HomeMy WebLinkAboutOV1800934�P``EY A9i�o l 1PC---, l
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
OQO,-`'
DEVELOPMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES DEPARTMENT
11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE, ORO VALLEY, AZ. 85737
PHONE: (520) 229-4800 FAX: (520) 742-1022
www.orovalleyaz.gov/dis
1.2 GENERAL APPLICATION FORM Office Use Onl
EOVCase #: g
Application
Tvpe
c-a- 17
❑
Major General Plan Amendment
❑ Final Plat
®
Rezoning/PAD Amendment
❑ Pre -Application
❑
Planned Area Development
❑ Zoning Verification !!IJ
❑
Conditional Use Permit
❑ Sign Criteria
❑
Zoning Code Amendment
❑ Sign - PAD Exemption
❑
Conceptual Site Plan
❑ Master Sign Program
❑
Conceptual Public Art
❑ Communication Facility — Tier 1 and 2 Minor
❑
Conceptual Architecture
❑ Communication Facility — Major
❑
Final Site Plan
❑ Revised Development Plan
❑
Conceptual Landscape Plan
® Other Minor General Plan Amendment
Subject Property Information:
Address: 1211 N La Cholla Boulevard
Parcel/Tax Code: 219-42-016B
Subdivision / Commercial Center Name:
N/A
Book / Page or Sequence Number: N/A
Lot Number(s) N/A
Legal Description: SE4 SE4 EXC RDS 29.9 AC SEC 33-11-13
Section/Township/Range: Township 11S, Range 13E, Section 33 Area of Property: 22.22 acres
Existing Land Use: Public -Episcopal Church Proposed Land Use: Single Family Residential
Applicant
Information:
* If more than one, attach list
Applicant *:
Name: Brian Underwood
Firm: The Planning Center
Address: 2 E Congress Suite 600
City: Tucson State: AZ Zip: 85701
Telephone: 520-623-6146 Fax:
520-622-1950 Email: bunderwood@azplanningcenter.com
Property Owner(s) if different from Applicant *:
Name: Retired Reverend Kirk Stevan Smith Firm: The Episcopal Diocese of Arizona
Address: P.O. Box 68435 City: Tucson State: AZ Zip: 85737
Telephone: 480-695-5921 Fax: Email: dasis@ovapostles.org
Consultant: Planning (Discipline)
Name: Brian Underwood
Firm: The Planninq Center
Address: 2 E Congress Suite 600 City: Tucson State: AZ Zip: 85701
Telephone: 520-623-6146 Fax:520-622-1950 Email: bunderwood(aD_azplanningcenter.com
1
Project Description/Narrative:
Please see attached project narrative.
I hereby certify that I have read and examined this application and know the same to be true and correct. I am the owner
of the property or the Owner's authorized representative, and if not the owner, I have obtained the owner's permission to
perform stated work. All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this type of work will be complied with whether
specified herein or not. The approval of this application does not presume to give authority to violate or cancel the
provisions of any other federal, state or local law for which this project may be subject to.
Notice: It is the applicant/owner's responsibility to ensure all private rules and regulations (such as Covenants, Conditions
& Restrictions (CC&R's)) of the subdivision and/or commercial center are adhered to. Contact your Home Owners
Association or property management to determine applicable requirements.
It is also the applicant's responsibility to coordinate with all outside agencies to secure their acceptance or clearance.
Failure to do so may delay issuance of permits. See attached list of agencies.
Applicant's Signature Print Name Date
Important Note: All submittals received after 4:00 p.m. will be processed the next day
Submittals will be rejected if:
• Not folded using Pima County fold & collated;
• There are missing items on the checklist unless otherwise approved by Planning Division Manager or Town Engineer.
• Re -submittals cannot be accepted without a transmittal and a written narrative summary describing the purpose of
submittal.
2
Cresta Morado Applicant List:
The Planning Center
• Contact:
Brian Underwood
• Address:
2 E Congress Street, Suite 600
Tucson, AZ 85701
• Phone:
520-623-6146
• Fax:
520-622-1950
• Email:
bunderwood@azplanningcenter.com
Transwest Properties
• Contact: Randall G. Dix
• Address: 2850 E Skyline Drive, Suite 200
Tucson, AZ 85718
Richmond American Homes
• Contact:
Rick Morris
• Address:
3091 W Ina Road
Tucson, AZ 85741
• Phone:
520-229-5443
• Email:
rick.morris@mdch.com
Carlier Company
• Contact:
Michael Carlier
• Address:
2850 E Skyline Drive, Suite 100
Tucson, AZ 85718
• Phone:
520-906-3800
• Email:
mike@carliercompany.com
ova J PLIEY A9/2029
t .
FOUN D EO 19" R
Town of Oro Valley
Community & Economic Development
April 19, 2019
Brian Underwood
The Planning Center
2 E. Congress Street, Ste. 600
Tucson, Arizona 85701
Re: OV1800934, General Plan Amendment, Rezoning Site Analysis, and Tentative
Development Plan (3rd review)
The referenced project is generally acceptable provided the following conditions are addressed:
Site Analysis
1. In accordance to Town Standards, In -Lieu fees shall be provided for future pedestrian
circulation paths along all property street frontages. This includes In -Lieu fees for sidewalk
along Como Drive, Limewood Rd, and sidewalk along La Cholla Blvd. In addition, In -Lieu
fees shall be provided for a multi -use path along Tangerine Road.
2. Provide a paved roadway section along Como Drive from Tangerine Rd to Limewood Rd.
Roadway section shall be in accordance requirements of the Town Engineer, and Town
Standards.
Traffic Analysis
3. Provide finalized Traffic Impact Analysis upon rezoning approval, incorporating any
changes to the Tentative Development Plan.
If you have any questions regarding these comments, please do not hesitate to contact me via
my office phone (520-229-4824) or email (etineo@orovalleyaz.gov).
Sincerely,
Esteban Carlos Tineo, P.E. '
Senior Civil Engineer
Development Engineering Permits
v
4 ►
4 �
,►
..�+'
/oUNOED 1g�R
Town of Oro Valley
Community & Economic Development
April 22, 2019
Brian Underwood
The Planning Center
2 E. Congress Street, Ste. 600
Tucson, Arizona 85701
Re: OV1800934, General Plan Amendment, Rezoning Site Analysis, and Tentative
Development Plan (3rd review)
The referenced project is generally acceptable provided the following conditions are addressed:
Site Analysis
1. In accordance with Town Standards, In -Lieu fees shall be provided for future pedestrian
circulation paths along all property street frontages. This includes In -Lieu fees for sidewalk
along Como Drive, Limewood Rd, and along La Cholla Blvd. In addition, In -Lieu fees shall
be provided for a multi -use path along Tangerine Road.
2. Provide a paved roadway section along Como Drive from Tangerine Rd to Limewood Rd.
Roadway section shall be in accordance with requirements of the Town Engineer, and
Town Standards.
3. As part of any future Final Design submittal, provide an analysis of the structural integrity
of Limewood Drive to determine if the road is capable of handling additional traffic
generated by this development in its existing condition. The analysis shall include
findings and recommendations for any required mitigation determined by the analysis,
subject to review and approval by the Town Engineer.
Traffic Analysis
4. Provide a finalized Traffic Impact Analysis upon rezoning approval, incorporating any
changes to the Tentative Development Plan, and any comments provided.
If you have any questions regarding these comments, please do not hesitate to contact me via
my office phone (520-229-4824) or email (etineo@orovalleVaz.gov).
Sincerely,
Est Carlo ineo, P.E.
Senior Civil Engineer
Development Engineering Permits
Town of Oro Valley
Community & Economic Development
September 17, 2018
Brian Underwood
The Planning Center
2 E. Congress Street, Ste. 600
Tucson, Arizona 85701
Re: OV1800934, General Plan Amendment, Rezoning Site Analysis, and Tentative
Development Plan (2nd review)
The Town of Oro Valley has completed the Engineering review of the proposed rezoning
request and offers the following comments.
General Comments
1. Tentative Development Plan: The proposed Como Drive access geometry does not meet
minimum OV Design Standards, and therefore not acceptable. The geometry results in
substandard sight visibility and left -out conflicting movements. Therefore, provide a full
access drive onto Como Drive, a minimum of 150-feet north of the planned Victory Church
access drive. In addition, include paving and drainage improvements along Como Drive
from the end of the Victory Como Drive improvements to Limewood Rd accordingly.
2. Revise the TIA (Traffic Impact Analysis) to reflect full access onto Como Drive, including
the corresponding trip distributions.
If you have any questions regarding these comments, please do not hesitate to contact me via
my office phone (520-229-4824) or email (etineo(a-)_orovalleyaz.gov).
SincereVa
Estebao,
P.E.
Senior Civil Engineer
Development Engineering Permits
.tea!
4 -
CRESTA MORADO
REZONING DOCUMENT
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
C amez,
THEPLANNINGCENTER
007 a division of TPC Group, Inc.
Cresta Morado Rezoning
Oro Valley, Arizona
Submitted to.,
Town of Oro Valley
Planning Division
11000 North La Canada Drive
Oro Valley, Arizona 85737
Prepared for.,
ANGH, LLC
2850 East Skyline Drive, Suite 200
Tucson, AZ 85718
Prepared by.,
The Planning Center
2 East Congress, Suite 600
Tucson, Arizona 85701
With assistance from;
The WLB Group
4444 East Broadway Blvd
Tucson, AZ 85711
And,
Bogardus Engineering, LLC
16618 North Avenida De La Reata
Tucson, AZ 85739
And,
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
333 East Wetmore Road, Suite 280
Tucson, AZ 85705
August 14, 2018
Case #:OV1702583
0
Cresta Morado Rezoning
SiteAnalysis Introduction..................................................................................................................1
PARTI. Inventory and Analysi...........................................................................................................4
1. Existing Land Uses..........................................................................................................................................5
A. Site Location and Regional Context......................................................................................................5
B. Existing On -Site and Off -Site Land Uses..............................................................................................9
C. Conditions on Properties within a One -Quarter (1 /4) Mile Radius ................................................... 11
2. Environmentally Sensitive Lands................................................................................................................. 16
A. ESL Conservation Categories............................................................................................................ 16
B. ESL Conservation Additional Categories........................................................................................... 16
C. Total Acreage of Each On -site Conservation Category .................................................................... 17
3. Topography...................................................................................................................................................19
A. Site Topography.................................................................................................................................. 19
B. Sloped Area Analysis.......................................................................................................................... 19
C. Slope Area Analysis Map - Two (2) Foot Contour Intervals: ............................................................ 19
4. Cultural, Archaeological and Historic Resources........................................................................................ 21
A. Report from Arizona State Museum (ASM), the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), a
qualified archaeologist or a professional architect............................................................................ 21
B. Cultural Resources Survey and Inventory Report ............................................................................. 22
C. Description of Resources and Recommendations of Significance.................................................. 22
D. Treatment Plan (if required)................................................................................................................ 22
5. Hydrology...................................................................................................................................................... 24
A. Off -Site Watersheds............................................................................................................................ 24
B. Balanced and Critical Basins.............................................................................................................. 25
C. Significant Off -site Features (Natural or Man-made) that May Affect or be Affected by the Site ... 25
D. Area in Acres of Upstream Off -Site Watersheds with 100-Year Discharges Greater than 100 cfs.26
E. Location and Ownership of Wells/Well Sites within 100 Feet........................................................... 26
F. On -Site Hydrology............................................................................................................................... 26
G. Existing Drainage Conditions Along Downstream Property Boundary ............................................ 28
6. Vegetation..................................................................................................................................................... 30
A. Describe and Map............................................................................................................................... 30
7. Wildlife........................................................................................................................................................... 34
A. Letter from Arizona Game and Fish Department Habitat Specialist ................................................ 34
B. Arizona Game and Fish Department Wildlife Environmental Review .............................................. 34
8. Viewsheds.....................................................................................................................................................46
A. Viewsheds Analysis............................................................................................................................ 46
B. View Preservation Plan(VPP)............................................................................................................ 46
C. Core Character Vegetation (CCV)..................................................................................................... 51
9. Traffic.............................................................................................................................................................61
A. Existing and Proposed Off -Site Streets............................................................................................. 61
B. Arterial Streets within One (1) Mile..................................................................................................... 61
10. Recreation and Trails.................................................................................................................................... 68
A. Open Space, Recreation Areas, Parks and Trails within One (1) Mile ............................................ 68
%O'W Table of Contents i
Cresta Morado Rezoning
B. Acreage of Parks and Recreation Areas........................................................................................... 68
11. Schools..........................................................................................................................................................70
A. Existing and Proposed Schools within One (1) Mile......................................................................... 70
B. Existing and Proposed Schools Serving the Site Not within One (1) Mile ....................................... 70
12. Water............................................................................................................................................................. 72
A. Contact Person for Water Service Provider....................................................................................... 72
B. Domestic Water Supply if Not Within a Defined Water Service Area .............................................. 72
13. Sewers...........................................................................................................................................................72
A. Location of Existing Public Sewer...................................................................................................... 72
14. McHarg Composite Map............................................................................................................................... 75
A. Composite Map................................................................................................................................... 75
PARTII — Land Use Proposal..........................................................................................................77
1. Project Overview........................................................................................................................................... 78
A. Tentative Development Plan.............................................................................................................. 78
B. General Plan Future Land Use Designations.................................................................................... 81
C. Proposed Land Uses, Principal and Accessory Uses....................................................................... 81
2. Existing Land Uses....................................................................................................................................... 83
A. Zoning and Existing Land Uses on Adjacent Properties................................................................... 83
B. Effect of Proposed Development on Existing Land Uses On -site and Off -site ................................ 83
3. Environmentally Sensitive Lands.............:................................................................................................... 84
4. Topography...................................................................................................................................................87
A. Tentative Development Plan's Response to Site Topography......................................................... 87
B. Areas of Encroachment onto Slopes................................................................................................. 87
C. "Hillside Conservation Areas"............................................................................................................. 87
D. On -site Grading................................................................................................................................... 87
5. Cultural/Archeological/Historic Resources.................................................................................................. 87
6. Hydrology...................................................................................................................................................... 87
A. Tentative Development Plan Response to Hydrologic Conditions ................................................... 88
B. Substantiate any Modification of Drainage Patterns ......................................................................... 88
C. Map Drainage Impacts........................................................................................................................ 89
D. Describe & Map Engineering & Design Features Used for Mitigation ............................................. 89
E. Describe Conformance to Area & Basin Management Plans.......................................................... 89
7. Vegetation..................................................................................................................................................... 92
8. Wildlife........................................................................................................................................................... 92
9. Viewsheds.....................................................................................................................................................92
A. Describe and Map how DP mitigates Impacts to: ............................................................................. 92
B. Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District (TRCOD) Additional Information ................................... 93
10. Traffic.............................................................................................................................................................95
A. Traffic Analysis Report ........................................................................................................................ 95
11. Recreation/Trails...........................................................................................................................................96
�� Table of Contents ii
Cresta Morado Rezoning
A. Access to off -site Trails....................................................................................................................... 96
B. Ownership of Natural and Modified Open Space.............................................................................. 96
12. Schools..........................................................................................................................................................96
A. Number of Students Generated by Rezoning................................................................................... 96
B. Remaining Capacity in Schools......................................................................................................... 97
C. School Capacity Letter........................................................................................................................ 97
13. Water...........................................................................................................................................................100
A. Demand Generated from Rezoning................................................................................................. 100
B. Assured Water Supply Letter........................................................................................................... 100
14. Sewer...........................................................................................................................................................103
A. Sewer Service...................................................................................................................................103
B. RWRD Capacity & Service Letter....................................................................................................103
15. Buffer Yards................................................................................................................................................ 105
A. Techniques for Mitigating Sound, Visibility, Exterior Lighting and Traffic......................................105
B. Buffer yard Cross Sections...............................................................................................................105
List of Exhibits
Exhibit
1.1.A.1: Regional Context....................................................................................................6
Exhibit
1.1.A.2: Local Context...........................................................................................................7
Exhibit1.1.A.3:
Site Location.............................................................................................................8
Exhibit
1.1.B: Existing Land Uses....................................................................................................10
Exhibit
1.1.C.i: Existing Zoning.......................................................................................................12
Exhibit
1.1.C.ii: General Plan Land Use Designations.................................................................14
Exhibit
1.3.A: Topography and Slope............................:................................................................20
Exhibit
1.4.6: Archaeological Records Search.............................................................................23
Exhibit
1.5.A: Existing Hydrology...................................................................................................29
Exhibit
1.6.A: Vegetation Communities.........................................................................................33
Exhibit
1.8.B: View Preservation Plan.............................................................................................47
Exhibit
1.8.A.1A: Photo Key Map.....................................................................................................52
Exhibit
1.8.A.2A: Site Photos............................................................................................................53
Exhibit
1.8.A.2A: Site Photos (cont.)...............................................................................................54
Exhibit
1.8.A.2A: Site Photos (cont.)...............................................................................................55
Exhibit
1.8.A.1 B: TRCOD Photo Key Map.......................................................................................56
Exhibit
1.8. A.2113: TRCOD Site Photos............................................................................................57
Exhibit
1.8. A.21B: TRCOD Site Photos(cont.)................................................................................58
Exhibit
1.8. A.21B: TRCOD Site Photos(cont.)................................................................................59
Exhibit
1.8. C: TRCOD CCV...............................................................................................................60
Exhibit1.9.A: Traffic..........................................................................................................................67
Exhibit
11.1.1: Parks and Trails.........................................................................................................69
Exhibit
1.11.A Existing and Proposed Schools.............................................................................71
Exhibit
1.13.A.1: RWRD Capacity Letter.........................................................................................73
Exhibit
1.13.A.2: Existing Public Sewers........................................................................................74
Exhibit
1.14.A: McHarg Composite Map.........................................................................................76
Exhibit
11.1.A: Tentative Development Plan...................................................................................80
@ Table of Contents iii
Cresta Morado Rezoning
Exhibit 11.2.B: Modified General Plan Future Land Use Designations......................................82
Exhibit11.3: ESL................................................................................................................................86
Exhibit 11.6.1: Post Development Hydrology.................................................................................91
Exhibit 11.9.B.ii: Conceptual Elevations..........................................................................................94
Exhibit 11.12.C: School Capacity Letter..........................................................................................98
Exhibit 11.13.B: Assured Water Supply Letter.............................................................................101
Exhibit 11.14.B: RWRD Capacity & Service Letter......................................................................104
Exhibit 11.15.B: Buffer yard Sections............................................................................................106
List of Tables
Table 1.6.A.i.a: Plant Species Observed On-site................................................................................................
31
Table 1.6.A.ii: LISFWS List of Plant Species for Pima County............................................................................
32
Table 1.9.13: Characteristics of Arterial Streets within One (1) Mile....................................................................
62
Table 1.9.6: Ownership of Arterial Streets within One (1) Mile..........................................................................
64
Table 1.12.A: Water Service Provider Contact information................................................................................
72
Table 11.3.F: Acreages for Conservation Categories and ESOS.......................................................................
85
Table 11.12.A: Students Generated by Rezoning................................................................................................
96
Table 11.12.B: School Capacity and Availability...................................................................................................
97
a
it Table of Contents iv
Cresta Morado Rezoning
Site Analysis Introduction
The proposed rezoning request is for a portion of an approximately 29.91-acre (Assessor
Parcel Number (APN): 219-42-016B) property located at the northwest corner of La Cholla
Boulevard and Tangerine Road. The Episcopal Church of the Apostles originally purchased
the property with the vision of building and eventually expanding their existing facilities.
However, due to the economic downturn and the "empty church" movement, their
envisioned expansion is no longer financially feasible. As of recent, the Episcopal Church
of the Apostles has been approached by the development community to develop the area
of the site surrounding the existing church. Recognizing the value of having a potential
residential community surrounding the church and a viable commercial corner, the church
is seeking to capitalize on the expressed interest from the development community. Given
this, the church leadership team is seeking to rezone approximately 22.22-acres of the
29.91-acre property currently zoned R1-144 (Single Family Residential District) to R1-7
(Single Family Residential District) for the development of a 54-lot subdivision entitled
Cresta Morado. In addition to the rezoning, an amendment to Your Voice, Our Future, the
Town of Oro Valley's General Plan, will be processed concurrently with this application to
amend the 22.22-acre portion of the subject property from the "Public/Semi-Public" land use
designation to the "Medium Density Residential" (MDR).
The primary purpose of the Inventory and Analysis section for the Cresta Morado Rezoning is
to identify the site's opportunities, constraints and various physical characteristics, the analysis
of which will provide a means whereby development is designed in a sensitive and responsive
manner to the physical conditions of the site. Information for this section was compiled from a
variety of sources, including site visits, referencing topographic, hydrological, archaeological
and traffic analyses, and correspondence with Town of Oro Valley Planning Division staff. The
Inventory and Analysis follows the Town of Oro Valley requirements provided in the Town of
Oro Valley Zoning Code.
Pursuant to such requirements, information on the following physical components of the site
was compiled to assess the suitability of the property for development:
• Existing land uses, roads and other development
• Environmentally Sensitive Lands
• Topography
• Cultural/Archeological/Historic Resources
• Hydrology
• Vegetation and Wildlife
• Viewsheds
• Traffic Analysis
• Recreation/Trails
• Schools
• Water and Sewer
0.1
Introduction 1-2
Cresta Morado Rezoning
The proposed development will be sensitive to the surrounding land uses, and will provide
appropriate buffers and transitions between land uses to protect the character of the area.
See Exhibit 1.1.A.1: Regional Context and Exhibit 1.1.A.2: Local Context.
aq
V'V Introduction I-3
Cresta Morado Rezoning
1. Existing Land Uses
This section of the Inventory and Analysis identifies existing zoning, land uses and structures
onsite and on surrounding properties, as well as proposed developments in the project vicinity.
