / � i 1',1� / �/if � ~` 1 Leo (•— / �i � , �"� \ ,�• ! •;,.t Iji;il ; ''lji j';i1il�;+�' I'", , ,R, w _� ( \ ' / :,•s il'jI , ,I, 1'I;il}ii;i!'E ;{j1 ll,l ll f{ W T' j Ijl i' ;,II III t, , I1j j�I�1 '!''�ik1I1, 't If I III. I!f I•il' ,I iililt'j ,;,l;iyyl 1 lli /� / / / _ / _" i:\, �:- l' ill, �';� 1) it ii 1' I, ly,'11�,1 //• 1 d•.,. 'I t; I .I Ali II iI I�, ;l 11 , Il ;1 111 i / / / [/, I r I illli:l ij 'i 11I, 1� !i li i It li , Il t tltY /// I, ,1 / w el i ;!' �'��'• 1i!ft ? 1 •!;'I ij1'!'Iti+rii'ii' 'iiir!t'.1III11 t{� ,;II; w \ :! 6 ;:' VJ \ ,1 f ' j• % I�r .1; JI!! i ;t,+/i��j :�l, 'f 11 j1, j1'Ili'iil� I� i'iI i 1 i I I I i / ,� %/. I - 1• : �*•.- ( �t f + %; 1 i 1 � ; i ' { � , i f , i i i I I I ` I �i I I / / / / W r� _ 5 1 !:; 1(tr/ (;l 11lj ;{('{trj'iiril llil;(Ilili�l{iif iIII i111 //,:, — 1 ' -�.` j rj ;t J�r+'!'f( �t j!'jr; �r,tijijiljll'ItII' :,. .-- �1a �I i�il ' / /� Z �%/ ��•at," ..aa-•..��. ,^ti.. '+1 i+ 7!( I,�Ifjli(I!+ )I�',11 iij. I! //� � /// --•�,� —3 �� Itt1 '~ •/f'Il1I(f1`!j!ltjj�j1�I J� t - /iJi!�i�" - J, /,//'/i +lrr�lrilji/rr j1r _ ; ( J C,"::• !I%fir /1 (,11.%I1%ii ti;iii r % ' Y :::M : i% ! i f r ' 11., . (+ :' (i f j �_.�"�r__�•-� '._ r-,_ �j % / ./ ,// / / `•- V ' ' � _�._:- �-- r-"�-..---' �'--- �--•-^'_ / ` / r' / / /r l! I! it lllil 1 ' fjj/ '1 � ' 1 /f � � C'' ; ' • •/� �`!� ---'fir_--.r __..---�,-.� _ , j' i i l I i ' { 1 i � (, ; 1 / �/ /: / / //� / j (� '.i }i�, •;;•' �:� ij ' ' .t ~�i ���r-'�"-' % // // f ` f I 114 i i � t � j I' � i i I I/,rf /I %/r // /�/ / /�// /i ! \ �\ \ "^"` 7 +� I4ii/ ���. ,!III;j �rM/ '•' H j i i 1 i HIM I' i �... r `>' r //f // ���/%// -Piill;iillllijjli { 11 / I 1 1 1 / /• I. 1 i I I I r 1 rl R / is � � // 7/, • 1' 1 I , /, t {/ i/ 111 i1 11 1 I , 1 I / 1 • �. \i' I I ,.i i l r �`��•�'' - :. -yJ' '�� •I:(•y, , /l , / �%/-�I,1;'11l ;,�,Illlilj//`f /• i II!/,/; //f. f41 /. 1 i I i / /• '/ I I / I , 1 t / / ! i r /� / •i 1 I/ 1 : - I 1 / 7 ,r , •i r/ '1. (-?;•':''' , ,1',II I III /Ill ,/ / rl'% 1 , % — - ''b' • j` .�.._ i •re'� :��• •;.'i:�i. I 17 "*+�GLl.! %'I:;/! 'r 1 � � � ,'� iV FF 3 A-12 CLASSROOMS --_ f j i �` .,;.•, / 3 F F E : 2672 /1 AREA: 5400 SF _ _ _ _ _ _ I\� �• .�+��'C�� l / / / ` - �1 � `- fit\ � � / i ; / � ; � � � � ` � / � • _ � 1-_,_ 1 _.-._ _ 1 �`__��-R,.. - _ ♦, �_ � � ,.ten t t ♦ i � � �—J`/J � IRRIGATION PLAN Scale: 1" = 20' Scale - 1"= 20' CI = 1' 0 10' 20' 40' 60' IRRIGATION KEY NOTES 1. Property line 2. Right of way line 3. Limit of grading / clearing limits 4. Irrigation source - refer to civil water plans 5. Mater valve and flow sensor 6. Backflow preventer w/ enclosure 7. Irrigation sleeve, typ. 8. Irrigation mainline 9. Irrigation controller 10. Connect valves to existing lateral lines 11. Irrigation mainline stub for future use REF. CASE OV12-92-09, O02-05-05, OV1502124 IRRIGATION LEGEND furnish and install all material per plans, details, and specifications SV irrigation source / point of connection - irrigation meter - 5/8" (refer to civil water plans) N reduced pressure backflow preventer - watts u009 - 3/4" w/ enclosure irrigation mainline - sch. 40 pvc 1-1/2" w/ sch. 80 fittings, 2hr pressure test at 150 psi irrigation controller - rain master twice 2-wire, 36 station, tw-eg36 wall mounted controller ® master valve and flow sensor: master valve - superior 3100 n.o. - 1 "; flow sensor - cst fsi-t series - 1" © isolation valve - 1-1/2" lead free brass ball valve remote control valve & filter - valve - irritrol 700 series, 700-1; filter - rain bird rby-1 00-1 50mx i irrigation sleeve - class 200 pvc - 4" mainlines and multiple lines 2" single line and controller wiring tree line - sch. 40 pvc - 3/4" unless otherwise shown shrub line - sch. 40 pvc - 3/4" unless otherwise shown O hose end cap - pressure regulator - senniger - pmr-30-mf multi-outletxeri-bug emitters rain bird - (6) 1gph and 2 gph ports - refer to emitter schedule single -port emitters - install rain bird xeri-bug xbt-10 and xbt-20 - refer to emitter schedule ® quick coupler - brass coupling valve IRRIGATION VALVE SCHEDULE Valve Size Type Valve Size Type A-1 1" future A-8 1" shrub A-2 1" shrub A-9 1" tree A-3 1" tree A-10 1" tree A-4 1" tree A-11 1" shrub A-5 111 shrub A-12 1 I! tree A-6 1" tree A-13 1" shrub A-7 1" shrub A-14 1" future VALVE SCHEDULET NOTES: 1. Valve calculation is an estimate, contractor shall provide final valve flow in gallons per minute on as -built plans. 2. (M) multi -port emitter, (s) single -port emitter. Contractor may select to provide multi -port emitters for shrub plant material. Base bid - No boxes on trees. Alt. Bid Tree multi -port emitters shall be installed in emitter box per details. 3. Contractor shall adjust controller for the proposed emitter schedule and provide watering to promote healthy growth of plant material for establishment. REFER TO SHEET 2 FOR EMITTER SCHEDULE PERM! T SET ARC 150921 NOTES: 1. PROVIDE PROPER GROUNDING COMPONENTS TO ACHIEVE GROUND RESISTANCE OF 10 OHMS OR LESS. WALL MOUNTED CONTROLLER WALL MOUNTED CONTROLLER JUNCTION BOX 1" SCH 40 PVC CONDUIT, FITTINGS AND SWEEP ELL FOR POWER SUPPLY 3" SCH 40 PVC CONDUIT, FITTINGS AND SWEEP ELL FOR FIELD WIRES POWER SUPPLY LINE 1-1/2" DEDICATED GROUNDING CONDUIT (LINE UP GROUND LUG INSIDE CONTROLLER) FINISH GRADE COMPACTED SUB GRADE, TYP. FIELD WIRES NTS 'GUARDSHACK ENCLOSURE - DESERT TAN REDUCED PRESSURE BACK FLOW /Z"// PREVENTER BALL VALVE (1 OF 2) IF - - - - - - 'GUARDSHACK' FROSTGUARD - DESERT TAN COPPER ELL (1 OF 4) _J COPPER MALE ADAPTER (1 OF 2) 0 3/4" x 1-1/2" x 1-1/2" WELD TOP AND SIDE FINISH GRADE 4" CONCRETE SLAB, SLOPE TO DRAIN a :II I -I - 6"DIA. CONCRETE CUTOUT (2) I II 15 I i I II I II III-1 I -III 12" x 12" x 12" CONCRETE BASE (2500 PSI) =1I I=1I II1 111=1I I = COPPER PIPE (LENGTH AS REQUIRED) 1=f i I 11=1 - I 1=1 I r:-7I I 11= COPPER FEMALE ADAPTER -1 I -1 1=1 I -I 11=1 ICI i-1 11-11 f I=1 I E 11=1 11=1 11=1 I I =1 11=1 I EI I I SCH. 80. TOE NIPPLE & SCH. 40 SOLVENT II I Ill 1 lI 1111 111 111 II I �I 1 I I - 1 !1 ! I WELD COUP TO SCH. 40 PVC MAINLINE - III=1I I -III -I I1=1 I-11 DOMESTIC WATER LINE FROM SOURCE ALL COPPER CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1. INSTALL BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS REQUIRED BY LOCAL CODES AND HEALTH DEPARTMENT AND TEST FOR POTABLE WATER SOURCE. VERIFY LOCAL REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 2. PLACE BACKFLOW PREVENTER WITHIN SECURITY ENCLOSURE. (SEE SPECS.) 3. OPEN AND CLOSE ENCLOSURE WITHOUT MODIFICATIONS. REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW PREVENTOR NTS FINISH GRADE FINISH GRADE 30" LENGTH OF WIRE, 30" LENGTH OF WIRE, COILED COILED PEN -TITS CONNECTION OR PEN-TITE CONNECTION OR APPROVED EQUAL (1 OF 2) APPROVED EQUAL (1 OF 2) LARGE 14" PLASTIC VALVE STANDARD/JUMBO PLASTIC BOX W/ CONTINUOUS LIP VALVE BOX W/ CONTINUOUS BOLT DOWN COVER OR LIP BOLT DOWN COVER OR APPROVED EQUAL APPROVED EQUAL REMOTE CONTROL VALVE FLUSH VALVE REMOTE CONTROL BALL VALVE (ON SIDE) ) 1=1 1=! I -III-1 !=i I I _ 11=1 - - VALVE REFER TO SPECS. f=1 !=1 1=1 I BALL VALVE (ON SIDE) PVC NIPPLE (CLOSE (2)) 1=1 1=1 I �-11= - -= PVC NIPPLE (CLOSE (2)) -111= l I=1 I I 1= = PVC ELL (TxT) PVC ELL (TxT) ^I -' 1 EI I I :1., 1 I=1 �= 1 1-; 1=11= �_ - ,. - PVC NIPPLE (LENGTH AS -1 I -I ! I I =1 i l= f I I=1 I I-=1 f=1=1 11 11-- PVC NIPPLE (LENGTH AS REQUIRED) - ---III-� - - - 11 REQUIRED) - -I _ _ __ BRICK (1 OF 4) BRICK (1 OF 4) PVC NIPPLE (2" LENGTH, PVC NIPPLE (2" LENGTH, HIDDEN) AND ELL HIDDEN) AND ELL PVC TEE OR ELL PVC TEE OR ELL PVC MAINLINE PIPE PVC MAINLINE PIPE UNION - LINE SIZE (BOTH UNION - LINE SIZE (BOTH SIDES) NOTES: SIDES) 1. GREEN BOXES IN TURF AREAS. PVC MALE ADAPTER NOTES: 1 � GREEN BOXES IN TURF AREAS. FILTER -INSTALL FILTER ON SIDE OR DOWNWARD 450 2. TAN - IN HYDRO -SEED OR 2. TAN - IN HYDRO -SEED OR DECORATIVE ROCK AREAS. PVC LATERAL PIPE DECORATIVE ROCK AREAS. PVC MALE ADAPTER 3. PURPLE - RECLAIMED SYSTEMS 3. PURPLE - RECLAIMED SYSTEMS PVC LATERAL PIPE MASTER VALVE ASSEMBLY NOTES. 1. ADD BOX EXTENSIONS AS NECESSARY. 2. REFER TO PLANS FOR PIPE MATERIAL SPECS. QUICK COUPLER NTS REMOTE CONTROL VALVE - DRIP/BUBBLER NTS PIPE CROSSINGS ,-� 'I Z' 0 CV NOTES: \ 1, ALL MAINLINES TO BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE W/ MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. 2. TRENCH WIDTH & DEPTH TO VARY DEPENDING ON NUMBER & TYPES OF PIPES CONTAINED THERE IN. 3. TRACER WIRE AND METALLIC TAPE INSTALLED WITH MAINLINES, IRRIGATION TRENCHING MINIMUM DEPTH SHOWN FOR PIPE TYPE TRENCH FINISH GRADE DRIP LINE (PVC LINE) SPRINKLER LATERAL & EMITTER HEADER (PVC) MAINLINE & SLEEVE (SCH. 40 W/ PURPLE #18 INSULATED TRACER WIRE ATTACHED 8' O.C.12" OF WIRE ACCESSIBLE AT PIPE TERMINATION SECOND MAINLINE CONTROL WIRES (TAPE & BUNDLED EVERY 10') COMPACTED SUB GRADE NTS TREE TRUNK MULTI -PORT EMITTER TREE LINE REFER TO TRENCHING DETAIL FOR TREE LINE DEPTH ROOTBAL SECTION VIEW ROOTBALL LOCATE DISTRIBUTION TUBING 1/4"VINYL FROM TRUNK OF TREE: DISTRIBUTION 2 24 FROM TRUNK TUBING 3 4'-6' FROM TRUNK 3 6'-8' FROM TRUNK MULTI -PORT EMITTER NOTES: PLAN VIEW TREE LINE 1. INSTALL DISTRIBUTION TUBES EQUALLY AROUND EDGE OF ROOTBALL, DRIP TUBING AT SURFACE TO CLEAR FINAL GRADE BY A MIN. OF 1" AND A MAX. OF 2". DETAIL REPRESENTS TYP. INSTALLATION REFER TO IRRIGATION LEGEND FOR MULTI -PORT EMITTER QUANTITIES. MULTI -PORT EMITTER DRIP TUBING ( TREE NTS #9 WIRE ANCHORED Wl A BRICK FINISH GRADE PER PLAN BRICK 1-112'W" DUCT TAPE END, TYP. SLEEVE 4", TYP. NOTES: 1. ALL PVC IRRIGATION SLEEVES TO BE SCH. 40 PVC PIPE. 2. ALL JOINTS TO BE SOLVENT WELDED AND WATERTIGHT. 3. WHERE THERE IS MORE THAN ONE SLEEVE EXTEND THE SMALLER SLEEVE TO 24" MINIMUM ABOVE FINISH GRADE. 