HomeMy WebLinkAboutPackets - Council Packets (150)
AGENDA
ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL
REGULAR SESSION
November 19, 2014
ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
11000 N. LA CAÑADA DRIVE
REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS
COUNCIL REPORTS
• Spotlight on Youth
DEPARTMENT REPORTS
The Mayor and Council may consider and/or take action on the items listed below:
ORDER OF BUSINESS: MAYOR WILL REVIEW THE ORDER OF THE MEETING
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
1. 2014 Arizona Town Hall Trip Report - Councilmember Hornat
2. FY 2014-2015 First Quarter Public Safety Providers Reports (July - Sept. 2014)
3. Letter of Appreciation - Oro Valley Police Department
CALL TO AUDIENCE – At this time, any member of the public is allowed to address the Mayor and
Town Council on any issue not listed on today’s agenda. Pursuant to the Arizona Open Meeting
Law, individual Council Members may ask Town Staff to review the matter, ask that the matter be placed
on a future agenda, or respond to criticism made by speakers. However, the Mayor and Council may
not discuss or take legal action on matters raised during “Call to Audience.” In order to speak during
“Call to Audience” please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card.
PRESENTATIONS
1. Presentation of Certificates to graduates of the Community Academy - Local Governance 101
class
2. Proclamation - Giving Tuesday
CONSENT AGENDA
(Consideration and/or possible action)
A. Minutes - November 5, 2014
B. Fiscal Year 2014/15 Financial Update through September 2014
C. Greater Oro Valley Chamber of Commerce Quarterly Report: July 1, 2014 - September 30,
2014
D. Visit Tucson Quarterly Report: July 1, 2014 - September 30, 2014
E. Request for approval of conceptual public art for the Copper Health Skilled Nursing Facility
located on the northwest corner of Rancho Vistoso and Sun City Boulevards
REGULAR AGENDA
1. PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING AN
APPLICATION FOR A SERIES 12 (RESTAURANT) LIQUOR LICENSE FOR ALL THE
BUZZ CAFE LOCATED AT 12985 N. ORACLE ROAD, SUITE 165
2.AMENDING SECTION 28.6.B OF THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED
a. RESOLUTION NO. (R)14-57, DECLARING THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE ORO
VALLEY ZONING CODE SECTION 28.6.B., RELATING TO TEMPORARY ROADWAY
CONSTRUCTION SIGNS, PROVIDED AS ATTACHMENT 1, EXHIBIT "A" WITHIN THE
ATTACHED RESOLUTION AND FILED WITH THE TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE, A PUBLIC
RECORD
b. PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE NO. (O)14-14, AMENDING SECTION 28.6.B OF THE
ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE TO ADD A NEW TEMPORARY SIGN TYPE FOR
BUSINESSES LOCATED WITHIN ROAD CONSTRUCTION AREAS
3.AMENDING SECTION 27.10.D.3 OF THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED
a. RESOLUTION NO. (R)14-58, DECLARING THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE ORO
VALLEY ZONING CODE SECTION 27.10.D.3, TANGERINE ROAD CORRIDOR OVERLAY
DISTRICT, PROVIDED AS EXHIBIT "A" WITHIN THE ATTACHED RESOLUTION AND
FILED WITH THE TOWN CLERK, A PUBLIC RECORD
b. PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE NO. (O)14-15, AMENDING SECTION 27.10.D.3 OF THE
ZONING CODE, TANGERINE ROAD CORRIDOR OVERLAY DISTRICT, TO PROVIDE
THE TOWN ENGINEER THE DISCRETION TO REDUCE DRIVEWAY ACCESS
SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS (The Council may bring forth general topics for future meeting agendas.
Council may not discuss, deliberate or take any action on the topics presented pursuant to ARS
38-431.02H)
CALL TO AUDIENCE – At this time, any member of the public is allowed to address the Mayor and
CALL TO AUDIENCE – At this time, any member of the public is allowed to address the Mayor and
Town Council on any issue not listed on today’s agenda. Pursuant to the Arizona Open Meeting
Law, individual Council Members may ask Town Staff to review the matter, ask that the matter be
placed on a future agenda, or respond to criticism made by speakers. However, the Mayor and Council
may not discuss or take legal action on matters raised during “Call to Audience.” In order to speak
during “Call to Audience” please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker
card.
ADJOURNMENT
POSTED: 11/12/14 at 5:00 p.m. by mrs
When possible, a packet of agenda materials as listed above is available for public inspection at least 24
hours prior to the Council meeting in the office of the Town Clerk between the hours of 8:00 a.m. –
5:00p.m.
The Town of Oro Valley complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If any person with a
disability needs any type of accommodation, please notify the Town Clerk’s Office at least five days prior
to the Council meeting at 229-4700.
INSTRUCTIONS TO SPEAKERS
Members of the public have the right to speak during any posted public hearing. However, those
items not listed as a public hearing are for consideration and action by the Town Council during
the course of their business meeting. Members of the public may be allowed to speak on these
topics at the discretion of the Chair.
If you wish to address the Town Council on any item(s) on this agenda, please complete a speaker card
located on the Agenda table at the back of the room and give it to the Town Clerk. Please indicate on
the speaker card which item number and topic you wish to speak on, or if you wish to speak
during “Call to Audience”, please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue
speaker card.
Please step forward to the podium when the Mayor announces the item(s) on the agenda which you are
interested in addressing.
1. For the record, please state your name and whether or not you are a Town resident.
2. Speak only on the issue currently being discussed by Council. Please organize your speech, you will
only be allowed to address the Council once regarding the topic being discussed.
3. Please limit your comments to 3 minutes.
4. During “Call to Audience” you may address the Council on any issue you wish.
5. Any member of the public speaking must speak in a courteous and respectful manner to those present.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Town Council Regular Session Item # 1.
Meeting Date:11/19/2014
Submitted By:Arinda Asper, Town Manager's Office
Information
Subject
2014 Arizona Town Hall Trip Report - Councilmember Hornat
Attachments
Hornat 2014 Arizona Town Hall Trip Report
Office of the Mayor & Town Co u ncil
Trip Report
Purpose: 105th Arizona Town Hall
Date: November 2 - 5 ,2014
Location: EI Tovar Hotel
Grand Canyon South Rim , AZ
Attendees: Councilmember Joe Hornat
Summary:
The 1 05th Arizona Town Hall on Arizona 's Economy addressed how to use Arizona 's unique strengths to
support a thriving economy for all of Arizona 's diverse communities.
Attendees spent the bulk of their time participating in facilitated discussions designed to build consensus
for future action . Highlights of the meeting included the following:
• The speaker on the topic of "How Arizona Can Capitalize on Global Economic Trends" was Dr .
James A. (Jim) Crupi, President and founder of Strategic Leadership Solutions , Inc .
• A presentation made by Mary Murphy , an officer at The Pew Charitable Trusts , who serves as a
principal ana lyst on Pew's state and local fiscal hea lth initiatives
In addition, al l participants received materials that will serve as a useful reference when they return to
their communities .
The agenda and list of participants is attached.
Report submitted to the T wn Clerk on Novembe
Caringfor our heritage, our community, ourfuture.
www,orovalleyaz.gov
'1000 N. La Canada Drive· Oro Valley, Arizona 85737
phone: (520) 229-4700· fax: (520) 297-0428
A G1Z0NA ~ TOWN HALL
T , , '
SUNDAY, NOVEMBE R 2
3:00 -6:00 p.m.
6:00 -7:00 p.m.
7:00 p.m.
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 3
7:0 0 a.m. -8:00 a.m.
8:30 a.m. -Noon
12:30 p.m. -2:00 p.m.
2:30 p.m. -5:00 p.m.
6:00 p.m . -7:00 p.m.
7:00 p.m.
T UESDAY, NOVEMBER 4
8:30 a.m. -Noon
12:30 p.m. -2:00 p.m.
2:30 p.m. -5:00 p.m.
6:30 p.m . -8:00 p.m.
WE DNES DAY, NOVEMBE R 5
6:45 -8 :15 a.m.
105th ARIZONA TOWN HALL
ARIZONA'S ECONOMY
GRAND C ANYON , ARI Z ONA
NOVEMBER 2·5, 2 014
Registration (Lobby, EI T ovar Hotel)
Socia l hour (Lobby, EI T ovar Hotel)
Opening D inner & Orientation (Main Dining Rm ., EI Tovar Hotel)
Scott Rhodes , Boa rd Chai r, and T ar a Jacks on , Pres ident
Buffet Breakfast (Maswik Lodge)
Key Facts You Ne ed to Know : Panel presentation by authors
of the 105th Arizona T own Hall Background Report
Panel Discussions (all participants -various locations)
Luncheon (Dining Room , EI T ovar Hotel):
Lunch eo n Spea ke r, Dr. J ames A . (Jim) Cru p i , President and
founder of St rategic Leadership So lut ions , Inc.
Continuation of panel discussions (va rious locat ions)
Social hour (Maswik Lodge)
Dinner (Santa Fe Dining Room , Maswik Lodge):
Dinner Prese ntation : Th e Pew Cha ri tab l e Tru sts
Breakfast on your own
Continuation of panel discussions (various locations)
Luncheon (Santa Fe Dining Room, Maswik Lodge):
Presentation by Arizona Town Hall Boa rd Members
Special Ente rtainment by the Northern Arizona University School
of Music Students
Continua tion of panel discussions (various locations)
Wine, Cheese and B uff et Reception; special recogni tion of
student participants
Individual panel caucuses (various locations)
8:30 a.m. to approx. 12:30 p.m . Plenary Session (Santa Fe Dining Room , Maswik Lodge)
Adjournment
Town Ha ll Parti cipan t s and Observers
105" Arizona T own Hall
"Arizona's Economy"
Grand Canyon, Arizona
November 2·5, 2014
Aakhus, Todd : Director, Community Partnership Programs, Rio Salado College, Surprise
Anderson , Noah : Student, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff
Baele , Roger : General Manager, UR S Corpporation, Phoenix
Benesch, Wayne C.: Attorney; Managing Director, Byrne & Benesch, PC , Yuma· Panel Chair
Bentier, Da vid J .: Economic Development Manager, Arizona Public Service, Phoenix
Bierman, Sandra L.: Directo r of L egal Services, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Arizona, Phoenix
Brews ter, Ka rl a K.: Professor, N orthern Arizona Univers ity, Fla gstaff
Brutsc he , Juliana L.: D irector of Development, AZ Culture, Verde Valley
Carr, Bryan : Student, P ima Community College, Tucson
Clemens, Matthew A. (Matt): Student, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff
C l eveland, Stephen S.: City Manager, City of Buckeye
Cram er, Amy S .: Professor, Pim a Community College, Tucson
Daldrup, Nina : Executive Director, T he Mini Ti me Machine Museum of Miniatures, T ucson
Daugherty, David B. (Dave): Associate Director, Morrison Institute for Public Policy , Tempe·
Background Re port Editor
Davis, Bobby G.: Economic Development Special ist, Town of Payson
Densmore , Kristen : Ex ecutive Director, The Milagro Arts Center, Prescott
Dink l e, James W. (Jim): Executive Director, Access Arizona, Casa Grande
Duncan , Dean : Senior Director, Strategic Planning, Salt River Project, T empe
Esler, Margaret 0 .: Assosiate , Polsinelli, Phoenix· R ecorder
Esqu erra, Nathan L. (Levi): Director, Center for American Indian Economic Development, Flagstaff
Farrell , John C.: Outreach & Recruitment Coordinator, Pima Community College, T ucson
Ferreira, Bryan A.: Student, Pima Community College, Vail
Galbraith , Debra : T own Manager, T own of Payson
Garc ia, Kar l a E .: Student, Rio Salado Community College, Phoenix
Garfie l d , William M . (Bill): President , Arizona Water Company , Phoenix
Gaxiola, Tannya R.: Assistant Vice President, Community Relations , University of Arizona, Tu cson
Grady, Harvey : Pr esident & C EO, Cornucopia Community Advocates, Sedona
Gr ant, Ed : Principal Analyist, Salt River Project, Phoenix
Hans en, David (Dave): Directo r of Finance, Jenni ngs , Strouss & Salmon , PLC, Phoenix
Harrington, Arthur R. (Art): President , Harrington Finan cial Services , Bullhead City
Harris, J ennifer E.: Real Estate Agent, Long Realty Company, Tucs on
Haske ll , Kurt: Director, Small Business Development Center, Yavapai Coll ege, Prescott
Hornat, Joe: Councilmembe r , Town of Oro Valley
Huntwork, J ames R. (Jim): Member, Salmon, Lewis & Weldon, Phoenix
Ireland , Rick : Business Development Manager, Arrington Wa tk ins Architects, P hoenix
Jones, Charl es E. (Bud): Fo rm er Chief Justice, Arizona Supreme Court, Ph oenix
Kennedy , Ell e n : Advancement Officer, Northern Arizona University, Flag staff
Kitagawa , Kath l ee n A. (Kathy): Owner & Consultant, KAK Compensation Se rvice s, LLC, Tucson
L a ra, Ernest (Ernie): Pres ident, Est rella Mounta in Community College, Avondale
Larson , Eric M.: Director of Acquisitions , Arizona Association for Economic Development Pa rtners ,
Scottsdale
Lem os, Stac ey: Fina nce Director, T own of Oro Valley
Lom e li , Stephanie R.: Student, Ray High School, Kearny
Marcus, Eric K.: Executive Dir ecto r, Sus taina ble Eco nomic Develop men t Initiative of North ern Arizona
(S EDI ), Fl agstaff
Massey, Roric : City Attorney, City of Goodyear
Matthews, J ayson S.: Di rector of Ending Hu nger, Valley of the Sun United Way , Phoenix
Mayon, Marli J.: Student, Scottsdale Community College, Scottsdale
McDermott, Patrick A .: Community Affairs Manager, Arizona Public Service, Phoenix
McLeod , Tammy : Vice Pr esident, Energy Resource Management, Arizona Publi c Se rv ice, Ph oenix
Meaker, Matthew B. (Matt): Attorney, Sacks Tierney PA, Scottsdale
Mehta, Jams h eed: Deputy Town Manager , T own of Marana
Mellon , Shelley : President, R. L. Jones Insu rance, Yuma
Minnaugh , Michael J .: Attorney, Ridenour, Hienton & L ewis, Phoenix -Recorder
Miraben, George W .: Con sultant, Miraben Consulting; Ret. Senior Vice Pr esident & CAO , Illinova Corp.;
Forme r Chair, Ariz ona Town Hall, Tuc son -Pan el Chair
Montagn e, Sarah (Sally): District Governor, Ari zona Rotary Di strict 5500, Oro Valley
Moore , Hunter : Director of Government Re lations , Navajo Coun ty , Holbrook
Moreno, Al ec R .: Student, Pima Community College, Tucson
Morrison , Richard N.: Manager, ElM Enterprises, LL C, Gilbert
Murphy, James J . (Jim): Ret. Pr es id ent & CEO , Pi ma Council on Aging , Tucson
Nelson, Aika T.: Student, Glendale Community College, Glendale
Norris , Pat ric ia K . (Pat): Judge , Arizona Court of Appeals, Phoenix -Panel Chair
Nunez , Celest e: Student, Pima Community College , Tucson
Ocampo , Kath e line M . (K athy): Interim Associate Dean, Parker Lea rning Center, Park er
Olivas , Alberto : Dir ec tor, Cente r for Civic Pa rticipation, Maricopa Community Colleges, Tempe
Parkin s on, Callie N .: Associate, Kercsmar & Feltus PL LC, Scottsda le -R ecorder
Pastric k , Juli e: CEO, Greater Flagstaff Chamber of Commerce , Flagstaff
Pa y n e, Christopher W . (Chr is): Attorney , Snell & Wilmer LLP , Phoenix -Re co rd er
Peel, Michael T .: Government Relations Advanced Analyst , Pima Community College , Tucson
Petrequin, Paul: Residential Faculty, His tory, Maricopa County Community College District.
2
Potts, Clifford (Cliff): Designaled Broker, Prudential Arizona Really, P ayson
Raible , J effr ey J . (Jeff): Councilmember-elecl, City of Lilchfield Park; Projecl Manager, American
Expr ess, Lit chfie ld Park
Ramos, Nan cy M.: Student, Northern Arizona University , Fl agstaff
Regn e r, Willi am J . (Bi ll ): Councilmember, Town of Clarkdale
Rhodes, J. Scott : Managing Attorney, Jennings, Stro u ss & Salmon, PL C, Phoenix
Rob erts, Kevin : Princ ipal, Dibb le Eng ineering, Phoenix
Rooney, Jam es C. (Casey): Dir ector, Economic Development, City of CottonwoodNerde Valley
Russo, Jason Z. M.: Student, Paradise Valley Community College , Phoenix
Sc h atz, Miche ll e R.: Student, Northern Arizona U niv ersity, Flagstaff
Skoog, Harvey C.: Ma yor, Pr escott Valley
Sl oan , Daniell e: Student , N orthern Arizona University, Flagstaff
Snyder, Nico le K .: Director, Marketing & Bus iness Development, DWL Architects & Planners, Inc.,
Phoenix
Sosa , Gilberto : Student, Phoenix College, Phoenix
Sreecharana , Devin : Attorney , May , Potenza , Baran & Gillespie , PC ,Phoenix
Stigmon, J o hn E.: Vice President , Economic Collaborative of Northern Arizona, Flagstaff
Talbot, Ange la : Vice President, Business Development, Greater Phoenix Economic Council, Ph oenix
Ta ylor, Karrin K.: Attorney; Executive Vice President, Entitlements , DMB Associates, Inc., Scottsdale
Timmer, Rebecca : Corporate Relations , Dibble E ngineering , Phoenix -Pan el Chair
Townsend, Michae l (Mik e): Deputy Director, Coconino County, Fla gstaff
Tucker, Wil l iam J . (Bill): General Manager, Comme rcial Real E state, Yavapai-Prescott Indian Tribe,
Pr escott
Un derwood, Richard : Vice President, Underwood Bros., Inc. d.b.a. AAA Landscape & Arid Solutions ,
Tucson
Urquidez, Fra n cisco J . J r .: Student, Pi ma Community College, Tu cson
VanHook, T .: CEO , H abitat for Human ity Tucson, Tucson
Vescovi-Chiordi , Heath S.: Management Assistant, T own of Marana
Wa l ker, Gregory A . (Greg): Vice Pr esident, Mullimodal Planning, Huitt-Zollars, Phoenix
Walke r , Juli e M.: Tr ansportation Pl anner, Maricopa Association o f Governments, Phoenix
Warner, Dyl an T .: Student , Estrella Mountain Community College, EI Mirage
Wash in gton , Janice : State Director, Arizona Small Business Development Center Network , Tempe
Wes t , Claire : Principal, Cl aire West Consulting, Ph oenix
Wilkins, Kevin : Economic Development Administrator, City of Yuma
Wilson, Donald L. (D .L.): Superviso r , District 1, La Paz County, Parker
Winzer, Kimu l et (K i m): Compliance Officer, Un itedHealth Care Community Plan, Phoenix
W r ight, A l exandria : Director, Regional Economic Development Center , Yavapai College, Prescott
3
OBSERVERS
Blume, Kerry : Consultant , Fl agslaff
Brierl ey, Paul: Executive Direc tor, Yuma C enter of Excellence fo r Desert Agriculture, Yuma
Dale, Richard (Dick): Ph ysician (Gene ral & Vascular Su rgery), San Rafae l Medical Cen ter, T ucson
Elli ott·Ne l son , Lind a J.: Dean of Instruc tion, A rizona Western College, Yu ma
Fransway, Heidi : President, Phoenix Speakers Bureau , Scottsdale
Ha ake , K athy : Ret. Manager, Human Resou rces, Salt Rive r Pr oject, Phoenix
Harri s, Charlotte A.: Community Vo l untee r , Tucson
Payne , Toby : Presiden t , T echnically Integ rated, Inc., Cave Creek
Summe r s, Didi : Board Member, Hilton Head Institute, Hilton Head
4
Town Council Regular Session Item # 2.
Meeting Date:11/19/2014
Submitted By:Arinda Asper, Town Manager's Office
Information
Subject
FY 2014-2015 First Quarter Public Safety Providers Reports (July - Sept. 2014)
Attachments
FY 2014-2015 First Quarter Public Safety Providers Reports (July - Sept. 2014)
FY 2014-2015 First Quarter Public Safety Providers Reports (July - Sept. 2014)
FY 2014-2015 First Quarter Public Safety Providers Reports (July - Sept. 2014)
2014 TOTAL JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Total Calls 12878 1423 1325 1402 1410 1432 1324 1491 1595 1476
Commercial Veh Enforcement 166 14 18 23 7 16 19 11 32 26
Residential Burglaries 29 1 2 0 4 4 5 3 5 5
Non-Residential Burglaries 10 0 2 0 2 2 1 2 1 0
All Burglary Attempts 12 2 1 3 1 2 0 0 1 2
Thefts 429 53 31 40 42 38 44 35 56 90
Vehicle Thefts 14 2 3 3 0 0 1 0 3 2
Recovered Stolen Vehicles 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
Attempted Vehicle Thefts 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DUI 138 13 16 24 14 16 12 13 17 13
Liquor Laws 27 3 6 4 1 1 1 3 6 2
Drug Offenses 109 13 17 9 18 18 5 8 10 11
Homicides 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Robbery 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0
Assault 82 5 8 7 12 10 8 10 12 10
Total Arrests 1240 128 169 143 146 139 147 100 146 122
Assigned Cases 610 66 64 59 48 63 64 63 63 120
Alarms (Residential)614 55 49 64 65 73 79 91 84 54
Alarms (Business)350 33 21 29 42 44 51 40 50 40
K9 Searches 366 22 25 21 52 60 20 19 24 123
First Aid Calls 1988 217 204 233 243 247 193 242 219 190
Fatal Accidents**2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
Accidents**410 49 50 50 50 48 41 29 43 50
Citations (Traffic)*3044 438 367 332 394 369 250 405 489 **
Written Warnings/Repair Orders*3966 508 732 396 464 625 254 252 735 **
Public Assists***645 78 81 66 78 77 52 49 93 71
Reserve Man Hours 167 26 ****36 27 55 9 0 14
Business Checks***4275 577 425 363 444 658 416 563 497 332
Drug Task Force Arrest 26 3 0 1 11 3 1 0 2 5
CVAP Dark House Cks 12428 574 586 431 580 1748 1822 2122 2514 2051
CVAP Public Assists 509 52 28 45 67 58 36 52 88 83
CVAP Total Hours 11194.5 1306.5 1238 1323.5 1236.5 1146 1069 1071 1500.5 1303.5
*Traffic data delayed 30 days due to data entry backlog; including the category "Written Warnings/Repair Orders".
**DUI Accidents are included in Fatal Accident and Accident totals.
***"Public Assists" numbers are separated from CVAP Public Assist numbers.
ORO VALLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICE ACTIVITY SUMMARY
Disclaimer: Numbers may show slight fluctuations when compared to previously published reports because of changes in the case data within the system due to normal adjustments. The more recent case
counts are the most likely to fluctuate. Although this data may change slightly, it is as accurate as it can be for the data collected during this time period.
Jul-Sep Jul-Sep Jul-Sep
2012 2013 2014
Total Calls 4192 4216 4562
Commercial Veh Enforcement 88 26 69
Residential Burglaries 15 17 13
Non-Residential Burglaries 4 5 3
All Burglary Attempts 6 3 3
Thefts 125 151 181
Vehicle Thefts 4 9 5
Recovered Stolen Vehicles 3 2 1
Attempted Vehicle Thefts 0 3 0
DUI Arrests 61 33 43
Liquor Laws 5 6 11
Drug Offenses 30 24 29
Homicides 0 0 0
Robbery 0 1 1
Assault 27 43 32
Total Arrests 437 383 368
Assigned Cases 193 225 246
Alarms (Residential)225 232 229
Alarms (Business)127 138 130
K9 Searches 79 60 166
First Aid Calls 680 635 651
Fatal Accidents*1 0 1
Accidents*122 103 122
Citations (Traffic)**1360 1273 **
Written Warnings/Repair Orders**957 1707 **
Public Assists***202 278 213
Reserve Man Hours 226 36 23
Business Checks***1829 2181 1392
Drug Task Force Arrest 10 7 7
CVAP Dark House Cks 4554 4762 6687
CVAP Public Assists 197 188 223
CVAP Total Hours 3278.5 3202.5 3875
***"Business checks" now a separate category from "Dark House Checks". Public Assist totals no longer include CVAP numbers.
Third Quarter 2014
*"Fatal Accidents" & "Accidents" categories now include DUI-related fatal accidents & accidents. Numbers subject to fluctuate slightly due to
reclassification.
**"Written Warnings/Repair Orders" category now replaces "Warnings" and "Repair Orders" categories. Previous year totals updated to reflect the change.
Traffic data delayed for data entry backlog.
ORO VALLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT
MONTHLY BREAKDOWN OF CITATIONS BY VIOLATION
Citations 2014 TOTAL JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
TOWN CODE 176 28 24 15 21 27 32 22 7
SIZE, WEIGHT, LOAD 5 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 1
INSURANCE VIOLATION 713 102 79 71 78 76 52 104 151
REGISTRATION VIOLATION 305 39 40 46 23 34 31 39 53
DRIVERS LICENSE VIOLATION 281 36 42 26 34 40 30 29 44
DUI ARRESTS 125 13 16 24 14 16 12 17 13
RECKLESS/AGGRESSIVE DRIVING 10 0 1 0 0 2 4 1 2
SPEEDING 1014 156 123 90 157 120 61 162 145
LANE VIOLATIONS 129 20 10 20 17 21 16 11 14
RED LIGHT 75 14 9 6 13 4 11 9 9
STOP SIGN 32 5 0 5 8 6 1 2 5
FAILURE TO YIELD 57 9 9 7 6 13 5 3 5
SEATBELT VIOLATION 62 6 9 6 6 3 6 7 19
CHILD RESTRAINT 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4
EQUIPMENT VIOLATIONS 49 5 3 9 3 11 3 5 10
PARKING 7 0 0 1 2 2 1 0 1
LITTERING 5 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0
OTHER CITATIONS 170 32 25 20 32 20 13 15 13
Total Citations 3044 438 367 332 394 369 250 405 489 0 0 0 0
Based on further investigation and updating of information, actual classifications may change resulting in small variances in counts.
