The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPackets - Council Packets (1774)Town Council Meeting Regular and Study Session February 1, 2023 Town Council Meeting Announcements Upcoming meetings Meetings are subject to change. Check the Town website for meeting status. Historic Preservation Commission Feb. 6 at 5 p.m. Hopi Conference Room Planning and Zoning Commission Feb. 7 at 5:00 p.m. Council Chambers Town Council Regular Session Feb. 15 at 6 p.m. Council Chambers 4 Town Council Meeting Regular and Study Session February 1, 2023 Public Hearing: Proposed Surf-thru Car Wash Conditional Use Permit and Architecture February 1,2023 6 Purpose Public Hearing: Proposed Surf-thru Car Wash Item A: Conditional Use Permit Car Wash 5,500 sq. feet On-site vehicle stacking Item B: Architecture Discussion and possible action 7 Subject property 8 9 Background and history Approved 2007 10 Item A –Conditional Use Permit Item A –Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Proposed Car Wash 5,500 sq. feet Vehicle stacking (34 cars) on-site Covered vacuum stalls CUP review criteria Public health, safety and welfare Reasonably compatible with surrounding uses Consistent with the General Plan Hours of operation Convenience use and vehicle wash review criteria Number, timing, location Water conservation 11 Item A –Conditional Use Permit Criterion 1 -Public Health/Safety/Welfare Noise Noise study Building location Over 900 feet from future apartments Over 1,100 feet from nearest residential Separated from residential and State Park by Water Harvest Way, Oracle Road or CDO Wash Orientation 12 Item A –Conditional Use Permit Unusual volume/character of traffic On-site vehicle stacking Condition to address existing area traffic Criterion 1 -Public Health/Safety/Welfare 13 Item A –Conditional Use Permit Criterion 2 –Reasonably compatible with surrounding uses Vacant site within existing Oro Valley Marketplace Adjacent to Oracle Road Near In-N-Out Burger Future retail/restaurant uses Distance from residential and State Park Separated from residential and State Park by Water Harvest Way, Oracle Road or CDO Wash 14 Item A –Conditional Use Permit Criterion 3 –Consistent with the Goals/Policies of the General Plan Scenic beauty and environment Viewsheds Permitted building height: 39 feet Proposed building height: 32 feet Approximately 15 feet below Oracle Road Oracle Road Scenic Corridor Manage growth Water conservation Criterion 4 –Hours of operation Code required 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. Item A –Conditional Use Permit Convenience use criteria Number within a center Access Timing of development Location Reduction from 500 ft. to 420 ft. Vehicle wash criteria Building design Water conservation –70% Reduced from ~12,100 gallons/day to ~3,600 gallons Approximately equivalent to water usage of a small restaurant 15 Item B –Architecture Proposed building ~5,500 square feet Max. building height: 32 feet Design elements Varied roof and wall planes Approved colors and materials (OV Marketplace Master Architectural Design guidelines) Desert hue Rock veneer Tile Roof 16 Item B –Architecture 17 Surrounding Architecture Summary and recommendation Surf-thru Car Wash Item A –Conditional Use Permit Item B –Architecture Planning and Zoning Commission recommends conditional approval of Item A and approval of Item B 18 Surf Thru Car Wash Oro Valley Town Council Hearing January 30, 2023 EVOLUTION OF THE SITE PLAN Site Plan MAXIMUM STACKING INTELLIGENT WATER USE ATTRACTIVE ARCHITECTURE Building Elevations Material/Color Scheme RENEWABLE ENERGY VALUABLE SERVICE TO THE COMMUNITY Thank you for your consideration of this item tonight! Town Council Meeting Regular and Study Session February 1, 2023 Proposed Changes to Private Recreation Area Requirements in the Zoning Code February 1, 2023 Focus on private recreation areas Purpose Lambert LaneAthletic Field Oro Valley Parks and Recreation Needs Assessment and Master Plan Need for larger parks in Oro Valley Strategic Leadership Plan (SLP) objective “Review Town codes related to recreation amenity requirements for residential subdivisions and recommend updates that will prioritize larger neighborhood area parks and amenities as outlined in the Parks and Recreation Needs Assessment.” Revise Zoning Code to meet SLP objective for private parks Key findings and solutions to meet SLP objective Discussion and feedback Process Lambert LaneAthletic Field Present Zoning Code changes to Town Council -TBD Present Zoning Code changes to Planning and Zoning Commission -TBD Present Zoning Code changes to PRAB -TBD Code drafting Town Council feedback for potential Zoning Code changes –February 1, 2023 Planning and Zoning Commission feedback for potential Zoning Code changes – September 6, 2022 PRAB feedback for potential Zoning Code changes –August 16, 2022 Staff research and identification of key issues and potential solutions We are here Research Oro Valley Zoning Code Oro Valley Parks and Recreation Needs Assessment and Master Plan Private recreation area size and amenity requirements and amenity inventory Oro Valley Pima County Sahuarita Tucson Marana Flagstaff Peoria Goodyear Phoenix Scottsdale Cave Creek Gilbert Cottonwood Fountain Hills Trust for public land Discussion and feedback from PROS Consulting and Oro Valley Parks and Recreation Director Initial discussions with homebuilders HOA outreach to come Key findings Finding #1: Private recreation spaces can be consolidated. Finding #2: Private parks greater than ¼-acre have