Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPackets - Council Packets (620)Council Meeting Regular Session December 6, 2017 1 Town Council Meeting Announcements 2 Upcoming Meetings 3 4 Council Report – Holiday Tree Lighting 5 6 Innovation Park General Plan Amendment Town Council December 6, 2017 7 Type 1 General Plan Amendment Purpose Change property from employment to residential use Existing: Commerce / Office Park Proposed: Medium Density Residential Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation Town Council Action SITE Oracle Road Rancho Vistoso Blvd. Tangerine Road 8 Big Wash Oracle Road Rancho Vistoso Blvd. Ventana Icagen 9 Applicant Concept 10 Residential Encroachment 1987: Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development Adopted East of Big Wash planned as major office/research park 1994: Oracle Road Scenic Corridor Overlay District Adopted 1996: Most of Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 2 converted to residential Due to zoning provision of ORSCOD 2002: ORSCOD Amended 2 3 Oracle Road Rancho Vistoso Blvd. Big Wash 11 General Plan Conformance Generally consistent with the vision, guiding principles, goals and policies of the General Plan and is evaluated for impacts to: Development character and land use patterns Infrastructure Public services Natural beauty and environment Appropriately addressed neighbor concerns as much as reasonably possible Contribution to long-term economic stability (non-residential) 12 Vision, Goals and Policies Amendment Criteria #1 Grow the number of high-quality employment opportunities Health and medical research industries Educational institutions Research/technical parks Visitor and tourist attractions Light industry Professional office complexes 13 Amendment Criteria #1 Land Use Analysis Innovation Park Area 12 projects built since 2000 10 acres average project size 51% of buildable land is developed or planned for development 20 year supply of land remains Innovation Park Area Oracle Road Tangerine Road 14 Land Use Analysis Amendment Criteria #1 15 Amendment Criteria #1 a. – d. Development character and land use patterns Makes transitions worse Infrastructure Public services Natural beauty and environment b. – d. to undergo more detailed analysis during rezoning Rancho Vistoso Blvd. Vistoso Commerce Loop Innovation Park Dr. Oracle Rd. 16 Land Use Patterns Amendment Criteria #1 a. ! Proximity issue ! Proximity issue Current Conditions 20 homes impacted Future Conditions 26 homes impacted Proximity issue for future commercial and industrial development 17 Amendment Criteria #2 and #3 2. Neighbor Concerns Land use and zoning Heights and views Open space and parks Site and home configuration Traffic and circulation Business and economic development Environmental issues 3. Economic Stability Change to residential land use would: Decrease economic benefits offered by a commercial land use Retail sales are similar for an office worker and resident 18 Key Factors and Recommendation Does not conform with the Your Voice, Our Future General Plan Economic growth Complete community Reduces the limited supply of Commerce / Office Park land available in Oro Valley Choices needed to attract employers Creates proximity issues for future residents and commercial and employment development Mixed support from nearby residents Impact to Economic Expansion Zone (EEZ) Does not help long-term economic viability The Planning and Zoning Commission and Town staff recommend denial 19 20 Tangerine North – State Land General Plan Amendment Town Council December 6, 2017 21 Good evening… Purpose Type 1 General Plan Amendment Planning boundary Master Planned Community Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation Town Council action Our purpose here tonight is to consider 2 requests related to the Tangerine – north property…a property OWNED BY THE STATE OF ARIZONA Planning Boundary MPC Two additional key points for tonight These apps are purely about amending the GP, does not connotate annexation or rezoning… This will be developed in the future, because the property is located at one of the primary entrances to the Town, we have a vested interest in making sure it is developed appropriately. These applications before you tonight will allow the Town to be part of any future conversations regarding development of the property. PZC recommend approval, subject to… - focused on: - need to a foundation for how the Town would like to see for the property be developed - app’s are focused on amending the GP 22 State of Arizona State of Arizona Subject Parcel Shannon Road Tangerine Road Coyote Crossing Trail Thornydale Road Moore Road Subject Property, located …. For reference, Tangerine Crossings Town of Oro Valley Town of Marana Everything outside is PC 23 General Plan Amendment Planning Area Master Planned Community N Moore Road Tangerine Road Thornydale Road Planning Area Shannon Road Coyote Crossing Trail Subject Parcel Planning Area 1st request = extension of the GP Planning boundary - what is the planning boundary? - identifies areas that have an impact on the Town and where we have a vested interest in how development