4. MECHANICALLY TAMP TO 95% PROCTOR. SLEEVING NTS PLASTIC VALVE BOX W/ LID 10" DIA. W/ CONTINUOUS LIP FOR LID FINISH GRADE VALVE BOX EXTENSION MANUAL IN -LINE BRASS BALL VALVE (LINE SIZE) (ON SIDE) PVC MALE ADAPTER, TYP. BOTH SIDES PVC MAINLINE UNION BRICK FOOTING (1 PER CORNER TYP.) GEOTEXTILE FABRIC LINER NOTES: 1. ADD BOX EXTENSIONS AS NECESSARY. ISOLATION BRASS BALL VALVE NTS FINISH GRADE FINISH GRADE NOTES: PIPE SIZE FLOW (GPM) =i =1 I I-1 t E- I I PLASTIC VALVE BOX W/ LID 10" _ _ 1/4" VINYL DISTRIBUTION TUBING 1. ALL 1/2" LATERAL PIPE TO BE CLASS 315 PVC. 112" 0 - 5 PLASTIC VALVE BOX W/LID W =111=11 EI - - i _ _ _ „ I1=1I I -III ll=ll(=lll: DIA. Wt CONTINUOUS LIP FOR LID ALL PIPE 3/4 TO 2-1/2 TO BE SCH. 40 PVC 3/4 5 - 10 10" DIA. W/ CONTINUOUS a =1 11= �I I-1 11=1 I �I F1 I E LIP FOR LID Z =11= UNION 11=11 � I I I I I 1=1 I PIPE 3" AND LARGER TO BE CLASS 200 PVC OR 1" 10 - 12 o II I11 I I I I-_ _ AS NOTED ON IRRIGATION LEGEND. 1-1/4" 12 - 20 W - �- ` I I=1I1=. PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE I1=1 i III I �+ MULTI -PORT EMITTER 2. MAIN LINE - SCH. 80 FITTINGS. 1-1/2" 20 - 30 FINISH GRADE PVC LINE FROM REMOTEI- I1=1_I 3. LATERAL AND DRIP LINES SCH. 40 FITTINGS. 2" 30 - 46 QUICK COUPLER W/ (1) KEY =11I-1 F =1I1= CONTROL VALVE ,� -1 I 1-1 �i I - - = SWING JOINT (3/4" PVC) 4. PRESSURE TESTS, 4 HOURS: 2-112" 46 - 60 #12 GA. GALVANIZED WIRE (2) I I -III- - PVC LATERAL LINE �SPECS PIPE • MAIN LINE AT 150 PSI 3" 60 - 110 NOTES: (3/4 PVC) • LATERALS AND DRIP LINE AT 70 PSI 4" 110 - 190 3/4 PVC NIPPLE (LENGTH I I-1 11=1 I I=1 1=1 I i=111=1 I (-1 I I-1 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC LINER 1, REFER TO PLANS FOR PIPE MATERIAL .TEE OR ELL (3/4 PVC) 6" 190 - 340 AS REQUIRED) VALVE BOX EXTENSION 3/4" PVC ELL 3/4" PVC STREET ELL 3/4"PV NIIPPLE(LENGTH AS 10 PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE �2 MULTI -PORT EMITTER PIPE SIZING SCHEDULE REQUI) NTS NTS 6 PVC STREET ELL PVC MAINLINE PVC TEE OR ELL BRICK FOOTING (1 PER CORNER TYP.) GEOTEXTILE FABRIC LINER #3 REBAR 24" MIN. NTS =1 I I-1 I I=1 11=1 11=_ ! I (-1 1 7 11=i 11=1 I �) I III-1 I �-I I Mrf' I m I rI I-1 I r1 I I-! I I- 11 I I-1 I rI I- 111=1 I I-11 -I I I=1 11=1 I- - 1I-1 7111=1 I I I 1=11 1-1 11=1 NOTES: ~ 1, REFER TO PLANS FOR PIPE MATERIAL SPECS SINGLE OUTLET EMITTER 1/4" VINYL DISTRIBUTION TUBING FINISH GRADE SINGLE OUTLET EMITTER SWING JOINT (3/4" PVC) PIPE (3/4" PVC) TEE OR ELL (3/4" PVC) NTS J H � 0 CD oZ NOTES: 1. REFER TO PLANS FOR PIPE MATERIAL SPECS, HOSE END CAP FINISH GRADE PLASTIC VALVE BOX W/ LID 10" DIA. W/ CONTINUOUS LIP FOR LID HOSE END FLUSH CAP NIPPLE (3/4" PVC) GEOTEXTILE FABRIC LINER TEE OR ELL (3W PVC) PIPE (3/4" PVC) NTS NTS REF. CASE 002-92-09, OV12-05-05, OV1502124 IRRIGATION NOTES: 1. The irrigation system shall utilize a potable water source. All lines shall be sch. 40 pvc unless otherwise noted on plans. 2. Water harvesting collection is passive water harvesting integrated into the site with depressions. 3. The irrigation system is designed with an operating pressure of 60psi at connection. Contractor shall verify pressure at connection and confirm system design with collected test information prior to continuation of installation. Tested pressure shall be noted on the as -built plans. 4. Contractor shall notify architect if any discrepancies occur prior to installation of the irrigation system. If the pressure test is not within 5 Ibs of noted design pressure, contractor shall cease installation until minimum pressure is obtained or revised design is provided. 5. Contractor shall test pressure prior to start of construction, test pressure 30 days prior to start of irrigation work and submit pressure tests and readings to architect. 6. If contractor fails to take, provide report and pressure is below design pressure, contractor shall make irrigation adjustments necessary to obtain a fully function irrigation system with adequate pressure at heads at no additional cost to the owner. 7. Sleeving for irrigation shall be under all paved areas including streets and sidewalks and other hardscape elements. Contractor to notify architect of sleeving layout prior to installation. 8. Irrigation lines, valves, and associated equipment are shown schematically. Contractor shall locate all lines in unpaved areas. 9. Maximum distance for distribution tubing shall not exceed 8' from emitter to plant. 10. Irrigation controller shall be set to run per coordination of property manager. Controller shall be set to run with et operation at completion of project. 11. Contractor shall set additional programs on controller for deep root watering and plant growth from march thru June. 12. Contractor shall complete pressure test of main line and laterals with the observation of the landscape architect. 13. Contractor shall have the irrigation functional, prior to start of planting. PERMIT SET ARC 150921 N CANYON DEL ORO BAPTIST CHURCH •i r�l�•� till{I{II{IIII �i� I■ 1111111 t{111� �j(>11 f11111 Illil} eneral notes 1. GROSS AREA OF PARCEL: 15.84 ACRES (689,990 SF) APPROXIMATE TOTAL OPEN AREA =13.02 ACRES (567,151 SF) SET ASIDE AREA OUTSIDE OF CONSTRUCTION AREA = 10.12 ACRES (440,671 SF) 2. ASSESSOR'S TAX PARCEL NUMBER IS: 225-10-064C-3 3. EXISTING ZONING IS PS&C 4. BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE: 14,266 SF EXISTING 24,086 SF NEW PHASE 3 5,400 SF NEW PHASE 4 43,752 SF TOTAL 39,300 SF PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TOTAL F.A.R. 43,752/689,990 = .063 5. DEVELOPER WILL COVENANT TO HOLD TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, HARMLESS IN THE EVENT OF FLOODING. 6. DRAINAGE WILL NOT BE ALTERED, DISTURBED OR OBSTRUCTED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL. 7. BASIS OF BEARING: RECORDED BEARING IS THE RECORDED BEARING PER THE DESCRIPTION UPON THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE, BETWEEN THE FOUND MONUMENTATION, N 89°59'53"W. 8. BASIS OF ELEVATION AND SITE TOPOGRAPHY: PIMA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS GEODIC CONTROL POINT "N21" ORTHOMETRIC HEIGHT, ELEVATION OF 2591.21, NAVD 88. LINflA VISTA.- __ /, . ; t / J _�� it / % + /i l TO HOUSES , / % W / :� N LOTS 1`` 63 i , t j; . , \ 1 / fi / ! 'ZONING R-1-1• / / / % Il. 1 i r 1. t i I i' B 26 PG 8 ;' ! ., l ; f I�; / ^� / , iyv�� \ i` J` I I / / r _ r •C'-•j _ - - - / /' J 1 i %I f i %, / / // I n f Y ; ri ,I f "1 / I NN ' i fl Z I O G ,1. 1 ' i r= J i R1 144, / / ,y % r i 1 / 1 / ''l / ; r. i /' / , f• r G ___ _ i ,u _.l f/jJf( J// t . /` i r t / i /:: 1 r It / / 1 r F \ ; v , `, / I t 1; \ ,� I i' r % `t 1, / r. r / /I t / 1- i / i i' i` , i I �7` l - , i' _ i' / �l I i / ! I / \/ / �% r; / / I / , -_ I J O iJ / \. / / ; 1 I if I } / i' f \ 4 /: I; 1 If � � �� `i I i /, 1;1 / 3 / r t i / if i l t I �� i (/ j J / i /{ l I \: . i t 2. d' % o ! t l 1 :r o J - ,.l Orl / i i' I I l J i /'ti ti .' r i ',o1 .: 1 %/ /% / f -. / - ` '. ,. F- I , q / 14. DRAINAGE WAYS ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO APPROVED.:PLANS PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMITS FROM THE TOWN ENGINEER AND/OR BUILDING OFFICIAL FOR PARCELS AFFECTED. 15. ALL EASEMENTS SHOWN ARE EXISTING. 16. EXISTING ELECTRICAL SERVICE EASEMENT PER DOCKET 5816, PAGE 745. 17. EXISTING WATER LINE EASEMENT PER DOCKET 12257, PAGE 1114. 18. APPROVED IMPROVEMENT PLANS AND APPROVED ASSURANCES WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS. 19. 12% OF FRONTAGE TO REMAIN OPEN SPACE: TOTAL FRONT BOUNDARY 1074' REQUIRED TO REMAIN OPEN 1.30' PROVIDED OPEN SPACE 996' 20. ORACLE ROAD SCENIC CORRIDOR DISTRICT. 60% VIEW CORRIDOR TO 300' FROM PROPERTY LINE. . 21. DESIGN VEHICLE FOR ALL VEHICLE TRAFFIC IS SU-30 AT 15 MPH, 22. ALL BUILDINGS ARE SINGLE STORY. 23. MATERIALS WITHIN SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLES MUST BE PLACED SO AS NOT TO INTERFERE WITH A VISIBILITY PLANE DESCRIBED BY TWO . HORIZONTAL LINES LOCATED THIRTY (30) INCHES AND SEVENTY TWO (72) INCHES. ABOVE FINISHED GRADE OF THE ROADWAY SURFACE. 24, FINAL SITE PLANS AND IMPROVEMENT PLAN MUST BE APPROVED FOR COMMERCIAL LOTS OR PADS PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY PERMITS BY THE TOWN ENGINEER AND/OR BUILDING OFFICIAL 25. DRAINAGE MUST BE COLLECTED AND RELEASED FROM A PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT THE LOCATIONS AND IN THE MANNER EXISTING PRIOR TO DEVELOPMENT. 26. DRAINAGE WAYS MUST BE PROVIDED WHERE NECESSARY TO CARRY DRAINAGE FLOWS THROUGH OR FROM THE DEVELOPMENT AND SUCH DRAINAGE WAYS MUST BE DEDICATED AND MAINTAINED BY PROPERTY OWNERS OR PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION. REFER TO SHEET 3 OF 5 FOR ADDITIONAL DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS. 27, DRAINAGE WAYS MUST BE DESIGNED TO NOT DISCHARGE ONTO PAVED STREETS, EASEMENTS OR PARKING AREAS. 28. WATER INFRASTRUCTURE AS REPRESENTED ON THIS PLAN IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. A SEPARATE WATER IMPROVEMENT PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY (OVWU) FOR TECHNICAL REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE STATUTES, CODES AND SPECIFICATIONS. ADDITIONAL WATER INFRASTRUCTURE MAY BE DEEMED NECESSARY UPON REVIEW OF THIE WATER IMPROVEMENT PLAN. narrative THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS ANTICIPATED TO TAKE PLACE IN FOUR PHASES. THESE PHASES AND THEIR ANTICIPATED TIMELINES ARE AS FOLLOWS; PHASE ONE: SANCTUARY EXPANSION, CLASSROOM ADDITION, AND WEST PARKING LOT UPGRADES. EXISTING, COMPLETED IN 2008. . PHASE TWO: LOBBY RENOVATION, KITCHEN ADDITION AND ADMINISTRATION EXPANSION. UNDER CONSTRUCTION, COMPLETION IN 2016. PHASE THREE: NEW SANCTUARY, EXISTING SANCTUARY CONVERTED TO FELLOWSHIP. YOUTH BUILDING, RELATED LANDSCAPING, WATER HARVESTING/DETENTION IMPROVEMENTS. NORTH PARKING AREA AND WATER HARVESTING. SITE IMPROVEMENT PLANS SUBMITTED CONCURRENT WITH THIS UPDATE. ANTICIPATED COMPLETION 2017. PHASE FOUR: CHILDREN'S EDUCATION BUILDING, RELATED LANDSCAPING, WATER HARVESTING/DETENTION IMPROVEMENTS. NO ADDITIONAL PARKING REQUIRED. ANTICIPATED TIME FRAME: 1 TO 2 YEARS. THE DESCRIBED PHASES ARE CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE IN ORDER AND SCHEDULE DEPENDANT ON CHURCH PRIORITIES AND REQUIREMENTS. , \ \ - I - - - - l _. s '\ - I i V ,\ \ r r , / 1 F , i 1 r f , p _ - _ - \ / r r \ I _ _ \ , , k l \. O \ _ r ( 1 r / , r f f Q \ t \ \ / , , _ \ , ND �H� R EAST r �� _ \ � RN E�R S E C TI 0 �4 _I N 4 \ j \ \ Jr 1 E` \ / ` \ 1 (� r \ / , /r i \ rN'D G A�` �A I L�' DR S P ,' 1 1 % _ r r ,' , _ \ t fi f .I I 1 i 1 , \ _ i 1 ~ y i^ i \ 1 f i•, >r - \ ty \ if , / , \ 1 \ is _ r i \ \ , , , \ I ; r I i - r' . 