HomeMy WebLinkAboutPackets - Council Packets (12)
*AMENDED (3/1/16, 3:00 PM)
AGENDA
ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL
REGULAR SESSION
March 2, 2016
ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
11000 N. LA CAÑADA DRIVE
REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS
COUNCIL REPORTS
DEPARTMENT REPORTS
The Mayor and Council may consider and/or take action on the items listed below:
ORDER OF BUSINESS: MAYOR WILL REVIEW THE ORDER OF THE MEETING
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
1. FY 2015-16 2nd Quarter Public Safety Providers Reports
CALL TO AUDIENCE – At this time, any member of the public is allowed to address the Mayor and
Town Council on any issue not listed on today’s agenda. Pursuant to the Arizona Open Meeting Law,
individual Council Members may ask Town Staff to review the matter, ask that the matter be placed on a
future agenda, or respond to criticism made by speakers. However, the Mayor and Council may not
discuss or take legal action on matters raised during “Call to Audience.” In order to speak during “Call to
Audience” please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card.
CONSENT AGENDA
(Consideration and/or possible action)
A. Minutes - February 3, 2016
B. Resolution No. (R)16-10, authorizing a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Pima
Association of Governments (PAG) and the Town of Oro Valley for programming and funding
of La Cañada Drive/Moore Road intersection study (TIP ID No. 19.15)
C. Request for approval of an amended Final Plat for the Innovation Corporate Center, located on
the northeast corner of Innovation Park Drive and Vistoso Park Road
D. *Cancellation of the March 16, 2016 regular Town Council meeting
REGULAR AGENDA
1. PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING AN
APPLICATION FOR A SERIES 12 (RESTAURANT) LIQUOR LICENSE FOR
SMASHBURGER #4, LOCATED AT 7625 N. ORACLE RD. #145
2. *PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING AN
APPLICATION FOR A SERIES 7 (BEER & WINE BAR) AND SERIES 12 (RESTAURANT)
LIQUOR LICENSE FOR GASLIGHT MUSIC HALL, LOCATED AT 13005 N. ORACLE RD.
#110
3. FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 MID-YEAR FINANCIAL UPDATE
4. RESOLUTION NO. (R)16-11, PROVIDING NOTICE OF INTENT TO DECREASE THE
EQUIVALENT RESIDENTIAL UNIT (ERU) AS DEFINED IN THE STORMWATER SECTION
OF THE TOWN CODE THEREBY INDIRECTLY INCREASING THE RATES FOR
COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES FOR THE ORO VALLEY STORMWATER UTILITY
5. RESOLUTION NO. (R)16-12, PROVIDING NOTICE OF INTENT TO INCREASE
STORMWATER UTILITY BASE RATE FOR THE ORO VALLEY STORMWATER UTILITY
6. PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE NO. (O)16-03, AMENDING SECTION 22.5 OF THE ORO
VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED RELATED TO THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
REVIEW CRITERIA
7. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE DIRECTION TO STAFF TO PREPARE
A REPORT OUTLINING THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MAIN STREET AND YOUR VOICE,
OUR FUTURE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
8. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE DIRECTION REGARDING THE INSTALLATION OF
ADDITIONAL SWINGS AT RIVERFRONT PARK
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS (The Council may bring forth general topics for future meeting agendas.
Council may not discuss, deliberate or take any action on the topics presented pursuant to ARS
38-431.02H)
CALL TO AUDIENCE – At this time, any member of the public is allowed to address the Mayor and
Town Council on any issue not listed on today’s agenda. Pursuant to the Arizona Open Meeting Law,
individual Council Members may ask Town Staff to review the matter, ask that the matter be placed on a
future agenda, or respond to criticism made by speakers. However, the Mayor and Council may not
discuss or take legal action on matters raised during “Call to Audience.” In order to speak during “Call to
Audience” please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card.
ADJOURNMENT
POSTED: 2/24/16 at 5:00 p.m. by mrs
AMENDED AGENDA POSTED: 3/1/16 at 5:00 p.m. by mrs
When possible, a packet of agenda materials as listed above is available for public inspection at least 24
hours prior to the Council meeting in the office of the Town Clerk between the hours of 8:00 a.m. –
5:00p.m.
The Town of Oro Valley complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If any person with a
disability needs any type of accommodation, please notify the Town Clerk’s Office at least five days prior
to the Council meeting at 229-4700.
INSTRUCTIONS TO SPEAKERS
Members of the public have the right to speak during any posted public hearing. However, those
items not listed as a public hearing are for consideration and action by the Town Council during
the course of their business meeting. Members of the public may be allowed to speak on these
topics at the discretion of the Chair.
If you wish to address the Town Council on any item(s) on this agenda, please complete a speaker card
located on the Agenda table at the back of the room and give it to the Town Clerk. Please indicate on
the speaker card which item number and topic you wish to speak on, or if you wish to speak
during “Call to Audience”, please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue
speaker card.
Please step forward to the podium when the Mayor announces the item(s) on the agenda which you are
interested in addressing.
1. For the record, please state your name and whether or not you are a Town resident.
2. Speak only on the issue currently being discussed by Council. Please organize your speech, you will
only be allowed to address the Council once regarding the topic being discussed.
3. Please limit your comments to 3 minutes.
4. During “Call to Audience” you may address the Council on any issue you wish.
5. Any member of the public speaking must speak in a courteous and respectful manner to those present.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Town Council Regular Session Item # 1.
Meeting Date:03/02/2016
Submitted By:Arinda Asper, Town Manager's Office
Information
Subject
FY 2015-16 2nd Quarter Public Safety Providers Reports
Attachments
GRFD Quarterly Reports
MVFD Quarterly Reports
OVPD Quarterly Reports
Golder Ranch Fire District -Oro Valley
Call Summary
2 nd Quarter FY 2015-2016 (Oct. -Dec. 2015)
Sun City Station 374 # of calls 0/0
Di spatc h to A t Scene <5:00 minute s -EMS 2 16 63%
Di spatc h to At Scene <6:00 minutes -FIRE 3 100 %
Average Dispatch to At Scene Time 4:35
Woodburne Station 375 # of calls DID
Di s pa tch to At Scene <5:00 minutes -EMS 4 36 54%
Di s pa tch to A t Scene <6:00 minutes -FIRE 3 33%
Averal!;e Dispatch to At Scene Time 4:50
Lambert Station 376 # of calls 0/0
Di spatch to At Scene <5:00 minutes -EMS 160 64 %
Di spa tch to At Scene <6:00 minute s -FIRE 2 0%
Average Di s patch to At Scene Time 4:39
Oracle Rd. Station 377 # of calls %
Di spatc h to At Scene <5:00 minutes -EMS 247 7 0%
Di spatch to At Scene <6:00 minutes -FIRE 0 0%
Average Dispatch to At Scene Time 4:06
Averal!;e Total All Oro Valley Stations # of calls 0/0
Di s pat c h to At Sc e ne <5:00 minutes -EMS 10 59 63%
Di s patch to At Scene <6:00 minutes -FIRE 8 44%
Average Dispatch to At Scene Time 4:31
Average Total All Oro Valley Stations _2nd Fire Unit # of calls DI D
2nd Fire U nit Di spa tch to At Sce ne <8:00 minutes -FIRE 6 t 66 %
Average Dispatch to At Sce ne Time for 2 nd Fire U nit 7:22
•
Golder Ranch Fire District -Oro Valley
Detailed Fire Response Report
2 nd Quarter FY 2015-2016 (Oct. -Dec. 2015)
Date Call# Type Disp. Time Unit Respond On-scene Total Resp. Time
11 /6115 29688 HOUSE 0 1 :09 :50 LT375 0 1:11:17 01:17:0 3 7:13
SI.375 EN3 74 01:10 :34 01 :18:20 8:30
C a llin g pa rty is th e re s ident reporting flame s coming from the roof. Fire place wa s used for th e fir st time
and it appa rent l),spread into the 2nd floor and attic area . WORKING FIRE.
Date Call # Type Disp. time Unit Respond On-scene Total Resp. Time
11113115 30480 HOUSE 17:09:28 EN376 17: I 0:38 17 :17 :15 7:47
SI.376 EN330 17:10 :23 17 :18 :26 8:58
Reported as a fir e in the ups tairs bathroom of a res idence . It was discovered that the fir e wa s started by a
juven il e who lit vario us items in the bathroom. No s tructural fire invol vement -contained only to
bathroom content s. NEGATIVE IN C ID EN T.
Date Call # Type Disp. time Unit Respond On-scene Total Resp. Time
11116115 30776 HO USE 18:00:40 EN376 18:02:16 18 :07:39 6:59
St.375
Re s id ent jus t s tarted fireplace for the first time a nd advi sed that the mante l wa s ve ry hot. EN376 ad vise d
th at nothing wa s showin g up o n aIT iva l. It wa s found that the flu to th e fire place wa s clo sed and other
res pond in g uni ts co uld cancel. NEG A TIVE IN CIDENT.
Date Call # Type Disp. time Unit Respond On-scene Total Resp. Time
11/28 11 5 31958 BUILD 07 :06:24 EN374 07:07 : 16 07:11:54 5:30
St.374 EN370 07:06:49 07:13:59 7:35
F ir e a larm going off at the Wa1green s . Upon exten sive in vestigatio n, nothin g wa s fo un d. NEGAT IV E
INCIDENT.
Date Call # Type Disp. time Unit Respond On-scene Total Resp. Time
11 13 0115 32 204 HO USE 18:09:44 EN 374 18:10:50 18:15 :57' 7:13*
St.374
Caller wa s a ne ighbo r that see s s mok e coming from a hou se but is uns ur e of the ex act addre ss. After
searc hin g th e a re a, EN 374 find s a ho me th a t was cookin g o utsid e that produced smoke . Ot her
re s pondin g unit s can cancel. N EGATIV E INC ID EN T . Beca use the ca ll wa s "in the a rea of' w ill not
co unt a gain st re spon se times.
Date Call # Type Disp. time Unit Respond On-scene Total Resp. Time
12171 15 3283 1 HO USE 02:53:43 EN376 EN376 03:00:2 0 6 :37
St.376 LD375 LD375 03:00 :57 7:14
Call er is a ne ig hb or th at reports see in g what appears to be s moke and flame s f rom a home th at is
un occ upi e d. Afte r in vest igati o n, not hin g was loc a te d. NEGATIVE INC ID ENT
Date Call # Type Disp. time Unit Respond On-scene Total Res p . Time
12/22115 34 34 1 HO USE II :30:43 EN377 II :30:57 I I :35:39 4:56
SI.375 LD375 11 :3 1:14 11:36:3 1 5:48
Ne ig hb o r is re portin g w hat appears to be a hou se on fir e producing bl ac k s moke. EN377 on sce ne w ith a
motorcycle fir e now out. EN377, LD375 can hand le . NEGATIVE IN C ID ENT.
Date Call # Type Disp. time Unit Respond On-scene Total Rcsp. Time
12 /28115 3 490 3 BUILD 13:0 1:4 7 EN370 13 :02:12 13 :0 5 :5 1 4:04
SI.374 EN374 13 :02:33 13 :08:05 6:18
Reported as odor of s moke / electri ca l in s ide a doctor 's office s uite . Nothin g s howing upon arr ival.
After inve sti gati o n, it was d et e rmin ed to be a fault y HV AC unit. NEGATIVE INCIDENT.
Golder Ranch -Oro Valley Call Load Breakdown
October-December 2015
2nd Quarter FY 2015-2016
CALL TYPE
Aircraft
Brush! Vegetation
Bui lding
Electrical! Motor
Fires -All Other
Gas Leak
Hazmat
Trash ! Rubish
Unauthorized Burning
Vehicle
Total Fire Calls
I
Animal Problem
Animal Rescue
Assist -Other
Battery Change
Bee Swarm
Defective Appliance
Invalid Assist
Snake
Lockout
Fire Now Out
Total Service Calls
I
Alarms (Fire, Smoke. CO)
Cancelled! Negat iv e In cident
Smoke! Odor In vestagation
Total Good Intent Calls
I
Motor Vehic le Accident
Rescue (high , trench , water)
All Other EMS Incidents
Total EMS Type Calls
I
TOTAL ALL CALLS
Sun City
1
1
2
31
11
2
42
74
1
161
9
7
4
20
2
214
216
399
Final Type Reference
Woodburne L ambert
1
1 2
2 1
1 2
1
6 5
43 36
14 3
3
37 31
113 90
3
1 3
208 169
11 9
9 14
6 3
26 26
16 15
420 145
436 160
676 360
O r acle ,-TOTAL
1
1 1
2 6
4 8
2 5
1
9 22
I
20 130
13 41
3
2
26 136
67 344
2 5
1 6
129 667
I
10 39
16 46
2 15
28 100
I
14 47
233 1012
247 1059
I
413 '-1848
Golder Ranch Fire District -2nd Quarter FY 2015-2016 (Oct. -Dec. 2015) Oro Valley Summary Report
All GRFD Oro Valley Stations Time #of Calls Adopted Standard % Actual % Description of Variance
Dispatch to At Scene -FIRE I < 6:00 8 90 % 44 %
Time to achieve Adopted Standard of 90% 7 :13
Average Dispatch to At Scene Time 6 :0 1
-
Dispatch to At Scene -EMS I < 5:00 90 % 65 % Small , winding streets
Time to achieve Adopted Standard of 90% 6 :24 Distance from station
Getting fuel at time of call
Residentail streets wi th man y sto p signs
Lo cated o n top of hill
Average Dispatch to At Scene Time 4 :31
2nd Fire Unit Dispatch to At Scene < 8:00 6 90% 66%
Time to achieve Adopted Standard of 90% 830
Average Dispatch to At Scene Time 7:22
Mountain Vista Fire District -Oro Valley
Priority Call Summary
Second Quarter Oct-Dec FY15-16
Station 610 (Magee Rd.) # of calls %
Dispatch to At Scene <6:00 minutes -EMS 54
Di s patch to At Scene <6:00 minutes -FIRE 2
Average Dispatch to At Scene Time 4:11
Station 620 (Shannon Rd.) # of calls %
Di s patch to At Scene <6:00 minutes -EMS 0
Di s patch to At Scene <6:00 minutes -FIRE 0
Average Dispatch to At Scene Time nla
Average Total All Oro Valley Stations # of calls %
Di sp atc h to At Scene <6:00 minutes -EMS 54
Dispatch to At Scene <6:00 minutes -FIRE 2
Average Dispatch to At Scene Time 4:11
Average Total All Oro Vallev Stations _2 nd Fire Unit # of calls 0/.
2nd Fire Unit Di s patch to At Scene <8:00 minutes -FIRE 0 I
Average Dispatch to At Scene Time for 2"d Fire Unit nla
95%
100 %
nla
nla
95%
100 %
nla
Mountain Vista Fire District -Oro Valley
Detailed Priority Fire Response Report
Second Quarter Oct-Dec FY15-16
Date Call # Type Disp. Time Unit Respond On-scene Total Resp. Time
11 115 /20 15 N 153 19009 1 A PT S 22 :33:48 EN6 10 22:35:53 22:38:49 0 :05 :01
St. 6 10
E n g ine 610 res po nd e d priority for a reported apartment fir e. Upon invest igat ion , E ng in e 6 10 found burnt
food conta ined to a cook in g pot. Nl:.<iA riVE INCIDENT.
Date Call# Type Disp. Time Unit Respond On-scene Total Resp. Time
12/02 /2015 N 153360 029 ELEe 10:08:34 EN6 10 10:10:10 10 :13:11 0:04:37
St. 610
Eng ine 6 10 was di s patched to a fire in a s tructure ; Eng in e 6 10 found a clothes drye r wit h an int ern a l
e lec trica l fir e w h ich was extin g ui s hed prior to Eng in e 6 10 a rri va l. NECiA riVE INCIDENT.
Mountain Vista Fire District -Oro Valley Call Load Breakdown
Priority & Non-priority Calls
Oc t-Dec F Y 15-16 2nd O TR
C ALL TYPE MVFD
Aircraft
Bru s h I Veaetation
Buildino 1
Electrical I Motor 2
Fires -All Other
Gas Leak
Hazmat
Trash I Rubi s h
Unauth orized Burnino
V ehicle
Total Fire Calls 3
Animal Problem
Animal Rescue
Assist -Other 2
Battery ChanQe
Bee Swarm
Defective ADDIiance
Invalid Assist 9
Snake 7
Lockout
Fire Now Out
Total Service Calls 18
Alarms (Fire, Smoke. COl 9
Cancelled I NeQative Incident
Smoke I Odor Investaqation 2
Total Good Intent Calls 11
Motor Vehicle Accident 10
Rescue (hioh, trench, water)
All Other EMS Incidents 90
Total EMS Type Calls 100
TOTAL ALL CALLS 132
Mountain Vista Fire District -Second Quarter FY15-16 -Oro Valley Report Summary
All MVFD Oro Valley Stations Time #of Calls Adopted Standard % Actual % Description of Variance
Dispatch to At Scene -FIRE I < 6 :00 2 90% 100%
Time to achieve Ado ted Standard of 90%
Average Dispatch to At Scene Time 4 :4 9
Dispatch to At Scene -EMS < 6 :00 54 90 % 9 5% De lay 1 due to inco rr ec t add ressin Q,
Time to achieve Ado ted Standard of 90 % Delay 2 due to mul tiple calls
Delav 3 due to aw ay fro m area doin g prepl an nin
Average Dispatch to At Scene Time 4 :09
2nd Fire Unit Dispatch to At Scene < 8 :00 0 90% nfa
Time to achieve Ado ted Standard of 90 %
Av erage Dispatch to At Scene Time nfa
The Oro Valley Police Department Crime Analyst has been on
medical leave for an extended period of time.
The Police Department will provide the 2nd Quarter statistics
along with the 3rd Quarter statistics on the next Public Safety
Quarterly Report to Town Council.
Town Council Regular Session Item # A.
Meeting Date:03/02/2016
Requested by: Julie Bower Submitted By:Mike Standish, Town
Clerk's Office
Department:Town Clerk's Office
Information
SUBJECT:
Minutes - February 3, 2016
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
N/A
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to approve, (approve with the following changes) the February 3, 2016 minutes.
Attachments
2/3/16 Draft Minutes
2/3/16 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 1
MINUTES
ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL
REGULAR SESSION
February 3, 2016
ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE
REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 5:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Hiremath called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:Satish Hiremath, Mayor
Lou Waters, Vice Mayor
Joe Hornat, Councilmember
Mary Snider, Councilmember
ABSENT:Brendan Burns, Councilmember
Bill Garner, Councilmember
Mike Zinkin, Councilmember
EXECUTIVE SESSION - Pursuant to ARS 38-431.03(A)(1) Personnel matters - Police
Chief’s annual performance review
MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Snider and seconded by Vice Mayor
Waters to go into Executive Session at 5:01 p.m. pursuant to ARS 38-431.03(A)(1)
Personnel matters regarding the Police Chief's annual performance review.
MOTION carried, 4-0.
Mayor Hiremath said the following staff members would join Council in Executive
Session: Acting Town Manager Stacey Lemos, Town Attorney Gary Verburg, Chief of
Police Danny Sharp and Town Clerk Julie Bower.
REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Hiremath called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
2/3/16 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 2
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:Satish Hiremath, Mayor
Lou Waters, Vice Mayor
Brendan Burns, Councilmember
Bill Garner, Councilmember
Joe Hornat, Councilmember
Mary Snider, Councilmember
Mike Zinkin, Councilmember
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Hiremath led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance.
UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS
Communications Administrator Misti Nowak announced the upcoming Town meetings
and events.
COUNCIL REPORTS
Vice Mayor Waters reported that the Town had initiated a campaign to form a
community music group which included anyone with musical talent, interest or
ambitions. The second meeting was scheduled for Monday, February 15 at 5:00 p.m. at
the Community Center and all interested residents were encouraged to attend.
DEPARTMENT REPORTS
Town Clerk Julie Bower announced that new artwork was on display in the Council
Chambers by artist James Capo.
ORDER OF BUSINESS
Mayor Hiremath reviewed the order of business and said the agenda would stand as
posted.
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
1.Councilmember Hornat - 2016 ULI Trends Day Conference Trip Report
2.Letter of Appreciation -Building Department Staff
CALL TO AUDIENCE
2/3/16 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 3
Oro Valley resident Don Bristow spoke about Oro Valley's Main Street concept, more
commonly known as "The District", and was concerned that the Your Voice, Our Future
actions were being implemented by staff prior to citizen's acceptance of the General
Plan.
Oro Valley resident and Oro Valley Police Department Sergeant Steve Sickelbower said
he was involved in an on-duty patrol vehicle accident on January 22, 2016 in which his
Chevy Tahoe sustained major damage and full airbag deployment but his injuries only
consisted of abrasions, lacerations and whiplash due to the safety of the Chevy
Tahoe. Sergeant Sickelbower thanked Mayor and Council for approving the purchase
of the extraordinarily safe Chevy Tahoe.
PRESENTATIONS
1.Proclamation - Death with Dignity Day
Mayor Hiremath proclaimed Monday, February 8, 2016 as Death with Dignity Day and
urged all citizens to show their support for the aid in dying legislation that was currently
pending in the Arizona State Legislature.
Diane Uhl and Sanda Schuldmann, volunteers for Compassion & Choices, thanked the
Mayor and Council for meeting with them and supporting the Death with Dignity
initiative.
2.Proclamation - National Wear Red Day
Mayor Hiremath proclaimed Saturday, February 6, 2016 as National Wear Red Day and
urged all citizens to show their support for women and the fight against heart disease by
commemorating this day by the wearing of the color red.
Golder Ranch Fire District Fire Chief, Randy Karrer, accepted the proclamation and
thanked the Mayor and Council for supporting the fight against heart disease.
3.Presentation - Community Hero Award to retired Oro Valley Police Officer Shawn
Benjamin
Fire Chief Karrer, Golder Ranch Fire District Community Relations Manager Anne-Marie
Braswell and Oro Valley Police Chief Danny Sharp presented retired Oro Valley Police
Officer Shawn Benjamin with a Community Hero Award for performing CPR on an
individual at Panera Bakery saving the individual's life. Chief Karrer invited the public to
attend their next board meeting on Tuesday, February 9, 2016 at which Ms. Benjamin
would be honored by the Golder Ranch Fire District for her heroic actions.
4.Presentation from Arizona Department of Transportation updating the Town of Oro
Valley on the current status of State Route 77, Oracle Road Widening Project
2/3/16 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 4
Jeremy Moore, ADOT Assistant District Engineer for Construction, presented a status
update regarding State Route 77 improvements and outlined the following:
-Project Overview
-Project Improvements
-Wildlife Crossings
-Schedule Update
Discussion ensued amongst Council and Mr. Moore regarding the Oracle Road
Widening Project.
CONSENT AGENDA
Councilmember Zinkin requested to remove Consent Agenda items (C-E) for
discussion.
Councilmember Garner requested to remove Consent Agenda item (G) for discussion.
A.Minutes - January 20, 2016
B.Cancellation of the February 17, 2016 regular Town Council meeting
F.Resolution No. (R)16-06, authorizing and approving a subgrantee agreement
between the Town of Oro Valley and the Arizona Department of Homeland
Security to fund overtime and mileage under the Operation Stonegarden program
H.Resolution No. (R)16-08, authorizing and approving Amendment Number 3 to the
Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) between the Regional Transportation
Authority of Pima County and the Town of Oro Valley for provision of circulator
bus service
I.Resolution No. (R)16-09, authorizing and approving an Intergovernmental
Agreement between Pima County and the Town of Oro Valley for the joint
administration of Public Works Capital Improvement Projects
MOTION:A motion was made by Vice Mayor Waters and seconded by Councilmember
Snider to approve Consent Agenda items (A-B), (F) and (H-I).
MOTION carried, 7-0.
C.Appointment to the Board of Adjustment (BOA)
Councilmember Zinkin thanked all of the residents who applied for the BOA vacancy
and said that he was looking forward to working with Mr. Perkins.
2/3/16 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 5
MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Zinkin and seconded by
Councilmember Hornat to approve item (C).
MOTION carried, 7-0.
D.Visit Tucson Quarterly Report: October 1, 2015 -December 31, 2015
Councilmember Zinkin was concerned with the funding levels stipulated in the Town's
Financial Participation Agreement (FPA) with Visit Tucson.
Brent DeRaad, President & CEO of Visit Tucson, spoke to the funding levels and return
on investment estimates for the Town.
Discussion ensued amongst Council and Mr. DeRaad regarding the Visit Tucson
Quarterly Report.
MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Zinkin and seconded by
Councilmember Garner to approve item (D).
MOTION carried, 7-0.
E.Greater Oro Valley Chamber of Commerce Quarterly Report: October 1, 2015
- December 31, 2015
Councilmember Zinkin spoke about the Greater Oro Valley Chamber of Commerce
funding from the Town and inquired as to what the Town received from the Chamber in
return.
Dave Perry, President and CEO of the Greater Oro Valley Chamber of Commerce,
outlined the various activities performed by the Chamber that benefitted the Town of
Oro Valley.
Discussion ensued amongst Council and Mr. Perry regarding the Greater Oro Valley
Chamber of Commerce Quarterly Report.
MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Zinkin and seconded by Vice Mayor
Waters to approve item (E).
MOTION carried, 7-0.
G.Resolution No. (R)16-07, authorizing and approving a subgrantee agreement
between the Town of Oro Valley and the Arizona Department of Homeland
Security to fund the purchase of hand-held thermal imaging equipment and
night vision helmet mounts and transfer arms under the Operation
Stonegarden program
2/3/16 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 6
Councilmember Garner inquired as to what specific equipment would be purchased
through the subgrantee agreement.
Oro Valley Police Department Commander Jason Larter said the agreement was for
thermal imaging and night vision equipment only.
MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Garner and seconded by Vice Mayor
Waters to approve item (G).
MOTION carried, 7-0.
REGULAR AGENDA
1.DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE DIRECTION REGARDING THE SIGN CODE
AMENDMENT RELATED TO SIGNS IN THE RIGHT-OF WAY
Zoning Plans Examiner Patty Hayes presented item #1 and outlined the following:
-Purpose
-State Law Supersedes Zoning
-Oro Valley Allowed Sign Types
-Content Neutral
Development and Infrastructure Services Director Paul Keesler presented item #1 and
outlined the following:
-Options
-Allow All Signs in the Right-of-Way
-Prohibit All Signs in the Right-of-Way
-Middle Ground
-Focus on One or More Sign Types
-Limit Time, Place, Quantity
Discussion ensued amongst Council regarding a possible sign code amendment related
to signs in the right-of-way.
The Town Council directed staff to take a wait and see approach as to the Town of
Gilbert litigation and continue to update Council on the status of the right-of-way sign
legislation through Council Reports.
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Councilmember Zinkin requested a future agenda item to be placed on the March 2,
2016 Town Council agenda to discuss and clarify the difference between Main Street
and Your Voice, Our Future, seconded by Councilmember Garner.
2/3/16 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 7
CALL TO AUDIENCE
No comments were received.
ADJOURNMENT
MOTION:A motion was made by Vice Mayor Waters and seconded by Councilmember
Snider to adjourn the meeting at 7:27 p.m.
MOTION carried, 7-0.
Prepared by:
_________________________
Michael Standish
Deputy Town Clerk
I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of
the regular session of the Town of Oro Valley Council of Oro Valley, Arizona held on the
3rd day of February, 2016. I further certify that the meeting was duly called and held
and that a quorum was present.
Dated this ____ day of _______________________, 2016.
__________________________
Julie K. Bower, MMC
Town Clerk
Town Council Regular Session Item # B.
Meeting Date:03/02/2016
Requested by: Jose Rodriguez
Submitted By:Aimee Ramsey, Development Infrastructure Services
Department:Development Infrastructure Services
Information
SUBJECT:
Resolution No. (R)16-10, authorizing a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between
Pima Association of Governments (PAG) and the Town of Oro Valley for programming
and funding of La Cañada Drive/Moore Road intersection study (TIP ID No. 19.15)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The Memorandum of Understanding is necessary to fund and incorporate the safety
study project into the PAG’s five-year Regional Transportation Improvement Program
(TIP). Staff submitted an application requesting funds for a safety study at the
intersection of Moore Road and La Cañada Drive in the amount of $50,000 during PAG’s
annual call for projects for FY 2016/17 TIP. The safety study and its funding amount
were eventually approved by the TIP subcommittee and will be included in the proposed
transportation capital projects in the upcoming FY 2017/21 TIP. However, before the
study can be included in the TIP, PAG recently adopted a new policy that requires all
projects to have an MOU in place before they can be approved in the final TIP. The
MOU is to ensure that all stakeholders have the same understanding of the project that
will be delivered.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
On August 14, 2015, PAG sent out a call for projects (application proposals) to member
jurisdictions for the FY 2017/21 TIP. In response, Town staff submitted a project
application for a safety study at the intersection of Moore Road and La Cañada Drive
requesting $50,000 of Project Development Activity Funds (PDAF). The project consists
of performing a safety study to evaluate the existing conditions at the intersection,
including identification of problems as well as presenting respective solutions. The study
will take into account the high growth rate at the vicinity of the intersection resulting in
the presentation of options for future traffic control improvements. The Town’s safety
study project was ranked along with other project proposals from other member
jurisdictions and was eventually approved by the TIP sub-committee for funding in the
FY 2017/21 TIP. The next step in the PAG’s five-year TIP process is to have public
involvement or input via three public open houses, which are tentatively scheduled in
March of 2016. After the public outreach, the FY 2017/21 TIP will then be forwarded to
PAG's Regional Council for approval in May which will make the funds available July 1,
2016. The MOU is required to ensure regional PAG funding for the safety study at Moore
Road and La Cañada Drive.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The $50,000 funding for the safety study is provided through the PAG’s Project
Development Activity Fund (PDAF). Should the MOU be approved, the project
expenditures and associated reimbursements will be included in the FY 2017 budget
request.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to (approve / deny) Resolution No. (R)16-10, authorizing a Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) between Pima Association of Governments (PAG) and the Town
of Oro Valley for funding a safety study at the intersection of Moore Road and La Cañada
Drive.
Attachments
(R)16-10 PAG MOU La Canada Dr. and Moore Road Intersection
MOU
C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 6\@BCL@5817E977\@BCL@5817E977.doc Town of Oro Valley Atty’s Office/ca/120309
RESOLUTION NO. (R)16-10
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING A
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) BETWEEN THE
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY AND PIMA ASSOCIATION OF
GOVERNMENTS (PAG) FOR PROGRAMMING AND FUNDING
OF LA CANADA DRIVE/MOORE ROAD INTERSECTION
STUDY
WHEREAS, the Town desires to enter into a Memorandum of Agreement with Pima
Association of Governments (PAG) for programming and funding of the La Canada
Drive/Moore Road Intersection Study; and
WHEREAS, this Memorandum of Agreement is necessary to fund and incorporate the
safety study project into the PAG’s five-year Regional Transportation Improvement
Program (TIP); and
WHEREAS,funding for the safety study, which is in the amount of $50,000, is provided
through the PAG’s Project Development Activity Fund
WHEREAS, it is in the interest of the Town to enter into the Memorandum of
Agreement with Pima Association of Governments (PAG) for programming and funding
of the La Canada Drive/Moore Road Intersection Study.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council of the Town
of Oro Valley, Arizona, that:
1. The Memorandum of Understanding, attached hereto as Exhibit “A”, between the
Town of Oro Valley and Pima Association of Governments (PAG) for
programming and funding of the La Canada Drive/Moore Road Intersection Study
is hereby authorized and approved.
2. The Development and Infrastructure Services Director and any other
administrative officials of the Town of Oro Valley are hereby authorized to take
steps as necessary to execute and implement the terms of the MOU.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley,
Arizona, this 2
nd day of March, 2016.
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
Dr. Satish I. Hiremath, Mayor
C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 6\@BCL@5817E977\@BCL@5817E977.doc Town of Oro Valley Attorney’s Office/ca/080709
ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie K. Bower, Town Clerk Tobin Sidles, Legal Services Director
Date: Date:
C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 6\@BCL@5817E977\@BCL@5817E977.doc Town of Oro Valley Attorney’s Office/ca/080709
EXHIBIT “A”
PAG MOU Form 02/02/15 1
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
BETWEEN
PIMA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
AND
THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
FOR
PROGRAMMING AND FUNDING OF
LA CANADA / MOORE INTERSECTION STUDY (TIP ID 19.15)
This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is entered into by and between Pima Association of
Governments (PAG), the designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for Pima
County, and The Town of Oro Valley, a body politic and corporate of the State of Arizona (“the
Lead Agency”).
RECITALS
A. 23 U.S.C 134 (b) establishes Metropolitan Planning Organizations in urban areas over
50,000 in population. Additionally, urbanized areas over 200,000 in population are
considered Transportation Management Areas (TMA) that require the MPO to
incorporate additional requirements into the planning process as outlined in 23 USC 134
(k).
B. The governing board of the MPO is composed of representatives of each member of the
regional jurisdictional governments in accordance with 23 USC 134 (d).
C. PAG as the MPO is required to annually develop a Transportation Improvement Program
(TIP) in accordance with 23 USC 134 (j).
D. PAG, as part of the regional planning process throughout 23 USC 134 is required to
ensure projects identified in the TIP are making satisfactory progress toward completion,
have the necessary funding commitments to be completed within the timeframe published
in the TIP and that completed projects are reported on using a performance based
planning process.
E. Publication of the PAG TIP document authorizes the obligation of federal funding
(expenditure of federal funds obligated for this Project on or after May 29, 2015 is
subject to the terms and conditions of this MOU) and/or authorizes the drawdown of state
PAG HURF 12.6% funds to projects that are programmed in the “current” fiscal year of
the document.
F. The Town of Oro Valley has been identified as the Lead Agency for the La Canada /
Moore Intersection Study and will be responsible for all aspects of Project
implementation including, but not limited to, planning, Project management, risk
management, design, right of way acquisition, construction, advertisement, award,
execution and administration of the design and construction contracts for the Project.
PAG MOU Form 02/02/15 2
G. The Lead Agency is authorized by ARS Section 9-276 to design, maintain, control and
manage public roads within the Lead Agency’s jurisdictional boundaries.
H. The Lead Agency is authorized under A.R.S. § 28-6701 to establish, construct, and
maintain highways and related improvements in Pima County within municipal
boundaries. The Lead Agency may, when authorized by law, have a legal contract with
one or more jurisdictions to perform roadway and other improvements within the
boundaries of the other jurisdiction or jurisdictions.
I.The Lead Agency and PAG wish to cooperate in the programming and funding for the
La Canada / Moore Intersection Study (“the Project”). This Project is identified in the
PAG TIP with the TIP ID# of 19.15
J.It is the policy of PAG to require that the Lead Agency be identified and a
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) be approved and entered into by PAG and the
Lead Agency before the Project can advance into the first or second year of the TIP
document.
K. The PAG TIP Policies and Procedures document will apply to the programming process
for this Project unless otherwise specified herein.
L. This Project has been identified to add value to the stated goals and objectives of the
adopted regional transportation plan, as such it must meet and comply with its obligations
to the region.
NOW, THEREFORE,the Town of Oro Valley and PAG, pursuant to the above and in
consideration of the matters and things set forth herein, do mutually understand as follows:
UNDERSTANDING
1. Purpose.The purpose of this MOU is to set forth the responsibilities of the parties for the
design, construction, maintenance and operation of the Project and to address various legal and
administrative matters among the parties.
2. Project.The project consists of performing a safety study to evaluate the existing traffic
conditions at the intersection of La Canada Drive and Moore Road and identify problems and
present solutions respectively, as more fully depicted in the attached Exhibit A, including the
following:
a) Detailed Project scope and schedule, including a description of how the Project will
benefit the PAG region.
b) PAG TIP ID# Number
c) Project budget and cost breakdown by phase
d) Total amount of regional funding programmed for the Project plus a breakdown of any
other funding available to complete the project.
e) Designation of Project phases, if applicable, and any additional related agreements.
f) Estimated construction start date and duration of construction.
g) Projected timeline.
h) Identification of a Project contact for the Lead Agency
PAG MOU Form 02/02/15 3
i) For non-programmatic projects, the scope should list (at a minimum) all Project features
and categories that will be identified in the project’s base info page in the TIP database.
The jurisdictions are encouraged to list additional Project features as well.
j) For programmatic expenditures, the scope should include anticipated deliverables and
outcomes, such as number of meetings or outreach events, or number of participants
reached.
2. Operations and Maintenance. The Lead Agency will identify the cost and funding source
for operations and maintenance of the completed project.
3. Effective Date; Term. This MOU shall become effective upon approval of this MOU by the
PAG Regional Council and the Lead Agency and shall continue in effect until all improvements
constructed pursuant to this MOU are completed, all eligible reimbursement payments to the
Lead Agency are concluded, and all warranties applicable to the Project have expired.
4. Responsibilities of the Lead Agency.
a. The Lead Agency shall be responsible for the implementation of the Project in
accordance with this MOU and all applicable public roadway, traffic signal, and street
lighting design and construction standards. Design Standards are federal, state, county
or municipal standards for engineering, traffic, safety or public works facilities
design. Examples of Design Standards include the American Association of State
Highway and Transportation Officials and Federal Highway Administration standards
for highway engineering and construction, the Pima Association of Governments
Standard Specifications for Public Improvements, the Pima County Roadway Design
Manual, the Pima County Department of Transportation /City of Tucson Department
of Transportation Pavement Marking Design Manual, and Pima County and
municipal design guidelines for roadway lane widths and level of drainage protection.
b. If any parties other than the Lead Agency are contracted to perform any portion of the
Project, the Lead Agency shall be responsible for the contracts for design,
construction, or any other professional services for the Project and shall select the
consultants and contractors to be used on the Project. The Lead Agency shall follow
all local, regional, state or federal requirements applicable to the funding being used,
including selection and contracting for services.
c. The Lead Agency shall be responsible for all traffic management, including public
notification, during Project implementation when required.
d. For construction projects, the Lead Agency shall operate and maintain the
improvements during and after completion of construction except where those
responsibilities have been agreed to by another agency or jurisdiction.
e. The final cost of the Project shall be that amount necessary to complete the Project
including any work incorporated into the Project by change orders and amendments
executed by the Lead Agency. The Lead Agency shall be responsible for all Project
costs in excess of the regional funds identified in the TIP document.
PAG MOU Form 02/02/15 4
f. The Lead Agency shall exercise its power of eminent domain, if necessary, to acquire
property needed for the Project.
g. Under no circumstances shall the contractor(s) or any other third party entity own or
imply ownership of products and services provided and paid for in part or in whole
with funds identified in this MOU.
h. The Lead Agency will be responsible for assuming all risks associated with the
Project except those that are assigned to another agency or jurisdiction that has
agreed to that assumption.
i. The Lead Agency shall require its contractors performing any portion of the Project
to name PAG as additional insured and additional indemnitee with respect to
insurance policies for general liability, automobile liability and defects in design in
all of the Lead Agency’s contracts for the Project. The Lead Agency shall also
require its contractors to name PAG, as well as any other funding agency involved
with the Project (RTA, ADOT, FHWA, etc.) as an additional beneficiary in any
performance and payment related assurances posted for the Project.
j. Monthly, the Lead Agency shall be responsible for preparing and submitting the
reimbursement requests (invoices) to PAG/ADOT or FHWA depending on the fund
source.
k. The Lead Agency shall be responsible for submitting a status report describing its
progress and adherence to the Project scope, schedule and budget to the TIP
Subcommittee upon request, and quarterly to PAG.
l. The Lead Agency shall indemnify, defend, and hold PAG and any other funding
providers harmless from any and all claims, demands, suits, actions, proceedings,
loss, cost, and damages of every kind and description, including any reasonable
attorneys’ fees and/or litigation expenses, which may be brought or made against
PAG and any other funding providers, and any of their officers, directors and
employees, or any person, regardless of who makes the claim, to the extent they
result from the negligent or wrongful acts of the Lead Agency or its contractors, or
any of their employees, agents, representatives, or sub-contractors, in connection with
or incidental to the performance of this MOU. The indemnity provided in this
section shall survive termination of this MOU.
m. The Lead Agency and its contractors shall clearly identify the funding source(s) for
the project, as well as any funding agency involved with the Project (PAG, RTA,
FTA, FHWA, etc.) in all documents and communications materials related to the
Project.Communications materials may include, but are not limited to, signs,
brochures, press releases, PowerPoint presentations, website information, reports,
agenda templates, DVD presentations, and any electronic documents.
5. Responsibilities of PAG.
a. PAG will annually publish a TIP document making regional projects eligible for state
and federal funding.
PAG MOU Form 02/02/15 5
b. PAG will aid the Lead Agency in preparation of any TIP amendments that may be
necessary for the completion of the project.
c. PAG will aggregate regional progress toward completion of the program and will
report to the region’s state and federal funding partners.
d. PAG will process drawdown requests associated with PAG HURF 12.6% funding.
6. Amendment.
a. This MOU may be modified, amended, altered or changed only by written agreement
signed by both parties.
b. An amendment to this MOU is required if the scope of work for the Project is
significantly altered, such as a change to the Project boundaries, a significant
alteration to the scope of services to be provided by the project, or addition or
elimination of significant Project features.
c. An amendment to this MOU is required if the total amount of regional funding
programmed on the Project changes are more than 10% of the total programmed
amount or $200,000, whichever is smaller. Funding changes less than this threshold
do not require an amendment to the MOU, as long as there are no significant changes
in scope.
6. Termination. Either party may terminate this MOU for material breach of the MOU by the
other party. Prior to any termination under this paragraph, the party allegedly in default shall be
given written notice by the other party of the nature of the alleged default. Upon termination,
programmed funds will no longer be available for use on said project. The party said to be in
default shall have forty-five days to cure the default. If the default is not cured within that time,
the other party may terminate this MOU. Any such termination shall not relieve either party from
liabilities or costs already incurred under this MOU.
7. Non-assignment. Neither party to this MOU shall assign its rights or obligations under this
MOU to any other party without written permission from the other party to this MOU.
8. Construction of MOU.
a. Entire agreement. This instrument constitutes the entire agreement between the
parties pertaining to the programming of the Project in the TIP. Any exhibits to this
MOU are incorporated herein by this reference.
b. Construction and interpretation. All provisions of this MOU shall be construed to be
consistent with the intention of the parties as expressed in the Recitals hereof.
c. Captions and headings. The headings used in this MOU are for convenience only and
are not intended to affect the meaning of any provision of this MOU.
d. Severability. In the event that any provision of this MOU or the application thereof is
declared invalid or void by statute or judicial decision, such action shall have no
PAG MOU Form 02/02/15 6
effect on other provisions and their application, which can be given effect without the
invalid or void provision or application, and to this extent the provisions of the MOU
are severable. In the event that any provision of this MOU is declared invalid or void,
the parties agree to meet promptly upon request of the other party in an attempt to
reach an agreement on a substitute provision.
f. This MOU is subject to the provisions of A.R.S. § 38-511.
9. Ownership of Improvements. If the Project involves construction, except as otherwise
provided for by law or under a contract with one or more other jurisdictions, ownership of and
title to all Project improvements shall automatically vest in Lead Agency upon completion of the
Project.
10. Legal Jurisdiction. Nothing in this MOU shall be construed as either limiting or extending
the legal jurisdiction of the Lead Agency or PAG.
11. No Joint Venture. It is not intended by this MOU to, and nothing contained in this MOU
shall be construed to, create any partnership, joint venture or employment relationship between
the parties or create any employer-employee relationship between the Lead Agency and any
PAG employees, or between PAG and any Lead Agency employees. Neither party shall be liable
for any debts, accounts, obligations or other liabilities whatsoever of the other, including
(without limitation) the other party's obligation to withhold Social Security and income taxes for
itself or any of its employees.
12. No Third Party Beneficiaries. Nothing in the provisions of this MOU is intended to create
duties or obligations to or rights in third parties not parties to this MOU or affect the legal
liability of either party to the MOU by imposing any standard of care different from the standard
of care imposed by law.
13. Compliance with Laws.The parties shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local
laws, rules, regulations, standards and executive orders, without limitation to those designated
within this MOU.
a. Anti-Discrimination. Neither party shall discriminate against any employee or client of
either party or any other individual in any way because of that person’s age, race, creed,
color, religion, sex, disability or national origin in the course of carrying out the duties
pursuant to this MOU. Both parties shall comply with applicable provisions of Executive
Order 75-5, as amended by Executive Order 2009-09 of the Governor of Arizona, which
are incorporated into this MOU by reference as if set forth in full herein, including the
provisions of A.R.S.'41-1463.
b. Americans with Disabilities Act. This MOU is subject to all applicable provisions of
the Americans with Disabilities Act (Public Law 101-336, 42 U.S.C. 12101-12213) and
all applicable federal regulations under the Act, including 28 CFR Parts 35 and 36.
14. Waiver. Waiver by either party of any breach of any term, covenant or condition herein
contained shall not be deemed a waiver of any other term, covenant or condition, or any
subsequent breach of the same or any other term, covenant, or condition herein contained.
PAG MOU Form 02/02/15 7
15. Force Majeure. A party shall not be in default under this MOU if it does not fulfill any of
its obligations under this MOU because it is prevented or delayed in doing so by reason of
uncontrollable forces. The term “uncontrollable forces” shall mean, for the purpose of this MOU,
any cause beyond the control of the party affected, including but not limited to failure of
facilities, breakage or accident to machinery or transmission facilities, weather conditions, flood,
earthquake, lightning, fire, epidemic, war, riot, civil disturbance, sabotage, strike, lockout, labor
dispute, boycott, material or energy shortage, casualty loss, acts of God, or action or non-action
by governmental bodies in approving or failing to act upon applications for approvals or permits
which are not due to the negligence or willful action of the parties, order of any government
officer or court (excluding orders promulgated by the parties themselves), and declared local,
state or national emergency, which, by exercise of due diligence and foresight, such party could
not reasonably have been expected to avoid. Either party rendered unable to fulfill any
obligations by reason of uncontrollable forces shall exercise due diligence to remove such
inability with all reasonable dispatch.
16. Notification. All notices or demands upon any party to this MOU shall be in writing, unless
other forms are designated elsewhere, and shall be delivered in person or sent by mail addressed
as follows:
Pima Association of Governments:
_______________________
_______________________
_______________________
Town of Oro Valley:
_______________________
_______________________
_______________________
17. Remedies. Either party may pursue any remedies provided by law for the breach of this
MOU. No right or remedy is intended to be exclusive of any other right or remedy and each shall
be cumulative and in addition to any other right or remedy existing at law or in equity or by
virtue of this MOU.
18. Counterparts. This MOU may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which
shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same
instrument. The signature pages from one or more counterpart may be removed from such
counterpart and attached to a single instrument.
In Witness Whereof, the Town of Oro Valley has caused this MOU to be executed by
the ___________________, upon resolution of the ______________ attested to by the
_____________, and PAG has caused this MOU to be executed by its Chair of the Regional
Council.
PIMA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
__________________________________ ________________
Duane Blumberg, Regional Council Chair Date
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
__________________________________ _________________
Dr. Satish I. Hiremath, Mayor Date
PAG MOU Form 02/02/15 8
ATTEST:
__________________________________ _________________
Julie Bower, Town Clerk Date
The foregoing MOU between the Town of Oro Valley and PAG has been approved as to content
and is hereby recommended by the undersigned.
___________________________________________________________
Mr. Farhad Moghimi, Executive Director Town of Oro Valley
PAG MOU Form 02/02/15 9
PAG TIP Memorandum of Understanding: Exhibit A
Base Information
Project Name La Cañada Drive / Moore Road Intersection Safety Study
TIP ID
Project Location La Cañada Drive / Moore Road Intersection
Project
Description
La Cañada Drive and Moore Rood intersection is 4-way stop controlled and
has a high rate of non-compliance. Since January 2010 to current there have
been 14 non-injury collisions and 2 injury collisions. Five of the non-injury
collisions have been in 2015. Several accidents have resulted in severe
property damage, but no severe injuries. The intersection has no dedicated
roadway lighting.
This study will evaluate the existing conditions at the proposed intersection
and identify problems and present solutions respectively. The study will
take into account the high growth rate at the vicinity of the intersection and
present options for future traffic control improvements.
Lanes Before 4 Lanes After 4
Project Contact Jose N. Rodriguez
Project Contact (520) 229-4872 jrodriguez@orovalleyaz.gov
Estimated Project Schedule
Phase Estimated
Start Date
Estimated
End Date
Study August
2016
February
2017
Estimated Project Budget
Phase Regional
Funding
Source
Year Amount
Study HURF PDAF 2016 $50,000
Please list any agreements related to the project:
None
Phase Other
Funding
Source
Year Amount
PAG MOU Form 02/02/15 10
For Infrastructure Projects: mark all that apply
ADA Enhancements Landscaping Signals X
Art Medians Signalized Ped Crossing
Bike Racks Multiuse Paths Signing X
Bridge New Bike Lanes Sound Walls
Bus Pullouts New Sidewalks Street Lighting
Culverts Overpass Striping
Curbs Pavement Preservation Turn Lanes
Detection Cameras X Pedestrian Lighting Underpass
Drainage Structures Rubberized Asphalt Utility Relocation
Guardrails Right of Way Purchase Wildlife Crossing
Additional Project Features
This project may lead to a signalized intersection.
For non-infrastructure projects: describe the outcomes and deliverables with project costs
associated with each
N/A
Describe how the region as a whole will benefit from this project, including any jurisdictions that
will be affected or receive benefits from the project.
La Cañada Dr. is a north-south arterial roadway that connects northern Oro Valley to the City of
Tucson and is primarily 4 lane divided. Moore Rd. is a collector roadway that connects from
Rancho Vistoso Blvd. to Dove Mtn. (Town of Marana and Pima County) and is primarily 4 lane
divided east of La Cañada Dr.
Town Council Regular Session Item # C.
Meeting Date:03/02/2016
Submitted By:Robert Kirschmann
Development Infrastructure Services
Department:Development Infrastructure Services
Information
SUBJECT:
Request for approval of an amended Final Plat for the Innovation Corporate Center,
located on the northeast corner of Innovation Park Drive and Vistoso Park Road
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The purpose of this request is to consider an amended Final Plat for the Innovation
Corporate Center, located on the northeast corner of Innovation Park Drive and Vistoso
Park Road. (Attachment 1). The proposed Final Plat (Attachment 2) proposes to divide
the property into two (2) separate lots.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
The amended Final Plat requires Town Council approval prior to being officially recorded
by Pima County.
The amended Final Plat does not affect the existing site conditions (i.e. sidewalks and
driveways) or design components approved as part of the existing Development Plan.
The sole purpose of the amended Final Plat is to divide the 2.48 acre parcel into two lots
consisting of 1.32 acres and 1.16 acres. A pre-application meeting was held on January
15, 2016, for an orthopedic facility to be developed on the proposed 1.32 acre lot.
Proposed Improvements
2.48 acres subdivided into 2 lots
Lot 2A: 1.32 acres
Lot 2B: 1.16 acres
Previous Approvals
February 2014: Final Plat approved for Innovation Corporate Center
August 2007: Final Plat approved for Blocks 1-8, Innovation Corporate Center
December 2006: Development Plan approved for Innovation Corporate Center
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to APPROVE the amended Final Plat for the Innovation Corporate Center,
finding that it meets Town requirements.
OR
I MOVE to DENY the amended Final Plat for the Innovation Corporate Center, finding
that ___________________.
Attachments
Location Map
Amended Final Plat
LOCATION MAP
INNOVATION CORPORATE CENTER (OV1501793)
Attachment 1
Tangerine Road
Or
a
c
l
e
R
o
a
d
Vistoso Park Rd
Oro Valley
Hospital
Oro Valley
Marketplace
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
#
2
APPROVALS I • CLERK OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS APPROVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ON THE DAY OF , 20,_~ CLERK, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY DATE PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPT. DATE TOWN ENGINEER DATE PLANNING & ZONING ADMINISTRATOR DATE
F
I
N
A
L
P
L
A
T
I
N
N
O
V
A
T
I
O
N
C
O
R
P
O
R
A
T
E
C
E
N
T
E
R
B
L
O
C
K
2
-
L
O
T
S
2
A
&
2
B
O
V
1
5
0
1
7
9
3
-
F
N
D
A
C
P
R
L
S
1
2
2
1
4
C
O
R
O
N
A
D
O
,
N
A
T
I
O
N
A
L
,
F
O
R
E
S
T
WATER UTI LITY or RECTOR DATE
O
R
O
Y
A
L
L
E
Y
H
O
S
P
I
T
A
L
D
K
T
.
