Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPackets - Council Packets (183)         AGENDA  ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION June 18, 2014 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CAÑADA DRIVE         REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 5:00 PM   CALL TO ORDER   ROLL CALL   EXECUTIVE SESSION - Pursuant to ARS 38-431.03(A)(7) regarding the purchase, sale or lease of real property   REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM   CALL TO ORDER   ROLL CALL   PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE   UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS   COUNCIL REPORTS      •   Spotlight on Youth   DEPARTMENT REPORTS   The Mayor and Council may consider and/or take action on the items listed below: ORDER OF BUSINESS: MAYOR WILL REVIEW THE ORDER OF THE MEETING   INFORMATIONAL ITEMS   1. Letter of Appreciation - Town Clerk's Office & IT Department   CALL TO AUDIENCE – At this time, any member of the public is allowed to address the Mayor and Town Council on any issue not listed on today’s agenda. Pursuant to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, individual Council Members may ask Town Staff to review the matter, ask that the matter be placed on a future agenda, or respond to criticism made by speakers. However, the Mayor and Council may not discuss or take legal action on matters raised during “Call to Audience.” In order to speak during “Call to Audience” please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card.   PRESENTATIONS   1. Proclamation & Presentation - Independents Week, Lisette DeMars, Southern Arizona Director of Local First Arizona   CONSENT AGENDA  (Consideration and/or possible action)   A. Minutes - June 4, 2014   B.Replat Rancho Vistoso, Neighborhoods 10 and 11   1. Resolution No. (R)14-35, authorizing and approving abandonment of a portion of the Pebble Creek Drive right-of-way   2. Block Plat for the Maracay at Vistoso subdivision in Rancho Vistoso, Neighborhoods 10 and 11, located at the northern terminus of La Canada Drive on both sides of the extension of Pebble Creek Drive   C. Approval of the Oro Valley Cultural Heritage Preservation Plan   D. Resolution No. (R)14-36, authorizing and approving an Operating Agreement between the Town of Oro Valley and Greater Oro Valley Arts Council D.B.A. Southern Arizona Arts and Cultural Alliance (SAACA)   REGULAR AGENDA   1. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE DIRECTION REGARDING EXPANSION OF THE ECONOMIC EXPANSION ZONE (EEZ) TO OTHER AREAS OF THE TOWN   2. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THE NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES (NLC) SERVICE LINE WARRANTY PROGRAM   FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS (The Council may bring forth general topics for future meeting agendas. Council may not discuss, deliberate or take any action on the topics presented pursuant to ARS 38-431.02H)   CALL TO AUDIENCE – At this time, any member of the public is allowed to address the Mayor and Town Council on any issue not listed on today’s agenda. Pursuant to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, individual Council Members may ask Town Staff to review the matter, ask that the matter be placed on a future agenda, or respond to criticism made by speakers. However, the Mayor and Council may not discuss or take legal action on matters raised during “Call to Audience.” In order to speak during “Call to Audience” please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card.   ADJOURNMENT   POSTED: 6/11/14 at 5:00 p.m. by ms When possible, a packet of agenda materials as listed above is available for public inspection at least 24 hours prior to the Council meeting in the office of the Town Clerk between the hours of 8:00 a.m. – 5:00p.m. The Town of Oro Valley complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If any person with a disability needs any type of accommodation, please notify the Town Clerk’s Office at least five days prior to the Council meeting at 229-4700. INSTRUCTIONS TO SPEAKERS Members of the public have the right to speak during any posted public hearing. However, those items not listed as a public hearing are for consideration and action by the Town Council during the course of their business meeting. Members of the public may be allowed to speak on these topics at the discretion of the Chair. If you wish to address the Town Council on any item(s) on this agenda, please complete a speaker card located on the Agenda table at the back of the room and give it to the Town Clerk. Please indicate on the speaker card which item number and topic you wish to speak on, or if you wish to speak during “Call to Audience”, please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. Please step forward to the podium when the Mayor announces the item(s) on the agenda which you are interested in addressing. 1. For the record, please state your name and whether or not you are a Town resident. 2. Speak only on the issue currently being discussed by Council. Please organize your speech, you will only be allowed to address the Council once regarding the topic being discussed. 3. Please limit your comments to 3 minutes. 4. During “Call to Audience” you may address the Council on any issue you wish. 5. Any member of the public speaking must speak in a courteous and respectful manner to those present. Thank you for your cooperation. Town Council Regular Session Item # 1. Meeting Date:06/18/2014   Submitted By:Julie Bower, Town Clerk's Office Information Subject Letter of Appreciation - Town Clerk's Office & IT Department Attachments Letter Bower, Julie From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Hi Michelle and Jason: Linda Ritter· _ _ Thu[sday, June 05, 2014 3:21 PM Stine, Michelle; Rivas, Jason Bower, Julie; Boyer, Chuck Thank you I want to thank you for both going above and beyond the call of duty to help ADOT have a successful Partnering meeting for the SR 77 Tangerine Road to Pinal County Line project yesterday. Michelle, despite the previous night's meeting, I know you went out of your way to set up the table and chairs for us the evening before, and I can't tell you how much that was appreciated! Thank you too for all the direction and help you gave us about accessing the room, sending the room diagram, etc. You could not have been more helpful. Jason, it was great to have you explain the equipment to me, download the PowerPoint and then make sure you were on hand to help me in the morning before the workshop and also be available at any time should I need your help. Oro Valley must be proud to have you on staff. You two are truly outstanding! Thank you, Linda Linda Ritter Partnerlng Facilitator 1221 S. Second Ave. Tucson, AZ 85641 Office: 520-388-4266 Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email tnmsrnisston and any attachments are intended tOI' use by the person{s)fentity{les) named above and fl10Y contoin confldentia!lprivileged intofTna1ion, Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. !f you are not HIe intended recipient, please contact ttle sender by email, and delete or destroy aU copies plus attachrnents. 1 Town Council Regular Session Item # 1. Meeting Date:06/18/2014   Proclamation - Independents Week Information Subject Proclamation & Presentation - Independents Week, Lisette DeMars, Southern Arizona Director of Local First Arizona Summary Attachments Proclamation {!}/Jro o/tIw~ffI( ®rn ~all~l!' !uhnna JrndzuttCtfinn INDEPENDENTS WEEK JUNE 29 -JULY 6,2014 WHEREAS, we celebrate the entrepreneurial spirit represented by our local independent businesses: and WHEREAS, locally-owned, independent businesses generate jobs in the Town; and WHEREAS, local, independent businesses help preserve the uniqueness of the community and give us a sense of place; and WHEREAS, Oro Valley's independently-owned businesses give back to the community in goods, services, time and talent; and WHEREAS, the health of Oro Valley's economy depends on our support of businesses owned by our friends and neighbors who enrich our shopping experiences with their knowledge and passion; and WHEREAS, Local First Arizona, a non-profit organization, has over 2,400 member businesses across Arizona who are celebrating many years of raising awareness about the importance of patronizing local businesses to foster strong community ties and preserve our unique character for generations to come. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Dr. Satish I. Hiremath, Mayor of the Town of Oro Valley , Arizona, do hereby proclaim June 29 th through July 6th , 2014 INDEPENDENTS WEEK in the Town of Oro Valley and encourage everyone to support the Town's locally-owned, independent businesses . Dated this 18 th day of June , 2014 ATIEST: Town Council Regular Session Item # A. Meeting Date:06/18/2014   Requested by: Julie Bower Submitted By:Mike Standish, Town Clerk's Office Department:Town Clerk's Office Information SUBJECT: Minutes - June 4, 2014 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: N/A BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: N/A SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to (approve, approve with the following changes) the June 4, 2014 minutes. Attachments 6/4/14 Draft Minutes 6/4/14 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 1 MINUTES ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION June 4, 2014 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hiremath called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT:Satish Hiremath, Mayor Lou Waters, Vice Mayor Brendan Burns, Councilmember Bill Garner, Councilmember Joe Hornat, Councilmember Mary Snider, Councilmember Mike Zinkin, Councilmember PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Hiremath led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Hornat attended the Davis-Monthan Tucson Valley conference last week and encouraged residents to visit www.missionstrongaz.org and voice their opinions regarding the Mission of Davis-Monthan. Councilmember Zinkin reported on the Service Line Warranty Program offered through the National League of Cities. UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS Economic Development Manager Amanda Jacobs announced the upcoming town meetings and events. Ms. Jacobs highlighted that the Town of Oro Valley would be hosting a 4th of July celebration at James D. Kreigh Park from 5 to 10 p.m. and encouraged the public to attend. DEPARTMENT REPORTS 6/4/14 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 2 Town Clerk Julie Bower announced that there was new artwork on display in the Council Chambers from artist George Terleckyj. ORDER OF BUSINESS Mayor Hiremath said that the agenda would stand as posted. CALL TO AUDIENCE Oro Valley resident Richard Tracy addressed comments previously made by certain Councilmembers. PRESENTATIONS 1.Presentation of Oro Valley Space Patch from Mark Kelly’s Flight by Congressman Ron Barber’s Tucson District Director, Maricela Solis Maricela Solis, Tucson District Director to Congressman Ron Barber, presented the Oro Valley space patch from Mark Kelly's Endeavour flight. CONSENT AGENDA A.Minutes - May 21, 2014 B.Fiscal Year 2013/14 Financial Update through April 2014 C.Resolution No. (R)14-33, authorizing and approving a Financial Participation Agreement between the Town of Oro Valley and the Greater Oro Valley Chamber of Commerce D.Resolution No. (R)14-34, to consider in whole or in part this item, repealing and replacing Personnel Policy 21, Non-Discrimination MOTION:A motion was made by Vice Mayor Waters and seconded by Councilmember Snider to approve Consent Agenda items (A)-(D). MOTION carried, 7-0. REGULAR AGENDA 1.DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE DIRECTION REGARDING PROCTER/LEIBER HOUSE RESTORATION AND POSSIBLE FINANCING OPTIONS Councilmember Zinkin gave an overview of previous renovations at Steam Pump Ranch and discussed potential future renovations and financing options. 6/4/14 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 3 The following individuals spoke in support of item #1. Oro Valley resident Bill Adler Oro Valley resident and Historic Preservation Commission Member Eric Thomae Oro Valley resident Paul Loomis MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Garner and seconded by Councilmember Snider to hold a Study Session with representatives from the Historic Preservation Commission, Oro Valley Historical Society and Pima County before the end of the year to discuss Steam Pump Ranch renovation opportunities. MOTION carried, 7-0. 2.DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING APPOINTMENT OF COUNCIL LIAISON TO THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Burns and seconded by Councilmember Snider to appoint Councilmember Zinkin as the Council Liaison to the Historic Preservation Commission. MOTION carried, 7-0. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Councilmember Zinkin requested a future agenda item for the June 18th regular meeting to discuss and take possible action on the Water Service Line Warranty Program offered through the National League of Cities and Towns, seconded by Councilmember Garner. CALL TO AUDIENCE No comments were received. ADJOURNMENT MOTION:A motion was made by Vice Mayor Waters and seconded by Councilmember Snider to adjourn the meeting at 7:28 p.m. MOTION carried, 7-0. Prepared by: ___________________________ Michael Standish, CMC Deputy Town Clerk 6/4/14 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 4 I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the regular session of the Town of Oro Valley Council of Oro Valley, Arizona held on the 4th day of June 2014. I further certify that the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present. Dated this ____ day of ____________________, 2014. ____________________________ Julie K. Bower, MMC Town Clerk Town Council Regular Session Item # B. 1. Meeting Date:06/18/2014   Requested by: David Laws Submitted By:David Laws, Development Infrastructure Services Department:Development Infrastructure Services Information SUBJECT: Resolution No. (R)14-35, authorizing and approving abandonment of a portion of the Pebble Creek Drive right-of-way RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Maracay 91 LLC has requested that a portion of Town-owned right-of-way along W. Pebble Creek Drive be abandoned so that it can be re-aligned to allow for construction of the proposed 342 lot Maracay at Vistoso subdivision.  This segment of right-of-way encompasses the uncompleted roadway link between the northern-most paved segment of La Canada Boulevard and the southern-most paved segment of W. Pebble Creek Drive, which is currently not open for use by the public.  BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: The right-of-way for La Canada Drive and Pebble Creek Drive, north of Moore Road, was dedicated to the Town by Vistoso Partners, LLC in 2003.  Only the portion of La Canada Drive between Moore Road and the Vistoso Golf Course was completely constructed.  The remaining segment, known as Pebble Creek Drive, was only partially completed with constructed underground utilities and an unpaved roadway prism.  Maracay's proposed design of their development is to abandon the existing right-of-way for the uncompleted portion of Pebble Creek Drive and re-align it with the new final plat for the area. FISCAL IMPACT: There is a minor positive impact because the Town will collect various permit and impact fees with development of the project. SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to (adopt or deny) Resolution No. (R)14-35, authorizing and approving abandonment of a portion of the W. Pebble Creek Drive right-of-way as described in the legal descriptions and exhibits in Attachment 2. Attachments (R)14-35 Pebble Creek Vacation of R.O.W. Map C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 6\@BCL@C4171110\@BCL@C4171110.doc Town of Oro Valley Attorney’s Office/ca/040711 RESOLUTION NO. (R)14-35 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA,AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING VACATING OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY ON PEBBLE CREEK DRIVE WHEREAS, pursuant to A.R.S. § 9-276, the Town is authorized to lay out, maintain, control and manage public roads within its jurisdictional boundaries; and WHEREAS, pursuant to A.R.S. § 28-7205, the Town has the authority to vacate any roadway that belongs to the Town by Resolution; and WHEREAS, the Town desires to vacate the existing Pebble Creek Drive which lays to the east of Maspalomas Dr; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the Town to vacate the existing portion of Pebble Creek Drive east of Maspalomas Dr. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, that: SECTION 1. The Pebble Creek Drive, described in Exhibit “A” and attached hereto by this reference, is hereby vacated. SECTION 2. The vacated right-of-way of Pebble Creek Drive, described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, is hereby approved. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, this 18th day of June, 2014. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Dr. Satish I. Hiremath, Mayor ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM: Julie K. Bower, Town Clerk Tobin Sidles, Legal Services Director Date:Date: EXHIBIT “A” LOCATION MAP Vacation of La Canada Drive and Pebble Creek Drive R/W Attachment 1 Town Council Regular Session Item # B. 2. Meeting Date:06/18/2014   Requested by: Rosevelt Arellano Submitted By:Rosevelt Arellano Development Infrastructure Services Department:Development Infrastructure Services Information SUBJECT: Block Plat for the Maracay at Vistoso subdivision in Rancho Vistoso, Neighborhoods 10 and 11, located at the northern terminus of La Canada Drive on both sides of the extension of Pebble Creek Drive  RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval.   EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant requests approval of a Block Plat (Attachment 1) for the Maracay at Vistoso subdivision. The submitted Block Plat accomplishes the following: 1) Re-aligns La Canada Drive; 2) Divides the 130 acre parcel into one common area (recreation area) and five blocks for future residential development. The proposed residential blocks will contain 342 lots and six individual communities with private streets and pedestrian trails. The conceptual site design of both the common area and lots were previously approved by Town Council. This action does not impact the design of recreation areas or layout of home lots, etc. The Block Plat meets all pertinent Town requirements.    BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: The Block Plat requires Town Council approval prior to being officially recorded by Pima County.    In September 2013, Town Council approved the Conceptual Site Plan for the proposed development. The Block Plat does not affect the design components (i.e. site layout, access, pedestrian connectivity, recreational areas, etc.) approved as part of the Conceptual Site Plan. The sole purpose of the plat is to re-align La Canada Drive and divide the 130 acre parcel into one common area and five blocks ranging from 4 to 35 acres in size.     FISCAL IMPACT: N/A SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to APPROVE the Block Plat for the Maracay at Vistoso subdivision, located in Rancho Vistoso, Neighborhoods 10 and 11, finding that it meets Town requirements.   OR   I MOVE to DENY the Block Plat for the Maracay at Vistoso subdivision, located in Rancho Vistoso, Neighborhoods 10 and 11, finding that ___________________. Attachments Attachment 1 Block Plat GENEBAL NOTES 1. 2. 3. 4. GROSS AREA Of BLOCK PLAT IS 5,642,703 S.f (129.54 ACRES) TOTAL NUMBER Of BLOCKS IS 5. TOTAL MILES OF NEW PUBLIC STREET IS 0.77 MILES. BLOCK 1 SIZE = 1,099,947 S.F. (25.25 ACRES) ZONING = MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (R.V. PAD.) BLOCK 2 SIZE; 764-,464-S.F. (17.55 ACRES) ZONING = MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAl (RV. PAD.) BLOCK 3 SIZE = 1,016,988 S.F. (23.35 ACRES) ZONING = MEDIUM HIGH AND MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAl (R.V. PAD.) BLOCK 4 SIZE = 1.4-96,332 S.F. (34-.35 ACRES) ZONING,. MEDIUM AND HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (R.V. PAD.) BLOCK 5 SIZE = 767,589 S.F. (17.62 ACRES) ZONING,. MEDIUM AND HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (R.V. PAD.) COMMON AREA "A" SIZE; 179.708 SJ. (4.13 ACRES) ZONING = MEDIUM HIGH AND MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (R.V. PAD.) 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. PROPOSED PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY· 317.915 S.F. (7.30 ACRES) MAXIMUM BUILOING HEIGHT FOR MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ZONED PARCELS IS TWO (2) STORIES OR THIRTY (30) FEET. MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT FOR HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ZONED PARCELS ARE THREE (3) STORIES OR THIRTY FOUR (34) FEEl NO FURTHER SUBDIVISION Of ANY LOT OR PARCEL SHOWN WILL BE DONE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL. BASIS OF BEARING IS THE NORTH LINE Of THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, G.S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA. SAID BEARING BEING: N 89'47'14" E. I ~>r'n()M 26 THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL BE SERVED BY ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY WHICH HAS BEEN DESIGNATED AS HAVING 22 23 AN ASSURED 100 YEAR WATER SUPPLY BY THE DIRECTOR Of WATER RESOURCES. _ --'I~ iJ.1iiEREIlY WARRANT THAT WE ARE ALL AND THE ONLY PARTIES HAVING ANY RECORD TITLE INmREST IN THE SHOWN ON THIS PLAT AND WE CONSENT TO THE SUBDIVISION OF SAID LAND IN THE MANNER SHOWN HEREON. UTILITY EASEMENTS AS SHOWN HEREON ARE GRANTED TO THE TOWN Of ORO VAlLEY AND PIMA COUNTY FOR THE PURPOSE Of INSTAlLATION. OPERATION, AND MAINTENANCE Of PUBLIC SEllERS. WE HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE PUBLIC ALL RIGHTS-OF-WAY AS SHOWN HEREON INCLUDING ALL STREETS AND EASEMENTS. RIGHTS-OF WAY AND EASEMENTS AS SHOWN HEREON ARE DEDICATED TO PUBLIC UTILITIES AND PIMA COUNTY FOR THE PURPOSE OF INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC UTILITIES AND PUBLIC SEllERS EXCLUSIVE EASEMENTS FOR TOVIN USES AS SHOVIN HEREON ARE HEREBY DEDICATED TO THE TOWN Of ORO VALLEY. WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, OUR SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, DO HEREBY SAVE THE TOWN Of ORO VALLEY, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, THEIR EMPLOYEES, OFfICERS ANa AGENTS HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES RELATED TO THE USE Of SAID LANDS. NOW AND IN THE FUTURE. BY REASON OF FLOODING, FLOWAGE, EROSION OR DANAGE CAUSED BY WATER, WHETHER SURFACE, FLOOD. OR RAINFAlL IT IS FURTHER UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED THAT NATURAL ORAINAGE SHALL NOT BE ALTERED, DISruRBED OR OBSTRUCTED WITHOUT APPROVAl OF THE ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL COMMON AREA "A" AS SHOWN HEREON, IS RESERVED FOR THE PRIVATE USE AND CONVENIENCE OF ALL OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION, THEIR GUESTS AND INVITEES. COMMON AREA 'A" IS SUBJECT TO AND SUBORDINATE TO THE RIGHT OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE UTILITY COIIIPANIES TO INSTAlL, MAINTAIN AND IMPROVE fACILITIES INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO. CABLE TELEVISION FACILITIES, STORM DRAIN SYSTEMS. WATER SYSTEMS, DRAINAGEWAYS, SEWERS. AND ABOVE GROUND ELECTRIC TRANSFORMERS AND PEDESTALS AND UNDERGORUND FACllTIES. NO OVERHEAD LINES SHALL BE USED. TITLE TO THE LAND OF ALL COMMON AREAS SHALL BE VESTED IN AN ASSOCIATION Of INDIVIDUAl LOT OI'!l>4ERS AS ESTABLISHED BY COVENANTS, CONDmONS AND RESTRICTIONS RECORDED IN SEQUENCE NO. IN THE OFFICE OF THE PIMA COUNTY RECORDER. EACH AND EVERY LOT OVINER WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHALL BE A MEMBER OF THE ASSOCIATION, WHICH WILL ACCEPT ALL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CONTROL, MAINTENANCE, SAFETY AND LIABILITY OF ALL COMMON AREAS WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION AS SHOWN HEREON. MARACAY 91 LLC, AN ARIZONA LIMlTED LIABILITY COMPANY B~ ________________________________________________________ _ NOTARY STATE OF ARIZONA) )SS COUNTY OF PI MA ) ON THIS THE DAY OF , 2014, BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED OFFICER, PERSONAllY APPEARED , WHO ACKNOWlEDGED HIMSELF (HERSELF) TO BE THE OF MARACAY 91 LlC. AN ARIZONA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY BEING AUTHORIZED TO DO SO, EXECUTED THE FOREGOING INSlRUMENT FOR THE PURPOSE THEREIN CONTAINED, BY SIGNING AS _________ _ NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: 'WATER ADEQUACY RECORDING DATA STATE OF ARIZONA) NO: )SS FEE: COUNTY OF PIMA) 27 26 V I SECTI ON CORNER FND GLO BRASS CAP ""I" - THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY HAS BEEN DESIGNATED BY THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT WATER RESOURCES AS HAVING AN ASSURED WATER SUPPLY, PURSUANT TO ARS H5-576 AND HERBY CERTIFIES IN WRITING TO SUPPLY WATER TO THIS SUBDIVISION. THIS INSTRUMENT WAS FILED FOR RECORD AT THE REQUEST OF THE BY: 7.W::7A-;;:TER:;;-;U;:;:;TI;;CLI;:;:TY~DI;;:;R;::;EC;:;:TOR;;;:;--- The WLB Group [lATE: WLB GROUP, INC., ON THIS DAY OF ----;;;;;:::;:=c--~ 20~ AT M. IN SEQ. NO. , THEREOF. F. ANN RODRIGUEZ, PIMA COUNTY RECORDER BY: ;:;;DE:;;PO;:UTY;:;-;-;:F~OR~PI~M~A'"';C:;;:;OU:;';'N;:;:;TY:;-;:;;RE;;;C:;;:;OR;;;;D:;:;ER:;--- Engineering • Planning • Surveying l.andscape Architecture' Urban Design Offices located in Tucson, Phoenix. Flcgstaff. AZ. and Los Vegos, NV. 4444 East Broadway Tucson, Arizona (520) 881-7480 1/2" IP RLS - BLOCK 1 L.oJ Z ::l 5 ~ I '" -::E I I I -t- BLOCK 3 ------ L.l07.39' 1 O' 300' 600' PROJECT OYERYIEJr :y.-,. : • ../ .... 1. \/iSTGSG I" ..... : :-'..1:';Lr L=167,42' R=150.00' , , SEQ. #: 13 18 19 1"'----'---'-:!;jC:30 BLOCK 5 ~~._+-_ _ A 23 24_ ;.;.~~~ -y -26 25 I BLOCK 4 1 3" z 1 MILE SHEET 2 ASSURANCES LOCATION l!IAP A PORTION Of SECTIONS 23 & 26 ms, Rl3E, G & S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VAlLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA -------ASSURANCES IN THE FORM OF FROM AS RECORDED IN SEQ NO. , HAS BEEN ::::PR""O;-;;VJ""DE;:;;O-:T::::O'"';GU::7A"'RANTEE SHEET 8 L=123.31' L=255.BD' R=150.00' SHEET 8 ORAINAGE AND S1REET IMPROVEMENTS (INClUDING MONUMENTS) AND UTILITY PEBBLe:: CHE,,~: DFli'vE IMPROVEMENTS (ELECTRIC, TElEPHONE, GAS, SEWER, WATER) IN THIS SUBDIVISION. n'''; ::'l' :(" l~""" :.,\ (, ;,J \) 1: '_:., i' 1,.iAi.i i r~L'T '! iY:r7~ i:)(' "l,"}''''':t I.' r". t • : ,., ... , 'I,j, 1 •• 1. .• I ' .. BY: 'M"AV.YOR:;O---;',TO""WN;;:;-;OF:;r;:OR;O:O;;-VVAAlLLI'iE'VY DATE: ASSURANCES IN THE FORM OF • FROM IN THE AMOUNT OF $ HAVE BEEN ':;;PR;-;;COV""I;;';DE::::D-::T:;::'O -;:;G~UA:-;:;R-;-;AN;:;:TE;:;::E THE RESEEDING OF THIS SUBDIVISION IN THE EVENT THE PROJECT IS ABANDONED. CERTIFlQATIOlf I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE BOUNDARY SURVEY SHOWN ON THIS PLAT WAS PERFORMED UNDER MY DIRECTION AND THAT ALL EXISTING AND/OR PROPOSED SURVEY MONUMENTS AND MARKERS SHOWN ARE CORRECTLY DESCRIBED. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED UNDER MY DIRI:CTION ----SHEET ",. BLOCK 2 900' APPROYALS ROBERT L. LARSON. R.L.S. NO. 26923 L6.,(;;END • o ~ FOUND 1/2" IRON PIN TAGGED RLS 12214 OR AS NOTED 1/2" IRON PIN TO BE SET AND TAGGED RLS 26923 FOUND SECTION MONUMENTATION, GLO MONUMENT PIMA COUNTY SURVEY MONUMENT (STD. DTL. 103) TO BE SET AT COMPLETION OF PAVING IMPROVEMENTS AND MARKED "RLS 26923" ---BOUNDARY UNE -- --SECTION LINE IP IRON PIN ----PROPOSED RIGHT-Of-WAY --PROPOSED CENTERLINE ----PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE - - - -EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY --EXISTING CENTERLINE .----EXISTING PROPERTY LINE ------EXISTING EASEMENT AS NOTED I , CLERK OF THE TOI'!I>4 OF ORO VALLEY, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS APPROVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN Of ORO VALLEY ON '!liE DAY OF , 20_. CLERK, TOWN or ORO VAllEY I5ATE PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPT. DATE TOWN £NGINEER I5ATE PLANI'lING MANAGER DATE WATER UnDTY I5lRECTOR DATE BLOCl(S 1 OYt2t4-02 BLOCK PLAT MARACAY HOMES AT YISTOSO , ,,'~' q THROUGH 5 AND COMMON AREA "A" BEING A PORTION OF SECTIONS 23 Be 26 TOWNSHIP 11 SOOTH. RANGE 13 EAST. G Be S.R.t.1. TOWN OF' ORO VALLEY. PIMA COUNTY. ARIZONA JANUARY 2014 DRAWN BY: COP 185050-M-Y04-0106 SHEET 1 OF 4 SEQ. #: -~ c o Cl -w ? o g '" "" ;;- z 22 23 27 26 L ... SECTI ON CORNER FND GLO BRASS CAP The WLB Group \ \ \ \ NBS.47.H" 17.95' .-,.----- GLO MONUMENT 1927 N 1/4 CORNER SECTION 26 1"=20' FND l/Z' IP RLS 12214 GLO MONUMENT 1927 N 1/4 CORNER SECTI ON 26 "" N35'OO'00"E FND 1/2" IP RLS 12214 FNO 1/2" IP RLS 12214 N35'OO'OO'E 65.29' BLOCK 5 767,589 SQ. FT. 17.62 ACRES BASIS OF BEARING FNa 1/2" IP RLS 12214 R=IS0.00' L=167.42' LF63'57'01" FND 1/2" IP RLS 12214 DRAINAGE, CONSTRUCTION SLOPE " ACCESS ESMT. JKT. 11064, PG. 1461 DRAINAGE EASEMENT DKT. 11064, FNO 1/2" IP PG. 1479 ~LS 12214 FNO 1/2' IP RLS 12214 .-N89'47'14'E 7#--'114 7;-;.4':;;t,j·,-:-:e:-::- 1'=20' I __ I --"---I. __ --FNO 1/2" IP /' RLS 12214 I S44'OO'00"E "-----. ,I \ 117.26 FND 1/2" IP \ RLS 12214 I I S30'OO'OO'E 76.21' SEQ. II: DRAINAGE EASEMENT OKl. 11064, PG. 1479 -t ----. --.