*DUIs are arrest counts, not citations counts
TITLE 28 VIOLATIONS
# of calls %# of calls %
49 83%167 88%
10 17%22 12%
Total Calls Total Calls
# of calls %# of calls %
971 95%2362 99%
47 5%35 1%
Total Calls Total Calls
ORO VALLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT
July through September 2014
Priority 1 Priority 2
Total Response Time Total Response Time
Goal: Total Response <5 minutes 90% of the time Goal: Total Response <8 minutes 90% of the time
< 5 minutes < 8 minutes
> 5 minutes > 8 minutes
59 189
Average Overall Response Time 3:32 Average Overall Response Time 5:00
Priority 3 Priority 4
Total Response Time Total Response Time
Goal: Total Response <15 minutes 90% of the time Goal: Total Response <30 minutes 90% of the time
< 15 minutes < 30 minutes
> 15 minutes > 30 minutes
1018 2397
Average Overall Response Time 7:32 Average Overall Response Time 7:55
Golder Ranch Fire District -Oro Valley
Call Summary
1st Quarter FY 2014-2015 (July -September 2014)
Sun City Station 374 # of calls 0/0
Dispatch to At Scene <5 :00 minutes -EMS 211 67%
Dispatch to At Sc ene <6:00 minutes -FIRE 0
Average Dispatch to At Scene Time 4:54
Woodburne Station 375 # of calls 0/0
Dispatch to At Scene <5 :00 minutes -EMS 364 69%
Dispatch to At Scene <6 :00 minutes -FIRE 3 100%
Average Dispatch to At Scene Time 4:52
Lambert Station 376 # of calls 0/0
Dispatch to At Scene <5 :00 minutes -EMS 110 55%
Dispatch to At Scene <6 :00 minutes -FIRE 2 0%
Average Dispatch to At Scene Time 5:00
Oracle Rd. Station 377 # of calls 0/0
Dispatch to At Scene <5 :00 minutes -EMS 182 76%
Dispatch to At Scen e <6 :00 minute s -FIRE I 100%
Average Dispatch to At Scene Time 4:47
Average Total All Oro Valley Stations # of calls %
Dispatch to At Scene <5 :00 minutes -EMS 867 67%
Di s patch to At Scene <6 :00 m inute s -FIRE 6 66%
Average Dispatch to At Scene Time 4:53
Average Total All Oro ValleyStations _2nd Fire Unit # of calls %
2nd Fire Unit Di spatch to At Scene <8:00 m inutes -FIRE 4 I 75%
Average Dispatch to At Scene Time for 2 '''1 Fire Unit 6:53
Golder Ranch -Oro Valley Call Load Breakdown
First Quarter FY 2014·2015 (July· September 2014)
Final Type Reference
CALL TYPE Sun City Woodburne Lambert Oracle
Aircraft
Brush! Vegetation 2
Building
Electrical ! Motor 1 1
Fires -All Other 4 1 2
Gas Leak 1 2 1
Hazmat 4
Trash ! Rubish 1
Unauthorized Burning 1
Vehicle 3 1
Total Fire Calls 1 5 9 10
I
Animal Problem
Anima l Rescue 1
Assist -Other 18 44 10 23
Battery Change 5 4 10 5
Bee Swarm 1 1
Defective Appliance 1
Invalid Assist 45 19 22 26
Snake 116 174 88 132
Lockout 1
Fire Now Out
Total Service Calls 184 243 132 187
I
Alarms (Fire, Smoke. CO) 11 20 9 15
Cance ll ed! Negative Incident 13 19 4 18
Smoke! Odor In vestaqation 3 3 4
Total Good Intent Calls 27 42 13 37
I
Motor Vehicle Accide nt 3 9 5 13
Rescue (high , trench , wate r ) 5 1 2
All Oth er EM S In c idents 208 350 104 167
Total EMS Type Calls 211 364 110 182
I
TOTAL ALL CALLS 423 654 264 416
,-TOTAL
2
2
7
4
4
1
1
4
25
I
1
95
24
2
1
112
510
1
746
I
55
54
10
119
I
30
8
829
867
I
,-1757
Golder Ranch Fire District -Oro Valley
Detailed Fire Response Report
First Quarter FY 2014-2015
(July -September 2014)
Date Call# Type Disp. Time U nit Respond On-scene Total Res p. Time
7/3114 1432 2 BUILD 01:11:23 EN376 01:13 :35 01:19:19 7:56
St.376 LT375 01: 12:37 01 :20 : 13 8:50
Report of an odor of s moke and a la rm s so unding from large bui ld ing on Como Rd. EN376 in vest iga tin g
to di scove r food o n stove. NEGATIV E INCIDENT
Date Call # Type Disp .. time Un it Respond On-scene Total Resp. Time
7/4114 1447 3 APTS 10 :45 :30 EN376 10:4 6:43 10:51 :12 5:42
St.377 EN377 10 :47:12 10 :5 1:22 5:52
C hild called 9 11 to report a fire in an a partme nt w ith no pare nt s hom e. Food was found burnt on the
stove , a ll othe r unit s can cance l. NEGATIV E INC ID EN T.
Date Ca ll # Type Di sp. time Uni t Res pond On-scene Total Resp. Time
711 711 4 15658 BUILD 11:4 5 :10 EN377 11:46 :07 11:4 9:16 4:06
St.375 EN376 11 :50:54 5:44
Reported as s moke coming out of HV AC unit -smell s as if so methin g is burning. In c ide nt isolated to a
faul ty HVAC un it , no other fire prob le m. NEGATI VE INCIDENT .
Date Call # TYl'e Disp. time Unit Res pond On-scene Total Resp. Time
8/26114 19183 HO USE 18:07 :34 LT375 18:08:09 18 :1 2:52 5:18
St.375 EN376 18 :08:45 18 :1 5:04 7:30
Ca ll er smell s so methin g burn in g and sees s moke and flames com in g from the side of a ho use. Cr ews
found that an o ut s id e e lec tri ca l ou tl e t had shorted and caug ht fire, but d id not ex tend into th e structure.
NE GATIVE INC ID ENT.
Date Call # Type Disp. time Unit Respond On-scene Total Resp. Time
8/27114 19255 HOUSE 14:4 6:48 LT37 5 14 :47:2 0 14:52 :03 5:15
St.375
Ca llin g party re ported that th ey were bakin g with th e ove n and it bega n to produce flames and smoke.
LT375 upon a rri va l found nothing show in g and to s hut down re sponding unit s . Burnt food in oven.
NE GATIVE INCID ENT.
Date Call # Type Di sp. time Unit Respond On-scene Total Resp. Time
8/30114 195 18 APTS 10:12:44 EN377 10 :1 3:19 10:20 :06 7:22
St.376
Ca ll er report s that th e top of th e ir stove is on fire in th e ir apartment. BC377 a rri ved first o n sce ne to
report the fire is now out and to cont inu e on ly o ne en g in e into scene. Defecti ve app li a nce . NEGATIVE
INC IDENT.
Golder Ranch Fire District -First Quarter FY 2014-2015 (July -Sept. 2014) -Oro Vall ey Report Summary
All GRFD Oro Valley Stations Time #of Calls Adopted Standard % Actual % Description of Va rian ce
Dispatch to At Scene -FIRE I < 6 :00 6 90% 66%
Time to achieve Adopted Standard o f 90% 7:56
Average Dispatch to At Sc ene Time 5:53
Dispatch to At Scene -EMS < 5:00 867 90% 67% Gated community
Time to achieve Adopted Sta ndard of 90% 7:05 Steep narrow roads
Must navJllate ma~residential streets
Far end of first due
Gate did not open with Opticom
Winding side streets
Dirt road condi tions
Average Dispatch to At Scene Time 4 :53
2nd Fire Unit Dispatch to At Sce ne < 8:00 4 90% 75%
Time to achieve Adopted Standard of 90% 8 :50
Average Dispatch to At Sce ne Time 6 :53 ,
SWA -Oro Valley Transport Units Time #01 Calls Adopted Actual % De sc riptio n of Variance
Dispatch to At Scene -ALS Transport Unit < 8 :00 350 90% 94% Calls are in comp lian ce
Time to achieve Ado ted Standard of 90 % Achieved
Average Dispatch to At Scene Time 7 :34
Mountain Vista Fire District· Oro Valley
Call Summary
1st Quarter FY 2014·2015 (July -Sept. 2014)
Station 610 (Mal!;ee Rd.) # of calls 0/0
Dispatch to At Scene <5:00 minutes -EMS 45 62%
Dispatch to At Scene <6:00 minutes -FIRE 15 80%
Averal!;e Dispatch to At Scene Time 4:51
Station 620 (Shannon Rd.) # of calls %
Dispatch to At Scene <5:00 minutes -EMS 0 0%
Dispatch to At Scene <6:00 minutes -FIRE 2 0%
Average Dispatch to At Scene Time 10:21
Average Total All Oro Valley Stations # of calls 0/0
Dispatch to At Scene <5: 00 minutes -EMS 45 62%
Dispatch to At Scene <6:00 minutes -FIRE 17 71%
Average Dispatch tu At Scene Time 5:02
Averal!;e Total All Oro Valley Stations _2od Fire U nit # of calls %
2 nd Fire Unit Dispatch to At Scene <8:00 minutes -FIRE 2 I 50%
Averal!;e Dispatch to At Scene Time for 2 nd Fire Unit 8:04
Mountain Vista Fire District -Oro Valley Call Load Breakdown
First Quarter FY 2014-2015 (July -September 2014)
Final Type Reference
CALL TYPE MVFD
Aircraft
Brush I VeQetation 2
Building
Electrical I Motor
Fires -All Other 1
Gas Leak 1
Hazmat
Trash I Rubish
Unauthorized Burning
Vehicle 5
Total Fire Calls 9
l '. . .
A nimal Problem
A nimal Rescue
Ass ist -Other
Battery Cha nge
Bee Swarm
Defective Appliance
Invalid Assist 5
Snake 27
Lockout 2
Fire Now Out
Total Service Calls 34
I ,. .o~>
Alarms (Fire, Smoke . CO) 6
Cancelled I Negative In cident 1
Smoke I Odor I nvestagation 2
Total Good Intent Calls 9
I
Motor Vehicle Accide nt
Rescue (high , trench , wa ter) 3
All Other EMS Incidents 79
Total EMS Type Calls 82
I
TOTAL ALL CALLS 134
Mountain Vista Fire District -Oro Valley
Detailed Fire Response Report
First Quarter FY 2014·2015 (July. September 2014)
Call# Type IDisp. Time Unit Respond On-scene Total Resp. Time
7/9/2014 N141900056 FUNK 14:21:46 EN610 14:22:59 14:27:15 0:05:29
St. 610
UIA FOUND LIGHT SMOKE COMING FROM A RESIDENCE ON GLENHURST DR. UPON TRACKING
DOWN THE SOURCE OF THE FIRE, FOUND THAT HOMEOWNER WAS BURING SOME
LANDSCAPING THAT HE HAD IN A PILE ABOUT 50 FEET FROM HIS HOUSE. BRUSH FIRE WAS
ABOUT 7 BY 7 OWNER HAD A V AILD BURN PERMIT FROM THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY.
NEGATIVE INCIDENT.
Date Call# Type Disp. 'Fime 1:Jnit Respond On-scene Total Resp. Time
7/13 /2014 N141940061 ALM 17:42:09 EN610 17:43:47 17:47:43 0:05:34
St. 610
VIA FOUND MULTI-BUILDING EDUCATIONAL COMPLEX WITH NOTHING SHOWING.BUILDING
CLEARED, NO SIGNS OF SMOKE OR FLAME. RP MADE CONTACT WITH ELECTRICIAN WHO
INSTALLED THE SYSTEM,HESTATED IT WAS A WIRING ISSUE AND HE WAS AWARE OF IT.
ELECTRICIAN INFO PROVIDED TO THE ALARM ROOM AT THEIR REQUEST. E610 UNABLE TO
COMPLETELY SILENCE THE ALARM, IT KEPT SOUNDING AFTER BEING RESET. NO SIGN OF FIRE
PROBLEM LOCATED IN ENTIRE COMPLEX. NEGATIVE INCIDENT.
IDate Call# 'Fype Disp. Time Unit Respond On-scene Total Resp. Time
7/14 /2014 N141950018 ALM 9:09:41 EN610 9:10:25 9:l3:53 0:04:12
St. 610
E610 RESPONDED CODE 3 FOR FIRE ALARM SOUNDING. UI A NEG FIRE PROBLEM.
MAINTENANCE CREW WAS WORKING ON THE HOOD SYSTEM IN THE KITCHEN. NEGATIVE
INCIDENT .
Date Call# Type Disp. Time Unit Respond On-scene Total Resp. Time
7/28 /2014 N142090067 CAR 15:10:31 EN610 15:11:54 15:l3:58 0:03:27
St. 610
DISPATCHED TO CAR FIRE. UI A, OVPD HAD EXTINGUISHED WITH FIRE EXTINGUSIHER, NO
INJURIES. WORKING INCIDENT .
Date Call# Type Disp. Time Unit Respond On-scene Total Resp. Time
7/28 /2014 N142090074 ALM 16:19:23 EN610 16:20:51 16:25:11 0:05:48
St. 610
FIRE ALARM SOUNDING, NO FIRE SHOWING, HOWEVER ALARM STILL ACTIVE. ALARM
COMPANY NOTIFED THAT EVENT WAS A FALSE ALARM . NEGATIVE INCIDENT .
Date Call# Type Disp. Time Unit Respond On-scene Total Resp. Time
8/5/2014 N142170027 CAR 8:00:28 EN620 8:01 :29 8:09:56 0:09:28
St. 620
u/A, CAR SMOKING IN THE PARKING LOT, CAR IS PARKED IN THE PARKING LOT ON THE EAST
SIDE OF THE COMPLEX. OWNER CONTACTED BY ENGINE 620 WHOM ADVISED THAT THERE
WAS NO FIRE; CAR JUST BURNS OIL WHEN RUNNING. NEGATIVE INCIDENT
Date Call# Type Disp . Time Unit Respond On-scene Total Resp. Time
8110 /2014 N142220058 BLDG 16:48:16 EN610 16:48:45 16:51:49 0:03:33
St. 610
"FAMOUS SAMS" RESTURANT. DISPATCHED TO SMOKE IN THE BUILDING AND THEY WERE
ADVISED TO EVACUATE. UI A, SMOKE IS COMING FROM CEILING AND VENTS; SMELLS LIKE
EELECTRICAL FIRE. NO FIRE FOUND UPON INVESTIGATION, SOURCE OF SMOKE WAS FOUND
TO BE THE AC UNIT ON ROOF, UNIT SHUT DOWN, NO FURTHER ISSUES. WORKING INCIDENT.
Date Call# Type ]i)isp. 'Fime Unit Respond On-scene Total Resp. Time
811112014 N142230067 APTS 19:01 :45 EN610 19:03:04 19:06:33 0:04:48
St. 610
FIRE IN OVEN FROM PLASTIC CUTTING BOARD LEFT INSIDE OVEN. CALLING PARTY HAD
TURNED OFF OVEN WITH FIRE IS STILL GOING. FIRE OUT ON ENGINE 610 ARRIVAL, CONTAINED
TO OVEN. NEGATIVE INCIDENT.
Date Call# Type Disp. Time Unit Respond On-scene Total Resp. Time
8114 /2014 N142260011 ALM 10:07:58 EN610 10:08:54 10:12:06 0:04:08
st. 610
DENTAL OFFICE ALARM IS GOING OFF, CALLER DOES NOT SEE NOR SMELLS ANYTHING-
THINKS IT WAS HIT ACCIDENT ALLY WHILE CLEANING. NEGATIVE INCIDENT .
2
Date Call# Type Disp. Time Unit Respond On-scene Total Resp. Time
8/20 /2014 N142320031 ODOR 9:51 :04 LD610 9:51:50 9:56:44 0:05:40
St. 610
REPORT OF ODOR OF GAS IN BUILDING. LADDER 610 PERSONNEL ASSESSED THE RESTROOMS
AND NOTICED A NOXIOUS ODOR BELIEVED TO BE SEWAGE GAS. PERSONNEL ALSO ASSESSED
THE OFFICES IN THE BUILDING AND FOUND NO ODOR IN ANY OF THE OCCUPANCIES. NEGATIVE
NATURAL GAS SERVICE TO THE BUILDING. THE RESTROOM DOORS WERE PROPPED OPEN AND
THE SMELL BEGAN TO DISSIPATE. NEGATIVE INCIDENT .
Date Call# Type Disp. Time Unit Respond On-scene Total Resp. Time
812112014 N142330060 CAR 13:56:30 LD610 13:57:44 14:01 :20 0:04:50
St. 610
DISPATCHED TO SPROUTS PARKING LOT FOR PICKUP ON FIRE IN PARKING LOT. CALLER ON
SCENE PUT FIRE OUT WITH EXTINGUISHER, FIRE OUT O N ARRIVAL. SCENE TURNED OVER TO
OVPD. NEGATIVE INCIDENT.
Date Call# Type Disp. Time Unit Respond On-scene Total Resp. Time
8127 /2014 N142390018 CAR 8:09:51 LD610 8:11:53 8:15:09 0:05:18
St. 610
MV A-CAR CAUGHT ON FIRE. OVPD ADVISED THAT THIS IS A HYBRID VEHICLE INVOLVED I N A
MINOR CRASH WHICH TURNED INTO A VEHICLE FIRE. WORKING INCIDENT.
Date Call# T ype IDisp. Time Unit Respond On-scene Total Resp. Time
9115 /2014 N142580028 FUNK 8:24:55 EN610 8:26:11 8:31 :06 0:06: 11
St. 610
SMOKE I N THE AREA.OVPD ON SCENE WITH HOMEOWNER AND ADVISES NOT SURE WHAT IS
BURNING. FOUND TO BE AN ILLEGAL BURN , CONTACT WITH HOMEOWNER WAS MADE AND
EN GlL'IE 620 FOUND THE FIRE TO BE OUT. NEGATIVE INCIDENT .
Date Call# Type Ji)isp. Time Unit Respond On-scene Totall Resp. Time
9/25 /2014 N142680067 ODOR 18:46:38 EN610 18:48:45 18:55:11 0:08:33
St. 610
REPORTED SMELL OF GAS IN BACK YARD. E610 SEARCHED THE AREA AND RESIDENCE WITH NO
HAZARDOUS ODORS OR INDICATIONS OF HAZARDS LOCATED. ALSO, NO SMELL OF NATURAL
GAS NOTICED. E610 CONTACTED SOUTHWEST GAS . E610 INVESTIGATED APPLIANCES, NO ISSUES
FOUND. NEGATIVE INCIDENT.
3
Mountain Vista Fire District -First Quarter FY 2014-2015 (July -Sept. 2014) -Oro Valley Report Summary
All MVFD Oro Valley Stations Time #of Calls Adopted Standard % Actual % Description of Variance
Dispatch to At Scene -FIRE I < 6 :00 17 90 % 7 1%
Time to achieve Adopted Standard of 90%
Average Dispatch to At Scene Time 5:37
Dispatch to At Scene -EMS I < 5:00 45 90 % 62%
Time to achieve Adopted Standard of 90%
Average Dispatch to At Scene Time 4 :49
2nd Fire Unit Dispatch to At Scene < 8:00 2 90 % 50 %
Time to achieve Adopted Standard of 90%
Average Dispatch to At Scene Time 8:04
Town Council Regular Session Item # 3.
Meeting Date:11/19/2014
Submitted By:Catherine Hendrix, Police Department
Information
Subject
Letter of Appreciation - Oro Valley Police Department
Attachments
Appreciation Letter 102814
ATTORNEY S AT LAW
October 28,2014
Daniel G. Sharp, Chief of Police
Oro Valley Police Department
11000 N. La Canada Dr.
Oro Valley , AZ 85737
Dear Chief Sharp :
A PROFESS IO NAL A S.<;OC IAT10N
For the last 25 years we have been "snowbirds" spending a fair amount of
time in Tucson. Our present residence is at 909 West Linda Vista.
We are delighted that you make available the "Dark House" program .
Enclosed I am returning the "Citizen Survey".
I do want you to know that we have met y our officers on several occasions
and never imagined that a police force could be so professional, pleasant,
helpful and accommodating.
In my opinion the skill and professionalism of your officers is on the top of
the lis of attributes that make Oro Valley suc h a pleasant c community.
With
James an
Direct Di
jschweb
JRS j k
Enclosu
ary Schwebel
umber: (612) 344-0306
chwebel.com
James R. Schwebel t * * • /I
John C. Goerz t * *
William R. Sieben t § • /I
Ri chard 1. Tou signanrt * §
Pecer W. Riley t * §
William A. Cranda ll t •
Pau l E. Godlewski t • §
J ames S. Ba ll entine :I:
Cole J. Dixon
Ma rk H . Gruesne r t *
Max H . H ac ker
Counney A . Lawrrnc('
Roben L. Lazear
Richard J. Nygaard § •
Robe n J. Schmicz § :I:
Alicia N. Siebe n
La rry E. Seem * ,
J a mes G. \'Qeinmeye r § *
• Crrtifml by tlx N"tion,,1
BO<lrd ~f Tri,,1 t\flr .... "CJ tIS
" Cil'if 'f.-i,,1 S/>«i"li<t
§ T bt B.,t Ltl~ iN Amtrff"
W.,oow:nd \Vh i [~, Inc.
, Inll't'NaliONol Stxwy of (j"rr;J/ffl
1: ,lIso limlltd;,/ W'I
" Alu U(fmtti iN ND
",oo;"d b,/
Q,o Vu!ley Police Dept.
5 120 IDS Cenn:r, HO Sou th Ei,g luh S tre er, Minneapolis, Minnesora 55402·2246
t\'l inneapol is: 6 12·377·7777 T o ll Free: 800 ·752-4265
www.schwebel.com
Town Council Regular Session Item # 1.
Meeting Date:11/19/2014
Presentation of Certificates to graduates of the Community Academy - Local Governance 101 class
Information
Subject
Presentation of Certificates to graduates of the Community Academy - Local Governance 101 class
Summary
The Town of Oro Valley is pleased to recognize the graduates of the Town's Community Academy-Local
Governance 101 class.
The classes covered a variety of topics, including:
Oro Valley in 2014 and Beyond
Your Voice, Our Future
Town Finances
Environmental Stewardship and Conservation
Elements of a Complete Community
Town Development
Public Safety
The Community Academy provides an opportunity to learn more about the Town and serves to inform,
educate, and engage residents to be active participants in building and sustaining their community. This
session included a number of topics related to the Your Voice, Our Future project and class members
included Your Voice Committee members, Board and Commission members, and Town residents. The
18 members of the graduating class are listed below:
Bill Adler
Jennifer Bott
Diane Bristow
Don Bristow
Teresa Fitzgerald
Tom Gribb
Gene Klett
Greg Klett
Doug McKee
Cathy Robson
Jon Robson
Ann Spahn
Karen Stratman
Casey Streubek
Beverly Van Horn
Fred Wayand
Joseph Winfield
Stan Winetroe
Community Academy classes specialized for each Board and Commission are scheduled to begin in the
Spring.
Town Council Regular Session Item # 2.
Meeting Date:11/19/2014
Proclamation - Giving Tuesday
Information
Subject
Proclamation - Giving Tuesday
Summary
Attachments
Proclamation
rY/Ilee 0/ tltA3~
®rll ~alh~\!, ~izllna
Jrndcuucttinn
GIVING TUESDAY
DECEMBER 2,2014
WHEREAS, Giving Tuesday was established as a national day of giving on the Tuesday
following Thanksgiving ; and
WHEREAS, Giving Tuesday is a celebration of philanthropy and volunteerism where people give
whatever they are able to give; and
WHEREAS, Giving Tuesday is a day where citizens work together to share commitments, rally
for favorite causes, build a stronger community, and think about other people; and
WHEREAS, it is fitting and proper on Giving Tuesday and on every day to recognize the
tremendous impact of philanthropy, volunteerism , and community service in the Town of Oro
Valley; and
WHEREAS, Giving Tuesday is an opportunity to encourage citizens to serve others throughout
this holiday season and during other times of the year.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Dr. Satish I. Hiremath, Mayor of the Town of Oro Valley, hereby proclaim
December 2, 2014 as Giving Tuesday in the Town of Oro Valley and encourage all citizens to
join together to give back to the community in any way that is personally meaningful.
Dated this 19 1h day of November, 2014
ATTEST:
1h.47;;-c t£~
Dr. Satish I. Hiremath , Mayor
Town Council Regular Session Item # A.
Meeting Date:11/19/2014
Requested by: Julie Bower Submitted By:Mike Standish, Town Clerk's Office
Department:Town Clerk's Office
Information
SUBJECT:
Minutes - November 5, 2014
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
N/A
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to (approve, approve with the following changes) the November 5, 2014 minutes.
Attachments
11/5/14 Draft Minutes
11/5/14 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 1
MINUTES
ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL
REGULAR SESSION
November 5, 2014
ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE
REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Hiremath called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:Satish Hiremath, Mayor
Lou Waters, Vice Mayor
Brendan Burns, Councilmember
Joe Hornat, Councilmember
Mary Snider, Councilmember
Mike Zinkin, Councilmember
ABSENT:Bill Garner, Councilmember
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Hiremath led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance.
SWEARING IN OF NEWLY ELECTED MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS
Town Clerk Julie Bower swore in Councilmember Hornat, Councilmember Mary Snider,
Vice Mayor Lou Waters and Mayor Hiremath to four-year terms effective November 5,
2014 through November 7, 2018.
Mayor Hiremath recessed the meeting at 6:06 p.m.
Mayor Hiremath reconvened the meeting at 6:12 p.m.
COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Hornat referenced a letter that he received from a third-grader at
Painted Sky Elementary.
Councilmember Snider reported that Councilmember Hornat and she attended the Safe
Treats event on Halloween.
11/5/14 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 2
Councilmember Zinkin announced that the Ironwood Ridge High school football
team would be competing in the State Championship game.
Mayor Hiremath recognized Police Chief Danny Sharp for receiving the 2014 J.
Stannard Baker Award from the International Association of Chiefs of Police & the
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and the Northwestern University’s
Center for Public Safety.
Mayor Hiremath gave an overview of the public meeting process.
Vice Mayor Lou Waters said on Tuesday, November 11th, an event entitled "Dare to be
100" would be held in the Oro Valley Council Chambers at which Dr. Walter Bortz II
would be interviewed on the subject of aging in America.
UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS
Economic Development Manager Amanda Jacobs announced the upcoming town
meetings and events.
DEPARTMENT REPORTS
Town Clerk Julie Bower announced that new artwork was on display in the Council
Chambers by artist Carolann Small.
ORDER OF BUSINESS
Mayor Hiremath said the agenda would stand as posted.
CALL TO AUDIENCE
Dave Perry, President and CEO of the Greater Oro Valley Chamber of Commerce and
Oro Valley resident, spoke about the La Posada retirement community located at Park
Center in Green Valley and encouraged Council and staff to visit the retirement
community.
