HomeMy WebLinkAboutPackets - Council Packets (117)
*AMENDED (2/2/15, 3:00 PM)
AGENDA
ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL
REGULAR SESSION
February 4, 2015
ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
11000 N. LA CAÑADA DRIVE
REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 5:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
EXECUTIVE SESSION - Pursuant to ARS 38-431.03(A)(3) and 38-431.03(A)(4) in order to receive
legal advice, consider its position and instruct its attorneys regarding possible litigation relating to a
claim filed by Dennis and Judy Merens and pursuant to ARS 38-431.03 (A)(3) and 38-431.03 (A)(4) for
discussion of legal advice and to instruct its attorneys on the Arrett/Lamonna lawsuit
REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS
COUNCIL REPORTS
DEPARTMENT REPORTS
The Mayor and Council may consider and/or take action on the items listed below:
ORDER OF BUSINESS: MAYOR WILL REVIEW THE ORDER OF THE MEETING
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
1. Public Safety Providers Quarterly Reports (Oct. - Dec. 2014)
CALL TO AUDIENCE – At this time, any member of the public is allowed to address the Mayor and
Town Council on any issue not listed on today’s agenda. Pursuant to the Arizona Open Meeting
Law, individual Council Members may ask Town Staff to review the matter, ask that the matter be placed
on a future agenda, or respond to criticism made by speakers. However, the Mayor and Council may
not discuss or take legal action on matters raised during “Call to Audience.” In order to speak during
“Call to Audience” please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card.
PRESENTATIONS
1. Presentation of State Planning Award to Your Voice Volunteers for Best Public Outreach on
a General/Comprehensive Plan for Your Voice, Our Future Phase 1, as recognized by the
Arizona Chapter of the American Planning Association
CONSENT AGENDA
(Consideration and/or possible action)
A. Minutes - January 21, 2015
B. Resolution No. (R)15-12, authorizing and approving Amendment #1 to the
Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) between Pima County and the Town of Oro Valley for
the Pima County Wireless Integrated Network (PCWIN) subscriber services
C. Reappointment of the representative to the Regional Transportation Authority's (RTA)
Citizens Accountability for Regional Transportation (CART) Committee
D. Approval to amend the adopted FY 2014/15 budget allocation for the Aquatic Center
Parking Expansion Project in the General Government Capital Improvement Project (CIP)
Fund
REGULAR AGENDA
1. PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING AN
APPLICATION FOR A SERIES 14 (PRIVATE CLUB) LIQUOR LICENSE FOR ORO
VALLEY COUNTRY CLUB LOCATED AT 300 W. GREENOCK DRIVE
2. PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING AN
APPLICATION FOR A SERIES 6 (BAR) LIQUOR LICENSE FOR ORO VALLEY COUNTRY
CLUB LOCATED AT 300 W. GREENOCK DRIVE
3. PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT REQUEST FOR A PROPOSED AUTOBODY REPAIR USE FOR CALIBER
COLLISION LOCATED NORTH OF PUSCH VIEW LANE, APPROXIMATELY 1/4-MILE
WEST OF ORACLE ROAD
4.AMENDING SECTION 24.9, ECONOMIC EXPANSION ZONE (EEZ) OF THE ORO VALLEY
ZONING CODE REVISED (OVZCR)
a. RESOLUTION NO. (R)15-13, DECLARING THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE ORO
VALLEY ZONING CODE SECTION 24.9 AND CHAPTER 24, RELATING TO ECONOMIC
EXPANSION ZONE OVERLAY DISTRICT, PROVIDED AS EXHIBIT “A” WITHIN THE
ATTACHED RESOLUTION AND FILED WITH THE TOWN CLERK, A PUBLIC RECORD
b. PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE NO. (O)15-05, AMENDING SECTION 24.9, ECONOMIC
EXPANSION ZONE (EEZ) OVERLAY DISTRICT, OF THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE
REVISED TO ELIMINATE THE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS AND ALLOW
ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL OF ALTERNATIVE PARKING RATIOS
5.AMENDING SECTION 22.3.D.2.b.ii AND SECTION 27.10.F.2.c.iii.h OF THE ORO VALLEY
ZONING CODE REVISED (OVZCR) REGARDING APPROVAL PROCESS FOR FLEX
DESIGN OPTIONS; MODIFIED REVIEW PROCESS; AND TENTATIVE DEVELOPMENT
PLAN CHANGES
a. RESOLUTION NO. (R)15-14, DECLARING THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO
CHAPTER 22 OF THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE AT SECTION 22.3 AND CHAPTER
27 OF THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED AT SECTION 27.10, PROVIDED
HERETO AS EXHIBIT “A” WITHIN THE ATTACHED RESOLUTION AND FILED WITH
THE TOWN CLERK, A PUBLIC RECORD
b. PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE NO. (O)15-06, AMENDING SECTION 22.3.D.2.b AND
SECTION 27.10.F.2.c., TO AMEND THE APPROVAL PROCESS FOR
ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE LANDS FLEXIBLE DESIGN OPTIONS, ALLOW
FOR ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL OF NON-SUBSTANTIAL CHANGES TO A
TENTATIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN UNDER A MODIFIED REVIEW PROCESS AND
AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 22.3.D.2.b TO CLARIFY WHAT TENTATIVE
DEVELOPMENT PLAN CHANGES ARE CONSIDERED SIGNIFICANT
6. REVISION TO THE STONE CANYON II FINAL PLAT FOR LOT 167 AT 1055 W.
TORTOLITA MOUNTAIN DRIVE WITHIN RANCHO VISTOSO, NEIGHBORHOOD
11 BY REMOVING THE DESIGNATED "NO-BUILD AREA" AND ALLOWING
ENCROACHMENT INTO 25% OR GREATER SLOPES
7. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE DIRECTION REGARDING GROUNDWATER
PRESERVATION FEES
8. *DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE DIRECTION TO STAFF TO AMEND THE
ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE LANDS (ESL) SECTION OF THE CODE
(Removed from the agenda on 2/2/15 at 3:00 p.m.)
9. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE DIRECTION TO STAFF REGARDING THE
IMPLEMENTATION OF ORDINANCE (O)14-17, AMENDING THE TAX CODE OF THE
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY TO INCREASE THE LOCAL TRANSACTION PRIVILEGE TAX
(TPT) RATE FROM 2% TO 2.5% IN VARIOUS CATEGORIES
10. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE DIRECTION REGARDING POSTPONEMENT OF THE
FINAL PURCHASE OF THE EL CONQUISTADOR GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB AND
ASSOCIATED PROPERTIES
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS (The Council may bring forth general topics for future meeting agendas.
Council may not discuss, deliberate or take any action on the topics presented pursuant to ARS
38-431.02H)
CALL TO AUDIENCE – At this time, any member of the public is allowed to address the Mayor and
Town Council on any issue not listed on today’s agenda. Pursuant to the Arizona Open Meeting
Law, individual Council Members may ask Town Staff to review the matter, ask that the matter be
placed on a future agenda, or respond to criticism made by speakers. However, the Mayor and Council
may not discuss or take legal action on matters raised during “Call to Audience.” In order to speak
during “Call to Audience” please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker
card.
ADJOURNMENT
POSTED: 1/28/15 at 5:00 p.m. by mrs
AMENDED AGENDA POSTED: 2/2/15 at 5:00 p.m. by mrs
When possible, a packet of agenda materials as listed above is available for public inspection at least 24
hours prior to the Council meeting in the office of the Town Clerk between the hours of 8:00 a.m. –
5:00p.m.
The Town of Oro Valley complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If any person with a
disability needs any type of accommodation, please notify the Town Clerk’s Office at least five days prior
to the Council meeting at 229-4700.
INSTRUCTIONS TO SPEAKERS
Members of the public have the right to speak during any posted public hearing. However, those
items not listed as a public hearing are for consideration and action by the Town Council during
the course of their business meeting. Members of the public may be allowed to speak on these
topics at the discretion of the Chair.
If you wish to address the Town Council on any item(s) on this agenda, please complete a speaker card
located on the Agenda table at the back of the room and give it to the Town Clerk. Please indicate on
the speaker card which item number and topic you wish to speak on, or if you wish to speak
during “Call to Audience”, please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue
speaker card.
Please step forward to the podium when the Mayor announces the item(s) on the agenda which you are
interested in addressing.
1. For the record, please state your name and whether or not you are a Town resident.
2. Speak only on the issue currently being discussed by Council. Please organize your speech, you will
only be allowed to address the Council once regarding the topic being discussed.
3. Please limit your comments to 3 minutes.
4. During “Call to Audience” you may address the Council on any issue you wish.
5. Any member of the public speaking must speak in a courteous and respectful manner to those present.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Town Council Regular Session Item # 1.
Meeting Date:02/04/2015
Submitted By:Arinda Asper, Town Manager's Office
Information
Subject
Public Safety Providers Quarterly Reports (Oct. - Dec. 2014)
Attachments
Public Safety Providers Quarterly Reports (Oct. - Dec. 2014)
GRFD Quarterly Reports (Oct. - Dec. 2014)
MVFD Quarterly Reports (Oct. - Dec. 2014)
ORO r ALLEY POLICE "", '(\Jlrl
2014 TOTAL I JAN PBB MAR I APR MAY
T",I C,II , 170321 1423 1325 14021 "'( 1432
I V,h 1801 1< ,. 23 16 , , ., 2 0 , , 0 2 0
All """I,,, A"emp" 1
Th el" 5591 53 31 '0 '2 38
Veh'de Thel" 21 0 (
j S.ol" V,h'd" 0 0 (
I Veh'de The{" 0 0 0 0
OU I 1961 13 17 24 1 16
C'oo" C,w, 33 6
10 ", Ollen", 143 1~ 17 9 ,. ,.
0 C a 0 0 0
IRobbm C a 0 0
1"",,1t 107 5 • 12 10
ITo,"1 AITem 16M 13 174 147 150 1<2
; j c"" 8091 OC 66 " 48 63
IAI"m, ; I 7 .. " 49 6 4 65 73
IAI"m, rH, , .. 1 .. , " 21 29 42 44
IK9 Se",h .. "'" " 25 2' 52 60
IFI". Aid C,Il, 265 11 217 204 233 243 247
IF",'. .; ( c a a 0
S&l 4, 5C 50 50 48
> nh"'c)' 3914 "" 367 332 394 369
IIV""," ',O,d.,,· 5095 51' 736 401 46' 627
IPobll, 8231 7. ., 66 78 77
IRe,me Moo Hoo" 17! 26 .. .. 36 27
504. 577 425 1 363 1 44 ' 65.1
, T,,' >'"co AIT." 3< t .~ ~
f" do" d.Ioy"" roo" 30 doy' do . , """,0, om ' moy" op","d' ,
•• OUI Accld~nrj ort Included in Fa tal Accident and Accident to tals.
····Publlc A.lli,fS· num~fS are separaled from CVAP Public AsJist nUmbtfl
,
N n n'A1>V
JUN JUL AUG I SEP OCT NOV DIle
132, 1491 1595 1 1,79 1466 1307 1m
19 11 32 26 9
5 5 5 5
0 0
0 0
" 35 56 90 " 37 " C 2
c a 0 0
c a 0 0
t: t: 17 13 13 21 2:
1 2 2 2
5 1C _1 1< II 9
0 ( e c a a
0 0 e c a
8 10 t: IC 9 8
156 103 15( 128 126 138 109
64 63 OJ 120 • " 73
79 91 • 4 " '" '3 6 •
51 40 50 4C 49 29 39
20 19 24 '" ,. 17 6
193 242 219 19( 23e 207 226
0 ( e
41 29 ,3 --'& " 62 6C
250 '05 4.9 26. 23< 3" ..
254 252 737 326 393 1 390 1 ..
52 49 93 71 63 41 67
55 9 0 " 9 (
416 563 49 7 332 22. 264 27£
Q -" ,~
DIJclalmer: Numbe rs may show s/iqhf/luctuations WIlM compar .. d to pr .. viousl), publlsh .. d rPports b«ous .. of 'hoflg~ ifl th .. ,oIP data w,thifllh .. !)'St .. m du .. to flormol odJustmtflts. TIl .. mar .. '"Unt cos ..
counts or .. lh .. mosll,k .. 1y to fluctuot ... Although thi! data moy,hoflgt !Iighrly, il'J 01 ""ural .. OJ,/ COfi bt tor rh .. dora ,oll .. cr .. d duriflg this tim .. ptriad
E"<I of~" )"'.' .."j,t .......... 11." j."" •• y 12·1& 2Q15!G ~pdal" "<",1b".~ ""'If" 01 ... ,."" .. o. !GUlla ha"" r;!.ll'g.od
4th Quarter 2014
Oct-Dec Oct-Dec Oct-Dec
2012 2013 2014
Total Ca ll s 4346 4247 4 151
Com me rcial Veh Enfo r cement 8 1 59 14
Residential Bu r g laries 18 12 14
Non-Res id e ntial Bu rglar ies 4 5 3
All Bur gla r y Attempts 4 1 4
Thefts 143 162 130
Ve hi cle Th e ft s 7 4 9
Recovered Stolen Vehicles 2 0 0
Attempted Vehicle Thefts 0 1 0
DUl Arrests 35 36 56
Liquor Law s 6 8 5
Dr ug Offen ses 31 30 34
Homicide s 1 0 0
Robbery 2 2 1
Assau lt 34 20 24
Tota l Arr ests 388 430 373
Assigned Cases 155 173 197
Ala r ms (Reside ntial) 179 199 174
Alarm s (Business) 12 6 133 11 7
K9 Searche s 272 104 37
Fir st Aid Ca ll s 706 684 663
Fatal Accidents* 0 0 0
Accidents* 16 2 16 6 176
Citat io ns (T r affic)** 1430 1245 602
Written Warnings/Repair Orde r s** 1250 1413 783
Public Assists*** 256 240 178
Reserve Man Ho urs 183 11 7 9
Business Checks*** 170 8 2401 77 1
Drug Task Force Ar r est 1 4 8
CVAP Dark Ho use Cks 2001 2067 2728
CVA P Publi c Assists 2 13 106 139
CVA P Tota l Ho urs 3519.5 3858 35 19 .. .. . Fatal Accidents & Accidents categones now Inc lude DUI-related fatal accidents & accidents . Numbers subject to fluctuate slightly due to
reclassification.
""Written WamingsIRepair Orders-category now replaces "Warnings· and "Repair Orders' categories . Previous year totals updated to reflect the change .
Traffic data delayed for data entry backlog .
····Business checks' now a separate category from "Dark House Checks', Public Assist totals no longer include CVAP numbers .
ORO VALLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT
MONTHLY BREAKDOWN OF CITATIONS BY VIOLATION
201 4 ~AN28 FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP
rrOWN CODE 24 15 21 27 32 22 7
TITLE 28 VIOLAT IO NS
~IZE. WEIGHT. LOAD c:::§] 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 1
INSURANCE VIOlATION 903 102 79 7 1 78 76 52 104 151
REGISTRATION VIOlATION 414 39 40 46 23 34 31 39 53
DRIVERS LICENSE VIOlATION 381 36 42 26 34 40 30 29 44
DUI ARRESTS 174 13 17 24 14 16 13 13 17
RECKLESS/AGGRESSIVE DRIVING 17 0 1 0 0 2 4 1 2
SPEEDING 1274 156 12 3 90 157 120 61 162 14 5
lANE VIOlATIONS 169 20 10 20 17 2 1 16 11 14
RED LIGHT 106 14 9 6 13 4 11 9 9
STOP SIGN 39 5 0 5 8 6 1 2 5
FAILURE TO YIELD 9 1 9 9 7 6 13 5 3 5
SEA TBELT VIOlATION 77 6 9 6 6 3 6 7 19
CHILD RESTRAINT 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4
EQUIPMENT VIOlATIONS 68 5 3 9 3 11 3 5 10
PARKING 9 0 0 1 2 2 1 0 1
LITTERING 8 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0
OTHER CITATIONS 19 1 32 25 20 32 20 13 15 13
IT, ,. r , 391 4 438 368 332 394 369 251 401 493
Ba sed on further Investlgotlon and updatmg of in/ormation, actual clossificatlons may change resulting In small VQflonces In counts.
·DUls are arrest counts, nor cirotions counts, and may change like arrest figures do
7
1
6 1
29
26
13
3
89
14
8
1
7
5
1
3
0
0
5
266
OCT NOV DEC
2 10
0 0
54 75
30 50
26 48
13 21
1 3
67 10 4
9 7
6 16
1 5
14 13
3 7
0 2
3 3
1 1
2 1
6 10
236 366
ORO VALLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT
October throlU(h December 2014
Priority 1 # of call s % Priority 2 # of ca ll s %
Total Response Time Total Response Time
Goal: Total Response (5 minutes 90% o f the time Goa l : Total Re spons e <8 minutes 90% of the tim e
< 5 minutes I 44 I 83% < 8 minutesl 178 I 89%
> 5 minut e~l 9 I 17% > 8 minutes I 21 I ll %
Total Calls I 53 Total Calls I 199
Average Overall Response Time 3.31 Averag e Overall Response Time 4·31
Priority 3 # of call s % Priority 4 # of call s %
Total Response Time Total Resconse Time
Goal: Total Response < 15 minutes 90% of the time Goal: Total Response <30 minutes 90% o f th e time
< 1 5 minutes I 964 I 93% < 30 min utes I 2115 I 98'k
> 15 minutes I 7 1 I 7% > 30 minutes I 45 I 2'k
Total Calls I 1035 Total Calls I 2160 .. Average Overall Response rime 8·04 Average Overall Response Time S·ll
Golder Ranch Fire District -Oro Valley
Call Summary
2 nd Quarter FY 2014 -2015 (Oct. -Dec. 2014)
Sun City Station 374 # of calls 0/0
Di spa tc h to At Scene <5:00 minutes -EMS 208 68%
Dispatch to At Scene <6:00 minutes -FIRE I 100 %
Average Dispatch to At Scene Time 4:53
Woodburne Station 375 # of calls %
Di spatc h to A t Scene <5:00 minutes -EMS 480 47%
Dispatch to At Scene <6:00 minutes -FIRE 4 100%
Average Dispatch to At Scene Time 5:18
Lambert Station 376 # of calls 0/0
Di spatc h to At Scene <5:00 minutes -EMS 210 60%
Di spatc h to At Scene <6:00 minutes -FIRE 1 0%
Average Dispatch to At Scene Time 5:05
Oracle Rd. Station 377 # of calls °/0
Di spatc h to At Scene <5 :00 m inu tes -EMS 225 74%
D ispatch to At Scene <6 :0 0 minutes -FIRE 1 100%
Average Dispatcb to At Sce ne Time 4:22
Average Total ALI Oro Valley Stations # of calls %
Di s patch to At Sce ne <5:00 minutes -EMS 1123 62%
Dispatch to At Sce ne <6:00 minutes -FIRE 7 83%
Averaae Dispatch to At Scene Time 4:50
Average Total All Oro Valley Stations _2nd Fire Unit # of calls %
2 nd F ire Un it Di spatch to At Scene <8:00 minutes -F IRE 5 I 60%
Average Di s patch to At Scene Time for 2 nd Fire U nit 7:24
Golder Ranch· Oro Valley Call Load Breakdown
2nd Quarter FY 2014 -2015 (Oct.· Dec. 2014)
Final Type Reference
CALL TYPE Sun City Woodburne Lambert Oracle
Ai rcraft
Brush! Vegetation 1
Building 1
Electrical ! Motor 2
Fires -All Other 2 1 1 1
Gas Leak 1 1
Hazmat 1 1
Trash ! Rubish 1
Unauthorized Burning
Vehicle
Total Fire Calls 4 6 2 2
I
Animal Problem
Animal Rescue
Assist -Other 30 43 34 16
Battery Change 9 11 2 10
Bee Swarm
Defective Appliance
Invalid Assist 41 18 9 16
Snake 65 106 90 67
Lockout 1 1
Fire Now Out 1
Total Service Calls 145 179 136 110 ,
Al arm s (Fir e, Smoke . CO) 5 19 8 10
Cance lled ! Ne gati ve Incident 16 19 6 15
Sm oke ! Od or Inv es ta(Jat ion 1 3 7 7
Total Good Intent Calls 22 41 21 32
I
Motor Ve hi cle Acc iden t 7 14 22 16
Rescue (high , trench , wate r )
All Othe r EMS Incidents 201 466 188 209
Total EMS Type Calls 208 480 210 225
I
TOTAL ALL CALLS 379 706 369 369
,-
,-
TOTAL
1
1
2
5
2
2
1
14
!
123
32
84
328
2
1
570
I
42
56
18
116
I
59
1064
1123
1
1823
Golder Ranch Fire District -Oro Valley
Detailed Fire Response Report
Date Call # Type
10/911 4 23389 HOUSE
St.375
2 nd Quarter FY 2014-2015
(October -December 2014)
Disp. Time Unit Respond On-scene
10 :31:32 LT3 75 10 :32:16 10:37 :59
EN376 10 :32:07 10:39 :18
Total Resp. Time
5:27
7:46
Hom e ow ne r ca ll ed to repo rt th at there is s m oke co min g from in s ide ga rage. Upon arriva l, LT375 found
s moke and fl a m es in sid e th e garage. Det e rmined to be the wa ter heat e r that ignited pap e rs stored nex t to
it caus in g the fire . No further extens ion int o th e s tructur e. WORKING INCIDENT.
Date Call # Type Disp. time Unit Respond On-scene Total Resp. Time
1111114 25544 BUILD 07 :18:15 LD375 07:20:15 07 :22:48 5 :03
St.375 EN377 07:20:18 07:26:34 8:19
Fire a larm so undin g a nd smoke ca n be seen from a c h urc h . Upon in ves ti gation , LD375 could o nl y
detect a s li ght o dor po ss ibl y com in g from the HV AC sys tem. NEGATIV E INCIDENT .
Date Call # Type Disp. time Unit Respond On-scene Total Resp. Time
12/8114 28847 INVEST 22:3 \:14 * EN377 22:3 1:14 * 22 :3 I: 19* :05*
St.377 HOUSE 22:32:4 1 EN376 22 :34:2 4 22:40:42 8 :01
*Ca ll was initiat ed b y th e resident co min g d ir ec tl y to th e fir e station to report s moke in s id e th e ir hou se
down the s treet. EN377 notifi ed di s patch of the ca ll w hil e responding and req uested add iti o na l unit s to
res pond . Smoke found to be coming fro m a n e lec tri c fan in th e bathroom. Ass isted in removing smoke
from the hou se. NEGATIV E INC ID ENT.
Date Call # Type Disp. time Unit Respond On-scene Total Resp. Time
1211 011 4 28981 HOUSE 19:49:06 EN374 19:49:45 19:53:58 4:52
St.374
Ca ll e r reported th at the y sm e ll so methin g b urning in th e garage. EN374 arrives o n scene to find nothing
and req ues ts ot he r re s ponding unit s to s hut down code 2. Fou nd to be a gas leak at th e fu rn ace. Sou th
West Gas notified. NEGATIV E INCIDENT.
Date Call # Type Disp. time Unit Respond On-scene Total Resp. Time
1211 611 4 2943 1 HO USE 12:20: 13 LT375 12:2 1:05 12 :26:42 6:29
St.376 EN376 12:22:12 12:26:54 6:41
Res id e nt ca ll ed to indicate smoke was filling up in sid e the ho me. Found to be burnt food in ove n .
NEAGAT IVE INCIDENT.
Date Call # Type Disp. time Unit Respond On-scene Total Resp. Time
1211 611 4 29453 HOUSE 19:09:22 LT375 19 :09:49 19:14 :23 5:01
St.375 EN376 19:1 1:1 9 19 :1 5:43 6:21
Ca llin g part y reports that the ir e lectrical box is producing s m oke . Upon in vestiga ti on, LT375 found a
faulty breaker box that contro ls the HVAC sys tem. No fir e exte n sio n . NEGAT IVE INC IDENT.
Date Call # Ty pe Disp. time Unit Respond On-scene Total Resp. Time
1211 811 4 295 88 HOUSE 09:02:2 0 EN376 09:02:5 1 09:08:01 * 5:4 1 *
St.375
Ca ll ing party report s they see smoke coming from a hou se beh ind his, po ss ibly on Tall Grass D r?
*EN376 in the reported area with not h ing s howing. A ll units can s h ut down. NEGATIVE INCIDENT
Golder Ranch Fire District -2nd Quarter FY 2014-2015 (Oct. -Dec. 2014) -Oro Valley Report Summary
All GRFD Oro Valley Stations Tim e #of Calls Adopted Standard % Actual % Description of Variance
Dispatch to At Scene -FIRE < 6 :00 7 90% 83%
Time to achieve Adopted Standa rd of 90 % 6 :29
,
Average Dispatch to At Sc ene Time 5:22
Dispat c h to At Scene -EMS I < 5:00 1123 90% 62% Far end of area
Time to achieve Adopted Standard of 90 % 7:21 Traffic congestion at 1st and Oracle
Gated community at Moore and La Canada area
Many residential streets
Dirt road
Out on a drill when call was dispatched
Heavy rain
Average Dispatch to At Scene T ime 4 :50
2nd Fire Unit Dispatch to At Scene < 8:00 5 90% 60%
Time to achieve Adopted Standard of 90% 8 :19
Average Dispatch to At Sce ne Time 7:24
SWA -Oro Valley Transport Units Time #of Call s Adopted Actual % Description of Varian c e
Dispatch to At Scene· ALS Transport Unit < 8:00 350 90% 94% Calls are in comp liance
Time to achieve Adopted Standard of 90 % Achieved
Average Dispatch to At Scene Time 7:34
Mountain Vista Fire District -Oro Valley
Call Summary
2nd Quarter FY 2014-2015 (Oct. -Dec. 2014)
Station 610 (Magee Rd.) # of calls %
Di spatch to At Scen e <5:00 minut es -EMS 34 85%
Di s patch to At Scen e <6 :00 minute s -F IRE 12 92%
Average Dispatch to At Scene Time 4:01
Station 620 (Shannon Rd.) # of calls 0/0
Dispatch to At Scene <5:00 minutes -EMS 0 0%
Di s patch to At Scene <6:00 mi nute s -F I RE 0 0 %
Average Dispatch to At Scene Time 0
Averaoe Total All Oro Valley Stations # of calls %
Dis[latch to At Scen e <5:00 minutes -EMS 34 85%
Di s patch to At Scene <6:00 minutes -FIRE 12 92%
Average Dispatch to At Sce ne Time 4:01
Averaoe Total All Oro Valley Stations _2nd Fire Unit # of calls 0/0
2 nd Fire U nit Dispatch to At Scene <8:00 minutes -FIRE I I 0%
Average Dispatch to At Scene Time for 2 nd Fire Unit 7:33
Mountain Vista Fire District -Oro Valley Call Load Breakdown
2nd Quarter FY 2014-2015 (Oct. -Dec. 2014)
Final Type Reference
CALL TYPE MVFD
Aircraft
Brush! Vegeta tion 1
Building
Electrical! Motor
Fires -All Other
Gas Leak 1
Hazmat 1
Trash! Rubish
Unauthorized Burning
Vehicle
Total Fire Calls 3
I
Animal Problem
Animal Rescue
Assist -Other 2
Battery Change
Bee Swarm
Defective Appliance
Invalid Assist 3
Snake 15
Lockout 1
Fire Now Out 1
Total Service Calls 22
I
Alarms (Fi re . Smoke. CO) 7
Cancelled! Negative Incident
Smoke! Odor In vestagation 4
Total Good Intent Calls 11 ,
Moto r Veh icle Acci de nt 6
Rescue (h igh , trenc h , wate r)
All Other EM S Inc idents 58
Total EMS Type Calls 64
I
TOTAL ALL CALLS 100
Mountain Vista Fire District -Oro Valley
Detailed Fire Response Report
2nd Quarter FY 2014 -2015
(October -December 2014)
Date Call# Type Disp. Time Unit Respond On-scene Total Resp . Time
1011 0/20 14 N 142 83 0024 FLAM 9:30:52 EN610 9:32:03 9:35:50 0:03:47
St. 6 10
REQUEST FOR AL'ITI -FREEZE CLEAN-UP POST MOTOR VEHICLE COLLISION, NO INJURIES.
