HomeMy WebLinkAboutPackets - Council Packets (67)Council Meeting
Regular Session
July 1, 2015
1
2
Town Council Meeting Announcements
3
Upcoming Meetings
4
Upcoming Meetings
5
6
7
Steam Pump Ranch
8
9
Miller Ranch Rezoning
Town Council Meeting
July 1, 2015
Applicant’s Request
Rezoning from R1-144 to R1-7, includes ESL’s Modified Review Process
Background
2014: General Plan Amendment
2015: Rezoning
February – Planning and Zoning Commission
March – Town Council
3-plus acre lots
3-plus acre lots
1 acre lots
Sunkist Road
Tangerine Road
La Cañada Drive
Our purpose tonight is to consider the Miller Ranch Rezoning of 16 acres located west of the northwest corner of Tangerine Road and La Canada Drive.
The applicant has two requests as follows:
First is the rezoning from the existing R1-144 zoning to R1-7 to provide for a 37 lot residential subdivision.
Secondly, the applicant requests approval of the use of one flexible design options enabled by the Town’s Environmentally Sensitive Lands section of the Zoning Code. The requested option
is the use of a modified review which I will cover later in my presentation.
11
Access
Compatibility
Lot size
Buffer
Livestock in area
View conservation
Concerns / Issues
12
Proposed Site Plan Revisions
Former Site Plan
New Site Plan
R1-7
R1-144
R1-144
One-story Restriction
14
Site Plan Design Changes
R1-7
R1-144
R1-144
15
ESL’s Modified Review Process
16
Protest Map
Three-fourths vote requirement with all Town Council present for an approval
17
Recommendation
Complies with General Plan Land Use Map
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends denial of a previous site plan design depicting 37 lots
Conditions of approval
The proposed homes shall be restricted to eighteen (18’) feet, 1-story as depicted in Exhibit “B-1.”
The applicant shall provide the following language in the deeds and future CC&R’s:
The Residences at Miller Ranch property described herein is subject to all adjacent Agricultural and Ranching Uses allowed within the existing zoning district, specifically to the sights,
sounds, smells, air quality, water use, animal use, hours of operation, etc., accompanying regular and customary agricultural and ranching uses now existing or which may exist in the
future in the Suburban Residential zone district. Property owners waive any claim for nuisance or otherwise arising from regular and customary agricultural and ranching operations.
Agricultural and ranching operations that are consistent with sound agricultural and ranching practices are declared reasonable and shall not constitute a nuisance. Agricultural and
ranching operations that are in conformity with federal, state and local laws and regulations are presumed to be operating within sound agricultural and ranching practices.
Conditions of Approval
Protest Map
Rezoning Boundary
100%
Criteria
For each side
Measure 150’ from rezoning boundary
Find protest area outside applicant’s property
Determine 20% protest area received
Three-fourths vote requirement for an approval
20
21
2014 Major General Plan Amendment
40-45 lots
37 lots
March 4, 2015 Town Council Meeting
22
30 lots
20 lots
May 19, 2015 Neighborhood Meeting
July 1, 2015 Town Council Meeting
23
R1-7 Development Standards
Setbacks: 20’ Front, 7.5’ Side and 20’ Rear
Building height: 25’, two-stories
Lot width: 70’
General Plan Amendment
Proposed Rezoning
Lot size transition
40 – 45 lots
10,000 sq. ft.
7,000 sq. ft.
Density: 2.5 homes per acre cap
Lot size transition
20 lots
9,000 to 10,000 sq. ft.
Density: 2.1 homes per acre
25
Primary Issues
Planning and Zoning Commission
Traffic / Access
View preservation
Project’s compatibility with rural lots
3-plus acre lots, R1-144
3-plus acre lots, SR
1 acre lots, R1-36 and R1-20
10K sq. ft. lots, R1-7 and R1-10
5K sq. ft. lots, R-6 and R-4
La Cañada Drive
Tangerine Road
3/4 acre lots, R1-36
In addition to the neighborhood meeting held in conjunction with the general plan amendment in 2013, the applicant conducted two neighborhood meetings for the proposed rezoning:
-July 28th
-October 29th
Input Received:
-Traffic / Access
-Building Height
-Compatibility
-Drainage
26
Sunkist Road
La Cañada Drive
R-4
R-6
Tangerine Road
La Cañada Drive
Sunkist Road
Pima County SR
28
Environmentally Sensitive Lands
95% Open Space
(Critical Resource Area)
25% Open Space
(RMA Tier 2)
La Cañada Drive
Tangerine Road
30
St Mark Catholic Church
Revised Rezoning Conditions
Town Council
July 1, 2015
31
Applicant’s Request
Revised rezoning conditions
Eliminate southern screen wall
Increase height of light poles near southern boundary
Thank you Mayor, members of Town Council
Our purpose tonight is to consider St Mark Catholic Church’s request to revise the several zoning conditions which were established several years ago in conjunction with the development
of the church.