PRESENTATIONS
1.Introduction of Youth Advisory Council Members
Assistant to the Town Manager Chris Cornelison introduced the following members of
the Youth Advisory Council:
Charles Huang, President, Basis Oro Valley
Vanessa Van Scyoc, Vice President, Ironwood Ridge High School
ShoYoung Shin, Secretary, Basis Oro Valley
Sophia Silva, Treasurer, Basis Oro Valley
11/5/14 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 3
Tessa Nardozza, Historian, Basis Oro Valley
Samantha DiPalma, Basis Oro Valley
Ani Ehramjian, Ironwood Ridge High School
Sydney Hecht, Basis Oro Valley
Terika Horton, Ironwood Ridge High School
Danika Lunnon, Basis Oro Valley
Yorick Oden-Plants, Basis Oro Valley
Abigail Price, Ironwood Ridge High School
Sophie Sandweiss, Basis Oro Valley
Christian Schmidt, Basis Oro Valley
Samuel Sepulveda, Ironwood Ridge High School
Rav Singh, Basis Oro Valley
Christian Trejo, Canyon Del Oro High School
Kaitlyn Vlahoulis, Canyon Del Oro High School
Jennifer Xiao, Basis Oro Valley
CONSENT AGENDA
Councilmember Zinkin requested that items (B) and (C) be removed from the Consent
Agenda for discussion.
A.Minutes - October 15, 2014
MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Zinkin and seconded by
Councilmember Hornat to approve item (A).
MOTION carried, 6-0.
B.Request for approval of a two year extension for the Big Horn Commerce
Center Development Plan located at the southeast corner of Oracle Road
and Ram’s Field Pass
Councilmember Zinkin expressed concerns regarding the proposed extension of the
development plan.
Discussion ensued amongst Council regarding the proposed extension.
MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Snider and seconded by Vice Mayor
Waters to approve item (B).
MOTION carried, 5-1 with Councilmember Zinkin opposed.
C.Resolution No. (R)14-56, authorizing and approving the Arizona Mutual Aid
Compact between the Town of Oro Valley and the Arizona Department of
Emergency and Military Affairs
11/5/14 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 4
Councilmember Zinkin asked who the participating parties of the agreement were and
how reimbursement would take place.
Oro Valley Police Department Commander Jason Larter said the parties consisted of
neighboring political subdivisions. Reimbursement would depend on the cost and
duration of the event.
MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Zinkin and seconded by
Councilmember Snider to approve Resolution No. (R)14-56, authorizing and approving
the Arizona Mutual Aid Compact between the Town of Oro Valley and the Arizona
Department of Emergency and Military Affairs.
MOTION carried, 6-0.
REGULAR AGENDA
1.RECONSIDERATION OF THE OCTOBER 1, 2014, CONDITION OF APPROVAL
OF ORDINANCE NO. (O)14-03, SPECIFICALLY THE CONDITION THAT
THERE BE SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION OF PARK AMENITIES BEFORE
GRADING PERMITS SHALL BE ISSUED
Councilmember Hornat gave an overview of item #1.
MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Hornat and seconded by Vice Mayor
Waters to amend the additional condition added to the approval of Ordinance No.
(O)14-13 on October 1, 2014, to read as follows:
The amount of funding provided for use of Hohokam Park as a recreation area must be
equivalent to the full development cost of a park meeting non-PAD zoning code
requirements for this development, which has been determined to be $75,000.
This funding must be entirely used to increase the number or type of recreational
amenities within the park facility. Examples of such improvements include additional
play or sports equipment or expansion of the park facility. The monies shall not be used
for the repair, dog park replacement or remodeling of existing facilities or for ongoing
park operations or maintenance.
A signed letter from the developer/owner to the Town, verifying that an agreement is in
place committing builder/developer to paying Rancho Vistoso HOA the sum of $75,000,
along with language indicating that the money will be used in compliance with this
condition, shall be provided prior to issuance of any home building permit in order to
certify compliance with this rezoning condition.
MOTION carried, 6-0.
2.DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE DIRECTION IN REGARD TO AMENDING
11/5/14 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 5
ZONING CODE SECTION 22.15(F), ENTITLED, NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING
REQUIREMENTS
Councilmember Zinkin presented his recommendations regarding neighborhood
meeting requirements.
Discussion ensued amongst Council regarding neighborhood meeting requirements.
The Town Council directed Town Manager, Greg Caton, to review the Neighborhood
Meeting Standard Operating Procedure (S.O.P.) to ensure conformance with Town
Code requirements.
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Councilmember Zinkin requested a future agenda item for January, 2015, to discuss
and provide possible direction regarding sign illumination standards, seconded by Vice
Mayor Waters.
CALL TO AUDIENCE
No comments were received.
ADJOURNMENT
MOTION:A motion was made by Vice Mayor Waters and seconded by Councilmember
Snider to adjourn the meeting at 7:12 p.m.
MOTION carried, 6-0.
Prepared by:
_________________________
Michael Standish, CMC
Deputy Town Clerk
I hereby certify the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the
regular session of the Town of Oro Valley Council of Oro Valley, Arizona held on the 5th
day of November, 2014. I further certify that the meeting was duly called and held and
that a quorum was present.
Dated this _____ day of ______________________, 2014.
____________________________
Julie K. Bower, MMC
Town Clerk
Town Council Regular Session Item # B.
Meeting Date:11/19/2014
Requested by: Stacey Lemos Submitted By:Wendy Gomez, Finance
Department:Finance
Information
SUBJECT:
Fiscal Year 2014/15 Financial Update through September 2014
RECOMMENDATION:
This item is for information only.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
In the General Fund (see attachment A), revenues collected through September totaled $7.2 million, or
22.2% of the budget amount of $32.3 million. Year-to-date expenditures through September totaled $6.5
million, or 19.9% of the budget amount of $32.5 million. Please note that the expenditure budget
includes the authorized use of contingency reserves in the amount of $190,000 to fund the purchase of a
modular building to address Town space needs, including the on-site health clinic, which was approved
by Council on July 2, 2014. This amount is included in the budgeted transfer out to the General
Government CIP Fund.
In the Highway Fund (see attachment B), revenues collected through September totaled $741,742, or
25.0% of the budget amount of $3.0 million. Year-to-date expenditures through September totaled
$654,300, or 15.0% of the budget amount of $4.4 million. It is important to note that the Highway Fund
budget includes the planned use of $1.4 million in reserves, as all construction sales tax revenues are
now fully accounted for in the General Fund.
In the Bed Tax Fund (see attachment C), revenues collected through September totaled $191,760, or
20.2% of the budget amount of $949,000. Year-to-date expenditures through September totaled
$247,258, or 25.7% of the budget amount of $961,000.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
GENERAL FUND
Attachment A shows General Fund revenues and expenditures through September, as well as year-end
estimates for each category. The estimated year-end projections in the General Fund are as follows:
Revenues $32,401,803
Less:
Expenditures ($32,309,768)
Est. Increase in Fund Balance $ 92,035
General Fund Revenues
Local sales tax collections in the General Fund total $3.3 million or 21.4% of the budget amount of
$15.7 million. Sales tax collections in the General Fund are estimated to come in on budget at this
time. Please note the inclusion of a new, additional attachment (Attachment E), which will
track General Fund local sales tax collections on a monthly basis, including construction
and utility sales tax.
Federal Grant revenues are estimated to come in over budget by about $44,000 or 7.4%, due to
grant funds received for a Police DUI Tahoe funded by the Governor's Office of Highway Safety.
Charges for Services revenues are estimated to come in over budget by about $81,000 or 4.8%,
due primarily to revenue trends at the Aquatic Center and zoning & subdivision fees.
Interest Income collections through September reflect unrealized interest losses in July and
September, which are expected to be recovered throughout the remainder of the fiscal year.
Staff will continue to monitor revenue collections and may adjust the year-end estimates based on actual
trends.
General Fund Expenditures
Expenditures are estimated to come in under budget by nearly $147,000 or 0.5%, due to projected
vacancy savings. Note that these savings are estimates and are subject to change.
HIGHWAY FUND
Highway Fund Revenues
State shared highway user funds total $695,600, or 25.2% of the budget amount of $2.8 million and
are estimated to come in on budget at this time.
Highway Fund Expenditures
Expenditures are estimated to come in on budget at this time.
BED TAX FUND
Bed Tax Revenues
Bed tax revenues total $192,251, or 20.4% of the budget amount of $945,000 and are estimated to
come in on budget at this time.
Bed Tax Fund Expenditures
Expenditures are estimated to come in on budget at this time.
Please see Attachments A, B, and C for additional details on the General Fund, Highway Fund and Bed
Tax Fund respectively. See Attachment D for a fiscal year-to-date consolidated summary of all Town
funds. In addition, as noted earlier, a new Attachment E is included with a breakdown of monthly local
sales tax collections for the General Fund.
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
N/A
SUGGESTED MOTION:
This item is for information only.
Attachments
Attachment A - General Fund
Attachment B - HW Fund
Attachment C - Bed Tax Fund
Attachment D - Summary All Funds
Attachment E - GF Local Sales Tax
ATTACHMENT A
September YTD Financial Status
General Fund
% Budget Completion through September --- 25%
% Actuals YE % Variance
to Budget to Budget
REVENUES:
LOCAL SALES TAX 3,348,594 15,676,905 21.4% 15,676,905 0.0%
LICENSES & PERMITS 365,383 1,805,547 20.2% 1,805,547 0.0%
FEDERAL GRANTS 239,330 597,365 40.1% 641,676 7.4%
STATE GRANTS 202,778 1,607,300 12.6% 1,607,300 0.0%
STATE/COUNTY SHARED 2,485,106 10,303,762 24.1% 10,303,762 0.0%
OTHER INTERGOVERNMENTAL - 15,000 0.0% 15,000 0.0%
CHARGES FOR SERVICES 495,690 1,688,995 29.3% 1,770,488 4.8%
FINES 36,139 180,000 20.1% 180,000 0.0%
INTEREST INCOME (10,482) 81,125 -12.9% 81,125 0.0%
MISCELLANEOUS 11,843 135,000 8.8% 135,000 0.0%
TRANSFERS IN - 185,000 0.0%185,000 0.0%
TOTAL REVENUES 7,174,381 32,275,999 22.2% 32,401,803 0.4%
% Actuals YE % Variance
to Budget to Budget
EXPENDITURES:
COUNCIL 83,618 207,022 40.4% 207,022 0.0%
CLERK 84,778 497,102 17.1% 497,102 0.0%
MANAGER 151,620 721,724 21.0% 721,724 0.0%
HUMAN RESOURCES 77,287 371,998 20.8% 371,998 0.0%
FINANCE 155,149 748,060 20.7% 747,617 -0.1%
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 335,433 1,432,374 23.4% 1,432,374 0.0%
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION 364,189 1,867,600 19.5% 1,867,600 0.0%
LEGAL 142,481 756,855 18.8% 756,855 0.0%
COURT 169,293 789,826 21.4% 789,826 0.0%
DEV & INFRASTRUCTURE SVCS 897,233 4,564,803 19.7% 4,418,249 -3.2%
PARKS & RECREATION 589,147 2,722,617 21.6% 2,722,617 0.0%
POLICE 3,258,882 14,885,819 21.9% 14,885,819 0.0%
TRANSFERS OUT 158,965 2,890,965 5.5%2,890,965 0.0%
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 6,468,075 32,456,765 19.9% 32,309,768 -0.5%
SURPLUS / (DEFICIT) 706,306 (180,766) 92,035
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE **11,534,023
Plus: Surplus / (Deficit)92,035
ENDING FUND BALANCE **11,626,057
* Year-end estimates are subject to further revision
** Beginning and ending fund balance amounts are estimates and are subject to further revision
FY 2014/2015
Year End
Estimate *
Budget Year End
Estimate *
Actuals
thru 9/2014
Actuals
thru 9/2014
Budget
F:\BUDGET ANALYST\Financial Reports 2014-2015\1Q\Sep\Sep FY15 Monthly Report 11/06/2014
ATTACHMENT B
September YTD Financial Status FY 2014/2015
% Budget Completion through September --- 25%
Actuals
thru 9/2014 Budget % Actuals
to Budget
Year End
Estimate *
YE % Variance
to Budget
REVENUES:
LICENSES & PERMITS 13,715 52,000 26.4% 52,000 0.0%
STATE/COUNTY SHARED 695,600 2,754,947 25.2% 2,754,947 0.0%
CHARGES FOR SERVICES 32,373 129,493 25.0% 129,493 0.0%
INTEREST INCOME (1,973) 19,250 -10.3% 19,250 0.0%
MISCELLANEOUS 2,028 10,000 20.3%10,000 0.0%
TOTAL REVENUES 741,742 2,965,690 25.0% 2,965,690 0.0%
Actuals
thru 9/2014 Budget % Actuals
to Budget
Year End
Estimate *
YE % Variance
to Budget
EXPENDITURES:
ADMINISTRATION 109,506 610,478 17.9% 610,478 0.0%
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING 114,158 537,275 21.2% 537,275 0.0%
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT 25,171 1,219,002 2.1% 1,219,002 0.0%
STREET MAINTENANCE 303,157 1,053,631 28.8% 1,053,631 0.0%
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 102,308 934,276 11.0%934,276 0.0%
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 654,300 4,354,662 15.0% 4,354,662 0.0%
SURPLUS / (DEFICIT) 87,442 (1,388,972) (1,388,972)
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE **4,175,161
Plus: Surplus / (Deficit) (1,388,972)
ENDING FUND BALANCE **2,786,189
* Year-end estimates are subject to further revision
** Beginning and ending fund balance amounts are estimates and are subject to further revision
Highway Fund
F:\BUDGET ANALYST\Financial Reports 2014-2015\1Q\Sep\Sep FY15 Monthly Report 11/06/2014
ATTACHMENT C
September YTD Financial Status
% Budget Completion through September --- 25%
% Actuals YE % Variance
to Budget to Budget
REVENUES:
BED TAXES 192,251 944,571 20.4% 944,571 0.0%
INTEREST INCOME (491) 4,125 -11.9%4,125 0.0%
TOTAL REVENUES 191,760 948,696 20.2% 948,696 0.0%
% Actuals YE % Variance
to Budget to Budget
EXPENDITURES:
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 79,715 608,457 13.1% 608,457 0.0%
TRANSFERS OUT 167,543 352,543 47.5%352,543 0.0%
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 247,258 961,000 25.7% 961,000 0.0%
SURPLUS / (DEFICIT) (55,498) (12,304) (12,304)
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE **425,099
Plus: Surplus / (Deficit) (12,304)
ENDING FUND BALANCE **412,795
* Year-end estimates are subject to further revision
** Beginning and ending fund balance amounts are estimates and are subject to further revision
FY 2014/2015
Year End
Estimate *
Budget Year End
Estimate *
Bed Tax Fund
Budget Actuals
thru 9/2014
Actuals
thru 9/2014
F:\BUDGET ANALYST\Financial Reports 2014-2015\1Q\Sep\Sep FY15 Monthly Report 11/06/2014
ATTACHMENT D
Co
n
s
o
l
i
d
a
t
e
d
Y
e
a
r
-
t
o
-
D
a
t
e
F
i
n
a
n
c
ia
l
R
e
p
o
r
t
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
,
2
0
1
4
FY 2014/2015
FY
1
4
/
1
5
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
L
e
a
s
e
s
/
Left in Accounts
Be
g
i
n
B
a
l
.
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
O
u
t
Thru Sep 2014
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
-
U
n
a
s
s
i
g
n
e
d
9
,
9
2
5
,
9
8
8
7
,
1
7
4
,
3
8
1
-
7
,
1
7
4
,
3
8
1
1
6
0
,
5
2
6
4
,
7
7
1
,
0
9
2
1
,
4
8
4
,
5
2
3
5
1
,
9
3
4
- - 6,468,075 10,632,294
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
-
A
s
s
i
g
n
e
d
1
,
6
0
8
,
0
3
5
1,608,035
Hi
g
h
w
a
y
F
u
n
d
-
R
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
e
d
4
,
1
7
5
,
1
6
1
7
4
1
,
7
4
2
-
7
4
1
,
7
4
2
-
4
0
7
,
6
1
8
1
0
1
,
1
7
1
1
4
5
,
5
1
1
- - 654,300 4,262,603
Se
i
z
u
r
e
&
F
o
r
f
e
i
t
u
r
e
-
S
t
a
t
e
5
2
6
,
9
0
1
2
,
5
8
3
-
2
,
5
8
3
-
-
2
5
,
1
7
0
1
4
,
1
0
0
- - 39,270 490,214
Se
i
z
u
r
e
&
F
o
r
f
e
i
t
u
r
e
-
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
3
4
9
,
7
2
4
1
8
4
-
1
8
4
2
3
,
4
5
8
5
,
6
1
2
5
1
- - 29,121 320,787
Be
d
T
a
x
F
u
n
d
-
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
d
4
2
5
,
0
9
9
1
9
1
,
7
6
0
-
1
9
1
,
7
6
0
1
6
7
,
5
4
3
5
4
,
1
7
7
2
5
,
5
3
8
-
- - 247,258 369,601
Im
p
o
u
n
d
F
e
e
F
u
n
d
7
,
3
4
6
8
,
5
5
0
-
8
,
5
5
0
-
6
,
1
0
5
-
-
- - 6,105 9,791
Mu
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
D
e
b
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
F
u
n
d
5
3
3
,
9
2
8
3
1
,
8
0
4
3
2
9
,
6
2
7
3
6
1
,
4
3
1
-
-
2
,
8
2
4
-
- 667,200 670,024 225,334
Or
a
c
l
e
R
o
a
d
D
e
b
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
F
u
n
d
2
8
1
-
-
-
-
-
2
5
0
-
- - 250 31
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
W
a
t
e
r
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
D
e
v
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
F
u
n
d
3
,
3
3
6
,
0
9
9
3
3
9
,
7
5
6
-
3
3
9
,
7
5
6
-
-
-
5
9
,
6
2
0
- - 59,620 3,616,235
Po
t
a
b
l
e
W
a
t
e
r
S
y
s
t
e
m
D
e
v
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
F
u
n
d
4
,
5
0
5
,
6
3
5
1
7
2
,
5
9
9
-
1
7
2
,
5
9
9
-
-
-
-
- - - 4,678,234
To
w
n
w
i
d
e
R
o
a
d
w
a
y
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
F
u
n
d
2
,
7
9
1
,
1
6
6
1
5
2
,
1
5
2
-
1
5
2
,
1
5
2
-
-
-
5
2
,
4
9
4
- - 52,494 2,890,824
Pa
r
k
s
&
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
F
u
n
d
2
1
,
5
5
5
3
7
,
7
8
5
-
3
7
,
7
8
5
-
-
-
-
- - - 59,340
Li
b
r
a
r
y
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
F
u
n
d
1
1
4
,
7
9
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- - - 114,798
Po
l
i
c
e
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
F
u
n
d
2
0
5
,
9
3
6
1
4
,
8
8
6
-
1
4
,
8
8
6
-
-
-
-
- - - 220,822
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
F
u
n
d
3
,
5
0
2
1
-
1
-
-
-
-
- - - 3,503
Na
r
a
n
j
a
P
a
r
k
F
u
n
d
7
3
7
,
0
5
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
1
2
,
1
8
9
- - 212,189 524,867
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
C
I
P
F
u
n
d
1
,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
9
,
3
0
1
- - 89,301 1,410,699
W
a
t
e
r
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
1
1
,
8
2
3
,
3
4
2
3
,
5
7
7
,
4
0
0
-
3
,
5
7
7
,
4
0
0
3
,
1
1
9
6
4
5
,
2
6
3
1
,
1
9
0
,
4
5
1
9
2
4
,
7
9
8
- 2,763,630 12,637,111
St
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
5
0
3
,
4
7
4
1
1
3
,
1
7
0
-
1
1
3
,
1
7
0
1
,
9
1
9
7
4
,
8
9
3
9
0
,
0
4
0
6
,
5
6
3
- - 173,414 443,229
Fl
e
e
t
F
u
n
d
8
4
,
9
4
9
2
0
2
,
3
3
8
-
2
0
2
,
3
3
8
-
1
7
,
8
2
1
1
1
6
,
7
9
1
2
7
,
1
7
3
- - 161,784 125,502
Be
n
e
f
i
t
S
e
l
f
I
n
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
F
u
n
d
5
8
4
,
5
0
9
5
2
6
,
6
3
2
-
5
2
6
,
6
3
2
-
-
6
0
4
,
3
4
3
-
- - 604,343 506,798
Re
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
I
n
-
L
i
e
u
F
e
e
F
u
n
d
6
,
1
9
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- - - 6,190
To
t
a
l
4
3
,
7
7
0
,
6
7
3
1
3
,
2
8
7
,
7
2
1
3
2
9
,
6
2
7
1
3
,
6
1
7
,
3
4
8
3
3
3
,
1
0
7
6
,
0
0
0
,
4
2
7
3
,
6
4
6
,
7
1
1
1
,
5
8
3
,
7
3
2
- 667,200 12,231,176 45,156,844
Fu
n
d
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
Ot
h
e
r
F
i
n
So
u
r
c
e
s
/
T
f
r
s
To
t
a
l
I
n
Debt Service
T
o
t
a
l
O
u
t
Pe
r
s
o
n
n
e
l
O
&
M
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
C
o
n
t
i
n
g
e
n
c
y
F:
\
B
U
D
G
E
T
A
N
A
L
Y
S
T
\
F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
R
e
p
o
r
t
s
2
0
1
4
-
2
0
1
5
\
1
Q
\
S
e
p
\
S
e
p
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
A
l
l
F
u
n
d
s
11/06/2014
ATTACHMENT E
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
L
o
c
a
l
S
a
l
e
s
T
a
x
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
FY 2014/201 5
CA
T
E
G
O
R
Y
J
U
L
Y
A UG
S
E
P
O
C
T
N
O
V
D
E
C
J
A
N
F
E
B
M
A
R
A PR
M
A
Y
J
U
N
E
T
O
T
A
L
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
S
a
l
e
s
T
a
x
35
3
,
2
5
7
3
6
5
,
8
7
7
3
4
3
,
0
7
1
1,062,205
Ut
i
l
i
t
y S
a
l
e
s
T
a
x
26
9
,
7
7
2
2
9
9
,
1
5
4
2
9
2
,
4
5
6
861,382
Al
l
O
t
h
e
r
L
o
c
a
l
S
a
l
e
s
T
a
x
*
62
4
,
0
2
0
4
1
5
,
6
6
5
3
8
4
,
8
2
2
1,424,507
TO
T
A
L
1
,
2
4
7
,
0
4
9
$
1
,
0
8
0
,
6
9
6
$
1
,
0
2
0
,
3
4
9
$
3,348,094 $
*
N
o
t
e
:
D
o
e
s
n
o
t
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
c
a
b
l
e
f
r
a
n
c
hi
s
e
f
e
e
s
o
r
s
a
l
e
s
t
a
x
a
u
d
i
t
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
F:
\
B
U
D
G
E
T
A
N
A
L
Y
S
T
\
F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
R
e
p
o
r
t
s
2
0
1
4
-
2
0
1
5
\
1
Q
\
S
e
p
\
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
E
-
G
F
L
o
c
a
l
S
a
l
e
s
T
a
x
11/06/2014
Town Council Regular Session Item # C.
Meeting Date:11/19/2014
Requested by: Amanda Jacobs Submitted By:Amanda Jacobs, Town Manager's Office
Department:Town Manager's Office
Information
SUBJECT:
Greater Oro Valley Chamber of Commerce Quarterly Report: July 1, 2014 - September 30, 2014
RECOMMENDATION:
This report is for information only.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The 2014/15 Financial Participation Agreement (FPA) between the Town of Oro Valley and the Greater
Oro Valley Chamber of Commerce (Chamber) stipulates that a quarterly report be compiled by the
Chamber and submitted to the Economic Development Division and Council. The enclosed report
satisfies the FPA requirement for the first quarter of FY 2014/15.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
The FY 2014/15 FPA between the Town of Oro Valley and the Greater Oro Valley Chamber of
Commerce is $30,000.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
N/A
Attachments
Chamber FPA
Chamber First Quarter Report
RESOLUTION NO. (R)14-33
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN
OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING A
FINANCIAL PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY AND THE GREATER ORO VALLEY
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
WHEREAS, pursuant to A.R.S. § 9-500 .11 , th e Town ma y appropria te publi c mon ies for and in
con nec ti o n w ith econom ic dev e lo pm ent activ iti es as lo ng as there is adequate cons id e rati on; and
WHEREAS, the T own des ir es to co ntinu e to promote a bu s ine ss env ironment in Oro Valley
that enhan ces eco no mic vi ta lity and im proves th e qua lity of life fo r it s residents; and
WHEREAS, the Town o f Oro Valley des ir es to enter into a F inan c ia l Parti c ipati o n
Agreement w ith the Great er Oro Va ll ey C ham ber o f Co mmerce; and
WHEREAS, it is in the best in terest of the Town to enter int o the F in anc ial Parti c ipati o n
Agreement with the Greate r Oro Val ley Cha mber of Commerce, attached hereto as Exhibit
"A " and in corporated herein by thi s refere nce, to se t forth the term s and condit io ns o f the
Agreement.
NOW , THEREFORE, BE IT R ESOLVE D by the Mayor and Council of the Town of
Oro Va lley, Ar izona , that:
SECTION 1. The Financial Pal1i c ipati on Agreement between the Town of Oro
Valley and the Greater Oro Va ll ey C hamb er o f Commerce, attac hed here to a s Ex hibit
"A" and incorp orated herein by thi s re ference, is hereby aut hor ized a nd approved.
SECTION 2. The Mayor and oth er administrative officials are hereby a uthori ze d to
tak e s uch steps as nece ssa ry to execute and impl emen t the te rm s of th e Ag reement.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Co uncil of the Town of Or o Valle y, Arizona,
thi s 4th day o f June , 2014.
TOWN OF ORO V ALLEY
Dr. Sa ti sh I. Hir ema h, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
~~ Tobin Idle s, L ega l Services Director
Date: -------'-'&,----/-1----"'&,-+1--,--1 tf-'--------_ / 7 Date: ------"6'----'--f~5!+-1 LfL----_
2
EXHIBIT" A"
3
Town of Oro Va lley
lFINANClIAL PARTICJ[PATION AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is mad e a nd e ntered int o thi s \ 0 da y o f ju.(lV 20 14 ,
by and b e twee n th e T ow n of Oro Va ll ey, a municipa l co rporati o n , h erei nafte r c all e d th e "T own"
and th e G reater O ro V alley C hamb er of Commerce , a n o n -p ro fit corpo rati o n, he re in a ft e r
c all ed t he "Agency".