--26.71' SECTION LINE· N89'47'14'E -----.. _-_.-! ! ! \ \ \ \ , , , \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ , , \ \ . \ \ · · • \ . \, FNO 1/2" IP RLS 12214 N02'OO'00"E 96.79' FND 1/2" IP RLS 12214 FNa 1/2" IP RLS 12214 577'00' OO"E 113.29' L:89Z.64' R:SZO.OO' TEMPORARY PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENT a=62'22'l7" SEO .. ____ _ TEMPORARY PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT SEO .. ____ _ FNa 1/2" IP FNO l/Z' IP RLS 12214 GOLF CLUB '!tV \.dS rG~3.:..; Dr(~·. "j ~)84 '1 PG,26~:}~J '''-''(l--.,.L.._ ,8 N16'35'52'E 89.69' RL5 12214 j / @.! / I qf{f \ FND 1/2" IP RLS 12214- R=75.00' L=82.3S' LF6204'52' FND 1/2" IP RLS 12214 J!5 I ::? 526'54'27'E "" , 23.99" 8 ~ I -I 577'00'00'£ 28.33' BLOCK 3 1,016,988 SQ. FT. 23.35 ACRES .......'" • If lit f S62'22'17"E a~ ~ 1 29.23' ! 11' ~I L=252.29' I LF17'37'43' R=8Z0.00' I r::: I,' ;,:; jf;... 1 [5/[5 ~ °1 0 p/ ;: ;:1, ~/' .II FND 1/2" IP RLS 12214 L=1033.Z3' R=74-0.00' LF80'OO'OO" PEBBLE CREEK DRIVE (PUBLIC ROAD) 80 R/W BY Sf TO BE ASlIN PEBBLE CREEK DRIVE PER.-4.1t INS~ON~D (PUBLIC ROAD) I, 1/ I.,I)M NT A PORTION OF DKT. 12109, PG.657 " " --- N90'OO'OO'E 69.60' N90'OO'OO'E 69.60' N90'OO'OO'E 69.60' PEBBLE CREEK DRIVE (PUBLIC ROAD) A PORTION OF OKT. 12109, PG.657 L-20S.48' R=745.00' LF15'48'11 " -- L-181.37' R: 705.00' LF14'44'Z4" L=184.98' R=665.00' LF15'56'14' S7515'36'E 34.97' DRAINAGE CONSTRUCTION SLOPE & ACCESS ESMT DKT. 11064, PG. 1464 L=234.80' R=660.00' LFZ0'2Z'59" BLOCK 4 1,496,091 SQ. FT. 34.35 ACRES MATCHLINE-SEE SHEET 3 : .. nglneering • Planning • Surveying Landscape Architecture· Urban Design Offices locoted in Tucson. Phoenix, Flagstaff. AZ. and Las Vegas, NV. 4444 Eost Broadway Tucson, Arizona (520) 881-7480 o· 100' 200' 300' ..... \ FND 1/2" IP RLS 12214 FND 1/2' IP RLS 12214 S33'49'04"W ) 40.00' , FND 1/2' IP RLS 12214 S34'OO'00'W 112.95' FNO 1/2" IP RLS 12214 S48'OO'OO'W 50.47' FND 1/2' IP RLS 12214 OY1214-02 BLOCK PLAT MARACAY HOMES AT YISTOSO \ \ BLOCKS 1 THROUGH 5 AND COMMON AREA • A" BEING A PORTION OF' SECTIONS 23 lie 26 TOWNSHIP 11 SOU.TH. RANGE 13 EAST. G lie S.R,M, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA \ JANUARY 201<1- DRAWN BY: COP 1B5050-M-Y04-0106 SHEET 2 OF 4 SEQ. II: -~ c o o ~ '" /' o -w ~ o "' o '" OC) :;::- Z P}i,RCEL f3 ~~~ G Nr.~iGHi3CF~HG{)D '~'~ .. .. / FND 1/2' IP RLS 12214 ....,i :z MATCHLINE-SEE SHEET 2 N10'OO'OO"E 580.09' Nl0'OO'OO"E 415.71' FNO 1/2" IP RLS 12214 L=705.54' R=21 00.00 8=19'14'59' I ."-'~I ~ N10'oo'OO"E ,2?::: I 580.09' ~ ~ !f N10'OO'OO"E ~/r II 415.71' ~! I L=225.08' I R= 2060. 00' I I 8=06'15'37" 1/ I jI FND 1/2" IP RLS 12214 580'OO'oo"E 144.50' BLOCK 4 1,496,091 SQ. FT . 34.35 ACRES FND 1/2' IP RLS 12214 L=579.80' R=2140.oo' 8=15'31'25" I I N68'37'54'E 22.82' FND 1/2" IP RlS 12214 FND 1/2' IP RLS 12214 R=200.oo' L=66.86' 8=19'09'19' TEMPORARY PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENT SEQ. I , TEMPORARY PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT SEQ. ____ _ L=466.53' R=990.00' 8=27'00'00" / / I / / / 40' I / PROPOSED 80' R/W ./ /1 / ~ ~~ / <XI ~i ~~ S\::j L=467.02' R=2060.00· 8= 12'59'22" L=44.13' R=60.00' 8=42'08'24" I ! FNO l/Z" IP RLS 12214 BLOCK 3 1,016,988 SQ. FT. 23.35 ACRES L=1233.84' R=990.W 8= 71'24'29" ! \ LE D I (PUBLIC ROAD) / / / A PORTION OF DKT. 12109, PG.557 / / \ L=225.86' R=150.00' 8=86'16'26" COMMON AREA 179,708 SQ. FT. 4.13 ACRES I, A" N15'00'OO'E 131.59' &>..,. ~ ~ / L=1576.52' 'Bt' ~ <£:, • .,.l / N09'14'59'W N09i4'59"W 41.18' , .. • ~~ 1> / ~~~'7c.-.-:::;;;C~mtj N19i541 E R=910.00 "'-f6> -i / 81.18' ~ 40.00' L=430.66' 8=99'15'41" ... .. ~ I-IBO.45·0.:...n:::--..... PEBBLE "CREEK ~RiVF: ___.FND 1/2" IP (PUBLIC ROAD)_____. RLS 12214 DKT. 12109, PG. 657 -___ .... " ~~~~~"12" ~~~;~~1" s8i4io,''/l 642'.132" ~~ CJI.f~ADA DBIVE-SZ8.2'3' --N18"'4'29"E ' ~ ./ /"" ;1(, /' /' ~!.-,LA. tn,,0I1C ~O"'D) ~.~ on' L R=950.oo ~ ./;;:"~. '6~ --'~ ,rVD~ 1-1130'45'0"£ ,-vt.·OV 40.00' L -........ ~ ~ L=62.34' SOMERSET CANYDN FND 1/2" IP --~R"'935.63' 8=21'33'58" .. " _______ ~~_-0. ,8' ~ R=54.5O' LGT,"j· .. ···j!,i') ?r·m DiRLCS-/t12"'21A14---...;:; ..... -. ---~ ~,-~ 1-180'45'01'£ 605. :;;. 8=65'32'33" l3r<.~){~:~A f~:~i·~;;E3~~G.OS$ N04*OO'OO"E I $ ~~ I ~ FND' 1/2' IP : 30' INGRESS/EGRESS ESMT. L=455.76' I. R=973.15 RLS 12214 : DKT. 12550, PG. 6491 8=26'50'00" / NOY30'OO"E / 104.53' / FND 1/2" IP / RLS 12214 BLOCK f 1,099,947 SQ. FT. 25.25 ACRES L=32.49' R=50.00' 8=3713'31' BLOCK 2 764,464 SQ. FT. 17.55 ACRES S0914'59"E 38.85' L=l1.86' R=50.00' 8=13'36'52' MATCHLINE-SEE SHEET 4 The WLB Group Engineering • Plonning • Surveying Landscape Architecture· Urban Des1gn Offices located in Tucson. Phoenix, Flagstaff, AZ. and Las Vegas, NV. 4444 East Broadway Tucson, Arizona (520) 881-7480 o· 100' 200' 300' FND 1/2" IP RLS 12214 r---__ ~R=~7~5.~00~'-_-~~-~ L=123.31' ...----------- 8=94'12'04' -----~ -FND 1/2" IP RLS 12214 SI6'OO'oo'W 77.98' FND 1/2' IP RLS 12214 FND 1/2' IP RLS 14145 R=150.00' L=255.80· 8=97'42'33' FND 1/2" IP RLS 12214 FND 1/2" IP RLS 12214 ~"-------.. -' p,o..ReEL G r-A .. J;,," ' ..... -, .. SEQ. II: FND 1/2' IP RLS 12214 \ii<;:'Tf"\{.7r'. ( ... t':i i:' t",,~t 1 ,:h:;'i;;' ~:,.~: ", ..... ,.! ":J'.,,~.: ,., ... , .... :,.~,:.~ / / / f / I !. / , .. M.'(" 's .......... ',',,','" .. :\:~.: .,t.., , •. :.,,""" ... : \ "() ,'.: ... : .... ::' ... " I j<,,".':" :. C./:-., ".J;,.~' OY1214-02 BLOCK PLAT MARACAY HOMES AT YISTOSO BUOCKS 1 THROUGH 5 AND COMMON AREA -A- BEING A PORTION OF SECTIONS 23 .t 26 TOWNSHIP 11 SOUlH, RANGE 13 EAST, G .t S.R,M. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA JANUARY 2014-SHEET 3 OF 4 DRAWN BY: COP 185050-M-Y04-0106 SEQ. II: ------- The WLB Group / , , , I \ , , / ! ; / \ S03'30'OO"W 540.47' FMO 1/2" IP RLS 12214 S12'59'31"W 37.46' S18'25'52"E 43.85' FND 1/2" IP RLS 12214 Engineering' Planning . Surveying Landscape Architecture· Urban Desigll Offices loco ted in Tucson. Phoenix, Flagstaff, AZ. and Las Vegos. NV. 4444 East Broadway Tucson, Arizona (520) 881-7480 FND 1/2" IP RLS 12214 0' FMO 1/2" IP RLS 14145 R=150.00' L=91.46' il=34'56'll" FND 1/2" IP RLS 14145 zoo' MATCHLINE-SEE SHEET 8 BLOCK 1 1,099,947 SQ. FT. 25.25 ACRES S51'OO'OO"W 143.68' FND 1/2" IP RLS 14145 R=150.00' L=107.39' il=41'Ol'14" FNO 1/2" IP RLS 14145 I 25' SEWER & PUBUC , Ul1UTY ESMT OKT. 11158, PG. 1 I \ \ \ I \ \ , \ \ I \ '( \ 1\ \,....., -- \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ FND 1/2" IP RLS 12214 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ :> 'V BLOCK 2 764,464 SQ. FT. 17,55 ACRES /' /' / ,. ,/ /' /' SEQ. #: FND 1/2" IP RLS 12214 FMD 1/2" IP RLS 12214 / I I : l'F!::-'; ..... HH i:-.f.:n '.,'.,' : ,,: , '" ',' .... \i ,,, I I r '. .. :," ""P~, ~~ / OVIZf4-0Z BLOCK PLAT ,J/ARACAY HOMES AT VISTOSO / / / Bl.OCKS 1 THROUGH 5 AND COhIt.lON AREA "A" BEING A PORTION OF' SECTI~S 23 It 26 TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH. RANGE 13 EAST. G It 5.R.M, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY. PIMA COUNTY. ARIZONA , JANUARY 2014 DRAWN BY; CDP 18S050-M-Y04-0106 SHEET 4 OF 4 SEQ. #: Town Council Regular Session Item # C. Meeting Date:06/18/2014   Requested by: Kristy Diaz-Trahan Submitted By:Kristy Diaz-Trahan, Parks and Recreation Department:Parks and Recreation Information SUBJECT: Approval of the Oro Valley Cultural Heritage Preservation Plan RECOMMENDATION: The Historic Preservation Commission recommends approval of the revised Oro Valley Cultural Heritage Preservation Plan.  EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) unanimously approved the revised "Oro Valley Cultural Heritage Preservation Plan" at the April 7, 2014, meeting. This Plan will provide a guide for the HPC in moving its work forward for developing and maintaining historic properties and programs. BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: The Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) develops an annual plan at the beginning of each year.  This year, the HPC focused on its Code (Article 6-10), specifically its list of twenty-four Powers and Duties that outlines its purpose and objectives (Attachment 1).  The HPC directed its attention to the first duty, “Maintain and periodically update, as needed, a plan for historic preservation.”   In 2011, the “Oro Valley Cultural Heritage Preservation Plan: Developing and Sustaining a Community Sense of Place” was developed but ultimately never adopted.  Consequently, the current HPC has worked for several months reviewing, rewriting, and editing this document to its current form.  This revised Plan was unanimously approved at the HPC meeting on April 7, 2014.   There are six components in the Plan that include suggested action items and are as follows:   1.      Public Participation and Heritage Education 2.      Historic Steam Pump Ranch 3.      Historic Neighborhoods 4.      Town History Records and Reports 5.      Undeveloped Areas of Town 6.      Honey Bee Village Archaeological Preserve   Overall, this Plan provides a guide for the HPC in moving its work forward for developing and maintaining historic properties and programs.   FISCAL IMPACT: N/A N/A SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to (approve or not approve) the revised Oro Valley Cultural Heritage Preservation Plan as submitted. Attachments Oro Valley Cultural Heritage Preservation Plan Oro Valley Cultural Heritage Preservation Plan:  Developing and Sustaining a Community Sense of Place                                              Revised 2014      Oro Valley Historic Preservation  Commission  Ellen Guyer, Chair Dean Strandskov, Vice Chair  Ed Hannon  Marilyn Lane  Eric Thomae  Connie Trail      Town of Oro Valley  Mayor Satish I. Hiremath, D.D.S   Vice Mayor Lou Waters  Council Member Brendan Burns   Council Member William Garner  Council Member Joe Hornat   Council Member Mary Snider  Council Member Mike Zinkin       Originally Prepared in 2011      Prepared by John C. Ravesloot, Ph.D., Scott O’Mack, M.A., and Patricia Spoerl, Ph.D.  Submitted by John C. Ravesloot, Ph.D. Principal Investigator  2011 Oro Valley Historic Preservation  Commission  Daniel Zwiener, Chair   Lois Nagy, Vice Chair  Barbara Campbell   Ellen Guyer  Ed Hannon  Sam McClung, Ph.D.   Valerie Pullara  Town of Oro Valley  Mayor Satish Hiremath   Vice Mayor Mary Snider  Council Member Bill Garner   Council Member Barry Gillaspie   Council Member Joe Hornat   Council Member Steve Solomon   Council Member Lou Waters       WSA Technical Report No. 2011‐18      TABLE OF CONTENTS    Introduction .......................................................................................................................................  1  A Guide for Implementation: Oro Valley Cultural Heritage Preservation Planning  ........................ 2   1. Public Participation and Heritage Education ............................................................................ 2  2. Historic Steam Pump Ranch .................................................................................................... 3  3. Historic Neighborhoods .......................................................................................................... 3  4.  Town History Records and Reports ....................................................................................... 4  5. Undeveloped Areas of the Town ....................................................................................................... 5  6. Honey Bee Village Archaeological Preserve .............................................................................. 5    Appendix A: The Legal Context for Historic Preservation ................................................................. 7  National Legislation, Guidance, and Support for Preservation Planning .................................... 7  State of Arizona Preservation Planning ....................................................................................... 8  Category 1, Toward Effective Management of Historic Resources .......................................... 9  Category 2, Toward an Informed and Supportive Constituency .............................................. 9  Local Preservation Planning ........................................................................................................ 10  Appendix B: Status of Oro Valley Cultural Resources and Tools for their Management ............... 12  Archaeological Inventories ............................................................................................................ 12  Residential Neighborhood Surveys ............................................................................................. 13  National Register Nominations .................................................................................................... 16  Protection of Historic Properties ................................................................................................. 17  Preservation Incentives ............................................................................................................... 17  Investment Tax Credit (ITC) Program ........................................................................................ 17  State Historic Property Tax Reclassification (SPT) for Owner‐Occupied Homes .................... 18  Appendix C: References for Oro Valley Cultural Heritage Preservation Planning........................... 19  Appendix D: Helpful Online Historic Preservation References ....................................................... 20          This page intentionally left blank  1 INTRODUCTION  Among the most important aspects of historic preservation today is ensuring that it is relevant  to a community and will attract visitors—to learn about special places of the past, and to  contribute to the overall economic sustainability of a community. Oro Valley holds unique  and authentic cultural resources that can make places of the past come alive. In collaboration  with partners, the Town can develop an exceptional cultural heritage program. This is a plan  for preserving the special historic places of Oro Valley, and for maintaining an awareness and  appreciation of its heritage within the community. This plan is a statement of the  community’s goals for its historic properties and programs, and provides guidance to reach  those goals.  This plan provides a guide for moving forward in developing and maintaining historic  properties and programs. Six components are identified, each of which contains suggested  action items. The components are: public participation and heritage education; Historic  Steam Pump Ranch; historic neighborhoods, Town history and records, undeveloped areas  of the Town, and Honey Bee Village Archaeological Preserve. This plan emphasizes the  importance of having preservation programs that are educational, operate at maximum  efficiency, and take advantage of diverse funding and volunteer opportunities.  