1
2
9
1
2
,
P
G
.
3
6
0
9
L
=
6
8
.
5
7
'
R
=
4
D
.
O
O
l
l
o
=
9
8
1
2
'
4
7
"
I
N
N
O
Y
A
T
I
O
N
C
O
R
P
O
R
A
T
E
C
E
N
T
E
R
R
E
S
U
B
D
I
Y
I
S
I
O
N
O
F
B
L
O
C
K
1
B
K
.
6
3
,
M
t
f
t
:
P
,
P
G
.
1
6
v
rATER ADEQUACY THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY HAS BEEN DESIGNATED BY THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT WATER RES
O
U
R
C
E
S
AS HAVING AN ASSURED WATER SUPPLY, PURSUANT TO ARS§ 45-576 AND HERBY CERTIFIES
I
N
WRITING TO SUPPLY WATER TO THIS SUBDIVISION. BY: ""'W-"'A-=T=ER::--:"UC=T=CI L:-::I-=T'"'"Y -::D'""I-=-R=-E C=-=T=-=O-=R---RECORDING DATA STATE OF ARIZONA) )SS COUNTY OF PIMA) DATE: NO: ____ _ FEE~: ____ _ THIS INSTRUMENT WAS FILED FOR RECORD AT THE REQUEST OF THE WLB GROUP, INC., ON THIS DAY OF ______ --==-____ -' 20 , AT M. IN SEQ. NO. ____ ~, THEREOF. F. ANN RODRIGUEZ, PIMA COUNTY RECORDER BY: _______________ _ DEPUTY FOR PIMA COUNTY RECORDER DEDICATION WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, HEREBY WARRANT THAT WE ARE ALL AND THE ONLY PARTIES HAVING ANY RECORD TITLE INTEREST IN THE LAND SHOWN ON THIS PLAT AND WE CONSENT TO THE SUBDIVISION OF SAID LAND IN THE MANNER SHOWN HEREON. WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, OUR SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, DO HEREBY SAVE THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, THEIR EMPLOYEES, OFFICERS AND AGENTS HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES RELATED TO THE USE OF SAID LANDS, NOW AND IN THE FUTURE, BY REASO
N
OF FLOODING, FLOWAGE, EROSION OR DAMAGE CAUSED BY WATER, WHETHER SURFACE, FLOOD, OR RAINFALL. IT IS FURTHER UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED THAT NATURAL DRAINAGE SHALL NOT BE ALTERED, DISTURBED OR OBSTRUCTED WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL. VWI/VISTOSO DEVELOPMENT INC., AN ARIZONA CORPORATION BY: ______________________________ ___ NOTABY STATE OF ARIZONA) )SS COUNTY OF PIMA ) ON THIS THE DAY OF . 2016, BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED OFFICER, PERSONALLY APPEARED , WHO ACKNOWLEDGED HIMSELF (HERSELF) TO BE THE OF VWI/VISTOSO DEVELOPMENT INC., AN ARIZONA CORPORATION BEING AUTHORIZED SO TO DO, EXECUTED THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT FOR THE PURPOSE THEREIN CONTAINED, BY SIGNING AS ________ _ NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: ASSUJW{C8S ASSURANCES IN THE FORM OF ____ FROM _____ _ AS RECORDED IN SEQ NO. ____ , HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO GUARANTEE DRAINAGE AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS (INCLUDING MONUMENTS) AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS (ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, GAS, SEWER, WATER) IN THIS SUBDIVISION. BY: ""7M"7CA:7YC=O-=R---:T:::O:-"CWN:::-:--::O-=-F--:O:C:R:-:O:-:-:V"""AL'"'"L-=E::"7y DATE: ASSURANCES IN THE FORM OF , FROM IN THE AMOUNT OF $ HAVE BEEN PROVIDED TO GUARANTEE THE RESEEDING OF THIS SUBDIVISION IN THE EVENT THE PROJECT IS ABANDONED. The WLB Group Engineering. Planning • Surveying Landscape Architecture. Urban Design Offices located in Tucson, Phoenix. Flagstaff, AZ. and Las Vegas, NV. 4444 East Broad~ay Tucson, Arizona (520) 881-7480
I
N
N
O
V
A
T
I
O
N
C
O
R
P
O
R
A
T
E
C
E
N
T
E
R
B
L
O
C
K
2
-
L
O
T
f
S
e
q
.
2
0
f
4
f
3
4
0
0
3
0
I
N
N
O
Y
A
T
I
O
N
C
O
R
P
O
R
A
T
E
C
E
N
T
E
R
/
-
-
-
-
-
f
R
E
S
U
B
D
I
Y
I
S
I
O
N
O
F
B
L
O
C
K
1
B
K
.
6
3
,
M
t
f
t
:
P
,
P
G
.
1
6
O
r
N
E
R
/
D
E
Y
E
L
O
P
E
R
V
W
I
/
V
I
S
T
O
S
O
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
I
N
C
.
6
0
0
7
E
.
G
R
A
N
T
R
D
.
T
U
C
S
O
N
,
A
Z
8
5
7
1
2
(
5
2
0
)
7
2
2
-
9
2
9
2
A
T
T
N
:
N
I
E
L
S
I
M
O
N
N
S
I
M
O
N
O
V
E
N
T
U
R
E
W
E
S
T
A
Z
.
C
O
M
I
N
N
O
Y
A
T
I
O
N
C
O
R
P
O
R
A
T
E
C
E
N
T
E
R
B
L
O
C
K
4
-
L
O
T
1
L
=
1
1
4
.
0
1
'
R
=
1
6
7
5
.
0
0
l
l
o
=
Y
5
4
'
O
O
·
O
R
O
Y
A
L
L
E
Y
H
O
S
P
I
T
A
L
D
K
T
.
1
2
9
1
2
,
P
G
.
3
6
0
9
L
O
T
2
A
.
L
O
T
2
B
4
0
2
.
1
7
'
R
=
4
0
.
0
0
V
I
S
T
O
S
O
~
.
.
.
w
•
'
"
S
e
q
.
2
0
1
3
1
3
0
0
0
5
3
L
=
6
0
.
9
7
'
_
_
N
:
8
:
4
i
i
4
~
'
~
4
6
~
"
E
~
~
.
!
~
1
A
l
B
~
~
R
~
0
f
.
D
-
;
:
~
T
-
-
-
8
=
8
7
i
9
'
3
5
"
,
-
I
;
"
i
~
F
"
'
I
N
N
O
Y
A
T
I
O
N
C
O
R
P
O
R
A
T
E
C
E
N
T
E
R
I
N
N
O
Y
A
T
I
O
N
C
O
R
P
O
R
A
T
E
C
E
N
T
E
R
B
L
O
C
K
5
B
K
.
6
3
,
M
t
f
t
:
P
,
P
G
,
1
7
E
t
J
P
R
O
J
~
~
:
,
~
A
Y
O
U
T
G
E
N
E
R
A
L
N
O
T
E
S
1
.
G
R
O
S
S
A
R
E
A
O
F
S
U
B
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
I
S
1
0
8
,
0
2
0
S
.
F
(
2
.
4
8
A
C
R
E
S
)
2
.
T
O
T
A
L
N
U
M
B
E
R
O
F
L
O
T
S
I
S
2
.
3
.
T
O
T
A
L
M
I
L
E
S
O
F
N
E
W
P
U
B
L
I
C
S
T
R
E
E
T
I
S
0
.
0
M
I
L
E
S
.
.
.
.
:
'
"
I
~
~
I
~
~
~
~
I
8
~
/
'
"
~
I
~
I
Z
1
I
\
'
"
,
.
.
.
I
\
.
.
.
.
1
"
'
-
~
g
3
1
~
B
L
O
C
K
6
g
B
K
.
6
3
,
M
t
f
t
:
P
,
P
G
.
1
7
V
l
3
2
0
.
~
T
l
l
S
l
/
~
T
'
;
"
:
;
1
2
S
~
-
6
-
D
5
-
-
-
F
N
D
A
C
P
A
L
S
O
F
N
D
A
C
P
L
S
3
5
9
8
0
2
.
0
7
'
N
,
O
.
2
3
'
W
4
.
T
H
E
M
A
X
I
M
U
M
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
H
E
I
G
H
T
I
S
T
H
R
E
E
(
3
)
S
T
O
R
I
E
S
O
R
T
H
I
R
T
Y
F
O
U
R
(
3
4
)
F
E
E
T
.
5
.
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
S
A
R
E
T
W
E
N
T
Y
(
2
0
)
F
E
E
T
F
R
O
N
T
,
T
W
E
N
T
Y
F
I
V
E
(
2
5
)
F
E
E
T
R
E
A
R
.
6
.
Z
O
N
I
N
G
I
S
R
A
N
C
H
O
V
I
S
T
O
S
O
P
.
A
.
D
.
(
C
-
1
;
C
O
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
C
O
M
M
E
R
C
I
A
L
)
7
.
N
O
F
U
R
T
H
E
R
S
U
B
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
O
F
A
N
Y
L
O
T
O
R
P
A
R
C
E
L
S
H
O
W
N
W
I
L
L
B
E
D
O
N
E
W
I
T
H
O
U
T
T
H
E
W
R
l
m
N
A
P
P
R
O
V
A
L
O
F
T
H
E
O
R
O
V
A
L
L
E
Y
T
O
W
N
C
O
U
N
C
I
L
.
8
.
T
H
E
B
A
S
I
S
O
F
B
E
A
R
I
N
G
F
O
R
T
H
I
S
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
I
S
T
H
E
E
A
S
T
L
I
N
E
O
F
T
H
E
S
O
U
T
H
E
A
S
T
Q
U
A
R
T
E
R
O
F
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
3
1
,
T
O
W
N
S
H
I
P
1
1
S
O
U
T
H
,
R
A
N
G
E
1
4
E
A
S
T
,
G
I
L
A
A
N
D
S
A
L
T
R
I
V
E
R
B
A
S
E
&
M
E
R
I
D
I
A
N
A
S
S
H
O
W
N
O
N
T
H
E
F
I
N
A
L
P
L
A
T
O
F
R
A
N
C
H
O
V
I
S
T
O
S
O
N
E
I
G
H
B
O
R
H
O
O
D
3
I
N
N
O
V
A
T
I
O
N
C
O
R
P
O
R
A
T
E
C
E
N
T
E
R
B
L
O
C
K
2
,
A
S
R
E
C
O
R
D
E
D
I
N
S
E
Q
,
2
0
1
4
1
3
4
0
0
3
0
,
T
O
W
N
O
F
O
R
O
V
A
L
L
E
Y
,
P
I
M
A
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
A
R
I
Z
O
N
A
.
S
A
I
D
B
E
A
R
I
N
G
B
E
I
N
G
S
O
O
·
O
O
'
2
9
"
E
.
9
.
T
H
E
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
O
W
N
E
R
,
H
I
S
S
U
C
C
E
S
S
O
R
S
,
A
S
S
I
G
N
S
O
R
A
D
E
S
I
G
N
A
T
E
D
H
O
M
E
O
W
N
E
R
S
A
S
S
O
C
I
A
T
I
O
N
A
G
R
E
E
S
T
O
1
)
K
E
E
P
A
L
L
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
D
L
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
D
A
R
E
A
S
M
A
I
N
T
A
I
N
E
D
I
N
A
W
E
E
D
F
R
E
E
,
T
R
A
S
H
F
R
E
E
C
O
N
D
I
T
I
O
N
,
2
)
R
E
P
L
A
C
E
A
N
Y
D
E
A
D
P
L
A
N
T
M
A
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
W
I
T
H
I
N
9
0
D
A
Y
S
A
N
D
3
)
M
A
I
N
T
A
I
N
T
H
E
I
R
R
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
S
Y
S
T
E
M
I
N
P
R
O
P
E
R
W
O
R
K
I
N
G
O
R
D
E
R
.
1
0
.
T
H
E
R
E
S
H
A
L
L
B
E
A
M
I
N
I
M
U
M
O
F
1
0
P
E
R
C
E
N
T
O
F
T
H
E
T
O
T
A
L
A
R
E
A
R
E
T
A
I
N
E
D
A
S
O
P
E
N
S
P
A
C
E
.
1
1
.
A
M
I
N
I
M
U
M
O
F
1
0
'
I
S
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
D
B
E
T
W
E
E
N
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
S
.
1
2
.
O
R
O
V
A
L
L
E
Y
W
A
T
E
R
W
I
L
L
B
E
T
H
E
W
A
T
E
R
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
P
R
O
V
I
D
E
R
.
1
3
.
T
H
E
I
N
G
R
E
S
S
-
E
G
R
E
S
S
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
S
H
O
W
N
O
N
T
H
I
S
P
L
A
T
I
S
D
E
D
I
C
A
T
E
D
F
O
R
P
R
I
V
A
T
E
A
N
D
P
U
B
L
I
C
U
S
E
T
O
P
R
O
V
I
D
E
S
H
A
R
E
D
A
C
C
E
S
S
T
O
L
O
T
S
2
A
A
N
D
2
B
O
N
L
Y
.
T
H
E
L
O
T
O
W
N
E
R
S
O
R
T
H
E
I
R
H
E
I
R
S
O
R
A
S
S
I
G
N
S
S
H
A
L
L
A
C
C
E
P
T
A
L
L
R
E
S
P
O
N
S
I
B
I
L
I
T
Y
F
O
R
T
H
E
C
O
N
T
R
O
L
,
M
A
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
,
S
A
F
E
T
Y
A
N
D
L
I
A
B
I
L
I
T
Y
O
F
T
H
E
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
A
N
D
A
N
Y
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
W
I
T
H
I
N
S
A
I
D
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
.
L
F
c
E
N
D
D
F
O
U
N
D
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
C
O
R
N
E
R
A
S
N
O
T
E
D
-
-
C
E
N
T
E
R
L
I
N
E
•
F
O
U
N
D
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
C
O
R
N
E
R
A
S
N
O
T
E
D
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
o
S
E
T
1
/
2
"
I
R
O
N
P
I
N
T
A
G
G
E
D
L
S
4
4
1
2
1
-
-
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
L
I
N
E
W
C
A
T
I
O
N
M
A
P
A
P
O
R
T
!
O
N
O
F
S
E
C
T
!
O
N
3
1
3
"
=
1
M
I
L
E
T
O
W
N
S
H
I
P
1
1
S
O
U
T
H
,
R
A
N
G
E
1
4
E
A
S
T
,
G
.
&
S
.
R
.
M
.
,
T
O
W
N
O
F
O
R
O
V
A
L
L
E
Y
,
P
I
M
A
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
A
R
I
Z
O
N
A
C
E
R
T
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
I
J
I
T
l
l
D
S
T
'
O
S
P
I
T
A
L
N
O
R
T
l
l
D
S
T
H
O
S
P
I
T
A
L
'
"
=
5
0
0
'
C
-
f
I
N
C
B
Z
O
N
I
N
G
M
A
P
O
R
O
V
A
L
L
E
Y
P
.
A
.
D
.
I
H
E
R
E
B
Y
C
E
R
T
I
F
Y
T
H
A
T
T
H
E
B
O
U
N
D
A
R
Y
S
U
R
V
E
Y
S
H
O
W
N
O
N
T
H
I
S
P
L
A
T
W
A
S
P
E
R
F
O
R
M
E
D
U
N
D
E
R
M
Y
D
I
R
E
C
T
I
O
N
A
N
D
T
H
A
T
A
L
L
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
A
N
D
/
O
R
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
S
U
R
V
E
Y
M
O
N
U
M
E
N
T
S
A
N
D
M
A
R
K
E
R
S
S
H
O
W
N
A
R
E
C
O
R
R
E
C
T
L
Y
D
E
S
C
R
I
B
E
D
.
I
F
U
R
T
H
E
R
C
E
R
T
I
F
Y
T
H
A
T
T
H
I
S
P
L
A
T
W
A
S
P
R
E
P
A
R
E
D
U
N
D
E
R
M
Y
D
I
R
E
C
T
I
O
N
.
f
J
t
\
P
E
T
E
R
D
.
C
O
T
E
,
R
.
L
.
S
.
N
O
.
4
4
1
2
1
O
V
1
5
0
1
7
9
3
F
I
N
A
L
P
L
A
T
I
N
N
O
V
A
T
I
O
N
C
O
R
P
O
R
A
T
E
C
E
N
T
E
R
B
L
O
C
K
2
-
L
O
T
S
2
A
&
;
0
2
B
A
R
E
S
U
B
D
I
V
l
S
I
O
N
O
F
R
A
N
C
H
O
V
l
S
T
O
S
O
N
E
I
G
H
B
O
R
H
O
O
D
3
I
N
N
O
V
A
T
I
O
N
C
O
R
P
O
R
A
l
E
C
E
N
l
E
R
B
l
O
C
K
2
-
L
O
T
2
R
E
C
O
R
D
E
D
I
N
S
E
Q
.
N
O
.
2
0
1
4
1
3
4
0
0
3
0
A
F
O
U
N
D
B
R
A
S
S
C
A
P
S
U
R
V
E
Y
M
O
N
U
M
E
N
T
S
T
A
M
P
E
D
"
R
L
S
1
2
2
1
4
"
B
O
U
N
D
A
R
Y
L
I
N
E
O
R
L
O
T
L
I
N
E
0
V
1
1
2
-
0
2
5
0
V
1
2
-
0
6
-
1
4
B
0
V
0
9
-
0
7
-
0
7
0
V
1
2
1
3
-
2
9
B
E
I
N
G
A
P
<
J
m
(
)
l
o
r
S
E
C
T
I
(
)
I
3
1
m
Y
t
N
S
H
I
P
1
1
S
C
l
I
l
H
,
R
A
N
G
E
1
4
E
A
S
T
,
G
I
e
S
,
R
.
.
.
.
~
O
F
(
R
)
V
A
I
.
l
£
Y
,
P
I
M
A
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
A
R
I
Z
O
N
A
S
H
E
E
T
1
O
F
2
S
E
Q
.
#
:
•
•
•
a
U
J
V
l
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
#
2
The WLB Group \ \ \ \ I \ \ 75.00' ~-~ \ I \ \ " \ \ ~ \ \ I \ \ \ \ \ I I \ \ " \ \ ~ \ \ \ \ " \ \ ~ \ \ I \ I \ \ " \ \ ~ \ \ " \ \ I \ I \\ \ \ " \ \ " \ \ " \ "\ \ ......... -"\ \ I I \ I I I " \ j,..--\ " \ I \ " \ \ " \ \ .) I \ \ I "\ \ ....... \ \--'1" " I \ " \ \ I I " \ \ \ " I I " \ \ " \ \ I I I " \ I " \ I ~ \ I " I I " I I \ I"I"';I-_FND ~" REBA
R
\ r:-I I \RLS 26923 I ~ I I I ~ I I I . .\>' II I <1'. II I I \ I I I I I -;Xl \1 II \ I ... \ \ l' NO A
C
C
E
S
S
E
S
M
T
BK. 63,
M
&
P
,
P
G
.
1
7
I ~ \ I 1",,\\ \ I 0 I \ 10'
E
L
E
C
T
E
S
M
T
o \ 1\ \ I DKT.
1
3
2
8
3
,
P
G
.
6
8
~....:.--., \ 10'
W
A
T
E
R
E
S
M
T
75.00' \ \ '.-----i\ \ DKT.
1
3
2
2
5
,
P
G
.
5
0
6
\~-"\\ \ ~ \ \
2
5
'
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
\ c5. \ I \
B
K
.
6
3
,
M
&
P
,
P
G
.
1
7
\ ~ I I • I \
2
0
'
W
A
T
E
R
E
S
M
T
\ Ii'" -
D
K
T
.
8
0
6
5
,
P
G
.
9
9
3
-I I I \
R
A
N
C
H
O
V
I
S
T
O
S
O
N
E
I
C
H
B
O
R
H
O
O
D
8
I
N
N
O
V
A
T
I
O
N
C
O
R
P
O
R
A
T
E
C
E
N
T
E
R
B
L
O
C
K
2
-
L
O
T
f
S
e
q
.
2
0
f
4
f
8
4
0
0
8
0
R
A
N
C
H
O
V
I
S
T
O
S
O
P
.
A
.
D
.
L
O
T
2
A
5
7
,
4
9
8
S
O
.
F
T
.
1
.
3
2
0
0
A
C
R
E
S
R
A
N
C
H
O
V
I
S
T
O
S
O
P
.
A
.
D
.
C
-
l
C
P
I
L
O
T
2
B
5
0
,
5
2
0
S
O
.
F
T
.
1
.
1
5
9
8
A
C
R
E
S
R
A
N
C
H
O
V
I
S
T
O
S
O
P
.
A
.
D
.
S
8
4
'
1
4
'
4
?
"
W
_
-
/
4
4
.
0
0
I
I
~
I
~
\
5
-
C
-
l
I
N
G
R
E
S
S
/
E
G
R
E
S
S
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
P
E
R
T
H
I
S
P
L
A
T
\ \ \ 11,
+
,
I \ \ \
"
'
I
'
"
r
-
-
D
R
A
I
N
A
G
E
E
S
M
T
1
"
'
"
a
I
'
"
i
"
,
~\ !-1' r e 1 II . '" lJ1 lJ1 :::0 ~ II • ~ C>~ __ g o o \ Engineering. Planning • Sut"veying Landscape Architecture. Urban Design Offices located in Tucson. Phoenix, Flagstaff, AZ. and Las Vegas, NV. 4444 East Broad~ay Tucson. Arizona (520) 881-7480 I I I
\
\ II--
~
I I I £"<6 I \4:.8/.
0
0
I I "
1
9
'
>
I I
~
.
I I I I \ , I I I I I I I , I I ---1-I I I I I I I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1
B
K
.
6
3
,
M
&
P
,
P
G
.
1
7
F
N
D
2
"
R
E
B
A
R
R
L
S
1
2
2
1
4
2
1
6
.
4
9
'
N
8
4
'
1
4
'
4
6
"
(
4
0
.
0
0
'
4
0
.
0
0
'
1
!
1
g
.
l
1
1
0
.
0
0
'
(
E
S
M
T
T
I
E
)
I
N
N
O
V
A
T
I
O
N
C
O
R
P
O
R
A
T
E
C
E
N
T
E
R
B
L
O
C
K
5
B
K
.
6
8
,
M
&
:
P
,
P
C
.
1
7
R
A
N
C
H
O
V
I
S
T
O
S
O
P
.
A
.
D
.
C
-
l
1
:
1
"
I
g
.
i
4
0
2
.
1
7
'
S
E
W
E
R
E
S
M
T
1
8
5
.
6
8
'
D
K
T
.
1
3
0
4
7
,
P
G
.
1
6
8
3
2
5
'
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
•
o
n
-
0
"
<
1
-
c
c
-
n
o
o
>
"
"
"
:
0
,
.
.
C
X
l
C
X
l
L
O
I
I
I
I
I
l
-
I
I
I
:
:
<
:
l
t
n
o
~
.
~
•
f
T
I
F
N
D
r
R
E
B
A
R
R
L
S
2
6
9
2
3
F
N
D
r
R
E
B
A
R
R
L
S
1
2
2
1
4
I
N
N
O
V
A
T
I
O
N
C
O
R
P
O
R
A
T
E
C
E
N
T
E
R
C
O
M
M
O
N
A
R
E
A
"
A
"
B
K
.
6
8
,
M
&
:
P
,
P
C
.
1
7
R
A
N
C
H
O
V
I
S
T
O
S
O
P
.
A
.
D
.
L
I
N
E
A
R
P
A
R
K
o
·
3
0
·
6
0
·
9
0
·
B
K
.
6
3
,
M
&
P
,
P
G
.
1
7
-
F
N
D
r
R
E
B
A
R
R
L
S
1
2
2
1
4
I
N
N
O
V
A
T
I
O
N
C
O
R
P
O
R
A
T
E
C
E
N
T
E
R
C
O
M
M
O
N
A
R
E
A
"
A
"
B
K
.
6
8
,
M
&
:
P
,
P
C
.
1
7
R
A
N
C
H
O
V
I
S
T
O
S
O
P
.
A
.
D
.
0
V
1
1
2
-
0
2
5
0
V
1
2
-
0
6
-
1
4
8
0
'
1
/
0
9
-
0
7
-
0
7
R
E
F
:
0
V
1
2
1
3
-
2
9
L
I
N
E
A
R
P
A
R
K
O
V
1
5
0
1
7
9
3
F
I
N
A
L
P
L
A
T
I
N
N
O
V
A
T
I
O
N
C
O
R
P
O
R
A
T
E
C
E
N
T
E
R
B
L
O
C
K
2
-
L
O
T
S
2
A
t
k
2
B
A
R
E
S
U
B
O
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
o
r
R
A
N
Q
l
O
V
I
S
l
U
S
O
N
E
l
G
H
B
C
H
l
O
O
O
3
I
N
N
O
V
A
T
I
O
N
C
O
R
P
m
A
l
E
C
E
N
l
E
R
B
L
O
C
K
2
-
L
O
T
2
R
E
C
O
R
D
E
D
I
N
S
E
Q
.
N
O
.
2
0
1
4
1
3
4
0
0
3
0
B
E
I
N
G
A
F
'
a
m
O
N
o
r
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
3
1
1
t
W
I
6
l
l
P
1
1
S
O
O
l
H
,
R
A
N
G
E
1
4
E
A
S
T
,
G
a
c
s
'
R
.
Y
.
l
t
M
I
I
I
F
m
o
V
A
L
L
E
Y
,
P
I
M
A
<
X
l
M
Y
,
A
R
I
Z
O
N
A
S
H
E
E
T
2
O
F
2
S
E
Q
.
#
:
•
•
•
o
L
L
J
V
l
Town Council Regular Session Item # D.
Meeting Date:03/02/2016
Requested by: Mayor Hiremath & Councilmember Hornat
Submitted By:Julie Bower, Town Clerk's Office
Department:Town Clerk's Office
Information
SUBJECT:
*Cancellation of the March 16, 2016 regular Town Council meeting
RECOMMENDATION:
N/A
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
At its regular meeting on December 2, 2015, the Council approved the 2016 regular
Town Council meeting schedule which included a regular meeting scheduled for March
16, 2016. Currently, there is no business scheduled for the March 16th regular Town
Council meeting. In the event that the Town Council would like to cancel the March 16th
regular Town Council meeting, the Mayor and Council must take formal action.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to cancel the March 16th regular Town Council meeting.
Attachments
No file(s) attached.
Town Council Regular Session Item # 1.
Meeting Date:03/02/2016
Requested by: Julie Bower Submitted By:Mike Standish, Town
Clerk's Office
Department:Town Clerk's Office
Information
SUBJECT:
PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING AN
APPLICATION FOR A SERIES 12 (RESTAURANT) LIQUOR LICENSE FOR
SMASHBURGER #4, LOCATED AT 7625 N. ORACLE RD. #145
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of this liquor license to the Arizona Department of Liquor
Licenses and Control for the following reasons:
1. No protests to this license have been received.
2. The necessary background investigation was conducted by the Police Department.
3. The Police Department has no objection to the approval of the Series 12 Liquor
License.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application for a new Series 12 (Restaurant) Liquor License has been submitted
by Owner Eric Wolf for Smashburger #4 located at 7625 N. Oracle Rd. #145.
Mr. Wolf has submitted all necessary paperwork to the Town of Oro Valley and the
Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and has paid all related fees
associated with applying for the liquor license ($500 Application Processing Fee).
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
This non-transferable, on-sale retail privileges liquor license allows the holder of a
restaurant license to sell and serve spirituous liquor solely for consumption on the
premises of an establishment, which derives at least 40% of its gross revenue from the
sale of food. Failure to meet the 40% food requirement shall result in revocation of the
license.
In accordance with Section 4-201 of the Arizona Revised Statutes, the application was
In accordance with Section 4-201 of the Arizona Revised Statutes, the application was
posted for 20 days on the premises of the applicant's property, ending February 17,
2016. No protests were received during this time period.
Police Chief Daniel Sharp completed a standard background check on Smashburger
#4 and Owner Eric Wolf. Chief Sharp has no objection to the approval of the Series 12
(Restaurant) License.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Per Ordinance No. (O)11-16, the Town of Oro Valley charges a $500 liquor license
application processing fee to cover the costs incurred by the Town to process the
application.
Per Section 8-2-6 Schedule of the Oro Valley Town Code, persons licensed by the State
of Arizona to deal in spirituous liquor within the Town shall pay an annual license fee of
$80.00 to the Town.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to (recommend or deny) approval of the issuance of a Series 12 Liquor License
to the Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control for Eric Wolf for Smashburger
#4, located at 7625 N. Oracle Rd. #145.
Attachments
Smashburger #4 Liquor License
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Mike Standi s h
DANI EL G. SHARP
C HI EF OF PO LI CE
Daniel Q. Sharp ,
1)/(. ~ ~r c\..<,~+-5k.rj'
11 February 2016
Application for Liquor License
Smash Burger Restaurant and Owner Eric Wolf
On February 11,2016, the Oro Valley Police Department comp leted
the s tandard background investigation on Eric Wolf and Smas h Burger
Restaurant located at 7625 N Oracle Rd #145.
The Oro Valley Police Department has no objection for the issuance
of a liquor license to Eric Wolf and Smash Burger Restaurant located at
7625 N Oracle Rd #145.
11000 N. La Caftada Drive • Oro Va ll ey, AZ 85737
Phon e 520-229-4900 • Fax 520-229-4979 • www.ovpd.org
1"1' ·if'1'n •. c"o.·· rot) 1.:1,1 ... ) _." ... -uJ
Arizona Department otliquor licenses and Control
BOO W Washington 5th Floor
Phoenix, AZ 85007
www.azliquor.gov
(602) 542·5141
Application for liquor lic e nse
Type or Print with Black Ink
SECTION 1 Th is application is for a:
Dlnterim Permit (Complete Section 5)
IKlNew License (Complete Sections 2. 3. 4, 13. 14. 15. 16)
D Person Transfer (Complete Section 2. 3. 4. 12, 13. 14,16)
Dlocation Transfer (Bars and Liq uor Stores Only)
(Comple t eSedion2,3,4, 11, 13, 14.16)
DProbate! Will Assignment! Divorce Decree
(Complete Sections 2. 3. 4, 9, 13, 14. 16)
(Fee not req ui red)
DGovernment (Complete Sections 2. 3, 4.10. 13, 16) o Seasonal
SECTION 2 Type of Ownership:
DJ.T.W.R.O.S .(Complete Sedion 6)
Dlndividual(Complete Sedion 6)
DPartnership (Complete Section 6)
DCorporation (Complete Section 7)
IKlLimited Liability Co (C omplete Sec tion 7)
OClub (Comple te Sedion 8)
OGovernment (Complete Section 10)
Drrust (Complete Sedion 6)
Drnbe (Complete Section 6)
Dother (Explain)
L--,::/
"' '<.' ~.
SECTION 3 Type of license LICENSE #------'-'\ Q.\~bL\l\--'-..l..J\w.4-__ -,--__ _
I. Type of Li cense : _----'S::E::R.::IE=S::..:II::..:I:::2 ____________________________ _
APPLICATION FEE AND INTERIM PERMIT FEES (IF APPLICABLE) ARE NOT REFUNDABLE
A serv ice fee of $25 will be charged f o r all d is hanared checks fA.R .S. § 44 ·6852)
SECTION 4 Appliqmls
I . Individu al Owner! Agent' s Name: ___ -'W:.::..::O.:;.L.:..F,.-____ ----'E:;R;::I;:C ______ =LA"'U;::.RE:-:;:N:..:.C=E ____ _
lasl Firsl Middle
2.0wnerName:_-'H::U~N~G:::R::Y_W:.::..::O~L.:..F~II~4,~L~L=C~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ __________ ___
(Own ership no me fo r type o f owners hi p checked o n sect jon 2)
3. Bu si ne ss Name: __ S_MA __ S_H_B_U_R_G_E_R_II_4-;:----,,--.,,. ___ -;:----:--;----;-_-:--:-_____________ _
(Exactly as It appears on the exteri o r o f p re mises)
4. Business location Address: 7625 N. ORACLE RD . 11145 ORO VALLEY AZ 85740 PI MA
(DO nol use PO Box) Street City Slate Zi p Code County
5. Mailin g Address : PO BOX 35218 TUCSON AZ 85740
(AU corresponde n ce wlll be moile d to th i s address) Street City Slate Zip Code
6. Business Phone: PENDING Daytime Contact Pho ne: (602) 616 -0983
7. Email Address : ERICWOLF@OUTLOOKCOM
8. Is th e Business located w ithin the incorporated limits of the above city or town?!KlYesD No
9. Does the Business location addre;s have a street address for a City or Town but is actually in the boundanes
of another Ci t y. Town or Tnbal Reserva tion? D Yes !lUNo
If Yes. what C ity. Town or Tr ibal Reservation is this Busi n ess lo cated in: _________________ _
to. Total Pnce paid for Senes 6 Bar, Ser ies 7 Beer & Wine 8ar or Series 9 liquor Store (license anly) $
\
N\ DeR-Qrl\nenf Use Only ~L
Fe es: --:--,--,LV~_ J2l. --::;-,TI--,"=":--:---
Application Interim Permit Si te Inspection Finger Prints Total of All fees
Is Arizona Sta tement of Cili~.enshiP & Alien Status for Sta te Senef\"S complete? D Yes D No
Accepted by: te\:::\::1.t Date: I. ill?\ll.DlLo License #
7/27/2015 page 1 of 9
Individuals requiri ng ADA accommo dations please call 1602)542-9027
License Type: Series 12 Restaurant
This non -transferable, on-sale retail privileges liquor license allows the holder of a
restaurant license to sell and serve spirituous liquor solely for consumption on the
premises of an establishment which derives at least forty percent (40%) of its gross
revenue from the sale of food. Failure to meet the 40% food requirement shall result in
revocation of the license .
Town Council Regular Session Item # 2.
Meeting Date:03/02/2016
Requested by: Julie Bower Submitted By:Mike Standish, Town
Clerk's Office
Department:Town Clerk's Office
Information
SUBJECT:
*PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING AN
APPLICATION FOR A SERIES 7 (BEER & WINE BAR) AND SERIES 12
(RESTAURANT) LIQUOR LICENSE FOR GASLIGHT MUSIC HALL, LOCATED AT
13005 N. ORACLE RD. #110
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of these two liquor licenses to the Arizona Department of
Liquor Licenses and Control for the following reasons:
1. No protests to these licenses have been received.
2. The necessary background investigation was conducted by the Police Department.
3. The Police Department has no objection to the approval of the Series 7 and Series 12
Liquor Licenses.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application for an interim permit and transfer of a Series 7 (Beer & Wine Bar) Liquor
License and a new Series 12 (Restaurant) Liquor License has been submitted by owner
Anthony Terry Jr. for Gaslight Music Hall located at 13005 N. Oracle Rd. #110.
Mr. Terry has submitted all necessary paperwork to the Town of Oro Valley and the
Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and has paid all related fees
associated with applying for the liquor licenses ($1,000 Application Processing Fee -
$500 per Application).
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
Series 7
Series 7
The beer and wine bar (series 7) liquor license is a "quota" license available only through
the Liquor License Lottery or for purchase on the open market. Once issued, this liquor
license is transferable from person to person and/or location to location within the same
county and allows the holder both on- & off-sale retail privileges. This license allows a
beer and wine bar retailer to sell and serve beer and wine (no other spirituous liquors),
primarily by individual portions, to be consumed on the premises and in the original
container for consumption on or off the premises. A retailer with off-sale ("To Go")
privileges may deliver spirituous liquor off of the licensed premises in connection with a
retail sale. A.R.S. 4-206.01.F. states that after January 1, 2011, the off-sale privileges
associated with a bar license shall be limited to no more than 30% of the total annual
sales receipts of liquor by the licensee at that location. Off-sale ("To Go") package sales
can be made on the bar premises as long as the area of off-sale operation does not
utilize a separate entrance and exit from the one provided for the bar. Payment must be
made no later than the time of delivery. Internet sale of liquor is not permitted in the state
of Arizona. Liquor must be delivered to an Arizona liquor-licensed wholesaler, then an
Arizona liquor-licensed retailer prior to delivery to the consumer.
Series 12
This non-transferable, on-sale retail privileges liquor license allows the holder of a
restaurant license to sell and serve spirituous liquor solely for consumption on the
premises of an establishment, which derives at least 40% of its gross revenue from the
sale of food. Failure to meet the 40% food requirement shall result in revocation of the
license.
In accordance with Section 4-201 of the Arizona Revised Statutes, the application was
posted for 20 days on the premises of the applicant's property, ending February 23,
2016. No protests were received during this time period.
Police Chief Daniel Sharp completed a standard background check on Gaslight Music
Hall and owner Anthony Terry Jr. and Chief Sharp has no objection to the approval of the
Series 7 (Beer & Wine Bar) and Series 12 (Restaurant) Licenses.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Per Ordinance No. (O)11-16, the Town of Oro Valley charges a $500 liquor license
application processing fee to cover the costs incurred by the Town to process the
application.
Per Section 8-2-6 Schedule of the Oro Valley Town Code, persons licensed by the State
of Arizona to deal in spirituous liquor within the Town shall pay an annual license fee of
$80.00 to the Town.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to (recommend or deny) approval of an interim permit and transfer of a Series 7
I MOVE to (recommend or deny) approval of an interim permit and transfer of a Series 7
Liquor License and approval of a new Series 12 Liquor License to the Arizona
Department of Liquor Licenses and Control for Anthony Terry Jr. for Gaslight Music Hall,
located at 13005 N. Oracle Rd. #110.
Attachments
Gaslight Music Hall Series 7 & 12 Liquor Licenses
TO: M ike Standish
FROM : ~Dani e l G. S harp
D ATE: 23 Feb ruary 20 16
DANIEL G. SHARP
CHIEF OF POLIC E
RE: Background In ves tigation , Application for Liquor Lice n se
Gas li g ht Music Hall , 13005 N. Oracl e Rd. #110
Owner / Agent Anthony Terr y Jr
On Feb ruar y 23, 20 16 , th e Oro Valley police Department completed th e s tandard
background in ves tigation on the Gas li g ht Music Hall , to include O w ner / Agent Anthony
T erry Jr.
The Oro Va ll ey Poli ce Department ha s no objectio n s for the iss uanc e of a liqu or
li cense to the Gas li ght Music Hall , 13005 N. Oracle Rd. #110
11000 N. La Canada Drive· Oro Valley, AZ 85737
Phone 520-229-4900 • Fax 520-229-4979 • www.ovpd.org
r
( .
FEB 1'16 PM 2:37 TOV
'·l br-lQh\ ?C,-~ Liqr, Lie. PM 3 :35 '\,..1, .. L..,... '
Arizona Department of liquor licenses and Control
800 W Washington 5th Floor
Phoenix. AZ85007
www.azliquor.gov
(602) 542 -5141
Application for liquor license
Type or Prillt ,with Black .Ink
SECTION 1 Th is application is for a:
JjIIJnterim Permit (Complete Section 5)
ew License Complete Sections 2. 3. 4. 13, 14, 15, 16)
~Perso n Transfer omplete Sect io n 2. 3. 4,12,13,14,16)
Location Transfer ars and Liquor stores Only)
omplete Section 2, 3, 4, 11, 13, 14. 16)
D Proba te/ Will Assignment/ Divorce Decree
(Complete Sections 2. 3, 4. 9, 13, 14 . 16)
(Fee not required)
SECTION 2 Type of Ownership:
[JJ .T.w.R.O.S. (Compiete Sectio n 6)
D lndividual (Complete Section 6)
D Port nership (Complete Section 6)
g Corpora tion (Complete Section 7)
D Limited Liability Co (Complete Sect ion 7)
Dclub (Complete Section 8)
OGovern ment (Complete Section 10)
D rust (Comple te Section 6)
D Government (Complete Sections 2, 3, 4, 10. 13, 16) o Seasonal
D ribe (Complete Section 6)
D Other (Expla in)
f · of \00 l'"'L<2> SECTION 3 Type 0 hcen ~ . <}' LICENSE # ___ -+-\'.-______________ _
.I. Type of License: * ~ -b"''''-'":\ ~ ,~ ~ ,
APPLICATION FEE AND INTERIM PERMIT FEES (IF APPLICABLE) ARE NOT REFUNDABLE
A service fee of 25 will be char ed for all dishonored checks A.R.S. 44·6852
SECTION 4 Applicants \ ~~"" \.~. ~...Qo~"-:' "I"2v'->' So { v,COC10 11
I. Individual Owner/Agent's Name:_-,. ___ .,.."',..L )------::-...,....-------;L-"-____,'C"Cc--'-'-=--1'-'---'-' ,,,--,_,
2. Owner Name:
~o ~ '= LO~ >.J L FI'~ Middle \l; \ (OJ' §?f l
(Owne rship name for type o,/\nerShiP checked on section 2)
3. Business Name: _,:".,-:::o..:"'::..:"':..~::..:.' .::c....=~~.~_~c:~.::....:.t.::~:....5=,_.:'-::...._~_L.::O":...'-=_=~=__:_____,-__,___,_------------....,._rl
(Exac tly as it appears on the exterio r 01 premises) q i D")
4. Business Loca tion Address: ,~ooS ...... OJ'>..A.'-_~ ~'3:> . .;J.. 110 ~"t. 85t:3"\ ~~A
(DO not use PO Box) siieet City Slole Zip Code County
5. Mailing Address:l...-__ _
(All corr espondence will be mailed to this address) s tr eet City Sta te Zi p Code
lS';.z..o' S2..q -\000 6. Business Phone:) Daytime Contac t Phone:
7. Email Address: \"00-":'""'-\ ~?l-"""8 Qv->:bT oFh ,-= • r-J.z\
8. Is the Business located within the incorporated limits of the above city or town?l;)aY es D No
9. Does the Business location address have a street address for a City or Town but is actually in the boundaries
of another City, Town or Tribal Reservotion? D Yes~No
If Yes. what City, Town or Tribal Reservation is t his Business located in: ___ ,....,_...:/'-....:~ ___________ ~_
1 O. Total Price paid for Series 6 Bar. Series 7 Beer & Wine Bar or Series 9 Liquor Store ( license only) $ \3,$00 .00
D!"partment Use Only
$_-----
Total of A ll Fees
Fee 5: -,---,,---,,-_
Applicalion Interim Permit Site Inspection Finger Prinls
Is Arizona Stalement o f Ci tizensh ip & Alien Status for state Benefits complete? D Yes D Na
Accepted by: Date : Li cense #
7/27/2015 page 1 of9
Individuals requiring ADA accommodations please coli (602J542·9027
FEB 8'16PM 2:23 TOU
Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control
800 W Washington 5th Floor
Phoenix, Al 85007
www.az:llquor.gov
(602) 542-5141
Application for Liquor License
Type or Print with Black Ink
~;i><!"",N~l This application is for a:
Interim Permit (Complete Section 5)
ONew license (Complete Sections 2. 3.4, t3. 14. 15. 16)
oPerson Tron sfer (Complete Section 2. 3, 4, 12.1 3.14,16)
DLocotion Transfer (Bars and liquor Stores Only)
(Complete Section 2, 3. 4. 11. 13. 14. 16)
OProbote/ Will Assignment! Divorce Decree
(Comptete Sections 2.3.4.9.13.14.16)
(Fee not required)
OGovernmen t (Complete Sections 2. 3. 4 . to. 13. 16)
D Seolonal
SECTION 2 Type of OwnerShip:
OJ.TW.R.O.S. (Co mplete Section 6)
Olndividuol (Complete Section 6)
oPortnership (Complete Section 6)
[]Corporotion (Complete Section 7)
o Limited Liability Co (Complete Section 7)
Q::lub (Complete Section 8)
OGovernment (Complete Sectio n t o)
DlUst (Complete Section 6)
OTribe (Complete Section 6)
D Ot her IExplain)
(':,1 h _'
SECTION 3 Type of license LlCENSE#~O~~\~~~O~'~2-~5~ ____________________ _
1. Type o f License: ____________________ --'-________________ _
APPLICATtON FEE AND tNTERIM PERMIT FEES (If APPLICABLE) ARE NOT REFUNDABLE
A service I of 25 will b char ed I roll dish on checks .R .S. 44-52
SECTION 4 Applicants
'1 . Individual Owner / A 9 en t' s Nome :--\:....::.;:--.r>-'---.--...-7::c':"-;---"r='-----"cc=:,,-..L.:--'----\'-;-;-;;~::--~:...:., "':;."'''"'-..::,..0=--__ _
Los! firil (jdl~
2.0wnerName: ________ ~~~~~~~~~~~~I7~-~~~------------
(Ownership name lor type of OWnefsl'llp h ko:i;J 0 ... section 2)
3. Business Nome: C ....... ~ ...... \. c.... ........ r '-' ~ \.-
4. Business locotion Addre ss: _________________________________ _
(Do not U$e PO BOll) Sked Cit; Siale zJp Code County
5. Moiling Address :,--:::c:----::--;-:--:c-:--_-:C7. __ -'-____ ---,=--____ -:::-:-___ --::---::---,--______ _
(All eorre5pondcnee wilt b. malted to thl5" QCldte.ss) Street City Sta la Zip Code
6. Business Phone: ______________ ,Doytime Contact Phone: _____________ _
7. Email Address: ____________________________________ _
8. Is the Business located within the incorporated limits of the obove city or to
9. Does the Business location address have 0 street address lor a City or Town
of onother City. Town or Tribal Reservation? D YesONo
If Yes. what City. Town or Tribal Reservation is th is Business loca ted in : __ .... -IJ-.W-Jlt-iiil!!lrll--'
10. lotol Price paid fo r Series 6 60r. Series 7 Beer & Wine Bar or Series 9 Liquor Store ( license on
Department Use Only
Fees: ___ _
AppJicol ion Interim Permit Si te Ins p e c rlon finger Prints
Is Arilono Statement o f Citizenship a. Alien S10t U5 for Siole Benefil~ completE;?c DYes DN O
Accep t ed by: Date: Li c ense #
7/2112 0 15 page 1 af 9
Individuol s re q uirin g ADA a c commodotions p le a se c all (602)542-902 7
$---,-,--,
Totol 01 All Fees
FeB l'15 PM 2:3 2 rov
Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control
800 W Washington 5th Floor
Phoenix, AZ 85007
www.azliquor.gov
(602) 542-5141
Application for Liquor License
Type or Print with Black Ink
SECTION 1 This application is for a:
_nterim Permit IComplete Section 5)
~ew License IComplete Sections 2, 3, 4, 13, 14, 15, 16)
DPerson Transfer IComplete Section 2, 3, 4, 12, 13, 14,16)
DLocation Transfer IBars and Liquor Stores Only)
IComplete Section 2, 3, 4, 11, 13, 14, 16)
DProbate/ Will Assignment/ Divorce Decree
IComplete Sections 2, 3, 4, 9, 13, 14, 16)
IFee not required)
DGovemment IComplete Sections 2, 3, 4, 10, 13, 16) o Seasonal
SECTION 2 Type of Ownership:
[]J.T.W.R.O.S . IComplete Section 6)
Dlndividual IComplete Section 6)
DPartnership IComplete Section 6)
~orporation IComplete Section 7)
DLimited Liability Co IComplete Section 7)
DClub IComplete Section 8)
OGovemment IComplete Section 10)
Orust IComplete Section 6)
Oribe IComplete Section 6)
Dother IExploin)
r~ 'J o~
SECTION 3 Type of license LICENSE #--./J:..J.du /..!<O..L'4.J.LJ..LI.J.7 __________ _
1. Type of License: __ -=~::.C-_, "2 __ -_'Z._~ __ , ._A_~_~_I'-_~_' _______________________ _
APPLICATION FEE AND INTERIM PERMIT FEES (IF APPLICABLE) ARE NOT REFUNDABLE
A service fee of nored checks A.R.S. 44-6852
SECTION 4 Applicants __ n
1. Individual Owner/Agent's Name: ___ \'-~==v-... __ ~_:_<'o'_:___::::I-------'i----' .. ~:=·-:«--\--'.'''-· _~_..,.._. ___ ~~'::':__::_'_..::....::..:....------
last -first Middle
2. Owner Name: 61>."-'''' ~O~~ I ll-.>'-.
(Ownership name for type of ownership checked on section 2)
3. Business Name: --=C::."-c:. ... _s ___ '_"'_K_ .. __ ·'-'-=c:~;;:-".:-:-:-,;;-<..:-:-:-.,-rR::::':c:A.-;;~c: .... =====c:;-_____ ...J'fJt.,;.lLJIOL..lljC)..li.J/~"'-L-__ _
(Exactly as it appears on the exterior 01 premises)
4. Business Location
(Do not use PO Box)
5. Moiling A rlrl"""
l~
(All cOlTespondence will be moiled to this address) Street City Stote lip Code
(S':>-~ ') S';zJ.1. -'000 6. Business Phone: Daytime. Contact Phone:
7. Email Address : \';; '_""'-;-~n.. C, e (I)"", ~,o Fr __ c-;o • ,.,~
8. Is the Business loca t ed within the incorporoted limits of the above city or town?;gfYesDNo
9. Does the Business location address have a street address for a City or Town but is actually in the boundaries
of another City, Town or Tribal Reservation? DYesgfNo ,,-,/A. If Yes, what City, Town or Tribal Reservation is this Business located in: _____________ ,.-____ _
10 . Tota l Price paid for Series 6 Bar, Series 7 Bee r & Wine Bar or Series 9 liquor Store I lice nse only) $ J-.o ; "'-
Department Use Only
Fees: /120 60 $ /5D
Application ' Interim Permit Site Inspection Finger Prints -=roLt:-a"l o"t-=A"'II -:Fe-e-,--
Is Arizona Statement of Citizenship & Alien Status for State Benefits complete? !?'Yes DNa
Accepted by: <jJJS Date: Li cense # 1210 L/LI/t
'015 page 1 of 9
Individuals requiring ADA accommodations please coli (602)542-9027
BEER & WINE BAR (SERIES 7)
The beer and wine bar (series 7) liquor license is a "quota" li cense
available only through the Liquor License Lottery or for purchase on the
open market. Once issued, this liquor license is transferabl e from person
to person and/or location to location within the same county and allows the
holder both on-& off-sale retail privileges. This license allows a beer and
wine bar retailer to sell and serve beer and wine (no other spirituous
liquors), primarily by individual portions, to be consumed on the premises
and in the original container for consumption on or off the premises . A
retailer with off-sale ("To Go") privileges may deliver spirituous liquor off of
the licensed premises in connection with a retail sale. A.R.S . 4-206.01.F.
states that after January 1, 2011, the off-sale privileges associated with a
bar license shall be limited to no more than 30% of the total annual sales
receipts of liquor by the licensee at that location. Off-sale ("To Go")
package sales can be made on the bar premises as long as the area of
off-sale operation does not utilize a separate entrance and exit from the
one provided for the bar. Payment must be made no later than the time of
delivery.
Restaurant (Series 12)
This non-transferable , on-sale retail privileges liquor license allows the holder of
a restaurant license to sell and serve spirituous liquor solely for consumption on
the premises of an establishment which derives at least forty percent (40%) of its
gross revenue from the sale of food. Failure to meet the 40% food requirement
shall result in revocation of the license .
Town Council Regular Session Item # 3.
Meeting Date:03/02/2016
Requested by: Stacey Lemos Submitted By:Wendy Gomez, Finance
Department:Finance
Information
SUBJECT:
FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 MID-YEAR FINANCIAL UPDATE
RECOMMENDATION:
This item is for information only.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
In the General Fund (see Attachment A), revenues collected through December totaled
$14.7 million or 45.8% of the budget amount of $32.2 million. Year-to-date expenditures
through December totaled $15.0 million or 46.7% of the budget amount of $32.1 million.
In the Highway Fund (see Attachment B), revenues collected through December totaled
$1.7 million or 52.9% of the budget amount of $3.2 million. Year-to-date expenditures
through December totaled $2.0 million or 42.1% of the budget amount of $4.9 million.
In the Bed Tax Fund (see Attachment C), revenues collected through December totaled
$420,365 or 44.3% of the budget amount of $950,000. Year-to-date expenditures
through December totaled $551,281 or 50.7% of the budget amount of $1.1 million.
Please note that expenditures through December include the budgeted transfer of
approximately $230,000 to the Municipal Debt Service Fund for debt service due on the
Aquatic Center bonds, as well as one-half of the budgeted transfer of $185,000 to the
General Fund for the Aquatic Center expansion and related operational cost increases.
