Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOV120504SITE ANALYSIS AND TENTATIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN CHAPALA 3 ACRES GEORGE 3 ACRES Property Owners: Chapala Partners, LLC 2251 West Tortolita Sunrise Place Tucson, Arizona 85742 Joe and Rosemary George 1191 West Moore Road Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 Oro Valley Case #OV9-05-04 March 31, 2005 Revised July 7, 2005 Revised August 17, 2005 WLB No. 105013-A-001 For clarification of material contained in this report, contact: Gustav Paul Oland, Project Manager THE WLB GROUP, INC. 4444 East Broadway Boulevard Tucson, Arizona 85711 (520) 881-7480 LA105013\Submittal 20050817 Council\ Thp- Gr ..,WM B TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction............................................................................................................1 A. Existing Land Uses....................................................................................1 1. Site Location..................................................................................1 2. Existing Land Uses — Onsite..........................................................1 3. Existing Adjacent Land Uses ......................................................... 4 4. Well Sites.......................................................................................4 B. Topography................................................................................................6 1. Topographic Characteristics.......................................................... 6 2. Average Cross Slope..................................................................... 6 C. Hydrology...................................................................................................8 1. Offsite Watersheds........................................................................ 8 2. Offsite Natural or Man -Made Features .......................................... 8 3. 100-Year Discharges Greater Than 100 cfs.................................. 8 4. Onsite Hydrology........................................................................... 8 D. Vegetation.................................................................................................8 E. Wildlife..................................................................................................... 10 F. Viewsheds...............................................................................................10 G. Recreation and Trails...............................................................................11 I. Cultural / Archaeological / Historic Resources.........................................11 J-K. Utilities.....................................................................................................11 1. Sewers.........................................................................................11 2. Water 3. Dry Utilities...................................................................................11 L. Schools....................................................................................................11 EXHIBITS Al. Location Map............................................................................................. 2 A2. Aerial Photograph...................................................................................... 3 A3. Surrounding Architectural Styles............................................................... 5 B. Topography................................................................................................7 C. Typical Vegetation..................................................................................... 9 M. Composite Map........................................................................................12 APPENDICES Appendix A ............................................... Tentative Development Plan (24" x 36") Appendix B............................................... Tentative Development Plan (11" x 17") Appendix C.......................................................Cover Sheets of Surrounding Plats Appendix D..............................................Arizona Game & Fish Department Letter Appendix E............................................................... Arizona State Museum Letter Appendix F...................................................... Amphitheater School District Letter Appendix G..............................:......................... U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Letter Site Analysis and Tentative Development Plan Chapala 3 Acres & George 3 Acres WLB No. 105013-A-001 August 17, 2005 ii I INTRODUCTION This site analysis and Tentative Development Plan are being prepared in support of two rezoning proposals: approximately 3.3 acres for Chapala Partners, LLC and approximately 3.3 acres for Joe and Rosemary George. Based on recommendations from Town staff, cooperation between Chapala and the Georges is highly encouraged throughout the rezoning process as well as during the construction phase. To this end, the two have signed a Cooperation Agreement. Chapala Partners wishes to split their property into three one -acre lots for the purpose of building custom single-family residences. The Georges wish to split approximately one acre from the southern portion of their property for sale to a homeowner in the vicinity who intends to construct a home for a family member. Per an agreement with Bob Conant, Planner ll, and due to the fact that the proposals are both simplistic in scope and small in land area, this site analysis does not cover all areas specified in Section 3-104 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised. Rather, it focuses on the most pertinent physical issues as they relate to development of the subject property. A. Existing Land Uses 1. Site Location The subject properties consist of approximately 3.3 acres each located within the Town of Oro Valley in Section 35, Township 11 South, Range 13 East, Pima County, Arizona. To the west of the properties is La Canada Drive, which is currently under construction. Once complete, La Canada Drive will serve as an arterial connection between Moore Road to the north and Tangerine Road to the south. Refer to Exhibit Al for a location map of the subject property, and to Exhibit A2 for an aerial photograph of the subject property. 2. Existing Land Uses - Onsite The Chapala Partners property is currently undeveloped and vacant. The George residence exists in the northern portion of their property and is visible in Exhibit A2. Site Analysis and Tentative Development Plan Chapala 3 Acres & George 3 Acres WLB No. 105013-A-001 August 17, 2005 EXHIBIT A2 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH CHAPALA 3 & GEORGE 3 A PORTION OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, G.&S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA WLDBUVU3D Group 08.17.2005 WLB No. 105013-A-001 3. Existing Adjacent Land Uses The subject property is surrounded by the following existing zonings and land uses: a/b. North R1-20 (Vistoso Highlands subdivision) ' East R1-144 (One residence) East Beyond R1-20 (Moonridge subdivision) South R1-20 & R1-36 (Tangerine Heights subdivision) LR1-36 (Vistoso Gateway subdivision) West R1-144 (Vacant) Vacant land exists across La Canada Drive. To the north is the Vistoso Highlands subdivision featuring an average lot size of 28,514 square feet. South of the properties is the Tangerine Heights subdivision with an average lot size of 26,270 square feet. To the southwest is the Vistoso Gateway subdivision with an average lot size of 36,626 square feet. To the east are two 5-acre parcels on which a single house exists. Beyond this residence is the Moonridge subdivision with an average lot size of 26,626 square feet. The cover sheets of the nearby plats are included as Appendix C The current Town of Oro Valley General Plan designates all of the surrounding property are LDR-2.0 with the exception of the ten acres adjacent to the east, which is designated as LDR-1.2. The Town of Oro Valley General Plan Update 2020 current draft does not propose to change these designations from how they are shown in the existing plan. C. There are both one story and two story structures within one -quarter mile of the subject property. d/e. There are no pending or conditionally approved rezonings within one - quarter mile of the subject property. Several approved subdivisions exist within one -quarter mile of the subject properties, as described above in Section 3-a/b. g. Refer to Exhibit A3 for examples of architectural styles within one -quarter mile of the subject property. 4. Well Sites There are no wells within 100 feet of the subject properties. Site Analysis and Tentative Development Plan 4 Chapala 3 Acres & George 3 Acres M-Mas WLB No. 105013-A-001 August 17, 2005 A. : • ar.. T � y GEORGE BOUNDARY { Xs EXHIBIT A3 SURROUNDING ARCHITECTURAL STYLES CHAPALA 3 & GEORGE 3 A PORTION OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, 1"=300' G.&S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA The WLB D WLB No. 1050013-A-0015 Group B. Topography 1. Topographic Characteristics The subject properties are located along a shallow ridge sloping gradually from a high point in the north to a low point in the south. Elevations range from 2844' to 2852' on the Chapala property and from 2836' to 2848' on the George property. There are neither areas of slope greater than 15 percent, nor any rock outcrops on the properties. Exhibit B shows the topography of the subject properties. 2. Pre -Development Average Cross Slope This figure was derived using the formula as set forth by the Hillside Development Zone, Section 10-110 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised. The average cross slopes were calculated as follows: Chapala Partners Property (1)(L)(0.0023) = (2')(2,542')(0.0023) = 3.54 % A 3.3 ac. George Property (1)(L)(0.0023) = (2')(2,203')(0.0023) = 3.07 % A 3.3 ac. Site Analysis and Tentative Development Plan 6 Chapala 3 Acres & George 3 Acres MX" WLB No. 105013-A-001 August 17, 2005 EXHIBIT B 2' TOPOGRAPHY CHAPALA 3 & GEORGE 3 A PORTION OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, 1 "=100' G.&S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA The Group ` AVU3D 08.17.2005 WLB No. 105013-A-001 C. Hydrology 1. Offsite Watersheds Offsite drainage impacts the subject properties at one location along the northern property line. At this point, as shown on the Tentative Development Plan, approximately 34 cfs enters the site from the Vistoso Highlands subdivision to the north. A wash having a flow of approximately 460 cfs flows north -south through the property adjacent to the east of the subject property. 2. Offsite Natural or Man -Made Features The construction of La Canada Drive has altered flows in the area. A new CMP has been installed beneath the access drive off La Canada to the subject properties. All flows, from both on -site and off -site, exit the subject property via shallow sheet flow. 3. 100-Year Discharges Greater Than 100 cfs There are no areas with 100-year discharges greater than 100 cfs on the subject properties. 4. Onsite Hydrology The onsite drainage generally is conveyed in a southerly direction as shallow sheet flow draining at a slope of 3 to 4 percent. The contours of the land are generally parallel with minimal channelization of the flow. There are no onsite drainage facilities. The subject properties are located within FEMA Zone X: Areas determined to be outside 500-year floodplain. There are no federally mapped floodways or floodplains within one -quarter mile of this site. D. Vegetation The subject properties have moderate vegetative densities and are characteristic of the Sonoran desertscrub Palo Verde / Mixed Cacti community. One significant saguaro and several dozen mature Palo Verdes, Mesquites and Acacias exist on site. Numerous barrel and Cholla cactus are also present on the subject properties. Utmost care will be taken to preserve and transplant viable plants since they are integral to the genus loci of the property. Vegetative density is evident in Exhibit AZ Aerial Photograph. Exhibit C shows typical vegetation on site. Site Analysis and Tentative Development Plan 8 Chapala 3 Acres & George 3 Acres W " WLB No. 105013-A-001 August 17, 2005 E. Wildlife Preliminary analysis indicates a low probability for the presence of any threatened or endangered species on site. The edge of a xeroriparian area crosses through the eastern edge of the Chapala Partners property, as shown on the Tentative Development Plan. No disturbance is planned in this area. No aquatic ecosystems exist on site. A site file check was requested of the Arizona Game and Fish Department for review and comment on the potential for high densities of a given species' population or an unusually high diversity of species on the subject properties. In their response letter, included as Appendix D of this report, AZGFD staff did not express a high level of concern about the proposed development. According to the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the Sonoran Desert Conservation Plan Priority Vulnerable Species lists, there are two State listed threatened and endangered species potentially having habitat on the subject property. These species are the Cactus ferruginous pygmy owl (Glaucidium brasilianum cactorum) and the Rufous -winged sparrow (Aimophila carpalis). The Rufous -winged sparrow has a medium potential for habitat on the subject property. The subject property is outside the USFWS November 27, 2002 proposed critical habitat for the Cactus ferruginous pygmy owl, although the entire community is within the proposed recovery area. A site file check has been requested of the USFWS. In their response letter, included as Appendix G of this report, USFWS staff did not express a high level of concern about the proposed development. F. Viewsheds 1. Distant views of the Catalina Mountains to the east and the Tortolita Mountains to the northwest are visible from the subject properties and across the properties from adjacent parcels. Affects on these views by the proposed four residences will be minimal, if any, due to the relatively large size of adjacent lots. 2. Both properties are fairly visible from offsite areas, especially from the west along La Canada Drive. The eastern portion of the Chapala property is less visible because it is on the far side of the shallow ridge that runs north -south through the properties. H. Trails The Glover Road Trail (#325) alignment runs north -south approximately 700 feet west of the subject properties. It will be intended for hiking, bicycling and equestrian use. The Oro Valley Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan designates a planned shared use path along La Canada between Tangerine Road and Moore Road. 2. As identified in the "Eastern Pima County Trails System Master Plan", there are no proposed trail rights -of -way located onsite. Site Analysis and Tentative Development Plan 10 Chapala 3 Acres & George 3 Acres WLB No. 105013-A-001 August 17, 2005 1. Cultural / Archaeological / Historic Resources A brief field survey indicates a low probability for the presence of any archaeological resources on site. A letter and conceptual site plan were submitted to the Arizona State Museum for review and comment on the potential for such resources on the subject properties. In their response letter, included as Appendix E of this report, AZSM staff did not reveal the existence of any known sites or express a high level of concern about the proposed development. J-K. Utilities Sewer A new manhole has recently been constructed along the western boundary of the Chapala Partners property as part of the Vistoso Highlands development. Preliminary discussion with Pima County Wastewater Management indicates that capacity exists and that this manhole is a suitable connection point. The location of the sewer line is shown on the Tentative Development Plan. 2. Water For its potable and irrigation water needs, the subject property will connect into the 12" line located within the Vistoso Highlands development, as shown on the Tentative Development Plan. Chapala Partners will coordinate with the Vistoso Highlands Homeowners Association and Oro Valley Water to design and construct this connection. 3. Dry Utilities The following companies are expected to provide dry utility service to the subject property: Phone: Electric: Gas: Cable: Solid Waste Disposal: L. Schools Qwest Tucson Electric Power Southwest Gas Comcast Waste Management 1. The site is located in the Amphitheater School District. Copper Creek Elementary is located approximately one mile south of the site. Painted Sky Elementary is located approximately 1.2 miles east of the site. Although the anticipated impact on local schools is minimal, the District has been contacted regarding the proposed construction. Their response letter mentions an acceptable voluntary contribution agreement that will be finalized prior to construction. The District's letter is included as Appendix F. Site Analysis and Tentative Development Plan 11 Chapala 3 Acres & George 3 Acres WLB No. 105013-A-001 August 17, 2005 EXHIBIT M COMPOSITE MAP C.HAPALA 3 & GEORGE 3 A PORTION OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, 1"=100' G.