Specifically, the applicant requests revision in two areas:
First, the applicant requests to eliminate the screen wall which exists on the southern boundary of the developed church property.
Second the applicant requests to increase the height of light poles on this southern boundary
32
Location
Tangerine Road
Shannon Road
The church is located on the southeast corner of Tangerine and Shannon roads
The existing church property is shown outlined in black
The location of the subject screen wall and light poles is shown circled in yellow
During the rezoning of the property, the then property owner of the 12 acres to the south (white outline) was involved and had concerns with regard to the impact on his property
As a result, several conditions were imposed which were intended to mitigate the impact on this southern property.
Subsequently, the church purchased the property and the pastor now resides in the home to the south.
33
Wall and Light Pole Location
Zooming in a little on that area.
The white dashed lines represent a new parking area the church desires to build to provide convenient parking to the main sanctuary to the north.
As a result, the applicant proposes to remove the wall and allow taller light poles to provide a safely illuminated parking area.
The location of the wall is shown in black lines.
The yellow dots represent where the applicant would like to increase the height of light poles from 8 feet to 10 feet.
The blue dots represent where the applicant would like to increase the height of light poles from 10 feet to 18 feet.
The applicant indicates the basis for the request is the change in ownership of the parcel to the south by the church, making the conditions unecessary
34
Recommendation
Conditions have changed supporting the amendments
Conforms to the Zoning Code
Recommend approval
Staff has reviewed the request and agree that the conditions are no longer necessary based on the change in ownership
The requested height of light poles has been reviewed and conforms to the Zoning Code.
Staff recommends approval of the request.
35
36
PAD Amendment to Remove Conditions of Zoning
Requirement for Site Walls
Height Restriction to Site Lighting
Town Council Agenda July 1, 2015
37
Aerial View of St. Mark Catholic Church Properties
Church – Office – Social Hall - Rectory
Office
Hall
Church
Rectory
38
St. Mark Concessions During 2012 Rezoning
Included:
Design & Placement of Site Walls along south Property Line
Restrictions to Lighting Heights south of the Church
St. Mark now owns Property to the South
Currently being used as Rectory
Parish Growth = 320 Families (35% increase)
From start of construction in Spring 2012 to Present Day
Need for Additional Parking due to Growth
New parking south of Church will add 40 spaces
Removal of the site walls built with Ph. 1 is necessary to achieve new parking
Need for Additional Lighting at New Parking
New Light Poles to Match Existing Style & Height are necessary to meet OV standards
Creates a safely lit parking & drive lane
39
Zoning Conditions to be Removed Include:
Original Conditions #s 1 & 10
Remove this Restriction to Light Pole Heights South of Church
Allows Lighting to be designed & installed per OV Outdoor Lighting Code
Original Conditions #s 11 & 12
Remove this Requirement for specific Design, Layout & Height of Site Walls along
the South Property Line to allow for New Parking to be built in close proximity to the Church
40
Existing Site Lighting along the South Parking & Drive Lane
no illumination in drive lane creates unsafe conditions
parking row is dimly lit
Proposed Site Lighting & New Parking along the South Drive Lane
creates safe conditions for parking & driving lane
designed to meet OV Outdoor Lighting Code
drive lane maintains minimum .2 lumens
Blue shaded areas represent illuminated areas of .4 lumens & above
41
42
Kneaders – Conditional Use Permit
Town Council
July 1, 2015
43
Applicant’s Request
Proposed restaurant with drive-thru
Requires Conditional Use Permit
Thank you Mr. Chair, members of Town Council
Our purpose tonight is to consider a Conditional Use Permit for a drive-thru for the Kneaders Bakery and Café.
The property is zoned Planned Area Development which requires a Conditional Use Permit to allow the drive thru.
