The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPackets - Council Packets (228) AGENDA ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION October 5, 2016 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CAÑADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS COUNCIL REPORTS DEPARTMENT REPORTS The Mayor and Council may consider and/or take action on the items listed below: ORDER OF BUSINESS: MAYOR WILL REVIEW THE ORDER OF THE MEETING INFORMATIONAL ITEMS CALL TO AUDIENCE – At this time, any member of the public is allowed to address the Mayor and Town Council on any issue not listed on today’s agenda. Pursuant to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, individual Council Members may ask Town Staff to review the matter, ask that the matter be placed on a future agenda, or respond to criticism made by speakers. However, the Mayor and Council may not discuss or take legal action on matters raised during “Call to Audience.” In order to speak during “Call to Audience” please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. PRESENTATIONS 1. Proclamation - Domestic Violence Awareness Month CONSENT AGENDA (Consideration and/or possible action) A. Minutes - September 21, 2016 B. Resolution No. (R)16-49, authorizing and approving an amendment to the FY 2016/17 adopted budget to increase the number of transit operators in the Transit Division budget C. Appointment to the Stormwater Utility Commission (SWUC) REGULAR AGENDA 1. PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING AN APPLICATION FOR A SERIES 12 (RESTAURANT) LIQUOR LICENSE FOR SAKURA SUSHI, LOCATED AT 12125 N. ORACLE RD. #105 2. PUBLIC HEARING AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON REQUESTS RELATED TO THE PROPOSED NAKOMA SKY SENIOR LIVING FACILITY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 1ST AVENUE AND NARANJA DRIVE: A. GRADING EXCEPTION TO ALLOW CUTS AND FILLS GREATER THAN 12 FEET B. CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN, LANDSCAPE PLAN, AND RECREATION AREA PLAN C. CONCEPTUAL ARCHITECTURE 3. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON REQUESTS RELATED TO A PROPOSED ASSISTED LIVING AND MEMORY CARE FACILITY LOCATED AT 9005 N. ORACLE ROAD A. CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN, LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RECREATION AREA PLAN B. CONCEPTUAL ARCHITECTURE 4. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE DIRECTION TO STAFF TO REVIEW POLICY REGARDING COUNCILMEMBER'S TRAVEL EXPENDITURES FOR CONFORMANCE TO BUDGET 5. MOTION TO REMOVE THE FOLLOWING ITEM FROM THE TABLE: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE DIRECTION REGARDING THE TOWN'S INVOLVEMENT IN THE OVERLOOK RESTAURANT LOCATED AT 10555 N. LA CANADA DRIVE, INCLUDING THE POSSIBILITY OF CONTRACTING THE SERVICES OR CLOSING THE RESTAURANT 6. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE DIRECTION REGARDING THE TOWN'S INVOLVEMENT IN THE OVERLOOK RESTAURANT LOCATED AT 10555 N. LA CANADA DRIVE, INCLUDING THE POSSIBILITY OF CONTRACTING THE SERVICES OR CLOSING THE RESTAURANT (This item is only necessary if the motion to remove the item from the table is successful) 7. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE DIRECTION REGARDING THE COMMUNITY ELEMENTS OF PHASES II AND III FOR THE AQUATICS CENTER FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS (The Council may bring forth general topics for future meeting agendas. Council may not discuss, deliberate or take any action on the topics presented pursuant to ARS 38-431.02H) CALL TO AUDIENCE – At this time, any member of the public is allowed to address the Mayor and Town Council on any issue not listed on today’s agenda. Pursuant to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, individual Council Members may ask Town Staff to review the matter, ask that the matter be placed on a future agenda, or respond to criticism made by speakers. However, the Mayor and Council may not discuss or take legal action on matters raised during “Call to Audience.” In order to speak during “Call to Audience” please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. ADJOURNMENT POSTED: 9/28/16 at 5:00 p.m. by pp When possible, a packet of agenda materials as listed above is available for public inspection at least 24 hours prior to the Council meeting in the office of the Town Clerk between the hours of 8:00 a.m. – 5:00p.m. The Town of Oro Valley complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If any person with a disability needs any type of accommodation, please notify the Town Clerk’s Office at least five days prior to the Council meeting at 229-4700. INSTRUCTIONS TO SPEAKERS Members of the public have the right to speak during any posted public hearing. However, those items not listed as a public hearing are for consideration and action by the Town Council during the course of their business meeting. Members of the public may be allowed to speak on these topics at the discretion of the Chair. If you wish to address the Town Council on any item(s) on this agenda, please complete a speaker card located on the Agenda table at the back of the room and give it to the Town Clerk. Please indicate on the speaker card which item number and topic you wish to speak on, or if you wish to speak during “Call to Audience”, please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. Please step forward to the podium when the Mayor announces the item(s) on the agenda which you are interested in addressing. 1. For the record, please state your name and whether or not you are a Town resident. 2. Speak only on the issue currently being discussed by Council. Please organize your speech, you will only be allowed to address the Council once regarding the topic being discussed. 3. Please limit your comments to 3 minutes. 4. During “Call to Audience” you may address the Council on any issue you wish. 5. Any member of the public speaking must speak in a courteous and respectful manner to those present. Thank you for your cooperation. Town Council Regular Session Item # 1. Meeting Date:10/05/2016 Proclamation - Domestic Violence Awareness Month October 2016 Information Subject Proclamation - Domestic Violence Awareness Month Summary Attachments Proclamation Town Council Regular Session Item # A. Meeting Date:10/05/2016 Requested by: Mike Standish Submitted By:Michelle Stine, Town Clerk's Office Department:Town Clerk's Office Information SUBJECT: Minutes - September 21, 2016 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: N/A BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: N/A SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to approve, (approve with the following changes) the September 21, 2016 minutes. Attachments 9-21-16 Draft Minutes 9/21/16 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 1 MINUTES ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION September 21, 2016 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hiremath called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT:Satish Hiremath, Mayor Lou Waters, Vice Mayor Brendan Burns, Councilmember Joe Hornat, Councilmember Mary Snider, Councilmember Mike Zinkin, Councilmember ABSENT:Bill Garner, Councilmember PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Hiremath led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS Communications Administrator Misti Nowak announced the upcoming Town meetings and events. COUNCIL REPORTS Vice Mayor Waters reported that he attended the 2016 Summit for Safer People, Safer Streets held at the United States Department of Transportations headquarters in Washington, D.C. Mr. Waters announced that the Town of Oro Valley won the Mayors’ Challenge Activity Award in the category of Educate and Enforce Proper Road Behavior By All. Vice Mayor Waters encouraged citizens to participate in the Community Conversation on Distracted Driving held on September 22, 2016 at the Hilton El Conquistador Golf & Tennis Resort. 9/21/16 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 2 Councilmember Snider recognized the Canyon Del Oro High School Orchestra for being selected to perform at Carnegie Hall in March of 2017. Mrs. Snider addressed several ways to help in the programs fund raising efforts for travel cost associated with the trip. Mrs. Snider also presented a $1000 check from the Town to CDO Orchestra to kick-off their fund raising efforts. DEPARTMENT REPORTS Communications Administrator Misty Nowak reported that the call for nominations for 2016 Volunteers of the Year was open. Nominations must be received by 5:00 p.m. on Friday, October 28, 2016. ORDER OF BUSINESS Mayor Hiremath reviewed the order of business and stated the order would stand as posted. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 1.2016 League of Arizona Cities and Towns Annual Conference Trip Report CALL TO AUDIENCE Oro valley resident Donald Bristow expressed his concerns with the General Plan. Executive Director of Sonoran Desert Mountain Bicyclists Evan Pilling spoke in support of maintaining access to State Trust Land via the WAPA easement and spoke of the importance of having access to these trails. Oro Valley resident John Spiker spoke in support of maintaining access to State Trust Land by way of the WAPA easement and spoke of the valuable impact this trail had on the community. Oro Valley resident Duncan Caldwell spoke in support of maintaining access to State Trust Land via the WAPA easement and addressed a list of perceived problems from the area homeowners. Oro Valley resident Angela Greynolds spoke in support of maintaining access to State Trust Land via the WAPA easement. Oro Valley resident Jason Fick spoke in support of maintaining access to State Trust Land via the WAPA easement. PRESENTATIONS 1.Proclamation -Military Family Month 9/21/16 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 3 Mayor Hiremath proclaimed the month of November, 2016 as Military Family Month in the Town of Oro Valley. Michael Reuwsaat, Vice President of Branch Operations for the YMCA of Southern Arizona, accepted the proclamation on behalf of the YMCA. Mr. Reuwsaat also encouraged citizens to attend the 2016 YMCA Community Military Ball, held on Friday, November 11, 2016 at the Tucson Convention Center. CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Zinkin requested that item (B) be removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion. Vice Mayor Waters requested that item (I) be removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion. A.Minutes -September 7, 2016 C.Resolution No. (R)16-43, authorizing and approving an archery Shooting Range Development Grant Agreement between the Arizona Game & Fish Department and the Town of Oro Valley in the amount of $10,000 for the purchase of materials to construct a shade canopy at the Naranja Park archery range D.Resolution No. (R)16-44, declaring and adopting the results of the Oro Valley Primary Election held on August 30, 2016 E.Resolution No. (R)16-45, authorizing and approving a task force agreement between the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and the Town of Oro Valley for the participation of one (1) Oro Valley police officer in the Pima County HIDTA Investigative Task Force (PCHITF) F.Resolution No. (R)16-46, authorizing and approving a task force agreement between the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and the Town of Oro Valley for the participation of two (2) Oro Valley police officers in the DEA Tucson Task Force G.Resolution No. (R)16-47, authorizing and approving a one (1) year extension, with two additional one (1) year options, to the lease between the Town of Oro Valley and Town West Realty, Inc. H.Request for approval of the Meritage at Stone Canyon VIII Final Plat, located north of Tortolita Mountain Circle approximately 1/4 mile west of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard 9/21/16 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 4 MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Snider and seconded by Councilmember Burns to approve Consent Agenda items (A) and (C -H). MOTION carried, 6-0. B.Fiscal Year 2016/17 Financial Update through July 2016 Councilmember Zinkin asked for clarification on attachment D-1 regarding the Community Center Fund. Finance Director Stacey Lemos clarified attachment D-1 regarding the Community Center Fund Balance and addressed the differences between fund balance and cash. MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Zinkin and seconded by Councilmember Burns to approve item (B). MOTION carried, 6-0. I.Approval of the Final Conceptual Design for the Veterans and First Responders Living Memorial at Naranja Park Vice Mayor Waters requested item (I) be removed from the Consent Agenda for a presentation, however the presentation was not available. MOTION:A motion was made by Vice Mayor Waters and seconded by Councilmember Snider to approve item (I). Discussion ensued amongst Council, Veterans and First Responders Living Memorial Task Force member Dick Eggerding and staff regarding item (I). MOTION carried, 6-0. REGULAR AGENDA 1.PUBLIC HEARING: AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP AND RANCHO VISTOSO PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD AND VISTOSO HIGHLANDS DRIVE a.RESOLUTION NO. (R)16-48, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN FUTURE LAND USE MAP FROM NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL/OFFICE TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL FOR A 17.8 ACRE PROPERTY, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD AND VISTOSO HIGHLANDS DRIVE 9/21/16 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 5 b.ORDINANCE NO. (O)16-12, AMENDING THE RANCHO VISTOSO PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT FROM COMMERCIAL (C-1) TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND ALLOWING THE USE OF AN ESL FLEXIBLE DESIGN OPTION FOR A MODIFIED REVIEW PROCESS FOR A 17.8 ACRE PROPERTY, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD AND VISTOSO HIGHLANDS DRIVE Paul Oland, of the WLB Group, representing the applicant, requested item #1 be continued to the November 16, 2016 Town Council meeting. MOTION: A motion was made by Mayor Hiremath and seconded by Councilmember Snider to continue item #1 to the November 16, 2016 Town Council meeting. MOTION carried, 6-0. 2.PUBLIC HEARING: RESOLUTION NO. (R)16 -36, ADOPTING THE YOUR VOICE, OUR FUTURE GENERAL PLAN AND SUBMITTING THE YOUR VOICE, OUR FUTURE GENERAL PLAN TO THE VOTERS OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Planning Manager Bayer Vella gave an overview of the Your Voice, Our Future General Plan and introduced Long Range Principal Planner Elisa Hamblin. Ms. Hamblin gave an overview of the Your Voice, Our Future General Plan that included the following : - Tonight's Meeting - Your Voice, Our Future Project - The Public Participation Plan - Project Schedule - What the community told us - Vision and Guiding Principles - Where we've been: Phase 1 - Your Voice Committees - Review Drafts - Where we've been: Phase 2 - Where we've been: Phase 3 - Vision and Guiding Principles - What matters most: Community (Ch. 3) - What matters most: Environment (Ch. 4) - What matters most: Development (Ch. 5) - Revisions included in the Final Plan - Planning and Zoning Commission - Three years of planning 9/21/16 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 6 - Recommendation - What's Next Discussion ensued amongst Council and staff regarding the Your Voice, Our Future General Plan. Mayor Hiremath opened the public hearing. The following individuals spoke on item #2. Oro Valley resident Shirl Lamonna Oro Valley resident Geri Ottoboni Oro Valley resident Ellen Guyer Oro Valley resident Diane Bristow Oro Valley resident Bill Rodman Oro Valley resident Michael Schoeppach Oro Valley resident and President and CEO of the Greater Oro Valley Chamber of Commerce Dave Perry Oro Valley resident Donald Bristow Mayor Hiremath closed the public hearing. Mayor Hiremath recessed the meeting at 7:41 p.m. Mayor Hiremath reconvened the meeting at 7:48 p.m. Discussion continued amongst Council and staff regarding the Your Voice, Our Future General Plan. Mayor Hiremath recessed the meeting at 7:56 p.m. Mayor Hiremath reconvened the meeting at 7:59 p.m. MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Zinkin and seconded by Councilmember Hornat to approve Resolution No. (R)16-36, adopting the Your Voice, Our Future General Plan, as inspired and created by the residents of the Town of Oro Valley as attached hereto as Attachment 1, subject to the condition and modifications found in Attachment 2 with the following corrections and conditions: Attachment 2, #1 "Amend the General Plan Land Use Map on page 51 for the Vistoso Highlands property from Neighborhood Commercial/Office to Medium Density Residential, as depicted below", shall be stricken. Attachment 1, Exhibit "A", a detailed index shall be added. Attachment 1, Exhibit "A", Chapter 6, page reference numbers shall be added. 9/21/16 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 7 Councilmember Burns requested an amendment to page 90, section 7.4.2 to change the language from "It shall be the responsibility of an applicant to submit information, studies and analysis that will enable all participants to adequately assess the request in relation to the criteria" to "The applicant for the amendment shall have the burden of presenting facts and other materials to support these conclusions". AMENDMENT:fails due to lack of second. Councilmember Burns requested an amendment to page 88 of the General Plan, Section 7.4.1, section 2a, to change "40 acres" to "20 acres". AMENDMENT:fails due to lack of second. MAIN MOTION:carried, 5-1, with Councilmember Burns abstaining. 3.DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING A PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN, LANDSCAPE PLAN AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL DISPLAY AREA FOR VIEWPOINTE AT VISTOSO TRAILS, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD AND MOORE ROAD Senior Planner Michael Spaeth gave an overview of item #3 that included the following: - Purpose - Conceptual Site Plan and Landscape Plan - Honey Bee Village Display Area - Architectural Display Area - Public Participation - Summary and Recommendation Discussion ensued amongst Council and staff regarding item #3. MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Snider and seconded by Councilmember Hornat to approve the proposed Conceptual Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Archaeological Display Area for Viewpointe at Vistoso Trails, subject to the conditions listed in Attachment 1, based on a finding the request is in conformance with the Rancho Vistoso PAD and the Design Principles and Design Standards of the Zoning Code, and further move to include, for resident awareness, that the "Covenants, Conditions & Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall contain a statement referencing the sites public access and trails. 9/21/16 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 8 Attachment 1 Planning 1. Remove dashes in reference to pre-application file number so the number is in the following format OV1500738. 2. Remove General Note 6. 3. In accordance with Section 27.6.C.6.b.vi, a six foot high opaque screen must be provided between the proposed loading zone and Moore Road. 4. Add the following General Notes to be consistent with the approved Block Plat: a. “Within two years of the date of recordation of the block plat (case number OV1501923), the Owner of Common Area “A” shall convey said Common Area “A” to the Town of Oro Valley for use as an Archaeological display area and to provide public access to the Honeybee Village Preserve. b. “The Archaeological display area will contain a Ramada, parking, and pedestrian connections to Moore Road and the future parking lot with the commercial parcel to the southwest.” Engineering 5. A license agreement will be required for the decorative pavement located within the Public streets. 6. Correct the spelling of “Public” on sheet 2 for Twintip Place. MOTION carried, 6-0. 4.DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE DIRECTION REGARDING THE TOWN’S INVOLVEMENT IN THE OVERLOOK RESTAURANT LOCATED AT 10555 N. LA CANADA DRIVE, INCLUDING THE POSSIBILITY OF CONTRACTING THE SERVICES OR CLOSING THE RESTAURANT MOTION:A motion was made by Vice Mayor Waters and seconded by Mayor Hiremath to Table item #4. MOTION carried, 6-0. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS 9/21/16 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 9 No future agenda items were requested. CALL TO AUDIENCE No comments were received. ADJOURNMENT MOTION:A motion was made by Vice Mayor Waters and seconded by Councilmember Snider to adjourn the meeting at 8:24 p.m. MOTION carried, 6-0. Prepared by: __________________________ Michelle Stine, CMC Deputy Town Clerk I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the regular session of the Town of Oro Valley Council of Oro Valley, Arizona held on the 21st day of September, 2016. I further certify that the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present. Dated this _____ day of ____________________, 2016. ___________________________ Michael Standish, CMC Town Clerk Town Council Regular Session Item # B. Meeting Date:10/05/2016 Requested by: Aimee Ramsey Submitted By:Aimee Ramsey, Development Infrastructure Services Department:Development Infrastructure Services Information SUBJECT: Resolution No. (R)16-49, authorizing and approving an amendment to the FY 2016/17 adopted budget to increase the number of transit operators in the Transit Division budget RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: In order for the Community Development and Public Works (CDPW) Transit Division to meet the expanding ridership demand for the Sun Shuttle Dial-a-Ride service, staff is requesting approval to increase operator staffing from 49 (currently budgeted at 23.05 FTEs) to 56 (proposed 24.97 FTEs). This will provide 7 additional part-time, non-benefited operators to meet both additional ridership requests and provide needed relief operators to cover staff sick and vacation shortages. The Town's adopted financial policies state that budget amendments or transfers between line items or major expenditure categories to fund additional personnel shall require the recommendation of the Town Manager and formal action by the Town Council; therefore, a budget amendment is requested to authorize the current operator cap of 49 (current budget of 23.05 FTEs) be raised to 56 (proposed 24.97 FTEs) with the associated increase in budget capacity to the Transit Division. The additional costs associated with the increase in Transit operators will be fully reimbursed by the Regional Transportation Authority (RTA). BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: The Town of Oro Valley partners with the Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) to provide the successful Oro Valley Sun Shuttle Dial-a-Ride transit service. Ridership growth continues with a new record set just last year of 45,202 annual passenger trips. This was an 18.8% growth over the previous year. Service is provided through an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with the RTA. Trips and service levels are developed through passenger demands and assessing manpower needs. Current operations and increasing ridership support that the current workforce is not sufficient to meet the growing community demand. Transit operator positions are directly related to supporting delivery of transit services identified in the Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) plan for Oro Valley. These positions are funded through the current Intergovernmental Agreement with the RTA. It is important that transit crew leaders assess manpower needs in relationship with community demands regularly in order to maintain the division’s ability to provide service in a timely, effective and efficient manner. A recent assessment concluded that the Transit Division is in need of covering an additional 2,230 hours of service. This requirement translates to an increase of 1.92 full-time equivalent employees (FTEs). Since these positions will be part-time, non-benefited, a total of 7 operators would be added to the current pool of 49, resulting in 56 total operators. These operators would work between 10 to 13 hours per week to remain within the increased budget capacity being requested. FISCAL IMPACT: Transit service costs are fully reimbursed through the IGA with the RTA. It is projected that the total cost of the additional operators would be approximately $80,280, with a potential reimbursement value of $94,775. The additional $14,495 will cover direct costs associated with the service increases. The proposed budget amendment would increase the approved FTEs for Transit Operators from 23.05 to 24.97 and transfer budget capacity of $94,775 from the General Fund contingency reserve budget to the Transit Division budget, resulting in no overall net change in the adopted FY 2016/17 General Fund budget of $41,220,985. SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to (approve or deny) Resolution No. (R)16-49, authorizing and approving an amendment to the FY 2016/17 adopted budget to increase the number of Transit Operators in the Transit Division and transfer budget capacity of $94,775 from the General Fund contingency reserve budget to the Transit Division budget. Attachments (R)16-49 Transit Operators Town Council Regular Session Item # C. Meeting Date:10/05/2016 Requested by: Mike Standish Submitted By:Michelle Stine, Town Clerk's Office Department:Town Clerk's Office Information SUBJECT: Appointment to the Stormwater Utility Commission (SWUC) RECOMMENDATION: The selection committee for the Stormwater Utility Commission recommends Richard Hawkinson for an unexpired term ending December 31, 2016. Please note that the unexpired term Mr. Hawkinson is filling expires at the end of this year. