Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPackets - Council Packets (102)         AGENDA  ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION March 18, 2015 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CAÑADA DRIVE         REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 5:00 PM   CALL TO ORDER   ROLL CALL   EXECUTIVE SESSION -  Pursuant to ARS 38-431.03(A)(1), 38-431.03(A)(3) and 38-431.03(A)(4) in order to receive legal advice and consider its position and instruct the Town Attorney regarding the Town’s position in pending litigation relating to communications about the El Conquistador Country Club purchase, contract negotiations regarding same and pending litigation involving Arrett & Lamonna v. Oro Valley and Merens filing   REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM   CALL TO ORDER   ROLL CALL   PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE   UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS   COUNCIL REPORTS      •   Spotlight on Youth   DEPARTMENT REPORTS   The Mayor and Council may consider and/or take action on the items listed below: ORDER OF BUSINESS: MAYOR WILL REVIEW THE ORDER OF THE MEETING   CALL TO AUDIENCE – At this time, any member of the public is allowed to address the Mayor and Town Council on any issue not listed on today’s agenda. Pursuant to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, individual Council Members may ask Town Staff to review the matter, ask that the matter be placed on a future agenda, or respond to criticism made by speakers. However, the Mayor and Council may not discuss or take legal action on matters raised during “Call to Audience.” In order to speak during “Call to Audience” please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card.              CONSENT AGENDA  (Consideration and/or possible action)   A. Minutes - March 4, 2015   B. Fiscal Year 2014/15 Financial Update through January 2015   C. Request for approval of a Final Plat for Block 3 of the Maracay at Vistoso subdivision, located on the northwest corner of the Pebble Creek Drive and La Cañada Drive intersection   D. Resolution No. (R)15-21, approving a financial participation agreement between the Town of Oro Valley and the Children's Museum Oro Valley   E. Resolution No. (R)15-22, revision to the Stone Canyon II Final Plat for Lot 167 located at 1063 W. Tortolita Mountain Circle within Rancho Vistoso, Neighborhood 11, by removing a portion of the designated "no-build area" and allowing encroachment into 25% or greater slopes with appropriate mitigation as enabled in the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development (Attachment #1 updated on 3/13/15)   F. Resolution No. (R)15-23, authorizing and approving an archery Shooting Range Development Grant Agreement between the Arizona Game & Fish Department and the Town of Oro Valley in the amount of $5,000 for the purchase of materials to construct a shade canopy at the Naranja Park archery range   REGULAR AGENDA   1. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN, LANDSCAPE PLAN, AND USE OF THE RECREATION AREA IN-LIEU FEE OPTION FOR A 3-LOT SUBDIVISION LOCATED NORTH OF DESERT SKY ROAD, APPROXIMATELY ONE-QUARTER MILE WEST OF ORACLE ROAD   2. RESOLUTION NO. (R)15-24, APPROVING A ONE-TIME PAYMENT TO THE ARIZONA PUBLIC SAFETY PERSONNEL RETIREMENT SYSTEM (PSPRS) TO ADDRESS THE INCREASING UNFUNDED LIABILITY OF THE PLAN   3. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE DIRECTION REGARDING TOPICS FOR A FUTURE STUDY SESSION ON SENIOR CARE USES   FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS  (The Council may bring forth general topics for future meeting agendas. Council may not discuss, deliberate or take any action on the topics presented pursuant to ARS 38-431.02H)   CALL TO AUDIENCE – At this time, any member of the public is allowed to address the Mayor and Town Council on any issue not listed on today’s agenda. Pursuant to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, individual Council Members may ask Town Staff to review the matter, ask that the matter be placed on a future agenda, or respond to criticism made by speakers. However, the Mayor and Council may not discuss or take legal action on matters raised during “Call to Audience.” In order to speak during “Call to Audience” please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card.   ADJOURNMENT      POSTED:  3/11/15 at 5:00 p.m. by mrs When possible, a packet of agenda materials as listed above is available for public inspection at least 24 hours prior to the Council meeting in the office of the Town Clerk between the hours of 8:00 a.m. – 5:00p.m. The Town of Oro Valley complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If any person with a disability needs any type of accommodation, please notify the Town Clerk’s Office at least five days prior to the Council meeting at 229-4700.   INSTRUCTIONS TO SPEAKERS Members of the public have the right to speak during any posted public hearing. However, those items not listed as a public hearing are for consideration and action by the Town Council during the course of their business meeting. Members of the public may be allowed to speak on these topics at the discretion of the Chair. If you wish to address the Town Council on any item(s) on this agenda, please complete a speaker card located on the Agenda table at the back of the room and give it to the Town Clerk. Please indicate on the speaker card which item number and topic you wish to speak on, or if you wish to speak during “Call to Audience”, please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. Please step forward to the podium when the Mayor announces the item(s) on the agenda which you are interested in addressing. 1. For the record, please state your name and whether or not you are a Town resident. 2. Speak only on the issue currently being discussed by Council. Please organize your speech, you will only be allowed to address the Council once regarding the topic being discussed. 3. Please limit your comments to 3 minutes. 4. During “Call to Audience” you may address the Council on any issue you wish. 5. Any member of the public speaking must speak in a courteous and respectful manner to those present. Thank you for your cooperation.    Town Council Regular Session Item # A. Meeting Date:03/18/2015   Requested by: Julie Bower Submitted By:Mike Standish, Town Clerk's Office Department:Town Clerk's Office Information SUBJECT: Minutes - March 4, 2015 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: N/A BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: N/A SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to (approve, approve with the following changes) the March 4, 2015 minutes. Attachments 3/4/15 Draft Minutes 3/4/15 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 1 MINUTES ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION March 4, 2015 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 5:00 PM CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hiremath called the meeting to order at 5:05 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT:Satish Hiremath, Mayor Lou Waters, Vice Mayor Brendan Burns, Councilmember (Arrived at 5:15 p.m.) Bill Garner, Councilmember Joe Hornat, Councilmember Mary Snider, Councilmember Mike Zinkin, Councilmember EXECUTIVE SESSION - Pursuant to ARS 38-431.03(A)(3) and 38-431.03(A)(4) in order to receive legal advice, consider its position and instruct its attorneys regarding the Arrett/Lamonna litigation MOTION:A motion was made by Vice Mayor Waters and seconded by Councilmember Zinkin to go into Executive Session at 5:06 p.m. pursuant to ARS 38-431.03(A)(3) and 38-431(A)(4) in order to receive legal advice, consider its position and instruct its attorneys regarding the Arrett/Lamonna litigation. MOTION carried, 6-0. Mayor Hiremath said the following staff members would join Council in Executive Session: Town Manager Greg Caton, Town Attorneys Kelly Schwab and Patricia Ronan, Legal Services Director Tobin Sidles and Town Clerk Julie Bower. REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hiremath called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL 3/4/15 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 2 PRESENT:Satish Hiremath, Mayor Lou Waters, Vice Mayor Brendan Burns, Councilmember Bill Garner, Councilmember Joe Hornat, Councilmember Mary Snider, Councilmember Mike Zinkin, Councilmember PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Boy Scout Troop #222 led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS Communications Administrator Misti Nowak announced the upcoming Town meetings and events. COUNCIL REPORTS No reports were received. DEPARTMENT REPORTS Town Clerk Julie Bower announced that new artwork was on display in the Council Chambers by artist Jan Sennewald. ORDER OF BUSINESS Mayor Hiremath said Regular Agenda item #5 would be heard before item #4. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 1.Letter of Appreciation - Oro Valley Police Department CALL TO AUDIENCE Oro Valley resident Richard Tracy read an anonymous letter in which the author supported the proposed recreational/community center project. Dave Perry, President and CEO of the Greater Oro Valley Chamber of Commerce and Oro Valley resident spoke in support of the acquisition of the El Conquistador Country Club and .5% sales tax increase to fund the project. 3/4/15 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 3 CONSENT AGENDA Vice Mayor Waters requested to remove item (C) from the Consent Agenda for discussion. Councilmember Zinkin requested to remove item (B) from the Consent Agenda for discussion. Councilmember Hornat requested to remove item (A) from the Consent Agenda for discussion. D.Resolution No. (R)15-18, authorizing and approving a subgrantee agreement between the Town of Oro Valley and the Arizona Department of Homeland Security to fund the purchase of equipment under the Operation Stonegarden program E.Resolution No. (R)15-19, authorizing and approving Town of Oro Valley projects under consideration for inclusion in a future Pima County general obligation bond election MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Zinkin and seconded by Councilmember Garner to approve Consent Agenda items (D) and (E). MOTION carried, 7-0. A.Minutes -February 18, 2015 Councilmember Hornat requested to amend the February 18, 2015 minutes by including his response to criticism regarding Coyote Run during the Call to Audience. MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Hornat and seconded by Vice Mayor Waters to approve the February 18, 2015 minutes with the following addition under the Call to Audience: Councilmember Hornat said Coyote Run was reinstituted by Council under a new name and was three times more successful than it ever had been and served a large number of residents in the community both over and under sixty-five years old. Councilmember Hornat said the Center that was closed across the street from Town Hall served a very small group of people, a community center would serve thousands. MOTION carried, 7-0. B.Request for approval of a final plat for Block 4 of the Maracay at Vistoso subdivision, located northeast of the intersection of Pebble Creek Drive and La Canada Drive 3/4/15 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 4 Councilmember Zinkin referenced General Note #9 and asked if zero (0) feet side setbacks would be allowed. Planner Rosevelt Arellano said the zoning would allow zero (0) feet side setbacks but as of today, all of the model homes had been approved for the site and none of them utilized the zero (0) feet side setback. MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Zinkin and seconded by Councilmember Hornat to approve item (B). MOTION carried, 7-0. C.Resolution No. (R)15-17, authorizing and approving an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) between the City of Phoenix Police Department and the Town of Oro Valley Police Department for the Arizona Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force Vice Mayor Waters asked what the Town's part would be in the proposed Task Force. Sergeant Dean Nesbitt said the Task Force was a national network of 61 coordinated Task Forces representing more than 3,500 federal, state and local law enforcement agencies. These agencies were engaged in both proactive and reactive investigations, forensic examination and criminal prosecution. By helping state and local agencies develop effective, sustainable responses to online child victimization, including response to child sexual abuse, the program had increased law enforcement's capacity to combat the technology facilitated crimes against children at every level. The program was also dedicated to training law enforcement officers and prosecutors as well as educating parents and youths about the potential dangers of online activity. Sergeant Nesbitt encouraged parents and guardians to monitor what their kids were doing on the internet and their phones to help mitigate this problem. MOTION:A motion was made by Vice Mayor Waters and seconded by Councilmember Snider to approve Resolution No. (R)15-17, authorizing and approving an intergovernmental agreement between the City of Phoenix Police Department and the Town of Oro Valley Police Department for the Arizona Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force. MOTION carried, 7-0. REGULAR AGENDA 1.FISCAL YEAR 2014/15 MID-YEAR FINANCIAL UPDATE Finance Director Stacey Lemos presented item #1 and gave an overview of the following: 3/4/15 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 5 -General Fund Revenues & Expenditures -Highway Fund Revenues & Expenditures -Bed Tax Fund and Stormwater Utility Fund -Water Utility Fund Discussion ensued amongst Council and staff regarding the FY 2014/15 mid-year financial update. 2.DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE APPROVAL OF A REVISED MASTER SIGN PROGRAM FOR THE ORO VALLEY MARKETPLACE TO ALLOW WALL SIGNS ON BUILDING ELEVATIONS FACING ORACLE AND TANGERINE ROADS Senior Planner Patty Hayes presented item #2 and outlined the following: -Proposal -Business Visibility -Sign Location -Proposed Sign Size -Signs Facing Major Roads -Visibility from Adjacent Properties & View Corridor -Recommendation -Conditions for Approval Discussion ensued amongst Council and staff regarding the proposed Revised Master Sign program for the Oro Valley Marketplace. David Malin, representative for Vestar Development Company, spoke on the proposed Revised Master Sign program. Paul Bleier, representative for Bleier Industries, spoke about the types of signs that could be placed on buildings facing Oracle and Tangerine Roads, if approved. The following individuals spoke on item #2. Oro Valley resident Don Bristow The following individuals spoke in support of item #2. Oro Valley resident Terry Parish Oro Valley resident Wendy Wise Dave Perry, President and CEO of the Greater Oro Valley Chamber of Commerce and Oro Valley resident The following individual spoke in opposition to item #2. 3/4/15 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 6 Oro Valley resident Bill Adler MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Hornat and seconded by Mayor Hiremath to approve the revised Master Sign Program for the Oro Valley Marketplace as provided in Attachment 2, based on finding that it is consistent with the Zoning Code and General Plan with the additional conditions that the lamp color temperature shall not exceed 4400K or the in effect standard that is adopted by the Town and the sign size shall be regulated by the Oro Valley Zoning Code standards. Discussion resumed amongst Council and staff regarding the proposed revised Master Sign Program. MOTION carried, 4-3 with Councilmember Burns, Councilmember Garner, and Councilmember Zinkin opposed. Mayor Hiremath recessed the meeting at 7:52 p.m. Mayor Hiremath reconvened the meeting at 7:59 p.m. 3.PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE NO. (O)15-07, REZONING 16.3 ACRES NEAR THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LA CAÑADA DRIVE AND TANGERINE ROAD FROM R1-144 TO R1-7 AND APPROVING ONE ESL FLEXIBLE DESIGN OPTION FOR A MODIFIED REVIEW PROCESS Planner Rosevelt Arellano presented item #3 and outlined the following: -Site Location -Access Map -Neighborhood Participation -ESL's Flexible Design Option -Planning and Zoning Commission Issues Discussion ensued amongst Council and staff regarding the proposed rezoning. Stacey Weeks, representative for Norris Design, presented item #3 and outlined the following: -General Plan Amendment -Rezoning Application -Development Patterns -Residential Master Plan -Planning Elements -Viewshed Study -Economic Impact -Rezoning Overview 3/4/15 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 7 Discussion ensued amongst Council and Mr. Weeks regarding the proposed rezoning request. Mayor Hiremath opened the public hearing. The following individuals spoke in opposition to item #3. Susann Duperret Greg Patchen Pat McGowan Oro Valley resident Bill Adler Sarah McGowan Oro Valley resident Adelina Kempner Amber Peterman Hank Winter Dr. Chuck Boreson Mayor Hiremath closed the public hearing. Discussion ensued amongst Council regarding the proposed rezoning. MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Zinkin and seconded by Councilmember Garner to deny Ordinance No. (O)15-07, finding that the proposed rezoning is not consistent with the General Plan due to the lack of compatibility with surrounding areas. MOTION failed, 2-5 with Mayor Hiremath, Vice Mayor Waters, Councilmember Burns, Councilmember Hornat, and Councilmember Snider opposed. MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Burns and seconded by Councilmember Snider to continue item #3 to the June 17, 2015 regular Council meeting. MOTION carried, 5-2 with Councilmember Garner and Councilmember Zinkin opposed. 5.RESOLUTION NO. (R)15-20, AMENDING THE EXISTING PARKS & RECREATION FEE SCHEDULE TO INCLUDE THE ORO VALLEY COMMUNITY & RECREATION CENTER AND EL CONQUISTADOR GOLF DAILY USAGE FEES Parks and Recreation Director Kristy Diaz-Trahan presented item #5 and outlined the following: -Facility Overview -Rate Development -Daily Rate Comparable 3/4/15 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 8 -Daily Rate Recommendations Discussion ensued amongst Council and staff regarding item #5. Scott Van Newkirk, Senior Vice President of Global Business Development for Troon, spoke about online golf rates. The following individual spoke in support of item #5. Oro Valley resident Betty Danker MOTION:A motion was made by Vice Mayor Waters and seconded by Councilmember Snider to approve Resolution No. (R)15-20, approving the Oro Valley Community & Recreation Center and El Conquistador Golf daily rates as presented. Councilmember Burns requested an amendment to the motion to stipulate that Oro Valley resident rates shall not be less than 10% but may be more than 10% of the best published rate at the point of reservation. Vice Mayor Waters and Councilmember Snider agreed to the amendment. MOTION AS AMENDED carried, 7-0. 4.DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION TO AMEND THE FY 2014/15 ADOPTED BUDGET TO ACCOUNT FOR THE NEW ORO VALLEY COMMUNITY AND RECREATION CENTER AND GOLF AND TENNIS OPERATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THE ACQUISITION OF THE EL CONQUISTADOR COUNTRY CLUB AND GOLF COURSES Ms. Lemos presented item #4 and outlined the following: -Overview -Budget Amendment -Operating Details -Capital Improvements The following individuals spoke in support of item #4. Oro Valley resident Dick Johnson Oro Valley resident John Andersen Oro Valley resident Lyra Done Discussion ensued amongst Council and staff regarding item #4. MOTION:A motion was made by Vice Mayor Waters and seconded by Councilmember Snider to amend the FY 2014/15 adopted budget to transfer $1.2 million from General Fund contingency reserves to the new Community Center and Golf Fund and authorize 3/4/15 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 9 the hiring of the Facility Manager position this fiscal year and to repay the loan to the General Fund contingency reserve fund over ten years. MOTION carried, 4-0 with Councilmember Burns, Councilmember Garner, and Councilmember Zinkin abstaining. 6.DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE DIRECTION REGARDING THE PROCESS OF SETTING USER FEES FOR THE ORO VALLEY PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT Councilmember Garner presented item #6. Discussion ensued amongst Council and staff regarding item #6. Council directed staff to place any fee structure changes in the Council Forward. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Councilmember Snider requested a future agenda item to consider a student art program, seconded by Vice Mayor Waters. CALL TO AUDIENCE No comments were received. ADJOURNMENT MOTION:A motion was made by Vice Mayor Waters and seconded by Councilmember Snider to adjourn the meeting at 10:44 p.m. MOTION carried, 7-0. Prepared by: ___________________________ Michael Standish, CMC Deputy Town Clerk I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the regular session of the Town of Oro Valley Council of Oro Valley, Arizona held on the 4th day of March, 2015. I further certify that the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present. Dated this _____ day of ________________________, 2015. ______________________________ Julie K. Bower, MMC Town Clerk Town Council Regular Session Item # B. Meeting Date:03/18/2015   Requested by: Stacey Lemos Submitted By:Wendy Gomez, Finance Department:Finance Information SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2014/15 Financial Update through January 2015 RECOMMENDATION: This item is for information only. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: In the General Fund (see attachment A), revenues collected through January totaled $17.6 million or 54.7% of the budget amount of $32.3 million. Year-to-date expenditures through January totaled $17.5 million or 54.0% of the budget amount of $32.5 million. The adopted FY 2014/15 General Fund budget included a transfer out of one-time revenues in the amount of $2.5 million to the General Government CIP Fund for capital projects. Please note that year-to-date expenditures now include approximately one-third of this budgeted transfer out to the General Government CIP Fund of approximately $883,000. In the Highway Fund (see attachment B), revenues collected through January totaled $1.7 million or 58.3% of the budget amount of $3.0 million. Year-to-date expenditures through January totaled $1.8 million or 42.2% of the budget amount of $4.4 million. It is important to note that the Highway Fund budget includes the planned use of $1.4 million in reserves, as all construction sales tax revenues are now fully accounted for in the General Fund. In the Bed Tax Fund (see attachment C), revenues collected through January totaled $453,455 or 47.8% of the budget amount of $949,000. Year-to-date expenditures through January totaled $483,247 or 50.3% of the budget amount of $961,000. BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: GENERAL FUND Attachment A shows General Fund revenues and expenditures through January, as well as year-end estimates for each category. The estimated year-end projections in the General Fund are as follows: Revenues                                                    $31,578,788 Less: Expenditures                                              ($31,756,195) Est. Decrease in Fund Balance                   ($  177,407) General Fund Revenues Local sales tax collections in the General Fund total $8.5 million or 54.3% of the budget amount of $15.7 million. Sales tax collections in the General Fund are estimated to come in below budget by approximately $314,000 or 2.0% based on current collections-to-date trending slightly below budgeted levels. Please see Attachment E for a monthly tracking of General Fund local sales tax collections, including construction and utility sales tax.   License and permit revenues are estimated to come in under budget by about $317,000 or 17.6% due primarily to single family residential (SFR) permitting trends. A total of 135 SFR permits are projected for FY 14/15, compared to the 200 that were budgeted.  Federal grant revenues are estimated to come in over budget by about $65,000 or 10.9% due to grant funds received for a Police DUI Tahoe and hosting of collision investigation training classes funded by the Governor's Office of Highway Safety. State Grant revenues are estimated to come in under budget by about $185,000 or 11.5%. Of this amount, $105,000 reflects RTA reimbursements for Transit, which corresponds to estimated expenditure savings. Capacity of $75,000 was placed in the budget for potential funding of a new school resource officer and is not expected to be utilized this fiscal year. Corresponding personnel savings of $75,000 are included in the Police Department's year-end estimated expenditures.     Charges for Services revenues are estimated to come in over budget by about $105,000 or 6.3% due to revenue trends at the Aquatic Center, zoning & subdivision fees and user fee revenues for field and court rentals.   Fine revenues are estimated to come in under budget by $60,000 or 33.3% based on current trends and citation filings.  Staff will continue to monitor revenue collections and may adjust the year-end estimates based on actual trends. General Fund Expenditures Expenditures are estimated to come in under budget by approximately $700,000 or 2.2% due primarily to projected operations and maintenance (O&M) savings by departments, as well as projected personnel vacancy savings. Due to the observed slowdown in revenue collections, with a considerable amount classified as one-time, the estimated transfer to the General Government CIP Fund for one-time capital projects has been reduced by $120,000. This will not affect current year budgeted projects, but rather the banking of funds for the future PD Property ID and Substation Building. The timeline on this project is likely to be extended out further, as efforts on securing a building location are still underway.             HIGHWAY FUND Highway Fund Revenues State shared highway user revenue funds (HURF) total $1.6 million or 57.7% of the budget amount of $2.8 million. Highway Fund revenues in total are expected to come in over budget by about $140,000 or 4.7% due primarily to HURF revenues.  These revenues are up more than 8% over last fiscal year due to economic growth and Senate Bill 1487, which allocated additional monies to HURF for FY 14/15. The year-end estimate for HURF revenues was provided by the League of Arizona Cities & Towns. Highway Fund Expenditures Expenditures are estimated to come in on budget at this time. BED TAX FUND Bed Tax Revenues Bed tax revenues total $449,135 or 47.5% of the budget amount of $945,000 and are estimated to come in on budget at this time. Bed Tax Fund Expenditures Expenditures are estimated to come in on budget at this time. Please see Attachments A, B, and C for additional details on the General Fund, Highway Fund and Bed Tax Fund respectively. See Attachment D for a fiscal year-to-date consolidated summary of all Town funds. In addition, as noted earlier, Attachment E includes a breakdown of monthly local sales tax collections for the General Fund. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A SUGGESTED MOTION: This item is for information only. Attachments Attachment A - General Fund Attachment B - Highway Fund Attachment C - Bed Tax Fund Attachment D - Summary All Funds Attachment E - GF Local Sales Tax ATTACHMENT A January YTD Financial Status General Fund % Budget Completion through January --- 58.3% % Actuals YE % Variance to Budget to Budget REVENUES: LOCAL SALES TAX 8,506,551 15,676,905 54.3% 15,362,467 -2.0% LICENSES & PERMITS 889,668 1,805,547 49.3% 1,488,226 -17.6% FEDERAL GRANTS 435,744 597,365 72.9% 662,549 10.9% STATE GRANTS 667,320 1,607,300 41.5% 1,422,155 -11.5% STATE/COUNTY SHARED 5,843,418 10,303,762 56.7% 10,303,762 0.0% OTHER INTERGOVERNMENTAL 10,000 15,000 66.7% 15,000 0.0% CHARGES FOR SERVICES 1,086,871 1,688,995 64.4% 1,794,629 6.3% FINES 75,859 180,000 42.1% 120,000 -33.3% INTEREST INCOME 83,778 81,125 103.3% 90,000 10.9% MISCELLANEOUS 43,086 135,000 31.9% 135,000 0.0% TRANSFERS IN - 185,000 0.0%185,000 0.0% TOTAL REVENUES 17,642,295 32,275,999 54.7% 31,578,788 -2.2% % Actuals YE % Variance to Budget to Budget EXPENDITURES: COUNCIL 126,048 207,022 60.9% 207,022 0.0% CLERK 224,504 497,102 45.2% 391,102 -21.3% MANAGER 409,956 721,724 56.8% 721,724 0.0% HUMAN RESOURCES 201,826 371,998 54.3% 371,998 0.0% FINANCE 417,234 748,060 55.8% 737,182 -1.5% INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 776,540 1,432,374 54.2% 1,432,374 0.0% GENERAL ADMINISTRATION 958,655 1,867,600 51.3% 1,805,600 -3.3% LEGAL 378,062 756,855 50.0% 743,405 -1.8% COURT 425,109 789,826 53.8% 789,826 0.0% DEV & INFRASTRUCTURE SVCS 2,470,338 4,564,803 54.1% 4,303,182 -5.7% PARKS & RECREATION 1,537,381 2,722,617 56.5% 2,722,617 0.0% POLICE 8,557,874 14,885,819 57.5% 14,759,198 -0.9% TRANSFERS OUT 1,044,298 2,890,965 36.1%2,770,965 -4.2% TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17,527,825 32,456,765 54.0% 31,756,195 -2.2% SURPLUS / (DEFICIT) 114,470 (180,766) (177,407) BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 11,534,023 Plus: Surplus / (Deficit)(177,407) ENDING FUND BALANCE **11,356,615 * Year-end estimates are subject to further revision ** Ending fund balance amounts are estimates and are subject to further revision FY 2014/2015 Year End Estimate * Budget Year End Estimate * Actuals thru 1/2015 Actuals thru 1/2015 Budget F:\BUDGET ANALYST\Financial Reports 2014-2015\3Q\Jan\Jan FY15 Monthly Report 03/09/2015 ATTACHMENT B January YTD Financial Status FY 2014/2015 % Budget Completion through January --- 58.3% Actuals thru 1/2015 Budget % Actuals to Budget Year End Estimate * YE % Variance to BudgetREVENUES: LICENSES & PERMITS 35,735 52,000 68.7% 58,882 13.2% STATE/COUNTY SHARED 1,589,428 2,754,947 57.7% 2,882,445 4.6% CHARGES FOR SERVICES 75,537 129,493 58.3% 129,493 0.0% INTEREST INCOME 21,380 19,250 111.1% 25,000 29.9% MISCELLANEOUS 5,651 10,000 56.5%10,000 0.0% TOTAL REVENUES 1,727,731 2,965,690 58.3% 3,105,820 4.7% Actuals thru 1/2015 Budget % Actuals to Budget Year End Estimate * YE % Variance to BudgetEXPENDITURES: ADMINISTRATION 299,831 610,478 49.1% 610,478 0.0% TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING 294,289 537,275 54.8% 537,275 0.0% PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT 403,837 1,219,002 33.1% 1,219,002 0.0% STREET MAINTENANCE 585,975 1,053,631 55.6% 1,053,297 0.0% TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 254,543 934,276 27.2%934,276 0.0% TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,838,475 4,354,662 42.2% 4,354,328 0.0% SURPLUS / (DEFICIT) (110,744) (1,388,972) (1,248,508) BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 4,175,161 Plus: Surplus / (Deficit)(1,248,508) ENDING FUND BALANCE **2,926,653 * Year-end estimates are subject to further revision ** Ending fund balance amounts are estimates and are subject to further revision Highway Fund F:\BUDGET ANALYST\Financial Reports 2014-2015\3Q\Jan\Jan FY15 Monthly Report 03/09/2015 ATTACHMENT C January YTD Financial Status % Budget Completion through January --- 58.3% % Actuals YE % Variance to Budget to Budget REVENUES: BED TAXES 449,135 944,571 47.5% 944,571 0.0% INTEREST INCOME 4,320 4,125 104.7%6,000 45.5% TOTAL REVENUES 453,455 948,696 47.8% 950,571 0.2% % Actuals YE % Variance to Budget to Budget EXPENDITURES: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 315,704 608,457 51.9% 608,157 0.0% TRANSFERS OUT 167,543 352,543 47.5%352,543 0.0% TOTAL EXPENDITURES 483,247 961,000 50.3% 960,700 0.0% SURPLUS / (DEFICIT) (29,792) (12,304) (10,129) BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 425,099 Plus: Surplus / (Deficit)(10,129) ENDING FUND BALANCE **414,970 * Year-end estimates are subject to further revision ** Ending fund balance amounts are estimates and are subject to further revision FY 2014/2015 Year End Estimate * Budget Year End Estimate * Bed Tax Fund Budget Actuals thru 1/2015 Actuals thru 1/2015 F:\BUDGET ANALYST\Financial Reports 2014-2015\3Q\Jan\Jan FY15 Monthly Report 03/09/2015 ATTACHMENT D Co n s o l i d a t e d Y e a r - t o - D a t e F i n a n c i a l R e p o r t t h r o u g h J a n u a r y , 2 0 1 5 FY 2014/201 5 FY 1 4 / 1 5 C a p i t a l L e a s e s / Left in Accounts Be g i n B a l . T r a n s f e r O u t Thru Jan 2015 Ge n e r a l F u n d - Un a s s i g n e d 9 , 9 2 5 , 9 8 8 1 7 , 6 4 2 , 2 9 5 - 1 7 , 6 4 2 , 2 9 5 1 , 0 4 7 , 7 5 7 1 2 , 3 2 0 , 1 8 8 4 , 0 2 1 , 3 2 2 1 3 8 , 5 5 7 - - 17,527,825 10,040,458 Ge n e r a l F u n d - A s s i g n e d 1 , 6 0 8 , 0 3 5 1,608,035 Hi g h w a y F u n d - R e s t r i c t e d 4 , 1 7 5 , 1 6 1 1 , 7 2 7 , 7 3 1 - 1 , 7 2 7 , 7 3 1 - 1 , 0 2 5 , 2 9 9 3 2 7 , 0 9 4 4 8 6 , 0 8 2 - - 1,838,475 4,064,418 Se i z u r e & F o r f e i t u r e - S t a t e 5 2 6 , 9 0 1 9 8 , 2 7 8 - 9 8 , 2 7 8 - 4 , 9 8 7 8 2 , 0 7 5 5 6 , 3 2 8 - - 143,390 481,789 Se i z u r e & F o r f e i t u r e - J u s t i c e 3 4 9 , 7 2 4 1 5 , 1 2 2 - 1 5 , 1 2 2 - 6 9 , 8 5 9 3 2 , 3 8 1 6 , 6 9 8 - - 108,938 255,908 Be d T a x F u n d - C o m m i t t e d 4 2 5 , 0 9 9 4 5 3 , 4 5 5 - 4 5 3 , 4 5 5 1 6 7 , 5 4 3 1 3 6 , 6 5 2 1 7 9 , 0 5 1 - - - 483,247 395,307 Im p o u n d F e e F u n d 7 , 3 4 6 2 1 , 0 0 0 - 2 1 , 0 0 0 - 1 5 , 2 8 4 - - - - 15,284 13,062 Mu n i c i p a l D e b t S e r v i c e F u n d 5 3 3 , 9 2 8 4 4 3 , 1 0 3 4 4 3 , 1 0 3 - - 1 2 , 8 7 8 - - 847,433 860,310 116,720 Or a c l e R o a d D e b t S e r v i c e F u n d 2 8 1 1 5 8 , 3 6 3 1 5 8 , 3 6 3 - - 6 9 5 - - 154,356 155,051 3,593 Al t e r n a t i v e W a t e r R e s o u r c e s D e v I m p a c t F e e F u n d 3 , 3 3 6 , 0 9 9 5 5 1 , 3 6 9 - 5 5 1 , 3 6 9 - - 3 9 , 1 2 7 8 1 , 2 3 6 - - 120,363 3,767,105 Po t a b l e W a t e r S y s t e m D e v I m p a c t F e e F u n d 4 , 5 0 5 , 6 3 5 2 9 3 , 0 9 9 - 2 9 3 , 0 9 9 - - - - - 48,263 48,263 4,750,472 To w n w i d e R o a d w a y D e v e l o p m en t I m p a c t F e e F u n d 2 , 7 9 1 , 1 6 6 3 5 4 , 2 0 4 - 3 5 4 , 2 0 4 - - - 2 3 1 , 3 3 4 - - 231,334 2,914,036 Pa r k s & R e c r e a t i o n I m p a c t F e e F u n d 2 1 , 5 5 5 5 8 , 0 0 5 - 5 8 , 0 0 5 - - - - - - - 79,560 Li b r a r y I m p a c t F e e F u n d 1 1 4 , 7 9 8 - - - - - - 2 0 , 0 0 0 - - 20,000 94,798 Po l i c e I m p a c t F e e F u n d 2 0 5 , 9 3 6 2 4 , 0 8 5 - 2 4 , 0 8 5 - - - - - - - 230,021 Ge n e r a l G o v e r n m e n t I m p a c t F e e F u n d 3 , 5 0 2 2 - 2 - - - - - - - 3,504 Na r a n j a P a r k F u n d 7 3 7 , 0 5 6 - - - - - - 4 6 7 , 0 7 9 - - 467,079 269,977 Ge n e r a l G o v e r n m e n t C I P F u n d 1 , 5 0 0 , 0 0 0 - 8 8 3 , 3 3 3 8 8 3 , 3 3 3 - - - 6 6 4 , 1 1 2 - - 664,112 1,719,221 Wa t e r U t i l i t y 11 , 8 2 3 , 3 4 2 9 , 5 2 0 , 9 1 3 - 9 , 5 2 0 , 9 1 3 3 , 1 1 9 1 , 6 0 9 , 7 3 8 3 , 0 2 5 , 5 3 2 1 , 8 0 1 , 3 1 3 - 741,172 7,180,874 14,163,381 St o r m w a t e r U t i l i t y 50 3 , 4 7 4 3 8 5 , 6 0 8 - 3 8 5 , 6 0 8 - 1 8 5 , 3 1 5 2 8 8 , 0 1 3 1 4 3 , 1 8 4 - - 616,512 272,570 Fl e e t F u n d 8 4 , 9 4 9 1 , 0 0 1 , 7 7 5 - 1 , 0 0 1 , 7 7 5 - 4 5 , 0 5 5 3 5 0 , 3 3 9 5 0 7 , 1 3 2 - - 902,525 184,199 Be n e f i t S e l f I n s u r a n c e F u n d 5 8 4 , 5 0 9 1 , 3 4 1 , 2 2 5 - 1 , 3 4 1 , 2 2 5 - - 1 , 6 4 4 , 7 3 3 4 , 9 2 2 - - 1,649,655 276,079 Re c r e a t i o n I n - L i e u F e e F u n d 6 , 1 9 0 - - - - - - - - - - 6,190 To t a l 4 3 , 7 7 0 , 6 7 4 3 4 , 0 8 9 , 6 3 3 8 8 3 , 3 3 3 3 4 , 9 7 2 , 9 6 6 1 , 2 1 8 , 4 1 9 1 5 , 4 1 2 , 3 7 8 1 0 , 0 0 3 , 2 4 0 4 , 6 0 7 , 9 7 6 - 1,791,223 33,033,236 45,710,403 Total Out Pe r s o n n e l O & M C a p i t a l C o n t i n g e n c y Fu n d R e v e n u e Ot h e r F i n So u r c e s / T f r s To t a l I n Debt Service F: \ B U D G E T A N A L Y S T \ F i n a n c i a l R e p o r t s 2 0 1 4 - 2 0 1 5 \ 3 Q \ J a n \ A t t a c h m e n t D - S u m m a r y A l l F u n d s 03/09/2015 ATTACHMENT E Ge n e r a l F u n d L o c a l Sa l e s T a x C o l l e c t i o n s FY 2014/201 5 CA T E G O R Y J U L Y A U G S E P O C T N O V D E C J A N F E B M A R A P R M A Y J U N E T O T A L Co n s t r u c t i o n S a l e s T a x 3 5 3 , 2 5 7 3 6 5 , 8 7 7 3 4 3 , 0 7 1 3 1 7 , 5 9 5 2 9 1 , 8 1 6 2 9 3 , 0 3 2 3 5 8 , 7 7 3 2,323,421 Ut i l i t y S a l e s T a x 2 6 9 , 7 7 2 2 9 9 , 1 5 4 2 9 2 , 4 5 6 2 6 1 , 3 3 3 1 3 5 , 9 6 6 1 9 7 , 3 4 1 2 2 7 , 7 4 2 1,683,764 Re t a i l S a l e s T a x 3 9 2 , 4 1 7 4 1 4 , 6 3 9 3 8 3 , 8 5 3 3 9 0 , 5 6 7 4 1 5 , 3 8 8 5 0 7 , 9 4 9 6 6 7 , 7 3 2 3,172,545 Al l O t h e r L o c a l S a l e s T a x * 23 1 , 6 0 3 1 , 0 2 6 9 6 9 4 5 0 , 4 4 4 2 8 5 , 4 4 3 3 4 7 , 6 7 9 315,824 1,632,988 TO T A L 1 , 2 4 7 , 0 4 9 $ 1 , 0 8 0 , 6 9 6 $ 1 , 0 2 0 , 3 4 9 $ 1 , 4 1 9 , 9 3 9 $ 1 , 1 2 8 , 6 1 3 $ 1 , 3 4 6 , 0 0 1 $ 1 , 5 7 0 , 0 7 1 $ 8,812,718 $ * N o t e : D o e s n o t i n c l u d e c a b l e f r a n c h i s e f e e s o r s a l e s t a x a u d i t r e v e n u e s F: \ B U D G E T A N A L Y S T \ F i n a n c i a l R e p o r t s 2 0 1 4 - 2 0 1 5 \ 3 Q \ J a n \ A t t a c h m e n t E - G e n F u n d L o c a l S a l e s T a x 03/10/2015 Town Council Regular Session Item # C. Meeting Date:03/18/2015   Submitted By:Rosevelt Arellano Development Infrastructure Services Department:Development Infrastructure Services Information SUBJECT: Request for approval of a Final Plat for Block 3 of the Maracay at Vistoso subdivision, located on the northwest corner of the Pebble Creek Drive and La Cañada Drive intersection RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval.   EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant requests approval of a Final Plat for two of six communities in the Maracay at Vistoso subdivision. The Final Plat (Attachment 1) features 101 lots, private streets and common areas. The Final Plat has been reviewed and meets Town requirements. BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: The Final Plat requires Town Council approval prior to being officially recorded by Pima County. In June 2013, the Town Council approved the Conceptual Site Plan with the condition that lots along the west side of the property be limited to one-story. The Final Plat is in conformance with the one-story condition and all design components (i.e. site layout, common areas, golf course setbacks, etc.) approved as part of the Conceptual Site Plan. Proposed Improvements:  23.35 acres subdivided into 101 lots Average lot size: 5,146 sq. ft. Building height: 30 ft., 1 and 2-story Common areas throughout the site Previous Approvals:  June 2014: Block Plat for entire Maracay at Vistoso subdivision July 2014: Block 2 Final Plat October 2014: Block 1 Final Plat March 2015: Block 4 Final Plat FISCAL IMPACT: N/A SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to APPROVE the Final Plat for Block 3 of the Maracay at Vistoso subdivision as provided on Attachment 1, finding that it meets Town requirements.   OR   I MOVE to DENY the Final Plat for Block 3 of the Maracay at Vistoso subdivision as provided on Attachment 1, finding that ___________________. Attachments Attachment 1 - Final Plat APPROVALS I • ClERK OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS APPROVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ON THE DAY OF , 20_. CLERK, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT TOWN ENGINEER PLANNING MANAGER WATER UTiUTY DIRECTOR ASSURANCES DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE ASSURANCES IN THE FORM OF FROM TlTI.E SECURITY AGENCY OF ARIZONA AS RECORDED IN SEQUENCE NO. HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO GUARANTEE DRAINAGE AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS (INCLUDING MONUMENTS) AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS (ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE. GAS, SEWER, WATER) IN THE SUBDIVISION. BY: ""M""A Y"'O""R----:;::TO""WN~OF~O""RO:::-:-:VA".,LLE~Y DATE ASSURANCES IN THE FORM OF FROM, TITI.E SECURITY AGENCY OF ARIZONA HAVE BEEN PROVIDED TO GUARANTEE THE RESEEDING OF THIS SUBDIVISION IN THE EVENT THE PROJECT IS ABANDONED, WATER ADEQUACY THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY HAS BEEN DESIGNATED BY THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT WATER RESOURCES AS HAVING AN ASSURED WATER SUPPLY, PURSUANT TO ARS §45-576 AND HEREBY CERTIFIES IN WRITING TO SUPPLY WATER TO THIS SUBDIVISION. BY: ________ _ WATER UTILITY DIRECTOR RECORDING DATA STATE OF ARIZONA) FEE __ _ )SS COUNTY OF PIMA) No. __ _ THIS INSTRUMENT WAS FILED FOR RECORD AT THE REQUEST OF THE WLB GROUP. INC., ON THIS DAY OF , 20---, AT M. IN SEQUENCE NO. , THEREOF. F. ANN RODRIGUEZ. PIMA COUNTY RECORDER BY: ~DE=P-:-::UTY::-:-:P:::cOR::-::-:PI-:-::MA:--:-CO::-:-U-:-::NTY::-:-:R:::EC::-:OR:::D=ER=---- CERTIFICATION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE BOUNDARY SURVEY SHOWN ON THIS PLAT WAS PERFORMED UNDER MY DIRECTION AND THAT ALL EXISTING AND/OR PROPOSED SURVEY MONUMENTS AND MARKERS SHOWN ARE CORRECTLY DESCRIBED. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECTION. r , ) i I . I V PETER D. COTE. R.LS., No. 44121 \ I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECTION AND THAT THE 100-YEAR FLOOD PRONE L1MI S~,)~S-NO'rED WERE REVIEWED AND SHOWN UNDER MY DIRECTION. DAVID W. UTILE, P.E., NO. 36234 The WLB Group EXPIRES 6/30/2016 Engineering • Planning • Surveying Landscape Architecture· Urban Design Offices located in Tucson. Phoenix, Flagstaff. AZ. and Las Vegas. NV. 4444 East Broad~ay Tucson, Arizona (520) 881-7480 LECEND SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY RIGHT OF WAY LOT UNE 100 YR. FLOOD UNE EROSION HAZARD SET-BACK UNE EASEMENT UNE SECTION UNE INDICATES BRASS DISK SURVEY MONUMENT STAMPED TO BE SET BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR UPON COMPLETION OF ROAD CONSTRUCTION • FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED ---<0 1/2" IRON PARCEL PIN TO BE SET; TAGGED RLS 44121 UPON COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTS • EXIST. BOUNDARY CORNERS, 1/2" IP TAGGED RLS 12214 ® EXIST. BOUNDARY CORNERS, 1/2" IP TAGGED RLS 26923 N.A.E. NO ACCESS EASEMENT P .U.E. PUBUC UTILITY EASEMENT -0-SECTION CORNER / QUARTER SECTION CORNER C.A. COMMON AREA EHS EROSION HAZARD SETBACK IP IRON PIN SVT SIGHT VlSIBIL TY TRIANGLE SHEET INDEX SHEET 1 SHEETS 2 -4 SHEETS S CO~ SHEET PLAN SHEETS UNE AND CURVE TABLES L=82.3S' R=75.00' 0=62'54'52" RANCHO VlSTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 10 PARCEL B&C (R. v. P.A.D.) BK. 58, PG. 84 S29·30'22"W 150.00' L=66.86' R=200.00' D=19"09'19" S48'39' 41"W 150.00' N )(S26.~ -f.1IS; R.1JEVtfI-- N16'35'52"E ~ ~ S89'47'14"W 2,636.87' 89.69' \ '!P. S77"OO'oo"E ~ 28.33' N26'54'27"W 23.99' N77"OO'OO'W 113.29'.iiI:: .,...~~ ·8-R/r __ '9 ;S ::? ... Cr.l MARACA Y AT VISTOSO BLOCK 5 Seq. 20142480246 L=2S2.29· R=820.00' 0=1737'43" L=579.80' R=214O.00' 0=15'31'25" 3" = 1 MILE DEDICATION 13 18 -"-"""\,,,,,"19 LOCATION MAP A PORTION OF SECTION 26 T11S, Rl3E. G & S.R.M •• TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA 30 \\E, THE UNDERSIGNED, HEREBY WARRANT THAT v.E ARE ALL ,AND 1HE CRY PARllES HA\4NG ,ANY REcrno 11ll.E INTEREST IN ---_ 1HE LftND 9'i0'lttl ON lHIS PLAT ftND v.E CONSENT TO 1HE SUBDI\1SION OF SAID lftND IN 1HE t.4ftNNER 9'i0'lttl HEREON. GENERAL NOTES 1. THE GROSS AREA OF THIS SUBDIVISION IS 23.35 ACRES. THE DENSITY IS 4.33 UNITS PER ACRE. LOT AREA IS 11.93 ACRES. THE AREA OF PRIVATE STREETS (C.A.'s "A"&"B") IS 5.20 ACRES. 2. TOTAl. NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL LOTS IS 101. 3. COMMON AREA SIZE (ACRES) USE: C.A. "A" 2.15 PRIVATE STREETS AND PUBUC UTlUTlES, C.A. "B" 3.05 PRIVATE STREETS AND PUBLIC UTILITIES. '---L=430.66' C.A. "C" 1.43 OPEN SPACE, DRAINAGE. RECREATION. PUBUC SEWER. AND PUBLIC UTlUTlES. R=895.63' C.A. "0" 3.93 OPEN SPACE, DRAINAGE. PUBLIC SEWER, AND PUBLIC UTILITIES. 0=27'33'01" C.A. "E" 0.05 OPEN SPACE. DRAINAGE. AND PUBUC UTlUTlEs. C.A. "F" 0.61 OPEN SPACE, DRAINAGE, AND PUBLIC UTILITIES. C.A. "G" 0.07 OPEN SPACE. DRAINAGE. AND PUBUC UTiUTlES, C.A. "H" 0.01 OPEN SPACE, DRAINAGE. AND PUBLIC UTiUTlES, C.A. "I" 0.06 OPEN SPACE, DRAINAGE, AND PUBLIC UTlUTlES. C.A. "J" 0.03 OPEN SPACE, DRAINAGE. AND PUBLIC UTILITIES. 4. ALL STREETS ARE PRIVATE. MILES OF PRIVATE STREETS = 0.52 MILES 5. THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT IS 4,179 S.F. (0.10 AC.) 6. THE MAXIMUM LOT SIZE FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT IS 7,780 S.F. (0.18 Ae.) 7. THE AVERAGE LOT SIZE FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT IS 5.146 S.F. (0.12 AC.) MARACAY AT VlSTOSO BLOCK 1 Seq. 20142480246 MARACA Y AT VlSTOSO C.A. "A" Seq. 20142480246 -I ~_-+ L=225.86· R=150.00' 0=86"16'26" MARACAY AT VlSTOSO BLOCK 2 Seq. 20142480246 Ef3PROJECT LAYOUT 1" = 200' 8. MAXIMUM PERMITTED BUILDING HEIGHT IS LIMITED TO 30 FEET, TWO (2) STORIES. HOMES ON LOTS 15 THRU 31 AND 72 THRU 80 SHAL BE LIMITED TO ONE STORY. 9. BUILDING SETBACK PROVISIONS: FRONT-20 FEET SlDE-5 OR 0 FEET REAR-5 FEET A 15 FEET FRONT SETBACK (Z-LOTS ONLY) IS PERMITTED FOR HOMES WITH A SIDE ENTRY GARAGE OR A FRONT ENTRY GARAGE PROVIDED THAT A DRIVEWAY AT LEAST 20 FEET IN LENGTH IS MAINTAINED ON THE PROPERTY AND ONLY ON STREETS UTILIZING A STAGGERED STREETSCAPE DESIGN. 10. NO ADDITIONAL ON STREET PARKING IS PROVIDED FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT. 11. EXISTING ZONING: RANCHO VlSTOSO P.A.D. -MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 12. NO FURTHER SUBDIVISION OF ANY LOT OR PARCEL SHOWN SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE ORO VAI.LEY TOWN COUNCIL 13. THE BASIS OF BEARING FOR THIS PROJECT IS THE NORTH UNE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECll0N 26, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH. RANGE 13 EAST. GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN. TOWN OF ORO VAl.LEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA. SAID BEARING BEING: N89·47'14"E. PER THE BLOCK PLAT SEQ. NO. 20142480246. 14. THE PROFESSIONAl. ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL CERTIFY AS TO THE FORM. LINE AND FUNCTION OF ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE ROADWAYS AND DRAINAGE STRUCTURES BEFORE THE RELEASE OF ASSURANCES. 15. THE PROPERTY OWNER. HIS SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNS. OR A DEDICATED HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION AGREES TO 1) KEEP ALL COMMON AREAS MAINTAINED IN A 'A£ED-FREE, TRASH-FREE CONDITION, 2) REPLACE ANY DEAD PLANT MATERIALS WITHIN 90 DAYS. AND 3) MAINTAIN THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IN PROPER WORKING ORDER. 16. THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL BE SERVED BY ORO VALLEY WATER UTiUTY (OVWIJ) WHICH HAS BEEN DESIGNATED AS HAVING AN ASSURED lOD-YEAR WATER SUPPLY BY THE DIRECTOR OF WATER RESOURCES, 17. UTILITIES WILL BE LOCATED UNDERGROUND IN CONFORMANCE WITH ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION AMENDED GENERAL ORDER U-48. 18. THE LANDSCAPING WITHIN ALL PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LANDSCAPING AND PLANTING GUIDELINES FOR PUBLIC SEWERS OF THE ENGINEERNG DESIN STANDARDS 2012, SUBSECTION 7.7. 19. NO PERMITS FOR PERMANENT STRUCTURES (I.E. MASONRY WALLS. FENCES, ETC.) ON OR THROUGH THE PUBUC SEWER EASEMENT WILL BE ISSUED WITHOUT SEPARATE WRITTEN CONSENT OF PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT. 20. NO FINAL INSPECTION FOR ANY LOT WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHALL BE APPROVED UNTIL A BUILDING CODE OFFICIAl. HAS ~IFlED CONSTRUCTION ON THE LOT IS COMPLETE AND SIDEWALKS HAVE BEEN INSTALLED, PROPERTY LINE TO PROPERTY UNE. 21. A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY SANITARY SEWER WORK ON THIS PROJECT. 22. CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION FROM PIMA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY IS REQUIRED BEFORE BEGINNING ANY SANITARY SEWER WORK ON THIS PROJECT. APPROVAL OF THIS FINAL PLAT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION. 23. INTERIOR PROPERTY CORNERS AND CENTERLINE MONUMENTATION SHALL BE SET AS SOON AS COMPLETION OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE AND IMPROVEMENTS MAKE IT PRACTICAL TO DO SO. IF SUCH MONUMENTS SHOULD DIFFER FROM THE TYPE DESCRIBED ON THE FINAL PLAT, A RECORD OF SURVEY PLAT SHALL BE RECORDED SHOWING THESE DIFFERENCES. 24. THIS SUBDIVISION WILL BE SERVICED BY ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY. 25. THE AREA BETWEEN 100 YEAR FLOOD LIMITS REPRESENTS AN AREA THAT MAY BE SUBJECT TO FLOODING FROM A 100 YEAR FREQUENCY FLOOD AND ALL LAND IN THIS AREA WILL BE RESTRICTED TO USES COMPATIBLE WITH FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT AS APPROVED BY THE TOWN ENGINEER. 26. NO IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN THIRTY (30) AND SEVENTY-TWO (72) INCHES IN HEIGHT RELATIVE TO THE ADJACENT PAAL/ROADWAY WHICH MIGHT INTERFERE WITH THE PURPOSE AND INTENT OF THE SIGHT DISTANCE TRIANGLE SHALL BE PERMITTED, PLACED OR MAINTAINED WITHIN 15 (FIFTEEN) FEET OF A PAAL-TO-PAAL INTERSECTION. WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, OUR SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, DO HEREBY SAVE THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, THEIR EMPLOYEES, OFFICERS, AND AGENTS HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES RELATED TO THE USE OF SAID LANDS NOW AND IN THE FUTURE BY REASON OF FLOODING, FLOWAGE, EROSION, OR DAMAGE CAUSED BY WATER, WHETHER SURFACE FLOOD, OR RAINFALL. IT IS FURTHER UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED THAT NATURAL DRAINAGE SHALL NOT BE ALTERED, DISTURBED, OR OBSTRUCTED OTHER THAN AS SHOWN HEREON WITHOUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL WE. THE UNDERSIGNED. HEREBY DEDICATE TO PIMA COUNTY. COMMON AREAS "A" AND "B" AS PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF ACCESS, INSTAlLATION. MAINTENANCE, CONSTRUCTION, AND REPLACEMENT OF PUBLIC SEWERS. WE HEREBY CONVEY TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY AND ALL PUBLIC UTILITY COMPANIES EASEMENTS AS SHOWN HEREON FOR THE PURPOSE OF ACCESS, INSTALLATION. AND MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC SEWERS AND UTILITIES AND OTHER USES AS DESIGNATED BY THIS PLAT. PRIVATE DRAINAGEWAYS AND COMMON AREAS, AS SHOWN HEREON. ARE RESERVED FOR THE PRIVATE USE AND CONVENIENCE OF ALL OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION. THEIR GUESTS AND INVITEES. AND (EXCEPT FOR DRAINAGE WAYS), FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND SEWERS. THE PUBLIC PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENTS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT ARE DEDICATED TO THE PUBLIC TO PROVIDE FOR PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ONLY. THE LOT OWNERS ASSOCIATION ACCEPTS ALL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CONTROL, MAINTENANCE. SAFETY AND LIABILITY OF THE EASEMENT AND ANY IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE EASEMENT. TlTl.E TO THE LAND OF ALL PRIVATE DRAINAGEWAYS AND COMMON AREAS SHALL BE VESTED IN AN ASSOCIAllON OF INDIVIDUAL LOT OWNERS AS ESTABLISHED BY COVENANTS. CONDIllONS AND RESTRICTIONS RECORDED IN SEQUENCE NO. 20143420490 IN THE OFFICE OF THE PIMA COUNTY RECORDER. EACH AND EVERY LOT OWNER WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHALL BE A MEMBER OF THE ASSOCIATION. WHICH WILL ACCEPT ALL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CONTROL. MAINTENANCE. SAFETY AND LIABILITY OF ALL DRAINAGEWAYS AND COMMON AREAS WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION AS SHOWN HEREON. ACCESS TO COMMON AREAS "C", "D" AND "I" WILL BE THROUGH THE ADJOINING GOLF COURSE PER AGREEMENT WITH SAME. llTl.E SECURITY AGENCY OF ARIZONA, L.L.C •• A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY. D.B.A. llTl.E SECURITY AGENCY L.l.C.. AS TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST NUMBER 201405-T. ONLY AND NOT OTHERWISE. BENEFICIARY OF TRUST 201405-T MARACAY 91 LLC. DATE 15279 N. SCOTISDALE RD. STE. 300 SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85254 NOTARY STATE OF ARIZONA) FEE __ _ )SS COUNTY OF PIMA) No. __ _ ON THIS. THE DAY OF , 2014, BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED PERSONALLY APPEARED. WHO ACKNOWLEDGED SELF TO BE _____ TlTI.E SECURITY AGENCY OF ARIZONA, INC. AND BEING AUTHORIZED SO TO DO. EXECUTED THE FORGOING INSTRUMENT FOR THE PURPOSE THEREIN CONTAINED BY SELF AS TRUST OFFICER. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: NOTARY PUBUC OV1214-28 FINAL PLAT MARACAY AT VISTOSO RESUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 3 LOTS 1 THRU 101 AND CO .... ON AREAS • A· THRU • JB BEING A RESUBDlVlSlON OF MARACAY HOMES AT VlSTOSO. BLOO<S 1 lHROUGH 5 AND COMMON AREA -A-AS RECORDED IN SEQ., 20142~246. BEING A PORllON OF SECllON 26 TOYtt&fIP 11 SOUlH, RANGE 13 EAST, G &: S.R.M. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA 27. NO IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN THIRTY (30) AND SEVENTY-TWO (72) INCHES IN HEIGHT RELATIVE TO THE ADJACENT ROADWAY WHICH MIGHT INTERFERE WITH THE PURPOSE AND INTENT OF THE SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE SHALL BE PERMITTED, PLACED OR MAINTAINED WITHIN THE SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLES SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. PROPERTY OWNERS SHALL MAINTAIN PLANTINGS TO ENSURE UNOBSTRUCTED VlSIBIUTY TO MOTORISTS. ALL SHRUBS. ACCENTS AND GROUNDCOVERS SHALL NOT EXCEED THIRTY (30) INCHES IN HEIGHT WITHIN THE SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLES. TREES WITHIN THE SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLES WILL BE MAINTAINED TO ENSURE THAT BRANCHES/FOLIAGE IS NOT BELOW A HEIGHT OF SEVENTY-rNO (72) INCHES .. __________________________ r# 28. GATES AND LOCKS LIMITING THE MAINTENANCE AND ACCESS THROUGH THE PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENT SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ENGINEERING DESIGN STANDARDS 2012, SUBSECTION 7.5. REF: 0VI214-02 AUGUST 2014 COUNTY. ARIZONA SHEET 1 OF 5 SEQ. #: •• ::tI::: • o UJ Vl ~ ~ a 11. I f<") .Y. " o lD I > ~ f<") .Y. () o ~ > '" c: ~ ~ " 11. '" o I ~ :0 c: o o ~ ~ 3-o -I <..'l W 5-o '" o '" 00 :;- Z -- The WLB Group NEAR SIDE S. V. T. C.A. "c" N85i l' 4-8"E LA CANADA DRIVE --~ DETAIL "A. " 1" =40' VISTOSO GOLF COURSE DKT. 13841, PG. 2639 ---- LOT 30 7,681 Sq. Ft. 0.18 Ac. LOT 31 7,780 Sg. Ft. 0.18 Ac. --- I 1 19 \ \ --- , . . , .. .. , .... FAR SIDE S. V. T. C.A. "c" DETAIL 1'=20' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . .... Engineering. Planning • Surveying Landscape Architecture. Urban Design Offices located in Tucson. Phoenix, Flagstaff, AZ. and Las Vegas, NV. 4444 East Broad~ay Tucson, Arizona (520) 881-7480 . , .. o· - . . . . . ' . 40' - , . ' MARACAY AT VISTOSO BLOCK 1 Seq. 20142480246 80' 120' 18 , . ' . . . , . ' . ' .. ' . . . EXPIRES /2015 ~ 0. , . IN COMPUANCE WITH CERllFICA llON SHOWN ON SHEET ONE 63 , . REF: " . . . ' 52 53 -------- -- -;::::-~ l::J I Uill ::::> ill ..;:j- C"J 0 CXJ ..;:j- C"J ..;:j- ...- 0 C"J ~~I a... • w~ 0- ..-.JI Q) ~\U1 I \ I \ , \ ........... MARACAY AT VISTOSO BLOCK 2 Seq. 20142480246 OV1214-2B FINAL PLAT MARACAY AT VISTOSO RESUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 3 . ' . \" \ UOTS 1 THRU 101 AND COMMON AREAS -A-THRU -J- BEING A RESUBDI\1S1ON a" MARACAY HOMES AT \1STOSO, BLOO<S 1 lHROUGH 5 AND cot.IvtON AREA -A-AS RE~DED IN SEQ., 20142480246, BEING A PORlION a" SEClION 26 Tov.tISHIP 11 SOUlH, RANGE 13 EAST, G & S.R.M. TOYIII a" ORO VALLEY. PIMA COUNTY. ARIZONA AUGUST 2014 SHEET 2 OF 5 OVl214-02 SEQ. #: •• =M= • 0 ~ ~ o G: I n "" u w (/l o m I > t>' /' n "" u o m /' D- "-/' '" c ~ ~ o D- " o :r: ~ OJ C o o o >-:::;; /' o w 3-o c() o c() <Xl :;;- Z The WLB Group 0' NEAR SIDE S. V. T. \~ \\ \\ \~ \ CORA){ WAY \ \ C.A. "E" N60'28'13"E 24.46' (SVT LOT 45 DETAIL "D" 1" =30' ~STOSO GOLF COURSE OKT. 13841, PG. 2639 NEAR SIDE S. V. T. .t..J <;:) ....... ~ /!!l C.A. "D" rv •• : N'V ~ N26'OS'31"W g. \fo.75' (SVT TIE) \ \ \ C.A. "C" 62,382 Sq. Ft. 1.43 Ac. DETAIL ,.' = 20' "c" 40' 80' 120' 21 22 Engineering. Planning • Surveying Landscape Architecture. Urban Design Offices located in Tucson. Phoenix, Flagstaff, AZ. and Las Vegas, NV. 4444 East Broad~ay Tucson. Arizona (520) 881-7480 .' 