NEGATIVE INCIDENT.
Date Call# Type Disp. Time Unit Respond On-scene Total Resp. Time
10/21 /20 14 N I42940003 FUNK 0:57:09 EN610 0:58:58 1 :02 :36 0:03:38
St. 610
PRIORITY RESPONSE TO A LARGE MULTI PUMP GAS STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE WITH A
FULLY INVOLVED GAS PUMP FIRE. PUMP WAS NO LONGER ATTACHED TO THE FUEL SOURCE
DUE TO IT BEING RAN OVER BY A VEHICLE AND PUSHED INTO THE MIDDLE OF THE DRIVE WAY.
OVPD ON SCENE STATING EMERGENCY PUMP SHUT OFF HAD BEEN ACTIVATE D. OVPD OFFICER
ALSO STATED HE HAD HEARD A LOUD EXPLOSION FROM ACROSS THE STREET WHERE I-IE HAD
BEEN SITTING AT HIS DESK. HE RUSHED OUTSIDE AND SAW THAT A VEHICLE HAD COLLIDED
WITH THE GAS PUMP AT THE GAS STATION AND THE PUMP WAS ON FIRE APPROX. 10 YARDS
FROM IT ORIGINAL LOCATION. AT WI-IICH TIME HE STARTED FIRE TO THE SCENE. E6 10 CREWS
EXTINGUISHED FIRE AND FOUND THAT THE DRIVER OF THE VEHICLE WAS NOT INJURED.
WORKING INCIDENT .
Date Call# Type Disp. Time Unit Respond On-scene Total Resp. Time
10 /21120 14 N 14 2940047 ALM 10:56:07 EN610 10:57:54 10:59 :54 0:02:00
St. 6 10
PRIORITY RESPONSE FOR FIRE AL'ID BURGLER ALARl'\1 ACTIVATION. OVPD ON SCENE FIRST,
ADVISING THAT THERE WAS NO FIRE. NEGATIVE INCIDENT.
,-
Date Call# Type Disp. Time Unit
,-
Respond On-scene Total Resp. Time
1111 /20 14 N 143050045 ALM 12:55:06 EN6 10 12:56:31 12:59: 19 0:02:48
S t. 610
PRIORITY RESPONSE FOR REPORT OF SMOKE ALARl'\1 ACTIVATION IN A PRIVAT E RESIDENCE.
ON SCENE OWNER ADVISED THAT THERE WAS NO F IRE AND THAT THE SMOKE ALARl'\1 HAD
TRIGGERED FROM OVEN GREASE. NEGATIVE INCIDENT.
1
Date Call# Type Disp. Time Unit Respond On-scene Total Resp. Time
11 /2/2014 N 143060029 BRSH II :55:23 EN610 11:56:11 12:00:58 0:04:47
St. 6 10
PRIORITY RESPONSE, BEFORE ARRIVAL ENGINE 610 WAS NOTIFIED BY FIRE ALARM THAT FIRE
WAS EXTINGUISHED BY RESIDENT. ENGINE 610 CONTINUED IN TO INVESTIGATE AND FOUND
HOME OWNER EXTINGUISHING SMALL 2'X2' PILE OF COOKlJ"G COALS THAT HE STATES HE
PLACED ON TOP OF A PACK RATS NEST THINKING THE ASH WOULD DETOUR THE RATS. ENGINE
610 ASSISTED RESIDENT WITH MAKING SURE FrRE WAS OUT. NEGATIVE INCIDENT .
Date Call# Type Disp. Time Unit Respond On-scene Total Resp. Time
111 17 /2014 N I 432 10100 FO 18:42:2 8 EN610 18:43:40 18:46:44 0:03:04
St. 6 10
PRIORITY RESPONSE TO TRADER JOES; THERE WAS A FIRE IN A REFRIDGERATOR THAT AN
EMPLOYEE HAS PUT OUT WITH FIRE EXTINGISHER. CALLER CONCERNED IT MAY FLARE UP
AGAIN AND REQUESTED THE FIRE DEPARTMENT RESPOND TO EVALUATE. EN610 NOTICED A
SMELL OF ELECTRIC BURN IN STORE, BUT NOTHING SHOWING. BlJRJ'IED WIRES FOUND AT
REFRIDGERATOR AND IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE FIRE HAD BEEN EXTINGUISHED
WITHOUT FURTHER THREAT. SCENE TURNED OVER TO ELECTRICIAN ONSCENE. WORKING
INCIDENT .
Date Call# Type Disp. Time Unit Respond On-scene Total Resp. Time
11 /22 /20 14 N I43 260061 GAS 13:10:25 L0610 13:11 :46 13:18:43 0:06:57
St. 610
PRIORITY RESPONSE FOR REPORT OF A NATURAL GAS LINE BREAK. CONSTRUCTION CREWS
STATED THEY HIT AN EST. ONE INCH GAS LINE OUTSIDE OF BLUE STAKE. ENGINE 610 PULLED A
ISO" 1.75 ATTACK LINE AND LIGHTLY SPRAYED DOWN THE AREA TO KEEP DOWN THE STATIC
ELECTRICITY. CREWS NOTIFIED ADJACENT RESIDENTS OF THE SITUATION AND ADVISED THEM
TO EVAC UATE OR STAY IN DOORS. EN610 SET BACK IN A SAFE AREA AND AWAITED SO UTHWEST
GAS TO SECURED THE GAS LINE. WORKING INCIDENT.
1----". Date Call# Type Disp. Time U7t'Respond On-scene Total Resp. Time
11126 /2014 N I4 3300086 ALM 18:24:24 L0610 18:25:45 18:30:26 0:04:41
St. 610
PRIORITY RESPONSE TO A FIRE ALARM ACTIVATION AT A PRIVATE RESIDENCE. HOMEOWNERS
WERE AWAY , AND AFTER AN INVESTIGATION, ENGINE 610 DETERiVIlNED THAT THE ALARiVI
ACTIVATION WAS ACCIDENTAL . NEGATIVE I:'<C ID ENT.
2
Date Call# Type Disp. Time Unit Respond On-scene Total Resp. Time
12 /5120 14 N I 433900 13 ALM 7:35:09 LD6 10 7:37:02 7:42:2 1 0 :05:19
St. 6 10
PRIORITY RESPONSE FOR REPORTED FIRE ALARM ACTrVATrON AT THE HIGH SCHOOL. HIGH
SCHOOL OFFICIAL MET LADDER 6 10 AT THE CURB AND STATED THAT SHE HAD PULLED THE
FIRE ALARM TO EVACUATE THE SCHOOL DUE TO AN ODOR OF GAS. LADDRE 610 REQUESTED
ADDlTrONAL ENGINE CO, BATTALION AND AMBULANCE AND ASSUMED MAGEE COMMAi'iD.
SCHOOL HAD BEEN EVACUATED WITH NEGATrVE NEEDS FOR THE EVACUEES, NO MEDICAL
ISSUES OR INJURIES REPORTED , APPROXIMATELY 78 PEOPLE TOTAL. MAINTENAl"iCE PERSON
STATED THAT THE ODOR SEEMED TO BE COMING FROM THE KITCHEN IN THE BASEMENT.
LADDER 610 CONFIRMED ODOR OF GAS IN BUILDING , SECURED GAS TO THE BUILDING,
OBTAINED PRIMARY ALL CLEAR. THE GAS COMPANY REPORTED NEGATrVE READINGS ON THE
MON ITORS BUT ASKED FOR L610'S ASSISTAl'lCE lJ'I VENTILATING THE BUILDING. SCENE TURNED
OVER TO SOUTHWEST GAS AND SCHOOL OFFICIALS WITH NOTHING FOUND Al"iD SCHOOL
CLEARED BY SOUTHWEST GAS. WORKING INCIDENT.
Date Call# Type Disp. Time Unit Respond On-scene Total Resp. Time
12118 /2014 N I4 3520015 ALM 5:04 :29 EN610 5:06:32 5:10 :23 0:03:5 1
St. 610
PRIORITY RESPONSE FOR REPORT OF AN AUDIO AND VISUAL FIRE ALARM AT A HOTEL.
REPORTING PARTY ON SCENE ADVISED THAT THEY HAVE HAD A PROBLEM WITH ONE PULL
STATrON DUE TO WEATHER RELATED ISSUES. ENGINE 610 DID A SEARCH OF THE ENTIRE
COMPLEX WITH NOTHlJ'IG FOUND AND TURNED THE SCENE BACK OVER TO THE REPORTrNG
PARTY. NEGATrVE INCIDENT .
Date Call# Type Disp. Time Unit Respond On-scene Total Resp. Time
12119 /20 14 NI43530003 ODOR 0:30:04 EN6 10 0:30:13 0:33:22 0:03:09
St. 610
PRIORITY RESPONSE FOR A STRONG ODOR OF NATURAL GAS IN THE AREA. AFTER
INVESTrGATING, ENGlJ"iE 610 FOUND NO HAZZARDS OR LEAKS . NEGATrVE INCIDENT .
3
Mountain Vista Fire District -2nd Quarter FY 2014-2015 (Oct. -Dec. 2014) -Oro Valley Report Summary
All MVFD Oro Valley Stations Time #of Calls Adopted Standard % Actual % Description of Variance
Dispatch to At Scene -FIRE I < 6 :00 12 90 % 9 2%
Time to achieve Adopted Standard of 90 %
Average Dispatch to At Scene Time 4 :0 1
Dispatch to At Scene -EMS I < 5:00 34 90 % 85%
Time to achieve Adopted Standard of 90%
Average Dispatch to At Scene Time 3 2 4
2nd Fire Unit Dispatch to At Scene < 8:00 1 9 0% 0%
Time to achieve Adopted Standard of 90%
Average Dispatch to At Scene Time 7:33
Town Council Regular Session Item # 1.
Meeting Date:02/04/2015
Presentation of State Planning Award to Your Voice Volunteers
Information
Subject
Presentation of State Planning Award to Your Voice Volunteers for Best Public Outreach on a
General/Comprehensive Plan for Your Voice, Our Future Phase 1, as recognized by the Arizona Chapter
of the American Planning Association
Summary
Oro Valley received an award for Best Public Outreach General/Comprehensive Plan category from the
Arizona Chapter of the American Planning Association (APA), for its work on Phase 1—Let’s Talk—of the
Your Voice, Our Future project. Your Voice, Our Future is the Town’s general plan update, as required
every ten years by Arizona state statute.
The Arizona Chapter of the APA annually honors Arizonans who have made “outstanding planning
achievements to the planning profession and their communities. The APA Arizona awards program is an
important service to the membership for statewide recognition and celebration of the outstanding work of
professional planners, citizen planners and others in making our communities a better place to live.”
This success could not have been achieved without the support of numerous 'Your Voice Volunteers',
who shared their knowledge and time by brainstorming ideas and attending community events. It was
critical that the early stages of public participation be inclusive and community-driven – and the volunteers
made it happen. Over the course of several months, it seemed almost every event happening in the
community had a booth and a Your Voice Volunteer. From farmers markets to school classrooms to HOA
meetings they helped us gather the critical input needed to guide the future of the community.
Effective community outreach is essential as the Town works toward updating its General Plan, which will
guide and inform critical decisions about the Town’s future. The Council-adopted Public Participation
Plan for Your Voice, Our Future was developed and implemented during Phase 1 of the project with
great success.
The results of the first phase of community outreach were used to form the Council-approved Vision and
Guiding Principles, which serves as a framework for the rest of the process. Currently three resident
committees are using the Vision and Guiding Principles to shape goals and policies that will result in the
updated General Plan. The plan will go to voters in November 2016.
Town Council Regular Session Item # A.
Meeting Date:02/04/2015
Requested by: Julie Bower Submitted By:Mike Standish, Town Clerk's Office
Department:Town Clerk's Office
Information
SUBJECT:
Minutes - January 21, 2015
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
N/A
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to (approve, approve with the following changes) the January 21, 2015 minutes.
Attachments
1/21/15 Draft Minutes
1/21/15 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 1
MINUTES
ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL
REGULAR SESSION
January 21, 2015
ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE
REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 5:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Hiremath called the meeting to order at 5:01 p.m.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:Satish Hiremath, Mayor
Lou Waters, Vice Mayor
Bill Garner, Councilmember
Joe Hornat, Councilmember
Mary Snider, Councilmember
Mike Zinkin, Councilmember
ABSENT:Brendan Burns, Councilmember
EXECUTIVE SESSION - Pursuant to ARS 38-431.03.(A)(1) Personnel matters - Police
Chief’s annual performance review
MOTION:A motion was made by Vice Mayor Waters and seconded by Councilmember
Zinkin to go into Executive Session at 5:02 p.m. pursuant to A.R.S. 38-431.03(A)(1) for
the purpose of conducting the Police Chief's annual performance review.
MOTION carried, 6-0.
Mayor Hiremath said the following staff members would join Council in Executive
Session: Police Chief Danny Sharp, Town Manager Greg Caton, Town Attorney Kelly
Schwab and Town Clerk Julie Bower.
REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Hiremath called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
1/21/15 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 2
PRESENT:Satish Hiremath, Mayor
Lou Waters, Vice Mayor
Brendan Burns, Councilmember (Arrived at 6:08 p.m.)
Bill Garner, Councilmember
Joe Hornat, Councilmember
Mary Snider, Councilmember
Mike Zinkin, Councilmember
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Hiremath led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance.
UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS
Communications Administrator Misti Nowak announced the upcoming town meetings
and events.
COUNCIL REPORTS and Spotlight on Youth
Vice Mayor Waters recognized Raymond Rash, Senior at Pusch Ridge Christian
Academy, for demonstrating academic excellence, generosity and humble leadership.
Councilmember Hornat read a January 20, 2015 Town of Oro Valley Media Release
entitled, "Petitions for referendum do not comply with state law; number of signatures on
second petition effort falls short of requirement".
DEPARTMENT REPORTS
No reports were received.
ORDER OF BUSINESS
Mayor Hiremath said the agenda would stand as posted.
CALL TO AUDIENCE
Oro Valley resident George Cates thanked Shirl Lamonna and her team for all of their
hardwork obtaining referendum petition signatures and outlined possible advantages
should the referendum move forward.
Oro Valley resident Lois Berkowitz spoke in support of the referendum petition that
would refer the purchase of the El Conquistador Country Club to the voters.
Oro Valley resident Jeff Siegal spoke in support of the referendum petition.
1/21/15 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 3
Oro Valley resident Don Coleman spoke in opposition to the purchase of the El
Conquistador Country Club.
Oro Valley resident Shirl Lamonna spoke in opposition to the purchase of the El
Conquistador Country Club and urged the Council to reconsider their position on the
purchase.
Oro Valley resident Marlene Leeper spoke in support of the referendum petition and
implored Council to listen to the voices of the Oro Valley residents who opposed the
purchase of the El Conquistador Country Club.
Oro Valley resident Donald Bristow spoke in opposition to the purchase of the El
Conquistador Country Club and urged Council to hold a special session to instruct the
Town Manager to halt or modify negotiations with HSL.
Oro Valley resident Lou Gard spoke in opposition to the purchase of the El
Conquistador Country Club and urged Council to rescind their votes in order to regain
the confidence and trust of the people.
Oro Valley resident Steve Didio was disappointed the referendum petitions were
rejected and urged the Council to do whatever they could do to allow the residents to
vote on the purchase of the El Conquistador Country Club.
Oro Valley resident Roger Benasutti opposed the purchase of the El Conquistador
Country Club and requested that the matter be voted on by the residents.
Oro Valley resident Chuck Walton urged Council to reconsider their position on the
purchase of the El Conquistador Country Club and further urged Council to disclose
everything about cost projections and the text of the contract with Troon Golf L.L.C., in a
series of public meetings.
Oro Valley resident Jan Fischer was concerned that the Town would accept an un-
warranted deed for the purchase of the El Conquistador Country Club.
Oro Valley resident Chet Oldakowski spoke about collecting signatures for the
referendum and said that most residents were upset with the lack of open and
transparent government.
Oro Valley resident Leslie Platt objected to not having sufficient time and information to
consider the purchase of the El Conquistador Country Club and urged Council to
voluntarily allow the residents to vote on the purchase.
Oro Valley resident Debra Arrett spoke about the lack of legal advice she received from
the Town regarding her legal questions about the referendum challenge process.
1/21/15 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 4
Oro Valley resident Jack Evert spoke in opposition to the purchase of the El
Conquistador Country Club and proposed that the purchase of the El Conquistador
should be rescinded.
PRESENTATIONS
1.Presentation of Plaques of Appreciation to Outgoing Board and Commission
Members
Mayor Hiremath presented Plaques of Appreciation to the following outgoing Board &
Commission Members.
Historic Preservation Commission
Ed Hannon, 2009 - 2014 - Not present
Parks and Recreation Advisory Board
John Hickey, 2011 - 2014
Dana Hallin, 2013 - 2014 - Not present
Planning and Zoning Commission
John Buett, 2010 - 2014
Don Cox, 2011 - 2014
Storm Water Utility Commission
Richard (Dick) Honn, 2010 - 2014
Leo Leonhart, 2008 - 2014
Water Utility Commission
Robert Milkey, 2008 - 2014
Elizabeth Shapiro, 2006 - 2014
Richard Verlaque, 2012 - 2014
CONSENT AGENDA
Councilmember Zinkin requested to remove items (A) and (B) from the Consent Agenda
for discussion.
A.Minutes -December 17, 2014 and January 7, 2015
Councilmember Zinkin requested that the motion to Regular Agenda item #2b. in the
January 7, 2015 minutes be amended to reflect that at least one study session would be
held.
MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Zinkin and seconded by
Councilmember Garner to Amend the January 7, 2015 minutes, item #2b. as
follows:MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Zinkin and seconded by
1/21/15 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 5
Councilmember Burns to continue item #2b. to a date uncertain and hold at least one
study session.
MOTION carried, 7-0.
B.Fiscal Year 2014/15 Financial Update through November 2014
Councilmember Zinkin requested a further breakdown of the retail sales tax category.
MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Zinkin and seconded by
Councilmember Burns to approve item (B) as presented.
MOTION carried, 7-0.
REGULAR AGENDA
1.PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING AN
APPLICATION FOR A SERIES 9S (LIQUOR STORE WITH SAMPLING
PRIVILEGES) LIQUOR LICENSE FOR WALMART SUPERCENTER #3379,
LOCATED AT 2150 E. TANGERINE ROAD
Town Clerk Julie Bower presented item #1.
Mayor Hiremath opened the public hearing.
No comments were received.
Mayor Hiremath closed the public hearing.
MOTION:A motion was made by Vice Mayor Waters and seconded by Councilmember
Garner recommend approval of the issuance of a Series 9S liquor license to the Arizona
Department of Liquor Licenses and Control for Clare Abel and principals for Walmart
Supercenter #3379 located at 2150 E. Tangerine Road.
MOTION carried, 7-0.
2.RESOLUTION NO. (R)15-08, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE TOWN TO
ENTER INTO A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TOWN OF
ORO VALLEY AND THE HIGHLANDS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION (THE
HIGHLANDS INC.) FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT ON
PRIVATE STREETS
Deputy Police Chief Larry Stevens presented item #2.
Discussion ensued amongst Council and staff regarding the proposed HOA
development agreement.
1/21/15 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 6
Ellinore McDonald, President of the HOA Board of Directors for the Highlands, said the
Highlands HOA Board of Directors previously agreed to pay up to $2,000 to replace
their signs.
MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Garner and seconded by
Councilmember Hornat to approve Resolution No. (R)15-08, approving and authorizing
the Town to enter into a development agreement between the Town of Oro Valley and
the Highlands Homeowners Association (The Highlands Inc.) for Police Department
traffic enforcement on private streets with the condition that the Highlands HOA (The
Highlands Inc.) would include up to $2,000 in funding to install and/or replace signs as
needed per the Town Engineer.
MOTION carried, 7-0.
3.PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE NO. (O)15-02, REZONING OF AN
APPROXIMATELY 149-ACRE PROPERTY (KNOWN AS KAI NORTH) FROM
R1-144 (LARGE LOT RESIDENTIAL) TO C-1 (COMMERCIAL) AND R1-7
(MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) WITH LOT SIZES RANGING FROM 5,520
SQUARE FEET TO 7,200 SQUARE FEET, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF TANGERINE ROAD AND FIRST AVENUE, OV914-002
Senior Planner Michael Spaeth presented item #3 and outlined the following:
-Location Map
-Review Criteria
-Current Zoning
-General Plan Goals & Policies
-Special Area Policies
-Environmentally Sensitive Lands
-Conservation Subdivision Design
-ESL Flexible Design Options
-Public Participation
-Summary/Recommendation
Discussion ensued amongst Council and staff regarding the proposed rezoning request.
Paul Oland, representative for the WLB Group, and representing the property owners
and Meritage Homes, provided an overview of item #3.
Mayor Hiremath opened the public hearing.
The following individuals spoke in support of item #3.
Oro Valley resident Doug McKee
The following individuals spoke in opposition to item #3.
1/21/15 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 7
Oro Valley resident Alan Dankwerth
Oro Valley resident Patty Estes
The following individual spoke on item #3.
Oro Valley resident Dr. John Newport
Mayor Hiremath closed the public hearing.
Discussion ensued amongst Council, staff and Mr. Oland regarding the proposed
rezoning.
MOTION:A motion was made by Vice Mayor Waters and seconded by Councilmember
Zinkin approve Ordinance No. (O)15-02, rezoning the property totaling approximately
149 acres on the southeast corner of Tangerine Road and First Avenue (known as Kai
North) from R1-144 to C-1 and R1-7, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1, Exhibit
"B", finding that the request is consistent with the General Plan.
Councilmember Garner made a friendly amendment that staff shall notify Council of any
significant or insignificant findings as it relates to Condition #6. Vice Mayor Waters and
Councilmember Zinkin agreed to the amendment.
Attachment 1
Conditions of Approval
Planning Conditions
All Kai-Capri Special Area Policies to be included as General Notes on Final Plat
(Residential) and Final Site Plan (Commercial).
1. Indicate proposed setbacks for both residential and commercial. Commercial
setbacks are as follows:
2. Front: 20 feet
3. Side: 50 feet or 3:1 (setback to building height ratio), whichever is greater
4. Rear: 50 feet or 3:1 (setback to building height ratio), whichever is greater
5. A minimum 15’ buffer yard Type “B” is required along the eastern edge of the
proposed commercial, per Table 27-7.
6. Homes on lots 5 through 12 are limited to one-story.
7. The following Environmentally Sensitive Lands Flexible Design Options are
applicable:
8. Building Setback: Building setback reduction to no less than a five (5’) foot side
setback and no less than a ten (10’) foot front setback so long as it doesn’t result
in an on-lot driveway of less than twenty (20’) feet.
9. Landscape Buffer Yard: a reduction of no less than ten (10’) feet. Not allowed
along street frontages and adjacent to any existing and proposed residential.
1/21/15 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 8
10.Minimum lot size: A minimum lot size reduction to 5,500 square feet in
accordance with the Conservation Subdivision Design lot reduction incentive.
11.Off-street parking modification: A modification for future development in
accordance with Section 27.7.C.2 (Alternative Parking Ratio) of the Zoning Code.
12.Building Height: A building height increase from eighteen (18’) feet to twenty (20’)
feet for pitched roof residential within 200 feet of North First Avenue, or within
150 feet of Palisades Road or existing development.
13.Recreation Area Credit: Active and Passive recreation area count towards the
overall ESOS requirement.
14.Native Plant Preservation: the native plant salvage and mitigation requirements
of Section 27.6 are waived for all development within development envelopes.
15.The rezoning shall not become effective until a Cultural Resources treatment
plan is approved by the Planning and Zoning Administrator in accordance with
Section 27.10.D.3.e. If the treatment plan requires a significant change to the
Tentative Development Plan, reconsideration of the rezoning by Town Council
will be required.
Engineering Comments
1. A multi-use path will be required to be constructed along the project’s frontage
with Palisades Road. The path is to be constructed during construction of the
applicant’s project to the south of Palisades Road or with this project, whichever
is built first. This will fulfill the requirement for a sidewalk or multi-use path for
both projects along the Palisades Road frontage.
2. When the commercial area is developed, appropriate traffic mitigation measures
shall be implemented so the project drive located at the Oro Valley Retail Center
intersection operates at an acceptable level of service with the addition of the
commercial traffic.
Parks and Recreation Conditions
All trails to be dedicated as “non-vehicular permanent public recreation easements”
MOTION carried, 7-0.
Mayor Hiremath recessed the meeting at 8:20 p.m.
Mayor Hiremath reconvened the meeting at 8:31 p.m.
4.NAKOMA SKY SENIOR LIVING CAMPUS
a.RESOLUTION NO. (R)15-09, DECLARING A CERTAIN DOCUMENT KNOWN
AS THE NAKOMA SKY PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT, PROVIDED AS
EXHIBIT "A" WITHIN THE ATTACHED RESOLUTION AND FILED WITH THE
TOWN CLERK, A PUBLIC RECORD AND RESOLUTION NO. (R)15-10,
DECLARING A CERTAIN DOCUMENT KNOWN AS THE ENVIRONMENTALLY
1/21/15 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 9
SENSITIVE LANDS PLANNING MAP, PROVIDED AS EXHIBIT "A" WITHIN
THE ATTACHED RESOLUTION AND FILED WITH THE TOWN CLERK, A
PUBLIC RECORD
MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Hornat and seconded by Vice Mayor
Waters adopt Resolution No. (R)15-09, declaring a certain document known as the
Nakoma Sky Planned Area Development, provided as Exhibit "A" in the attached
Resolution and filed with the Town Clerk, a public record and further MOVE to adopt
Resolution No. (R)15-10, declaring a certain document known as the Environmentally
Sensitive Lands Planning Map, provided as Exhibit "A" in the attached Resolution and
filed with the Town Clerk, a public record.
MOTION carried, 7-0.
b.PUBLIC HEARING: NAKOMA SKY SENIOR LIVING CAMPUS ON A 79.5-
ACRE PROPERTY, LOCATED SOUTHEAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF 1ST
AVENUE AND NARANJA DRIVE
1. RESOLUTION NO. (R)15-11, ADOPTING A MINOR GENERAL PLAN TEXT
AMENDMENT TO CLARIFY THE INTENT AND APPLICABILITY OF A
GENERAL PLAN SPECIAL AREA POLICY THAT RESTRICTS RESIDENTIAL
SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT ON THE PROPERTY TO NO MORE THAN
THREE (3) UNITS PER ACRE
2. ORDINANCE NO. (O)15-03, ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE
ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE LANDS (ESL) PLANNING MAP TO MODIFY
THE RIPARIAN AREA BOUNDARIES ON A CRITICAL RESOURCE AREA ON
THE EAST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY
3. ORDINANCE NO. (O)15-04, REZONING FROM ROONEY RANCH "Z"
PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT (PAD) TO NAKOMA SKY PAD TO ENABLE
DEVELOPMENT OF A 79.5-ACRE SENIOR LIVING AND CARE CAMPUS,
INCLUDING DINING, RECREATIONAL, CULTURAL, AND RETAIL USES
Principal Planner Chad Daines presented item 4b1., 4b2. and 4b3. and outlined the
following:
-Location
-Topography and slopes
-General Plan Land Use
-Minor General Plan Amendment
-Special Area Policy
-Environmentally Sensitive Lands Map Amendment
-Revise Riparian Area (Critical Resource Area)
-Biologist Hired to Re-evaluate
-Proposed Rezoning
1/21/15 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 10
-Neighborhood Participation
-Planning and Zoning Commission - Primary Issues
-Building Height
-Building Design and Theming
-Traffic Access
-Primary Issues
-Recommendation
Discussion ensued amongst Council and staff regarding item #4.
Lisa Israel, President and CEO of La Posada, presented item #4.
Rob Longaker, representative for the WLB Group, spoke on item #4.
