No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPackets - Council Packets (1837)Town Council Meeting Regular and Study Session December 6, 2023 Town Council Meeting Announcements Upcoming meetings Meetings are subject to change. Check the Town website for meeting status. Water Utility Finance Subcommittee December 11 at 9:00 a.m. Water Utility Conference Room Water Utility Commission -CANCELLED December 11 at 5:00 p.m. Board of Adjustment Special Session -CANCELLED December 18 at 3:00 p.m. Budget and Finance Commission Regular Session December 19 at 4:00 p.m. Council Chambers Neighborhood Meeting: Rezone & Development Plan Vistoso Highlands Drive December 20 at 6:00 p.m. Council Chambers Stormwater Utility Commission Meeting -CANCELLED December 21 at 4:00 p.m. Town Council Regular Session* January 10, 2024, at 6:00 p.m. (2nd Wednesday) Council Chambers 4 OV’s Path Forward Upcoming Community Events Thursday, December 7 4:30PM-6:30PM Riverfront Park Friday, December 15 3:30 PM-5:30 PM Oro Valley Public Library Saturday, December 9 9AM-1PM Second Saturday at Steam Pump Ranch Sunday, December 17 11AM -1PM Fry’s Food Store on La Cañada & Lambert Thursday, December 14 5PM–8PM Volunteer Reception Dinner El Conquistador Hotel Thursday, December 21 5PM-8PM SnOV: An Oro Valley Holiday Event at the Community Center 5 Stay up-to-date about events & join the online conversation at www.OVPathForward.com Town Council Meeting Regular and Study Session December 6, 2023 7 Spotlight on Youth –Aminiah Ochoa Town Council Meeting Regular and Study Session December 6, 2023 9 Mayor and Council Reports –TBD Town Council Meeting Regular and Study Session December 6, 2023 11 Report on Current Events Town Council Meeting Regular and Study Session December 6, 2023 All Aboard Arizona Presentation Town Council December 6, 2023 All Aboard Arizona Presentation to the Town of Oro Valley/Pima Association of Governments -Todd Liebman All Aboard Arizona-President -Jennifer Davis Page All Aboard Arizona Board Member 602-412-1637 Todd’s cell: 608-333-7726 tjliebman@gmail.com Executive Summary of Key Ideas •Now is the time for the Sun Corridor; a once in a generation opportunity -Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) •Arizona wants passenger rail •Strong bi-partisan support •Amtrak supports a daily Sunset Limited routed through Phoenix and has applied for two IIJA grants •The Federal Railroad Administration’s Long Distance Passenger Rail Study •The State of Arizona has applied for the Federal Railroad Administration’s Corridor ID program 1971 Population was 207,372,000 Passenger rail was nearly dead Air travel was growing Highways were expanding, but congestion was already a problem Intercity highway system was not yet completed Robust intercity bus system 2023 Population is 334,233,854 Passenger rail is growing and more communities are demanding service Air travel is withdrawing from smaller cities Air Traffic Control is facing serious challenges Airport congestion needs relief Highways are at the breaking point and incredibly expensive to build and maintain Rail can help solve multiple challenges; loss of service to rural and underserved communities, congestion mitigation, quality of life, economic development to rural and struggling communities The US will surpass the population of the European Union by 2050 Sun Corridor Tucson to Phoenix High Performance Rail •EXISTING RIGHTS OF WAY GO TO ALL THE RIGHT PLACES •Easier to develop and less costly than most projects •Phase 1 Environmental already completed •Support is solid throughout the corridor •Arizona has applied for the Corridor ID program Daily Sunset Limited Through Phoenix “Low hanging fruit” •Strong Existing Ridership •Links to the national rail system east and west •Reintroduces Rail Travel to Phoenix •Amtrak has applied for two grants 18 Rail Passenger Service Presents Unmatched Opportunities •It’s congestion mitigation for the I-10 