HomeMy WebLinkAboutPackets - Council Packets (159)
*AMENDED (10/14/14, 3:00 PM)
AGENDA
ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL
REGULAR SESSION
October 15, 2014
ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
11000 N. LA CAÑADA DRIVE
REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 5:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
EXECUTIVE SESSION - Pursuant to A.R.S. 38-431.03(A)(3) to receive legal advice pertaining to the
Town's response to the Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) municipal continuing disclosure
initiative and pursuant to A.R.S. 38-431.03(A)(7) for the purpose of discussing the purchase or lease of
real property.
REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS
COUNCIL REPORTS
• Spotlight on Youth
DEPARTMENT REPORTS
The Mayor and Council may consider and/or take action on the items listed below:
ORDER OF BUSINESS: MAYOR WILL REVIEW THE ORDER OF THE MEETING
CALL TO AUDIENCE – At this time, any member of the public is allowed to address the Mayor and
Town Council on any issue not listed on today’s agenda. Pursuant to the Arizona Open Meeting
Law, individual Council Members may ask Town Staff to review the matter, ask that the matter be placed
on a future agenda, or respond to criticism made by speakers. However, the Mayor and Council may
not discuss or take legal action on matters raised during “Call to Audience.” In order to speak during
“Call to Audience” please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card.
PRESENTATIONS
1. Proclamation - Rosalyn Glickman Day
2. Proclamation - Arizona Cities and Towns Week
CONSENT AGENDA
(Consideration and/or possible action)
A. Minutes - October 1, 2014
B. Fiscal Year 2014/2015 Financial Update through August 2014
C. Reappointment to the Corrections Officers Retirement Plan (CORP) Local Board
D. *Request for approval of a Final Plat for Block 4 of the Maracay at Vistoso subdivision, located
northeast of the Pebble Creek Drive and La Canada Drive intersection (Removed from
agenda on 10/14/14 at 3:00 p.m.)
E. Resolution No. (R)14-55, authorizing and approving an Agreement for Service between the
Town of Oro Valley and the Pima Association of Governments for a Summer Youth
Transportation Art program
REGULAR AGENDA
1. DISCUSSION & POSSIBLE DIRECTION: ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MODIFIED
REVIEW PROCESS
2. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE OCTOBER 1, 2014, CONDITION OF
APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE NO. (O)14-13, SPECIFICALLY THE CONDITION THAT
THERE BE SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION OF PARK AMENITIES BEFORE GRADING
PERMITS SHALL BE ISSUED
3. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION TO INITIATE THE 60-DAY PUBLIC NOTICE
PROCESS FOR A FUTURE DISCUSSION REGARDING REVENUE OPTIONS
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS (The Council may bring forth general topics for future meeting agendas.
Council may not discuss, deliberate or take any action on the topics presented pursuant to ARS
38-431.02H)
CALL TO AUDIENCE – At this time, any member of the public is allowed to address the Mayor and
Town Council on any issue not listed on today’s agenda. Pursuant to the Arizona Open Meeting
Law, individual Council Members may ask Town Staff to review the matter, ask that the matter be placed
on a future agenda, or respond to criticism made by speakers. However, the Mayor and Council may
not discuss or take legal action on matters raised during “Call to Audience.” In order to speak during
“Call to Audience” please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card.
ADJOURNMENT
POSTED: 10/9/14 at 5:00 p.m. by ms
AMENDED AGENDA POSTED: 10/14/14 at 4:00 p.m. by mrs
When possible, a packet of agenda materials as listed above is available for public inspection at least 24
hours prior to the Council meeting in the office of the Town Clerk between the hours of 8:00 a.m. –
5:00p.m.
The Town of Oro Valley complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If any person with a
disability needs any type of accommodation, please notify the Town Clerk’s Office at least five days prior
to the Council meeting at 229-4700.
INSTRUCTIONS TO SPEAKERS
Members of the public have the right to speak during any posted public hearing. However, those
items not listed as a public hearing are for consideration and action by the Town Council during
the course of their business meeting. Members of the public may be allowed to speak on these
topics at the discretion of the Chair.
If you wish to address the Town Council on any item(s) on this agenda, please complete a speaker card
located on the Agenda table at the back of the room and give it to the Town Clerk. Please indicate on
the speaker card which item number and topic you wish to speak on, or if you wish to speak
during “Call to Audience”, please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue
speaker card.
Please step forward to the podium when the Mayor announces the item(s) on the agenda which you are
interested in addressing.
1. For the record, please state your name and whether or not you are a Town resident.
2. Speak only on the issue currently being discussed by Council. Please organize your speech, you will
only be allowed to address the Council once regarding the topic being discussed.
3. Please limit your comments to 3 minutes.
4. During “Call to Audience” you may address the Council on any issue you wish.
5. Any member of the public speaking must speak in a courteous and respectful manner to those present.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Town Council Regular Session Item # 1.
Meeting Date:10/15/2014
Proclamation - Rosalyn Glickman Day
Information
Subject
Proclamation - Rosalyn Glickman Day
Summary
Attachments
Proclamation
(V1fice o/tk~t
®rll ~all~\!, j\rhllUa
Jrndamafinn
ROSALYN GLICKMAN DAY
OCTOBER 18 , 2014
WHEREAS, Charles and Rosalyn Glickman have resided at their home on Monaco
Place since well before the Town of Oro Valley was incorporated ; and
\
WHEREAS, Rosalyn Glickman , in 1970 , became a board member of the Shadow
Mountain Estates East Homeowners Association , a group that was active in the effort
to incorporate the Town; and
WHEREAS, Rosalyn Glickman gave her support to the new Town by signing the
incorporation petition, the petition of candidates for the first Town Council and a
petition supporting the continued incorporation of the Town; and
WHEREAS, Rosalyn Glickman was appointed to the Town's first Planning and Zoning
Commission in 1974 ; and
WHEREAS, Rosalyn Glickman was made chairperson of the Planning and Zoning
Commission in 1975 and helped draft the first Town Plan ; and
WHEREAS, both Rosalyn and Charles Glickman were recognized for their work on
behalf of the Town at the Town's 10 th anniversary celebration.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Dr. Satish L Hiremath, Mayor of the Town of Oro Valley,
Arizona , do hereby proclaim Saturday, October 18 th , 2014 as Rosalyn Glickman Day
in the Town of Oro Valley.
Dated this 15 th day of October , 2014
ATTEST :
Dr . Satish L Hiremath , Mayor Julie K. Bower , Town Clerk
Town Council Regular Session Item # 2.
Meeting Date:10/15/2014
Proclamation - Arizona Cities & Towns Week
Information
Subject
Proclamation - Arizona Cities and Towns Week
Summary
Attachments
Proclamation - Arizona Cities and Towns Week
rYl/ice o/tIw~
<IDrll ~ctllt1J, ~i7!llnct
Jrndamafinn
ARIZONA CITIES AND TOWNS WEEK
OCTOBER 19 -25,2014
WHEREAS , the citizens of the T own of Oro Va lle y rely on the Town to experience a hig h quality of life in our
community ; and
WHEREAS , c it ies and towns in Arizona work 24 hours a day , se v en days a week to deli v er vita l city services
such as fire , pol ice and emergency medical response to ensure safe communities ; and
WHEREAS , cities and towns in Arizona also pro vide services and programs that enhance the quality of life for
res idents such as parks , utilities , street maintenance , sanitation and recycling services , libraries , community
centers ,and recreational programs ; and
WHEREAS , it is important for the T own of Oro Va lle y to continue to provide the excellent deli very of services
and programs that our citizens have come to e x pect in our community ; and
WHEREAS , it is one of the resp onsibi lities of the Town of Oro Valley Offici als t o ensure open and accessible
government th rough frequent communication wi th citizens using v arious avenues and means ; and
WHEREAS , through participation and cooperation ; citi zens , community leaders , loca l businesses and municipal
staff can work together to ensure that services provided by the Town of Oro Valley can remain exceptional
elements of the quality of life of our community .
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Dr. Satish I. Hiremath , Mayor of the Town of Oro Valley , hereby proclaim the week of
October 19th through 25 th as Arizona Cities and Towns Week.
Dated this 15th day of October, 2014
A TTEST
Dr. Satish I. Hiremath , Mayor Julie K . Bower , Town Clerk
Town Council Regular Session Item # A.
Meeting Date:10/15/2014
Requested by: Julie Bower Submitted By:Mike Standish, Town Clerk's Office
Department:Town Clerk's Office
Information
SUBJECT:
Minutes - October 1, 2014
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
N/A
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to (approve, approve with the following changes) the October 1, 2014 minutes.
Attachments
10/1/14 Draft Minutes
10/1/14 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 1
MINUTES
ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL
REGULAR SESSION
October 1, 2014
ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE
REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Hiremath called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:Satish Hiremath, Mayor
Lou Waters, Vice Mayor
Brendan Burns, Councilmember
Bill Garner, Councilmember
Joe Hornat, Councilmember
Mary Snider, Councilmember
Mike Zinkin, Councilmember
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Hiremath led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance.
UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS
Communications Administrator Misti Nowak announced the upcoming town meetings
and events.
COUNCIL REPORTS
Vice Mayor Waters thanked the Golder Ranch Fire District, Oro Valley Police
Department and Town Staff for coordinating efforts in preparation for a major storm that
was predicted to hit the Town of Oro Valley on September 17th.
DEPARTMENT REPORTS
Town Clerk Julie Bower announced that new artwork was on display in the Council
Chambers by artist Pam Davidson.
10/1/14 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 2
ORDER OF BUSINESS
Mayor Hiremath said the agenda would stand as posted.
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
1.2014 AZ League Annual Conference Trip Report
2.Letter of Appreciation - Oro Valley Police Department
3.Letter of Appreciation - Water Utility Department
CALL TO AUDIENCE
Oro Valley resident Don Bristow spoke on the importance of communication between
Town residents, Town Council and staff and recommended that direct communication
with staff regarding an issue would be more effective than funneling all inquiries through
the Constituent Services Coordinator.
Oro Valley resident Bill Adler spoke on the development review process and
recommended that the number of zoning districts and permitted uses be reduced.
PRESENTATIONS
1.Introduction of Youth Advisory Council Members
Mayor Hiremath said this item would be rescheduled for a meeting in the near future.
2.Proclamation - Fire Prevention Week
Mayor Hiremath proclaimed the week of October 5 - 11, 2014 as Fire Prevention Week.
CONSENT AGENDA
Vice Mayor Waters requested that item (G) be removed from the Consent Agenda for
discussion.
Councilmember Hornat requested that item (B) be removed from the Consent Agenda
for discussion.
Councilmember Zinkin requested that items (C) and (E) be removed from the Consent
Agenda for discussion.
A.Minutes - September 3, 2014
D.Appointment to the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC)
10/1/14 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 3
F.Resolution No. (R)14-50, authorizing and approving compensation for a water
easement from Pima County
H.Resolution No. (R)14-52, authorizing and approving a task force agreement
between the Drug Enforcement Administration ("DEA") and the Town of Oro
Valley ("Town") for the participation of two (2) Oro Valley police officers in the DEA
Tucson Task Force
I.Authorization to proceed with a $125,000 appropriation for a protective cover over
the pump house at Steam Pump Ranch as requested in FY 2014/15 Budget
MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Snider and seconded by
Councilmember Burns to approve Consent Agenda items (A), (D), (F) and (H)-(I).
MOTION carried, 7-0.
B.Fiscal Year 2014/2015 Financial Update through July 2014
Councilmember Hornat and Councilmember Zinkin requested that construction and
utility taxes be broken out separately on future reports.
Councilmember Hornat asked how the Highway Fund Reserves were utilized.
Finance Director Stacey Lemos said the Highway Fund Reserves were used for the
fund’s operations.
MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Hornat and seconded by
Councilmember Snider to accept item (B).
MOTION carried, 7-0.
C.Appointment to the Public Safety Personnel Retirement System (PSPRS)
Local Board
Councilmember Zinkin asked if there had been notice to residents regarding the PSPRS
appointment.
Mayor Hiremath said the appointment was under his purview and it was not noticed.
MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Zinkin and seconded by
Councilmember Snider to approve item (C).
MOTION carried, 7-0.
E.Request for approval of a Final Plat for Block 1 of the Maracay at Vistoso
10/1/14 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 4
subdivision, located southwest of the Pebble Creek Drive and La Canada
Drive intersection
Councilmember Zinkin asked if there was a golf course buffer for lots 6-24.
Development and Infrastructure Services Director Paul Keesler said that there was a
buffer but the buffer was usually depicted on the preliminary plat rather than the final
plat.
Paul Oland, representative for the WLB Group, said the setbacks did not overlap onto
the lots.
MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Zinkin and seconded by
Councilmember Burns to approve item (E).
MOTION carried, 7-0.
G.Resolution No.(R)14-51, authorizing and approving the State Historic
Preservation Office Pass-Through Grant Agreement for the Building
Condition Assessment Update for structures at Steam Pump Ranch
Vice Mayor Waters inquired as to what happened as a result of the first building
assessment that was conducted approximately ten years ago and how the new building
assessment would get the town closer to developing a Master Plan for Steam Pump
Ranch.
Parks and Recreation Director Kristy Diaz-Trahan said the first assessment was
included in the original Steam Pump Ranch Master Plan, but, for the most part, no
action was taken to preserve or restore the buildings. The new building assessment
would document the structures in their current condition which would assist staff with
determining how funds would be used in the future.
Town Manager Greg Caton said the assessment would help with data collection which
would be used for future decisions.
MOTION:A motion was made by Vice Mayor Waters and seconded by Councilmember
Snider to approve Resolution No. (R)14-51, authorizing and approving the State Historic
Preservation Office Pass-Through Grant agreement for the Building Condition
Assessment Update for structures at Steam Pump Ranch.
MOTION carried, 7-0.
REGULAR AGENDA
10/1/14 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 5
1.PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING AN
APPLICATION FOR A SERIES 12 (RESTAURANT) LIQUOR LICENSE FOR
ZPIZZA LOCATED AT 11165 N. LA CANADA DRIVE, SUITE 131
Town Clerk Julie Bower gave an overview of item #1.
Mayor Hiremath opened the public hearing.
No comments were received.
Mayor Hiremath closed the public hearing.
MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Snider and seconded by
Councilmember Zinkin to recommend approval of the issuance of a Series 12 liquor
license to the Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control for Thomas Aguilera
and principals for ZPizza located at 11165 N. La Canada Dr., Suite 131.
MOTION carried, 7-0.
2.PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING AN
APPLICATION FOR A SERIES 12 (RESTAURANT) LIQUOR LICENSE FOR
RED LOBSTER #6350 LOCATED AT 11695 N. ORACLE ROAD
Ms. Bower gave an overview of item #2.
Mayor Hiremath opened the public hearing.
No comments were received.
Mayor Hiremath closed the public hearing.
MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Snider and seconded by
Councilmember Garner to recommend approval of the issuance of a Series 12 liquor
license to the Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control for Richard S. Teel
and principals for Red Lobster #6350 located at 11695 N. Oracle Road.
MOTION carried, 7-0.
3.PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING AN
APPLICATION FOR A SERIES 12 (RESTAURANT) LIQUOR LICENSE FOR
DICKEY’S BARBECUE PIT LOCATED AT 7850 N. ORACLE ROAD
Ms. Bower gave an overview of item #3.
Mayor Hiremath opened the public hearing.
10/1/14 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 6
No comments were received.
Mayor Hiremath closed the public hearing.
MOTION:A motion was made by Vice Mayor Waters and seconded by Councilmember
Zinkin to recommend approval of the issuance of a Series 12 liquor license to the
Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control for David Wirth II and principals for
Dickey's Barbecue Pit located at 7850 N. Oracle Road.
MOTION carried, 7-0.
4.PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE NO. (O)14-10, AMENDING ORO VALLEY
TOWN CODE, CHAPTER 2, MAYOR AND COUNCIL, ARTICLE 2-3 COUNCIL
ELECTION, SECTION 2-3-1 PRIMARY ELECTION AND 2-3-3 GENERAL
ELECTION NOMINATION
Ms. Bower gave an overview of item #4.
Mayor Hiremath opened the public hearing.
No comments were received.
Mayor Hiremath closed the public hearing.
Discussion ensued amongst Council and staff regarding the proposed amendments.
MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Snider and seconded by Vice Mayor
Waters to approve Ordinance No. (O)14-10, amending Sections 2-3-1 Primary Election
and 2-3-3 General Election Nomination of the Oro Valley Town Code.
MOTION carried, 7-0.
5.CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN, LANDSCAPE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURE FOR
STONE CANYON CLUBHOUSE, LOCATED AT 14320 N HOHOKAM VILLAGE
PLACE, IN NEIGHBORHOOD 11 OF THE RANCHO VISTOSO PLANNED
AREA DEVELOPMENT
Senior Planner Matt Michels gave an overview of item #5.
Roger Nelson, representing the Applicant, introduced himself and said that he was
available for any questions.
MOTION:A motion was made by Vice Mayor Waters and seconded by Councilmember
Zinkin to approve the Conceptual Site Plan, Landscaping Plan and Conceptual
Architecture for the Stone Canyon Clubhouse located at 14320 N. Hohokam Village
10/1/14 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 7
Place, in neighborhood 11 of the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development and
subject to the Conditions in Attachment 1.
ATTACHMENT 1
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Part I: Conceptual Site Plan/Conceptual Landscape Plan
Planning
1. Provide brick pavers or other decorative paving on the entry drive (Shown as Keynote
#6)
Engineering
1. Provide a detention basin or other approved storm water management devise as
necessary to attenuate the additional runoff generated as a result of the new parking
and access drive areas.
2. Provide a turn-around area at the southern end of the new proposed parking lot. This
can be provided in the form of a striped out parking space.
Part II: Conceptual Architecture
Planning
1. The lamp depicted above the main entry shall not exceed a maximum height of 9 feet
to the center of the luminaire.
2. Submit a roof plan with the Final Architecture demonstrating that all mechanical
equipment will be screened from view.
MOTION carried, 7-0.
6.AMENDMENT TO THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE SECTION 27.9.E.4 AND
CHAPTER 27
a.RESOLUTION NO. (R)14-53, DECLARING THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO
THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE SECTION 27.9.E.4 AND CHAPTER 27,
RELATING TO GRADING REGULATIONS, PROVIDED AS EXHIBIT “A”
WITHIN THE ATTACHED RESOLUTION AND FILED WITH THE TOWN CLERK,
A PUBLIC RECORD
MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Zinkin and seconded by
Councilmember Hornat to approve Resolution No. (R)14-53, declaring the proposed
amendment to the Oro Valley Zoning Code Section 27.9.E.4 and Chapter 27, relating to
Grading Regulations, provided as Exhibit "A" within the attached resolution and filed
with the Town Clerk, a public record.
MOTION carried, 7-0.
10/1/14 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 8
b.PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE NO. (O)14-11, AMENDING SECTION 27.9.E.4
OF THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED TO GRADE UP TO OR
BEYOND THEIR PROPERTY LINE WITH THE ADJACENT OWNER’S
CONSENT
Permitting Manager David Laws gave an overview of item #6b.
Discussion ensued amongst Council and staff regarding the proposed Zoning Code
Amendment.
Mayor Hiremath opened the public hearing.
No comments were received.
Mayor Hiremath closed the public hearing.
MOTION:A motion was made by Vice Mayor Waters and seconded by Councilmember
Hornat to approve Ordinance No. (O)14-11, an amendment to Section 27.9.E.4 relating
to grading provisions based on the finding that the request will provide a path for
consenting property owners to work together on projects that are adjacent to one
another subject to the revisions in Attachment #3.
Councilmember Hornat requested an amendment to the motion to modify Section 4a
and 4b of the text amendment by changing the word "OR" to "AND". Vice Mayor
Waters agreed to the amendment.
ATTACHMENT 3
Additions shown in ALL CAPS
4. Slope Setbacks
The Town may increase the following slope setbacks, if considered necessary for
safety or stability, or to prevent possible damage from water, soil, or debris:
a)Top of cut slope: The top of cut slopes shall be made not nearer to a site
boundary line than one-fifth (1/5) of the vertical height of cut, with a
minimum of two (2’) feet, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE
TOWN ENGINEER OR THE PLANNING AND ZONING
ADMINISTRATOR AND UPON WRITTEN CONSENT FROM THE
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER. The setback may need to be
increased for any required interceptor drains.
b)Toe of fill slope: The toe of fill slope shall be made not nearer to the site
boundary line than one-half (1/2) the height of the slope, with a minimum
10/1/14 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 9
of two (2’) feet, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE TOWN
ENGINEER OR THE PLANNING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR AND
UPON WRITTEN CONSENT FROM THE ADJACENT PROPERTY
OWNER.
c)Building: Buildings shall be set back from the toe and top of slopes in
accordance with the building codes (minimum five (5) feet, see Figure
27.9 – 1) and the approved soils report. In addition, the building setbacks
of the applicable zoning district shall apply.
d)Rights-of-way: The required setback of a slope toe adjacent to a public
right-of-way may be reduced with the approval of the Town, if there will be
no adverse effect and:
I.Easements are not required, or
II.Retaining walls are used.
MOTION AS AMENDED carried, 6-1 with Councilmember Garner opposed.
7.AMENDMENT TO THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE SECTION 27.10.F.2.c.iii
AND CHAPTER 27
a.RESOLUTION NO. (R)14-54, DECLARING THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO
THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE SECTION 27.10.F.2.c.iii AND CHAPTER
27, RELATING TO ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE LANDS FLEXIBLE
DESIGN OPTIONS, PROVIDED AS EXHIBIT “A” WITHIN THE ATTACHED
RESOLUTION AND FILED WITH THE TOWN CLERK, A PUBLIC RECORD
MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Snider and seconded by Vice Mayor
Waters to approve Resolution No. (R)14-54, declaring the proposed amendments to the
Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised Section 27.10.F.2.c.iii and Chapter 27, attached
hereto as Exhibit "A" and filed with the Town Clerk, a public record.
MOTION carried, 7-0.
b.PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE NO. (O)14-12, AMENDING SECTION
27.10.F.2.c.iii, ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE LANDS, OF THE ORO
VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED TO ALLOW LOT WIDTHS TO BE
MODIFIED AS A FLEXIBLE DESIGN OPTION
Planner Rosevelt Arellano gave an overview of item #7b.
Stacy Weeks, representative for Norris Design, gave an overview of the proposed
amendment.
Discussion ensued amongst Council and the applicant regarding the proposed
amendment to allow lot widths to be modified as a flexible design option.
10/1/14 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 10
Mayor Hiremath opened the public hearing.
The following individual spoke in opposition to item #7b.
Oro Valley resident Bill Adler
Mayor Hiremath closed the public hearing.
MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Hornat and seconded by
Councilmember Zinkin to deny Ordinance No. (O)14-12, amending Section
27.10.F.2.c.iii, relating to flexible design options, finding that there are other alternatives.
MOTION carried, 6-1 with Mayor Hiremath opposed.
Mayor Hiremath recessed the meeting at 7:36 p.m.
Mayor Hiremath reconvened the meeting at 7:42 p.m.
8.PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE NO. (O)14-13, APPLICANT REQUESTS
APPROVAL TO: 1. INCORPORATE A 39-ACRE PROPERTY LOCATED ON
THE NORTH SIDE OF MOORE ROAD, BETWEEN YELLOW ORCHID DRIVE
AND MYSTIC VIEW PLACE, INTO THE RANCHO VISTOSO PLANNED AREA
DEVELOPMENT (PAD) AND ESTABLISH NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT
POLICIES FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY; 2. REZONE THE PROPERTY TO
RANCHO VISTOSO PAD MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL; AND 3. UTILIZE
THE ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE LANDS (ESL) MODIFIED REVIEW
PROCESS
Mr. Michels gave an overview of item #8.
Keri Sylvan, representative for the Olson Family, gave an overview of the proposed
rezoning request.
Mayor Hiremath opened the public hearing.
The following individuals spoke in opposition to item #7b.
Oro Valley resident Rick Hines
Oro Valley resident Bill Adler
Oro Valley resident Carole Hoss
The following individual spoke in support of item #7b.
Managing Agent for the Vistoso HOA, Kolleen Weber
10/1/14 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 11
Mayor Hiremath closed the public hearing.
Discussion ensued amongst Council, staff and the applicant regarding the proposed
rezoning request.
MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Zinkin and seconded by
Councilmember Garner to continue item #8 for 15 days to allow the applicant to mitigate
neighbor concerns.
MOTION failed, 3-4 with Mayor Hiremath, Vice Mayor Waters, Councilmember Hornat,
and Councilmember Snider opposed.
MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Hornat and seconded by
Councilmember Burns to approve Ordinance No. (O)14-13, approving the inclusion of
the Olsen Property in Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 10, as shown in Exhibit “B” of
Attachment 1 and to Rezone the property to Rancho Vistoso Planned Area
Development (PAD) Medium Density Residential, subject to the conditions in Exhibit “C”
of Attachment 1, including use of the modified review process in Section 27.10.F2.c.i.a.
and subject to the following additional condition: The amount of funding provided for use
of Hohokam Park as a recreation area must be equivalent to or greater than the full
development cost of a park meeting non-PAD zoning code requirements for this
development, as determined by the Planning and Zoning Administrator, currently
estimated at $80,000. This funding must be entirely used to increase the number or type
of recreational amenities within the park facility. Examples of such improvements
include additional play or sports equipment or expansion of the park facility. The monies
shall not be used for the repair, dog park replacement or remodeling of existing facilities
or for ongoing park operations or maintenance. A final copy of the agreement between
the developer and Rancho Vistoso HOA shall be provided in order to certify compliance
with this rezoning condition. No grading permit to be issued until substantial completion
of park amenities. Furthermore, the applicant agrees to reduce the number of lots from
105 to 75 and that no more than two two-story homes shall be built next to each other.
ATTACHMENT 1
EXHIBIT "C"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning
1.Lots abutting the western boundary of the developed area and within 948 feet
of the north right of way line of Moore Road shall be restricted to one story in
height, not to exceed 24 feet.
10/1/14 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 12
2.The developer shall designate the Highland Wash Trail #326 as a “permanent
non-motorized public recreation easement” in a location approved by the
Planning and Zoning Administrator and Town Engineer.
3.The developer shall construct a shared use path to provide access to the
Hohokam Park to the north in a location approved by the Planning and Zoning
Administrator and Town Engineer. This path shall be owned and maintained
by the homeowners association.
4.A Cultural Resource Survey and Inventory Report prepared in accordance
with Section 27.10.D.3.e. shall be completed prior to the approval of the Final
Site Plan.
5.Lots highlighted on Attachment 7 of the Planning and Zoning Commission
Staff Report dated July 1, 2014 shall be reconfigured to eliminate multiple
rear yards abutting a side yard.
Engineering
1.The developer shall dedicate additional right-of-way along Moore Road to the
Town of Oro Valley for an ultimate right-of-way of 150’ as depicted by the
Tentative Development Plan in Attachment 2.
2.Moore Road shall be widened from a two-lane section along the project
frontage to a four-lane section including curbs, raised medians, a multi-use
lane, and sidewalk to match the existing roadway section on both sides of the
project.
MOTION AS AMENDED carried, 7-0.
9.NARANJA PARK PROGRAMMING & DESIGN MASTER PLAN UPDATE
PRESENTATION AND APPROVAL OF PROGRAMMING ELEMENTS
Ms. Kristy Diaz-Trahan introduced item #9.
Don McGann, representative for McGann and Associates, presented the Naranja Park
Master Plan Update.
Andy Wellik, Research Manager for FMR Associates Inc., provided an overview of the
telephone survey.
Discussion ensued amongst Council, staff and Mr. McGann regarding the Naranja Park
Master Plan Update.
10/1/14 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 13
The following individual spoke on item #9.
Oro Valley resident Bill Adler
MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Snider and seconded by Mayor
Hiremath to recommend approval of the Naranja Park programming elements as
presented.
Councilmember Hornat requested an amendment to the motion to bring a
comprehensive park plan to Council at the same time as the Naranja Park
plan. Councilmember Hornat and Mayor Hiremath agreed to the amendment.
MOTION AS AMENDED carried, 6-1 with Councilmember Burns opposed.
10.DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION TO APPROVE A YOUTH
SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM IN CONJUNCTION WITH ORO VALLEY PARKS
AND RECREATION PROGRAMS
Ms. Diaz-Trahan gave an overview of item #10.
Water Utility Administrator Shirley Seng discussed how donations could be made to the
scholarship program.
Discussion ensued amongst Council and staff regarding the proposed Youth
Scholarship Program.
MOTION:A motion was made by Vice Mayor Waters and seconded by Councilmember
Zinkin to approve the Youth Scholarship Program as presented.
MOTION carried, 7-0.
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Councilmember Zinkin requested a future agenda item to discuss permitted uses,
seconded by Councilmember Garner.
Councilmember Garner requested a future agenda item for the first quarter of 2015, to
discuss the creation of a Benefits or Actuary Committee for the Town's self-funded
insurance program, seconded by Councilmember Zinkin.
CALL TO AUDIENCE
No comments were received.
10/1/14 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 14
ADJOURNMENT
MOTION:A motion was made by Vice Mayor Waters and seconded by Councilmember
Burns to adjourn the meeting at 10:12 p.m.
MOTION carried, 7-0.
Prepared by:
_________________________
Michael Standish, CMC
Deputy Town Clerk
I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of
the regular session of the Town of Oro Valley Council of Oro Valley, Arizona held on the
1st day of October, 2014. I further certify that the meeting was duly called and held and
that a quorum was present.
Dated this ____ day of ______________________, 2014.
_______________________________
Julie K. Bower, MMC
Town Clerk
Town Council Regular Session Item # B.
Meeting Date:10/15/2014
Requested by: Stacey Lemos Submitted By:Wendy Gomez, Finance
Department:Finance
Information
SUBJECT:
Fiscal Year 2014/2015 Financial Update through August 2014
RECOMMENDATION:
This item is for information only.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
In the General Fund (see attachment A), revenues collected through August totaled $4.9 million, or 15.1%
of the budget amount of $32.3 million. Year-to-date expenditures through August totaled $4.2 million, or
13.0% of the budget amount of $32.5 million. Please note that the expenditure budget includes the
authorized use of contingency reserves in the amount of $190,000 to fund the purchase of a modular
building to address Town space needs, including the on-site wellness clinic, which was approved by
Council on July 2, 2014. This amount is included in the budgeted transfer out to the General
Government CIP Fund.
In the Highway Fund (see attachment B), revenues collected through August totaled $500,660, or 16.9%
of the budget amount of $3.0 million. Year-to-date expenditures through August totaled $473,705, or
10.9% of the budget amount of $4.4 million. It is important to note that the Highway Fund budget includes
the planned use of $1.4 million in reserves, as all construction sales tax revenues are now fully
accounted for in the General Fund.
In the Bed Tax Fund (see attachment C), revenues collected through August totaled $137,125, or 14.5%
of the budget amount of $949,000. Year-to-date expenditures through August totaled $209,642, or
21.8% of the budget amount of $961,000.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
GENERAL FUND
Attachment A shows General Fund revenues and expenditures through August, as well as year-end
estimates for each category. The estimated year-end projections in the General Fund are as follows:
Revenues $32,400,003
Less:
Expenditures ($32,311,027)
Est. Increase in Fund Balance $ 88,976
General Fund Revenues
Local sales tax collections in the General Fund total $2.3 million or 14.9% of the budget amount of
$15.7 million. Sales tax collections in the General Fund are estimated to come in on budget at this
time. Please note the inclusion of a new, additional attachment (Attachment E), which will
track General Fund local sales tax collections on a monthly basis, including construction
and utility sales tax.
Federal Grant revenues are estimated to come in over budget by about $44,000 or 7.4%, due to
grant funds received for a Police DUI Tahoe funded by the Governor's Office of Highway Safety.
Charges for Services revenues are estimated to come in over budget by nearly $80,000 or 4.7%,
due primarily to revenue trends at the Aquatic Center and zoning & subdivision fees.
Interest Income collections through August reflect an unrealized interest loss in July, which is
expected to be recovered throughout the remainder of the fiscal year.
Staff will continue to monitor revenue collections and may adjust the year-end estimates based on actual
trends.
General Fund Expenditures
Expenditures are estimated to come in under budget by nearly $146,000 or 0.4%, due to projected
vacancy savings. Note that these savings are estimates and are subject to change.
