Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPackets - Council Packets (161)Council Meeting Regular Session October 1, 2014 1 2 Announcements Meetings are subject to change. Check the Town website for meeting status. October 7 at 6 p.m. Council Chambers Planning & Zoning Commission October 13 at 5 p.m. Council Chambers Historic Preservation Commission October 14 at 6 p.m. Council Chambers Conceptual Design Review Board October 13 at 6 p.m. Hopi Conference Room Water Utility Commission October 15 at 6 p.m. Council Chambers Town Council Regular Session 3 Town of Oro Valley 4 5 Maracay at Vistoso Block 1 Final Plat Town Council October 1, 2014 6 Town of Oro Valley 7 Town of Oro Valley Vicinity Map 8 Town of Oro Valley Block 1 Final Plat Set boundaries for 81 lots Match roadways to approved Site Plan design Match common area to approved Site Plan design 9 Discussion 10 Site Plan 11 12 Stone Canyon Clubhouse Conceptual Site Plan & Landscape Plan and Conceptual Architecture Town Council October 1, 2014 13 Town of Oro Valley Location Glover Road Naranja Drive Tortolita Mountain Circle Vistoso Highlands Dr. Rancho Vistoso Blvd. Hohokam Village Pl. Stone Canyon Golf Course 14 Town of Oro Valley Conceptual Site Plan New Clubhouse & Cart Storage Parking Area Service Yard Golf Course Slopes and Rock Outcrops 15 This is the conceptual site plan. Town of Oro Valley Conceptual Landscape Plan 16 This is the conceptual site plan. Town of Oro Valley Conceptual Architecture Front Elevation 17 This is the conceptual site plan. Town of Oro Valley Conceptual Architecture Building Elevations 18 This is the conceptual site plan. Town of Oro Valley Conceptual Architecture Colors & Materials 19 This is the conceptual site plan. Town of Oro Valley Recommendation With conditions, conforms with applicable design principles and standards Recommend approval subject to conditions Applicant’s Presentation 20 Town of Oro Valley Conditions of Approval: Conceptual Site Plan Planning Provide landscaped roundabout in center of new driveway Provide brick pavers or other decorative paving on the entry drive Engineering Provide a detention basin or other approved storm water management device Provide turn-around area at the southern end of new parking lot 21 Town of Oro Valley Conditions of Approval: Conceptual Architecture Lamp above main entry cannot exceed 9 feet to center of luminaire Submit a roof plan demonstrating that mechanical equipment will be screened from view 22 Town of Oro Valley Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development – Golf Course/Recreation Golf course and ancillary uses permitted Maximum Building Height: 48’ Existing Zoning 23 24 Zoning Code Amendment to Grading Provisions Town Council October 1, 2014 25 Application Introduction Existing Code Does not allow grading within 2 feet of a site boundary line. Purpose is to protect and prevent disturbance onto adjacent properties. 26 Grading Designs 27 Grading Designs 28 Applicability Internal Lot Boundaries Graded Subdivision 29 Summary & Recommendation Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval If approved, each request will be reviewed on a case by case basis to verify: Written consent provided Attractive grading design Easements and assurances provided when needed Conformance with GP Vision, Goals and Policies and with a (BELOW) GP Land Use Map With a proposed density of 2.6 du/ac (midpoint between the range of 2.1 – 5.0 designated for the site on the Land Use Map Consistent with the Zoning Code; Planning & Zoning Commission recommend approval, subject to conditions in Attachment 2 Which address the ESOS Deficiency Staff has had discussions with the applicant to ensure the conditions will be satisfied (Back Pocket). Discussion 31 Applicant’s Text 32 32 Staff’s Text 33 33 34 35 35 36 36 37 37 38 38 39 39 40 Zoning Code Amendment ESL Flexible Design Standards Town Council October 1, 2014 41 Application Introduction ESL Zoning Provisions Town of Oro Valley 42 Town of Oro Valley Mechanics of ESL 43 Town of Oro Valley Flexible Design Options Lot Size Setbacks Buffer yards Parking Building Height Open Space Mixed Use Modified Review Recreation Area Credit Native Plant Salvage Density Lot Width 44 Development Standards Town of Oro Valley 45 Review Criteria Town of Oro Valley Enables base zoning density for the entire site Compatible with adjacent land uses Does not conflict with an approved cultural resource treatment plan Statutes, development agreements, appeals processes and other provisions are not violated 46 Amendment Review General Plan Environmental preservation Integrate projects into natural environment