&S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA The Group D 08.17.2005 WLB No. 105013-A-001 Appendix A Tentative Development Plan (24" x 36") Site Analysis and Tentative Development Plan 1 Chapala 3 Acres & George 3 AcresB WLB No. 105013-A-001 July 7, 2005 GENERAL NOTES: A. GROSS AREA OF THE PROPERTY TO BE REZONED IS 6.6 ACRES. B. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED R1-144. THIS PROPOSED AMENDMENT IS TO CHANGE THE DESIGNATION TO R1-36 WHILE MAINTAINING THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE. C. PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IS 0.76 DWELLING UNITS PER GROSS ACRE. D. PROPOSED NUMBER OF NEW RESIDENTIAL UNITS IS 4. TOTAL: 5. E. BUILDING HEIGHT IS A MAXIMUM OF 18 FEET. F. AMOUNT OF UNDISTURBED OPEN SPACE IS UNKNOWN, ALTHOUGH A MAXIMUM OF 20% IS TARGETED. FOLLOWING A SUCCESSFUL REZONING, HOUSE PLANS WILL BE DESIGNED, ALLOWING A MORE ACCURATE ASSESSMENT OF OPEN SPACE PRESERVATION. G. WATER SERVICE PROVIDER IS ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY. H. MINIMUM LOT SIZE: 36,000 SQUARE FEET. TYPICAL LOT SIZE: 1 ACRE. I. SETBACKS FRONT: 30 FEET. REAR: 15 FEET. SIDE: 40 FEET. J. OFF-STREET PARKING: THIS PROJECT PROVIDES FOR A MINIMUM OF TWO PARKING SPACES INSIDE THE GARAGES ASSOCIATED WITH EACH RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNIT. THE FRONT SETBACKS ALLOW FOR AT LEAST TWO VEHICLES TO BE PARKED IN THE DRIVEWAY WITHOUT PROTRUDING INTO THE SIDEWALK. AS SUCH, NO VISITOR PARKING AREAS OTHER THAN THE DRIVEWAYS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED. K. ALL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS ARE TO BE SITE -BUILT UTILIZING WOOD FRAME CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES. THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT IS 18 FEET. L. ALL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS ARE TO BE LOCATED ON THE LOTS AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN AND ARE TO CONFORM TO THE SETBACKS AS SPECIFIED HEREIN. M. LANDSCAPE MATERIAL USED IN THIS PROJECT IS AS PERMITED BY THE "ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES LOW WATER USE/DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANT LIST FOR THE TUCSON ACTIVE MANAGEMENT AREA." N. ONCE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS, ITS IS ANTICIPATED THAT HOME CONSTRUCTION WILL BE COMPLETED WITHIN APPROXIMATELY TWO YEARS. 0. NEW LOT ADDRESSES WILL BE ASSIGNED BY PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING AT THE TIME OF LOT SPLIT FOLLOWING REZONING. P.C. ADDRESSING HAS INDICATED THAT "LA CANADA DRIVE" ADDRESSES ARE LIKELY TO BE ASSIGNED RATHER THAN THE "MOORE ROAD" ADDRESSES THAT CURRENTLY EXIST IN THE AREA. P. A TYPE I GRADING PLAN WILL BE REQUIRED FOR EACH LOT. Q. THE ACCESS DRIVE SHOWN ON THIS PLAN IS FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE PROJECT AND DOES NOT MEET THE STANDARDS REQUIRED TO BE CONSIDERED TO BE A PUBLIC STREET. MIA 8' 12" 10' 10' 12" 8' ff 2 W 2 1zi o y - -- 38' PRIVATE DRIVE - --� .x11 GREEN PEBBLE DRIVE qq� I r 2945.s x < �a FIRST AX(ERICAN TRUST FI HYDRANT - L LOCAIIdI •_"��%*-- - - — r - _. R(RESS GRFSS EASOEIIT ,: - 3�_EIiC= , TAKE +28n') a e _ a,.�^ ,, ,I / T Ek1ST EEC, POLE BE RE110VED 30' /E >r \ \\\ \ I. J -849 — 'cP06PA? [ ! IA �< r 1.00 AC. I PAD ELEV. t284J i \' n - L BAPAIA e % T i00 T 1 / I % 1. AC.. 1 P ze d3�3 I Je zl L xz�sn r �' PM 'ELE� t2849' 493 j A 2�C 13 94CHAPALA \ ��. _ LOT 2 z� G,� ,, C. PAD ELEV.A±2849� i i /` ez ` 41 c6<4 1x2A45.7 0n4 I• 7 £ 1 op CHAPALA B LTN I. 0 DARY x.ea �< I } ! GEORGE i LOT 1 2e4 3 2.25 AC./ x 2e42 8 KNOTT/GEORGE 2643�— � '.. GEORGE I\ BOUNDARY 6 9- k GEORGE LOT 2 1.08 AC. A 6. ® 0' 60' 120' 1 SO' PROPERTY OWNERS PROJECT PLANNERS & ENGINEERS Chapala Partners, LLC Joe & Rosemary George The WLB Group, Inc. 2251 West Tortolita Sunrise Place 1191 West Moore Road 4444 East Broadway Boulevard Tucson, AZ 85742 Oro Valley, AZ 85737 Tucson, Arizona 85 y1 1 602.625.5907 520.742.6971 520.881.7480 ® LOCATION MAP BONG A PORTION OF SECTION 35 T. 11 S. R. 13 E. G.&S.R.M. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA 3'= 1 MILE I Cr-r-Nln EXISTING 5' CONTOUR EXISTING 1' CONTOUR EXISTING PAVEMENT AND CURB —w—�— EXISTING WATERLINE AND VALVE —s—f� EXISTING SEWER LINE AND MANHOLE —.—=— NEW WATERLINE AND VALVE —h•0 NEW SEWER LINE AND MANHOLE --- PROPERTY BOUNDARY s NEW FIRE HYDRANT --- -- EASEMENT LINE O DRAINAGE CONCENTRATION POINT _ LOW XERORIPARIAN AREAS 100-YEAR FLOOD LIMITS NONE ON THIS SITE dVROCK OUTCROPS NONE ON THIS SITE SLOPES >25%60� NON NONE ON THIS SITE CHAPALA 3 & GEORGE 3 TENTATIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 35, T-11-S, R-13-E, G. & S.R.M TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY ARIZONA PHOTO DATE = 2005 SCALE: 1"=60' CONTOUR INTERVAL: 1' WLB JOB NO. 105013-A-001 06.14.2005 1 OF Bx.,6B PG.�v APPROVALS I, KATHRYN CWELIER, CLERK OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS APPROVED BY THE MAYQQR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ON THEM_ DAY OF A�LLL__, 2004 CLER , TOWN OF ORO VALLEY DATE 4!)/a¢- PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MAN MENT GATE TOWN \ENGINEER DATE ZO OMINISTRATOR OA E CERTIFICATION OF WATER ADEQUACY A CERTIFICATION OF ASSURED WATER SUPPLY HAS BEEN RECEIVED FROM THE DIRECTOR OF WATER RESOURCES. BY•-- 7 S !0 O WATER UTILITY D1RE� DAtE ASSURANCES ASSURANCE IN THE FORM OF A THIRD PARTY TRUST AGREEMENT, TRUST NO. FROM FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, AS RECORDED IN DOCKET LZ'ik PAGE _1!iC HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO GUARANTEE DRAINAGE AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS (INCLUDING MONUMENTS) AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS (ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, GAS, SEWER, WATER) IN THIS SUBOMSION. By -r 1 UATE ASSURANCES IN THE FORM OF BOND, FROM ----- ------------ IN THE AMOUNT OF ---------, HAVE BEEN PROVIDED TO GUARANTEE THE RESEEDING OF THIS SUBDIVISION IN THE EVENT THE PROJECT IS ABANDONED. NO FINAL INSPECTION FOR ANY LOT WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHALL BE APPROVED UNTIL A BUILDING CODES OFFICIAL HAS VERIFIED THAT CONSTRUCTION ON THE LOT IS COMPLETE AND SIDEWALKS HAVE BEEN INSTALLED, PROPERTY LINE TO PROPERTY LINE. aaSy� \O^ RECORDING DATA o IAA STATE OF ARIZONA) SS N0. POOV09300.40 COUNTY OF PIMA )j FEE THIS INSTRUMENT WAS FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF CASTRO ENGINEERING CORPORATION ON THIS J114 DAY OF _ Y -__, 2004 ATQ;;91M., IN BOOK 1. OF MAPS AND PLATS AT PAGE _Y, _ THEREOF. F. ANN RODRIGUEZ ������ PIMA COUNTY RECORDER ��COUNTY RECORDER RECORDER CERTIFICATION OF SURVEY 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE BOUNDARY SURVEY SHOWN ON THIS PLAT WAS PERFORMED UNDER MY DIRECTION AND THAT ALL EXISTING AND/OR PROPOSED SURVEY MONUMENTS AND MARKER SHOWN ARE CORRECTLY DESCRIBED. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS PARED UN R A DIRECTION. 17139 FRANK O. BY Q CASTRO FRANK G. CASTRO, R.L.S. °s , ARIZONA REGISTRATION NO. 17139 '' t CERTIFICATION OF ENGINEER I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FLOOD PRONE LIMITS AND/OR EROSION HAZARD SETBACKS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION. y � AC128 4 ROC:RICK ►. BY 4 LAKE p RODERICK F. LANE, P.E. ?•mw, ARIZONA REGISTRATION NO. 40226 DEDICATION WE, THE UNDERSIGNED. HEREBY WARRANT THAT WE ARE ALL AND THE ONLY PARTIES HAVING ANY RECORD TITLE INTEREST IN THE LAND SHOWN ON THIS PLAT AND WE CONSENT TO THE SUBDIVISION OF SAID LAND IN THE MANNER SHOWN HEREON. WE HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE PUBLIC ALL RIGHTS -OF -WAY SHOWN HEREON, INCLUDING ALL STREETS, EASEMENTS (DRAINAGEWAYS, ALLEYS). UTILITY EASEMENTS AS SHOWN HEREON ARE DEDICATED FOR THE PURPOSES OF ACCESS, INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF UTILITIES AND PUBLIC SEWERS. EXCLUSIVE EASEMENTS FOR TOWN USES AS SHOWN HEREON ARE HEREBY DEDICATED TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY. WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, OUR SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, DO HEREBY SAVE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, THEIR EMPLOYEES, OFFICERS, AND AGENTS HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES RELATED TO THE USE OF SAID LANDS NOW AND IN THE FUTURE BY REASON OF FLOODING, FLOWAGE, EROSION, OR DAMAGE CAUSED BY WATER, WHETHER SURFACE, FLOOD. OR RAINFALL. IT IS FURTHER UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED THAT NATURAL DRAINAGE SHALL NOT BE ALTERED, DISTURBED OR OBSTRUCTED WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL. PRIVATE DRAINAGEWAYS, PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS, AND COMMON AREAS, AS SHOWN HEREON, ARE RESERVED FOR THE PRIVATE USE AND CONVENIENCE OF ALL OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN THIS SUBDMSION, THEIR GUESTS AND INVITEES, AND (EXCEPT FOR DRAINAGEWAYS) AND ARE GRANTED AS EASEMENTS TO PIMA COUNTY AND ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR ACCESS, INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND PUBLIC SEWERS. TITLE TO THE LAND OF ALL PRIVATE DRAINAGEWAYS AND COMMON AREAS SHALL BE VESTED IN AN ASSOCIATION OF INDIVIDUAL LOT OWNERS AS ESTAB(.ISHED BY OVENANTS. CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS IN DOCKET BOOKl23kn 1 PACE 1 IN THE OFFICE OF THE PIMA COUNTY RECORDER. EACH AND EVERY LOT OWNER WITHIX THE SUBDIVISION SHALL BE A MEMBER OF THE ASSOCIATION, WHICH WILL ACCEPT ALL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CONTROL, MAINTENANCE, SAFETY AND LIABILITY OF THE PRIVATE DRAINAGEWAYS AND COMMON AREAS WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION. AS SHOWN HEREON. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION UNDER TRUST NO. 9035, AS TRUSTEE ONLY AND NOT IN ITS CORPORATE CAPACITY AND NOT PERSONALLY BY. � y TRUST KAI HABER, AS TRUSTEE OF KAI HABER TRUST AGREEMENT, UNDER AGREEMENT DATED OCTOBER 9, 2002. \k b .. , f-., of 7-011 KAI HABER, TRUSTEE DATE BENEFICIARY OF TRUST THE BENEFICIARY OF FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, TRUST NO. 9035: SCOTIA JOINT VENTURE L.L.P., AN ARIZONA LIMITED LABILITY PARTNERSHIP 3573 E. SUNRISE, SUITE 209 TUCSON. AZ 85718 ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF ARIZONA ) } SS couNtY of PIMA ) ON THIS THE 6 DAY OF Ji¢�l�,, ,200.4r BEFORE M THE UNDERSIGNED P RSONALLY APPEARED L'1DP17�L� 1_�Q!�iCe. WHO ACKNOWLEDGED SELF TO BE THE TRUST OFFICER OF FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE CO., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION AND THAT SUCH OFFICER BEING AUTHORIZED SO TO 00, EXECUTED THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT FOR THE PURPOSE THEREIN CONTAINED, BY SIGNING THE NAME OF THE CORPORATION AS TRUSTEE. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I HEREUNTO SET MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. n ' 11JAL ornuAi SE AL u CINDY A REICME I I NOTAII7 ►YalK: 11R¢OMA NOTARY P BLIC CoJhi) p bbd' C XPIRES STATE OF ARIZONA ) } SS COUNTY OF PIMA ) THE F DINGy� T� UMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS-9-I/x' OF N MR. 3' BY KAI HABER. AS TRUSTEE OF KAI HABER TRUST AGREEMENT, NO£R AGREE DATED OCTOBER 9, 2002. T Y PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES �'' � ri�r rAlcs,ntn{ GENERAL NOTES 1. THE GROSS AREA OF THIS SUBDIVISION IS 56.77 ACRES. 2. TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS IS 68. J. NATURAL OPEN SPACE (RIPARIAN HABITAT) - 9.47 ACRES. COMMON AREA "A' (PARK/RECREATION AREA) = 1.35 ACRES. COMMON AREA 'C" (OPEN SPACE) = 1.52 ACRES. COMMON AREA 'B" (DRAINAGE) = 1.49 ACRES. R.O.W. ALONG LA CANADA DRIVE TO BE DEDICATED TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY BY THIS PLAT - 2.21 ACRES. NET BUILDABLE AREA - 29.75 ACRES. 4. TOTAL MILES OF NEW PUBLIC STREETS IS 1.0 MILES. 5. THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE IS 20.000 S.F. PER R1-20 ZONING. 6. THE AVERAGE LOT SIZE IS 26,270 S.F. 7. THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT PERMITTED IS 18 FEET AND NOT TO EXCEED 2 STORIES. 8. BUILDING SETBACKS: FRONT = 30 FEET. SIDE = 15 FEET REAR 30 FEET 9. PARKING PROVISIONS: REQUIRED: 68 X 2.5 (FOR 4 BEDROOM/MORE UNIT) - 170 SPACES GUEST PARKING (► SPACE PER 4 UNITS) - 68/4 17 SPACES TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED = 187 SPACES. PROVIDED: 68 X 4 (2 CAR GARAGE + 2 SPACES DRIVEWAY) 272 SPACES 10. THE CONDITIONAL ZONING IS R1-20 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT). PROJECT DENSITY. 1.18 RAC It. NO FURTHER SUBDIVISION OF ANY LOT OR PARCEL SHOWN WILL BE DONE WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL. 12. THE AREA BETWEEN 100 YEAR FLOOD LIMITS REPRESENTS AN AREA THAT MAY BE SUBJECT TO FLOODING FROM A 100 YEAR FREQUENCY FLOOD AND ALL LAND IN THIS AREA WILL BE RESTRICTED TO USES THAT ARE COMPATIBLE WITH FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT AS APPROVED BY THE TOWN ENGINEER. 13. THE BASIS OF BEARING FOR THIS PROJECT IS THE EAST -WEST MIO- SECTION LINE OF THE WEST 1/2 OF SECTION 35 AS PER THE PLAT OF TANGERINE HEIGHTS, LOTS 1 THRU 80 AND COMMON AREA 'A" AS RECORDED IN BOOK 52 OF MAPS do PLATS AT PAGE 28. PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA. SAID BEARING BEING N89'48.48-E. 14. THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL SUBMIT AS -BUILT RECORD DRAWINGS AND CERTIFY IN WRITING THAT ALL IMPROVEMENTS, WHETHER PRIVATE OR PUBLIC, HAVE BEEN CONSTRUCTED, PLACED, INSTALLED, ETC. IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE ACCEPTED PLANS FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT. CERTIFICATIONS IN WRITING AND THE AS -BUILT RECORD DRAWINGS ARE TO BE RECEIVED BY THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY A MINIMUM OF TWO (2) WEEK S PRIOR TO THE REQUEST FOR CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY AND/OR FINAL INSPECTION BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND THE RELEASE OF ASSURANCES, EXCEPT FOR MODEL HOMES INTENDED TO BE USED FOR SALES PURPOSES. IF THE PROJECT IS PHASED THE ABOVE PERTAINS TO EACH PHASE 15. THE PROPERTY OWNER, HIS SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNS OR A DESIGNATED HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION AGREES TO 1) KEEP ALL REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS MAINTAINED IN A WEED FREE, TRASH FREE CONDITION, 2) REPLACE ANY DEAD PLANT MATERIALS WITHIN 90 DAYS AND 3) MAINTAIN THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IN PROPER WORKING ORDER. i 16. NO LANDSCAPING OR IMPROVEMENTS ARE TO CONSTRUCTED BETWEEN 30" TO 72" IN HEIGHTS ABOVE ADJACENT CURB WITHIN ALL SITE VISIBILITY TRIANGLES. 17. THE AREA TO BE PRESERVED SHALL INCLUDE THE AREA OF 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN AND VEGETATION IN THE MAIN WASH AND ITS TRIBUTARY. A CONSERVATION EASEMENT WILL BE OVERLAID ON ALL RIPARIAN HABITAT AREAS. NO GRADING OR ENCROACHMENT WILL BE ALLOWED WITHIN THESE AREAS. 18. THE RIPARIAN AREAS SHALL BE FENCED OFF AND PROTECTED FROM DISTURBANCE DURING CONSTRUCTION, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RIPARIAN HABITAT ORDINANCE. 19. WROUGHT IRON FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG THE RIPARIAN APRON WITH CATES FOR ACCESS TO THE WASH FROM COMMON AREAS FOR PROTECTION, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. ©0 ALL LOTS WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION WILL REQUIRE AN INOMOUAL GRADING PERMIT ISSUED BY THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY. ANY LOTS WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION WHICH REQUIRE EROSION HAZARD PROTECTION TO ACCOMMODATE THE HABITABLE STRUCTURE ON THAT LOT WILL BE ADDRESSED DURING THE TYPE 1 GRADING PERMIT PROCESS. 21. AN APPLICATION FOR FLOODPLAIN USE PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ANY LOT WHERE ENCROACHMENT INTO FLOODPLAIN LIMITS IS PROPOSED. THE APPLICATION WILL BE EVALUATED AS PART OF THE TYPE 1 GRADING PERMIT. 