Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOV120006 Dct"05 00 02: Sop p. 3 •APR-G-1900 17.42 > 240)-t t Aki e _ ° TOWN OF QRO VALLEY t COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT '` • Quitairto 5. • pairs erd Recr aeon i A. •Mannino and Taring • Trap-it csz A - ' A, A _---_ -4 Manias and Zonis;Division Aa�vN OEQ�9IN • i i.i`niv N.LACan*d..1 Drive.Oro tiatttti AZ/ 7 Plum:(Su 19.9997 fat.ta.3ta3 742-102' jY t4 5itt A imw.ti-oro-raftg-r.us REQUEST FOR PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: New 3 bay fire station with on site living tacil.:;.ties . L ATION: Itt Rancho Vistoso on Wocdhtirne Ave . off of Rancho Vistoso Blvd . PARCEL NUMBER 7 i CIRCLE TYPE OF REQUEST; REZONING P,RELIIWINARY PLALOPMENT PLAN U PERMIT APPLICANT NAME/FIRM: Hunt & Caraway Architects ADDRESS: 7145 N. 57th ODri•:e, G elendal AZ 85301 • TELEPHONE NO.: FAX 623-934-4501 huntcara@p.�inene t . cc��� SAX NO. EMAIL PROPERTY'OWNER: CGIde1 eazurF Fi -e T) r ri rt_ PREAPPLICATION CONFER NCE DA T EITIME REQUESTED: 1 9/4 9 SIGNATURE: — - - _ DATA • PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCES ARE HELD EVERY FRIDAY MORNING. -. SUBMITTALS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT LEAST FIVE (5) WORKING DAYS IN ADVANCE OF THE DESIRED PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE DATE. ▪ SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS EIGHT COPIES OF THE PROJECT CONCEPT PLAN,WITH LOCATION MAP. ONE COPY OF SITE RESOURCE INVENTORY PER SEC.14-104 OF OVZCR. 'N �.' .?ar# cfflatsy , p 2(1121 Post-le FaX NOFV 767 irael 1•j o� ITO -Ica �C.iLzt F��tt v t t. r.S Co Mart_ � 5 ;7"*".e4 �`q . 19 ' .EY AHi�O TOWN OF ORO vALLEY ,cpVNpEp�9�d• PLANNING DIVISION APPLICATION FORM APPLICATION TYPE: N ?'MN FILE NUMBER: CJ11II"OQ"aD FEB 2000 A. Name. PROJECT ROPONENT' �DEVELOP i . 2. Firm i ff;;e- .,/, 3. Address 3' 7T— City oe.e 4. State & Zip Code 73 5. Telephone ''S c) d.z -7t«/ B. PROPERTY OWNER(S : ,t F MORE THAN ONE OWNER ATTACH LIST 1. Name t o- " s a MOr4/ 2. Address r_A F A City "7Z,— 3. State & Zip.Code f33Z. :7 Z. 4 4. Telephone ( ri ) 62/--. L9OC) C. SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1. Tax Code Number 2. Legal Description/Property Address r?1 ow 'F ccei4L -C 36, 3. Area of Property 4�9.4e- 4. Zoning Existing 4/i O C=� % P oposed _i/�'.4Z C-/ 5.. General. Plan Designa ion C 1 6. Land Use Existing GD1J7 Proposed rim.. D. PREVIOUS APPLICATIONS RELATING TO THIS PROPERTY: OV9- OV9- OV12- 0V12- OV - OV - E. REASON FOR REQUEST: _ ‘454 e//.h :1 r�� 6 , L cJ , tom _ 2or�isiru ,,.:..:::a;>�.:.:::;;:c .::::...:.>:>.>::s>.::�>:�:>�>;;.;;:>::.:::.::::r::r:;•>::<:cx;;:;.:.;:.:.s:::�.:>:.>:or.:�.:;;.;�:.>:o;::.;:a.�.:.>;;.:;;;;::..>:::.:�::r:»>:•.::�>:�:.>;>:>:.»;>:.::...;::;•:o;;:<c;;:.;>:»>;.::.;.:..::::::<:::;a;.:::.:�y.::::::;;:;:..,;:::::.:.>�:::.....::.. TI : 00040 104#:<rs8true. a0.d eorreot tQ the Pest pf my J .owledge. am the 4 * o thab ov ; e. e de.se bed;p operty or have been uthc r .zed by e owrie to make t is....a?: l*cation D V Si ature of applicant 04, ,%,1 0 f,,44!3 rev-k.,'+- / i v: '+mow lown or Oro Valley 520 742 1022 P . 01 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS NO DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL WILL BE ACCEPTED UNTIL THE APPLICANT HAS SCHEDULED AND COMPLLIED A PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE WITH PLANNING AND ENGINEERING STAFF MEMBERS. All development plan submittals must include the following materials to be accepted for processing: ,1/ A completed application form. r/ 24 copies of the development plan, Pima County fold. _I/ 1 copy of boundary closure calculations with coordinate reference to identifiable points. r1 copy of the slope analysis. i/ I copy of average cross-slope calculations. 17.- 2 copies of the title report, current to within 30 days. 2 copies of preliminary CC&Rs, if aPPlicable./AS'T% _ �iE SA `L- //7V L 2 copies of hydrology report (see note on page 3) V1 copy of geotechnical soils report. ./ I/ 2 copies of traffic impact analysis (letter from ADOT required if adjacent to Oracle Road) Aerial photograph (1" = �¢J 200') w„,,,, .� ,mil ____ � � �/iits V3 full-sized blueline copies of native plant salvage, landscape, irrigation and buffer yard plans. 1 copy of PAD or PRD document, if applicable aV n-i44- J✓,/ic.��✓ /VA 1 data diskette (3.5 or 5.25 inch) containing parcel lines / If subject property is located in the Oracle Road Scenic Corridor Overlay District, the submittal must include 3 copies of a viewshed analysis, and must address the requirements of Article 10-4. Applicable submittal fees: C O pp `�%�p for development plan,�-���- 'for landscape & other improvement plans. f( 8i -) PROJECT NAME: ASSIGNED CASE NO: DATE SUBMITTED: REVIEWED AND ACCEPTED BY: t-eo-u4-y i 1 O:45A Lawn of Oro Va 1 ley 520 742 1022 P _02 ALL DEVELOPMENT PLANS MUST INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: A. /General Instructions i, I. The development plan must be drawn to a scale at which all necessary details are clearly shown (one inch equals 40 feet) on sheets measuring 24" x 36". Scale to be the same for all sheets. Larger sheet size or smaller scale must be approved by Town Engineer and Planning and Zoning Director. 2. Show North arrow. Every effort should be made to have North oriented toward th e top of the sheet. Some V slight rotation may be made to accommodate long narrow parcels, convenient match lines, etc.. but in no case will the North arrow point downward. (In the case of multiple sheets, the North orientation will be the same on all sheets). 3. In the upper right corner of the first sheet, provide a location map, drawn to a scale of 3 inches equals one mile, with North oriented to the top of the sheet. This location map shall include: a.b. c. d. The subject property, identified and centered within a one square mile area. The adjacent conditions; subdivisions, unsubdivided land, schools, existing zoning, etc. Major streets, rivers, railroads, nations forests, reservations, and city, town or other jurisdictional limits. The section. township and range of the subject plat. e. Labeled section corners. --1,-;/// f. A North arrow and scale indicated. 4. In the lower right corner of each sheet, provide a Title Block which includes: a. Name of subdivision. b. "Lots through and Common Areas A through " c. Brief legal description, i.e. "Portion of Section , T_ S, R E, G&SRB&M, Town of Oro Valley, Pima County, Arizona d. Scale. e. Contour interval. f. Date (revised plats should show date of revision). g. Town of Oro Valley case number. 5. Development plans must be consistent with the zoningrequirements set forth in the Oro ValleyZoning q t g Code Revised and/or the specific adopted Planned Area Development requirements. 6. Uses of all proposed areas must be identified. 7. Utilityeasementsprovided, where necessary, across ary, oss lots or along rear or side lot lines shall conform to the respective utility company policies. V8. Town limits must be shown where applicable. l r Cv-v-r- i 1 V= .+ H 1 own or Vr-o va i ley 520 742 1022 P.03 • ✓ 9. When the zoning ordinance involves the dedication of a public or private park , the Town Council must review and determine accessibility of same. V10. Cover sheet to show owner's and/or developer's name, address and phone number. V-- 11. Each sheet to bear the seal and signature Q ature of the registered professional engineer who prepared the plat, with the firm name, address and phone number shown on the cover sheet. 12. Approvaldevelopment of the development plan shall be effective for two years, but may be extended upon reapplication Z-- and review by the staff and Council. B. General Notes IZ 1. Gross area of development in acres and net building area. 2. Existing zoning. • 3. Building square footage. 4. Approximate area in parks, drainageways, natural open space and for any other proposed non-residential uses where applicable. 5. Amount of parking required, location, size and use of commercial pads. 6. When special zoning options apply, all pertinent calculations must appear: lot sizes, area of open space, drainageways, parking area calculations, hillside development zone slopes, yards and setbacks, buffers, area volume ratio, building heights, screening, etc. 7. Basis of bearings, including origin bearing. 8. Elevation datum, including identification and elevation of bench mark used. 9. "Developer will covenant to hold Town of Oro Valley, its successors and assigns, harmless in the event of flooding." 10. "Drainage will not be altered, disturbed or obstructed without the approval of the Oro Valley Town Council." 11. If drainageways are to be constructed, state that they will be constructed according to approved plans prior to the issuance of any permits from the Town Engineer and/or Building Official for parcels affected: These parcels to be identified either by number in note, or by outline on the development plan. 12. If lots are to be sold within a commercial subdivision: "Property's Association will be formed to accept responsibility for maintenance, control, safety and liability of private drainageways, drainage easements and common areas". 13. Access across flood prone areas to building sites will be approved by the Town Engineer and shall be the responsibility of the developer." 14. "Development plans will be submitted for commercial lots or pads prior to the issuance of any permits by the Town Engineer and/or Building Official." I 15. Include any notes required by the various affected agencies/utilities. 2' Feb-04-97 10: 46A Town of Oro Valley 520 742 1022 P . 04 Z- 16. Indicate the design speed and design vehicle to be used in street design and P g g parking lot calculations. ,/ 17. Approved improvement plans and approved assurances will be required prior to issuance of grading permits. C. Drainage NOTE: A complete hydraulic and hydrologic drainage report. prepared by a professional engineer, must be submitted and approved prior to approval of the development plan. The scope and detail of this report will be commensurate with the complexity of the drainage involved. I. All pertinent drainage information must be shown on the development plan, that is: 7 a. For each drainage course entering or leaving the site, the 100 year frequency flow must be shown for pre and post-development. b. For each drainage course for which the 100 year frequency flood equals or exceed 50 cubic feet per second at the point of entering and leaving the site, the limits of the 100 year flood-prone area must be shown an labeled. c. Any encroachment into the 10U year floodplain limits must be in conformance with the most current Oro Valley Floodplain Management Ordinance. d. For internal drainage carried in the streets, flow arrows with Q values sufficient to show drainage pattern, and 100-frequency flows at points of discharge, must be shown. 1 2. All developments must be provided with at least one means of all-weather ingress and egress; that is . depth of flow at driveway crossing must not exceed 6" for the 100 year flood frequency. 3. Parking areas shall not be used as retention basins. 4. Drainage structures shall be constructed and installed according to Town standards and paid for by the developer. All drainage structures must be designed to handle a Q 100 flow. 5. Drainageways shall not be designed to discharge onto paved streets, and/or parking areas. 6. Drainageways shall be provided where necessary to carry drainage flows through or from the development and such drainageways shall be dedicated and maintained by property owners except where crossing under public streets. 7. Drainage must be collected and released from a proposed development at the locations and in the manner indicated by the original topography. 8. If drainage is to be disturbed outside the boundaries of the development, arrangements must be made with adjacent owners and documentation submitted. 9. Channel capacity calculations: a. Shall conform to accepted Pima County methods. b. Constructed channels shall he sized and provided with necessary bank protection, velocity checks, etc., to prevent erosion and to minimize maintenance. r 3 Feb-04-97 10_ 46A Town of Oro Valley . 20 7,42 =V22 ? . 06 X0. Drainage channels with a bottom width of less than 20 feet must have a 10 foot (min.) access and utility Y easement on one side (both sides, if wider than 20 feed. • 1 1. Drainage channel side slopes shall he 3 to 1 or flatter when constructed in erodible material. Bank Iprotection shall be required in accordance with Pima County Drainage and Channel Design Manual. 12. Drainage channels cannot run adjacent to roadways. 13. No building site in a development will be located within the 100 year flood limits of a wash. 14. Utility easements which must necessarily cross the 100 year flood limits should cross flood limits as nearly at right angles as possible. Sewers may be so located when approved by the Pima County Wastewater Management. Utility easements within the 100 year flood limits (other than crossing) will be evaluated on a case by case basis. 15. Where proposed a development lies adjacent to watercourses or drainageways, and building sites are less than or equal to 100 year water surface elevation plus 1 foot, finished floor elevations must be shown and building envelopes indicated for each lot. Finished floor elevations shall be a minimum of I foot above the nearest adjacent 100 year use or 100 year water surface elevation. D. ditional Requirements i' 1. Topography - show existing contours at I foot intervals labeled frequently: 2 foot or 5 foot contour intervals may be used in special cases. Extend contours 100 feet outside the property line. • 2. Show boundary lines, bearings and distances with at least two ties to section corners or quarter corners. 3. Clearly indicate existing and proposed easements on and adjacent to the tract with their dimensions and purpose; giving recording data of existing easements. 4. Show existing and proposed streets on and adjacent to the tract with their names and right-of-way width. Give recording data of existing streets; show typical section for proposed streets. 5. Indicate existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the tract, showing size and materials of piping. - 6. Other conditions on the tract: watercourses, houses. barns, shacks. fences, walls, wells, tanks, irrigation - laterals and other significant features must be shown on the development plan. 7. Other conditions adjacent to the tract affecting design of the subdivision; subdivision names, book and page and date of adjoining plats; unsubdivided adjacent areas labeled as such and zoning designations. 8. Show proposed lot layout with approximate dimensions. Indicate typical and minimum lot sizes. 9. Show proposed new grades, elevations and slopes. Indicate proposed drainage patterns by flow arrows. 10. Legend of symbols. E. Proposed Utility Requirements i, ' 1. It is the responsibility of the developer to furnish the County Health Department and/or Pima County Wastewater Management such evidence as those departments may require to its satisfaction as to design and operation of sanitary sewage facilities proposed. A statement as to the type of facilities proposed shall appear on the development plan. 4 ro-04-9 10 : 46A Town of Oro Valley 520 742 1022 P . 06 e/ 2. The development plan shall not be approved unless accompanied by a Certificate of Assured Water Supply issued by the Director of Water Resources unless the development is located within an area designated as having an assured water supply by the Director of Water Resources pursuant to ARS 45-576, Subsection D or E. The Town Council shall note on the face of the development plan that a Certificate of Assured Water Supply has been submitted with the plan or that the proposed development is within such area pursuant to ARS 45-576 D or E. V3. Preliminary calculations and layout of proposed system and location of storm water disposal subject to approval of the Town Engineer. As to fire protection, the developer shall show evidence of compliance with the Town Fire Code including, but not limited to, location of tire hydrants, pipe sizing and storage. Rev. 5/96 5 , ./...: ' , I",,/At• ., . t' i • 4i‘Aqi 4 ' li '' ' kie1,4:::. k , ,„,.•-‘,...... , . "0*- ...,.... j!..' .,OF 1.7.7, I _i ,,,.,.... , ...„ , .. , . ...,. ,.. , ,. . . . • - ,, . , • :\ \-0 ,• * ..-. „....,...• ,., i ... , ,ae,g-'.-''.":' v.....,.......:.7..-;,, . , .., 4 , - 4 '• i ,,. 4. 4/fr.,-: ' 4 1 ' e.li/0,, Z=L:,•... '"'l• • •iiti, '1. ----.-; .,-4** • -. G.- . • ,_.--- t - .. "11.-: , ,. i ., .. .....k.rn....'' , , , • 8 jr . ..,0 , ,• , Ei,77" r i ' h I t . • [ft • i 1 #1 1 ". ! i' , . . , in ,— * .... 4 . ari I I! I p Et ,17: ,, 1 a 4 1 I i i i I 'irf';',1':'; ',•1`./0 "a ,.- , a:I , 4;11 5 F.1): ti ...,, ., 1 , so , t rv, 1,- . . 111 1 , f • . ! I),• 1 ,, 7.: f#••..!,c/ A , - I : .... . ., f, ,, r; i..; P,. ' 4' !, .," 1.,!,; p, „.• ; ' ,,,,,, !! '4 .'7',..4.,,,•,:• imme —1 ,' 0,1 ',' ' !A 1 1,2*.%7 , *4•••••:!...! '4,. T','"...4. '.., k,I , 4 /44,.; IA' I,'i .' f l•' II' :: !; , fr,:(11 !'... ...4e.14'.i .t? , .":;•:,• ,- ;'4::".%-..t...!.- . -,,o. — •• •;:::;' ,:i a i,..:;-4 k,,.0sr it 4 ra irt.e.,‘•k i '''1',•.::/ '0-,t40104.,,A4i,--''''l'i ''' •\ III • t ..::.•:•11.1i_nif..47.7:..k., . . ,, , 1 i , •. ,.... , . ,. . ,. -,-,s... _, ;E. i .5- _,p. ' . ..''. , ' a F t 17 I rqi "' ....-, -- , , -,-f• i, kr— ::: , v i,,A .,'; L,..,:At.L.q.11. • - C .. , 1 .,,,„..i.. 1,-...:c.r.....e:...-,4,... ••• ,.„.„...lirt4 -• ,:), , r1) ,..,:!....-:-.::,4,..ti,.::. -t- -'--:. - - ' • • °-,•irl. .-:.:?t; 1.7:t•* ?-- ; .7 . ,.:*---,t,....1: , diten: 4... i,. , ,•* ....;:;' !: r -.,,.:•-.. 1‘ • • .a...r•-,..,... . 1. i --,-_,1ft,, ,';:.;;:r : ...‘•..,i•• t-••••'' :'c , • . i,.1, 4 - -t,- i 1 . ,,,4 , .tio:;.-.;--.,„ :e..„- 1., :'Itt,• . ' ' *iv ,..„. .- y.,or.;.%:: •.:-.1..• ,e'----.‘"" '. ' r --'- A\ 14 - ''''''.-- • - 4; 4 I:17,1.-.zz,.. 4:;,...4 4'. ,4•44..m.,. . -' '. ... it\i, ' ) , f ..A q f••,---'::4-%—'" .4,4_Al*„-11.64v... A .4-_:41." • ''66 -r- inamu,,,„ . ,.:4,.:-.7. Arie.rt. qw;' .4 *,'4irfii-;..__,--=-------,--re..' ...: ' ii 1• !:e• ;.:... .,,--• r":, ,..40tio- '. i 1.,0 93mat,-;., ,..c t-- •:..// 4 1 ,; • i „ a r 4 1r, ;41107-'',4 fir'''. / ,. •- .\I 1 •' " • ,' - P '..A • 4,,,,,./--. 1. ,- „,,,. ,d4i. - - / 1 4 ' ' • ' I .fii..k ' t,ijs.,,,,/.,,,,.; ./• ,. ,:,:le.L .-T,.,' ., ., .,,,,,. ili, / o, r;•;;,,,',...likiNv.7, :. 4, *I ' ' ' 1.414 , ''k;‘;!‘. 4'e 4 te•:,c: ',,`,1 i t, ,-"''''••1 r" • '. ,,, ••it Lau/ Title Insurance Co. oration NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS RICHMOND, VIRGINIA Vicki Etherton Amended: 01/10/2000 1 Lawyers Title Of Arizona, Inc. COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE Typed: 11/02/1999 One South Church, Suite 1800 SCHEDULE A Examiner: BW Tucson,AZ 85701 Typist: sm Branch: 024 1. EFFECTIVE DATE: January 3, 2000 at 7:30 A.M. CASE NO. 00404134 2. POLICY OR POLICIES TO BE ISSUED: (a) LTAA Standard Coverage Owner Policy - 1974 (Rev. 01/01/88) AMOUNT: $ 100,000.00 PROPOSED INSURED: GOLDER RANCH FIRE DISTRICT, a (b) None AMOUNT: $ PROPOSED INSURED: (c) None AMOUNT: $ PROPOSED INSURED: 3. TITLE TO THE FEE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND DESCRIBED OR REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT IS AT THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF VESTED IN: VISTOSO PARTNERS, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company 4. THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: Exhibit A Attached Hereto and Made a Part Hereof. FEB 2 2 2.000 COUNTERSIGNED AT: TUCSON, ARIZONA THIS COMMITMENT IS INVALID Lawyers Title Of Arizona, Inc. UNLESS THE INSURING PROVISIONS AND SCHEDULES A AND B ARE ATTACHED By: ,, Authorized Officer A nt I .Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS RICHMOND, VIRGINIA SCHEDULE B—SECTION 1 REQUIREMENTS THE FOLLOWING ARE THE REQUIREMENTS TO BE COMPLIED WITH: ITEM (A) PAYMENT TO OR FOR THE ACCOUNT OF THE GRANTORS OR MORTGAGORS OF THE FULL CONSIDERATION FOR THE ESTATE OR INTEREST TO BE INSURED. ITEM (B) PROPER INSTRUMENT(S) CREATING THE ESTATE OR INTEREST TO BE INSURED MUST BE EXECUTED AND DULY FILED FOR RECORD, TO WIT: 1. TAXES for the first half of the year 1999 are shown paid in the amount of$4,248.92 . (State Tax Parcel No. 219-54-002A8) 2. Approval by the parties to this transaction of the change in description: APPROVED : 3. The right is reserved to make additional exceptions or requirements upon submission of the full name of the proposed insured. 4. FURNISH a copy of the Articles of Organization, stamped "filed" by the Arizona Corporation Commission, and any amendments thereto, of VISTOSO PARTNERS, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company. FURNISH a fully executed copy of the Operating Agreement, and any amendments thereto, of VISTOSO PARTNERS, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company. PROPER showing as to the current members of VISTOSO PARTNERS, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company. The right is reserved to make additional exceptions or requirements upon examination of the documents requested above. 5. Record Partial Release and Reconveyance of the subject property from Deed of Trust: Amount: $1,500,000.00 Dated: April 7, 1999 Recorded: April 9, 1999 Docket: 11022 Page: 1313 Trustor: VISTOSO PARTNERS, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company Trustee: SCOTT M. COLES, a licensed real estate broker Beneficiary: MORTGAGES LTD., an Arizona corporation NOTE: A.R.S. Section 11-480(A) provides ... Effective January 1, 1991, each instrument (presented to a county recorder for recordation) shall be no larger than eight and one-half inches in width and no longer than fourteen inches and shall have a print size no smaller than 10 point type AND shall have at least a one-half inch margin across the bottom and the left and right sides from the top to the bottom. The first page shall have a top margin of at least two inches of vertical space from left to right and shall be reserved for recordation and return address information. CASE NO. 00404134 .:HEDULE B—SECTION 1 (CONTINUL_, THE BENEFICIAL INTEREST under said Deed of Trust was assigned by instrument: Recorded: April 9, 1999 Docket : 11022 Page : 1325 Assignee: MP032004 L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company, as to an undivided 42.934% interest and MP062003 L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company, as to an undivided 23.733% interest and MP092004 L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company, as to an undivided 33.333% interest 6. Record Partial Release and Reconveyance of the subject property from Deed of Trust: Amount: $17,410,000.00 Dated: February 24, 1994 Recorded: February 25, 1994 Docket: 9737 Page: 1230 Trustor: VISTOSO PARTNERS, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company Trustee: FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Beneficiary: C.K.R.V. LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, an Arizona limited partnership 7. Record Satisfaction of Judgment entered in Justice Court and docketed in the Superior Court of Arizona: County of: Pima Case No.: T41604 Amount: $5,000.00 plus attorney's fees, interest and costs Debtor: VISTOSO PARTNERS/RANCHO VISTO Creditor: TRAIL DUST JEEP TOURS, INC. Attorney for Creditor: Diana Simon Recorded: December 6, 1999 Docket: 11187 Page: 693 NOTE: A partial release can only be executed by the judgment creditor. 8. Record Deed and Affidavit of Value from VISTOSO PARTNERS, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company, to GOLDER RANCH FIRE DISTRICT, a NOTE: If Power of Attorney being used for this transaction, submit to the Title Officer sufficiently prior to close of this transaction for approval. Such further requirements as may be necessary after completion of the above. Furnish Affidavit of Authority with any Power of Attorney. CASE NO. 00404134 Page 3 of 6 Lawyer- Title Insurance Corpuration NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS RICHMOND, VIRGINIA SCHEDULE B—SECTION 2 EXCEPTIONS THE POLICY OR POLICIES TO BE ISSUED WILL CONTAIN EXCEPTIONS TO THE FOLLOWING UNLESS SAME ARE DISPOSED OF TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE COMPANY. 1. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by the Commitment. 2. Taxes for the second half of the year 1999, a lien now due and payable. Any action, subsequent to the date hereof, by the Pima County Assessor and Treasurer reassessing, altering and/or increasing the current or any prior years taxes or assessments. 3. All matters as set forth in the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions in instrument: Recorded in Docket: 8021 Page: 925 and amended in Docket 8327 at page 2058 and amended in Docket 8629 at page 576 and Supplemental recorded in Docket 8494 at page 189 and amended in Docket 10037 at page 1540 NOTE: This exception omits any covenant, condition or restriction based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin, unless and only to the extent that the restriction is not in violation of state or federal law, or relates to a handicap, but does not discriminate against handicapped people. 4. EASEMENT and rights incident thereto, as set forth in instrument: Recorded in Book 75 Pages: 364 and 541 Purpose: electric transmission 5. EASEMENT and rights incident thereto, as set forth in instrument: Recorded in Docket: 8425 Page: 949 Purpose: utilities NOTE: IF POLICY IS TO BE ISSUED IN SUPPORT OF A MORTGAGE LOAN, ATTENTION IS DIRECTED TO THE FACT THAT THE COMPANY CAN ASSUME NO LIABILITY UNDER ITS POLICY, THE CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS, OR INSURED CLOSING SERVICE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ANY CONSUMER CREDIT PROTECTION OR TRUTH IN LENDING LAW IN CONNECTION WITH SAID MORTGAGE LOAN. CASE NO. 00404134 :HEDULE B—SECTION 2 (CONTINUE 6. EASEMENT and rights incident thereto, as set forth in instrument: Recorded in Docket: 8533 Page: 1088 Purpose: utilities 7. EASEMENT and rights incident thereto, as set forth in instrument: Recorded in Docket: 10902 Page: 21 Purpose: sewer lines, manholes and appurtenances 8. Inclusion within the Golder Ranch Fire District recorded in Docket 10631 at page 49. CASE NO. 00404134 Page 5 of 6 Exhibit A CASE NO. 404134 That portion of the Southeast Quarter of Section 36, Township 11 South, Range 13 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Pima County,Arizona, described as follows: COMMENCING at the South Quarter corner of said Section 36; THENCE North 89 degrees 52 minutes 21 seconds East, along the South line of said Southeast Quarter, a distance of 189.17 feet; THENCE North 15 degrees 47 minutes 24 seconds East, 685.39 feet,to the POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE North 15 degrees 17 minutes 16 seconds East, 234.99 feet to a point on the Southerly right of way line of Woodburne Avenue recorded in Docket 9737 at page 1706, and the arc of a non tangent curve concave to the Northeast, a radial line of said curve through said point having a bearing of South 35 degrees 25 minutes 53 seconds West; THENCE Southeasterly along said right of way line and the arc of said curve, to the left, having a radius of 1233.63 feet and a central angle of 12 degrees 34 minutes 06 seconds for an arc distance of 270.61 feet to a non tangent line; THENCE South 30 degrees 05 minutes 17 seconds West, 231.63 feet; THENCE North 59 degrees 54 minutes 43 seconds West, 210.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. F. ANN ROI JEZ� RECORDER DOC. 11187 C `RECORDED F BEM PAG: 693 DEPUTY RECORDER �� NO. OF PAGES: 1 2057 ROOE � ?' � ;; SEQUENCE: 19992330248 i W j / 12/06/1999 TRAIL DUST JEEP TOURS INC 7 O / JDG 14:11 1665 S CRAYCROFT TUCSON AZ 85711 MAIL AMOUNT PAID $ 10.00 -._P±MA COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE RECORDED ON IN BOOK , PAGE AT REQUEST OF BY DEPUTY FEE PIMA COUNTY JUSTICE COURT 115 N. CHURCH TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701 740-3529 TRAIL DUST JEEP TOURS INC, ) Plaintiff, 41604 vs. ) CIVIL ACTION No. CV99-004892 RA CERTIFIED TRANSCRIPT OF JUDGMENT VISTOSO PARTNERS/RANCHO VISTO, ) Defendant, ) SUPERIOR COURT CASE NUMBER ) ) ' Judgment entered in the above entitled matter on 14-Sep-1999 in the amount of $5,000.00 plus court costs of $72.50, attorney fees of $0.00, accrued interest of $0.00 and interest in the amount of 10.000% per annum from 15-Sep-1999 for TRAIL DUST JEEP TOURS, INC., an Arizona corporation, IV2._ LO - and against VISTOSO PARTNERS/RANCHO .VISTOSO REALTY as Ordered by Judge SHEPHERD , Pima County Justice Court .t•7 Special Instructions: 1r PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY DEFENDANT'S ATTORN DIANA SIMON STATE OF ARIZONA } SS. COUNTY OF PIMA The foregoing instrument is a full, true and correct transcript of • the original judgment filed with this office. PIMA COUNTY JUSTICE COURTS fq Attested // /J l 2. JUSTIC E PEAC" JP195 • ,STATE OF ARIZ,ONAl ss. COUNTY OF:PIMA ,per The foregoin& instru'ixleut Is a full,,ttue;•and'correct copy of the origina1;oh file•in this:office. Altfes i'AT , ;4: . OLAND, Clerk By -Deputy ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Paul Nzomo,Public Works* Craig Civalier,Planning&Zoning* Sergeant Chuck Trujillo &Kim Jones,Police Department* Don Manspeaker, Oro Valley Water* Lucia Thurston,Pima County Wastewater Steve Schoon,Golder Ranch Fire District* Cory Pintor,TEP Jeff Weir,Economic Development Ainsley Reeder,Parks&Recreation Administrator* John Zukas,Transit Administrator Bryant Nodine, Planning&Zoning Administrator Brent Sinclair, Community Development Director Terry Vosler, Building Division* *Core Group Reviewers FROM: Bayer Vella, Senior Planner DATE: March 6, 2000 RE: Development Review Committee Agenda for Friday, March 10th,2000 8:30 a.m. Agenda Review 8:45 a.m. OV12-00-06, Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 7 Parcel I Development Plan: The applicant, Golder Ranch Fire Department, requests approval of a new fire station within Rancho Vistoso NH7. The proposed development includes a 6,900 sq./ft structure and associated parking. Location: The subject property is located approximately 0.35 miles west of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard, east and adjacent to the WAPA easement, approximately 0.2 miles north of Tangerine Road, and south of Woodburne Avenue. The WAPA easement runs along the west side of the 1.25-acre site. Note: Transmittals were distributed on 2/29/00 Assigned Planner: Bayer Vella,bvellagorovalley.net 9:00 a.m. Aforementioned Applicant Attending 9:30am OV 12-99-12, Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 5, Parcel S Development Plan: The applicant, represented by Ace Engineering, requests approval of a Professional Office Complex that includes 5 structures. The building area is 32,810 sq./ft. Each DRC Agenda Page 2 building will be individually owned--condominium style--with common parking, landscaping etc. Location: The subject property is located at the southeast intersection of Rancho Vistoso Blvd. and Arrowsmith Road. Note: Transmittals were distributed on 2/28/00 Assigned Planner: Melissa Shaw,mshaw4orovalley.net 9:45am Aforementioned Applicant Attending 10:15am OV12-00-03, Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 3 and 4 Preliminary Plat: This is an 1154 acres block plat and grading concept for an area zoned Campus Park Industrial and C-2. Location: The subject property is located south of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard, west of Oracle Road, and east of Big Wash. Tangerine Road bisects the two neighborhoods. Note: Transmittals were distributed on 2/25/00 10:30am Aforementioned Applicant Attending 11:00 a.m. OV 12-00-02: Ventana Medical Systems Headquarters & Manufacturing Development Plan. The site is located in Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 3,Lot 7. Note: Transmittals were distributed on 2/25/00 Assigned Planners: Bryant Nodine,bnodine@orovalley.net 11:30am Applicants Attending: Shawn Homberg of ER+HDR Architecture, Inc. \\OV_PZD\PZ1\Agendas\DRC\3-10-00 DRC.doc Mar 08 00 02: 31p p. 2 ', t414"' PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 201 N. Stone Avenue, 1st Floor Tucson,Arizona 85701-1207 JUDITH A.PATRICK PHONE(520)740-6520 Director FAX(520)798-1836 MEMO TO: Bayer Vella, Senior Planner Town of Oro Valley FROM: Maggie Shaw, Civil Engineering Assistant (DEQ) i ��/7. �� ' SUBJECT: Golder Ranch Fire Station, Rancho Vistoso Neigh. 7 Parcel I OV12-00-06 DATE: March 8, 2000 On behalf of PDEQ, the Development Plan has been reviewed for conformance with Department of Environmental Quality requirements. Please note the following comments: 1. The Development Plan is approved. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at 740-6706. The Department's Air Quality Control District requires that air quality activity permits be secured by the developer or prime contractor before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. xc: Richard Grimaldi, Interim Director, PDEQ Lucy Thurston, Development Review Mar 13 00 02: 28p win95 520-571 -4150 p. 2 Tucson Electric Power Company 220 West Sixth Street,Post Office Box 711 Tucson,Arizona 85702 WR#42622 March 8, 2000 Area Codc 520 Telephone 571.4000 Melissa Goddard The WLB Group, Inc. 4444 E. Broadway I ucson, AZ 85 711 Dear Melissa: SUBJECT: GOLDER RANCH FIRE STATION Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 7, Parcel I OV 12-00-06 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed the plans dated February 22, 2000. We are unable to approve the plans at this time. Enclosed is a copy the development plan showing the approximate location of existing facilities. The facilities highlighted in orange also need to be shown on the plan along with the easement recording information before our approval. These facilities could be in conflict with the new driveway and landscaping. If a conflict does exist, all relocation costs will be billable to the developer. Please resubmit two revised bluelines to the Town of Oro Valley for TEP's review. You may contact me at (520) 745-3581 if you have any questions. Sincerely, • 00e1 Cory P for Right of Way Agent Land Management cp Lnclosure cc: B. Vella, Town of Oro Valley, Planning and Zoning Division „i\ (z7 PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 201 N. Stone Aye, 1st Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING SUPERVISOR PH:740.6480 FAX!!:740.6370 TO : TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING NT FROM : KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING SUPE SUBJECT : OV# 12-00-06 RANCHO VISTOSO IGHBO HOOD 7 PARCEL I/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE : March 10, 2000 ****.