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, it h as been det e rmined that the actIVItIes o f A ge ncy are in the publi c
i nterest, a nd a r e s uch as to improve a nd prom ote th e public welfare of t he Town; and
WHEREAS, th e Mayo r an d Co un c i l ha ve d e termin e d that t o fin anc iall y part ici pate in
the pro m o ti o n of th e acti v it ies o f Agency is a publi c purpose in th at th e ac ti v iti e s co n fe r direct
benefit of a ge neral chara cter to a signi fi c ant part of th e public .
N OW THEREFORE, in co n s iderati o n o f th e mutual covena nt s and cond it io n s
hereinafte r se t f o rth , th e parti es he reto d o mutuall y ag ree as fo ll ows:
Section 1: S tatement of Pu rpo se
Agenc y wi ll pr ov ide tour is m a nd v is itor 's services a nd infonnati o n to T o wn re sid e nts an d
seaso nal touri sts and any o ne indi catin g an interest in locating a bu s in ess o r re siden ce in th e
Town .
Section 2: Services to be Performed bv Agency
A gency p erfo rman ce meas w'es fo r Fiscal Year 201 41J 5 are a s fo ll ows:
1. Bu sine ss Recruitm e nt, R e te nti on and Ouireach
a. The Chamber w ill co ntinue to parti c ipat e in the T own's Bu s ine ss Rete nti o n an d
Expan s ion (B R&E) Progr am.
b . T h e C h amber e nhan ced t he T own 's ex is ting Sh o p Oro Va ll ey c ampai g n by
c reat in g a Sho p Oro Va ll ey Coup o n B oo k in FY201 21J3. T he Sh op Oro Val ley
Coup o n w ill be created annuall y b y th e C ha mbe r. Th e final draft of the S ho p O ro
Valle y Co up o n B oo k will be coo rdin ated between th e C hamber Presid e n t/CEO
a nd the Eco no mi c D eve lopment Mana ge r.
c. T o expand up o n the S hop Oro Va ll ey ca mpaign and th e OV D o llars progra m , the
C hamber w ill coo rdin a te at le as t tw o "S h o p Oro Va ll ey" s pec ia l event s w ith Oro
Va lle y bus ine sses.
d. The C h a mb e r w ill serve as a seco nd di stribut io n poi n t fo r OV Dollars a nd w ill
pro v id e minimum total sa le s o f $1 0,000 during th e peri o d o f thi s contract.
e. T he Chamb e r s ha ll wo rk to a ss is t th e Town in e mph as izing the imp o rtanc e o f
suppo rtin g loca l re tail e rs/bu s ine sses through educational and prom oti o nal effOi t s
and wi ll di s pl ay th e f o llowing m ateria ls at the C h a mbe r o ffice s: Oro Va ll ey
Bus ine ss Nav igato r, S h op Oro Va ll ey C ampaign an d OV D olla rs and othe r
Town of Oro VaHey
FINANCIAL PARTJ:CIIPATION AGREEMENT
economic development related materials as deemed appropriate by the Chamber
President/CEO and Economic Development Manager.
2. Special Events
a. The Chambe r will coordinate ribbon cuttings for new Oro Valley businesses.
b. The Chamber will host four Oro Valley educational forums that will be open to
members and non-members .
c. The Chamber will co ll ect marketing material from Oro Valley area businesses
that will be given to attendees and athletes, during special events. The material
will be provided to the Economic Development D ivision one week prior to the
day of the event.
d. The Chamber will provide $]0 in OV Dollars to 500 athletes of the 20]5 Arizona
Distance Classic. The total cost will be split between the T own of Oro Valley,
M3S Sports and Visit Tucson .
e. During thi s Agreement, Town officials will attend Chamber breakfasts, luncheon s
and mixers free of charge as long as each official pre-registers for each event.
f. The Town w ill receive one complimentary table of 10 for the Annual Chamber
meeting.
g. The Town will receive eight complimentary tables of 10 to the State of the Town
of Oro Valley Address and Luncheon.
h . Annual Chamber membership dues to be paid by the Town shall be included as
part of the monetary consideration of this Agreement.
I. During the tenn of this Agreement, the Agency will refrain fr om endorsing any
candidate for Mayor or Council mcmber of the Town of Oro Valley.
Section 3: S ervices to be Provided by the Town
All funding is subject to the Town's budget appropriation s . For this Agreement, up to Thirty
Thousand Dollars ($30 ,000) shall be allocated to Agency.
Section 4: Responsibility for Open Records
Agency agrees to open to the public all records relating to an y funds directly received from the
Town that Agency distributes to any organization and/or individual.
Section 5: Evaluation C riteria and Reporting
In order to assess the impact of Agency, the Town reserves the right to evaluate performance,
and to hav e access to ;ill pertinent info rmati o n nece ssa ry to make evaluations.
A . Agency agrees to submit to the Town, through the Economic Developmen t Divi s ion ,
quarterly reports addressing the progress of Agency in achieving its Program of Work.
Reports shall be sub mitted within thirty (30) working day s of the end of each calendar
quarter.
B . Agency agrees to give explanation s for any variance in th e expected perfo rmance for
each measure.
2
Town OfOTO Vaney
FiNANCIAL PARHCIPATION AGREEMENT
C. A ge n cy agrees to g ive projected performance fo r each meas ur e through the end o f the
fi sca l year (June 30th).
D. Agency agrees to review and present s uch rep o lts to the T own Co un c il in o pen m ee ting s
o n a n "as reques ted" bas is.
Section 6: Accountabi lity
Agency s hall maintain a true and accurate acc o unting system which meets generally accepted
accounting principles , and which is capable of p rope rl y accounting for a ll expend itu re s and
receipts of Agency on a tim e ly bas is . In additi o n , Agency s hall maintain ev idence o f it s
compliance with t he n o ndi sc riminatio n pro vis io n s of thi s Agreement.
Agency 's acco unting system s ha ll permit separate , id entifiable accounting for all fund s provided
by the Town pursuant to thi s Agreement.
Agency shall prov ide the Financ e D epa ltm en t o f th e Town, w ithin four (4) months after the clos e
of Agen cy's fi scal year, a co py o f the finan cia l au dit o f Agency's o perat ion s by an in dependent
ceJtifi ed public acco un tant, al o n g with any management letter and , if appl icab le, Agen cy's plan
for correctiv e a c ti on.
If Agency d oes not have an audit, it s h all submit within three (3) m o nth s after the c lose of it s
fiscal yea r, a co mplete accounting of T own fund s received . Thi s accounting must be approved
b y th e Finance Department of th e T own as suffi c icntl y de s criptive and complete.
If for good reaso n Agency cannot meet the times es tabl ished fo r s ubmi ss io n of finan c ial
reportin g, Agency s h all no tify th e Finance Department in writ in g t he reason for the delay,
prov id e an expected completi o n date and reque st a waiver of the due date.
At a n y tim e during or after th e peri o d of thi s Agreement, the Town Finance Department and /or a
Town agent may audit Age n cy's overall finan c ial operation or co mpliance with the
nondi scriminati o n clause of t hi s Ag r eeme nt [or the Agreement peri od . Agency shall prov ide any
financia l repo rt s, no nd iscriminati o n p o li cies and procedures or ot he r documentati o n necessar y to
accompli s h s uch audits.
Section 7 : Matching Grants
Agen cy a g ree s to obtain Ma yo r and Counc il approv al prior to appl yi n g for any matching grants
invo lv in g the comm itm e nt of T own fund s .
Section 8: No ndiscrimination
Agency , in its employmen t policie s and pra cti ce s, in it s publi c accom modation s and in it s
prov is ion o f serv ices s hall o be y al l releva nt and applicab le, federal, state, and loca l law s,
regu lati o ns a nd standard s r e latin g to di s criminati o ns, bia ses, and /o r lim it ati on s, in c ludin g , but
no t limited to, Titles V I an d V II o f the C iv i l Ri g ht s Ac t of 1964, the Age Di sc rimin at io n in
3
Towill of Oro Valiey
FINANCIAL PAR'HCIPAnON AGREEMENT
E mpl oyment Act of 1967 , the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 , the A rizona Civil Rights
Act, the Ar izonans with Disabilities Act, the Human Relations provisions of the Oro Va ll ey
Code, and the Mayo r and Council policy adopted on September 25, 2000, prohibiting the direct
o r indirect g rant of discretionary Town funds to o rgani zati ons that have a policy of exclusionary
discrimination on the basis o f race, color, religion, ancestry , sex, age, disability, national o rigin ,
sexua l orientation, gen d er identity, familial statu s or marital status. See Administrative
Guidance Re : Non-Di sc riminati on Po li cy for Programs Funded by the Town of Oro Valley,
attached and incorporated herein by this refe rence.
Section 9: Sub-rec ipien t Funding Agreements
Agenc y agrees to include in all o f its sub-recipient funding agreements the nondiscrimination
provisions contained in Secti o n 8 herein.
Section 10 : Term of Agreement
This Agreement sha ll be effective from July 1,2014 through June 30, 2015. This Agreement
may be extended at the so le optio n o f the T own for additional fiscal year(s) only under the
following co nditi ons:
A. The Mayor and Council of the Town determine the services of Agency a re in the public
interest and a ll ocat e funds therefore; and
B. Th e par1ies mutually agre e to a scope of services to be provided by Agency in any
s ub sequent fiscal year.
Any extension of this Agreeme nt shall be memorialized in writin g and s i gned by the Par1ies.
Section 11: Payment W ithholding, Reduction, or Termination
The T own may withho ld who le or part of the schedu led payment, reduce, o r terminate funding
a llo cat ion s t o Agency if:
A. Services are not rendered.
B. Agency fails to s uppl y informa tion or reports as required.
C. Agency is not in compliance w i th agreed upon disbursement documentation and /o r oth e r
proj ect p erforman ce.
D. Agency fai Is to make required payments to s ub contractors.
E. The Town has reasonable ca u se t o believe Agency i s not in co mpliance with th e
nondiscrimination clau se ofthis Agreement.
F. The Ma yor and Co un ci l fail to appropriate all or pari of the funds for this Agreement.
Such payment r eductions o r payment terminati o n may result in Agen cy receiving a lesser total
Town allocation unde r this Agreement than the maximum funding allo cated. If reasons for
w it hholding payments other non-appropriation of funds have been correcte d to the sat isfaction of
the Town, any amounts due shall be processed.
4
Town of Oro Valley
FINANCIAL PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT
T he T own w i ll be reimbursed f o r any fund s expe nded for serv ic e s n o t rendered. In add iti o n ,
Agency s h a ll return to the Town any T own fund s p rov ided purs ua nt to thi s Agreement th at have
not been ex pe nd ed by Jun e 30, 20 15.
Section 12: Termination of A greement
Thi s Agreement may be terminate d at any time by mutual written consent, o r by e ith e r party
giv in g thirty (30) days w ritten no tice to the o th e r party o r at such time , as in t he opinion of the
Town , Agency's perfonnan ce here und e r is deemed un sati sfactory.
Section 13: Method of Pavment
Th e parties hav e agreed that Agency w ill receive up to $30,000. Di sbursement of fund s by the
Town is s ubject to th e a nnu a l app rop riati o n b y th e T own Cou n c il and th e limi tatio ns o f the s tate
budget la w. Pay m ent s s hall be mad e on a qua r te rl y basis comm encing Jul y 1,20 14 . Payments
a re to be made wi thi n fort y (4 0) da ys a ft e r the clo se o f each preced in g quarte r.
S ection 14: Indemnification
Agency agrees to indemnify, defend and save harm less the T o wn , it s Mayo r and Cou n ci l,
appo inted board s , committ ees, and co mmi ss io ns, officers, employees , a nd in s urance carriers,
i ndividually and collect ive ly, from a ll losses, claims, suits, demand s, expen ses, s ubrogati o ns,
an o rn ey's fee s, o r actions of a n y kind a nd nature re sulting from personal injury to any perso n ,
inc ludi n g e mpl oyees of Agency or o f any s ubco ntracto r em pl oyed b y Agency (includin g bodily
injury and death ); cla im s base d up o n di sc rimination an d /o r v iolatio n o f civi l ri g ht s; o r damages
to a ny property, aris ing or a ll eged t o ha ve ari sen out of the work to be p e rfo rmed here un de r,
excep t a n y s u ch injury o r dama ges ar is in g o ut of th e so le negligence of th e Town, it s officers,
agent s, or e mpl o yees. W o rke r s' Co mp e ns ati o n in surance and/or se lf -insu ra n ce carri e d by the
T own d o n ot apply to e mpl oyees o r vo lunteers ac ting in any capacity f or Age n cy.
Section 15: Independent Contractor
The partie s s tipulate and agree that A gency is n o t a n emp loyee of the T own and is perform in g its
duti es he reu nd er as an Indepe nd e nt Contracto r , s upp ly in g its own emp loyees and maintaining its
o wn in surance, workers ' compensati o n in s urance and h andling all of it s own inte rn al accounti ng.
The T o w n in no way contro ls, di rec ts o r ha s any r es p o nsibility f o r the action s of Agency .
Sec tion 16: Insurance
Agen cy agrees to:
A . Obtain in s uran ce covera ge o f th e t ypes a nd amo u n ts requi red in thi s Sec ti o n a nd keep s uc h
in s ur a n ce coverage in force thro ug hout th e life o f thi s Agreement. Al l po li cies wi ll contain
5
Town of Oro Valley
FINANCIAL PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT
an endorsement providing that written notice be given to th e Town at least thirty (30)
calendar days prior to termination, cancel lati on, or reduction in coverage in any policy.
B. The Compre h ensive General Liability Insurance policy will in cl ud e the Town
as an additional in sured w ith respect to liability arising out of the performance of this
Agree m ent.
C. Agency wi ll provide and maintain minimum insurance limits as follows:
COVERAGE AFFORDED
I. Workers' Compensation
2. E mplo yer's Liability
3. Comprehensive General
Liability In s uranc e --
In c ludin g:
(I) Products and Completed Operations
(2) Blanket Contractual
LIMITS OF LIABILITY
Statute
$100,000
$1,000,000 -Bodily Injury and
Combined Si ng le Limit
$100 ,000 Property Damage
D. Agency shall adequately insure it sel f against clai m s based upon unlawful discrimination
and violatio n of c i vi l ri g ht s. Th e cost of this insurance s hall be borne by Agency.
Section 17. Use of the Town Logo
The Town Logo shall be used for the recognition of th e Town's contribution to Agency only.
Section 18 : Conflict oflnterest
Th is Agreement is s ubject to the conflict of interest provisions of A.R.S. § 38-5 1 I , et seq .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed thi s Agreement as of the date first
above written.
6
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, a municipal
corporation
Town of Oro Valley
FINANCIAL PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT
ATTEST:
. Bower , as Town Clerk
and not personally
Date: to l iP /ILl 7 7
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
~a
Tobin Sidles, as Legal Se rvices Director
and not personall y
Date:_JUG'-f-!-.L?,I-+!;--iI1 __ _
GREATER ORO VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE., a non-pro fit Co rp oration
Agency Repre s entative
and no t perso nall y
Title T'1l"~.bJea 1--/ c. ~o
State of Ar izona )
) ss.
Co unty of ) Iii
On this Iv day of ~{~ ,20 14 ,D(J.(lIIl · ~,knownt o m e(o
be th e per so n whose name is s ub scr ibed (0 the with in in strum ent, perso nally appeared before m e
and acknowled ged tha t he/she executej the sa me fo r the purposes co ntained.
Given under m y hand and sea l on ~Vvu..-,. l'O ,20 14.
My Co mmi ss ion Expires: '?J /:>1£ / :;2.0 I 'f
•
7
• OFFICIAL SEAL · "
Teresa Bracamontf' $;
.; NotarY Public -Ari zon a >
Pima County >~.
M Commission Ex Ir., 3/26 2016 ~. ,,,_~~~~ ....... o.o,.;'
1
QUARTERLY PROGRESS REPORT
July 1, 2014 – September 30, 2014
Submitted To: Amanda Jacobs, Economic Development Manager
By: Dave Perry, President/CEO
In accordance with Resolution No. (R) 14-33
A.Tourism, Visitors Services and General Information
The Greater Oro Valley Chamber of Commerce has provided tourism and visitor’s services and
information to Town residents and seasonal tourists and anyone indicating an interest in locating a
business or residence in the Town over the past three months. Below is data on activity that the
Chamber has addressed through this quarter:
Category July 2014 Aug 2014 Sept 2014 Total
1. Business Retention Site Visits 1 1 2 4
2. OV Dollars Distribution $50 0 $50 $100
3. Ribbon Cuttings 2 0 1 3
4. Breakfasts, lunches, mixers 4 10 80 94
5. Relocation Packages 14 48 4 66
1. The Chamber President and/or staff attended Business Retention Site Visits with the
following businesses: Desert Springs Gracious Retirement Living, Mutual of Omaha
Bank, Villas at San Dorado and Panera Bread.
2. OV Dollars: The Chamber is responsible for activating and distributing $10,000 in OV
Dollars cards this fiscal year. This quarter the Chamber activated 4 cards totaling $100.
3. Ribbon cuttings/ground breakings were held for Dickey’s Barbecue on July 14, HSL
Properties’ Encantada at Steam Pump apartment project on July 19, and the Villas at
San Dorado on Sept. 5.The Chamber also helped Red Lion Inn & Suites celebrate its
new branding at an August event.
4. 94 Town officials took advantage of the free Chamber breakfasts, luncheons and mixers.
5. 66 relocation packages were distributed in the first quarter.
Additional Information
The Chamber hosted the Oro Valley State of the Town luncheon on Friday, Sept. 12.We had 580
guests.The Town of Oro Valley purchased 80 tickets to that event, at a cost of $4,400.
The Chamber also hosted its Annual Meeting / Awards breakfast on Friday, Aug. 8.The Town of
Oro Valley purchased 10 tickets to that event at a cost of $300.
We also made courtesy calls with town staff in early July to talk about sign rules in the newly
annexed area west of Oracle and north of Ina;had a July 29 meeting with town staff to strategize
about Oro Valley Dollars; worked with planning staff on the October economic development forum
that was part of Your Voice Our Future; met with town staff and Visit Tucson to partner together to
develop a kids free month campaign in Oro Valley.
Town Council Regular Session Item # D.
Meeting Date:11/19/2014
Requested by: Amanda Jacobs Submitted By:Amanda Jacobs, Town Manager's Office
Department:Town Manager's Office
Information
SUBJECT:
Visit Tucson Quarterly Report: July 1, 2014 - September 30, 2014
RECOMMENDATION:
This report is for information only.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The FY 2014/15 Financial Participation Agreement (FPA) between the Town of Oro Valley and Visit
Tucson (formerly known as the Metropolitan Tucson Convention and Visitors Bureau) stipulates that a
quarterly report be compiled by Visit Tucson and submitted to the Economic Development Division and
Town Council. The enclosed report satisfies the FPA requirement for the first quarter of FY 2014/15.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
The FY 2014/15 FPA between the Town of Oro Valley and Visit Tucson is $175,000.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
N/A
Attachments
MTCVB FPA
Visit Tucson First Quarter Report
RESOLUTION NO. (R)12-37
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN
OF ORO V ALLEY, ARlZONA, AUTHORlZING AND APPROVING A
FINANCIAL PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
TOWN OF ORO V ALLEY AND THE METROPOLITAN TUCSON
CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU
WHEREAS, the Town of Oro Valley is a political subdivi sion of the State of Arizona vested
with all associated rights, plivileges and benefits and is entitled to the immunities and
exemptions granted municipalities and political subdivisions under the Constitution and laws of
the State of Arizona and the United States; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to A.R.S. § 9-500.11 , th e Town may appropriate public monies for and in
connection with economic development activities as long as there is adequate consid eration; and
WHEREAS, the Town desire s to continue to promote a busines s environment in Oro Valley
that enhances economic vitality and improves the quality oflife for its re s idents; and
WHEREAS, th e Town of Oro Valley desires to enter into a Financial Participation
Agreement Witll the Metropolitan Tucson Convention and Visitors Bureau (MTCVB); and
WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the Town to en ter into the Financial Participation
Agreement with the MTCVB, attached h ereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this
reference, to set forth the terms and conditions of the Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of
Oro Valley, Arizona, that:
SECTION 1. The F in ancial Participation Agreement between the Town of Oro
Valley and tlle Metropolitan Tucson Convention and Visitors Bureau, attached hereto
as Exhibit "A", is hereby authorized and approved.
SECTION 2. The Mayor and other administrative officials are hereby authori ze d to
take such steps as necessary to execute and implement the terms of the Agreement.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Counci l of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizo na
this 20th day of June, 2012.
TOWN OF ORO V ALLEY
Jj, &~/.~
Dr. Satish 1. Hiremath, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM :
Tobin Ro sen , Town Attomey
Date: ~h? ~// 2 Date: _...::6--l.1...::Z1l--"-.L1 ,-,I v'----____ _
1\l£X1CQtfJ>.ckClPnntcrIAGENDA ITOJ .. ",O(U _ AU1 _ RQo 1 ).)1 dol; 2
EXHIBIT "A"
I \PaMm\\fTCV8\fVlOI1·ll\.\rrCVB ResoIu.ion fo. 2012·2011 FlNALdoI: 3
Town of Oro Valley
FINANCIAL PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this r 5+ day of .:Tv I V , 2012 ,
by and between the Town of Oro Valley, a municipal co rporation , hereinafter [ailed the "Town"
and the Metropolitan Tucson Convention and Visitors Bureau, a non-profit corporation ,
hereinafter called the" Agency".
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the activities of Agency are in the public
interest , and are such as to impro ve and promote the public welfare ofthe Town; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council have determined that to financially participate in
the promotion of the activities of Agency is a public purpose in that the activities confer direct
benefit of a general character to a s ignificant part of the public.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions
hereinafter set forth, th e partie s hereto do mutually agree as follows:
Section 1. Definitions
A. Tour Operator -a perso n who arranges and/or organizes groups of people to
travel together to a destination and who also organizes tour packages and
advertises them for people to buy.
B. Travel Agent Impressions -the number of travel agents who would likely read a
tour brochure which a tour operator produced to promote tours that he or she
organized.
Section 2. Statement of Purpose
Agency will initiate, implement and administer a comprehensive sales promotion and advertising
program to attract an increasin g number of convention delegates and vacationing tourists to the
Town, thereby providing revenues to the community through transient rental and sales taxes , and
contributing to the overall economic growth and contin ued viability of the tourism and
hospitality indu stry.
Section 3. Services to be Performed by Agency
Agency performance mea sure s outlined below are for FY 20 12-13 (July 1,2012 -June 30 ,
2013). The performance measures for FY 2013-14 (July 1, 2013 -June 30 , 2014) will be
determined at the end ofFY 2012-13. The performance measures for FY 2014-15 (Jul y 1,20 14
-June 30, 20 \5) will be determined at the end ofFY 2013-2014.
Town of Oro Valley
FINANCIAL PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT
Convention Sales
1. Generate 275 convention sales leads for Oro Valley properties.
2. Conduct 35 customer interaction/site inspections for Oro Valley properties.
3. Confirm.ll convention bookings for future dates for Oro Valley properties.
4. Confirm convention bookings for future dates resulting in 6,000 room nights for Oro
Valley properties.
Convention Services
I. Service a minimwn of25 Oro Valley meetings and conventions.
Travel Industrv Sales
1. Generate 35 domestic and international tour program leads and services for Oro Valley
properties/venues.
2 . Promote Oro Valley as one of the world 's top leisure destinations to 500 targeted tour
operator clients.
3. Generate a minimum of 600,000 tour operators and travel agent impressions via
destination product offering in domestic and international tour operator catalogues.
Communications
1. Feature Oro Valley within the first 10 pages of the Official MTCVB Visit Guide
2. Reach a minimum of750,000 readers/viewers through editorial placement.
3. Generate publicity w ith an equivalent advertising valu e of at least $20,000.00.
Marketing
I. Feature Oro Valley 's Aquatic Fac ili ty in the on line edition of the Sports Facility Guide
2 . Generate no less than a total of 75,000 inquiries from high demographic customers in
primary markets i .e. (Chicago , Los Angeles, New York) secondary markets (including
Denver, San Diego , San Francisco) and Canada .
3. Generate a minimum of 1,250,000 unique visitors to the MTCVB website
(wwvv. vi s i IT lIcson.org).
4. Generate 10,000 unique visitors to the Town of Oro Valley's and Oro Valley properties
website (www.orovall eyaz.go v) from the MTCVB website (www.visitTucson.org).
5. Town officials may attend trade shows with MTCVB staff at the expense of the Town .
General Support
1. Consult with Town staff and officials on tourism sales and marketing initiatives,
including , but not limited to , promoting Town venues to special event operators, Mexico
marketing, leisure marketing and group sales initiatives.
2 . One Town official will serve on the MTCVB Board of Directors.
Town of Oro Valley
FINANCIAL PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT
Section 4. Services to be Provided by the Town
All funding is subject to the Town 's budget appropriations . For this Agreement, up to Seventy
Four Thousand Nine Hundred Seventy Dollars ($74,970) shall be allocated to Agency.
Section 5. Responsibility for Open Records
Agency agrees to open to the public a ll records relating to any funds directly received from the
Town that Agency distributes to any organization and /or individual.
Section 6. Evaluation Criteria and Reporting
A. Agency agrees to submit to the Town , through the Economic Development Division,
quarterly reports addressi ng the progress of the Agency in achieving its performance
measures li sted in Section 2. Reports shall be submitted to the Economic Development
Manager within thirty (30) working days of the end of the calendar quarter.
B. Agency agrees to review and present such quarterly reports to the Town Council in open
meetings on an "as requested" basis.
Section 7. Accountability
Agency shall maintain a true and accurate accounting system which meets generally accepted
accounting principles, and which is capable of properly accounting for all expenditures and
receipts of Agency on a timely basis. In addition, Agency shall maintain evidence of its
comp lian ce with the nondiscrimination provisions of this Agreement.
Agency shall provide the Finan ce Department of the Town , 15 days after MTCVB Board
approval , a copy of the financial audit of Agency 's operations by an independent certified public
accountant, along with any management letter and, if applicable, Agency's plan for corrective
action.
At any time during or after tlle period of this Agreement, the Town Finance Department and/or a
Town agent may audit Agency's overall financial operation or compliance with the
nondiscrimination clause of this Agreement for the Agreement period. Agency shall provide any
financial reports, nondiscrimination policies and procedures or other documentation necessary to
accomplish such audits.
Section 8. Matching Grants
Agency agrees to obtain Mayor and Council approval prior to applying for any matching grants
involving the commitment of Town funds .