A preservation plan is most effective when it is integrated with related local and regional  plans and policies. This plan is flexible in bringing together citizens, interest groups, and local  government to collaborate in preserving their shared heritage. The key to successful  implementation is having informed policy makers who integrate Oro Valley’s cultural  heritage in its social and economic development.              2 A GUIDE FOR IMPLEMENTATION:  ORO VALLEY CULTURAL HERITAGE PRESERVATION PLANNING  The context for implementing this cultural heritage program plan includes six major  components. It also incorporates the goals of the Arizona State Historic Preservation Plan  described in Appendix A. Residential neighborhood surveys and future preservation incentives  are included below because they apply directly to residents. As with all plans, this one should  be seen as a flexible document that can be updated as warranted based on  recommendations and involvement of the historic preservation commission, Town staff, Town  council, and citizens.  The six components are: public participation and heritage education; historic Steam Pump  Ranch; historic neighborhoods, Town history and records, undeveloped areas of the town,  and Honey Bee Village Archaeological Preserve. General responsibilities are identified below  as Town staff (includes the Parks & Recreation Department, Development and  Infrastructure Services, Communications Department, and the Town Manager’s staff),  Historic Preservation Commission (seven member volunteer advisory board), and volunteers  (individuals and organizations). These responsibilities may shift among staff and volunteers  depending upon a specific program or project and are intended here only to provide general  guidelines for implementation.  The Historic Preservation Commission should review this plan annually. Based on this  review, the Commission may make recommendations to Town  staff and will coordinate this  plan with the annual Historic Preservation Commission work plan. Town staff can review the  plan and the commission’s recommendations and provide a summary to the Town Council.  Many of the following components can be implemented in phases within the overall context  of the Town’s cultural heritage program. Most are designed to require minimal expenditure of  funds and maximum potential for partnerships.  1. Public Participation and Heritage Education    Ongoing preservation education among a wide variety of audiences is essential to a successful  historic preservation program and can be integrated and implemented, in most cases, with limited  funds, into the Town’s existing programs and facilities. Literature describing the Town’s cultural  resources should be designed and distributed to inform Oro Valley residents of the Town’s  inventory and to encourage public participation in preservation. Public outreach should be  considered as well and could include a lecture series, classroom curricula, special events and  submission of stories in various publications. On site tours of Steam Pump Ranch, Honey Bee Village  Archaeological Preserve, the Cañada Del Oro trail and historic neighborhoods should be made  available to the public. A special collections section of the Town’s historic documents, records and  reports, made available at the Pima County Public Library – Oro Valley Branch could also be  considered.    3 The Historic Preservation Commission should work diligently to establish and foster relationships  with the Oro Valley Historical Society, consultants, educators and other historic preservation  organizations throughout southern Arizona to implement strategies to increase public participation  and heritage education.  2. Historic Steam Pump Ranch  The historic Steam Pump Ranch is an important part of the Town’s heritage. It is  recognized nationally through a listing on the National Register of Historic Places; it is  recognized locally in that Pima County voters approved expenditure in 2004 of $5 million for its  acquisition for historic preservation and public use. Successful development of the Ranch is  dependent on the citizens of Oro Valley becoming aware of and supporting the vital role the  site can play in the community with an emphasis on local involvement and public access.  The property provides an excellent locale for developing a “sense of place” for Oro Valley  and holds economic viability as an educational facility, special event venue and heritage park.  Partnerships will be a key element in maintenance of the property and providing public access.  Documents pertaining to preservation and maintenance of the property include the  Intergovernmental Agreement between Pima County and the Town of Oro Valley for  Implementation of the 2004 Bond Issue Project for the Steam Pump Ranch Acquisition  (2006), Steam Pump Ranch Master Plan (2007), and the Deed of Preservation Easement  between the Town of Oro Valley and Pima County (2008) (all in Appendix C).  Of primary concern in the future is the protection of the historic core (as noted in the Master  Plan) at the ranch.  Town staff will coordinate with the Historic Preservation Commission to  ensure that the integrity of the historic core is preserved at all times in accordance with state  and national guidelines. Town staff should review the Steam Pump Ranch Master Plan  periodically to ensure that it reflects current planning and should annually review the progress  made on carrying out the recommendations in the Master Plan and report to the Town Council  and the Historic Preservation Commission. Town staff will annually review the progress being  made on carrying out the recommendations of the Master Plan and report to the Town Council  and Historic Preservation Commission.    3. Historic Neighborhoods  The Town of Oro Valley was incorporated in 1974. The first subdivision was platted in 1930.  Construction of residential neighborhoods generally did not occur until the late 1950’s.   Nineteen subdivisions were platted before 1974. (Actual development is not always associated  with the plat date). Subdivisions that have reached or will be reaching the 50 year old threshold  for consideration as historically significant are identified in Rock Art, Ranch and Residence.  Individual buildings with possible historical significance are also noted. The Oro Valley Historic  Preservation Ordinance (Article 6‐10) outlines the process for local landmarks and  neighborhood district designations.  4 A. The Historic Preservation Commission will concentrate some of its’ educational outreach on the  Town’s historic neighborhoods. These neighborhoods include, but are not limited to, Oro Valley  estates, Suffolk Hills, Campo Bello, and Shadow Mountain Estates.     B. The Historic Preservation Commission and Town staff will participate in outreach to highlight  historic districts, neighborhood and individual properties and explain the process/benefits of  designation. The Commission and Town, including the Planning and Zoning department, will  encourage Oro Valley residents to contact them regarding properties they may own or have  knowledge of that need to be preserved.   C.  The Historic Preservation Commission (and other interested community members) will pursue  inventory of neighborhood historic districts/structures as identified in Rock Art, Ranch and Residence.  “Windshield surveys” could be a first step in identifying such districts/structures.  D. Town staff, the Historic Preservation Commission, volunteers and consultants (as appropriate)  should consider developing tours of historic neighborhoods/areas of the Town to focus attention on  community heritage. An example would be walking tours of James D. Kriegh Park, Canyon Del Oro  High School or Catalina Shadows development and their role in establishing the Town of Oro Valley.  E. The Town will consider financial incentives related to historic preservation, heritage tourism and  education as part of the annual budget process.       4. Town History Records and Reports  A Town’s archives contain primary source documents that have accumulated over the course of  time and are kept to show the function of the town. Archives are records that have been naturally  and necessarily generated as a product of regular legal, commercial, administrative or social  activities. Archives provide a basis for the proper understanding of the past that is important to  inform as the town develops. Archives are a special resource for dealing with the social memory of  the town.    Town Historian Marjorie Kriegh maintained records of the Town’s incorporation in 1974 through  1977. These records reflect the fight for annexation and Oro Valley’s ultimate success. The Oro  Valley Historic Preservation Commission encourages development and maintenance of a record  archive. All documented history is now being housed at Town facilities. A centralized archive for  cultural resources reports and maps acquired from individual development projects that are  currently scattered in specific project files should be created. Due to sensitive site information, this  archive may only be made available for public use only on a case‐by case basis. The Historic  Preservation Commission with the assistance of Town staff should prepare an annual report on  accomplishments for the prior year to be included in the archive. This report should also serve as  the required annual report to the Arizona State Historic Preservation Office to maintain certified  local government status. As part of the archive maintenance process, the Historic Preservation  Commission should update the Town’s inventory on a yearly basis.     5 The Environmentally Sensitive Lands Ordinance states that the Historic Preservation Commission  shall maintain a list of known significant cultural resources for consideration in planning of current  and future development. The Town was to develop this list, based on the Cultural Resources  Inventory, in 2012. The Historic Preservation Commission, as part of the centralized archive, must  ensure that the list was developed and is being maintained.    5. Undeveloped Areas of the Town    The Town’s Environmentally Sensitive Lands Ordinance applies to cultural resources in  undeveloped areas and to all developments that require a rezoning, preliminary plat,  development plan or amendment to these items.  It provides for the conservation of significant  cultural resources in concert with other sensitive resources.  Some areas available for  development contain known archaeological sites as identified in Rock Art, Ranch and Residence.   The ordinance provides a sound basis for identification, evaluation, and treatment of known  sites as well as ones that may be discovered in the future.  Using the standard cultural review  process, Town of Oro Valley staff should review existing cultural resources data compiled in the  Phase 1 Cultural Resources Inventory report to provide a preliminary knowledge base when  future developments are proposed stipulations.  The Town will review cultural resources  information obtained during the process of future site development within Town boundaries to  determine the potential for public interpretation and education.  The Town will also consider the  value of prehistoric and historic resources in potential annexations. The Historic Preservation  Commission may review cultural resources reports and may provide information and  recommendations to Town staff.  6. Honey Bee Village Archaeological Preserve  The 13‐acre Honey Bee Village Archeological preserve was donated to Pima County in 2008  with the intent it be transferred to the Town when an agreement on management is reached.  At publication Pima County was the owner of this property. The Preserve is part of the 2004  Pima County Bond. The main area of this Hohokam site is to be preserved for public use. The  Tohono O’odham Nation and Oro Valley funded construction of a protective wall around the  Preserve. The area remains inaccessible and unused for walking, education and observation of  past cultural traditions.  A. In cooperation with Pima County, the Town will maintain a regular program of inspection of  the Preserve by Arizona Site Stewards.   B. The Historic Preservation Commission will monitor ongoing developments at Honey Bee  Village Archeological Preserve.  C. Future actions at the Preserve will include ongoing clean‐up of the site by the appropriate  responsible entities.  Linking tourism and preservation can do more for local economies and for tourism and  6 preservation than promote them separately. Heritage tourism saves and preserves your  heritage, share it with visitors and reap the economic benefits.  As noted in the introduction, Oro Valley holds unique and authentic cultural resources that  can make places of the past come alive. This Guide for Implementation sets the stage to  making Oro Valley’s history “come alive”.          7 APPENDIX A: THE LEGAL CONTEXT FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION  National Legislation, Guidance, and Support for Preservation Planning    The National Historic Preservation Act (Act) of 1966, as amended, is the basis of historic  preservation in the United States. The Act established the value of historic properties to  the public. Its major provisions apply at the local, state, tribal, and national levels and guide  historic preservation and cultural resources management today. The Act encouraged the  establishment of state historic preservation offices (SHPOs) in each state, and partnerships  among federal, tribal, state, and local governments. Today all 50 states have a state historic  preservation office that serves as the primary contact for local governments and through  which federal funding for state and local partnerships passes.  The Act established a Certified Local Government (CLG) program. The main purpose was  to provide a mechanism for local governments to carry out the purposes of the Act.  Certification is delegated to the SHPOs along with the responsibility for transferring federal  and state grant funds to local certified governments. The Town of Oro Valley (Town) was  granted CLG status by the Arizona SHPO and U.S. Department of Interior in May 2009. To  obtain, and retain, CLG status a local government must meet specific requirements including:  an ordinance to ensure that there is local legislation for the designation and protection of  historic properties; a qualified historic preservation commission; maintenance of a system  for the survey and inventory of historic properties in accordance with the Act; and  provisions for public participation in the local historic preservation program.  