Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPackets - Council Packets (747)       *AMENDED (4/3/18, 11:30 AM) AGENDA ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION April 4, 2018 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CAÑADA DRIVE         REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 5:00 PM   CALL TO ORDER   ROLL CALL   *EXECUTIVE SESSION - Pursuant to ARS 38-431.03(A)(4) for determining instruction to give their attorney for contract negotiations and possible ARS 38-431.03(A)(5) regarding salary negotiations   REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM   CALL TO ORDER   ROLL CALL   PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE   UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS   COUNCIL REPORTS   DEPARTMENT REPORTS   The Mayor and Council may consider and/or take action on the items listed below: ORDER OF BUSINESS: MAYOR WILL REVIEW THE ORDER OF THE MEETING   INFORMATIONAL ITEMS   1. Letters of Appreciation - Police Department   CALL TO AUDIENCE – At this time, any member of the public is allowed to address the Mayor and Town Council on any issue not listed on today’s agenda. Pursuant to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, individual Council Members may ask Town Staff to review the matter, ask that the matter be placed on a future agenda, or respond to criticism made by speakers. However, the Mayor and Council may not discuss or take legal action on matters raised during “Call to Audience.” In order to speak during “Call to Audience” please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card.   PRESENTATIONS   1. Presentation of a plaque of appreciation to Randy Herberholz for his contribution to Oro Valley's lead role in developing Southern Arizona's distracted driving initiatives   CONSENT AGENDA (Consideration and/or possible action)   A. Minutes - March 21, 2018   B. Request for approval of a Final Plat Amendment to revise the no-build area on Lot 402 in Stone Canyon Neighborhood IIA, located at 1269 N. Tortolita Mountain Circle   C. Resolution No. (R)18-13, approving the dedication of Big Wash Trailhead, including vehicular and trail access, and Trail No. 180, located north of Tangerine Road and within the Rancho Vistoso Boulevard loop   D. Resolution No. (R)18-14, amending the infrastructure improvement plans supporting development impact fees for Transportation, Parks and Water Utility   E. Resolution No. (R)18-15, authorizing and approving a second supplemental Intergovernmental Agreement between the Town of Oro Valley and the Town of Marana to accommodate the construction of a portion of Shannon Road as part of the design and construction of roadway improvements to Tangerine Road from Dove Mountain Boulevard/Twin Peaks to La Cañada Drive   REGULAR AGENDA   1. PUBLIC HEARING: LOCAL ALTERNATIVE EXPENDITURE LIMITATION ELECTION (HOME RULE OPTION)   2. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING A CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN, LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RECREATION AREA PLAN FOR SAGUAROS VIEJOS PHASE 1, A 44-LOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION, LOCATED WEST OF LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD AND NORTH OF NARANJA ROAD   3. PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING ORDINANCE NO. (O)18-06, REQUEST TO REZONE AN 85.2-ACRE PROPERTY LOCATED NEAR THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF NARANJA DRIVE AND LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD FROM R1-20 and R1-144 TO R1-7   FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS (The Council may bring forth general topics for future meeting agendas. Council may not discuss, deliberate or take any action on the topics presented pursuant to ARS 38-431.02H)   CALL TO AUDIENCE – At this time, any member of the public is allowed to address the Mayor and Town Council on any issue not listed on today’s agenda. Pursuant to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, individual Council Members may ask Town Staff to review the matter, ask that the matter be placed on a future agenda, or respond to criticism made by speakers. However, the Mayor and Council may not discuss or take legal action on matters raised during “Call to Audience.” In order to speak during “Call to Audience” please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card.   ADJOURNMENT     POSTED: 3/28/18 by pp at 5:00 p.m. AMENDED AGENDA POSTED: 4/3/18 by pp at 3:00 p.m. When possible, a packet of agenda materials as listed above is available for public inspection at least 24 hours prior to the Council meeting in the office of the Town Clerk between the hours of 8:00 a.m. – 5:00p.m. The Town of Oro Valley complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If any person with a disability needs any type of accommodation, please notify the Town Clerk’s Office at least five days prior to the Council meeting at 229-4700. INSTRUCTIONS TO SPEAKERS Members of the public have the right to speak during any posted public hearing. However, those items not listed as a public hearing are for consideration and action by the Town Council during the course of their business meeting. Members of the public may be allowed to speak on these topics at the discretion of the Chair. If you wish to address the Town Council on any item(s) on this agenda, please complete a speaker card located on the Agenda table at the back of the room and give it to the Town Clerk. Please indicate on the speaker card which item number and topic you wish to speak on, or if you wish to speak during “Call to Audience”, please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. Please step forward to the podium when the Mayor announces the item(s) on the agenda which you are interested in addressing. 1. For the record, please state your name and whether or not you are a Town resident. 2. Speak only on the issue currently being discussed by Council. Please organize your speech, you will only be allowed to address the Council once regarding the topic being discussed. 3. Please limit your comments to 3 minutes. 4. During “Call to Audience” you may address the Council on any issue you wish. 5. Any member of the public speaking must speak in a courteous and respectful manner to those present. Thank you for your cooperation.    Town Council Regular Session Item # 1. Meeting Date:04/04/2018   Submitted By:Catherine Hendrix, Police Department Information Subject Letters of Appreciation - Police Department Attachments PD Appreciation Letters     Town Council Regular Session Item # 1. Meeting Date:04/04/2018   Presentation of a plaque of appreciation to Randy Herberholz for his contribution to Oro Valley's lead role in developing Southern Arizona's distracte Information Subject Presentation of a plaque of appreciation to Randy Herberholz for his contribution to Oro Valley's lead role in developing Southern Arizona's distracted driving initiatives Summary Attachments No file(s) attached.    Town Council Regular Session Item # A. Meeting Date:04/04/2018   Requested by: Mike Standish Submitted By:Michelle Stine, Town Clerk's Office Department:Town Clerk's Office Information SUBJECT: Minutes - March 21, 2018 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval.  EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: N/A BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: N/A SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to approve, (approve with the following changes) the March 7, 2018 minutes.  Attachments 3-21-18 Draft Minutes  3/21/18 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 1 MINUTES ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION March 21, 2018 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hiremath called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT:Satish Hiremath, Mayor Lou Waters, Vice Mayor Joe Hornat, Councilmember Rhonda Piña, Councilmember Bill Rodman, Councilmember Mary Snider, Councilmember Steve Solomon, Councilmember (attended via phone) PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Hiremath led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS Communications Administrator Misti Nowak announced the upcoming Town meetings and events. COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Hornat reported that he attended a ride-a-long with the Golder Ranch Fire Department. Councilmember Hornat reported on The Wall That Heals event held at Oro Valley's Riverfront Park March 15-18, 2018. Mayor Hiremath spoke about his experience at The Wall That Heals event and thanked all the participants that made the event happen. 3/21/18 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 2 Councilmember Snider introduced Alivia Islas, a senior at Canyon Del Oro High School, for her outstanding talents and leadership. DEPARTMENT REPORTS No reports were received. ORDER OF BUSINESS Mayor Hiremath reviewed the order of business and stated that the order would stand as posted. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS There were no informational items. CALL TO AUDIENCE No comments were received. PRESENTATIONS 1.Recognition of Outgoing Board and Commission Members Mayor Hiremath recognized outgoing Board and Commission Members. CONSENT AGENDA A.Minutes - March 7, 2018 B.Fiscal Year 2017/18 Financial Update through January 2018 C.Resolution No. (R)18-11, authorizing and approving an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) between the Town of Oro Valley and the Pima County Recorder to provide election services for the August 28, 2018 Primary Election and the November 6, 2018 General Election D.Request for approval of a Final Plat for Phase 1 of the Nakoma Sky senior care facility, located on the southeast corner of First Avenue and Naranja Drive MOTION:A motion was made by Vice Mayor Waters and seconded by Councilmember Snider to approve Consent Agenda items (A - D). MOTION carried, 7-0. REGULAR AGENDA 3/21/18 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 3 1.PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUS SION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER (TEP) TO REPLACE EXISTING UTILITY POLES ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF TANGERINE ROAD, BETWEEN SHANNON ROAD AND COPPER MOUNTAIN DRIVE Planning Manager Bayer Vella presented item #1 and included the following; - Purpose - Location Map - Proposal - Review Tools: General Plan & Zoning Criteria - Summary and Recommendation Tucson Electric Power's Senior Director of Government Relations Larry Lucero continued the presentation and included the following; - Purpose and need - What will be built - How it will be built - Design considerations - New poles will be taller and stronger - 9 foot average height difference - Questions Discussion ensued amongst Council, staff and Mr. Lucero regarding item #1. Mayor Hiremath opened the public hearing. No comments were received. Mayor Hiremath closed the public hearing. Discussion continued amongst Council, staff and Mr. Lucero regarding item #1. MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Rodman and seconded by Vice Mayor Waters to approve the Conditional Use Permit to replace the existing utility poles, equipment and wires on the south side of Tangerine Road between Copper Mountain Drive and Shannon Road, based on the finding that the proposal is consistent with the Conditional Use Permit Review Criteria. MOTION carried, 7-0. 3/21/18 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 4 2.AMENDING SECTION 24.9 OF THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REGARDING THE ECONOMIC EXPANSION ZONE (EEZ) a. RESOLUTION NO. (R)18-12, DECLARING THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS OF SECTION 24.9 OF THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REGARDING THE ECONOMIC EXPANSION ZONE, PROVIDED IN EXHIBIT "A" WITHIN THE ATTACHED RESOLUTION AND FILED WITH THE TOWN CLERK, A PUBLIC RECORD MOTION:A motion was made by Vice Mayor Waters and seconded by Councilmember Hornat to approve Resolution No. (R)18-12, declaring the proposed amendments of Section 24.9 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code regarding the Economic Expansion Zone, provided in Exhibit "A" within the attached resolution and filed with the Town Clerk, a public record. MOTION carried, 7-0. 2.b. PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE NO. (O)18-05, AMENDING SECTION 24.9 OF THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REGRDING THE ECONOMIC EXPANSION ZONE (EEZ) Planning Division Manager Bayer Vella presented item #2b and included the following; - Proposed Amendment - Why is EEZ expansion important? - Proposed Amendment - Recommendation Discussion ensued amongst Council and staff regarding item #2b. Mayor Hiremath opened the public hearing. The following individual spoke in opposition to item #2b: Oro Valley resident Timothy Bohen The following individual spoke in support to item #2b: Oro Valley resident and President and CEO of the Greater Oro Valley Chamber of Commerce Dave Perry Mayor Hiremath closed the public hearing. Discussion continued amongst Council and staff regarding item #2b. 3/21/18 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 5 MOTION:A motion was made by Vice Mayor Waters and seconded by Councilmember Piña to approve Ordinance No. (O)18-05, amending Section 24.9 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code regarding the Economic Expansion Zone (EEZ). Discussion continued amongst Council and staff regarding the Economic Expansion Zone. MOTION carried, 7-0. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS No future agenda items were requested. CALL TO AUDIENCE No comments were received. ADJOURNMENT MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Snider and seconded by Councilmember Rodman to adjourn the meeting at 7:01 p.m. MOTION carried, 7-0. Prepared by: __________________________ Michelle Stine, CMC Deputy Town Clerk I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the regular session of the Town of Oro Valley Council of Oro Valley, Arizona held on the 21st day of March, 2018. I further certify that the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present. Dated this _____ day of ____________________, 2018. ___________________________ Michael Standish, CMC Town Clerk    Town Council Regular Session Item # B. Meeting Date:04/04/2018   Requested by: Bayer Vella  Submitted By:Milini Simms, Community Development & Public Works Department:Community Development & Public Works Information SUBJECT: Request for approval of a Final Plat Amendment to revise the no-build area on Lot 402 in Stone Canyon Neighborhood IIA, located at 1269 N. Tortolita Mountain Circle RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The purpose of this request is to consider a Final Plat Amendment to revise the no-build area on Lot 402 in Stone Canyon Neighborhood IIA, located at 1269 N. Tortolita Mountain Circle (Attachment 1). Per the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development, encroachment into no-build areas may be approved, without a land area trade, when the encroachment does not contain any protected environmental resources. Historically, no-build areas were platted in Stone Canyon to protect environmental resources, such as rock outcrops and steep slopes. However, many of these areas were delineated using aerials with the understanding refinement in the field may occur on occasion. The proposed Final Plat Amendment (Attachment 2) is to revise the no-build area to gain approximately 1,674 square feet of buildable space. Staff met with the applicant onsite and confirmed the proposed areas of encroachment do not contain any protected environmental resources (see Attachment 3). As such, staff recommends approvals finding the request is in compliance with the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development.  BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: Final Plat Amendments not considered minor as defined by the Zoning Code, require Town Council approval prior to being officially recorded with Pima County. In 2006, the Final Plat for Stone Canyon Neighborhood IIA was approved and features several lots with no-build areas, which were established to protect environmental resources such as steep slopes and rock outcrops common in the area. Many of these areas were delineated using aerials with the understanding refinement in the field may occur on occasion. Per the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development, encroachment into no-build areas may be approved, without a land area trade, when the encroachment does not contain any of the aforementioned protected environmental resources. Staff met with the applicant onsite and confirmed the proposed areas of encroachment do not contain any protected environmental resources (see Attachment 3). As such, staff recommends approvals, finding the request is in compliance with the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development.  FISCAL IMPACT: N/A SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to approve the Final Plat Amendment to revise the no-build area on Lot 402 in Stone Canyon Neighborhood IIA, finding it is in conformance with the Zoning Code. OR I MOVE to deny the Final Plat Amendment to revise the no-build area on Lot 402 in Stone Canyon Neighborhood IIA, finding that _____________________. Attachments ATTACHMENT 1- LOCATION MAP  ATTACHMENT 2-EXISTING AND PROPOSED NO BUILD AREA  ATTACHMENT 3- IMAGES OF PROPOSED AREAS  Lot 402, Stone Canyon Neighborhood IIA Location Map (OV1800494) Attachment 1 Images of Proposed Areas Lot 402, Stone Canyon Neighborhood IIA Attachment 3 A B Area A: 1103.6 sq. ft. Area B: 570.8 sq. ft. Revised Areas Environmental Resources Existing No-Build Boundary A A Excludes Major Rock Outcrop B B    Town Council Regular Session Item # C. Meeting Date:04/04/2018   Requested by: Bayer Vella  Submitted By:Milini Simms, Community Development & Public Works Department:Community Development & Public Works Information SUBJECT: Resolution No. (R)18-13, approving the dedication of Big Wash Trailhead, including vehicular and trail access, and Trail No. 180, located north of Tangerine Road and within the Rancho Vistoso Boulevard loop RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The purpose of this request is to consider the proposed dedication (Attachment 1) of Big Wash Trailhead, including vehicular and trail access, and Trail No. 180 located north of Tangerine Road and within the Rancho Vistoso Boulevard loop (Attachment 2). The existing recreational staging area (Big Wash Trailhead) is located on private property and currently has a temporary easement for public use. The section of Trail No. 180 being dedicated is only the portion located south of  Rancho Vistoso Boulevard, not the private section located north of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard. This section has an existing WAPA easement, which must continue to be maintained. Dedication of both items will provide permanent connections to the larger trail network. As such, they were included as conditions of approval when the property was rezoned in December 2017. The conditions required dedication be completed within 120 days of the rezoning approval (approved on 12/6/2017).  There are some final steps to be completed prior to the Town's acceptance of a clean title report and conveyance of the trailhead. As such and included in Attachment 1, is the authorization for the Town Manager or designees to take these necessary administrative steps to accept the dedication and execute the terms of the associated deed and easement. BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: Prior Approvals  1987- Property included in the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development and annexed into Oro Valley. 2009- Major General Plan Amendment approved for this specific area. 2017- Type 1 (major) General Plan Amendment and Rezoning approved for this Big Wash area, reconfiguring the uses. Both Big Wash Trailhead and Trail No.180 are located north of Tangerine Road, within the Rancho Vistoso Boulevard Loop. Specifically, Trail No.180 is located along the WAPA power line (Attachment 2) and will be available for use as a permanent, non-motorized public access to the larger trail network. The section being dedicated is only the portion located south of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard, not the private section located north of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard. This section has an existing WAPA easement, which must continue to be maintained. The trailhead is located on the east side of the Rancho Vistoso Blvd. loop and directly south of the proposed eastern access (Attachment 3). This recreational staging area is intended to provide bicyclists, equestrians and pedestrians with safe access to the existing trails located north of the trailhead. The following improvements were also included with the conditions of approval for the rezoning and are to be completed by the future developer through the use of recreation impact fees:  Improved drainage and parking infrastructure Amenities such as a drinking fountain, bicycle parking, restroom, seating area and an informational kiosk Informational signage Connections to the Big Wash Trail Both the trailhead and trail are part of a larger, regional trail network as evidenced by several other trails traversing the property (Attachment 2). Legal access for public use of those trails will be granted through easements during the platting process. DISCUSSION The property owner, VP II Loan LLC, is dedicating the Big Wash Trailhead and Trail No. 180 to the Town. As a recreational staging area and prominent trail connecting to the larger trail network, the Town's Parks and Recreation Department is best suited to continue ongoing maintenance and upkeep of the area. The dedication requires:  Use of the property to support and enhance the larger, regional trail network Partnership between the Town and future developer for improvements to the trailhead Continued maintenance of the trailhead and trail No transferring of the property without prior approval of the donor Per the rezoning conditions of approval, dedication is to be completed within 120 days of the rezoning approval (approved on 12/6/2017). However, there are some final steps to be completed prior to the Town's acceptance of a clean title and conveyance of the trailhead. As such and included in Attachment 1, is the authorization for the Town Manager and other administrative offices, or their designees to take these necessary steps to accept the dedication and execute the terms of the associated deed and easement. FISCAL IMPACT: Improvements to Big Wash Trailhead (Attachment 3) will be funded using recreation impact fees from the future developer of the property and must be completed in accordance with the timeline established in the rezoning conditions of approval (for informational purposes only, see Attachment 4). SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to APPROVE Resolution No. (R)18-13, accepting the dedication of the Big Wash Trailhead, including vehicular and trail access, and Trail No. 180 to the Town. OR I MOVE to DENY Resolution No. (R)18-13, approving the dedication of the Big Wash Trailhead, including vehicular and trail access, and Trail No. 180 based on the finding ______________________. Attachments ATTACHMENT 1 - RESOLUTION NO. (R)18-13  ATTACHMENT 2- LOCATION MAP  ATTACHMENT 3- BIG WASH TRAILHEAD IMPROVEMENTS  ATTACHMENT 4- APPROVED REZONING CONDITONS  RESOLUTION NO. (R)18-13 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING AND ACCEPTING THE DEDICATION OF BIG WASH TRAILHEAD, INCLUDING VEHICULAR AND TRAIL ACCESS, AND TRAIL NO. 180 FROM VP II LOAN, LLC. WHEREAS, VP II Loan, LLC, desires to dedicate the Big Wash Trailhead and Trail 180; and WHEREAS,the Town desires to accept the dedication of the Big Wash Trailhead and Trail 180 in order provide permanent connections to the larger trail network; and WHEREAS, the Big Wash Trailhead is an existing recreation staging area which is located on private property and currently has a temporary easement for public use; and WHEREAS, the section of Trail No. 180 to be dedicated, is the portion located south of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and is not the private section to the north of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the Town of Oro Valley to accept the Special Warranty Deed attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated by reference, granting the Big Wash Trailhead to the Town, and enter into the Trail Easement, attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and incorporated by reference, to continue ongoing maintenance of the trailhead and trail. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, that: 1. The Town Manager and other administrative officials, or their designees, are hereby authorized to take such steps as necessary to accept the dedication and execute and implement the terms of the Special Warranty Deed and the Trail Easement. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, this 4 t h dayof April, 2018. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA Dr. Satish I. Hiremath, Mayor ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM: Michael Standish, Town Clerk Tobin Sidles, Legal Services Director Date Date 2 EXHIBIT “A” When Recorded, Please Return to: Town of Oro Valley ____________________ ____________________ Exempt from Affidavit of Value per A.R.S. § 11-1134(A)(3). Special Warranty Deed For valuable consideration, VP II Loan LLC and ML Manager LLC as agent for those individual owners listed on Exhibit A attached ( together, "Grantor"), do hereby convey to the Town of Oro Valley, a municipal corporation,the “Grantee” herein, the following real property (the “Property”) situated in Pima County, Arizona: As described in Exhibit B attached hereto. SUBJECT TO all general and special real property taxes and other assessments, reservations in patents, water rights, claims or title to water and all easements, rights of way, covenants, conditions, restrictions, reservations, declarations, encumbrances, liens, obligations, liabilities and other matters as may appear of record, any and all conditions, easements, encroachments, rights of way or restrictions which a physical inspection or accurate ALTA survey of the Property would reveal. Grantor hereby binds itself and its successors to warrant and defend the title as against all acts of Grantor herein and no other, subject to the matters set forth above. REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE LEFT PURPOSELY BLANK 3 Dated this ______day of __________________, 2018. GRANTOR VP II Loan LLC, an Arizona limited liability company By ML MANAGER LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, its Manager By: Mark Winkleman, Chief Operating Officer STATE OF ARIZONA ) ) ss. County of Maricopa ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of __________________, 2018, by Mark Winkleman, known by me to be the Chief Operating Officer of ML Manager LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, the Manager of VP IILoan LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, on behalf of the company. Notary Public My Commission Expires: 4 ML MANAGER LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, as Agent for the Owners listed on Exhibit A attached By: Mark Winkleman, Chief Operating Officer STATE OF ARIZONA ) ) ss. County of Maricopa ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of __________________, 2018, by Mark Winkleman, known by me to be the Chief Operating Officer of ML Manager LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, as Agent for the Owners listed on Exhibit A attached. Notary Public My Commission Expires: 5 OWNERS Trine Holdings, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company, as to an undivided 2.894% ownership VP II Loan LLC, an Arizona Limited Liability Company, as to an undivided 71.221% ownership Bruce Dennis Buckley and Alivia Virginia Buckley, Trustees of The Bruce Dennis Buckley and Alivia Virginia Buckley Revocable Living Trust dated June 4, 1985 and Amended December 7, 1994, as to an undivided 0.813% ownership Walter J. Clarke, Sr., a married man, as his sole and separate property, as to an undivided 0.151% ownership First Trust Company of Onaga, Custodian FBO Walter J. Clarke, Sr. Roth IRA Account #R215XXXX, as to an undivided 0.255% ownership David Furst and Hannah Furst, Trustees of The Furst Family Trust dated July 1, 1988, and any amendments thereto, as to an undivided 0.427% ownership Harvey Golden and Merylee Golden, husband and wife as joint tenants with right of survivorship, as to an undivided 0.184% ownership Queen Creek XVIII, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company, as to an undivided 4.065% ownership First Trust Company of Onaga, Custodian FBO Stephen L. Hooker IRA #41021XXXXX, as to an undivided 0.602% ownership Lonnie Joel Krueger, Trustee of The Lonnie Joel Krueger Family Trust Agreement dated January 24, 1991, as to an undivided 0.504% ownership Maurice J. Lazarus, Trustee of The Maurice J. Lazarus Charitable Remainder Annuity Trust under Agreement dated March 15, 1999, as to an undivided 0.705% ownership WCL858006, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, as to an undivided 4.065% ownership 6 Investor CLOUT, an Arizona Partnership, as to an undivided 4.065% ownership William J. Miller and Sandra B. Miller, Trustees of the Miller Family Trust dated February 7, 2000, and any amendments thereto, as to an undivided 2.033% ownership First Trust Company of Onaga, Custodian FBO Katalin Rader Roth IRA Account #R215XXXX, as to an undivided 0.813% ownership Linda A. Reeves, Trustee of The Linda Ann Reeves Trust dated March 2, 2005, and any amendments thereto, as to an undivided 2.106% ownership Robert G. Roden, Trustee of The Robert G. Roden Living Trust dated October 1, 2004, and any amendments thereto, as to an undivided 1.626% ownership First Trust Company of Onaga, Custodian FBO Susan E. Shipley IRA #41021XXXXX, as to an undivided 0.813% ownership David Brian Stanton, Trustee of the David Brian Stanton Revocable Trust dated August 25, 2004, and any amendments thereto, as to an undivided 0.594% ownership John C. Vinson and Taeko Vinson, Trustees of the John Charles Vinson Family Trust dated December 3, 1984, and any amendments thereto, as to an undivided 2.064% ownership 7 April 19, 2017 WLB No. 185050-ML01-1003 WALEGALS\185050\Nh05\Big Wash trailhead legal.doc LEGAL DESCRIPTION BIG WASH TRAILHEAD That portion of the Northeast corner of Section 30 and the Southeast quarter of Section 19, Township 11 South, Range 14 East, Gila and Salt River Meridian, Pima County, Arizona, described as follows: BEGINNING at the Northeast quarter corner of said Section 30 from which the North quarter corner of said Section 30 bears N 89°45'00" W, a distance of 2635.59 feet; THENCE S 00°15'01" E, along the East line of the Northeast quarter of said Section 30, a distance of 1047.63 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve concave to the Southwest on the Southwesterly right-of-way of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard; THENCE, along said right-of-way, along said curve to the right having a radius of 5410.75 feet, a central angle of 00°06'02", the chord of which bears S 27°13'33" E for a distance of 9.50 feet, for an arc length of 9.50 feet to a point to a point of tangency; THENCE S 27°10'33" E, a distance of 143.84 feet; THENCE S 52°04'51" W, leaving said right-of-way line, a distance of 445.56 feet; THENCE N 31°09'15" W, a distance of 675.31 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve concave to the Southeast on the South line of THE ESTATES AT HIGH MESA, a subdivision of Pima County as recorded in Book 49, Maps & Plats, Page 91, Pima County records; THENCE, along said South line, along said curve to the right with a radius of 1049.28 feet, a central angle of 24°10'17", the chord of which bears N 44°56'09" E for a distance of 439.38 feet, Thence along the arc of said curve for a distance of 442.52 feet to the Southeast corner of said subdivision; THENCE N 35°00'33" W, along the east line of said subdivision, a distance of 927.76 feet to the South line of that certain ingress — egress and utility easement as described in docket 10474, page 1606, Pima County records; THENCE N 50°31'23" E, along said South line, a distance of 23.78 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the South: THENCE, along said South line, along said curve to the right with a radius of 25.00 feet, a central angle of 94°28'05", the chord of which bears S 82°14'35" E for a distance of 36.71 feet, Thence along the arc of said curve for a distance of 41.22 to point on the Southwesterly right-of-way of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard; 8 THENCE S 35°00'33" E, along said right-of-way line, a distance of 552.61 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve concave to the Southwest THENCE, along said right-of-way, along said curve to the right having a radius of 5410.75 feet, a central angle of 07°43'57", the chord of which bears S 31°08'34" E for a distance of 729.67 feet, for an arc length of 730.23 feet to a point to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING: 283,102 square feet or 6.4991 acres of land, more or less. Prepared By: THE WLB GROUP, INC. Peter D. Cote, RLS 44121 EXPIRES 3-31-2018 9 10 APPROVED AS TO CONTENT ________________________________________DATE: ____________________ ________________________________________ _______________________________________ APPROVED AS TO FORM ________________________________________DATE: _____________________ _____________________________ Town Attorney STATE OF ARIZONA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF Pima County ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me the ______ day of _________________, 2018 by ______________________. ___________________________________ Notary Public My Commission Expires: _____________________ STATE OF ARIZONA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF Pima County ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me the ______ day of _________________, 2018 by _______________. ___________________________________ Notary Public My Commission Expires: _____________________ 13702296.2/028149.0053 11 EXHIBIT “B” When recorded return to: _____________________ _____________________ _____________________ TRAIL EASEMENT VP II Loan LLC and ML Manager LLC as agent for those individual owners listed on Exhibit "A" attached ( together, "Grantor"), does hereby grant to Town of Oro Valley, an Arizona municipal corporation ("Grantee"), a perpetual easement and right-of way for non-motorized public access, ingress, egress and use as a trail (the “Easement”) on, over, under, and through the burdened land as legally described in Exhibit "B", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the “Easement Property”). Grantee is hereby granted the right to lay, construct, operate, maintain, inspect, repair, replace, relocate and remove trail facilities and appurtenances on, over, under, and through the Easement Property. Grantee may enter the Easement Property at all reasonable times necessary or convenient to accomplish the foregoing. Following entry for the above purposes, Grantee shall restore the Easement Property to a good and clean condition. This Easement is subject to the following conditions: 1. Grantor may use the Easement Property for any purposes not inconsistent with actual use of said Easement Property for the purposes herein granted, so long as Grantee's use and access to the Easement Property is not obstructed. 2. Grantor owns the Easement Property and has the authority to grant the Easement. 3. All easements and rights described herein are easements and rights running with the Easement Property, perpetually in force and effect, and at all times shall inure to the benefit of, and are binding on, Grantee and Grantor, their successors and assigns, respectively. 4. Grantee shall use the Easement Property in accordance with all applicable laws, statutes, codes, rules and regulations (the “Laws”). Grantee, at Grantee’s sole cost and expense, shall be solely responsible for maintaining and repairing the 12 Easement Property in a good, safe, clean and commercially reasonable condition and in accordance with all applicable Laws. Grantee shall keep the Easement Property free of any liens and encumbrances on account of the use of the Easement Property by Grantee. 5. Grantee covenants and agrees to indemnify, defend (with counsel reasonably approved by Grantor) and hold harmless Grantor and its successors and assigns (the “Indemnified Parties”) for, from and against any and all actual or alleged claims, demands, causes of actions, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses (including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys’ fees, expert witness’ fees, court costs and other litigation-related expenses) (collectively, “Claims”) that may be claimed or asserted against any of the Indemnified Parties, the Easement Property, or any adjacent property owned by the Indemnified Parties, for bodily injury, death or property damage, arising out of, relating to, or in connection with (i) the exercise by Grantee of any of its rights granted under this Easement, or (ii) the breach by Grantee of any of its covenants or obligations under this Easement. The indemnification and defense obligations hereunder shall survive any termination of this Easement. 6. Reference in subsequent deeds of conveyance, or in any mortgage or deed of trust or other evidence of obligation, to the easements and rights described in this Easement within any subsequent conveyance of the burdened land or assignment of easement and or easement rights shall be sufficient to create and reserve such easements and rights to the respective grantees, mortgagees, and trustees of such unit of ownership as fully and completely as though such easements and rights were recited fully and set forth in their entirety in such documents. (Signatures of the parties appear on the following pages.) 13 THIS EASEMENT granted this ______day of __________________, 2018. GRANTOR VP II Loan LLC, an Arizona limited liability company By ML MANAGER LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, its Manager By: Mark Winkleman, Chief Operating Officer STATE OF ARIZONA ) ) ss. County of Maricopa ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of __________________, 2018, by Mark Winkleman, known by me to be the Chief Operating Officer of ML Manager LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, the Manager of VP II Loan LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, on behalf of the company. Notary Public My Commission Expires: 14 ML MANAGER LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, as Agent for the Owners listed on Exhibit A attached By: Mark Winkleman, Chief Operating Officer STATE OF ARIZONA ) ) ss. County of Maricopa ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of __________________, 2018, by Mark Winkleman, known by me to be the Chief Operating Officer of ML Manager LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, as Agent for the Owners listed on Exhibit A attached. Notary Public My Commission Expires: 15 GRANTEE: Town of Oro Valley __________________________________ Dr. Satish I. Hiremath, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ___________________________________________________________ Michael Standish, Town Clerk Tobin Sidles, Legal Services Director STATE OF ARIZONA ) ) SS COUNTY OF PIMA ) This instrument was acknowledged before me this ___day of _______________, 2018, by _______________________, the ________________________ of the Town of Oro Valley, an Arizona municipal corporation, on behalf thereof. ________________________ Notary Public My Commission Expires: ______________________________ 16 OWNERS Trine Holdings, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company, as to an undivided 2.894% ownership VP II Loan LLC, an Arizona Limited Liability Company, as to an undivided 71.221% ownership Bruce Dennis Buckley and Alivia Virginia Buckley, Trustees of The Bruce Dennis Buckley and Alivia Virginia Buckley Revocable Living Trust dated June 4, 1985 and Amended December 7, 1994, as to an undivided 0.813% ownership Walter J. Clarke, Sr., a married man, as his sole and separate property, as to an undivided 0.151% ownership First Trust Company of Onaga, Custodian FBO Walter J. Clarke, Sr. Roth IRA Account #R215XXXX, as to an undivided 0.255% ownership David Furst and Hannah Furst, Trustees of The Furst Family Trust dated July 1, 1988, and any amendments thereto, as to an undivided 0.427% ownership Harvey Golden and Merylee Golden, husband and wife as joint tenants with right of survivorship, as to an undivided 0.184% ownership Queen Creek XVIII, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company, as to an undivided 4.065% ownership First Trust Company of Onaga, Custodian FBO Stephen L. Hooker IRA #41021XXXXX, as to an undivided 0.602% ownership Lonnie Joel Krueger, Trustee of The Lonnie Joel Krueger Family Trust Agreement dated January 24, 1991, as to an undivided 0.504% ownership Maurice J. Lazarus, Trustee of The Maurice J. Lazarus Charitable Remainder Annuity Trust under Agreement dated March 15, 1999, as to an undivided 0.705% ownership WCL858006, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, as to an undivided 4.065% ownership 17 Investor CLOUT, an Arizona Partnership, as to an undivided 4.065% ownership William J. Miller and Sandra B. Miller, Trustees of the Miller Family Trust dated February 7, 2000, and any amendments thereto, as to an undivided 2.033% ownership First Trust Company of Onaga, Custodian FBO Katalin Rader Roth IRA Account #R215XXXX, as to an undivided 0.813% ownership Linda A. Reeves, Trustee of The Linda Ann Reeves Trust dated March 2, 2005, and any amendments thereto, as to an undivided 2.106% ownership Robert G. Roden, Trustee of The Robert G. Roden Living Trust dated October 1, 2004, and any amendments thereto, as to an undivided 1.626% ownership First Trust Company of Onaga, Custodian FBO Susan E. Shipley IRA #41021XXXXX, as to an undivided 0.813% ownership David Brian Stanton, Trustee of the David Brian Stanton Revocable Trust dated August 25, 2004, and any amendments thereto, as to an undivided 0.594% ownership John C. Vinson and Taeko Vinson, Trustees of the John Charles Vinson Family Trust dated December 3, 1984, and any amendments thereto, as to an undivided 2.064% ownership 18 LEGAL DESCRIPTION RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 5 TRAIL EASEMENT A 100 foot strip of land across a portion of Sections 19 and 30, Township 11 South, Range 14 East, Gila and Salt River Meridian, Pima County, Arizona, described as follows: COMMENCING at the West quarter corner of said Section 30 from which the Northwest corner of said Section 30 bears N 00°04'48" E, a distance of 2642.36 feet; THENCE N 00°04'48" E, along the West line of the Northwest quarter of said Section 30, a distance of 521.09 feet to a point on the Easterly line of an existing electric easement as recorded in Book 75, misc., Page 364, Pima County records and the POINT OF BEGINNING 1; THENCE N 15°47'58" E, along said Easterly line, a distance of 2941.36 feet to the Southerly line of RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 5, PARCEL C, a subdivision of Pima County, Arizona as recorded in Book, 47, Maps & Plats, Page 66, Pima County records; THENCE N 81°13'08" W, along said Southerly line, a distance of 100.76 feet to the Westerly line of said electric easement; THENCE S 15°47'58" W, along said Westerly line, a distance of 2573.75 feet to a point on the West line of the Northwest quarter of said Section 30; THENCE S 00°04'48" W, along said West line of the Northwest quarter of said Section 30, a distance of 369.10 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING 1; CONTAINING: 275,757 square feet or 6.3305 acres of land, more or less. TOGETHER WITH: A 100 foot strip of land across a portion of Section 25, Township 11 South, Range 13 East, Gila and Salt River Meridian, Pima County, Arizona, described as follows: COMMENCING at the Southeast corner of said Section 25 from which the East quarter corner of said Section 25 bears N 00°08'50" W, a distance of 2628.48 feet; THENCE S 89°50'40" W, along the South line of the Southeast quarter of said Section 25, a distance of 897.93 feet to a point on the Easterly line of that aforementioned electric easement recorded in Book 75, misc., Page 364, Pima County records; THENCE N 15°47'58" E, along said Easterly line, a distance of 31.20 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING 2; 19 THENCE continue N 15°47'58" E, along said Easterly line, a distance of 2365.64 feet to a point on the Southerly line of ALTERRA AT VISTOSO TRAILS, a subdivision of Pima County, Arizona as recorded in Seq. No. 20173070030, Pima County records; THENCE N 45°00'00" W, along said Southerly line, a distance of 114.56 feet to the Westerly line of said electric easement; THENCE S 15°47'58" W, along said Westerly line, a distance of 2450.12 feet to a point on a line 30.00 feet North of and parallel with the South Line of the Southeast quarter of said Section 25; THENCE N 89°50'40" E, along said parallel line, a distance of 104.01 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING 2. CONTAINING: 240,798 square feet or 5.5280 acres of land, more or less. 20 Big Wash Trailhead and Trail No. 180 Location Map Attachment 2 Big Wash Trailhead Trail No. 180 List of Improvements 1.Improved, dust free surface for public parking and access 2.Drainage infrastructure 3.64 parking spaces 4.Equestrian trailer parking 5.Equestrian mounting block 6.Bike rack 7.Restroom facilities with low level lighting 8.Drinking fountain 9.Signage for park and trailhead rules 10.Directional signs on Rancho Vistoso Boulevard 11.Directional signs on the access road to the Big Wash Trailhead 12.Directional signs on the Big Wash Trailhead 13.Informational kiosk 14.Trash and recycle receptacles 15.Shaded seating area 16.Bicycle connection between the access road and trail access. 17.Connection to the Big Wash Trail 18.Animal waste collection station ATTACHMENT 3 Big Wash Trailhead Improvements Attachment 1 Rezoning Conditions Big Wash Development Open Space and Trails 1. The open space area within the conservation easement as recorded at Seq. #20021670107 and depicted in Exhibit “A” shall be deeded in fee simple to Pima County within 120 days of rezoning approval. 2. The land for the future trailhead and vehicular and trail access depicted in Exhibit “B” shall be deeded in fee simple to the Town of Oro Valley within 120 days of rezoning approval. To ensure joint access in the future, the Planning and Zoning Administrator and Town Engineer shall review a modified route between Rancho Vistoso Bouelvard and the Big Wash Trailhead as part of the Final Plats for Parcels 5H and/or 5I. 3. All open space areas and trails located outside of the Pima County conservation easement and proposed subdivision development boundaries as depicted in Exhibit “A” shall be dedicated to the public (Pima County or Oro Valley), for the purpose of ownership, maintenance and/or control, and recorded concurrently with the corresponding Final Plats for Parcels 5H, 5I, 5X, and/or 5W. 4. Trail No. 180 (located along the WAPA powerline as depicted on Exhibit “A”) shall be dedicated to the Town of Oro Valley and recorded within 120-days of rezoning approval for use as a permanent, non- motorized public access. This action is subject to maintenance of the existing WAPA easement and resolution of any other significant WAPA considerations. 5. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R’s) for each of the proposed subdivisions shall include notification to future residents of all publicly accessible open space, trails, trailheads and other public recreational uses. 6. In addition to required neighborhood park(s), the developer(s) shall improve and/or initially fund, at the discretion of the Parks & Recreation Director, the existing public use trailhead depicted in Exhibit “B.” The requirements below are to be applied independently to development on the western portion (accessed by Moore Road/Arrowsmith Road) and northern portion (accessed by Rancho Vistoso Blvd only) indicated in the Tentative Development Plan. All trailhead improvements described herein shall be funded by recreation impact fees as described below: a. The trailhead improvements or initial funding provided by developer(s) shall not exceed the value of the required public recreation impact fee contribution for their subdivision project. The developer(s) shall receive corresponding recreation impact fee credits for said trailhead improvements or initial funding. The impact fee credits shall also be applicable to design, permitting, or other costs associated with said trailhead improvements. b. The trailhead improvements or initial funding shall be completed and in place by the time thirty-five percent (35%) of the building permits are issued. c. The trailhead improvements indicated in Exhibit “B” shall be installed in a manner and order at the sole discretion of the Parks & Recreation Director, acknowledging reasonable construction sequencing by developer(s). d. If the Town applies additional recreation impact fee funds from other nearby development toward additional trailhead improvements, the next subdivision to develop shall install the additional trailhead improvements in addition to their required share, at the discretion of the Parks & Recreation Director. e. The Town Parks & Recreation Director retains the right to pursue construction of any of the trailhead improvements by means other than those described above, in which case only the balance of any such required trailhead improvements described in this Condition shall apply to the developer(s). 7. The future developer(s) of Parcels 5W and/or 5X shall complete Phase 2 of the Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 5 Community Park as shown in the approved Master Recreation Plan (see Attachment 8 of the Rezoning Staff Report). The recreational area shall be completed and in place by the time thirty-five percent (35%) of the building permits are issued for the future homes on these parcels. Infrastructure 8. A 16-inch water main shall be installed within the access road right-of-way to Parcels 5H and 5I. This water main shall terminate outside of the property boundary for Parcel 5I at its southwest corner. 9. The proposed two-lane roadway cross section providing access to parcels 5-H and 5-I shall consist of a 66-foot right-of-way/common area width with a 14-foot travel lane in each direction, 5-foot bike lanes, a 5-foot sidewalk along the north side and a 10-foot shared use path along the south side. The shared use path shall extend and connect to the trail-head facility. 10. Moore Road shall be extended from the Rancho Vistoso Parcel 5-GKV termination point to a point of connection with Arrowsmith Drive so as to create a looped road. Construction of the Moore Road loop extension shall be required with construction of Parcel 5-W and/or 5-X, whichever occurs first. The loop road improvements shall consist of the following: a. The existing segment of Arrowsmith Drive, on the east side of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard shall be improved to include a westbound through/right-turn lane, a westbound left-turn lane, an eastbound through lane, 5-foot bike lanes, a 5-foot sidewalk on the north side and a 10-foot shared use path on the south side. b. The new segment of the Moore Road extension from the Arrowsmith Drive point of connection to the Moore Road point of connection to the north shall include a minimum 62-foot right-of-way width. The roadway section shall consist of 14’ travel lanes in each direction, 6-foot bike lanes, a 5-foot sidewalk on the north/west side a 10-foot shared use path on the south/east side and turn lanes where required. The roadway is to match the width and cross section of the 62-foot Moore Road right-of-way section constructed with Rancho Vistoso Parcel 5-GKV to the north. c. To reduce traffic congestion associated with the future school site, the Arrowsmith/Moore Road extension shall be designed to accommodate future widening. In addition to the roadway section requirements identified in 10.b. above, the design shall include additional right-of-way width to accommodate future left-turn and right-turn lanes along the school property frontage with associated widening transitions. Additionally, the developer shall construct a 14-foot, at-grade landscaped median with the initial construction of the Arrowsmith/Moore Road extension along the school frontage. The ultimate right-of-way width and improvement details shall be determined during the final site planning and improvement plan stages of development for this project as approved by the Town Engineer. 11. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) shall be provided at the time of each development of Parcel 5W and Parcel 5X. In addition to standard requirements, the TIA is to include a traffic signal and turn lane warrant analysis for the intersection of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and Arrowsmith Drive. If development of Parcel 5-W or Parcel 5-X results in a traffic signal and/or a right turn lane being warranted, the developer shall improve the intersection at no cost to the public. 12. Private sewer improvements shall be required with construction of Parcels 5-H and 5-I. Required sewer improvements are to be in accordance with the sewer letter issued by the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department, see Attachment 10 of the Rezoning staff report (Attachment 7). Improvement shall consist of the following: a. Construction of a private collection system and private lift station to serve to the proposed development. b. Construction of a private force main to discharge into an existing gravity sewer manhole within Rancho Vistoso Boulevard. 13. Public sewer improvements shall be required with construction of Parcel 5-W and/or 5-X, whichever occurs first. Required sewer improvements are to be in accordance with the sewer letter issued by the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department, see Attachment 10 of the Rezoning staff report (Attachment 7). Improvements shall consist of the following: a. Construction of a public lift station to be located on either parcel 5-R or 5-W. The location of the lift station shall be coordinated with RWRD. b. Construction of a public force main to discharge into an existing gravity sewer manhole within Arrowsmith Drive. c. The public sewer improvements are to be designed to include capacity and connectivity for development of Parcel 5-R (Amphitheater School District) and developed Parcel 5- GKV (Alterra at Vistoso Trails). d. The gravity sewer line, lift station and force main are to be designed and constructed to RWRD standards. Design 14. Rooftop colors shall be limited to desert earth tones and colors which blend with the natural environment to limit the visual impact to existing property owners. 15. Apartments are not permitted.    Town Council Regular Session Item # D. Meeting Date:04/04/2018   Requested by: Paul Keesler  Submitted By:Paul Keesler, Community Development & Public Works Department:Community Development & Public Works Information SUBJECT: Resolution No. (R)18-14, amending the infrastructure improvement plans supporting development impact fees for Transportation, Parks and Water Utility RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The purpose of this resolution is to amend the Infrastructure Improvement Plan (IIP) supporting development impact fees for the categories of Transportation, Parks and the Water Utility. The reason for the amendment (attachment 1) is that conditions within the community have changed since original adoption of the IIP and the project list needs to be revised. These changes do not impact the current level of service, nor does it affect the current fee structure. BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: Impact fees are a way for local governments to require new developments to pay a proportionate share of the infrastructure costs their projects impose on community service levels. As such, new development pays for its pro-rata share of the cost of new capital facilities to maintain said service levels. These fees are one-time, up-front charges that are assessed on new development.  