occurs…TYPICAL TO INCLUDE PROPERTIES INSIDE/OUTSIDE THE TOWN LIMITS - Whether in the Town or not, these are areas where the Town wants to be part of the discussion regarding future development 2nd request = MPC to the property - holding designation which accommodates a range of uses to fit a specific property – focus of future rezoning…detailed planning will need to be done in the future to customize zoning for the property Neither of the 2 proposed changes will result in a change in ownership…STATE OF ARIZONA 24 Special Area Policies Master Planning Work with neighbors on compatible development Lot size transitions Buffers and landscaping Building heights Environmentally Sensitive Lands mapping Infrastructure MPC requires Special Area Policies which will inform more detailed future discussions regarding customized zoning for the property, which have been included in your packet. I want to make clear, these are not restrictions on the property, but rather the Town’s “ASK” as base considerations we’d like to see These policies: - developed with consideration of the key planning concerns for the property and thru feedback received at the neighborhood meetings. will help ensure the property is “well planned” regardless of jurisdiction. Master Planning w/Tangerine South Working with neighbors to minimize impacts and ensure development fits within the context of the area; tools to do that include: ESL mapping in the future Ensure infrastructure is developed in conformance with our Streets and Drainage criteria 25 Existing Development Rights Pima County General Plan Low Intensity Urban 0.3 91 homes Marana General Plan Low Density Residential 151 – 604 homes Potential commercial Pima County LIU 0.3. = up to 91 homes PC HAS MAPPED ENV. RESOURCES WHICH WILL SERVE AS A DRIVER TO SHAPE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT Marana LDR = 151 – 604 homes + potential neighborhood commercial - included the property in their planning area to ensure they had a seat at the table regarding any future development In the end, the ASLD will choose who to develop with. 26 Arizona State Land Department Mission “Ensure the highest and best use of State Trust Lands” History of property Oro Valley Town Limits Moore Road Tangerine Road Thornydale Road Shannon Road 640 acres Coyote Crossing Trail The property owner, ASLD, Has a mission that includes “ensuring the highest & best use of the property” for sale at auction to help fund the State Department of Education. Which again means the property will be developed at some point in the future. The subject property was part of the original section (640 acres) at the NE corner Previously approximately 316 acres were annexed by TofM which is now, Fry’s & Tangerine Crossing Subject property = the remainder 27 General Plan Conformance Generally consistent with the vision, guiding principles, goals and policies of the General Plan and is evaluated for impacts to: Development character and land use patterns Infrastructure Public services Natural beauty and environment Appropriately addressed neighbor concerns as much as reasonably possible Contribution to long-term economic stability (non-residential) GPA amendments are reviewed for conformance with the criteria onscreen, which I will go thru in coming slides 28 Amendment Criteria #1 “Well-managed Community that provides all residents with opportunities for quality living” Open space Transportation Drainage Environmental Resources Consistency with Vision, GP, goals & policies A quote from the Vision Planning Boundary & Special area policies will: Ensure the Town is part of future conversations and outlines the Town’s base considerations of what we’d like to see Ensure site is well managed = consistent with the above including: - open space - transportation - drainage 29 Amendment Criteria #2 and #3 2. Neighbor Concerns No development Natural open space and wildlife protection Roads, infrastructure and water Viewshed preservation Future plans for the property 3. Economic Stability Will be evaluated should the property develop in the Town 2) Three neighborhood meetings (2 traditional, 1 open house) No development Natural OS Roads, infrastructure Viewshed preservation Future plans 3) At this time no non-residential is proposed. Should there be in the future, necessary analysis will be conducted. 30 Key factors State Land mission “Well-managed Community that provides all residents with opportunities for quality living” Environmental resources Neighborhood concerns Infrastructure Water Neighborhood letters Key factors: ASLD mission (Highest/Best use) means the property will be developed These app’s, including the Special Area policies, ensure the Town is part of future discussions with our base considerations of: HELPS ENSURE THE SITE IS WELL MANAGED Env. Resources Neighborhood concerns Infrastructure Water Staff has received letters of both support & protest 31 Summary and Recommendation Expand the Planning Area Boundary and assign a Master Planned Community land use designation Request consistent with: Your Voice, Our Future General Plan Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval, subject to the Special Area Policies