HomeMy WebLinkAboutPackets - Council Packets (25)FY 2016-2017
Police Department
Recommended Budget
April 27, 2016
1
OVPD’s Five Principles of Community Policing
Service
Accountability
Problem solving
Neighborhood focus
Decentralization
2
Town of Oro Valley Strategic Plan 2015
Fiscal Responsibility
Communication
Economic Development
Parks, Recreation and Cultural Development
Community Infrastructure and Services
3
Town of Oro Valley General Plan and Public Safety
Public safety remains a key component to the town’s general plan
Crime prevention
Community policing
High visibility
Safe roadways
Exceptional service
“Like a strong visible police department”
Unknown, 5 Questions in 5 Minutes Budget Survey, 2015
Minimal changes to PD budget, while still allowing ‘full service’ PD, to align with community expectations
4
Community vision, values and priorities
What do residents enjoy most about living in Oro Valley?
Safety/safe living
Crime free
“Oro Valley the Best Place in Arizona to Raise Kids”
Bloomberg Businessweek, 2013
5
Community vision, values and priorities
Public safety priorities:
School safety
High visibility
Crime prevention programs
Community preparedness
“Safe community; quality schools; physical beauty; family friendly”
Community Survey, 2013
6
Departmental approach
Provide a full service community policing organization
Emphasize community outreach and education geared toward crime prevention
Mitigation of the effects of increased traffic with emphasis on safety
Service readiness through staffing, training and technology
“I could never say enough good things about the OVPD.”
Katie Kuhn, OVPD Facebook page
R.A.D.
Senior abuse
HOA
Adopt-a-Business
Scam School
HiVE
On body cameras
7
Grants (CNA, DEA, HIDTA, Stonegarden, GOHS overtime and equipment, JTTF)
Anti-Racketeering funds utilized for backfilling three officers in task force assignments
Impound fees
Fingerprinting, report copying, etc.
Revenues and restricted funding sources
Revenues and restricted funding sources estimated to be $1,022,486
$478,284 Federal Grants
$236,063 State grants
$223,848 Anti-Racketeering funds
$40,000 Impound fees
$44,291 Fingerprinting, Report Copying, Pawn Slips, and other
Other (off-duty vehicle, destruct board cash and sales of destruct board items)
8
Fiscal year comparison
Personnel Svcs. increased $235,869 or 1.8%
O&M decreased $40,322 or -2%
Capital decreased $980 (IT) or -1.8%
Total department increase of $194,567 or 1.3%
9
Administration
Variances by program area
$62,675 increase in Administration O&M, in part due to:
Outside professional services
Travel and training
Insurance premiums
Electricity, gas and water at new Magee facility
$9,200 outside prof. Ret. Physical, associated costs
$19,700 T&T in an attempt to regain funding lost in previous FY
$18k insurance – no control
$$25,770 increase to cover electricity, gas and water at new Magee Road location (incl. waste disposal)
10
Support Services Capital and O&M
Variances by program area - continued
$48,997 reduction in the Support Services, in part due to:
$15,800 reduction in Property/ID
$125,000 reduction in gasoline
$24,078 reduction in IT O&M and Capital expenditures
$3,400 increase in Criminal Investigations
$95,066 increase in Fleet O&M for vehicle replacement and vehicle reserves
$14,100 increase for annual lease at Rancho Vistoso location (full year)
$3,400 for CIU interviews – based on actuals
Continued consolidations of IT software and minor assets
$14,100 full year lease
$15,800 reduction due to weapon mounted lights for replacement Glocks
11
CVAP volunteers have donated:
14,551 hours of service during 2015
247,576 hours since inception June, 1997
Police Explorers have donated:
1,767 hours during 2015
Continued volunteer support
Parks routinely request support from these groups that would otherwise be provided from a paid source
CVAP = 6.99 FTE’s Explorers = 0.85 FTE’s
According to the Corporation for National and Community Service, the estimated value of volunteer time for 2014 for Arizona is $22.37, or $325,505 (2015 hours based on 2014 value)
Included in the town’s strategic plan
Explorer hours 1,767 X 22.37 = $39,527.79
12
Conclusion
A safe community is a healthy community
“It's no wonder Oro Valley was at the top of our list.”
