Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOV121008Please fill out the, Our Pride is Growing! g postcard below for more Certification Means Business information on becoming _ OUR PRIDE - all ACLP is raising the standardof our Arizona Certified Industry. IS Steve Mall , en ACLP Landscape Professional Horizons west GROWING! As correct techniques are incorporated into A. r i z o n a Andustry practices, outstanding, capes ------------------- become a source of pdin every Southwest community. Elizabeth Davison University of Arizona Certified b o I E*rry of q Landscape �s`�JN y2Oti. Professionals AGRICULTURE S�. Cooperative Extension The University of Arizona® LN.+ CA College of Agriculture and Life Sciences .•^ - I Cooperative Extension This program is co -sponsored by The Universitv of Arizona Cooperative Extension, and the Arizona c Arizona Certified Landscape Landscape Contractors' Association. o!ra+hy Professionals Program alp I - . At ARUONA LANDSCAPE - - CONTRACTORS.. - - - ASSOCIATION - - The Arizona_ Certified What Will I Learn? Certification Means Business... Landscape Professional Program. For more information : on becoming an Each, optional workshop session is designed Arizona Certified, Landscape Professional call What is the _Arizona Certified, for interaction and hands-on learning: By the end of the 12-month program, participants, have P g P p 602 258-0126 or toll free 877 616-2486, ( ) ( ) Landscape' Professional program? . Fax (602) 258-0779, email'judy@azlca.com or . accumulated a valuable resource of information mail this postcard today! .— of basic landscape . e skills A i This program is for those aspiring to Studies include: r -z o n a be professional landscapers. ,Each.year,the • 'Equipment Operation & Maintenance ACLP ' program sponsors a series of Safety optional educational programs and . Plant Identification certification. ,exams: The ,exam ` is '. • Safe Practices in Landscaping pg comprised' of tests, - both written and • Chemical Applicator Regulations Certified Landscape practical, P g • -Reading Landscape Plans - • : Weed Identification_& Control Professionals • Sod Laying & Turf ID Planting & Staking • Irrigation Installation and Troubi • shooting ------------- --- --- --- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - • , Water Management •'_ -Soil & Water Management [ ]' Yes, I would like to participate in'the • Pruning • _ Revegetation Management . Arizona Certified Landscape Professional program. " Safe Tools Safety . • Plant Disease ID & Diagnosis g Please put me on your mailing list. Irrigation • , Pest Problems & Management • " Plant Identification • Xeriscape Principles & Practices • Plant Problem Diagnosis • Planting & Pruning Techniques .. Name • Pesticides & Calibrations • Turf Management, • Soils and Fertility • Plant Nutrition Annuals & Perennials' Home Street Address Annuals and Perennials . The intent of the exam is to identify Why Become.Certified? City State - zip and certify those - individuals who have basic landscape skills. The, certification process increases ; knowledge and skills earns greater respect and Home Phone How. does ACLP work? enhances the public image of the industry. Just ( ) . Work.Phone A . Candidate- will be -declared .an ' . as importantly; certification :paves the wa for y Arizona Certified Landscape Professional P career advancement and added income: (ACLP) when he/she receives at least a Successful ACLP candidates become Arizona . Company minimum score of 70% on each section of Certified Landscape Professionals and proudly the examination. Retakes' are permissible. display the ACLP designation following their Your Email address Graduates will earn the right to use the' names. as a symbol of integrity and competence. Fill in the above information, then detach and mail this ACLP designation after their name and to . Let the Arizona 'Certified Landscape ; postcard today. You will be sent a complete ACLP proudly display : the ACLP certificate for Professional program provide the nourishment Workshop / Certification Exam Schedule right away. customers and business associates to see. you need to thrive in this growing profession. " JP�I.EY Aq�l 0 OZy v #_ E x � € UNDED 19IA:, 11/15/10 RE: OV12-10-08 and OV13-10-04, the Town Office of Conservation & Sustainability requests approval of architecture and landscaping associated with new covered parking that supports solar photovoltaic panels at the Town Hall Complex, located at the southeast corner of the La Canada Drive and Naranja Drive intersection. To Whom It May Concern: At their regular meeting of 5/11/10, the Development Review Board unanimously approved both OV12-10-08 and OV13-10-04. There were no conditions specified. Both items were also reviewed and approved by Town Council on 5/19/2010. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Bayer Vella, Conservation & Sustainability Administrator. Sincer ly, 'i C 'Bayer Vella, AICP Conservation & Sustainability Administrator 229-4810 Clear Day Page 1 of 1 Gay, Shirley From: Vella, Bayer Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 6:20 PM To: Gay, Shirley Subject: RE: OV1210-08 & OV1310-04 Nah.... thanks for asking Bayer Vella, AICP Conservation and Sustainability Manager Town of Oro Valley ph: 520-229-4810 kA Please consider the ern-tronment before printing this message. From: Gay, Shirley Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 3:57 PM To: Vella, Bayer Subject: OV1210-08 & OV1310-04 Bayer do these need to be noticed? Shirley Gay Development Coordinator 520-229-4849 sg.ay_@oroval leyaz..go_v._ Please note new email address 04/30/2010 Town Council Page 1 of 11 MINUTES ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION May 19, 2010 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER - 6.02 P.M. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Paul Loomis, Mayor Bill Garner, Vice Mayor K.C. Carter, Councilmember Barry Gillaspie, Councilmember Mary Snider, Councilmember Pat Spoerl, Councilmember Vice Mayor Garner attended the Council meeting via telephone. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Loomis led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS Communications Administrator Mary Davis reviewed the upcoming meetings and events. COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Snider reported that she, Mayor Loomis and Communications Administrator Mary Davis met with Kathy DeGraff, a representative from Up with People. She stated that they discussed Up with People's 45th anniversary reunion and the possibility of the Town hosting the event. This event would involve and benefit the youth of Oro Valley. Councilmember Snider also reported that the Oro Valley Optimist Club, the Oro Valley Police Department, the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), the Pima County Wastewater Department and the University of Arizona School of Pharmacy held another monthly Dispose-a-Med event at which 88 pounds of medications were collected. She thanked the Police Department and the Optimist Club members for their involvement in the event. http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=922 11/09/2010 Town Council Page 2 of 11 DEPARTMENT REPORTS - None presented ORDER OF BUSINESS: MAYOR WILL REVIEW THE ORDER OF THE MEETING There being no objections, Mayor Loomis moved Item 5 up on the agenda to follow the Consent Agenda. CALL TO AUDIENCE - No speakers. PRESENTATIONS a. Presentation of Distinguished Budget Presentation Award from the Government Finance Officers Association for the FY 2009/10 Town of Oro Valley Budget Click here for Presentation a Mayor Loomis explained that this is the second year that the Distinguished Budget Presentation Award has been awarded to the Town by the Government Finance Officers Association. He then presented Finance Director Stacey Lemos and Budget and Management Analyst Wendy Gomez with the award. b. Presentation by the Office of Conservation & Sustainability regarding landscaping and architecture associated with new covered parking to support solar photovoltaic panels at the Town Hall Complex Click here for Presentation b Conservation and Sustainability Manager Bayer Vella reviewed the Town Hall parking lot design in which polycrystalline solar panels would be placed on top of covered parking structures. He explained that these panels would provide enough solar power to offset 60% of the annual power consumed within the Administration Building, Water Utility, Court, Police Station and Development Services. Mr. Vella stated that the project completion date was December 2010. Mr. Vella also highlighted the Landscape Plan: Strategic shade management to maximize energy production Landscape island placement - Retrofit current parking islands and gain 11 parking spaces Mitigation Area: Main Town Hall entrance, Library and Police Department - Revegetation to comply with low water use code Landscape Conservation Code provisions - Native plants and shade tolerant species - Design for zero potable water use - Mitigation beyond zoning requirements - Approved by the Development Review Board http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=922 11 /09/2010 Town Council Page 3 of 11 C. Presentation of the Award for Excellence from the Arizona Municipal Risk Retention Pool Click here for Presentation c Mayor Loomis presented the Award of Excellence from the Arizona Municipal Risk Retention Pool to Bob Easton, Safety & Risk Manager, for his work with the Town's Loss Control Committee who have worked to create a safe environment throughout the Town Hall campus. CONSENT AGENDA MOTION: A motion was made by Councilmember Gillaspie and seconded by Councilmember Carter to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. MOTION carried, 6-0. A. Minutes: April 7, 2010 Click here for the April 7, 2010 Minutes B. Cultural Resources Inventory Final Report - Acceptance of "Rock Art, Ranch, and Residence: Cultural Resources in the Town of Oro Valley and Its Planning Area", Final Report Click here for Item B C. Economic Development Division Quarterly Report: January 1, 2010 - March 31, 2010 