corridor •It’s economic development for cities and towns throughout Arizona •It’s the greenest form of transportation in a region hard hit by global warming •It supports long term, sustainable, lasting employment and tax revenue Questions? Town Council Meeting Regular and Study Session December 6, 2023 Town Council December 6, 2023 Study Session: Town of Oro Valley’s Housing Study Elliott D. Pollack & Company Court, Merritt, Pollack, & Stevenson Presentation to Housing Conditions & Gap Assessment November 7, 2023 Elliott D. Pollack & Company Court, Merritt, Pollack, & Stevenson Purpose Fulfill action item in the Town’s current General Plan and previous strategic plan Prepare for next 10-year plan Housing element required by State law Tonight’s presentation will focus on OV’s housing gaps and opportunities Elliott D. Pollack & Company Court, Merritt, Pollack, & Stevenson Our Team Economic consulting firm based in Scottsdale, Arizona. Established in 1987 with specializations in real estate, demographics, economic impact modeling, and market research. Have provided economic consulting services for nearly every community and county in Arizona. Recent housing studies include: ECONA (communities of Flagstaff, Williams, Camp Verde, Sedona, and Winslow), Lake Havasu City, City of Sedona, Verde Valley (Cottonwood, Clarkdale, Jerome), and City of Mesa. In business since 1959, Arizona’s longest-standing market research firm. We have served the State’s businesses and government entities with local, responsive, high quality research services for over 60 years. Recent Related Project examples: o City of Eloy o Town of Queen Creek o City of Phoenix T2050 Baseline Survey o City of Tempe Transit Media Surveys for the MDOT Attitude and Perception Surveys o MAG RTP and RME Surveys o MAG Travel Surveys o Arizona Office of Tourism Visitor Impact Survey o Valley Metro Rider Satisfaction, Safety and Recovery Surveys o Valley Metro TDM Public Opinion Surveys Elliott D. Pollack & Company Court, Merritt, Pollack, & Stevenson Telephone Survey Overview A phone survey targeting residents was conducted via outbound telephone interviews by the WestGroup interviewing team. Data from the phone survey was collected from residents in selected households via a random sample of listed cellphone or landline phone numbers within the Oro Valley zip code areas. All residents were screened to ensure they resided in one of the five Oro Valley zip codes (85737, 85755, 85704, 85742, or 85739). Ultimately, 401 surveys were completed in total. The average interview length was 15.5 minutes. The data were weighted to accurately represent the general population. The total weighted sample size of n=401 has a margin of error of ±4.9% at the 95% confidence level. Elliott D. Pollack & Company Court, Merritt, Pollack, & Stevenson Supplemental Surveys Resident online survey (1,211 completed surveys) Web data should be considered supplemental in nature to the phone survey results. Although participants must opt-in to both surveys, self-selection bias is higher with the web survey. This means we can assume that individuals that took time to respond to the web survey are more likely to be highly engaged community members. Business and workforce online survey (136 completed surveys) All respondents were screened to ensure they were a business owner or an employee of a company in Oro Valley. Only non-resident employees were invited to complete this survey; employed residents of Oro Valley were encouraged to take the corresponding Oro Valley resident survey. Ultimately, 136 surveys were completed in total, 51 business owners and 85 non-resident employees. These results should be seen as supplemental to the resident survey conducted via phone. While insightful, these data may not be representative of the population of Oro Valley business owners or non-residents who work in Oro Valley as no methods were used to monitor responses to ensure