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The selection committee has conducted interviews to fill a vacancy on the SWUC. SWUC Council liaison Councilmember Garner, SWUC Chair Michael Stankiewicz and Stormwater Utility Division Manager Mike Todnem were members of the selection committee. Mr. Hawkinson is recommended for the vacant seat, and his application is attached for review. All unsuccessful candidates will be notified via letter from the Council liaison and will be advised that their applications will be kept of file for two (2) years. BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: The Stormwater Utility Commission (SWUC) was formed to make recommendations on issues relating to flood control and stormwater quality management and the issuance of bonds for stormwater activities and prescribes service charges. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to (approve or deny) the appointment of Richard Hawkinson to the Stormwater Utility Commission for a term expiring December 31, 2016, and that this partial term shall not count against the appointee's term limits. Attachments Application First Name Middle Initial Last Name Suffix Email Address Street Address Suite or Apt City State Postal Code Number of years in Oro Valley (If less than 1 year, please state number of months) Primary Phone Alternate Phone Submit Date: Jul 10, 2016 Status: submitted Town of Oro Valley Boards & Commissions Profile What district do you live in? Which Boards would you like to apply for? Storm Water Utility Commission Interests & Experiences Richard O Hawkinson Mr Oreo Valley AZ Oro Valley Resident 9 Richard O Hawkinson Mr Page 1 of 3 If yes, what year? Upload a Resume Please list your volunteer services in Oro Valley and with other organizations including any boards or commissions on which you have served : (board/commission , civic, educational, cultural, social, etc.) Was member of initial SWUC, 2001-2004, which prepared the Town's original SWMP for submittal to ADEQ. Between 2004-2008 worked for Town on storm water program activities as well as floodplain management needs including preparation of updated floodplain ordinance, and developed information requisite to the adoption of the first fee for storm water program. In the past year, As a volunteer helped prepare the 2014/15 SWMP report to ADEQ and have reviewed some chapters of floodplain ordinance which is under revision. How does your previous volunteer service prepare you for the board or commission appointment for which you have applied? Please describe an issue considered at a meeting of the Board or Commission for which you are applying. Having volunteered and worked for the Town, I am aware of many of the water quality and drainage issues in the Town. Also, have knowledge of other potential funding sources that on occasion could be available to help support program needs. I do not have resume on my computer but can provide hard copies as needed--please let me know. Briefly describe your educational/vocational background. BS and MS, 1966 and 1968, from University of Arizona. One year of additional graduate education at Johns Hopkins University, 1975-76 in environmental engineering program. Hydrologist with U.S. Geological Survey from 1968 to 2000 when I retired. Have you attended the Community Academy or CPI? Yes No If no, are you willing to attend? Yes No Hawkinson.pdf Richard O Hawkinson Mr Page 2 of 3 Please attach any additional documents here Please Agree with the Following Statement I Agree * Richard O Hawkinson Mr Page 3 of 3 Town Council Regular Session Item # 1. Meeting Date:10/05/2016 Requested by: Mike Standish Submitted By:Michelle Stine, Town Clerk's Office Department:Town Clerk's Office Information SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING AN APPLICATION FOR A SERIES 12 (RESTAURANT) LIQUOR LICENSE FOR SAKURA SUSHI, LOCATED AT 12125 N. ORACLE RD. #105 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this liquor license to the Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control for the following reasons: 1. No protests to this license have been received. 2. The necessary background investigation was conducted by the Police Department. 3. The Police Department has no objection to the approval of the Series 12 Liquor License. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application for a new Series 12 (Restaurant) Liquor License has been submitted by Owner Yiu Hong Lau for Sakura Sushi located at 12125 N. Oracle Rd. #105. Mr. Lau has submitted all necessary paperwork to the Town of Oro Valley and the Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and has paid all related fees associated with applying for the liquor license ($500 Application Processing Fee). BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: This non-transferable, on-sale retail privileges liquor license allows the holder of a restaurant license to sell and serve spirituous liquor solely for consumption on the premises of an establishment, which derives at least 40% of its gross revenue from the sale of food. Failure to meet the 40% food requirement shall result in revocation of the license. In accordance with Section 4-201 of the Arizona Revised Statutes, the application was In accordance with Section 4-201 of the Arizona Revised Statutes, the application was posted for 20 days on the premises of the applicant's property, ending September 15, 2016. No protests were received during this time period. Interim Police Chief Larry Stevens completed a standard background check on Sakura Sushi and Owner Yiu Lau. Interim Chief Stevens has no objection to the approval of the Series 12 (Restaurant) License. FISCAL IMPACT: Per Ordinance No. (O)11-16, the Town of Oro Valley charges a $500 liquor license application processing fee to cover the costs incurred by the Town to process the application. Per Section 8-2-6 Schedule of the Oro Valley Town Code, persons licensed by the State of Arizona to deal in spirituous liquor within the Town shall pay an annual license fee of $80.00 to the Town. SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to (recommend or deny) approval of the issuance of a Series 12 Liquor License to the Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control for Yiu Lau for Sakura Sushi, located at 12125 N. Oracle Road #105. Attachments Sakura Sushi Liquor License Town Council Regular Session Item # 2. Meeting Date:10/05/2016 Requested by: Bayer Vella Submitted By:Chad Daines, Development Infrastructure Services Department:Development Infrastructure Services Information SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON REQUESTS RELATED TO THE PROPOSED NAKOMA SKY SENIOR LIVING FACILITY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 1ST AVENUE AND NARANJA DRIVE: A. GRADING EXCEPTION TO ALLOW CUTS AND FILLS GREATER THAN 12 FEET B. CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN, LANDSCAPE PLAN, AND RECREATION AREA PLAN C. CONCEPTUAL ARCHITECTURE RECOMMENDATION: The Conceptual Design Review Board recommends approval of the requests, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1. The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board recommends approval of the community park and trailhead. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The purpose of this agenda item is to consider the proposed Nakoma Sky Senior Living Facility on 79 acres at the southeast corner of Naranja and 1st Avenue (Attachment 2). The planned facility is comprised of a main campus of buildings for senior apartments, assisted living and memory care units, support services and private recreational amenities to serve residents of the facility. A trailhead and community park area which will be open to Town residents are also planned within three years of the first phase of development. There are three requests associated with the development which include: Grading Exception, Site/Landscape/Recreation Plan and Architectural Plan: A. The Grading Exception is recommended for limited areas of the site, based on A. The Grading Exception is recommended for limited areas of the site, based on conformance with the following core objectives of the Zoning Code: Visibility of the most significant cuts and fills is minimized because they are screened by hillsides. Cuts and fulls near 1st Avenue are necessary to enable access to the site. Areas visible from 1st Avenue will be mitigated through building placement, recontouring and revegatation. B. The Site, Landscape and Recreation Plans conform with the approved rezoning designs (Tentative Development Plan - Attachment 3) and the Zoning Code for the property as follows: Buildings use hillsides to reduce visual impact on adjoining properties and from public roadways and development avoids negative impact to the natural wash areas and hillsides Recreational amenities are provided for public and private use The site conforms to senior care requirements, with a waiver requested for resident walkways to some parking areas The Architecture Plan incorporates methods established during the rezoning (Attachment 4) which reduce the perceived height and mass of buildings as follows: Varied roof and walls planes Varied materials and colors The applicant's submittal (Attachment 5) has been reviewed and recommended for approval by the Conceptual Design Review Board and the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board based on consistency with the PAD zoning and the Zoning Code. BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: Land Use Context The land use for this area is as follows: West: Large lot residential South/ East: CDO Wash, Steam Pump Ranch and commercial development North: Planned large lot residential General Plan: Master Planned Community (Attachment 6) Zoning: Nakoma Sky Planned Area Development (Attachment 7) Existing Site Conditions: 79 acres Vacant property including hillside areas and several wash corridors Approvals to Date: 1989: Rezoning to Rooney Ranch Planned Area Development (PAD) for a mix of uses including office, retail, multi-family residential and single-family residential 2005: Final Plat and Grading Exception approved for 68 lot subdivision 2014: Rezoning to Nakoma Sky Planned Area Development and Minor General Plan Amendment to clarify non-applicability of single-family policy 2015: Planned Area Development Amendment to modify the Tentative Development Plan and architectural concept. Proposed Improvements: First Phase Senior Apartment Units Assisted Living Units Memory Care Units Trailhead and multi-use paths Subsequent Phases Community Park within 3 years of main campus Commercial area and welcome center Transit stop on 1st Avenue when commercial area is constructed or when public transit service is provided on 1st Avenue, whichever first) A. Grading Exception: The Zoning Code controls the extent of earthwork allowed on a site to ensure that development "fits" into the site. To that end, It limits the extent one cuts into the ground or adds dirt to raise the site up. The Code sets the maximum height/depth of any cut or fill at 12 feet, unless a Grading Exception is granted by Town Council. The applicant has submitted a Grading Exception (Attachment 8) which has been evaluated based on the criteria in the Zoning Code (Attachment 9). The Grading Exception is warranted for the following reasons: Visibility of the most significant cuts and fills is minimized because they are screened by hillsides. Cuts and fulls near 1st Avenue are necessary to enable access to the site. Areas visible from 1st Avenue will be mitigated through building placement, recontouring and revegatation. In sum, all zoning criteria for a grading waiver have been satisfied. B. Conceptual Site/Landscape and Recreation Plan: The proposed site plan reflects careful planning of building locations to minimize visual impact as envisioned during the rezoning. As a result, taller buildings on the site are proposed on the south and east side of the hillside areas, which limit visibility from 1st Avenue and residential properties to the west and existing and planned residential areas north of the site. The plans conform with Town zoning and design principles. The following is noteworthy: Conforms with the senior care requirements for covered parking, open space, recreation areas, resident access plan and resident walkways to most parking areas. A waiver, as enabled by code, is requested for resident walkways to two parking areas. The waiver requests are recommended as these parking areas are not used by residents who drive. Recreational amenities are included for public and private use as established by the Tentative Development Plan. These amenities have been reviewed and recommended by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and are depicted in further detail in Attachment 5. The site plan conforms to the Environmentally Sensitive Lands section of the Zoning Code and exceeds Town open space requirements. The Landscape plan provides for attractive streetscapes and appropriate screening of loading and service areas Thematic details package is provided to ensure unified treatment of wall design, lighting standards, project signage and bench standards. Visible locations for public art have been identified on the Landscape Plan. A public art submittal is being developed through a call to artists process through Tucson Pima Arts Council and will be forthcoming. The projected daily traffic generation is very low and the surrounding roadway network will continue to operate under capacity with an acceptable level of service. The project conforms with the Town’s Drainage Criteria Manual and Floodplain Ordinance requirements. A detention waiver will be requested for consideration by the Town Engineer given its close proximity to the Canyon Del Oro Wash. For more detail, please see analysis of Design Principle conformance in Attachment 10. C. Conceptual Architecture: The original architectural concept approved in January 2015 as part of the rezoning consisted of a single five story building with step downs at the ends of the structure. In November 2015, Town Council approved a modified architectural concept which broke the single structure into multiple buildings of varying heights (Attachment 11). Rezoning conditions were included that require architectural techniques to reduce the perceived height and mass of the buildings, including: Varied roof and wall planes Varied materials and colors Landscaping terracing The proposed Architectural Plan (Attachment 12) conforms with Town's Design Principles (Attachment 10) by reducing the height and mass of buildings relative to the landscape. Public Participation Public participation was extensive and met all requirements of the Zoning Code. Notable elements of public outreach included: An extensive on-site tour of the proposed building heights, where area residents, advisory board and Town Council participated in viewing the proposed building heights from all vantage points around the property. Neighborhood meetings during the rezoning left no unresolved issues. As a result, no additional meetings were required, as enabled by the Zoning Code, during the design phase of the project. After public notice, most comments received focused on when the facility would be open. One email has been received relative to emergency planning (Attachment 13) Conceptual Design Review Board The requests were considered by the Conceptual Design Review Board (CDRB) on August 9th and September 20th. Discussion was focused on the architecture and grading exception applications. At the August 9th meeting and subsequent discussions, CDRB members requested fewer building materials to make the facades look less busy, use of warmer colors and limiting the use of landscaped terraces to public areas only. The revised design was reviewed at the September 20th and Board recommended approval of each request, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1.The CDRB staff reports are provided as Attachment 14 and the draft minutes are provided as Attachment 15. Parks and Recreation Advisory Board The Community Park and Trailhead were reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board on June 21st. The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board recommended approval of the Recreation Area Plan for these publicly accessible areas, subject to additional amenities which have been incorporated into the plan.The Parks and Recreational Advisory Board staff report is provided as Attachment 16 and the draft minutes are provided as Attachment 17. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A SUGGESTED MOTION: Grading Exception (Item A) I MOVE to approve the Nakoma Sky Senior Living Facility Grading Exception, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1. OR I MOVE to deny the Nakoma Sky Senior Living Facility Grading Exception finding that __________________________. Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Recreation Area Plan (Item B): I MOVE to approve the Nakoma Sky Senior Living Facility Conceptual Site Plan (including waiver of separated pedestrian access ways), Landscape Plan and Recreation Area Plan, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1. OR I MOVE to deny the Nakoma Sky Senior Living Facility Conceptual Site Plan (including waiver of separated pedestrian access ways), Landscape Plan and Recreation Area Plan finding that __________________________. Conceptual Architecture (Item C): I MOVE to approve the Nakoma Sky Senior Living Facility Conceptual Architecture. OR I MOVE to deny the Nakoma Sky Senior Living Facility Conceptual Architecture finding that __________________________. Attachments Attachment 1 - Conditions of Approval Attachment 2 - Location Map Attachment 3 - Tentative Development Plan Attachment 4 - Architectural Rezoning Conditions Attachment 5 - Applicants Submittal Attachment 6 - General Plan Attachment 7 - Zoning Map Attachment 8 - Grading Exception Request Attachment 9 - Grading Exception Analysis Attachment 10 - Design Principle Analysis Attachment 11 - November 2015 Modified Architectural Concept Attachment 12 - Proposed Architecture Composite Attachment 13 - Resident Email Attachment 14 - CDRB Staff Reports Attachment 15 - CDRB Minutes Attachment 16 - PRAB Staff Report Attachment 17 - PRAB Minutes Attachment 1 – Conditions of Approval Nakoma Sky Senior Living Facility OV1601351 Planning Conditions 1. The Grading Exception is limited as described and depicted on Attachment 8. The site shall conform to all other requirements relating to grading provided in the Nakoma Sky PAD and the Zoning Code. 2. All cut slopes shall be treated with a restorative aging agent and revegetated to reflect existing native vegetation. All areas of disturbance shall be recontoured to mimic existing grades and revegetated to reflect existing native vegetation. All graded areas shall be treated with an approved dust control method as provided in the Zoning Code. 3. A non-motorized public access easement over the public trail in the easternmost wash shall be dedicated as part of the Final Plat. 4. All plan sets shall be amended to reflect the sidewalks, pathways and trails as depicted on the Conceptual Site Plan. 5. The Transit Stop shall be constructed in conjunction with the development of the commercial portion of Nakoma Sky (Development Areas G/F) or at the time the Town of Oro Valley extends transit service north on First Avenue to the Nakoma Sky Property, whichever occurs first. 6. Pursuant to the Zoning Code, a waiver is granted to eliminate the pedestrian access ways to the lower level of the parking structure west of the main apartment building and to eliminate the pedestrian access ways to the parking structure north of the main apartment building. 7. The Community Park shall be completed as approved by the Town Council (except for the single unisex/family restroom) by the third anniversary of the Final Certificate of Occupancy for the apartment buildings and prior to construction of any future residential phase of the Nakoma Sky development. If a second phase of residential development proceeds within three years of the Final Certificate of Occupancy issuance, the Community Park may be constructed simultaneously with the second phase of residential construction and must be completed by the final Building Permit issuance for the second phase of residential construction. The single family restroom associated with the Community Park shall be required to be constructed at such time as a sewer line has been constructed in the street that will provide access to the residential units in the eastern portion of Development Area A and the residential units in Development Area A are being developed. Nakoma Sky Attachment 1 Conditions of Approval Page 2 of 2 Nakoma Sky shall provide the Town appropriate assurances (such as a bond) for the Community Park at the time of the Final Certificate of Occupancy for the main campus apartment building. The assurances shall be released at the time of substantial completion of the Community Park excluding the restroom. Town staff may determine assurances are not required at the time of Final Certificate of Occupancy if the Community Park is 25% complete. A public access easement over the community park and trailhead area shall be dedicated on the Final Plat. LOCATION MAP NAKOMA SKY (OV1601351) Attachment 2 TENTATIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NAKOMA SKY (OV1601351) Attachment 3 Architectural Rezoning Conditions 1. The building height of the apartment building in the campus core (Development Area C) shall step down in building height on the ends of the building to reduce the building mass and reduce the visual impact from the south and east to a greater extent as determined by the Conceptual Design Review Board and Town Council during the design phase of the development. 