Town of Oro Valley
FINANCIAL PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT
Section 9. Nondiscrimination
Agency, in its employment policies and practices, in its public accommodations and in its
provision of services shall obey all relevant and applicable, federal , state , and local laws ,
regulations and standards relating to discriminations , biases, and/or limitations, including, but
not limited to , Titles VI and VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Age Discrimination in
Employment Act of 1967, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the Arizona Civil Rights
Act , the Arizonans with Disabilities Act, the Human Relations provisions of the Oro Valley
Code, and the Mayor and Council policy adopted on September 25, 2000, prohibiting the direct
or indirect grant of discretionary Town funds to organizations that have a policy of exclusionary
discrimination on the basis of race , color, religion, ancestry, sex, age , disability, national origin,
sexual orientation, gender identity , familial status or marital status. See Administrative
Guidance Re: Non-Discrimination Policy for Programs Funded by the Town of Oro Valley,
attached and incorporated herein by this reference.
Section 10. Sub-recipient Funding Agreements
Agency agrees to include in all of its sub-recipient funding agreements the nondiscrimination
provisions contained in Section 8 herein.
Section 11. Term of Agreement
This Agreement between parties as described above shall be effective from July 1, 2012 through
June 30 , 2015 .
A. The Mayor and Council of the Town determine the services of Agency are in the public
interest and allocate funds therefore; and
B. The parties mutually agree to a scope of serv ices to be provided by Agency in any
subsequent fiscal year.
At the end of the third fiscal year referred to above, the provisions of this agreement will be
subject to review and renegotiations by the Town and the Bureau.
Section 12. Payment Withholding, Reduction, or Termination
The Town may withhold whole or part of the scheduled payment, reduce , or terminate funding
allocations to Agency if:
A. Services are not rendered.
B. Agency fails to supply information or reports as required.
C. Agency is not in compliance with agreed upon disbursement documentation and/or other
project performance.
D. Agency fails to make required payments to subcontractors.
E. The Town has reasonable cause to believe Agency is not In compliance with the
nondiscrimination clause ofthis Agreement.
Town of Oro Valley
FINANCIAL PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT
F. The Mayor and Council fail to appropriate all or part of the funds for thi s Agreement.
Such payment reductions or payment termination may result in Agency receiving a lesser total
Town allocation under this Agreement than the maximum funding allocated. If reason s for
withholding payments other than non-appropriation of funds have been corrected to the
satisfaction of the Town, any amounts due shall be processed.
The Town will be reimbursed for any funds expended for services not rendered. In addition,
Agency shall return to the Town any Town funds provided pursuant to this Agreement that have
not been expended by June 30 , 2015.
Section 13. Termination of Agreement
This Agreement may be terminated at any time by mutual written consent, or by either party
giving thirty (30) days written notice to the other party or at such time, as in the opinion of the
Town , Agency's performance hereunder is deemed unsatisfactory.
Section 14. Method of Payment
A. The parties have agreed that Agency will receive from the Town an amount not to exceed
$74,970 for FY2012-13. The Agency will receive an amount not to exceed $120,000 for
FY2013-14 and an amount not to exceed $175 ,000 for FY2014-15. Disbursement of
funds by the Town is subject to the annual appropriation by the Town Council and the
limitations of the state budget law . Payments shall be made on a quarterly basis
commencing July 1,2012. Payments are to be made within forty (40) days after the close
of each preceding quarter.
B . It shall be the responsibility of the Agency to obtain funding from sources other than the
Town. Financial participation agreements with other governments and government
agencies, grants, donations , memberships and any other sources of funding as may
become available from time to time shall be included as part of the annual budget
submission.
Section 15. Indemnification
Agency agrees to indemnify , defend and save harmless the Town, its Mayor and Council,
appointed boards, committees, and commissions , officers , employees, and insurance carriers,
individually and collectively , from all losses, claims, suits, demands, expenses, subrogations,
attorney's fees, or actions of any kind and nature resulting from personal injury to any person,
including employees of Agency or of any subcontractor employed by Agency (including bodily
injury and death); claims based upon discrimination and/or violation of civil rights; or damages
to any property, arising or alleged to have arisen out of the work to be performed hereunder,
except any such injury or damages arising out of the sole negligence of the Town , its officers,
agents, or employees. Workers' Compensation insurance and/or self-insurance carried by the
Town do not apply to employees or volunteers acting in any capacity for Agency.
Town of Oro Valley
FINANCIAL PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT
Section 16. Insurance
Agency agrees to:
A. Obtain insurance coverage ofthe types and amounts required in this Section and keep such
insurance coverage in force throughout the life of this Agreement. All policies will contain
an endorsement providing that written notice be given to the Town at least thirty (30)
calendar days prior to termination , cancellation, or reduction in coverage in any policy.
B. The Comprehensive General Liability Insurance policy will include the Town
as an additional insured with respect to liability arising out of the performance of this
Agreement.
C. Agency will provide and maintain minimum insurance limits as follows:
COVERAGE AFFORDED
I. Workers ' Compensation
2. Employer's Liability
3. Comprehensive General
Liability Insurance --
Including:
(I) Products and Completed Operations
(2) Blanket Contractual
LIMITS OF LIABILITY
Statute
$100 ,000
$1 ,000,000 -Bodily Injury and
Combined Single Limit
$100 ,000 Property Damage
D . Agency shall adeq uate ly in sure it se lf against claims based upon unlawful discrimination and
violat ion of civi l rights. The cost of this insurance sha ll be borne by Agency.
Section 17. Use of the Town Logo
The Town Logo shall be used for the recognition of the Town's contribution to Agency only.
Section 18. Conflict ofInterest
This Agreement is subject to the conflict of interest provisions of A.R.S . § 38-511, ef seq.
Town of Oro Valley
FINANCIAL PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have exec uted thi s Agreeme nt as of th e date first
above written .
TOWN OF ORO V ALLEY, a municipal corporation
a,~t~AbVC5
ATTEST:
Julie K . Bower, as T wn Cle rk
and not perso nall y
Date: dO? I,~ ,
Dr. SatiSLHinlm , aSMayor
and not perso nally
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
-/ ~ ? <::::::
Tobin Ro sen, as Town Attorney
and not p erso nall y
Date: 1lLll1..
METROPOLITAN TUCSON CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU , a non-profit
Co rp orati on
~±hU
Agency Repre se ntative
and not personally
State of Ari zo na )
) ss .
Co unty of t'I(~rr ) _ _
On thi sdJ day of .J L{ ~ ,20 12, 8 j13EdVT t;. D ~I <AI1l> , known to me to
be the person whose name sub scnbed to th e w lthm mstrument , personally appeared before me
and acknow ledge d that he/she exec ut ed the same for the purpo ses conta in ed .
Given und er my hand and sea l on ,Th lj ;),3 ,20 12.
~
My Commiss ion Ex pire s: t /' q /,p, 0/0 t
QUARTERLY PROGRESS REPORT
July through September 2014
Submitted To: Amanda Jacobs, Economic Development Manager
By: Brent DeRaad, President/CEO
In accordance with Resolution No. (R) 12-37
Visit Tucson will initiate, implement and administer a comprehensive sales, promotion and advertising
program to attract an increasing number of convention delegates and vacationing tourists to the Town,
thereby providing revenues to the community through transient rental and sales taxes, and contributing to
the overall economic growth and continued viability of the tourism and hospitality industry. Below is data
on activity that Visit Tucson has addressed through this quarter and fiscal year.
Ongoing focuses for Visit Tucson will be attracting meetings and leisure travelers to Hilton El Conquistador
and other Town hotels, bringing competitions to the Oro Valley Aquatic Center, endurance events to the
Town and marketing attractions, including Tohono Chul Park.
Key Measures of Performance Adopted FY
2015
Current
Quarter
FYTD
2015
FYTD
2014
Convention Sales
Sales Leads 255 80 80 77
Site Inspections 28 9 9 9
Future Bookings 23 11 11 6
Room Nights of Future Bookings 10,500 3,209 3,209 3,210
Travel Industry Sales
Leads/Services 35 13 13 6
Promote to Targeted Tour Operator
Clients
500 313 313 232
Impressions Via Tour Operator Catalogs 750,000 964,100 964,100 3,000
Marketing
Unique Visitors to Visit Tucson Website 1 M 325,468 325,468 231,669
Unique Visitors to Oro Valley via Visit
Tucson Website
20,000 7,952 7,952 1,935
Visit Tucson’s 2014-15 Budgeted Revenue
Budget Percentage
Pima County: $3,200,000 45%
City of Tucson: $2,900,000 41%
Town of Oro Valley: $175,000 2%
Pascua Yaqui Nation: $75,000 1%
Tohono O’odham Nation: $75,000 1%
Private Sector: $690,850 10%
Total: $7,115,850 100%
July-September 2014 Oro Valley Highlights
Page 2
Additional 2014-15 Visit Tucson Performance Measures
1. Oro Valley will be featured in the Official Visitors Guide, along with the surrounding
jurisdictions.
Result: The 2015 Official Visitors Guide will be published later this year. The initial proof we’re
reviewing features Hilton El Conquistador Resort, Tohono Chul, Catalina State Park, Oro Valley
Aquatic Center and The Golf Club at Vistoso.
2. Provide Oro Valley with a minimum of a ½-page ad in Official Visitors Guide.
Result: We will provide Oro Valley with a ½-page ad and will follow up once the guide is
published with the location of the advertisement.
3. Promote Oro Valley events and attractions on Visit Tucson’s website and social media
sites.
Results: Visit Tucson promoted Saturday Market – Steam Pump Ranch on our website.
http://www.visittucson.org/articles/view/Fundraising-Dinner-for-Heritage-Foods-
Festival/1048/?fromMenu=1181.
What’s New in Tucson featured the Tucson Marathon.
http://www.visittucson.org/articles/view/What-s-New-in-Tucson---September-
2014/1069/?fromMenu=1181.
Following is a Visit Tucson Facebook post from August 2014. Two additional Oro Valley-related
posts were placed during the first quarter, as well.
July-September 2014 Oro Valley Highlights
Page 3
4. Feature the Oro Valley Aquatic Center in Visit Tucson’s online sports facility guide.
Result: Visit Tucson featured the Oro Valley Aquatic Center in Visit Tucson Sports’ online sports
facility guide throughout the first quarter of the 2014-15 fiscal year:
http://www.visittucson.org/sports/facilities/aquaov/
5. Town officials may attend trade shows with Visit Tucson staff at the expense of the
Town, except for the United States Sports Convention. Visit Tucson will cover the
registration fees for Town officials.
Result: Town officials did not join Visit Tucson staff at any trade shows between July 1 and Sept.
30, 2014.
6. Host www.visitorovalley.org and update the site based on information provided by
the Town’s Economic Development Manager or Webmaster.
Result: A thorough list of accommodations, arts & entertainment, outdoor recreation and
restaurants is listed on the website. We will gladly add requested information throughout the
year. Outdoor-recreation was updated.
7. Provide total tourism-based direct spending and total tourism-based impact numbers
from Visit Tucson Sports events held in Oro Valley.
Result: No sports events tied to Visit Tucson were held in Oro Valley between July and
September 2014.
8. Rebate 5% ($8,750) of Oro Valley’s 2014-15 investment in Visit Tucson into tourism-
related activities that benefit the Town.
Result: Visit Tucson did not rebate any of Oro Valley’s 2014-15 investment between July and
September 2014.
9. Consult with Town staff & officials on tourism sales & marketing initiatives, including,
but not limited to, promoting Town venues to special event operators, Mexico &
leisure marketing, & group sales initiatives.
Result: Allison Cooper, vice president of sales & marketing, met with Amanda Jacobs and others
from the Town, including the Oro Valley Chamber of Commerce to discuss the merits of Visit
Tucson’s summer campaign for the Town. Angel Natal, Director of Visit Tucson Sports, met
several times with Town staff to discuss event opportunities.
10. One Town official will serve on Visit Tucson’s board of directors.
Result: Vice Mayor Lou Waters is an active participant on Visit Tucson’s board of directors.
Meetings Economic Impact: Per the convention sales metrics listed on page 1, the economic
impact of 11 meetings booked between July 1-Sept. 30, 2014 by the Hilton El Conquistador
Resort and the Red Lion Inn & Suites Tucson North from Visit Tucson leads is $1,074,959.
Town Council Regular Session Item # E.
Meeting Date:11/19/2014
Requested by: Bayer Vella
Submitted By:Rosevelt Arellano
Development Infrastructure Services
Department:Development Infrastructure Services
Information
SUBJECT:
Request for approval of conceptual public art for the Copper Health Skilled Nursing Facility located on the
northwest corner of Rancho Vistoso and Sun City Boulevards
RECOMMENDATION:
The Conceptual Design Review Board recommended approval on October 14, 2014, subject to the
conditions in Attachment 1.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
This is a request for approval of Conceptual Public Art for the Copper Health Skilled Nursing Facility
(formerly known as Villa Fatima). To meet the public art requirement, the previous owner obtained a
public art approval in 2010. Since then, the previous owner sold the property and the new owner wishes
to use another art piece.
The applicant has completed a call for artist process and has hired artist, Cecilia Lueza, to install three
public art pieces (Attachment 2). The proposed artworks consist of one (1) metal sculpture and two (2)
tile mosaic benches.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
The Copper Health Skilled Nursing Facility is a commercial development consisting of a 23,000 sq. ft.
building. The project is nearing completion and the proposed art is necessary to meet the Town’s 1%
Public Art requirement. The proposed artworks conform to the Design Principles and Standards in the
Zoning Code.
Approvals-To-Date:
2010: Development Plan and original Conceptual Public Art
2014: Revised Development Plan
Conceptual Public Art Summary:
The applicant is the first to utilize the Town’s new call for artist process, which was established in
January 2014. The process generated over 40 public art applications from both local and national artists.
The final public art contract was awarded to Florida-based artist, Cecilia Lueza, to install three (3) public
art pieces.
The proposed artworks consist of one (1) freestanding sculpture and two (2) mosaic benches. These
artworks are located near the main building entrance which faces an open space area. The application
indicates that the proposed artworks are inspired by the colors and shapes of the Sonoran desert and are
designed with linear curves and warm, transitioning colors. To ensure durability, a condition has been
added requiring that the proposed artworks are treated with a protective sealing solution (i.e. rust
treatment and weather seal).
The following is information on the proposed public art:
Install one (1) freestanding sculpture in parking island
− Name: “Desert Rose”
− Dimensions: 14’ x 4’ (height and width)
− Materials: poly-chromed aluminum with a clear finish
− Colors: Transitioning colors from red to gold to copper
− Cost: $28,970
Install two (2) mosaic benches as planters under porte-cochere
− Name: untitled
− Dimensions: 20” x 9’ x 2’ (height, length and width)
− Materials: concrete and tile/ceramic/glass mosaics
− Colors: Various shades of red, orange and brown
− Cost: $1,250
Required art budget: $27,410
Proposed art budget: $30,220 ($28,970 + $1,250)
It is worth noting that the proposed benches contain a simple mosaic design which may not be
considered an artistic expression. Based on the fact that the value of the proposed benches ($1,250) is
not required for the 1% public art requirement, the CDRB has recommended approval of the benches.
Detailed analysis regarding conformance of the proposed Conceptual Public Art design in relation to the
Design Principles and applicable Design Standards is provided in the attached CDRB staff report
(Attachment 3).
Conceptual Design Review Board Review:
The Conceptual Public Art was considered by the CDRB at their October 14th meeting. The issues
discussed at the meeting included the proposed materials and maintenance. The CDRB found the
Conceptual Public Art to be in conformance with the applicable Design Principles and Standards, and
has recommended approval, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1.
A copy of the draft CDRB minutes are included as Attachment 4.
Public Comment:
Notice was provided to the following:
Homeowners Association mailing
Town Hall and website posting
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to approve the Conceptual Public Art for the Copper Health Skilled Nursing Facility, subject to
I MOVE to approve the Conceptual Public Art for the Copper Health Skilled Nursing Facility, subject to
the conditions in Attachment 1, finding that the Conceptual Public Art meets applicable Design Principles
and Standards.
OR
I MOVE to deny the Conceptual Public Art for the Copper Health Skilled Nursing Facility, finding that the
Conceptual Public Art does not meet applicable Design Principles and Standards.
Attachments
Attachment 1 - Conditions of Approval
Attachment 2 - Application
Attachment 3 - CDRB Staff Report
Attachment 4 - Draft CDRB Meeting Minutes
Attachment 1
Copper Health Senior Care Facility
Conceptual Public Art
Conditions of Approval
1. The proposed artworks shall be treated with a protective sealing solution to
ensure durability.
2. The applicant shall install a small metal plaque containing the artist’s name,
name of the artwork, installation date, and recognition of the Town’s Public Art
requirement.
Attachment 2
COPPER HEALTH ORO VALLEY
CONCEPTUAL PROPOSAL
1% FOR PUBLIC ART
August 23, 2014
Development and Infrastructure Services
Pl a nn ing Div is io n
11000 N La Ca nada Drive , Oro Va lley, Ar izo na 85737 • 520-229-48 15 • 520-7 42-1022 (Faxl
NOTICE TO APPLICANT It is the applican t/owner 's responsibility to ensure all private rules and regulations of the subdivision
are adhered to. Conta ct your HOA or property management company to determine all applicable requirements. Initials __ _
APPLICATION FORM
OV Case # (Office Use Only ):_O'-v'-1co2-'C1o'--0:..:3 ________________________ _
Application Type :_P_ub_l_ic_A_rt __________________________________ _
A. Project ManagerlDeveloper
Name: Terry McNellis
Firm : Copp er Sands, Inc .
Add ress : 3602 E. Greenway Ro ad, Suite 104
City: Phoenix State: Arizona Zip:,.,:;;850:::;,::3=:-2===-::-___ _
Telephone: 612 -991 -9062 cell phone Fax: 602 -368 -82 11 Email: gtmcnellis@stcroixre.com
B. Property Owner (s ), if more than one owner , attach list
Name: Copper Healt h of Oro Vall ey, LLC
Firm : Copper Healt h of Oro Va lley, Ll C
Address : 3602 E. Greenway Road, Su ite 104
City: Ph oenix State: Arizona Zip:-..::;850c::::3=c2_.,--_____ _
Telephone: 612 -991 -9062 cell phone Fax: 602-368-82 11 Email: gtmcnelli s@s tcroixre.com
C. Subject Property
ParcellTax Code: APN 223 -03 -352A
Legal Description /Property Address : 1119 East Rancho Vist oso Blvd ., O ro Valley, A Z 85755
Area of property: 1.70 Acres 04.1 65 SF)
Existing Zoning: C -1 Commercial District /PAD Proposed Zoning :--",C,:-.':1 =_-:-:-:-:-__ -:-::-:-:-____ _
Is Proposed Zoning in conformance with General Plan designation? [[ N/A [x ] Ves [ ] No
General Plan Designation: Planned Area Development
Existing Land Use: Commercial Proposed Land Use:""'C"'o"m"'m"e"'rc"'ia"'I ________ _
D. Previous Applications Relating To This Property
OV8-_______ _ OV9-_______ _ OV10-_______ _
OV11-______ _ OV12-06-06B OV13-· ______ _
E. Reason For Request
This application is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I am the owner of the above described property or have
been authorized by the owner to make this application.
Date Signature
NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION
Narrative description of the proposed art project including: intent and vision of the design,
placement of art, and the commissioning of a project artist, as well as how the proposed artwork
fits into the site plan and overall design theme of the project. Please note, conformance with the
Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised definition of “public artwork” must be achieved.
COPPER HEALTH ORO VALLEY
Copper Health Oro Valley, 1119 E. Rancho Vistoso Blvd., Oro Valley, AZ
Brief Overview of Copper Health Oro Valley
Copper Health Oro Valley will be licensed as a skilled nursing home and will also be licensed under
Medicare. While we are able to provide all levels of care with the exception of dementia, our primary
focus will be on "transitional care". This is care for individuals who have suffered a medical event that
generally requires hospitalization. Our role is to assist these individuals to return to full health and
functionality. We will provide physical therapy as well as occupational and speech therapy. We will also
provide respite, hospice and skilled care, as requested. Copper Health Oro Valley will provide
individualized health care in a "concierge" fashion. All services are directed on a case by case basis and
food and care will be available on demand. This facility will have first class finish treatments and many of
the units and common areas offer spectacular views of the Catalina Mountains.
http://www.copperhealthorovalley.com/
Copper Health worked with local administrative partner the Southern Arizona Arts and Cultural Alliance
to administer a national and locally Open Call to Artists, Request for Qualifications. Over 40 local and
national artists applied for consideration for the project. The 40 applications and resumes were
reviewed, of which 3 final artists were selected. Each artist prepared a comprehensive proposal based
on the allocated budget. Based on the comprehensive proposals submitted by each artist and artist
team, the final project was awarded to artist Cecialia Lueza. A final project proposal to incorporate
integrated seating, as well as a main sculptural focal piece, were selected for the Oro Valley
development project.
Selected Artist: Cecilia Lueza
SCULPTURE DESCRIPTION / CHARACTERISTICS
Identify typical art characteristics that illustrate the use and style of the art, including scale drawing, dimension,
height, materials and color palette, and if the art is to be freestanding, integrated, and/or functional.
The main sculpture is Inspired by the shapes and colors we find in nature. Its purpose is to enhance and
brighten the appearance of the building while adding a welcoming feeling to the property.
The main sculpture is comprised of four individual tapered vertical polychromed aluminum pieces
attached to each other at the base. As they sprout upwards they coalesce into individual curved forms.
Their wide ranging color palette transitions from red at the base all the way through to gold and copper
at the top.
The sculpture is freestanding and has its own steel pedestal that mounts directly to the concrete base
with lag bolts. Once the concrete pad with base bolts has been installed, the sculpture would be lower
into place with a small crane. Then, nuts and washers will be secured into the base bolts.
The fully exposed art sculpture has its base and supporting foundation, inside of a curbed and separated
landscape island. By doing this the artist has provided for the public safety by not hindering or
obstructing any adjacent vehicle traffic circulation, or obscuring vehicle site visibility.
Dimensions: 14 feet high (including base), 4 feet in diameter.
Materials: Polychrome aluminum panels. Concrete base.
The sculpture is not protected from the elements and is designed to withstand harsh weather
conditions, as it is fully exposed.
14 feet
4 feet
Copper Health Nursing Facility
Free-standing sculpture
"Desert Rose "
Polychrome aluminum, clear finishes .
Color palette transitions from red at
the base all the way through to gold
and copper at the top .
Dimensions : 14' x 4 ' x 3 '
!1 .Sfeet
Ceci lia Lueza 2014
INTEGRATED BENCHES DESCRIPTION
Two pigmented concrete benches with mosaic accents embedded. The benches will be integrated into
the planters located at the buildings’s main entrance.
The benches are protected from outdoor elements by being under the cover of the Porte-Cochere. The
main structural supports for the benches have been integrated into the structural walls of the building,
which provides for Public Safety. These benches cannot fall over or be relocated/repositioned to
become a hindrance to the entrance/exit path at the front entry doors of the building.
As per ADA requirements, the benchʼs seat area would be 20 inches above finish floor elevation, the
depth from front to back would be 24 inches.
The tile/ceramic/glass mosaics would be in warm colors as seen in the images, their top surfaces would
be sand blasted as well as the rest of the concrete surface/seat area with a fine grit media so as to
assure a slip-resistant surface so as to comply with ADA 4.37.7.
Materials: Pigmented concrete, mosaic tiles.
~
" ~ I---~
•
"
" " j--_--I
LOCATION
The location of public artwork shall be indicated on the Conceptual Site Plan (on 11”x17” paper).
If the artwork is incorporated on or adjacent to an exterior building elevation, provide
architecture renderings. Copies of the applicable plan are required.
~ .~ n
Ii ";;i· ..... ' .... ; " 1) ~~ • • : ~'t'
,~
'f" , ,
,ol -. ':' , .
,
•
':1'" ' •. ' 1.1 , ·;~i ·; .-., . ..... '-':'·,i."
",'I ; .,.' '." -+", .• ,'
•
• -.. , ., -, , , . '" . . • ......
• • •
" .,
•
•
•
IMPLEMENTATION TIMELINE
Sample Timeline from date of acceptance
ARTWORK INSTALLATION SCHEDULE
1 week from date of approval Shipping of benches
2 weeks later Benches installation complete
2 months from date of approval Transportation of sculpture
1 week later Sculpture installation complete
ESTIMATE OF PUBLIC ART VALUE / BUDGET
Preliminary estimate of public art commitment calculated with 1% of the building permit
valuation (construction cost) for the total project, including all phases of a multi-phase project.
Total Required 1% for Public Art Budget $27,410 (TOV provided assessment)
SAACA Administration Fee $ 1,500
Artist Selection (Request for Proposals) $ 600
Total Artist Budget $24,870
Other Developer Costs (Drawings and Staff, etc) $ 1,000
Redesigned corner planters to integrate Public
Art Bench Seat with raised planter and basin (SKA-10) $ 1,250
Supplemental Materials - Public Art documentation,
meetings, written narratives, created misc.
drawings for submission package $ 750
Structural Engineering for footing and wind resistance $ 250
TOTAL $30,220
ARTIST BREAKDOWN
Concept design $500
Materials: Benches: $1,250
Sculpture: $2,600
Fabrication $6,300
Engineering $2,000
Insurance $1,050
Transportation $2,800
Installation $1,500
Travel expenses $2,370
Project documentation $500
Artist fee $4,000
TOTAL ARTIST BREAKDOWN / CONTRACT $ 24,870
COMPLIANCE STATEMENT / SAFETY
A statement addressing compliance with each of the review criteria specified in the Oro Valley Zoning Code Section
27.3.G (Review Criteria) Provide a narrative depicting the installation of the artwork, how the artwork will be
protected, and provide for public safety. Please submit a graphic if necessary.
The proposed artworks shall not hinder public safety. The sculpture will be anchored to a concrete
foundation base to insure stability and safety. The benches will be integrated into the planters located
at the buildings’s main entrance. All elements of this project will be child friendly from the sculpture to
the benches. All corners will be smooth and rounded in order to ensure safety to the public.
The main sculpture is inspired by the shapes and colors we find in the Arizona landscape. Its purpose is
to enhance and brighten the appearance of the building while adding a welcoming feeling to the
property. The main sculpture is comprised of four individual tapered vertical polychromed aluminum
pieces attached to each other at the base. As they sprout upwards they coalesce into individual curved
forms. Its color palette transitions from red at the base all the way through to gold and copper at the
top.
The sculpture has its base and supporting foundation, inside of a curbed and separated landscape island.
By doing this the artist has provided for the public safety by not hindering or obstructing any adjacent
vehicle traffic circulation, or obscuring vehicle site visibility. The sculpture is not protected from the
elements and is designed to withstand harsh weather conditions, as it is fully exposed.
The benches are protected from outdoor elements by being under the cover of the Porte-Cochere. The
main structural supports for the benches have been integrated into the structural walls of the building,
which provides for Public Safety. These benches cannot fall over or be relocated/repositioned to
become a hindrance to the entrance/exit path at the front entry doors of the building. The materials for
the benches are pigmented concrete with mosaic accents embedded.
