The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutOV90903NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TOWN COUNCIL The Town Council invites the community to attend a public hearing on Wednesday, December 2, 2009, 6 p.m. Oro Valley Town Hall, 11000 N. La Canada Dr. Oro Valley, Arizona Public Hearing: OV9-09-03, The WLB Group, representing the property owners, requests approval of an amendment to Ordinance (0) 08-02, a PAD amendment for portions of Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 3. Specifically, the applicant requests an amendment to the deadline contained in Public Works Condition #3 in the Exhibit "A" conditions of approval requiring the extension of Vistoso Village Drive from June 2010 to a date prior to any additional land use on the property that would require the road extension, as determined by the Town Engineer. The meeting will be held in the Town Council Chambers. The public is encouraged to attend and will be invited to speak. An agenda for this meeting will be made available at least 24 hours prior to meeting time and can be viewed at www.orovalleyaz.gov. For questions and additional information, please contact Matt Michels, Senior Planner, at (520) 229-4822 or mmichels(c-orovalleyaz.gov Matt Michels Senior Planner Posted: 11-16-09 Time: 4:45 p.m. By: sg S:\permplus\docs\OV909-003\P_120209 TC Notice.doc NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TOWN COUNCIL The Town Council invites the community to attend a public hearin Wednesday, December 2, 2009, 6 p.m. Oro Valley Town Hall,11000 N. La Canada Dr. Oro Valley, Arizona Public Hearing: OV9-09-03, The WLB Group, representing the property owners, requests approval of an amendment to Ordinance (0) 08-02, a PAD amendment for portions of Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 3. Specifically, the applicant requests an amendment to the deadline contained in Public Works Condition #3 in the Exhibit "A" conditions of approval requiring the extension of Vistoso Village Drive from June 2010 to a date prior to any additional land use on the property that would require the road extension, as determined by the Town Engineer. The meeting will be held in the Town Council Chambers. The public is encouraged to attend and will be invited to speak. An agenda for this meeting will be made available at least 24 hours prior to meeting time and can be viewed at www.orovalleyaz.00v. For questions and additional information, please contact Matt Michels, Senior Planner, at (520) 2294822 or mmichels@orovalleyazToov [8( Matt Michels Senior Planner PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial November 19, 2009 hrov90903 rm 11 k, '� RV Neighborhood 3 m Town Council Page 1 of 22 '�:) G - C - co3 MINUTES ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION December 2, 2009 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 5:00 PM CALL TO ORDER - 5:00 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Paul Loomis, Mayor K.C. Carter, Vice Mayor Bill Garner, Council Member Barry Gillaspie, Council Member Al Kunisch, Council Member Salette Latas, Council Member Vice Mayor Carter attended the Executive Session via telephone. EXECUTIVE SESSION AT OR AFTER 5:00 PM MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Garner and seconded by Council Member Latas to go into Executive Session for the following purpose: In accordance with ARS §38-431.03(A)(1) to discuss personnel matters related to the appointment of a new Town Councilmember to fill one vacancy with term effective until June 2, 2010 MOTION carried, 6-0. MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Garner and seconded by Council Member Kunisch to go out of Executive Session at 5:30 p.m. MOTION carried, 6-0. RESUME REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER - 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=800 02/08/2010 Town Council Page 2 of 22 PRESENT: Paul Loomis, Mayor K.C. Carter, Vice Mayor Bill Garner, Council Member Barry Gillaspie, Council Member Al Kunisch, Council Member Salette Latas, Council Member Council Member Carter attended the Regular Session via telephone. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Loomis led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS Mayor Loomis requested a moment of silence in honor of Town employee Maria Zabaleta who passed away. Communications Administrator Mary Davis reviewed the upcoming meetings and events. COUNCIL REPORTS - No reports. DEPARTMENT REPORTS Communications Administrator Mary Davis reminded the audience of the Town's holiday celebration to be held at Steam Pump Ranch on December 4th and 5th, 2009. Town Clerk Kathryn Cuvelier announced that due to several requests, copies of Town documents would be made available on CDs for a cost of $10.00 (if the record was already available in that specific format). ORDER OF BUSINESS: MAYOR WILL REVIEW THE ORDER OF THE MEETING Mayor Loomis announced that staff has requested that Item 10 be continued. He also moved the Pause for Paws presentation ahead of the Call to Audience. a. PAUSE FOR PAWS Pause for Paws, Lane Davidson from Foundation for Animals in Risk http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=800 02/08/2010 Town Council Page 3 of 22 (FAIR )introduced puppies, Dandy and Daffodil. She stated that they would be available for adoption in a few weeks at a local PetsMart. Ms. Davidson also announced that FAIR was a not for profit organization that sought donations (monetary and/or food) and were in need of foster homes and volunteers. CALL TO AUDIENCE Doug McKee, Oro Valley resident, spoke to the proposed merger of two local fire districts (Northwest Fire District and Golder Ranch Fire District). He stated that there would be a joint meeting at the El Conquistador Resort in the Turquoise Room #1. He urged Oro Valley residents to attend the meeting on Friday, December 4, 2009 at 6:00 p.m. Art Segal, Oro Valley resident, spoke to the proposed merger of two fire departments, Northwest Fire District and Golder Ranch Fire District. He commented that if a consolidation took place, it would be advantageous to the fire districts but not to the residents as it would probably cost more for fire coverage. PRESENTATION: b. PRESENTATION BY COUNCILMEMBER GILLASPIE REGARDING HIS ATTENDANCE AT THE ARIZONA TOWN HALL Council Member Gillaspie reviewed his trip report to the 95th Arizona Town Hall, "Riding the Fiscal Roller Coaster... Government Revenue in Arizona". He outlined the discussions regarding the current State deficit and economic crisis, causes and challenges, and developing a long term strategic plan that would include accountability, defined time tables and assignment of responsibilities. CONSENT AGENDA At the request of Council and staff, Mayor Loomis pulled Items A, J and L for discussion. MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Gillaspie and seconded by Council Member Kunisch to approve the Consent Agenda with the exception of Items A, J and L. MOTION carried, 6-0. A. Minutes - 11-4-09; 11-09-09 (PULLED TO CONTINUE THE MINUTES OF 1114109) http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=800 02/08/2010 Town Council Page 4 of 22 1-1 C A Click here for the 11/04/09 minutes Click here for 11/09/09 minutes MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Latas and seconded by Council Member Kunisch to approve the minutes of November 9, 2009 and to continue the minutes of November 4, 2009 to the January 6, 2010 meeting. MOTION carried, 6-0. Building Safety Monthly Activity Report - October 2009 Click here for Item B Coyote Run Monthly Transit Report - October 2009 Click here for Item C Police Report - October 2009 Click here for Item D E. Metropolitan Tucson Convention