The Act established a consultation process (Section 106) whereby federal agencies, and  other entities using  federal funds,  must consult  with SHPOs  on the  potential impacts  to  historic properties and their significance before any federal undertaking. This process is  standard at all levels of government and is clearly articulated at the state and national levels.  It is described in various ways at the local level. In Oro Valley the process is acknowledged in  zoning codes and the recently passed Environmentally Sensitive Lands Ordinance.  The Act also created the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation. As an independent  federal agency, the Advisory Council deals with federal properties or those impacted by  federally funded projects. It also carries out the Preserve America initiative whereby local  communities can apply for funds for historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic  Places.  Perhaps the best‐known provision of the Act was the establishment of the National  Register of Historic Places as the official list of the nation’s historic districts, sites, buildings,  structures, and objects significant in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering,  and culture. The National Park Service administers National Register listings. In 2011,  almost  87,000 properties are listed on the National Register. Nominations can be made by  individuals, organizations, local governments, state governments, or the federal government.  The criteria of significance for National Register nominations (specified in the Act) are the basis  8 for determining the importance of historic properties at all levels of government and  management.  The State of Arizona adopted the National Register criteria for evaluating cultural resources  in Arizona, and the Town includes consideration of these criteria in the General Plan, the  Historic Preservation Ordinance, and the Environmentally Sensitive Lands Ordinance.  The criteria of significance are: A. association with historic events or activities; B.  association with an important person in history; C. distinctive design or physical character;  and D. potential to provide important information about prehistory or history. Significant  properties must also possess integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship,  feeling, and association as defined in the Act, and generally be at least 50 years old.  Determinations of significance are made by archaeologists, historians, historic architects, or  other preservation professionals depending upon the nature of the property being evaluated.  Determinations of historic significance do not necessarily dictate future treatment of  cultural resources and they are distinct from the decision‐making processes for treatment at  the local, state, and national levels. Determining a course of action regarding historic  properties frequently involves consideration of treatments ranging from preservation in place  (preferred) to the mitigation of adverse impacts.    State of Arizona Preservation Planning    The Arizona SHPO prepared a comprehensive preservation plan for the state in 1996. The  Plan was updated in 2000 and again in 2009 with the involvement of agencies, special interest  groups, and citizens (Appendix C). Participants in the planning process identified, and have  validated in updates, four principal needs to further the cause of preservation in Arizona:  ‐‐ A need to strengthen partnerships between government agencies, advocacy  groups, businesses, and the public.  ‐‐ A need for Arizona’s citizens to become more aware of the value of our history  and opportunities for historic preservation.  ‐‐ A need for appropriate information about Arizona’s historic resources to be  available to those making decisions about their future.  ‐‐ A need for the public to continue to be engaged on questions regarding the  identification, nomination, and protection of historic resources.  The initial plan identified eight goals for historic preservation in Arizona that have been  confirmed in the updates. The goals are grouped into two general categories: those related  to the identification and management of cultural resources, and those related to  preservation professionals, interested members of the public, and elected and appointed  officials involved in historic preservation decision‐making. The plan identifies objectives for  each goal: (1) the preservation community; (2) the SHPO; and, (3) citizens at large. These are  9 not repeated here but are an excellent reference as they relate to the action plan developed in  Appendix B.  The Arizona state goals are:  Category 1, Toward Effective Management of Historic Resources  Goal 1: Better Resource Management  Vision: Having a partnership of public and private programs that work together to  identify, evaluate, nominate, and treat historic properties in an interdisciplinary and  professional manner; and to use historic properties to meet contemporary needs and/or  inform citizens with regard to history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, and culture.  Goal 2: Effective Information Management  Vision: Having a cooperative data management system that efficiently compiles and  tracks information regarding historic properties, preservation methods and programs,  projects and opportunities; and provides the means to make this information readily available  to appropriate users.  Goal 3: Maximized Funding  Vision: Having preservation programs that operate at maximum efficiency and support  networks that take advantage of diverse funding and volunteer opportunities.  Goal 4: Integrated Preservation Planning  Vision: Having preservation principles and priorities fully integrated into broader planning  efforts of state and federal agencies, local governments, and private development to help  achieve the goals of historic preservation, including sustainable economic and community  development.                             Category 2, Toward an Informed and Supportive Constituency  Goal 5: Proactive Partnerships  Vision: Having a strong preservation network of agency, tribal, county, community, and  advocate partners that communicate preservation values and share preservation programs  with the broader Arizona community, its institutions, and individuals.  Goal 6: Public Support  Vision: Having an educated and informed public that embraces Arizona’s unique history,  places, and cultures, and is motivated to help preserve the state’s historical patrimony.  Goal 7: Policy Maker Support  Vision: Having informed policy makers that appreciate the importance of historic properties to  the economic, social, historical, and cultural development of the state, counties, and  communities.  10 Goal 8: Informed Professionals  Vision: Having a full range of educational programs that are available to both established and  new preservation professionals to ensure that the highest standards of treatment and  identification are applied to the state’s historic properties.  Familiarity with these goals and the Arizona State Historic Preservation Plan Update 2009  is essential for Oro Valley in order to provide a broader framework for planning consistent  with state priorities.  Local Preservation Planning  It is hereby declared as a matter of public policy that the Town of Oro Valley joins  with the United States of America and the State of Arizona in promoting the  protection, enhancement, and perpetuation of properties, areas, documents,  and artifacts of historic, cultural, archaeological, and aesthetic significance as  being necessary for the economic, cultural, educational, and general welfare of  the public. This is done pursuant to the provisions of the National Historic  Preservation Act of 1966 as amended, the Arizona Revised Statutes, Section 9‐ 462.01, and the establishment of this Historic Preservation Ordinance by the  Oro Valley Town Council. (Purpose. Historic Preservation Ordinance Article 6‐ 10).  Oro Valley is a relatively young town, created in response to the city of Tucson plans to  annex much of northern Pima County along the Canada del Oro. At the time of its  incorporation in 1974 the Town encompassed 2.5 square miles and was home to about 800  residents. Today, the Town encompasses more than 36 square miles and has a population  of over 44,000. Ranching and homesteading traditions still exist in this modern dynamic  community that provides full public services.  The Town currently has guidance for cultural resources and preservation planning in the  Town’s General Plan Focus 2020 (2005), the Town of Oro Valley Historic Preservation  Ordinance, several zoning ordinances, and the Environmentally Sensitive Lands Ordinance.  These policies and direction are integrated into the preservation plan and are available in  Appendix C.  One of the most important elements in relation to preservation planning is the identification  of local community criteria to be applied in evaluations of cultural resources as well as use of  the National Register criteria. Cultural resources are significant locally “if the resource is  preserved in a condition of scientific integrity and the property or resources contribute to: a)  the unique identity of the community; or b) the enhancement of community economic,  educational, or recreational needs; or c) the understanding of the unique religious,  mythological, or social character of a discrete population within or outside the community”  (e(v)3(2)ii(a‐c)).  11 Current Oro Valley preservation planning is based on the report from the Oro Valley  Cultural Resources Inventory, Rock Art, Ranch, and Residence: Cultural Resources in the Town of  Oro Valley and Its Planning Area, approved by the Town Council in May 2010 (Appendix C). The  inventory consolidates available information on cultural resources, includes a review of archival  records, and provides substantial data about prehistoric sites, historic neighborhoods, and  general historic patterns of occupation and use in the area. A series of historic contexts are  defined for evaluating the significance of cultural resources in the Oro Valley area.  The Town endorses the Sonoran Desert Conservation Plan (Town Council approval 2008) and has  participated in planning for the proposed Santa Cruz Valley National Heritage Area designation  currently being considered by Congress. The Town lies within Pima County and coordinates as needed on historic preservation matters.  The County’s bond program has been instrumental in the Town’s acquisition of the historic Steam  Pump Ranch and in preserving a portion of the Honey Bee Village archaeological site in public  ownership. Restoration of historic ranching sites and preservation of irreplaceable at‐risk  archaeological sites are priorities for County efforts to preserve the heritage of Pima County and  southern Arizona.  Appendix B  builds on the legal context for historic preservation by providing cultural  resources strategies for effective management and action items for the local community.  The underlying themes are an attempt to foster a community‐wide commitment to preserving  important places of our past, developing a comprehensive toolbox to engage and  educate residents, and highlighting opportunities for sustainable cultural resources  management.                                  12 APPENDIX B: STATUS OF ORO VALLEY CULTURAL RESOURCES  AND TOOLS FOR THEIR MANAGEMENT AS OF 2011  Rock Art, Ranch, and Residence: Cultural Resources in the Town of Oro Valley and Its  Planning Area is a useful summary of previous efforts to document cultural resources in the  Town and its planning area, but it also shows the substantial gaps in our knowledge of these  resources. As an important example, only about 35 percent of the Oro Valley Planning Area has  been systematically surveyed for archaeological sites, and much of that work took place  more than 10 years ago. Because the Arizona SHPO considers any archaeological survey  more than 10 years old to be inadequate for evaluating the current archaeological potential  of a location (and this is echoed in the Town’s Environmentally Sensitive Lands Ordinance),  the actual total survey coverage in the Oro Valley Planning Area should be considered  substantially less than 35 percent. Although many previously surveyed areas are now fully  developed for residential or commercial use, which means they are unlikely to require  archaeological survey in the future, a significant portion of the Town and its planning area  remain archaeologically unstudied.  Another obvious gap in our knowledge of Oro Valley’s cultural resources is the general lack  of information about potentially historic residential architecture in the Town. Although Oro  Valley did not incorporate until 1974, its land base has a significant amount of residential  architecture that is at least 50 years old and is therefore potentially historic. Rock Art, Ranch,  and Residence included preliminary examination of seven of the earliest residential  developments in the Town, four of which are considered potential candidates for  nomination to the National Register as residential historic districts. Field documentation of  these neighborhoods, along with more historical research, will be required to pursue  formal evaluations of historical significance and possible nomination, but it is clear from  the initial work that these (and soon other) early residential developments in Oro Valley are  potentially valuable parts of the community’s heritage.  Oro Valley can build on previous efforts to identify, evaluate, and protect cultural resources in  the Town by using five basic tools: (1) archaeological inventories; (2) residential neighborhood  surveys; (3) National Register nominations; (4) protection of historic properties; and (5)  preservation incentives. Each of these tools is discussed briefly below. Further discussion of the  ways these tools can be applied in Oro Valley is provided in Appendix B, along with a list of specific  preservation priorities in the Town.  Archaeological Inventories  To avoid unanticipated damage to archaeological resources, proposed ground‐disturbing  projects in Oro Valley should be preceded by an evaluation of the archaeological potential of  the affected parcel by an archaeologist who meets the Secretary of Interior standards. The  principal basis of an evaluation is an inventory of the archaeological sites either previously  recorded or newly recorded in a survey conducted for the proposed project. In some cases,  the inventory will be limited to a search of the records of previous archaeological surveys and  13 previously recorded archaeological sites, along with a consideration of previous disturbances to  the parcel. In other cases, the inventory will require a walking survey of the affected parcel.  