A. Site Location and Regional Context
The project site is situated within the western limits of the Town of Oro Valley in
Township 11 South, Range 13 East, Section 33. The property in its entirety is
approximately 29.91-arces and can be identified by APN: 219-42-016B. The subject
property is bordered by Limewood Drive to the north, La Cholla Boulevard to the east,
Tangerine Road to the south and Como Drive to the west, with current access from La
Cholla Boulevard. The site falls within the Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District
(TRCOD), a district with the intent of preserving the value of lands and the Upper
Sonoran Desert character found in this area as well as restrict direct access to and from
Tangerine Road. Roadway reconstruction and widening per the Tangerine Road
Corridor Project is also currently underway.
North and west of the site consists of predominately low density residential
development. Immediately west of the project area on the west side of Como Drive is
Victory Worship Center which is situated on an approximately 8.75 acres and is in
preliminary design stages for future expansion. The land on the northeast corner of La
Cholla Boulevard and Tangerine Road, known as the Mercado Mandarina project, was
recently entitled for a mix of commercial and office uses with an integrated assisted living
component. The remaining 7.69 acres of land on the northwest corner of La Cholla
Boulevard and Tangerine Road, also owned by the Episcopal Church of the Apostles,
has been designated for future commercial use. The land south of the subject property
remains vacant.
See Exhibit 1.1.A.1: Regional Context, Exhibit 1.1.A.2: Local Context, and Exhibit 1.1.A.3:
Site Location.
,C7.
W Introduction 1-5
Cresta Morado Rezoning
14
t.
It ,,E
t
RdzC adlon
Golf C /rt ty
Love kit Mt nDov
Mo ��►
Tonokla
Pro :,c rli e
G
1're serve p E
i o
Moore Road v
a
Gl.li iAP1:1 — Tangerine Road �11
Mtaro Road
yo;Aw-bT—
m
`E
�
`
M
C
0
m
o
o
G
is
�
O'
V
U
a
Exhibit 1.1.A.1: Regional Context
Jiit)
d ol>>
Iucs )
LEGEND
Site Location Tortolita Mountain Park NORTH
0" 1 Mile 2 Miles
Oro Valley ® Municipal Jurisdictions
—1 Pima County RLENAME: ECA regional_6x8.mxd
SOURCE: Pima County GIS, 2014
Introduction 1-6
Cresta Morado Rezoning
LEGEND
MIRezoning Boundary Major Local Roads
QJurisdictions Minor Local Roads
Exhibit 1.1.A.2: Local Context
NORTH
U' 15003000'
FILE NAME: ANG-01_location_Ox8
SOURCE: Pima County GIS, 2014
00 Introduction 1-7
Cresta Morado Rezoning
IIS13E33
LJMEWOOD DR
Exhibit H.A.1 Site Location
LEMONWOOD RD
— 1!4R 11 i -
IL #0
_J —
5 L
0UJ
0 0 1 ILL
U TANGERINE RD
_0J
_J
0
_J
12S13E03--L
U)
>
W
12S13E04
i
>
GLOVER-RD
41,41', F
LEGEND
Notes:
Rezoning Boundary
Project Site is located at:
N-H 0'
500, 1000,
Township, Range & Section
Township 11S, Range 13E, Section
Acreage: Approx. 21.94 AC
33
Parcel ID #: 219-42-016B
FILE NAME- ANG-01—SiteLocaton — W
Jurisdictional Boundaries
SOURCE Puna County GS,2014
Introduction
1-8
Cresta Morado Rezoning
B. Existing On -Site and Off -Site Land Uses
The Episcopal Church of the Apostles is currently situated in the center of the subject
property and consists of a single -story structure and an adjoining parking area. The
subject property is currently zoned as R1-144 (Single Family Residential).
According to Your Voice, Our Future, the existing general plan land use designation for
the property is Public/Semi-Public, which is intended to promote the development of
institutional uses that serve the greater community such as churches, schools, etc.
The land uses of surrounding properties within one -quarter mile, as depicted in Exhibit
1.1.B: Existing Land Uses are as follows:
North: Single Family Residential
South: Vacant, Rancho De Plata, Rancho Del Cobre
East: Vacant (proposed neighborhood commercial — Mercado
Mandarina), Single Family Residential
West: Single Family Residential, Victory Worship Center
CD7.
Gu Introduction 1-9
Cresta Morado Rezoning
0
Z
r
O
U
Z
Exhibit 1.13: Existing Land Uses
ter-
W LEMONWOOD RD
W SUNKIST RD
i
/ CALVALRY CHAPEL 1
/ 'ORO VALLEY
W LIMEWOOD DR
y,
a 1
(o ' CHURCH OF THE,_,
iL + � 'APOSTLES.
W U
Z
O
Z
VICTORY WORSHIP
U l CENTER
Z
,__.10
W TANGERINE RD'
SUNSET CANYON- m !�
ESTATES VACANT
1.15 RAC o
�1& 2 Story;
°m
Li` Z .�
RANCHO
RANCHO DE PLATA DEL COBRE
> �',2.57.RAC` 1.12 RAC
Z 1 & 2'. Story. 1 & 2 Story
W GLOVER-RD
LA CHOLLA ESTATES
2.6 RAC
J
,COPPER RIDGE I
1.5 RAC
1 &'2 Story
NARANJA
>-
RIDGE 1"
i+
,1.7 RAC
{
1 &'2 Story
w
Z
'
4
.r.
v
/F Z•
LEGEND
Rezoning Boundary Q Approved Subdivision Plat Washes + H 01 500, 10Go'
r 1 1/4 Mile Radius Approved Development Plan Q Wells - F'
ILE NAME ANG 01_ex con(J—W
®Jurisdictional Boundaries SOURCE Pcma County GIS 2014
r
Introduction
1-10
Cresta Morado Rezoning
C. Conditions on Properties within a One -Quarter (1/4) Mile Radius
The existing Town of Oro Valley zoning designation on the property is R1-144, "Single -
Family Residential District", which is intended to promote and preserve suburban -rural
single-family residential development, and to promote agricultural uses and open
space.
i. Existing Zoning
The zoning of surrounding properties, as depicted in Exhibit 1.1.C.i
includes:
North: Pima County SR (Suburban Ranch)
South: R1-144 (Single -Family Residential District), R1-7 (Single
Family Residential District), R1-36 (Single Family Residential
District) and R1-20 (Single Family Residential District)
East: R1-144 (Single Family Residential District), C-N
(Neighborhood Commercial District) and C-1 (Commercial
District)
West: R1-144 (Single Family Residential District)
Introduction 1-11
Cresta Morado Rezoning
Exhibit H.C.i: Existing Zoning
v Granite Springs PI
Sunkist Rd Sunkist Rd+
/ SR
1 a
m Limewood Dr _
E 0` si. m J J
v o i PIMA COUNTY
_ R1144�
ORO VALLEY
`C-N
R1-144
Tangerine Rd
R1-144
R1-36
0
4'��"
�
R10
-
�!
laurel Dr
a
I
'00,
00-0
.
m
-- -
-
1
La Tanya PI
R1-20
-
3
Glover Rd
�
�
I
i
v
r17
a
a
R1-20
R1-10.
R1-10
_
Veronica Dr
i
LEGEND
Town of Oro Valley
Zoning
Pima County
Zoning
1 Rezoning Boundary
R1-144
- R4
® SR
f 1 1/4 Mile Radius
R1-36
- C-N
1 o
soo. 1000,
Q Jurisdictions
R1-20
C-1
Parcels
�.--,
t R1-10
FILE NAME ANG-01_zoning_6x8 mxd
SOURCE Para County GIS, 2014
00 Introduction 1-12
Cresta Morado Rezoning
ii. General Plan Land Use Designations
The site is located in an area that is and will continue to see growth. Its
location near a major intersection, Tangerine Road and La Cholla
Boulevard, makes it and the surrounding property a viable location for
higher density residential. The Town of Oro Valley General Plan Land
Use Map reflects the potential for growth (See Exhibit 1.1.C.ii: General
Plan Land Use Designations).
The subject rezoning area is currently designated as Public/ Semi -Public.
An amendment to the General Plan Land Use Map will be processed
concurrently with the rezoning application to redesignate the rezoning
area as Medium Density Residential. The surrounding general plan
designations within one -quarter mile of the site, as depicted in Exhibit
1.1.C.ii, are as follows:
North: Pima County Rural Low Density Residential (0-0.3 DU/AC)
South: Low Density Residential-1 (0.4 -1.2 DU/AC)
Low Density Residential-2 (1.3 - 2.0 DU/AC)
Medium Density Residential (2.1 - 5 DU/AC)
Neighborhood Commercial/ Office
East: Pima County Rural Low Density Residential (0-0.3 DU/AC)
Low Density Residential-1 (0.4 -1.2 DU/AC)
Neighborhood Commercial/ Office
West: Pima County Rural Low Density Residential (0-0.3 DU/AC)
Public/ Semi -Public
Introduction 1-13
Cresta Morado Rezoning
z
RD
Exhibit H.C.ii: General Plan Land Use Designations
WLEMONWOODRD:
W TANGERINE RD
P OR
F �
U 2
z
a z
D w
v z
r
LEGEND General Plan Designations
Rezoning Boundary I Rural Low Density Residential (0 - 0.3 DUJAC) 0• 500 1000,
r 1 114 Mile Radius Low Density Residential (0.4 - 1.2 DU/AC) 17771
Low Density Residential (1.3 - 2.0 DU/AC) RLE NAME: ANG-01yen plan_6x8
Jurisdictional Boundaries __ SOURCE: Puna County GIS,2016
Medium Density Residential (2.1 - 5 DU/AC) _ School Oro valley Gls, 2017
Neighborhood Commercial / Office Public / Semi -Public
i
04
Part 1 — Inventory and Analysis 1-14
Cresta Morado Rezoning
iii. Number of Stories of Existing Structures
The Episcopal Church of the Apostles is an existing single -story structure,
34 feet in height.
iv. Pending Rezones
There are no pending rezonings of properties within one -quarter mile of
the site.
V. Conditionally Approved Zonings
There are no pending conditionally approved zonings of properties within
one -quarter mile of the site.
vi. Approved Subdivisions and Development Plans
Approved Subdivisions within a quarter mile radius include:
• Sunset Canyon Estates
• Rancho De Plata
• Rancho Del Cobre
Approved Development plans within a quarter mile radius include:
• Episcopal Church of the Apostles
• Cavalry Chapel
• Victory Worship Center
vii. Architectural Styles of Adjacent Development
The existing homes surrounding the subject property are rural custom
single-family residences with southwest and ranch architectural styles.
The Victory Worship Center located west of the subject site is
architecturally similar to the Episcopal Church of the Apostles. It is a
large single -story structure comprised of materials that are sensitive to
the surrounding desert in color and texture. The Episcopal Church of the
Apostles is a single -story structure with two different heights. The main
worship area is approximately 34 feet in height and the entry and offices
are approximately 20 feet in height. The structure is comprised of large
concentric arched faces rather than a squared building. The fagade is
comprised entirely of a rose colored split face block and large glass
windows.
v�.� Part 1 — Inventory and Analysis 1-15
Cresta Morado Rezoning
2. Environmentally Sensitive Lands
A. ESL Conservation Categories
i. Major Wildlife Linkages
There are no major wildlife linkages on the property.
ii. Critical Resource Areas
There are no critical resource areas on the property.
iii. Core Resource Areas
There are no core resource areas on the property.
iv. Resource Management Areas: Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3
The property falls within a Resource Management Area (RMA), Tier 2
which requires 25% total open space (See Exhibit 1.2.A: ESL).
B. ESL Conservation Additional Categories
i. Critical Resource Areas:
a. Major Rock Outcrops
There are no major rock outcrops located onsite.
b. Distinct Habitat Resources
No distinct habitat resources exist onsite.
ii. Core Resource Areas
a. Distinctive Native Plant Stands
No distinctive native plant stands exist onsite.
iii. Resources Management Areas: Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3
a. Distinctive Individual Native Plants
A site visit was conducted in November 2017 to inventory native
plants that may be considered "distinctive" as defined in sections
27.10.D.3.d.iii.d and 27.6.B.3.b.ii of the Town of Oro Valley
GU Part 1 — Inventory and Analysis 1-16
Cresta Morado Rezoning
Zoning Code. During the inventory process, 10 specimens were
catalogued according to the Native Plant Preservation and
Mitigation standards set forth by the Town of Oro Valley. Nine of
the ten specimens were Saguaros larger than fifteen feet in height
with two or more arms. Most of the Saguaros found were in a state
of decline due to their age and size. Ailments included, broken
limbs, extreme discoloration, and areas of exposed skeleton. The
tenth specimen catalogued, #201, was a Littleleaf Palo Verde,
which has taken the role of a nurse plant (see Exhibit 1.2.A: ESL).
ID
NUMBER
SPECIES
HEIGHT
I CALIPER
I TRUNK
I VIABILITY
I DISPOSITION
ARMS
CARNEGIEA
200
GIGANTEA
16
0
SINGLE
HIGH
TOS
5
CARNEGIEA
201
GIGANTEA
20
0
SINGLE
LOW
NV
5
CARNEGIEA
202
GIGANTEA
19
0
SINGLE
LOW
NV
15
CERCIDIUM
203
MICROPHYLLUM
19
15
MULTI
MEDIUM
TOS
CARNEGIEA
204
GIGANTEA
19
0
SINGLE
MEDIUM
RFS
4
CARNEGIEA
205
GIGANTEA
19
0
SINGLE
LOW
PIP
4
CARNEGIEA
206
GIGANTEA
15
0
SINGLE
HIGH
TOS
3
CARNEGIEA
207
GIGANTEA
19
0
SINGLE
HIGH
TOS
0
CARNEGIEA
208
GIGANTEA
20
0
SINGLE
MEDIUM
RFS
4
CARNEGIEA
209
GIGANTEA
15
0
SINGLE
MEDIUM
TOS
3
b. Minor Rock Outcrops and Boulders
There are no minor rock outcrops or boulders located onsite.
C. Total Acreage of Each On -site Conservation Category
Conservation Category
Total On -site
Acreage
Major Wildlife Linkages
0 AC
Critical Resource Areas
0 AC
Core Resource Areas
0 AC
Resource Management Area Tier 1
0 AC
Resource Management Area Tier 2
22.22 AC
Resource Management Area Tier 3
0 AC
Developed Area Non -Wildlife Permeable
0 AC
6UC,�*I"�_`
-' Part 1 — Inventory and Analysis 1-17
Cresta Morado Rezoning
Exhibit 1.2.A: ESL
i
LEGEND
Rezoning Boundary ® Resource Management Area Tier 1 (66% open space) "Orr" o, 5w 1000•
QJurisdictions Resource Management Area Tier 2 (25% open space) I
Distinctive Individual Plants Resource Management Area Tier 3 (0% open space) FILE NAME: ANG.01_ESL 6x8.mxd
Critical Resource Area Category (95% o ens ace SOURCE PaOr County GIS.2016
P P ) Oro valley GIS. 2017
00 Part 1 — Inventory and Analysis 1-18
Cresta Morado Rezoning
3. Topography
A. Site Topography
The elevations on the property range from approximately 2,778 feet to 2,800 feet. The
parcel slopes from the northeast to southwest in a consistent manner. The site does
not have any significant topographical features. Existing topography at two -foot contour
intervals are shown on Exhibit 1.3.A: Topography and Slope.
i. Rock Outcrops
There are no significant rock outcrops on the property.
ii. All other Significant Topographic Features
There are no other significant topographic features on the property.
B. Sloped Area Analysis
The site does not contain land that meets the Hillside Area requirements in Section
27.10.D.3.g.ii of the Oro Valley Zoning Code.
C. Slope Area Analysis Map - Two (2) Foot Contour Intervals:
See Exhibit 1.3.A: Topography and Slopes showing the following slope categories as
applicable:
a. 15% to less than 18%
b. 18% to less than 20%
c. 20% to less than 25%
d. 25% to less than 33%
e. 33% or greater
f. Ridgelines with elevation changes of twenty-five (25) feet or more
g. Rock outcrops and boulder
i. Sloped Area Analysis Table
Slope
Categories
S uare Feet
a.
15% to less than 18%
1078.52 sf
b.
18% to less than 20%
311.74 sf
c.
20% to less than 25%
82.98 sf
d.
25% to less than 33%
147.05 sf
e.
33% or greater
0
f.
Ridgelines with elevation greater than 25 feet or more
0
g.
Rock outcrops and boulders
0
There are no other significant topographic features on the property.
1177 10.1
GO Part 1 — Inventory and Analysis 1-19
Cresta Morado Rezoning
Exhibit 1.3.A: Topography and Slop(
LEGEND
Site Boundary 15-17% slopes _ 25-32% splopes 0, 150, 300'
Adjacent Parcels 18-19% slopes - Greater than 33% slopes
---- 2' Elevation Contours 20-24% slopes FILE NAME: ECA topo_slope_6x8mxd
SOURCE: Pima County GIs, 2014
Part 1 — Inventory and Analysis 1-20
Cresta Morado Rezoning
4. Cultural, Archaeological and Historic Resources
A. Report from Arizona State Museum (ASM), the State Historic Preservation Office
(SHPO), a qualified archaeologist or a professional architect
Although the project area has been previously surveyed, the Arizona State Museum
(ASM) recommends that the site should be revisited and surveyed due to the last survey
being more than ten years old. See Exhibit 1.43: Archaeological Records Search.
In June of 2017, a Class III survey of the project area was conducted by EPG as part
of a due diligence study. Regarding archaeological site AZ AA:12:299(ASM), EPG
found it "to have no significance in local, regional, or national prehistory or history, and
no further work is recommended." A copy of EPG's Cultural Resource Services
Technical Paper No. 2017-27 has been submitted under separate cover.
Determine whether site has been field surveyed for cultural resources.
The site, or portions of the site, have been surveyed for cultural resources
five times in the past. Three surveys were conducted as part of roadway
and infrastructure projects, one survey was conducted as part of the
Episcopal Church of the Apostles construction, and one as part of the
Northern Tucson Basin Survey.
ii. Previously recorded archaeological or historic resources known to exist
on the property.
According to the Arizona State Museum Archaeological Records Search
(refer to Exhibit 1.4.B: Archaeological Records Search) three
archaeological sites have been recorded within the project area. Two of the
sites were cleared of all surface artifacts and test pits revealed no
subsurface archaeological materials. The third site, Site AZ
AA:12:726(ASM) was originally mis-plotted and its correct location is well
outside of the development boundary.
iii. Probability that buried archaeological or historic resources would be
discovered on the site.
No buried archaeological or historic resources are expected to be
discovered on site.
,GID,
A Part 1 — Inventory and Analysis 1-21
Cresta Morado Rezoning
B. Cultural Resources Survey and Inventory Report
The ASM report identifies three archaeological sites on the property, none of which are
expected to be of significance.
Significant Cultural Resources based on Local Criteria
No significant cultural resources based on local criteria are expected.
ii. Significant Cultural Resources based on National Register Criteria
No significant cultural resources based on national register criteria are
expected.
C. Description of Resources and Recommendations of Significance
The ASM advises that a qualified archaeological contractor be consulted before any
ground disturbance begins. EPG was contracted to fulfill this role and accomplished a
survey in June of 2017. The document has been submitted under a separate cover.
D. Treatment Plan (if required)
No treatment plan is recommended.
0,11
't;j Part 1 — Inventory and Analysis 1-22
Cresta Morado Rezoning
1&Axizona State Museum
'.THE UNIVERSITY OFARIZONA.
Exhibit 1.4.B: Archaeological Records Search
ARCHAEOLOGiCAi. SIJVIMARY LETTER
This letter summarizes the results of archaeological records research. It does not constitute a cultural
resources clearance.
Date: 11i 27,2017
Company: The Planning Center
Phone: 520-623-6146
Legal Description: T11S, R13L•, S33
Project Name / Number: ANU-01
Search Results:
Requester -Name: Lexy Wellou
Address: 2 E. Congress St., Ste. 600. Tucson. AZ 85701
i.m ail: lwellottta?a7planningeenter.com
Project Area Location: Oro Valley. AZ
Project Description: Construction of single-family residential subdivision
According to a search of the archaeological records retained at the Arizona State Xhiscum (ASIXI), 23 survey projects were
conducted within a one -mile radius of the project area between 1979 and 2015. Previous survey work was conducted in
support of road construction and improvements; the construction of churches. schools. residential neighborhoods, and
cellular towers; academic archaeological research; and the installation of water and transmission lines. The entire project
area was surveyed in 1981 and 1996 in support of archaeological research (Fish et al. 1992; Madsen et al. 1993) and church
construction (Jones 1996). Twenty-nine archaeological sites have boon identified within a 1-mile radius of the project area.
Three sites have been identified within the project area.
Sites in Project Area:
Three archacological sites have been recorded within the project area (Fish ct al. 1992; .tones 1996; Madsen ct al. 1993).
Recommendations:
1. Although the entire pro.iect area has been previously surveyed, the work was conducted nearly over between 10
and 35 years ago. It is standard archaeological practice for a properly to be rc-surveyed if the previous survey was
conducted 10 or more years ago. as there is a possibility for unidentified archaeological properties to have suice
been exposed. ASM recommends, bin it is not required by ASM, that a qualified archaeological contractor be
consulted before any ground disturbance begins. A list of archaeological contractors is available on the ASM at:
http:!w.'ww.stateniuseum.aizona.cdu'crscrvices•pennitsr'index.shtnil.
2. Pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes §41-865. if any human remains or funerary objects are discovered during project
wort:, all work will stop within the area of the remains and Dr. Todd Pitezel. ASM associate curator ol"archaeology, will be
contacted at (520) 621-4793.