Ver Swaback, representative for Swaback Partners, spoke on the proposed architecture
and site plan.
Mayor Hiremath opened the public hearing.
The following individuals spoke in support of item #4.
Oro Valley resident Judy Schumann
Oro Valley resident Robert Schumann
Chuck Wunder, Fire Chief for the Green Valley Fire District
Dave Perry, President and CEO of the Greater Oro Valley Chamber of Commerce and
Oro Valley resident
Mayor Hiremath closed the public hearing.
Discussion continued with Council, staff and the applicant regarding the proposed
Nakoma Sky senior living campus.
MOTION:A motion was made by Vice Mayor Waters and seconded by Councilmember
Hornat adopt Resolution No. (R)15-11, approving the Minor General Plan Amendment
requested under case OV1114-005.
MOTION carried, 4-3 with Councilmember Burns, Councilmember Garner, and
Councilmember Zinkin opposed.
MOTION:A motion was made by Vice Mayor Waters and seconded by Councilmember
Hornat adopt Ordinance No. (O)15-03, approving the ESL zoning map amendment
requested under case OV914-008.
MOTION carried, 4-3 with Councilmember Burns, Councilmember Garner, and
Councilmember Zinkin opposed.
1/21/15 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 11
MOTION:A motion was made by Vice Mayor Waters and seconded by Mayor Hiremath
adopt Ordinance No. (O)15-04, rezoning the subject property to Nakoma Sky Planned
Area Development under case OV914-007, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1.
Attachment 1
Conditions of Approval
Nakoma Sky Rezoning
Planning
1. The building height of the apartment building in the campus core (Development
Area C) shall include reduced building height elements on the ends of the
building as depicted in Appendices A and D within the PAD.
2. The visual impact of the bulk and mass of the apartment building in the campus
core (Development Area C) shall be mitigated through the use of the following:
a. Varied roof and wall planes, with a heightened emphasis on the roofline of
the southern wing of the building.
b. Differing building and roof materials and textures as shown in Appendix B.
c. Landscaping at the base of buildings and terraces on multiple levels of the
building.
d. Low reflectivity windows.
e. Several muted earth tone colors.
f. Architectural features at the corners of the building to soften the building
façade as depicted on Appendix A.
g. Other measures approved by the Conceptual Design Review Board and
Town Council which mitigate the visual impact of the building.
The extent of mitigation shall be determined by the Conceptual Design Review Board
and Town Council in conjunction with the Conceptual Design application.
3. The architectural character and theming of the project will be equal to or better
than the representative imagery shown in Appendices A, B, and C, as
determined by the Conceptual Design Review Board and Town Council.
4. Consistent roof plane variation, wall plane articulation and architectural treatment
is required on all building elevations of every building within the PAD boundary
as provided in Section 2.1.D. of Addendum A Design Standards.
5. Vehicular parking required for the project beyond that which is shown on Exhibit
R: Tentative Development Plan or Exhibit DD: Optional Surface Parking
Locations shall be beneath the apartment building (either underground or under
the building).
6. The recreational facilities and amenities contained within the community park and
gardens will be open to the public and the theater, classrooms and other indoor
facilities, as appropriate, will be made available for limited public use. A Public
Access Agreement shall be approved the Town prior to the zoning becoming
effective.
1/21/15 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 12
7. The last paragraph in Section II-A.7 Tentative Development Plan, shall be
amended to read as follows: “Exhibit R Tentative Development Plan is the hereby
adopted as the approved tentative design for the project. Amendments to the
Tentative Development Plan shall be subject to Section 22.3.D.2 of the Oro
Valley Zoning Code Revised.”
8. The use of water features for ornamental purposes in the PAD is prohibited.
9. This development shall comply with the requirements of Section 26.5.B, Section
26.5.C and Section 26.5.D of the Oro Valley Zoning Code. The term dwelling unit
in Section 26.5.C. shall include beds, bedrooms and living units for the purpose
of calculating the amount of recreational area. All park and recreation area plans
shall be reviewed and approved by the Oro Valley Parks and Recreation
Advisory Board (PRAB).
10.Pocket parks/informal gathering spaces will be required in each housing node
(Development Areas B, C, D, E and H). A shaded seating area including a
ramada and associated amenities shall be provided in each park area.
11.A sufficient quantity of trees shall be provided along the shared use path
alignments to create a continuous length of canopy that creates the opportunity
for shade.
12.All plant materials shall be selected from the Oro Valley Native Plant List (Zoning
Code Addendum C). Section II-A.9 shall be amended to reflect this condition
13.All shared use paths shall be constructed in conformance with Pima County
Regional Trail System Master Plan standards
14.A shared use path shall be constructed on the top of any constructed bank
protection along the Canyon Del Oro Wash. In addition, a shaded seating area
and pedestrian/bicycle connection shall be provided at 500-foot intervals along
the path.
15.Delete independent living uses in the Table of Permitted Uses for commercial,
medical and service development areas (Areas A, F, and G). These uses
include:
Apartment
Condominium
Duplex/Multiple Dwelling
Multiple Dwelling Unit
Residential Dwelling (Attached or Detached)
Townhouse for senior living
Engineering
1. If bank protection is constructed along the Canyon Del Oro Wash, a multi-use
path that meets the requirements of the Town of Oro Valley and Pima County
Regional Trail System Master Plan standards shall be provided. In addition, a 50’
wide area shall be reserved along the top of the bank protection for the purpose
of a future linear park.
Oro Valley Water Utility
1/21/15 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 13
1. A 100 foot by 100 foot site shall be dedicated to the Water Utility for a future well
in a location approved by the Water Utility Director.
General
The PAD document shall be amended to incorporate all conditions established within
Attachment A. References, notations and imagery inconsistent with these conditions
shall be deleted from the PAD document.
MOTION carried, 4-3 with Councilmember Burns, Councilmember Garner, and
Councilmember Zinkin opposed.
5.DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION TO INITIATE AN AMENDMENT TO
THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED (OVZCR) RELATING TO
INCREASED REGULATIONS FOR SIGN ILLUMINATION
MOTION:A motion was made by Mayor Hiremath and seconded by Councilmember
Snider to direct staff to look into the current sign illumination regulations and compare
them to the changes that other municipalities have made and provide the information to
Council through a Council Report.
MOTION carried, 7-0.
6.DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE DIRECTION TO STAFF REGARDING THE
IMPLEMENTATION OF ORDINANCE (O)14-17 AMENDING THE TAX CODE OF
THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY TO INCREASE THE LOCAL TRANSACTION
PRIVILEGE TAX (TPT) RATE FROM 2% TO 2.5% IN VARIOUS CATEGORIES
MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Garner and seconded by
Councilmember Zinkin to continue item #6 to the first Council meeting in February.
MOTION carried, 7-0.
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Councilmember Zinkin directed staff not to place two rezoning items on any one
agenda.
Councilmember Burns requested a future agenda item to review sign districts in Oro
Valley, seconded by Councilmember Garner.
CALL TO AUDIENCE
No comments were received.
ADJOURNMENT
1/21/15 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 14
MOTION:A motion was made by Vice Mayor Waters and seconded by Councilmember
Garner to adjourn the meeting at 10:13 p.m.
MOTION carried, 7-0.
Prepared by:
________________________
Michael Standish, CMC
Deputy Town Clerk
I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of
the regular session of the Town of Oro Valley Council of Oro Valley, Arizona held on the
21st day of January, 2015. I further certify that the meeting was duly called and held
and that a quorum was present.
Dated this ____ day of _______________________, 2015.
____________________________
Julie K. Bower, MMC
Town Clerk
Town Council Regular Session Item # B.
Meeting Date:02/04/2015
Requested by: Daniel G. Sharp Submitted By:Colleen Muhr, Police Department
Department:Police Department
Information
SUBJECT:
Resolution No. (R)15-12, authorizing and approving Amendment #1 to the Intergovernmental Agreement
(IGA) between Pima County and the Town of Oro Valley for the Pima County Wireless Integrated
Network (PCWIN) subscriber services
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
On April 16, 2014, Council approved Resolution No. (R)14-23, authorizing and approving an IGA
between Pima County and the Town of Oro Valley for the PCWIN Subscriber Services in order to provide
repair and maintenance services to PCWIN radios.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
Amendment #1 provides for the continuance of necessary repair and maintenance for the 233 radios
utilized by the Oro Valley Police Department.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Appropriate budget capacity of $8,495.34 exists for this maintenance item in the current fiscal year
budget, and the capacity of $8,758.47 will be included in the appropriate category in the requested
budget for FY 2015/2016.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to (adopt or deny) Resolution No. (R)15-12, authorizing and approving Amendment #1 to the
Intergovernmental Agreement between Pima County and the Town of Oro Valley for the Pima County
Wireless Integrated Network subscriber services.
Attachments
(R)15-12 Amendment to PCWIN IGA
IGA Extension for PCWIN
C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 6\@BCL@5C0DA133\@BCL@5C0DA133.doc Town of Oro Valley Attorney’s Office/cs/100812
RESOLUTION NO. (R)15-12
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING AND
APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN PIMA
COUNTY AND THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY FOR THE
PIMA COUNTY WIRELESS INTEGRATED NETWORK
(PCWIN)
WHEREAS, pursuant to A.R.S. § 11-952, the Town is authorized to enter into or renew
agreements for joint and cooperative action with other public agencies; and
WHEREAS, the Town is authorized to establish and maintain the Oro Valley Police Department,
pursuant to A.R.S. § 9-240 (B)(12); and
WHEREAS, the Town desires to amend the Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with Pima
County to extend the IGA term for a period of one year to allow Pima county to continue to provide
ITD Subscriber Services to the Town in connection with the Town’s participating in PCWIN; and
WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the Town to amend the IGA, attached hereto as Exhibit “A”
and incorporated herein by this reference, to provide for the health, safety and welfare of the
residents in the Town of Oro Valley.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of
Oro Valley, Arizona, that:
1. The amendment to the Intergovernmental Agreement between the Town of Oro Valley
and Pima County, attached hereto as Exhibit “A”, for ITD Subscriber Services in
connection with the Pima County Wireless Integrated Network is hereby authorized and
approved.
2. The Chief of Police and any other administrative officials are hereby authorized to take
such steps as necessary to execute and implement the terms of the Agreement.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona,
this 4th day of February, 2015.
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
_______________________________
Dr. Satish I. Hiremath, Mayor
C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 6\@BCL@5C0DA133\@BCL@5C0DA133.doc Town of Oro Valley Attorney’s Office/cs/100812
ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie K. Bower, Town Clerk Tobin Sidles, Legal Services Director
Date: Date:
C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 6\@BCL@5C0DA133\@BCL@5C0DA133.doc Town of Oro Valley Attorney’s Office/cs/100812
EXHIBIT “A”
PIMA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION
TECHNOLOGY
PROJECT: IGA for Pima County ITO Subscriber Services
AGENCY: Oro Valley Police Department
CONTRACT NO.: CTN-IT-15000000000000000005
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT
AMENDMENT NO.: One (#01)
ORIG. CONTRACT TERM: 03/15/2014 -03/14/2015
TERMINATION DATE PRIOR AMENDMENT: NIA
TERMINATION THIS AMENDMENT: 03/14/2016
ORIG. CONTRACT AMOUNT:
PRIOR AMENDMENTS:
AMOUNT THIS AMENDMENT:
REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT:
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT AMENDMENT
$ 8,495 .34
NIA
$ 8 ,758.47
$17 ,253 .81
WHEREAS , COUNTY and AG ENCY entered into an Intergovernmental Agreement ("IGA") for ITO Subscriber
Services in connect ion wi th the Pima County Wireless Integrated Network ("PCWIN") project as referenced above ;
and
WHEREAS , AGENCY and COUNTY, pursuant to Section 4 -Term and Termination, have agreed to extend the
IGA term for a period of one year to allow COUNTY to continue to provide ITO Subscriber Services to AGENCY in
connection with AGENCY 's participation in PCWIN; and
WHEREAS , AGENCY and COUNTY have agreed to increase the IGA payment amount to allow payment to
COUNTY for the continued provision of ITO Subscriber Services to AG ENC Y during the extended term of the IGA.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows :
CHANGE: SECTION 4 -TERM AND TERMINATION :
From : .. through March 14 ,2015 ..
To .. thro ug h March 14 ,2016 ..
ADD Exhibi t B-1
The effective date of this Amendment shall be upon execution by the Pima County Board of Supervisors .
(REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTION ALLY LEFT BLANK)
Page 1 of 4 Pima County ITO Subscriber Services
IGA CTN-IT-15*0005 , Amendment #1
All other provisions of the IGA not specifically changed by this Amendment shall remain in effect and be binding
upon the parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the parties have affi xed their signatures to this Amendment on the dates written below .
APPROVED:
Chair, Board of Supervisors
Date
ATTEST
Clerk of Board
Date
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT
Jesse Rodriguez , Chief Information Officer
Date
AGENCY:
Signature
Name and Title (Please Print)
Date
Page 2 of 4 Pima County lTD Subscriber Services
IGA CTN-IT-15*0005 , Amendment #1
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT AMENDMENT DETERMINATION
The foregoing Amendment to the Intergovernmental Agreement between Pima County and
Oro Valley Police Department has been reviewed pursuant to A.R.S. § 11-952 et seq. by
the undersigned, who have determined that it is in proper form and is within the powers and
authority granted under the laws of the State of Arizona to those Parties to the
Intergovernmental Amendment represented by the undersigned.
PIMA COUNTY:
Date
AGENCY NAME: Oro Valley Police Department
Print Name, Title
Signature
Date
Page 3 of 4 Pima County ITO Subscriber Services
IGA CTN-IT -15'0005 , Amendment #1
Agency Name
County or COT Maintenance
Monthy I T&M I Both
# of Mobiles
# of Portables
# of Control Statio ns
# of DVRSs
Totals
Monthly
Mobi les
Portables
Control Stations
DVRs
(Totals
T&M
Mobi les
Portables
Contro l Stations
DVRs
rrotals
T&M Estimated Annual Service Cost*
'Grand Totll
Totals
105
126
2
0
233
0
0
0
0
0
105
126
2
0
233
EXHIBIT B -1
03/15/2015-03/14/2016
Oro Valley Po li ce Dept.
Cou n ty
T&M
$8 Monthly Fee ($96 Ann ual )
$
$
$
$
$ -
$20 Base Ann ual Fee
$ 2,100.00
$ 2,520.00
$ 40.00
$ -
$ 4,660.00
$ 4,098.47
233 1$ 8,758.47'
*10% aftotal ra dios needing 1 hour repair and an average of battery, belt clip and
antenna replacement ($135.90 for parts and $40 fo r one hour of lab or = $175.9 0).
Page 4 of 4 Pima Coun ty ITO Subscriber Services
IGA CTN -IT -15*0005 , Amendment #1
Town Council Regular Session Item # C.
Meeting Date:02/04/2015
Requested by: Mayor Hiremath Submitted By:Julie Bower, Town Clerk's Office
Department:Town Clerk's Office
Information
SUBJECT:
Reappointment of the representative to the Regional Transportation Authority's (RTA) Citizens
Accountability for Regional Transportation (CART) Committee
RECOMMENDATION:
Mayor Hiremath recommends that Tom Bush be reappointed to the Citizens Accountability for Regional
Transportation Committee for another 4-year term.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Each member jurisdiction has one citizen representative on the RTA CART Committee. Mr. Bush has
been a resident of Oro Valley for 21 years and was first appointed to the committee in March 2009.
Attached is his board and commission application.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
The CART Committee provides oversight for the implementation of the 20-year RTA plan and reviews the
RTA's annual report. CART meets 3 to 4 times per year as needed.
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to reappoint Tom Bush to the RTA Citizens Accountability for Regional Transportation
Committee for another 4-year term expiring December 31, 2018.
Attachments
B&C Application
, " ....
ORO VALLEY VOLUNTEER APPOINTMENT APPLICATION
Dear Oro Valley Citizen: We appreciate your interest in the Town of Oro Valley. This informational form, when completed, will allow us to quickly
process your application. A list describing the Town's Boards and Commissions is attached for your reference. Information reflecting the procedures
surrounding the appointment process to Boards is also attached. Your application will re main on file for two years from dat e of receipt. Your supplying
this data will greatly assist us in understanding how we can best use your talents and experience. We thank you kindly for volunteering to serve the Tawil .
PleAse Note: No volunteer shall serve 011 more than one standing Board at any time and must have resided in the Town for 1 yeal". Please return
to:
Town Clerk's Office, 11,000 North La Canada Drive, Oro Valley, AZ 85737
Name [Last Fi"t Middle]:
Address [Street City State Z ip]:
BUSH, THOMAS HAROLD
r::=====~==::::! ORO VALLEY, AZ 85737
Home Phone: -~---' Cell Phone: "--_-J Business Phone: None Email:
Number of Years in Oro Valley: 21 years a resident
Signature ~%.Bt.£; Date January 20, 20 IS
Pl eas e indicate the board or co mmi ss ion you wish to join: RT A CART as representing Oro Valley
Please list your volunteer services in Oro Valley and with other organizations including any boards or commissions on which you have
served: (board/commi ssion, civic, educational, cultural, social, etc.):
• Coyote Run Task Force which created the original OV transportation service,
• 2020 OV General Plan Development Committee,
• Disability rep resentative to the initial Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) Citizens Committee.
• Founding Member, Board of Directors, Linkages-Tucson.
• Member of Citizens Planning Committee for the RTA Grant Road Project -the largest RTA project.
• RTA CART for the past four years representing Oro Valley.
• Performed an evaluation of the emergency exit procedures for the Modern Streetcar at the request of its
management.
How does your previous volunteer service prepare you for the board or commission ap pointment for which you have applied? Please
describe an issue considered at a meeting of the Board or Commission for which you are applying:
• NUltured ability to listen and understand competing points of view, discern the facts, and to decide
accordingly.
• Reconciled many issues between differing transportation priorities to produce a plan that achieved voter
approval.
• Issues: Indirect left-turn technique; contractor concerns causing significant delays for the La Caf\ada
and Magee projects; among others.
Have you attended the Citizens Planning Institute? YES (unsure of year, but on or about 2000)
Briefly describe your educational/vocational background:
• Graduated: Rutgers University, N ew Brunswick, NJ., Industrial Engineer, June 1964 .
• 1964 to 1993: Executive manager within New Jersey state government responsible for management
systems development, facilities planning, construction and lease-purchase, statewide director of
facilities design, construction and maintenance , responsible for the implementation of the Americans
with Disabilities Act (ADA) within N.J. state government and ADA advisory consultant to county and
local governments. (Retired and moved to Oro Valley with my wife and family.)
• 1994 to 2004: Planned, developed and managed the national Muscular Dystrophy Association (MDA)
website and assisted the MDA President and CEO in various administrative activities.
• 2004: Retired,
• Since retirement have participated (as facilitator, advisor and attendee) in several non-credit history, US
Constitution, and religion classes, 2/23/11
Town Council Regular Session Item # D.
Meeting Date:02/04/2015
Requested by: Paul Keesler
Submitted By:Paul Keesler, Development Infrastructure Services
Department:Development Infrastructure Services
Information
SUBJECT:
Approval to amend the adopted FY 2014/15 budget allocation for the Aquatic Center Parking Expansion
Project in the General Government Capital Improvement Project (CIP) Fund
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval to adjust the budget.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
In the approved FY 2014/15 Town of Oro Valley budget, particularly the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)
Fund section, Council approved the design and construction of an additional parking lot to serve James
D. Kriegh Park and the Aquatic Center (please see attached listing of FY 2014/15 CIP projects). The
approved budget is presently set at $184,000 for the design and construction of 100 paved parking
spaces to the east of the park along the Egleston Drive right-of-way (ROW), with ingress/egress provided
to Calle Concordia.
Now that the design is complete and the installing contractor secured, the Town has the opportunity to
double the number of parking spaces to a total of 200. This expansion of the project will cost an additional
$100,000; therefore, staff is requesting approval to amend the budget from $184,000 to $284,000.
The additional funding for this project would be re-allocated from the Municipal Operations Center (MOC)
Fueling Facility project currently budgeted at $80,000 and projected savings of $20,000 from the
Electronic Document Management System (EDMS) project currently budgeted at $112,000.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
The objective of this CIP item is to provide additional parking for JDK Park and the Aquatic Center. The
original design establishing the CIP budget allowed for 100 spaces to be linearly attached to a new drive
within the existing Egleston Drive right-of-way, just east of the Aquatic Center.
Now that the design is complete, the site has the capacity to add more parking while maintaining available
space for future Aquatic Center expansion (see Attachment #1). In total, 100 additional spaces may be
added for an additional $100,000, which is possible due to the contractor already being mobilized for the
original project. There is an economy of cost scale associated with completing all of the parking at once,
and if a contractor were to come back later as a separate project, it will be more expensive. The total
number of additional spaces added would be 200 should Council choose to adjust the budget, rather than
just the 100 spaces currently budgeted.
The additional cost to build the second set of 100 spaces can be cost neutral to the adopted FY 2014/15
budget by not funding the MOC Fueling Facility, currently budgeted at $80,000, as well as using
budget by not funding the MOC Fueling Facility, currently budgeted at $80,000, as well as using
expected savings of $20,000 from the EDMS project that is anticipated to come in under budget. The
MOC Fueling Station can be delayed and reconsidered at a later date if needed.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The fiscal impact to the current Council-approved budget is neutral, with the additional funding to be
re-allocated from the MOC Fueling Facility project ($80,000) and anticipated savings ($20,000) from the
EDMS project that is expected to come in under budget.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to amend the approved FY 2014/15 budget allocation for the Aquatic Center Parking Expansion
project in the General Government Capital Improvement Project (CIP) Fund from $184,000 to $284,000
by reallocating $80,000 in funding from the MOC Fueling Facility project and $20,000 in savings from the
EDMS project.
Attachments
Attachment 1 - Parking Layout
Gen Govt CIP Fund FY 14-15
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
AQUATIC CENTER
CONCEPT PARKING PLAN
VERT.
HORZ.SHEETSCALES OF
DA
T
E
PR
O
J
.
E
N
G
R
.
CH
E
C
K
E
D
DR
A
W
N
DE
S
I
G
N
E
D
DA
T
E
DI
V
/
S
E
C
T
.
E
N
G
R
.
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
NO
.
TO
W
N
O
F
O
R
O
V
A
L
L
E
Y
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
A
N
D
I
N
F
R
A
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
S
11
0
0
0
N
.
L
a
C
a
n
a
d
a
D
r
.
Or
o
V
a
l
l
e
y
,
A
z
.
8
5
7
3
7
52
0
-
2
2
9
-
4
8
0
0
SITE PLAN
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
AQUATIC CENTER
CONCEPT PARKING PLAN
90
12
0
15
0
18
0
21
0
24
0
27
0
30
0
33
0
0
30
60
35
0
32
0
29
0
25
0
23
0
22
0
20
0
19
0
17
0
16
0
14
0
80
70
50
34
0
4O
20
10
31
0
28
0
26
0
10
0
13
0
11
0
E
So
u
t
h
No
r
t
h
W
TO
W
N
O
F
O
R
O
V
A
L
L
E
Y
ST
E
A
M
P
U
M
P
R
A
N
C
H
PA
R
K
I
N
G
/
C
I
R
C
U
L
A
T
I
O
N
P
L
A
N
1 1
35
1
5
4
PA
U
L
B
E
N
N
E
T
T
KE
E
S
L
E
R
EX
P
.
:
0
9
/
3
0
/
1
5
PRE
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
Additional Space for Future Aquatic Center Expansion
o 25 50 100 150 =S~C~AL~E:==':1~" ~50~' ~~:~~~~:~;;;;.i
Projects by Fund
Ta bl e 2 below ide ntifie s the Ge nera l Gove rnm e nt CIP Fund proj ects for Fis cal Year s 2015 -20 29 :
Tabl e 2
General Government CIP Fund
Fiscal Year
Project Name 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 -20/21 21122 -24/25 25/26 -28/29
MOC Fue ling Faci li ty $ 80,000 $ $ $ $ $
MOC Pa rking Expansion and Sec urity Imp rovements 50,000 125,000
The District Signs and Fl ags 100 ,000 100,000
Aquatic Center Parking Expa nsion 184 ,000
Upgrade CarteGraph to Enterprise License 40 ,000
Replace Permitting /Land Mgmt So ftwa re -ROL LOVER 240 ,000
Replacement Phone System -ROL LOVER 200 ,000 300 ,000
TO'M1 Back ups 60,000 200 ,000
Security Upgrades (Cameras) -ROLLOVER 50 ,000
Server Room Expa nsion 150,000
Server Operating System Upgrade 50 ,000 60 ,000 70,000
Network Storage Upgrade 50 ,000 60 ,000 72,000
Database Li censing 50 ,000 SO ,OOO 85,000
Upgrade Desktop Ope rati ng Syste m 150,000 200,000
Exchange Se rver Replacement 70,000 80,000 80,000
Virtua l Se rve r Host Sys tem Re pl ace ment 60,000 60,000 60,000
Re pl ace Netwo rk Infr astruc tur e Ha rd'N3r e 200,000
Ne w CourVP rosec ution Buildin g 3,500,000
Courtroom Remodel and Bench RedeSig n 10,000 75 ,OUD
Naranja Park Master Plan Update -ROLLOVER 40 ,000
New Restroom at Naranja Pa rk 250 ,000
Two Additional Soccer Fields at Naranja Park 400,000
New Playground at Naranja Park 275,000 120 ,000
Additions/Upgrades to Playground at Riverf ron t Park 57 ,000 200 ,000
Renovate Upper Soccer Field at Riverfront Pa rk 200 ,000
Convert Lo......er Soccer Field to Softball at Rive rf ront Park 200,000
Resurface Parking Lo t at Riverfront Park 90 ,000
Upgrade Playground Equipment at JDK Pa rk 200,000
New Ramada at JDK Park 300 ,000
Expand and Upgrade Green Field at J OK Pa rk 150,000
Resurface Parking Lo ts at JDK Park 60,000
Honeybee Canyon Park Upgrades 150,000
Improvemen ts at Steam Pump Ra nch (S PR) 125,000
Aqua ti c Center Upgrades 57 ,000
Proctor/Leiber House Renova tion at SPR 280,000 280,000
TO'Ml Hall Pa rking Lot Landscaping 75 ,000
rv10bile Stage 150 ,000
PropertyliD and Southern Substation Building 200 ,000 2,500 ,000
New Substation and Training Facility at MOC 3 ,170,000
Substation and Training Facility (Ar royo Grande) 3,170,000
Replace Command Post 300 ,000
Expand Communications Infrastruc ture 200,000
Records Management Upgrade 75 ,000
Electronic Document Management System (EDMS ) 112 ,000
Children's Museum Oro Valley Start Up Costs 200 ,000
TEP Undergounding Project -ROLLOVER 970 ,000
Total s S 2,900 ,000 S 3,575 ,000 S 1,080,000 S 2,615 ,000 S 7,915 ,000 S 3,537 ,000
2014-2015 Annual Budget Capital Improvement Program
Town Council Regular Session Item # 1.
Meeting Date:02/04/2015
Requested by: Julie Bower Submitted By:Mike Standish, Town Clerk's Office
Department:Town Clerk's Office
Information
SUBJECT:
PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING AN APPLICATION FOR A
SERIES 14 (PRIVATE CLUB) LIQUOR LICENSE FOR ORO VALLEY COUNTRY CLUB LOCATED AT
300 W. GREENOCK DRIVE
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of this liquor license to the Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and
Control for the following reasons:
1. No protests to this license have been received.
2. The necessary background investigation was conducted by the Police Department.
3. The Police Department has no objections to the approval of the Series 14 Liquor License.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application for an interim permit and new Series 14 (Private Club) Liquor License has been submitted
by Owner/Agent Mark Oswald for Oro Valley Country Club located at 300 W. Greenock Drive.
Mr. Oswald has submitted all necessary paperwork to the Town of Oro Valley and the Arizona
Department of Liquor Licenses and Control, and has paid all related fees associated with applying for the
liquor license ($500 Application Processing Fee).