accurate representation across non-resident employees or business owners in Oro Valley. Elliott D. Pollack & Company Court, Merritt, Pollack, & Stevenson Majority of Oro Valley Residents Feel Housing Costs is a Concern 26% 34% 40% 15% 37% 48% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60% Very concerning Somewhat concerning Not concerning Concerns of Housing Cost Phone Online Elliott D. Pollack & Company Court, Merritt, Pollack, & Stevenson High home price was chosen as the #1 barrier to homeownership, followed by: 2. High interest rates 3. Saving for Downpayment 4. Lack of housing supply 54% 29% 14% 10% 9% 5% 5% 4% 3% 2% 2% 13% 5% 36% 33% 20% 12% <1% 15% 11% 5% 1% 1% <1% 24% 0%20%40%60% Average home price High interest rates Not enough for a down payment Lack of housing supply Poor economy Paying too much rent to save Qualifying for a mortgage Lack of housing choice Lack of financial education Poor credit Employment issues Other No barriers experienced or known Barriers to Homeownership Phone Online Elliott D. Pollack & Company Court, Merritt, Pollack, & Stevenson 1 in 10 residents indicated they are at least “somewhat likely” to move away from Oro Valley due to housing costs with 4% “very likely” or “nearly certain” Most vulnerable are: •Residents who rent (24% very + nearly certain) •Under age 35 (18% very + nearly certain) •Residents living in 85704 (9% very + nearly certain) •Households with children (7% very + nearly certain) 30 52%36%7%3%1% 0%20%40%60%80%100% Likelihood to move Likelihood to Leave Oro Valley Due to Cost Among those with an Opinion Not planning to move Not likely Somewhat likely Very likely Nearly certain Elliott D. Pollack & Company Court, Merritt, Pollack, & Stevenson Nearly half of Oro Valley business owners and workers commuting from outside the Town feel housing cost/rent is too high in Oro Valley. Another 20-27% say rent is affordable, but homeownership is out of reach. Elliott D. Pollack & Company Court, Merritt, Pollack, & Stevenson Oro Valley residents are most concerned about providing affordable housing for essential workers, service workers, and young professionals. Second highest concern was housing options for seniors, veterans, and persons with disabilities. 25% 18% 17% 16% 11% 22% 24% 18% 18% 14% 25% 28% 32% 30% 34% 15% 17% 19% 18% 20% 13% 13% 14% 18% 21% 0%20%40%60%80%100% There is a lack of financially attainable housing for teachers, police, first responders, retail or service employees, or entry level professionals. There is a lack of financially attainable housing for seniors, veterans, or persons with disabilities. There is a lack of adequately sized housing options for multi-generational living. Children who grow up here cannot afford to live in Oro Valley as adults. There is a lack of adequately sized housing options for those who are interested in down-sizing Agreement with Housing Challenges Strongly Agree or Agree Among Those with an Opinion Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Elliott D. Pollack & Company Court, Merritt, Pollack, & Stevenson Residents highest perceived need are for more single family detached homes, followed by townhomes/duplexes, accessory dwelling units, condominiums, and apartments. Tiny homes, manufactured homes, and mobile homes/RVs scored lowest. 38% 13% 16% 13% 9% 7% 3% 2% 25% 27% 23% 23% 15% 8% 5% 63% 40% 39% 36% 24% 15% 8% 3% 0%20%40%60%80% Single-family homes Townhomes or duplexes Secondary residential units on an existing lot… Condominiums Apartments Tiny homes Manufactured homes Mobile homes / RV Parks Housing Needs in Oro Valley "4" and "5 -High need" 5 - High Need 4 Elliott D. Pollack & Company Court, Merritt, Pollack, & Stevenson Lower density rental products are most preferred by residents. 