Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout9-7-16�a O CL CL O r -r C A ►Tj a rD O O CD O �'= rD rD x Unvy©q0N cn n CD fit. f4 tz A r* ' 4 n n rD o 0 CA bow ~:. 0 cn OeDft rD D 7' o 00o c� 04. �7 0 Md.7 •�' �O � n • P".No� � CD N�•oo�• A " rt , C •Ln `� 4 C1-, `.x co • GIS � • N • �P -tel (D cn o v, O � 0 �a O CL CL O r -r C A ►Tj a rD O O CD O �'= rD rD x o a. FEE o rD �c O cr O CO1. r) a �s pr r•,• O � • CD o � ►-I O � •o � 'CD � C CD n cn n CD fit. f4 tz A r* ' 4 n n rD o O OeDft rD o 00o c� o a. FEE o rD �c O cr O CO1. r) a �s pr r•,• O � • CD o � ►-I O � •o � 'CD � C CD n m C C" �o�� "c�F-,° �7""P . � C° 4 o 0 a •a0 m� o'0 cn CD 1" W CL o O �0 ' < < c �d a �, � � CD 4, CD Z �c (rp � . : • � rrf' to tc °� 0)n o �����x����,°� . OP 5a rt' �cra ^p NN�Q. O p' cin `C p' r* p O '0� N O . O' • cr } AQ rt rt A no CML c N > ;• �. to �- x 19 H On to Lq -P O J V co W A O 0) O O (J t 0) w in in to O in �L0� -� ° n o✓�0 t7� 0 rD �c n G 0 0 ro O crn ' C!) C -D o n O ° f�'-`•N O 0 CD � O 0 o a � aw W °oma. `°o��p C" �o�� "c�F-,° �7""P . � C° 4 o 0 a •a0 m� o'0 cn CD 1" W CL o O �' M _'��OO a� N - o c)O ma, O h ►� r., a �, � � CD 4, CD Z �c (rp � . : • � rrf' FQ A Or FII+ c c o r . °� 0)n �����x����,°� . OP 5a rt' �cra ^p NN�Q. O p' cin `C p' r* p O '0� N O . O' • loll AAA4 9 �o } AQ rt rt A no r A z rt CD r °°cn Aar �. Tv� Q. ° A ►s fD ° : • n p' rs n �. �j' �3 C ty rh �" v' cp C �t :: o -r �• J� O rbc Q-' fD CL `L7 't7 W v O O A ON9.0 rL c�op w Ir 40 CL 5 0 �: 0 i Stine, Michelle From: Standish, Michael Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2016 S:07 PM To: Town Council Cc: Keesler, Paul; Vella, Bayer; Sharp, Daniel; Stine, Michelle Subject: FW: Hi Mike -- I know it's late, 1 more? Mayor and Council, Please see the additional comments regarding A -frames below. Thank you. Mike Standish, CMC Town Clerk Town Clerk's Office Town of Oro Valley 520-229-4741 mstandish(a-),orovalleyaz.gov From: Dave Perry[mailto:dave@orovalleychamber.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2016 5:04 PM To: Standish, Michael <mstandish@orovalleyaz.gov> Subject: Hi Mike -- I know it's late, 1 more? In discussing A -Frames, The Golf Villas at Oro Valley Apartments on La Canada Drive and Oro Vista Luxury Apartments on Lambert Lane have previously used A -frames to increase traffic and ultimately leases. During the expansion of Lambert Lane I addressed the Town Council and requested additional exposure. It helped substantially to build awareness for potential residents. As you may recall, we erected a billboard on our land for Oro Vista to increase occupancy. Again when The Golf Villas underwent a multi-million dollar renovation, our clubhouse was inaccessible. Potential residents would drive in and turn around and leave because they didn't know where to find the leasing office. A -Frames were a critical addition to driving traffic to the leasing office. The higher our occupancy is, the more sales tax is generated to support the Town of Oro Valley. A Business with no sign, is a sign of no Business. Don't cripple the businesses that need your support. Sincerely, Kathleen Stupp Director of Sales I The Golf Villas 10950 N La Canada DrivelOro Valley, AZ 85737 (P) 520.498.0098 1 (F) 520.498.5150 kstuppAbutak.com goIfviIIasgpts.com Dave Perry President / CEO Greater Oro Valley Chamber of Commerce 7435 N. Oracle, Suite 107 Oro Valley, AZ 85704 Office: 520.297.2191 Fax: 520.742.7960 Email: dave(&,orovallevchamber.com Corporate Partners: to Hilton IFMI"I CL Cow"V, "SAW(k wr, & w4 V E N TA N '7A F Acadaff A Member qf the R"he Geoup A Iwa NOR H HEMITI, E CAR CARNO DEL SOL faux tf - � re ceq te r o aq di a ima er Vhntag.,W--o � iest CMUT URN CASA H L MR -7t Me 11 Lynch RI AIA M t de la Luz mgme"pwaca vkaffi MW &-w* of POW" C&- HOSPICE' Honey Bee Canyon Loop Trail Access As you are aware, the Estates at Honey Bee Ridge Homeowners Association has posted a sign in the power line easement stating that effective October 1, 2016 the access through that easement to the Honey Bee Canyon Loop Trail will be closed. With all due respect for the Estates at Honey Bee Ridge Homeowners Association, we question whether the HOA should have the unilateral power to make this decision. Clearly the interests of the Estates at Honey Bee Ridge Homeowners Association are very important, should be taken very seriously in determining the proper use of that easement, and any decision should not unduly impose on their neighborhood and their properties, but we believe the decision is also important to all citizens of Oro Valley and believe the decision should lie with the town of Oro Valley. The power line access is presently the only Oro Valley access to the Honey Bee Canyon Loop Trail, a very popular hiking and mountain biking trail on public State land. It is used by many Oro Valley citizens and is an important asset to Oro Valley. It has been used continuously since before any of the Honey Bee Ridge homes were built, and before the Association assumed the rights to govern the power line easement, and the easement is actually some distance from any Honey Bee Ridge home. We have been using the access to the Honey Bee Canyon regularly for the past several years, sometimes at night, and we have never observed ANY disrespectful use by either the hikers or the mountain bikers who use it. The public State land and the Honey Bee Canyon Loop Trail should have a proper trailhead and permanent access from Oro Valley, and one that serves all of Oro Valley equitably. Establishing one is long overdue. We request that the Oro Valley Town Council make it a priority. Respectfully Submitted, Larry & Connie Crum Oro Valley, AZ 85755 Mayor Hiremath and Members of the Town Council My name is Anthony Denaro residing at Canyon Drive. I am currently in New York dealing with a family medical issue. Wapa Trail #180 is located 18ft. from my property line. I would like to bring to your attention a couple of facts regarding the use of WapaTrail #180. There are a couple of facts why the traffic on Wapa Trail #180 has increased dramatically in such a short time. The Wapa Trail #180 was put on the internet explaining where to park on private property and not to worry about riding through two residential communities. The closing of Como Rd. access to State Trust Land redirected all of that traffic to Wapa Trail #180. The actions that will be taken by the Honeybee Ridge Estates HOA will only eliminate access to State Trust Land via Wapa Trail #180. The Edwin Rd. access is open to the public allowing all use of trails with ample parking. There are no residential communities in the area and the recreation public will have all of nature available to use as their toilet instead of public property. We the residences of N. Alamo Canyon Drive are supporting Michael Douglass and the Honeybee Ridge Estates HOA 100% on the actions that will be taken to restore our communities back to a peaceful and secure environment. Thank You Anthony Denaro September 7, 2016 Stine, Michelle From: Standish, Michael Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2016 1:21 PM To: Town Council x Cc: Keesler, Paul; Vella, Bayer; Diaz-Trahan, Kristy; Sharp, Daniel; Stine, Michelle; Sidles, Tobin Subject: FWD Town Meeting, Sept 7, 2016,Town of Oro Valley, Greater Tucson, Arizona, AZ 85704 Mayor and Council, Please see the comments below regarding Regular Agenda