In the Community Center & Golf Fund (see attachments D-1, D-2 and D-3), revenues
collected through December totaled $2.5 million or 33.7% of the budget amount of $7.4
million. Year-to-date expenditures through December totaled $3.6 million or 44.5% of the
budget amount of $8.2 million.
In the Water Utility Fund (see Attachment E), revenues collected through December
totaled $9.0 million or 52.2% of the budget amount of $17.2 million. Year-to-date
expenses through December totaled $9.5 million or 50.6% of the budget amount of
$18.8 million.
In the Stormwater Utility Fund (see Attachment F), revenues collected through
December totaled $390,652 or 47.5% of the budget amount of $822,000. Year-to-date
expenses through December totaled $407,941 or 43.9% of the budget amount of
$929,000.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
GENERAL FUND
Attachment A shows General Fund revenues and expenditures through December, as
well as year-end estimates for each category. The estimated year-end projections in the
General Fund are as follows:
Revenues $31,477,861
Less:
Expenditures ($31,384,786)
Less:
Council-Approved Use of Contingency:
- 8.8 Acre Land Purchase ($ 265,000) Approved September 2, 2015
- Lawsuit Settlement ($ 30,000) Approved September 16, 2015
- Special Election Costs ($ 24,131) Approved June 17, 2015
Est. Decrease in Fund Balance ($ 226,056)
General Fund Revenues
Please note that some of our largest recurring revenue sources in the General
Fund, including retail sales tax and state-shared sales tax are seasonal in nature;
therefore, although we are halfway through the fiscal year, we would not expect
collections to reflect 50% of the budget. These revenues typically see an increase
through the second half of the fiscal year, following collections from holiday sales
and tax return season. Actuals through the months of April/May will provide good
indication and the clearest picture of year-end figures.
Local sales tax collections in the General Fund total $6.9 million or 44.9% of the
budget amount of $15.4 million. Sales tax collections in the General Fund are
estimated to come in below budget by approximately $583,000 or 3.8% due entirely
to one-time construction sales taxes from updated projections on single family
residential building activity and slower commercial development than planned.
Single family residential permits for FY 15/16 are estimated at 165, versus 200
budgeted. This is a shortfall in one-time revenues, and because one-time revenues
are dedicated to one-time capital improvement projects, this shortfall does not
impact ongoing Town operations. All other local sales tax categories are trending on
budget. Please see Attachment H for a monthly tracking of General Fund local sales
tax collections, including retail, construction and utility sales tax.
License and permit revenues total $667,483 or 37.8% of the budget amount of $1.8
million. These revenues are estimated to come in under budget by $294,000 or
16.7% due to updated projections on residential and commercial building activity, as
referenced above.
Federal Grant revenues total $325,262 or 59.0% of the budget amount of $551,545.
These revenues are estimated to come in under budget by $84,000 or 15.2% due
primarily to recent financial changes at the Counter Narcotics Alliance (CNA). The
loss in revenue will be offset with vacancy savings in the Police Department.
State shared revenues total $5.0 million or 48.3% of the budget amount of $10.4
million, and are estimated to come in over budget by roughly $145,000 or 1.4%
based on projections from the Arizona Department of Revenue and the League of
Arizona Cities and Towns.
Charges for Services revenues total $958,588 or 51.2% of the budget amount of
$1.9 million. Charges for Services revenues are estimated to come in over budget
by nearly $100,000 or 5.3% due mostly to revenue at the Aquatic Center.
Revenues from fines total $74,251 or 61.9% of the budget amount of $120,000, and
are estimated to come in over budget by $20,000 or 16.7% based on observed
trends.
Interest income revenues are negative due to recent unrealized losses attributable
to market fluctuations in the Town's investment portfolio as interest rates move. This
activity occurs routinely in the Town's portfolio, and any realized losses and gains
are finalized and posted at year-end. Staff is projecting to end the year on budget in
this category.
Staff will continue to monitor revenue collections and may adjust the year-end estimates
based on actual trends.
General Fund Expenditures
Expenditures are estimated to come in under budget by about $688,000 or 2.1%. Of
this amount, approximately $475,000 was planned for one-time Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) projects, to be funded entirely with one-time
construction sales taxes and permitting revenues. Projects have been slowed or
placed on hold temporarily, due to the updated projections on single family
residential and commercial construction activity, as referenced above. Should
construction activity increase, these projects can be resumed and may be rolled
over into next year's budget if not completed this year. Please note that although
the Parks and Recreation Department is expected to go over budget by about
$65,000, or 2.2%, due to Aquatic Center expenditures, this overage willl be more
than offset by revenues that are also expected to exceed budget by approximately
$100,000. The remaining expenditure budget variances in other departments are
due to estimated personnel and department operating savings. Please note that
these savings are estimates and are subject to change.
HIGHWAY FUND
Highway Fund Revenues
State shared highway user funds total $1,425,779 or 47.8% of the budget amount of
$3.0 million and are expected to come in on budget at year-end. State grant
revenues are estimated at $173,341 for the fiscal year, due to reimbursements from
the Pima Association of Governments (PAG) for contract administration of roadway
projects, as well as Transportation Art by Youth (TABY) program expenditures.
Highway Fund revenues in total are estimated to come in over budget by about
$200,000 or 6.3%.
Highway Fund Expenditures
Expenditures are estimated to come in under budget by about $12,000 or 0.2% due
to anticipated personnel savings. Please note that these savings are estimates and
are subject to change.
BED TAX FUND
Bed Tax Revenues
Bed tax revenues total $421,341 or 44.6% of the budget amount of $945,000, and
are estimated to come in on budget at this time. Please note that bed tax revenues
are seasonal in nature; therefore, although we are halfway through the fiscal year,
we would not expect collections to reflect 50% of the budget. As with the General
Fund, interest income revenues are negative due to recent unrealized losses, but
are projected to come in on budget at this time.
Bed Tax Fund Expenditures
Expenditures are estimated to come in under budget by about $5,600 or 0.5% due
to projected personnel savings. Please note that these savings are estimates and
are subject to change.
COMMUNITY CENTER AND GOLF FUND
Attachment D-1 shows the consolidated financial status of the Community Center and
Golf Fund with all revenues and expenditures from Troon and Town-managed
operations.
Attachment D-2 shows the monthly line item detail for the Troon-managed operations,
specifically revenues and expenditures associated with the golf, tennis, food and
beverage and lifeguard operations. The totals in the revenue and expenditure categories
in Attachment D-2 tie to the Contracted Operating Revenues and Expenditures in
Attachment D-1.
Attachment D-3 shows the revenues and expenditures for the Troon-managed food and
beverage operations only.
Please note that the negative fund balance of $119,457 shown on Attachment G for the
Community Center & Golf Fund is projected to turn positive following an
anticipated increase in winter and spring activity for golf season and holiday sales tax
collections.
Community Center & Golf Fund Revenues
Please note that most of our revenue sources in the Community Center & Golf
Fund, including golf revenues and the half-cent sales tax are seasonal in nature;
therefore, although we are halfway through the fiscal year, we would not expect
collections to reflect 50% of the budget. These revenues are expected to see an
increase through the second half of the fiscal year, following holiday sales and tax
return season, as well as winter and spring golf season activity. Actuals through
April and May will provide good indication and the clearest picture of year-end
figures.
Revenues in the Community Center & Golf Fund total $2.5 million or 33.7% of the
budget amount of $7.4 million. Contracted operating revenues from Troon total $1.3
million and Town operating revenues total $291,590. Local sales tax revenues from
the dedicated half-cent sales tax total $897,942 or 44.9% of the budget amount of
$2,000,000.
Contracted operating revenues from Troon are estimated to come in under budget
by about $1.5 million or 31.7%, based on the updated forecast from Troon through
the remainder of the fiscal year. These revenue estimates have been revised
downward to $3.2 million from the original budgeted amount of $4.7 million based
on lower revenue trends observed in the first half of the fiscal year.
Town operating revenues are estimated to come in slightly under budget by about
$14,000 or 2.2% due to revised estimates for tennis court and facility rental income.
Community Center & Golf Fund Expenditures
Expenditures in the Community Center & Golf Fund total $3.6 million or 44.5% of
the budget amount of $8.2 million. Contracted operating expenditures from Troon
total $3.0 million and Town operating expenditures total $322,387. Capital outlay
expenditures total $280,978.
Contracted operating expenditures from Troon are estimated to come in under
budget by about $1,025,000 or 16.4%, based on the updated forecast from Troon
through the remainder of the fiscal year reflecting savings from operational changes
that were implemented in December, as well as other line item expense reductions
in the operations and maintenance categories, including closure of the golf courses
on Mondays, reduced hours at The Overlook restaurant, reductions in staffing
levels in the golf maintenance and restaurant operations, closure of the lap pool
through May and reduced hours at the tennis facilities. The year-end expenditure
estimates have been revised downward to $5.2 million from the original budgeted
amount of $6.3 million. Accordingly, the year-end net loss for the Troon-managed
operations has been revised from the budgeted amount of $1.5 million to
approximately $2.0 million.
The ending fund balance in the Community Center and Golf Fund is estimated at
$244,000.
WATER UTILITY FUND
Water Utility Fund Revenues
Charges for Services revenues are expected to come in under budget by about
$198,000 or 6.2% due to reduced water usage.
Water sales are expected to come in under budget by about $500,000 or 4.1% due
to reduced water usage.
Other Financing Sources revenue reflects anticipated Water Infrastructure Finance
Authority (WIFA) loan proceeds to complete the final phase of the Advanced Meter
Infrastructure (AMI) project. Revenues from the WIFA loan will be $500,000 less
than originally anticipated due to lower AMI project costs.
Water Utility Fund Expenses
Expenses are estimated to come in under budget by about $1.2 million or 6.4% due
to capital expenditure savings, operating savings as a result of reduced water
usage, and personnel savings. Of this $1.2 million, the AMI project will be $500,000
less than expected, which corresponds to reduced loan revenues as indicated
above. Please note that these savings are estimates and are subject to change.
STORMWATER UTILITY FUND
Stormwater Utility Fund Revenues
Revenues are estimated to come in on budget at this time.
Stormwater Utility Fund Expenses
Expenses are estimated to come in on budget at this time.
Please see Attachments A, B, and C for additional details on the General Fund, Highway
Fund and Bed Tax Fund. See Attachments D-1, D-2 and D-3 for additional details on
the Community Center & Golf Fund. See Attachment E for the Water Utility Fund and
Attachment F for the Stormwater Utility Fund. See Attachment G for a fiscal year-to-date
consolidated summary of all Town Funds. See Attachment H for a breakdown of
monthly local sales tax collections for the General Fund.
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUGGESTED MOTION:
This item is for information only.
Attachments
Attachment A - General Fund
Attachment B - Highway Fund
Attachment C - Bed Tax Fund
Attachment D-1 CC & Golf Fund
Attachment D-2 Troon Cash Flow
Attachment D-3 Troon F&B
Attachment E - Water Utility Fund
Attachment F - Stormwater Utility Fund
Attachment G - Summary All Funds
Attachment H - Gen Fund Local Sales Tax
ATTACHMENT A
December YTD Financial Status
General Fund
% Budget Completion through December --- 50%
% Actuals YE % Variance
to Budget to Budget
REVENUES:
LOCAL SALES TAX 6,898,658 15,350,654 44.9% 14,767,845 -3.8%
LICENSES & PERMITS 667,483 1,764,000 37.8% 1,469,662 -16.7%
FEDERAL GRANTS 325,262 551,545 59.0% 467,554 -15.2%
STATE GRANTS 606,302 1,434,300 42.3% 1,441,316 0.5%
STATE/COUNTY SHARED 5,035,469 10,428,531 48.3% 10,574,275 1.4%
OTHER INTERGOVERNMENTAL 49,385 105,000 47.0% 105,000 0.0%
CHARGES FOR SERVICES 958,588 1,873,834 51.2% 1,973,539 5.3%
FINES 74,251 120,000 61.9% 140,000 16.7%
INTEREST INCOME (14,052) 94,400 -14.9% 94,400 0.0%
MISCELLANEOUS 46,937 135,000 34.8% 139,271 3.2%
TRANSFERS IN 92,500 305,000 30.3%305,000 0.0%
TOTAL REVENUES 14,740,783 32,162,264 45.8% 31,477,861 -2.1%
% Actuals YE % Variance
to Budget to Budget
EXPENDITURES:
COUNCIL 114,494 211,995 54.0% 211,995 0.0%
CLERK 172,926 407,900 42.4% 372,900 -8.6%
MANAGER 367,345 769,521 47.7% 769,521 0.0%
HUMAN RESOURCES 162,202 366,775 44.2% 358,775 -2.2%
FINANCE 343,850 779,760 44.1% 735,141 -5.7%
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 812,859 1,571,326 51.7% 1,571,326 0.0%
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION 895,434 1,804,970 49.6% 1,789,027 -0.9%
LEGAL 341,514 764,837 44.7% 722,103 -5.6%
COURT 376,865 837,629 45.0% 818,829 -2.2%
DEV & INFRASTRUCTURE SVCS 2,167,525 4,596,216 47.2% 4,588,674 -0.2%
PARKS & RECREATION 1,466,286 3,004,988 48.8% 3,070,212 2.2%
POLICE 7,203,293 15,250,016 47.2% 15,144,769 -0.7%
TRANSFERS OUT 542,378 1,706,810 31.8%1,231,515 -27.8%
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 14,966,971 32,072,743 46.7% 31,384,786 -2.1%
SURPLUS / (DEFICIT) (226,188) 89,521 93,075
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 10,151,872
Plus: Surplus / (Deficit)93,075
Less:
Approved Use of Contingency Reserves during FY 15/16:
8.8 Acre Land Purchase (Proximity to JDK Park and CDO High School)(265,000)
Special Election Costs (24,131)
Lawsuit Settlement - Mora v. Town of Oro Valley (30,000)
ENDING FUND BALANCE ** 9,925,815
* Year-end estimates are subject to further revision
** Ending fund balance amounts are estimates and are subject to further revision
FY 2015/2016
Year End
Estimate *
Budget Year End
Estimate *
Actuals
thru 12/2015
Actuals
thru 12/2015
Budget
F:\BUDGET ANALYST\Financial Reports 2015-2016\2Q\Dec\Dec FY 16 Monthly Report 02/22/2016
ATTACHMENT B
December YTD Financial Status FY 2015/2016
% Budget Completion through December --- 50%
Actuals
thru 12/2015 Budget % Actuals
to Budget
Year End
Estimate *
YE % Variance
to BudgetREVENUES:
LICENSES & PERMITS 20,632 51,000 40.5% 51,000 0.0%
STATE GRANTS 151,939 - 0.0% 173,341 0.0%
STATE/COUNTY SHARED 1,425,779 2,985,464 47.8% 2,985,464 0.0%
CHARGES FOR SERVICES 67,000 134,000 50.0% 134,000 0.0%
INTEREST INCOME (2,760) 22,400 -12.3% 22,400 0.0%
MISCELLANEOUS 30,429 10,000 304.3%38,582 285.8%
TOTAL REVENUES 1,693,019 3,202,864 52.9% 3,404,787 6.3%
Actuals
thru 12/2015 Budget % Actuals
to Budget
Year End
Estimate *
YE % Variance
to Budget
EXPENDITURES:
ADMINISTRATION 518,510 880,396 58.9% 880,396 0.0%
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING 269,512 561,772 48.0% 564,138 0.4%
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT 467,063 1,473,581 31.7% 1,473,581 0.0%
STREET MAINTENANCE 542,294 1,159,510 46.8% 1,145,256 -1.2%
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 245,784 783,419 31.4%783,419 0.0%
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,043,163 4,858,678 42.1% 4,846,790 -0.2%
SURPLUS / (DEFICIT) (350,144) (1,655,814) (1,442,003)
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 3,291,083
Plus: Surplus / (Deficit)(1,442,003)
ENDING FUND BALANCE **1,849,080
* Year-end estimates are subject to further revision
** Ending fund balance amounts are estimates and are subject to further revision
Highway Fund
F:\BUDGET ANALYST\Financial Reports 2015-2016\2Q\Dec\Dec FY 16 Monthly Report 02/22/2016
ATTACHMENT C
December YTD Financial Status
% Budget Completion through December --- 50%
% Actuals YE % Variance
to Budget to Budget
REVENUES:
BED TAXES 421,341 945,000 44.6% 945,000 0.0%
INTEREST INCOME (976) 4,800 -20.3%4,800 0.0%
TOTAL REVENUES 420,365 949,800 44.3% 949,800 0.0%
% Actuals YE % Variance
to Budget to Budget
EXPENDITURES:
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 229,237 672,732 34.1% 667,104 -0.8%
TRANSFERS OUT 322,044 414,544 77.7%414,544 0.0%
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 551,281 1,087,276 50.7% 1,081,648 -0.5%
SURPLUS / (DEFICIT) (130,916) (137,476) (131,848)
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 464,626
Plus: Surplus / (Deficit)(131,848)
ENDING FUND BALANCE **332,778
* Year-end estimates are subject to further revision
** Ending fund balance amounts are estimates and are subject to further revision
FY 2015/2016
Year End
Estimate *
Budget Year End
Estimate *
Bed Tax Fund
Budget Actuals
thru 12/2015
Actuals
thru 12/2015
F:\BUDGET ANALYST\Financial Reports 2015-2016\2Q\Dec\Dec FY 16 Monthly Report 02/22/2016
ATTACHMENT D-1
December YTD Financial Status
% Budget Completion through December --- 50%
% Actuals YE % Variance
to Budget to Budget
REVENUES:
CONTRACTED OPERATING REVENUES
Golf Revenues 350,246 1,771,106 19.8% 1,125,182 -36.5%
Member Dues (Golf) 409,355 1,370,867 29.9% 1,006,355 -26.6%
Tennis Revenues 163,973 279,837 58.6% 306,193 9.4%
Food & Beverage 260,440 850,852 30.6% 600,918 -29.4%
Merchandise & Other 102,263 469,671 21.8%201,823 -57.0%
1,286,277 4,742,333 27.1% 3,240,471 -31.7%
TOWN OPERATING REVENUES
Daily Drop-Ins 9,822 27,550 35.7% 27,550 0.0%
Member Dues 255,172 526,480 48.5% 526,480 0.0%
Recreation Programs 25,160 84,000 30.0% 84,000 0.0%
Tennis Court Rentals - 7,200 0.0% 4,000 -44.4%
Facility Rental Income 686 13,200 5.2% 1,000 -92.4%
Concession Sales 750 - 0.0%1,000 0.0%
291,590 658,430 44.3% 644,030 -2.2%
OTHER REVENUES
Local Sales Tax 897,942 2,000,000 44.9% 2,000,000 0.0%
Real Property Rental Income 18,574 - 27,861 0.0%
Donations 100 - 0.0%100 0.0%
916,616 2,000,000 45.8% 2,027,961 1.4%
TOTAL REVENUES 2,494,483 7,400,763 33.7% 5,912,462 -20.1%
% Actuals YE % Variance
to Budget to Budget
EXPENDITURES:
CONTRACTED OPERATING EXPENDITURES
Personnel 1,265,837 2,638,457 48.0% 2,177,016 -17.5%
Operations & Maintenance 1,550,149 3,289,219 47.1% 2,795,244 -15.0%
Equipment Leases 219,810 333,000 66.0%263,912 -20.7%
3,035,796 6,260,676 48.5% 5,236,172 -16.4%
TOWN OPERATING EXPENDITURES
Personnel 239,842 462,517 51.9% 462,517 0.0%
Operations & Maintenance 82,545 225,140 36.7%225,140 0.0%
322,387 687,657 46.9% 687,657 0.0%
CAPITAL OUTLAY 280,978 1,115,000 25.2% 650,000 -41.7%
TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND - 120,000 0.0% 120,000 0.0%
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 3,639,162 8,183,333 44.5% 6,693,829 -18.2%
SURPLUS / (DEFICIT) (1,144,679) (782,570) (781,367)
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 1,025,222
Plus: Surplus / (Deficit)(781,367)
ENDING FUND BALANCE **243,855
* Year-end estimates are subject to further revision
** Ending fund balance amounts are estimates and are subject to further revision
FY 2015/2016
Actuals
thru 12/2015 Budget Year End
Estimate *
Community Center & Golf Fund
Actuals
thru 12/2015 Budget Year End
Estimate *
F:\BUDGET ANALYST\Financial Reports 2015-2016\2Q\Dec\Dec FY 16 Monthly Report 02/22/2016
ATTACHMENT D-2
TR
O
O
N
El
C
o
n
q
u
i
s
t
a
d
o
r
C
a
s
h
F
l
o
w
S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
A ct
u
a
l
A ct
u
a
l
A ct
u
a
l
A ct
u
a
l
A ct
u
a
l
A ct
u
a
l
A ct
u
a
l
O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
B
u
d
g
e
t
F
o
r
e
c
a
s
t
Ju
l
-
1
5
A ug
-
1
5
S
e
p
-
1
5
O
c
t
-
1
5
N
o
v
-
1
5
D
e
c
-
1
5
T OT
A
L
T OT
A
L
T OTAL
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
:
Go
l
f
F
e
e
s
,
n
e
t
o
f
d
i
s
c
o
u
n
t
s
31
,
1
2
7
2
6
,
5
5
5
4
1
,
9
2
2
3
9
,
6
9
2
7
9
,
9
8
5
4
8
,
1
8
4
2
6
7
,
4
6
5
1
,
4
5
6
,
2
7
1
8
6
7
,
4
5
9
Tr
a
i
l
F
e
e
s
&
M
e
m
b
e
r
C
a
r
t
F
e
e
s
9,
9
7
0
8
,
9
9
4
9
,
8
0
0
1
0
,
8
6
0
1
3
,
1
3
9
1
3
,
1
0
5
6
5
,
8
6
8
1
8
0
,
0
0
0
1
8
1
,
2
6
8
Go
l
f
-
G
r
o
u
p
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
-
-
-
(
5
5
0
)
6
0
1
5
1
(
3
3
9
)
-
(
3
3
9
)
Ra
n
g
e
,
R
e
n
t
a
l
s
,
O
t
h
e
r
G
o
l
f
r
e
l
a
t
e
d
1,
3
6
8
1
,
5
9
3
1
,
9
8
4
2
,
7
1
2
2
,
8
3
9
2
,
4
7
9
1
2
,
9
7
5
1
2
7
,
7
3
5
6
8
,
1
7
2
Go
l
f
L
e
s
s
o
n
s
7
8
5
5
1
0
1
,
1
1
5
6
8
0
8
4
7
3
4
0
4
,
2
7
7
7
,
1
0
0
8
,
6
2
2
To
t
a
l
M
e
m
b
e
r
D
u
e
s
65
,
3
7
7
5
7
,
7
8
6
6
4
,
7
1
9
6
9
,
9
7
0
7
5
,
8
0
6
7
5
,
6
9
7
4
0
9
,
3
5
5
1
,
3
7
0
,
8
6
7
1
,
0
0
6
,
3
5
5
Ot
h
e
r
M
e
m
b
e
r
I
n
c
o
m
e
6
0
6
0
-
6
0
Sw
i
m
/
T
e
n
n
i
s
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
2
4
,
9
2
3
9
,
1
7
2
2
7
,
5
9
3
5
1
,
5
4
3
2
6
,
8
7
1
2
3
,
8
7
1
1
6
3
,
9
7
3
2
7
9
,
8
3
7
3
0
6
,
1
9
3
Sa
l
o
n
/
S
p
a
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
-
1
5
0
4
0
0
-
-
-
5
5
0
-
5
5
0
GO
L
F
P
U
S
C
H
R
I
D
G
E
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
-
2
0
-
-
-
-
2
0
-
8
0
Me
r
c
h
a
n
d
i
s
e
,
n
e
t
o
f
d
i
s
c
o
u
n
t
s
1
1
,
1
1
2
9
,
3
4
2
1
2
,
4
6
2
1
7
,
5
5
5
2
4
,
6
3
8
2
6
,
5
2
4
1
0
1
,
6
3
3
4
6
9
,
6
7
1
2
0
1
,
1
3
3
Fo
o
d
a
n
d
B
e
v
e
r
a
g
e
,
n
e
t
o
f
d
i
s
c
o
u
n
t
s
3
4
,
0
0
2
2
9
,
4
3
0
3
5
,
0
7
7
4
4
,
4
8
1
6
5
,
7
0
5
5
1
,
7
4
5
2
6
0
,
4
4
0
8
5
0
,
8
5
2
6
0
0
,
9
1
8
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
1
7
8
,
6
6
4
1
4
3
,
5
5
2
1
9
5
,
0
7
2
2
3
6
,
9
4
3
2
8
9
,
8
9
0
2
4
2
,
1
5
6
1
,
2
8
6
,
2
7
7
4
,
7
4
2
,
3
3
3
3
,
2
4
0
,
4
7
1
C
o
s
t
o
f
S
a
l
e
s
:
CO
S
-
G
o
l
f
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
7
,
6
9
0
7
,
4
1
0
CO
S
-
G
o
l
f
L
e
s
s
o
n
s
6
9
2
2
8
2
1
0
0
9
3
7
5
4
6
5
5
6
3
,
1
1
3
5
,
6
8
0
6
,
5
8
9
CO
S
-
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
s
1
4
,
2
6
8
1
0
,
0
2
3
1
4
,
4
7
7
2
1
,
7
8
3
1
6
,
5
1
6
1
2
,
4
7
7
8
9
,
5
4
4
1
6
1
,
7
9
1
1
7
2
,
5
8
0
CO
S
-
M
e
r
c
h
a
n
d
i
s
e
,
n
e
t
o
f
d
i
s
c
o
u
n
t
s
9
,
8
7
7
5
,
5
1
7
6
,
3
3
5
1
0
,
1
9
6
1
6
,
9
3
1
1
8
,
0
0
7
6
6
,
8
6
3
2
9
9
,
5
2
7
1
4
6
,
4
6
3
CO
S
-
F
o
o
d
&
B
e
v
e
r
a
g
e
1
4
,
1
7
2
1
1
,
4
8
4
1
5
,
1
5
0
1
4
,
8
7
5
2
6
,
9
1
7
1
6
,
1
9
5
9
8
,
7
9
3
2
6
7
,
4
1
8
2
0
7
,
7
4
6
To
t
a
l
C
o
s
t
o
f
S
a
l
e
s
3
9
,
0
0
9
2
7
,
3
0
6
3
6
,
0
6
2
4
7
,
7
9
1
6
0
,
9
1
0
4
7
,
2
3
5
2
5
8
,
3
1
3
7
5
2
,
1
0
5
5
4
0
,
7
8
8
Gr
o
s
s
P
r
o
f
i
t
1
3
9
,
6
5
5
1
1
6
,
2
4
6
1
5
9
,
0
1
0
1
8
9
,
1
5
2
2
2
8
,
9
8
0
1
9
4
,
9
2
1
1
,
0
2
7
,
9
6
4
3
,
9
9
0
,
2
2
8
2
,
6
9
9
,
6
8
3
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
E
x
p
e
n
s
e
s
:
Pa
y
r
o
l
l
1
9
3
,
3
2
5
1
8
2
,
6
9
4
1
7
2
,
7
3
1
1
9
3
,
5
1
4
1
5
9
,
4
6
6
1
1
4
,
4
6
0
1
,
0
1
6
,
1
9
0
2
,
1
8
2
,
8
5
9
1
,
7
4
6
,
1
9
0
Em
p
l
o
y
e
e
B
e
n
e
f
i
t
s
4
0
,
6
3
0
3
8
,
5
3
1
4
5
,
4
6
6
3
1
,
7
2
9
3
5
,
8
7
9
3
4
,
3
6
6
2
2
6
,
6
0
1
4
0
6
,
3
1
4
3
7
9
,
6
0
1
Em
p
l
o
y
e
e
R
e
l
a
t
e
d
5
,
6
4
4
3
,
8
7
3
3
,
2
0
4
3
,
1
8
7
3
,
7
0
0
3
,
4
3
8
2
3
,
0
4
6
4
9
,
2
8
4
5
1
,
2
2
5
Pr
o
f
e
s
s
i
o
n
a
l
F
e
e
s
-
-
3
0
6
1
0
-
-
3
1
6
3
,
9
7
5
3
,
7
4
1
A dv
e
r
t
i
s
i
n
g
&
M
a
r
k
e
t
i
n
g
5
,
2
1
3
2
,
3
5
9
1
4
,
3
1
8
5
,
7
2
5
8
,
9
8
7
3
6
,
6
0
2
7
7
,
7
6
8
6
5
,
6
9
7
Co
m
p
E
x
p
e
n
s
e
-
3
,
3
4
0
-
-
-
-
3
,
3
4
0
-
3
,
3
4
0
Re
p
a
i
r
&
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
5
3
,
8
1
7
6
1
,
6
6
2
8
4
,
3
5
3
8
2
,
9
0
3
3
2
,
5
2
0
2
0
,
8
3
3
3
3
6
,
0
8
8
4
8
8
,
0
5
0
4
9
0
,
5
1
2
Op
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
E
x
p
e
n
s
e
s
2
7
,
6
2
7
2
5
,
8
5
8
2
0
,
4
7
8
2
1
,
4
8
8
1
8
,
5
7
6
2
4
,
9
2
2
1
3
8
,
9
4
9
4
1
3
,
7
9
1
2
7
5
,
8
0
8
To
t
a
l
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
E
x
p
e
n
s
e
s
3
2
6
,
2
5
6
3
1
5
,
9
5
8
3
2
8
,
8
9
7
3
4
7
,
1
4
9
2
5
5
,
8
6
6
2
0
7
,
0
0
6
1
,
7
8
1
,
1
3
2
3
,
6
2
2
,
0
4
1
3
,
0
1
6
,
1
1
4
Op
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
P
r
o
f
i
t
(
1
8
6
,
6
0
1
)
(
1
9
9
,
7
1
2
)
(
1
6
9
,
8
8
7
) (
1
5
7
,
9
9
7
) (
2
6
,
8
8
6
)
(
1
2
,
0
8
5
)
(
7
5
3
,
1
6
8
)
3
6
8
,
1
8
6
(
3
1
6
,
4
3
1
)
Le
a
s
e
s
-
C
a
r
t
s
1
6
,
4
4
0
1
6
,
4
4
0
1
6
,
3
6
4
1
6
,
3
6
4
8
,
3
7
7
1
6
,
3
6
4
9
0
,
3
4
9
1
0
5
,
0
0
0
1
4
0
,
6
1
1
Le
a
s
e
s
-
E
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
19
,
6
0
5
2
2
,
3
5
7
5
,
1
6
3
(
4
,
3
2
4
)
-
-
4
2
,
8
0
1
2
2
8
,
0
0
0
1
2
3
,
3
0
1
Ut
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
1
6
8
,
4
7
2
1
4
1
,
5
8
9
1
4
8
,
5
6
7
1
3
4
,
2
5
9
3
9
,
1
2
0
6
4
,
9
1
0
6
9
6
,
9
1
7
1
,
3
2
0
,
3
9
1
1
,
2
6
1
,
4
3
7
Fi
x
e
d
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
E
x
p
e
n
s
e
s
2
0
4
,
5
1
7
1
8
0
,
3
8
6
1
7
0
,
0
9
4
1
4
6
,
2
9
9
4
7
,
4
9
7
8
1
,
2
7
4
8
3
0
,
0
6
7
1
,
6
5
3
,
3
9
1
1
,
5
2
5
,
3
4
9
Gr
o
s
s
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
P
r
o
f
i
t
(
3
9
1
,
1
1
8
)
(
3
8
0
,
0
9
8
)
(
3
3
9
,
9
8
1
) (
3
0
4
,
2
9
6
) (
7
4
,
3
8
3
)
(
9
3
,
3
5
9
)
(
1
,
5
8
3
,
2
3
5
)
(
1
,
2
8
5
,
2
0
5
)
(
1
,
8
4
1
,
7
8
0
)
In
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
-
8
6
-
8
6
8
6
8
6
3
4
4
8
5
,
5
2
0
3
4
4
Pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
T
a
x
e
s
-
-
1
,
0
1
1
-
-
3
,
6
0
1
4
,
6
1
2
-
4
,
6
1
2
Fe
e
s
,
P
e
r
m
i
t
s
&
L
i
c
e
n
s
e
s
9
2
5
0
8
6
8
0
-
1
4
0
5
6
5
3
,
6
1
9
2
,
8
6
2
Ba
s
e
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
F
e
e
s
1
2
,
0
0
0
1
2
,
0
0
0
1
2
,
0
0
0
1
2
,
0
0
0
1
2
,
0
0
0
1
2
,
0
0
0
7
2
,
0
0
0
1
4
4
,
0
0
0
1
4
4
,
0
0
0
Ba
d
D
e
b
t
-
1
,
0
8
0
2
7
0
6
0
0
-
1
5
3
2
,
1
0
3
-
2
,
1
0
3
To
t
a
l
O
t
h
e
r
E
x
p
e
n
s
e
s
1
2
,
0
0
9
1
3
,
4
1
6
1
3
,
3
6
7
1
2
,
7
6
6
1
2
,
0
8
6
1
5
,
9
8
0
7
9
,
6
2
4
2
3
3
,
1
3
9
1
5
3
,
9
2
1
Ne
t
I
n
c
o
m
e
(
L
o
s
s
)
(
4
0
3
,
1
2
9
)
(
3
9
3
,
5
1
4
)
(
3
5
3
,
3
4
8
) (
3
1
7
,
0
6
2
) (
8
6
,
4
6
9
)
(
1
0
9
,
3
3
9
)
(
1
,
6
6
2
,
8
6
1
)
(
1
,
5
1
8
,
3
4
3
)
(
1
,
9
9
5
,
7
0
1
)
02/22/2016
ATTACHMENT D-3
ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET
MONTH MONTH Y-T-D Y-T-D
FOOD & BEVERAGE REVENUE 51,745 95,004 260,340 387,150
TOTAL REVENUES 51,745 95,004 260,340 387,150
COST OF SALES 16,195 30,088 98,794 124,018
PAYROLL & BENEFITS 40,522 42,564 273,883 230,470
OPERATING EXPENSES 8,915 7,485 50,433 44,990
NET INCOME (LOSS) (13,887) 14,867 (162,770) (12,328)
EL CONQUISTADOR
INCOME STATEMENT CONSOLIDATED - RESTAURANT/GRILLE - DECEMBER 2015
02/22/2016
ATTACHMENT E
December YTD Financial Status FY 2015/2016
Water Utility Fund
% Budget Completion through December --- 50%
% Actuals YE % Variance
to Budget to Budget
REVENUES:
CHARGES FOR SERVICES 1,583,085 3,184,200 49.7% 2,986,000 -6.2%
INTEREST INCOME (11,348) 59,520 -19.1% 59,520 0.0%
MISCELLANEOUS 12,013 - 0.0% 12,013 0.0%
WATER SALES 6,248,870 12,160,500 51.4% 11,661,000 -4.1%
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 1,152,487 1,800,000 64.0%1,300,000 -27.8%
TOTAL REVENUES 8,985,107 17,204,220 52.2% 16,018,533 -6.9%
% Actuals YE % Variance
to Budget to Budget
EXPENSES:
ADMINISTRATION 7,114,306 12,727,316 55.9% 12,114,547 -4.8%
ENGINEERING AND PLANNING 502,841 2,342,476 21.5% 1,959,796 -16.3%
PRODUCTION 1,481,542 2,788,464 53.1% 2,627,036 -5.8%
DISTRIBUTION 428,276 928,884 46.1% 902,010 -2.9%
OTHER FINANCING USES 3,030 33,030 9.2%3,030 -90.8%
TOTAL EXPENSES 9,529,995 18,820,170 50.6% 17,606,419 -6.4%
SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) (544,888) (1,615,950) (1,587,886)
Excludes non-cash outlays for depreciation & amortization
* Year-end estimates are subject to further revision
Year End
Estimate *
Budget Year End
Estimate *
Actuals
thru 12/2015
Actuals
thru 12/2015
Budget
F:\BUDGET ANALYST\Financial Reports 2015-2016\2Q\Dec\Dec FY16 Fund Update_Water Utility Fund 02/22/2016
ATTACHMENT F
December YTD Financial Status FY 2015/2016
Stormwater Utility Fund
% Budget Completion through December -- 50%
Actuals
thru 12/2015 Budget
% Actuals
to Budget
Year End
Estimate *
YE % Variance
to Budget
REVENUES:
STATE GRANTS 3,233 35,000 0.0% 35,000 0.0%
CHARGES FOR SERVICES 387,216 787,000 49.2% 787,000 0.0%
INTEREST INCOME 203 250 81.0%250 0.0%
TOTAL REVENUES 390,652 822,250 47.5% 822,250 0.0%
Actuals
thru 12/2015 Budget % Actuals
to Budget
Year End
Estimate *
YE % Variance
to BudgetEXPENSES:
PERSONNEL 168,902 346,620 48.7% 346,620 0.0%
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE 174,368 491,995 35.4% 491,995 0.0%
CAPITAL 64,671 90,500 71.5%90,500 0.0%
TOTAL EXPENSES 407,941 929,115 43.9% 929,115 0.0%
SURPLUS / (DEFICIT) (17,289) (106,865) (106,865)
Excludes non-cash outlays for depreciation
* Year-end estimates are subject to further revision
F:\BUDGET ANALYST\Financial Reports 2015-2016\2Q\Dec\Dec FY16 Fund Update_SW Utility Fund 02/22/2016
ATTACHMENT G
Co
n
s
o
l
i
d
a
t
e
d
Y
e
a
r
-
t
o
-
D
a
t
e
F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
R
e
p
o
r
t
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
,
2
0
1
5
FY 2015/201 6
FY
1
5
/
1
6
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
L
e
a
s
e
s
/
Left in Accounts
Be
g
i
n
B
a
l
.
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
O
u
t
Thru Dec 2015
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
-
Un
a
s
s
i
g
n
e
d
8
,
5
9
7
,
8
7
3
1
4
,
6
4
8
,
2
8
3
9
2
,
5
0
0
1
4
,
7
4
0
,
7
8
3
5
4
2
,
3
7
8
1
0
,
9
0
4
,
5
2
7
3
,
4
6
2
,
9
6
9
5
7
,
0
9
7
- - 14,966,971 8,371,685
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
-
A
s
s
i
g
n
e
d
1
,
5
5
3
,
9
9
9
- 1,553,999
Hi
g
h
w
a
y
F
u
n
d
-
R
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
e
d
3
,
2
9
1
,
0
8
3
1
,
6
9
3
,
0
1
9
-
1
,
6
9
3
,
0
1
9
2
2
8
,
3
6
6
9
1
0
,
9
2
4
3
0
1
,
9
3
6
6
0
1
,
9
3
7
- - 2,043,163 2,940,939
Se
i
z
u
r
e
&
F
o
r
f
e
i
t
u
r
e
-
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
/
S
t
a
t
e
2
3
5
,
9
5
2
4
6
,
3
4
2
-
4
6
,
3
4
2
-
1
0
1
,
5
4
2
9
,
6
8
0
1
7
,
3
1
2
- - 128,534 153,760
Be
d
T
a
x
F
u
n
d
-
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
d
4
6
4
,
6
2
6
4
2
0
,
3
6
5
-
4
2
0
,
3
6
5
3
2
2
,
0
4
4
1
1
6
,
3
9
8
1
1
2
,
8
3
9
-
- - 551,281 333,710
Im
p
o
u
n
d
F
e
e
F
u
n
d
2
8
,
4
3
5
2
7
,
0
0
0
-
2
7
,
0
0
0
-
1
3
,
7
3
2
-
-
- - 13,732 41,703
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
&
G
o
l
f
F
u
n
d
1
,
0
2
5
,
2
2
2
2
,
4
9
4
,
4
8
3
-
2
,
4
9
4
,
4
8
3
2
1
9
,
8
1
0
2
3
9
,
8
4
2
2
,
8
9
8
,
5
3
1
2
8
0
,
9
7
8
- - 3,639,162 (119,457)
Mu
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
D
e
b
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
F
u
n
d
1
6
6
,
7
9
8
9
2
,
1
2
0
6
5
5
,
7
5
0
7
4
7
,
8
7
0
-
-
5
3
,
7
7
1
-
- 711,153 764,924 149,744
Or
a
c
l
e
R
o
a
d
D
e
b
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
F
u
n
d
1
,
9
4
6
1
5
9
,
3
9
2
3
,
0
0
0
1
6
2
,
3
9
2
-
-
-
-
- 156,561 156,561 7,777
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
W
a
t
e
r
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
D
e
v
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
F
u
n
d
4
,
0
2
1
,
7
9
3
4
0
4
,
4
3
8
-
4
0
4
,
4
3
8
-
-
4
0
,
9
0
6
1
7
4
- - 41,080 4,385,151
Po
t
a
b
l
e
W
a
t
e
r
S
y
s
t
e
m
D
e
v
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
F
u
n
d
4
,
8
0
0
,
1
5
3
2
0
1
,
7
2
0
-
2
0
1
,
7
2
0
-
-
-
-
- - - 5,001,873
To
w
n
w
i
d
e
R
o
a
d
w
a
y
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
en
t
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
F
u
n
d
2
,
6
7
7
,
8
5
2
2
4
2
,
0
2
0
-
2
4
2
,
0
2
0
-
-
-
4
7
,
4
3
1
- - 47,431 2,872,440
Pa
r
k
s
&
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
F
u
n
d
1
3
6
,
1
0
3
6
5
,
0
3
9
-
6
5
,
0
3
9
-
-
-
-
- - - 201,142
Li
b
r
a
r
y
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
F
u
n
d
9
4
,
7
9
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
9
,
4
6
5
- - 19,465 75,333
Po
l
i
c
e
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
F
u
n
d
2
5
4
,
5
7
7
3
1
,
0
5
2
-
3
1
,
0
5
2
-
-
-
-
- - - 285,629
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
F
u
n
d
3
,
5
0
5
3
-
3
-
-
-
-
- - - 3,508
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
C
I
P
F
u
n
d
1
,
4
2
1
,
5
9
3
-
3
4
4
,
5
6
8
3
4
4
,
5
6
8
-
-
-
1
,
1
9
3
,
2
8
8
- - 1,193,288 572,873
PA
G
/
R
T
A
F
u
n
d
-
2
,
3
1
8
,
1
1
4
-
2
,
3
1
8
,
1
1
4
-
2
1
,
9
5
7
-
1
,
9
5
8
,
2
2
1
- - 1,980,178 337,936
Wa
t
e
r
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
13
,
8
6
4
,
3
5
9
8
,
9
8
5
,
1
0
7
-
8
,
9
8
5
,
1
0
7
3
,
0
3
0
1
,
4
1
9
,
2
5
5
3
,
2
6
2
,
8
7
9
1
,
5
4
2
,
7
3
8
- 3,302,093 9,529,995 13,319,471
St
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
27
9
,
3
5
3
3
9
0
,
6
5
2
-
3
9
0
,
6
5
2
-
1
6
8
,
9
0
2
1
7
4
,
3
6
8
6
4
,
6
7
1
- - 407,941 262,064
Fl
e
e
t
F
u
n
d
2
9
8
,
9
2
2
5
2
1
,
7
2
2
-
5
2
1
,
7
2
2
-
4
3
,
1
5
5
2
6
2
,
6
3
9
1
2
3
,
7
6
4
- - 429,557 391,087
Be
n
e
f
i
t
S
e
l
f
I
n
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
F
u
n
d
2
4
4
,
1
6
2
1
,
3
4
3
,
4
6
7
-
1
,
3
4
3
,
4
6
7
-
-
1
,
3
7
9
,
4
7
2
-
- - 1,379,472 208,157
Re
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
I
n
-
L
i
e
u
F
e
e
F
u
n
d
6
,
1
9
0
2
1
,
7
2
8
-
2
1
,
7
2
8
-
-
-
-
- - - 27,918
To
t
a
l
4
3
,
4
6
9
,
2
9
4
3
4
,
1
0
6
,
0
6
5
1
,
0
9
5
,
8
1
8
3
5
,
2
0
1
,
8
8
4
1
,
3
1
5
,
6
2
8
1
3
,
9
4
0
,
2
3
4
1
1
,
9
5
9
,
9
8
8
5
,
9
0
7
,
0
7
7
- 4,169,807 37,292,735 41,378,444
Fu
n
d
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
Ot
h
e
r
F
i
n
So
u
r
c
e
s
/
T
f
r
s
To
t
a
l
I
n
Debt Service
T
o
t
a
l
O
u
t
Pe
r
s
o
n
n
e
l
O
&
M
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
C
o
n
t
i
n
g
e
n
c
y
F:
\
B
U
D
G
E
T
A
N
A
L
Y
S
T
\
F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
R
e
p
o
r
t
s
2
0
1
5
-
2
0
1
6
\
2
Q
\
D
e
c
\
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
G
-
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
A
l
l
F
u
n
d
s
02/22/2016
ATTACHMENT H
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
L
o
c
a
l
S
a
l
e
s
T
a
x
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
FY 2015/201 6
CA
T
E
G
O
R
Y
J
U
L
Y
A
U
G
S
E
P
O
C
T
N
O
V
D
E
C
J
A
N
F
E
B
M
A
R AP R MAY
J
U
N
E
T
O
T
A
L
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
S
a
l
e
s
T
a
x
1
9
3
,
4
9
7
1
6
0
,
7
5
9
1
9
0
,
8
1
2
2
3
4
,
7
6
3
2
2
2
,
5
4
8
2
5
4
,
3
0
7
1,256,686
Ut
i
l
i
t
y S
a
l
e
s
T
a
x
2
5
7
,
5
5
2
3
1
2
,
4
9
4
3
0
4
,
6
6
6
2
8
6
,
6
6
7
2
4
3
,
8
2
7
1
9
5
,
3
4
5
1,600,550
Re
t
a
i
l
S
a
l
e
s
T
a
x
4
4
1
,
5
5
7
4
1
5
,
2
0
9
3
9
3
,
6
9
0
4
0
3
,
1
9
3
4
1
3
,
2
3
1
5
2
5
,
6
4
5
2,592,525
Al
l
O
t
h
e
r
L
o
c
a
l
S
a
l
e
s
T
a
x
*
23
9
,
7
3
9
2
2
9
,
7
6
6
1
8
2
,
4
8
4
2
1
6
,
3
6
1
2
7
0
,
6
3
7
2
7
6
,
9
3
7
1,415,925
TO
T
A
L
1
,
1
3
2
,
3
4
6
$
1
,
1
1
8
,
2
2
8
$
1
,
0
7
1
,
6
5
2
$
1
,
1
4
0
,
9
8
4
$
1
,
1
5
0
,
2
4
2
$
1
,
2
5
2
,
2
3
4
$
6,865,685 $
*
N
o
t
e
:
D
o
e
s
n
o
t
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
c
a
b
l
e
f
r
a
n
c
h
i
s
e
f
e
e
s
o
r
s
a
l
e
s
t
a
x
a
u
d
i
t
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
F:
\
B
U
D
G
E
T
A
N
A
L
Y
S
T
\
F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
R
e
p
o
r
t
s
2
0
1
5
-
2
0
1
6
\
2
Q
\
D
e
c
\
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
H
-
G
e
n
F
u
n
d
L
o
c
a
l
S
a
l
e
s
T
a
x
02/22/2016
Town Council Regular Session Item # 4.
Meeting Date:03/02/2016
Requested by: Aimee Ramsey
Submitted By:Aimee Ramsey, Development Infrastructure Services
Department:Development Infrastructure Services
Information
SUBJECT:
RESOLUTION NO. (R)16-11, PROVIDING NOTICE OF INTENT TO DECREASE THE
EQUIVALENT RESIDENTIAL UNIT (ERU) AS DEFINED IN THE STORMWATER
SECTION OF THE TOWN CODE THEREBY INDIRECTLY INCREASING THE RATES
FOR COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES FOR THE ORO VALLEY STORMWATER UTILITY
RECOMMENDATION:
The Stormwater Utility Commission and staff recommend approval, providing Notice of
Intent to decrease the Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU) therefore increasing the
Stormwater rates for the Oro Valley Stormwater Utility.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Pursuant to A.R.S. § 9-511.01, a municipality must adopt a Notice of Intent to increase
rates at least 30 days prior to the public hearing. The Notice of Intent does not increase
any of the rates. The consideration of adoption of any rate increases will occur at the
public hearing.
The attached resolution (Attachment #1) meets the intent of the statute by:
Making a copy of the Stormwater Rates Analysis Report available for public review
by placing the report in the Town Clerk's office and on the Stormwater Utility's
webpage (Attachment #3)
1.
Directing the town clerk to advertise the resolution in a newspaper of general
circulation at least 20 days prior to the public hearing
2.
Establishing a public hearing date for May 4, 20163.
This resolution sets in motion the public process by scheduling the public hearing and
publishing the report. The Stormwater Utility Rate Analysis Report may be obtained at
the Town Clerk's Office or on the Stormwater Utility webpage. Once the Notice of Intent
is approved and the report is published, the amount of the proposed water rate increase
that could be adopted at the public hearing cannot exceed the amounts published in the
report.
The proposed decrease of Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU) from 5,000 to 4,000
requires a change in Town Code Chapter 15 (Attachment #2).
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
The Town Code 15-24-13 Section H clearly states the following as guidelines for the
Base Rate for the Stormwater Utility;
The Town Council shall, by resolution, establish the annual (fiscal year) monthly
base rate for the Stormwater Utility fee. The base rate shall be calculated to ensure
adequate revenues to fund the costs of stormwater management and to provide for
the operation, maintenance, and capital improvements of the stormwater system in
the Town.
1.
The Stormwater Utility Commission shall annually review the Stormwater Utility
revenue requirements and recommend to the Town Council rate adjustments as
necessary.
2.
Based on work accomplished over the past year and half by the Stormwater Utility
Commission, and upon review of the current rate, it has been determined that the
current rate will be insufficient to cover the costs of stormwater management and to
provide for the operation, maintenance, and capital improvements of the stormwater
system in the Town to meet minimum State storm water management criteria. The
Stormwater Utility has produced a Stormwater Rate Increase Analysis due to the fact
that the projected FY 2017 budget depicts an ending cash balance of the fund less than
the 15% required by code.
Pursuant to A.R.S. § 9-499.15 Section B.2: If the municipality proposes to increase the
rate of an existing tax or fee on a business, it is required to provide written notice of the
proposed increase on the home page of the municipality's website at least sixty days
prior to the date the proposed new rate is approved or disapproved by the governing
body of the municipality.
The Stormwater Utility staff reviewed rates to determine the base rate required to meet
cost of the Stormwater management program. A resolution providing for a Notice of
Intent to decrease Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU) from 5,000 to 4,000 is attached.
This resolution meets statutory requirements and sets in motion the public process by
scheduling the public hearing on April 6, 2016, publishing the Notice of Intent and
making the Stormwater Rates Analysis Report available for public review.
The Notice of Intent does not authorize any rate increases. If the resolution for the
Notice of Intent is approved, a separate resolution decreasing the ERU will be presented
to the Town Council for consideration at the public hearing on May 4, 2016. The
Stormwater Rates Analysis Report will be available at the Town Clerk's Office or on the
Stormwater Utility webpage. Once the Notice of Intent is approved and the report is
published, the change in ERU that could be adopted at the public hearing cannot vary
from the published reduction in the report.
The Stormwater Utility Commission evaluated staff recommendations based on a water
rates analysis to assure the recommendations meet Town policies. On January 21,
2016, the Commission voted to recommend approval of the Preferred Financial Scenario
in the Stormwater Rates Analysis Report.
The Stormwater Rates Analysis Report includes projections for five years; however,
Stormwater rates will be reviewed annually and only for the first year in the five year
projection period. The Preferred Financial Scenario meets all revenue requirements and
cash reserve requirements for the Stormwater Utility.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact associated with adopting a Notice of Intent to increase water
rates. However, if the resolution is approved, the proposed Stormwater Utility rates
decrease in ERU will be presented to the Town Council for their consideration at the
public hearing on May 4, 2016. The financial impacts of the proposed Stormwater ERU
decrease to the Utility are detailed in Appendix B of the Stormwater Utility Rate Analysis
Report.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to (approve or deny) Resolution No. (R)16-11, providing Notice of Intent to
decrease Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU) for the Oro Valley Stormwater Utility
modifying Town Code 15-24-13 Section H.