The artworks are distinctive pieces that will integrate with the site components as its design elements
will compliment the architectural characteristics of the building. The artworks will be placed in a highly
visible location that is not obstructed by trees, shrubs or any other objects.
These artworks will definitely enhance the aesthetic value of the building as they are designed to
incorporate the colors and textural elements of the southwest desert as well as the building’s color
scheme in a contemporary design.
The sculpture will be located inside of a curbed and separated landscape island. This will prevent any
potential obstruction from matured plants. It is located in front of the building buffered by sidewalks
and the parking area and therefore is protected from any potential obstructions from future
construction.
Artist, Cecilia Lueza certifies that the art works are original designs, are unique and have been designed
specifically for the Copper Health Nursing Facility. The final design was developed with input from the
architectural elements of the Copper Health Nursing Facility building. Thus, creating an art piece(s) that
integrates and complements the architecture of the Copper Health Nursing Facility and the Arizona
landscape.
ARTIST(S) BIOGRAPHY
Please note, conformance with the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised, definition of “artist” must be depicted.
Cecilia Lueza
Florida based artist Cecilia Lueza creates vibrant public art pieces in a varying range of artistic mediums.
From traditional media like painting and sculpture- in wood, metal, polyurethane, and fiberglass- to
much more recent resources, like mosaic and mural art.
Since 2000 she has been working on a variety of site-specific art projects and public art projects as well
as private and public art commissions in many cities throughout the United States. She has proven
experience in design concept, fabrication and installation of large-scale exterior artworks. She also has
demonstrated the ability to successfully collaborate with government agencies, design teams, architects,
art consultants, developers, engineers, and fabricators and bring the job in on time as promised.
Her work is part of many public and private collections in Miami, Fort Lauderdale, Indianapolis,
Washington DC, Rockville MD, Chattanooga TN, Pensacola FL, among others. In the last year she
completed three public art pieces in Washington DC , Miami, and Atlanta.
Art Samples / Previous Works
Conceptual Public Art ATTACHMENT 3
Conceptual Design Review Board Staff Report
CASE NUMBER :
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA ITEM:
STAFF CONTACT:
Applicant:
Request :
Location:
Recommendation :
SUMMARY:
OV5 14-002
October 14, 2014
4
Rose ve lt Arellano, Pl anne r
r are llano@orova ll eyaz.qo v (520) 229-4817
Terry McNell is, Copper Sands
Conceptual Public Art for Copper Health Skilled Nursinq Facility
Nort hwest corner of Sun City and Ran cho Vis toso Bou leva rds
Approve r equested Publ ic Artwork with co nditi ons
Th e applicant proposes public art for th e Copper Hea lth Skilled Nursing Facility (fo rmerly known as
Villa Fatima), currently under construction at the northea st corner of Ran cho Vis to so and Sun City
Boule vards (see Attachment 1). To meet the public art requirement, th e previous owner obta ined
ap pro val for public art in 2010, which was not in stal led. Th e new ow ners preferred a different style
of art and th erefore a new application is requ ired.
To repl ace the previo us artwork, th e app licant has co mpl eted a Call for Arti st Process a nd has hired
artis t, Cecilia Lu eza, to in stal l three pieces of art. Th e proposed artworks cons ist of one (1)
free sta nding sc ulpture and two (2) mosaic be nches. Th e propo sed scu lpture is e ntitled "Desert
Rose" and is created from poly-ch rome alum inum. Th e p roposed benches are unt itled and are
crea ted from concrete and til e, ce ram ic and glass mo sa ic pieces . The proposed artworks are
located nea r th e main building entrance w hi ch faces an open space area . A site plan show in g the
proposed art loca ti ons is in cluded as Attachm e nt 2.
Th e app licant's desc ription of the prop osed artworks is pro vid ed as Attachment 3.
BACKGROUND I DETAIL INFORMATION:
Previous Approva ls:
• 20 10: De ve lopment Pl an and original Conceptua l Public Art
• 2014: R evise d Development Plan
Request Details:
• Ins tall one (1) freestanding sc ulpture in parking island
OV514-002 Copper Health SkiUed Nursing Facility
Conceptual Design Review Board Staff Report
Name: "Desert Rose"
Dimensions: 14' x 4 ' (height and width)
-Materials: poly-chromed aluminum with a clear finish
Colors: Transitioning colors from red to gold to copper
-Total cost: $28 ,970
• Install two (2) mosaic benches as planters under porte-cochere
Name: untitled
Dimensions: 20" x 9' x 2 ' (height, length and width)
Materials: concrete and tile/ceramic/glass mosaics
-Colors: Various shades of red, orange and brown
-Total cost: $1,250
• Building permit valuation : $2,741,000
• Required art budget: $27,410
• Proposed art budget: $30,220
DISCUSSION / ANALYSIS:
Page 2 of5
The Copper Health Skilled Nursing Facility is a partially constructed development consisting of a
23,000 sq. ft. building. The project is nearing completion and the proposed art is necessary to meet
the Town 's 1 % Public Art requirement. This public art is the first to utilize the Town 's new Call for
Artist process, established in January, 2014. The applicant completed the Call for Artist process,
and received over 40 public art applications from both local and national artists. The final public art
contract was awarded to Florida based artist, Cecilia Lueza,
The proposed artworks have been evaluated with the Design Principles and Design Standards in
the Zoning Code as provided below .
Design Principle Analysis
The Design Principles contained in Section 27.3.H provide the primary guidance for evaluating
Public Art . Principles are shown below in italics, followed by staff commentary.
Qua/itv: Artwork demonstrates originality, artistic quality, and excellence in design and
craftsmanship; to be demonstrated through renderings, explanation of construction, materials, and
artist resume.
Staff Commentary: The applicant indicates that the proposed artworks are originals pieces
designed to withstand the desert environment. The proposed benches are located under a
porte-cochere and will be protected from the harsh desert environment. The proposed sculpture
will be exposed to rain and sun because it is located in a parking island.
Response to Context: Artworks should be appropriate in scale, material, form and content for the
immediate and general social and physical environments with which they are to relate.
Staff Commentary: The applicant indicates that the proposed artworks are inspired by the colors
and shapes of the Sonoran desert and are designed with linear curves and warm , transitioning
colors which resemble desert flora and warm weather climate . The 14' height of the sculpture is
appropriate in scale with the Single-story nursing facility. The desert inspired theme is
appropriate and relates to the Sonoran Desert and context of the natural area.
OV514-002 Copper Health Skilled Nursing Facility
Conceptual Design Review Board Staff Report
Page 3 of5
Durabilitv: Consideration should be given to structural and surface integrity, permanence, and
protection against theft, vandalism , weathering, and excessive maintenance and repair costs.
Staff Commentary: The location and construction of the proposed artworks reduce the chance
of being vandalized and stolen for the following reasons:
o The proposed artworks are located in front of the main building entrance where
surveillance is generally higher than other parts of the site.
o The proposed artworks are securely mounted to a concrete base or structural wa lls of
the building.
To ensure durability, a condition has been added requIring that the proposed artworks are
treated with a protective sealing solution (i.e. rust treatment and weather seal).
Integration: Where possible, in addition to meeting aesthetic requirements , artworks should also
serve to establish focal points, modify, enhance or define specific spaces or establish identity.
Staff Commentarv: The proposed mosaic benches will be in tegrated into the front of the building
as planters near the front entrance to the facility. The proposed sculpture is fourteen (14') tall
and is located in the front parking lot on the main drive aisle. Due to the height of the sculpture
and location of all three artworks at prominent locations, the proposed art will create a focal
point and sense of arrival for patients and visitors.
Safety: Artworks should not present a hazard or create unsafe conditions.
Staff Commentary: The proposed artworks will not negatively impact public safety for the
following reasons:
o The proposed artworks will have smooth and rounded edges.
o The proposed sculpture will be installed in an area of the parking island which does not
affect dri ve r visibility (i.e. not within a sight visibility triangle).
o To better serve the skilled nursing fa cility, the proposed benches will be slip-resistant
and designed to mee t the dimensional requ irements of the American Disability Act.
Diversity: Artworks shou ld contribute to a diversity of style, scale, media, artists, community values
and forms of expression within the Town.
Staff Commentary: The proposed artworks are designed with linear curves and warm,
transition ing colors which resemble the desert flora and wa rm weather climate. Due to their
unique materials , colors and designs, the proposed artworks will add to the diversity and style of
public art and do not duplicate other artworks found in the Town.
Visibility: Artworks should be visible and accessible for the purposes of public enjoyment and
security, considering pedestrian and vehicular traffic, lighting, active hours on site and future
development and vegetation growth.
Staff Commentary : T he proposed art will be visible to the publ ic because the y are located
outside and near the front building entrance . Due to its height, visibi lity of the proposed
OVS14-002 Copper Health SkiUed Nursing Facility
Conceptual Design Review Board Staff Report
Page 4 ofS
sculpture will not be obscured by the surrounding landscaping which consists of small shrubs ,
accents and ground cover plants.
Feasibility: Consideration should be given to the likelihood of successful completion of the artwork.
Factors to be considered include but are not limited to: project budget, timeline , artist's experience
and soundness of materials .
Staff Commentary: The proposed artworks will likely be installed because the project is nearing
completion , and the public art is required prior to the issuance of a Final Certificate of
Occupancy.
Advertising Elements : Public art shall not reflect or include advertising elements of a business or
corporation including colors, graphics, logos or other representations of corporate identity
Staff Commentary: The proposed artworks do not contain elements of corporate advertising. To
better recognize the Town 's public art collection , a condition requiring a small metal plaque
containing the artist's name, name of the artwork, installation date and recognition of the Town 's
Public Art requirement has been added.
Design Standards Analysis
The DeSign Standards contained in Addendum "A" provide the secondary guidance for evaluating
Conceptual Public Art. The Design Standard below is shown in italics, followed by staff
commentary.
Public art shall be integrated into the overall design of the project and shall be located in areas of
high visibility and use such as courtyards, seating areas, and along public roadways .
Staff Commentary: The proposed artworks will be located at the front of the building and in
areas of high visibility. Due to their height and /or location, the proposed artworks will be highly
visible , meeting the above Design Standard.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSION
The applicant's request includes the installation of one (1) metal sculpture and two (2) mosaic
benches. In staff's opinion, the proposed artworks are well suited for the site based on its relation to
the project design and natural context. The proposed art meets the public art prinCiples and the 1 %
construction cost of the building permit valuation.
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the following findings:
• The request is consistent with the Design Principles and Design Standards.
It is recommended that the Conceptual Design Review Board take the following action:
OVS14-002 Copper Health Skilled Nursing Facility
Conceptual Design Review Board Staff Report
Page 5 of 5
Recommend approval to the Town Council of the requested Conceptual Public Art under case
OV514-002, subject to the condition below.
SUGGESTED MOTIONS:
I move to recommend approval of the Conceptual Public Art for the Copper Health Skilled Nursing Facility,
based on the finding that the proposed public artworks are consistent with the DeSign Principles and
Design Standards, subject to the conditions in Attachment 4.
OR
I move to recommend denial of the Conceptual Public Art for the Copper Health Skilled Nursing Facility, as
it does not meet ___________ _
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Location Map
2 . Site Plan
3. Application
4. Conditions of approval
Bayer Vella, Planning Manager
I •
Attachment 4
MINUTES
ORO VALLEY CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
REGULAR SESSION
OCTOBER 14 , 2014
ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE
REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Eggerding called the Regular Session of the Conceptual Design Review
Board at 6 :00 PM .
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
ALSO PRESENT :
CALL TO AUDIENCE -
Richard Eggerding, Chairman
Bruce Wychoff, Vice Chairman
Sarah Chen , Member
Nathan Basken , Member
Jacob Herrington , Member
Harold Linton , Member
Kit Donley , Member
Lou Waters , Vice Mayor
Joe Hornat , Councilmember
There were no speaker requests .
COUNCIL LIAISON COMMENTS
Vice Mayor, Lou Waters , updated the Board on the following Town Council items:
-Modified Review Process associated with the ESLO ordinance , in regards to
the Olson Property Rezoning
Member Linton arrived to the meeting.
REGULAR AGENDA
Oc to be r 14, 201 4 Co nce ptual Des ign Rev iew Board Page 1 of 4
1 . REVIEW ANDIOR APPROVAL OF THE SEPTEMBER 9, 2014 REGULAR
SESSION MEETING MINUTES
MOTION: A motion was made by Bruce Wychoff, Vice Chairman and seconded by
Harold Linton , Member to approve the September 9 ,2014 regular session meeting
minutes.
MOTION carried , 6-0.
2. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF SIGN REGULATIONS FOR OUTDOOR
ADVERTISING FOR PLACITA DE ORO LOCATED AT TANGERINE ROAD
AND FIRST AVENUE, OV314 -002
Patty Hayes, Senior Planning Technician, presented the following:
-Applicant's Proposal
-Placita De Oro
-Wall Sign Colors
-Wall Sign Color Change
-Monument Sign Changes
-Monument Sign Location
-Summary and Recommendation
Mary Bahmer, with Addisigns , representing the Management Group for Placita De Oro ,
presented the following :
-Narrative
-Monument Signs
-Existing Monument Signs -Street View
-Site Plan
MOTION: A motion was made by Sarah Chen , Member and seconded by Jacob
Herrington, Member to recommend approval of the Placita De Oro Sign Criteria based
on the finding that the proposed Sign Criteria is consistent with the Design Principles .
MOTION carried , 6-0 .
3 . REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF CONCEPTUAL MODEL HOME
ARCHITECTURE FOR LENNAR HOMES AT RANCHO VISTOSO
NEIGHBORHOOD 10 PARCEL N LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER
OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD AND VISTOSO HIGHLANDS DRIVE,
OV1314-007
Patty Hayes , Senior Planning Technician , presented the following :
-Applicant's Proposal
Oc t o ber 14, 2014 Co nceptu al Des ign Rev iew Boa rd Pa ge 2 014
-Plan 3575 -3563
-Side Elevations
-Rear Elevations
-Vicinity Map
-Context: Nearby Homes
-Summary and Recommendation
Kevin Tarbox and James Knight, with Lennar Homes , reviewed points from staff's
presentation and made themselves available to answer questions.
MOTION: A motion was made by Jacob Herrington , Member and seconded by Nathan
Basken , Member to approve the Conceptual Model Home Architecture Design for
Lennar Homes at Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 10 Parcel N based on the finding that
the request is consistent with the Design Principles and Design Standards.
MOTION carried , 5-1 with Harold Linton, Member opposed.
4 . REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF CONCEPTUAL PUBLIC ART FOR THE
COPPER HEALTH SKILLED NURSING FACILITY, LOCATED ON THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF RANCHO VISTOSO AND SUN CITY
BOULEVARDS,OV514-002
Rosevelt Arellano , Planner, presented the following:
-Location Map
-Copper Health Skilled Nursing
-Previously Approved Artwork
-Artwork Location
-Proposed Benches
-Review Tools
-Summary/Recommendation
Mary Elka , from Copper Health Oro Valley , representing the owner, presented the
following:
-Selection Process
-Cecilia Lueza -Artist
-Sculpture Description/Characteristics
-Desert Rose
-Benches
-Location
-Artwork Installation Schedule/Sample
-Estimated of Public Art Value/Budget
-Artist Breakdown
-Compliance Statement
October 14, 2014 Conceptual Design Review Board Page 3 of 4
MOTION: A motion was made by Nathan Basken , Member and seconded by Sarah
Chen , Member to recommend approval of the Conceptual Public Art for the Copper
Health Skilled Nursing Facility , based on the finding that the proposed public artworks
are consistent with the Design Principles and Design Standards , subject to the
conditions in Attachment 4 .
Copper Health Senior Care Facility
Conceptual Public Art
Conditions of Approval
1. The proposed artworks shall be treated with a protective sealing solution to
ensure durability .
2 . The applicant shall install a small metal plaque containing the artist's name ,
name of the artwork, installation date, and recognition of the Town 's Public
Art requirement.
MOTION carried , 6-0.
PLANNING UPDATE (INFORMAITONAL ONLY)
Chad Daines , Principal Planner , presented the following :
-Update on Stone Canyon Club House approval from Town Council
-Upcoming Community Academy
-Upcoming neighborhood meetings
ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: A motion was made by Bruce Wychoff, Vice Chairman and seconded by
Jacob Herrington , Member to adjourn the October 14, 2014 Conceptual Design Review ·
Board meeting at 6:41 PM.
MOTION carried , 6-0.
Oc t o ber 14, 2014 Conceptual De sign Rev iew Bo ard Pag e 4 of 4
Town Council Regular Session Item # 1.
Meeting Date:11/19/2014
Requested by: Julie Bower Submitted By:Mike Standish, Town Clerk's Office
Department:Town Clerk's Office
Information
SUBJECT:
PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING AN APPLICATION FOR A
SERIES 12 (RESTAURANT) LIQUOR LICENSE FOR ALL THE BUZZ CAFE LOCATED AT 12985 N.
ORACLE ROAD, SUITE 165
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of this liquor license to the Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and
Control for the following reasons:
1. No protests to this license have been received.
2. The necessary background investigation was conducted by the Police Department.
3. The Police Department has no objection to the approval of the Series 12 Liquor License.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application for a new Series 12 (Restaurant) Liquor License has been submitted by
Owner/Agent Cathy Roberts for All the Buzz Cafe located at 12985 N. Oracle Road, Suite 165.
Ms. Roberts has submitted all necessary paperwork to the Town of Oro Valley and the Arizona
Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and has paid all related fees associated with applying for the
liquor license ($500 Application Processing Fee).
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
This non-transferable, on-sale retail privileges liquor license allows the holder of a restaurant license to
sell and serve spirituous liquor solely for consumption on the premises of an establishment which derives
at least forty percent (40%) of its gross revenue from the sale of food. Failure to meet the 40% food
requirement shall result in revocation of the license.
In accordance with Section 4-201 of the Arizona Revised Statutes, the application was posted for 20
days on the premises of the applicant's property, ending November 5, 2014. No protests were received
during this time period.
Police Chief Daniel Sharp completed a standard background check on All the Buzz Cafe and
Owner/Agent Cathy Roberts. Chief Sharp has no objection to the approval of the Series 12 (Restaurant)
License.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Per Ordinance No. (O)11-16, the Town of Oro Valley charges a $500 liquor license application
processing fee to cover the costs incurred by the Town to process the application.
Per Section 8-2-6 Schedule of the Oro Valley Town Code, persons licensed by the State of Arizona to
deal in spirituous liquor within the Town shall pay an annual license fee of $80.00 to the Town.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to (recommend or deny) approval of the issuance of a Series 12 Liquor License to the Arizona
Department of Liquor Licenses and Control for Cathy Roberts and principals for All the Buzz
Cafe located at 12985 N. Oracle Road, Suite 165.
Attachments
All the Buzz Cafe Series 12 Liquor License
DANIEL G. SHARP
C H I EI' OF PO LI C E
TO : M ike Standish
FROM: ~ Daniel G. Sharp
DAT E : Nov 1,2014
RE: Background In vestigatio n , Applicat ion for Liqu or Licen s e
All the Buzz Cafe
12985 N Oracl e Road # 165
On Nov 1,20 14 , the Oro Val ley Po li ce De p a rtm e nt completed the s ta ndard background
c heck o n A ll the Buzz Cafe and Own e r/Age nt Cat h y Roberts.
T he Oro Va ll ey Police D epartm ent has no o bj ection for the iss uance ofa liqu or li ce n se to
A ll the Buzz Cafe at 12985 N. Oracle Road # 165.
11000 N. La Caliad. Drive· Oro Valley, AZ 85737
Phone 520-229-4900 • F.x 520-229-4979 • www.ovpd.org
Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control
800 West Washif]gtbn, 5th Floor
Phoenix, Arizbna 85007
www.azliquor.gov
602-542-5141
APPLICATION FOR LIQUOR LICENSE
OCT 14'14PM 4:17 T OV
. ' TYPEOR PRINT WITH BLACK INK .' ~i
Notice: Effective Nov. 1, 1997. All Owners. Agents. Partners. Stockholders. Officers. or Managers actively invotved in the day to day operations of ~
the business must attend a Department approved liquor law trajning·course or provide proof of attendance within the last five years. See 1Bge 5 of'::::
the Liquor licensing requirements.·· r -
SECTION 1 This application is for a: SECTION 2 Type of ownership: .;;;' o MORE THAN ONE LICENSE o INTERIM PERMIT Complete Section 5
(:8J NEW LICEN SE Complete Sections 2, 3, 4, 13, 14, 15, 16 . o PERSON TRANSFER (Bars & Liquor Stores ONLY) .
Complete Sections 2,3,4,11,13,15,16' .' o LOCATION TRANSFER (Bars and liquor Stores ONLY)
Complete Sections 2, 3, 4, 12, 13, 15, 16 o PROBATEIWILL ASSIGNMENT/D IVORCE DECREE
Complete Sections 2, 3, 4, 9, 13, 16 (fee not required) o GOVERNMENT Complete Sections 2, 3, 4, 10, 13, 15, 16 .
O ~ J.T.WRO.S. Complete Section 6 ri' o INDIVIDUAL Complete Section 6 "i~ o PARTNERSHIP Complete Section 6 :::,: o CORPORATION Complete Section 7 1~'
IjlI LIMITED LIABILITY CO. Complete Section 7.L· o CLUB Complete Section 8
o GOVERNMENT Complete Section 10 o TRUST Complete Section 6 o OTHER (Explain) _________ _
S-E-COON 3" T~ ;;;e'::-a;7ee:-L;-;;;N;-;(S): _____ -;:::==::=-~-=~=i-=d-=I=O:=;;:Lf~3~'+=O=:=;_
1 . Type of License(s): #= CL 12 g S±Cu,c., "I (j .ref--. I 1 ?ftlartment U se Only
2 . Total fees attached: c;$~!-\;;:-;.~)--:-':::""""'=-==-==::-:-:=-:-:=-=--'
APPLICATION FEE AND INTERIM PERMIT FEES (IF APPLICABLE) ARE NOT REFUNDABLE.
The fees allowed under A.RS. 44-6852 will be charged for all dishonored checks. ----------
SECTION 4 Applicant
1. Owner/Agent's Name: ~ Rob ~ r-T S CCl.+-h ( /
(Insert one name ONLY to appear ~nse) Last /'" r Fi rs t'
2. Corp./Partnership/L.L.C.: A:bA BU2. Z.-LtL+--€.../ LLC
(Exactly as it appears on Articles of Inc. or Articles of Org .)
PI01d-S";)/
nll'de.f k
M iddle
J3[''Os39-)-S-
4. Principal Street Location _---'c=--'----'-"_L-~'_"_-----'-"-'---'---'='L-'>-!="-'-<'_'_=-'-=-~ _ _LJ"_"__'_=_'f_l'l.L-~
(Do no t use PO Box Number) (..e..1 ( City County ip
5. Business Phone: 520 ~ n-dS -0'05",5 Daytime Phone: <) z.o . ""tv I -Cob 0) Email: C CL+ho.t 0 a ( (f/,.p (;"",<.7 (u(;i
6. Is the business located within the incorporated limits of the above city or town? !ZIYES ONO COrn
7 . MailingAddress l~qbS= AI· DrlAClj /U :;r<?I&') hCSoo /42.. ~Sl=S1
City Sta te Zip
8. Price paid for license only bar, beer and wine, or liquor store: Type $ Type $
Fees: ~D
Application
..
Interim Permit
DEPARTMENT USE ONLY
Site Inspection Finger Prints $ -----=:-:::--:-:-'n~J.?--l-,,.,,--·-=
TOTAL OF ACt FEES
Is Arizona Statement of Citizenship & Alien Status For State Benefits complete? tii YES o NO
Accepted by: ~) Date 10 1 ~llq Lic . #~\ ILa~LD~Lf~:J-Li.f~O~ __ _
117/2013 'Disabled individuals requiring special accommodation, please call (602) 542-9027.
1
License Type: Series 12 Restaurant
This non-transferable , on-sale retail privileges liquor license allows the holder of a
restaurant license to sell and serve spirituous liquor solely for consumption on the
premises of an establishment which derives at least forty percent (40%) of its gross
revenue from the sale of food. Failure to meet the 40% food requirement shall result in
revocation of the license .
Town Council Regular Session Item # 2. a.
Meeting Date:11/19/2014
Requested by: Patty Hayes
Submitted By:Patty Hayes, Development Infrastructure Services
Department:Development Infrastructure Services
Information
SUBJECT:
RESOLUTION NO. (R)14-57, DECLARING THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE ORO VALLEY
ZONING CODE SECTION 28.6.B., RELATING TO TEMPORARY ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION
SIGNS, PROVIDED AS ATTACHMENT 1, EXHIBIT "A" WITHIN THE ATTACHED RESOLUTION AND
FILED WITH THE TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE, A PUBLIC RECORD
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
This is a procedural item to declare the draft ordinance a matter of public record. The draft ordinance has
been posted online and made available in the Town Clerk's office. If the final version is adopted and
approved by Town Council, it will be made available in the same manner.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
Once adopted by Town Council, this proposed resolution will become a public record and will save the
Town on advertising costs since the Town will forgo publishing the entire draft ordinance in the
newspaper. The current version of the draft ordinance has been posted on the Town's website and a
printed copy is available for public review in the Town Clerk's office. Once adopted, the final version will
be published on the Town's website.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The Town will save on advertising costs by meeting publishing requirements by reference, without
including the pages of amendments.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to (adopt or deny) Resolution No. (R)14-57, declaring the proposed amendments to the Oro
Valley Zoning Code Revised Section 28.6.B, attached hereto as Attachment 1, Exhibit “A” and filed with
the Town Clerk, a public record.
Attachments
(R)14-57 Amending Section 28.6.B.
C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 6\@BCL@F813B2A7\@BCL@F813B2A7.doc Town of Oro Valley Attorney’s Office/ca/072612
RESOLUTION NO. (R)14-57
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, DECLARING AS A
PUBLIC RECORD THAT CERTAIN DOCUMENT TO BE
PLACED WITHIN CHAPTER 28, “SIGNS”, SECTION 28.6.B.7, OF
THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED AND ENTITLED
THE “ROAD CONSTRUCTION SIGN”;, ATTACHED HERETO AS
EXHIBIT “A” AND FILED WITH THE TOWN CLERK
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO
VALLEY, ARIZONA, that certain document of the Oro Valley Town Code, entitled
Chapter 28, “Signs”, Section 28.6.B.7, “Road Construction Sign” is attached hereto as
Exhibit “A”, three copies of which are on file in the Office of the Town Clerk, is hereby
declared to be a public record, and said copies are ordered to remain on file with the
Town Clerk.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley,
Arizona this 19
th day of November, 2014.