item #1. Thank you. Mike Standish, CMC Town Clerk Town Clerk's Office Town of Oro Valley 520-229-4741 mstandishCa-)orovalleyaz.gov From: Joe Hoagland [mailto Sent: Wednesday, September 0, 016 1236 PM To: Standish, Michael <mstandish@orovalleyaz.gov> Subject: Town Meeting, Sept 7, 2016,Town of Oro Valley, Greater Tucson, Arizona, AZ 85704 Good Afternoon, In regard to this evening's Town of Oro Valley, Greater Tucson, Arizona, AZ 85704, Town Meeting, Sept 7, 2016, please consider the following, thank you. Also note the two links provided at the very end: File: 20160907 Submission to Oro valley Town Council Members, prior to 7 Sep 2016 Town Meeting .docx 7 September 2016 Hi! :-) I am Steve Lan ford, a new york national residing for the past 35 years at . Dr, Oro Valley. I used to go regularly to town meetings and enjoyed getting to know Town Curmudgeon Orville Shields; Oro Valley Founder and Mayor Earl S. "Steve" Engel (who would greet me as "Steverino"); Oro Valley Founder, Historian, and Town Engineer James D. "Jim" Kriegh (with whom we shared two property lines); Town Clerk Town Clerk Kathi Cuvelier; Former Police Chief Fred Roof; Police Chief Werner Wolff (with whom I developed a strong friendship and working relationship); Steve Rennecker; and too many others to name here. I went to those Town Meetings both at the old Town Hall on Calle Concordia and at the temporary Town Hall on Oracle Road ... until, one night, I was the only member in the Audience when -- at something like 9:30 in the evening -- the Council went into Executive Session, which to me was an obvious violation of Open Meeting Laws. I did not take time to take the Council to court, but I did stop thinking that my views would make a difference, and I stopped going on a regular basis to Town Meetings. So, I come to this one (via this email) with considerable reservations and little hope that what I have to say will make a real difference. However, I have a deep concern for public and private safety. For instance, I had something to do with the fact that there are now seat belts on Amphitheater school buses. So when the question of whether or not a cell tower (first one and then how many others?) should be erected on the campus of CDO High School, I remember the meeting at the old Calle Concordia Town Hall when Amphitheater School District representatives promised to fit into this residential community as good neighbors. Is it being a good neighbor to put a cell tower near families in the neighborhood with children? What about the safety of students and staff at the school when inside buildings? What about when they are outside of buildings? What about when they are playing on fields under a cell tower, or swimming or attending events at the Aquatic Center? R 2 To answer such questions, I have tried to find recent, authoritative studies related to health risks and signal strengths at varying distances from cell towers. At http://www.electronicsilentspring.com/primers/cell- towers-cell-phones/cell-towers-health/) I find, in part: Cell Towers and Health How does living near a cellular antenna (a base station) affect health? — An excerpt from An Electronic Silent Spring Studies find that people living near a base station experience fatigue, headache, sleep disruption, irritability, depression, decreased libido, memory loss, dizziness, nausea, increased risk of cancer, tremors, loss of appetite, rashes, visual disruptions and overall discomfort. (1,2) People who live within 350 meters of a cellular antenna for more than a decade experience afour-fold increase in cancer rates. Among women, the increase is ten -fold. (3,4) People who live within 200 — 500 feet of an antenna report genetic, growth and reproductive effects; increases in the permeability of the blood -brain barrier; behavioral, molecular, cellular and metabolic effects; and an increased risk of cancer. (5) In Brazil, from 1996 to 2006, researchers tracked people who lived within 500 meters of a base station. They found 34.76 deaths by neoplasia (some kind of tumor) per 10,000 inhabitants. Outside of this area, a decrease in the number of deaths by neoplasia occurred: the greatest incidence was 5.83 deaths per 1000 people. (6) 3 Ire Israel, living near a cellular antenna for one year led to a dramatic increase of cancer. The increase correlates with previous data on significant increase in leukemia among people who live near broadcasting towers in Honolulu? and Hawaii. (8) Egyptian researchers found that long-term (six years) exposure to cellular antennas and mobile phones negatively impacts human hormone profiles: cortisol, serum progesterone (in females) and thyroid hormones are all affected. (9) After a cellular antenna was installed in Rimbach, a small town in Bavaria, Germany, sixty residents had their urine tested regularly over eighteen months, beginning in Spring, 2004. Participants' stress hormones (adrenaline and noradrenaline) increased significantly; their dopamine and phenylethyla mine levels decreased substantially. While participants maintained their usual lifestyle, they experienced increases in sleep problems, headaches, dizziness, concentration problems and allergies. Because chronic disruption of hormones damages health in the long run, researchers expect "major health problems" from long-term exposure to radiation from cellular antennas. (10) At another Web page (http://www.electronicsilentspring.com/wp- content/uploads/2014/01/10dec2013 EMRPI to Minneapolis Public Sc hools.pdf) I find a 10 December 2013, 5 -page letter from the President, the Vice -President, and the Director of the EMR [Electromagnetic Radiation] Policy Institute, to the Minneapolis Public Schools Board of Education, from which I have extracted the following excerpts: 4 • The FCC's current RF safety exposure limits are NOT sufficient to prevent thermal health effects for all subgroups of the population and DO NOT at all address today's almost ubiquitous exposures to wireless infrastructure from cell towers, WiFi, and wireless Smart Meters. • Based on the 2008 NAS [National Academy of Sciences] findings it cannot be asserted that US FCC RF safety policy protects all members of the public from all mechanisms of harm in all exposure scenarios. • De -K un Li, MD, PhD Senior Reproductive and Perinatal Epidemiologist at the Kaiser Foundation Research Institute said: "The bottom line is that the safety level for RF exposure related to non -thermal effect is unknown at present and whoever claims that their device is safe regarding non -thermal effect is either ignorant or misleading". • The Biolnitiative Report (www.bioinitiative. ) reviews more [than] 3,000 peer-reviewed published scientific papers that demonstrate biological effects and negative health effects resulting from RF radiation exposures at "non -thermal," i.e., low -intensity, levels. 