The request is to: Extend the Planning Area to include the property Assign a GP L/U designation of MPC THROUGHT THE PROCESS WE HAVE HEARD DISCUSSION REGARDING ANNEXATION/REZONING, AGAIN THE FOCUS FOR THESE APPLICATIONS IS AMENDING THE GP. The amendment is consistent with the YV,OF General Plan PZC recommends approval, subject to the SAP’s 32 33 Shannon Road General Plan Amendment and Rezoning Town Council December 6, 2017 34 Purpose Shannon Rd. Owl Vista Pl. Ironwood Ridge High School A. Type 2 General Plan Amendment Existing: Rural Low Density Residential Proposed: Low Density Residential 1 B. Rezoning Existing: R1-144 Proposed: R1-36 Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of both items, subject to conditions Two separate motions required for Items A and B Thank you. Applicant’s requests. 35 Ironwood Ridge High School Subject Property Custom Built Homes Custom Built Homes Naranja Dr. Shannon Rd. La Cholla Blvd. Owl Vista Pl. Subject Property Ironwood Ridge High School Casas Church N Orient ourselves. 36 A. General Plan Amendment Shannon Rd. Naranja Dr. Shannon Rd. School Rural Low Density Residential Low Density Residential 1 School Naranja Dr. Existing Proposed 37 General Plan Conformance Generally consistent with the vision, guiding principles, goals and policies of the General Plan and is evaluated for impacts to: Development character and land use patterns Infrastructure Public services Natural beauty and environment Appropriately addressed neighbor concerns as much as reasonably possible 38 A. Amendment Criteria #1-1a: Vision, Guiding Principles and Goals: Continuing to manage development and allow for compact development and flexible design options, including clustering… Development character and land use patterns: Significant buffer Appropriate transition School Lower Density Higher Density Naranja Dr. Shannon Rd. N 39 A. Amendment Criteria #1b-d: Infrastructure Improvements at the intersection of Shannon Road and Sahuaro Divide Sewer and water extensions at the developer’s expense Public services No adverse impact to public services Drainage improvements beyond code 40 A. Amendment Criteria #1d: Natural beauty and environment 66% of open space preserved Protection of environmental resources View preservation Low building heights Significant buffers 41 A. Amendment Criteria #2 Extensive public outreach: Two formal neighborhood meetings One on-site meeting Several neighbor led meetings Neighbor concerns: Amount of homes and neighborhood compatibility Building height and views Environmental conservation Setbacks Traffic at Shannon Rd/ Sahuaro Divide intersection Drainage to those west and south of the property Sewer extension to Shannon Road On-site meeting held on August 9, 2017 42 A. Summary Type 2 General Plan Amendment Rural Low Density Residential to Low Density Residential 1 Meets the General Plan amendment criteria 43 B. Rezoning Request R1-144 144,000 sq. feet Shannon Rd. School R1-36 8,750 sq. feet Existing Proposed Naranja Dr. 44 B. Tentative Development Plan (TDP) Compatibility Measures: 80 lots max All single story homes Larger lots placed along western perimeter Environmental conservation Open space owned and maintained by HOA Protected by the Town Setbacks 300’-450’ along western side 300’-600’ along southern side Traffic and drainage improvements School Shannon Rd. Owl Vista Place 300’ 300’ 600’ 450’ N New information: Density- reduced from 109 to 80 All single-story with a 23’ foot max for gable roofs 45 B. TDP- Traffic and Drainage Shannon Rd. Owl Vista Pl. Ironwood Ridge High School Shannon Rd. Owl Vista Place School Sahuaro Divide 3rd Neighborhood meeting. Prior concerns. 46 B. Flexible Design Options Reduce lot setbacks Minimum lot size and width Reduce required preservation amount of lower valued open space in exchange for preserving more than required of higher valued open space Building height raised for gable roofs School Shannon Rd. Owl Vista Place N New information: Density- reduced from 109 to 80 All single-story with a 23’ foot max for gable roofs 47 Key Factors Appropriate transition between land uses Extensive open space conservation Protection of environmental resources Significant buffer between surrounding homes and the proposed development Numerous letters and a petition opposing the request submitted by neighbors Includes considerable mitigation strategies to address residents' concerns Majority of neighbors most impacted are in concurrence with the mitigation strategies 48 Summary and Recommendation Requests meet both the General Plan amendment criteria and zoning analysis Preservation of open space Appropriate transition Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of both items, subject to conditions. Compatibility Drainage and traffic improvements Two separate motions required for Items A and B 49 50 Shannon 80 General Plan Amendment & Rezoning Town Council Hearing 12.6.2017 51 Entry Gate Design Restrictions 1-Story w/ Height Limits Shannon Rd. Turn Lanes 1/3-Ac. Lots along Western Edge Southbound Stormwater Flow Reduction Owl Vista Improvements No Impact to FEMA Floodplain Homes Clustered in Least Sensitive Portions of Site (for