Movoto.com – 10 Safest Places in Arizona
13
14
Community Development
and Public Works
Department
FY 2016-17 Recommended Budget
April 27, 2016
Thank you Mayor & Council for the opportunity to present our department budget this afternoon.
First and foremost you will notice that through the budget process we are implementing a renaming of the department from the current Development and Infrastructure Services title to
Community Development and Public Works.
The reason for the renaming is to better convey the services we provide.
Frankly whenever I use development and infrastructure services or DIS to identify the department, it’s usually followed with an explanation of what we do.
By changing to commonly known & accepted naming conventions, we hope to better convey what our services are to the public
15
Community Development and Public Works
Planning
Permitting
Inspections and Compliance
Engineering – Const., Pavement, Signs, Signals, Striping
Operations – Street Maint., Facilities, Fleet, Parks Maint.
Stormwater – Regulatory Mgmt., Drainage Maint.
Transit
Community Development
Public Works
Strategic Plan
Communication
• Partner with other organizations and events to share information about Town services, programs,
departments, and events
16
Although we are suggesting a renaming of the department title, we are maintaining the existing organizational structure
Go through the list
Department Budget Summary
Strategic Plan
Fiscal Responsibility
• Determine return on investment, cost avoidance, applicability to general plan, and identify core services in determining capital infrastructure priorities, including town facilities.
This is an overview of the department’s proposed budget and the various funds we work within
Nearly 75% of our department’s $23.8M in expenditures, is covered with revenue generation and recovery from outside fees, grants and regional funding.
Expenditures as a whole is down by approximately 5% in the proposed budget.
This is mostly due to a slight reduction in roadway design & construction spending
17
Community Development Personnel
*
*Projected for year end 2016
Review of Staffing Levels against primary work
18
Public Works Personnel
19
Transit Personnel -FTE
20
Community Development Highlights
ADA Transition Plan
Public education of the Your Voice, Our Future Plan for the November 2016 vote
Continuation of the Main Street Project
Electronic Submittals
Permitting, Planning, Inspections & Compliance
Strategic Plan
Community Infrastructure and Services
• Improve processes to … encourage innovation, and implement new ideas.
• Manage assets through inventory such as sites, infrastructure, systems, etc.
21
Public Works Highlights
Transfer of Park Maintenance to Operations Division
Roadway & Community Enhancements Projects
Pavement Preservation
Lambert Lane Phase II Construction
La Cholla Design Completion
Tangerine Road Construction
La Cañada / Moore Intersection Safety Study
Library Parking Lot Expansion
Perimeter Wall, 680 Calle Concordia Facilities
Transit Services
Now supports over 40,000 annual riders
Growth is leveling out
Continue new vehicle replacement program
Grant request to enhance customer service notification
Pedestrian Safety
High-Intensity Activated crossWalK beacon (HAWK) – La Cañada
Magee Road sidewalk
Strategic Plan
Community Infrastructure and Services • Invest in Oro Valley transportation infrastructure …
• Continue and improve the pavement preservation program …
• Monitor, determine, and develop action strategies … for safety issues.
22
Budget Savings, Assumptions & Exclusions
YVOF Ratification
Project wrapped up in December if approved in November election
Electronic Submittals
Evaluate the functionality using in-house capabilities
Stormwater Utility Fee
Prepared under the existing fee rate structure
Gasoline
Captures savings of current lower pricing
Increased Field Maintenance
Does not include resources for additional fields to maintain
Strategic Plan
Fiscal Responsibility
• Determine return on investment and cost avoidance
23
Community Development & Public Works
Questions?
With that, I’d like to open up to questions
24
25
Department FTE & Expenditure Comparison
Reference Information
The following table is a comparison between the present budget and the proposed budget we are presenting this afternoon.
In looking at this table there are 3 areas that needed adjustment so we are comparing apples to apples.
