Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPackets - Council Packets (119)Council Meeting Regular Session January 21, 2015 1 2 Announcements Meetings are subject to change. Check the Town website for meeting status. January 27 Board of Adjustment MEETING CANCELLED February 2 at 5 p.m. Hopi Conference Room Historic Preservation Commission February 4 at 6 p.m. Council Chambers Town Council Regular Session February 3 at 6 p.m. Council Chambers Planning & Zoning Commission 3 Town of Oro Valley 4 5 Town of Oro Valley Southeast Corner of First Avenue and Tangerine Road Rezoning Town Council January 21, 2015 Thank you Mayor, members of the Council… Our purpose here tonight is …. Request to rezone from R1-144 (large lot) to R1-7 (medium density) and C-1 (Commercial) … for a property located… Also known as … Also requesting Flexible Design Options 6 Town of Oro Valley N. First Avenue Palisades Rd Tangerine Rd Applicant’s Tentative Development Plan (TDP) includes...Three components. Residential 211 single-family homes on the remaining +/- 120 acres utilizing a CSD with lot sizes ranging from 5500 to 7200 Commercial A mix of retail and professional office uses on +/- 29 acres located near the arterial intersection. Open Space The CSD preserves approx. 59% of the site as open space Common theme you’ll notice are….neighborhood compatibility and open space preservation 7 Review Criteria General Plan Land Use Map Vision, Goals and Policies Special Area Policies Zoning Code Town of Oro Valley General Plan Land Use Map Vision, Goals and Policies Unique to this case…Special Area Policies that were the result of working with area neighborhoods during the 2005 GP 8 Site: Master Planned Community …Neighborhood Commercial/Office Medium Density Residential to the east Master Planned Community to the south Low Density Residential to the south and west Neighborhood Commercial/Office at the intersection of… General Plan Goals & Policies Neighborhood Compatibility Protecting: Environmental Resources Viewsheds Open Space Providing trails and paths Town of Oro Valley Reviewed for consistency with the Vision, Goals and Policies of the GP: Goals relevant to this project include: Neighborhood Compatibility Protecting Env. Resources, Viewsheds and Open Space Providing trails and paths 10 Special Area Policies Environmentally Sensitive Areas View Corridors and Building Heights Trails Density Master Planning Town of Oro Valley N. First Avenue Palisades Rd Tangerine Rd A summary of the SAP are listed on screen and a detailed analysis is provided in your packet. Touch on SAP… The PZC found the proposal is consistent with the SAP’s 11 R1-144 36,000 sf lots (R1-36) C-2 C-1 Open Space 5,000 – 7,000 sf lots (Catalina Shadows PAD) Tangerine Road C-1 R1-72 R1-36 R1-36 R1-144 PS&C Palisades Road First Avenue Site: R1-144 Surrounding Land Uses: Large Lot Residential to the south and west Commercial at the intersection of … Catalina Shadows PAD (Avg. lot size 6000 sq. ft) very similar to what the applicant is proposing here tonight 12 Environmentally Sensitive Lands Resource Areas 95% Open Space (Critical Resource Areas) 25% Open Space (Resource Management Area Tier II) Cultural Resources Scenic Resources Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District Town of Oro Valley First Avenue Tangerine Road Palisades Rd Blue…riparian areas with high resource value and require… Light tan …. areas with medium resource value and require… The intent of ESL and these categories is to preserve contiguous open space … Cultural Resources 1. Site surveyed which identified evidence of artifacts, including ceramic shards, rockpiles and shells 2. Still working on a plan to determine how the resources are protected. Scenic Resources A portion is within TRCOD….the TDP is consistent with the requirements 13 Town of Oro Valley N. First Avenue Palisades Rd Tangerine Rd As a result of Master Planning Throughout the TDP: Preservation of riparian areas…regulated slopes…mapped floodplain areas Open Space …really doubles as a buffer from adjacent development Viewshed Protection….building setbacks/heights Trails 14 Conservation Subdivision Design Town of Oro Valley “General Plan Goal 1.1.1 – The Town shall promote clustering of development to protect environmentally sensitive areas and to preserve significant, passive use, natural open space within residential neighborhoods.” To promote preservation of contiguous open space… ESL incentives the use of CSD (clustering)..also supported by the General Plan I put this up as an illustration…used to emphasize the difference between… Same number of lots, smaller lots = more open space (i.e. open space connectivity, wildlife corridors, etc…) 15 ESL Flexible Design Options Lot Size Building Setback Recreation Area Credit Native Plant Salvage Landscape Buffer Off-street Parking Building Height Town of Oro Valley N. First Avenue Palisades Rd Tangerine Rd Tools used to achieve the CSD are the flexible design options enabled by ESL. reduce the development area preserving additional open space To achieve: Increased building height Reduced setbacks Applicant has requested the use of flexible design options listed Help achieve the