Environment & Neighbors) Significant Open Space Conservation Easement Significant Southern & Western Setbacks 52 ` 53 54 55 ` 56 57 58 Shannon 80 General Plan Amendment & Rezoning Town Council Hearing 12.6.2017 59 ` ` 60 61 62 ` ` 63 64 65 66 Big Wash General Plan Amendment and Rezoning Town Council December 6, 2017 67 Purpose A. Type 1 General Plan Amendment Remove Resort/Golf Course Apply and reconfigure Open Space, Park and Medium Density Residential (MDR) B. Rezoning Remove Commercial, Medium High Density Residential and Recreation Area/Golf Course Apply and reconfigure Open Space and Medium Density Residential Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval Town Council action 68 Moore Rd Big Wash Future Moore Road Tangerine Rd RV Blvd RV Blvd School Splendido Sun City Ventana Roche Subject Property (Yellow) Encompasses approximately 108 acres located north of Tangerine Road between RV Boulevard. Near the future Moore Road loop Bounded on the south by the future Amphi middle schools site (purple) To orient folks, you can see Safeway Hospital Splendido 69 General Plan and Rezoning Proposed Zoning Existing Zoning Commercial Rec/Golf MHDR Open Space MDR 70 Existing Versus Proposed Entitlements Proposed Zoning 71 General Plan Conformance Generally consistent with the vision, guiding principles, goals and policies of the General Plan and is evaluated for impacts to: Development character and land use patterns Infrastructure Public services Natural beauty and environment Appropriately addressed neighbor concerns as much as reasonably possible Contribution to long-term economic stability (non-residential) 72 Amendment Criteria #1 1. Vision, Guiding Principles and Goals: “The Town’s lifestyle continues to be defined by a strong sense of community, a high regard for public safety and an extraordinary natural environment and scenic views” Reduce developable area Better respect floodplain and adjacent uses Open space Mountain views not impacted Proposed General Plan Amendment 73 Commercial Rec/Golf MHDR Existing Zoning Compatibility a. Land use perspective: Less impact than commercial Moves development away from neighbors Better protects environment 74 Compatibility 2.0 DU/AC 3.83 DU/AC 2.1 to 8.9 DU/AC a. Design perspective: Similar design and density as surrounding neighborhoods Number of lots 421 lots permitted 408 lots proposed 166 lots (west) 242 lots (east) Mountain views not impacted Earth tone color roofs 75 1,000’ Moore Rd Big Wash Honey Bee Wash RV Blvd Arrowsmith Dr 76 50’ lower Western Property Line 1,000’ 77 850’ Del Webb Blvd Big Wash Honey Bee Wash RV Blvd Estates at High Mesa 78 Northern Property Line 100’ lower 850’ 79 Amendment Criteria #1b – 1c b. Infrastructure: Moore Road extension Sewer and water Floodplain c. Public service: No adverse impact to public services Better community park and trailhead Drainage better managed 80 1d. Natural Beauty and Environment 250-acres of developable area Open space: 119-acres 490-acres to Pima County Open space conservation Better drainage maintenance 81 Amendment Criteria #2 and #3 2. Neighborhood concerns: No development Environmental conservation Compatibility with surrounding neighborhoods View protection Suitability of roads 3. Economic stability: Retaining a commercial use intended for a golf clubhouse would not benefit community 82 Rezoning Request Tentative Development Plan 408 lots (166 west and 242 east) Minimum lot size: 6,000 sf Building height: 30’ Open space Access, sewer pump stations and floodplain removal Two parks and Big Wash Trailhead 83 Arrowsmith Drive Moore Rd. Roads, Sewer and Floodplain 84 Trails and Recreation 85 Key Factors Site can be developed under 30-year old development rights from Pima County Entitled: 421 lots and 250 acres of gradable area Improves existing design by: Proposed: 408 lots and 131 acres of gradable area Better respecting Big Wash Over 500-acres of natural open space dedicated to Pima County Conserves mountain views Adequate infrastructure Proposal contains several mitigation measures to address’ neighbor’s concerns 86 Summary and Recommendation Requests meet both the General Plan amendment criteria and zoning analysis Planning and Zoning recommends approval of both items A and B Two separate motions required for Items A and B 87 88 Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 5 General Plan & PAD Amendment OV1700534 Town Council Hearing 12.6.2017 89 Existing Your Voice Our Future General Plan Land Use Designations Proposed Your Voice Our Future General Plan Land Use Designations 90 Existing Rancho Vistoso PAD Zoning Classifications Proposed Rancho Vistoso PAD Zoning Classifications 91 92 93 94 95 96 From Estates at High Mesa (SSE) – As Currently Zoned 97 From Estates at High Mesa (SSE) – As Proposed 98 From Artifact Canyon (SE) – As Currently Zoned 99 From Artifact Canyon (SE) – As Proposed 100 From Hohokam Mesa (SE) – As Currently Zoned 101 From Hohokam Mesa (SE) – As Proposed 102 From Vistoso Hills (ESE) – As Currently Zoned 103 From Vistoso Hills (ESE) – As Proposed 104 From Bridal Veil Falls Rd. (NNE) – As Currently Zoned 105 From Bridal Veil Falls Rd. (NNE) – As Proposed 106 107