HomeMy WebLinkAboutPackets - Council Packets (62)Council Meeting
Regular Session
September 2, 2015
1
2
Town Council Meeting Announcements
3
Upcoming Meetings
4
5
6
Maracay at Vistoso
Block 5 Final Plat
Town Council
September 2, 2015
7
Town of Oro Valley
8
Vicinity Map
9
Block 5 Final Plat
Set boundaries for 47 lots
Match roadways to approved site plan design
Match site layout, golf course setbacks to approved site plan design
10
11
Eagles Rest
Final Plat
Town Council
September 2, 2015
Good evening Mayor members of the Council
Our purpose is…
Final Plat for Eagles Rest
12
Location
Moore Road
La Canada Dr
N
Subject
Property
Property is located…
13
Final Plat
Lots
Streets
Common Areas
Easements
Building Heights
75 lots
FP is consistent with the TDP approved as part of the rezoning last year.
Restricted building heights along the west (lots 1-13)
14
Site plan comparison
Approved TDP
Final Plat
15
16
Stone Canyon VIII
Final Plat
Blocks 1 thru 4
Town Council
September 2, 2015
Good evening Mayor members of the Council
Our purpose is…
Final Plat for Blocks 1-4.
17
Location
Property is located…
18
Final Plat
Blocks
4 blocks
19
20
Miller Ranch Rezoning
Town Council Meeting
September 2, 2015
Applicant’s Request
Rezoning to R1-7
ESL’s Modified Review Process
3-plus acre lots
3-plus acre lots
1-acre lots
Sunkist Road
Tangerine Road
La Cañada Drive
Our purpose tonight is to consider the Miller Ranch Rezoning of 16 acres located west of the northwest corner of Tangerine Road and La Canada Drive.
The applicant has two requests as follows:
First is the rezoning from the existing R1-144 zoning to R1-7 to provide for a 37 lot residential subdivision.
Secondly, the applicant requests approval of the use of one flexible design options enabled by the Town’s Environmentally Sensitive Lands section of the Zoning Code. The requested option
is the use of a modified review which I will cover later in my presentation.
22
Site Plan Revisions
Current Design
23
Compatibility
Lot size
Buffer
Livestock in area
Access
Concerns / Issues
Lots: 30
Size: 10K – 12K
Density: 1.84
24
Concerns / Issues
Mature Trees
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
View Conservation
ESL’s Modified Review Process
26
Public Participation – Miller Ranch Project
Neighborhood meetings: 6
Planning and Zoning Commission meetings: 3
Town Council meetings: 4
27
Protest Map
Approval requires a minimum three-fourths vote of the Town Council
28
Recommendation
Complies with General Plan Land Use Map
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends denial of a previous site plan design depicting 37 lots
Conditions of approval
The proposed homes shall be restricted to eighteen (18’) feet, 1-story as depicted in Exhibit “B-1.”
The applicant shall provide the following language in the deeds and future CC&R’s:
The Residences at Miller Ranch property described herein is subject to all adjacent Agricultural and Ranching Uses allowed within the existing zoning district, specifically to the sights,
sounds, smells, air quality, water use, animal use, hours of operation, etc., accompanying regular and customary agricultural and ranching uses now existing or which may exist in the
future in the Suburban Residential zone district. Property owners waive any claim for nuisance or otherwise arising from regular and customary agricultural and ranching operations.
Agricultural and ranching operations that are consistent with sound agricultural and ranching practices are declared reasonable and shall not constitute a nuisance. Agricultural and
ranching operations that are in conformity with federal, state and local laws and regulations are presumed to be operating within sound agricultural and ranching practices.