42 . . . 73 . . . . . . . 1 1 58 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : 10 .. . . . . . . . . EXPIRES /2015 4-0' I I I IN COMPUANCE WITH CERllFICA llON SHOWN ON SHEET ONE , 4-0' MARACAY AT ~STOSO BLOCK 4 Seq. 20142480246 OV1214-2B FINAL PLAT MARACAY AT VISTOSO RESUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 3 UOTS 1 THRU 101 AND COMMON AREAS -A-THRU -J- BEING A RESUBDI\1S1ON a'" MARACAY HOMES AT \1STOSO, BLOO<5 1 lHROUGH 5 AND cot.IvtON AREA -A-AS RE~DED IN SEQ., 20142480246. BEING A PORlION a'" SEClION 26 rov.tISHIP 11 SOUlH. RANGE 13 EAST. G & S.R.M. TOYIII a'" ORO VALLEY. PIMA COUNTY. ARIZONA REF: OVl214-02 AUGUST 2014 SHEET 3 OF 5 SEQ. #: •• • o w (/l '" '< "1:J n o I r- :r: Ul /' ~ ~ o G: I n "" u o m I > t>' /' n "" u o m /' n. u.. /' '" c ~ ~ o n. " o :r: ~ OJ C o o o >-:::;; /' o w 3-o c() o c() <Xl :;;- Z FLOODPLAIN LINE TABLE FLOODPLAIN LINE TABLE CURVE TABLE LINE LENGTH BEARING LINE LENGTH BEARING No. RADIU5 LENGTH CHORD DI5T. DELTA No. RADIUS FL 1 20.77' N60"SS'31"E FL68 16.14' N3S"4S'Ol"E C1 50.00' 78.73' 535"38'39"W 70.84' 90"12'44" C85 1625.00' FL2 40.8D' N34"01'25"E FL59 18.85' N83"OS'lS"E C2 1 B1.00' 52.6B' NBB"20'l B"W 52.50' 16"40'35" C86 1625.00' FL3 13.1 l' N16'04'S8"E FL70 21.92' N03"02' s9"E C3 1 B1.00' 67.34' 586"01'03"E 66.96' 21"19'04" CB7 50.00' FL4 9.16' N06"15' 48''[ FL71 1387' N03'54'48"W C4 1 B1.00' 60.49' NB4"55'59"W 60.21' 1 9"OB'55" CB8 50.00' FLS 9.00' N03"30' 2S"E FL72 15.58' NOTS8'49"W C5 250.00' 44.84' N05"OB'20"W 44.78' 1 0"16' 39" C89 50.00' FL6 12.33' N16"30'14"E FL73 8.24' N1S"4S'44"E C6 25.00' 48.36' N25"20'20"E 41.16' 110"49'23" C90 50.00' FL7 7.96' N28"S7'12''E FL74 4.92' NSO'41'53"W C7 53.50' 62.56' 503"25'34"W 59.06' 66"59'51" C91 50.00' FLB 5.24' N53"33' 41"E FL7S 31.99' N76'4S'07"W C8 50.00' 19.38' N25"49'22"E 19.26' 22"12'15" C92 50.00' FL9 7.79' N74"S4'3B"E FL76 178' NS4'29'OO"W C9 56.00' 64.54' S4T44'OB"W 61.02' 66"01'47" C93 1625.00' FLlO 12.52' N13"06'14"E FL77 1082' SS4'38'lS"W Cl0 25.00' 37.46' N3T49'21"E 34.05' 85"51'21" C94 1625.00' FL11 lS.56' N12"12'43"E FL7B 3.6B' S7B'47'24"W Cll 156.00' 127.72' N28"33'36"W 124.18' 46"54'32" C95 1625.00' FL12 14.BB' N15'sTs2"E FL79 1.9B' N46'10'37"W C12 25.00' 41.19' 580"47'06"W 36.69' 94"24'04" C96 375.00' FL13 7.B3' NOT39'27"W FLBO 11.62' N12"36'26"W C13 575.00' B.12' N33"59'20"E 8.12' 0"4B' 32" C97 375.00' FL14 7.03' N09"28' 22"E FL81 2.63' N66'3To4"w C14 575.00' 42.03' N36'29'14"E 42.02' 4'l1'lB" C98 375.00' FL1S 9.91 ' N34"54'26"E FL82 1.B8' N24'20'21 "w C15 575.00' 52.51' N 41 "11 ' 51" E 52.49' 5"13'55" C99 375.00' FL16 2.64' N33"03'10"E FL83 3.42' N02'l7'12''E C16 575.00' 52.38' N46"25'24"E 52.36' 5"13'10" C100 375.00' FL17 6.06' N01"22'12"W FLB4 2.41' N30"04'oT'E C17 575.00' 42.74' N51"09'44"E 42.73' 4"15'30" C101 375.00' FL18 22.49' S80"45'Ol"W FL85 23.47' N12"49'32"W C18 575.00' 27.18' N54"38'45"E 27.18' 2"42'31" Cl02 375.00' FL19 10.29' NS4"14'59"W FL86 52.27' Nl TS7'S2"W C19 50.00' 20.49' 544"15'27"W 20.35' 23"29'05" Cl03 530.00' FL20 26.32' N09"06'26"E FL87 4.14' N01'14' 46"W C20 50.00' 32.72' Sl3"46'07"W 32.14' 37"29'35" Cl04 530.00' FL21 26.62' Nl0"19'38"W FL88 19.93' N30"OT 43''E C21 51.00' 37.59' N16"08'12"E 36.74' 42'13'45" Cl05 530.00' FL22 19.83' N22"09'18"W FL89 26.11' N38"30'21"E C22 51.00' 104.25' 584"11'16"E 87.03' 11 T07'19" C106 60.00' FL23 2S.11' N15"18' 42"W FL90 27.3T SSS'lT53"W C23 51.00' 39.29' 503"33'33"E 38.32' 44"08'07" C107 60.00' FL24 6.23' N13"24'56"W FL91 7.22' N44'49'31"W C24 51.00' 33.37' 53T15'15"W 32.78' 37"29'29" Cl08 60"00' FL25 8.31' N6r43'40"w FL92 34.99' NOO"40'OS"E C25 525.00' 55.00' N52'59'56"E 54.97' 6'00'09" C109 60.00' FL26 8.43' N82"20' 44"W FL93 3S.19' N01"05'57"W C26 525.00' 65.62' N46"25'OO"E 65.58' T09'42" Cl10 60.00' FL27 10.56' Nl T01'16"W FL94 30.21' N49'09'09"W C27 52500' 65.28' N39"16'26"E 65.23' T07'26" Cl11 50.00' FL28 12.54' N1T52'S6"W FL9S 29.91' N21'3S'31"W C28 525.00' 65.96' N32"06'45"E 65.92' Tl1'56" Cl12 50.00' FL29 10.68' N05"44'35"W FL96 17.08' NOO"28'34"E C29 525.00' 15.03' N2T41 '35"E 15.03' 1"3B'23" C113 51.00' FL30 44.72' N16"16'41"W FL97 lB.36' N2T37'S6"E C30 51.00' 1809' 537"02'06"W 18.00' 20"19'26" Cl14 51.00' FL31 22.21' N02"37'16"W FL98 27.26' NOS'l2'l4"E C31 51.00' 38.37' 568"44'58"W 37.47' 43"06'18" C115 51.00' FL32 7.07' N09"30'S2"W FL99 27.63' N1T49'56"W C32 51.00' 38.15' N6B"16'OO"W 37.27' 42'51'45" Cl16 50.00' FL33 16.17' NOO"S7'4l"w FL100 8.93' N34'06'30"W C33 51.00' 119.89' N20"30'28"E 94.13' 134"41'11" Cl17 50.00' FL34 62.43' N05"24'56"W FL 101 28.S6' N39'32'40"W C34 50.00' 53.21' 55T21'43"W 50.74' 60"58'40" C118 25.00' FL35 10.09' NOO"32'12''E FL102 954' N20'16'16"E C35 25.00' 36.08' 514"28' 33"E 33.03' 82"41'53" C119 580.00' FL36 86.79' N16"20'20"W FL103 12.78' N79"36'29"E C36 206.00' 9.83' N54"27'27"W 9.83' 2'44'06" C120 25.00' FL37 7.38' NOO"06'11"E FL1 04 39.72' N1 T48'3S"W C37 206.00' 34.08' N48"21'02"W 34.04' 9"28'43" C121 25.00' FL3B 91.16' N15"35'26"W FL105 17.8S' N88'32'50"W C38 20600' 33.73' N38"55'14"W 33.69' 9"22'54" C122 50.00' FL39 6.80' N40"32'04"W FL106 lB.89' N65'49'17"W C39 206.00' 48"51' N2T29'OO"W 48.40' 13"29'34" C123 50"00' FL40 39.74' N60"28'S4"W FL107 106.07' N45"17'41"W C40 206.00' 42.08' N14'53'08"W 42.00' 11"42'10" C124 51.00' FL41 14.21' N6T16'42"W FL10B 11.89' N24'46'39"W C41 206.00' 14.13' N07"04'12"W 14.12' 3"55'43" C125 51.00' FL42 13.96' NOS"33'13"E FL109 11.48' N01'19'29"W C42 60.00' 6.15' N 12'33' 37" W 6.14' 5"52'06" C126 51.00' FL43 27.13' N15"24'OO"W FL110 24.71' N24'03'41"W C43 60.00' 20.36' NOO"05'44"E 20.26' 19"26'36" C127 25.00' FL44 14.30' N3S"21'03"W FL111 lB.64' N1 r42'49"W C44 60.00' 21.61' N20"08'02"E 21.49' 20"37'59" C128 25.00' FL45 35.02' N1T49'18"W FL112 13.2S' SB6"lT23"E C45 60.00' 29.03' N44'18'43"E 28.75' 27"43'23" C129 325.00' FL46 19.18' NlO"15'01"W FL113 24.82' N13'S6'1S"W C46 60.00' 34.52' N74"39'23"E 34.05' 32"57'56" C130 25.00' FL47 30.86' NOS"2T 42"W FL114 lS.78' N03'4S'46"W C47 25.00' 51.36' 521"53' 41"W 42.79' 117"42' 40" C131 206.00' FL48 30.83' NOT21'34"W FL115 28.69' NOT03'31"E C48 53.50' 45.32' N12"41'37"W 43.98' 48"32'02" C132 50.00' FL49 16.24' N63"07'37"W FLl16 22.61' N03"ST 43"E C49 25.00' 48.36' 543"50'17"E 41.16' 110"49'23" C133 50.00' FLSO 9.86' N04"39'S7"W FL117 36.88' N02'51'58"W C50 25.00' 43.48' N39"49'12"W 38.20' 99"38'23" C134 53.50' FL51 21.32' N15"41'32"E FL118 9.94' N28"45'59"E C51 53.50' 35.69' 570"31'50"E 35.03' 3B"13'07" C135 25.00' FLS2 17.32' NOT52'S5"W FLl19 45.47' N2ro7'12"w C52 50.00' 34,13' N70"58'29"W 33.47' 39"06'25" C136 206.00' FLS3 37.76' N38"58'27"W FL120 13.61' N32'38'S2"W C53 91.00' 24.38' 580"44'31"E 24.30' 15"20'52" C137 200.00' FL54 9.48' N24"54'34"W FL 121 7.18' N1S"12'OS"E C54 156.00' 40.54' N82"48'10"W 40.42' 14"53'17" C138 206.00' FLS5 15.38' 578"16'44"E FL122 14.62' N11"59'57"W C55 25.00' 45.59' 53T30'38"W 39.53' 1 04"29'07" C139 679.00' FLS6 6.34' N72"06'52"E FL123 10.52' S78'S8'33"W C56 325.00' 8.06' 515"26' 34"E 8.06' 1"25'17" C140 679.00' FLS7 1135' N49"3T 20"E FL124 10.32' N41"46'42"W C57 32500' 60.74' 521 "30'28"E 60.65' 1 0"42' 31" C141 679.00' FLS8 25.98' N1T22'24"E FL125 19.7S' N09'22'09"W C58 32500' 3.35' 52T09'28"E 3.35' 0"35'28" C142 679.00' FL59 20.SS' N05"5S'27"W FL 126 4.93' N16"23'32"W C59 1675.00' 48.65' N26"37'l7"W 48.65' 1"39'51" C143 679.00' FL60 31.11' N30"06'S7"W FL127 11.97' N2T22'5S"W C60 1675.00' 52.00' N24"53'59"W 52.00' 1"46'44" C144 146.00' FL61 29.96' N31"52' 49"W FL128 12.71' NOO"39'29"E C61 1675.00' 25.74' N23"34'13"W 25.74' 0"52'49" C145 1795.00' FL62 9.63' N16"05'14"W FL129 382' N26'24'OO"W C62 50.00' 16.51' S32"35'26"E 16.44' 18"55'16" C146 1795.00' FL63 16.82' N01"28'29"W FL130 12.37' N61'12'12"W C63 50.00' 18.66' 552'44'24"E 18.55' 21"22'40" C147 1775.56' FL64 9.06' NU43'34"W FL 131 12.18' N21"37'4S"W C64 50.00' 38.89' N41"08'45"W 37.92' 44"33'57" C148 1775.56' FL65 15.88' N34"53'16"W FL132 9.43' N19"30'34"E C65 50.00' 35.36' NOl '23'58"E 34.63' 40"31'29" C149 1530.00' FL66 6.06' N01"22'12"W FL133 lS.S4' N09"34'16"E C66 50.00' 11.69' S14"57'55"W 11.66 ' 13"23'36" C150 1530.00' FL67 5.59' NSO"45'Ol"E FL134 34.68' N41"38'32"E C67 50.00' 23.48' S05"11'03''E 23.26' 26"54'20" C151 1530.00' C68 1675.00' 29.29' N18"08'10"W 29.29' 1 "OO'OT' C152 1527.37' C69 1675.00' 42"17' N16"54'50"W 42"17' 1"26'33" C153 1527.37' C70 1675.00' 87.45' N14"41'49"W 87.44' 2"59'28" C154 1505.00' C71 1675.00' 30.00' Nl2'41'18"W 30.00' 1"01'34" C155 1505.00' C72 1675.00' 55.48' Nl1"13'35"W 55.47' 1"53'52" C156 1527.59' C73 27500' 41.91' N05"54'42"W 41.87' 8"43'55" C157 1273.68' C74 50.00' 51. 93' 531"18'OO"E 49.63' 59"30'32" C158 1530.00' C75 51.00' 98.59' N05"40'35"W 83.94' 110"45'21" C159 470.00' C76 51.00' 39.72' N72"00'42"E 38.72' 44"37'14" C160 470.00' C77 51.00' 44.96' 560"25'20"E 43.52' 50"30'43" C161 470.00' C78 51.00' 19.91' 523"59'03"E 19.78' 22'21' 51" C162 470.00' The C79 51.00' 11.40' 506"24'03"E 11.37' 12"48'07" C163 75.00' Engineering. Planning • Surveying Landscape Architecture. Urban Design C80 225.00' 35.97' N04"34'46"W 35.93' 9"09'32" C164 375.00' WLB Offices located in Tucson. Phoenix, C81 225.00' 4.39' N09"43'05"W 4.39' 1"07'08" C165 150.00' Flagstaff, AZ. and Las Vegas, NV. Group 4444 East Broodvvay C82 1625.00' 50.53' Nl1"10'06"W 50.53' 1"46'54" C166 150.00' Tucson, Arizona (520) 881-7480 C83 1625.00' 44.92' N12"51'04"W 44.92' 1"35'02" C167 25.00' C84 1625.00' 54.92' N14"36'40"W 54.92' 1"56'11" C168 1690.00' CURVE TABLE LINE TABLE LENGTH CHORD DI5T. DELTA LINE LENGTH BEARING 45.01' N16"22'22"W 45.01' 1"35'13" L1 1000' N80"45'Ol"E 3B.75' N1T50'58"W 38"75' 1"21'59" L2 1000' N80"4S'D1"E 16.53' N28"00'12"W 16.45' 18"56'29" L3 1000' N80"4S'OfE 20.64' N49"18'lO"W 20.50' 23"39'26" L4 16.24' N 71 "S2'27"W 30.44' 543"41' 29" E 29.97' 34"52'48" LS 1000' N15'32'01"W 39.Bl ' 503"26'37"E 38"76' 45"36'55" L6 1000' N1S'32'01"W 21.33' NOTOB'30"E 21.17' 24"26'42" L7 1000' N15'32'01"W 15.B4' N14"09'28"W 15.7B' 18"09'14" L8 10.00' N15'32'01"W 26.40' N23"42'OO"W 26.40' 0"55' 51" L9 S.04' S12'10'33"E 52.10' N25"05'03"W 52.10' 1"50'13" L10 10.00' S34"36'50"W 41.15' N26"43'41"W 41.15' 1"27'03" L 11 10.00' N49"10'23"E 55.26' 523"06'05"E 55.21' B"26'35" L12 10.00' SS6"00'OO"W 42.03' 515"40'OB"E 42.01' 6"25'19" L13 10,00' SS6"00'OO"W 52.04' 508"28'56"E 52.00' T57'05" L14 10.00' NS6 'OO'OO"E 42.33' 501"16'22"E 42.31' 6"2B'04" L 15 1000' S6S"24'23"W 52.44' 505"58'Ol"W 52.39' 8"00'42" L16 1000' N2T23'49"W 52.05' 513"56'57"W 52.01' T57'09" L17 1000' N24'10'S3"W 12.BO' 518"54'10"W 12.79' 1"57'18" L18 1000' N20'S9'34"W 39.42' N1 T44'59"E 39.41' 4'15'41" L19 1000' N1T4B'22"W 52.02' N12"48'26"E 52.00' 5"37'26" L20 4.22' S76"47'SS"W 17.25' N09"03'4T'E 17.25' 1"51'52" L21 10.00' S75'36'28"E 3.99' 500"21'15"E 3.99' 3"48'27" L22 1000' NlO'17'56"W 48.82' S24"51'30"W 47.48' 46"37'04" L23 10.00' Nl3"49'09"W 32.56' 563"42' 43"W 32.16' 31"05'22" L24 10.00' N1T20'33"W 24.56' N89'OO'58"W 24.39' 23"27'16" L2S 10.00' N20'53'42"W 12.90' N71"07'46"W 12.88' 12'19'09" L26 1000' N24'09'56"W 21.48' 587"39' 48"E 21.31' 24"36'34" L27 10.00' N22'3T54"W 6"90' N76"04'48"E 6.89' T54'15" L2S 1000' N1"41'39"W 37.90' N86'34'49"W 37.04' 42"35'01" L29 10.00' N73'24'OB"W 50.84' N36"43'48"W 48.76' 5T07'02" L30 1000' N73'24'OB"W 144.98' N73"16'08"E 1 00.86' 162"52' 49" L31 1000' S73'24'08"E 11.78' N32'02'35"W 11. 76' 13"30'14" L32 1000' N7S"21'31"W 31.91' N5T04'37"W 31.37' 36"33'49" L33 1000' N7S"21'31"W 41.54' 555"44'll"W 36"93' 95"12'39" L34 1000' S75"21'31"E 37.50' N09"59'OO"E 37.50' 3"42'18" L35 10.00' S75"21'31"E 19.03' 509"58'21 "E 18.58' 43"37'00" L36 1000' S75"21'31"E 19.01' 553"34'11"E 18.56' 43"34'40" L37 1000' S75"21'31"E 29.19' N8T55'06"E 28"77' 33"26'45" L38 10.00' S7S"21'31"E 24.03' N5T25'46"E 23"BO' 2T31'55" L39 12.76' S4,,54'SO"W 45.47' 569"12'26"W 43.98' 51'05'14" L40 85.87' N80"45'D1"E 45.01 ' N59"58'OO"W 43.56' 50"33'55" L41 13.31' S62"18'14"E 124.02' N34"58'43"E 95"64' 139"19'31" L42 8.00' S79"S4'09"E 0"73' N76"11' 46"W 0.73' 1"40'29" L43 11S.19' N10"00'OO"E 37.52' 559"58'26"W 34.10' 85"59'07" L44 B.OO' 579"54'09"E 70.82' 510"44'1 B"W 70.68' 12"29'07" 42.26' 543"55'52"E 37.41' 96"51'13" 61.12' N83"51'30"W 60,B9' 16"59'57" 22.83' N89"16'09"E 22.63' 26"09'46" 12.45' N69"03'20"E 12.42' 14"15'53" 44.56' 585"46'53"W 43.28' 4T43'OO" 43.48' N59'49'12"E 38.20' 99'38'23" 51.02' N41"33'57"E 50,89' 14"11'28" 66.86' N39"05'02"E 66"55' 19"09'19" 17.85' N31"59'18"E 17.84' 4"57'50" 16.41' N55'18'2B"E 16.41' 1"23'04" 64.50' N51"53'40"E 64.48' 5"26'34" 51.41' N4TOO'14"E 51.40' 4"20'17" 59.04' N42"20'38"E 59"02' 4"58'55" 48.58' N3T48'12"E 48.57' 4"05'57" 6.21' N20"59'47"W 6.21' 2"26'11" 44.61' N21 '51'52"W 44.61' 1"25'27" 54.63' N20"16'49"W 54,63' 1"44' 38" 44.66' N18"41'17"W 44.66' 1"26'28" 55.00' N1T04'48"W 55"00' 1"46'29" 42.00' Nl1 '16'21"W 42.00' 1"34'22" 52.00' N13"01'58"W 52.00' 1"56'51" 42.00' N14"47'35"W 42,00' 1"34'22" 52.00' N16"33'lT'W 52"00' 1"57'03" 42.00' N18"19'05"W 42"00' 1"34' 32" 52.00' N 20'05' 44" W 52.00' 1"58'47" 42.00' N21"53'06"W 42.00' 1"35'56" 52.01 ' N23"39'36"W 52.01' 1"57'03" 41.00' N25"29'18"W 41.00' 1 "50' 40" 33.33' N26"49'45"W 33.33' 1"14'53" 18.8B' 526"18'10"E 18.88' 2"18'04" 51.45' 522"00'58"E 51.43' 6"16'20" ') 63.95' 514"58'56"E 63,90' T47'43" ~121'~ 53.96' 507"47'44"E 53.93' 6"34'40" 53.31' N01"40'55"W 52.19' 40"43'33" 0.85' S2T23'17"E 0.85' 0"07'50" PETER D. 9.03' N06'05'l B"E 9.02' 3"26'51 " ~;u 9.50' N09"37'35"E 9.50' 3"37'43" 0"57' N76"00' 31"W 0.57' 1"17'59" "I II?"" 58.88' N 1 5 "11' 41 "w 58"87' 1"59' 46" EROSION LINE EHL 1 EHL2 EHL3 EHL4 EHLS EHL6 EHL7 EHL8 EHL9 EHL10 EHL11 EHL12 EHL13 EHL14 EHL1S EHL 16 EHL17 EHL18 EHL 19 EHL20 EHL21 EHL22 EHL23 EHL24 EHL2S EHL26 EHL27 EHL28 EHL29 EHL30 EHL31 EHL32 EHL33 EHL34 EHL3S EHL36 EHL37 EHL38 EHL39 EHL40 HAZARD SETBACK EROSION HAZARD SETBACK LINE TABLE LINE TABLE LENGTH BEARING LINE LENGTH BEARING 8.73' N53"13'12''E EHL41 9.45' N23"01'41"E 10.55' N26 '20'04''[ EHL42 11.75' N3T31'49"E 23.27' N12'44'54"E EHL43 15.29' N56"03'43"E 23.3S' N31'43'4fE EHL44 l1.3B' N74"20'10"E 10.29' N4 7'08' 4S"E EHL4S 39.85' N34'13'44"W 42.64' N09"11'32"E EHL46 10.85' N2T38'04"W 43.92' N14'06'S9"E EHL47 27.S6' N80"S6'23"E 7.80' N72'45'SB"E EHL48 5.79' N09"03'37"W 6.S9' S54"14'59"E EHL49 49.69' N16"19'47"W 14.01' N16'33'46"E EHLSO S3.41' N73"26'S5"W 31.25' N02"13'15"E EHLSl 10.1 l' N3B"49'35"W 19.98' N2S"29'41"W EHL52 11.73' N13"43'47"E 36.54' N16"31'35"W EHLS3 15.85' N14"24'29"E 8.09' N04"30' 41"E EHLS4 33.S7' Nl7'03'13''E 12.20' NSO"2B'09"W EHLSS 43.76' N14"34'24"E 7.64' N69"00'27"W EHL56 15.07' N06"33'36"W 17.83' Nl B"1 O'09"W EHL57 40.44' SB8"22'Sg"W 33. 75' N16"38'07"W EHL58 13.62' N45"49'52"W 18.23' Nl T3T13"W EHL59 100.75' NOO"S3'33"W lS.75' NlO"16'S2"W EHL60 40.43' Nl0"07'51"W 34.S7' N01"56'23"W EHL61 90.24' Nl4"48'56"W 17.85' NOS'lS'15"W EHL62 8.27' N41"32'09"W 42.S6' NOS"37'28"W EHL63 77.2S' N1T07'33"W 8.59' N02'S5'3S"E EHL64 279' N61"32'S2"W 88.79' N1S"24'07"W EHL65 9.76' S74'1O' 54"W 7.07' NOO'26'39"E EHL66 15.40' N65'24'16"W 97.5S' N16"23'00"W EHL67 90.25' N20'18'29"W 57.83' N60"55' 47"W EHL6B 35.10' N05"50'29"W 20.98' N02"41'02''E EHL69 39.34' NOS'10'S5"W 34.52' N26"18'43"W EHL70 37.13' N21"20'Ol"W 49.74' N 12"04' 49"W EHL71 66.09' N25"46'03"W 34.94' NOB"35'2S"W EHL72 67.96' N19"30'36"W 17.12' N2S"06'21"W EHL73 S4.86' N09"09'S3"W 64.3S' N6S'19' 51"W EHL74 29.89' N05"24'09"W 16.43' N06 'S3'09"E EHL75 14.64' N40"06'19"E 7.38' N18"S1'17"E EHL76 13.7T NBT13'31"E 27.91 ' N39"25'51"W EHL77 16.29' N4r17'50"E 20.62' N26"25'29"W EHL78 36.28' N13"OO'OO"E 12.01' N 10"27' 43"W EHL79 55.17' N7TOO'OO"W 13.73' NOT09'4S"E OV1214-2B FINAL PLAT MARACAY AT VIS TOSO RESUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 3 LOTS 1 THRU 101 AND COMMON AREAS BA-THRU B JB BEING A RESUBDI'YISiON Of MARACAY HOMES AT 'YISTOSO, BLOO<S 1 lHROUGH 5 AND COMMON AREA -A-AS RECORDED IN SEQ", 20142480246, BEING A PORlION Of SEClION 26 TOVttIISHIP 11 SOUlH, RANGE 13 EAST, G Be S"R.M. TOYIII Of ORO VAllEY. PIMA COUNTY. ARIZONA SHEET 5 OF 5 REF: OVl214-02 AUGUST 2014 SEQ. #: •• • o w (/l ~ ~ o G: I n "" u o m I > t>' /' n ~ OJ C o o o >-:::;; /' o ~ :r: (') w 3-o c() o c() <Xl :;;- Z Town Council Regular Session Item # D. Meeting Date:03/18/2015   Requested by: Amanda Jacobs Submitted By:Amanda Jacobs, Town Manager's Office Department:Town Manager's Office Information SUBJECT: Resolution No. (R)15-21, approving a financial participation agreement between the Town of Oro Valley and the Children's Museum Oro Valley RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Children's Museum Oro Valley will partner with the Town of Oro Valley to create a satellite museum that caters to families with young children. The museum will serve as an amenity for residents of Oro Valley and adjacent communities, and will promote and focus on early childhood education.   BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: The Town of Oro Valley will receive the following benefits:  Inclusion of Town exhibits without cost Town ownership of exhibits Access to the museum after hours to any department within the Town of Oro Valley for community outreach Museum sponsorship of concert series for children Increase in tourism Additionally, the Children's Museum Oro Valley will assist in the retention and attraction of businesses to the Town with a family-oriented resource/attraction that adds to the quality of life for residents, employers and employees. The Town will also capture sales tax revenue via incremental retail sales (food and beverage) from the museum's visitors travelling from nearby communities (Marana, Catalina and Tucson). FISCAL IMPACT: The agreement is effective from April 1, 2015, through December 31, 2019. The total fiscal impact of the agreement during this timeframe is $575,000. During the current fiscal year, FY 2014/15, the Town will pay the Children's Museum Oro Valley a one-time payment of $200,000 for exhibits, as well as a payment of $37,500 on May 1, 2015, for operating costs which were both budgeted in FY 2014/15. Thereafter, annual sums of $75,000, paid in monthly amounts of $6,250, will be distributed. Disbursement of funds by the Town will be subject to the annual appropriation by the Town Council and the limitations of the state budget law. SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to approve/deny Resolution No. (R)15-21, adopting the Financial Participation Agreement I MOVE to approve/deny Resolution No. (R)15-21, adopting the Financial Participation Agreement between the Town of Oro Valley and the Children's Museum Oro Valley. Attachments (R)15-21 Children's Museum FPA Children's Museum FPA C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 6\@BCL@540EBF90\@BCL@540EBF90.doc RESOLUTION NO. (R)15-21 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING A FINANCIAL PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY AND THE TUCSON CHILDREN’S MUSEUM DBA CHILDREN’S MUSEUM ORO VALLEY WHEREAS,pursuant to A.R.S. § 9-500.11, the Town may appropriate public monies for and in connection with economic development activities as long as there is adequate consideration; and WHEREAS, the Town desires to continue to promote a arts, culture and tourist environment in Oro Valley that enhances economic vitality and improves the quality of life for its residents; and WHEREAS,the Town of Oro Valley desires to enter into a Financial Participation Agreement with the Tucson Children’s Museum d.b.a. Children’s Museum Oro Valley (hereinafter Children’s Museum Oro Valley); and WHEREAS,it is in the best interest of the Town to enter into the Financial Participation Agreement with the Children’s Museum Oro Valley, attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference, to set forth the terms and conditions of the Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, that: SECTION 1. The Financial Participation Agreement between the Town of Oro Valley and the Children’s Museum Oro Valley, attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference, is hereby authorized and approved. SECTION 2. The Mayor and other administrative officials are hereby authorized to take such steps as necessary to execute and implement the terms of the Agreement. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 18 th day of March, 2015. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Dr. Satish I. Hiremath, Mayor 2 ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM: Julie K. Bower, Town Clerk Tobin Sidles, Legal Services Director Date: Date: 3 EXHIBIT “A” Town of Oro Valley FINANCIAL PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT 1 THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of , 2015, by and between the Town of Oro Valley, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called the "Town" and Tucson Children’s Museum, Inc. dba Children’s Museum Oro Valley, a non-profit corporation, hereinafter called the "Agency". WITNESSETH WHEREAS, it has been determined that the activities of Agency are in the public interest, and are such as to improve and promote the public welfare of the Town; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council have determined that to financially participate in the promotion of the activities of Agency is a public purpose in that the activities confer direct benefit of a general character to a significant part of the public. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties hereto do mutually agree as follows: Section 1: Statement of Purpose To partner with the Town of Oro Valley to create a children’s museum that caters to families with young children; to establish an amenity for residents of Oro Valley and adjacent communities that promotes and focuses on Early Childhood Education; and to assist the Town of Oro Valley in maintaining their designation as a Playful City Community and Best Place to Raise Kids in Arizona. Section 2: Benefits to the Town  Increase in Town Tourism;  Town ownership of all exhibits which sunsets at the end of the useful life of the exhibits;  Access to the museum after hours to any department within the Town of Oro Valley for community outreach;  Museum sponsorship of concert series for children Section 3: Services to be Provided by the Town All funding is subject to the Town’s budget appropriations. For this Agreement, the Town will provide payment as follows:  $200,000 as a one-time payment subsequent to execution of this Financial Participation Agreement (“FPA”);  $37,500 will be paid on May 1, 2015, as specified in Section 12  $75,000 per year for each subsequent year that this agreement remains valid. This amount will be broken into monthly payments as specified in Section 12. Town of Oro Valley FINANCIAL PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT 2 Section 4: Responsibility for Open Records Agency agrees to open to the public all records relating to any funds directly received from the Town that Agency distributes to any organization and/or individual. Section 5: Accountability Agency shall maintain a true and accurate accounting system which meets generally accepted accounting principles, and which is capable of properly accounting for all expenditures and receipts of Agency on a timely basis. In addition, Agency shall maintain evidence of its compliance with the nondiscrimination provisions of this Agreement. Agency’s accounting system shall permit separate, identifiable accounting for all funds provided by the Town pursuant to this Agreement. Agency shall provide the Finance Department of the Town, within four (4) months after the close of Agency’s fiscal year, a copy of the financial audit of Agency’s operations by an independent certified public accountant, along with any management letter and, if applicable, Agency’s plan for corrective action. If Agency does not have an audit, it shall submit within three (3) months after the close of its fiscal year, a complete accounting of Town funds received. This accounting must be approved by the Finance Department of the Town as sufficiently descriptive and complete. If for good reason Agency cannot meet the times established for submission of financial reporting, Agency shall notify the Finance Department in writing the reason for the delay, provide an expected completion date and request a waiver of the due date. At any time during or after the period of this Agreement, the Town Finance Department and/or a Town agent may audit Agency’s overall financial operation or compliance with the nondiscrimination clause of this Agreement for the Agreement period. Agency shall provide any financial reports, nondiscrimination policies and procedures or other documentation necessary to accomplish such audits. Section 6: Matching Grants Agency agrees to obtain Mayor and Council approval prior to applying for any matching grants involving the commitment of Town funds. Section 7: Nondiscrimination Agency, in its employment policies and practices, in its public accommodations and in its provision of services shall obey all relevant and applicable, federal, state, and local laws, regulations and standards relating to discriminations, biases, and/or limitations, including, but Town of Oro Valley FINANCIAL PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT 3 not limited to, Titles VI and VII of the Civil Rights Act o f 1964, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the Arizona Civil Rights Act, the Arizonans with Disabilities Act, the Human Relations provisions of the Oro Valley Code, and the Mayor and Council policy adopted on September 25, 2000, prohibiting the direct or indirect grant of discretionary Town funds to organizations that have a policy of exclusionary discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, ancestry, sex, age, disability, national origin, sexual orientation, gender identity, familial status or marital status. See Administrative Guidance Re: Non-Discrimination Policy for Programs Funded by the Town of Oro Valley, attached and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 8: Sub-recipient Funding Agreements Agency agrees to include in all of its sub-recipient funding agreements the nondiscrimination provisions contained in Section 8 herein. Section 9: Term of Agreement This Agreement shall be effective from April 1, 2015, through December 31, 2019. This Agreement may be extended at the sole option of the Town for additional fiscal year(s) only under the following conditions: A. The Mayor and Council of the Town determine the services of Agency are in the public interest and allocate funds therefore; and B. The parties mutually agree to a scope of services to be provided by Agency in any subsequent fiscal year. Any extension of this Agreement shall be memorialized in writing and signed by the Parties. Section 10: Payment Withholding, Reduction, or Termination The Town may withhold whole or part of the scheduled payment, reduce, or terminate funding allocations to Agency if: A. Services are not rendered. B. Agency fails to supply information or reports as required. C. Agency is not in compliance with agreed upon disbursement documentation and/or other project performance. D. Agency fails to make required payments to subcontractors. E. The Town has reasonable cause to believe Agency is not in compliance with the nondiscrimination clause of this Agreement. F. The Mayor and Council fail to appropriate all or part of the funds for this Agreement. Such payment reductions or payment termination may result in Agency receiving a lesser total Town allocation under this Agreement than the maximum funding allocated. If reasons for Town of Oro Valley FINANCIAL PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT 4 withholding payments other non-appropriation of funds have been corrected to the satisfaction of the Town, any amounts due shall be processed. The Town will be reimbursed for any funds expended for services not rendered. In addition, Agency shall return to the Town any Town funds provided pursuant to this Agreement that have not been expended by December 31, 2019. Section 11: Termination of Agreement This Agreement may be terminated at any time by mutual written consent, or by eit her party giving thirty (30) days written notice to the other party or at such time, as in the opinion of the Town, Agency's performance hereunder is deemed unsatisfactory. Section 12: Method of Payment The parties have agreed that Agency will receive up to $575,000. Disbursement of funds by the Town is subject to the annual appropriation by the Town Council and the limitations of the state budget law. Agency will receive a one-time payment for exhibits of $200,000. Additionally, Agency will receive a payment of $37,500 on May 1, 2015. An annual $75,000 will then be distributed monthly beginning July 1, 2015, for a monthly payment of $6,250. Section 13: Indemnification Agency agrees to indemnify, defend and save harmless the Town, its Mayor and Counc il, appointed boards, committees, and commissions, officers, employees, and insurance carriers, individually and collectively, from all losses, claims, suits, demands, expenses, subrogations, attorney's fees, or actions of any kind and nature resulting from personal injury to any person, including employees of Agency or of any subcontractor employed by Agency (including bodily injury and death); claims based upon discrimination and/or violation of civil rights; or damages to any property, arising or alleged to have arisen out of the work to be performed hereunder, except any such injury or damages arising out of the sole negligence of the Town, its officers, agents, or employees. Workers’ Compensation insurance and/or self-insurance carried by the Town do not apply to employees or volunteers acting in any capacity for Agency. Section 14: Independent Contractor The parties stipulate and agree that Agency is not an employee of the Town and is performing its duties hereunder as an Independent Contractor, supplying its own employees and maintaining its own insurance, workers’ compensation insurance and handling all of its own internal accounting. The Town in no way controls, directs or has any responsibility for the actions of Agency. Town of Oro Valley FINANCIAL PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT 5 Section 15: Insurance Agency agrees to: A. Obtain insurance coverage of the types and amounts required in this Section and keep such insurance coverage in force throughout the life of this Agreement. All policies will contain an endorsement providing that written notice be given to the Town at least thirty (30) calendar days prior to termination, cancellation, or reduction in coverage in any policy. B. The Comprehensive General Liability Insurance policy will include the Town as an additional insured with respect to liability arising out of the performance of this Agreement. C. Agency will provide and maintain minimum insurance limits as follows: COVERAGE AFFORDED LIMITS OF LIABILITY 1. Workers’ Compensation Statute 2. Employer’s Liability $100,000 3. Comprehensive General $1,000,000 - Bodily Injury and Liability Insurance -- Combined Single Limit Including: $100,000 Property Damage (1) Products and Completed Operations (2) Blanket Contractual D. Agency shall adequately insure itself against claims based upon unlawful discrimination and violation of civil rights. The cost of this insurance shall be borne by Agency. Section 16. Use of the Town Logo The Town Logo shall be used for the recognition of the Town’s contribution to Agency only. Section 17: Conflict of Interest This Agreement is subject to the conflict of interest provisions of A.R.S. § 38-511, et seq. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written. Town of Oro Valley FINANCIAL PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT 6 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, a municipal corporation __________________________ Dr. Satish I. Hiremath, as Mayor and not personally ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Julie K. Bower, as Town Clerk Tobin Sidles, as Legal Services Director and not personally and not personally Date: Date: Tucson Children’s Museum, Inc. dba Children’s Museum Oro Valley a non-profit Corporation _________________________________ Agency Representative and not personally Title_____________________________ State of Arizona ) ) ss. County of ) On this ___ day of ______________________, 2015, _____________________, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument, personally appeared before me and acknowledged that he/she executed the same for the purposes contained. Given under my hand and seal on , 2015. __________________________________ Notary My Commission Expires: Town Council Regular Session Item # E. Meeting Date:03/18/2015   Requested by: Bayer Vella Submitted By:Rosevelt Arellano Development Infrastructure Services Department:Development Infrastructure Services Information SUBJECT: Resolution No. (R)15-22, revision to the Stone Canyon II Final Plat for Lot 167 located at 1063 W. Tortolita Mountain Circle within Rancho Vistoso, Neighborhood 11, by removing a portion of the designated "no-build area" and allowing encroachment into 25% or greater slopes with appropriate mitigation as enabled in the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development (Attachment #1 updated on 3/13/15) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: In July 2013, the Town received a request to remove the "no-build area" and allow grading encroachment into 25% slopes on Lot 167 within Stone Canyon II. The original request was incorrectly approved by Town staff and subsequently rescinded. The owner of Lot 167, John Runewicz, then requested Town Council approval of a revised application. On February 4, 2015, this item was pulled from the Town Council agenda to allow the applicant time to address concerns received from the adjacent property owners. On February 16, 2015, Town staff facilitated a meeting with the property owner, adjacent neighbors and the Stone Canyon homeowners association to discuss the location of a proposed home on this site. At the end of the meeting, consensus was reached on all of the conditions in Attachment 1, Exhibit "A." The revised "no build area" (Attachment 3) and trade area (Attachment 4) meet all Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development requirements and reflect agreements between the neighbors. BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: The opportunity to build a home on this site is constrained by the topography, drainage and the no-build area established on the Final Plat. A recent site inspection and topographic survey has revealed that the existing no-build area does not contain significant ridges or rock outcrop features as intended by the Final Plat. However, the adjacent property owners are understandably concerned about view impacts if a building were to be placed in the no-build area. The applicant is requesting the Town Council approve the following changes: 1) Remove a portion of the no-build area shown on the Final Plat; 2) Allow encroachment into 25% slopes or greater. The following is an analysis of the applicant's request: Request No. 1 - Remove a portion of "no-build area" depicted on the Final Plat Request No. 1 - Remove a portion of "no-build area" depicted on the Final Plat On many of Stone Canyon residential lots, no-build areas were established on various final plats in order to ensure protection of rock outcroppings, significant ridgelines and areas of 25% or greater slope. At the time of approval, there was recognition via a note on the Final Plat that a lot-by-lot review would be needed to finalize the specific building area or "envelope." Site inspections have revealed that the no-build area does not contain any significant environmental resources such as rock outcroppings or severely angled slopes. Furthermore, the area proposed for building is the most suitable for construction on this site due to the presence of a wash within the front portion of the lot and other topographic features. The applicant and the adjacent property owners have agreed to retain a portion of the no-build area located outside the proposed grading limits. This agreement is reflected in the conditions of approval (Attachment 1, Exhibit "A") and depicted in Attachment 3.  Request No. 2 - Encroach into 25% or greater slopes The Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development (PAD) includes the regulatory provisions for hillside developments. These provisions are intended to protect the natural environment and disturbances within areas of 25% slopes or greater. The PAD allows encroachments into areas of 25% slopes or greater with the following provision:  Minor encroachments of up to 10 percent of the gradable area are allowed with an even trade area and Town Council approval. To ensure adequate mitigation, the PAD requires that the proposed trade areas are of equal (or greater) size and quality. 1. The Final Plat enables grading up to 20,000 sq. ft. (excluding driveways), so Town Council has discretion to enable up to 2,000 sq. ft. (i.e. 10% of gradable area) of encroachment into 25% slopes with a suitable trade area. To satisfy the PAD requirement, the applicant proposes the following improvements as depicted in Attachment 4:  Total area encroachment into 25% slopes or greater = 1,998 sq. ft. or 9.98% Required trade area = 1,998 sq. ft. Proposed trade area = 3,725 sq. ft. In summary, the proposed trade area exceeds the 1:1 trade area requirement of the PAD. To preserve the existing views and help screen the proposed home from the adjacent lots to the west, the applicant and the adjacent property owners have agreed to several conditions related to re-vegetation, provision for a 1:1 slope and establishing a no-build area along the western side of the garage and most of the driveway. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to APPROVE the revisions to the Stone Canyon II Final Plat for Lot 167 abandoning a portion of the no-build area and permitting encroachment into 25% or greater slopes, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1, Exhibit "A," finding that the request meets Town requirements. or I MOVE to DENY the encroachments into 25% or greater slopes and revisions to the Stone Canyon II Final Plat for Lot 167, finding that _____________________________________. Attachments Attachment 1 - (R)15-22 Final Plat Amendment for Lot 167 Stone Canyon II Revised Attachment 2 - Areas of 25% or greater slope Attachment 3 - Revised "no-build area" Attachment 4 - Trade areas for slope encroachment RESOLUTION NO. (R)15-22 A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO LOT 167 OF THE STONE CANYON II FINAL PLAT, AT 1063 W. TORTOLITA MOUNTAIN CIRCLE, WITHIN RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 11, BY ABANDONING A PORTION OF THE DESIGNATED “NO BUILD AREA” AND ALLOWING ENCROACHMENT INTO 25% OR GREATER SLOPES WHEREAS, in 1987 the Town of Oro Valley approved the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development District (the “PAD”). The PAD contains a policy for the Very Low Density Residential (“VLDR”) land use classification requiring that building envelopes for individual lots shall identify and avoid significant natural features; and WHEREAS, in 2000 the Town approved the Final Plat of Stone Canyon II, Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11, Lots 135 through 234, recorded in the Office of the Pima County Recorder, Book 53 of Maps and Plats, Page 48-1, and 48-6 (the “Plat”). A “no-build” area is depicted on Lot 167 of the Plat, which is subject to the PAD’s VLDR densities and development standards; and WHEREAS, in 2002 the Town amended the PAD, Section 1.3.J, affirming that development in areas of naturally occurring slopes of 25% and greater is generally prohibited, but allowing limited encroachment into such areas upon satisfaction of certain stated criteria; and WHEREAS, in July 2013, the Town received a request to remove the platted “no-build area” for Lot 167 at 1063 W. Tortolita Mountain Circle within Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11 a request that was incorrectly approved by Town staff and subsequently rescinded; and WHEREAS, on February 16, 2015, Town staff facilitated a meeting with the property owner, adjacent neighbors and the Stone Canyon homeowners association to discuss a proposed home on Lot 167 that would require Town Council approval of a 25% slope encroachment and a plat amendment to remove a portion of the “no-build area.” The parties agreed to the proposed actions subject to conditions laid out in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated by reference. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley that: SECTION 1.The Mayor and Council hereby approve encroachment into a 25% or greater sloped area on Lot 167 of the Plat, subject to the conditions as stated in Exhibit “A.” SECTION 2.The Mayor and Council hereby approve an amendment to the Plat to abandon a portion of the “no-build area” for Lot 167, subject to the conditions stated in Exhibit “A.” PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 18 th day of March, 2015. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ___ Dr. Satish I. Hiremath, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ___ Julie K. Bower, Town Clerk Tobin Sidles, Legal Services Director Date: Date: ___ Exhibit “A” Conditions of Approval General: 1.The Town Council resolution and exhibits associated with this request shall be recorded with the Pima County Recorder’s Office. Slope Encroachment: 2.The maximum building heights from the finished floor elevation for two-thirds of the building shall not exceed 14’-4” and the remaining third of the building shall not exceed 17’-6”. 3.The finished floor elevation of the house shall be lowered 1’ foot to an elevation of 3043.87 as depicted on Exhibit “A-1.” 4.The property owner shall install a 1:1 cut slope using a natural rock design on the west side of the proposed home as depicted on Exhibit “A-1.” The Town Engineer shall review and approve the proposed grading plans for soil stability. 5.To help screen the proposed garage and driveway and preserve the existing views from the west, the following shall be achieved within the disturbed area bounded by the most northern and southern points of the 1:1 cut slope running along the west property line: a. The property owner shall provide sufficient landscaping to obscure the view of the proposed garage and driveway as determined by the Planning and Zoning Administrator. b. All plant materials at maturity shall not exceed the height of the proposed home. 6.The 1:1 trade area for the proposed slope encroachment shall be set aside as permanent natural open space as shown in the areas depicted in Exhibit “A-2.” “No-build Area”: 7.The property owner shall retain that portion of the platted “no-build area” located along the south property line and outside the grading limits as depicted in Exhibit “A-3.” Exhibit “A-1” Grading Plan Finished Pad Elevation and 1:1 Slope ! -j !. !I ,: I' ,I '>: i !~ ~~ • " C5 , ~ i 0 , ! , , I , ! , -, . I·' I ~. ~ , IHiI' I 0 r i I' iilli i I 1.1 ! HHlii 0-' ! .... '. 0 [ • , • .. • r , • , • • • , " , , ; t!i! ,!. ~"! •• . s~i: -.- Exhibit “A-2” Trade Areas for Slope Encroachment <t -~-" -". -/ \ :. • \ .> '> // ( ( , w~/ j , , , "" , S"ot.t ," •• ," N Q 6l!U D IlWlf AR&! q ! c MEA NO . 1 -1.587.7J SF AADo NO. 2 _ 2.r J 6.9J SF TRAO£ AR(iI. -J72 ~.6 6 SF __ , NO BUILD AREA -TRADE CALC tJ LOT 167 S TON E CANYON I BOOK 53, PAGE 4 8 S EGI~ 200 00 ( 1063 ...,. TO RTOLITA MO UNTAIN D fiJII SII .. ,f", '" ,... ~ ~ ::= ~ ... " 5 March 2015 A.F. Sterling Homebuilders AS No. 14060 I II t L EGAL DESC RIPTION FOR THE ABANDONMENT OF A NO BUILD AREA ON LOT 167 All that portion of Lot 167 of Sto ne Canyon II , Ran c ho Vistoso Neighborhood II Lot s 13 5 through 234, Common Area "A" and Co mmon Area "B" recorded in Book 53 of Ma ps and Pl a ts at Page 48 , Records of Pima County, Arizona , more particu la rly d esc ribed as fo ll ows : COMMENCING at the s outhwes t corner of sa id Lot 167 ; THENCE N 89 °57'20" E along the so uth line of said Lot 167 , a di s ta nce of79.1 0 feet; THENCE le avi ng said south lin e N 37 ° I 0'58" E, 39.3 1 feet ; THENCE N 12 °53'34" W , 19.56 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING ; THENCE continuing N 12 °53'34" W , 24.13 fee t ; THENC E N 4r40'0 1" E, 3 1.95 feet ; THENCE N 38 °01 '07" W , 5 1.98 feet ; THENCE N 02 °20'13" W, 15 .51 feet; THENCE S 85 °04'28" E, 16 .25 feet ; THENCE S 32 °32'57" E, 79.58 feet; THENCE S 50 °52 '43" W, 2 5.31 fe e t; THENCE S 07 °11'38 " W, 23.31 feet ; THENCE N 74 °32'55" W , 22.85 feet to th e POINT OF BEGIl\TN ING. Containin g 2,629.82 square fee t o f land, more o r less. The ba s is of bearing for this Lega l De sc ription is based on Do c ke t 8178 , Pa ge 1966 , ce nt e rline of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard , sa id bearin g be in g S 32 °09'07" E. as shown o n sai d Sto ne Ca nyo n Plat. SCALE: 1"=40' 1 N C. '\ \ /\ I !( I ~ / "6.25'1 S85'04'28 "E 79.10' N89'57'20"E 1 -I "\ 1 " AREA NO .1 I' " 1 1 GRADING ~I LIMITS I PER PL AN J / N74 '3;Z'55 "W 22.85 '\ <D ~ ", '" ~--b--/ ... 216.73 / / / / I I I ARE A NO.1: AB ANDONED NO BUILD AR EA 2629,82 SF Camp Lowell Corporate Center 4552 East Camp Lowell Drive Tucson, Arizona, 85712 Fax: 325-8703 520-325-5883 SKHCH TO DePICT A LeGAL DeSCRIPTION FOR THe ABANDONMENT OF A NO BUILD AREA ON LOT 167 STONE CANYON /I BOOK 5~ PAGE 48 SEQI 20000630042 RECORDS OF PIllA COUNTY, ARIZONA ASI '4 060. R£V.IIAR .. 20'S,PII, SHEET 1 OF 1 ~'\ So .., ,p .. '" '" ~ ~ == :;:: ... c, I II l LEGAL DESCRIP T ION FOR A NEW NO BU ILD AREA ON LOT 167 5 Mar ch 2015 A.F. Ster lin g Ho mebuilders AS No. 14060 All that portio n of Lot 167 of Stone Can yon II , Rancho V istoso Neighborhood 11 Lots 135 throug h 234, Common Area "A" and Co mmon Area "B" recorded in Book 53 of Maps a nd Plats at Pa ge 48, Pim a Co unty, Reco rds of P ima County, Ar izo na, mo re particu lar ly describ ed as fo ll ows : COMMENCING at the no rth eas t corne r of sa id Lot 167; THENCE S 12 °03 '44" W along the easte rl y lin e of sa id Lot 167 , a di stance of50.62 feet; THENCE leav in g sa id easterly lin e N 77 °56'16" W, 20.00 feet to a point on a curve throug h whi ch a radial line bears S 10 °40'02" W a nd the POINT OF BEG INNING; THENCE northweste rl y a long a cu rve concave to the northeast havin g a radiu s of 380.00 fee t and a centra l a ng le of 16 °3 0'28"and a le ngth of I 09.48 feet to he re in afte r Point A; THENCE N 27" I 0'30" E a long a radial lin e 20 .00 feet; THENCE so uth eas te rl y a lo ng a c ur ve co ncave to the north east having a radiu s of 360.00 feet and a ce ntra l ang le of 16 °35'07" and a le ngt h of 104.2 1 fe e t to a po int of non tan ge ncy ; THENCE S 12 °03'44" W , 20.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINN,ING. Co ntaining 2,136.93 sq uare feet of land, more or less. Together with that portion of Lot 167 , m ore part icu la rl y described as fo ll ows: COMMENCING at afore m e ntioned Point A; THENCE S 64 °58'27" W, 45.70 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING ; THENCE S 12 °13'34 " W , 45.74 feet; THENCE S 25 °35'50 " W, 56.81 feet; THENCE S 06 °3 1 '24" W, 10 .94 feet; THENCE S 62 ° 41 '51 " E, 3 1.82 feet; THENCE S 80 °57'56" E, 13.84 feet; THENCE N 52 ° 14'18" E, 10 .06 feet to the west lin e of t he no bui ld area p e r said recorded p lat; jJII S{j '-> -f;- '" '" ~ ~ ::=. .:0::-... '" f II , THENCE S 12 °53 '34" E, 10 .63 feet; THENCE S 89 °57'20" W, 66.09 feet; T HENCEN 18 °49'22" E, 138.00 feet ; THENCE S 59 °37'03" E, 5.52 feet to t he POI T OF BEGfNNfNG. Co nta inin g 1,587.73 sq uare feet ofland, mo re or less. The bas is of be aring for thi s Legal Desc ription is ba sed o n Docket 8 178 , Pa ge 1966 , centerlin e of Rancho Vi stoso Boulevard, said bearing be in g S 32 °09'07" E. as. s hown o n sa id Sto ne Ca nyo n Plat. Prepared by: AMERSON SURVEYfNG, fNC. ~~A MICHAEL K. AMERSON , P.L.S. SCALE: 1"=40' ( S89'57'20"W N89' 57' 20"E 216.73 AREAS (sF): AREA NO 1: AREA NO.2' NEW NO BUILD AR EA NEW NO BUILD AREA " GRADING ~I / LIMITS / PER PL AN ~/ / / 1.567.73 SF 2.136.93 SF N7T56'16 "W 20.00' ~~~~~~~-:SSiK(££TCH TO DEPICT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION FORA Lowell Corporate Center East Camp Lowell Drive Tucson, Arizona, 85712 Fox: 325-8703 520-325-5883 NEW NO BUILD AREA ON LOT 167 STONE CANYON /I BOOK 53. PAGE 4B SEOI 20000630042 RECORDS OF PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA ASI 14060, REV.MAR,2015,PM, SHEET f OF f Exhibit “A-3” Revised Final Plat “No-build Area” <CJoL[ ...... NQ fJIII ID 68ft! ENC ROACH MENT G!.!Cl II AllON -,>,REA OF £NCRCW:H M£NT _ 2 ~29 .82 SF -RcrAiN£D NO BUJLD AREA -933 _74 SF TOTAl. NO BUIW AREA PER PLAT -J.S65 _!i6 SF NO BU ILD AREA DISPLA r LO T 157 STONf CANYON /I BOO K 5 3, PAG E 48 sm ll 200 006300 4 2 10 6 3 V. TO RTOLITA MOUN T AIN DRiVE j [;::::] SCALE 1'=20' 20' 20' 20' EXISllNG CONTOUR INllERVAL-2' PR OPOSED CONTOUR INllERVAL-l' ~~r~;~' ~;(r:.~ ,.. &W-=..,,=' -~~ :,;; ~~"'l ~ -----~#':t~¥--i=~:!~ ~=:::=:,.=--="':'-::'-=-'::"'~ ~=. !~~-~ SE5 :....-:..-::,:.t":-:..::-..::-... -a.- .. _-..... -----------..... -._----_ .... -....---!:n.~~or~~==~~ ........ DONOTtmN..1IED11EM'FtMClACMlllIR£RIlmNrOlll I"OVIM)fTSlMAMI.CWHtfL1.OIIlNfYLGCoCOItIHP't c:oHCQrIrMTO I'\DW ISNrffICIMltD. ,.,.AUATIONOC1M.J l.f.OCW'ETHtaTftNCEAfl..£Al1,OAXTJlIOWTHETOtOIF STDJ"Sl.CID If4OH£NI.YI,f;\fl.1HAOUGHIlUI'R'S1.LNIimt. Z,OCA1MMCH~Y'INCHEIDEEPNrfO"INCHD WIOl. OR AV-Tftf1rlCH.lN TKUN!: Qf'nt[ rna:. ~.OIWt~KCUNl.YAlt.J:,loST"IItCHDINlOlH[~ ONlHlOOWH5l.OPlSll£OfTltQrDt. .. JlCtIlOSfSA/l&AXlMl..ll:OI' tOn:n"'IIfr ... f'tNC[IS~~~.rtETFDTRA IITlIf)rfa1'ttr~lSlJIC)wntOII'SoW'CIRfWlll(. ADroIlCf5P'llClt01'ONaPOSTSNLDWP'OImAUJHG:1HE' """"""" 5r!~,L~~~al:~A -:w...":F~ nHCD "fJIODIC,IUy 1WJ.tf1tJ' fACH ~r:ea~~OR"Nf("""'1CtOM[ 3. IIO«M IUIWDK Df1'OSrr1 ~y 10 I"tIQW)( MnUATE SfOMIXYCU.lWEF'OItTH(fQTMN1HJIIQUC[ .... OM fOtCIL TNClc::M(lC).'frIJOIOUNODtIIMNtMOfUCltOUNHGCIDrHOUf. ~~~~~~= ~y;rr...uzm.Ifr"P£'crm.ANCl~ClA'D(ANO Jf.wJZ[ lH£ DlrnJMa> MEA AI ..... IN lHf "«CWlON I'Wt. CONTACT JEFF GEREKE 2200 E. RIVER RD . STE. 105 (520) 577-7800 STANDARD GRADING NOTES I. CUT = 1,0Sll CY I F'ILL = 995 CY 2. BASIS Of BEARINGS' BEARINGS BASED ON DOCKET 8170, PAGE 1966 CENTERLINE Of RANCHO VISTOSO BOULDEVARD. SAID BEARING BEING S32'09'07'E 3. BASIS Of ELEVATIDNo ADOT DATUM BENCHMARK, BRASS DISK HEADVALL 70' RIGHT Of STATION 710+20 APPRO XI MATELY 300' SOUTH (Jf THE NORTH 1/4 CORNER Of SECTION 5 , T-II-S. R-H-E. ELEVATION = 26aa.03 4. UNIMPROVED DISTUR BED AREAS RESULTING fROM OPERATIONS ON THIS LOT SHALL BE RESTORED TO THEIR NATURAL STATE BY UTILIZING DROUGHT-RESISTANT VEGETATION AS STATED BY THE TOWN Of DRD VALLEY ZONING CODE . ALL UTILITY TRENCHES ANDIOR LEACH fIELDS ARE TO BE RESTORED TO THEIR ORIGINAL NATURAL CONDITlONS. 5. EXCESS SOIL GENERATED fROM EARTHVORK OPERATIONS SHALL BE REMOVED fRDM THE SITE AND LAVfULL Y DISPOSED Of' DR, If ALLOVED AND APPROVED BY THE TOVN ENGINEER . SITE MATERIALS MAY BE PLACED SO AS TO BECOME AN INTEGRAL PART Of THE SITE DEVELOPMEN T. ALL IN ACCORDANCE VITH THE HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS . fG=3044.20 "=3044.87 .illIlfD m EXIST PHONE PEDESTAL OJ EXIST. TRANSfORMER • EXIST. CABLE PEDESTAL • EXIST. VATER METER OJ EXIST. GAS HOOKUP ® DECO BLOCK ORAIN OPEN ING (4) ItNERT OUT 3040.10 c::::J AREA GRADED WtTHN as)! IIR GREA TER SlOPES 5X fOR rl~~~O;U~~OH -I ~ 6. ALL ROOf' DRAINAGE VILL DE CONTROLLED BY SPLASH PADS AND lOR RIVER ROCK. TYPICAL GRADING AROUND HOUSE 7. CUT AND fILL SLOPE AND SLOPE TREATMENT TO BE IN COMPLIANCE VITH THE REQUIREMENTS Of THE ACCEPTED GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER ING INVESTIGATION OR THE TOVN Of ORO VALLEY REVEGETATION REQUIREMEN TS. a. EXCESS SOIL MATERIALS GENERATED rROM THE EARTHVORK OPERA TIONS SHALL NOT BE DISPOSED Of BY PUSHING DR PLACI NG SAID MATERIAL INTO THE AREAS DE SIGNA TE D AS 100 YEAR fLOOD PLAIN AREAS . ~. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE fOR ASSURING PROPER AND ADEDUATE DRAINAGE . 10. ELEVATION OF FINISH PAD SHALL BE CERTIFIE D BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR PRIOR THE POURING fOUNDATIONS . A COPY Of THE CERTIfICATION MUST BE Aff&Illl.EJl BY THE TOVN Of ORO VALLEY INSPECTION AND COMPLIANCE DIV IS ION PRIOR TO CALLING fOR BUILDING INSPECTIONS. II. THE GROUND IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE F'DUNDATIDM SHALL BE SLOPED AVAY fRDH THE BUILDING AT A SLOPE Of NOT LESS THA N ONE UNIT VERTICAL IN 20 UNITS HORIZONTAL (S-PERC[NT SLOPE) rtJR A MINIMUM DISTANCE Of 10 fEET MEASUlED PERPENDICUAR TO THE VALL. If PHYSICAL OBSTRUCTIONS DR LOT LINES PRlJ1IBIT 10 fEET Of HORIZONTAL DISTANCE. A 5-PERCENT SLOPE SHALL BE PROVIDED TO AN APPROVED ALTERNATIVE METHOD Of DIVERTING VATER AWAY "RDM THE fOUNDATlDM . SVALES USED fOR THIS PURPOSE SHALL BE SLOPED A MINIMUM Of 2-PERCENT WHERE LOCATED WITHIN 10 fEET Of THE BUILDING FOUNDATION • 12. ADDITIONAL GRADING INfORMATION< fiNISHED SLOPES MUST CONfORM TO THE F'DLLOVING TOWN ZONING CODE RESTRICTlNS, _3,1 (HDRIZONTA LNERTICAL) DR flATTER SHALL BE REVEGETATED _SLOPES 2<1 DR fLATTER BUT STEEPER THAN 3,1 SHALL BE STABILIZED VITH ROCK RIPRAP OVER fILTER fABRIC . _SLOPES STEEPER THAN 2,\ SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH GROUTED RlPRAP OR RETAININ G VALLS AS APPROPRIATE. SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED [.1. -ALTERNATIVE METHODS Of STABILIZATION MAY BE ALLOIoiED wHEN SUPPORTED BY A GEOTECHNICAL REPORT PREPARED BY AN ARIZONA REGISTRANT. 13. PRIOR TO ANY BUILDING fiNALS. A fiNAL GRADING INSPECTION MUST BE OBTAINED fROM THE TD'w'N Of ORO VALLEY. CALL THE ORO VALLEY INSPECTION AND CDHPLIANCE DIVISION AT (520) 229-4898 fOR fOR A fINAL GRADING INSPECTION AT LEAST 24 <TWENTY-fOUR) HOURS IN ADVANCE . H. ACS = .0023 x I x L I PAD AREA (AC RES ) ACS = .0023 x I x 579.05 I 0.10 ACS = 13.32% 15. ARIZONA GAME AND rrSH DEPARTHANT'S GUIDELINES fOR HANDLING DESERT TORTDlSE SPECIMANS SHALL BE fOLLOVED If THESE ANIMALS ARE ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION 16. LANDSCAPING VITHIN THE DRIVEVAY SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE Of ALL HOMES IS LIMITED TO 30 INCH MAXIMUN HEIGHT fOR ALL SHRUBS AND GROUND- COVER AND THAT ANY TREES PLANTED VlTHIN THE SIGHT VISIBIlITY TRIANGLE ~~~~~:~~:~~~1::.:~~.~~~:~~~~~:~:~~:~1 EVEL TOTAL ~GRADING Of 25% AND GREATER SLOPe = 1.997.82 sr. TOTAL ALLDII'ED CO.OOG sr IJt( 2870 2860 2 8 50 ~rs 2870 2860 2850 OWNER/DEVELOPER 2 840 2840 A.F. STERUNG HOMES ~I 3275 W. INA ROAD STE. 220 .J, TUCSON, AZ. 85741 .J, (520) 225-6800 0+00 1+00 2+00 Attachment 2 TOPO IS BASED ON DRIGINIU. AERIN. FDR STONE: CANYON N WHICH ~ 8ffN fI£LI) VERIFIED FOR ACCURACY BY AMERSON StJRIoEYlNG GRADING / 25% SLOPE DISPLAY FOR LOT 167 STONE CANYON /I LOTS 135-234 CONTAINING 46,020 SF -1.06 ACRES BOOK 53, PAGE 48 SEQ# 20000630042 MODEL 2940 1063 'vi . TORTOLITA MOUNTAIN DRIVE u. o I- W ~ / / / RETAlN£l) NO BUILD loR£'. Attachment 3 SCA LE 1'=4 0' NO BUILD AREA ENCROACHMENT CALCULATION -AREA OF ENCROACHMENT = 2629.82 SF -RETAINED NO BUILD AREA = 935.74 SF -TOTAL NO BUILD AREA PER PLAT = 3,565.56 SF NO BUILD AREA DISPLA Y LOT 167 STONE CANYON /I BOOK 53, PAGE 4 8 SEQ# 20000630042 106 3 'vi , TORTOLITA MOUNTAIN DRIVE / / / TJW)E ARFA NO.1 I. 104.29 79.10 ~) ( NO BUILD TRADE AREA CALC \ '> (4P 589' 57 20 W 216.73 -TRADE AREA NO. 1 = 1,587.73 SF -TRADE AREA NO .2 = 2,136.93 SF -TOTAL TRADE AREA = 3724.66 SF TOTAL TRADE AREA OF 3,724.66 SF MINUS AREA OF ENCROACHMENT 2,629.82 SF EQUALS 1,094 SF ADD'L NO BUILD AREA Attachment 4 '.58 RADING UlIITS j ~ SCA LE 1'=40' NO BUILD AREA -TRADE CALCULA TlON LOT 167 STONE CANYON /I BOOK 53, PAGE 48 SEQ# 20000630042 1063 1,./, TDRTDLITA MOUNTAIN DRI V E Town Council Regular Session Item # F. Meeting Date:03/18/2015   Requested by: Kristy Diaz-Trahan Submitted By:Kristy Diaz-Trahan, Parks and Recreation Department:Parks and Recreation Information SUBJECT: Resolution No. (R)15-23, authorizing and approving an archery Shooting Range Development Grant Agreement between the Arizona Game & Fish Department and the Town of Oro Valley in the amount of $5,000 for the purchase of materials to construct a shade canopy at the Naranja Park archery range RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of accepting the Arizona Game & Fish Department grant in the amount of $5,000. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Arizona Game & Fish Department (AZGFD) offers Shooting Range Development grants to encourage the development and improvement of shooting ranges. The Town of Oro Valley has been successful in that $30,000 in grants have been received over the past three years to begin the development and support of the Naranja Park archery range. The AZGFD continues to be supportive of this project and has agreed to an additional $5,000 grant.  BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: The Arizona Game & Fish Department was very supportive of Town of Oro Valley’s desire to construct an outdoor archery range. In 2012, the AZGFD provided the Town with $15,000 seed money grant to begin the development of the archery range.  In 2013, AZGFD awarded an additional $15,000 grant to the Town for the installation of a shade canopy.  The AZGFD continues to support this project and has awarded an additional $5,000 to continue the installation of shade canopies.  FISCAL IMPACT: The Town will receive $5,000 in grant funds, and the capacity to expend these funds is included in the FY 14/15 budget.  SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to (approve or deny) Resolution No. (R)15-23, authorizing and approving an archery Shooting Range Development Grant Agreement between the Arizona Game & Fish Department and the Town of Oro Valley in the amount of $5,000 for the purchase of materials to construct a shade canopy at the Naranja Park archery range. Attachments (R)15-23 AZ Game & Fish Grant - Archery Range Exhibit A Exhibit A RESOLUTION NO. (R)15-23 A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, AFFIRMING THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY’S AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING AN ARCHERY SHOOTING RANGE GRANT AGREEEMENT BETWEEN THE ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT AND THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS TO CONSTRUCT A SHADE CANOPY AT THE ARCHERY RANGE AT NARANJA PARK IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,000 WHEREAS,the Arizona Game and Fish Commission under A.R.S.§17-231.4 has authorized the establishment of an archery Shooting Ranges Development Policy providing financial assistance for the development of shooting ranges for public purposes; and WHEREAS, in May of 2014 the Town of Oro Valley submitted an archery Shooting Range Development Grant proposal to secure necessary funding for the construction of a shade structure for the Naranja Archery Park; and WHEREAS, the Town of Oro Valley desires to enter into a Grant Agreement with the Arizona Game and Fish Department to receive $5,000 towards the development of Naranja Archery Park, more specifically to purchase materials to construct a shade canopy; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the Town to enter into the Grant Agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference, in order to set forth the terms and conditions to provide for the health, safety, and welfare of the residents of the Town of Oro Valley. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, that: 1.The Grant Agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit “A”, between the Town of Oro Valley and the Arizona Game and Fish Department to receive funding to purchase materials to construct a shade canopy at Naranja Archery Park is hereby authorized and approved. 2. The Mayor, Parks and Recreation Director and other administrative officials are hereby authorized to take such steps as necessary to execute and implement the terms of the Grant Agreement. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 18th day of March, 2015. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY: ________________________ Dr. Satish I. Hiremath, Mayor ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM: _________________________________________________________ Julie K. Bower, Town Clerk Tobin Sidles, Legal Services Director Date: ______________________Date: _________________________ EXHIBIT “A” Arizona Game and Fish Department Shooting Ranges Development Grants Project Agreement Summary Sheet Project number: 15-07582-02 Project name: Shade Structure for Naranja Archery Park Project coordinator: Nancy Ellis, Town of Oro Valley Project period: From: October 1, 2014 To: April 1, 2016 Description: Funding for the purchase of materials to construct shade canopy. Notations: Awarded funding is only for the purchase of materials to construct the shade canopy. Per conversation with Nancy in May of 2014, this partial/additional funding will combine with previous funding to complete the canopy project. Commission award: $5,000.00 Page 2 of 9 Shooting Range Grant AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE ARIZONA GAME AND FISH COMMISSION AND THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY This Shooting Range Grant Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into between the Arizona Game and Fish Commission (“Commission”) and the town of Oro Valley (“Grantee”) (collectively “Parties” and singularly “Party”) pursuant to A.R.S. § 17-231 (B)(7). The terms “Department” and “Director” refer to the Arizona Game and Fish Department and its Director, acting as administrative agent for the Commission. WHEREAS, the Commission may expend funds to provide training in the safe handling and use of firearms and safe hunting practices pursuant to A.R.S. 17-231.B.4; WHEREAS, the Commission has a formal Policy, A2.19, for Shooting Range Development; WHEREAS, Policy funds from the Commission are provided to the Participant on a 50:50 matching basis; WHEREAS, the Commission recognizes the limited use of the Town of Oro Valley’s Archery Range, prohibiting the discharge of firearms and allows only archery pursuant to A.R.S. 17-231.B.4; WHEREAS, the Commission believes it is important to collaborate with other agencies or organizations in conserving Arizona’s wildlife and preserving Arizona’s wildlife heritage; WHEREAS, the Commission wishes to foster this valuable relationship by granting funds to the Grantee to carry out the project(s) set forth in the Grantee’s approved grant application (“Application”), which is incorporated herein and attached as Attachment A, in accordance with the terms of this Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above premises, the Parties hereto agree as follows: I. The Commission agrees that the Department shall: 1. Provide to the Grantee $5,000.00 to carry out the project(s) set forth in the Grantee’s Application. The grant monies are only to be used for the purchase of materials to construct the shade structures as specified in the application. No other use of the funds is authorized. The Department recognizes that Naranja Park Archery Range operated by the Town of Oro Valley is an archery only shooting Page 3 of 9 range and firearms are prohibited. The Grantee shall place all grant monies received in a non-interest bearing account. 2. Not reimburse the Grantee for items other than those defined in this Agreement. II. Grantee shall: 1. Provide match share towards total project costs in the form of cash, donations of equipment, materials, land acquisition, and labor, which shall equal or exceed the Commission’s Award. 2. Deposit all amounts received under the terms of this Agreement to appropriate account(s) for project(s) under the name and number of the project and use such non-interest bearing funds to fulfill the purposes set forth in the Grantee’s Application. Should the Grantee use funds provided to it under this Agreement for purpose(s) other than those set forth in the Grantee’s Application, this Agreement shall terminate automatically and the Grantee shall return to the Department all misappropriated and unused funds. The Grantee shall not use grant funds for the purpose of producing income. The Grantee shall not use grant funds to pay compensation in excess of the established salary for any permanent employee. The funds shall be expended only for grant work as authorized under the terms of this agreement 3. Maintain full accounting of all actual expenses associated with completing this project and provide copies to the Department as requested. 4. Publicly acknowledge that Commission funds were used to assist project accomplishments. All materials prepared in the performance of this Agreement shall be acknowledged as having been funded by the Arizona Game and Fish Department. 5. Install a permanent sign that credits the Commission and contains the official Department logo and states that funding for the project(s) has been provided by the Commission at the project site. 6. Submit quarterly project status reports that include the following information: 1) Progress toward completing approved work; 2) An itemized, cumulative project expenditure sheet; 3) Any anticipated delays or other problems that may prevent on-time completion of the project; 4) Any additional information that the Department requests in accordance with this Agreement. Page 4 of 9 7. Design and construction of the Project shall conform to the plan submitted with the Participant’s application. Any changes in the approved plans must be approved in writing by the Statewide Shooting Range Administrator. 8. Operate and maintain grant-assisted capital improvements, provide reasonable protection of any project improvements, and ensure that reasonable public access (as defined in application) is maintained for a minimum of ten (10) years after completion of the project during the Term of Public Use. 9. Return to the Department any unused monies upon completion of the awarded project. The Grantee may make a written request that the Department award the unused monies for an additional project that is consistent with the original scope of work. The Department will consider the request and notify grantee of its determination within thirty (30) days of receipt of written request. 10. Shall make available the Project improvements free of charge for State Hunter Education and Safety, Archery Education and Scholastic Clay Target Programs (as applicable to the type of range being granted monies) and for general use by the public during reasonable hours. A nominal fee (as defined in application) may be charged for public use of the range. III. The Commission and the Grantee mutually agree and understand that: 1. At its discretion, the Department may conduct periodic on-site inspections of the project(s) as needed. 2. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and the Grantee’s Application, the terms of this Agreement shall govern. 3. This Agreement shall become effective upon the date of final signature and shall continue for a period not to exceed 18 months. This Agreement may be amended at any time by mutual agreement of the parties in writing. It may be terminated by either party upon thirty (30) days written notice to the other Party. Upon termination, the Grantee shall cease all work performed pursuant to this Agreement and return any unused funds to the Department. 4. The Parties may amend the terms of this Agreement by mutual written consent. The Department shall prepare any approved amendment in writing, and both the Department and the Grantee shall sign the amendment. An amendment lacking a required signature is invalid. 5. The DEPARTMENT may temporarily suspend grant assistance under the project pending required corrective action by the GRANTEE or pending a decision to terminate the grant by the DEPARTMENT by notifying the GRANTEE in writing. Whenever one party to this contract in good faith has reason to question the other party's intent to perform, he or she may demand that the other party give Page 5 of 9 a written assurance of this intent to perform. In the event that a demand is made and no written assurance is given within ten (10) days, the demanding party may treat this failure as an anticipatory repudiation of the contract. 6. The DEPARTMENT may terminate the project in whole or in part at any time before the date of completion, whenever it is determined that the GRANTEE has failed to comply with the terms or conditions of the grant. In case of default, the DEPARTMENT will provide written notification. The GRANTEE will have ten days to correct the default or show cause. The DEPARTMENT will promptly notify the GRANTEE in writing of the determination and the reasons for the termination, together with the effective date. All payments made to the GRANTEE shall be recoverable by the DEPARTMENT under the project terminated for cause. 7. The DEPARTMENT or GRANTEE may terminate grants in whole, or in part, at any time before the date of completion, when both parties agree that the continuation of the project would not produce beneficial results commensurate with the further expenditure of funds. The two parties shall agree upon the termination conditions, including the effective date of the termination and, in the case of partial termination, the portion to be terminated. The GRANTEE shall not incur new obligations for the terminated portion after the effective date, and shall cancel as many outstanding obligations as possible. The DEPARTMENT may allow full credit to the GRANTEE for the grant share of noncancelable obligations properly incurred by the GRANTEE before termination. 8. The DEPARTMENT may require specific performance of the terms of this agreement or take legal steps necessary to recover the funds granted if the GRANTEE fails to comply with the terms of the grant or breaches any condition or special condition of the grant agreement. 9. The remedies expressed in this agreement are not intended to limit the rights of the DEPARTMENT. This agreement shall not in any way abridge, defer, or limit the DEPARTMENT'S right or remedy under law or equity that might otherwise be available to the DEPARTMENT. 10. If the GRANTEE violates state law or this agreement, the DEPARTMENT may seek recovery of all funds granted and classify the GRANTEE as ineligible for Shooting Range Development Grant Funds for a period not to exceed five (5) years. 11. The Grantee is subject to the Department's on-site monitoring inspections to validate grantee's compliance with the Grant Agreement. All open grants (ongoing), closed grants (within 10 years of grant closure) and grants still within the “term of public use” are subject to Department monitoring inspections. When a Department monitoring inspection discovers the Grantee's default or non- compliance with the terms of the Grant Agreement, the Department will provide Page 6 of 9 written notification to the Grantee, and the Grantee will have ten business days to correct the default or non-compliance. The Department may pursue any remedy if the Grantee fails to correct the default or non-compliance within the period to correct, unless the Grantee can show good cause for not correcting the default or non-compliance. 12. Remedies may include repayment of the grant if the GRANTEE fails to provide for operation and maintenance of the equipment, facilities or product of any shooting range grant funded project during the Term of Public Use. The GRANTEE shall reimburse the shooting range grant fund 100% of grant monies. 13. All written notices concerning this Agreement shall be delivered in person or sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the Parties as follows: A. For the Commission and Department: Statewide Shooting Range Administrator Shooting Sports Branch Arizona Game and Fish Department 5000 W. Carefree Highway Phoenix, Arizona 85086 B. For the Grantee: Multimodal Planner Town of Oro Valley Parks and Recreation Department 680 W. Calle Concordia Oro Valley, AZ 85704 14. In carrying out the terms of this Agreement, the Parties agree to comply with Executive Order 2009-09 prohibiting discrimination in employment, the provisions of which are incorporated herein by reference. 15. Pursuant to A.R.S. § 35-214, all books, accounts, reports, files, electronic data, and other records relating to this Agreement shall be subject at all reasonable times to inspection and audit by the State of Arizona for five (5) years after completion of this Agreement. 16. The GRANTEE shall use equipment purchased with grant funds for a public purpose for the useful life of the equipment, or surrender the equipment to the DEPARTMENT upon completion of the project, whichever comes first, if the equipment purchased with grant funds has an acquisition cost of greater than $500. If the equipment is sold, the GRANTEE shall pay the DEPARTMENT the amount of any resulting proceeds in the ratio equivalent to the funds provided for the purchase. Page 7 of 9 17. To the extent required under A.R.S. § 12-1518, the Parties agree to use arbitration to resolve any dispute arising under this Agreement, with each Party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 18. Unless the GRANTEE is a State agency, or an agency of the United States of America, the GRANTEE shall indemnify, save and hold harmless the DEPARTMENT, and the State of Arizona, its agents, departments, officers and employees from all claims, loss, damage, liability, expense, costs, and charges incident to or resulting in any way from any injuries or damage to any person or any damage to any property caused by or resulting from the issuance of or the performance of services rendered as part of this agreement. 19. Assignment-Delegation: No right or interest in this contract shall be assigned by the GRANTEE without the prior written permission of the DEPARTMENT, and no delegation of any duty of the GRANTEE shall be made without the prior written permission of the DEPARTMENT. 20. This Agreement is subject to termination for conflict of interest pursuant to A.R.S. § 38-511. 21. This Agreement shall terminate automatically if funds necessary to carry out this Agreement are not allocated or available to the Commission or the Department. In the event of such termination, the Commission and the Department shall incur no obligation or liability to the Grantee under this Agreement. 22. This Agreement in no way restricts either Party from participating in similar activities with other public or private agencies, organizations, or individuals. 23. All work performed pursuant to this Agreement shall be in compliance with all applicable state and federal laws and regulations. If Grantee violates state or federal law or this Agreement, the Department shall seek recovery of all monies awarded and classify the Grantee as ineligible for grant monies for a period not to exceed five (5) years. 24. The attached Application and estimated cost sheet is hereby incorporated and becomes a part of this Agreement. 25. It is understood by the Parties that the Grantee is an independent contractor with respect to Arizona and not an employee of the Department. The Department will not provide fringe benefits, including health insurance benefits, paid vacation, or any other employee benefits to the Grantee. 26. Grantee’s employees and or volunteers, if any, who perform services under this Agreement are bound by the provisions of this Agreement. At the request of the Page 8 of 9 Department, the Grantee shall provide adequate evidence that such persons are the Grantee’s employees or volunteers. 27. Grantee acknowledges its obligation to obtain appropriate insurance coverage for the benefit of the Grantee (and Grantee's employees and or volunteers, if any). The Grantee waives any rights to recovery from the State of Arizona, the Commission or the Department for any injuries or property damage that the Grantee (and/or Grantee’s employees or volunteers) may sustain while performing services under this Agreement and that are a result of the negligence of the Grantee or Grantee's employees and or volunteers. 28. If Grantee contracts with a third party or subcontractor, the Grantee shall be responsible for ensuring said third party’s or subcontractor’s compliance with the terms of this Agreement, and Grantee shall be responsible to the state of Arizona, the Commission and the Department if the third party or subcontractor defaults or violates any terms or conditions of this Agreement. 29. The Parties agree to comply with Executive Order 2005-30, "Ensuring Compliance with Federal Immigration Laws by State Employers and Contractors," the provisions of which are hereby incorporated by reference. 30. Special terms and conditions, if any, will be attached hereto as Attachment B are hereby incorporated into this Agreement. Page 9 of 9 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date below: TOWN OF ORO VALLEY _____________________________ Dr. Satish I. Hiremath, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________________ _____________________________ Julie K. Bower, Town Clerk Tobin Sidles, Legal Services Director ______________________________________ [Date] ARIZONA GAME AND FISH COMMISSION ______________________________________ Larry D. Voyles Secretary to the Commission Director, Arizona Game and Fish Department ______________________________________ [Date] Town Council Regular Session Item # 1. Meeting Date:03/18/2015   Requested by: Bayer Vella Submitted By:Michael Spaeth, Development Infrastructure Services Department:Development Infrastructure Services Information SUBJECT: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN, LANDSCAPE PLAN, AND USE OF THE RECREATION AREA IN-LIEU FEE OPTION FOR A 3-LOT SUBDIVISION LOCATED NORTH OF DESERT SKY ROAD, APPROXIMATELY ONE-QUARTER MILE WEST OF ORACLE ROAD RECOMMENDATION: The Conceptual Design Review Board (CDRB) has recommended approval of the Conceptual Site Plan and Landscape Plan. Staff is recommending approval of the Recreation Area In-lieu Fee option, subject to the condition listed in Attachment 1.   EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant's proposal is to develop an approximate 0.71 acre property into a 3-lot single-family subdivision. The applicant's proposal (Attachment 2) includes: Three (3) single-family residential lots Maximum building height of 28 feet or two (2) stories Substantial preservation of existing native plants Rainwater harvesting basins in landscape buffer yards and common areas The applicant is also requesting to utilize the Recreation Area In-lieu Fee option to satisfy the Zoning Code recreational area requirements. The Conceptual Site Plan and use of the Recreation Area In-lieu Fee option, subject to the condition listed in Attachment 1, have been deemed consistent with all applicable Zoning Code requirements. The CDRB considered the applicant's Conceptual Site Plan and Landscape Plan request on January 13, 2015, and has recommended approval. The CDRB staff report is included as Attachment 3 and the minutes are provided as Attachment 4.  BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: Land Use Context   The property is zoned R-4. A zoning map for the area is provided as Attachment 5. The proposed land use is consistent with the zoning, which permits single-family residential development.   Site Plan  The subject property encompasses approximately 0.71 acres and is currently vacant. The applicant’s proposal (Attachment 2) is to develop three detached single-family homes with lot sizes ranging from approximately 8,500 sq.ft. to 11,700 sq.ft. The site will utilize a shared private driveway and will include sidewalks along the Desert Sky Road frontage.   The Zoning Code establishes a driveway separation standard of at least 150’ as a traffic safety requirement to maintain motorist visibility and minimize traffic conflicts between access drives. The proposed location of the applicant's access drive would not permit a driveway to the neighboring parcel that is in conformance with the Zoning Code. A condition was recommended by staff to the CDRB, requiring the applicant provide a cross-access easement to the adjacent parcel to eliminate this potential conflict (Attachment 3).   On January 13, 2015, the CDRB’s recommendation included removing staff’s condition requiring a cross-access easement and requested staff and the applicant to work with the adjacent property owner to resolve the issue. Staff coordinated a meeting between the applicant and the neighboring property owner shortly after the January meeting. During the meeting, staff discussed the possibility of the neighboring property owner filing a Minor Land Division application to adjust their lot line as an alternative to requiring the cross-access easement. The property owner was amicable to the idea and will request a lot line adjustment.   Recreation Area In-lieu Fee Option   The applicant has requested use of the Recreation Area In-lieu Fee option enabled by the Zoning Code, which requires approval by Town Council. The applicant has provided a Recreation Area In-lieu Fee proposal (Attachment 6). The In-lieu fee calculation, provided by the applicant, contains a minor error and therefore a condition has been included in Attachment 1 that requires the correct amount.    The Conceptual Site Plan and the Recreation Area In-lieu Fee option request, with the condition listed in Attachment 1, is consistent with all applicable requirements of the zoning code.   Landscape Plan (see Attachment 2) The Conceptual Landscape Plan complies with all applicable Zoning Code requirements. Noteworthy items include: Preservation of a majority of the existing native vegetation on-site Several drainage basins for rainwater collection 15 ft. landscape buffer yard along Desert Sky Road PUBLIC PARTICIPATION   Summary of Public Notice   Notice to the public was provided consistent with Town-adopted noticing procedures, which includes the following:  Letter to all property owners within 600 ft. Letter to all individuals that attended the neighborhood meeting Posting at Town Hall All registered HOA’s Neighborhood Meetings   Two neighborhood meetings were held concerning the applicant’s proposal, which included the following primary discussion topics:  Compatibility with neighboring properties Drainage Building height Noise Parking A copy of both neighborhood meeting summaries has been included as Attachment 7.   Additional comments have been received by staff and have been included as Attachment 8.   Conceptual Design Review Board The CDRB considered the applicant's Conceptual Site Plan and Landscape Plan request on January 13, 2015, and has recommended approval. As discussed previously, the CDRB's recommendation included eliminating the cross-access easement condition and exploring an alternative solution with the applicant and the neighboring property owner. The CDRB staff report has been included as Attachment 3 and the minutes have been provided in Attachment 4. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to approve the requested Conceptual Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Recreation Area In-lieu Fee for the proposed 3-lot subdivision, subject to the condition listed in Attachment 1, finding the request is consistent with the Design Review Principles and Standards of the Zoning Code. OR I MOVE to deny the requested Conceptual Site Plan, Conceptual Landscape Plan and Recreation Area In-lieu Fee, finding that the request is not consistent with the Design Review Principles and Standards of the Zoning Code, specifically _____________________________________. Attachments ATTACHMENT 1 - CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ATTACHMENT 2 - APPLICANT PROPOSAL ATTACHMENT 3 - CDRB STAFF REPORT ATTACHMENT 4 - CDRB MINUTES ATTACHMENT 5 - ZONING MAP ATTACHMENT 6 - RECREATION AREA IN-LIEU FEE PROPOSAL ATTACHMENT 7 - NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING SUMMARIES ATTACHMENT 8 - RESIDENT COMMENTS Attachment 1 Conditions of Approval Town Council March 18, 2015 Planning Conditions 1. Revise the Recreation Area In-lieu Fee proposal to the correct amount of $8,022.00. " 1-800-STAKE-IT "OV1214-27 LINDA VISTA BOULEVARD 13 13 1313 THIS PROJECT R-4 R-4 R1-7 R-4 R-6 R1-43 R1-36 R-4 R1-144 14 14 18 18 24 2423 19 121214 07 0 30 60 " 1-800-STAKE-IT "OV1214-27 0 20 40 UTILITY KEYNOTES <!