Archival research may also be necessary to evaluate the possibility that historic‐period  archaeological features are present on the parcel.  Archaeological evaluation is necessary both for projects on previously undeveloped parcels and  for projects where the parcel has already seen development. In many cases, a previous  development project, such as the construction of a building or a set of buildings, will have  greatly reduced or eliminated the archaeological potential of a parcel, but even on parcels  where the original ground surface has been completely altered or obscured, intact  archaeological features may still exist below the level of construction impacts.  While the Town is often limited to evaluating the potential impacts of individual, relatively  small development projects on archaeological resources, a more cost‐effective way to  ensure that significant resources are not compromised is to carry out a systematic  archaeological inventory of a large area. Oro Valley and its planning area still hold substantial  areas of undeveloped land which are likely to become the focus of plans for large residential  or commercial developments. The development of such areas presents an opportunity both  to document an extensive area archaeologically and to incorporate a plan for the  protection and interpretation of significant cultural resources into the overall plan of  development.  In all cases, inventory and evaluation of archaeological and historic resources should  include consideration of the historic contexts identified for Oro Valley in Rock Art, Ranch, and  Residence. For prehistoric sites the contexts are cultural affiliation and interaction,  chronology, diet and subsistence, and community organization. For historic sites the contexts  include early transportation routes and the Canada del Oro crossing, cattle ranching and  homesteading in the Canada del Oro area (1869–1962), and early residential development in  the Cañada del Oro area (1945–1974).  Residential Neighborhood Surveys  The initial survey of residential architecture carried out for Rock Art, Ranch, and Residence  showed that four of the earliest subdivisions in the Town are potentially eligible for  nomination to the National Register as residential historic districts and should be  considered for historic district designation, consistent with the Town’s historic preservation  ordinance. They are: Oro Valley Estates, Suffolk Hills, Campo Bello, and Shadow Mountain  Estates. The report recommended that the Town consider nominating each of the four  subdivisions to the National Register, with the consent and cooperation of the residents.  Because of the preliminary nature of the inventory survey, it is not certain that the SHPO will  agree that any of the four subdivisions is appropriate for a National Register nomination. Before  deciding to pursue a nomination, which can be a significant expense, a determination of  eligibility should be made for a selected subdivision by the SHPO. Obtaining a determination  14 of eligibility involves contacting the SHPO, providing a minimal level of documentation about  the selected subdivision, and arranging for the SHPO staff to visit and tour the subdivision. If  the SHPO determines that the subdivision is eligible for listing on the National Register, a  nomination is warranted. Local designations may also be pursued at this time.  The number of subdivisions in Oro Valley that are potentially eligible for listing on the  National Register will only rise as other neighborhoods reach the minimum requirement for  district eligibility—when at least 50 percent of the houses are at least 50 years old.  Determining the National Register eligibility of a neighborhood beyond the simple age  requirement requires a survey by an architectural historian, or by non‐historians under the  direction of an architectural historian.    15 Tangerine Rd.  Joseph E. McAdams House Naranja Rd.  Steam Pump Ranch Lambert Ln.  Oro Valley Estates Overton Rd.  Linda Vista Citrus Tracts No. 2 Shadow Shadow Oro Valley Town Limits Campo Bello Mountain Estates Mountain Estates East Fairhaven Village Magee Rd. Countess of Suffolk Forest Lodge Suffolk Hills Locations of the seven pre‐1974 subdivisions surveyed for the inventory, and the locations of the Countess of  Suffolk Forest Lodge and the Joseph E. McAdams house.  16 The survey for determining eligibility can consist of a “windshield” survey, or a preliminary pass to  establish the range of architectural styles and landscape features present in the neighborhood as  well as the general degree of integrity of both the architecture and the original subdivision plan.  National Register Nominations  There are a number of reasons for the Town to encourage the nomination of historic properties  to the National Register, whether the property is an archaeological site, a historic district, or an  individual building. First, when a historic property is listed on the National Register, it achieves a  special recognition as a place of importance in local, state, or national history, thus strengthening  the community’s awareness of, and pride in, its unique heritage. Second, properties on the  National Register are granted a degree of protection from impacts by federally funded or permitted  projects, because all such impacts are subject to review and comment by the Advisory Council  on Historic Preservation. Finally, there are significant tax incentives for the owners of properties  listed on the National Register.  It is important to emphasize that listing a property on the National Register does not prevent  the owner of the property from remodeling, repairing, altering, selling, or even demolishing the  property, provided that the action does not involve federal or state funding or permitting. Neither  is the owner obligated to make repairs or improvements to the property. It is equally important  to emphasize that listing on the National Register does not ensure that a federal or state project  will not adversely affect the listed property under every circumstance. It only ensures that any  project with a potentially adverse effect, and that receives federal or state funding or permitting,  will receive a federal‐ or state‐level review.  Currently, only one property in Oro Valley is listed on the National Register—Steam Pump Ranch,  a historic ranch complex established in the 1870s. Other properties have been determined eligible  for listing (e.g., the Honey Bee Village archaeological site), and others have been identified as  most likely eligible. As Rock Art, Ranch, and Residence made clear, this small number of listed  properties belies the number of important archaeological and historic sites previously recorded  in the Town and its planning area. Of the 185 previously recorded sites in the planning area,  six others have been determined eligible for listing and another 29 have been recommended  eligible for listing by their recorders. Many of the recorded sites have never been evaluated, and  some have probably been destroyed by development since they were recorded. But there is little  question that other sites in the Town and its planning area, both previously recorded sites and  sites yet to be discovered, are eligible for listing on the National Register.  In the Oro Valley Cultural Resources Inventory, four neighborhoods in the Town were recommended  for nomination to the National Register as residential historic districts, provided that the SHPO  gave a determination of eligibility to each neighborhood. Given a determination of eligibility,  the Town should approach the neighborhood association for the subdivision, or the residents  themselves, and recommend that a nomination be prepared. The nomination process, which  includes writing a detailed historic context for the subdivision and preparing SHPO historic building  inventory forms for all of the houses, could be funded directly by the Town, by contributions  from the neighborhood residents, or by a combination of these sources. When each resident  17 contributes a portion of the nomination cost, individual contributions are usually smaller when  the neighborhood is large, because much of the expense of a nomination is in the historic context,  which is generally the same for any size of neighborhood. In other words, the per‐house cost of a  nomination declines as the number of houses increases.  There are also individual buildings in Oro Valley worthy of nomination. Two architect‐designed  residences—the Countess of Suffolk Forest Lodge and the Joseph E. McAdams house—predate  planned developments in the Town and are important as individual architectural properties.  Both residences merit nomination to the National Register. This would require the consent and  cooperation of the separate private owners but would benefit the larger community by drawing  attention to the presence of important historic architecture in the Town. The Town can also make  an effort to identify and nominate other individual properties of distinction.  Protection of Historic Properties  Archaeological sites are the historic properties most vulnerable to unintentional damage through  development or natural processes, or through intentional damage by vandalism. It is fortunate  that Honey Bee Village, a major prehistoric site, is protected in public ownership and by physical  barriers to access, but other important prehistoric and historic sites exist in the Town that also  need protection. An important first step in protecting these sites would be to assess the potential  threats to each site and establish a priority list for taking protective measures that can be made  with the consent and cooperation of the property owners.  Historic architecture, especially if left unoccupied or unused for any length of time, is also subject  to damage through natural processes and vandalism. As with archaeological sites, the Town can  identify individual buildings that are or may soon be historic, assess the possible threats to the  historic integrity of the buildings, and establish a priority list for taking protective measures, again  with the consent and cooperation of the property owners.  Preservation Incentives  State and federal tax incentives are available for the owners of National Register–listed properties  that meet certain criteria. Full information about the state and federal programs behind these  incentives is available from the SHPO, but the main features are described in the following  paragraphs adapted from the SHPO website (http://azstateparks.com/SHPO/tax.html).  Investment Tax Credit (ITC) Program  The ITC program permits owners and some lessees of historic buildings to take a 20 percent  federal income tax credit on the cost of rehabilitating such buildings for industrial, commercial, or  rental purposes. This program also permits depreciation of such improvements over 27.5 years for  a rental residential property and 31.5 years for commercial property. The rehabilitated building  must be a certified historic structure that is subject to depreciation, and the rehabilitation must  be certified as meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation, established by  the National Park Service (NPS).  18 Only projects involving certified historic structures are eligible for tax credits. According to program  rules, a certified historic structure is: a structure individually listed in the National Register of  Historic Places, or; a structure certified by NPS as contributing to a registered district. A registered  district is a designated area listed in the National Register, or listed under a state or local statute  certified as substantially meeting the requirements for listing of districts in the National Register.  State Historic Property Tax Reclassification (SPT) for Owner‐Occupied Homes  The State Historic Property Tax (SPT) program offers a substantial reduction in the state property  tax assessment for eligible owners. This 15‐year agreement requires maintenance of the property  according to federal and Arizona State Parks Board standards and is limited to property used for  non‐income‐producing activities. In order to qualify for the SPT program, the property must be  listed on the National Register, either individually or as a contributor to a historic district. The  program is managed by the SHPO in conjunction with Arizona’s county assessor’s offices. The SHPO  determines program eligibility and monitors property maintenance, and the county assessor enacts  tax classification changes, manages issues of property value, and tax calculation. Properties must  meet the minimum maintenance standards established by the Arizona State Parks Board.  Achieving the goals of the Oro Valley historic preservation planning will require a sustained and  systematic effort on the part of the Town to identify and evaluate its known and yet to be recorded  cultural resources. The above items provide the broad parameters within which specific actions,  described in Appendix A, can be carried out.                              19 APPENDIX C:  REFERENCES FOR ORO VALLEY CULTURAL HERITAGE PRESERVATION PLANNING  (DOCUMENTS INCLUDED ON CD)  1. Rock Art, Ranch, and Residence: Cultural Resources in the Town of Oro Valley and its Planning  Area. Prepared by Scott O’Mack. William Self Associates Technical Report No. 2009‐51, January  2010.  ‐‐Recommend inclusion on Town of Oro Valley website for Cultural Resources (excluding  site listing tables).  2. Oro Valley Historic Preservation Ordinance—Historic Preservation Code (06/20) Article 6‐10.  Adopted 10/04/2006.  ‐‐http://www.codepublishing.com/az/orovalley/  3. Environmentally Sensitive Lands Ordinance, Section 27.10  ‐‐http://www.orovalleyaz.gov/Assets/_assets/DIS/Planning/pdf/ESL+Final+Draft.pdf  4. Focus 2020, The Future In Balance, Town of Oro Valley General Plan, 2005  ‐‐http://www.orovalleyaz.gov/AssetFactory.aspx?did=4955  5. Steam Pump Ranch Master Plan  ‐‐http://www.orovalleyaz.gov/Assets/_assets/parks_rec/PDF/SPR_Draft_April+7.pdf  6. Deed of Preservation Easement between the Town of Oro Valley, a municipal corporation  (Grantor), and Pima County, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona (Grantee) for the  Steam Pump Ranch property. 2008.  ‐‐Recommend adding Easement to Town’s cultural resources website (18 pages).  7. Intergovernmental Agreement between Pima County and the Town of Oro Valley for the  Implementation of the 2004 Pima County Bond Issue Project for the Steam Pump Ranch  Acquisition. 