22. LOTS 9, 14 AND 15 SHALL HAVE CONSTRUCTED PRIVATE DRIVES AT A MINIMUM 30-FEET IN WIDTH WITH A MINIMUM OF 20-FEET OF PAVEMENT WITH "Y' TURN AROUNOS. THESE PRIVATE DRIVES SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE SERVING LOT OWNERS. THE OWNERSHIP AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PRIVATE DRIVES SHALL BE ADDRESSED IN THE PROJECTS CC&R'S. 23. DISCLOSURE STATEMENT WILL BE GIVEN TO ALL HOME BUYERS TO NOTIFY THAT ALL LOTS ARE CONTAINED WITHIN THE FLIGHT PATH FOR LA CHOLLA AIR PARK. ensue. s•/7s YNwe. 08 2 25 35 35 36 /IW 33163 Svw COr.MI7 ;• ' M6Ua. 51172 I 4a133 w Aa I use I • ,",/ •e/as LOCATION MAP SECTION 35. T- I I -S, R-13-E G&SRM, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA SCALE: 3' - 1 MILE LEGEND P.U.E. PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT, PEDESTRIAN MAINTENANCE k SIGNAGE EASEMENTS R.O.W. R/W RIGHT-OF-WAY FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT (AS NOTED) A SURVEY MONUMENT TO BE SET (9 CALCULATED POINT L 1 LINE NUMBER Cl CURVE NUMBER FPi 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN LINE NUMBER EH1 EROSION HAZARD SETBACK LINE NUMBER CE1 CONSERVATION EASEMENT LINE NUMBER DEt DRAINAGE EASEMENT LINE NUMBER 1" ,._ _-• PRE & POST 100 YR. FLOOD PLAIN LINE -- EHSL- _ ffi.St EROSION HAZARD SETBACK LINE - - - - - - CONSERVATION EASEMENT LINE - - - - - - - - - EASEMENT LINE LOT ACCESS BCSM BRASS DISK SET IN CONCRETE MKD MARKED FNO FOUND GLO GENERAL LAND OFFICE ACP ALUMINUM CAP AFFIXED TO A REBAR LCP LEAD CAP AFFIXED TO A PIPE I.P. IRON PIN (REBAR) TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PROJ$: OV 12-03-02 11045 ZONE:SEE NOTES Adm. Address: W MOORE RD FINAL PLAT VISTOSO HIGHLANDS LOTS 1 THRU 68, COMMON AREAS "A" (PARK), "B" (DRAINAGE) AND "C" (OPEN SPACE) A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF EAST 1/2 OF NORTHWEST 114 OF SECTION 35. T-II-S. R-13-E, CaSRM, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA SCALEX-40' (TYPICAL) I it f stp Engteednq,, , OV12-03-02 QV9-D2-D9 3680 WEST INA ROAD SUITE 200 TUCSON. AM ONA 85741 (820)293-2560 (620)293-2116 (f-) NOVEMBER 2003 CASTRO JOB No. AFS001 SHEET I OF 12 Wt 115 :WIITN AG ASSURANCE ASSURANCE IN THE FORM OF A THIRD PARTY TRUST AGREEMENT, TRUST No. 49A FIRST AMMAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY. AS RECORDED IN BOOK ZaWAGF Zi - HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO GUARANTEE DRAINAGE AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS (INCLUDING MONUMENTS) AND UTRJTY IMPROVEMENTS (ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE. GAS, SEWER WATER) IN THIS SUBDIVISION. BY �G.Y� DATE a ASSURANCE IN THE FORM OF A CERTIFIED CHECK FROM TANGERINE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP TO THE TOWN OF VALLEY IN THE AMOUNT OF ZLit[,mLaa HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO GUARANTEE THE RESEEDING OF THIS SUBDIVISION IN THE EVENT THE PROJECT IS ABANDONED. APPROVALS G �w+ e. C. uVG(fey - CLERK OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS APPROVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY. ARIZCNA. ON THE /5th DAY OF ���C� .Lao �, TOWN OF ORO YALIEY DATE 1 a PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENTOPARPMENT DATE DIN ,TOWN �F ORO VALLEY GATE - G90 ZONI�/ NISI ATOR.-TOWN OF ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY D� TOWN OF ORO VALLEY D D WATER ADEQUACY A CERTIFICATION OF ASSURED WATER SUPPLY HAS BEEN RECEIVED FROM THE DIRECTOR OF WATER%%RESOURCES. Lu'.. - 0, Y'^-^�-74 41 Z A J WATER UTILITY DIRECTOR, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY D TE CERTIFICATION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY AS SHOWN HEREIN WAS PERFORMED UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT ALL EXISTING MONUMENTS ARE AS DESCRIBED HEREIN. arwrE d29881 b STEPHEN W MCLAIN Jaah� STEPHEN W. McLAIN REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR R.LS, 29881 1 CERTIFY THAT ON THIS PLAT THE 100-YEAR FLOOD PRONE LIMITS AND EROSION SETBACK LIMITS WERE REVIEWED AND SHOWN UNDER MY SUPERVISION AND THAT THE LOT CALCULATIONS WERE PERFORMED UNDER MY DIRECTION. , 11 t JOHN AUSTIN EVANS AusnN EVAN PROFESSIONA ENGNMR 14t ! 7 P.E. NUMBER 11577 L •TC11r RECORDING STATE OF ARIZONA ) ��Oc NO. A003/1S00St COUNTY OF PIMA FEE iv("/oo ) 'FAIZON� THIS INSTRUMENT WAS FILED FOR RECORD AT THE REQUEST OF JOHN A EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC., ON THIS THE /44A DAY OF -VNC 20 02_. IN BOOK SL OF MAPS AND PLATS, AT PAGE 35' THEREOF. F. ANN RODRIGUEZ PIMA COUNTY RECORDER / u...Z.,A•t.�i BY: t DEPUTY FOR PIMA COUNTY RECORDER GENERAL NOTES 1. THE GROSS AREA OF THIS SUBDIVISION IS 5&48 ACRES. 2. THE EXISTING ZONING IS R1-36. 3. THE NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL LOTS IS 50. PROJECT DENSITY IS 0.93 DU/AC. 4. COMMON AREA 'A' (PRIVATE STREETS & PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT) - 5.03 ACRES. COMMON AREA 'B- DRAINAGE FACILITIES, OPEN SPACE k P.U.E.) - 1.50 ACRES COMMON AREA 'C' DRAINAGE FACILITIES, OPEN SPACE & P.U.E - 0.64 ACRES. COMMON AREA 'D' OPEN SPACE) - 0.63 ACRES COMMON AREA 'E' EMERGENCY ACCESS, PUBIC UTILITY EASEMENT & PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT FOR LOT 50) - 0.12 ACRES RECREATION AREA CALCULATIONS COMMON AREA '8' : GROSS AREA 65,304 SF.-2%795 S.F. %DET/FP - 36,509 S.F. COMMON AREA 'C' : CROSS AREA 27.697 S F.-11,842 S.F. %DET/FP - 15.855 S.F. COMMON AREA 'D' : CROSS AREA 16,ID5 S.F.- 6,420 S.F. %DET/FP - 9,685 S.F. TOTAL RECREATION AREA 62,049 S.F. REQUIRED BY CODE 25.624 S.F. OIFFERENCE/PEIWT 38,425 S.F./242% 5. TOTAL MILES OF NEW PRIVATE STREETS IS 0.50 MILES. 6. TOTAL MILES OF NEW PUBLIC STREETS IS 0.0 MILES. 7. THE DEVELOPER WALL PAVE ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE STREETS N ACCORDANCE WITH ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION PLANS. & MINIMUM LOT SIZE FOR LOTS 1-4, 6, 7, 10, 11, 15-19 t 30-50 IS 36,000 SQUARE FEET. 9. MINIMUM LOT SIZE FOR LOTS 5, 8, 9, 12-14 Ak 20-29 IS 2&800 SQUARE FEET. 10. AVERAGE LOT SIZE IS 36,926 SQUARE FEET. 11. THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT IS 18 FEET, 12. BUILDING SETBACK PROVISIONS: FRONT = 15 FT. T. REAR = 40 FT.DUE THESII,.00 TS HAVE TA REDUCED FRONT YARDEASSETBACK MENT AT TOF 0 . (ER OK HE R�All OF S12 25 P32 THOUGH 557 D- 09/29/03) MAY 13. PARKING PROVISIONS: GARAGE 0 2 EACH - 100 DRIVEWAY* 2 EACH - 100 RECREATION - 8 TOTAL PARKING - 208 14. NO FURTHER SUBDIVISION OF ANY LOT OR PARCEL SHOWN WILL BE DONE WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY. 15. THE AREA BETWEEN 100-YEAR FLOOD LIMITS REPRESENTS AN AREA THAT MAY BE SUBJECT TO FLOODING FROM A 100-YEAR FREQUENCY FLOOD AND ALL LAND IN THIS AREA WILL BE RESTRICTED TO USES THAT ARE COMPATIBLE WITH FLOOD PLAN MANAGEMENT AS APPROVED BY THE TOWN ENGINEER. 16. THE BASIS OF BEARINGS: THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 35, T-11-S, R-13-E, G.36.R.B., SAID FARING BEING N.897S35-E., NAD 83/92 CRID. 17. THE BASIS OF ELEVATION: USGS BRASS CAP SURVEY MONUMENT -6 MDC', LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 250'f EAST OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THIS SUBDIVISION. ELEVATION BEING 2802.28, DATUM IS NAVD 88. i& THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL CERTIFY, IN WRITING, THAT ALL IMPROVEMENTS, WHETHER PRIVATE OR PUBLIC, HAVE BEEN CONSTRUCTED, PLACED, INSTALLED, ETC. IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE ACCEPTED PLANS FOR THS DEVELOPMENT. CERTIFICATIONS, IN WRITING, ARE TO BE RECEIVED BY THE TOWN ENGINEER PRIOR TO THE REQUEST FOR FINAL INSPECTION AND THE RELEASE OF ASSURANCES 19. A 1/2- IRON ROD TAGGED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR WALL BE SET AT ALL LOT CORNERS UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. 20. THE PROPERTY OWNER, HIS SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNS OR A DESIGNATED HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION AGREES TO 1) KEEP ALL REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS MAINTAINED IN A WEED FREE, TRASH FREE CONDITION, 2) REPLACE ANY DEAD PLANT MATERIALS WITHIN 90 DAYS AND 3) MAINTAIN THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IN PROPER WORKING ORDER• 21. THE NATURAL OPEN SPACE ON LOTS 32 THROUGH 50 IS TO REMAIN IN AN UNDISTURBED NATURAL CONDITION WWTH NO WALLS OR IMPROVEMENTS OF ANY KIND EXCEPT AS PERMITTED FOR FLOOD CONTROL OR DRAINAGE. 22. NO FINAL INSPECTION FOR ANY LOT WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION SHALL BE APPROVED UNTIL A BUILDING CODES OFFICIAL HAS VERIFIED THAT CONSTRUCTION ON THE LOT IS COMPLETE AND SIDEWALKS HAVE BEEN INSTALLED, PROPERTY LINE TO PROPERTY LINE. 23. OTS 1 THROUGH 31 SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM OF 18,000 SQUARE FEET OF GRADABLE AREA PER LOT. LOTS 32 THROUGH 50 SHALL HAVE A 12,000 SQUARE FEET MAXIMUM GRADING ENVELOPE (EXCLUDING DRIVEWAY). 24. LOTS 32 THROUGH 50 SHALL HAVE A PERMANENT FENCE OR OTHER ACCEPTABLE BARRIER, SUBJECT TO DESIGN APPROVAL BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, WITH NO OPENINGS INTO THE WASH TO PROTECT THE RIPARIAN HABITAT FROM ENCROACHMENT. 25. ALL PROSPECTIVE BUYERS OF LOTS WITHIN VISTOSO GATEWAY SHALL BE INFORMED OF THE PRESENCE AND ACTIVITY OF THE LA CHOlL1 AIRPARK, A PRIVATE AIRPORT LOCATED ABOUT HALF A MILE NORTHWEST OF THE PROJECT. ( CONTINUED ON SHEET 2 ) DEDICATION WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, HEREBY WARRANT THAT WE ARE ALL AND THE ONLY PARTIES HAVING ANY RECORD TITLE INTEREST IN THE LAND SHOWN ON THIS PLAT, AND WE CONSENT TO THE SUBDIVISION OF SAID LAND IN THE MANNER SHOWN HEREON. WE HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE PUBLIC ALL RIGHTS -OF -WAY AS SHOWN ON HEREON, INCLUDING ALL EASEMENTS. UTILITY EASEMENTS AS SHOWN HEREON ARE DEDICATED FOR THE PURPOSE OF INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF UTILITIES AND PUBLIC SEWERS WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, OUR SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, DO HEREBY SAVE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ITS SUCCESSORS. ASSIGNS, THEIR EMPLOYEES, OFFICERS AND AGENTS HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES RELATED TO THE USE OF SAID LANDS NOW AND IN THE FUTURE BY REASONS OF FLOODING, FLOWAGE, EROSION OR DAMAGE CAUSED BY WATER. SURFACE, FLOOD OR RAINFALL IT IS FURTHER UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED THAT NATURAL DRAINAGE SHALL NOT BE ALTERED, DISTURBED OR OBSTRUCTED WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL COMMON AREAS 'A' THROUGH 'E- AS SHOWN HEREON ARE RESERVED FOR THE PRIVATE USE AND CONVENIENCE OF ALL OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION, THEIR GUESTS AND INVITEES, AND ARE GRANTED AS AN EASEMENT TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY. PIMA COUNTY, AND ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF ABOVE GROUND AND UNDERGROUND PUBLIC UTILITIES, PUBLIC SEWERS, AND PRIVATE ROADS, TITLE TO THE LAND OF ALL DRAINAGEWAYS. SLOPE EASEMENTS, DRAINAGE EASEMENTS AND COMMON AREAS AS SHOWN HEREON, SHALL BE VESTED IN AN ASSOCIATION OF LOT OWNERS AS ESTABLISHED BY COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS RECORDED IN DOCKET /.70M AT PAGE -IS- N THE OFFICE OF THE PUMA COUNTY RECORDER. EACH AND EVERY LOT OWNER WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHALL BE A MEMBER OF THE ASSOCIATION, WHICH WILL ACCEPT ALL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CONTROL., MAINTENANCE, SAFETY AND LIABILITY OF THE PRIVATE DRANAGEWAYS, PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS AND COMMON AREAS WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION. AS SHOWIi HEREON. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSUR COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, AS TRUSTEE UNOE�i ST 4 38 AND NOT OTHER BY / TRUST OFFICER STATE OF ARIZONA ) COUNTY OF PIMA ) CN,JHIS t� DAY OF 2003, BEFORE ME, PERSONALLY APPEARED r �t rniPLM �8�WHO ACKNOWLEDGED HERSELF TO BE THE TRUST OFFICER OF FIRST AM CAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST No. 4938 ONLY AND NOT OTHERWISE AND BEING AUTHORIZED TO DO SO, EXECUTED THE FOREGOING INSIRUMEN FOR THE PURPOSE THEREIN. MY �. - NOTARY FfUPUC • PURSUARt �9EC710N 33-4II1 AIRS THE NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE BENt}1GARY AS DISCLOSED BY THE RECORDER OF SAID TRUST ARE AS FOLLOWS: SCOTIA JOINT VENTURE, LLP. AN ARIZONA LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP 3573 E SUNRISE, 1209 TUCSON. ARIZONA 85718 ATTN: MR. PETER ARANOFF ITOWN OF ORO VALLEY PROJ#: OV 1 2-02-01 ZONE: R 1 -36 iAdm. Address: 112135 N REFLECTION RIDGE DR J `A Jebn Evans il Araorates 9180 Fast P/aeia Senns TInzon, Arizona $5749 Consulting Engineers (520) 749-3138 JAE Job No. 01036.1 THIS PROJ LOCATION MAP PORTION SECTION 35. T-11-S., R-13-E TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA SCALE: 3' - 1 MILE LEGEND ■ SET 2' BRASS DISC SURVEY MONUMENT IN CONCRETE STAMPED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. • FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT AS NOTED. • SET 1//2- IRON PIN, TAGGED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. 0 SET 1/2- REBAR. TAGGED RLS 29881 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE L3 LINE NUMBER - SEE LINE DATA TABLE C3 CURVE NUMBER - SEE CURVE DATA TABLE (R) RADIAL BEARING 15 LOT NUMBER LOT ACCESS SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY PROPERTY LINE / RIGHT-OF-WAY - - - - - - - - EASEMENT - - - - FLOCIDPLAIN - • - • - EROSION HAZARD SETBACK NATURAL OPEN SPACE CONSERVATION EASEMENT 40' REAR YARD SETBACK I I L-15' SKX YARD-J SETBACK 30' FRONT YARD I SETBACK 1 -------J MWVATION r r 1 I 1 I I-- I W SIDE YARD -+-I 1 SETBACK I I I 1 20' FRONT YARD I I FSETBACK 1 L -----J TYPICAL BUILDING SETBACK LAYOUT FINAL PLAT vi-gto-qo Gqtpwqy LOTS 1 THROUGH 50 AND COMMON AREAS "A" THROUGH "E" PORTION OF SECTION 35, T-11-S, R-13-E, G.&S.R.M. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA SCALE: 1'-50' MAY, 2003 OV9-00-04 OV 12-02-01 SHEET 1 OF 6 TannZ, P. -AFn A 1" V AK AL� .. BOOK SZ PAGE 28 GENERAL NOTES 1 GROSS SUBDMSINN AREA It 78.49 ACRES 2 TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS = 80 LOT LOT LOT LOT 3 AREA OF COMMON AREA 'A' = 0.71 ACRES AREA OF NATURAL OPEN SPACE (N.O.S.) = 14.45 ACRES. 4 TOTAL MILES OF NEW PUBLIC STREETS = 1.35 g 5 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS Rt- 0 R1-36 MINIMUM LOT AREA = T3bT75T S0.. MAXIMUM LOT AREA - 36.830 S F. 55,073 S.F. AVERAGE LOT AREA - 22.375 S F. 38.746 S F. 6 MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT - 18 FEET, TWO(2) STORIES DETAIL A 7 SETBACKS RI -20 Ri-36 FRONT 30, 30' REAR 30' 40' SIDE 15' 15' 8 PARKING PROVISIONS GRI 68 67 23 22 66 24 / 21 DRY 2 H1 EACH 160 69 65 _ TOTAL PARKING 320 9 EXISTING ZONING - LOTS 1 THRU 50=CONDiTiONA1 Ri-20. LOTS 51 THRU 804ONDITIONAL R1-36 10 NO FURTHER SUBDIVISION OF ANY LOT OR PARCEL SHOWN Wall BE DONE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN r— 25 20 70 APPROVAL Of THE ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL ' 64 11 THE AREA BETWEEN 100 YEAR FLOOD LIMITS REPRESENTS AN AREA THAT MAY BE SUBJECT TO 30 26 FLOODING FROM A 100 YEAR FREQUENCY FLOOD AND ALL (AND IN THIS AREA WILL BE RESTRICTED 29 27 i 19 TO USES THAT ARE COMPATIBLE WITH FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT AS APPROVED BE THE TOWN ENGINEFR' I 62 �$ 63 12 BASIS OF BEARINGS SOUTH LINE OF THE S.W 1/4 OF SECTION 35, BEARING BEING N89.40'27'E. 13 BASIS OF ELEVATION BENCHMARK APPROXIMATELY 1246' EAST Of THE SOUTHWEST 71 CORNER OF SECTION 35 PANEL POINT 4011. PK NAIL AND ALUMINUM TAG IN PAVEMENT ! 28 17 ELEVATION BEING 279146 FEET. 14 THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL CERTIFY, W WRITING, THAT ALL IMPRINSTALLED. ETC. INETHER SUBSTANTIALECONFORBMANCE WITH HAVE ACCEPTED IMPROVEMENTEM4 72 61 32 33 16 4 PLANS FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT. CERTIFICATIONS, IN WRITNG, ARE TO BE RECEIVED BY THE TOWN ENGINEER OF THE TOWN Of ORO VALLEY PRIOR 10 THE 3 15 REQUEST FOR FINAL INSPECTION AND THE RELEASE OF ASSURANCES. 73 60 34 15 A 1/1' IRON PIN TAGGED BY AN R.L.S. WILL BE SET AT ALL LOT CORNERS UPON 14 COMPLETION Of CONSTRUCTION 59 _ 35 16 ALL STREETS ARE PUBLIC. I 17 THE SOILS ENGINEER OF RECORD OR OTHER REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER 74 58 36 13 VIM EXPERTISE IN THE AREA OF SOILS ENGINEERING SHALL CERTIFY, IN WRITING, THAT 1 Z ALL SOILS OPERATIONS FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT WERE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 37 THE RECOMMENDATIONS AS SET FORTH IN THE SOILS REPORT, PREPARED BY WESTERN TECHNOLOA3DENDUM/AMENDMENiS MADE2TH THERETO. CERTIFICATION. IN WRITING, S 10 BE RECEIVED , BATED SEPTEMBER 161996. AND ANY ED 57 38 11 "`"" BY THE TOWN ENGINEER OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PRIOR TO THE REQUEST FOR ANY 75 39 BUILDING PERM'iTS AND/OR FINAL INSPECTION AND THE RELEASE OF ASSURANCES. 40 10 I& THE SOILS ENGINEER OF RECORD OR OTHER REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER WITALLHMATERALSEIN THE AREA OF UTIIZfO ON IHb DDEEVELLOPMENTEAREGSHALL N CONFORMTANCELWITHITHE THAT 76 56 41 ACCEPTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS CERTIFICATIONS, IN WRITING, ARE TO BE REQUESTRECEIVEOR FINAL INSPECTIONS N ENGINEER OF THE TOWN OF ORO S ECTIONS AND THE RELEASE 0 ASSURANCESLD OR TO THE 55 54 42 9 19. ANY UTILITIES THAT MAY NEED TO BE RELOCATED AS A RESULT OF THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL BE MOVED AT NO EXPENSE TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY OR PIMA COUNTY 43 8 S 20 THEPROPOSED OF ORO VALLEY TITER WATER UTILITY. WILL SERVICE THIS SUBDIVISION IS THE TOWN 3 77 \ 44 7 2 21 NO IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN 30 AND 72 INCHES IN HEIGHT RELATIVE TO THE ADJACENT 2 53 ROADWAYS WHICH M.GHT INTERFERE WITH THE PURPOSE AND INTENT OF THE S,Ghl 6 VISIBILITY iRANCLE SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHIN THE SIGHT VISIBILITY EASEMENT. 