Further incentivizes open space conservation 47 Summary & Recommendation Amendment in conformance with General Plan Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval Applicant presentation Conformance with GP Vision, Goals and Policies and with a (BELOW) GP Land Use Map With a proposed density of 2.6 du/ac (midpoint between the range of 2.1 – 5.0 designated for the site on the Land Use Map Consistent with the Zoning Code; Planning & Zoning Commission recommend approval, subject to conditions in Attachment 2 Which address the ESOS Deficiency Staff has had discussions with the applicant to ensure the conditions will be satisfied (Back Pocket). Applicant Text MINIMUM LOT WIDTH MAY BE MODIFIED SUBJECT TO THE MINIMUM LOT AREA CONFORMING TO THE MINIMUM AREA REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZONING CODE. Town of Oro Valley 49 Staff Modified Text MINIMUM LOT WIDTHS IN ALL R1, R-4, R-2 AND SDH-6 DISTRICTS MAY BE MODIFIED SUBECT TO CONSERVATION DESIGN REQUIREMENTS OF THIS SECTION. Town of Oro Valley 50 Review Criteria/Process Enables development to the base zoning density, at a minimum, for the entire site. Compatibility with adjacent land uses is achieved through architectural design, buffers, and placement of structures and improvements to reduce view impacts. The modification does not conflict with an approved treatment plan for cultural resources. Statutes, development agreements, appeal processes, or other provisions of this code are not violated. Town of Oro Valley 51 Town of Oro Valley Approval of Flexible Design Standards Rezoning: Town Council Discretion Setbacks Buffer yards Building Height Open Space Mixed Use Modified Review Recreation Area Credit Native Plant Salvage Lot Size Density Opt-in/Site Plan: Administrative Review Setbacks Buffer yards Building Height Open Space Native Plant Salvage Lot Size Density 52 53 Text Amendment Application | OV714-003 Town Council | 10.1.2014 Zoning Code Amendment 54 Text Amendment Overview Background for the Text Amendment Request Proposed text amendment (staff recommendation) to the Zoning Code ESL development incentives. Minimum Lot Width. Minimum lot widths in all R1, R-4, R-2 and SDH-6 districts may be modified subject to conservation design requirements of this section. Code Reference: Town of Oro Valley Zoning Code, Chapter 27: General Development Standards, Section 27.10 Environmentally Sensitive Lands, (F) ESOS Use and Conservation Development, (2) Development Balance and Incentives, (c) Flexible Development, (iii) Requirements Subject to Modification, Page 278.63 Provide an incentive for flexibility of dimensional characteristics of a residential lot. Lot width reduction request subject to the ESL review criteria. Retains the minimum lot size requirement per the zoning district. Provides an alternative planning tool in lieu of the minimum lot size development incentive. Allows lot areas to be reduced by 40% when in compliance with ESOS. Lot area reduction may be used in conjunction with the density development incentive. For certain projects, the lot size reduction development incentive is not the appropriate tool. Lot width development incentive provides a planning tool for standard lot areas. Will assist with public outreach to understand minimum lot sizes per traditional zoning standards. 55 Planning Example Planning Consideration Site Constraints Critical Resource Areas- Washes / Critical Habitat Hillside Significant Open Space Areas Planning Area Dimensional Constraints Standard R1-7 Study Proposed Lot Width Incentive Study CRA Open Space (Wash) Open Space 70x100 (Min 7,000SF) Lot CRA Open Space (Wash) Open Space 60x120 (Min 7,000SF) Lot Planning Study Highlights Preserves CRA & maintains lot yield Provides like or additional open space Balance planning flexibility / maximize open space CRA Conflict 56 Text Amendment Overview Proposed text amendment (staff recommendation) to the Zoning Code ESL development incentives. Minimum Lot Width. Minimum lot widths in all R1, R-4, R-2 and SDH-6 districts may be modified subject to conservation design requirements of this section. The proposed addition to the development incentives will provide Oro Valley with the tools to deliver comparable lot sizes as allowed in other jurisdictions. Comparable zoning criteria: R1-36 Type Zoning Oro Valley Min Lot Area: 36,000SF Min Lot Width: 120' Zoning: R1-36 Marana Min Lot Area: 36,000SF Min Lot Width: 100' Zoning: R-36 Pima County Min Lot Area: 36,000SF Min Lot Width: 100' Zoning: CR-1 Sahuarita Min Lot Area: 36,000SF Min Lot Width: 100' Zoning: R-1 R1-7 Type Zoning Oro Valley Min Lot Area: 7,000SF Min Lot