Click here for Item C D. Fiscal Year 2009/10 Financial Update through March 2010 Click here for Item D E. Police Department Report - March 2010 Statistics Click here for Item E F. Public Safety Fire and Emergency Medical Service Providers Quarterly Report to Council Click here for Item F G. Resolution No. (R)10 - 26 Authorizing and approving a master Intergovernmental Agreement between the Town of Oro Valley and the State of Arizona regarding construction, maintenance and enhancement http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=922 11 /09/2010 Town Council Page 4 of I 1 projects for certain Arizona State Highways Click here for Item G H. Resolution No. (R)10-27 Authorizing the execution and delivery of a purchase agreement, a trust agreement, an obligation purchase agreement and a continuing disclosure certificate; approving an official statement; approving the sale, execution and delivery of excise tax revenue obligations (new clean renewable energy bonds - direct payment), series 2010, evidencing a proportionate interest of the owners thereof in a purchase agreement between the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, and a trustee and the sale thereof to the purchaser thereof; and authorizing the taking of all other actions necessary to the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this resolution Click here for Item H Approval of the proposed new Town Monument Signs on Oracle Road Click here for Item I 5. PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION NO. (R)10-29 ADOPTION OF THE TENTATIVE BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010/2011 AND SETTING THE LOCAL ALTERNATIVE EXPENDITURE LIMITATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010/2011 Click here for Item 5 Click here for additional material Interim Assistant Town Manager and Finance Director Stacey Lemos presented the Tentative Budget in the amount of $116,208.785. She then reviewed additional items that were added since the Town Manager's Recommended Budget was introduced and explained that these items are now included in the Tentative Budget: — Solar Photovoltaic (CREBS) bond proceeds and capital outlay - $2,500,000 — CNA Task Force grant revenues - $97,241 — PAG reimbursable pavement preservation - $47,000 — Federal subsidy for CREBS FY 2010/11 debt service payment - $15,605 Ms. Lemos listed the following as items brought forward from the May 12, 2010 Special Session for further consideration: — Health insurance and other benefits - Plan renewal - Funding of premium increases - Employee contribution retirement increases COLA/bonus payment for employees — Economic development items http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=922 11 /09/2010 Town Council Page 5 of 11 - Metropolitan Tucson Convention & Visitors Bureau (MTCVB) - Tucson Regional Economic Opportunities, Inc. (TREO) - IronKids Triathlon Human Resources Director Betty Dickens reviewed the proposed health and ancillary benefits and highlighted the following: — Renegotiated the total premium increase with United Healthcare down to the rate of 7.1 % — Staff recommends continuing with United Healthcare TOWN COSTS (Per month) Coverage Current Type Cost Renewal Cost EMPLOYEE COSTS (Per Monthly Current Difference Cost month) Renewal Monthly Cost Difference Employee 1$21.19 1$0.00 Employee + Spouse $609.48 $40.26 $89.88 $96.23 $6.35 I$569.22 Employee + Child(ren) $456.87 $489.19 $32.32 $52.43 $56.14 $3.71 Employee + Family $g00.65 $857.28 F$56.63 $167.02 $178.83 $11.81 Ms. Dickens also stated that staff recommended the following providers for ancillary benefits: Dental Insurance - Principal — Life and Disability - Principal — Supplemental Life - Principal — Vision Care - EyeMed Ms. Lemos then reviewed the funding of health insurance premium and contribution retirement increases: — Impact to cover employee portion of 7.1 % health insurance increase - $19,350 Impact to cover impact of .45% increase to Arizona State Retirement System (ASRS) - $51,306 Impact to provide COLA/bonus payment to employees - .5% COLA - $107,365 - 1 % COLA - $214,731 - 1 % Bonus - $196,730 - 1.5% Bonus - $295,095 Ms. Lemos also reviewed economic development items and possible funding amounts (could be funded through use of Bed Tax Fund contingency or reduction in transfer of bed tax revenues to General Fund): — MTCVB - $71,800 (1/2 of 1% bed tax revenues) — TREO - $43,521 IronKids Triathlon - $8,000 http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=922 11/09/2010 Town Council Page 6 of 11 Ms. Lemos reported that General Fund Budget capacity savings in the amount of $82,500 would be realized over the amounts reflected in the Town Manager's Recommended Budget as follows: Pima County Animal Control (PCAC) Services - $8000 savings due to PCAC revenue surplus for Oro Valley — Police and Parks and Recreation Management Studies - $35,000 due to negotiated amounts less than budgeted Cost Allocation Study - $15,000 (due to more realistic budget amount) — CNA Task Force Grant position - $24,000 savings (due to promotion and hiring at a lower Step) Discussion followed regarding: — $250,000 from WalMart for recreation improvements at Naranja Town Site - Information previously requested regarding a water line extension (staff is working on additional costs) - $258,000 included in budget and is eligible for expenditure - will come back to Study Session - Included as existing contingency funds in Naranja Town Site fund — Analysis of other in -lieu costs (i.e. El Tour) — Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Police Officers (before Council on June 2, 2010) Personnel Policy amendment will add two additional holidays (Christmas Eve and New Years Eve) — Coyote Run Transit Services - presentation to Council on June 2, 2010 (have budgeted $300,000 for transit services) — Town's share of retirement contributions, employee payments Benefits quotes are guaranteed rates for 2-3 years Estimated increase for health and retirement benefits would be $205,624 ($135,000 is factored into the recommended budget with $49,122 coming from the General Fund) Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. John Musolf, Oro Valley resident, stated that a balanced budget means matching expenditures to revenues. He stated that there were expenditures in the recommended budget that he did not know what they were (Miscellaneous Other Operating Expenditures). He also questioned how important the line items for Council memberships/subscriptions and travel and training and $6,000 for a Holiday Party and $4,000-$6,000 for Special Events were. He stated that what was being recommended was not a "bare bones" budget. He expressed concerns regarding the consideration of funding economic development agencies and stated that this process should be a competitive bidding process. Bill Adler, Oro Valley resident, stated that he believed that balancing the budget was a community responsibility. He stated that the recommended budget accepted levels of revenue and adjusted services accordingly which would compromise the quality of the levels of services. He also stated that the issue of http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=922 11 /09/2010 Town Council Page 7 of 11 economic development and the sponsoring of events such as the IronKids Triathlon, were recurring items and should not come out of contingency funds. Mr. Adler commented that raising taxes to raise revenues was not a crime and it was time to talk about revenue sources. Richard Tracy, Oro Valley resident, expressed concerns about the budget and questioned how the recommended budget went from approximately $113 million to $116 million and where the extra revenues would be coming from. He also spoke to the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) and questioned if there were items in the MOU that might further impact the budget. Mr. Tracey stated that he was opposed to the budget being tentatively passed tonight as he felt that the new Council should have the opportunity to have input into the budget. Mayor Loomis closed the public hearing. At the request of Vice Mayor Garner; Ms. Lemos explained that the $2.5 million adjustment to the tentative budget was for the CREBs Bonds for solar photovoltaic panels and the Town's overall efficiency strategy which was approved by Council. She explained that these bonds would be paid for with energy savings and Tucson Electric Power rebates. She explained that this was a new source of revenue since the budget was first submitted. Ms. Lemos stated that the Town was required to present a balanced budget with revenue sources equaling expenditures. Further discussion followed regarding the MOU negotiations, opportunities for additional revenue (primary property taxes, increase in sales tax), and that memberships in various organizations such as the Conference of Mayors, the League of Arizona Cities and Towns, the National League of Cities and Towns and Pima Association of Governments (PAG) are included in the budget for the Town Council. MOTION: A motion was made by Councilmember Snider and seconded by Councilmember Carter to approve Items 1) stand alone option employee health benefit recommendation, 3) the EyeMed for vision care option recommendation, 4) the Principal dual buy -up dental option recommendation and 5) the Principal Group Life/AD&D, Group Short Term Disability, Group Long Term Disability and Supplemental Life option recommendation. In response to a question from Vice Mayor Garner, Ms. Dickens explained that even though the rates are guaranteed for a certain period of years, the Town would not be prohibited from going out for new competitive bids in the future if necessary. MOTION: A motion was made by Councilmember Gillaspie and seconded by Vice Mayor Garner to amend the motion to include Item 2) Town funding of employee dependent coverage deductions including the amount of approximately $19,000. http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=922 11 /09/2010 Town Council Page 8 of 11 Councilmember Gillaspie stated that by leaving in Item 2, future Councils would