HIGHWAY FUND
Highway Fund Revenues
State shared highway user funds total $470,906, or 17.1% of the budget amount of $2.8 million and
are estimated to come in on budget at this time.
Highway Fund Expenditures
Expenditures are estimated to come in on budget at this time.
BED TAX FUND
Bed Tax Revenues
Bed tax revenues total $137,072, or 14.5% of the budget amount of $945,000 and are estimated to
come in on budget at this time.
Bed Tax Fund Expenditures
Expenditures are estimated to come in on budget at this time.
Please see Attachments A, B, and C for additional details on the General Fund, Highway Fund and Bed
Tax Fund respectively. See Attachment D for a fiscal year-to-date consolidated summary of all Town
funds. In addition, as noted earlier, a new Attachment E is included with a breakdown of monthly local
sales tax collections for the General Fund.
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
N/A
SUGGESTED MOTION:
This item is for information only.
Attachments
Attachment A - General Fund
Attachment B - HW Fund
Attachment C - Bed Tax Fund
Attachment D - Summary All Funds
Attachment E - GF Local Sales Tax
ATTACHMENT A
August YTD Financial Status
General Fund
% Budget Completion through August --- 16.7%
% Actuals YE % Variance
to Budget to Budget
REVENUES:
LOCAL SALES TAX 2,328,145 15,676,905 14.9% 15,676,905 0.0%
LICENSES & PERMITS 241,810 1,805,547 13.4% 1,805,547 0.0%
FEDERAL GRANTS 164,940 597,365 27.6% 641,676 7.4%
STATE GRANTS 103,785 1,607,300 6.5% 1,607,300 0.0%
STATE/COUNTY SHARED 1,644,821 10,303,762 16.0% 10,303,762 0.0%
OTHER INTERGOVERNMENTAL - 15,000 0.0% 15,000 0.0%
CHARGES FOR SERVICES 342,102 1,688,995 20.3% 1,768,688 4.7%
FINES 22,112 180,000 12.3% 180,000 0.0%
INTEREST INCOME 178 81,125 0.2% 81,125 0.0%
MISCELLANEOUS 20,510 135,000 15.2% 135,000 0.0%
TRANSFERS IN - 185,000 0.0%185,000 0.0%
TOTAL REVENUES 4,868,403 32,275,999 15.1% 32,400,003 0.4%
% Actuals YE % Variance
to Budget to Budget
EXPENDITURES:
COUNCIL 46,583 207,022 22.5% 207,022 0.0%
CLERK 54,813 497,102 11.0% 497,102 0.0%
MANAGER 96,722 721,724 13.4% 721,724 0.0%
HUMAN RESOURCES 52,365 371,998 14.1% 371,998 0.0%
FINANCE 97,431 748,060 13.0% 747,617 -0.1%
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 207,426 1,432,374 14.5% 1,432,374 0.0%
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION 247,190 1,867,600 13.2% 1,867,600 0.0%
LEGAL 93,561 756,855 12.4% 756,855 0.0%
COURT 109,259 789,826 13.8% 789,826 0.0%
DEV & INFRASTRUCTURE SVCS 573,252 4,564,803 12.6% 4,419,508 -3.2%
PARKS & RECREATION 408,047 2,722,617 15.0% 2,722,617 0.0%
POLICE 2,065,362 14,885,819 13.9% 14,885,819 0.0%
TRANSFERS OUT 158,965 2,890,965 5.5%2,890,965 0.0%
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 4,210,975 32,456,765 13.0% 32,311,027 -0.4%
SURPLUS / (DEFICIT) 657,428 (180,766) 88,976
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE **11,534,023
Plus: Surplus / (Deficit)88,976
ENDING FUND BALANCE **11,622,998
* Year-end estimates are subject to further revision
** Beginning and ending fund balance amounts are estimates and are subject to further revision
FY 2014/2015
Year End
Estimate *
Budget Year End
Estimate *
Actuals
thru 8/2014
Actuals
thru 8/2014
Budget
F:\BUDGET ANALYST\Financial Reports 2014-2015\1Q\Aug\Aug FY15 Monthly Report 10/06/2014
ATTACHMENT B
August YTD Financial Status FY 2014/2015
% Budget Completion through August --- 16.7%
Actuals
thru 8/2014 Budget % Actuals
to Budget
Year End
Estimate *
YE % Variance
to Budget
REVENUES:
LICENSES & PERMITS 7,045 52,000 13.5% 52,000 0.0%
STATE/COUNTY SHARED 470,906 2,754,947 17.1% 2,754,947 0.0%
CHARGES FOR SERVICES 21,582 129,493 16.7% 129,493 0.0%
INTEREST INCOME 379 19,250 2.0% 19,250 0.0%
MISCELLANEOUS 749 10,000 7.5%10,000 0.0%
TOTAL REVENUES 500,660 2,965,690 16.9% 2,965,690 0.0%
Actuals
thru 8/2014 Budget % Actuals
to Budget
Year End
Estimate *
YE % Variance
to Budget
EXPENDITURES:
ADMINISTRATION 75,900 610,478 12.4% 610,478 0.0%
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING 75,782 537,275 14.1% 537,275 0.0%
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT 16,104 1,219,002 1.3% 1,219,002 0.0%
STREET MAINTENANCE 241,485 1,053,631 22.9% 1,053,631 0.0%
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 64,433 934,276 6.9%934,276 0.0%
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 473,705 4,354,662 10.9% 4,354,662 0.0%
SURPLUS / (DEFICIT) 26,955 (1,388,972) (1,388,972)
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE **4,175,161
Plus: Surplus / (Deficit) (1,388,972)
ENDING FUND BALANCE **2,786,189
* Year-end estimates are subject to further revision
** Beginning and ending fund balance amounts are estimates and are subject to further revision
Highway Fund
F:\BUDGET ANALYST\Financial Reports 2014-2015\1Q\Aug\Aug FY15 Monthly Report 10/06/2014
ATTACHMENT C
August YTD Financial Status
% Budget Completion through August --- 16.7%
% Actuals YE % Variance
to Budget to Budget
REVENUES:
BED TAXES 137,072 944,571 14.5% 944,571 0.0%
INTEREST INCOME 53 4,125 1.3%4,125 0.0%
TOTAL REVENUES 137,125 948,696 14.5% 948,696 0.0%
% Actuals YE % Variance
to Budget to Budget
EXPENDITURES:
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 42,099 608,457 6.9% 608,457 0.0%
TRANSFERS OUT 167,543 352,543 47.5%352,543 0.0%
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 209,642 961,000 21.8% 961,000 0.0%
SURPLUS / (DEFICIT) (72,517) (12,304) (12,304)
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE **425,099
Plus: Surplus / (Deficit) (12,304)
ENDING FUND BALANCE **412,795
* Year-end estimates are subject to further revision
** Beginning and ending fund balance amounts are estimates and are subject to further revision
FY 2014/2015
Year End
Estimate *
Budget Year End
Estimate *
Bed Tax Fund
Budget Actuals
thru 8/2014
Actuals
thru 8/2014
F:\BUDGET ANALYST\Financial Reports 2014-2015\1Q\Aug\Aug FY15 Monthly Report 10/06/2014
ATTACHMENT D
Co
n
s
o
l
i
d
a
t
e
d
Y
e
a
r
-
t
o
-
D
a
t
e
F
i
n
a
nc
i
a
l
R
e
p
o
r
t
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
A
u
g
u
s
t
,
2
0
1
4
FY 2014/2015
FY
1
4
/
1
5
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
L
e
a
s
e
s
/
Left in Accounts
Be
g
i
n
B
a
l
.
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
O
u
t
Thru Aug 2014
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
-
U
n
a
s
s
i
g
n
e
d
9
,
9
2
5
,
9
8
8
4
,
8
6
8
,
4
0
3
-
4
,
8
6
8
,
4
0
3
1
5
9
,
7
3
3
3
,
1
2
7
,
6
0
7
9
1
1
,
7
4
9
1
1
,
8
8
7
- - 4,210,975 10,583,416
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
-
A
s
s
i
g
n
e
d
1
,
6
0
8
,
0
3
5
1,608,035
Hi
g
h
w
a
y
F
u
n
d
-
R
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
e
d
4
,
1
7
5
,
1
6
1
5
0
0
,
6
6
0
-
5
0
0
,
6
6
0
-
2
6
4
,
8
4
1
6
3
,
3
5
3
1
4
5
,
5
1
1
- - 473,705 4,202,116
Se
i
z
u
r
e
&
F
o
r
f
e
i
t
u
r
e
-
S
t
a
t
e
5
2
6
,
9
0
1
2
,
3
6
2
-
2
,
3
6
2
-
-
2
4
,
6
6
6
1
4
,
1
0
0
- - 38,766 490,497
Se
i
z
u
r
e
&
F
o
r
f
e
i
t
u
r
e
-
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
3
4
9
,
7
2
4
-
-
-
1
2
,
9
9
4
-
-
- - 12,994 336,730
Be
d
T
a
x
F
u
n
d
-
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
d
4
2
5
,
0
9
9
1
3
7
,
1
2
5
-
1
3
7
,
1
2
5
1
6
7
,
5
4
3
3
5
,
6
9
8
6
,
4
0
0
-
- - 209,642 352,582
Im
p
o
u
n
d
F
e
e
F
u
n
d
7
,
3
4
6
6
,
1
5
0
-
6
,
1
5
0
-
4
,
0
6
0
-
-
- - 4,060 9,436
Mu
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
D
e
b
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
F
u
n
d
5
3
3
,
9
2
8
3
1
,
8
0
4
3
2
9
,
6
2
7
3
6
1
,
4
3
1
-
-
1
,
8
0
0
-
- 667,200 669,000 226,359
Or
a
c
l
e
R
o
a
d
D
e
b
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
F
u
n
d
2
8
1
-
-
-
-
-
2
5
0
-
- 250 31
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
W
a
t
e
r
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
D
e
v
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
F
u
n
d
3
,
3
3
6
,
0
9
9
1
9
1
,
8
2
4
-
1
9
1
,
8
2
4
-
-
6
,
6
7
2
- 6,672 3,521,251
Po
t
a
b
l
e
W
a
t
e
r
S
y
s
t
e
m
D
e
v
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
F
u
n
d
4
,
5
0
5
,
6
3
5
9
7
,
4
0
2
-
9
7
,
4
0
2
-
-
-
-
- - 4,603,037
To
w
n
w
i
d
e
R
o
a
d
w
a
y
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
F
u
n
d
2
,
7
9
1
,
1
6
6
6
8
,
5
3
8
-
6
8
,
5
3
8
-
-
-
3
4
,
1
7
1
- - 34,171 2,825,533
Pa
r
k
s
&
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
F
u
n
d
2
1
,
5
5
5
2
4
,
0
8
6
-
2
4
,
0
8
6
-
-
-
-
- - - 45,641
Li
b
r
a
r
y
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
F
u
n
d
1
1
4
,
7
9
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- - - 114,798
Po
l
i
c
e
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
F
u
n
d
2
0
5
,
9
3
6
9
,
9
1
5
-
9
,
9
1
5
-
-
-
-
- - - 215,851
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
F
u
n
d
3
,
5
0
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- - - 3,502
Na
r
a
n
j
a
P
a
r
k
F
u
n
d
7
3
7
,
0
5
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
9
4
,
6
0
4
- - 194,604 542,452
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
C
I
P
F
u
n
d
1
,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
0
,
5
3
8
- - 60,538 1,439,462
W
a
t
e
r
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
1
1
,
8
2
3
,
3
4
2
2
,
3
3
7
,
1
0
9
-
2
,
3
3
7
,
1
0
9
3
,
1
1
9
4
1
9
,
9
6
6
8
0
2
,
2
4
2
2
3
0
,
6
2
9
- 1,455,956 12,704,494
St
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
5
0
3
,
4
7
4
5
7
,
0
7
7
-
5
7
,
0
7
7
1
,
9
1
9
4
8
,
0
2
3
5
9
,
5
6
4
4
,
3
7
5
- - 113,881 446,669
Fl
e
e
t
F
u
n
d
8
4
,
9
4
9
1
3
5
,
2
0
2
-
1
3
5
,
2
0
2
-
1
1
,
4
6
5
7
5
,
9
3
6
2
6
,
7
4
9
- - 114,150 106,001
Be
n
e
f
i
t
S
e
l
f
I
n
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
F
u
n
d
5
8
4
,
5
0
9
3
2
3
,
9
1
7
-
3
2
3
,
9
1
7
-
-
3
1
3
,
0
9
9
-
- - 313,099 595,327
Re
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
I
n
-
L
i
e
u
F
e
e
F
u
n
d
6
,
1
9
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- - - 6,190
To
t
a
l
4
3
,
7
7
0
,
6
7
3
8
,
7
9
1
,
5
7
3
3
2
9
,
6
2
7
9
,
1
2
1
,
2
0
0
3
3
2
,
3
1
4
3
,
9
2
4
,
6
5
5
2
,
2
5
9
,
0
5
9
7
2
9
,
2
3
6
- 667,200 7,912,462 44,979,410
Fu
n
d
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
Ot
h
e
r
F
i
n
So
u
r
c
e
s
/
T
f
r
s
To
t
a
l
I
n
Debt Service
T
o
t
a
l
O
u
t
Pe
r
s
o
n
n
e
l
O
&
M
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
C
o
n
t
i
n
g
e
n
c
y
F:
\
B
U
D
G
E
T
A
N
A
L
Y
S
T
\
F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
R
e
p
o
r
t
s
2
0
1
4
-
2
0
1
5
\
1
Q
\
A
u
g
\
A
u
g
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
A
l
l
F
u
n
d
s
10/06/2014
ATTACHMENT E
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
L
o
c
a
l
S
a
l
e
s
T
a
x
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
FY 2014/201 5
CA
T
E
G
O
R
Y
J
U
L
Y
A UG
S
E
P
O
C
T
N
O
V
D
E
C
J
A
N
F
E
B
M
A
R
A PR
M
A
Y
J
U
N
E
T
O
T
A
L
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
S
a
l
e
s
T
a
x
35
3
,
2
5
7
3
6
5
,
8
7
7
719,134
Ut
i
l
i
t
y S
a
l
e
s
T
a
x
26
9
,
7
7
2
2
9
9
,
1
5
4
568,926
Al
l
O
t
h
e
r
L
o
c
a
l
S
a
l
e
s
T
a
x
*
62
4
,
0
2
0
4
1
5
,
6
6
5
1,039,685
TO
T
A
L
1
,
2
4
7
,
0
4
9
$
1
,
0
8
0
,
6
9
6
$
2,327,745 $
*
N
o
t
e
:
D
o
e
s
n
o
t
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
c
a
b
l
e
f
r
a
n
c
hi
s
e
f
e
e
s
o
r
s
a
l
e
s
t
a
x
a
u
d
i
t
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
F:
\
B
U
D
G
E
T
A
N
A
L
Y
S
T
\
F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
R
e
p
o
r
t
s
2
0
1
4
-
2
0
1
5
\
1
Q
\
A
u
g
\
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
E
-
L
o
c
a
l
S
a
l
e
s
T
a
x
10/06/2014
Town Council Regular Session Item # C.
Meeting Date:10/15/2014
Submitted By:Julie Bower, Town Clerk's Office
Department:Town Clerk's Office
Information
SUBJECT:
Reappointment to the Corrections Officers Retirement Plan (CORP) Local Board
RECOMMENDATION:
Mayor Hiremath and Police Chief Sharp recommend the reappointment of Dr. Roberta Hindenlang to the
Corrections Officers Retirement Plan Local Board for a term ending 8/31/2018.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Police Department dispatchers are members of the State of Arizona Corrections Officers Retirement Plan
(CORP). Pursuant to ARS 38-893, each municipality that offers CORP must also form a local board to
administer various aspects of the program to its members. The local board must be comprised of the
following:
The Mayor or his designee who serves as chairperson
Two citizens appointed by the Mayor with the approval of Council to four-year terms
Two members (employees) elected by secret ballot by members employed by the Town of Oro
Valley to four-year terms
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
Dr. Roberta Hindenlang is an Oro Valley resident and has had a family practice for 23 years. She has
been on the Board of Trustees for the Oro Valley Hospital since its inception in 2005 and has been a
medical advisor and volunteer at St. Elizabeth's Clinic of Tucson since 1994. She was first appointed to
the CORP Local Board in April 2012.