State law governing impact fees stipulates that impact fees may only be collected to pay for improvements identified in an adopted Infrastructure Improvement Plan (IIP). So by implication, impact fees can only be spent on improvements listed in the IIP. State law also provides that change may be required and/or allowed during the life of an adopted IIP. This allows the capital plan to change in response to unforeseen development at the time of first adoption, without triggering the need for a complete and comprehensive impact fee update. The history of the Town's current Impact Fee Schedule and adopted IIP is as follows:  12/04/13 - PUBLIC HEARING: ADOPTING THE 2013-2023 LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS AND INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR THE TOWN'S DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE UPDATE STUDIES COVERING PARKS, POLICE, TRANSPORTATION, ALTERNATIVE WATER SYSTEM AND POTABLE WATER SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES   01/15/14 - RESOLUTION NO. (R)14-07, ADOPTING THE 2013-2023 LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS AND INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT PLANS DATED OCTOBER 4, 2013, FOR THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 02/19/14 - PUBLIC HEARING: REPEALING AND REPLACING ORO VALLEY TOWN CODE CHAPTER 13 - DEVELOPMENT FEES AND CHAPTER 15, ARTICLE 17 - WATER RATES, FEES AND CHARGES SETTING FORTH STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES FOR CREATING AND ASSESSING DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES CONSISTENT WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES (A.R.S.) SECTION 9-463.05 04/04/14 - PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE NO. (O)14-04, AMENDING THE ORO VALLEY TOWN CODE CHAPTER 13, DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES, BY REPEALING CHAPTER 13 IN ITS ENTIRETY AND REPLACING IT WITH A NEW CHAPTER 13 AS PROVIDED IN EXHIBIT "A" and PUBLIC HEARING:  ORDINANCE NO. (O)14-05, AMENDING THE ORO VALLEY TOWN CODE CHAPTER 15 ARTICLE 17, WATER RATES, FEES AND CHARGES TO COMPLY WITH NEW CHANGES MADE TO CHAPTER 13, DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES    This amendment has been noticed to the public for more than 30 days prior to this meeting. FISCAL IMPACT:  Since the fee structure remains unchanged, there is no fiscal impact to the budget. SUGGESTED MOTION:  I MOVE to (approve or deny) Resolution No. (R)18-14, amending the infrastructure improvement plans supporting development impact fees for transportation, parks and water utilities. Attachments Resolution No. (R)18-14 Amending Infrastructure Improvement Plans  Attachment 1 - IIP Amendment  RESOLUTION NO. (R)18-14 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT PLANS SUPPORTING DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FOR TRANSPORTATION, PARKS AND THE WATER UTILITY IN PURSUANT TO ARS § 9- 463.5 (D)(3) AND FOLLOWING THE PROCESS OUTLINED IN ARS § 9-463.5 (D) (10) WHEREAS, Arizona municipalities are authorized to adopt and amend Infrastructure Improvements Plans (“IIP”) that support development impact fees pursuant to ARS § 9-463.5; and WHEREAS, ARS § 9-463.5 (D) (3) dictates that municipalities shall update the land use assumptions and (“IIP”) at least every five years; and WHEREAS, the Town of Oro Valley desires to amend its IIP pursuant to ARS § 9-463.5 (D) (3) and following the process outlined in ARS § 9-463.5 (D) (10); and WHEREAS, Pursuant to ARS § 9-463.5 (D) (10), “[n]otwithstanding the notice and hearing requirements for adoption of an infrastructure improvements plan, a municipality may amend an infrastructure improvements plan adopted pursuant to [ARS § 9-463.05] without a public hearing if the amendment addresses only elements of necessary public services in the existing infrastructure improvements plan and the changes to the plan will not, individually or cumulatively with other amendments adopted [ ], increase the level of service in the service area or cause a development fee increase of greater than five per cent when a new or modified development fee is assessed;” and WHEREAS, the proposed amendments to the Oro Valley IIP addresses only elements of necessary public services in the existing infrastructure improvements plan and the changes to the plan do not, individually or cumulatively with other amendments adopted, increase the level of service in the service area or cause a development fee increase; and WHEREAS,Pursuant to ARS § 9-463.5 (D) (10), a “municipality shall provide notice of any such amendment at least thirty days before adoption, shall post the amendment on its website; and WHEREAS, on March 1, 2018, the Town of Oro Valley posted notice of its proposed amendment to the IIP on the Town of Oro Valley website; and WHEREAS, the Town of Oro Valley published notice of its proposed amendment to the IIP in the Daily Territorial newspaper pursuant to ARS § 9-463.5 (D) (10). NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, adopting amendments to the IIP, attached as Exhibit “A,” supporting impact fees for Transportation, Parks and the Water Utility pursuant to ARS § 9-463.5 (D) (3) and following the process outlined in ARS § 9- 463.5 (D) (10). PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 4 th day ofApril, 2018. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Dr. Satish I. Hiremath, Mayor ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM : Michael Standish, Town Clerk Tobin Sidles, Legal Services Director Date: Date: EXHIBIT “A” TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF AMENDMENTS TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR TRANSPORTATION, PARKS AND WATER UTILITY Notice is hereby given that the Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, AZ will convene on April 4, 2018 at 6:00 PM in its regular Town Council meeting to consider an amendment to its development impact fee infrastructure improvements plan (IIP) as noted below: Transportation 1Tangerine Rd, Shannon Rd‐La Canada Dr 1,000,000.00$       2La Cholla Blvd, Tangerine  Rd‐Lambert Ln 800,000.00$           3Shannon Rd, Tangerine  Rd‐Naranja Dr 4,200,000.00$       4Lambert Ln, 0.5 mi. E of Shannon‐Rancho Sonora 17,280,000.00$     5Moore Rd, Yellow Orchard‐Mystic View 1,440,000.00$       6Rancho Vistoso & Woodburne Intersection 750,000.00$           7Oracle Rd & Rams Field Intersection 750,000.00$           8Moore Rd La Cholla Blvd Intersection 900,000.00$           9 Transportation Fee Update Study Costs (2) 69,600.00$             Total  for all  Projects 27,189,600.00$     1Tangerine Rd, Shannon Rd‐La Canada Dr 1,000,000.00$       2La Cholla Blvd, Tangerine  Rd‐Lambert Ln 800,000.00$           3Shannon Rd, Tangerine  Rd‐Naranja Dr 4,200,000.00$       4Lambert Ln, 0.5 mi. E of Shannon‐Rancho Sonora 14,000,000.00$     5Moore Rd, Yellow Orchard‐Mystic View 1,440,000.00$       6Rancho Vistoso & Woodburne Intersection 750,000.00$           7Oracle Rd & Rams Field Intersection 750,000.00$           8Moore Rd La Cholla Blvd Intersection 900,000.00$           9 Transportation Fee Update Study Costs (2) 69,600.00$             10 Moore  Rd ‐ extension E of Rancho Vistoso Blvd 1,000,000.00$       11 Moore  Rd & Rancho Vistoso Blvd Intersection 750,000.00$           12 Moore  Rd & La Canada Dr Intersection 900,000.00$           13 Linda Vista Widening E of Oracle Rd 400,000.00$           14 Glover Rd Multi ‐Use  Path 150,000.00$           15 Glover Rd south half widening 500,000.00$           16 Naranja Two‐Way  Left Turn Lane 458,000.00$           Total  for all  projects 28,067,600.00$     2014 Development Impact Fee ‐ Infrastructure Improvement Plan (IIP) 2018 Amended Development Impact Fee ‐ Infrastructure  Improvement Plan (IIP) Project  No.Project Name Capital Cost Project  No.Project Name Capital Cost Parks 1 Naranja Park Development ‐ 30 acres 4,000,000.00$       2James D. Kriegh Park Expansion 1,000,000.00$       3Impact Fee Update  Studies (2) 34,800.00$             Total  for all  Projects 5,034,800.00$       1 Naranja Park Development ‐ 30 acres 3,300,000.00$       2James D. Kriegh Park Expansion 1,000,000.00$       3Impact Fee Update  Studies (2) 34,800.00$             4Big Wash Trailhead 500,000.00$           5 Linda Vista Trailhead 100,000.00$           Total  for all  projects 4,934,800.00$       2014 Development Impact Fee ‐ Infrastructure Improvement Plan (IIP) Project  No.Project Name Capital Cost 2018 Amended Development Impact Fee ‐ Infrastructure  Improvement Plan (IIP) Project  No.Project Name Capital Cost Water Utility Phase I Projects (1,000 AF/Year) 1CAP La Cholla "D‐E" Blending Booster Station 300,000.00$           2 Wheeling of 1,000 Acre‐feet CAP Water to Oro Valley 930,000.00$           324‐inch pipeline ‐ Naranja to La Cholla to Tangerine 2,800,000.00$       4Oro Valley Water Utility Naranja CAP Booster Station Upgrade 1,200,000.00$       5"E to C" PRV Naranja Reservoir 100,000.00$           6Oro Valley Water Utility CAP 12‐inch pipeline 880,000.00$           7Oro Valley Water Utility CAP 16‐inch pipeline 1,100,000.00$       Phase  2 Projects (500 AF/Year) 8 Wheeling of 500 Acre‐feet of CAP Water to Oro Valley 3,300,000.00$       9Steam Pump "C‐D Booster Station 1,200,000.00$       10 Big Wash "D‐E" Booster Station 800,000.00$           11 Inlet/Outlet Modifications  at Allied Signal Reservoir 50,000.00$             Interest and Financing Costs 4,051,200.00$       Total  for all  Projects 1‐11 16,711,200.00$     Project  No.Project Name Capital Cost 2014 Development Impact Fee ‐ Infrastructure Improvement Plan (IIP) This meeting will be held in the Oro Valley Town Council Chambers, 11000 N. La Canada Dr., Oro Valley, AZ 85737. This notice is also available for review on the Town’s website at: www.orovalleyaz.gov Michael Standish District Clerk Dated: March 1, 2018 Water Utility (cont) Northwest Recovery & Delivery System (Partnered Projects) 240,000.00$           66,000.00$             288,000.00$           444,000.00$           12,000.00$             2Well improvement analysis & recovery permits 60,000.00$             3Well drilling & testing 351,000.00$           4Construction permitting, drilling, development & testing 1,170,000.00$       5Well equipping design & site improvements 585,000.00$           6 Pipeline design (recovered water & transmission) 660,692.40$           7 Pipeline construction 2,642,769.00$       8NWRRDS forebay design 99,231.00$             9NWRRDS forebay reservoir construction 396,231.00$            Sub‐Total  for NWRRDS project numbers 1‐9 7,014,923.40$       Northwest Recovery & Delivery System (Independent Projects) 10 Pipeline route  study and preliminary design (9.68 Miles) 120,000.00$           11 Shannon  road forebay reservoir & booster station property acquisition (3 acres) 120,000.00$           12 Pipeline easement acquisition (9.68 Miles) 450,000.00$           13 Pipeline design  (9.68 Miles of 16 ‐ inch DIP) 840,000.00$           14 NWRRDS  forebay reservoir booster station design (2500 gpm = 4,000 AF/YR) 60,000.00$             15 Shannon  road forebay reservoir & booster station design (2500 gpm = 4,000 AF/YR) 180,000.00$           17 Booster Station Construction at NWRRDS forebay reservoir 300,000.00$           18 Shannon  road forebay reservoir construction 840,000.00$           19 Booster Station Construction at Shannon road forebay reservoir 300,000.00$           20 Pipeline construction from Booster Station at NWRRDS to La Canada Reservoir 5,880,000.00$       Sub‐Total  for NWRRDS project numbers 10‐20 9,090,000.00$       Internal System Improvement to Convey NWRRDS water in OVWU system 21 Moore  Rd transmission main upsizing 55,000.00$             22 NWRRDS  interconnect to Tangerine 270,000.00$           23 NWRRDS  interconnect to Lambert 510,000.00$           Sub‐Total  for NWRRDS project numbers 21‐23 835,000.00$           Total  for all  projects 1‐23 16,939,923.40$     2018 Amended Development Impact Fee ‐ Infrastructure  Improvement Plan (IIP) Project  No.Project Name Capital Cost 1Program Management Support Services FY 2019 ‐ 2023    Town Council Regular Session Item # E. Meeting Date:04/04/2018   Requested by: Jose Rodriguez  Submitted By:Jose Rodriguez, Community Development & Public Works Department:Community Development & Public Works Information SUBJECT: Resolution No. (R)18-15, authorizing and approving a second supplemental Intergovernmental Agreement between the Town of Oro Valley and the Town of Marana to accommodate the construction of a portion of Shannon Road as part of the design and construction of roadway improvements to Tangerine Road from Dove Mountain Boulevard/Twin Peaks to La Cañada Drive RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On July 3, 2013, the Town of Oro Valley adopted Resolution No. (R)13-46, approving and authorizing an IGA between Oro Valley, Town of Marana and Pima County for the design and construction of improvements to Tangerine Road from Twin Peaks Road to La Cañada Drive. Then on July 1, 2015, the Town of Oro Valley adopted Resolution No. (R)15-51, approving and authorizing a supplemental IGA between Oro Valley and the Town of Marana to incorporate the design and construction of a reclaimed water main and potable water mains for the Oro Valley’s Water Utility Department. The proposed second supplemental IGA is to pay for improvements to a section of Shannon Road. BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: The Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) was authorized to design and construct improvements to Tangerine Road from Twin Peaks/Dove Mountain to La Cañada Dr. The Town of Marana has been identified by the RTA as the lead agency for the project. The Town of Marana, Town of Oro Valley and Pima County entered into an IGA to coordinate and facilitate the design and construction of the project. On July 3, 2013, the Mayor and Council approved this IGA by Resolution No. (R)13-46. On April 16, 2014, an amendment was approved via Resolution No. (R)14-20 to clarify the means for selecting a contractor. A supplemental IGA was then approved by Oro Valley and Marana for the design and construction of Oro Valley’s reclaimed and potable water mains. The Mayor and Council approved the supplemental IGA by Resolution No. (R)15–51.  (R)15–51.  The proposed second supplemental IGA is necessary to pay for improvements to a portion of Shannon Road. Improvements to Shannon Road (plans attached) are required as part of St. Mark’s Catholic Church offsite improvements and is stipulated in the Town of Oro Valley Ordinance No. (O)11-12, which requires improvements for Shannon Road adjacent to the St. Mark’s property. This section of Shannon Road intersects Tangerine Road which is currently under construction with the contractor, Tangerine Corridor Constructors (TCC). The Town of Oro Valley, St. Mark and TCC have coordinated to complete the required Shannon Road Improvements concurrently with the Tangerine Road project.   Town staff has received both approved Roadway Improvement Plans and funds from St. Mark's to complete the required improvements on Shannon Road. St. Mark's has secured funding in their budget via the September 20, 2017 Board of Directors Meeting. TCC has reviewed the plans and provided a Guaranteed Maximum Pricing (GMP 21 attached) of $144,128 for construction of which $10,200 is for increasing the asphalt thickness at the request of Town staff. On November 13, 2017, St. Mark provided funds via check #16132 in the amount of $133,928 (attached) for their portion of Shannon Road, and the Town will pay $10,200 from regional funds.   The Town of Oro Valley and the Town of Marana have agreed to have TCC perform the improvements on Shannon Road per the contract, but requires a second supplemental IGA to memorialize the change order at the agreed GMP. The work is located fully within the Town’s right-of-way, and Town staff will inspect the construction for compliance with the plan, specifications and applicable standards.    The Town of Marana is expected to approve this second supplemental IGA at their council meeting on April 3, 2018. FISCAL IMPACT: There will be no fiscal impact to the Town. St. Mark's has provided $133,928 funds to cover the construction costs, and $10,200 will come from regional funds. SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to (approve or deny) Resolution No. (R)18-15, authorizing and approving a second supplemental Intergovernmental Agreement between the Town of Oro Valley and the Town of Marana to accommodate the construction of a portion of Shannon Road as part of the design and construction of roadway improvements to Tangerine Road from Dove Mountain Boulevard/Twin Peaks to La Cañada Drive. Attachments Resolution No. (R)18-15 Shannon Road Improvements  Second Supplemental IGA  Shannon Road Plans  GMP 21  St. Mark's Funds  C:\Windows\TEMP\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 7\@BCL@40222BC7\@BCL@40222BC7.docx Town of Oro Valley Attorney’s Office/ca/020209 RESOLUTION NO. (R)18-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING A SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT (“IGA”) BETWEEN THE TOWN OF MARANA AND THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY TO ACCOMMODATE CONSTRUCTION OF A PORTION OF SHANNON ROAD AS PART OF THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS TO TANGERINE ROAD WHEREAS, pursuant to A.R.S. § 11-952, the Town of Oro Valley, the Town of Marana are authorized to enter into Intergovernmental Agreements for joint and cooperative action; and WHEREAS, pursuant to A.R.S. § 9-276, the Town is authorized to lay out, maintain, control and manage public roads within its jurisdictional boundaries; and WHEREAS,on July 3, 2013 the Town of Oro Valley adopted Resolution (R) 13-46, approving and authorizing an IGA between Oro Valley, the Town of Marana for design and construction improvements to Tangerine Road; and WHEREAS, on July 1, 2015, the Town of Oro Valley adopted Resolution (R) 15-51, approving and authorizing the first supplemental IGA between Oro Valley and the Town of Marana incorporating Oro Valley Water Utility improvements into the Tangerine project; and WHEREAS, in an effort to improve a section of Shannon Road that is required to be improved and has already been paid for paid for by St Mark’s in the amount of $133,928.00 as offsite improvements in Ordinance (O) 11-12, it has become necessary to now include a portion of Shannon Road into the Tangerine project IGA; and WHEREAS,Shannon Road is a Town owned roadway and may be improved in the future, Oro Valley is contributing $10,200 in Regional Transportation Authority funds to guarantee the thickness of the pavement can accommodate future roadway use; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the Town of Oro Valley to authorize and approve the second supplemental IGA between the Town of Oro Valley and the Town of Marana to accommodate construction of a portion of Shannon Road as part of the design and construction of Tangerine Road project IGA. C:\Windows\TEMP\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 7\@BCL@40222BC7\@BCL@40222BC7.docx Town of Oro Valley Attorney’s Office/ca/020209 THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona that: 1.The second supplemental IGA, attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference, by and among the Town of Oro Valley, the Town of Marana to accommodate construction of a portion of Shannon Road as part of the design and construction of Tangerine Road project is hereby approved. 2.The Mayor and any other administrative officials are hereby authorized to take such steps necessary to execute and implement the terms of the Intergovernmental Agreement. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 4 th day of April, 2018. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Dr. Satish I. Hiremath, Mayor ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM: Michael Standish, Town Clerk Tobin Sidles, Legal Services Director Date Date C:\Windows\TEMP\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 7\@BCL@40222BC7\@BCL@40222BC7.docx Town of Oro Valley Attorney’s Office/ca/020209 EXHIBIT “A” 00056375.DOCX /1 - 1 -3/7/2018 8:39 AM SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TOWN OF MARANA AND THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY TO ACCOMMODATE ORO VALLEY’S CONSTRUCTION OF A PORTION OF SHANNON ROAD AS PART OF THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS TO TANGERINE ROAD – DOVE MOUNTAIN BOULEVARD/TWIN PEAKS ROAD TO LA CAÑADA DRIVE This second supplemental intergovernmental agreement (this “2 nd Supp TOM/OV IGA”) is entered into by and between the TOWN OF MARANA (“Marana”), an Arizona municipal corporation, and the TOWN OF ORO VALLEY (“Oro Valley”), an Arizona municipal corporation. Marana and Oro Valley are sometimes collectively referred to as the “Parties,” either of which is sometimes individually referred to as a “Party.” R ECITALS A. Marana has entered into intergovernmental agreements with the Regional Transportation Authority of Pima County (the “RTA”), recorded with their authorizing resolutions in the Pima County Recorder’s office on June 6, 2013, at Sequence 20131570430 and on October 21, 2015, at Sequence 20152940571 (the “RTA Tangerine IGAs”) to facilitate the design, right-of-way acquisition, and construction of improvements to Tangerine Road – Twin Peaks Road to La Cañada Drive (the “Project”). B. Marana has been identified by the RTA as the Lead Agency for the Project and is responsible for all aspects of project implementation, including construction. C. The Parties and Pima County entered into an intergovernmental agreement for the design and construction of the Project, recorded in the Pima County Recorder’s office on August 15, 2013, at Sequence 20132270883 (the “Local Governments Tangerine IGA”), to coordinate and facilitate the design and construction of the Project. D. The Local Governments Tangerine IGA was modified by the execution of “Amendment Number 1” dated June 3, 2014 (Pima County Contract No. CT-TR-140000000000000000016 Amendment No. 01), which was not recorded, but simply modified paragraph 9 (Contractor Selection) to allow a contractor for the Project to be selected “using a process that is authorized by Arizona Revised Statutes Title 34”; a contractor (the “Project Contractor”) has been procured to construct the Project in accordance with the selection process set forth in the Local Governments Tangerine IGA as modified by Amendment Number 1; and the Project Contractor is currently constructing the Project. E. The Parties entered into a “Supplemental Intergovernmental Agreement between the Town of Marana and the Town of Oro Valley to Accommodate Oro Valley Water Utility Work as part 00056375.DOCX /1 - 2 -3/7/2018 8:39 AM of the Design and Construction of Roadway Improvements to Tangerine Road – Dove Mountain Boulevard/Twin Peaks Road To La Cañada Drive” signed by the Mayor of Oro Valley on July 2, 2015, and signed by the Mayor of Marana on August 4, 2015 (the “1st Supp TOM/OV IGA”). F. The Parties now desire to enter into this 2 nd Supp TOM/OV IGA to accommodate Oro Valley’s construction of improvements to Shannon Road immediately south of and connecting to the Tangerine Road improvements being constructed as part of the Project. G. This 2 nd Supp TOM/OV IGA allows Oro Valley to take advantage of the economies of scale and to avoid potential construction conflicts by adding Oro Valley modifications to the Project, to be constructed by the Project Contractor, administered by Marana, and paid for by Oro Valley. H. The Parties are authorized to contract for services and enter into agreements with one another for joint and cooperative action pursuant to A.R.S. § 11-952, et seq. AGREEMENT NOW,THEREFORE,based on the foregoing recitals, which are incorporated by reference here, and in consideration of the matters and things set forth in this 2nd Supp TOM/OV IGA, the Parties hereby agree as follows: 1. Purpose.This 2nd Supp TOM/OV IGA is intended as a supplement to the RTA Tangerine Design/ROW IGA, the RTA Tangerine Construction IGA, the Local Governments Tangerine IGA as modified by Amendment Number 1, and the 1 st Supp TOM/OV IGA (collectively the “Controlling Tangerine IGAs”) to address only those Oro Valley Shannon Road modifications added to the Project pursuant to this 2nd Supp TOM/OV IGA. 2. Expansion of the Project.The scope of the Project shall be expanded to include modifications to Shannon Road south of Tangerine Road described in detail in Exhibit A attached to and incorporated by this reference in this 2nd Supp TOM/OV IGA and referred to in this 2nd Supp TOM/OV IGA as the “Shannon Road Work.” 3. Oro Valley’s responsibilities.Oro Valley shall: 3.1. Provide and pay for the design of the Shannon Road Work, including related survey services including As Built plans upon completion of the work. 3.2. Coordinate with Psomas, the design engineering firm for the Project, for incorporation of the Shannon Road Work design/plans into the Tangerine Corridor project plans. 3.3. Provide and pay for all permitting necessary for the Project Contractor to construct the Shannon Road Work. 3.4. Timely review and, if acceptable to Oro Valley, authorize Marana to execute a Project Guaranteed Maximum Price with the Project Contractor for the installation and construction of the Shannon Road Work. 00056375.DOCX /1 - 3 -3/7/2018 8:39 AM 3.5. Inspect the Shannon Road Work for compliance with all applicable regulations, statutes, and standards. 3.6. Pay for the construction of the Shannon Road Work performed by the Project Contractor by paying within 30 days of receipt from Marana each invoice for construction costs associated with the Shannon Road Work. 4. Marana’s responsibilities.Marana shall: 4.1. Negotiate and, if authorized by Oro Valley pursuant to paragraph 3.4 above, execute a Project Guaranteed Maximum Price with the Project Contractor for the construction of the Shannon Road Work, requiring the Project Contractor’s separate tracking of all costs associated with the Shannon Road Work. 4.2. Coordinate construction inspection for the Project with Oro Valley to facilitate Oro Valley’s inspection of the Shannon Road Work in accordance with paragraph 3.5 above. 4.3. Invoice Oro Valley for costs of the Shannon Road Work as the Project Contractor submits payment applications that include the Shannon Road Work. 4.4. Provide As Built files in AutoCAD and PDF form to Oro Valley upon completion of the Shannon Road Work. 4.5. Use its best efforts to minimize change orders that increase the cost of the Shannon Road Work. 5. Effective date; term.This 2nd Supp TOM/OV IGA shall become effective when it has been signed by the last Party and shall continue in effect until the sixth anniversary of final payment to the Project Contractor. 6. Interpretation of this 2nd Supp TOM/OV IGA. 6.1. Entire agreement. This instrument constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties pertaining to the subject matter of this 2nd Supp TOM/OV IGA, and all prior or contemporaneous agreements and understandings, oral or written, are hereby superseded and merged in this 2nd Supp TOM/OV IGA. 6.2. Exhibits. Any exhibits to this 2nd Supp TOM/OV IGA are incorporated in this 2nd Supp TOM/OV IGA by this reference. 6.3. Amendment. This 2nd Supp TOM/OV IGA may be modified, amended, altered or changed only by written agreement signed by both Parties. 6.4. Construction and interpretation. All provisions of this 2nd Supp TOM/OV IGA shall be construed to be consistent with the intention of the Parties as expressed in the Recitals section of this 2nd Supp TOM/OV IGA. 6.5. Severability. A declaration by statute or judicial decision that any provision of this 2nd Supp TOM/OV IGA is invalid or void shall have no effect on other provisions that can be given effect without the invalid or void provision, and to this extent the provisions of this 2nd Supp TOM/OV IGA are severable. If any provision of this 2nd Supp TOM/OV IGA 00056375.DOCX /1 - 4 -3/7/2018 8:39 AM is declared invalid or void, the Parties agree to meet promptly in an attempt to reach an agreement on a substitute provision. 6.6. Conflict of interest. This 2nd Supp TOM/OV IGA is subject to the provisions of A.R.S. § 38-511, which provides for cancelation in certain instances involving conflicts of interest. 7. Legal Jurisdiction. Nothing in this 2nd Supp TOM/OV IGA shall be construed as either limiting or extending the legal jurisdiction of the Parties. 8. No Joint Venture . It is not intended by this 2nd Supp TOM/OV IGA to, and nothing contained in this 2nd Supp TOM/OV IGA shall be construed to, create any partnership, joint venture or employment relationship between the Parties or create any employer-employee relationship between one Party and another Party’s employees. No Party shall be liable for any debts, accounts, obligations or other liabilities whatsoever of another Party, including (without limitation) another Party’s obligation to withhold Social Security and income taxes for itself or any of its employees. 9. No Third Party Beneficiaries . Nothing in the provisions of this 2nd Supp TOM/OV IGA is intended to create duties or obligations to or rights in third parties not parties to this 2nd Supp TOM/OV IGA or to affect the legal liability of either Party by imposing any standard of care different from the standard of care imposed by law. 10. Compliance with Laws . The Parties shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, rules, regulations, standards and executive orders, without limitation to those designated within this 2nd Supp TOM/OV IGA. 10.1. Anti-Discrimination. The provisions of A.R.S. § 41-1463 and Executive Order Number 99-4 issued by the Governor of the State of Arizona are incorporated by this reference as a part of this 2nd Supp TOM/OV IGA. 10.2. Americans with Disabilities Act. This 2nd Supp TOM/OV IGA is subject to all applicable provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act (Public Law 101-336, 42 U.S.C. 12101- 12213) and all applicable federal regulations under the Act, including 28 CFR Parts 35 and 36. 10.3. Workers’ Compensation. An employee of either Party shall be deemed to be an “employee” of both public agencies, while performing pursuant to this 2nd Supp TOM/OV IGA, for purposes of A.R.S. § 23-1022 and the Arizona Workers’ Compensation laws. The primary employer shall be solely liable for any workers’ compensation benefits, which may accrue. Each Party shall post a notice pursuant to the provisions of A.R.S. § 23-1022(E) in substantially the following form: All employees are hereby further notified that they may be required to work under the jurisdiction or control or within the jurisdictional boundaries of another public agency pursuant to an intergovernmental agreement or contract, and under such circumstances they are deemed by the laws of Arizona to be employees of both public agencies for the purposes of workers’ compensation. 