total OS of 59% 16 Town of Oro Valley N. First Avenue Palisades Rd Tangerine Rd Traffic circulation generally works for the residential component… As discussed in the staff report when both the residential and commercial build-out…staff has concerns about the current configuration of ingress/egress points. Potential remedy would be to provide access onto Palisades RD to improve the LOS. 17 Public Participation Neighborhood Meetings: August 15, 2013 November 19, 2013 June 16, 2014 Applicant Meetings Neighborhood Concerns Town of Oro Valley Numerous applications have been filed throughout the years…With numerous neighborhood meetings concerning this property Ultimately led to the development of the SAP’s. This project...Neighborhood Meetings - 1 Formal; 2 Open Houses Viewshed Protection/Building Heights…Neighborhood Buffers…Increased Traffic….Improved Pedestrian Connectivity Protection of Resources….Trail Preservation Conditions added to Attachment 1, Exhibit “B”, to address building heights and multi-use path on palisades Applicant – worked with neighborhood a number of times As a result….numerous changes were incorporated into the TDP…including: Trail positioning…No access onto Palisades Road…Limiting homes along Palisades to one story…Reconfiguring lot layout on Palisades 18 Summary/Recommendation General Plan Special Area Policies Zoning Code PZC heard the applicant’s proposal on in December.. PZC found Conformance with GP Vision, Goals and Policies and with a GP Land Use Map Conformance with the Special Area Policies Consistent with the Zoning Code; PZC recommends approval of the rezoning and requested flexible design options, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1, Exhibit “B” The Applicant is here to answer any questions 20 Tangerine Road First Avenue Subject property located SEC of First Avenue and Tangerine Road Planning Conditions of Approval Planning  All Kai-Capri Special Area Policies to be included as General Notes on Final Plat (Residential) and Final Site Plan (Commercial). Indicate proposed setbacks for both residential and commercial. Commercial setbacks are as follows: Front: 20 feet Side: 50 feet or 3:1 (setback to building height ratio), whichever is greater Rear: 50 feet or 3:1 (setback to building height ratio), whichever is greater A minimum 15’ buffer yard Type “B” is required along the eastern edge of the proposed commercial, per Table 27-7. Homes on lots 5 through 12 are limited to one-story. The following Environmentally Sensitive Lands Flexible Design Options are applicable: Building Setback: Building setback reduction to no less than a five (5’) foot side setback and no less than a ten (10’) foot front setback so long as it doesn’t result in an on-lot driveway of less than twenty (20’) feet. Landscape Buffer Yard: a reduction of no less than ten (10’) feet. Not allowed along street frontages and adjacent to any existing and proposed residential. Minimum lot size: A minimum lot size reduction to 5,500 square feet in accordance with the Conservation Subdivision Design lot reduction incentive. Off-street parking modification: A modification for future development in accordance with Section 27.7.C.2 (Alternative Parking Ratio) of the Zoning Code. Building Height: A building height increase from eighteen (18’) feet to twenty (20’) for pitched roof residential within 200 feet of North First Avenue, or within 150 feet of Palisades Road or existing development. Recreation Area Credit: Active and Passive recreation area count towards the overall ESOS requirement. Native Plant Preservation: the native plant salvage and mitigation requirements of Section 27.6 are waived for all development within development envelopes. Engineering Conditions Engineering A multi-use path will be required to be constructed along the project’s frontage with Palisades Road. The path is to be constructed during construction of the applicant’s project to the south of Palisades Road or with this project, whichever is built first. This will fulfill the requirement for a sidewalk or multi-use path for both projects along the Palisades Road frontage. When the commercial area is developed, appropriate traffic mitigation measures shall be implemented so the project drive located at the Oro Valley Retail Center intersection operates at an acceptable level of service with the addition of the commercial traffic. Town of Oro Valley 23 Parks & Recreation Conditions All trails to be dedicated “non-vehicular permanent public recreation easements” Town of Oro Valley 24 25 Meritage on First – North Applicant Presentation Town Council January 21, 2015 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 Nakoma Sky Retirement Community Minor General Plan Amendment, ESL Zoning Map Amendment & Rezoning Town Council January 21, 2015 45 Requests I. Minor General Plan Amendment II. ESL Map Amendment III. Rezoning to PAD 46 Our purpose tonight is to consider the proposed Nakoma Sky Retirement Campus on 79 acres at the southeast corner of 1st Avenue and Naranja Drive The request has three components as follows: Minor General Plan Amendment to clarify a Special Area Policy An amendment to the ESL Planning Map Rezoning of the property