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to reappoint Dr. Roberta Hindenlang to the Corrections Officers Retirement Plan Local Board for
a term ending August 31, 2018.
Town Council Regular Session Item # D.
Meeting Date:10/15/2014
Requested by: Bayer Vella
Submitted By:Rosevelt Arellano
Development Infrastructure Services
Department:Development Infrastructure Services
Information
SUBJECT:
*Request for approval of a Final Plat for Block 4 of the Maracay at Vistoso subdivision, located northeast
of the Pebble Creek Drive and La Canada Drive intersection (Removed from agenda on 10/14/14 at 3:00
p.m.)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The applicant requests approval of a Final Plat for one of six communities in the Maracay at Vistoso
subdivision (Attachment 1). The plat features 74 lots, private streets, and common areas. The Final Plat
has been reviewed against the approved Conceptual Site Plan and meets Town requirements.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
The Final Plat requires Town Council approval prior to being officially recorded by Pima County.
In June 2013, the Town Council approved the Conceptual Site Plan with the condition that lots along the
west side of the property be limited to one-story homes. The Final Plat depicts a community in the
northeast portion of the property, which is not subject to the one-story restrictions applied to other areas
of the overall development. The Final Plat conforms with the design components (i.e. site layout, access,
pedestrian connectivity, common areas, etc.) approved as part of the Conceptual Site Plan.
The Engineering Staff recommends two conditions of approval (Attachment 2) related to easements. The
conditions do not affect the overall site plan design.
Proposed Improvements:
34.35 acres subdivided into 74 lots
Average lot size: 13,500 sq. ft.
Building height: 30’ feet, 2-story
Common areas throughout the site
Previous Approvals:
September 2013: Conceptual Site Plan
June 2014: Block Plat for entire Maracay at Vistoso subdivision
July 2014: Block 2 Final Plat
October 2014: Block 1 Final Plat
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to APPROVE the Final Plat for Block 4 of the Maracay at Vistoso subdivision, finding that it
meets Town requirements, subject to the conditions in Attachment 2.
OR
I MOVE to DENY the Final Plat for Block 4 of the Maracay at Vistoso subdivision, finding that
___________________.
Attachments
Attachment 1 - Final Plat
Attachment 2 - Conditions of Approval
APPROVALS
I . CLERK OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY,
HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS APPROVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL
OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ON THE DAY OF , 20_.
CLERK, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER
RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT
TOWN ENGINEER
PLANNING MANAGER
WATER UTILITY DIRECTOR
ASSURANCES
DATE
DATE
DATE
DATE
DATE
ASSURANCES IN THE FORM OF THIRD PARTY TRUST AGREEMENT FROM TITLE SECURITY AGENCY
OF ARIZONA AS RECORDED IN SEQUENCE NO. HAS BEEN PROVIDED
TO GUARANTEE DRAINAGE AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS (INCLUDING MONUMENTS)
AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS (ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, GAS, SEWER, WATER) IN
THE SUBDIVISION.
BY:
-:-M"'"A'""YO=R------=TO=WN=-cO=F:-:O=R=O...,..V'""AL:-:-LE=:'Y DATE
ASSURANCES IN THE FORM OF A THIRD PARTY TRUST FROM, TITLE SECURITY AGENCY
OF ARIZONA HAVE BEEN PROVIDED TO GUARANTEE THE RESEEDING OF THIS
SUBDIVISION IN THE EVENT THE PROJECT IS ABANDONED.
WATER ADEQUACY
THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY HAS BEEN DESIGNATED BY THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT
WATER RESOURCES AS HAVING AN ASSURED WATER SUPPLY, PURSUANT TO
---~c.-26
_____________ "'''-''..:T!
1669.52' -----------------[;184.98'-1 z
LEGEND
8
•
---(0)---
• ®
N.A.E.
P.U.E.
SVT
~
C.A.
EHS
IP
SVT
SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY
RIGHT OF WAY
LOT LINE
100 YR. FLOOD LINE
EROSION HAZARD SET-BACK LINE
EASEMENT LINE
SECTI ON LINE
INDICATES BRASS DISK SURVEY
MONUMENT TO BE SET BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR
UPON COMPLETION OF ROAD CONSTRUCTION
FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED
1/2" IRON PARCEL PIN TO BE SET BY A REGISTERED
LAND SURVEYOR UPON COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTS
EXIST. BOUNDARY CORNERS, 1/2" IP TAGGED RLS 12214
EXIST. BOUNDARY CORNERS, 1/2" IP TAGGED RLS 26923
NO ACCESS EASEMENT
PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
SIGHT VISIBILTY TRIANGLE
SECTION CORNER / QUARTER SECTION CORNER
COMMON AREA
EROSION HAZARD SETBACK
IRON PIN
SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE
SHEET INDEX
SHEET 1
SHEETS 2 -6
COVER SHEET
PLAN SHEETS
, ,
i
L=1033.23'
R=740.00
LF80'OO'00"
1
C.A. "/" r---_ ~ 19 20
L=225.08' 2;;:;j .~ 21 22
R=2060.00 _-+--I r----J~ ,f-SHEET 4
LF6'15'37" 3 ~ ~ r---------.J ~ 18 17 16 15
UJ : N89'58'19"E 443.37' 4
~r----
SILVER C.A. HJ"
~, p,
~I
7 5
N80'00'00"W
144.50' --+--f-1 6
N83'29'46"W 422.43'
R=665.00 I c:;: 0
----N90'00'0'O"E -15'56'14" ~ ~
DRIVE 69.60 I'!~
-:i
61 60 L=234.80'
GCtf
R=660.00 ~
LF20'22'59" tv 'CS So.,.
. 0 ~o
N68'00'00"E
118.42'
-. ~
ARS §45-576 AND HEREBY CERTIFIES IN WRITING TO SUPPLY WATER TO THIS SUBDIVISION.
BY:
-W-Ac-TE""-R-U-TI-L-:IT-Y-D-I R'""E-CT-O-R --
RECORDING DATA
STATE OF ARIZONA) FEE __
)SS
COUNTY OF PIMA ) No. __ _
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS FILED FOR RECORD AT THE REQUEST OF THE
WLB GROUP, INC., ON THIS DAY OF ,
20~ AT M. IN SEQUENCE NO. , THEREOF.
F. ANN RODRIGUEZ, PIMA COUNTY RECORDER
BY: ---------------------DEPUTY FOR PIMA COUNTY RECORDER
CERTIFICATION
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE BOUNDARY SURVEY SHOWN ON THIS
PLAT WAS PERFORMED UNDER MY DIRECTION AND THAT ALL EXISTING
AND/OR PROPOSED SURVEY MONUMENTS AND MARKERS SHOWN ARE
CORRECTLY DESCRIBED. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THI PLA
PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECTION.
PETER D. COTE, R.L.S., No. 44121
I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED UNDER MY
DIRECTION AND THAT THE 100-YEAR FLOOD PRONE LIMITS AS
NOTED WERE REVIEWD AND SHOWN UNDER MY DIRECTION.
COREY THOMPSON, P.E. 22217
The
WLB
Group
EXPIRES 9/30/2016
Engineering -Planning • Surveying
Landscape Architecture. Urban Design
Offices located in Tucson. Phoenix,
Flagstaff. AZ. and Las Vegas. NV.
4444 East Broadway
Tucson. Arizona (520) 881-7480
GENERAL NOTES
1. THE GROSS AREA OF THIS SUBDIVISION IS 34.35 ACRES.
THE DENSITY IS 2.09 UNITS PER ACRE. LOT AREA IS 9.28 ACRES.
THE AREA OF PRIVATE STREETS (C.A. "A") IS 5.45 ACRES.
2. TOTAL NUMBER OF RESIDENTI AL LOTS IS 74.
3. COMMON AREA SIZE (ACRES) USE: ::;')q. 2(/ 42··j·gY;~i·t'
C.A. "A" 5.45 PRIVATE STREETS, PUBLIC UTILITIES AND PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS.
C.A. "B" 5.80 OPEN SPACE, DRAINAGE, PUBLIC UTILITIES, AND PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS.
C.A. "C" 0.21 OPEN SPACE, DRAINAGE, RECREATION, AND PUBLIC UTILITIES.
C.A. "0" 0.12 OPEN SPACE, DRAINAGE, AND PUBLIC UTILITIES.
C.A. "E" 0.34 OPEN SPACE, DRAINAGE, AND PUBLIC UTILITIES.
C.A. "F" 0.09 OPEN SPACE, DRAINAGE, SEWER, AND PUBLIC UTILITIES.
C.A. "G" 0.11 OPEN SPACE. DRAINAGE, AND PUBLIC UTILITIES.
C.A. "H" 0.12 OPEN SPACE, DRAINAGE, AND PUBLIC UTILITIES.
C.A. "r" 0.24 OPEN SPACE, DRAINAGE, AND PUBLIC UTILITIES.
C.A. "J" 0.003 OPEN SPACE, DRAINAGE, AND PUBLIC UTILITIES.
4. ALL STREETS ARE PRIVATE. MILES OF PRIVATE STREETS = 0.83 MILES
5. THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT IS 11,200 S.F. (0.26 AC.)
6. THE MAXIMUM LOT SIZE FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT IS 19,489 S.F. (0.45 AC.)
7. THE AVERAGE LOT SIZE FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT IS 13,490 S.F. (0.31 AC.)
8. MAXIMUM PERMITTED BUILDING HEIGHT IS LIMITED TO 30 FEET, TWO (2) STORIES.
9. BUILDING SETBACK PROVISIONS: FRONT-20 FEET
SIDE-5 OR 0 FEET
REAR-l0 FEET
10. NO ADDITIONAL ON STREET PARKING IS PROVIDED FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT.
R,A.l\iCHG V1ST0SD
NBGHBORHOOD i l)
P.ARCEL G
sr.:. 55, M&P PC. 13
NOTARY
STATE OF ARIZONA) FEE __
)SS
COUNTY OF PIMA ) No. __ _
ON THIS, THE DAY OF • 2014, BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED
PERSONALLY APPEARED. WHO ACKNOIU:DGED SELF TO BE
____ TIRE SECURITY AGENCY OF ARIZONA, INC. AND BEING AUTHORIZED SO TO DO,
EXECUTED THE FORGOING INSTRUMENT FOR THE PURPOSE THEREIN CONTAINED BY SELF AS
TRUST OFFl CER.
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: NOTARY PUBLI C
11. EXISTING ZONING: RANCHO VISTOSO P.A.D. -MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL.
12. NO FURTHER SUBDIVISION OF ANY LOT OR PARCEL SHOWN SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL.
13. THE BASIS OF BEARING FOR THIS PROJECT IS THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, TOWN
OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA. SAID BEARING BEING: N89'47'14"E, PER THE BLOCK PLAT SEQ. NO. 20142480246.
14. THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL CERTIFY AS TO THE FORM, LINE AND FUNCTION OF ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE ROADWAYS AND DRAINAGE STRUCTURES BEFORE THE RELEASE OF
ASSURANCES.
15. THE PROPERTY OWNER, HIS SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNS, OR A DEDICATED HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION AGREES TO 1) KEEP ALL COMMON AREAS MAINTAINED IN A WEED-FREE, TRASH-FREE
CONDITION, 2) REPLACE ANY DEAD PLANT MATERIALS WITHIN 90 DAYS, AND 3) MAINTAIN THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IN PROPER WORKING ORDER.
16. THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL BE SERVED BY ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY (OVWU) WHICH HAS BEEN DESIGNATED AS HAVING AN ASSURED 100-YEAR WATER SUPPLY BY THE DIRECTOR OF WATER
RESOURCES.
17. UTILITIES WILL BE LOCATED UNDERGROUND IN CONFORMANCE WITH ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION AMENDED GENERAL ORDER U-48.
18. ALL LANDSCAPING WITHIN ALL PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LANDSCAPE PLANTING GUIDELINES PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER
RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT, ENGINEERING DESIGN STANDARDS 2012, SUBSECTION 7.7 ..
19. NO PERMITS FOR PERMANENT STRUCTURES (I.E. MASONRY WALLS, FENCES, ETC.) ON OR THROUGH THE PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENT WILL BE ISSUED WITHOUT SEPARATE WRITTEN CONSENT OF
PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT.
20. NO FINAL INSPECTION FOR ANY LOT WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHALL BE APPROVED UNTIL A BUILDING CODE OFFICIAL HAS VERIFIED CONSTRUCTION ON THE LOT IS COMPLETE AND
SIDEWALKS HAVE BEEN INSTALLED, PROPERTY LINE TO PROPERTY LINE.
21. A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY SANITARY SEWER WORK ON THIS
PROJECT.
22. CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION FROM PIMA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY IS REQUIRED BEFORE BEGINNING ANY SANITARY SEWER WORK ON THIS PROJECT. APPROVAL OF
THIS FINAL PLAT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION.
23. INTERIOR PROPERTY CORNERS AND CENTERLINE MONUMENTATION SHALL BE SET AS SOON AS COMPLETION OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE AND IMPROVEMENTS MAKE IT PRACTICAL TO DO SO. IF
SUCH MONUMENTS SHOULD DIFFER FROM THE TYPE DESCRIBED ON THE FINAL PLAT, A RECORD OF SURVEY PLAT SHALL BE RECORDED SHOWING THESE DIFFERENCES.
24. THIS SUBDIVISION WILL BE SERVICED BY ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY.
25. THE AREA BETWEEN 100 YEAR FLOOD REPRESENTS AN AREA THAT MAY BE SUBJECT TO FLOODING FROM A 100 YEAR FREQUENCY FLOOD AND ALL LAND IN THIS AREA WILL BE RESTRICTED TO
USES THAT ARE COMPATIBLE WITH FLOOD PLAN MANAGEMENT AS APPROVED BY THE TOWN ENGINEER.
26. NO IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN THIRTY (30) AND SEVENTY-TWO (72) INCHES IN HEIGHT RELATIVE TO THE ADJACENT ROADWAY WHICH MIGHT INTERFERE WITH THE PURPOSE AND INTENT OF THE
SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE SHALL BE PERMITTED, PLACED OR MAINTAINED WITHIN THE SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLES SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. PROPERTY OWNERS SHALL MAINTAIN PLANTINGS
TO ENSURE UNOBSTRUCTED VISIBILITY TO MOTORISTS. ALL SHRUBS, ACCENTS AND GROUNDCOVERS SHALL NOT EXCEED THIRTY (30) INCHES IN HEIGHT WITHIN THE SIGHT VISIBILITY
TRIANGLES. TREES WITHIN THE SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLES WILL BE MAINTAINED TO ENSURE THAT BRANCHES/FOLIAGE IS NOT BELOW A HEIGHT OF SEVENTY-TWO (72) INCHES
27. GATES AND LOCKS LIMITING THE MAINTENANCE AND ACCESS THROUGH THE PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENT SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ENGINEERING DESIGN STANDARDS 2012,
SUBSECTION 7.5.
CGURSE
3" = 1 MILE
DEDICATION
13 18
'l-'-Y'i\;'(4.119
19
'/>L----'----'--,-"It
LOCATION MAP
A PORTION OF SECTION 26
Tl1S, R13E, G & S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY,
PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA
30
1
'Nf., THE UNDERSIGNED, HEREBY WARRANT THAT 'Nf. ARE ALL AND THE ONLY PARTIES HAVING ANY
RECORD TITLE INTEREST IN THE LAND SHOVvN ON THIS PLAT AND 'Nf. CONSENT TO THE
SUBDIVISION OF SAID LAND IN THE MANNER SHOVvN HEREON.
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, OUR SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, DO HEREBY SAVE THE TOWN OF
ORO VALLEY, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, THEIR EMPLOYEES, OFFICERS, AND AGENTS
HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES RELATED TO THE USE OF SAID
LANDS NOW AND IN THE FUTURE BY REASON OF FLOODING, FLOWAGE, EROSION, OR
DAMAGE CAUSED BY WATER, WHETHER SURFACE FLOOD, OR RAINFALL. IT IS FURTHER
UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED THAT NATURAL DRAINAGE SHALL NOT BE ALTERED,
DISTURBED, OR OBSTRUCTED OTHER THAN AS SHOWN HEREON WITHOUT THE WRITTEN
APPROVAL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL.