> NEW 6" FH 'MTH 6" VALVE, (35 LF.) CONNECT TO EXIST. 6" WATER MAIN (PN. 85-12) o NEW (3)-1" WATER SER'v1CE STUBS (FOR FUTURE WATER METERS) o NEW 6" PRIVATE SEWER TO CONNECT TO EXIST. 8" PVC (G-85-52) EXIST. INV= 2593.69 o EXISTING SEWER M.H.' 1 (G-85-52) RIM=2611.38, E. INV= 2593.59 & W. INV=2593.67 (CONTRACTOR TO LOWER OR RAISE PER FINISHED GRADE) I EXIST. WA TERSHED BOUNDARY EXISTING WALL I ~ NEW PRIVATE 6" HCS, (178 LF. AT 1"l «> NEW PRIVATE CLEAN-OUT NO. 1 ~~----------------------------~ <2> NEW PRIVATE CLEAN-OUT NO.2 ~ NEW 4" PRIVATE HCS o EXISTING SEWER M.H., 1 (G-2DD5-043) RIM=2611.34, W. INV= 2592.94 & E. INV=2592.91 4$ NEW ELECTRICAL PEDESTAL KEYNOTES ill MAIN DETENTION BASIN, DEPTH=I.2 FT. 'MTH 3: 1 SIDE SLOPES AND PONDING DEPTH=4". (j) WATER HARVESTING, 4" MAX WATER PONDING. Q) DEPRESSED 4' SIDEWALK FOR DRAINAGE. 8' X 4.5' GROUTED ROCK RIP-RAP (D5O=6" EMBEDDED 1/2 D50 INTO 5" THICK CONCRETE OVER FIBER MESH) @ NEW STOP SIGN. (§) NOT USED. ® BASIN OUTFLOW Q1DD OUT=3.6 cfs. Q1DD EXISTING= 3.7 cfs. ill OUT FLOW WEIR GROUTED ROCK RIP-RAP (D50=6" EMBEDDED 1/2 D50 INTO 5" THICK CONCRETE OVER FIBER MESH). SEE DETAIL 1 THIS SHEET. ® 30' 'MDE PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT BY FINAl.. PLAT. ® NEW 6" 'MDE BY 12" DEEP CONCRETE HEADER. @ NEW 15' BUFFERYARD "A" ® NEW 4' 'MDE STABILIZED DECOMPOSED GRANITE PATH (FLUSH TO AC PAVEMENT) @ 4' 'MOE SWAl..E TO CONVEY REAR LOT DRAINAGE (1.2 CFS) @ 8' X 6' GROUTED ROCK RIP-RAP (D50=6" EMBEDDED 1/2 D50 INTO 5" THICK CONCRETE OVER FIBER t.tESH) ® 48 LF. OF NEW 3.5' TALL DECORATIVE SCREEN WALL. PER PC/COT SD.# 109 1 TURN EVERY FIFTH BLOa< ON ITS SIDE TO ALLOW DRAINAGE TO PASS. I \ UN-DEVELOPED LAND DKT 12817, PG 5431 9791 N DESERT SKY RD R4 ZONING EXHIBIT B~ INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT \ DKT 12720 PG 00232 \ \ \ ~. \ \ \ \ \~?b \ ?I]--ABANDONMENT OF EASEMENT ~ \ FOR PRNATE INGRESS/EGRESS \ \ YARD SETBACK LINE DKT 13393 PG 00368 \\ \ -ti-\~\~ \ : ....... . " . .s \ . . '. \ \_~ _ _ 2 \.--\.l:llit-+rc~+-' \ /~/ U-I--=''--'11 \ / ....... ~ . ~ .. " :", -:'~ . '. -.,.~'.~ . . . . :.-w ~.: . . ;I" . ..~ .:... ~ ..... . '.. .. '-.. " ..... ~. .~.-.:. '", . . .. . . ~ . . ... .. .... :' ~~ , . " .. ' • • ~." .•• 0' FND ACP 1.0" (WALL) 11-,---6' PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT BY FINAL PLAT '''--..., 1-1t;+J11~---r-YARD SETBACK LINE r [XIST. "'SIN -: '" / I / ./ .. ~~ r--...:r-..: ~~ t?'S / ' DESERT SKY LOTS 1-45 & COMMON AREA "A" BOOK 59 PAGE 96 ~ """" •• C()- .r-, .!"'> -.... p~ 88 (lHI) \ \ \ ~ 11--'0' PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT BY FINAL PLAT \ 11l..--·F)(I'.c;mlr. WALL \ \ GROUTED ROCK RIP-RAP (D50=6" EMBEDDED 1/2 D50 INTO 5" THICK CONCRETE OVER FIBER MESH \~~~~--~~~~ .. \ .. ~: PRIVATE INGRESS/EGRESS, ~~-o/L.' '.. UTILITY AND PRIVATE \~~~~rr ~:~~N~t~~~~J:;~·~B.~12~·28 $==a=;t11~2 4 r [XIST. BASIN J 3' 4' 3' BOTTOM OF WATER 4" PONDING HARVESnNG AREA COMPACTED WATER SUBGRADE TO 95% HARVESTING DENSITY (TYP) CD OUT FLOW WEIR DETAIL N.T.S. -,~ -;; i' 4" (MAX) --..... Ji ~ DEPRESSED AREA j'-'" FOR WATER -I~ [,..- ~ 'J! HARVESTING , ~ C G Q (J D~ - G ~ lL. COMPACTED _J SUBGRADE TO 6' l' NEW 4' WIDE STABILIZED DECOMPOSED GRANITE PA 11H SEE PLAN FOR LOCA-nDN VARIES 12.0' to 16.0' ru ~ ~ '" ~ .. ," .. , 2"'3 ii) e:: " 't:' ;; ~ 51 95% DENSITY® PRIVA TE SHARED DRIVE WA Y SECTION (TYP) 2 . 1"=10' a ~ THICKENED EDGE PAVEM[NT o PA VEMENT THICKENED ED~~s. OK T 12817, PG 5431/ 9797 N DESERT SKY IRD / .....• DRAINAGE EASEMENT ••...• BY FINAL PLAT "', ----------,) " ~6!'" ", ' ", J 0 \"- \ \ \ \ , \ .. --w----~~ SUNS TONE ESTA TES BK. 46, PG. 71. ZONING BOUNDARY ---w----- r=::S-:-:",T[::::::::=A==RE::::A=-==O'-. =71'-'A=C=. =::.....::; \ Q100 [XIST,=3.7 cfs \ QIO EX/ST.=1.7 cfs \ \ QIOO DEV. *=3.6 cfs \ QIO DEV. *.=1.7 cfs * DISCHARGE OUT OF BASIN -w--ZONING EXIST. ROAD STRIPING PROPOSED GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN BAILEY'S DESERT SKY LOTS 1-3 • C() O\£R 2' EXISTING CMU WALL (TO REMAIN IN PLACE DESERT SKY LOTS 1-45 & COMMON AREA • A" _t----=-B"'-00:c...K 59 PAGE 96 100-YEAR FLOW DEPTH=0.50' CD SWALE AT REAR OF LOTS N . T .s. REFERENCES: PIMA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MONUMENT TIE SHEHS. HORIZON HEIGHTS, BOOK 15 OF MAPS & PLATS AT PAGE 84. ORO VALLEY HEIGHTS, BOOK 29 OF MAPS & PLA TS A T PAGE 26. BOOK 32 OF SURVEYS AT PAGE 91. HORIZON HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUMS, BOOK 38 OF MAPS & PLATS AT PAGE 79. DESERT SKY, BOOK 59 OF MAPS & PLA TS A T PAGE 96. SUNS TONE ESTATES, BOOK 46 OF MAPS & PLATS AT PAGE 71. ASSESSORS PARCEL MAP 224-33-010B RECORD OF SURVfY BOOK 54 PAGE 58 EXISTING SEWER G-81-030, G-85-052 & G-2005-043. IN Expires: 9/JO/17 , I I / , I / / / / / I I I I I \ SCALE, 1'=20' c.I. = 0.5' H -------/ I I I I I ----w---~- PERRY ENGINEERING 505 WEST WETMORE ROAD TUCSON, AZ 85705 CONTACT: KEN PERRY, P.E. PHONE: 520.620.9870 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN BAILEY'S DESERT SKY LOTS 1,2 AND 3 (LANDSCAPE, BUFFERYARD AND DRAINAGE) LOCA TED IN A PORTION OF BLOCK 4 OF HORIZON HEIGHTS, IN BOOK 15 OF M&P IN PAGE 84. SECTION 13. T-12-S, R-13-E, G&SRB&M, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY. ARIZONA SCALE: 1" = 20' CONTOUR INTERVAL= 0.5' 2 JANUARY 27, 2015 SHEET 2 OF DESERT SKY Lots 1, 2 & 3 Common Area "A" (Landscape, Bufferyard and Drainage) Located in a Portion of Block 4 of Horizon Heights, BK 15 of M&P, PG 84, Section 24, T-12-S, R-13-E, Town of Oro Valley, G&SRM, Pima County, AZ 11047 N. Cloud View Place Tucson, AZ 85737 (520) 877-8037 fax (520) 877-8079 0'10'20'40'60' Scale: 1" = 20' North North \ \ ~ \ ZONING \j / 0 ...... :>q \ 'r"\ J _-~~?-0-SR 1',./ \ r// \.... -....---_---_-2613.5--\ -.,.. ...... /36"~a)(-/ ....--...... TOS#19 --------PIP #17 DKT 12817, PG 5431 9791 N DESERT SKY RD R4 ZONING \ \ 36" Hill" ~'''' \ ~~\ \ WATER HAf!VESTING AREA lF1---:, ----''''12.0--\..-~<...: '" '" TOS#25 '" -- PIP TWO STOR #30 \ ONE OR TWO PIP871'J~ -- --- \ '-, " I I I \ / / \ R ZONI / / ,- / / DESERT SKY LOTS 1-45 & COMMON AREA "A" BOOK 59 PAGE 96 \ \ ~-Vli~TER HARVESTING i I I --- I I I =; ::;;::;:-;;;t.~~~-;:-;"..~;..-;..;:~~7J, AREA #2 I DKT 12817, PG ft431 9797 N DESERT/SKY RD /' ----- Sight -- r/// 7/// " / -~ , , '" "'---~ - - - - - - - ---I \ \ ~~~~~~\~~~~+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 15' wide Bufferyard ~ " DESERT SKY R1-7 -, ZONING \ BUFFER YARD REQUIREMENTS , , SOUTH PROPERTY LINE -DESERT SKY ROAD 15' WIDE BUFFERYARD "A" @ 103 LF = 1,545 SF ITEM REQUIRED PROVIDED TREES 4 6 SHRUBS or CACTUS 5 5 ACCENTS or CACTUS 10 10 TOS#29 / I -s / / '-Siah! Visibility Triangle -----r----- LANDSCAPE NOTES 1. All bare dirt areas to be covered with minimum 2"thick, 1/2" -3/4" screened rock, or hydroseed per the speCifications on this sheet, including areas within the right-of-way. 2. All plants shall be irrigated with a permanent underground irrigation system --see sheet L-2. 3. Landscape areas shall be depressed a maximum of 4" for rainwater harvesting. Areas must drain within a 12-hour period. 4. The Property Owner shall be responsible for maintenance of the required landscape and irrigation system in perpetuity. 5. Materials within the sight visibility triangles shall be placed so as nol to interfere with a visibility plane described by two horizontal lines located 30 inches and 72 inches above finished grade of the roadway surface. LANDSCAPE LEGEND ALL PLANT MATERIAL TO MEET OR EXCEED ARIZONA NURSERY ASSOCIATION SPECIFICATIONS TREES SIZE Cercidium microphyllum Foothills Palo Verde TOS QTY 2 Olneya tesota Desert Ironwood 36" Box 4 m ~ C ~ §] 1<+1 Prosopis velutina Native Mesquite SHRUBS I ACCENTS CeRis pallida Desert Hackbeny Caesalpinia pulcherrima Red Bird of Paradise Dasylirion wheeleri Desert Spoon Hesperaloe parviftora Red Yucca GROUND COVER / HARDSCAPE 1/2' -3/4' Screened Rock Desert Rose -2" min thickness Hydroseed Per Specifications Sheet L-3 TOS 9 PIP 4 TOS 1 PIP 2 SIZE QTY 5Gal 2 5Gal 3 5Gal 3 5Gal 7 ADDITIONAL PLANTS REQUIRED PER SRI MITIGATION: Ambrosia deltoidea 1 Gal 5 T riangleleaf Bursage Baileya multiradiata 1 Gal 3 Desert Marigold Calliandra eriophylla 1 Gal 5 Fairy Duster Encelia farinosa 1 Gal 7 BriHlebush WA TER PLAN CALCULA TlONS WATER INFILTRATION PLANT CANOPY CALCULATIONS Water Harvesting Infiltration Area #1 (1 ,280 sf) Species Quantity Radius Area Desert Iro nw ood 7 12.0 3165.12 Bri tl lebush 7 1.5 49.4 6 Fairy Dus ter 5 2.0 62 .8 0 Desert Mari Qol d 3 0 .5 2.36 Tr ia nQle leaf Burs aQe 5 1.0 15.7 0 Red Yucca 2 2.0 25.1 2 TOTAL PL AN T CO VERAGE 3320.55 60% for Ca Icu lati on 1992.33 WATER INF ILTRATION PLANT CANOPY CALCULATIONS Water Harvesting Infiltration Area #2 (2 ,363 sf) Species Quantity Radius Area Foo thills Palo Verde 2 10.0 628 .00 Desert Iron woo d 4 12 .0 180 8.64 Ha ck ber ry 2 5.0 157.00 Desert Spoon 3 2.5 58.88 Re d Yucca 5 2.0 62.80 Red Bi rd of Parad ise 3 3.0 84.7 8 TOTA L PLA NT CO VERAGE 2800.10 60 % for Ca Icu lati on 168006 I I PLANT WATER DEMAND BY MONTH: TOTAL AR EA #1 Annua l Plant Wat er De mand (gaL ) 11 974 A REA #2 A nnua l Plant Water De mand (Qal.) 10 ,920 I TOTALS 22 ,894 Town of Oro Valley Landscape Plan approved by: Planning & Zoning Administrator SCALE 1" = 20'-0" CONTOUR INTERVAL = 6" GRS ARQ-IITECT5,LLC I Jan I GENERAL NOTES 1. Gross acres of site: 0.71 acres 2. Existing Zoning: R-4 3. Zoning of adjacent properties: North, West and East = R-4 South = Rl-7 4. Property Bufferyards: North Property -No Bufferyard Required West Property -No Bufferyard Required East Property -No Buffferyard Required South Property -15' Bufferyard "A" S. South side of property is adjacent to Desert Sky Road, which is designated as a public street. This requires a lS' Bufferyard "A". 6. The property owner is responsible for maintaining the required irrigation system as long as necessary in order to transition plants over to natural sources. All required landscape, irrigation, buffering, screening and rainwater harvesting system improvements shall be maintained per Section 27.6.E.4 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code. 7. The property owner shall maintain all plants within the bufferyards to ensure unobstructed visibility to motorists. All shrubs, accents and groundcovers within sight visibility triangles shall not exceed 2 feet in height. Trees will be maintained to ensure that branches and canopy foliage is not below a height of 6 feet. B. Design enables adequate plant spacing to ensure survivability at plant maturity. 9. Prior to release of landscape assurances, a registered landscape architect shall certify that all plant material meets the minimum standards contained in the current editions of the Arizona Nursery Association's Growers Committee Nurserymen as to size, condition and appearance. 10. Monthly irrigation demand is calculated using a monthly percentage of water requirements per plant canopy sizes in each public planting area. These calculations are based on methodology provided by the City of Tucson Rainwater Harvesting Ordinance. 11. Irrigation provided for landscaping shall be reduced by SO% after 5 (fIVe) years from the date of issuance of the certificate of occupancy. This reduction shall be acccmplished by the use of depressed basins and water harvesting, as shown on the Rainwater Harvest Plan, Sheet L-3. Vegetation located in buffer yards shall nol receive irrigation water after 5 (five) years from certificate of occupancy date (100% reduction). WATER HARVEST AREA Water Harvesting Infiltration Area (WHIA) Number 1 2 Totals PLANT WATER DEMAND 1% HiQ h Use Plants 0 0 I % Mo dera te Use Plants 0 2 I % Lo w Use Plants 0 4 3 I % Very Lo w use Pla nts 99.6 95 Plant Ca no py A rea (60 % of Matu re Size ) 1,992 1,68 0 3,672 Wa ter Deman d (Verti ca l Fee VYe ar) 0.80 0 .8 7 A nnua l Pla nt Wa ter De mand (Q al.) 11 974 10920 22894 I I (Yearly wa ter de mand aga i nst monthl y percentage of deman d) I I Feb March April May June July August Sept Oct 467 563 922 1245 1 53 3 1 628 1 44 9 1 221 1 114 886 42 6 5 13 84 1 1,13 6 1,398 1,487 1,321 1,114 1,01 6 808 893 1,076 1,763 2,38 1 2,930 3,116 2,770 2 ,33 5 2,129 1,694 I Nov Dec 551 407 502 371 1,053 77 8 Project Number: OV1214-27 LANDSCAPE PLAN Date Date: 1/27/15 o D.IIIII' R ...... L-1 Projlot Number: o ConltruatJan DoauIll«lW 14012 IlII Agency Qlbmlttal Dluw" by: LMW o ConltruatJan s.t OIedcecI by: GRS IJI Not for Conltructlan 1or3 Conceptual Site Plan Conceptual Design Review Board CASE NUMBER: OV1214-27 MEETING DATE: January 13, 2015 AGENDA ITEM: 2 STAFF CONTACT: Michael Spaeth, Senior Planner mspaeth@orovalleyaz.gov (520) 229-4812 Applicant: Ken Perry, Perry Engineering, Inc. Request: Conceptual Site Plan for 3 lot single-family subdivision on approximately 0.71 acres. Location: North of Desert Sky Road approximately ¼-mile west of Oracle Road. Recommendation: Approve with the conditions listed in Attachment 1. SUMMARY: The project includes the development of an approximately 0.71 acre property into a 3 lot single-family residential subdivision. The Conceptual Design Review Board review is focused on the fundamental elements of the Conceptual Site Plan, including site layout, drainage/grading and landscape content. The applicant’s proposal includes:  Three single-family residential lots with a maximum building height of 28 feet or 2 stories.  Sidewalks providing additional pedestrian connectivity.  Substantial preservation of existing native plants to be transplanted on site” and incorporated into the final landscape plan.  Fifteen (15’) foot Buffer yard Type “A” along the Desert Sky Road frontage.  Several drainage basins for rainwater collection. The Conceptual Site Plan has been evaluated for conformance with the Design Principles and Design Standards. The Design Principles are utilized as the primary guidance for evaluation of Conceptual Site Plans. The Design Standards, found in Addendum “A” of the Zoning Code, are used as secondary evaluation criteria. The applicant’s proposal, with conditions listed in Attachment 1, is consistent with the Design Principles and Design Standards. The proposed Conceptual Site Plan is provided as Attachment 2 and the Conceptual Landscape Plan is provided as Attachment 3. OV1214-27 Desert Sky 3-lot Subdivision Page 2 of 8 Conceptual Design Review Board Staff Report BACKGROUND/DETAILED INFORMATION: The Existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning for the property and the surrounding area is summarized below and depicted in Attachments 4 and 5. Land Use and Zoning EXISTING LAND USE GENERAL PLAN ZONING SUBJECT PROPERTY Vacant High Density Residential (5+ du/ac) Townhouse Residential (R-4) NORTH Horizon Heights Condominiums High Density Residential (5+ du/ac) Townhouse Residential (R-4 SOUTH Sunstone Estates High Density Residential (5+ du/ac) Medium lot Single-Family Residential (R1-7) EAST Desert Sky Subdivision High Density Residential (5+ du/ac) Townhouse Residential (R-4 WEST Vacant Low Density Residential 1 (0.4 – 1.2 du/ac) Large lot Single-family Residential (R1-43) Approvals to Date  April 1974: Subject property annexed as part of the original Town Incorporated Area.  1980: Subject property translational zoning to R-4 Site Conditions  Site is approximately 0.71 acres  Property is vacant Proposed Conceptual Site Plan The applicant’s request, included as Attachments 2 and 3, is summarized as follows:  Three single-family residential lots  Maximum building height of 28 feet or two stories.  Fifteen (15’) foot Buffer yard Type “A” along Desert Sky Road. OV1214-27 Desert Sky 3-lot Subdivision Page 3 of 8 Conceptual Design Review Board Staff Report  Substantial preservation of existing native plants to be transplanted on site and incorporated into the final landscape plan.  Sidewalks within the development connecting to those being provided a long Desert Sky Road, providing additional pedestrian connectivity.  Several drainage basins for rainwater collection. Recreational Area The applicant has requested to utilize the in -lieu fee option enabled by Section 26.5 of the Zoning Code in place of the required recreation area facilities. An in-lieu fee agreement between the applicant and the Town is required and will be considered by Town Council prior to consideration of the applicant’s CSP. The in-lieu fee will be required to be used for a specific park development or the improvement of an existing park facility. At this time the specific project/improvement has not been identified. DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS: Conceptual Site Design Principles, Section 22.9.D.5.a Analysis The Conceptual Site Plan is in general conformance with all applicable Conceptual Site Design Principles. Following are key Design Principles (in italics), followed by staff evaluation of how the design addresses the principles: Building orientation: the location, orientation and size of structures shall promote a complementary relationship of structures to one another. Staff Commentary: The subject property is adjacent to single-story homes to the north and east. The proposed homes are permitted up to a maximum building height of 28 feet or 2 stories. The Design Guidelines restrict homes located on corner lots to single story, therefore restricting the home on lot 1 to be a single story. Furthermore, the Design Guidelines restrict two story homes to no more than 60% of the lots within a development. A subdivision with three lots would be permitted one lot as a two story per the Design Guidelines. At this time the applicant does not know whether any of the lots will be developed two-story homes. Lots 1 and 2 will be located immediately adjacent to Desert Sky Road to the south and an existing common area in the Desert Sky subdivision to the east. Drainage/grading: site grading shall minimize impacts on natural grade and landforms and provide for subtle transitions of architectural elements to grade. Significant cuts and fills in relation to natural grade shall be avoided or minimized to the extent practical given property constraints. Staff Commentary: The applicant’s proposal has considered the impacts of drainage and grading. The subject property is substantially flat with minimal slope characteristics. However, numerous concerns were raised during the neighborhood meetings concerning drainage in the area. Development of this parcel will increase runoff due to the addition of non-permeable surfaces associated with residential structures and subdivision streets. The applicant will be OV1214-27 Desert Sky 3-lot Subdivision Page 4 of 8 Conceptual Design Review Board Staff Report required to provide a full drainage report during Final Design review submittal to ensure conformance with the Town’s Drainage Manual. All post-development flow shall be mitigated and released in the same manner and quantity as the pre-development flow. Additionally, the Conceptual Site Plan incorporates several drainage basins to be utilized as Rainwater Harvesting to help mitigate increased runoff. Connectivity: strengthen the usability and connectivity of the pedestrian environment internally and externally by enhancing access to the public street system, transit, adjoining development and pedestrian and bicycle transportation routes. Buildings and uses should provide access to adjacent open space and recreational areas where appropriate. Staff Commentary: The proposed subdivision will be accessed off Desert Sky Road. The applicant’s proposal incorporates sidewalks, both internally and externally along Desert Sky Road. The external sidewalks will connect to the existing sidewalks along the Desert Sky subdivision frontage to the east, improving pedestrian connectivity throughout the area, including to Egelston Road which provides close access to James D. Kriegh park. The Town of Oro Valley standard for street-intersection separation is a minimum of 150’ from centerline-to-centerline. The location of the shared private driveway on the subject property will create a street-intersection separation condition for the adjacent parcel that is not in conformance with the Zoning Code. Any access to the adjacent parcel will be less than 150’ from the proposed shared driveway. A condition of approval has been added to Attachment 1 requiring the applicant to either provide a cross-access easement for potential future access to the undeveloped property to the west, thereby eliminating the need for direct access onto Desert Sky Road for that parcel; or revise the shared private driveway location to allow a minimum 150’ centerline-to-centerline separation for a future street access to the adjacent parcel to the west. Addendum “A” Design Standards Provide open space at project entries (Section 3.1.A.1.c) Staff Commentary: The Conceptual Site Plan conforms to this standard. The required buffer yard along Desert Sky Road will provide open space at the subdivision entrance. Additionally, the rainwater harvesting basin, located immediately north of the required buffer yard, will provide additional open space along the project entry. Street trees…shall be used to provide individual street character (Section 3.1.B.2) Staff Commentary: The Conceptual Site Plan is consistent with this Design Standard. The proposed subdivision incorporates trees in the front yards of the proposed homes as well as along the western edge of the property (see Attachment 3). By providing street trees along both sides of the private driveway the applicant’s proposal establishes individual street character for the proposed subdivision. OV1214-27 Desert Sky 3-lot Subdivision Page 5 of 8 Conceptual Design Review Board Staff Report Pedestrian and vehicular connections shall be provided between neighborhoods (Section 3.1.D.4) Staff Commentary: The Conceptual Site Plan conforms to this standard. The applicant’s proposal includes the provision of sidewalks, both internally and externally. The s idewalks proposed along Desert Sky Road will connect with the existing sidewalks to the east and provide future connections to the vacant properties to the west. Engineering DRAINAGE Existing stormwater runoff flows over the surface of the subject property in a mostly southerly direction. The proposed development shall be designed to meet the requirements of the Town’s Drainage Criteria Manual and Floodplain Ordinance. The applicant proposes to construct drainage improvements consisting of drainage swales and rainwater harvesting basins. The proposed swales will direct runoff to the basins which will serve the dual purpose of providing rainwater harvesting opportunities while offsetting the increase of runoff resulting from the construction of impermeable surfaces. Under post-developed conditions, flow shall be mitigated to discharge to the south in the same or reduced intensity, manner and location as in the existing form. GRADING The project is a custom-graded residential subdivision. A Type 2 Grading Perm it is required to construct the street, drainage facilities, and utilities. Individual Type 1 Grading Permits shall be required for the construction of each individual residential lot. All grading shall adhere to chapter 27.9 of the Town of Oro Valley Zoning Code. TRAFFIC The proposed development will have a single point of access that connects to Desert Sky Road. The proposed design is acceptable to the Golder Ranch Fire District and the Town Engineer’s office. Traffic generated from the proposed developme nt will be minimal and will have no noticeable impact to the surrounding roadway network. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Summary of Public Notice Notice to the public was provided consistent with Town-adopted noticing procedures, which includes the following:  Letter to all property owners within 600 feet  Letter to all individuals that attended the neighborhood meeting.  Posting at Town Hall OV1214-27 Desert Sky 3-lot Subdivision Page 6 of 8 Conceptual Design Review Board Staff Report  All registered HOAs Neighborhood Meetings Two neighborhood meetings were held concerning the applicant’s proposal. The first meeting on July 9, 2014 had approximately 13 residents and interested parties in attendance while the second meeting on November 12, 2014 had approximately 18 residents and interested parties in attendance. The two meetings included the following primary discussion topics:  Compatibility with neighboring properties  Drainage  Building Height  Noise  Parking A copy of both neighborhood meeting summaries has been included as Attachment 6. Additional comments have been received by Staff and have been included as Attachment 7. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the finding that the Conceptual Site Plan is in conformance with the Oro Valley Design Principles and applicable Design Standards, it is recommended that the Conceptual Design Review Board take the following action: Recommend approval to the Town Council of the requested Conceptual Site Plan OV1214-27, subject to the conditions on Attachment 1. SUGGESTED MOTIONS: I move to recommend approval of the Conceptual Site Plan for the Desert Sky 3-lot subdivision, based on the findings in the staff report. OR I move to recommend denial of the Conceptual Site Plan for the Desert Sky 3-lot subdivision finding that _____________________. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Conditions of Approval 2. Conceptual Site Plan 3. Conceptual Landscape Plan 4. General Plan Land Use Map OV1214-27 Desert Sky 3-lot Subdivision Page 7 of 8 Conceptual Design Review Board Staff Report 5. Zoning Map 6. Neighborhood Meeting Summaries 7. Resident Comments ___________________________________________ Bayer Vella, Interim Planning Manager Attachment 1 Conditions of Approval Conceptual Design Review Board January 13, 2015 Planning Conditions 1. Provide a 3½’ tall decorative screen wall at the north end of the property to ensure vehicle headlights do not shine on adjacent properties to the north. 2. The applicant shall either provide a cross-access easement for potential future access to the undeveloped properties to the west, with future property owners utilizing the cross-access responsible for their fair share of roadway development and maintenance costs , or revise the shared private driveway location to allow a minimum 150’ centerline to centerline separation for a future street access for the parcel immediately west of the subject property. Engineering Conditions 1. Please provide Private Drainage Easements where necessary for lot to lot drainage. MINUTES ORO VALLEY CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW BOARD REGULAR SESSION January 13, 2015 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER Chair Eggerding called the regular session to order at 6:00 PM. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Nathan Basken, Member Sarah Chen, Member Kit Donley, Member Jacob Herrington, Member Harold Linton, Member Bruce Wyckoff, Vice Chairman Richard Eggerding, Chairman ABSENT: None. ALSO PRESENT: Joe Hornat, Council Member Lou Waters, Council Member David Laws, Permitting Manager Chad Daines, Principal Planner Joe Andrews, Chief Civil Deputy Attorney REGULAR AGENDA MOTION: A motion was made by Kit Donley, Member and seconded by Jacob Herrington, Member to approve MOTION carried, 7-0. 2. PUBLIC HEARING: PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN FOR A 3-LOT SUBDIVISION ON APPROXIMATELY 0.71 ACRES, LOCATED ONE -QUARTER (1/4) MILE WEST OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF DESERT SKY ROAD AND ORACLE ROAD, OV1214-27 Staff Report and Conditions of Approval Attachment 2 - Conceptual Site Plan Attachment 3 - Conceptual Landscape Plan Attachment 4 - General Plan Land Use Map Attachment 5 - Zoning Map Attachment 6 - Neighborhood Meeting Summaries Attachment 7 - Resident Comments Michael Spaeth, Senior Planner, presented a staff report which included the following information: Area map Proposal image Location with regards to Desert Sky Rd. Condition images, with alternate options Condition image, with option B, which staff feels is the best option. Neighborhood Meeting/Public Input overview and results Summary & Recommendation Ken Perry, Perry Engineering, was present and responded to questions posed by the board. Mr. Perry provided further explanation regarding the driveway area and the proposed requirements for the property owner. Tom Bailey, property owner, expressed his wishes to continue moving forward with the plan to develop the property. Mr. Bailey feels he should be able to continue forward with the building of his three homes, and the driveway issue should have no impact upon their development plans. MOTION: A motion was made by Harold Linton, Member to approve MOTION: A motion was made by Bruce Wyckoff, Vice Chairman and seconded by Nathan Basken, Member to approve MOTION carried, 7-0. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: A motion was made by Jacob Herrington, Member and seconded by Bruce Wyckoff, Vice Chairman to adjourn MOTION carried, 7-0. ZONING MAP DESERT SKY 3-LOT SUBDIVISION (OV1214-27) Attachment 5 N fS R-4 >-Rl-43 '" E SF:!RING ~ R-4 co ~ if J R-4 ~ Rl-7 a: c z 0 I- '" 0: w -' C q" '" Z W => ~<v z '" ,,0 Z ~'" w CO ~'<; R-4 -' "'~ 0 " <v z of 1 Michael J . Spaeth AICP Senior Planner Development and Infrastructure Services Town of Oro Valley Subject--Recreation Area in-lieu fee: Desert Sky With the assistance and guidance of a couple of appraisers and my own 40 plus years of real estate experience, I present the following as an amount that represents the spirit of your code requirement, ie: the "Recreation in -li eu fee". I have calculated and submit as Exhibits data that was used to arrive at an in-lieu fee of $ 5754 .00 . Exhib it A is a narrative on market conditions in the Northwest area which yields a price per sq . ft . of $4.92 or $50,000 per improved lot. Exhibit B (passive) is representative of a quality bench made of recycled plast ics. Exhibit C (active) reflects "a horseshoe pit" and an est imate to install of $125.00 . I trust that this meets with your satisfaction and that you will contact me with any questions you might have. Respectfully submitted, ~~ Tom Bailey Desert Sky Subdivision (52 0) 909-1495 2/8/20158:53 PM ,f I Exhibit A The price per sq.-ft . calculations: The formula explained to me by David Law and one of your planners is : 85 units per acre @ 3 lots, ie : 43560 sf; divided by 85 = 512.5 sf x 3 units= 1537 sf required for 1 acre. as you know, we have approximately .7 acres in our small (3) lot development , so: 1537 sf x.7 acres = 1076 sf. With a lot value of $50,000 each x 3 lot s = $150,000 improved value. $150 ,000 divided .7 acres = $ 4 .92 I sf. The land area @1076 sf x $4.92 = $5294.00 land value $5294.00 land value 26 0.00 "passive" bench, Ex B 200.00 "active" horseshoe pit , Ex C $5754.00 in -lieu fee 2/8/20 158:51 PM Northwest Sub market The subject property is located in the northwest area of metropolitan Tucson, w ithin Tucson MLS submarket "Northwest ". The following chart summarizes and compares market information for the detached single-family residential sector between the Tucson Metropolitan Area and the subject's submarket. The Northwest district is very large, and captures about 25% to 30% of market-wide activity. The subject area is weathering price increases very well, as closings are keeping pace with the prior year, with a slight decline in 2014, consistent with the overall market. The Northwest district is geographical ly very large and includes a diversity of types, including portions of Oro Valley, Marana and unincorporated Pima County. Near the southern end of the district, the supply is o ld er and established. Around the Tortolita Mountains, there is considerable f loodplain land that will remain vacant or very low density for the foreseeable future . In the northeast portion are rural Catalina and Saddlebrooke, a retirement community. In the middle of the district are Dove Mountain and Stone Canyon , lUxury projects . The average price is $)55,553 , up nearly 20% from the 2011 trough. Sales activity is steady and prices are gradually rising . There are currently 1,686 home s listed for sale in the northwest submarket, including 162 new-construction homes. At the sales rate demonstrated over 2014 , the current inventory equates to about a 6.4 month supply. 1 , .... , oOo,t..,r" / ,\... !, '" i' ;~ Tonono O'Odh~m Nat ion J./1":;_~, J c,"tl" " , I .. , .L I'i ..... ; ''' ..... 1,. .... ' " \ I V , , '.- ., _. ...... ...... \\ .j I I " I , r~-" .~ ", J , ; , '" 2 1 ® " ." ..... (X~E) • '·,1 "@ SogU\lfO f , • ~-NJrtOfldI '\('.:'" ~ Park E.,I , .. ,,~,,:1 @ \ , .. ''\' " .. :~ , "' .I c.;oron.."<IO ' :-~/ ,.,.row \ , Residential Lot Supply The single family land market is analyzed as wel l. 2014 has experienced a decrease in overall residential land transaction activity. However, pricing is rising and despite a 50% reduction in transactions, the overall value of the transactions only decreased by 25 %. The market is running low on finished lot inventory and many of the finished lots which remain for sale have some functionality issues. The number of finished lot transactions through the first three quarters of the year have decreased from 15 in 2013 to only 2 in 2014 . With a scarce finished lot availabi li ty, builders are seeking out raw and platted land. These transactions have increased over 50% from the first three quarters of 2013 vs 2014. Many of these transactions have occurred in the subject's Northwest submarket with 5 in 2013 and an additional 7 in 2014. According to Aaron Mendenhal of Chapman Lindsey, demand is high in the Northwest area for two reasons: First , there had been pent up demand for move-up buyers in this area. Secondly, the higher prices of homes help support lot development costs. Development costs have increased since the downturn of the market and entry level home pricing is insufficient to offset the fairly static lot development costs . Subject Neighborhood Supply and demand for the immediate subject neighborhood is analyzed. The subject is located in Oro Valley, which is an affluent area with a large variety of product. Pricing trend are difficult to decipher due to the limited individual lot sa les transacted with in th is neighborhood on an annual basis. Furthermore, many of the sales occurred in ex isting neighborhoods with above average amenities such as golf courses, gated entrances , and clubhouses. Based on the MLS search , then entire Oro Valley area has generally reported between 0 and 3 lot transactions in 6 of the past 7 years in the size range of 5,000 S.F. to 20,000 S.F. The majority of activity for individual custom lots occurs in the 1+ acre range. Sma ll er lots are genera ll y purchased in bulk by bui ld ers and so ld as improved. 3 An MLS search w as also perform ed for ne wly co nstructed single famil y home sale s (built in 2008 +) occurr ing in Oro Valley over 2014 and on lots of 5,000 S.F . to 20,000 S.F . The re su lts indi cate a price range from $2 31 ,000 t o $67 5,000 with a median price of $303 ,36 2. Active brokers and developers ind icate a sale price to finished lot r atio of 18 % to 20% is required for feasibility. Ba sed on improved sales in the area, finished lot pricing should range in the $45 ,000 to $135 ,000 range with a median of $60 ,000 . " fIGmb Web • Intenw.t EJcpIorer flexml s.c om Price A naly sis SummDry o f Closed Listings ""'. Add_ U .. Price DOH <DOH ... d .... Sold Price 2141.4121 12820 N WutJn;nr..r Ori" .. , On:> V.Jlr,r AI. $l38.J,u " ... t UlO!2et" $231 .344 21323124 13289 N e.rlasi .... OriY<l. On:> Valley AZ 5246.5&1 '" 2 52 D2/:!.1/201.t:. '232.000 21223123 13335 tl aartusin. Dnvw . Qr., Va U.y AZ. 524 5,744 145 2 5 3 0 1/29/20 1"-5 234.000 2 14 0 8004 10711 W ~l.""," 0riY •. On> V.!1ey AZ 5 236.174 l20 '" 07/29/20 1'" $234.15"7 21 4 2.26 51 3 12901 t~ l~n I>.hns Drive . 0.., V"JI'-Y lIoZ $255.255 " " 09[JO/20}<: SZ~.'l' 214010010 12850 PI Camlno V'-';" ""nct.rilI. 010 V,,11<ty AZ 5254.990 ., ., 0 2/26/2014 '24 51 .000 21401044 12939 PI earn:no V.r,. Rooru:h.riIo. Oro V.'ley AZ $259.990 " " Ol/2S/Z01'" '251.390 Zl"'Zl6B'l' 128B9 PI IndLan ".Im$ D~ 0 1'0 v .e.y AZ. 5 272.489 !26 ". 1 2123/201 00 $261.0 13 H4l4980 1086 W Gam.n G"" .... 0 ""' .. Oro Va lle y A.Z 5323.045 m '" 10/~/201c s281.879 21~O I 'J95 12979 E Camino V"J.Ii Ranct.. .... Oriv. rl. Oro Va H.y "l S297.!90 ". ,.. 0 2/27/2014 $2B2.990 21 C0037 1 12897 tl Ind"''' "alrT3 On-.. Oro v .1l.y .lIZ S 308,':?B !33 !3l 06/2~201 " s290 .~7 214(1 117 5 12~7 r~ Camino v..;a Ranu..ri ., 0 .... v .u.y AZ 5320.690 ~ ~ 0 2/2 6/201 4 5294.000 2142"04 12907 N Ind",,, :>.lms Om ... 0 .... V.!!.y .lIZ nOJ .698 " " 1 2/09/201 4 5 2~,69B :!:I<1UA56 llJ;J W 'i"'lIor PIle •• Oro V.n.y AZ 5 3 38,189 ~ M 1 110<1120 14 5J02.724 2 !~:!:8449 11441 N a. ........ l ... Oriv,. Oro ".llIv .t.Z 5324,9(10 1;).4 '" 03/2.7/2014 S304.OOO 21401172 12969 fj Shell Trad,,.. Court. Om V.II,y A.Z 5299.990 •• " 04/2 5/2014 n05,000 21<1 11 559 566 E Chann.] Vi..-, PI ,e •• Oro V,~.y AZ $3204 .900 " " 06/16/20 1"" 5315,000 21424 135 12919 11 Inti", .. ".Ims Oriv,. 0 .... Vallay liZ 5325.475 " " 1 1/26/20 1"" 5 319.4 9 7 214 1 545' 1 291!10 tl Camlnt> V"JiI Rancn.n il . 0 .... Vil llily A2. 5389.900 ,. ,. OB /O:l/20!4 53B5.000 21425739 12994 N C'''''ftO ViIlJ' Rancn.ti •• O ro V.IIIY A2. 5436.000 " " 1 2/3 0/2014 5417.500 21425 823 1 2925 N Viii V .. bI o.l ~ .. do, Oro V.ll ly AZ 5429,000 " " 11/25/2014 5-420 .000 2 1422202 12949 Il Vi. V .. bI 0.1 .. , .. do , O ro Vililly AZ 5449,!JQO " .. 1 2/0312014 5-426,500 :141231 8 1047'3 N El::<a br.:h Noming ~e, N, 0"" V,lll y A.Z 541 5 ,4 ]0 , , 09/0312014 $44 8 .9 14 21407607 4 60 E s ... k"" carr.r W.y . Oro V,II I Y ,",Z $469,000 " " 0 5/01/201 4 5450.000 :!:141762 9 1 3100 t/ Art;fllCt Canyon ta"" 01'0 v,III Y t.;z. $479,900 " 2:! 0812612014 5465.000 2:1424787 10 7B9 rl Ol!la Viti PI.e .. 0,.., V.llIy .llZ 5634.424 " " 01128/201 5 5622.000 2 140034-4 11098 rJ Joy fa;th 0 ..... , Oro V.nl Y .o..z U65 ,OOO " " 07/Z!!l201<1. $64'.400 :!!33:!044 1 114S N Joy fa;th 0 ..... , On> V.II.y .o..z $698,000 ,. ,. 02/:!:712014 $675.000 Low. Ave r age. M e d i an, a nd Hig h Co m p arison s ... '-...... - ..... 00 "" o..-illi • ,. ,. -""' ........ ..... Sold .... lO.l41 .OJ 16 362.281 9.900.919 10,1 4 1 ,9Ui 3620:283 9 ,900,9 1 0 ....... $:!J!,344 53'!,],604 $Ji)3.36 2 5575.000 Overall Ma r ke t A n a l y s is (Un adjust e d ) .... -.... .... , ..... .... .--...... ......... ..... ..... SqA S/c-nbin.d SqR 353.604 0.97 ,,., 0 9.83 --0.07 ~,., .,..., 4 Tot.! Adjust..-b .... SoId S/~SqA 136.46 .,.. .. = I!t AdjuRed Price . ... 0- " "" 5 231.)44 5232 .000 5 234 .000 5 234 .157 5 246,51' 5243.000 5251 .390 '267.013 52!11 .879 $282 .9 90 $2;JO .397 $2514 ,000 52~.698 5 302 ,724 5304,000 $305 ,000 5 315,1)00 na.497 539 5 .000 541 7.500 5 420.000 5436,500 $44S,914 $"~O.OOO $"65,000 562Z,0 0 0 5&':'.':00 5675.0 00 """'"" $2:31 ,l""~ $3'3.6 0 4 $30 3 .362 5675,000 . ... <DOOO " .. CLIENT DETAIL REPORT iMLlnic:ip"li\)'/Z,mir,g: Oro Valley -PAD ~ .• ",J"T~.: ••. 201 2/1,116 Fee Ami P/Monlh: 35 Frequency: Quarterl y District: Amphitheater Ele:m,mtarv School : Wilson K-8 Sclno"I: Wil so n K-8 Tu cson , TRS: 12 /13 /10 Lol Acres: 0.17 lot Dimensions: 75x9 9x71 x1 00 Lol SF/Source : 7,405 / Assess or Tax Code: 22 4-2 4-D50 0 Assessments: 0.00 Fire Prot Incl Taxes: Ye s Master Plan Name: unknown Pima County GIS I Pima County Ass essor N on La Can ada to Canad a Hills Drive , West to Bro adston e, North to addr ess. i to Sewer: lot line to Water: lot lin e to Electric : lot lin e to Gas: non e Lot 13 IU1tiliities Lot Line: El ec tric; Sewer; Tel ep hon e; Wate r ; Oth er Fence: Mas onry Stu cco Gas:SWG Water: Oro Va lley Documents : Sewer: Sewer Availabl e Environmental Disci : Un known Topography : Fl al Deed Restrictions : Ves Dividable Lot: No Gated Community: No Hillside Dev Zone: No Horses Allowed: No Legal Access: Ves Lgi/Phys Access Same : Ve s Mobile Home Allowed: No Course: Ye s Package Avai lable: No Paved Street : Yes Physical Access : Yes Rel e ase Available : No Oth er Scenic Rle/Galeway: No Sewer Capacity Avlbl : Ve s Slaked/Flagged : No Subdivided Lois : V es Consid : No Available: No Water Available: Ves I I ~~~~~~~to be reliab le bbul lS not guarant ee d.@ 2015 ML Sand FB S.Prepared by MichaeI J.Naifeh on Frlda;,y;1, Feb'""iVii6:;'01!51ci:56MlliiiOinro;:;;;auo;;~'. mad e ava il able y the MLS-and may not be th e listin g of the provi der. CLIENT DETAIL REPORT ~~,~~~~~~i;~:';<>nilng: Oro Valley -PAD Lot Acres: 0.18 Lot Dimensions: 20 x 195 x 42 x 160 x 59 Lot SF/Source: 7,841 1 Surveyor Tax Code: 220-13-{)710 Assessments: 0.00 Fire Prot Incl Taxes: No Master Plan Name: None Pima County GIS I Pima County Assessor , E on EI Conquistador Way, follow through golf course to Ridge Shadows Dr , con tinu e to lot between homes at 9809 to Phone: i to Sewer : Avail to Water: Avail to Electric : Avail to Gas: NA 1~~:~~:~~~~:L;~O:~t ~L:I~ne: Other Electric: Tucson Fence: Non e Gas: None View: City; Sunset Well : None Water: Oro Valley Sewer: Sewer Available Topography: Flat Loan Information: Documents: Environmental Disci: Unknown Deed Restrictions: Ves Dividable Lot: No Gated Community: No Hillside Dev Zone : No Horses Allowed: No Legal Access: Ves LgllPhys Access Same: Ves Mobile Home Allowed: No Package Available: Ves Paved Streel: Ves Physical Access : Ves Release Available: No Scenic Rle/Gateway: No Sewer Capacity Avlbl: Ves Staked/Flagged: No Subdivided Lots: Ves Magnificent view lot sitting high above the fabulous Hilton EI Conquistador Resort! i i .R!e«,rt private club. Those amenities extend to renters also! Bac kya rd privacy with beautiful Catalina Mountain Views, and front views all the way Sombrero Pea k and Th e Tucson Mountains. The Oro Valley ligh ts will sparkle at night! See dramatic sunsets from your home . Walk to National Forest and Graded lot for new home. A must see!!! Payment: Sold Price Sqft: ~'ell," Pd Fin Costs: Sold Dale: 04/25/2014 Sold PrclAcre: List Price Valbri,dge Property Advisors Michael J. Naifeh 6061 E Grant Rd, Ste 121 Tucson , AZ 85712 Sold Price : 63,000 Seiling Comments: Lot Sz Price/Acre: 41 ~:<E'!?~!i~S deemed to be reliable, but is not.guaranteed.@2015MlSand FBS.PreparedbyMichael J. Naifeh on Friday, Feb,ruarv C;s.:Wi'5i(l'5€iMUhelhlormafu;;o;;'1 been made available by the MLS and may not be th e listing of th e provider. i to Sewer: Avail to Water: Avail to Electric: Avail to Gas: Avail 1~:~~:~~~:~a~L,~o~t ~L,~i~ne: Other CLIENT DETAIL REPORT Municipality/Zonin,g: Oro Valley -PAD Lot Acres: 0.16 Frequency: Monthly ~~~~:~~:D!:i~strict: Amphitheater Ie School : Wi lson K-8 Sclhoc.l: Wilson K-8 Fence: Wrought Iron Gas: SWG View: City ; Mountain ; Sunset Lot Dimensions: 71 x 100 x 71 x 98 Lot SF/Source: 7,077/ Assessor Tax Code: 224-24-0470 Assessments: 0.00 Fire Prot Inc I Taxes: Yes Master Plan Name: PAD Pima County GIS I Pima County Assessor Water: Oro Valley Sewer: Sewer Available Topography: Ftat i : Documents: Environmental Disci: Other Available: Yes Deed Restrictions: Ves Dividable Lot : No Gated Community: No Hillside Dev Zone: No .Ho,".e Facilities: No Horses Allowed: No Legal Access: Ves LgllPhys Access Same: Ves Mobile Home Allowed: No Course: Yes Package Available: Yes Paved Street : Yes Physical Access: Yes Release Available: No Malint:enan'ce: Other Scenic Rte/Gateway: No Sewer Capacity Avlbl: Ves Staked/Flagged: No Subdivided Lots: Ves Consid: No Available: No Water Available: Ves i Of: Long Realty Company Val bridge Property Advisors Michael J. Naifeh 6061 E Grant Rd, Ste 121 Tucson , r.;z 85712 i on CLIENT DETAIL REPORT ~~=...,.,,,, .. it~~'Fr-~-1~~I~~~;~!i~:;~).n~'~~: Oro Valley -PAD IV"."T .. ,..· 2012 11 .797.76 Fee Amt PIMonth: 26 Frequency: Quarterly TRS: 12 1 14 1 6 Lot Acres: 0 .17 Lot Dimensions: Irregular Lot SFISource : 7,405 I Assessor Tax Code: 220-05-7920 Assessments: 0.00 ". to Sewer: Lot Line ~~~~:~~:D!ii,~strict: Amphitheater Ie School: Painted Sky Coronado K-8 Fire Prot Incl Taxes: Yes Master Plan Name: None Pim a County GIS I Pima County Assessor Rd -E. Cassiopeia Dr -N. Moonshroud Dr -E to property. Estates 04 Fence: None Water: Oro Valley Documents: to Water: Lot Line to Electric: Lot Line to Gas: Lot Line Gas:SWG Sewer: Sewer Available Environmental Disci: Unknown Topography: Flat IUtilil:ies Lot Line: Electric ; Gas ; Sewer; Te lephone ; Water Deed Restrictions: Yes Dividable Lot: No Gated Community: No Hillside Dev Zone: No Horses Allowed: No legal Access: Yes LglIPhys Access Same: Yes Mobile Home Allowed: No Course : No Package Available: No Paved Street: Yes Physica l Access: Yes Release Available: No M"int:enan,ce: Oth er Scenic RtelGateway: No Avlbl: Ves StakedlFlagged: No Subdivided Lots: Ves No Available: No 0312!l120 13 .18 on CLIENT DETAIL REPORT ~---------1Mulniciipallity,rZoning: Oro Va ll ey -PAD 2010 /1,375 Fee Amt P/Month: 30 Frequency : Monthly 1~~~::~!D~:i~strict: Amphithe ater 10 Lot Acres: 0.19 Lot Dimensions : 71 x 116 Lot SF/Source: 8 ,320/ Assessor Tax Code: 224 -24-0 590 Assessments : 0 .00 Fire Prot Inc I Taxes: Yes Master Plan Name: Other School: Wilson K-8 Wilson K-8 Pima County GIS I Pima County Assessor 161 N Broad stone Dri ve Valle y, AZ 85737 LA CANADA! LAMBERT N. TO CANADA HIL LS , W. TO BROADSTONE , N. TO ADDRESS /LOT ON LEFT. FA IRWAY VI LLAGE LOT 22 AVAIL Electric: Tu cson Ele ctric Well : None Fence: None Water: Oro Valley Documents: to Sewer: AVA IL to Water: AVA IL to Etectric : AVAIL to Gas : AVAI L Gas : SWG Sewer: Sewer Ava ila ble Environmental Disci : Unknown Topography: Flat 1~~~~:~~;~:L~:O~:t~:L;:i~ne: E lect ric; Gas; Sewer; Telephone ; Water Oeed Restrictions : Yes Dividable Lot: No Gated Community: No Hillside Dev Zone : No Facilities: No Horses Allowed: No Legal Access : Yes LgllPhys Access Same: Yes Mobile Home Allowed: No Course: No Package Available : Yes Paved Street: Yes Physical Access : Yes Release Available: No : Other Scenic Rte/Gateway: No Sewer Capacity Avlbl: Yes Staked/Flagged: No Subdivided Lots : Yes Consid : No Available: No Water AVailable: Yes I Provided Courtesy Of: Long Realty Company Valbridge Property Advisors Michael J. Naifeh 6061 E Grant Rd , Ste 121 Tucson , AZ 85712 List Price 105.26 f~~::~~~~:::~~~~~~~~n~~~~~~and FBS . Prepared by Michael J. Naifeh on Fri day, Feb rua"ryyOEl:-, 2Qi;s,(§6iiiM-:-'iileTnfc;m;a;;ono;onl may Ii i of the provider. CLIENT DETAIL REPORT MLS#: 21105708 Land -Lot / Residential Status: Closed Sotd Price : 15 ,000 List Price: 17 ,995 IArea: Northwest TRS: 11 1 14 /9 Municipali ty/Zoning: Pima County -CR3 Lot Acres : 0.24 ~ounty: Pima Lot Dimensions: 15x7 4 x139x117x93 ~earfTaxes : 2010 /806.55 Lot SF/Source: 10 ,3 60 / Assessor ~ ...... -'0.. ..ft.. .It.. -iH OA Fee Amt P/Month: 0 Tax Code : 222-23-151 F OA Frequency : Assessments: 0.00 "~ -L ' -.; ~chool District: Amphitheater Fire Prot Inc l Taxes: Yes 1'-> Elementary School: Coronado K-8 Master Plan Name: NA Middle School: Coro nad o K-8 Pima Counly GIS 1 Pima County Assessor High School: Ironwood Ridge 'ID!3 erms: Cash ; Conventional I""'" '.'; ...... ubdivision: Twin Lakes (1-148) Comm u nity: No ne Cross Block: 3800 -E Address : 15715 N Starboard Drive Tucson, AZ. 85739 Directions : T a ngerine/Oracle, North to Hawser, Ea st to Twi n Lakes , North to Starboard Or, Ea st o n Starboard Dr to property on north side of street. Legal Description: Twin La kes Lot 146 P lat 17 Pa qe 70 Distance to Phone: Lot Line Electric: Tu cso n Electric Well: None Loa n Information : Distance to Sewer: Street Fence: None Water: Lago Del Oro Documents: Distance to Water: Lot Line Gas:SWG Sewer: Sewer Available Environmental Disci: Unknown Distance to Electric: Lot Une Topography: Flat Distance to Gas: Street Utilities Lot Line : Electric; Te lephone ; Water; Other Miscellaneous: Cable A vaila ble : Yes Deed Restrictions : Yes Lega l Access : Yes Lgi/Phys Access Same: Yes Paved Street: Yes Physical Access: Yes Road Maintenance: Agreement Sewer Capacity Avlbl: Yes Staked/Flagged: Yes Subdivided L ots: Yes Survey Available: Yes Water Available : Yes [Terms: Cash; Conventional I~oan Information: ~old Info: Financial Status: Remarks: Ready to build on w ith a ll util ities at lot line or street. Great pricing on build lot in Catalina perlect for custo m home or for owner to hold p n to , close to shopping, ideal location in a growin g part of Tucson. Down Payment: Financing: Cash Sold Price Sqft: Sold Price: 15,000 Setter Pd Fin Costs : Setter Pd Repairs : Sold Date: 06/13/2011 Selling Comments: Lot Sz Sold Prc/Acre: 62,500 List Price Sqft: Lot Sz Price/Acre: 74,9 79 .17 Listing Provided Courtesy Of: Tierra Antigua Rea lty, LL C Val bridge P roperty Advisors M ic hael J . Naifeh 6061 E Grant Rd . Ste 121 T ucson , AZ. 85712 Information is deemed to be rel iableb but Is no~uaranteed . © 2015 MlS and FBS . Pr~ared by Michael J. Naifeh on Friday, February 06, 2015 10:56 AM. Th e information on this sheet has been made available y th e ML a nd may not be the listing of the provi er. Recycled Plastic Benches, Rec ycle d Benches in Stock -ULINE http ://www.uline.coOl/BL_8787 /Recycl ed-Plastic-Benches My Account I Conlact Us I Sign In I Cart $0 .00 ULiNE 1-800-295-5510 Search Products Uline Products Quick Order Catalog Special Offers About Us Jobs Home ,. All Products ,. Facilities Maintenance ,. Ou1door Furniture ,. Recycled Plastic Benches 11-.... -RECYCLED PLASTIC BENCHES -Virtually maintenance freel Recommended for -• • • warehouse patios, campgrounds, schools and parks. I • 100% recycled UV protected plastic won'f rol , splinter or crock. Withstands harsh weather. • Natural-looklng wood material never needs I sanding , sealing, pointing or stolnlng. • Durable 2" thick p lanks predrllled for easy assembly. H-2887 • Comfortable and durable. • H-2565 Mounting Hardwore available. = -= :;"""'. r,·, ... r r, .. ::v MODEL SIZE WI. PRICE EACH ADD TO DESCRIPTtON NO. lx W x H .... , 1 3+ CART ~ 6' With Bock 72 x 25)(34" 160 $499 $459 SQecU'i CQ IQ[ till§1 6' WIthout Sack 72x23)(18" 115 259 239 ~Qecify Color DROP SHIPS IN 1 DAY FROM KS UNASSEMBtEO VIA MOTOR FREIGHT lofl 2/2/20 15 3:45 PM Amazon.com: SI Pierre SPO l1 S Eagle Tow'nament Hor seshoe Set, Blue... http://w\Vw.amazon.com/St-Pierre-Sports-Tournament-Hofseshoe/dp ~ 'i \~ \.~ \'t-'-C I Shop by Department Yo...r I'Vnazc'l com Todays Dea's G f1 Caras Se Seun:h Sports & Outdoors He'p Go He llo. Sign in Try Your Account · Prime Cart 'N:sh Ust > Sports & Ouldoo~ Athletic & Outdoor Clothing Exercise & Fitness Qu:door Gear Hunt in g & F!sh i:'1 g Cyc'ing Go '! Fan ShOjJ Tea m Sports ktion Sports Sports & Outdo ors) leisure Sports & Game Ro om> Outdoor Games & Activities) Toss Games I Horseshoes Click to open eltPaoded view <) l~~L >t,l M~1 (~\ ~ l_( ) r L h (;01 - t\o ",At 4 ne w from S7t..95 rts Eagle Tournament It, Blue his Item • FREE ShIpping. Details :k (more on the way), y Amazon .com . ).101 Order wittin 22 hrs B mlns and aping at ctJeckollI. Details :he USA ilfger 1" rouod Ilooks afe designed 10 Itake and slay on ;. more weight in the t ips for greater alanca and accuracy; More :hrows means mofe ringers r Tournament play :k.Ibs and serious players i s ". 7{ ~ SO (\cflu l ~'1 . l t l Share Qly: Yes, I want FREE Two -Day Shipping with Amazon Prim e Add to Cart Turn on I-ClICk orderlll9 Add 10 Wi5h List ./--::;;J>ll!!~~ellors on Amazon $14,5 lppiog Sold by; Game Room GU'jS 57499 + Free Sh ipp:ng Stf d by: Vi'aV,a "r S9661 eJ , Add to cart Add bC8rt Attachment 7 Neighborhood Meeting Summaries Town Council March 18, 2015 Neighborhood Meeting Summary Desert Sky Subdivision July 9, 2014 6:00 – 7:30 PM Golder Ranch Fire Station 1. Introductions and Welcome Meeting Facilitator Michael Spaeth, Senior Planner, introduced the Oro Valley staff Paul Keesler, DIS Director. Approximately 13 residents and interested parties attended the meeting. 2. Staff Presentation Michael Spaeth, Project Manager, provided a presentation that included:  Conceptual Site Plan Review Process  Review Tools  Public Participation Opportunities  Next Steps 3. Applicant Presentation Ken Perry, Principal at Perry Engineering, provided a presentation that included:  Proposed Conceptual Site Plan 4. Public Questions & Comments Process & Project Timeline  How long will the project take? Development  What is the proposed size of the homes?  Who owns the adjacent vacant parcels?  Several residents voiced concern about the potential development of two - story homes.  The adjacent Desert Sky subdivision was limited to one-story homes. Why would this development not also be limited to one -story homes?  Drainage has been an issue in the past. How will the Town alleviate new drainage issues? Traffic  The proposal doesn’t seem to provide adequate parking for guests. 5. Next Steps  The next steps include:  Formal application  Staff review  Conceptual Design Review Board Public Hearing  Town Council Public Hearing Meeting dates will be posted on the Town website (www.orovalleyaz.gov) and notices will be mailed to residents within the notification area and all individuals who signed the sign-in sheet at the meeting. For more information, please contact Michael Spaeth, AICP, Senior Planner, at (520) 229-4812 or mspaeth@orovalleyaz.gov Neighborhood Meeting Summary Desert Sky Road 3-lot subdivision Proposed Subdivision (Conceptual Site Plan) November 12, 2014 6:00 – 7:30 PM Town of Oro Valley Council Chambers, 11000 N La Canada Drive 1. Introductions and Welcome Meeting Facilitator Chad Daines, Principal Planner, introduced the Oro Valley staff Michael Spaeth, Senior Planner, as project manager. Approximately 18 residents and interested parties attended the meeting. 