Width: 70' Zoning: R1-7 Marana Min Lot Area: 7,000SF Min Lot Width: 60' Zoning: R-7 Pima County Min Lot Area: 8,000SF Min Lot Width: 60' Zoning: CR-3 Sahuarita Min Lot Area: 8,000SF Min Lot Width: 60' Zoning: R-3 57 Questions Thank you Stacey Weaks | Norris Design sweaks@norris-design.com | 520.622.9565 58 Miller Ranch Example Miller Ranch Planning Consideration Site Constraints Critical Resource Areas- Central Wash Planning Area Dimensional Constraints Miller Ranch Planning Area CRA Open Space (Wash) Open Space 60x120 Planning Study Highlights Preserves CRA Wash Area (95% Preservation) & maintains lot yield Provides required ESL Open Space Balance planning flexibility / maximize open space 59 60 Olson Property Rezoning Town Council October 1, 2014 61 Thank you Mayor, Council and public, I’m Matt Michels and I will be presenting the olson rezoning case tonight Request before you this evening is a Rezoning of a 39 acre property located on the north side of Moore Road. Applicant’s Request Rezoning Specific Development Standards Modified Review Process The applicant’s request has 3 elements, which I review with you here tonight: 1. rezone the property to Rancho Vistoso Medium Density 2. Adopt specific development standards for the project 3. request to utilize the modified review process, which is available as an Environmentally Sensitive Lands incentive This is their current proposed plan, which I will also review in a moment. 62 Town of Oro Valley Moore Road Rancho Vistoso Blvd. La Canada Dr. Location 63 Location and context: 39 acre property on North side of Moore Rd. approximately ½ mile east of La Canada Drive Surrounded by single family homes on west, east and south. Hohokam Park and future school site to north/northwest Point out Highlands Wash and rolling topography, including ridgeline Primary site constraints are the washes and wash and topography Major General Plan Amendment 2013 Approved for approximately 146 homes (based on 3.75 homes/acre) Neighborhood concerns – view impacts, lot sizes and traffic Review Criteria General Plan Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development Environmentally Sensitive Lands Background/Review Criteria Here’s a little more detail about the MGPA. The Council approved MGPA in December, 2013. Density limited to 3.75 homes/acre Neighborhood concerns included View Impacts, Lot Sizes and Traffic. Same issues were important on the zoning case. In terms of the review criteria used to evaluate the request: Conformance with General Plan Land Use, Vision Goals and Policies Conformance with Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development -Conformance with the Environmentally Sensitive Lands regulations 1. Rezoning Town of Oro Valley Moore Rd. R1-144 Moore Rd. MDR PAD PAD R1-20 R1-10 MHDR MDR School Park PAD MDR General Plan Zoning You will recall that last year the Council approved a Major General Plan Amendment to Medium Density Residential and Open Space. I’ll provide a little more detail on the next slide Surrounding properties are generally MDR, with OS, Park and School Zoning is currently R1-144 (3.3 acre minimum), proposed to rezone to Rancho Vistoso Medium Density Residential, consistent with the General Plan MDR designation and surrounding properties 65 2. Specific Development Standards The second element of the applicant’s request is minor modifications to the Rancho Vistoso Medium Density development standards I apologize for all this detail, but wanted to review the highlights with you The request was reviewed for conformance with the Rancho Vistoso Medium Density zoning category as shown on the screen The applicant has proposed some special development standards, related to minimum lot size (in actuality, lot sizes are larger) the front setback for side entry garages, and one story limitations, which I wlll talk about in greater detail here in a moment 2. Specific Development Standards Another issue related to including the property in the Rancho Vistoso PAD is that the project will be using Hohokam Park for recreation, which is owned and maintained by the Rancho Vistoso Community Association. As part of their agreement to incorporate into Rancho Vistoso, the applicant will be making a contribution to the Association to fund improvements to the park. 3. Modified Review Process Site Plans in conformance with approved Tentative Development Plan may be administratively approved. Town of Oro Valley The third element of the applicant’s request is to utilize the modified review process, which is enabled by the Environmentally Sensitive Lands Ordinance. If Council approves, the Site Plan can be administratively