Attachments
(R)16-11 Providing Notice of Intent to Decrease ERU
Town Code Changes
Stormwater Utility Rate Analysis
RESOLUTION NO. (R)16-11
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, PROVIDING NOTICE OF INTENT TO
DECREASE THE EQUIVALENT RESIDENTIAL UNIT (ERU) AS
DEFINED IN THE STORMWATER SECTION OF THE TOWN CODE
THEREBY INDIRECTLY INCREASING THE STORMWATER RATES
FOR THE ORO VALLEY STORMWATER UTILITY
WHEREAS, pursuant to A.R.S. § 9-511,et seq., the Town finds it necessary to consider
decreasing the Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU) as defined in Chapter 15 of the Oro Valley
Town Code, thereby indirectly increasing the Stormwater Utility base rate for the Oro Valley
Stormwater Utility; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to A.R.S. § 9-511, et seq.,the Town is required to give a Notice of Intent
at a regular Town Council meeting to decrease Stormwater rates, fees and charges; and
WHEREAS, the Town has completed a Stormwater Rates Analysis Report, attached hereto as
Exhibit “A”, which supports decreasing the Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU); and
WHEREAS,not less than twenty (20) days prior to the public hearing on the proposed rate
decrease, the Town shall cause to be published one time in a newspaper of general circulation
within the Town’s boundaries, a Notice of Intent showing the date, time and place of the hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro
Valley, Arizona, that:
1.This Resolution serves as the Notice of Intent, which is hereby publicly given, for
the Town of Oro Valley to decrease the Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU).
2.A public hearing shall be held at the regular meeting of the Mayor and Council at
6:00 p.m. on May 4, 2016, in the Council Chambers of the Town Hall, Town of
Oro Valley, 11000 North La Cañada Drive, Oro Valley, Arizona, to deliberate and
vote on the proposed increases.
3.Exhibit “A”, attached hereto, be made available to the public in the Office of the
Town Clerk and on the Town of Oro Valley Stormwater Utility website for
review prior to the public hearing.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley,
Arizona, this 2
nd day of March, 2016.
2
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
Dr. Satish I. Hiremath, Mayor
ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie K. Bower, Town Clerk Tobin Sidles, Legal Services Director
Date:Date:
EXHIBIT “A”
Article 15-24
STORMWATER
Sections:
15-24-1 Authority
15-24-2 Need and Purpose
15-24-3 Area of Jurisdiction
15-24-4 “Town-Owned Stormwater Utility (“Enterprise”)”
15-24-5 (Reserved)
15-24-6 Stormwater Utility Commission
15-24-7 Director of Administration
15-24-8 Adoption of Stormwater Management Plan
15-24-9 Facilities
15-24-10 Reserve Funds
15-24-11 Disclaimer
15-24-12 Rules of Interpretation
15-24-13 Stormwater Utility Fee System
15-24-14 Stormwater Management and Discharge Control
15-24-1 Authority
This article may be referred to as the Town of Oro Valley Stormwater Utility Ordinance. This article is adopted
pursuant to ARS 9-521, which defines stormwater as a utility undertaking, and ARS 9-522, which authorizes
the Town to issue bonds and prescribe service charges so that a utility undertaking for which bonds are issued
will always remain self-supporting with revenue sufficient to repay bonds and provide for the expenses of
operation, maintenance, expansion and replacement of facilities.
(01-15, Added, 06/20/2001)
15-24-2 Need and Purpose
A. The occurrence of storms and other events that may cause periodic flooding of land. Such periodic
flooding, in sound engineering practice, requires the planning, design, construction, operation, and
maintenance of facilities that safely drain and control the quantity and quality of runoff from such storms and
other events.
B. The purpose of this article is to provide for the creation of the Town of Oro Valley Stormwater Utility and to
adopt appropriate funding mechanisms and service charges to provide the needed stormwater facilities.
(01-15, Added, 06/20/2001)
15-24-3 Area of Jurisdiction
The Stormwater Utility applies to all areas within the incorporated limits of the Town.
(01-15, Added, 06/20/2001)
15-24-4 “Town-Owned Stormwater Utility (“Enterprise”)”
A. The Stormwater Utility shall constitute an enterprise of the Town. The Town, may issue its own revenue
bonds or other obligations (including refunding securities) on behalf of the Town. The revenue bonds or other
obligations shall be payable solely from the net revenues derived from the operation of the Stormwater Utility.
Such revenue bonds or other obligations may be additionally secured by mortgages on or security interest in
any real or personal property of the Town used in the operation of the Stormwater Utility. The ordinance issuing
any such revenue bonds or other obligations shall be adopted in the same manner and shall be subject to
referendum to the same extent as any ordinance of the Town in accordance with Arizona law.
B. Any pledge of net revenues derived from the operation of the Stormwater Utility shall be subject to
limitations on future pledges thereof contained in any ordinance authorizing the issuance of outstanding bonds
or other obligations of the Town payable from the same source or sources. All bonds or other obligations
issued by ordinance payable from the net revenues derived from the operation of the Stormwater Utility and all
revenue bonds or other obligations of the Stormwater Utility payable solely from the net revenues derived from
the operation of the Stormwater Utility, shall be treated as having the same obligor and as being payable in
whole or in part from the same source or sources.
C. The Stormwater Utility shall also be authorized to have and exercise the following powers in furtherance of
its purpose: 1) to hold meetings concurrently with regular and special meetings of the Town Council; 2) to have
and use a seal; 3) to issue its revenue bonds for stormwater purposes in the manner in which Town revenue
bonds may be issued; 4) to pledge any revenues of the Town’s stormwater system to the payment of such
revenue bonds and to pay such revenue bonds therefrom; 5) to enter into contracts relating to the stormwater
system in the manner in which Town contracts may be entered into; 6) to make representations, warranties,
and covenants relating to the stormwater system on behalf of the Town; 7) to exercise rights and privileges of
the Town relating to the stormwater system; and 8) to bind the Town to perform any obligation relating to the
stormwater system other than the multiple-fiscal year direct or indirect debt or other financial obligation(s) of the
Town without adequate present cash reserves pledged irrevocably and held for payments in all future years.
D. All revenues and expenditures of the Town, or of the Stormwater Utility relating to the stormwater system,
shall be considered revenues and expenditures of the Stormwater Utility.
(01-15, Added, 06/20/2001)
15-24-5 (Reserved)
(Reserved).
(01-15, Added, 06/20/2001)
15-24-6 Stormwater Utility Commission
There is hereby established an entity to be called the Town of Oro Valley Stormwater Utility Commission. The
Commission shall be comprised of five (5) Oro Valley residents, and the Mayor and Council shall appoint the
members.
(01-15, Added, 06/20/2001)
15-24-7 Director of Administration
The Public Works Director, or designee, shall serve as the Administrator of the Stormwater Utility.
(01-15, Added, 06/20/2001)
15-24-8 Adoption of Stormwater Management Plan
The Stormwater Utility shall adopt a comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan in conformance with the
Environmental Protection Agency’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Phase II
guidelines (40 C.F.R. 9.122-125). The Stormwater Management Plan shall outline the goals and objectives of
the stormwater system and identify the various elements of the system necessary to achieve the goals and the
associated costs in accordance with generally accepted hydrology practices.
(01-15, Added, 06/20/2001)
15-24-9 Facilities
All stormwater conveyance facilities owned by or dedicated to the Town within the area of jurisdiction shall be
considered the facilities of the Stormwater Utility. Stormwater conveyance facilities constructed as a part of
private development shall not be dedicated to the public unless a request is made of the Town to accept
dedication of such facilities and the Administrator determines that the facilities are constructed to current Town
standards and that it is in the public interest to accept such dedication. Such facilities and/or interests in real
property shall not be conveyed to the Town prior to the issuance of a formal acceptance by the Town.
(01-15, Added, 06/20/2001)
15-24-10 Reserve Funds
The Stormwater Utility shall maintain reserve funds for unexpected and/or emergency needs. The need for use
of said funds shall be determined by the Board with recommendations from the Commission, or in the case of
an emergency where the Commission can not be convened in a timely manner, with recommendation from the
Director. This reserve shall be fifteen percent (15%) of the collected annual stormwater fees.
(01-15, Added, 06/20/2001)
15-24-11 Disclaimer
Floods from stormwater runoff may occasionally exceed the capacity of stormwater facilities constructed and
maintained pursuant to this article. This article does not denote that property liable for the fees and charges
established by this article would always be free from stormwater flooding or flood damage. This article does not
purport to reduce the need or the necessity for the property owners to obtain flood insurance. This article does
not create any liability on the part of the Town or any officer or employee thereof for any damages that may
result from reliance on this article or actions of the Stormwater Utility. This article, other than as provided for in
this section, does not relieve any person from liability for actions taken, or not taken, for damage to persons or
the property of others.
(01-15, Added, 06/20/2001)
15-24-12 Rules of Interpretation
Nothing in this article shall be construed to limit or repeal other powers granted to the Town. Should provisions
of this article conflict or overlap with other regulations, ordinances, or statutes, the regulation, ordinance, or
statute that imposes the more stringent requirement or restriction shall prevail.
(01-15, Added, 06/20/2001)
15-24-13 Stormwater Utility Fee System
A. Findings.
1. The Town maintains a system of storm and surface water management facilities including, but
not limited to, inlets, conduits, manholes, channels, ditches, drainage easements, retention and
detention basins, infiltration facilities, and other components as well as natural waterways.
2. The stormwater system in the Town needs regular maintenance, repair and improvements.
3. Stormwater quality is degraded due to erosion and the discharge of nutrients, metals, organic
compounds including oil and grease, and other substances into and through the stormwater
system.
4. Stormwater quantity is affected by erosion, design of drainage, maintenance of stormwater
channels, channel vegetation, floodway and flood plain characteristics and changes, and
deposition of material in the channels.
5. The public’s health, safety, and welfare are adversely affected by poor stormwater quality and
flooding that result from inadequate management of both the quality and quantity of stormwater.
6. All real property in the Town either uses or benefits from the maintenance of the stormwater
system.
7. The extent of use of the stormwater system by each property is dependant on factors that
influence runoff, including land use and the amount of impervious surface on the property.
8. The costs of improving, maintaining, repairing, operating, and monitoring the stormwater
system shall be allocated, to the extent practicable, to all property owners based on the impact of
runoff from the impervious areas of their property on the stormwater control and conveyance
system.
9. Management of the stormwater system to protect the public health, safety, and welfare as well
as meet the Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Phase II permit and FEMA
requirements requires adequate revenues. It is in the interest of the public to finance stormwater
management with a fee system that is reasonable and equitable. Single-family residences will be
charged a flat rate for one (1) ERU. Non-single-family and religious/educational property owners
will be charged a multiple rate equal to the amount of impervious area on their property divided by
the amount of one (1) ERU (four thousand (4,000) square feet)(five thousand (5,000) square feet).
This formula will charge property owners on the basis of their properties’ impact to the stormwater
system.
B. Authority. Authority for the adoption of a system of charges to fund the implementation of stormwater
management programs is conferred on the Town by ARS 9-530, as amended.
C. Definitions. For the purposes of this chapter, the following words and phrases shall have the meanings
indicated:
1. “Administrator of the Stormwater Utility” or “Administrator” means the Town Engineer, or
designee, shall serve as the Administrator of the Stormwater Utility.
2. “Arizona Pollutant Elimination Discharge System (AZPDES)” means a program required under
Section 402(b) of the Clean Water Act (CWA), in accordance with 40 CFR 123.22. The program
specifies how the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (Department) will administer the
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. The program is found in
Article (3.1) of the Arizona Revised Statutes in Chapter 2, under Title 49 authorizing a state
NPDES program. The administrative rules for an Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(AZPDES) program are consistent with, but no more stringent than, the NPDES program and the
requirements of Sections 402(b) (state permit programs) and 402(p) (municipal and industrial
stormwater discharges) of the CWA.
3. “Equivalent residential unit (ERU)” means approximate average amount of impervious area
associated with single-family residential property in the Town.
4. “Base rate (BR)” means the Stormwater Utility flat fee to an ERU of five thousand (5,000) four
thousand (4,000) square feet of impervious surface.
5. “Commission” means the Stormwater Utility Commission for the Town of Oro Valley
established under this article.
6. “Developed property” means real property which has been altered from its structures, or other
impervious area.
7. “Undeveloped property” means real property in its untouched natural state.
8. “Fee” or “Stormwater Utility fee” means the charge established under this section and levied
on owners of parcels or pieces of real property to fund the costs of stormwater management,
implementation of the Stormwater Management Plan together with constructing, operating,
maintaining, repairing, and improving the stormwater system in the Town.
9. “FEMA” means the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
10. “Fiscal year” means July 1st of a calendar year to June 30th of the next calendar year, both
inclusive.
11. “Impervious surface area” means the number of square feet of horizontal surface covered by
buildings and other impervious surface, which is compacted or covered with material that is
resistant to infiltration by water, including, but not limited to, most conventionally surfaced streets,
roofs, sidewalks, patios, driveways, parking lots, and any other oiled, graveled, graded,
compacted, or other surface that impedes the natural infiltration of surface water.
12. “Multifamily dwelling” means a building with more than three (3) dwelling units (to include
apartments and condominiums).
13. “Nonresidential property” means developed property other than single-family residential
property. Such property shall include, but not be limited to, multifamily dwellings, commercial
properties, industrial properties, parking lots, hospitals, recreational and cultural facilities, hotels,
and offices.
14. “Educational facilities, religious institutions and nonprofits” means any developed public,
private, or parochial school or any building recognized as a religious facility or nonprofit use.
15. “Property owner” means the property owner of record as listed in the Pima County
Assessor’s roll. A property owner includes any individual, corporation, firm, partnership, or group of
individuals acting as a unit, and any trustee, receiver, or personal representative.
16. “Single-family residential property (SFR)” means a developed property that serves the
primary purpose of providing a permanent dwelling unit. Single-family residential property shall
also include duplexes and triplexes. A single-family detached dwelling containing an accessory
apartment or second dwelling unit is included in this definition.
17. “Stormwater utility fund” or “fund” means the fund created by this chapter to operate,
maintain, repair, and improve the Town’s stormwater system and implement the Town’s
Stormwater Management Plan.
18. “Stormwater Management Plan” means the planning, design, construction, regulation,
improvement, repair, maintenance, operation of facilities and programs necessary for the Town to
meet the compliance requirements of the Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(AZPDES) Phase II Municipal General Permit and FEMA Regulations as relating to water, flood
plains, flood control, grading erosion, and sediment control along those activities.
19. “Stormwater system” means the system or network of storm and surface water facilities
including but not limited to inlets, conduits, manholes, channels, ditches, drainage easements,
retention and detention basins, infiltration facilities and other components as well as all natural
waterways (including washes). It shall also mean the activities associated with implementing the
Stormwater Management Plan.
20. “Water” means any stormwater, surface water, snow melt or ground water.
D. Establishment of Stormwater Utility Fund.
1. The Stormwater Management Plan is established to provide for the Town’s compliance with
the AZPDES Phase II Municipal General Permit requirements and to provide the stormwater
system necessary to convey stormwater, control flooding, and to protect the natural environment.
The costs of complying with the AZPDES Phase II program and FEMA Regulations along with
designing, developing, improving, operating, maintaining, and monitoring the stormwater system
required in the Town should, therefore, be allocated, to the extent practicable, to all property
owners based on their impact on the stormwater system. In order to provide revenue to fund those
costs and to fairly allocate those costs, a Stormwater Utility Fund (the “fund”) is established.
2. All revenues collected from the Stormwater Utility fee, from grants, permit fees, penalties and
other charges collected under this article, shall be deposited to the fund. The Town Council may
make additional appropriations to the fund. All disbursements from the fund shall be for the
purposes of the fund as set forth in subsection E of this section, and the fund shall be used for
those purposes only.
E. Purposes of the Fund. The fund shall be used for the following purposes:
1. All costs of implementation and administration of the Stormwater Management Plan, including
the establishment of reasonable operating and capital reserves to meet unanticipated or
emergency stormwater management requirements. There shall be a reserve fund of fifteen percent
(15%) of the collected annual stormwater fees as specified under Section 15-24-10 of this code.
2. Inspection and enforcement activities.
3. Billing and administrative costs.
4. Other activities that are reasonably required to accomplish the mission of the Stormwater
Management Plan.
F. Stormwater Utility Fee. A monthly service charge is imposed upon all real property in the Town, as of the
first day of each month, beginning January 1, 2008, to fund the Stormwater Management Plan and stormwater
system with invoicing as defined in subsection J of this section. This service charge shall be known as the
Stormwater Utility fee (“fee”). As any real property is developed or developed real property is annexed into the
Town it will be subject to the fee. The fee is based on the cost of implementing a stormwater management
program.
G. Classification of Property for Purposes of Determination of the Stormwater Utility Fee.
1. For purposes of determining the Stormwater Utility fee, all properties in the Town are classified
into one of the following classes:
a. Single-family residential property; or
b. Nonresidential property; or
c. Educational facilities, religious institutions and nonprofits.
2. Single-Family Residential (SFR) Fee. All developed single-family residential properties in the
Town shall be charged a flat Stormwater Utility fee, equal to the base rate, regardless of the size of
the parcel or the improvements.
3. Non-Single-Family Residential Property (NSFR) Monthly Fee. A developed non-single-family
residential (NSFR) property will be charged a fee for the number of ERUs of impervious area. The
impervious area for developed NSFR property may be determined through site examination,
mapping information, aerial photographs and other available information. NSFR without first flush
capabilities or other approved stormwater pollution prevention devices shall pay the base rate
times the number of ERUs on the site. The monthly fee shall be determined by dividing the total
impervious surface (in square feet) by five thousand (5,000) four thousand (4,000) and rounding
that value up or down to the nearest whole ERU amount and then multiplying the result by the
base rate to obtain the monthly fee. NSFR properties that incorporate first flush capabilities or
other approved stormwater pollution prevention devices are eligible for a twenty-five percent (25%)
reduction in the fee, providing they apply to and are approved by the Stormwater Utility
Commission and meet the annual inspection and maintenance requirements.
4. Educational Facilities, Religious Institutions and Nonprofits Monthly Fee. A developed religious
institution, school or other non-profit property shall be eligible for a twenty-five percent (25%) fee
reduction provided they apply to and are approved by the Stormwater Utility Commission. In order
to qualify for the fee reduction, the educational facility, religious institution or non-profit organization
must conduct educational programs or other tasks on the topic of stormwater management as
approved by the Stormwater Utility Commission. No developed educational facility, religious
institution or nonprofit property shall pay less than seventy-five percent (75%) of the base rate. The
monthly fee shall be determined by dividing the total impervious surface (in square feet) by five
thousand (5,000)four thousand (4,000) and rounding that value up or down to the nearest whole
ERU amount and then multiplying the result by the base rate to obtain the monthly fee.
H. Base Rate.
1. The Town Council shall, by resolution, establish the annual (fiscal year) monthly base rate for
the Stormwater Utility fee. The base rate shall be calculated to ensure adequate revenues to fund
the costs of stormwater management and to provide for the operation, maintenance, and capital
improvements of the stormwater system in the Town.
2. A schedule of fees shall be maintained by the Stormwater Utility, three (3) copies of which
shall be available at the Town Clerk’s office.
3. The Stormwater Utility Commission shall annually review the Stormwater Utility revenue
requirements and recommend to the Town Council rate adjustments as necessary.
I. Exemptions.
1. Property which is owned by the Town and other governmental agencies shall be exempt from
the fee.
2. Undeveloped property shall be exempt from the fee.
J. Billing.
1. Each property served by the Oro Valley Water Utility shall be billed monthly for the Stormwater
Utility fee. Properties not served by the Oro Valley Water Utility shall be billed quarterly. The bill
may be part of the Oro Valley Water Utility bill, a separate billing, or some other reasonable
mechanism.
2. Service charges shall begin January 1, 2008, with invoicing at the end of the month or quarter,
as appropriate.
K. Delinquent Stormwater Utility Fee Process/Penalties. For Oro Valley residents being served water by
the Oro Valley Water Utility and charged their stormwater utility fees as part of their Water Utility bill, the Oro
Valley Water Utility regulations shall apply to all delinquent fees.
For all other Oro Valley Stormwater Utility customers, the following shall be followed to obtain payment of
delinquent fees and penalties:
1. Process. Stormwater Utility fees are overdue twenty-one (21) days after the Stormwater Utility
bill is issued and a penalty for any overdue payments may be imposed.
a. The Stormwater Utility Manager shall send a delinquency notice to property owners
responsible for Stormwater Utility fees demanding payment of their delinquent fee within ten
(10) days of the date of the notice.
b. If there is no reply to the Stormwater Utility Manager’s letter, the Town Attorney’s office
shall send a letter demanding payment of the Stormwater Utility fee from property owners who
have not replied to the first notice. In the event that there is no response to the Town Attorney’s
letter, the Town will initiate legal proceedings in the Oro Valley Magistrate Court after ten (10)
days.
c. Failure to pay the fee, including any late charges, by the due date shall be considered a
civil violation and a summons and complaint will be served on the property owner. The
summons and complaint will be served on the property owner by a process server.
d. In the event the defendant(s) fail(s) to appear in court, the Oro Valley Magistrate is
authorized to issue a default judgment against the defendant(s) in accordance with subsection
(K)(2) of this section.
2. Penalties.
a. Civil Sanctions. A person found responsible for a violation of this article shall be
sanctioned by the Magistrate or Hearing Officer as follows:
i. First violation within a twenty-four (24) month period: a sanction of not more than one
hundred dollars ($100.00).
ii. Second violation within a twenty-four (24) month period: a sanction of not more than
one hundred fifty dollars ($150.00).
iii. Third or subsequent violation within a twenty-four (24) month period: a sanction of not
more than two hundred dollars ($200.00).
iv. The court may, at its discretion, reduce or suspend the sanction.
Sanctions are in addition to the delinquent Storm Water Utility fee, late fees and charges.
b. Default Judgment.
i. If, after being legally served with a summons and complaint, the party fails to appear at
the hearing time designated in the summons and complaint and/or time designated for a
hearing by the Court, that individual shall be deemed to have admitted the allegation in the
complaint and the Court shall enter judgment and impose a civil sanction in accordance
with the provisions of this chapter.
ii. Upon entry of the default judgment, the Court, in addition to the sanctions, may impose
all applicable surcharges, security fees, a default judgment fee and other court fees as
authorized by State law or Town ordinance.
iii. If any penalty ordered to be paid by the Magistrate or forfeited pursuant to default is
not paid within thirty (30) days of the Magistrate’s order, a lien on the real property to which
the delinquent stormwater fees apply may be filed in the amount of the judgment by the
Town Attorney. The Magistrate may also institute judicial proceedings as provided by law to
collect any such penalty. All penalties collected pursuant to this article shall be paid to and
become the property of the Town.
L. Requests for Correction of the Stormwater Utility Fee.
1. A property owner may request correction of the fee by submitting the request in writing to the
Stormwater Utility Administrator. Grounds for correction of the fee include:
a. Incorrect classification of the property for purposes of determining the fee;
b. Errors in the square footage of the impervious surface area of the property;
c. Mathematical errors in calculating the fee to be applied to the property; and
d. Errors in the identification of the property owner of a property subject to the fee.
2. The Stormwater Utility Administrator shall make a determination within thirty (30) days after
the receipt of (as indicated by the receipt date stamp) the property owner’s completed written
request for correction of the fee. The applicant may appeal the Administrator’s determination to the
Stormwater Utility Commission.
3. A property owner must comply with all rules and procedures adopted by the Town when
submitting a request for correction of the fee and must provide all information necessary for the
Stormwater Utility Administrator to make a determination on a request for correction of the fee. If a
property owner alleges an error under subsection (L)(1)(b) of this section, the request for correction
must include a certification by a registered civil engineer or professional land surveyor of the
impervious surface area of the property. Failure to comply with the provisions of this subsection
shall be grounds for denial of the request.
((O)10-14, Amended, 11/17/2010; (O)10-04, Amended, 04/07/2010; (O)07-40, Added, 11/07/2007)
15-24-14 Stormwater Management and Discharge Control
A. Title. This section shall be known as the “Storm Water Quality Management and Discharge Control
Ordinance” of the Town of Oro Valley and may be so cited.
B. Purpose and Intent. The purpose and intent of this section is to ensure the health, safety, and general
welfare of citizens, and protect and enhance the water quality of watercourses and water bodies in a manner
pursuant to and consistent with the Federal Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System Regulations (40 CFR Part 122), and State regulations for stormwater discharge
(ARS Title 49, Chapter 2, Article 3.1) by establishing minimum stormwater management requirements for the
management of pollutants that are or may be discharged to the municipal storm sewer system.
C. Definitions. The terms used in this section shall have the following meanings:
1. ADEQ means the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, Arizona’s regulatory entity
responsible for administering Federal and State environmental laws and programs including most
water-quality, air-quality, and waste programs.
2. Authorized Representative means the Town Engineer, or his/her designee, who has the
delegated duties and powers pursuant to this section.
3. AZPDES means the Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System.
4. AZPDES Permit means any permit issued by the ADEQ pursuant to 33 U.S.C. 1342(b) that
authorizes the discharge of pollutants to waters of the United States, whether the permit is
applicable to an individual, a group, or on a general area-wide basis.
5. Best Management Practices (BMPs) means activities, practices, and procedures to prevent or
reduce the discharge of pollutants directly or indirectly to the municipal storm drain and ephemeral
wash systems and waters of the United States. BMPs include but are not limited to: treatment
facilities, including first-flush technology, to remove pollutants from stormwater; public education
and involvement; operating and maintenance procedures; facility management practices to control
runoff, spillage or leaks of nonstormwater, waste disposal, and drainage from materials storage;
erosion and sediment control practices; and the prohibition of specific activities, practices, and
procedures and such other provisions as the Town determines appropriate for the control of
pollutants.
6. Certified Industrial Hygienist means a professional industrial hygienist who is certified by the
American Board of Industrial Hygiene.
7. Clean Water Act means the Federal Water Pollution Control Act amendments of 1972 (P.L.
92-500; 86 Stat. 816; 33 U.S.C. 1251 through 1376), as amended.
8. Construction Activity means activities subject to the ADEQ construction general permit
(AZG2008-001) and the Town of Oro Valley’s grading permit requirements.
9. Connection means the location/juncture at which discharge can enter a municipal separate
storm sewer or ephemeral wash system.
10. Corrective Action Plan means a plan that is required under this section and approved by an
authorized representative that consists of structural and/or nonstructural BMPs to minimize to the
maximum extent practicable stormwater pollution or to remediate anthropogenic impacts to the
storm-drain/wash system.
11. De Minimus Discharge means a discharge that is a low flow volume and/or low frequency,
seldom occurring, event of relatively pollutant-free water which is discharged with appropriate
BMPs to reduce any pollutant concentrations to below the applicable surface standard (A.A.C. Title
18, Chapter 11, Article 1).
12. Discharge means any addition of any pollutant to waters of the United States or to an MS4
from any point source.
13. Discharger means any person who causes or allows a discharge or who owns property from
which a discharge originates.
14. Engineer means a professional civil engineer who is registered with the State of Arizona.
15. Environment means navigable waters, any other surface waters, ground water, drinking
water supply, land surface, subsurface strata, ambient air, biotic community, or wildlife habitat
within or bordering on the Town.
16. EPA means the United States Environmental Protection Agency charged with primary
enforcement of the Clean Water Act.
17. First-Flush means a collection system approved by the Town that is employed to capture and
isolate the first one-half (1/2) inch runoff from the commercial development site.
18. Illicit/Illegal Discharge means any direct or indirect nonstormwater discharge to the Town’s
storm drain or wash systems, or placement of anthropogenic materials in the preceding systems,
except as exempted in subsection (H)(1) of this section or discharges pursuant to and in
compliance with an applicable NPDES or AZPDES permit or other written authorization from the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality
(ADEQ).
19. Industrial Facility means the site of any industrial activity regulated under NPDES or AZPDES
industrial stormwater permits as defined in 40 CFR Section 122.26(b)(14).
20. Land Disturbance Activity means any activity that is regulated under NPDES or AZPDES
stormwater permit requirements for construction sites.
21. Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) means all separate storm sewers defined as
“large,” “medium,” or “small” municipal separate storm sewer systems or any municipal separate
storm sewers on a system-wide or jurisdiction-wide basis as determined by the Director under
A.A.C. R28-9-C902(A)(1)(g)(i) through (iv). [A.A.C. R18-9-A901(23)]. This also includes similar
systems owned or operated by separate storm sewer municipal jurisdictions not required to obtain
stormwater discharge authorization.
22. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Stormwater Discharge Permits
means general, group, and individual stormwater discharge permits which regulate facilities
defined in Federal NPDES regulations pursuant to the Clean Water Act.
23. Notice of Intent (NOI) means a document which describes the intent to operate in accordance
with an NPDES/AZPDES Construction General Permit.
24. Notice of Termination (NOT) means the document to terminate coverage under the
NPDES/AZPDES Construction General Permit.
25. Nonstormwater Discharge means any discharge to the storm drain and wash system that
does not originate from precipitation.
26. Owner or operator means any owner or operator of any “facility or activity” subject to
regulation under the NPDES/AZPDES program.
27. Person means an individual, property owner, firm, partnership, joint venture, association,
corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, broker, the Federal Government, the State of
Arizona, or any political subdivision or agency of this State.
28. Point Source means any discernible, confined, and discrete conveyance including, but not
limited to, any pipe, ditch, channel, tunnel, conduit, well, discrete fissure, container, rolling stock,
concentrated animal feeding operation, vessel or other floating craft from which pollutants are or
may be discharged. This does not include return flows from irrigated agriculture or agricultural
stormwater runoff.
29. Pollutant means sediment, fluids, contaminants, toxic wastes, toxic pollutants, dredged spoil,
solid waste, substances and chemicals, pesticides, herbicides, fertilizers and other agricultural
chemicals, incinerator residue, sewage, garbage, sewage sludge, munitions, petroleum products,
chemical wastes, biological materials, radioactive materials, heat, wrecked or discarded
equipment, rock, sand, cellar dirt (e.g., overburden material), and mining, industrial, municipal and
agricultural wastes or any other liquid, solid, gaseous or hazardous substances. [A.R.S. Section
49-201(29)]
30. Pollution means the human-made or human-induced alteration of the quality of waters by
waste to a degree which unreasonably affects, or has the potential to unreasonably affect, either
the waters for beneficial uses or the facilities which serve these beneficial uses.
31. Premises means any building, lot, parcel of land, or portion of land whether improved or
unimproved including adjacent sidewalks and parking strips.
32. Stormwater means stormwater runoff, snow melt runoff, and surface runoff and drainage.
33. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) means a document required under
NPDES/AZPDES regulations or imposed pursuant to this section that describes the stormwater
quality controls in place at a site and how these controls will be inspected and maintained.
34. Town means the Town of Oro Valley.
35. Watercourse means any drainage channel, wash, road or path through which water can flow.
36. Waters of the United States (U.S.) is defined in 40 CFR 122.2.
D. Applicability. This section shall apply to all activities which may potentially affect the municipal separate
storm sewer system, any private storm sewer system, or any wash system on any land within the Town.
Additionally, this includes discharge from permanent or temporary stormwater management controls and
facilities, constructed as part of any activities listed in this section, which are located within the Town.
Stormwater management standards shall apply to industrial, commercial, institutional, and multi-family
residential development, as well as subdivision, roadway, and drainage projects that result in land area
disturbance equal to or greater than areas established by the current construction general permit.
E. Responsibility for Administration. The Town Engineer shall adopt, administer, implement, and enforce
such rules, regulations, standards, processes, and forms as he/she deems necessary for the efficient
administration and enforcement of the provisions of this section. Any powers granted or duties imposed upon
the Town Engineer/Public Works Director may be delegated to persons or entities acting in the beneficial
interest of or in the employ of the Town.
F. Regulatory Consistency. This section shall be construed to assure consistency with the requirements of
the Federal Clean Water Act and acts amendatory thereof or supplementary thereto, or any applicable
implementing regulations including those set forth in the Arizona State permit, and any amendments to,
revisions of, or re-issuance thereof. No permit or approval issued pursuant to this section shall relieve a person
of the responsibility to secure permits and approvals required for activities regulated by any other applicable
code, rule, act, or ordinance. Additionally, the Town does not certify or take any position whether the applicant
has met all requirements of the Federal Clean Water Act.
G. Ultimate Responsibility of Discharger. The requirements set forth herein and promulgated pursuant to
this section are intended to meet minimum standards as required by Federal and State regulations but can, as
determined by the Town Engineer, exceed the minimum standards. This section does not intend nor imply that
compliance by any person will ensure that there will be no contamination, pollution, nor unauthorized discharge
of pollutants into waters of the U.S. caused by said person. This section shall not create liability on the part of
the Town or any agent or employee thereof for any damages that may result from any discharger’s reliance on
this section or any administrative decision lawfully made thereunder.
H. Discharge Prohibitions and Controls to Reduce Pollutants Entering Drainage Systems.
1. General Requirements.
a. Any person engaged in activities which will or may result in pollutants entering a storm
sewer system shall undertake appropriate measures to reduce such pollutants. Examples of
such activities include, but are not limited to, proper use and disposal of household chemicals,
such as pesticides and fertilizers, cleaning solutions, and cleaning solution waste water; and
ownership and use of facilities which may be a source of pollutants including but not limited to
parking lots, gasoline stations, industrial facilities, construction sites, and retail establishments.
b. No person shall throw, deposit, leave, maintain, keep, or permit to be thrown, deposited,
placed, or left unmaintained any refuse, rubbish, garbage, vegetation trimmings, or other
discarded or abandoned objects, articles, and accumulations, in or upon any street, alley,
sidewalk, storm drain, inlet, catch basin, conduit or other drainage structures, parking area, or
upon any public or private plot of land so that the same might be or become a pollutant, except
where such pollutant is being temporarily stored in properly contained waste receptacles or is
part of a well-defined compost system.
2. Prohibition of Illegal Discharges.
a. No person shall discharge or cause to be discharged into the municipal separate storm
sewer system (MS4) or Town watercourses any materials, including but not limited to pollutants
or waters containing any pollutants that cause or contribute to a violation of applicable water
quality standards, other than stormwater or pumped or rising unpolluted ground water.
Additionally, depositing, dumping, or storing any material in a manner that may contribute
pollutants to or obstruct the flow of stormwater is prohibited. The following activities are also
subject to and enforceable under this section as they can contribute to contaminants which are
regulated by Federal and State regulations to which this section applies:
i. Failing to comply with any applicable AZPDES/NPDES permit including any permit
requirements to develop, implement, maintain or comply with a stormwater pollution
prevention plan (SWPPP);
ii. Failing to provide required information to the Town including:
(A) Copies of the SWPPP, notice of intent, notice of termination, or any other
documents relating to the permit;
(B) Upon request, copies of the SWPPP, water quality monitoring laboratory analytical
results, and/or final hydrologic reports/development plans certifying compliance with
any discharge detention or first-flush treatment requirements;
iii. Failing to develop, implement, or comply with a SWPPP or a corrective action plan
utilizing BMPs that is either required under an AZPDES/NPDES permit or imposed by the
Town pursuant to this section, including requirements to implement good housekeeping
practices, spill control and response procedures, employee training, record keeping, proper
material storage and waste management practices for control of nonstormwater flows, and
structural stormwater controls; and
iv. Misrepresentation in any document pertaining to an approved plan, permit, or
certification relating to a discharge activity.
b. The commencement, conduct, or continuance of any illegal discharge to the Town’s MS4
is prohibited except as follows:
i. Discharges from the following activities will not be considered a source of pollutants to
the Town’s MS4 including any waters of the U.S. when properly managed to ensure that
potential pollutants are minimized to the maximum extent practicable, and therefore they
shall not be considered illegal discharges unless determined to cause a violation of the
provisions of the Clean Water Act, ADEQ AZPDES General Permit No. AZG-2001-0001,
“General Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges to Waters of the U.S. Which Pose
a Limited or an Insignificant (De Minimus) Threat to Water Quality” (including amended or
reissued permits):
(A) Potable water line flushing;
(B) Uncontaminated pumped groundwater and other discharges from potable water
sources;
(C) Diverted stream flows;
(D) Air conditioning condensation;
(E) Uncontaminated non-industrial roof drains;
(F) Individual residential and occasional noncommercial car washing;
(G) Flows from riparian habitats;
(H) Dechlorinated swimming pool discharges with the exception of filter back wash
water;
(I) Street wash waters;
(J) Flows from fire fighting;
(K) Irrigation water;
(L) Foundation and footing drains;
(M) Water from sump pumps; and
(N) Dust control water.
ii. The prohibition shall not apply to any nonstormwater discharge permitted under an
NPDES/AZPDES permit, waiver, or waste discharge order issued to the discharger and
administered by the State of Arizona under the authority of the U.S. EPA; provided, that the
discharger is in full compliance with all requirements of the permit, waiver, or order and
other applicable laws and regulations; and provided, that written approval has been granted
by the Town for any discharge to the storm sewer system.
iii. With written concurrence of the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, the
Town may exempt in writing other nonstormwater discharges which are not a source of
pollutants to the storm sewer system or waters of the U.S. Such authorization from ADEQ
or the U.S. EPA shall be submitted to the Town prior to the time of discharge, and must be
retained for at least three (3) years after the last authorized discharge.
3. Discharges in Violation of Industrial or Construction Activity NPDES Storm Water Discharge
Permit. Any person subject to any type of NPDES or AZPDES water or stormwater discharge
permit shall comply with all provisions of such permit. Such compliance includes but is not limited
to implementing BMPs to minimize the chance of pollutant entry into the storm sewer system, to
reduce the potential for accidental discharge of pollutants to the municipal storm sewer system,
and to comply with the cleanup and notification requirements of this section as well as other
pertinent Federal/State regulations. Proof of compliance with said permit may be required in a form
acceptable to the Town Engineer/Public Works Director prior to or as a condition of a grading
permit, subdivision plat, development plan, building permit, or grading or improvement plan; upon
inspection of the facility; during any enforcement proceeding or action; or for any other reasonable
cause.
I. Requirement to Prevent, Control, and Reduce Stormwater Pollutants from Construction Sites.
1. Basic Requirements. All persons engaged in construction activities that are required by
Federal or State law to submit to the EPA and/or the ADEQ a notice of intent (NOI) to comply with
NPDES or AZPDES stormwater permit regulations shall provide the Town with a copy of the NOI,
the site-specific SWPPP, and the AZPDES stormwater permit issued by the ADEQ. Any person
performing construction who has submitted an NOI to the Town shall not cause or contribute to a
violation of the AZPDES stormwater permit issued to the Town.
2. Authorization to Adopt and Impose Best Management Practices. The Town Engineer/Public
Works Director has the final authority to require and accept BMPs as required for pre- and post-
construction activities and must be presented in a SWPPP that is included as a section in the plans
and permits submitted for Town review and acceptance as well as BMPs that are submitted as a
part of corrective action plans. Town acceptance of a SWPPP is required prior to issuance of a
grading permit.
3. Every owner, operator, or contractor undertaking any construction activity or operation of any
industrial facility having the potential to discharge pollutants to a water of the U.S. or the Town’s
MS4, or as otherwise required by the Town, the State of Arizona, or Federal agency, shall submit a
stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) to the Town. The SWPPP shall include BMP plans
including those required by the Town such as the installation of first-flush technology at commercial
sites and shall be prepared by a qualified person. Additionally, SWPPPs shall be prepared and
reviewed in accordance with the Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System construction
general permit issued by the ADEQ. The Town shall not certify or take any position on whether the
applicant has met the requirements of the Federal Clean Water Act.
4. New Development and Redevelopment. Owners of new development and redevelopment
projects shall implement BMPs to control the volume, rate, and potential pollutant load, including
sediment, of stormwater runoff from new development and redevelopment projects as may be
appropriate to minimize the generation, transport and discharge of pollutants including sediment in
accordance with the requirements of the AZPDES construction general permit. The Town shall
incorporate such requirements in the conditions of relevant development and/or plat approvals as
well as grading or other construction/building-related permit to be issued relative to such
development or redevelopment. Additionally, proof of all applicable Town, State, and Federal
permits such as the SWPPP, NOIs, inspection and maintenance logs, CWA 404s, etc., shall be
maintained on site for inspection by authorized representatives. To maintain compliance with
construction general permit requirements for inspections, construction site BMPs as delineated in
the SWPPP must be inspected by the site operator in accordance with the SWPPP.
5. Responsibility to Implement Best Management Practices. Any person engaged in activities or
operations, or owning facilities or property which will or may result in pollutants entering
stormwater, the Town’s MS4, or waters of the U.S. shall implement best management practices
including first-flush control technology on commercial development to the extent they are
technologically achievable to prevent and reduce such pollutants. The owner or operator of a
commercial or industrial establishment shall provide reasonable protection from accidental
discharge of prohibited materials or other wastes into the MS4 or watercourses. Facilities to
prevent accidental discharge of prohibited materials or other wastes shall be provided and
maintained at the owner’s or operator’s expense. Furthermore, notices to employees containing
information about whom to contact and what procedures to follow in the event of a spill or
accidental discharge must be posted at the site. Site owners or operators shall have a trained
employee or staff member who will be responsible for any necessary cleanup or remediation.
6. In the event of a spill or release in reportable quantities as defined in 40 CFR 302, 40 CFR 110
and 40 CFR 117, the owner, operator, or the person who has control of the source or location from
which a discharge which is not in compliance with this section shall immediately take all
reasonable safety precautions including, if appropriate, calling 911 and completing the following
steps:
a. Proceed with containment and cleanup in accordance with:
i. The orders of an involved health and safety agency, or if no such orders have been
issued;
ii. The orders of an authorized representative, or if no such orders have been issued;
iii. The stormwater pollution prevention plan or approved corrective action plan utilizing
best management practices for the involved facility;
b. Report any violations of the Town fire code or other such applicable safety or health codes
in the manner required by such code;
c. Notify the Oro Valley Town Engineer/Public Works Director and the Arizona Department of
Environmental Quality of the release by telephone before 5:00 p.m. of the next working day;
d. Provide written notification, within five (5) working days, to the Oro Valley Town
Engineer/Public Works Director of the type, volume, cause of the discharge, corrective actions
taken, and measures to be taken to prevent future occurrences.
7. Compliance with these requirements shall not relieve the discharger of any fines, penalties, or
liability incurred, or that may be imposed by this section or other applicable laws as a result of the
discharge. In addition, compliance with these requirements shall not relieve the discharger from the
reporting requirements of 40 CFR 110, 40 CFR 117 and 40 CFR 302.
J. Requirement to Eliminate Illegal Discharges. Notwithstanding the requirements of subsection (Q) of this
section, the Town Engineer/Public Works Director shall require by written notice that a person responsible for
an illegal discharge immediately, or by a specified date, discontinue the discharge and, if necessary, take
measures to eliminate the source of the discharge to prevent the occurrence of future illegal discharges.
Compliance with these requirements shall not relieve the owner/operator of property from which the illegal
discharge occurred of any fines, penalties, or liability associated with the action that may be imposed by this
section or other applicable laws.
K. Requirement to Eliminate or Secure Approval for Illicit Connections.
1. The Town Engineer/Public Works Director shall require by written notice that a person
responsible for an illicit connection to the storm drain system comply with the requirements of this
section to eliminate or secure approval for the connection by a specified date, regardless of
whether or not the connection or discharges to it had been established or approved prior to the
effective date of the ordinance codified in this section.
2. If, subsequent to eliminating a connection found to be in violation of this section, the
responsible person can demonstrate that an illegal discharge will no longer occur, said person may
request Town approval to reconnect. The reconnection or reinstallation of the connection shall be
at the responsible person’s expense. At the discretion of the Town Engineer/Public Works Director,
periodic, random monitoring may be required to ensure compliance with subsection (N) of this
section.
L. Watercourse Protection. As required by AZPDES Phase II regulations and Chapter 17 of the Oro Valley
Town Code, every person owning property through which a watercourse passes, or such person’s lessee, shall
keep and maintain that part of the watercourse within the property reasonably free of trash, debris, and other
obstacles that would pollute, contaminate, or significantly retard the flow of water through the watercourse. In
addition, the owner or lessee shall maintain existing privately owned structures within or adjacent to a
watercourse, so that such structures will not become a hazard to the use, function, or physical integrity of the
watercourse. Failure on the part of the property owner to comply may result in liabilities incurred and penalties
and fines imposed upon the property owner as defined in this section.
M. Requirement to Remediate. Whenever the Town Engineer/Public Works Director finds that a discharge
of pollutants is taking place or has occurred which will result in or has resulted in pollution of stormwater, the
Town’s MS4, or waters of the U.S., the Town Engineer/Public Works Director may convey by written notice to
the owner of the property and/or the responsible person the requirement for remediation of the pollution and the
restoration of affected property within a specified time pursuant to the provisions of subsections (S), (T), (U),
and (V) of this section. Failure to take prompt remedial action may result in fines, penalties, and liabilities
incurred under this section or other applicable laws.
N. Requirement to Monitor and Analyze. The Town may in the future be required to adhere to a total
maximum daily load (TMDL) or other restriction(s) to a specific pollutant or pollutants established by the State
of Arizona or the Federal Government. Should this occur, the Town Engineer/Public Works Director may, by
written notice, require that any person engaged in any activity and/or owning or operating any facility which
may cause or contribute these specific pollutants in stormwater to undertake at said person’s expense such
monitoring and analyses and furnish such reports to the Town of Oro Valley as deemed necessary to
determine compliance with this section. Additionally, regardless of the restrictions discussed above, the Town
Engineer/Public Works Director may, by written notice, require that any person engaged in any activity and/or
owning or operating any facility which may cause or contribute to stormwater pollution, illegal discharges,
and/or nonstormwater discharges to the storm drain/wash system or waters of the U.S., undertake at said
person’s expense such monitoring and analyses and furnish such reports to the Town of Oro Valley as deemed
necessary to determine compliance with this section.
O. Notification of Spills.
1. In the event of a spill or release in reportable quantities as defined in 40 CFR 302, 40 CFR
110, and 40 CFR 117, the person responsible for a facility or operation, or responsible for
emergency response for a facility shall take all necessary steps to ensure the discovery,
containment, and cleanup of such release. In the event of such a release said person shall
immediately notify emergency response officials of the occurrence via emergency dispatch
services (911). In the event of a release of nonhazardous materials, said person shall notify the
Town’s Public Works Department in person or by phone or facsimile no later than 5:00 p.m. of the
next business day. If the discharge of prohibited materials emanates from a commercial or
industrial establishment, the owner or operator of such establishment shall also document the type,
volume, cause of discharge, corrective actions taken, and remedial actions taken to prevent future
occurrences. This information shall be provided to the Town Engineer/Public Works Director in
writing within five (5) working days and shall also be retained by the owner/operator for at least
three (3) years.
2. Compliance with subsection (O)(1) requirements of this section shall not relieve the discharger
from the reporting requirements of 40 CFR 110, 117, and 302.
P. Maintenance of Stormwater Facilities.
1. Stormwater facilities shall be maintained per the approved drainage plans or manufacturer’s
specifications by the owner or other responsible party and shall be repaired and/or replaced by
such person when such facilities are no longer functioning as designed.
2. Disposal of waste from maintenance of facilities shall be conducted in accordance with
applicable Federal, State and local laws and regulations.
3. Records of installation and maintenance and repair of facilities referenced in subsection (P)(1)
of this section shall be retained by the owner or other responsible party for a period of three (3)
years and shall be made available to the Public Works Department upon request.
4. Any failure to maintain facilities or correct problems with facilities after receiving due notice
from the Town may result in criminal or civil penalties and the Town may perform corrective or
maintenance work which shall be at the owner’s expense.
Q. Authority to Inspect. Whenever necessary to make an inspection to enforce any provision of this section,
or whenever the Town Engineer/Public Works Director has cause to believe that there exists, or potentially
exists, in or upon any premises any condition which constitutes a violation of this section, the Town Engineer
may enter such premises at all reasonable times to inspect the same and to inspect and copy records related
to stormwater compliance. When inspections by Town staff reveal deficiencies in the implementation of the
SWPPP, a written inspection report will be provided to the owner and operator within fifteen (15) working days
of the inspection. In the event the owner or occupant refuses entry after a request to enter and inspect has
been made, the Town is hereby empowered to seek assistance from any court of competent jurisdiction in
obtaining such entry.
R. Authority to Sample, Establish Sampling Devices, and Test. During any inspection as provided herein,
the Town Engineer/Public Works Director may take any samples and perform any testing deemed necessary at
the expense of the owner/operator of the facility to aid in the pursuit of the inquiry or to record site activities.
S. Charges and Penalties. Charges and penalties levied pursuant to this section shall be collected by the
Department of Public Works, Stormwater Utility and utilized for activities in compliance with the Town’s MS4
permit. The Town Engineer shall make and enforce efficient management decisions in the maintenance and
protection of the Town’s storm drainage system.
T. Operator and/or Owner of Record. The operator performing on-site activities and/or owner of record of
the property upon which a violation of this section occurs shall be presumed to be the person having lawful
control over the activity or premises unless it is demonstrated and documented that another person has
knowingly and in good faith accepted responsibility for the activity at issue. If more than one (1) person is
identified as owner, such persons shall be presumed to be jointly and severally in lawful possession and control
of the premises or activity.
U. Notice to Correct. The Town may issue a written notice to correct to any person who has violated or is in
violation of this section. Failure to comply with actions described in and required by the notice to correct may
result in a notice of violation and/or stop work order as described in subsection (V) of this section.
V. Notice of Violation.
1. Whenever the Town Engineer/Public Works Director finds that a person has violated a
prohibition or failed to meet a requirement in accordance with a notice to correct (subsection (U) of
this section), the Town Engineer may order compliance by written notice of violation to the
responsible person. The written notice shall state the nature of the violation, the corrective action
required, the time frame for the corrective action, and penalties for continued noncompliance. The
notice shall be served by either personal service or certified mail to the owner, owner’s agent, the
operator, the occupant, or the lessee. Such notice may require the violator, without limitation, to:
a. Submit a corrective action plan utilizing best management practices to the authorized
representative indicating the cause of the violation, corrective actions to prevent recurrence,
and a proposed compliance schedule;
b. Perform monitoring, sampling, laboratory analysis, and reporting of results to the
authorized representative and pay costs associated with these activities;
c. Eliminate illicit connections or discharges;
d. Abate and remediate stormwater pollution or contamination hazards, restore affected
property, ensure that cleanup has been completed, and make operational changes to prevent
future violations;
e. Implement a corrective action plan utilizing source control treatment BMPs to prevent
stormwater pollution. Based on site conditions and nature of the contaminant, the authorized
representative will determine if the corrective action plan must be prepared, certified and
implemented by a qualified person, such as a professional engineer, landscape architect,
industrial hygienist registered with the State of Arizona or certified by the American Board of
Industrial Hygiene;
f. Stop work on clearing, grading, dredging, excavating, storing, transporting, and/or filling of
land, new construction, improvements, alterations, or additions;
g. Maintain, repair, and/or replace existing BMPs;
h. Stop any activity that is in violation of this section;
i. Abate/correct, within time frame specified in notice, any condition that is in violation of this
section;
j. Abate immediately any condition in violation of this section that the authorized
representative determines to present an immediate threat to public health, safety, or the
environment.
2. If abatement of a violation and/or restoration of affected property is required, the notice shall
set forth a deadline within which such remediation or restoration must be completed. Said notice
shall further advise that, should the violator fail to remediate or restore within the established
deadline, the work will be done by the Town or a contractor designated by the Town
Engineer/Public Works Director and the expense thereof shall be charged to the violator pursuant
to subsection (AA) of this section.
3. Failure to comply with any action required by the notice of violation shall be a separate
violation for each day beyond the thirtieth calendar day following the notice of violation. Nothing in
this section shall limit the authority of the Town to take any action, including emergency actions or
other enforcement action, without first issuing a notice of violation.
W. Civil Penalties. In addition to any other enforcement authority contained in this section, the Town may
issue a civil citation to any person who has violated, or continues to violate, any provision of this section or any
related laws or regulations. A person who is found to have violated any requirement of this section shall be
civilly liable to the Town for a sum not to exceed two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) per day for each
violation.
X. Criminal Penalties. A person who willfully or negligently violates any provision of this section shall, upon
conviction, be guilty of a class one misdemeanor and may be sentenced to a fine not to exceed two thousand
five hundred dollars ($2,500) per day for each violation, imprisonment for a period not to exceed six (6) months
and/or probation not to exceed three (3) years.
Y. Violations Deemed a Public Nuisance. In addition to the enforcement processes and penalties
hereinbefore provided, any condition caused or permitted to exist in violation of any of the provisions of this
section is a threat to public health, safety, and welfare, and is declared and deemed a nuisance, and may be
summarily abated or restored by the Town at the violator’s expense, and/or the Town may bring a civil action to
abate, enjoin, or otherwise compel the cessation of such nuisance.