WE HEREBY CONVEY TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY AND ALL PUBLIC UTILITY COMPANIES
EASEMENTS AS SHOWN HEREON FOR THE PURPOSE OF ACCESS, INSTALLATION, AND
MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC SEWERS AND UTILITIES AND OTHER USES AS DESIGNATED BY
THIS PLAT.
WE THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY GRANT TO PIMA COUNTY COMMON AREA "A" AS PUBLIC
SEWER EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF ACCESS, INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE,
CONSTRUCTION AND REPLACEMENT OF PUBLIC SEWERS.
COMMON AREA "A", AS SHOWN HEREON, IS RESERVED FOR THE PRIVATE USE AND
CONVENIENCE OF ALL OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION, THEIR GUESTS
AND INVITEES, AND (EXCEPT FOR DRAINAGE WAYS), FOR THE ACCESS, INSTALLATION,
MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION AND REPLACEMENT OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND
SEWERS.
THE PUBLIC PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENT SHOWN ON THIS PLAT IS DEDICATED TO
THE PUBLIC TO PROVIDE FOR PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ONLY. THE LOT OWNERS
ASSOCIATION ACCEPTS ALL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CONTROL, MAINTENANCE, SAFETY
AND LIABILITY OF THE EASEMENT AND ANY IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE EASEMENT.
TITLE TO THE LAND OF ALL COMMON AREAS AND DRAINAGEWAYS SHALL BE VESTED IN
AN ASSOCIATION OF INDIVIDUAL LOT OWNERS AS ESTABLISHED BY COVENANTS,
CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS RECORDED IN SEQUENCE NO. IN THE
OFFICE OF THE PIMA COUNTY RECORDER. EACH AND EVERY LOT OWNER WITHIN THE
SUBDIVISION SHALL BE A MEMBER OF THE ASSOCIATION, WHICH WILL ACCEPT ALL
RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CONTROL, MAINTENANCE, SAFETY AND LIABILITY OF ALL
COMMON AREAS WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION AS SHOWN HEREON.
TITLE SECURITY AGENCY OF ARIZONA, LLC., A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
ABA TITLE SECURITY AGENCY, LLC AS TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST NUMBER 201405-T AS
TRUSTEE ONLY AND NOT OTHERWISE.
BENEFl CI ARY OF TRUST 201405-T:
MARACAY 91 LLC.
15279 N. SCOTTSDALE RD. STE. 300
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85254
DATE
OVt2t4-26
FINAL PLAT
MARACAY AT VISTOSO
BLOCK 4
LOTS 1 THRU 74 AND COMMON AREAS .. A" THRU .. J"
BEING A RESUBDIVISION OF MARACAY HOMES AT VISTOSO,
BLOCKS 1 THROUGH 5 AND COMMON AREA -A-AS RECORDED IN
SEQ., 20142480246. BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 26 TOWIISHIP
11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, G Be S.R.M, TOWII OF ORO VAUEY,
PIMA COUNTY ARIZONA
REF: 0V1214-02 SEPlEhtBER 2014 'SHEET 1 OF 5
SEQ. #:
• •
::tI:::
• o w
(/)
~
5
I
Vl
I
~
I
'" u o
-.J m
/'
~
.x
() o
~
Q. > co
£ --o
Q.
'" o
I -::!
C o
Cl
~
3-o
~
I
<.!>
~ w
? o
If) o
If)
OX)
/'
z
: ..
: ..... . .....
, .
'. .' .. '~
... :' '.::; "': .
. '
. ... '. --: .; ::., : ':' ..... ; ::. :' .•..
..... . .: : ',,: : ..... ',,: .....
~::':~ ~ .:"':. C': ; .. :.-. ". .... .... '.' ..... ..'
:'.~ ;":': :: :':. :: ::::: ;"': :':. :: ~::':
.: .. ~.: : .. : .. : .... : .... : ... : .: .... :.: .. :
/
,/
/
,/
/
/
/
/
/
. '.
. , .. .....
.. '.
.... .
'" .
0'
. '.
" ..
'" . '" .
40'
' .. " .. .... ;
.
,
eo' 120" ..
,/
'" .
,/
/
, .
'" . '" .
LOT 67
12,814 SQ FT
0.29 AC
'" . .....
. '. . . '.
' .... '
' .. '. "
.'
::~' .. ::::;':" ....
. ''-: ".
". : ....
'.' .. '
. .
'" .
The
WLB
Group
Engineering. Planning • Surveying
Landscape Architecture. Urban Design
Offices located in Tucson, Phoenix,
Flagstaff, AZ. and Las Vegas. NV.
4444 East Broad~ay
Tucson, Arizono (520) 881-7480
.....
'" .
LOT 66
12,814 SQ FT
0.29 AC
:' '"
.'
' ..
' ..
' ..
EROSION HAZARD LINE TABLE
. ' . .. , . . ' . " .
. ' .
----------
.. ' . .. ' .
--
.. ' . .. ' . .... . ....... ..... .
...................................................................................... .. ... .....
D
N90'OO'00"E
69.60'
D
. ....
------
-_ 'AINAGt
'" .
-
" .. '" . ' .. ' ..
' .. ' ..
' .. ...
' ..
-----
197 98 ' - --. CON,<'7h N88'37'20"E . -. --. .:J 'IiUCT! l. "".2 ~~~~0,..-=-==~r,...Cfl1i111=C~3~7.~98f' 1~~,8300:O.00'0'~~1~1~~f· 88iD.0.Q(00r' =1 --. _D!!.r. 11~~ SLOOPt 34.80' ~---z I ~ ---! .. ..PG. 14{JAND ACC£.
C"'i (5 ;.. I 0 -. _ '/. Ss /Os.', --, Iq, --c·,.,.,r
LOT 65
12,814 SQ FT
0.29 AC
C, A, "A"
237,195 SQ, FT.
5.45 acres
LOT 64
12,814 SQ FT
0.29 AC
LOT 63
12,045 SQ FT
0.28 AC
z
~g
-1>0 ' ON . N o ..
0-1>0 .. O.
~
LOT 62
11,200 SQ FT
0,26 AC
z o
~ ~
-1>0 ' ON . N o ..
(J1-1>o • O •
~
-C62 - --37,98' - - --77.84' -C6-'3
N88'37'20"E N88'37'20"E
LOT 40
17,004 SQ FT
0.39 AC
N88'37'20"E
115.81'
r" z N88'37'20"E -_
o -
LOT 61
12,143 SQ FT
0.28 AC
~ ---80.00'----'-.-. ~
N. I -'-.-. V: '0 ~ I -. -. ~ <-Yo\"
.. I -. -. .4<.. " ~ I ;x~"'\ ~ :5 *'0 \~~
C!. ::: LOT 60 ~I ~ f-'
".. 11,777 SQ FT ~I N /-.,
I~
lb.
g. 0.27 AC 8.1 ~ / / '" ......
I~ ~ -. I '0 -"',
I d!'1i$ 100 YEAR FLOOD LINE I
: / c, A, "B" f( 250,268 SQ. FT.
LOT 59
12,289 SQ FT
0.28 AC
~ 5.75 acres ~~ EROSION HAZARD SETBACK
::!: I .. .f!. 8
, !S; ~ ~\ to-~, G:!
'\ \", (~ 100 YEAR FLOOD LINE 'f:> <t" ,..., ~-''t>. , ~I;(o, /
~ ~ \ 13
I/~ l o~ • LO v . It" r:::
18 IU) ~~ <t,~.' ''t>~. ~
«' 1:: ~
I
LINE LENGTH
EHL9 9.17
EHL10 80.98
EHL11 17.12
EHL12 58.26
EHL13 63.85
EHL14 69.13
EHL15 67.37
EHL16 34.64
EHL17 20.34
EHL18 24.32
100 YEAR FLOOD LINE TABLE
LINE LENGTH BEARING
FL1 13.06 543'16'11"W
FL2 29.53 S58'34'50"W
FL3 48.36 540'35'13"W
FL4 67.30 S22'38'53"W
FL5 22.33 510'04' 45"W
FL6 30.86 560'18'59"E
FL7 11.99 511'00'13"W
. .. ."
SEE SHEET 4 '.' '.'
. ". ; ....
FL8 17.58 546'48'22"W .' .....
FL9 20.29 528'59'00"W
FL10 16.68 506'59'02"E
FL11 15.12 53T31'02"W
FL12 68.68 522'12'52"E
FL13 10.09 S30'54'05"W ' .. '" , ' ..
' .. . .
. ", . '.
.. ' .. '
BEARING
566'38'31"W
S23'21'29"E
530'54'05"W
S23'21'29"E
N05'20'31 "w
N15'49'36"E
N26'35'41"E
N42'54'07"E
N55'29'53"E
N64'34' 40"E
.......... ' ..... '.
'. ::"'::: ':":: '. .: : ' .. : : ' .. :',,:',,:
..... ,' ... : :: .... : ... : .. .
: . .. ... ,. " .. ..
',,: ',,: ',,:: ...... :: .. .
· .... ' .. . '. .., ... . · ".:':" , · ' .. ' "':--:' :
--".:".: :--. . . '. . ..
:.:': ',,: : ... :
... _ .. . "" .
:.,:(". : .
100 YEAR FLOOD LINE TABLE
LINE LENGTH BEARING
FL14 17.03 505'38'04"E
FL15 68.86 522'54' 40"E
FL16 9.16 566'38'31"W
FL33 18.30 521'06 '11 "E
FL34 9.98 501'58'24"W
FL35 18.26 N36"07'02"W
FL36 19.71 N24"04'35"W
FL37 35.23 N01'27'OO"W
FL38 26.93 N30'13'51 "w
FL39 15.54 NOO"02' 42"W
FL40 10.38 N40'56'00"E
FL41 30.86 554'53'32"E
FL42 18.83 51T22'30"E
.. .. OV1214-26 ... ' .-", .-". ......
EXPIRES /2015
IN COMPLIANCE WllH CER-nFICA -nON
SHOWN ON SHEET ONE REF: 0V1214-02
FINAL PLAT
MARACAY AT VISTOSO
BLOCK 4
LOTS 1 THRU 74 AND CO~~ON AREAS -A-THRU -J-
BEING A RESUBDIVISION OF MMACAY HOMES AT VISTOSO,
BLOCKS 1 lHROUGH 5 AND COMMON MEA -A-AS RECORDED IN
SEQ,' 20142480246, BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 26 TOYtf.!SHIP
11 SOUlH, RANGE 13 EAST, G Be s'R.M, TOYtf.! OF ORO VALLEY,
PIMA COUNTY, MIZONA
SEPlEMBER 2014 SHEET
SEQ. #:
••
• o w
(/)
en ,.
"1J
n
~I
I
U1
I ...
I
'" U o
..J
~ ...
"" u o
~
"-> en c
~
~ o
"-
Q)
(j
I
~
::l
C o o
~
I
<..'l
~ w
? o
lfl o
lfl
00 ::;-
z
, .. "', ....... " "
~"":'~ ;':':", ~.< :':':", : .... ' :':':", ';'
, ....
, .', .", .......
'".' '" ~ ',: ~
The
WLB
Group
o·
... . "', .
/
I
/
I .. .. .. .. ..
"
~ .. .. ..
~ .. ............ : ~~ : ..... .
"
'. . '. ' ... : . " . . . . "
: .... :": :.':' >,' .. ..... ..,'.' ,. ~ '. ,.' : '. ,
~ ,. \-• IIiII
~
... '1{J.00· Jr .... ,' .... # t'"J I ~~ SEE SHEET 3 .... .... ..... ,
:'''' I /1 -II. ~ .... • ~ ~ ........ ,
iIIII
LOT 70
12,814 SQ FT
0.29 AC
IIii\!\
I !
!
! IJ ' / ~<J'~ ~ .. .......-: ..... . .~ J~ " / .l1tqOo~"~ ~ _ .. .. .... ,
& I'; D;! ~~ .... -.... ~\'" ~
I
W /u
.. ,
..
.'
'.
,
· .' · .. • ·
.. . .
. .
.. . ' . . .
,
• . , " •
I
/
I
/
~ I / LOT 36 1.j"'!J<j\S't .... . ~ / l' / 13'~~f2 ~ FT ~ ~1 '. , : : ~ ~ ~ I ~~ / c§>. ~ LOT 27 ". , ~ ~
I
,,' . .. ..
',' .
.
.
I
LOT 71
12,606 SQ FT
0.29 AC
• ~ § / N69'4')' .... !lJ"! 16,~~~FT C. A. "B" ...... , ..... ___ .~ .......... .
Nil",,,,, .'~ ~ 5.S0 oc:res ·.t _. '~1. .t. '" 42"1.1. ,& I 253,072 SQ. FT. ~
~~, It> I TV. 00' tS J 001 'N ' ..... o:'!l\ .' .• ~ ~ ,,·.v S30'06'56"E .... ~'O ;)U ;...., s.;; I "" () II C? "7. 27.25' ·.~I ",C! ,.,I).&r<:i ,
r<) ~ I IY 5J318"W C!il DO .. ,
I
• ".: • '0' : •• ' " •• ~'" •.••• .. , " ., . '.' .
'; ; '0 •• • : '".' '".' '".'
gl~~--~N~80~'0~0~'O~0~"W~ ___ @; " I 132.21' 1/)1 <'11 -.J LOT 35 ,
,140.00' I 13,OS7 SQ FT .~ I ~
I'LLN.A.f. I 010 • I 0.30 AC ~ • ~. ,
'",'
~I r.... 8 LOT 26 ~ ~ 1tgr sl~ / ~ I ; ~I § ~ 12':is %FT "A" ? .\ ....... .
0.26 AC Ilob I 580'00'00"" C.A. \\ ,
.;--40.00' 1/,1" 237,195 SQ. FT. . ,'. 40.00' 1 I d I 140.00' 5.~ acres \
/
~ I DO IIlIr. P.U.f. 5 N8 0,(}()'OO"W ~\ LOT 26 ,
n.. '"' f'----~~~r~--_L'J 80'00'00'" "I 19,275 SQ FT , t'i ~ ..... ;; e / N80'00'00"W I ~~ t:.. ~/ LOT 34 140.00' c. 26.00' ::;:1 0.44 AC ~ & "Ii~i 1 140.00' I, II;! g col 11'~~6SfcFT ~ , ~;' ,
• <ri I tJ :;:{"; I. ,0 8
;& ~ ,ff.o! S£~ b ~ :5 ~ S80'OO'OO"" ~ 11.~~~6 Sfc FT ",~ / S79 '47'21"r
~! ~ <\I 8 Z ~ LOT 29
1 10 I/) lsi c" I c. ,/~, I 75. 8J' ~ I~ j:e / 140.00' ~/~ ~ #
N 10' P.U.£/ C;; r<) 0 I S80,(}()'00"£ / 1fgr S~~ # ~:~~·W -: ~/ LOT 33 ~ 140.00' I;:!;! 0.35 AC ,~~ "# ..
I
b ~ 1f.gr sltr I '~OO' I H co 11,200 SQ FT I, 25.00' ~ I S79'47'21"'" # g co I sor' _ -, 0.26 AC --25.00' I c. #
W DO. I I~oo' ~
22.61! 1 S8 ..; 11".8 I .~ 080'11 S8 I k: gil LOT 24 t-..... TI~! "I L1 C ~,J'OO'OOt~d. IJ9.97~ _C6 /: g COl LOT 32.~ I~~.~~?·E / ~ §~ ~I 14-'~~2SfcFT f!? I ··· .....
/
O · I· .---0 I 11,899 SQ FT .8 G I ~ ~~ II !:y~y # o C3 -I 0.27 AC 0 I v, ....
!!? 0
1 ~ I/) P 80 ~~/!:! I ~I ~ 8' PUBLIC PEDESTRIAN / ~ ~ LOT 31 i ~ i ;j I S79'47'21"r #
40.00' I-.......--ACCESS EASEMENT PER L2 G> C7 W 11,S99 SQ FT Ib::j ~ I 165.67' • ';5;w:o~~tHl__ THI S PLAT ~ ~ ~ S80'OO'Oo'r"': 0.27 AC I 0 ~ •
/
S80'OO'OO' I _ _ I ~ ~ ~ 139.49' ,<f I ~ ~ I ~.;' •
I .4.1 - _ .102.50' -I 8 . R? • .~ 't:y ~I ~ S80'OO'OO"[ -_ S80'OO'o(Yof ~ ~ S80'OO'00"£ / ~ ~ M!/ 1f.?of ~fr .# ....
o <:> r-.;J P _ 580'00'00"" c: A. ..C' .. ~ ~ ~ IJ9.49' _ g I .4. •
p I co I 0 " 5,JJJ so 278.98' I/) C;; I 0.31 AC ,~.