and Visitor's Bureau Quarterly Report - July 1, 2009 through September 30, 2009 Click here for Item E F. Informational update on the Pima Association of Governments Regional Transportation Authority PAG/RTA 2010-2015 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) Click here for Item F G. Resolution No. (R)09 - 77 Amending Chapter 16, Section 16-1-7 of the Oro Valley Town Code, by establishing Parks and Recreation Facility Usage Fees Click here for Item G H. Resolution No. (R)09 - 78 Amending the Town of Oro Valley Personnel Policies and Procedures Manual to update Policy 10, Attendance and Leaves http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=800 02/08/2010 Town Council Page 5 of 22 Click here for Item H Resolution No. (R)09 - 79 Authorizing and approving an agreement between the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, Rocking K Holdings, LP and Rincon Valley Holdings, LP for conveyance of unpledged groundwater right extinguishment credits to the Town Click here for Item J. OV12-07-01 B Approval of a one year extension from March 19, 2010 to March 19, 2011 of the development plan/preliminary plat approvals for the Innovation Commerce Campus development, located at the northwest corner of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and Vistoso Commerce Loop (PULLED FOR DISCUSSION) Click here for Item J Discussion followed regarding: - Plans for the property since one interested party was pulling out. - Concerns that the property may be sold. - Looking for high-tech employers Kim Acorn, Acorn Associates Architecture, commented that the economy was bad and plans for the next 2 years were volatile but there were no plans for a change in use. MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Garner and seconded by Council Member Gillaspie to DENY OV12-07-01 B, a one year extension of the development plan/ preliminary plat approvals for the Innovation Commerce Campus development, located at the northwest corner of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and Vistoso Commerce Loop. Further discussion followed regarding: - Unique design of the development was based on a specific company's intent to build on that property. If those development plans have changed, then Council should review the development plan again. - If changes to a development plan/preliminary plat were 25% or greater, then new approvals of development plan/plat were required. - There were no guarantees when a development plan/plat was completed that specific companies would move in. - Questioned whether Council should deny an extension of time for the development of the plat. - Development plan did not regulate the uses other than what was http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=800 02/08/2010 Town Council Page 6 of 22 allowed under the zoning requirements. - The current development plan was grandfathered under the Town's old landscaping codes. New landscaping codes had been adopted including water harvesting which should be applied to a project of this scale. MOTION carried, 4-2 with Mayor Loomis and Council Member Kunisch opposed. K. OV12-06-28B Approval of a two year extension from October 17, 2009 to October 17, 2011 of the development plan/preliminary plat approvals for the Plaza at Vistoso retail/office development on Parcel 5-U of Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 5, located northeast of the intersection of Tangerine Road and Rancho Vistoso Boulevard Click here for Item K L. OV5-09-08 Approval of artwork funding for an art proposal at James D. Kriegh Park located of Calle Concordia (PULLED FOR DISCUSSION) Click here for Item L Discussion followed regarding: - Town Code requirements to install artwork (proposed artwork at James D. Kriegh Park was not required per Code). - Maintenance of artwork projects was the responsibility of the property owner. - Monies in the Town's public art account should be used for maintenance of art projects. - Proposed artwork was a conceptual design at this time pending Council's decision. Mayor Loomis opened the floor for public comment. Zev Cywan, Oro Valley resident and member of the Art Review Commission, commented on art project repairs/maintenance and the Zoning Code's definition of public art. He also addressed the fiscal problems facing the Town and questioned whether the Town should spend monies on such a project at this time. MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Gillaspie and seconded by Council Member Kunisch to deny Item L. MOTION carried, 6-0. http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=800 02/08/2010 Town Council Page 7 of 22 M. Town Council Trip Reports Click here for Item M 2. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING FILLING OF COUNCIL VACANCY WITH TERM EFFECTIVE UNTIL JUNE 2, 2010 Click here for Item 2 MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Gillaspie and seconded by Council Member Latas to appoint Patricia Spoerl effective January 6, 2010 to fill the unexpired term on the Oro Valley Town Council effective until June 2, 2010. MOTION carried, 6-0. 3. TOWN COUNCIL ACCEPTANCE OF THE TOWN'S FINANCIAL AUDIT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 Click here for Item 3 Interim Assistant Town Manager and Finance Director Stacy Lemos reported that the Town had completed the fiscal year 2008/09 audit and a clean audit opinion was issued with no negative findings. Kera Badalamenti, Heinfeld, Meech and Company, P.C. presented an overview of the Town's 2008/09 Comprehensive Audit Financial Report (CAFR). MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Latas and seconded by Council Member Kunisch to accept the Town's financial audit for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. MOTION carried, 6-0. 4. PUBLIC HEARING - LOCAL ALTERNATIVE EXPENDITURE LIMITATION - HOME RULE OPTION Explanation: On November 18, 2009 the Council held the first of two required public hearings regarding the Alternative Expenditure Limitation, commonly referred to as the Home Rule Option. Tonight is the second public hearing. Click here for Item 4 Interim Assistant Town Manager and Finance Director Stacey http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=800 02/08/2010 Town Council Page 8 of 22 Lemos reported that tonight was the second required public hearing on the Alternative Expenditure Limitation (Home Rule Option). She explained that every four years the Town was required to submit this ballot question to the voters to authorize the Town to set its budget limits locally. She stated that the question would be placed on the Spring 2010 ballot and if approved, would allow the Town to spend all revenues received. Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. There being no speakers, the public hearing was closed. RECESS REGULAR SESSION - 7:02 p.m. CONVENE SPECIAL SESSION CALL TO ORDER - 7:02 p.m. RESOLUTION NO. (R)09 - 80 PROPOSING AN EXTENSION OF THE ALTERNATIVE EXPENDITURE LIMITATION - HOME RULE OPTION Explanation: An affirmative vote of two-thirds (2/3) of the Town Council would allow the Home Rule Option to be placed on the March 9, 2010 election ballot. Without voter approval of the Home Rule Option on March 9, 2010, the Town Council would be limited to spending the state -imposed amounts even though revenues and other resources such as cash carryforwards are estimated to exceed the State -imposed amounts. Click here for Special Session Item 1 MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Gillaspie and seconded by Council Member Kunisch to approve Resolution (R)09-80, proposing an extension of the Local Alternative Expenditure Limitation. MOTION carried, 6-0. ADJOURN SPECIAL SESSION - 7:04 p.m. RECONVENE REGULAR SESSION - 7:04 p.m. (ITEM 5 WAS MOVED TO FOLLOW ITEM 7). Click here for Item 5 6. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION NO. (R)08 - 82 OV11- 08-04 REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FOR PORTIONS OF RANCHO VISTOSO, NEIGHBORHOOD 5, GENERALLY BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=800 02/08/2010 Town Council Page 9 of 22 RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD, ON THE EAST BY BIG WASH, ON THE SOUTH BY TANGERINE ROAD, AND ON THE WEST BY THE RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD (Continued from November 4, 2009) Click here for Item 6 Acting Planning and Zoning Director Paul Popelka reviewed the Council Communication and highlighted the following: - Goals of General Plan amendment: - Relocate school site - Maintain existing development rights - Maintain majority of golf course acreage - Widen Honeybee Wash Corridor He then reviewed the existing and proposed General Plan land use maps, land use proposal and the golf course designation. Paul Oland of The WLB Group, represented Vistoso Partners, and reviewed the proposed parcel changes for Rancho Vistoso, Neighborhood 5 General Plan amendment and summarized the following: - Consistent with Town's General Plan goals and policies - Consistent with Amphitheater School District's intentions (Title work has been completed) - No increase to number of housing units (proposed reduction to Neighborhood 5 unit cap from 3,555 to 2,500) - Preserves the intent of the proposed golf course - Parcel 5-D to be designated as Open Space adjacent to Honeybee Park - Significantly widens Honeybee Wash corridor Mr. Oland identified the Town staff condition regarding installation of a sewer line connection up to Parcel B. He commented that Vistoso Partners did not have a problem extending the sewer line up to Sun City; however, they have asked that the requirement for the extension to Parcel B be deleted as they were not involved in the development of that property. Mr. Oland also explained that the Improvement Plan states that the developer of that property would be responsible for connecting to that lift station. Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. Doug McKee, Oro Valley resident, commented that as the Town grows, there would be a need for another golf course. He stated that the proposed amendment retained the intent of the golf course but reduced acreage to a point that may not allow for a golf course to be built in the future. He suggested designating the open area at the north end of the property as an either/or combination of open space and golf course so that there would be http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clii)_id=800 02/08/2010 Town Council Page 10 of 22 the option to place the golf course in the open space. Mayor Loomis closed the public hearing. MOTION: A motion was made by Vice Mayor Carter and seconded by Mayor Loomis to approve Resolution (R)09-82, OV11-08-04, General Plan Amendment for portions of Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 5, generally bounded on the north by Rancho Vistoso Boulevard, on the east by Big Wash, on the south by Tangerine Road, and on the west by Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and subject to the conditions in Exhibit "A". Exhibit "A": Planning and Zoning Conditions 1. The 34.5 acres of HDR (High Density Residential) proposed on Parcel 5-V must be zoned and developed to the Rancho Vistoso PAD MHDR (Medium High Density Residential) density of no more than eight (8) dwelling units per acre (du/ac.). 2. The recreation area adjacent to the old school site (Parcel 5-1) must be improved with sufficient recreational elements and amenities to provide meaningful active and passive recreation opportunities for the community. The park must be constructed to the standards of Section 26.5 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised, or to a standard deemed appropriate by the Oro Valley Parks and Recreation Advisory Board (PRAB). The park plan must be approved by the PRAB. 3. The proposal must provide an adequate corridor of not less than 2,000 feet for recreation trail access and wildlife mobility to the Honey Bee Canyon Park area to the north. This shall be accomplished through the redesignation of Parcel 5-D from Medium Density Residential to Open Space and by moving residential development further west where necessary to maintain the required corridor. 4. As provided in the Escrow Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit "C", within 30 days of approval of this proposed General Plan amendment, Vistoso Partners shall place a special warranty deed for the "Parcel 5-R school site" (as identified in Exhibit "D") into an escrow established for the benefit of the Amphitheater School District for conveyance to Amphitheater School District under the terms and conditions of the attached Escrow Agreement. 5. All future utility lines must be placed underground throughout the amendment area in Neighborhood 5. 6. The overall Neighborhood 5 dwelling unit cap will be limited to 2,500 dwelling units. Oro Valley Water Utility (OVWU) Conditions http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=800 02/08/2010 Town Council Page 11 of 22 1. OVWU will provide water service to the entire development, including the school, for potable and/or reclaimed water and no wells will be drilled by any developers or landowners within Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 5. 2. All new irrigation systems for two (2) or more acres of turf must connect to the Town's reclaimed system per Section 15-15-9(5)(b) of the Town Code. Any addition of new turf to create an aggregate area of more than two (2) acres of turf must extend the reclaimed system to their properties per Section 15-15-9(2)(1)(b) of the Town Code. 3. Provide a minimum 30 foot wide access to OVWU's Well E-2. This access must be in the form of an access/egress easement dedicated to OVWU and when the school site is designed it must allow OVWU 24-hour access to the well site, 7 days a week, 365 days a year. 4. Dedicate to OVWU a 15-foot wide easement in addition to and adjacent to the 15-foot wide easement for the potable main necessary to provide service to the development in the Moore Road/Arrowsmith Loop road. 5. Dedicate to OVWU a 15-foot wide easement from Rancho Vistoso Blvd. on the west to Rancho Vistoso Blvd. on the east along the Moore Road alignment. Oro Vallev Parks and Recreation Conditions 1. The development includes Trail #180, known as the WAPA Line Trail in the Oro Valley Trails Task Force Report. The WAPA Trail traverses most of the center of the Town and provides an important through route for users. The proposed development area also includes Trail #331, which connects both to Trail #180 as well as (eventually) to Trails #33 and #156. Trail #33 (Honey Bee Canyon Trail) is adjacent to the eastern edge of this area. In addition to being noted in the Task Force Report, these trails are listed in the Eastern Pima County Trails Master Plan. Trail #33 is also a State Trail as designated by Arizona State Parks. 