44
Location
Apartments
Linda Vista Blvd
Oracle Rd
Desert Sky Rd
Kneaders
45
Conceptual Site Plan
Screening of drive thru
Traffic circulation
Oracle Road
46
Recommendation
Complies with zoning review criteria
Noise, odor, dust, vibration or illumination
Explosion, contamination, fire or flood
Unusual volume or character of traffic
Reasonably compatible with type of uses in surrounding area
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval
Based on compliance with the review criteria, staff is recommending approval of the request.
I’ll now turn it over to the applicant for their presentation. Thanks
47
Overall Concept Plan
48
Landscape Plan
49
50
51
Oro Valley
July 1, 2015
Presented by: Ross Rulney
Contents
What is Kneaders………….Slides 1-3
Overview of Site………….Slides 4-8
Drive-Thru Info………….Slides 9-16
CUP Compliance……..Slides 17-19
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Drive-thru Information
For our Average Store…
25-30% of our Sales are from drive-thru service
Estimated # of Tickets through drive-thru:
Breakfast – 20-30
Lunch – 100 <
Dinner – 40-50
This site in Oro Valley can expect to be at or below average until brand recognition is strengthened.
61
We use HME’s EOS|HD drive-thru system
This site in Oro Valley can expect to be at or below average until brand recognition is strengthened.
62
(Screen-shot from our product manual)
It comes with the AVC setting control.
This site in Oro Valley can expect to be at or below average until brand recognition is strengthened.
63
Menu Board
For our Average Store…
25-30% of our Sales are from drive-thru service
# of Tickets through drive-thru:
Breakfast – 20-30
Lunch – 100 <
Dinner – 40-50
This site in Oro Valley can expect to be at or below average until brand recognition is strengthened.
64
Menu Board
For our Average Store…
25-30% of our Sales are from drive-thru service
# of Tickets through drive-thru:
Breakfast – 20-30
Lunch – 100 <
Dinner – 40-50
Example from another store
This site in Oro Valley can expect to be at or below average until brand recognition is strengthened.
65
Signs
For our Average Store…
25-30% of our Sales are from drive-thru service
# of Tickets through drive-thru:
Breakfast – 20-30
Lunch – 100 <
Dinner – 40-50
This site in Oro Valley can expect to be at or below average until brand recognition is strengthened.
66
Signs
For our Average Store…
25-30% of our Sales are from drive-thru service
# of Tickets through drive-thru:
Breakfast – 20-30
Lunch – 100 <
Dinner – 40-50
This site in Oro Valley can expect to be at or below average until brand recognition is strengthened.
67
Staff Report, ATTACHMENT 7
The Conditional Use Permit Review evaluation criteria contained in Section 22.5 provide the primary guidance for evaluating CUP’s. CUP’s may be granted based on consideration of the
following criteria…., followed by staff commentary:
That the Granting of such conditional use permit will not be materially detrimental to public health, safety, or welfare. In arriving at this determination, the factors which shall be
considered shall include the following:
Damage or nuisance arising from noise, odor, dust, vibration or illumination;
Per the staff report, Attachment 7, “the proposed use meets this criteria.”
Hazard to persons and property from possible explosion, contamination, fire or flood;
Building will have sprinklers and adhere to OSHA standards. Per the staff report, Attachment 7, “the proposed use meets this criteria.”
This site in Oro Valley can expect to be at or below average until brand recognition is strengthened.
68
Hazard occasioned by unusual volume or character of traffic;
Queuing will allow for 4-5 cars from menu, and ample turning room. Adjustments have been made to the site plan per planning staff comments. Per staff conversations, pedestrian walk
is being improved and no loading zone will be required. Per the staff report, Attachment 7, “This overall site plan has been reviewed by planning and engineering staff, with no adverse
comment relative to vehicular traffic flow.”
That the characteristics of the use proposed in such use permit are reasonably compatible with types of uses permitted in the surrounding area.
Per the staff report, Attachment 7, “Oracle road frontage is an appropriate location for commercial type uses, including drive-thru restaurants. Neighboring properties to the north,
south and west along Oracle Road are zoned and intended for neighborhood commercial uses. ….The applicant’s proposal is consistent with this criteria.”
Staff Report, ATTACHMENT 7
This site in Oro Valley can expect to be at or below average until brand recognition is strengthened.
69
Questions
70
71
El Corredor
Planned Area Development Amendment
Town Council
July 1, 2015
72
Applicant’s Request
Planned Area Development Amendment
Increase commercial area building height
Oracle Road
Linda Vista Blvd
This should be familiar. It deals with the same property as the previous case.