2. The visual impact of the bulk and mass of the apartment building in the campus core (Development Area C) shall be mitigated through the use of the following: a. Varied roof and wall planes, with a heightened emphasis on the roofline of the southern wing of the building. b. Differing building and roof materials and textures as shown in Appendix B. c. Landscaped terraces on multiple levels of the building shall be increased to provide a more uniform treatment of the building elevation. d. Low reflectivity windows. e. Several muted earth tone colors. f. Architectural features on the building to soften the building façade. g. Other measures approved by the Conceptual Design Review Board and Town Council which mitigate the visual impact of the building. The extent of mitigation shall be determined by the Conceptual Design Review Board and Town Council in conjunction with the Conceptual Design application. 3. The architectural character and theming of the project shown in Appendices A, B, and C will be enhanced and improved to reflect the design elements listed in Conditions 2, 3 and 5 to an extent determined by the Conceptual Design Review Board and Town Council during the design phase of the development. 4. Consistent roof plane variation, wall plane articulation and architectural treatment is required on all building elevations of every building within the PAD boundary as provided in Section 2.1.D. of Addendum A Design Standards. ARCHITECTURAL ZONING CONDITIONS NAKOMA SKY (OV1601351) Attachment 4 OWNER/ DEVELOPER: NAKOMA SKY, LLC 350 East Morningside Green Valley, AZ 85614 Attn: JONI CONDIT Joni@LaPosadaGV.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: TALLEY ASSOCIATES 1925 San Jacinto, Suite 400 Dallas, Texas 75201 Tel. 214-871-7900; Fax. 214-871-7985 ATTN: COY TALLEY ctalley@talleyassociates.com CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR NAKOMA SKY, PHASE 1A & PHASE 1B SHEET 1 OF 10 SEPTEMBER 2016 CONTOUR INTERVAL: 5' SCALE: AS SHOWN REF. CASE NO: OV115-027 OV914-008 OV914-007A OV903-03A (O) 15-14 SHEET INDEX: LOT 1 OF A RESUBDIVISION OF ROONEY RANCH AREA "Z" RECORDED IN BOOK 62, MAPS AND PLATS, PAGE 4, LOTS 1-68 AND COMMON AREAS A,B, AND C LYING WITHIN SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 14 EAST, GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA. APPROVAL ANY PLANT DEEMED SALVAGEABLE BY THE ZONING INSPECTOR SHALL BE SALVAGED. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY NATIVE PLANT SALVAGE PLAN APPROVED BY: PLANNING & ZONING ADMINISTRATOR DATE SHEET 1...........COVER SHEET SHEET 2...........CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET 3...........SIDEWALK & TRAILS SHEET 4...........MAIN ENTRY ROAD SHEET 5...........RESIDENTIAL & COMMONS AREA SHEET 6...........RESIDENTIAL & COMMONS AREA - ENLARGEMENT SHEET 7...........SECONDARY ACCESS ROAD SHEET 8...........OPEN BUILDING TERRACES PLANTING PLAN SHEET 9...........LANDSCAPE BUFFER PLANTING ENLARGEMENT SHEET 10...........LIGHTING DETAILS 20179/01/16OV1601351 LOCATION MAP COVER SHEET GENERAL NOTES CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR NAKOMA SKY, PHASE 1A & PHASE 1B LOT 1 OF A RESUBDIVISION OF ROONEY RANCH AREA "Z" RECORDED IN BOOK 62, MAPS AND PLATS, PAGE 4, LOTS 1-68 AND COMMON AREAS A,B, AND C LYING WITHIN SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 14 EAST, GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA.20179/01/16REF. CASE NO: OV115-027 OV914-008 OV914-007A OV903-03A (O) 15-14SEPTEMBER 2016 SHEET OF 10 OV1601351 CONTOUR INTERVAL: 1' SCALE: AS SHOWN CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR NAKOMA SKY, PHASE 1A & PHASE 1B LOT 1 OF A RESUBDIVISION OF ROONEY RANCH AREA "Z" RECORDED IN BOOK 62, MAPS AND PLATS, PAGE 4, LOTS 1-68 AND COMMON AREAS A,B, AND C LYING WITHIN SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 14 EAST, GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA.20179/01/16REF. CASE NO: OV115-027 OV914-008 OV914-007A OV903-03A (O) 15-14SEPTEMBER 2016 SHEET OF 10 OV1601351 CONTOUR INTERVAL: 1' SCALE: AS SHOWNSIDEWALK & TRAILS 16' WIDE MULTI- USE PATH TO EXTEND FROM FROM END OF MULTI-USE PATH ON BANK PROTECTION TO EASTERN PROPERTY LINE IN THIS AREA. CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR NAKOMA SKY, PHASE 1A & PHASE 1B LOT 1 OF A RESUBDIVISION OF ROONEY RANCH AREA "Z" RECORDED IN BOOK 62, MAPS AND PLATS, PAGE 4, LOTS 1-68 AND COMMON AREAS A,B, AND C LYING WITHIN SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 14 EAST, GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA.20179/01/16REF. CASE NO: OV115-027 OV914-008 OV914-007A OV903-03A (O) 15-14SEPTEMBER 2016 SHEET OF 10 OV1601351 CONTOUR INTERVAL: 1' SCALE: AS SHOWN PLANT LEGEND GENERAL NOTES MAIN ENTRY ROAD PLANT LEGEND GENERAL NOTES RESIDENTIAL & COMMONS AREA CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR NAKOMA SKY, PHASE 1A & PHASE 1B LOT 1 OF A RESUBDIVISION OF ROONEY RANCH AREA "Z" RECORDED IN BOOK 62, MAPS AND PLATS, PAGE 4, LOTS 1-68 AND COMMON AREAS A,B, AND C LYING WITHIN SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 14 EAST, GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA.20179/01/16REF. CASE NO: OV115-027 OV914-008 OV914-007A OV903-03A (O) 15-14SEPTEMBER 2016 SHEET OF 10 OV1601351 CONTOUR INTERVAL: 1' SCALE: AS SHOWN CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR NAKOMA SKY, PHASE 1A & PHASE 1B LOT 1 OF A RESUBDIVISION OF ROONEY RANCH AREA "Z" RECORDED IN BOOK 62, MAPS AND PLATS, PAGE 4, LOTS 1-68 AND COMMON AREAS A,B, AND C LYING WITHIN SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 14 EAST, GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA.20179/01/16REF. CASE NO: OV115-027 OV914-008 OV914-007A OV903-03A (O) 15-14SEPTEMBER 2016 SHEET OF 10 OV1601351 CONTOUR INTERVAL: 1' SCALE: AS SHOWN PLANT LEGEND GENERAL NOTES RESIDENTIAL & COMMONS AREA - ENLARGEMENT CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR NAKOMA SKY, PHASE 1A & PHASE 1B LOT 1 OF A RESUBDIVISION OF ROONEY RANCH AREA "Z" RECORDED IN BOOK 62, MAPS AND PLATS, PAGE 4, LOTS 1-68 AND COMMON AREAS A,B, AND C LYING WITHIN SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 14 EAST, GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA.20179/01/16REF. CASE NO: OV115-027 OV914-008 OV914-007A OV903-03A (O) 15-14SEPTEMBER 2016 SHEET OF 10 OV1601351 CONTOUR INTERVAL: 1' SCALE: AS SHOWN PLANT LEGEND GENERAL NOTES SECONDARY ROAD ACCESS CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR NAKOMA SKY, PHASE 1A & PHASE 1B LOT 1 OF A RESUBDIVISION OF ROONEY RANCH AREA "Z" RECORDED IN BOOK 62, MAPS AND PLATS, PAGE 4, LOTS 1-68 AND COMMON AREAS A,B, AND C LYING WITHIN SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 14 EAST, GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA.20179/01/16REF. CASE NO: OV115-027 OV914-008 OV914-007A OV903-03A (O) 15-14SEPTEMBER 2016 SHEET OF 10 OV1601351 PLANT LEGEND OPEN BUILDING TERRACES PLANTING PLAN CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR NAKOMA SKY, PHASE 1A & PHASE 1B LOT 1 OF A RESUBDIVISION OF ROONEY RANCH AREA "Z" RECORDED IN BOOK 62, MAPS AND PLATS, PAGE 4, LOTS 1-68 AND COMMON AREAS A,B, AND C LYING WITHIN SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 14 EAST, GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA.20179/01/16REF. CASE NO: OV115-027 OV914-008 OV914-007A OV903-03A (O) 15-14SEPTEMBER 2016 SHEET OF 10 OV1601351 CONTOUR INTERVAL: 1' SCALE: AS SHOWN LANDSCAPE BUFFER PLANTING ENLARGEMENT CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR NAKOMA SKY, PHASE 1A & PHASE 1B LOT 1 OF A RESUBDIVISION OF ROONEY RANCH AREA "Z" RECORDED IN BOOK 62, MAPS AND PLATS, PAGE 4, LOTS 1-68 AND COMMON AREAS A,B, AND C LYING WITHIN SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 14 EAST, GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA.20179/01/16REF. CASE NO: OV115-027 OV914-008 OV914-007A OV903-03A (O) 15-14SEPTEMBER 2016 SHEET OF 10 OV1601351 LIGHTING DETAILS OWNER/ DEVELOPER: NAKOMA SKY, LLC 350 East Morningside Green Valley, AZ 85614 Attn: JONI CONDIT Joni@LaPosadaGV.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: TALLEY ASSOCIATES 1925 San Jacinto, Suite 400 Dallas, Texas 75201 Tel. 214-871-7900; Fax. 214-871-7985 ATTN: COY TALLEY ctalley@talleyassociates.com RECREATION AREA PLAN FOR NAKOMA SKY, PHASE 1A & PHASE 1B SHEET 1 OF 4 SEPTEMBER 2016 CONTOUR INTERVAL: 5' SCALE: AS SHOWN REF. CASE NO: OV115-027 OV914-008 OV914-007A OV903-03A (O) 15-14 SHEET INDEX: LOT 1 OF A RESUBDIVISION OF ROONEY RANCH AREA "Z" RECORDED IN BOOK 62, MAPS AND PLATS, PAGE 4, LOTS 1-68 AND COMMON AREAS A,B, AND C LYING WITHIN SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 14 EAST, GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA. APPROVAL ANY PLANT DEEMED SALVAGEABLE BY THE ZONING INSPECTOR SHALL BE SALVAGED. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY NATIVE PLANT SALVAGE PLAN APPROVED BY: PLANNING & ZONING ADMINISTRATOR DATE SHEET 1...........COVER SHEET/ NOTES SHEET 2...........RECREATION AREA PLAN - PRIVATE AMENITY AREA SHEET 3...........RECREATION AREA PLAN - RESIDENTIAL POOL AREA SHEET 4...........RECREATION AREA PLAN - COMMUNITY PARK 20179/01/16OV1601351 LOCATION MAP COVER SHEET GENERAL NOTES RECREATION AREA PLAN FOR NAKOMA SKY, PHASE 1A & PHASE 1B LOT 1 OF A RESUBDIVISION OF ROONEY RANCH AREA "Z" RECORDED IN BOOK 62, MAPS AND PLATS, PAGE 4, LOTS 1-68 AND COMMON AREAS A,B, AND C LYING WITHIN SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 14 EAST, GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA.20179/01/16REF. CASE NO: OV115-027 OV914-008 OV914-007A OV903-03A (O) 15-14SEPTEMBER 2016 SHEET OF 4 OV1601351 CONTOUR INTERVAL: 1' SCALE: AS SHOWN PRIVATE AMENITY AREA PHASE 1A RECREATION EQUIPMENT KEYNOTES RAMADA AND PICNIC TABLES WITH TRASH RECEPTACLE PUBLIC ART 16' MULTI-USE ASPHALT PATH D.G. OVER STABILIZED FIRE ACCESS LANE (3) PUBLIC PARKING SPACES DRINKING FOUNTAIN BIKE RACK BENCH TRAIL CONNECTION WATER HARVESTING BASIN SOIL CEMENT BANK PROTECTION 8' WIDE CONCRETE WALKING TRAIL LABYRINTH DOG PARK VEGETABLE GARDEN OUTDOOR GRILL AREA FUTURE SPLASH PAD RESIDENT PARKING 31 SPACES GOLF CARTS PARKING/ CHARGING STATION RECREATION AREA PLAN FOR NAKOMA SKY, PHASE 1A & PHASE 1B LOT 1 OF A RESUBDIVISION OF ROONEY RANCH AREA "Z" RECORDED IN BOOK 62, MAPS AND PLATS, PAGE 4, LOTS 1-68 AND COMMON AREAS A,B, AND C LYING WITHIN SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 14 EAST, GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA.20179/01/16REF. CASE NO: OV115-027 OV914-008 OV914-007A OV903-03A (O) 15-14SEPTEMBER 2016 SHEET OF 4 OV1601351 CONTOUR INTERVAL: 1' SCALE: AS SHOWN RESIDENTIAL POOL AREA PHASE 1A RECREATION EQUIPMENT KEYNOTES FIRE PIT VILLAGE MAIN COURTYARD MEDITATION LAWN D.G. OVER STABILIZED FIRE ACCESS LANE 5' HT. POOL SAFETY FENCE & GATE FESTIVE STRING LIGHTING FIRE PLACE RESIDENTIAL POOLS CONNECTING WALK FLOWERING VINE TRELLIS YOGA LAWN W/ OVERHEAD SHADE CANOPY WATER FEATURE TRELLIS FIRE BOWLS SPA MEETING ROOMS PRIVACY COURTYARD PRIVACY FENCE OUTDOOR GRILL AREA 5' HT. POOL SAFETY FENCE GOLF CARTS PARKING/ CHARGING STATION POOL DISPLAY SCUPPERS IN WALL PLANTED POTS ON WALL GOLF CART/ PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE ENHANCED PAVING PUBLIC ART IN LOBBY 8' WIDE CONCRETE WALKING TRAIL BENCH 42" HT. SAFETY RAILING RESIDENT COMMUNITY PATIOS RECREATION AREA PLAN FOR NAKOMA SKY, PHASE 1A & PHASE 1B LOT 1 OF A RESUBDIVISION OF ROONEY RANCH AREA "Z" RECORDED IN BOOK 62, MAPS AND PLATS, PAGE 4, LOTS 1-68 AND COMMON AREAS A,B, AND C LYING WITHIN SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 14 EAST, GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA.20179/01/16REF. CASE NO: OV115-027 OV914-008 OV914-007A OV903-03A (O) 15-14SEPTEMBER 2016 SHEET OF 4 OV1601351 CONTOUR INTERVAL: 1' SCALE: AS SHOWN COMMUNITY PARK PHASE 1A RECREATION EQUIPMENT KEYNOTES NATURAL TRAIL, STABILIZED GRAVEL SURFACE PUBLIC ART (INTERACTIVE SCULPTURE) COMMUNITY PARK w/ PLAY STRUCTURES AND SAFETY SURFACE RAMADA AND PICNIC TABLES BENCH DESERT GARDEN GRILL DRINKING FOUNTAIN BIKE RACK LABYRINTH PUBLIC ART MUSICAL PLAYGROUND INSTRUMENT AREA FITNESS STATION & BENCH PUBLIC PARKING 16 SPACES CONCRETE SIDEWALK TRASH RECEPTACLE 3 - 12 YRS PLAY STRUCTURE 13 + YRS CLIMBING STRUCTURE STRETCHING STATION CARDIO STATION CORE STRENGTHENING STATION CANOPY SHADE SAIL SWINGING GATES WITH SIGNAGE SIGNAGE TO STATE 'COMMUNITY PARK IS OPEN TO PUBLIC FROM DAWN TO DUSK' ONE UNISEX FAMILY RESTROOM © three 2016sep 07, 2016page 2Nakoma Sky CCRCoro valley, arizona Notes:• All roof drains will be externally architecturally integrated with the building.• All balconies associated with units may be screened; Screening material is noted on the Ma-terials Board.© three 2016sep 07, 2016page 3Nakoma Sky CCRCoro valley, arizonaview from southeast - perspecƟ ve A Notes:• All roof drains will be externally architecturally integrated with the building.• All balconies associated with units may be screened; Screening material is noted on the Ma-terials Board.© three 2016sep 07, 2016page 4Nakoma Sky CCRCoro valley, arizonaarrival view from southeast - perspecƟ ve B Notes:• All roof drains will be externally architecturally integrated with the building.• All balconies associated with units may be screened; Screening material is noted on the Ma-terials Board.© three 2016sep 07, 2016page 5Nakoma Sky CCRCoro valley, arizonaview of residenƟ al units at ends of wings - perspecƟ ve C Notes:• All roof drains will be externally architecturally integrated with the building.• All balconies associated with units may be screened; Screening material is noted on the Ma-terials Board.© three 2016sep 07, 2016page 6Nakoma Sky CCRCoro valley, arizonaview of residenƟ al units at the end of the central wing - perspecƟ ve D Notes:• Pool fencing will meet required Town codes. Final pool fencing material is not determined.• All roof drains will be externally architecturally integrated with the building.• All balconies associated with units may be screened; Screening material is noted on the Ma-terials Board.© three 2016sep 07, 2016page 7Nakoma Sky CCRCoro valley, arizonaview of arƟ sans village and commons - perspecƟ ve E Notes:• All roof drains will be externally architecturally integrated with the building.• All balconies associated with units may be screened; Screening material is noted on the Ma-terials Board.• Covered Parking may be provided for the ground-level parking.© three 2016sep 07, 2016page 8Nakoma Sky CCRCoro valley, arizonaview of arrival court - perspecƟ ve F Notes:• All roof drains will be externally architecturally integrated with the building.• All balconies associated with units may be screened; Screening material is noted on the Ma-terials Board.• Covered Parking may be provided for the ground-level parking.© three 2016sep 07, 2016page 9Nakoma Sky CCRCoro valley, arizonaview of ﬁ ve story residenƟ al building - perspecƟ ve G Notes:• All roof drains will be externally architecturally integrated with the building.• All balconies associated with units may be screened; Screening material is noted on the Ma-terials Board.© three 2016sep 07, 2016page 10Nakoma Sky CCRCoro valley, arizonaview of indoor pool building and courtyard - perspecƟ ve H © three 2016sep 07, 2016page 11Nakoma Sky CCRCoro valley, arizonaview of west garage building - perspecƟ ve J ENLARGED ELEVATIONS AND MATERIAL SAMPLES© three 2016sep 07, 2016page 12Nakoma Sky CCRCoro valley, arizona ENLARGED TYPICAL ELEVATION WITH CALLED MATERIALS (commons area)© three 2016sep 07, 2016page 13Nakoma Sky CCRCoro valley, arizona ENLARGED TYPICAL ELEVATION WITH CALLED MATERIALS (typical residenƟ al area)© three 2016sep 07, 2016page 14Nakoma Sky CCRCoro valley, arizona © three 2016sep 07, 2016page 15Nakoma Sky CCRCoro valley, arizona SITE CROSS-SECTIONS AND BUILDING CROSS SECTIONS© three 2016sep 07, 2016page 16Nakoma Sky CCRCoro valley, arizona © three 2016sep 07, 2016page 17Nakoma Sky CCRCoro valley, arizona © three 2016sep 07, 2016page 18Nakoma Sky CCRCoro valley, arizonaproject secƟ on/building elevaƟ on Aproject secƟ on/building elevaƟ on Bproject secƟ on/building elevaƟ on C building secƟ on Fbuilding secƟ on D building secƟ on E© three 2016sep 07, 2016page 19Nakoma Sky CCRCoro valley, arizona ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS© three 2016sep 07, 2016page 20Nakoma Sky CCRCoro valley, arizona © three 2016sep 07, 2016page 21Nakoma Sky CCRCoro valley, arizona © three 2016sep 07, 2016page 22Nakoma Sky CCRCoro valley, arizona © three 2016sep 07, 2016page 23Nakoma Sky CCRCoro valley, arizona © three 2016sep 07, 2016page 24Nakoma Sky CCRCoro valley, arizona © three 2016sep 07, 2016page 25Nakoma Sky CCRCoro valley, arizona © three 2016sep 07, 2016page 26Nakoma Sky CCRCoro valley, arizona © three 2016sep 07, 2016page 27Nakoma Sky CCRCoro valley, arizona © three 2016sep 07, 2016page 28Nakoma Sky CCRCoro valley, arizona © three 2016sep 07, 2016page 29Nakoma Sky CCRCoro valley, arizona © three 2016sep 07, 2016page 30Nakoma Sky CCRCoro valley, arizona © three 2016sep 07, 2016page 31Nakoma Sky CCRCoro valley, arizona FLOOR PLANS© three 2016sep 07, 2016page 32Nakoma Sky CCRCoro valley, arizona level 0© three 2016sep 07, 2016page 33Nakoma Sky CCRCoro valley, arizona level 1© three 2016sep 07, 2016page 34Nakoma Sky CCRCoro valley, arizona level 2© three 2016sep 07, 2016page 35Nakoma Sky CCRCoro valley, arizona level 1level 3level 1© three 2016sep 07, 2016page 36Nakoma Sky CCRCoro valley, arizona level 2level 4evel 2© three 2016sep 07, 2016page 37Nakoma Sky CCRCoro valley, arizona level 5© three 2016sep 07, 2016page 38Nakoma Sky CCRCoro valley, arizona Prepared By Talley & Associates 1925 San Jacinto Suite 400 Dallas, TX 75201 Contact Person: Robert G. Longaker III, PLA, AICP The WLB Group, Inc. 4444 E. Broadway Blvd. Tucson, AZ 85711 (520) 881-7480 Thematic Details Package August 19, 2016 This Thematic Details Package has been prepared to demonstrate the character of certain components of the project, including the entries off 1st Avenue, site lighting and furniture. Additionally, this package responds to planning comments received from the CSP 1st Submittal Review and from the project pre- application meeting. This package addresses comment #3 in the June 27, 2016 CSP 1st Submittal Review Planning comments letter from the Town of Oro Valley in response to the 1st submittal of the CSP, and in response to requirements outlined in the Nakoma Sky PAD. This package addresses the following (comment #3): “The Thematic Details Package needs to be amended to meet the Planned Area Development (PAD) requirement to accentuate building and project entrances with landscaping, specifically from both entrances on 1st Avenue and at the project gates. Provide plan view of entrances and project gate areas with a landscaping concept which meets this PAD requirement. Although not formally required, it is also suggested that the thematic package be improved with regard to wall details, lighting standards, bench details and other thematic elements throughout the project which have the effect of creating a unified theme for the project.” This package also addresses comment #15 in the April 26, 2016 comment letter from the Town of Oro Valley in response to the project pre-application meeting held on April 22, 2016. This package addresses the following (comment #15): “Provide thematic details including entry features, signage, light fixtures, benches and other thematic elements which will tie the development together. Particular areas of focus include the two main entry points off 1st Avenue which provide a significant opportunity for project identity and to create a sense of arrival. Provide an entry detail which meets these goals.” Project Entrances: The attached renderings show the entry monument proposed for the primary entrance to the site at the intersection of 1st Avenue and Lambert Lane. Additional plan view details show the primary entrances on 1st Avenue and at the project gate areas. The plan view details illustrate a landscaping concept and highlight entrance features. Project Lighting The following is a description of the lighting that is anticipated to be used within the project: (See the project lighting attachment for imagery)  Roadway pole lighting.  Pedestrian light poles (approximately 10’ in height)  Accent tree down-lighting.  Pathway lighting.  Festive style string lighting in some outdoor dining and fire pit courtyard areas. Project Furniture: The following is a description of the furniture that is anticipated to be used within the project: (See the project furniture attachment for imagery)  Concrete benches in public areas (backs and tops of benches could incorporate artwork for public art opportunities).  Concrete picnic tables and seating in public areas.  Residential style outdoor seating with cushions and side tables/coffee tables in private courtyard areas.  Café style outdoor seating in private outdoor dining areas.  