Z. Appeal.
1. Appeals of any determination made by the Town Engineer/Public Works Director relating to a
notice of violation issued pursuant to subsection (V) of this section may be made to the Stormwater
Utility Commission.
2. Appeals under this section must be filed with the Town Clerk within ten (10) business days
from issuance of the notice of violation.
3. Decisions of the Stormwater Utility Commission shall be final unless, within ten (10) days from
the date of the Commission’s decision, the applicant appeals the decision to the Town Council. An
appeal to the Town Council shall be filed in writing with the Town Clerk and scheduled for the next
available regular Council meeting.
AA. Charging Cost of Abatement/Liens. Within thirty (30) days after abatement of the nuisance by the
Town, the Town Engineer/Public Works Director shall notify the property owner of the cost of abatement plus
twenty percent (20%) to cover administrative costs. If the amount due is not paid within sixty (60) days of the
notification to pay, the charges shall become a special assessment against the property and shall constitute a
lien on the property for the amount of the assessment. A copy of the resolution shall be turned over to the
County Assessor so that the Assessor may enter the amounts of the assessment against the parcel as it
appears on the current assessment roll, and the Assessor shall include the amount of the assessment on the
bill for taxes levied against the parcel of land.
BB. Urgency Abatement. The Town Engineer/Public Works Director is authorized to require immediate
abatement of any violation of this section that constitutes an immediate threat to the health, safety or well-being
of the public. If any such violation is not abated immediately as directed by the Town Engineer/Public Works
Director, the Town is authorized to enter onto private property and to take any and all measures required to
remediate the violation. Any expense related to such remediation undertaken by the Town shall be fully
reimbursed by the property owner and/or responsible party. Any relief obtained under this section shall not
prevent the Town from seeking other and further relief authorized under this section.
CC. Penalties and Corrective Actions.
1. It shall be unlawful for any person to violate any provision or fail to comply with any of the
requirements of this section. The remedies provided in this subsection are cumulative and the
Town may seek one (1) or more such remedies as described in subsections (V), (W), (X), and (Y)
of this section.
2. Any person violating this section shall be liable to the Town for all damages, costs, fines, and
penalties incurred by the Town.
3. Upon finding that any person has violated this section, the Court may issue an order or, in the
case of a criminal conviction, terms of probation, requiring the violator to perform any of the
remediation activities listed in subsection (V) of this section.
4. If more than one person is identified as the owner of record, all persons will be presumed to be
jointly and severally in lawful possession and control of the property and/or activity. The transfer of
ownership, possession, or control of real property to another person does not relieve the transferor
of the responsibility for violations of this title that occurred before the transfer.
((O)08-20, Amended, 10/01/08; (O)08-15, Added, 09/03/08)
DATE: 01-21-2016
STORMWATER UTILITY -DEVELOPMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY I 11000 N La Canada Drive, Oro Valley, AZ 85737
Stormwater Utility Mission
To provide safe and efficient management of the Stormwater Utility, promote and
protect life and safety, water quality, and the Town's working and natural environments
before, during , and after the occurrence of storm events in accordance with all Town
codes , standards and policies.
ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL
Dr. Satish I. Hiremath, Mayor
Lou Waters, Vice Mayor
Brendan Burns, Council Member
William Garner, Council Member
Joe Hornat, Council Member
Mary Snider, Council Member
Mike Zinkin, Council Member
ORO VALLEY STORMWATER UTILITY COMMISSION
David Parker, Chair
Michael Stankiewicz, Vice Chair
Jim Mikolaitis, Commissioner
John Lynch, Commissioner
Frederick Wayand, Commissioner
TOWN STAFF
Greg Caton, Town Manager
Stacey Lemos, Finance Director
Paul Keesler P.E., Director
Aimee Ramsey, Assistant Director
Phil Trenary, Operations Manager
Michael Todnem P.E., Stormwater Sr. Civil Engineer
Page 11
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYS IS I Date " 01-21-2016
Table of Contents
PART I. Executive Summary ................................................................................................. 3
PART II. Program Information and Background .................................................................... 6
Stormwater Infrastructure ................................................................................................... 6
Background ............................................................................................................................. 8
Stormwater Purpose ........................................................................................................... 8
Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) -Stormwater Quality ............................ 10
Part III: Stormwater Utility Rate Proposal ............................................................................. 12
Current Funding ................................................................................................................ 12
Revenue Forecast and Requirements .............................................................................. 14
Organization Chart ................................................................................................................ 16
Proposed Stormwate r Utility Division Structure ................................................................ 16
Appendices
Appendix A -Stormwater Fund 5 Year Forecast ........................................................... A -i
Appendix B -Stormwater Utility Satus Quo Funding Chart .......................................... A -ii
Appendix C -Stormwate r Fund Preferred Scenario 5 Year Forecast.. ........................ A -iii
Appendix D -Sto r mwater Fund Preferred Scenarion Chart ......................................... A -iv
Appendix E -Stormwater Project Listing ....................................................................... A -v
Appendix F -Western Kentucky University .................................................................. A -vi
Appendix G -Equivalent Residential Un it Study ........................................................ A -vii
Page 12
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date 01-21-2016
PART I. Executive Summary
In Oro Valley the Stormwater program was initiated to fulfil the Environmental Protection
Agency 's minimum requirement to regulate first flush pollutants which may enter our
waterways. The Town's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4) permitted activities
are part of this program and as discussed further will describe Stormwater Quality.
Additionally the town has responsibilities regarding flood protection and floodplain
management for our community that require maintenance and additional monitoring of
aging Stormwater conveyance infrastructure hence known as Stormwater Quantity. This
may require debris and sediment removal, vegetation management, facilities maintenance
and possibly new facility construction for safety concerns .
The Stormwater Utility is responsible for Stormwater Quality and Stormwater Quantity.
The functions and duties of the Oro Valley Stormwater Utility Commission "Commission"
include reviewing and developing recommendations for Stormwater revenue requirements,
Stormwater rates and fee structures . Controlling the quantity of Stormwater drainage runoff
and aiding in water quality management has become essential in keeping our water safe for
all of its many uses.
The Stormwater Utility has been in place since 2004 and associated fees since 2007 . Since
the initial rate was established no formal review of the program and associated rates has
taken place. It is the intention of the Commission to annually evaluate the rates and
analyze them to assure the recommendations meet Town policies and ensure the financia l
stability of the program and associated projects.
This Stormwater Rate Analysis Report conta ins detailed informatio n on the Stormwater
Utility fund. The Stormwater Ut ility (Utility) is an enterprise of the Town and generates
revenue from rates, fees and charges and does not receive revenue from taxes or
payments from the General Fund. The management of the monthly utility fees include
personne l , operations and maintenance of the Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer
Systems (MS4) Program. The Utility pays the General Fund for services received including
finance, human resources, information technology, legal, insurance and rental of office
space . The Utility also pays the Water Department for billing and receiving of the monthly
utility fee. In addition, since the Util ity does not have its own maintenance crew, the Utility
pays the Highway Fund for associated expenditures including street sweeping, storm
cleanup and drainage channel vegetation management. The Utility also hires local
contractors to complete Stormwater projects that exceed the work load capabilities of the
operations street crew. This past fiscal year contract expenditures totaled just under
$100,000 for contract maintenance that included culvert cleaning, erosion
control/stabilization and street drainage interceptors
The Stormwater Utility Commission has made a recommendation for a Preferred Financial
Scenario (PFS). The PFS has been se lected to meet the mandated requirements as
outlined under the Stormwater Town Code 1S-24-13-H. The Town Council , by resolution ,
shall establish the annual (fiscal year) monthly base rate for the Stormwater Utility fee. The
base rate shall be calculated to ensure adequate revenues to fund the costs of stormwater
management and to provide for the operation , maintenance, and capital improvements of
the stormwate r system in the Town.
Page 13
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date 01-21-2016
Under the Preferred Financial Scenario, the Operating Fund will have an approximate
ending cash balance of just over $200K at the end of the five-year projection period. A cash
balance of 15% (based on revenue projection) is required by Town Code. This amount
preserves a balance of 17% to 25% depending on the fiscal year and the associated capital
expenditure requirements. The Preferred Financial Scenario includes cash funding to
preserve $50K per year for culvert and wash cleaning as well as increased expenditures on
internal small projects by $80,000 per year or $400,000 over the five-year period. The
Preferred Financial Scenario proposes no other new debt for capital expenditures .
This is the first year since establishment of the rate in 2007 that the rate has been reviewed .
The Stormwater Rate Analysis is prepared based on the most up-to-date information
available for a five-year projection period. It is important to note that there was a five-year
moratorium on fee adjustments from 2007 until 2012.
Operational needs and capital improvement requirements change annually and are carefully
evaluated when they are included in the analysis. The Stormwater Utility Commission over
the last 18 months reviewed several scenarios, however, based on the necessary funding
amounts required to meet mandated outcomes, maintenance requirements, and have a
five-year sustainable rate the proposed $4 .50 fee per ERU was recommended. Table 1
reflects the proposed rate changes to the Stormwater Utility fee.
Table 1
Stormwater Preferred Funding Scenario
FY 2015/16
Monthly Stormwater Utility Fee/Unit Curr~nt
Residential Rate $2.90
Commercial Rate $2.90
ERU = Square Feet 5,000
# of Units:
Residential 17,460
Commercial 5 ,068
Total Units: 22 ,528
Revenue:
Gross Revenues $ 783 ,974
Funding from Outside Sources $ 3,250
Grant Funds (one time) $ 35,000
$ 822,224
Additional Revenue
Purpose of Fee
• Program Development -project definition
• Program Proposal -project design and costing
o Budget development
Page 14
FY 2016/17
Change ~RU
$4.50
$4.50
4,000
17,749
6,335
24,084
$ 1,300,536
$ 3 ,250
I $ 1,303,786 1
$ 516,562
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date 01-21-2016
o CIP development
• Construction Management
o New projects
o Maintenance Oversight
• Increased Inspections due to State and Federal reporting regulations
o Newly identified washes
o Additional residential requirements
• Management of existing assets
o Review of status of infrastructure stability
o Service and maintenance work order schedules
o Annual review
Page 15
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date 01-21-2016
PART II. Program Information and Background
Why Must We Manage Stormwater?
The Town of Oro Valley administers, operates, and maintains a Stormwater Utility meant to:
~ Preserve valuable natural resources
~ Protect people and property
~ Reduce nuisance flooding
~ Improve water quality
The U.S. EPA has estimated that about 30 percent of known pollution to our nation's waters
is attributable to stormwater runoff. In 1987, Congress directed U.S. EPA to develop a
regulatory program to address the stormwater problem. The U.S. EPA issued regulations in
1990 authorizing the creation of a N PDES permitting system for stormwater discharges
from a select group of industrial activities. The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) is the administrative mechanism chosen for the stormwater permitting
program. In Arizona , this program is called Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(AZPDES). An AZPDES permit is required for any point source discharge of pollutants to
the Waters of the United States. Because stormwater runoff can transport pollutants to
either a municipal separate storm sewer system or to the Waters of the United States ,
permits are requ ired for those discharges .
ADEQ has prepared a draft 2016 Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System Genera l
Permit (Small MS4 GP) that is intended to succeed the 2002 Small MS4 GP (Permit No .
AZG2002-002) which is currently administratively continued. The review and subsequent
adoption of th is general permit is scheduled to occur in early 2016 . The draft general permit
2016 builds on the requirements of the previous general permit and is designed to control
pollutants to the Maximum Extent Practicable (MEP). The new draft requires updates in the
SWMP consistent with the specific 'permit requirements , implementing the program and
evaluating the BMP's as an iterative process to ensure BMP effectiveness. The new draft
permit will contain more specific tasks and details than the current 2002 general program
and therefore require additional management and program compliance to control pollutants .
Stormwater Infrastructure
Table 2
The Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) conducted an audit of Oro Valley's
Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) program to assess compliance with the
Town's MS4 permit and Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP) on February 26-27, 2014.
Page 16
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date : 01-21-2016
The audit included document reviews , interviews with Town program managers , and field
verification inspections. During the audit, ADEQ noted areas of potential noncompliance with
the permit. According to the Arizona Administrative Code (MC.) RI8-9-A905(A)(3)(a) and 40
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 122.41 (h), the Town is required to submit information to
ADEQ regarding compliance with the Permit and the Town's Stormwater Management Plan.
This plan was submitted and accepted September 30, 2015.
The Preferred Financial Scenario rate increase to $4.50 per month with a reduction in the
Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU) to 4,000 square feet will allow the Stormwater Utility to
meet:
~ MS4 compliance and review minimums as addressed in the Stormwater
Management Plan submittal (Stormwater Quality)
o Redesign program to meet new 2016 General Permit Requirements as
outlined by ADEQ
~ Infrastructure Project Identification 20% to 30% level (Stormwater Quantity)
-costing
-design
-build under $80K projects
~ Work order development (Stormwater Quality and Quantity)
-Prioritization of inspection and maintenance scheduling
-increased inspections
-increased Public Education
~ Stormwater Utility Program Sustainability
-5 years
Note : Program sustainability only accounts for funds to preserve activities defined above.
Additional County or other external funds must become available to pay for larger capital
projects which will be identified. In the absence of County or other external funds, the rate
structure will need to be revised again within one or two years or so that large capital
projects identified by the new staff can be completed and funded by the Stormwater Utility.
Page 17
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date 01-21-2016
Background
Oro Valley is located in northern Pima County approximately six miles north of the Tucson
city limits. The valley itself was formed by the Canada Del Oro Creek that begins in the
Santa Catalina Mountains. The town sits at an elevation of 2,620 feet, covers over 34
square miles and has a current population of just over 41 ,000. Oro Valley was incorporated
in April, 1974 .
The Town initially became covered by the NPDES General Permit For Discharges from
Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4) in 2004. This permit, often simply
called a "Stormwater Permit," is required by the US Environmental Protection Agency and is
implemented in Arizona by the Ar izona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ).
Neither the US EPA nor the State of Arizona provides any funding to Oro Valley for the
operation of the Stormwater Program.
Most cities and counties with a population greater than 10,000 and/or located in an
"urbanized area " as defined by the US Census must follow this perm it , which regulates
discharges of stormwater runoff to Waters of the United States.
Stormwater Purpose
The St ormwater Utility program is responsible for meeting all quality and quantity issue s
including the Town's Stormwater Management Plan , Floodplain and Erosion Ha z ard
Management, and supporting all other Town programs that are impacted by storm
events. This prog ram a lso coordinates with Federal , St ate and local govern m ent agencies
related to the Town's Stormwate r program .
. Typica l Stormwater Utility Activities Include :
• Implementation of all MS4 , AD EQ and EPA req u irements
• Drainage Channel and Street Shoulder Vegetation Maintenance (Quantity)*
• Storm System Inspections and maintenance/cleaning (Quantity)of culverts , basins ,
grade control structures, storm sewer inlets/outlets and drainage channels
• Storm Cleanup
o Street Sweep ing (Quality) -
Stormwater determination * vs Normal
st reet surface deterioration
o Low water crossings
(Quantity/Quantity)depositing sand ,
rock , boulders and vegetation debris
removal in roads during larger events
of monsoons
• Storm generated Debris Removal * in
washes (Quantity)
• Road Sa fety (Quantity) due to storm
activity at low water crossings and
shouldering due to erosion *
• Publ ic Educati on and Ou t reach(Quality)
• Techn ical Support for other division s within the Town(Quality/Quantity)
Page 18
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date 01-21-2016
• Minor Construction and Repair Projects (Quantity)-Post storm event structural damage
that endangers the public or may realize more extensive damage if not repaired
immediately*
• In-House Hydrologic and Hydraul ic Studies and Designs(Quantity)
• Floodplain Permit Review (Quantity/Quality)
• Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Plan Review (Quantity)
• Development Review (Quantity/Quality)Preparing and Revising/Updating Town
Ordinances and Manuals (Quality/Quantity)
The Stormwater Utility fee also reimburses the Highway Fund for utilization of the streets
crews for some of the activities listed above and marked with an (*). The allocated
expenditures are determined by task and scope and are assigned to the Stormwater Utility
funds and are not considered routine street maintenance .
Page 19
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date : 01-21-2016
Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) -Stormwater Quality
The permit provides requirements in each of the following six Minimum Control Measures
(MCM):
1. Public Education and Outreach
2. Public Involvement/Participation
3. Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination
4. Construction Site Stormwater Runoff Control
5. Post-Construction Stormwater Management in New Development and Re-
Development
6. Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations
More information about each of these six main categories is provided below.
Public Education and Outreach & Public Involvement/Participation
These two related topics focus on educating and involving the public in all areas of
stormwater management. Several factors associated with the program costs:
• The size of community and our target audience in order to increase Stormwater
awareness
• The ability to tie into other municipal/3rd Party education programs versus
developing our own
• Types of education and outreach media used
• The method of distribution through available volunteer activities/programs
• The methods of measuring success and reporting to ADEQ.
Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination
Our Stormwater Permit requires and is dependent upon identifying and eliminating "illicit
discharges." Town Code Article 15-24-14 defines the Town's Stormwater Quality
Management System and Discharge Control Ordinance, passed in 2008. It defines "illicit
discharges," prohibits them, and provides for enforcement options to eliminate them.
Program costs associated with eliminating "illicit discharges" are generated from the age
and extent of infrastructure, the mapping status and inventory of entire drainage system. At
present, services are based upon a complaint-based system versus a more costly proactive
detection. Current revenue covers staffing, contractor management, equipment to detect
discharges, and identify the source and cost of the actual repairs. It also includes Software
cost for database management, reporting and program evaluation.
Construction Site Stormwater Runoff Control
The next requirement of the Stormwater Permit is the control of runoff from construction
sites. Discharge of sediment or other waste (concrete truck washout, litter, etc.) from
construction sites is prohibited by the Town.
A permit is required for any land disturbance of any size inside the Town with a few
exceptions. Permit information and an application form may be picked up at the Town
Page 110
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date : 01-21-2016
located at 10000 N La Canada Drive or may be downloaded from this website page. Please
call one of the contacts at the top of the page for more information. In addition, any land
disturbance totaling more than one acre requires a permit from the Arizona Department of
Environmental Quality (ADEQ).
Program costs associated with this program element are dependent on the number of active
construction sites , the number of development projects in the pipeline, the average number
of inspections per site, and the current compliance record along with the efficiency of
enforcement.
Post-Construction Stormwater Management in New Development and Re-Development
Our Stormwater Permit requires treatment of stormwater runoff from areas of new
development and re-development. The cost factors associated with this part of the program
are dependent upon the number of development projects requiring municipal review and
inspection , the age and type of existing stormwater best management practices, future
enhancement of the review process to look for and encourage a site design, land use
planning for low impact development , and possible code updates to allow/foster green
infrastructure .
Pollu t ion Prevention/Good Housekeeping For Municipal Operations
The final of the six stormwater permit requirements involves the Town's own operations.
The Town must evaluate all sources of potential pollution such as streets and roads,
municipal parking lots , maintenance shops, outdoor storage areas, construction activities ,
parks maintenance and landscaping, and salt storage . Procedures to eliminate or reduce
the potential for pollution must be developed , and employees must be trained on these
procedures at least annually. Cost factors associated with this requirement include the
number of Town facilities requiring pollution prevention plans, street sweeping and catch
basin deanout equipment and labor, and employee education and training .
Storm Mitigation
Clean up cost FY 2015 $34,000
Page 111
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date 01-21-2016
Part III: Stormwater Utility Rate Proposal
Current Funding
Neither t he State of Arizo na nor the federal gov ernment provides funding for the Town's
Storm w ater Program. In 2007, the Town estab lished a Stormwater Uti l ity fee to pro v ide
funding for implement ing the requirements of the Stormwater Permit and for small cleaning
proj ects /larger project research and draft plans that cou ld be subm itted for county project
c o nsiderati o n.
Pima County Regional Flood Control District (PCFCD) under the State of Arizona enabling
legislation (Title 48 of ARS), is des ignated as a spec ial taxing d istrict and given the authority
to levy secondary property tax on parcels within the Town of Oro Valley. The Town of Oro
Valley and PCFCD have a very good relationship and over the past 10 years have been
successful in the delivery of both large and small Stormwater projects. However, this
funding is variable and not always available. In addition, the Flood Control District levy only
provides funding for quantity issues and quality issues are so lely the responsibility of the
Town.
When the Stormwater Utility was first established, funding for projects was secured through
the budgeting process and overseen by Town consultants . The FEMA Lomas Del Oro
project in FY 09/10 was the last big project to be overseen by the Town . Since this time the
PCFCD requests project submittals and then prioritizes them to determine which projects
will move forward. This year Pima County Flood Control District has provided significant
support in the area of wash maintenance. However, benefits from our partnership with
PCFCD range from limited small clean up to large project and include capacity for drainage
study. While a dedicated funding estimate is not available, the Town will continue to
request assistance. From January through July of 2015, PCFCD contracted to have four
lineal miles of debris and sediment removed, clearing existing blockages to improve
channel flow and subsequently enab ling mosquito abatement in areas throughout the east
side of Town. Fortunately structura l damage has been minimal and no major structural
damage has occurred.
Pima County Regional Flood Control District and other sources
Annual Contribution to Oro Valley
Funding FY 2010-11
Direct $ 3,507
Projects $ 471,0 00
Sediment
Removal $ -
Other So urces $1,329,000
Projects
Linda Vista Gabions
Poinsetta Dr
Lomas Del Oro
La Canada Underpass to date
COO River Park
FY 2011-12
$ 28,567
$ -
$ -
$ -
COO River Park Pedestrian Bridge
110 and La Canada Underpass improvements
Oracle Road Underpass i mprovements
Page 112
FY 2012-13 FY 2013-14
$ -$ -
$ 304,663 $ 290,000
$ -$ -
$ -$ -
In progress
In progress
FY 2014-15 FY 2015-16
$ -$ -
$1,062,561 $ 731,862
$ 101,750 $ 118,600
$ -$ -
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date : 01-21-2016
The PCFCD has already informed Stormwater staff that next year 's funding will be limited.
In addition , some items once available for funding such as low water crossings are no
longer eligible for funding even though they remain a safety concern for the Town . The
number of town projects is growing as more washes are identified and evaluated .
Attachment E lists all known drainage and Stormwater issues regardless of size and scope
that have been identified at this time. The Stormwater Utility intends to utilize part of the
increased funding to develop not only a project list, but develop the designated project to a
design level that will include costing scenarios for those projects under the Stormwate r
Utility purview. This process will allow the Town sound budgeting pract ices to evaluate
capital improvements and identify projects to submit for potential funding from the Pima
County Flood Control District. The new asset manager/engineer will be responsible for
defining these projects including separating out unit costs for services/deliverables .
Current Rate
Single-family residences currently pay $2 .90 per month, charged to their water bill or
separately by the Town. Commercial facilities and non-profits are also charged $2.90 pe r
"E quivalent Residential Unit" (ERU) of imperv ious area (driveways, patios, roofs, or othe r
areas where stormwater does not infil trate into the ground). At present an ERU is equal to
5,000 square feet per Town Code 15-24-13-G. The Preferred Financial Scenario includes a
five year proj ection of the fund and evaluates the impact of future costs and revenue
sources that w ill be required to meet those costs.
In order to cover various alternatives staff conducted an impervious area samp le distributio n
study this year to best determine the basic ERU value . The result of the study indicates tha t
the Town 's average rounded ERU value is 3,700 square feet. The report is provided under
Attachment F. Because the data used in the study may not include all impermeable
surfaces , e.g. some driveways , the Commission recommends an ERU value of 4,000
square as more representative . Therefore the recommendation along w ith the rate
adjustment is to reduce the ERU value to 4 ,000 sq . ft . This new ERU change will requ ire
the Town Code to be modified to reflect this new value. Along with the rate change the
revised Town Code will be submitted to Town Counci l for consideration and approval.
National Average
There are currently 1511 Sto r mwater Utilities throughout the United States (Campbell , 2011).
Western Kentucky University annually updates and provides access to their very extensive
Stormwater Utility database as summarized in Appendix F. This survey provides us the
opportunity to compare the Town 's current rate structure with others nationally. However, the
Western Kentucky University data survey results does not contain information about the
scope of activities of responding Utilities. The Oro Valley Stormwater Utility is performing
quality and quantity work whereas many survey responders may perform only quality work,
so direct comparison may not be representat ive .
The average national rate, as of the 2014 st udy , was $4 .01 per month . The rates range from
"no fee " to $35 .00 dollars per month to accommodate va rious programs with 10.6% of t he
national rates being $2.50 to $2.99, over 34 .5% of the utilities have rates averaging $3.00 to
$6 .00 per month . In addi t ion, for towns compa rable in population to Oro Valley , approximately
Page 113
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date: 01-21-2016
256, the average monthly rate was cited as $4 .26. The other noted comparison was the
equivalent residential unit (ERU) value of impervious surface. Only 11.5% of the utilities had
an ERU between 4,000 and 5 ,000 square feet. Over 22.8% classified an ERU as between
2 ,500 to 3,250 square feet. Many of the utilities , over 51.2% had an unspecified ERU.
Required Program Highlights
The additional funding proposed will not on ly provide for the sustainability of the core
program, but also for increased utility infrastructure assets and associated maintenance
requirements as well as fund the development of small specific community infrastructure
projects.
ADEQ has prepared a draft 2015 Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System General
Permit (Small MS4 GP) intended to succeed the 2002 Small MS4 GP (Permit No.
AZG2002-002). This draft is scheduled to be adopted in early 2016 , significantly changing
and adding definition to the Minimum Control Measures (MCM) required by each MS4 .
Adoption of the new rate will provide funding for necessary staffing to ensure continued
compliance.
Revenue Forecast and Requirements
Appendix A is a five year forecast for the Stormwater Utility should no rate increase occur.
As depicted in the chart, the utility has a structural deficit. The FY 2016-17 recommended
budget from staff would not meet the required reserve fund as outlined in the Town Code
15-24-10. A chart of the Stormwater Utility Fund is depicted in Append ix B.
The revenue forecast was based on analysis of the Stormwater Utility's monthly bill i ng data
from FY 2015-16 and a projection of growth in the number of housing units expected to be
developed over the next five years. The revenue projects a flat fee not dependent on any
type of usage but is only coordinated with the total number of ERU's calculated within the
Town. The growth projected in residential units is determined by the Development and
Infrastructure permitting staff based on trend analysis .
Appendix C provides the detailed information for moving forward with the Preferred Funding
Scenario . A rate adjustment of $1.60 from $2.90 to $4.50 would provide for a stable and
compliant Stormwater program. The increase is adopted through Mayor and Council
resolution which was last reviewed November 7 ,2007 .
Over the past 8 years the Stormwater Management Program has developed. The
opportunity presented to the Town with the initia l fee structure allowed staff to develop
principles and best practices to meet the requirements defined under the ADEQ MS4
program. The division produced its first annual report in 2008 and recently completed its
first EPAJADEQ Town wide audit. The program requirements to accomplish the utilities
mission have been better defined and quantified revealing funding shortfalls . With the
aftermath of the audit, potential future audits, and structural deficit, the rate increase is a
necessity.
The future expenditures stay relatively stable and grow to meet the projected personnel
costs , increase to support the Program Development, Design , Construction Management &
Page 114
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYS IS I Date 01-21-2016
Maintenance program projects as outlined (see note on page 7 regarding program
sustainability). In addition, the expenditures include a 3.5 percent annual merit increases.
These projected increases are consistent with the General Fund's financial planning . The
projected operations and maintenance (O&M) costs include inflationary increases in some
areas that average 1.7 percent annually. The inflation factors were provided by the Arizona
Department of Revenue .
Page 115
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date" 01-21-2016
Organization Chart
Proposed Stormwater Utility Division Structure
Page 116
i Position 100
percent funded by
Utilitv.
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date 01-21-2016
Maintaining our washes
Before
After
Rooney Wash
Page 117
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date : 01-21-2016
Appendices
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date : 01-21-2016
Intentionally Blank
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date 01-21-2016
Appendix A -Stormwater Fund Status Quo 5 Year Forecast
Stormwater Fund 5 Year Forecast Revised: 1/2212016 . -•• ---
FY 2015/16 I FY 2016/17 I FY 2017118 I FY 2018/19 I FY 2019/20 I FY 2020/21
Budgeted I Draft Projected
# of Units:
Residential 15,764 16,107 16,496 16,827 17,053 17,203
NEW: projected Residential 343 389 331 226 150 150
Commercial 3,852 4,063 4,063 4,063 4 ,063 4,063
NEW: projected Ccmmercial 211 ----
Metro Water -Residenti al 1,353 1,353 1,353 1,353 1,353 1,353
Metro Water -Commercial 1,005 1,005 1,005 1,005 1 ,005 1,005
Total Units: 22,528 22,917 23,248 23,474 23,624 23,774
Carry forward Fund Balance $ 299,844 $ 192,953 $ 93,695 $ (13,187) $ (85,369}1 $ (172 ,723
Revenue :
IMonthly Stonnwater Utility Fee/Unit I $ 2 .90 $ 2.90 $ 2.90 $ 2.90 $ 2.90 I $ 2.90
Gross Re~nues $ 783,974 $ 797,5 12 $ 809,030 $ 816,895 $ 822,115 $ 827,335
Fund in g from Outside Sources 3,250 3,331 3,415 3,500 3,587 3,677
Grant Funds 35,000
$ 822,224 $ 800,843 $ 812,445 $ 820,395 $ 825,703 $ 831 ,012
Expenses: 3.5%
Personnel
3.80 Current Staff
Total Personnel: $ 346,620 $ 345,568 $ 357,663 $ 370,181 $ 383,137 $ 396,547
Contracts/Services
Outside Professiona l Services· 116,795 a 117,963 119,143 120,334 121 ,537 122,753
Low Impact Development 35,000
Other 50,000 50,000 50,000 SO ,OOO 50,000 50,000
Stormwater Maintenance 134,000 b 138,690 143,544 148,568 153,768 159,150
Vehicle Repair & Maintenance 19,800 · 19,998 20,198 20,400 20,604 20,8 10
Equipment Repair & Maintenance 32,000 · 32,320 32,643 32,970 33,299 33,632
Rentals 250 3 253 255 258 260 263
Telecommunications 1,400 · 1,414 1,428 1,442 1,457 1,471
Postage 250 a 253 255 258 260 263
Printing & Binding 1,000 a 1,010 1,020 1,030 1,041 1,051
Tra",,1 & Training 5 ,000 a 5,050 5,101 5 ,152 5 ,203 5,255
Membership 7,500 a 7,575 7,651 7,727 7,805 7,883
Office Supplies 2,000 · 2,020 2,040 2 ,061 2 ,081 2 ,102
Gasoli ne 24,500 · 24,745 24,992 25,242 25,495 25,750
Unifonns 750 · 758 765 773 780 788
Bad Debt Expense 750 a 758 765 773 780 788
Field Supplies 9,000 a 9,090 9,181 9,273 9,365 9,459
Safety 500 a 505 510 515 520 526
Software Mai ntenance & Licensing 1,500 a 1,515 1,530 1,545 1 ,561 1,577
SW Proj ects 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
Depreciat ion 135,000 135,000 135,000 135,000 135,000 135,000
Tota l Contracts/Services : $ 626,995 $ 598,915 $ 606,021 $ 613,320 $ 620,818 $ 628,520
Capital Ou tl ay/Projects
Minor Assets 2,500 · 2,525 2,550 2,576 2,602 2,628
Misc -Mos. Trapping 3,407 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500
Vehicle/Equipment Rese"", 38,000 38,000 38,000 38,000 38,000 38,000
New Vehicles ---
Cap ital Interest 305 305 305 ---
Equ ipment 46,288 46,288 46,288 --
Total Capital Outlay $ 90,500 $ 90,618 $ 90,643 $ 44,076 $ 44,102 $ 44,128
Total Expenses: $ 1,064,115 $ 1,035,101 $ 1,054,327 $ 1,027,577 I $ 1,048,057 I $ 1,069,195
Ending Balance/Conti ngency Reserve $ 192,953 1$ 93,6951 $ (13,187)1 $ (85,369}1 $ (172,723}1$ (275,905)
24.6% 11 .7% -1.6% -10.5% -21.0% -33.3%
Vehicles ----
Equ ipment ----50,000
Veh i cle/Equipm ent Rese rve -Replacem ent $ 90,806 1$ 128,806 I $ 166,806 I $ 204,806 I $ 242,806 I $ 230,806
~ Assumes Growth in Benefits & Wages 3.5% b
~ Intemal drainage projects remain the same
~ Cost Escalation 1.0% a
No tes:
> continue to charge out operations su pport to Hwy Fund per current method
> ending re""nue amounts are estimates subject to further reviSion s, and may not tie to cash balance in fund due to timing of re""nues and
expenditures
A-i
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date ' 01-21-2016
Appendix B -Stormwater Utility Status Quo Fund ing Charts
A-i i
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date 01-21-2016
Town of Oro Valley :~.
~ Stormwater Utility Division
Fiscal Year FY11/12
Revenue $ 792.987 $
Expenses $ 788,247 $
CHART 1 • Status Quo Funding Chart
FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15
826 .738 $ 760,629 $ 771,888 $
1,055,761 $ 913,564 $ 1,1 20,268 $
FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17118 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 '
822.224 $ 800,843 $ 812,445 $ 820.395 $ 825,703 $ 831 ,012
1,064,115 $ 1,035,101 $ 1,054,327 $ 1 ,027 ,577 $ 1,048,057 $ 1,069,195
Cash Balance $ 549,974 $ 509,768 $ 516,740 $ 299,844 $ 192,953 $ 93,695 $ (13 ,187) $ (85,369) $ (172,723) $ (275 ,905)
Required Cash Balance $ 118.948 $ 124,011 $ 114,094 $ 115,783 $ 123,334 $ 120,126 $ 121 ,867 $ 12 3,059 $ 123,855 $ 124,652
STORMWATER UTILITY FUND
2,500.000 =.= Revenue =.= b:pl'!r\~e!. =e= C.lsh BClliitKe =4= fH~qUlrecJ (<'Ish Balancf-'
2,000,000
1,500.000
1,000,000 .~::===.~. _. . . . . . --. . . . . . . .
?oo.ooo
-=~;t. '" ~ -=~-,.. . . .---....--,= .... ==!---==-.-=. -==-,.. ,.. ,.. Iii.
·500,000
·1,000,000
FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY J5/.16 FY 16/17 FY17/18 FY18/19 FY 19/20 FY20/21 '
=e= R~;v~nuE,l $792,987 $826.738 $760,629 $ 771,888 $822,224 $800,843 $812,445 $820.395 $825,703 $831,012
=.= EXlJenses $788,247 $1,055,76J $913,564 $1,120,268 $1,064,115 $1,035,101 $1,054,327 $1,027,577 $1,048,057 $1,069,195
=.= (ilsh Balance $549,974 $509,768 55 16,740 5299.844 $192,953 $93.695 $(13,187) $185,369) $(17],723) $(275,905)
="'= ReqUired «'Ish Balanct· 5118,948 $124,011 $114,094 $115,783 $123,334 5120,126 $12J,867 $123,059 $123,855 $J24,652
"FY 2020121 begin use of vehicle reserve for veh icle and equipment purchases.
F:12 DIV OPERATIONSISTORMWATERI1 COMMISION RATE 2014_2015 REVEIWISTORMWATER FEE INCREASE FINAL RATE INCREASE· CHANG ES PER PAUl
Appen d ix C -Stormwater Fund Preferred Scenario -5 Year Forecast
Stormwater Preferred Funding Option -5-year projection Re\4sed: 1/11 /20 16
FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17
Monthly Stormwatcr Utility Fee/Unit Current Change ERU Notes
Residentia l Rate $2.90 $4.50 51.60 increase
Commercia l Rate $2.90 $4.50 S1.60 inc rease
ERU::;:; Square Feet 5,000 4,000 'Commercial may apply for credit
# of Units: Change in ERU requires the Town Code to
Residential 17.460 17,749 be modified
Commercial 5,066 6,335 Change in rate is accomplished through a
Total Units: 22,528 24.084 resolution
Carryforward Fund Balance 1 $ 299,8441 Is 192,953
Revenue: • Corrects structural deficient
Gross Rewnues S 783.974 $ 1,300,536 -In creases maintenance abilities
Funding from Outside Sources S 3.250 $ 3,250 Pro\1des staffing to
Grant Funds (one time) 35,000 -In creases reporting I ADEQ BMP's
$ 822,224 1$ 1,303,786 1 -Develop a CIP program with projects
Additional Revenue $ 516,562 -Manage and In spect additional assets
Expenses: Retum at a later date> if there is support
Personnel for project implementation
3.8 Current Staff S 346,620 $ 358,752
New· Proposed
1.0 Asset Mgr.lEngineer 69,089
1.0 Stormwater P!1 . ...const. Mgr 83,982
5.8 Total Stormwater Staff 153,071
Total Personnel: $ ~ $ 511822
Contracts /Sei"\4ces Tasks· Outcomes
Outside Professional SeNces· 116,795 118,000 • Project Id entification
ONE TIME GRANT 35,000 ~ costing
Design/Consultants 50,000 10,000 -design
Stormwater Maintenance -OPS 134,000 139,000 -build/maint under 80K
Increase Maintenance (Services) 80.000 • Work order development
Vehicle Repair & Maintenance 19,800 21.000 -priori tization I maintenance scheduling
Equipment Repair & Maintenance 32,000 32,000 -increased inspections
Rentals 250 500 -increased Public Education
Telecommunications 1,400 2.800 • New Program Compliance
Postage 250 250 • Personnel/Operations cost
Printing & Binding 1,000 1,000 increase for deliwrables
Trawl & Training 5.000 10.000 • Program Sustainability
Membership 7,500 7,500 -5 years
Office Supplies 2,000 6.000
Gasoline 24,500 27,000 I Note: Program sustainabilityonly I
Uniforms 750 1.500 accounts for funds to p r eserve
Bad Debt Expense 750 750 activities defined above. Additional I Field Supplies 9,000 18,000 County or othe r external funds must
Safely 500 1.000 become available to pay far larger Software Maintenance & licensing 1,500 1,500 capital projects which w ill be SW Projects 50.000 50.000 identified. In the absence afCounty Depreciation 135,000 135,000 or otherextemal funds, the rate
662,800 1
structure will need tobe revised
Total Contracts/Services: $ 626,99!j $ again within one ortwo years or so
Capital Outlay/Projects that large cap ital projects identified
Minor Assets 2,500 3.500 by the new staff can be completed
Mise -Mos. Trapping 3,407 3,500 and funded by the Stormwater
Vehic leJEquipment Resel'\e 38,000 38,000 Utility.
New Vehicles 35,000
Capitallnteresl 305 305
Equipment 46.288 46,288
lTotal Capital OuOay $ 90,500 $ 126,593
Tota l Expenses: 1$ 1,064,1151 1$ 1,301 ,215 1
Ending Balance/Contingency Re serve 1$ 192.953 1 1$ 330,524 1
24.6% 25.4%
Five Year Projection Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
~/1 7 FY 17/18 -FY1 8/19 -FY19f20 FY 20/21
Balance $ 192,953 $ 330,524 $ 321 ,659 ~ 328,160 S 316,742
-----. -----------
-Revenuels 1,l03,7861 $ 1.325.867 $ 1,342,006 $ 1,353,831.73 $ 1,365 ,678
Personnel S 511 .822 $ 529,736 $ 548.277 $ 567,466 S 587,328
O&M :,; 523,800 '$ 529,038 '$ 534,328 '$ 539,672 '$ 545,068
Ops Main $ 139.000 ~ 143,865 S 148,900 S 154 ,112 S 159,506
------Capila' $ 126,593 S 132,093 $ 104,000 $ 04~_(J()O_ $ 119,000
-Expenditure S ---;:301;21 5--$--1,334,732 S 1,335,505 S 1,365.250 S 1,410.902
.2".iOCa .. ~.~~'.~".:'_~ _ 330,524 $ 321 ,659 $ 328, 160 $ ~1 ~,_4< S <7 1,018
Reserve Belance Pe rce nt
~---------_.--.. -·24.3% -----_.-25.4 % 24.5% 23.4 % 19.9% .. . . -... -. -..
--I Purchases $ -$ $ $ .. $ 50,000
YE Vehicle/Equipment Cash Balance $ 128,806 $ 170,306 $ 215,306 $ 260,306 $ 255,306
Ve Ie es/equrpment Truc k Truck Sweeper 'Usa Be gins
> Accounts {or depreciation
A-iii
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date 01-21-2016
Appendix D -Stormwater Utility Preferred Scenario Funding Chart
A-iv
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date: 01-21-2016
~"'.,. .'.. :\.
\ .. ~ }
~.>., ..
Town of Oro V alley
Stormwater Utili ty Divisio n
Fi scal Year FY 11/12
Revenue $ 792,987 $
Expe nses $ 788,247 $
Cash Balance $ 549,974 $
Required Cash Balance $ 1 18,948 $
2,500,000
2,000,000
1,500,000
FY 12/13
826,738
1,055,761
509,768
124 ,0 11
CHART 2 -Prop osed Rate Adjustment Fu ndi ng Ch art
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17118 FY 18/19 FY 19/20
$ 760,629 $ 77 1,888 $ 822,224 $ 1,303 ,786 $ 1,325,867 $ 1 ,342,006 $ 1,353 ,832
$ 913,564 $ 1,120,268 $ 1 ,064,115 $ 1,301,215 $ 1,334,732 $ 1 ,335,505 $ 1,365,250
$ 5 16 ,740 $ 299,844 $ 192,953 $ 330 ,524 $ 32 1,659 $ 328,160 $ 316,742
$ 11 4 ,094 $ 11 5,783 $ 123,334 $ 195,568 $ 198,880 $ 201,301 $ 203,07 5
STORMWATER UTILITY FUND
=.= Rev€.'nue =e= Fxpen;.e~ =e .-C~sh Rdldnce =4Ii= Rl"IlUlred Cilsh BiJliJnce
1,000,000 . .=-:---:-:/ . .-, L ~.
'>00,000 .--.... _::.;:.,
~.=; =;----I .~ ==~.~~.~~F=~
• • .. .
a
-500,000
fV 11/12 fV 12/13 fV 13/14 FV 14/1'> fV 15/16 fV 16/17 fV17/18 fV 18/19 FV 19/20 fV 20/21'
=.= Revenue $792,987 5826,738 $760,1,29 5771,888 $822,224 $1,303,786 $1,325,867 $1 ,342,006 $1.353,832 $1,365,678
=.= (xpens(>5 $788,247 :>1,055.761 $9B,5b4 $1,120,268 $1,064,115 $1,301,215 $1,334,732 $1,335,505 $1,365,250 $1,410,902 . C<l!>h Bal~nce $S49,974 $,09,768 $S16.740 $299,844 $192,953 $330,5,4 $31.1,659 $328,160 $316,742 5271518 =-= ReqUired C.-Ish Balance> $1l8,948 $124,011 5114,094 $.115,783 5123,33-1 $195,568 $198,880 $20.1 ,301 $203,075 5204,852
"FY 2020121 begin use of vehicle reserve for vehicle and eqUipment purchases. New rate adjustm ent accounts for depreciation .
F:12 D IV OPERATIONSISTORMWATERI1 COMM ISION RATE 2014_2015 REVEIWISTORMWATER FEE INCREASE FINAL RATE INCREASE -CHANGES PER PAUl
FY 20/21 -
$ 1,365,678
$ 1,410 ,9 02
$ 271,518
$ 204 ,852
Appendix E -Stormwater Listing
The list of issues on the following pages is a compilation of drainage and
Stormwater deficiencies that need to be evaluated , designed, programed or facilitated.
Some of these issues have been on a list since 2001 while other deficiencies have been
added as new washes and new assets have been identified and inventoried . This list is fluid
and as additional issues are brought to our attention concerns, complaints o r evaluation
requests are made from the community the list is modified.
Issues have been categorized as;
• Restoration
• Maintenance
• Study
• Design/Construction
At this time none of these issues have not been assessed nor is there fund ing for any type
of evaluation or mitigation. The ability to evaluate these issues will provide Once evaluated ,
the Town of Oro Valley will have a platform fo r requesting funding o r competing for funding
from outside sources to address some of these issues . THIS LIST IS NOT PRIORITIZED IN
ANY ORDER NOR DOES IT INDICATE THAT THE TOWN IS RESPONSIBLE FOR
EVALUATING OR MITIGATING T HE ISSUES . PRIVATE WASHES DO NOT FAL L UNDER
THE STORMWATER UTILITY PURVIEW.
A-v STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date ' 01-21-2016
Intentional Blank
,~ Town of Oro Valley
~ Stormwater Projects
The following Storm water Maintenance Projects are categorized by:
(5) . Maintenance Recurring -Sediment Removal & Cleaning (m aybe storm related)
(V) . Vegetation Removal. Recen tly Completed
(DC) .
(M)·
Drainage Design a nd Repair -Construction
Management Studies
No . Location/Name
OC-1 401 EStrada Patania
,·1 Canyon Shadow Wash
Subdivision
Tangerine Hills
Canada Hills
Parcel K
Canyon Shadow Wash (lambert to Rancho Fe li z
OC·2 COO) (442-647)
V·1 Canada Hills Parce l K
M·l Carmack Wa sh Basin
S·2 Carmack Wash
OC-3 Carmack Wash
OC-4 Highlands Wash
OC -5 Unknown Wash
S·3 Highlands Wash
OC-6 lambert lane
OC·7 lambert lane ICasas)
Canada Hills
Parcel K
Pima County is
performing the
study
Owne r Description of Work
OV
In sta ll flared end and reconnect end of culvert, rip rap Drainage Designs and Repairs -Construction
Remove sediment in ROW north of l am bert -excessive Sed im ent Removal-Maintenance
sediment due to Septembe r 8, 2015 storm.
Soi l cement wash bottom deteriorating at multiple
OV locations with large eros io n: also Repair conc rete inl et Drainage Designs and Repairs -Construction
wing wall on north side of lambert
OV
OV
Remove vegetation/debris in Canyon Shadows wash,
ROW north of l ambert
This basin that is comprised of numerous tributaries
that have a 100 year flow of over 3,000 cfs as they leave
the town boundaries. Th ese tributaries are causing
erosio n, sed im entation , and flooding problems at
numerous areas throughout the subdivisions they
traverse
Vegetation Removal -Maintenance
Management Study
Remove debris in ditches linda Vista from Oracle to Box d I '
cu lv erts excessive sediment. Se iment Remova M Mamtenance
PRI
Design drainage flow for linda Vista, Oracl e to Box
culverts, new design to have concrete bottom for
cleaning and sides ar mored for ero sion control
Design repair from Can Arches to COO, need 404 and
easements to control erosion -Oemo approx 1/2 of
exis ting outlet south of lambert lane and build to
correct outlet flow
PRI Conc rete wash repai r behind Fry's off of l a Canada
Remove debris in channel upstream and down st ream
PRI an d clean can arches excessive sediment due to
September 8,2015 sto rm .
OV Install short extension and flared Ends to all4 culverts
under lambert lane, East of l a Cho lla, place rip rap
An unnamed wash crosses lambert ro ad at a dip
crossing that causes significant flooding and sediment
Drainage Designs and Repairs -Construction
Drainage Designs and Repairs -Construction
Drainage Designs and Repairs -Construction
Sed im ent Removal · Maintenance
Drainage Des igns and Repairs -Cons tru ction
OV buildup at less than a 2 year storm event. In add iti on Drainage Designs and Repairs _ Construction
road edge erosion is affecting the structura l integrity of
the road. A box culvert project would alleviate this
problem a nd provide al l weather crossing.
CostType
One Time-
CIP
Recurring -
OP
Recurring
+4 yrs
Recurring -
OP
One Time-
CIP
Recurri ng -
OP
One Tim e-
CIP
One Tim e-
CIP
OneTime-
CIP
Recurring -
OP
One Ti me-
CIP
One Time-
CIP
Priority
2
(PR) • Pr ivate
Year Estimated Cost Funding
FY 2015 $
ann ual
FY 2014 $
annual
In
Progress
annual $
FY
FY $
FY
FY 2015 $
$
7,500 Pima County
5,000 Oro Valley -unfunde d
10,000
1st Year completed -
inspection in 2018
2,000 Oro Valley· unfunded
Pima County shou ld be 100,000 comp leting this study
7,000 Oro Valley -unfunded
30,000 Oro Valley -unfunded
600,000 Private -unfunded
80,000 Private -unfunded
30,000 Private -unfunded
25,000 Oro Valley -unfunded
Oro Va ll ey -unfunded.
600,000 PCFCO possible
1/12/2016 9:44 AM Page 1 F:\2 DIV OPERATlON5\STORMWATER\PROJECTS\Projects listing January 2016
;@ Town of Oro Valley
• "': I : Stormwater Projects
The following Stormwater Maintenance Projects are catego ri zed by:
(S) . Maintenance Recurring -Sed im ent Removal & Cleaning (maybe storm related) (DC) . Drainage Design and Repair -Construction (PR) • Private
(V)· Vegetation Removal. Recently Compl et ed (M) Management Stud ies
No. Location/Name Subdivision Owner Description of Work Cost Type Priority Year Estimated Cost Funding
Moore road currently has 3 dip crossings that become a
hazard annually during the monsoon season and must
be closed at a S year eve nt. The ro ad is a safety
One Time-800000 Oro Valley -unfunded. DC-8 Moore Road Box Culverts OV concern during and after eve ry rain event. This project Drainage Designs and Repairs -Construction $
will construct grade control structures and enhance the ClP , PCFCD possible
road structure with ribbon cu rbs to improve the safety
and reduce maintenance during rain events.
Saddle Clea n Culverts at Preakness/ Review Maintenance to HOA has drainage issues with in the subdivision
DC-5 6 Sad d le Va ll ey/Lo ga n's Cro ss ing Valley/Loga n 's PRI Gabion baskets in dipsection adjacent to Water Tank which need to be re-engineered by them -Cost OneTime annual $ 4,000 Oro Valley -unfunded
Cro ss ing TBD
DC-9 Mutterer's Wash Oro Valley OV Evaluate and redesign wash to improve water flow Drainage Designs and Repairs -Construction One Time -TBD Oro Valley -unfunded Townhomes while designing walking path along si de wash. CIP
V-2 Muttere r's Wash Oro Valley OV Remove vegetation/debris in wash Vegetation Removal -Maintenance Recurring -FY 2015 2,800 1st Year completed -
Townhomes +4yrs inspection in 2018
Add Rip Rap/Filter Fabric to south slope of Ball fields @ One Time -DC-10 Naranja Park Town Site OV S60'x 70' = 39,200 sq.ft. Find Alternative to Stabilize Drainage Designs and Repairs -Construction Oro Valley -unfunded
Slopes CIP
Design and build drainage structures to reduces One Time -DC-89 Naranja Park Town Site OV deterioration of "s lope/berm" along Monterra Hills road Drainage Designs and Repairs -Construction 1 100,000 Oro Valley -unfunded
impacting sidewalks. CIP
DC-11 Naranj a Ro ad @ Sa wtooth OV Shot create repair along hill side east of Sawtooth
Drainage Designs and Repairs -Construction
One Time -40,000 Oro Valley -unfunded within ROW CIP
New culverts at existing dip cro ssing to al low all
weather access during hazardous rain events . Th e all
Ironwood Hi gh weather crossings will pro vide access to Ironwood High One Time-1,700,000 Oro Valley: unfunded. 0(·12 Naranja Drainage Improvements OV School which is designated as an emergency Draina ge Designs and Repairs -Construction $ School ClP PCFCD pOSSible management contact location during local
emergencies. Th e improvements include nine 24" Rep ,
a 6 ceIl4'X10' culvert,
0(.13 Northern Avenue Drainage OV Comprehensive Drainage study and Construction of Drainage Designs and Repairs -Construction OneTime-$ 2,500,000 Oro Valley -unfunded
Improvements Culverts for all low water crossings on Northern . CIP
This project i nvolves studying the Peglar Wash Basin
(North of Magee Road between Northern Ave . & Oracle OneTime -
M-2 Peglar Wash Basin OV Road) within the Town of Oro Valley that is composed Management Study 2 75,000 Oro Valley -unfunded
of numerous tributaries that have a 100 year flow of CIP
over 1,500 cfs as they leave the town boundaries.
This project is to implement the recommendations from
DC-1 4 Peglar Wash Basin OV the Peglar's Wash Basin Mgt Study. This area primarily Drainage Designs and Repairs -Const ru ction OneTime -TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
deals with waters that travel through the Suffolk Hill's CIP
portions of the Town.