1 1 / / / " _ 1 t r i I i ,I \ \ l .-- \ f / . t !l / I t , t i _ i t �1 . \ \ _ i - J 1 ; - t 'u - \ ', I \ t i 1 \ \ \ I / _ -- \ \ / s i 1 I: r i i , \ \ i t , \ ! l_ \ t \ + tit: i I - - \ J , ,t _ \ \ I . - i t , 1 \ 1 _ i / \ I' \ r ,' l '; r- , �\ l f \ \ \ - f l ..-' r r' \ N • _� r Zfl tN �/ \ N c �) '� t 1 r /' i ( rr 1 . ': y `• r\ / ,' '�. \ , y \ , \ - '`. '\ t , :/- - _a 1 r _. 1 I , ', RUSCH RIQGE I . \ / / \ \ \ l r -_ \ r i q 1 _ \ _ t \ i 1 - i '/ r-- V /1 -\ \ , \ \ \ t I \ \\ \ \. 1, l l.7' I. i 1'.. ,,/ _ J 1 } / u \_ \ !.^ -� \. i , i /' t _ 1 \ t 1 1 � I r4 i4D 17� t i / C EM \ \ i \ _ L /' S i .�e Y / i t• i �� '\ t _ ES F5, - - ,- - �SE ET � O \ \ i \ HIE SEE $HEED Off' S - - -- 2� 1�U `U64B I, r' ~-!` �'\ .-'� , _ - t / I t \ r t \ .. t r 1 3 \ i , -4 - - - -T / f . ', \ \ _ r, I //(jam i � / ` % - r ! i \ ! \ -125 ,tl' SIS-- i \ M A Qr - BEARING PE,R /LE`�AL ,.DESC'RIPTIgN' z / / ;• , _ _ p 0 - _ / s G�If F ©M P c �` S 9 5' , 3 E �i �8� €a ti 4 _ 1 ,: & _ _ / � .',,; is / / / ._ _ _. \ __ _ _ e. \ i ✓� - 1 � HOSE I � / / 't ', AS \ rIl \ \ r _ r , i / -y i i \ ,_ \ t AT2KIN ® i 1� , - / 1 ! P / i G _ ,. � it J \ - - - i\ - SO __ I ZN . �J L �' S N D ETA i�� I E _ � 1 \ � C _ L lJT I A , � LITY_ AND E�' SEMEfiI`i t __ SEW E , \5� - --- - ti _ _ / / - l- \ I / -- / \ r� _ -r� - +r / \ , i I / l / / ....- �\ r i • \ �� \ \ 1 J 1 � i / i l / f / i` _ HA E III 1 t \ � 1 � is _ \ - 1 \ \ 1 _ 100 R CREA i i / i \ l \ \ r 1 !' \ ! t ; _ r sE _ PARKING / \ _ �" i _ / t - ® ® i EXI I \ i /I - / I t �� / / / CLA�S2Q r _._ \ _. / t \ AND � .� I OFFIC -� E~ • i - Y I t• i i � \ / ,1 t FF - I; - r r i E 2 � 66 I - - t i FFE ( • E l .5__ \ �� I _ , ! i AREA 3697 SF ' / J. , i } - / AREA 141 1 SF ; , i r' / % / -� , % 16 - �« I t / I i y r= � r _. 3 - /< . _ - - __ i { S - i ; j / _, i , i - - z 9 - r 6 1 '\.. is - / J I I m - -, I f' � , SC ZONING PAR"CEL \ f �', /' 'i 1 SANCTUARY '' s. 4- \ r t i 1 _ r i-. rs `\ � 225-'I'0-064C-3 - .. '; - 5 ,Y 5 t FFE - 2671 \ i , i 'i , r - 1 \ ........... EXISTING G ; - <<' DOCi 6292 P 974 ., t w -_, ; ; AREA 20,146 SF _ I, !' . \ I TH�S , TIOhI OF;tHE 51TE TO : / ,- 1 i , - ' i i 1 SANCTUA (� RY I PH J I_ - I ASE 111 ; T R CA YON E ORS BAPTIS FFE - 2660.5 i _. ; ' ..;,/ -. UND ED/ \ / i o - / I z REMAIN rS U. B 5 - O! I I 1 / 1_ I < / CHURCH " ; AREA 5448 SF ,/ i \ t -1 k, t / d _ \ \ \ / \ \, \ I / __ r" I \ 1!7 Y Tl�i -- v i RONADO __ FFE - - 2 2.7 r I 1 f� , 1 i s I / 1 \ « ,- �`�; : " : AND 5.5 I I ;: � .,:: ': -' -- _ ! i / I } 1 t: CHI ._ - LDRENS � C , A LASSROOMS . /`, : RSA- -. 0 SF I 1 l I I / / - I FFE-2 \ \.-- \ I i 671 AND 2669.91 PH - \ •, E fll / \ c \ :1-, / ARE / I 1 5 , � • � I PHASE IV I / / ,_ '� ; .y 'i / 1 1� FG ,1 MI. yi� ` " / `s -ISTR ; t ( C _ _ 1 s .. , _ _ !' - r a 1 1 � � I / ' ' I,. t _ r � � t !i , i '/ J � r� MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN OV1600907 9200 N. ORACLE RD. ORO VALLEY, AZ 85704 9. ACCESS ACROSS FLOOD PRONE AREAS TO BUILDING SITES WILL BE APPROVED BY THE TOWN ENGINEER AND SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DEVELOPER. 10. THE PROPERTY OWNER, HIS SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS AGREE TO 1) KEEP ALL REQUIRED LANDSCAPED AREAS MAINTAINED IN A WEED FREE, TRASH FREE CONDITION, 2) REPLACE ANY DEAD PLANT MATERIALS WITHIN 90 DAYS AND 3) MAINTAIN THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IN PROPER WORKING ORDER. 11. THIS MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN WAS PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED CONCURRENT WITH A DEVELOPMENT PLAN, OV #12-05-05. THAT DEVELOPMENT PLAN ADDRESSES PHASE 1 OF THIS MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN. CURRENT SUBMITTAL IS CONCURRENT WITH PHASE 3 SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL. ALL FUTURE PHASES WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTALS. 12. ORO VALLEY WATER IS CURRENTLY SERVING THE CHURCH. 13. PARKING ANALYSIS: REQUIRED: SANCTUARY FIXED SEATING 640 / 4 =160 10 EMPLOYEES (AT PEAK SUNDAY USE) 10 * 2/3 = 7 REQUIRED PARKING SPACES 167 (6 HC) PROVIDED: RECONFIGURED EXISTING ASPHALT 67 (3 HC) NORTH PARKING 100 (10 HC) TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED = 167 (13 HC) LOADING ZONE PROVIDED 1 BIKE PARKING (CLASS II) 167 / 20 = 9 REQ (10 PROVIDED) 16�,�1M NATIONAL FbRT/ L. / , S' ` It 00' / is / C_''. ; / r' I. I (u r , r r / ` N � / £, I I o o i I. 1 0 0 ,} 1 O O I I is I;. =� f �' 1� t t ?s 1 I -- .ism -_�' t;- \ ,•'� Z �,. �. Tr / a.- - / r V /' �/ , I / I /. t I _ , , .r" �,` 1 / ti / \. :, i \ \ \ t t i � �', • r /��, )" i \? _ :t _ f V / l k .� S/ \ / J -t e i r i v [/ f _ rI'r' \ , , 1 f - \. ` ` �C. \ ! _ I - '' 1 - ' , _ - - '. _ - +� t - \ ,t - , / , \ Q/ / \ IS, �Of�TfON OF I IUD /, / /. I u> \ \ - . \ _ \ _ \ - s r `/ L, ^/ ) - / { i.: , : - /� ' / / ry� ITE TO AIN �. -. I % f ��.r+ , y ..... ... I` , a \ \ 95 UNDISTURBE .� I : I - \ ,•i • \ t _ t _. \ , L / _ �,.-.-._.-._ r / nl 1� _ _ ! �- .,_ _ . . _,.�- - . _ . _ G .. / -� \ \ , �c..r.a'..r e�•.r.•rs r l.,r�- `f \ ..- PORTION�3F r .. . _... T __ ,. j -e � a.r'. - \' �- - ���-�. ( r , r' H S -•- -._ -._. FdRRONT �E I l . .�.•L - REMAIN I IIA , I I\ �665` \ : DKT, �29 - �, , �' , , -t / 2 i PG974 1 1 - �;,.- , / !: \ _ ~ 1 _ D i , t ~\ UN1 TURBE \ i \ - .; \` �.. t _ / - r / , I - -- / / I I , i \. _ . X $ - �' - r•-- - _.. 9 i a . .. S 00; E - - -r-� i t3 - _ _.�_ - N 89 5�16__ E \ 1 79.04/ - __. - , _.. \. .-.. - - _ �•- _ / � 1 I--•• - \ .,+ r , i / .--I'- \ ` -,_-- - -�.., / : \ � i' / i ' -+�. - _ - - .V '� 1, •r" \ J. , i t s `ti _-_ -/. %, "\ � _ .. O - i -_. - �. } / / - i/ I , r , --- __- _ _ - -- _ -- - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . _ __ . -..�.,,: , ° - �`� _�� 8 5t:8,26;tR) ____ ��_ _ ._ .-__ �..._ , s 9 59r 5a. E _ / 5 ) ' 1 -- / 3 8, 21 C N / CALLS C: NC RD1A (PUBLIC) �, \ . \ -_ - _ = , ?�� _ _ M ... - -.5 89 59 03 - _ _ _ / . _. _ _ \ / -: _ . -- _ - - - -- - - _ _ - - -- - _ -- .., _ - - - _ - __.. 't - _ - .. r \ c , .. .., , r ../. .. __...-__......._ ... �- � ' --..... _ ,,- .. ,-= ,. / . / '' r -- -- \ it :\ - - '`/� , : / ! , ,` C,� Q \ r / S DO M `TA , , �; _ _L� IaS \ • , r_ HAIl. ®UN I ESfAT S S \ 7d -x _ 1 _ \ i _ �� //i / \ r _ t w __ _ . '�'N + - - , � _ r L S 8 .1� LOT \ }-- m A / _ t I' I /LOT6 , t t - \ i i ' ,- 1' / , -LOT 55 - / t r ~ - / {�.NIN p "'o1'.. ZO I r t - : G / v \ t r , _ , SINGLE t \ , , / ' \ / / / - _ t F; \` i r l \ = ,i t _ r 1/ tom- \ t 1 r ,' - _ - 1 4 1 i `� \ , gkC 1 ,� �3 I ! _r \ . i i \ '0 / \ \ - _ t r! \ : t.t • , f 5 \ r i -_ i / l RESIDENCE - r l , \' `\ / t I r ! / a \ t !\ I` i _ i i ! , 1 , ! t 1 , : : ` SINGLE \,> GLE _ 1 / i b ! I f �� / N / \ i ` BSI LE T , t � , AMILY f FAMILY \ - �. ,- _ ` , , . i , , t', I � ��' SINGLE - \ . I . t / ; / ,\ - .'\ _ ; (: / / , / I \, _ ,I , _ I 1 . ESIDE �E __. / / I, \ I ESID \ \ i FAMILY I- RESIDENCE �" ,:. t \ \ R E �I -.. - \ I , I r / t RESIDENC t'\ r , , \ \ , . - \ ESIDENC I \ - \ .-.. . t . / R - f / J .� - _ , . �.-. I '1 i / / r \f I t i / SINGLE \ " t ' . i\ I / !} i ` - t ` it . / / I: It r" 1 / f /�; ! / ,� i /, ti • ri ( t/ , , r ;I% , / v ! / 1 i / ` ,/I i' % I' 1 r 0 Q i F { - -,. - - - - Y �' - r .._ t 14 7V !'4 r� f' `.' a .. -. P15 A / �. '2, N f i i / % / , / / f v t l Cj 1 f I / / 3, ,/ s I 4.oh; i ; !`' , f l // , / , '' I . '� / i PFIASE 1 r / -�=. PAR / ,7 1 1 / LINE ' BEARING • ISTANC '' E ' L1R&M N o / }r - 70 L5 22 W . 49A0 1 ` 2R&IM S,, 19°44'38a W 1 4.&O" iL3R&Mi S 7Q°15'22a E� 49,U0' ` L4C � S ` o /, a 00 01 00 E %a / ' 4.5,06 ,L R), ,S o / a /Cf0 0'0 25 ; v '' . 45,00' TOWN E12-13- PUSCH RIDG CHRISTIAN ACADEMY I����s��wi��ww=wws/sl���� �! • • a • 3" = 1 miles E12-14-19 CORONADO NATIONAL FOREST sheet index 1. GENERAL NOTES AND SITE PLAN 2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE - WEST 8. GRADING AND DRAINAGE - EAST ' 4. SECTIONS 5. SECTIONS, DETAILS AND TITLE REPORT NOTES - ke no #es y n 1 SANCTUARY PHA SE 111 20146 . . ( 1 S F MAX HEIGHT FROM ADJACENT GRADE 36' 2. YO TH U AREA (PHASE III) 3940 S.F. MAX HEIGHT FROM ADJACENT GRADE 22' 3. SPLIT FACE CONCRETE MASONRY WALL. SEE ATTACHED F R H HT O EIG S. 4. CHILDREN'S CLASSROOMS (PHASE IV) 5400 S.F. MAX HEIGHT FROM ADJACENT GRADE 22' 5. EXI T N S I G BU1LDlN GS. 6. EXP ANSI N F O O EXISTING BUILDINGS (PHASE II) 7. KITCHEN (PHASE II) ' 8. DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE - SPLIT FACE CMU WITH STEEL GATE. 9. WATER HARV ESTING / DETENT AREA P ION (RASED WITH I MMEDlATELY ADJACENT STRUCTURE). 10. PARKING (PHASE I11) DESIGN SPEED =15 MPH, DESIGN VEHICLES = SU - 30 11. EXISTING PARK ING WITH IMPR VEMENTS PH O ASEI D = _ _ ESlGN SPEED 1 5 MPH DESIGN VEH LES IC SU 30 12. F UTURE CROSS CONNECTION OF PARKING BETWEEN SCHOOL AND H R C U CH PAR L T KING O S. 13 L AD O ING ZON E AND PASSENGER DROP OFF AREA. 1 4. EXISTING CROSS ACCESS AND PARKING CONNECTION. 15. FIRE HYDRANT. 