Some folding/stackable seating and tables for outdoor event spaces in private courtyard areas. Project Signage: The signage located in the interior areas of the project will be designed with a common theme and contain materials and colors that are reflective of the buildings on the site. These signs have not yet been designed and details will be provided in a Master Sign Program that will be developed for the project in conformance with Chapter 28 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised. PROJECT ENTRY AT 1ST AVENUE AND LAMBERT LANE1ST AVENUE GATE AT MAIN ENTRY NEAR 1ST AVENUE AND LAMBERT LANE PROJECT ENTRY NORTH1ST AVENUE Street Lighting Step lighting Trellis Downlighting PROJECT LIGHTING Pedestrian Lighting Street Lighting Path Lighting PROJECT LIGHTING Downlighting Downlighting Downlighting Downlighting Metal Bench Recycled Plastic Wood Bench PROJECT FURNITURE GENERAL PLAN NAKOMA SKY (OV1601351) Attachment 6 ZONING MAP NAKOMA SKY (OV1601351) Attachment 7 Attachment 9 Grading Exception Analysis Nakoma Sky OV1601351 The Zoning Code requires Grading Exceptions to be evaluated in accordance with the following findings (shown in italics, following by staff comment). Findings: Applications for Grading Exceptions shall address each of the below findings. The Conceptual Design Review Board (CDRB) will review and provide recommendation to the Town Council on all applications for grading exceptions at scheduled public hearings. When reviewing requests for grading exceptions, the Conceptual Design Review Board and Town Council shall consider each of the findings and address them in their deliberations. To grant an exception, Town Council shall find that the request addresses the concerns with each finding and is in substantial conformance with the findings as a whole. i. The exception meets the intent and purpose of this code; ii. Granting the exception constitutes the minimum to allow the improvement; iii. The conditions on the property are unique such that strict adherence to this section would cause an unnecessary hardship which substantially limits the preservation and enjoyment of property rights; iv. The exception imposes conditions so as to not constitute granting of a special privilege; and v. That the exception will not be materially detrimental to person’s residing in the vicinity, to adjacent property, to the neighborhood or the public welfare in general. i. The exception meets the intent and purpose of this Code: Intent The regulations, as set forth in this ordinance, have been prepared in the context of Oro Valley’s specific desert environment. They are intended to compliment the applicable provisions of the Hillside Development Zone and the Floodplain Management Ordinance, and not to authorize any grading activity prohibited by this ordinance or any Town ordinance. The intent of this grading ordinance is to assure that the design and implementation of all grading projects shall: 1. Avoid scarring and other adverse visual impacts resulting from cut, fill and any other type of ground disturbance; and Nakoma Sky Grading Exception Staff Analysis – Attachment 9 Page 2 of 4 2. Blend with the natural contours of the land; and 3. Restrict the areas of disturbance and volume of material displaced to the minimum necessary to implement the planned development; and 4. Limit mass grading to residential subdivisions with an average lot size of 15,000 square feet or less; and 5. Employ measures that: a. Ensure that graded hillside, slopes or other areas subject to erosion are stabilized; and b. Reduce the erosion effects of storm water discharge, preserve the flood carrying capacity of natural or constructed waterways by limiting soil loss, and protect drainageways from siltation; and c. Minimize dust pollution and surface water drainage from graded areas during grading development; and d. Ensure that proposed development activity is designed and implemented to avoid adverse impacts and appropriate restorative measures; and e. Encourage phased projects, to preserve natural contours and vegetative communities until such time as grading must be necessarily occur on-site. Staff Comment: The location of a majority of the cut slopes are interior to the site which are limited in visibility due to existing topography, building location and distance from adjoining properties. The applicant is required by the Zoning Code to meet requirements designed to minimize scarring and blend the resulting site contours to reflect the natural topography. Conditions has been included requiring areas of cut to be treated with a restorative aging chemical to minimize the visual impact of any exposed cuts, revegetate, recontour the land to mimic existing topography and treat any areas graded for future development with methods to control dust. Additionally, the proposed exception areas are the minimum necessary to implement the proposed land plan. A significant percentage of the site (44%) is proposed to remain in natural state. Building areas have been concentrated to the greatest extent possible to limit the impact on the natural environmental features of the land, which include hillside areas and two sensitive washes Purpose The purpose of the ordinance is to provide for the public health, safety and welfare and to protect and preserve the aesthetics of the natural environment through regulation of all types of excavation and earthwork on private and public land. The grading regulations contained in this ordinance are designed to: Nakoma Sky Grading Exception Staff Analysis – Attachment 9 Page 3 of 4 1. Regulate the development of potentially hazardous terrain; and 2. Preserve, where possible, or recreate the natural contours, the native vegetation and the visual character of the site in harmony with the surrounding terrain; and 3. Enhance the quality and value of new development; and 4. Maintain property rights and property values of adjacent developed and undeveloped parcels. Staff Comment: The applicant is required to conform with existing grading ordinance provisions and must restore the contours of the land to recreate existing contours and revegetate areas of disturbance. The exception will promote the efficient use of the land by providing for the concentration of development areas, resulting in conservation of a significant portions of the site in its natural state, including hillside areas and the two sensitive wash corridors through the site. ii. Granting the exception constitutes the minimum to allow the improvement; Staff Comment: The exception is the minimum necessary to allow improvement of the land. The northern access road is imperative to providing for efficient circulation through the site to efficiently distribute traffic and to provide convenient access for emergency vehicles. Buildings have been concentrated to the greatest extent feasible to minimize the extent of the exception requested and to provide for the conservation of a significant portion of the site in natural condition. The cut slope at the northeastern portion of the garage is minimal and will accommodate a two story garage, limiting surface parking which would have a larger impact on the natural land. iii. The conditions on the property are unique such that strict adherence to this section would cause an unnecessary hardship which substantially limits the preservation and enjoyment of property rights; Staff Comment: The exception is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of property rights. The exception is necessary to meet engineering standards for a safe intersection at Lambert Lane. The exception related to the northern access roadway is necessary to provide two points of access to the development for traffic dispersion and to meet public safety access requirements. The excess fill request for the main campus buildings and the cut request for the parking structure enables building areas to be concentrated, reducing the impact on the natural features of the property. iv. The exception imposes conditions so as to not constitute granting of a special privilege; and Staff Comment: The exception approval includes conditions requiring adherence to all other requirements of the Grading Ordinance including recontouring of property to mimic existing topography, treatment with a restorative aging agent for restoration purposes and revegetation of slopes to match existing native plant dispersion. Nakoma Sky Grading Exception Staff Analysis – Attachment 9 Page 4 of 4 v. That the exception will not be materially detrimental to person’s residing in the vicinity, to adjacent property, to the neighborhood or the public welfare in general. Staff Comment: Based on the distance from adjacent properties and roadways and intervening hillside areas, visibility of the areas of cut and fill will be minimal and will not be detrimental to adjacent properties. The exception near 1st Avenue will backfill against the existing slope for 1st Avenue and will not be visible from the existing roadway. Conditions have been included to require restoration of all cut and fill areas to reflect natural conditions. Attachment 10 Design Principles Analysis Nakoma Sky Senior Living Facility OV1601351 The Site Plan, Landscape plan and Architecture Plans have been evaluated and conform to the Design Principles and applicable Design Standards of the Zoning Code. Listed below are Design Principles (italics) followed by staff comments. Conceptual Site Design i. Building Orientation: the location, orientation and size of structures shall promote a complementary relationship of structures to one another. The location and orientation of buildings was a primarily consideration during development and approval of the Tentative Development Plan. As a result, buildings were carefully planned in specific locations which use the hillsides on the property to reduce visual impacts to adjoining properties and from public roadways, primarily 1st Avenue and residential areas to the west and from planned residential properties to the north. Building locations were concentrated to provide a proximate location between residents and support services for convenience and resulted in less impact to the natural features on the property. ii. Drainage/Grading: site grading shall minimize impacts on natural grade and landforms and provide for subtle transitions of architectural elements to grade. Significant cuts and fills in relation to natural grade shall be avoided or minimized to the extent practical given property constraints. The primary focus of the review of the Grading Exception focused on ensuring the exception requested was the minimal necessary to provide for the efficient use of the property and ensuring the exception would have minimal impact to visibility from public roadways and adjoining properties. Based on staff analysis, the proposed exception is necessary for reasonable access to the site and to support concentrated building areas, which will have a reduced effect on the natural areas of the site. Additionally, the exception is limited to areas with limited visibility from adjacent roadways and properties and therefore will not result in a negative impact to surrounding areas. iii. Connectivity: strengthen the usability and connectivity of the pedestrian environment internally and externally by enhancing access to the public street Nakoma Sky Attachment 10 Design Principle Analysis Page 2 of 3 system, transit, adjoining development and pedestrian and bicycle transportation routes. Where appropriate, buildings and uses should provide access to adjacent open space and recreational areas. A primary focus of the review was to ensure an interconnected system of sidewalks, paths and trails serving the development and connected to the larger pedestrian and bicycle network in the area. Building locations were planned with convenient and proximate access to the trails and paths system in the area for recreational opportunities for facility residents. b. Conceptual Architectural Design i. Design: building architectural design shall be appropriate for the climate and characteristics of the Sonoran Desert, including indigenous and traditional textures, colors, and shapes found in and around Oro Valley. All development shall maintain and strengthen the high quality of design exemplified in Oro Valley through project creativity and design excellence. The building design was a primary focus during the rezoning case for the property. As a result a number of zoning conditions were included to require an architectural concept which was more consistent with the area and to increase the level of design to meet the high quality of design exemplified in Oro Valley. The architectural concept was improved and meets this Design Principle. ii. Scale, Height and Mass: building scale, height and mass shall be consistent with the Town-approved intensity of the site, designated scenic corridors, and valued mountain views. Buildings shall be designed to respect the scale of adjoining areas and should mitigate the negative and functional impacts that arise from scale, bulk and mass. A primary focus with the review was ensuring that architectural techniques were incorporated into the building architecture which had the effect of reducing the overall perceived height and mass of the buildings. As part of the rezoning case, a number of architectural techniques were established which would reduce the overall appearance of building mass and the resulting elevations reflect variation in building heights, roof and wall planes, materials and colors. The proposed architecture is consistent with the techniques identified as part of the rezoning. Nakoma Sky Attachment 10 Design Principle Analysis Page 3 of 3 iii. Facade Articulation: all building facades shall be fully articulated, including variation in building massing, roof planes, wall planes, and surface articulation. Architectural elements including, but not limited to, overhangs, trellises, projections, awnings, insets, material, and texture shall be used to create visual interest that contributes to a building’s character. Staff has reviewed the proposed changes and finds that the proposed changes are consistent with the rezoning conditions of approval and the direction received at the CDRB study session. Additionally, the project was reviewed and is consistent with the Town’s Design Principles and applicable Design Standards. Primary elements of this analysis include reductions in the overall mass of buildings through the use of façade articulation, roof and wall plane variations, material and color variation and other techniques to create visual interest. iv. Signs: sign colors, design and placement shall be complementary and integral to the project’s architectural and site design themes. Signs will be considered under a separate Master Sign Program. The Thematic Details Package contains main project signage which will establish a unfied development theme for the project. v. Screening: building design and screening strategies shall be implemented to conceal the view of loading areas, refuse enclosures, mechanical equipment, appurtenances, and utilities from adjacent public streets and neighborhoods. Walls and landscaping have been provided in locations that provide appropriate screening of loading and service areas for the development. vi. Communication Towers: wireless communication facilities shall be located in areas and designed in a manner which reduces the visual impact on the proposed project and surrounding area. Not applicable November 2015 Modified Architectural Concept Attachment 11 Proposed Architectural Concept Attachment 12 Conceptual Design Review Board Staff Report PROJECT: Nakoma Sky Senior Living Facility CASE NUMBER: OV1601351 MEETING DATE: September 20, 2016 AGENDA ITEM: 4A, 4B and 4C STAFF CONTACT: Chad Daines cdaines@orovalleyaz.gov (520) 229-4896 Applicant: The WLB Group Inc., Robert Longaker Request: Multi-use senior care facility on 79 acres involving the following elements:  Grading Exception  Conceptual Site Plan  Landscape Plan  Recreation Area Plan  Architecture Location: Southeast corner of Naranja Drive and 1st Avenue Recommendation: Recommend approval, subject to conditions in Attachment 1 SUMMARY: The purpose of this agenda item is to consider the Grading Exception, Conceptual Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Recreation Area Plan and Architecture for the Nakoma Sky Senior Living Facility on 79 acres at the southeast corner of Naranja and 1st Avenue (Attachment 2). The planned facility is comprised of a main campus of buildings for independent living apartments, assisted living and memory care units, support services and private recreational amenities to serve residents of the facility. A trailhead and community park area are also planned as part of the first phase of development. Additional independent living units (in detached single-family format) and a commercial area / welcome center at the Lambert Lane and 1st Avenue intersection are planned for future phases of the development. Attachment 14 OV1601351 Nakoma Sky Senior Living Facility Page 2 of 11 Conceptual Design Review Board Staff Report A key issue with the review of the application was to ensure buildings were placed in locations identified during the rezoning case which minimized visual impact. The property was rezoned to Planned Area Development (PAD) in 2014 and amended in 2015. As part of the rezoning and subsequent amendment, significant attention was focused on the location and building mass of the proposed five story building. The visual impact of the building was assessed from all vantage points around the property using visual simulations and an extensive site tour. As a result, buildings were carefully planned in specific locations which use the hillsides on the property to reduce visual impacts to adjoining properties and from public roadways, primarily 1st Avenue and residential areas to the west and from planned residential properties to the north. The Tentative Development Plan approved as a part of the rezoning is provided on Attachment 3. A second key issue was ensuring that architectural techniques were incorporated into the building architecture which had the effect of reducing the overall perceived height and mass of the buildings. Based on the height and mass of the proposed buildings, the rezoning conditions focused on methods to minimize the visual massing of the building. These rezoning conditions, provided in Attachment 4, required building height variation including building step downs at the ends of buildings, wall and roof plane variation, material and color variation and landscaped terraces to reduce the overall visual impact of the buildings. The conditions established that the Conceptual Design Review Board and Town Council would determine the extent of mitigation required. The resulting elevations reflect the intended variation in building heights, roof and wall planes, materials and colors. The applicant’s submittal (Attachment 5) is consistent with the building locations approved as part of the Tentative Development Plan and the architectural conditions adopted as part of the rezoning. BACKGROUND: Zoning/Land Use Context The property is bounded by 1st Avenue on the west, planned large lot residential to the north and the Cañada de Oro wash to the south. Large lot residential exists to the west across 1st Avenue. Commercial development including the Home Depot shopping center and the Steam Pump Ranch exists to the east across the CDO wash (Attachment 2). The property is designated Master Planned Community and the zoning is Nakoma Sky Planned Area Development which support the proposed land uses. The general plan and zoning are depicted on Attachments 6 and 7 respectively. Attachment 14 OV1601351 Nakoma Sky Senior Living Facility Page 3 of 11 Conceptual Design Review Board Staff Report Site Conditions:  79 acres  Vacant property including hillside areas and several wash corridors Approvals to Date:  1989: Rezoning to Rooney Ranch Planned Area Development (PAD). A mix of uses, including office, retail, multi-family residential and single-family residential  2005: Final Plat and Grading Exception approved for 68-lot subdivision  2014: Rezoning to Nakoma Sky Planned Area Development and Minor General Plan Amendment to clarify non-applicability of single-family policy  2015 Planned Area Development Amendment to modify the Tentative Development Plan and architectural concept Proposed Improvements:  224 Senior Apartment Units  24 Assisted Living Units  24 Memory Care Units  64 Independent Living Units  Community open space and trailhead  Future commercial parcel and welcome center DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS: This section of the report is divided into the components of the application; Grading Exception, Conceptual Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Recreation Area Plan and Architecture. Grading Exception (Item 4A): The primary focus of the review of the Grading Exception focused on ensuring the exception requested was the minimal necessary to provide for the efficient use of the property and ensuring the exception would have minimal impact to visibility from public roadways and adjoining properties. Based on staff analysis, the proposed exception is necessary for reasonable access to the site and to support concentrated building areas, which will have a reduced effect on the natural areas of the site. Additionally, the exception is limited to areas with limited visibility from adjacent roadways and properties and therefore will not result in a negative impact to surrounding areas. The Zoning Code establishes limitations on the heights of cuts and fills proposed within a development. The maximum height of any cut or fill cannot exceed 12 feet, unless a Grading Exception is granted by Town Council, following recommendation of the Conceptual Design Review Board. The applicant has submitted a Grading Exception application, which is provided as Attachment 8. Attachment 14 OV1601351 Nakoma Sky Senior Living Facility Page 4 of 11 Conceptual Design Review Board Staff Report A grading exception was previously granted on this property related to the 68 lot single-family residential subdivision approved in 2005. This 2005 grading exception was relative to the average lot size of the subdivision and the allowance for mass grading, which is not applicable to the current request. The Grading Exception requested by the applicant involves increasing the height of fill and increasing the depth of cuts and is limited to four areas of the site as follows: 1st Avenue and Lambert Lane: This area is 10-15 feet below the existing grade of 1st Avenue. The request would allow this area to be raised with fill 6 to16 feet to match the grade of 1st Avenue Northern Access Road: Approximately 100 feet of this roadway will be within several 9 to16.5 foot cuts through the ridge of an existing hill to provide project access to the northern portion of the development. Apartment and Memory Care Building: This portion of the site will be raised with fill 6 to 16 feet to provide for a level building pad. Parking Garage to West of Apartment building: A small portion of the northwest corner of the parking structure will require a 12 to 16.5 foot cut through an adjacent hillside. The Zoning Code provides evaluative criteria which must be met, supporting a grading exception. In summary, the criteria of the Zoning Code has been met and the Grading Exception is supported by staff, based on the following:  The grading exception is limited in scope to allow for the efficient use of the site given the existing topography.  Most areas of exception are internal to the site with limited or no significant visibility from public roadways and adjoining properties.  