3. City. county, or municipal gcnremments may have requirements. therefore ASM recommends that the relevant
jtuisdiudon(s) be consulted.
If you have any questions about the results of this records search. please contact me.
Sincerely,
Shannon D. Twilling. M.A.
Research Specialist
Archacological Permits Office
Arizona State Aluseum
(520)621-2096
twilling ci! cma i 1. ar izona.cdu
page.I of.;
& Part 1 — Inventory and Analysis 1-23
Cresta Morado Rezoning
5. Hydrology
The following site hydrology information was analyzed and prepared by Bogardus Engineering,
LLC. All hydrology information is for planning purposes only and is subject to
verification/modification via the drainage report with supporting calculations based on then
existing and proposed conditions at the time of subdivision platting.
A. Off -Site Watersheds
The existing use of the parcel was developed as the Episcopal Church of the Apostles
with an approved Drainage Report supporting the small development. The report was
prepared by the WLB Group, Inc and dated 17 December 2001. The gross area of the
parcel is approximately 29.91 acres with the net building area of approximately 4.20
acres. The site is located northwest of the intersection of Tangerine Road and La Cholla
Blvd. The existing church gains access from La Cholla Blvd. More specifically, the parcel
is located within a portion of Section 33, Township 11 South and Range 13 East, Pima
County, Town of Oro Valley, Arizona.
The parcel drains in a southerly direction. The parcel is bound on the north by Limewood
Drive. There is one residence with multiple out buildings located in the watersheds to the
north. There are four (4) watersheds that cross Limewood Drive and enter this parcel at
the north property line. Two of the four watersheds were further divided for delineations
for post developed conditions. Concentration Point 1.11 drains an area of approximately
8.82 acres and generates the 100-year peak discharge of approximately 48 CFS which
is conveyed south along N. Como Drive. There are two smaller watersheds that impact
the center of the north property line, Concentration Point 1.21 and Concentration Point 1
.22 which drain an area of approximate 4.83 acres and 4.11 acres respectively. The two
watersheds generated 100-year peak discharge of approximately 30 CFS and 22 CFS
respectively. There are three sub watersheds, Concentration Points 4.11, 4.12 and 4E
which drain a combined area of approximately 10.7 acres which will all coalesce into
Concentration Point 4.1 on -site and will generate a 100-year peak discharge of
approximately 52 CFS upstream of the entry Road of the existing development on -site.
There are five (5) watersheds that exit the site at the southern boundary north of
Tangerine Road. Concentration Point 1 is the combination of Concentration Point 1.1
which drains Como Drive. which drains an area of approximately 12.46 acres, and
Concentration Point 1.2 which drains an area of approximately 22.72 acres, coalesces at
the South West comer of the parcel. Concentration Point 1.2 drains the western half of
the parcel inclusive of the existing development on -site and the two middle watersheds
off -site at Limewood Drive. The combination of the two watersheds drain a total area of
approximate 35.18 acres and includes both on -site and off -site drainage which will
generate a 100-year peak discharge of approximately 158 CFS.
There are two smaller watersheds Concentration Points 2 and 3 which each drain areas
less than 2 acres and generate 100-year peak discharges of 14 and 8 CFS respectively.
4 Part 1 — Inventory and Analysis 1-24
Cresta Morado Rezoning
Concentration Point 4 drains the eastern quarter of the property in a southerly direction.
The entire watershed drains an area of approximately 17.15 acres and generates a 100-
year peak discharge of approximately 76 CFS.
The eastern edge of the property drains a portion of La Cholla Boulevard into the property
and exits the property at Concentration Point 5. Concentration Point 5 drains an area of
approximately 6.01 acres and generates a 100-year peak discharge of approximately 39
CFS.
Concentration Points 3, 4, and 5 will coalesce off -site and drain under Tangerine Road
via an existing CMP culvert. Concentration Point 1 and 2 will drain over top Tangerine
Road.
B. Balanced and Critical Basins
The approved drainage report forthe Church of the Apostles had indicated that the parcel
was not located within a critical or balanced basin. Further the drainage standards at that
time indicated that the only required mitigation for the commercial development would be
five-year threshold retention. This criteria has changed.
The Pima County Regional Flood Control District design standards for stormwater
detention and retention has determined that within unincorporated Pima County, a
watershed is considered a balanced basin unless it has been determined to be a critical
basin. This basin has since been established as a critical basin. Unless a detention waiver
has been granted new development located within a critical basin must provide sufficient
detention to reduce the post developed 2-, 10-, and 100-year peak discharge rates to
10% below the pre -developed rates.
C. Significant Off -site Features (Natural or Man-made) that May Affect or be Affected
by the Site
The upstream watersheds impacting the site has a single residence with many
outbuildings constructed on 36.92 acres and remains in a predominantly natural
condition. Therefore, there are no off -site upstream features that will impact this parcel.
The parcel is bound by paved road on the south by Tangerine Road, on the east by La
Cholla Blvd, and on the north by Limewood Drive. On the west the property is bounded
by a Dirt Road Como Drive. The north paved road allows stormwater runoff to flow across
the road in localized dip sections. La Cholla Blvd drains to the shoulder of the road and
into this parcel. There are no improved drainage improvements within the road.
Tangerine Road typically allows the stormwater runoff to flow across the road in localized
dip sections, except for a single culvert under tangerine Road the drains Concentration
Points 3, 4 and 5.
4't,� Part 1 — Inventory and Analysis 1-25
Cresta Morado Rezoning
D. Area in Acres of Upstream Off -Site Watersheds with 100-Year Discharges Greater
than 100 cfs.
There are no upstream off -site watersheds that generated 100-year peak discharge
greater than 100 CFS.
E. Location and Ownership of Wells/Well Sites within 100 Feet
According to the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR) and Pima County
GIS data, there are no wells located on or within 100 feet of the subject property.
F. On -Site Hydrology
100-Yr. Floodplains with Discharges Equal to or Greater than 50 cfs
There are no watersheds entering the site that exceed 50 CFS for the 100-
year event. The off -site watersheds were evaluated based on the location
of their discharge within the community and upon a single thread. When the
threads coalesced and combined within the property a new concentration
point was established.
Concentration Point 1 C represents the location on -site where the combined
flows exceed 50 CFS. Concentration Point 1 C is 100-year peak discharge
of approximately 64 CFS. Concentration Point 1A represents the
combination of Concentration Points 1 C and 1 B for a total 100-year peak
discharge of approximately 79 CFS. Two additional on -site watersheds are
combined with flow from Concentration Point 1A to exit the site at
Concentration Point 1.2 for a total 100-year peak discharge of 103 CFS
draining an area of approximately 22.72 acres.
Concentration Point 4.1 represent the second location on -site where the
combined flows exceed 50 CFS. Concentration Point 4.1 represents the
combined flow of the off -site watersheds 4.11, 4.12 and 4E. The combined
watersheds drain an area of approximately 11.01 acres and generates a
100-year peak discharge that reaches the threshold of 52 CFS. The existing
conditions have a retention basin upstream of the road crossing with a 12-
inch PVC pipe underneath Road with most of the flow overtopping the
roadway. Stormwater runoff is conveyed to the southern property boundary
at Concentration Point 4 and drains a total area of approximately 17.05
acres and generates a 100-year peak discharge of approximately 76 CFS.
Concentration Point 1.1 is an off -site watershed adjacent to the property
and drains within the street prism. The watershed drains a total area of
approximately 12.46 acres and reaches the threshold of 55 CFS at the
South West corner of the property. The combined flow of the off -site
Part 1 — Inventory and Analysis 1-26
Cresta Morado Rezoning
watershed at Concentration Points 1.1 and 1.2 are combined off -site four a
total 100-year peak discharge of approximately 158 CFS.
The remaining watersheds, Concentration Points 2, 3 and 5 are
nonregulatory discharges and typically on -site only watersheds.
Concentration Point 5 does in fact include a portion of the La Cholla Blvd.
ii. Areas of Sheet Flooding and Average Depths:
The contributing watersheds for this parcel are typically small and will
concentrate into major watercourses. The concentrated flows have a
mapped and has been shown on the pre -developed exhibit. Typically, there
are no major sheet flow areas within the property.
iii. Federally Mapped Floodways and Floodplains:
There are no federally mapped floodways or floodplains on this parcel. The
parcel is located within a FEMA Zone X pursuant to flood insurance rate
map 04019C1070L. A Zone X are areas determined to be outside 0.2%
annual chance floodplain. Zone X includes areas for the flood hazard has
not been mapped by FEMA but may have been mapped by local
jurisdictions; therefore, Zone X does not necessarily mean there are no
flood hazards. The watersheds within this parcel are typically less than 50
CFS, except where noted above, and have been designated as
nonregulatory discharges.
iv. 100-Year Peak Discharges Exceeding 50 cfs:
There are two watersheds with 100-year peak discharge that exceed 50
CFS. Concentration Point 1.2 drains an area of approximately 22.72 acres
and generates a 100-year peak discharge of approximately 103 CFS. The
watershed exits the property at the South West corner and coalesces with
stormwater runoff from Como Drive at Concentration Point 1.1. Both
Concentration Points 1.1 and 1.2 coalesce off -site at Concentration Point 1
which drains a total area of approximately 35.18 acres and generates a
combined 100-year peak discharge of approximately 158 CFS.
Concentration Point 2 ultimately coalesces with Concentration Point 1
farther downstream.
Concentration Point four drains an area of approximately 17.05 acres and
generates a 100-year peak discharge of approximately 76 CFS. The
watershed exits the property along the southern property boundary and will
coalesce with Concentration Points 3 and 5 downstream and off -site.
See Exhibit 1.5.A: Existing Hydrology.
cob Part 1 — Inventory and Analysis 1-27
Cresta Morado Rezoning
G. Existing Drainage Conditions Along Downstream Property Boundary
Tangerine Road bounds the property on the southern property line. Concentration Point
1 Will Cross Tangerine Rd. at Como Drive. Concentration Point 2 will be conveyed along
the north face of Tangerine Road in a roadside drainage ditch to Como Drive where it
coalesces with Concentration Point 1. Concentration Points 3, 4, and 5 coalesce at the
North face of Tangerine Road and is conveyed under the road via a CMP culvert.
@-1
Part 1 — Inventory and Analysis 1-28
TABLE OF 100-YEAR PEAK DISCHARGES
483
TABLE OF 100-YEAR PEAK ➢ISCHARGES
C P
Area (ac)
0100 (cfs)
C P
Area (ac)
0100 (cf5)
' °
6
e
1
35.18
158.4
4E
1.85
11.5
1.1
12.46
54.8
2
3
1.88
13.7
1.11
8,82
47.5
1.9
1.10
7.6
1.12
0.30
4
17.05
75.7
1.2
22.72
103.1
4.10
11.01
52.2
299
855
430
141 4,11 -
1
1.22 4.11 21.5 4.12 0.30 1.9 1
1A 16.99 78.8 5 6.01 38.7 %J }
13 2.36 19.3 5.1 1.21 11.3
1C 13.76 63,6 5,2 1.33 9,5
in 6.10 29.9
Th
a.R
-AA
b V
�h I i7
1 ..�"i ylT1, Q Mw. � Q� O • �.Y M � L
ai/N�✓' 'T . ''7�.�.1 R.IM1 FC3
411
4
-- --- L I M E W O O D DRIVE �----f " 1 21 rb'...
�. Ux T 1
�71,
V7 161. j 1
13
10
L !!
'ic
4
-..., • O5.1
1
3 4;
TANGERINE ROAD
LEGEND
1.1 Concentration Point Flow Line E�!n��j �:D�$ PRE DEVELOPED WATERSHED MAP
t ENGINEENINS, LLC
-' f- fEE76 N.MnNW Or41Wd CHURCH OF THE APOSTLES
Watershed Boundary r T„�,,,u,,,,,
p PRwr(6201677A690 Pu(6?B)90010u PARCEL I1):219-42-016B
l ryrey.r Hr.e °.yon`�
BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 33,
T•11 d. XME, OMAN., TOM OF OR D VAIUPYYW COUNTY. ANQONA
0' 200' 400' 600' BOCLj=aPNalECT NO.
10Y/O1S Ii0*AOID
I•. - oR
a•ta 1
Cresta Morado Rezoning
6. Vegetation
A. Describe and Map
i. Vegetative Communities and Associations On -Site
The project site is located south of the Tortolita Mountains adjacent to La
Cholla Boulevard and Tangerine Road and contains native vegetation that
is typical of that found in the Arizona Sonoran Desert. The property occurs
within the Arizona Upland subdivision of the Sonoran Desertscrub biotic
community (Brown and Lowe 19801). See Exhibit 1.6.A: Vegetation
Communities.
Existing onsite vegetation predominately consists of Foothills Palo Verde
Trees (Parkinsonia microphylla), Velvet Mesquites (Prosopis velutina),
Prickly Pear, and various Cholla species. A partial wash extends north onto
the property from Tangerine Road along the southeast property line. The
vegetation found in the wash is similar to that found on the remainder of the
site, however the vegetation is denser in this location.
a. Arizona Upland Subdivision, Palo Verde -Mixed Cactus series:
Existing upland vegetation across the property is homogenous in
vegetation species composition and structure. Dominant species on
the property include: Foothills Palo Verde (Parkinsonia microphylla),
Brittle Bush (Encelia farinosa), Barrel Cacti (Ferocactus wislizeni),
Saguaro (Carnegiea gigantea), various Cholla species (Opuntia sp.),
Prickly Pear species (Opuntia sp.) and a variety of other small cacti.
Approximately 12.37 acres of property adjacent to the western
property boundary is designated by Pima County as an Ironwood
Special Element. However, Ironwoods were not observed on the
property.
The health of undisturbed upland vegetation onsite is generally fair to
good. The Saguaro age across the site is mature and little
regeneration of the population is evident. The mature Saguaros
observed are showing distinct signs of age. Many of the upland trees
across the site are also showing signs of age. The signs range from
dead and dying limbs to an abundance of mistletoe. There are few
areas where regeneration amongst all the upland trees is evident.
' Brown, D.E., and C. Lowe, 1980. Biotic communities — Southwestern United States and Northwestern Mexico. Map. University of Utah
Press. Salt Lake City, Utah.
@ Part I — Inventory and Analysis 1-30
Cresta Morado Rezoning
Table 1.6.A.i.a: Plant Species Observed On -site.
SCIENTIFIC NAME
COMMON NAME
Ambrosia deltoidea
Triangle -leaf bursa e
Baccharis sarothroides
Desert broom
Carve iea gigantea
Saguaro cactus
Echinocereus s .
Hedaehoa cactus
Ferocactus wislizenii
Barrel cactus
Fou uieria s lendens
Ocotillo
Larrea tridentate
Creosotebush
Mammillaria microcar a
Pincushion cactus
O untia en elmannii
Prickly ear cactus
O untia ful ida
Chain fruit cholla
Parkinsonia micro h lla
Foothills palo verde
Proso is velutina
Velvet mesquite
Sene alia greggii
Catclaw acacia
Vachellia constricts
White thorn acacia
ii. Significant Cacti and Groups of Trees and Federally Listed Threatened
or Endangered Species
a. Significant Cacti and Groups of Trees:
A site visit and inventory of significant cacti and vegetation was
completed in accordance with Town of Oro Valley requirements in
November 2017 (See Exhibit 1.2.A: ESL). There were ten instances
of significant vegetation that were documented onsite. Nine of the ten
instances were significant Saguaros measuring greater than fifteen
feet in height with more than three arms. The final instance was of a
nurse tree, the only one found onsite. No instances of significant
trees, groves or populations as defined by the Town of Oro Valley
Zoning Code 27.6.B.3.b were observed onsite.
b. Special -Status Plant Species
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) identified four plant
species in Pima County that have protection under the Endangered
Species Act (ESA) (Table 1.6.A.ii).
None of these species are expected to occur on the property. In
addition, the Arizona Game and Fish Department's (AGFD) Heritage
Data Management System (HDMS) was accessed via their On-line
Environmental Review Tool, to locate records of occurrences within 3
miles of the property for these species. The HDMS also includes
records for numerous other species that do not have Endangered
Species Act (ESA) protection (special -status species), and of lands of
environmental concern, such as critical habitat for species with ESA
protection and wildlife linkage corridors. The HDMS does not include
Part I — Inventory and Analysis 1-31
Cresta Morado Rezoning
records for any plant species with ESA protection. The summary
page from the HDMS review has been included as Exhibit: 1.6.A.ii:
AGFD Online Environmental Review.
Table 1.6.A.ii: USFWS List of Plant Species for Pima County
Common Name Scientific Name ESA Status
Plants
Acura cactus
Echinomastus erectocentrus
Proposed Endangered
var. acunensis)
Huachuca water umbel
Lilaeopsis schaffneriana ssp.
Endangered
recurva)
Pima pineapple cactus
Coryphantha scheeri var.
Endangered
robustispina)
Nichol Turk's head cactus
Echinocactus
Endangered
horizonthalonius var. nicholi►)
iii. Vegetative Densities by Percentage of Plant Cover
Pima County GIS (2016) categorizes the entire site as Palo Verde
Mixed Cactus. However, there is a large area of developed property in
the middle of the site that not categorized properly as disturbances are
present. This area should be mapped as Agriculture/ Developed/
Water/ Bare Ground. The density of the Palo Verde/Mixed Cactus
onsite is medium density. See Exhibit 1.6.A: Vegetation Communities.
@--- Part I — Inventory and Analysis 1-32
Cresta Morado Rezoning
Exhibit 1.6.A: Vegetation Communities
a
J
J
_0
U
Q
J
Pima County
LI M E W OOD D R r _ _���--- -----—_.----------- �.---- — -- I
Oro Valley
b
a I
� I
0
0
U
217
£„ Developed _-
(Not Categorized) i
TANGERINE RD
r
� � f
F
LEGEND Vegetative Communities Pima County Special Elements
Rezoning Boundary Sonoran Desertscrub J Ironwood Special Element h,T�. c_ 1W soo,
Agriculture / Developed / Note: The enitre site is classified LL
Water / Bare Ground as Palo Verde/ Mixed Cacti
FILE NAME: ANG-01 vegetation 6x8mxd
SOURCE: Pima County GIS, 2014
r
0 Part I - Inventory and Analysis 1-33
Cresta Morado Rezoning
7. Wildlife
A. Letter from Arizona Game and Fish Department Habitat Specialist
Presence of any State -listed Threatened or Endangered Species
The Lesser Long -nosed Bat (leptonycteris curasoae yerbabuenae) is
listed as an endangered species that can be found within a three-mile
radius of the site.
ii. High Densities of a Given Species or Unusually High Species Diversity
According to the Arizona Game and Fish Department, there is no
evidence that high densities of a given species exists within the project
area.
iii. Aquatic or Riparian Ecosystems
According to the Arizona Game and Fish Department, there are no
aquatic or riparian ecosystems found within a three-mile radius of the
project area
B. Arizona Game and Fish Department Wildlife Environmental Review
In support of this analysis, the AGFD Heritage Data Management System (HDMS) was
accessed via their On-line Environmental Review Tool, to locate records of occurrence
within 3 miles of the property for these species. The summary page from the HDMS
review has been included as Exhibit. 1.7.B: AGFD Online Environmental Review.
The Sonoran Desert Tortoise (Gopherus morafkai) is a candidate for Endangered
Species Act (ESA) protection. The HDMS search found that the tortoise occurs within 3
miles of the property. The tortoise carries a sensitive (S) designation.
The Golden Eagle (Aquila crysaetos) occurs within 3 miles of the specific plan area and
falls under the federal protection of the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C.
668(a); 50 CFR 22) which prohibits the taking of any Golden Eagle without a permit. The
eagle also carries a sensitive (S) designation from the BLM.
The Cactus Ferruginous Pygmy -owl (Glaucidium brasilianum cactorum) has been
identified by the HDMS as occurring within three miles of the project site. The owl carries
SC and S designations.
The Reticulate Gila Monster (Helodema suspectum suspectum) and Gila Monster
(Helodema suspectum) occur within 3 miles of the property. They are listed as Species
of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) 1A.
Part I — Inventory and Analysis 1-34
Cresta Morado Rezoning
The Lesser Long Nosed Bat (Leptonycteris curasoae yerbabuenae) occurs within 3 miles
of the property. The bat carries a Listed Endangered (LE) designation.
The Lowland Leopard Frog (Lithobates yavapaiensis) has been identified by the HDMS
as occurring within three miles of the project site. The frog carries a Species of Concern
(SC), S, and S designations.
The property has been identified by the HDMS as a part of the Tucson — Tortolita — Santa
Catalina Mountains Linkage Design wildlife corridor.
X� Part I — Inventory and Analysis 1-35
Cresta Morado Rezoning
Exhibit: 1.7.13: AGFD Online Environmental Review
Arizona Environmental Online Review Tool Report
A rrzorra Game and Fish Department Mission
To conserve Arizona's diverse wildlife resources and manage for safe, corrrpatibie outdoor reareation
opportunities For current and Future generations.
Project Name:
AN G- 01
User Project Number:
AN G- 01
Project Description:
55 new lot construction on Oro Valley
Project Type:
DevelopmentWithin Municipalities (Urban Growth), Residential single dwelling and associated
infrastructure, New construction
Contact Person:
Chris Laria
organization:
The Planning Center
On Behalf OF:
OTHER
Project ID:
H G IS-0B301
Please re0ew€ha entire report For project type andlor species recommenda€ions Forthe location
in forma€io a entered. Please retain a copy to r Future reference.
Page 1 of 10
51,
Development Capability Report II-36
Cresta Morado Rezoning
Exhibit: 1.7.13: AGFD Online Environmental Review (Cont)
Arizona Game and Fish Department project_report_ang 01 24922_25599.pdf
ProjectID: H01S•05301 Review Date: 102=01703:52:4a PM
Disolai mer:
1. This Environmental R eview is based on the projectstudy area that was entered. The reportmust be
update d'd the projectstudy area, location, or the type of project changes.