Conditions of Approval
R1-7 Development Standards
Setbacks: 20’ Front, 7.5’ Side and 20’ Rear
Building height: 25’, two-stories
Lot width: 70’
Site Plan Revisions
40-45 lots
7K – 10K
37 lots
8K – 10K
30 lots
10K – 12K
20 lots
9K – 10K
May 19, 2015
Neighborhood Meeting
March 4, 2015 Town Council Meeting
2014 General Plan Amendment Case
July 1, 2015 Town Council Meeting
Site Plan Design Changes
33
Protest Map
Rezoning Boundary
100%
Criteria
For each side
Measure 150’ from rezoning boundary
Find protest area outside applicant’s property
Determine 20% protest area received
Three-fourths vote requirement for an approval
34
2014 Major General Plan Amendment
40-45 lots
37 lots
March 4, 2015 Town Council Meeting
35
30 lots
20 lots
May 19, 2015 Neighborhood Meeting
July 1, 2015 Town Council Meeting
36
General Plan Amendment
Proposed Rezoning
Lot size transition
40 – 45 lots
10,000 sq. ft.
7,000 sq. ft.
Density: 2.5 homes per acre cap
Lot size transition
30 lots
10,000 sq. ft.
12,500 sq. ft.
Density: 1.84 homes per acre
37
Sunkist Road
La Cañada Drive
Tangerine Road
La Cañada Drive
Sunkist Road
39
Primary Issues
Planning and Zoning Commission
Traffic / Access
View preservation
Project’s compatibility with rural lots
3-plus acre lots, R1-144
3-plus acre lots, SR
1 acre lots, R1-36 and R1-20
10K sq. ft. lots, R1-7 and R1-10
5K sq. ft. lots, R-6 and R-4
La Cañada Drive
Tangerine Road
3/4 acre lots, R1-36
In addition to the neighborhood meeting held in conjunction with the general plan amendment in 2013, the applicant conducted two neighborhood meetings for the proposed rezoning:
-July 28th
-October 29th
Input Received:
-Traffic / Access
-Building Height
-Compatibility
-Drainage
40
R-4
R-6
Tangerine Road
La Cañada Drive
Sunkist Road
Pima County SR
41
Environmentally Sensitive Lands
95% Open Space
(Critical Resource Area)
25% Open Space
(RMA Tier 2)
La Cañada Drive
Tangerine Road
43
The Residences at Miller Ranch | Oro Valley
Rezoning Application
Town Council Hearing | 9.2.2015
44
Miller Ranch | Existing Conditions
45
Miller Ranch | Neighborhood Meeting Summary
Rezoning Neighborhood Meetings
July 28, 2014
October 29, 2014
May 19, 2015
Rezoning Neighborhood Meetings Discussion Points
Access
Compatibility
Viewshed
Drainage
Existing Adjacent Uses
46
Miller Ranch | Approved GP Amendment
General Plan Amendment:
General Plan Designation
Medium Density Residential
Proposed Residential Program
Proposed: 40 Lots / 2.5 RAC
Proposed Lot Size:
West Side: Min. 10,000 SF
East Side: Min. 7,000 SF
Approved by Mayor & Council
Approved 6-1 on February 5, 2014
Max. Residential Density 2.5 RAC
47
Miller Ranch | Previous Rezoning TDP Plan
Tentative Development Plan:
Proposed Residential Program
Proposed: 38 Lots
Gross Density: 2.3 RAC
Proposed Lot Size:
West Side: Min. 10,000 SF
East Side: Min. 7,200 SF
Access from La Canada
Emergency Access to Sunkist Road
48
Miller Ranch | Previous Rezoning TDP Plan
Tentative Development Plan:
Proposed Residential Program
Proposed: 37 Lots
Gross Density: 2.3 RAC
Proposed Lot Size:
West Side: Min. 10,000 SF
East Side: Min. 8,000 SF
Access from Sunkist Road / Improved Sunkist Road
One Story Restriction for West Lots
One/Two Story Restriction for East Lots
Increased Landscape Buffer along the Northern and Western Edge