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
This non-transferable, on-sale retail privileges liquor license allows the holder of a club license to sell and
serve all types of spirituous liquor for consumption only on the premises owned, leased or occupied by
the club, and only to bona fide members of the club and their bona fide guests. A "club" is defined in the
statutes as including veterans and fraternal organizations and their building associations, golf, social and
airline clubs.
In accordance with Section 4-201 of the Arizona Revised Statutes, the application was posted for 20
days on the premises of the applicant's property, ending January 2, 2015. No protests were received
during this time period.
Police Chief Daniel Sharp completed a standard background check on Oro Valley Country Club and
Owner/Agent Mark Oswald. Chief Sharp has no objection to the approval of the Series 14 (Private Club)
License.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Per Ordinance No. (O)11-16, the Town of Oro Valley charges a $500 liquor license application
processing fee to cover the costs incurred by the Town to process the application.
Per Section 8-2-6 Schedule of the Oro Valley Town Code, persons licensed by the State of Arizona to
deal in spirituous liquor within the Town shall pay an annual license fee of $80.00 to the Town.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to (recommend or deny) approval of the issuance of a Series 14 Liquor License to the Arizona
Department of Liquor Licenses and Control for Mark Oswald and principals for Oro Valley Country
Club located at 300 W. Greenock Drive.
Attachments
Oro Valley Country Club Series 14 Liquor License
TO: Mike Standi sh
DANIEL G . SHARP
C H I EF OF PO LI CE
FROM: ~ paniel G. S harp
DATE : 22 December 20 14
RE: Background In vest igat ion, Applicat io n for Liquor Licen se
Oro Valley Co untr y C lub
300 W. Greenock Dr.
On 22 Dece mber 2014 , th e Oro Va ll ey Police Department completed th e s tandard
backgrou nd check on Oro Valley Country C lub Age nt Mark C. Oswald. Thi s background
check was for two liquor li censes , a Se ri es 14 Private Club , and a Series 6 liquor sa les.
The Oro Valley P o li ce D epartmen t has no objection for the issuance of a liqu or lic ense to
th e O ro Valley Country C lu b at 300 W. G ree n ock D r.
11000 N. La Cali ada Drive • Oro Valley, AZ 85737
Phone 520-229-4900 • Fax 520-229-4979 • www.ovpd.org
Arizona Department of Liquor licenses and Control '1 4 DEC "
800 West Washington, 5th Floor
Phoenix, Ariz6na 85007
[lEC 9'14p!1 1:24 TO V w»;w.azliquor.gov -',
602-542-5141
APPLICATION FOR LIQUOR LICENSE
TYPE OR PRINT WITH BLACK INK
Notice: Effective Nov. 1, 1997, All Owners: Agents, Partners. Stockholders. Officers ':.~r. Managers actively involved -in the day to day operations of
the business must attend a Department approved liquor law training course or provide proof of attendance within the last five years. See p:lge 5 of
the Liquor Licensing requirements. . ,
SECTION 1 This application is for a:
o MORE THAN ONE LICENSE
~SECTION 2 Type of ownership:
181 INTERIM PERMIT Complete Section 5
181 NEW LICENSE Complete Sections 2, 3, 4, 13, 14, 15,16 o PERSON TRANSFER (Bars & Liquor StoresONL Y)
Complete Sections 2, 3, 4, 11, 13, 15, 16 o LOCATION TRANSFER (Bars anaLI!1uor Stores ONLY)
Complete Sections 2, 3, 4,12, 13, 15, 16 o PROBATEIWILLASSIGNMENT/DIVORCE DECREE
Complete Sections 2, 3, 4,9, 13, 16 (fee not required) o GOVERNMENT Complete Sections 2, 3,4, 10, 13, 15,16
o JTW~R.O ,S . Complete Section 6 o INDIVIDUAL Complete Section 6
o PARTNERSHIP Complete Section 6 o CORPORATION Complete Section 7
~ LIMITED LIABILITY CO, Complete Section 7
o CLUB Complete Section 8 o GOVERNMENT Complete Section 10 o TRUST Complete Section 6 o OTHER (Explain) _________ _
----------~
SE CTI ON 3 Type of license and fees LICENSE #(s): _' ------'-___ ----;:===~=\'=L\==l =O~3=O=d-=q==:::::;-
1, Type of License(s): Series 14 -Pri vate Club I __________________ Dcr~ment Use Only
2, Total fees attached $ ?-<B b ~,
AP PLICA TI 0 N FEE AND IN TE RI M PERMIT FEES (IF A P PL~/';;:CA-;;B-;:;-L;=E~):=A;;-;R:O;E;::-N=Oc:;T:-;:R""E:;;:F;;-U;;-N;-;:D:-;;Ac;:BO-;L--::E:;-. --'
The fees allowed under A.R.S 44-6852 will be charged for all dishonored checks. ----------------------
SECTION 4 Applicant
0Mr Oswald Mark r IOd-)Cj y~ 1, Owner/Agent's Name: 0 Ms, ___ ' ______________________ C_la--'y _____ _
(Inse rt one name ONLY to appear on license) Last Firs t Middle
2. CorpJPartnership/LLC: OVCC, LLC\?\O")") ")80 --~(~Ex~a~cl~~~as~i~la~p~pe~a ~~~on~A~rt~ic~le~s ~of~ln~c~,o~r~Art~ic~le~s ~of~O~~~.)~--------------------~~~~~
3, Business Name: Oro Valley Country Club
(Exactly as it appears on the exterior of premises)
4, Principal Street Lo cat ion 300 W. Gre eno ck Dr, Oro Valley Pima 85737
(Do no l use PO Box Numb er) S-aO -:3?,i-{ giy--'O'S3 Cou nl y Zip
5, Business Phone: 520-297-1121 Daytime Phone:~~ Email:laine.schroeder@clubcorp.com
6 , Is the business localed within th e incorporated limits of the above city or town? ~YES ONO
7, Mailing Address: 3030 LB) Free way Su ite 600 Dallas, Texas 75234
City Slate
8, Price paid for license only bar, beer and wine, or liquor store: Type N/A
Zip
Type ___ $ _______ _
DEPARTMENT USE ONLY
Fees it IWSQ
Appl ication
~lffi@}
Interim Permit Site Inspect ion
'\1, OO.~
Finger Prints $') ee. . t;:D
TOTAL OF ALL FEES
Is A ri zo na Statement of C itizen ship & Alien Status For State Benefits co mplete? ~YES o NO
Accepted by: W Date \ '). (''5 1 1L.j Lic. # -----,IL-Y-'-" I-'<O'--'3D.l""--'d-«-q--'--__ _
1rT12013 *Disabled individuals requiring special accommodation, please call (602) 542-9027.
1
License Type: Series 14 Private Club
This non-transferable, on-sale retail privileges liquor license allows the holder of a club
license to sell and serve all types of spirituous liquor for consumption only on the
premises owned, leased or occupied by the club, and only to bona fide members of the
club and their bona fide guests. A "club" is defined in the statutes as including veterans
and fratemal organizations and their building associations, golf, social and airline clubs.
Town Council Regular Session Item # 2.
Meeting Date:02/04/2015
Requested by: Julie Bower Submitted By:Mike Standish, Town Clerk's Office
Department:Town Clerk's Office
Information
SUBJECT:
PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING AN APPLICATION FOR A
SERIES 6 (BAR) LIQUOR LICENSE FOR ORO VALLEY COUNTRY CLUB LOCATED AT 300 W.
GREENOCK DRIVE
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of this liquor license to the Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and
Control for the following reasons:
1. No protests to this license have been received.
2. The necessary background investigation was conducted by the Police Department.
3. The Police Department has no objection to the approval of the Series 6 Liquor License.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application for a person and location transfer of an existing Series 6 (Bar) Liquor License has been
submitted by Owner/Agent Mark Oswald for Oro Valley Country Club located at 300 W. Greenock Drive.
Ms. Oswald has submitted all necessary paperwork to the Town of Oro Valley and the Arizona
Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and has paid all related fees associated with applying for the
liquor license ($500 Application Processing Fee).
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
The bar (series 6) liquor license is a "quota" license available only through the Liquor License Lottery or
for purchase on the open market. Once issued, this liquor license is transferable from person to person
and/or location to location within the same county and allows the holder both on- & off-sale retail
privileges. This license allows a bar retailer to sell and serve all types of spirituous liquors, primarily by
individual portions, to be consumed on the premises and in the original container for consumption on or
off the premises. A retailer with off-sale ("To Go") privileges may deliver spirituous liquor off of the
licensed premises in connection with a retail sale. A.R.S. 4-206.01.F. states that after January 1, 2011,
the off-sale privileges associated with a bar license shall be limited to no more than 30% of the total
annual sales receipts of liquor by the licensee at that location. Payment must be made no later than the
time of delivery. Off-sale ("To Go") package sales of spirituous liquor can be made on the bar premises
as long as the area of off-sale operation does not utilize a separate entrance and exit from the ones
provided for the bar. A hotel or motel with a Series 06 license may sell spirituous liquor in sealed
containers in individual portions to its registered guests at any time by means of a minibar located in the
guest rooms of registered guests. The registered guest must be at least twenty-one (21) years of age.
Access to the minibar is by a key or magnetic card device and not furnished to a guest between the
hours of 2:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. Internet sale of liquor is not permitted in the state of Arizona. Liquor
must be delivered to an Arizona liquor-licensed wholesaler, then an Arizona liquor-licensed retailer prior
to delivery to the consumer.
to delivery to the consumer.
In accordance with Section 4-201 of the Arizona Revised Statutes, the application was posted for 20
days on the premises of the applicant's property, ending January 9, 2015. No protests were received
during this time period.
Police Chief Daniel Sharp completed a standard background check on Oro Valley Country Club and
Owner/Agent Mark Oswald. Chief Sharp has no objection to the approval of the Series 6 (Bar) License.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Per Ordinance No. (O)11-16, the Town of Oro Valley charges a $500 liquor license application
processing fee to cover the costs incurred by the Town to process the application.
Per Section 8-2-6 Schedule of the Oro Valley Town Code, persons licensed by the State of Arizona to
deal in spirituous liquor within the Town shall pay an annual license fee of $80.00 to the Town.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to (recommend or deny) approval of the issuance of a Series 6 Liquor License to the Arizona
Department of Liquor Licenses and Control for Mark Oswald and principals for Oro Valley Country
Club located at 300 W. Greenock Drive.
Attachments
Oro Valley Country Club Series 6 Liquor License
TO: Mike Standish
DANIEL G. SHARP
CHIEF OF P O LI C E
FROM: ~ paniel G. Sharp
DATE: 22 December 2014
RE: Background Investigation, App lication for Liquor License
Oro Valley Country Club
300 W. Greenock Dr.
On 22 December 2014, the Oro Valley Police Department completed the standard
background check on Oro Valley Country Club Agent Mark C. Oswald. This background
check was for two liquor li censes, a Series 14 Private Club , and a Series 6 liqu or sales.
The Oro Valley Police Department has no objection for the issuance of a liquor li cense to
the Oro Valley Country Club at 300 W. Greenock Dr.
11000 N , La Canada Drive. Oro Valley, AZ 85137
Phone 520-229-4900 • Fax 520-229-4979 • www.o d.or
Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control
800 West Washington, 5th Floor
Pho eni x, Arizona 8500 7 DEC 17'14P M 3=40 TOV
www.azliquor.gov
602 ~542-5141
APPLICATION FOR LIQUOR LICENSE
TYPE OR PRINT WITH BLACK INK
Notice: Effective Nov. 1, 1997, All Owners. Agents. Partners. Stockholders1-0fficers. or Managers actively involved in the day to day operations-O f
the business must attend a Department approved liquor law training course or provide proof of attendance within the last five years. See page·'S:·of
the Liquor Li c ensing requirements. 'S:;~
SECTION 1 This application is for a : SECTION 2 ' Type of ownership: ::".,
D MORE THAN ONE LICENSE ::j\ o INTERIM PERMIT Complete Section 5 0 J.T.WR.O.S. Complete Section 6 !;:. o NEW LICENSE Complete Sections 2, 3, 4, 13, 14, 15, 16 0 INDIVIDU A L Complete Section 6 .f,
181 PER S ON TRANSFER (Bars & Liquor Stores ONLY) 0 PARTNERSHIP Complete Section 6 '::
Complete Sections 2,3,4,11, 13,15,16 0 CORPORATION Complete Section 7 '::.
181 LOCATION TRANSFER (Bars and Liquor Sto res ONLY) )g) LIMITED LIABILITY CO . Complete Sectiori't , f-, I
Complete Sections 2,3,4, 12, 13, 15, 16 0 CLUB Complete Section 8 :.:. o PRO BATE iWlLL ASSIGNMENT/DI V ORCE DECREE 0 GOVERNMENT Complete Section 10 ;;/'
Complete Sections 2, 3, 4, 9, 13, 16 (fee not required) 0 TRUST Complete Section 6
~O~R~N~omplet:"::c~s~, 4, 10, 13, 1s.:..:..!! _ 0 O ~R_(E_X plain) ____ --_--_--_---
SECTION 3 Type of license and fees LICENSE #(s): _0_6 1_0_0_22_9 ___ ~====-.,====;=;======;-
1. Ty pe of Li cen s e (s): _Se_r_ie_s_6_·_B_a_r ______________ I Depa rtm ent Use Only
2. Total fees attac hed: $ ~oo.~
APPLICA TlON FEE AND INTERIM PERMIT FEES (IF APPL~/C~A-;;-B~L;-;E::;-J-';A~R;-;::E:--;N:-;:;O:;-:T;;-R;:;-E;:=cF;:::;U7.N7.D:;-cA;-;B:O-;L--;:E:-. ..J
The fees allowed under A.R.S. 44-6852 will be charged for all dishonored checks. ----------------------
SECTION 4 Applicant
o Mr. Oswa ld Mark CI 1. Ow ne r/Age nt's N a me : 0 MS._-:-____ -:--:-__________ -:::--:-_______ a...:y __ -:--:--:-__
(Inse rt one na me ON LY to app ear on license) Last F irs t Mi ddl e
2. Corp.lPartne rs h ip/L.L .C.: OVCc, LL C --~(~E-xa-ct~~-a-s~it-ap-p-e-a~--o n-A~rt~ict~e-s -o f~l-nc-.-or~A~ru~·c~le-s~of~O~rg~.)~--------------------------------
3. Busi ness Na me : Oro Va ll ey Co un t ry Club
(Exa ctl y as it appears on the e xterio r of pre m ises)
4. Prin c ipa l Street Lo c ati on 300 W. Gree noc k Dr. Oro Va ll ey Pima 8S 737
(Do not use PO Box Number) City County Zip
5 . Bu si ness Ph o ne: 520-297 ·11 21 Day time Ph o ne : 520-33 4-7 033 Email:laine .sc hro ed er@clu bcor p.co m
6. Is t he bu siness located w ithi n t he inco rp ora ted limi ts of the a bove city o r town? I8IYE S 0 NO
7. M ai lin g Ad dress : 3030 LBJ Fr eewa y Su ite 60 0 Da ll as, Texas 7523 4
City Sta te Z'
8. Price pa id for licen se on ly bar, bee r an d win e, o r liqu o r store: Type 6 $ 2400d
P
T y pe $
Fees: :<. Ot[) ~
App li ca ti o n In te rim Pe rm it
DEPARTMENT USE ONLY
Site In spection Fin ge r P rin ts $ .lJ.. 00 QQ
----::TO::O"=T:c-A""L"'::O:-':F""A:-:L'7L--:F::::E==E:-':S'---
Is A ri zona S t a te m ent o f C it ize nship & A li e n Statu s Fo r S ta t e Be nefit s co mpl ete? ~ YES 0 NO
Accep ted by:._Q.>h.,..:>L.. _____ Date :_=!;:l"'-.:.:\",S,,---,· \L..-+-'--___ Li c. # _f}_lO \ D O~d.9
117120 1 3 'Di s abl ed individuals requiring special accommod a tion , pl eas e call (602) 542 -9027 .
1
License Type: Series 6 Bar
The bar (series 6) liquor license is a "quota" license available only through the Liquor
License Lottery or for purchase on the open market. Once issued, this liquor license is
transferable from person to person and/or location to location within the same county
and allows the holder both on-& off-sale retail privileges. This license allows a bar
retailer to sell and serve all types of spirituous liquors , primarily by individual portions, to
be consumed on the premises and in the original container for consumption on or off the
premises. A retailer with off-sale ("To Go") privileges may deliver spirituous liquor off of
the licensed premises in connection with a retail sale. A.R.S. 4-206 .0 1.F. states that
after January 1, 2011, the off-sale privileges associated with a bar license shall be
limited to no more than 30% of the total annual sales receipts of liquor by the licensee at
that location. Payment must be made no later than the time of delivery. Off-sale ("To
Go") package sales of spirituous liquor can be made on the bar premises as long as the
area of off-sale operation does not utilize a separate entrance and exit from the ones
provided for the bar. A hotel or motel with a Series 06 license may sell spirituous liquor
in sealed containers in individual portions to its registered guests at any time by means
of a minibar located in the guest rooms of registered guests. The registered guest must
be at least twenty-one (21) years of age. Access to the minibar is by a key or magnetic
card device and not furnished to a guest between the hours of 2:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m.
Internet sale of liquor is not permitted in the state of Arizona. Liquor must be delivered
to an Arizona liquor-licensed wholesaler, then an Arizona liquor-licensed retailer prior to
delivery to the consumer.
Town Council Regular Session Item # 3.
Meeting Date:02/04/2015
Submitted By:Michael Spaeth, Development Infrastructure Services
Department:Development Infrastructure Services
Information
SUBJECT:
PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
REQUEST FOR A PROPOSED AUTOBODY REPAIR USE FOR CALIBER COLLISION LOCATED
NORTH OF PUSCH VIEW LANE, APPROXIMATELY 1/4-MILE WEST OF ORACLE ROAD
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the proposed Conditional Use Permit,
subject to the conditions listed in Attachment 1.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The applicant requests a Conditional Use Permit to operate a autobody repair use on a property located
in the Mercado del Rio shopping center, north of Pusch View Lane, approximately 1/4-mile west of
Oracle Road. The subject property has a vacant car wash facility and encompasses approximately 1.3
acres. The applicant's proposal is included as Attachment 2.
The Planning and Zoning Commission considered the proposed Conditional Use Permit on January 6,
2015 (see Attachment 3 - staff report to the Planning & Zoning Commission) and has recommend
approval subject to the conditions listed in Attachment 1. This condition requires additional landscaping
along the northern property line to ensure vehicles awaiting service are screened from the Canyon del
Oro linear park.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
Current Site Conditions
The proposed autobody repair use will occupy the existing car wash facility on Lot 11 of the Mercado del
Rio shopping center. The existing building consists of:
A two-story building encompassing approximately 11,895 sq. ft., including an approximately 3,550
sq. ft. outdoor canopy area
Five (5’) foot screen wall along the west and southwest property lines
Three (3) overhead coiling door bays oriented away from interior streets
Request Detail
The applicant’s request is summarized as follows:
Leave the exterior of the existing building primarily unchanged
Construct two (2) additional overhead coiling doors
Renovate the interior of the existing car wash facility
Relocate the existing mobility-impaired accessible parking spaces
New parking along the east property line
Conditional Use Permit Analysis
The Conditional Use Permit Review Criteria contained in Section 22.5 provide the primary guidance for
evaluating conditional uses. Conditional Use Permit may be granted based on consideration of the
following criteria shown in italics:
That the granting of such conditional use permit will not be materially detrimental to public health,
safety, or welfare. In arriving at this determination, the factors which shall be considered shall
include the following:
1.
Damage or nuisance arising from noise, smoke, odor, dust, vibration or illumination;
Hazard to persons and property from possible explosion, contamination, fire or flood;
Hazard occasioned by unusual volume or character of traffic.
That the characteristics of the use proposed in such use permit are reasonably compatible with
types of uses permitted in the surrounding area.
2.
The proposed use has been reviewed and is in conformance with the criteria above. A brief description is
provided below and a detailed analysis is provided in the Planning and Zoning Commission staff report
(Attachment 3).
The proposed use will not include activities producing excessive amounts of odor or dust, hazard from
explosion or contamination or unusual volumes of traffic. The subject property is located adjacent to
existing automotive uses and is fully screened from internal drives and adjacent lots. A condition has
been added to Attachment 1, requiring additional landscaping along the northern property line to ensure
vehicles awaiting service are fully screened. The Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendation is
based on a finding that the proposed use, with the conditions in Attachment 1, is consistent with all
review criteria.
General Plan Compliance
The subject property is designated as Community/Regional Commercial on the General Plan Future
Land Use Map (Attachment 4). The applicant’s proposal to utilize an existing building located within an
existing shopping center near similar uses is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Designation,
Vision and Goals and Policies, specifically those regarding a compatible, well-balanced community.
Zoning Code Analysis
The subject property is zoned Regional Commercial C-2 (Attachment 5) which permits automotive
service uses with a Conditional Use Permit to ensure the type and character of operations won’t
negatively impact neighboring properties. The subject property is located within an existing service
commercial development and is the least visible lot from Pusch View Lane.
The approval for the car wash included additional screening requirements to mitigate against any
potential impacts to nearby properties. These mitigation measures will similarly be utilized to screen the
daily operations of the automotive service use.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION:
Summary of Public Notice
Notice to the public was provided consistent with Town-adopted noticing procedures, which includes the
following:
Letter to all property owners within 600 feet
Letter to all individuals that attended the neighborhood meeting
Posting at Town Hall
All registered HOAs
Neighborhood Meetings
A neighborhood meeting was held on December 13, 2014, with approximately 3 residents and interested
parties in attendance. Notable discussion topics included:
Compatibility with neighboring properties
Neighborhood buffers
Traffic
Noise
Potential nuisances from vehicles parked outside
A copy of the neighborhood meeting summary has been included as Attachment 6.
No additional comments or concerns have been received by Staff.
The Planning and Zoning Commission considered the proposed Conditional Use Permit on January 6,
2015. One resident spoke against the proposed Conditional Use Permit. The resident was concerned the
proposed auto body repair use did not qualify as an automotive service use and was therefore not a
permitted use in the C-2 zoning district. Staff explained that automotive services are specifically listed in
the code as conditional use in C-2. At the end of the hearing, the Planning and Zoning
Commission recommended approval of the proposed Conditional Use Permit and the draft minutes have
been provided as Attachment 7.
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to approve the Conditional Use Permit for Caliber Collision, subject to the conditions listed in
Attachment 1, based on the finding that the proposed request is consistent with all Zoning Code review
criteria.
OR
I MOVE to deny the Conditional Use Permit, finding that the proposed request is not consistent with the
Zoning Code criteria due to ____________.
Attachments
ATTACHMENT 1 - CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
ATTACHMENT 2 - APPLICANT SUBMITTAL
ATTACHMENT 3 - PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
ATTACHMENT 4 - GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP
ATTACHMENT 5 - ZONING MAP
ATTACHMENT 6 - NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING SUMMARY
ATTACHMENT 7 -DRAFT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
Attachment 1
Conditions of Approval
Town Council
February 4, 2015
Planning Conditions
1. Screening must be provided along the northern property line to ensure stored vehicles are
not visible from the shared use path along the Canyon del Oro Linear Park.
Page 1 of 14
TO: Michael Spaeth AICP, Senior Planner
Development and Infrastructure Services
Town of Oro Valley
11000 N. La Canada Drive, Oro Valley, AZ 85737
(O) 520.229.4812, mspaeth@orovalleyaz.gov
FROM: Mike Stults – mike@crossdevelopment.net
RE.: Project Narrative – Conditional Use Permit
Caliber Collision 625 East Vuelta Caminata del Rio, Oro Valley, AZ 85737
DATE: October 27, 2014
Please allow this Project Narrative to address the specific 2.0 Plan Content directives in the Oro
Valley Zoning Conditional Use Permit application.
I. PROJECT NARRATIVE:
a. Details about the type of proposed operation (including hours of operation)
The existing site/facility consist of an existing stucco building (with drive-through
canopies), landscaping, site-lighting and paving improvements. This facility was
previously operated as a Full-Service Car Wash facility and now sits vacant. The intent
of this project shall be to remove the Car-Wash equipment and perform interior
remodel so that the space may be used for Automotive Repairs . Under this scope of
work, the shop will utilized as an auxiliary facility to the existing Caliber Collision full
service Automotive Body and Paint Shop that sits immediately to the South of the
subject property. Whereas, Caliber Collision will conduct vehicle repairs that do not
require utilization of Paint-Booth. The Paint-Booth in their existing/adjacent facility will
remain as their sole facility for those purposes.
For future consideration, Caliber would like to reserve the right to wash vehicles within
the interior of the facility under review. So that the City may confirm that code
compliance will be met, a Future Car Wash Bay/Bid-Alternate design detail will be
provided in the Permit Submittal Drawings. The design will show that use of the existing
drive-through Automatic Car-Wash plumbing (i.e., oil-water separator) and floor drains
can be easily converted into an interior hand-wash stall. The design will confirm that
Page 2 of 14
water-flow/drainage calculations, proper construction techniques and materials more
than satisfy all associated local, state and federal design guidelines. Further comments
on property and personal safeguards are included within the Section 2.1.D of
Conditional Use Permit Application section of this narrative.
This shop will be operated/managed by Caliber Collision. This will be an auxiliary facility
to their existing/neighbor building. The hours of operation shall coincide with the
existing facility: Monday – Friday 9:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m.
b. Square Footage
New Tenant Improvements to the existing 8,345 SF building on a 1.27 Acre (55,151 SF)
site located at 625 East Vuelta Caminata del Rio, Oro Valley, CA 85737.
A breakout of existing vs. proposed facility square footages include the following:
Existing Facility Layout SF Proposed Layout SF
Retail Area/Restrooms
2,231 Technician Bays x 18 3876
Wash Tunnel
1,867 New Break room 510
Equipment Area
780 Restroom and Storage 3960
Detail Area
1,832 8345
Offices (2nd Floor)
1,635
Total Bldg SF
8,345
Page 3 of 14
Canopies SF Canopies SF
Vacuum Canopy
1,470 Vacuum Canopy
1,470
Finishing Canopy
2,080 Finishing Canopy
2,080
Total Canopy SF
3,550 Total Canopy SF
3,550
c. The Type of Site Improvements Required.
This intent of this project is primarily an interior remodel. The amount of Site
Improvements required is proposed to be maintenance of the existing facilities. The
following notes provide the full Scope of Work intended:
This site was constructed and equipped as a full-service commercial automatic car wash
facility. It includes interior wash tunnels and exterior vacuum stations (under drive
through canopies). The site includes full landscaping, solid masonry perimeter screen
wall, screened dumpster pad, drive lanes, parking, site lighting and handicapped
accessibility into the building. The building is a 28’8” tall two story stucco building with
clay tile roof and has multiple sectional coiling doors for vehicle entry, lounges,
equipment storage and h/c accessible lounges. Note: An asbestos survey was received
9/16/14 which confirmed that the building does not possess asbestos containing
material.
a. The first floor (6,710 SF) work shall consist of:
Remove and disposal of existing car-wash equipment (see photo below).
Demo – Interior office/lounge walls doors, door frames, millwork and floor finishes.
Reference photo below shows lobby-space millwork to be removed.
Install plywood wainscot to interior walls.
Repair / Build-back – Floor (incl. fill of wash tunnel trench), interior walls, ceilings, etc.).
Photo of Trench to be covered.
Page 4 of 14
Weather-Tight Roof (Panels/Insulation) over existing Wash Tunnel. Photo below shows
metal deck. This roof area shall receive insulation and cover (i.e., TPO or EPDM).
New lighting layout and re-circuiting of electrical switch gear: minor change in existing
interior lighting.
HVAC mods to include one (1) new five (5) ton unit (over current wash tunnel),
testing/servicing existing units and new duct layout for new space plan.
Five (5) existing sectional roll-up/coiling doors to remain. Two new (10’W x 10’H)
sectional coiling doors to be installed within exterior stucco/storefront wall. This will
require demo and re-framing area of existing exterior wall. Reference elevations.