00056375.DOCX /1 - 5 -3/7/2018 8:39 AM 11. Waiver. Waiver by either Party of any breach of any term, covenant or condition of this 2nd Supp TOM/OV IGA shall not be deemed a waiver of any other term, covenant or condition, or any subsequent breach of the same or any other term, covenant, or condition of this 2nd Supp TOM/OV IGA. 12. Force Majeure . A party shall not be in default under this 2nd Supp TOM/OV IGA if it does not fulfill any of its obligations under this 2nd Supp TOM/OV IGA because it is prevented or delayed in doing so by reason of uncontrollable forces. The term “uncontrollable forces” shall mean, for the purpose of this 2nd Supp TOM/OV IGA, any cause beyond the control of the party affected, including but not limited to failure of facilities, breakage or accident to machinery or transmission facilities, weather conditions, flood, earthquake, lightning, fire, epidemic, war, riot, civil disturbance, sabotage, strike, lockout, labor dispute, boycott, material or energy shortage, casualty loss, acts of God, or action or non-action by governmental bodies in approving or failing to act upon applications for approvals or permits which are not due to the negligence or willful action of the parties, order of any government officer or court (excluding orders promulgated by the parties themselves), and declared local, state or national emergency, which, by exercise of due diligence and foresight, such party could not reasonably have been expected to avoid. Either party rendered unable to fulfill any obligations by reason of uncontrollable forces shall exercise due diligence to remove such inability with all reasonable dispatch. 13. Notification. All notices or demands upon any party to this 2nd Supp TOM/OV IGA shall be in writing, unless other forms are designated elsewhere, and shall be delivered in person or sent by mail addressed as follows: To Marana: TOWN OF MARANA Town Engineer 11555 W. Civic Center Dr. Marana, Arizona 85653 To Oro Valley: TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Town Engineer 11000 N. La Cañada Dr. Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 14. Remedies . Any Party may pursue any remedies provided by law for the breach of this 2nd Supp TOM/OV IGA. No right or remedy is intended to be exclusive of any other right or remedy and each shall be cumulative and in addition to any other right or remedy existing at law or in equity or by virtue of this 2nd Supp TOM/OV IGA. 15. Counterparts . This 2nd Supp TOM/OV IGA may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. The signature pages from one or more counterparts may be removed and attached to a single instrument. 00056375.DOCX /1 - 6 -3/7/2018 8:39 AM IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this 2nd Supp TOM/OV IGA as of the last signature date below. TOWN OF M ARANA Ed Honea, Mayor Date: __________________ TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Satish Hiremath, Mayor Date: __________________ ATTEST: Town Clerk ATTEST: Town Clerk INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT DETERMINATION The foregoing intergovernmental agreement between the TOWN OF MARANA and the TOWN OF ORO VALLEY has been reviewed pursuant to A.R.S. § 11-952 by the undersigned, who have determined that it is in proper form and is within the powers and authority granted under the laws of the State of Arizona to the Party to this intergovernmental agreement represented by the undersigned. TOWN OF M ARANA: Town Attorney Date: __________________ TOWN OF ORO VALLEY: Town Attorney Date: __________________ 41968JASON A.SIMMERSExpires 3/31/2020SHANNON ROAD EXTENSIONSOUTH OF TANGERINE ROADCONSTRUCT A NEW 2 LANE ROADWAYAPPROVAL: 41968JASON A.SIMMERSExpires 3/31/2020 41968JASON A.SIMMERSExpires 3/31/2020 41968JASON A.SIMMERSExpires 3/31/2020 41968JASON A.SIMMERSExpires 3/31/2020 41968JASON A.SIMMERSExpires 3/31/2020 41968JASON A.SIMMERSExpires 3/31/2020 41968JASON A.SIMMERSExpires 3/31/2020 41968JASON A.SIMMERSExpires 3/31/2020 ML2 Management, LLC | 4346 East La Puente Avenue Phoenix, Arizona 85044 | Phone (480) 332-8897 | mitch@ml2management.com Date:November 13, 2017 To:Ms. Cheryl Huelle Company: Address: Project:St. Mark Shannon Rd. Extension ML2 Job#:10-002-D RE:St. Mark Catholic Parish Documents & Payment Items Being Transmitted Include:QTY SHTS 1 1 1 2 1 2 Comments: Mitchell L Lorenz Cheryl Huelle Date Town of Oro Valley 11000 N. La Canada Blvd Oro Valley, AZ 85737 $133,928.00 St. Mark Board Directors Resolution, dated Oct. 4, 2017 Contractors Estimate, dated Nov. 7, 2017 Hello Cheryl, I delivered the check, BOD resolution approving the amount and included the contractors estimate breakdown today and Kimberly Kernohan accepted the envelop. Please acknowledge receipt of the above referenced douments by signing below and returning a copy of this transmittal along with the Memorandum of Understanding letter that I will also sign and return to your attention. Thank you, TRANSMITTAL    Town Council Regular Session Item # 1. Meeting Date:04/04/2018   Requested by: Stacey Lemos Submitted By:Stacey Lemos, Finance Department:Finance Information SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING:  LOCAL ALTERNATIVE EXPENDITURE LIMITATION ELECTION (HOME RULE OPTION) RECOMMENDATION: There is no formal action required at this public hearing. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Every four years, the Town is required to request voter approval for the extension of the Town's alternative expenditure limitation or "Home Rule Option." This measure was last approved by the voters in 2014, and will be placed on the upcoming August 28, 2018 Primary election ballot for re-approval. With the Home Rule Option, the Town of Oro Valley is authorized to set its annual budget limits locally, based on available revenues, rather than having to fall under an old formula-based, state-imposed expenditure limitation. Provisions of the Arizona State Constitution and Arizona Revised Statutes impose an annual expenditure limitation, or spending cap, on Arizona cities and towns, including the Town of Oro Valley. The state-imposed expenditure limitation is a formula that uses actual payments of local revenues for FY 1979-80 as the spending base limit and adjusts the limit annually based on population growth and inflation. Article IX of the Arizona Constitution allows a city or town to adopt a local alternative expenditure limitation, or Home Rule Option, with the approval of a majority of the qualified voters of the community. The Home Rule Option allows a community to determine locally what its annual spending limits will be, rather than following the formula-based limit imposed by the State of Arizona. BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: The Town of Oro Valley has successfully received voter approval of the local alternative The Town of Oro Valley has successfully received voter approval of the local alternative expenditure limitation election (Home Rule Option) since state-enactment of the annual expenditure limitation in June 1980. The option must be submitted to the voters every four years if the community wishes to continue with Home Rule. Voter approval was obtained in 1982, 1986, 1990, 1994, 2002, 2006, 2010 and 2014. Historically, the state-imposed expenditure limitation formula has yielded a spending limitation, or cap, that is significantly lower than the amount of revenues the Town receives on an annual basis. The Town of Oro Valley's revenues and other financing sources for fiscal years 2019-20 through 2022-23, along with the state-imposed expenditure limitation, have been estimated and are summarized below:    Fiscal Year Estimated Revenues Expenditure Limitation Difference 2019-2020 $132,670,853 $40,059,042 $92,611,811 2020-2021 $122,275,100 $41,466,756 $80,808,344 2021-2022 $120,881,163 $42,689,609 $78,191,554 2022-2023 $124,450,003 $44,670,451 $79,779,552 Without voter approval of the Home Rule Option on August 28, 2018, the Town would be limited to spending the state-imposed amounts, even though revenues and other financing sources are estimated to exceed the limits by the differences indicated in the last column of the table. The Town would have to drastically cut services if the Home Rule Option fails to receive voter approval. Meanwhile, the Town's existing revenues would continue to be collected from its various sources and would not be able to be spent on the delivery of services to the community. If the Home Rule Option is not approved at the August 2018 election, no new expenditure limitation election may be held for at least two years. Tonight is the first public hearing on the proposed Home Rule Option and no formal action is required by Council at this evening's meeting. The second public hearing is scheduled for April 18, 2018, and at that meeting, the Town Council will be asked to act on a resolution that would allow for the Home Rule Option to be referred to the voters of the Town of Oro Valley at the August 28, 2018 Primary election. An affirmative vote of two-thirds (2/3) of the Town Council (5 votes) must be received to place the question on the ballot. The documents attached to this communication are required to be completed, reviewed and approved by the Auditor General's office in preparation for the Home Rule Option election. A publicity pamphlet must also be prepared for the Home Rule Option election which will need to be reviewed and approved by the Auditor General's office as well. The contents of the pamphlet are specified in state law and include the Summary Analysis attached hereto. Starting in June, staff plans to conduct a public outreach campaign to educate the community regarding this ballot question as has been done for past Home Rule Option elections. This campaign is expected to include presentations at community elections. This campaign is expected to include presentations at community meetings, placing information on the Town's website and through established social media outlets, outreach to homeowner's associations, and distribution of print materials, among other efforts. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A SUGGESTED MOTION: N/A Attachments Summary Analysis Worksheet  Summary Analysis  Detailed Analysis  Prior Fiscal 1978 PopulationFiscal YearYear Population/ Population = Factor2019-2020 45,200 / 1,475 = 30.64412020-2021 45,900 / 1,475 = 31.11862021-2022 46,510 / 1,475 = 31.53222022-2023 47,100 / 1,475 = 31.9322Projected State Total Expenditures1979-80 Population Inflation Imposed Estimated Under State-ImposedFiscal Year Base Limit x Factor x Factor = Expenditure Limitation + Exclusions Limit2019-2020 272,317$ x 30.6441 x 3.0804 = 25,705,659$ + 14,353,383$ 40,059,042$ 2020-2021 272,317$ x 31.1186 x 3.1557 = 26,741,792$ + 14,724,964$ 41,466,756$ 2021-2022 272,317$ x 31.5322 x 3.2375 = 27,799,616$ + 14,889,993$ 42,689,609$ 2022-2023 272,317$ x31.9322x3.3207 = 28,875,748$ + 15,794,703$ 44,670,451$ STATE-IMPOSED EXPENDITURE LIMITATIONALTERNATIVE EXPENDITURE LIMITATION(Home Rule Option)SUMMARY ANALYSIS WORKSHEETPOPULATION FACTOR COMPUTATION ALTERNATIVE EXPENDITURE LIMITATION (Home Rule Option) SUMMARY ANALYSIS The voters of the Town of Oro Valley in 1982, 1986, 1990, 1994, 1998, 2002, 2006, 2010 and 2014 adopted an alternative expenditure limitation (Home Rule Option). The purpose of this election is for the continued use of the Home Rule Option. Pursuant to the Arizona State Constitution, the Town of Oro Valley seeks voter approval to adopt a Home Rule Option to apply to the town for the next four years beginning in 2019-2020. Under a Home Rule Option if approved by the voters, the town estimates it will be allowed to expend approximately $132,670,853 in 2019-2020, $122,275,100 in 2020-2021, $120,881,163 in 2021-2022 and $124,450,003 in 2022-2023. With approval of the Home Rule Option, the town will utilize the expenditure authority for all local budgetary purposes including Public Safety, Streets and Roads Maintenance, Development Services, Transit Services, Parks and Recreation, Tourism and Economic Development, Water Utility, Magistrate Court, Stormwater Utility, Administration, Capital Improvement Projects, Municipal Debt Service and Contingency Reserves. Under the state-imposed limitation, the town estimates it will be allowed to expend approximately $40,059,042 in 2019-2020, $41,466,756 in 2020-2021, $42,689,609 in 2021-2022 and $44,670,451 in 2022-2023 for the operation of your local government. These expenditures include expenditures of constitutionally excludable revenues. The amount of revenue estimated to be available to fund the operation of your town government is $132,670,853 in 2019-2020, $122,275,100 in 2020-2021, $120,881,163 in 2021-2022 and $124,450,003 in 2022-2023. These revenue estimates are the same under the Home Rule Option or the state-imposed expenditure limitation. The Town of Oro Valley has no local property tax. Any and all dollar figures presented in this summary are estimates only and are based upon information available at the time of preparation of this analysis. The budget and actual expenditures in any of the four years may be more or less than the expenditures noted above depending on available revenue. If no alternative expenditure limitation is approved, the state-imposed expenditure limitation will apply to the town. ALTERNATIVE EXPENDITURE LIMITATION (Home Rule Option) DETAILED ANALYSIS Pursuant to the Arizona State Constitution, the Town of Oro Valley as authorized by Resolution No. (R)18-___, passed on April 18, 2018 will seek voter approval to adopt an alternative expenditure limitation (Home Rule Option) to apply to the Town for the next four years beginning in 2019-2020. Under a Home Rule Option if approved by the voters, the town estimates it will be allowed to expend approximately $132,670,853 in 2019-2020, $122,275,100 in 2020-2021, $120,881,163 in 2021-2022 and $124,450,003 in 2022-2023. With approval of the Home Rule Option, the town will utilize the expenditure authority for all local budgetary purposes including Public Safety, Streets and Roads Maintenance, Development Services, Transit Services, Parks and Recreation, Tourism and Economic Development, Water Utility, Magistrate Court, Stormwater Utility, Administration, Capital Improvement Projects, Municipal Debt Service and Contingency Reserves. We estimate that the expenditures for the next four years under the Home Rule Option will be as follows: ESTIMATED AMOUNTS TO BE EXPENDED IN SPECIFIC AREAS Purpose 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 Public Safety $18,053,036 $18,399,152 $18,854,185 $19,130,469 Streets and Roads Maintenance 4,397,151 4,445,786 4,551,998 4,597,518 Development Services 3,450,812 3,586,518 3,727,227 3,801,772 Transit Services 1,614,568 1,646,859 1,679,797 1,713,392 Parks & Recreation 10,348,481 10,589,361 10,835,595 11,016,307 Tourism & Economic Development 1,175,000 1,185,422 1,202,729 1,226,784 Water Utility 13,147,050 13,129,746 14,750,905 15,265,754 Magistrate Court 938,044 969,144 1,001,284 1,021,310 Stormwater Utility 1,470,500 1,486,000 1,498,000 1,527,910 Administration 10,600,476 10,960,899 11,180,597 11,463,367 Capital Improvement Projects 14,120,491 3,073,826 4,932,220 5,841,660 Municipal Debt Service 6,153,661 6,149,212 6,147,709 7,012,532 Contingency Reserves 47,201,583 46,653,175 40,518,917 40,831,228 Total Expenditures $132,670,853 $122,275,100 $ 120,881,163 $ 124,450,003 If approved, the expenditures authorized will be funded from revenues obtained from federal, state and local sources. It is estimated that the amount of revenue from each source for the next four years will be as follows: ESTIMATED AMOUNTS OF REVENUE FROM EACH AND ANY SOURCE Source 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 Federal $653,336 $659,169 $665,061 $666,000 State 14,261,243 14,934,784 15,281,226 15,666,433 Local 117,756,274 106,681,147 104,934,876 108,117,570 Total Revenues $ 132,670,853 $ 122,275,100 $ 120,881,163 $ 124,450,003 The Town of Oro Valley has no local property tax. In determining the revenue sources to fund the authorized additional expenditures under the alternative expenditure limitation, it is assumed that the federal, state and local revenues received by the town will continue to be available in 2019-2020 as they have for the past four years. Their continued availability is also assumed for the next three consecutive years following 2019-2020. Any and all dollar figures in this analysis are estimated figures only and are based upon information available at the time of preparation of this report. The budget and actual expenditures in any given year may be more or less than the figures noted above depending on available revenues. The actual expenditure limitation for each fiscal year shall be adopted as an integral part of the budget for that fiscal year.    Town Council Regular Session Item # 2. Meeting Date:04/04/2018   Requested by: Bayer Vella  Submitted By:Milini Simms, Community Development & Public Works Department:Community Development & Public Works Information SUBJECT: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING A CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN, LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RECREATION AREA PLAN FOR SAGUAROS VIEJOS PHASE 1, A 44-LOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION, LOCATED WEST OF LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD AND NORTH OF NARANJA ROAD RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant's proposal is for the development of a 44-lot single-family residential subdivision on an approximately 56-acre property, located west of La Cholla Boulevard and north of Naranja Drive (Attachment 2). The proposed subdivision design was previously approved twice. The last approval expired in 2016 due to lack of activity (per code requirement), which is why the applicant is requesting another approval of the same design. The request includes a Conceptual Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Recreation Area Plan. Key elements of the proposal are:  Approximately 16 acres (29%) of preserved riparian areas (environmentally sensitive open space) Approximately 879 (84%) saguaros will either be transplanted or preserved in place, which includes 27 Saguaros deemed significant (as defined by the Zoning Code) Gated community with two points of vehicular access: One from Glover Road and the other from Naranja Drive Average lot size of 30,087 sq. ft. Maximum building height of 18' for either 1 or 2 stories with one-story restrictions on lots 1, 9, 17 The Conceptual Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Recreation Area Plan conform to the Design Principles and applicable Design Standards of the Zoning Code. As such, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the applicant's request, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1. BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: Land Use Context  The subject property is designated Low Density Residential in the General Plan and is zoned R1-20. The existing land use and zoning designations for the property and surrounding areas are provided in Attachment 3. Existing Site Conditions  56 acres, property is vacant Characterized by riparian corridors running north to south, along the perimeter of the property and approximately 1047 Saguaros Proposed Improvements:  44 single-family detached residential lots Approximately 16 acres (29%) of preserved riparian areas Approximately 879 (84%) Saguaros will either be transplanted or preserved in place, which includes 27 Saguaros deemed significant (as defined by the Zoning Code) One recreation area provided totaling approximately 2.2 acres Two points of ingress/egress improvements to Glover Road, including a shared-use path along the south side Approvals to Date  2007 - Rezoning from R1-144 to R1-20 approved for both phases of the project. 2014 - Conceptual Site Plan approved for both phases of the project; expired in 2016. Conformance with previous approvals: Since the approved rezoning and Conceptual Site Plan, the project was split into two phases. The applicant's request for the first phase conforms to the previously-approved rezoning and accompanying Tentative Development Plan. DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS Conceptual Site Plan The Conceptual Site Plan (Attachment 4) is for 44 single-family residential lots on approximately 56 acres. The overall design of the subdivision is consistent with the previously-approved Tentative Development Plan. Conceptual Site Plans are reviewed for their conformance to the Design Guidelines and applicable Design Standards in the Zoning Code. A detailed analysis of which is provided in Attachment 5. Notable elements of the subdivision include:  The design provides an effective transition between large lot residential to the west and proposed small lot residential to the east through the placement of larger lots and natural buffers along the western and eastern perimeters, preserving riparian areas. Use of detention basins to assure post-development drainage conditions are consistent with pre-developed conditions and all habitable structures adjacent to the washes are protected from flooding and erosion. The proposed development will have two gated access points from Glover Road and Naranja Drive. The access points help distribute traffic around the site, reducing the impact to surrounding streets.  Glover Road: Off-site improvements to mitigate increased traffic include right-of-way dedication and the widening/extension of Glover Road along the project frontage by the developer, which are shown on the plan. Naranja Drive: In 2015, the Town  widened the road which created a painted center median that doubles as a continuous left-turn lane for westbound vehicles entering Ironwood Ridge High School (south of the subject property). These improvements met the intended results and as a result, traffic along Naranja Drive is relatively free flowing and a good level of service for motorists. An important component of the subdivision design is the identification of significant Saguaros. Both staff and the applicant worked extensively to research and identify healthy Saguaros that would not survive transplant. As such, a condition of approval to preserve eight (8) Saguaros, which are at least 24 feet in height with at least two (2) arms, in place by adjusting the lot lines and layout, is included in Attachment 1. These cacti are generally located near the proposed lot lines (for specifics, see Attachment 6) and therefore the adjustments will not substantially change the conceptual site plan. Conceptual Landscape Plan The Conceptual Landscape Plan (Attachment 7) is in conformance with the applicable Zoning Code requirements. The Conceptual Landscape Plan includes landscaped entries and common areas. The landscape plan also preserves the riparian corridors, running north to south through the property, along the perimeter of the property. Conceptual Recreation Area Plan A 2.2- acre recreation area (Attachment 8) is proposed in the southeastern portion of the subdivision adjacent to natural preserved open space. The area provided exceeds the Zoning Code requirement of 1 acre pre 85 units by 1.7 acres. The proposed recreation area contains both active and passive amenities, including:  A recreation trail Three (3) fitness stations Six (6) picnic benches Two (2) picnic tables One (1) barbeque One (1) 24' x 24' ramada Three (2) shade structures One (1) pet station The recreation area is accessible to all residents and provides both vehicular and bicycle parking areas. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION The applicant's request was heard by the Planning and Zoning Commission on March 6, 2017 (for meeting minutes, see Attachment 9). The main topics discussed were the request's conformance to previously approved plans and preservation of Saguaros onsite. The following information clarifies these points:  The layout presented is the exact same as the previous approval in 2014, which per code expired after two years of inactivity. In addition to preserving the eight (8) cacti in place (Attachment 5), the applicant will also comply with code requirements for salvage and mitigation of all other healthy cacti onsite, regardless of size. At the conclusion of the meeting, the Commission recommended approval of the request, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Several neighborhood meetings were held during the rezoning process for this property. However, since that was nine years ago, an additional neighborhood meeting was held in March 2017, in conjunction with the second phase of this project. Since there were not any outstanding concerns from residents regarding this first phase, no additional neighborhood meetings were required. Summary of Public Notice: Public notice has been provided:  Homeowners Association mailing Post at Town Hall and on website Postcard to all property owners within 600 feet CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION In summary, the request is in conformance with the Design Principles and applicable Design Standards of the Zoning Code and General Plan. Additionally, the proposed plans conform to the previously approved rezoning and accompanying Tentative Development Plan. As such, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A. SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to APPROVE the Conceptual Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Recreation Area Plan for Phase 1 of the Saguaros Viejos subdivision, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1, finding the request is in conformance with the Design Principles and applicable Design Standards. OR I MOVE to DENY the Conceptual Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Recreation Area Plan for Phase 1 of the Saguaros Viejos subdivision finding _____________________________. Attachments ATTACHMENT 1- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL  ATTACHMENT 2- LOCATION MAP  ATTACHMENT 3- LAND USE AND ZONING TABLE  ATTACHMENT 4- CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN  ATTACHMENT 5- DESIGN PRINCIPLES AND STANDARDS ANALYSIS  ATTACHMENT 6- SAGUARO MAP  ATTACHMENT 7- CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN  ATTACHMENT 8- RECREATION AREA PLAN  ATTACHMENT 9- PZC MEETING MINUTES 3.6.18  Saguaro Viejos Phase 1 Conditions of Approval 1. Lot configuration must be adjusted during final design review to preserve the eight (8) healthy Saguaros that are twenty-four feet (24’) or taller with two (2) or more arms, in place. 2. A revised typical cross section for Glover Road is provided on the Final Site Plan, as follows: a. Section 1: Provide a 6-foot multi-use lane along the southern side of the road. b. Section 1: Provide a 6-inch vertical curb along the southern side of the road. c. Section 7: Provide 6-inch vertical curbs along both sides of the road. d. Section 8: Provide a 6-foot multi-use lane along the southern side of the road. e. Section 8: Provide 6-inch vertical curbs along both sides of the road. SAGUARO VIEJOS PHASE 1 Location Map (OV1701536) Attachment 2 Yellow Line=Boundary of Phase 1 Naranja Drive La Cholla Blvd.Glover Road Wilson K-8 Ironwood Ridge HS Estates at Capella Custom Homes Ironwood Ranch SAGUARO VIEJOS PHASE 1 Land Use and Zoning Table (OV1701536) Attachment 3 EXISTING LAND USE GENERAL PLAN ZONING SUBJECT PROPERTY Vacant Low Density Residential R1-20 NORTH Wilson K-8 School Low Density Residential and School R1-144 SOUTH Ironwood Ridge High School School R1-144 EAST Vacant Medium Density Residential R1-20 WEST Single Family Residential Low Density Residential R1-144 Attachment 5 Saguaro Viejos Phase 1 Conceptual Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Recreation Area Plan Conceptual Design Principles and Design Standards Analysis Conceptual Site Plan The Conceptual Site Plan is for 44 single-family residential lots on approximately 56 acres. The overall design and layout of the subdivision is generally consistent with the Tentative Development Plan approved as part of the prior rezoning application and preserves approximately 16 acres of riparian areas, which are environmentally sensitive. The table below provides a summary of the proposed subdivision: Total Lots 44 Density .79 du/ac Lot Size Minimum 16,000 sq. ft. Average 30,087 sq. ft. Max. Building Height 18’ / 2 stories Single story on lots 1,9, 17 Setbacks Front 24 ft. Side 15 ft. Rear 24 ft. Open Space 29% (approx. 