; ..1/ @ 237,195 SQ. FT. - _ _ JJO 00' gl I Cl7 I~~ # : ..... j ..... ~ .. ~ _ _ _ 5.45 acres .. 7 '-__ CONAx 1Y. 2JO.00' C;; ~.... #
/"" -_ _ :' ~ ; .................................... -.-.. ~ I ."-.-: ...... .a .. ~ .. ~ -_ _ (PRlVAifsiii£c~T)Y -_ _ § oir.VTS£c
; -_ . ~ : ••..•.•.•••.•.. ..~.,'. : •..••.•..•... _ _ _ <\I AIL "s" #
: .. i ............ .......... ': ..... ~:.' : : ................ ~ .. -_ _ _ 1 -SliccI.,6 -26.48' #
I
I
.: : ", ....... ..... .
' ..
j :.: ..... :' r : : i···;···· .... ··· ....... ~ _ _ _ 558.98' L"'179.81' ~
! ./! i / ! SE:'E' SH EET:' 5 ·· .. ······r······ .. ~ .. ~ .. ~ .. ~ .. -~~~. C's ~ ~
. . . . . . ..... ---~Oo' ... ;' ; :: :: .......... -... '--..... C's< ~
. . .. .
.
.
i ;: i:' : j ........... ......... ~<J...'.l ~ ...
:. ........ i: ...:' . :' : ......... ~ .... ""'<0' ,,~
......................... . : j :.::' j : ...... ~ ~ <e. U'l's~ ~
.................... .' .' ...... '.' ;" .:. ;---.... . ..... ~~.r. ~~" ~ ~ ~ .........
. .. . .;: ...... ': ... : ............. . .... ~ 7;~~. '6~'~ ~
. .
.... . . .
.'
..
. .
... '. , ... . . ..'
.. . .. ..
.'
..
co
.... tij
W ······ ..
J: en
W ". W ,' ". : . ..... ffj
' ..
..
.. '
'.
'.
.'
..
'.:
..
,..
..
! .
',:
.. ' ..
.
,
'.
. .
. . .. ~ .9.9~ SVT SEE / ~
;........ ' .. ~ "DETAIL ·C· ~
..... ............... ' .. ~ , SHEET 6 / .. #
..
40' 80' 120'
Engineering -Planning -Surveying
Landscape Architecture. Urban Design
Offices located in Tucson. Phoenix,
Flagstaff, AZ. and Las Vegas. NV.
4444 East Broad~ay
Tucson, Arizona (520) BB1-7480
. ................................................. .' . '. .~ ~ )I .##
. ...................... . ~ .~ ..... .
'.. ~. '~ ......
/ V " . .
'.
EXPIRES 3/31/2015
IN COMPLIANCE WITH CERTIFICATION
SHOWN ON SHEET ONE REF: 0V1214-02
OV1214-26
FINAL PLAT
MARACAY AT VISTOSO
BLOCK 4
LOTS 1 THRU 7J. AND COMMON AREAS -A-THRU -J-
EEING A RESUBDIVISION OF MARACAY HOMES AT VISlOSO.
BLOCKS 1 lHROUGH 5 AND cot.IAON AREA -A-AS RE<XKIED IN
SEQ.' 20142480246, EEING A PORTION OF SECTION 26 TOYttlSHIP
11 SOUlH. RANGE 13 EAST, G I: S.R.M. TOYttI OF ORO VALLEY.
SEPlEMBER 2014 PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONASHEET 3 or 5
SEQ. #:
• •
=It:::
• o
UJ
(/')
•
• · •
• ..
-'" u o
m ,.,.-
"-LL ,.,.-
'" " ~
~ o
"-
OJ o
I
~
:J
" o o
~ o >-
3-o
~ w z ,.,.-
o
Lf)
o
Lf)
00
z
~ .. ~ :". ; :~: .. :'. r" .:' ........ . ... " .... ' ..... '. '.::"'::; ..... :; : .'-" '. ...... . .'-.. . ..... .... .. .. . .... .. .: : ' .. : : ' .... ' .. : .....
~:::~ ~ .:"': (": ~,< '. ........ '.' ..... '.'
": (':': ;; ,"'. ;; :::.: (': ,":. ;: ~:::
.: .. ".: : .. : .. : .... : .... ::.: .: .... :.: .. :
The
WLB
Group
O' 40'
.
.
" ' . . . . . :
. '. '. . .' . . . . , ..
.
.
.
, ,
, .......................... · .. ··· ...... SEE SHEET 4 :
...... /' ............................ .
.
.
.
~I
. .
".
. ".
" ..
'" . '" . ".
'" . .......
'" . . . , ...
'" . " .. '" . . . '" . ". '" .
...... .
. ... '. :
.
.
. '. . ... .. . . . . . , ... . . .. ....
, ...
'" ,
. '.' :". . .
' ... ' .; ..
. . . . ' .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .... " . . . . . " .. '" .
. . . . .
'.' .
'" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , ·e(r...... .. .......
" . . ..... . . . . ......
.' ~/. I • -
'f'" ........... .
:. ~ 'b 1 N80iJO'Qci-W---~ ~ ~_ % \ '. c:fr'C50 --_70.J!O~ --_ ~
'" .
.
.
, , , ,
: .. ,..... ..' , . . . . . . . ' .,........ / ......... ; . . . . , . . . ' , . . ' . . . , . . . . . . . . .......... ,/
. .'. . I ········· . : . . . . . . . . . . ,
:... lit .............. . .... I '" . '" . '" . ' .. '. '. ....... .
. . . . ... '.'
. ............. , , ..... . , ,
: ...... . ,
' .. . . ' . ,
.: : ". . ... ,' . ..... .
,,'
. . . . . . . . . . .. '
. .... .. '
:
. .
---....... ,
J06.48·---~ -." ........ ~ .. ...
: -~-" l :;J 1 149.B9·-~ ~ ~ -1. .! ----lJ9:.o0·
:--40.00' I ~ i:1 I b C34 /. • ;;; 1 -
: 40.00' ,II) , 0 !::' 11). to' ; to J 0 / .-~ cti I.i') _ J
: .kJ , I Q;) LOT 1 / _0; , :G Q:j "l /
SEE: SHEET 6 -~ __ BO,OO'
~r ------_
, 12.000 SQ FT 0 I
:j § ,'! 0.28 AC 25.~00 "I 'I ~ --.~,. N.A.E. I
: ;g , 25.00' iRl
: ~ I 50 • ''''; i ;... t: .. ! NBO'OO'OO"W k: I /!f!
I . l! I 150.00' ~
. . Ii! 8 : ::S;' I~"' ... I. / "
I "'''' 0 ~ Ud-O ! C? / '"
"
-1:5 LOT 2 /" ~
.:.:': :;:',:: 0.28 AC 18 ~ I f!£
LOT 19
12,395 SQ FT
0.28 AC LOT 20
12,346 SQ FT
0.28 AC
c.:
'b -
LOT 21
12.290 SQ FT
0.28 AC
.kJ
"I.
.-Q;) 0'" !">...;
<»11)
0-
~
--_ 76.47' -. -. ..... ~.~ ...... . ... ,
LOT 22
12,235 SQ FT
0.28 AC
C49 •
It;?
J~ co,, -:-I N.A.E.
"I II)
",I
II) -
C'18 ......... . ... ~~ .. ,: ....
~, ...... ~ .:., ~ #/ ~.~
...... ..~ ... :#~ / : ~~
• ..
..
' ...
!:;.! I ,..... 12,000 SQ FT / ~"r $
r;··· .... : /1 g fJ ~
::.:.:.:,' .: .... :. I g fl __ ~NB~0~·2;9·~48~·!IV_J .kJ ~
::'::.: N8 BO.OO' ·':i.. 0'()0'00"1V 1
C. A. ''E''
15,021 SQ. FT.
0.34 acres
~£~~ ~;~~ ~/ :~ ~ ... ~ # /~-!J> / ?:ss. ~ ~
, : ' .
. ".: : .' .
' ..
.c.,\ U / ~ .
. '.
..' .
. ,
rrj / ::: .. :f Q;) ~ tB / 150.00' I .kJ;:j ,.kJ .t:3 t:! BO.OO· §
,::;:.: .,'.. C? /;Ii!; /0 I· .8;:.8 ~". g/ BO.oo· J20,oO'
. ;:::.::: .... ~ S 1 ~ /:fl ts ~ ts 8 ~!'OI ':' .. j.!!, ." 1 Q;) LOT 3 I r:? ~ ~ b U ~1 BO.OO·
LOT 14
15,787 SQ FT
0.36 AC
~ ~~ArV" / lI'~{.?~.9". ~
~:t>" \-LOT 48 " 4Y, ";0 '" / / .-; (",~ 13.814 SQ FT : .. '* c:JV c,~/ '4~~ 0.32 AC
.
.
.
80'
i.i.!. I ,. N 11'~~i8~CFT I ~ ~ ~ !
LOT 18
13,031 SQ FT
0.30 AC
~ :::. ~
':!.~ .. ""
' .... :; II) :;; ° NBO'() /. .-I-
.kJ ......
-Q:l
lL P I 0'00 "IV 1::: " 0
.... I <I~! 147.7B' I,,· -~/ ">1 -~ _0,
oCl:! !">o
<»<0
0-<:
LOT 17
12,702 SQ FT
0.29 AC
.kJ "'. .-<» 0<0
!'lq)
<»11)
0-
LOT 16
12.367 SQ FT
0.28 AC
.kJ
"I.
-<» I ,.. I "<I'~I 1 0 1-.--'1:0 <:..>
8 0 LOT 4 /~ ~ i:'''I: 1 o i g I~' '!::! ;. 1 ~ 11,513 SQ FT .....
" '5.22' I 0.26 AC I ;
~
0"<1'
!'lC'oS <»11)
0-~
LOT 15
17,935 SQ FT
0.41 AC
I c:: / I.
I 1 4J II") ~
; I 1")(,) :t 129.2B· - \ Ii
-J 14 4.50;
70.10;---S83'29'46'£ BO.11·----_
NB3'29' 46"W SIL VEO CASSL" BO.ll' ---9,21-;-
I
I
I
\
120'
Engineering -Planning -Surveying
Landscape Architecture. Urban Design
Offices located in Tucson. Phoenix.
Flagstaff, AZ. and Las Vegas, NV.
4444 East Broad~ay
Tucson, Arizona (520) BB1-7480
C. A. "A "'----::: -__ _ (PRIVA1E S1Rrrry PLACE 259.52'
~~~~ ~ C', 545 ____ 3~09.71· I' -..... . acres • 57 2 l!l ~ 587'15'38 W . ~ _ -. _____ • (\(1' ~ A. "J'--' ~r~~~~~-v. t~~~~=j~S~B3~.2~.~~~~~~-;"-"~jS~~~':O::::~~_R:-:'B~~:.~~ 115 SQ, FT, io '.kJS~ ___ 45.62~ _ jj.78'--__ 68.37' 946'£ 218.52' 8 L=124.0S' -
0.003 acres "l I", -BO 00' :Q ~~ '" L..,. 0 -----.: ~
..,. I"'> II) -wr ---70.15' C28 ell_ ~ ~ ~ ------~ ~ ~ b I[ir;,t 1
l' N.A.E. 1 -I ~ ci N 1
~I
II) ..,..
-"II) ....,I,,!
• "l
""'0 .. -~o
!">,
~I <:
I
LOT 5
11.334 SQ FT
0.26 AC
BO.OO·
N83'29'46"W
.... . ......... ' .. ' .. ' . .. ' ... ' ..... ' .. ... " .. , ..... .
,'M. • .; : ' .. ; : ••• ,' ' .. ; ... ..
.. ...... :'-' .. n :."
~ ,.",,1
... ~ I~",,"O'JI __ I leC!
0": ~b ~ IUr-r°1
!""l ~ .. 0 • I I ~ -LOT 6 ~ g LOT 7 .:t. g .~i ~ I
11,989 SQ FT ~ -g 0 LOT 8 :t. • ..,. I'
0.28 AC v, 12,000 SQ FT • II) • I '" -,"
0.28 AC ~ -12.001 SQ FT g, 0 g I~
0.28 AC ig!f! io :!!?
"'I IX I
80.00' l' N.A.E. i
I J
J i BO.OO· 25.00' I
422.43'
LOT 9
15,565 SQ FT
0.36 AC
77.43'
LOT 10
11.529 SQ FT
0.26 AC
/ ~ ~ro &" / ~. ~ 'ff," ~ ~/ ~.~
d ~ ~, )/ ,,<,(-~.
LOT 11
11.251 SQ FT
0.26 AC
EXPIRES 3/31/2015
~ ~~, C"> {So'
'" ~"\ ~ ~;, J?;:,' ~ Ifs~
, ~ ']; .... ". " 0 '£s> ' ..; ~ ". '<7 JQ ...
LOT 12
11,921 SQ FT
0.27 AC
· ......... ' ..... '. '.:~"'::: :"':: '.
'.' : ".: : ..... ',,: ',,:
.... ".~. ~ . "> c"> ...
'q-, '" ".r'
"'1f' "',
LOT 13
12.886 SQ FT
0.30 AC
,"'. ,"'.: ; .. . . . ' ... .
: '!. .• • '.' '.' .....
.' .. ' ... ' .. , ....... ... ' .. , .. '. ; ...... ~' ", ...
' ......... ',,: : ". ".: : ...
" ...... . ... " .. . · .' .. · . ;.'. . · " .. .. ' ....
'. . ..... .