approved if it is in conformance with all aspects of the Tentative Development Plan. 68 July 1, 2014 Planning & Zoning Commission Issues View impacts associated with grading Building height Traffic/Moore Road improvements Buffering Modified Review Process Town of Oro Valley As I mentioned, view impacts associated with grading is a very important issue As was building height Traffic/moore improvement issues Buffering of the project PZC was not satisfied that the grading and view issues had been adequately addressed to support use of the modified review process. Now I’d like to review what’s happened since the July 1 PZC hearing 69 Original and Revised Plans Original TDP: 105 homes Average Lot Size: 6,250 sq. ft. Density: 2.7 homes/acre Revised TDP: 75 homes Average Lot Size: 8,750 sq. ft Density: 1.9 homes/acre On the left is the original TDP, which was reviewed by the PZC on July 1. What’s changed since July 1… Looking at the original TDP, additional lots were restricted to one story to address view impact concerns (to 948 feet) As mentioned, the number of lots reduced by 30% (105 to 75); average lot size is 40% larger, and density is down to 1.9 homes/acre Submitted revised grading plan, which was reviewed by Town staff and demonstrated that ridgelines would be lowered by approximately 15 feet and Reduces visual impacts compared to the original plan The applicant will be showing graphics demonstrating how this is being achieved An additional neighborhood meeting was held on 9/22 to present the revised plan to the neighbors. Still some concerns regarding views, the open space buffer on the wets and traffic, but staff feels that the concerns raised by the neighbors and Commission, especially related to grading and view impacts of 1 and 2 story homes, have been substantially addressed 70 Summary Conforms to General Plan Mitigates view impacts Meets ESL requirements Modified Review Process Review findings GP, including land use map and applicable goals and policies QUALIFIES for Modified Review Process, although PZ did not support, applicant still wishes to utilize Based on these findings (summarize), the Commission recommended approval subject to conditions in Attachment 1. Recommendation Commission recommended approval subject to conditions: Rezoning Specific Development Standards Modified Review Process Applicant’s Presentation Remind Council that applicant still wishes to utilize Modified Review Process Conditions of Approval Planning One story restrictions  Dedicate easement for Highland Wash trail #326 to the Town   Construct shared use path to provide access to the Hohokam Park   Cultural Resource Survey and Inventory Report   Reconfigure lots to eliminate multiple rear yards abutting a side yard   Condition added to address the ESOS deficiency New An amended TDP in conformance with the ESL Open Space requirements will be required prior to Conceptual Site Plan submittal. Conditions of Approval Engineering Dedicate 50’ of additional right-of-way along Moore Road Widen Moore Road to four lanes including curbs, raised medians, a multi-use lane, and sidewalk to match the existing roadway section on both sides of the project Condition added to address the ESOS deficiency New An amended TDP in conformance with the ESL Open Space requirements will be required prior to Conceptual Site Plan submittal. Town of Oro Valley View Impacts 772’ 75 Applicant performed a massing study from vantage points around the property. The primary view corridors are from the west looking across the site toward the Catalina Mountains Most impacted area is along western edge. View Impacts Topographic Conditions Elevation Differences Buffers Site Inspection Site Photos Massing Study Site Cross Sections Town of Oro Valley View Impacts were a primary concern expressed by the neighborhood during the MGPA case last year and the neighborhood meeting held this year. In assessing the impact on primary view corridors of the surrounding area, staff looked at a combination of resources to determine the areas with the most view impact: Topographic Conditions both on and off site Elevation Differences between the proposed development and the surrounding area Buffers proposed on the periphery of the development Site Inspection Site photos taken from different vantage points around the property Massing Study Site Cross Sections (the applicant can review the site photos, massing study and site cross sections if desired by the Commission) I will go over key points in staff’s review of the proposal relative to view impacts. 