2. All three of the aforementioned trails must be identified as "non - motorized public recreation easements" and must be a minimum of 15 feet in width. Pima County Cultural Resources and Historic Preservation Office/Arizona http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=800 02/08/2010 Town Council Page 12 of 22 State Parks, State Historic Preservation Office Condition 1. A new cultural resources survey must be conducted within the subject portions of Neighborhood Five at the time of PAD amendment. This new cultural resources survey would identify the current boundaries of previously recorded archaeological sites AZ BB:9:155(ASM), AZ BB:9:169(ASM), and AZ BB:9:41(ASM). If cultural resources are identified, development and implementation of a mitigation treatment plan prior to ground -disturbing construction [is required]. Public Works Conditions 1. Vistoso Partners will build and complete both Moore and Arrowsmith Roads up to and through their common intersection to the timelines required by the existing agreement with Amphitheater School District, or at the time another development within this amendment area generates the need for the roadway, as determined by the Town Engineer, whichever is required first. This road must consist of a minimum 3-lane collector street section with multi -use lanes, incorporating continuous sidewalk along the west side and a separated 10' wide asphalt pedestrian/multiuse path on the east side. Both the sidewalk and pedestrian multiuse path must completely loop and connect to Rancho Vistoso Boulevard at the north and south intersection points. 2. Vistoso Partners will install a new gravity sewer line from a connection point on Tangerine Road north to the existing lift station serving Sun City Vistoso, Units 9 & 10. In addition, a sewer stub -out shall be provided to the boundary of Parcel 5-13 in order to provide a connection opportunity to relieve the Parcel 5-13 lift station should that HOA elect to construct such a connection in the future. The sewer main connection to the existing Sun City lift station shall be constructed according to the timelines set forth in the existing agreement with the Amphitheater School District or at the time another development within this amendment area generates the need for the sewer, as determined by the Town Engineer, whichever is required first. The location of the sewer line will be along the west bank of Big Wash and will continue by gravity to the closest connection point on Tangerine Road, as dictated by Pima County Wastewater Management. 3. Revise the included Traffic Impact Analysis to correct minor technical deficiencies as directed by the Department of Public Works. http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=800 02/08/2010 Town Council Page 13 of 22 4. Provide a sealed letter by an Arizona Registered Engineer that states that there are no floodways that will affect the areas of this PAD amendment, or revise the report to stipulate that there are none currently mapped and that at the time of development, floodway analysis will be conducted. And any development within floodways shall be subject to the associated development requirements and restrictions. 5. Provide a full hydrology report (said report shall be prepared to the standards of the Town of Oro Valley Drainage Criteria Manual, including engineering data & calculations providing support of statements contained within) sealed by an Arizona Registered Engineer that addresses all of the following information: a. Revise this submittal to provide a qualitative description of existing drainage conditions along the downstream property boundary. b. Exhibit F1 — Revise the exhibit to Describe and map the characteristics of the existing on -site hydrology. Include the following: i. Approximate 100 year floodplains with a discharge greater than or equal to 50 cfs. This map has been delineated down to a 100cfs flow threshold. ii. Peak discharges both entering and leaving the site for 100 year events which exceed 50 cfs using approximate methods such as the regional area versus discharge graphs. This is particularly important for parcels 5-R and 5- V. c. Revise the submittal to Identify if any features of the development (i.e. structures, roads, lots), as shown by the Tentative Development Plan overlay, encroach on and/or modify existing site drainage patterns. Explain why this is necessary and other alternatives that have been considered. d. Revise the submittal to Describe and map potential drainage impacts to off -site land uses both upstream and downstream due to the proposed development. The third paragraph states that a future detailed encroachment analysis will be conducted. This must be provided as a part of the required hydrology report needed for this submittal. Rough encroachment as well as floodway analysis must be provided to determine the extent of the allowable development. The only alternative to the floodway http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view—id=5&clip_id=800 02/08/2010 Town Council Page 14 of 22 information request is to provide a letter as stated in condition 5 above. e. Revise the report to specify that all public streets shall be all- weather passable as specified in the Town of Oro Valley Drainage Criteria Manual, section 6.1 Criteria. Developments consisting of private streets shall provide at least one all-weather vehicular path from each dwelling/building to the public ROW system. This includes the streets identified in the TDP that access each habitable building. 6. Revise the site analysis to address the existing and proposed rights - of -way widths. The report does not account for the ROW width difference between Arrowsmith and Moore roads. 7. Revise the Site Analysis to describe the right-of-way and pavement widths, geometrics, design speeds and traffic control improvements which will be needed. 8. Revise the Site Analysis to describe proposed on -site street right-of- way, indicate their proposed ownership and show typical roadway sections. 9. Revise the Site Analysis, for proposed developments greater than 0.5 miles from elementary schools and greater than 0.8 miles from middle and high schools, to indicate safe bus stops and safe bus turnarounds, if required. Bus stops should be designed to allow residents to monitor the safety of children while at the same time minimizing the impact of waiting children on the adjacent residents. This should be provided as a part of the TDP. Discussion followed regarding: - Maintaining the golf course area as natural open space (Gillaspie) - Developer would have to come back to Council if they wanted to build a golf course in the future (Gillaspie) - Water "budget" for proposed golf course (Mayor Loomis) - (Developer of a new golf course would be required to use reclaimed water resources and add additional reclaimed water lines and install pumps in order to meet the demand for the reclaimed water use.) - Future golf course was promised to residents (Mayor Loomis) - Natural open space is consistent with General Plan policies and as economic conditions change, the plan could be amended (Gillaspie) MOTION carried, 5-1 with Council Member Gillaspie opposed. http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=800 02/08/2010 Town Council Page 15 of 22 Mayor Loomis recessed the meeting at 7:35 p.m. The meeting resumed at 7:45 p.m. 7. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. (0)09-19 OV9-09- 01 AMENDING PORTIONS OF THE PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT FOR PORTIONS OF RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD FIVE, GENERALLY BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD, ON THE EAST BY BIG WASH, ON THE SOUTH BY TANGERINE ROAD, AND ON THE WEST BY RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD (Continued from November 4, 2009) Explanation: The WLB Group on behalf of Vistoso Partners is requesting approval of a Planned Area Development (PAD) amendment. Click here for Item 7 Senior Planner Matt Michels reviewed the Council Communication, existing and proposed land use maps and the tentative development plan. He then highlighted the following: — Town policy provides for conformance between the General Plan and Zoning — Goals of amendment: - Relocate school site - Maintain existing development rights - Maintain majority of Golf course acreage - Widen Honeybee Wash Corridor Mr. Michels stated that staff recommended approval of the Planned Area Development (PAD) amendment with conditions as listed in Exhibit "A". Paul Oland, The WLB Group, representing Vistoso Partners, stated that they are requesting approval of the PAD amendment to be in conformance with the Town's approved General Plan. Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. There being no speakers, the public hearing was closed. MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Gillaspie and seconded by Council Member Kunisch to adopt Ordinance (0)09-19, OV9-09-01, PAD Amendment for portions of Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 5, generally bounded on the north by Rancho Vistoso Boulevard, on the east by the Big Wash, on the south by Tangerine Road and on the west by Rancho Vistoso Boulevard (Site Analysis N-1) and subject to the conditions contained in "Exhibit A". Exhibit "A": http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=800 02/08/2010 Town Council Page 16 of 22 Planning and Zoning Conditions 1. The 34.5 acres of Medium -High Density Residential (MHDR, Parcel 5-V) may be developed to a density of no more than eight (8) dwelling units per acre (du/ac.), with a maximum dwelling unit cap of 275 units. 2. The school site (Parcel 5-R) shall be dedicated to the Amphitheater School District within 30 days of approval of the PAD Amendment. A copy of the recorded Warranty Deed shall be sent to Planning and Zoning to confirm conformance with this condition. 3. The overall dwelling unit cap in Neighborhood 5 will be reduced to 2,500. 4. No occupied structures will be allowed in the Town -adopted riparian area in the eastern portion of Parcel 5-R. The riparian area should remain undeveloped or be utilized for activity fields and related uses only. 5. The golf course designated area must remain undisturbed except as necessary to accommodate utility facilities and access. 6. All future utility lines must be placed underground throughout the amendment area in Neighborhood 5. 7. All new development in the PAD Amendment area will be architecturally consistent with the existing styles and character of the area. Public Works Conditions Vistoso Partners will build and complete both Moore and Arrowsmith Roads up to and through their common intersection to the timelines required by the existing agreement with Amphitheater School District, or at the time another development within this amendment area generates the need for the roadway, as determined by the Town Engineer, whichever is required first. This road must consist of a minimum 3-lane collector street section with multi -use lanes, incorporating continuous sidewalk along the west side and a separated 10' wide asphalt pedestrian/multiuse path on the east side. Both the sidewalk and pedestrian multiuse path must completely loop and connect to Rancho Vistoso Boulevard at the north and south intersection points. 2. Vistoso Partners will install a new gravity sewer line from a connection point on Tangerine Road north to the existing lift station serving Sun City Vistoso, Units 9 & 10. In addition, a sewer stub -out shall be provided to the boundary of Parcel 5-B in order to provide a http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=800 02/08/2010 Town Council Page 17 of 22 connection opportunity to relieve the Parcel 5-13 lift station should that HOA elect to construct such a connection in the future. The sewer main connection to the existing Sun City lift station shall be constructed according to the timelines set forth in the existing agreement with the Amphitheater School District or at the time another development within this amendment area generates the need for the sewer, as determined by the Town Engineer, whichever is required first. The location of the sewer line will be along the west bank of Big Wash and will continue by gravity to the closest connection point on Tangerine Road, as dictated by Pima County Wastewater Management. 3. Revise the included Traffic Impact Analysis to correct minor technical deficiencies as directed by the Department of Public Works. 4. Provide a sealed letter by an Arizona Registered Engineer that states that there are no floodways that will affect the areas of this PAD amendment, or revise the report to stipulate that there are none currently mapped and that at the time of development, floodway analysis will be conducted. And any development within floodways shall be subject to the associated development requirements and restrictions. 5. Provide a full hydrology report (said report shall be prepared to the standards of the Town of Oro Valley Drainage Criteria Manual, including engineering data & calculations providing support of statements contained within) sealed by an Arizona Registered Engineer that addresses all of the following information: a. Revise this submittal to provide a qualitative description of existing drainage conditions along the downstream property boundary. b. Exhibit F1 — Revise the exhibit to Describe and map the characteristics of the existing on -site hydrology. Include the following: i. Approximate 100 year floodplains with a discharge greater than or equal to 50 cfs. This map has been delineated down to a 100cfs flow threshold. ii. Peak discharges both entering and leaving the site for 100 year events which exceed 50 cfs using approximate methods such as the regional area versus discharge graphs. This is particularly important for parcels 5-R and 5- http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=800 02/08/2010 Town Council Page 18 of 22 V. c. Revise the submittal to Identify if any features of the development (i.e. structures, roads, lots), as shown by the Tentative Development Plan overlay, encroach on and/or modify existing site drainage patterns. Explain why this is necessary and other alternatives that have been considered. d. Revise the submittal to Describe and map potential drainage impacts to off -site land uses both upstream and downstream due to the proposed development. The third paragraph states that a future detailed encroachment analysis will be conducted. This must be provided as a part of the required hydrology report needed for this submittal. Rough encroachment as well as floodway analysis must be provided to determine the extent of the allowable development. The only alternative to the floodway information request is to provide a letter as stated in condition 5 above. e. Revise the report to specify that all public streets shall be all- weather passable as specified in the Town of Oro Valley Drainage Criteria Manual, section 6.1 Criteria. Developments consisting of private streets shall provide at least one all-weather vehicular path from each dwelling/building to the public ROW system. This includes the streets identified in the TDP that access each habitable building. 6. Revise the site analysis to address the existing and proposed rights - of -way widths. The report does not account for the ROW width difference between Arrowsmith and Moore roads. 7. Revise the Site Analysis to describe the right-of-way and pavement widths, geometrics, design speeds and traffic control improvements which will be needed. 8. Revise the Site Analysis to describe proposed on -site street right-of- way, indicate their proposed ownership and show typical roadway sections. 9. Revise the Site Analysis, for proposed developments greater than 0.5 miles from elementary schools and greater than 0.8 miles from middle and high schools, to indicate safe bus stops and safe bus turnarounds, if required. Bus stops should be designed to allow residents to monitor the safety of children while at the same time minimizing the impact of waiting children on the adjacent residents. This should be provided as a part of the TDP. http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=800 02/08/2010 Town Council Page 19 of 22 MOTION carried, 6-0. 