V·3 Roo ney W as h OV Complete yearly landscape work Rooney Wash Vegetation Removal · Maintenance Recurring -annual 60,000 Oro Valley -unfunded
OP
Shadow
Remove sediment in drainage easement behind homes Due to sto rm impact-S-4 Shado w M oun ta in Esta tes W est Mountain OV Sediment Removal -Maintenance
Recurring -FY 2015 S 7,500 excessive sediment due to Septembe r 8,2015 storm. OP PC outsoruced work Estates West
1/12/2016 9:44 AM Page 2 F:\2 DIV OPERATIONS\STORMWATER\PROJECTS\Projects Listing January 2016
,~. Town of Oro Va ll ey
~ Stormwater Projects
The following Stormwate r M aintenance Projects a re categorized by:
(S) . Maintenance Recurring -Se diment Removal & Cleani ng (maybe storm related)
(V) . Vegetat ion Removal. Rece nt ly Completed
(DC) .
(M)·
Drainage Design and Repair' Co nstruction
Management St udi es
No. Location/Name Subdivision Owner Desc ri ption of Work Cost Type Priority
DC·1S Shadow Mountain Estates West
V-4 Shadow Mountain Estates West
M-3 Un-named (Shannon) Basin
S·S Vista Del Oro Estates
V-5 Vista Del Oro Estates
M-4 Un-named Basin
STORM RELATED SM All PROJECTS
(-1 Newport Drive
C-2 Valle Del Oro
C·3 Atua
(-4 Lambert lane-Rancho Sonora
SR-l 9130 N Shadow Mnt
SR·2 10865 N. 1st Ave
SR-3 901 W . Valle De Oro
SR·' 321 W. Golf View
Shadow
Mountain
Estates West
Shadow
Mountain
Estates West
Vista Del Oro
Estates
Vista Del Oro
Estates
Oro Valley
Estates
Oro Valley
Estates
Oro Va ll ey
Estates
OV
OV
Design and repair alley drainage -erosion to area of
exposed gas lines
Shadow Mountain Estates vegetation removal in all ey
drainage ways
This project requi res st ud ying the area from Shannon road to
Th ornydale Road, from Tangerine Road to Naranja Road that
Drainage Designs and Repairs -Const ruction
Vegetation Removal -Maintenance
OV wou ld be use d fo r future Town Deve lopment/incorporation. Management Study
This is roug hl y 640 acres th at is compose d of numerous
tributaries.
Remove sedi ment Vista del Oro Estates exce ss iv e
se diment due to September 8, 2015 storm .
land scape in Vista Del Oro Es tates Wa sh
Thi s project requi res st udyin g the drainage areas that hold
future annexation pote ntia l for the Town of Oro Vallev. Th e
Sediment Removal-Maintenance
Vegetation Re mova l -Maintenance
study area would exte nd (south and west) from existing Management Study
Town limits to the boundaries of Orange Grove (to the south)
& Thornydaie (to the west).
Concrete drainage channel repair Chan nel -Maintenance
Concrete drainage channel repair Channel-Maintenance
Drop inlet add riprap repair erosion Channel-Maintenance
Reconstruct drop inlet Cha nnel-Ma intenance
Berm co nstruct ion -eva luate Storm Re lated Issue -Maintenance
Erosion control and stabilization -eval uat e Storm Re lated Issue -Maintenance
Erosion Con trol -eva lu ate Storm Related Iss ue -Maintenance
Erosion rep air, rip rap shoulder -evaluate Storm Re lated Issue -Maintenance
One Time -
CIP
Recu rrin g -
OP
One Time-
CIP
Recurring -
OP
Recu rr ing -
OP
One Time -
ClP
Recurring -
OP
Recu rrin g -
OP
Rec urring -
OP
Recurring -
OP
TBE
TBE
TBE
TBE
2
(PR) • Private
Yea r Estimated Cost Funding
20,000 Oro Valley -unfunded
89,000 Due to storm impact-
PC outsoruced work FY 2015 $
00 00 Oro Valley -unfunded.
1 , ° PCFCD possible
7,SOO Oro Valley -unfunded
S,OOO Oro Val l ey -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded.
PCFCD possible
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBO Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfund ed
TBO Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
1/12/2016 9:'4 AM Poge 3 F:\2 OiV OPERATlONS\STORMWATER\PROJECTS\Proj ects Listing Jan uary 2016
,~, Town of Oro Valley
~. Stormwater Projects
The following Stormwater Maintenance Projects are categorized by:
(5) . Maintenance Recurring -Sediment Removal & Cleaning (maybe storm related)
(V) . Vegetation Removal. Recently Completed
No. Location/Name
SR-S 180 E Catalina Shadows
SR-6 14255 N. Ave
SR-7 8980 N. Camino de An,a
SR-8 4 22 W. Hardy
SR-9 255 E. Newport
STORM RELATED ROAD CLOSURE -SAFETY
DC-IS Buena Vista north of Spring Valley
Dr.
Buena Vista south of Calle
OC-16
Concordia
OC-17 Calle Concord ia near Buena Vista
DC-18 Calle Loma Linda @ Calle Bonita
DC -19 Calle Solano wash area
DC -20 COO south of Riverfront Park
OC -21 Hardy Road, wash west of the
roundabout.
DC -22 Highlands Mobile Park
OC-23 La Cholla North of Glover
OC-24 La Cholla South of Casas Entrance
1/12/2016 9:44 AM
Subdivision Owner Description of Work
Berm construction to protect driveway " evaluate
Erosion mail box and ponding driveway · evaluate
Erosion at mail box -evalUate
Repair berm . evaluate
Erosion edge of pavement -evaluate
sediment cleanup> Road Closure -SAFETY
sedi ment cleanup> Road Closure -SAFETY
se diment cleanup> Road Closure · SAFETY
sediment cleanup> Road Closure · SAFETY
sediment cleanup> Road Closure· SAFETY
sediment cleanup> Road Closure -SAFETY
Road Closure -SAFETY sediment removal
se diment cleanup> Road Closure -SAFETY
Road Closure -SAFETY sediment removal
Road Closure -SAFETY sediment removal
(DC) .
(M)'
Drainage Design and Repair ~ Construction
Management Studies
CostType Priority
Storm Related Issue -Maintena nc e TBE
Storm Related Issue -Maintenance TBE
Storm Related Issue -Maintenance TBE
Storm Related Issue -Maintenance TBE
Storm Related Issue -Maintenance TBE
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time -
all weather road and el im inate road closure due CIP
to se diment -improving safety
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time -
all weathe r road and eliminate road closure due ClP
to sediment -improving safety
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time-
all weather road and eliminate road closure due CIP
to sedi ment -improving safety
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time -
al l weather road and eliminate road closure due CIP
to sediment -improving safety
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time _
al l weather road and eliminate road closure due CIP
to sediment -improving safety
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time _
all weather road and eliminate road closure due CIP
to sediment -improving safety
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time.
al l weather road and eliminate road closure due CIP
to sediment -improving safety
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time _
all weather road and eliminate road closure due CIP
to sediment -improving safety
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time -
al l weather road and eliminate road clos ure due CIP
to sediment -improving sa fety
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time-
all weather road and eliminate road closure due CIP
to se diment -improving safety
(PR) • Private
Year Estimated Cost Funding
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
Page 4 F:\2 DIV OPERATlONS\STORMWATER\PROJECTS\Projects listing January 2016
,~ Town of Oro Valley
:~.' Stormwater Projects
The following Stormwater Ma intenance Project s are catego ri zed by:
(S) . Maintenance Recurring -Sed iment Removal & Cleaning (maybe sto rm rela t ed)
(V) . Vegetation Re moval. Recently Complet ed
No. Location/Name
OC -25 La Cholla South of Lambert
OC-2 6 La Cholla South of Naranja
OC-2 7 Lambert east of La Cholla
OC-28 Lambert Lane west of La Cholla
OC-29 Landoran Ln
Subdivision
Oro Va l ley
Estates
~C-3D Limewood East of Camino Del Plata Lime wood
OC-3 1 Linda Vista near Egle ston Vista Mont ana
OC-32 Lom as De Oro at Lambert
OC-33 Moore East of La Cho lla
DC-34 Moore east of La Cho ll a
OC-3 5 Naranja @ Ironwood Ridge HS
OC -36 Naranja East of Shannon
OC-3 7 Nara nja West of La Cho lla near HS
OC-38 Northern Ave beh ind Walmart
OC-39 Northern Ave north of Cool
1/12/20 16 9:44 AM
Owner Description of Work
Road Closure -SAFETY sediment removal
Road Closure · SAFETY sediment removal
Road Clos ure -SAFE TY sediment removal
sediment cleanup > Roa d Closure -SAFETY
sedim ent cle anup> Road Closure -SAFETY
sedim ent cl eanup> Road Closure -SAFETY
se diment clea nu p > Road Closure -SAFETY
sediment cl eanup > Road Closu re -SAFETY
Ro ad Clo sure · SAFETY sediment removal
Road Closure -SA FETY sedi ment removal
Road Closure -SAFETY sediment removal
Road Closure · SAFETY sediment removal
Road Closure -SA FETY sedime nt removal
sediment cleanup > Road Closure -SAFETY
se diment cleanup > Road Closure -SAFETY
(DC) .
(M)·
Drainage Design and Repair· Construction
Management Studies
Cost Typ e
Engineer, design and co nstruct to make road and One Time -
all weather road and elim inate road closure due CI P to sediment -improving safety
Engineer, design and construct to make road and .
all weather road and eliminat e road closu re due On e Tlme -
to sedi ment -improving safety CIP
Engineer, design and co nst ruct to make road and .
d . . d One Tim e -all w ea ther road an el iminate roa clo su re du e IP
to sediment _ improving sa f ety C
Engineer, design an d cons t r uct t o make road and . . One Tlme -
all weath er ro ad and eliminate road closure due C
to se diment -improving sa f ety IP
Engineer, design and co nstruct to make road and .
all weather road and eli minate ro ad clos ure due One Time -
to sedi ment -improving safety CIP
Engineer, de sig n and const ruct to make road and .
all weather road an d el im inate road closure due One Ti me -
to sediment -improving safety Cl P
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time -
all weathe r road and elimi nate road closure due
to se diment _ improving sa fe ty CI P
Engineer, desig n and const ruct to make road and .
al l weathe r road and eli minate road clos ure due One Tlme -
to sedi ment -improving safety CI P
Engi neer, design and co nstruc t to make road and One Tim e-all weather road and el im inate road closure due
to se diment - i mprovi ng sa fety
CIP
Enginee r, design and c~nstruct to make ro ad and On e Time -
all weather road and ehminate road closure due CIP
to sedime nt -improving safety
Engineer, des ig n and construct to make road and One Time _
all weather road and eh mlnate road closure due CIP
to sedi ment -Imp rOV ing safety
Enginee r, design and co nstr uct to make road and On e Time-
all weather road and eliminate road closu re due
to se diment -improving sa f ety
CIP
Engineer, design an d construct t o make road and One Ti me -
al l weathe r road and eliminate road closure due CIP
to sediment -improving safety
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time _
all weather road and elim inate road clos ure due CIP
to sedi ment · improving sa fety
Engineer, design and cons truct to ma ke road and One Time -
all weather road and e hm inate roa d closu re due CIP
to sediment -Improving safety
(PR) • Private
Pri o rity Yea r Estimated Cost Funding
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Va ll ey -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Vall ey -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Va ll ey -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -un funded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfu nded
TBD Oro Val ley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
Page 5 F:\2 DIV OPERA Tl DNS\STORMWAT ER\PROJ ECTS\Project s listing January 2016
,~. Town of Oro Valley
~f Stormwater Pr ojects
The following Stormwater Maintenance Projects are categorized by:
(S) . Maintenance Recurring -Sed iment Removal & Cleaning (maybe storm related)
(V) . Vegetation Removal. Recently Comp leted
No. Location/Name
OC·40
Northern Ave so uth of camino
cortaro
DC ·41 Northern Ave sou th of Magee
DC·42 Overlook sou th of Calle Concordia
DC ·43 Pistachio @ culverts
DC ·44 Pistachio @ Pomegranate
DC-4S Rancho Sonora Dr
DC-46 Shannon South of Naranja
DC.47 Shannon to stop traffic from
crossi ng the was h at the north end.
DC·48 Suffolk Dr @ Village
DC·49 Tangerine -by Camino Del Plata
Subdivision
Tangerin Rd
construction FY
2016
Tangerin Rd
DC-SO Tangerine -one at town boundary construction FY
2016
DC·S1 Tangerine @ Camino Del Plata
DC -52 Tangerine and area between La
Cholla and La Canada.
DC-53 Tangerine West of La Cholla
DC-54 Valle Del Oro RD
1/12/2016 9:44 AM
Tangerin Rd
construction FY
2016
Tange rin Rd
construction FY
2016
Tangerin Rd
construction FY
2016
Owner Description of Work
sedi men t cleanup> Road Closure -SAFETY
sed iment cleanup> Road Closure -SAFETY
sed im ent cleanup> Road Closure -SAFETY
se dim ent cleanup> Road Closure -SAFETY
sediment cleanup> Road Closure -SAFETY
se dim ent cleanup> Road Closure -SAFETY
sed im ent cleanup> Road Closure -SAFETY
sed iment cle anu p > Road Closure -SAFETY
sedi ment cleanup> Road Closu re -SAFETY
Road Closure -SAFETY sedime nt removal
Road Closure -SAFETY se diment removal
Road Closure -SAFETY sediment removal
Road Closu re ~ SAFETY sediment removal
Road Closure ~ SAFETY sediment removal
sediment cleanup> Road Closure -SAFETY
(DC) . Drainage Design and Repair -Construction (PR) -Private
(M)' Management Studies
Cost Type Prio rity Yea r Estimated Cost Funding
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time -
all weather road and eliminate road closure due
to sediment -improving safety CIP
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time _
all weather road and eliminate road closure due CIP TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
to sediment -imprOVing safety
Enginee r, design and construct to make road and One Time _
all weather road and eliminate road closure due CIP TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
to sediment -Improvmg safety
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time _
al l weather road and eliminate road closure due CIP TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
to sed iment -Improving safety
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time _
all weather road and eliminate road closure due ClP TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
to sediment -Improving safety
Engineer, design and construct to make road and OneTime -all weather road and eliminate road closure due TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
to sediment -improving safety CIP
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time -
all weather road and .el iminate road closure due CIP TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
to sediment -Improving safety
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time-
all weather road and .e liminate road closure due CIP TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
to se diment -Improving safety
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time-
all weather road and eliminate road closure due CIP TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
to sediment -improving safety
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time-RTA/PAG funded-all weather road and eliminate road closure due CIP ongoing In project cost Tangerine Rd Project to sediment -improving safety
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time _ RTA/PAG funded -all weather road and eliminate road closure due CIP ongoing jn project cost
Tange ri ne Rd Project to sediment -Improving safety
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time-RTA/PAG funded-all weather road and eliminate road closure due CIP ongoing In project cost
Tangerine Rd Project to sediment -improving safety
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time -RTA/PAG funded -all weather road and eliminate road closure due CIP ong oing In project cost
Tangerine Rd Project to sediment -improving safety
Engineer, design and cons t ruct to make road and One Time _ RTA/PAG funded-all weather road and eliminate road closure due CIP ongo ing In project cost
Tangerine Rd Project to sediment -Improving safety
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time _
Oro Valley -unfunded all weather road and eliminate road closure due CIP TBD
to sediment -improving safety
Page 6 F:\2 DIV DPERATlONS\STORMWATER\PROJECTS\Projects Listing January 2016
,~, Town of Oro Valley
~ Stormwater Projects
The following Stormwater Maintenance Projects are categorized by:
(5) . Maintenance Recurring -Sediment Removal & Cleaning (maybe storm related)
(V) . Vegetation Removal. Recently Comp leted
No . Location/Name
DC-55 Valle Del Oro Rd at CC
~C -56 La Cholla @ Tangerine
DC -58 8151 Northern Ave .
DC -50 8252 N Northern Ave.
OC-61 Casas Lindas Apts
OC-62 2005 W Glover Rd
OC-63 Bridge on Monterra Vista Dr.
DC -67 Naranja Dr.
OC-69 60S E Windy Peak
OC -71 363 E Sunburst -Pau l Parisi
OC-73 Oracle Square @ Hardy
OC-76 Oracle Rd. Drainage N' of Calle
Conco rdi a
DC-79 Rock Ridge Apts
DC-81 Rivers Edge 5'
OC-83 Rivers Edge N'
Subdivision
La Cholla
Northern Av e.
Northern Ave.
Northern Ave .
Ironwood
Ranch
Monterra Knolls
Canada Ridge
Rancho Catalina
Rancho Catalina
Shadow
Mountain
Estates
Vista Mantana
Pu sc h View
lane
Rivers Edge (1 -
89)
Rivers Edge
(103-120)
Owner Desc ription of Work
sed iment cleanup> Road Closure -SAFETY
Sediment removal from drop inlet culvert
Debris removal from outlet
Debris removal from inlets
Debris removal from inlet in ROW
Oebri s/Veg /Sediment Removal from outlet of box culvert
and manage downstream veg
Debris/Veg /Sediment Removal from outlet of box culvert
and manage downst ream veg
Box Culvert in ROW west of Eagle Crest Or.· inlet /outlet
need debris/veg removal
Drainage improvements
Veg remova l and Channelization of wash running across
Rancho Catalina Ave between 455 E Windy Vista PI. and 8405
N Rancho Catalina Dr.
Drainage improvements
Drainage improvements -channelization of sheetflow onto
Egleston contributing to flooding in Vista Mantan a
Su bdivi sio n
Drainage channell on S' sid e of Pusch View Lane Needs Veg
cleanup/debris removal
PRI Drainage Channel outlet to COO needs Veg Mgmt
Box Culvert crossing Lambert needs sediment removed
(DC) .
(M)
Drainage Design and Repair -Construction
Management Studies
Cost Ty pe
Engineer, design and cons truct to make road and One Time _
ali weather road and eliminate road closu re due
to sediment -improving safety
Add Berm and waddles to slow and
control/direct flow into the in let
Sto rm Drain under Northern b locked by
Veg/debris/5ediment at outlet
Storm Drain under Northern blocked by
Veg/debris/Sediment at inlet
Northern blocked by Veg/debris/Sediment at
inlet
Po ssi ble Detention Project -Engineer/Design
Discuss Easement behind lots from 625 E Windy
Peak Dr -8530 N Ranch Catalina with possible
detention project. AI Coons
Dra ina ge Study -900 cfs Coming across Oracle
thru box cu lvert into Shadow Mountain Estates
Drainage Study/Temporary Solutions
ROW
Private
CIP
Priority
(PR) • Private
Yea r Estimated Cost Funding
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
annua l 1,500 Oro Valley -unfunded
annual 500 Oro Valley -unfunded
annual 1,500 Oro Valley -unfunded
annua l 1,500 Oro Valley -unfunded
annual 2,500 Oro Valley -unfunded
annual 3,000 Oro Valley -unfunded
annual 2,000 Oro Valley -unfunded
10,000 Oro Valley -unfunded
7,500 Oro Valley -unfunded
10,000 Oro Valley -unfunded
30,000 Oro Valley -unfunded
annu al 1,500 Oro Valley -unfunded
Private Private -unfunded
annual 4,500 Oro Valley -unfunded
1/12/2016 9:44 AM Page 7 F:\2 DIV OPERATlON5\5TORMWATER\PROJECTS\Projects Li sting January 2016
,~, Town of Oro Valley
~ Stormwater Projects
The following Stormwater Maintenance Projects are catego ri zed by:
(S) . Maintenance Recurring -Sedi m ent Removal & Cleaning (m aybe sto rm related)
(V) . Vegetation Removal. Recently Completed
(DC) .
(M)·
Drainage Design and Repair -Construction
Management Studies
No . Location/Name
OC -84 Vista Catalina
DC-57 8305 Northern Ave.
DC-59 8090/8041 Northern Ave.
DC-65 Ironwood Valley Dr.
0(-68 Naranja Dr .
DC-7o 8620 N Glenhurst PI.
DC-75 Oracle Rd. Drai nage N' of Ca ll e
Concord ia
DC-8o Rooney Wash
DC-85 10707 N Pomegranite Dr.
Subd ivi sion
Vista Catalina
Northern Ave .
Northern Ave .
Tangerine
Heights
Canada Ridge
Sun nyslope
OV Aquatic
Center
Oracle Road E'
side
Monte Del Oro
DC-54 Tangerine Road @ Highlands Wash Monterra Knolls
(east of Monterra Knolls)
DC-66 Reflection Ridge Dr
DC-72 Campo Bello
DC-74 Oracle Rd. Drainage S' of Calle
Concordia
OC -77 Oracle Rd . Drain age N' of EI
Conquistador Way
OC-78 Valle Del Oro Town Homes
DC-82 Rivers Edge N'
Tange rine
Heights
Campo Bello
Shadow
Mountain
Estates
Mutterers Wash
S'
Mutterers Wash
S'
Pusch Ridge
Vistas II
Owner Description of Work
Channel Nt of Vista Catalina/S' of Highland s Mobile Park
requires veg/debris/sediment removal
Debris removal from outlet/Cannot find inlet
DebriS removal from inlets/ou tl ets
Box Culvert -manage erosion cutting rrom road down sides
of box culvert
Box Culvert in ROW east of Canada Ridge Dr . -outlet need
debris/veg removal
Draina ge improvements
Drainage Improvements
Drainage channel on E' side of Oracle Rd. Needs Veg
cleanup/debris removal at inlet
Drainage requires refinement
DebrisNeg /Sediment Removal from Inlet/outlet of box
culvert and manage downstream veg
Storm Drain under Northern blocked by
Veg/debris/Sediment at outlet
Sto r m Drain under Northern blocked by
Veg/debris/Sed lment at outlet
need to engineer permanent so lution
Changes in Federal land to the east -altering
flows to t he west
Drainage Study
ROW /ADOn
ROW erosion at entry rrom Tangerine and north along W'side Contact Water to discuss eros ion around box
ROW
Drainage improvements Drainage Study
Drainage imp rovements Drainage Study
Drainage from Wolfley/Ajacent Property add in g to sediment Discus s with property owners need for eros ion
Problem into Mutterers. Deep Erosion cuts next to spillway I
on EI Conquistador Way (Private Property) contro
Drai na ge Channell exiting Va ll e Del Oro town hom es needs to Discuss with property owners need for eros ion
be cleaned".Veg/Debris/Sedlmet control
Hillside at 10831 N Pusch Ridge View PI. Needs Erosion
Control Pus ch Ridge Vistas II HOA
CostType
(PR) • Private
Priority Year Estimated Cost Fu nding
TBD 10,000 Oro Valley -unfunded
annual 500 Oro Valley -unfunded
annual 1,500 Oro Valley -unfunded
annual SOO Oro Valley -unfunded
annual 1,500 Oro Valley -unfunded
TSD Oro Valley -unfunded
3,000 Oro Valley -unfunded
annual 1,500 Oro Valley -unfunded
1,000 Oro Va ll ey -unfu nded
annual 5,000 Oro Valley -unfunded
500 Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
1,500 Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
Privat e Oro Valley -u nfunded
Private Oro Valley -unfunded
1/12/2016 9:44 AM PageS F:\2 DIV OPERATlONS\STORMWATER\PROJECTS\Projects listing January 2016
~, Town of Oro Valley
~ Stormwater Projects
The following Stormwater Maintenance Projects are categorized by:
(S) . Maintenance Recurring -Sediment Removal & Cleaning (maybe storm related)
(V) . Vegetation Removal. Recently Completed
No. location/Name
OC -86 1001 E Linda Vista Blvd
OC-87 Rancho Sonora Dr
DC-88 Shadows of the Ridge
1/12/2016 9:44 AM
Subdivision
Pusch Ridge
Estates
Rancho Sonora
Shadows of the
Ridge
Owner Description of Work
Sweep Road in front of house
Trash in Wash up against ba rracades
Sediment removal from drop inl et cu lvert
Page 9
(DC) .
(M)
Drainage Design and Repair -Construction
Management Studies
CostType Priority
(PR) • Private
Year Estimated Cost Funding
ISO Oro Valley -unfunded
150 Oro Valley -unfunded
2,500 Oro Valley -unfunded
F:\2 DIV OPERATlONS\STORMWATER\PROJECT5\Projects Listing January 2016
Appendix F -Western Kentucky University
Western Kentucky University What other are doing.
Stormwater Utility Survey Summary
2014
Average Lowest Hi ghest
Cities, Towns, Counties Fee Fee Fee
Total US Stormwater Ut il ities 1511 $ 4.01 $ $ 35.00
Fee Range No .
No Fee 264 17.5%
.01 to 1.49 96 6.4%
1.50 to 2.49 137 9.1%
2.50 to 2.99 160 10.6% 43.5% Town of Oro Valley
3.00to 3.49 81 5.4%
3.50 to 3.99 99 6.6% Ipossible Rates -Residetial
4.00 to 4.99 206 13.6% Rates FY 15/16 Increase Funds
5.00 to 5.99 136 9.0% 34.5% $ 2.90 $ 783,974
6.00 t o 6.99 97 6.4% $ 3.63 $ 981,320 25.0%
7.00 to 7.99 79 5.2% $ 4.35 $ 1,175,962 SO.O"..6 $ 391,988
8.00 to 8.99 46 3.0"..6 $ 5.80 $ 1,567,949 100.0"..6 $ 783,975
9.00 to 9 .99 29 1.9% 16.6% $ 7.25 $ 1,959,936 150.0"..6 $ 1,175,962
10.00 to 14.99 61 4 .0%
15.00 to 35.00 20 1.3% 5.4%
1511 100.0% 100.0"..6
Population Average High
~ 10,000 477 31.6% $ 3.71 $ 19.43
~25,000 388 25.7% $ 4.15 $ 14.00
~50,000 256 16.9% $ 4.26 $ 14.46 Town of Oro Valley
~7S,000 105 6.9% 81 .1% $ 3.93 $ 11.99
~ 100,000 67 4.4% $ 3 .71 $ 13 .05
~ 150,000 58 3.8% $ 3.94 $ 14.26
~250,000 59 3.9% $ 4.31 $ 14.00
~500,000 52 3.4% 15.6% $ 4.01 $ 13.78
~ 1,000,000 34 2.3% $ 4.34 $ 16.75
> 1,000,000 15 1.0% 3.2% $ 2.72 $ 13.48
1511 100.0% 100.0%
ERU Classifications
<1000 18 1.2%
< 1250 26 1.7%
<2000 64 4 .2%
<2500 112 7.4% 14.6%
<2600 69 4 .6%
< 2750 68 4.5%
<3000 82 5.4%
<3250 125 8.3% 22 .8%
<4000 122 8.1%
<5000 52 3.4% 11.5%
5OOO~9000 26 1.7% Town of Oro Valley
9001 ~ 25000 10 0.7%
> 43500 35 2.3%
Uns£!ec ified 702 46.5% 51.2 %
1511 100.0% 100.0%
A-vi
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date 01-21-2016
Appendix G -Equivalent Residential Unit Study
A-vi i
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date" 01-21-2016
Development and Infrastructure Services Department
Operations -Stormwater Utility
Re: Determining the basic ERU value
September 2, 2015
This memo describes the steps taken to date in the determination of an Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU)
which will be applied to the determination of a revised Stormwater Utility fee structure. The use of
available GIS data files in the determination of a revised ERU are discussed. Two GIS data files were used in
the process, the first of which is a residential structure footprints file. The footprints file is a GIS data layer
with file name [sde.5DE .Residentialfootprintj (footprints) which is located in the Town GIS repository . This
file was generated by the Pima Association of Governments (PAG) using existing aerial photograph raster
data . The footprint data is in the form of polygons which show the approximate footprint of nearly all the
residential and some commercial structures in the Town . Any misSing residential data would mostly be
structures that did not exist at the time the data was prepared. The footprint data is intended to loosely
represent the impervious areas within residential parcels. While the data contains essentially a complete
set of all the residential structures, the actual impervious areas of each parcel are larger than what is
indicated by the areas measured for the footprints file since the footprints file does not always include
pavement areas, outside concrete areas etc ... within each residential parcel. The data does, however,
provide a consistent and complete source of information to use for our purposes. The second GIS data file
used in this process represents the zoning in the Town with file name [sde.SDE.Zoningj . This data is also in
the form of polygons with each polygon representing the specific zoning within its area.
Statistics for each zoning category were extracted by first ove r laying the footprints file with the zoning file
therefore isolating footprint sizes for each zoning d istrict. The critical statistics were: 1) number of
footprints within a particular zoning district and 2) the mean size of the footprints in that district . Footprint
data for twelve zoning categories were observed (see Table 1). Please see the attached (Figure 1) for a
distribution of Oro Valley zoning overlaid on the residential footprints within the Town.
Table 1. Oro Valley Zoning Districts with Selected Statistics
Zoning Description Count Mean Footprint Size
Category (sq-ft)
PAD Planned Area Development 10,977 2752
R-4 Townhouse Residential 2,048 2461
R-6 Multi-Family Residential 198 1949
R1-300 Single Family Residential 0.15 RAe 99 529 Z
R1-14~ Single Family Residential 0.30 RAe 416 3826
R1-431 Single Family Residential 1.00 RAe 449 3808
R1-36 Single Family Residential 1.20 RAe 1,563 3494
R1-20, Single Family Residential 2.00 RAG 350 4400
R1-~ Single Family Residential 5.00 RAe 645 3183
SDH -6 Site Delivered Hous ing District 281 1861
T-P Technology Park 84 2181
C-1 Commercial 31 26,103
Note: The above data does not represent a complete list of all zoning districts and the Count values may be slightly higher for the
di stricts that are shown . Thi s calculation is a "first pass" intended to get a reasonable approximation of the statistics .
From the data identified in Table 1 all statistics for single family residential were used i n the determ i nation
of an ERU value . Single family residential was used since it comprised the majority of the overa ll residential
structures within the Town and it is typically used in the available literature when using ERU as a method of
calculating stormwater fees . The ERU was calculated as the Count weighted average of the mean footprint
sizes . The formula for calculat ing the ERU was as follows :
(Mean Footpri nt Size Rl -300 X CountRl-300 ) + (Mean Footp ri nt Size Rl-144 X Count Rl-144 ) + ...
(CountRl -3oo + CountRl -144 + ... J
The result for this calculation is 3701.218 indica t ing a rounded ERU value of 3700 . The current ERU fo r the
Town is 5000. This method provides a consistent and measurab le way to calculate the basic ERU .
Prepare d by:
Fritz F. Laos, E IT , CF M
Civi l En gi neer
Town of Oro Va ll ey Stormwate r Utility
" '"
I ;~ •• . -"::
'"
...
Town of Oro Valley
(00"9 fo1 ov· ~·.t •. our (ommvIItry. OUI lutu'l:
N
o •
Legend
ZONE
• e.,
.e.2
.e.N
• PAD
.PSC
.R-4
.R-4R
.R.o
R·S
R1-10
.Rl .144
D R1.20
• Rl·JOO
.Rl.36
.R'-43
D R1.7
.R1-72
.SDH.o .T.P
e'
W E . .
s
This map displays mainly res i dential
structure footprints and selected
businesses within the Town of Oro Valley.
Residential footpri nts were obtained using
existing aerial photos from Pima County GIS
database.
The Legend here is mainly to demonstrate
the actual number of zoning districts it being
difficult color mappping one-to-one on the map .
Figure 1
Residential Structure Footprints
overlaid on
Oro Valey Zoning Districts
0.5
Miles
':52.800 By:FFL
Oale:09I01I15
Ooc.umenl Palh. F .\2 OIV OPERATIONS\sTORM'IIATER\FRIl75 OIRECTORIESV'Fl R&glonal FloodpiainlMap$\lmpI'V$_St1cs\lmprvs_srlu.mxd
Bibliography
Campbell, C. WalTen (2011). Western Kentucky University 2011 Stonnwater Utility Survey,
Western Kentucky University , Bowling Green, 51 pp.
Town Council Regular Session Item # 5.
Meeting Date:03/02/2016
Requested by: Aimee Ramsey
Submitted By:Aimee Ramsey, Development Infrastructure Services
Department:Development Infrastructure Services
Information
SUBJECT:
RESOLUTION NO. (R)16-12, PROVIDING NOTICE OF INTENT TO INCREASE
STORMWATER UTILITY BASE RATE FOR THE ORO VALLEY STORMWATER
UTILITY
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Pursuant to A.R.S. § 9-511.01, a municipality must adopt a Notice of Intent to increase
rates at least 30 days prior to the public hearing. The Notice of Intent does not increase
any of the rates. The consideration of adoption of any rate increases will occur at the
public hearing.
The attached resolution (Attachment #1) meets the intent of the statute by:
Making a copy of the Stormwater Rates Analysis Report (Attachment #2) available
for public review by placing the report in the Town Clerk's office and on the
Stormwater Utility's webpage
1.
Directing the town clerk to advertise the resolution in a newspaper of general
circulation at least 20 days prior to the public hearing
2.
Establishing a public hearing date for May 4, 20163.
This resolution sets in motion the public process by scheduling the public hearing and
publishing the report. The Stormwater Utility Rate Analysis Report may be obtained at
the Town Clerk's Office or on the Stormwater Utility webpage. Once the Notice of Intent
is approved and the report is published, the amount of the proposed Stormwater rate
increase that could be adopted at the public hearing cannot exceed the amounts
published in the report.
The proposal would increase the current Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU) from $2.90
per ERU to $4.50 per ERU.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
The Town Code 15-24-13 Section H clearly states the following as guidelines for the
Base Rate for the Stormwater Utility;
The Town Council shall, by resolution, establish the annual (fiscal year) monthly
base rate for the Stormwater Utility fee. The base rate shall be calculated to ensure
adequate revenues to fund the costs of stormwater management and to provide for
the operation, maintenance, and capital improvements of the stormwater system in
the Town.
1.
The Stormwater Utility Commission shall annually review the Stormwater Utility
revenue requirements and recommend to the Town Council rate adjustments as
necessary.
2.
Based on work accomplished over the past 1 1/2 years by the Stormwater Utility
Commission, and upon review of the current rate, it has been determined that the
current rate will be insufficient to cover the costs of stormwater management and to
provide for the operation, maintenance, and capital improvements of the stormwater
system in the Town to meet minimum State storm water management criteria. The
Stormwater Utility has produced a Stormwater Rate Increase Analysis due to the fact
that the projected FY 2017 budget depicts an ending cash balance of the fund less than
the 15% required by code.
Pursuant to A.R.S. § 9-499.15 Section B.2: If the municipality proposes to increase the
rate of an existing tax or fee on a business, it is required to provide written notice of the
proposed increase on the home page of the municipality's website at least sixty days
prior to the date the proposed new rate is approved or disapproved by the governing
body of the municipality.
The Stormwater Utility staff reviewed rates to determine the base rate required to meet
the cost of the Stormwater management program. A resolution providing for a Notice of
Intent to increase the current Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU) from $2.90 per ERU to
$4.50 per ERU is attached. This resolution meets statutory requirements and sets in
motion the public process by scheduling the public hearing on May 4, 2016, publishing
the Notice of Intent and making the Stormwater Rates Analysis Report available for
public review.
The Notice of Intent does not authorize any rate increases. If the resolution for the
Notice of Intent is approved, a separate resolution decreasing the ERU will be presented
to the Town Council for consideration at the public hearing on May 4, 2016. The
Stormwater Rates Analysis Report will be available at the Town Clerk's Office or on the
Stormwater Utility webpage. Once the Notice of Intent is approved and the report is
published, the change in ERU that could be adopted at the public hearing cannot vary
from the published reduction in the report.
The Stormwater Utility Commission evaluated staff recommendations based on a water
rates analysis to assure the recommendations meet Town policies. On January 21,
2016, the Commission voted to recommend approval of the Preferred Financial Scenario
in the Stormwater Rates Analysis Report.
The Stormwater Rates Analysis Report includes projections for five years; however,
Stormwater rates will be reviewed annually and only for the first year in the five year
projection period. The Preferred Financial Scenario meets all revenue requirements and
cash reserve requirements for the Stormwater Utility.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact associated with adopting a Notice of Intent to increase water
rates. However, if the resolution is approved, the proposed Stormwater Utility base rate
increase to ERU will be presented to the Town Council for their consideration at the
public hearing on May 4, 2016. The financial impacts of the proposed Stormwater ERU
base rate increase to the Utility are detailed in Appendix C of the Stormwater Utility Rate
Analysis.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to (approve or deny) Resolution No. (R)16-12, providing Notice of Intent to
increase the base rate to Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU) value for the Oro Valley
Stormwater Utility.
Attachments
(R)16-12 Providing Notice of Intent to Increase Rates
Stormwater Rates Analysis Report
RESOLUTION NO. (R)16-12
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, PROVIDING NOTICE OF
INTENT TO INCREASE THE STORMWATER UTILITY BASE
RATE
WHEREAS, pursuant to A.R.S. 9-511, et seq., the Town has the requisite statutory
authority to acquire, own and maintain a stormwater utility for the benefit of the
landowners within and without the Town’s corporate boundaries; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to A.R.S. § 9-511, et seq.,the Town is required to give a Notice of
Intent at a regular Town Council meeting to increase Stormwater rates, fees and charges;
and
WHEREAS, on November 7, 2007, the Council adopted Resolution No. (R) 07-127,
establishing the base rate for the Stormwater Utility fee; and
WHEREAS, the Town has completed a Stormwater Rates Analysis Report, attached
hereto as Exhibit “A”, which supports increasing the base rate for the Oro Valley
Stormwater Utility; and
WHEREAS,not less than twenty (20) days prior to the public hearing on the proposed
rate increases, the Town shall cause to be published one time in a newspaper of general
circulation within the Town’s boundaries, a Notice of Intent showing the date, time and
place of the hearing.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE MAYOR AND TOWN
COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA:
1. This Resolution serves as the Notice of Intent, which is hereby publicly given, for
the Town of Oro Valley to increase the base rate of the Oro Valley Stormwater
Utility.
2. A public hearing shall be held at the regular meeting of the Mayor and Council at
6:00 p.m. on May 4, 2016, in the Council Chambers of the Town Hall, Town of
Oro Valley, 11000 North La Cañada Drive, Oro Valley, Arizona, to deliberate and
vote on the proposed increases.
3. Exhibit “A”, attached hereto, be made available to the public in the Office of the
Town Clerk and on the Town of Oro Valley Stormwater Utility website for
review prior to the public hearing.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley,
Arizona this 2
nd day of March, 2016.
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
Dr. Satish I. Hiremath, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie K. Bower, Town Clerk Tobin Sidles, Legal Services Director
Date: Date:
EXHIBIT “A”
DATE: 01-21-2016
STORMWATER UTILITY -DEVELOPMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY I 11000 N La Canada Drive, Oro Valley, AZ 85737
Stormwater Utility Mission
To provide safe and efficient management of the Stormwater Utility, promote and
protect life and safety, water quality, and the Town's working and natural environments
before, during , and after the occurrence of storm events in accordance with all Town
codes , standards and policies.
ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL
Dr. Satish I. Hiremath, Mayor
Lou Waters, Vice Mayor
Brendan Burns, Council Member
William Garner, Council Member
Joe Hornat, Council Member
Mary Snider, Council Member
Mike Zinkin, Council Member
ORO VALLEY STORMWATER UTILITY COMMISSION
David Parker, Chair
Michael Stankiewicz, Vice Chair
Jim Mikolaitis, Commissioner
John Lynch, Commissioner
Frederick Wayand, Commissioner
TOWN STAFF
Greg Caton, Town Manager
Stacey Lemos, Finance Director
Paul Keesler P.E., Director
Aimee Ramsey, Assistant Director
Phil Trenary, Operations Manager
Michael Todnem P.E., Stormwater Sr. Civil Engineer
Page 11
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYS IS I Date " 01-21-2016
Table of Contents
PART I. Executive Summary ................................................................................................. 3
PART II. Program Information and Background .................................................................... 6
Stormwater Infrastructure ................................................................................................... 6
Background ............................................................................................................................. 8
Stormwater Purpose ........................................................................................................... 8
Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) -Stormwater Quality ............................ 10
Part III: Stormwater Utility Rate Proposal ............................................................................. 12
Current Funding ................................................................................................................ 12
Revenue Forecast and Requirements .............................................................................. 14
Organization Chart ................................................................................................................ 16
Proposed Stormwate r Utility Division Structure ................................................................ 16
Appendices
Appendix A -Stormwater Fund 5 Year Forecast ........................................................... A -i
Appendix B -Stormwater Utility Satus Quo Funding Chart .......................................... A -ii
Appendix C -Stormwate r Fund Preferred Scenario 5 Year Forecast.. ........................ A -iii
Appendix D -Sto r mwater Fund Preferred Scenarion Chart ......................................... A -iv
Appendix E -Stormwater Project Listing ....................................................................... A -v
Appendix F -Western Kentucky University .................................................................. A -vi
Appendix G -Equivalent Residential Un it Study ........................................................ A -vii
Page 12
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date 01-21-2016
PART I. Executive Summary
In Oro Valley the Stormwater program was initiated to fulfil the Environmental Protection
Agency 's minimum requirement to regulate first flush pollutants which may enter our
waterways. The Town's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4) permitted activities
are part of this program and as discussed further will describe Stormwater Quality.
Additionally the town has responsibilities regarding flood protection and floodplain
management for our community that require maintenance and additional monitoring of
aging Stormwater conveyance infrastructure hence known as Stormwater Quantity. This
may require debris and sediment removal, vegetation management, facilities maintenance
and possibly new facility construction for safety concerns .
The Stormwater Utility is responsible for Stormwater Quality and Stormwater Quantity.
The functions and duties of the Oro Valley Stormwater Utility Commission "Commission"
include reviewing and developing recommendations for Stormwater revenue requirements,
Stormwater rates and fee structures . Controlling the quantity of Stormwater drainage runoff
and aiding in water quality management has become essential in keeping our water safe for
all of its many uses.
The Stormwater Utility has been in place since 2004 and associated fees since 2007 . Since
the initial rate was established no formal review of the program and associated rates has
taken place. It is the intention of the Commission to annually evaluate the rates and
analyze them to assure the recommendations meet Town policies and ensure the financia l
stability of the program and associated projects.
This Stormwater Rate Analysis Report conta ins detailed informatio n on the Stormwater
Utility fund. The Stormwater Ut ility (Utility) is an enterprise of the Town and generates
revenue from rates, fees and charges and does not receive revenue from taxes or
payments from the General Fund. The management of the monthly utility fees include
personne l , operations and maintenance of the Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer
Systems (MS4) Program. The Utility pays the General Fund for services received including
finance, human resources, information technology, legal, insurance and rental of office
space . The Utility also pays the Water Department for billing and receiving of the monthly
utility fee. In addition, since the Util ity does not have its own maintenance crew, the Utility
pays the Highway Fund for associated expenditures including street sweeping, storm
cleanup and drainage channel vegetation management. The Utility also hires local
contractors to complete Stormwater projects that exceed the work load capabilities of the
operations street crew. This past fiscal year contract expenditures totaled just under
$100,000 for contract maintenance that included culvert cleaning, erosion
control/stabilization and street drainage interceptors
The Stormwater Utility Commission has made a recommendation for a Preferred Financial
Scenario (PFS). The PFS has been se lected to meet the mandated requirements as
outlined under the Stormwater Town Code 1S-24-13-H. The Town Council , by resolution ,
shall establish the annual (fiscal year) monthly base rate for the Stormwater Utility fee. The
base rate shall be calculated to ensure adequate revenues to fund the costs of stormwater
management and to provide for the operation , maintenance, and capital improvements of
the stormwate r system in the Town.
Page 13
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date 01-21-2016
Under the Preferred Financial Scenario, the Operating Fund will have an approximate
ending cash balance of just over $200K at the end of the five-year projection period. A cash
balance of 15% (based on revenue projection) is required by Town Code. This amount
preserves a balance of 17% to 25% depending on the fiscal year and the associated capital
expenditure requirements. The Preferred Financial Scenario includes cash funding to
preserve $50K per year for culvert and wash cleaning as well as increased expenditures on
internal small projects by $80,000 per year or $400,000 over the five-year period. The
Preferred Financial Scenario proposes no other new debt for capital expenditures .
This is the first year since establishment of the rate in 2007 that the rate has been reviewed .
The Stormwater Rate Analysis is prepared based on the most up-to-date information
available for a five-year projection period. It is important to note that there was a five-year
moratorium on fee adjustments from 2007 until 2012.
Operational needs and capital improvement requirements change annually and are carefully
evaluated when they are included in the analysis. The Stormwater Utility Commission over
the last 18 months reviewed several scenarios, however, based on the necessary funding
amounts required to meet mandated outcomes, maintenance requirements, and have a
five-year sustainable rate the proposed $4 .50 fee per ERU was recommended. Table 1
reflects the proposed rate changes to the Stormwater Utility fee.
Table 1
Stormwater Preferred Funding Scenario
FY 2015/16
Monthly Stormwater Utility Fee/Unit Curr~nt
Residential Rate $2.90
Commercial Rate $2.90
ERU = Square Feet 5,000
# of Units:
Residential 17,460
Commercial 5 ,068
Total Units: 22 ,528
Revenue:
Gross Revenues $ 783 ,974
Funding from Outside Sources $ 3,250
Grant Funds (one time) $ 35,000
$ 822,224
Additional Revenue
Purpose of Fee
• Program Development -project definition
• Program Proposal -project design and costing
o Budget development
Page 14
FY 2016/17
Change ~RU
$4.50
$4.50
4,000
17,749
6,335
24,084
$ 1,300,536
$ 3 ,250
I $ 1,303,786 1
$ 516,562
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date 01-21-2016
o CIP development
• Construction Management
o New projects
o Maintenance Oversight
• Increased Inspections due to State and Federal reporting regulations
o Newly identified washes
o Additional residential requirements
• Management of existing assets
o Review of status of infrastructure stability
o Service and maintenance work order schedules
o Annual review
Page 15
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date 01-21-2016
PART II. Program Information and Background
Why Must We Manage Stormwater?
The Town of Oro Valley administers, operates, and maintains a Stormwater Utility meant to:
~ Preserve valuable natural resources
~ Protect people and property
~ Reduce nuisance flooding
~ Improve water quality
The U.S. EPA has estimated that about 30 percent of known pollution to our nation's waters
is attributable to stormwater runoff. In 1987, Congress directed U.S. EPA to develop a
regulatory program to address the stormwater problem. The U.S. EPA issued regulations in
1990 authorizing the creation of a N PDES permitting system for stormwater discharges
from a select group of industrial activities. The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) is the administrative mechanism chosen for the stormwater permitting
program. In Arizona , this program is called Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(AZPDES). An AZPDES permit is required for any point source discharge of pollutants to
the Waters of the United States. Because stormwater runoff can transport pollutants to
either a municipal separate storm sewer system or to the Waters of the United States ,
permits are requ ired for those discharges .
ADEQ has prepared a draft 2016 Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System Genera l
Permit (Small MS4 GP) that is intended to succeed the 2002 Small MS4 GP (Permit No .
AZG2002-002) which is currently administratively continued. The review and subsequent
adoption of th is general permit is scheduled to occur in early 2016 . The draft general permit
2016 builds on the requirements of the previous general permit and is designed to control
pollutants to the Maximum Extent Practicable (MEP). The new draft requires updates in the
SWMP consistent with the specific 'permit requirements , implementing the program and
evaluating the BMP's as an iterative process to ensure BMP effectiveness. The new draft
permit will contain more specific tasks and details than the current 2002 general program
and therefore require additional management and program compliance to control pollutants .
Stormwater Infrastructure
Table 2
The Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) conducted an audit of Oro Valley's
Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) program to assess compliance with the
Town's MS4 permit and Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP) on February 26-27, 2014.
Page 16
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date : 01-21-2016
The audit included document reviews , interviews with Town program managers , and field
verification inspections. During the audit, ADEQ noted areas of potential noncompliance with
the permit. According to the Arizona Administrative Code (MC.) RI8-9-A905(A)(3)(a) and 40
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 122.41 (h), the Town is required to submit information to
ADEQ regarding compliance with the Permit and the Town's Stormwater Management Plan.
This plan was submitted and accepted September 30, 2015.
The Preferred Financial Scenario rate increase to $4.50 per month with a reduction in the
Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU) to 4,000 square feet will allow the Stormwater Utility to
meet:
~ MS4 compliance and review minimums as addressed in the Stormwater
Management Plan submittal (Stormwater Quality)
o Redesign program to meet new 2016 General Permit Requirements as
outlined by ADEQ
~ Infrastructure Project Identification 20% to 30% level (Stormwater Quantity)
-costing
-design
-build under $80K projects
~ Work order development (Stormwater Quality and Quantity)
-Prioritization of inspection and maintenance scheduling
-increased inspections
-increased Public Education
~ Stormwater Utility Program Sustainability
-5 years
Note : Program sustainability only accounts for funds to preserve activities defined above.
Additional County or other external funds must become available to pay for larger capital
projects which will be identified. In the absence of County or other external funds, the rate
structure will need to be revised again within one or two years or so that large capital
projects identified by the new staff can be completed and funded by the Stormwater Utility.
Page 17
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date 01-21-2016
Background
Oro Valley is located in northern Pima County approximately six miles north of the Tucson
city limits. The valley itself was formed by the Canada Del Oro Creek that begins in the
Santa Catalina Mountains. The town sits at an elevation of 2,620 feet, covers over 34
square miles and has a current population of just over 41 ,000. Oro Valley was incorporated
in April, 1974 .
The Town initially became covered by the NPDES General Permit For Discharges from
Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4) in 2004. This permit, often simply
called a "Stormwater Permit," is required by the US Environmental Protection Agency and is
implemented in Arizona by the Ar izona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ).
Neither the US EPA nor the State of Arizona provides any funding to Oro Valley for the
operation of the Stormwater Program.
Most cities and counties with a population greater than 10,000 and/or located in an
"urbanized area " as defined by the US Census must follow this perm it , which regulates
discharges of stormwater runoff to Waters of the United States.
Stormwater Purpose
The St ormwater Utility program is responsible for meeting all quality and quantity issue s
including the Town's Stormwater Management Plan , Floodplain and Erosion Ha z ard
Management, and supporting all other Town programs that are impacted by storm
events. This prog ram a lso coordinates with Federal , St ate and local govern m ent agencies
related to the Town's Stormwate r program .
. Typica l Stormwater Utility Activities Include :
• Implementation of all MS4 , AD EQ and EPA req u irements
• Drainage Channel and Street Shoulder Vegetation Maintenance (Quantity)*
• Storm System Inspections and maintenance/cleaning (Quantity)of culverts , basins ,
grade control structures, storm sewer inlets/outlets and drainage channels
• Storm Cleanup
o Street Sweep ing (Quality) -
Stormwater determination * vs Normal
st reet surface deterioration
o Low water crossings
(Quantity/Quantity)depositing sand ,
rock , boulders and vegetation debris
removal in roads during larger events
of monsoons
• Storm generated Debris Removal * in
washes (Quantity)
• Road Sa fety (Quantity) due to storm
activity at low water crossings and
shouldering due to erosion *
• Publ ic Educati on and Ou t reach(Quality)
• Techn ical Support for other division s within the Town(Quality/Quantity)
Page 18
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date 01-21-2016
• Minor Construction and Repair Projects (Quantity)-Post storm event structural damage
that endangers the public or may realize more extensive damage if not repaired
immediately*
• In-House Hydrologic and Hydraul ic Studies and Designs(Quantity)
• Floodplain Permit Review (Quantity/Quality)
• Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Plan Review (Quantity)
• Development Review (Quantity/Quality)Preparing and Revising/Updating Town
Ordinances and Manuals (Quality/Quantity)
The Stormwater Utility fee also reimburses the Highway Fund for utilization of the streets
crews for some of the activities listed above and marked with an (*). The allocated
expenditures are determined by task and scope and are assigned to the Stormwater Utility
funds and are not considered routine street maintenance .
Page 19
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date : 01-21-2016
Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) -Stormwater Quality
The permit provides requirements in each of the following six Minimum Control Measures
(MCM):
1. Public Education and Outreach
2. Public Involvement/Participation
3. Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination
4. Construction Site Stormwater Runoff Control
5. Post-Construction Stormwater Management in New Development and Re-
Development
6. Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations
More information about each of these six main categories is provided below.