76 Environmentally Sensitive Lands Modified Review Process Incentive Section 27.10.F.2.c.iii.h) Modified Review Process: Site Plans and preliminary plats submitted in conformance with the approved Tentative Development Plan, as determined by the Planning and Zoning Administrator, may be administratively approved. Town of Oro Valley The applicant has met Environmentally Sensitive lands regulations which qualifies them to ask for the Modified Review Process Incentive I covered in the previous case. 77 Town of Oro Valley Adjacent Density 78 Adjacent density N RV N10 Parcels O/P; 3.9 du/ac Sunset Ridge 2 to E/NE-3.9 du/ac; 48 ac. 98 lots 15.74 ac OS (9-10K lots) Sunset Ridge Estates to E 1.2 du/ac; (lower density due to 5.56 ac. of common area (of 8.79 ac. total)) 10 lots (10k lots) Vistoso Pointe to SE; .7 du/ac; 32 lots on 48 acres; 16 ac OS (42k lots) Vistoso Ridge to S; 2.2 du/ac; 87 lots on 40 ac; R1-7, R1-10, R1-20 zoning Vistoso Estates to SW; 1.3 du/ac; 35 lots on 26.4 ac.; 4 ac. common area; R1-10, R1-20 zoning RV N10 Par Q/R to W; 212 lots on 48 acres; 10 ac. common area (5-6k lots) Town of Oro Valley Rezoning Process - the next steps of the process is…. 79 Recreational Area & Shared Use Path Town of Oro Valley Highland Wash Park School Rancho Vistoso provides community recreational areas throughout the master planned area. Immediately north of the property is the Hohokam Park. The applicant and Vistoso Community Association have reached an agreement for the applicant to fund additional improvements to this existing park To provide access to the park and the Highlands Wash, a condition has been added requiring a shared use path from the development (shown in red) to connect with the existing trail shown in green. The existing trail is graded, compact and rock lined and meanders past the park and connects to Highland Wash at the top of the image. The Highland Wash trail is essentially the sandy bottom of the wash area. The shared use path will provide connectivity to the trail system in the area 80 Trails TRAIL #326 This illustrative image shows the location of the shared use path connecting to the north Town of Oro Valley Environmentally Sensitive Lands Resource Management Area Tier 2 (25% Open Space) Critical Resource Area (95% Open Space) 82 Environmentally Sensitive Lands (ESL) Ordinance applies to property. Areas in blue indicate Critical Resource Areas (riparian areas), 95% OS requirement. Remainder of property is Resource Management Area Tier 1 (25% OS). This requirement has been met with provision of additional OS around perimeter, contiguous to CRAs. As the proposed development meets esl requirements, the applicant is able to request the Modified review Process outlined previously 83 OLSON PROPERTY RANCHO VISTOSO PAD AMENDMENT 10.1.14 84 REGIONAL VIEW 85 AERIAL IMAGE – OLSON PROPERTY 86 REGIONAL VIEW NEIGHBORHOOD 10 NEIGHBORHOOD 5 NEIGHBORHOOD 6 NEIGHBORHOOD 7 NEIGHBORHOOD 13 NEIGHBORHOOD 11 87 APPROVED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT MAP MDR 88 SITE MAP OLSON PROPERTY PAD AMENDMENT 89 ORIGINAL - PRELIMINARY CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN OLSON PROPERTY PAD AMENDMENT 90 UPDATED - PRELIMINARY CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN OLSON PROPERTY PAD AMENDMENT 91 OLSON PROPERTY PAD AMENDMENT PROJECT INFORMATION Project Proposal: Rancho Vistoso PAD Amendment to annex 39 acres of the Olson Property into the Rancho Vistoso PAD within neighborhood 10 subject to Medium Density Residential Development Standards. Project Acreage: 39 acres Ownership: Single local ownership for over 40 years Current Zoning: R1-144 (Single Family Residential District) General Plan Designation: Medium Density Residential Proposed # of Units: 75 Planning Commission: Recommendation (6-1 vote) 92 GRADE CUTS – CROSS SECTION 93 GRADE CUTS – CROSS SECTION A OLSON PROPERTY PAD AMENDMENT 94 GRADE CUTS – CROSS SECTION B OLSON PROPERTY PAD AMENDMENT 95 Neighborhood Interaction Meetings since 2013 March 13, 2014 On-site meeting with neighbor Letter to neighbors on west Phone calls with neighbors September 22, 2014 Ongoing discussions with RV HOA OLSON PROPERTY PAD AMENDMENT 96 OLSON PROPERTY PAD AMENDMENT QUESTIONS? 