have the entire package that they could debate. He also stated that he supported the $200,000 in total costs for health insurance including the Arizona State Retirement System (ASRS) and Correction Officers Retirement Plan (CORP) and other benefits which would keep the Town employees "whole" in the upcoming year as the Town could not afford to give the employees a Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA). Mayor Loomis commented that Item 2 was a recurring expense and it was not applicable across the board. He felt that it was specific to staff that were purchasing family options and it was a question of fairness. MOTION carried, 5-1 with Mayor Loomis opposed. MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED, 6-0. MOTION: A motion was made by Councilmember Gillaspie and seconded by Councilmember Spoerl to adopt Resolution (R)10-29 adopting the Tentative Budget for Fiscal Year 2010/2011 and setting the Local Alternative Expenditure Limitation for Fiscal Year 2010/2011 in the amount of $116,208,785. Discussion followed regarding: — Budget process began in January in an effort to change the way the budget process was done. — All candidates received copies of the budget and approval of the Tentative Budget would not preclude any future action during the final budget adoption. — Confirm work of directors and staff. They have met the challenges and reduced services back to 2004 levels. Money is available. — The new Council can do what they want with the items as presented in the Tentative Budget. A balanced budget has been presented. — There will be a majority shift of membership on Council and it is important to listen to voters that elected the new members. — Previous Town Councils have not adopted a tentative budget before June 3rd. — Approval of the Tentative Budget establishes a cap and decisions can still be made by the new Council. — Give the ownership of the budget to the new Council and allow them the opportunity to bring in their ideas. MOTION failed, 3-3 with Mayor Loomis, Councilmember Carter, and Councilmember Snider opposed. Mayor Loomis recessed the meeting at 7:38 p.m. The meeting resumed at 7:47 p.m. 2. PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION NO. (R)10 - 28 GRANTING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) TO DESCO SOUTHWEST FOR A BANK DRIVE -THROUGH, LOCATED WITHIN PHASE 1 OF THE MILLER RANCH http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=922 11 /09/2010 Town Council Page 9 of 11 DEVELOPMENT ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LA CANADA DRIVE AND TANGERINE ROAD OV8-10-002 Click here for Item 2 Acting Planning and Zoning Director Paul Popelka reviewed the Council Communication and explained that a drive -through use was considered a convenience use; therefore, a conditional use permit (CUP) was required. He explained that the applicant has redesigned and reconfigured the site for a bank use with a drive -through and is requesting approval of the CUP. He further reported that Town staff has considered the compatibility of the request, neighbors were notified (no opposition was received) and the request meets Zoning Code requirements; therefore, staff recommended approval. Applicant James Hardin, Desco Southwest, stated that they have been working on this project since 2004 and they are requesting approval of a conditional use permit for a drive -through use for the bank. In response to a question from Vice Mayor Garner, Mr. Popelka explained that the newly adopted public participation ordinance was not in effect when the original rezoning of the property was adopted. However, staff would meet with the neighbors as the project moves into the development and landscape plan stages. Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. There being no speakers, the public hearing was closed. MOTION: A motion was made by Councilmember Gillaspie and seconded by Councilmember Carter to adopt Resolution (R)10-28, OV8-10-002, conditional use permit for a bank drive -through area within Phase 1 of the Miller Ranch Development. MOTION carried, 6-0. 3. DISCUSSION AND/OR POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THE VOLUNTEER SELECTION COMMITTEE PROCESS Click here for Item 3 Communications Administrator Mary Davis reviewed the Council Communication and explained that the Town has hosted an annual volunteer appreciation event since 2007. She explained that staff is recommending that the Selection Committee be changed to include the Communications Administrator, the previous year's winners, a "rotating" Department Director, and a representative from a nonprofit or neighboring jurisdiction (position would also rotate annually). In response to a question from Councilmember Spoerl, Ms. Davis explained that besides a Male Volunteer of the Year and a Female Volunteer of the Year, the Town could also have an Outstanding Community Volunteer of the Year. http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=922 11/09/2010 Town Council Page 10 of 11 MOTION: A motion was made by Councilmember Spoerl and seconded by Councilmember Snider to approve the recommended Volunteer Selection Committee representatives (the Communications Administrator, the previous year's winners, a Department Director, and a representative from a nonprofit or neighboring jurisdiction) effective with the 2010 Volunteer Selection process that includes a Male Volunteer of the Year, a Female Volunteer of the Year and an Outstanding Community Volunteer of the Year. Mayor Loomis recommended that criteria be established for the Outstanding Community Volunteer of the Year. MOTION carried, 5-1 with Councilmember Carter opposed. 4. OV12-09-04 REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR WALKER DENTAL OFFICE ON LOT 10 OF FOOTHILLS BUSINESS PARK, LA JOLLA PLAZA, LOCATED ON NORTH ORACLE ROAD AT HANLEY BOULEARD Click here for Item 4 Acting Planning and Zoning Director Paul Popelka reviewed the Council Communication and explained that the request was for a Development Plan and a Preliminary Plat. He explained that the lot was 1 1/2 acres in size and was being resubdivided to create four individual lots. Mr. Popelka reported that the request was in conformance with General Plan policies, the Zoning Code requirements, Design Guidelines, the La Reserve Planned Area Development (PAD) and Public Works requirements; therefore, staff recommended approval. In response to a question from Mayor Loomis, Peter Solanga, Oracle Engineering Group, representing the applicant, stated that the common parking lot for all four lots would be built in its entirety when the dental office on Lot 1 was constructed. In response to a question from Councilmember Carter, Mr. Solanga also stated that the property sits higher than the 100 year flood plain but the property would also be built up (addressed in the grading permit process). MOTION: A motion was made by Councilmember Gillaspie and seconded by Councilmember Snider to approve OV12-09-04, Development Plan and Preliminary Plat for Lot 10 of the Foothills Business Park, subject to the conditions in Exhibit "A": Exhibit "A" 1. Address all comments as indicated within the redlined development plan/preliminary plat. 2. Provide detectable warnings (e.g. truncated domes) where the access aisle adjacent to the passenger drop-off space adjoins the vehicular way (PAAL). 3. Clarify the designation of Common Areas on the plan. Each use (detention http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=922 11 /09/2010 Town Council Page 11 of 11 basin, parking and landscaping) must be labeled separately as "Common Areas A, B and C". 4. Revise the Clerk signature approval block to specify the correct year, removing the reference to administrative approval and Planning & Zoning Administrator and include reference to preliminary plat. 5. Correctly label the required bicycle parking on the plan (Class I and II). 6. The following Oro Valley Water Utility comments must be addressed: - Water infrastructure cannot be approved as shown. - Each lot must have a separate domestic and fire service. - Domestic service must come off of the main not a fire service. MOTION carried, 6-0. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Councilmember Snider/Second by Councilmember Spoerl: June 16, 2010 Council agenda - Discussion/possible action regarding options for the 2010/11 Vista newsletter Councilmember Snider/Second by Councilmember Carter: June 16, 2010 Council agenda - Discussion/possible action regarding the Board and Commission appointment process and possible extension of current terms CALL TO AUDIENCE Bill Adler, Oro Valley resident, commented that the Town's Public Participation ordinance requires that a neighborhood meeting be held for development plans. He stated that there was no provision in the ordinance that made exceptions for applications that have been previously considered. He stated that these meetings educate the citizens of pertinent sections of the Zoning Code provisions and General Plan policies. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: A motion was made by Councilmember Carter and seconded by Councilmember Snider to adjourn at 8:21 p.m. MOTION carried, 6-0. http://orovalley,granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=922 11 /09/2010 Item #: b. TC Regular Session Date: 05/19/2010 Requested by: Bayer Vella, Conservation and Sustainability Manager Submitted By: Bayer Vella, Planning and Zoning Department: Planning and Zoning Information SUBJECT: Presentation by the Office of Conservation & Sustainability regarding landscaping and architecture associated with new covered parking to support solar photovoltaic panels at the Town Hall Complex SUMMARY: The project entails an extensive retrofit of the Town Hall Complex parking lot. Approximately 176 parking spaces will be covered in a manner to support 1,320 solar panels. The power will be transmitted to the TEP electrical grid and garner credits to offset 60% of the total annual power consumed within the Administration Building, Water Utility, Municipal Court, Police, and Development Services. The proposed landscape plan includes the following key components: • Re -planting of select landscape islands with vegetation that will survive without irrigation after establishment • A total of 11 landscape islands will be removed in order to efficiently position the solar covered parking. This will also result in more parking spaces. • Select parking lot trees will be mitigated. Mitigation is necessary in order to preclude screening of solar panels. • New landscaping, as part of mitigation, will be established at the primary entrance on La Canada Drive, the west side of the Police Department building, and on the northwest side of the library. In terms of architecture for the solar covered parking, the following is germane: • There will be three types of parking structure modules: - "T" like configuration for double rows of parking along a north and south orientation. - Inverted "L" for single rows of parking along a north and south orientation. - Traditional 4 post configuration for east and south orientation to allow optimal energy production angles. • Structures will be painted to match the same desert beige color of the Administration building exterior walls. • The solar panels will include a metal frame with either black (monocrystalline) or blue (polycrystalline) cells. The current plan is to use the blue panels that have a slightly lower power efficiency rating than the black. Staff is researching the possibility of upgrading to black cells if pricing is comparable. DISCUSSION: The solar covered parking is positioned in a manner to maximize energy production. Project financing requires sufficient production capacity to insure capture of performance based financial incentives approved by Tucson Electric Power. For this reason, solar covered parking is proposed only in areas with north and south or east and west orientations. Parking areas that are not strictly oriented in this manner are excluded — which includes visitor parking adjacent to the Magistrate Court building. A landscape plan provides a planting schedule of transplanted and nursery plants, as well as irrigation plan for use in development projects. In this case, the need for a landscape plan is a result of the mitigation required to accommodate solar covered parking. Mitigation is necessitated to insure that vegetation does not screen any of the solar cells in the following areas: • Parking Rows Section 27.7H.1.f. of the OVZCR requires that "every nine parking spaces shall include a landscape island" that is 10' by 20' and includes a tree. When covered parking is installed, a tree is essentially sandwiched between parking structures. As a tree grows above the canopy height, it will significantly hamper the output of a solar cell. Furthermore, there is little utility in planting low lying vegetation in the 10 feet between structures due to the lack of sunlight penetration. • Parking Space Edges The same section of code requires that parking islands be provided at the start and end of a parking row in order to define traffic circulation. A tree is also required within this area. Again, tree growth next to a solar structure is detrimental to energy production. Resolution of these issues is proposed by: - Eliminating parking islands within rows with the side benefit of added parking spaces. - Replanting parking space edges to include drought tolerant vegetation that will not reach parking canopy height at maturity. - As specified in the Office of Conservation and Sustainability Work Plan, staff will comprehensively address zoning requirements that hamper use of alternative energy. After careful analysis by Parks & Recreation, Public Works, Water Utility, and OCS staff, all thirty five trees impacting solar arrays will be removed and mitigated above and beyond zoning code requirements. The rationale for this is as follows: • Transplanting of all trees would likely result in severe breaking of surrounding pavement. • A certified arborist, James Gardner of OV Parks and Recreation, has determined that the majority of the trees would not survive transplant. • Only 11 of the 35 trees are "native" plants. Given the restriction to use native plants in our new landscape conservation code, transplant of non -natives is not warranted. • A private sector developer would not be required to address salvage and mitigation when redeveloping a parking lot that was landscaped with nursery stock trees. Planned mitigation includes the following: • All 11 natives (Blue Palo -Verde trees) will be mitigated per code requirements. A new tree of the similar size and same species will be planted in a new area with emphasis on energy savings (reduce heat gain on buildings) and aesthetics. Per code, five (5) understory plants per mitigated native tree. • Non -natives do not require mitigation per code. Staff will plant a 15 gallon native tree for each of the non -natives removed as a result of the solar project. This insures this project does not counteract other beneficial green aspects of Town Hall. • The main entry will be landscaped with native vegetation as a low water use demonstration project. • The Police Building receives considerable heat on the west side from the sun. Trees will be added to save energy. • Trees will also be planted in an area with little vegetation on the northwest side of the library. • The saguaro in the library parking lot will remain in place. • Existing parking islands that will be underneath the solar covered parking will be converted into new parking spaces. • Landscape design insures no use of irrigation after plant establishment. In sum, the proposed plans meet all relevant General Plan polices and the OVZCR, except as noted herein. The zoning code will be updated to address such barriers to alternative energy production. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of plant mitigation has been incorporated into the project budget. Costs have been minimized by the following measures: • The Native Plant Preservation Plan and Landscape Plan were designed by qualified Town staff. • Planting will be accomplished by qualified Town staff. In sum, there are no impacts to the Town's General Fund. CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION: Staff finds that the proposed landscape plan and architectural renderings comply with all applicable General Plan policies, Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised (OVZCR) requirements (with exceptions as described herein), and Design Guidelines. SUGGESTED MOTION: This provides an update on the progress of the project and requires no action of Council. MINUTES ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD REGULAR SESSION May 11, 2010 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE CALL TO ORDER REGULAR SESSION AT OR AROUND 6:00 P.M. Vice Chair Schoeppach called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Michael Schoeppach, Vice -Chair Ray Shelton, Member Gene Wowk, Member Richard Luckett, Member Dennis Ottley, Member EXCUSED: Jill Anderson, Member PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Vice Chair Schoeppach led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. CALL TO THE AUDIENCE Opened and closed without comment. CONSENT AGENDA Vice Chair Schoeppach requested to move the April 13, 2010, minutes to be heard first on the Regular Agenda. A. Review and/or approval of the April 13, 2010, DRB meeting minutes. REGULAR AGENDA A. Review and/or approval of the April 13, 2010, DRB meeting minutes. Vice Chair Schoeppach requested grammatical changes to the minutes. The requested changes have been noted. MOTION: A motion was made by Member Shelton and seconded by Member Luckett to approve the April 13, 2010, DRB meeting minutes as amended. MOTION carried, 5-0. Election of Development Review Board chair and vice chair. MOTION: A motion was made by Member Shelton and seconded by Member Wowk to elect Vice Chair Schoeppach as Chairman of the Development Review Board. MOTION carried, 5-0. MOTION: A motion was made by Member Ottley and seconded by Member Shelton to elect Member Wowk as Vice -Chair of the Development Review Board. Member Wowk is elected Vice Chair of the Development Review Board by acclamation. 2. OV12-08-07 & 07A, Desco Southwest, represented by Rick Engineering Company, requests approval of a master development plan, development plan for phase 1 & 2, master landscape plan and landscape plan for phase 1 & 2 of the Miller Ranch Development, located on the northwest corner of Tangerine Road and La Canada Drive. For questions and additional information, please contact David Ronquillo, Senior Planner, at (520) 229- 4817 or dronquillo@orovalleyaz.gov. Michael Sarabia, non resident, representing the applicant presented the proposal and reviewed the following: - Location map - Project site - Overall project layout - Site plan - Commercial site plan - Phase I Tech Park - Phase II Tech Park - Phase III Tech Park - Grading and drainage concept - Landscape concept - Wash restoration concept will bring the wash back to what it was before Miller Ranch Mr. Sarabia said the project meets Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised (OVZCR). Member Wowk asked if there has been resistance from the neighborhood (AF Sterling). Mr. Sarabia responded no resistance has been received on the latest plan and they have worked with the neighbors in the past and made modifications. Member Luckett asked for a description of the Tech Park category and asked if the applicant had possible tenants. Mr. Sarabia responded the category of Tech Park includes medical office, clean rooms and light manufacturing. Mr. Sarabia said the applicant has been working with some bio tech firms and clean room operators that are interested in the area. Chairman Schoeppach requested that the landscape plan proposal be reviewed at this time. Mark Fellinger, of Rick Engineering, non resident, said native and drought tolerant material has been used, 30 foot buffers on all sides of the project, with a diverse plant list. The focus has been more on wash restoration elements and the proposal is to restore the wash to what was there previously. An enhancement of what remains of the natural wash will be the focus area. On the east side of the wash between the wash and the development there will be a 5 foot trail that will run the entire length of the project and should be useable most of the time. The material will be a native soil with a stabilizer. There will be a couple of seating areas along the trail. The trail will connect to the development in three areas. Some water harvesting has been incorporated into the wash restoration area. The plants will be irrigated in the beginning, then rely on water harvesting. Member Wowk asked if water harvesting off the building was planned. Mr. Fellinger responded no water harvesting at the discharge points off of the building is planned. Member Luckett asked if the wash restoration plan would move forward like the development plan from the south to the north or would the wash restoration be an early phase that would be completed before any new construction starts. Mr. Sarabia responded the wash restoration would be phased along with the project and the applicant is looking into water harvesting off of the building along with solar for the site. David Ronquillo, OV Senior Planner, presented the staff report and said the project will be developed in four different phases. Mr. Ronquillo said phase 1 and 2 are both in conformance with all of the zoning code requirements and had a total of 8 buildings including a bank. Mr. Ronquillo reviewed the following.