5. UPDATE AND DISCUSSION OF POTENTIAL TOWN ANNEXATION AREAS (CONTINUED FROM 11/18109) Special Projects Coordinator Scott Nelson reviewed the annexation area study map and highlighted the following: - No current requests for annexation - Focus on three study areas: - Arroyo Grande (State parcels outside of general planning area) - State land parcels to the west of Town (in Marana's general planning area) - Catalina Citrus Estates (30 property owners, commercial and residential and includes Tohono Chul Park) (No action required). 8. PUBLIC HEARING• OV9- - HE WLB GROUP, REPRESENTING THE PROPERTY OWNERS, REQUESTS APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE NO. (0) 08-02, A PAD AMENDMENT FOR PORTIONS OF RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 3. SPECIFICALLY, THE APPLICANT REQUESTS AN AMENDMENT TO THE DEADLINE CONTAINED IN PUBLIC WORKS CONDITION #3 IN THE EXHIBIT "A" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REQUIRING THE EXTENSION OF VISTOSO VILLAGE DRIVE FROM JUNE 2010 TO A DATE PRIOR TO ANY ADDITIONAL LAND USE ON THE PROPERTY THAT WOULD REQUIRE THE ROAD EXTENSION, AS DETERMINED BY THE TOWN ENGINEER Click here for Item 8 Acting Planning and Zoning Director Paul Popelka explained that the property owners requested that a zoning condition that would require that Vistoso Village Drive be extended by June 2010, be amended. Staff suggested that the road extension requirement be removed and that the Town Engineer determine when the road should be extended. Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. There being no speakers, the public hearing was closed. MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Kunisch and seconded by Council Member Garner to approve OV9-09-03, applicant's request for an amendment to Public Works Condition #3 in Ordinance (0)08-02, a PAD amendment for portions of Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 3. (New http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=800 02/08/2010 Town Council Page 20 of 22 condition #3 to read: "Design and construct Vistoso Village Drive to the southern property line of Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 3, Parcel B, at no cost to the Town prior to any additional land use on the property that would require the road extension, as determined by the Town Engineer".) MOTION carried, 6-0. 9. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING PUBLIC TRANSIT SERVICE OPTIONS FOR THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Click here for Item 9 Transit Administrator Aimee Ramsey reviewed current services being performed by Sun Shuttle and Coyote Run. She then presented options for Council's consideration: - Three scenarios: Option A - Leave Coyote Run alone - No service changes to Oro Valley residents - Least amount of savings - Quality and service control Option B - Transform Coyote Run into Sun Run - Town managed, quality control, staff retention, continued utilization of volunteers - General public transportation no longer limited to seniors and ADA - Operation policies set by the Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) - Development of Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) - Seniors travel options change - ADA passengers moved to another provider Option C - Eliminate Coyote Run: RTA to contract Transit Services - RTA managed and operated, service quality unknown, no local control or decision options - General public transportation - Operational policies set by the RTA - Seniors travel options change - ADA and senior passengers moved to another provider - Staff future unknown Ms. Ramsey reviewed the financial impacts for each option and then highlighted outstanding issues as follows: - Fare and revenue sharing - Service operations (operational policies) - Technology integration - Customer services and our residents http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=800 02/08/2010 Town Council Page 21 of 22 - State funds Council discussion followed regarding: specific Sun Shuttle routes, impact to residents, level and quality of services to meet citizen needs, continue to look at options, RTA was not ready to commit to further funding at this time, and look into running Coyote Run as an Enterprise Fund. Jim Degrood, RTA Transportation Services Director, commented that Sun Shuttle Route 402 was disappointing and that they were looking at improvements for the Oracle Road services. He further commented that they were open to investigating what would best serve Oro Valley. Council encouraged further research into options for Coyote Run and asked that staff continue to keep the Council informed. 10. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING ISSUES IDENTIFIED IN THE FINAL REPORT OF THE LIBRARY REVIEW COMMITTEE Click here for Item 10 MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Latas and seconded by Council Member Kunisch to continue Item 10 to the January 6, 2010 Council meeting. MOTION carried, 6-0. 11. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Council Member Kunisch, Seconded by Council Member Latas - Direction to the Town Attorney to look at 1 % for art (Funds possibly be split - half to art and half to cultural resource preservation) Council Member Garner, Seconded by Council Member Kunisch - Direct staff to come back at future Study Session with information on setting Coyote Run as an Enterprise Fund Council Member Kunisch, Seconded by Council Member Garner - Add to Planning and Zoning Work Plan - Ordinance/Code amendment for maintenance/repair of public art CALL TO AUDIENCE - No speakers. ADJOURNMENT http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=800 02/08/2010 Town Council Page 22 of 22 MOTION: A motion was made by Vice Mayor Carter and seconded by Council Member Garner to adjourn at 9:02 p.m. MOTION carried, 6-0. http://orovalley.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=800 02/08/2010 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 8 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION- MEETING DATE: December 2, 2009 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: Paul R. Popelka, RLA/AICP, Acting Planning & Zoning Director SUBJECT: Public Hearing: OV9-09-03, The WLB Group, representing the property owners, requests approval of an amendment to Ordinance (0) 08-02, a PAD amendment for portions of Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 3. Specifically, the applicant requests an amendment to the deadline contained in Public Works Condition #3 in the Exhibit "A" conditions of approval requiring the extension of Vistoso Village Drive from June 2010 to a date prior to any additional land use on the property that would require the road extension, as determined by the Town Engineer. SUMMARY: This request to extend the deadline for design and construction of Vistoso Village Drive is based on current economic conditions and the extended timeframe for development projects, including development on Parcel B, which the Town owns. Approvals to Date: • Town Council approved the Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 3 PAD Amendment on February 6, 2008 DISCUSSION: Current Condition Design and construct Vistoso Village Drive to the southern property line of Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 3, Parcel B, at no cost to the Town by June of 2010. Recommended Condition Design and construct Vistoso Village Drive to the southern property line of Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 3, Parcel B, at no cost to the Town prior to any additional land use on the property that would require the road extension, as determined by the Town Engineer. FISCAL IMPACT: There are no fiscal impacts from this request. CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION: Findings in Favor.