The primary intent of the grading ordinance is met, which is to minimize impact to adjacent properties. A detailed analysis of the Grading Exception in relation to the evaluative criteria of the Zoning Code is provided on Attachment 9. A condition is included in Attachment 1 identifying the specific exceptions to be granted. A condition is also provided requiring treatment of cut and fill areas to restore the natural appearance including use of restorative agent, revegetation and recontouring of graded areas to mimic natural conditions and a requirement for a protective dust control method to cover graded areas for future development. Conceptual Site Plan (Item 4B): The primary focus of site plan review was to ensure buildings were placed in locations which minimized visual impact. During the rezoning, building locations were carefully planned to utilize hillsides on the property to shield and minimize visibility from street Attachment 14 OV1601351 Nakoma Sky Senior Living Facility Page 5 of 11 Conceptual Design Review Board Staff Report frontages and from residential properties to the west and planned residential north of the site. The proposed site plan reflects the building locations which were carefully planned and adopted as part of the rezoning case. The property includes a number of hillside areas which minimize view of the interior portions of the property from 1st Avenue. Significant attention was focused during the rezoning case to ensure that the hillside areas of the site were utilized in a manner that reduced the visual impact of the height and mass of the proposed buildings, particularly the five story building. As a result, the taller buildings on the site are proposed on the south and east side of the hillside areas, which limit visibility from 1st Avenue and residential properties to the west and planned residential areas north of the site. The proposed site plan is consistent with the approved Tentative Development Plan adopted as part of the rezoning case. Sidewalks, Trails and Multi-use Paths The site plan provides for an inter-connected system of sidewalks and multi-use paths serving all areas of the development. A multi-use path system and public trailhead will be constructed along the CDO wash in conformance with PAD and Pima County trails standards. The multi- use path system will be extended through the site to 1st Avenue. A public trail is proposed along the eastern wash through the site, providing for pedestrian and equestrian access from the CDO wash area to the planned trail system to the north of the property. A condition is included in Attachment 1 requiring dedication of a public trail easement for this public trail as part of the final plat. Transit Stop The PAD and Zoning Code require a transit stop to be constructed on 1st Avenue. The applicant has proposed phasing of the transit stop to occur in conjunction with the future commercial development, or at the time transit service is extended to this area, whichever occurs first. As the area is not currently served by transit, staff supports the phasing of the transit stop and a condition is included in Attachment 1 to address this issue. Senior Care Requirements In 2015, Town Council adopted new requirements for senior care uses. These requirements include standards for separated pedestrian access ways to parking areas, covered parking and drop off areas and a resident access plan to ensure buildings and services are within close proximity for resident convenience. The plan provides the covered parking and drop off areas, consistent with these new requirements. The resident access plan was also reviewed and meets the intent of the Zoning Code to provide a proximate relationship between buildings and services for facility residents. In terms of separated pedestrian access ways to parking areas, the site plan contains a parking structure immediately west of the apartment building. Pedestrian access ways are Attachment 14 OV1601351 Nakoma Sky Senior Living Facility Page 6 of 11 Conceptual Design Review Board Staff Report provided to the second level of the parking structure as required by the Zoning Code. As the lower level of the parking structure is primarily restricted to valet parking, the applicant has requested a waiver as enabled by the Zoning Code based on the function of this parking area. The applicant has also requested a waiver from the requirement for the parking structure to the north of the apartment building as this structure is primarily for employee parking. Based on these factors, staff is supportive of the waivers requested and reference to the waiver is incorporated into the motion and included as a condition in Attachment 1 relative to this issue. The site plan is consistent with the new requirements for senior care uses. Environmental Sensitive Lands The property contains a number of sensitive environmental features regulated by the Environmental Sensitive Lands section of the Zoning Code. These features include several wash corridors which traverse the site north to south and hillsides throughout the property. The proposed site plan exceeds Town requirements for Environmentally Sensitive Open Space. The Zoning Code requires 25 acres (31% of site) to be conserved as open space and the proposed site plan conserves 35 acres (44% of the site) as open space. Ninety five percent of the internal wash corridors are conserved, in compliance with Zoning Code requirements. The site plan has been reviewed and is consistent with the hillside requirements of the Environmentally Sensitive Lands section of the Zoning Code. A cultural resource survey has been submitted which identifies several minor archeological sites on the property. The survey confirms that no additional study or treatment plan is recommended for these minor sites. Design Principles: The site plan has been reviewed and is consistent with the adopted Design Principles and applicable Design Standards. Key principals include building orientation and location and designing the site with respect to topography and natural features. A detailed analysis of the site plan in relation to the Design Principles is provided in Attachment 10. Conceptual Landscape Plan (Item 4B): The landscape plan provides for landscaped roadways and enhanced project entries along 1st Avenue and within the development as required by the PAD zoning standards. Additionally, the landscape concept provides for appropriate screening of service areas and loading zones. The applicant has also provided a thematic details package which defines elements related to wall design, lighting standards, project signage and bench standards. This thematic package will ensure a unified development as the project is constructed. Attachment 14 OV1601351 Nakoma Sky Senior Living Facility Page 7 of 11 Conceptual Design Review Board Staff Report Recreational Area Plan (Item 4B): The primary focus of the Recreation Area Plan review was to ensure that the community park and trailhead provide an appropriate level of amenities as depicted on the Tentative Development Plan adopted as part of the rezoning application. As part of the rezoning, the applicant proposed a community park area and trailhead to be open to Town residents. As the community park and trailhead will be open to the public, a concept plan was reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board (PRAB) who provided a recommendation of conditional approval based on the level of recreational amenities proposed. The applicant’s submittal (Attachment 4) includes a Recreational Area Plan which was revised to incorporate all recreational amenities as recommended by PRAB. This plan has been reviewed and exceeds the recreational area and amenity requirements of the Zoning Code. The proposed trailhead and multi-use path along the interior of the project and along the CDO wash area will be constructed with the first phase of development. The applicant has proposed phasing of the community park area, with construction to occur within three years of issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the first phase of construction. The restroom is proposed to be constructed when the sewer line is built to serve the adjacent independent living neighborhood east of the community park. Staff supports the proposed phasing of the community park amenities based on the fact that the first phase of construction will include the trailhead, multi-use paths and private amenities, which exceed Zoning Code minimum acreage and amenity requirements based on the number of units to be constructed in the first phase. A condition addressing the community park phasing is included in Attachment 1. A condition is also included on Attachment 1 requiring dedication of a public access easement for the community park and trailhead as part of the Final Plat. Conceptual Architecture (Item 4C): A primary focus with the review was ensuring that techniques were incorporated which had the effect of reducing the overall perceived height and mass of the buildings. As part of the rezoning case, a number of architectural techniques were established which would reduce the overall appearance of building mass and the resulting elevations reflect variation in building heights, roof and wall planes, materials and colors. The proposed architecture is consistent with the techniques identified as part of the rezoning. The original architectural concept approved in January 2015 as part of the rezoning consisted of primarily a single five story building with step downs at the ends of the structure. In November 2015, Town Council approved a modified architectural concept which broke the single structure into multiple buildings of varying heights (Attachment 11). A composite elevation of the currently proposed architectural plan is provided as Attachment 12 for comparative purposes. As part of the rezoning approval, conditions were added to require the Attachment 14 OV1601351 Nakoma Sky Senior Living Facility Page 8 of 11 Conceptual Design Review Board Staff Report architecture to be improved to incorporate techniques to deemphasize the mass and reduce the visual impact of the buildings (Attachment 3). These architectural techniques are summarized as follows:  Building height variation, including step downs at ends of the buildings  Roof plane variation  Wall plane variation  Material and color variation  Landscaped terraces on multiple levels of the buildings The rezoning conditions established that the Conceptual Design Review Board and Town Council would determine the extent of mitigation required. On August 9th, the Conceptual Design Review Board discussed this project. At the conclusion of the study session, a board member expressed concern that the color and material changes on the elevations were too busy. Based on that input, the applicant has proposed modified elevations which include the following changes:  Removes landscaping on the balconies of the upper floors of the building. Landscape terraces are still provided in public areas and gathering spaces such as the restaurant area  Reduces the depth of the faux colonnades  Removes the faux wood material from some areas internal to the site  Changes several colors on the color palette to warmer tones Rezoning Conditions and Design Principles Staff has reviewed the proposed changes and finds that the proposed changes are consistent with the rezoning conditions of approval and the direction received at the CDRB study session. A detailed analysis of the proposed architecture in relation to the rezoning conditions is provided within the August 9th CDRB staff report (Attachment 13) and the draft CDRB minutes are provided as Attachment 14. Additionally, the project was reviewed and is consistent with the Town’s Design Principles and applicable Design Standards. Primary elements of this analysis include reductions in the overall mass of buildings and the use of façade articulation to create visual interest. A detailed analysis of the architecture in relation to the Design Principles is provided on Attachment 10. Public Art The applicant is has been working with staff and the Tucson Pima Art Council in the development of a comprehensive art proposal through a call to artists process. Although the public art proposal is not part of this current request before the Board, appropriate locations have been identified and are included on the Landscape Plan for future public art pieces. These locations are highly visible and include appropriate locations at main project entries, Attachment 14 OV1601351 Nakoma Sky Senior Living Facility Page 9 of 11 Conceptual Design Review Board Staff Report within the community park and trailhead area and within the main lobby for the apartment building. Engineering Traffic: The proposed Nakoma Sky development is served by two access points on 1st Avenue. The primary access point is the signalized intersection of 1st Avenue and Lambert Lane and the secondary access point is located approximately ¼ mile north of the intersection of 1st Avenue and Lambert Lane. This secondary access point is a full access non signalized intersection that allows for traffic movements in all directions. The projected daily traffic generation of the Nakoma Sky development is very low. The surrounding roadway network will continue to operate under capacity with an acceptable level of service. Drainage: Existing storm water runoff flows through the site largely in a southeasterly direction. A smaller portion of the site flows through the site in a southwesterly direction to existing drainage structures at 1st Avenue. The drainage system for the proposed development has been designed to meet the Town’s Drainage Criteria Manual and Floodplain Ordinance requirements. Stormwater runoff will be conveyed by surface run-off, drainage channels, and storm drain systems throughout the development. Post-developed discharge locations will be required to match pre-developed discharge locations to mimic existing patterns. It is anticipated that a detention waiver will be requested for this project given its close proximity to the Canyon Del Oro Wash. It must be demonstrated during the analysis of the drainage that there will be no impact downstream as a result of the detention waiver. The detention waiver request is subject to approval by the Town Engineer based on the analysis provided. A request of this type is not uncommon for projects that are located within a close proximity to a regional watercourse. Furthermore, the development is constructing bank protection along the Canyon Del Oro Wash and will be filing a map revision with FEMA to remove southeastern portion of the property from the floodplain. Grading: A Type 2 Grading Permit is required to construct the utilities, parking, and any other structures requiring grading on the project site. The grading represented within the Conceptual Site Plan conform’s to the requirements of the Nakoma Sky PAD and applicable sections of the Town’s Zoning Code (Section 27.9) and the Town’s Subdivision Street Standards, with the exception of maximum cut and fill limits established by the Zonign Code. Accordingly, the applicant has requested a grading exception, which is supported by Engineering staff based on the analysis provided in Attachment 9. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Attachment 14 OV1601351 Nakoma Sky Senior Living Facility Page 10 of 11 Conceptual Design Review Board Staff Report Numerous neighborhood meetings were held in conjunction with the rezoning case for this development. These neighborhood meetings included an extensive on-site tour of the proposed building heights, where area residents were invited and participated in viewing the proposed building heights from all vantage points around the property. These neighborhood meetings exceeded Town requirements for public participation. As there are no substantial changes proposed to the development concept considered as part of the rezoning and there were no outstanding neighborhood issues related to the rezoning application, the Zoning Code does not require additional neighborhood meetings during the design phase of the project. After public notice was provided for this hearing, most comments received from area residents focused on when the facility will be open. One email was received relative to emergency planning in the event of catastrophic incident (Attachment 15). RECOMMENDATION Based on the following findings:  The request is consistent with the Nakoma Sky Planned Area Development  The request is consistent with the Design Principles and applicable Design Standards  The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board has recommended approval of the Recreational Area Plan It is recommended the Board take the following action: Recommend approval to Town Council of the Nakoma Sky Senior Living Facility Grading Exception, Conceptual Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Architecture and Recreation Area Plan, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1. SUGGESTED MOTIONS (Grading Exception Item 4A): I MOVE to recommend approval to Town Council of the Nakoma Sky Senior Living Facility Grading Exception, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1. OR I MOVE to recommend denial to Town Council of the Nakoma Sky Senior Living Facility Grading Exception finding that __________________________. Attachment 14 OV1601351 Nakoma Sky Senior Living Facility Page 11 of 11 Conceptual Design Review Board Staff Report SUGGESTED MOTIONS (Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Recreation Area Plan Item 4B): I MOVE to recommend approval to Town Council of the Nakoma Sky Senior Living Facility Conceptual Site Plan (including waiver of separated pedestrian access ways), Landscape Plan and Recreation Area Plan, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1. OR I MOVE to recommend denial to Town Council of the Nakoma Sky Senior Living Facility Conceptual Site Plan (including waiver of separated pedestrian access ways), Landscape Plan and Recreation Area Plan finding that __________________________. SUGGESTED MOTIONS (Architecture Item 4C): I MOVE to recommend approval to Town Council of the Nakoma Sky Senior Living Facility Architecture. OR I MOVE to recommend denial to Town Council of the Nakoma Sky Senior Living Facility Architecture finding that __________________________. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Conditions of Approval 2. Location Map 3. Approved Tentative Development Plan 4. Rezoning Conditions of Approval 5. Applicant’s Submittal 6. General Plan 7. Zoning Map 8. Grading Exception Request 9. Grading Exception Analysis 10. Design Principles Analysis 11. 2015 Architectural Concept 12. Proposed Architectural Concept 13. August 9th CDRB Staff Report 14. August 9th CDRB Minutes 15. Resident Email ___________________________________________ Bayer Vella, Planning Manager Attachment 14 Study Session – Conceptual Architecture Conceptual Design Review Board Staff Report PROJECT: Nakoma Sky Senior Living Facility CASE NUMBER: OV1601351 MEETING DATE: August 9, 2016 AGENDA ITEM: 6 STAFF CONTACT: Chad Daines cdaines@orovalleyaz.gov (520) 229-4896 Applicant: The WLB Group Inc., Robert Longaker Request: Presentation and discussion on Conceptual Architecture Location: Southeast corner of Naranja Drive and 1st Avenue Recommendation: This item is scheduled for presentation and discussion only. No formal action of the Board will be taken at this meeting. This case will be scheduled for formal action on September 13, 2016. SUMMARY: The purpose of this agenda item is to provide an overview and presentation of the Conceptual Architecture for the Nakoma Sky project. Nakoma Sky is a planned senior care facility on 77 acres at the southeast corner of Naranja and 1st Avenue (Attachment 1). The planned facility is comprised of a main campus of buildings for independent living apartments, assisted living and memory care units, support services and private recreational amenities. Additional independent units, commercial areas, welcome center trailhead and community park area are also planned as part of the development. The approved Tentative Development Plan is provided on Attachment 2. The zoning for the Nakoma Sky campus was originally approved in January 2015, and then amended in November 2015 by Town Council. The main campus facility includes building heights ranging from one to five stories in height. A number of architectural techniques were required as part of the zoning conditions (Attachment 3) to reduce the scale and mass of the proposed buildings. These architectural techniques are summarized as follows:  Building height variation, including step downs at ends of the buildings  Roof plane variation  Wall plane variation  Material and color variation Attachment 14 OV1601351 Nakoma Sky Conceptual Architecture Page 2 of 4 Conceptual Design Review Board Staff Report  Landscaped terraces on multiple levels of the buildings The applicant has submitted the formal architectural submittal (Attachment 4). Staff has been reviewing the submittal for compliance with the zoning standards and the project is nearing formal consideration by the CDRB in September and Town Council in October. In summary, staff has found that the proposed architecture is in compliance with the rezoning conditions of approval and the Design Principles and Standards in the Zoning Code. The zoning conditions require the Conceptual Design Review Board (CDRB) and Town Council to determine the extent of variation during the design phase of the project. The purpose of the study session is to assist the CDRB in understanding the project and the evolution of the architectural concept to meet the rezoning requirements. No formal action will be taken at this meeting, however, input and direction to the applicant is encouraged. Additionally, the study session is focused on architecture only. The site plan and related details will be considered for formal action by CDRB in September. BACKGROUND: The original architectural concept approved in January 2015 as part of the rezoning consisted of primarily a single five story building with step downs at the ends of the structure (Attachment 5). In November 2015, Town Council approved a modified architectural concept which broke the single structure into multiple buildings of varying heights (Attachment 6). A composite elevation of the currently proposed architectural plan is provided as Attachment 7 for comparative purposes. As part of the approval, conditions were added to require the architecture to be improved to incorporate techniques to deemphasize the mass and reduce the visual impact of the buildings (Attachment 3). DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS: In summary, the proposed architecture has been reviewed by staff and found to be in compliance with the rezoning conditions of approval and the Design Principles and Design Standards of the Zoning Code. The conditions of approval require the CDRB and Town Council to determine the extent of visual impact mitigation during the design phase of the project. A summary of staff analysis is provided as follows: Roof Plane Variation The proposed architecture meets this requirement through several methods. First, the original single building has now been broken into multiple buildings of varying roof heights as shown on Attachment 4- Page 16. The multiple building design creates a significant diversity in roof planes and heights, meeting the intent of the condition. Secondarily, the modified plan incorporates multiple roof styles and orientations of roof planes which de-emphasize the mass of the building and create visual interest and variety. Attachment 14 OV1601351 Nakoma Sky Conceptual Architecture Page 3 of 4 Conceptual Design Review Board Staff Report Building Step Downs at Ends of Building A rezoning condition was included requiring step downs at the ends of the buildings to reduce the visual mass. The modified plan has addressed this condition by including multiple buildings at varying heights, with lower heights proposed at the ends of the structures and at more visible locations within the development. Wall Plane Variation The proposed plan meets this requirement through the use of differing wall planes, colonades and building recesses. These techniques break up the overall mass of the building and reduce the overall visual impact of the structures. Material and Color Variation The proposed architecture includes significant variation in building colors which accentuate differing wall planes and building recesses. Additionally, the design has incorporated significant variation in building materials including stucco, stone, wood textured materials, patterned block, textured block and architectural motifs. The colors and materials have been consistently applied to all four sides of every building, meeting the Town’s “four sided architecture” requirements and the rezoning conditions of approval. Landscape Terraces The rezoning condition requires that landscaping terraces be provided to soften the building façade. The applicant has incorporated landscaped terracing where possible. Many of the units include screened in porches which preclude the use of landscaping. Staff worked with the applicant to find landscape terrace areas on the most visible upper floors of the buildings. The modified plan meets the intent of the rezoning condition to soften the more visible façades of the buildings. Minor Revision – Parking Structures The applicant is completing a minor revision to the proposal to include an architectural concept for the parking structures, one of which was relocated from underneath the building. This architectural detail will be included in the September report to the CDRB. CONCLUSION In summary, the applicant has substantially evolved the project architecture to meet the rezoning conditions of approval. Staff has analyzed the proposal and finds it in conformance with the intent of the rezoning conditions and the Design Principles and Design Standards of the Zoning Code. Attachment 14 OV1601351 Nakoma Sky Conceptual Architecture Page 4 of 4 Conceptual Design Review Board Staff Report The purpose of this agenda item is to familiarize the Board with the proposed architectural concept and receive input relative to the extent of visual impact mitigation. The architectural concept and site plan will be considered formally by the Board in September for recommendation to Town Council. As such, no action will be taken by the Board at this meeting. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Approved Tentative Development plan 3. Rezoning Conditions of Approval 4. Proposed Architectural Concept 5. January 2015 Original Architectural Concept 6. November 2015 Modified Architectural Concept 7. Proposed Architectural Composite ___________________________________________ Bayer Vella, Planning Manager Attachment 14 September 29, 2016 Conceptual Design Review Board Page 1 of 7 MINUTES ORO VALLEY CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW BOARD SPECIAL SESSION September 20, 2016 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE SPECIAL SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER Chair Eggerding called the September 20, 2016, Special Session of the Oro Valley Conceptual Design Review Board to order at 6:00 pm. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Chair Eggerding led the members of the Board and Audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Dick Eggerding, Chair Bruce Wyckoff, Vice Chair Sarah Chen, Member Nathan Basken, Member Hal Linton, Member Jacob Herrington, Member Kit Donley, Member ABSENT: None ALSO PRESENT: Vice Mayor Waters Council Member Hornat Joe Andrews, Chief Civil Deputy Attorney CALL TO AUDIENCE There were no speaker requests. COUNCIL LIAISON COMMENTS There were no Council comments for this meeting. 1. REVIEW AND/OR APPROVAL OF THE AUGUST 9, 2016 REGULAR SESSION MEETING MINUTES September 29, 2016 Conceptual Design Review Board Page 2 of 7 Member Linton requested a change to the August 9, 2016 minutes noting he abstained from Item 4. MOTION: A motion was made by Vice Chair Wyckoff and seconded by Member Herrington to approve the August 9, 2016 regular session meeting minutes. MOTION carried, 7-0. 2. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON REQUESTS RELATED TO A PROPOSED ASSISTED LIVING AND MEMORY CARE FACILITY LOCATED AT 9005 N ORACLE ROAD, OV1601387 Robert Kirschman, Senior Planner, provided a presentation that included the following: - Purpose - Parking Space Deviation - Conceptual Site Plan - Alternative Parking Ratio - Conceptual Landscape Plan - Senior Care Requirements - Surrounding Development - Neighborhood Meeting Information Matt Booma, Senior Vice President of Development of CA Ventures, representing the developer and owner, provided a presentation that included the following: - Zoning Within Base Standards - Building Elevations - Technical Site Plan - Roof Mounted Elevations Key topics raised by the Board: - Roof mounted air conditioning units - Proposed parking numbers and how to manage on special days - Follow up question on shuttle buses if parking full - Window treatments on second floor in regards to afternoon sun - Concern or compromise of parking ratio and how to know that clients will not be driving - Traffic flow for emergency vehicles - Total occupancy at peak capacity is 104 residents - Significant vegetation relocation - Internal garbage enclosure clarification and trash pickup - One way counter clockwise traffic - Concern of parking and people needing to park offsite. September 29, 2016 Conceptual Design Review Board Page 3 of 7 - Where is the nearest bus stop? - Likelihood of public transportation higher in other cities and needing a plan for better parking management - Questioned on if ratio between Memory Care and Assisted Living clients absolute - Breakdown of caregivers to service personnel Chairman Eggerding opened the Public Hearing. There were no speaker requests. Chairman Eggerding closed the Public Hearing. Member Linton suggested an additional condition be added requiring the owner to monitor the parking situation. Chad Daines, Principal Planner, recommended that the Board take action on alternative parking ratio, without the suggested condition. MOTION: A motion was made by Vice Chair Wyckoff and seconded by Member Chen to recommend approval to Town Council of the Oro Valley Senior Living Facility Conceptual Site Plan (including alternative parking ratio, waiver from separate pedestrian access ways and significant vegetation reduction), Landscape Plan and Recreation Area Plan subject to the condition in Attachment 1. MOTION carried, 7-0. MOTION: A motion was made by Vice Chair Wyckoff and seconded by Member Herrington to recommend approval to Town Council of the Oro Valley Senior Care Facility Conceptual Architecture. MOTION carried, 7-0. 3. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING A PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN, LANDSCAPE PLAN AND MASTER RECREATION AREA PLAN FOR THE ALTERRA AT VISTOSO TRAILS SUBDIVISION, LOCATED HALF MILE EAST OF MOORE ROAD AND RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD, OV1215-14 Chad Daines, Principal Planner, provided a presentation that included the following: - Conceptual Site Plan - General Plan Conditions - Park Amenities - Neighborhood Meetings - Moore Road - Park broken into 2 phases September 29, 2016 Conceptual Design Review Board Page 4 of 7 Key Topics raised by the Board: - Inquiry on length of time since the neighborhood meeting - Moore Road Alignment - Rational of dividing the park into two phases - Traffic Circle - Continuation of Moore Road as a future Right of Way - Assurance of Moore Road continuing to Arrowsmith Drive, whether public or private Paul Oland, The WLB Group, representing the property owner, Mattamy Homes, provided a presentation that included the following: - Vistoso Trails - Additional Neighborhood Meetings - Second Part of Moore Rd is Separate Ownership Key Topics Raised by the Board: - Wash flow direction and question whether water needed pumping - Sewer versus Lift Station - Sewage pump stations back up generators - Park Share Agreement with the three different phases - Park amenities that Mattamy Homes are responsible for in Phase One - Question on shaded play areas - Comment on open space conservation Chair Eggerding opened the Public Hearing Paul Loomis, Oro Valley Resident, spoke regarding the following issues: - Main concern regarding notification to homebuyers of public trails - Partial Park Concern The Board questioned public access to trail systems. - Chad Daines, Principal Planner, stated the Board could recommend a condition be added to the CC&R's notifying residents of nearby public trail systems and activities. Board inquired about the possibility of the park being built in one phase. MOTION: A motion was made by Vice Chair Wyckoff and seconded by Member Herrington recommend approval of the Mattamy Homes Conceptual Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Master Recreation Area Plan, based on the findings in the staff report, and condition be added to the CC&R's notifying owners of the nearby public access to trails in the area. September 29, 2016 Conceptual Design Review Board Page 5 of 7 MOTION carried, 7-0. 4. PUBLIC HEARING ON REQUESTS RELATED TO THE NAKOMA SKY SENIOR LIVING FACILITY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 1ST AVENUE AND NARANJA DRIVE, OV1601351 Chad Daines, Principal Planner, provided a presentation that included the following: - Site Plan / Landscape Plan - Tentative Development Plan - Grading Exception - Interconnected Paths and Trails - Senior Care Requirements - Separated Pedestrian Access Ways - Recreation Plan - Rezoning Architectural Concept - Architectural Concept Keri Silvyn, Esq., with Lazarus, Silvyn, & Bangs, representing Nakoma Sky, provided information regarding the following: - Height - Grading Waiver - Cut and Fill Strategy Member Linton questioned if there are any special requirements in regards to building on filled land. Member Wyckoff suggested presenting each item separately. Chairman Eggerding opened the Public Hearing. Paul Loomis, Oro Valley Resident, voiced concern regarding Water Detention Retention Waiver. Key Topics raised by the Board regarding grading exception: - Had a drainage report had been completed? - Were any problems and/or remedies with the drainage waiver? Chairman Eggerding Closed the Public Hearing. MOTION: A motion was made by Member Donley and seconded by Vice Chair Wyckoff recommend approval to Town Council of the Nakoma Sky Senior Living Facility Grading Exception, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1. September 29, 2016 Conceptual Design Review Board Page 6 of 7 MOTION carried, 7-0. Jeff Grobstein, Oro Valley Resident, stated his full support of the development. Member Linton questioned whether a bridge could be built across the wash to Oracle Road. MOTION: A motion was made by Vice Chair Wyckoff and seconded by Member Basken to approve recommendation to Town Council of the Nakoma Sky Senior Living Facility Conceptual Site Plan (including waiver of separated pedestrian access ways), Landscape Plan, and Recreation Area Plan, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1. MOTION carried, 7-0. Gary Koerner, President, Three Living Architects, provided a presentation addressing color palette issues and other minor changes since the August 9, 2016 meeting.. MOTION: A motion was made by Member Chen and seconded by Vice Chair Wyckoff recommend approval to Town Council of the Nakoma Sky Senior Living Facility Architecture. MOTION carried, 7-0. PLANNING UPDATE (INFORMATIONAL ONLY) Chad Daines, Principal Planner, presented the Planning Update: - Conceptual Design Review Board, October 11 may be cancelled - September 21 Town Council Meeting three upcoming items - October 5 Town Council Meeting two upcoming items - No Upcoming Neighborhood Meetings ADJOURNMENT MOTION: A motion was made by Vice Chair Wyckoff and seconded by Member Herrington adjourn was made by Bruce Wyckoff, Vice Chair and seconded by Jacob Herrington, Member to adjourn the Conceptual Design Review Board at 7:58 pm. August 9, 2016 Conceptual Design Review Board Page 1 of 7 ACTION MINUTES ORO VALLEY CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW BOARD REGULAR SESSION AUGUST 9, 2016 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER Chairman Eggerding called the August 9, 2016 Regular Session of the Oro Valley Conceptual Design Review Board meeting to order at 6:00 PM. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Dick Eggerding, Chair Bruce Wyckoff, Vice Chair Nathan Basken, Member Sarah Chen, Member Kit Donley, Member Jacob Herrington, Member Hal Linton, Member ABSENT: None ALSO PRESENT: Tobin Sidles, Director Legal Services PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Chair Eggerding led the members of the Board and Audience in the Pledge of Allegiance CALL TO AUDIENCE There were no speaker requests. COUNCIL LIAISON COMMENTS There was no Council Liaison in attendance. 1. REVIEW AND/OR APPROVAL OF THE JULY 12, 2016 REGULAR SESSION MEETING MINUTES August 9, 2016 Conceptual Design Review Board Page 2 of 7 MOTION: A motion was made by Bruce Wyckoff, Vice Chair and seconded by Nathan Basken, Member to approve the July 12, 2016 regular session meeting minutes. MOTION carried, 7-0. 2. CONCEPTUAL MODEL HOME ARCHITECTURE FOR MATTAMY HOMES AT RANCHO VISTOSO PARCEL 5F LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF MOORE ROAD AND RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD, OV1315-11 Rosevelt Arellano, Senior Planner, provided a presentation that included the following: - Purpose - Site Location - Approved Site Plan Location Map - Building Cluster Diagram - Desert Contemporary - Building Cluster No. 1 - Desert Contemporary - Rustic Spanish - Building Cluster No. II - Rustic Spanish - Sonoran - Building Cluster No. III - Sonoran - Surrounding Homes - Splendido - Summary and Recommendation Josh Robinson, Division President of Mattamy Homes, provided an overview of the project that included the following: - Ridge View at Vistoso Trails - Site Plan of property lines Ryan Repucci, RAH Architect representative on behalf of Mattamy, provided a presentation that included the following: - Floor Plan Diagram - Sample Block Shift Plans - Desert Contemporary Floor Plan - Color Package Desert Contemporary - Sonoran Color Package - Rusted Spanish - Plan 2 Desert Contemporary - Plan 2 - Side Elevation - Plan 3 - Desert Contemporary - Plan 2 - Sonoran Elevation - Plan 4 - Sonoran Elevation - Plan 5 - Casita - Sonoran Elevation August 9, 2016 Conceptual Design Review Board Page 3 of 7 - Plan 5 Casita - Side Elevation - Plan 5 Casita Elevation - Plan 6 Side Elevation - Diversity of Material and color palette - Elevation type with garage door - Color Packages - Material Palette Chairman Eggerding opened the Public Hearing. There were no speaker requests. Chairman Eggerding closed the Public Hearing. Member Basken asked about the potential view impacts from Rancho Vistoso Boulevard. He was concerned about the lack of architectural treatments on the rear elevation. The applicant discussed the amount of landscaping and screen walls to be constructed between Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and the proposed subdivision , limiting potential visual impacts. MOTION: A motion was made by Nathan Basken, Member and seconded by Jacob Herrington, Member to approve the Conceptual Model Home Architecture (Plans 1 through 6) for the Rancho Vistoso Parcel 5F subdivision as provided within Attachment 1, based on the findings that the request complies with the Design Principles and Design Standards in the Zoning Code. MOTION carried, 7-0. 3. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON A REQUEST FOR CONCEPTUAL ARCHITECTURE FOR THE CANYON DEL ORO BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION, LOCATED AT 9200 N ORACLE ROAD, ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ORACLE ROAD AND CALLE CONCORDIA, OV16001613 Chad Daines, Principal Planner, provided a presentation that included the following: - Purpose - Location Map - Site Plan Diagram - Proposed Architecture - Sanctuary - Proposed Building Height - Sanctuary - Proposed Architecture - Youth Building - Existing Campus - Pusch Ridge Christian Academy August 9, 2016 Conceptual Design Review Board Page 4 of 7 - Single Family Homes - Recommendation Ed Marley, Architect, Swaim Associates, representing the applicant, provided a presentation that included the following: - CDO Baptist Sanctuary and Youth Building Additions Conceptual Architectural Review Submittal - Site Plan - North Elevation - Entry into Sanctuary - East Elevation of Sanctuary - West Elevation of Existing Campus - East Elevation of Student Center - Southwest Elevation of Student Center - Site Sections - Building Sections - Sanctuary - Building Sections - Youth - Site Photos - Color and Materials Palette Member Basken asked about the height of the existing cross on the roof of the current facility. Concerns were raised regarding the lack of context relating to the requested building height increase. Staff estimated the height to be approximately 30 feet and referenced the adjacent Pusch Ridge Christian Academy to the north as having a similar building height. MOTION: A motion was made by Bruce Wyckoff, Vice Chair and seconded by Sarah Chen, Member to recommend approval of the Conceptual Architecture finding that the request is in conformance with the Design Principles and applicable Design Standards and to allow an increase in height for the sanctuary building to 36 feet. MOTION carried, 7-0. Mr. Sidles noted for the record that there were no speaker requests for this item. 4. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION FOR A REVISION TO THE MASTER SIGN PROGRAM AT THE ROONEY RANCH CENTER INCLUDING THE FRY’S GROCERY AND FUEL CENTER, LOCATED AT 10661 N. ORACLE ROAD. THE REVISION IS TO ALLOW ELECTRONIC CHANGEABLE COPY SIGNS FOR FUEL PRICING, OV1601741 Patty Hayes, Senior Planning Technician, provided a presentation that included the following: August 9, 2016 Conceptual Design Review Board Page 5 of 7 - Purpose - Location - Master Sign Program - History - Proposed Revision - Additional Monument Sign - General Plan - Summary and Recommendation Andy Gibson, President of Bootz & Duke Signs, representing the applicant, provided a presentation that included the following: - Proposed Revision - Gave a brief history of the master sign program for Rooney Ranch, Parcel D Vice Chair Wyckoff asked a question regarding the font size of the numbers on the gas sign being consistent with the existing sign at the gas station at Oracle Road and Pusch View Lane. The applicant responded that the font was 12 inches and would be similar to the existing sign. MOTION: A motion was made by Sarah Chen, Member and seconded by Bruce Wyckoff, Vice Chair to recommend approval of the revised Master Sign Program for the Rooney Ranch Center allowing electronic changeable copy and the additional monument sign based on the finding that the request is consistent with the Design Principles and Design Standards. MOTION carried, 6-1 with Member Linton abstaining. 5. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION FOR A REVISION TO THE SIGN CRITERIA FOR THE MAGEE PLAZA LOCATED AT 8085 N. ORACLE ROAD. THE REVISION IS TO EXPAND THE COLOR PALETTE AND SIGN DESIGN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT, OV1601513 Patty Hayes, Senior Planning Technician, provided a presentation that included the following: - Location - Sign Criteria - Proposed Revision - Additional Building Elevations - General Plan - Summary and Recommendation August 9, 2016 Conceptual Design Review Board Page 6 of 7 MOTION: A motion was made by Bruce Wyckoff, Vice Chair and seconded by Jacob Herrington, Member to recommend approval of the Magee Plaza Sign Criteria based on the finding that the proposed revised Sign Criteria is consistent with the Design Principles. MOTION carried, 7-0. 6. PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION ON PROPOSED ARCHITECTURE FOR THE NAKOMA SKY SENIOR CARE FACILITY, PLANNED FOR THE 77 ACRES AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER, NARANJA DRIVE AND 1ST AVENUE, OV1601351 Chad Daines, Principal Planner, provided a presentation that included the following: - Purpose - Location - Project Timeline - Tentative Development Plan - Rezoning - Architectural Concept - Architectural Rezoning Conditions - Architectural Concept Image - View Impacts - Building Height Step Downs - Building Height Step downs in elevation - Varied Roof and Wall Planes - Varied Roof and Building Materials - Landscaped Terraces - Muted Earth Tone Colors - Parking Garage - Summary Board Member Chen, questioned drainage to the property which included flood plain concerns. David Laws, Permitting Manager, addressed Member Chen's drainage and flood plain concerns. Board Member Herrington questioned the number of traffic entrances which would include emergency vehicle entrances. David Laws, Permitting Manager, addressed Board Member Herrington's question regarding traffic entrances versus the amount of units. Lisa Israel, CEO and President of La Posada Retirement Community, provided a presentation that included the following: August 9, 2016 Conceptual Design Review Board Page 7 of 7 - Nakoma Sky Introduction - Provided a brief history on La Posada in Green Valley and the future of Nakoma Sky - The benefits to Oro Valley - Future clientele for the proposed project - Project Timeline and Key Dates - Summary Gary Koener, President, Three Living Architects, provided a presentation that included the following: - Site Map - Project section / Building Elevation C - Project Materials - View from Southeast - Perspective A - Arial View from Southeast Perspective B - View of Residential Units at Ends of Wings - Perspective C - View of Residential Units at the End of Central Wings - Perspective D - View of Village and Commons - Perspective E - View of Arrival Court - Perspective F - View of Five Story Residential Building - Perspective G - View of Indoor Pool Building and Courtyard - Perspective H - Underground Garage - View of West Garage Building - Perspective J - Art Expression Building Vice Chair Wyckoff commented that in his opinion the elevations were too busy and he did not care for the green roofs. He also felt that older residents of the facility may have difficulty locating the building entrance. PLANNING UPDATE (INFORMATIONAL ONLY) Michael Spaeth, Senior Planner, presented the Planning Update: - September 13th Conceptual Design Review Board Meeting, three upcoming items. - September 7 Town Council Meeting six upcoming items. - August 25 Upcoming Neighborhood Meeting regarding the PAD Amendment and Conceptual Site Plan for a mini storage facility at Steam Pump Ranch. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: A motion was made by Bruce Wyckoff, Vice Chair and seconded by Hal Linton, Member to adjourn the Conceptual Design Review Board at 8:22 pm. MOTION carried, 7-0. 