16. CLASS 11 BIKE PARKING. NUMBER OF SPACES NOTED. $ 30 DATE TOWN. CLERK • DATE - P _ ING A„ ZONING ADMINISTRATOR I is, , 3 Rya a +� n am DATE T WN EN NEE O GI R 9Z S l� DATE ORO LEY WATER UTILITY DIRECTOR owner CANYON DEL ORO BAPTIST CHURCH 92 RA LE R 00 N. O C OAD TUCSON ARIZO A N 85704 520 297-3900 CONTACT: PASTOR STEVE VANKLEY svankley@cdobaptistorg le al descry ion t g p IRR EGULAR PARCEL IN BE G PORTION OF 5545 OF LOT 2• 15.84 AC; T12S, R13E, G&SRB&M, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA swaim AS30CIATES LTD ARCHITECTS AIA 7350 EAST SPEEDWAY 210 TUCSON, ARIZONA 85710 OFFICE (520) 326-3700 FAX (520) 326-1148 www.swaimaia.com sheet information DRAWING : MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN SCALE : 1" = 60'-0" CONTOUR INTERVAL : V-0" ' 0 1 0 project information .�I 1.•II.�A•�. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PREVIOUS CASE NUMBERS: OV12-05-05, OV1502124 CURRENT TOWN OF ORO VALLEY CASE NUMBER: OV1600907 DATE OF ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL: 03-17-06 DATE OF THIS RESUBMITTAL: 08-10-16 SHEET 1 OF 5 ejzl'�l .' / ��/ I / DKT. 5516, PG. 745 "' / ' / 1 j - LLJ 77 C aviengineering . isnddnstp rent wwM • eWonmeptalmtes A" • flood aftdand drainage Two worW" days before you ft CALL FOR THE BLUE SNAKES �W782WV17V-qA Engineering and Environmental Consultants, Inc. 4625 East Fort Lowell Road ( Tucson, Arizona 85712 " 1-800—STAKE—IT " Blue stoke Center Tel 520.321.4625 1 Fax 520.321.0333 CURRENT CASE NUMBER: OV1600907 REF. CASE NUMBERS: OV121502124 SEC 6006 OV12-05-05 MASTER DEVELMMIT PLAN OR 2 o� F CANYON DEL ORO CHURCH n{ Q o iCA7Fp r PHASE J. NEW SANCTUARY OF I.ORO IRREGULAR PARCEL BEING A POR77ON OF S. 545' OF LOT 2 39526 ALSO BEING A PORAON OF SECTION 24, T 12 S, R 13 E, G&SRM, 5 RYAN RICHARD STUCKI TOWN OF VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY ARIZONA se `' DRWN BY BWT 02 25 16 APPD BY 20 _ REF SCALE ��2flNA USP DSGN BY BWT 02 25 16 CHKD BY RRS 02 255 16 APPD BY 20 — PLAN NO. OV1600907 EXPIRES 9/30/2018 50 BUILDING SETBACK, UTILITY AND SEWER EASEMENT r- DKT. 6292, PG. 974 20' 020' 40' SCALE: 1 INCH = 20 FEET CONTOUR INTERVAL = 1 FOOT NOTE. CANYON DEL ORO BAPTIST CHURCH ACKNOWLEDGES THAT IN THE UNLIKELY EVENT OF A WATER MAIN LEAK OR RUPTURE THAT STRUCTURAL DAMAGE TO ADJACENT CANYON DEL ORO BAPTIST CHURCH OWNED BUILDINGSISTRUCTURES MAY OCCUR. CANYON DEL ORO BAPTIST CHURCH FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGES AND HOLDS THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY HARMLESS FOR ANY DAMAGE THAT MAY OCCUR IN THE UNLIKELY EVENT OF A WATER MAIN LEAK OR RUPTURE, EXCEPT ANY SUCH INJURIES OR DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE TOWN, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS OR EMPLOYEES AS STATED IN,,ARTICLE 011 OF THE LINE EXTENSION AGREEMENT (RESOLUTION 03-112). (A) THE CDO BAPTIST CHURCH SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, AND LIABILITY FOR DRAINAGE STRUCTURES AND DETENTION BASINS; (8) THE CDO BAPTIST CHURCH SHALL HAVE AN ARIZONA REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER PREPARE A CERTIFIED INSPECTION REPORT FOR THE DRAINAGE AND DETENTION FACILITIES AT LEAST ONCE EACH YEAR, AND THAT THESE REGULAR INSPECTION REPORTS WILL BE ON FILE WITH THE CDO BAPTIST CHURCH FOR REVIEW BY TOWN STAFF, UPON WRITTEN REQUEST; (C) TOWN STAFF MAY PERIODICALLY INSPECT THE DRAINAGE AND DETENTION FACILITIES TO VERIFY THAT SCHEDULED AND UNSCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES ARE BEING PERFORMED ADEQUATELY; AND (D) THE OWNER OR OWNERS AGREE TO REIMBURSE THE TOWN FOR ANY AND ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH MAINTAINING THE DRAINAGE AND DETENTION FACILITIES, SHOULD THE TOWN FIND THE OWNER OR OWNERS DEFICIENT IN THEIR OBLIGATION TD ADEQUATELY OPERATE AND MAINTAIN THEIR FACILITIES, AND (E) MAINTENANCE RECORDS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY STORMWATER UTILITY ON AN ANNUAL BASIS, ON OR BEFORE JULY 1ST OF EACH YEAR. GRADING PA SING KEYN0 TES �1 SAWCUT EXISTING PAVEMENT 1' MINIMUM TO PROVIDE NEAT EDGE, TRIM, TACK AND JOIN TO MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT. PROPOSED PAVEMENT, 2.5" AC OVER 4" AB. O3 PROPOSED CONCRETE VERTICAL CURB, TYPE 2, PER PC/COT SO 209, ® PROPOSED CURB OPENING (DEPRESSED CURB PER PC/COT SD 209, 3 LF CONCRETE CURB TERMINAL SECTION PER PC/COT SO 212 ON BOTH ENDS OF CURB OPENING). �5 PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER PC/COT SD 200. © PROPOSED HARDSCAPE PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS �7 PROPOSED RETAINING WALL PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SEE TO"OTTOM OF WALL DIAGRAM DETAIL 10 ON SHEET 4. PROPOSED STEM WALL. 1. y „ p 2g GRADE TO DRAIN. YOUTH -�` � •�0 �' 4a f t r; j p 6p Viz ; 10 PROPOSED CONCRETE STAIRS (5-3/4" RISE/14" RUN) PER PC/COT SO 104. kREA=2,662 SF HEIGHT=21' DETENTION BASIN 1 11 T r 1 9,• . f ,K z� 6 _'� '' '�• �1'� ( ,r % �/ 11 PROPOSED 1' THICK RIPRAP (D50--6") OVER FILTER FABRIC. PHASE 11I VOLUME=517 CFp , �. 6 { f FFE=65.50 , I WSEL=2665.10 I ' , ' 4' 1 \ f 14 PROPOSED 6" X 12" CONCRETE HEADER PER PC/COT SO 213. yFro- i .. N !jf FFE=69.91 I � "s .. •, , � � I • • � , , � ' ' � • • � 6 � � 15 PROPOSED CONCRETE CURB TERMINAL SECTION PER PC/COT SD 212. FFE=69.91 { _ � / 16 PROPOSED SECURITY FENCING/BARRICADE RAILING FOR TOP OF WALL/SLOPE. _ - EX/STING FLOWLINE-60.8 `�/ j - - � � ! /� 7 EXISTING FLOWLINE-59.4 7 SCOUR ELEVATION=57.4 _ _ FIE=71.00 2� 19 1 1 PROPOSED POST BARRICADES (TYPE "A") PER PC/COT SD 106. SCOUR ELEVA TION =56.0 CHILDRENS CLASSROOMS '�- FFE=69.91 ! AREA=6,000 SF •� ,, \ " " �.� ` - - • 'EXISTING FLOWLINE=63.8 7 p:�r.: �• p / i8 PROPOSED 6 X 24 CONCRETE TOE -DOWN. `�:� � j HEIGHT-21 . � R- SCOUR ELEVATION=61.4 ` � ` � � � � l � � PHASE I V , , 19 PROPOSED HYDRO SEED MIX PER LANDSCAPE PLANS. 0 PROPOSED SHADE CANOPY PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. I _ �GR Q10o EX=5.0 CFS PREVIOUSLY FFE=71.00 FFE=71.00 _ • -� DISTURBED} ,` 1 PRO-5.0 CFS O 7 1 '-.t: �.:- �- =•� ��• ' � � � , � ` � 21 PROPOSED REVEGA TA 110N AREA PER LANDSCAPE PLANS EROSION HAZARD ' 45 �` ';:y� - - �� • � � � � �g PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREA PER LANDSCAPE PLANS. '`'; _- '' SETBACK LINE PROPOSED GRADING LIMITS GRADING LIMIT LINE TO BE A MINIMUM OF 2 FEET FROM PARCEL BOUNDARY LINE). i- i RFARIANIA XERORIPARIAN \ CURRENT CASE NUMBER. OV1600907 REFF, CASE NUMBERS. OV121502124 OV12-05-05 PROPOSED DEPRESSED CURB PER PC/COT SO 209. PROPOSED 6 LF CONCRETE WHEEL STOP PER DETAIL 5 SHEET 5. ® PROPOSED STANDARD/ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE PER DETAIL 6 SHEET 5. 2�9 PROPOSED DISABLED PARKING SIGN PER DETAIL 7 SHEET 5. 3�0 PROPOSED THICKENED PAVEMENT EDGE PER DETAIL 8 SHEET 5. 31 PROPOSED 3" D1A. TUFF POST IMPACT RECOVERY DELINEATORS, WHITE WITH A BLACK CAP, 42" TALL, OR APPROVED EQUAL. © SEE STRUCTURAL/BUILDING PLANS FOR FOUNDATION DRAINAGE AND DEPTH OF FOOTER BELOW SCOUR ELEVATION. 39 PROPOSED 4" WHITE PARKING STRIPING PER DETAIL 6 SHEET 5. 42 30' X 10' PAAL-to-PAAL SVT. ® PROPOSED CLASS 11 BIKE PARKING. 44 PROPOSED D.G. PATH PER LANDSCAPE PLANS. ® PROPOSED TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FENCING STORM DRAIN KEYNOTES ❑3 PROPOSED 1-18" D1A. X 65 LF HDPE SO PIPE 0 3. 0890 ® PROPOSED 1-18" DIA. X 88 LF HDPE SD PIPE 0 0.69.E 7Q PROPOSED SO INLET WITH NYLOPLAST 2' X 2' GRATE (PART 13218AGS) OR APPROVED EQUAL. GRATE=2663.50, 18"INV=2661.00 ® PROPOSED SO INLET WITH NYLOPLAST 2' X 2' GRATE (PART 13218AGS) OR APPROVED EQUAL. GRA TF=2664.40, 18 "1N V--2661.90 Q PROPOSED NYLOPLAST BUBBLE --UP BASIN (SEE -DETAIL 9, SHEET 4). GRATE=2663.79, 18"INV=2661.29 EEC 160061 Q100=18.11 CFS V = 7.35 FPS 24" SD INV=46.00 _ T- - L~ 8s (EXIST) EXISTING 1 THICK RIPRAP (D50=6") OVER FIL TER FABRIC 53, WSE=49.26 EXISTING GROUND VAR. 2' TOP-50.00 2 3 1 21 WSE= 50.35 WEIR FL =47.60 0.5% MIN. 10 1 10 24" SD 6" ORIFICE INV=46.58 3' FL=46.58 EXISTING TOP=50.00 (.--8" SEWER 3' INV=39.00i CONCRETE OUTLET WEIR 1' WEIR FL STRUCTURE =47.60 BASIN I 6" ORIFICE OUTLET PIPE SECTION BOTTOM f.I FL=46.58 -- 1' MIN. SECTION A -A 1.8'f PL 20' PARKING '� 3' IW RETAINING WALL EXPOSED HEIGHT 4'f VARIES 0'-2' - 2 3BW EXISTING 7 GROUND *AREAS WITH RETAINING WALL HEIGHT 0-2' NORTH PROPERTY LINE SECTION 3' 9' 3' EXIS71NG GROUND =65.20 ti 1.3' N TS 1,3' 6' 59.00 EXISTING GROUND � 3' . 10' 3' 7' 56.26f MA TCH 16 17' 13' 18' EXIS71NG _N 55.02 �.l t EXIS71NG - GROUND - r-46.73 : " /V. EXISTING 8" PUBLIC WATER TO BE LOWERED TO PROVIDE 44" MINIMUM COVER FROM PROPOSED FINISH GRADE. 25' _ 9' 6' 6' 3' 66.06 Q 2.0'X10:1 63.73 N.1 -" r 14' Q10e4.0 CFS V =2.26 FPS BASIN/STORM DRAIN SECTION N TS CONCRETE APRON PER PC/COT SD 309 MODIFIED TO A MINIMUM WIDTH OF 2 FEET NYLOPLAST 12" LOCKABLE GRA TE FROM EDGE OF GRATE IN ALL DIRECTIONS (PART #1899CGP) AND GRATE RAISED 0.1' MIN. ABOVE GRATE ELEVATION=63.72 SURROUNDING TERRAIN. // " NYLOPLAST BUBBLE UP ;X % DRAIN BASIN 18" STORM DRAIN - INV=61.22 ` (PART #2818AG) \` 7 \\ X`�' , 4 5 40 C.F OF OPEN GRADED ROCK OR COBBLES N .-, r FILTER FABRIC NON- WOVEN SECTION A -A r.��_NYLOPLAST BUBBLE UP NTS 3' BASIN SECTION � NTS 18' >.50 -65.00 19 63.5007 -64.00 _ r - - WSE= 3.47_ /- . 1.00 Q100= 7.64 CFS V =10.13 FPS _OUTLET PIPE SECTION NTS BOTTOM FINISH GRADE NOTED AS "BW" IN PLAN VIEW (NOT TOP OF FOOTING) 36' TOP OF WALL NOTED AS "TW" 1N PLAN VIEW FOOTING DESIGN BY OTHERS TOP/BOTTOM OF WALL DIAGRAM 6' , 4' 2' 15' PUBLIC WATER ESM'T 16' 6' 2' I 1 O I 63.39 65L__BW 14 RETAINING WALL I EXPOSED HEIGHT 2.0% 1 VARIES 2'-3.80 60.4155.80f TOP OF 9 EXISTING CONC. SIDEWALK TO REMAIN EXISTING 12" WATER if 2.3'f 1 PL 20' PARKING 8„1 16 RETAINING WALL 3' EXPOSED HEIGHT 7 VARIES 2'-4.3' 3.0% EXISTING - GROUND 30 2 3' 7 *AREAS WITH RETAINING WALL HEIGHT >2' NORTH PROPERTY LINE SECTION N TS civil engineering a land development surveying . environmental services staking . flood control and drainage Two working days before you dig, transportation GALL FOR THE BLUE STAKES 1--_Engineering and Environmental Consultants, Inc. M782W-W 4625 East Fort Lowell Road I Tucson, Arizona 85712 " 1-800-STAKE-IT " Blue Stake center Tel 520.321.4625 1 Fax 520.321.0333 E G 2n' 1 Q' 1 g, A' iz' A' 4 n' �J� NTS -58.47 7 31 ' 24' 4' 77' 25.3' 69. 