to Planned Area Development (PAD) In summary, the applicant and staff worked to resolve a number of issues, which resulted in a list of conditions which were included in the Commission’s recommendation of approval on this case. I’ll briefly cover each individual request, and then focus on the conditions of approval which addressed a number of primary issues with the development. As a reminder, although the cases will be presented together, a separate vote will be required on each individual request. Location Naranja Dr Oracle Rd First Ave Lambert Ln The property is an 79 acre site located east of First Avenue just north of the CDO wash, between Lambert Lane and Naranja Drive It’s located in a key location in the Town in close proximity to the Rooney Ranch shopping centers, including Home Depot center, Fry’s, Target, as well as the historic Steam Pump Ranch North of the property is the planned Kai South development for large lot residential and also existing residential development West of the property is existing large lot residential Topography and slopes This is a map showing the topography and steep slopes on the property As you can see there are several areas with slopes greater than 25%. (dark red) Site is challenging from a topography standpoint, but it also provides some advantages to limit visibility of the height of the buildings, primarily from First Avenue The Town regulates development on steep slopes to ensure that they’re protected from excessive encroachment and maintain a natural appearance 48 General Plan Land Use RLDR MPC COP OS LDR2 MDR LDR1 NCO LDR1 PSP CRC NCO 49 The subject property is designated on the General Plan as Master Planned Community. Master Planned Community Large multi-use developments Developed in a comprehensive manner Previously planned for a 68 lot single family residential project Surrounding designations include Low-Density Residential, OS, Regional Commercial (Rooney Ranch (Target and Home Depot Centers) I. Minor General Plan Amendment Special Area Policy The area designated as Master Planned Community may be developed at up to three units per acre if developed as a single family residential subdivision. This policy does not apply to senior living or senior care facilities 50 So, that brings us to the first portion of the request. The General Plan contains a Special Area Policy which applies to this project, which is shown in yellow text. Since Nakoma Sky is not a typical residential subdivision, the applicant wishes to clarify that the policy does not apply to the proposed senior care use. The proposed clarification is provided in underlined text. Staff is supportive of the policy clarification. We believe it was intended to apply to single-family residential development when it was established in 2005, around the same timeframe the 68 lot single-family subdivision was approved. Zoning Code provides that when clarification of a policy is needed that the PZ Commission and Town Council can approve as a Minor General Plan Amendment II. Environmentally Sensitive Lands Map Amendment Revise riparian area (Critical Resource Area) Biologist hired to re-evaluate Town of Oro Valley In terms of the second request: The applicant is requesting an amendment to the Town’s Environmentally Sensitive lands map. In terms of the existing environmentally sensitive lands designations on the property, there are two. Area is blue is currently designated as critical resource area, also referred to as riparian area. Area in tan, remainder of site is RMA Tier 2, requires 25% open space The requested map amendment deals with the riparian corridor, which was shown in blue on the previous slide. The applicant questioned whether this entire area meets the criteria for a Critical Resource Area, or only a portion. The applicant hired a biologist to survey the site. The biologist, RECON, was the same biologist used by the Town in the original ESL mapping, so there is continuity with this consultant. The biologist also was required to employ the same methodology as was employed within the original ESL mapping. Based on their field survey, only the area in green meets the CRA criteria for xeroriparian habitat. The areas shown in gold hatch does not meet the criteria and staff is supportive of the amendment based on our review of the biologists study. 51 III. Proposed Rezoning Self-contained senior living campus Independent and assisted living Approximately 400 units Supporting uses Dining and entertainment Parks Recreation Arts & culture Retail/office Proposing 5 story building (75’ + 10’ architectural features) 52 The applicant requests a rezoning from to Nakoma Sky PAD, which would permit development of a self-contained senior living campus. The applicant will give a detailed overview of the project, but as a general overview: The project includes both independent and assisted living units, totaling approximately 400 units A number of supporting uses are planned including: Dining and entertainment, parks, arts and cultural facilities and a small retail and office area The central building is a 5 story senior apartment building and the core of the campus. III. Proposed Rezoning 1st Avenue Lambert Ln. 53 