2. Thisiisapreliminaryenvironmental soreeningtool.Itisnotasubstiuteforthepotentialknowledge
gained by having a biologist conduct afieIdsurvey of the projectarea. This review is also not intendedto
replace environmental consultation (including federal consultation under the Endangered Species A4,
land use permitting, or the Departments review ofsde-specific projects.
3. The Departmenis Heritage Data Management System(HDMS) data is not intended to include potential
distribution of s p eci al status species.Arizona is large and diversewith plants, animals, and
environmental con dit ons th at are ever changing. C onsequenty, many are as may containspecies that
biologists do notknow about or species previously noted in a particular area may no longer occur there.
H D M S data contains information about species occurrenoes that have actually been reportedto the
Department Nota11 of Arizona has been s urveye d f or s p e cial status species, and surveys that have been
conducted have varied greaty in scope and intensit/. Such surreys may reveal previously
undocumented population of species of special concern.
4. H a bi Ma p Arizo na data, specifically Species of GreatestConservation Need (SGCN) under our State
WildlNeAction PI an (SWAP) a nd Species of E con o mic an d R ecre at on al I mp o rtan ce (S E R 1). represent
p ote ntia I s pe cies d istrib ut on m od els fo r the State of Arizo na whi ch ar e s u bject to on go in g ch an ge,
modification and refinement. The status of awildIle resource can change quidcy, and the ava ila bil dy of
new data will necessitate a refined assessment
Locations Accuracy Disclaimer:
Project locations are assumed to be both precise and accurate for the purposes of environmental review. The
creatorfowner of the Project R eview Report is solely responsible for the project location and thus the correctness
of the Project Review Report content.
Page 2 or 10
4V
Development Capability Report II-37
Cresta Morado Rezoning
Exhibit: 1.7.13: AGFD Online Environmental Review (Cont)
Arizona Game and Fish Department project_report_ang 01 24922_25599.pdf
Project ID: HGIS-06301 Review Date: 102MOl 7 03:52:46 PM
Reco m men dat ion s Di sol ai mer:
1. The Departments interested in the conservation of all fish and wildlife resources, including those
species listed in this report and those that may have not been do cum entedwRhin the project vicinity as
well as other game and nongame wildlife.
2. Recommendations have been made by the D epartment, under authority of Arizona Revised Statutes
Title 5 (Amusements and Sports), 17 (Game and F sh), and 28 (Transportation).
3. Potential impacts tofsh andwildlife resources may be minimized or avoided by the recommendations
generated from information submitted for your proposed project. These recommendations are preliminary
in scope, des ignedto provide ea rly co ns i de rat ons on all species ofwildlife.
4. Making this information directly available does notsubstitute for the Departments review of project
proposals, and should not decrease our opportunity to review and evaluate additional project information
and/or new project proposals.
5. Further co or din ationwiththe Department req u ires th e s u bm Rta I of this Environmental Review Reportwith
a cover letter and project plans or documentation that includes proje at n ar rative, acreage to be impacted,
how construction or project activity(s) are to be accomplished, and project locality information (inoluding
site map). Once AGFD had received the information, please allow 30 days far completion of project
reviews. Send requests to:
Project Evaluation Program, Habitat Branch
Arizona Game and Fish Department
5000 West Carefree Highvay
Phoenix, Arizona 85086-5000
Phone Number: (623) 236-7600
Fax Number: (623) 236-7366
Or
PEPfmazafd.aov
6. Coordination may also be necessary under the National Environmental PolicyAct(NEPA) and/or
Endangered Species Act (ESA). Site specific recommendations may be proposed during further
NEPA/ESA analysis or through coordination with affected agencies
Page 3 Or 10
Development Capability Report II-38
Cresta Morado Rezoning
Exhibit: 1.7.13: AGFD Online Environmental Review (Cont)
Arizona Game and Fish Department project_report_ang_01 24922_25599.pdf
Project ID! HGIS-06301 Review Date 10/26/2017 03-52,46 PM
ANG-01
Aerial Image Basemap With Locator Map
the Gnll..ry g
Cmif Cluu
4. t�..r n- JR ✓' A
e`
V t — .p� 1 iIj /�j•{t�*ry,�i *y � � � �';M��' _+•{�i �f� r:� ������rJjs� '+^
•u�pt���,g0�i�'aalAff� . �.�t ""�� S a'c�'r� !j���r � Mf '�- at.ii$ti�:
Valley r i'(;
ei co War T
ti
„1M. ,
a
•N
❑ Project Boundari
Buffered Project Boundary
Project Sae (acres) 28 58
LatlLong (DD). 32.4259 !-111.0147
County(s) : Pima
AGFD Region(s): Tucson
Township+Range(s): T11S, R13E
_o-texrn
USGS Quad(s) RUELAS CANYON
Service Later Credits. Sources- Esn, HERE. DeLorme. hrtermap, Increment P
Corp.. GEBCO. USGS. FAO. NPS. NRCAN. GeoBase. IGN. Kadaster NL,
Ordnance Survey. EEO Japan MET1. Esn China (Hong Kong). swisstopo.
Page 4 of 10
R
L�
Development Capability Report II-39
Cresta Morado Rezoning
Exhibit: 1.7.13: AGFD Online Environmental Review (Cont)
Arizona Game and Fish Department project_report_ang_01_24922_25599.pdf
Project ID HGIS-06301 Review Date* 10/26/2017 03:52:46 PM
AN G-01
Web Map As Submitted By User
-•u
C
C
N
vV
S
Stem
C+m�on f�
Club m
• C
Wrwx
o iMCwlt ':ant'cn
Kra Club at Perk
c virloeo
2 Y
Z 2
.Y Moore Rd
W Moore Rd z
0
Vi L
0U Of
A
Qyr
--- W-Tan g.n n. Rd �1d(-.�
WTang-in.-Rd•E-Tang" r
2
o
N.twya
®
bwna+la s- v
A
Perk
OW Camino del Norte
r W Naranla.Dr
J
z
W irakey Ln
= UzP
r
vv Polvin Ln
Valtev
X
Flying brain end Dr
VV Lani bed L n
e
- � ra vaWy
p. .. Country Club
o I `
L l u
0 0,2750.55 11 165
Project Boundary
❑ Buffered Project Boundary
88
Page 5 of 10
Project Size (acres) 28 58
Lat/Long (DD): 32.42591 -111 0147
County(s). Pima
AGFD Region(s): Tucson
TownsNp/Range(s) T11S R13E
USGS Ouad(s). RUELAS CANYON
s— ry ircr n�L -r, ink.n �—i P r, arn=. use.. rro
K=S, lMTA, Grx:rsa, rn. R:c:r6v Al prl— .. m. Cap 1y-, NZ Lni
fiinq I g K-9—i._-qc M p,,q mic_ dOF A-.r p —i Nc
i� ;Jan CCmnx.'r
Development Capability Report II-40
Cresta Morado Rezoning
Exhibit: 1.7.13: AGFD Online Environmental Review (Cont)
Arizona Game and Fish Department project_report_ang 01_24922_25599.pdf
Proiect ID HGIS-06301 Review Date: 10/26/2017 03:52*46 PM
ANG-01
Topo Basemap With Township/Ranges and Land Ownership
IJ Buffered Project Boundary
Mixed/Other
LatfLong (DID) 32.4259 / •111 0147
Township,Ranges
National Park/Mon
County(s) Pima
Land ownership
Private
AGFD Region(s)' Tucson
AZ Game and Fish Dept.
State and Regional Parks Township/Range(sy T11S. R13E
SLM
State Trust
USGS Quad(s). RUELAS CANYON
BOR
US Forest Service
6a.-c» C. IfiF., nclwme. Ywa,r,we. Mraw+nl P �4'V. G[eGG. U3G5_ [AG
Indian Res
1Mldlife ArearRefuge
nos."reran,C- M—�,K mil„?:aim.s,...y.>:..�
r-- rw.o s ocnns n+n rnm a nn ,m ,r
Go U— [wrmwe 1
Page 6 of 10
Development Capability Report II-41
Cresta Morado Rezoning
Exhibit: 1.7.13: AGFD Online Environmental Review (Cont)
Arizona Game and Fish Department project_report_ang 01 24922 25999.pdf
ProjectlD: HOIS-06301 Review Date: 1026/201703:52:46 PM
Special Status Species and Special Areas Documented w4thin3 wiles of Project Vicinity
Soientifio Name
Common Name
FWS
USFS
BLM NPL
SGCN
Aquila chrysaetos
Golden Eagle
BOA
S
18
Glaucidium brasilianum cactorum
Cactus Ferruginous Pygmy -owl
SC
S
S
18
Gopherus morafkai
Sonoran Desert Tortoise
CCA
S
S
1A
Helodermasuspectumsuspectum
Reticulate Oila Monster
1A
Helodermasuspectum
Gila Monster
1A
Leptorrycteris curasoae
Lesser Long nosed Bat
LE
1A
yerbabuenae
Lithobatesyavapaiensis
Lowland Leopard Frog
SC
S
S
1A
Tucson- Tortolita- Santa Catalina
Wildlife Corridor
Mountains Linkage Design
Note: Status code def+ §outs can behand athttosJAraww.azafd.comlwildI'rfeJolannina+wildlifeauidelinesJstatusdeftnitionsJ
Speciesof Greatest Conservation Need
Predicted vithin 3 Mles of Project Vionity based on Predicted Range Models
Scientific Name
Common Name
FWS
, USFS
BLM NPL
SGCW
Attsponsa
Wood Duck
1B
Ammospermophilus harrisii
Harris'Antelope Squirrel
1B
Anaxyrus ret'rformis
Sonoran Green Toad
S
1B
Anthus s p ra gu e ii
Sprague's Pipit
SC
1A
Antrostomus ridgaayi
Buff -collared Nighlar
S
18
Aquila chrysaetos
Golden Eagle
S
1B
fits pidoscelis stictogramma
Giant Spotted Whiptail
SC
S
1B
Athene cunioularia hypugaea
Western Burrowing Owl
SC
S
S
1B
Botaurus lentiginosus
American Bittern
18
Chilomeniscusstramineus
Variable Sandsnake
1B
Colaptes chrysoides
Gilded Flicker
S
1B
Coluber bilineatus
Sonoran Whipsnake
18
Corynorhinus townsendii pallescens Pale Towns end's Big - eared Bat
SC
S
S
18
Crota[us tigris
Tiger Rattlesnake
19
Cynanthus latirostris
Broad -billed Hummingbird
S
18
Dipodomysspectabilis
Banner -tailed Kangaroo Rat
S
19
Euderma maculatum
Spotted Bat
SC
S
S
19
Eumops perotis californicus
Greater Western Bonneted Bat
SC
S
1B
Falco peregrinus anatum
American Peregrine Falcon
SC
S
S
1A
Glaucidium brasilianum cactorum
Cactus Ferruginous Pygmy -owl
SC
S
S
1B
Gopherus morafkai
Sonoran Desert Tortoise
CCA
S
S
1A
Haliaeetus leucocephalus
Bald Eagle
SC
S
S
1A
Helodermasuspectum
Gila Monster
1A
Hypsiglena sp. nov.
Hooded Nightsnake
1B
Page 7 or 10
Z'I
Development Capability Report 11-42
Cresta Morado Rezoning
Exhibit: 1.7.13: AGFD Online Environmental Review (Cont)
Arizona Game and Fish Depaft ent project_report ang 01 24U22_2569g.pdf
ProjectlD: HGIS-OB301 Review Date: 10Q6F01703-.52A6 PM
Species of Greatest Conser%etion Need
Predicted +Within 3 Mies of Project Vicinity based on Predicted Range Models
Soil Entific Name
Common Name
FWS
USFS BLM
NPL SGCN
Incilius alvarius
Sonoran Desert Toad
1B
Krnosternonsonoriensesonoriense
DesertMudTurtie
S
1B
Lasiurus blossevillii.
Western Red Bat
S
1B
Lasiurus xanthinus
Wester nYellcw Bat
S
1B
Leopardus pardalis
Ocelot
LE
1A
Leptonycteris curasoae
Lesser Long -nosed Bat
LE
1A
yerbabuenae
Lepus alleni
Antelope Jackrabbit
113
Macrotus californicus
Calffornia Leaf -nosed Bat
SC
S
18
Melanerpes uropygialis
Gila Woodpecker
1B
Meleagris gallopavo mexicana
0ouId's Turkey
S
1B
Melospiza lincolnii
Lincoln's Sparrow
1B
Melozone aberti
Aberts Towhee
S
18
Micruroides euryxanthus
Sonoran Coralsnake
18
Myotis occulbas
Arizona Myotis
SC
S
18
Myotis velifer
Cave Myotis
SC
S
18
Myotis yumanensis
Yuma Myotis
SC
18
Nyctinomops femorosaccus
Pocketed Free -tailed Bat
19
Pa nth era onca
Jaguar
LE
1A
Perognathus amplus
Arizona Pocket Mouse
1B
Perognathus longimembris
Little Pocket Mouse
No
19
Status
Peucaea carpalis
Rufous -winged Sparrow
1B
Phrynosomasolare
Regal Horned Lard
18
Phyllorhynchus browni
Saddled Leaf -nosed Snake,
1B
Progne sub's hesperia
Desert Purple Martin
S
18
Setophaga peteohia
Yel low W ar ble r
1B
Sonorella eremite
San Xavier Talussnail
CCA
1A
Sonorella papagorum
Black Mountain Talussnail
1B
Tadarida brasiliensis
Brazilian Free -tailed Bat
1B
Thomomys umbrinus intermedius
Southern Pocket Gopher
1B
Troglodytes pacfficus
PacifoWren
1B
Vireo bellii arizonae
Arizona Bells Vireo
1B
Vulpes macrotis
Kit Fox
No
18
Status
Species of Economic and Recreation Importance Predicted Wthin 3 Mies of Project Vicinity
Scientific Name Common Name FWS USFS BLM NPL SGCN
..
Callipepla gambelii Gambels Quail
Page a of 10
Development Capability Report II-43
Cresta Morado Rezoning
Exhibit: 1.7.13: AGFD Online Environmental Review (Cont)
Arizona Game and Fish Department project_report_ang 01 24922_25689.pdf
Project ID: HGIS•08301 Review Date: 10215+201703:62:415 PM
Species of Economic and Recreation Importance Predictedvithin 3 hrilesof Project Vanity
Scientific Name Common Name FWS USES BLIM NPL SGCN
Odocoileus hemionus
Mule Deer
Pecar i tajacu
Javelina
Puma concolor
Mountain Lion
Zenaida asiatica
White -winged Dave
Zen aida macroura
Mourning Dave
Project Type: Develop ment Within Municipalities ( Urban Growth), Residential single dwelling and assooiAed
infrastructure, Newconstruction
Project Type Recommendations:
Fence recommendations will be dependant upon the goals ofthe fence project and the wildlife species expected to be
impacted by the project. General guidelines for ensuring wildlife- friendly fences include: barb less wire on the top and
bottom with the maximum fence height42", minimum height for bottom 16". Modifications to this design may be
cons ide re d fo r fe n cing anticipated to be ro utin ely e n cou nt e red by ek, bighorn sheep or pronghorn (e.g.. Pronghorn
fencing would require 18" minimum heightonthe bottom). Please refer to the Department's Fencing Guidelines located
on Wildlife F riendly Guidelines page, which is part of the Wlldrrfe Planning button at
hdtos:lhnww,azgfd.com4wildliWplannin uildliaf�uidelines/
.
During the planning stags ofyour project, please consider the local or regional needs ofwildlife in regards to movement,
connectivity, and access to habitat needs. Loss ofthis pe rm ea bil ity p revents: wildlife from accessing resources, finding
mates, reduces gene flow, prevents wiIdlHefrom re -colonizing areas where local extirpations may have occurred, and
ultimately prevents wildlife from contributing to ecosystem functions, such as pollination, seed dispersal, control of prey
numbers, and resistance to invasive species. In many cases, streams and washes provide natural movement corridors
for wildlife and should be maintained in their natural state. U plands also support a large diversity of species, and should
be contained within imp ortantwildrrfe movement corridors. In addition, maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem funotions
can be facilitated through improving designs of structures, fences, roadways, and culverts to promote passage for a
variety of wildlife. Guidelines for marry of these can be found
at: ildl'rfeouid- Hnest.
Consider impacts of outdoor lighting on wildlife and develop measures or alternatives that can betaken to increase
hu m a n s afety w h il e minimizing potential impacts tD wildlife. Conduatwildlifesurveysto determine specieswRhin project
area, and evaluate proposed activities based on species biology and natural historyto determine if artificial lighting may
disrupt behavior patterns or habitat use. Use only the minimum amount of light needed for safety. N arrow spectrum bulbs
should be used as often as possibleto lower the range ofspecies affected by lighting. All lig htin g s h ou Id beshielded,
canted, or cut to ensurethat light reaches only are as needing illumination.
Minimize potential introduction or spread of exotic invasive species. Invasive species can be plants, animals (exotic
snails), and other organisms (e.g., microbes), which may cause aReratio nto e co log ica I fu n d ons or competewith or prey
upon native species and can cause social imp aot (e.g., livestock forage re duotion, increase wildfire risk). The terms
noxious weed or invasive plants are often used interchangeably. Precautions should b e tak e n to w as h all equipment
utilized in the project activities before leaving the site. Arizona has noxious weed regulations (Arizona Revised Statutes,
Rules R3-4244 and R3-4246). See Arizona Department of Agriculture websRe for restricted plants,
httpgWag riculture.az,govl. Additionally, the U.S. D epartment of Agriculture has information regarding pest and invasive
plant control methods including: pesticide, herbicide, biological control agents, and mechanical control,
hip lMrnw.usda.govkvpsiportaVLsdahome. The Department regulates the importation, purchasing, and transportation of
wildlife and fish (R estricted Live Wildlife), please refer to the hunting regulations for further
information htt -ffiamwjzofd.comrhunting regulations.
page 90110
�0
Development Capability Report II-44
Cresta Morado Rezoning
Exhibit: 1.7.13: AGFD Online Environmental Review (Cont)
Arizona Game and Fish Department projeat _ repo rt_ang 01 24922 25599.pdf
Project ID: HGIS-05301 Review Date: 102EV201703:52:46 PM
The Department recommends that wildl'rfesurveys are conducted to determine if noise -sensitive species occur within the
project area. Avoidance or minimization measures could include conducting project activities outside of breeding
seasons.
Based on the project type entered, co or din at on with State Historic Preservation Office maybe required
(htto /lazstateo arks.co mlS H P CVin dex. Mml).
Trenches should be covered or back -filed as soon as possible. Incorporate escape ramps in ditches or fencing along the
perimeter to deter small mammals and herptefauna (snakes, lizards, tortoise) from entering ditches.
Based on the project type entered, coordination with Arizona Department of Water Resources may be required
(htto YAm-nanr.azwate r. c ovlazdwrld efa ult as ox).
Based on the project type entered, coordination with U.S. Army Corps of Engineers maybe required
(htto VANw w.us ace. ar mv. maI
Based on the project type entered, coordination with County Flood Control district(s) may be required.
Vegetation restoration projects (including treatments of invasive or exotic species) should have a completed site -
evaluation plan (identifying environmental conditions necessaryto re- establish native vegetation), a revegetation plan
(species, density, method of establishment), a short and long-term monitoring plan, including adaptive management
guidelinesto address needs for r ep lace me nt ve getatio n.
Project Location andlor Species Recommendations:
HDMS records indicate that one or more listed, proposed, or candidate species or Critical Habitat(Designated or
Proposed) have been documented in the vicinity of your project. The Endangered Species Act (ESA) gives the US F ish
and Wildlife Service (U SFWS) regulatory authority over all federally listed species. Please contact USFWS Ecological
Services Offices ateo is thn v lar izo nalor.
Phoenix Main Office
2321 W. R oya I P alm R d, Suite 103
Ph oe nix, AZ 95021
Phone: 602-242-0210
Fax: 002-242-2513
Tucson Sub -Office
201 N. Bonita Suite 141
Tucson, AZ 85745
Phone: 520-670-6144
Fax: 520-670-6155
Flagstaff Sub -Office
SW Forest Scienee Complex
2600 S. Pine Knoll Dr.
F I agstaff, AZ 85001
Phone:92&55132157
F ax: 928-556-2121
HDMS records indicate that Sonoran Desert Tortoise have been documented within the vicinity ofyour project area.
Please review the Tortoise Handling Guidelines found at: hors#vmw.azgfd.comkvildfrfelnongamemanagementftortoisel
HDMS records indicate that Lesser Long -nosed Bats have been documented within thevicinity of your project area.
Please review the Lesser Long -nosed Bat Management Guidelines
at: httos'lkwfy azgfd.comJPorta11mageslfilesAwildlifelplanningForAvildl'rfeF riendtvGuidelines/FINA.UecuyeHabitatGdin. odf
Analysis indicates that your project is located in the vicinity of an identified wildlife habitat linkage corridor. Project
planning and implementation efforts should focus on maintaining adequate opportunities for wild life per meabilhy. For
information pertaining to the linkage assessment and wildlife species that may be affected, please refer in:
httulAy w.corrid0rdesian.oralarizona. Please contactyour IocaIAtizona Game and Fish DepartnentRegionaI Office for
specific pr oje ct r eco mm en cations: https -1kywju_ azgf d. co mJAg enWOffices.