: "~': .:::. :'i' : ;
OV1214-26
FINAL PLAT
MARACAY AT VISTOSO
BLOCK 4
LOTS 1 THRU 7J. AND COMMON AREAS -A-THRU -J-
EEING A RESUBDIVISION OF MARACAY HOMES AT VISlOSO,
BLOCKS 1 lHROUGH 5 AND cot.IAON AREA -A-AS RE<XKIED IN
SEQ.' 20142480246, EEING A PORTION OF SECTION 26 TOYttlSHIP
11 SOUlH, RANGE 13 EAST, G I: S.R.M. TOYttI OF ORO VALLEY,
IN COMPLIANCE WITH CERTIFICATION
SHOWN ON SHEET ONE REF: 0V1214-02 SEPlEMBER 2014 PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONASHEET 4 or 5
SEQ. #:
•• =It:::
• o
UJ
(/')
'" 3:
CJ
ui
~I
I
U1
I
<t
I
'" u o
..J m
/'
<t
-'" u o
m
/'
"-LL
/'
'" " ~
~ o
"-
OJ o
I
~
:J
" o o
~ o >-
3-o
~
I
<.:J
~ w z
/' o
Lf)
o
Lf)
00
z
No. RADIU5
Cl 25.00'
C2 25.00'
C3 55.72'
C4 50.00'
C5 25.00'
C6 25.00'
C7 25.00'
C6 25.00'
C9 25.00'
Cl0 25.00'
Cll 51.00'
C12 51.00'
C13 51.00'
C14 51.00'
C15 51.00'
C16 50.00'
C17 25.00'
C16 25.00'
C19 325.00'
C20 25.00'
C21 25.00'
C22 650.00'
C23 650.00'
C24 650.00'
C25 650.00'
C26 206.00'
C27 206.00'
C26 206.00'
C29 206.00'
C30 60.00'
C31 60.00'
C32 60.00'
C33 60.00'
C34 25.00'
C35 25.00'
C36 50.00'
C37 56.72'
C38 50.00'
C39 25.00'
C40 25.00'
C41 1532.50'
C42 25.00'
C43 25.00'
C44 156.00'
C45 600.00'
C46 600.00'
C47 25.00'
C48 275.00'
C49 275.00'
C50 25.00'
C51 345.00'
C52 345.00'
C53 1582.50'
C54 490.00'
C55 490.00'
C55 490.00'
C57 490.00'
The
WLB
Group
CURVE TABLE
LENGTH
39.27'
10.13'
52.91 '
25.37'
37.95'
1.32'
5.03'
34.24'
34.24'
5.03'
43.64'
30.S3'
40.42'
72.40'
27.20'
53.21'
4.23'
33.36'
172.94'
34.24'
7.21'
SO.05'
40.57'
SO.05'
50.56'
59.63'
46.57'
25.16'
9.85'
29.95'
5.88'
44.13'
36.05'
2.33'
36.94'
26.37'
50.00'
17.70'
39.27'
29.00'
62.35'
29.59'
10.19'
106.94'
19.55'
63.15'
41.45'
161.30'
3.53'
10.27'
105.51'
67.48'
28.76'
69.71'
80.09'
80.09'
80.09'
CHORD DI5T. DELTA No. RADIUS
535'00'00"E 35.35' 90'00'00" C58 490.00'
N66'23'25"E 10.05' 23"13'06" C59 490.00'
N75'29'57"W 51.01' 53'25'22" C60 490.00'
554'53'23"E 25.07' 30'13'14" C61 490.00'
N56'30'35"E 34.41' 65'56'46" C62 490.00'
Nll'30'35"E 1.32' 3'01'12" C63 51.00'
504'13'53"W 5.03' 11'32'13" C64 51.00'
540'45'07"E 31.62' 76'27'47" C6S 51.00'
N50'46'07"E 31.62' 76'27'47" C66 51.00'
N15'45'07"E 5.03' 11'32'13" C67 50.00'
534'30' 45"W 42.32' 49'01 '30" C6B 50.00'
576'20'36"W 30.36' 34'36'10" C69 440.00'
N63'37'5S"W 39.37' 45'24'42" C70 50.00'
NOO'15'20"W 66.46' Sl'20'35" C71 50.00'
N55'41' 49"E 26.S6' 30'33'42" C72 50.00'
540'29'20"W 50.74' 60'56'40" C73 50.00'
505'09'OS"W 4.23' 9'41'44" C74 50.00'
537"55'17"E 30.94' 76'27'06" C75 50.00'
N60'54'11"W 170.91' 30'29'16" C76 440.00'
564'53'25"E 31.62' 76'27'47" C77 440.00'
N47"36'55"E 7.19' 16'31'32" C78 440.00'
N3S'36'32"E SO. DO' 7"03'22" C79 500.00'
N43'55'30"E 40.56' 3'34'33" C80 475.00'
N49'14'27"E SO. DO' 7"03'22" C81 25.00'
N54'59'54"E 50.56' 4'27'30" C82 594.56'
N65'31 '1 O"E 59.42' 16'35'04" C83 594.56'
N60'17'16"E 46.47' 12'57'12" C84 594.56'
569'44'06"E 25.15' 6'59'57" C85 594.56'
584'51 '58"E 9.85' 2'44'23" CB6 50.00'
578'26'25"E 29.64' 28'35'54" C67 51.00'
561'19'59"E 5.88' 5'36'59" C68 51.00'
537"27'17"E 43.14' 42'08'24" C89 51.00'
500'49'36"W 35.51' 34'25'23" C90 51.00'
N07"19'45"E 2.33' 5'20'29" C91 544.6S'
N37"40'15"W 33.67' 84'39'31" C92 544.6S'
584'53'31 "w 26.06' 30'12'58" C93 544.6S'
584'57'55"E 48.39' 50'30'04" C94 544.6S'
N69'51 '27"W 17.61' 20'17'07" C95 544.6S'
555'00'00"W 35.36' 90'00'00" C96 60.00'
543'13'59"W 27.40' 66'27'57" C97 60.00'
508'50'04"W 62.34' 2'19'52" C98 60.00'
526'14'29"E 27.89' 67"49'14" C99 525.00'
571'49'26"E 1 0.12' 23'20'40" ClOD 525.00'
N76'51 '56"E 1 04.86' 39'16'36" C101 650.00'
N56'17'37"E 19.55' 1'52'02" Cl02
N52'20' 42"E 63.12' 6'01'49" Cl03 630.00'
N01'50'08"E 36.86' 94'59'19" C104 630.00'
N62'27' 42"W 158.99' 33'36'21 " Cl05 630.00'
N79'37'56"W 3.53' 0'44'07" Cl06 630.00'
588'13'59"W 10.20' 23"32'03" Cl07 630.00'
N65'37' 40"W 105.10' 17"31'23" Cl0S 630.00'
N51'15' 45"W 67.38' 11'12'27" Cl09 630.00'
509'28' 45"W 28.76' 1"02'29" Cl10 630.00'
514'04' 32"W 69.65' 8'09'04" Cl11 630.00'
522'50'01 "w 80.00' 9'21'53" C112 345.00'
532'11' 54"W 80.00' 9'21'53" C113 500.00'
541'33'47"W 80.00' 9'21'53" Cl14 625.00'
DETAIL "A"
NEAR SIDE S. V. T
;°RAx lY.4Y
1r--~
~~ • . ~ s Il)~ ~~ LOT 1
~.,., v, r-.:
.."
"<I-
LENGTH CHORD DI5T
6009' 550'55'41"W 60.00'
60.09' 560'17' 34"W 60.00'
60.09' 569'39'28"W 80.00'
60.09' 579'01'21"W 80.00'
42.05' 585'09'49"W 42.04'
2.17' 569 '50'19"W 2.17'
49.30' N61'15'1O"W 47.40'
25.35' N19'19'23"W 25.09'
137.69' N72'15'27"E 99.52'
34.B8' N50'23'07"W 34.16'
16.33' N60'52'27"W 18.23'
79.56' 58Y26'32"W 79.45'
11.56' 571'3S'21"W 11.53'
46.19' 53S'32'54"W 44.57'
47.28' N39'10'17"E 45.54'
47.28' 566'3S'52"E 45.54'
46.19' NS6'01'30"W 44.57'
11.55' 560'53'04"W 11.53'
143.21' 544'55 '14"W 142.58'
117.56' 527"57'02"W 117.33'
79.01' 515'08' 39"W 7S.90'
97.94' N34'40'35"E 97.63'
53.78' N25'09'12"E 53.73'
26.00' N07"29'27"W 24.65'
55.54' 534'35'27"E 55.52'
60.33' 528'03'25"E 60.27'
60.17' 520'19'31"E SO.l l'
17.57' 515'35' 43"E 17.57'
49.72' N43'14'49"W 47.59'
21.99' 559'22'56"E 21.62'
125.74' 523'35'45"W 96.23'
38.13' N64'21'19"W 37.25'
32.35' N24'45'43"W 31.81'
37.58' 508'33'52"E 37.57'
10.23' 511'04'45"E 1 O. 23'
SO.76' 515'51'55"E 80.69'
SO.08' 524'19'30"E 80.01'
41.24' 530'42'21"E 41.23'
25.41' N34'39'12"W 25.22'
30.79' N07"49'13"W 30.46'
26.98' N19'45'52"E 26.75'
3.42' N22'49'01 "E 3.42'
64.11' N26'30'07"E 64.07'
57.64' N32'32'25"E 57.62'
NOT U5ED
S9.63' 514'04' 32"W 89.55'
102.97' 522'50'01 "w 1 02.86'
102.97' 532'11'54"W 1 02.86'
102.97' 541'33' 47"W 1 02.86'
102.97' 550'55'41 "w 1 02.86'
102.97' 560'17' 34"W 1 02.86'
102.97' 569'39'28"W 1 02.86'
102.97' 579'01'21"W 1 02.86'
54.07' 586'09'49"W 54.05'
67.48' N51'15'45"W 67.38'
67.14' N26'09'12"E 67.09'
156.44' N37"10'14"E 156.03'
. . ' .
. : ... , ...
....
". ' ..
. .
" .. ' .
-cd
' .. ". ,
~ -
LOT 2 .....
LOT 3
1" =40'
Engineering -Planning -Surveying
Landscape Architecture. Urban Design
Offices located in Tucson. Phoenix.
Flagstaff, AZ. and Las Vegas, NV.
4444 East Broad~ay
Tucson, Arizona (520) BB1-7480
'" .
..
.... , . ...
DELTA LINE
9'21'53" L1
9'21'53" L2
9'21'53" L3
9'21'53" L4
4'55'03" L5
2'25'56"
55'23'04"
26'28'31"
154'41'06"
39'58'15"
21'00'25"
1 0'21'37"
13"14' 45"
52'56'07"
54'10' 51"
54'10' 51"
52"56'07"
13"14' 45"
18'38'55"
15'19'2S"
10'17'18"
9'21 '1 0"
7"41'37"
59'35' 41"
5'21' 40"
7"44'23"
7"43'26"
1'42'06"
55'56'20"
24'42'01 "
141'15'28"
42"50'21 "
35'20'51 "
3'57'10"
1'04'36"
8'29'44"
8'25'27"
4'20'16"
24'15'37"
29'24'20"
25'45'51 "
0'22'25"
6"59'46"
5'04' 51"
8'09'04"
9'21'53"
9'21'53"
9'21'53"
9'21'53"
9'21'53"
9'21'53"
9'21'53"
4'55'03"
11'12'27"
7'41'37"
14'20'28"
'.
0' 40'
LINE TABLE
LENGTH
30.53'
11.03'
11.04'
25.75'
34.89'
BEARING
NSO'OO'OO"W
560'00'00"E
N80'00'00"W
N80'00'00"W
577"17'14"E
LOT 46
13,120 50 FT
0.30 AC
LOT 47
17.391 SQ FT
0.040 AC
s
80' 120'
..
.'
. .
.'
C. A. "B"
250.268 SQ. FT.
5.75 acres
~
''2>. """' ~ <$)
100 YEAR FLOOD LINE TABLE
LINE LENGTH BEARING
FL17 76.00 523"21'29"E
FL18 22.22 N66'3S'31 "E
FL19 84.00 523"21'29"E
FL20 4.43 566'38'31"W
FL21 47.43 546'51'47"E
FL22 19.79 502"51'27"E
FL23 22.83 541"53' 43"E
FL24 42.12 517"23'19"E
FL25 16.79 560'00'OO"E
FL26 25.04 542"13'51 "E
FL27 11 .1 5 536'39'32"E
FL28 32.48 521'13'56"E
FL29 30.93 520'46'55"E
FL30 16.57 531'00'34"E
FL31 62.68 52Tll'lS"E
100 YEAR FLOOD LINE~
(1'
FL32 9.16 516'26'06"E
LOT 51
11,200 SQ FT
0.26 AC
LOT 50
11,200 SQ FT
0.26 AC
LOT 49
12,147 50 FT
0.28 AC
LOT 52
11.283 50 FT
0.26 AC
LOT 53
11462 50 FT
0.26 AC
C.A.
DETAIL "B"
NEAR SIDE S. V. T
LOT 31
~ 1;;5
8
IfD" N49'28'51"E ~ 23.43' (SVT TIEf"\/'
S84'30'50"£ 24 34' / ~ . / 10
CORAx '" ~y
--------
· ......... ' .. ' .. '. · .. ' ' .... ' .. ... " .. ' . " .. : ". :".: : .. . . . ' ... .
:. ',! '. : : ... :
(".:"'.: ::).:::.:::'
. : : ' .. : : ',,: ' .. : ',,:
:".: .":' · . '.' . : .: : ". : .
, ... ,', .. . ......, : ") .:':':.:,;. : .~
'.: .. :' .. :: ...... :: ...
..... '.
: .. , ~ '! . ',"
.' ... .. . : j .. .
.. ......
EXPIRES 3/31/2015
IN COMPLIANCE WITH CERTIFICATION
SHOWN ON SHEET ONE
1 "=20'
REF: 0V1214-02
I
1>""
~ C:~:
~. n '. :: ...... :., ........ , .. . ... "'. . .. " .. , ..... . ... .,. .; :' .. :: ........ : ... ..
: ", ,.",: :". '" '" ...... '" .. ..
:" ': :: : :., ..... :: ..
..... ' .. : ',,: : ". ' .. : : ... ".:.! ' .. : : ... :
: ". : .":'
: .. : t·. : .
..... ' ...
.~ .. :::~::.::~.'~ ;
.. ... '.
:"': .: . . ...
DETAIL "c"
NEAR & FAR SIDE S. V.T
LOT 47
/
C.A. ''E''
I
I
1"=60'
EROSION HAZARD LINE TABLE
LINE LENGTH BEARING
EHL 1 10.32 555'23'14"E
EHL2 96.13 529 '12'13"W
EHU 122.S5 560'00'00"E
EHL4 27.00 523'00' 45"E
EHL5 62.72 566'38'31 "W
EHL6 84.00 523"21'29"E
EHL7 22.22 N66'3S'31 "E
EHL8 76.00 523"21 '29"E
OV1214-26
FINAL PLAT
MARACAY AT VISTOSO
BLOCK 4
LOTS 1 THRU 7J. AND COMMON AREAS -A-THRU -J-
EEING A RESUBDIVISIOO OF MARACAY HOMES AT VISTOSO.
BLOCKS 1 lHROUGH 5 AND cot.IAOO AREA -A-AS REC(R)ED IN
SEQ.' 20142480246. EEING A PORTIOO OF SECTIOO 26 TOYIoISHIP
11 SOUlH. RANGE 13 EAST. G I: S.R.M. TOYIoI OF ORO VALLEY.
PIMA COUNTY. ARIZOOA
SEPlEMBER 2014 SHEET 5 or 5
SEQ. #:
•• =It:::
• o
UJ
(/')
'" 3:
"0
<JJ o
f-I
I
U1
I
<t
I
'" u o
...J m
/'
<t
"'" u o
m
/'
"-LL
/'
'" " ~
~ o
"-
OJ o
I
~
:J
" o o
~ o >-
3-o
~
I
CJ
~ w z
/' o
Lf)
o
Lf)
00
z
Block 4 Final Plat
Conditions of Approval
Attachment 2
1. Revise the property line for Lot 23 so the lot does not encroach into the existing public sewer
easement.
2. Provide a signature line for the golf course property owners to abandon the 30’ ingress/egress
easement located near the northwest portion of the project, or abandon the easement by
separate instrument.
Town Council Regular Session Item # E.
Meeting Date:10/15/2014
Requested by: Paul Keesler
Submitted By:Aimee Ramsey, Development Infrastructure Services
Department:Development Infrastructure Services
Information
SUBJECT:
Resolution No. (R)14-55, authorizing and approving an Agreement for Service between the Town of Oro
Valley and the Pima Association of Governments for a Summer Youth Transportation Art program
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The Pima Association of Governments (PAG) manages the Transportation Art by Youth program, which
incorporates art into regional transportation projects. The maximum amount of funding is $25,000 per
PAG member jurisdiction. Jurisdictions can accrue funding each year for a maximum of three years or
$75,000 to undertake a larger project. In order to release funding to the Town, an Agreement of Service
contract is required between the Town and PAG.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
Every five years, the Town and the PAG renew the Agreement for Service contract for the ongoing
Transportation Art by Youth program. This five-year term is intended to reduce the application processing
that would be required if the contract was instead year-to-year. These projects, which utilize PAG
Highway User Revenue Funds, involve the design and construction of public art on Town right-of-ways by
local youth. Projects are administered by the Southern Arizona Arts and Cultural Alliance in coordination
with the Parks & Recreation Department and the Development & Infrastructure Services Department.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The Town shall assume responsibility for project costs from $25,000 up to $75,000 during design and
construction of an annual, biennial or triennial project. The Town shall be reimbursed by PAG upon
receipt of invoices detailing the project progress and expenditures. It is anticipated that a new project will
be developed and applied for in the upcoming fiscal year 2016 budget. All projects are subject to the
approval of Town Council.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to (approve / deny) Resolution No. (R)14-55, authorizing and approving an Agreement for
Service between the Town of Oro Valley and the Pima Association of Governments for a Summer Youth
Transportation Art program.