Again, the applicant will provide a thorough presentation, but I’d like to provide an overview of the proposed plan 2 access points from First Avenue Starting from the main entry Sales/welcome center Retail area Campus Core (residential apartments (5 story bldg.), rec. arts and culture amenities Park area Assisted living memory care Independent living (attached and detached units) Town of Oro Valley Neighborhood Participation June 25th neighborhood meeting September 29th neighborhood meeting November 15th site tour December 15th neighborhood meeting There was significant public outreach on this project including 3 neighborhood meetings and a site tour. The neighborhood meetings were sparsely attended by the public, but the site tour drew more residents (approximately 25) Issues raised at the neighborhood meetings included -Visual impacts, specifically the height of the 5 story apartment building -Grading impacts -Context sensitive building design -Environmental impacts -Water conservation -Public access to recreational and cultural amenities 54 Planning and Zoning Commission -Primary Issues Building Height Building Design and Architectural Theming Water Features Traffic Access Parking Public Use of recreation areas Lack of regulatory effect of Tentative Development Plan Town of Oro Valley The requests were considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission on January 6th. The Commission discussion focused on a number of primary issues with the application, which included: Building Height Building Design and Architectural Theming Water Features Access Parking Public Use of recreation areas Lack of regulatory effect of the Tentative Development Plan In the next few slides, I will provide an overview on these issues and how the conditions recommended by the Commission address these issues 55 Building Height 5 Stories – 75 feet Topography limits visibility November 15th Site Tour Design Standards - Roof and Wall Plane Variation - Landscaped Terracing - Other Architectural Treatments - Reduced heights on ends Town of Oro Valley A primary issue with the proposal was the height of the 5 story apartment building at 75 feet, with the allowance to add 10 feet additional for architectural features Given the topography of the site, a significant portion of the building will not be visible from First Avenue and visibility from the north is minimized due to distance and drop in elevation. Significant visibility of this building will exist from Oracle Road, and from the south from the CDO bridge, so it was important to get it right and make sure the PAD contained adequate design requirements to minimize the visual impact of the building. To assess the visual impact, the applicant placed balloons on the site at the height of this building and conducted a site tour for the public, Commission, CDRB and Town Council members to gain a perspective on the impact of the proposed building height. To minimize the visual impact of the apartment building, the applicant has agreed to conditions which require the following: -Use of varied roof and wall planes, with a heightened emphasis on the roofline of the southern wing of the building -Use of different building and roof materials -Landscaped terraces on multiple levels of the building -Low reflectivity windows -Use of several muted earth tone colors -Architectural features at the corners of the building to soften the appearance. -Other measures approved by CDRB and Town Council -Reduced building heights on the ends of the building 56 Building Design and Theming Previous Concerns - Lack of tie between representative imagery and PAD - Imagery shown at neighborhood meetings not included/required by PAD - Requirement for 4 sided architecture Town of Oro Valley As explained in the staff report, a previous concern was the lack of a tie between all the imagery shown by the applicant at the neighborhood meetings and the actual PAD document This is a large, multi-phase development which will build out over the next 10-20 years, so it’s important to ensure that the PAD document is clear and contains enough detail and force and effect to realize the vision represented by the applicant today. The modified conditions address these concerns by requiring: -The architectural character and theming of the project is equal to or exceeds the imagery contained with the PAD document as determined by the Conceptual Design Review Board and Town Council. -Another condition recommended tonight requires that all facades of every building in the PAD contain consistent architectural treatment or 4 sided architecture. 