- - Location map -only the eastern portion of the area is before the DRB - Master plan - The entire development (east of the wash) would include 13 buildings and approximately 189K square feet The project provides pedestrian connectivity and court yards with amenities. The developer has provided extensive landscaping. A transit station has been provided along with carpool spaces. Mr. Ronquillo stated all four components of the project meet the general plan policies and OVZCR requirement's and staff recommended approval with the conditions in Exhibit A. Mr. Ronquillo explained one of the conditions in Exhibit A will require the applicant and staff to discuss further how the wash restoration will be implemented. Chairman Schoeppach asked if Sunkist Road currently exists. Joe Andrews, OV Civil Attorney, said the road is an unimproved county road that has been called Sunkist. Bill Adler, OV resident, said the applicant and staff indicated that there has never been any public comment. Mr. Adler said when the property was rezoned the Town did not have in place the ordinance that requires the neighbors be educated with regard to their entitlements as well as the entitlements of the property owner. Mr. Adler strongly recommended the DRB insist that a neighborhood meeting be held. These educational meetings are required by our (Town) ordinance. Member Wowk asked if any neighborhood meetings have taken place. Mr. Sarabia responded that meetings have been held and have resulted in the building heights and setbacks being changed to accommodate the neighbors concerns. Adelina Kempner, OV resident, said she is a board member of Vistoso Gateway and as far as she knows none of her neighbors are aware of what is going on. Ms. Kempner asked if the mesquite trees being planted are native trees. Ms. Kempner asked to stop the process so that neighbors can be educated as to what is going on. Mr. Ronquillo said the trees being proposed are on the approved plant list and that neighbors have been notified of the proposal but only two people have sent an email expressing concern. This project was submitted before the new ordinance that requires neighborhood meetings be held. Mr. Ronquillo said meetings have been held as part of the General Plan Amendment and Rezoning process for this project. Notices have been sent out to the neighbors and there have been no comments from the neighbors. Staff did not require a neighborhood meeting because there have been no comments from the neighbors. Any input that was received has been taken into consideration and modifications made. Member Ottley asked how many homes in the subdivision and how many residents have been notified. Member Luckett asked if when the architectural plans start coming in will the Town renotice to the neighbors. Mr. Ronquillo responded renotice is not required. Chairman Schoeppach asked if the applicant was in agreement with the items on Exhibit A, Mr. Sarabia affirmed that they are aware of the items on Exhibit A and the applicant is in agreement. Member Wowk asked if the applicant would be willing to have a neighborhood meeting. Mr. Sarabia responded that the applicant has had numerous meetings throughout the process and was not willing to put the project on hold. MOTION: A motion was made by Member Ottley and seconded by Member Shelton to approve OV12-08-07 & 07A, master development plan, development plan for phase 1 & 2, master landscape plan and landscape plan for phase 1 & 2 of the Miller Ranch Development, located on the northwest corner of Tangerine Road and La Canada Drive, subject to the conditions in Exhibit A. MOTION carried, 5-0. 3. OV12-10-03, Kelly Copeland, represented by Coronado Engineering & Development Inc., requests approval of a development plan and landscape plan for Villa Fatima skilled nursing facility, located on the northwest corner of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and Sun City Boulevard. For questions and additional information, please contact David Ronquillo, Senior Planner, at (520) 229-4817or dronquillo@orovalleyaz.gov. Paul Nzomo of Coronado engineering, presented the proposal. Mr. Nzomo reviewed the proposed site and showed views from all areas. Mr. Nzomo reviewed the location. He continued and reviewed the existing zoning (C-1) and said the maximum height allowed is 24 feet. The developer adjusted the height to 16 feet because of neighbor concerns. Mr. Nzomo said meetings have taken place with the neighbors and with the Sun City HOA. Mr. Nzomo explained the grading and fill that would need to take place. Kelly Copeland, non resident, owner and developer said the original building was built with the neighbors concerns considered and modifications were made such as the height of the roof. The roof was kept low at 16 feet and flat. Other input included landscape concerns that were also included. This proposal will be similar to what is currently in place and once again neighbors concerns were addressed and the changes have been included in the current proposal. The biggest neighborhood opposition has been the use; an Alzheimer's facility. Mr. Copeland said this development will bring 40-50 skilled jobs to the area. Member Wowk asked what the current building is used for. Mr. Copeland responded the building is empty. David Ronquillo, OV Senior Planner, presented the staff report and reviewed the following: - Location - Resident concerns (noise, parking, building height and mass, circulation, landscaping, 24/7 operating hours) Mr. Ronquillo said the applicant has gone through the neighborhood meeting process and has done as much as he can however, there are some neighbors that are not happy with the development. Mr. Ronquillo said in general the proposal meets all zoning code requirements with regard to parking, connectivity and passenger drop-off. The proposed architecture will be brought to the DRB at a later date. Mr. Ronquillo said in general the proposal is in conformance with all zoning code requirements with regard to the development plan. Mr. Ronquillo showed images of the site and pointed out that some of the improvements have not been completed but have been added to the conditions of approval on the current proposal. Mr. Ronquillo reviewed the landscape plan and said the plan meets all zoning code requirements. Mr. Ronquillo said the proposal meets all zoning code requirements and staff recommended approval subject to the conditions in Exhibit A. Member Ottley asked if the property has always been zoned C-1 Commercial. Mr. Ronquillo affirmed. Chairman Schoeppach called for a recess at 7:20 p.m. Chairman Schoeppach reconvened the meeting at 7:32 p.m. Chairman Schoeppach asked the applicant if they had seen the items on Exhibit A. Mr. Copeland said he agrees with the conditions on Exhibit A. Jan Atwood, OV resident, asked how to access the facility for people who are handicapped or arthritic. Mr. Nzomo responded and said that access will be in front of the building at the porte-cochere and handicap parking will be provided on the building level. Dr. John Wadleogh, OV resident, said there is a need for Alzheimer care not only in Oro Valley but all of southern Arizona. John Joers, OV resident, said he felt that Kelly Copeland was going to make a good neighbor. Rethea Browning, OV resident, said Mr. Copeland has been very nice and he has said that he owns 10 acres at Drexel and Irvington. Residents have asked Mr. Copeland to develop that area rather than his Oro Valley property. We are concerned that we will have a larger empty shell. The original homeowners in the area paid an extra 10K for their views and we are very concerned about the operation being open 24/7, the distance to our back yard and if Mr. Copeland raises our fences as he has said he would, we would lose our mountain views. Charles Sullivan, OV resident, said he has been misled and the whole thing is a big mistake. Mr. Copeland has offered to raise their wall and there is nothing natural about what is being proposed. Mr. Sullivan expressed concern regarding the building height. Jack Evert, OV resident, said he was involved as a member of DRC and was impressed with the way Mr. Copeland dealt with us (DRC) and followed through. Most people would be happy if there were no building being built but, we are a victim of the economy and it requires the lot to be raised. This is regrettable but Mr. Copeland has been credible and I hope that he will continue to strive to be a good neighbor to the people that will be directly impacted; the residents to the north. Neil Rydberg, OV resident, said he was in favor of the project. MOTION: A motion was made by Member Luckett and seconded by Member Shelton to approve OV12-10-03, Kelly Copeland, represented by Coronado Engineering & Development Inc., requests approval of a development plan and landscape plan for Villa Fatima skilled nursing facility, located on the northwest corner of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and Sun City Boulevard subject to the conditions in Exhibit A. Member Ottley stated the need for this type of facility is huge as Alzheimer's becomes an ever increasing problem in our society. In addition, he said he was impressed by the fact that Mr. Copeland has been so involved in the community, making a lot of changes to his proposal, and has neighbors in support of the plan. This is a project well worthwhile. MOTION carried, 5-0. 