49
Miller Ranch | Residential Master Plan
Area: 16.3 AC
General Plan Designation:
Medium Density Residential
Rezoning Summary
Existing Zoning: R1-144
Proposed Zoning: R1-7
Access
Primary Access: Direct Access from La Canada
Open Space / Common Area
Total Open Space: 6.4AC – 39% of the Site
ESL Critical Resource Area (CRA)
95% Open Space Requirement
Enhance the Wash Corridor
Approx 3.4AC
ESL Tier 2 Resource Management Area (RMA)
Approx 1.6AC
Wash Restoration Credit 1.5AC
Common Area / Streetscape Area
Approx 1.4AC
Proposed Residential Development
Minimum Lot Size: 12,500SF & 10,000SF
Total Lots: 30 Lots
Gross Density: 1.8 RAC (28% Reduction)
50
Miller Ranch | Planning Elements
Land Use
Environmental Sensitive Land Ordinance (ELSO)
Integration of open space balanced by reasonable development
Wash requires 95% preservation
Development Density
1.8 RAC – i.e. Low Density Residential
2.5 RAC - Maximum Density per the General Plan Amendment
Access
Primary Access: Direct Access from La Canada
Full access intersection at La Canada Drive
Access through Miller Ranch Tech Park
No Sunkist Road Access
No Emergency Access to Sunkist Road
Buffers & Landscape Enhancement
Enhancement of the wash
Increased screening of the west and north buffer
Additional mature trees in the buffer
Understanding of existing agricultural and ranching operations on adjacent properties
51
Miller Ranch | Planning Elements
Viewshed
Western lots limited to one story homes
One story homes adjacent to Sunkist Road
One story homes for southern lots adjacent to the existing residence
Community Amenities
Small active and passive spaces
Trail connection to the future trail along the eastern edge of the wash
Links to the commercial area & Tangerine Road
Sidewalk connection (one side of access road) to La Canada
Drainage
Conform to Oro Valley requirements with no additional flow leaving the property
Wash restoration will improve the flow of the wash in previously disturbed or altered areas
52
Miller Ranch | Development Patterns
Development Patterns
Diversity of residential densities in the vicinity
Town Council approved a MDR (2.1-5.0 RAC) General Plan designation with a maximum allowable density of 2.5 RAC
MDR - Medium-Density Residential is where single-family detached, townhouse, or patio home development is suitable. These areas should be located close to schools, shopping, and employment.
(Excerpt from the General Plan)
Current Residential Mix:
3% - Under 4,500 SF
32% - 4,500 – 6,500 SF
15% - 6,500 – 8,500 SF
13% - 8,500 – 11,000 SF
36% - 11,000+ SF
53
Average Density - MDR
Miller Ranch | Development Patterns
Tangerine Heights
Miller Ranch
Desert Sky
Rancho Vistoso
N10 Parcel A
(Recently Approved in
Rancho Vistoso PAD)
54
Miller Ranch | Planning Transition
Traditional planning strategies support a development transition from a rural pattern to sub-urban to urban pattern such as the Technology Park and Commercial Center. The transect highlights
the development transition from the rural zone to the low density range of the sub-urban zone.
Conform to the Oro Valley Residential Design Standards ensuring the implementation of a quality community.
Conform to the ESLO Critical Resource Area and open space requirements.