Attachments
(R)14-55 PAG Summer Youth Transportation Art Program
PAG Agreement
RESOLUTION NO. (R)14-55
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING AND
APPROVING AN AGREEMENT FOR SERVICE BETWEEN THE
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY AND THE PIMA ASSOCIATION OF
GOVERNMENTS FOR A SUMMER YOUTH TRANSPORTATION
ART PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the Pima Association of Governments ("PAG") has set aside Highway User
Revenue Funds for public transportation art projects as part of the youth transportation art
program; and
WHEREAS, the Town desires to have a summer youth transportation art program to
provide youths with training and experience in public art; and
WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the Town to enter into the Agreement with the
Pima Association of Governments in order to set forth the terms and conditions for
funding the youth transportation art program.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council of the Town
of Oro Valley, Arizona, that:
SECTION 1. The Agreement for Service between the Town of Oro Valley and the
Pima Association of Governments, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated
herein by this reference, for a summer youth transportation art program is hereby
authorized and approved.
SECTION 2.The Mayor and Council and any other administrative officials of the
Town of Oro Valley are hereby authorized to take such steps as are necessary to
execute and implement the terms of the Agreement.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley,
Arizona, on this 15th day of October, 2014.
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
Dr. Satish I. Hiremath, Mayor
ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie K. Bower, Town Clerk Tobin Sidles, Legal Services Director
Date: Date:
Page 1 of 7
PAG Contract:
AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC ART FUNDING
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into by and between _________________, a political
subdivision of the State of Arizona, hereinafter called “Jurisdiction,” and the Pima Association
of Governments, an Arizona non-profit corporation, hereinafter called "PAG.”
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Jurisdiction intends to administer a Summer Youth
Transportation Art Program to provide youth with employment, training and
experience in creating forms of public art; and
WHEREAS, PAG intends to contribute Highway User Revenue Funds to
Jurisdiction’s Summer Youth Transportation Art Program (the “Program”)
commencing with the summer of 2015 and continuing each calendar year
thereafter throughout the term of this AGREEMENT.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
TERM AND MAXIMUM AMOUNT:
The term of this AGREEMENT begins on the date of signature by the PAG Executive
Director and terminates on December 31, 2019, unless sooner terminated, or unless further
extended, pursuant to the provisions of Article V of this AGREEMENT. In the fall of each
calendar year, PAG will solicit participation in the Program by notifying all of the
participating jurisdictions of the amount of HURF funds available for the next calendar year.
Jurisdiction shall not undertake any PAG funded work on the Program until PAG issues a
Notice To Proceed (NTP) to Jurisdiction.
The Parties acknowledge that, upon completion and acceptance of the work undertaken
during each year of the Program, Jurisdiction may respond to PAG's solicitation by applying to
continue Program participation during the succeeding year in accordance with PAG's
Transportation Art By Youth Program Policies in effect at the time of application. Annual
preliminary approval and determination of eligibility of Jurisdiction’s proposed project(s)
submitted under this Program shall rest with PAG's Transportation Planning Committee
(TPC). Final approval of Jurisdiction’s proposed project(s) rests with the Arizona Department
of Transportation (ADOT). Upon final approval from ADOT, PAG will promptly issue a NTP.
Page 2 of 7
The maximum contribution to Jurisdiction by PAG under this AGREEMENT is limited
to $125,000.00.If the Jurisdiction has remaining funds from a previous PAG Program
contract, it may but need not incorporate the balance of such funds into this AGREEMENT.
ARTICLE II
PURPOSE AND WORK STATEMENT:
Jurisdiction will submit each project for approval each year to the PAG
Transportation Planning Committee.
ARTICLE III
Jurisdiction’s Duties:
Jurisdiction shall provide the following services:
Administer the project as approved by the Transportation Planning Committee each
year.
Recruit youth from economically disadvantaged areas.
Consult with elected officials and other interested parties in determining the precise
nature and location of the completed project.
Provide for review and approval of the completed project by the key stakeholders and
decision-makers.
Assume all responsibilities for the project, including cost and quality control
measures for design and construction, and ownership and maintenance of the final
project.
Submit a final report to PAG detailing the results of the program for the subject
calendar year.
Submit confirming, complete and accurate invoices for reimbursement of
expenditures incurred under this Program; such invoices shall be submitted to PAG
monthly. Final invoice to be submitted within ninety (90) calendar days upon
completion of the project. Invoices submitted later than ninety (90) days following
project completion will not be paid, unless PAG determines that extenuating
circumstances prevail.
Applications should include a budget breakdown that provides a separate line item for
youth stipends. Note: PAG targets a minimum of 20% for youth stipends.
Page 3 of 7
Final invoice should include a color photograph of the completed youth art project.
Each project should include a plaque on the completed Youth Art Project indicating
funding support contributed by Pima Association of Governments. (PAG will provide
plaques upon request.)
ARTICLE IV
PAYMENT:
A.Total payment for each year of this AGREEMENT shall be set by the PAG
Transportation Planning Committee. Jurisdiction may elect to augment funds
provided by PAG at the sole discretion of Jurisdiction.
B. PAG shall reimburse Jurisdiction within thirty (30) days of receipt of acceptable,
properly completed invoices detailing project progress and expenditures.
ARTICLE V
TERMINATION / EXTENSION FOR CONVENIENCE:
Either party may, at any time and without cause, cancel this AGREEMENT by serving
upon the other party thirty (30) days advance written notice of such intent to cancel. In the
event of such cancellation, PAG's only obligation to Jurisdiction shall be payment for services
rendered prior to cancellation. If mutually agreed by PAG and Jurisdiction, the term and
maximum amount of this AGREEMENT may be modified by written agreement signed by both
Parties
ARTICLE VI
CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
This AGREEMENT is subject to the provisions of A.R.S. 38-511 which provides as
follows: "The State, its political subdivisions or any department of either may, within three
years after its execution, cancel any contract, without penalty or further obligation, made by the
State, its political subdivisions, or any of the departments or agencies of either if any person
significantly involved in initiating, negotiating, securing, drafting or creating the contract on
behalf of the State, its political subdivisions or any of the departments or agencies of either is, at
any time, while the contract or any extension of the contract is in effect, an employee or agent
Page 4 of 7
of any other party to the contract in any capacity or a consultant to any other party to the
contract with respect to the subject matter of the contract."
ARTICLE VII
ASSIGNABILITY:
Jurisdiction shall not assign any interest in this AGREEMENT, and shall not transfer
any interest in the same without prior written consent of PAG thereto; provided, however, that
claims for money due or to become due to Jurisdiction from PAG under this AGREEMENT
may be assigned to a bank, trust company, or other financial institution without such approval.
Notice of any such assignment or transfer shall be furnished promptly to PAG.
ARTICLE VIII
OFFICIALS NOT TO BENEFIT:
No member of or delegates to the Congress of the United States of America, and no
resident commissioner, shall be admitted to any share or part of the AGREEMENT or to any
benefit to arise here from.
ARTICLE IX
NONDISCRIMINATION:
Affirmative Action Provisions: Jurisdiction agrees to abide by the PAG affirmative
action policies as stated in PAG Resolution # 84-4, dated November 21, 1984. These are
included in the Personnel Policies of the Pima Association of Governments as approved by
the PAG Regional Council on November 21, 1984, and as they may be amended. Both
parties agree to comply with Executive Order 2009-09 of the Governor of the State of
Arizona.
ARTICLE X
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT:
Jurisdiction shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Americans with
Disabilities Act (Public Law 101-336,42 D.S.C. 12101- 12213), and applicable Federal
regulations under this Act.
Page 5 of 7
ARTICLE XI
NON – WAIVER:
The failure of either party to insist in any one or more instances upon the full and
complete compliance with any of the terms and provisions of this AGREEMENT, to take any
action permitted as a result thereof, shall not be construed as a waiver or relinquishment of the
right to insist upon full and complete performance of the same or any other covenant or
condition either in the past or in the future.
ARTICLE XII
INDEMNIFICATION:
To the fullest extent permitted by law, each party (as “Indemnitor”) agrees to indemnify, defend
and hold harmless the other party, its officers, officials, employees, agents, volunteers,
successors, and assigns (as “Indemnitees”) from and against any and all claims, losses, liability,
costs or expenses (including reasonable attorney fees), hereinafter collectively referred to as
“claims,” arising out of bodily injury to any person (including death) or property damage, but
only to the extent that such claims which result in liability to the Indemnitees, are caused by the
act, omission, negligence, misconduct, or other fault of the Indemnitor, its officers, officials,
agents, employees, or volunteers, successor, or assigns, provided, however, that the Indemnitor
shall have no obligation to indemnify the Indemnitee for the Indemnitee's passive negligence.
ARTICLE XIII
SEVERABILITY:
Each provision of this AGREEMENT stands alone, and any provision of this
AGREEMENT found to be prohibited by law shall be ineffective to the extent of such
prohibition without invalidating the remainder of this AGREEMENT.
ARTICLE XIV
Funding for this AGREEMENT is being provided by the Arizona Department of
Transportation. PAG has no funds of its own to pay for the work being done under this
AGREEMENT, and therefore is not obligated to pay Jurisdiction until PAG receives funding
from the ADOT. Costs incurred by Jurisdiction as the result of any changes by PAG and/or by
Jurisdiction outside the general Scope of this AGREEMENT will not be allowed for
reimbursement under this AGREEMENT unless these changes and related costs have been
approved by PAG in writing prior to incurring the costs.
Page 6 of 7
ARTICLE XV
If Jurisdiction is self-insured as a governmental entity, the Parties acknowledge that
Jurisdiction’s program of self-insurance meets the following minimum requirements of this
AGREEMENT. Otherwise, Jurisdiction shall obtain insurance as described below and keep
such coverage in force throughout the life of the AGREEMENT. All policies must contain an
endorsement providing that written notice be given to PAG at least ten (10) calendar days
prior to termination or cancellation in coverage in any policy. Except for professional liability
insurance, the liability insurance policy(s) shall include PAG as an additional insured with
respect to liability arising out of the Contract. Jurisdiction must agree that the insurance will
be primary and that any insurance carried by PAG will be excess and non-contributing.
Coverage Afforded
Coverage Afforded Limits of Liability
Workers’ Compensation
Employees Liability
$100,000
Professional Liability
(Errors and Omissions)
$500,000
General Liability $1,000,000
ARTICLE XVI
ENTIRE AGREEMENT:
This AGREEMENT constitutes the entire AGREEMENT between the parties and shall not be
modified, altered, amended, or changed except by mutual consent as indicated by signatures of
the PAG Executive Director and authorized officials of Jurisdiction.
Page 7 of 7
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Contract as of the date signed
by the PAG Executive Director.
THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
__________________________Date:____________________
Dr. Satish I. Hiremath, Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________
Julie K. Bower, Town Clerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
___________________________
Greg Caton, Town Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________
Tobin Sidles, Legal Services Director
PIMA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
______________________________Date:____________________
Farhad Moghimi
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR,
and not personally.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________
Thomas Benavidez
PAG Legal Counsel
Date: _____________________
Town Council Regular Session Item # 1.
Meeting Date:10/15/2014
Requested by: Bayer Vella
Submitted By:Michael Spaeth, Development Infrastructure Services
Department:Development Infrastructure Services
Information
SUBJECT:
DISCUSSION & POSSIBLE DIRECTION: ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MODIFIED REVIEW
PROCESS
RECOMMENDATION:
No recommendation. This Council Communication is intended for informational purposes only.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The modified review process discussion was placed on the agenda at the request of Mayor Hiremath and
Councilmember Snider to discuss allowing administrative approval of minor changes to a Town
Council-approved Tentative Development Plan (TDP) that is subject to a modified review process.
The intent of the agenda item is for Town Council to discuss the modified review process and provide
direction on the merits of granting staff a degree of ability to approve minor changes to the TDP that do
not impact adjacent property owners, circulation, number of lots, etc.
The modified review process is a potential conservation incentive of the Environmentally Sensitive
Lands section of the Zoning Code. Considered by Town Council on a case-by-case basis, the approved
use of the modified review process allows a project to proceed to Final Design, provided there are no
deviations from the TDP. This is a much higher standard of conformance compared to a rezoning that
does not entail use of the modified review process.
Currently, the Zoning Code has language addressing proposed changes to a standard TDP (one not
subject to the modified review process) that allows insignificant changes to be approved administratively.
The existing, standard TDP change criteria are strict and could serve as defining criteria for approval of
minor changes to modified review process-enabled applications. In a recent case, minor deviations
required the TDP to be reconsidered by Town Council to approve minor lot configuration changes.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
It is challenging for final design proposals to conform in every aspect to the approved Tentative
Development Plan (TDP). A sufficient level of engineering detail must be provided on the TDP to avoid
future design changes. For applications granted use of the modified review process, any design changes
to an approved TDP requires reconsideration and approval by Town Council.
The recent rezoning for the Kai Naranja project demonstrates the applicant's challenge to not incur
any design changes following TDP approval. The applicant was granted use of the modified review
process in July 2014. Subsequently, the applicant submitted a design with minor lot layout changes to
accommodate changes in utility placement, but did not add lots or change the roads. The applicant's
accommodate changes in utility placement, but did not add lots or change the roads. The applicant's
request represented a change to the previously-approved TDP, which required Town Council
reconsideration and approval.
Revisions to Tentative Development Plan
The Zoning Code includes the following language addressing revisions to an approved TDP that is not
subject to the modified review process:
Any proposed changes to a Tentative Development Plan approved in conjunction with a rezoning shall
be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Administrator, who shall review the item and shall ascertain
whether or not the change is significant. If a change is determined to be significant, revised plans shall be
submitted for reconsideration by both the Planning and Zoning Commission and Town Council. A
significant change shall be determined by, but not be limited to, the following criteria:
Any change to the permitted use or uses. Permitted uses shall mean the primary and alternative
uses as set forth in the Tentative Development Plan and conditions attached to the approved
rezoning.
Any change to the development standards or zoning conditions relating to building heights,
setbacks, open space requirements, any reduction in open space, parking, floor area ratios and
density.
Any change to the Tentative Development Plan associated with this rezoning which would vary any
material terms or conditions of the rezoning, which would modify any proposed density standards,
any kinds of street or land improvements proposed affecting the standards and layout for vehicular
circulation, signs and nuisance controls intended for the development.
Nothing in this section shall be deemed to authorize the Planning and Zoning Administrator to
modify or approve any aspects of development reserved to the Conceptual Design Review Board
pursuant to Section 22.5.
This same Zoning Code section could be utilized as part of the modified review process to
allow administrative approval of minor changes.
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUGGESTED MOTION:
No suggested motion.
Town Council Regular Session Item # 2.
Meeting Date:10/15/2014
Requested by: Councilmember Hornat & Vice Mayor Waters
Submitted By:Julie Bower, Town Clerk's Office
Department:Town Clerk's Office
Information
SUBJECT:
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE OCTOBER 1, 2014, CONDITION OF APPROVAL OF
ORDINANCE NO. (O)14-13, SPECIFICALLY THE CONDITION THAT THERE BE SUBSTANTIAL
COMPLETION OF PARK AMENITIES BEFORE GRADING PERMITS SHALL BE ISSUED
RECOMMENDATION:
N/A
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Councilmember Hornat has requested that a condition of approval of Ordinance No. (O)14-13 be
returned to the Council agenda for reconsideration and Vice Mayor Waters has seconded his
request. Councilmember Hornat would like Council to reconsider the requirement that no grading permit
be issued until substantial completion of park amenities.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE for reconsideration of the October 1, 2014, condition of approval of Ordinance No. (O)14-13,
specifically that no grading permit be issued until substantial completion of park amenities and that the
item be placed on the November 5, 2014, Council meeting agenda.
Town Council Regular Session Item # 3.
Meeting Date:10/15/2014
Requested by: Mayor Hiremath Submitted By:Mike Standish, Town Clerk's Office
Department:Town Clerk's Office
Information
SUBJECT:
DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION TO INITIATE THE 60-DAY PUBLIC NOTICE PROCESS FOR A
FUTURE DISCUSSION REGARDING REVENUE OPTIONS
RECOMMENDATION:
N/A
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Mayor Hiremath requested that this item be placed on the agenda.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
Pursuant to A.R.S. 9-499.15, the Town must post a public notice on its website at least sixty days prior to
the date any proposed new or increased fee or tax is scheduled to be discussed and approved or
disapproved at a meeting of the Town Council.
The only issue to be discussed at tonight's meeting is whether or not to initiate the 60-day public notice
process to allow Council to have a future discussion about revenue options and what options will be
discussed. The statute does not allow discussion regarding the merits of the revenue options at tonight’s
meeting.
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to (initiate or not initiate) the 60-day public notice process to discuss ______________ (insert
revenue option(s)) at the regular Council meeting on _______________.