4S 22. NO DISTURBANCE TO THE 100-YEAR FLOODPIAJN, OTHER THAN FOR ROADWAY AND DRIVEWAY 78 ' 5 CROSSINGS AND UTILITY INSTALLATION SHALL BE PERMITTED UNDER THIS PLAT WITHOUT THE 52 _ 46 APPROVAL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY " 47 4 23 ON -SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PUBLIC AND WILL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED TO PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARDS, 79 24 UNLESS NOTED, PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE ALWAYS PARALLEL WITH THE LOT LINE 48 3 IF THE LOT LINE IS NOT PERPENDICULAR TO THE RIGHT OF WAY LINE THE MINIMUM 51 EASEMENT (SEEHDETAAIL A)STU.NLESSSLINEFNOTED. EASEMENTSTHE EASEMENTLARE CENTERED ONALWAYS BEOLOTOLINES��LD 80 49 2 25, EITHER OR BOTH ACCESS POINTS TO TANGERINE ROAD MAY BE RESTRICTED TO RIGHT- 50 IN OR RIGHT -OUT --____ _---- 26 SELF *POSED SETBACKS WILL BE IMPLEMENTED ON LOTS 2 AND 25 AS NDICAiED ON THIS PUT 27 FOR MULTIPLE FRONTAGE LOTS, A 20 FOOT YARD SETBACK MUST BE MAINTAINED ADJACENT L ___---- — —.—_—_---___ TO ANY PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET. THE TOWN ENGINEER. PLANNING AND ZONING DIRECTOR+''- t A N C [ R 1 tt It 11 0 A D MAY APPROVE REDUCED SIDE YARDS. THIS WILL APPLY SPECIFICALLY TO LOiS 1, 4, 9, 10. 22. 26. 28. AND 33 _ _ _ _ - - 28 THE CENTRAL WASH ON THE SITE SHALL BE FENCED OFF AND PROTECTED FROM DISTURBANCE I -�«. �...:, M,. ... Y DURING INFRASTRUCTURE AND INDIVDUAL LOT DEVELOPMENT ��� � ►'`""•''•1'`• �" 29)KCRADI.NGSHAL-BE--LUTED--TO-ROADWAYS--ORANCE-IMP.-ROV-EMLNTS V-iUTYiN5T-AL1AT.0-AND- HOSEPA0wllt+-A-MAIMUM-OH0,OW-SUARE-40G �D-TOR-li-30-tO1S-02-WLDNG .I 5ROJECT OVERVIEW 3OXK ©i EAR 4' A RESTORATION BOND SHALL BE POSTED 10 PROTECT THE NATURAL OPEN SPACE (CENTRAL WASH). S TeRC9 SSETBRC 32 DEVELOPER INTENDS TO PROVIDE AN IN -LIEU FEE FOR PARK REQUIREMENT. ,Ty IN THE FUTURE, ACCESS TO TANGERINE ROAD MAY BE RESTRICTED TO RIGHT -OUT TURNING MOVEMENTS ONLY. Ts SIDE '5' SIDE34 PER SECTION 10-705, DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS WITHIN AND AROUND THE RIPARIAN HABITAT OVERLAY DISTRICT A DISPOSITION OF LAND IN IDENTIFIED RIPARIAN HABITATS. 12--INDMDUAL LOTS MAY BE PLATTED SETBACK W SETBACK TO INCLUDE RIPARIAN AREAS. PROVIDED THAT A CONSERVATION EASEMENT IS RECORDED ACROSS THOSE AREAS. SAID CONSERVATION EASEMENT MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING DIRECTOR AND THE TOWN ENGINEER. SAID CONSERVATION EASEMENT WILL PROHIBIT CONSTRUCTION, CLEARING OF VEGETATION. GROUND DISTURBANCE AND ALTERATION OF TOPOGRAPHY, REGARDLESS OF AMOUNT. OH(i ' - .Y.-w••-�+ • •••.... VARIES B �........ ...... .:-".. TYP. LOT LAYOUT FOUR F .....•r r„ IARa rt-r,r ' Rt,-20 N.T.S. TYP. LOT LAYOUT R1-36 N.I.S. AOVALS THIS PROJECT 1_ yrI E.C"V4tuel GIrtL , CLERK OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS APPROVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF GRO VALLEY ON THE S' ` DAY OF 199h . TOWN OF ORO VALLEY CLE ,TOWN Of 0 DATE MAP - 2 V 1 PIMA CCIUV DEPARTMENT OF WASTEWATER DATE MANAGEMENT ` Adm. Address: 1190 T ORO V - TOW ENGINEER D" ATE' ' W. Tangerine Rd. Qt 1h0t?2 OV12-96-14 ZONI DMINISTR4TOR DATE ASSORANCES ASSURANCES IN THE FORM OF A THIRD PARTY TRUST AGREEMENT, TRUST N0. J FROM LAWYER5TITLLOFA1t170NA,MC COMPLYING WITH THE ORO VALLEY ZONING DE REVISED, AS RECORDED IN OMKETIlotB , PAGE In , HAS BEEN PROVIDED 10 GUARANTEE DRAINAGE AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDING MONUMENTS) AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS (ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, GAS. EWER, WATER IN THIS SUBDMSION BY: DATE: Y Jj�f 1• MAYOR - TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ASSURANCES IN THE FORM OF A RESTORATION BOND FROMLwPz''^ 6 IN THE AMOUNT OF 1 11o.on___-__LAVE BEEN PROVIDED TO GUARANTEE THE RESTORATI OF THIS SUBDIVISION IN THE EVENT THE YJECT IS ABANDONED BY: DATE: .� f MAYOR - OWN OF ORO VATLEY A MONETARY ASSURANCE IN THE AMOUNT OF =AoA�4W_eo, PURSUANT TO SEC. 4-904, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO GUARANTEE THAT LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION WILL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PLANS. WATER ADEQUACY A CERTIFICATION OF ASSURED WATER SUPPLY HAS BEEN RECEIVED FROM THE DIRECTOR OF WATER RESOURCES. DATE. 3-1S`99 WATER UTILITY DIRECTOR �— RECORDING DATA STATE OF ARIZONA SEC. NO; 11910.-'7oST3 �Ss FEE $ 3 r, o0 COUNTY OF PIMA THIS INSTRUMENT WAS FILED FOR RECORD AT THE REQUEST OF THE W'LS GROUP, INC, ON THIS &N DAY OF AiRIL. 19 -IM , AT Z'•!y p WIN BOOK Si OF MAPS AND PLATS + � AT PAGE 16 THEREOF AT tV : ty . F. ANN RODRIGUEZ, PIMA COJNTY RECCROEP D- P�UiI�f*PIMA LUUNY R � CERTIFICATION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE BOUNDARY SURVEY SHOWN ON THIS PLAT WAS PERFORMED UNDER MY DIRECTION AND THAT ALL EXISTING AND/OR PROPOSED SURVEY MONUMENTS AND MARKERS SHOWN ARE CORRECTLY DESCRIBED I FURTHER CERTI THAT THIS PUT WAS PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECTION ,jM `S. -� RANCHO VI 7T 6 .:3f45d l435 •� 1� R I4 I vIDIDI> �.��- ROI:TF ,• cr BK. 4I, PG 693435N NE ROAD 2 JE n is •36 ® o I' 0 {; yf J' t WILE P {• N N o a a, =d 1 U I W fa I,"T u•t:s. L IRR c:ostEtty •c tt ea .o roJo LOCATION MAP A PORTION OF SECTION 35. E M. SW M, T-II-S. R-t3-E. G.k SRU_ TOMB OF ORO VALLEY. PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA P.U.E. GRANTED BY TN6 PUNT N.A.E. NO ACCESS EASEMENT (' SHEET BYATHI (R) INDICATES A RADIAL LINE TO A CURVE. INDICATES I/Y IRON PIN LAGGED BY AN RLS TO C3 NDICAIES CURVE NUMBER BE SEE L22 INDICATES LINE NUMBER INDICATES BRASS CAPPED SURVEY MONUMENT STAMPED SUBDMSKNN BOUNDARY B BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR TO BE SET UPON ----- ADJACENT IOT LINE COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. LOT IRiE INDICATES LOT ACCESS L - — LOT EWEi LINEDRIVEWAYS WILL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN RETURNS ------ 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN LIMIT ® INDICATES 10' X 10' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT a FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT AS NOTED 604 INDICATES LOCAL COORDINATE DATUM NUMBER (IRON PIN. BRASS CAP. ETC) (>?Te2.P M (SIGHT VISIBILITY EASEMENT) IMPROVEMENTS ppw HE AREA I 1 1 P� IC DRAINAGE ( yENT N ASESNOWNE IN TSECTION 13-1100S I-Al2�6—".A DIE THE ORO Y lEY 7qquuNG Qe4: L9n 25• CODE REVISEDISEE GENERAL NOTE 21) DEDICATION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, HEREBY WARRANT THAT WE ARE ALL AND THE ONLY PARTIES HAYING ANY RECORD TITLE INTEREST IN THE LAND SHOWN ON THE PUT, AND WE CONSENT TO THE SUBDIVISION OF SAID LAND IN THE MANNER SHOWN HEREON. WE HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE PUBLIC ALL RIGHT-OF-WAYS SHOWN, INCLUDING ALL STREETS. WE HEREBY GRANT TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY AND ALL UTILITY COMPANIES ALL EASEMENTS AS SHOWN HEREON FOR THE PURPOSE OF INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF SEWER AND UTILITIES AND OTHER USES AS DESIGNATED BY THIS PUT. WF THE UNDERSIGNED, OUR SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. DO HEREBY HOLD THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, THEIR SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, THEIR EMPLOYEES, OFFICERS, AND AGENTS HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL CLAMS FOR DAMAGES RELATED TO THE USE OF SAID LANDS NOW AND IN THE FUTURE BY REASON OF FLOODING, FLOWAGE, EROSION, OR DAMAGE CAUSED BY WATER, WHETHER SURFACE, FLOOD OR RAINFALL. IT IS FURTHER UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED THAT NATURAL DRAINAGE SHALL NOT BE ALTERED, DISTURBED OR OBSTRUCTED OTHER THAN AS SHOWN HEREON WITHOUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL. COMMON AREAS . AS SHOWN HEREON, ARE RESERVED FOR THE PRIVATE USE AND CONVENIENCE OF ALL OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION, THEIR GUESTS AND INVITEES, COMMON AREAS ARE SUBJECT TO AND SUBORDINATE TO THE RIGHT OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE UTILITY COMPANIES TO INSTALL, MOUNTAIN AND IMPROVE FACILITIES INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, CABLE TELEVISION FACILITIES, STORM DRAIN SYSTEMS, DRAINAGEWAYS, PUBLIC SEWERS AND ABOVE GROUND ELECTRIC iRANSfORMERS AND PEDESTALS AND UNDERGROUND FACILITIES. NO NEW OVERHEAD LINES SHALL BE USED. TITLE 10 THE LAND OF ALL EASEMENTS AND COMMON AREAS SHALL BE VESTED IN AN ASSOCATiN'OF INDIVIDUAL LOT OWNERS AS ESTABLISHED BY COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS RECORDED IN DOCKET (_qo;L--- ) AT PAGES (_)9--- ) IN THE OFFICE OF THE PIMA COUNTY RECORDER, EACH AND EVERY 101 OWNER WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHALL BE A MEMBER OF THE ASSOCIATION, WHICH WILL ACCEPT All RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CONTROL. MAINTENANCE, SAFETY AND LIABILITY Of ALL COMMON AREAS WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION AS SHOWN HEREON TLAR YERS TITHE Of RIIONk NC AN ARIZONA CORPORATION, AS TRUSTEE UNDER BY: / J RODDA, JUST dIFICER BENEFICIARY OF TRUST. TANGERINE HEIGHTS, LLC. STATE Of AR:1ONA) AN ARIZONA LIMITED LL48LITY COMPANY SS 3561 E. SUNRISE DRIVE, SUITE 215 COUNTY OF PIMA TUCSON. ARIZONA, 85718 (520) 529-3800 ON THIS THE DAY Of Y= , 1fA, BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED - OFFICER -PERSONALLY -APPEARED JoYCE AODPAWHO ACKNOWLEDGED HERSELF TO BE THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF LAWYER'S -TITLE OF ARIZONA, WC. AND BEING AUTHORIZED SO TO DO, EXECUTED THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT FOR THE PURPOSE THER I BY SIGNING AS ASSI NT VICE PRESIDENT. aro,t au • GGIIti�. CLAM( �• Cgwr� I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECTION AND NOTARY IC MY COM THAT THE 100-YEAR FLOOD PRONE LIMITS OR HAZARD SETBACKS NOTED WERE RNEWED AND SHOWN UNDER MY DIRECTION, TANGERINE HEIGHTS NOTICES OF CONSENT TO PLAT RECORED /% I= a IN DOCKETUQLL-PG. 1091 . AND LOTS 1 THRU QO AND COMMON AREA A WILL" DOCKET LU Lt PG.S41+ AND PORTION OF SECTION 33, T-11-S, R-15-E. G.& S.R.M. DOCKET11aZL_PG t^AS, WILLAM C. WALKER tIN)mt TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY. ARIZONA P.E., N0. 11065 T% SCALE: 1'=200' DECEMBER. 1998 OV/2-96-1� ALB/ 194069A-001-0106 OV9-95 O SHEET I of s 429. )' FOR THE LOTS I - 50. GRADING SHALL BE LIMITED TO ROADWAYS, DRAINAGE, IMPROVEMENTS, UTILITY INSALLATION, AND HOUSE PADS (INCLUDING YARDS) TO A MAXIMUM OF 12,000 SQUARE FEET EXCEPT FOR LOT 30 (NO LIMITS IMPOSED). THE PLANNING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR IS AUTHORIZED TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL GRADiNG UP TO A MAXIMUM OF 15,000 SQUARE FEET ON A CASE BY CASE BASIS. ALL AREAS NOT WITHIN THE GRADABLE LIMITS ARE TO REMAIN AS UNDISTURBED NATURAL OPEN SPACE WITHOUT WALLS OF ANY OTHER STRUCTURE OF DISTURBANCE. BOOK SZ- PAGE 28 ` $#30.)KXFCR LOTS 1-50, DRAINAGE EASEMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDED TO 25, 30, 31 TO REALIGN THE BANK PROTECTION. THE HOA IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF CENTRAL WAS OPEN SPACE AND THE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS AND BANK PROTECTION TO LOTS 25, 30, AND 31, LULL. 5, J-V. _24: -OK- CRNL'R/L NDTLs- 1. THE GROSS AREA OF THE SUBOMSION IS 37.74 ACRES. 2, THE TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS IS 48. 3. THE AMOUNT OF AREA IN NATURAL UNDISTURBED OPEN SPACE IS 4.79 ACRES. 4. THE AMOUNT OF AREA IN MEANINGFUL OPEN SPACE (RECREATION AREA) IS 1.02 ACRES. 5. THE AMOUNT OF AREA IN COMMON AREA 'A' IS 0.35 ACRES. 6. THERE ARE 0.6 MILES OF NEW PUBLIC STREETS IN THIS SUBDIVISION. 7. THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE IS 20.000 S.F. B. THE AVERAGE LOT SIZE IS 26.626 S.F. 9. THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT IS 18 FEET. 10, BUILDING SETBACKS ARE AS FOLLOWS, FRONT 30 FEET REAR 30 FEET SIDE - 15 FEET SIDE ADJACENT TO STREET - 20 FEET 11. THERE ARE THREE (3) PARKING SPACES PROVIDED AT THE RECREATION AREA 12. THE EXISTING ZONING IS R1-144. THE CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ZONING IS RI-20. THE DENSITY FOR THIS SUBDIVISION IS 1.27 RESIDENCES PER ACRE. 13. NO FURTHER SUBDIVISION OF ANY LOT OR PARCEL SHOWN WILL BE DONE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL. 14. THE AREA BETWEEN THE 100 YEAR FLOOD LIMITS REPRESENTS AN AREA THAT MAY BE SUBJECT TO FLOODING FROM A 100 YEAR FREQUENCY FLOOD AND ALL LAND IN THIS AREA WILL BE RESTRICTED TO USES THAT ARE COMPATIBLE WITH FLOODPLAW MANAGEMENT AS APPROVED BY THE TOWN ENGINEER. 15. THE BASIS OF BLARING FOR THIS SUBDIVISION IS THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SE 114 OF SECTION 35, To IS. R13E, G.&S.R.M. SAID BEARING BEING N89'43'41'E. 16.THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL CERTIFY AS TO THE FORM, LINE AND FUNCTION OF ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE ROADWAYS AND DRAINAGE STRUCTURES BEFORE THE RELEASE OF ASSURANCES. 17. THE PROPERTY OWNER, HIS SUCCESSORS. ASSIGNS OR A DESIGNATED HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION AGREES TO THE FOLLOWING: 1) KEEP ALL REQUIRED LANDSCAPED AREAS MAINTAINED IN A WEED FREE TRASH FREE CONDITION. 2) REPLACE ANY DEAD PLANT MATERIALS WITHIN 90 DAYS AND J) MAINTAIN THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IN PROPER WORKING ORDER. 18. THIS PLAT IS SUBJECT TO ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REZONING CONDITIONS PER OV9-98-01 AS APPROVED ON 6-3-98. 19. DRAINAGE WILL NOT BE ALTERED, DISTURBED OR OBSTRUCTED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL. 20. A HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION WILL BE FORMED TO ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTENANCE CONTROL, SAFETY AND LIABILITY OF PRIVATE DRAINAGEWAYS. DRAINAGE EASEMENTS AND COMMON AREAS. 21. CESS ACROSS FLOOD PRONE AREAS TO BUILDING SITES ON LOTS 15. 17. 18, 31 AND 32 WILL BE APPROVED BY THE TOWN ENGINEER AND SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DEVELOPER 22. THE DESIGN SPEED FOR COPPER SPRINGS TRAIL IS 30 M.P.H. THE POSTED SPEED FOR COPPER SPRINGS TRAIL SHALL BE 25 M.P.H. THE DESIGN SPEED FOR OTHER ON -SITE STREETS IS 25 M.P.H., THE POSTED SPEED WILL BE 25 M.P.H.. THE DESIGN VEHICLE FOR THIS PROJECT IS SU-30. 2,3, APPROVED IMPROVEMENT PLANS WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO FINAL PLAT APPROVAL. 24. BUILDING PADS PREDOMINATED BY 15X SLOPE SHALL BE DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE EXPOSED SLOPES. ALL AREAS OF HOZ SHALL BE WENTIFIED AND LABELED AS CONSERVATION AREAS. 25. SLOPES OF 15X OR GREATER SHALL BE GRADED & STABILIZED ACCORDING TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE, CHAPTER 10, ARTICLE 10-1. 26. THE AREA TO BE PRESERVED SHAH INCLUDE THE AREA OF THE 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN AND DENSE VEGETATION SURROUNDING THE BOUNDARY, AS IDENTIFIED ON THE VEGETATION MAP INVENTORY. A CONSERVATION EASEMENT SHALL BE PLACED UPON AND RECORDED TO PROTECT THE PROTECTED HABITAT ON THE EAST AND THE WASH ON THE WEST SIDE AS WELL, EXCEPT FOR WASH CROSSINGS, TO PROTECT THE AREAS IN PERPETUITY FROM CONSTRUCTION, CLEARING OF VEGETATION GROUND DISTURBANCE. AND ALTERATION OF TOPOGRAPHY. 27. ON -SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PUBLIC AND WILL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED TO PMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARDS. 28.a 8. RIPARIAN AREAIS SHALL BE FENCED OFF AND PROTECTED FROM STUR64NCE DURING CONSTRl/CT10N, W ACCORDANCE WITH THE RIPARIAN HABITAT ORDINANCE. 29. A RIGHT TURN LANE ON TANGERINE ROAD SHALL BE COMPLETED AS ONE OF THE FIRST ACTIONS BY THE DEVELOPER. 30. LOTS 17 & 18. 31 & 32 AND 40 & 41 SHALL SNARE A COMMON DRIVEWAY CROSSING THE FLOOOPLNN LINE DATA AND CONSERVATION EASEMENT CALL OUT AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE 31. THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATIONS SET FORTH BY THE ARIZONA GAME&FISH DEPARTMENT SHALL BE FOLLOWED PER SHERRY REINER'S LETTER TO FRANK CASTRO DATED 5-19-98: A. ADHERENCE TO THE 'GUIDELINES FOR HANDLING SONOR N DESERT TORTOISES ENCOUNTERED ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS. B. CONTACT THE DEPARTMENT'S TUCSON REGIONAL OFFICE IMMEDIATELY FOR DIRECTION REGARDING THE DISPOSITION OF AN ACTNE BAT ROOST SHE(S) IF ONE IS FOUND ON THE PROPERTY. C. DURING PRE -CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. CONTACT THE DEPARTMENT'S TUCSON REGIONAL OFFICE IMMEDIATELY FOR DIRECTION REGARDING THE DISPOSITION OF AN ACTIVE RAPTOR NEST(S) IF ONE IS FOUND ON THE PROPERTY. 32 NC SHALL BE LIMITED TO 10.000 S.F. FOR HOUSE PADS AND ACCESSORY USES; OTHERWISE GRADING SHALL BE LIMITED TO ROADWAYS, DRIVEWAYS, AND UTILITY INSTALLATION. AREAS OUTSIDE THE GRADABLE AREAS SHALL BE DESIGNATED AS NATURAL OPEN SPACE. BUILDING ENVELOPE SHALL BE STAKED AND PLANT SALVAGE PLAN SUBMITTED AND INSPECTED BY THE ZONING INSPECTOR PRIOR TO GRADING. J3. TO AVOID PROBLEMS OF SHALLOW LOTS, BUILDINGS ON LOTS 23,27.35.36 & 46 SHOULD FRONT COPPER SPRINGS TRAIL; ACCESS SHALT. BE FROM SIDE STREETS. THIS WILL ESTABLISH 30' FRONT YARD SETBACKS ON COPPER SPRINGS TRAIL AND READ YARDS FROM THE LINE PARALLEL TO COPPER SPRINGS TRAIL. 34. LOTS B.14,39 & 47 SHALL HAVE A SELF-IMPOSED REAR SETBACKS THAT ARE GREATER THEN 30. ESTABLISHED TO MEET THE MINIMUM LOT WIDTH REQUIREMENTS. 