- 1 . Current economic conditions have forestalled development of Parcel B and the roadway is not currently necessary. 2. The amended condition maintains the same obligation for the applicant to design and construct the roadway at a date concurrent with the actual need for the roadway. Finding Against: 1. The amended condition is not "date certain" as it is currently written. SUGGESTED MOTION: The Town Council may wish to consider one of the following motions: TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 2 I move to (approve, approve with conditions, OR deny] OV9-09-03, applicant's request for an amendment to Public Works Condition #3 in Ordinance (0) 08-02, a PAD amendment for portions of Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 3. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance (0) 08-02 2. Exhibit "A" Conditions of Approval 3. Innovation Park Tentative Development Plan Project Manager. Matt Michels, Senior Planner cc: Paul Oland, WLB, via e-mail Neil Simon, Venture West, via e-mail VVYJVPA��J �pi>2�OS Pau opelka, i 1 nin & Zoning Director St cey Lemo nterim Assistant Town Manager f � Craig Civalier, rubo orks Director Arne Watson, Interim Town Manager Tobin Rosen, Town Attorney S:\PERMPLUS\DOCS\OV909-003\P-120209 TC REPORT.doc ATTACHMENT 1 ORDINANCE NO. (0) 08- 02 ov9 09 03 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, AMENDING PORTIONS OF THE LAND USE MAP FOR NEIGHBORHOOD THREE OF THE RANCHO VISTOSO PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT GENERALLY BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD, ON THE EAST BY ORACLE ROAD, ON THE SOUTH BY TANGERINE ROAD, AND ON THE WEST BY BIG WASH. WHEREAS, the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development was adopted by the Town Council on July 29, 1987; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has requested that approximately 144 acres of Neighborhood 3 of the Rancho Vistoso PAD be reconfigured as to the land use designation of the parcels contained therein, as shown in Exhibit `B"; and WHEREAS, the Applicant proposes an approximately "one-to-one" exchange of developable land for open space and roadway; and WHEREAS, the net result of this exchange is an increase of 3.6 acres of open space and roadway; and WHEREAS, the Applicant's request for a land use map amendment complies with the Rancho Vistoso PAD and the Oro Valley Zoning Code revised; and WHEREAS, the Applicant's request for a land use map amendment complies with the applicable General Plan requirements; and WHEREAS, on January 4, 2008, the Planning & Zoning Commission recommended approval for the Rancho Vistoso PAD land use map amendment with conditions; and WHEREAS, the Town Council has duly considered the Applicant's request for a land use map amendment of the Rancho Vistoso PAD for portions of Neighborhood Three. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona that the Rancho Vistoso PAD land use map pertaining to those portions of Neighborhood Three generally bound by Rancho Vistoso Boulevard to the north, Oracle Road to the east, Tangerine Road to the south and Big Wash to the west, is hereby amended as shown in Exhibit "B", subject to the conditions contained in Exhibit «A„ F:''O V,OV'NOOT9-0747'Oidivana.d% Tow ufO. Wky Ago)y j Omcdrm0109DO NOW THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that: Section 1. All Oro Valley ordinances, resolutions or motions and parts of ordinances, resolutions or motions of the Council in conflict with the provision of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. Section 2. if any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona on this bth day of February , 2008. ATTEST: Kath yn E. Cuvelier, Town Clerk Date: .?-1 J-0 2 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Paul H. Loormi—s, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Tobin Rosen, Town Attorney Date: L1116r Exhibit "A" is available for public review in the Office of the Oro Valley Town Clerk between the hours of 8:00 AM - 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday. TheTown Hall Offices are located at 11,000 N. La Canada Drive. PUBLISH:. Daily Territorial February 14, 15, 19, 20, 2008 P:W VOV9Q007�9.07.0Toldu;uKadcc Town ororo Vallcy Mranuy9 0McUumolo7o3 ATTACHMENT 2 OV9 o9 03 Exhibit `A' Conditions of Approval, OV9-07-07 NOTE: The following conditions are intended to be integrated into the Rancho Vistoso PAD as additional policies for Neighborhood 3. PART 1: Planning and Zoning and Water Utility Conditions Land Use 1. The following land uses shall be prohibited within C-1 designated areas along Oracle Road: Automobile mechanical repair, Automobile parking lot, Automobile lubrication and oil change operation, Billiard or pool hall, Convenience store per OVZCR Sec. 31.86(d), Gasoline service station, Mechanical and electronic games arcade, Self-service car wash, Tire store, Recreational vehicle storage, funeral chapel or mortuary, and sexually -oriented businesses. 2. Retail development within C-1 designated areas along Oracle Road shall not be "strip center" style (i.e. arranged as an open air center configured in a linear form, where stores sit side -by -side in a long and narrow row of stores). 3. No more than 75,000 square feet of gross floor area permitted per individual retail business within C-1 designated areas along Oracle Road. Expansions beyond 75,000 square feet of gross floor area per individual retail business may only be allowed with a Conditional Use Permit. 4. On -site parking for medical offices shall be provided at the ratio of no more than 5.75 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. 5. Assisted living/skilled nursing/continuum of care facilities shall be permitted on Parcels 3-BB, 3-CC, and within the Innovation Corporate Center. Trails and Connectivity 6. Multi -use trails shall be provided along east bank of Big Wash and through the central recreation area, including trail connections at the north and south ends of Neighborhood 3. The design of the multi -use trails and the central recreation area shall be in substantial conformance with the concepts presented in the Site Analysis document, and shall include pedestrian -oriented features such as seating areas and ramadas. 7. The trail along the Big Wash shall be improved and extended south to Tangerine Road. 8. Pedestrian crossings shall be provided to offer trail connectivity across Vistoso Village Drive. Exhibit `A' Conditions of Approval OV9-07-07 Page 1 of 4 9. The Commercial area shall be designed in a manner that integrates pedestrian connectivity throughout the site and to other adjacent parcels.. Ventana Medical Systems Parcels 10. Natural open space shall be maintained to a depth sufficient to buffer the Parking lot along the east side of Innovation Park Drive as detennined through the development plan review. A visual analysis shall be required to demonstrate adequate visual buffering. Significant Resource Preservation and Sustainability 11. Energy conservation technologies shall be incorporated into the building and site design taking into account current practices, balanced with specific user needs and constraints, as well as economics. Example measures include, but are not limited to: a. Solar orientation of buildings; b. Landscape design to enhance shading of buildings; c. Energy efficient buildings, including lighting, windows, insulation, HVAC systems, alternative energy systems, and plumbing fixtures. 