Page 100f10
fx3
Development Capability Report 11-45
Cresta Morado Rezoning
8. Viewsheds
A. Viewsheds Analysis
The project is in the Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District (TRCOD) as defined in
Section 27.10.D.3.f.iv.a.1 of the Town of Oro Valley Zoning Code. The required viewshed
analysis has been broken into two parts: views through the site from the corners of the
rezoning boundary (refer to Exhibit 1.8.A.1A: Photo Key Map and Exhibit L8.A.2A: Site
Photos) and the views from Tangerine Road as defined in Section 27.10.D.3.f.iv.a.1.A of
the Town of Oro Valley Zoning Code (see Exhibit L8.A. IB: TRCOD Photo Key Map and
Exhibit 1.8.A.2B: TRCOD Photos).
The general views into and across the site are predominately of native trees and the
occasional Saguaro. There is little significance to the vegetation and there are many
locations where visibility into the site consists solely of shrubs and cacti. There are
glimpses of the Tortolita Mountains from Tangerine Road, however, the proposed
development should not impede the mountains' visibility. This is due to the fact that
Tangerine Road is elevated above the southern property boundary.
B. View Preservation Plan (VPP)
Views from Tangerine Road and Como Drive were considered as part of the view
preservation plan for this project. The view from Tangerine Road north across the
property will be minimally impacted by the proposed development. The right-of-way
immediately adjacent to Tangerine Road extends approximately one -hundred feet north.
The vegetation in this area will be preserved creating a natural vegetative buffer between
the road and development. Additionally, no home will be greater than twenty-five feet in
height, thus making the existing church facility the tallest structure on the property by
approximately ten feet. No ridgelines or slopes of the Tortolita Mountains will be
impacted. Additionally, a viewshed analysis was conducted from Como Drive. The corner
stake between the adjacent property owners lots was identified and used for the analysis
point. The additional buffer space (approximately 180') provided between the property
line and the first proposed lot creates a vegetative screen that minimizes views of the
proposed development. No slopes or ridgelines of the Catalina Mountains are impacted
and the tallest structure on the property is the existing church.
- Part I — Inventory and Analysis 1-46
Cresta Morado Rezoning
Exhibit 1.8.13: View Preservation Plan
VIEW POINT
CreSta Morado Rezoning (COMO DR. LOOKING EAST ACROSS PROPERTY) OAQU-iEPLANNINGCENTER
View Preservation Pian # 1
N07E Photo sims are graphic in nature. They are based on pre engineerec conditions, orelimmary development plans and data that has not
to fully vetted through final development orocess. Sires are subject to change and may not accurately represent final developed conditions
88 Part I — Inventory and Analysis 1-47
Cresta Morado Rezoning
VIEW POINT
i
7
-- z{
MASSING STUDY
Cresta Morado Rezoning (COMO DR. LOOKING EAST ACROSS PROPERTY) T. P1 ,r!.J!rJGCENiER
View Preservation Plan # 1
NOTE Photc rims are graahic in nature They a-e tasec on pre engineered conditions prel mmer� development plans aril data tha' has nol
bs fully vetted th•cugh Kira development process Sims are subject to change nnc may rot accurate y representfnal develcpsd conditions
Part I — Inventory and Analysis 1-48
Cresta Morado Rezoning
VIEW POINT
Cresta Morado Rezoning (TANGERINE RD. LOOKING NORTH ACROSS PROPERTY)
View Preservation Plan #2
�v, THEPANNINGCENTER
NOTE- Phcto sims are graphic in rature They are based or pre encireered cor.dbons, prelimiiarf developmert plans arxi data that has no'
be fully vetted through final development process. Sims are subject to change and may not accurately represent final developed conditions
Part I — Inventory and Analysis 1-49
Cresta Morado Rezoning
KvN
Oro Valley Self -Storage & Business Center (NWC CALLE CONCORDIA AND ORACLE ROAD) 046PTHFPLANNINGCFNiER
MASSING STUDY #2�
NOTE: pi-9w signs are graphic in natu�e, They are med on pre engineered condipons, prel minary davelopment plars and data that has nct
be fully vetted tfiro-.gh final development process- Sims are subject to change and may not accurately represent final developed concitions
&, Part I — Inventory and Analysis 1-50
0
Cresta Morado Rezoning
C. Core Character Vegetation (CCV)
The projects adjacency to Tangerine Road and the Tangerine Road Overlay Districts
requires the inventory of vegetation that meets the requirement for Corridor Character
Vegetation (CCV). Designated plants listed in Chapter 27.10.D.3.f.iv.b.3 of the Town of
Oro Valley Zoning Code, found within the first fifty (50) feet of property adjacent to
Tangerine Road, were recorded as required. See Exhibit 1.8.C: TRCOD CCV.
Fourteen (14) instances, either individual or groups, were documented and mapped. The
vegetation is primarily comprised of Littleleaf Palo Verde (cercidium microphyllum) and
Saguaro (Camegiea Gigantea). The mapped instances are sporadic and do not make
up a comprehensive screen that benefits the "vegetative character" of Tangerine Road.
Much of what was inventoried was found to be in decent health but has started to show
signs of age and degradation. These signs range from mistletoe infections to dead and
dying limbs. Currently, the inventoried instances of CCV do not meet the intent of the
Town's Scenic Resource Category and the distinctive visual character of Oro Valley. In
cases where an area has previously been substantially disturbed or has little CCV to
preserve, the landscape treatment requirement of Section 27.6.0 shall apply.
Areas of distinct vegetation are also included within the CCV; see the SRI map and
inventory for a list of plants identified on the property. All plants inventoried were
inventoried in accordance with the requirements established in Chapter 27.6.E Native
Plant Preservation, Salvage and Mitigation of the Town of Oro Valley Zoning Code.
Cw Part I — Inventory and Analysis 1-51
Cresta Morado Rezoning
Exhibit I.8.AAA: Photo Key Map
4 3
Zx
t i4k dts'
e s 4 .4
A144
(Y'�7'`.Mc
- LIMEWOOD DRt
"� '.X .� • a "':� E < y �15^SY 1�iCfi� y�A � t,� r' g ;,[p P � �i rII+AR►MirW11/
e
t
i
y. ., +tom
O
r
�
"
4
IN
t
�
-
y
�v
r
t��{�S�R �.. t •.::� � pyYi� ASS" n F
a x
.,
y
- TANGERINE RD
.. a `'�' a �" � -.4 1E'i k �"i`�� a : � � �. - �d:e,. Fats.'. Y. r m ' - a ,,:•
y. r" ink
ot
• A°,,, a. "�, ;; '' 'i�=fie^ tea. �:, „ U `, • ;i*. .
F t� iy M `t^ Y ?y-�°"ti r �f �.+YF .� s+, ,p �� ✓f� „Jt, ,, g p t ,d►M ti y,ir
�fi .'SFs,:7-`i.�►" �,Yw .! tii' `>� ' y {!" �!' V y "� � rk`S� �E - � c � N�. t'� -� �'-
'-
;4 III T` : ly i .1Y� •�i�7���� _ s v Imp ry:Pktom•hy,2016.
LEGEND Notes:
Rezoning Boundary Photo locations are in compliance
Photo Location and Direction with the Tangerine Corridor Overlay
®District (D.3.f.vi.b.2.A)
Jurisdictional Boundaries
77;
Yrxti♦ 0' 200' 400'
FILE NAME: ANG-01_photo points_6x0
SOURCE Pima County GIS, 2014
Part I — Inventory and Analysis 1-52
Cresta Morado Rezoning
Exhibit 1.8.A.2A: Site Photos
Photo 1: View looking north along Como Dr. from Photo 2: View west to adjacent property from the
the southwest property corner southwest property corner
r
Photo 3: View looking south from the southwest
property corner
Photo 5: View looking north from the northwest
property corner at the adjacent parcel
5
Photo 4: view looking east across the site from the
southwest property corner
Photo 6: View looking west from the northwest
property corner
Part I — Inventory and Analysis 1-53
Cresta Morado Rezoning
Photo 7: View looking south along west property
boundary from the northwest property corner
Photo 9: View looking north from the northeast
property corner
Photo 11: View looking south from the northeast
property corner
88
Exhibit 1.8.A.2A: Site Photos (cont.)
Photo 8: View looking east from the northwest
property corner
Photo 10: View looking west from the northeast
property corner along Limewood Dr.
Photos 12: View looking east from the intersection of
La Cholla Blvd. and Limewood Dr. (northeast
property corner)
Part I — Inventory and Analysis 1-54
Cresta Morado Rezoning
Photo 13: View looking north from the existing
church property entrance on La Cholla Blvd.
Exhibit 1.8.A.2A: Site Photos (cont.)
Photo 14: View looking west from the existing church
property entrance
Photo 15: View looking south along La Cholla Blvd. Photo 16: View looking east across La Cholla Blvd.
from the existing church entrance from the existing church entrance
v
Photo 17: View looking north from a point
approximately 300 yards west of the church
i�o
Photos 18: View looking south from a point
approximately 300 yards west of the church
Part I — Inventory and Analysis 1-55
Cresta Morado Rezoning
tXhIbtt I.B.A.1 b: I KGUU PhotO Key map
it J
f: P
LIMMOOD DR
.�.q r :dam �y"�7r "�`t . * �•. � '>ti i1.
t
�oo
d, O+7
:stir
1 ti.wT d "A Aiif$f
a T"� �- [ J
e�. 1y t� s31t tZ
• R � r
a
TANGERINE RD
fA
'- o
t a, jC �P yr a lr y Map.ry: Pictom.try, 2016.
LEGEND Notes:
0 150• 300•
Rezoning Boundary Photo locations are in compliance
*))ljo- Photo Location and Direction with the Tangerine Corridor Overlay D L,
District (27.10.0.3.f.iv.a.1) FILE NAME: ANG-01_TRCOD_6x8
Jurisdictional Boundaries SOURCE. Puna Countv GIS 2014
Part I — Inventory and Analysis 1-56
Cresta Morado Rezoning
Photo 1: Southeast property corner
Photo 3
Photo 5
Photo 2
Photo 4
Photo 6
Exhibit 1.8. A.21B: TRCOD Site Photos
�O Part I — Inventory and Analysis 1-57
Cresta Morado Rezoning
Photo 7
Photo 9
Photo 11
Exhibit 1.8. A.21B: TRCOD Site Photos (cont.)
Photo 8
Photo 10
Photos 12
Part I — Inventory and Analysis 1-58
Cresta Morado Rezoning
Photo 13
Exhibit 1.8. A.2B: TRCOD Site Photos (cont.)
Photos 14
88 Part I —Inventory and Analysis I-59
Cresta Morado Rezoning
Ra Z
Exhibit 1.8. C: TRCOD CCV
DR
1
_.,,5
1
O a �,.• j
1
X , .J
TANGERINE RD
w
I { NZ",
41L§,
;,, m
Q
J
J
dy =
% V
LEGEND
Rezoning Boundary Plants and Plant Groups
Meeting CCV Requirements
--- 50' TRCOD CCV Setback NOTE:
2' Contour Interval Gaps in numbering is a result of
inventoried plants found to be
outside of 50' setback
88
knap ry Pktmnagy, 2016.
rrcanti G150' 300,
FILE NAME: ANG.01_TRCOD veg_W
SOURCE. Pcma County GIS.. 2016
See SRI Map for SRI inventoried plants
Part I — Inventory and Analysis 1-60
Cresta Morado Rezoning
9. Traffic
A. Existing and Proposed Off -Site Streets
The property is bounded by Limewood Drive to the north, La Cholla Boulevard to the
east, Tangerine Road to the south and Como Drive to the west. Entrance to the
property is gained by travelling north on La Cholla Boulevard from Tangerine Road.
This is currently the only entrance into the property, however there are two informal,
unrecognized, unpaved roads on the property. One runs along the southern property
boundary adjacent to Tangerine road, linking La Cholla Boulevard and Como Drive.
Another informal road links the existing church facilities to Como Drive on the western
property boundary.
No offsite roads are proposed as a part of this project. Existing roadways within the
project area are shown on Exhibit 1.9.A: Traffic.
B. Arterial Streets within One (1) Mile
Refer to Table 1.9. B: Characteristics of Arterial Streets within One (1) Mile.
%I
WPart I — Inventory and Analysis 1-61
Cresta Morado Rezoning
Table 1.9.13: Characteristics of Arterial Streets within One (1) Mile
Roadway
Road
Existing/
No.
Conforms to
Continuous
Curb/
Average
Capacity
Paving
Posted
Segment
Classification
Proposed
Lanes
Width
ROW*
Gutter
Daily
***
****
Speed
Rights -of-
****
Standards**
****
Traffic
limit****
Way
(ADT)
*****
Tangerine
Major Arterial
200/300
2-4
Yes
No
No
14,444
15,600-
Yes
45
Road
Feet
2016
32,900
La Cholla
Major Arterial
60-
2
Yes
No
No
2,001
15,600
Yes
45
Boulevard
240/150
(2013)
(S of
Magee)
Feet
La
Minor Arterial
150/150
4
Yes
No
Yes
8,604
32,900
Yes
40
Canada
Feet
(2016)
Drive
Naranja
Major Collector
140/80
2
Yes
Yes
Yes
4,734
15,600
Yes
35
Drive
Feet
2014
Moore
Major Scenic
54/80
2
Yes
Yes
No
1,900
15,600
Yes
45
Road
Route
Feet
(2012)
Pima Coun
Sources: *Pima County Mapguide (2017), **Pima County Major Streets and Scenic Routes Plan (2014) and Town of Oro Valley Subdivision Street Standards and Policies
Manual (2004), ***Florida Department of Transportation (2007), ****Google Earth (2015), *****Pima Association of Governments (PAG) (2016)
�'!i Part I — Inventory and Analysis 1-62
Cresta Morado Rezoning
Existing and Proposed Rights -of -Way
According to the Your Voice, Our Future General Plan Circulation Map,
Tangerine Road and La Cholla Boulevard are the closest major arterial
roads to the property as they border the property on the south and east
sides, respectively. Tangerine Road currently has a 300-foot right-of-way
and is in the process of roadway construction.
La Cholla Boulevard, south of Tangerine, is currently forty-five feet wide
from pavement edge to pavement edge. There is an additional seventy
feet of right-of-way that is used for a primitive path west of the road and a
paved multi -use path east of the road. The right-of-way is not continuous
in width or improvements. The segment of roadway north of Tangerine
Road narrows to a 60-foot right-of-way north of Limewood Drive.
La Canada Drive is located approximately one mile east of the project
site. It is considered a north -south minor arterial road that extends the
entire length of the Town limits. The right-of-way is at its maximum
planned width of 150 feet.
ii. Conformance to Oro Valley Minimum Requirements
Standards set forth in Your Voice, Our Future General plan describe
major arterial streets as having a right-of-way width ranging between 150
feet to 300 feet. They should be equipped with medians and have bike
facilities such as: curbed bike routes, multi -use lanes and/or shared -use
paths.
Tangerine Road is currently being improved from 1-10 to La Canada Road
and includes all necessary elements set forth in Your Voice, Our Future.
Construction is scheduled to be completed by 2026 (See Table /.9.B:
Characteristics of Arterial Streets within One (1) Mile).
La Cholla Boulevard does not meet the standards set forth in the general
plan. Historically, La Cholla Boulevard has been improved as
development progresses towards Tangerine Road. Currently, there are
no plans for improvements outside of intersection improvements
associated with the Tangerine Road Corridor Project.
Your Voice, Our Future describes minor arterial road standards as having
a right-of-way width ranging between 75 feet to 150 feet. They should be
equipped with medians and have bike facilities such as: curbed bike
routes, multi -use lanes and/or shared use paths. Minor arterials should
also have sidewalks on both sides of the street.
C°
�'� Part I — Inventory and Analysis 1-63
Cresta Morado Rezoning
La Canada Drive conforms to the all requirements for a minor arterial set
forth by the Town of Oro Valley general plan and applicable street
standards.
iii. Ownership (Public/Private)
Ownership of arterial roads located within one mile of the subject property
are publicly owned. Jurisdictional control varies between the Town of Oro
Valley and Pima County. The existing roadway that serves as the main
entryway to the Episcopal Church of the Apostles is currently privately
owned and maintained (see Table 1.9.B.iii: Ownership of Arterial Streets
within One (1) Mile) below.
Table 1.9.B: Ownership of Arterial Streets within One (1) Mile
Roadway Segment
Public/Private
Owner
Tangerine Road
Public
Oro Valley and Pima County
La Cholla Boulevard
Public
Oro Valley and Pima County
Moore Road
Public
Pima County
La Canada Drive
Public
Pima County
Naranja Drive
Public
Oro Valley
iv. Continuous and Not Continuous Right -of -Way
Tangerine Road is in the process of gaining a continuous right-of-way.
Completion of construction is scheduled to be completed by 2026. La
Cholla Boulevard does not have a continuous right-of-way. As part of the
Tangerine Road Corridor Project development process, the property
owners have already dedicated a portion of their land for the appropriate
right-of-way width. The first 1,200 feet of La Cholla Boulevard, south of
Tangerine Road, has yet to be developed and appropriate right-of-way
dedications have yet to be made. La Canada Road has a continuous
right-of-way. See Table /.9.B: Characteristics of Arterial Streets within
One (1) Mile.
V. Number of Travel Lanes, Capacity, and Design Speeds for Existing
Streets
Tangerine Road currently consists of two to four travel lanes and has
capacity to carry approximately 15,600 average daily trips (ADT). Upon
completion of the Tangerine Road improvement project, the road will
consist of four travel lanes, a designated speed of 45 mph and capacity
to carry approximately 32,900 ADT.
/C���'��1
4"V Part I — Inventory and Analysis 1-64
Cresta Morado Rezoning
La Cholla Boulevard currently consists of two travel lanes and has a
carrying capacity of approximately 15,600 ADT. The current speed limit
of La Cholla Boulevard is set at 45 mph. La Canada Drive consists of
four travel lanes with a set speed limit of 40 mph and a carrying capacity
of 32,900 ADT.
Refer to Table 1.9.B: Characteristics of Arterial Streets within One (1)
Mile.
vi. Present Average Daily Traffic (ADT) for Existing Streets
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) was gathered from Pima Association of
Governments (PAG) Transportation Data Management System using
their Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) numbers. ADT for Tangerine
Road was gathered from Local ID A-257 (14,444 AADT) and Local ID A-
258 (14,627 AADT). The ADT was then averaged for a result of 14,536
AADT.
ADT for La Cholla Boulevard was obtained from Local ID point A-343.
The 2016 AADT is 7,757.
ADT for La Canada Drive was gathered from Local ID B-113. The 2016
AADT is 11,869. See Table 1.9.B: Characteristics of Arterial Streets within
One (1) Mile.
vii. Surface Condition of Existing Streets Providing Access to the Site
The surface condition of all arterial streets that service the subject
property, including Limewood Drive are paved. Como Drive is currently
an unpaved roadway. See Table 1.9.B: Characteristics of Arterial Streets
within One (1) Mile.
viii. Roadway and Intersection Improvements
The major roadway improvements listed in the adopted 2040 Pima
Association of Govemments Regional Transportation Plan (PAG RTP)
within the project vicinity is the Tangerine Road Corridor Project which
extends from 1-10 to La Canada Drive. Tangerine Road will be widened
to 4-lane divided roadway with bike lanes, multi -use lanes, sidewalks and
appropriate drainage facilities. The project is anticipated to be completed
at incremental phases, between the years of 2011 and 2026.
ix. Existing and Proposed Intersections
There are two existing major intersections on arterial roadways within
one -mile of the site. The closest to the project site is the intersection of
�':� Part I — Inventory and Analysis 1-65
Cresta Morado Rezoning
Tangerine Road and La Cholla Boulevard which is located on the south-
east boundary of the site. The other major intersection within one mile is
east of the site at Tangerine Road and La Canada Drive. As part of the
Tangerine Road Corridor Project, the intersection at Tangerine Road and
La Cholla Boulevard is expected to experience improvements.
X. Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Ways Adjacent to the Site and Their
Connection with Arterial Streets, Parks and Schools
A bike route with a stripped shoulder runs directly adjacent to the site
along Tangerine Road, extending over one mile east and west of the
property. This same type of bike route connects onto La Cholla
Boulevard and extends over one mile south but does not extend north.
Additionally, shared -use bike paths along La Cholla Boulevard link to
the subdivisions southeast of the site providing bicycle access through
the subdivisions to La Canada Drive.
V'V Part I — Inventory and Analysis 1-66
Cresta Morado Rezoning
Exhibit 1.9.A: Traffic
LEGEND
I::] Rezoning Boundary Major Local Roads (Current ROW/Future ROW) y�z1h 0* 1D001 2000'
r 1 Mile Radius Minor Local Roads
1:3 Jurisdictions Bicycle Routes FILENAME EGA trafhc_6z6
SOURCE Pima County GIS. 20td
88 Part I — Inventory and Analysis 1-67
Cresta Morado Rezoning
10. Recreation and Trails
A. Open Space, Recreation Areas, Parks and Trails within One (1) Mile
According to the Pima Regional Trail System (PRTS) Master Plan, there are no existing
trail access points found on the subject property. No proposed trailheads exist within one -
mile of the property. There are several single-track trails within one -mile of the project
site as well as proposed paths and greenways that provide connectivity to surrounding
neighborhoods. There is a plan listed in the PRTS Master Plan for trail improvements
within the project area. The listed trail improvement is for the Tangerine Greenway which
runs on the north side of Tangerine Road, adjacent to the property.
Tangerine Greenway (G050)
The proposed Tangerine Greenway is located along the south side of Tangerine Road
from the Santa Cruz River corridor to the vicinity of Big Wash in the Town of Oro Valley,
a distance of approximately 14.5 miles. This corridor represents a regional link across
the extreme northwest metropolitan area, and connects Big Wash River Park with the
Santa Cruz River Park and the CAP Trail. With construction underway for the widening
of Tangerine Road south of the rezoning area, current plans indicate a paved multi -use
path on the south side of the Tangerine Road right-of-way.