35. IF DRANAGEWAYS ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED, THEY WILL BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO APPROVED PLANS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY PERMITS FROM THE TOWN ENGINEER AND/OR BUILDING OFFICIAL. 36. THERE SHALL BE NO CONSTRUCTION WHICH WILL IMPEDE THE DRAINAGE FROM THE OUTLET AT COPPER SPRINGS TRIAL TO THE INLET AT PLACITA LUNA BELLA THE AFFECTED LOTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: 20-25, 28 & 29. LEGEND - BOUNDARY LINE (r) - MEASURED DIMENSION (R) - RECORD DIMENSION PER ADJACENT PUTS OR TITLE REPORTS A - FNO. SURVEY MONUMENT AS NOTED 0 - FIND. 1/2' IRON PIN TAGGED RLS 19316 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED • - NEW LOT CDR TO BE SET BY ARIZONA RLS 17139 A - BRASS CAP SURVEY MONUMENT TO BE SET PER STD./103 = 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN - SIGHT VISIBILITY EASEMENT NATURAL OPEN SPACE CONSERVATION AREA v & 25X SLOPE OR GREATER = INDICATES LOCATION OF ADDRESS & DRIVEWAY = POINT OF DISCHARGE - - - - EASEMENT LINE Ft - FLOODPWN LINE DATA AND CONSERVATION EASEMENT CALL -OUT CEI - CONSERVATION EASEMENT CALL -OUT ' VISTOSO RIDGE LOTS 1 TWRU T!M AWL ISO,*ti 0.15 12 11 TO 1 14 23 At B �r 17 1 16 22 = ! Q to 7 24 16 2144 y `IN 6 19 20 25 'A YA1TB s sNt I/ItC 26 5 N! S ! SN b AU Jt 30 29 I 28 27� ♦ i y3 Pl.IC? NI BLIJr! 4 32 1 33 A to 36 t 40 39 -37 Y Y * 3 'r' * 46 pJNA 1 PLAC?A 17 2 I s5 41 42 43 N 4B i RANGq DE ORO LOTS I< TNIU 02 TANOXXIM ROAD IX47, ro.n INDEX MAP ASSURANCES ASSURANCE IN THE FORM OF�.�� FRORI L�.�11eq��"�1R. '�-1'� � 1 i � �` A AS RECORDED IN DOCKET AMft'M , PAGE ll'tkR RLS DEEM PROVIDED TO GLARANTEE DRAM" AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS (INCLUDING PROJECT MONUMENTS) AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS (ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, GAS, R1-10 710S SEWER, Wsi�� S SUBDIVISION. �8t M�A 'OR, TO TOR, TO rnl�e'r OF ORO VALLEY --C R1T.) � • r{ RI -AT RI-70 _ ASSURANCES IN THE FORM OF 'qsm& ,J"VgON FROM Pra+Aa a 1ryw&&jh­Ano Aw 6-\xv*. 1RMoo j vAor IN THE AMOUNT OFIA-11e•o'O HAVE BEEN PROVIDED TO GUARANTEE or �) 1 THE RESEEDING OF THIS SUBOMSION IN THE EVENT THE PROJECT IS T ABANDONED. w+rrser Rao aio W LEr MW Vff*Pi, AI I LANDSCAPE ASSURANCES SCALE; 3"= I MILE AA.ASSURANCE IN THE FORM OFi4cd CSC 'IDLY FROM ►4t��� ""w��'�' BEING A PROPOSED SUBDMSION (N A PORTION OF SECTION 35, TITS, R13E G.&S.R.M. TOWN OF ORO HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO GUARANTEE THAT LANDSCAPING WILL BE INSTALLED VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLANS. CERTIFICATION OF ASSURED WATER SUPPLY A CERTIFICATION OF ASSURED WATER SUPPLY HAS BEEN RECEIVED FROM THE DIRECTOR OF WATER RESOURCES. "�A�•-�? Li A�� DATE: TOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATION OF SURVEY 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE BOUNDARY SURVEY SHOWN ON THIS PLAT WAS PERFORMED UNDER MY DIRECTION AND THAT ALL EXISTING AND/OR PROPOSED SURVEY MONUMENTS AND MARKERS SHOWN ARE CORRECTLY DESCRIBED. 1 FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECTION. V 17130 FRAW CL CASTRO FRANK G. CASTRO R.L.S. 17139 CERTIFICATION OF ENGINEERING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL ENGINEERING -WORK EFFORT AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT, INCLUDING THE DETERMINATION OF THE 100-YEAR FLOOD PRONE LIMITS AND EROSION HAZARD SETBACKS WERE REVIEWED AND SHOWN UNDER MY SUPERVISION. •/j{l/��J�' V rEEgS f4 FRAW(G. ' FRANK G. CASTRO P.E. /5685 CASTRO lib APPROVALS_ I, "Ifn f- -C-v 'kCLERK OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, HEREBY CERTFY THAT THIS PUT WAS APPROVED BY THE MAYOR AND CO NCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ON me el; DAY OF 19--u. . CLERK, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY DATE PIMA COU11TY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DATE C. �. 11-3-98 TOWN ENGINEER DATE WE THE UNDERSIGNED, HEREBY WARRANT THAT WE ARE ALL AND THE ONLY PARTIES HAVING ANY RECORD TITLE INTEREST IN THE LAND SHOWN ON THIS PLAT AND WE CONSENT TO THE SUBDIVISION OF SAID LAND IN THE MANNER SHOWN HEREON. WE HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE PUBLIC ALL RIGHTS -OF -WAY SHOWN HEREON, INCLUDING ALL STREETS. EASEMENTS. AND ROADWAYS. UTILITY EASEMENTS AS SHOWN HEREON ARE DEDIGTED FOR THE PURPOSE OF INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF UTILITIES AND SLIVERS. EXCLUSIVE EASEMENTS FOR TOWN USES AS S14OWN HEREON ARE HEREBY DEDICATED TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY. WE. THE UNDERSIGNED. OUR SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. DO HEREBY SAVE THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, THEIR EMPLOYEES, OFFICERS AND AGENTS HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL CLAMS FOR DAMAGES RELATED TO THE USE OF SAID LANDS NOW AND IN THE FUTURE BY REASON OF FLOODING. FLOWAGE EROSION OR DAMAGE CAUSED BY WATER, WHEINER SURFACE FLOOD OR RAINFALL IT IS FURTHER UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED THAT NATURAL DRAINAGE SHALL NOT BE ALTERED, DISTURBED OR OBSTRUCTED WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL WE HEREBY CONVEY TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PIMA COUNTY AND ALL UTILITY COMPANIES ALL EASEMENTS AS SHOWN HEREON FOR THE PURPOSE OF ACCESS FOR INSTALLATION AND MIANTANANCE OF SEWER AND UTILITIES AND OTHER USES AS DESIGNATED BY THIS PLAT. COMMON AREA W AS SHOWN HEREON IS RESERVED FOR THE PRIVATE USE AND CONVENIENCE OF ALL OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION , THEIR GUESTS AND INVITEES, AND FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND SEWERS. TIRE TO THE LAND IN COMMON AREA 'A' SHALL BE VESTED IN AN ASSOCIATION OF INDIVIDUAL LOT OWNERS AS ESTABLISHED By OWMAN7S, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS IN DOI,KET BOOKlogyti PAGE 19,44 IN THE OFFICE OF 111E PIMA COUNTY RECORDER. EACH AND EVERY LOT OWNER WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHALL BE A MEMBER OF THE ASSOCIATION, WHICH WILL ACCEPT ALL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CONTROL. MAINTENANCE, SAFETY AND LABILITY OF COMMON AREA 'A' AS SHOWN HEREON. FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE AGENCY, INC. OF ARIZONA. AN ARIZONA CORPORATION, AS TRUST [[ NO'ER,,TRRUST NOO..' 10,672 AN NOT IN THE CORPORATE CAPACITY. BY /L NG t �L - L .� TRUST OFFICER STATE OF ARIZONA ) } SS COUNTY OF PAN ) THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THISLA"- DAY OF,1998. BYlbMblim t. A'*-N- WHO ACKNOWLEDGED HIMSELF TO BE SENIOR TRUST OFFICER FOR FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE AGENCY, INC. OFi1RIZON4 NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES ® sw wnr�s.wo HMGGWIY BENEFICIARY ERIESIDE CONSTRUCTION, CO., AN OHIO CORPORATION 19601 VAN AKEN BLVD.. SUITE 48 SHAKER HEIGHTS, OHIO 44122 SEE SHEET No.2 For / `;_ I�_�_� Admin Address;BM Info ZONING J 1NISTRAToa DATEFINAL PLAT ?�� wLco,� RECORDING o 1 p POR STATE OF ARIZONA ` 5 l°14b1170A.ii `°�`" MOONRIDGE 1 SS FEE S'4.00 4quoM� I= 1 THRU 48 COUNTY OF PIMA / COMMON AREA 'A' (NATURAL OPEN SPACE & RECREATION AREA) THIS INSTRUMENT WAS FILED FOR RECORD AT THE REQUEST OF DlA ENGINEERING BEING A PROPOSED SUBCWSION IN A PORTION OF ON THISM-rd DAY OF DeCEA.IBCS, , 19, At AT11(*_, IN BOOK '" OF MAPS SECTION 35. TITS. RIJE, G.&S.R.M. TOWN OF ORO AND PLATS AT PAGE _72 THEREOF. VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA. DATE. 7-9b d jaENGINEERING CORP "-"-ofsrurc � �•�---,••-'� fLrm T. eaalcs ROAD.lnTns ae au-116-06 DEPUTY FOR PIMA COUNTY RECORUR TUC3001, ARtUMA 06706 d'o Job No. ERIE002 (IRO) a�a-aoa Lw) rR-Rus t*.*) J 8AMV 1 of 6 r. _ n >v C�l Lr'v. ,% i - I74. r I . r-LF. T - Appendix E Arizona State Museum Letter Site Analysis and Tentative Development Plan Chapala 3 Acres & George 3 Acres WLB No. 105013-A-001 August 17, 2005 �' i THE UNIVERSITY OF ona State Museum s * 0 'Q.Box 210026 Tucson, AZ 85721-0026 TucsoN AWZONA 520) 621-6302 AX: (520) 621.2975 May 28, 2005 Mr. Gustav Paul Oland, Project Planner The WLB Group 4444 East Broadway Tucson, Arizona85711 Re: Archaeological records check for parcel #s 21949-0050 & -0060, Chapala 3 >& George 3, WLB No. 1.05013 A-001, located in a portion of the SW'/;'SE'/. ofthe NW'/s of S35 T11S RI IE G&SRBL&M, in Oro Valley. Dear Mr. Oland: On May 25, 2005, we received a request for an archaeological records check for the above -referenced property. I have consulted our records with the following results. The property has not been inspected for archaeological. or historical resources, The Arizona State Museumtherefore recommends a surface inspection by a qualified archaeologist to determine whether there are archaeological or historical resources on the property. A list of qualified archaeological contractors can be viewed on our website at bttp://wN-,�.v.statemuseum arizona.edyinTofsvcs/pennits/pen-nittees.ast) Archaeological surface inspection required under city or county ordinance, or a federal regulation, will require a written report describing the results of the surface inspection and will include recommendations. The archaeologist you select should prepare your report using the standards titled: Standards For Conducting and Reporting Cultural Resource Surveys. Most contractors in Arizona have a copy of these standards. You are responsible for providing the report to the appropriate office requiring the inspection.' When surface inspections are required on private lands under city or county ordinance the archaeologist will also submitted copies of your report to the appropriate archaeological site file office. If you have selected an archaeologist from the list provided, that contractor knows where and when to submit reports. If you have questions or need further assistance please contact me. Sincerely, Su Benaron Assistant Permits Administrator Phonelfax 520-621-2096' sbenaron F �email.anzona.edu ♦4% 1 Appendix F Amphitheater School District Letter Site Analysis and Tentative Development Plan Chapala 3 Acres & George 3 Acres WLB No. 105013-A-001 August 17, 2005 i • s OFFICE OF LEGAL COUNSEL Ken Scoville District and Community Development Liaison (520) 696-5150 FAX (520) 696-5074 1 il C S .0 hr o f S 701 W. Wetmore Road - Tucson, AZ 85705 - TDD (520) 696-5055 GOVERMNG BOARD MEMBERS Kent Paul 13mabee, Ph.D. Patricia Clymer President Vice President Jefl'Grant Linda Loomis, Ph.D. Nancy Young Wright SUPERINTENDENT Vicki Balcatinc, Ph.D. June 14, 2005 Mr. 'Paul Olandjroject Manager WLB Group .4444 East Broadway Tucson, Arizona 85711 Re. OV9-05-04,6.6 acres (Chapala development) Dear Mr.. Oland: Amphitheater Public Schools is actively seeking the support of developers and liornebuilders; in the construction of new schools. We are doing so in a tirne.-when the District no longer exclusively controls such question.,; as when and where to build new schools. School districts may no longer issue Class A bonds for school construction. Under the Students First le gislation, tile Arizona State School Facilities Board (SFB) now finances new school construction. The-SFB uses different criteria than a local district might in determining whether to build a new school. Local districts have traditionally built schools, Nvith voter bond approval, in growing neighborhoods to accommodate increasing enrollment resulting from "new develo prilent. This tradition of building schools where homes are built ensured that students could attend "neighborhood schools." The SFB,. however, approaches things quite differently. 7he,SFB does not focus upon enrollment growth within specific neighborhoods, but instead across whole districts. Ifa district is experiencing growth in one neighborhood but enrollment is declining in another, the SFB decides whether there is need for a new school based upon "net growth," The SFB requires districts with capacity in some schools to absorb growth into those schools before tile SFB will build new schools. What this requires, of course, is that districts must redraw boundaries and/or bus students long distances to schools that are not within their neighborhoods. The SFB, when it does determine that a school must be built, is also building schools of a much lower pbvsical quality than those our local community has come to expect. Our recent experience has been that the SFB allocates about two- thirds of the resources we have normally allocated to build schools with bond fundin4y, Amphitheater Iligh Canyon d.-I Oro I ligh 0 b-onwood Rid -cc Hilt 0 Amphitheater Afternitiv.- ArMliftlicater Middle School 0 Coronado K-%* ScItooll Cross Middle Sch(ml 0 La Una Middle School * Wi6on K-8 Schuh Copper Creek r :guy * Wialck-n Elenumtuy itxrclsoii Ficnicut wy * I Iola" ay Elcrnenwy * Keeling Elcmcritary fanetr. M= Verde Elowitxy Nx-Ji Elementary lixnuA SkElcmcwuy s Prince Hementary 0 Rio Vista Elcrticntana Wa!Ui L-loncritan R Alm Cc- Ho, it i awr H f io, AGREEMENT The parties expressly acknowledge the withholding of the District's objection to be sufficient 1 Site Analysis and Tentative Chapala 3 Acres & George WLB No. 105013-A-001 August 17, 2005 Appendix G U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Letter Development Plan 3 Acres Gtaucidium brasilianum cactorum Cactus Ferruginous Pygmy -owl LE WSC' Gopherus agassizli (Sonoran Population) I Sonoran Desert Tortoise sC WSC GUIDELINES FOR. I-LANIDLING SONORA T DESERT TORTOISES ENCOUNTERED ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS Arizona Game and Fish Department Revised January 17, 1997 The Arizona Game and Fish Department (Department) has developed the following guidelines to reduce potential impacts to desert tortoises,and to promote the continued existence of tortoises throughout the state. These guidelines apply to short-tenn and/or small-scale projects, depending on the number of affected tortoises and specific type of project,' Desert tortoises of the Sonoran population are those occurring south and cast of the Colorado River. Tortoises encountered in the open should be moved out of harm's tiaray to adjacent appropriate habitat. If an occupied burrow is determined to be in jeopardy of destruction, the tortoise should be relocated to the nearest appropriate alternate burrow or other appropriate shelter, as determined by a qualified biologist. Tortoises should' be moved less than 48 ` hours in advance of the habitat disturbance so they do not return to the area in the interim. Tortoises should be moved quickly, kept in an upright position at all times' and placed in the shade. Separate disposable gloves should be worn for each tortoise handled to avoid potential transfer of disease between tortoises. Tortoises must ; not be moved if the ambient 'air temperature exceeds 105 degrees Fahrenheit unless an alternate burrow is available or the tortoise is in imminent danger. A tortoise may moved up to two miles, but no fiirther than necessary from its original location. If a release site, or alternate burrow, is unavailable within this distance, and ambient air temperature exceeds 105 degrees Fahrenheit, the Department should be contacted to place the tortoise into a Department -regulated desert tortoise adoption program. Tortoises` salvaged from projects wlich result in substantial permanent habitat loss (e.g. housing and highway projects), or those requiring removal during long-term (longer than one week) construction projects, will also be placed n desert tortoise adoption programs. .r1 Managers of projects lik:e1j, to affect desert tortoises should obtain a scientific collecting pertrzit from the Department to facilitate temporary possession of tortoises. Likewise, if large numbers of tortoises (>5) are expected to be displaced by a project, the project manager should contact the Department for guidance and/or assistance. Please keep in mind the following points: • These guidelines do not apply to the Mohave population of desert tortoises (north and west of the Colorado River). Mohave 'desert tortoises are specifically protected tinder the Endangered Species Act, as administered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. • These guidelines are subject to revision at the discretion of the Department. We recommend that the Department be contacted during the planning stages of any project that may affect desert tortoises. • Take, possession, or harassment of wild desert tortoises is prohibited by state law. Unless specifically authorized by the Department, or as noted above, project personnel should avoid disturbing any tortoise. RAC:NLO:rc STATUS DEFINITIONS ARIZONA,GAI JE AND FISH DEPARTMENT'(AGFD), HERITAGE DATA NIANAGEMENT SYSTEM (11I)1IS) FEDERAL US STATUS ESA Endangered Species Act (1973 as amended) US Department of Interior•, Fish and Wildlife Service (http://arizonaes.fws. ov) Listed LE Listed Endangered: imminent jeopardy of extinction. LT Listed Threatened: imminent jeopardy of becoming, Endangered. XN Experimental Nonessential population. Proposed for Listing PE Proposed Endangered. PT Proposed Threatened. Candidate (Notice of Review: 1999) C Candidate. Species for which USFWS has sufficient information on biological vulnerability and threats to support proposals to list as Endangered or Threatened under ESA. However, proposed rules have not yet been issued because such actions are precluded at present by other " listing activity, SC Species of Concern. The terms "Species of Concern" or "Species at Risk" should be considered as terms -of -art that describe the entire realm of taxa whose conservation status may be of concern to tite US Fish and Wildlife Service, but neither term has official status (currently all former C2 species). Critical Habitat (check with state or regional USFWS office for location details) Y Yes: Critical Habitat has been designated. P Proposed: Critical Habitat has been proposed. [ kN No Status: certain populations of this taxon do not have designated status (check with state or regional USFWS office,for details about which populations have designated status)]. USFS US Forest Service (1999 Animals, 1999 Plants: corrected 2000) US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Region 3 (http://www.fs.fed.us/rat) S , Sensitive: those taxa occurring on National Forests in Arizona which are considered sensitive by the Regional Forester. BLM US Bureau of Land Management (2000 Animals, 2000 Plants) US Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Arizona State Office (bttT)://azwww.az.blm..gov) S Sensitive: those taxa occurring on BLM Field Office Lands in Arizona which are considered sensitive by the Arizona State Office. P Population: only those populations of Banded Gila monster(Helodemia suspectuni cincturrz) that occur north and west of the Colorado River, are considered sensitive by the Arizona State Office. GFD, HDMS g "Mr.'Pi gland Therefore, we do not anticipate direct e#fe o✓9-�oS- a5 FIRST AAMERICAN TITLE TRUST 9035 WW 3V EMW M BE REooW I { A4IDI G EXI6NSION OF PRNAX MW J0 N /EQiESS EASF]i11T N N eaT THAT CE�/INOTf PMERiYTM MMWA = TO ffi REYOYM NLV K HOW - FI AL LOCAIM s _ ,—— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — o - - - - - - - - o - - - - - ` ♦ C�P� L0T CHAPALA 38 823 S.F. / 37 92 S F. ' PAD LEV. *2848' _ ♦ PAD LEV. t2849' \ � = 1 ♦ i *f i \ % ij CHAPALA 000000 ♦ r 38,803 S.F. , \ ; PAD ELEV. t2849' ���• ♦ )oe I o •1 �' 1 BOUNDARY ` _ i CITY OF TUCSON DEVELOPMENT STANDARD NO. 3-01.0 STREET DEVELOPMENT STANDARD BACK OF WEDGE SIDEWALK CURB OR FACE OF 501VERTICAL CURB AREA _ Id d 20" Ln 1 I r I N 1 I 1 1 a IN t I 60' I90°00�00� _ P.I. I (59.016 ) I / I I o I �� A, . VARIABLE / 0I ♦ 20. 