5 • 0n January 19, 2012, The American Academy of Environmental Medicine ... [stated] that FCC guidelines are "inadequate for use in establishing public health standards." • EMRPI [the EMRadiation Policy Institute] supports biologically -based RF safety limits that are "as low as reasonably achievable" and are at least 100 times lower than present FCC RF safety limits. • It is illegal for those without a medical license to "practice medicine." People do not go to an electrician for a medical problem. The FDA does not allow the Chemical Industry to dictate doses and types of chemical medications. The FCC should not allow the Industry that benefits from emitting electromagnetic radiation to set the safety limits for this radiation, particularly in the face of evidence that this radiation interferes with biological processes in numerous harmful ways and interferes with the proper signaling of medical implants. • Numerous affidavits document that the Government is forcing unwanted EMR exposure on citizens despite their protests and documented injuries. Neither the Industry nor the Government has the right to "experiment" on the bodies of millions of Americans. •Autism rates have greatly increased as EMR emissions have increased. Autism spectrum disorders are linked to EMR/RFR [radio-frequency radiation] exposures physiologically.... These reports state that, "The evidence is sufficient to warrant new public exposure standards benchmarked to low -intensity (non -thermal) exposure levels now known 6 to be biologically disruptive, and strong, interim precautionary practices are advocated." ® FCC's current RF safety limits are inaccurate for protecting children. The FCC employs an exposure model equivalent to the shape of a 220 -Ib., 6 - feet 2 -inch tall male for compliance testing even though published research from the U.S., Japan, Spain, Brazil, France, and Switzerland proves that radiation absorption in children (including the pinna — [the part of the ear that resides outside of the head --Si_]) is two times higher than s • ® Final paragraph of the letter: For all these reasons EMRP I's urges the Minneapolis Public Schools and the Minneapolis Public Schools Board of Education to reverse your current policy that allows cell phone antenna siting on public school property in Minneapolis in light of your responsibility to ensure the health and safety of Minneapolis's public school students and personnel. School districts are not prohibited from making such decisions. Because you who act in this situation as our government are acting under color of law, without the personal bonds or other effective personal sureties (discounting insurance of questionable quality, purchased for you by your employer) of which I am aware; and because you are acting as employees of a corporation unlawfully imposing Admiralty law and not acting as representatives of the People with their feet on the land; you actually have no jurisdiction at all and might well become personally liable for any acts you take that are harmful to the FA health of residents of Oro Valley. I say this in no mean-spirited way, but to try to protect you from yourselves. You should closely consider these matters before too casually deciding to vote to permit the proposed cell tower. Not incidentally, the http://agenda.orovalleVaz.gov:8085/docs/`2016/TC/20160907 224/2081 %5FAttachment%208%20%2D%20Letter%20of%200biection.pdf Attachment Letter of Obiection that youposted leads to the broken URL rea : "Notice of p • for proposed - on existing stadium high school high pole in the Canyon Del Oro • SchooF.Please r -•. . page following i . • ensure that the hotlinks are working: https://scannedretina.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/update-6ju116- notice-of-disapproval-for-proposed-cell-tower-on-an-existing-stadium- high-school-high-pole-in-the-cannon-del-oro-high-school- egstationerypro.pdf have been in Connecticut since mid-April and could not attend your previous meetings on this critical matter. Because I have not had time to chase the questions as to who is behind this push for a cell tower on the CDO Campus and just what the imperative need may be; I must question why the health of the residential community is being put at risk for what seems to be an accommodation of somebody's profit motive. "Safety first!" was raised during an era in which public competition with private business was anathema, so I frown upon such public+private enterprises as you seem to be (in my opinion) too often engaged in these days. I am 1.1 hoping that a forensic accountant might become interested in giving OV CAFRs a very close look. Thank you for your close consideration of these matters. Because what I have had to say above is longer than I could possibly read during a possible call to the audience this evening, I am taking the liberty of sending this to Town Clerk Mike Standish, who has kindly promised to distribute it to you before you vote. To ensure that this email becomes part of the public record, I am forwarding it to scan nedretina.com and to several other interested parties. Please vote to deny erection of the cell tower in question and please pay much closer attention to the downside of public+private enterprises, which seem to encourage corruption. We have enough of that already throughout America. Sincerely, -Steve Langford - Town of Oro Valley Greater Tucson, Arizona, AZ 85704 9 For the public record regarding this evening's Town Meeting, please add to that references to both URLs: https://scannedretina.com/2016/09/07/07sep16-public-notice- submission-to-oro-valley-town-council-members/ i https://scannedretina.files.wordpress. com/2016/09/07sep16-public- notice-submission-to-oro-valley-town-council-members- egstationerypro.pr) df And please confirm your receipt of this email. Thanks for your kind help and understanding, Mike. -Steve- Sincerely submitted for inclusion in the record..., Joe Hoagland I 10 Stine, Michelle From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Mayor and Council, Please see the comments below. Thank you. Mike Standish, CMC Town Clerk Town Clerk's Office Town of Oro Valley 520-229-4741 mstandish@orovalleyaz.gov Standish, Michael Wednesday, September 07, 2016 1:15 PM Town Council Keesler, Paul; Vella, Bayer; Diaz-Trahan, Kristy; Sharp, Daniel; Stine, Michelle; Sidles, Tobin FW: Honeybee Trail Access -----Original Message ----- From: Sean Cox Sent: Wednesday, !Rptember 07, 2016 12:27 PM To: Standish, Michael <mstandish@orovalleyaz.gov> Subject: Honeybee Trail Access Hello Mr. Standish. I am writing on behalf of the council meeting tonight regarding access to Honeybee Canyon. I am a passionate mountain biker and a relatively new resident of Oro valley still coming from Lake Tahoe. I work for the US Forest Service and have a fairly good grasp on private landowner issues versus public access. Unfortunately, I also suffered a flat tire by riding through what I perceive as " booby trap " of nails last Spring. I am writing not to seek sympathy for the broken bike components, but for the access to remain open to my favorite trail to ride in the area. Although the HOA voted to restrict access , it is my hope that they can come before those of us who use the trail and come to a mutual agreement on how to best use the trail while also being mindful of the proximity the trail is to homeowners. Coincidentally I am also in the market for a new home and wanted to live on in this specific area due to the access to the trail... Now I am not so sure I want to be around it or the attitudes that would want to restrict public access to the outdoors. lease share as appropriate at the meeting... Thank you. Sean cox t from my iPad Stine, Michelle From: Standish, Michael Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2016 11:25 AM To: Town Council Cc: Keesler, Paul; Vella, Bayer; Diaz-Trahan, Kristy; Stine, Michelle; Sidles, Tobin