12. Solar powered lighting shall be incorporated into the design of the development based on lighting requirements, safety concerns, economics, aesthetics, and available technology. 13. Rainwater harvesting shall be required in all landscaped areas and rooftop design should integrate rainwater harvesting, based on safety concerns, economics, aesthetics, and available technology. 14. Grading of the ridge -spurs in the entitled areas lying between Innovation Park Drive and Oracle Road with slopes greater than twenty-five (25%) shall be permitted, subject to all slope treatment, native plant preservation plan (NPPP), and revegetation standards required by required by the Zoning Code and Rancho Vistoso PAD. 15. All development plans shall contain a visual analysis of the proposed slope treatments and all slopes shall be revegetated to the greatest extent feasible. All other slope treatment and revegetation standards required by the Zoning Code and Rancho Vistoso PAD shall apply. Architecture 16. Neighborhood 3 shall include a diversity of architectural styles to achieve a diverse yet integrated office park feel and identity for Neighborhood 3, in accordance with the existing Rancho Vistoso Architectural Design Guidelines. Exhibit `A' Conditions of Approval OV9-07-07 Page 2 of 4 Public Utilities 17. All utility lines for new development within Neighborhood 3 shall be placed underground. NOTE: See map in' Section II-G of the Land Use Proposal for clarification of the following descriptions and locations of referenced "Points" 1. The applicant shall dedicate the loop road (as right-of-way) which runs from "Point B" (see attached Exhibit) west from Innovation Way and then North to Rancho Vistoso Boulevard. This right-of-way will be placed along and coincident with the Utility easement which contains both the sewer main and the 16-inch "E" Zone water main from "Point A" to Rancho Vistoso Boulevard. No distribution connections will be allowed or approved off of this main north of "Point A". 2. Any Distribution connections north of "Point A" shall be from the existing "F" Zone mains. 3. The applicant shall construct, at their expense, a 16-inch Ductile Iron "B" Zone water main within this new right -of way from "Point A" to "Point B". This new water main shall connect to the existing 16-inch "E" Zone main in the eastern Right -of -Way of Innovation Way at "Point B". 4. The Applicant shall appropriately abandon the replaced 16-inch "B" Zone water main from "Point A" to "Point C". PART II: Public Works Conditions of Approval 1. Design and constrict all on -site and off -site public improvements at no cost to the Town. This includes all street signalization and street improvements for all infrastructure required for development of this region. This also includes any right-of- way acquisition required to reconfigure the internal street system to meet the layout of the Tentative Development Plan. 2. Provide a revised master Traffic Impact Analysis for Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 3 before the first formal Development Plan submittal of any of the PAD amendment affected areas. This also includes updating the signal warrant analysis for all internal and external street intersections. This report shall also address the following: • Access management implementation Any impacts to the present and future Town of Oro Valley Municipal Operations Facility (MOC) Exhibit `A' Conditions of Approval OV9-07-07 Page 3 of 4 Excluded from this requirement are Ventana Medical Systems and Venture West parcels R, S, T, U & V. These entities are required to submit separate individual T1A's at time of development if determined by the Town Engineer. 3. Design and construct Vistoso Village Drive to the southern property line of Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 3, Parcel B, at no cost to the Town by June of 2010. 4. Provide a revised master Preliminary Hydrology report for Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 3 before the first formal Development Plan submittal of any of the PAD amendment affected areas. This report shall conform to the latest revisions of the Town of Oro Valley Drainage Criteria Manual and Floodplain Ordinance. This report shall also address the following: The status and adjustment of the approved FEMA conditional letter of map revision (CLOMR). Any affects from the Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 2 - Cottonwood Properties in -line retention. Excluded from this requirement are Ventana Medical Systems and Venture West parcels R, S, T, U & V. These entities are required to submit separate individual drainage reports at time of development if determined by the Town Engineer. 5. ADOT approval of the Site Analysis and Conceptual Tentative Development Plan is required for this project. )exhibit `A' Conditions of Approval OV9-07-07 Page 4 of r�3 ' d-t'#1��si yi # ♦x �*n r ,+"N ga .^d, dr. r a a a"/ ��! r 11 PP g' .e ,f R7 y GF §F �s i�Y e jj,a° 1r"'t a Ir �i ,�'%�r i x,,`" p� sEiJ "sE.�`,r"'f �O g ( t •� ,� t " a 9 r 4 x p i` x ay t •, r �° c,( s 'a x eri'srxa w3 7'�*� x v4d a» S.y d �� 4 rg eT'g!b .m i'. ' .refs='� i�ro syb) r' s,r^,t,'*� a, =i2 Lr '` 4' • k I t» 1 J 'i s ti W€y t• " '8 "xP f } u of E tF Ya ♦ *t 9 ,rr,d �: yk r Y "` ti �� .,SANOFI a 1 s,, i fi y a r ff AVENTIS tt.r, •�., sr }erg t- ORO VALLEY ll MUNICIPAL r r COMPLEX�..aa x.3-.izr�'N'."ly �,t�*a r�2•;�. a �� VENTANA '� MEDICAL � ,1#�Y,� SYSTEMS CH VA R t"rt'�/,r. r 3�,.s. ,# .. S`�'c, � �' (Y a N{ L r t r E ^ x P s141 ..F. ,`�' Z K o a • #• i ' , t� >.. }Fyrt� � { r�r tE�5y z rt rt k+. y F r WlS ,'}ate Z",• 'a' .� ,✓ s fr 'S 't L''xr, �qra-f'�F�� '9 .�,, ,,, y 3"�.t ( I pl#p E� tZVI ' s #+�, t +•r�' r"' e '*g�r� % '� Y`ry. x*,��'�.t r r x4 p bi tit�� ka �? eEC a�fw k .f °cq". Q + rta�F SP.' i t'✓r 4 x '�� 1 i� �'7'�,�.,'fs : i6S,/—�' "`•t �, 'S "+ t �ti F}i�<#a0 Ak� ��!'•+ rMK � 'a��• ��t k r �t i j i i . x Y�.*�h '... O� ,�„ s �'�r� �t'`'� jjyys�..,Zr•". o � i`"' x t- r ' n w'. � � r i is vol, INNOYATIONCORPORATECENTER�2 ;�� ^•' s �'� FUTURE 'Ft"+r,..,�',",` a be*a ta° r t HOSPITAL �s."[�"� yr kc F EXPANSION. LU < #4y d N ,VV,,�i-e,,�k.1 ''�} .� � •* it x M��h*w P' � r L �� : � �z� � "� ORO VALLEYpq �a" a. r z 4;t� t HOSPITAL ..F v T r l € „rtil HOTELi-x,t '#' rc XtY x yd; TA' NGERINE"RPA. D ORO VALLEY MARKETPLACE 2 ntari�@r ays r� (UNDER CONSTRUCTION)�, .ram} 4 C- 'r�, �v ae.l�. PA P K VENTURE WEST zx�.iev ® 0' 300' 600' The Oro Valley, Arizona w.w-.,rra-rfs.��1.....w:..,...�,..,v»w w,....�...u+.v OV9..0 ■ ....,, ... - ATTACHMENT 3 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT 11000 N La Canada Drive, Oro Valley, AZ 85737 (520) 229-4800 — Fax (520) 742-1022 December 4, 2009 Paul Oland The WLB Group 4444 Broadway Blvd. RE: OV9-09-03, The WLB Group, representing the property owners, requests approval of an amendment to Ordinance (0) 08-02, a PAD amendment for portions of Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 3. Dear Paul: At their regular meeting of December 2, 2009, the Town Council voted unanimously (6-0) to extend the deadline for design and construction of Vistoso Village Drive contained in the Public Works Condition #3 in Ordinance 08-02, as follows: Design and construct Vistoso Village Drive to the southern property line of Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 3, Parcel B, at no cost to the Town prior to any additional land use on the property that would require the road extension, as determined by the Town Engineer. Please contact me if you have any questions. Respectfully, Matt Michels Senior Planner cc: Neil Simon, Venture West Shirley Gay, OV Development Coordinator Paul Keesler, OV Public Works File S:\PERMPLUS\DOCS\OV909-003\PZ—TC ACTION 12-02-09.doc