more recreational value. Finding #3: Required private recreation area size can be increased. Finding #4: More meaningful amenities can be required. Finding #5: Can require more meaningful amenities in multi-family residential developments and simplify recreation area requirement. Ina Rd. Finding #1: Private recreation areas can be consolidated Finding:There is no mechanism to consolidate private park areas which can result in smaller, scattered parks. Proposed standards to create larger private recreation spaces Consolidate private recreation areas unless there are special circumstances. Require new adjacent subdivisions to share private recreation areas. Private recreation areas should be no more than a ½-mile, or 10-minute walk from all residents. Villages at SilverhawkeAlterra and Valley Vista Ina Rd. Finding #2: Private parks greater than ¼-acre have more value Finding:Private parks greater than ¼-acre have more recreational value. Proposed standards to require in-lieu fees instead of small parks Private parks smaller than ¼-acre must pay an in-lieu fee to support public parks. Private parks larger than ¼-acre must provide recreational area with limited opportunities to use in-lieu fee subject to Town Council approval. Lower Value Private Park Higher Value Private Park Finding #3: Required recreation area size Finding:Oro Valley’s private recreation area size requirements are low compared to some other Arizona jurisdictions. Proposed standards to increase minimum private recreation area size requirement For new developments without a rezoning, no change is proposed to the current Zoning Code standard pending further discussion with Town Attorney. For new developments part of a rezoning, require 1.75- acres of recreation area for every 85-dwelling units. Jurisdiction Area Requirement Pima County 1.70-acres per 85 dwelling units Sahuarita 1.41-acres per 85-dwelling units Oro Valley 1-acre per 85 dwelling units Marana 0.39 to 0.98-acres per 85 dwelling units depending on lot size Tucson None Highest Lowest Finding #4: More meaningful amenities can be required Finding:There are no provisions in the Zoning Code to ensure meaningful amenities in private recreation areas. Proposed standards to ensure quality amenities Require minimum amenity types (shade, seating, ADA access etc.) in all new private recreation areas. Require minimum of one active and one additional amenity. For every additional ½-acre of private recreation area, one active and one additional amenity must be provided. Active amenity Additional amenity Basketball court Horseshoe pit Pickleball court Small turf area Volleyball court Picnic table Large shaded play structure Bocce ball Swimming pool Small standalone play structure Lesser Value Amenities (built 2003) Higher Value Amenities (built 2004) Finding #5: Multi-family residential requirements Finding:There are no provisions to ensure meaningful amenities in multi-family residential developments and the existing recreation area requirement is confusing. Proposed standards to require meaningful amenities and simplify recreation area size requirement Multi-family residential developments will have the same amenity requirements as single-family residential developments. Simplify existing Zoning Code language to require 17% of development area to be set aside as recreation area. General Plan and Strategic Leadership Plan General Plan key goals and policies Goal E: A high-quality parks, recreation and open space system that is accessible, comprehensive, connected and serves the community’s needs. Policy CC.2: Provide appropriate park facilities and services for residents of all ages in the community. General Plan focal guiding principle Provide more parks, recreation and cultural opportunities for all ages. Strategic Leadership Plan direction Review Town codes related to recreation amenity requirements for residential subdivisions and recommend updates that will prioritize larger neighborhood area parks and amenities as outlined in the Parks and Recreation Needs Assessment. Summary of recommendations Finding #1: Private recreation spaces can be consolidated Consolidate private recreation areas unless there are special circumstances. Require new adjacent subdivisions to share private recreation areas. Private recreation areas should be no more than a ½-mile, or 10-minute walk from all residents. Finding #2: Private parks greater than ¼-acre have more recreational value Private parks smaller than ¼-acre must pay an in-lieu fee to support public parks. Private parks larger than ¼-acre must provide recreational area with limited opportunities to use in-lieu fee subject to Town Council approval. Finding #3: Required private recreation area size can be increased For new developments without a rezoning, no change is proposed to the current Zoning Code standard. For new developments part of a rezoning, require 1.75-acres of recreation area for every 85-dwelling units. Finding #4: More meaningful amenities can be required Require minimum amenity types (shade, seating, ADA access etc.) in all new private recreation areas. For every ½-acre of private recreation area, one active and one additional amenity must be provided. Finding #5: Multi-family residential requirements Multi-family residential developments will have the same amenity requirements as single-family residential developments. Simplify existing Zoning Code language to require 17% of development area to be set aside as recreation area. Town Council Meeting Regular and Study Session February 1, 2023