The PAD provides for two different land uses, apartments on the eastern 2/3 of the site and commercial on the western 1/3 along Oracle Road.
73
Proposed Building Heights
Zoning Code
Oracle Road Scenic Corridor Overlay District
25 feet
C-1 Zoning District
25 feet
Apartments
Commercial
27.5’
25’
Desert Sky Road
Oracle Road
Linda Vista Blvd
74
Current Building Heights
Apartments
Commercial
27.5’
28’
18’
Desert Sky Road
Oracle Road
Linda Vista Blvd
75
Recommendation
Based on conformance with:
C-1 zoning district
Other properties along Oracle Road
Oracle Road Scenic Corridor Overlay District
Recommend approval of the request
The request was reviewed and conforms with the C-1 zoning district, which is the underlying designation in the PAD.
The 25 foot building height is consistent with other commercial areas along Oracle Road
And finally, the request is consistent with the Oracle Road Scenic Corridor Overlay District.
Based on these findings, we are recommending approval of the request.
76
Landscape Plan
77
78
Mattamy Homes Minor General Plan and Planned Area Development Amendment
Town Council
July 1, 2015
79
Thank you Mayor, members of Council
Our purpose for this item is to consider Applicant’s request for…
Minor General Plan Amendment; and
PAD Amendment
Applicant’s Request
Minor General Plan Amendment
Open space trade
Recreation area
PAD Amendment
Open space trade
Recreation area
The two applications have the same two components
4.2-acre Open space trade
Revision to a recreation area condition regarding a 6.9-acre RV NH.5 park
Mr. Mayor, please note 2 separate motions will be required
80
Proposed Open Space Trade
1st component of both amendments…Open space trade
Trade is for:
4.2-acres to be traded from open space to residential…disturbed (blue)
In exchange for:
4.2-acres to be traded from residential to open space…primarily undisturbed (yellow)
Additionally, the trade will result in better defined OS edge + more contiguous OS
81
Proposed Recreation Area Condition Modification
2009 Major General Plan Amendment
Modification to timing requirement for park construction
New Site
Moore Road
Rancho Vistoso Blvd.
2nd Component of both amendments…revision to rec area condition
MGPA (2009) affected much of RV NH. 5 (black)
- Associated condition related to development of 6.9-acre park (black star)
Previous Moore Road alignment made the site convenient
New Moore Road alignment = much less accessible
Staff has worked with applicant to identify a new location along Moore road loop that is more accessible; and
The applicant has committed to build “fair share” of future park
82
Proposed Recreation Area Condition Modification
Town of Oro Valley
Timing
Phasing
Mattamy
Proposals
Moore Road
Rancho Vistoso Blvd.
1
2
Revision is regarding the TIMING of the development of the park.
1. Timing
will be associated with Mattamy’s proposed 2nd development for Parcels G,K,V. A Master Recreation Plan must be reviewed and approved by PRAB & TC in conjunction with the CSP.
2. Phasing
Mattamy will construct their “fair share” for what is essentially Phase 1 & future development for Phase 2
83
Summary and Recommendation
Neighborhood Meetings
Planning and Zoning Commission
General Plan Amendment Criteria
General Plan Vision, Goals and Policies
Rancho Vistoso PAD
Meets the original intent of the Recreation area condition
Recommend approval to Town Council
Separate motions required for General Plan Amendment and PAD Amendment.
Neighborhood Meetings: 2 meetings,
PZC considered application
Open Space Trade
- Meets GP Amendment Criteria; and
- Conforms with GP Vision, Goals and Policies
- RV PAD
Recreation Condition
- Meets the Original Intent
PZC Recommend approval to Town Council
84
Open Space Trade - Minor General Plan Amendment
Town of Oro Valley
Minor General Plan Amendment
Trading 4.2-acres (MDR) for 4.2-acres Open Space
Resulting in a better defined edge and more contiguous open space
85
Open Space Trade - PAD Amendment
Town of Oro Valley
PAD Amendment
Trading 4.2-acres (HDR) for 4.2-acres Open Space
Resulting in better defined edge and more contiguous open space
86
Review
General Plan Amendment Criteria
Open Space conservation
Neighborhood Compatibility
Town of Oro Valley
Amendment Criteria
General Plan Vision, Goals and Policies
Specifically, with a focus on Open Space preservation and neighborhood compatibility
Two neighborhood meetings have been held:
- generally supportive
- more focused on Conceptual Site Plan concerns.