2. Staff Presentation Michael Spaeth, Senior Planner, provided a presentation that included:  Summary of the July 9th neighborhood meeting  Applicant’s request  Drainage requirement  Traffic requirements  History of property and surrounding properties  Review tools  Review process  Public participation opportunities 3. Applicant Presentation Tom Bailey, property owner, provided a presentation detailing the applicant’s proposal, which included:  Overview of project  Neighborhood compatibility 4. Public Questions & Comments Following is a summary of additional questions and comments:  Several questions were asked relating to drainage for the site and within the greater area, including: o Alleviating current flooding issues in the area o Ensuring the retention/detention basins are sufficient o Required piping be sufficient  The anticipated value of the homes  Town requirements for landscape conservation  Plans for the vacant property to the west  Proposed lot sizes and home sizes  Compatibility with other homes in the area not two-story Mr. Bailey addressed some of the questions related to the proposed development and the associated impacts. Mr. Laws, Town of Oro Valley Permitting Manager, addressed some of the questions related to drainage impacts of the proposed development and invited attendees to further discuss area drainage issues after the meeting. Mr. Daines closed the meeting, thanked everyone for their attendance and encouraged everyone to contact Mr. Spaeth, the project manager, with any additional thoughts, comments or concerns. Attachment 8 Resident Comments Town Council March 18, 2015 From: henrylicorice@aol.com [mailto:henrylicorice@aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 7:07 PM To: Spaeth, Michael Subject: reg. meeting at fire station - 3-lot subdivision Forgot an important input to the discussion about the proposed two-story houses. For the most part, the residents who live in Horizon Heights condos are senior citizens as well as the residents living in the other subdivisions in the area. It is a quiet neighborhood - two-story houses means children. Seniors do not usually buy two-story houses because they don't want to climb stairs. Hope you will add this comment to your list. Thank you. Susan Schmarak From: Heather Grieshaber [mailto:heatherg55@live.com] Sent: Friday, November 07, 2014 2:30 PM To: Spaeth, Michael Subject: Neighborhood meeting regarding 3 lot subdivision on Desert Sky Rd Dear Michael Thanks you for returning my call. I would like to let you know that I do understand that the property in question is rated R4 and that the builder is allowed to have a maximum height of 25 feet. I am however not very happy about the fact that these folks will be able to look into my back garden. The majority of the houses in this area are only one level and it has allowed all the neighbors to enjoy privacy in their back gardens. I would prefer to continue to not have people looking into my garden Many thanks Heather Grieshaber 163 E Silverstone Place Oro Valley, AZ 520 544 3130 Town Council Regular Session Item # 2. Meeting Date:03/18/2015   Requested by: Stacey Lemos Submitted By:Stacey Lemos, Finance Department:Finance Information SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. (R)15-24, APPROVING A ONE-TIME PAYMENT TO THE ARIZONA PUBLIC SAFETY PERSONNEL RETIREMENT SYSTEM (PSPRS) TO ADDRESS THE INCREASING UNFUNDED LIABILITY OF THE PLAN RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Based on the outcome of a legal challenge made against certain reforms to the PSPRS plan, the Elected Officials Retirement Plan (EORP) and the Correction Officers Retirement Plan (CORP) through Senate Bill 1609 (SB 1609) enacted in 2011, the Town must decide how to fund a significant increase in the future unfunded liability of our PSPRS plan starting in FY 2015/16. SB 1609 included, among other things, a change in the Permanent Benefit Increase (PBI) formula for cost of living adjustments provided to beneficiaries of the PSPRS plan. This change in PBI formula was ruled unconstitutional by the Arizona Supreme Court in the case of Fields v. EORP. PBIs were not provided to retirees under the provisions of SB 1609 for three fiscal years (2012, 2013 and 2014) and as a result, employers must now recognize this unpaid liability (debt) beginning with the 2015/16 employer contribution rates. Staff is recommending a one-time, up-front payment to PSPRS in the amount of $300,000 from General Fund contingency reserves this fiscal year to minimize the future potential increases in recurring pension costs associated with this unfunded liability (debt). BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: The Town of Oro Valley provides pension benefits to its sworn public safety personnel through membership in the Public Safety Personnel Retirement System (PSPRS). The annual employee contribution rate is fixed by state law at 11.05% for FY 2014/15, and is set to increase to 11.65% for FY 2015/16. The employer contribution rate varies by plan and is set annually through an actuarial calculation. There are 256 individual employer plans in the PSPRS system, and the employer rates are unique to each individual plan. For Oro Valley, the employer contribution rate for FY 2014/15 is 20.60% of covered payroll. Based on a covered payroll amount of approximately $7 million in FY 2014/15, the Town will contribute slightly over $1.4 million to the plan in the current fiscal year at the 20.60% contribution rate.  For FY 2015/16, employers will be given a choice between two different contribution rates based on the outcome of a legal challenge made against certain reforms to the PSPRS plan from Senate Bill 1609 enacted in 2011. These SB 1609 reforms also applied to the Elected Officials Retirement Plan (EORP) and the Correction Officers Retirement Plan (CORP). SB 1609 included, among other things, a change in the Permanent Benefit Increase (PBI) formula (for cost of living adjustments) by making it less likely for beneficiaries of PSPRS to receive a PBI and by decreasing the amount of any PBI they would receive. This reform provision was challenged, and the Arizona Supreme Court, in Fields v. EORP, ruled that changing the PBI mechanism for retirees was unconstitutional. There were three fiscal years (2012, 2013 and 2014) in which PBIs were not provided to retirees under the provisions of SB 1609. They must now be paid by employers. Recognizing the liability of unpaid PBIs from the Fields decision will begin with the FY 2015/16 employer contribution rates. The PSPRS Board of Trustees voted to allow employers within PSPRS to elect whether to accept the entire rate increase in FY 2015/16 or to gradually move up to the full rate over a three-year period. If Oro Valley chooses to accept the entire rate increase in FY 2015/16 to address this unfunded liability, the employer contribution rate is 25.07%, a 22% increase from the current contribution rate of 20.60%. If Oro Valley chooses to accept the gradual rate increase over a three-year period, the employer contribution rate is 21.50%, a 4% increase from the current contribution rate of 20.60%. The challenge with accepting the higher contribution rate is that it will increase the recurring pension costs in next year's budget by approximately $300,000 at a time when we are seeking to minimize these ongoing costs. At the lower contribution rate, the increase in recurring costs is just under $100,000. Therefore, in a two-pronged approach, staff is recommending a one-time, up-front payment of $300,000 from General Fund contingency reserves to be paid toward this unfunded liability this fiscal year before June 30, 2015, which will allow the Town to accept the lower contribution rate of 21.50% for the 2015/16 fiscal year and minimize the recurring budget impact of paying this debt to the PSPRS system. This methodology is similar to what the Town has done in the past with using its cash reserves that are earning less than 1% to pay down outstanding debt that is being charged a higher interest rate. In this case, the PSPRS system applies an interest rate of 7.85% on the calculation of future unfunded pension liabilities. FISCAL IMPACT: The current estimated year-end General Fund reserve balance is $11.4 million. After deducting the Council-approved allocation of $1.2 million to the new Community Center and Golf Fund authorized at the March 4, 2015 Town Council meeting, and the recommended one-time payment of $300,000 to PSPRS, the revised balance is $9.9 million, which is 31% of adopted expenditures. This one-time payment will allow the Town to accept the lower employer contribution rate for PSPRS next year of 21.50%. In terms of dollars, the total PSPRS employer contribution this fiscal year $1.446 million, and next year would be $1.538 million, a difference of approximately $92,000. SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to approve Resolution No. (R)15-24, approving a one-time payment in the amount of $300,000 to the Public Safety Personnel Retirement System in order to reduce the increased unfunded liability of the plan. or I MOVE... Attachments (R)15-24 PSPRS One-Time Payment RESOLUTION NO. (R)15-24 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING A ONE-TIME PAYMENT TO THE ARIZONA PUBLIC SAFETY PERSONNEL RETIREMENT SYSTEM (PSPRS) TO ADDRESS THE INCREASING UNFUNDED LIABILITY OF THE PLAN WHEREAS, A.R.S. Title 38, Chapter 5, Article 4 and related statutes establish a Public Safety Personnel Retirement System; and WHEREAS,in 2011, Senate Bill 1609 was enacted which changed the Permanent Benefit Increase (PBI) formula for cost of living adjustments provided to beneficiaries of the PSPRS plan; and WHEREAS, in 2014 Senate Bill 1609 was ruled unconstitutional in the case of Fields v. EORP as the PBI’s did not provide to retirees for three fiscal years. Employers must now recognize this unpaid liability beginning with the 2015/16 employer contribution rates; and WHEREAS, the Town wishes to use a one-time, up-front payment to PSPRS in the amount of $300,000 from the General Fund contingency reserves to minimize the future potential increases in recurring pension costs associated with unfunded liability; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the Town to approve a one-time payment to the Arizona Public Safety Personnel Retirement System to address the increasing unfunded liability of the plan. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, that: 1.The one-time payment of $300,000 from the General Fund contingency reserves to the Arizona Public Safety Personnel Retirement System to address the increasing unfunded liability of the plan is hereby authorized and approved. PASSED, AND APPROVED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley Arizona, this 18th day of March, 2015. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Satish I. Hiremath, Mayor ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM: Julie K. Bower, Town Clerk Tobin Sidles, Legal Services Director Date: Date: Town Council Regular Session Item # 3. Meeting Date:03/18/2015   Requested by: Bayer Vella Submitted By:Chad Daines, Development Infrastructure Services Department:Development Infrastructure Services Information SUBJECT: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE DIRECTION REGARDING TOPICS FOR A FUTURE STUDY SESSION ON SENIOR CARE USES RECOMMENDATION: This is a discussion item only. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The purpose of this agenda item is to further define specific zoning topics of concern for discussion at a study session in April, which will enable staff to conduct the necessary research and provide background information on identified topics. Additionally, industry representatives, state regulators and senior care interested parties will be invited to attend the study session and provide comments as appropriate. On January 7, 2014, Town Council held a public hearing on a proposed Zoning Code amendment with regard to senior care uses, which included revisions to definitions, allowable districts and development standards. The January 7 Council Communication and proposed Zoning Code amendment are provided in Attachment 1.  At the conclusion of the public hearing, Town Council continued the item with direction to hold a future study session. Town Council expressed a desire to explore additional building and property development standards that should be addressed as part of the code amendment. BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: The Zoning Code amendment considered by Town Council in January addressed three areas related to senior care as follows:  Resolve differences between the terms and definitions used in the Zoning Code and those used by the State. Determine which zoning districts are appropriate for senior care uses Provided for a recreational area requirement, including amenities for senior care uses. At the conclusion of the Public Hearing, the consensus of Town Council was that the amendment should comprehensively address development, building and amenity standards related to senior care uses. To assist staff in preparing information for the Study Session, direction on specific areas of concern is requested.  Topics raised by Town Council and one resident, Mr. Adler at the January public hearing included: Exterior to Building Customize recreational area and amenities based on facility type Shaded walking paths and sidewalks Topographic challenges to walking Dog parks Covered parking with convenient access to buildings Minimum property size requirements Emergency access Locational requirements  Setbacks  Walls and buffers Conditional versus permitted use Stand alone senior care ordinance Interior to Building Indoor amenity requirements (furniture, etc.)  Enhanced building code and safety requirements Additional requirements beyond state licensing standards Upon garnering further direction, additional research and more detailed information and options will be provided for the Study Session.   FISCAL IMPACT:  N/A SUGGESTED MOTION: This is a discussion item only. Attachments Attachment 1 - January 7th Council Communication and Code Amendment Town Council Regular Session Meeting Date: 01/07/2015 Submitted By: Chad Daines, Development Infrastructure Services Department: Development Infrastructure Services Information SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE NO. (O)15-01, AMENDING VARIOUS SECTIONS OF THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED (OVZCR) RELATED TO SENIOR CARE USES INCLUDING AMENDMENTS TO DEFINITIONS, ALLOWABLE ZONING DISTRICTS AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the proposed amendment. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Town Council initiated this Zoning Code amendment last year to update and clarify definitions, locations and land use standards for senior care uses. Specifically, the amendment was intended to address the following zoning regulations related to senior care uses: • Resolve differences between terms and definition used in the Zoning Code and those used by the State • Update the Zoning Code to reflect federal and state laws, which provides for small in-home senior care uses within all residential neighborhoods • Determine which zoning districts are appropriate • Evaluate appropriate special land use standards as warranted In summary, the proposed amendment (Exhibit A within the attached ordinance) provides for an update to senior care requirements as follows: • Establishes a single definition for “Senior Care Facility” which includes all levels of care • Deletes outdated terms and definitions for senior care uses and adds/amends definitions for consistency with State licensing terms and definitions • Updates the Table of Permitted Uses to provide for senior care uses in appropriate commercial and residential zoning districts • Establishes a requirement for senior care uses to provide recreational area(s) with amenities to serve residents of the facility The proposed code amendment was considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission on December 2nd. At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Commission voted to recommend approval of the amendment as provided in Exhibit A within the attached ordinance. BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: This section of the report is divided into the main areas of the amendment; Definitions, Zoning Districts and Development Standards. Definitions The Town of Oro Valley Zoning Code currently defines various types of senior care uses including independent living, skilled nursing and rehabilitative care. Over time, the terms and definitions used by the State in licensing senior care uses have changed, but the Zoning Code has not been amended to remain current. From a land use standpoint, there is little external difference between the various levels of senior care and therefore a single definition of Senior Care Facility is proposed, which combines all levels of senior care for clarity and simplicity in regulation. The new definition of “Senior Care” incorporates terms consistent with State licensing regulations, including Assisted Living Facility, Hospice In-Patient Facility and Nursing Care Institutions and Independent Living Facilities. The term Community Residence has been amended to the updated term used by the State “Assisted Living Home.” These are small in-home senior care uses typically found in single family homes in residential neighborhoods. The amendment deletes outdated terms for senior care uses and updates references throughout the Zoning Code. Zoning Districts The proposal also involves an amendment to the Table of Permitted Uses as provided in Exhibit A within the attached ordinance. In summary, Senior Care Facility is proposed as a permitted use in R-4 (Townhouse), R-4R (Resort), R-S (Residential Service), R-6 (Multi-family) and C-N (Neighborhood Commercial) based on the similarity with multi-family residential, which is permitted in these zoning districts. Furthermore, the amendment deletes the requirement for a Conditional Use Permit since these zones are intended for this character of development. The table has been amended to allow Assisted Living Homes in all single-family residential zones, consistent with State and Federal law. Development Standards In initiating the amendment, Town Council directed staff to evaluate and recommend additional development standards, if any, which are appropriate for senior care uses. Senior care uses are currently permitted in zoning districts where multi-family development is allowed, which the amendment will continue to allow senior care uses in those same districts based on external similarity between these uses. As such, senior care uses will be similarly regulated as apartments or town homes in terms of open space, landscaping, building heights, setbacks and design standards, which have proven effective in creating compatibility with adjoining single-family areas. In researching best practices, some studies supported enhanced external recreational amenities for senior care uses. The Town currently has a recreational area requirement for single-family developments, which was used as a basis for senior care uses. The existing Recreational Area Code is provided as Attachment 2 and in summary, requires 1 acre of recreational area for every 85 units. The amendment requires active and passive amenities within these areas and allows for credits to be received for indoor amenities. Comments from industry representatives focused on reducing the amount of recreational area for assisted living and nursing care facilities. Comments from one resident focused on providing more recreational area and not permitting credits for indoor amenities. Additional comments were received relative to operational and building aspects of these facilities, which were outside the scope of the amendment. Furthermore, the operational and building aspects are comprehensively regulated by the State, and by the Town and Fire Marshall through the International Building and Fire Codes. General Plan Compliance The Zoning Code Amendment was reviewed for conformance with the Vision, Goals and Policies of the General Plan. The amendment is supported by a number of General Plan policies, as provided in the Planning and Zoning Commission staff report (Attachment 3). Public Participation Public notice has been provided as follows: - All HOAs in the Town were notified of this hearing - In the Territorial newspaper - At Town Hall - On the Town website In addition to the above public notice, the amendment was distributed to industry representatives, senior care developers and interested residents. Comments received on the amendment are addressed in Attachment 3 and included as Attachment 4. Planning and Zoning Commission Review / Action The request was considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission on December 2nd. Comments at the public hearing focused on clarification that the amendment would not restrict a hospital from offering senior care services. The proposed language was modified to provide that clarification. At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Commission voted to recommend approval of the proposed amendment. The draft Commission minutes are provided as Attachment 5. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to adopt Ordinance No. (O)15-01, providing for amendments to the Zoning Code to modernize definitions, modify zoning districts and improve development standards. OR I MOVE to deny Ordinance No. (O)15-01, providing for an amendment to the Zoning Code, based on the finding that ______________________________. C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 6\@BCL@5C166D06\@BCL@5C166D06.doc Town of Oro Valley Attorney’s Office/ca/1024083 EXHIBIT “A” ADD The following NEW Definitions to Chapter 31 SENIOR CARE FACILITY SHALL MEAN A HEALTH CARE FACILITY PROVIDING SINGLE OR MULTIPLE TYPES OF SENIOR CARE, INCLUDING INDEPENDENT LIVING FACILITIES OR FACILITIES DEFINED AND LICENSED BY THE STATE OF ARIZONA AS AN ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY, HOSPICE IN-PATIENT FACILITY, NURSING CARE INSTITUTION OR SIMILARILY LICENSED FACILITIES. ASSISTED LIVING HOME SHALL MEAN A DWELLING UNIT USED AS A PRIMARY RESIDENCE FOR TEN (10) OR FEWER RESIDENTS WHO RECEIVE SUPERVISORY CARE SERVICES, PERSONAL CARE SERVICES OR DIRECTED CARE SERVICES ON A CONTINUAL BASIS. AMEND the following existing definitions in Chapter 31 Additions shown in ALL CAPS, Deletions shown in strikethrough Independent Living Facility Shall mean A SENIOR CARE FACILITY WHICH PROVIDES RESIDENT BEDS OR RESIDENTIAL LIVING UNITS FOR one (1) or more residential buildings containing multiple dwelling units, each of which has sleeping quarters, a full kitchen and bath, and/or sleeping units. Independent living facilities are intended for, and shall be limited to, occupancy by adults who are able to live independently and do not require routine/ongoing assistance with the activities of daily living. An independent living facility must include areas for full-service communal dining and group activities FOR THE C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 6\@BCL@5C166D06\@BCL@5C166D06.doc Town of Oro Valley Attorney’s Office/ca/1024084 RESIDENTS. The project must include common open space for passive recreation, including walkways, benches, and shade structures. Hospital Shall mean a facility for the general and emergency treatment of human ailments with bed care. and shall include sanitarium and clinic, but shall not include convalescent or nursing home. DELETE the following EXISTING DEFINITIONS in Chapter 31 Skilled Nursing Care Facility Shall mean a LONG TERM CARE health care facility which provides skilled nursing and supportive care (excluding substance abuse treatment) on a 24 hour a day basis to inpatients requiring such services for extended periods (see criteria/specific development standards in Section 25.1.W.). Rehabilitative Care Facility Shall mean a health care long term care facility that provides twenty four (24) hour personal care, rehabilitation, and supportive care services, including medical supervision, for inpatients. Skilled nursing care and ongoing therapeutic treatment (excluding treatment for substance abuse), as necessary, may be provided for patients only inhabiting the premises for a finite period (see criteria/specific development standards in Section 25.1.W.). Convalescent Home or Nursing Home Shall mean any place or institution which makes provisions for bed care or for chronic or convalescent care for one (1) or more persons exclusive of relatives who, by reason of illness or physical infirmity, are unable to properly care for themselves. Alcoholics, drug C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 6\@BCL@5C166D06\@BCL@5C166D06.doc Town of Oro Valley Attorney’s Office/ca/1024085 addicts, persons with mental diseases and persons with communicable diseases including contagious tuberculosis, shall not be admitted or cared for in these homes licensed under the State of Arizona as a convalescent and nursing home. Community Residence A dwelling unit shared as a primary residence by the disabled, or disabled elderly person, living together as a single housekeeping unit in which staff provides on-site care, training and support for the residents. Such residence or services provided therein shall be licensed by, certified by, approved by, registered with, funded by or through, or under contract with the State of Arizona. Community residence does not include a residence which serves persons as an alternative to incarceration for a criminal offense, or a residence for a criminal offense, or a residence which provides drug and/or alcohol rehabilitation. AMEND the following Section in Chapter 25: Additions shown in ALL CAPS, Deletions shown in strikethrough Section 25.1.E COMMUNITY RESIDENCES ASSISTED LIVING HOME Community Residences ASSISTED LIVING HOMES shall be permitted provided that: 1.No residence is located on a lot with a property line within 1,000 feet, measured in a straight line in any direction, of the lot line of another such Community Residences ; and 1.NO ASSISTED LIVING HOME SHALL BE LOCATED CLOSER THAN 1,000 FEET TO ANOTHER ASSISTED LIVING HOME. THE MINIMUM 1,000 FOOT SEPARATION SHALL BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN PROPERTY LINES, MEASURED ON A STRAIGHT LINE. C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 6\@BCL@5C166D06\@BCL@5C166D06.doc Town of Oro Valley Attorney’s Office/ca/1024086 2.Such ASSISTED LIVING HOME residence contains no more than 6 10 residents AND AN APPROPRIATE NUMBER OF SUPPORT STAFF, or 8 residents, including staff; and 3.Such residence is registered with, and is approved by, the Planning and Zoning Administrator as to compliance with the standards of this Section. 4.Such residence or services provided therein shall be licensed by, certified by, approved by, registered with, funded by or through, or under contract with the State of Arizona. Add the following Additional Requirements in Chapter 25, Section 25.1 for Senior Care Facility X.SENIOR CARE FACILITY: 1.RECREATIONAL AREA: SENIOR CARE FACILITIES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 26.5.B, SECTION 26.5.C AND SECTION 26.5.D OF THE ZONING CODE. a. THE TERM DWELLING UNIT IN SECTION 26.5.C. SHALL INCLUDE BEDS, BEDROOMS AND LIVING UNITS FOR THE PURPOSES OF CALCULATING THE AMOUNT OF RECREATIONAL AREA. b. THE RECREATIONAL AREA SHALL PROVIDE AMENITIES TO MEET THE RECREATIONAL NEEDS RESIDENTS AND GUESTS OF THE FACILITY. THE MINIMUM RECREATIONAL AREA MAY BE DIVIDED BETWEEN MULTIPLE AREAS THROUGHOUT THE DEVELOPMENT. c.SENIOR CARE FACILITIES ARE EXEMPT FROM PRIVATE OUTDOOR LIVING SPACE REQUIREMENTS OF THE APPLICABLE ZONING DISTRICT. C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 6\@BCL@5C166D06\@BCL@5C166D06.doc Town of Oro Valley Attorney’s Office/ca/1024087 Additional minor amendments throughout the Zoning Code to change references to deleted or modified uses have been incorporated as follows: Additions shown in ALL CAPS, Deletions shown in strikethrough Section 23.7.E.6.b. Recreational Facilities Wherever there is constructed a multiple dwelling which has twenty (20) or more dwelling units, there shall be provided on the lot site of said multiple dwellings a play area for children. Said play area shall be separated from any private access ways and public streets by a fence or wall. The tot lot requirement may SHALL be excluded from a senior citizens development SENIOR CARE FACILITIES. Section 23.8.B. C-N Neighborhood Commercial District 1. Floor Area Limits … c. The aforementioned square footage limits do not apply to buildings used for residential, public, institutional, civic, office, rehabilitative and skilled nursing care AND SENIOR CARE purposes. Section 27.7.D. Parking Lots – Required Number of Spaces for Type of Use 1. Residential Parking Requirements: Residential uses shall provide a minimum number of parking spaces as defined by the standards below. Any increase or decrease in parking shall be in accordance with subsection C.2 of this section. … e. Boarding Houses/Group Homes /Religious Quarters/Mature Adult Retirement Quarters/Rehabilitative/Skilled Nursing SENIOR Care Facilities: One (1) per bedroom or bed plus one (1) for each four (4) bedrooms or beds for guest parking, plus two (2) for every three (3) employees. C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 6\@BCL@5C166D06\@BCL@5C166D06.doc Town of Oro Valley Attorney’s Office/ca/1024088 Table 27-14 Allowed Parking Spaces Health Facilities … b. Long Term Care Facilities. 33/bed, 1 per employee based on maximum shift Design Standards Addendum “A”, Section 2.1.P.1 P. Senior Housing/Assisted Living SENIOR CARE FACILITY Design 1. Independent living, assisted living, and skilled nursing SENIOR CARE Facilities, including continuum of care facilities, shall provide the following features and amenities: Section 27.10.D.3.f.vi.b).5.B).vii).(C).(5).(c) (c)Hospitals/extended SENIOR Care Facilities exceeding two (2) stories or thirty (30) feet in height. C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 6\@BCL@5C166D06\@BCL@5C166D06.doc Town of Oro Valley Attorney’s Office/ca/1024089 Amend Table 23-1 as follows: EXISTING TABLE 23 -1 : Permitted Us es PEelFIe USE TI PE RI -300 RI -14 4 RH2 RI-43 Rl -:J.6 RI -20 RH O RH '4 '4' " « " ,~, ,~, " H ~, ADDl REGS ommun Residences , , , , , , , SeC1lOO 25 .1.E looepooden t livi F3C ~ , , , , e ha bilitali>e Care F acilil)' , , , killed NIX ' Care Fae , , , PROPOSED (A REAS OF CHANG E SH ADED) TABLE 2 3 -1 : Permitted Us e s PECI FIC USE TIPE RI -300 RI -144 RH2 Rt-43 Rt -:J.6 RI -20 R H O RI -7 '4 '4' " « " ,~, n " H ~, "DD L REGS • • • • • • • sSisled liv -, , , , , , , , , , Se ctioo 25. I.E C C • C SeC1lOO 25 .1.X C C C C C C care Faa , , , , , Secuoo 25.1.X