Subject: FW: To the Town Council - Honey Bee Trail Mayor and Council, Please see comments below regarding the Honey Bee trail. Thank you. Mike Standish, CMC Town Clerk Town Clerk's Office Town of Oro Valley 520-229-4741 mstand ishp_orovalleyaz.gov From: EC [ Sent: Wednes ay, eptember 07, 2016 11:10 AM To: Standish, Michael <mstandish@orovalleyaz.gov> Subject: To the Town Council - Honey Bee Trail To the Oro Valley Town Council, Re: the Honey Bee Mountain Bike Trail System We would like to add our names to those other people who are users of the Honey Bee Mtn bike trail system. We were very disappointed to hear about the decision to close access to the trail beginning Oct. 1, 2016. This is a beautiful trail system that we use quite often, along with guests that visit us and come to ride the trail. This kind of trail system is not found in many places. Many of us have lived in other cities, and we can't think of another trail this nice, and this close to a town/city. It's a great Oro Valley gem used by cyclists, runners and hikers, that should be protected, not closed down. It's another part of Oro Valley that makes this area such a fantastic place to live. We respectively request that the Town Council find some way to continue access so that all the users of this great trail system can continue to enjoy it. Thank you for considering out request. Sincerely, Eliot Cobb Mary Jo Bair Tom Boehmer Linda Tarte Tim Tarte Barbara Hedgecock Nora Treadway Lori Jones Sherilen Cox Federica Rabiolo Virus -free. www.avast.com Stine, Michelle From: Standish, Michael Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2016 1:06 PM To: Town Council Cc: Keesler, Paul; Vella, Bayer; Sharp, Daniel; Stine, Michelle Subject: FW: 2 more on A -frames 090716 Mayor and Council, Please see the additional comments regarding A -frames below. Thank you. Mike Standish, CMC Town Clerk Town Clerk's Office Town of Oro Valley 520-229-4741 mstand ish(a orovaIleyaz.gov From: Dave Perry[mailto:dave@orovalleychamber.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2016 11:37 AM To: Standish, Michael <mstandish@orovalleyaz.gov> Subject: 2 more on A -frames 090716 Hi Mike, Two more late comments on A -frame signs. Your help with distribution to council and staff is appreciated. I recognize it's getting late; hard copy is fine, too! Take care, Dave AZ Beds LLC 7881 N Oracle Rd Oro Valley AZ 85704 To: Oro Valley Town Council I would like to ask for your consideration to make A -Frames a permanent allowance for businesses in Oro Valley. As a small business which does not have great visibility from the road, the A -Frame use allows me to show potential customers of my existence. The layout for strip malls are not very visible to the majority of consumers driving down Oracle rd (in my situation) who are driving into to Tucson to find goods and services. The majority of my customers have never heard of me, although I have been open for four years, advertise on TV and print and network and sponsor local events. My other unique situation is that although we have a non -compete clause in our lease, our shopping center has multiple owners and I have a direct chain -store competitor two doors down from my store on the newly developed endcap and with much better visibility than my current store. Having the A -Frame properly placed along with my monument sign will hopefully direct a small share of traffic to my store, thus giving my business a fighting chance. Thank you for your time and vital consideration of this matter. Respectfully, Jeff Saunders I reached out to our Oro Valley Store and we believe that being able to have A -frames or flags to promote our store and store events would be beneficial to us. The Goodwill Oro Valley store is located in the middle of a shopping plaza where we don't have a strong street presence and we find that unless a person already knows we are there, potential customers may not even realize that we have a location in that shopping center. Being able to direct potential customers as they are driving on La Canada or Lambert Lane would not only help our sales so we can continue to support our mission and our employees at the store; but we would also be able to direct people to our attended donation center which is conveniently located. Thank you! Judith B. Simmons Director of Marketing Goodwill Industries of Southern Arizona Dave Perry President / CEO Greater Oro Valley Chamber of Commerce 7435 N. Oracle, Suite 107 Oro Valley, AZ 85704 Office: 520.297.2191 Fax: 520.742.7960 Email: davegorovalleychamber.com Corporate Partners: Ari�nna i ttj stir ``EE Hilton .� W v I -ON U COr %VY3 ATA vopd , C,01,F & 'iFNNI5 RESCD0; �7 V E N T ��$- Acadaff 2 TLTH- C ARE Nmm al W Center ky K60�1 P H Name eldest Feral relit hal �C r7 UNION, CASA M, Merrill Lynch adetaLu-v.�..y 040 Manage Stine, Michelle From: Standish, Michael Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2016 1:20 PM To: Town Council Cc: Keesler, Paul; Vella, Bayer; Sharp, Daniel; Stine, Michelle Subject: FW: more A -frame comments 090616 Mayor and Council, Please see the additional comments below for tomorrow night's meeting. Thank you. Mike Standish, CMC Town Clerk Town Clerk's Office Town of Oro Valley 520-229-4741 mstandish@orovalle ay z.gov From: Dave Perry[mailto:dave@orovalleychamber.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2016 12:58 PM To: Standish, Michael <mstandish@orovalleyaz.gov> Subject: more A -frame comments 090616 Hi Mike, I hope you're well, and cool. Last week, I sent individual e-mails to council members with comments from business people concerning A -frame signs. I have received more, and would ask please that you distribute them to staff and council alike ahead of Wednesday night's meeting. Thanks as always for your help. Dave Members of council Staff Friends, Ahead of Wednesday night's A -frame sign consideration, please find additional comments from business owners and managers regarding the use of A -frames. Thanks for your consideration. See you Wednesday. Dave Rubs Massage Studio in Oro Valley has a large quantity of people see our A -frame and come into the studio to schedule appointments. Signage accounts for roughly 1/3 of our business. The A -frame is a much needed visual that contributes greatly to our revenue. Thank you! Melissa Yunger Studio Manager Rubs Oro Valley 10580 N La Canada Drive From The Tutoring Center ... Here are a couple of points about A frame signs. We use our for grabbing the attention of our customers. The customers that will say "I didn't know you guys were in here." People in our shopping center generally aren't looking at the signs above. We obviously want to grab their attention. Our store front signs are nice but very close together. They also don't give information about our services. They are also great for our drive-by traffic. All of the Walmart traffic driving through. The parts store traffic. I have received a couple customers from the A frame sign. Customers stopping in at the parts store see our A frame sign and come check us out. We have them placed in a safe secure spot. They are not in the way or unsafe. Raymond Smith The Tutoring Center Oracle and Magee From The Gaslight Music Hall ... To Whom it may concern: I 've recently become aware that the issue of A -frame signs has come before the council, and I'd like to open by saying thank