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
Dr. Satish I. Hiremath, Mayor
ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie K. Bower, Town Clerk Tobin Sidles, Legal Services Director
Date: Date:
C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 6\@BCL@F813B2A7\@BCL@F813B2A7.doc Town of Oro Valley Attorney’s Office/ca/072612
EXHIBIT “A”
7. ROAD CONSTRUCTION SIGN
A) DEFINITION: TEMPORARY SIGNAGE TO ENHANCE VISIBILITY OF PROPERTIES WITH
COMMERCIAL, MULTI-FAMILY OR RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS DURING ROAD
CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS.
B) APPLICABILITY: AREAS THAT WILL BE DIRECTLY IMPACTED BY A ROAD CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT AS DETERMINED BY THE TOWN ENGINEER AND PLANNING AND ZONING
ADMINISTRATOR.
C) TYPE:
I.SIGN MAY BE A BANNER OR RIGID MATERIAL SUCH AS WOOD, METAL OR
SIMILAR MATERIAL.
II.SINGLE OR DOUBLE FACED.
III.COPY MAY BE MODIFIED AFTER ISSUANCE OF PERMIT WITHIN THE
PARAMETERS SET FORTH IN THE CODE.
IV.ANY CHANGE IN SIGN LOCATION WILL REQUIRE A NEW PERMIT.
V.SIZE OF COPY MUST BE APPROVED BY THE TOWN ENGINEER TO ASSURE SAFETY.
D) QUANTITY:
I.ONE SIGN FOR THE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY PER STREET FRONTAGE IMPACTED
BY THE ROAD CONSTRUCTION.
II.IF FRONTAGE IS GREATER THAN 600 FEET AND THERE IS MORE THAN 1
ENTRANCE TO THE DEVELOPMENT, A SECOND SIGN IS PERMITTED.
III.IF FRONTAGE IS GREATER THAN 800 FEET, ONE ADDITIONAL SIGN MAY BE
INSTALLED.
E) AREA OF SIGN:
I.32 SQUARE FEET FOR A COMMERCIAL PROPERTY WITH 1 TO 4 OWNERS OR
BUSINESS LESSEES.
II.64 SQUARE FEET FOR A COMMERCIAL PROPERTY WITH 5 OR MORE OWNERS OR
BUSINESS LESSEES.
F) HEIGHT: 10’
G) LOCATION: ON PRIVATE PROPERTY WHERE THE BUSINESS IS LOCATED.
H) SETBACK: NONE, UNLESS ADDITIONAL AREA IS REQUIRED FOR UTILITY OR ROAD WORK.
TOWN ENGINEER MUST DETERMINE IF PROPOSED LOCATION IS SAFE AND DOES NOT
INTERFERE WITH CONSTRUCTION.
C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 6\@BCL@F813B2A7\@BCL@F813B2A7.doc Town of Oro Valley Attorney’s Office/ca/072612
I)ILLUMINATION: NONE
J)COLOR: LETTERING AND BACKGROUND MAY BE ANY COLOR EXCEPT FLUORESCENT OR
IRIDESCENT.
K) DURATION: LENGTH OF TIME THE SIGN IS PERMITTED WILL BE DETERMINED BY THE
TOWN ENGINEER AND PLANNING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR AND SHALL NOT
EXCEED SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION OF THE ROAD CONSTRUCTION PROJECT.
L) THE TOWN ENGINEER AND PLANNING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR SHALL BE
PERMITTED TO ADMINISTRATIVELY APPROVE MODIFICATIONS TO ROAD
CONSTRUCTION SIGNAGE IF EACH OF THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA HAVE BEEN SATISFIED:
I.THERE ARE UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES DUE TO ROAD DESIGN OR
CONSTRUCTION.
II.THE PROPOSED CHANGES DO NOT HAVE A GREATER OVERALL IMPACT
THAN THE ALLOWED SIGN TYPE.
III.THE PROPOSED CHANGES ARE BASED ON EXISTING STANDARDS FROM AN
ALLOWED SIGN TYPE IN THE ZONING CODE.
Town Council Regular Session Item # 2. b.
Meeting Date:11/19/2014
Requested by: Patty Hayes
Submitted By:Patty Hayes, Development Infrastructure Services
Department:Development Infrastructure Services
Information
SUBJECT:
PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE NO. (O)14-14, AMENDING SECTION 28.6.B OF THE ORO VALLEY
ZONING CODE TO ADD A NEW TEMPORARY SIGN TYPE FOR BUSINESSES LOCATED WITHIN
ROAD CONSTRUCTION AREAS
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the proposed revision depicted in
Attachment 1, Exhibit “A”.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Businesses located near a road construction project often have difficulty maintaining adequate
identification through the duration of a road project due to the lack of opportunities in the Sign Code. In
the past, business owners concerned about the impact of road construction would request special sign
relief from Town Council. This process caused significant delays in obtaining approvals for special
signage, thus causing greater financial hardship to the business.
This proposed amendment would add a new sign type to the Zoning Code which could be utilized by
businesses impacted by road construction projects. The amendment would provide the affected
businesses the ability to obtain a temporary sign permit through standard permitting processes. The
permit would allow the sign to remain on the property until substantial completion of the road project.
The amendment was initiated by the Planning and Zoning Commission on October 7, 2014. The
Commission considered the amendment at a special session on October 21, 2014, and has
recommended approval.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
Existing Sign Code Provisions:
The current Sign Code allows a business to display a 16 square foot banner for a period of 30 days for
seasonal events and promotions. These 30 day temporary banners can be displayed up to 4 times a
year for a total of 4 months.
A road construction project could possibly take up to 2 years to complete and may obscure business
access and limit visibility of signage during that time. The Code does not have the sign type available to
accommodate the affected businesses through the entire duration of a road project.
Proposed Amendment
The proposed sign type would allow a business to install a larger temporary sign and allow it to remain
until substantial completion of the adjacent road project.
Applicability:
Commercial and multi-family properties or religious institutions directly impacted by a road construction
project would be the only properties allowed to utilize the proposed sign type.
Zoning Code Amendment Analysis:
The proposed road construction sign standards relative to size, height, quantity and location are
consistent with those currently in the temporary and permanent sign regulations of the code.
Customized elements were created for this sign type, such as setback and duration, in order to ensure
signs are installed in locations that do not create safety hazards and can remain on the property for a
period of time that benefits the affected businesses.
Below is a table comparing the current temporary sign allowances for special events to the proposed new
sign type:
*Business owners could choose to use banner material or ridged materials such as wood, metal or
plastic.
**Additional setback could be required if an area of land is required to be kept clear for utility installation
or road construction.
***32 sq ft for a property occupied by 1 to 4 owners or business lessees.
64 sq ft for a property occupied by 5 or more owners or business lessees.
The new sign type also includes a provision which allows the Planning and Zoning Administrator and
Town Engineer latitude to review and approve alternatives to the proposed sign standards. This provision
allowing for a modification will enable the Town to recognize unique situations that could occur with each
road construction project and customize the standards subject to the criteria provided in section 7.L of
Attachment 1, Exhibit A.
General Plan Analysis
Details Currently Allowed Proposed Sign Type
Sign Type Temporary Sign for Special Event Temporary Sign for Road Construction
Material Banner Banner or ridged material*
Location On private property On private property
Setback None None**
Sign Area
(size)
16 sq ft 32 sq ft or 64 sq ft***
Height 4’10’
Quantity 1 per business per street frontage
1 per property
2 for properties with greater than 600’
frontage
3 for properties with greater than 800’ of
frontage
Duration 30 days for each permit for a
Maximum of 4 times per year
Until substantial completion of
road project as determined by the
Town Engineer and Planning Administrator
Permit Fees $50.00 for every 30 day permit.
Yearly total of $200.00 $50.00 per each sign
The Zoning Code amendment was reviewed with the standards of the General Plan’s Vision, Goals and
Policies. Listed below are relevant policies within the General Plan relating to signage in italics, followed
by staff commentary:
Signage: Signage controls have to balance citizens concerns about the increasing level of signage with
the needs of businesses to attract customers.
Policy 2.1.10: The Town shall create standards for signage to provide information and direction to allow
businesses to attract and maintain customers with the least intrusive signage possible.
The proposed sign type addition will allow additional signage for businesses during a time when they
may otherwise be unable to effectively utilize existing signage. Specific standards were included in the
new sign type to prevent an over-concentration of signs, which includes limits on duration, location,
quantity and size of signs. The proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan policies.
Planning and Zoning Commission Review :
The amendment was initiated by the Planning and Zoning Commission on October 7, 2014, and heard
by the Commission on October 21, 2014. The main topics discussed at the meeting included sign
locations and the size of lettering. At the conclusion of the public meeting, the Commission voted to
recommend approval of the amendment. The Planning and Zoning Commission staff report is included
as Attachment 2 and the draft minutes are included as Attachment 3.
Public Notification and Comment
Public notice has been provide as follows:
All HOAs in the Town were notified of this hearing
Public hearing notice was posted:
In the Territorial newspaper
At Town hall
On the Town website
To date, staff has received one letter in support of the amendment (Attachment 4).
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to APPROVE Ordinance No. (O)14-14, an amendment to Section 28.6.B of the Oro Valley
Zoning Code adding a new temporary sign type for businesses located in areas of road construction.
OR
I MOVE to DENY Ordinance No. (O)14-14, an amendment to Section 28.6.B of the Oro Valley Zoning
Code for a new temporary sign type for businesses located in areas of road construction.
Attachments
(O)14-14 Adding Section 28.6.B Temporary Signs
Planning & Zoning Commission Report
Planning & Zoning Commission Draft Minutes
Letter from Citizen
C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 6\@BCL@4814DA61\@BCL@4814DA61.doc
ORDINANCE NO. (O)14-14
AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA,
AMENDING THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED, CHAPTER
28, SIGNS, BY ADDING NEW SUBSECTION 28.6.B.7 “ROAD
CONSTRUCTION SIGN”;REPEALING ALL RESOLUTIONS,
ORDINANCES AND RULES OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY IN
CONFLICT THEREWITH; PRESERVING THE RIGHTS AND DUTIES
THAT HAVE ALREADY MATURED AND PROCEEDINGS THAT HAVE
ALREADY BEGUN THEREUNDER
WHEREAS, on March 13, 1981, the Mayor and Council approved Ordinance (O)81-58, which
adopted that certain document entitled “Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised (OVZCR); and
WHEREAS, the Town deems it necessary to amend the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised,
Chapter 28, “Signs”, by adding Section 28.6.B.7 “Road Construction Sign” to allow a special
sign type for commercial, religious institutions and multi-family properties during road
construction; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a meeting on October 21, 2014, and
voted to recommend approval of amending Chapter 28 Signs, Section 28.6.B.7, Road
Construction Sign; and
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro
Valley, Arizona, that:
SECTION 1.That certain document entitled Chapter 28, Signs, Section 28.6.B.7, Road
Construction Sign, of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised, attached hereto as Exhibit “A” to
allow a special sign type for commercial, religious institutions and multi-family properties
during road construction is hereby approved.
SECTION 2.All Oro Valley ordinances, resolutions or motions and parts of ordinances,
resolutions or motions of the Council in conflict with the provision of this Ordinance are hereby
repealed.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this
19th day of November, 2014.
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
Dr. Satish I. Hiremath, Mayor
C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 6\@BCL@4814DA61\@BCL@4814DA61.doc Town of Oro Valley Attorney’s Office/ca/0408112
ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie K. Bower, Town Clerk Tobin Sidles, Legal Services Director
Date: Date:
C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 6\@BCL@4814DA61\@BCL@4814DA61.doc Town of Oro Valley Attorney’s Office/ca/0408113
EXHIBIT “A”
7. ROAD CONSTRUCTION SIGN
A) DEFINITION: TEMPORARY SIGNAGE TO ENHANCE VISIBILITY OF PROPERTIES WITH
COMMERCIAL, MULTI-FAMILY OR RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS DURING ROAD
CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS.
B) APPLICABILITY: AREAS THAT WILL BE DIRECTLY IMPACTED BY A ROAD CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT AS DETERMINED BY THE TOWN ENGINEER AND PLANNING AND ZONING
ADMINISTRATOR.
C) TYPE:
I.SIGN MAY BE A BANNER OR RIGID MATERIAL SUCH AS WOOD, METAL OR
SIMILAR MATERIAL.
II.SINGLE OR DOUBLE FACED.
III.COPY MAY BE MODIFIED AFTER ISSUANCE OF PERMIT WITHIN THE PARAMETERS
SET FORTH IN THE CODE.
IV.ANY CHANGE IN SIGN LOCATION WILL REQUIRE A NEW PERMIT.
V.SIZE OF COPY MUST BE APPROVED BY THE TOWN ENGINEER TO ASSURE SAFETY.
D) QUANTITY:
I.ONE SIGN FOR THE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY PER STREET FRONTAGE IMPACTED
BY THE ROAD CONSTRUCTION.
II.IF FRONTAGE IS GREATER THAN 600 FEET AND THERE IS MORE THAN 1
ENTRANCE TO THE DEVELOPMENT, A SECOND SIGN IS PERMITTED.
III.IF FRONTAGE IS GREATER THAN 800 FEET, ONE ADDITIONAL SIGN MAY BE
INSTALLED.
E) AREA OF SIGN:
I.32 SQUARE FEET FOR A COMMERCIAL PROPERTY WITH 1 TO 4 OWNERS OR
BUSINESS LESSEES.
II.64 SQUARE FEET FOR A COMMERCIAL PROPERTY WITH 5 OR MORE OWNERS OR
BUSINESS LESSEES.
F) HEIGHT: 10’
G) LOCATION: ON PRIVATE PROPERTY WHERE THE BUSINESS IS LOCATED.
H) SETBACK: NONE, UNLESS ADDITIONAL AREA IS REQUIRED FOR UTILITY OR ROAD WORK.
TOWN ENGINEER MUST DETERMINE IF PROPOSED LOCATION IS SAFE AND DOES NOT
INTERFERE WITH CONSTRUCTION.
C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 6\@BCL@4814DA61\@BCL@4814DA61.doc Town of Oro Valley Attorney’s Office/ca/0408114
I) ILLUMINATION: NONE
J) COLOR: LETTERING AND BACKGROUND MAY BE ANY COLOR EXCEPT FLUORESCENT OR
IRIDESCENT.
K) DURATION: LENGTH OF TIME THE SIGN IS PERMITTED WILL BE DETERMINED BY THE
TOWN ENGINEER AND PLANNING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR AND SHALL NOT
EXCEED SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION OF THE ROAD CONSTRUCTION PROJECT.
L) THE TOWN ENGINEER AND PLANNING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR SHALL BE
PERMITTED TO ADMINISTRATIVELY APPROVE MODIFICATIONS TO ROAD
CONSTRUCTION SIGNAGE IF EACH OF THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA HAVE BEEN SATISFIED:
I.THERE ARE UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES DUE TO ROAD DESIGN OR
CONSTRUCTION.
II.THE PROPOSED CHANGES DO NOT HAVE A GREATER OVERALL IMPACT THAN
THE ALLOWED SIGN TYPE.
III.THE PROPOSED CHANGES ARE BASED ON EXISTING STANDARDS FROM AN
ALLOWED SIGN TYPE IN THE ZONING CODE.
Zoning Code Amendment
Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report
SUBJECT:
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA ITEM:
STAFF CONTACT:
Request:
L ocation :
Sign Code Amendment OV714-00B
October 21,2014
Patty Hayes , Senior Planning Techni c ian
._-_._-----------------_._------
Zoning Code Amendment to add a sign type, Road Construction Signs
Commercial, Religious Institutions and Multi-Family (apartments)
Properties
Recommendation: Recommend approval
--_._--_._------------------_._------
SUMMARY:
Staff proposes to add a new temporary sign type to the Zoning Code for businesses located in
areas of road construction. The new sign type , if approved, would provide businesses impacted
by road construction the ability to obtain a temporary sign permit for the duration of the road
project, which can take up to 2 years or more to complete .
Currently, the sign code allows a business to obtain a banner permit f or a 30 day time period, up
to 4 times a year. Due to the time constraints, a business can be left without temporary signage
for significant portions of the year when access to their property could be limited and/or their
monument signs obscured (Attachment 1). The limited access or visibility to a commercial
business, religious institution or apartment complex can create negative impacts to the property
and surrounding area by reducing the number of customers who visit the business.
Th e sign code is intended to provide a ba lance between the need to promote business, maintain
public safety and th e To w n's aesthetic standards. The proposed sign code amendment
(Attachment 2) would add a temporary sign type that could be utilized during times when a
commercial business, rel ig ious facility or apartment complex is imp acted by major road
construction projects.
BACKGROUND:
In th e past, individua l business owners concemed about the impact of road construction would
request that T ow n Council grant temp o rary reli ef from the sign code to all ow temporary signs in
road construction areas. Thi s process causes sign ifi ca nt delays in obtaining appro vals for
special road co nstru c ti o n signage, thus causing greater financial hardship .
Currently, th e sign code permit s tempo rary bann ers, which ma y be erected 4 tim es per year fo r
30 days ea ch . The time re stri ctions on temp orary banners leave busin ess es, w ho are impacted
by road construct ion, without signs for a significan t portion of the year. Such sign allowances
also do not provide a business the ex tended sign reli ef when warranted. Th e prop ose d new sign
Attachment 2
OV714-008 Sign Code Amendment Page 2 of 4
Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report
---~----'--~--'--~'---"'---'----'----'--' -'-~----'----------.---'----'----'-------.-.-.--.-.,-.. ,., -
type is a proactive solution which will allow the affected properties the opportunity to identify their
businesses for the duration of the road construction .
Past Approvals
January 2011:
November 2012 :
August 2014:
Temporary sign relief for Oracie Road improvement
Temporary sign relief for Lambert Lane road improvements
Temporary sign relief for the Oracle Road improvements
Proposed Changes
The proposed Zoning Code amendment would add a new temporary sign type that would allow
businesses adjacent to road construction the ability to obtain a sign permit through standard
permit review processes versus the lengthy process of requesting temporary relief through Town
Council. The new sign type would be a permanent addition to the code which would allow the
Town Engineer and Planning and Zoning Administrator to administratively approve permits in the
same manner as other temporary signs.
The proposed sign type, as detailed in Attachment 2, is larger than most temporary signs and
could remain on the property for longer periods of time as opposed to the limited time currently
allowed in the code as detailed in the table below. The signs could be banner type of sign or a
rigid material such as wood or metal.
_, ~.~~"". _____ " c •. _._ .. , ,_,_ ... _ .... , .. , ·,_a. , __ ., .... _ .............. , ............. _._ ... _~._ ~ ~_, ••.• _ .. " .. , .. "" .... _.~ .. ~_" .•• .,.-, .' .. _ •................. .,. .. '"'~ •• , , ... _~_ .. ,
DISCUSSION I ANALYSIS:
The code allows temporary signs for businesses to advertise special events for limited periods of
time. Below is a table comparing the current temporary sign allowances for special events to the
proposed amendment:
Details Currently Allowed Proposed Sign Type
Sign Type Temporary Sign for Special Event Temporary Sign for Road Construction
Material Banner Banner or ridged material '
Location On private property On private property
Setback None None"
Sign Area (s 16 sq ft 32 sq ft o r 64 sq ft ',·
Height 4 ' 10 '
Quantity 1 per business per street frontage 1 per property
2 for properties with greater than 600'
frontage
3 for properties with greate r than 800' of
frontage
Duration 30 days for each permit for a Until substantial completion of
Maximum of 4 times per year road project as determined by the
Town Engineer and Planning Administrator
Permit Fees $50.00 for every 30 day permit. $50.00 per each sign
Yearly total of $200.00 , Business owners cou ld choose to use banner mate nal or ndged m atenals such as wood, meta l or plastic.
"Additi onal setback cou ld be required if an area of land is requi red to be kept clear for utility installation or road
cons tru ction.
"'32 sq It for a property occupied by 1 to 4 owners or business lessees .
64 sq It for a property occupied by 5 o r more owne rs or business lessees .
--.--
OV714-008 Sign Code Amendment Page 3 of 4
Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report
Standards such as size, height, quantity and location are consistent with those currently in
the temporary and permanent sign regulations of the code. For example, the code allows a
sign to be installed at a specific height above the ground but also allows the height of the
sign to be measured from the grade of the adjacent road if the sign location is lower than
the adjacent road.
Customized elements were created for this sign type, such as setback and duration, in
order to ensure signs are installed in locations that do not create safety hazards and can
remain on the property for a period of time that benefits the affected businesses.
The new sign type also includes a provision which allows the Planning and Zoning
Administrator and Town Engineer latitude to review and approve alternatives to the
proposed sign standards. Potential for a modification will allow the Town to recognize
unique situations that could occur with each road construction project and customize the
standards in accordance with details provided section 7.1 of Attachment 2.
All costs associated with purchasing and installing the signs are at the expense of the
property owner or business lessee. A sign permit fee will be paid by the applicant upon
submittal of the permit application according to the established fee schedule. Currently, the
permit fee is $50 .00 .
GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE
The Zoning Code Amendment was reviewed with the standards of the General Plan's Vision,
Goals and Policies. Listed below are relevant policies within the General P lan relating to signage
in italics , followed by staff commentary:
Sign age : Signage controls have to balance citizens concerns about the increasing level of
signage with the needs of businesses to attract customers.
Policy 2 .1.10: The Town sha/l create standards for signage to provide information and direction
to a/low businesses to attract and maintain customers with the least intrusive sign age possible.
Staff comment: The proposed sign type addition will allow additional signage for businesses
during a time when they may otherwise be unable to effectively utilize existing signage. Specific
standards were included in the new sign type to prevent an overconcentration of signs which
includes limits on duration, location, quantity and size of signs.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Planning and Zoning Commission take the following action:
Recommend approval to the Town Council of the proposed Zoning Code amendment to Section
28 .6 .B (Signs in a Commercial /Industrial Zoning District) to provide a special temporary sign
type for businesses during road construction.
OV714-008 Sign Code Amendment Page 4 of 4
Plann i ng and Zoning Commission Staff Report
SUGGESTED MOTIONS:
The Planning and Zon ing Commiss io n may wish to consider the follo wi ng suggested motion :
I move to recommend approval of the Zoning Code Amendment to Section 28.6.B to provide a
special sign type for commercial, religious institutions and multi-family properties during road
construction.
Or
I move to recommend denial of the Zoning Code Amendment to Section 28.6.B to provide a
special sign type for commercial, religious institutions and multi-family properties during road
construction, as the request does no t meet the finding that ___________ _
---_._"--_._._-_ .. __ ._ .. _---_ ... _---_ .. __ ... _----_._-------
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Site Photos
2. Proposed Code Amendment
3. Graph ic Illustrations
1
Photos showing how road construction can obscure visibility of business
Example of currently allowed 16 sq . ft. 4' tall banner
Site Photos
Sign Code Amendment(OV714-008)
Attachment 1
Attachment 2
Add new Sect ion 2B.6 .B.7 as fo ll ows:
7. Road Construct ion Sign
a) Definit ion: Temporary signage to enhance visibility of properties w ith commercial, mu lti-fam il y or
re li gious institu t ions duri ng road construction projects.
b) App licabi lity: Areas that wil l be d irect ly impacted by a road const r uction pro j ect as determined by the
Town Enginee r and Planning and Zon i ng Administrator.
c) Type:
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
Sign may be a banner or r igid mater ial such as wood, meta l o r sim il ar material.
Single or double faced.
Copy may be modified after issuance of permit within the paramete r s set forth in the code.
Any change in sign location will require a new permit.
Size of copy must be approved by the Town Eng ineer to assu r e safety.
d) Quantity:
i. One si gn for the comme r cial property per street frontage impacted by the road construction.
ii. If frontage is greater than 600 feet and there is more than 1 entrance to the deve l opment, a
second sign is pe r m itted .
iii. If fron t age is greater than BOO feet, one additional sign may be installed .
e) Area of Sign:
i. 32 square feet for a commercial property with 1 to 4 owners or bus iness lessees .
ii. 64 square feet for a commerc ial property with 5 or more owners or business lessees .
f) Height: 10'
g) Location: On p r ivate property w here the business is located.
h) Setback: None, un l ess additional ar ea is requ i red for uti lity or road work. Town Engineer must
determine if proposed location is safe and does not interfere with construct ion .
i) Illumination: None
j) Co lor: Lettering and background may be any color except f luorescent or iridescent.
k) Duration : Length of time the sign is permitted wi l l be determined by the Town Engineer and Planning
and Zoning Administrator and shall not exceed substantial completion of the road construction project.
I) The Town Eng i neer and Planning and Zoning Administrator shall be permitted to administrative ly
approv e modifications to road constru ction signage if each of the following cr iteria have been satisfied:
i. Th ere are unique circumstanc es due t o road de sign or construction.
ii. The proposed changes do not have a greater overall impact than the allowed sign type.
iii. The proposed changes are based on existing standards from an all owed sign type in the
Zoning Code.
Illustration of how a 32 sq ft, 10' tall banner might look
-
Photo of temporary
sign relief allowance
In u se.
64 sq ft, 10' ta ll
Examples of Proposed Sign Type
Sig n Co de A men d ment(OV7 14-008)
Attachment 3
October 21, 2014 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Special Session Page 1 of 5
MINUTES
ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
SPECIAL SESSION
AMENDED AGENDA
October 21, 2014
ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE
SPECIAL SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Cox called the October 21, 2014 session of the Oro Valley Planning and
Zoning Commission Special Session to order at 6:00 PM.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Don Cox, Chairman
John Buette, Vice-Chairman
Greg Hitt, Commissioner
Bill Leedy, Commissioner
Frank Pitts, Commissioner
Bill Rodman, Commissioner
Tom Drazazgowski, Commissioner
ALSO PRESENT: Joe Hornat, Council Member and Council Liaison
David Laws, Permitting Manager
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Chairman Cox led the Planning and Zoning Commission members and audience in the
Pledge of Allegiance.
CALL TO AUDIENCE -
Bill Adler, Oro Valley resident, expressed his concern with the confusion among citizens
on land use over General Plan Designations. Staff and the applicant’s need to start
using lot size as the reference because the applicant knows how this thing is going to
pencil out. Part of our job is education, which is communication with citizens and the
need to use one terminology rather than two or three.
COUNCIL LIAISON COMMENTS
Council Member Hornat had no updates to present this evening.
October 21, 2014 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Special Session Page 2 of 5
SPECIAL AGENDA
1. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST TO AMEND SECTION 27.10.D. OF THE
ZONING CODE TO ALLOW THE TOWN ENGINEER DISCRETION TO MODIFY
THE DRIVEWAY ACCESS REQUIREMENTS TO ENSURE SAFE DRIVING
CONDITIONS, OV714-006
Michael Spaeth, Senior Planner, presented the following:
- Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District
David Laws, Permitting Manager, presented the following:
- Tangerine Road Widening Project
- Driveway Separation Requirements
- What's the issue?