Source: Duany Plater-Zyberk & Company (DPZ)
“Of all the neighborhood areas, density is least in the sub-urban zone, ranging from 2 to 8 units per acre.” Placemakers
“The sub-urban zone is most similar to the areas on the outskirts of town where the town grid begins to give way to nature.” Placemakers
55
Miller Ranch | Viewshed Study – View 1
Existing
Proposed
View 1
56
Miller Ranch | Viewshed Study – View 2
Existing
Proposed
View 2
57
Miller Ranch | Viewshed Study – View 3
Existing
Proposed
View 3
58
Miller Ranch | Viewshed Study – View 4
Existing
Proposed
View 4
59
Miller Ranch | Viewshed Study – View 5
Existing
Proposed
View 5
60
Miller Ranch | Viewshed Study – View 6
Existing
Proposed
View 6
61
Miller Ranch | Viewshed Study – View 7
Existing
Proposed
View 7
62
Miller Ranch | Economic Impact
Economic Benefits for Oro Valley
Supports: Tax Base, Employment Goals & Commercial Development
Residential Development
Estimated Building Permits:
$6,000 - $7,500 per Home / Overall Development: $180,000 – $225,000
Estimate Construction Sales Tax:
$10,500 - $14,000 per Home / Overall Development: $315,000 – $420,000
Estimate Development Impact Fees:
$3,156 per Home / Overall Development: $94,680
Total Estimated Impact
$19,656 - $24,656 per Home / Overall Development: $589,680 – $739,680
Typical Household Spending in Oro Valley
Average household contributes $378/year in taxes to Oro Valley based on the Oro Valley 2014/2015 Budget
Residences at Miller Ranch: +/-$11,340 per Year / Over 10 Years: +/-$114,000
63
Miller Ranch | Comment Resolution
Access
Access only from La Canada Drive
No access (no emergency access) from Sunkist Road
No Impact to adjacent property owners
Compatibility
Residential transition to Commercial and Tech Campus / Key development node on Tangerine Road
Current plan is restricted to Low Density Residential (1.8 RAC / Larger Lots)
Viewshed
Minimize visual impacts by limiting the location of 2 story homes
Increase landscape along the northern and western boundary
Maintain existing views to the west
Drainage
No impact to adjacent properties (per Oro Valley Code)
Existing Adjacent Uses
Condition to include an understanding of existing uses on adjacent properties to run with the property
64
Miller Ranch | Rezoning Overview
The Residences at Miller Ranch Rezoning Summary
R1-7 with 30 lots at 1.8 RAC (Low Density Residential)
Western Lots – Min. 12,500 SF / One Story Restriction
Eastern Lots – Min. 10,000 SF / One & Two Story Restriction
Flexible Design Option
Modified Review Process
Primary Access from La Canada through the Miller Ranch Tech Park
No Access or Improvements to Sunkist Road
Staff supports the rezoning / Conforms to approved GP Amendment
Conforms with the General Plan Elements, Goals and Policies
Land Use - Community Design
Economic Development - Cost of Development
Transportation & Circulation - Housing
Public Facilities, Services & Safety - Parks and Recreation
Archaeological & Cultural Resources - Water Resources
Open Space & Natural Resource Conservation - Environmental Planning
65
Questions
Thank you
Stacey Weaks | Norris Design
sweaks@norris-design.com | 520.622.9565
66
Miller Ranch | Approved Development Plan
Miller Ranch | Commercial & Technology Park
General Plan Amendment Approved in 2004
Rezoning Approved in 2007
Development Plan Approved in 2010
67
Miller Ranch | Residential Access
68
69
Kneaders Café and Bakery
Conceptual Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Architecture
September 2nd Town Council
70
Proposal
Site and Landscape Plan
Architecture
71
Location
Apartments
Kneaders
Desert Sky
Oracle Road
Linda Vista
72
Overall El Corredor Site Plan
Oracle Road
Linda Vista
The Canyons at Linda Vista Trail Apartments
73
Conceptual Site Plan / Landscape Plan
Screening of drive thru
Traffic circulation
Outdoor dining area
Oracle Road
74
El Corredor Landscape Plan
Oracle Road
Kneaders Site
75
Conceptual Architecture
Varied roof and wall planes
Variation in materials
Stone wainscot
Defined cornice
Meets Design Principles and Design Standards
76
Public Participation