87
88
Mattamy Homes
Conceptual Site and Landscape Plan
Town Council
July 1, 2015
Thank you Mayor, members of the Council
89
Applicant’s Request
Conceptual Site Plan
Conceptual Landscape Plan
Our purpose for this item is to consider Applicant’s proposed...
Conceptual Site Plan; and
Conceptual Landscape Plan
90
Conceptual Site Plan
Town of Oro Valley
Property: 48-acres
119 single-family lots
Internal and external sidewalks
Regional trail connections
Recreation area contribution
Property: 48-acres
Lots- 119 attached single-family lots (3-6)
Internal/external sidewalks connecting to M/U path on Moore
Trails connecting to regional trails within Honey Bee Wash a& Big Wash
Providing performance bond toward future NH. 5 park.
91
Summary and Recommendation
Neighborhood meetings
Conceptual Design Review Board
General Plan
Rancho Vistoso Design Standards
Zoning Code.
Recommends approval with the conditions listed in Attachment 1.
Town of Oro Valley
Neighborhood Meetings: 2 meetings
CDRB
Proposal consistent with:
General Plan
Rancho Vistoso PAD
Zoning Code
CDRB recommends approval….with conditions listed in Attachment 1.
92
Conditions of Approval
Planning Conditions
Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 5 park contribution
Engineering Conditions
The Moore Road cross-section shall include a 16’ wide raised median.
Town of Oro Valley
93
General Plan Map
Town of Oro Valley
94
Zoning Map
Town of Oro Valley
95
Conceptual Landscape Plan
Consistent landscaping along RV Boulevard
Landscaping in all common areas and front yards
Landscaped entries w/ ingress/egress separated by landscape islands
Trails within linear common areas
Regional trail connections
96
97
Kai South
Conceptual Site and Landscape Plan
Town Council
July 1, 2015
Thank you Mayor, members of Council
98
Applicant’s Request
Conceptual Site Plan
Conceptual Landscape Plan
Our purpose for this item is to consider Applicant’s proposed...
Conceptual Site Plan; and
Conceptual Landscape Plan
For the property located at…
99
Conceptual Site Plan
Town of Oro Valley
Property: 131 acres
44 single-family lots
Sidewalks connecting to multi-use path on Palisades Road
Regional trail connections
Property: 131 acres
Lots: 44 single family utilizing a conservation subdivision design: lots ranging in size from 17,800 sq. ft. to over an acre in size.
Sidewalks connecting to the planned multi-use path on north side of Palisades
Trail connections (yellow), including equestrian trail, leading to the north/south trail in the CDO wash area that continues further to the north and south and provides for regional
connectivity.
Very similar to what was represented during neighborhood meetings.
100
Environmentally Sensitive Lands
Town of Oro Valley
67% total Environmentally Sensitive Open Space
Hillside
Flexible Design Options (Administrative Approval)
Building Height
Minimum Lot Size
Building Setbacks (internal)
Native Vegetation
Applicant “opted in” to ESL requirements.
As a result of the CSD, total of 67% as ESOS
Significant topographical constraints…CSP respects these areas w/limited encroachment for roadways/utilities
Flexible design options approved administratively:
- building height (5ft)
- Minimum lot size reduction
- Building setbacks (internal)
- Native Vegetation Preservation
101
Summary and Recommendation
Neighborhood meetings
Conceptual Design Review Board
General Plan
Kai-Capri Special Area Policies
Zoning Code
Recommends approval with the conditions listed in Attachment 1
Town of Oro Valley
Neighborhood meetings – numerous in conjunction w/ Kai (North)
CDRB found request is in conformance w/
- General Plan
- Kai-Capri Special Area Policies
- Zoning Code
CDRB recommends approval….with revised conditions in attachment 1.
102
Previous Design
103
Flexible Design Options
Building height
18ft → 23ft
Minimum lot size
Building setbacks (internal)
Front: 50ft → 40ft
Side: 20ft → 16ft
Rear: 50ft → 40ft
Native vegetation preservation
Any property that provides 25% or more eligible..
Building height: 18’ to 23’
Minimum lot size: 67%
Building setbacks (internal): 20% reduction of…
Native Vegetation Preservation: w/in development envelope when 50% or more is preserved. No for DV or other endangered/threatened…like saguaros.