57 Traffic Access Town of Oro Valley The applicant proposes two points of access: Lambert (signal) and then to the north During the review process, staff explored the potential for a access to the north to connect to the signalized intersection at Naranja. The applicant was willing to amend their plan to provide this access point, if the property owner to the north was in agreement. Staff discussed this at length with the property owner to the north and could not come to an agreement. Their concerns are the impact of a shared access with their residents accessing large estate lots, and the mixing of residential and service traffic associated with the senior care facility. As they are already zoned, the Town cannot force them to provide access through their property. As stated in the staff report, the applicant has provided a traffic impact study showing the site can be safely and adequately served by the two proposed access points. The southern drive is at a signalized intersection which is designed to handle the majority of the traffic generated from the uses. The northern most drive serves a smaller area and the traffic generation from this area is very low and can be safely and efficiently served by this northern drive. David Laws is here… 58 Primary Issues Water Features Parking Public Use of recreation areas Lack of regulatory effect of Tentative Development Plan Town of Oro Valley A primary previous concern was the proposed use of water features, which is prohibited by the Zoning Code. The applicant has agreed to prohibit the use of water for ornamental purposes, consistent with Code requirements. During the neighborhood meeting process, the applicant indicated that underground parking would be used for a portion of the parking to minimize the site impact of surface parking. The applicant has now agreed to a condition requiring any parking in excess of that shown on the Tentative Development Plan and within the PAD shall be provided either underground or under building. During the neighborhood meeting process, the applicant represented that the park area, meeting rooms and other facilities would be available and open to the public on a limited basis. This representation was not reflected in the PAD. The applicant has now agreed to a condition which requires recreational facilities and meeting areas to be available to the public and a Public Access Agreement is required prior to the rezoning becoming effective. The last primary issue dealt with the language in the PAD which reduced the force and effect of the Tentative Development Plan which has been represented at all the public meetings. The applicant has now agreed to a condition which adopts the Tentative Development Plan and allow modifications to the plan to be processed as provided in the Zoning Code. The balance of the conditions require: Use clarifications Requires the development provide recreational areas consistent with the recently drafted senior care ordinance Adjustmentss relative to path and other recreational improvements Attachment 1 not Attachment A 59 Recommendation Approval of Minor General Plan Amendment Approval of ESL Map Amendment Approval of Rezoning Town of Oro Valley Approval of Minor General Plan Amendment as provided on Attachment 1 related to case OV1114-005 Approval of ESL Map Amendment Approval of Rezoning subject to the conditions in Attachment 1 related to the rezoning case OV914-007 60 61 Viewshed analysis Town of Oro Valley 62 November 15th Site Tour Viewed site from several vantage points Understanding of site conditions and building height Town of Oro Valley View from CDO path behind Steam Pump Village November 15th site tour. 21 color coded balloons were placed on the property to represent the locations, massing and proposed heights of buildings Focus was on the residential apartment building (proposed to be 75 feet + 10 feet for arch features), shown in red. We went to several vantage points to get a better understanding of the site conditions and potential visual impacts of the proposed buildings, both view impacts and overall visibility 63 November 15th Site Tour Town of Oro Valley 64 November 15th Site Tour Town of Oro Valley 65 III. Proposed Rezoning: Development Areas 66 I’d like to give you an overview of the applicant’s proposal. Just to reiterate that the applicant is going to review their proposal in greater detail Applicant proposing a range of senior living uses, including independent living, assisted living and memory (dementia) care facilities. Similar to Splendido, La Posada is intended to provide different levels of care depending on the needs of the residents Also proposes supporting uses, including Project is unique in the Town given the range and integration of uses The zoning on the property currently permits single family homes. They are requesting a rezoning of the property. On the next two slides I’ll explain how this works and the zoning they’re proposing to develop this project IV. Grading Exception Required to exceed Town grading limitations Previous grading exception does not apply Town of Oro Valley 67 Existing Zoning 68 I’d like to give you an overview of the applicant’s proposal. Just to reiterate that the applicant is going to review their proposal in greater detail Applicant proposing a range of senior living uses, including independent living, assisted living and memory (dementia) care facilities. Similar to Splendido, La Posada is intended to provide different levels of care depending on the needs of the residents Also proposes supporting uses, including Project is unique in the Town given the range and integration of uses The zoning on the property currently permits single family homes. They are requesting a rezoning of the property. On the next two slides I’ll explain