you for your willingness to take the matter under consideration. In addition to being an effective and relatively low-cost solution for business owners, I strongly believe that the format is one of immense benefit to the town. It provides a low-key and non - intrusive means for promoting the wide variety of businesses, services, and non-profit organizations that enrich our community. While other regions are littered with billboards, banners, and gaudy signage; an A -frame is a classy, non-descript, and oftentimes creative alternative that serves to enhance (rather than detract from) the landscape. I can say unequivocally that our businesses (the Gaslight Music Hall and Grandma Tony's Pizza) have benefited from the use of A -frame signage. During the first several weeks after our opening, it was our only outdoor identifying feature and it made a huge difference in our audience's ability to locate us. Even after we posted larger and more prominent signage, having a street -level presence is an immense benefit, especially in the shopping center layout in which our companies reside. It's a clean, attractive, and unobtrusive asset that fits seamlessly within town's culture and aesthetic. I would like to encourage you to make the right decision for Oro Valley and its many wonderful businesses and organizations and make this ideal signage solution a permanent one. Thank you. Best, -Robert Shaw z CEO I Executive Producer LONELY STREET PRODUCTIONS Producer I Artistic Director GASLIGHT MUSIC HALL From Framed to Perfection ... Our A frame is the only sign we have besides our store front sign to apprise our customers of our location. It provides customers with the ability to recognize which area of the center we are in and directs walk-in traffic. Our A frame sign provides customers with the ability to know easily which right turn (there are 3) in the parking area we are located. With Smashburger right next door we have experienced an increase of traffic and it is important that we help our customers to know exactly where we are to minimize congestion and potential accidents. We were unable to get a spot on the monument signs on Oracle. Our storefront sign cannot be seen from Oracle due to the overgrowth of trees ... They have not been trimming these trees for more than a year. Last year Framed to Perfection paid to have them trimmed. Since we moved across from Sprouts it is very important for our long time customers who may not have visited in a while to know we are still in business. The A frame sign is a definite help in pointing them to our current location when otherwise they think we may have closed our doors. Once a month we have an event featuring a local artist which supports the local art scene and we need our A frame to direct new people to our Gallery for this event. Finally, our A frame sign is tasteful and attractive. Katrina West Framed to Perfection 7625 N. Oracle Rd. #125 Tucson, AZ 85 704 From BrakeMasters ... ... we are generating tax revenue, creating jobs, and operating a stellar business model with an A+ BBB rating and an unbelievable 5.0 GOOGLE rating. At this point many of our new customers and/or snow birds frequently mention how difficult it was for them to locate us. I have knowledge that we have lost many customer simply because of their difficulty in finding us. A few years ago when a temporary sign modification regulation was put into effect, we at Brake Masters signed up for that. That being said, the modified ordinance really didn't help us that much, it gave me the ability to place a small A frame sign no further that 20 feet from our front door. In our case, that was behind some prickly pear cactus or behind a mesquite tree, either of which don't allow the public to see our signs? It would be awesome for the ordinance to be revamped and to have the business perspective acknowledge and considered when the sign rules are updated. I would suggest allowing A frames signs in some cases greater than the 20 foot restriction, an avenue for certain sign exceptions, the allowance of sign spinners and balloons and a little more sympathy for the business and less stringent enforcement within reason. Alan Tames Manager BrakeMasters 645 E. Vuelta Caminata del Oro Dave Perry President / CEO Greater Oro Valley Chamber of Commerce 7435 N. Oracle, Suite 107 Oro Valley, AZ 85704 Office: 520.297.2191 Fax: 520.742.7960 Email: davegorovall eychamber.com Corporate Partners: Hilton TUC -W-4 CL CO W-04J,iii R - GOLF & T*'"ts' RESORT 4- V E N T A N A!" Acaaaff Nbc&-wca Wkal C-knrer Oro Valk y t a I -d WARE Jam1me-dia NORTHUTSTREALT. DEL MAN 5911-YOWWW PNOWMW RESOKII Hn es Van_a g4 W -, 6� t Fal Credit g IT UNION' TMerCASA, H 1 L Sen Merrill Lynch de la Luz % f- kg Wea, ft tug,- 'flt ft �Me ftwom r-c-a-w-aticon %% -11%" HOSPICE- Stine, Michelle From: Standish, Michael Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2016 1:27 PM To: Town Council Cc: Keesler, Paul; Vella, Bayer; Sharp, Daniel; Cornelison, Chris; Sidles, Tobin; Stine, Michelle Subject: FW: Honeybee trail 9-7 Town Council agenda Mayor and Council, Please see the comments below from Damion Alexander. He and others are preparing to address this item tomorrow night at Call to Audience. Thank you. Mike Standish, CMC Town Clerk Town Clerk's Office Town of Oro Valley 520-229-4741 mstandish orovalleyaz.gov From:oil ailto: Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2016 1:09 PM To: Vella, Bayer <bvella@orovalleyaz.gov> Cc: Standish, Michael <mstandish@orovalleyaz.gov>; Diaz-Trahan, Kristy <kdiaz-trahan@orovalleyaz.gov> Subject: RE: Honeybee trail 9-7 Town Council agenda Michael, Please forward this to the mayor and council for tomorrows meeting. I have asked people to show up for the call to the audience and so far on Facebook over 100 have said they will be attending and over 200 have shared the post with over 20,000 being reached with the message. While many will want to speak, I'm hoping that by speaking first I can voice the concerns of those in attendance. The Cliff Note Version The issue: A HOA, in the area of the WAPA Easement to the State Trust Land north of Honeybee Canyon and Sun City, is asserting that they have the right to close the easement. They are saying it will be closed as of October 1, 2016. *This State Land has been used since the early 1990s, before any development was in the area. The intent when homes were put in was for an access point to remain open for recreational users. It has been used this way continually since then. *The HoneyBee Trail network, accessible via this easement, is a popular community asset used by Oro Valley residents, families, kids, professionals, bicyclists, hikers, walkers, outdoorsmen, and tourists. The Solution: The town of Oro Valley needs to address this access issue immediately and help the Public find a way to protect the existing WAPA Easement or create a new access point to the State land, as well as allow for adequate parking and facilities nearby. The Novel Honeybee Trails, also known as Rail X Ranch to those who have been continually using this trail network for over 20 years, is located in Oro Valley Arizona. It has been featured by Visit Tucson, and national publications. It is a huge draw for southern Arizona. It is unique in the Tucson region because it provides the best trails for beginner cyclists, but is fun and challenging for riders