*****.****,1,** *x.*.*********************************s************************************************** The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/ addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: 1. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to the Town of Oro Valley Planning Department. ***PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING MUST RECEIVE THE SIGNED AND DATED MYLAR PRIOR TO THE ASSIGNMENT OF ANY ADDRESSES. PLEASE COORDINATE THE DELIVERY OF THE MYLAR WITH THE TOWN OF MARANA PLANNING DEPARTMENT.*** 2. All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. - f i cc 7 17/ n>-I An/elm T cc�Nnntf L^Jfl>-1. At:c:7 rlr7 7_r7 I_c Apr 17 00 05: 59p Golder Ranch Fire Dist 825-8043 p. 2 APR-13-00 THU 01:30 PM 1-" ° ;R0UP FAX NO. 520 81 192 P. 02/03 Revised April 13,2000 Revised December 28. 1999 T November 1, 1999 W1 Will No. 185050-A-07A-1003X WALEGH - - LSt 1 t13050Wh071FireStBtion.tt7.wpd Oroup RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 7 FIRE STATION That portion of the Southeast One-Quarter(SE 114)of Section 36. Township 11 South, Range 13 East. Gila and Salt River Meridian, Pima County,Arizona. des bed as follows: COMMENCING at the South One-Quarter(S 1t4)corner of said Section 36; THENCE N 89°5721"E, along the South line of said Southeast One-Quarter(SE 1/4) a distance of 189,17 feet; THENCE N 15°4T24"E, 685.39 feet: THENCE S 61°04'46*E,51.45 feet.to a point on the Easterly line of the 100 foot wile easement recorded in Book 75,(Miscellaneous Records), Page 364 said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE N 15'17'16"E along said Easterly line,229.99 feet to a point on the Southerly right-of-way line of Woodburne Avenue recorded in Docket 9737 at Page 1706,and the arc of a non-tangent curve concave to the Northeast,a radial line of said curve through said point having a bearing of S 32°58'35"W; THENCE Southeasterly along said right-of-way line and the arc of said curve,to the left, having a radius of 1,233.63 feet and a central angle of 12°45'52"for an arc distance of 274.83 feet to a non-tangent line; THENCE S 30°05'1 T'W,241.95 feet; THENCE N 59°08'43"W.215.02 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 1.28 acres or 55,538 square feet,more or less, , r+ Prepared by: THE WLB GROUP, INC. �" `�bt_ fir 122!• p JACK A. Jack A.Buchanan, RLS i BtiCNAktiN b, JABleg �� , , J 4100 u.s.0- - Page 1 of 1 Apr 17 00 05: 59p Golder Ranch Fire Dist 82 -A043 p. 3 APR-13-00 THU 01 :30 PM 1ROUP FAX NO, 520 8L, .192 P. 03/03 • .. SRC R4 fair 6;AZ , N h �. sr I / %0/ �i_ P' 49 'e8 O _ 4, / -itz _-..--- i4 ge_ DKT.8333 PG.1i443 .t , - PARCEL.-7F =__I- - Q o ,s (- 2 i 9-53—004N Jfs_ UOOn `�.\ WAPA 1�,,_ ° Gh-rN arc. 8K.75 AEI SC REC .541 0) <14 9>A`� 8K.75 MISC REC C.364 ' 'a� . ,o �- f ESMT. FOR EitC l c LI I�IE51 N• '?4j? Q. ' q6 _ AND FACILITIES c S3 �S• 7 co k PI 3 542- rpa oO• I FIRE STATION / 417, 11. 55,538 SQ-Fr. 4S-, vp Vs \ ch $' oi(t. r.4 P.O.8 / 4.4.$. itt....0\ Q• ! aSs CO .c) tS he 0 /..: CV op,' -.. 46) \ 1 / `l)/is CO .41 / 1 / i z EXHIBIT TO ACCOMPANY DESCRIPTION OF 189.17' STATION • WTI.t W all69'52'21'E PARCIffe—?'-- t BCSM RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 7 S if COR SEC 36 SECTION 36, T. 11 S., R. 13 IS., G.S.R.M., PIMA COUNT'", ARIZONA 1"=60' WLB# prof ect No. 185050—A07A-1003X N:\185050\NEIGH7\ALTA\FIRE—STATION.DWG Group f 2-28-99 REV-4—13—OO j TRAFFIC STATEMENT FOR PROPOSED GOLDER RANCH FIRE STATION The proposed fire station is to he located on a 1.25 acre site along Woodboume Avenue approximately one-half mile west of the intersection of Woodbourne Avenue with Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and is designed to serve the Rancho Vistoso area. Access to and from the arterial street system will be provided via Woodbourne Avenue which is an urban collector street consisting of a two-lane, 38 foot pavement on an 80-foot right-of-way. Currently,daily traffic volumes on Woodbourne Avenue arc estimated to be approximately 1,000 vehicles per day and would not be expected to grow to more than 2,000 vehicles per day at full Rancho Vistoso build out. Peak hour volumes are estimated to be between 100 and 150 vehicles. Assuming a shift of 20 personnel,the site itself is expected to generate a total of 55 daily one-way trips. The site will not produce a traffic peak hour in the generally accepted sense of the term since it is an emergency operation averaging two to three emergency runs per day and shifts are for a 24- hour period from 8:00 A.M.one day until 8:00 A.M.the next.At the most,in the time period of 7:45 to 8:45 A.M., one could expect 20 arrivals and 20 departures, which would increase the morning peak hour traffic to approximately 140 to 190 vehicles on Woodburn Avenue. The driveways as shown on the site plan are 28 feet wide with 40 foot radii. The internal site layout indicates adequate turning radii for maneuvering a WB-50 vehicle. All emergency vehicles will enter via the southeast driveway and exit via the northwest driveway. 4111 • /g 22852 • oc W1LUAM R. BESS ( i ITEM: ORO VALLEY PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD REPORT MEETING DATE: May 9, 2000 TO: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD FROM: Bayer Vella, Senior Planner SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING — OV12-00-06 GOLDER RANCH FIRE STATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN BACKGROUND: )Hunt& Caraway Architects and the WLB Group, representing the Golder Ranch Fire District, request approval of a Development Plan for a fire station within Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 7 Parcel I. The s jr /r' subject property is located approximately 0.35 miles west of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard, 0.2 miles north j/l../ of Tangerine Road, and abuts the southern edge of Woodbume Avenue. g g ap In addition to Development Plan approval, a conditional use permit(CUP) is required. On April 4, 2000, the Planning & Zoning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the CUP request. The Commission also recommended adoption of the conditions specified in Exhibit B. he applicant is proposing an architectural design that will help insure compatibility with the T 1residential context of the area. On 3/28/00, the applicant provided the Development Review Board and neighboring residents,who were mailed invitations, an architectural preview. Acitze.. 414,4j SUMMARY: Go- ceji, ; s c ikeiz w /TIC S General Plan Designation: Neighborhood Commercial Zoning: C-1 Site Area: 1.23 acres Proposed Structure: 6,900 sq./ft There is one existing Golder Ranch facility located at 1130 East Rancho Vistoso Boulevard, which is in the Sun City area. The site for the proposed station was selected in order to help insure a more functional geographic distribution of emergency services. The District has proposed establishing a fire engine, ambulance, and a water tender/brush truck at the proposed site. In addition, at least one paramedic unit would be available at all times. SURROUNDING LAND USE: North: Rancho Vistoso NH 7F,Reflections Subdivision It is important to note that the backs of the homes abut Woodburn Avenue. Furthermore, a wall encloses the subdivision. In addition,the units are similar in height to the proposed fire station. East: Vacant Land,Zoned C-1 West: WAPA Easement and a Utility Substation, PAD Open Space South: Vacant Land,Zoned C-1 GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE: The Neighborhood Commercial designation provides for commercial areas located at the intersections of arterial roadways...with proximity to residential areas. Within these areas-- uses, such as grocery stores and drugstores, tend to serve the surrounding neighborhoods and are integrated with those neighborhoods. The following specific policies are applicable to the Development Plan: • Policy 1.1E: View Protections shall be an essential aspect of Oro Valley's community design review and project approval The site is within the Tangerine Corridor Overlay District(TCOD) and a viewshed analysis has been submitted. The applicant provided eight photographs that were taken at 50' intervals along Tangerine Road. Although varying terrain and vegetation obscure the site, it is evident that the rooftop will be discernable to passersby on Tangerine Road. In fact, the residences along the north side of Woodburne Ave are noticeable. Within TCOD, there are specific site planning and design review criteria to insure minimal view disturbance. Each criterion is addressed in the Architectural Review of the structure, which has been evaluated in OV 13-00-26 • Policy 2.1 D: Build sidewalks...and provide other specific provisions for safe and convenient use of arterials and collectors by bicyclists and pedestrians. Sidewalks and safe access from the sidewalk to the building has been provided. • Policy 9.1 D:All development proposals should attempt to arrange buildings...to preserve views from adjacent properties and streets while providing privacy for residents. The site is generally flat and the positioning of the building is relatively unobtrusive. The fronts of the adjacent residences (north side of Woodburne Avenue) are oriented to the north. A six-foot subdivision 2 wall screens the backyard view. Beyond the wall, residents will see the front of the station. The fire truck bays are somewhat hidden because they are tucked in along the side of the structure. The Planning & Zoning Commission restricted the building height to 30' (2 stories). In the end, the structure must meet the same height standard as residences across Woodburne Avenue. COMPLIANCE WITH OVZCR The proposed development complies with all major components of the OVZCR. In particular, the applicant has met the intent of the following Design Guidelines: 5b. Design building so that orientation and height are sensitive to adjacent land uses. 5c. Site design should be sensitive to adjacent land uses. As depicted in the orientation of the building and architectural renderings included as part of OV 13-00- 06, the applicant will be matching the building height and architectural features of nearby residences. As previously mentioned, the fire engine bays are sufficiently hidden behind the main façade. As a result, the neighbor's view, over the six-foot high subdivision wall, will primarily be of the façade—not large garage bays. Fire trucks will be stored inside the building. There are two issues regarding non-compliance that may be resolved at a later date: 1. The Landscape plan was developed using an outdated version of the code; therefore, it will be reviewed at a future DRB meeting. 2. An Archeological survey must also be provided. This item may be provided and reviewed prior to the Town Council meeting. Please note,there are several relatively minor items addressed in Exhibit A. TRAFFIC Access to Woodburne Avenue will be provided via two driveways. One will be close to the east property line and will be used for entering and exiting vehicles. The second driveway will be close to the west property line and will utilized for exiting vehicles only. Overall, the site will have a minimal impact to the area road network. Within the site, the design is adequate to accommodate and maneuver fire apparatus. DRAINAGE The site drains primarily from north to south. Most significantly, it is located in the Highland Wash basin. The Highlands wash basin is a critical basin and detention must be provided. The drainage report does not specify the method of retention. The engineer must determine how the detention requirement will be met prior to Town Council hearing. 3 GRADING The site will be mass graded and a grading waiver is not anticipated. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENT: The application was noticed and the property was posted in accord with Town requirements. To date, staff has not received written or verbal comments from adjacent property owners. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval, subject to those conditions attached herewith as Exhibit A. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Exhibit A—Conditions for Approval 2. Development Plan 3. Application \\OV PZD\PZ1\OV\OV12\2000\12-00-06\DRB.RPT.doc 4 EXHIBIT "A" CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL OV12-00-06 GOLDER RANCH FIRE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1. Section 9-107 of the OVZR must be strictly adhered to — unless specifically modified by the Town Council. In particular, the Development Plan and - - scape Plan must depict a landscape-parking island adjacent to the interior sidewalk. c a.$ 2. Add the net building area to the General Notes. 3. Approval of the development plan shall be effective for two years, but may be extended upon reapplication and review by the staff and Council. 4. A note shall be included on the development plan that states that the applicant shall be responsible for allocating 1% of the cost of all private projects to provide funding for public art. 5. All communications equipment must be established in a manner to minimize visual impacts from neighbors to the north. 6. The development plan and the drainage concept plan are in conflict. Prior to Town Council approval, the engineer shall clarify what design is intended and modify the report and/or plans accordingly. 7. Specify the retention/detention credit now or construct retention/detention facilities on site. This issue must be resolved prior to Town Council consideration. 8. The Landscape Plan must be approved prior to issuance of any building or grading permits. 9. An Archeological assessment in compliance with OVCR Sec. 4-504 must be submitted one week prior to Town Council consideration of the Development Plan. /0- 49- -- 5 (;a d e4�S ,��`�, i,A"�pdT^,F'`t�A„:��Y c 4 `'c � 1++ � ty hf4 1 -l + • i ;Y,,, f# s.H z�`7.k4 iIT�'rS i9..,,''+f t t • �5 ht>�' .fit N!_: a, ,.c=1,17. ,;� y - SITE BEHIND TREES AND RIDGE '1 tiM1w; r�k�r+ y a ptay�° , S m r �'gy i Sv Yi. t' s - • * F1 . Y-1,ty, + i��s� yj .} �! ,din;5`s n n P Air!, View from Tangerine Road RARco v1sroSo 'V'' "-` f�6i�#t�HORHt�OD ��} ,r _ photo taken from this point SITE \ ' ti T � ROAD 0 0 ANGERTN ► 1 1 1 i Base Map Viewshed Analysis RANCHO VISTOSO, N7, PI The WLB Group 199071 A001 April 21 , 2000 Page 1 k ,�,,yy��yyy{{. K e .�i�l;�"+ 'ie i1[ eny Z a ,16,Sr , `. [ t{.. _,cV£�.�}x-)zst$, t.ah�dF^`r r�sf ) s 1 "7}'A"cr3q`A :tf+I �t+^s r;'' �iY.1.5` l.t ,,,,.{r;rs ) A '} f`s 5r{r!' , h t, ri / S i any 1 'i H k t+�,',4 l t+to r.f, t i d,-: SZ .0. > 51 Z s > P '{ust y,.1')..y3rkY`$h ,�, 09�3 �d:,Cyx;Ca.i,v4, 0 j` ,}„„4 :i,, -,, 0.,, r 7 kY S st, r sr 4 u, em • "F IX c �'dtrt �, g4''�"^ .e;l:%+"'Svt { i`a A t"' f S lK 1 C>C^1l a r k y r n r .,,r 1! Z.a fi,�rr �sr+., �r kF.�sS�.¢ '��'4;a',,-,i +"rCt '��i+".Sv .i y vx -y{�-,itv.,�v 1 ' ,a& r s" *4' ':-.:1,u+y Ls4..�.xl�Lt;;>k yvd-01 S ti�Yt^Sr10 . Y -���{�'�3t y,��.I �'F�Y t 1 t4 )��; � ��'I.'y� lxi.. �`s�+F �}'j?l � h )" I 'x�)1t J Y t ,��, � ,a.�. (R�r•.� xsSkG r�!si s. � s yc r� �s qJp -�s S N.s,. ,'s f. ' a'i �P•��,�, le+a fr qrt a S s ) si ++ , .Yi v� i, sr �,.t a t .tu d.'�? #�f°Tt{ � l` �,�,''a..,, ,t r�'yv,� S rQ, ,,,, ks` `g6„ -,� SITE VISIBILE FROM TANGERINE • gt' .�1Z ?4},It ,,..v . ! qr 'l 4�''2sf v, lm t cz,)y' ty,to k t T q+a ,- a«#sir 4 s 'F*q 4.S f r ,rb4„t ii Yrsr x�'tr (t\�C^3'r�#kGs���3 1}sj fn ; ,•E�'4.v �.4hi ��Yt,)�'�'f' �f� : a rtirs 3 :y KF, t t ; 7 '1 • View from Tangerine Road RANG'EO V1STO O tit` / ..� NSR" HOF:HOOD J /( I,(I PAt,EL Ei - photo taken from this point f, SITE \ .t1 - TANGERINE ROAD do_ 4 0 6 0 0 +. i E � f i Base Map Viewshed Analysis RANCHO VISTOSO, NI, PI The WLB Group 199071 A001 April 21 , 2000 Page 2 SITE VISIBILE A FROM TANGERINE iino -.a { oaf:aq x v .M1 ,,, 't m. .,y 4( t View from Tangerine Road RANCHO V1S OS© 4011131 BM* 7�.\ J photo taken from this point -- ! SITE .�' }, , TANGERINE ROAD bl 1 1 ii Base Map Viewshed Analysis RANCHO VISTOSO, N7, PI The WLB Group 199071 A001 April 21 , 2000 Page 3 i ,} 4 '` r,'..> �a�ya7:t n Hsi^ i4'�., LM,3Ey a "st r 6 >'�o" e . 4. • i r \F` {. �l�rK � S"� \ �,�} .r 1 1 �l}r^'4'ysct <\-\ ��`� r t.� \ ti • �;. �t ''iri tri� �� w � P i s x D �- s 1:52}a tar,�C�< r i • - `(t c, d St k k,2 \�5. \c 7 t.4 FtJf }.i f n x a>i Y�:v:�S • �� �� � 3 � � Mkt, 4 � ti �,,�e»\ a �w� ,� �� { tl4 W"T 1 4�' t 40• �; 5 Fkta:S 5/� t1 , S ,�� 4 ,"W ATV .•. u� .4 ,041�•'�ay` Ats t. S{4z`S'` ° t 4 tlu• �- t r � r 3 �'� .. t r.�3'yYK�,t$n�. .'Y Z�y .1�5-.ra t$#�"w[fvt >s�Kt J�� � r? � a .,wd.nP4: SITE SOMEWHAT VISIBILE FROM TANGERINE -aP • • " w . MR "' ` rt• .. t ' r @7 yr View from Tangerine Road RANCHO V1STO3O NEI‘RHOOD_ P ` photo taken from this point a f f r SITE TANG ROAD Base Map Viewshed Analysis RANCHO VISTOSO, N7, PI The WLB Group 199071A001 April 21 , 2000 Page 4 S " ;<�s', '' , i Y`r ''t St� tai E�,��asr y l t s :y„r Pt �,,. �4�,.7 f11 ? }'y1} � 1' ; L �''ly y'. 5/ �i�Aj��. '' .4'J�t t: �� ��` ' 6)h..1.3/•"}�C .i g C.X(k �yM1 eil k T x 9 5 r Aat�� 3ir 3i Z uLfS?a 5 r r >>s Q F7 C a? ,ta '. `i tR}� t(� }} i1 t� ri.�1�; ` ,'..L:1. 'i P}F'aYp tif�� '�;yS�'t7 i ,,k,,`' tt;•.4.:. tr.' a t - xH' R -. 01 x'TW'`4� �" as < s ' ky ' 4K YS y r�.[J.t''A9 , SITE VIS#yIBILE FROM TANGERINE ;. Y V fF.i S, Ilex a*04 fi0 vt..`;v an{r y 4 i,t-r: ,Y,.:r a[{a"4,. t o v+F � 4 i 4 e 1 °i: f f • w re View from Tangerine Road RANCHO vis roso Pifs� HdRHQdD 'I`� ` i il / cfr,\ photo taken from this point i s■/y�j fF SITE " % ,.i ti TANGERINE RO I I II Base Map Viewshed Analysis RANCHO VISTOSO, N7, PI The WLB Group 199071A001 April 21 , 2000 Page 5 u:. s R ?�i!"-z� F -.yy �i _ t t� � • . , SITE SOMEWHAT VISIBILE FROM TANGERINE �Y. • View from Tangerine Road RANCHO V19T090 f \CtEIBORHOOp photo taken from this point SITE TANGERINE ROAD 1 I Base Map Viewshed Analysis RANCHO VISTOSO, N7, PI The WLB Group 199071A001 April 21 , 2000 Page 6 SITE VISIBILE FROM TANGERINE v _44404,04400,440., , , 'b . 4r4ii " .), , ", . tifx, View from Tangerine Road RANCI-1U VISTOSO In i \NBIlciEZHHOOD t ,, photo taken from this point ,_xx SITE l 1• } TANGERINE ROAD _-o_ 4 i 1 . I Base Map Viewshed Analysis RANCHO VISTOSO, N7, PI The WLB Group 199071 A001 April 21 , 2000 Page 7 SITE BEHIND TREES AND RIDGE - : - * • -4 ..! - •• . .., • ,,,,,.. • . ,s,tiloillif . •::,.. : '...,.., rt f. ,,,,N R'rl ` ,ram �. '' Yu. ,,.,. ,,,• y'•" •�a ,to !. View from Tangerine Road _ RANCHO VISTOSO ff (�\NBIelBORHOOD f 1 `, PA .EL H E ,� photo taken from this point 1 - 1 SITE 1 TANGERINE ROAD , , , Base Map Viewshed Analysis RANCHO VISTOSO, N7, PI The WLB Group 199071A001 April 21 , 2000 Page 8 .' i oec... .„,''' ti'' ...'.. , ',„,,, ,.,' ,,..4t • ,, - , -0. . 1 K- ' •..: IP' „.' -• , ..,•;",.., , .,;•:3,,'.4116,' ' . .. . 4.* • .,NW" ••••.. , •• r , 4.4: , ' 11F7.' ' ' ' ' ,,,,i,r- ,4•., . ...., , ". . •. . , ... . . • , , • - - ,----...-------,„ ......,...,...„,....................„___,.„.......,.................. ..... ., ..... , ....., „,,,,,,,,,, ..,.........,;•,4-•,••;,•-• View looking south from patio wall across street . .2 . ..... ,...... ,,... ... ..... ...... ' ; photo taken from this point : re ,t.•- .. .., .... , / : -.. ,,, .ft....;,...., ---......„ i.. , -,,..,„ ..,"....,. ..„......„._ / .., ..... --....,,.. , , / „t. ._... , .... ! ,. . 41110 . , . ...,.L. / E9 pm maw i/ON,i i, i ,Base Map Viewshed Analysis RANCHO VISTOSO, N7, PI The WLB Group 199071A001 April 21,_2000 Page 9 —, a - ', \ \\,(� FF ,,,.,,, . • .,.".--/A ...-, \ "/' /` ‘� V6C .�,; .� RANCHO VIS'�OSO ,,, ,,,/i..i ..:._,.-,-, ,,,,.,. --o o-)f:, -"\ \, N,s-. ,s._•,_,-_'_N2--,'-''•-...--„-,,iv-‘/'N,t il.-.., i./.t.,•-.Z---. ...,,....t.,..c,....:„;o„4,.':,s,?.1 ..-..:,.,/-4-.'--,.0.-.A..-.,,,„.„ .,,z , -,. ...., , ` =!\ \ �� 'p� / .\ / PARCEL H NEIGHBORHOOD 7 �` `� ` `�� !\� / BK.46 M&P/PG.88 // ,- , �N 7 / ,. -... --.. / / Ln/` ,,, 2 7. 7 4., l `` '� •i•is__.,N >7A•„... \ . ,, / /1 ..'- - c-e7-tex PARCEL-7F ,,,,, �, 2790,- \\ - - / 'N - ,.� '.\O �.,., / rrw.,7r, 9 219-53-004N ' / _ __ ------ „ E) `- Oe / _. t . / rk /(,< _ T— __, l�J lJ f � NI \ / \`\ � �J>. FFr v ./\ �,, • / /,4Yw/Al,,,trr I f % 1 OKT.E3J3 PG 10EE 1 •_ ` LIy o \\ / -7♦i_ s7:-.4:4 Gl� V.AtI BK.75 MI SC REC PG.541 WAPA , I, , , ( '/ 1 - J-/- s J�� qb4 "�► `{� t,• \`:.. •�� i( BK.75 MISC REC PG.364 • \•/ • I / ' t / /•; G' \ j++�.` '�� •_ \ , ESMT. FOR ELECTRIC 1 I \ 1 / _• �_ A .- ` , LINES AND FACILITIES `1 I I / / \ {� + ',,,, \�/y����\ 8 \lc//,i r' /1 / i't 1 /i / �, / 1� 1►�' r ci. „ , „ 'i /:/ '‘ \ / i r''''''.1.' \ s ' s'— ----.•— -- ---• •-- ' „,„,, -,,,I, , I f i I ', / / /in ,,, ,,,, ,,-, ,- , i ,,, .,. -- . Ape. -.7-.2-..•,_ - 4,-.,-\-----_-.. ..,_ ----------4'2.. --------••"---..,-'. ,...' / ----. .,,,,_„.„, --_ .____.,____ii,i_. T ___,,_ ,. . „.. _ , , , . , ir V %-.2.:-:" • `- / ; ; i ', 1 i /,' '-\.I.. ‘ t'r '1 ‘` 1:4_ al.'," ' Q4V. )-• ‘, \ --1--'--Zit----4- • -1-‘- -- ss , , , , , ..,,___,I, , , , 4 i 't,e- I, •• 'L Z1 . •e-'',44 \ ,, _ .. -,,,-___ .: --'..-44° -- . '- ---/-<"' '--*/ / , ,,i/;1 / \ ' , , 0 a'1,--'1 1 .. ' lit' t 'r' e N 1-• - -1,---\ lit tir"*"-- ---- ' . ''' — .4, -`''.%:'%..4 4 .,,,,,..._ • • .40 6 '. r. / t I r (( rr Jf \ \ ,\`/ . r.. .4^. tr LT! /o , \ `, - - - - r; / /7' %. / 64. I' —IF% . , / r, l r r / _ 1 / f • • / * / ‘\‘'' \.,, . ,, • . , ir/ . _ , .... ,,, I/ I' '' ! /. /, ( ' -- I/ ,/r i g ••a B ff�r 1 el/ �, �OZS \otS\ r ( , , , < i '' 1(1,,, , k 1,6:of V.' ' . !t 4. •i ,•-• / \ :,,--,,R \ , --., 4i `,„„...,,,, ..,..'' -4‘ i. .-:- ; t9„. , ,, / A if ,,./ / / ,, 0 ,, ,1 ,,,,,,7 t ,-- -„, l' 0 ct) \ .• \ \ . r • / \ \ - r .10.e -N / r �►�ic,; t ,71.E STATION I / / 1 �^ \` \, 'l', . - N a�'�'''� !H'�.4 ; 1 �` •iQ,llt�' ,E c GthO S.f. �� I 510'// Par-� , r \ \ / yB� •\l ` I- •/ z ,po l \ 1 IIll (✓ I \ \ PARC L 1 \\ 1 F - 1\ \ . / /../ , ,__ , I T.E.P. -- - _- --N.. ,N. , .., 0 y / ` ,, __. f + - - 1, v ;-- >-- • ��' r .emu' ' $, / \‘‘ - ,rf ‘ /1 s, / ''' '‘- /•' - ,.___-- ‘ , ,,,c\‘.17-\,‘,.,,,_.,, , --. , _„ ‘. * ', -, - _0°.?::,-,= ', rs,‹ ,‘ --'-rt:--____,../ z _ - N 1 \ .--. t • • . ,r i • Rit' ‘‘ \ i' ',.._7/ si ' , .., - ---''',„ , 424tailD2re , 1 / \ LJNE i I I -\ __ bB�� l 1 , ,( •\\,�,1 if �` ��V�///8 v/�G. \. is 11 /'>!.�N • l C7r { •' \ , , I \ e E N8952'2 -i' / ''' / , ,' / / �`�� ,:j���` ,i,�1 ' �` \, Cit'.C�MCN/Nli • 1 \ I „ �(^ I ......./..„....-_-1 :9, . , 1 /V eft.4Zi/i4,/ / Ele, .• • '.. OF / , / ----, , / \ \ ( C?, --'" 7 n / 5 1/14 COW'SEC-36 i , / / ,. /, / DY�.F/ifLI7' .' yi•%�/; - ------_-__--"- \ (1\ \ •.a + 'N 1 l /' %j 1 i , 1 • 1 f n --': �� ; ' - -. -� 1 ,/ A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR: • ' ` ' ' I ` \ '7 /f's' rf- RANCHO VI STOSOvi `t ���"1' (' l' NEIGHBORHOOD 7, PARCEL I / ( e ../".��J 1A1/171-rt, , �. COLDER RANCH FIRE STATION ' / / / / \ - 22ES2 BEING A PORTION OF THE S.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 36. / 1 / - ' 1111111Yr R. TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, Apr �", t \ Engineering Planning Surveying A ,ir\ Oy 20' 40' soy , / //,///' i/ /rJ /f ( I \,\ J ; �Q �� G.&S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA Thelondncope Architecture Urban Design \` �'M1','j(•C� `� Q Offices located In Tucson.Phoenix _i ,// I / / Ir r1 ', ' \ CONTOUR INTERVAL.. 1' ¢ .I LU Las Vegas.and Victor volley,Co - jf�J f'" SCALE: 1' 20' OV12-00-06 ^� rn IIMM 4444 East Broadway ' / /II j /I( ♦�` ------. W.LBUJOBNO.ARY 21, 2199071A-001-0105 SHEET/21OF002 7 Group Tucson.Arizona (520)�1-7lea - / I . t IIIIIIIIIII%lli / ' a GENERAL NOTES: 4.._.,. .� .. `. . _.i_. _.._.._. _.._ ._ ._..F 1. GROSS AREA OF THiS(EvELOPMENT IS aeACRES./.4 .�8.-'3 .*.� ® 'r��J1 It 2. EXISTING AND PROPOSED ZONING IS RANCHO VISTOSO PAD C-1. GOLDER O LD E R RANCH FIRE STATION �! PROPOSED DENSITY OVERALL SITE PER F.A.R.././../1 y ."1-1, ( . 3. BUILDING SOAK FOOTAGE 6.900 S.F.,INCL.GARAGE. / ./ }�- M4E I L-I - J •- I 4. MIN.AREA OF LANDSCAPE OPEN SPACE REQUIRED=/.� 7..5.5')4'(-cS/•) A PORTION OF RANCHO V I S T O S O ' AREA OF OPEN SPACE PROVIDED IS 16.693 SO.FT. - '� I 11 r I I AREA OF DRAINAGEWAYS IS a'ILl7 �� '�•,� '( wAe THIS �' NEIGHBORHOOD 7 PARCEL I ' PROJECT • 5. AMOUNT Or PARKING SPACES REQUIRED AND ANALYSIS AS FOLLOWS: • GROSS BUILD. AREA-6.900 S.F./400- 17 SPACES J ��'..�• ' i i . ESTIMATED IO EMPLOYEES/2- 5 SPACES DEVELOPMENT PLAN l .. _ �. T,,,r�can+E".o HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE SPACES- 2 SPACES TOTAL 24 SPACES -oo ' NI, am__ �.._. OV12 �6 , _ 3I 31~ I AMOUNT OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED AS iOLLOWS- _ -•• -I � -� y- PARKING SPACES 23 SPACES I`. i-''Ienee.sed r......rI HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE SPACES. 2 SPACES �:�•. �. ;�6 °.• TOTAL- 25 SPACES �,� f ai f ,. BICYCLE PARKING PROVIDED-I CLASS I.2 CLASS II GENERAL NOTES (CONT.): '•`•.- ( `. '..�...,.,,-' �1g q 1 6. /lit7,4G/L D.0:ILEOUIREMENTS: 31. ALL-WEATHER ACCESS WILL BE PROVIDED TO ALL STRUCTURES WITHIN THiS DEVELOPMENT. 'T :\ 1 r"'c MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACKS. FRONT-20'.REAR-25.. v'.'� _�, BUILDING HEGHT-MAXIMUM HEIGHT SHALL NOT EXCEED 30 FEET. -STORIES. 32. ASSURANCES iN THE FORM OF A RESTORATION CASH DEPOSIT IN THE AMOUNT OF ,y a/ . PROVIDED FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A GRADING AND/OR GRUBBING PERMIT TO C� I'" �Irty'^_ GUARANTEE RESTORATION OF ALL DISTURBED AREAS ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTIONS U✓ \J Ifl uiiima raw. -��� 7. BASIS OF BEARING:BASED ON DOCKET 8178.PAGE '966. 4-902 AND 13-603 OF THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED. ,1Oc',-e4( .Ii.A.s 4 i CENTERLINE or RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD. 33. A TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT WILL BE SUBMITTED UNDER A SEPARATE COVER AND 1S TO BE : SAID BEARING BEING: S 32'09'07"E \ i p PART OF THIS DEVELOPMENT. ,ice , 7 rn ._j. -1 IR'� ;I✓f 34. DEVELOPER WILL INSTALL ALL LIGHTING IN CONFORMANCE TO ORO VALLEY LIGHTING COOS ' \ uT a �+ews -�---1-i � 8. BASIS OF ELEVATION ROOT DATUM BENCH MARK: BRASS DISK HEADWALL 70 RIGHT OF I� 7-",' I STATION 710.20 APPROXIMATELY 350'SOUTH OF NORTH 1/4 CORNER OF SEC.5,T.11S.,R.14 E 35. ALL NEW COMMERCIAL RELATED PROJECTS SHALL CONTRIBUTE 1%OF THE PROJECT COST TOWARDS 'j Jr -� BENCHMARK ELEVATION: 26R6.03. PUBUC ART PER SECTION 4-504F.THE DESIGN AND LOCATION SHALL RECEIVE A RECOMMENDATiON • I (,Jp' P J I BY THE TOWN OF 0R0 VALLEY ARTS ADVISORY BOARD PRIOR TO.PROJECT APPROVAL BY THE TOWN G ', 9. DEVELOPER WILL COVENANT TO HOLD THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY,iTS SUCCESSORS.AND COUNCIL THiS IS PUBLIC ART PROVISION SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE GENERAL NOTES FOR THE .DRIVE _ ASSIGNS,HARMLESS IN THE EVENT OF FLOODING. DEVELOPMENT PLAN. THE PUBLIC ART FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL BE APPROVED PRIOR TO THE '- '' - I •w.v�u...ic• APPROVAL OF THE BUILDING PERMIT. Y - y1. 10. DRAINAGE WILL NOT BE ALTERED.DISTURBED OR OBSTRUCTED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL Cr J� 7 r, fed. , , i� L CCS-E�����/U,9)�r1i4Ge THE ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL / -gyp A/,77/7"ETdif/y 'aeo villLf L?�YASv A212Ce014912V-/. 11. THE PROPOSED DRAINAGEWAYS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO APPROVED PLANS LOCATION MAP PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY PERMITS FROM THE TOWN ENGINEER AND/OR BUILDING BEING A PORTION OF SE IV CV SECTION 36 OFFI CI AL. T II S.R.13 E,C.AS.R.M. 12. ACCESS ACROSS FLOOD PRONE AREAS TO BUILDING SITES WILL BE APPROVED BY THE TOWN TOWN OF ORO VALLEY.PIMA COUNTY,ARIZONA ENGINEER AND SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DEVELOPER. 13. ON-SITE TRAVEL LANES DESIGNED FOR WB-50 VEHICLE.DESIGN SPEED EQUALS 15 MPH. \ 14. APPROVED IMPROVEMENT PLANS AND APPROVED ASSURANCES WILL BE REWIRED PRIOR TO LEGEND ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS. 15. ANY RELOCATION.MODIFICATION.ETC.OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND/OR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS NECESSITATED BY THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTS WILL BE AT NO EXPENSE -1�+ _.. EXISTING 5'CONTOUR TO THE PUBU C. I i 16. THE FOLLOWING UTILITIES WILL PROVIDE SERVICE TO THIS DEVELOPMENT: EXISTING 1CONTOUR ((A PO'AER TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY EXISDNC PAVEMENT AND CURB(B GAS SOUTHWEST GAS CORPORATION -W-q'- EXISTING WATERLINE IWATER ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY SEWER PiMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT -5-•§ EXISTING SEWER TELEPHONE U.S.WEST COMMUNICATIONS FIRE PROTECTION COLDER RANCH FIRE DEPT.CABLE TELEVISION JONES INTERCABLE NEW WATERLINE AND VALVE r /.07'Y48( ```�11 -S-�- NEW SEWER LINE ANO MAM+ALEI 17, THiS PROECT WILL BE SERVED BY ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY WHICH HAS BEEN I r1'.z.Z~��DESIGNATED AS HAVING AN ASSURED 100 YEAR WATER SUPPLY BY THE DIRECTOR of WATER I DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARY RESOURCES _+Q OS� v ADJACENT E UNE 18. REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT I5 1.500 C.P.M. TB. ONSiTE SANITARY SEWERS EXCEPT PUBLIC SEWERS WITHIN PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS OR :) ASKO ANAICZO 0.Atl,9PNl 9 RIGHTS-OF-WAY SHALL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED,OPERATED.AND 0.2.Z ACZe.e44.-.9/10 - 2:i ,91440.9t4FCe.0 NoicATES 1/2-RON PIN TAGGED BY MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN 1 C;61,:G- asa Xtr.c,Ga,60, AN R.LS.TO BE SET UPON EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY PIMA COUNTY e,�rG.. COMVLE'nON OF CONSTRUCTION.WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT AT THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL OR PERFORMING OF S. BUILDING PLANS. SECT/OrV W TO BETEs BRASSPOCAPPED SURVEY ��� 1 257- q--7.e.L MONUMENT STAMPED/14145 R.L.S. 20. ALL SEWERS WILL BE DESIGNED TO PROVIDE GRAVITY FLOW. SEC//O� B /�� �((�� (�J �fYOCC CO BEST SET UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. 21. ANY WASTEWATER DISCHARGED INTO THE PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS SHALL MEET 475 iC?..S ��(K) (�) (c1ses ) 010( )��(�)C.P. • FOUND SURV qi EY MONUMENT AS NOTED THE REQUIREMENTS of INDUSTRIAL WASTE ORDINANCE(PIMA COUNTY ORDINANCE NO.1991- 1E 0.66 0.6 1,6 L3 6A (IRON PIN.BRASS CAP.ETC.) 140 AS AMENDED). 2E 0.54 0.6 1.2 1.7 3.5 22. A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT SHALL BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER 3E 0.20 0.1 0.3 0.5 1.1 O DRAINAGE CONCENTRATION POINTIII MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT WHEN CONNECTION IS MADE TO A NEW OR EXISTING PUBLIC 4E 0.24 0.3 0.6 0.6 1.6 6E 0.23 0.2 0.4 0 6 1.2 P[ PIMA COUNTY STANDARD DETAIL NUMBER • MANHOLE BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT, y,, 1 0.34 1.3 1.74 0.6 3.1 23. THE PROPERTY OWNERS.HIS SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS AGREE TO: 1)KEEP ALL REQUIRED LANDSCAPED AREAS MAINTAINED IN A WEED FREE,TRASH FREE • `ii6.00p•,e.t/6 42✓E. 1 2 0.03 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 pRpppSEO CONCRETE CONDITION. r 3 0.66 3.1 4.2 5.0 7.7 2)REPLACE ANY DEAD PLANT MATERIALS WITHIN 90 DAYS AND, .34l0, 75 i 1S' .. A • , O .i ■(97.56) EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION 3)MAINTAIN THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IN PROPER WORKING ORDER. • 24. A SOILS REPORT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED UNDER A SEPARATE COVER AND IS TO BE A PART OF n e ar . 97.56 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION THIS DEVELOPLENT. H.C. PROPOSED HANDICAPPED PARKING 25. THE SOILS ENGINEER OF RECORD OR OTHER REGI STEREO PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE DETAIL b g F F.F.E. FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION WITH EXPERTISE I THE AREA OF SOILS ENGINEERING SHALL CERTIFY.IN WRITING,THAT N.T.S. 4'WHITE ��'7I ALL SOILS OPERATIONS FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT WERE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STRIPE(TIP. L' AtiedeL.S AfeEsfWei�/OE0 RECOMMENDATIONS AS SET FORTH IN THE MOTE CHNICAL INVESTIGATION BY W.T.I.,JOB NO. 2AV.4,616.DATED A1Hdr.e.„6G,2000,AND ANY ACCEPTED AGGENDA/AMENDMENTS MADE aeeee77a.V a.=,.D THERETO.SAID ENGINEER WILL FURTHER CERTIFY,IN WRITING, THAT ALL MATERIALS HANDICAP PARKING SIGN W/ UTiUZED ON 11415 DEVELOPMENT ARE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE ACCEPTED PLANS AND VA"" CODE PLATE "2 P.C./C.0.T. STD. DETAILS: PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING SPECIFICATIONS.CERTIFICATIONS,IN WRITING,ARE TO BE RECEIVED BY THE TOWN VALLEY SIGN SEC.12-502 G ENGINEER OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PRIOR TO THE REQUEST FOR ANY BUILDING I PERMITS AND/OR FINAL INSPECTION AND THE RELEASE OF ASSURANCES. (TYPIACAL) , I AZ,' I200 - CONCRETE SIDEWALK 26. IN PLACE DENSITIES SHALL BE DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH U.B.C.STANDARD NO. .) (y') 207 - WHEELCHAIR RAMP 70-2 IN PLACE DENSITIES SHALL NOT BE DETERMINED BY OTHER U.B.C.STANDARDS UNLESS 2D0 - CONCRETE CURE SPECIFIC WRITTEN APPROVAL IS OBTAINED FROM THE BUILDING OFFICIAL AND TOWN TYPE 1(G) GONG VENT.CURB S GUTTER ENGINEER OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY. VENT 121 12 t 114E 2 GONG CURE 27. THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL CERTIFY,IN WRITING,THAT ALL WI-EEL STOP DETAIL (TYP ). 211 CONC OURS NL1W,n paCUST IMPROVEMENTS.WHETHER PRIVATE OR PUBLIC.HAVE BEEN CONSTRUCTED.PLACED.INSTALLED. ---'-/ WO - aN.0 C 7 / ETC.,IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE ACCEPTED PLANS FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT. '' CERTIFICATIONS,IN WRITING.ARE TO BE RECEIVED BY THE TOWN ENGINEER OF THE TOWN OF r N.T.S. 2/ ' - axe,ie4,41L,P TH OF ORO VALLEY PRIOR TO E REQUEST FOR FINAL INSPECTION AND THE RELEASE OF ' ASSURANCES 25. A DRAINAGE REPORT HAS BEEN PREPARED AND SUBMITTED TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY UNDER SEPARATE COVER. WH 4' ITE 29. A CONCEPT LANDSCAPE PLAN HAS BEEN PREPARED AND SUBMITTED TO THE TOWN OF ORO STRIPE(RJR.) s VALLEY UNDER SEPARATE COVER. h� 30. ACCEPTANCE OF THESE PLANS DOES NOT CONSTITUTE OR IMPLY ACCEPTANCE OF ANY OF THE / _ LL G:FOOWIN //) , .