4-5 story apartments are least preferred. Elliott D. Pollack & Company Court, Merritt, Pollack, & Stevenson Elliott D. Pollack & Company Housing Analysis Sources Consulted: U.S. Census U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Arizona Office of Economic Opportunity WestGroup Research Oro Valley Citizen, Business Owner, and Employee Surveys RL Brown RealData, Inc. Pima County Assessor’s Office National Association of Home Builders U.S. Consumer Expenditure Survey Elliott D. Pollack & Company Court, Merritt, Pollack, & Stevenson Oro Valley has less housing diversity compared to Pima County and the state. Higher percentage of single family detached homes and lower percentages of traditional apartment communities and manufactured homes. Estimate %Estimate %Estimate % Total:23,458 467,191 3,056,890 1, detached 17,053 72.7%280,750 60.1%1,959,704 64.1% 1, attached 1,691 7.2%33,610 7.2%152,413 5.0% 2 184 0.8%8,252 1.8%39,593 1.3% 3 or 4 675 2.9%15,839 3.4%103,919 3.4% 5 to 9 964 4.1%16,993 3.6%119,475 3.9% 10 to 19 1,200 5.1%22,619 4.8%123,151 4.0% 20 to 49 514 2.2%16,935 3.6%76,510 2.5% 50 or more 925 3.9%24,065 5.2%167,599 5.5% Mobile home 234 1.0%46,668 10.0%302,822 9.9% Boat, RV, van, etc.18 0.1%1,460 0.3%11,704 0.4% Source: ACS 2021 5-year estimate Units In Structure Oro Valley Pima County Arizona Lack of apartments restricts low and moderate income households from finding housing locally. Elliott D. Pollack & Company Court, Merritt, Pollack, & Stevenson Similar occupancy rates in Oro Valley compared the region and State. Highest percentage of vacant homes classified as second/seasonal homes. Estimate %Estimate %Estimate % Total:23,303 470,132 3,082,000 Occupied 20,791 89.2%427,021 90.8%2,705,878 87.8% Vacant 2,512 12.1%43,111 10.1%376,122 13.9% Source: 2020 Decennial Census Oro Valley Pima County Arizona Occupancy Status Estimate %Estimate %Estimate % Total:2,512 43,111 376,122 For rent 606 22.4%12,989 26.1%86,906 23.3% Rented, not occupied 122 4.5%1,327 2.7%8,665 2.3% For sale only 296 10.9%4,630 9.3%31,309 8.4% Sold, not occupied 136 5.0%1,838 3.7%13,571 3.6% For seasonal, recreational, or occasional use 1,069 39.5%13,285 26.7%182,829 49.0% For migrant workers 1 0.0%19 0.0%915 0.2% Other vacant 282 10.4%9,023 18.2%51,927 13.9% Source: 2020 Decennial Census Oro Valley Pima County Arizona Vacancy Status Elliott D. Pollack & Company Court, Merritt, Pollack, & Stevenson Homeownership rates have declined in Oro Valley, countywide, and in the state over the past two decades. Oro Valley Pima County Arizona 2000 84.2%64.3%68.0% 2010 77.4%64.1%66.0% 2020 76.5%63.6%65.3% Source: Decennial Census Homeownership Elliott D. Pollack & Company Court, Merritt, Pollack, & Stevenson Household incomes have increased 21% from 2018-2021, higher than the county or state. Pima County Arizona Median Income 2018 $76,484 $51,037 $56,213 2019 $83,341 $53,379 $58,945 2020 $86,863 $55,023 $61,529 2021 $92,548 $59,215 $65,913 2018-2021 Change 21.0%16.0%17.3% Average Income 2018 $101,736 $70,610 $77,221 2019 $107,122 $73,554 $80,779 2020 $110,466 $75,662 $84,380 2021 $120,121 $80,772 $89,693 2018-2021 Change 18.1%14.4%16.2% Source: ACS 2021 5-year estimate Household Income Growth 2018 - 2021 Oro Valley Elliott D. Pollack & Company Court, Merritt, Pollack, & Stevenson Single family home prices have increased 57% in the last 4 years compared to 18% inflation. Condo/Townhome prices have increased 57%. Manufactured home prices have increased 62% (still a relatively affordable ownership option).When prices increase faster than inflation, it is an indication of a housing shortage. Elliott D. Pollack & Company Court, Merritt, Pollack, & Stevenson New Home pricing starts above $450,000. 