1 of 3 PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD REPORT DATE: June 21, 2016 TO: Parks and Recreation Advisory Board (PRAB) FROM: Bayer Vella, Planning Manager Chad Daines, Principal Planner SUBJECT: Nakoma Sky Community Park and Trailhead Southeast corner of Naranja and 1st Avenue This purpose of this agenda item is for the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board (PRAB) to review and provide recommendation to the Conceptual Design Review Board and Town Council on the proposed amenities for a community park and trailhead plan within the Nakoma Sky senior living facility. BACKGROUND Nakoma Sky is a planned senior care facility on 79 acres at the southeast corner of Naranja and 1st Avenue (Attachment 1). The planned facility is comprised of a main campus of buildings for independent living apartments, assisted living and memory care units. Additional independent units are planned in individual detached homes. The approved tentative development plan is provided on Attachment 2. The zoning for the Nakoma Sky campus was approved in November 2015 by Town Council. The development plan included a community park on 1st Avenue which will be privately owned and maintained by the developer, but will be open and available to the general public for recreational use. Additionally, the plan includes a trailhead along the CDO wash, which also will be for public use. The approved zoning requires that the specific amenities within these public areas will be established during the design phase and will include PRAB review and input. As information, separate private recreation amenities and facilities are planned adjacent to the main campus to serve the residents of the senior care facility and their guests. These private amenities are not the focus of the PRAB discussion. DISCUSSION The amenities proposed by the applicant in the community park and trailhead are depicted in Attachment 3 and summarized below: Community Park  Size: 2.3 acres Attachment 16 2 of 3  Covered playground structures  Labyrinth  Walking path and Par Course with 5 exercise stations  3 shaded ramadas with picnic tables  Barbeque grills  Drinking Fountain  Bench Seating  Bicycle rack  Public art  Desert garden  Public parking Trailhead  Trailhead access  3 shaded ramadas with picnic tables  Drinking fountain  Bicycle rack  Public art  Bench seating  Public parking The proposed amenities have been reviewed by planning and parks staff and meet the level of amenities as shown on the approved Tentative Development Plan (Attachment 2), with the exception of a dog park. Based on the lack of space to adequately accommodate a dog park and the nearby location of the dog park in Naranja Park, the applicant has proposed to delete the planned dog park and replace this amenity with a 5 station Par Exercise Course along the natural trail (Attachment 3). To establish parity with the amenities as shown on the approved Tentative Development Plan, staff is recommending the following additional amenity within the community park:  Passive turf area within the center of the natural trail The zoning for this project included the following statement relative to amenities within the community park area: “This project will provide a park, intended for use by residents of the project and for the public. The exact amenities in the park, and those made available to the public, will be determined at the Conceptual Site plan (CSP) stage and will be based on input that will be sought from members of the community of Oro Valley. The owner will also meet with the Oro Valley Parks and Recreation Advisory Board (PRAB) to seek their consultation and input on the types of recreational facilities in the park that may be most appropriate for public use.” Additionally, the applicant has proposed phasing of construction of the ramadas in both the community open space and trailhead area. The above zoning language provides that PRAB’s review is focused on the level of amenities within the community park and trailhead, not the phasing of improvements which will be determined by Town Council. CONCLUSION: The applicant will be present at the June 21st meeting to provide a detailed presentation and answer questions from the Board. Based on the PAD zoning and rezoning conditions, review and recommendation from PRAB is requested. Attachment 16 3 of 3 SUGGESTED MOTIONS: I move to recommend approval to Town Council of the community park and trailhead plan for Nakoma Sky, with the inclusion of a turf area, restroom facilities and lighting for safety. OR I move to recommend denial to Town Council of the community park and trailhead plan for Nakoma Sky, based on _______________________________. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Approved Tentative Development Plan 3. Community Park and Trailhead Submittal Attachment 16 MINUTES ORO VALLEY PARKS & RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR SESSION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUILDING HOPI CONFERENCE ROOM 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA 85737 Tuesday, June 21, 2016 CALL TO ORDER AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM Chair Wade called the meeting to order at 6:01 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT:Adam Wade, Chair Alison Sutton-Ryan, Vice Chair Tim Overton, Member Ellen Guyer, Member Thomas Carle, Member Betty Danker, Member ABSENT:Sarah Corning, Member OTHER STAFF PRESENT: Kristy Diaz-Trahan, Parks and Recreation Director Mary Snider, Town Councilmember Amanda Jacobs, Economic Development Manager Bayer Vella, Planning Manager Chad Daines, Principal Planner CALL TO AUDIENCE - At this time, any member of the public is allowed to address the Parks & Recreation Advisory Board on any issue not listed on today’s agenda. Pursuant to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, individual Board members may ask Town staff to review the matter, ask that the matter be placed on a future agenda, or respond to criticism made by speakers. However, the Parks & Recreation Advisory Board may not discuss or take legal action on matters raised during "Call to Audience." In order to speak during "Call to Audience" please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. Brendan Burns, Town Councilmember and Oro Valley resident, spoke about his disappointment with the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board in voting against swings at Riverfront Park. Page 1 of 4Parks and Recreation Advisory Board 9/21/2016file:///C:/Users/cdaines/Documents/Parks%20and%20Recreation%20Advisory%20Board.... Attachment 17 1. REVIEW AND/OR APPROVAL OF APRIL 19, 2016 REGULAR SESSION MINUTES Click here for minutes from April 19, 2016 session MOTION: A motion was made by Member Overton and seconded by Member Danker to approve the April 19, 2016 meeting minutes as written. MOTION carried, 5-0. 2. OPEN MEETING LAW AND MEETING PROCEDURE REVIEW BY JOE ANDREWS, CHIEF CIVIL DEPUTY ATTORNEY Click here for presentation Mr. Andrews, Chief Civil Deputy Attorney with the Town of Oro Valley's Legal Department, presented and reviewed the open meeting law and proper protocol for boards and commissions meetings. In February of 2011, the Town Council decided the same rules should apply to all boards and commissions. 3. PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION REGARDING NARANJA PARK’S VETERAN AND FIRST REPONDER MEMORIAL SITE LOCATION The Town Council voted unanimously on the location at Naranja Park west of the dog park, a roughly two-acre area. The intent of the park is to honor those in Arizona who have served our country in times of need. Norris Design firm is donating their time in designing the area. 4. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE RECOMMENDATION TO THE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AND TOWN COUNCIL ON THE COMMUNITY PARK AND TRAILHEAD PLAN FOR NAKOMA SKY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF NARANJA AND FIRST AVENUE Chad Daines, Principal Planner with the Town, presented on the project. The purpose of this agenda item is for the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board to provide input on the community park and trail head amenities within the Nakoma Sky project. Mr. Daines gave the background and overview of project. The park will be open to the public even though it will be privately owned and maintained. Action is needed at this meeting to continue with the project schedule. Applicant Keri Silvyn of the Lazarus, Silvyn and Bangs law firm, also presented on the project assisted by Rob Longacre of the WLB Group and Joni Condit, Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of La Posada-Green Valley. Ms. Silvyn provided further detail on the the Nakoma Sky project and the community park. The board provided feedback and discussion. Click here for memo Click here for location plan Page 2 of 4Parks and Recreation Advisory Board 9/21/2016file:///C:/Users/cdaines/Documents/Parks%20and%20Recreation%20Advisory%20Board.... Attachment 17 Click here for tentative development plan Click here for applicant submittal MOTION: A motion was made by Chair Wade and seconded by Member Carle to recommend approval to Town Council of the community park and trailhead plan for Nakoma Sky, with the inclusion of a turf area and restrooms. Discussion ensued regarding installing restrooms in the park area. The applicant advised restroom installation is not part of the plan for the park and have offered access to the main lobby restrooms. The sewer system will be installed when the independent units are built and then bathrooms can be installed, but the estimated timeframe for the independent units are unknown. The board also recommended a turf/grassy area within the park. MOTION: A motion was made by Chair Wade and seconded by Member Carle to Amend to recommend approval to Town Council of the community park and trailhead plan for Nakoma Sky, with the inclusion of turf area and restrooms to be phased in when the independent units across the park are installed. Vote taken by verbal roll call of each member of the board. MOTION carried, 6-0. A recess was taken at 7:56 p.m. and meeting reconvened at 8:06 p.m. 5. PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION ON THE ORO VALLEY COMMUNITY CENTER’S FIRST YEAR IN REVIEW Ms. Diaz-Trahan presented a general overview of the highlights of the Oro Valley Community Center since July 2015, including membership numbers, programs, camps, golf, tennis, tournaments, community events, new fitness equipment, building renovations and the restaurant rebrand. 6. DIRECTOR’S REPORT (DISCUSSION MUST BE LIMITED TO INFORMATION AND CLARIFICATION) Ms. Diaz-Trahan reported on the following: - Chair Wade has served as representative on the Pima County Bicycle Advisory Committee and would like to step down. She asked the board to reach out to their contacts to see if someone is interested in taking over the role. - Town Council approved the Tho'ag Park name, one of two names selected by the board, for the park north of the Encantada apartment complex. Currently working with the developer to provide the signage. - CDO multi-use path. - The Parks and Recreation Department will be featured in the Tucson Biz magazine's October 2016 issue. - Hosting two 4th of July events this year: James D. Kreigh Park and the Oro Page 3 of 4Parks and Recreation Advisory Board 9/21/2016file:///C:/Users/cdaines/Documents/Parks%20and%20Recreation%20Advisory%20Board.... Attachment 17 Valley Community Center. - Three Parks and Recreation employees are beginning a three-year process to obtain certification from the International Festivals and Events Association. - The Arizona Parks and Recreation Association annual conference is August 10- 11, 2016. Board members can attend the conference and book one hotel night at the Town's expense. - The budget was approved by Town Council as presented for the department. The two fields at Naranja park were approved as well as swings installation (location to be determined), and a possible $500,000 bond for parks. 7. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS (THE PARKS & RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD MAY BRING FORTH GENERAL TOPICS FOR FUTURE MEETING AGENDAS. DISCUSSION MUST BE LIMITED TO INFORMATION AND CLARIFICATION) - Presentation/discussion on programs for needs adults and children, including a playground area (what we currently offer and future opportunities). 8. NEXT MEETING DATE TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR AUGUST 16, 2016 No discussion. ADJOURNMENT Chair Wade adjourned the meeting at 8:45 p.m. Prepared by: Jeanna Ancona Senior Office Specialist I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the special session of the Parks & Recreation Advisory Board of Oro Valley, Arizona held on the 21st day of June, 2016. I further certify that the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present. Page 4 of 4Parks and Recreation Advisory Board 9/21/2016file:///C:/Users/cdaines/Documents/Parks%20and%20Recreation%20Advisory%20Board.... Attachment 17 Town Council Regular Session Item # 3. Meeting Date:10/05/2016 Requested by: Bayer Vella Submitted By:Robert Kirschmann Development Infrastructure Services Department:Development Infrastructure Services Information SUBJECT: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON REQUESTS RELATED TO A PROPOSED ASSISTED LIVING AND MEMORY CARE FACILITY LOCATED AT 9005 N. ORACLE ROAD A. CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN, LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RECREATION AREA PLAN B. CONCEPTUAL ARCHITECTURE RECOMMENDATION: The Conceptual Design Review Board recommends approval of the requests, subject to the condition in Attachment 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The purpose of this agenda item is to consider the proposed Oro Valley Senior Care facility, on 3.3 acres at 9005 N. Oracle Road (Attachment 2). The planned facility is comprised of a single building for assisted living and memory care units, support services and private recreational amenities. There are two separate requests associated with the development which includes: Site Plan/ Landscape Plan/ Recreation Area Plan and Architectural Plan. A. The Site, Landscape and Recreation Plans conform with the Design Principles and the Zoning Code as follows: Parking appropriate to the proposed use is provided. The applicant was granted a request to reduce the parking because the residents will not drive, adequate parking is provided for employees and guests, and the proposed parking is similar to other facilities. All significant vegetation within 100 feet of Oracle Road will be protected in place or transplanted within the bufferyard. Private recreational amenities are provided The site conforms to the senior care requirements, with a waiver requested for resident walkways to some parking areas. B. The Architectural Plan conforms to the Design Principles and applicable Design Standards as follows: Traditional/contemporary southwest architecture Varied roof and wall planes Varied materials and colors Height and materials are compatible with surrounding development The applicant's submittal (Attachment 3) has been reviewed and recommended for approval by the Conceptual Design Review Board. BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: Land Use Context: The land use for this area is as follows: West: Across Oracle Road, LA Fitness and the Pulte Homes buildings North and South: Apartments West: Large lot residential General Plan: High Density Residential and Neighborhood Commercial/Office (Attachment 4) Zoning: Residential Service District (Attachment 5) Existing Site Conditions: 3.3 acres Vacant with significant vegetation Approvals to Date: 1959: Shadow Mountain Plat recorded 2007: Commercial Development Plan for an office complex approved (now expired) Proposed Improvements: 84,000 square foot building 69 assisted living units 32 memory care units 53,000 square feet of private indoor and outdoor recreation 56 parking spaces A. Conceptual Site /Landscape and Recreation Plans: The Site Plan reflects a single building with associated parking, recreation and landscaping. The proposal is consistent with Design Principles and applicable Design Standards. Items associated with these plans include: Conforms with the senior care requirements for covered parking, open space, recreation area, and resident walkways to most parking areas. A waiver, as enabled by the code, is requested for two parking areas. The requests are recommended as the residents of the facility will not drive. Relocation of significant vegetation supported based on the following: Parking lot and drive aisles designed to preserve 76% of the significant vegetation in place and the remaining will be relocated onsite. Moving 6 trees will increase survivabilty and reduce the grade of the driveway. Landscape Plan provides an attractive streetscape, appropriate bufferyards and screening of the loading zone. Alternative parking ratio (Attachment 6) approved based on: None of the residents drive and parking is provided for employees and guests. The proposed parking is consistent with similar facilities. Public art will be provided near the main entrance to the facility. A public art submittal is being prepared through a call to artists process through Southern Arizona Arts Cultural Alliance and will be forthcoming. The projected daily traffic generation of the Oro Valley Senior Living development is very low and minor in comparison to the daily traffic on Oracle Road. This development will not negatively affect the level of service of Oracle Road. The drainage system for the proposed development has been designed to meet the Town’s Drainage Criteria Manual and Floodplain Ordinance requirements. For more detail, please see analysis of Design Principle conformance in Attachment 7. B. Proposed Conceptual Architecture: The building architecture (Attachment 3) incorporates traditional and contemporary southwestern elements, shapes and materials and uses the following techniques to break up the height and mass of the buildings: Varied roof and wall planes Varied materials and colors The proposed Architectural Plan (Attachment 3) is compatible with the surrounding development, and the overall architecture is an enhancement to the area. For more detail, please see analysis of the Design Principles in Attachment 8. Public Participation: Public participation met the requirements of the Zoning Code. Notable elements of the public outreach included: A neighborhood meeting was held on May 13, 2016, with approximately 11 residents in attendance (Attachment 10). Applicant floated balloons at the approximate building height (Attachment 8). No resident comments were recieved. One email in support of the project was received (Attachment 11). Conceptual Design Review Board Action: The requests were considered by the Conceptual Design Review Board on September 20, 2016. Discussion at the meeting focused on the alternative parking ratio and significant vegetation. At the conclusion of the meeting the Conceptual Design Review Board recommended approval of the requests subject to the condition in Attachment 1. The Conceptual Design Review Board staff report and draft minutes are included as Attachment 12 and 13 respectively. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A SUGGESTED MOTION: Conceptual Site Plan (including waiver from separate resident walkways), Landscape Plan, and Recreation Area Plan (A) I MOVE to approve the Conceptual Site Plan (including waiver from separate resident walkways), Landscape Plan and Recreation Area Plan subject to the condition in Attachment 1. OR I MOVE to deny the Conceptual Site Plan (including waiver from separate resident walkways), Landscape Plan, and Recreation Area Plan finding that __________________________________. Conceptual Architecture (B) I MOVE to approve the Conceptual Architecture. OR I MOVE to deny the Conceptual Architecture finding that __________________________________. Attachments Attachment # 1 Condition of Approval Attachment # 2 Location Map Attachment # 3 Applicant Submittal Attachment # 4 General Plan Attachment #5 Zoning Map Attachment # 6 Parking Study Attachment # 7 CSP Design Principles Attachment # 8 CA Design Principles Attachment # 9 Neighborhood Meeting Notes Attachment # 10 Balloons Attachment # 11 Support Letter Attachment # 12 CDRB Staff Report Attachment # 13 - CDRB Minutes Attachment 1 Oro Valley Senior Care Conceptual Site Plan and Landscape Plan Conditions of Approval Engineering 1. Address all minor, technical redlined comments within the attached Conceptual Site Plan (CSP) and Conceptual Landscape Plan (CLP). Provide a comment response letter and return all redlined originals to the Town of Oro Valley. (Zoning Code Section 22.9.D.2.a) LOCATION MAP ORO VALLEY SENIOR CARE (OV1600512) Attachment 2 Hardy Road Calle Concordia Applicant’s Submittal APPLICANT SUBMITTAL ORO VALLEY SENIOR CARE (OV1600512) Attachment 3 Attachment 3 Attachment 3 Attachment 3 Attachment 3 Attachment 3 Attachment 3 Attachment 3 Attachment 3 Attachment 3 Attachment 3 FIRST FLOOR 0' - 0" T.O. PARAPET 25' - 0" STUCCO - SMOOTH TEXTUREINTRICATE PARAPET CAP MANUFACTURED MASONRY WOOD CLAD FRAME CAST STONE HEADER & SILL INTRICATE PARAPET CAP MASONRY VENEER VINYL WINDOW (GLAZING LRV NOT TO EXCEED 60%) PAINTED METAL SCUPPER STUCCO - ROUGH TEXTURE STUCCO - SMOOTH TEXTURE APPROX. LRV = 44% (NOT TO EXCEED 60%) APPROX. LRV = 56% (NOT TO EXCEED 60%) APPROX. LRV = 44% (NOT TO EXCEED 60%) MANUFACTURED MASONRY FIRST FLOOR 0' - 0" T.O. PARAPET 25' - 0" Level 17 2647' - 6" CAST STONE HEADER & SILL INTRICATE PARAPET CAP WOOD CLAD FRAME STUCCO - SMOOTH TEXTUREINTRICATE PARAPET CAP STUCCO - ROUGH TEXTURE APPROX. LRV = 44% (NOT TO EXCEED 60%) APPROX. LRV = 56% (NOT TO EXCEED 60%)MASONRY VENEER ? APPROX. LRV = 44% (NOT TO EXCEED 60%) VINYL WINDOW (GLAZING LRV NOT TO EXCEED 60%) TRELLIS FIRST FLOOR 0' - 0" T.O. PARAPET 25' - 0" T.O. FIRST FLOOR ROOF 12' - 6" T.O. CHIMNEY 28' - 0" Level 17 2647' - 6" WOOD CLAD FRAME MANUFACTURED MASONRY STUCCO - ROUGH TEXTURESTUCCO - ROUGH TEXTURE ENTRANCE PORTE COCHERE TRELLIS STUCCO - SMOOTH TEXTURE CAST STONE HEADER & SILL MASONRY VENEER TRELLIS INTRICATE PARAPET CAP 13' - 6"APPROX. LRV = 56% (NOT TO EXCEED 60%) APPROX. LRV = 44% (NOT TO EXCEED 60%) APPROX. LRV = 44% (NOT TO EXCEED 60%) VINYL WINDOW (GLAZING LRV NOT TO EXCEED 60%) MANUFACTURED MASONRY FIRST FLOOR 0' - 0" PRECAST MASONRY PIER, FINISH TO MATCH BUILDING PRECAST MASONRY INFILL PANEL, FINISH TO MATCH BUILDING. APPROX. LRV = 44% (NOT TO EXCEED 60%) CAST STONE CAP GRADE 2' - 0"10' - 0"2' - 0"2' - 0"10' - 0"VARIES1 EAST WACKER DRIVE SUITE 200 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60601 | USA (T) 312 324 7410 WWW.HED.DESIGN SHEET NO: SHEET TITLE: PROJECT NUMBER: COPYRIGHT © 2016 2015-40068-000 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A-04 CA Senior Living (312) 994-1880 mbooma@ca-ventures.com ORO VALLEY SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITY 9005 N Oracle Road, Oro Valley, AZ 85704 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 EAST ELEVATION AREA A SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"2 EAST ELEVATION AREA B SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"3 NORTH ELEVATION DATE ISSUE 06/02/2016 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING 06/06/2016 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 07/26/2016 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESUBMISSION 08/22/2016 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESUBMISSION TOWN OF ORO VALLEY CASE NUMBER: OV1601387 RELATED CASE NUMBER: OV1600044 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY CASE NUMBER: OV1601387 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"6 SCREEN AND RETAINING WALLS Attachment 3 FIRST FLOOR 0' - 0" T.O. PARAPET 25' - 0" Level 17 2647' - 6" STUCCO - ROUGH TEXTURE INTRICATE PARAPET CAP STUCCO - SMOOTH TEXTURE CAST STONE HEADER & SILL WOOD CLAD FRAME STUCCO - SMOOTH TEXTURE MASONRY VENEER APPROX. LRV = 56% (NOT TO EXCEED 60%) APPROX. LRV = 44% (NOT TO EXCEED 60%) WOOD CLAD FRAME APPROX. LRV = 44% (NOT TO EXCEED 60%) MANUFACTURED MASONRY MANUFACTURED MASONRY STUCCO - ROUGH TEXTURE APPROX. LRV = 44% (NOT TO EXCEED 60%) FIRST FLOOR 0' - 0" T.O. PARAPET 25' - 0" Level 17 2647' - 6" STUCCO - SMOOTH TEXTURE WOOD CLAD FRAME MASONRY VENEER INTRICATE PARAPET CAP STUCCO - ROUGH TEXTURE CAST STONE HEADER & SILL APPROX. LRV = 56% (NOT TO EXCEED 60%) APPROX. LRV = 44% (NOT TO EXCEED 60%) VINYL WINDOW (GLAZING LRV NOT TO EXCEED 60%) STUCCO - SMOOTH TEXTURE APPROX. LRV = 44% (NOT TO EXCEED 60%) FIRST FLOOR 0' - 0" T.O. PARAPET 25' - 0" T.O. FIRST FLOOR ROOF 12' - 6" T.O. CHIMNEY 28' - 0" Level 17 2647' - 6" INTRICATE PARAPET CAP 13' - 6"ENTRANCE PORTE COCHERE CAST STONE HEADER & SILL WOOD CLAD FRAME MANUFACTURED MASONRYMANUFACTURED MASONRY TRELLIS STUCCO - ROUGH TEXTURESTUCCO - SMOOTH TEXTURE APPROX. LRV = 44% (NOT TO EXCEED 60%) APPROX. LRV = 56% (NOT TO EXCEED 60%) ? 