• . A.C. S( • Ai WALLIS).RETAINING OR OTHER TYPE(S). (C AµNY Y REINET3RCED OS PRIMMARRY PPURPOSE IS To FUNCTION AS A RETENTION/ ` A.B.C. A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR: DETENTION STRUCTURE. •• ,�'• a, • SEPARATE PLAN CHECK(S)AND PERMIT(S)ARE REQUIRED,ALL IN ACCORDANCE WiTH THE .4_(%-=1i=N',•'= * %'Y` -_ COMPACTED RANCHO VI STOSO .- APP ICAERE CODES of THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY. BA eA e� p�T _ "/- SURGRALTE NEIGHBORHOOD 7, PARCEL I p TOPE A.G A.B.C. OWNERf DEV�LQPER -%,►"'�,!L• COLDER RANCH FIRE STATION r� GOLDER RANCH FIRE DEPT. 1�, `, HEAVY '(cat.2) 1 6' 3535 E. HAWSER ST. r.1 BEING A PORTI ON OF THE SE. 1/4 OF SECTION 36, V HANDICAP PARKING DETAIL TYPICAL-PAVEMENT SECTION ORO VALLEY, AZ 85737 Ih R6waN R TOWNSHIP it SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, o The Engineering Planning SurveyingC.8 S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY,PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA • Landscape Architecture Urbor Oes,gn N.T,S N,T.S C/O CHIEF JOHN FINK E 'L'Cr = WLB Offices locoteo in Tucson, Phoenix Los ARgos.and VVictor (520) 825-9001 Mosey.Co {milge7 / Group 4444 East Broadway FEBRUARY 21. 2000 �A%Z%� Tucson.Arizona (520)661-7460 IMW.LB. JOB NO. 199071A-001-0105 SHEET 1 OF 2 1 '2 MINUTES OF THE ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING TUESDAY May 9, 2000 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE CALL TO ORDER: 6:05 p.m. ROLL CALL: Present Patti Lewis, Chair Jim Vogelsberg,Vice Chair Nancy Mager, Member Bruce Enger,Member Absent Richard Underwood,Member Mary Glueck,Member Barbara Bell,Member Others Present: Bayer Vella, Senior Planner Craig Civalier,PE Paul Nzomo, PE Dan Dudley, Town Attorney EXECUTIVE SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM MOTION: Moved seconded (Chair Lewis/Vogelsberg) to go into Executive Session at 6:30 p.m. Motion carried, 4-0. The Executive Session was called for the following purpose: 1. Pursuant to ARS38-431.03 (A) (3) to obtain legal advise relating to OV12-99-18 Naranja Ridge Estates Preliminary Plat and related matters. MOTION: Moved seconded (Mager/Enger) to go out of Executive Session at 6:55 p.m. Motioned carried, 4-0. RESUME REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 7:PM CALL TO ORDER- 7:05 p.m. 05-09-00 Development Review Board Minutes Page 2 ROLL CALL: Patti Lewis, Chair Jim Vogelsberg,Vice Chair Bruce Enger,Member Nancy Mager,Member APPROVAL OF MARCH 28 &APRIL DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MINUTES MOTION: Moved seconded (Enger/Vogelsberg) and carried by a 4-0 vote (Bell/Glueck/Enger absent) to approve the minutes of March 28, and April 11, 2000 Development Review Board minutes as written. Member Mager wanted it on the record she was not present at the April 11, 2000 meeting. CONSENT AGENDA A. OV13-00-17 HUNTER DEVELOPMENT, MODEL 966,VISTA DEL ORO B. OV13-00-24 CANADA VISTA HOME - MODELS, VISTOSO ESTATES LOTS 30-35 C. OV13-00-21 C & C CONSTRUCTION, CUSTOM HOME, TANGERINE HEIGHTS LOTS 11 & 14 MOTION: Moved seconded (Vogelsberg/Mager) and carried by a 4-0 vote (Bell/Glueck/Underwood absent) to recommend approval of Consent Items A-C REGULAR AGENDA Chair Lewis announced that item 2 on the agenda would be rearranged to item 1 and item 2 moved to item 4. OV12-99-18 NARANJA RIDGE ESTATES PRELIMINARY PLAT CONTINUED Bayer Vella introduced the staff report into the record. Michael Marks, representing the Wong family, presented a preliminary plat for a 21 lot/R1-144 residential development to the Development Review Board on 2/8/2000. At the meeting, visual impacts, insufficient right-of-way width, use of the WAPA easement, drainage concerns, and encroachment into sensitive areas were issues introduced by Town staff and emphasized by neighboring property owners. As a result, the Development Review Board voted to continue the item and provided the following instructions: The continuance is subject to staff conditions, stipulating the applicant meet with the neighbors of Monte de Oro and The Highlands to come to a compromise, and applicant meet with staff to resolve differences. If differences cannot be resolved project will be continued for another 30 days if parties are in agreement to an extension. 05-09-00 Development Review Board Minutes Page 3 Primarily due to the inadequacy of the ROW width and drainage, staff recommends denial of this plat. Larry Schubart, Attorney representing the Wong Family Partnership, addressed the DRB and briefly reviewed the annexation agreement of Naranja Ridge, he commented that the development standards regulation and ordinances in effect at the time the property was under the Pima County jurisdiction would apply to the development of the property. He further stated that the Town of Oro Valley has already sought a legal opinion, the opinion rendered by outside counsel for the Town made it clear, that only the annexation and development agreement applied and there was no standard required for Open Space for a cluster development. The owners have submitted a 21 lot or R1-144 subdivision plat for the subject property. This project meets the Pima County standards as well as the drainage requirements and all objected standards of approval. Mr. Schubart respectfully asks approval of this plat. PUBLIC HEARING OPENED: Esther Underwood, 10945 N. Pomegranate asked why is there a lawyer addressing the DRB? She feels it's because there is a promise that someone doesn't want to keep. She asked the DRB to make the right decision and to keep the neighbors surrounding the development in mind. Bill Adler, 1720 N. Eagle Eye Place, feels the Town has an obligation to protect the safety and welfare of the citizens. He stated that good faith negotiations needed to be engaged and resolved. He provided a copy of Article 5 paragraph B, of the annexation agreement which states "In the event that a dispute arises regarding any aspect of this Agreement, the parties disputing such and issue shall act in food faith and with the intent of the Agreement as the foundation for resolving such issues." He asked the DRB to make a motion to require good faith negotiations. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED: Discussion followed the hearing and Member Vogelsberg commented he could not recommend approval because all issues have not been resolved. • The right-of-way width • Proposed drainage mitigation is substandard MOTION: Moved seconded(Vogelsberg/Mager)to recommend denial of OV12-99-18 Naranja Ridge Estates Preliminary Plat, motion carried by a 4-0 vote (Bell/Glueck/Underwood absent). OV12-00-06 GOLDER RANCH FIRE STATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN Bayer Vella introduced the staff report into the record. Hunt & Caraway Architects and the WLB Group, 05-09-00 Development Review Board Minutes Page 4 representing the Golder Ranch Fire District, request approval of a Development Plan for a fire station within Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 7 Parcel I. The subject property is located approximately 0.35 miles west of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard, 0.2 miles north of Tangerine Road, and abuts the southern edge of Woodburne Avenue. In addition to Development Plan approval, a conditional use permit (CUP) is required. On April 4, 2000, the Planning &Zoning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the CUP request. The Commission also recommended adoption of the conditions specified in Exhibit B. The applicant is proposing an architectural design that will help insure compatibility with the residential context of the area. On 3/28/00, the applicant provided the Development Review Board and neighboring residents, who were mailed invitations, an architectural preview. Staff recommends approval of this development plan however, there needs to be an added condition regarding the parking, due to the Landscaping Island being provided. This would cut two parking spaces of the 25 proposed, 24 spaces required by code. Craig Civalier introduced the engineer's report into the record. He stated overall, the site will have a minimal impact to the area road network. The site will be mass graded and a grading waiver is not anticipated. He stated that he is working with the applicant on the detention requirement and that would be settled before it goes to Town Council. MOTION: Moved seconded (Mager/Enger) to recommend approval of OV 12-00-06 Golder Ranch Fire Station Development Plan, subject to staff conditions and stipulating an additional condition number 10 to reduce the required parking to 23 spaces. Motion carried, 4-0 (Bell/Glueck Underwood absent) STAFF CONDITIONS: 1. Section 9-107 of the OVZR must be strictly adhered to — unless specifically modified by the Town Council. In particular, the Development Plan and Landscape Plan must depict a landscape-parking island adjacent to the interior sidewalk. 2. Add the net building area to the General Notes. 3. Approval of the development plan shall be effective for two years, but may be extended upon reapplication and review by the staff and Council. 4. A note shall be included on the development plan that states that the applicant shall be responsible for allocating 1% of the cost of all private projects to provide funding for public art. 5. All communications equipment must be established in a manner to minimize visual impacts from neighbors to the north. 6. The development plan and the drainage concept plan are in conflict. Prior to Town Council approval, the engineer shall clarify what design is intended and modify the report and/or plans 05-09-00 Development Review Board Minutes Page 5 accordingly. 7. Specify the retention/detention credit now or construct retention/detention facilities on site. This issue must be resolved prior to Town Council consideration. 8. The Landscape Plan must be approved prior to issuance of any building or grading permits. 9. An Archeological assessment in compliance with OVCR Sec. 4-504 must be submitted one week prior to Town Council consideration of the Development Plan. 10. Reduce the required parking to 23 spaces OV13-00-26 REQUEST FOR ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL FOR A GOLDER RANCH FIRE STATION Bayer Vella introduced the staff report into the record. He reported there is an extensive list of criteria involved in reviewing this project. The OVZCR Design Guidelines, Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District, and Rancho Vistoso PAD all specify the need to establish a non- intrusive and stylistically compatible design. The architecture includes Territorial style features. The Architect has incorporated the use of brick, traditional colors, and an extensive use of windows to break up and diversify the building mass. Most significantly, the architectural treatments, building height, and hiding of mechanical and communication equipment help insure that building fits within the style of the predominately residential area. Staff recommends approval subject to the Staff conditions. Tamara Caraway, of Hunt & Caraway Architects presented her report to the DRB. Samples of the roof tile, brick, and stucco colors were provided. She stated staff conditions were acceptable. MOTION: Moved seconded (Vogelsberg/Enger) to recommend approval of OV 13-00-26 Golder Ranch Fire Station Architecture, subject to the following staff conditions. Motion carried, 4-0 (Bell/Glueck/Underwood absent) STAFF CONDITIONS: 1. Spark arrestors shall be camouflaged with a cap, as approved by Planning and Zoning. 2. All windows shall utilize pop-outs or be recessed on all sides 3. Ground-mounted mechanical equipment shall be enclosed by a wall to provide visual screening and noise mitigation • 05-09-00 Development Review Board Minutes Page 6 4. All flat-roofed segments of the structure must have roof coatings painted to match the stucco. 5. Architectural rooftop treatments and architectural details on all facades is required to screen equipment. 6. Subdued lighting for entries, signage and parking areas is required. 7. All communications equipment may not exceed the building height and must not be visible from Woodburne Avenue or Tangerine Road. Such equipment must blend in color and placement with the building. OV13-00-05 ADDENDUM TO THE ORO VALLEY RETAIL CENTER(ROONEY RANCH) COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PACKAGE Bayer Vella introduced the staff report into the record. David K.Jones,P.C.,representing The Barclay Group, submitted a request to substantially amend the Rooney Ranch Retail Center Comprehensive Sign Package. Specifically, the proposed amendments would alter, if approved, Section G of the PAD and the Parcel D Sign Package Guidelines (both attached). It is important to emphasize that the Sign Guidelines only address Area D within the overall development. Area D includes 39.86 acres and is located west of Oracle Road and south of North First Avenue. The Development Review Board considered each of the applicant's requests on 4/11/00. The Board voted unanimously to recommend denial of three out the four requests. The Board, staff, and the applicant did agree, however, that a methodology to measure wall signs should be established. As a result, the item was continued to allow staff and the applicant time to develop appropriate verbiage. PUBLIC HEARING OPENED: Richard Feinberg, 1451 E. Triton Place, stated that this proposal is confusing. He said he understood what staff is trying to do, he asked if wording could be added to these amendments that would allow visual determination to enter into the final decision. He commented that the sign should be judged visually and not mathematically. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED: In response to the question from Mr. Feinberg, Bayer Vella said Mr. Feinberg was correct in the difficulty of the mathematical approach. But in terms of adding visual approach to the definition he wasn't sure how that could be done. If DRB is interested in pursuing that, verbiage could be added. MOTION: Moved seconded (Vogelsberg/Mager) to recommend approval of OV 13-00-05 Rooney Ranch Sign Package Amendment. Stipulating these proposal be added in as footnote#6 and#7. Motion carried, 3-1 (Chair Lewis opposed) (Bell/Glueck/Underwood absent). • 05-09-00 Development Review Board Minutes Page 7 A 5-minute recess was called. OV12-00-05 RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 7 PARCEL A, PRELIMINARY PLAT Michael Shanley, Planner I, introduced the staff report into the record. EEC, representing the developer, Vistoso Partners, requests approval for a preliminary plat. The proposed preliminary plat is 47.15 acres and will consist of 55 single-family lots. The proposed plat is located south and adjacent to Moore Road, west and adjacent to Highlands Wash, and east of Vistoso Ridge subdivision, which is currently being developed. The preliminary plat complies with Policy 6.1D, recommending linkage of recreation facilities and natural acres through a community open space network. Staff recommends approval of the Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 7 Parcel A subject to Staff conditions. Craig Civalier introduced the staff report into the record. Approximately 550 new trips will be generated daily by the proposed 55 single-family dwelling units. Access to parcel A will be provided by subdivision streets that will connect to Moore Road. Regarding drainage, this site is located on a parcel of land that is a series ridges washes on the westside of the Highland wash. The existing runoff flows off the ridges into the washes and then to Highlands Wash. This project is in conformance with the Master Highlands Wash Basin Study. Grading, this is a combined mass graded and custom graded subdivision. Eight lots will require type 1 grading permits. The Rancho Vistoso PAD grading standards apply to this subdivision. Over 26 acres are to be undisturbed as Common Areas. Ryan Bale, of EEC, representing the developer Vistoso Partners, was present for questions. He stated he is agreeable with the staff conditions and would like to keep the 25-foot building height. Linda Arnold, 180 W. Linda Vista, commented she was speaking for lot owners and homeowners in Sunridge. Mrs. Arnold expressed her concerns that they were not informed of this submittal. She expressed she stands for growth that respects the land and neighboring subdivisions. She would like to support this preliminary plat but had suggestions for changes regarding buffer area, height restriction, impact to washes in the area, and eliminating all private streets. Keith Johansen, 637 W. Kachina Ridge Place, expressed his concerns regarding height restriction and lot sizes. He bought his lot because of the tremendous views. He would like to see the height of the homes restricted to 18 feet. He stated he was in agreement with Mrs. Arnold and her concerns. Thomas Dwan, 1110 W. Antelope Creek Way, he stated he owns lots 36 and 39 in Sunridge. He felt that if there were ho height restrictions it would affect the view from his home. He also commented that there should be restrictions to the building envelope. MOTION: Moved seconded (Enger/Mager) to recommend approval of OV 12-00-05 "Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 7 Parcel A, Preliminary Plat subject to the following staff conditions. Motion carried, 3-1 (Vogelsberg opposed) (Bell/Glueck/Underwood absent) • 05-09-00 Development Review Board Minutes Page 8 STAFF CONDITIONS: 1. Zoning Code (a) Per Sec. 4-305-B-16; Approval of the plat shall be effective for 6 months and maybe extended upon reapplication and review by Staff and Council. (b) Per Sec. 305-E-la, Label concentration points for the pre-development with their corresponding flows (c) Per Sec. 4-305-G-1 and 2; provide archaeological clearance. (d) Per Sec. 4-305 H-8, indicate typical and minimal lot sizes on the plat. No lot sizes are indicated some lot dimensions are missing, see redlines. 2. Lots 29-31 have a maximum cut or fill of 6 vertical feet as defined in OVZCR Sec. 15-401 and house construction on these lots shall be limited to one (1) story not to exceed 25 ft. 3. Terrace walls shall be landscaped to minimize the visual impact from surrounding property including open space and trails. The landscape plan will provide details on how this is to be accomplished. 4. The trail in Highlands Wash shall be constructed in a manner acceptable in design to the P &Z Administrator and shall include signage at the intersections of the paths and public ROW. The trail and associated amenities shall be depicted on the Landscape Plan. 5. Preliminary Plat, PP • Some lot dimensions are missing, see redlines. • All cul-de-sac radii shall be labeled 42-ft. • Label all detention basins with the appropriate letter to correspond with the drainage report. • Sheet 1 • Add the following to note 7, ", and detention basins. An annual maintenance record shall be kept for inspection by the Town of Oro Valley." • Add the following to note 22, "The common areas are reserved as private drainage easements." • Some of the roads shown on the location map are incomplete, see redlines. • Add a note that states the number of miles of new public and private roads. • Add to the legend the symbol for the trail in Highlands Wash. • Sheet 2 • The centerline curve data is missing for Rock Creek Road just north of Kwame Court. • Label the 10-ft strip of common area C next to lot 10. • Label all drainage easements as drainage and access easements. • Add the missing lot line dimensions. • Add to detail of"Building Setbacks,: typical lot size and minimum lot area in sf. • On detail B add the dry utilities under the PUE on the right side of the detail. • Remove detail A. • Sheet 3 • 05-09-00 Development Review Board Minutes Page 9 • The centerline curve data is missing for the first curve east of Rock Creek Road on Kwame Court. • A sewer easement is required for the sanitary sewer in common area C next to lots 48 and 51. • Label all drainage easements as drainage and access easements. • The Q100 flow at concentration point F is 8.2-cfs not 5.7-cfs. • Sheet 4 • Label all detention basins with the appropriate letter to correspond with the drainage report. • Detail A, B and E; label the contours with the corresponding elevation. Allow for the appropriate slope runout for grading purposes. • Show the overflow structures for all of the basins. • Add the appropriate scale to all basin diagrams. • Add the basin volume table to the plan. Show the bleeder pipes for all basins on the plan and profile details. • Cross section D, the 8-ft max height of the terrace has been exceeded on basin D. • The invert elevation of basin of E on the plan does not match the drainage report. Please clarify. • The invert elevation is missing cross section E. 6. Drainage Report • More detail shall be added to the drainage report narrative with regard to how the detention basins will be designed to accommodate maintenance. This shall include addressing access/egress into and out of the pond as well as and mobility of maintenance equipment(e.g. a backhoe) within the basin. • Check for sediment transport that can plug up the bleeder pipes. • There are inconsistent diameters called out in the drainage report for detention basin outlet pipes. In the appendix on the graph paper that shows a typical pond outlet, where is the weir as mention in the Developed Condition section? The report states that s 5.5-inch orifice will be installed in the 12-inch bleeder pipes, this detail shows a 4-inch opening. The drainage report shall be revised to address the inconsistencies. • Trash racks are required for outlet pipes 24-inches in diameter or less. • Provide energy dissipaters and hydraulic calculations for all locations where concentrated flow exists on the site. • Page 2, under Developed Condition; change 56 lots to 55 lots. • Reservoir routing calculations for basin C, the plan shows a 1-ft storage capacity and the report shows 2-ft, please clarify. A similar situation exists for basin D.0 • Channel Ratings, show the required freeboard and appropriate calculations for all channels. • Show the floodplain limits and water surface elevation for the Highlands Wash adjacent to the project site shall be shown on the preliminary and final plat as well as on the drainage plan site maps. • Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain delineation from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to determine that none of the work proposed with this project is within waters of the U.S. 05-09-00 Development Review Board Minutes Page 10 • In the `Scupper& Curb Opening Calculations' data section of the drainage report, the verbiage shall be revised to indicate that the scuppers will be constructed per Pima County standards/details. • Channel 'A' data/calculations shall be added to the drainage report. • More detail shall be added to the drainage report narrative with regard to the HEC-1 modeling run. The narrative shall include identifications of basins, reaches, timing and numerical values for Q100 of the Highlands Wash at Tangerine Road. 7. Per Sec. 4-609-H, backing of lots to thoroughfares is prohibited and Lots 4 through 10 do not meet the code for lot planning. Traffic noise and other interference mitigation measures are to be proposed. Rear lot lines shall be reduced and a 15' landscape buffer shall be dedicated as Common Area to be maintained by the HOA. 8. Private drive to Lots 9 & 10 will be adjusted to minimize fill. 9. Applicant and Staff will work to consider extending the cul-de-sac "Britta Marie Ct."to serve Lots 40 through 44 in order to eliminate the private drive. 10. Visual impact of the development from the south and west, shall be mitigated by a conditional requirement that Lots 40 through 44 are limited to one (1) story, not to exceed 25 ft. 11. Provide a Buffer Yard "C"between lot 55 and development to the west and work with Staff to allow landscaping within the ROW of Granite View Dr cul-de-sac. OV13-00-19 TRIMARK HOMES REQUEST FOR ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL - MODEL HOMES, RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 13 F, LOTS 35-38, 41-45, 78-89 Bayer Vella introduced the staff report into the record. Trimark Homes has submitted plans for four model homes to be built at Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 13, Parcel F, Lots 35-38,41-45, and 78-89. This subdivision is also known as 8th Green at Vistoso. The gross area of this subdivision is 43.85 acres with a total number of 89 lots. The average lot size is 15,617 square feet and the existing zoning is Rancho Vistoso P.A.D. medium high density residential. The model numbers are 2380, 3180, 3568, and 3600, which correspond to the square footage of livable space. These models have been built at Scottsdale, Arizona,but are new to Oro Valley. The architecture of these models can be described as Sonoran Contemporary. The models are all single story and have pitched tile roofs. All of the homes have covered entrances and rear patios. There are three different front façade treatments (elevations, A,B, and C) for each model. All 'B' elevations feature the use of artificial stone on the wainscoting at the front facade. All of the homes have the options for a bonus room or bedroom with a two or three car garage, or a four car garage without an extra room. Staff recommends approval of the request subject to staff conditions. 05-09-00 Development Review Board Minutes Page 11 Scott Fidel, Project Manager for Trimark Homes, was present to answer questions from DRB. He stated he did not have any problem with staff conditions. Color samples were provided as well as actual photos of the homes. The discussion among the Board members was favorable, they asked the applicant not to build like elevation models next to each other. MOTION: Moved seconded (Mager/Vogelsberg) to recommend approval of OV13-00-19 Trimark Homes, Models for Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 13 Parcel F, Lots 35-38, 41-45, 78-89 subject to the following staff conditions and stipulating condition number 5 be added, stating identical elevations shall not be aligned to adjacent properties. Motion carried, 4-0 (Bell/Glueck/Underwood absent). STAFF CONDITIONS: 1. Spark arrestors shall be camouflaged with a cap, as approved by Planning and Zoning. 2. All windows shall utilize pop-outs or be recessed on all sides, except under porches. 3. Ground-mounted mechanical equipment shall be enclosed by a wall to provide visual screening and noise mitigation 4. All flat-roofed segments of the home must have roof coatings painted to match the stucco. 5. Identical elevations shall not be aligned with adjacent properties. OV12-00-03 RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 3 PHASE I LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMMERCE LOOP ALIGNMENT SOUTH OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD AND 0.4 MILES WEST OF ORACLE ROAD Bryant Nodine introduced the staff report into the record. The WLB Group, representing the property owners, request DRB recommendation of approval of a Landscape Plan for the development of Commerce Loop Drive and other streets in Phase I of Neighborhood 3. The existing condition of the site is mostly undisturbed desert. A ridge runs north-northeast and south-southeast through the site with steep slopes to the east and west of Phase I and small drainages and small areas of steep slopes along the drainages within Phase I. The vegetation is typical of upland areas in its composition and features some relatively large specimens of palo verde. While there is significant vegetation on the site most of it is in the washes or slopes that are not impacted by grading for this plat. 05-09-00 Development Review Board Minutes Page 12 The proposed landscape plan shows landscaping along the roadways that will be developed as a part of Phase I of Neighborhood 3 the plan is in generally in conformance with the development standards of the OVZCR.. However, as noted in the conditions, there are submittal requirements and some additional areas of landscaping (corners, the entry way, and graded common areas) that need to be addressed. Overall the proposed landscape meets or exceeds the Code in its density, size, and low water use. All of the trees are 24"box where the Code only requires 40%to be 24"box. Two plants are included that are not on the Oro Valley Plant List: Leucophylulum Candidum and Salvia Clevelandii. Staff has accepted the former based on the Arizona Department of Water Resources list and has added condition for a fact sheet on the salvia. Staff recommends approval of the proposed Phase Ito the landscape plan subject to Staff conditions. Charles Hulsey, of The WLB Group, representing the applicant Vistoso Partners, was present for questions. He commented this is the first industrial project for Rancho Vistoso and would like to make this project campus like with lots of trees. MOTION: Moved seconded (Vogelsberg/Mager) to recommend approval of OV12-00-03 Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 3 Phase I Landscape Plan for development of the Commerce Loop Alignment South of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and 0.4 miles west of Oracle Road subject to staff conditions. Stipulating applicant and staff work on pedestrian paths. Motion carried, 4-0 (Bell/Glueck/Underwood) absent. STAFF CONDITIONS: 1. Show north arrows on all key maps (14-205A3). 2. Include all the items for a correct title block in the lower right hand corner of each sheet (14-205A4). 3. Show sight visibility triangles at each intersection(14-205A5). 4. Provide a fact sheet for Salvia Clevelandii (14-205B1b). 5. Provide the quantity of salvaged plants in the Plant Legend on page 3. The number of salvaged plants must match the number of plants in the approved NPPP for Phase I including any required mitigation (14-205C3). 6. The bike path on the west side of Commerce Loop is not shown in accordance with the plat and improvement plan. 7. All bike paths shall be shown at 8' minimum—they are shown tapering to 5' near intersections. 8. One-foot contours are required on all sheets (14-205B10). Also include contours for the common areas that need to be landscaped (see condition#14). 9. On sheet 1, General Note#5 must include the total area to be graded, including created slopes (14- 05-09-00 Development Review Board Minutes Page 13 205B11). 10. On sheet 2 indicate the entry way treatment. 11. On sheet 3 delete decomposed granite from the legend if it is not proposed for use. 12. On sheet 4 indicate the treatment for the corners. If proposed for future landscaping indicate when and by whom. 13. On sheet 5 move the vegetation off the bike path. 14. On sheets 8 through 11 there are cuts and fills along the ROW's that extend the grading into common areas. Include these and any other graded common areas in the landscape plan because they won't be included in future development plans (14-205 C 1). Coordinate the landscape plan with the improvement plan to show all slope treatments (14-205B7). 15. Revise sheet 10 to show the location of the bike path and provide landscaping between the bike path and the current ROW. 16. Obtain acceptance and a permit from the Town Engineer for landscaping in the right-of-way. 17. All DRB conditions need to be addressed in the resubmitttal to Town Council. STAFF REPORT: Bayer Vella explained to the Board that the application for DRB has been revised asking that the applicant provide color samples at the time the application is submitted. Also the Town resolution requires all applicants present material on the overhead. He informed the DRB that Member Glueck has given her resignation as of June 1, 2000. He asked the Board Members to consider some type of Thank You that could be presented to her. MOTION: Moved seconded (Vogelsberg/Enger) and carried by a vote (4-0) to adjourn the May 9, 2000 Development Review Board Meeting at 9:45 PM Shirley Gay DRB Clerk 05-09-00 Development Review Board Minutes Page 14 I PREHISTORIC SETTLEMENT IN THE CANADA DEL ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA: THE RANCHO VISTOSO SURVEY PROJECT By Douglas B. Craig and Henry D. Wallace Contributions by Lisa G. Eppley James Heidke James P. Holmlund James P. Lombard Cristine R. Szuter BY: I INSTITUTE FOR AMERICAN RESEARCH ANTHROPOLOGICAL PAPERS NO. 8 1987 I I 15 ABSTRACT r This report presents the results of an intensive archaeological survey of the Rancho Vistoso properties, an approximately 7,700 acre parcel in the southern Canada del Oro I 'Valley, Arizona. Fifty-four archaeological sites were identified, all but three of which date to the Hohokam occupation of the area. The three non-Hohokam sites are historic sites that date to the early part of the 20th century. The significance of these sites is assessed and recommendations made for future work in the project area. ,.ii Analysis focused on the Hohokam materials, with the main goal being to place the sites into their proper temporal and regional settlement contexts. Specialized mapping I techniques were used to record and collect two large Hohokam ballcourt village sites within the property boundaries: Honey Bee Village and Sleeping Snake Village. Shifts in settlement patterns within these two sites are discussed, which are, in turn, related to more general settlement shifts in the region as a whole. A new model of regional interaction is proposed in light of these data. I I t... II • lit a. Li I LIST OF FIGURES Page 1. 1. General location map of the Rancho Vistoso survey area. 2 2.1. Geomorphic surfaces in the Rancho Vistoso study area. 7 I 2.2. Soil types in the Rancho Vistoso study area. 7 I/ 2.3. Vegetation communities in the Rancho Vistoso study area. 10 2.4. Hohokam village sites in relation to Holocene terraces (hatched areas), 12 Ieastern Tortolita Mountains pediment zone. 3. 