how this works and the zoning they’re proposing to develop this project History 1989: Rooney Ranch Zoning (PAD) established Mixed Use: Commercial Single-family residential Multi-family residential Open Space 2003: Rezoning to Rooney “Z” PAD to permit single-family residential development 2005: 68 home subdivision approved, including grading exception History: 1989 – Rooney Ranch PAD established 2003 – PAD Amendment to change use of project area to single family residential use only 2005 – 68-lot subdivision for Pepper-Viner homes approved. along with it, a grading exception approved to exceed Town’s grading limits. I will explain more in a few moments Proposed Nakoma Sky project proposes the same uses as originally envisioned for the property 69 Existing Zoning: Rooney Ranch “Z” PAD Naranja Dr First Ave Lambert Ln Currently, the property is entitled for single family residential development. There is currently an approved plat for a 68-lot subdivision, which was approved in 2003. 70 Proposed view #1 Town of Oro Valley 71 Proposed view #2 Town of Oro Valley 72 Proposed view #3 Town of Oro Valley 73 Proposed view #4 Town of Oro Valley 74 Proposed view #5 Town of Oro Valley 75 Proposed view #6 Town of Oro Valley 76 Proposed view #7 Town of Oro Valley 77 Proposed view #8 Town of Oro Valley 78 Proposed view #9 Town of Oro Valley 79 Proposed view #10 Town of Oro Valley 80 Proposed view #11 Town of Oro Valley 81 Proposed view #12 Town of Oro Valley 82 Proposed view #13 Town of Oro Valley 83 Proposed view #14 Town of Oro Valley 84 Proposed view #15 Town of Oro Valley 85 Proposed view #16 Town of Oro Valley 86 Traffic Traffic Impact Analysis Improvements directly related to proposal Example: 1st Ave. between Tangerine and Lambert = 16,600 vehicles/day - 1st. Ave. Capacity = 36,000 vehicles/day - Project will generate 1,400 vehicles/day Traffic Impact Analysis is required Developer required to build any improvements directly related to proposal, including signals, turn lanes, deceleration lanes, additional lanes, etc. 87 Drainage Developer is required to: Provide a drainage study Mimic pre-developed conditions Protect against flooding and erosion on site All improvements enforced by Town Town of Oro Valley Topography shows steep slopes that affect drainage Some things the applicant must provide… Drainage - drainage study - mimic pre-development conditions - protect against flooding/erosion on their site What are these? ---study drainage patterns to develop appropriate infrastructure ---must not increase/decrease pre-development water flow - upstream/downstream --- drainage controls internally Enforced by the Town 88 Cultural Resources Cultural Resources Survey Inventory Treatment Plan Town of Oro Valley Significant effort for Hohokam Mesa (South) – 315 pages Included a portion of Parcel 5F - remainder be surveyed with no resources Other parcels surveyed and treatment plan will be necessary if …. 89 90 91 Characteristics of the overall site Focus on the main building 92 93 94 95 96 97 2. RESIDENTIAL COTTAGES 3. ASSISTED LIVING & MEMORY CARE 4. RESIDENTIAL VILLAS 5. MOUNTAIN VIEW HOMES 1. VILLAGE RETAIL 6. VILLAGE CORE 7. COMMUNITY PARK January 21, 2015 Presentation January 21, 2015 Presentation 100 EXTERIOR MATERIALS 101 January 21, 2015 Presentation 103 104 La Posada Retirement Community 105 In a beautiful place… 106 Our Mission is: To Maximize The Well-Being of Seniors 107 La Vista 108 La Perla 109 Garden Homes 110 Park Centre Homes 111 La Joya, La Via, La Hacienda 112 Central Park 113 Labyrinth, Meditation Garden 114 The Shoppes at La Posada 115 Total Annual Economic Impact of La Posada to Southern Arizona: $52.9 Million (University of Arizona Eller MBA Economic Impact Study) 116 Community outreach: • 53 community organizations were provided space at La Posada • 2,023 pounds of food donated to Community Food Bank • $101,000 devoted to Good Neighbor Fund • $60,000 to the Green Valley Fire District • $101,482 in La Posada scholarships to 77 area youths • Direct donations to community groups, including: Continental School, U of A College of Nursing, Community Performance and Arts Center, Alzheimer’s Association, United Community Health Center, Valley Assistance Services, Green Valley Health Fair The Shoppes at La Posada: • $115,298 raised in activities and courtyard benefit events 117 Casa Community Services: • 1,858 days of care in Adult Day Services • 113 children enrolled at Los Niños del Valle • 7,478 lunches served at the Casa Community Center • 24,370 individual visits logged at Community Center events and classes • 321 in-home counseling sessions • 134 counseling sessions at Casa Community Connect: • 2,098 visits by individuals • 16 groups using the location for meetings • 195 individuals screened for balance • 652 attendees at health events and group meetings 118 Volunteers: • 18,639 hours Residents volunteered on campus • 25,616 hours Residents volunteered off campus • 105 off-campus volunteers gave 9,265 hours to the La Posada campus • 61,020 total volunteer hours valued at $1,281,000 Community leadership hours: • 2,085 in hours provided by La Posada management team and Board of Trustees valued at $116,283. 119 120