2006.  ‐‐Recommend adding to Town’s cultural resources website (16 pages)  8. National Register of Historic Places National Register Nomination.  9. Honey Bee Village Archaeological Preserve Implementation Plan. February 2007  ‐‐http://www.orovalleyaz.gov/Assets/_assets/residents/Culture_and_History/pdf/  honeybee‐plan.pdf  10. Arizona State Historic Preservation Plan. Update 2009.  ‐‐http://azstateparks.com/SHPO/downloads/SHPO_Plan_2009_Final.pdf          20 APPENDIX D: HELPFUL ONLINE HISTORIC PRESERVATION REFERENCES  Note. References on prehistory and history of the Oro Valley area can be found in Rock Art, Ranch,  and Residence (2010).  1. Historical Archaeology Research Guide.  Compiled by James E. Ayres, Carol Griffith, and Teresita Majewski with contributions by the SHPO  Advisory Committee on Historical Archaeology.  http://azstateparks.com/publications/downloads/SHPO_2008_Historical_Archy_Guide.pdf  2. Arizona Heritage Preservation Education Materials.  By Carol J. Ellick: An annotated bibliography of archaeological, architectural, and preservation  education materials relating to Arizona for grades K–12.  http://azstateparks.com/SHPO/downloads/SHPO_Biblio_AHP.pdf    3. Arizona Historical Society educational materials.  http://www.arizonahistoricalsociety.org/education/educators/t_resources/    4. Arizona Memory Project.   http://azmemory.lib.az.us/    5. Arizona State Historic Preservation Office  http://azstateparks.com/SHPO/index.html    6. Historic Context Study Guides:  These publications compile research and evaluation of several  topics that are key to understanding Arizona history, prehistory, and resources. Topics include   Homesteading,  Commerce  in Phoenix, Gold and Silver Mining, the Chinese in Arizona, the  United States Military in Arizona, Transcontinental Railroading, Prehistoric Rock Art, Historic  Trails, Prehistoric to Historic Transition Period, Paleoindian and Archaic Sites, and Prehistoric  Water Utilization and Technology in Arizona. The guides are available from the SHPO.  (http://azstateparks.com/SHPO/index.html)    7. National Register of Historic Places   General Information. http://www.nps.gov/nr/    8. National Register listings and nomination procedures.               http://www.nationalregisterofhistoricplaces.com/    9. National Register information bulletins. http://www.nps.gov/history/nr/publications/#bulletins          Historic preservation laws and regulations. http://www.nps.gov/history/laws.htm  10. Sonoran Desert Conservation Plan        www.pima.gov/CMO/SDCP/  Town Council Regular Session Item # D. Meeting Date:06/18/2014   Requested by: Amanda Jacobs Submitted By:Amanda Jacobs, Town Manager's Office Department:Town Manager's Office Information SUBJECT: Resolution No. (R)14-36, authorizing and approving an Operating Agreement between the Town of Oro Valley and Greater Oro Valley Arts Council D.B.A. Southern Arizona Arts and Cultural Alliance (SAACA) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Staff has developed an Operating Agreement between the Town of Oro Valley and the Greater Oro Valley Arts Council D.B.A. Southern Arizona Arts and Cultural Alliance (SAACA).  The agreement provides a framework to work together through an ongoing partnership.  The Town partners with SAACA to deliver programs to the community. BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: SAACA will provide the following programs/concerts on behalf of the Town: Just for Kids Concert Series/Musical Magic for Kids (1st Saturday of every month)  - $13,200 Oro Valley Concert Series at Oro Valley Marketplace (2nd Thursday of every month) - $9,600 *Steam Pump Ranch Concert Series (9 concerts) - $4,000 *The number of concerts at Steam Pump Ranch may be reduced to begin a mini concert series at San Dorado. In additional, SAACA will continue holding major events in Oro Valley, such as the Festival of the Arts and the Classic Car Show, BBQ and Blues Festival. FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact is $26,800 in the Bed Tax Fund. SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to (adopt or deny) Resolution No. (R)14-36, authorizing and approving an Operating Agreement between the Town of Oro Valley and SAACA. Attachments (R)14-36 SAACA Operating Agreement SAACA Operating Agreement C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 6\@BCL@D00BECD5\@BCL@D00BECD5.doc Town of Oro Valley Attorney’s Office/ca/040312 RESOLUTION NO. (R)14-36 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING AN OPERATING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY AND THE SOUTHERN ARIZONA ARTS AND CULTURAL ALLIANCE (SAACA) WHEREAS,pursuant to A.R.S. § 9-500.11, the Town may appropriate public monies for and in connection with economic development activities as long as there is adequate consideration; and WHEREAS, the Town desires to promote the artistic and cultural activities within the Town which enhance the community; and WHEREAS,the Town of Oro Valley desires to enter into an operating agreement with SAACA to enhance access to the arts and to promote cultural awareness; and WHEREAS,it is in the best interest of the Town to enter into the Operating Agreement with SAACA, attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference, to set forth the terms and conditions of the Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, that: SECTION 1. The Operating Agreement between the Town of Oro Valley and the Southern Arizona Arts and Cultural Alliance attached hereto as Exhibit “A”, is hereby authorized and approved. SECTION 2. The Mayor and other administrative officials are hereby authorized to take such steps as necessary to execute and implement the terms of the Agreement. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, this 18 th day of June, 2014. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Dr. Satish I. Hiremath, Mayor C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 6\@BCL@D00BECD5\@BCL@D00BECD5.doc Town of Oro Valley Attorney’s Office/ca/0526102 ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM: Julie K. Bower, Town Clerk Tobin Sidles, Legal Services Director Date: Date: C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 6\@BCL@D00BECD5\@BCL@D00BECD5.doc Town of Oro Valley Attorney’s Office/ca/0526103 EXHIBIT “A” - 1 - OPERATING AGREEMENT THIS OPERATING AGREEMENT IS entered into by and between the TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, an Arizona municipal corporation (the “Town”), and the GREATER ORO VALLEY ARTS COUNCIL D.B.A. SOUTHERN ARIZONA ARTS AND CULTURAL ALLIANCE, an Arizona non-profit corporation (“SAACA”). The Town and SAACA are sometimes collectively referred to in this OPERATING AGREEMENT as the “Parties,” or “SAACA” either of which is sometimes individually referred to as a “Party.” RECITALS A. The Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley has determined that artistic and cultural ac- tivities within the Town are in the public interest and enhance the community. B. The Southern Arizona Arts and Cultural Alliance is a not-for-profit organization that ex- ists to ensure community engagement in arts and culture. To enhance access to the arts and to promote cultural awareness, SAACA presents large-scale festivals, events and other programs. SAACA also promotes educational opportunities in art and culture. C. The Town and SAACA desire for SAACA to present and promote artistic and cultural events and activities in the Town as described in this Operating Agreement. AGREEMENT NOW,THEREFORE, based on the foregoing recitals, which are incorporated here as the intent of the Parties in entering into this Operating Agreement, and in consideration of the terms of this Operating Agreement, the Parties hereby agree as follows: 1.Services to be performed by SAACA. a. General. In coordination with the Town, SAACA shall present, support, develop and implement community arts and culture projects and programs that enrich the cultural life of the community and that are consistent with the provisions of this Operating Agree- ment. b. Oro Valley Concert Series. SAACA shall present concerts for the Just for Kids Con- cert Series, also known as Musical Magic for Kids, 2nd Thursday Concert Series and Steam Pump Ranch Concert Series, including selecting, recruiting, approving and con- tracting with performers for the concert series. c. Major Town Special Events. SAACA shall assist in presenting and producing major events, such as Festival of the Arts and Classics & Oldies Car Show and Music Festival. SAACA shall select, recruit, approve and contract with vendors for booth exhibition are- as at the events. The vendors may include fine arts and crafts exhibitors, live art demon- strations, food vendors, dance and music performances and other arts and cultural exhib- its consistent with the theme of the special event and the terms of this Operating Agree- - 2 - ment. At any event for which SAACA secures the vendors, SAACA shall provide the Town with five complimentary booth spaces for use as the Town sees fit. d. Marketing. SAACA shall provide all marketing and promotion for events and concerts contracted presented and produced by SAACA for the Town. All marketing and promo- tional materials must be approved by the Economic Development Manager prior to their distribution to the public. 2.Effective date and duration. This Operating Agreement shall be effective July 1, 2014 through June 30, 2015 at which time the Operating Agreement may be renegotiated. 3.Funding. All funding is subject to the Town’s budget appropriations. For this Agreement, up to Twenty-Six Thousand and Eight Hundred Dollars ($26,800) shall be allocated to SAACA. 4.Relationship of the parties.In the performance of the services contemplated by this Oper- ating Agreement, SAACA shall act solely as an independent contractor, and nothing expressed or implied in this Operating Agreement shall be construed to create the relationship of employer and employee, partnership, principal and agent, or to create a joint venture between the Town and SAACA. 5.501(c)(3) status of SAACA. SAACA shall maintain its 501(c)(3) status as a non-profit corporation at all times relevant to this Operating Agreement. 6.Insurance. SAACA shall maintain insurance with the following required coverages and limits, and the Town shall be named as an additional insured on the commercial general liability insurance policy: Worker’s Compensation:Statutory Employer’s Liability:U.S. $1,000,000 Commercial General Liability:U.S. $1,000,000 per occurrence U.S. $2,000,000 aggregate Business Auto Liability:U.S. $1,000,000 combined single limit 7.Mutual indemnification. To the fullest extent permitted by law, each Party shall indemni- fy, defend and hold the other Party, its governing board or body, officers, departments, employ- ees and agents, harmless from and against any and all suits, actions, legal or administrative proceedings, claims, demands, liens, losses, fines or penalties, damages, liability, interest, result- ing from or arising out of any act or omission of the indemnifying Party, its agents, employees or anyone acting under its direction or control, whether intentional, negligent, grossly negligent, or amounting to a breach of contract, in connection with or incident to the performance of this Operating Agreement. 8.Regulatory compliance and approvals. Each Party shall at its own expense comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, rules, and regulations in connection with its obliga- tions under this Operating Agreement. As part of this obligation, SAACA shall obtain any and all permits prescribed by the Town, the Operating Agreement. In consideration of the services to be performed by SAACA under the terms of this Operating Agreement, to the extent legally permissible,the Town agrees to waive all Town of Oro Valley review and permit fees that SAACA would normally be required to pay for the events and activities SAACA produces pur- suant to this Operating Agreement. - 3 - 9.Appointment of representatives. To further the commitment of the Parties to cooperate in the activities described in this Operating Agreement, the Town and SAACA each shall designate and appoint a representative to act as a liaison for the Town and its various departments and SAACA. The initial representative for the Town (the “Town Representative”) shall be Amanda Jacobs, Economic Development Manager, and the initial representative for SAACA shall be Kate Marquez, Executive Director. The representatives shall be available at all reasonable times to discuss and review the performance of the Parties to this Operating Agreement and their re- sponsibilities in connection with the services to be performed under this Operating Agreement. 10.Town personnel. At the Town’s sole discretion, the Town may assign Town personnel to assist SAACA in performing the services described in paragraph 1 of this Operating Agreement. SAACA may also request assistance from Town personnel in the performance of these services by contacting the Town Representative. Assistance will be provided at the Town’s sole discre- tion. 11.Notices. All notices, requests, demands, and other communications under this Operating Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed given if personally delivered or mailed, certi- fied mail, return receipt requested; to the following addresses: If to the Town, to:TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Attn: Economic Development Manager 11000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley, AZ 85737 Cc:TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Attn: Town Attorney 11000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley, AZ 85737 If to SAACA, to:GREATER ORO VALLEY ARTS COUNCIL D.B.A. SOUTHERN ARIZONA ARTS AND CULTURAL ALLIANCE Attn: Executive Director 7225 N. Oracle Road, Suite 112 Tucson, Arizona 85704 12.Entire agreement.This Operating Agreement constitutes the entire agreement and under- standing of the Parties pertaining to the subject matter of the Operating Agreement and super- sedes all offers, negotiations, and other agreements of any kind. All prior and contemporaneous agreements, representations and understandings of the Parties, oral or written, are superseded and merged in this Operating Agreement. 13.Authority to execute agreement. The individuals executing this Operating Agreement hereby represent that they have full right, power, and authority to execute this Operating Agree- ment on behalf of their respective Parties. 