Talk about asterisks
26
Transit Personnel - Employees
Reference Information
27
28
29
30
31
Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
FY 2016-17 Recommended Budget
April 27, 2016
I’m pleased to be presenting an overview of our Fiscal Year 16-17 proposed Capital Improvement Program, or CIP
As a reminder, full schedules of our entire 15-year CIP, as well as project descriptions for next year’s projects are included in the Recommended Budget document
32
FY 2016-17 Recommended CIP by Fund - $19,803,000
Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
This is our FY 16-17 recommended CIP budget by fund
-Our CIP projects are funded primarily with one-time revenues, and the projects that are brought forward and recommended in the budget tie to the elements in our adopted strategic plan
Walking through the funds and amounts, and then we’ll dive into some of the project details:
-At $9M or about 45% of the total CIP budget is the PAG/RTA Fund which accounts for our roadway widening projects that are reimbursed by the Pima Association of Governments (PAG)
or the Regional Transportation Authority (RTA)
-Related to that is the $2M in the Roadway Impact Fee Fund – this is our required match of $1M each on two PAG/RTA funded roadway projects (specifically Lambert Lane and Tangerine Road);
impact fees are already accumulated in the fund
So about 55% of the CIP budget tied to roadway widening projects, with $9M of that fully reimbursed with outside funding
-Water Utility Fund is the next largest, at about $3.3 million
-Gen Govt CIP Fund – $2.6 million
-HW Fund – $1.6M
-Community Center Fund – nearly $600K
-Other Funds: $622,000, and one particular project I want to mention that’s included in this amount is $187,000 for library parking lot enhancements (additional parking spots and lighting)
budgeted in the library impact fee fund ($150K of that project cost will be funded with a donation from the Friends of the Library and remaining will be covered with library impact
fees, which will exhaust the remainder of the balance in that fund)
33
General Government CIP Fund
FY 16/17 CIP – Notable Projects by Fund
Police evidence facility and southern substation building - $1,660,000
$960,000 General Fund transfer plus $700,000 rollover
$285,000 Police Impact Fee Fund
FY 17/18 and FY 18/19 - $600,000 each year to complete the project
Two additional multi-use fields at Naranja Park - $350,000
Two-year project
FY 16/17 funding sources - $250,000 P&R Impact Fee Fund; $100,000 Bed Tax Fund
FY 17/18 funding sources - $380,000 from General Fund
Second purchase payment for Community Center - $350,000
Aquatic Center Olympic pool heaters - $148,000
Going through by fund to touch on specific projects –
General Government CIP Fund:
-Our largest project in this fund is the Police evidence facility and southern substation bldg – property has been acquired; ribbon cutting was last month; the budget in the CIP Fund
is $1,660,000 which consists of $960K transfer from the General Fund plus rollover of $700,000. We also have an addl $285K budgeted in the Police Impact Fee Fund for FY 16/17. And just
to mention in FY’s 17/18 and 18/19 we have $600K planned in each of those years to complete this project
-Two additional multi-use fields at Naranja Park $350K; really pleased we were able to accommodate this project in the budget (two year project w/total cost of $730K; FY 16/17 funding
sources consists of $250K P&R impact fees and $100K bed tax fund and FY 17/18 balance of $380K from Gen Fund to complete the project
-Second purchase payment for our Community Center - $350K – this is the second on three payments, and just wanting to note that although Council approved use of contingency for this
purchase, so far we have not had to utilize those reserves at all and we do not anticipate having to utilize them for this second payment either
-We also have $148K in the CIP Fund to replace one currently malfunctioning heater in the Olympic Pool @ the Aquatic Center with two new heaters
34
Highway Fund
FY 16/17 CIP – Notable Projects by Fund
Pavement Preservation Program - $1,150,000
Tangerine access to Safeway (1st Ave) - $250,000
Includes funding of $70,000 from property owner
Rollover project from FY 15/16
Heavy equipment purchases - $175,000
Sweeper - $85,000
Skidsteer - $90,000
Moving on to the Highway Fund:
-bulk of the CIP budget in this fund is for our Pavement Preservation Program @ $1.15M
-Tangerine Access to Safeway @ 1st Ave - $250,000 – this is a rollover from the current fiscal year. The project is in state right-of-way, so it has been a longer process to get approval
for the project through the Arizona Department of Transportation. Funding includes use of highway funds as well as $70K which we are seeking to secure from the property owners to help
cover the project costs.