76 TW 70.26 6 7071.00-\ . 79 FFE= 71. 06 2.0% 1.2% 12:1 -- . EXISTING �`r < `i��7`;\i' > , % . %; %i r �i/, /X'/ GROUND 67.26BW , ; , �, ; ,., ` r r� ,� i 66.50 ' \� 21 �'��\ ��/ ... ; �� i r ; ,r ✓ / i`rr��`� �� -65.00TW ® 63. 79 ( g:1 �i� r��. �� .. \/ j\, �,, ,� /\/r i,P�/ /\\, , ; r i\�,. r,��r i,� %,</ -64.00BW __--_-------- 65.00 - 0. 77, 0, 9% 64.0 21 7 18" INV=61. BASIN/HARDSCAPE SECTION NTS GRADING/PA VING KEYNOTES O SAWCUT EXISTING PAVEMENT 1' MINIMUM TO PROVIDE NEAT EDGE, TRIM, TACK AND JOIN TO MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT. 20 PROPOSED PAVEMENT, 2.5" AC OVER 4" AB. 3O PROPOSED CONCRETE VERTICAL CURB, TYPE 2, PER PC/COT SO 209. ® PROPOSED CURB OPENING (DEPRESSED CURB PER PC/COT SD 209, 3 LF CONCRETE CURB TERMINAL SECTION PER PC/COT SD 212 ON BOTH ENDS OF CURB OPENING). 5� PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER PC/COT SO 200. 6� PROPOSED HARDSCAPE PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. �7 PROPOSED RETAINING WALL PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SEE TOPAOTTOM OF WALL DIAGRAM DETAIL 10 ON SHEET 4. 11 PROPOSED 1' THICK RIPRAP (D.=6") OVER FILTER FABRIC. 12 PROPOSED 2' THICK RIPRAP (D,,=12") OVER FILTER FABRIC. 1© PROPOSED SEDIMENT WATTLES FIRST FLUSH DEVICE, 14 PROPOSED 6" X 12" CONCRETE HEADER PER PC/COT SD 213 16 PROPOSED SECURITY FENCING/BARRICADE RAILING FOR TOP OF WALL/SLOPE. Q PROPOSED POST BARRICADES (TYPE "A") PER PC/COT SD 106. 18 PROPOSED 6" X 24" CONCRETE TOE -DOWN. 19 PROPOSED HYDRO SEED MIX PER LANDSCAPE PLANS. ©0 PROPOSED SHADE CANOPY PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. 21 PROPOSED REVEGA TA 77ON AREA PER LANDSCAPE PLANS. ® PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREA PER LANDSCAPE PLANS © PROPOSED 6 LF CONCRETE WHEEL STOP PER DETAIL 5 SHEET 5. ® PROPOSED THICKENED PAVEMENT EDGE PER DETAIL 8 SHEET 5. © PROPOSED CONCRETE BENCH/SEATWALL STRUCTURE PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. EEC 16006 MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN o, F CANYON DEL ORO BAPTIST CHURCH 4 PHASE 3: NEW SANCTUARY OF IRREGULAR PARCEL BEING A PORTION OF S. 545' OF LOT 2 5 39526 ALSO BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 24, T 12 S, R 13 E, G&SRM, RYAN RICHARD o TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA STUCKI d <' DRWN BY BWT 02 25 16 APPD BY 20- REF SCALE AS NO �Rv20NA ASP DSGN BY BWT 02 25 16 NO. DATE REVISION BY CH APPR EXPIRES 9/30/2018 CHKD BY RRS 02 25 16 APPD BY 20- PLAN NO. O V 1 6OOJ® N TS STORM DRAIN KEYNOTES ❑1 PROPOSED 1-24" DIA. X 71 LF RCP SO PIPE 0 0. 70%t ®2 PROPOSED 2-24" DIA. X 41 LF HDPE SD PIPE 0 1.22% 3� PROPOSED 1-18" DIA. X 65 LF HDPE SO PIPE 0 3.08% ® PROPOSED 1-18" DIA. X 88 LF HDPE SD PIPE 0 0. 69% 07 PROPOSED SD INLET WITH NYLOPLAST 2' X 2' GRATE (PART 13216AGS) OR APPROVED EQUAL. GRATE=2663.50, 18"INV=2661.00 ® PROPOSED SD INLET WITH NYLOPLAST 2' X 2' GRATE (PART 13218A GS) OR APPROVED EQUAL. GRATE=2664.40, 18"INV=2661.90 ® PROPOSED NYLOPLAST BUBBLE -UP BASIN (SEE DETAIL 9, SHEET 4). GRATE=2663.79, 18"INV=2661.29 10 PACIFIC CORRUGATED PIPE SAFETY SLOPE END SECTION FOR 4:1 SLOPE WITH OPTIONAL PARALLEL SAFETY BARS AND CROSS DRAINAGE BAR OR APPROVED EQUAL. 1' WIDE X 6" THICK CONCRETE COLLAR (CLASS "B") AROUND END SECTION. 11 PROPOSED CATCH BASIN TYPE 4 PER PC/COT SD 309 WITH (1) EF-1 GRATE PER PC/COT SD 311. INSTALL FloGord CATCH BASIN INSERT FILTER FOR FIRST FLUSH TREATMENT. GRATE=2655.35, 18" INV=2650.50 CURRENT CASE NUMBER: OV7600907 REF. CASE NUMBERS: OV121502124 OV12-05-05 12' 10' lip EXISTING GROUND 75.90 75.30 75.10� A� 5. °g 2.0y BUILDING i9 FFE= 71.00 19 8 BUILDING/ACCESS DRIVE SECTION N IS 0 N 9' 9' j_5j' 9' STANDARD SPACE ACCESSIBLE SPACE DISABLED PARKING PAVEMENT MARKINGS PER PC/COT & A.D.A. S7D'S. (COLOR, SYMBOL, STRIPING) Q 4" WHITE STRIPE © DISABLED PARKING SIGN, SEE DETAIL 7 SHEET 5. A MAXIMUM 29' (1: 48) SLOPE IN ALL DIRECTIONS AT ALL AREAS OF THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING LAYOUT AS PER 2010 ADA STANDARDS FOR ACCESSIBLE DESIGN, SECTION 502.4. 9' WIDTH FOR STANDARD ACCESSIBLE SPACE, 11' WIDTH FOR VAN ACCESSIBLE SPACE. SEE PLAN FOR LOCATIONS. 6 TYPICAL PARKING DETAIL NTS EXISTING GROUND 20' 6' --- __ - 71.84 71.L`j� 5 VARIES 10 7' 2' 0.5' DEEP 74.38 DIVERSION EXISTING 74.86 74,23 �SWALE GROUND �1.49a �1 f 0.5' TALL D2J DIVERSION BERM PARKING/ACCESS DRIVE SECTION NTS t1m: 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE GIVEN IN INCHES. 2. THESE SIGNS ARE NOT AVAILABLE THROUGH THE TOWN, BUT CAN BE PURCHASED AT PRIVATE BARRICADE AND SIGN COMPANIES. 3. BOTTOM OF "RESERVED PARKING" SIGN SHALL BE ?'ABOVE FINISH GRADE. 4. OMIT "VAN ACCESSIBLE" SUPPLEMENTAL ' PLAQUE IN STANDARD DISABLED PARKING SPACES. F ERVED KING DISABLED t LATE OR PERMIT ONLY MOT BLOCK ACCESS AISLERD VALLEY TOWN CODE 11-4.3.A VANACCESSIBLE DISABLED PARKING SIGN DETAIL 1.4 2.0 0.5 2.0 0.5 5.0 0.3 to 0.3 1.0 0.3 to 0.3 1.2 0.5 Q_LgSS_ DRIVE SECTION Nrs AC 9d'" THICKENED PAVEMENT EDGE NTS L"� NTS i%T:4 2. of AC 4" ABC COMPACT TO 10090 DENSITY SCARIFY TO 8" DEPTH, RECOMPACT TO 957o MIN. DENSI TY r,�T�YPIC�AL�PA VEMEN T SECTION N TS CURB LENGTH = 6 FEET CLASS "B" CONC. 6" (2,500 PSI, 28 DA YS) 1 "R APPLY CRS-2 MASTIC TACK UNDER CURB �A. C. - A.B."C. 14 REBAR ® 3' LONG WHEEL STOP J NTS GRADING/PAVING KEYNOTES 2O PROPOSED PAVEMENT, 2.5" AC OVER 4" AB. O3 PROPOSED CONCRETE VERTICAL CURB, TYPE 2, PER PC/COT SO 209. 5O PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER PC/CDT SD 200. ® PROPOSED STEM WALL. 11 PROPOSED 1' THICK RIPRAP (D,,=6-) OVER FILTER FABRIC. 14 PROPOSED 6" X 12" CONCRETE HEADER PER PC/CDT SO 213. 16 PROPOSED SECURITY FENCING/BARRICADE RAILING FOR TOP OF WALL/SLOPE. 19 PROPOSED HYDRO SEED MIX PER LANDSCAPE PLANS 21 PROPOSED REVEGA TA 77ON AREA PER LANDSCAPE PLANS. ® PROPOSED DEPRESSED CURB PER PC/COT SO 209. 2' BENCH (TYPICAL) PROPOSED 6 LF CONCRETE WHEEL STOP PER DETAIL 5 SHEET 5. 16 Q PROPOSED THICKENED PAVEMENT EDGE PER DETAIL 8 SHEET 5. 3 BENCH FINISH GRADE SAME AS 2 FINISH GRADE TITLE REPORT NOTES FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, COND177ON OF TITLE REPORT No. AZ-FCOP-IMP-N/A-1-16-51005338, DATED 312312016. SEE PLAN VIEW SCHEDULE B ITEMS. FOR SLOPE B. TUCSON-FLORENCE HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY. DKT. 442, PG. 497 (SHOWN) TREATMENT C. INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT. DKT 2209, PG. 90 (BLANKET EASEMENT) 0. RESOLUTION OF ESTABLISHMENT. DKT. 5717, PG 971 (TUCSON-ORACLE ROAD TYPICAL CURB BENCH CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT, TERMINATED UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION) 9 E TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH LINES EASEMENT. DKT. 5813, PG 909 (DOES NOT AFFECT NTS SUBJECT PROPERTY) F. TUCSON GAS AND ELECTRIC EASEMENT. DKT. 5816, PG. 745 (SHOWN) G. TUCSON GAS AND ELECTRIC EASEMENT DKT. 5826, PG. 914 (DOES NOT AFFECT SUBJECT PROPERTY) H. GIFT DEED FROM PALO VERDE BAPTIST CHURCH INC. TO CANYON DEL ORO BAPTIST CHURCH INC. DKT. 6292, PG. 974. SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING: 1. PRIVATE INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT (UNDEFINED LOCATION) 2. PRIVATE SEWER LINE EASEMENT (UNDEFINED LOCATION) 3. 50 FOOT BUILDING SETBACK, U71LITY AND SEWER EASEMENT (SHOWN) 4. 20 FOOT UNDERGROUND U71LITY EASEMENT (UNDEFINED LOCATION) 5. EXIS7NG DEED RESTRIC77ONS OF RECORD, SHALL CONTINUE 6. TRANSFEROR SHALL MAINTAIN THE RIGHT TO A 15' CORRIDOR OF PROPERTY (UNDEFINED LOCATION) Z PRIVATE SIGN EASEMENT (SHOWN) 1. QUIT CLAIM DEED FROM FOOTHILLS WATER COMPANY (GRANTOR) TO CANADA HILLS WATER COMPANY (GRANTEE). DKT. 7935, PG. 1897 (BLANKET EASEMENT) J. DEED AND ASSIGNMENT OF EASEMENTS F007HILLS CABLE AND COMMUNICATIONS INC (ASSIGNOR) TO CANADA HILLS CABLE TV AND COMMUNICA 77ONS (ASSIGNEE). DKT. 7935, PG. 1899 (BLANKET EASEMENT) K. DEED AND ASSIGNMENT OF EASEMENTS F007HILLS CABLE AND COMMUNICATIONS INC (ASSIGNOR) TO CANADA HILLS CABLE TV AND COMMUNICATIONS (ASSIGNEE). DKT. 7935, - PG. 1906 (BLANKET EASEMENT) L. PUBLIC WATER EASEMENT. DKT. 12257, PG. 1114 (SHOWN) M. MEMORANDUM OF ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMP71ON AGREEMENT. QWEST WIRELESS LLC (ASSIGNOR) TO SPRINT SPECTRUM LP (ASSIGNEE). DKT. 12441, PG. 3974. (BLANKET EASEMENT) N. (NOT USED) 0. PRIVATE SEWER JOINT USE AGREEMENT. DKT 12696, PG 2483. (UNDEFINED LOCA71ON) P. PUBLIC WATER EASEMENT. DKT. 13149, PG. 5 (SHOWN) Q. PUBLIC WATER EASEMENT. DKT. 13149, PG. 8 (SHOWN) R. RESOLUTION OF ESTABLISHMENT. DKT. 12566, PG. 581 AND AMENDED, DKT 12761, PG. 242 (UNDEFINED LOCA 7TON) CURRENT CASE NUMBER: OV1600907 REF CASE NUMBERS: OV121502124 OV12-05-05 EEC 160061 U 4 t 0 NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLAN OVERVIEW: The Canyon Del Oro Baptist Church is located along the hill side of the Catalina mountain range. A master plan was previously submitted and approved and identifies the specific features on the site. A wash occurs along the southern portion of the site that is main drainage tributary from the Catalina mountain range. Slopes are gradual along the western portion of the site thru about the first half of the site with grade gradually increasing to the site east toward the Catalina mountain range. For these reasons, the master development plan identified the southern portion of the site and eastern half of the site as Natural Open Space and Significant Vegetation to remain undisturbed. These areas will remain undisturbed with minor revegetation