97 98 99 PHOTO POINT LOCATIONS MASSING STUDIES 100 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTO POINT - A 101 PROPOSED CONDITIONS PHOTO POINT - A 102 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTO POINT - B 103 PROPOSED CONDITIONS - 1 PHOTO POINT - B 104 PROPOSED CONDITIONS - 2 PHOTO POINT - B 105 PROPOSED CONDITIONS - 3 PHOTO POINT - B 106 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTO POINT - C 107 PROPOSED CONDITIONS PHOTO POINT - C 108 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTO POINT - D 109 PROPOSED CONDITIONS PHOTO POINT - D 110 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTO POINT - E 111 PROPOSED CONDITIONS PHOTO POINT - E 112 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTO POINT - F 113 PROPOSED CONDITIONS PHOTO POINT - F 114 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTO POINT - G 115 PROPOSED CONDITIONS PHOTO POINT - G 116 ZONING MAP ZONING MAP 117 PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT LAND USE MAP PAD AMENDMENT SITE PAD AMENDMENT SITE 118 119 Naranja Park Master Plan Update Status Report – Facility Program Mayor and Council Meeting October 1, 2014 120 Guiding Principles: Naranja Park Master Plan Update Address the needs of Oro Valley residents 121 Guiding Principles: Naranja Park Master Plan Update Address the needs of Oro Valley residents Identify Opportunities for “Sports and Event” tourism 122 Guiding Principles: Naranja Park Master Plan Update Address the needs of Oro Valley residents Identify Opportunities for “Sports and Event” tourism Prepare plan in the context of overall park system 123 Guiding Principles: Naranja Park Master Plan Update Address the needs of Oro Valley residents Identify Opportunities for “Sports and Event” tourism Prepare plan in the context of overall park system Prepare plan in the context of other community resources 124 Guiding Principles: Naranja Park Master Plan Update Address the needs of Oro Valley residents Identify Opportunities for “Sports and Event” tourism Prepare plan in the context of overall park system Prepare plan in the context of other community resources Prepare plan consistent with development standards 125 Master Planning Process: Naranja Park Master Plan Update Community Outreach Facility Program Development Site Design / Conceptual Master Plan 126 Community Outreach: Naranja Park Master Plan Update Telephone Survey Questionnaire distributed at Community Events Workshops with Stakeholders 127 Telephone Survey: Naranja Park Master Plan Update 306 Participants Fielded in June 2014 Oro Valley Residents, 18+ Randomly selected, one interview per household 128 Telephone Survey: Naranja Park Master Plan Update Sample highly representative of Oro Valley residents Gender / age distribution tracks with U.S. Census data Conducted to yield results statistically projectable to community as a whole 129 Telephone Survey: Naranja Park Master Plan Update Reached key demographics in Oro Valley Accurately represents views and opinions of residents Town can be confident utilizing survey results in its planning process 130 Community Questionnaire: Naranja Park Master Plan Update Distributed at: Public Open House Farmers Market 4th of July Celebration Put-me-in-Coach Youth Advisory Council By Community / User Organizations On Town Website 131 Stakeholder Workshops: Naranja Park Master Plan Update Included participation by: Organized Sports Leagues Cultural and Historical Groups Other Potential User Groups 132 Scope of Community Outreach: Naranja Park Master Plan Update More than 500 Oro Valley residents participated in survey, completed a questionnaire, or participated in a stakeholder workshop. 133 Telephone Survey Results: Naranja Park Master Plan Update 134 Analysis of Telephone Survey Results: Naranja Park Master Plan Update 135 Analysis of Telephone Survey Results: Naranja Park Master Plan Update 136 Analysis of Telephone Survey Results: Naranja Park Master Plan Update 137 Analysis of Telephone Survey Results: Naranja Park Master Plan Update 138 Analysis of Telephone Survey Results: Naranja Park Master Plan Update 139 Analysis of Telephone Survey Results: Naranja Park Master Plan Update 140 Community Questionnaire Results: Naranja Park Master Plan Update (#) = Telephone Survey Ranking 141 Analysis of Questionnaire Results: Naranja Park Master Plan Update (#) = Telephone Survey Ranking 142 Analysis of Questionnaire Results: Naranja Park Master Plan Update (#) = Telephone Survey Ranking 143 Multi-Sport Fields with Lights Facilities for Family and General Recreation Community Recreation Center Flexible Performance Space(s) Event Center Municipal Operations Facility Other Compatible Facilities Major Program Elements Naranja Park Master Plan Update 144 Recommended Facility Program: Naranja Park Master Plan Update 145 Recommended Facility Program: Naranja Park Master Plan Update 146 Recommended Facility Program: Naranja Park Master Plan Update 147 Next Steps: Naranja Park Master Plan Update Mayor & Council Approval of Draft Program Site Planning and Design Mayor, Council, and Public Review of Draft Master Plan Master Plan Finalization / Adoption 148 149