46' 40" 1 I BACK OF WEDGE CURB OR FACE OF VERTICAL CURB 1 I 1 1 I I STANDARD R/W AND CURB KNUCKLE DESIGN FOR }----- ---- ---- 50' R/W 0 I T . I � PROPERTY LINE ( SIDEWALK AREA I I PROPERTY LINE 251 25' I 4 FIGURE 22 - STANDARD RIGHT-OF-WAY AND CURB KNUCKLE DESIGN FOR 50' RIGHT -OF WAY Fr i-: l -firV.x MA ;w S'iATZ OF ARIZONA ) COUNTY OF p I r witneu my cis MAIL J 1 hereby cergty that the within No, 175768 instrument ►+as filed for record 5 $pp to Pima County, State of Anions. 'Book ...... 4 7 f, IDA YT H Data:. A1�G' Co ty 16 dr it ' �at Re e t . : 1/iAtY �tSi '111le OF AR'tZU"A - ix :iat' Tpnnir:'red t:f .....For the eorisldaratloa of Ten Dollars; and other valuable consldaraUor•. ,-1 -(nr we) WAYNE C. WILLIAMS -AND. BARBARA..WIL?�.OAM.S; husband ands• v�f e - ' I r , do hers6y .CJNVEY unto. JAY VAN ORDEN AND NAJA V O1U ', husband and wife', not as tenanwin coa{mon aed:noPii a''eo"iimumli -0-roppeerty state, but aa:. a:nt.tenantswith right of survlvonhlp, the'tollowinX d'sacribid (ufal protest y situated in PTMA-X''y' Cotutty, Asisona: The Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section'35, Township 11 South, Range 13 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Pima County, Arizona. TOGETHER WITH an easomant for ingross and agrass ovor the East 30 feat of the,West Half of the Northwest Quarter.of'said Section 35. SUBJECT TO: -Taxes for the year 1977, and subsequent thereto. .-Mortgage from Wayne Williams and Barbara Williams, husband and wife, to Tucson Teachers Federal Credit Union, a corporation, dated April 1, 1977 and recorded April 5, 1977 in Docket Book 5497 at page 376 and re -recorded Apri' 18, 1977 in Docket Book 5506 at page 111. -Established and/or existing roads, roadways and highways. -Easement to Tucson Gas and Electric Company recorded in Book 5550 of Dockets at page 754. -Reservations in the Patent from the United States of America recorded in Book 59 of Deeds at page 168. -SUBJECT TOO'S CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDrE/.�/ n Dated this 15th day of lL`� ` UA-g w - W C. WILLI.4MS August .1977 BARBARA WILLIA&M The above dead is accepted, and approved by the Grantees, it being their L•ttention to acquire sold premises as joint tenants with the right of survivorship, end not as :o:nrncnitY vrooerty or as ten- 4 OFARXZONA This instrument was acknowledged before me this :•, .COUN OF. ; PIMA ss. day of August 1977 . by 'a WAV C W TAMS AND 13ARBARA WILLIAMS._husband and wife •My iomp)isilon expires: � L� nn '',, J �• ,� N My Comml+slee EYpir" Aug&, it. No ary Public 5fATt QF f ARIZONA �'• f Tfila instrument was acknowledged before me this t +1C{0�11�1I' OR. PIMA _� as. _ r✓� day of_Ailg1 aL__... 101E f by. OILMEN AND NAJA VAN ORDER, hua flfg_ ds... y .. .. I~CAWYeiusion'ixpirei; +� ^.. ,. 't' uy Conunh+lon Espinf iiu)nttl1& 19311.. • N 1ary Public ME 1�1)YeIS I I I IB L4 a °SEE REVERSE BIDE" ar •quaff. ,.; onoKP6.07fi . oeosa tio.'1G8,�'t6:trio:'. ..�•+;,' r 1 4 ;,. �T .� - l . t t7 P��i\��y�' i"�vla .. ,yS l ^�,j r 't (' ILA-B. �'1'1�x4 �'�YCk t r-1,k a C eu �4%1<!1 ay fi (t� } l:i i1rl tt / A .j�'1 a9,,.4.F, i5 a, t ' ..i' I . �. r , •r .h.11,., L "4� 4: a. i . ak C „ t!. e. I' , r:th� ��t, .l`tr;r \i."" ka*Jl i. Yr cA { ...,? �t '. \:l„w.v r1 .,t`1,±,, .A, , .. " — s I! 1y} l�f k, is 1J•At \,/lf. / Alt M Y A; Jk ! 4 -11 t. 1.V } ` 5•X rli // 'jjIIY•ft fkr rt�Ls , di1, ,L 'SIAi*!,,zVil I r ..r. t -Pile f.' i il!l7�,t{ `% -., A F i!!i, 1'F} y -,;-~, : S .I", \ 1K . 1 �( ,l .. - { i . ♦ 4 -- 't{ ? Y Y , 1=' l 71 -, t A i rG i, A! 1 i€d r '• i 4^ ��r) 1 i >. L 1 �". �\ F ir.l.l t _ r AAA} Y• A n. ' `°(r L t ,:,IA ,� . t + G, k� -1 ; r. r A f fir 2 t 1 t2 S t { ti` A i rr 6 1 x S C 1.1 k; t"/, Y y `+ t y rt� (? t a lai •, r pN It !l t G t { f" get, 4 1i / it Y d (d'�✓� 4!. t�T . . rwy� pd M:..lyi.7*r�'2t,. ,;ti} .. ti d4iA2! k t r i, d y S .I�`pp['`+� s , .r '4)�.G yr. g"wi'IiJ,C.iVi Ot YV il�YaoDitr� tG¢1y4 �1 ��{i'yY`1FF Illi rr,; t it FED a •",Y r.-!S 4j ,ly",'La. } 1 +r5�+':1 , j4 ', �!'� A it8aiiiat' for•fffAA,iagriia aat�l.aQraaa ;over the Eaat 30 AfeatraAd tha North 30,.faat x >w E rs Ktl +�1 s s�ytl tf ix bf'�thi WaittHalf'of�tkha°South "lfto'f,t a 3outheaatlQuartor of tha,North�rsat , r ,� I ; die .� �V Quitrt?!r of .Maid Sa�tion`;35.i11k�,ki,�, t`�r•ro c . ; i{ , `:'` ff'x>a y k T Jt 5 i141 �-\ !(TV }t. "",§f kril f ,. r v 9+ ST + '{ ,I s t{r i a r]j� ,�5 Zr li i ;K ? T r t +-L (J IT k t t�' E } �1 �'�i .4f't�,`�frra \ ♦ iy{',.t T I.. -1 , `'��: �.p\t,r.. i la •.` 1� ' (.Sa, s >.jt, 1 ih r.Y Y(, / n_ 1. r , 1 r �.''� ' 1 G tG .7l\''•. a r w A I :t wry. c r kt i1 �T i �, - r e a �, r, . i> iy y « yAtl 1 T - r, yi.�J•txa X}v 1C 4!( ` W�.a t d ,.)i. Gt41 M/ \y A. ,, .At'/ r+",(xxYr S°\r n•: `' 1 !t .W t V;. `, .. r tr r .{ Atk+. J- .. f % } Ff r: t e$ l r t sv ? , T A r 1 t. Y d it i r- k: t 11%t. ". i t. a. �G k t�.-t J is rA TP CAI !c 1,. Y ! iG r5 ! d F nc `i i t � qq j� < '. j t,.�,A`�`ji:i i 5:t�k;C� { : i I i f � lea - i J rt r 4 • ••r 1 .•, . 1 i 1-- V `' 1 f` Y a-tYj "'s t r t l.rr I,E >1 a. f j �,,4� 7f Si i, ,F. T A {. Rrlt�. 1k, f t F. r ,yM?4 f 1 r, 1 ; C. .ILL t t r� t 1, \G . t A. 2 t !1--Al 4 1 .s ` fkl. ' \ .1 tll 'l ., ♦ ;, " :rf t t .. t,.t xn . �2 i• t d Y .a yyf�� M°c 1"�,�• i i-";t v Jt "{! 1 fA 't Illft rp. r + I 5} 1', ,dot 1 I I; ih • \. r .. Fi ' h s r.. cc• rJ.a r ( A - .' A.. t. I..k t1 7 rat +i : ;J1! }t ;r .I A . r a j T A !f 1 A l r* 1 t i : I 1' i t t l •:, . . I,lj! t. ,I t e u F i 1 � 1 r r. , j t 1!. , FT A , ( 4l �¢ 9 4 .�y' 4 t i� i4 N Y �l LS A. Asti t 'i r d A C tl v x E I. 1 r r r + . l t, -' ,{ T l A 1lit4. ;-?WI 11y,'tt tt `rr nitrl �Y ` '' T `�rlr rt{, l •t k .! {' I. l�� rj VIA. *{ ' 1) .1i, fYt�.'srl' .L". 'r .l' ♦ - i t: lAt ! ! 1.%4 . 1 ,'j t• \ r', �l� .,ltt4lT,, gr rt , Yl 4 t kt* . �v F'P{x� t11�L{t FIB" T' 1 t,/rit it +�'�1 li ;a i f Y+�r,jF' ,�}kllr•. j8-�al,ft..��tt fl i t T lx+ ^ t ytt# F.° i(rFl...'j `"!'F�;�' d£F'�tl.@;tii y IEf F Y •t 0 i , ; j, ui a}1 4. r try G 'I . 1 'lot . .. _ +^\iy f'.`.e`; �la<St�1 ¢ \ Y;;i ". / A i A, 1. 19y%r1 a J. t 1 L rtYt1 *; l t e tt' liks F { +"' xI�;N,ri ,\! r F G A Y 4; C t ti+ l 7r S in' 15 3 r _ Y i,Fj,' C Y rtJit\ F i f I -I St )��57 irf• �.�i: kl Tr v r -{`\) ti r i K IftY {Il+r , k p l+y ti, v t ''. t 1'k r F i. d i+7; { S ,t I .r"o lnllr1rl i .1 ,at r �° i '•+ G ,-'f f r ,b r'; tf; t y t+ Y ' t ' 'iu l A t1 '° i{e` {;N tt�r`4tFti: kt iF ' J e f.,t r n' j: r'.t ._ r, hr l f 5r i� 7 , il' i YI A ti c e I \ ," r i t i 'IY41 qrl 'n' y. 1 t. d.. ..l A- , A� K , rIw, :'v1L }! .. !,t t,,'r'i,t n t f . . i _ 1 1, t y $ ( h J I'Tt ki L tt f,( F l t �tr G` , r 2 i e A l': +' i ,.'{'f: L G�_SI.J ril ii r' i ,S f 'y �t., i A<`F•i l! .0 a S [ nG - r t lG i tl a r tl 1 t+ i , li, ? 1. / G l i. 541 yj(1fa yFt )' 141t,t d f l Iti t ! A d I y t l,' 1 lr� l r}' A,,,iid W5,t, i ry .c rA,1 + r 1 AI 7 ' , ` r I.:'i - I !r fi ail t . r i „ r.':` ,r .. • : t �y I Fti t •rI t �" I-;! J 1 \kµ M'G'I-..+ t; t';,, IN r r t :L ! 1 - I.l' A, Tr t t/hi . j�'rt1n y r T.. ' Zr-t it i i '\ i'Y is >Ai* M..±i. `,"' } sA I A 1 , , ` F \ fir: �>,i'. I. 4 Saij I A s` t to •r t t '1 k 4 u� 1�yide (� - Li pp t -. y \ t ( J rd' �N I { 7 f:4 1x ?h`�t F x'. � t I r aTi ,'Y• r xVwis 3 ' 4 ikrn}aItil r JiP r t 1r cJ-r•, r ,r'. {i sr} 1 " sl G ' 4'r .. r'.il. f f !k .i 1 Iu1 '.i �S tit<. I \ i l: •) n t\Ye1 r 9a r Fry �r t f li^tII Jt'-r +t j dr 1 r G I M t G W .d if l r- y �t }i 4 /S iF ,F ,y ( n 3k, j' 1 J 7! A f `� n l t I t a . t a>, J v A •ni}. n ., g A t r G 4 e r 8 F yl J: 4 1 4, . 1 11 T y �t ,f A r it e�,or559i1 r6`?'? t I l pl ,t '� f �t 4e`' �• tP I ,�. r'' ` 1 :.I It v AI j! it' : t t i. 1 ' A r . i �L I ' 3 , h P�1yni Alt,; iISsG Ire rp:Ay iG. } t r,f "�Jr'{FFf41 G tt-t j l / 1 ' y,{�t 1 i� . /� .t1441 �l .I�•i I a 1 c rl� f ! h i l F 1 d A - •' r i i 1 L ; S 1 Il I p, •: !1/ A�dSr. 1 s'�Atii w4 Jhb Ar dt F s A. I A , 11 y k k �I e ! r Q ty p'i. 1� �(G 1 ff �x'^ rA J k -i ki !F ii/Jl 1i I t 1 rGf!Sa i14j MiI t 7 }4\,J� 7 !I :{? li �+}9e3?ilt,t fl,IW"S VY1 old iYt, is ,S f r I -1 1 :Y' Y. tl, t r f 33 a.' L9 n Sf ais r /k ,r t.kl"4 1 c fe i i f�..Y4t. R.Tr i lyt ti r .1 r - I,11 d .0 e f t ;U; t�l 1 tlts:glL+. a oA.J ii7.., .yy �l�?i6e...saA..,s I!tu.. t,i re,i 'ru,+..S.•1 M.: :..:e .s...i.. a. ,. ... ,d...e,fi,, i/.A.4..: 4.�a .3i:x,.., ,^ l.> 4..A. ..af'.!•K�4J.,. ftS.1.,.'l .:c::`t,:� „'ATF. OF ARIZONA '% COUNTY OFPim' } is. I hereby certify that the within Instrument was filed and recorded Fee No. In DOCKET �03 page is Z and Indexed In deeds at the request of t7SLTFE Title Company of Arizona MAY 2JZ9 -g AM When recorded, mail to: RICHARD C-MEIWIZA 5.301 N. Whispering Hills Line Tucson, Arizona 85704 Tax Corle 4 202-77-013C 9329- IM,H8 Witness my hand and offlclal l011 RAF SkMf? Cougfj Ree R4A ). , i) � - `De cv Rea,rfA�,r4• I Fee: U Z' Xnint (Tenttnr11 Bprb For +l-r• eonstdo-ration of Ten Dollars, and other valuable conslderatlons. I or we, WAYNE C. WILLIAMS, also known as I1rAYN17 IVILLIM1S, and BARBARA KLLIMIS, husband and wife i() hereby convey to RICHA.RD C.MFNrOZA and AN"GELA T. MEVD07-A, husband and wife Milt a. tenants in common and not as community property estate, but ai joint tenants with right of survivorahlp, the fol- lowing clr-scribod property sltuaied In the County of Pima State of Arizona. Tho North Half of the Foutheast Cuarter of the Southeast Cuarter of the M,rthwert Cuarter of Section 35, Township 11 Fouth, Range 13 Fast, Gila and Fplt River Pase and Moridian, Pima County, Arizona, Tff-rTHPR WITH an earcment For i nclress and Mrccs over. the North 30 feet of thr, Wort Fled f of the South FFa.l f of the Sifuthe lst Ovarter of the Northwest Quarter Of said Section 3.5. tiul'i••r•t ter rurrvnt Iaxrs and assrssrnrnls, rvscrvalums and :ill ea.ernenl., rit hls of wn%, r'm•enanls, conditions, reslr(c• tu"n . lu•m anti rncunthrarn r< (if r(•t•nrd. :\"(1 I "I wr• (if) Il- 1011• atlainsl all Irrr.nns uhnm n(vrv, stthirr•I In thr matters ahoy set forth. TIC• r' nlr (•. h} :irnint: Ihr a(•cr•plance helnw vviclrnrr their intention In acquire said premises as joint tenants with ' • . ,: ' ' ••f .((r� (, ,r•h;p. a(;.i r :(• mmuntt� ltrn�( r1p nr a. truants nt 4111111111011. I):rr• .1 •21st rLn of May STA'II• ctl: ARI70NA c' •,ram••: ..I Pima STATE OFArizona County of Pima 1,09 Grantees W10"l11134 rAuL ,)2- WAAYYNtF/V. WTTLLTAMSI WILLTAM._ Gr1'n oi's This instrument was acknowledged before this ` 1_day of__ M3Y _ i 19..79-'by. WAYNE C. WILLIAMS and PARBARA `VILLSAMS,, husband and wife Notary Public My commission will expire 1-24-84 This Instrument was ackn� 7ledged before me this 21 day of '''` y _T j,�I#IL by RICHARD C.MCNDGZA and ANGELA T. MENDOZ•A,• husband and wife _J r Notary Public' My cbmmlaslon will expire 1-24-84 'o...e r.,o NOT& 1. Now 16' Potable Water and 241 Reclaimed Water 2. Contractor to Provide Open Trench From TEP Mains to be Installed as Part 6Y-,Th1s Contract. -fiee-r Transformer to 4' Duct, and From 4' Duct - to Separate Water Plans. 24'.CAP -IM ,Ln�lnsfalled Service Pedestal. Contact TEP-Pr - )r In The Future by Others. %, 40 Duct Der SR-210 for Electrical PVr. REC MORM: M -NI W.'' AMM-1, ........... n�4.04 ME e, 0 I R'S M - Maw. ww w 'pg i & EM 0 2 m! az MEMO. et 2-361"' 25 IL 11 New R1W Owest closure Bok Needed to MaInfam 6' Dla. 40, 401 a,be R 90 na 00.00 Drwy..-- Ha%, Kai Sp C--�ExLlg�K LVII." 219-4 002? ca dg Title T 0040 -1110609 Smt View TCE Under by Others George, Joe & Rosemary 219-4970060 -as% p . RAT% Or AA=PA • 1 1+rver eeee.tl M. ^nei^ he 7578 .. terarwet .... 1er tve.ra Ae,e.•S S 9 0 COVWM Or ►Mt - sa Puma Ctp. at Arum" A. ^Vv 1 6 197] - A#1 t i7 rr.w. u, mpi t i oea..., CA ,YTH . t --A l! EFL TilL*WHEW LboOK'SOO"17 bW L T Ok achtt mrnam Ord - 9or %10 s.a.ad.ret" d Toe DOUWL sod etia► rabAble ooaidaett*as. 1 (ar Iml WAY" C. WILLIAMS AMD LALLUA VULIAM- husband and vifa do ►er.lct COKTTY car JAY 14AX OrD"' Atfl RAJA VAN OMCS, ht:alaad and wife are as teaeats is aeemason ared are as a a*aatatr.tq auto, as le ery tzArbecer4j of oarviwsrvN�ie tt , tilwat.s des cribed roof ! iumfat The Soothteaet Quarter of tta Southaaat Quartar of the brttweet Quarter of Section 35. Township 11 Scutt.- Laafa 13 Last, Gila *tad Salt Liver Sue and hcridia:, Pima CoaatT. Arizona. TOC[TIML WM as eure awoat for ictinea and *tss over the Last 30 foot of the Vest half of tba iartl:aaa Quarter of said Section 35• SUB.7LCr TO: -Taws for the Tear 1977- and sub""at thereto. -ilctiLaae fry Yane Villirr and Larbara Williams, b strand and wife. to T Tucaoo Teachers red.oral Credit Union, a corporation. Cattl. A.Fril 1, t977 and rec-orded April 5. 1977 in Docket took 3697 at pats 376; and re-racordsQ April If, 1977 is Docket took 350E at past III- -Lst.abliched sod/or a=ietint roadc, rosd.ra;3 and kta"ur7o. Caara.snt to Tucson Gam and Electric Caaran7 rscordad in ►x > 555G of Dockets at pass 75-4. -3aserrations is tbs tatant frwa the United States of Auerica rocor"d in took 5t of Doe" at page 163. -SUSJLCT To'S 001tT1w= Oa LLti2LSL SIDE. Doted am 1it_da7 of y C. 1711LIAft wt to 77 -..s JAZ tlra IiILL1A.'W 1 The et.s.s Las! . «wpwd and rp".- d t>' tM Graateec 1: br:nt Shea tatINAWN to WVM*ra c•S pr"who a p w Maaatr wuh the r:t`.t ct sur"%ocsh.p. and a: r �acuausv:; i=relrt•' ar O bov- emu r eertr.ot 7 lrtLnCa _ Tbu tastrunent was b�.erttdjed bodury rrw b t1 r.. 1677 br r �Q= cr lI?IA ti• *sr r i2�1 1"e �ws f * t R a • I1M. wry^' . •d Rri t- K) 1bavemboa set7eeae buboPub* as tweiie `` tt'fTAT! Q7 (►tTr1Y1 w Taw uwuvt.oaa tar aaimee#Aga1 Iador* as dko 1< b d--- Mp-e r . V iL . «tale 4Md hod M Ps -Doe i.a pm mrws� •Ant- «eeere •irc55iAt) soH7fi rtI -TATC 14' ARIZONAI 4 OUNTY f** PtKA A I WnTM O'ke MASM F i 9 ;-4 N roollf,.