of all skill levels. The scenery is spectacular with some of the most gorgeous rock outcroppings and a blend of Sonoran and high Desert with a backdrop of the Tortolita and Catalina Mountains. With its proximity to Sun City, Innovation Park Dr. and Rancho Vistoso it is just as likely to see a retiree as an employee from Ventana Medical Systems or a family from Rancho Vistoso. The Oro Valley High School Mountain Bike team use the trail 3-4 days a week for their practices. It is also used by Trail runners and hikers Almost everyone who accesses this incredible community asset does so off of Rancho Vistoso Blvd at Quite Rain dr. There is a WAPA powerline easement with a dirt road that leads to the state land and the trail system. The land is owned by The HoneyBee Canyon Home Owners Association, but has been used by recreational outdoor enthusiasts for well over 20 years, before the Honeybee Canyon development was conceived and long before any homes were built. In Fact, there is a note in the development plans that discloses a development agreement that states when the subdivision is built out to 40%, trail improvements will be applied to that specific area. The recorded Plat contemplates the trail for recreational purposes, and also that as part of the development arrangement, it was fully understood by the developer who created the HOA that the development was contingent upon the trail and they should be required to keep their agreements. As a real estate agent I have a great appreciation for private property rights. Also as a Realtor, I see the direct impact that public space and access to these amenities has on property values. In Southern AZ tourism is a 2.2 to 2.7 Billion, Billion with a B, annual impact on the economy. According to statistics from various sources, outdoor recreation is at the top of the list for why people visit our community. That number does not include the visitors who decide to move here, who buy homes, creating income for Realtors, title companies, home inspectors, lenders, interior decorators, eat in our restaurants, as well as patients for dentist and doctors. Many of these people own businesses and the lifestyle is the deciding factor in relocating to Tucson. These people pay the taxes that build our roads, pay for our police and fire and other daily services provided by our county and city government. This fuels our economy and pays many of our bills. A few years ago the home owners in Sun City, led by some very passionate home owners started a campaign to shut down access to the trail. The concern, which was very justifiable, was motorized vehicles were using the easement. It was loud, smelly and had a profounq impact on the home owners enjoyment of their property. Gates were installed and signs stating motorized vehicles were prohibited by Oro Valley Ordinance were installed. HAever, the homeowners did not stop the attack on access after the ATV and motorcycles were banned. At least two cyclists have said they have been threatened, to the extreme where the homeowner brandished fire arms and said that "this was not going to end well if they continued to use the trail." Many others have been verbally assaulted. When that did not stop people from using the easement„ the home owners started a campaign to shut down the main parking lot used by the trail users at Mountain View Plaza on the corner of Rancho Vistoso and North Sun City Blvd. While this was an inconvenience and trail users were forced to park at the HoneyBee Trail head or the park and ride 2 miles away or take the risk of being towed. This was particularly challenging for families with young kids and less fit riders, but it did not deter most riders from accessing the trails. 1 can't say with certainty, but it appears the Sun City homeowners started to pressure the Honeybee HOA to restrict access. While the trail does run close to the Sun City homes, The trail is on the Honeybee HOA property and the sun city residences have not legal rights to stop access in any way. It appears that either because the HoneyBee HOA are trying to be good neighbors or are tired of listening to the Sun City residents they have opted to restrict access. The homes in Honeybee Canyon are on gigantic lots and most of the trail is hundreds of yards from any of the 21 houses that are adjacent to the WAPA easement. The trail also has thick desert vegetation on both sides and on most parts of the easement you can't see homes, and vice versa. I have seen some reports that give the impression that the trail is right behind the homes, but this is clearly not accurate. This spring, when signs went up with rules for accessing the State Land via the WAPA easement, Hank Rowe of Sonoran Desert Mountain Bicycles and I attended a Honeybee Canyon HOA board meeting. We were very clear that we would do whatever they wanted to help ensure the access remained open. We offered to print additional signage coming from the cycling community as we felt that it might be better received. We volunteered to come out on weekends and talk with trail users, or to do whatever they requested. We asked for specific behaviors we could address. In all cases they did not take us up on any of these offers. In August, the gate was ripped down. This was likely done by an ATV. The next morning I called the HOA president and personally offered to pay to have a new and better hate installed on behalf of the cycling community. Again, the offer for cooperation and assistance was not accepted. Last week a new sign went up that said the trail access will be shut down as of October 1, 2016. Once again, the HOA was called and the offer to do whatever was necessary to preserve access was offered. The response was that they have made up their mind, that their lawyers have determined they have a legal right to do so, and this conversation was over. No specific reason was given as to what was the "final straw". The question is what we do now. What is clear is that Oro Valley needs to create a suitable trail head and access to the trails. The land to the West of Honeybee Estates seems like it is the best option as the city owns a 600 foot easements up the wash. However, this area has significant cultural assets and the terrain may make it difficult to put in a trail that does not back up to the homes on the West side of HoneyBee Canyon Estates. On Oracle road where the new wildlife bridge is may offer another possibility, but it would require crossing Big Wash and would make it dangerous and unusable during monsoons. Edwin road is option 3, but this requires a long drive in the car and down a dirt road. None of these other trails would be as convenient and as beneficial to the community as the existing trail. And only access off Rancho Vistoso Road would enable residents to bike to the trailhead, as many do now, which decreases the required trailhead infrastructure (parking and bathrooms) takes vehicles off the road (alleviating traffic, wear and tear, and providing safe access for youth and those without a car). I have asked people to show up at the Oro Valley Town Hall meeting on September 7th and to speak at the call to the audience. What I'm hoping to hear are level headed people talking about the importance of this trail to the community from the physical fitness, family time, school sports, economy, tourism, and lifestyle. We need to ask the Town