According to the Town of Oro Valley's Parks and Trails map, there are two existing natural
trails within one -mile of the project site. One that runs along La Cholla Boulevard adjacent
to the site and the other runs through the subdivision entitled Verde Ranch, south-east
of the site. See Exhibit 1.10.A: Parks and Trails.
B. Acreage of Parks and Recreation Areas
Pima County and the Town of Oro Valley do not list any parks within one mile of the
project site. The closest park to the subject property is the Naranja Townsite Park which
is located approximately 2.90 miles southeast of the project on Naranja Drive.
G
000 Part I — Inventory and Analysis 1-68
Cresta Morado Rezoning
Exhibit 11.1.1: Parks and Trails
+I"435
t ;
W MOORE RD 17 • ; 4.
_
10 • �— _
16 _ 1 I--- - sr
i-
- O -
- g --A- L Z-
i I '..�� `, it PO
-- I
G050
Poll
j
1. - .W NARANJA DR.
o • �_ --- • t� . -• -
Z Z
Z • ` - F
- Z =
LEGEND
-�, Rezoning Boundary • • •• Pima County Trails Singletrack Trails NORIII
01 �I One -Mile Radius Existing Oro Valley Trails G01 Greenviays `�/ � �' I'`. 10�r
Jurisdictional Boundary Bike Routes FILENAME ECA_Iralls_rec 60
POO 1P01 Paths FILE
Pima County GIS, 2015
'�' Part I — Inventory and Analysis 1-69
Cresta Morado Rezoning
11. Schools
A. Existing and Proposed Schools within One (1) Mile
The subject property lies within the Amphitheater School District. The only school within
one mile of the site is Wilson K-8 School. See Exhibit 1.11.A: Existing and Proposed
Schools. See Exhibit 11.12.0 Amphitheater School District Capacity Letter for more
information regarding which schools that will absorb additional students generated by
this project.
B. Existing and Proposed Schools Serving the Site Not within One (1) Mile
There are a variety of schools located greater than one mile away from the subject site;
all of which may serve the proposed residential subdivision. The schools within closest
proximity to the subject site are as follows: Wilson K-8 (public school) and Ironwood
Ridge High School (public school). See Exhibit 1.11.A: Existing and Proposed Schools.
C
Part I — Inventory and Analysis 1-70
Cresta Morado Rezoning
F—A111 UIL 1. 1 I.M L:A1b L111y dIIU rfUpU,CU OF-11 UNZ
W MOORE RD
1
1 � l
PIMA COUNTY
ORO VALLEY
W TANGERINE RD
ECHOOL ja
j
1
J J 0
m l
I Q
0 ,r
o Z
0 , Q
Z
W NARANJA DR
C \
z IRONWOOD RIDGE
Z, I;ILh *CI;L0L ( Z. L
Z
LEGEND
Rezoning Boundary AMPHITHEATER UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
.oani
One -Mile Radius 1,r , 0 1000 2000'
MARANA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Jurisdictional Boundary
FlLE NAMEANG-01 Schools 6x8
SOURCE: Pena County GIS. 2015
Part I — Inventory and Analysis 1-71
Cresta Morado Rezoning
12. Water
A. Contact Person for Water Service Provider
Table 1.12.A: Water Service Provider Contact information
Name:
Mark Moore
Address:
11000 N La Canada Dr. Oro Valley, AZ 85737
Phone:
520-229-5017
B. Domestic Water Supply if Not Within a Defined Water Service Area.
The site is located within the defined Water Service Area of Oro Valley Water.
13. Sewers
A. Location of Existing Public Sewer
Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (RWRD) indicates that
this project is tributary to the Tres Rios Water Reclamation Facility via the Canada del
Oro Interceptor. Additionally, RWRD has indicated that capacity is currently available in
public sewer G-2011-011, downstream from manhole 3123-06. Refer to Exhibit
1.13.A.1: RWRD Capacity Letter.
Exhibit 1.13.A.2: Existing Public Sewers demonstrates the location of existing public
sewers in relation to the project site.
,C 07) Part I — Inventory and Analysis 1-72
Cresta Morado Rezoning
Exhibit 1.13.A.1: RWRD Capacity Letter
oft
PIMA COUNTY
WASTEWATER RECLAMATION
JACKSON JENKINS 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE PH: (520) 724-6500
DIRECTOR TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 FAX: (520) 724-9635
Lexy Wellot
The Planning Center
2 E Congress #600
Tucson, AZ 85701
December 8, 2017
Sewerage Capacity Investigation No. 2017-246 Type I
RE: Episcopal Church of Apostles Rezone, Parcel 21942016B
Estimated Flow 11,880 gpd (ADWF).
P 17WC00245.
Greetings:
The above referenced project is tributary to the Tres Rios Water Reclamation Facility via the Canada del Oro
Interceptor.
Capacity is currently available for a project this size in the public sewer G-2011-011, downstream from manhole
3123-06.
This letter is not a reservation or commitment of treatment or conveyance capacity for this project. It is not an
approval of point and method of connection. It is an analysis of the system as of this date.
If further information is needed, please feel free to contact us at (520) 724-6607.
Reviewed by: Kurt Stemm, CEA Sr.
�0 Part I — Inventory and Analysis 1-73
Cresta Morado Rezoning
Exhibit 1.13.A.2: Existing Public Sewers
knap.ry: Pletom�try, Yt)1 &
O-
O
U
SUNKIST RD SUNKIST RD
6
� z
j
ME OEM
�1
J
W
°
2
1�.
0
0
Q
O
Z
W
_LL
J
Q
U
�
TANGERINE
RD
s>
Manhole # 3123-06
_=- G-2011-011
$++ sewer
ll
1 G-2011-011
a
1
J
J
_
l
+
l
\
U
f
W/
C Z
° r�"i "' • k
u g
GLOVER RD
>
LEGEND
Notes:
Rezoning Boundary
Project Site is located at:
NUMTH 01
8W
Township 11S, Range 13E,
Section 33
Jurisdictional Boundaries
Acreage: Approx. 21.92 AC
Existing Sewer Network
Parcel ID #: 219-42-016B
FILE NAME ANG 01_Sewer W
g
SOURCE
Pena County GIS, 2016
0 Existing Sewer Manhole
00 Part I — Inventory and Analysis 1-74
Cresta Morado Rezoning
14. McHarg Composite Map
A. Composite Map
Information regarding topography, hydrology, vegetation, wildlife and views have been
combined to form the McHarg Composite Map, shown in Exhibit 1.4.A. The purpose of
the McHarg Composite Map is to highlight areas that are available for development.
Refer to Part II - Land Use Proposal for more information on how the site plan responds
to the site's physical constraints.
Exhibit 1.14.A: McHarg Composite Map shows the overlap and/or interaction of the
following site opportunities and constraints as applicable to the site:
Topography:
i. "Hillside Natural Areas"
ii. Rock outcrops
iii. Slopes equal or greater than 15%
Hydrology:
i. 100-year floodplains with discharge equal or greater than 50 cfs.
ii. Areas of sheet flooding deeper than one (1) foot
iii. Federally mapped floodways and floodplains
Vegetation:
i.
Areas of medium and high vegetation density
ii.
Federally listed Threatened or Endangered Species
iii.
Saguaros and other visually prominent cacti
iv.
Areas where vegetation facilitates soil stabilization
Wildlife:
i. Wildlife habitat as identified in Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised Section
27.4
Viewsheds:
i. Areas on -site that are highly visible from off -site locations.
C5)
too Part I — Inventory and Analysis 1-75
Cresta Morado Rezoning
Exhibit 1.14.A: McHarg Composite Map
-- I LIMEWOOD OR
Z8U
rge'
2�9jA :A-" �` x6 y•-r+L�
g%$$ w Iw rr.cwl ;�
o J��,
:t
r` _j
. f
WWI
-
,.
l - twi
TANGERINE RD
41.
x 2'y.e1 4s4 5 i� .
4
0' 150, 300':
� . a i ♦ �' Aid,. # .�
FILE NAM : ANG-01 ,,h.,g_6x8mxd
SOU CE: Pima County GIS, 2017
LEGEND
MIRezoning Boundary 15-17% slopes - 25-32% splopes 0 Peak Discharge Area
® Significant Vegetation 18-19% slopes - Greater than 33% slopes - High Visibility
---- 2' Elevation Contours 20-24% slopes - Medium Visibility
Flow Line Low Visibility
Part I — Inventory and Analysis 1-76
Cresta Morado Rezoning
1. Project Overview
A. Tentative Development Plan
The Cresta Morado rezoning and concurrent General Plan amendment establishes the
framework for the development of approximately 54 single family detached homes within
the Town of Oro Valley, Pima County Arizona in Township 11S Range 13E, Section 33.
The subject rezoning area is approximately 22.22 acres of a 29.91-acre property located at
the northwest corner of La Cholla Boulevard and Tangerine Road. The proposed rezoning
responds to the inventory and analysis, technical research and the values of the community
through the use of regulations and controls to resolve any potential development -related
issues while appropriately responding to and considering adopted plans, adjacent
development, the environment and site -specific conditions.
Proposed Land Use, Principal and Accessory Uses, Square Footage, Height
and Floor Area Ratio (FAR)
The proposed rezoning is for the development of 54 single family detached
residences surrounding the existing Episcopal Church of the Apostles with a
density of 2.43 residences per acre. The subject proposal also contemplates
providing approximately 44 percent open space, including a recreation area and
appropriate landscape buffering and screening around the perimeter of the
rezoning area.
In accordance with the Town of Oro Valley Zoning Code, the proposed homes
will be limited to a maximum height of 25-feet, up to two stories, with the
exception of lots 1-9 (as shown on Exhibit 11.1.A: Tentative Development Plan)
which will be limited to a maximum height of 18 feet or a single -story due to the
Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District (TRCOD). Per discussions with
adjacent neighbors west of Como Drive regarding preservation of views toward
Pusch Ridge, lots 22-25, 49 and 50 as shown on the Tentative Development
Plan have also been designated single -story. Lots 16 and 54 will also be single -
story per the Town's Residential Design Standards, with additional single -story
limitations imposed during platting. Lots will vary in size, but the typical lot size
will be 60' x 120' with a 7,000-square-foot minimum.
ii. Conformity with General Plan and the General Plan Future Land Use Map
In order for the proposed rezoning to be in conformance with Your Voice, Our
Future, a Type 2 minor amendment is requested to concurrently redesignate
the subject rezoning area from "Public/Semi-Public" to "Medium Density
Residential (MDR)". Upon approval, the development will conform to the
requested land use as set forth in Your Voice, Our Future and the General Plan
Future Land Use Map.
�Cm7
4'6 Part 11 - Land Use Proposal II-78
Cresta Morado Rezoning
According to Your Voice, Our Future, land uses classified as MDR should be
located close to schools, shopping centers and employment opportunities. A
portion of the amendment area is adjacent to a land use that is designated as
Neighborhood Commercial/ Office and is also designated as a Tier 2 Growth
Area by the Town of Oro Valley Land Use Map. The amendment area and
subsequent requested land use are ideally situated and complement the
existing Neighborhood Commercial/Office use. The requested amendment
area will also serve as a transition of uses from the more intense neighborhood
commercial to the Rural Low Density Residential north and west of the site.
iii. Proposed Flexible Development Provisions or Conservation Subdivision Design
The proposed tentative development plan includes a flexible design option to
modify the R1-7 minimum lot width from 70 feet to 60 feet. All lots will still meet
the R1-7 minimum lot size of 7,000 square feet with the requested modification.
A large buffer between Cresta Morado and existing homes to the west, along
with single -story restrictions and architectural design, will help ensure
compatibility with nearby homes and minimize view impacts.
'� Part 11 — Land Use Proposal II-79
Cresta Morado Rezoning
Exhibit ILIA: Tentative Development Plan
TENTATIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
CRESTA
MORADO-`
--TT
m i
t%+NGERINE RD
���
. —.. I � �.
BUFFER YARD A 10 RED10 DRAINAGE
30 PROVIDED EASEMENT (TYP) -
77
BUFFER YARD A ISREO. J
IT PROVIDEDAND ESOS
ADJACENT TO PROPERTY LINE
RECREATION AREA
OF ZONING CFODE
I �
17 DRAINAGE I y
EASEMENT(TYP)
t LOT-
-Lai
20 om
r
i
Q I -- fj
• ., ,.. `%LOT � � - - = /`
BUFFERYARDAISREQ✓ �I
30 PROVIDED I 3�' I , [✓A
ACCESS ALIGNED TO
PROPOSED VICTORY WORSHIP
I LOTS
r 1 ry
ACCESS LIMITED TO1�f793
RIGHT IN LEFT OUT ONLY
GATED ENTRY - %Lc LOTS-0
- - - LIMITED TO MAX HTT.
PROPOSEDSEWERAUGNMENT OF IV PERTRCOO
TI-IEPLANNINGCENTER
o drys+on of JPC Grout/ Ina
� oarq. a v<Irll AA m,u w.�T"S.'�:iS•3S?.'SL1�' T•.� r•.s'r ontoccvn
BUFFER YARD A 10 RED.
'a
LIMEWOOD DR PROVIDED PROPOSED SEWER ALIGNMENT
1,204 a —
r/- BUFFER YARD A 10 RED.
1 � � I I � 10' PROVIDED AND ESOS
LOT r ADJACENT TO PROPERTY LINE
1 n II 40
��... �� ._ ., _.._..-� �„•. .-.�.•'i PROPOSED GATED ACCESS
I I I I LOT30
EKISTINGEPISCOPAL E7OSTiNGACCESS TOLACMOLLA
CHURCH CC THC AT`OETLCE i% BOVLEVARD(TOREMAIN)
CHURCH (TO REMAI N)
�r \` ri MATCI BJNC ..CC CI ICCT T L1
_ 1 r • _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET T 1-2 0
— —
�DETENTIONBASN
'fc Ifr`'lL� r I _
I 1 ( 9Me
•$
J , 2a DRAINAGE
e., EASEMENT PEDESTRIAN TRAIL CONNECTION
r 1 I 1 • - ' DETENTION BASIN TO MULTI -USE PATH ON SOUTH
1 r . 2V MAX DEPTH ' WWI_ sN- IAN ULKINt KU.AU
' I _ • NATURAL FINSH
�TRCOD W SETBACK • :/ -
BUFFER YARD B 2T RED.
50PRMDED
TANGERINE RD Aen
xxf I1 IV
SE4 SE4 EXC RDS 29 9 AC
TONNSHP 1150LITH RANGE 13 EAST. SECTION 33
GSSRB6M TOWM OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA
LOCATION MAP
SCALE 3' • 1 MILE
SHEET INDEX:
COVER THIS SHEET
TENTATIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN T1.1
TLNTATM DEVELOPMENT PLAN T12
SEWER ALIGNMENT SIA
SUBMITTAL HISTORY:
1ST 412118 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
2ND 8114118 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
GENERAL NOTES
I. Zorarg Ile etistirg rm Ls RI.1". the proposed zo, g isRl-7.
2 Ta Coda Pamdc21Sa211168
3. Area: In project area is aFprorkneldy 2222 aver
4 Land Use Vaears
S Th, Plan is WO M in raaaa and u4ea to Mange. AN proaded inkumaton and
loyest Is ssE)ed to charge w1h the final plot.
H Areas
a. Grosassearea: 2222AC
0 Tar area to be Gwded: 16.02 AC
e Taal EnWonnareaey Serndiw Open Space: 5.6 AC
d. LaMsospe and Esd.ms: 3.6 AC
e. Re.b-area: OBOAC
7. TyPcal Iota isspprocmahry T.000sF
d Tygeal lol dimension "W'.120
9. Proposed dwasy is 24 rndemes per acre (RAC)
LEGEND
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
TRCOO SETBACK
—���---�--�--�— LOTUNES
PARCEL LINES
MIATCH LINE
FYY:J..4C1. ANG01
... ..__
DATE 0114113
Ci:aWN 9v_CJL _
CHECYFD BY FW
CALL iNK)WORK1W,
DAYS BEFORE YOU DC,
6C2-263-110a
1874SAkE 1T
COl nSCf
•A&WCOPA COLiN7Y)
i
VVVK1_IS SLMV. As — 1 ATE
iREVISED PER COMMENTS 14'6/16---
I
CCED.RiANf. aFRKANt OWME7.
f•1rgU Center ?fn flOrY•cO Ce^aer Eprepol 7rr_h of lfa
C Iry FiQ
Or—
C.O, rood C.O. Bros trrusrwooa s
2 f Coraou 1600 2 E Cerm7oss 16M C.O. Dotva Ash
7uc AZ e5701 1--m AZ 85701 P.O. 11- 60435
iut9xl. A: f573?
4 _
t
F _ _ ... .. ". 1 .....
I
:pPAL-fNC+?EY;WI.rC..F?F•Ov.4;C:p'. NOT FOR ,',GVSTFJCffOt. NO"FCVBICDUNG
ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE OPEN SPACE (ESOS)
LANDSCAPE AND BUFFER AREAS
HOMES LIMITED TO ONE-STORY
TENTATIVE DEVELOPMENT C"Mb
PLAN OV17C2583
CREsTA MORADO RE7ERE^GE:
CQiE2
![t%4D.:r S2;9AC 1 [F 4
EC
08 Part 11 — Land Use Proposal II-80
Cresta Morado Rezoning
B. General Plan Future Land Use Designations
As previously mentioned, a Type 2 minor general plan amendment will be processed
concurrently with this rezoning application. As depicted in Exhibit 11.2.B: Modified General
Plan Future Land Use Designations, the rezoning area will be designated as MDR while
the remaining portions of the property (outside of the rezoning area) will maintain the future
land use designations of Public/Semi-Public and Neighborhood Commercial/Office.
C. Proposed Land Uses, Principal and Accessory Uses
As shown on Exhibit Il.1.C: Tentative Development Plan, the subject rezoning proposes
fifty-five (54) detached single family homes on approximately 22.22 acres surrounding the
existing Episcopal Church of the Apostles. In addition to the single family residential use,
the subject rezoning proposal features approximately 9.78 acres of open space which
consists of environmentally sensitive open space onsite as well as a recreation area and
landscaping and necessary buffer yards. R1-7 accessory uses will be permitted in Cresta
Morado.
C`
W Part 11 — Land Use Proposal II-81
Cresta Morado Rezoning
Exhibit 11.2.13: Modified General Plan Future Land Use Designations
LEGEND General Plan Designations
Rezoning Boundary Rural Low Density Residential (0 - 0.3 DU/AC) + 0, s00• 1000,
1 114 Mile Radius _ Low Density Residential (0.4 - 1.2 DU/AC)
Low Density Residential (1-3 - 2.0 DUlAC) RL[NAME ANG-01_gen plan_6X8
Jurisdictional Boundaries - souRce P.r,a county cls, 2016
Medium Density Residential (2.1 - 5 DU/AC) - School Oro Valley GIS.2017
j Neighborhood Commercial / Office Public / Semi -Public
Cv Part 11 — Land Use Proposal II-82
Cresta Morado Rezoning
2. Existing Land Uses
A. Zoning and Existing Land Uses on Adjacent Properties
Zoning of surrounding properties is depicted in Exhibit 1.1.C.i in Part I - Inventory and
Analysis and include:
North: Pima County SR (Suburban Ranch)
South: R1-144 (Single -Family Residential District), R1-7 (Single
Family Residential District), R1-36 (Single Family Residential
District) and R1-20 (Single Family Residential District)
East: C-N (Neighborhood Commercial District) and C-1
(Commercial District) & R1-144 (Single-family Residential
District)
West: R1-144 (Single -Family Residential District)
The land uses of surrounding properties are depicted in Exhibit 1.1.B: Existing Land Uses
provided in Part I — Inventory and Analysis and include:
North: Single Family Residential
South: Vacant, Rancho De Plata, Rancho Del Cobre
East: Vacant (proposed neighborhood commercial — Mercado
Mandarina), Single Family Residential
West: Single Family Residential, Victory Worship Center
B. Effect of Proposed Development on Existing Land Uses On -site and Off -site
Land Uses within the vicinity of the site consist predominantly of a mix of vacant land and
single-family residences. Located immediately west of the rezoning area are large lot
single-family residences and the Victory Worship Center. Currently, the Victory Worship
Center is one-story; however, it is in preliminary design stages for future expansion. North
of the subject rezoning area are large lot residences. South of the rezoning area are vacant
parcels and residential subdivisions such as Rancho de Plata and Rancho del Cobre.
Rancho del Plata consists of 50 one- and two-story single-family residences with a density
of 2.57 residences per acre. Rancho del Cobre features 68 single family residences with
a density of 1.12 units per acre. Immediately east of the subject property is vacant land that
is set aside for future commercial use. East of La Cholla is the recently entitled Mercado
Mandarina which features a mixture of retail, office and assisted living residential uses. The
proposed rezoning is similar in size and density to the aforementioned residential
subdivisions.
@1r. Part 11 — Land Use Proposal II-83
Cresta Morado Rezoning
The proposed rezoning will minimize impacts on the existing single-family residences
adjacent to the site by providing large natural buffers and strategically -placed single -story
homes. This will ensure views are not impacted and the new homes are significantly
screened. Additionally, the subject proposal provides a comparable amount of open space
to that provided in the neighboring residential subdivisions. Significant landscape buffering
and environmentally sensitive open space has been provided adjacent to the large lots
along the western property boundary to ensure a sufficient transition. Access to Cresta
Morado will be provided at the existing location along La Cholla Boulevard and a new right
in left out access point on Como Drive. The access point along Como Drive will be
positioned in alignment, or in close alignment, with the Victory Worship Center driveway.
Per the Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District (TRCOD), a 50-foot undevelopable tract
and a single -story limitation has been provided on Lots 1-9 as a means of achieving
aesthetic consistency along the corridor as well as preserving the significant vegetation
located on the property adjacent to Tangerine Road.