59% of new home sales were priced between $500,000 to $650,000. An additional 30% ranged from $650,000 to $1 mil. Household incomes required to afford a new home in Oro Valley at current interest rates start at $136,700 for a $500,000 home and $177,700 for a $650,000 home. Stabilized interest rates (5%) would equate to $104,600 and $136,000, respectively. $400,000 $450,000 $500,000 $550,000 $600,000 $650,000 $700,000 $750,000 $800,000 1,600 1,850 2,100 2,350 2,600 2,850 3,100 3,350 House Sqft. COMPETITION PRODUCT GRAPH -Town of Oro Valley SOURCE: MAGIC PROFESSIONAL HOUSING AND LAND APPLICATION MERITAGE HOMES 80X165 BOULDER VISTA AT STONE CANYON - PERMITS 12 MONTHS / 0 PUSCH RIDGE PROPERTIES 30-50X80+ LA RESERVE VILLAS - PERMITS 12 MONTHS / 4 MATTAMY HOMES 65X120 ALTERRA AT VISTOSO TRAILS - PERMITS 12 MONTHS / 0 MERITAGE HOMES 55X130 SAGUAROS VIEJOS EAST - PHASE I/2 - PERMITS 12 MONTHS / 55 INSIGHT HOMES VAR LA CANADA RIDGE - PERMITS 12 MONTHS / 0 RICHMOND AMERICAN 70X125 VISTOSO HIGHLANDS - PERMITS 12 MONTHS / 0 D R HORTON 87X120 MILLER RANCH - PERMITS 12 MONTHS / 0 FAIRFIELD HOMES VAR STONE CANYON/BOULDER VISTA - PERMITS 12 MONTHS / 7 STONE CANYON CASITAS LLC VAR THE GOLF CASITAS AT STONE CANYON - PERMITS 12 MONTHS / 0 MERITAGE HOMES 60X120 VILLAGES AT SILVERHAWKE - PERMITS 12 MONTHS / 0 PULTE HOMES 50-60X120 RANCHO VISTOSO 5-H/TRANQUILO - PERMITS 12 MONTHS / 5 PULTE HOMES 50-60X120 RANCHO VISTOSO 5-W/5-X/CACTUS & CANYON/VALLEY VISTA - PERMITS 12 MONTHS / 0 PULTE HOMES 70X125 SHANNON 80/IRONWOOD ESTATES - PERMITS 12 MONTHS / 25 Elliott D. Pollack & Company Court, Merritt, Pollack, & Stevenson Affordability has declined to levels not seen since the housing bubble in 2006. Elliott D. Pollack & Company Court, Merritt, Pollack, & Stevenson Rents have increased 31% in the last 2 years. Quarter Properties Units Rent Vacancy Stabilzed 2020 Q4 14 3,146 $1,121 3.9% 2021 Q4 14 3,146 $1,453 3.4% 2022 Q1 14 3,146 $1,488 4.2% 2022 Q2 14 3,146 $1,495 6.3% 2022 Q3 14 3,146 $1,476 6.7% 2022 Q4 14 3,146 $1,483 7.1% 2023 Q1 15 3,210 $1,466 8.8%6.9% Source: RealData Oro Valley Apartments Floor Plan Units % Total Rent Avg. Size Rent/ SF Required Income Studio 24 0.7%$990 400 $2.48 $39,600 One Bedroom 1,187 37.0%$1,259 716 $1.76 $50,400 Two Bedrooms 1,692 52.7%$1,516 1,049 $1.44 $60,600 Three Bedrooms 307 9.6%$1,834 1,283 $1.43 $73,400 TOTAL 3,210 $1,466 943 $1.55 $58,600 Source: RealData Oro Valley Apartments Current Average Rents by Floor Plan: •Studio - $990 (required income: $39,600) •1-bedroom – $1,259 (required income: $50,400) •2-bedroom - $1,516 (required income: $60,600) •3-bedroom - $1,834 (required income: $73,400) Elliott D. Pollack & Company Court, Merritt, Pollack, & Stevenson Affordability by Occupation Monthly Monthly Pima County Affordable Affordable 2022 Median Housing Cost Rent Occupation Wage (30% of Income)(Less Utilities) Hotel, Motel, and Resort Desk Clerks $28,964 $724 $624 Retail Salespersons $29,677 $742 $642 Cooks, Restaurant $33,977 $849 $749 Nursing Assistants $35,430 $886 $786 Waiters and Waitresses $36,081 $902 $802 Construction Laborers $38,404 $960 $860 Firefighters $40,181 $1,005 $905 Pharmacy Technicians $41,828 $1,046 $946 Elementary School Teachers $45,943 $1,149 $1,049 Secondary School Teachers $48,477 $1,212 $1,112 Paramedics $49,673 $1,242 $1,142 Police and Sheriff's Patrol Officers $60,583 $1,515 $1,415 Licensed Practical Nurses $61,547 $1,539 $1,439 Registered Nurses $82,164 $2,054 $1,954 Source: Arizona Office of Economic Opportunity in cooperation with the Bureau of Labor Statistics, May 2023 Housing Affordability by Occupation Elliott D. Pollack & Company Court, Merritt, Pollack, & Stevenson Current Housing Gap by Income Level Pima Units % Total County Arizona Total Occupied Units 15,736 267,835 1,765,658 Less than $20,000 576 93.5%77.8%75.0% $20,000 to $34,999 393 36.3%49.4%48.0% $35,000 to $49,999 464 32.9%35.6%37.3% $50,000 to $74,999 428 22.3%18.0%22.3% $75,000 or more 702 6.6%3.9%4.7% Total Paying More Than 30% of Income 2,563 56,510 369,594 % Paying More Than 30% of Income 16.3%21.1%20.9% Source: ACS 2021 5-year estimate Pima Units % Total County Arizona Total Occupied Units 5,018 149,648 917,899 Less than $20,000 567 100.0%93.9%93.4% $20,000 to $34,999 637 98.9%80.3%85.1% $35,000 to $49,999 402 70.3%44.9%59.3% $50,000 to $74,999 265 30.2%20.1%28.1% $75,000 