Council to find another access point to the trails.. While the HOA may be in their legal rights, I question if this is the Right thing to do to. With enough public pressure, perhaps they will change their position until a new access and trail head are developed. As parking is also an issue, I'm hoping the town will look at a trailhead with bathrooms and parking that is sufficient to accommodate all of the community who use this treasure. From: Vella, Bayer [mailto:bvella a orovalleyaz.gov] Sent: Tuesday, September 06 2016 12:27 PM To: Cc:andish, Michael; Diaz-Trahan, Kristy Subject: FW: Honeybee trail 9-7 Town Council agenda Hi Darrion, Good to chat with you on the phone today. Mike Standish, Town Clerk, can accommodate your request to send written comments to Town Council. Please send them directly to his email (address above). Also, if you still wish to use PowerPoint or a video as part of your 3 minute Call to the Audience presentation -- I am sure Mike can assist you with that as well. Looking forward, Bayer Vella, AICP, LEED AP OV Planning Manager Ph: 229-4810 Stine, Michelle From: Standish, Michael Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2016 11:37 AM To: Don Bristow Cc: Stine, Michelle Subject: RE: Council Packet Thanks Don. I'll forward this to Council. Mike Standish, CMC Town Clerk Town Clerk's Office Town of Oro Valley 520-229-4741 mstandish@orovalleyaz.gov From: Don Bristow [mailt Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2016 9:43 AM To: Standish, Michael <mstandish@orovalleyaz.gov> Cc: Stine, Michelle <mstine@orovalleyaz.gov> Subject: Council Packet Mike, Please insert the two attachment in the Council's agenda packets for the September 7, 2016 meeting. They are to be inserted with Regular Agenda items 2b and 3b. They are identifies as such. Thank you, Don Donald Bristow 1 Good morning Elisa, Thank you for taking time to meet with Don and me about the YVOF concerns which we mentioned at the August 23, 2016 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. just finished the reading the Planning & Zoning Commission Staff Report for the September 6, 2016 meeting and feel the need to share some concerns. First, I have a comment on page 2, paragraph 5, and beginning with "The 40 acre threshold..." The wording about after the public comment period and subsequent Development Sub -Committee and "All -committee" meeting allows one to assume all 3 committees finalized the increase from 20 to 40 acres. That assumption would be false, as that item was never discussed by the 3 committees, and was only discussed when we broke into the individual committees. My next comments pertains to "small town" on pages 2 and 3. Believe me, since our meeting, I have thought about this all day and into the night, and must reiterate what I said during our meeting Thursday. When the 2016 version came out, I spend a lot of time going through that version comparing it to the 90% version, looking for revisions/changes. Knowing the Vision and Guiding Principles could not be changed, as they had already been endorsed by Council on May 71 2014, 1 missed the actual changes Staff made. Each committee used the Vision and Guiding Principles as the foundation of our work. We were tasked to stay on track with them. At the P&Z meeting, you stated the specific actions which were developed go all the way back to the Vision and Guiding Principles and line up with the Plan's goals and policies. During the 60 -day comment period, a P & Z Commission member, another committee member, and I requested simple changes to the Guiding Principles such as beginning each bullet -point with a verb, or adding/deleting a word here and there. On the large 60 -day comments sheet, these suggestions/requests had this Action/Response: No Action - formed out of extensive community outreach, adopted by Town Council and serves as foundation of General Plan. Also, each had this Follow -Up: No Action - formed out of extensive community outreach, adopted by Town Council and serves as foundation of General Plan. I strongly agree that the Vision and Guiding Principles were formed out of extensive community outreach, already adopted by Town Council and served as the foundation for all of our work on the General Plan. Therefore, Staff should not have changed any wording within the Vision and Guiding Principles. As the Staff Report further states, the Your Voice survey include insight into the community preferences. When asked "What do you value most about living in Oro Valley?", included in the Your Voice surveys' top four answers were these two; sense of community and that it's peaceful and laid back. These two responses which led to the use of "small town feel." Further in the Staff Report, the ten direct survey quotes community members included "Friendly people, small town feel," "Small community feel," and "Small town feeling." Small town feeling includes every other direct quote. One can picture a "small town feeling." Again, I must say this. I am not comfortable with the change from "small town" to "neighborly" or "unique." Each of those terms are vague do not convey a feeling the community members desire. It is difficult to visualize "neighborly" or "unique." It seems to me that these two words are generic terms used by city planners. As you mentioned at the beginning of our meeting, I can and will bring this up at the Your Voice, Our Future Public hearing during the September 6, 2016 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. Thank you for your time and assistance. Warm regards, Diane I of 2 Town Council Meeting September 7, 2016 Regular Agenda Item 2b Responses to Staff's Cited General Plan Analysis for A -Frame Signs The proposed Code Amendment isn't consistent with the current or proposed new General Plan Community Design — Key Policy Issues — Signage "Increased commerc Y ial activity has added signage throughout the Town. Signage control have to balances" ala ers" citizens concerns about the increasing level of signage with the needs of businesses to attract custom Response: Policy was observed until 2011. After 2011 signage has increased in size, number, locations, and colors. The actions of Town staff and elected officials have given little to no concern for citizens desires: Ignored the citizen's survey that rejected the use of A -Frame signs • Ignored the multi -functional sign taskforce's recommendation to h prohibit A -Frame signs A -Frame signs Ignored the initial recommendation of staff to continue e Acted to accept the temporary use of A -Frames based on the input of one restaurant ownerfiled. The furniture store owner stated and later one furniture store owner. Both businesses fa her business failed due to a flawed business plan. The business stakeholders have never presented any verifiable evidence that A -Frame signs are necessary to heir sales, profits, and sales tax generation. They and the Chamber only make the same u mess from using increase t unsupported claims as the two owners of the failed businesses. In some cases, the claimed an A -Frame sign are due to usages beyond identification and direction. Policy 2.1.10 of current General Plan, Focus 2020 The Town shall create standards for signage to provide information and dire= to allow businesses to attract and maintain customers with the least intrusive signage possible". ossible". Rooney Center is a A -Frame signs