Power-wash all concrete floor surfaces.
New Paint on all interior walls.
Misc. Minor Repairs/Repaint Exterior Walls as needed (total repaint not anticipated).
Blocking and electrical run for new wall sign (as directed by Client).
Re-Configuration (head placement) of existing wet-pipe Fire Sprinkler System.
o Pipe Sizing/Spacing will be modified to be in compliance with any layout
changes and new Code amendments since original install.
Remove Storefront Window Assembly on South end of East Wall. Replace with two (2)
new overhead coiling doors (match other existing OHDs). New shoring/bracing of wall
required.
b. Canopy modifications shall include:
Page 5 of 14
Removal of existing overhead pneumatic vacuum equipment, pedestals, wiring, etc. Cap
and patch wall, ceiling, floor/drive area after removal.
Replace existing ‘weathered’ canvas roof-screens at both canopies.
c. Site improvements shall include:
Re-configuration/relocation of handicapped parking stalls to accommodate access to
the new overhead doors (South end of the East Bldg Wall).
General clean-up of landscape beds and replacement of all dead material.
Touch-up repairs in perimeter stucco wall (as needed).
d. Exclusions:
Paint booths, equipment, or furniture.
Site Signage.
Pavement Repairs (other than repairs/restriping required to relocate H/C Stalls).
Exterior/Site Lighting.
Restroom Modifications (other than re-paint walls).
2nd Story modifications (leave as-is).
Window treatment.
Low-Voltage.
New Fencing/Walls/Gates
II. Section 2.1.D of Conditional Use Permit Application.
The granting of such CUP will not be materially detrimental to the public health,
safety, or welfare. In arriving at this determination, the factors which shall be
considered shall include the following:
i. Damage or nuisance arising from noise, smoke, odor, dust, vibration or
illumination.
Noise – The type of facility proposed shall be limited to vehicle body “prep” work
and an employee break room. The proposed vehicle repairs in this facility shal l be
limited items such as BONDO, hood replacement, fender repair, hail damage, light
interior, molding and windshield replacement. Inherently, these types of repairs are
not loud enough to project recognizable sound beyond the proposed property lines.
Furthermore, this facility shall operate with all exterior doors closed. The shop
contains a full HVAC System that shall provide climate control year-round. With all
doors closed, there should be no nuisance to neighboring properties in the way of
noise.
Page 6 of 14
Smoke – There shall be no operations on the premises that would generate smoke.
All vehicle repairs performed on-site shall be limited to “Body” work. No mechanical
work shall be performed (i.e., muffler, drive-shaft, engine seal replacement, etc.).
The tools used for the services in this environment do not generate smoke. In the
event of a fire, the facility has a fully equipment fire alarm and wet-pipe fire-
sprinkler system. In addition, fire extinguishers are placed throughout the facility
with placard notification and easy access (in accordance with local Fire Code).
Dust –
o Within the facility, light dust from BONDO application/sanding is to be
expected. The amount of dust is akin to a classroom chalkboard. At the end
of each shift, any floor space that has generated BONDO dust is broom and
vacuum cleaned. This would be the primary cause for any ‘interior dust’.
With the exterior doors being shut during working hours, none of this dust
would depart the building.
o Exterior – the only dust that would be on this facility wou ld be that which
blew in from adjacent properties. This facility has adequate paving,
perimeter landscaping and solid block walls. Nothing that occurs on this site
generates dust. Any dust that enters the site would likely attach to
perimeter landscaping and not pass through to the adjacent properties.
Vibration – No service that are performed on this site are known to generate
vibration that would be detectible. Nonetheless, if any vehicle or machine were to
enter the site that created a vibration, it would be removed and taken to a remote
facility which could perform the necessary repairs.
Illumination – The existing Site Lighting Poles generate subtle down-lighting. There
is no requirement for the Operator to request additional exterior lighting. All
interior lighting shall remain virtually undetected to adjacent properties.
Furthermore, the hours of operation: 9:00 am – 5:00 p.m. should deter any
requirement to illuminate the premises during dark-sky timeframes. In the event
that lights were inadvertently left on over-night, the employment of perimeter
screening walls, mature vegetation and down-lighting would prevent any spillover
onto adjacent land.
ii. Hazard to persons and property from possible explosion, contamination, fire or
flood.
General – This facility will operate with a low-volume containers of automotive
cleaning agents, shop towels, tools, electronic devices and an air compressor. All
material shall be stowed away in accordance with business licensing/regulations,
manufacturer’s recommendations, OSHA, Building/Electrical/Fire/Life-Safety
Codes.
Explosion/Fire – In the event of an explosion or fire, this facility’s Automatic Fire
Alarm/Fire-Sprinkler system shall be deployed. The Wet-Pipe sprinkler system
will be active and the local Fire Department will be notified via a monitored Fire
Alarm system.
Page 7 of 14
Contamination – No services are performed outside of the facility. Therefore,
no contamination should be anticipated outside the facility that would not occur
in any other parking spot (i.e., at an Elementary School or City Hall).
Nonetheless, if any unforeseen spill were to occur, it would be properly
contained and cleaned all within a paved surface. No vehicles or other activities
would occur elsewhere.
o Any run-off from interior vehicle washing shall process through three (3)
– 2,000 gallon oil-water separators before entering public sanitary sewer
lines. This system remains in-place from previous car wash drive-through
service. The amount of water/collection by the oil-separators that would
be used in the proposed use would be far less than 50% of that used by a
full-service car wash facility.
o No vehicle washing (or other services) shall be performed outside of the
building.
o Except for the designated wash-bay stall, no vehicle washing shall be
performed within any other location within the building.
o All ventilation, plumbing, lighting and equipment shall be maintained and
operational during any vehicle repairs.
o All repairs shall be performed by personnel who have received proper
training equipment and facility training.
iii. That the characteristics of the use proposed in such use permit are reasonably
compatible with the types of use permitted in the surrounding area.
In accordance with the active CCR’s that rule Mercado De l Rio, this Lot (Lot 11) falls
within the Development Plan’s permitted use for Automotive Services. As the
facility was previously constructed, no site or building activities are visible to Pusch
View Lane, nor to any other premises within the development. All vehicles entering
the site are immediately screened from ancillary view via 6’ high solid masonry wall.
NOTE: For specific screening of all customer/employee traffic, parking and vehicles
storage, please reference exhibit enclosed (next page). The photographs show actual
line-of-site from nearby lot perspectives. The ONLY development’s view of this
facility’s parking field will be from Lot 12 (located just to the South). As prescribed in
the Mercado Del Rio Covenants and Restrictions (excerpt below), Lot 12 is another
designated/approved Automotive Service Use Lot. Lot 12 is also managed by the
same entity that plans to run this proposed project. Upon completion of remodel, Lot
12 (Caliber Collision) will run both facilities simultaneously.
Page 8 of 14
CA LI BER COlLISION - PA RKI N G EXH IBIT
EXlSnNGSTlK«H:MU BLOCK WALL <;(;R EE NSALL ON -SITE PARKING FROM A LL (O MMON AREA
LOJ<; AND DRIVES NOT W EO FKALL Y DESIGNATED AS 'VEHICLE SERVICE LOTS'
Tt2S. R14f:
--Ts::s:! • J
1r"1--.r---I ·VEIOCLES AWAIT1NG REPAIR ISTORAGE) SHALL BE
ON EAST SIDE OF BUILDING.
NOTE: mE PERIMITER BLOCK WALL PREVEN"TS
VIEW OF ALL STORAGE PARKING FROM ALL -NON -
VEHICLE REPAlR-PROPERnESANDWM MON AREA
DRIVE-AISLES AND BEYOND.
Page 9 of 14
This shop will be operated/maintained by the same Caliber Collision shop that is
currently in operation next door.
Notwithstanding the above, the following “Mercado Del Rio CCR’s” regulations shall
be upheld:
DEVELOPMENT PLAN F O R :
MERCADO DEL RIO
LOT 11
=. J -~--,------r I
\ =. fCl ---'I -fL-~
LOfM LCII'G
I I
DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS
FOR
MERCADO DEL RIO
THIS DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS FOR MERCADO DEL RIO (this "Declaration") is made aod executed as of
'ttcu.fttL .:J.,-II. ,2004, by Lawyers Title Agency of Arizona, Trust No . 18080-T, which
is Declaraot.
ARTICLE 5
PERMITTED USES AND RESTRICTIONS
5.2 Automobile Services Uses. Automobile services uscs shall be limited to Lots II
through 15. All automobile service aod repair activities on those Lots shall be screened from
view such that the automobile service aod repair activities arc visible neither from Pusch View
Laoe nor from aoy other non-automobile serv i ce use Lots within the Mercado del Rio
development.
Page 10 of 14
5.7 Mineral Exploration. No Lot nor Block A shall be used in any manner to
explore for or to remove any water, oil or other hydrocarbons, minerals of any kind, gravel, earth
or any earth substance of any kind.
5.8 Trash Containers and Collection. No garbage or trash shall be placed or kept
on any Lot or Block A, except in bins designated by the Board. All trash receptacle enclosure
areas shall have gates with self-closing latches. The Board may adopt such reasonable Rules as it
deems necessary regarding bins and collection of trash, including Rules to be in force on a
temporary basis during any period of construction of Improvements on any Lot or Block A. All
rubbish, trash or garbage shall be promptly removed from all Lots and shall not be allowed to
accwnulate thereon. No outdoor incinerators shall be kept or maintained on any Lot or Block A.
5.13 Vehicles. No vehicles may be stored on the Property ovemight other than
vehicles directly used in the active conduct of uses or businesses being conducted on the
Property, and such vehicles may ouly be stored on the Lot on which such use or business is being
conducted. All vehicles parked on the Property mnst fit into a single designated parking space.
The Board shall have the authority to enact reasonable Rules relating to vehicles and traffic on
the Property.
5.14 Lighting. The Board may enact Rules relating to intemal and extemallighting on
all portions of the Property. The rules may be all encompassing, including regulating wattage,
direction, times when lighting is permitted and any other rule relating to lighting.
5.15 Nnisances. No rubbish or debris of any kind shall be placed or permitted to
accumulate upon any portion of the Property for any umeasonable time, and no odors shall be
permitted to arise therefrom, so as to render the Property or any portion thereof unsanitary,
unsightly, oITensive or detrimental to any other portion of the Property in the vicinity thereof or
to its Owners or Occupants. No loud, noxious or offensive activity shall be carried on or
permitted on any Lot, nor shall anything be done thereon which may be, or may become, an
annoyance or nuisance to Persons or property in the vicinity of such Lot, or which shall interfere
with the quiet enjoyment of each of the Owners and Occupants provided, however, that the
activities of, and consequences stenuning from, uses and business conducted on the Property in
accordance with Applicable Law and, if required, approved by Declarant, shall be deemed to be
not in violation of this provision. The Board shall have the right to determine, in its sole
discretion, whether the provisions of this Section 5.15 have been violated. Any decision
rendered by the Board shall be enforceable and be binding in the same manner as other
restrictions in this Declaration.
5.16 Drainage. No Owner or Occupant or other Person shall interfere with the
drainage established for any portion of the Property by Declarant. No Owner or Occupant or
other Person shall obstruct, divert, alter or interfere in any way with the drainage of ground and
surface water upon, across or over any portion of the Lots, Conunon Use Areas or other portions
of the Property, including, bnt not limited to, construction or installation of any type of structure
or vegetation.
5.11 Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning Units. No heating, air conditioning
or evaporative cooling units or equipment shall be placed, constructed or maintained upon the
Property in any places other than as permitted under the Design Guidelines.
Page 11 of 14
General Notes about the Operator:
As a multi-state/multi-operator of Body Shops, Caliber Collision is well versed in the
procedures and requirements to divert any operational hazards. Prior to opening for
business, Caliber Collision will secure a Business License to operate said facility. Any
hazardous material shall be documented, handled and/or stored per local, state and
federal requirements. Furthermore, the existing facility contains a code-compliant fully
monitored fire alarm system, a complete automatic sprinkler system, and exterior fire
department connection.
The existing facility (site and building) has been inspected by licensed
Architects/Engineers who are thoroughly versed in Body Shop Designs. Final interior
improvement designs shall be designed by same Architects/Engineers. Interior Lighting,
HVAC Ventilation, and Storm Sewer oil/sand interceptors shall be properly placed to
facility safe conditions within and outside the entire property. These designs shall
receive City of Oro Valley Plans Review/Permit Approval to ensure structural, life safety,
ADA and Building Code compliance for the proposed operations.
Furthermore, the operator implements specific operational and safety guidelines that
secure on-going daily assurance of employee, customer, property and surrounding area
safety. These include:
1. Drug Testing – Applicants are required to pass drug screening. Once employed, Caliber
reserves the right to perform both random and/or employee-specific testing. Any failure
results in immediate loss of employment.
2. Authorized Employment – Applicants are required to provide proof of citizenship and/or
verification that they are authorized to be lawfully employment in the US.
3. Background Checks – Applicants are required to pass a background check. This includes but
is not limited to any incidents involving sexual crime, child endangerment, and other acts of
violent nature.
Page 12 of 14
4. Facility Management – Each facility is managed with adequate and competent staff to
oversee and monitor the repair services and customer interface.
5. Safety Training – Given the nature of using automated machinery and restoration supplies,
each employee is required to complete and continue ongoing safety training. All equipment
used is state of the art and properly maintained. This instruction safeguards the employees,
the environment, the clients, their vehicles and all neighboring facilities.
a. All training guidelines ensure prevention of the following:
i. Loud noise, fumes, odors, dust, vibration, illumination
ii. Fire, explosions, flooding,
iii. Contamination of persons, property or nearby equipment
6. Environmental Protection Agency and other Governmental Regulations – All products
used, services rendered, and disposals of waste are highly regulated to prevent unwanted
affects. All products and equipment are designed to ensure compliance. Laws and
limitations are monitored and enforced so that any employee, clientele and passerby may
be assured of a safe environment
E. Compatibility of the Proposed Facility with Surrounding:
Applicant suggests that this facility will serve as the single-most compatible site with the types
of uses permitted in the surrounding area. This facility will act as an extension of the existing
Caliber Collision. As such, it will promote further success of an existing business, re-occupancy
of an existing vacant facility, provide expanded job growth and assurance of good custodial care.
Finally, please note the contributions that Caliber Collision brings surrounding communities for
all of their locations. Among their traditions of charity and community enrichment programs
(http://calibercollision.com/about-us/community-involvement/), Caliber Collision actively
supports:
• American Heart Association Heart Walk, American Heart Association Cotes Du Coeur,
and Children’s Advocacy Center of Collin County
• Military personnel through Carry The Load, Wounded Warriors and 3M’s Hire Our
Heroes program
• Supplied local food banks with more than 275,000 meals for needy families in 2013
• Gifted 13 fully-refurbished vehicles to needy families through the Caliber Collision
Recycled Rides program in 2012. Plan on gifting 25 in 2013
To further endorse their commitment to excellence, USAA has identified Caliber Collision as
having “an exceptionally high standard when it comes to service delivery (ref. attached 7/15/14
News Release).”
Page 13 of 14
MISCELLANOUS REFERENCE PHOTOS
From SE of Site Looking West at South
Canopy
Drive/Parking East side of Bldg North end of East Wall
Looking West at North end of Bldg Looking West at North Canopy
Page 14 of 14
Looking West – North end of Property Under N Canopy (remove
vacuum/replace canvas screens)
Facing South – NW end of Bldg Facing South – West side of
Bldg
From Adjacent Property to West From SW of Site
Respectfully Submitted,
Mike Stults
Cross Development, LLC
Mike@CrossDevelopment.net
Office: 214614-8252
Mob: 515-491-6942
Conditional Use Permit
Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report
CASE NUMBER: OV814-003 - Caliber Collision Auto Center
MEETING DATE: January 6, 2015
AGENDA ITEM: 3
STAFF CONTACT: Michael Spaeth, Senior Planner
mspaeth@orovalleyaz.gov (520) 229-4812
Applicant: Chen Architects, Ming Chen
Request: Conditional Use Permit to allow auto body repair facility
Location: Mercado del Rio shopping center Lot 11. North of Pusch View Lane,
approximately ¼ mile west of the Pusch View Lane and Oracle Road
intersection.
Recommendation: Approve with the conditions listed in Attachment 1.
SUMMARY:
The applicant requests a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to operate an auto body repair use on
Lot 11 of the Mercado del Rio shopping center, located north of Pusch View Lane
approximately ¼ mile west of the intersection with Oracle Road. The subject property
encompasses approximately 1.2 acres and currently contains an existing car wash facility
which has ceased operation.
The proposed auto body repair use requires a CUP in a Regional Commercial (C-2) Zoning
District. The proposed use will utilize the existing car wash structure and outdoor canopy area,
with building renovations primarily taking place on the interior of the building. The applicant is
proposing to add two new overhead coiling doors, relocating the existing mobility-impaired
accessible parking spaces and adding new parking space striping.
The renovated building will serve as an auxiliary facility to the existing Caliber Collision
Automotive Service center on Lot 12, immediately south of the subject property. The proposed
facility will include a vehicle body “prep” area and an employee break room. The majority of the
business operations will remain in the building to the south. The proposed use will include
temporary outdoor storage of vehicles awaiting service. A condition has been added to
Attachment 1 to add additional screening along the northern property line to further screen
stored vehicles. The applicant’s proposal is consistent with the Conditional Use Permit Review
Criteria, subject to the conditions listed in Attachment 1. The applicant’s proposal is included
as Attachment 2.
OV 814-003 Caliber Collision Automotive Service Center Page 2 of 7
Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report
BACKGROUND/DETAILED INFORMATION:
The Existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning for the property and the surrounding area is
summarized below and depicted in Attachments 3 and 4.
Land Use and Zoning
EXISTING LAND USE GENERAL PLAN ZONING
SUBJECT
PROPERTY
Existing Vacant Car
Wash
Community/Regional
Commercial
Regional Commercial
(C-2)
NORTH
Canyon del Oro Wash Open Space Single-family Residential
(R1-144)
SOUTH
Caliber Collision Auto
Service Center
Community/Regional
Commercial
Regional Commercial
(C-2)
EAST
Rooney Ranch
Shopping Center
Community/Regional
Commercial Rooney Ranch PAD
WEST
Vacant (Mercado del
Rio shopping center)
Community/Regional
Commercial
Regional Commercial
(C-2)
Approvals to Date
May 2004: Mercado del Rio Master Development Plan/Preliminary Plat
approved by Town Council.
October 2004: Mercado del Rio Final Plat approved by Town Council.
May 2005: Conditional Use Permit for Car Wash approved by Town Council.
Existing Site Details
The proposed auto body repair use will occupy the existing car wash facility on Lot 11 of the
Mercado del Rio shopping center. The existing building consists of the following:
Approximately 8,345 sq. ft. including:
o Wash tunnel
o Offices
o Equipment and detail area
Approximately 3,550 sq. ft. outdoor canopy area, fully screened from adjacent
properties
OV 814-003 Caliber Collision Automotive Service Center Page 3 of 7
Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report
Building height of 28’8”
Five (5’) foot screen wall along the west and southwest property lines
Three (3’) foot screen wall along the east property line
Three overhead coiling door bays facing east (away from interior streets)
Request Detail
The applicant’s request is summarized as follows:
Leave the exterior of the existing building primarily unchanged and renovate the interior
of the existing car wash facility.
Construct two additional overhead coiling doors oriented east, away from interior
roadways. The new coiling doors are proposed adjacent to the three existing coiling
doors and will be designed to architecturally match the existing doors (see Attachment 2
– Pg. 4).
The relocation of the existing mobility-impaired accessible parking spaces.
New parking along the east property line. The new and relocated mobility-impaired
accessible parking spaces will be reviewed by staff during the building permit process.
Interior renovations will include:
o The removal of all existing car-wash equipment and remodeling to accommodate
interior space for vehicle body work.
o The modification of one bay into a detail/wash bay for future use.
o Minimally updating the second floor office space and existing restroom facilities.
DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:
Conditional Use Permit Analysis
The Conditional Use Permit Review Criteria contained in Section 22.5 provide the primary
guidance for evaluating conditional uses. Conditional Use Permits may be granted based on
consideration of the following criteria shown in italics, followed by staff commentary:
That the granting of such conditional use permit will not be materially detrimental to public
health, safety, or welfare. In arriving at this determination, the factors which shall be
considered shall include the following:
Damage or nuisance arising from noise, smoke, odor, dust, vibration or illumination;
The proposed automotive service operations will involve vehicle body “prep” work,
including bonding, hood replacement, fender repair, hail damage repair and windshi eld
replacement. These types of repair operations may minimally contr ibute to existing
noise levels; however, the applicant has stated operations will take place entirely within
the confines of the building with the overhead doors closed. Any impacts from noise
OV 814-003 Caliber Collision Automotive Service Center Page 4 of 7
Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report
generated by these repair operations will be further minimized by the existing screen
walls and landscaping.
The type of operations anticipated for the facility do not include activities that produce
excessive amounts of odor or smoke. Within the facility a negligible amount of dust will
be produced during vehicle body work. Operations will take place with the overhead
doors closed, therefore no dust is anticipated to be emitted outside of the building.
Regular operations are not anticipated to produce excessive amounts of vibration or
illumination. The proposed use will be required to comply with the Town of Oro Valley
Outdoor Lighting standards and regulations. The proposed use meets this criteria.
Hazard to persons and property from possible explosion, contamination, fire or flood;
The proposed use will utilize a low-volume of automotive cleaning agents, vehicle body
work tools, electronic devices and an air compressor. The anticipated business practices
would not be expected to create hazards generated by explosion, contamination, fire or
flood. The proposed use is comprehensively regulated by the International Building and
Fire Codes. Typical emergency response systems currently exist in the vacant car wash
building including fire sprinklers and oil-water separators to protect against off-property
contamination.
Hazard occasioned by unusual volume or character of traffic.
The everyday business operations are not anticipated to generate unusual volumes or
character of traffic. The applicant has stated the need to temporarily store vehicles
outside in the parking lot while awaiting service. The original mitigation measures
employed for the car wash, the screen walls and additional landscaping, will serve to
thoroughly screen vehicles from the adjacent properties and roadways. A condition has
been added to Attachment 1 to add additional landscaping along the north property line
to ensure the storage of vehicles are adequately screened from multi-use path north of
the property.
That the characteristics of the use proposed in such use permit are reasonably compatible with
types of uses permitted in the surrounding area.
Lots 11, 12 and 13 of the Mercado del Rio shopping center were identified as those
where automotive uses are permitted. The proposed auto body repair use will utilize the
existing car wash building which will be renovated to serve the intended purpose. The
subject property is located adjacent to the rear of the commercial properties to the west
and is the furthest lot from Pusch View Lane. Repurposing the existing building and
utilizing the mitigation measures implemented for the car wash, will ensure the proposed
use will have a minimal impact on surrounding areas.
OV 814-003 Caliber Collision Automotive Service Center Page 5 of 7
Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report
The approved Landscape Plan established all required buffer yards. A condition has been
added to Attachment 1 to require additional landscaping along the northern property line
to further screen the vehicle storage from the nearby multi-use path.
General Plan Compliance
The subject properties are designated as Community/Regional Commercial on the General Plan
Future Land Use Map.
The Community/Regional Commercial General Plan land use designation is defined as:
“This designation is for commercial areas at the intersections of principal arterials.”
The subject property is a component of the larger Mercado del Rio shopping center. The applicant’s
proposal is consistent with this General Plan land use designation.
Conditional Use Permit applications are also evaluated for consistency with the Vision, Goals and
Policies of the General Plan. The following section provides analysis relative to the consistency of
the Conditional Use Permit request with the General Plan Vision and key General Plan Goals and
Policies. Excerpts from the General Plan are shown in italics, followed by staff comment.
To be a well planned community that uses its resources to balance the needs of today against the
potential impacts to future generations. Oro Valley’s lifestyle is defined by the highest standard of
environmental integrity, education, infrastructure, services, and public safety. It is a community of
people working together to create the Town’s future with a government that is responsive to
residents and ensures the long-term financial stability of the Town.
Goal 1.3 To promote a compatible mix of land uses throughout the Oro Valley Planning Area
The applicant’s proposal is to occupy an existing, currently vacant building representing an
opportunity for infill development. The subject property is located within a service commercial
development in close proximity to a principal arterial intersection. The facility is located on Lot
11 within the shopping center, furthest from existing residential and fully screened from public
roadways. The applicant’s proposal to utilize an existing building located within an existing
shopping center near similar uses is consistent with both the General Plan Vision and this
General Plan Goal regarding a compatible, well balanced community.
Zoning Code Analysis
Auto body repair requires a Conditional Use Permit in the Regional Commercial (C-2) zoning
district to ensure the type and character of operations won’t negatively impact neighboring
properties. The subject property is located within an existing service commercial development
and is the furthest lot from Pusch View Lane. Subsequently, the nearest residential is located
approximately 650 feet across Pusch View Lane. The approval for the car wash included
additional screening requirements to mitigate against any potential impacts to nearby
OV 814-003 Caliber Collision Automotive Service Center Page 6 of 7
Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report
properties. These mitigation measures will similarly be utilized to screen the daily operations of
the auto body repair use.
Engineering
The applicant’s proposal acknowledges that the site will remain in its current state. As a result
site drainage will be maintained per the approved site improvements.
The use of the new building as proposed will not generate additional traffic as only employees
will utilize the new building as additional workspace for the existing building. Patrons of the
business will not conduct business or utilize the new building. Therefore, the traffic impact to
the surrounding street network as a result of this use is negligible.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION:
Summary of Public Notice
Notice to the public was provided consistent with Town-adopted noticing procedures, which
includes the following:
Letter to all property owners within 600 feet
Letter to all individuals that attended the neighborhood meeting.
Posting at Town Hall
All registered HOAs
Neighborhood Meetings
A neighborhood meeting was held on December 13, 2014 with approximately 3 residents and
interested parties in attendance. Notable discussion topics included:
Compatibility with neighboring properties
Neighborhood buffers
Traffic
Noise
Potential nuisances from vehicles parked outside
A copy of the neighborhood meeting summary has been included as Attachment 5.
No additional comments or concerns have been received by Staff.
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the following findings:
OV 814-003 Caliber Collision Automotive Service Center Page 7 of 7
Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report
The proposed use will not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety or
welfare
The proposed use is consistent with the Conditional Use Permit Review Criteria.
The proposed use will utilize an existing, currently vacant facility, thereby
promoting infill development.
It is recommended that the Planning and Zoning Commission take the following action:
Recommend approval to the Town Council of the requested Conditional Use Permit
OV814-003, subject to the conditions on Attachment 1.
SUGGESTED MOTIONS:
I move to recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit for the Caliber Collision
Automotive Service center, based on the findings in the staff report.
OR
I move to recommend denial of the Conditional Use Permit for the Caliber Collision Automotive
Service center finding that _____________________.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Conditions of Approval
2. Applicant’s Proposal
3. General Plan Land Use Map
4. Zoning Map
5. Neighborhood Meeting Summary
___________________________________________
Bayer Vella, Interim Planning Manager
GENERAL PLAN MAP
CALIBER COLLISION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
(OV814-003)
Attachment 4
Open Space
low Density
Residential - 1
Open Space
ZONING MAP
CALIBER COLLISION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
(OV814-003)
Attachment 5
Rl-144
C-1
Rl-36
Rooney
Ranch
PAD
t
Oro Valley
Town
Center
PAD
Attachment 6
Neighborhood Meeting Summary
Town Council
February 4, 2015
Neighborhood Meeting Summary
November 13, 2014
6:00 – 7:30 PM
Town of Oro Valley Council Chambers, 11000 N La Canada Drive
1. Introductions and Welcome
Meeting Facilitator Matt Michels, Senior Planner, introduced the Oro Valley staff Michael
Spaeth, Senior Planner, as project manager. Approximately 4 residents and interested parties
attended the meeting, including Councilmember Joe Hornat.