3. Environmentally Sensitive Lands
According to the Town of Oro Valley Environmentally Sensitive Lands Map, the subject
property is located within an area categorized as a Tier 2 Resource Management Area
(See Exhibit 11.3: ESL). The Tier 2 Resource Management Area requires that a minimum
of 25% of the total rezoning area be set aside as natural undisturbed open space. As
demonstrated on the Tentative Development Plan, approximately 6.2 acres of the site has
been set aside as environmentally sensitive open space with an additional 2.85 acres of
landscape and buffering and a 0.73-acre recreation area. The total open space provided
onsite is approximately 9.78 acres. Areas to be set aside as ESOS and open space will be
maintained by the established homeowner's association.
Per the Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District, a 50-foot reserved easement tract is
provided for the residential lots adjacent to Tangerine Road. All other setbacks are per the
underlying zoning district.
Similar to the delineated open space areas shown on the Tentative Development Plan,
ESOS areas have been selected based upon connectivity, resource variety, and resource
health. The site contains three main ESOS areas: east side, south side, and west side.
The east ESOS runs along an existing wash and contains healthy, viable riparian habitat.
This ESOS area and wash connect to a Critical Resource Area on the south side of
Tangerine Road. The southern ESOS runs parallel to Tangerine Road and provides
east/west connectivity to either side of the project. The west ESOS connects to existing
open space areas beyond the project site. This area also preserves an area of healthy,
viable upland habitat.
The total acreage present on -site for each conservation category is included in Table 11.3.F.
r
W Part 11 — Land Use Proposal I1-84
Cresta Morado Rezoning
Table 11.3.F: Acreages for Conservation Categories and ESOS
Conservation
Category
Total Area of
Project
Minimum
ESOS
Required
Total ESOS
Provided
Total ESOS
Percentage
Major Wildlife
Linkage
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
Critical
Resource Area
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
Core Resource
Area
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
RMA Tier 1
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
RMA Tier 2
1 22.22
1 5.54 AC 25%
6.2 AC
28%
RMA Tier 3
0 1
N/A
N/A
N/A
Total
ESOS Provided
6.2 AC
28%
0,`1
OuPart 11 — Land Use Proposal II-85
Cresta Morado Rezoning
+ 4
NV
Pima County+.
Drive
203 204
20 16 02
200
O
Tanaerine Road
209
O
208
0N,'207
206
205
O
Exhibit 11.3: ESL
a
LEGEND — — -
Rezoning Boundary Resource Management Area Tier 1 (66% open space) o- rW) 1000,
QJurisdictions Resource Management Area Tier 2 (25% open space) L
Distinctive individual Plants Resource Management Area Tier 3 (0% open space) FILENAME: ANG-01_ESL_6x8.mxd
°r o SOURCE Pima County GIS, 2016
Critical Resource Area Categ
ory (95 /o open space) Oro valley GIS, 2017
Part 11 — Land Use Proposal II-86
Cresta Morado Rezoning
4. Topography
A. Tentative Development Plan's Response to Site Topography
The tentative development plan is laid out in a manner that is conducive to the topography
and appropriate to adjacent uses. Due to its relatively flat character and lack of challenging
topographic constraints, the subject property is highly suitable for development as a single-
family residential community utilizing the proposed R1-7 zoning. The development of this
property can occur using the grading standards contained within Section 27.9, Grading of
the Oro Valley Zoning Code.
B. Areas of Encroachment onto Slopes
The areas on the site proposed for development are located entirely within areas
characterized by slopes of less than 15%. The limited areas on the site containing slopes
of greater than 15% are located within Environmentally Sensitive Open Space and will
remain undisturbed.
C. "Hillside Conservation Areas"
There are no areas on the site that meet the Hillside Area category as defined in the
Environmentally Sensitive Lands (ESL) regulations. As such, there are no areas on the site
designated as Hillside Conservation Areas.
D. On -site Grading
Approximately 16+/- acres (72%) of the site will be disturbed and graded, while 6.2+/- acres
(28%) of the site will be left in its natural condition. The area of disturbance/grading
includes the lots, local street right-of-way, residential open space, and drainage
easements. Final grading limits will be established in a grading plan to be prepared during
the design review process required by the Town of Oro Valley.
5. Cultural/Archeological/Historic Resources
In June of 2017, a Class III survey of the project area was conducted by EPG as part of a due
diligence study. Their findings concluded there were no indications of local, regional or national
prehistorical or historical significance on the property; therefore, no additional surveys or
treatment plans are necessary. However, in the instance that artifacts or remains are uncovered
during the construction process, construction shall come to a halt and a certified archaeologist
shall be consulted.
A copy of EPG Cultural Resource Services Technical Paper No. 2017-27 has been included
under a separate cover.
6. Hydrology
�' Part 11 — Land Use Proposal II-87
Cresta Morado Rezoning
A. Tentative Development Plan Response to Hydrologic Conditions
There are six mapped watersheds of varying sizes that impact the north property line.
Concentration Point 1.11 is unaltered with this development plan and will continue to be
conveyed down Como Drive. Concentration Point 1.12 has a thread under existing conditions
that would clip the proposed lot at the northwest corner of the development. The 100-year
peak discharge is only approximately 2 CFS in localized grading will drain that to the west to
combine with the flow from Concentration Point 1.11. The initial path to the coalescence point
is all that has changed.
Concentration Points 1.21 and 1.22 generate 100-year peak discharges of approximately 30
CFS and 22 CFS respectively. It is proposed that 10-foot easements be provided between
lots to accept the off -site flow. There will be a Gunite channel between the walls of the lots
and will be conveyed under the local road via a 30-inch and 24-inch CMP respectively.
Between the adjacent lots south of the road there will be another 10-foot easement to collect
the off -site water and convey it to a 10-foot bottom width Gunite-lined collector channel
between the lots in the parking of the existing church. The channel could will convey water
into a basin located at Concentration Point 1.9.
Concentration Point 1.5 will drain an area of approximately 4.57 acres which will consist of
approximately 18 homes and the street while generating a 100-year peak discharge of
approximately 35 CFS. Stormwater runoff will be collected in a Neenah vein grate that
extends across the street and drains into a 10-foot easement. The easement will have a
Gunite line channel that coalesces with the off -site channel from Concentration Point 1.6
which drains into the basin at Concentration Point 1.9.
Concentration Point 2.1 will drain an area of approximately 3.45 acres and generated a 100-
year peak discharge of approximately 28 CFS. The stormwater runoff will be intercepted from
the street be a combination of curb inlet and grates. Stormwater runoff will enter a 20-foot
easement with a Gunite lined channel that will empty into a shallow basin at Concentration
Points 2 and 3 where the water will be metered to below the predeveloped conditions for the
2-yr, 10-yr, and 100-yr discharge. Depressed curbs will be used to drain the streets at
Concentration Points 1.7. The use of 18" to 24" CMP pipes will drain the water under the
road at 5.21. Curb inlets will be used to drain the streets at 4.13 and 5.2. The off -site
stormwater runoff at Concentration Points 4.14 and 4.15 will use to 30-inch CMP pipes under
the road to convey the water. Concentration Points 1.3 and 1.4 will drain into Como Drive
without attenuation.
There will be three (3) detention basins located on site such that the combined attenuated
peak discharge will be below existing levels at Concentration Points 1.9, 2 and 3. See Exhibit
11.6.1: Post Development Hydrology
B. Substantiate any Modification of Drainage Patterns
G Part 11 — Land Use Proposal II-88
Cresta Morado Rezoning
The development of the homes around the existing church and parking will overlay the
floodplain for Concentration Point 1.2. The contributions of the off -site watershed will be
intercepted as they enter the site and controlled in drainage easements and channels to a
collection basin used for detention at Concentration Point 1.9. It will be directed through a
weir outlet into a drainage channel between two of the proposed lots and conveyed to a
second shallow basin along the southern boundary where the runoff will be metered out to
the existing discharge locations along the southern property line. All other regulatory
floodplains will remain the same.
C. Map Drainage Impacts
This development is located within a critical basin therefore all stormwater runoff exiting the
property at the southern boundary is required to be released at the pre -developed levels are
below. Therefore, there will be no impacts to off -site land uses downstream or upstream.
D. Describe & Map Engineering & Design Features Used for Mitigation
The collection of water from off -site will be conveyed in Gunite channels to eliminate the
erosion between lots for the concentrated flow. This will incorporate the runoff from
Concentration Points 1.21 and 1.22. The stormwater runoff within the development will be
conveyed within the streets and intercepted via a Neenah vein grate used as a trench grate
across the road, or curb inlets and grates. Stormwater runoff will be conveyed under the
roads via CMP pipes and discharge into concrete channels or rock riprap splash pads.
The parcel is located within a critical basin and there will be a detention basin located at
Concentration Point 1.9 and as shallow basin at Concentration Points 2 and 3. The outlet
structures for the basins will typically be concrete weirs that will be designed to reduce the
flow for the 2 —, 10 —, and 100 — year events to be below the pre -developed conditions. The
outlet structure for Concentration Point 1.9 will discharge into a Gunite channel between the
lots and conveyed to the basin at Concentration Points 2 and 3. There will be weirs located
within the shallow basins at Concentration Points 2 and 3 that will meter the flow to be below
the existing conditions for the 2 —, 10 —, 100 — year events such that the flows will be divided
between Concentration Points 1.2, 2 and 3.
E. Describe Conformance to Area & Basin Management Plans
The design for the tentative development plan conforms to the area plans, basin
management plans in town policies as follows. The development is located within a critical
basin and is required to reduce the 2 —, 10 —, and 100- year peak discharges to be below the
existing conditions. The original development plan for the church was approved prior to the
incorporation of the area into a balanced basin and was only required to provide five-year
threshold retention. Therefore, the existing conditions represent the levels to which detention
must be set as targets. The five-year threshold retention volume provided for the church
previously will be accommodated into the plan for the basins at Concentration Points 1.9 and
the shallow basin at Concentration Point 2 and 3. Further, within each of these basins the 1 st
flush requirements will be provided.
,c 7
VV Part 11 — Land Use Proposal II-89
Cresta Morado Rezoning
All the drainage structures that includes curb inlets, culverts, channels, grates and inlet
structures will be designed to the Pima County regional flood control District and the town of
Oro Valley's hydraulic design standards. The 100-year peak discharges were all evaluated
using the Pima County's PC — Hydro interactive program.
�►�! Part 11 — Land Use Proposal II-90
LLJ
, •
.
')
-
(.J%i!
• .,•••A
/�
'li� tl
(�`
,.
`Sf
J: r: utP7>X� �.r
J+/Syy- 1
p
O
r
'
LIMEW❑❑D DRIVE
,q
1
7
rc• ram,
1
0
.�
ll
�� I��h �4 v ,_ �h., �Y; ..
,;
s
roil F�•r � n
�
4
et
�... . rL•GJ'I
•i
�
,.%'
� i r _
I - F ,:
1� � 1: 1 ,�
ty � T d �,.
�
•
_i
"�f "' ail" �:� {Y`(/ d v o I ,..,^,.- rr '`x; � ° i ,' •5� ` r �s,.'¢P
7•
t� .$ � tl. .� •'ti �r. rr;-i dit'(• , I° ;�'e u e.) K_ •N• ,� I .�`1pp ..1, 1 �f I `L` t 1 j 3"
♦a. ,1M.� >v � ) e �= Q. li'v 't..' �' � � if Y i :,',, � a ) ' � � t
q. � . �'�� � � `�I.,�I'" .y �j. � (` '•1': { 1 J7C ar:, 7'.I'` .wr•. .� � f�( j i" S - i
J;. (ln^ti SIX !ff �. ) °� � / 1 S �1�-' p .=u�c-. •1 ($ l Y.
A • ,r'�yA1 \ 1 '
Wit„ • � ♦,f � a° '' It T t �tr ' � .'. �'`� 1 i.8 u�, . r ,� } ti 'iaP sr } 4 t t' l � F
4tU °U l(���' Z1. 1: p0 �. � �1 `b V,. .. - f�.tN•^ 1'-i /�lr,.l � ,•}4 C7 lC,u�, ... � �F S � •i .rl,\.
e / i o � � _ ■ t qa�,,,-5 � f rr
�..,,. .. ti J � �� Flo tyy,� a 0 �_'�' �nv `Fi` �, -�'� �.l� ��t � 1 > `� 'r•� �`" .� � � (�.
wr:.�. � '."1 'y s.� I f'T "'+ y • '-'ram'. '. Q 4^i:y i � ° � f
!''�•" ..., •Y.. 4.•,} � '... i m i 1 •� �- f ✓ P ) i 1 nr d 1
-(ro, � t�'�y:! �..r• °p �1° � �� � ♦ Su ' 4 1.. t� _�' � Y % f y, i' �ry=.y
73111
+ i ' 1' °(H fU�„r�x• ),
.,� 1t' ,1' .t. `v:♦�'' 11 ,, '"brj> `� ��'�7� :� r p
�+..,,f% � .-x 5 ,-� v.. oa' ./� �. � . •n tt n•,,t!•� � `Y �v •arl .f'1.,�, �".
�y i•'.,.y�• ^ 'tij] ty I = � p' � r bx � r°�' 1 �7� (,u � Q' rl�' � � � S. � � �..
" ��>r ,.�G�'""",",p�' fir,. � . 1 - L i t •'� �� '� r
`t a
1.2
s
} 9 d
J
v
TANGERINE ROAD
0' 200' 400' 600' _---....... ._
TABLE OF 100-YEAR PEAK DISCHARGES
C P
Area Cac)
0100 (cfs)
lx
35.18
158,4
1.1
12.91
56.8
1.11
8.82
47.5
1,12
0.30
1.9
1.2
0.50
3.2
121
4.83
29.9
1.22
4.11
21.5
1.3
0.23
22
1.4
0.73
4,5
1.5
4.57
34.8
1.6
12.28
62.2
L7
0.87
BA
1,8
0.27
2.0
1.9
19.14
114.5
2.OW
1118
11.1
2.1
3,45
27.7
4E
1,85
11,5
3(I(
L10
7.6
4(I(
17.05
75,7
4.1
11.47
55.6
4.11
8.55
43.0
4.12
0.30
1.9
4.13
1.45
11.0
4.14
10.02
46.3
4.15
9.61
46.0
5
6.01
38.7
5.1
1.21
1113
5.2
1.33
9.5
5.21
0.94
6,7
KEYNOTES
10' DRAINAGE EASEMENT. RECTANGULAR GUNITE CHANNEL BW=8'
�2 30-INCH CMP
Q 24-INCH CMP
NEENAH VAIN TRENCH GRATE
DEPRESSED CURB
20' DRAINAGE EASEMENT. RECTANGULAR GUNITE CHANNEL BW=16, DEPTH=2'
GRADE TO DRAIN
QB 2 CELL 30-INCH CMP
9C% GUNITE CHANNEL, BW=10', DEPTH=1'-2', SLOPE TO BE DETERMINED
t0 RETENTION/DETENTION BASIN, PROVIDE 1ST FLUSH REQUIREMENTS
SIZE AND CONFIGURATION TO BE DETERMINED WITH GRADING.
�i OUTLET WEIRS TO BE METERED TO PRE -DEVELOPED CONDITIONS FOR
2-, 10- AND 100-YEAR CONDITIONS.
LEGEND
1.1 Concentration Point Flow Line
Watershed Boundary
■OBA00115
DRAINAGE CONCEPT
ENGINEERING, LLC
1°01T" KeeM�
CHURCH OF THE APOSTLES
D
V n
ph" (520;STUM Fmj=)S0040M
PARCEL ID: 219.42-MB
IOtltNa,ler Ny0W1IlIIMu1�
BEING AFORTICN OF SECTION 3i,
T•I I•S, R.Im' OJLBA(N. TORN OF ON VALLEY,PSM COUNTY, ARIZONA
BOOARDW PROJECT NO.:
514JEET
spanBl6
vT.alar•ao(D
I
REVISE LAYOUT
S/2S/2015
I,
OF
•70P
CI ,. r
1
n
(D
rn
0
v
Q
O
70
N
O
Z3
M
(a
Cresta Morado Rezoning
7. Vegetation
This site contains ESL categories. Vegetation will be preserved, transplanted or mitigated per
Zoning Code requirements. Areas determined to be ESOS will be set -aside according to
regulations in 27.10 of the Oro Valley Code
The need for additional hydrology within the CCV area adjacent to Tangerine Road will
necessitate impacts, however impacts to CCV will be kept to a minimum where ever possible.
Impacts to CCV for hydrologic issues is an allowed disturbance based on Town of Oro Valley
Code. In the instance that CCV is impacted, CCV will be mitigated in accordance with Town of
Oro Valley code. Areas within the CCV that are not impacted and lack vegetation or the existing
vegetation is in a state of decline as determined by the project landscape architect, will require
additional landscaping. Additional landscaping will be naturalistic and meet all Town of Oro Valley
requirement for low water usage and native species.
8. Wildlife
Protection of wildlife and encouraging the continued habitation of the site will be accomplished
with a multi -tiered approach. This approach will consist of preservation, rehabilitation, and
mitigation. Field work, carried out over multiple visits to the site identified areas of property with
the highest quality existing vegetation. These areas and additional space in excess of the
required set -aside requirements will be permanently maintained as open space. Rehabilitation
and enhancements of existing preservation areas will be another component of wildlife
protection. Areas of previous disturbance located in preservation areas will be revegetated to a
natural state. This will be accomplished with a combination of plantings and hydroseeding.
Preservation areas adjacent to disturbance areas will undergo a very sensitive vegetation
enhancement process. Mitigation of habitat is the final process in encouraging long-term wildlife
habitation of the site.
9. Viewsheds
A. Describe and Map how DP mitigates Impacts to:
Views and Vistas from Off -site
Views and vistas from off -site will not be impacted by this development. Two
prominent views exist through the site. The first is north to the Tortolita
mountains, and the second is east towards Pusch Ridge and the Catalina
Mountains. The view of the Tortolita Mountains from Tangerine Road looks
over the site. Tangerine Road is higher in grade than the area of the site
adjacent to the road. Additionally, the TRCOD and ESOS protect existing
vegetation buffering the foreground. Views of Pusch Ridge will be maintained
via view corridors created by open space setbacks and restrictions on the total
i7)
000 Part 11 — Land Use Proposal II-92
Cresta Morado Rezoning
number, and placement, of two-story homes. Building locations and elevations
will be minimized to accommodate adjacent views.
ii. Areas of High Visibility
Areas of high visibility are mitigated by providing extensive natural landscape
buffers. The provided buffers will be larger than the required natural landscape
buffer to maintain existing visual qualities. Areas of the buffer that are thin or
showing signs of distress and decay will be enhanced with existing vegetation
transplanted from disturbance areas. Architectural and design qualities of the
development will be sensitive to the surrounding desert color palette and blend
naturally into the existing vegetation.
iii. Construction Mitigation
Any undisturbed areas and ESOS will be protected during grading and
construction activities in accordance with 27.10.F.3.a of the Oro Valley Zoning
Code. Spillover grading for roadways and residential lots adjacent to ESOS will
be contained within the 15-foot ESOS setback per Oro Valley Zoning Code
section 27.10.F.3.b and revegetated per Town standards.
B. Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District (TRCOD) Additional Information
Proposed Architectural Style, Materials and Color
The overall architectural design shall exhibit a coordinated and unified theme
which reinforces the southwestern vernacular found on adjacent properties and
typical to Oro Valley. Design elements, such as signage, landscaping,
screening, lighting, and monumentation will be themed to create a unified style
complimentary to the area. Mechanical equipment will be fully screened from
public view. Architectural details will enhance structures, provide articulation,
and prevent a monotonous facade. Cresta Morado will use materials, shapes,
details and colors that are similar with surrounding architecture.
Architectural Vignettes
See Exhibit 11.9.B.ii: Conceptual Elevations. Elevations are provided for
representation only and separate approval is required.
t'i
too Part 11 — Land Use Proposal II-93
a .fillAT4B�vl.�x•sw, u� ': F.H.
J.
�J�l1 �',i/} �� �� � ��'' � Y� �� �. Al ; �•
5
I.
•
inimmi
IiR �
�7� - ISI� p1r > i p1�Bir 1. I YB Sol
KAM 0,11 &� �E Btl�YB B6
�.',. __- ! i9 I BBB■ lYBfaY '• '—
t •
_
L>N gtir Qr�'ppr. •lMBIR� I� at llu ,`„•?. }p(` .
r..nG#��114111141011�����G����Rt6nZoir �s..f Y�"a �°
pAB.� ♦ CBiy It it M • I Bata t B Ntr.� ' - rh.. . " f i6pB�t{++fL� ggjy i. i°e �. i ..
r. •�%iitt, +:itCi�Eet ,;:.`$��e:::ides::a:e�ie:eaiiei���:i�i•�9r•,—�i.w_�� r ''"� i"'"°�11�^'-� _ Itw�i:�F', 1 >{: �►si�iii�{f�SlIG�B;iLkP SE•`�°°�a�y
Eli
G, wk
r
Cresta Morado Rezoning
10. Traffic
A. Traffic Analysis Report
A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) has been prepared by Kimley Horn and Associates and
submitted under separate cover. The TIA includes all information required under section
10.A Traffic of the Oro Valley Rezoning Process Guide.
B. Ownership, on -street rights -of -way, & Roadway Section
Streets in the proposed development will be built to Town of Oro Valley standards and
specifications for widths, elevations, and required amenities. This includes but is not limited
to paving, curbing, and sidewalks. Currently, the street system is planned to have one main
gated access point and one fire access point. The gated community and associated streets
will be private. If the community is not gated, the streets will be dedicated to the Town of Oro
Valley.