Michael Spaeth, concluded the presentation with the following:
- Proposed Code Amendment
- Discussion
Chairman Cox opened the public hearing.
There were no speaker requests.
Chairman Cox closed the public hearing.
MOTION: A motion was made by Commissioner Leedy and seconded by Commissioner
Hitt to recommend approval of the Zoning Code Amendment in Attachment 1 related to
the Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District, based on the finding that the request
would allow the Town Engineer to maintain safe driving conditions.
Attachment 1
Proposed Code Amendment
Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District Code Amendment
OV714-006
October 21, 2014, Planning and Zoning Commission
Section 27.10.D.3.f.vi.b
Tangerine Road
A tract of not less than twenty-five (25) feet in width for commercial developments
located at arterial intersections and fifty (50) feet in width for all other developments
October 21, 2014 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Special Session Page 3 of 5
shall be designated on all properties abutting Tangerine Road, measured from the right-
of-way. Crossing of the tract with roads, public or private, and driveways (except for
emergency vehicle access where required) is prohibited without the approval of ADOT
and the Town. and in no case shall such NO direct access crossing SHALL be less than
three hundred thirty (330) feet from an arterial intersection or less than one thousand
(1,000) feet from another vehicular tract crossing, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED
BY THE TOWN ENGINEER DUE TO SIGNIFICANT TRAFFIC SAFETY CONCERNS
SUPPORTED BY RECOGNIZED TRAFFIC SAFETY ENGINEERING STANDARDS.
MOTION carried, 7-0.
*2. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST TO AMEND SECTION 22.5 OF THE ZONING
CODE TO UPDATE THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVIEW CRITERIA AND
CONSIDERATION OF THE COORDINATION OF CUP AND REZONING PUBLIC
HEARINGS, OV714-007
Michael Spaeth, Senior Planner, presented the following:
- What is a Conditional Use Permit
- Existing CUP Evaluation Criteria
- Impact of a CUP
- Proposed Code Amendment
- Timing of Rezoning and CUP
- Discussion
Chairman Cox opened the public hearing.
Bill Adler, Oro Valley resident, commented that he has advocated to Town Council on
convenience uses and asked that this process be removed. There is no use in the table
of conditional and permitted uses that cannot be reviewed adequately during the
rezoning process. Staff has the skills and the talent to do this. Mr. Adler's suggestion
would be to deny this particular proposal and place it on a future agenda to discuss
doing away with conditional use permits.
Don Bristow, Oro Valley resident, expressed concern with words like reasonable. There
is a need for a definition beyond reasonable when we are making up our minds about
conditional use permits.
Dave Perry, Oro Valley resident, stated that this is deep water for him. Why do
conditional use permits need to take so long at the expense of the developer. Maybe
put some of the meetings together to reduce meetings. This is a good thing and maybe
figure out a way to do that. It's important for us as a community to make our processes
simpler, easier to follow, with less meeting times and less subjective. He encouraged
developing ways to change this process to accomplish these goals.
October 21, 2014 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Special Session Page 4 of 5
Chairman Cox closed the public hearing.
MOTION: A motion was made by Vice-Chairman Buette and seconded by Chairman
Cox to recommend denial of the Zoning Code Amendment in Attachment 3 related to
the Conditional Use Permit review criteria, as the request does not meet the finding that
the request would improve the effectiveness of and add specificity to the conditional use
permit review criteria.
Chairman Cox withdrew his 2nd.
Vice Chair Buette withdrew his motion.
MOTION: A motion was made by Vice-Chairman Buette and seconded by
Commissioner Rodman to continue the Zoning Code Amendment at a future date for
further discussion.
Bayer Vella, Planning Manager, requested direction to deliver what is needed.
- Some logical presentation on why we need conditional use permits
- Specificity
- Streamline this process
MOTION carried, 7-0.
3. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST TO AMEND SECTION 28.6.B OF THE ZONING
CODE TO ADD A NEW TEMPORARY SIGN TYPE FOR BUSINESSES IN
ROAD CONSTRUCTION ZONES, OV714-008
Patty Hayes, Senior Planning Technician, presented the following:
- Proposal
- Completed Road Improvement
- Road Construction in Progress
- Road Construction Impact
- Solution
- Proposed Sign Size Example
- Sign Relief Program
- Discussion
Chairman Cox opened the public hearing.
Don Bristow, Oro Valley resident, voiced his concern with signage directing people into
the business. Thought needs to be put into this and if nothing is going to be done to
help the driver, then the nice big sign isn't going to help a lot.
Bill Adler, Oro Valley resident, expressed his concern with the stipulation that the sign
be on private property as well as signs needing to be two way signs and portable. For
October 21, 2014 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Special Session Page 5 of 5
the advertising for the businesses themselves, they need to be on public property and
closer to the roadway to expedite the advertising purpose.
Dave Perry, Oro Valley resident, echoed the previous speaker’s comments and a
suggestion of black type on white background. Mr. Perry also agreed with Mr. Adler in
regards to getting the signs closer to the roads. His suggestion would be flexibility to
the staff in allowing different solutions for different projects.
Chairman Cox closed the public hearing.
Bayer Vella, Planning Manager, pointed out that on attachment 2, staff intended to
strike L4.
MOTION: A motion was made by Commissioner Rodman and seconded by
Commissioner Drazazgowski to recommend approval of the Zoning Code Amendment
to Section 28.6. B to provide a special sign type for commercial, religious institutions
and multi-family properties during road construction and deletion of L4 in attachment 2.
MOTION carried, 7-0.
PLANNING UPDATE (INFORMATIONAL ONLY)
Bayer Vella, Planning Manager, provide the following:
- Change to November 20th Special Planning and Zoning Commission meeting
- Vice Chair Buette and Chairman Cox term out December 31st
- Recruitment for the above two vacant seats
- Upcoming three neighborhood meetings
ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: A motion was made by Commissioner Leedy and seconded by Commissioner
Rodman to adjourn the October 21, 2014, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting at
7:46 PM.
MOTION carried, 7-0.
Chairwoman
Cathy Workman
Workman Insurance
and Investments
Chair-elect
Alan Dankwerth
Market Considerations
Secretary
Marcia Ring
Tohono Chul Park
Treasurer
EI Ndoye
National Bank of Arizona
Past chair
Sarah Ritchie
Pitcher of Nectar
Distributing
Oct. 21,2014
7435 N . Oracle Rd., Suite 107
Oro Valley, AZ 85704
P: 520.297.2191
F: 520.742.7960
orovalleychamber.com
Members of the Oro Valley Planning and Zoning Commission
Town staff
Ladies and gentlemen,
The Greater Oro Valley Chamber of Commerce supports Sign
Code Amendment OV714-008, adding a sign type, road
construction signs.
The proposal recognizes that businesses need help with signage
during road construction -they do. Anecdotally, business people
tell us road construction can cost them dozens, and even hundreds,
of customers a day.
The proposal creates a I-time, staff-level approval process for
the duration of a road project. No council permission would be
required. Oro Valley can be quick to respond, with established
guidelines , when roads are being built. We hope government will
notify businesses up-front, before a proj ect begins , of their
signage options.
We encourage your support ofthis zoning code amendment.
Thank you.
Dave
Dave P erry
President / CEO
Greater Oro Valley Chamber of Commerce
297-2191
Dave@orovalleychamber.com
Attachment 4
Town Council Regular Session Item # 3. a.
Meeting Date:11/19/2014
Requested by: Bayer Vella
Submitted By:Michael Spaeth, Development Infrastructure Services
Department:Development Infrastructure Services
Information
SUBJECT:
RESOLUTION NO. (R)14-58, DECLARING THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE ORO VALLEY
ZONING CODE SECTION 27.10.D.3, TANGERINE ROAD CORRIDOR OVERLAY DISTRICT,
PROVIDED AS EXHIBIT "A" WITHIN THE ATTACHED RESOLUTION AND FILED WITH THE TOWN
CLERK, A PUBLIC RECORD
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
This is a procedural item to declare the draft ordinance a matter of public record. The draft ordinance has
been posted online and made available in the Town Clerk's office. If the final version is adopted, as
approved by Town Council, it will be made available in the same manner.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
Once adopted by Town Council, this proposed resolution will become a public record and will save the
Town on advertising costs since the Town will forgo publishing the entire draft ordinance in print form.
The current draft version of the draft ordinance has been posted on the Town's website and a printed
copy is available for public review in the Town Clerk's office. If the final version is adopted, it will be
published on the Town's website.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The Town will save on advertising costs by meeting publishing requirements by reference, without
including the pages of amendments.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to (adopt or deny) Resolution No. (R)14-58, declaring the proposed amendment to the Oro
Valley Zoning Code Section 27.10.D.3, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and filed with the Town Clerk, a
public record.
Attachments
(R)14-58 Amending Section 27.10.D.3
C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 6\@BCL@6413233F\@BCL@6413233F.doc Town of Oro Valley Attorney’s Office/ca/072612
RESOLUTION NO. (R)14-58
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, DECLARING AS A
PUBLIC RECORD THAT CERTAIN DOCUMENT TO BE
PLACED WITHIN CHAPTER 27, GENERAL DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS, ARTICLE, 27.10 ENVIRONMENTALLY
SENSITIVE LANDS, SECTION 27.10.D.3.f.vi.b.4.A.1
TANGERINE ROAD, OF THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE
REVISED AND ENTITLED THE “REQUIREMENTS SUBJECT
TO MODIFICATION”; ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT “A”
AND FILED WITH THE TOWN CLERK
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO
VALLEY, ARIZONA, that certain document of the Oro Valley Town Code, entitled
Chapter 27, “General Development Standards”, Section 27.10.D.3.f.vi.b.4.A.1,
“Tangerine Road” is attached hereto as Exhibit “A”, three copies of which are on file in
the Office of the Town Clerk, is hereby declared to be a public record, and said copies are
ordered to remain on file with the Town Clerk.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley,
Arizona this 19
th day of November, 2014.
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
Dr. Satish I. Hiremath, Mayor
ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie K. Bower, Town Clerk Tobin Sidles, Legal Services Director
Date: Date:
C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 6\@BCL@6413233F\@BCL@6413233F.doc Town of Oro Valley Attorney’s Office/ca/072612
EXHIBIT “A”
Proposed Code Amendment
Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District Code Amendment
OV714-006
November 19, 2014, Town Council
Section 27.10.D.3.f.vi.b
Tangerine Road
A tract of not less than twenty-five (25) feet in width for commercial developments
located at arterial intersections and fifty (50) feet in width for all other developments
shall be designated on all properties abutting Tangerine Road, measured from the right-
of-way. Crossing of the tract with roads, public or private, and driveways (except for
emergency vehicle access where required) is prohibited without the approval of ADOT
and the Town. and in no case shall such NO direct access crossing SHALL be less than
three hundred thirty (330) feet from an arterial intersection or less than one thousand
(1,000) feet from another vehicular tract crossing, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED
BY THE TOWN ENGINEER DUE TO SIGNIFICANT TRAFFIC SAFETY CONCERNS
SUPPORTED BY RECOGNIZED TRAFFIC SAFETY ENGINEERING STANDARDS.
Town Council Regular Session Item # 3. b.
Meeting Date:11/19/2014
Requested by: Bayer Vella
Submitted By:Michael Spaeth, Development Infrastructure Services
Department:Development Infrastructure Services
Information
SUBJECT:
PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE NO. (O)14-15, AMENDING SECTION 27.10.D.3 OF THE ZONING
CODE, TANGERINE ROAD CORRIDOR OVERLAY DISTRICT, TO PROVIDE THE TOWN ENGINEER
THE DISCRETION TO REDUCE DRIVEWAY ACCESS SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the code amendment as provided in the
attached ordinance.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District was adopted in 1997 and was intended to preserve the
scenic value of the Tangerine Road Corridor, as well as to limit access to the roadway which would
maintain efficient traffic flow. In some rare cases, the driveway access separation requirements could
inadvertently result in less than optimum safety conditions, particularly at street intersections.
A recent variance application illuminated the need for discretion in applying the driveway access
separation requirements. The Board of Adjustment requested that staff explore a Zoning Code
amendment to allow for the Town Engineer to have discretion in modifying the driveway access
separation requirements, where conformance may cause safety concerns. The Planning and Zoning
Commission initiated the code amendment on September 2, 2014, and recommended approval on
October 21, 2014.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
The Town adopted the Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District in 1997 with two primary purposes: The
first was to preserve the scenic value along the roadway and the second was to ensure safety and
efficient traffic movement throughout the corridor. Safe and efficient traffic movement is maintained
through access limitations known as driveway access separation requirements, summarized as follows:
Driveways must be at least 330 feet from an arterial street intersection (i.e. Tangerine Road and La
Cholla Boulevard).
Driveways must be at least 1,000 feet from another driveway or street.
The intent is to limit direct access onto Tangerine Road to ensure efficient traffic flow. A high number of
driveways or street intersections along a road results in more congestion and an inability to maintain
reasonable speeds. Therefore, limiting driveway access is very important to maintaining Tangerine
Road’s function as a primary arterial roadway in this area.
In rare cases, strict conformance with the separation requirements may force a driveway to be located
within the functional limits of an arterial street intersection, causing unintended safety conflicts. A recent
Board of Adjustment case illuminated the need for Town Engineer discretion with regard to driveway
spacing requirements. The Board of Adjustment voted unanimously to approve the requested variance
and requested staff to explore a Zoning Code amendment allowing the Town Engineer discretion in
applying the driveway access separation requirements. The Planning and Zoning Commission initiated
the amendment on September 2, 2014. Further information on the variance case is provided in the
attached Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report (Attachment 2).
Proposed Code Amendment
The proposed Code Amendment provides the Town Engineer the discretion to modify driveway
separation requirements solely when significant traffic safety concerns exist. Any modifications will be
based upon established and recognized engineering standards and principles.
General Plan Conformance
The Zoning Code Amendment was reviewed for conformance with the Vision, Goals and Policies of the
General Plan. Listed below is a summary of the applicable Goals and Policies in italics, followed by staff
commentary:
To ensure the safe, convenient and efficient vehicular and non-motorized traffic circulation to serve
both within and through the community (Goal 5.1).
The Town shall continue to identify and correct existing and potential traffic hazards (Policy 5.1.3).
Town Engineer discretion to address unsafe traffic conditions is consistent with this General Plan Goal
and Policy.
Planning and Zoning Commission Review
The proposed Code Amendment was heard by the Planning and Zoning Commission on October 21,
2014. The primary topics discussed during the meeting included traffic safety, engineering standards and
requirements for modification. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the
proposed code amendment. The Planning and Zoning Commission hearing draft minutes are provided
as Attachment 3.
Public Notification Process
Public Notice has been provided as follows:
All HOA's in the Town have been notified of this hearing
Public Hearing notice was posted:
In the Territorial newspaper
At Town Hall
On the Town website
To date, staff has not received any comments concerning the proposed amendment.
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to APPROVE Ordinance No. (O)14-15, an amendment to Section 27.10.D.3 of the Zoning Code,
to provide Town Engineer discretion to reduce driveway access separation requirements as necessary to
maintain safe traffic conditions.
OR
I MOVE to DENY Ordinance No. (O)14-15, an amendment to Section 27.10.D.3 of the Zoning Code,
related to the Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District, finding that ____________________________.
Attachments
(O)14-15 Amending Section 27.10.D.3
ATTACHMENT 2 - PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
ATTACHMENT 3 - DRAFT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES
ORDINANCE NO. (O)14-15
AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA,
AMENDING CHAPTER 27, GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS,
ARTICLE, 27.10 ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE LANDS, SECTION
27.10.D.3.f.vi.b.4.A.1 TANGERINE ROAD, OF THE ORO VALLEY
ZONING CODE REVISED; REPEALING ALL RESOLUTIONS,
ORDINANCES AND RULES OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY IN
CONFLICT THEREWITH; PRESERVING THE RIGHTS AND DUTIES
THAT HAVE ALREADY MATURED AND PROCEEDINGS THAT HAVE
ALREADY BEGUN THEREUNDER
WHEREAS, on March 13, 1981, the Mayor and Council approved Ordinance (O)81-58, which
adopted that certain document entitled “Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised (OVZCR); and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to revise Chapter 27, General Development Standards, Section
27.10.D.3.f.vi.b.4.A.1, Tangerine Road, to enable the Town Engineer discretion in cases where
driveway separation standards may have the potential to create significant traffic safety concerns;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a meeting on October 21, 2014, and
voted to recommend approval of amending Chapter 27, General Development Standards, Section
27.10.D.3.f.vi.b.4.A.1, Tangerine Road; and
WHEREAS,the Mayor and Council have considered the proposed amendments to Chapter 27,
General Development Standards, Section 27.10.D.3.f.vi.b.4.A.1, Tangerine and finds that they
are consistent with the Town's General Plan and other Town ordinances and are in the best interest
of the Town.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of
Oro Valley that:
SECTION 1.that certain document entitled Chapter 27, General Development Standards,
Section 27.10.D.3.f.vi.b.4.A.1, Tangerine Road, of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised,
attached hereto as Exhibit “A”, to enable the Town Engineer discretion in cases where driveway
separation standards may have the potential to create significant traffic safety concerns is hereby
approved.
SECTION 2.All Oro Valley ordinances, resolutions or motions and parts of ordinances,
resolutions or motions of the Council in conflict with the provision of this Ordinance are hereby
repealed.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this
19th day of November, 2014.
2
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
Dr. Satish I. Hiremath, Mayor
ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie K. Bower, Town Clerk Tobin Sidles, Legal Services Director
Date: Date:
3
Exhibit “A”
Proposed Code Amendment
Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District Code Amendment
OV714-006
November 19, 2014, Town Council
Section 27.10.D.3.f.vi.b
Tangerine Road
A tract of not less than twenty-five (25) feet in width for commercial developments located at
arterial intersections and fifty (50) feet in width for all other developments shall be designated
on all properties abutting Tangerine Road, measured from the right-of-way. Crossing of the
tract with roads, public or private, and driveways (except for emergency vehicle access where
required) is prohibited without the approval of ADOT and the Town. and in no case shall such
NO direct access crossing SHALL be less than three hundred thirty (330) feet from an arterial
intersection or less than one thousand (1,000) feet from another vehicular tract crossing,
UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE TOWN ENGINEER DUE TO SIGNIFICANT
TRAFFIC SAFETY CONCERNS SUPPORTED BY RECOGNIZED TRAFFIC SAFETY
ENGINEERING STANDARDS.
Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District Code Amendment
Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report
CASE NUMBER: OV714-006
MEETING DATE: October 21, 2014
AGENDA ITEM: 1
STAFF CONTACT: Michael Spaeth, Senior Planner
mspaeth@orovalleyaz.gov (520) 229-4812
Request: Zoning Code Amendment to the Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District
to provide the Town Engineer the discretion to reduce driveway access
separation requirements.
Recommendation: Recommend approval
SUMMARY:
The Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District was adopted in 1997 and was intended to
preserve the scenic value along the roadway and to limit access to maintain efficient traffic
flow. In some rare cases, the driveway access separation requirements could inadvertently
result in less than optimum safety conditions, particularly at street intersections.
A recent variance application illuminated the need for discretion in applying the driveway
access separation requirements. Based on this variance case, on September 2, 2014, the
Planning and Zoning Commission initiated a Zoning Code amendment to consider allowing for
Town Engineer discretion to modify the driveway access separation requirements, when
conformance may cause safety concerns. The proposed amendment adds language to allow
the Town Engineer this discretion when significant traffic safety concerns exist in keeping with
recognized traffic safety engineering standards.
BACKGROUND:
Related Approvals
In July, 2014, the Board of Adjustment approved a variance to the Tangerine Road
Corridor Overlay District 1000’ driveway access separation requirement for the Mercado
Mandarina commercial development proposed at the northeast corner of Tangerine Road
and La Cholla Boulevard.
On September 2, 2014, the Planning and Zoning Commission initiated this Zoning Code
Amendment.
TRCOD Code Amendment Page 2 of 5
Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report
Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District
The purpose of the Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District is to preserve the scenic value
along the roadway and to ensure safety and efficient traffic movement through access
limitations. The driveway access separation requirements are summarized as follows:
• Driveways must be at least 330’ feet from an arterial street
intersection (i.e. Tangerine Rd. and La Cholla Blvd.)
• Driveways must be at least 1,000 feet from another driveway or
street
The intent is to limit direct access onto Tangerine Road to preserve the character of the
corridor and ensure efficient traffic flow. A high number of driveways or street intersections with
a road results in more congestion and an inability to maintain reasonable speeds. In sum,
limiting driveway access is very important to maintaining Tangerine Road’s function as a
primary arterial roadway in this area.
However, in rare cases, strict conformance with the separation requirements, a driveway may
be forced to be located within the functional limits of an arterial street intersection, causing
unintended safety conflicts. This is exactly what occurred in the case of the Mercado
Mandarina development.
DISCUSSION / ANALYSIS:
Zoning Code Amendment Analysis
The proposed amendment (Attachment 1) will enable the Town Engineer flexibility in limited
cases where the driveway separation standards have the potential to create significant traffic
safety concerns. The discretion to modify the separation requirements will be based on the
existence of significant traffic safety concerns or where in conflict with recognized traffic safety
engineering standards. Examples of areas of conflict may include, among others, a road forced
into the functional limits of an intersection.
Town Engineer discretion to modify the driveway separation requirements is recommended
over the traditional variance process. The Zoning Code requires conformance with 5 criteria
when considering a variance application that are more related to the nature and characteristics
of a property, as opposed to safety considerations related to a roadway.
General Plan Conformance
The Zoning Code Amendment was reviewed for conformance with the Vision, Goals and
Policies of the General Plan. Listed below is a summary of the applicable Goals and
Policies in italics, followed by staff commentary:
TRCOD Code Amendment Page 3 of 5
Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report
Goal 5.1 To ensure the safe, convenient and efficient vehicular and non-
motorized traffic circulation to serve both within and through the
community.
Policy 5.1.3 The Town shall continue to identify and correct existing and potential
traffic hazards.
Staff Comment
The driveway separation requirements may, in rare cases, inadvertently create traffic
significant safety issues or require a driveway to be located in conflict with recognized
traffic safety engineering standards. Town Engineer discretion to modify the separation
requirements to eliminate the potential for creating unsafe traffic conditions is consistent
with this General Plan Goal and Policy.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION:
Public notice has been provided as follows:
• All HOAs in the Town were notified of this hearing
• Public hearing notice was posted:
o In the Territorial newspaper
o At Town hall
o On the Town website
No comments have been received to date.
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the following findings:
• The proposed amendment would allow the flexibility to eliminate potential significant
traffic safety concerns and eliminate requirements in conflict with recognized traffic
safety engineering standards.
• The proposal is consistent with the relevant Goals and Policies of the General
Plan.
• The Board of Adjustment variance process is not well suited for resolving
traffic safety issues involving public roads.
It is recommended that the Planning and Zoning Commission take the following action:
Recommend approval to the Town Council of the requested Zoning Code Amendment
OV714-006
TRCOD Code Amendment Page 4 of 5
Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report
SUGGESTED MOTIONS:
The Planning and Zoning Commission may wish to consider the following suggested motion:
I move to recommend approval of the Zoning Code Amendment in Attachment 1 related to the
Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District, based on the finding that the request would allow
the Town Engineer to maintain safe driving conditions.
OR
I move to recommend denial of the Zoning Code Amendment in Attachment 1 related to the
Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District, as the request does not meet the finding that
__________________________________.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Proposed Code Amendment
___________________________________________
Bayer Vella, Interim Planning Manager
Attachment 1
Proposed Code Amendment
Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District Code Amendment
OV714-006
October 21, 2014, Planning and Zoning Commission
Section 27.10.D.3.f.vi.b
Tangerine Road
A tract of not less than twenty-five (25) feet in width for commercial developments located
at arterial intersections and fifty (50) feet in width for all other developments shall be
designated on all properties abutting Tangerine Road, measured from the right-of-way.
Crossing of the tract with roads, public or private, and driveways (except for emergency
vehicle access where required) is prohibited without the approval of ADOT and the Town.
and in no case shall such NO direct access crossing SHALL be less than three hundred
thirty (330) feet from an arterial intersection or less than one thousand (1,000) feet from
another vehicular tract crossing, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE TOWN
ENGINEER DUE TO SIGNIFICANT TRAFFIC SAFETY CONCERNS SUPPORTED BY
RECOGNIZED TRAFFIC SAFETY ENGINEERING STANDARDS.
October 21, 2014 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Special Session Page 1 of 2
MINUTES
ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
SPECIAL SESSION
AMENDED AGENDA
October 21, 2014
ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE
1.PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST TO AMEND SECTION 27.10.D. OF THE
ZONING CODE TO ALLOW THE TOWN ENGINEER DISCRETION TO MODIFY
THE DRIVEWAY ACCESS REQUIREMENTS TO ENSURE SAFE DRIVING
CONDITIONS, OV714-006
Michael Spaeth, Senior Planner, presented the following:
- Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District
David Laws, Permitting Manager, presented the following:
- Tangerine Road Widening Project
- Driveway Separation Requirements
- What's the issue?
Michael Spaeth, concluded the presentation with the following:
- Proposed Code Amendment
- Discussion
Chairman Cox opened the public hearing.
There were no speaker requests.
Chairman Cox closed the public hearing.
MOTION:A motion was made by Commissioner Leedy and seconded by Commissioner
Hitt to recommend approval of the Zoning Code Amendment in Attachment 1 related to
the Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District, based on the finding that the request
would allow the Town Engineer to maintain safe driving conditions.
Attachment 1
Proposed Code Amendment
Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District Code Amendment
OV714-006
October 21, 2014, Planning and Zoning Commission
October 21, 2014 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Special Session Page 2 of 2
Section 27.10.D.3.f.vi.b
Tangerine Road
A tract of not less than twenty-five (25) feet in width for commercial developments
located at arterial intersections and fifty (50) feet in width for all other developments
shall be designated on all properties abutting Tangerine Road, measured from the right-
of-way. Crossing of the tract with roads, public or private, and driveways (except for
emergency vehicle access where required) is prohibited without the approval of ADOT
and the Town. and in no case shall such NO direct access crossing SHALL be less than
three hundred thirty (330) feet from an arterial intersection or less than one thousand
(1,000) feet from another vehicular tract crossing, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED
BY THE TOWN ENGINEER DUE TO SIGNIFICANT TRAFFIC SAFETY CONCERNS
SUPPORTED BY RECOGNIZED TRAFFIC SAFETY ENGINEERING STANDARDS.
MOTION carried, 7-0.
ADJOURNMENT
MOTION:A motion was made by Commissioner Leedy and seconded by Commissioner
Rodman to adjourn the October 21, 2014, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting at
7:46 PM.
MOTION carried, 7-0.