2. Staff Presentation
Michael Spaeth, Senior Planner, provided a presentation that included:
Summary of Conditional Use Permits
Required Review Process for Conditional Use Permits
Next steps
3. Applicant Presentation
Ming Chen, Chen Architects, provided a presentation detailing the applicant’s proposal, which
included:
Overview of the Company
Federal Regulations for Automotive Service centers
Overview of project
4. Public Questions & Comments
Following is a summary of additional questions and comments:
Potential effect on future uses within the shopping center
Is the proposed use actually permitted?
What specific operations will be moved to the new location?
Will the open bay doors be an issue?
What are the plans for cars left outside overnight?
Compatibility the adjacent (Target) shopping center?
Mr. Chen addressed some of the questions related to the proposed development and the
associated impacts.
Mr. Michels closed the meeting, thanked everyone for their attendance and encouraged everyone
to contact Mr. Spaeth, the project manager, with any additional thoughts, comments or concerns.
January 6, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 1 of 2
MINUTES
ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
REGULAR SESSION
January 6, 2015
ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE
REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER
Acting Chair Rodman called the January 6, 2015 session of the Oro Valley Planning
and Zoning Commission meeting to order at 6:00 PM.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Bill Rodman, Chairman
Bill Leedy, Vice-Chair
Greg Hitt, Commissioner
Frank Pitts, Commissioner
Tom Drazazgowski, Commissioner
Melanie Barrett, Commissioner
Charlie Hurt, Commissioner
ALSO PRESENT:
Joe Hornat, Council Member
Lou Waters, Vice-Mayor
Bayer Vella, Planning Manager
Joe Andrews, Chief Civil Deputy Attorney
David Laws, Permit Division Manager
Amanda Jacobs, Economic Development Manager
Greg Caton, Town Manager
3. PUBLIC HEARING: CALIBER COLLISION AUTO CARE CENTER
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN BODY REPAIR USE ON MERCADO
DEL RIO LOT 11, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF PUSCH VIEW LANE,
APPROXIMATELY ¼ MILE WEST OF ORACLE ROAD, OV814-003
Michael Spaeth, Senior Planner, Presented the following:
- Location Map
- What is a Conditional Use Permit
- Screening
- Summary and Recommendation
January 6, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 2 of 2
Chairman Rodman opened the public hearing.
Mike Stults, non-resident, project manager and representing the applicant, provided a
brief overview of the project.
Bill Adler, Oro Valley resident, expressed that he can't find anything in the zoning code
for auto repair shop that is a conditionally permitted use in this zoning district. This is
not a question of interpretation. In this particular case we either have a permitted use in
this zoning district or conditionally permitted use, but it isn't enough to simple say this is
automobile related.
Chairman Rodman closed the public hearing.
MOTION: A motion was made by Commissioner Hitt and seconded by Commissioner
Pitts to recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit for the Caliber Collision
Automotive Service center, based on the findings in the staff report and Attachment 1.
MOTION carried, 7-0.
Attachment 1
Conditions of Approval
Town Council
February 4, 2015
Planning Conditions
1. Screening must be provided along the northern property line to ensure
stored vehicles are not visible from the shared use path along the Canyon
del Oro Linear Park.
ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: A motion was made by Commissioner Leedy and seconded by Commissioner
Drazazgowski to adjourn the January 6, 2015, Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting at 8:22 PM.
MOTION carried, 7-0.
Town Council Regular Session Item # 4. a.
Meeting Date:02/04/2015
Requested by: Bayer Vella
Submitted By:Rosevelt Arellano
Development Infrastructure Services
Department:Development Infrastructure Services
Information
SUBJECT:
RESOLUTION NO. (R)15-13, DECLARING THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE ORO VALLEY
ZONING CODE SECTION 24.9 AND CHAPTER 24, RELATING TO ECONOMIC EXPANSION ZONE
OVERLAY DISTRICT, PROVIDED AS EXHIBIT “A” WITHIN THE ATTACHED RESOLUTION AND
FILED WITH THE TOWN CLERK, A PUBLIC RECORD
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
This is a procedural item to declare the draft ordinance a matter of public record. The draft ordinance has
been posted online and made available in the Town Clerk's Office. If the final version is adopted, as
approved by Town Council, it will be made available in the same manner.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
Once adopted by Town Council, this proposed resolution will become a public record and will save the
Town on advertising costs since the Town will forgo publishing the entire draft ordinance in print form.
The current draft version of the draft ordinance has been posted on the Town's website and a printed
copy is available for public review in the Town Clerk's Office. Once adopted, the final version will be
published on the Town's website.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The Town will save on advertising costs by meeting publishing requirements by reference, without
including the pages of amendments.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to (adopt or deny) Resolution No. (R)15-13, declaring the proposed amendments to the Oro
Valley Zoning Code Revised Section 24.9 and Chapter 24, attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and filed with
the Town Clerk, a public record.
Attachments
(R)15-13 EEZ Overlay District Amendment
Exhibit "A"
C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 6\@BCL@CC069B58\@BCL@CC069B58.doc
RESOLUTION NO. (R)15-13
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN
OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, DECLARING THE PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS TO THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED
SECTION 24.9, ECONOMIC EXPANSION ZONE, ATTACHED
HERETO AS EXHIBIT “A” AND FILED WITH THE TOWN
CLERK, A PUBLIC RECORD
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO
VALLEY, ARIZONA, that the proposed amendments to the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised
Section 24.9, Economic Expansion Zone, three copies of the proposed amendments which are on
file in the office of the Town Clerk, is hereby declared to be a public record, and said copies are
ordered to remain on file with the Town Clerk.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley,
Arizona this 4th day of February, 2015.
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
____________________________________
Dr. Satish I. Hiremath, Mayor
ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______
Julie K. Bower, Town Clerk Tobin Sidles, Legal Services Director
Date: __________________________Date:
C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 6\@BCL@CC069B58\@BCL@CC069B58.doc
Exhibit “A”
Zoning Code Amendment
Modified Text Amendment
Additions shown in ALL CAPS
Deletions shown in strikethrough font
Section 24.9 Economic Expansion Zone
A. Purpose
The purpose of this overlay district is to provide a streamlined review process for development in Rancho
Vistoso Neighborhood 3 (Innovation Park), thereby supporting Town economic development initiatives
while preserving and protecting the health, safety, and welfare of the community.
B. Applicability
The Economic Expansion Zone (EEZ) review process is available to all property located within the EEZ
Innovation Park Overlay District boundaries, which include Innovation Park in Rancho Vistoso
Neighborhood 3, with the exception of any property within six hundred (600) feet of Rancho Vistoso PAD
Residential Zones, as depicted in the overlay map, attached to the ordinance codified in this section.
1. The EEZ process is available to new development, or additions, expansions, or changes to
existing development proposing permitted uses and otherwise consistent with existing zoning
and development standards.
2. The provisions of this section do not apply to applications for amendments to the zoning or
planned area development standards, or applications for conditional use permits.
C. General Provisions
1. Exemption from Conceptual Design REVIEW AND Approval Process. Development
applications complying with the requirements of subsection B of this section shall be exempted
from the following requirements:
a. CDRB review and Town Council approval of conceptual site plan, conceptual
architecture, and conceptual public art, as contained in Section 22.9.A and Section
22.9.D.4.
a. THE SUBMITTAL OF CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATIONS AND
ASSOCIATED CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AND TOWN COUNCIL
REVIEW.
b. Public outreach requirements of Section 22.15.
2. Approvals Required. Development applications complying with the requirements of subsection B
of this section shall comply with the following review and approval process:
a. FINAL DESIGN REVIEW AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 22.9.
i. The form and content of all submittals shall comply with Section 22.9.D.2.
ii. The application shall be distributed for agency review consistent with Section
22.9.D.3.
iii. The review time frames shall be consistent with established review periods.
b. The Planning and Zoning Administrator shall evaluate conformance of conceptual
FINAL design review submittals to the Zoning Code, with specific emphasis on:
i. Conformance with conceptual design review principles (Section 22.9.D.5 and
Section 27.3.H).
ii. Conformance with Addendum A design standards.
c. UPON REVIEW OF FINAL DESIGN APPLICATIONS, the Planning and Zoning
Administrator shall make specific findings of compliance with applicable conceptual
design principles, Addendum A design standards, and other provisions of the Zoning
Code and shall generate a report of said findings.
d. The Planning and Zoning Administrator shall approve, disapprove or conditionally
approve the conceptual FINAL design submittal based on specific findings as outlined in
the report.
e. Conditions may be imposed in order to fully carry out the provisions and intent of the
Zoning Code.
D. UPON WRITTEN REQUEST BY THE APPLICANT, THE PLANNING AND ZONING
ADMINISTRATOR MAY APPROVE AN ALTERNATIVE PARKING RATIO, SUBJECT TO
THE REVIEW CRITERIA OUTLINED IN SECTION 27.7.C.2 OF THE ZONING CODE.
AN ALTERNATIVE PARKING RATIO SHALL NOT BE DEEMED INCONSISTENT WITH
THE ZONING CODE AS REFERENCED IN THE ABOVE SECTION 24.9.B.1.
3. Applicant Appeal of Administrative Decision
a. The approval, with or without conditions, or denial of an application shall be final unless,
within twenty (20) days from the date of the Planning and Zoning Administrator’s
decision, the applicant files an appeal in writing to the Town Clerk.
b. Such appeal shall be submitted in writing to the Town Clerk and shall indicate where, in
the opinion of the appellant, the Planning and Zoning Administrator was in error.
c. The Town Clerk shall schedule the appeal for Town Council review and the Town
Council, at its meeting, shall uphold, modify or overrule the decision.
d. The decision of the Town Council shall be final.
4. Town Council Review of Administrative Decision
a. The approval, with or without conditions, or denial of an application shall be final unless,
within twenty (20) days from the date of the Planning and Zoning Administrator’s
decision, a majority of the Town Council requests review of the Planning and Zoning
Administrator’s decision.
b. The Town Council shall have the right and prerogative to initiate its own review of any
decision of the Planning and Zoning Administrator.
c. The Town Council shall uphold, modify, or overrule the decision or may refer the
application to the Conceptual Design Review Board for their recommendation prior to
taking action.
d. Notice of Town Council-initiated review of an administrative decision shall be given to
the applicant by the Town Clerk within ten (10) days of Town Council action.
e. The decision of the Town Council shall be final.
Town Council Regular Session Item # 4. b.
Meeting Date:02/04/2015
Requested by: Bayer Vella
Submitted By:Rosevelt Arellano
Development Infrastructure Services
Department:Development Infrastructure Services
Information
SUBJECT:
PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE NO. (O)15-05, AMENDING SECTION 24.9, ECONOMIC EXPANSION ZONE (EEZ)
OVERLAY DISTRICT, OF THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED TO ELIMINATE THE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
REVIEW PROCESS AND ALLOW ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL OF ALTERNATIVE PARKING RATIOS
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the proposed revisions depicted in
Attachment 1, Exhibit "A."
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
In 2012, the Town Council adopted the Economic Expansion Zone (EEZ) Overlay District for Rancho
Vistoso Neighborhood 3 (aka Innovation Park). The purpose of the EEZ is to promote development in
Innovation Park by enabling a streamlined administrative Conceptual Design review and approval
process.
Since its adoption, there have been several EEZ projects that have highlighted two (2) areas of needed
improvement: 1) Inefficiency of the site plan review process 2) Developer's inability to provide more or
less parking spaces than the Zoning Code requires (alternative parking ratio). The proposed code
amendment seeks to address these issues by:
Incorporating the Conceptual Design review process into the Final Design review.1.
Enabling developers the ability to request administrative reviews of alternative parking ratios. 2.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
The purpose of the EEZ is to promote development in Innovation Park by enabling a shorter
and faster review process. When companies are looking to relocate or expand, they
typically evaluate multiple sites in multiple jurisdictions. It is important to position Oro Valley
to be competitive as these future economic development opportunities present themselves.
The proposed amendment would improve the overall review time of EEZ projects and help
attract targeted industries.
The following is background information on the two (2) components of the amendment.
Conceptual and Final Design Review
The current EEZ process consists of two steps: 1) Conceptual Design Review 2) Final
Design Review. The purpose of the Conceptual Design Review is to ensure that a project’s
overall design (i.e. site layout, architecture and public art) is functional and compatible within
its boundaries and the surrounding area. Under the EEZ process, the Conceptual Design is
administratively approved and does not require the normal Conceptual Design Review
Board (CDRB) recommendation and Town Council approval. The purpose of the Final
Design Review is to ensure that a project is consistent with the approved Conceptual
Design and other applicable zoning provisions.
After working with the EEZ for over two (2) years, it has been determined that the
information and review components of the Conceptual Design can be incorporated into the
Final Design, which will eliminate one step in the process, resulting in time efficiency and
promotion of economic development within Innovation Park.
Parking Standards
The current EEZ provisions do not enable developers the ability to request administrative
approval of an alternative parking ratio (i.e. request to propose more or less parking spaces
than required by the Zoning Code), which currently requires CDRB approval.
Under the current code, an EEZ project, which normally would be reviewed administratively,
is elevated to the CDRB and Town Council based on an alternative parking ratio request.
The alternative parking ratio request is a technical analysis that can be adequately decided
by the Planning and Zoning Administrator, and maintained for the intended streamlined
process for project approval. Alternative parking ratio requests will continue to require
conformance with the approval criteria, with the purpose to ensure that alternative parking
ratio request is more accurate than the parking standards outlined in the Zoning Code.
General Plan Analysis
The proposed code amendment was reviewed for conformance with the Vision, Goals and
Policies of the General Plan. Listed below are relevant policies within the General Plan
relating to economic development, followed by staff commentary:
Goal 3.1 To ensure long-term financial and economic sustainability for the Town of Oro
Valley.
Staff Comment: The proposed code amendment assists in attracting and retaining skilled,
professional level jobs in targeted industries, which create wealth for the community and
have a multiplier effect by creating additional jobs in the retail and service sector due to the
increased demand for goods and services from the income generated by primary jobs.
This job creation contributes directly and indirectly to the economic long-term sustainability
of other sectors of the local economy, including retail, service, and government services.
Policy 3.1.1 The Town shall ensure that future growth reflects the desires of the
community in balance with an analysis of the Town's financial needs…to ensure that future
development will complement community values and implement the community's economic
vision for the future, while maintaining the ability of Oro Valley to attract and retain desirable
businesses.
Staff Comment: The proposed amendment serves to “implement the community’s economic
vision for the future” by encouraging established Innovation Park businesses to grow and
expand while providing a desirable incentive for new businesses to locate to Oro Valley.
Policy 3.1.2 The Town shall continue to strive for a diverse economic base that will help
reduce Oro Valley's dependence on revenues derived from growth-related sources.
Encourage and support the following types of uses as means of diversifying the local tax
base, increasing local employment opportunities, and decreasing expenditure leakage to
nearby communities.
Staff Comment: As discussed, the creation of professional level jobs enhances the
economic stability and vitality of the community in a number of important ways, including
increasing revenue for existing retail and service businesses.
Planning and Zoning Commission Review
The amendment was heard by the Planning and Zoning Commission on January 6, 2015.
The main topic discussed at the meeting included general information on the site plan
process. At the conclusion of the meeting, the Commission voted to recommend approval of
the amendment. The Planning and Zoning Commission staff report is included as
Attachment 2 and the draft minutes are included as Attachment 3.
Public Notification and Comment
Public notice has been provide as follows:
All HOAs in the Town were notified of this hearing
Public hearing notice was posted in the Territorial newspaper
At Town Hall
On the Town website
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to approve Ordinance No. (O)15-05, amending Section 24.9 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code as
provided in Attachment 1, finding that the amendment meets the intent of the Economic Expansion Zone
Overlay District.
OR
I MOVE to deny Ordinance No. (O)15-05, finding that the proposed amendment is not warranted at this
time due to ________________________________.
Attachments
Attachment 1 - (O)15-05 Amending EEZ Overlay District
Exhibit A
Attachment 2 - PZC Staff Report
Attachment 3 - 1/6/15 Draft P&Z Minutes
C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 6\@BCL@5C160C66\@BCL@5C160C66.doc Town of Oro Valley Attorney’s Office/cs/091312
ORDINANCE NO. (O)15-05
AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA,
AMENDING THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED, CHAPTER
24 SUPPLEMENTARY DISTRICT REGULATIONS, SECTION 24.9,
ECONOMIC EXPANSION ZONE; REPEALING ALL RESOLUTIONS,
ORDINANCES AND RULES OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY IN
CONFLICT THEREWITH; PRESERVING THE RIGHTS AND DUTIES
THAT HAVE ALREADY MATURED AND PROCEEDINGS THAT HAVE
ALREADY BEGUN THEREUNDER
WHEREAS, on March 13, 1981, the Mayor and Council approved Ordinance (O)81-58, adopting
that certain document entitled “Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised” (OVZCR); and
WHEREAS,on October 3, 2012, the Mayor and Council approved Ordinance (O)12-15
adopting the creation of an Economic Expansion Zone (EEZ) overlay district; and,
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment to Section 24.9, Economic Expansion Zone, would make
the application process more efficient by incorporating the Conceptual Design Review process
into the Final Design Review; and
WHEREAS,the proposed amendment would also enable developers the ability to request
administrative review of an alternative parking ratio, which maintains the intended streamlined
process for EEZ projects; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the proposed amendments to
Section 24.9, Economic Expansion Zone at a duly noticed public hearing on January 6, 2015, in
accordance with State Statutes and recommended approval to the Town Council; and
WHEREAS,the Oro Valley Town Council has considered the proposed amendments to Section
24.9, Economic Expansion Zone and the Planning and Zoning Commission’s recommendation
and finds that they are consistent with the Town's General Plan and other Town ordinances.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro
Valley, Arizona, that:
SECTION 1. Section 24.9, Economic Expansion Zone attached hereto as Exhibit “A”, is hereby
amended with additions being shown in ALL CAPS and deletions being shown in strikethrough
text.
SECTION 3. All Oro Valley Ordinances, Resolutions, or Motions and parts of Ordinances,
Resolutions, or Motions of the Council in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are
hereby repealed.
SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is
for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent
jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof.
C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 6\@BCL@5C160C66\@BCL@5C160C66.doc Town of Oro Valley Attorney’s Office/cs090712
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 4
th
day of February, 2015.
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
Dr. Satish I. Hiremath, Mayor
ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie K. Bower, Town Clerk Tobin Sidles, Legal Services Director
Date: Date:
C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 6\@BCL@5C160C66\@BCL@5C160C66.doc Town of Oro Valley Attorney’s Office/cs090712
EXHIBIT “A”
Zoning Code Amendment
Proposed Text
Additions shown in ALL CAPS
Deletions shown in strikethrough font
Section 24.9 Economic Expansion Zone
A. Purpose
The purpose of this overlay district is to provide a streamlined review process for development in Rancho
Vistoso Neighborhood 3 (Innovation Park), thereby supporting Town economic development initiatives
while preserving and protecting the health, safety, and welfare of the community.
B. Applicability
The Economic Expansion Zone (EEZ) review process is available to all property located within the EEZ
Innovation Park Overlay District boundaries, which include Innovation Park in Rancho Vistoso
Neighborhood 3, with the exception of any property within six hundred (600) feet of Rancho Vistoso PAD
Residential Zones, as depicted in the overlay map, attached to the ordinance codified in this section.
1. The EEZ process is available to new development, or additions, expansions, or changes to
existing development proposing permitted uses and otherwise consistent with existing zoning
and development standards.
2. The provisions of this section do not apply to applications for amendments to the zoning or
planned area development standards, or applications for conditional use permits.
C. General Provisions
1. Exemption from Conceptual Design REVIEW AND Approval Process. Development
applications complying with the requirements of subsection B of this section shall be exempted
from the following requirements:
a. CDRB review and Town Council approval of conceptual site plan, conceptual
architecture, and conceptual public art, as contained in Section 22.9.A and Section
22.9.D.4.
a. THE SUBMITTAL OF CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATIONS AND
ASSOCIATED CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AND TOWN COUNCIL
REVIEW.
b. Public outreach requirements of Section 22.15.
2. Approvals Required. Development applications complying with the requirements of subsection B
of this section shall comply with the following review and approval process:
a. FINAL DESIGN REVIEW AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 22.9.
i. The form and content of all submittals shall comply with Section 22.9.D.2.
ii. The application shall be distributed for agency review consistent with Section
22.9.D.3.
iii. The review time frames shall be consistent with established review periods.
b. The Planning and Zoning Administrator shall evaluate conformance of conceptual
FINAL design review submittals to the Zoning Code, with specific emphasis on:
i. Conformance with conceptual design review principles (Section 22.9.D.5 and
Section 27.3.H).
ii. Conformance with Addendum A design standards.
c. UPON REVIEW OF FINAL DESIGN APPLICATIONS, the Planning and Zoning
Administrator shall make specific findings of compliance with applicable conceptual
design principles, Addendum A design standards, and other provisions of the Zoning
Code and shall generate a report of said findings.
d. The Planning and Zoning Administrator shall approve, disapprove or conditionally
approve the conceptual FINAL design submittal based on specific findings as outlined in
the report.
e. Conditions may be imposed in order to fully carry out the provisions and intent of the
Zoning Code.
D. UPON WRITTEN REQUEST BY THE APPLICANT, THE PLANNING AND ZONING
ADMINISTRATOR MAY APPROVE AN ALTERNATIVE PARKING RATIO, SUBJECT TO
THE REVIEW CRITERIA OUTLINED IN SECTION 27.7.C.2 OF THE ZONING CODE.
AN ALTERNATIVE PARKING RATIO SHALL NOT BE DEEMED INCONSISTENT WITH
THE ZONING CODE AS REFERENCED IN THE ABOVE SECTION 24.9.B.1.
3. Applicant Appeal of Administrative Decision
a. The approval, with or without conditions, or denial of an application shall be final unless,
within twenty (20) days from the date of the Planning and Zoning Administrator’s
decision, the applicant files an appeal in writing to the Town Clerk.
b. Such appeal shall be submitted in writing to the Town Clerk and shall indicate where, in
the opinion of the appellant, the Planning and Zoning Administrator was in error.
c. The Town Clerk shall schedule the appeal for Town Council review and the Town
Council, at its meeting, shall uphold, modify or overrule the decision.
d. The decision of the Town Council shall be final.
4. Town Council Review of Administrative Decision
a. The approval, with or without conditions, or denial of an application shall be final unless,
within twenty (20) days from the date of the Planning and Zoning Administrator’s
decision, a majority of the Town Council requests review of the Planning and Zoning
Administrator’s decision.
b. The Town Council shall have the right and prerogative to initiate its own review of any
decision of the Planning and Zoning Administrator.
c. The Town Council shall uphold, modify, or overrule the decision or may refer the
application to the Conceptual Design Review Board for their recommendation prior to
taking action.
d. Notice of Town Council-initiated review of an administrative decision shall be given to
the applicant by the Town Clerk within ten (10) days of Town Council action.
e. The decision of the Town Council shall be final.
Zoning Code Amendment
Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report
CASE NUMBER: OV714-014
MEETING DATE: January 6, 2015
AGENDA ITEM: 4
STAFF CONTACT: Rosevelt Arellano, Planner
rarellano@orovalleyaz.gov (520) 229-4817
Request: Zoning Code Amendment to Section 24.9, Economic Expansion
Zone (EEZ) Overlay District
Recommendation: Approve Zoning Code Amendment
SUMMARY:
The Economic Expansion Zone (EEZ) Overlay District was adopted in 2012, and was
intended to streamline the development in Innovation Park by enabling an administrative
review process. Since the adoption, there has been several EEZ projects which have
highlighted areas of needed improvement including: 1) Efficiency of the site plan approval
process and 2) Efficiency of the approval process for a modified number of required parking
spaces. The proposed code amendment seeks to address these issues by:
1. Eliminating the administrative review of a Conceptual Design Plan and allowing EEZ
projects to proceed to Final Design.
2. Enabling developers the ability to obtain administrative approval of an alternative
parking ratio, which is a request to provide more or less parking spaces than the
Zoning Code requires.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
The intent of the EEZ is to encourage economic development in Innovation Park by
expediting the development review and approval process. When companies are looking to
relocate or expand, they typically evaluate multiple sites in multiple jurisdictions. It is
important to position Oro Valley to be competitive as these future economic development
opportunities present themselves. The proposed amendment would improve the overall
review time of EEZ projects and help attract targeted industries.
The following is background information on the two components of the amendment.
OV714-014 Code Amendment Page 2 of 5
Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report
Conceptual and Final Design Review
The current EEZ process consists of two steps. The first step is the Conceptual Design
Review which ensures that a project’s overall design (i.e. site layout, architecture and
public art) is functional and compatible within its boundaries and the surrounding area.
Under the EEZ process, the Conceptual Design is administratively approved and does not
require the normal Conceptual Design Review Board recommendation and Town Council
approval. The second step is the Final Design Review which ensures that a project is
consistent with the approved Conceptual Design and other applicable zoning provisions.
After two years of implementing the EEZ process, it has been determined that the
information and review components of the Conceptual Design can be incorporated into a
Final Design application. This approach will eliminate one step in the process, and will
result in time efficiency and promotion of economic development within the overlay district.
Parking Standards
The current EEZ provisions do not enable developers the ability to request administrative
approval of an alternative parking ratio. An alternative parking ratio (i.e. request to propose
more or less parking spaces than required by the Zoning Code) requires Conceptual
Design Review Board approval.
Under the current code, an EEZ project which normally would be reviewed administratively,
is elevated to the Conceptual Design Review Board and Town Council based on an
alternative parking ratio request. The alternative parking ratio request is a technical
analysis which can be adequately decided by the Planning and Zoning Administrator and
maintain the intended streamlined process for project approval. Alternative parking ratio
requests will continue to require conformance with the approval criteria. The purpose of the
criteria is to ensure that an alternative parking ratio request more accurately reflects the
parking demand of the use than the current parking standards.
DISCUSSION / ANALYSIS:
Proposed Amendment
The proposed code amendment (Attachment 1) would:
1. Eliminating the administrative review of a Conceptual Design Plan and allowing EEZ
projects to proceed to Final Design.
2. Enabling developers the ability to obtain administrative approval of an alternative
parking ratio, which is a request to provide more or less parking spaces than the
Zoning Code requires.
OV714-014 Code Amendment Page 3 of 5
Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report
Zoning Amendment Analysis
The proposed amendment (Attachment 1) would make the application process more
efficient by incorporating the Conceptual Design Review process into the Final Design
Review. The proposed amendment would also enable developers the ability to request
administrative review of an alternative parking ratio, which maintains the intended
streamlined process for EEZ projects.
The following is a list of benefits related to the proposed amendment:
Benefits of Amendment
Eliminates unnecessary work and reduces the review time by 30 to 60 days.
Provides a more efficient and streamlined process.
Further enables and incentivizes the EEZ Overlay District.
Allows a more accurate number of required parking spaces based on the parking
needs of various job industries.
General Plan Conformance Analysis
Goal 3.1 To ensure long-term financial and economic sustainability for the Town of
Oro Valley.
Staff Comment: The proposed code amendment assists in attracting and retaining skilled,
professional level jobs in targeted industries. These primary jobs create
wealth for the community and have a multiplier effect by creating
additional jobs in the retail and service sector due to the increased
demand for goods and services from the income generated by primary
jobs. This contributes directly and indirectly to the economic long-term
sustainability of other sectors of the local economy, including retail,
service, and government services.
Policy 3.1.1 The Town shall ensure that future growth reflects the desires of the
community in balance with an analysis of the Town's financial needs…to
ensure that future development will complement community values and
implement the community's economic vision for the future, while maintaining
the ability of Oro Valley to attract and retain desirable businesses.
Staff Comment: The proposed amendment serves to “implement the community’s
economic vision for the future” by encouraging established Innovation
Park businesses to grow and expand while providing a desirable incentive
for new businesses to locate to Oro Valley.