Public Education and Outreach & Public Involvement/Participation
These two related topics focus on educating and involving the public in all areas of
stormwater management. Several factors associated with the program costs:
• The size of community and our target audience in order to increase Stormwater
awareness
• The ability to tie into other municipal/3rd Party education programs versus
developing our own
• Types of education and outreach media used
• The method of distribution through available volunteer activities/programs
• The methods of measuring success and reporting to ADEQ.
Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination
Our Stormwater Permit requires and is dependent upon identifying and eliminating "illicit
discharges." Town Code Article 15-24-14 defines the Town's Stormwater Quality
Management System and Discharge Control Ordinance, passed in 2008. It defines "illicit
discharges," prohibits them, and provides for enforcement options to eliminate them.
Program costs associated with eliminating "illicit discharges" are generated from the age
and extent of infrastructure, the mapping status and inventory of entire drainage system. At
present, services are based upon a complaint-based system versus a more costly proactive
detection. Current revenue covers staffing, contractor management, equipment to detect
discharges, and identify the source and cost of the actual repairs. It also includes Software
cost for database management, reporting and program evaluation.
Construction Site Stormwater Runoff Control
The next requirement of the Stormwater Permit is the control of runoff from construction
sites. Discharge of sediment or other waste (concrete truck washout, litter, etc.) from
construction sites is prohibited by the Town.
A permit is required for any land disturbance of any size inside the Town with a few
exceptions. Permit information and an application form may be picked up at the Town
Page 110
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date : 01-21-2016
located at 10000 N La Canada Drive or may be downloaded from this website page. Please
call one of the contacts at the top of the page for more information. In addition, any land
disturbance totaling more than one acre requires a permit from the Arizona Department of
Environmental Quality (ADEQ).
Program costs associated with this program element are dependent on the number of active
construction sites , the number of development projects in the pipeline, the average number
of inspections per site, and the current compliance record along with the efficiency of
enforcement.
Post-Construction Stormwater Management in New Development and Re-Development
Our Stormwater Permit requires treatment of stormwater runoff from areas of new
development and re-development. The cost factors associated with this part of the program
are dependent upon the number of development projects requiring municipal review and
inspection , the age and type of existing stormwater best management practices, future
enhancement of the review process to look for and encourage a site design, land use
planning for low impact development , and possible code updates to allow/foster green
infrastructure .
Pollu t ion Prevention/Good Housekeeping For Municipal Operations
The final of the six stormwater permit requirements involves the Town's own operations.
The Town must evaluate all sources of potential pollution such as streets and roads,
municipal parking lots , maintenance shops, outdoor storage areas, construction activities ,
parks maintenance and landscaping, and salt storage . Procedures to eliminate or reduce
the potential for pollution must be developed , and employees must be trained on these
procedures at least annually. Cost factors associated with this requirement include the
number of Town facilities requiring pollution prevention plans, street sweeping and catch
basin deanout equipment and labor, and employee education and training .
Storm Mitigation
Clean up cost FY 2015 $34,000
Page 111
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date 01-21-2016
Part III: Stormwater Utility Rate Proposal
Current Funding
Neither t he State of Arizo na nor the federal gov ernment provides funding for the Town's
Storm w ater Program. In 2007, the Town estab lished a Stormwater Uti l ity fee to pro v ide
funding for implement ing the requirements of the Stormwater Permit and for small cleaning
proj ects /larger project research and draft plans that cou ld be subm itted for county project
c o nsiderati o n.
Pima County Regional Flood Control District (PCFCD) under the State of Arizona enabling
legislation (Title 48 of ARS), is des ignated as a spec ial taxing d istrict and given the authority
to levy secondary property tax on parcels within the Town of Oro Valley. The Town of Oro
Valley and PCFCD have a very good relationship and over the past 10 years have been
successful in the delivery of both large and small Stormwater projects. However, this
funding is variable and not always available. In addition, the Flood Control District levy only
provides funding for quantity issues and quality issues are so lely the responsibility of the
Town.
When the Stormwater Utility was first established, funding for projects was secured through
the budgeting process and overseen by Town consultants . The FEMA Lomas Del Oro
project in FY 09/10 was the last big project to be overseen by the Town . Since this time the
PCFCD requests project submittals and then prioritizes them to determine which projects
will move forward. This year Pima County Flood Control District has provided significant
support in the area of wash maintenance. However, benefits from our partnership with
PCFCD range from limited small clean up to large project and include capacity for drainage
study. While a dedicated funding estimate is not available, the Town will continue to
request assistance. From January through July of 2015, PCFCD contracted to have four
lineal miles of debris and sediment removed, clearing existing blockages to improve
channel flow and subsequently enab ling mosquito abatement in areas throughout the east
side of Town. Fortunately structura l damage has been minimal and no major structural
damage has occurred.
Pima County Regional Flood Control District and other sources
Annual Contribution to Oro Valley
Funding FY 2010-11
Direct $ 3,507
Projects $ 471,0 00
Sediment
Removal $ -
Other So urces $1,329,000
Projects
Linda Vista Gabions
Poinsetta Dr
Lomas Del Oro
La Canada Underpass to date
COO River Park
FY 2011-12
$ 28,567
$ -
$ -
$ -
COO River Park Pedestrian Bridge
110 and La Canada Underpass improvements
Oracle Road Underpass i mprovements
Page 112
FY 2012-13 FY 2013-14
$ -$ -
$ 304,663 $ 290,000
$ -$ -
$ -$ -
In progress
In progress
FY 2014-15 FY 2015-16
$ -$ -
$1,062,561 $ 731,862
$ 101,750 $ 118,600
$ -$ -
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date : 01-21-2016
The PCFCD has already informed Stormwater staff that next year 's funding will be limited.
In addition , some items once available for funding such as low water crossings are no
longer eligible for funding even though they remain a safety concern for the Town . The
number of town projects is growing as more washes are identified and evaluated .
Attachment E lists all known drainage and Stormwater issues regardless of size and scope
that have been identified at this time. The Stormwater Utility intends to utilize part of the
increased funding to develop not only a project list, but develop the designated project to a
design level that will include costing scenarios for those projects under the Stormwate r
Utility purview. This process will allow the Town sound budgeting pract ices to evaluate
capital improvements and identify projects to submit for potential funding from the Pima
County Flood Control District. The new asset manager/engineer will be responsible for
defining these projects including separating out unit costs for services/deliverables .
Current Rate
Single-family residences currently pay $2 .90 per month, charged to their water bill or
separately by the Town. Commercial facilities and non-profits are also charged $2.90 pe r
"E quivalent Residential Unit" (ERU) of imperv ious area (driveways, patios, roofs, or othe r
areas where stormwater does not infil trate into the ground). At present an ERU is equal to
5,000 square feet per Town Code 15-24-13-G. The Preferred Financial Scenario includes a
five year proj ection of the fund and evaluates the impact of future costs and revenue
sources that w ill be required to meet those costs.
In order to cover various alternatives staff conducted an impervious area samp le distributio n
study this year to best determine the basic ERU value . The result of the study indicates tha t
the Town 's average rounded ERU value is 3,700 square feet. The report is provided under
Attachment F. Because the data used in the study may not include all impermeable
surfaces , e.g. some driveways , the Commission recommends an ERU value of 4,000
square as more representative . Therefore the recommendation along w ith the rate
adjustment is to reduce the ERU value to 4 ,000 sq . ft . This new ERU change will requ ire
the Town Code to be modified to reflect this new value. Along with the rate change the
revised Town Code will be submitted to Town Counci l for consideration and approval.
National Average
There are currently 1511 Sto r mwater Utilities throughout the United States (Campbell , 2011).
Western Kentucky University annually updates and provides access to their very extensive
Stormwater Utility database as summarized in Appendix F. This survey provides us the
opportunity to compare the Town 's current rate structure with others nationally. However, the
Western Kentucky University data survey results does not contain information about the
scope of activities of responding Utilities. The Oro Valley Stormwater Utility is performing
quality and quantity work whereas many survey responders may perform only quality work,
so direct comparison may not be representat ive .
The average national rate, as of the 2014 st udy , was $4 .01 per month . The rates range from
"no fee " to $35 .00 dollars per month to accommodate va rious programs with 10.6% of t he
national rates being $2.50 to $2.99, over 34 .5% of the utilities have rates averaging $3.00 to
$6 .00 per month . In addi t ion, for towns compa rable in population to Oro Valley , approximately
Page 113
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date: 01-21-2016
256, the average monthly rate was cited as $4 .26. The other noted comparison was the
equivalent residential unit (ERU) value of impervious surface. Only 11.5% of the utilities had
an ERU between 4,000 and 5 ,000 square feet. Over 22.8% classified an ERU as between
2 ,500 to 3,250 square feet. Many of the utilities , over 51.2% had an unspecified ERU.
Required Program Highlights
The additional funding proposed will not on ly provide for the sustainability of the core
program, but also for increased utility infrastructure assets and associated maintenance
requirements as well as fund the development of small specific community infrastructure
projects.
ADEQ has prepared a draft 2015 Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System General
Permit (Small MS4 GP) intended to succeed the 2002 Small MS4 GP (Permit No.
AZG2002-002). This draft is scheduled to be adopted in early 2016 , significantly changing
and adding definition to the Minimum Control Measures (MCM) required by each MS4 .
Adoption of the new rate will provide funding for necessary staffing to ensure continued
compliance.
Revenue Forecast and Requirements
Appendix A is a five year forecast for the Stormwater Utility should no rate increase occur.
As depicted in the chart, the utility has a structural deficit. The FY 2016-17 recommended
budget from staff would not meet the required reserve fund as outlined in the Town Code
15-24-10. A chart of the Stormwater Utility Fund is depicted in Append ix B.
The revenue forecast was based on analysis of the Stormwater Utility's monthly bill i ng data
from FY 2015-16 and a projection of growth in the number of housing units expected to be
developed over the next five years. The revenue projects a flat fee not dependent on any
type of usage but is only coordinated with the total number of ERU's calculated within the
Town. The growth projected in residential units is determined by the Development and
Infrastructure permitting staff based on trend analysis .
Appendix C provides the detailed information for moving forward with the Preferred Funding
Scenario . A rate adjustment of $1.60 from $2.90 to $4.50 would provide for a stable and
compliant Stormwater program. The increase is adopted through Mayor and Council
resolution which was last reviewed November 7 ,2007 .
Over the past 8 years the Stormwater Management Program has developed. The
opportunity presented to the Town with the initia l fee structure allowed staff to develop
principles and best practices to meet the requirements defined under the ADEQ MS4
program. The division produced its first annual report in 2008 and recently completed its
first EPAJADEQ Town wide audit. The program requirements to accomplish the utilities
mission have been better defined and quantified revealing funding shortfalls . With the
aftermath of the audit, potential future audits, and structural deficit, the rate increase is a
necessity.
The future expenditures stay relatively stable and grow to meet the projected personnel
costs , increase to support the Program Development, Design , Construction Management &
Page 114
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYS IS I Date 01-21-2016
Maintenance program projects as outlined (see note on page 7 regarding program
sustainability). In addition, the expenditures include a 3.5 percent annual merit increases.
These projected increases are consistent with the General Fund's financial planning . The
projected operations and maintenance (O&M) costs include inflationary increases in some
areas that average 1.7 percent annually. The inflation factors were provided by the Arizona
Department of Revenue .
Page 115
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date" 01-21-2016
Organization Chart
Proposed Stormwater Utility Division Structure
Page 116
i Position 100
percent funded by
Utilitv.
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date 01-21-2016
Maintaining our washes
Before
After
Rooney Wash
Page 117
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date : 01-21-2016
Appendices
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date : 01-21-2016
Intentionally Blank
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date 01-21-2016
Appendix A -Stormwater Fund Status Quo 5 Year Forecast
Stormwater Fund 5 Year Forecast Revised: 1/2212016 . -•• ---
FY 2015/16 I FY 2016/17 I FY 2017118 I FY 2018/19 I FY 2019/20 I FY 2020/21
Budgeted I Draft Projected
# of Units:
Residential 15,764 16,107 16,496 16,827 17,053 17,203
NEW: projected Residential 343 389 331 226 150 150
Commercial 3,852 4,063 4,063 4,063 4 ,063 4,063
NEW: projected Ccmmercial 211 ----
Metro Water -Residenti al 1,353 1,353 1,353 1,353 1,353 1,353
Metro Water -Commercial 1,005 1,005 1,005 1,005 1 ,005 1,005
Total Units: 22,528 22,917 23,248 23,474 23,624 23,774
Carry forward Fund Balance $ 299,844 $ 192,953 $ 93,695 $ (13,187) $ (85,369}1 $ (172 ,723
Revenue :
IMonthly Stonnwater Utility Fee/Unit I $ 2 .90 $ 2.90 $ 2.90 $ 2.90 $ 2.90 I $ 2.90
Gross Re~nues $ 783,974 $ 797,5 12 $ 809,030 $ 816,895 $ 822,115 $ 827,335
Fund in g from Outside Sources 3,250 3,331 3,415 3,500 3,587 3,677
Grant Funds 35,000
$ 822,224 $ 800,843 $ 812,445 $ 820,395 $ 825,703 $ 831 ,012
Expenses: 3.5%
Personnel
3.80 Current Staff
Total Personnel: $ 346,620 $ 345,568 $ 357,663 $ 370,181 $ 383,137 $ 396,547
Contracts/Services
Outside Professiona l Services· 116,795 a 117,963 119,143 120,334 121 ,537 122,753
Low Impact Development 35,000
Other 50,000 50,000 50,000 SO ,OOO 50,000 50,000
Stormwater Maintenance 134,000 b 138,690 143,544 148,568 153,768 159,150
Vehicle Repair & Maintenance 19,800 · 19,998 20,198 20,400 20,604 20,8 10
Equipment Repair & Maintenance 32,000 · 32,320 32,643 32,970 33,299 33,632
Rentals 250 3 253 255 258 260 263
Telecommunications 1,400 · 1,414 1,428 1,442 1,457 1,471
Postage 250 a 253 255 258 260 263
Printing & Binding 1,000 a 1,010 1,020 1,030 1,041 1,051
Tra",,1 & Training 5 ,000 a 5,050 5,101 5 ,152 5 ,203 5,255
Membership 7,500 a 7,575 7,651 7,727 7,805 7,883
Office Supplies 2,000 · 2,020 2,040 2 ,061 2 ,081 2 ,102
Gasoli ne 24,500 · 24,745 24,992 25,242 25,495 25,750
Unifonns 750 · 758 765 773 780 788
Bad Debt Expense 750 a 758 765 773 780 788
Field Supplies 9,000 a 9,090 9,181 9,273 9,365 9,459
Safety 500 a 505 510 515 520 526
Software Mai ntenance & Licensing 1,500 a 1,515 1,530 1,545 1 ,561 1,577
SW Proj ects 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
Depreciat ion 135,000 135,000 135,000 135,000 135,000 135,000
Tota l Contracts/Services : $ 626,995 $ 598,915 $ 606,021 $ 613,320 $ 620,818 $ 628,520
Capital Ou tl ay/Projects
Minor Assets 2,500 · 2,525 2,550 2,576 2,602 2,628
Misc -Mos. Trapping 3,407 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500
Vehicle/Equipment Rese"", 38,000 38,000 38,000 38,000 38,000 38,000
New Vehicles ---
Cap ital Interest 305 305 305 ---
Equ ipment 46,288 46,288 46,288 --
Total Capital Outlay $ 90,500 $ 90,618 $ 90,643 $ 44,076 $ 44,102 $ 44,128
Total Expenses: $ 1,064,115 $ 1,035,101 $ 1,054,327 $ 1,027,577 I $ 1,048,057 I $ 1,069,195
Ending Balance/Conti ngency Reserve $ 192,953 1$ 93,6951 $ (13,187)1 $ (85,369}1 $ (172,723}1$ (275,905)
24.6% 11 .7% -1.6% -10.5% -21.0% -33.3%
Vehicles ----
Equ ipment ----50,000
Veh i cle/Equipm ent Rese rve -Replacem ent $ 90,806 1$ 128,806 I $ 166,806 I $ 204,806 I $ 242,806 I $ 230,806
~ Assumes Growth in Benefits & Wages 3.5% b
~ Intemal drainage projects remain the same
~ Cost Escalation 1.0% a
No tes:
> continue to charge out operations su pport to Hwy Fund per current method
> ending re""nue amounts are estimates subject to further reviSion s, and may not tie to cash balance in fund due to timing of re""nues and
expenditures
A-i
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date ' 01-21-2016
Appendix B -Stormwater Utility Status Quo Fund ing Charts
A-i i
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date 01-21-2016
Town of Oro Valley :~.
~ Stormwater Utility Division
Fiscal Year FY11/12
Revenue $ 792.987 $
Expenses $ 788,247 $
CHART 1 • Status Quo Funding Chart
FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15
826 .738 $ 760,629 $ 771,888 $
1,055,761 $ 913,564 $ 1,1 20,268 $
FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17118 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 '
822.224 $ 800,843 $ 812,445 $ 820.395 $ 825,703 $ 831 ,012
1,064,115 $ 1,035,101 $ 1,054,327 $ 1 ,027 ,577 $ 1,048,057 $ 1,069,195
Cash Balance $ 549,974 $ 509,768 $ 516,740 $ 299,844 $ 192,953 $ 93,695 $ (13 ,187) $ (85,369) $ (172,723) $ (275 ,905)
Required Cash Balance $ 118.948 $ 124,011 $ 114,094 $ 115,783 $ 123,334 $ 120,126 $ 121 ,867 $ 12 3,059 $ 123,855 $ 124,652
STORMWATER UTILITY FUND
2,500.000 =.= Revenue =.= b:pl'!r\~e!. =e= C.lsh BClliitKe =4= fH~qUlrecJ (<'Ish Balancf-'
2,000,000
1,500.000
1,000,000 .~::===.~. _. . . . . . --. . . . . . . .
?oo.ooo
-=~;t. '" ~ -=~-,.. . . .---....--,= .... ==!---==-.-=. -==-,.. ,.. ,.. Iii.
·500,000
·1,000,000
FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY J5/.16 FY 16/17 FY17/18 FY18/19 FY 19/20 FY20/21 '
=e= R~;v~nuE,l $792,987 $826.738 $760,629 $ 771,888 $822,224 $800,843 $812,445 $820.395 $825,703 $831,012
=.= EXlJenses $788,247 $1,055,76J $913,564 $1,120,268 $1,064,115 $1,035,101 $1,054,327 $1,027,577 $1,048,057 $1,069,195
=.= (ilsh Balance $549,974 $509,768 55 16,740 5299.844 $192,953 $93.695 $(13,187) $185,369) $(17],723) $(275,905)
="'= ReqUired «'Ish Balanct· 5118,948 $124,011 $114,094 $115,783 $123,334 5120,126 $12J,867 $123,059 $123,855 $J24,652
"FY 2020121 begin use of vehicle reserve for veh icle and equipment purchases.
F:12 DIV OPERATIONSISTORMWATERI1 COMMISION RATE 2014_2015 REVEIWISTORMWATER FEE INCREASE FINAL RATE INCREASE· CHANG ES PER PAUl
Appen d ix C -Stormwater Fund Preferred Scenario -5 Year Forecast
Stormwater Preferred Funding Option -5-year projection Re\4sed: 1/11 /20 16
FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17
Monthly Stormwatcr Utility Fee/Unit Current Change ERU Notes
Residentia l Rate $2.90 $4.50 51.60 increase
Commercia l Rate $2.90 $4.50 S1.60 inc rease
ERU::;:; Square Feet 5,000 4,000 'Commercial may apply for credit
# of Units: Change in ERU requires the Town Code to
Residential 17.460 17,749 be modified
Commercial 5,066 6,335 Change in rate is accomplished through a
Total Units: 22,528 24.084 resolution
Carryforward Fund Balance 1 $ 299,8441 Is 192,953
Revenue: • Corrects structural deficient
Gross Rewnues S 783.974 $ 1,300,536 -In creases maintenance abilities
Funding from Outside Sources S 3.250 $ 3,250 Pro\1des staffing to
Grant Funds (one time) 35,000 -In creases reporting I ADEQ BMP's
$ 822,224 1$ 1,303,786 1 -Develop a CIP program with projects
Additional Revenue $ 516,562 -Manage and In spect additional assets
Expenses: Retum at a later date> if there is support
Personnel for project implementation
3.8 Current Staff S 346,620 $ 358,752
New· Proposed
1.0 Asset Mgr.lEngineer 69,089
1.0 Stormwater P!1 . ...const. Mgr 83,982
5.8 Total Stormwater Staff 153,071
Total Personnel: $ ~ $ 511822
Contracts /Sei"\4ces Tasks· Outcomes
Outside Professional SeNces· 116,795 118,000 • Project Id entification
ONE TIME GRANT 35,000 ~ costing
Design/Consultants 50,000 10,000 -design
Stormwater Maintenance -OPS 134,000 139,000 -build/maint under 80K
Increase Maintenance (Services) 80.000 • Work order development
Vehicle Repair & Maintenance 19,800 21.000 -priori tization I maintenance scheduling
Equipment Repair & Maintenance 32,000 32,000 -increased inspections
Rentals 250 500 -increased Public Education
Telecommunications 1,400 2.800 • New Program Compliance
Postage 250 250 • Personnel/Operations cost
Printing & Binding 1,000 1,000 increase for deliwrables
Trawl & Training 5.000 10.000 • Program Sustainability
Membership 7,500 7,500 -5 years
Office Supplies 2,000 6.000
Gasoline 24,500 27,000 I Note: Program sustainabilityonly I
Uniforms 750 1.500 accounts for funds to p r eserve
Bad Debt Expense 750 750 activities defined above. Additional I Field Supplies 9,000 18,000 County or othe r external funds must
Safely 500 1.000 become available to pay far larger Software Maintenance & licensing 1,500 1,500 capital projects which w ill be SW Projects 50.000 50.000 identified. In the absence afCounty Depreciation 135,000 135,000 or otherextemal funds, the rate
662,800 1
structure will need tobe revised
Total Contracts/Services: $ 626,99!j $ again within one ortwo years or so
Capital Outlay/Projects that large cap ital projects identified
Minor Assets 2,500 3.500 by the new staff can be completed
Mise -Mos. Trapping 3,407 3,500 and funded by the Stormwater
Vehic leJEquipment Resel'\e 38,000 38,000 Utility.
New Vehicles 35,000
Capitallnteresl 305 305
Equipment 46.288 46,288
lTotal Capital OuOay $ 90,500 $ 126,593
Tota l Expenses: 1$ 1,064,1151 1$ 1,301 ,215 1
Ending Balance/Contingency Re serve 1$ 192.953 1 1$ 330,524 1
24.6% 25.4%
Five Year Projection Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
~/1 7 FY 17/18 -FY1 8/19 -FY19f20 FY 20/21
Balance $ 192,953 $ 330,524 $ 321 ,659 ~ 328,160 S 316,742
-----. -----------
-Revenuels 1,l03,7861 $ 1.325.867 $ 1,342,006 $ 1,353,831.73 $ 1,365 ,678
Personnel S 511 .822 $ 529,736 $ 548.277 $ 567,466 S 587,328
O&M :,; 523,800 '$ 529,038 '$ 534,328 '$ 539,672 '$ 545,068
Ops Main $ 139.000 ~ 143,865 S 148,900 S 154 ,112 S 159,506
------Capila' $ 126,593 S 132,093 $ 104,000 $ 04~_(J()O_ $ 119,000
-Expenditure S ---;:301;21 5--$--1,334,732 S 1,335,505 S 1,365.250 S 1,410.902
.2".iOCa .. ~.~~'.~".:'_~ _ 330,524 $ 321 ,659 $ 328, 160 $ ~1 ~,_4< S <7 1,018
Reserve Belance Pe rce nt
~---------_.--.. -·24.3% -----_.-25.4 % 24.5% 23.4 % 19.9% .. . . -... -. -..
--I Purchases $ -$ $ $ .. $ 50,000
YE Vehicle/Equipment Cash Balance $ 128,806 $ 170,306 $ 215,306 $ 260,306 $ 255,306
Ve Ie es/equrpment Truc k Truck Sweeper 'Usa Be gins
> Accounts {or depreciation
A-iii
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date 01-21-2016
Appendix D -Stormwater Utility Preferred Scenario Funding Chart
A-iv
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date: 01-21-2016
~"'.,. .'.. :\.
\ .. ~ }
~.>., ..
Town of Oro V alley
Stormwater Utili ty Divisio n
Fi scal Year FY 11/12
Revenue $ 792,987 $
Expe nses $ 788,247 $
Cash Balance $ 549,974 $
Required Cash Balance $ 1 18,948 $
2,500,000
2,000,000
1,500,000
FY 12/13
826,738
1,055,761
509,768
124 ,0 11
CHART 2 -Prop osed Rate Adjustment Fu ndi ng Ch art
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17118 FY 18/19 FY 19/20
$ 760,629 $ 77 1,888 $ 822,224 $ 1,303 ,786 $ 1,325,867 $ 1 ,342,006 $ 1,353 ,832
$ 913,564 $ 1,120,268 $ 1 ,064,115 $ 1,301,215 $ 1,334,732 $ 1 ,335,505 $ 1,365,250
$ 5 16 ,740 $ 299,844 $ 192,953 $ 330 ,524 $ 32 1,659 $ 328,160 $ 316,742
$ 11 4 ,094 $ 11 5,783 $ 123,334 $ 195,568 $ 198,880 $ 201,301 $ 203,07 5
STORMWATER UTILITY FUND
=.= Rev€.'nue =e= Fxpen;.e~ =e .-C~sh Rdldnce =4Ii= Rl"IlUlred Cilsh BiJliJnce
1,000,000 . .=-:---:-:/ . .-, L ~.
'>00,000 .--.... _::.;:.,
~.=; =;----I .~ ==~.~~.~~F=~
• • .. .
a
-500,000
fV 11/12 fV 12/13 fV 13/14 FV 14/1'> fV 15/16 fV 16/17 fV17/18 fV 18/19 FV 19/20 fV 20/21'
=.= Revenue $792,987 5826,738 $760,1,29 5771,888 $822,224 $1,303,786 $1,325,867 $1 ,342,006 $1.353,832 $1,365,678
=.= (xpens(>5 $788,247 :>1,055.761 $9B,5b4 $1,120,268 $1,064,115 $1,301,215 $1,334,732 $1,335,505 $1,365,250 $1,410,902 . C<l!>h Bal~nce $S49,974 $,09,768 $S16.740 $299,844 $192,953 $330,5,4 $31.1,659 $328,160 $316,742 5271518 =-= ReqUired C.-Ish Balance> $1l8,948 $124,011 5114,094 $.115,783 5123,33-1 $195,568 $198,880 $20.1 ,301 $203,075 5204,852
"FY 2020121 begin use of vehicle reserve for vehicle and eqUipment purchases. New rate adjustm ent accounts for depreciation .
F:12 D IV OPERATIONSISTORMWATERI1 COMM ISION RATE 2014_2015 REVEIWISTORMWATER FEE INCREASE FINAL RATE INCREASE -CHANGES PER PAUl
FY 20/21 -
$ 1,365,678
$ 1,410 ,9 02
$ 271,518
$ 204 ,852
Appendix E -Stormwater Listing
The list of issues on the following pages is a compilation of drainage and
Stormwater deficiencies that need to be evaluated , designed, programed or facilitated.
Some of these issues have been on a list since 2001 while other deficiencies have been
added as new washes and new assets have been identified and inventoried . This list is fluid
and as additional issues are brought to our attention concerns, complaints o r evaluation
requests are made from the community the list is modified.
Issues have been categorized as;
• Restoration
• Maintenance
• Study
• Design/Construction
At this time none of these issues have not been assessed nor is there fund ing for any type
of evaluation or mitigation. The ability to evaluate these issues will provide Once evaluated ,
the Town of Oro Valley will have a platform fo r requesting funding o r competing for funding
from outside sources to address some of these issues . THIS LIST IS NOT PRIORITIZED IN
ANY ORDER NOR DOES IT INDICATE THAT THE TOWN IS RESPONSIBLE FOR
EVALUATING OR MITIGATING T HE ISSUES . PRIVATE WASHES DO NOT FAL L UNDER
THE STORMWATER UTILITY PURVIEW.
A-v STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date ' 01-21-2016
Intentional Blank
,~ Town of Oro Valley
~ Stormwater Projects
The following Storm water Maintenance Projects are categorized by:
(5) . Maintenance Recurring -Sediment Removal & Cleaning (m aybe storm related)
(V) . Vegetation Removal. Recen tly Completed
(DC) .
(M)·
Drainage Design a nd Repair -Construction
Management Studies
No . Location/Name
OC-1 401 EStrada Patania
,·1 Canyon Shadow Wash
Subdivision
Tangerine Hills
Canada Hills
Parcel K
Canyon Shadow Wash (lambert to Rancho Fe li z
OC·2 COO) (442-647)
V·1 Canada Hills Parce l K
M·l Carmack Wa sh Basin
S·2 Carmack Wash
OC-3 Carmack Wash
OC-4 Highlands Wash
OC -5 Unknown Wash
S·3 Highlands Wash
OC-6 lambert lane
OC·7 lambert lane ICasas)
Canada Hills
Parcel K
Pima County is
performing the
study
Owne r Description of Work
OV
In sta ll flared end and reconnect end of culvert, rip rap Drainage Designs and Repairs -Construction
Remove sediment in ROW north of l am bert -excessive Sed im ent Removal-Maintenance
sediment due to Septembe r 8, 2015 storm.
Soi l cement wash bottom deteriorating at multiple
OV locations with large eros io n: also Repair conc rete inl et Drainage Designs and Repairs -Construction
wing wall on north side of lambert
OV
OV
Remove vegetation/debris in Canyon Shadows wash,
ROW north of l ambert
This basin that is comprised of numerous tributaries
that have a 100 year flow of over 3,000 cfs as they leave
the town boundaries. Th ese tributaries are causing
erosio n, sed im entation , and flooding problems at
numerous areas throughout the subdivisions they
traverse
Vegetation Removal -Maintenance
Management Study
Remove debris in ditches linda Vista from Oracle to Box d I '
cu lv erts excessive sediment. Se iment Remova M Mamtenance
PRI
Design drainage flow for linda Vista, Oracl e to Box
culverts, new design to have concrete bottom for
cleaning and sides ar mored for ero sion control
Design repair from Can Arches to COO, need 404 and
easements to control erosion -Oemo approx 1/2 of
exis ting outlet south of lambert lane and build to
correct outlet flow
PRI Conc rete wash repai r behind Fry's off of l a Canada
Remove debris in channel upstream and down st ream
PRI an d clean can arches excessive sediment due to
September 8,2015 sto rm .
OV Install short extension and flared Ends to all4 culverts
under lambert lane, East of l a Cho lla, place rip rap
An unnamed wash crosses lambert ro ad at a dip
crossing that causes significant flooding and sediment
Drainage Designs and Repairs -Construction
Drainage Designs and Repairs -Construction
Drainage Designs and Repairs -Construction
Sed im ent Removal · Maintenance
Drainage Des igns and Repairs -Cons tru ction
OV buildup at less than a 2 year storm event. In add iti on Drainage Designs and Repairs _ Construction
road edge erosion is affecting the structura l integrity of
the road. A box culvert project would alleviate this
problem a nd provide al l weather crossing.
CostType
One Time-
CIP
Recurring -
OP
Recurring
+4 yrs
Recurring -
OP
One Time-
CIP
Recurri ng -
OP
One Tim e-
CIP
One Tim e-
CIP
OneTime-
CIP
Recurring -
OP
One Ti me-
CIP
One Time-
CIP
Priority
2
(PR) • Pr ivate
Year Estimated Cost Funding
FY 2015 $
ann ual
FY 2014 $
annual
In
Progress
annual $
FY
FY $
FY
FY 2015 $
$
7,500 Pima County
5,000 Oro Valley -unfunde d
10,000
1st Year completed -
inspection in 2018
2,000 Oro Valley· unfunded
Pima County shou ld be 100,000 comp leting this study
7,000 Oro Valley -unfunded
30,000 Oro Valley -unfunded
600,000 Private -unfunded
80,000 Private -unfunded
30,000 Private -unfunded
25,000 Oro Valley -unfunded
Oro Va ll ey -unfunded.
600,000 PCFCO possible
1/12/2016 9:44 AM Page 1 F:\2 DIV OPERATlON5\STORMWATER\PROJECTS\Projects listing January 2016
;@ Town of Oro Valley
• "': I : Stormwater Projects
The following Stormwater Maintenance Projects are catego ri zed by:
(S) . Maintenance Recurring -Sed im ent Removal & Cleaning (maybe storm related) (DC) . Drainage Design and Repair -Construction (PR) • Private
(V)· Vegetation Removal. Recently Compl et ed (M) Management Stud ies
No. Location/Name Subdivision Owner Description of Work Cost Type Priority Year Estimated Cost Funding
Moore road currently has 3 dip crossings that become a
hazard annually during the monsoon season and must
be closed at a S year eve nt. The ro ad is a safety
One Time-800000 Oro Valley -unfunded. DC-8 Moore Road Box Culverts OV concern during and after eve ry rain event. This project Drainage Designs and Repairs -Construction $
will construct grade control structures and enhance the ClP , PCFCD possible
road structure with ribbon cu rbs to improve the safety
and reduce maintenance during rain events.
Saddle Clea n Culverts at Preakness/ Review Maintenance to HOA has drainage issues with in the subdivision
DC-5 6 Sad d le Va ll ey/Lo ga n's Cro ss ing Valley/Loga n 's PRI Gabion baskets in dipsection adjacent to Water Tank which need to be re-engineered by them -Cost OneTime annual $ 4,000 Oro Valley -unfunded
Cro ss ing TBD
DC-9 Mutterer's Wash Oro Valley OV Evaluate and redesign wash to improve water flow Drainage Designs and Repairs -Construction One Time -TBD Oro Valley -unfunded Townhomes while designing walking path along si de wash. CIP
V-2 Muttere r's Wash Oro Valley OV Remove vegetation/debris in wash Vegetation Removal -Maintenance Recurring -FY 2015 2,800 1st Year completed -
Townhomes +4yrs inspection in 2018
Add Rip Rap/Filter Fabric to south slope of Ball fields @ One Time -DC-10 Naranja Park Town Site OV S60'x 70' = 39,200 sq.ft. Find Alternative to Stabilize Drainage Designs and Repairs -Construction Oro Valley -unfunded
Slopes CIP
Design and build drainage structures to reduces One Time -DC-89 Naranja Park Town Site OV deterioration of "s lope/berm" along Monterra Hills road Drainage Designs and Repairs -Construction 1 100,000 Oro Valley -unfunded
impacting sidewalks. CIP
DC-11 Naranj a Ro ad @ Sa wtooth OV Shot create repair along hill side east of Sawtooth
Drainage Designs and Repairs -Construction
One Time -40,000 Oro Valley -unfunded within ROW CIP
New culverts at existing dip cro ssing to al low all
weather access during hazardous rain events . Th e all
Ironwood Hi gh weather crossings will pro vide access to Ironwood High One Time-1,700,000 Oro Valley: unfunded. 0(·12 Naranja Drainage Improvements OV School which is designated as an emergency Draina ge Designs and Repairs -Construction $ School ClP PCFCD pOSSible management contact location during local
emergencies. Th e improvements include nine 24" Rep ,
a 6 ceIl4'X10' culvert,
0(.13 Northern Avenue Drainage OV Comprehensive Drainage study and Construction of Drainage Designs and Repairs -Construction OneTime-$ 2,500,000 Oro Valley -unfunded
Improvements Culverts for all low water crossings on Northern . CIP
This project i nvolves studying the Peglar Wash Basin
(North of Magee Road between Northern Ave . & Oracle OneTime -
M-2 Peglar Wash Basin OV Road) within the Town of Oro Valley that is composed Management Study 2 75,000 Oro Valley -unfunded
of numerous tributaries that have a 100 year flow of CIP
over 1,500 cfs as they leave the town boundaries.
This project is to implement the recommendations from
DC-1 4 Peglar Wash Basin OV the Peglar's Wash Basin Mgt Study. This area primarily Drainage Designs and Repairs -Const ru ction OneTime -TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
deals with waters that travel through the Suffolk Hill's CIP
portions of the Town.
V·3 Roo ney W as h OV Complete yearly landscape work Rooney Wash Vegetation Removal · Maintenance Recurring -annual 60,000 Oro Valley -unfunded
OP
Shadow
Remove sediment in drainage easement behind homes Due to sto rm impact-S-4 Shado w M oun ta in Esta tes W est Mountain OV Sediment Removal -Maintenance
Recurring -FY 2015 S 7,500 excessive sediment due to Septembe r 8,2015 storm. OP PC outsoruced work Estates West
1/12/2016 9:44 AM Page 2 F:\2 DIV OPERATIONS\STORMWATER\PROJECTS\Projects Listing January 2016
,~. Town of Oro Va ll ey
~ Stormwater Projects
The following Stormwate r M aintenance Projects a re categorized by:
(S) . Maintenance Recurring -Se diment Removal & Cleani ng (maybe storm related)
(V) . Vegetat ion Removal. Rece nt ly Completed
(DC) .
(M)·
Drainage Design and Repair' Co nstruction
Management St udi es
No. Location/Name Subdivision Owner Desc ri ption of Work Cost Type Priority
DC·1S Shadow Mountain Estates West
V-4 Shadow Mountain Estates West
M-3 Un-named (Shannon) Basin
S·S Vista Del Oro Estates
V-5 Vista Del Oro Estates
M-4 Un-named Basin
STORM RELATED SM All PROJECTS
(-1 Newport Drive
C-2 Valle Del Oro
C·3 Atua
(-4 Lambert lane-Rancho Sonora
SR-l 9130 N Shadow Mnt
SR·2 10865 N. 1st Ave
SR-3 901 W . Valle De Oro
SR·' 321 W. Golf View
Shadow
Mountain
Estates West
Shadow
Mountain
Estates West
Vista Del Oro
Estates
Vista Del Oro
Estates
Oro Valley
Estates
Oro Valley
Estates
Oro Va ll ey
Estates
OV
OV
Design and repair alley drainage -erosion to area of
exposed gas lines
Shadow Mountain Estates vegetation removal in all ey
drainage ways
This project requi res st ud ying the area from Shannon road to
Th ornydale Road, from Tangerine Road to Naranja Road that
Drainage Designs and Repairs -Const ruction
Vegetation Removal -Maintenance
OV wou ld be use d fo r future Town Deve lopment/incorporation. Management Study
This is roug hl y 640 acres th at is compose d of numerous
tributaries.
Remove sedi ment Vista del Oro Estates exce ss iv e
se diment due to September 8, 2015 storm .
land scape in Vista Del Oro Es tates Wa sh
Thi s project requi res st udyin g the drainage areas that hold
future annexation pote ntia l for the Town of Oro Vallev. Th e
Sediment Removal-Maintenance
Vegetation Re mova l -Maintenance
study area would exte nd (south and west) from existing Management Study
Town limits to the boundaries of Orange Grove (to the south)
& Thornydaie (to the west).
Concrete drainage channel repair Chan nel -Maintenance
Concrete drainage channel repair Channel-Maintenance
Drop inlet add riprap repair erosion Channel-Maintenance
Reconstruct drop inlet Cha nnel-Ma intenance
Berm co nstruct ion -eva luate Storm Re lated Issue -Maintenance
Erosion control and stabilization -eval uat e Storm Re lated Issue -Maintenance
Erosion Con trol -eva lu ate Storm Related Iss ue -Maintenance
Erosion rep air, rip rap shoulder -evaluate Storm Re lated Issue -Maintenance
One Time -
CIP
Recu rrin g -
OP
One Time-
CIP
Recurring -
OP
Recu rr ing -
OP
One Time -
ClP
Recurring -
OP
Recu rrin g -
OP
Rec urring -
OP
Recurring -
OP
TBE
TBE
TBE
TBE
2
(PR) • Private
Yea r Estimated Cost Funding
20,000 Oro Valley -unfunded
89,000 Due to storm impact-
PC outsoruced work FY 2015 $
00 00 Oro Valley -unfunded.
1 , ° PCFCD possible
7,SOO Oro Valley -unfunded
S,OOO Oro Val l ey -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded.
PCFCD possible
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBO Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfund ed
TBO Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
1/12/2016 9:'4 AM Poge 3 F:\2 OiV OPERATlONS\STORMWATER\PROJECTS\Proj ects Listing Jan uary 2016
,~, Town of Oro Valley
~. Stormwater Projects
The following Stormwater Maintenance Projects are categorized by:
(5) . Maintenance Recurring -Sediment Removal & Cleaning (maybe storm related)
(V) . Vegetation Removal. Recently Completed
No. Location/Name
SR-S 180 E Catalina Shadows
SR-6 14255 N. Ave
SR-7 8980 N. Camino de An,a
SR-8 4 22 W. Hardy
SR-9 255 E. Newport
STORM RELATED ROAD CLOSURE -SAFETY
DC-IS Buena Vista north of Spring Valley
Dr.
Buena Vista south of Calle
OC-16
Concordia
OC-17 Calle Concord ia near Buena Vista
DC-18 Calle Loma Linda @ Calle Bonita
DC -19 Calle Solano wash area
DC -20 COO south of Riverfront Park
OC -21 Hardy Road, wash west of the
roundabout.
DC -22 Highlands Mobile Park
OC-23 La Cholla North of Glover
OC-24 La Cholla South of Casas Entrance
1/12/2016 9:44 AM
Subdivision Owner Description of Work
Berm construction to protect driveway " evaluate
Erosion mail box and ponding driveway · evaluate
Erosion at mail box -evalUate
Repair berm . evaluate
Erosion edge of pavement -evaluate
sediment cleanup> Road Closure -SAFETY
sedi ment cleanup> Road Closure -SAFETY
se diment cleanup> Road Closure · SAFETY
sediment cleanup> Road Closure · SAFETY
sediment cleanup> Road Closure· SAFETY
sediment cleanup> Road Closure -SAFETY
Road Closure -SAFETY sediment removal
se diment cleanup> Road Closure -SAFETY
Road Closure -SAFETY sediment removal
Road Closure -SAFETY sediment removal
(DC) .
(M)'
Drainage Design and Repair ~ Construction
Management Studies
CostType Priority
Storm Related Issue -Maintena nc e TBE
Storm Related Issue -Maintenance TBE
Storm Related Issue -Maintenance TBE
Storm Related Issue -Maintenance TBE
Storm Related Issue -Maintenance TBE
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time -
all weather road and el im inate road closure due CIP
to se diment -improving safety
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time -
all weathe r road and eliminate road closure due ClP
to sediment -improving safety
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time-
all weather road and eliminate road closure due CIP
to sedi ment -improving safety
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time -
al l weather road and eliminate road closure due CIP
to sediment -improving safety
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time _
al l weather road and eliminate road closure due CIP
to sediment -improving safety
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time _
all weather road and eliminate road closure due CIP
to sediment -improving safety
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time.
al l weather road and eliminate road closure due CIP
to sediment -improving safety
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time _
all weather road and eliminate road closure due CIP
to sediment -improving safety
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time -
al l weather road and eliminate road clos ure due CIP
to sediment -improving sa fety
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time-
all weather road and eliminate road closure due CIP
to se diment -improving safety
(PR) • Private
Year Estimated Cost Funding
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
Page 4 F:\2 DIV OPERATlONS\STORMWATER\PROJECTS\Projects listing January 2016
,~ Town of Oro Valley
:~.' Stormwater Projects
The following Stormwater Ma intenance Project s are catego ri zed by:
(S) . Maintenance Recurring -Sed iment Removal & Cleaning (maybe sto rm rela t ed)
(V) . Vegetation Re moval. Recently Complet ed
No. Location/Name
OC -25 La Cholla South of Lambert
OC-2 6 La Cholla South of Naranja
OC-2 7 Lambert east of La Cholla
OC-28 Lambert Lane west of La Cholla
OC-29 Landoran Ln
Subdivision
Oro Va l ley
Estates
~C-3D Limewood East of Camino Del Plata Lime wood
OC-3 1 Linda Vista near Egle ston Vista Mont ana
OC-32 Lom as De Oro at Lambert
OC-33 Moore East of La Cho lla
DC-34 Moore east of La Cho ll a
OC-3 5 Naranja @ Ironwood Ridge HS
OC -36 Naranja East of Shannon
OC-3 7 Nara nja West of La Cho lla near HS
OC-38 Northern Ave beh ind Walmart
OC-39 Northern Ave north of Cool
1/12/20 16 9:44 AM
Owner Description of Work
Road Closure -SAFETY sediment removal
Road Closure · SAFETY sediment removal
Road Clos ure -SAFE TY sediment removal
sediment cleanup > Roa d Closure -SAFETY
sedim ent cle anup> Road Closure -SAFETY
sedim ent cl eanup> Road Closure -SAFETY
se diment clea nu p > Road Closure -SAFETY
sediment cl eanup > Road Closu re -SAFETY
Ro ad Clo sure · SAFETY sediment removal
Road Closure -SA FETY sedi ment removal
Road Closure -SAFETY sediment removal
Road Closure · SAFETY sediment removal
Road Closure -SA FETY sedime nt removal
sediment cleanup > Road Closure -SAFETY
se diment cleanup > Road Closure -SAFETY
(DC) .
(M)·
Drainage Design and Repair· Construction
Management Studies
Cost Typ e
Engineer, design and co nstruct to make road and One Time -
all weather road and elim inate road closure due CI P to sediment -improving safety
Engineer, design and construct to make road and .
all weather road and eliminat e road closu re due On e Tlme -
to sedi ment -improving safety CIP
Engineer, design and co nst ruct to make road and .
d . . d One Tim e -all w ea ther road an el iminate roa clo su re du e IP
to sediment _ improving sa f ety C
Engineer, design an d cons t r uct t o make road and . . One Tlme -
all weath er ro ad and eliminate road closure due C
to se diment -improving sa f ety IP
Engineer, design and co nstruct to make road and .
all weather road and eli minate ro ad clos ure due One Time -
to sedi ment -improving safety CIP
Engineer, de sig n and const ruct to make road and .
all weather road an d el im inate road closure due One Ti me -
to sediment -improving safety Cl P
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time -
all weathe r road and elimi nate road closure due
to se diment _ improving sa fe ty CI P
Engineer, desig n and const ruct to make road and .
al l weathe r road and eli minate road clos ure due One Tlme -
to sedi ment -improving safety CI P
Engi neer, design and co nstruc t to make road and One Tim e-all weather road and el im inate road closure due
to se diment - i mprovi ng sa fety
CIP
Enginee r, design and c~nstruct to make ro ad and On e Time -
all weather road and ehminate road closure due CIP
to sedime nt -improving safety
Engineer, des ig n and construct to make road and One Time _
all weather road and eh mlnate road closure due CIP
to sedi ment -Imp rOV ing safety
Enginee r, design and co nstr uct to make road and On e Time-
all weather road and eliminate road closu re due
to se diment -improving sa f ety
CIP
Engineer, design an d construct t o make road and One Ti me -
al l weathe r road and eliminate road closure due CIP
to sediment -improving safety
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time _
all weather road and elim inate road clos ure due CIP
to sedi ment · improving sa fety
Engineer, design and cons truct to ma ke road and One Time -
all weather road and e hm inate roa d closu re due CIP
to sediment -Improving safety
(PR) • Private
Pri o rity Yea r Estimated Cost Funding
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Va ll ey -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Vall ey -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Va ll ey -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -un funded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfu nded
TBD Oro Val ley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
Page 5 F:\2 DIV OPERA Tl DNS\STORMWAT ER\PROJ ECTS\Project s listing January 2016
,~. Town of Oro Valley
~f Stormwater Pr ojects
The following Stormwater Maintenance Projects are categorized by:
(S) . Maintenance Recurring -Sed iment Removal & Cleaning (maybe storm related)
(V) . Vegetation Removal. Recently Comp leted
No. Location/Name
OC·40
Northern Ave so uth of camino
cortaro
DC ·41 Northern Ave sou th of Magee
DC·42 Overlook sou th of Calle Concordia
DC ·43 Pistachio @ culverts
DC ·44 Pistachio @ Pomegranate
DC-4S Rancho Sonora Dr
DC-46 Shannon South of Naranja
DC.47 Shannon to stop traffic from
crossi ng the was h at the north end.
DC·48 Suffolk Dr @ Village
DC·49 Tangerine -by Camino Del Plata
Subdivision
Tangerin Rd
construction FY
2016
Tangerin Rd
DC-SO Tangerine -one at town boundary construction FY
2016
DC·S1 Tangerine @ Camino Del Plata
DC -52 Tangerine and area between La
Cholla and La Canada.
DC-53 Tangerine West of La Cholla
DC-54 Valle Del Oro RD
1/12/2016 9:44 AM
Tangerin Rd
construction FY
2016
Tange rin Rd
construction FY
2016
Tangerin Rd
construction FY
2016
Owner Description of Work
sedi men t cleanup> Road Closure -SAFETY
sed iment cleanup> Road Closure -SAFETY
sed im ent cleanup> Road Closure -SAFETY
se dim ent cleanup> Road Closure -SAFETY
sediment cleanup> Road Closure -SAFETY
se dim ent cleanup> Road Closure -SAFETY
sed im ent cleanup> Road Closure -SAFETY
sed iment cle anu p > Road Closure -SAFETY
sedi ment cleanup> Road Closu re -SAFETY
Road Closure -SAFETY sedime nt removal
Road Closure -SAFETY se diment removal
Road Closure -SAFETY sediment removal
Road Closu re ~ SAFETY sediment removal
Road Closure ~ SAFETY sediment removal
sediment cleanup> Road Closure -SAFETY
(DC) . Drainage Design and Repair -Construction (PR) -Private
(M)' Management Studies
Cost Type Prio rity Yea r Estimated Cost Funding
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time -
all weather road and eliminate road closure due
to sediment -improving safety CIP
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time _
all weather road and eliminate road closure due CIP TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
to sediment -imprOVing safety
Enginee r, design and construct to make road and One Time _
all weather road and eliminate road closure due CIP TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
to sediment -Improvmg safety
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time _
al l weather road and eliminate road closure due CIP TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
to sed iment -Improving safety
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time _
all weather road and eliminate road closure due ClP TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
to sediment -Improving safety
Engineer, design and construct to make road and OneTime -all weather road and eliminate road closure due TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
to sediment -improving safety CIP
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time -
all weather road and .el iminate road closure due CIP TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
to sediment -Improving safety
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time-
all weather road and .e liminate road closure due CIP TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
to se diment -Improving safety
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time-
all weather road and eliminate road closure due CIP TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
to sediment -improving safety
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time-RTA/PAG funded-all weather road and eliminate road closure due CIP ongoing In project cost Tangerine Rd Project to sediment -improving safety
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time _ RTA/PAG funded -all weather road and eliminate road closure due CIP ongoing jn project cost
Tange ri ne Rd Project to sediment -Improving safety
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time-RTA/PAG funded-all weather road and eliminate road closure due CIP ongoing In project cost
Tangerine Rd Project to sediment -improving safety
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time -RTA/PAG funded -all weather road and eliminate road closure due CIP ong oing In project cost
Tangerine Rd Project to sediment -improving safety
Engineer, design and cons t ruct to make road and One Time _ RTA/PAG funded-all weather road and eliminate road closure due CIP ongo ing In project cost
Tangerine Rd Project to sediment -Improving safety
Engineer, design and construct to make road and One Time _
Oro Valley -unfunded all weather road and eliminate road closure due CIP TBD
to sediment -improving safety
Page 6 F:\2 DIV DPERATlONS\STORMWATER\PROJECTS\Projects Listing January 2016
,~, Town of Oro Valley
~ Stormwater Projects
The following Stormwater Maintenance Projects are categorized by:
(5) . Maintenance Recurring -Sediment Removal & Cleaning (maybe storm related)
(V) . Vegetation Removal. Recently Comp leted
No . Location/Name
DC-55 Valle Del Oro Rd at CC
~C -56 La Cholla @ Tangerine
DC -58 8151 Northern Ave .
DC -50 8252 N Northern Ave.
OC-61 Casas Lindas Apts
OC-62 2005 W Glover Rd
OC-63 Bridge on Monterra Vista Dr.
DC -67 Naranja Dr.
OC-69 60S E Windy Peak
OC -71 363 E Sunburst -Pau l Parisi
OC-73 Oracle Square @ Hardy
OC-76 Oracle Rd. Drainage N' of Calle
Conco rdi a
DC-79 Rock Ridge Apts
DC-81 Rivers Edge 5'
OC-83 Rivers Edge N'
Subdivision
La Cholla
Northern Av e.
Northern Ave.
Northern Ave .