-I i lk rt ""lricf paid lwiottrd 0323GJ hht f ar ord d 7 'iglp , RAW td ANuma. Book -- Pap II►A MAf %1� Date:AER 0 5 107A•AN Counh Re r V Mqueat of: : iiirliy 111 U Ut AKWJM vuty i iii-CORDED TO. :! -f :--DNA a s�r4�1¢e �,�n��i, r vfluab I (fir we John E. Phipps t an undivided 3 n e t• n '' fit, n est� tj�e�rjer xan er sin lebma iatDB wife as to an un vi�e5�i�in eres�,as J60V E nv ��agh�•o�u�u riv s6#p..and do hereby CONVEY unto RODGER J. CLIFTON and JEANETTE E. CLIFTON, husband and wife not as tenants in common and not as a community propert�r state as joint tenants with right of survivorship, the following described real property altuated to P Chi Arlsofia: The South half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 35, Township 11 South, Range 13 East Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Pima County, Arizona. TOGETHER WITH an Easement for road purposes over the East 30 feet of the North Half of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast �. Quarter of Said Section 35, as set forth in instrument recorded in Docket Book 4523 at page 677. SUBJECT T0: Taxes for the year 1974 and subsequent thereto. Established and/or existing roads, roadways and highways. Reservations in the Patent from the United States of America recorded in Book 159 of Deeds at page 168. Mortgage from John E. Phipps, a single man; and Jerry L. Alexander, a single man; and Melvin R. Butter and Virginia G. Butler, husband and wife to Lawyers Title of Arizona, an Arizona corporation, as Trustee tinder Trust No. 5592-T recorded November 8, 1972 in Docket Book 437 t page 35e � Dated this 14 day of :• Dec er 3 0• (S,y ..r s1A•�sceFe_���C itF1V3tC . The above deed is accepted and approved by the Grantees. it being their intention to acquire said premises as joint tenants with the right of survivorship, and not as community property or as ten. � ants in common. �. uE STATE OF ARIZONA_ This Instrument acknowlsd Prd COUNTY OF. PIMA_ ss. —day of i John E. Phipps, a single man H"` s:�} aIy commission expires: Notary STATE OF AR i Z ONA ]) 'h!f Antruntent flaw y � 'Me! this COUNTY OF PIMA 1 aJr. �7 J��,,,' 1e . by, ti .ferry L. Alexander a single Imam �•+ )Vfy commission espirtn' sao!� OFA oeote r�'i="•�104`;1�6-GB 0/ MaOftA _ /YJV % Of `ACTION 3.3 T. %% S. R. �MFWDOZ.4 .CANp ■ ■ ._.� rt�rm s � E�s�sNENr PIONEER NATIONAL d TITLE INSURANCE 6c ROAD caWN�yED Tp ATICOR COMPANY COVKry 8y DEED 6099%�l09 t'RE� rEJ By ENGINEERING CONDITIONS OF REZONING OV9-05-04 CHAPALA/GEORGE PROPERTY 08/31/2005 1. Clearly define that the maintenance responsibilities of the driveway on the George property include that it remains dust free. Add a note that the maintenance responsibility is to be in perpetuity. EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OV9-05-04 1. All Standard Conditions for Non -PAD Rezonings must be adhered to (attached). 2. The cul-de-sac shown on the Tentative Development Plan shall be extended to the north property line of the Knott/George property. Furthermore, cross access easements shall be provided for the owners and future owners of the Mendoza and Knott/George properties. 3. All saguaros shall be preserved in place. 4. Grading on lots shall be limited to 15,000 square feet excluding access. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY STAFF REPORT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TO: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FROM: Robert Conant, Senior Planner MEETING DATE: August 2, 2005 SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING — OV9-05-04, THE WLB GROUP, REPRESENTING CHAPALA AND GEORGE, REQUESTS A REZONING FROM R1-144 (RESIDENTIAL WITH 144,000 S.F. LOT MINIMUM) TO R1-36 (RESIDENTIAL WITH 36,000 S.F. LOT MINIMUM) FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF LA CANADA DRIVE SOUTH OF MOORE ROAD, PARCELS 219-49-0050 AND 219-49-0060 OWNERSHIP: AGENT: Joe and Rosemary George 1191 W. Moore Road Oro Valley, AZ 85737 The WLB Group 4444 E. Broadway Tucson, AZ 85711 Chapala Partners, LLC P.O. Box 69056 Oro Valley, AZ 85737 PETITIONER'S PROPOSED USE AND STATED REASON FOR THE REQUEST: The applicant states that the rezoning would allow the development of five (5) single-family lots on the 6.6 acres consistent with the General Plan. BACKGROUND: Currently, the Chapala property is undisturbed desert and the George property has a single home. The topography of the site is relatively flat. Vegetation consists of Palo Verdes, Mesquites, Acacias, Barrel Cacti and Cholla. There is one significant saguaro on the site to be preserved in place. The vegetation within the project area is representative of the Arizona Upland Subdivision of the Sonoran Desert. There are no riparian areas on site. Two small drainages originate in the site and flow south. A Preliminary and Final Plat will be required for the Chapala property in order to subdivide the site as depicted on the attached Tentative Development Plan. SURROUNDING LAND USES: Orientation Zoning Land Use North R1-20 Residential Vistoso Highlands South R1-144 and R1-20 Single House and Vistoso Gateway East R1-144 Single House West R1-144 and R1-20 Vacant and La Canada Hills TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Page 2 TENTATIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN: The Tentative Development Plan (TDP) submitted for the site is in general conformance with the requirements of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised (OVZCR). Currently, the George, Chapala, Knott/George and Mendoza properties all take access from La Canada Drive, via access easements (see attached aerial). The Tentative Development Plan for this rezoning proposes a private cul-de-sac street which will provide access for the George and Chapala properties. Staff has recommended a condition of this rezoning to extend the cul-de-sac in a manner to organize access by focusing on use of one main street — opposed to a patchwork of unimproved easements. If the cul-de-sac for the Chapala property is extended south between lots 2 and 3 to the Knott/George property, this will provide organized and improved access for the area. The need for this planning will be particularly important if the other properties are rezoned to a higher density in the future. Access has been provided for the Mendoza property from the north and south. North Tall Grass Drive in Tangerine Heights dead ends at the southern property line of the Mendoza property and a stub street has been constructed to the north property line from Vistoso Highlands. These two streets provide future access to the Mendoza property if and when it is rezoned and subdivided. Topography Impacts: The site is relatively flat with the following cross slopes: Chapala 3.54% and George 3.07%. Wildlife and Vegetation Impacts: Currently, there is little evidence of endangered wildlife habitat in the project area. A letter from the Arizona Game and Fish Department has been included in the site analysis report. Viewshed Impacts: Views of the Catalina Mountains to the east and the Tortolita Mountains to the northwest are visible from the subject properties and from adjacent properties. Affects on these views by the proposed four new residential lots will be minimal, if any, due to the size of the adjacent lots and the proposed lots. Traffic Impacts: This applicant proposes a private drive to serve the three lots created on the Chapala property, a new access easement out to the La Canada right-of-way for the George property, 'and the new lot created on the southern end of the George property. Grading Impacts: The developer of the Chapala property will install the street, utilities and drainage improvements via a type 2 grading permit. Each lot, including the new lot created on the George property, will require separate grading plans and type 1 grading permits to construct the homes. All requirements of the Grading Ordinance, Chapter 22, Section 22.10 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised apply to this project. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Page 3 Drainage Impacts: This project has no areas with 100-year discharges greater than 100 cfs; therefore, there are no onsite drainage facilities. All existing drainage patterns will be maintained in the developed condition. Water Impacts: The Oro Valley Water Utility will serve this project. The average daily demand will be 120 gallons per person per day and the total demand will 1296 gallons per day. The developer and/or individual home owner will be required to pay for the infrastructure improvements. Water service will be provided via a 12-inch line located in the La Canada right-of-way. Sewer Impacts: The site will be served by public sewers and connections will be made to an existing 12-inch main in La Canada Drive. The individual home builders will have to receive approval from Pima County Wastewater to connect to the existing sewer line. SCHOOL IMPACTS: The Amphitheater School District has sent a letter included in the site analysis requesting the applicant consult with district. Based on the generation factors for the school district this rezoning will product the following number of school children: Elementary 2 Middle School High School In compliance with Resolution 04-15, the applicant has met with the school district. GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE: Staff has evaluated this rezoning proposal against the General Plan Land Use Plan and Policies, and finds that overall the proposal conforms to the General Plan based on the following: Land Use: The General Plan land use map designates this property as Low Density Residential 0.6-1.3 dwellings per acre. The density of the proposal is 0.76 dwelling units per gross acre. Natural Resources: The goal of this policy is to protect the Planning Area's natural attributes. Policy 8.1N states that "Mass grading is prohibited for all residential developments 2 RAC and under........" Because of the lot areas shown on the Tentative Development Plan, all lots will be custom graded in accordance with this policy and grading limits will be established to protect native vegetation. Saguaros will be preserved in place. There are no significant washes on the site. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Pau 4 Public Facilities and Services: The proposed plan complies with the goal to "ensure that adequate public facilities and services are provided when needed." The major service providers have no objection to this rezoning. NOTIFICATION: All property owners within 600 feet have been notified of the proposed rezoning. Furthermore, the property was posted in accordance with State Statute and the OVZCR. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the Town Council approve OV9- 05-04, rezoning 6.0 acres located on the east side of La Canada Drive south of Moore Road form R1-144 to Rl- 36, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit A finding: 1. That upon satisfaction of the conditions the project will be in compliance with the Oro Valley Zoning Code and General Plan. 2. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the General Plan land use designations to the north, south and east. 3. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the current zoning for properties to the north, south and west. 4. That the proposed rezoning will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the residents in the area. SUGGGESTED MOTIONS: The Planning and Zoning Commission may wish to consider one of the following suggested motions: I move to recommend that the Town Council approve OV9-05-04, rezoning 6.0 acres on the east side of La Canada Drive south of Moore Road from R1-144 to R1-36, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit A attached, herewith. X0 I move to recommend that the Town Council approve OV9-05-04, rezoning 6.0 acres on the east side of La Canada Drive south of Moore Road from R1-144 to R1-36, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit A attached herewith and the following added conditions: •• I move to recommend that the Town Council deny OV9-05-04, rezoning 6.0 acres on the east side of La Canada Drive south of Moore Road from R1-144 to R1-36 finding that: TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Page 5 Attachments: 1. Exhibit A 2. Aerial location map 3. Site Analysis 4. Tentative Development Plan cc: Linda Thompson The WLB Group Fax (520) 881-5313 ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR NON-P.A.D. REZONINGS Completion of the following requirements for a rezoning ordinance within the time frame specified herein from the date of approval by the Town Council: 1. Submittal of a complete hydraulic and hydrologic drainage report. 2. Approval of a development plan and/or recordation of a final plat as determined necessary by the appropriate Town Departments. 3. A suitable arrangement with Pima County Health Department or Pima County Wastewater Management for sewage disposal. 4. Recording a covenant holding the Town of Oro Valley harmless in the event of flooding. 5. Provisions of development -related assurances as required by the appropriate Town Departments. 6. Recording a covenant to remove only that vegetation that is necessary for building pads and accessory uses and the necessary roads and driveways and to salvage all healthy Palo Verde, Mesquite, Ironwood, Saguaros, and Barrel Cacti for on -site landscaping purposes. 7. Recording any other development -related covenants as determined necessary by the appropriate Town Departments. 8. Roads shall be constructed in conformance with the Town of Oro Valley standards. 9. Landscaping to consist of low water use and low pollen -producing vegetation. 10. Adherence to the Tentative Development Plan approved by the Oro Valley Town Council. 11. Significant change to the Tentative Development Plan or conditions of rezoning, as defined by Section 3- 104(B), shall require re -review by the Planning Commission and Town Council in accordance with Chapter 3 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised. 12. The relocation and/or extension of utilities pursuant to the development or redevelopment of the subject parcel will be at no cost to the Town of Oro Valley. 13. Dedication of public rights -of -way through plat recordation in accordance with current Town ordinances. 14. Posting Development Opportunity Assessments (DOAs) in an approved form as determined necessary by the appropriate Town Departments. 15. Submittal of a traffic impact analysis in accordance with Section 9-110(1), unless modified by the Town Engineer and Zoning Administrator. 16. Completion of the requirements for a zoning ordinance within two (2) years from the date of approval by the Town Council. If the specified time frame is not met and no extension is granted this conditional approval shall lapse. Y F•.. Yk df , .,gip•, ` r - .. ✓ a'.,. i st i � y Y 'tk - . N". y _ i "�'• S eL j Jnn `fay P,t Croy 8' 12" 10' 10' 12" 11 I 11 w LU 0 cn �qUq Z U Cq Z m Q c H w (� Q s Z m 38' PRIVATE DRIVE a /, w W CD t March 7, 2005 Town of Oro Valley Planning & Zoning Department 11000 N.La Canada Dr. Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 OV905-0004 CHAPALA 3 ACRES & GEORGE 3 ACRES Southwest Gas Corporation has no objection to the platting of the above mentioned project. However, existing natural gas facilities are located in adjacent right-of-way which may be affected by construction of this project. Blue Stake should be notified 48 hours prior to construction. Further information regarding natural gas facilities on or near this project may be acquiredby contac ' g me at 794-6049. V"—��C RICK BARON/ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN 3401 East Gas Road / Tucson, Arizona 85714-1994 P.O. Box 26500 / Tucson, Arizona 85726-6500 / (520) 889-5600 WIMAI Q%A/rnac rnm February 1, 2006 David Little WLB Group 4444 E. Broadway Tucson, Az 85711 Re: OV12-05-04, Chapala 3 & George 3 Dear David: The improvement plans have been accepted. Please send in the mylars to be signed. In accordance with the ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED (OVZCR) SEC.4-705-C, the technical accuracy and conformance to the current minimum design standards and requirements of the Town of Oro Valley, and other applicable standards are the responsibility of the design engineer. A type 2 grading permit is.required for this project. I have attached a type 2 permit application and a type 2 grading permit checklist for you use. The type 2 grading permit checklist has been prepared to show you all of the items that we have, the checked off items, items that'are needed, the blank box items, and items that are not required, the crossed out item. A construction bond is required for this project. Please refer to Article 4-9 of the OVZCR for items that must be included in the bond estimate. Submit the bond estimate to our Development Coordinator, Shirley Gay. If you wish to contact her regarding the construction bond her phone number is 2294849. A pre -grading meeting will be set when we have all of the items required by the type 2 grading permit checklist. The outcome of the meeting will be the issuance of the grading permit. Please bring the permit fees to the meeting so that there will be no delay on issuing the permit. Any proposed revision or modification to this accepted plan shall be submitted to the Town for review and approval prior to such revision/modification being made in the field. "As Built" Plans of final site construction shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and acceptance prior to the request for final site inspection and full release of the construction bond. If you have any questions, please call me. Sincerely, Paul Keesler, P.E. Development Review Division Manager XC: S. Gay L. Garrick CLOSEOUT PACKAGE I C,�up�xc Private Road Irrzprku veacunt Closeout Package WLB No. 105013-AOOI Engineer's Certl'*filcation Letter The Group Inc. April 6, 2007 Paul Keesler, P.E., Development Review Division Manager Oro Valley Public Works 11000 North La Canada Drive Oro Valley, AZ 85737 Subject: Chapala 3 & George 3 OV12-05-04 Private Road and Sewer Improvements WLB No. 105013-A-001-000 Dear Paul: Engineering • Planning Surveying • Urban Design Landscape Architecture The grading, sewer, water, drainage, utility and paving improvements for the Chapala 3 & George 3 Private Road Improvements are complete and have been constructed in substantial compliance in accordance with the Approved Plans and Specifications. Attached are the surveillance reports, material test results with Geotechnical Engineer's Certification letter, and the as -built drawings mylars with 2 sets of bluelines for your review and acceptance. At this time, we are requesting a final inspection of the private improvements for a full release of all permits, bonds, and any assurances posted for this project. If you have any questions, please contact me at (520) 881-7481 ' Sincerely, The WLB Group, I David W. Little, P.I Project Manager cc: Randy Farris, Chapala Partners File Engineering • Planning • Surveying • Urban Design • Landscape Architecture Offices located in Tucson, Phoenix, Las Vegas • E-mail: Tucson@wlbgroup.corn 4444 East Broadway • Tucson, Arizona 85711 • (520) 881-7480 • FAX (520) 881-7492 Surveillance Revorts Re ort Number. Page Number. Construction Progress and Inspection Report Week Ending A •� . a� WLB Project #: df!