Policy 3.1.2 The Town shall continue to strive for a diverse economic base that will help
reduce Oro Valley's dependence on revenues derived from growth-related
sources. Encourage and support the following types of uses as means of
diversifying the local tax base, increasing local employment opportunities,
and decreasing expenditure leakage to nearby communities.
OV714-014 Code Amendment Page 4 of 5
Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report
Staff Comment: As discussed, the creation of professional level jobs enhances the
economic stability and vitality of the community in a number of important
ways, including increasing revenue for existing retail and service
businesses.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION:
Public notice has been provided as follows:
All HOAs in the Town were notified of this hearing
Public hearing notice was posted:
o In the Territorial newspaper
o At Town hall
o On the Town website
No comments have been received to date.
SUMMARY / CONCLUSION
The proposed amendment (Attachment 1) represents a logical approach to increasing the
effectiveness of the EEZ Overlay District. The amendment will establish process
efficiencies which will maintain the original intent of the EEZ process to incentivize
economic development through a streamlined approval process.
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the following findings, the proposed amendment would enable:
A more efficient and streamlined process.
Better serve the parking needs of targeted job industries.
Further incentivize the EEZ Overlay District.
Be consistent with the intent of the EEZ Overlay District.
Meet the relevant Goals and Policies of the General Plan.
It is recommended that the Planning and Zoning Commission take the following action:
Recommend approval to the Town Council of the requested Zoning Code
Amendment OV714-014.
OV714-014 Code Amendment Page 5 of 5
Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report
SUGGESTED MOTIONS:
I move to recommend approval of the Zoning Code Amendment, based on the finding that
the request would further enable and incentivize the EEZ Overlay District, subject to the
revisions depicted in Attachment 1.
OR
I move to recommend denial of the Zoning Code Amendment, as depicted in Attachment 1,
as the request does not meet the finding that __________________________________.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Proposed Zoning Code Amendment
___________________________________________
Bayer Vella, AICP, Planning Division Manager
January 6, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 1 of 2
MINUTES
ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
REGULAR SESSION
January 6, 2015
ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE
REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER
Acting Chair Rodman called the January 6, 2015 session of the Oro Valley Planning
and Zoning Commission meeting to order at 6:00 PM.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Bill Rodman, Chairman
Bill Leedy, Vice-Chair
Greg Hitt, Commissioner
Frank Pitts, Commissioner
Tom Drazazgowski, Commissioner
Melanie Barrett, Commissioner
Charlie Hurt, Commissioner
ALSO PRESENT:
Joe Hornat, Council Member
Lou Waters, Vice-Mayor
Bayer Vella, Planning Manager
Joe Andrews, Chief Civil Deputy Attorney
David Laws, Permit Division Manager
Amanda Jacobs, Economic Development Manager
Greg Caton, Town Manager
4. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST TO AMEND SECTION 24.9, ECONOMIC
EXPANSION ZONE (EEZ), OF THE ZONING CODE TO ALLOW A MORE
EFFICIENT AND STREAMLINED PROCESS, OV714-014
Rosevelt Arellano, Planner, presented the following:
- EEZ Background
- EEZ Process Proposed Code Amendment
- Alternative Parking Ratios Existing Code
January 6, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 2 of 2
- Amendment Review
- Summary and Conclude
Chairman Rodman opened the public hearing.
Chairman Rodman closed the public hearing.
MOTION: A motion was made by Commissioner Hurt and seconded by Commissioner
Drazazgowski to recommend approval of the Zoning Code Amendment, based on the
finding that the request would further enable and incentivize the EEZ Overlay District,
subject to the revisions depicted in Attachment 1.
MOTION carried, 7-0.
PLANNING UPDATE (INFORMATIONAL ONLY)
Bayer Vella, Planning Manager, presented the following:
- Congratulation to Chairman Rodman and Vice-Chair Leedy
- Welcome new Commissioners
- Leaving of Matt Michels, Senior Planner.
- Upcoming January 7th Town Council items
- Upcoming January 21st Town Council items
- Upcoming Neighborhood meetings
ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: A motion was made by Commissioner Leedy and seconded by Commissioner
Drazazgowski to adjourn the January 6, 2015, Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting at 8:22 PM.
MOTION carried, 7-0.
Town Council Regular Session Item # 5. a.
Meeting Date:02/04/2015
Requested by: Bayer Vella
Submitted By:Michael Spaeth, Development Infrastructure Services
Department:Development Infrastructure Services
Information
SUBJECT:
RESOLUTION NO. (R)15-14, DECLARING THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 22 OF
THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE AT SECTION 22.3 AND CHAPTER 27 OF THE ORO VALLEY
ZONING CODE REVISED AT SECTION 27.10, PROVIDED HERETO AS EXHIBIT “A” WITHIN THE
ATTACHED RESOLUTION AND FILED WITH THE TOWN CLERK, A PUBLIC RECORD
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
This is a procedural item to declare the proposed code amendment a matter of public record. The
proposed code amendment has been posted online and made available in the Town Clerk's Office. If the
final versions are adopted, as approved by Town Council, they will be made available in the same
manner.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
Once adopted by Town Council, this proposed resolution will become a public record and will save the
Town on advertising costs since the Town will forgo publishing the draft ordinance in print form. The
current draft version of the proposed code amendment has been posted on the Town's website
and printed copies are available for public review in the Town Clerk's Office. Once adopted, the final
versions will be published on the Town's website.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The Town will save on advertising costs by meeting publishing requirements by reference, without
including the pages of amendments.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to (adopt or deny) Resolution No. (R)15-14, declaring the proposed amendments to Chapter 22
of the Oro Valley Zoning Code at section 22.3 and Chapter 27 of the Zoning Code at Section 27.10,
attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and filed with the Town Clerk, a public record.
Attachments
ATTACHMENT 1 - (R)15-14 Amending Chapters 22 & 27
C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 6\@BCL@2009D8B7\@BCL@2009D8B7.doc Town of Oro Valley Attorney’s Office/ca/072612
RESOLUTION NO. (R)15-14
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, DECLARING AS A PUBLIC RECORD THAT
CERTAIN DOCUMENT TO BE PLACED WITHIN CHAPTER 22,
REVIEW AND APPROVAL PROCEDURES, SECTION 22.3.D.2.b,
ENTITLED THE “TENTATIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN”AND
CHAPTER 27.10, ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE LANDS, SECTION
27.10.F.2.c ENTITLED THE “FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT”, OF THE
ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED; ATTACHED HERETO AS
EXHIBIT “A” AND FILED WITH THE TOWN CLERK
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO
VALLEY, ARIZONA, that certain document of the Oro Valley Town Code, entitled Chapter
22, Review and Approval Procedures, Section 22.3.D.2.b, entitled the “Tentative Development
Plan” and Chapter 27.10, Environmentally Sensitive Lands, Section 27.10.F.2.c entitled the
“Flexible Development” is attached hereto as Exhibit “A”, three copies of which are on file in
the Office of the Town Clerk, is hereby declared to be a public record, and said copies are
ordered to remain on file with the Town Clerk.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley,
Arizona this 4
th day of February, 2015.
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
Dr. Satish I. Hiremath, Mayor
ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie K. Bower, Town Clerk Tobin Sidles, Legal Services Director
Date: Date:
C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 6\@BCL@2009D8B7\@BCL@2009D8B7.doc Town of Oro Valley Attorney’s Office/ca/072612
EXHIBIT “A”
Section 22.3.D.2.b
b. Any proposed changes to a Tentative Development Plan approved in conjunction with a
rezoning shall be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Administrator, who shall review the
item and shall ascertain whether or not the change is significant. If a change is determined
to be significant, revised plans shall be submitted for reconsideration by both the Planning
and Zoning Commission and Town Council. A significant change shall be determined by,
but not be limited to, the following criteria:
i.Any change to the permitted use or uses. Permitted uses shall mean the primary and
alternative uses as set forth in the Tentative Development Plan and conditions
attached to the approved rezoning.
ii.Any change to the development standards or zoning conditions relating to building
heights, PERIMETER setbacks, open space requirements, any reduction in open
space, parking, floor area ratios and density.
iii.Any change to the Tentative Development Plan associated with this rezoning which
would vary any material terms or conditions of the rezoning, which would modify any
proposed density standards, any kinds of street or land improvements proposed
affecting the standards and layout for vehicular circulation, signs and nuisance
controls intended for the development.
iv.Nothing in this section shall be deemed to authorize the Planning and Zoning
Administrator to modify or approve any aspects of development reserved to the
Conceptual Design Review Board pursuant to Section 22.5.
v.CHANGES APPROVED AS FLEXIBLE DESIGN OPTIONS AS PERMITTED BY
SECTION 27.10.G.2.c SHALL BE EXEMPT.
IF A CHANGE IS DETERMINED TO BE SIGNIFICANT, REVISED PLANS SHALL BE
SUBMITTED FOR RECONSIDERATION BY BOTH THE PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION AND TOWN COUNCIL.
Section 27.10.F.2.c.i.a
a.“As part of a rezoning application, or subsequent application, THE PLANNING AND
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR MAY REVIEW AND APPROVE ALL FLEXIBLE DESIGN
OPTIONS EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING WHICH Town Council retains discretion to
enable on a cases-by-case basis”
1) SUBSECTION F.2.c.iii.a OF THIS SECTION, BUILDING SETBACK (PERIMETER)
2) SUBSECTION F.2.c.iii.b OF THIS SECTION, LANDSCAPE BUFFER YARD (WHEN
ADJOINING A RESIDENTIAL USE)
3) SUBSECTION F.2.c.iii.e OF THIS SECTION, BUILDING HEIGHT
4) SUBSECTION F.2.c.iii.f OF THIS SECTION, OPEN SPACE
5) SUBSECTION F.2.c.iii.g OF THIS SECTION, MIXED USE
C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 6\@BCL@2009D8B7\@BCL@2009D8B7.doc Town of Oro Valley Attorney’s Office/ca/072612
6) SUBSECTION F.2.c.iii.h OF THIS SECTION, MODIFIED REVIEW PROCESS
Section 27.10.F.2.c.i.c – NEW SECTION
c.“APPEAL. ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS OF FLEXIBLE DESIGN OPTIONS MAY BE
APPEALED IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER:”
1) “THE APPROVAL OR DENIAL BY TOWN STAFF OF AN APPLICATION SHALL BE
FINAL UNLESS, WITHIN TWENTY (20) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF STAFF’S
DECISION, THE APPLICANT FILES AN APPEAL IN WRITING TO THE TOWN
COUNCIL. SUCH APPEAL SHALL BE IN WRITING IN CARE OF THE TOWN
CLERK AND SHALL INDICATE WHERE, IN THE OPINION OF THE APPELLANT,
TOWN STAFF WAS IN ERROR. THE TOWN CLERK SHALL SCHEDULE THE
APPEAL FOR TOWN COUNCIL REVIEW AND THE TOWN COUNCIL, AT ITS
MEETING, SHALL UPHOLD, MODIFY OR OVERRULE THE DECISION TOWN
STAFF. THE DECISION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL SHALL BE FINAL.”
2) “THE TOWN COUNCIL SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT AND PREROGATIVE TO
INITIATE ITS OWN REVIEW OF ANY DECISION OF TOWN STAFF AND SHALL
UPHOLD, MODIFY OR OVERRULE SAID DECISION. COUNCIL SHALL HAVE
TWENTY (20) DAYS TO INITIATE A REVIEW AND THE APPLICANT SHALL BE
NOTIFIED.”
Section 27.10.F.2.c.iii.h
“Modified Review Process. Site Plans and preliminary plats submitted in SUBSTANTIAL
conformance with the approved Tentative Development Plan, as determined by the
Planning and Zoning Administrator, may be administratively approved. ANY PROPOSED
CHANGES TO A TENTATIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN MUST BE ADMINISTERED AS
SPECIFIED IN SECTION 22.3.D.2.b., EXCEPT 22.3.D.2.b.iv.”
Town Council Regular Session Item # 5. b.
Meeting Date:02/04/2015
Requested by: Bayer Vella
Submitted By:Michael Spaeth, Development Infrastructure Services
Department:Development Infrastructure Services
Information
SUBJECT:
PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE NO. (O)15-06, AMENDING SECTION 22.3.D.2.b AND SECTION
27.10.F.2.c., TO AMEND THE APPROVAL PROCESS FOR ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE LANDS
FLEXIBLE DESIGN OPTIONS, ALLOW FOR ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL OF
NON-SUBSTANTIAL CHANGES TO A TENTATIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN UNDER A MODIFIED
REVIEW PROCESS AND AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 22.3.D.2.b TO CLARIFY WHAT TENTATIVE
DEVELOPMENT PLAN CHANGES ARE CONSIDERED SIGNIFICANT
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission has recommended approval of the proposed code amendment to
allow for administrative approval of non-substantial changes to a Tentative Development Plan under a
modified review process and amendments to Section 22.3.D.2.b to clarify what Tentative Development
Plan changes are considered significant.
After the Planning and Zoning Commission recommendation, staff learned of other potential
improvements as part of Town Council review of an application, Meritage On Naranja, to allow
administrative approval of Flexible Design Options that do not impact neighborhood compatibility.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The Environmentally Sensitive Lands section of the Zoning Code enables a number of Flexible Design
Options designed to increase the amount of open space and balance the set aside of conserved
environmental resources. A recent rezoning for a site adjacent to Ironwood High School, owned by the
Kai family, illuminated the need for increased flexibility to make this system work effectively.
The proposed code amendment (Attachment 1, Exhibit "A") is intended to:
Grant administrative approval of Flexible Design Options that will not impact neighborhood
compatibility.
1.
Provide administrative approval of limited changes to Tentative Development Plans approved as
part of a rezoning under a modified review process.
2.
Modify existing criteria to clarify what constitutes a significant change to a Tentative Development
Plan for all rezonings.
3.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
Zoning Code Amendment Analysis
Zoning Code Amendment Analysis
The proposed amendment (Attachment 1) has three (3) components and would enable the following:
Administrative approval of select Flexible Design OptionsI.
The Environmentally Sensitive Lands section of the Zoning Code requires varying levels of open space
and development standards aimed at conserving environmental, scenic and cultural resources. A system
of incentives was developed to increase the amount of preserved conservation resources while
maintaining the development potential of property owners/developers.
Some of the incentives are known as Flexible Design Options and may be utilized as part of a rezoning,
subdivision plat or site plan review process. Currently, the Zoning Code requires Town Council approval
on a case-by-case basis for all Flexible Design Options requested as part of a rezoning application. The
first component of the proposed amendment will allow for administrative approval of the Flexible Design
Options that will have the least impact on neighboring property owners. The amendment would allow the
following Flexible Design Options to be approved administratively by the Planning and Zoning
Administrator:
Building Setbacks (Internal setbacks only; may not be reduced to less than 5 feet for small lots or
less than/equal to 20% of the required setback for large lots)
Landscape Buffer Yards (Buffer yards not adjoining a residential use; may not be reduced below 10
feet)
Minimum Lot Size
Off-street Parking
Recreation Area Credit
Native Vegetation Preservation
The following Flexible Design Options would still require Town Council approval:
Building setbacks (Perimeter building setbacks; may not be reduced to less than 5 feet for small
lots and less than/equal to 20% of the required setback for large lots)
Landscape Buffer Yards (Buffer yards adjoining residential development. May not be reduced to
less than 10 feet)
Building Height (For single-family attached and multi-family dwelling types may not be increased
more than 13 feet)
Open Space
Mixed Use
Modified Review Process
All applications requesting use of the Flexible Design Options would still require conformance with the
review criteria in Section 27.10.F.2.c.ii. Increasing the number of Flexible Design Options that could be
approved administratively will result in providing appropriate credit for open space conservation.
Administrative approval of limited changes to the Tentative Development Plan as part of Modified
Review Process
II.
The second component of the proposed amendment is specific to the modified review process. The
modified review process, if enabled by Town Council, allows for an applicant to bypass the Conceptual
Site Plan process and proceed directly to the Final Site Plan process which is reviewed and approved
administratively, provided it conforms to the rezoning-related Tentative Development Plan.
A recent case, known as Meritage On Naranja, demonstrates the need for the Planning and Zoning
Administrator to administratively approve “non-significant” changes to Final Site Plans that otherwise
conform to an approved Tentative Development Plan under a modified review process. During the
preparation of the Final Site Plan, the applicant was asked to accommodate a neighboring property
owner to allow a sewer connection to the property. A few lots needed to be adjusted to account for the
new sewer connection, though the total number of lots, lot configuration and roadway circulation were not
significantly altered. The minor reconfiguration necessitated reconsideration of the Final Site Plan by
Town Council on more than one occasion.
III. Tentative Development Plan Changes
The third component of the amendment would clarify what type of Tentative Development Plan changes
are considered “significant” in accordance with Section 22.3.D.2.b. Specifically, the amendment would
clarify that internal setbacks to the minimum permitted by the Zoning Code would not be considered
significant for all rezoning applications and could therefore be administratively approved.
The amendment further provides an additional criteria for determining significance by exempting changes
approved as Flexible Design Options from these criteria.
General Plan Conformance
This amendment was reviewed for conformance with the Vision, Goals and Policies of the General Plan,
specifically references to conservation and the protection of open space. The Planning and Zoning
Commission found the proposed code amendment consistent with the General Plan Vision, Goals and
Policies and a more detailed analysis is provided in the Planning and Zoning Commission staff report
(Attachment 2).
Public Participation
Public notice has been provided as follows:
All HOAs in the Town were notified of this hearing
Public hearing notice was posted:
In the Territorial newspaper
At Town Hall
On the Town website
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this application on December 2, 2014
and requested the following revision: changes to internal setbacks and those approved as part of a
Flexible Design Option should not be considered “significant”. The proposed code amendment has been
improved accordingly.
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to adopt Ordinance No. (O)15-06, amending the approval process for Environmentally
Sensitive Lands Flexible Design Options, allowing for administrative approval of non-substantial design
changes as part of the ESL modified review process and clarifying what constitutes a "significant
change" as indicated in Attachment 1, Exhibit A.
OR
I MOVE to deny Ordinance No. (O)15-06, providing for an amendments to the Zoning Code, based on
the finding that __________________________________.
Attachments
ATTACHMENT 1 - (O)15-06 Amending ESL Approval Process
ATTACHMENT 2 - PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
ATTACHMENT 3 - PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES
ORDINANCE NO. (O)15-06
AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA,
AMENDING CHAPTER 22, REVIEW AND APPROVAL PROCEDURES,
SECTION 22.3.D.2.b, AND CHAPTER 27.10, ENVIRONMENTALLY
SENSITIVE LANDS, SECTION 27.10.F.2.c, OF THE ORO VALLEY
ZONING CODE REVISED; REPEALING ALL RESOLUTIONS,
ORDINANCES AND RULES OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY IN
CONFLICT THEREWITH; PRESERVING THE RIGHTS AND DUTIES
THAT HAVE ALREADY MATURED AND PROCEEDINGS THAT HAVE
ALREADY BEGUN THEREUNDER
WHEREAS, on March 13, 1981, the Mayor and Council approved Ordinance (O)81-58, which
adopted that certain document entitled “Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised (OVZCR); and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to revise Chapter 22, Review and Approval Procedures, Section
22.3.D.2.b and Chapter 27.10, Environmentally Sensitive Lands, Section 27.10 F.2.c., to (1)
amend the approval process for Environmentally Sensitive Lands Flexible Design Options, (2)
allow for administrative approval of non-substantial changes to a Tentative Development Plan
under a modified review process and (3) clarify what Tentative Development Plan changes are
considered significant; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a meeting on December 2, 2014, and
voted to recommend approval of amending Chapter 22, Review and Approval Procedures,
Section 22.3.D.2.b and Chapter 27.10, Environmentally Sensitive Lands, Section 27.10 F.2.c.iii;
and
WHEREAS,the Mayor and Council have considered the proposed amendments to Chapter 22,
Review and Approval Procedures, Section 22.3.D.2.b and Chapter 27.10, Environmentally
Sensitive Lands, Section 27.10 F.2.c.iii and finds that they are consistent with the Town's General
Plan and other Town ordinances and are in the best interest of the Town.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of
Oro Valley that:
SECTION 1.that certain document entitled Chapter 22, Review and Approval Procedures,
Section 22.3.D.2.b and Chapter 27.10, Environmentally Sensitive Lands, Section 27.10 F.2.c.iii,
of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised, attached hereto as Exhibit “A”, to (1) amend the
approval process for Environmentally Sensitive Lands Flexible Design Options, (2) allow for
administrative approval of non-substantial changes to a Tentative Development Plan under a
modified review process and (3) clarify what Tentative Development Plan changes are
considered significant is hereby approved.
SECTION 2.All Oro Valley ordinances, resolutions or motions and parts of ordinances,
resolutions or motions of the Council in conflict with the provision of this Ordinance are hereby
repealed.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 4th
day of February, 2015.
2
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
Dr. Satish I. Hiremath, Mayor
ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie K. Bower, Town Clerk Tobin Sidles, Legal Services Director
Date: Date:
3
EXHIBIT “A”
Section 22.3.D.2.b
b. Any proposed changes to a Tentative Development Plan approved in conjunction with a
rezoning shall be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Administrator, who shall review the
item and shall ascertain whether or not the change is significant. If a change is determined
to be significant, revised plans shall be submitted for reconsideration by both the Planning
and Zoning Commission and Town Council. A significant change shall be determined by,
but not be limited to, the following criteria:
i.Any change to the permitted use or uses. Permitted uses shall mean the primary and
alternative uses as set forth in the Tentative Development Plan and conditions
attached to the approved rezoning.
ii.Any change to the development standards or zoning conditions relating to building
heights, PERIMETER setbacks, open space requirements, any reduction in open
space, parking, floor area ratios and density.
iii.Any change to the Tentative Development Plan associated with this rezoning which
would vary any material terms or conditions of the rezoning, which would modify any
proposed density standards, any kinds of street or land improvements proposed
affecting the standards and layout for vehicular circulation, signs and nuisance
controls intended for the development.
iv.Nothing in this section shall be deemed to authorize the Planning and Zoning
Administrator to modify or approve any aspects of development reserved to the
Conceptual Design Review Board pursuant to Section 22.5.
v.CHANGES APPROVED AS FLEXIBLE DESIGN OPTIONS AS PERMITTED BY
SECTION 27.10.G.2.c SHALL BE EXEMPT.
IF A CHANGE IS DETERMINED TO BE SIGNIFICANT, REVISED PLANS SHALL BE
SUBMITTED FOR RECONSIDERATION BY BOTH THE PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION AND TOWN COUNCIL.
Section 27.10.F.2.c.i.a
a.“As part of a rezoning application, or subsequent application, THE PLANNING AND
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR MAY REVIEW AND APPROVE ALL FLEXIBLE DESIGN
OPTIONS EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING WHICH Town Council retains discretion to
enable on a cases-by-case basis”
1) SUBSECTION F.2.c.iii.a OF THIS SECTION, BUILDING SETBACK (PERIMETER)
2) SUBSECTION F.2.c.iii.b OF THIS SECTION, LANDSCAPE BUFFER YARD
(WHEN ADJOINING A RESIDENTIAL USE)
3) SUBSECTION F.2.c.iii.e OF THIS SECTION, BUILDING HEIGHT
4) SUBSECTION F.2.c.iii.f OF THIS SECTION, OPEN SPACE
5) SUBSECTION F.2.c.iii.g OF THIS SECTION, MIXED USE
6) SUBSECTION F.2.c.iii.h OF THIS SECTION, MODIFIED REVIEW PROCESS
Section 27.10.F.2.c.i.c – NEW SECTION
4
c.“APPEAL. ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS OF FLEXIBLE DESIGN OPTIONS MAY BE
APPEALED IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER:”
1) “THE APPROVAL OR DENIAL BY TOWN STAFF OF AN APPLICATION SHALL BE
FINAL UNLESS, WITHIN TWENTY (20) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF STAFF’S
DECISION, THE APPLICANT FILES AN APPEAL IN WRITING TO THE TOWN
COUNCIL. SUCH APPEAL SHALL BE IN WRITING IN CARE OF THE TOWN
CLERK AND SHALL INDICATE WHERE, IN THE OPINION OF THE APPELLANT,
TOWN STAFF WAS IN ERROR. THE TOWN CLERK SHALL SCHEDULE THE
APPEAL FOR TOWN COUNCIL REVIEW AND THE TOWN COUNCIL, AT ITS
MEETING, SHALL UPHOLD, MODIFY OR OVERRULE THE DECISION TOWN
STAFF. THE DECISION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL SHALL BE FINAL.”
2) “THE TOWN COUNCIL SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT AND PREROGATIVE TO
INITIATE ITS OWN REVIEW OF ANY DECISION OF TOWN STAFF AND SHALL
UPHOLD, MODIFY OR OVERRULE SAID DECISION. COUNCIL SHALL HAVE
TWENTY (20) DAYS TO INITIATE A REVIEW AND THE APPLICANT SHALL BE
NOTIFIED.”
Section 27.10.F.2.c.iii.h
“Modified Review Process. Site Plans and preliminary plats submitted in SUBSTANTIAL
conformance with the approved Tentative Development Plan, as determined by the
Planning and Zoning Administrator, may be administratively approved. ANY PROPOSED
CHANGES TO A TENTATIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN MUST BE ADMINISTERED AS
SPECIFIED IN SECTION 22.3.D.2.b., EXCEPT 22.3.D.2.b.iv.”
ESL Modified Review Process Code Amendment
Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report
CASE NUMBER: OV714-011
MEETING DATE: December 2, 2014
AGENDA ITEM: 1
STAFF CONTACT: Michael Spaeth, Senior Planner
mspaeth@orovalleyaz.gov (520) 229-4812
Request: Zoning Code Amendment to Section 27.10, Environmentally Sensitive
Lands of the Zoning Code to allow limited changes to a Tentative
Development Plan to be administered as provided in Section 22.3.D.2.b.i
through section 22.3.D.2.b.iii.
Recommendation: Recommend approval
SUMMARY:
The Environmentally Sensitive Lands section of the Zoning Code enables a number of
incentives designed to increase the amount of conserved environmental resources while
preserving development potential for owners/developers. One of the incentives, a modified
review process, enables an expedited plan review. The expedited review allows an applicant
the ability to receive administrative approval of their site plan.
Currently, the code requires the Final Site Plan to be conformance with the approved Tentative
Development Plan. This is a higher standard than a rezoning case not involving the
Environmentally Sensitive Lands modified review process.
Minor changes require reconsideration of the Tentative Development Plan by Town Council. A
recent case has illuminated the need for discretion when evaluating minor changes. The Town
Council initiated this code amendment on October 15, 2014.
The proposed code amendment proposes to utilize the existing Tentative Development Plan
criteria to determine what changes are non-significant and therefore could be administratively
approved by the Planning and Zoning Administrator.
BACKGROUND:
Modified Review Process
The ESL section of the Zoning Code requires varying levels of open space and
development standards aimed at conserving environmental, scenic and cultural
ESL Modified Review Process Code Amendment Page 2 of 6
Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report
resources. A system of incentives was developed to lessen impacts to property
owners/developers and offsets the effects of the regulations.
One incentive in particular provides for a modified review process at Town Council's
discretion for rezoning applications. If enabled, it allows for an applicant to bypass the
Conceptual Site Plan process and proceed directly to the Final Site Plan process which is
reviewed and approved administratively, provided it conforms to the rezoning-related
Tentative Development Plan.
A recent case, known as Meritage on Naranja, demonstrates the need for the Planning
and Zoning Administrator ability to administratively approve “non-significant” changes to
Final Site Plans that otherwise conform to an approved Tentative Development Plan
under the modified review process.
During the preparation of the Final Site Plan, the applicant was asked to accommodate a
neighboring property owner to allow a sewer connection to the property. A few lots
needed to be adjusted to account for the new sewer connection , though the total number
of lots overall, lot configuration and roadway circulation was not significantly altered. The
revised Final Site Plan was reconsidered and approved by Town Council in September,
2014. The additional Town Council hearing resulted in a delay for the applicant and Town
Council directed staff to pursue an amendment to the modified review process in October,
2014.