1. Comparison of phase and period sequences between the Tucson and 18 Phoenix Basin Hohokam chronologies. I 3.1. Tucson Basin Hohokam chronology (after Wallace and Craig 1986). 18 5.1. Intensity of survey coverage in Rancho Vistoso study area. 24 5.2. Form and coding index used during survey to record slicks, mortars, 26 cupules, and metates. I 5.3. Form used during survey to record petroglyphs. 28 I 5.4. Collection unit form used at Honey Bee Village and Sleeping Snake 32 Village. 6.1. Recorded sites in the.Rancho vistoso study area. 36 IL 6.2. Rancho Vistoso sites by site class and cultural features present. 41 6.3. Mapof HoneyBee Village.IL_ 8 49 6.4 Contour map of ballcourt at Honey Bee Village (10 cm contour 50 intervals). 6.5. Plan view of compound at Honey Bee Village. 51 1 6.6. Sleeping Snake Village site map. 52 7.1. Sample coding form for decorated and redware ceramic analysis. 59 t� n • I . I Site Descriptions 41 AA:12: BB:9: ASM SURVEY / �-BOUNDARY CJ sr' I e° I -• 249 8 lid x I C� XI 2•l •' —��\x '�• 1 H 040 wr . . . .\11.r)' . I • X\�_���Llw ^\ • .1/41/457 K2 • uix •. lx • n I 1 .\ . \ • _ ' 0 j\I\r.. .zi\-12-"'°%... *4 o 2 0 O t NS6 O ~�, j'.� ? IT9 0 . . i y o/0.+�7 i ® o HT\ ' y I 1 • ' • (.\(ICI 180 0 ON u2 nso 1 49 `� foITS 'n 1.00I OO• 0 I '•� • / 17• • . (`jp 7� /l)1*iDYI • \;\ \\ / / • 11, / // ra ro los• '�\ . .,.,. r' MOORC ROAD rDIDT• '```' - i( (' 11 .� ▪ JJ ,..1 � 'o 1 MILE } ( ' : �� AI ns • 1 KILOMETER r J / EXPLANATION: ( j• ` ( 1 0 Artifact scatter / `\ 1 I Village `� V Q \ t ) _■ •\ QuarryTA ROAD G i L H Historic site X Mortars and/or slicks (-' • Roosting pit i` A Rock piles I • Petroglyphs Figure 6.2 Rancho Vistoso sites by site class and cultural features present. I probably would have been grouped together (as they are here). They are similar to each other in size, location, and general artifact characteristics. Although a fragment of Laevicardium was recovered from the surface of BB:9:153, ground stone and lithic tools were absent; therefore, it actually had a lower artifact class diversity than either BB:9:152 or BB:9:154. Both ground stone and lithic tools, however, were recovered during mitigation of BB:9:153. The analysis of the BB:9:153 materials is just beginning so it is still .too early to know for sure what the function of the site may have been. There is reason to believe that the site was used on a seasonal basis, perhaps as a field house by Hohokam farmers growing crops in the nearby floodplain, but this awaits further analysis. Based on the I I . MAY-15-00 MON 07:58 AM WLB GROUP FAX NO. 520 881 7492 P. 02/02 INC. ENv1KONMMMTAL CanSuLTArIT5 43 squtli Scott Aveeiue Tucson_Arizona 85701 (5701 323-O 4•I'M.(520)375-7033 May 12, 2000 Steve O1tverto WL Group 444.4 Frn+t } roadway Tucson, Arizonn 85711 Dear MT. otitierio: Per your request, 5'CV.CA archaeologists have reviewed the site file records for Neighborhood 7, Parcel I of the Rancho Yistoso Planned Area Development, Oro Valley, Arizona- We have found that there are no known cultural resources within Parcel I and,therefore,recommend cultural resource clearance. Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions regarding this matter. Thank you. .Sincerely, Mark L. Chenault Principal Investigator cc: Thomas omas Mot finger/SVGA .Melissa Keane/SWCA Richard Maes/Vistosa Partner T~ e'N� ott r\MAR NG1ti l.w' • AUSTIN • t ENver. - DURANQO - FL.AC]STAFF NoUSTohi SALT LAirrL CITY • TUC5Qt1 • TtJLAROSA TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 8 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: May 17,2000 • TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Bayer Vella, Senior Planner SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING, ORDINANCE NO. (0)00-1 7 , ON 8_,-00-06 GOLDER RANCH FIRE STATION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WOODBURNE AVENUE 0.35 MILES WEST OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD BACKGROUND: Hunt& Caraway Architects and the WLB Group, representing the Golder Ranch Fire District, request a CUP for a fire station within Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 7 Parcel I. This CUP request was presented to the Planning &Zoning Commission on March 7, 2000. It was continued due to issues relating to the WAPA easement, which is located along the western edge of the parcel. The applicant originally proposed utilizing the easement for ingress and egress. Due to Chief Fink's efforts, the issue was resolved by shifting the site eastward. The site no longer encroaches into PAD designated Open Space. On April 4, 2000, the Planning & Zoning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the request. The Commission also recommended adoption of the conditions specified in Exhibit A. NATURE OF REQUEST: General Plan Designation: Neighborhood Commercial Zoning: C-1 Site Area: 1.23 acres Proposed Structure: 6,900 sq./ft Golder Ranch Fire District has proposed establishing a fire engine, ambulance, and a water tender/brush truck at the proposed site. In addition, at least one paramedic unit would be available at all times. SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: Rancho Vistoso NH 7F, Reflections Subdivision It is important to note that the backs of the homes, which are enclosed within a wall, abut Woodburne Avenue. East: Vacant Land, Zoned C-1 West: WAPA Easement and a Utility Substation, PAD Open Space South: Vacant Land, Zoned C-1 Aik GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE: The Neighborhood Commercial designation provides for commercial areas located at the intersections of arterial roadways...with proximity to residential areas. Uses, such as grocery stores and drugstores, should "serve the surrounding neighborhoods and are integrated with those neighborhoods". TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 4 The following specific policies are applicable to the conditional use permit: • Policy 1.1 E: View Protections shall be an essential aspect of Oro Valley's community design review and project approval The site is within the Tangerine Overlay District and viewshed analysis will be required as part of the Development Plan. • Goal 6.1: To develop a comprehensive and connected parks, open space, and trails system. • Policy 6.1 A: Plan for the connection of open space, natural areas, parks, and recreation areas to minimize conflicts with the environment. • Policy 6.1 E: Trails shall ultimately connect to public preserves and the regional trail network per the Eastern Pima County Trails System Master Plan, where possible. The WAPA easement is a component of the Plan. • Policy 6.1 J: Develop a bike paths system that is separate form the roadway and serves to interconnect various public facilities such as schools, parks, trails, open space areas, etc. In order to meet the intent of the aforementioned policies, staff recommended having the developer construct a trail along the abutting WAPA easement. The Planning & Zoning Commission, however, felt this improvement should be addressed with Rancho Vistoso in the future. COMPLIANCE WITH OVZCR ARTICLE 3-2, USE PERMITS: Use permits may be granted when the determination has been made that the granting of such conditional use permit will not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare. In arriving at this determination, the "factors to be considered shall" include the following: 1. Damage or nuisance arising from noise, smoke, odor, dust, vibration or illumination; For the residential units to the north, there is an obvious potential noise impact. According to Chief Fink, the firefighters would refrain from utilizing the audible sirens when exiting the fire station and driving through the first block; however, they are utilized—on occasion-- if traffic conflicts exist. It is apparent this strategy has worked in the Sun City area. According to the Fire Chief, they have received very few complaints. This issue is addressed further in the Conditions for Specific Uses section of this report. 2. Hazard to persons and property from possible explosion, contamination, fire or flood; This proposed site would have a diametrically opposite effect by reducing hazard risk in the area. 3. Hazard occasioned by unusual volume or character of traffic. In the advent of an emergency, the character of the traffic would be unusual for this area. Woodburne Avenue would be adequate; nonetheless, to facilitate the proposed traffic for the following reasons: • In accord with engineering standards, it's a suitable two lane 25 mph collector street • TOWN OF ORO VALLEY AikCOUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 3 of 4 IP • The Avenue does not have any driveway curb cuts. This will help minimize potential traffic conflicts. 4. The proposed use must also be reasonably compatible with others in the surrounding area. The site appears to be suitable for the following reasons: • Non-residential zoning and uses surround the site on three sides. • An existing 6' wall and two-lane street buffer the residential units to the north. • The fronts of the residential units are oriented to the north of Woodburne Avenue. OVZCR CONDITIONS FOR SPECIFIC USES Within section 9-107, there are nineteen(19) specific requirements pertaining to Fire Stations. "No use permit for a fire station...shall be granted unless the "requirements/criteria have been met". The following are significant items: 1. When abutting a residential district, sirens on vehicles shall not be activated until emergency vehicles reach the nearest arterial street. The closest arterial is Rancho Vistoso Boulevard. ARS 28-624C requires the use of a siren, bell, or exhaust whistle and at least one lighted lamp to proceed through a stop sign, exceed the speed limit, etc. 0 As a result, the Commission recommended applying the OVZCR requirement with additional flexibility. In an emergency, sirens may be utilized only when traffic conflicts exist along Woodburne Ave. 2. A landscape plan shall be submitted in accordance with Article 14-2 of this Code. The landscape plan will be addressed with the Development Plan. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENT: Staff has not received any written comments upon completion of this report. A property owner addressed the Planning & Zoning Commission at the first meeting. He expressed concerns regarding noise, potential traffic conflicts, general impact on residential properties, and endangerment of children in the area. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval, subject to those conditions attached herewith as Exhibit A. SUGGESTED MOTIONS: I move to recommend approval of Ordinance No. (0)00— 17 ,OV8-00-01, Golder Ranch Fire District iilConditional Use Permit with the conditions listed in Exhibit A, attached herewith. OR TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 4 of 4 move to recommend approval of Ordinance No. (0)00— 17 ,OV8-00-01, Golder Ranch Fire District Conditional Use Permit with the conditions listed in Exhibit A, attached herewith, and the following added conditions: . OR I move to recommend denial of Ordinance No. (0)00— 17 ,OV8-00-01, Golder Ranch Fire District Conditional Use Permit, finding that . ATTACHMENTS: 1. Exhibit A—Conditions for Approval 2. Ordinance (0)00-17 3. Concept Site Plan al Plannin and Zoni Administrator , / .‘"e\ Community Develo ment Director ati4 Town Manager \\OV_PZD\PZ 1\OV\Ov8\8-00-01\TC Report.doc EXHIBIT "A" CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL OV8-00-01 GOLDER RANCH FIRE DISTRICT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 1. All conditions depicted within Section 9-107 of the OVZR must be strictly adhered to — unless specifically modified by the Town Council. 2. Emergency sirens may only be utilized when traffic conflicts exist along Woodburne Ave. Otherwise, sirens on vehicles shall not be activated until emergency vehicles reach the nearest arterial street. 3. The building height, including mechanical equipment, antennae, or associated communications equipment must not exceed a total of 30 feet in height and two stories. 4. All communications equipment must be established in a manner to minimize visual impacts from neighbors to the north. 5. Establish landscaping that abuts the sidewalk within the parking area in order to comply with Sec. 9-1070(2)of the OVZCR. Revise the site plan and Development Plan accordingly. 6. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, provide a letter of approval from Pima County establishing approval of the encroachments on the two-onsite sewer easements. ORDINANCE NO. (0)00- 17 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY,ARIZONA, FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ESTABLISH A GOLDER RANCH FIRE DISTRICT STATION WITHIN RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 7 PARCEL I ON WOODBURNE AVENUE, FIXING THE EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF; AND REPEALING ANY OTHER ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH. WHEREAS,The Golder Ranch Fire District has requested a Conditional Use Permit(CUP)to establish a fire station within Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 7 Parcel I. The subject property is located approximately 0.35 miles west of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard, 0.2 miles north of Tangerine Road, and abuts the southern edge of Woodburne Avenue; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, reviewed said CUP at a duly noticed Public Hearing, in accordance with State Statue, and having made its recommendations to the Town Council; and WHEREAS, the Oro Valley Town Council has duly considered the CUP with added conditions at a Public Hearing and finds that it is consistent with the Town's General Plan, and other Town ordinances, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY: SECTION 1. That the CUP for establishing a Golder Ranch Fire District Station be granted, and that all applicable development standards in the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised and the conditions attached as Exhibit"A" shall apply thereto to said property. SECTION 2. That all ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be repealed to the extent of such conflict. SECTION 3. That this ordinance and the various parts thereof are hereby declared to be severable. If any section, sub-section, sentence, clause, word or phrase of this ordinance is, for any reason,held to be unconstitutional, such holdings shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance. ORDINANCE NO. (0)00-17 (continued) PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 17th day of May , 2000. Paul H. Loomis,Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Dan L. Dudley, Town Attorney \\OV PZD\PZ1\OV\Ov8\8-00-01\TC ORDINANCE.doc _Att. eeper--- TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 9 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: May 17,2000 • TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Bayer Vella, Senior Planner SUBJECT: OV12-00-06, GOLDER RANCH FIRE STATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WOODBURNE AVENUE 0.35 MILES WEST OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD BACKGROUND: Hunt & Caraway Architects and the WLB Group, representing the Golder Ranch Fire District, request approval of a Development Plan for a fire station within Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 7 Parcel I. The subject property is located approximately 0.35 miles west of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard, 0.2 miles north of Tangerine Road, and abuts the southern edge of Woodburne Avenue. The applicant is proposing an architectural design that will help insure compatibility with the residential context of the area. On May 9th, the Development Review Board will review the Development Plan and Architectural details. DRB's recommendation will be reported at the Town Council meeting. SUMMARY: 53enera1 Plan Designation: Neighborhood Commercial Zoning: C-1 Site Area: 1.23 acres Proposed Structure: 6,900 sq./ft SURROUNDING LAND USE: North: Rancho Vistoso NH 7F, Reflections Subdivision The backs of these homes abut Woodburne Avenue and a six-foot masonry wall encloses the subdivision. In addition, the units are similar in height to the proposed fire station. East: Vacant Land, Zoned C-1 West: WAPA Easement and a Utility Substation, PAD Open Space South: Vacant Land, Zoned C-1 GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE: The Neighborhood Commercial designation provides for commercial areas located at the intersections of arterial roadways...with proximity to residential areas. Within these areas, uses such as grocery stores and jekdrugstores, tend to serve the surrounding neighborhoods and are integrated with those neighborhoods. The following specific policies are applicable to the Development Plan: TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 3 0• Policy 1.1E: View Protections shall be an essential aspect of Oro Valley's community design review and project approval The site is within the Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District (TRCOD) and a viewshed analysis has been submitted. The applicant provided eight photographs that were taken at 50' intervals along Tangerine Road. Although varying terrain and vegetation obscure the site, the rooftop will be visible from Tangerine Road. Within TRCOD, there are specific site planning and design review criteria to insure minimal view disturbance. Each criterion is addressed in the Architectural Review of the structure, which has been evaluated by the DRB. Use of non-intrusive desert colors has been emphasized to minimize view impacts. • Policy 2.1D: Build sidewalks...and provide other specific provisions for safe and convenient use of arterials and collectors by bicyclists and pedestrians. Sidewalks and safe access from the sidewalk to the building has been proposed. • Policy 9.1D: All development proposals should attempt to arrange buildings...to preserve views from adjacent properties and streets while providing privacy for residents. The site is generally flat and the positioning of the building is relatively unobtrusive. The fronts of the adjacent residences (north side of Woodburne Avenue) are oriented to the north. A six-foot subdivision wall screens the ackyard view. Beyond the wall, residents will see the front of the station. The fire truck bays are somewhat hidden because they are along the side of the structure away from the street. The Planning & Zoning Commission restricted the building height to 30' (2 stories), the same height as residences across Woodburne Avenue. COMPLIANCE WITH OVZCR The proposed development complies with all major components of the OVZCR. In particular, the applicant has met the intent of the following Design Guidelines: 5b. Design building so that orientation and height are sensitive to adjacent land uses. 5c. Site design should be sensitive to adjacent land uses. As depicted in the orientation of the building and architectural renderings included as part of OV 13-00-06, the applicant will be matching the building height and architectural features of nearby residences. The fire engine bays are sufficiently hidden behind the main façade. As a result, the neighbors' view, over the six-foot high subdivision wall, will be of the façade—not large garage bays. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENT: .The application was noticed and the property was posted in accord with Town requirements. To date, staff has not received written or verbal comments from adjacent property owners. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 3 of 3 ' COMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval, subject to those conditions depicted in Exhibit A. SUGGESTED MOTIONS The Council may wish to consider one of the following motions: I move to approve OV 12-00-06, Golder Ranch Fire Station Development Plan, effective upon satisfaction of the attached conditions listed in Exhibit A attached herewith. OR I move to approve OV 12-00-06, Golder Ranch Fire Station Development Plan, effective upon satisfaction of the attached conditions listed in Exhibit A, attached herewith, and the following added conditions: OR I move to deny OV 12-00-06, Golder Ranch Fire Station Development Plan, finding that: . Attachments: . Exhibit A—Conditions for Approval 2. Reduced Copy of Development Plan )01L Planning and Zoning Administrator iJaa[27,;(L*- Community Development Director (ii; .(tg-t%) \\OV_PZD\PZ1\OV\OV 12\2000\12-00-06\TCReport.doc Town Manager EXHIBIT A OV12-00-06 GOLDER RANCH FIRE STATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1. Section 9-107 of the OVZR must be strictly adhered to — unless specifically modified by the Town Council. In particular, the Development Plan and Landscape Plan must depict a landscape-parking island adjacent to the interior sidewalk. 2. Add the net building area to the General Notes. 3. Approval of the development plan shall be effective for two years, but may be extended upon reapplication and review by the staff and Council. 4. A note shall be included on the development plan that states that the applicant shall be responsible for allocating 1%of the construction cost of funding for public art. 5. All communications equipment must be established in a manner to minimize visual impacts from neighbors to the north. 6. The Landscape Plan must be approved prior to issuance of any building or grading permits. F:\OV\OV 12\2000\12-00-06\TCReport.doc • GENERAL NOTES: 4 - 1. GROSS AREA OF THIS DEVELOPMENT IS/..78ACRES/ .SIB•.Q3<Sy.fl. ,, . •_ . J. ..-..r-. -..-..-..- -..-..- .'- , GOLD ER RANCH FI. e!3 =�!.. . 2. EXISTING AND PROPOSED ZONING IS RANCHO VISTOSO PAD C-7. N ` / I PROPOSED DENSITY OVERALL SITE PER F.A.R.=/,j.•I.7� q______.72?3. BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE: 6,900 S.F.,INCL.GARAGE. / 3'- t MILE II i 4. MIN.AREA OF LANDSCAPE OPEN SPACE REQUIRED=/.fi e.7.�.5�I�(-cSy> AREA OF OPEN SPACE PROVIDED IS 16,693 S0.FT. I p / • AREA OF DRAINAGEWAYS[S,7t,1O,1�.iT ',���/� kw:7\ THIS I-�OF PA,V.�°,s.�s.�AN�- NEIGHB4RI�C t 7' PARDEL5. AMOUNT OF PARKING SPACES REWIRED AND ANALYSIS AS FOLLOWS: , PROJECT 31 -�• 1 1 CROSS BUILD.AREA 6,900 S.F./400= 17 SPACES ESTIMATED 10 EMPLOYEES/2- 5 SPACES (/ ( � �v� DEVELOP ENTPLAN ,-_-- LL HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE SPACES= 2 SPACES `! �� .-TANGERINE Fn". 01/12-00-66 �fl//3fOTd7AC a lsTA�e PB- 24 SPACES 1 tAr...5 ., _ T- / _ 1 '- AMOUNT OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED AS FOLLOWS: I -----I _-- 361 31 PARKING SPACES 2/SPACES - -• - -�_•�- -- .- - •�-•- HANDiCAP ACCESSIBLE SPACES- 2 SPACES I "�L-Lwtmu Imo- 1 6 ( °, ,TOTAL 2,3 SPACES W BICYCLE PARKING PROVIDED=1 CLASS I.2 CLASS II GENERAL NOTES (CONT.): \ 0� 6, ,/A Idi'LD dSC BOUIRE TENTS: 31. ALL-WEATHER ACCESS WiLL BE PROVIDED TO ALL STRUCTURES WITHIN THIS DEVELOPMENT. ' _ ` uruua exuo.e MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACKS: FRONT-20'.REAR-25'. Sit 1i r ar.ro BUILDING HEIGHT-MAXIMUM HEIGHT SHALL NOT EXCEED 30 FEET,.a:-STORIES. 32. ASSURANCES IN THE FORM OF A RESTORATION CASH DEPOSIT IN THE AMOUNT OF ve.,40-- ���.1` \" r- _ Mei d. PROVIDED FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A GRADING AND/OR GRUBBING PERMIT TO L-��� n GU �� 11 =; ARANTE RESTORATION OF ALL DISTURBED AREAS ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTIONS -� 7. BASIS OF BEARING: BASED ON DOCKET 8178,PAGE 1966, 4-902 AND 13-603 OF THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED. 01] * ----- --- CENTERLINE OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD, G ''101'EO( SAID BEARING BEING: S 32T)9'07'E. 33. A TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT WILL BE SUBMITTED UNDER A SEPARATE COVER AND IS TO BE NU S � PART OF THiS DEVELOPMENT, I I I( 1 8. BASIS OF ELEVATION: ADOT DATUM BENCH MARK: BRASS DISK HEADWALL 70'RIGHT OF 34. DEVELOPER WILL INSTALL ALL LIGHTING IN CONFORMANCE TO 0R0 VALLEY LIGHTING CODE. .0 e J?° ior�r'"22 STATION 710+20 APPROXIMATELY 350'SOUTH OF NORTH 1/4 CORNER OF SEC.5,1.11S.,R.14 E. I_�",-,, '... .� �'.mxt/ 35. ALL NEW COMMERCIAL RELATED PROJECTS SHALL CONTRIBUTE ix OF THE PROJECT COST TOWARDS � \ /.”"''° (11�� I BENCHMARK ELEVATION: 2688.03. PUBUC ART PER SECTION 4-504F.THE DESIGN AND LOCATION SHALL RECEIVE A RECOMMENDATION • �)BY THE TOM OF ORO VALLEY ARTS ADVISORY BOARD PRIOR TO.PROJECT APPROVAL BY THE TOWN i�A� ___ i9. DEVELOPER WILL COVENANT TO HOLD THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY,ITS SUCCESSORS,AND COUNCIL THiS 1%PUBLIC ART PROVISION SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE GENERAL NOTES FOR THE ASSIGNS,HARMLESS IN THE EVENT OF FLOODING. DEVELOPMENT PLAN. THE PUBLIC ART FOR THiS PROJECT SHALL BE APPROVED PRIOR TO THE ....NJ..Delve 10. DRAINAGE WILL NOT BE ALTERED,DISTURBED OR OBSTRUCTED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF • APPROVAL OF THE BUILDING PERMIT. •nxe zlas,,,,sir. THE 0R0 VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL X. 7 ..0 4547-4Cf., n,'e2WL1/na'Vi&ace.,o /77�,9)LC•4',Ire 11. THE PROPOSED DRAINAGEWAYS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO APPROVED PLANS � ��'�T�I",7 4M/CJ<C��l�i��Ey,R9lt/E�T4�FYL�P0�B� LOCATION MAP PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY PERMITS FROM THE TOWN ENGINEER AND/OR BUILDING OFFICIAL • • BEING A PORTION OF SE P.OF SECTION 36 T 11 S,R.13 E,C.46.R.14. �\1 12. ACCESS ACROSS FLOOD PRONE AREAS TO BUILDING SITES WILL BE APPROVED BY THE TOWN TO.OF ORO VALLEY,PIMA COUNTY,ARIZONA. • ENGINEER AND SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DEVELOPER. 13. ON-SITE TRAVEL LANES DESIGNED FOR WB-50 VEHICLE.DESIGN SPEED EQUALS 15 MPH. 14. APPROVED IMPROVEMENT PLANS AND APPROVED ASSURANCES WILL BE REW1RED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS. LEGEND 15. ANY RELOCATION,MODIFICATION,ETC.OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND/OR PUBLICG IMPROVEMENTS NECESSITATED BY THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTS WILL BE AT NO EXPENSE TO THE PUBLIC. - ,� EXISTING 5'CONTOUR 16. THE FOLLOWING UTILITIES WILL PROVIDE SERVICE TO THIS DEVELOPMENT: `� -- EXISTING 1'CONTOUR A, POWER TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY EXISTING PAVEMENT AND CURB B GAS SOUTHWEST GAS CORPORATION 0 '. CI WATER ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY D SEWER PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT ---W--�`-- EXISTING WATERLINE E TELEPHONE U.S.WEST COMMUNICATIONS -S-�o'-- EXISTING SEWER F FIRE PROTECTION GOLDER RANCH FIRE SEPT. G CABLE TELEVISION JONES INTERCABLE /0 7riT�//t/ W ® NEW WATERLINE AND VALVE 17. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SERVED BY 0R0 VALLEY WATER UTILITY WHICH HAS BEEN r - 7e4,,‘ - R-"{� NEW SETVERLINEMIDMANHOLE DESIGNATED AS HAVING AN ASSURED 100 YEAR WATER SUPPLY BY THE DIRECTOR OF WATER DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARY (�- RESOURCES. 18. REQUIRED FiRE FLOW FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT IS 1.500 G.P.M. O.OSiYArI V - ADJACENT LOT LINE 1, 19. ONSITE SANITARY SEWERS EXCEPT PUBLIC SEWERS WITHIN PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS OR ---- ---- EASEMENT LINE RIGHTS-OF-WAY MALL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED,OPERATED,AND 0.te :1 roe.e12-,egg, g �O./!ti/145t1 -_� MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN t �.�.t°/�.�� SIB f 444,4EIO • INDICATES 1/2'IRON PIN TAGGED BY EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY PIMA COUNTY d`�" ^ a _XII .Q!.C.P/P-,!'AAP AN R.LS.TO 8E SET UPON WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT AT THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL OR PERFORMING OF dam=a^ COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. BUILDING PLANS. 20. ALL SEWERS WILL BE DESIGNED TO PROVIDE GRAVITY FLOW. SECT j0 V 1. INDICATES BRASS CAPPED SURVEY V v ��J,OA/ E� � (�)� �`� MONUMENT STAMPED+COMPLETION R.L.S. /., TTT Y TO BE SET UPON COMPLETION OF 21. ANY WASTEWATER DISCHARGED INTO THE PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS SHALL MEET ,+3' CONSTRUCTION. THE REQUIREMENTS OF INDUSTRIAL WASTE ORDINANCE(PIMA COUNTY ORDINANCE NO.1991- ...4•75' C.P. AREA(ac)Q2(cfs) QS(dal 010(cfs)0100(c7s) q FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT AS NOTED 740 AS AMENDED). 1 0.06 !.6 1.0 L0 6.0 ZE 0.54 0.6 1.2 1.7 3.5 (IRON PIN,BRASS CAP,ETC.) 22. A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT SHALL BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER 3E 0.20 0.1 0.3 0.5 1.1 IO DRAINAGE CONCENTRATION POINT MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT WHEN CONNECTION IS MADE TO A NEW OR EXISTING PUBLIC 4E ASYS 0,3 0.6 0.8 ,?S MANHOLE BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. 6E Q,�S 0.2 0.4 0.5 3 PC PIMA COUNTY STANDARD DETAIL NUMBER 23. THE PROPERTY OWNERS.HIS SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS AGREE TO: I.f 1 0.34 1.3 1.7 LO 3.1 1)KEEP ALL REQUIRED LANDSCAPED AREAS MAINTAINED IN A WEED FREE,TRASH FREE • `i/OA,OBd.C, -440✓E. �_ 2 0.03 0.0 0,1 0.1 0.2 CONDITION. .�. PROPOSED CONCRETE r 3 0.85 3,1 4.2 5.0 7.7 2)REPLACE ANY DEAD PLANT MATERIALS WITHIN 90 DAYS AND, 7' .1 Jed' . I t I 3)MAINTAIN THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IN PROPER WORKING ORDER. 15' < 15' I4 Q./$ /g *(47.56) EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION 24. A SOILS REPORT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED UNDER A SEPARATE COVER AND IS TO BE A PART OF N' .� �000. .97.56 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION THIS DEVELOPMENT, H.C. PROPOSED HANDICAPPED PARKING 25. THE SOILS ENGINEER OF RECORD OR OTHER REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE DETAIL t F.F.E. FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION WITH EXPERTISE IN THE AREA OF SOILS ENGINEERING SHALL CERTIFY,IN WRITING,THAT N.T.S. 4'OHM q✓ ALL SOILS OPERATIONS FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT WERE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STRIPE(TIP. a ATee, L SAfe-efAX0V/Off RECOMMENDATIONS AS SET FORTH IN THE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION BY W.T.I.,JOB NO. .L..39✓./OZO.,DATED/40,,EteL D,2000,AND ANY ACCEPTED AGGENDA/AMENDMENTS MADE O/ per ,•,-�`./ THERETO,SAID ENGINEER WILL FURTHER CERTIFY,iN WRITING,THAT ALL MATERIALS HANDICAP PARKING SIGN W/ UTIUZED ON THIS DEVELOPMENT ARE iN CONFORMANCE WITH THE ACCEPTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS.CERTIFICATIONS,IN WRITING,ARE TO BE RECEIVED BY THE TOWN VAN ACCESSIBLE PLATE PER ORO I • ENGINEER THE TOWN OF CR0 VALLEY PRIOR TO THE REQUEST FOR ANY BUILDING VALLEY SIGN CODE SEC.12-502 G / PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING c TYPIAGIIL> , P.C./C.O.T. STD. DETAILS: PERMITS AND/OR FINAL INSPECTION AND THE RELEASE OF ASSURANCES. /0 26. IN PLACE DENSITIES SHALL BE DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH U.B.C.STANDARD NO. (TIP.) (TYP,) 200 - CONCRETE SIDEWALK 70-2 IN PLACE DENSITIES SHALL NOT BE DETERMINED BY OTHER U.B.C.STANDARDS UNLESS 207 - WHEELCHAIR RAMP SPECIFIC WRITTEN APPROVAL IS OBTAINED FROM THE BUILDING OFFICIAL AND TOWN __ - 209 - CONCRETE CURB ENGINEER OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY. - TYPE 1(G) CONC.VERT'.CURB&GUTTER TOP DETAIL (TYP.' 12:1 11 TYPE 2 CONC.NERT.T2JRB 27, THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL CERTIFY,IN WRITING,THAT ALL - .: 211 - CONC.CURB NEW TO EXIST. IMPROVEMENTS,WHETHER PRIVATE OR PUBLIC,HAVE BEEN CONSTRUCTED,PLACED,INSTALLED. �=�� \`2 WHEEL .1/0 - QJbC' ETC.,IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE ACCEPTED PLANS FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT. ` CERTIFICATIONS,IN WRITING,ARE TO BE RECEIVED BY THE TOWN ENGINEER OF THE TOWN OF N TS Z/3 - �� OF ORO VALLEY PRIOR TO THE REQUEST FOR FINAL INSPECTION AND THE RELEASE OF I ASSURANCES. 7 28. A DRAINAGE REPORT HAS BEEN PREPARED AND SUBMITTED TO THE TO.OF ORO VALLEY UNDER SEPARATE COVER. 4'WHIT£ 29. A CONCEPT LANDSCAPE PLAN HAS BEEN PREPARED AND SUBMITTED TO THE TOWN OF ORO STRIPE(TA.) b Q VALLEY UNDER SEPARATE COVER, 1�.1 30. ACCEPTANCE CC THESE PLANS DOES NOT CONSTITUTE OR IMPLY ACCEPTANCE OF ANY OF THE "al _ \\\ FOLLOWING: .. .. • ((A))WALL(S),RETAINING OR OTHER T`rPE(S). t.. ..j. A.C. �\ (8)ANY REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCIURE(S). �' (C ANY EMBANKMENTS)WHOSE PRIMARY PURPOSE IS TO FUNCTION AS A RETENTION/ A.B.G. A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR: A. DETENTION STRUCTURE. ••I ;. - SEPARATE PLAN CHECK(S)AND PERMIT(5)ARE REWIRED,ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE .1/_ '''•y/'�'��' ri %!I ., COMPACTED RANCHO VISTOSO APPLICABLE CODES OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY. 1. e- e' .r PAV �yi sH,BCRAOE OWNER/DEVELOPER NEIGHBORHOOD 7, PARCEL I o ' TYPE A:C, &B.C. :47("t'CII/ . STANDARD HwQ.T.yz) 4- GOLDER RANCH FIRE DEPT. GOLDER RANCH FIRE STATION A HEAVY DUTY (C.OT./2) 6^ 3535 E. HAWSER ST. BEING A PORTION OF THE S.E. i/4 OF SECTION 36,HANDICAP PARKINGETAI TYpfCA AV TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST,Engineering Pecture g Surveying L FM-ENT SECTION ORO VALLEY, AZ 85737 o The Landscape Architecture Urhan Design, G doS.R.M, TOVM OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA�VLB N.T.S N.T.s. C/0 CHIEF JOHN FINK = [, Offices located in Tucson, Phoenix Los Vegas,one victor volley.Co • (520) 825-9001 • 4444 East 6roodwoy SCALE: AS SHOWN OV12-00-O�o n Group Tucson. Arizona PTnc (520)BBt-7460 FEBRUARY 21, 2000 Zel .5"-2/0o Cl, y a ti. W.L.B. JOB NO. 199071A-001-0105 SHEET 1 OF 2 7 N. • / W , , ..• \, ••• en \ / / \ /\ \\ ,!, / \\ �'C�N / �� / RANCHO VI S'fOSO / `, \, \\ `�y ,` T���,� �, / PARCEL H NEI GH80RHOOD 7 \, \ \`. 'Y1 \� / BK.46 M&P/PG.88 / „......1, �/l'_ 2. \ \♦ ' ' �♦ - -/\ �:44,1:111):, • / \ ` \ \` :.Ex \ / N !iV \ '/ • / N � n /, DKT.8425 PC.fl49 i 1 1 •� ` »1 .L_ / ,. ��_E- _I 1 \l\ ``` 71Y/Z� -J _ / W=/P7_PARCEL-7F . /,' \ 0 ��', / rw ram219-53-004N _ - ----%-r,�, litt \�`/ �,)� \' fie `� / / \ ' /By'l-, .'-ty6E-T ._ 1- - , � `�/ \\ . \ ``-aR'C S �� �`� / ,, ''Gtr.4,/1s46-e77,, ) ri• ' I' / / •/ ,'/Et6T�ufT `\ ��\ /,QS o \\\ / /4,! =7G, 2 / WM /I'' I 41 �'�;n, sa 1 ,/,, -II 1 + 1p ,41 _ �:• -� • ' '4 97.E -'34) WAPA ; 1 1/\` \t ,+ / 1/ 11 __/_ - / % ' 4t! /:fll�%' - •• �3 �..':: Imo`�,\� <� ' iIf BK.75 MISC REC PG.541 t t I / -- 9(p/ i 5 <i \� , : - 8K.75 MISC REC PG.364 \ . I I 1 I �,'_ !P 6` �� •-s,.