occurring along the north bank of the existing wash that was impacted by previous site and utility improvements. Vegetation on site consists of the following species; foothill and blue paloverde, velvet mesquite, saguaro and barrel cacti, ocotillo, hackberry, wolf berry, creosote bush and varying underlining shrubs and grasses. Site soils consist of some rock out cropping bedrock, rock, and sediment material. The terrain and soil conditions will make salvaging more difficult. Plant material noted for salvaging shall be free of infestation with limited multi -trunk form. The previously approved native plant preservation plan dated June 16, 2005 (OV12-92-09) shall be omitted. This Native Plant Preservation, Salvage and Mitigation Plan shall be used for construction. The inventory and summary shall be reviewed and accepted by Town of Oro Valley staff prior to any site clearing. Any vegetation noted as significant vegetation that is north of the existing building and dirt parking lot will not be mitigated unless specific plants are noted as viable and transplantable per the approved native plant preservation plan. This is due to less than 12% of the significant vegetation is found in this area and per current code table 27-1, Mitigation of Significant Vegetation, only requires mitigation per native plant section mitigation if specimen is defined as viable and transplantable and is not salvaged. A small portion of the Pusch Ridge Christian Academy property will be impacted by this project, This is to allow better use of land and parking lot sharing between the two uses. We've identified the vegetation within this area and evaluated all specimens for viability and transplant -ability. The information is also contained within this document. No noxious or invasive species are visually prominent within the clearing limits. No special status including federally listed threatened, endangered species or highly safeguarded species of plant life were identified on this site. NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLAN NOTES: 1. Additional plants may be deemed salvageable by the zoning inspector, and shall be salvaged. 2. Any boxing prior to that time when the applicant may apply for a grading permit shall be approved by the planning and zoning administrator and will be performed at the applicant's own risk. GENERAL NOTES: 1. Mitigation and salvage plant material locations shall be shown on the landscape plans. 2. The developer shall replace salvaged plants that die during mitigation with the same size and species. 3. Any disturbance within the riparian habitat shall be mitigated in accordance with addendum i, riparian habitat overlay district, of the zoning code (zc). 4. Identify the ribbon colors used to tag the inventoried plants. Red = removed from site, blue = preserved in place, white = transplanted on site. 5. Only transplant on site (tos) plants will be tagged/flaged. 6. Clearing limits shall be provided with t-post and yellow rope flagging. No disturbance shall occur outside of these limits with out plan revision and Town of Oro Valley approval. NATIVE PLANT REQUIREMENTS FOR SALVAGED Sec. 27.6.b.4.c.3 1. Plant health is good to excellent with no major infestations or apparent diseases. "Plant health" is defined as a plant in sound state, free from disease and expected to survive for five or more years. 2. The plant is of a size and age to suggest a likely chance of transplant survival. 3. Plant is undamaged and is conducive to box or spade transplanting (upright branching). 4. Soils can be excavated, are cohesive, and appear capable of supporting a boxed or spaded root ball. 5. Surrounding topography permits access with the appropriate root systems or interfere with plant removal. 6. Adjacent plants do not pose a likely interference with root systems or interfere with plant removal. 7. The overall form and character is representative of the species and is a valuable specimen for landscape or habitat purpose. NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION, SALVAGE AND MITIGATION PLAN for CANYON DEL ORO BAPTIST CHURCH PHASE 3: NEW SANCTUARY xmfflmmm' 1 ,`1� NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SITE PLAN '° BK 14, PG 93 APPROVED BY: ����"419 PLA 8� ZONING ADMINISTRATOR - DATE ABBREVIATIONS: The following abbreviations were used in the comment column. Number in (#) refer to plant requirements for preserved in place or salvaged BL (3) broken limbs - tree has significant broken branches PROX (6) other vegetation in the vicinity will make salvage difficult TD (3) trunk damage - trunk has excavated at the base of the tree BD/ RD (3) base of saguaro has suffered rodent damage MU (7) multi -trunk, no single defined trunk LB (7) low branch, unable of preserving low branch for salvage or relocate DW (3) dead wood significant limb dieback IN (3) infestation of insect, damage to main limbs OT (1) old trunk ST (1) stunted trunk PD (7) prune damage MT (3) mistletoe infection of main limbs PF (7) poor form tree leaning or structure not supportive of vegetation LE (7) leaning sign of decline and poor health SL (5) slope - tree is on steep slope where salvage will not be possible SO (4) soils are loose and rocky, salvage will be difficult SR (4) surface roots are evident making excavation difficult SZ (2) size of the tree, either spread, caliper or height is not conducive to salvage VAND (7) vandalized - saguaro has been cut or chopped SIG Significant plant PIP Preserved in place TOS Transplant on site RFS Remove from site SAL Salvage - used during field inventory to identify trees that should be salvaged regardless of % requirements Scale - 1 "= 80' C I = 1' 0 40` 80' 160, 240' Scale: 1" = 80' IMPACTED VEGETATION SUMMARY Species Total Total Inventoried Transplantable Catclaw Acacia 3 0 Blue Palo Verde 2 1 Foothills Palo Verde 84 30 Velvet Mesquite 35 6 Desert Willow 1 1 IMPACTED CACTI SUMMARY Species Total Total Inventoried Transplantable Barrel Cactus 37 29 Saguaro 17 15 Ocotillo 2 2 Night Blooming Cercus 1 1 TOS PIP RFS 0 1 2 1 0 1 27 17 40 4 7 24 1 0 0 TOS PIP RFS 27 2 8 13 2 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 MITIGATION SUMMARY: 1. No additional mitigation will be required. The inventoried plant material that is removed from site do not meet the requirements for native plant preservation by the Town of Oro Valley. SIGNIFICANT VEGETATION MITIGATION Total RFS PIP Inventoried Foothill Palo Verde 5 4 1 Velvet Mesquite 1 0 1 Required tree Requied 36 748" box Understory 4/4 20 0 0 REF. CASE OV12-92-09, OV12-05-05, OV1502124 THIS PROJE( LOCATION MAP A PORTION OF SECTION 24, T-12--S, R-13-E GILA AND SALT RI VFR MERIDIAN, CITY OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA SCALE: 3"=1 MILE LINE LEGEND PROPOSED CONTOURS --�w� - - EXISTING CONTOURS -- - - — RIGHT-OF-WAY PROPERTY LINE - - ROAD CENTERLINE -- 100 YR FLOODPLAIN LINE PROPOSED WATER _-_--------- =------ ___-- PROPOSED SEWER NEW RIP RAP NEW SIGN — — -- — — — EXISTING EASEMENT _______-- u EXISTING GAS _._.... ;rt, _-------- Vv----- _--- J_____. EXISTING WATER EXISTING WATER METER EXISTING WATER VALVE _- _------- ,, _______ EXISTING SEWER \ EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE EXISTING PAVEMENT EDGE EXISTING CONCRETE EXISTING CURB F�%/ TEMPORARY HOLDING ►' NURSERY RIPARIAN HABITAT LIMIT OF CLEARING 100 YR FLOODPLAIN HATCH — — — — — — — — — EROSION HAZARD SETBACK NPPO LEGEND Transplanted on Site (TOS) Preserve in Place (PIP) E Velvet Mesquite Foothill Palo Verde O Blue Palo Verde 0 Catclaw Acacia O Saguaro • Barrel Cactus Ocotillo Desert Willow Cereus NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION KEY NOTES® 1. Property line 2. Natural open space - refer to previously approved native plant preservation, salvage, and mitigation plan, OV12-92-09 3. 100 year flood limit 4. Riparian habitat 'C' 5. 15' riparian clear zone 6. Limits of clearing 7. Temporary nursery 8. Erosion hazard setback SHEETINDEX 1, Native plant preservation, salvage and mitigation site plan 2. Native plant preservation, salvage and mitigation plan PERMIT SET ARC 15092 NATIVE PLANT INVENTORY: % I e � > NI 0 N 0 U) v 0 a 3 Lo, a_� z a) 0 i_ i C�.�) z 0 U j x c-) a 0 C) w Q 0 z U N Q) 1 0 U 0 Q U, 0 ZD U) Et Q) Q Z 0 NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLAN ABBREVIATIONS: The followingabbreviations were used in the comment t column. Number in (#) refer to plant requirements for res ry i e n ed lace or salvaged P P 9 BL (3) broken limbs - tree has significant broken branches PROX (6) other vegetation in the vicinity will make salvage difficult TD (3) trunk damage - trunk has excavated at the base of the tree BD/ RD (3) base of saguaro has suffered rodent damage MU (7) multi -trunk, no single defined trunk LB (7) low branch, unable of preserving low branch for salvage or relocate DW (3) dead wood significant limb dieback IN (3) infestation of insect, damage to main limbs OT (1) old trunk ST (1) stunted trunk PD (7) prune damage MT (3) mistletoe infection of main limbs PF (7) poor form tree leaning or structure not supportive of vegetation LE (7) leaning sign of decline and poor health SL (5) slope - tree is on steep slope where salvage will not be possible 4 SO O soil s are loose and rocky, salvage will be difficult SR (4) surface roots are evident making excavation difficult Sz (2) size of the tree, either spread, or caliper height is p g not conducive to salvage VAND (7) vandalized - saguaro has been cut or chopped SIG Significant vegetation PIP Preserved in place TOS Transplant on site RFS Remove from site SAL Salvage - used during field inventory to identify trees that should be salvaged regardless of % requirements Scale - 1 "= 40' Cl = 1' 77mm7mm7m�" � 111111111111111111111111111111111111W 0 20' 40' 80' 120' NATIVE PLAN T PRESERVATIO N KEY NOTES 1. Property line 2. Natural open sace - refer to previously approved native plant preservation, salvage, and mitigation plan, OV12-92-09 3. 