Ironwood
Ranch
Monterra Knolls
Canada Ridge
Rancho Catalina
Rancho Catalina
Shadow
Mountain
Estates
Vista Mantana
Pu sc h View
lane
Rivers Edge (1 -
89)
Rivers Edge
(103-120)
Owner Desc ription of Work
sed iment cleanup> Road Closure -SAFETY
Sediment removal from drop inlet culvert
Debris removal from outlet
Debris removal from inlets
Debris removal from inlet in ROW
Oebri s/Veg /Sediment Removal from outlet of box culvert
and manage downstream veg
Debris/Veg /Sediment Removal from outlet of box culvert
and manage downst ream veg
Box Culvert in ROW west of Eagle Crest Or.· inlet /outlet
need debris/veg removal
Drainage improvements
Veg remova l and Channelization of wash running across
Rancho Catalina Ave between 455 E Windy Vista PI. and 8405
N Rancho Catalina Dr.
Drainage improvements
Drainage improvements -channelization of sheetflow onto
Egleston contributing to flooding in Vista Mantan a
Su bdivi sio n
Drainage channell on S' sid e of Pusch View Lane Needs Veg
cleanup/debris removal
PRI Drainage Channel outlet to COO needs Veg Mgmt
Box Culvert crossing Lambert needs sediment removed
(DC) .
(M)
Drainage Design and Repair -Construction
Management Studies
Cost Ty pe
Engineer, design and cons truct to make road and One Time _
ali weather road and eliminate road closu re due
to sediment -improving safety
Add Berm and waddles to slow and
control/direct flow into the in let
Sto rm Drain under Northern b locked by
Veg/debris/5ediment at outlet
Storm Drain under Northern blocked by
Veg/debris/Sediment at inlet
Northern blocked by Veg/debris/Sediment at
inlet
Po ssi ble Detention Project -Engineer/Design
Discuss Easement behind lots from 625 E Windy
Peak Dr -8530 N Ranch Catalina with possible
detention project. AI Coons
Dra ina ge Study -900 cfs Coming across Oracle
thru box cu lvert into Shadow Mountain Estates
Drainage Study/Temporary Solutions
ROW
Private
CIP
Priority
(PR) • Private
Yea r Estimated Cost Funding
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
annua l 1,500 Oro Valley -unfunded
annual 500 Oro Valley -unfunded
annual 1,500 Oro Valley -unfunded
annua l 1,500 Oro Valley -unfunded
annual 2,500 Oro Valley -unfunded
annual 3,000 Oro Valley -unfunded
annual 2,000 Oro Valley -unfunded
10,000 Oro Valley -unfunded
7,500 Oro Valley -unfunded
10,000 Oro Valley -unfunded
30,000 Oro Valley -unfunded
annu al 1,500 Oro Valley -unfunded
Private Private -unfunded
annual 4,500 Oro Valley -unfunded
1/12/2016 9:44 AM Page 7 F:\2 DIV OPERATlON5\5TORMWATER\PROJECTS\Projects Li sting January 2016
,~, Town of Oro Valley
~ Stormwater Projects
The following Stormwater Maintenance Projects are catego ri zed by:
(S) . Maintenance Recurring -Sedi m ent Removal & Cleaning (m aybe sto rm related)
(V) . Vegetation Removal. Recently Completed
(DC) .
(M)·
Drainage Design and Repair -Construction
Management Studies
No . Location/Name
OC -84 Vista Catalina
DC-57 8305 Northern Ave.
DC-59 8090/8041 Northern Ave.
DC-65 Ironwood Valley Dr.
0(-68 Naranja Dr .
DC-7o 8620 N Glenhurst PI.
DC-75 Oracle Rd. Drai nage N' of Ca ll e
Concord ia
DC-8o Rooney Wash
DC-85 10707 N Pomegranite Dr.
Subd ivi sion
Vista Catalina
Northern Ave .
Northern Ave .
Tangerine
Heights
Canada Ridge
Sun nyslope
OV Aquatic
Center
Oracle Road E'
side
Monte Del Oro
DC-54 Tangerine Road @ Highlands Wash Monterra Knolls
(east of Monterra Knolls)
DC-66 Reflection Ridge Dr
DC-72 Campo Bello
DC-74 Oracle Rd. Drainage S' of Calle
Concordia
OC -77 Oracle Rd . Drain age N' of EI
Conquistador Way
OC-78 Valle Del Oro Town Homes
DC-82 Rivers Edge N'
Tange rine
Heights
Campo Bello
Shadow
Mountain
Estates
Mutterers Wash
S'
Mutterers Wash
S'
Pusch Ridge
Vistas II
Owner Description of Work
Channel Nt of Vista Catalina/S' of Highland s Mobile Park
requires veg/debris/sediment removal
Debris removal from outlet/Cannot find inlet
DebriS removal from inlets/ou tl ets
Box Culvert -manage erosion cutting rrom road down sides
of box culvert
Box Culvert in ROW east of Canada Ridge Dr . -outlet need
debris/veg removal
Draina ge improvements
Drainage Improvements
Drainage channel on E' side of Oracle Rd. Needs Veg
cleanup/debris removal at inlet
Drainage requires refinement
DebrisNeg /Sediment Removal from Inlet/outlet of box
culvert and manage downstream veg
Storm Drain under Northern blocked by
Veg/debris/Sediment at outlet
Sto r m Drain under Northern blocked by
Veg/debris/Sed lment at outlet
need to engineer permanent so lution
Changes in Federal land to the east -altering
flows to t he west
Drainage Study
ROW /ADOn
ROW erosion at entry rrom Tangerine and north along W'side Contact Water to discuss eros ion around box
ROW
Drainage improvements Drainage Study
Drainage imp rovements Drainage Study
Drainage from Wolfley/Ajacent Property add in g to sediment Discus s with property owners need for eros ion
Problem into Mutterers. Deep Erosion cuts next to spillway I
on EI Conquistador Way (Private Property) contro
Drai na ge Channell exiting Va ll e Del Oro town hom es needs to Discuss with property owners need for eros ion
be cleaned".Veg/Debris/Sedlmet control
Hillside at 10831 N Pusch Ridge View PI. Needs Erosion
Control Pus ch Ridge Vistas II HOA
CostType
(PR) • Private
Priority Year Estimated Cost Fu nding
TBD 10,000 Oro Valley -unfunded
annual 500 Oro Valley -unfunded
annual 1,500 Oro Valley -unfunded
annual SOO Oro Valley -unfunded
annual 1,500 Oro Valley -unfunded
TSD Oro Valley -unfunded
3,000 Oro Valley -unfunded
annual 1,500 Oro Valley -unfunded
1,000 Oro Va ll ey -unfu nded
annual 5,000 Oro Valley -unfunded
500 Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
1,500 Oro Valley -unfunded
TBD Oro Valley -unfunded
Privat e Oro Valley -u nfunded
Private Oro Valley -unfunded
1/12/2016 9:44 AM PageS F:\2 DIV OPERATlONS\STORMWATER\PROJECTS\Projects listing January 2016
~, Town of Oro Valley
~ Stormwater Projects
The following Stormwater Maintenance Projects are categorized by:
(S) . Maintenance Recurring -Sediment Removal & Cleaning (maybe storm related)
(V) . Vegetation Removal. Recently Completed
No. location/Name
OC -86 1001 E Linda Vista Blvd
OC-87 Rancho Sonora Dr
DC-88 Shadows of the Ridge
1/12/2016 9:44 AM
Subdivision
Pusch Ridge
Estates
Rancho Sonora
Shadows of the
Ridge
Owner Description of Work
Sweep Road in front of house
Trash in Wash up against ba rracades
Sediment removal from drop inl et cu lvert
Page 9
(DC) .
(M)
Drainage Design and Repair -Construction
Management Studies
CostType Priority
(PR) • Private
Year Estimated Cost Funding
ISO Oro Valley -unfunded
150 Oro Valley -unfunded
2,500 Oro Valley -unfunded
F:\2 DIV OPERATlONS\STORMWATER\PROJECT5\Projects Listing January 2016
Appendix F -Western Kentucky University
Western Kentucky University What other are doing.
Stormwater Utility Survey Summary
2014
Average Lowest Hi ghest
Cities, Towns, Counties Fee Fee Fee
Total US Stormwater Ut il ities 1511 $ 4.01 $ $ 35.00
Fee Range No .
No Fee 264 17.5%
.01 to 1.49 96 6.4%
1.50 to 2.49 137 9.1%
2.50 to 2.99 160 10.6% 43.5% Town of Oro Valley
3.00to 3.49 81 5.4%
3.50 to 3.99 99 6.6% Ipossible Rates -Residetial
4.00 to 4.99 206 13.6% Rates FY 15/16 Increase Funds
5.00 to 5.99 136 9.0% 34.5% $ 2.90 $ 783,974
6.00 t o 6.99 97 6.4% $ 3.63 $ 981,320 25.0%
7.00 to 7.99 79 5.2% $ 4.35 $ 1,175,962 SO.O"..6 $ 391,988
8.00 to 8.99 46 3.0"..6 $ 5.80 $ 1,567,949 100.0"..6 $ 783,975
9.00 to 9 .99 29 1.9% 16.6% $ 7.25 $ 1,959,936 150.0"..6 $ 1,175,962
10.00 to 14.99 61 4 .0%
15.00 to 35.00 20 1.3% 5.4%
1511 100.0% 100.0"..6
Population Average High
~ 10,000 477 31.6% $ 3.71 $ 19.43
~25,000 388 25.7% $ 4.15 $ 14.00
~50,000 256 16.9% $ 4.26 $ 14.46 Town of Oro Valley
~7S,000 105 6.9% 81 .1% $ 3.93 $ 11.99
~ 100,000 67 4.4% $ 3 .71 $ 13 .05
~ 150,000 58 3.8% $ 3.94 $ 14.26
~250,000 59 3.9% $ 4.31 $ 14.00
~500,000 52 3.4% 15.6% $ 4.01 $ 13.78
~ 1,000,000 34 2.3% $ 4.34 $ 16.75
> 1,000,000 15 1.0% 3.2% $ 2.72 $ 13.48
1511 100.0% 100.0%
ERU Classifications
<1000 18 1.2%
< 1250 26 1.7%
<2000 64 4 .2%
<2500 112 7.4% 14.6%
<2600 69 4 .6%
< 2750 68 4.5%
<3000 82 5.4%
<3250 125 8.3% 22 .8%
<4000 122 8.1%
<5000 52 3.4% 11.5%
5OOO~9000 26 1.7% Town of Oro Valley
9001 ~ 25000 10 0.7%
> 43500 35 2.3%
Uns£!ec ified 702 46.5% 51.2 %
1511 100.0% 100.0%
A-vi
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date 01-21-2016
Appendix G -Equivalent Residential Unit Study
A-vi i
STORMWATER UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS I Date" 01-21-2016
Development and Infrastructure Services Department
Operations -Stormwater Utility
Re: Determining the basic ERU value
September 2, 2015
This memo describes the steps taken to date in the determination of an Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU)
which will be applied to the determination of a revised Stormwater Utility fee structure. The use of
available GIS data files in the determination of a revised ERU are discussed. Two GIS data files were used in
the process, the first of which is a residential structure footprints file. The footprints file is a GIS data layer
with file name [sde.5DE .Residentialfootprintj (footprints) which is located in the Town GIS repository . This
file was generated by the Pima Association of Governments (PAG) using existing aerial photograph raster
data . The footprint data is in the form of polygons which show the approximate footprint of nearly all the
residential and some commercial structures in the Town . Any misSing residential data would mostly be
structures that did not exist at the time the data was prepared. The footprint data is intended to loosely
represent the impervious areas within residential parcels. While the data contains essentially a complete
set of all the residential structures, the actual impervious areas of each parcel are larger than what is
indicated by the areas measured for the footprints file since the footprints file does not always include
pavement areas, outside concrete areas etc ... within each residential parcel. The data does, however,
provide a consistent and complete source of information to use for our purposes. The second GIS data file
used in this process represents the zoning in the Town with file name [sde.SDE.Zoningj . This data is also in
the form of polygons with each polygon representing the specific zoning within its area.
Statistics for each zoning category were extracted by first ove r laying the footprints file with the zoning file
therefore isolating footprint sizes for each zoning d istrict. The critical statistics were: 1) number of
footprints within a particular zoning district and 2) the mean size of the footprints in that district . Footprint
data for twelve zoning categories were observed (see Table 1). Please see the attached (Figure 1) for a
distribution of Oro Valley zoning overlaid on the residential footprints within the Town.
Table 1. Oro Valley Zoning Districts with Selected Statistics
Zoning Description Count Mean Footprint Size
Category (sq-ft)
PAD Planned Area Development 10,977 2752
R-4 Townhouse Residential 2,048 2461
R-6 Multi-Family Residential 198 1949
R1-300 Single Family Residential 0.15 RAe 99 529 Z
R1-14~ Single Family Residential 0.30 RAe 416 3826
R1-431 Single Family Residential 1.00 RAe 449 3808
R1-36 Single Family Residential 1.20 RAe 1,563 3494
R1-20, Single Family Residential 2.00 RAG 350 4400
R1-~ Single Family Residential 5.00 RAe 645 3183
SDH -6 Site Delivered Hous ing District 281 1861
T-P Technology Park 84 2181
C-1 Commercial 31 26,103
Note: The above data does not represent a complete list of all zoning districts and the Count values may be slightly higher for the
di stricts that are shown . Thi s calculation is a "first pass" intended to get a reasonable approximation of the statistics .
From the data identified in Table 1 all statistics for single family residential were used i n the determ i nation
of an ERU value . Single family residential was used since it comprised the majority of the overa ll residential
structures within the Town and it is typically used in the available literature when using ERU as a method of
calculating stormwater fees . The ERU was calculated as the Count weighted average of the mean footprint
sizes . The formula for calculat ing the ERU was as follows :
(Mean Footpri nt Size Rl -300 X CountRl-300 ) + (Mean Footp ri nt Size Rl-144 X Count Rl-144 ) + ...
(CountRl -3oo + CountRl -144 + ... J
The result for this calculation is 3701.218 indica t ing a rounded ERU value of 3700 . The current ERU fo r the
Town is 5000. This method provides a consistent and measurab le way to calculate the basic ERU .
Prepare d by:
Fritz F. Laos, E IT , CF M
Civi l En gi neer
Town of Oro Va ll ey Stormwate r Utility
" '"
I ;~ •• . -"::
'"
...
Town of Oro Valley
(00"9 fo1 ov· ~·.t •. our (ommvIItry. OUI lutu'l:
N
o •
Legend
ZONE
• e.,
.e.2
.e.N
• PAD
.PSC
.R-4
.R-4R
.R.o
R·S
R1-10
.Rl .144
D R1.20
• Rl·JOO
.Rl.36
.R'-43
D R1.7
.R1-72
.SDH.o .T.P
e'
W E . .
s
This map displays mainly res i dential
structure footprints and selected
businesses within the Town of Oro Valley.
Residential footpri nts were obtained using
existing aerial photos from Pima County GIS
database.
The Legend here is mainly to demonstrate
the actual number of zoning districts it being
difficult color mappping one-to-one on the map .
Figure 1
Residential Structure Footprints
overlaid on
Oro Valey Zoning Districts
0.5
Miles
':52.800 By:FFL
Oale:09I01I15
Ooc.umenl Palh. F .\2 OIV OPERATIONS\sTORM'IIATER\FRIl75 OIRECTORIESV'Fl R&glonal FloodpiainlMap$\lmpI'V$_St1cs\lmprvs_srlu.mxd
Bibliography
Campbell, C. WalTen (2011). Western Kentucky University 2011 Stonnwater Utility Survey,
Western Kentucky University , Bowling Green, 51 pp.
Town Council Regular Session Item # 6.
Meeting Date:03/02/2016
Requested by: Bayer Vella
Submitted By:Rosevelt Arellano
Development Infrastructure Services
Department:Development Infrastructure Services
Information
SUBJECT:
PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE NO. (O)16-03, AMENDING SECTION 22.5 OF THE
ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED RELATED TO THE CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT REVIEW CRITERIA
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the proposed revisions
included in Attachment 1.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The 2015 Planning Division Work Plan re-affirmed the need to evaluate the existing
Conditional Use Permit review criteria to ensure that 1) the zoning requirements are
clear and effective and 2) conditional uses have minimal impacts on adjacent land uses.
The existing Conditional Use Permit review criteria was last updated in 1981.
The Conditional Use Permit review criteria is used by the Town to assess and mitigate
negative impacts associated with conditional uses, such as traffic, noise, light and odor.
The proposed code amendment (Attachment 1) will improve the existing review criteria
by:
Building on the existing criteria that has proven to be effective
Adding three criteria to increase specificity and reflect current review methods
The proposed amendment was considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission on
February 2, 2016. The Planning and Zoning Commission has recommended approval of
the proposed amendment. Please refer to Attachments 4 & 5 for PZC Staff Report and
PZC minutes.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
Conditional Use Permits are required for uses with significant potential impacts on
Conditional Use Permits are required for uses with significant potential impacts on
adjacent properties, such as gas stations, car washes and drive-thru restaurants. These
uses require a greater level of review because they can negatively impact the
surrounding area with high traffic volumes, noise, light or odor.
Existing Conditional Use Permit Review Criteria
The existing Conditional Use Permit review criteria (Attachment 2) focus on maintaining
“public health, safety and welfare.” More specifically, the criteria is used to evaluate the
potential impacts related to:
Nuisances (odor, illumination, vibration, etc.)1.
Hazards (explosions, contaminations, traffic, etc.)2.
Compatibility with the surrounding area3.
The proposed code amendment is intended to build on the existing criteria to ensure
clarity and a more thorough evaluation.
Proposed Conditional Use Permit Review Criteria
In September of 2014, the commission was presented a summary of other jurisdictions
conditional use review criteria (Attachment 3). The commission provided input and
direction which focused on adding three new criteria, summarized below.
Mitigate potential impacts1.
Staff Comment: This criteria will clarify the need for effective mitigation by supporting the
Town’s requirements for conditional uses, such as taller screen walls, denser vegetation,
reduced lighting and traffic calming measures.
Consistency with the goals and policies of the General Plan2.
Staff Comment: The second criteria requires a Conditional Use Permit application to be
in conformance with the goals and policies of the General Plan. This will reflect the
Town’s current review method and ensure conditional uses are consistent with the
community objectives (e.g., community design, neighborhood compatibility, buffering,
etc.) outlined in the General Plan.
Hours of operation3.
Staff Comment: Some conditional uses can have early or late hours of operation which
can negatively impact adjoining properties. Adding hours of operation as a review criteria
will the illuminate the need to mitigate this potential impact during the review and
approval process.
Summary of Proposed Code Amendment
The proposed code amendment (Attachment 1) represents a reasonable and
substantive update to the review criteria that will add specificity and allow for more
effective consideration of the potential impacts associated with conditional uses.
Planning and Zoning Commission Study Session and Public Hearing
Below is a timeline of key dates regarding the proposed code amendment:
July 2013: Town Council approved 2014/2015 Planning Division Work Plan which
identified Conditional Use Permit applications as a work plan item.
September 2014: Planning and Zoning Commission study session regarding the
proposed code amendment.
October 2014: Planning and Zoning Commission Public Hearing regarding the
proposed amendment. Item was continued and staff was asked to take a broader
focus of conditional uses, specifically the appropriateness of some of the conditional
uses in the Table of Permitted Uses.
May 2015: Town Council approves 2016/2017 Planning Division Work Plan which
reaffirms the need to evaluate and update the Conditional Use Permit review
criteria and the Permitted and Conditional Use Table. The code amendment related
to updating the Permitted and Conditional Use Table is forthcoming.
February 2016: Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the
proposed amendment included in Attachment 1. The Planning and Zoning
Commission staff report and draft meeting minutes are included as Attachments 4
and 5.
Public Notification and Comment
Public notice has been provided as follows:
All HOAs in the Town were notified of this hearing
Public hearing notice was posted:
In the Territorial newspaper
At Town hall
On the Town website
To date, staff has received one letter of concern (Attachment 6).
FISCAL IMPACT:
n/a
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to adopt Ordinance No. (O)16-03, amending Section 22.5 of the Oro Valley
I MOVE to adopt Ordinance No. (O)16-03, amending Section 22.5 of the Oro Valley
Zoning Code relative to the evaluation criteria for Conditional Use Permits.
OR
I MOVE to deny Ordinance No. (O)16-03, amending Section 22.5 of the Oro Valley
Zoning Code relative to the evaluation criteria for Conditional Use Permits, finding the
amendment is not warranted.
Attachments
Attachment 1 - (O)16-03 Amending C.U.P. Criteria
Attachment 2 - Existing Conditional Use Permit review criteria
Attachment 3 - Other jurisdiction review criteria
Attachment 4 - PZC staff report
Attachment 5 - PZC Meeting Minutes
Attachment 6 - Letter of concern
ORDINANCE NO. (O)16-03
AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA,
AMENDING CHAPTER 22, REVIEW AND APPROVAL PROCEDURES,
SECTION 22.5, USE PERMITS, OF THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE
REVISED; REPEALING ALL RESOLUTIONS, ORDINANCES AND
RULES OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY IN CONFLICT
THEREWITH; PRESERVING THE RIGHTS AND DUTIES THAT HAVE
ALREADY MATURED AND PROCEEDINGS THAT HAVE ALREADY
BEGUN THEREUNDER
WHEREAS, on March 13, 1981, the Mayor and Council approved Ordinance (O)81-58, which
adopted that certain document entitled “Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised (OVZCR); and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to amend Chapter 22, Review and Approval Procedures, Section
22.5, Use Permits, to improve the effectiveness of the Conditional Use Permit review criteria;
and
WHEREAS,the Conditional Use Permit review criteria is used by the Town to assess and
mitigate negative impacts associated with conditional uses, such as traffic, noise, and light.
WHEREAS, the proposed amendments will include moderate updates to the review criteria to
add specificity and increase the effectiveness of the review criteria; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a meeting on February 2, 2016 and
voted to recommend approval of amending Chapter 22, Review and Approval Procedures,
Section 22.5, Use Permits; and
WHEREAS,the Mayor and Council have considered the proposed amendments and the Planning
and Zoning Commission’s recommendation to update Section 22.5 of the Oro Valley Zoning
Code Revised to improve the effectiveness of the Conditional Use Permit review criteria, and
finds that the amendment is consistent with the Town's General Plan and other Town ordinances
and are in the best interest of the Town.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of
Oro Valley that:
SECTION 1.that certain document entitled Chapter 22, Review and Approval Procedures,
Section 22.5, Use Permits, of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised, attached hereto as Exhibit
“A” and incorporated herein by this reference, to improve the effectiveness of the Conditional
Use Permit review criteria and declared a public record on March 2, 2016 is hereby adopted
SECTION 2.All Oro Valley ordinances, resolutions or motions and parts of ordinances,
resolutions or motions of the Council in conflict with the provision of this Ordinance are hereby
repealed.
2
SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of the resolution or
any part of the General Plan Amendment adopted herein is for any reason held to be invalid or
unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 2
nd
day of March, 2016.
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
Dr. Satish I. Hiremath, Mayor
ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie K. Bower, Town Clerk Tobin Sidles, Legal Services Director
Date: Date:
3
EXHIBIT “A”
Additions are shown in ALL CAPS font, deletions shown in strikethrough font
______________________________________________________________________
Section 22.5.A Conditional Uses
A. Use Permits: Issuance
Use Permits may be granted only when expressly permitted by this Code. Applications shall be
made according to the provisions of Section 22.4 of this Code. If a conditional use permit is
permitted, but no criteria for the specific use are defined in Section 25.1, the conditions for such
use shall be determined by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Use Permits, which may be revocable, conditional or valid for a term period, may be granted
only when expressly permitted by this Code and only after the Planning and Zoning Commission
has made a recommendation and the Town Council has found in writing as follows:
1.That the granting of such conditional use permit will not be materially detrimental to
the public health, safety, or welfare. In arriving at this determination, the factors
which shall be considered shall include the following:
a.Damage or nuisance arising from noise, smoke, odor, dust, vibration or
illumination;
b.Hazard to persons and property from possible explosion, contamination, fire or
flood;
c.Hazard occasioned by Uunusual volume or character of traffic.
2.That the characteristics of the use proposed in such use permit are reasonably
compatible with the types of use permitted in the surrounding area AND
SUFFICIENT MITIGATION MEASURES ARE EMPLOYED TO MINIMIZE
IMPACT ON ADJOINING PROPERTIES.
3.THAT THE PROPOSED USE IS CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS AND
POLICIES OF THE GENERAL PLAN.
4.THAT THE HOURS OF OPERATION OF THE PROPOSED USE WILL NOT
ADVERSELY IMPACT NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.
The burden of proof for satisfying the aforementioned requirements shall rest with the applicant.
Attachment 2
Section 22.5.A Conditional Uses
A. Use Permits: Issuance
Use Permits, which may be revocable, conditional or valid for a term period, may be
granted only when expressly permitted by this Code and only after the Planning and
Zoning Commission has made a recommendation and the Town Council has found in
writing as follows:
1. That the granting of such conditional use permit will not be materially detrimental
to the public health, safety, or welfare. In arriving at this determination, the
factors which shall be considered shall include the following:
a. Damage or nuisance arising from noise, smoke, odor, dust, vibration or
illumination;
b. Hazard to persons and property from possible explosion, contamination,
fire or flood;
c. Hazard occasioned by unusual volume or character of traffic.
2. That the characteristics of the use proposed in such use permit are reasonably
compatible with the types of use permitted in the surrounding area.
The burden of proof for satisfying the aforementioned requirements shall rest with the
applicant.
Attachment 3
Review Criteria Table
Conditional Use Permit Review Criteria
D e t r i m e n t a l t o p u b l i c h e a l t h , s a f e t y , w e l f a r e
H a z a r d t o p e r s o n o r p r o p e r t y f r o m p o s s i b l e
e x p l o s i o n , c o n t a m i n a t i o n , f i r e o r f l o o d
N o i s e , s m o k e , o d o r , d u s t , v i b r a t i o n , e t c …
R e a s o n a b l y c o m p a t i b l e w i t h t y p e s o f u s e s p e r m i t t e d
i n s u r r o u n d i n g a r e a s
I s c o n s i s t e n t w i t h t h e G e n e r a l P l a n /Z o n i n g C o d e a n d
t h e p u r p o s e o f t h e z o n e i n w h i c h i t i s l o c a t e d
P r o v i d e s f o r a d e q u a t e a n d e f f i c i e n t v e h i c u l a r a n d
p e d e s t r i a n a c c e s s , c i r c u l a t i o n a n d v e h i c l e p a r k i n g
H o u r s o f o p e r a t i o n w i l l n o t b e d e t r i m e n t a l t o
a d j o i n i n g r e s i d e n t s
C a n b e a d e q u a t e l y s e r v e d b y p u b l i c u t i l i t i e s
T h e p r o p o s a l w i l l p r e s e r v e s c e n i c r e s o u r c e s
I s c o n s i s t e n t w i t h t h e T o w n 's a p p r o v e d f u n d i n g
p r i o r i t i e s
W i l l n o t a d v e r s e l y a f f e c t t h e p r e s e r v a t i o n o f
p r o p e r t y v a l u e s a n d t h e p r o t e c t i o n o f t h e t a x b a s e
a n d o t h e r s u b s t a n t i a l r e v e n u e s o u r c e s
Oro Valley
Marana
Tucson
Pima County
Flagstaff
Sahuarita
Scottsdale
Peoria
Portland
4Conditional Use Permit Review Criteria Code Amendment
Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report
CASE NUMBER: 0V714-007
MEETING DATE: February 2 , 2016
AGENDA ITEM:
STAFF CONTACT: Michael Spaeth, AICP, Senior Planner
mspaeth@orovalleyaz.gov (520) 229-4812
Request: Zoning Code Amendment to the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) review
criteria.
Recommendation: Recommend approval
SUMMARY:
The Planning Division Work Plan approved in 2013 identified a need to evaluate the
existing Conditional Use Permit review criteria to ensure its effectiveness in the review of
Conditional Uses. Subsequently , the Work Plan approved in 2015 reaffirmed the need to
update the criteria as a primary objective. The goal of this Work Plan item is to ensure
conditional uses are thoroughly evaluated to minimize potential impacts on adjacent land
uses. The To w n of Oro Valley Conditional Use Permit review criteria was last updated in
1981 .
The Conditional Use Permit review criteria is used by the Town to assess and mit igate
negative impacts associated with conditional uses , such as traffic, noise and light. The
proposed code amendment (Attachment 1) includes moderate updates to the review
criteria to add specificity and increase the effectiveness of the review criteria.
BACKGROUND:
The goal of this work plan item is to update the existing review criteria to ensure the
effective evaluation of conditional uses.
Timeline
Below is a time line of key dates regarding the proposed code amendment:
• September 2014: Planning and Zoning Commission study session regarding the
proposed code amendment.
• October 2014 : Planning and Zoning Commission Public Hearing regarding
the proposed amendment. Item was continued and staff was
asked to take a broader focus of conditional uses, specifically
the appropriateness of some of the conditional uses in the
Table of Permitted Uses .
4Conditional Use Permit review criteria Code Amendment
Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report Page 2 of4
• December 2014: Conditional Use Permit code amendment sub-committee was
formed to provide direction and focus to code amendment.
• May 2015 : Town Council adopted the 15/16 Work Plan (Attachment 3),
which identified the need to update the Table of Permitted
Uses as a new, standalone Work Plan item .
As noted above , the Planning and Zoning Commission asked staff to broaden the scope
of the proposed amendment and review the appropriateness of conditional uses in the
Zoning Code. The 15/16 Planning Work Plan included a new item to specifically address
needed changes to Table of Permitted Uses . As a result , this code amendment will focus
solely on completing this year's Work Plan item regarding the existing CUP review
criteria. A future amendment will be processed later this year to address the Table of
Permitted Uses .
DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:
Review Criteria
Conditional Use Permits are required for uses with significant potential impacts on
adjacent properties , such as gas stations , car washes and convenience uses. These uses
have unique characteristics inherent to the use which require a greater level of review,
including high volumes of traffic, light impacts , noise or odor. The Zoning Code
establishes criteria for evaluating Conditional Use Permit applications as follows :
1. That the granting of such conditional use permit will not be materially detrimental to
the public health, safety, or welfare. In arriving at this determination, the factors
which shall be considered shall include the follo wing :
a . Damage or nuisance arising from noise , smoke , odor, dust, vibration or
illumination ;
b . Hazard to persons and property from possible explosion, contamination, fire
or flood;
c. Hazard occasioned by unusual volume or character of traffic.
2. That the characteristics of the use proposed in such use permit are reasonably
compatible with the types of use permitted in the surrounding area .
At the September study session , the Commission was presented a summary of other
jurisdictions conditional use review criteria (Attachment 2). The Commission provided
input and direction which focused on adding three new criteria. The three criteria which
were recommended for consideration are summarized below:
Ensuring impacts on adjoining properly are effectively mitigated.
The existing review criteria requires "reasonable compatibility"w ith the types of uses in
the surrounding area. Broadening the criteria will specifically require impacts on adjoining
4Conditional Use Permit review criteria Code Amendment
Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report Page 3 of4
properties to be thoroughly evaluated and effectively mitigated as part of the Conditional
Use Permit application. This will allow the impacts associated with a particular use to be
identified during the review pro cess and measures such as setbacks , access limitations ,
reduced lighting and buffers to be employed to reduce impacts on adjoining properties .
Consistency with the Goals and Policies of the General Plan
Currently , Conditional Use Permits applications must be consistent with the underlying
zoning district and any specific use requirements of the Zoning Code. Updating the review
criteria to include conformance with the Goals and Policies of the General Plan will help
ensure the proposed conditional use is consistent with Community objectives , specifically
those related to community design , neighborhood compatibility, buffering , mitigation of
traffic impacts and minimizing impacts associated with lighting .
Hours of operation .
Some conditional uses can have early or late hours of operation which can potentially
have a negative impact on adjoining properties . Adding hours of operation as a review
criteria allows this potential impact to be mitigated in the review and approval process.
The abOVe criteria (Attachment 1) represent reasonable and substantive updates to the
review criteria that will add specificity, lim it ambiguity and allow for more effective
consideration of the potential impacts of conditional use applications .
GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE
The Zoning Code Amendment was rev iewed for conformance with the Vision , Goals and
Policies of the General Plan . Listed below is a summary of the applicable Goals and
Policies in italics , followed by staff commentary:
Goal 1.3
Staff Comment
To promote a compatible mix of land uses throughout the Oro Valley
Planning Area
By broadening the Conditional Use Permit review criteria , specificity will be added as part
of the review and approval process. The additional criteria will help ensure effective
mitigation measures are incorporated to minimize potential impacts on adjoining
properties , such as setbacks, buffer yards , access and circulation , lighting and noise. The
increased focus on buffering and mitigation measures will further the objectives of these
General Plan policies.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION:
Public notice has been provided as follows :
• All HOAs in the Town were notified of this hearing
• Public hearing notice was posted:
4Conditional Use Permit review criteria Code Amendment
Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report
o In the Territorial newspaper
o At Town hall
o On the Town webs ite
Page 4 of 4
One comment has been received to date and has been included as Attachment 5 .
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the following findings :
• The proposed amendment wou ld add specificity to the review criteria.
• The proposed amendme nt wo ul d increase the effectiveness of the review criteria
• The proposed amendme nt wo uld minimize am biguity and improve t he co nditi ona l
use permit review process .
• The proposal is consistent with the relevant Goa ls and Policies of the General
Plan .
It is re co mmended that the Planning and Zoning Commission take the following action:
Recommend approval to the Town Council of the requested Zoning Code Amendment
OV714-007
SUGGESTED MOTIONS :
The Planning and Zoning Commission may wish to conside r the following suggested motion :
I move to recommend approval of the Zoning Code Amendment in Attachment 1 related to the
Conditional Use Permit review criteria , based on the finding that the request would improve the
effective ness of the Conditi ona l Use Permit review crite ri a
OR
I move to recommend den ial of the Zoning Code Amendment in Attachmen t 1 related to the
Conditional Use Permit review criteria , as the request does not meet the finding that
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Proposed Code Amendment
2 . Re view Criteria Table
3. Resident Comment
February 2, 2016 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 1 of 8
MINUTES
ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
REGULAR SESSION
February 2, 2016
ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
11000 N. LA CAŇADA DRIVE
REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER
Vice-Chair Leedy called the February 2, 2016 Regular Session of the Oro Valley
Planning and Zoning Commission meeting to order at 6:00 PM.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:Melanie Barrett, Commissioner
Greg Hitt, Commissioner
Charlie Hurt, Commissioner
Bob Swope, Commissioner
Tom Gribb, Commissioner
Bill Leedy, Vice-Chair
EXCUSED:Tom Drzazgowski, Commissioner
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Vice-Chair Leedy led the Planning and Zoning Commission members and audience in
the Pledge of Allegiance.
CALL TO AUDIENCE
Don Bristow, Oro Valley resident, commented it's a new year with new members to the
Commission.He would like to remind the Commission on the responsibility of making
recommendations to Town Council based on Town codes.Town code is law and the
General Plan is policy, it's important to follow policy and uphold codes.It seems as if
the Commission does not know codes under which recommendations should be made
and heavily relies on staff as there only source of recommendation.Because of this,
the Planning and Zoning Commission has sent recommendations to Town Council that
ignore the Oro Valley codes.Mr. Bristow ask the new members as well as the
continued members of the Commission to try and uphold the law.Your duty is to
uphold the codes and fairly represent the community.Please take time to study the
code and ask questions before you vote, uphold the General Plan and support the Oro
Valley codes which are law.This should assist you in making decisions that are best for
the entire community.
Attachment 5
February 2, 2016 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 2 of 8
COUNCIL LIAISON COMMENTS
No Council Liaison present.
REGULAR SESSION AGENDA
1.REVIEW AND/OR APPROVAL OF THE DECEMBER 1, 2015 REGULAR
SESSION MEETING MINUTES
MOTION:A motion was made by Commissioner Hurt and seconded by Commissioner
Hitt to approve the December 1, 2015 Regular Session Meeting Minutes.
MOTION carried, 6-0.
2.PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON A PROPOSED
REZONING OF AN APPROXIMATELY 142-ACRE PROPERTY FROM R1-144
TO R1-43 TO DEVELOP A 91-LOT RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION AND USE OF
THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE, BUILDING HEIGHT AND MODIFIED REVIEW
PROCESS FLEXIBLE DESIGN OPTIONS. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON
THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LAMBERT LANE AND LA CHOLLA
BOULEVARD, OV914-009
Michael Spaeth, Senior Planner, provided a presentation that included the following:
-Purpose
-Location Map
-Site Map
-Review Criteria
-General Plan, Land Use Compatibility
-General Plan, Road Widening
-General Plan and Zoning, Environment
-Conservation Subdivision Design
-Flexible Design Options
-Public Participation
-Summary and Recommendation
Commissioner Hurt recommended that all general notes shown in exhibit R be cleaned
up.
Commissioner Hurt asked if there has been any contact with Pima County and or
Federal Emergency Management Association (FEMA) regarding the flooding issues.
David Laws, Planning Manager, responded that back in 2011 the Town completed
improvements to the Lamas del Oro wash immediately south of this project.As a result
Attachment 5
February 2, 2016 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 3 of 8
the Town also proposed a LOMAR (letter of map revisions) process.Many properties
were affected by the FEMA flood plain.As a result of that,property owners with a
secured loan for a home were required to get flood insurance.
Back in 2015, the Town did get the LOMAR process approved through FEMA and the
result was the removal of a significant portion of those properties from FEMA flood
plain.Moving forward with this project,should it be successful for the rezoning,the
developer of the project will be required to go through a similar process for their own
property if it includes work in the flood plain.
As currently proposed,work is being done close to those areas.Property owners would
be required to go through the LOMAR process to get those maps revised.Otherwise
they are going to have issues with securing insurance.The portion between this
property and where the Town ended improvement is the questionable part.
Commissioner Hurt questioned whether the drainage analysis done by G. E. Fulle r
includes all washes?His concern is the drainage analysis appears to only involve one
wash.
David Laws, responded that an analysis was done for the three areas and focus was
the main wash.As we move forward through the development process, should thi s be
a successful rezoning, a very detailed analysis will need to be completed on each of the
washes, including encroachments into those areas with proposed improvements.
Commissioner Hurt commented that the property just north of Lambert Lane is
undeveloped at this point.Two of the washes that go through the subject property also
go through the undeveloped area.When that undeveloped property north of Lambert is
developed, it will have an impact on those washes as well as downstream.His concern
is the downstream issue and the property to the north.
David Laws, responded as the property to the north is developed,the developer will be
required to analyze the impact of drainage standalone.It is the downstream areas that
is actually making them go beyond what would typically be required.For the property
to the north they will have to do an analysis of existing conditions and evaluate
upstream and downstream conditions and incorporate a design that basically offsets the
excess stormwater that is created from parking lots or rooftops, sidewalks to make sure
that this is captured and held in place and slowly released to basically mimic existing
conditions.Ultimately the drainage criteria requires that there is no downstream
impact.So what you see today is what you're going to see a month later or a year later
once that development is constructed.So there should be no impact.
Paul Oland, WLB Group, representing the applicant, provided a presentation that
included the following:
-Updated Plan Changes
-Where we are at now
Attachment 5
February 2, 2016 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 4 of 8
-Downstream impacts
-Summary
Commissioner Barrett questioned the applicant on the portion of the property that is
undevelopable.
Mr. Oland responded, the Environmentally Sensitive Land Ordinance (ESLO) is meant
to protect the most sensitive areas of the property.It allows a way to pursue cluster
development which is encouraged by Town code so you can achieve densities planned
by the General Plan without disturbing or going into the sensitive areas.
Vice-Chair Leedy opened the public hearing.
Dennis Swena,Oro Valley resident,stated he owns the property south of the proposed
project.He has seen erosion of the embankment below his home.During the planning
phase of the FEMA/Lomas del Oro Wash Flood Control Project he was approached by
a Town employee by the name of Dave Parker and asked to sign a waiver allowing
construction equipment on his property.At that time Mr. Swena pointed out the erosion
of the embankment and raised concerns about it.The engineer agreed that his worries
were alignment and proposed a remedy which was drawn into the plans.The waiver
was signed, fully expecting that the Town would perform on it commitment.As it turns
out the erosion protection promise for the embankment was pulled out of the plans
without notification and was never constructed.Further substantial erosion was
suffered from the flood of 2012,his property is bisected in half by the Lomas del Oro
Wash.The engineering changes eluded to the general outlines of this project will have
a real impact on increasing the flow rate across his embankment that has been
mentioned by Mr. Spaeth and the developer.Currently most of the runoff from the ridge
north of his property becomes channeled and drains into the wash downstream from the
embankment.Together with this vague and underlying changes to the Lamas del Oro
Wash upstream from his property is cause for great concern.This proposed
development together with other developments upstream is having a very real and
substantial impact on property owners like himself.The plan before the Commission
shows dotted lines along the wash as it traverses his property, but what do those lines
even mean and how exactly will they be designed and constr ucted?How will it allow
access to the north half of his property and impact the value and usefulness of his
property.The developer has made some vague commitments in this regard but refuses
to provide the detailed information in order for Mr. Swena to make an informed
decision.This developer has promised substantial construction on his property but has
not been willing to provide the detailed information that he needs in a form he can have
reviewed by a professional and hold them accountable for their commitment.It would
be irresponsible for him to agree to these terms, as well as irresponsible of this
Commission to recommend approval of this project with so many questions left
unanswered.
Karen Stratman, Oro Valley resident, stated where the neighb ors left off is not where
Mr. Oland left off.This property including the corner lot which has been excluded from
Attachment 5
February 2, 2016 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 5 of 8
this rezoning is currently R1-144, which means that they are 3 plus acre lots. It
remains to define as low density residential in the current and newly revised version of
the General Plan.The subject property has been discussed extensively in regards to
the washes.Eventually this land will be developed and we are willing to work with Mr.
Oland and Town staff to make this project.The neighbors have met and believe there
is compatibility with the surrounding property owners, however the drainage is still not
agreed upon by many property owners and is a pretty big problem.As stated earlier by
the Town, we have put a lot of effort into exten sive concessions and meetings by both
sides and we believe there is some win, win between the neighbors and the Town and
developer.There was disagreement about the two-story homes and what she was told
was those rows of homes that have no red dots would have two two-story homes
maximum in a row.Ms. Stratman would like to recommend this proposed project be
approved with stipulations that the modified review process be denied and the
conditions asked for by the neighbors for the special use policies for the conditions be
added as well as including property owners to the south in any drainage design.
Liz Rulto, Oro Valley resident, stated she lives east of the proposed project and has
been involved in this process with Mr. Oland for over a year.This has been the most
confusing process that she has ever been involved in.Her main concern is the water
drainage from the north, a lot of the culvert systems that are in place have been
breached because of the intensity in which the water is moving from the no rth down the
washes to this property.The developer stated he can help people out of the floodplain
is a false statement.There is a huge process with FEMA.The modified review
process was never discussed in the last year of community meetings.Ms.
Rulto recommends that staff does not allow the modified review process.
Deanna Rex, Oro Valley resident,stated there was never a meeting after the new
development was designed.The last meeting was hosted by a retired WLB hydrologist
who stated the plan in place would not work.Placing the drainage downstream would
take her out of the floodplain.The promise now is to place these retaining basins in that
a retired hydrologist stated would not work.This new plan was mailed to us but
never was discussed as a group.
Jonathon Kearns, Oro Valley resident, stated he lives on the west side of La Cholla
where the other entrance will be located.This entrance is a very dangerous place to
pull out.Should the Regional Transit Authority (RTA)not do what they need to do prior
to this development, it will become increasingly more dangerous.
Vice-Chair Leedy closed the public hearing.
MOTION:A motion was made by Commissioner Swope and seconded by
Commissioner Gribb to Table the item tonight in lieu of additional drainage analysis and
maybe one more public meeting with the neighborhood.
7:39 Councilmember Joe Hornat showed up
Attachment 5
February 2, 2016 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 6 of 8
MOTION failed, 2-4 with Commissioner Barrett, Commissioner Hitt, Commissioner Hurt,
and Vice-Chair Leedy opposed.
MOTION:A motion was made by Commissioner Hitt and seconded by Vice -Chair
Leedy to recommend approval of the proposed rezoning from R1-144 to R1-43 and use
of the requested Flexible Design Options including minimum lot size, bu ilding height and
modified review process based on the findings in the staff report, subject to the
conditions in Attachment 1.
Commissioner Swope offered a friendly amendment that the modified review process
not be included in the recommended approval.
Commissioner Hitt and Vice-Chair Leedy accepted the friendly amendment.
Commissioner Barrett offered a friendly amendment which states that the lots be
confined to their developable area and still meet the 10,000 square foot minimum lot
requirement.
Commissioner Hitt and Vice-Chair Leedy did not accept the friendly amendment.
MOTION carried, 6-0.
3.MAIN STREET BRIEFING AND DESIGNATION OF PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE TO MAIN STREET FOCUS GROUP
Elisa Hambin, Long-Range Principal Planner, provided a presentation that included the
following:
-What are Oro Valley Main Streets?
-What are we trying to accomplish?
-Where did this idea come from?
-How can we make it happen?
-Where do we start?
-Can this really happen in Oro Valley?
-What's next?
Don Bristow, Oro Valley resident, stated he supports the Main Streets but has some
concerns.It's been stated that this a strategic plan from Town Council, but where did
Town Council get their authorization.There is nothing in the current code or general
plan that talks about Main Streets, the only comment is in reference to the art
district.There is another development district which is neighborhoods that talk about
recreational trails and so on.Mr. Bristow's second concern is the new Your Voice, Our
Future that hasn't been approved by the citizens yet.You're signaling the public that
you're not interested in the public approval of the Your Voice, Our Future.This concept
is rated as a medium level within the new general plan.As far as he is concerned he is
Attachment 5
February 2, 2016 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 7 of 8
asking the Commission to table this concept until the Your Voice, Our Future can be
approved.
Commissioner Barrett nominated Commissioner Drazgowski to serve as a
representative to the Main Streets Design Focus Group.Commissioner Drazgowski is
not present at the meeting, staff will wait to hear from Commissioner Drazgowski and
if he is willing or unable to participate in the focus group.
Vice-Chair Leedy nominated Commissioner Barrett as an alternate should
Commissioner Drazgowski be unable to participate.
4.PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING A
ZONING CODE TEXT AMENDMENT RELATED TO THE TOWN OF ORO
VALLEY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVIEW CRITERIA, OV714 -007
Rosevelt Arellano, Senior Planner, provided a presentation that included the following:
-Purpose
-W hat is a Conditional Use Permit?
-Existing CUP Evaluation Criteria
-Methodology
-Proposed Code Amendment
-Proposed Code Amendment Language
-Summary and Recommendation
Vice-Chair Leedy opened the public hearing.
Don Bristow declined to comment.
Vice-Chair Leedy closed the public hearing.
MOTION:A motion was made by Commissioner Hurt and seconded by Commissioner
Swope to recommend approval of the Zoning Code Amendment in Attachment 1 related
to the Conditional Use Permit review criteria, based on the finding that the request
would improve the effectiveness of the Conditional Use Permit review criteria.
MOTION carried, 6-0.
5.ELECTION OF OFFICERS
MOTION:A motion was made by Commissioner Swope to elect Vice-Chair Leedy as
Chairman of the Planning and Zoning Commission.
MOTION carried, 6-0.
Attachment 5
February 2, 2016 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 8 of 8
MOTION:A motion was made by Vice-Chair Leedy and seconded by Commissioner
Hurt to elect Commissioner Bob Swope as Vice-Chair of the Planning and Zoning
Commission.
MOTION:A motion was made by Commissioner Barrett and seconded by
Commissioner Hitt to elect Commissioner Charlie Hurt as Vice -Chair of the Planning
and Zoning Commission.
MOTION failed, 3-3 with Commissioner Barrett, Commissioner Hitt, and Commissioner
Hurt opposed.
MOTION failed, 3-3 with Commissioner Swope, Commissioner Gribb, and Vice-Chair
Leedy opposed.
Commissioner Swope withdrew his nomination for Vice -Chair of the Planning and
Zoning Commission.
Motion to elect Commissioner Hurt as Vice -Chair of the Planning and Zoning
Commission passed 6-0.
PLANNING UPDATE (INFORMATIONAL ONLY)
Chad Daines, Principal Planner, provided the following Planning updates:
-Town Council February 3rd Meeting
-Town Council February 17th Meeting has been cancelled
-Planning and Zoning Commission, March 1st Meeting
-No upcoming neighborhood meetings
ADJOURNMENT
MOTION:A motion was made by Commissioner Swope and seconded by
Commissioner Barrett to adjourn the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting at 8:20
PM.
MOTION carried, 6-0.
Attachment 5
1
Spaeth, Michael
From:stfatha@aol.com
Sent:Monday, September 01, 2014 11:27 AM
To:Spaeth, Michael; Vella, Bayer
Subject:P&Z - CUP
In thinking through the situations where the present criteria proved to be inadequate would be a better way to begin any
discussion.
:First, apartment development adjacent to single family. The language in a condition has to avoid "reasonably" compatible
or consistent. We have to be more explicit. In this example, both uses are residential. The current General Plan - in the
Housing element - refers to ( 7.2.1 ) "small apartments" ( 3-4 units ). Clearly nothing the Town has approved comes close
to this stipulation. So, the General Plan is in need for a serious revision within this element. I don't think "compatibility" is
the issue with apartments...it's the perception of the population that rents. I don't think our General Plan can or should
address that, but the design of apartments can be addressed, and the conditions within a CUP should convey that
specificity.
Basically, apartments should be designed for long term satisfaction; not short term. The example often used is executives
who have been re located to Oro Valley needs a short term place to live. That is the wrong premise. There need to be a
greater variety of apartment floor plans ranging up to 1800 sq. ft. & facilities to accommodate long term living needs; dry
cleaning, day care, fitness, food service.
:Secondly, fast food adjacent to residential. Unlike other convenience uses with drive through, fast food carries an
undesirable connotation. Design can address that, as with apartments.
:Thirdly, retirement living for the elderly adjacent to commercial. The elderly live where they have to - not want to. One of
the conditions for satisfaction is quiet. They may be hard of hearing, but they are over sensitive to congestion, traffic close
by. We don't require a minimum lot size for senior living and need to...it's one of my recommendations to Chad on that
ordinance. Elderly need space to walk slowly, quietly without feeling pressed or impatience from others. We are allowing
this use in shopping centers, in Innovation Park, close top busy thorough fares. Wrong.
I suggest the discussion be based upon those types of uses that have created difficulty.
: A Fry's gas station 100' or so from another gas station, is a fourth example. If we want every retail business to have an
opportunity for a prime location, we shouldn't be faced with a code that allows unspecified number of competitive
businesses in the same location.
: Finally, Drive Through use within a center planned as a specialty center,, such as the First & Oracle, Town Centre
development. As we all know, that piece of property was initially zoned for mixed use, "traditional neighborhood". The
owner persuaded the Town leadership to believe that mixed use had "no market", even though mixed use is common
throughout the country. We weren't prepared, and gave in. CUPs made no sense as originally zoned; became
unnecessary as ultimately re zoned.
Please forward this to the Commission prior to the discussion.
Bill Adler
Attachment 6
Town Council Regular Session Item # 7.
Meeting Date:03/02/2016
Requested by: Councilmember Zinkin & Councilmember Garner
Submitted By:Julie Bower, Town Clerk's Office
Department:Town Clerk's Office
Information
SUBJECT:
DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE DIRECTION TO STAFF TO PREPARE
A REPORT OUTLINING THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MAIN STREET AND YOUR
VOICE, OUR FUTURE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
RECOMMENDATION:
N/A
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Councilmember Zinkin and Councilmember Garner requested the item be placed on the
agenda for discussion.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE ________________________________________
Attachments
No file(s) attached.
Town Council Regular Session Item # 8.
Meeting Date:03/02/2016
Requested by: Councilmember Burns & Councilmember Zinkin
Submitted By:Julie Bower, Town Clerk's Office
Department:Town Clerk's Office
Information
SUBJECT:
DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE DIRECTION REGARDING THE INSTALLATION OF
ADDITIONAL SWINGS AT RIVERFRONT PARK
RECOMMENDATION:
N/A
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Councilmember Burns and Councilmember Zinkin have requested the item be placed on
the agenda for discussion.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to ______________________________
Attachments
No file(s) attached.