•: ,, \ > ESMT.FOR ELECTRIC .. ' 1 1 j 1 / 6-' +. �•� -1$ LINES AND FACILITIES '`, \ `1 , r \_-� / • "• •�.,- \ . i i , \ t••••.../: I --- 4,, ,o' ki // 'r/ '' // I it / /'� �q /� ef= A �tT" 'F ��• �7J363 11.e :} � \\ \ \ • \• �_ ....;'11.:-..-:::&':—.. '-' - '77° \---- 97-0- -- -27 ---'" -- 1 i l �1)r ' t + �✓ot ! = ; �// 0 ' z/.yor +s s. ��— ? _�D; � Zr.-') /��i \ I I 1 I 1 /A,/ 51, Ik : / ,. C_- �+ r� � � a 1 G ` � 1 I / \le' ♦ t 4p sue.) \ \ s �- i / 1 Do°i �. F'� a rl, ,s1j-4,e,---"\Irs----- - r' /' I If . I,,, 11. ' '‘ 1 ' ' . Q e ti __.- ,-., f .1 ,ia‘ •-- ,' ,/,' /,•- , / / /' , 1 -,e- \ .., 4 ..4 1! .: / /J.. , ... N\ .. ... .* 0 •/‘ ".1 ' v re . .,..,,..,,,,,,,,,:. .. ....6 :. ;-,7.1'''f_..,i... '/I,_4,95.•.;_te 44)-: , .1.4..' ,1 \ \\ , I, ' fi if I 4-0 , , , , 0 . : 1 i . . ,.t3- 44. ,, - it':,,r•- . ,I,/ v -... _ - .. _ --_. \ •, III /' , f , /; 1 ,/ • \ /I / I /♦- i i / // ..0 , Ty- / 'J"' \� r r }J7l V'"t �/ �I �� \ r' 1 I , ' / , '(ili 1 ot i I ,' � 0 4L / 3, , /al f ' 1 OKj�A R\SN£5 ` t t 1,1�p('[y� \ ccA , \ , \ (‘-', + 7- T- Y 1 ' , i a? \ \ \ I l r '1,.'',/ 3 /, `� _ '\FIRE STATION ; " /� /I(^' \ , /(j/ 11, . \\ �l' l '' "�, to�� -BILK'-e� =GR9O�..'f. I1 /51 / G�sl�%7 // r� \\4- \ ' ; r T.E.P. PARC L\1 _ _ - G` 1, 1 l i \r 219-53-001 - -' 1, _ , v ,- -- 4R/' '`,/, )- .- ,,../-,-.-,_,I_/,-,.•',••S.- ,,/l,'4'-/,„/f'"_/',1/ /,,1/\//I/.1/7 7.',,''_\'',•‘'\/• 7// --/ III p 1 ` \ ' ' h T Ii \ \ \ UNE \\ �_\` _ T<% `C S9b f3� ► / , r , \ t \`\\'i ',l\\\ r/-S/ y r7,' 't/ ///gala /3GLA \I l l i ,'�i�,' .[� \\` ', :� / _ `\\ mob• i-` - 38 C —,' 1 , \ ,\I •( , ,r , ', / ' ' ' / V� -, 1 1 \�, \ 1 \ l I �1 N89•SY2 l ; -•' r/ /- / / -' / ' '---' s+ .,� 1 ' \ , \ 1 \ // -_ 169 17 '; ', / /, r r // ` \ , ► I`l i, ' _ i 7�iKNiNG \ 1 - 4 -- N-9.5-.1.?!r / _/ /;tG,..4--, 'n�_. I . rrrir \ Na✓N&'vr3 \ \ _ /r •• /• ,/.5.- / S./a' wLw91'ES�u1 •O.5. `��. J��� U �. / / \\/ 5 1/4 COR'SEC-36 i _. , , ,' ' - \ X ! I /' / / , / / .---- I F\ -- \ \ + / / / 1 (1:: I I \ + / 1/ I 1, --- A -��- j / A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR: \ ` G�l".. % BD,>r( �f�,, ,, ,'' / '--S RANCHO VI STOSOvi f / - 1 / / � 7Q NEIGHBORHOOD 7, PARCEL I r C'i /'`--'/ /' i l // i'i4'Os�'`�� °e �'- �_ �rvii„,,K:;1.5, " GOLDER RANCH FIRE STATION�' y' / /r/ l C �0 -�'�2" , l'221i52 BEING A PORTION OF THE S.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 36, ; 11,1:11\\N r,.�'\ / ! // ! I \ � TOWNSHIP11SOUTH, RANGE13EAST, a::: iii Engineering Planning Surveying O 20 40 60 �//� i I / ! / ( \` ♦\ ' �rx% G.&S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY,PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA The Lo g nearing cop i ArchPlanni Ur Su Design ( -- ' Offices located in Tucson,Phoenix ` \ �LB Los Vegas,and Victor Valley,Ca //r/ 1 / tl ! \ • gr SCALE R�INTZROVAL= 1' o ONA U. OV12-00-06 Group 4444 East Broadway / I ! 1 / _ FEBRUARY 21, 2000 REV:S//_2/00 a Tucson,Arizona (520)B81-74B0 / 1 I i I \ °i Inc �� / 1 / 1 / '��_ �'\` W.L.B.JOB NO, 199071A-001-0105 SHEET 2 OF 2 i TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: May 17,2000 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Bayer Vella, Senior Planner SUBJECT: OV12-00-06 ADDENDUM, GOLDER RANCH FIRE STATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WOODBURNE AVENUE 0.35 MILES WEST OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD BACKGROUND: Hunt & Caraway Architects and the WLB Group, representing the Golder Ranch Fire District, request approval of a Development Plan for a fire station within Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 7 Parcel I. The subject property is located approximately 0.35 miles west of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard, 0.2 miles north of Tangerine Road, and abuts the southern edge of Woodburne Avenue. The applicant is proposing an architectural design that will help insure compatibility with the residential context of the area. On May 9th, the Development Review Board voted unanimously to recommend approval of the project. A condition was added to enable reduction of the parking requirements by one space, in order to encourage additional landscaping. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval, subject to those modified conditions depicted in Exhibit A. SUGGESTED MOTIONS The Council may wish to consider one of the following motions: I move to approve OV 12-00-06, Golder Ranch Fire Station Development Plan, effective upon satisfaction of the attached conditions listed in Exhibit A attached herewith. OR I move to approve OV 12-00-06, Golder Ranch Fire Station Development Plan, effective upon satisfaction of the attached conditions listed in Exhibit A, attached herewith, and the following added conditions: OR I move to deny OV 12-00-06, Golder Ranch Fire Station Development Plan, finding that: i Attachments: Planru d Zoni Administrator 1. Revised Exhibit A—Conditions for Approval Comm 'ty Dev opment Director \\OV PZD\PZ1\OV\OV12\2000\12-00-06\TCReport.doc Town Manage EXHIBIT A OV 12-00-06 GOLDER RANCH FIRE STATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1. Section 9-107 of the OVZR must be strictly adhered to—unless specifically modified by the Town Council. In particular, the Development Plan and Landscape Plan must depict a landscape-parking island adjacent to the interior sidewalk. 2. Approval of the development plan shall be effective for two years, but may be extended upon reapplication and review by the staff and Council. 3. All communications equipment must be established in a manner to minimize visual impacts from neighbors to the north. 4. The Landscape Plan must be approved prior to issuance of any building or grading permits. 5. The development plan and the drainage concept plan are in conflict. 6. Construct detention facilities acceptable to the Town Engineer. Provide revised plans and drainage report indicating the method and design approved by the Town Engineer. The drainage addendum does not adequately address detention requirements. 7. Ten-percent reduction in the pre-developed flow shall be required. 8. Install the appropriate signage on Woodburne Avenue in accordance with the MUTCD. 9. Reduce the number of parking spaces to twenty-three. F:\ovNovi2\2000\12-00-06\TCReport2.doc MINUTES ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION MAY 17,2000 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION CALL TO ORDER 6:10 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Paul Loomis, Mayor Dick Johnson, Vice Mayor Fran LaSala, Council Member Wayne Bryant, Council Member(Arrived at 6:35 p.m.) Paul Parisi, Council Member (Arrived at 6:40 p.m.) MOTION: A MOTION was made by Vice Mayor Johnson and SECONDED by Council Member LaSala to go into Executive Session at 6:10 p.m. Motion carried, 3 —0. Mayor Loomis announced that Mr. George Garcia and Community Development Director Brent Sinclair would be present for Executive Session Item 1. EXECUTIVE SESSION The Executive Session was called for the following purpose: 1. Pursuant to ARS 38-431.03 (A)(3) Legal Advice regarding the Calle Loma Linda/Linda Vista Trail Access 2. Pursuant to ARS 38-431.03 (A)(3) Legal Advice regarding to Tortolita v. Town of Oro Valley Cause No. 328365 and related cases and matters 3. Pursuant to ARS 38-431.03 (A)(3) Legal Advice regarding IGA with Marana regarding Countryside Water Service Area MOTION: A MOTION was made by Council Member LaSala and SECONDED by Vice Mayor Johnson to go out of Executive Session at 6:58 p.m. Motion carried, 5 —O. RESUME REGULAR SESSION CALL TO ORDER 7:08 p.m. ROLL CALL Paul Loomis, Mayor Dick Johnson, Vice Mayor Paul Parisi, Council Member Fran LaSala, Council Member Wayne Bryant, Council Member • 05/17/00 Minutes, Council Regular Session 2 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Loomis led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS Town Manager Chuck Sweet reviewed the upcoming meetings. He also announced that the Town Hall offices would be closed Monday, May 29th due to the Memorial Day holiday. ORDER OF BUSINESS Mayor Loomis stated that Agenda Item#11 would follow Item #5. CALL TO AUDIENCE Karen Rogers, 1815 E. Starmist Place, thanked Melissa Shaw, Mayor Loomis, and Louise Harrison and all those who volunteered their time, energy, and/or financial support on the Save-a-Plant Program. She stated that with all their efforts and support, House Bill 2018 was passed. 1. CONSENT AGENDA MOTION: Vice Mayor Johnson MOVED to APPROVE the Consent Agenda as presented. Council Member LaSala SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —0. A. Minutes—5-3-00 (rescheduled for approval on 6-7-00) B. Resolution No. (R) 00-40 Authorizing and Approving a Contract with WestLand Resources, Inc. for Engineering Design and Construction Period Services for Water Plant 13 One Million Gallon Potable Water Reservoir in the amount of$188,800 C. Resolution No. (R)00-41 Authorizing the Oro Valley Police Department to apply to the Governor's Office of Community and Highway Safety for grant funds to purchase a SMART(Speed Monitoring Awareness Trailer), Radar Units and an Accident Investigations Measuring System (AIMS) to further public safety within the boundaries of the Town of Oro Valley D. Resolution No. (R)00-42 Award of Contract for Project No. DPW 99/00- 23 Town Hall Exterior Refinishing (11000 N. La Canada Drive) to Wiese Painting Contractors in the amount of$19,900 E. Resolution No. (R)00-43 Approving and Authorizing Staff to Contract with DMA Engineering to develop a Feasibility Study for the Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects (Funding for this will be reimbursed from the approved PAG PDAF Grant titled "Multi-Use Lane Safety Improvements Feasibility Study A" for$20,000 F. Resolution No. (R)00-44 Accepting a license agreement from El Conquistador Hotel Associates dba El Conquistador Country Club for the 05/17/00 Minutes, Council Regular Session 3 installation and maintenance of golf cart paths and landscaping within the La Canada Drive right-of-way G. Resolution No. (R)00-45 Award of Contract for the Town Annual Maintenance Contract H. OV12-97-08A Approval of revised Final Plat Vistoso Ridge, Lots 36— 121 Located south of Moore Road approximately 'A mile east of the La Canada Drive Extension I. Resolution No. (R)00-46 Approval of 5 year agreement with Pima Association of Governments (PAG) for Summer Youth Art Project J. Purchase of SELECTRON Interactive Voice Response System (IVR) 2. PRESENTATION OF CERTIFICATES OF APPRECIATION TO SAVE-A- PLANT VOLUNTEERS Melissa Shaw, Planner II, recognized and thanked residents and students who volunteered their time and efforts to the Save-a-Plant Program. Mayor Loomis presented Certificates of Appreciation to the following: Karen Rogers, Louise Harrison, Bill Adler, Sylvia Lyndsey,Natalya Sinclair, Kari Treadwell, Ernie Shaffer, Diana Lopez, and Wesley Six. Mayor Loomis thanked all those who worked on the Save-a-Plant Program. He stated that it was a significant program and with the efforts and support of the Town staff, volunteers, the Arizona Department of Agriculture, and the League of Cities and Towns, the resolution was past by the State House and Senate. 3. PRESENTATION OF SPECIAL OLYMPICS AWARDS TO MEMBERS OF THE ORO VALLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT Mayor Loomis and Lieutenant Charlie Lentner presented Certificates of Appreciation to the following Police Department employees for their hard work and dedication to raising money and public awareness for the athletes of Special Olympics Arizona: Sergeant Joe Corona, Sergeant Doug Reed, Detective Herb Williams, Officer Keith Tucker, Carlene Kron,Diane Little, and Margaret Fischer. 4. APPOINTMENT OF MEMBERS TO THE FIRE ADVISORY BOARD AND APPROVAL OF THE BOARD'S SCOPE OF WORK MOTION: Council Member Parisi MOVED to APPROVE the recommended appointments to the Oro Valley Fire Advisory Board with terms to be effective for six months commencing on May 17, 2000. (Members: John Barbee, Lonnie Berry, Allen Cook, Ron Koslowski, James McCormick, Arlene Ozburn, and Richard Tracy) He also moved to approve the Scope of Work for the Fire Advisory Board. (Scope of Work will be to study the following items: Oro Valley Evaluation of Emergency and Non- Emergency Services, Fire Advisory Committee and Citizen's Focus Group recommendations for Oro Valley Fire & EMS Strategic Plan, and Oro Valley Strategic 05/17/00 Minutes, Council Regular Session 4 Plan for Fire and Emergency Medical Services.) Vice Mayor Johnson SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —0. 5. WATER UTILITY COMMISSION 2000 ANNUAL REPORT MOTION: Vice Mayor Johnson MOVED to ACCEPT the Oro Valley Water Utility Annual Report dated May 2000 as presented and that the Town Council schedule a Joint Study Session with the Water Utility Commission on May 31, 2000. Council Member Bryant SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5- 0. 11. AUTHORIZATION OF THE ACQUISITION OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT ACT (SAWRSA) EFFLUENT—BUREAU OF RECLAMATION Town Manager Chuck Sweet reported that for several years the Town of Oro Valley has partnered with several jurisdictions to evaluate different options on how to preserve ground water. Options include direct delivery of effluent for golf course irrigation; direct delivery of CAP (Central Arizona Project)water for golf course irrigation; delivery of treated CAP for consumption; recharge options for both effluent and/or CAP; or any combination thereof. He explained that staff became aware of the availability of 2,250 acre-feet of effluent through Southern Arizona Water Rights Settlement Act (SAWRSA.) Mr. Eric Holler, Bureau of Reclamation, addressed the Council. He reviewed the Southern Arizona Water Rights Settlement Act stating that it was a result of a 1975 lawsuit by the United States on behalf of the Tohono O'odham against entities that used groundwater in the Santa Cruz basin. Mr. Holler reported that the amount of effluent owned by the Secretary of the Interior amounts to 28,200 acre-feet. When this is factored into the effluent split,the City of Tucson currently owns 52%, the Secretary of the Interior(under SAWARSA) owns 42%, and the County owns 6%. He explained that the percentages will change over time due to the fact that SAWARSA's effluent is a fixed amount of the total effluent that is produced. Mr. Holler further reviewed provisions of SAWARSA. MOTION: Council Member Bryant MOVED to AUTHORIZE the submittal of the proposal from the Town of Oro Valley to the U.S. Department of the Interior for the long term lease and/or purchase of 2,250 acre feet of effluent rights as outlined in the draft letter, Version 3A. Council Member LaSala SECONDED the motion. AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION: Mayor Loomis asked that the words"and/or credits"be added to the motion to follow "effluent rights." Council Member Bryant and Council Member LaSala agreed to the amendment. Motion as amended, carried 5 — 0. 05/17/00 Minutes, Council Regular Session 5 6. OV12-00-03 RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 3, PHASE 1 PRELIMINARY BLOCK PLAT FOR FOUR LOTS ON EITHER SIDE OF THE COMMERCE LOOP ALIGNMENT SOUTH OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD (CONTINUED FROM MAY 3,2000) Planning and Zoning Administrator Bryant Nodine reviewed the preliminary block plat for OV 12-00-03, Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 3, Phase 1. He stated that the applicant has met with neighbors from Catalina Shadows and Palisades Point to address their concerns. Mr. Nodine reviewed a map of the project and reported that lots, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, are zoned Campus Park Industrial and lot 8 is designated as Open Space and Recreation area. Mr.Nodine also reviewed the following: • Drainage • Grading and fill • Native Plant Salvage Plan and Restoration Plan • Dust Control and Valley Fever • Noise • Erosion Control • Hydrology Report • Developable Area Trade for Open Space Encroachment Mr.Nodine stated that staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plat, the Grading "concept"Plan, and the Native Plant Salvage Plan for Phase 1. Discussion followed regarding the amount of water needed for dust control, monitoring and possible liability of air quality and dust control, embankment protection, and the applicant keeping a definite communication link with the nearby Homeowners' Association. Mayor Loomis recessed the meeting at 8:12. The meeting resumed at 8:25 p.m. Charles Hulsey, The WLB Group, representing the applicant Vistoso Partners, reviewed the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development(PAD). He also addressed the following issues and concerns as presented by the neighbors: • 100 Year Water Adequacy Study • Buffers • Dust Control, Valley Fever • Riparian Ordinance,Native Plant Salvage Plan, Bird habitat • Grading, engineered fill, stockpile, and reseeding of area Discussion followed regarding a schedule for moving dirt, water demands and possible violation of water draw down. 05/17/00 Minutes, Council Regular Session 6 Mayor Loomis opened the floor for public comment. The following residents expressed their concerns regarding grading, fill, water issues, impact to wildlife, haul road, building in flood plains, and the safety and health of citizens: Karen Rogers, 1815 E Starmist Place Patty Estes, 11700 N. Joi Drive Hector Conde, 14040 N. Lobelia Way Bob Bischoff, 1864 E. Starmist Place Further discussion followed regarding: • Water usage and potential for renewable water sources • Evaporation of water forming crust on dirt which stabilizes dirt • Engineered fill verses stockpiled dirt and attempt to minimize any loose dirt • Soil sampling and compacting requirements • Hydro-seeding Mayor Loomis explained that the plan to move dirt from Neighborhood 3 to Neighborhood 4 was identified in the original planning days of the Rancho Vistoso PAD and the development of Tangerine Road. It was proposed and approved by the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) at that time. He explained that the amount of dirt that would be moved and stockpiled would be identified in the Grading Plan which will be dependent upon the final survey and accompanying plans as required by staff recommended conditions. Mayor Loomis asked that a condition be added to Exhibit "A" that the final Grading Plan be forwarded to Council for their review and approval. MOTION: Vice Mayor Johnson MOVED to APPROVE OV 12-00-03, Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 3,Native Plant Salvage Plan, the Phase 1 Grading, and Phase 1 of the Preliminary Plat, effective on the date of satisfaction of attached conditions listed in Exhibit "A" including the additional conditions that the final Grading Plan be forwarded to Council for their review and approval and that a formal arrangement be established to keep the Homeowners' Associations informed of the progress of the development. Council Member Parisi SECONDED the motion. AMENDMENTS TO THE MOTION: Council Member LaSala asked to add that the Town of Oro Valley be indemnified from all violations,penalties,notices and citations that result from any violations from State, Local, or Federal Air Quality Regulations. He also asked to add as a condition that the open space trade would be the area to the south of the road from Catalina State Park. Mayor Loomis asked that an amendment be added specifying that the re-seeding take place as each phase is completed. Vice Mayor Johnson and Council Member Parisi agreed to the amendments. DISCUSSION: Council Member LaSala stated that even though there are concerns, he had no doubt that the project would be done in a "classy" way. Council Member Bryant stated that he would not support the project for reasons relating to water issues, health concerns, etc. Exhibit"A" 05/17/00 Minutes, Council Regular Session 7 1. Drainage Report a) The drainage concept plan shall be revised to match the preliminary plat. b) Nationwide permit 14 from the US Army Corp. is no longer issued. The engineer shall contact the US Army Corp. for direction how to proceed. Provide the Town with copies of all written communication from the Army Corp. c) The final plat will not be scheduled for Town Council until an approvable drainage report for phase 1 has been reviewed and approved by the Town Engineer. Other comments will follow pending our review of the drainage report for phase 1 and the master report for all of Neighborhoods 3 and 4. d) A floodplain use permit (FUP)shall not be issued until the CLOMR report has been approved by the Town and Pima County, and Pima County has permitted issuance of the FUP. e) A FUP shall be required to be in force until the LOMR is approved by FEMA. 2. Native Plant Salvage Plan a) Provide a restoration plan for areas outside future development areas in Neighborhood 4 to restore the riparian area and areas impacted by grazing cattle and to create a buffer between the future development and the Big Wash riparian area. This plan will be reviewed and accepted by staff prior to salvage within Neighborhood 4. b) Change General Note #5 to indicate that all plants salvaged from Neighborhood 4 will be used in the above restoration plan. c) Field inspection prior to commencement of salvage operations will determine the salvageability of significant vegetation within areas proposed for grading. Any of these plants determined to be salvageable will be salvaged. 3. Preliminary Plat(PP) (Zoning Code section references are shown) a) All Sheets • On the title block for each sheet, delete reference to Neighborhood 4 and list only the lots that pertain to Phase I. • On sheets 2-11 G, correct the OV number to be OV 12-00-03, and show the latest revision date. • T he 100-year flood limits for all drainage-ways exceeding 50 CFS in a 100-year event are to be delineated. • 4-305-E-1d; show all 100-year street flows at critical points. • 4-305-E-4; the 100-year street flows must contained within the curbs. • Sheet 1 of 11; • Note 1, include only those areas associated with phase 1 • Note 3, the total number of lots is 6. • Note 4; add the information from note 36 then delete note 36. • Note 16; include just the miles of public streets in phase 1 only. • Note 30 the correct soils report number is 2920JM073-1. • Delete note 37. • In the location map and the project overview map show Street B and F aligned. 05/17/00 Minutes, Council Regular Session 8 ■ ON the project overview map replace the Phase I label for Neighborhood 4 with "Fill Area" b) Sheet 3 of 11, show the relocation of the Trico easement on lot 7 and in the proposed right-of-ways. c) Sheet 5 of 11, Is the proposed sewer extension on lot 5 public or private?If public show a sewer easement. The regional detention basin line is in error; the southern boundary shall be the north boundary of the drainage channel. A 10-ft access easement shall be required for the channel. d) Sheet 7 of 11, correct the delineation of the regional detention basin. e) Delete sheet 8 from the phase 1 PP. f) Sheet 9, delete the agreed on areas from the grading operation. g) Sheet 10, add another detail to the sheet that shows the proposed bank protection, 20- ft maintenance road and the normal cross section of the proposed road, maintenance access down into the wash shall be provided. Provide a revised cross section for Discovery Way that includes 5-ft bike lanes and 4-ft sidewalks on each side of the road. h) Sheet 11 a, Show the agreed to boundary for phase 1. Provide ties from section corners to Phase I and the boundary closure calculations. i) Delete sheet 11 b from the phase 1 PP. j) Sheet 11 c, correct this data based on the review of the paving plans. k) Sheet 11 d & e, correct the floodplain limits per discussions with David, label the FEMA floodplain study area and the corresponding water surface elevations. 4. Rancho Vistoso PAD a) Small areas of greater than 25% slope in lots 2 and 3 may be graded as long as equal areas of developable areas are exchanged as open space. b) The southern area of Neighborhood 4, up to 250' from the proposed southern access, will be designated as the primary receipt area for all proposed open space encroachment in Neighborhood 3 and 4. c) Label all areas of open space and 25% slope encroachment within Phase I and the areas that are proposed for exchange. Include all areas within Phase I and delete all outside Phase I from the open space encroachment table. Recalculate encroachment and exchange areas and revise Note#34 accordingly. d) Remove the area of open space encroachment southwest of Discovery Way on Sheet #3 from the gradeable area. 5. Prior to approval of the grading and improvement plans and issuance of a grading permit for fill in Neighborhood 4: a) Submit documentation that the fill along Big Wash will be placed no closer than 40' to the limits of the PAD designated developable area. b) Submit a dust control plan for review by both the Town and PCDEQ and acceptance by the Town. c) Submit an erosion control plan for acceptance by the Town. d) Submit a letter from the Corps indicating that all 404 issues have been addressed. e) Work with Game and Fish to develop a plan to minimize impacts on raptors. This plan must be accepted by the Town. f) A floodplain use permit shall be required (see#1 above). 05/17/00 Minutes, Council Regular Session 9 6. Any revisions to the preliminary plat approved by Council must be submitted on a revised preliminary plat prior to submittal of the final plat. Motion as amended carried, 3 —2 with Council Member Bryant opposed and Council Member Parisi abstaining. Mayor Loomis recessed the meeting at 9:32 p.m. The meeting resumed at 9:42. 7. CONSIDERATION OF CALLE LOMA LINDA/LINDA VISTA TRAIL ACCESS Community Development Director Brent Sinclair reported that staff is looking into options and solutions for trail access for the Calle Loma Linda/Linda Vista Trail. He stated that staff recommends continued negotiations with the property owner of the 18- acre parcel near Calle Loma Linda/Linda Vista for the northern 60 feet of the property. He stated that this could be in the form of an easement or acquisition of the piece of property in title. He stated that this would provide immediate access for equestrian and trail users. Mr. Sinclair explained that if the Town acquires the section of property, staff would work with Steve Anderson of Pima County Parks and Recreation and other resources to insure the betterment and safety of the trail. Discussion followed regarding the possibility of condemnation, possible acquisition of a larger amount of property (northern triangle of property,) and approaching the trail access with a sense of urgency and liability issues. Mayor Loomis opened the floor for public comment. The following citizens addressed the Council regarding trail access and future planning, possible acquisition of the larger piece of property to provide a safe area for equestrians, bikers, hikers, and keeping the access safe and open. Diane Judge, 1777 W. Sunkist Road Mike Czap, 14510 N. Swan Road Joy Remer, 3618 E. Thornapple MOTION: Vice Mayor Johnson MOVED to AUTHORIZE staff to negotiate for the purchase of the northern 60 feet of the Schwebel property as dedicated easement or in-fee title, and to authorize staff to aggressively continue to negotiate with the owner for additional trail access and to report back to the Town Council at the June 21st meeting with the status and if things have not progressed, to re-evaluate legal options. Council Member LaSala SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —0. MOTION: Council Member Bryant MOVED to ADJOURN. Motion failed, 1 —4. 05/17/00 Minutes, Council Regular Session 10 8. PUBLIC HEARING —ORDINANCE NO. (0)00-17 OV8-00-01 GOLDER RANCH FIRE STATION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WOODBURNE AVENUE 0.35 MILES WEST OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD Community Development Director Brent Sinclair reported that Golder Ranch Fire District has proposed to locate a fire station within Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 7, Parcel I. He explained that the site area is 1.23 acres with the proposed structure being 6,900 square feet. The zoning on the property is C-1. Mr. Sinclair stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the request for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) with the conditions listed in Exhibit "A." Tamara Caraway, architect, representing the Golder Ranch Fire District, stated that a review process has been completed and conditions have been addressed. Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. There being no speakers, the public hearing was closed. Discussion followed regarding possible concerns regarding traffic and sirens. (These concerns are addressed in the conditions as listed in Exhibit "A.") In response to a question from Mayor Loomis, Town Engineer Bill Jansen reported that the only traffic light in the area will be the signal currently approved for the intersection of Tangerine Road and First Avenue. He also explained that the traffic signals would be pre-wired for emergency strobes. MOTION: Council Member Parisi MOVED to recommend approval of Ordinance No. (0)00-17, OV8-00-01, Golder Ranch Fire District Conditional Use Permit with the conditions listed in Exhibit "A". Exhibit A 1. All conditions depicted within Section 9-107 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised must be strictly adhered to unless specifically modified by the Town Council. 2. Emergency sirens may only be utilized when traffic conflicts exist along Woodburne Avenue. Otherwise, sirens on vehicles shall not be activated until emergency vehicles reach the nearest arterial street. 3. The building height, including mechanical equipment, antennae, or associated communications equipment must not exceed a total of 30 feet in height and two stories. 4. All communications equipment must be established in a manner to minimize visual impacts from neighbors to the north. 5. Establish landscaping that abuts the sidewalk within the parking area in order to comply with Section 9-107092) of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised. Revise the site Plan and Development Plan accordingly. 6. Prior to issuance of a grading permit,provide a letter of approval from Pima County establishing approval of the encroachments on the two on-site sewer easements. • 05/17/00 Minutes, Council Regular Session l l Council Member LaSala SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —0. 9. OV12-00-06 GOLDER RANCH FIRE STATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WOODBURNE AVENUE 0.35 MILES WEST OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD MOTION: Council Member LaSala MOVED to APPROVE OV 12-00-06, Golder Ranch Fire Station Development Plan, effective upon satisfaction of the conditions as listed in Exhibit "A". Exhibit "A" 1. Section 9-107 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised must be strictly adhered to unless specifically modified by the Town Council. In particular,the Development Plan and Landscape Plan must depict a landscape-parking island adjacent to the interior sidewalk. 2. Approval of the Development Plan shall be effective for two years, but may be extended upon reapplication and review by the staff and Council. 3. All communications equipment must be established in a manner to minimize visual impacts from neighbors to the north. 4. The Landscape Plan must be approved prior to issuance of any building or grading permits. 5. The Development Plan and the Drainage Concept Plan are in conflict. 6. Construct detention facilities acceptable to the Town Engineer. Provide revised plans and drainage report indicating the method and design approved by the Town Engineer. The drainage addendum does not adequately address detention requirements. 7. Ten percent reduction in the pre-developed flow shall be required. 8. Install the appropriate signage on Woodburne Avenue in accordance with the MUTCD. 9. Reduce the number of parking spaces to twenty-three (23). Council Member Parisi SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 - 0. 10. RESOLUTION NO. (R)00-47 CONSENTING TO THE ATTEMPT TO THE INCORPORATION OF THE VILLAGE OF CASAS ADOBES Town Attorney Dan Dudley recommended continuing consideration of Resolution No. (R)00-47, Consenting to the Attempt to the Incorporation of the Village of Casas Adobes, until a status conference is held by the Court. He explained that it is currently unclear what direction the Court might take. MOTION: Vice Mayor Johnson MOVED to TABLE indefinitely Agenda Item #10, the "Consent to the attempt to incorporate the Village of Casas Adobes" until the completion of the status conference. Council Member LaSala SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 — 0. 05/17/00 Minutes, Council Regular Session 12 12. EXPLORATION WITH THE TOWN OF MARANA REGARDING A POSSIBLE INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT REGARDING A PORTION OF THE COUNTRYSIDE WATER SERVICE AREA LYING WITHIN THE TOWN OF MARANA MOTION: Council Member LaSala MOVED to DIRECT the Town Attorney to proceed as recommended in Executive Session. Vice Mayor Johnson SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 — 0. TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT No report. ENGINEER'S REPORT No report. FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPORT No report. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S REPORT No report. POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT No report. WATER UTILITY DIRECTOR'S REPORT Interim Water Utility Director Shirley Seng reported that Alan Forrest, the new Water Utility Director, would start on June 7th. She also stated that it has been a pleasure working with Council. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS Council Member LaSala reported that he taught Mayor Loomis how to play tennis in approximately fifteen minutes in order for the Mayor to play in the Celebrity Tennis Tournament held at the Sheraton El Conquistador. He stated that the Mayor played approximately thirty-two games and he did very well. Council Member Parisi stated that he ran with the Oro Valley Police on May 4th for the Special Olympics. He stated that he passed off the torch in the run and it was symbolic, as he is now passing the torch off to the new council members. He thanked all those who participated in the democratic process and he felt that the community had a competent 05/17/00 Minutes, Council Regular Session 13 team to lead the Town into the future. He said that he is willing to serve the community in whatever capacity the Council and citizens would allow. Vice Mayor Johnson commended Council Member Parisi for his service and commitment to the Town. Council Member Bryant stated that he enjoyed serving on the Council over the past year. He stated that guidelines have been set for water, impact fees have been implemented, and work on renewable water resources continues, so much has been accomplished. CALL TO AUDIENCE Bill Adler, 10720 N. Eagle Eye Place, spoke in support of volunteers being used in the Town's departments to help alleviate the strain on the budget. He also stated that he felt that the suggested criteria being recommended by the Planning and Zoning Administrator for Rancho Vistoso Neighborhoods 3 and 4 for open space encroachment should be reviewed by Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission. Once the criteria was scrutinized it could be considered for adoption as a formal policy to help end "argumentative backs and forths." ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Vice Mayor Johnson MOVED to adjourn at 10:35 p.m. Council Member Bryant SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 — 0. Respectfully submitted, (N)_ Roxana Garrity,Deputy De ut Town C1eAt I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the regular session of the Town of Oro Valley Council of Oro Valley, Arizona held on the 17th day of May, 2000. I further certify that the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present. Dated this o.Y day of ��� ,2000. Kathry E. Cuvelier, CMC Town Clerk 1Po_EY qR/ OHO lft7 2 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • Planning and Zoning • Building Safety 11000 N.La Canada Drive,Oro Valley,AZ 85737•(520)229-4800•Fax(520)742-1022 ♦ • Parks and Recreation A A' 680 W.Calle Concordia,Oro Valley,AZ 85737•(520)229-5050•Fax(520)797-2202 Pr, QIN August 17,2000 Gary Grizzle& Steve Oliviro WLB Group 4444 East Broadway Tucson,AZ 85711 Re: Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 7 Parcel I Golder Ranch Fire Station Landscape and Native Plant Preservation Plans(0V12-00-06) Dear Gary&Steve, At their regular meeting of August 8,2000,the DRB voted unanimously by a majority vote of 7-0 to approve the Landscape Plan and NPPP for the subject parcel located in Neighborhood 7I. The Town Council will consider the project on Sept. 13,2000. Please note the Sept.6 regular Council meeting was canceled. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Bayer Vella Senior Planner Attached,Exhibit A xc: Brent Sinclair,Community Development Director Bryant Nodine,Planning&Zoning Administrator OV File Paul Nzomo,Public Works F:\ov\ov12\2000\12-00-06\LP DRB action report.doc ey.c,•( Proposal to Golder Ranch Fire District For RANCHO VISTOSO FIRE STATION Public Art Project August 2000 Sagebrush Design 3933 E. 29TH Street Suite 501 Tucson, Arizona 85711 (520) 514-1983 4 Project: To design and produce a series of full color mosaics of decorative art. Highlighting the art will be symbols and elements unique to fire fighting tools and paraphenalia. In addition the mosaic will also feature desert creatures and southwest motifs. Size: There will be four mosaic panels, each 3 feet x 3 feet in size. Each is contained within a steel frame understructure, anchored into a masonry wall adjacent to the front entrance. Mosaic: The mosaic encompasses a full color range including gold metallics and silver toned tile, standard grout,with a protective finish coating. The steel understructure and framed edging will be powder painted similar to the exterior accent color of the firehouse structure. Sketch: A layout of the mosaic is included with this proposal. A finished half size model detailed drawing will be submitted for approval within 45 days of the approved agreement. The finished project will be ready for installation within 120 days of project approval date according to the production schedule as follows. Timeline: Proposal agreement signed approximately September 15, 2000 Half size detailed model rendering approximately November 1 Finished mosaic panels completed approximately March 15 Mosaic installation approximately April 15 Cost: Total costs including Town approval process and installation $8,500. Payment: 1/3 upon contract signing. 1/3 upon 50%mosaic completion 1/3 upon mosaic installation `—. 8 z oo For Sagebrus Design Date Matthew Moutafis . `‘f 5 7,......-//://._GU Fo der Ranch Fire District / / Date ief John Fink __---,--, -, -------- ri \ ---. ../\1,0 . ' RADIUS MORTAR 7 / GAP WITH WATER / ,-- REPELLANT ,, ,.._ ---- -119x8ex+6 GREY INTEGRAL COLOR SAND BLAST G.M.U. OP - •0 h 11 Plir 41111.0. P • •P E5x8x16 INTEGRAL COLOR FOUNDERS 0". 0 FINISH G.M.U. _ 1 .1.4 0 :0 0 ` 1.0 - I ,9 N- $ 11 :0 __---- SEE STRUCTURAL FOR WALL REINFORCING AS REQUIRED ° 0 :. I' 0 0 .1. 0 GROUT SOLID BELOW FINISH GRADE. 0 ri 0 - -.0 F.G. 1 1=1 1 LEI 1 d 1 1 1=1 1 IL-_- . SEE STRUCTURAL — DRAWINGS FOR FOOTING .' . • i'I .• - l• AND STEM CONSTRUCTION : •4."1 /.: •A i •• A•- -• •.. . \-- NALL SECTION 0 LEFT ELEVATION SCALE : 3/4".I'-0- , / 5/_//..2) I,2 ;•-A/.;1 1/4f4-.•''---' ( --',-i'_.] V11-;77,/ /.t- __. .. ,,- / ,.-- ..!e2.:, -Z'i 1-,: :."''';-• )' 1;:V /•••' :'-'/" lc-- ---- "- I 2 / 1 P 1 I..,/::-.-:-) ".. I :i if:,-',:i ."t.) iiii I I111IlIlIl111111IllI1I1II [ IIIIIIIlillilllllllllllllllllfill ! IIi11fIII1111rI11111 TOW A.F.F. -_ ElEl] L IIIIII III II[ II III III III I LLLL l Ill I _ 1 FIN.FLR. / 4P-6" f L4" I'-4" 6 44'-2„ LEFT SIDE ELEVATION W/SITE WALL SHOT G ` SCALE 3/16. II [171llllllllllIll [ I1111I llllll111f111IlIfIII I111I [llllllflllllllliiIlll11111 [ 11 _r TOW 2'-8"A.F.F. ---111 III III III III Ili III III III 1 1 Ill 1 O'-O" _ I I I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 l I I I I I 1 l FIN.FLR. /J( 41'-6" � / 4" 44'-2" I'-4" LEFT SIDE ELEVATION IN/ SITE INAU_ SHO$ G ` SCALE:3/16'= . . ,.:4. ..,t1 .24.1 -.... :**.i,\-- `---• I A'•• . ,, . 'sir i z . - — ---- --.. , • 1 e , 1.7,—w.-...„_'J..s ay a•k.12..-. IVVIIIII1,fr. LI I t i kilikVitlivw._ 8Wiril,-'...:-- . a' 4. seass...innet.22.....17,-." • 1 dr ,',.14'.ril"n" ,".....;: ,,4t4., 11111111, •,. ,Alige011.,4 viliiiiIPMBEIIIIIIVIlleitli... weemmaSINSPS:......7.,_!:4-.1.........l ' .• 1 . ir.g..... .-.- ...--.-. 11 't I .- ,....... . ,.........., i -__.........,,,,,,,...,:f‹,,,,,, ,_,._.-... -:,:„.i...,?.,,,,,,:---4.2e5-. ...22..__.:-__,,priit..v.-0,....t,-,...-..,-;,--AL. `',,*'A;*...:.0-.-,'''''.' '..r.'''... ' _..fs' ''t- - . 4-•*4.1,,.. ',''' ",• t'''''''-' ,,,,:...,.! .... —__ /Inv —__ ....- . -,, ..... ''''----- 01/ 1 , „.1, i • i \ - 4 ' -'•1 - ,2"' ------:L"T* \\ fii -•• _-,' .---;:.-- ; 2- .-tiv-#.> i , , ...„,,4.A.,)r_., -10 l 7 I 5-1-65C,, f-ik::.E..,:t __STA-.1145i0Filo/0,160 / SCALE/,..„....z/ APPROVED BY. 4........ DRAWN II, DATE i , ) ) /414-- /743 Af,AV007;40S REvISED **,.... . r. A-,I C,-:7sAit:::. Aec.:•.-7 4-ii..112.44.../zoAe-z.- .,„,... , ...., DRAWING NUMBER r. 2.(,-)177,74.1 ,P1'55.5 • ----- -, • . ,,,a.:3-,- -.7 ..--_,-:- ,- -.- .T .- • . ..•,1;,.'tli!..4'z •' . _-- '''''---•,.,........-,;e-,.1--,.,_/„.1,4.-iii-v_i"'':.Pr -\r-4,,,'...3c-/ ,-.. ."--- ...1 . . = -, ..,,La'-:,---,.? 1' tt,- •-'- - 1 : -7.-- -.......,. _. • . , 44,0 , c • ' '(.'1;V -1..":,...? i . - w. -- ----. ) 1 ; •, ,I - , 'w,.-- ' -,--,4v'''nao't,---sr its.1 , .-1112.-- --,....__.:..,,,-• -..,----1..,:,-.-L, : 4,-. --.,___ — 7—- -- • ", •i •4 rd-..---...4_ 4-4 ...A.S :is ,„'-.,„ .'- : • . s --r-,,- i• ,; Al' i..'•,`KII.1 -1,-,- --. 4 ... -,• 4"r."---:.,--iirr -,.; •1 4--t wle•:,,i..-kk., ....Emil! - _-i p.;:, ;1., r/ ill ii ., _ ,,,,_ ..--. ,t,,--___ ,...,_ e, ,i t i . 11 iIts 1K,VII!. ./4.4,---1. ., ','I _--- -* i-1':4"C*.iii.'t7 11 jp. ••="'1:,,utt -i.i,t..."'--==•:-.,i----...—"---': - ,-,k' It'; >I •.. • - -Trk,,',E,','`rr—re-,', ').- r- • if.,) - .1-.„ ' I'-, -1-... ' •iii,1,-..,/..,b .47 ,:_.; k r ,%-., ,.. ..s i e- . - - • li il' '' '. . ,— _ i: t*;• ' ~—-*qt.: '_ „,....' .... ,.• , '- 11 / 1 1' i -..• ,, .s'' mil ..., 4„,„,. , ./, :-. go•-•,.,, 'i '.:-...-• t.,.,.ii. , • ••0.' ' ..4.. 4....•4 riii-.„ ,,,,,, ...,,, „ . -ii-Th ,--,---. ".. i Niii.„k .4' IL ..,"'A:"''. ...„i-f "i''',1 , NA, ,.. ,, ,.„....,,I•IN: .J.. Aib,:....-. • .., i -- ---- --• i E,-_,— :.-7'r ... _......- __...-- 4 1 10 i — .,m.r--..,.., li-h— • .--.,—.......,..........,........ ,. I \.N , , .• _„,. .N.._, ...., -, ---.:., CCN ' ,,1. it!-;.i, , ,'-, :.', A et'XiC i Si.;Ve A I i11, . ,.•4 • '*..- ,.....4.- -__ l:4-fX �. '' :'`- 8�S\,•„ :ire • =4 :I! --,. I! -'` ' , �' `ra i f •• `t t► K;� - '. �R - yiri; ;i "1�'t i '• , • •I' `�S - mot � ,� S• l ; , .„4, , S> -;..r....„_ _,_„g,, �q', 'it.i:l•j [FY 1 V .3 ti � QQ.! I i l .4- Aga.■ ; ,ti i'. /I ` 1 ' , ,1. 'r., p fr , .,, 'd :..• .1.k. 4.40 ,..T.,/, , ;1, ,di i ., `X ;- "- . it 1, L 1 , 0. 1 , .1 • .q?•" 'J M t" !` i u IH ' 4141 I �5 p ,t; i. iil _r I y I=11 PppI I� A 1- , ����� 1_ _ 1- is ii 't\r i ,i. ". ii, '? Jl 1 -4, `‘` ,'`':-.• i 1'. i ,1 i- '27,..1i. j \\ ar i 1 From to 520-742-1022 at 11/1/00 1:41 PM 002/0C MEMORANDUM November 1,2000 TO: David Rpnquillo,Planner Tech FROM: Gigi Miller,Public Art Review Committee SUBJECT: Rancho Vistoso Fire Station The Public Art Review Committee has reviewed the plans for the four panel wall mosaic/mural and would like to request an actual color palette and samples of the glass to be used in the project. The committee is concerned about the number of colors in the palette. We feel the palette needs to be limited. Gigi Miller David Grigsby Harriet Hough Public Art Review Committee MEMORANDUM November 10, 2000 TO: David Ronquillo,Planner Tech FROM: Gigi Miller,Public Art Review Committee SUBJECT: Rancho Vistoso Fire Station The Public Art Review Committee has reviewed and approved the art work for the Rancho Vistoso Fire Station. e Gigi Miller David Grigsby Harriet Hough Public Art Review Committee I , TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 8 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: September 13,2000 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Bayer Vella, Senior Planner SUBJECT: OV12-00-06 GOLDER RANCH FIRE STATION NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION, SALVAGE AND MITIGATION AND LANDSCAPE PLANS, LOCATED WITHIN RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 7I, SOUTH SIDE OF WOODBURNE AVENUE AND EAST OF THE WAPA EASEMENT BACKGROUND The WLB Group, representing the Golder Ranch Fire District, requests approval of a Native Plant Preservation Plan(NPPP) and Landscape Plan for a fire station within Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 7 Parcel I. The subject property is located approximately 0.35 miles west of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard, 0.2 miles north of Tangerine Road, and abuts the southern edge of Woodburne Avenue. The Development Review Board recommended approval of the Development and Architectural Plans on May 9, 2000. In turn,the Town Council approved both of the aforementioned plans on May 17,2000. SITE SUMMARY General Plan Designation: Neighborhood Commercial Zoning: C-1 Site Area: 1.23 acres Proposed Structure: 6,900 sq./ft Surrounding Land Uses: North: Rancho Vistoso NH 7F, Reflections Subdivision It is important to note that the backs of the homes abut Woodburne Avenue. Furthermore, a wall encloses them. In addition,the units are similar in height to the proposed fire station. East: Vacant Land,Zoned C-1 West: WAPA Easement and a Utility Substation, PAD Open Space South: Vacant Land,Zoned C-1 NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION, SALVAGE AND MITIGATION Chapter 14 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised provides that all developments (public or private) must provide native plant preservation, salvage and mitigation(NPP) and landscape plans. The NPP plan provides an inventory of 135 protected plants that are on this site. In sum, the applicant proposes salvaging 75 protected plants (Palo Verde, Mesquite, Barrel Cactus, Catclaw, and Acacia etc.); however, none of the plants will be retained in place. Most notably, there are 63 fishook barrel cactus that will be transplanted. A more detailed summary is included on page 2 of 2 on the plan. 1 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 3 The mitigation plan meets all the requirements of the OVZCR. LANDSCAPE PLAN The Landscape Plan also meets all of the requirements of the OVZCR and Town Council conditions of Development Plan approval. There were several conditions associated with the approval of the Development Plan. The following two are germane to the Landscape Plan: • Section 9-107 of the OVZCR must be strictly adhered to—unless specifically modified by the town council. In particular, the development plan and landscape plan must depict a landscape-parking island adjacent to the interior sidewalk. • Reduce the number of parking spaces to twenty-three. As depicted on the plan, the two aforementioned conditions were fulfilled. GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE Staff finds that the Golder Ranch Fire Station NPP and Landscape Plans are in conformance with General Plan Policy 8.1 G, "Indigenous(native desert)vegetation and riparian habitats should be maintained...". DRB REVIEW The Development Review Board voted unanimously to recommend approval of the NPPP and Landscape Plan. RECOMMENDATION The Native Plant Preservation, Salvage and Mitigation Plan, and Landscape Plans are in substantial compliance with the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development and the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised. Staff recommends approval of each. SUGGESTED MOTION The Town Council may wish to consider the following motion: I move to approve OV 12-00-06, Golder Ranch Fire Station in Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 71, which includes native plant preservation, salvage and mitigation and landscape plans. ATTACHMENTS Reduction of NPPSM and Landscape Plans 9 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 3 of 3 /74(4-ve-- Planning and Zoning Administrator Co unity Develo, ent Director Town Manag-r F:\OV\OV12\2000\12-00-06\TC Landscape Report.doc t' I �•' j i 1 i /�• i GENERAL NOTES i 1. AS REQUIRED BY THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY,A NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION AND SCALE J'� 1 MILE /1�,� Vi SALVAGE PLAN HAS BEEN PREPARED BY THE WLB GROUP.INC FOR GOLDER RANCH FIRE DEPT.. .,!}iRANCHO ViSTOSO,NEIGHBORHOOD 7,PARCEL I. ` .-*2. A SITE INSPECTION AND 91VENTORY OF ALL TREES(3 INCH CALIPER OR GREATER)AND i 106:b\%iiiiriroil.: CACTI PER ORO VALLEY CODE,CHAPTER 14 AND ADDENDUM ft, '�i WAS CONDUCTED BY THE YA B GROUP.INC. y1 1J 3. THIS PLAN SHOWS APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS OF PLANTS SUBJECT 1 I 31 i TO THE CODE MENTIONED ABOVE. AU.TREES,SAGUARO,AND BARREL CACTUS - SUBJECT TO INVENTORY PER THE SALVAGE CODE HAVE BEEN I FLAGGED WITH COLORED RIBBON PER THIS CODE. ALL OTHER PLANTS SUBJECT TO PROJECT ,. � r111.0 s \/\ INVENTORY HAVE BEEN INVENTORIED,MAPPED AND/OR DESCRIBED HEREIN. v, \ AREA • f 4. THIS PLAN IS SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ORO VALLEY ZONING ` N.\ CODE.SEC.14-t09,COMPLIANCE AND SEC.14-110,INSPECTION. �1 / \ '\ h / / 5. THE SALVAGED VEGETATION PER THIS PLAN WILL BE STORED IN AN ON-STE HOLDING L _ \ \ � \ / / AREA AND WILL BE WATERED WITH AN AUTOMATIC DRIP IRRIGATION SYSTEM AND i��', to MAINTAINED UNTIL REPLANTED ONSRTE OR THE SALVAGED VEGETATION WILL BE i I / \ // ,� SPADED DIRECTLY TO THEIR NEW LOCATIONS,OR THEY WALL REMAIN IN PLACE AS -- \ / �'°18°/°C°° / SHOWN. THE TEMPORARY NURSERY SHALL BE MONITORED BY THE LANDSCAPE I 1 C/ ,. �= 'i\ \ / / / ARCHITECT,OR A QUAUFlED NURSERYMAN. ._.._.._.._.._.._'�.'_~.._.__.._.._.._.._- '\ \ `50 / / 6. A TEMPORARY NURSERY WILL l!E LOCATED ON SITE AS SHOWIv ON THIS PLAN. PARCEL-7F \ / ,"� �O / 219-53-00+N \ __ ----- / SALVAGED VEGETATION SHALL HAVE MISTLETOE REMOVED AND SHALL BE LOCAT70:4 MAP \ ___ ,C.� / REGULARLY FERTIUZED. _- BEING A PORTIO SECTION 36 C `, ,"� '�!; / TEMPORARY NURSERY sV .,\ \ %. .4f APPROXIMATE LOCATION pw • \ 7' SHALL TO��OR DISTURBANCE FORPAREAS CTIONN DU �BINGPANND GRADING T-11-S, R-13-E, G. & S. , TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, / � OPERATIONS, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA !� " / � 8. PRIOR TO ANY SALVAI;E,TREES SHALL BE TAGGED IN ACCORDANCE WITH / II • C , \ SECTION 14-110 AND INSPECTIONS.AS REQUIRED BY THAT SECTION.SHALL BE \� \ PERFORMED BY THE TONRYS ZONING INSPECTOR. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS,THE ZONING INSPECTOR SHALL INSPECT THE SITE AND IF ADDITIONAL PLANTS ARE DEEMED SALVAGEABLE OTHER THAN THOSE TAGGED. / `` THEN THOSE PLANTS SHALL BE EITHER SALVAGED OR BOXED.AS NECESSARY. / ''' /� - - ;� 9. NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPROVED NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLAN I / Cs — AND\OR DESTRUCTION OF PROTECTED PLANTS SHALL RESULT IN FlNES IN l \ ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 14-109 OF THE OVZCR. / - ; \ / 10. ALL SALVAGED MATERIALS SHALL BE REUSED ON-SITE. / 5� / b / / ——— / ,/ S�r� 11. TAGS(PLASTIC TAPE)SHALL BE COLOR-COOED ACCORDING TO THE FOLLOWING SCHEDULE: / EXISTING NATIVE PLANTS TO BE TRANSPLANTED ON SITE BLUE(ITOS) EXISTING NATIVE PLANTS TO REMAIN IN PLACEri WHILE t�tPIP)))) / r. \ \ . RED(oS � EXISTING NATIVE PLANTS TO BE pESTR0YFt1 ....._......._._....._. • / /. i • 12. PLANT LOCATIONS HERE DETERMINED WITH LIRE ASSISTANCE OF A 0.0BAL / / \ \ POSITIONING STaIeM. THIS SYSTEM IS ACCURATE TO WITHIN APPROXIMATELY T.E.P.PAR t �.,�,� THREE METERS. SUBSEQUENTLY,THE PLANT SYMBOLS SHOWN MAY NOT UE W 219-53- l0 / / ` \ \ DIRECTLY ON THE PLANT AS SHOWN ON THE AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH. - / \ \ > / \ 13. PER SECTION 14-105 I,OVICR,THE TEMPORARY NURSERY SHALL ROUTINELY BE WATERED Q / AND ANY PLANTS THAT DIE SHALL BE REPLACED. < / / �� / \ \ d `...." \ in W CL ll U Z TREE SALA VAGEASiLITT PROJECT LAYOUT ALL PLANTS THAT MEET THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA SHALL BE EITHER PRESERVED IN PLACE OR SALVAGED. D:EL a A. PLANT HEALTH IS GOOD TO EXCELLENT WITH NO MAJOR INFESTATIONS O SCALE: I = 5 O OR APPARENT DISEASES. 0 B. PLANT AGE IS YOUNG ENOUGH TO SUGGEST A LIKELY CHANCE OF TRANSPLANT SURVIVAL • C. LANTISAUUNDA(UPRIGHT AT AND BRANCHING).CCONDUCIVE TO BOX OR SPADE • TRD. SOILS CAN BE EXCAVATED,ARE COHESIVE AND SEEM CAPABLE OF SUPPORTING A BOXED OR SPADED ROOT BALL • E. SURROUDING TOPOGRAPHY PERMITS ACCESS WITH THE APPROPRIATE • EQUIPMENT NEEDED TO BOX OR SPADE AND REMOVE PLANT. F. ADJACENT PLANTS DO NOT POSE A LIKELY INTERFERENCE WITH ROOT r ! i" 'ZVM SYSTEMS OR IN ItRFtltt WITH PLANT REMOVAL 4' • G. THE OVERALL FORM AND CHARACTER IS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE SPECIES AND IS A i VALUABLE SPECIMEN FOR LANDSCAPE OR HABITAT PURPOSES. ,. CL AUG 1. 6 2000 ' - BY:saasaaaaasaaaaa...,I1said GOLDER RANCH FIRE STATION RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 7, PARCEL I NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLAN I Any plant deemed salvageable by the Zoning Inspector shall be salvaged. flP-�= 4.„, BEING PORTION OF SECTION 36 . Town of Oro Valley Native Plant Salvage Plan approved by. .! T-11-S, R-13-E, G.S.R.M. I, G1L�J TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA i The Engineering Planning Surveying GPom.E > Landscape Architecture Urban Design Date .��.. SCALE:A$SHOWN Ovt2-Ot>-06 WLB Offices located In Vegas Phoenix Planning & Zoning Administrator • i. CONTOUR INTERVAL:NA 11 JANUARY 2000 end Lae Vepee 4444 East Broadway WLB JOB NO. 199071A001 REVISED APRIL 21, 2000 1 OF 2 Group Tucson,Arizona c5201 eelaaeo REVISED: JUNE 23, 2000 REVISED: JULY 21, 2000 g L Li • e N 1_ / .., NATIVE PLANT INVENTORY \ \ 'µ` ) // � ='!' ACACIA GRlO011 PRO8OP18 VELUTINA kiii • / • 4/ CATCLAW ACACIA(AO) VELVET MESQUITE(M) ` - \ CIO f TAG NUiB6t CAPER 1K) i F�Iiif JFf 1 (�f9EATORRE1iP/l�L MOOR COLOR _ —T9Pr"-TAG HMS CAPER PO MG T 1 T 1I�RE-14 R• • ia RED \ • j.• ` \ •� # A g7pA f6 f¢ Ri� =� 1 4 10 4 A RED + +' \ '`>� ` �. f A B4 6 6 i - RED ,,g •, ri 4 n Rg CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM B� 7 6% c R FOOTHILLB PALO VERDE(PV) t',. ` I� 182868 2 6 B UE �. '"� � - A 1 gygg 10 gg 8 R TYPE TAG K ABER CALIPER Pi I WIGHT(FT) CRITERIA FOR RBCCVAL RB90N COLOR y A 137 B 5 C I R . PV 57 8 10 A REDS - / 4( u,oa •fi pp ahw I • 4 I 3.5 ,. ,... PV 104 90 10 16 G RED " - i 7l t z •• ACACIA CONSTRICTA PV iob5 �A io c RED i' A. .. a T, WHITETHORN ACACIA(AC) PV its - 8 - 10 BLUE ppZy,Aces Q 11 -, T" ,.'• y,' '* i TYPE TAG NUIIBi CAPER IlAL1 HBGBT IFE1 CRIMEA FOR MUM N®ON COLOR AC83 ..?AP� , ,.:� �µ - t4 .:Y. A 1� 4 16 A _ BE E , ' 3, ' ' fir ] � ,?� { dt, ,,, �'� # �� •a♦� f.s�. ".�� '.r �F' >r y� S"`-'T".:<r>' AG �8 � 6 A E A.- .x alp,. A.* `it?' 4 '..-4,'''"SL} A j' $ " ' 4' . ++.; AC 3 F Y S FEROCACTUB w18LEZENII .ti" _ '' ;y > 2. ,•;r.r.> s_ r.. r , AG $5 7�' ♦ _,,�( ,�. � A 967Fi8HHOOK BARREL(BA) A679 • , � '<" f .r ^ J / - , #[.. "s+ AC 7 10 TYPE (TAG MIA6ER IEN,WT{FT.I tb88011CQ.oR ofAGOo R } ' ..a ey Y.Q r..� ?TtAC1?54 9$ 9. 1 , r AC 8 9 i cc•, a ;�±. ?. .?p, f off, .f1 ` , A 0 10 A . { " S � BA ii BLUE O � t -sus':. i A 77 6 9 E ;t x«r l 4. p} 4 ♦ + r y -l N Aa A 65 R` BA 0 BLUE N w ,.� JO i '' Y '�"s • a" A 7 6 F R` BA 3t 1 BLUE y 6f g , k Rn�1 J1+ i / [ k ear', ?6 AG 84 7 4 ` BA 3yy , 1 BLUE r' A .a • �. + 4' e. @ QQ 12 BA 33 1 BLUE W s +.. � litillito -- .. .' _ } .' - AG 87 6 T 10 _ A _ R` BA 354 1 BLUE • Q " 9 ,a r a..,,, M #. ' ~ , E A 109 6 B G _ REp r 3& BLUE BLUE J"% A 112 9 A RE 7 3 GLUE Q 41 x a \ �' , 5#14 if 4 qAtt11gg1 _ RED 1 38 1 BLUE J+as ♦ 14. s #` a{ * +. -,q:r ii8 1 G REpp �g 3 gLUe r {+ ,. A 1 10 1 B R D ill 1 BLU i � 7'" K fi', , A 14 1 BLt]E BA 41 1 BLUE 1 : + �. f - A 122222239p 62 R D BA 43 1 BWE . w i ;'' A 131 6 6 G RD BA 44 2 BI UE n / �,. _ K4 *1 fA AC 133 6 6 F RED BA 45 1 BI UE i ,; ' )F A 13 6 7 BLUE BA 4fi 3 RI OF Fr v BA 48 3 BLUE BA 49 BBI UE A 58 8 UE /\ SITE PLAN A 5i BLUE , A 62 BWc a �r SCALE: 1" = 40' Ii W BLUE Q' 111 CRITERIA FOR REMOVAL I^ IS " Il NATIVE PLANT SUMMARYIA ^ 7 r LUE z A POOR HEALTH en is u Z BLUE RIBBON WHITE RIBBON RED RIBBON TOTAL PER B TOO LARGE OR OLD BA 75 1 LuE TRANSPLANT PRESERVE IN PLACE DESTROY PLANT �^ �o uE ACACIA CONSTRICTA WHITETHORN ACACIA 4 0 29 33 C NOT CONDUCIVE TO BOXING OR SPADING en Bt 2 LUE CC J ACACIA GREGGI CATCLAW ACACIA 4 0 20 24 D POOR SOILS BA es 2 BLUE . BA3 BLUE FEROCACTUS WSLEZENII FISHHOOK BARREL 63 0 0 63 -BA I 83 1 BLUE C7 CELTIS PAWDA DESERT HACKBERRY 0 0 3 3 E SLOPED TOPOGRAPHY BA 65 1 BBLUE LUE PROSOPIS YELUTINA VELVET MESQUITE 1 0 3 4 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO*KOE 3 0 5 6 F TOO CLOSE TO ADJACENT PLANTS BBAA es 1 BLUE E TOTAL PER CATAGORY 75 0 60 135 G POOR FORM AND CHARACTER BA sa a BLUE BLUE 99 1 BLUE BA 100 3 BLUE III BA I 1 II BLUE NOTES BA 111 I BLUL BA 135 1 BLUE PLANTS DESIGNATED AS TO BE REMOVED/DESTROYED HAVE ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. A. PLANT HEALTH IS POOR TO MEDIUM WITH INFESTATIONS OR APPARENT DISEASES. INSIGNIFICANT VEGETATION MITIGATION B. PLANT AGE SUGGESTS UNLIKELY CHANCE OF TRANSPLANT SURVIVAL. SIGNIFICANT VEGETATION DESTROYED MITIGATION TOTALS C. PLANT IS DAMAGED AND IS NOT CONDUCIVE TO BOX OR SPADE 1 (PV #103) 1 48" BOX PALO VERDE TREE TRANSPLANTING (IRREGULAR BRANCHING). 2 36" BOX PALO VERDE TREES 15 UNDERSTORY PLANTS D. SOILS CANNOT BE EXCAVATED AND ARE NOT CAPABLE OF SUPPORTING A BOXED OR SPADED ROOT BALL. E. SURROUDING TOPOGRAPHY DENIES ACCESS WITH THE APPROPRIATE III NATIVE PLANT MITIGATION EQUIPMENT NEEDED TO BOX OR SPADE AND REMOVE PLANT. OF PLANTS MEETING ALL CRITERIA DESTROYED MITIGATION TOTALS GOLDER RANCH FIRE STATION F. ADJACENT PLANTS POSE A LIKELY INTERFERENCE WITH ROOT RANCHO VISTOSO SYSTEMS OR INTERFERE WITH PLANT REMOVAL. 0 0 G. THE OVERALL FORM AND CHARACTER IS NOT REPRESENTATIVE OF THE SPECIES AND NEIGHBORHOOD 7, PARCEL IS NOT A VALUABLE SPECIMEN FOR LANDSCAPE OR HABITAT PURPOSES. i NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLAN I, �� „I \` >; BEING PORTION OF SECTION 36 ➢ 25621 ? T-11—S, R-13—E, G.S.R.M. The Engtneartng Planning survayk, GRI L• )+ TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA 1Landscape Architecture urban Design WLSCALE:1'�a0'-0' Group omr»e laoalaaa In Tucson,Ph<,en,a 0V12-00-06 and Las Vegas lL' CONTOUR INTERVAL:NA Grou 4444 Banat Broadway 11 JANUARY 2000 Tucson,Arizona (520)881-7480 WLB JOB NO. 199071A001 REVISED APRIL 21, 2000 2 OF 2 8 ir. PREVISED JUNE 23,2000 REVISED JULY 21,2000 a J ' RANCHO VISTOSO GO L D E R RAN F I RE [K E PT. Mt ,; 5 ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA AUG 1 6 2000 illi LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS q )1- BY: ie... i -- ■ n , i ■.a■■a■alining ,■ SCALE 3%.1 MRE V N/ • i � --" GENERAL NOTES: , 0. air ---.. -. 1. IS LANDSCAPE PLAN IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS AND INTENTIONS a OF THE FOLLOWING PLANS AND ORDINANCES: / ,'` 1 a ' \ / / ! "r i A. THE NATIVE PLANT SALVAGE AND LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS, CHAPTER 14. \ / / \\ // W" agince y PROJECT +� \ / / /' AREA i B. ORO VALLEY LANDSCAPE CODE, CHAPTER 14. THIS PLAN PROVIDES FOR A 20' \ // // BUFFERYARD 'A' ALONG WOODBURNE AVENUE, A 10' BUFFERYARD 'D' ON THE WEST PROPERTY LINE, A 25' BUFFERYARD 'D' ON THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE AND A 10' BUFFERYARD 'D' ON THE / , ``-- / // I ------------ EAST PROPERTY LINE. p �`\��\` // _ —t i 2. PROPOSED LANDSCAPE WILL BE WATERED WITH AND AUTOMATIC UNDERGROUND DRIP ---� IRRIGATION SYSTEM. IRRIGATION SYSTEM WILL MEET ASIC MINIMUM STANDARDS. ` \, ` i I ZY 3. SALVAGED VEGETATION WILL BE REUSED PER THIS PLAN. Q ;' ,``� LOCATION MAP Z p `c BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 36 T-11—S, R-13—E, G. do S. R. M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, 4. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS, LANDSCAPE ASSURANCES WILL BE COLLECTED. W ,1t '� v \ PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA a. Q 5. IN THE EVENT OF ABANDONMENT, ALL DISTURBED AREAS OF THE SITE SHALL v{' �,,',� .btu // ? \ co BE RE-VEGETATED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF OVZCR SEC. 14-205.8.11 °�. q, \ a v.: , / a \ 6. THE PROPERTY OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING THE TEMPORARY — — — U b IRRIGATION SYSTEM AS LONG AS NECESSARY IN ORDER TO TRANSITION , /\ i*"\ "7PLANTS OVER TO NATURAL SOURCES. ANY PLANTS THAT DIE IN TRANSITION, a t+ n- FOR ANY REASON, SHALL BE REPLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH OVZCR SEC. 14-205.C.7. '' ` a� M�� ,i , \ \ SHEET INDEX 7. PER OVZCR SEC. 14-211, MAINTENANCE, THE LANDSCAPE SHALL BE Q'`y / \ \ L-1. COVER SHEET MAINTAINED AS FOLLOWS: N. \ L-2. LAYOUT PLAN a A.) THE LANDSCAPED AREAS ARE TO BE MAINTAINED IN A WEED-FREE ,'.:21 / \ c? L-3. PLANTING PLAN TRASH FREE CONDITION. a \ \ L-4. IRRIGATION PLAN 0 B.) ANY DEAD PLANT MATERIALS, INCLUDING SALVAGED PLANTS WHICH / / \ \ L-5. CONSTRUCTION DETAILS DO NOT SURVIVE, ARE TO BE REPLACED WITHIN 90 DAYS. - - - / it C.) REPLACEMENT PLANT MATERIALS ARE TO BE OF A SIMILAR SIZE / \ L-6. SPECIFICATIONS, U AND QUALITY. • \ z D.) THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN PROPER WORKING ORDER. w ®PROJECT LAYOUT a 8. TREE PLACEMENT TO BE FIELD ADJUSTED AS NEEDED TO AVOID PROPOSED UTILITIES. O AND OTHER CONCERNS. SCALE: 1" = 50 OWNER 9. FOR ALL VEGETATION LOCATED IN THE SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLES (SVT'S), A CLEAN PLANE OF VISIBILITY SHALL BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN 30" AND 72" IN HEIGHT. GOLDER RANCH FIRE DISTRICT 3535 E. HAWSER ST. ORO VALLEY, AZ 85737 C/O CHIEF JOHN FINK (520) 825-9001 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the Landscape, Irrigation and Revegetation Information shown on these drawings was performed under my direction and that all information is correctly described. RANCHO VISTOSO BY: /� � - � GATE: 8^l8-oa NEIGHBORHOOD 7, PARCEL I `� GOLDER RANCH FIRE STATION BEING A PORTION OF THE S.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 36, !I. TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, G.&S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA no CONTOUR INTERVAL 1' -, z REVISED DATE 21 APRL 00 REVISED DATE:,ULY 21,2000 OV12 00-06 • W Engineering Planning Surveying �• p.N M.m ,407.77V. L—1 U 9 9 9 Seoi. AS SHOWN '&j ;'r:' SMet E, TheVI/LB Landscape Architecture Urban Design GOLDER RANCH FIRE DEPARTMENT LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 7 VVLB Offices located in Tucson, Phoenix 4"Me•199071—A-001 a: ' 1 Q Las Vegas,and Victar Valley,Ca COVER SHEET6ARY L ' 4444 East Broadway pate MARCH 24. 2000 !'.f/� Group Tucson,Arizona (520)set-74Eo 00 6"` Project �,..t Tnto pe'i4^ed Ely JMC et o Revisions ch.erw ey GIG - " cn — _l k 4 i `�;� •1 ! PARCEL Hv NEIGH�ifORH00D 7 / // BK.46 M&P/PG.88 / / / / \ 3j`T e / • DK r.8533 PC.1Q98- /� �� ,06 / / // \ , \ fj _/A� „i / i / .1 /1 !I1 // / � / /•crn 'o `� �� I: ,i .‘., ' v \ a .c \` \ I TE WALL SEE DETAIL 'EET •1.1 '' �\ ` =� \ ` 212 1 / O I// ' r / // l / "".......N. - �/ .1/ 1 1 / / / \ / / ��� '---- _,- , // .. z / P 1 ___---, --: ' I• `� 9. p a / / 1/ '. 1"\ . , ...\�,'/ ^ \ c., \ / \ U 1°F w to r / i!, 'x: \ \ \ a ENS Ar ` / / f �cur I / • \ / / \ — — / • 4:...,/ -� r; ' c`o• d/ / �a1 P��g7y ES\ Z .y / \ KS 8a�tN ' d \ `i r� • cc, `\ / / / / SOS.4� \ • :47// All WITH ONT , \E.M ce ``Z " / OF UILDINC� \ i �,• Q FIRE STATION ;'\ / %` \ \ o 1 t AN.- �.. . 'J--"`' /,' / / / \ U `\ -, i Z \�\ cti \ 5^Z ,r' / \ rs \I oa / 0 ///// \ C./ // / \ `� // o^ SITE WALL SEE bETAIL SHEET A1.1 1'ss,\ 7. \ --- ---�.._L—� lea,. es \ / \ I- — — — --- — \/ \ 4!`,ram S / i o, \ \ \. N. / \ 46'0, \\ o 0 RANCHO VISTOSO a �, . NEIGHBORHOOD 7, PARCEL I .2), GOLDER RANCH FIRE STATION N / \ 0' 20' 40' 60' 'g, h BEING A PORTION OF THE S.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 36, cni J TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, „ ille%111111111.111 S G.&S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY.PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA 8 J 4' CONTOUR INTERVAL 1' Z g' `0' REVISED DATE: 21 APRIL 00 REVISED DATE: 21 JULY 00 0V12-00-06 a • The Engineering Planning Surveyng Ne• DoS ice" Soots -.,': Sheaf L-2 N Landscape Architecture Urban::sign GOLDER RANCH FIRE DEPARTMENT LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ,•-20 Offices loeoted in Tucson, Phoenix Jab Ne•199071—A-001 o:+ �,1L�\iA � WLB Las Vegas,and Victor Valley,Ca LAYOUT PLAN 4444 East Broadway Dale MARCH 24. 2000 r•,naf Group Tucson,Arizona (520)881-7480 ,' ,. 6 o..lon.a a MC er — ,m P Shoot 11h . Pocked a MG '� � rn J 4144r / . \ lgllr\ , / TREES ` \` , S101 OM SZE RANT NNE COMM \4��/ 26 15 G. TEXAS HONEY AESOIAiE \ `�, } 13 24'BOX PROSOMS MIENS'S \ �\ 19 iS O. aIM.EAN MESQUITE \ \ • S 24'BOX 90PNORA SEClMM1FLORA \ \i \\�� t lEl(AS YOUN7A9i W11tEl. ____ �--- 111,4411111 SHRUBS AND ACCENTS kX- � '` -., - -� sm an � ruNt NNE o0�>5I I ---- � �p tA1t6 �. _ )/ ( i ' �4 37 S GASYLK�M£FiD6 DESERT OON I I V \ \-- ® M S C. 11ES'ERALOE PARMFLORA RANDOMLY MIX:309 RED . / w•: � //„� J -�. YUCCA 509 YEILON �'�� f1 ,i ' C•'- I I\ 40'NIGH BEM \ t �_ I 23 S G UIECOP4IYLLUM FRUlE5CEN5 HYBRID i ♦ �� S \ • RNN RAvO SAGE ., C7e��r \,, �—` \ \\ I • 27 S G. LEl1COPHYWIY LAYOMAWAE'R!O BRAVO' ,l �F NO BRAVO SAGE \ �e,.4) I \ ,i�— •• I lipPir -- SORT NSBIUTY TPoANCLE,M.f * 39 S G. NOVA 19CROCARPA / l. ►�I / ���/��� `� DG �\ BEAR GRASS tin _ DG� y ��\ • 33 S G. SALMA CU-EIMAR +`+� v— ., c\ *\N !J• \ • CHAPARRAL SACS )!:j (1? '/,,/ / J SItq .,• a I) �', G 46 S G. SALVIA GREGG* • / r iff \_. .\\\ ± . -► I RED AUTUMN SAGE , ( �\ J �. ,1� to I .r� `` . 27 3 G SALVIA GREGOA AD �� METE AUTUMN SAGE 4I ,•� 1 / / •, 4 ♦ 0 57 1 G LANTANA MONTEMDENSS RANDOMLY MIX:309 PURPLE � Li r / ) / ♦Q ` 1 �.t` ' -�"`( LANTANA 509 COLD } ego /'a Q /♦ vTRANSPLANTS "�_ Art...„ XA Q ♦ ;, �\ \ pet SAL CITY. KW MS OO�(IS -- ':111tit ,, AlPi ---, I. ��"T' _1 \\--••---- , \ �• '` TRANSPLANTED FROM SITE -•�' 'Q \� , /® 3 d7tCI01l1M MCROPNttUM l (13., tar a'. i'` •�v♦iI• ' c`� I,I , J c` I 1 ` �� r�(W �I / / � ', `a ` 1 MIESC TE VELUTMA TRANSPLANTED FROM STE (;1 / MESOUTE_` ,/t, ,� D ;\ •.• ;♦' • �� 1 , �.;�., .', ,a \ f /:�` � �\— p: -•',.� 4 '.`�. • !' •♦!"=.F. . W,►. .� ...Al, , �•= ■,. i ,,•'�. • j%� • ,\ �... ,'. \ 4.0:. ` (®) 4 ACACIAAMETET aCO ACAa� TRANSPLANTED FROM STE• AOD �-' - \� �..� ► ••x, `, \ ®\ ♦ ACACIA CREGq TRANSPLANTED FROM 9TE �. Ail -\ \) Q, ►�. > no on\ •,_�•�� ♦� - ` \ \`I/ CATS0.AW ACACIA t ��_ ( (--)K__ 63 FEROCACTUS MSLENZEN11 TRANSPLANTED FROM STE CC I i. -. I411* •�. • 'MY. i \ BARREL CACTUS r / �� i . .►. c. S \ ` Q. ;'I zyes ;4,• X HYDROSEED o iet: ► �:•�� ffr � \ �.:':i ORO VALLEY APPROVEDREVEGETAT)ON 0 I �� •�, i ,, SEED MIX LIST LL ►. i� / /� \ ♦ �.` , / //(i°,, �t'l* \ \ ... HYDROS®Mtx A A.1..;r P.a. e-0..,.,str.r Sown w.r...ill / ?' \Jr' a E - - -: FI}i'E STATION • SSS w • t SI. =' i DG +.. al ` \ C h.R.-Mn. MO.own. MO CIA p • • }�, • `` •� \ :•.:�,, .•� 1'`` 4 ` tin.f.sl 11.i4.iI► MO 1C C7 �1� ` /_ fL to i.„ 2795 \ rerrr. no.a.+.ra (►,cM to •.�JJ.''��• \.' "9 4. % , On. On.nle... (FA . a.P.ren rw I.,w.w.I.+rr.a (o.aD to ',\ •;.o...� i•%• /, \.\ ���--� ` ........7........ al Y.IrI wA.Mb.i.► AF.h to-ZA c r s.wr rr.roan c.+smt.� (PSI u-w �. u '; :• / ,'''i \ •�� ` o.er Ma. •...r o•na (PM zA-u 7'- (// __ 1.0 / I 2_•`__ a De /Air \_ �? —� �� ` \ ►.r.Fri• TP+ran......L R M ,A-u ' `` S / \ I/ \ •n+�w►wn F.rrlr.ar... <+�cl A ao �,. s.r worn ,A-zoo Ir ,- \ •/.. •`�: .,.\�/ if, t ,W.rd...n Ann..a...1.Mil 2A-1A ...,, oa...t..,.torn..(PA .A , / ',.., .,: .,,,,,, •< `W O..9..Ono.dirt. 1.0-2.0 LS' ` L... 1A / #16, F.,.Iwu,Pali 1.0 ' 1 \ I 1A-G to f i" �.• D►�•`�`,\ 4.-`-� u, ' X j -----"--- ` NOTES ��? % / / 1. DEC011P0,C' GRANITE DG)M AL AS11AVAL AREAS 91 VAL OTHER MAE NOTED.WE 3/3.MIHM / !�� � � �•/ ,_ / ( �� �• 'i /.