DISCUSSION / ANALYSIS:
Zoning Code Amendment Analysis
The proposed amendment (Attachment 1) will enable the Planning and Zoning Administrator
the ability to administratively approve limited changes to Tentative Development Plans
approved as part of a rezoning when the applicant has been granted use of the modified
review process. The code amendment utilizes 3 of the existing criteria established in Section
22.3.D.2.b of the Zoning Code as the defining criteria for proposed changes.
Section 22.3 - Tentative Development Plans
Currently, the Zoning Code allows for administrative approval by the Planning and Zoning
Administrator of changes to Tentative Development Plans determined to be “non -
significant”. Section 22.3.D.2.b of the Zoning Code establishes criteria for Tentative
Development Plan changes when the Environmentally Sensitive Lands modified review
process is not utilized. The 3 criteria to be utilized by the proposed code amendment
(22.3.D.2.b.i - 22.3.D.2.biii) is summarized below:
Section 22.3.D.2.b
b. A significant change shall be determined by, but not be limited to, the following
criteria:
ESL Modified Review Process Code Amendment Page 3 of 6
Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report
Changes to permitted use(s) or conditions associated with a
permitted use(s)
Changes to development standards or zoning conditions, including:
o Building heights
o Setbacks
o Open space requirements
o Parking
o Floor Area Ratio or density
Changes to terms or conditions of the rezoning affecting density
standards, changes to street or land improvements affect circulation,
or changes to signs and nuisance controls for the development
The code amendment does not utilize the fourth existing criteria in Section 22.3.D.2.b
listed below:
“Nothing in this section shall be deemed to authorize the Planning and Zoning
Administrator to modify or approve any aspects of development reserved to the
Conceptual Design Review Board pursuant to Section 22.5.”
The modified review process allows administrative approval of site plans and does not
require review by the Conceptual Design Review Board.
General Plan Conformance
The Zoning Code Amendment was reviewed for conformance with the Vision, Goals and
Policies of the General Plan. Listed below is a summary of the applicable Goals and
Policies in italics, followed by staff commentary:
Goal 1.1 To preserve Oro Valley’s natural Sonoran Desert environment and
the scenic resources that are an important part of the community’s
quality of life.
Goal 11.1 To protect the environmentally sensitive open space areas within the
Planning Area.
Staff Comment
The flexible design options enabled by ESL are intended to incentivize the conservation
of natural open space and other significant resources. The modified review process
serves as one of these incentives aimed at protecting and preserving more natural open
space while preserving the development potential for the applicant. The proposed code
amendment will increase the effectiveness of this flexible design option and is consistent
with these General Plan Goals.
ESL Modified Review Process Code Amendment Page 4 of 6
Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION:
Public notice has been provided as follows:
All HOAs in the Town were notified of this hearing
Public hearing notice was posted:
o In the Territorial newspaper
o At Town hall
o On the Town website
The proposed code amendment has been distributed to key members of the development
community who frequently work with Town. Ms. Keri Silvyn stated her support for the
proposed code amendment. Mr. Paul Oland in dicated more discretion was needed on
behalf of the Planning and Zoning Administrator.
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the following findings:
The proposed amendment would allow the Planning and Zoning Administrator the
ability to administratively approve limited changes and provides the needed
flexibility for Tentative Development Plans approved as part of a rezoning when the
applicant has been granted use of the modified review process.
The proposal is consistent with the relevant Goals and Policies of the General
Plan.
The proposed amendment utilizes existing Tentative Development Plan
criteria for proposed changes which establishes functional limits to what can
be approved administratively.
It is recommended that the Planning and Zoning Commission take the following action:
Recommend approval to the Town Council of the requested Zoning Code Amendment
OV714-011
SUGGESTED MOTIONS:
The Planning and Zoning Commission may wish to consider the following suggested motion:
I move to recommend approval of th e Zoning Code Amendment in Attachment 1, related to the
modified review process, based on the findings in the staff report.
OR
I move to recommend denial of the Zoning Code Amendment in Attachment 1, related to the
modified review process, as the request does not meet the finding that
__________________________________.
ESL Modified Review Process Code Amendment Page 5 of 6
Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Proposed Code Amendment
___________________________________________
Bayer Vella, Interim Planning Manager
Attachment 1
Proposed Code Language
Planning and Zoning Commission
December 2, 2014
Section 27.10.F.2.c.iii.h
“Modified Review Process. Site Plans and preliminary plats submitted in
SUBSTANTIAL conformance with the approved Tentative Development Plan, as
determined by the Planning and Zoning Administrator, may be administratively
approved. ANY PROPOSED CHANGES TO A TENTATIVE DEVELOPMENT
PLAN MUST BE ADMINISTERED AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 22.3.D.2.b.i, ii and
iii.”
MINUTES
ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
REGULAR/STUDY SESSION
December 2, 2014
ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE
REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Cox called the December 2, 2014 session of the Oro Valley Planning and Zoning
Commission Regular Session to order at 6:00 PM.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Don Cox, Chairman
John Buette, Vice-Chairman
Greg Hitt, Commissioner
Bill Rodman, Commissioner
Bill Leedy, Commissioner
Frank Pitts, Commissioner
Tom Drazazgowski, Commissioner
ALSO PRESENT:
Joe Hornat, Council Member
Council Liaison Lou Waters, Vice - Mayor
Bayer Vella, Interim Planning Manager
Joe Andrews, Chief Civil Deputy Attorney
David Laws, Permit Division Manager
Chuck King, Inspection Division Manager
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Chairman Cox led the Planning and Zoning Commission members and audience in the Pledge of
Allegiance.
3. PUBLIC HEARING: A ZONING CODE TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE MODIFIED
REVIEW PROCESS ENABLED BY THE ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE LANDS
SECTION OF THE ZONING CODE. THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO SECTION
27.10.D.3.F.2.ii.h WOULD ALLOW LIMITED CHANGES TO A TENTATIVE
DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO BE ADMINISTERED AS PROVIDED IN SECTION
22.3.D.2.b.i THROUGH SECTION 22.3.D.2.b.iii., OV714-011
Staff Report and Attachment 1 - Proposed Code Amendment
Michael Spaeth, Senior Planner, presented the following:
- Modified Review Process
- Conservation Subdivision Design
- Existing Criteria for revised Tentative Development Plan
- Proposed Code Amendment
Chairman Cox opened the public hearing.
Jeff Grobstein, Oro Valley resident, stated he is in favor this zoning code text amendment.
Paul Oland, Non-Oro Valley resident, commented that the language helps clarify issues that have
come up in the past.. Setbacks are something the Planning Director should have the ability to
adjust according to the clustered lot size. Mr. Oland suggested adding the word "perimeter"
before the word "setback".
Chairman Cox closed the public hearing.
MOTION: A motion was made by Commissioner Leedy and seconded by Commissioner
Drazazgowski to Recomend Approval of the Zoning Code Amendment in Attachment 1, related
to the modified review process, based on the findings in the staff report with a modification of
adding the word "perimeter" before the word "setbacks".
Attachment 1
Proposed Code Language
Planning and Zoning Commission
December 2, 2014
Section 27.10.F.2.c.iii.h
“Modified Review Process. Site Plans and preliminary plats submitted in
SUBSTANTIAL conformance with the approved Tentative Development Plan, as determined by
the Planning and Zoning Administrator, may be administratively approved. ANY PROPOSED
CHANGES TO A TENTATIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN MUST BE ADMINISTERED AS
SPECIFIED IN SECTION 22.3.D.2.b.i, ii and iii.”
i. Any change to the permitted use or uses. Permitted uses shall mean the primary and
alternative uses as set forth in the Tentative Development Plan and conditions attached to the
approved rezoning.
ii. Any change to the development standards or zoning conditions relating to building heights,
PERIMETER setbacks, open space requirements, any reduction in open space, parking, floor
area ratios and density.
iii. Any change to the Tentative Development Plan associated with this rezoning which would
vary any material terms or conditions of the rezoning, which would modify any proposed density
standards, any kinds of street or land improvements proposed affecting the standards and layout
for vehicular circulation, signs and nuisance controls intended for the development.
MOTION carried, 7-0.
ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: A motion was made by Commissioner Rodman and seconded by Commissioner
Leedy to adjourn the Planning and Zoning Study Session at 9:11 PM.
MOTION carried, 7-0.
Town Council Regular Session Item # 6.
Meeting Date:02/04/2015
Requested by: Bayer Vella
Submitted By:Rosevelt Arellano
Development Infrastructure Services
Department:Development Infrastructure Services
Information
SUBJECT:
REVISION TO THE STONE CANYON II FINAL PLAT FOR LOT 167 AT 1055 W. TORTOLITA
MOUNTAIN DRIVE WITHIN RANCHO VISTOSO, NEIGHBORHOOD 11 BY REMOVING
THE DESIGNATED "NO-BUILD AREA" AND ALLOWING ENCROACHMENT INTO 25% OR GREATER
SLOPES
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the request to remove the currently designated "no build area" and allow
encroachment into 25% or greater slopes within the area depicted in Attachment 1.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Within many of the Stone Canyon residential lots, "no build areas" were established on various final plats
in order to ensure protection of rock outcrops and areas of 25% or greater slope. The aim was to
foster environmental conservation with the aim of carefully nestling home sites into each lot. At the time
of approval, there was recognition via a note on the final plat that a lot-by-lot review would be needed
to finalize specific building area or "envelopes."
In July 2013, the Town received a request to remove the "no build area" and encroach into 25% slopes
on lot 167 within Stone Canyon II (Attachment 2). The original request was incorrectly approved by Town
staff and subsequently rescinded. The owner of lot 167, John Runewicz, has requested Town Council
approval of a revised application.
The opportunity to build a home on this site is significantly constrained by the topography and
drainage. Furthermore, the currently designated "no build area" does not include special environmentally
resource value as intended. The adjacent property owner (lots 168 and 169), however, is concerned
about view impacts if a building were to be placed within this area. Impacts are significantly mitigated
due to the low profile of the proposed home.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
The "no build area" on this plat does not include significant environment resources such as rock outcrops
or severely angled slopes. Furthermore, the area proposed for building is the most suitable for
construction on this site due to the presence of a wash at the front and other topographic features.
The "no build area" does include 25% or greater slope (Attachment 3); however, a site visit reveals that it
does not represent a significant ridge line. The Rancho Visotoso Planned Area Development (PAD)
permits Town Council review of requests to building in such areas as follows:
"Development in areas in Rancho Vistoso PAD that have naturally occurring slopes 25% and greater is
generally prohibited, but limited encroachment may be allowed under the following criteria:
5. Minor encroachments of up to 10% of the gradable area are allowed, with a trade area, for
development plans with Town Council approval."
The plat enables grading up to 20,000 s.f. (excluding driveway), so Town Council has discretion to
enable up to 2,000 s.f. of encroachment into 25% slopes with a suitable trade area. The applicant is
requesting 1,969.34 s.f. of encroachment and a trade area of 4,522.77 s.f. as represented in Attachment
1.
The adjoining property owner of lots 168 and 169, the Merens, are concerned their views will be
compromised. View impacts are mitigated for the following reasons:
Per the applicant, the building height to the main parapet (roof) is 16' and an architectural feature
extends upward to 17' (Attachment 4). It is important to note that zoning allows a maximum building
height of 30' and two (2) stories.
The home will be positioned into the hillside.
The building pad is at a lower elevation than the Merens'.
The applicant changed the architectural design to use a flat roof instead of a pitched one.
The driveway has been moved further away from the Merens' property than previous.
Recently, Town staff facilitated a meeting between John Runewicz and the legal representative of the
Merens. Both the Merens and the Stone Canyon homeowners association have been apprised of the
Town Council meeting date.
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I move to approve OV1215-004, revision to the Stone Canyon II final plat for lot 167 by removing and
replacing the "no build area" and permitting encroachment into 25% or greater slopes as indicated in
Attachment 1.
Attachments
Attachment 1,
Attachment 2, Stone Canyon II plat
Attachment 3, 25% or greater slopes
Attachment 4, Home elevations
/
/
/
104.29
79.10
/
/
/
/
/
-.
~/
/
/
/"H
---
SCALE 1'=40'
S89" 57 20 W 216.73
AREA OF PLATTED NO BUILD AREA = 3,565.56 SF
AREA OF NEW TRADE LOCATION = 4,522.77 SF
TRADE AREA DISPLA Y
LOT 16-7 STONE CANYON /I
BOOK 53} PAGE 48 SEQ# 20000630042
1055 VI. TDRTDLIT A MOUNTAIN DRIVE
.. "
• •
"-
",,,
"'~ "'~ '"
,", ..
"-
~!~ -.' ~I:!:;
~
z ,,,
0 <>: 0"" ~o..
9 .L33HS 33S
"" " "C" M"-~O~O-B-L
~
{l
°M-DOOl
J.~;~
0<'<1:,;",
~ ,~ ".
"M -OOOl
c:o lII::l
CO ;:'~
~
~~
"'
"'"' "~
'" •
~,
~'
I Ie
j
c::::::J
SCALE 1'=20'
20' 20' 20'
EXISllNG CONTOUR INTERVAL=2'
PROPOSED CONTOUR IN lERVAL=1 '
SILT FENCE
STANDARD GRADING NOTES
1. CUT = 1.050 CY 1 FILL = 995 CY
2. BASIS OF BEARINGSI BEARINGS BASED ON DOCKET 8178, PAGE 1966
CENTERLINE OF RANCHO VISTDSD BOULDEVARD, SAID BEARING
BEING S32'09'01'E
3. BASIS OF ELEVATION' ADOT DATUM BENCHMARK] BRASS DISK HEADW'ALL
70' RIGHT OF STATION 710 +20 APPROXIMATELY 300' SOUTH OF THE NORTH
1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 5, T-11 -S, R-14-E, ELEVATION = 2688,03
4 . UNIMPROVED DISTURBED AREAS RESULTING FROM
OPERATIONS ON THIS LOT SHALL BE RESTORED TO THEIR
NATURAL STATE BY UTILIZING DROUGHT-RESISTANT
VEGETATION AS STATED BY THE TDW'N OF ORO VAL LEY
ZON IN G CODE. ALL UTILITY TRE NCHES AND/OR LEACH
FIELDS ARE TO BE RESTORED TO THEIR OR IG INAL NA TURAL
CONDITIONS.
5. EXCESS SOIL GENERATED FROM EARTHW'ORK OPERATIONS
SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND LAW'FULL Y
DISPOSED OF DR, IF ALL OW'ED AND APPROV ED BY THE TO'w'N
ENGINEER, SITE MATERIALS MAY BE PLACED SO AS TO
BECOME AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE SITE DEVELOPMENT, ALL
IN ACCORDANCE 'w'ITH THE HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
l£Jill1I)
rn EXIST PHONE PEDESTAL
• EXIST. TRANSFORMER
~ EXIST. CABLE PEDESTAL
• EXIST. 'w'ATER METER
• EXIST. GAS HOOKUP
® DECO BLOCK ORAIN OPENING
(4) INVER T OUT 3040.10
1:::::::::::::::::::":1 AREA GRADED 'w'ITHN 25/0 OR GREATER SLOPES
5 /0 FOR
,-fIRST 10' FROM l I STRUCTURE
6. ALL ROOF DRAINAGE 'w'ILL BE CONTROLLED BY SPLASH PADS
AND lOR RIVER ROCK. TYPICAL GRADING AROUND HOUSE
•. , ___ ... __ .. ".. __ ,r __ ...
~-...::-_-.: '.:.":. ".!:!".:::: =':::""~" .:-:w _ ... "-_ ...... -_.""----.. __ .. __ .. _--_ ... -
;:,.-=.:.':.:"' .. ----_ ..... _--== ":.:;t~ ,_.....,. ... __ ......... 1_<--1 ,_ ........ ___ I-.J , __ =
... __ .. _--_. __ ... -___ 00 __ -
OESCRIPTIOH
" TD.IPORAA'Y BARRIER or G(omml£ FABRIC (FLTER GI.OIH) USEO
TO IHTERCEPr 5IllIMENf L>IJ(}j RUNOfF fROY SMAll. DRAlNNiE AA£AS
WITH CMsTURBED SIlL.
~,
DO NOT IN STill SEDIMENT FDIC[ ACROSS INTrnlollTT[N'T OR
pm~ENf STREA\IS , ~NEI.S . OR /OIff LOC:ATION WHERE
CClHCENlRATED fLOW IS otJffiClI'AlED.
IIIST,ou.o.TlO~ OFT.o.Jl.~
1. !.flClill; Tl£ S ILT !'[NeE AT LfI\S'T 10 fE[f FllOIol TliE TOE Of
STEEl' SlOES mo NEAALY I..E\IEl. THRIJUGIlOUT IfS lDIClll.
2. [)I[l " TII~ 1J'!'ROXI~ID.Y 6 INCHES DEEP AND 4 INCHES W!OC. OR A V-fflENCII, IN ntE UNE OF TIlE fElICE.
J. 0Ar.rE POSTS SEI:UREl.Y AT l£OST IS INCHES ItmI THE GROUIID
ON 1HE IXlWHSLDPE SIDE OF TRENCH . SP.Oa: POSTS A IIAXIWllII 01'
10 FlIT M'Mff IF FEHCE IS SUPPORTED Ill' WIRE: B FEET F EXTRA
!mIENc:TH F.o.BRlC IS USED 'IIffifOUT SlIPPORT 'MR£.
f.DJUST SP...oNG TO PlACE POSTS AT LOW POWTS AI.DNG THE
FDlCEUNE.
4. FfoSI[N SLIf'!'ORT WIR£ FENCE 10 UPSlOPE SIDE OF POSTS,
ElCTO/O ING B ,"eKES lmo TIlE TIIENCH. ATTN:)1 CONlHflJOUS
lDIClll OF f.o.Bll iC TO UPSLOPE SIDE Of FENCE POSTS. AVOO
Jelrm;, PNmCI.lNlLY AT LOW 1'OIrm; I N lHE fENCE UNE. WHERE
JClI(J'S AAE m:CES~, FoISIDI F,lBfIIC SECURELY Ttl SUPPORT
f'OSlS ..... D ~ Ttl ~E NEXT POST.
~. IUCf.: ~E F,lBRK: IN THE TREHCII so THE lI01TO ili I'OUlS
ACROSS ltI( ~ OF lIIE TRENCH. ~E EI'O(F)LL IN lI1E
TRENCH (NUl ~E FABRIC Ttl ~E GROl!NIJUHE ..... 0 CO illP.ocr WITH A
POWER TAMPER.
~~,
1. INSPECT SEDlIolEUT f"EHCES PERIOIlICOliY ..... 1) KT(R fACH
RAINFALl. MNT.
2. SHOOLD fHlRK: TEAA. DECOIolPOSE. 00 IN IoH"( WAY BECOIolE
IN EffECTIVE. REPLACE IT lIoIiIIED"'lEl.Y.
,. REl«NE SEDliIIENf DEPosm; PROWILY Ttl PROVIDE AOCOOATE
STOfWlE VOlU ili E FUR ~E NEXT RAIN ..... 0 IIEDUCE PRESSURE ON
ft)IG(. TN<£ CAllE Ttl AYOO UNOERWOONG FENCE DURING CIDHOIJI".
4. REloKlVE ALl. FUICING IlATERiAlS ..... 0 UNSTABlE SEDliliEUT
DEPOSITS AfTUI ~E CCIITR19=~G ClWrw:£ MfA HAS HffiJ
PROP£RLY STA8Il.IZED, INSPECTED. AND APPROYEIl. GRADE ..... I}
STAHlUZE THE DISTURBED #IrA AS SOOWN IN THE VEGEI"AOO N PlAN.
. C QKT AJ:::_T
JEFF GEREKE
2200 E. RIVER RD. STE. 105
(520) 577-7800
7, CUT AND FILL SLOPE AND SLOP E TREA TMEN T TO BE IN
COMPLIANCE 'w'ITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
ACCEPTED GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING INVESTIGATION
DR THE TD'w'N OF ORO VALLEY REVEGETATION REQUIREMENTS.
8. EXCESS SOIL MATERIALS GENERATED FRO M THE EARTH'w'ORK
OPERATIONS SHALL NOT BE DISPOSED OF BY PUSHING OR
P!...ACING SP-.ID MATERIAL INTO THE AREAS DESIGNATED .';S 100
YEAR FLOOD PLAIN AREAS.
9. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ASSURING PROPER AND
ADEQUATE DRAINAGE.
10 . ELEVATION OF FINISH PAD SHALL BE CERTIFIED BY A REGISTERED
LAND SURVEYOR PRIOR THE POURING FOUNDATIONS, A COPY OF
THE CERTIFICATION MUST BE APpROVED BY THE TO'w'N OF ORO VALLEY
INSPECTION AND COMPLIANCE DIVISION PRIOR TO CALLING FOR BU ILDING
INSPECTIONS,
11. THE GROUND IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE FOUNDATION SHALL
BE SLOPED A'WAY FROM THE BUILDING AT A SLOPE OF NOT LESS
THAN ONE UNIT VERTICAL IN 20 UNITS HORIZONTAL (5-PERCENT
SLOPE) FOR A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 10 FEET MEASURED
PERPENDICUAR TO THE 'w'ALL. IF PHYSICAL OBSTRUCTIONS DR
LOT LINES PROHIBIT 10 fEET OF HORIZONTAL DISTANCE, A 5 -PERCENT
SLOPE SHALL BE PROVIDED TU AN APPROVED ALTERNA TIVE
METHOD OF DIVERTING 'WATER A'w'AY fROM THE FOUNDATION.
S'WALES USED FOR THIS PURPUSE SHALL BE SLOPED A MINIMUM OF
2-PERCENT 'WHERE LOCATED 'WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE
BUILDING FOUNDATION,
12. ADDITIONAL GRADING INFORMATION,
FINISHED SLOPES MUST CONFORM TO THE FOLLO'w'ING TO'WN ZUNING CODE
RESTRICTINS,
_3'1 (HORIZONTAL,VERTICAU DR FLATT ER SHALL BE REVEGETATED
_SLOPES 2 ,1 OR FLATTER BUT STEEPER THAN 3,1 SHALL BE STABILIZED
'w'ITH ROCK RIPRAP OVER FILTER FABRIC,
_SLOPES STEEPER THAN 2,1 SHA LL BE STABILIZED 'WITH GROUTED RIPRAP
OR RETAINJNG 'w'ALLS AS APPROPRIATE . SLOPES SHALL NOT [XCEED 1'1.
_A LTERN ATIVE METHODS OF STABILIZATION /-IAY BE ALLO'WED 'WHEN SUPPORTED
BY A GEOTECHNICAL REPORT PREPARED BY AN ARIZONA REGISTRANT.
13. PRIOR TO ANY BUILDI NG FINALS, A FINAL GRADING INSPECTION MUST
BE OBTAINED FROM THE TO 'w'N OF ORO VALLEY . CALL THE ORO
VA LLEY INSPECTION AND COMPLIANCE DIVISION AT (520) 229-4898 FOR
fOR A FINAL GRADING INSPECTION AT LEAST 24 cr'w'ENTY-FOUR) HOURS
IN ADVANCE.
14. ACS = .00 23 x I x L I PAD AREA (ACRES)
ACS = .0023 x 1 x 672.11 I 0.10
ACS = 15.46/0
15 . ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMANT'S GUIDELINES FOR HANDLING DESERT
TORTOISE SPECIMANS SHALL BE FOLLO'WED IF THESE ANIMA LS ARE ENCOUNTERED
DURING CONSTRUCTION
16. LANDSCAPING 'WITHIN THE DRIVE'w'AY SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE OF ALL
HOMES IS LIMITED TO 30 INCH MAXIMUM HEIGHT FOR ALL SHRUBS AND GROUND -
COVER AND THAT ANY TREES PLANTED 'w'ITHIN THE SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE
SHALL MA INTAIN THE ENTIRE CANOPY 6 FEET ABOVE GROUND LEVEL.
17. TOTAL GRADING:: 19,947.70 SF, TOTAL ALLo'w'ED 20,000 Sf OK
TOTAL GRADING OF 25/0 AND GREATER SLOPE'" 1,969.34 SF
1,969,34 I 19,947.70 SF :: 9.Bn OF GRADING IS ON 25/0 OR GREATR
2870
2860
2850
SLOPE
OWNER/DEVELOPER
A.F. STERLING HOMES
2840
3275 W. INA ROAD STE. 220
TUCSON , AZ. 85741
(520) 225-6800 0+00 1+00
NTS
2+00
2870
2860
2850
2840
~~DPAD
TOPO IS BASED ON ORIGINAL AERIAL FOR STONE CANYON ii
WHICH HAS BEEN f1EID VERIf1ED FOR ACCURACY BY AMERSON SURVEYING
GRADING / 25% SLOPE DISPLA Y FOR
LOT 167 STONE CANYON 1/
LOTS 135-234
CONTAINING 46,020 SF 1,06 ACRES
BOOK 53, PAGE 48 SEQ# 20000630042
MODEL 2940
M
•
I
L
o
:0
iO
1
I"
L
"'1 !
"I i
i , i Oc=::JCJ'
I Dc:s:::J.e::::J
-,
i
f r-!
I l-
,
i r-i
I
i l-i
!
! I-!
I
i l-I
I
i l.....
~'" .. ' "riu:~~
\ !
i I -i ! i ,
I
l -j
J
!
i
'<Q
,
;
i
UOAUe:l auo s o 'a:>ua ISaJ Z:lIMaUnJ"
~OO!I(~o.:s
-"'''' tllSI_""""1
~
SNOllVA313,E, OI'llll"5"-':>NOIU if! ~
I ! i ; JM .,-....... _-. ..---." --.~-,.-~-
I, .'
®
rn t;: 0 w
~ 0 ,
i
rn i
D
B
rn
Town Council Regular Session Item # 7.
Meeting Date:02/04/2015
Requested by: Councilmember Hornat & Councilmember Garner
Submitted By:Julie Bower, Town Clerk's Office
Department:Town Clerk's Office
Information
SUBJECT:
DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE DIRECTION REGARDING GROUNDWATER PRESERVATION FEES
RECOMMENDATION:
N/A
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Councilmember Hornat and Councilmember Garner have requested that the item be placed on the
agenda.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to ___________
Town Council Regular Session Item # 8.
Meeting Date:02/04/2015
Requested by: Councilmember Zinkin & Councilmember Garner
Submitted By:Julie Bower, Town Clerk's Office
Department:Town Clerk's Office
Information
SUBJECT:
*DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE DIRECTION TO STAFF TO AMEND THE ENVIRONMENTALLY
SENSITIVE LANDS (ESL) SECTION OF THE CODE
(Removed from the agenda on 2/2/15 at 3:00 p.m.)
RECOMMENDATION:
N/A
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Councilmember Zinkin and Councilmember Garner have requested that this item be placed on the
agenda.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to ____________________.
Town Council Regular Session Item # 9.
Meeting Date:02/04/2015
Requested by: Councilmember Zinkin & Councilmember Garner
Submitted By:Julie Bower, Town Clerk's Office
Department:Town Clerk's Office
Information
SUBJECT:
DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE DIRECTION TO STAFF REGARDING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF
ORDINANCE (O)14-17, AMENDING THE TAX CODE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY TO INCREASE
THE LOCAL TRANSACTION PRIVILEGE TAX (TPT) RATE FROM 2% TO 2.5% IN VARIOUS
CATEGORIES
RECOMMENDATION:
N/A
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Councilmember Zinkin and Councilmember Garner have requested that this item be placed on the
agenda.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to ____________________.
Town Council Regular Session Item # 10.
Meeting Date:02/04/2015
Requested by: Councilmember Zinkin & Councilmember Garner
Submitted By:Julie Bower, Town Clerk's Office
Department:Town Clerk's Office
Information
SUBJECT:
DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE DIRECTION REGARDING POSTPONEMENT OF THE FINAL
PURCHASE OF THE EL CONQUISTADOR GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB AND ASSOCIATED
PROPERTIES
RECOMMENDATION:
N/A
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Councilmember Zinkin and Councilmember Garner have requested the item be placed on the agenda.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to _______________________