100 year flo od ood limit 4. Riparian habitat 'C' 5. 15' riparian clear zone 6. Limits of clearing 7. Temporary nursery 8. Erosion hazard setback Scale: 1" = 40' NPPO LEGEND Transplanted on Site TOS Preserve in Place (PiP) Velvet Mesquite Cr Foothill Palo Verde 0 Blue Palo Verde 0 Catclaw Acacia O Saguaro • Barrel Cactus * Ocotillo * Desert Willow Cereus S ': t f I } ( I I , ) } i I I �� ; MMy. } LL 4 /yam E .� lE Ali _._ w.Z ..-- _____ U3 C1 < � l� , 0 1 0 _.._._. tfri�na-�Vaf: __. _._. _.__-__s-.. r Ic.r,.r'°„--T-,-i�r� _ _ ___ _ _... _ ...__MeA wpm RPS r___._ _ ___w_ _.W. _ _ __ ' - - -___ _1"_ _._..._::.. - r :.. .:.W_:_. .. } __.._ _ __�___ , I_ ___-____ _.-_._.•,___-__-_.__,-__.__.. ..._.-.__-_...-.,,.._.-_...-_._.,_-._._ ......., ..,__.... -.__..__.. .. .. ' 16 Parkinsonia micrci�th im Foe�thills Pad Vi- I 4 $ ' h ° rh9 oxlso TOS _. 117 Parkmsonia mfiq! �}y.lum Foothills Palo Verde 3 - �,. i h t ; dw/sia IMPS ----.--- ._»_...... _-...__.-.._._..-.--..___.G..._..._..w....... ........._-- .-_.-_.._....-,.,-.--.--..-•-__•-.•{_-.----i.-_..... 11 19 ! Chi'i sis tinearis Desert Willow 16r _r...__, d-...«......,_...,._..._-._.,«.....-:.._..._..,..._..__. i h h : �, .. ...........». i TOS _ __._, _._. __.___._... -_. _.. ____, - y-_.._..:__ -._.... I i9 iFouguWna splendens ;Ocotila t €i { - . �_. _ .: __. i m ;r u __-......_..._ ITC S ___- .-'L-. - , .__-.-..__-. ___-_.----__r-,_ 120 , Parkinsonla rnicra» Er {LL��rn ; Ft hills Palo Verde 4 8 _»_._a_ - _ __. i.-.__.---�-_------•_...,.�___., p__1 �.____ _.___.__� __ _ h ` rn TOS 1-- - .._._.... _ _- ._.._._._._.,-.._-__.._,...y.___Y�-___..`. f 21 Prosopis veiu Velanet lVlesqurta - I. '_-'__'•-_-...._t___......._._._..w.�._.:n.........rn_..�:.._.._:._ m szrfr_.__.._._ ..-...... P' _ ._5..'12 ._ _. 22 Parlcinsoht1.11111-a micro_ phy m Foothills Palo Verde - 6 " __.� _1 i m m-lb/Imu . __.4 ; TC)S _ t23_ , Parkinsonia microphyl m Foothill Palo Vile i 14 - m I Ib/sz/S01si RFS t :. I i 24 i Fcactus wislizenil - ___-_- ___._.._.____ __.-._.._...._._ .__ __. _ Barrel Cactus_.. _a ,._...: ___ I _. _ h h ; }TOS. 25 F Fwocactus wislizenil ; Barrel Cactus 1 2 rn ; - lelbd RFS Zvi ,Fervocactus wislizenil IBarrelCactus ` 2 " - y_.._v... '---._----- ,-%`,' ---""- -_. ___....:_______.._ i. : l h _ .. TOS .._ .. ... _........... ... ._.., _...... _.._ _.._..� _:..._ .: .:e_.__�. ..-.._-. ....... . ..,.._.. -. ____..._i..+:....r-3n«..--.-.M..,.. ..,. _..._.;-... 27 ; Parkinsonia micrpPhYsm I Foothills Palo Verde 4 - trt F ' �It I TOS _ _.._. 'Velvet Mesguite ` 4 - 120 Prosools velum .__ 1 x. .. __. h rn 'I-CZS 7 r _ ._. .�___.. __. _ _.._ .... 'Prasopis velurta Mesquite 1t} - 4_____.__ rn E , rriu/Eblrtrn+ . __ -. i RFS _ __ ___1t ,- _ _ ___-- _- __�___.___..-__w-------_ 30 iCame ea Gi nta `Sa uertr 9 0 lh =' h .__..___ 7OS _.__ ________.___I_ ___._ __ .. __. _ r_ 31 jCamegiea manta_ !Saguaro ; S 4 __ - _.---_.___.._-_.-_-._._ I h TOS _ #Parkinsonia rrhlcr _ Alum .Fvothrs Palo Verde $ I - Y..-_.._,_--_.-__-w_.-.__ _h _.4 - �_... wW M rrh 1 ;f1J/dw/soRFS �......_._ _32 ____ _ __� ._.-.__.__. __ .__..___ 3 F�erocactus wisslizenii N {Barrel Cactus 2= - ,____ + _.___�.. _._.....____.._.-.____ __ __... h h T 1 34 !Ferocactus wislizen ';Barrel Cactus 1 1 i - _-...___: _ _._._ __..._._ . __ _-._._.____._._._ :.__: h h _5 TOS y _... 35 Prosopis velutina Mew Mesquite 8 __:_ .... ,.._-.,--._..._ ... 1 I 1 rnuldwI h/se RFS 0. ! � ; 36�1Feiucactus wislizenn ;Barrel Cactus 2 - _ - _ i ! kel d _.. N -RFS _ ... -------- ' 37 +Garnegiea_G�ic,�__ nta- _ Saguaro :; 2 ; i 9 #� I Fi •-___._•d _-_-•. i TES Z---_---F _ .' ...___._-__�-___.._.-.-,..........._.,._ .__. ___.___.__.._,._.__.___•-__._._.__ .x - I'arketnson mtcrFoothibs Pala Verde ; 8 - i f I Ib/td+ini'so __._..._-... RFS 39 PhaFonia rrciyllum Foathillls Palo Verde 3.?_ _t. _9 -- _: - - - - �rxl k `Eb/so/sr w _ _�_ ;-- - - RFS 40 Parkirmonia iWkwp ► �? Foothills Palo Verde } 41 Ferocactus wislizeniI Barrel: Cactus � 1 ti - ---._:. ._-..._ ... _..____ _.....__• .___.._.-...... m I F so(Sr ! h h RFS TOS . ,_...'._-- ___.___. _.__.-_ 3.... :_--..... 42 ,Pah�kii<hsonia rhhiue t Ihy.turn ,Foothills Palo %bale 4 - ---4--_-_....._... ._.T__._...... _ I._ __.:_-. �:. v....__..:_ ..�.. m ; f Iso/lb/td ...: ...._ ... TOS «. r. ... 43 F.Acacia �greggn _._____ __._ _ _. Catclaw Acacia ; 15 - t - _ .------ .. __.__ _-.-_.. , 1 m i I � sztproxffb/mt I._ . t ___ i_, --.._-- , _ .. _R.. RFS 44'�lParkinsonia microphylium. iFoothills Palo Verde ... 8 - m /sa/' a RFS ,_,___. _�.._.._ .._..-____. -_.. _ ___ _ __ .. 45 }Pafi�onia micro hyllum ,Foothills Palo Verde 30 ° - t._..__" ... _.._.__ _.__. _ 1 _._ __ .__._ ___ . _.. h . I . uti�y eziprox/solsig PF _ _ ...... -.__. _..._. .._ _.- ... 4fi I i omeactus w�lizenii !Barrel Cactus 12 - .. ........ ........ ... ... .........__...... ....., h , h ' ._.._ ............ TOS i ; �r F ._____ _� _ 9uj} t7Ci arp . 1Tr : _ �. . l bd i r%1 '. 71Y:]/i_IQI�.,.- .�. 1 RFS 48_ Parkinsonia microoyllum ;FoothiNs .. .Z _ 49 IParklnsonia microphyllurn Footftrlis Palo Verde 6 4 - .- _ _ .__. m t s RFS-. i 5�t3 Parkinsonla microphyllum Foothh�s Palo 1 rde 8 - -.-_-_.__.- Gn � l i triuisaflb/�tv -� i�f=S �_... _��..-. _ .. _.._ _____,'__1... _..._.. tl� _._ ..._.., 51. 'Ferocactus wislizenii Barrel Cactus 12 = - I..._ ! M._.�.�_....,�._...Y-... :. _ ._ h ' h � . TOS .. _. ___ ___ _....._._ ._ ._.-.-_ _-_._.._, � __ ._ i 52 I Ferocactus vwis lizernr 'Barrel Cactus s ` 2! t _::__ _._._,____:_ _..._._ h h : ..... _... TOS ___. I -- 53 Ferttcacius vuisfizenii Barrel Cactus 2 l ? felbd RFS . 54 # Ferocactus vv%ltzenu ,Barrel Cactus 2 - w___ _____ _ : h h i double ��:..___ y TOS a� 515 Pa insonia mlcr tyk r pothi�s Palo Verde 3 ' - -__.._._ ... _..„ -_ t _.__._ rrh ; m imulsollb TOO, ___._. �.___.__ } _ __..___.. ,Parlcinsania i icr. yff 3F oodhllls Palo Verde 3 I - _«._ �__._s____.._... :__ ll ; t>« rrt 'so/li _._ .. _-. TOS _ ` 57 TPe'rltatsonia _rnicr_iophyl m Foothills Palo Verge 4 - - . 1 m 41 f ;s+olmuflb- TOS S F._._...: 58 iParrlSuhson� rnicctyiktm ;Foothills Palo Veerde , 3 .... .. , m . I }So/mullo/pic IFS i..__+___---___ ._______ . -. -. ..,_ -...._ 59 Parkinsonia rnic rophyllum. ,Foothills Palo Verde ; 4 - _.- -_. .____.. _. m I so/dw TQ$ i___.._ __....._-.____ _-._.«_ ____ ___ _.___._ __.__t__-..._.. - --- 60 . Parkirisonia mrcrophyllum Foothills Palo Verde 3 ; - - -___.-_-_.__ _--.._.-__.___-.----- - m , m 'sollb RFS 61 lPa onlo~mrcrophyllum Foothi is Palo Verde 6 - m , I :Ymu/sv/slw _I RFS ' 62 =Pr+oseprs velubna Velvet Mesguite 4 E - __. I i F l rn/ach/dint i RFS ._ __._. _. __.__. . _._ ,.... _._ . 63 Ferocactus wiskzenii' Barrel Cactus 1 - �_...____ _ k h tt i . I TOS _--_ _.__ _________- _ _- - __- _-_ _-- _______-_ ti -__ __ 64 , Parkinsonia micropthyA t Foothiks. P> to Verde : 3 - _______ ___----_-�__�___.____________ ___._ .__,_-_�..._ -_ - -- - - ----- - -- -- - .._.. __r..__. :m = .1 i s kb scr IFS_ ___-Is_.____r______--_--_ _--_----__-.-__ 65 iFerocactus vvistizene Barrel Cactus 1 - _._ .I -___-. _ _. __ _ .. __ _ .-_-- h ; h ;TOS 66: ,F tcactus wrs:lizenii Barret Gaols ;' 1 ; - h. h f TOS __.._ _ -_ __ ' 67 Ferocactus wislizenir Barrel Cactus . 2 i - _. _.- m I , lo/bd __ ___ t RFS - - .. _ ._-.. ... .. _ r ,_ _ . 88 !Prosopis velurha Velvet Masque 8 - -.. . ', I I salstctw/mt 1 I PIP _ 69 Prow s velutina _ _ . _ . _ .. _Velvet Mesquite _ _3 - 1.--- _I- __ _.�---..-_._ _...,__ ... _ ...__-__ 70 Ferocactus wislizenir ,Barrel Cactus 1 - h h zTt`3S t_ _ .._- --.-. _-_. --- - _. _ ._...._._ ,_._ ___ 71 Parkinsonia micrttphylkulrn Foothills Palo Verde 3 - -.___,_.._.______ ._ ___.� - ---, ,� :__.-- _....-__.t i rri m so _ l TOS I....... „..,.„ ....._w.......-..:.?--..• I -__ w _. _... M_� _ ______ Prc>scrpis vekc: Mesquite - _ _ __.__ ,.,:�,...-____ _;.__ ... ._._..__�.___ I f soimu/lbldwCm _ ..w.. RFS _.__..... _ ..Valve# _ _ _, .t0 73 'Parki .___ __ macrophylltrrrt 'Foothills Palo Verde 4 - .,,. -.-__� _ _-. __. _-..__ --___. ...._..- _ _.__ 74 1Parkinsonet rnicrofahylIum Foothills Palo Verde 6 : - _.... __ _. _ - . I m , m `ib/so _ _ _...___ _,_ _ ._ -.._. ._ , I l ax lb/sa : __.. _. _. __ PIP PIP . �._.._._w __. _.. _ .__.. _ ._ _ _. . _ _..__.._ ..__ 5 Cairnegiea Gth ,saguaro ; i0 t ..... -Lit- -.-_-__ .__.. __ _ --. __w_I., -- , h h ._,.__....... P' _.:._ __ _. - ,.._. 76 Parkinsonia micro Fvothlls Palo Verde 6 ' - __ n] = I 8itl Idw - f .. I P ' .... _ -- -:__ _...�,t_� _,_._. ___T _ -. --. �_._.w_...._v...... _ { 7711 Rarkinsonia micraophyflum .foothills Palo Verde 4 - .--,__ _. �..�_...- _ -- .- _ - -, __.._ _ '; m I sollb .. ._..-.. 1 RFS �__..._ _ . .__— .._._ __ .__ �. _ 7t3 l Paddrsonta microphyllum foothills Palo Verde 8 ; m l sollb/dw I PF 79 Ptatic nsortia rnicrophytlurn .Foothills Pab Vaiiie 4 - rh? , t so/pf/W _._. ,RFS _ _...-"--_....._._ _ .__ _ ___. _-.__ . ___.___ ....__._ _.. _-._. ,._ _ _ ..__ 80. ,Fatocactus wisiizenii :Barrel Cactus 2 - ? h ; h.. r____.._.,._w__--_ ..._ ... __-____..__._.-_ _ .__ _.--.-.._-..._.,_ .. _...... _, .__..-_-_-r____ _._._. . ITOS 11 81 1Pmsopis veiutina Velvat.MesC trite '12; - i t'>rt I .1� l(Wsz/so ;RFS _._1___,_____. ___ .. __. _--_.___ _ . _. ___,._.. ._ _ -_ _4-.__-.._ __. _�.__ ..- -. _ _.-.. _. _ .. _... _ .._ 82 =Car negiea G_ Saguaro 12 i 5 rn, l C sa/#holos/bd __. _..__-. I RFS A 83 'Parkinsonia micro h . urn ;Foothills Palo Verde 3 > - i` ( m i m lsofb I O 3T _a __ tP `son' _.__ ......__ _ !.._. mior._ um Foothills Palo Vt:rde 10 - }._- . ; m I dw/sstltd i RFS ._..._ _ . . �.. ..,_ _._... _.... _...__,._.,1.._ # 1 86Parkinson microphyilum : Foothill Pai© Verdi 4 -% ___. .. _._..__. _ _ _._. w.....