C. Proposed Bicycle and Pedestrian Circulation
Bicycle and pedestrian pathways within the development will be constructed to Town of Oro
Valley standards and specifications. There are sidewalks for pedestrian use on either side
of the roadway that will be the primary circulation system within the development. Adequate
space within the road way will also be usable for cyclist. Access to external streets, paths
and sidewalks will be provided via gated access at multiple points throughout the
development. Final locations for gated pedestrian access points will be determined during
the final development stage. In addition to sidewalks, there is also a pedestrian trail that will
connect the multi -use path on Tangerine Road to the development and the existing church.
The pedestrian trail will be accessible to all residents and is strategically placed adjacent to
future commercial property.
4'V Part 11 — Land Use Proposal II-95
Cresta Morado Rezoning
11. Recreation/Trails
A. Access to off -site Trails
The proposed development will provide trail access to the future multi -use path on Tangerine
Road. The asphalt path is under construction along the south side of Tangerine Road. A trail
connection will be installed that will provide a connection between the sidewalks of the
southern residential cul-de-sac and the northwest corner of Tangerine Road and La Cholla
Boulevard. The trail connection will extend north from the cul-de-sac to the existing Episcopal
Church of the Apostles and continue to the pedestrian access point adjacent to the main
entrance off La Cholla Boulevard. An in -lieu fee will be paid for any pedestrian sidewalks
that are required, but not built as part of this project, along Como Drive, Limewood Drive, or
La Cholla Boulevard.
B. Ownership of Natural and Modified Open Space
Natural and modified open space within the development will be owned and maintained by
the homeowners' association (HOA).
12. Schools
A. Number of Students Generated by Rezoning
The number of students generated by the rezoning was obtained from Amphitheater School
District (ASD). In their school capacity letter (See Exhibit:11.12.C: School Capacity Letter),
ASD projects the number of students based on 2000 demographic multipliers developed by
the U.S. Department of Census, Bureau of Census, and adjusts them to Amphitheater school
organizational patterns.
The proposed 54-unit single family development is expected to generate a total of 30
students across all three academic levels.
Table 11.12.A: Students Generated by Rezoning
Academic Level
54 Single Family Homes
Elementary
11
Middle
12
High School
7
0
oV Part 11 — Land Use Proposal II-96
Cresta Morado Rezoning
B. Remaining Capacity in Schools
The developments location within the Amphitheater School district indicates students living
in the development would attend Wilson K-5 for elementary school, Wilson 6-8 for middle
school, and Ironwood Ridge High. Currently, there is capacity for students generated by
this development at all three schools. The capacity and availability is listed in the following
table.
Table 11.12.13: School Capacity and Availability
School Name
School Capacity
Spaces Currently Available
Wilson K-5 (Elementary)
750
196
Wilson 6-8 (Middle)
800
134
Ironwood Ridge High
2290
499
C. School Capacity Letter
A school capacity letter from the legal department of Amphitheater School District is inserted
into this document on the next page. It discusses the schools that will absorb the student
population, the method in which numbers are generated, and capacity and availability in the
schools.
R.0 Part 11 — Land Use Proposal II-97
Cresta Morado Rezoning
AMPHITHEATER
P u b J i c S c b o o l r
Exhibit 11.12.C: School Capacity Letter
LEGAL DEPARTWNT
Michelle H. Tong, I D.
Associate to the Superintendent
General Counsel
(520) 696-5150 • FAX (520) 696-5074
701 1V. Wetmore Road ■ Tucsnn, A% 95705 s (520) 696-50(R)
GoNrammi BoARr) Mrtitttr'.tis Demma M. Day, Iv1.Ed. Vicki Cox Colder
President Vicc President
SUPERMTENDE W
Todd A. Jacgcr, J.U.
November 2, 2017
I .exy Wellott
The Planning Center
110 S Church, Ste 6320
Tucson AZ 85701
wkvw-.atnplii.com
Scott K. Baker, Ph.D. Scott A.1,cska Susan 711hrat
RC: Rezoning for 25.6 acres.
Northwest Corner of Tangerine and La Cholla
Parcel #219-42-016B
Project: ANG-01
Dear Ms. Wellott:
I am responding to your request for infolTnation regarding the capacity of Amphitheater schools
impacted by your proposed development.
Using 2000 demographic multipliers developed by the U.S. Department of Census, Bureau of
Census, and adjusted for Amphitheater District's school organizational patterns, we proicct the
following student populations to result from this project when built:
Academic Level 55 Single Family Homes
Elementary I 1
Middle 12
High School 7
The census multipliers we use to obtain these projections are 0.2075 elementary students per
household, 0.2197 middle school students per household and 0.1282 high school students per
household.
The capacity noted below is based on today's school enrollment The schools which would be
impacted by your project's proposed enrollment are listed below, along with the physical capacity
available at each school presently, Please note that these schools will also be impacted by other
developments in this arcs which may have already been approved by the Council but which are not yet
built.
Amphitheater High Schad • Canyon dd (Ao fligh School • Ironwood Ridge High School
Amphitheater mime School • Cumilado K-8 Scilonl • Cmss Middle School • l.a Cana Middle School • Wilson K-8 school
Copper Cmck Elementary • Donaldson Flementary • Harelson Elc muttuy - J lolareay Elementary • Innovation Academy - Keeling Plen:cntary
Mesa Verde Flementary • NnAiElcmculnry • Painted Sky Elementary • Prinm Elemetaaty • Itio Vista Elementary • Wndker Elementary • Rill ito Ckntcr
Part 11 — Land Use Proposal II-98
Cresta Morado Rezoning
Page 2
Spaces Currently
School Name School Capacity Available
Wilson K-5 (Elementary) 750 196
Wilson 6-8 (Middle) 800 134
Ironwood Ridge High 2290 499
If I can provide any additional information, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Connie R. McFarland
Legal Assistant
V�" Part 11 — Land Use Proposal II-99
Cresta Morado Rezoning
13. Water
A. Demand Generated from Rezoning
Cresta Morado will generate domestic water demand for up to 54 detached single-family
homes in addition to the existing church. The subdivision will feature low water -use, drought
tolerant landscaping, irrigated to maximize efficient water use onsite.
B. Assured Water Supply Letter
An assured water supply letter from the Town of Oro Valley Water Utility is inserted into this
document on the next page. It discusses the utility's ability to provide water to the property,
conditions under which capacity will be provided and the process and submittal requirements
for water service.
GOD
COO Part 11 —Land Use Proposal II-100
Cresta Morado Rezoning
Exhibit 11.13.13: Assured Water Supply Letter
O�NOEO Mgt
Oro Valley Water Utility
November 6, 2017
Lexy Wellot
The Planning Center
110 S. Church Ste.6320
Tucson, AZ 85701
Subject: Parcel219-42-016B
To Whom it may concern:
The Town of Oro Valley Water Utility currently has water service available to the
above property under the following conditions:
A Water Plan is submitted by the applicant and approved by the Water
Utility
A Line Extension Agreement is executed by the applicant.
All construction is in accordance with the approved Water Plan and the new
facilities are accepted by the Water Utility in accordance with the
requirements of the Line Extension Agreement.
Payment of all water development impact fees, meter fees and other
required fees and charges. (A water meter for residential and/or
commercial use cannot be sold until after the issuance of an approved
building permit.)
All conditions of Ordinance NO. (0) 07-38 as they pertain to Public Water
infrastructure will be followed.
WATER SUPPLY
The Town of Oro Valley Water Utility has been designated by the State of Arizona,
Department of Water Resources, as having an Assured Water Supply (AWS No.
2003-001 Decision and Order No. 26-400765). This development lies within the
boundary of the Oro Valley Water Utility's planned water service area. Once the
property is platted, it will be noted on the plat(s) for these properties that the
property meets the State requirement of an Assured Water Supply because it wilt
be served by Oro Valley Water Utility.
u ww.orovalleyaz.gov
11000 N. La Ca6ada Drive • Oro Valley, Arizona 85737
Phone: (520) 229-5000 • fax: (520) 229-5029
Go
00 Part II — Land Use Proposal II-101
Cresta Morado Rezoning
61_11E771
Ore Valley Water Utility
WATER SERVICE
The developer shall be required to submit a Water Plan identifying water system
improvements. These include but are not limited to:
Water Use
Fire Flow Requirements
Offsite/ Onsite Water Facilities
r Loops and Proposed Connection Points to Existing Water System
Easements/Common Areas
Once a Water Plan is submitted, it will be determined if the proposed plan can
meet the water requirements of the proposed development. The developer shall
be fiscally and financially responsible for all water system improvements and
modifyinglenhancing the existing water system to meet those needs. It is
recommended that the applicant contact the Water Utility to discuss the
construction of water system improvements prior to submitting a Water Plan for
the property.
This letter and the comments herein regarding water availability are valid for a
period of one year only through November 6, 2018. Issuance of this letter is not to
be construed as approval of a Water Plan and/or acceptance of any construction
for water service.
If you have any questions or would like more details regarding any construction
improvements that may be required in a Water Plan, please call me at 229-5017.
Sincerely,
_`-M,
Mark Moore
New Development Coordinator
cc: Peter Abraham, P.E. Water Utility Director
www.orovaileyaz.gov
11000 N. La Canada Drive • Oro Vallee, Arizona 85737
Phone: (520) 229-5000 • fax: (520) 229-5029
Part 11 —Land Use Proposal II-102
Cresta Morado Rezoning
14. Sewer
A. Sewer Service
Three options for providing sewer service to the project were researched and the following is
a summary of each.
The first option is to tie into the existing sewer (Plan No. G-2011-011, manhole No. 3123-
06) southwest of the site. Gravity outfall to this location appears feasible. Public sewer
construction is permitted within the private street (Mesquite Sunset Place) as shown on the
final plat for Sunset Canyon Estates (Book 61, Page 72 of Pima County Maps and Plats).
This private street is identified on the final plat as Common Area A, and the dedication
language on the final plat indicates that this common area is granted as an easement to all
utility companies for the construction of underground utilities and public sewers. Construction
of this option, however, will likely require jack and boring under Tangerine Road, removal
and replacement of decorative paving at the subdivision entrance as well as require
substantial interaction and permission from the Sunset Canyon Estates Homeowner's
Association.
The second potential sewer outfall location is to tie into the existing stub out on the north side
of Tangerine Road (Plan No. G-98-146, manhole No. 4635-16) to the southeast of the site.
Providing a gravity sewer outfall to provide for gravity sewer service to all of the Cresta
Morado site, however, is not feasible due to grade constraints.
The third option is to construct a gravity sewer outfall from the project south through the
parcel owned by the Arizona State Land Department and connect to the existing manhole
(Plan No. G-2013-041, manhole No. 2927-12) within the Rancho de Plata subdivision.
Public sewer construction is permitted within the private street (Tangor Place) as shown on
the final plat for Rancho de Plata (Sequence No. 20142580496). This private street is
identified on the final plat as Common Area C, and the dedication language on the final plat
indicates that this common area is granted to Pima County as a public sewer easement for
the access, installation, maintenance, construction and replacement of public sewers.
Construction of this potential sewer line would require the granting of a sewer easement from
the Arizona State Land Department.
In summary, the most attractive and preferred option is the first option to tie into the sewer at
Mesquite Sunset Place within Sunset Canyon Estates.
B. RWRD Capacity & Service Letter
See Exhibit 11.14.8: RWRD Capacity & Service Letter.
0 06 Part 11 — Land Use Proposal II-103
Cresta Morado Rezoning
Exhibit 11.14.B: RWRD Capacity & Service Letter
A
PIMA COUNTY
WASTEWATER RECLAMATION
JACKSON JENKINS 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE
TUCSON,ARIZONA 85701-1207
Lexy Wellot
The Planning Center
2 E Congress #600
Tucson, AZ 85701
December 8, 2017
Sewerage Capacity Investigation No. 2017-245 Type I
RE: Episcopal Church of Apostles Rezone, Parcel 21942016B
Estimated Flow 11,880 gpd (ADWF).
P17WC00245,
Greetings:
PH: (520) 724-6500
FAX: (520) 724-9635
The above referenced project is tributary to the Tres Rios Water Reclamation Facility via the Cahada del Oro
Interceptor.
Capacity is currently available for a project this size in the public sewer G-2011-011, downstream from manhole
3123-06.
This letter is not a reservation or commitment of treatment or conveyance capacity for this project. It is not an
approval of point and method of connection. It is an analysis of the system as of this date.
If further information is needed, please feel free to contact us at (520) 724-6607
Reviewed by: Kurt Stemm, CEA Sr.
Part 11 —Land Use Proposal II-104
Cresta Morado Rezoning
15. Buffer Yards
A. Techniques for Mitigating Sound, Visibility, Exterior Lighting and Traffic
Buffer yards will be constructed, at a minimum, to Town of Oro Valley standards and
requirements. In most cases, provided buffer yards will exceed Town minimums in width.
Environmentally Sensitive Open Space (ESOS) will be utilized to provide additional buffering
from neighbors along Como Drive, La Cholla Boulevard and Tangerine Road. These
extensive areas of land vary in width but are typically in excess of 50' and in some locations,
exceed 100' (See Exhibit II.1.A: Tentative Development Plan).
Buffer yards in excess of Town standards and ESOS areas, will be used to mitigate sound,
visibility and ill effects of lighting from homes and traffic. In locations where ESOS is not
adjacent to buffer yards, decorative masonry walls will be used for additional screening and
mitigation. Walls will be located on lot property lines in order to preserve as much existing
vegetation as possible as well as helping them blend into their surroundings. Bufferyard
plants will be in conformance with the Town of Oro Valley's Approved Native Plant List.
B. Buffer yard Cross Sections
Buffer yard widths vary across the proposed development depending on location, street
frontages, and or adjacent uses. In most cases, widths exceed town standards. Screening
devices will be placed on residential lot lines rather than the project boundary to provide
additional landscaping between street right-of-way and proposed development. Screening
devices will be a minimum of 5 feet in height and will be placed on proposed side and rear
yard property lines. Buffer yard plantings will consist of plants native to the Sonoran Desert
and may include species such as Ironwood, Mesquite, Ash, Agave, Ocotillo, and Saguaro.
The buffer yards will be composed through the use of an upper level or tree level, a middle
shrub level and a groundcover level. The upper level will be comprised of species that grow
between fifteen and thirty feet tall when fully grown. The shrub level will be comprised of
species that grow between three feet and fifteen feet when fully grown and the groundcover
plane will be less than three feet tall. Currently it is not anticipated that earthen berms will be
constructed for screening, but rain water harvesting basins varying in depth from six to
eighteen inches will be incorporated as often as possible. All buffer yard widths will meet
Town of Oro Valley standards.
017
Part 11 —Land Use Proposal II-105
Cresta Morado Rezoning
Exhibit 11.15.B: Buffer yard Sections
BUFFER YARD SECTIONS
RESIDENTIAL
OPEN SPACE
VARIABLE
BUFFER YARD -
LIMEVVOCD OR
STREET
RESIDENTIAL LOT
(PUBLIC ROW)BUFFER
YARD
I o ESOS
SCREEN: 5-FOOT MASONRY WALL
ESOSpYr
,
EXISTINGiil
VEGETATION i
r
RESIDENTIAL
OPEN SPACE
II
BUFFER YARD
RESIDENCE
C
r.
BUFFER YARD: LIMEWOOD DRIVE
o
5
SECTION
r=zo' o'
0
O
U
U
IL
ESOS g
i TANGERINE RD
15'
LANDSCAPED
(PUBLIC ROW)
ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE OPEN SPACE (ESOS)
AREA RESIDENTIAL LOT
SCREEN:
S•FOOT MASONRY WALL
EXISTING VEGETATION
EXISTING VEGETATION
.tom,
RESIDENCE
BUFFER YARD: LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD
2
SECTION
r=zo'•o'
CRESTA MORADO
n
r.�-^
warn uucm out mnotu
....
Part 11 — Land Use Proposal II-106
STREET
(PUBLIC ROW)
ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE
OPEN SPACE (ESOS)
APPROXIMATELY 174
EXISTING VEGETATION
Cresta Morado Rezoning
Exhibit 11.15.B: Buffer yard Sections cont.
BUFFER YARD SECTIONS
-}� RESIDENTIAL LOT
- 15' LANDSCAPED AREA
SCREEN. 5-FOOT MASONRY WALL
I
RESIDENCE
3 BUFFER YARD: COMO DRIVE
SECTION 1"=2n.a•
STREET
(PUBLIC RC"
EXISTING VEGETATION
50,
BUFFER
YARD
PER
RESIDENTIAL LOT
TRCOD
(AND ESOS)
SCREEN: 5-FOOT MASONRY WALL
RESIDENCE
4 BUFFER YARD: TANGERINE ROAD
SECTION
CRESTA MORADO
68
8Bp,, PiA
KtVkai.Wf/i�OAR �)flNetC '�����
ftf W.�f AY:-0� U9M 4CIif.NIM�:
Part 11 — Land Use Proposal II-107
SITE RESOURCE INVENTORY
CRESTA MORADO
LIMEWOOD DR
o ° �
�oV
1
1
D
�800
0
as '
207 'T
208 206
x
000000
C O �
EXISTING EPISCOPAL 205 X.
3 e CHURCH OF THE APOSTLES'`'
�a �oCHURCH (TO REMAIN) % j\
204 ;
203
-}. -
202 _ ' ,x`
201 r
dC
�C
o
,O o
TRCOD 50' SETBACK
�o
� v u
4 a �
TANGER
THE PLAN NINGCENTER
2 e congress ste 600 tucson az 85701 520.623.6146 520.622.1950 azplanningcenter.com
0
,o
EXISTING ACCESS TO LA CHOLLA
BOULEVARD (TO REMAIN)
�s
PIMA COUNTY IDENTIFIED
RIPARIAN AREA
n
/ a
NORTH
0' 40' 80' 160'
SCALE: 1 "= 80
THIS PROJECT
GENERAL NOTES
1. Zoning: the existing zoning is R1-144, the proposed zoning is R1-7.
2. Tax Code Parcels: 219-42-016B
3. Area: the project area is approximately 22.22 acres.
4. Land Use: vacant
SRI Notes
1. This site is located within the Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District
(TRCOD).
2. The entire site is designated as Resource Management Area Tier 2
2.1. This requires 25% open space
3. There are no Distinct Native Plant Stands on -site
4. This aerial photo is less than two years old.
5. This site has no unique rock outcroppings.
6. No portion of the site has slopes greater than 15%.
7. The majority of the site is undisturbed.
8. There are mapped washes on the site.
9. The site features saguaros (Carnegia gigantea), mesquite trees (Prosopis
velutina), foothills palo verde trees (Parkinsonia microphylla), creosote
(Larrea tridentate), barrel cactus (Ferocactus wislizeni), and various
cholla species (Cylindropuntia); however, the only significant vegetation
on site include specimen saguaros and 1 nurse tree. The significant
species are identified on the map.
SE4 SE4 EXC RDS 29.9 AC
TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, SECTION 33
G&SRB&M TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA
NORTH
LOCATION MAP
SCALE: 3" = 1 MILE
SHEET INDEX:
SITE RESOURCE INVENTORY THIS SHEET
SUBMITTAL HISTORY:
1ST 4/02/18
2nd 8/14/18
ID NUMBER
SPECIES
HEIGHT
CALIPER
TRUNK
VIABILITY
TRANSPLANT
DISPOSITION
ARMS
NOTES
200
CARNEGIEA GIGANTEA
16
0
SINGLE
HIGH
LOW
TOS
5
201
CARNEGIEA GIGANTEA
20
0
SINGLE
LOW
LOW
NV
5
202
CARNEGIEA GIGANTEA
19
0
SINGLE
LOW
LOW
NV
15
\ery poor health
203
CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM
19
15
MULTI
MEDIUM
LOW
TOS
nurse tree 3 saguaro
204
CARNEGIEA GIGANTEA
19
0
SINGLE
MEDIUM
LOW
RFS
4
205
CARNEGIEA GIGANTEA
19
0
SINGLE
LOW
LOW
PIP
4
206
CARNEGIEA GIGANTEA
15
0
SINGLE
HIGH
MEDIUM
TOS
3
207
CARNEGIEA GIGANTEA
19
0
SINGLE
HIGH
MEDIUM
TOS
0
208 JCARNEGIEA
GIGANTEA
20
0
SINGLE
HIGH
MEDIUM
RFS
4
209 ICARNEGIEA
GIGANTEA
15
0
SINGLE
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
TOS
3
LEGEND
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
■ ! PROPERTY BOUNDARY
TRCOD SETBACK
LOT LINES
IDENTIFIED SPECIMEN & ID
208
1 FOOT CONTOUR INTERVAL
L _ _ PIMA COUNTY IDENTIFIED RIPARIAN AREA
PROJECT: ANG-01
DATE: 8/14/18_
--
DRAWN BY: CJL_
CHECKED BY: FW-
CALL TWO WORKING
DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG
602-263-1100
1-82-STAKE0
(OUTSIDE
(O
MARICOUT COUNTY)
#
1
REVISIONS/SUBMITTALS
DATE
4/6/18
--
CONSULTANT; APPLICANT: OWNER;
The Planning Center The Planning Center Episcopal Church of the
C.O. Brian Underwood C.O, Brian Underwood Apostles
2 E Congress # 600 2 E Congress # 600 C.O. Debra Asis
Tucson, AZ 85701 Tucson, AZ 85701 P.O. Box 68435
Tucson, AZ 85737
FOR AGENCY REVIEW AND APPROVAL ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION. NOT FOR BIDDING
REVISED PER COMMENTS
w
�t
�I
SITE RESOURCE INVENTORY CASE NO.
CRESTA MORADO OV1702583
REFERENCE:
SRI
SE4 SE4 EXC RDS 29,9 AC 1 of 1