Neighborhood Meeting held with 10 residents in attendance
Comments focused on deliveries and questions with apartments under construction
No adverse comments have been received
77
Conforms with Design Principles and Design Standards
Approve with the conditions listed in Attachment 1
Recommendation
78
79
80
81
82
KNEADERS OF ORO VALLEY
83
84
85
86
87
88
Questions
89
90
Pima Federal Credit Union
Conceptual Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Architecture
Town Council
September 2, 2015
91
Proposal
Architecture
Site and Landscape Plan
Good evening Mr. Mayor and Council
Our Purpose this evening is to discuss:
Site Plan
Landscape
Architecture
for Pima Federal Credit Union…
92
Oracle Road
Basis
This is the entire Steam Pump Village:
Encantada Apts on the north
Here is our site on the south
Basis near the center
PAD also includes amenities such as
Park
Bus Stop
66 Park and Ride spaces, exceeding the requirement of the PAD
Trails
COA on left turn lanes, ensure const complete prior to issuance of C of O
93
Site Plan
Oracle Road
Existing access, parking
Graded pad
Enhanced paved area/ped connectivity to park
<< Click for site plan>>
The Site Plan depicts:
Building 4,080 square feet Credit Union
1,700 square foot courtyard
Drive thru
Note:
Drive thru (banks are not considered a convenience use based upon PAD), no CUP required
94
Landscape Plan
Site provides connectivity to the Park
Landscape buffers the Park from the rear of the building
Condition related to landscaping along drive thru
Oracle Road
Site Plan
Existing access, parking
Graded pad
Enhanced paved area/ped connectivity to park
<< Click for site plan>>
The Site Plan depicts:
Building 4,080 square feet Credit Union
1,700 square foot courtyard
Drive thru
COA on landscaping, and there are additional…
Note:
Drive thru (banks are not considered a convenience use based upon PAD), no CUP required
The Landscape plan shows:
Sidewalks-ped connection to park/trail
Screening from Park
Compatible with surroundings
Note:
No turf
95
Conditions of Approval- Sidewalk/Street
Dual left turn lanes
In-lieu fee for sidewalk
Oracle Road
The Steam Pump Village Shopping Center as a whole requires an additional left turn lane on Oracle. The proposed project includes conditions tying this project to the additional turn
lane
A condition is included requiring an in lieu fee for the future construction of a sidewalk along Oracle Road
The final condition is to ensure appropriate screening is provided adjacent to the drive thru
96
Architecture
East Elevation
West Elevation
As previously mentioned…
Steam Pump Ranch had influence in the architecture of the existing and proposed developments… Features such
Metal barn style roofing
Slumpstone
Period architectural lighting
4 sided architectural treatment
are incorporated into the design. The site has been laid out that closer to Steam Pump, more ranch style, and more modern as you move north.
Notes:
26’ 6” max, 39’ allowed by PAD
QT, building 22’ canopy 19.5’
97
Surrounding Architecture Features
Exiting buildings incorporated Elements such as
Metal barn roof
Exposed wood under patio over hangs
Stack stone
Slump stone
Metal columns
Trellises
98
Town Design Principles and Standards
Steam Pump Village Planned Area Development standards
CDRB recommends approval, with the conditions listed in Attachment 1
Recommendation
Project consistent with the Planned Area Development Standards
Conforms to Steam Pump Village Planned Development standards
That concludes my remarks, I would like to turn it over to the applicant.
99
100
East/west elevations
101
Location
Oracle Road
Site is located at 11025 N. Oracle Road, south Steam Pump Way
Quick Trip
Baggins
The site is also adjacent to Steam Pump Ranch, which influences the architecture as we will discuss later
102
Steam Pump Village Planned Area Development
Oracle Road
This is the entire Steam Pump Village:
Encantada Apts on the north
Here is our site on the south
Basis near the center
PAD also includes amenities such as
Park
Bus Stop
66 Park and Ride spaces, exceeding the requirement of the PAD
Trails