14.Force majeure. Notwithstanding any other term, condition or provision of this Operating Agreement to the contrary, if any Party to this Operating Agreement is precluded from satisfying or fulfilling any duty or obligation imposed upon it due to labor strikes, material shortages, war, - 4 - civil disturbances, weather conditions, natural disasters, acts of God, or other events beyond the control of such Party, the time period provided herein for the performance by such Party of such duty or obligation shall be extended for a period equal to the delay occasioned by such events. 15.Immigration laws.SAACA warrants that it will at all times comply with all federal im- migration laws and regulations that relate to its employees and with Arizona Revised Statutes section (A.R.S. §) 23-214 (A). SAACA acknowledges that pursuant to A.R.S. § 41-4401 and effective September 30, 2008, a breach of this warranty is a material breach of this Operating Agreement subject to penalties up to and including termination of this Operating Agreement, and that the Town retains the legal right to inspect the papers of any employee who works on the Operating Agreement to ensure compliance with this warranty. 16.Scrutinized business operations.SAACA certifies that it does not have, nor will it for the duration of this Operating Agreement have, scrutinized business operations in Sudan or Iran as defined in A.R.S. § 35-391 and A.R.S. § 35-393, respectively. 17.Conflict of interest.This Operating Agreement is subject to the provisions of A.R.S. § 38-511, which provides for termination in certain instances involving conflicts of interest. 18.Attorneys’ fees. The prevailing Party in a civil action to enforce this Operating Agree- ment shall be entitled to recover from the other Party, in addition to any relief to which such prevailing Party may be entitled, all costs, expenses and reasonable attorneys’ fees incurred in connection with that civil action. 19.Governing law.This Operating Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Arizona. 20.Termination.Either Party may terminate its participation in this Operating Agreement for any reason upon at least fifteen days’ prior written notice to the other Party. 21.Miscellaneous. a. This Operating Agreement may not be modified except in a writing signed by both of the Parties. b. The captions and section numbers appearing in this Operating Agreement are inserted only as a matter of convenience, and do not define, limit, construe or describe the scope or intent of such sections or articles of this Operating Agreement. c. This Operating Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall, for all purposes, be deemed an original and all of which, taken together, shall con- stitute one and the same agreement. [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS] - 5 - IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Parties have duly executed this instrument below. The “Town” TOWN OFOROVALLEY, an Arizona municipal corporation Satish I. Hiremath, Mayor Date: ATTEST: Julie Bower, Town Clerk Date APPROVED AS TO FORM: Tobin Sidles, Legal Services Director Date “Greater Oro Valley Arts Council D.B.A. Southern Arizona Arts and Cultural Alli- ance” GREATER ORO VALLEY ARTS COUNCIL D.B.A.SOUTHERN ARIZONA ARTS AND CULTURAL ALLIANCE,an Arizona non-profit corporation Kate Marquez, Executive Director Date Town Council Regular Session Item # 1. Meeting Date:06/18/2014   Requested by: Bayer Vella Submitted By:Chad Daines, Development Infrastructure Services Department:Development Infrastructure Services Information SUBJECT: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE DIRECTION REGARDING EXPANSION OF THE ECONOMIC EXPANSION ZONE (EEZ) TO OTHER AREAS OF THE TOWN RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Town Council discuss this item and provide direction to staff on the possible expansion of the Economic Expansion Zone (EEZ). EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: In October 2012, Town Council adopted the Economic Expansion Zone (EEZ) to provide a streamlined review process for development within Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 3 (Innovation Park).  The EEZ is intended to promote the Town's economic development initiatives through a shortened review and approval process for projects in Innovation Park.  Mayor Hiremath and Councilmember Garner have requested this agenda item for Town Council's discussion, as well as to provide direction to staff on the possible expansion of the EEZ to other areas within Oro Valley.   BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: The Economic Expansion Zone (EEZ) provides a modified process whereby development review and approvals are done administratively, following an enhanced open house and public participation process to gain community input.  This modified process was successfully used recently with the Securaplane Technologies relocation to Innovation Park.  Expansion of the EEZ to other areas of the Town may help foster employment and other desired non-residential uses in other strategic locations throughout the community. In addition to expansion of EEZ, there are other methods and approaches to promote desired land uses in economically strategic locations in Oro Valley. The District, which is still in formation stages, is intended to establish a focal area along Oracle Road for the promotion of desired businesses, arts and cultural venues.  Use of an EEZ approach could be a component of such goals. FISCAL IMPACT: Promotion of employment and other revenue producing uses has a long-term positive impact on the fiscal stability of the Town. SUGGESTED MOTION: This item is for discussion.  Town Council may make a motion to direct staff such as: I MOVE to direct staff to initiate the expansion of the Economic Expansion Zone (EEZ) to other areas of the Town, specifically ____________________________. Town Council Regular Session Item # 2. Meeting Date:06/18/2014   Requested by: Councilmember Zinkin & Councilmember Garner Submitted By:Julie Bower, Town Clerk's Office Department:Town Clerk's Office Information SUBJECT: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THE NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES (NLC) SERVICE LINE WARRANTY PROGRAM RECOMMENDATION: N/A EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Councilmember Zinkin and Councilmember Garner have requested this item be placed on the agenda for discussion and possible action regarding the Town's participation in the program. BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: Councilmember Zinkin provided information on the NLC Service Line Warranty Program (attached) during Council Reports at the June 4th Council meeting. FISCAL IMPACT:    SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to ___________________ Attachments NLC Service Line Warranty Program NATIONAL LEAGUE of CITIES Ni National League of Cities Service Line Warranty Program Building Peace 01 Mind, One Community 01 a Time Educating homeowners about their service line responsibilities while providing an aHordable solution for repoirs. .r www.utilitysp.net Overview Offered at no cost to the municipality, the National League of Cities (N LC) Service Line Warranty Program, administered by Ut ility Service Pa rtners, In c., is an im portant tool for educating homeowne rs about their responsibi li ty for the latera l service line s on their property. With more than 190 mun icipal and ut ility relationships, the NLC Service Line Warranty Program also offers a solution, with a proven track record of pro vidi ng affordable, dependable serv ice line repair protection, giving homeowners and municipal leaders peace of mind . The Nat io nal League of Cities Service Li ne Warranty Pr ogram helps homeowners save thousands of doliars i n expensive ut il ity line repair costs while addressing the community's aging infrastructure. The NLC Service Line Warranty products o ffer aff ordable coverage for buried, external water and sewer lines from the utility connection po int to the home (incl uding the portion buried under conc rete slabs). Ser vin g your local community " It gives me peace o(mind as an elect ed official that this program can be offered to the citizens . It gives citizens peace of mind because they have a program with local , reliable contractors from where they can get the service . The city has peace of mind because it gets our local economy going as well as revenue and income to help others . " Felicia A. Moore, City Council Member Atlan ta, GA Frequently Asked Questions • What w ill the warranty p rogram cast the city and home o w n ers? There is absolutely no cost to the city for this warranty program and homeowner participation is completely voluntary . For a small monthl y fee, homeowners can protect the buried utility service lines on their property. The NLC Service Li ne Warranty Pr ogram provides generous cove rage with no deductibles , service fees or annual /lifetim e limits. • How does the program work? The NLC Se rvice Line Warran ty Prog ra m handles all aspects of the pro gram including marketing, billing, customer service, contractor management and completion of all repairs to local co de . • What happens w hen a homeowner experiences a service line break or leak on their property? One call to the NLC Servi ce Line Warranty Program 's toll-free number and a local, licensed contractor w ill be dispatched to quickly mak e repairs. There is no paper-work to compl ete; ju st one call for c lai ms proces sin g - ava ilable 2417,365 days a year. All contractors are local to the comm unity se rve d , which keeps dollars in your local economy. • • Why is the warranty program important? The American Soc iety o f Civi l Engineers labeled the natio n 's in frastructure a D+ in 2013 and it 's no surprise! Many people beli ev e that water and sewer l ine s wi ll last hundreds of yea rs without fail ing, bu t the truth is, there are man y reaso ns other than life expectancy of the pipes that can co ntribute to infrastructure fa il ure - such as tr ee-root intrusion , rust and weather. With the NL C Service Line Warranty Program , normal wear and t ear, groun d shifti ng, root-intrusio n , and much more are covered. Quick Facts The N LC Service Line Warranty Program is offered at no cost to municipa li ties and utilities. Join us today and enjoy these program features : , • The on ly utility line warranty program endorsed by National League of Cities • Educates homeowners about their serv ice line responsibilities • Service from licensed , local contractors keeps dollars in the local economy • Low claim denia l rates -more than 97% of all claims are typically approved • Customer satisfaction rates over 95% • Timely repa irs that help conserve water and reduce ground contamination About Utility Service Partners, Inc. L.. USP's family of companies have been provid ing uti li ty service line warranty products si nce 1998. USP has an A+ Better Bus iness Bureau Ra ting and enjoys a customer satisfaction rati ng of over 95%. National League of Cities NATIONAL LEAGUE of ClTI E S iIiiJij The National League of Cities is dedicated to helping city leaders build bette r commu nities, and serves as a resource and advocate for 19,000 cities, towns and villages, representing more than 218 million Amer icans. Make a Difference i n Your Community To learn more about the NLC Servi ce Line Warranty Program, vis it NLC's website at www.nlc.org or contact 1-866-974 -4801. www.utilitysp.netlpartnerships@utilitysp.netll·866-974-4801 NATIONAL Service Line Warranty Program LEAGUE of CITIES ~ NLC Service Line Warranty Pro gram Hi g hlights + Nearly 200 cities participating nati o nwide + No cost to o r liability f o r the city t o parti cipate + Healthy, ongoing annual revenue stream for city + Ed ucates ho me owners ab out the i r lateral li ne r esponsib iliti es Administer ed by L + Th e only utility line warranty program end o rsed by t he National League of Cities + Ut i lity Service Partners hand le s all marketing and managem ent o f th e prog ra m + 24 /7/365 b iling ual customer servi ce + All rep airs pe rfo rmed to city code by l oca l, li censed co ntractors + Reduces call s f rom resid ent s to City Hall for late ral wate r and sewer line issues + Ho meowner b illed by NLC Ser vice Line wa rranty Pr ogr am + USP is a No rth Central Te xas Council of Gove rnm ents (NCTCG) Shared Services Program Partn er + City pro v id es r es iden ts an affordab le so luti on that cove r s cos t of r epa irs t o water and sewer li nes f o r w h ich t he homeowner is r es ponsib le + Saved more t h an 60,000 homeowners across the country over $45 million in utility li ne repa ir costs + Public funds are not u se d in th e mark e ting, distribution or ad m in i st ration of th e NLC Serv ice Line Warran t y Pro gram + The NLC Service Lin e Warranty Pro gram must be sup porte d by th e city into wh ich it is being introduced b e fore any warr anty offer l e tters are m aile d to h o m eowne rs in th e community. Participating Cities (Sample of nearly 200) Large Atlanta , GA Madison, W I Phoen ix, AZ San Di ego, CA Small Day t on,O H Ed gewood, CO Fr ank lin Pa rk, IL Overland Pa r k, KS Utility Serv i ce Partner s, Inc. • 11 Grandvi ew Circle ' Suite 100 • Canon sburg , PA • 15317 z h ---BBB BBB Torch Award for Marketplace Ethics NLC Serv ice Lin e Warranty Pro gra m Be n efit s City Provides non-tax revenue stream without any investment Redu ces calls to City/Public Works when a homeowner's line fails Contractors und ergo rigorous vetting process to ensure repa irs meet city code Redu ces costs associated with sending public works to r es ident s' homes to assess lateral Residents Affordabl e utility line repair so lution for famili es on a budget Educates hom eo wners about their service lin e resp o nsib ilitie s Prevents aggravation of ha ving to find a reliabl e, reput ab l e plumber Pea ce of mind -with one toll-free call a plumber is dispatched (f'I li ne issues Il) ~. n Il) c: :J Il) ~ ..., OJ :J -'< -0 ..., o CD Keeps money i n th e local economy by us in g contractors in the metro area Contra ctors must be current w ith insura nce and required li ce nses Keeps money in the homeowne r's pocket; without warranty repairs cost $1,300-$4,000+ No service fee s or deductib l es, pa perwo rk or forms t o complete ~ Accolades & Accomplishments +Accredited Bett er Bus i ness Bureau member with A+ rating fo r over 10 years +2013 Western Pennsylvania Better Business Bureau Torch Award winner for Marketplace Ethics +More than 97 % of all submitted claims are approved +A customer satisfaction rating that has exceeded 95 % for more than a decade +9 of 10 customers surveyed have r eco mmended the program t o friends, f am il y and neighb o r s Le arn more about the pro gram onl in e at www .UtilitySP .net or call 1-866 -974-4801.