- __ -.._ .....: . _ _ ... I I dw rox _ ..-- - --_.. RFS _,. i__.___..._ 86 ;Proscr ars v++elu a 'velvet Mesquite a - m , m, Idwlso ITOS ------___ Y6 I. ___ 8.7 , Parkinsonia micro urn. ; Foothills Palo `4 ards 4 i - ._.___ m ' rrh i so _ TOS 88 °Prosopis velu'tma `Velvet Mesquite 10 ; k:..-..... - -,-- .... _. .._._..-._......_.... ._._. _,......_.... _ . ,__ - .-. -.-- m I 1 Iblsoldw ._ ....,.__._ ..__.-__ ; RFS 89Feioca+cti �.. - wislizenit 18arrel Cactus i fir... _ ._ _ . ih 1 h ; I TOS __,___..-____.__ _ . , ___. _,___ _ _ _.�-___----------- _,..,__<i - m .....,.,.-.,... -. _ ..,.a.._ { f 1. 9 9 t. ! 3 i f }. } 1 ; 1 I- ; - �� " F O (. f I = 9 ` E ,E o ' * a ,`le 0 E = I sue. E a= ¢p r � e �N •tic , ` E o 9f?Carneglea Giganta » =Saguaro _.. 6 D h ; TOS .. _ _ ' 91 Parkmsonta micro _trm ;Foothills Palo Verde P . 5 - I _-. m ` . soEfb `PIP i 92 ,Prosopis velutina IVelvet Mesquite . .- ..... .- - , 4 _} m 1 � - _ so/dw i PIP t 3 93 }Ferocaclus wislizenii ;Barrel Cactus --- I------------ -94 1 .; : h 1 h .- . . '; PIP Parlunsentia micropfhyllum Foaftls Palo Verde ; - - - . _ - . ,Pr+osopis 6 - " m } m ;... td/so I = PEP I 95 velutina VelvetMesqude 8I - ' m , I :lb/mu/dw ;PIP s 196 ; Parkinsonia micro hyllurn !Foothills Palo Verde 7. 4 - ' m I I P rox/sollb RFS : _ - _ -. ......_. _P_ .. «_ _... 97 yCarnegiiaa Gi�rnta uaro - 7 0 h I h - _.. , TOS i 98 €Prasopiisvetu#ina 1:... C 12' ? 1 I ;dw/mu/nd ..i_ IRFS1 . _,'VelvetMes�qulte i �98 :Parkinsonia microphyllum_ {Foothhills Palo Verde .. .. 4 rn s m _ .... . ...... ... .. ... so .....- '. Pip t100Ferocactus wislizenil Barrel Cactus 2 i #� . h :.. . s ; _.____._.... -. ___,-_. ....._.. .. .... 101 {Parkinsonia rnibrophy!lurth 'Foofi- Hs Palo Verde 3 rr1 + I st/so b/d�v RFSI 10.2 # Parkinsonia mime tlum Foothills Palo Verde 10 . i. € CYi m _ : so ,. ., ; TOS' ,.1- __ ,Acacia dreg ai Catciaw Al aria _. 6 .1. m :. 14o/lb/dw . ; RFS .. 1,111-7_17-1.. ''t�4lPrasoPis velutina Velvet I 1-Mesquite 6 : m ' I . .sollb/dw RFS; :1051Prosop veluti9 ;Velvet Mesquite 4 ; m : 1 dwiso/td I RFS' ._ .- 1A6'Ferocactus wrsl�erhii iBarrel Cactus 1 t.i h1. _ . ;TOS ;1Q71ParEcinsonla rophyflumFoothills Palo Verde . _.. 12 - m ; I so/muldw &S ; .... ...- '1i38 Priosopis velutina ,Velvet Mesquite ; _. � -. .. 4 }_ ,. .. ! , _. ._ .. lb/dw1.lsolm a . , PEP 1�9rlParkmsonia mtbritplhrflum „Foothills Palo Verde ._. _ _ _ - w_ .. ........... . .s..... 110° Pros t1eEv+et Me ilea , 3 10 ' 1- i m i::mu/io . m .I .. PIP , s velutina i-- --_-�..._. `. -... .. __._ _ .... - ; . t ! �/td/dw I RFS 'Ii1,Carnegiea Gicgant�i......., __.. Saguaro. , . 4 0 : :� h 3 b ' TOS' <'112Prctsopts velutina !�I,alvetl�Aes4uite 4.... 4 n� rn dwlsca/dkEd :TOS .-.. �.: 31 arl _.sonic ilarida iBiue Pala Verde __.. ...,.._. _..... _ .. s _.. _.Y........ .-, - _... _ 4 rn F m �._ _. -. .. soldw . :TOS - i114iPros is velutina ;Velvet Mesquite ... 4 - .... . m' m _,._ � _ . M1 Avv/so ' PIP x__ __ �_.:-. ._.... _ _._-_ .--.-----_-_ -...- .. .. i 115 f 'arkmsania mtcro h um Foothills Pala Verde 6 .. .. _ I _ lb1m also R 116 `Parkinsonia mlcr rrh ! Fooftls Paloo Verde : 4 ;, _; I M ` I ._ .m_. : so/bld ..... PIP I 17 Cad tag da�G ants Sal uaro..�...._..._. 2 w; 0 , h $ h P '..I .... _ __. _ -..._,.., 1118 i Parkmsonia microphyllurn Foothills Palo Verde 5 m 1.m _______1_____._._ , so, . ,.. pip r .. a, -_. __ - _: . €119;Parkinsonia M , Alum .Foothills Palo Verde f 6 ' ,.___ 1 120; - = m , I so/sl -_._-_ _ _._ __.__-_.-.__ .. P!F I. .0 Parktns+onia m cr+o'hvilf ,FooI i0s Palo Verde ' �..... ._ I121 Pros is velutina-„ 'Velvet Mesquite 8 ! 8 ; - m I - < ; I { I .so/lb/st . _dw/muAb P!P ` PIP F `.122 Parkinsonia micro�hyltum Palo Verde ' t. 3 , ,_ ..,. m m so ._ _ .. TOS �Foothl(ls _ _. _ 1 123 Parkinsonia microphyllium 'Foothills Palo Verde . -, 10 - -._ . � m 1 Iblmu/dw , i RFS: 12y411 Ferocacius wi_slizenji Barrel Cactus : 2 - I h I TOS . i25iFerocactus w'rsI¢ehti Barrel Cactus } 2 . ). , I m : 1 .ih bd i RFS _.. __.-.... _ ..-.....__,. .. .. 1261'arkinsonta fi+arida ____ _ ,Blue Palo Verde 8 - ; m I Ib/dwfp# , €IFS; 127iPt rkinsonr __ __ - ,._ '_..__....,...... . __ 128IFeroc t s. w sl zarui IBarrel Cactus :_.. I ... - 1. _ h h �. ; TOS `12!9-iParkdnsonia rr #Ium 1,Foothilts Palo Verde 12 - m l :mUdwlsoidw _ _ ._1. RFS: 130 Proso is velutina ;Velvet Mesquite ._..1-_ _ P ....-.1-- _. __., _ _ ... _ ....._ 4 i - t I - dw/lb/mu/so I RFS. r____ 931,Prosopis velutina Velvet Mesquite 192 - , , m . I td/mtldwfib # RFS Z.._ .-. , ..... .._.s,._ . ...... _... ._._. 132Parkinsonia mic ? i phyHum ,Foothills Palo Verde ; + 3 - 1 l ; t td/dwfin/so RFS f331 Parlansonia rnicrophyllum Foothills Palo Verdes ' 8 I - m i I tb/drr/se t RFS .. _._ 1134' Prose is velutna Velvet Mesquite . . _.., .. 6 i - ,. I 1 dw/so/st/td ` RFS 135;Parkinsvnia miicirophyllum ;Foothills Palo Verde 6 m : rn so1. `TOS11 ._ 136 Parkinsonia mlEcrop.� m j oo.. ,Is Pala Verde 30' � m I , ..... mu/Ib/dwtsz/sick _ . , ;RFS '137 `Ferocactus v0slizenii ?Barrel Cactus ; _ ..... 2 - h f h . JOS t __ _ __. _ . _ ..._.. _ _ _ _ 138;Ferocactus wislizenil IBarrel Cactus . ;. 2 .. , . h h . , TOS . . ,_ _- -.- _ -_.._. a..- .-__ ._,. . _..-_...... .. ..:. ... : 1139}Parkinsonia microphylfum Foothills Palo Verde 12 - m I -soAb/dw/td = RFS ,._. ... -.-- _ . _ _ __.... ._ - .._ _, a._. .._._ _ .. ..._ 140 Proso is velutina Velve1.t Mesquite :_._ _ ..._- -- .__ P . .. _-..... _ 4 . m I :soAb/mu RFS :141;Fouquieria splondens iOcotiilo 8 h h 'TOS' L_. _ . - - -. _ _ i 142,Parkinsonia mlcrophyllum Foothills Palo Verde .__.._- _.-._ - _. _. _ _ _ ._ .._ _... _.. , 6 .; - . ; m m Ib/so/dw TOSF 143 } Ferocactus wislizenil : Barrel Cactus Z `: - h i h ' double ' TOS :1�44 i Parkinsonia mio trim t Foothills Palo Verde ; 8 - 1 m 1 sollb/dw RFS 1413 F f�srio- onia .. ., h ilium 'Foothills. Palo Verde .._�_.,__ fh - ' m s t } so/dw RFS ; r.,w ..____.. _ __ .. _.. 1446 Carnegiea Giganta ,Saguaro � 8 0 h i h TOS _m. ._ M , .. �u_. .. _.�.___,_ __ _, ..-. ___-....__� .... ,- - ... 144 `iCamegrea Giganta» ,Saguaro .. .. 6 _ 0 I h : h li ETOS .. .. _ .. :148 Ferocactus wislizenn Barrel Cactus ...: i . ; .. , .. h > h . ; . TOS' �,,....,._ __..a_._��. ,-__ ..�._�.,.__ __- ___. j._..._...._ .M __... '' 149 `. Ferocactus wislizenfi i Barrel Cactus . 1 - _... t h h TOS i 150 3 Parkinsonia rtrt ro 1lum i Foothills Palo Verde ' i p I l I irriVso/dw i RFS 4151IParklnsoniarritcrohllurn iFoot .. ._.. ___ . , 11521Feroc-actus wislizenil ;Barrel Cactus 2 t I ' I .. . lelbd .RFS �.._- -. .. _ ..».� __.,��.�,.,.-_-__-_; ._.___ _.1. __.._...__. r,.,_-_... 153 Prosopis veluna ;Velvet Mesquite 1- ; - 8 ' i.i.1. .___y-..-�--I,_---_ - i 1 -_ tdb/acdw/hilt !RFS': '134IP-ros is velutina Velvet Mesquite 6 - ; m 1 1 irnu/so/dw111. RFS ....- .... 155 i Pa�rlfirasonia micrth Foothills Palo Verde .. 6 ; m to : dwltci/mu 1 TOS 156 Carnegiea Gi....... 5 0 h h ` TOS. SSagro _...- _.._.._ _ .....�.. _ _ 1571Carnegtea G� r #a Saguaro . > 2 ' . D ,_ . .. h i h .. ' , TOS' _...... 1SS Carnegisa Giganta ISaguaro, . 5 4 z h h , �TOS' i i5;3 . ocactus wislizenii ;1.Barre Cactus ; 1 : h i h ' i 1805Parkinsonia micropfhyllum Palo Verde 5 ' - _ m 1 lb/so/dw ;RFS: 1.Foothills 161 °Prosops velutina ,Velvet Mesquite 8 '� - ' m I adw:AbAn RFS .. ._ __ .._ ._. -____.:_ _ _._ _ -_ . _. . ,182 Pro.711so is velutina „Velvet Mesquite a - m I ib/dw/in ; RFS' 1163 I Ferocactus wrslrzenli ' Barrel Cactus i. _ w _-.. _, _ .._--_._ ...__._ .. .... ...__ 2 - , h , h I ,.- ... . .. . TOS !'1641Prosopis velutina _ ....__. ;Velvet Mesquite � _. _.. _.. 8 - m I dwhdFrn/so i RFS: 1£rS Parlctnsorna rnlcraph rtlum FoathEAs Palo Verde - ... __-._- _. ___.. .._ . _. 4 . _ I m n^t .. . so ' TOS ! le 1 I-ariiin r�nia micro yllum Foothills Palo Verde 1 3 - < m l Ib/1e/so .RFS' -.. ,-.. . 1167 i Faroe actus wis fizenii Barrel Cactus1. 1 h h , i TOS :1. 1168 I Parkins prime mtorcphyllui !Foothills Palo Verde $ i - m ; t ; so/tla/dw i TQS �_._ ___ __ 1'69iParkinsonia rrtio 11urn Foothills Palo Verde ;. 8 - .. ' m rn so ITOS { } ... ._- _1..-_.__.__ ._ _. ___m1�_- _ _ _1 _.. _...._. ipfi L'I ark rstariia microphyllum ;Foothills Palo Verde -_-.. 8 ,. m m so/lb • <TOS- _._ _. _ ,._ . .-. _ . _ . _ ..1.s17'IsPfosopisvelutina Velvet Mesquite i..«:..m..w.G.vww...............,.........».._................... _____.-.--....... __-___.r... ...,_..-.... _._..-'F.r» ........... _.. 8 imI I ... -.... r..._. ;in/rd/td/dw/so - _ ...._-.-- .. _ . _ .._..... !RFS __.._ I172 Padm- sonic microphy#lurrt ;Foothills Palo Verde 6 m ; I ib/mu/so i RFSi I.m.... a _ _ _. 173 Parkins�onia nlaro kfum Foothills Palo Verde 10 - i m I _.. lb/so/td/dw : -.. . RFS Y-- - - -... _ .._ M . _ ..... - - _.. _- 174, Pa Wnsonia r tcirophylium !Foothills Palo Verde 6 . .., .... , . m 'F; I P %x/so PIP - _. _ _..-_ __1 _ __ i75 Parkxtnia rricr lam ;Foothills Palo Verde 5 - . , ._ m i...l .'lo/so ; .PEP - - _. - - _r._. __�.._ . _._ - _.. i176IPlarkinsor is rnicroph turn :Foothills Palo Verde : 8 v m' I isl/so PIP _• _-'d'.-.-.-_.-.__-____- .........__-_...,._. _. ._.. _.. _.. , _- _....... « ... _... 177,Ac.acia a it Catelaw Rcacia 6 - . ; :. _- ....... m ' I .. .... . . tb/dwlso . I PEP 178 4 Parksorhia miciropfityilum Foothills Paler Verde 8 } m ; inn ___ _____ ____ _ _ so ; F PEP ' -- __- ---- - - ,... .-.._.. _....--- -- FR ,Carnegiea Giganta_._...__ . Saguaro ,- 8 : --__;- 0 - r h h ....- _1-1-..------- . - __.. ; ITOS _ .. FR Fermcactus wislizenii Barrel Cactus 1 i . [ RFS; . _. - Carnefea Giants _w. xSuaro . ,_ 1 _ 0 _! _ul. ,.. h 3 t TOS 4 Ni ht Bloomin Ger. ' FR Pentocexeus cregcit.._ . 9.. € ,._..ry . 1 ' j m m td - TOS . REF. CASE 002-92-09, OV12-05-05, OV1502124 PERMIT SET ARC 15092 It I L _ I I- .")w....� � ...._,y, CHKD BY ..... .. -- V V I V V V ✓ V / -A INO DATE REVISION BY CH APPR'EXPIRES 9/30I2 I PLAN NO.