`j/ dO Project Name C/yl 3 �y m 6rE" Page of Z-y/�iJ/Contractors Name / 4 1. Rough estimate of percent completion to date of construction phases (include items such as clearing, grading, drainage, base, surface, lighting, etc.). 2. Brief outline of work completed or in progress this period. 13. Brief weather summary this period inch iriinn _ __ _777 a-rr•�-•••••�••-•y ciia„ a„u PC„uuS Ui Deiow freezing temperature (on earthwork jobs, include soil conditions). 'ed2r&i� :5 O� /Z�i.G � �1ivL �� Y�i Tia 4. Contract time 5. Brief summary of laboratory and field testing this period. No. days Last working Charged Day charged /�6 j ��C,,c•� �,L� !� �- To date (date) 6. Describe anticipated work by contractor for next period. 7. Problem areas/other comments (revisions to difficulties, etc.). "�A WLB Group inspector or Date Printed name and title /-//- oq � approved or denied, Sign FriP,,M,.M Project Name: Chapala 3 & George 3 Job Number: 105013A001 Report Number: 1 Page Number: 2 Construction Progress and Inspection Report Daily Log: (8/10, 8:55 a.m): Gila Contracting has men and equipment now preparing to excavate from the newly poured manhole base at the public sewer line, manhole #1, towards the series of 4 cleanouts in the private drive. S.D.R. 35 plastic 6" sewer pipe is onsite and ready for installation. _(8/11, 9:35 a.m.): The new manhole, #1, over the existing public sewer line has now been set on the base and partly backfilled. Gila Contracting is now excavating and installing 6" P.V.C. sewer pipe from manhole #1 thru cleanout #1 and proceeding towards cleanout #2. Rich Ahrendt, Field Inspector Tw�tLe� p Group D Report Number: @,— Page Number: Construction Progress and Inspection Report Week Ending • 21 06 WLB Project #: Project Name Page / of Contractor's Name i G 1. Rough estimate of percent completion to date of construction phases (include items such as clearing, grading, drainage, base, surface, lighting, etc.). / I ��'� /f`• G•�J �,� �o � /moo j /y�i� �,�. 2. Brief outline of work completed or in progress this period. 13. Brief weather summary this period including approximately rainfall and periods of below freezing temperature (on earthwork jobs, include soil conditions). 4. Contract time 5. Brief summary of laboratory and field testing this period. No. days Last working Charged Day charged To date (date) 6. Describe anticipated work by contractor for next period. 7. Problem areas/other comments (revisions to plans and difficulties, etc.).. / !v WLB Group inspector or repres, Date Printed name and title or denied, delays, Project Name: Chapala 3 & George 3 Job Number: 105013AO01 Report Number: 2 Page Number: 2 Construction Progress and Inspection Report Daily Log: (8/21, 10:00 a.m): The private sewer system, both main and H.C.S. stub outs have been completely installed and are being backfilled and compacted at this time. From cleanout #2 thru cleanout #3 to cleanout #4 the 6" line was lowered to 1.00% from planned 3.66% in order to have 5 feet of cover at the H.C.S. stub outs Backfill of the system should be complete today. Geotechnical Engineer's Certification C/ 10 1 Fo-,, Repots April 3, 2007 New Rand Development PO Box 69056 Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 Attn: Randy Farris Re: Chapala Residence 12492 North La Canada Tucson, Arizona Terracon Project No. 63061212 Irerracon Consulting Engineers & Scientists 355 South Euclid, Suite 107 Tucson, Arizona 85719 Phone 520.770.1789 Fax 520.792.2539 www.terracon.com Our firm has completed observation and earthwork testing services during grading operations for the referenced project. These services were provided during the period of August 2006 through March 2007. Our observation and testing indicates the soil placement and compaction for the building pads was accomplished in general conformance with the project requirements. Our services relative to the preparation of these building pads is complete. Care must be taken so that future construction activity does not disturb the earthwork prior to placement of foundations. We based our opinions and conclusions on our observations and tests for the area described in this letter. We make no representations on the adequacy or consistency of soil preparation or compaction in other areas of the site. We performed our earthwork observation and testing services and provided our professional opinions using the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable engineers practicing in southern Arizona. The purpose of our field representatives at this site was to provide our client with a continuing source of information regarding compliance of earthwork with the project requirements. Our presence at the site did not include any superintending, supervision, direction, or responsibility for the safety of the contractor's work or personnel or subcontractors. The exact locations of building pad and pavement areas were unknown at the time of our observations. Our work did not include verifying dimensions or elevations, but rather checking the subgrade preparation and construction of subbase fill. Delivering Success for Clients and Employees Since 1965 More Than 80 Offices Nationwide Chapala Residence Terracon Project No. 63061212 If you have any questions regarding our services or this letter, please contact me. Sincerely, TERRACON CONSULTANTS, INC. Brent M. Borchers, P.E. Department Manager IIIELD DENSITY TESTING I Fbport Number: 63061212.0012 Service Date: March 5, 2007 Irerracan 355 South Euclid, Suite 107 Tucson, Arizona 85719 (520)770-1789 lient: ew Rand Development ttn: Randy Farris O Box 69056 Pro Valley AZ 85737 Report Date: Project: Project No.: March 28, 2007 Chapala Project 12492 N La Canada Marana, AZ 63061212 Material Information Lab Test Data Project Requirements Optimum Max. Lab Water Dry Unit Water Minimum Dry Material Laboratory Content Weight Content Unit Weight No. Test Method Description and Classification N (pcf) N (% compaction) 612120009 ASTM D698-91 Aggregate Base Course 9.0 131.4 100 min Field Test Data Probe Water Dry Unit Dry Unit rest Lift/ Mat. Depth Content Weight Weight No. Test Location Elev. No. (inches) N (pcf) (% compaction) Roadway 1 40' E of La Canada 0.0 1 4 4.4 128.7 98 * 2 260' E of La Canada 0.0 1 4 6.9 127.6 97 * 3 350' E of La Canada 0.0 1 4 5.2 122.0 93 * 4 Retest, 40' E of La Canada 0.0 1 4 5.6 132.3 100+ 5 Retest, 260' E of La Canada 0.0 1 4 6.2 132.0 100 6 Retest, 350' E of La Canada 0.0 1 4 6.1 135.1 100+ Datum: Finished Aggregate Base Course omments: n asterisk (*) appears next to test results which do NOT meet the project specifications. Field Test Method: ASTM D2922, ASTM D3017 ;augeID: 31001 -erracon Rep: Tony Greene report Distribution: New Rand Development Reviewed by: auf Department Manager II -Technical ke tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use of the client indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written consent of our company. Test results transmitted herein are only applicable the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical aterials. Page 1 of 1 07�7-F—Key Irerracon I IELD DENSITY TESTING le rt N b r• 63061212 0010 po um e . 355 South Euclid, Suite 107 Service Date: February 27, 2007 Tucson, Arizona 85719 (520)770-1789 lient: Report Date: March 30, 2007 ew Rand Development Project: Chapala Project ttn: Randy Farris 12492 N La Canada O Box 69056 Marana, AZ Oro Valley AZ 85737 Project No.: 63061212 Material Information Lab Test Data Project Requirements Optimum Max. Lab Water Dry Unit Water Minimum Dry Material Laboratory Content Weight Content Unit Weight No. Test Method Description and Classification N (pcf) N (% compaction) 612120001 ASTM D698-91 Native 9.7 125.0 95 min Field Test Data Probe Water Dry Unit Dry Unit rest Lift/ Mat. Depth Content Weight Weight No. Test Location Elev. No. (inches) M (pcf) (% compaction) Roadway 1 15' East of La Canada Rd 0.0 1 6 6.3 125.3 100 2 70' East of La Canada Rd 0.0 1 6 7.0 122.0 98 3 175' East of La Canada Rd 0.0 1 6 7.9 120.2 96 4 Center of Circle Dr. 0.0 1 6 7.1 123.6 99 atum: Finished Subgrade omments: est results on this report meet project specification. ield Test Method: ASTM D2922, ASTM D3017 iauge ID: 31001 -erracon Rep: Tony Greene report Distribution: ) New Rand Development Reviewed by Zbenauf Manager, Construction Services he tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use of the client indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written consent of our company. Test results transmitted herein are only applicable the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical aterials. Page 1 of 1 074R07f w„K" Irerracon 'ELD DENSITY TESTING 4Zeport Number: 63061212.0008 Service Date: December 27, 2006 Tuc South Euclid, suite 107 Tucson, Arizona 85719 (520) 770-1789 Client: Report Date: January 10, 2007 New Rand Development Project: Chapala Project Attn: Randy Farris 12492 N La Canada PO Box 69056 Marana, AZ Oro Valley AZ 85737 Project No.: 63061212 Material Information Lab Test Data Project Requirements Optimum Max. Lab Water Dry Unit Water Minimum Dry Material Laboratory Content Weight Content Unit Weight No. Test Method Description and Classification N (pcf) N (% compaction) 1 612120007 ASTM D698-91 Native 12.5 118.9 95 min Field Test Data Test No. Test Location Utility Trench Backfill 1 5' N of Clean -out #1 2 25' S of Main Transfer Box Datum: Finished Subgrade -Comments: Test results on this report meet project specification. Field Test Method: ASTM D2922, ASTM D3017 Gauge ID: 31001 Terracon Rep: Tony Greene Report Distribution: {1) New Rand Development Probe Water Dry Unit Dry Unit Lift/ Mat. Depth Content Weight Weight Elev. No. (inches) N (pcf) (% compaction) -1.0 1 8 7.5 117.5 99 0.0 1 10 7.2 119.7 100+ Reviewed by: Z2; ' 5 Dave auf Department Manager II -Technical The tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use of the client indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written consent of our company. Test results transmitted herein are only applicable to the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical materials. Page 1 of 1 07d 07-Futon Key �FIELD DENSITY TESTING Irerracon eport Number: 63061212.0006 355 f ervice Date• October 24, 2006 TucSouth Euclid, suite 107 Tucson, Arizona 85719 (520) 770-1789 Client: Report Date: November 22, 2006 New Rand Development Project: Chapala Project Attn: Randy Farris 12492 N La Canada PO Box 69056 Marana, AZ Oro Valley AZ 85737 Project No.: 63061212 Material Information Lab Test Data Proiect Requirements Optimum Max. Lab Water Dry Unit Water Minimum Dry Material Laboratory Content Weight Content Unit Weight No. Test Method Description and Classification N (pcf) N (% compaction) -1 612120001 ASTM D698-91 Native 9.7 125.0 95 min Field Test Data Probe Water Dry Unit Dry Unit Test Lift/ Mat. Depth Content Weight Weight No. Test Location Elev. No. (inches) N (pcf) (% compaction) Waterline Backfill 1 Retest, 30' W of East End of Trench 0.0 1 8 6.0 123.8 99 Datum: Finished Subgrade :.,omments: Test results on this report meet project specification. Field Test Method: ASTM D2922, ASTM D3017 sGauge ID: 31001 -ferracon Rep: Tony Greene Report Distribution: K1) New Rand Development Reviewed by: D of Department Manager II -The tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use of the client indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written consent of our company. Test results transmitted herein are only applicable _o the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical -materials. Page 1 of 1 074R07-FNun Ks/ IIIIIELD DENSITY TESTING Irerracon I We rt N b 63061212 0005 po um V.a 355 South Euclid, Suite 107 Service Date: September 29, 2006 Tucson, Arizona 85719 (520) 770-1789 lient: Report Date: October 17, 2006 ew Rand Development Project: Chapala Project ttn: Randy Farris 12492 N La Canada O Box 69056 Marana, AZ Qro Valley AZ 85737 I Project No.: 63061212 Material Information Lab Test Data Proiect Requirements Optimum Max. Lab Water Dry Unit Water Minimum Dry Material Laboratory Content Weight Content Unit Weight No. Test Method Description and Classification N (pcf) N (% compaction) 612120001 ASTM D698-91 Native 9.7 125.0 95 min Field Test Data Vest No. Test Location Waterline Backfill 1 East-West Trench, Sta 12+75 Probe Lift/ Mat. Depth Elev. No. (inches) 0.0 1 8 Water Dry Unit Dry Unit Content Weight Weight N (pcf) (% compaction) 6.6 120.3 96 2 30' W of East End of Trench 0.0 1 8 5.6 109.3 87 atum: Finished Subgrade omments: An asterisk (*) appears next to test results which do NOT meet the project specifications. field Test Method: ASTM D2922, ASTM D3017 �auge ID: 31001 1 Ierracon Rep: Tony Greene :eport Distribution: ) New Rand Development Reviewed by: Da enauf Department Manager II he tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use of the client indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written consent of our company. Test results transmitted herein are only applicable =) the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical -iaterials. Page 1 of 1 07d 7-F—K.y (FIELD DENSITY TESTING Irerracon 4�e ort Number• 63061212.0003 355 South Euclid, suite 107 Service Date: September 19, 2006 Tucson, Arizona 85719 (520) 770-1789 Client: Report Date: October 09, 2006 New Rand Development Project: Chapala Project Attn: Randy Farris 12492 N La Canada PO Box 69056 Marana, AZ Oro Valley AZ 85737 Project No.: 63061212 Material Information Lab Test Data Project Requirements Optimum Max. Lab Water Dry Unit Water Minimum Dry Material Laboratory Content Weight Content Unit Weight No. Test Method Description and Classification N (pcf) N (% compaction) 1 612120001 ASTM D698-91 Native 9.7 125.0 95 min Field Test Data Probe Water Dry Unit Dry Unit Test Lift/ Mat. Depth Content Weight Weight No. Test Location Elev. No. (inches) N (pcf) (% compaction) Waterline Backfill 1 Sta 0+80, North to South Line Trench -1.0 1 6 7.8 116.0 93 Sewerline Backfill 2 Between Clean-out's 1 and 2 0.0 1 8 5.9 123.2 99 Datum: Finished Subgrade Comments: An asterisk (*) appears next to test results which do NOT meet the project specifications. Field Test Method: ASTM D2922, ASTM D3017 Terracon Rep: Tony Greene Report Distribution: (1) New Rand Development Reviewed by4-12 60b Department Manager II -The tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use of the client indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written consent of our company. Test results transmitted herein are only applicable �to the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical materials. Page 1 of 1 07 Flu -Forme hw 'ELD DENSITY TESTING Irerracon Report Number: 63061212.0004 355 f ervice Date: September 20, 2006 Tuc South Euclid, suite 107 Tucson, Arizona 85719 (520) 770-1789 Client: Report Date: October 10, 2006 New Rand Development Project: Chapala Project Attn: Randy Farris 12492 N La Canada PO Box 69056 Marana, AZ Oro Valley AZ 85737 Project No.: 63061212 Material Information Lab Test Data Project Requirements Optimum Max. Lab Water Dry Unit Water Minimum Dry Material Laboratory Content Weight Content Unit Weight No. Test Method Description and Classification N (pcf) N (% compaction) 1 612120001 ASTM D698-91 Native 9.7 125.0 95 min Field Test Data Test No. Test Location Waterline Backfill 1 Retest, Sta 0+80, North to South Line Trench Datum: Finished Subgrade IComments: Test results on this report meet project specification. Field Test Method: ASTM D2922, ASTM D3017 Gauge ID: 31001 Terracon Rep: Tony Greene Report Distribution: (1) New Rand Development Probe Lift/ Mat. Depth Elev. No. (inches) -1.0 1 6 Water Dry Unit Dry Unit Content Weight Weight N (pcf) (% compaction) 8.4 122.5 98 Reviewed bya.�2 ve nauf Department Manager II The tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use of the client indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written consent of our company. Test results transmitted herein are only applicable to the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical materials. Page 1 of 1 G__F _1—'.—