and their allowed locations fail to meet "Least intrusive which results in being very prime example of multi -businesses' A -Frame signs lined up one after another intrusive and creating visual clutter and distraction. The Town, businesses, and the Chamber have not offered less intrusive sign alternatives to A -Frames. sage. standards don't exist because there is little to no enforcement or penalty for improper A-Framesign Policy 11.3.3 of the current General Plan, Focus 2020 "The Town shall use existing standards and guidelines, and establish new ones as needed, to ensure that the build environment blends with or enhances the natural environment by: (4 actions, 1 of which is) "Restricting cing signage to identification" The YVOF General Plan makes a clear distinction between identification versus advertising goods and services. (Development Action # 125) currently used and proposed usage is no longer limited to identification and direction. and A -Frame signage as c Y ointment times, price lists, Signs are used for and will be allowed to be used for advertising, selecting app employment hiring notices. 2of2 The addition of A -Frame sign permanent usage is not an independent sign usage. It is an addition to the 20 plus changes to the Town sign code since 2011. The changes include more signs per locations, larger signs, brighter signs, more colors, no uniformity and others. All these additions and changes have resulted in intrusive signage and does not support the required purposes of identification and direction. Your Voice, Our Future — Proposed General Plan — Development Action #125 "Maintain the unique character of Oro Valley by studying and updating:" • Signage regulations to emphasize identification and direction over advertising goods and services to maintain compatibility and minimal intrusiveness. The citizens have clearly reinforced the current general plan polices regarding signage. The current and proposed usage for A -Frame signs is in conflict with both the current General Plans and Your Voice, Our Future as they go beyond identification and are not compatibility with maintaining the unique character that Oro Valley citizens would like to see preserved. Other comments regarding intrusiveness and usage have been discussed previously. Submitted by: Donald Bristow Oro Valley resident 1of2 Town Council Meeting September 7, 2016 Regular Agenda Item 3b Responses to Staff's Cited General Plan Policy Analysis for Outdoor Displays The proposed Code Amendment doesn't conform with the General Plan, Focus 2020, goals and policies cited by staff. General Plan Chapter 3, Retail Development/Leakage "A high percentage of Oro Valley residents spend a significant amount of money outside of the Town reducing the financial benefits to the Town. Creation of preferred high-end shopping opportunities through development and annexation could reduce retail leakage." This statement recognizes that there is retail leakage, and the solution offered is the creation of preferred high-end shopping opportunities through development and annexation. Outdoor displays are not remotely associated with the recommended corrective action. Outdoor displays of the type currently in use in Oro Valley, like A -Frame signs, will discourage the preferred high-end shopping opportunities from locating in Oro Valley. No retail area will support annexation into Oro Valley so they can have an outdoor display. Only about 1% of existing Oro Valley businesses have enough interest in outdoor displays to use them on an ongoing basis. This level of interest indicates a lack of support for the need for outdoor displays. Policy 3.1 Current General Plan, Focus 2020 "Ensure long term financial and economic sustainability for the Town" Since the 2011, the temporary use of outdoor displays has been available in Oro Valley. Since 2011, only 26 permits were issued to 24 businesses and 1 to the Oro Valley Public Library. Of the 24 business issued permits, seven (7) have closed, leaving only 18 active permits. Of the 18 permits, only 8 businesses are full-time users of outdoor displays. These numbers and any incremental sales taxes generated by outdoor display will not ensure the long term financial and economic sustainability of the Town. The very low participation rate also supports a lack of financial and economic sustainability. Policy 3.1.1 Current General Plan, Focus 2020 "The Town shall ensure that future growth reflects the desires of the community in balance with an analysis of the Town's financial needs, maintain and periodically update the Town's Community Economic Development Strategy to ensure that future development will complement community values and implement the community's economic vision for the future, while maintaining the ability of Oro Valley to attract and retain desirable businesses." My responses, above, to Chapter 3, retail leakage, and policy 3.1 apply to Policy 3.1.1. 1 am not aware of any Oro Valley community values that support the use of outdoor displays. Oro Valley businesses have shown little interest in outdoor displays; therefore, the majority haven't identified this an economic driver for their future. If the businesses don't recognize the economic importance of outdoor displays than the Town has no reason to consider it. In the final analysis there is no logical connection between this Policy and outdoor displays. 2 of 2 Policy 3.1.5 Current General Plan, Focus 2020 "The Town shall continue its efforts to attract new high-end retail and service businesses, especially those in under -represented categories, in order to help reduce expenditure leakage." This policy is a repeat of the above "General Plan Chapter 3, Retail Development/Leakage." The responses to General Plan Chapter 3, Policies 3.1, and 3.1.1 all adequately address this Policy. The General Plan policies offered by staff in support of this proposed amendment, outdoor displays, have little, if any, association with outdoor displays. If fact they support reasons to reject the use of outdoor displays. The proposed amendment is not consistent with the General Plan policies and should be rejected. Submitted by: Donald Bristow Oro Valley Resident Stine, Michelle From: Standish, Michael Sent: Friday, September 02, 2016 9:50 AM To: Diane Bristow Cc: Stine, Michelle Subject: RE: P & Z Commission Meeting Good Morning Diane, I will forward this information to the Planning and Zoning Department for proper distribution. Thank you. Mike Standish, CMC Town Clerk Town Clerk's Office Town of Oro Valley 520-229-4741 mstand ish c -i orovaIleyaz.gov From: Diane Bristow [mailto Sent: Friday, September 02, 2016 9:15 AM To: Standish, Michael <mstandish@orovalleyaz.gov> Cc: Stine, Michelle <mstine@orovalleyaz.gov> Subject: P & Z Commission Meeting Good morning Mike, On September 6, 2016, the Planning & Zoning Commission will be holding its second Public Hearing about Your Voice, Our Future. Don and I met with Bayer and Elias pertaining some comments each of made at the August 231 during the first Public Hearing. Regarding Item #3: PUBLIC HEARING: YOUR VOICE, OUR FUTURE GENERAL PLAN FINAL ADOPTION AND READINESS OF THE PLAN FOR THE PUBLIC VOTE, could you please put a copy of my email to Elisa and Bayer into the commissioners' packet for the September 6, 2016 meeting ? Thank you for your assistance with this, and enjoy your long weekend. Diane