4. OV12-10-08 and OV13-10-04, the Town Office of Conservation & Sustainability requests approval of architecture and landscaping associated with new covered parking that supports solar photovoltaic panels at the Town Hall Complex, located at the southeast corner of the La Canada Drive and Naranja Drive intersection. For additional information, please contact Bayer Vella, Office of Conservation & Sustainability Manager, at (520) 229-4810 or bvella@orovalleyaz.gov. Bayer Vella, Manager, OV Office of Conservation and Sustainability, presented the proposal and reviewed the following: - Energy Efficiency Conservation Block Grant - Performance contracting - Major improvement list Mr. Vella said the 1300 solar panels will provide 60% of the energy needs of all the buildings excluding the library on a yearly basis. Mr. Vella showed one solar panel and explained that the panels will serve as the roof of the covered parking. Mr. Vella reviewed the angles that the panels will be placed, continued and reviewed the following: - Impact design and color - Polycrystalline panels - Under canopy design - Landscape plan - Shade management - Parking island retrofit - Mitigation area- front entrance, library and police department Mr. Vella said work should begin in August 2010. Mr. Vella said the maintenance of the panel will require someone to mop the top to eliminate dust and periodically check for any frayed wires. Member Shelton asked how long it will take to pay the mortgage off. Mr. Vella responded payoff would be achieved in approximately 9 years. Mr. Vella reminded the DRB that financing has already been approved. MOTION: A motion was made by Member Shelton and seconded by Member Ottley to approve OV12-10-08 and OV13-10-04, the Town Office of Conservation & Sustainability requests approval of architecture and landscaping associated with new covered parking that supports solar photovoltaic panels at the Town Hall Complex, located at the southeast corner of the La Canada Drive and Naranja Drive intersection. Member Ottley added that solar is showing up everywhere, there are two golf carts with solar panels on the roof at the Heritage Highlands golf club. MOTION carried, 5-0. 5. Planning and Zoning update. David Ronquillo, OV Senior Planner, reviewed items that will come before Town Council and the Planning & Zoning Commission. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: A motion was made by Member Ottley and seconded by Member Shelton to adjourn the DRB meeting at 8:23 p.m. MOTION carried, 5-0. Prepared by, Deanna Ruiz Recording Secretary TOWN OF ORO VALLEY STAFF REPORT TO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING DATE: May 11, 2010 TO: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD FROM: Bayer Vella, AICP, Office of Conservation & Sustainability SUBJECT: OV12-10-08 and OV13-10-04, the Town Office of Conservation & Sustainability requests approval of architecture and landscaping associated with new covered parking that supports solar photovoltaic panels at the Town Hall Complex, located at the southeast corner of the La Canada Drive and Naranja Drive intersection. Summary The project entails an extensive retrofit of the Town Hall Complex parking lot. Approximately 176 parking spaces will be covered in a manner to support 1,320 solar panels. The power will be transmitted to the TEP electrical grid and garner credits to offset 60% of the total annual power consumed within the Administration Building, Water Utility, Municipal Court, Police, and Development Services. The proposed landscape plan includes the following key components: • Re -planting of select landscape islands with vegetation that will survive without irrigation after establishment • A total of 11 landscape islands will be removed in order to efficiently position the solar covered parking. This will also result in more parking spaces. • Select parking lot trees will be mitigated. Mitigation is necessary in order to preclude screening of solar panels. • New landscaping, as part of mitigation, will be established at the primary entrance on La Canada Drive, the west side of the Police Department building, and on the northwest side of the library. In terms of architecture for the solar covered parking, the following is germane: • There will be three types of parking structure modules: ✓ "T" like configuration for double rows of parking along a north and south orientation. ✓ Inverted "L" for single rows of parking along a north and south orientation. ✓ Traditional 4 post configuration for east and south orientation to allow optimal energy production angles. • Structures will be painted to match the same desert beige color of the Administration building exterior walls. • The solar panels will include a metal frame with either black (monocrystalline) or blue (polycrystalline) cells. The current plan is to use the blue panels that have a slightly lower power efficiency rating than the black. Staff is researching the possibility of upgrading to black cells if pricing is comparable. Discussion: The solar covered parking is positioned in a manner to maximize energy production. Project financing requires sufficient production capacity to insure capture of performance based financial incentives approved by Tucson Electric Power. For this reason, solar covered parking is proposed only in areas with north and south or east and west orientations. Parking areas that are not strictly oriented in this manner are excluded — which includes visitor parking adjacent to the Magistrate Court building. A landscape plan provides a planting schedule of transplanted and nursery plants, as well as irrigation plan for use in development projects. In this case, the need for a landscape plan is a result of the mitigation required to accommodate solar covered parking. Mitigation is necessitated to insure that vegetation does TOWN OF ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD,OV12-10-08 and OV13-10-04 Page 2 of 3 not screen any of the solar cells in the following areas: Parking Rows Section 27.7H.1.f. of the OVZCR requires that "every nine parking spaces shall include a landscape island" that is 10' by 20' and includes a tree. When covered parking is installed, a tree is essentially sandwiched between parking structures. As a tree grows above the canopy height, it will significantly hamper the output of a solar cell. Furthermore, there is little utility in planting low lying vegetation in the 10 feet between structures due to the lack of sunlight penetration. • Parking Space Edges The same section of code requires that parking islands be provided at the start and end of a parking row in order to define traffic circulation. A tree is also required within this area. Again, tree growth next to a solar structure is detrimental to energy production. Resolution of these issues is proposed by: ✓ Eliminate parking islands within rows with side benefit of added parking spaces. ✓ Replant parking space edges to include drought tolerant vegetation that will not reach parking canopy height at maturity. ✓ As specified in the Office of Conservation and Sustainability Work Plan, staff will comprehensively address zoning requirements that hamper use of alternative energy. After careful analysis by Parks & Recreation, Public Works, Water Utility, and OCS staff, all thirty five trees impacting solar arrays will be removed and mitigated above and beyond zoning code requirements. Rationale: • Transplant of all trees would likely result in severe breaking of surrounding pavement. • It has been determined that the majority would not survive transplant by a certified arborist, James Garner, OV Parks & Recreation. • Only 11 of the 35 trees are "native" plants. Given the restriction to use native plants in our new landscape conservation code, transplant of non -natives is not warranted. • A private sector developer would not be required to address salvage and mitigation when redeveloping a parking lot that was landscaped with nursery stock trees. Planned mitigation includes the following: • All 11 natives (Blue Palo -Verde trees) will be mitigated per code requirements. A new tree of the similar size and same species will be planted in a new area with emphasis on energy savings (reduce heat gain on buildings) and aesthetics. Per code, five (5) understory plants per mitigated native tree. • Non -natives do not require mitigation per code. Staff will plant a 15 gallon native tree for each of the non - natives removed as a result of the solar project. This insures this project does not counteract other beneficial green aspects of Town Hall. • The main entry will be landscaped with native vegetation as a low water use demonstration project. • The Police Building receives considerable heat on the west side from the sun. Trees will be added to save energy. • Trees will also be planted in an area with little vegetation on the northwest side of the library. • The saguaro in the library parking lot will remain in place. • Existing parking islands that will be underneath the solar covered parking will be converted into new parking spaces. • Landscape design insures no use of irrigation after plant establishment. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD,OV12-10-08 and OV13-10-04 Page 3 of 3 In sum, the proposed plans meet all relevant General Plan polices and the OVZCR, except as noted herein. The zoning code will be updated to address such barriers to alternative energy production. RECOMMENDATION: Staff finds that the proposed landscape plan and architectural renderings comply with all applicable General Plan policies, OVZCR requirements (exceptions described herein), and Design Guidelines. Approval is recommended. SUGGESTED MOTION: The Development Review Board may wish to consider one of the following suggested motions: I move to [approve, approve with conditions, OR deny] the landscape plan, OV12-08-10, and architecture, OV13-10-04, for solar covered parking within the Oro Valley Town Hall Complex. Attachments: 1. Solar Covered Parking Site Plan 2. Landscape Plan 3. Architectural Elevations APPrtOV _D bV'• g/ ZiBRBIBO�e DATE PZ FfROJEM MANAUt:r-I /1 FUN V11"4�� .'1ILEVAnDN MAII if5d"1_� Note: Steel frame and decking paint color: Frazee CL 3217N - Topsoil APPROVED Y: T /P?-/DRB/BOA DA It PZ PROJECT MANAGER 4 -TOW% HAt 1, 1 RANUI IN I R Al"Iff T.N[l•A\CiAll-\ I I ANDSCAPF AND Si IT ' RI'SOHRUF INVEN I ORY Pl.nNs FOR To\,%,ii of Oro Valley I-mvii Flall Solar Parking Canopy Installation And Imrance Moriumentallon Enhancements I 1 000 NOR I II I A (. A NA I )/% R OA I ( ) \ I 1- 1()-()8 1�lh III N\ .7 ftmona* ;All law TC/PZ/D R 8/8 1 -� -- I 1. DATE 0 0- 0 PZ PRO z NAGER 0 SIII I I 1 1) LN I( UR N( C. r rru rr (W 12 - 1 (1-1 SCALES SHEET I OF 5 SEE SHEET #3 - NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLAN: I SEE SHEET #4, 5 & 6 - LANDSCAPE PLAN & DETAIL SHEETS: e a o e o c R Ik �1-1 0 g �O OQ SEF. SHEET #3 - NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLAN: WI Z^ Q Z r U C 777 I Q O Q 2 6' 3 } 0ti �m Qffi Z L E ry ?d —or � ��IN.�:INMRMN Pogl9osm uIA(= OV I2-10-08 HOPj. NIA_ SCALES vex. --NIA- SHEET 2 OF 6 SIGNIFICANT NATiVF. PLANT LiST 1N CONSTRUCTION AREA i 5]'AIP01. III1fANll'Ai. NAME CUMMUN NAME. DIgHIBI IIfIN CARNCOEA GIGANTICA SAGUARO LEAK IN PUCE 00 NpT DISTURB TREES TO BE REMOVED NOTl3; I. AI,I,rAI) Npi. RI'NI\I) fl 'IIAII II1111. 111 1 P (I'. NI'I: I I Ix' NV r. :'1 WII1111AI 1/ ?. AI,I, NfM INI iHl I'.: 1) I I I NI VI:D Ri 11 '. INN 1 1 .. AN1'N' V III I XI`E(I311 Ir.l NIISK A 1'rI AA' ). INLISi III NI AIO\'I:bnNI—All .[pn PI \V HILL. 4J AAD1111 V1111 IN 1. (UNLIT:. I' NUINLIlll.l. M1l Allll:x 1111 U\\' '1%r:li NllAlI11:N I tA1.NA.MI: IIAIgIUN NAMI�. 1:%IX fI\II51/I. NAIIVI:ON NIINNAll1'N, IIII�.1. 1 CCRCIDNM iLORNUM BLUE PALO VERDE 6' DBH x 19'H NADK TREE 2 CEPCIpIVM FLORq)UM BLUE PALO KRpC ]" MULD-STEM NAIVE TREE ] CERCIDIUN iLORIDUM BLUE PALO KRDE A' DBH % 19'H NADK TREC 4 CERCIDIUN PLOflIDUM BLUE PALO KRDE 1' MUCH -STEM NATIVE THEE 5 URCIOIUM FLORIDU4 BLUE PALO KRDE 1' GBH N 10'N NATIVE TREE 6 CERCIDIUN RORIDNI BLUE PALO KRDE 16' DBH x 25'N NATIVE TREE 7 PROSOPIS CMILENSIS CHILEAN MESQUITE jl' DBH K 35'H NON-NAIIK TREE B CERCIpIVAI RORIDUM BLUE PALO KRDC 12' DBH x 25'N NATIVE TREE 9 PROSOMS THORNLESS HYBRID HYBRID MESQUITE 16' DBN % JO'N NON-NAIIK TREE 10 CCRCIOIUM iLORIDUM BLUE PALO KRDC g" DBH X JOW NATIVE TREE II PR050P15 iH011NLE55 HYBRID HYBRID MESQUITE g' DDH % IS'H NON -NAIVE TREE 11 f.ERL101U41 fLORIDUM BLUE PALO KRDE tT' pBH % TO'N NATIVE TREE 13 CERCIDIUN ROpIDUM BLUE PALO KRDC 1' DBH z 25'H NARK TREE II CERCIDIUN RORIpUU BLUE PALO KRDE 10' DBH % 1E'H NARK TREE 19 PROSOPIS CHILEN515 CHILEAN MESQUITE IR' pBH x .)nN NON-NATIVE TREE Ig PROSOPIS CHILENSIS CHILEAN MESQUITE Ij' DBH X 25'H NON-NAHK TREE IT ACACIA f1RNESIAN4 SWEET ACACIA 1' DBM N 10'H NON-NATIVE TREE IB ACACIA fARNE5IANA SWEET ACACIA g' pBH X 15'H NOf:-NAnK TREE III ACACIA fApNESInNA SHEET ACACIA j' MULD-STEM NON-NATK TREE TO ACACIA fAPNE5IANA SWEET ACACIA /' DBH Y 10'H Nbl-NATK TREE jt PROSOPIS CHIIiNSS CHILEAN MESQUITE 10" DBN % 30'H NON-NAIIK TREE jj PROSOPIS CNILEN5IS CHILEAN MESQUITE fi' DOUBLE LEAD NON -HANK 7REE TS PR050P15 CMILEN515 CHILEAN MESWILE 18' pBH % 30'H NON-NATK TREE jl PROSOPIS THORNLESS HYBRID HYBRID MESQUITE 9' DBH % 20'H NON-NADK TREE 29 PROSOPIS THORNLESS HYBRID HYBRID MESQUITE 6" DBH % 16'H NON-NATIVE TREE T6 PROSOPIS THORNLESS HYBRID HYBRID MESQUITE b' DBH % W. NON-NAIIK TREE 27 PROSOPI$ THORNLESS HYBRID HYBRID M($WIiE 1' MULTI -STEM NON-NATIVE TREE TB PROSOPIS THORNLESS HYBRID HYBRID MESQUITE g' pBH % 204H NON -NA TIK TREE 29 PROSOPIS THORNLESS HYBRID HYBRID MESQUITE 5' DBH % tT'H NON-NAIIK TREE JO PROSOPIS THORNLESS HYBRID HYBRID MESQUITE 1' DBH X 10'H NON-NATIVE TREE ll PROSOPIS THORNLESS HYBRID HYBRIp MESQUITE g' DBH X T$'H NON-NATIVE TREE Jj PROSOPI$ THORNLESS HYBRID HYBRID MCSOUITE B" Co. % 29'H NDN-NAIIK TREE 33 PROSOP6 HORNLESS HYBRID HYBRID MESQUITE fi' pBH % TO'H NON -NAIVE TREE J/ PROSOPIS 7HOR4LE55 HYBRID HYBRID ME$OUI TE fi' MUlfl-SiCM NON-Nn LIVE TRCE ]5 PROSOPIS THORNLESS HYBRID HYBRID MESQUITE B" pBH N I$'H NON -rvAHK TREE LANDSCAPF, PLAN PLANT LEGEND RYLIItI)1 INITInI IIU'IANI('AI. Nn\II 'UXIAl11N NAAiI Hlnl OfY CERCIDIUN FLUHIOUM Pµ0 KRDC TA' BOY II PITNEtfLLOBiUM ttE%I[AULE 1E%AS EBONY i5 GAL e AG AGAK GEMIwFLOR♦ TYnN-FLOWERED AGAK 19 GAL 2 ❑ AL ACA�IE LUPHANTHA HOLLY AGAK 9 GAL 6 AN AC.AK HUACHUCEN$I$ HUALMUCA AGAVE 19 GAL 6 AV AG ME NCTOMAE-R[GPVAC QUEEN VICTORIA ACAK $ GAL II AB ALOE BARBApEN$IS ALOC VERA $GAL 19 Ar ALQ. fF.gO% CAPE ALOE IS GAL 2 AS ALOE $APONARIA TIGER ALOE 9 GAL 21 CALYDPHUS MARTKEGII YELLOW PRIMROSE 5 GAL b Q CONVOIVUWfi CNEtlRUM BUSH MORNING GLORY S GAL 9 OCORMa BOISSERI tExAS OI.IK IS GAL 1 ECHINOCACTUS GPUSOIaII GOLDEN DARR[L CACTUS I$ GAL 12 O ELIIINOCCRF.uS TRIGLOCHIpIAi CLARET CUP HEDGEHOG CAC fUS 19 GAL b CPEMOPHILIe pECIPIEnS EMU BUSH 5 GAL 10 U. EIIPHORRIA pIG10A GOPHER PLAN 9 GAL ] iOVUUIERIA SPLENUENS OCOTILLO I$ GAL I HF HCSPEpnLOC FUNIFERA GIANT HESPERAL(1E IS Wl I NP HCSPERALOE PPRVtfLORn RED YUCCA 9 GAL IS Q. .A15T:CIA $PICIGERA MEXICAN HONEYSUCNLf S CAL 5 Q lC IEVCOPHYLLUM CANDIOUM THUNDER CLOUD LEUCOPHiLLUM 19 GAL 1 LI LCUCOP)IYLIUM 2YGOPHYLLUAI BLUE RANGER 19 GAL 2 OEVOTHCRn SPECIOSn MEXICAN PRIMROSE S GAL 9 OPUNHA MACROCENTRe BLACK SPINE PRICKLY PEAR 9 GAL ID iROHpCEREUS SP. TRICHOCEREUS rl vpR105 t9 GAL 5 YN YUCCA BACCAIA DANnNA NCCA IS GAL 1 -IZY rR YUCCA ROSTRATA BEAKED YUCCA 19 GAL 2 LANDSCAPE PLAN ACCENT MATERIAL LEGEND YLIRU f.AAI. f• Dou(pERs \A 1:\ SI.I,\ �\ I ION Pl,,\\ SIA , I. : llk PI AAi I W I I'll I SHEET 3 OF 6 APS Erv,,Tr gy d.7 - -C's L .M 1, s'.Ep - VIM �is Fco. 171 I D DI I U > ANq-D WI KA 64 SEE "a5-%M. mIAI.s ,i JRWW ,M Mlzo -ZR-IhC -0M . .... . ............. . . . ....... ...... .... SCALES SHEET 5 OF 6 -0 y iv 5 133HS SB'VDS SIM10 -- -------- �7 L I I VI-10 .... ........ . . ........ . )IY 31OW,'. JAIIWII ,7, a — -- ------ - 00 11 si Dl- I Alt. -,. E .. , r-,— k7AC (A 2�MANI SHEET 6 OF 6 w A:4 Dl. 1 AIL ... . . ... . ...... - - - - ------------- w Conditions for C1000054 Sec Item Id Description Approved Req Date Items Action Inheritable Item Origin * CON001374 FINAL ZONING INSPECTION SHALL No R 11/16/2010 0 No 3 VERIFY LANDSCAPING HAS BEEN INSTALLED PER APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLANS OV12-10-08 * CON001374 APPROVED COLOR FOR PARKING No R 11/16/2010 0 No 4 CANOPIES IS FRAZEE CL 3217N TOPSOIL CON001374 LIGHTING IS REVIEWED VIA PERMIT No R 11/16/2010 0 No 5 MB1000584. SEE MB1000584 FILE FOR APPROVED FIXTURES C0N001377 THE REQUIRED PAL WIDTH OF 24' No R 11/18/2010 0 No 2 MUST BE MAINTAINED AT ALL FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS LANES AS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED. * CON001380 'FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS. PLEASE No R 11/23/2010 0 No 8 MAINTAIN A MINMUM OF ONE FIRE TRUCK APPARATUS ACCESS LANE THRUOGH THE TOV CAMPUS FOR THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT. * BS0020 FIELD WELDING REQUIRES No R 11/29/2010 0 No SPECIAL INSPECTION BY AN ARIZONA LICENSED ENGINEER * CON001382 A SPECIAL INSPECTION IS No R 11/29/2010 0 No 1 REQUIRED FOR THE SOILS OBSERVATION PRIOR TO CONCRETE PLACEMENT IN FOOTINGS CON001385 THESE STRUCTURES MAY No R 12/02/2010 0 No 3 REQUIRE REVISIONS BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR COLUMNS SPACED OVER 18' ' CON001386 BEFORE CONCRETE IS POURED No R 12/02/2010 0 No 2 SEEPAGE E 3.1 PERMIT # MB1000584 FOR PLACEMENT OF GROUNDING PLATE FOR LIGHTING PROTECTION. CON001386 ALL OPEN TRENCHES WILL BE No R 12/02/2010 0 No 3 COVERED,PLATED OR PROTECTED THRU OUT JOBSITE. NO OPEN TRENCHES WILL BE LEFT OPEN OR UNATTENDED AFTER WORK HOURS, Page 1 15:42 05/10/2011 Conditions for C1000054 * CON001488 THE TOV SOLAR RAMADA No R 05/02/2011 0 No 2 STRUCTURE IS APPROVED WITH NOTES BY PHILIP O'CONNOR, CARUSO-TURLEY-SCOTT THE ENGINEERS OF RECORD PROVIDED A LETTER FOR CHANGES NOTED ON THE PLAN BY PHILIP O'CONNOR. 5/2/11 * CON001488 THIS SOLAR RAMADA PERMIT No R 05/02/2011 0 No 3 DOES NOT INCLUDE ELECTRICAL INFRASTRUCTURE,GROUNDING,BO NDING,OR LIGHTNING PROTECTION.ADDITION PERMITS ARE REQUIRED. Total Rows: 12 Page 2 15:42 05/10/2011 Inspection Items for C1000054 15:43 05/10/2011 Sec Item Id Description Appr Req Items Action Inheritable * 1005 EXCAVATION/LAYOUT REBAR & ZONE No R 12 PA No * 1025 EXTERIOR METAL CLIPS No R 1 FL No * 9757 SPC INSP STEEL/WELDING No R 1 PA No * 9751 SPC INSP SOILS COMPACTN RPT No R 1 NR No * 2005 ELECTRIC UFER No R 1 PA No * 1035 FINAL FRAME Yes R 3 AP No 1090 BUILDING FINAL No R 0 No * 9706 ZONING LANDSCAPE INSTALL No R 0 No * 9703 ZONING ARCHITECTURE No R 0 No * 9028 C OF O ZONING No R 0 No * 5290 FIRE CODE GEN (CALL 825- 5959 No R 0 No * 9026 C OF O FIRE APR CALL 825-5959 No R 0 No 9027 C OF O ENGINEERING APPROVAL No O 0 No * 9999 PERMIT FINALED No R 0 No Total Rows: 14 Page 1 NOTES 1. THE EXISTING ZONING IS EL CONQUISTADOR COUNTRY CLUB PAD - AREA D. THE USE OF THIS PROPERTY IS PUBLIC OFFICES AND IS PERMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE NO. 79 WHICH IS THE ADOPTION OF THE EL CONQUISTADOR PAD. 2. REMOVE ONLY THAT VEGETATION THAT IS NECESSARY FOR BUILDING THE PARKING CANOPIES AND ACCESSORY IMPROVEMENTS. ANY SIGNIFICANT VEGETATION DESTROYED IS TO BE REPLACED ACCORDING TO A RATIO TO BE DETERMINED BY THE ZONING INSPECTOR. 3. DUST CONTROL: ALL DISTURBED, GRADED OR BLADED AREAS NOT OTHERWISE IMPROVED SHALL BE TREATED WITH DECOMPOSED GRANITE 2" THICK . 