1 EAST WACKER DRIVE SUITE 200 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60601 | USA (T) 312 324 7410 WWW.HED.DESIGN SHEET NO: SHEET TITLE: PROJECT NUMBER: COPYRIGHT © 2016 2015-40068-000 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A-05 CA Senior Living (312) 994-1880 mbooma@ca-ventures.com ORO VALLEY SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITY 9005 N Oracle Road, Oro Valley, AZ 85704 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 WEST ELEVATION AREA A SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"2 WEST ELEVATION AREA B SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"3 SOUTH ELEVATION DATE ISSUE 06/02/2016 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING 06/06/2016 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 07/26/2016 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESUBMISSION 08/22/2016 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESUBMISSION TOWN OF ORO VALLEY CASE NUMBER: OV1601387 RELATED CASE NUMBER: OV1600044 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY CASE NUMBER: OV1601387Attachment 3 GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP ORO VALLEY SENIOR CARE (OV1601387) Attachment 4 Neighborhood Commercial/Office High Density Residential Low Density Residential Low Density Residential ZONING MAP ORO VALLEY SENIOR CARE (OV1600512) Attachment 5 R-S R1-36 R-4 R1-36 R-6 C-1 Parking Study PARKING STUDY ORO VALLEY SENIOR CARE (OV1600512) Attachment 6 Conceptual Site Plan Design Principles, Section 22.9.D.5.a Attachment # 7 The Conceptual Site Plan is, with the condition in Attachment 1, in conformance with applicable Conceptual Site Design Principles. Following are applicable Design Principles (in italics), followed by staff evaluation of how the design addresses the principles: Building orientation: the location, orientation and size of structures shall promote a complementary relationship of structures to one another. Staff Commentary: The entrance to the building will front on Oracle Road and provide a sense of arrival. Appropriate bufferyards are provided from the north, south and east residential uses. The height is similar to the townhomes to the north and apartments to the south. The building incorporates materials and colors from surrounding development and is compatible with these developments. Drainage/grading: site grading shall minimize impacts on natural grade and landforms and provide for subtle transitions of architectural elements to grade. Significant cuts and fills in relation to natural grade shall be avoided or minimized to the extent practical given property constraints. Staff Commentary: The site is lower than Oracle Road and includes and almost 16 foot elevation change. The cut and fill has been limited to the greatest extent possible. The grading has been prepared with the intention of preserving the maximum amount of corridor character vegetation. The site will include rainwater harvesting and underground stormwater retention. Connectivity: strengthen the usability and connectivity of the pedestrian environment internally and externally by enhancing access to the public street system, transit, adjoining development and pedestrian and bicycle transportation routes. Buildings and uses should provide access to adjacent open space and recreational areas where appropriate. Staff Commentary: A sidewalk will be provided along Oracle Road, connecting to the existing sidewalk to the north. A meandering sidewalk through the front bufferyard will connect the building to Oracle Road. In addition sidewalks are provided around the building and in the courtyard areas. Bike parking is provided in accordance with the code. Conceptual Architectural Design Principles, Section 22.9.D.5.b Attachment # 8 The Conceptual Architecture (see Attachment 3) is in conformance with applicable Architectural Design Principles. Following are the Design Principles (in italics) followed by staff evaluation of how the architecture conforms and responds to the principles: Design: building architectural design shall be appropriate for the climate and characteristics of the Sonoran Desert, including indigenous and traditional textures, colors, and shapes found in and around Oro Valley. All development shall maintain and strengthen the high quality of design exemplified in Oro Valley through project creativity and design excellence. The architecture includes a variety of materials including stone, brick, stucco, and wood. The architecture includes strong cornicing, lintels and the use of trellises. Both horizontal and vertical articulation is provided. The architectural design is appropriate for the area, is complimentary to existing development in the vicinity and complies with Town requirements. Scale, height and mass: building scale, height and mass shall be consistent with the town- approved intensity of the site, designated scenic corridors, and valued mountain views. Buildings shall be designed to respect the scale of adjoining areas and should mitigate the negative and functional impacts that arise from scale, bulk and mass. The building scale, height and mass is appropriate and complimentary to surrounding development including the townhomes to the north and apartments to the south. Façade articulation: all building facades shall be fully articulated, including variation in building massing, roof planes, wall planes, and surface articulation. Architectural elements including, but not limited to; overhangs, trellises, projections, awnings, insets, material, and texture shall be used to create visual interest that contribute to a building’s character. All elevations of the building façade are well articulated through the use of varying roof, wall planes, and varying materials. Screening: building design and screening strategies shall be implemented to conceal the view of loading areas, refuse enclosures, mechanical equipment, appurtenances, and utilities from adjacent public streets and neighborhoods. No mechanical equipment, refuse enclosures, appurtenances, or utilities will be visible from nearby residences or streets. Full compliance with this standard will be confirmed at the final design phase. 1 Attachment # 9 Neighborhood Meeting Summary Oro Valley Senior Care May 13, 2016 6:00 – 7:30 PM Church of the Nazarene 1. Introductions and Welcome Meeting Facilitator, Chad Daines, Principle Planner, introduced the Oro Valley staff Robert Kirschmann, Planner, as project planner. Approximately 11 residents and interested parties attended the meeting, including Vice Mayor Waters and Council member Hornat. 2. Staff Presentation Robert Kirschmann, Planner, provided a presentation that included: ∑Subject Property ∑Applicant’s request ∑Review process ∑Public participation opportunities 3. Applicant Presentation Chris Russ and Matt Booma from CA Ventures provided a presentation detailing the applicant’s proposal, which included: ∑Overview of project ∑Site Plan ∑Architectural style 4. Public Questions & Comments Following is a summary of additional questions and comments: ∑How many employees will the facility have? o Answer: Approximately 1 staff per every 8 residents ∑Who will be providing emergency medical transport and how will lights and sirens be handled? o Answer: Goulder Ranch is the Fire Department. Discussions can be held to request the use lights and sirens be limited. ∑Will there be a left turn into the facility? o Answer: No, there is an existing median and only right in, right out is proposed. ∑Lighting is a concern, particular the signage on LA Fitness. o Response: Town ordinances require shielding of lights and the Code will be enforced. The Town Council recently passed signage lighting standards and they will also be enforced. ∑Concerns were raised on drainage: 2 o Response: All drainage shall exit the site as it does today. No increase in the amount or speed at which it leaves is allowed. There are no plans to change any existing washes in the area. ∑What other facilities does CA Ventures have? o Response: There are 2 in Phoenix area, and several on the east coast/Midwest area. www.ca-ventures.com ∑What is the occupancy of other facilities? o Answer Approximately 90% ∑What is the building height? o Two stories and 25 feet in height. The applicant flew balloons on the site and agrees to fly them again this Saturday. ∑Will the memory care be locked down? o Restricted access will be provided to keep the memory care patients from leaving the facility. ∑Will there be adequate parking? o Answer: Most of the residents will not drive. Based on other facilities the applicant stated that enough parking is provided. Mr. Kirschmann and the CA Ventures team addressed the questions related to the proposed development. Mr. Arellano closed the meeting, thanked everyone for their attendance and encouraged everyone to contact Mr. Kirschmann, the project planner, with any additional thoughts, comments or concerns. BUILDING HEIGHT ORO VALLEY SENIOR CARE (OV16013877) Attachment 8 Above, Southeast corner of the building, looking west Right, Southwest corner of building looking east 1 Kirschmann, Robert From:Gary Lovelace <garyl@spectrumrealestateservices.net> Sent:Monday, May 16, 2016 2:49 PM To:Kirschmann, Robert Subject:Neighborhood meeting response OV 160-0044) Robert, I received a mail notice today about the meeting for the senior care facility on 9005 North Oracle Rd. I will not be able to attend the meeting, but I want to register my support and agreement with the development of a in senior housing facility on this property. Seems like a good use, and we need as much quality development Oro Valley as the infrastructure can accommodate. It will reduce the tax burden on the residents and give you the money you need to make our city progressive and accommodating. Thank you, Gary/Nancy Lovelace. 8850 North Glenhurst Pl. Attachment # 11 September 29, 2016 Conceptual Design Review Board Page 1 of 7 MINUTES ORO VALLEY CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW BOARD SPECIAL SESSION September 20, 2016 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE SPECIAL SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER Chair Eggerding called the September 20, 2016, Special Session of the Oro Valley Conceptual Design Review Board to order at 6:00 pm. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Chair Eggerding led the members of the Board and Audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Dick Eggerding, Chair Bruce Wyckoff, Vice Chair Sarah Chen, Member Nathan Basken, Member Hal Linton, Member Jacob Herrington, Member Kit Donley, Member ABSENT: None ALSO PRESENT: Vice Mayor Waters Council Member Hornat Joe Andrews, Chief Civil Deputy Attorney CALL TO AUDIENCE There were no speaker requests. COUNCIL LIAISON COMMENTS There were no Council comments for this meeting. 1. REVIEW AND/OR APPROVAL OF THE AUGUST 9, 2016 REGULAR SESSION MEETING MINUTES September 29, 2016 Conceptual Design Review Board Page 2 of 7 Member Linton requested a change to the August 9, 2016 minutes noting he abstained from Item 4. MOTION: A motion was made by Vice Chair Wyckoff and seconded by Member Herrington to approve the August 9, 2016 regular session meeting minutes. MOTION carried, 7-0. 2. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON REQUESTS RELATED TO A PROPOSED ASSISTED LIVING AND MEMORY CARE FACILITY LOCATED AT 9005 N ORACLE ROAD, OV1601387 Robert Kirschman, Senior Planner, provided a presentation that included the following: - Purpose - Parking Space Deviation - Conceptual Site Plan - Alternative Parking Ratio - Conceptual Landscape Plan - Senior Care Requirements - Surrounding Development - Neighborhood Meeting Information Matt Booma, Senior Vice President of Development of CA Ventures, representing the developer and owner, provided a presentation that included the following: - Zoning Within Base Standards - Building Elevations - Technical Site Plan - Roof Mounted Elevations Key topics raised by the Board: - Roof mounted air conditioning units - Proposed parking numbers and how to manage on special days - Follow up question on shuttle buses if parking full - Window treatments on second floor in regards to afternoon sun - Concern or compromise of parking ratio and how to know that clients will not be driving - Traffic flow for emergency vehicles - Total occupancy at peak capacity is 104 residents - Significant vegetation relocation - Internal garbage enclosure clarification and trash pickup - One way counter clockwise traffic - Concern of parking and people needing to park offsite. September 29, 2016 Conceptual Design Review Board Page 3 of 7 - Where is the nearest bus stop? - Likelihood of public transportation higher in other cities and needing a plan for better parking management - Questioned on if ratio between Memory Care and Assisted Living clients absolute - Breakdown of caregivers to service personnel Chairman Eggerding opened the Public Hearing. There were no speaker requests. Chairman Eggerding closed the Public Hearing. Member Linton suggested an additional condition be added requiring the owner to monitor the parking situation. Chad Daines, Principal Planner, recommended that the Board take action on alternative parking ratio, without the suggested condition. MOTION: A motion was made by Vice Chair Wyckoff and seconded by Member Chen to recommend approval to Town Council of the Oro Valley Senior Living Facility Conceptual Site Plan (including alternative parking ratio, waiver from separate pedestrian access ways and significant vegetation reduction), Landscape Plan and Recreation Area Plan subject to the condition in Attachment 1. MOTION carried, 7-0. MOTION: A motion was made by Vice Chair Wyckoff and seconded by Member Herrington to recommend approval to Town Council of the Oro Valley Senior Care Facility Conceptual Architecture. MOTION carried, 7-0. 3. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING A PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN, LANDSCAPE PLAN AND MASTER RECREATION AREA PLAN FOR THE ALTERRA AT VISTOSO TRAILS SUBDIVISION, LOCATED HALF MILE EAST OF MOORE ROAD AND RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD, OV1215-14 Chad Daines, Principal Planner, provided a presentation that included the following: - Conceptual Site Plan - General Plan Conditions - Park Amenities - Neighborhood Meetings - Moore Road - Park broken into 2 phases September 29, 2016 Conceptual Design Review Board Page 4 of 7 Key Topics raised by the Board: - Inquiry on length of time since the neighborhood meeting - Moore Road Alignment - Rational of dividing the park into two phases - Traffic Circle - Continuation of Moore Road as a future Right of Way - Assurance of Moore Road continuing to Arrowsmith Drive, whether public or private Paul Oland, The WLB Group, representing the property owner, Mattamy Homes, provided a presentation that included the following: - Vistoso Trails - Additional Neighborhood Meetings - Second Part of Moore Rd is Separate Ownership Key Topics Raised by the Board: - Wash flow direction and question whether water needed pumping - Sewer versus Lift Station - Sewage pump stations back up generators - Park Share Agreement with the three different phases - Park amenities that Mattamy Homes are responsible for in Phase One - Question on shaded play areas - Comment on open space conservation Chair Eggerding opened the Public Hearing Paul Loomis, Oro Valley Resident, spoke regarding the following issues: - Main concern regarding notification to homebuyers of public trails - Partial Park Concern The Board questioned public access to trail systems. - Chad Daines, Principal Planner, stated the Board could recommend a condition be added to the CC&R's notifying residents of nearby public trail systems and activities. Board inquired about the possibility of the park being built in one phase. MOTION: A motion was made by Vice Chair Wyckoff and seconded by Member Herrington recommend approval of the Mattamy Homes Conceptual Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Master Recreation Area Plan, based on the findings in the staff report, and condition be added to the CC&R's notifying owners of the nearby public access to trails in the area. September 29, 2016 Conceptual Design Review Board Page 5 of 7 MOTION carried, 7-0. 4. PUBLIC HEARING ON REQUESTS RELATED TO THE NAKOMA SKY SENIOR LIVING FACILITY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 1ST AVENUE AND NARANJA DRIVE, OV1601351 Chad Daines, Principal Planner, provided a presentation that included the following: - Site Plan / Landscape Plan - Tentative Development Plan - Grading Exception - Interconnected Paths and Trails - Senior Care Requirements - Separated Pedestrian Access Ways - Recreation Plan - Rezoning Architectural Concept - Architectural Concept Keri Silvyn, Esq., with Lazarus, Silvyn, & Bangs, representing Nakoma Sky, provided information regarding the following: - Height - Grading Waiver - Cut and Fill Strategy Member Linton questioned if there are any special requirements in regards to building on filled land. Member Wyckoff suggested presenting each item separately. Chairman Eggerding opened the Public Hearing. Paul Loomis, Oro Valley Resident, voiced concern regarding Water Detention Retention Waiver. Key Topics raised by the Board regarding grading exception: - Had a drainage report had been completed? - Were any problems and/or remedies with the drainage waiver? Chairman Eggerding Closed the Public Hearing. MOTION: A motion was made by Member Donley and seconded by Vice Chair Wyckoff recommend approval to Town Council of the Nakoma Sky Senior Living Facility Grading Exception, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1. September 29, 2016 Conceptual Design Review Board Page 6 of 7 MOTION carried, 7-0. Jeff Grobstein, Oro Valley Resident, stated his full support of the development. Member Linton questioned whether a bridge could be built across the wash to Oracle Road. MOTION: A motion was made by Vice Chair Wyckoff and seconded by Member Basken to approve recommendation to Town Council of the Nakoma Sky Senior Living Facility Conceptual Site Plan (including waiver of separated pedestrian access ways), Landscape Plan, and Recreation Area Plan, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1. MOTION carried, 7-0. Gary Koerner, President, Three Living Architects, provided a presentation addressing color palette issues and other minor changes since the August 9, 2016 meeting.. MOTION: A motion was made by Member Chen and seconded by Vice Chair Wyckoff recommend approval to Town Council of the Nakoma Sky Senior Living Facility Architecture. MOTION carried, 7-0. PLANNING UPDATE (INFORMATIONAL ONLY) Chad Daines, Principal Planner, presented the Planning Update: - Conceptual Design Review Board, October 11 may be cancelled - September 21 Town Council Meeting three upcoming items - October 5 Town Council Meeting two upcoming items - No Upcoming Neighborhood Meetings ADJOURNMENT MOTION: A motion was made by Vice Chair Wyckoff and seconded by Member Herrington adjourn was made by Bruce Wyckoff, Vice Chair and seconded by Jacob Herrington, Member to adjourn the Conceptual Design Review Board at 7:58 pm. Town Council Regular Session Item # 4. Meeting Date:10/05/2016 Requested by: Councilmember Hornat & Vice Mayor Waters Submitted By:Mike Standish, Town Clerk's Office Department:Town Clerk's Office Information SUBJECT: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE DIRECTION TO STAFF TO REVIEW POLICY REGARDING COUNCILMEMBER'S TRAVEL EXPENDITURES FOR CONFORMANCE TO BUDGET RECOMMENDATION: N/A EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Councilmember Hornat and Vice Mayor Waters have requested that this item be placed on the agenda for discussion. BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: N/A SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to _____________________________________ Attachments No file(s) attached. Town Council Regular Session Item # 5. Meeting Date:10/05/2016 Requested by: Councilmember Zinkin & Councilmember Garner Submitted By:Mike Standish, Town Clerk's Office Department:Town Clerk's Office Information SUBJECT: MOTION TO REMOVE THE FOLLOWING ITEM FROM THE TABLE: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE DIRECTION REGARDING THE TOWN'S INVOLVEMENT IN THE OVERLOOK RESTAURANT LOCATED AT 10555 N. LA CANADA DRIVE, INCLUDING THE POSSIBILITY OF CONTRACTING THE SERVICES OR CLOSING THE RESTAURANT RECOMMENDATION: N/A EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Councilmember Zinkin and Councilmember Garner have requested that this item be placed on the agenda for discussion. BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: This item was tabled at the September 21, 2016 Council meeting. In order to allow for discussion on this item, it first needs to be removed from the table. Should the motion to remove the item from the table be successful, the item will be discussed as the very next item on the agenda. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to _____________________________________ Attachments No file(s) attached. Town Council Regular Session Item # 6. Meeting Date:10/05/2016 Requested by: Councilmember Zinkin & Councilmember Garner Submitted By:Mike Standish, Town Clerk's Office Department:Town Clerk's Office Information SUBJECT: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE DIRECTION REGARDING THE TOWN'S INVOLVEMENT IN THE OVERLOOK RESTAURANT LOCATED AT 10555 N. LA CANADA DRIVE, INCLUDING THE POSSIBILITY OF CONTRACTING THE SERVICES OR CLOSING THE RESTAURANT (This item is only necessary if the motion to remove the item from the table is successful) RECOMMENDATION: N/A EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Councilmember Zinkin and Councilmember Garner have requested that this item be placed on the agenda for discussion. BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: N/A SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to _____________________________________ Attachments No file(s) attached. Town Council Regular Session Item # 7. Meeting Date:10/05/2016 Requested by: Councilmember Burns & Councilmember Zinkin Submitted By:Mike Standish, Town Clerk's Office Department:Town Clerk's Office Information SUBJECT: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE DIRECTION REGARDING THE COMMUNITY ELEMENTS OF PHASES II AND III FOR THE AQUATICS CENTER RECOMMENDATION: N/A EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Councilmember Burns and Councilmember Zinkin have requested that this item be placed on the agenda for discussion. BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: N/A SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to _____________________________________ Attachments No file(s) attached.