COA on left turn lanes, ensure const complete prior to issuance of C of O
103
Zoning
104
105
106
PIMA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
VALUE PROMISE
107
WHO WE ARE
108
PIMA FCU
STEAM PUMP VILLAGE
EXISTING
109
STEAM PUMP VILLAGE
11025 N ORACLE RD
BIRDSEYE VIEW
110
11025 N ORACLE RD
BIRDSEYE VIEW
111
STEAM PUMP VILLAGE
11025 N. Oracle Road
Baggins
QT
Park
112
11025 N ORACLE RD
STREET VIEW
113
11025 N ORACLE RD
FROM BAGGINS
114
11025 N ORACLE RD
BEHIND QT
115
11025 N ORACLE RD
BAGGINS BUILDING
116
11025 N ORACLE RD
QT BUILDING
117
11025 N ORACLE RD
VIEW FROM BUILDING
118
EXISTING
MATERIALS
119
EXISTING Steam Pump PALETTE
120
PROPOSED
MATERIALS
121
PROPOSED Steam Pump PALETTE
122
PIMA FCU
STEAM PUMP VILLAGE
APPROVED PLANS
123
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
124
PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN
125
PROPOSED ELEVATIONS
126
PROPOSED ELEVATIONS
127
PROPOSED SECTION
128
PROPOSED SITE SECTION
129
PIMA FCU
STEAM PUMP VILLAGE
APPROVED EXTERIOR
RENDERINGS
130
PROPOSED RENDERING 1
131
PROPOSED RENDERING 2
132
PIMA FCU
STEAM PUMP VILLAGE
APPROVED INTERIOR
RENDERINGS
133
WELCOME & ENGAGE
134
RELAX & DISCOVER
135
MOUNTAIN VIEWS
136
PROPOSED ‘COMING SOON’ SIGN
137
138
139
San Dorado, Shops F
Conceptual Architecture and Landscape Plan
Town Council
September 2, 2015
140
Proposal
Landscape Plan
Architecture
Good evening Mr. Mayor and Council members
Our Purpose this evening is to discuss the Conceptual Architecture, including Landscape for San Dorado Building F
The site plan has been previously approved
141
Location
San Dorado Planned Area Development
First Avenue
Oracle Road
Site is located at 10556 N. Oracle Road, south of North First Avenue
In the San Dorado PAD which includes CVS
Across from Fry’s and Target
Existing landscaping south of site, along Oracle and northeast corner
Existing drive/access
Trail
Future Pad
142
Landscape Plan
Future Shops
Oracle Road
Shops F
Rooney Wash
The Landscape plan includes:
The CDRB saw a similar plan showing a loading zone
Plan was revised by the applicant reducing building square footage to eliminating the Code requirement for a loading zone
Plantings include Palo Verde, Mesquite and Ocotillo, among others
COA to comply w/ Town Code (Plant type placement)
Landscaping already provided adjacent to Oracle, south of site
Note: building was 6,000
Now 4,999
143
North and South Elevations
(Facing Parking Lot)
Similar features incorporated into the design
Features from surrounding buildings:
Arches
Stone
Colors
Cornice
26’ height to highest point, max 40’ allowed by PAD
Height varies from 24’ 8” to 26’
CVS is 30’ and other retail buildings same height
144
East and West Elevations
(Facing Oracle Road)
145
Surrounding Architecture Features
Elements incorporated such as:
Columns
Slump stone
Trellises
146
147
Town Design Principles and Standards
San Dorado Planned Area Development Standards
CDRB recommends approval, with the conditions listed in Attachment 1
Recommendation
As conditioned, the project conforms with the Design Principles and Standards
Project consistent with the San Dorado Planned Area Development Standards
That concludes my remarks, I would like to turn it over to the applicant.
148
Old North/South Elevations
149
Old East/west elevations
150
Aerial View of Site
Oracle Road
Closer look at site…
Existing landscaping south of site, along Oracle and northeast corner
Existing drive/access
Trail
Future Pad
151
Old Landscape Plan
Shops F
Future
Oracle Road
152
San Dorado Planned Area Development
Oracle Road
153
Zoning
154
155
San Dorado Shops F
Town Council Hearing
September 2, 2015
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
Compare Architectural Elevations between the completed Shops B & C, to the proposed Shops F
163
Shops F Proposed Front Elevation
Shops B
Shops C
164
Shops F Proposed Side Elevation
Shops B
Shops C
165
Shops F Proposed Side Elevation
Shops B
Shops C
166
Shops F Proposed Rear Elevation
Shops B
Shops D
167
168
Thank You
169
Previously Approved Site Plan
170
Previously Approved Site Plan
171
Revised Site Plan
172
173
174
175
176