�' 2'DEPTH.COLOR'DESERT COD AS AVAM-ABLE FROM KALAMAZOO MATERIALS / JJ I ,./ / ` \ •''••v, •\ \\ / 2 EXTEND DECOMPOSED GRANITE TO CURB AT MOODBVRNE AVE. .i' \ ! iglir, . ( \,�IUFFERYARD COMPLIANCE T LE `, 1'`t ' ,��, l, BUFFER _ PER 100 IF PLANTS PROVDED ,� RANCHO VISTOSO TYPE TREES S ANTS TREES SHRUBS ACCENTS IIERUMD TROMDED ES NEIGHBORHOOD 7, PARCEL NORTH A 20 6 6 9. 15 J6 23 255 DO BERM 40' BERM 40' GOLDER RANCH FIRE STATION /\ flV 201 40' 60, EAST — D �D_ 10 10 16 _ 32 3S 240 DO SEEL940 WALL Tr WALL 72' BEING A PORTION OF THE S.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 36, ,, SOUTHD 25 4 4 6 10 27 12 196 DO♦SEEDwG WALL 72' WALL 72' TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, J „ 60.11111111111.1111! 9051 0 10 10 to 19 23 3e 33 230 DG&SEEDING WALL 72' WALL 72' G.& S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA CONTOUR INTERVAL 1' Z REVISED DATE: 21 APRIL 00 REVISED DATE: 21 JULY 00 0V12-00-06 a Engineering Planning Surveying / No. Dal. H.m 4' ..'-.ry. L-3 The GOLDER RANCH FIRE DEPARTMENT >_ CONSTR CTION DOCUMENTS 1.6 =zD 5h«1 Landscape Archlteeturs Urban peslgn �Nd Apri hE No.199071-A-001 /• 1L WLB Offices located in Tucson, Phoenix Loa Vegan.and Victor Valley,Co PLANTING PLAN ' < �+► MARCH 24 2000 GARY n Group 4444 East Broadway ).'D Tucson.Arizona (320)881-7460 '�•6r JAC 01 8 Cho.k.d SY GIG kic P�� Sh..1 TNts RMslem _ L_- t IRRIGATION POINT Of CONNECTION i' \ `.. / // AT 1" WATER METER ?; \� • Q Q r / / IRRIGATION LEGEND j \\ A / / SYM. DESCRIPTION REMARKS !' \\ .:-\� / // A CON IA NBRDRESP-8MC METAL CABINET WALL MOUNT --_ •' \`. .9)J Rat` �. / e OK'9533 PC , / BACKFLOW DEVICE / ! il i J/ ` ,'------....„1...›,... .q 1 / FEBCO: 825Y — 3/4' ! hi' /. '�. (� EMITTER CONTROL .ASSEMBLY / `=` \ �. VALVE IRRITROL: 700 SERIES ULTRA FLOW y A-2 �l,zj \\ ,� WYE FILTERS % / Id (� glRugS ` \` \ y� \ RAINBIRD RBY-150MX p 3.3 \ ® QUICK COUPLING VALVE / "" II N. \\ RAINBIRD 33 DLRC % lr 1' A-1 • ` ''''...Z... \ N :RT5:S LINE SIZE / {i 1 j \�/ ' TREEg ^ o` `\ET/ 1, 1 { \ / 1• / 4 , `\ ��s4 URE REGULATOR 2.- 1T. JI l '/,� 2 5 / �, IT:::::: :- \ SENNINGER, OR APPROVED EQUAL / / �( / J // / / ::,....4.1N1 MAIN LINE SCH. 40 PVC, SOLVENT WELD / / , T. / ' /,,''''/ \ \ EMITTER HEADER CLASS 200 PVC, SOLVENT WELD / j '�� / � � �5'S2" `k PIPE SLEEVE. SCH 40 PVC PIPE / ' / F 1 ' \\ �� \`�'� 2X DIAM, OF PIPE BEING SLEEVED /` / 1 �\ / 7', `� \ �l • / APPROXIMATE AREA TO BE IRRIGATED BY / / !' / l'�.;T / %-' / — \N. i — . )• \ EACH DRIP CIRCUIT , p, 1::"/ /r W ' \ // `� /'',\�:, • % IRRIGATION NOTES \ \ �/ L ' /\ 1 IRRIGATION PLAN IS SCHEMATIC AND DRAWN FOR GRAPHIC CLARITY. INSTALL I f/ !` :. ;• e •;°!/ \\\ `\\ j , k /,/ EQUIPMENT WITHIN PLANTING AREAS WHEREVER POSSIBLE. I / � (1 . .. r•�� '. `\ J / 1/ / \ 2 IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS DESIGNED FOR 50 PSI AND 10 GPM MINIMUM AT THE PONT OF ' • 1 f' ` `\\\ `\\ /I / \ CONNECTION. CONFIRM PRIOR TO START OF WORK. ADVISE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IF / /yi y \ \Ni �/ // / PRESSURE EXCEEDS 125 PSI. / I 1 / / / \ . i ' �' `• \\ /— / / // 3 COORDINATE WITH OTHER WORK AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE POWER TO IRRIGATION o / 1 1 \ �/ / \ // \ CONTROLLER. INSTALL AT EYE LEVEL — - / ` 1 a c a ` // / 4 MAKE IRRIGATION POINT OF CONNECTION AS INDICATED ON PLANS AND COORDINATE °Q / `�\ / 1 /\\t„ c,� ���. // ,4�P�%625 S` WITH OTHER WORK AS REQUIRED. W �- tif / ` \\ / / `\� e� / \ OKt'H ,N6a LANE \ 5 INSTALL PIPE AND WIRE UNDER ALL PAVING tN PVC SCH. 40 SLEEVE,SIZE AS REQUIRED. a. j\ \\\` �\ � / ,' �`, // \E j,CI'TU COORDINATE WITH OTHER WORK AS REQUIRED. SLEEVES UNDER SIDEWALK ,WALLS, ETC. NOT SHOWN. Z / I 1 ' / 1 c / // \ 6 INSTALL Ye POLYETHYLENE EMITTER TUBING WITH DRIP EMITTERS AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE l I �\ ��/ I i err '// {O \ IRRIGATION TO ALL NEW AND TRANSPLANTED PLANTS AS SHOWN ON PLANTING PLAN. cc / / )/ ` ` 1 i '/ :Ts. / / \ 7 LAYOUT EMITTER TUBING PARALLEL TO TOPOGRAPGHY WHEREVER POSSIBLE. INSTALL / / ,/ 1 / / \ \ FLUSHABLE TYPE END CAP AT ENDS OF ALL 'fit'UNES AND FLUSH THOROUGHLY w / �,_ FIRE, 1STATIDIV •r 1 //. I ,•/ L- / \ // \ BEFORE INSTALLING EMITTERS. STAKE t/" TUBING IN PLACE AND BURY AT 12. DEPTH. • p / r / '�_ / / - ` // 8 INSTALL FLUSHABLE TYPE END CAP AT ENDS OF ALL'�'LINES AND FLUSH THOROUGHLY �_ / / I $--�� l / ,�' ; ••� ` `\ // \ BEFORE INSTAWNG EMITTERS. c' 1 1/ / \\ 1 ,/ / , / / 9 STAKE 34" TUBING IN PLACE AT 20 FOOT ON CENTER AND BURY AT 12-DEPTH BELOW Z ' // r \\\ \. 1 . ;' \ // \ FINISH GRADE OF DECOMPOSED GRANITE. Z \� 1 / �� \\ j1...., i/ t�� A=A / // 10 DISTRIBUTION TUBING(MAXIMUM LENGTH 6') TO EXTEND EMITTERS TO EACH ROOTBALL LU ` 7' \ EES // \ STAKE DISTRIBUTION TUBING IN PLACE " \� ` / r`' I� 1' /,/ FINISH GRADE OF DECOMPOSED GRANITE T 4' ON CENTER. BURY AT 8' DEPTH BELOW El J O `�---'/ \ wail 2.9 , c� \\\ �;,; / 1 11 EMITTER SCHEDULE FOR SHRUBS&GROUNDCOVER: \\ �' / / \ INSTALL SINGLE OUTLET EMITTERS AS FOLLOWS: `\ /• 32 1-GPH EMITTERS AT EACH 5 GALLLON ON PLANTT r �\ .,\ 1)1-GPH EMITTERS AT EACH 1 GALLON PLANT �____ _L_______ 14-94. ;� r? / /•_;-• \ MULTI-OUTLET EMITTERS MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR INDIVIDUAL EMITTERS. �� " .. // 12 EMITTER SCHEDULE FOR TREES: \\ \ \ / // INSTALL MULTI-OUTLET EMITTER AS FOLLOWS: / \ (6) 1-GPH EMITTERS AT EACH 24'BOX r \\\`\ ` / \ 13 SINGLE OUTLET EMITTER - ARG,FlIM, RAINBIRD-XERI-BUG, OR APPROVED EQUAL N.\ ' ,'/ :�� /� MULTI-OUTLET EMITTER - RAINBIRD XERI-BUG XB-10-6, OR APPORVED EQUAL ` LEI // \ 14 INSTALL ALL MULTI-OUTLET EMISSION DEVICES IN SUBTERRANEAN EMITTER BOXES. \ / RAINBIRD SEB-6X. OR APPROVED EQUAL \� \ 15 REVIEW EMITTER LAYOUT WITH ARCHITECT AND ADJUST NUMBER OF EMITTERS FOR �� \ j/ / SPECIFIC PLANTS WHICH REQUIRE GREATER OR LESSER VOLUME OF WATER THAN \\` '•�/ * INDICATED. WALL MOUNT CONTROLLER �, / TYPICAL EMITTER LINE LAYOUT VALVE CALL OUT BRING DOWN WIRE IN RIGID STEEL `" EMITTER UNE END CAP CONDUIT, MAKE ALL CONNECTIONS CONTROLLER & VALVE NO. 3MI POLYETHLENE AP 1/8' DISTRIBUTION TUBING LIE TYPE OF PLANTS IRRIGATED BY DRIP CIRCUIT ��' EMITTERS imum —REMOTE CONTROL VALVE SIZE _ ,_ GALLONAGE PER MINUTE AREA TO BE IRRIGATED BY FOR CIRCUIT �+ EACH DRIP CIRCUIT RANCHO v,�I1 STOSO -.. tril'ij °s- • 1 ' NEIGHBORHOOD 7, PARCEL I ,��_ PRESSURE REGULATOR GOLDER RANCH FIRE STATION /\ 0' 20' 40' 60' BEING A PORTION OF THE S.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 36, J V EMITTER HEADER TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, VIP allimelmill ___ • EMITTER CONTROL ASSEMBLY G.&S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA a CONTOUR INTERVAL 1' Z REVISED DATE: 21 APRIL 00 REVISED DATE: 21 JULY 00 a MAINLINE OV12-00-06 w Ne. pet. hem Seale 1'-20' I!<, :i=;-4 sheet L—4 0 Engineering Planning Surveying The Landscape Architecture Urban Design GOLDER RANCH FIRE DEPARTMENT LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS \` B Offices located n Tucson, Phoenix reb Ne 199071—A-0011L WL Las Vegas.and Victor Valley,Co IRRIGATION PLAN pate MARCH 24. 2000 Group 4444 East Broadway Tucson.Arizona (520)981-7490 ��� G Sy .114 ` et C,' Sheet This M,isiens Checked M Os p, GLG ,•,.- o, • YAM SUPPLY PVC EMITTER HEADER IIIp_ III in..�i -L 1= = CONTROLLER-LIOINIT o MALL I, _�I I� AT EYE-LEVEL ASAPPROAD - RIGA STEEL AU.PVC PIPING TO BE SNAKED `:- 6e TYP VALVE 800 ALIGN EWItI MO **11 M TRENCHES AS 9RD1M •�,=' SPACE EVENLY DISCONNECT SNTRN r-J I t TO VALVES j'`' SIDEWALK,STRUCTURE.WALL,OR CURB ``` { 120 POER SOURCE - i� IN 511FL CONDUIT • i ��.^ 12'TIP. / �/ 7/. \ ` FMSN GRADE NOTES , [ ") 1. TAPE&BINDLE 11UUlNG AND �' ./f// y� � %</�/\ HANG AT 10'INTERVALS NOTE: \ \/ '�\�\�/fi/�j\\y5. 2 ALL 120 VaT ARRAG N G%NDUIT / C / \ �/\\//• // TO BE MSTALIED AS PER LOCAL CODES 1. DO NOT PLACE VKVf(S)N PEDESTRIAN AREAS /\ \ \\/\ j/ �,pIT TO EXiETID 3. PPE BEDDING MATERIAL TO BE ROCK&DEBRIS FREE / / `//�J`�7/ MOM.N 6'LF15.PUDDLE vim WATER \ \\C/y .�./ ,, S F1.BEl'0N0 WALL VALVE BOX PLACEMENT V//� *%/�/.\/`>(r\/////,//: BETtEf11 00! O ri SCALE: NTS a�i/\�j\%/<\i/�r✓,Y�i///i•: 4. THRUST BLOCK AIL DIIECTION CHANGES ' .\/,,/\!�/�l\i,/. •✓;. OF TFE MAINLINE W1H 1 C.F.OF 3020 P.S,L CONCRETE-AS REQUIRED NOTE: fRO1NU CONTROLLER PER CONTROLLER MANUFA(:TURER RE(XAIMENDAlIONS NC PER LOCAL CODE O TRENCH O WALL-MOUNT CONTROLLER SCALE: NTS 'I SCALE NIT PLASTIC VALVE BOX. INSTALL PARALLEL TO PST PARE EDGES 3 ADJACENT TO REG UATOR PAVING MERE POS9BLE 9313 RIGA PVC/ORP FINISH GRADE BUG GP•ENO TUBE ADAPTER �� i—�•7 � BALL VALVE 9RUT s FIAL7GFL0IN FREVENNIER 404 OF OUST.TIBIMG FITTER TUBING ,jt �• 3 GALA ELLS ° .::..!4i.rr�. is ,V�• REMOTE CONTROL VALVE =.:: I:i s: GALV.NIPPLES aS,ReunaN TUBING �� li !I�`? , GALV.UNION - WITH FLU9R VALVE alp/.• � '? Ii 4'DEPTH DRAM 800! GKV STEEL PIPE RASH GRADE A>, :%%:Z(<„"Yl. .'f.< FMISFI GRADE ,V EMITTER TUFlIG MANURE ,, . 1,..e , ,< EMITTER /4,, '\!/��C/4.•;wit*. ?d PVC ADAPTOR 30' STEFI.PM(T1P.) 1. BUNDLE&TAPE IRE EVERY 10 FT. SEAL WAE ENDS 31H SRJCNG MATERIAL. Fl y'( //✓/? ./ BEtDND UTAT .rOGa`�p?� �wii� ROOT BALL �.... /;.\ ?:i";. N CD DRIP VALVE ASSEMBLY ';T,, °co �SCALE NTS EMITTER PLACEMENT FOR CD INDIVIDUAL PLANTS ©BACKFLOW PREVENTER aSCALE: NTT SCALE NI! z 0_ • �VIr EL SHRUB `�((� LOCIQIG ROUND BOX h O R - 77 STE AS REQUIRED ti W FMI91 GRADE •' FORM A 3'DEEP BASIN L FIMSH GRATA LL AROUND SHRUB r = WAFT SLOES AND Or ,, 6) 1 U BOTTOM OF PIT G 1 a, i u T z SOW RELEASE su', .'fit 401' p j L'- - - i FERTILIZER TABLETS 1 ' 11 �' '�R :� cc ' tir-*A: i 7T ' —I TOP OF KIX TO BE FLUSH LU .e.s',i� J, J i , w -u - '�'� — +-- , NTH F1MSN GRADE BM]TRL MIXTURE �� iii —,.`:, C) 3/4'CRUSHED GRAVEL SLAP _ i:RED'EXT91901n. - NUM 1. SEE SPECS FOR SOIL PREPARATION. BALL C.1 BALL VALVE -LENGTH AS 2 WATER SETTLE BAOLCFiLL MAN lNE ! I -6'CRU90 GRAVEL SLAP ,�0 SHRUB PLANTING I I , � - SCALE: TUTS \ / Cii)BALL VALVE SCALE: NTS NAL MBORTAPE(AGS01P) =,��/;rA/ TO 2' LOOGEPOIE PINE 1� \ I STAKE PLACE MBORIAPE NEAR TOP OF TRUNK �( 10 TREE STAKING PER PLANTING DETAIL 6'MO VALVE BOX w/AE-ARM OR APPROVED EQUAL FORM A 4'DEEP BASH t SCARIFY 9DE5 AND ©1/4'DISTRIeUT10N TUBING. INSTALL FINISH GRADE TREE 1 BOTTOM OF PIT RAN81RD DIFFUSER BUG CAP.OR ARCM EQUAL,AT END OF EACH LEGNTH FINt9R GRADE �I OF TUBING. -,L, • ,�,, Q WATERING BASIN PER PLANTING • 2a �/44 RAM roICK COURRA Y BApffLL MIXTURE sr DETAIL COUPUER M PLACE N '_ ! !' SLOW RELEASE (2)STARLESS STEEL QMPS ROOT BALL(SIZE VANES) FERTILIZER TABLETS O MULTI-OUTLET 0-10 D XERI-BUG XB-TO-8.OR EQUAL SG)H.BO 6'NPPLE lldTEs 01/2'POLY EMITTER TUBING. 3/4'CRUSHED CRAWL SUMP I a.FT. I. SEE SPECS FOR SOL PREPARATRN. ®FlPUSH GRADE. 2. REMOVE ALL NURSERY STAKES,POTS AND WOODEN I BOX.SAES ANO BOTTOMS BEFORE PLANTING 0 TREE. SIM G E SP GASCO OR RANCHO VISTOSO 3. WATER SETTLE BACKFl1 PVC NE 4. BUD LINT SHALL BE LOCATED AT GRADE 0 TREE ROOT BALL NEIGHBORHOOD 7, PARCEL I 6. FOLLOW YANUFACIUER'S NSiRUCRONS FOR ARBORTAPE NSTALLA110L 1 ICK COUPLER r6FTco W.1(TDo4-s44s EMITTER PLACEMENT FOR CD SCALE NT5 GOLDEN RANCH FIRE STATION �, BEING A PORTION IN THE S E. 1/4 OF SECTION 36. J OO TREE PLAPfTING GROUPED PLANTS b TREES TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, �' T SCALE NIT G.&S.R.M., TOWN OF OR0 VALLEY,PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA o � ` TUTS CONTOUR INTERVAL 1' Z REVISED DATE: 21 APRIL00 REVISED DATE: 21 JULY 00 j 0V12-00-06 a w —� EngFneering Planning Surveying No. Sat° Hsm NTS Rc.� The landscape Architecture Urban Design GOLDEN RANCH FIRE DEPARTMENT LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS Seet. (U \♦. Shed o WLBOffices located in Tucson, Phoenix /0 �s N°•199071—A-001Victor aey,Cast Brood wayRevisions °} O i 0*H acD r— 03 R. NVTV y c P 4 $ V i S+ P. A o p. a P . Y N - r 111 E ii ilea i 4 11 1 5 gi 1 , ; �" 0 g 03 1 11 d PIP ii q Oig g A 1 4 9 1 i 1 411 0 . P g A gi: a !! plx; 11; 1 g le, g lid r 1 `e i' al A 1 7 ,$ Mi 1 Ad 1 li 1 11 1 ii ; 41 ,i 41! il il € gA1 _ ! sG i d i i i ! dtp ii fl g100 1 m 2 PM 1: ; !I / g84 q le; v s'A gi ; : 1 !O m ; m ! 1! ;i Pis 11 t,gi ! e ' /8 U 1 1 4 gl 1 ill g.„, TA 1 sA m 4 Ili i ; ; g gib r i$ '2 $ a yL IA 2Aqi A8 i g Ili "m > 4 1 ! 1 0 12 PA a �=T-- e q 1 lm 4 il m 1 F Agm i a e,,13 ii i 1 yi DO Al tZ R ;., a q i 1 1 1 T 1 ; 4: 4 Ai !;q: 11 11 41 .mop:; 4111 Ei Q oo-o.° > off; "�"i - 2-s £ € 2- � b �g. :14 2 g e $ L / i OPa UJ l sp> a C� < Q q Na] e xQ� ti�2jj > O♦�0tg :02,t . Y o ~ Pilyioi I �7 I-L 1{ C g' 1 III i il 4 '; IP YO hise0 i'�pJ C 1Q� ?c18pC); SS V A �l a A 1qq1 ii 1 g� pi g • ! V N x • QQ s F i- - . c� w in o {� P T •" t^ 00 P r r F P ." 1^ c G� P T fills ; Ii i Ali 1 U31 P k 1 A g Al014.9 14 1 it ii fl 11418 il 1 l / F hi % o cdq 11 i;8' . 8 R _ sir 61 IP i < Ilx 1 i € A 4 A''1; a n P� j Al ; /€1 44 z ti t 4; 1> it _ ' P4 5 ; 1 p ! l� NIA; q2 A! g g 50 , P1; _; '4 >� ]!; $: e A €ill of i 4 ;, ,� i s I t 5i it 4 4 4� 1 x _ 0 !� eliie 1 l> ;AI I 1b01 Ili 8 I 1��>� > q111� ,� A 1 o42'1 I : 0; I 1 P ? iiP z P ilk L liA w Al 4 P 11 .11i 011 8 1 i ; ! 4 el xiell A 1 4 1 % 6 :414 11 1 14 1 4 bl 141 " Pi 1 I4 11 f L /1g1 4 fl !1:1 Pi' ! 0 viiiE '' 1 i ! 1 d 1 481 lefili N il 1 ; : W:il q r ; 0/ e L1 ;xi Z ;91 iii liF ii I : 1 1 1; i NI O9 igi ;11 iOd; li 4 & i p PI 0 014 1: r A q p 22 l > P -f 1 ;" :5 N RAs1 111 k 'l h ~ glgg iTyJ 4m L g �a A 1 1 7 • . N I ,j p co r n P r ' /IN 1 3 11 IP/ I a ' Ill ! l Pill is ;I: ;Igi ii;g P;11/11 141 1;X%Xli 11 1 1/ ;! 1 1/1 !11 il 1 4 1111511 PI 411!!! 11 q iX1 1 4 1 A h 1 ! 11 qT"i i" /1 gTili! 91 9 A gisi $10 1g 1. Notiql li; !;114 on. i i l P 42'41°21 8 14111g 408 9 4X4; P 4 4x7 ; hliq :AA egg Wm i8P PIN L 11 d! Illg gg -A.: 1 ir;:!:$ 11F 4IP/ 1 TeAlm 41 Om 1 4 1 #Fr 11 ail himi ! ;Ix ;6 11 M 111 A :11 ii g 1 14 4$ 42! 1APO111 I Ax; ' �� 0 i ;iA 1 PI III gili! li IP Pi Iii 6 'I April; IA 14,1;A 444 M e /1 IX" 11111 i 11 8!! rill; L 5111 qAil i 4451m PO iNXIA!! ; ill 1 M; i! 01 i 150 /1 1 li A; 41 q g ;IIri ;114 liXP:i gl 14: $ 1 21 i _ l_p *21/P 4; $>6 A iRLAP �>1 ! ! 14 1 A 0' PI � 84 M of A f i 3 1 i I ' 11 ' r s R Z ? f �/y7 %, .� � � A m 1'1 0 �1 Aa : o1>C:1. . D v v g'ii >01El'-E 01 0 j>u\m 8 - N 0� r w Z➢ - O L:199071/LANDSCAPE PLAN/071LS-6 GOLDER RANCH FIRE DEPT.,RV,N-7,P-I,8-8-2000 MINUTES ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION SEPTEMBER 13,2000 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION CALL TO ORDER 6:05 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Paul Loomis, Mayor Fran LaSala, Vice Mayor Dick Johnson, Council Member Werner Wolff, Council Member Bart Rochman, Council Member EXECUTIVE SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM MOTION: Council Member Rochman MOVED to go into Executive Session at 6:05 p.m. for the following purpose: 1. Pursuant to ARS 38-431.03(A)(3) Legal Advice& (A)(7) acquisition of real property regarding Midvale Farms Water Company 2. Pursuant to ARS 38-431.03(A)(3) Legal Advice regarding Resolution No. (R)94- 53 Annexation Development Agreement for the Wong property 3. Pursuant to ARS 38-431.03(A)(3) Legal Advice regarding Casas Adobes Incorporation Committee request to incorporate Council Member Johnson SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —O. In addition to the Mayor and Council, the Town Manager, the Town Clerk and the Town Attorney, Water Utility Director Alan Forrest was present for Item 1 and Mr. Spencer Smith was present for Item 2. MOTION: Council Member Johnson MOVED to go out of Executive Session at 7:25 p.m. Vice Mayor LaSala SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5—0. RESUME REGULAR SESSION CALL TO ORDER 7:35 p.m. ROLL CALL Paul Loomis, Mayor Fran LaSala, Vice Mayor Dick Johnson, Council Member Werner Wolff, Council Member Bart Rochman, Council Member 09/13/00 Minutes, Council Regular Session 2 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Loomis led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS Town Manager Chuck Sweet reviewed the upcoming meetings. He also announced that the Town would be holding a Public Workshop on September 19th at 7:00 p.m. to discuss the Town-wide Drainage Study. CALL TO AUDIENCE Henry Suozzi, 11733 Mandarin Lane, explained that as a member of the 25th Anniversary Committee, he researched and compiled a history of the Town of Oro Valley since its incorporation. Mr. Suozzi presented the Council with a booklet containing his articles. He also presented the Mayor and the Town a scrapbook he compiled about Oro Valley's history. He thanked Town staff for their assistance on the project. 1. CONSENT AGENDA At the request of Council Member Wolff, Mayor Loomis pulled Item E from the Consent Agenda. MOTION: Council Member Johnson MOVED to APPROVE the Consent Agenda with the exception of Item E. Vice Mayor LaSala SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —O. A. Minutes— 8-2-00; 8-14-00 B. Approval of the 2000 Annual Town Council Retreat Report/Minutes 8-5- 00 Study Session C. Acceptance of Budget & Bond Committee Report for fiscal year ended June 30, 2000 D. Award of Bid—Project No. W21-2000—Site and Landscape Improvements for Water Plant No. 18 (located on the south side of Naranja Road west of North First Avenue)to Falcone Brothers & Associates in the amount of$89,042 E. Resolution No. (R)00-84 Approval of the application for additional funding for transit via House Bill 2565 (aka Senate Bill 1556, aka Local Transportation Assistance Funds II) (PULLED FOR DISCUSSION) F. Resolution No. (R)00-85 License Agreement for the installation and maintenance of landscaping elements within public rights-of-way in Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 10, Parcels 0, P, Q and R G. Acceptance of Agreement with El Tour de Tucson for the 2000 El Tour de Tucson Bicycle Ride and to waive all related fees H. Final Report on Emergency Repairs to Well C-5 (located on the south side of Naranja Road west of North First Avenue) t , 09/13/00 Minutes, Council Regular Session 3 E. RESOLUTION NO. (R)00-84 APPROVAL OF THE APPLICATION FOR ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR TRANSIT VIA HOUSE BILL 2565 (AKA SENATE BILL 1556,AKA LOCAL TRANSPORTATION ASSISTANCE FUNDS II In response to a question from Council Member Wolff, Transit Services Administrator John Zukas explained that the Town's portion of the match monies would be in the amount of$21,383.03. He explained that the match is a 20/80 split but the Town's portion is based on the total amount of the project, which is $106,915.13. MOTION: Council Member Wolff MOVED to APPROVE Resolution (R)00-84 approving the submittal of the application of the House Bill 2565 grant, with the understanding that the Town will be responsible for certifying annually that the expenditures have been and are being expended on the proposed project(s). Council Member Rochman SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —O. 2. PRESENTATION OF AWARD TO KEYON FAREGHI,2000 ARIZONA D.A.R.E. POSTER WINNER Officer Joanne Wilson reported that Ms. Keyon Fareghi , a student at Copper Creek Elementary School, won First Place in the local and statewide D.A.R.E. Poster Contests. Mayor Loomis, Chief Sharp and Officer Wilson then presented Keyon with a plaque provided by the Arizona D.A.R.E. Officer Association. Keyon was also presented an Award of Excellence from Mayor Loomis and Chief Sharp and a D.A.R.E. polo shirt and jacket provided by the Oro Valley Police Department. Mayor Loomis moved Item 9 forward on the agenda. 9. DISCUSSION AND/OR POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING RESOLUTION (R)94-53 ANNEXATION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE WONG PROPERTY Town Attorney Dan Dudley stated that he referred this item to Outside Legal Counsel. He explained that it has been suggested that the parties work together to resolve the issues regarding Resolution (R)94-53. Mr. Dudley recommended that Council table the item for an indefinite period of time. MOTION: Vice Mayor LaSala MOVED to TABLE this issue for an indefinite period of time and directed Town Manager Chuck Sweet and his office to set up a meeting with the parties. Vice Mayor LaSala stated that he would attend the meetings personally to make sure that it gets done and to see where we can meet on said issues. Council Member Rochman SECONDED the motion. DISCUSSION: Council Member Johnson explained that he asked to have the item placed on the agenda. He stated that he felt that it was a situation in which a mistake was 09/13/00 . Minutes, Council Regular Session 4 made in 1994 and the error needs to be corrected. He stated that he understood that there were a lot of issues involved, but he would like Council to take a look at the issue and correct the mistakes. Council Member Rochman stated that the best way to resolve the problem was to have the various parties sit down together and negotiate their differences. Motion to Table the item, carried, 4— 1 with Council Member Johnson opposed. 3. APPOINTMENT OF MEMBERS TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR 2 YEAR TERMS TO EXPIRE JUNE 2002 (CONTINUED FROM 8-2-00) MOTION: Vice Mayor LaSala MOVED to APPOINT Bill Moody and William Matsukado to the Planning & Zoning Commission with their terms expiring in June, 2002. Mayor Loomis SECONDED the motion. AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION: Council Member Rochman MOVED to AMEND the motion to also appoint Martha Briggs. Council Member Johnson SECONDED the motion. Motion as amended carried, 3 —2 with Mayor Loomis and Vice Mayor LaSala opposed. 4. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING —ORDINANCE NO. (0)00-23 PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED, CHAPTER 10, SECTION 10-7 CORRECTING THE RIPARIAN HABITAT PROTECTION OVERLAY DISTRICT MAP (CONTINUED FROM 8- 2-00) Melissa Shaw, Planner II, reviewed an overhead map depicting the areas related to the Riparian Habitat Protection Overlay District Map which was amended in April, 2000. She stated that the amendments were based on new mapping data and information that was received during the mapping process for the Environmentally Sensitive Lands Ordinance. Ms. Shaw explained that during the amendments,there were four areas that were entitled mesquite bosques (and degraded mesquite bosques) and were added to the Riparian Habitat Map. She further explained that the term `mesquite bosque' was not actually one of the classifications listed in the text of the ESL Ordinance, so clarification was obtained from the biologists that were hired to prepare the Environmentally Sensitive Lands Study. The biologists and staff recommend that the four areas be classified as `riparian habitat.' Dr. Bill Shaw, Biologist, explained that his task in working with the Town staff on the ESL Ordinance, was to identify the areas that are biologically important to Oro Valley and surrounding areas. He reviewed the Riparian Habitat Map and areas that are most important to the Town including Honey Bee Canyon, Big Wash, Canada del Oro Wash as major drainage systems, major riparian systems and supporters of biological productivity 09/13/00 Minutes, Council Regular Session 5 and diversity. Dr. Shaw explained that the terminology is at issue and he and staff recommend that the four areas as represented on the map be listed as intermediate xeroriparian areas (and not mesquite or degraded mesquite bosques.) Discussion followed regarding the areas being in the 100 Year Flood Plain, the areas being sensitive and valuable,the fact that the classification would not prohibit development but identifies sensitive areas that would require that Riparian Habitat Study and Mitigation Plans be submitted, preservation and protection of the bio-diverse areas. In response to a question from Council Member Rochman, Melissa Shaw explained that the three areas (in purple) represented on the Riparian Map are being recommended to be listed as intermediate xeroriparian and the one area on the map (in blue) be listed as mesoriparian. In response to a question from Vice Mayor LaSala, Dr. Shaw explained that their task was to inform Council of which areas in the Town were of the most importance from the standpoint of preserving bio-diversity. Those recommendations were based on vegetative richness, higher productivity, species diversity, and structural diversity. David Williams, The WLB Group, representing Vistoso Partners, stated that they agree with the recommended changes and their intent was to preserve wildlife corridors and biological communities within the area. He also explained that Vistoso Partners retained two biologists (Richard Glinski and Michael Cross)to examine the area and they are in agreement with the recommended changes to xeroriparian designation. Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. Brady Buckley, 11526 N. Civano Place, stated that many species of wildlife have been killed off over the years. He stated that the diversity of plant and animal life in the wash areas was tremendous and he was in favor of protecting the plant and animal life in the area. Kevin Krauss, 1419 W. Oak Shadows, asked that the area be kept as it is and there be no development allowed in the area. Richard Glinski, Biologist, stated that he has worked with Thomas Olsen and Associates who were retained by Vistoso Partners to study the area. He stated that it is everyone's intent to protect the wildlife in the area and the area could actually be enhanced to improve the riparian vegetation. Mayor Loomis closed the public hearing. MOTION: Vice Mayor LaSala MOVED to APPROVE OV7-00-01, the corrections to the Riparian Habitat Protection Overlay Map changing the area titled mesquite bosque (blue area on the map)to be identified as mesoriparian and the three degraded mesquite bosques (purple areas on the map) to intermediate xeroriparian. Council Member 09/13/00 Minutes, Council Regular Session 6 Rochman SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —0. (Mr. David Williams representing Vistoso Partners, and Melissa Shaw and Dr. Shaw representing the Town agreed that the motion correctly identified the changes.) Mayor Loomis recessed the meeting at 8:30 p.m. The meeting resumed at 8:45 p.m. 5. RECOMMENDATION FROM PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD REGARDING APPOINTMENTS TO THE ORO VALLEY TRAILS TASK FORCE WITH TERMS TO EXPIRE AUGUST 2001 MOTION: Council Member Johnson MOVED to APPOINT Bill Adler, Karen Baker (as the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board representative and Chair), Stanley Bingham, Charles LeForge, Rosemary Minter, Sally Sanders and Joseph Winfield to the Trails Task Force with their terms expiring August 2001. Council Member Wolff SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —O. 6. RESOLUTION (R)00-87 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL CONSENTING TO THE INCORPORATION OF THE VILLAGE OF CASAS ADOBES AS PER REQUEST RECEIVED FROM THE CASAS ADOBES INCORPORATION COMMITTEE Town Attorney Dan Dudley reported that Resolution (R)00-87 would provide approval of the new effort for the incorporation of the Village of Casas Adobes. He explained that the resolution (as amended) would provide a replication of the City of Tucson's action on the incorporation effort. He stated that the key components to the amended resolution provide that any violation of the resolution makes the Town's consent null and void. It also provides that the Town agrees to not annex any portion of the proposed Casas Adobes map during the period up to March 31, 2001. In response to a question from Vice Mayor LaSala regarding the "downside to the Town of Oro Valley just approving the incorporation of Casas Adobes with no conditions," Mr. Dudley explained that the Town would be providing for the ability of Casas Adobes to incorporate into the future or until Oro Valley rescinds or annexes. MOTION: Vice Mayor LaSala MOVED to approve to give the Town of Oro Valley's permission to the incorporation of the Village of Casas Adobes and strike everything after the title in Resolution (R)00-87. Council Member Wolff SECONDED the motion. Discussion followed regarding: • Not being able to control things that are out of our control • Not placing conditions on the incorporation • Casas Adobes being committed to their incorporation • Wanting Casas Adobes to exist as a community and working with them as part of the Northwest Coalition • Impact to Oro Valley's budget (approximately $250,000) verses the value to the area 09/13/00 Minutes, Council Regular Session 7 ■ Timing of petitions being filed and possible election date Leo Koester, representing Casas Adobes, stated that they need to file their petitions by November 13th in order to meet the requirements of the Pima County Election's Office for verifying signatures. CALL FOR THE QUESTION: Motion failed, 1 —4, with Mayor Loomis, Council Member Johnson, Council Member Wolff and Council Member Rochman opposed. MOTION: Council Member Johnson MOVED to approve Resolution (R)00-87 as amended reflecting that which the City of Tucson passed. Mayor Loomis SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 3 —2 with Vice Mayor LaSala and Council Member Rochman opposed. 7. OV12-99-12 RANCHO VISTOSO PROFESSIONAL OFFICES DEVELOPMENT PLAN, NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION, SALVAGE AND MITIGATION AND LANDSCAPE PLANS, LOCATED IN NEIGHBORHOOD 5, PARCEL - S AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD AND ARROWSMITH DRIVE Community Development Director Brent Sinclair reported that the proposed development of the Rancho Vistoso Professional Offices complex would be five single-story office buildings. He explained that the site is approximately 3.9 acres in size and is in C-1 zoning of the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development (PAD). Mr. Sinclair explained that the development plan as presented conforms to the Town's Zoning Code Revised and the General Plan. Staff and the Development Review Board recommended approval with the conditions as listed in Exhibit "A." Mr. John Keith, owner and developer of the proposed office complex, reviewed overheads and drawings of the complex. He explained that they are proposing to build out 30,000 square feet with three buildings at 4,750 square feet and two buildings at 7,600 square feet. Mr. Keith stated that they agree to all the conditions as presented by staff in Exhibit"A." MOTION: Council Member Johnson MOVED to APPROVE OV 12-99-12 Rancho Vistoso 5S Professional Offices Development Plan,Native Plant Preservation, Salvage and Mitigation Plan and Landscape Plan with those conditions as listed in Exhibit "A". A) 1. The WAPA license agreement shall be modified to include permission for the grading and detention facility. All exhibits to the agreement shall be submitted with the modified agreement. 2. Correct labeling of Arrowsmith Road to Arrowsmith Drive. 3. Correct the notation on Arrowsmith Drive from "new sign"to "new sidewalk". A 09/13/00 Minutes, Council Regular Session 8 4. A notation shall be added to the development plan stating: "Light fixtures shall be low- pressure sodium,with poles not to exceed the building height". 5. Final approval from Pima County Addressing shall be obtained prior to issuance of grading permits. 6. A bond in the amount of$6,300 will be posted as an in-lieu fee for improvements to the portion of WAPA recreation trail on this property, prior to the issuance of grading permits. The bond will expire in 10 years. 7. The design of the covered parking structures must be approved by the DRB prior to issuing a permit for those structures. 8. Add the following notation to the Native Plant Preservation, Salvage and Mitigation Plan: The zoning inspector shall determine the final disposition of the significant vegetation, and those deemed to be removed from site shall be given special consideration for salvage through boxing. Notations shall be added to the plant inventory indicating which trees will be spaded and which boxed. 9. Public Art shall be approved by Town Council prior to issuance of the building permit. 10. All signage within the office complex must be uniform in color and design. 11. One 3.5" data diskette or CD containing the parcel lines and boundaries, dimensions and street names shall be submitted with 2 mylar copies of the approved and corrected development plan,prior to issuance of grading permits. 12. Label the header curb at the south edge of the parking area near the detention pond. 13. The proposed retention basin shall include design features to adequately pass runoff from storms larger than the 5-year event up to the 100-year event. 14. The applicant's engineer shall provide a 404 compliance statement regarding the necessity of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permit(s). 15. End treatments, other than exposed fill, shall be required around the diameter of all proposed culvert pipes. 16. The proposed retention pond volume shall be shown on the development plan. 17. Pond routing calculations for the detention basin shall be provided in the drainage report. 18. Cross-section C-C on the development plan shows the bottom of the detention basin to be at the 2816.5' elevation while the plan view and drainage report indicate the bottom to be at elevation 2816.0. The appropriate revisions shall be made. 19. On page 5 of the drainage report the first half of the first sentence of the first paragraph is missing. 20. Complete the rating of the culvert on p 14 for the two 24-inch culverts at the Rancho Vistoso Blvd driveway is incomplete. 21. The flow rate used for the overflow weir design shall be from a pond routing. 22. The applicant's engineer shall include a revised drainage report addressing the above comments with the next review submittal. Before the drainage report is revised a scoping meeting shall be held with Town staff. 23. The proposed detention concept is acceptable. However, the proposed design needs work. The engineer shall work with Town staff to prepare a design that is in conformance with the Floodplain Management Ordinance. Council Member Rochman SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —O. 09/13/00 Minutes, Council Regular Session 9 8. OV12-00-06 GOLDER RANCH FIRE STATION NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION, SALVAGE AND MITIGATION AND LANDSCAPE PLANS, LOCATED WITHIN RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 7, SOUTH SIDE OF WOODBURNE AVENUE AND EAST OF THE WESTERN AREA POWER AUTHORITY (WAPA) EASEMENT MOTION: Council Member Rochman MOVED to APPROVE OV 12-00-06, Golder Ranch Fire Station in Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 7I, which includes Native Plant Preservation, Salvage and Mitigation and Landscape Plans. Council Member Wolff SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —O. TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT Town Manager Chuck Sweet reported that the 2000/2001 Town Budget is now published. He also re-announced that the Town would be holding a public workshop on Tuesday, September 19th at 7:00 p.m. regarding town-wide drainage. CALL TO AUDIENCE—No speakers. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Vice Mayor LaSala MOVED to ADJOURN at 9:25 p.m. Council Member Johnson SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —O. Respectfully submitted, Roxana Garrity,Deputy Town Cler17 I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the regular session of the Town of Oro Valley Council of Oro Valley, Arizona held on the 13th day of September,2000. I further certify that the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present. Dated this SA day of ° ,2000. Kath E. Cuvelier, CMC Town Clerk Oct .05 00 02: 30p p, 1 . • MOLDER RANCH FIRE DISTRICT ' - , , 3535 E.Hawser St. `` �`"" ' Tucson,Arizona 85739 V . / _ (520)825-9001 FAX(520)825-8043 `13- JOHN FINK,CHIEF FAX COVER SHEET TO: i1,v 'rlk- TOFAX#: ) Li .- f0D- . FROM: Golder Ranch Fire District Administration DATE: /o- s-0© SUBJECT: P4 J a f et4ig 'ell_ i . . NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER: 3 COMNrENTs. r / vie4. Qr . .,,-, Lt) ! .494,..4.4, 7ite ZooD IZ tOk4ei l flejtap, .1)4,k.. cc,,,,, ...0+ r ?ci'l Ac idea.a (24, / /s/SL geS-73, 9 54L/ Sagebrush Design Matthew Moutafic 3933 East 29th St. Tucson,AZ 85711 �� rf% 1/74/A'L ,� 520.5141983 /�e/7 ��yo�iv1A%f�i(/� jax520-514-1983 407b /o/ Vov /1411 ��/7/6- .1 Ordere414.V r yPtJ .1-Az Piiifre- 4.1"7/ 24, Atr/le tz�0� MEMORANDUM November 10, 2000 TO: David Ronquillo, Planner Tech FROM: Gigi Miller,Public Art Review Committee SUBJECT: Rancho Vistoso Fire Station The Public Art Review Committee has reviewed and approved the art work for the Rancho Vistoso Fire Station. Gigi Miller David Grigsby Harriet Hough Public Art Review Committee F `• • • . TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: December 6,2000 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: David Ronquillo, Planner Technician SUBJECT: OV12-00-06 PUBLIC ART PROPOSED FOR THE GOLDER RANCH FIRE STATION, AT RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 7 PARECEL I, LOCATED ON WOODBURNE AVE. BACKGROUND/SUMMARY: Matthew Moutafis of Sagebrush Design requests Town Council approval for the public art proposed at the Golder Ranch Fire Station located at 12125 N. Woodburne Ave. in Rancho Vistoso. The building will consist of 6,900 square feet, including the building pad and garage area. The groundbreaking for construction is proposed to be in the near future. Per Sec. 4-504F of the OVZCR, all new commercial related projects shall contribute 1% of the project cost towards public art. The need for public art was established in the Development Plan, which was approved by the Town Council on May 17, 2000. The Public Art Review Committee (PARC) reviewed and approved the proposed public art on November 10, 2000, and an approval letter is attached. Matthew Moutafis has been selected as the contracting artist for the fire station. The proposal agreement between the artist and developer was signed on September 15, 2000. The finished mosaic panels should be completed by March 15, 2001. PUBLIC ART PROPOSAL: The Oro Valley Public Art Review Committee and the applicant have agreed to a mosaic art display for the Golder Ranch fire station. The mosaics will include symbols and elements unique to fire fighting tools and paraphernalia. The artwork will be located outside the front entranceway, so all visitors will be able to view the artwork mounted on a wall facing Woodburne Ave. There will be four mosaic panels, each 3 feet x 3 feet•in size. They will be anchored into a masonry wall adjacent to the front entrance of the fire station. Each will consist of a Venician glass tile, individual tiles are 3 inch x 3 inch and other cut pieces. There will be approximately 10,000 tiles used on all four-mosaic panels. The mosaic will include a full color range (including gold metallic and silver toned tile) with standard grout and a protective finish coating. These tiles will be contained within a steel frame understructure. The steel understructure and framed edging will be powder painted similar to the exterior accent color of the firehouse. A layout of the proposal has been included and will blend in with the structure and design of the fire station. COMPLIANCE WITH ORDINANCE (0) 00-19 AMMENDING ARTICLE 4-504F OF OVZCR: The total project cost for the building is approximately $700,000. The total art project proposal will be $8,500, which exceeds the 1% requirement. Each piece will have an accompanying plaque, which will include the following information as required by OVZCR: Oro Valley Public Art Permanent Collection F:\OV\OV 12\2000\12-00-06\0V 12-00-06 RV FIRE public art.doc TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page2 of 2 Title of the art Name of the artist Date RECOMMENDATION: The proposed art contribution will enhance the design of the building. Staff recommends approval of the proposed Public Art for the Golder Ranch fire station. SUGGESTED MOTIONS: I move to approve OV 12-00-06 Public Art for the Golder Ranch Fire station, with those conditions listed in Exhibit"A", attached herewith. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Reduced Copies of the Proposed Public Art 2. Public Art Review Committee letter of approval Plannl d Zoning Administrator Community Development Director Town Manager F:\ov\ov12\2000\12-00-06\0V12-00-06 RV FIRE public art.doc • EXHIBIT "A" TOWN COUNCIL CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL OV12-00-06 PROPOSAL FOR PUBLIC ART, GOLDER RANCH FIRE STATION 1. Per Section 4-504F.4 of the OVZCR, completion and installation of the artwork is required before a Certificate of Occupancy may be issued. • (I �1I �IIIlllllll �llilflllllll1111111111111 [ I111111 �1111 �1 �1 [ I ! I1 ( lllil [ 11111111111 L -t -0° -- -- -- - -- \ TOW A.F.F. {1 LJ-J I I I I I I I 1 1L 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ell 11 I 1 " 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ` 'V�:lL1c, F`R►T 0-0 _ 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 r H FIN.FLR. / fir I'-4" 44'-2" LEFT SIDE ELEVATION 11/SITE WALL SHOI G ` SGALE,3,1b'= MEMORANDUM November 10, 2000 TO: David Ronquillo, Planner Tech FROM: Gigi Miller,Public Art Review Committee SUBJECT: Rancho Vistoso Fire Station The Public Art Review Committee has reviewed and approved the art work for the Rancho Vistoso Fire Station. Gigi Miller David Grigsby Harriet Hough Public Art Review Committee MINUTES ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION DECEMBER 6,2000 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION CALL TO ORDER 6:02 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Paul Loomis, Mayor Fran LaSala, Vice Mayor Dick Johnson, Council Member Bart Rochman, Council Member Werner Wolff, Council Member EXECUTIVE SESSION MOTION: A MOTION was made by Council Member Rochman and SECONDED by Council Member Wolff to go into Executive Session at 6:02 p.m. for the following purpose: 1. Pursuant to ARS 38-431.03 (A)(3) Legal Advice regarding 1996 Agreement between Vistoso Partners, et al & Town of Oro Valley 2. Pursuant to ARS 38-431.03 (A)(3) Legal Advice regarding a lease of Town owned real property by Comcast Cable Company 3. Pursuant to ARS 38-431.03 (A)(3) Legal Advice regarding Tucson Water Issues Motion carried, 5 —0. Mayor Loomis announced that in addition to the Town Council, the Town Manager,the Town Clerk, and the Town Attorney, Water Utility Director Alan Forrest would be present in Executive Session for Items 1 and 3. MOTION: A MOTION was made by Vice Mayor LaSala and SECONDED by Council Member Johnson to go out of Executive Session at 7:20 p.m. Motion carried, 5 —0. RESUME REGULAR SESSION CALL TO ORDER 7:25 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Paul Loomis, Mayor Fran LaSala, Vice Mayor Dick Johnson, Council Member Bart Rochman, Council Member Werner Wolff, Council Member 12/06/00 Minutes,Council Regular Session 2 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Loomis led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS Town Manager Chuck Sweet reviewed the upcoming meetings and events. Mayor Loomis changed the order of the Agenda by moving Items 4, 9, and 11 forward on the Agenda to follow Item 2. CALL TO AUDIENCE Jim Kreigh, 40 E. Calle Concordia, presented a brief background on the portion of Calle Concordia between Calle Buena Vista and Calle Loma Linda. He explained that in 1970 before Oro Valley was incorporated, Pima County wanted to widen the street but the citizens in the area requested that it be left as is. Mr. Kreigh explained that the trail on the south side of Calle Concordia was enhanced but the citizens were told that the street would remain as is. He explained that he was offering this information to Council since there had been discussion on the streets in that area. 1. CONSENT AGENDA At the request of Vice Mayor LaSala, Mayor Loomis pulled Items D and H from the Consent Agenda. MOTION: Vice Mayor LaSala MOVED to approve the Consent Agenda with the exception of Items D and H. Council Member Johnson SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 — 0. A. Minutes— 10/30/00, 11/13/00 B. Budget and Bond Committee Report to Council for Quarter Ended September 30, 2000 C. Parks & Recreation Monthly Status Report—November 2000 D. Approval of request to extend terms of the Fire Advisory Board to May 16, 2001 (PULLED FOR DISCUSSION) E. Resolution No. (R)00-103 Approval of an Intergovernmental Agreement between the Town of Oro Valley and Pima County for Street Naming and Addressing Services, 2000 F. OV12-00-06 Approval of public art proposed for the Golder Ranch Fire Station, at Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 7, Parcel I, located on Woodburne Avenue G. Award of Bid - Four-wheel drive compact utility tractor to Burns-White Machinery, Inc. in the amount of$26,088.30 i 4 12/06/00 Minutes,Council Regular Session 3 H. Approval of recommendation from the Parks & Recreation Advisory Board to sponsor the Cactus Speed Classic V (in-line skating marathon) in Oro Valley on November 4, 2001 (PULLED FOR DISCUSSION) D. APPROVAL OF REQUEST TO EXTEND TERMS OF THE FIRE ADVISORY BOARD TO MAY 16, 2001 Vice Mayor LaSala stated that he felt that the Fire Advisory Board was doing a good job, but he had some ideas that he would like to present to the Council. He asked to continue the approval of the Fire Advisory Board extensions until January in order to allow him some time to pull his ideas together. MOTION: Vice Mayor LaSala MOVED to CONTINUE the approval of the extension of the Fire Advisory Board terms to the first meeting in January (January 17th.) Council Member Johnson SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —O. H. APPROVAL OF RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PARKS & RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD TO SPONSOR THE CACTUS SPEED CLASSIC V (IN-LINE SKATING MARATHON) IN ORO VALLEY ON NOVEMBER 4, 2001 Vice Mayor LaSala stated that he thought sponsoring the Cactus Speed Classic V was a great opportunity for Oro Valley. He asked that staff brief the Council and public on the event. Parks and Recreation Administrator Ainsley Reeder introduced Diane Coonce, Race Director. Ms. Coonce explained that the Cactus Speed Classic is an in-line skating marathon that has been held for four years. She stated that the Classic helps raise funds for the Pima County College and Tohono O'odham Community College Scholarship Funds. In response to questions from Council, Ms. Coonce explained that the skaters are from many states and countries and it is a great economic development activity for the hosting town. She also stated that the hosting town's name is predominately presented on the literature, and that the Cactus Speed Classic committee works with the Chief of Police to address traffic and safety concerns. MOTION: Vice Mayor LaSala MOVED to APPROVE sponsorship of the Cactus Speed Classic V in Oro Valley on November 4, 2001. Council Member Wolff SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —0. 2. TOWN COUNCIL ACCEPTANCE OF TOWN FINANCIAL AUDIT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,2000 Craig Trbovich, Cronstom and Trbovich, Certified Public Accountants, stated that the Town of Oro Valley continues to exhibit a strong financial position and a strong financial l2/06/00 Minutes,Council Regular Session 4 growth. He further explained that the Comprehensive Financial Annual Report would be submitted to the Government Finance Officers Association for their annual award and an Expenditure Limitation Report would be filed with the State of Arizona. Also, the Single Audit Report has been issued relating to the Town's Federal Funding. MOTION: Council Member Johnson MOVED to ACCEPT the Town of Oro Valley's Financial Audit for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2000. Vice Mayor LaSala SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 — 0. 4. CONSIDERATION AND/OR POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING AN UPDATE FOR THE FY 2000/2001GREATER TUCSON STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP (GTSPED) FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT LEGISLATIVE ISSUES AND REQUESTING THE TOWN'S SUPPORT OF THE GTSPED LEGISLATIVE PRIORITY ISSUES Economic Development Administrator Jeff Weir reviewed the Council Communication and explained that the Greater Tucson Strategic Partnership for Economic Development (GTSPED) has identified Legislative issues that are important to the residents, businesses, and municipalities within the region. He also explained that the League of Arizona Cities and Towns is also supporting the issues being identified as the Enterprise Zone Program and Workforce Development (School-to-Work Program.) At the request of Council Member Johnson, Mr. Bob Hagan, 7311 N. Sony Way, member of the Legislative Agenda Working Group, reviewed the following: ➢ Capital Formation (Creates a state supported venture capital fund) ➢ Business Tax Reform (Sales factor and Enterprise Zone Program) ➢ Workforce Development (Training programs and School-to-Work Program) ➢ Cluster Funding (Increase funding for industry clusters) Council Member Rochman stated that these programs would encourage businesses to relocate their facilities to Arizona. This would provide an advantage to the region and the state. In response to concerns from Mayor Loomis regarding the fact that funding for the programs was not identified, Mr. Hagen explained that there was some financial support but further identification was needed. Mr. Weir explained that the Greater Tucson Economic Council (GTEC) is currently working on the funding recommendations and will bring those recommendations back for Council's review. MOTION: Council Member Johnson MOVED to AUTHORIZE the Mayor to sign a letter addressed to Mr. Larry Aldrich, GTSPED Co-Chairperson, expressing the Town's support of the GTSPED Legislative Priority Issues with the additional comment that GTSPED identify where funds will be coming from on all issues. Council Member Rochman SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 — 0. 12/06/00 Minutes,Council Regular Session 5 9. RESCHEDULING THE TOWN COUNCIL MEETING FROM DECEMBER 20,2000 TO DECEMBER 18, 2000 AND CANCELING THE JANUARY 3, 2001 TOWN COUNCIL MEETING MOTION: Vice Mayor LaSala MOVED to change the Town Council Meeting from December 20th to December 18th and to cancel the January 3`1 Town Council Meeting. Council Member Rochman SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —0. 11.ACTION RELATING TO THE POSSIBLE RELOCATION OF THE ORO VALLEY LIBRARY PROJECT FROM NARANJA/LA CANADA DRIVE TO THE COPPER CREEK RIDGE PARK LOCATION (SOUTH OF COPPER CREEK SCHOOL) AND/OR THE NARANJA TOWN SITE PROPERTY Town Manager Chuck Sweet explained that due to the desire of the Council to consider a secondary access point to the library off of Naranja Drive,the project is at a point to expend funding to the engineering of said access. He stated that it is time to commit to the project or consider other options. Community Development Director Brent Sinclair reported that the building plans for the new library are now 90-95 percent complete and staff will be ready to go out for bid in about 30—45 days. He explained that the addition of the access from Naranja Drive would take approximately 60 days to get that portion of the project out to bid. Mr. Sinclair then reviewed the pros and cons of the current site proposed for the library located north of Town Hall, the Naranja Town Site, and the Copper Creek Ridge Park. Discussion followed regarding time delays, Pima County funding for the library project and the Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) being site specific. Mayor Loomis recessed the meeting at 8:25 p.m. The meeting resumed at 8:40 p.m. The Mayor opened the floor for public comment. The following persons expressed their concerns for moving the library and their strong desire to proceed with the project at the current site: Henry Suozzi, 11733 Mandarin Lane Marilyn Barnhart, 13058 N. Sunrise Canyon Lane Jayne Kuennemuir, 14128 N. Fawnbrooke Mary Anne Schumacher, 1421 E. Rams Hill Drive Alisdair Innes, 10270 N. Carristo Drive The following spoke in favor of the Naranja Town Site as an alternative site for the library for reasons cited as parking, traffic, and a better-suited site: Bill Adler, 10720 N. Eagle Eye Place Jim Kriegh, 40 E. Calle Concordia 12/06/00 Minutes, Council Regular Session 6 Further discussion by the Council followed regarding: ➢ Keeping focused on the project ➢ Being open to change ➢ Providing a better library site ➢ Opportunities of the Naranja Town Site ➢ Emotions and time already invested in the project ➢ Concerns regarding Pima County funding and IGA ➢ Residents expectations for the library ➢ Amount of time needed to develop a Master Plan for the Naranja Town Site ➢ Making sure that the Town does the right thing with available monies MOTION: Vice Mayor LaSala MOVED to CONTINUE consideration of the library site for one month and direct staff to investigate whether it is feasible or to the Town's advantage to move the library to another location and bring back their recommendations to Council in January. Mayor Loomis SECONDED the motion. Motion FAILED, 2 to 3 with Council Member Johnson, Council Member Wolff and Council Member Rochman opposed. Mayor Loomis recessed the meeting at 9:17 p.m. The meeting resumed at 9:25 p.m. 3. PUBLIC HEARING- REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A SERIES 09 PERSON TRANSFER LIQUOR LICENSE FOR FRY'S FOOD & DRUG #117 LOCATED AT 10450 N. LA CA51ADA DRIVE Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. There being no speakers, the public hearing was closed. MOTION: Vice Mayor LaSala MOVED to APPROVE the request for a Series 09 person transfer liquor license at Fry's Food & Drug Store#117, located at 10450 N. La Canada Drive. Council Member Wolff SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —0. 5. RESOLUTION NO. (R)00-104 APPROVAL OF A LEASE OF TOWN OWNED REAL PROPERTY BY COMCAST CABLE COMPANY Town Attorney Dan Dudley reported that Comcast Cable Company has requested continuance of this item until the December 18th Council meeting. MOTION: Council Member Rochman MOVED to CONTINUE Resolution No. (R)00- 104 until the December 18th Council meeting. Council Member Johnson SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —0. 12/06/00 Minutes,Council Regular Session 7 6. RESOLUTION NO. (R)00-105 OV12-00-20A SETTING POLICY REGARDING DEVELOPMENT IN AREAS WITH SLOPES 25% AND GREATER WITHIN THE RANCHO VISTOSO PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT (PAD) Planning and Zoning Administrator Bryant Nodine reviewed the Council Communication reporting that ambiguity exists in the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development(PAD.) He explained that staff and Vistoso Partners are looking for a policy for the development of all parcels within the Rancho Vistoso PAD which have slopes 25% and greater. Mr.Nodine reviewed the following three areas of ambiguity related to the Rancho Vistoso PAD: ➢ Written text regarding development in slopes 25% and greater and areas identified in the Rancho Vistoso PAD map ➢ The PAD map shows some roads in areas that were determined to have a slope of 25% and greater ➢ Past practices allowed limited development in 25% and greater slope areas Mr.Nodine then reviewed the staff recommended criteria for development in areas in the Rancho Vistoso PAD that have slopes 25% and greater: ➢ 25% slope is defined as one that is a minimum of 6 feet vertical from toe to top of edge, and any 25% sloped area greater than thirty feet in any horizontal direction ➢ Grading for roadway shall not cross a 25% or greater sloped area unless no other reasonable alternative routes exist or the road is shown on the Rancho Vistoso PAD map ➢ Grading limits for driveways and building envelopes shall not encroach into areas with slopes 25% and greater for medium high density residential or any lesser density residential developments ➢ Minor encroachments into 25% and greater sloped areas may be allowed in all other land use categories defined in the Rancho Vistoso PAD map ➢ Trade areas are required to offset all encroachments (including roads not designated on the Rancho Vistoso PAD map) of 25% and greater sloped areas on at least a 1:1 ratio and trade area must contain"meaningful open space." (Meaningful open space may be defined as open space that reduces fragmentation, has recreational value, improves overall subdivision design, and creates buffers along environmentally sensitive areas, among other criteria.) Mr. Nodine pointed out that the applicant has requested a change to the last criteria by changing "and creates buffers"to "or creates buffers". He explained that if it was changed to "or"it would allow a trade for recreation area that would not necessarily be natural open space (which has been the past practice.) Mr. Nodine stated that if that was a concern of the Council, then he recommended that the trade area should contain "meaningful, natural open space." He further explained that providing recreational opportunities and the trade that it may create, could be of benefit to the Town. So, it may be best served to keep the "or" and then look at each request on a "case by case" basis. 12/06/00 Minutes,Council Regular Session 8 Discussion followed regarding: ➢ Latest technology used to obtain 25% slope designations and open space on map ➢ Establishing policy so staff, the applicants and the Town knows what information and criteria are being used up front ➢ 25% slope and open space designations identified in Rancho Vistoso PAD ➢ Entitlements in PAD that need to be respected ➢ Looking at each request on a case by case basis Mayor Loomis opened the floor for public input. Charles Hulsey, The WLB Group, stated that in Stone Canyon a 25% slope was measured as 10 feet high by 100 hundred feet in any direction and has been used and established there. He stated that plats that encroached into open space have already been approved but comparable open space on a 1:1 ratio was provided. He also stated that there are times when you need to cross a 25% slope and not all 25°A) slope is significant. Mr. Hulsey agreed that the Town needs to have policy in place that would provide some level of comfort now and into the future. Jim Kriegh, 40 E. Calle Concordia, stated that approximately 23 years ago the "hillside district" was established because it was discovered that a lot of the area around the washes had collapsible soils. The establishment of the hillside district then required analyzing of the soils before homes could be built. He explained that the 25% slope was brought forward for aesthetic reasons but in the hillside district regulations, no one was denied access to their property or were they denied the ability to build. Bill Adler, 10720 N. Eagle Eye Place, stated that he did not feel that interpretation was necessary. He stated that the only section that pertains is the development requirement in the PAD, Section E which states that there shall be no development on 25% or greater. He stated that if an exception needs to be made, then it should go before the Board of Adjustment. In response to questions from Vice Mayor LaSala, Mr. Nodine explained that if one believes that there is ambiguity in the PAD,then an interpretation is required. Staff believes that there is ambiguity. If one believes that there is not ambiguity in the PAD, then a variance would be requested from the Board of Adjustment on a case by case basis. He also explained that even though the PAD says that there will be no development in 25% slopes, it is now being found that there are 25% slopes in areas designated for development. Also, in the past, roads were allowed to go through areas of 25% slopes. Mr. Nodine explained that staff believes that there are criteria in the PAD that are not enforceable by the way that the PAD is written. Further discussion followed regarding: ➢ Setting policy by defining the Rancho Vistoso PAD and essentially defining the Zoning Code ➢ Not providing a blanket carte blanche on the PAD 12/06/00 Minutes,Council Regular Session 9 ➢ Recommendation that any impact to the 25% slope be brought to Council ➢ Further clarification should be requested by applicant as an amendment to the PAD (not as an interpretation) ➢ Providing a degree of certainty to developers, applicants, etc. by defining boundaries and criteria for staff to follow ➢ Ambiguity lies within the PAD map MOTION: Mayor Loomis MOVED to DENY Resolution (R)00-105 OV12-00-20A setting policy regarding development within areas with slopes 25% and greater within the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development (PAD) and to recommend that Vistoso Partners come forward with an amendment if they want further clarification and to continue business as usual. Vice Mayor LaSala SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —O. Mayor Loomis recessed the meeting at 10:43 p.m. The meeting resumed at 10:53 p.m. 7. OV12-87-1B FINAL PLAT AMENDMENT, LA RESERVE (WILDERNESS III), LOCATED APPROXIMATELY ONE-HALF MILE EAST OF THE ORACLE ROAD/LA RESERVE DRIVE INTERSECTION Planning and Zoning Administrator Bryant Nodine reviewed the Council Communication and reported that a Final Plat amendment request has come forward for Wilderness III in the La Reserve Planned Area Development. The request is for a reduction in the front yard setbacks from thirty (30) feet to twenty (20) feet. He explained that there are some very steep slopes in the area with some yards having approximately fifty (50) feet between the property line and the slopes. By changing the front yard setbacks, some encroachment into the hillside would be eliminated. Mr. Nodine further reported that a letter of objection was received from the Homeowners Association(HOA.) A petition from surrounding neighbors objecting to the amendment was also received. Mr. Nodine then explained that he has been in contact with a HOA representative who stated that the HOA would be meeting next week (Thursday, December 14th.) Town staff has requested to meet with them. Mr.Nodine recommended continuance of this item until January 17th to allow staff time to meet with the HOA to discuss the plat amendment. In response to a question from Mayor Loomis, Mr. Nodine explained that the Zoning Code provides for the opportunity for an applicant to go before the Board of Adjustment when they are appealing an administrative decision or if there are problems with how the Code applies to their property. He explained that in this case, it is plat issue, so the applicants could challenge the Planning and Zoning Administrator's decision that it had to be a plat amendment and appeal it to the Board of Adjustment. Mr. Nodine further explained that there would be other properties within the plat that will have the same problem. 12/06/00 Minutes, Council Regular Session 10 Mayor Loomis opened the floor for public input. The following residents spoke against amending the final plat: Nancee Sorenson, 1727 E. Buck Ridge Place Charles Baker, 10456 N. Buck Ridge Drive Katharina Slattery, 1798 E. Placita de la 011a Doug Tupling, 9950 N. Roxberry Drive MOTION: Council Member Johnson MOVED to CONTINUE OV 12-87-I B Final Plat Amendment in La Reserve Wilderness III until January 17th or until after staff meets with the Homeowners Association. Vice Mayor LaSala SECONDED the motion. Mayor Loomis requested that staff provide the Council with information regarding what lots have and have not been developed and which lots would likely be directly impacted by the request. Motion carried 5 —0. 8. DISCUSSION AND/OR POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY POLICY WITH RESPECT TO THE USE OF TOWN FACILITIES FOR TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES Town Manager Chuck Sweet stated that this item was placed on the agenda to re-examine the Town's policy in regard to private businesses leasing space on Town property for telecommunication purposes. He explained that in the past, the Town Council made a decision that Town property should not be used for telecommunication devices and should only be located on private property and in a stealth appearance. Mr. Sweet further explained that the Town has received several complaints from citizens who have experienced "dropped calls" on a regular basis throughout the Town's limits. He reported that he, Vice Mayor LaSala, and Economic Development Administrator Jeff Weir met with several of the cell phone providers to address the providers' needs and their willingness to work with the town on this issue. Brian Mitchell, 1900 W. Canada Hills Drive, Market Director for ATT Wireless and representing the local telecommunications industries, stated that they have met with Vice Mayor LaSala to discuss the poor coverage in the Town. He stated that they all wanted to work with the Town to provide good quality service. Mr. Mitchell then reviewed representations of stealth antenna sites and explained that the industry is creative in hiding their telecommunications equipment. In response to questions from Mayor Loomis and Council Member Johnson, Mr. Mitchell stated that they "co-locate"the stealth antennas whenever possible. However, different carriers have different needs and run on different frequencies, but they have no problem co-locating when they can. 12/06/00 Minutes,Council Regular Session 11 Vice Mayor LaSala explained that staff is already working on pulling together the information needed to bring the item back to Council. He reported that staff and the cell phone providers will be meeting next week to study the issue. He stated that a Town GIS map has already been provided to the interested providers and everyone seems to ready and willing to move forward. MOTION: Vice Mayor LaSala MOVED to direct the Town Manager to return to the Town Council at the February 7, 2001 regular meeting with a Resolution that would establish a new policy for the use of Town of Oro Valley property for wireless telecommunication service in an equitable manner. Additionally,the motion is to include direction to the Town Manager to prepare a Request for Proposal process about this issue that the Council could review on February 7, 2001. Council Member Rochman SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —O. 10. DISCUSSION AND/OR POSSIBLE RESOLUTION NO. (R)00-106 DECLARING THOSE CERTAIN DOCUMENTS, ORO VALLEY TOWN CODE, ARTICLE 11-4, PARKING AND ARTICLE 11-6, COMMERCIAL VEHICLES, A PUBLIC RECORD MOTION: Council Member Johnson MOVED to approve the adoption of Resolution No. (R)00-106. Vice Mayor LaSala SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —0. TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT Town Manager Chuck Sweet reported that the Police Department has started the "Keep Kids Alive, 25"pilot program which places stickers on residential garbage receptacles reminding residents to drive 25 m.p.h. He also reported that there is a Holiday "Giving Tree" located in the lobby of the Police Department that holds tags listing items for needy families. Mayor Loomis thanked staff for their efforts on the Town's Tree Lighting ceremony. CALL TO AUDIENCE No speakers. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Council Member Johnson MOVED to adjourn the meeting at 11:33 p.m. Vice Mayor LaSala SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 — 0. 12/06/00 Minutes,Council Regular Session 12 Respectfully submitted, Roxana Garrity,Deputy De ut Town Clerk Y I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the regular session of the Town of Oro Valley Council of Oro Valley, Arizona held on the 6th day of December , 2000. I further certify that the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present. Dated this /8 H day of 3 ,209 f /41, Kath 1 E. Cuvelier, CMC Town Clerk 410 0 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Planning and Zoning Division 11000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 Phone: 520-229-4849 FAX No.: 520-742-1022 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TRANSMITTAL TO: Ainsley Reeder/OV Parks Mark Moore/OV Water FROM: Shirley Gay/Project Coordinator: e-mail sgay(a�orovalley.net PLANNER: "t)A4\d lki,reN,A•\'t DATE: 09/16/2003 Project: OV12-00-06 RV NB 71 IT WOULD BE APPRECIATED IF YOU COULD RESPOND WITH YOUR WRITTEN COMMENTS BELOW AND RETURN A COPY OF THIS TRANSMITTAL TO Attn: Shirley Gay - Project Coordinator. Please note all responses will be made available to the applicant. RESPONSE DUE BY: 9-24.-03 COMMENTS: ! 1 Ti'ire i lz but% leir ,tea/ v iij con p /Ie1 ./ road 6,i)449 crf' 'z ivre,i � Ial /s Ant c/Pnvl rP el-motif >? plan � /1i /S/vr, -IA ere__ kb ry iS i ��/� �a6 .��s tvio s f- y be- fe e it &d' Agency 4,' A:t`-A- DateSignaturel _3 F:\INDIVID\SAG\AGENCY\Transmittal InhouseDRB.doc