or more 127 6.2%3.1%4.6% Total Paying More Than 30% of Income 1,998 71,206 412,670 % Paying More Than 30% of Income 39.8%47.6%45.0% Source: ACS 2021 5-year estimate Percent of Owner-Occupied Households Paying More Than 30% of Income Towards Housing Costs by Income Range Percent of Renter-Occupied Households Paying More Than 30% of Income Towards Housing Costs by Income Range Oro Valley Oro Valley Elliott D. Pollack & Company Court, Merritt, Pollack, & Stevenson Housing Density helps support existing businesses and spur new commercial development Income & Spending Assumptions Dollars % of Income Dollars % of Income Required Income $74,800 $129,000 Total Retail Spending/HH (Excluding vehicles)$20,317 27.2%$27,297 21.2% Local-Serving Retail Spending $8,915 11.9%$11,324 8.8% Grocery Spending/HH $4,378 5.9%$5,321 4.1% Other Non-Grocery Local-Serving Retail Spending/HH $4,537 6.1%$6,003 4.7% Regional-Serving Retail Spending/HH $8,034 10.7%$11,345 8.8% Restaurant Spending/HH $3,367 4.5%$4,628 3.6% New Households 250 57 Supportable Local-Serving Retail Demand Demand Demand Total Grocery Spending $1,094,510 $303,303 Supportable SF at $500 Per SF in Sales 2,189 607 Other Local-Serving Retail Spending (excluding Groceries)$1,134,231 $342,155 Supportable SF at $300 Per SF in Sales 3,781 1,141 Restaurant Spending $841,780 $263,821 Supportable SF at $500 Per SF in Sales 1,684 528 Regional Serving Retail Spending $2,008,614 $646,667 Supportable SF at $500 Per SF in Sales 4,017 1,293 TOTAL LOCAL-SERVING RETAIL DEMAND 11,671 3,568 Sources: U.S. Consumer Expenditure Survey; AZ DOA; Elliott D. Pollack & Company Apartments Single Family Homes Retail Spending Analysis - New Residential Development Elliott D. Pollack & Company Court, Merritt, Pollack, & Stevenson Multi- Family: Four Story Apartment Multi- Family: Garden Apartment Single Family: Build to Rent Single Family: Small Lot Single Family: Move Up Single Family: Luxury Primary Impacts Sales Tax $104,700 $49,300 $30,300 $15,100 $13,700 $8,200 Lease Tax $204,700 $93,800 $59,300 ------ Utility Tax $30,800 $15,000 $8,900 $5,400 $4,300 $2,500 State Shared Revenue $314,700 $153,800 $90,900 $38,300 $25,500 $12,800 Secondary Impacts (employees) Spending Sales Tax $6,900 $3,300 $2,000 $1,600 $1,000 $500 State Shared Revenue $700 $300 $200 $100 $100 $0 Other Districts School District $484,500 $203,000 $120,000 $62,300 $55,400 $34,600 Total Tax Revenues $1,147,000 $518,500 $311,600 $122,800 $100,000 $58,600 Source: Elliott D. Pollack & Co.; IMPLAN; AZ Dept. of Revenue; AZ Tax Research Association Annual Fiscal Impact on Municipalities Land Use Comparisons on a 10-acre Site Town of Oro Valley (2023 Dollars) Housing Density also generates more revenue for the Town and school district. Elliott D. Pollack & Company Court, Merritt, Pollack, & Stevenson Recommendations •Support more rental products (single-family,townhomes,duplexes or 2-3 story apartments)in strategic areas and allow secondary dwelling units on existing lots. •Conduct a retail gap analysis to determine future commercial development potential.If warranted from the analysis,consider approving additional residential development on commercial parcels to create more demand for retail,balance land uses,and maximize commercial opportunities and town revenue. •Allow manufactured homes or similar affordable housing types in more areas.Although prices increased, manufactured homes are the most affordable ownership option in Oro Valley yet limited to one area. •Seek grant funding to support housing and supporting infrastructure (such as transportation)options. •Support carefully targeted subsidized housing programs targeting workforce level wage households (40%- 100%AMI)for multi-family housing to support police,fire,teachers,nurses,and other critical service providers in Oro Valley that are currently overburdened by housing costs. Town Council Meeting Regular and Study Session December 6, 2023