16 acres) Conceptual Site Design Principles, Section 22.9.D.5.a The Conceptual Site Plan, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1, is in conformance with applicable Conceptual Site Design Principles. Following are applicable Design Principles (in italics), followed by staff analysis. Building orientation: the location, orientation and size of structures shall promote a complementary relationship of structures to one another. Staff Commentary: The subject property is situated between schools to the north and south, large-lot residential to the west and a pending rezoning to smaller-residential lots to the east. As such, the subdivision places larger lots along the western perimeter and 25’ buffers along the northern and southern perimeters. The homes will incorporate standard entry and side entry garages that will provide for a varied streetscape. Drainage/grading: site grading shall minimize impacts on natural grade and landforms and provide for subtle transitions of architectural elements to grade. Significant cuts and fills in relation to natural grade shall be avoided or minimized to the extent practical given property constraints. Staff Commentary: The topography of the site is characterized by riparian corridors, running north to south along the western and eastern edges of the subdivision. The subdivision design primarily avoids these areas, preserving them as undisturbed natural open space, and includes a 15-foot protective apron to ensure disturbance from construction does not occur. The property slopes from north to south but no significant cuts or fills will be necessary. A full drainage report will be required as part of the Final Design review submittal to verify conformance with the Town’s Drainage Criteria Manual. All post-development flow shall be mitigated and released in the same manner and quantity as the existing conditions. Connectivity: strengthen the usability and connectivity of the pedestrian environment intern ally and externally by6 enhancing access to the public street system, transit, adjoining development and pedestrian and bicycle transportation routes. Buildings and uses should provide access to adjacent open space and recreational areas where appropriate. Staff Commentary: Sidewalks are proposed throughout the subdivision to improve pedestrian connectivity. A recreation trail will also connect both phases of the larger Saguaro Viejos subdivision. Additionally, a shared-use path will be constructed on the south side of Glover Road connecting to the existing path from La Cholla Boulevard. Design Standards Analysis The proposed Conceptual Site Plan has been reviewed for conformance with the Conceptual Site Design Standards. Following are key Design Standards (in italics), followed by staff’s commentary. Section 3.1.A.1.a: Place open space elements visible from roadways within residential areas. Section 3.1.A.1.c: Provide open space at project entries. Staff Commentary: The subdivision design provides enhanced buffer yards at both entry points, along Glover Road and Naranja Drive. Additionally, riparian areas surround the subdivision to the west and east. These areas provide extensive buffers visible from roadways and surrounding homes. Section 3.1.B.2: Street trees, landscape themes, varied setbacks or architectural treatments shall be used to provide individual street character. Staff Commentary: The applicant’s proposal incorporates a housing product that will utilize varied setbacks and entries, including side entry garages, which will provide for diversity and individual street character. Section 3.1.D.4: Pedestrian connections shall be provided between neighborhoods Staff Commentary: The proposed subdivision will incorporate sidewalks throughout and include a shared-use path along Glover Road. Furthermore, a recreation trail connecting the two phases of this subdivision is proposed through the natural open space. Conceptual Landscape Plan The Conceptual Landscape Plan is in conformance with the applicable Zoning Code requirements. The Conceptual Landscape Plan includes landscaped entries, as well as landscaping in all common areas. The landscape plan preserves the riparian areas located along the western and eastern perimeters of the property Recreation Area Plan The Recreation Area Plan includes both passive and active elements. The subdivision includes one recreation area, which exceeds the required amount of acres per lots and is centrally located accessible to all lots. The recreation area features passive and active amenities which includes seating, shade, fitness stations, a recreation trail and more. SAGUARO VIEJOS PHASE 1 SAGUAROS TO PRESERVE IN PLACE (OV1701536) Attachment 6 234 1236 1503 2202 2268 2660 2721 2831 TAG HEIGHT ARMS 234 24 7 1236 26 9 1503 24 7 2202 30 25 2268 25 7 2660 30 8 2721 35 16 2831 35 15 PH. 1 PH. 2 PH. 1 PH. 2 PH. 1 PH. 2 PH. 1 PH. 2 PH. 1 PH. 2 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTQ:\199032\B-003 Saguaros Viejos Ph. 1 Westside\02 Landscape\06 CLP\199032 saguaro viejos_land 1.dwg Plotted: Nov. 15, 2017 - 12:16pmLandscape Architecture Urban DesignOffices located in Tucson, Phoenix,Engineering Planning SurveyingTucson, Arizona (520) 881-74804444 East BroadwayFlagstaff, Arizona, and Las Vegas, NevadaCONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLANSAGUAROS VIEJOS - PHASE 1OV1701536DEVELOPER DATEPLANNING & ZONING ADMINISTRATORAPPROVALSEE SHEET 3SEE SHEET 4SEE SHEET 5OWNER LIN TRUST & KINO INVESTMENT GROUPPHONE: (520) 744-85006088 W. ARIZONA PAVILIONS DRIVE SUITE 1ATTENTION: GREG WEXLERMARANA, AZ 85743SHEET 1 SHEET 6SHEET 2 THRU 5SHEET INDEXCOVER SHEETLANDSCAPE PLANENTRY PLANTING - 20 SCALE AND TYPICAL BUFFERYARD PLANTINGgreg@swvp.comPLANTS REQUIRED/100'BUFFERYARD NOTES WIDTH#1 NORTHBUFFERYARD'B'TYPE1.25'4TREESPLANTS PROVIDED/100'ACCENTS5 10SHRUBS ACCENTS TREESGROUNDCOVERDG/TREATMENT2.GLOVER ROAD4 5 10SHRUBSBUFFERYARDS ARE BASED ON REQUIREMENTS OF OVZCR BUFFERYARD TABLE 27-7.NARANJA DRIVE IS CLASSIFIED AS AN ARTERIAL STREETNO BUFFERYARD REQUIRED#2 EASTR1-20 RESIDENTIALNARANJA DRIVEPUBLIC STREET'B' 25'4 5 10 4 510PRIVATE STREET#3 WESTR1-144 RESIDENTIALNO BUFFERYARD REQUIREDHYDROSEEDDG/HYDROSEEDGENERAL NOTESTHE GROSS AREA OF THIS DEVELOPMENT IS 55.98 ACRESTOTAL GRADED AREA IS 11.3 ± ACRESTOTAL UNDISTURBED AREA = 44.7 ACRESTOTAL AMOUNT OF OPEN SPACE REQUIRED = 0%. TOTAL OPEN SPACE PROVIDED =25.96% (14.53 ACRES)TOTAL AMOUNT OF LANDSCAPED COMMON AREAS = 2.72% (1.52 ACRES).COMMON AREAS / OPEN SPACE SHALL BE OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY THE H.O.A.EXISTING ZONING IS R1-20SETBACKS REQUIRED/PROVIDED: FRONT=30 FEET, SIDE=15 FEET, REAR=30 FEET.BUFFERYARD TYPES: BUFFERYARD "B" NORTH & SOUTHASSURANCES FOR LANDSCAPING AND RE-VEGETATION BONDS MUST BE POSTED PRIORTO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS.PROPERTY OWNER SHALL MAINTAIN BUFFERYARD PLANTINGS TO ENSUREUNOBSTRUCTED VISIBILITY TO MOTORISTS. ALL SHRUBS, ACCENTS, ANDGROUNDCOVERS SHALL NOT EXCEED THIRTY (30) INCHES IN HEIGHT WITHIN SITEVISIBILITY TRIANGLES. TREES WITHIN SITE VISIBILITY TRIANGLES WILL BE MAINTAINEDTO ENSURE THAT BRANCHES / FOLIAGE ARE NOT BELOW A HEIGHT OF SIX (6') FEET.IN THE EVENT OF ABANDONMENT OF THE SITE AFTER GRADING / DISTURBANCE OFNATURAL AREAS, DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RE-VEGETATED WITH A NON-IRRIGATEDHYDRO SEED MIX FROM OVZCR ADDENDUM D: APPROVED REVEGETATION SEED MIX.ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL MEET THE MINIMUM STANDARDS CONTAINED IN THECURRENT EDITIONS OF THE ARIZONA NURSERY ASSOCIATION'S GROWERS COMMITTEERECOMMENDED TREE SPECIFICATIONS AND THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OFNURSERYMEN AS TO SIZE, CONDITION AND APPEARANCE.PROPERTY OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING THE TEMPORARY IRRIGATIONSYSTEM AS LONG AS NECESSARY IN ORDER TO TRANSITION PLANTS OVER TO NATURALSOURCES. ANY PLANT MATERIALS THAT DIE IN TRANSITION, FOR ANY REASONS, SHALLBE REPLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 27.6.E.4., MAINTENANCE.LANDSCAPE SHALL CONFORM TO ORO VALLEY LANDSCAPE CODE.MITIGATION OF SURVEYED PLANTS IN THE NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLAN WILL BEINCORPORATED INTO THE LANDSCAPE DESIGN.TREE AND SHRUB LOCATIONS ARE PRELIMINARY.ALL PLANTS TO BE IRRIGATED WITH AN UNDERGROUND AUTOMATIC DRIP IRRIGATIONSYSTEM.HYDROSEED ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY GRADING OPERATIONS AROUND LOTS ANDALONG ROADS. DECOMPOSED GRANITE SHALL BE PLACED AT ENTRIES.LANDSCAPE AREAS THAT ARE SUSCEPTIBLE TO DAMAGE BY PEDESTRIAN OR AUTOTRAFFIC SHALL BE PROTECTED BY CURBS, TREE GUARDS OR OTHER DEVICES.LANDSCAPE SHALL BE DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE SEDIMENT, SAND AND GRAVEL BEINGCARRIED INTO THE STREETS BY STORM WATER OR OTHER RUNOFF.LANDSCAPE DESIGN ENABLES ADEQUATE PLANT SPACING TO ENSURE SURVIVABILITYAT PLANT MATURITY.ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS ARE TO BE FINISHED WITH A NATURAL TOPPING OF AT LEASTTWO (2) INCHES IN DEPTH.TREES AND LARGE SHRUBS SHALL BE ADEQUATELY SUPPORTED WHEN PLANTEDANY SPADED OR BOXED TREE TRANSPLANTED ON SITE THAT DIES DUE TO NEGLECT ORLACK OF MAINTENANCE SHALL BE REPLACED WITH THE SAME SIZE AND SPECIES OFTHE ORIGINAL SALVAGED TREE, AS REQUIRED BY THE SALVAGE PLAN.THE LIMITS OF GRADING SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD, IN ACCORDANCE WITHSECTION 27.6.B.7.c.ii. DISTURBANCE OUTSIDE THE APPROVED GRADING LIMITS SHALLNOT BE PERMITTED.THE DEVELOPER SHALL REPLACE REMOVED OR DAMAGED PLANT MATERIALS WITH LIKESIZE AND SPECIES, AND SHALL MAINTAIN AND GUARANTEE THE REPLACEMENT PLANTMATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF THREE (3) YEARS.NO SALVAGE OF PLANTS REGULATED BY THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT AND/OR THEARIZONA NATIVE PLANT LAW MAY OCCUR WITHOUT THE ISSUANCE OF THEAPPROPRIATE PERMIT BY THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.DEEP ROOTED VEGETATION AND TREES SHALL NOT BE PLANTED CLOSER THAN 7.5FEET FROM A PUBLIC WATER LINE. EXCEPTIONS FOR ALTERNATIVE DESIGN SOLUTIONSSUCH AS ROOT BARRIERS SHALL BE CONSIDERED ON A CASE BY CASE BASIS.14.15.16.17.18.19.20.21.22.23.24.25.26.1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.13.27.SEE SHEET 2SCALE 1"=250'PROJECT LAYOUTMERITAGE HOMES3275 WEST INA ROAD,SUITE 220TUCSON, AZ 85741 PHONE: (520) 225-6800ATTN: LISA HOSKINLISA.HOSKIN@MERITAGEHOMES.COMTHE WLB GROUP, INC.4444 E. BROADWAY BLVD.TUCSON, AZ. 85711 (520) 881-7480 ATTN:GARY GRIZZLEGGRIZZLE@WLBGROUP.COM28.#4 SOUTHAMOUNT OF SIGNIFICANT VEGETATION DISTURBED = 7566 ± SQ. FT.PERCENTAGE OF SIGNIFICANT VEGETATION DISTURBED = 100%AMOUNT OF SIGNIFICANT VEGETATION = 7566 ± SQ. FT.SIGNIFICANT VEGETATION MITIGATIONMITIGATION OF SIGNIFICANT VEGETATION SHALL BE IN A ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 27.6.B.4.j.COMMON NAMEBOTANICAL NAMENATIVE PLANT SUMMARYTOTAL PER PLANT14812716100317946231PRESERVE IN PLACEWHITE RIBBON0000000BLUE RIBBONTRANSPLANT6115102771911421261231603RED RIBBONDESTROY0351272100SAGAUROMESQUITEWHITETHORN ACACIACAT CLAW ACACIABLUE PALO VERDEFOOTHILL PALO VERDEDESERT HACKBERRYFISH-HOOK BARRELCARNEGIEA GIGANTEAPROSOPIS VELUTINAACACIA CONSTRICTAACACIA GREGGIICERCIDIUM FLORIDIUMCELTIS PALLIDAFEROCACTUS WISLIZNEIICERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUMTOTALPENIOCEREUS GREGGIIDESERT NIGHT-BLOOMING CEREUS04234529.2424 MATCHLINE SEE SHEET 2Q:\199032\B-003 Saguaros Viejos Ph. 1 Westside\02 Landscape\06 CLP\199032 saguaro viejos_land 2.dwg Plotted: Nov. 15, 2017 - 12:19pmLandscape Architecture Urban DesignOffices located in Tucson, Phoenix,Engineering Planning SurveyingTucson, Arizona (520) 881-74804444 East BroadwayFlagstaff, Arizona, and Las Vegas, NevadaACCENTSSHRUBSTREESBOULDERS MATCHLINE SEE SHEET 2MATCHLINE SEE SHEET 4ACCENTSSHRUBSTREESBOULDERSQ:\199032\B-003 Saguaros Viejos Ph. 1 Westside\02 Landscape\06 CLP\199032 saguaro viejos_land 3.dwg Plotted: Nov. 15, 2017 - 12:20pmLandscape Architecture Urban DesignOffices located in Tucson, Phoenix,Engineering Planning SurveyingTucson, Arizona (520) 881-74804444 East BroadwayFlagstaff, Arizona, and Las Vegas, NevadaCall at least two full working daysbefore you begin excavation.Dial 8-1-1 or 1-800-STAKE-IT (782-5348)In Maricopa County: (602) 263-1100 MATCHLINE SEE SHEET 3MATCHLINE SEE SHEET 5Q:\199032\B-003 Saguaros Viejos Ph. 1 Westside\02 Landscape\06 CLP\199032 saguaro viejos_land 4.dwg Plotted: Nov. 15, 2017 - 12:23pmLandscape Architecture Urban DesignOffices located in Tucson, Phoenix,Engineering Planning SurveyingTucson, Arizona (520) 881-74804444 East BroadwayFlagstaff, Arizona, and Las Vegas, NevadaACCENTSSHRUBSTREESBOULDERS MATCHLINE SEE SHEET 4Q:\199032\B-003 Saguaros Viejos Ph. 1 Westside\02 Landscape\06 CLP\199032 saguaro viejos_land 5.dwg Plotted: Nov. 15, 2017 - 12:25pmLandscape Architecture Urban DesignOffices located in Tucson, Phoenix,Engineering Planning SurveyingTucson, Arizona (520) 881-74804444 East BroadwayFlagstaff, Arizona, and Las Vegas, NevadaACCENTSSHRUBSTREESBOULDERS NORTH ENTRY GLOVER ROADENTRY WALLENTRY WALL, TYP.SVTSVTWATER LINE, TYP.SHARED USE PATHSEE OFFSITE PLANSQ:\199032\B-003 Saguaros Viejos Ph. 1 Westside\02 Landscape\06 CLP\199032 saguaro viejos_land 6.dwg Plotted: Nov. 15, 2017 - 12:30pmLandscape Architecture Urban DesignOffices located in Tucson, Phoenix,Engineering Planning SurveyingTucson, Arizona (520) 881-74804444 East BroadwayFlagstaff, Arizona, and Las Vegas, NevadaSVTNARANJA DRIVESEWER LINEENTRY/EXIT GATESENTRY WALLENTRY WALL, TYP.SEWER LINE, TYP.LOT 41KEY PADPROPOSED CULVERTLOT 20SOUTH ENTRY ACCENTSSHRUBSTREESBOULDERSTYPICAL NATURAL BUFFERYARD ENHANCEMENT PLANTINGBUFERYARD25' ENHANCED NATURALPLANT REQUIREMENTS, TYPICALEXISTING VEGETATION MEETS BUFERYARDADDITIONAL PLANTS AS REQUIRED TOENHANCE 25' NATURAL BUFFERYARDENTRY/EXIT GATESBASIN 2DG. (TYP.)DG. (TYP.)DG. (TYP.)DG. (TYP.)TYPICALEXISTING TREE LOCATION, Q:\199032\B-003 Saguaros Viejos Ph. 1 Westside\02 Landscape\07 RAP\199032 saguaro viejos_rec area1.dwg Plotted: Nov. 15, 2017 - 12:32pmRECREATIONAL AREA PLAN LAYOUTCOVER SHEETSHEET INDEXSHEET 2SHEET 1 MARANA, AZ 85743ATTENTION: GREG WEXLER6088 W. ARIZONA PAVILIONS DRIVE SUITE 1PHONE: (520) 744-8500LIN TRUST & KINO INVESTMENT GROUPOWNER GLOVER ROADPROJECT LAYOUTSCALE 1"=200'NARANJA DRIVELA CHOLLA BOULEVARD XERORI P A R I A N A R E A 4.5.6.7.3.GENERAL NOTES2.1.RECREATIONAL AREASEE SHEET 2greg@swvp.comRECREATIONAL AREA PLANSAGUAROS VIEJOS - PHASE 1OV1701536RECREATIONAL AREA PLAN DETAILSSHEET 3RECREATION AREA CALCULATIONS REQUIRED = 44 LOTS / 85 = 0.52 ACRES (22,549 S.F.)PROVIDED = 2.2 ACRES (96,196 S.F.)PROVIDED = 3 x ACTIVE RECREATION:- 3 FITNESS STATIONS1.1.4 x PASSIVE RECREATION:- PICNIC TABLES- SHADE STRUCTURE- TRAIL- BENCHESPLANNING & ZONING ADMINISTRATORDATEAPPROVALTOTAL AMOUNT OF PARKING REQUIRED = ONE SPACE per 20 DWELLING UNITS FOR THEFIRST HUNDRED DWELLINGS.44 DWELLINGS / 20 = 3 SPACESTOTAL PARKING SPACES REQUIRED = 3TOTAL PARKING SPACES PROVIDED = 3 INCLUDING 1 ACCESSIBLE SPACE PER OVZCR27.7.E TABLE 27-15.RECREATION AREA PARKING CALCULATIONSRECREATION PROVISIONSMERITAGE HOMES3275 WEST INA ROAD, SUITE 220ATTN: LISA HOSKINTUCSON, AZ 85741PHONE: (520) 225-6800LISA.HOSKIN@MERITAGEHOMES.COMDEVELOPER THIS RECREATIONAL AREA PLAN IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS ANDINTENTIONS OF THE FOLLOWING PLANS AND ORDINANCES:A.THE RECREATIONAL AREA PLAN REQUIREMENTS, SECTION 26.5B.THE NATIVE PLANT SALVAGE AND LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS, SECTION 27.6C.ORO VALLEY LANDSCAPE CODE, SECTION 27.6.EXISTING ZONING: R1-20GROSS AREA OF THIS DEVELOPMENT = 55.98 ACRESTOTAL AMOUNT OF LANDSCAPED COMMON AREAS = 1.08 ACRESRECREATIONAL FACILITIES AND PARKING IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE COMPLETED AND INPLACE BY THE TIME THIRTY-FIVE (35) PERCENT OF THE BUILDING PERMITS ARE ISSUED.TRAIL ALIGNMENT TO BE FIELD ADJUSTED AS NEEDED TO AVOID PROTECTED NATIVEPLANTS AND SIGNIFCANT VEGETATION.COMMON AREAS SHALL BE OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY THE H.O.A.ALL RECREATION EQUIPMENT WILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT ADA REQUIREMENTS.A MINIMUM OF 50% OF PLAY EQUIPMENT OR APPARATUS TO BE FULLY SHADED WITH A UVRESISTANT SUN SHADE.DURING THE LIFE OF THE PROJECT, CONTROL AND ERADICATION OF NON-NATIVEINVASIVE PLANT SPECIES SUCH AS BUFFLEGRASS, FOUNTAIN GRASS, SOFT FEATHERPAPPUSGRASS, RUSSIAN THISTLE, TELEGRAPH PLANT, DESERT BROOM, RAGWEED,PIGWEED, BURRO BRUSH, ETC.) SHALL BE WEEDED IN ORDER TO PREVENT THE SPREADOF SUCH SPECIES ONTO ADJACENT PROPERTIES.REFER TO THE PRELIMINARY PLAT, LANDSCAPE PLAN AND NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATIONPLANS (SEE GENERAL NOTES) FOR CONSISTENCY IN DEVELOPMENT.8.9.10.1.REQUIRED RECREATION PROVISIONS = 2 ACTIVE AND 2 PASSIVE (BASED ONREQUIRED 0.52 ACRES)11. 23416AREAS OF SIGNIFICANT VEGETATIONDENOTES LARGE TREES / PALO VERDE - MESQUITERECREATIONAL TRAIL - STABILIZED DECOMPOSED GRANITE TRAIL(SAGUAROS)RECREATION EQUIPMENT KEYNOTES5(STAKE TRAIL IN FIELD FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION)ALIGNMENT TO BE FIELD ADJUSTED AS NEEDED TO AVOIDPROTECTED NATIVE PLANTS AND SIGNIFCANT VEGETATION.AERIAL PHOTO100 YEAR FLOOD PLAINLIMB-UP AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE ACCESS TO SEATING AREA)PROJECT LAYOUTSCALE 1"= 30'SCALE 1"= 50'TYP.XERORIPARIAN AREAEXISTING LARGE TREE : PALO VERDETRAIL TO BE PRIMITIVE THROUGH RIPARIAN AREAS TO FURTHERMINIMIZE DISTURBANCE.PARKING AREAQ:\199032\B-003 Saguaros Viejos Ph. 1 Westside\02 Landscape\07 RAP\199032 saguaro viejos_rec area2.dwg Plotted: Nov. 15, 2017 - 12:44pmRECREATION LEGEND7A891011OR MESQUITE, TYPICALLOT LINEALIGN TRAIL TO AVOIDSIGNIFICANT VEGETATIONPROPERTY BOUNDARY7B7C7E6' BENCH (6): WABASH CN420D. IN-GROUND MOUNT PER MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS.COLOR: BEIGE AVAILABLE FROM DAVE BANG (800) 456-7903.TRASH RECEPTACLE (2): WABASH LR300D. COLOR: BEIGE WITH MATCHING FT200N LID. SURFACEMOUNT PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. AVAILABLE FROM DAVE BANG (800) 456-7903.BIKE LOOPS (4): WAUSAU MF9006. IN-GROUND MOUNT PER MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS.COLOR: MF-BEIGE. AVAILABLE FROM DAVE BANG (800) 456-7903.PET STATION (1): "DOGIPOT" #1003-L. METAL RECEPTACLE & DISPENSER, ALUMINUM "ON-LEASH"SIGN, GALVANIZED POST. COLOR: "FOREST GREEN". AVAILABLE FROM: PRO-PET DESTRIBUTORS, 20801SANTA FE AVE., CARSON, CA. 90810 WWW.PROPET.ORG (407) 240-0953 LOCATE POST NO CLOSERTHAN 5 (FIVE) FEET FROM EDGE OF ASPHALT TRAIL. FACE OF SIGN TO BE PARALLEL TO TRAIL.8' WIDE X 3" THICK STABILIZED DECOMPOSED GRANITE PATHWAY: SEE DETAIL ON SHEET 3. INSTALLPER STABILZER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS.FITNESS STATION: FITNESS EXERCISE STATION. MODEL: 160-020 LEG STRETCH BY MIRACLERECREATION. COLOR: SAND. INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS. CONTACTMONTE CORLEY AT MIRACLEPLAYGROUND [monte@miracleplayground.com]FITNESS STATION: FITNESS EXERCISE STATION. MODEL: 160-003 BODY CURL BY MIRACLERECREATION. COLOR: SAND. INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS. CONTACT MONTECORLEY AT MIRACLEPLAYGROUND [monte@miracleplayground.com]RAMADA: 24' x 24' AMERICANA "NAVAJO" MODEL PRE-ENGINEERED METAL SHADE STRUCTURE WITHMETAL ROOF SYSTEM. COLORS: 'LIGHT GREEN' FOR ROOF PANELS, 'TAN' FOR FRAME.8' PICNIC TABLE (2): WAUSAU TF 3195 ADA. SURFACE MOUNT PER MANUFACTURERRECOMMENDATIONS. COLOR B-3 'WEATHERSTONE SAND'.BBQ: (1) PW ATHLETIC MFG. CO. MODEL 1140-00. SURFACE MOUNT PER MANUFACTURERRECOMMENDATIONS. AVAILABLE FROM DAVE BANG (800) 456-7903.CONCRETE RAMADA PAD PER DETAILS ON SHEET 3.FITNESS STATION: FITNESS EXERCISE STATION. MODEL: 160-015 VERTICAL CLIMB BY MIRACLERECREATION. COLOR: SAND. INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS. CONTACT MONTECORLEY AT MIRACLEPLAYGROUND [monte@miracleplayground.com]FITNESS STATION SIGN (6): MODEL: 160-200-1 BY MIRACLE RECREATION. COLOR: SAND. INSTALLPER MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS. CONTACT MONTE CORLEY AT MIRACLEPLAYGROUND[monte@miracleplayground.com]SIGNIFICANT VEGETATION(TYP.) (CRESTED SAGUARO)42" SCREEN WALLTYP.12SHADE STRUCTURE (3). 20 X 20 X 14 MIRACLE PLAYCOVER SHADE, POST COLOR: SAND.SAIL COLOR: TERRA-COTTA. INSTALL TO MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS.CONTACT MONTE CORLEY AT MIRACLEPLAYGROUND [monte@miracleplayground.com]7DFITNESS STATION: FITNESS EXERCISE STATION. MODEL: 160-011 CHIN UP BY MIRACLE RECREATION.COLOR: SAND. INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS. CONTACT MONTE CORLEY ATMIRACLEPLAYGROUND [monte@miracleplayground.com]A. HOURS OF OPERATION.B. PARK/RECREATIONAL AREA RULES.C. TRESPASSING NOTICE FOR UNAUTHORIZED USERS, INCLUDINGCITATION OF APPLICABLE ORDINANCES/STATUTES.D. NOTICE THAT ALL DOGS MUST BE KEPT ON A LEASHE. EMERGENCY (911) CONTACT INFORMATION TO REPORTSUSPICIOUS OR CRIMINAL ACTIVITY.F. H.O.A. CONTACT INFORMATION TO REPORT MAINTENANCE OR SAFETY ISSUES13PARK SIGN DISPLAYING: 1RAMADA SLAB LAYOUT4CONCRETE JOINTS5CONCRETE PAVING3STABILIZED DECOMPOSED GRANITE PATHWAYPLAN VIEW2" 12" 32" 6'-6" CLEAR CLEARCLEAR 30"30" USE ZONE2BICYCLE PARKING6TYPICAL FITNESS AREASHADE SAIL STRUCTURER = 15'-0", TYP.STABILIZED DECOMPOSEDGRANITE PATHWAYR = 6'-0", TYP.CLEAR8'FITNESS EQUIPMENT SIGNPER SCHEDULEBENCH PER SCHEDULE(WHERE INDICATED ONPLAN)PER SCHEDULEFITNESS EQUIPMENT PER SCHEDULE, TYP.ALLOW FOR MANUFACTURER'S 6'RECOMMENDED CLEAR ZONE, TYP.DECOMPOSED GRANITELIMITS OF STABILIZED FITNESS EQUIPMENT SIGNPER SCHEDULEQ:\199032\B-003 Saguaros Viejos Ph. 1 Westside\02 Landscape\07 RAP\199032 saguaro viejos_rec area3.dwg Plotted: Nov. 15, 2017 - 12:35pm7PARK ENTRY SIGN March 6, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission 1 MINUTES ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR SESSION March 6, 2018 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CAÑADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER Chair Hurt called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Charlie Hurt, Chair Melanie Barrett, Vice Chair Tom Drzazgowski, Commissioner Thomas Gribb, Commissioner Bob Swope, Commissioner Don Cox, Commissioner EXCUSED: Nathan Basken, Commissioner ALSO PRESENT: Bayer Vella, Planning Manager Paul Keesler, Town Engineer David Laws, Permitting Manager Joe Andrews, Chief Civil Deputy Attorney PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Chair Hurt led the audience and Commissioners in the Pledge of Allegiance. CALL TO AUDIENCE There were no speaker requests. COUNCIL LIAISON COMMENTS Council Liaison Bill Rodman did not have any comments. REGULAR SESSION AGENDA March 6, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission 2 1. REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE FEBRUARY 6, 2018 REGULAR SESSION MEETING MINUTES MOTION: A motion was made by Commissioner Cox and seconded by Commissioner Drzazgowski to approve the minutes as written. MOTION carried, 6-0. 2. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON A REQUEST FOR CONCEPTUAL MODEL HOME ARCHITECTURE FOR SPLENDIDO AT RANCHO VISTOSO, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF RANCHO VISTOSO BLVD SOUTH OF VISTOSO HIGHLANDS DRIVE, OV1702737 Senior Planning Technician Patty Hayes gave a presentation that included the following: - Purpose - Location - Site Plan - Design Standards and Principles - Four Sided Architecture - Materials - Colors - Compatibility - Summary and Recommendation Monica Willemsen, representing Solomon Cordwell Buenz, gave a presentation that included the following: - Phase 3B Site Plan - Villas D, E, F and G - Floor plans of each model - Renderings of each model - Proposed materials - Elevations of each model Discussion ensued amongst the Commission and applicant regarding Agenda Item 2. MOTION: A motion was made by Commissioner Cox and seconded by Vice Chair Barrett to approve the Conceptual Model Home Architecture for Splendido Villas D, E, F and G based on the finding that the request complies with the Design Principles and Design Standards of the Zoning Code. MOTION carried, 6-0. 3. PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSSION REGARDING A PROPOSED REZONING FROM R1-144 TO PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT FOR APPROXIMATELY March 6, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission 3 199-ACRES LOCATED WEST OF LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD BETWEEN LAMBERT LANE AND NARANJA DRIVE AND 8.2-ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD AND NARANJA DRIVE, OV1601793 Principal Planner Michael Spaeth gave a presentation that included the following: - Purpose - Location - Proposal - Background information on La Cholla Improvements, La Cholla Corridor, General Plan Amendment and Special Area Policies - Rezoning Request: Review Tools, Planned Area Development, Development Scenarios, Recreation Areas, Code Modifications - Issues associated with Canada Hills Drive - Public Participation Process - Key Factors - Summary and Recommendation Paul Oland, WLB Group, spoke about the length and history of the process for this property. Discussion ensued amongst the Commission, staff and applicant regarding Agenda Item 3. Chair Hurt opened the public hearing. The following individuals spoke on Agenda Item #3: - Oro Valley resident Rosalie Roszak - Oro Valley resident Vicki Stepp (opposed) - Oro Valley resident Mike Sanderson (opposed) - Oro Valley resident Jason Todd - Oro Valley resident Steve Shaffer (opposed) - Oro Valley resident Charles O'Neal (opposed) - Oro Valley resident Kevin Moore Chair Hurt closed the public hearing. Chair Hurt stated this is the first of two public hearings on this item for the Planning and Zoning Commission and there will be another opportunity for the public to speak on this case next month. 4. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION: CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN, LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RECREATION AREA PLAN FOR SAGUARO VIEJOS PHASE 1, A 44 LOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION, LOCATED March 6, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission 4 WEST OF LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD AND NORTH OF NARANJA ROAD, OV1701536 Chair Hurt recessed the meeting at 7:29 p.m. and reconvened at 7:39 p.m. Senior Planner Milini Simms gave a presentation that included the following: - Purpose - Location of Property - History - Conceptual Site Plan - Saguaros - Recreation Area Plan - Conceptual Landscape Plan - Public Participation - Summary and Recommendation Paul Oland, WLB Group, provided a presentation that included background on the densities, appropriate uses of the land and density transition. Discussion ensued amongst the Commission, staff and applicant regarding Agenda Item 4. Chair Hurt opened the public hearing. There were no speaker requests. Chair Hurt closed the public hearing. MOTION: A motion was made by Commissioner Drzazgowski and seconded by Commissioner Cox to recommend approval of the Conceptual Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Recreation Area Plan for Phase 1 of the Saguaro Viejos subdivision, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1, finding the request is in conformance with the Design Principles and applicable Design Standards. MOTION carried, 6-0. 5. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST TO REZONE AN 85.2-ACRE PROPERTY LOCATED NEAR THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF NARANJA DRIVE AND LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD FROM R1-20 AND R1-144 TO R1-7, OV1701685 Senior Planner Milini Simms gave a presentation that included the following: - Purpose - Location - History March 6, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission 5 - Zoning - Review Tools - Tentative Development Plan - Environmental Resources - Public Participation - Summary and Recommendation Paul Oland, WLB Group, provided a presentation that included: - Conservation of saguaros on the property - Glover Road improvements - Density transition in conformance with General Plan Discussion ensued amongst the Commission, staff and applicant regarding Agenda Item 5. Chair Hurt opened the public hearing. The following individuals spoke on Agenda Item 5: Oro Valley resident Diane Peters (opposed) Oro Valley resident Walter Goodwillie (opposed) Oro Valley resident Sarah Bertrand (opposed) Oro Valley resident Eric Gormally (opposed) Chair Hurt closed the public hearing. MOTION: A motion was made by Commissioner Cox and seconded by Commissioner Drzazgowski to recommend approval of the Saguaros Viejos East Rezoning from R1 - 144 and R1-20 to R1-7, including the use of ESL's Flexible Design Options, based on the finding that the request is consistent with the Zoning Code and the Your Voice, Our Future General Plan, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1. Discussion continued amongst the Commission, staff and applicant regarding Agenda Item 3. MOTION failed, 3-3 with Vice Chair Barrett, Commissioner Gribb, and Commissioner Swope opposed. Chief Civil Deputy Attorney Joe Andrews stated that an action needed to be taken, either to continue item to next meeting to revote or break the tie vote tonight. Planning Manager Bayer Vella stated that he would recommend that a vote be taken tonight to move this item forward. March 6, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission 6 Further discussion ensued amongst the Commission, staff and applicant regarding Agenda Item 3. MOTION: A motion was made by Commissioner Cox and seconded by Commissioner Gribb to deny the Saguaros Viejos East Rezoning from R1 -144 and R1-20 to R1-7, based on the finding that the request is not consistent with the Zoning Code and Your Voice, Our Future General Plan as presented, with the understanding that this motion is made to get item to move forward, as a recommending body. MOTION carried, 5-1 with Commissioner Drzazgowski opposed. 6. PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER TO REPLACE EXISTING UTILITY POLES ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF TANGERINE ROAD, BETWEEN SHANNON ROAD AND COPPER MOUNTAIN DRIVE, OV1800362 Planning Manager Bayer Vella gave a presentation that included the following: - Purpose - Location Map - Proposal - Review Tools: Conditional Use Permit Criteria - Photo depicting an existing and proposed pole - Summary and Recommendation Jason Saline, Tucson Electric Power, gave a presentation that included the following: - Purpose and need - What will be built - How it will be built - Design considerations - New poles will be taller and stronger - Nine -foot average height difference - Includes a raptor protection program Discussion ensued amongst the Commission, staff and applicant regarding Agenda Item 6. Chair Hurt opened the public hearing. The following individuals spoke on Agenda Item 6: - Non Oro Valley resident Alyssa Page - Oro Valley resident Timothy Bohen March 6, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission 7 Chair Hurt closed the public hearing. Mr. Saline spoke about the challenges on burying these power lines due to the cost, size of wires and keeping them cool. It is safer and more reliable to have them above ground. MOTION: A motion was made by Commissioner Drzazgowski and seconded by Commissioner Swope to recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit to allow Tucson Electric Power to replace the existing utility poles on the south side of Tangerine Road between Copper Mountain Drive and Shannon Road, based on the finding that the proposal is consistent with the Conditional Use Permit Review Criteria. Vice Chair Barrett would like to suggest the bird nesting feature be included in the staff report for Council to consider. Planning Manager Bayer Vella stated it would be prudent to make this a motion to understand that this is the will of the Commission. Chair Hurt stated that the council members present at this meeting could relay this information to the other council members. MOTION carried, 6-0. 7. PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING A ZONING CODE TEXT AMENDMENT RELATED TO THE ECONOMIC EXPANSION ZONE (EEZ), OV1800397 The meeting was recessed at 9:29 p.m. and reconvened at 9:35 p.m. Planning Manager Bayer Vella gave a presentation that included the following: - Proposed Amendment - Background - Economic Expansion Zone - Recommendation Discussion ensued amongst the Commission and staff regarding Agenda Item 7. Chair Hurt opened the public hearing. The following individual spoke on Agenda Item 7: Oro Valley resident Dave Perry (support). He also referred to his letter that was provided to the Commission. Chair Hurt closed the public hearing. March 6, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission 8 Discussion continued amongst the Commission and staff regarding Agenda Item 7. MOTION: A motion was made by Vice Chair Barrett to recommend approval of the Zoning Code Amendment (Attachment 1) to Section 24.9, related to purpose and applicability of the Economic Expansion Zone (EEZ), with the exception of Miller Ranch due to the fact that the Leman Academy is built on that property. Motion did not receive a second and was lost. MOTION: A motion was made by Commissioner Cox and seconded by Commissioner Drzazgowski to recommend approval of the Zoning Code Amendment (Attachment 1) to Section 24.9, related to purpose and applicability of the Economic Expansion Zone (EEZ). MOTION carried, 6-0. Further discussion continued amongst the Commission and staff regarding Agenda Item 7. 8. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON INITIATION OF CODE AMENDMENT RELATED TO ACREAGE FOR RECREATION Planning Manager Bayer Vella stated this item is only to initiate the process; not voting on any specifics, but just adding to the Planning Work Plan. Vice Chair Barrett explained why she brought forth this issue. Instead of multiple, smaller parks in subdivisions, she would like to see bigger parks that can bring people together. The current zoning code doesn't provide preference for this. Chair Hurt opened the public hearing. The following individual spoke on Agenda Item 8. Non resident Alyssa Page Chair Hurt closed the public hearing. Discussion ensued amongst the Commission and staff regarding Agenda Item 8. MOTION: A motion was made by Vice Chair Barrett and seconded by Commissioner Drzazgowski to continue item not to a date certain. MOTION carried, 6-0. PLANNING UPDATE (INFORMATIONAL ONLY) March 6, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission 9 Planning Manager Bayer Vella reviewed the items currently on the agenda for the next Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on April 3, 2018. ADJOURNMENT Chair Hurt adjourned the meeting at 10:19 p.m. Prepared by: Jeanna Ancona Senior Office Specialist I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the regular session Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of Oro Valley, Arizona held on the 6th day of March, 2018. I further certify that the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present.    Town Council Regular Session Item # 3. Meeting Date:04/04/2018   Requested by: Bayer Vella  Submitted By:Milini Simms, Community Development & Public Works Department:Community Development & Public Works Information SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING ORDINANCE NO. (O)18-06, REQUEST TO REZONE AN 85.2-ACRE PROPERTY LOCATED NEAR THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF NARANJA DRIVE AND LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD FROM R1-20 and R1-144 TO R1-7 RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended denial. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant proposes to rezone an 85.2-acre property from R1-144 and R1-20 to R1-7 to develop a 178 lot single-family residential subdivision, located near the northwest corner of Naranja Drive and La Cholla Boulevard (Attachment 1). The request includes two flexible design options enabled by the Environmentally Sensitive Lands regulations: 1) smaller building setbacks and 2) reduced lot size and width (Attachment 2).   The accompanying Tentative Development Plan (Attachment 3) proposes the following:  Lot sizes ranging from 6,500 square feet (sf) to 16,000 sf Average lot size of 7,320 sf Approximately 33 acres (39%) of preserved environmentally sensitive open space and preservation of significant saguaros A 3.5 acre recreation area Several pedestrian trails including a trail connection for Poppy Trail No. 33 Three access points: Glover Road (north), La Cholla Blvd. (east) and Naranja Drive (south) On March 6, 2018, the Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC) considered this request and recommended denial (for meeting minutes see Attachment 4). The specific concerns of the Commission are shown below in italics, followed by staff commentary. 1. Increased traffic on Naranja Drive In 2015, the Town widened Naranja Drive to create a painted center median which doubles as a continuous left-turn lane for westbound vehicles entering Ironwood High School (located southwest of the subject property). These improvements met the intended results and Naranja Drive, between La Cholla Blvd. and Shannon Rd., is relatively free flowing and provides a good level of service for motorists even during peak school times. Primary traffic flow entering and exiting the proposed development will be from La Cholla Boulevard. Naranja Drive will be secondary and rationally avoided during peak school times. 2. Timing of traffic improvements to Glover Road and La Cholla Boulevard  Off-site improvements to Glover Road will coincide with development of this subdivision or the Phase 1 of Saguaros Viejos (immediately west of the proposed rezoning), whichever connects to Glover Road first. After the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, this condition was refined and revised to reflect the extent and timing of improvements (Attachment 1). Construction for the widening of La Cholla Boulevard to four lanes, is anticipated to begin during the latter half of 2018. The roadway design includes accommodations for the Saguaro Viejos intersection and completion is expected to take approximately 2 years, which coincides with the probable timing of this development. 3. Compatibility between the proposed development and surrounding uses  The proposed subdivision is located between varying land uses ranging from large and small lot residential to potential commercial. To provide an effective transition between these varying land uses, the applicant proposes the following measures:  Placement of larger (approx. 16,000 sf) and fewer lots along the northern and eastern perimeter Using the existing La Cholla Boulevard right-of-way along the eastern perimeter as a 150'-plus buffer Using the existing wash along the western perimeter as a 150'-plus wide natural buffer Internalizing the majority of small lots within the subdivision A more detailed analysis of the traffic impacts and compatibility to surrounding areas is included in Section C of this report. As such staff recommended approval, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1, during the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: A. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND CONTEXT Land Use Context  The existing General Plan land use and zoning districts for the property and surrounding area are provided in Attachment 5. Site Conditions  85.2 acres Property is vacant Two critical wash corridors traversing the site from north to south Numerous saguaros onsite, 13 of which are 24' or taller with 2 or more arms Approvals-To-Date  2007-Rezoning from R1-144 to R1-20 approved for both phases of the project. 2014-Conceptual Site Plan approved for both phases of the project, which expired in 2016 Since the previous approvals, the project was split into two phases. The applicant's request for this phase in comparison with the previous approvals is provided in the table below and shown graphically in Attachment 6:     Previous Approvals  Current Proposal Land Area  Approx. 83 acres  85.2 acres Number of lots  74 lots  178 lots Lot size  16,058 sf to 59,502 sf  6,500 sf to 16,000 sf Average lot size  28,371 sf  7,320 sf Open space conserved  8.2 acres-26% (of entire site) 33 acres-39% B. PROPOSED REZONING The applicant proposes to change the existing zoning from R1-144 and R1-20 to R1-7 to develop a 178 lot, single-family residential subdivision (Attachment 2). 1. Zoning Analysis  The proposed rezoning has been reviewed for conformance with the Zoning Code and the Your Voice Our Future General Plan. A discussion of the application’s conformance with each of these items is provided below. 2. Tentative Development Plan (TDP):  The proposed TDP (Attachment 3) depicts 178 lots with a minimum lot size of 6,500 sf, three access points, a recreational area and multiple trails. Additionally, the design conserves the critical washes onsite (approximately 33 acres of environmentally sensitive open space) and maintains the intent of the original rezoning by placing larger and fewer lots along the northern and eastern perimeters.  The following development standards are notable for this proposal:  Access and Circulation: The property is accessed by three driveways 1) Glover Road (north) 2) La Cholla Blvd. (east) and 3) Naranja Drive (south). The proposed development also incorporates trails and pathways throughout the design, connecting to larger regional trails in the area. To ensure there is sufficient infrastructure to support traffic from the proposed development, several rezoning conditions are included in Attachment 1. For further information regarding traffic, please see Section C. Neighborhood Compatibility: The proposed development is located near two schools, between larger lot and smaller lot residential and adjacent to either proposed commercial or medium-density residential (Capella). Additionally, it is located along the La Cholla Boulevard corridor, which is experiencing growth due to the planned road widening project. To provide an effective transition between these various uses, the applicant proposes placing larger (approximately 16,000 sf) and fewer lots along the northern and eastern property lines, which effectively internalizes the smaller lots within the subdivision. For more information about compatibility and a full list of mitigation measures, please see Section C. Drainage: The property has two critical washes flowing in a southernly direction through the development. Through the use of detention basins, the proposed development will not increase pre-existing storm water run-off exiting the property and the drainage system will be designed to ensure that all proposed habitable structures adjacent to the wash will be protected from flooding and erosion. Grading: The proposed development will be mass graded and all code requirements for native plant preservation and mitigation will be met. 3. ESL Flexible Design Options Through the Environmentally Sensitive Lands (ESL) Ordinance, flexible design options are available to property owners when open space is applied to at least 25% or more of the property. The subject property has two ESL designations (for specifics, see Attachment 5) as well as numerous Saguaros onsite. The applicant is preserving 39% environmentally sensitive open space and therefore requesting the following flexible design options shown below in italics, followed by staff commentary.  Smaller building setbacks: Reduce the side setbacks from seven and a half (7.5’) feet to no less than five (5’) feet, and the front setbacks from twenty (20’) feet to no less than fifteen (15’) feet, provided that it does not result in an on-lot driveway less than twenty (20’) feet in length .  The proposed setback reductions is a reasonable request because it would allow a more varied and attractive streetscape, while maintaining a sufficient driveway length for on-lot parking. Lot size and width reductions: Reduce the minimum lot size from 7,000 square feet to 6,500 square feet, and the minimum lot width from 70 feet to 50 feet for the 103 of 178 lots.  In R1-7 zoning, this ESL incentive allows for a lot size reduction up to 5,500 square feet with a concomitant lot width reduction. The proposed lot reduction for 103 lots of the 178 lots is reasonable because it allows the proposed residential development to conserve more environmentally sensitive open space while maintaining an effective transition between uses. 4. General Plan Conformance  The applicant’s proposal has been reviewed for conformance with the Vision, Goals and Policies of the Your Voice Our Future General Plan. An analysis of notable goals and policies is included in Attachment 5.   C. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION On March 6, 2018, the Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC) considered this request and recommended denial (for meeting minutes see Attachment 4). Specific concerns from the Commission are shown below in italics, followed by staff commentary.   1. Increased traffic on Naranja Drive Concerns were expressed about Naranja Drive congestion in the morning and afternoon during the start and end of a typical Ironwood Ridge school day. Notable points are:  The main cause of congestion is the strong prevalence of westbound traffic for entry into the parking and drop-off/pick-up areas within the school campus. The congestion issue is compounded by the fact the school is located on the south side of Naranja Drive which forces most motorists to make left-turns into the campus. This results in a long back-up of vehicles, particularly during the morning peak periods. However, traffic is free-flowing during peak hours in the thru-lanes due to the Town widening Naranja Drive in 2015 to create a painted center median which doubles as a continuous left-turn lane for westbound vehicles entering the school. The purpose of the center lane is to free up the westbound through lane by providing a separate storage area for motorists waiting to enter the school from the east. The Naranja Drive improvements met the intended results as the westbound through lane from west of La Cholla Boulevard to Shannon Road is relatively free flowing during the morning and afternoon peak periods. The other main issue resulting from the heavy morning and afternoon traffic is the difficulty for motorists to turn left out of new or existing subdivisions along the south side of this segment of Naranja Drive. The easiest solution to alleviate this issue which is the result of westbound left-turning traffic essentially forming a solid barrier between west and eastbound lanes is to turn right and proceed to La Cholla Blvd.  For the proposed development of Saguaros Viejos, there are two important points to be noted:  Saguaros Viejos has two other access points to the public right-of-way. Future residents desiring to head south towards Tucson, north towards Tangerine Road or east towards Oracle Road will be able to get by utilizing the La Cholla Boulevard or Glover Road access drives. Other subdivisions along Naranja Drive also have secondary access drive connections such as The Estates at Cappella to La Cholla Boulevard and Saguaros Viejos West to Glover Road During all other times beyond the heavy morning and afternoon peak periods, Naranja Drive has relatively low in traffic volume and therefore provides a good level of service for motorists in any direction. 2. Timing of traffic improvements to Glover Road and La Cholla Boulevard Glover Road: Similar to Naranja Drive, Glover Road west of La Cholla Boulevard provides direct access to a school. As a result, the morning and afternoon peaks create area traffic congestion that lasts a relatively short duration. To mitigate for additional traffic, a rezoning condition (Attachment 1) is for the developer to widen Glover Road to incorporate through and multi-use lanes in each direction, a painted center median and a shared use path on the south side of the road. Timing of the Glover Road improvement is to coincide with development of Saguaros Viejos West (Phase 1) or Saguaros Viejos East (Phase 2, this project), whichever connects to Glover Road first. It should also be noted this segment of Glover Road is currently owned and operated by the Amphi School District. However, the developer will be dedicating right-of-way and working with the Amphi School District to dedicate their portion of right-of-way for the Town to take over this improved section of Glover Road once completed. After the Planning and Zoning Commission, this condition was refined and revised (Attachment 1) to reflect the extent and timing of the aforementioned improvements.  La Cholla Boulevard: Construction for the widening of La Cholla Boulevard to four lanes, as funded by the RTA, is anticipated to begin during the latter half of 2018. The roadway design already includes accommodations for the future Saguaros Viejos intersection, including a left-turn median opening for northbound traffic into the subdivision from La Cholla Boulevard. Completion of the La Cholla widening improvement project is expected to take approximately 2 years, which coincides well with the potential timing of this development. 3. Compatibility to existing homes east of the property The proposed subdivision is located between varying land uses and along the La Cholla Boulevard corridor, which is experiencing growth due to the planned widening of the road. Specifically, the subject property is:  Located near two schools, located to the north and south adjacent to either potential commercial or medium-density residential located on the northwest corner of La Cholla Boulevard and Naranja Drive. Proposes a zoning designation (R1-7) similar to the existing zoning designations established east (R1-10 and R1-7) and south of the property (R1-7). Fits within a wide array of varying lot sizes surrounding the property, which include:  North - Average lot size: 4.47 acres; ranging from 3.37 ac to 4.14 ac East - Average lot sizes: 1) La Cholla Ridge Estates = 8,150 sf; ranging from 7,770 sf to 12,997 sf;  2) Ironwood Ranch = 18,500 sf; ranging from 14,673 sf to 28,884 sf; and 3) Proposed Capella PAD = average lot size unknown & minimum size of 6,600 s.f -- or commercial use  West - Average lot size: 30,087 sf; ranging from 16,000 sf to 63,195 sf South - Average lot size: 7,898 sf; ranging from 6,546 sf to 13,266 sf To provide an effective transition between the varying uses surrounding the property, the applicant proposes the following measures:  Placing larger (approx.16,000 sf) and fewer lots along the northern and eastern property lines Internalizing smaller lots within the subdivision Using the existing La Cholla Boulevard right-of-way along the east property line as a 150'-plus wide buffer between the proposed development and existing homes Using the existing wash along the west property line as a 150’-plus wide natural buffer between the proposed development and future large lot subdivision (Saguaros Viejos Phase 1) D. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Summary of Public Notice Public notice has been provided:  Notification of all property owners within 600 feet and extended area Homeowners Association mailing Advertisement in The Daily Territorial newspaper Post on property Post at Town Hall and on website Neighborhood Meetings Two neighborhood meetings were held on March 22, 2017, and December 7, 2017, with approximately 18 and 3 residents, respectively. The main topics discussed at the meetings included access points, view preservation, building height, open space, land use transition, school capacity, and mass grading. A copy of the neighborhood meeting summary notes are included as Attachment 7. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission initially made a motion to approve the proposed rezoning. However, this motion failed as a tie vote. Upon which, staff encouraged the commission to make another motion to move the request to Town Council. This concluded with a recommendation for denial (for meeting minutes, see Attachment 4) passing 5-1. Denial was recommended due to specific concerns regarding traffic on Naranja Drive, timing of traffic improvements and compatibility to existing homes east of the property. These items are addressed in Section C of this staff report. As such, staff recommended approval during the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: The additional rooftops will help support existing and proposed commercial sites along the La Cholla Corridor. SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to APPROVE Ordinance No. (O)18-06, approving the Saguaros Viejos East Rezoning from R1-144 and R1-20 to R1-7, including the use of ESL’s Flexible Design Options, based on the finding that the request is consistent with the Zoning Code and the Your Voice Our Future General Plan, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1. OR   I MOVE to DENY Ordinance No. (O)18-06, approving the Saguaros Viejos East Rezoning from R1-144 and R1-20 to R1-7, based on the finding that the request is not consistent with the Zoning Code and/or Your Voice Our Future General Plan, specifically ____________________________________. Attachments ATTACHMENT 1 - ORDINANCE NO. (O)18-06  ATTACHMENT 2- APPLICANT'S REQUEST  ATTACHMENT 3- TENTATIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN  ATTACHMENT 4-PZC MEETING MINUTES 3.6.18  ATTACHMENT 5-PZC STAFF REPORT 3.6.18  ATTACHMENT 6- PREVIOUS APPROVALS  ATTACHMENT 7- NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING SUMMARIES  ORDINANCE NO. (O)18-06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, APPROVING A REZONING REQUEST BY PAUL OLAND OF WLB GROUP, INC, FOR AN 85.2 ACRE PROPERTY LOCATED NEAR THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF NARANJA DRIVE AND LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD FROM R1-20 AND R1-144 TO R1-7 WHEREAS, Paul Oland of WLB Group, Inc., (the “Applicant”), applied for a rezoning from R1-20 and R1-144 to R1-7 for an 85.2 acre property located near the northwest corner of Naranja Drive and La Cholla Boulevard, as depicted on Exhibit “A” attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the Applicant wishes to change the zoning to R1-7 to develop a 178 lot single-family residential subdivision; and WHEREAS, the Application also requests two flexible design options enabled by the Environmentally Sensitive Lands regulations: 1) smaller building setbacks 2) reduced lot size and width; and WHEREAS, the Applicant’s request for rezoning complies with the OVZCR; and WHEREAS, the Applicant's request for rezoning complies with the applicable Your Voice Our Future General Plan requirements; and WHEREAS, on March 6, 2018, the Planning & Zoning Commission recommended denial for rezoning the property from R1-144 to R1-43 and three flexible design options with conditions due to concerns about traffic on Naranja Drive, timing of traffic improvements to Glover and La Cholla Boulevard and compatibility to existing homes east of the property; and WHEREAS, the Town Council has duly considered the Applicant’s request for rezoning of for an 85.2 acre property located near the northwest corner of Naranja Drive and La Cholla Boulevard. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona that the rezoning requested by Paul Oland of WLB Group, Inc., (the “Applicant”), applied for a rezoning and requested flexible design options for an 85.2 acre property located near the northwest corner of Naranja Drive and La Cholla Boulevard is hereby approved with conditions attached hereto as Exhibit “B”. NOW THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that: 1.All Oro Valley ordinances, resolutions or motions and parts of ordinances, resolutions or motions of the Council in conflict with the provision of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. 2.If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona on this 4 th day ofApril, 2018. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Dr. Satish I. Hiremath, Mayor ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM : Michael Standish, Town Clerk Tobin Sidles, Legal Services Director Date: Date: EXHIBIT “A” MAP OF PROPERTY EXHIBIT “B” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Revisions made after the Planning and Zoning Commission, which add further details but do not change the intent of the conditions, are shown below. Deletions shown with strikethroughs and additions shown in ALL CAPS. 1. All saguaros shown on the Tentative Development Plan shall be preserved-in-place. To ensure preservation of these saguaros, the applicant must adjust lot lines accordingly as part of the Final Site Plan review process 2. This development shall contribute its fair share of costs in BE RESPONSIBLE FOR the reconstruction of Glover Road TO INCLUDE A PAINTED MEDIAN, BIKE LANES ON BOTH SIDES AND A SHARED USE PATH ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE ROAD. TIMING OF THE IMPROVEMENT IS TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE AMPHITHEATER SCHOOL DISTRICT AND IS TO COINCIDE WITH DEVELOPMENT OF SAGUAROS VIEJOS WEST (PHASE 1) OR SAGUAROS VIEJOS EAST (PHASE 2, THIS PROJECT), WHICHEVER CONNECTS TO GLOVER ROAD FIRST. The Town will not participate in the reconstruction cost of Glover Road. 3. This project shall coordinate with both the Town of Oro Valley and Amphitheater School District in the planning and design of the Glover Road reconstruction. 4. This development shall dedicate 50 feet of right-of-way on Glover Road; this includes the portion of parcel 224-11-037B that has been identified as excluded from this rezoning. Said dedication shall extend to the La Cholla Boulevard western right-of-way boundary. 5. A shared use path on the south side of Glover Road shall be constructed as a part of the street reconstruction and dedication. 6. The Water Utility Department has requested the following items be required: a. Extend the twelve (12”) inch “E” Zone main across La Cholla Boulevard on Glover Road to the property's western boundary. b. Extend the twelve (12”) inch “E” Zone main in the south right-of-way of Glover Road west to the property's Western boundary. c. Connect the above mentioned mains with eight (8”) inch mains through the development. SAGUAROS VIEJOS PHASE II REZONING SITE ANALYSIS OV1701685 10.11.2017 Revised 02.13.2018 PREPARED FOR: Lin Chun-Ying Frank 6088 W Arizona Pavilions Dr. Suite 1 Tucson, Arizona 85743 PREPARED BY: The WLB Group, Inc. Attn: Paul Oland 4444 East Broadway Tucson, Arizona 85711 WLB No. 199032-B-004 February 13, 2018 Q:\199032\B -004 Saguaros Viejos Ph. 2 Eastside\01 Planning\04 Rezone or GPA\Saguaros Viejos Rezoning Site Analysis.docx Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 i CONTENTS Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 Part I – Inventory & Analysis ............................................................................................................ 3 1. Existing Land Uses ........................................................................................................................................ 5 A. Regional Context .................................................................................................................................................. 5 B. Onsite Uses .......................................................................................................................................................... 5 C. Project Vicinity ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 c: Number of Stories of Surrounding Structures ..................................................................................................... 