4. FINISH GRADING OF THE LANDSCAPE AREAS AROUND THE BASE OF EACH TREE AND SHRUB SHALL BE DEPRESSED FROM THE EXISTING GROUND LEVEL TO ENHANCE MOISTURE STORAGE FOR THE PLANT. 5. ALL LANDSCAPING OR IMPROVEMENTS ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED OR MAINTAINED BETWEEN 30" TO 72" IN HEIGHT ABOVE ADJACENT CURB WITHIN ALL SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLES. 6. ALL PLANT SELECTIONS ARE FROM THE ORO VALLEY APPROVED PLANT LIST - TABLES C-3 AND C-4 7. ALL NEW PLANTS SHALL BE HAND WATERED THROUGH THE ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD. NO IRRIGATION SHALL BE PROVIDED. 8. REMOVED TREES SHALL BE CUT AS CLOSE TO THE GROUND AS POSSIBLE AND THE RESIDUAL STUMPS GROUND OUT TO MINIMIZE COLLATERAL DAMAGE TO EXISTING CONCRETE CURBS, ASPHALT AND EXISTING IRRIGATION. 11 Two working days before you dig, CALL FOR THE BLUE STAKES 800-782-5348 Blue Stake Center CALL COLLECT TOWN HALL ENTRANCE ENTRANCE ENHANCEMENTS SCALE: 1 "=10' 10 0 10 20 LANDSCAPE AND SITE RESOURCE INVENTORY N PLANS FOR Town of Oro Valley Town Hall Solar Parking Canopy Installation SCALE: 3"=1MI And Entrance Monumentation Enhancements THIS PROJECT 11,000 NORTH LA CANADA ROAD OV 12-10-08 SITE PLAN SCALE: 1 "=100' 100 0 100 200 LOCATION MAP LOCATED IN SECTION 11 T-13-S, R-12-E, G&SRM ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA APPrtOVED BY /P P5 /BOA ,.Q:RT P;Z PRG1C-PT MANAGER SHEET INDEX 1. COVER SHEET AND LANDSCAPE NOTES 2. LANDSCAPE PLANT LISTS 3. NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLAN 4. LANDSCAPE PLAN 5. LANDSCAPE DETAILS 6. LANDSCAPE DETAILS TOWN OF ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL MAYOR - PAUL H. LOOMIS VICE -MAYOR - WILLIAM GARNER COUNCIL MEMBER - MARY SNIDER COUNCIL MEMBER - KENNETH CARTER COUNCIL MEMBER - BARRY GILLASPIE COUNCIL MEMBER - PAT SPOERL OV 12-10-08 J_ m Q Z Q Z Q Z 0 Q oc V) z 0 U LL 0 L L1 _U L.L_ LL 0 LL J J Q 0 oC 0 LL 0 >Z 0 i- W Q 0 w w V) z 0 CL ce U V) w Q z O V) w Of A woo40o Q���� 0000(D LnLnLnLn o � m, CL CL CL m 0 o� w z3u; Z LU Z w O Q Q U CL J V) J L LI Q CL _OZZ Z Q �UCL O U LL ~ Z Q w�CU J Q 0 Q CL Z > Q Q OJ °C O O V„ 11 C13� U LO <0 �. L cd � �Ln 00 cd N U Q M o J 00 N � Z � N O N 0 0 6 =0 Ln �p SCALES HORZ. AS NOTED VERT. N/A SHEET I OF 6 SEE SHEET #3 - NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLAN: SIGNIFICANT NATIVE PLANT LIST IN CONSTRUCTION AREA SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME DISPOSITION CARNEGIEA GIGANTICA SAGUARO LEAVE IN PLACE DO NOT DISTURB SEE SHEET #3 - NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLAN: TREES TO BE REMOVED NOTES: 1. ALL PALO VERDE TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE REPLACED AT A 1:1 REPLACEMENT RATIO WITH UNDERSTORY PLANTING WITH LIKE SIZE 2. ALL REMAINING TREES TO BE REMOVED ARE NON-NATIVE. NO REPLACEMENT REQUIRED BY CODE. SHALL BE REPLACED ANYWAY WITH 15GAL SPECIMENS - SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN 3. TREES TO BE REMOVED ARE DETAILED ON PLAN SHEET 3 AND IDENTIFIED BY: ## WITH ## DESIGNATING THE CORRESPONDING TREE NUMBER BELOW TREE NUMBER 1 BOTANICAL NAME CERCIDIUM FLORIDUM COMMON NAME BLUE PALO VERDE EXISTING SIZE 6" DBH X 15'H NATIVE OR NON-NATIVE TREE NATIVE TREE 2 CERCIDIUM FLORIDUM BLUE PALO VERDE 3" MULTI -STEM NATIVE TREE 3 CERCIDIUM FLORIDUM BLUE PALO VERDE 4" DBH X 15'H NATIVE TREE 4 CERCIDIUM FLORIDUM BLUE PALO VERDE 4" MULTI -STEM NATIVE TREE 5 CERCIDIUM FLORIDUM BLUE PALO VERDE 4" DBH X 10'H NATIVE TREE 6 CERCIDIUM FLORIDUM BLUE PALO VERDE 16" DBH X 25'H NATIVE TREE 7 PROSOPIS CHILENSIS CHILEAN MESQUITE 24" DBH X 35'H NON-NATIVE TREE 8 CERCIDIUM FLORIDUM BLUE PALO VERDE 12" DBH X 25'H NATIVE TREE 9 PROSOPIS THORNLESS HYBRID HYBRID MESQUITE 16" DBH X 30'H NON-NATIVE TREE 10 CERCIDIUM FLORIDUM BLUE PALO VERDE 6" DBH X 30'H NATIVE TREE 11 PROSOPIS THORNLESS HYBRID HYBRID MESQUITE 8" DBH X 15'H NON-NATIVE TREE 12 CERCIDIUM FLORIDUM BLUE PALO VERDE 12" DBH X 20'H NATIVE TREE 13 CERCIDIUM FLORIDUM BLUE PALO VERDE 14" DBH X 25'H NATIVE TREE 14 CERCIDIUM FLORIDUM BLUE PALO VERDE 10" DBH X 15'H NATIVE TREE 15 PROSOPIS CHILENSIS CHILEAN MESQUITE 16" DBH X 3O'H NON-NATIVE TREE 16 PROSOPIS CHILENSIS CHILEAN MESQUITE 12" DBH X 25'H NON-NATIVE TREE 17 ACACIA FARNESIANA SWEET ACACIA 4" DBH X 1O'H NON-NATIVE TREE 18 ACACIA FARNESIANA SWEET ACACIA 6" DBH X 15'H NON-NATIVE TREE 19 ACACIA FARNESIANA SWEET ACACIA 2" MULTI -STEM NON-NATIVE TREE 20 ACACIA FARNESIANA SWEET ACACIA 4" DBH X 1O'H NON-NATIVE TREE 21 PROSOPIS CHILENSIS CHILEAN MESQUITE 10" DBH X 30'H NON-NATIVE TREE 22 PROSOPIS CHILENSIS CHILEAN MESQUITE 6" DOUBLE LEAD NON-NATIVE TREE 23 PROSOPIS CHILENSIS CHILEAN MESQUITE 16" DBH X 30'H NON-NATIVE TREE 24 PROSOPIS THORNLESS HYBRID HYBRID MESQUITE 5" DBH X 20'H NON-NATIVE TREE 25 PROSOPIS THORNLESS HYBRID HYBRID MESQUITE 6" DBH X 15'H NON-NATIVE TREE 26 PROSOPIS THORNLESS HYBRID HYBRID MESQUITE 6" DBH X 15'H NON-NATIVE TREE 27 PROSOPIS THORNLESS HYBRID HYBRID MESQUITE 4" MULTI -STEM NON-NATIVE TREE 28 PROSOPIS THORNLESS HYBRID HYBRID MESQUITE 8" DBH X 20'H NON-NATIVE TREE 29 PROSOPIS THORNLESS HYBRID HYBRID MESQUITE 5" DBH X 12'H NON-NATIVE TREE 30 PROSOPIS THORNLESS HYBRID HYBRID MESQUITE 4" DBH X 1O'H NON-NATIVE TREE 31 PROSOPIS THORNLESS HYBRID HYBRID MESQUITE 6" DBH X 25'H NON-NATIVE TREE 32 PROSOPIS THORNLESS HYBRID HYBRID MESQUITE 8" DBH X 25'H NON-NATIVE TREE 33 PROSOPIS THORNLESS HYBRID HYBRID MESQUITE 6" DBH X 20'H NON-NATIVE TREE 34 PROSOPIS THORNLESS HYBRID HYBRID MESQUITE 6" MULTI -STEM NON-NATIVE TREE 35 PROSOPIS THORNLESS HYBRID HYBRID MESQUITE 6" DBH X 15'H NON-NATIVE TREE Two working days before you dig CALL FOR THE BLUE STAKES 800-782-5348 Blue Stake Center CALL COLLECT SEE SHEET #4, 5 & 6 - LANDSCAPE PLAN & DETAIL SHEETS: SCALES HORZ. N/A VERT. N/A ,ND SIZE QTY 24" BOX 11 15 GAL 4 ,GAVE 15 GAL 2 5 GAL 6 15 GAL 6 AGAVE 5 GAL 11 5 GAL 19 15 GAL 2 5 GAL 21 5 GAL 6 ORY 5 GAL 9 15 GAL 1 ACTUS 15 GAL 12 EHOG CACTUS 15 GAL 6 5 GAL 10 5 GAL 7 15 GAL 1 15 GAL 1 5 GAL 16 DKLE 5 GAL 5 UCOPHYLLUM 15 GAL 1 15 GAL 2 5 GAL 9 CLY PEAR 5 GAL 10 RIDS 15 GAL 5 15 GAL 4 15 GAL 2 LEGEND APPROVED ¢Y. T /- DRR/80A / ( V TE P7 PnI _l rT AAA AAnrn OV 12-10-08 SHEET 2 OF 6 J_ m Q Z D Z Q Z O LU oC V) Z O U O w U UL O w J Q O oC O LL O Z O w0000 00000 J CD 0 CL �CLCLm > 0 o� wZwZ z�U� w o 0 0 U J J LJJ (n Q C =0J z z �— �Uz BUJ ~ Z CL w CL J Q U CL V) jj�fp O J Q 0OJ u, Q 0 d Z w w V) 0 0 CL Qc V) w 0 Z O W O Z LO IL EL a L 0 M cd � CJ Ln ( 0 c 0 cd U Q o M o0 J � � Z N O i (V 00 L. O _OCLn" I O w 0 J �p �. t � ,. ,. � � _.., _ _ ... ,.. _. � vas e , . � <# _ as � _. � .. ,_.yam ,.� _ . _ ��.�..,_ - _ _ _. � _ -� .� � _. _ I .,. _. 'ram.=.. 40 0 40 80 .4 J '..; -.,v e : m ,. a _. ..:..,,. .�..�:::. .� ,: 6. a .t. • .c:: .: is # e � ,- c' ._._ .. ery 00 •` .. .... . - ,: : N / Gy F J S00O02 00E 558. � ) F<F ao 'p SO 01 41 E 558.88 R .�:�. , .� z z ssi; '...;tar. ZT,o'ra : t-=<vo t r Two working days before you dig, CALL FOR THE BLUE STAKES 800-782-5348 Blue Stake Center CALL COLLECT vy` NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLAN SEE SHEET 2 FOR PLANT LIST/TABLE SCALE: 1 "=40' SCALES HORZ. VERT. APPROVED BY. TO/pZ/DR131l90A ®AT PZ PROJECT MANAGER OV 12-10-08 I "=40' SHEET 3 OF 6 N/A _J m Q z D V) H z Q Q z O z w U LU W j z O U LL o O ,- W °- U_ 13:f U LL w LL Q O Z 0 W N _J w Q oC > O O Z oC O LL O z ,) 6 O w 1— o — \ Ln C) _o \ Ln C) o \ � C) c. Z W CD J ca CLQ co CL a m 0 00 w Z 3: w Z 6 U _, w � w 2 � 0 0 U CL J J V) L LI 20 zz� �Uz O �zCLo LU J � 0:® Q CLz JI > CL Q � V) W O O0 J CL L C M m r�' cd Ln C QO � N U Q oi) Z ; p 0O O. p =0 Ln I0 w 0 J �p LANDSCAPE PLAN Two working days before you dig, CALL FOR THE BLUE STAKES 800-782-5348 Blue Stake Center CALL COLLECT 0 SCALE: 1 "=40' APPROVED BY" TC/ Z/DRB/BOA l AT PZ PROJECT MANAGER OV 12-10-08 SCALES HORZ. I"=40' SHEET 4 OF 6 VERT. N/A J_ m Q Z D V) H Z Q Q Q Z 0 �. Z > U w W > Z 0 U LL o 0 0 LLJ CL U_ U U LL w LL Q 0 z 0 LU V) _! > J w Q > O 0 Z 0 LL 0 Z 0 0L w i- Q D o - Ln 0 0 Ln 0 0 Ln 0 0 Ln 0 Qm � CL V m CL a IL >• ca 0 Q W Z w Z LU C9 U 112 0 U O J LU Q CL O Z Z Q J 3:Ud- Q U LU Z Q LU J<0 Q CL Z � � Q OJcjr J 00 L r M cd r-., cd Ln cd � Cid N U Q o -j � J � � Z cd N O cV CO L. O =0 LA �o NEW 4' WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK - SEE CIVIL PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION DETAILS Two working days before you dig,", CALL FOR THE BLUE STAKES 800-782-5348 Blue Stake Center CALL COLLECT © OLz LzO - // DETAIL 1 SCALE: 1 "=10' 5 _AG �L AV AG []AV Fill AS(3) DETAIL 3 13 SCALE: 1 "=10' 777 DETAIL 2 SCALE: 1 "=10' S Kir-%Ai I A AIr1C`n A rlC iC'i A nirn DETAIL 4 SCALE: 1 "=10' S SCALES HORZ. I "=10' VERT. N/A �S(3) 3) APPROVED $Y: 7 /pZJDFIP/BOA DATE PZ PROJE(T nnnh,r m OV 12-10-08 SHEET 5 OF 6 m Q Z Z) t) 0 H Z a Q � Z 0 �7 w Q E- ia� LU W _> z 0 U `L o 0 0 w CL _U U U L.L w UL. p 0 Z >.- 0 w N J > J 11' Q � > O 0 Z QC 0 0 Q� Z W Q o Ln 0 0 Ln 0 0 Ln 0 0 Ln 0 J Q � \ Cp d d a_ > m Q W Z W Z Li W L LU I O 11) 0 U 0- J V) J LU C =0� ZQ:;� �U� OU �zLU LU i 0C U QCL0 >Z O J J 00 L C) �Ln c ()0 U Q o cd o J 00 N � Z N O > N aO L. 0 O =0 Ln 0 a Two working days before you dig CALL FOR THE BLUE STAKES 800-782-5348 Blue Stake Center CALL COLLECT m 7777 z Al ,, In co z Q J AS DETAIL 1 SCALE: 1 "=10' 6 } REMOVE EXISTING LANDSCAPE ISLANDS — SEE CIVIL PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. CAP ALL IRRIGATION LINES ENCOUNTERED DURING DEMOLITION REMOVE EXISTING LANDSCAPE ISLANDS — SEE CIVIL PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. CAP ALL IRRIGATION LINES ENCOUNTERED DURING DEMOLITION DETAIL 2 SCALE: 1 "=10' 6 SCALES HORZ. I "=10' VERT. N/A a APPROVF-D Y Y /JR7/DFWl30A DATE PZ PROJECT MA OV 12-10-08 SHEET 6 OF 6 J_ m Q Z LU Z Q Q 0 Z 0 F- W > U rLU LLJ > Z 0 U LL o O F- Lu CL FXE U_ U U LL w LL Q 0 Z 0 W N J > J w Q � > 0 0 Z 0 LL 0 Z U O' 0 F- LU Q Q O Ln O O ul O O Ln O O Ln O � Qm CL m CL 0- > m 0 o0 w Z LU �Ne Z LU C7 U w w 2 J V) J LU C 20� ZQ� �ULU O �zLU LU S/-U Q 0 > QZ O�J cC 0 O V„ U ate-- J W LO :D a. �r a O L 0 lr-� M fd r--� cd Ln C 00 fd U Q o co o0 —i Z cd N O i cV 0 0 0 =0 Ln