104
General Plan Map
Town of Oro Valley
105
Zoning Map
Town of Oro Valley
106
Conceptual Landscape Plan
Regional Trail Connection
Equestrian Trail Connection
Landscaped entries w/ ingress/egress separated by landscaping
Internal trails within linear common areas
Regional trail network connections
107
108
Parcel 10A in Rancho Vistoso
Conceptual Site Plan and Landscape Plan
Town Council Meeting
July 1, 2015
109
Applicant’s Request
Conceptual Site Plan and Landscape Plan
Total lots: 29
Property size: approximately 20-acres
Minimum lot size: 14,520 sf.
La Cañada Drive
110
Town of Oro Valley
Moore Road
La Cañada Drive
Secondary Runway
La Cholla Airpark
Rancho Vistoso
Kingair Drive
Main Runway
111
Site Plan features:
29 lots
Minimum lot size: 14,520 sf.
100’ wide buffer yard
Conservation easements
Internal sidewalks and trails
Landscape entryway and basins
Airport Environ Zone Overlay District
Runway
La Cañada Drive
Kingair Drive
112
Summary and Recommendation
Neighborhood meeting
Conforms with design review principles and standards
The Conceptual Design Review Board recommends approval
La Cañada Drive
113
Town of Oro Valley
A
B
C
D
C
C
114
Conical Use Zones per AEZ
115
Airport Environ Zone – Height Provision
116
Conservation Easements
117
118
Town of Oro Valley
Moore Road
La Canada Drive
R1-300
119
Low Density Residential Development Standards
Density: 1 to 3 DUA
Minimum Lot Size: 14,520 sq. ft.
Building Setbacks: 20’ Front, 8’ Sides and 25’ Rear
Building Height: 30’, two-stories
120
121
PARCEL 10A
CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN
OV1214-35
TOWN COUNCIL HEARING
7/1/2015
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
Stone Canyon VIII
Conceptual Site and Landscape Plan
Town Council
July 1, 2015
Thank you Mayor, members of the Council
129
Applicant’s Request
Conceptual Site Plan
Conceptual Landscape Plan
Our purpose for this item is to consider the applicant’s proposed...
Conceptual Site Plan; and
Conceptual Landscape Plan
130
Conceptual Site Plan
Property Size: 51 acres
38 single-family lots
Maximum building envelopes
Protected rock outcrops
Open Space: 51%
Town of Oro Valley
Property: 51-acres
Lots: 38 lots
Building Envelopes: max 16,000 sq. ft.
Significant features: avoids/conserves
Total OS: 51% open space
131
Summary and Recommendation
Neighborhood meetings
Conceptual Design Review Board
General Plan
Rancho Vistoso Design Standards
Zoning Code
Recommends approval with the conditions listed in Attachment 1.
Town of Oro Valley
Neighborhood Meetings
CDRB
- consistent with General Plan
- Rancho Vistoso Design Standards
- Zoning Code
CDRB recommends approval….with revised conditions in attachment 1.
132
Conceptual Landscape Plan
133
General Plan Map
Town of Oro Valley
134
Zoning Map
Town of Oro Valley
135
Tentative Development Plan
Open space preservation
Maximum number of units
Maximum building envelopes
Subject Property
TDP – 1999 (Pima County)
Established
- open space preservation requirement
- maximum number of units
- maximum building envelopes
Rancho Vistoso Hillside Development Standards
Areas outside building envelope preserved as permanent open space
136
Building envelopes
137
138
PARCEL 5F
CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN
OV1214-31
TOWN COUNCIL HEARING
7/1/2015
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
NEARBY RECREATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
Hohokam Park
Honey Bee Park
Onsite Rec Area
Honey Bee Preserve
Woodshade Park
Big Wash, Honey Bee Wash, and Connections to Regional Trail System
Future Neighborhood 5 Park
146
147
THE SANCTUARY AT SILVERHAWKE
CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN
OV1214-07
TOWN COUNCIL HEARING
7/1/2015
148
Preservation of CRA
Buffering of Existing Homes
Public Equestrian / Pedestrian Trails
Open Space along First Ave. & Existing Homes
Preservation of Ridges
Entry Gate
Fewer Homes Accessing Palisades
67% Open Space
149
Spanish Colonial
Ranch Territorial
Pueblo
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
PHASE VIII-B
CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN
OV1214-21
TOWN COUNCIL HEARING
7/1/2015
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165