-Heavy equipment purchases of $175K - street sweeper $85K and $90K skidsteer to allow staff to perform maintenance on our multi-use paths and cart paths
35
PAG/RTA Fund
FY 16/17 CIP – Notable Projects by Fund
Widening of Lambert Lane, from La Cañada to La Cholla - $5,517,000 (PAG funds)
Widening of La Cholla Boulevard, from Lambert to Tangerine - $1,500,000 (RTA funds)
Widening of Tangerine Road, from La Cañada to Shannon - $1,710,000 (RTA funds)
Crosswalk Signal Installation (La Cañada @ CRC) - $250,000 (PAG funds)
Three major roadway projects planned in FY 16/17, funding is provided by the Pima Association of Governments (or PAG) and the Regional Transportation Authority (or RTA). We should all
be familiar with these three roadway projects:
Widening of Lambert Lane, from La Cañada to La Cholla – construction - $5,517,000 (PAG funds)
Widening of La Cholla Boulevard, from Lambert to Tangerine – design - $1,500,000 (RTA funds)
Widening of Tangerine Road, from La Cañada to Shannon – construction - $1,710,000 (RTA Funds)
-and as previously mentioned for Tangerine and Lambert, we also have $1M for each of those in the roadway impact fee fund that we are budgeting to spend in FY 16/17
We also have another PAG-funded project in this fund for next fiscal year – installation of high-intensity activated crosswalk signals on La Cañada at the Community Center, so just right
out here, to assist pedestrians in crossing the street - $250K
36
Community Center Fund
FY 16/17 CIP – Notable Projects by Fund
Elevator and redesigned entryway - $331,000
Tennis court improvements - $75,000
Family/youth game room - $65,000
Golf course improvements - $125,000
Irrigation pump rebuild - $75,000
Cart path improvements - $50,000
Community Center Fund – nearly $600K for a number of improvements, both on the Community Center side and golf side, which were also discussed at our April 13th study session:
-bulk is $331K for construction of an elevator and redesigned entryway for the Community Center to address ADA compliance
-tennis court improvements across the street $75K
-family/youth game room @ $65K which Ms. Diaz-Trahan discussed on the 13th, to provide space for the 9-14 year-old age group and families as well
-golf course improvements $75K pump rebuild and $50K for cart path improvements
37
Water Utility
FY 16/17 CIP – Notable Projects by Fund
Three main relocations in connection with planned roadway projects:
Lambert Lane - $600,000
Tangerine Road (reclaimed water) - $1,500,000
La Cholla Boulevard - $70,000 (design)
Other notable projects:
Well E-2 upgrade - $150,000
Re-coating and re-lining of two reservoirs - $200,000
Reclaimed water booster pump installation - $200,000
Alternative Water Resources Impact Fee Fund
Pressure-sustaining valve installation – CAP blending - $100,000
Moving on to the Water Utility – a significant portion of the CIP budget in the Water Utility Fund (about 2/3) is for main relocations that are planned in connection with our roadway
projects
-Lambert Lane $600,000
-Tangerine Road (reclaimed main) - $1,500,000
-La Cholla Boulevard - $70,000 (design)
Other notable projects include a Well E-2 upgrade (removal and replacement of a pumping unit to bring us up to desired pumping capacity at that facility); the re-coating and re-lining
of two reservoirs (Glover Rd more than 20 yrs old and Big Wash more than 15 yrs old); a reclaimed booster pump installation @ Thornydale booster station (second pump that serves as
backup in case primary pump fails); and finally next fiscal year we’ll have a capital project budgeted in one our Water Utility impact fee funds, this is our Alternative Water Rscs
Impact Fee Fund for Central Arizona Project (CAP) water projects, and we’ll be installing a pressure-sustaining valve and piping at the Naranja reservoir for CAP blending
38
Questions?
39
40