6 2. Environmentally Sensitive Lands .................................................................................................................. 6 A. ESL Categories Onsite .......................................................................................................................................... 6 B. Additional ESL Characteristics .............................................................................................................................. 7 C. Total acreage present on-site for each Conservation Category. .......................................................................... 7 3. Topography .................................................................................................................................................. 7 A. Topographic Character & Features ...................................................................................................................... 7 4. Cultural / Archaeological / Historic Resources .............................................................................................. 8 A. Archaeological Survey Status / Results ................................................................................................................ 8 5. Hydrology .................................................................................................................................................. 10 A. Offsite Watersheds ............................................................................................................................................ 10 B. Balanced / Critical Basins ................................................................................................................................... 10 C. Offsite Features Affecting or Affected by the Property ..................................................................................... 10 D. Area of Upstream Watersheds Greater than 100 CFS ....................................................................................... 10 E. Location / Ownership of Well Sites within 100’ of Site ...................................................................................... 10 F. Onsite Hydrology Characteristics ....................................................................................................................... 10 G. Existing Drainage Conditions along the Downstream Property Boundary ......................................................... 11 6. Wildlife ...................................................................................................................................................... 12 A. Arizona Game & Fish Dept. Letter ..................................................................................................................... 12 7. Viewsheds .................................................................................................................................................. 23 8. Traffic......................................................................................................................................................... 24 A. Connection to Arterial Roadway Network ......................................................................................................... 24 B. Arterial Roadways within One Mile of the Property .......................................................................................... 24 9. Recreation / Trails ...................................................................................................................................... 26 A. Trails, Parks and Recreation Areas within One Mile of the Property ................................................................. 26 Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 ii 10. Schools ....................................................................................................................................................... 27 A. Schools within One Mile of the Property ........................................................................................................... 27 B. Schools Expected to Serve the Project ............................................................................................................... 27 11. Water ......................................................................................................................................................... 28 A. Water Service Provider ...................................................................................................................................... 28 12. Wastewater ............................................................................................................................................... 29 A. Sewer Service Connection ................................................................................................................................. 29 13. Exhibits ...................................................................................................................................................... 30 Exhibit I-1-A: Site Location Map................................................................................................................... 31 Exhibit I-1-B: Aerial Photograph .................................................................................................................. 32 Exhibit I-1-C: Existing General Plan Future Land Use Designations .............................................................. 33 Exhibit I-1-D: Existing Zoning ....................................................................................................................... 34 Exhibit I-1-E: Existing Land Uses .................................................................................................................. 35 Exhibit I-2-A: Environmentally Sensitive Lands ............................................................................................ 36 Exhibit I-3-A: Topography ............................................................................................................................ 37 Exhibit I-5-A: Offsite Watersheds ................................................................................................................. 38 Exhibit I-5-B: Onsite Hydrology Characteristics............................................................................................ 39 Exhibit I-8-A: Transportation ....................................................................................................................... 40 Exhibit I-9-A: Trails, Parks & Recreation ...................................................................................................... 41 Exhibit I-10-A: Existing & Proposed Schools ................................................................................................. 42 Exhibit I-12-A: Sewer Service ....................................................................................................................... 43 Exhibit I-13-A: McHarg Composite Map ...................................................................................................... 44 Part II – Land Use Plan ................................................................................................................... 45 1. Land Uses ................................................................................................................................................... 47 A. Project Description ............................................................................................................................................ 47 B. General Plan Conformance ................................................................................................................................ 47 C. Flexible Design Options / Conservation Subdivision Design ............................................................................... 47 D. Effect on Existing Land Uses .............................................................................................................................. 48 2. Environmentally Sensitive Lands ................................................................................................................ 49 A. ESOS Selection & Preservation Methods ........................................................................................................... 49 3. Topography ................................................................................................................................................ 50 A. Design Response to Site Topography ................................................................................................................. 50 B. Slope Encroachment .......................................................................................................................................... 50 C. Hillside Conservation Areas ............................................................................................................................... 50 Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 iii D. Quantified Site Disturbance ............................................................................................................................... 50 4. Cultural / Archaeological / Historic Resources ............................................................................................ 51 A. Resource Protection .......................................................................................................................................... 51 B. Treatment Plan .................................................................................................................................................. 51 5. Hydrology .................................................................................................................................................. 52 A. Design Response to Site Hydrology/Modification of Drainage Patterns/Mitigation .......................................... 52 D. Town Policy Conformance ................................................................................................................................. 52 6. Wildlife ...................................................................................................................................................... 53 A. Mitigation .......................................................................................................................................................... 53 7. Viewsheds .................................................................................................................................................. 54 A. Design Response to Site Viewsheds ................................................................................................................... 54 B. ORSCOD / TRCOD Conformance ........................................................................................................................ 54 8. Traffic......................................................................................................................................................... 55 A. Traffic Impact Analysis ....................................................................................................................................... 55 B. Proposed Rights-of-Way .................................................................................................................................... 57 C. Proposed Pedestrian / Bicycle Circulation ......................................................................................................... 57 9. Recreation / Trails ...................................................................................................................................... 58 A. Offsite Trail Access ............................................................................................................................................. 58 B. Open Space Ownership ...................................................................................................................................... 58 10. Schools ....................................................................................................................................................... 59 A. Student Generation ........................................................................................................................................... 59 B. School Capacity .................................................................................................................................................. 59 11. Water ......................................................................................................................................................... 62 A. Water Demand .................................................................................................................................................. 62 B. Water Service Provider & Capacity .................................................................................................................... 62 12. Wastewater ............................................................................................................................................... 65 A. Sewer Service Method ....................................................................................................................................... 65 13. Bufferyards ................................................................................................................................................ 67 A. Mitigation .......................................................................................................................................................... 67 14. Exhibits ...................................................................................................................................................... 68 Exhibit II-1-A: Tentative Development Plan ................................................................................................. 69 Exhibit II-2-A: Proposed Zoning .................................................................................................................... 70 Exhibit II-3-A: Proposed ESOS Map .............................................................................................................. 71 Exhibit II-4-A: Proposed Grading Limits ....................................................................................................... 72     Saguaros Viejos Phase II ‐ Rezoning Site Analysis  WLB No. 199032‐B‐004 iv           (This page intentionally blank)    Introduction Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 1 Introduction Saguaros Viejos Phase II is a proposed 85.2± acre neighborhood consisting of medium density residential lots, landscaped common areas, a recreational area, and natural open space. This project (Phase II) is part of the overall Saguaros Viejos project which includes Phase I, a subdivision consisting of larger sized lots. Currently, the Phase II subject property remains undeveloped. The Saguaros Viejos project will provide reasonable residential density while at the same time preserve the most environmentally sensitive portions of the site. This request is to rezone the property from R1-20 to R1-7. The proposed rezoning is supported by several factors, including its proximity to existing medium density residential developments, proximity to schools, compatibility with surrounding residential land uses, and adjacency to significant roadways. The anticipated overall gross density of Saguaros Viejos is approximately 2.1 dwelling units per acre, which is similar to existing neighborhoods adjacent to the project area. A density transition to existing residences to the west will be provided by the larger lot subdivision in Saguaros Viejos Phase I. Additionally, larger lots are planned on the north and east edges of the project site to provide a buffer near existing residences. Saguaros Viejos will meet Town requirements and set aside sensitive natural desert areas on-site, specifically, lands within and near washes identified as Critical Resource Areas in the Town of Oro Valley Environmentally Sensitive Lands Ordinance (ESL). In order to make this project a reality, the appropriate land entitlements must be acquired for the property. This request to rezone the property from R1-20 to R1-7 will allow the appropriate density, provide a generous amount of open space and comply with the Oro Valley Environmentally Sensitive Lands Ordinance. Introduction Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 2 (This page intentionally blank) Part I – Inventory & Analysis Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 3 Part I – Inventory & Analysis Part I – Inventory & Analysis Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 4 (This page intentionally blank) Part I – Inventory & Analysis Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 5 1. Existing Land Uses A. Regional Context The subject property consists of approximately 85.2± acres located in the southeast quarter of Section 4, Township 12 South, Range 13 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Town of Oro Valley, Pima County, Arizona. The subject property is located northwest of the intersection of Naranja Drive and La Cholla Boulevard. Please refer to Exhibit I-1-A: Site Location Map and Exhibit I-1-B: Aerial Photograph. B. Onsite Uses The subject property is currently vacant. Two tributaries of the Cañada del Oro wash flow through the property from the north to the south and join the wash approximately 1.5 miles south of the subject property. The subject property is zoned R1-20 “Single-Family Residential District”. The Oro Valley Zoning Code defines this district as one that “provides for low-density detached single-family residential development”. The minimum lot size in this district is 20,000 square feet (0.5 acres). The Town of Oro Valley General Plan, Your Voice Our Future, adopted in 2016, designates the property as Medium Density Residential (MDR) and allows for 2.1-5.0 dwelling units per acre, as did the previous General Plan. Please refer to Exhibit I-1-C: Existing General Plan Future Land Use Designations. C. Project Vicinity Please refer to Exhibit I-1-D: Existing Zoning and Exhibit I-1-E: Existing Land Uses. The subject property is surrounded by the following existing zonings and land uses: a/b: Existing Zoning and Land Uses North: Existing zoning: R1-144 & R1-7 (Single Family District). Existing land use: Glover Road, Richard B. Wilson K-8 Elementary School, Rancho de Plata (50-lot residential subdivision with a minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet), and unplanned residential development with lot sizes of 3.3 acres or more. East: Existing zoning: R1-10 & R1-7 (Single Family Residential Districts). Existing land use: La Cholla Boulevard, Ironwood Ranch (65-lot residential subdivision with a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet) and La Cholla Estates (94-lot residential subdivision with a minimum lot size of 7,000 square feet). South-East: Existing zoning: PAD (Planned Area Development) Open Space (Open Space –PAD) Existing land use: Catalina at Canada Hills (61-lot residential subdivision with a minimum lot size of 6,820 square feet). Part I – Inventory & Analysis Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 6 South: Existing zoning: R1-144, & R1-7 (Single Family District). Existing land use: Naranja Drive, the Estates at Capella subdivision (120 lot residential with a minimum lot size of 6,500 square feet) West: Existing zoning: R1-144 (Single Family District). Existing land use: Unregulated residential development with lot sizes of 3.3 acres or more. c: Number of Stories of Surrounding Structures Excluding the schools, adjacent structures within one-quarter mile of the subject property are all single-story or two-story single-family detached residential units. The Wilson K-8 and Ironwood Ridge High School campuses both include massive structures. d: Pending Rezonings The 207+/- acre Capella property to the south of the subject property is pending a rezoning to Planned Area Development which will allow for the development of condominiums, town homes, and detached single-family homes, and a variety of commercial uses. e: Conditionally Approved Zonings There are no conditionally approved zonings within a quarter mile of the subject property. f: Subdivisions and/or Development Plans Approved The Estates at Capella subdivision, directly south of the subject property was recently approved. g: Architectural Styles Used in Adjacent Projects Homes within the platted subdivisions adjacent to the subject property generally incorporate contemporary southwestern architecture. Homes in areas of unplanned development follow a variety of architectural styles. 2. Environmentally Sensitive Lands A. ESL Categories Onsite The subject property consists of two Environmentally Sensitive Land categories. Approximately 80% or 68.1± acres of the property is within the Resource Management Area Tier 2. Approximately 20% or 17.1± acres is within the Critical Resource Area which is located along the washes on the periphery of the subject property. The vegetation community on the property is typical of the Sonoran Desertscrub Paloverde- Mixed Cacti, which includes Palo Verde, Mesquite, Cholla, Prickly pear, Ocotillo, and Barrel Cactus. Part I – Inventory & Analysis Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 7 B. Additional ESL Characteristics No regulated rock outcrops occur on site. Please refer to Exhibit I-2-A: Environmentally Sensitive Lands. C. Total acreage present on-site for each Conservation Category. Conservation Category Acreage Major Wildlife Linkage 0 Critical Resource Area 17.1± Core Resource Area 0 RMA Tier 1 0± RMA Tier 2 68.1± RMA Tier 3 0 3. Topography A. Topographic Character & Features The subject property slopes downward from north to south toward Naranja Drive. Slopes less than 5% characterize the vast majority of the subject property with elevations ranging from approximately 2,680 feet at the lowest point on the south side of the subject property to 2,741 feet at the highest point on the north side of the subject property. Several braided washes traverse the site. The site contains no regulated slopes. The site does not contain any restricted peaks/ridges, or rock outcrops. No areas of this development are subject to the Hillside Development Zone, Section 24.2 of the Town of Oro Valley Zoning Code. Please refer to Exhibit I-3-A: Topography. Topographic Feature Category Acreage 15% to less than 18% 0 18% to less than 20% 0 20% to less than 25% 0 25% to less than 33% 0 33% or greater 0 Ridgelines 0 Rock Outcrops & Boulders 0 Part I – Inventory & Analysis Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 8 4. Cultural / Archaeological / Historic Resources A. Archaeological Survey Status / Results i. The entire project site has been surveyed for archaeological resources (see Archaeological Survey of the La Cholla/Glover SWC Project near Oro Valley, Pima County, Arizona 2009. ii. No archaeological or historical sites have been recorded on the property. iii. There remains a possibility that ground-disturbing activities could reveal presence of undiscovered cultural resources. If any human remains or funerary objects are discovered during the construction of this project, all work will stop within the area of the remains. Part I – Inventory & Analysis Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 9 Cover Page of Archaeological Survey Part I – Inventory & Analysis Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 10 5. Hydrology A. Offsite Watersheds The site is located in the La Cañada del Oro watershed, which has a 100-year peak discharge of approximately 28,000 cfs at the confluence with the Santa Cruz River. The Cañada del Oro Wash is located south of the project site and flows west to the Santa Cruz River. Please refer to Exhibit I-5-A: Offsite Watersheds. B. Balanced / Critical Basins Per Town decree, the entire Town is classified as a critical basin. C. Offsite Features Affecting or Affected by the Property There are several box culverts located beneath Glover Road. There is also a detention basin with a storm drain along the southern portion of the existing Richard B. Wilson Elementary K-8 School. Also, the adjacent Ironwood Ranch subdivision collects and redirects sheet flow from the previously mentioned watershed and washes through culverts and engineered channels throughout the subdivision. Base flood elevations have not been established by FEMA. D. Area of Upstream Watersheds Greater than 100 CFS There are a total of four separate offsite watersheds discharging 100-year discharges greater than 100 cfs onto the project. The offsite watersheds range in size from 9.7 acres to 252 acres. The minor watersheds that impact the proposed site are a combination of the areas located on the east end of the property boundary and the immediate area. Please refer to Exhibit I-5-B: Onsite Hydrology Characteristics. E. Location / Ownership of Well Sites within 100’ of Site According to the Arizona Department of Water Resources, there are no wells located within 100 feet of the project site. F. Onsite Hydrology Characteristics Please refer to Exhibit I-5-B: Onsite Hydrology Characteristics i. Approximate 100-year floodplains with discharges equal to or greater than 50 cfs. No portions of the project site have been designated Zone A by FEMA but rather a Zone X. The onsite depths and velocities were not determined for this analysis without revised studies of all natural channels greater than or equal to 50 cfs. Base flood elevations have not been established by FEMA. Part I – Inventory & Analysis Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 11 ii. Areas of sheet flooding, with average depths Average sheet flow depth was not determined for this analysis. All stormwater flows are collected in numerous braided, meandering confined natural channels and directed south through the project site. iii. Federally mapped floodways and floodplains The site is not located within a FEMA floodplain per Arizona Flood Insurance Rate map community Panel Number 04019C1070L effective date June 16, 2011. There are no designated floodways onsite. iv. Calculation of all 100-year peak discharges exceeding 50 cfs Onsite discharges are insignificant compared to the offsite flow volumes. While the local drainage and conveyance will be addressed in the final drainage report, the offsite drainage and conveyance remain the dominant flows. G. Existing Drainage Conditions along the Downstream Property Boundary Naranja Drive forms the downstream property boundary. Naranja Drive has recently been improved by the Town to add traffic capacity and also to address historic flooding and sedimentation problems that used to exist in several locations. Part I – Inventory & Analysis Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 12 6. Wildlife A. Arizona Game & Fish Dept. Letter Part I – Inventory & Analysis Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 13 Arizona Game & Fish Dept. Letter (cont’d) Part I – Inventory & Analysis Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 14 Arizona Game & Fish Dept. Letter (cont’d) Part I – Inventory & Analysis Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 15 Arizona Game & Fish Dept. Letter (cont’d) Part I – Inventory & Analysis Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 16 Arizona Game & Fish Dept. Letter (cont’d) Part I – Inventory & Analysis Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 17 Arizona Game & Fish Dept. Letter (cont’d) Part I – Inventory & Analysis Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 18 Arizona Game & Fish Dept. Letter (cont’d) Part I – Inventory & Analysis Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 19 Arizona Game & Fish Dept. Letter (cont’d) Part I – Inventory & Analysis Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 20 Arizona Game & Fish Dept. Letter (cont’d) Part I – Inventory & Analysis Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 21 Arizona Game & Fish Dept. Letter (cont’d) Part I – Inventory & Analysis Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 22 Arizona Game & Fish Dept. Letter (cont’d) Part I – Inventory & Analysis Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 23 7. Viewsheds Due to the relatively flat character of the project site, the perimeter areas are the only locations of high visibility from adjacent roadways and properties. The areas of higher vegetation densities in and near the site perimeter further reduce visibility into and across the property. A. For proposals within the Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District and/or Oracle Road Scenic Corridor Overlay District, provide a Viewshed Analysis as defined in Section 27.10.D.3.f.iv.a.1. The subject property is not within the Oracle Road Scenic Corridor Overlay District, and is not within the target area of the Tangerine Corridor Overlay District. B. For proposals within the Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District and/or Oracle Road Scenic Corridor Overlay District, provide a View Preservation Plan (VPP) for nonresidential developments that meet the criteria defined in Section 27.10.D.3.f.iv.2. Not Applicable C. For proposals within the Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District and/or Oracle Road Scenic Corridor Overlay District, map and identify all Core Character Vegetation (CCV), in accordance with Section 27.10.D.3.f.iv.b. Not Applicable Part I – Inventory & Analysis Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 24 8. Traffic A. Connection to Arterial Roadway Network Access to the subject property will be from Glover Road, Naranja Drive and La Cholla Boulevard. The access on Glover Road will be aligned with a driveway, 600 feet west of the intersection of Glover Road and La Cholla Boulevard. In its current condition, Glover Road is a private street that is partially owned by Amphitheater School District. The connection on Naranja Drive will be aligned with an existing curb cut located adjacent from the Estates at Capella subdivisions’ main access point, approximately one quarter mile west of the intersection of Naranja Drive and La Cholla Boulevard. The connection on La Cholla Boulevard is shown on the site plan to be approximately 680 feet north of Arizona Rose Drive, a residential street on the east side of La Cholla Boulevard. B. Arterial Roadways within One Mile of the Property i. Existing and proposed right-of-way widths. See tables below. ii. Whether or not said widths conform to Oro Valley minimum requirements. Naranja Drive was recently improved and meets Oro Valley requirements. Both La Cholla Boulevard and Tangerine Road will be improved to four-lane arterials and will meet Oro Valley requirements. iii. Ownership (public or private). The arterial roadways are public roads in Oro Valley iv. Whether or not rights-of-way jog or are continuous. Rights-of-way are generally continuous within the one-mile area. v. Number of travel lanes, theoretical capacity and design speed for existing streets. See tables below. vi. Present Average Daily Traffic (ADT) for existing streets. See tables below. vii. Describe surface conditions on existing streets providing access to the site. With the roadway improvement projects on La Cholla Boulevard and Tangerine Road and with the recent widening of Naranja Drive, the surface conditions of the roadways are, or will be very good. viii. Program for completion of roadway and intersection improvements. See tables below. La Cholla Boulevard Road Segment: Naranja Dr. to Tangerine Rd. Naranja Dr. to Lambert Lane Existing ROW: 150’ 60’ Ultimate ROW: 150’ 150’ Travel Lanes: 2 2 Capacity: 15,900 15,900 ADT (PAG): 7,757 6,078 Speed Limit: 45 45 Condition: Paved Paved Scheduled Improvements: Scheduled Scheduled Naranja Drive Road Segment: Shannon to La Cholla La Cholla Blvd. to La Canada Existing ROW: 150’ 150’ Ultimate ROW: 150’ 150' Travel Lanes: 2 2 Capacity: 16,000 16,000 ADT (PAG): 4,734 6,511 Speed Limit: 35 45 Part I – Inventory & Analysis Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 25 Condition: Paved Paved Scheduled Improvements: None Scheduled None Scheduled Tangerine Road Road Segment: La Cholla to La Canada Thornydale to La Cholla Existing ROW: 200’ 200’ Ultimate ROW: 200’ 200’ Travel Lanes: 2 2 Capacity: 15,900 15,900 ADT (PAG): 14,637 14,444 Speed Limit: 45 45 Condition: Paved Paved Scheduled Improvements: In Progress In Progress Please refer to Exhibit I-8-A: Transportation. ix. Existing and proposed intersections on arterials within 1 mile of the site most likely to be used by traffic from the site. Arterial intersections within one mile of the site that will likely carry traffic generated by this development include Naranja Drive and La Cholla Boulevard, Naranja Drive and La Cañada Drive, Tangerine Road and La Cholla Boulevard, Lambert Lane and La Cholla Boulevard, and Naranja and Shannon Road. x. Existing bicycle and pedestrian ways adjacent to the site and their connections with arterial streets, parks and schools. According to the Oro Valley Bikeways Map 2016 there are bike paths along Naranja Drive, La Cholla and Glover Road, which are classified as follows: • Naranja Drive (shared use path and signed bike route w/ on-street bike lane) • La Cholla Boulevard (shared use path and signed bike route w/ on-street bike lane) • Glover Road (shared use path and signed bike route w/ on-street bike lane) A paved shoulder on the south side of Glover Road is striped for a bike lane, which provides a connection with the Richard B. Wilson Elementary and Middle School. A shared-use path parallels Glover Road on the south side of the road and is separated from Glover Road by a raised curb. The Naranja Drive bike path provides connection with the Ironwood Ridge High School. The Naranja Drive bike path eventually connects with the shared use path and signed bike route with on-street bike lane along La Cañada Drive. At that point, it changes to a paved shoulder bike path as it continues east. La Cholla Boulevard on-street bike route and shared use path provides north-south connectivity along the eastern edge of the subject property. At this moment, bike paths do not provide any direct connectivity to an existing park. Refer to Exhibit I-8-A: Transportation. Part I – Inventory & Analysis Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 26 9. Recreation / Trails A. Trails, Parks and Recreation Areas within One Mile of the Property West Lambert Lane Park is located approximately three-quarters of a mile southeast of the subject property on the north side of Lambert Lane and approximately one-quarter mile west of La Cañada Drive. This park features access to a natural surface trail. This is the only park located within one mile of the subject property. Trail #33 is a primary trail that travels in a north-south fashion along the eastern boundary of the subject property, within one-quarter mile east of the Richard B. Wilson K-8 Elementary School to the north and through the Casas Christian School to the south, according to the Revised Oro Valley Trails Map, 2010. Trail #325 is approximately one-mile east of the subject property and travels in a southwest-northeast fashion, starting at the Verde Ranch residential subdivision, through the Vistoso Gateway residential subdivision, and ending at Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 10. The subject property is also bordered by completed shared uses paths located on Naranja Drive, La Cholla Boulevard and Glover Road. West Lambert Lane Park consists of approximately 40 acres of active and passive recreational activities. There are no known current or proposed trail rights-of-way located on site. Surrounding Recreation Areas Park Name: Park Size (in Acres) Park Type (Active of Passive) West Lambert Lane Park 1.2± Passive Refer to Exhibit I-9-A: Trails, Parks & Recreation. Part I – Inventory & Analysis Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 27 10. Schools A. Schools within One Mile of the Property Ironwood Ridge High School is located southwest of the subject property. Wilson K-8 School is located just north of the subject property. Casas Christian School neighbors the subject property to the south. Refer to Exhibit I-10-A: Existing & Proposed Schools. B. Schools Expected to Serve the Project The subject property is located within the Amphitheater Public Schools District. Existing schools in the District that may serve the subject property include: • Richard B. Wilson Elementary School is located north of the subject property and Glover Road. This school accommodates kindergarten through eighth grades. • Ironwood Ridge High School is located south of the subject property and Naranja Drive. • Casas Christian School is located to the south of the subject property. This private school accommodates kindergarten through 8th grades. • Basis Oro Valley located three miles east. The school accommodates kindergarten through 12th grades. Part I – Inventory & Analysis Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 28 11. Water A. Water Service Provider The Town of Oro Valley Water Utility has availability and will service the subject property under the following conditions: • A water Plan is submitted by the applicant and approved by the Water Utility. • A Line Extension Agreement is executed by the applicant. • All construction is in accordance with the approved Water Plan and the new facilities are in accordance with the requirements of the Line Extension Agreement. • Payment of all water development impact fees, meter fees and other required fees and charges. (A water meter for residential and/or commercial use cannot be sold until after the issuance of an approved building permit). • All conditions of Ordinance NO. (O) 07-38 as they pertain to Public Water infrastructure will be followed. The exact nature of offsite improvements will be determined during the platting process, but the developer shall be fiscally and financially responsible for all water system improvements and modifying/enhancing the existing water system to meet those needs. Contact information: Mark Moore – Oro Valley Water Utility, 11000 N. La Canada Drive, Oro Valley AZ 85737. Part I – Inventory & Analysis Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 29 12. Wastewater A. Sewer Service Connection An 8-inch PVC sewer pipe transects the subject property at center from north to south. This 8-inch sewer pipe connects to a 12-inch PVC sewer pipe along Naranja Drive as it exits the subject property. Capacity is currently available for this project in the public sewer G-90-033, downstream from manhole 5249-38. Refer to Exhibit I-12-A: Sewer Service.       Part I – Inventory & Analysis    Saguaros Viejos Phase II ‐ Rezoning Site Analysis  WLB No. 199032‐B‐004 30 13. Exhibits    MOORE RD. TANGERINE RD.LA CHOLLA BLVD.LA CANADA DR.GLOVER RD. NARANJA DR.Q:\199032\B-004 Saguaros Viejos Ph. 2 Eastside\01 Planning\04 Rezone or GPA\Site Analysis\Exhibits\Exh 1-5-A - Offsite Watershed.dwg Plotted: Jun. 29, 20171/3 Mile Inc. Group The WLB 0' 38 Exhibit I-5-A Offsite Watershed LEGEND: SUBJECT PROPERTY OFFSITE WATERSHED (476± ACRES) Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 GLOVER RD.LA CHOLLA BLVD.NARANJA DR. 2720 2720 2695270026902725 2685269 5 2725 2715 2705271 0 2 7 1 5 2705 269027002730 27 3 0 273 5 OS1 OS2 OS3 OS4 5.1E2710 2740 273 5 5E2E Q:\199032\B-004 Saguaros Viejos Ph. 2 Eastside\01 Planning\04 Rezone or GPA\Site Analysis\Exhibits\Exh 1-5-B - Onsite Hydro.dwg Plotted: Oct. 10, 2017400' Inc. Group The WLB 0' 39 Exhibit I-5-B Onsite Hydrology Characteristics LEGEND: ESTIMATED 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN EROSION HAZARD SETBACK CONCENTRATION POINT Contour Interval = 5 Ft. Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 CONC. POINT (CFS) 100-YEAR 426 185 656 628 OS1 OS2 OS3 OS4 PRE-DEVELOPED STORMWATER DISCHARGE RATES 4492E 5915E 1385.1EOS1 SHANNON RD.LA CANADA DR.LA CHOLLA BLVD.1 MILE FROM PROJECT SITE GLOVER RD. NARANJA DR. CANADA HILLS D R . TANGERINE RD. LAMBERT LANE IRONWOOD RIDGE HIGH SCHOOL CASAS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL WILSON K-8 Q:\199032\B-004 Saguaros Viejos Ph. 2 Eastside\01 Planning\04 Rezone or GPA\Site Analysis\Exhibits\Exh 1-10-A - Schools.dwg Plotted: Sep. 26, 20171/3 Mile Inc. Group The WLB 0' 42 Exhibit I-10-A Schools Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 GLOVER RD.LA CHOLLA BLVD.NARANJA DR. 2720 2720 26952700269027102725 26852695 2725 2715 27052710 2 7 1 5 270 5 269027002730 2740 27 3 0 273 5 273 5 Q:\199032\B-004 Saguaros Viejos Ph. 2 Eastside\01 Planning\04 Rezone or GPA\Site Analysis\Exhibits\Exh 1-13-A - Composite Map.dwg Plotted: Feb. 12, 2018400' Inc. Group The WLB 0' 44 Exhibit I-13-A McHarg Composite Map Contour Interval = 1 Ft. LEGEND: CRITICAL RESOURCE AREA RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AREA TIER 2 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AREA TIER 1 EXISTING MEDIUM DENSITY VEGETATION SAGUARO >24' w/ 2+ ARMS, OR CRESTED SAGUARO APPROXIMATE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN GENERAL FLOW DIRECTION Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 Part II – Land Use Plan Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 45 Part II – Land Use Plan Part II – Land Use Plan Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 46 (This page intentionally blank) Part II – Land Use Plan Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 47 1. Land Uses A. Project Description This project proposes to rezone the subject property from R1-20 to R1-7. This would allow for a residential subdivision with a density of 2.1 dwelling units per acre, consisting of 178 single-family detached homes on 85.2±-acres. All 178 homes will be semi-custom site built one or two-story homes with a 25-foot maximum height. All of the lots will have a minimum size of 50’ x 130’ (6,500 sq. ft.) to 55’x130’ (7,150 sq. ft.) though the home sizes will vary. Larger transitional lot sizes are proposed along the northern and eastern edges of the project. The architectural design of these homes will be consistent with surrounding residential developments and will adhere to Town of Oro Valley Design Guidelines. They will be constructed out of materials such as stucco, adobe, and wood frame, and will have either a gabled, tiled or flat roof. Perimeter walls will meet the Oro Valley Design Guidelines, and landscape treatments and design will be similar to the existing landscapes of the surrounding neighborhoods. Refer to Exhibit II-1-A: Conceptual Land Use Plan. B. General Plan Conformance The proposed residential neighborhood provides for open space conservation, protection of sensitive environmental areas and encourages medium density residential development in accordance with Town requirements. The subject property conforms to the existing General Plan designation of Medium Density Residential (MDR) which allows for a maximum residential density of 5 dwellings per acre. The overall gross density of the proposed community at 2.1 dwellings per acre will serve as a transition between the existing higher densities of neighboring communities to the east and lower densities west of the project. This project also known as Phase II relies on the previously approved Phase I, which serves as additional density transition to the west. C. Flexible Design Options / Conservation Subdivision Design As part of this rezoning application, the subject property seeks to utilize some of the Flexible Development provisions available as part of the sites participation in the Environmentally Sensitive Lands Ordinance (ESLO) (Section 27.10.F.2.c). ESL Incentives Request: ZONING INCENTIVES (Section 27.10(F)(2)(C)(III) ✔ (a) Building Setbacks -- (b) Landscape Buffer Yards ✔ ✔ (c) Minimum Lot Size (d)Minimum Lot Width -- (e) Off-street Parking -- (f) Building Height -- (g) Open Space -- (h) Mixed Use -- (i) Modified Review Process ✔ (j) Recreation Area Credit -- (k) Native Vegetation Preservation      Part II – Land Use Plan    Saguaros Viejos Phase II ‐ Rezoning Site Analysis  WLB No. 199032‐B‐004 48   Section 27.10.(F)(2)(b) – Applicability   i. The following design options may be applied to property or portions of property when ESOS  is applied to twenty‐five (25%) or more of a project site, except as provided herein.      ESOS Total for site = 39%  (a) Building Setbacks: Per Section 27.10(F)(2)(b) – Applicability, and the use of a Conservation Subdivision  Design for a reduced minimum lot size of no less than 6,500 square feet, we request that the side  setbacks be reduced to no less than five (5) feet, front setbacks shall be reduced to no less than fifteen  (15) feet for the use of side entry garages and non‐garage building elements only, and the rear setbacks  be reduced to twenty (20) feet – consistent with zoning distric ts with comparable lot sizes.  This request  will not result in an on‐lot driveway length of less than twenty (20) feet. This request will allow for a  residential subdivision to incorporate more diverse details and massing conditions, which will lead to a  more attractive and varied streetscape.  The reduced setbacks will allow for the maximization of  continuous  protected  open  space  as  well  as  reduce  the  amount  and  improve  the  efficiency  of  necessary, critical infrastructure systems.    (b) Minimum Lot Size: Per Section 27.10(F)(2)(b) – Applicability, and Section 27.10(F)(2)(d)(iii)(c) – Lot Size  Reduction, we request the ability to reduce the minimum lot size to no less than 6,500 square feet.   The reduction in lot size allows for the clustering of development, an instrumental element of the  Conservation  Subdivision  Design.    Lot  Size  Reduction  allows  for the maximization of continuous  protected open space, as well as reduce the amount and improve the efficiency of necessary, critical  infrastructure systems.    (c) Minimum Lot Width: Per Section 27.10(F)(2)(b) ‐ Applicability, and Section 27.10(F)(2)(d)(iii)(c) – Lot  Size Reduction, we request the ability to reduce the minimum lot width to no less than 50 feet.  This  reduction in size will allow for a minimum lot size of 50’ x 130’ (6,500 square feet) and will aid in the  clustering  of  the  development.    Lot  Width  Reduction  allows  for the  maximization  of  continuous  protected open space, as well as reduce the amount and improve the efficiency of necessary, critical  infrastructure systems.    (d) Recreation Area Credit: Per Section 27.10(F)(2)(b) – Applicability, we request that the passive and/or  active recreation amenities located within the ESOS resource management area be credited toward  the residential recreation area requirements.  The proposed recreation areas satisfy the locational  requirements of Section 26.5, Provision Recreational Area, and connectivity between the recreation  areas and open space has been maintained.    D. Effect on Existing Land Uses    Since the subject property is currently vacant, there will be no negative impact to existing land uses. This  residential development, with its relatively low proposed land use intensity, as well as landscape and  architectural standards, will be compatible with the surrounding neighborhoods.         Part II – Land Use Plan Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 49 2. Environmentally Sensitive Lands A. ESOS Selection & Preservation Methods In accordance with the General Plan and the ESLO, the most sensitive resources on the site will receive the greatest level of protection. Desert wash areas are vital resources in several ways. The associated riparian areas are biologically diverse, providing wildlife habitat and important movement corridors and connectivity for various wildlife species. These areas have the greatest priority among the resources existing on the property. This project will be in conformance with the ESL guidelines of the Zoning Code. The site plan provides at least 95% conservation of Critical Resource Areas and 25% open space within the Resource Management Areas Tier 2. The amount of CRA being preserved in its natural condition is 16.2± acres and the amount of RMA Tier 2 being preserved in its natural condition is 11.1± acres. An additional 5.9± acres of RMA Tier 2 will be revegetated and counted towards the ESOS calculations. In addition, the project avoids the minor washes and the significant vegetation throughout the site. The onsite ESOS areas help maintain open space connectivity within and beyond the project site, and will allow for uninterrupted wildlife movement. There are no Major Wildlife Linkages or Core Resource Areas within the subject property. ESOS within the community will be permanently preserved in accordance with ESL standards. This ESOS area will be permanently protected within as open space tract or easement. Ownership and maintenance of ESOS areas, which incorporate the RMA and CRA lands to be preserved, will be by the homeowners’ association. Any vegetation that is disturbed will meet the mitigation requirements as set forth in the Town of Oro Valley Zoning Code. Refer to Exhibit II-3-A: Proposed ESOS Map. Part II – Land Use Plan Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 50 3. Topography A. Design Response to Site Topography Due to the relatively flat character of the subject property and the lack of challenging topographic constraints, the development of this property can proceed within out special grading considerations. B. Slope Encroachment The subject property does not contain any regulated 15% or greater slopes, and as such there are no areas of encroachment. C. Hillside Conservation Areas There are no Hillside Conservation Areas on the subject property. D. Quantified Site Disturbance Approximately 57.6± acres (68%) of the site will be graded, and 27.6± acres (32%) of the site will be left in its natural condition, or improved as part of the recreation area. At least 5.9± acres of the graded areas of the site will be revegetated with native vegetation and will become landscaped common area bringing the effective open space area to at least 33.2± acres (39%) of the site. Refer to Exhibit II-3-A Proposed ESOS Map and Exhibit II-4-A: Proposed Grading Limits. Part II – Land Use Plan Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 51 4. Cultural / Archaeological / Historic Resources A. Resource Protection If any cultural resources are discovered during construction, State and local rules will be followed regarding the handling and treatment of such cultural resources. B. Treatment Plan The entire project site has been surveyed for archaeological resources (see Archaeological Survey of the La Cholla/Glover SWC Project Near Oro Valley, Pima County, Arizona 2009. No significant cultural or historic resources area known to occur on the site. In the unlikely event that cultural resources are uncovered during construction a professional archaeologist will evaluate the exposed material before any work continues in the area of the discovery. If any human remains or funerary objects are discovered during the construction of this project, all work will stop within the area of the remains and Dr. Tod Pitezel, ASM assistant curator of archaeology, will be contacted immediately. Part II – Land Use Plan Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 52 5. Hydrology A. Design Response to Site Hydrology/Modification of Drainage Patterns/Mitigation The site layout will impact hydrologic characteristics such as impervious cover and minor floodplain encroachment. Erosion control measures will be incorporated into the design for areas of encroachment into floodplains. As a result of increased impervious cover, detention basins will be constructed to detain the increased flows, and will feature outlet structures (weirs, culverts and/or catch basins) to discharge the basins as a metered flow rate no greater than existing conditions peak stormwater runoff rate. Detention basins will be spread throughout the development so as to minimize their visual impact. In-line detention is not proposed as part of this project. Where roadway crossings are proposed, culverts or bridges will be employed to convey stormwater past the crossings. The project will address not only onsite flows that will be produced by the increase in impervious surfaces, but also the flows entering the site from the north and east. The project will be designed to avoid negatively impacting upstream and downstream properties. All drainage improvements proposed outside of public right-of-way within this development will be owned and maintained by the HOA. Drainage design will be in accordance with the Town’s Drainage Criteria Manual and Floodplain Ordinance. During the detailed engineering design phase of each parcel, the developer will work closely with Town staff to identify ways to minimize erosion and channel down-cutting. D. Town Policy Conformance The post-developed 100-year discharges exiting the site will be maintained in their current condition. Town Policy requires all development to conform to “critical basin” requirements and not result in any adverse impacts for adjacent or downstream property owners. Part II – Land Use Plan Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 53 6. Wildlife A. Mitigation This development will preserve a minimum 95% of the Critical Resource Areas (CRA) onsite. These areas along the periphery of the site will be designated as open space which will maintain open space connectivity within and beyond the project site, which will allow for uninterrupted wildlife movement. Part II – Land Use Plan Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 54 7. Viewsheds A. Design Response to Site Viewsheds With the subject property being relatively flat, the projects internal roadway network and homesites will minimally disturb viewsheds. The semi-custom site will consist of 1-2 story homes with 25 foot maximum height. Bufferyards will be provided around the perimeter of the property to help mitigate views into the site. B. ORSCOD / TRCOD Conformance This property does not fall within the Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District (TRCOD) target area and is outside of the Oracle Road Scenic Corridor Overlay District (ORSCOD). The architectural design of these homes will be consistent with surrounding residential developments and will adhere to the Town of Oro Valley design guidelines. They will be constructed out of materials such as stucco, adobe, and wood frame, and will have either a gabled, tiled or flat roof. Part II – Land Use Plan Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 55 8. Traffic A. Traffic Impact Analysis Provide a traffic analysis report to include: i. The proposed internal circulation and access to/from arterial streets, explaining location and rationale for placement. The subject property will have three ingress/egress points that will connect this neighborhood directly to Glover Road to the north, La Cholla Boulevard to the east and Naranja Drive to the south. The Glover Road ingress/egress point is located 600 feet from the intersection of Glover Road and La Cholla Boulevard. The La Cholla Boulevard ingress/egress point will be approximately 680 feet north of the Arizona Rose Drive. The Naranja Drive driveway will be opposite the existing Gemini Drive, the Naranja Drive access point to the Estates at Capella residential development on the south side of Naranja Drive. ii. If off-site road improvements are required, indicate which roads and time frame for improvements. This project will require the construction of a three-lane paved cross section on Glover Road from La Cholla Boulevard to the eastern driveway into the site. West of the eastern driveway, Glover Road should taper down to a two-lane section. Improvements to Glover Road will need to include a shared-use path along the southern side of the roadway. A westbound left turn lane on Glover Road at the east driveway will be warranted based on Pima County turn lane warrants. Right turn lanes are not warranted on either Glover Road or Naranja Drive. Based on the location of the La Cholla Boulevard project access, a northbound left turn lane into the project site will be warranted to provide access into the site, but will need to limit the outbound traffic to right-out only. The Town of Oro Valley and Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) are currently in the design and/or construction phase on several projects located within the project vicinity including: • Tangerine Road will be widened from two lanes to four lanes with sidewalks and multi-use lanes from Interstate 10 (I-10) to La Cañada Drive. • Currently in the preliminary design phase, La Cholla Boulevard improvements will include widening the roadway from two lanes to a four lane median divided street from Overton Road to Tangerine Road. iii. Projected ADT for internal circulation system at build out and level of service to all streets. Include a projection of traffic volumes and capacity analysis for intersections. With and average daily trip (ADT) of 9.52 trips per household, the 178 residential lots proposed within this development will generate approximately 1,695 ADT. The local private streets inside this development and the abutting arterial roadways, which are operating below capacity, will be able to accommodate traffic generated from this project. Part II – Land Use Plan Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 56 iv. Impact to existing development abutting off-site streets. Once the widening of La Cholla Boulevard to a four-lane urban arterial is complete, it will improve the roadways and intersections in the vicinity of the project. This project will add only 2-5% of the traffic to the surrounding roads and intersections. v. Capacity analyses for proposed internal and off-site streets, including right-of-way and pavement widths, geometrics, design speeds and traffic control improvements needed. La Cholla Boulevard La Cholla Boulevard is a two-lane paved arterial road with a posted speed limit of 45 mph. The existing right-of-way varies between 70 and 150 feet and the ultimate right-of-way is 150 feet, which is continuous. According to the Pima Association of Governments (PAG) 2016 Traffic Volumes, the average daily trip volume (ADT) for this arterial roadway is between 6,100 and 7,800 vehicles per day. Glover Road Glover Road is a private two-lane paved road (one travel lane in each direction) partially owned by Amphitheater School District, with a posted speed limit of 35 mph. It provides direct access to the Richard B. Wilson Elementary and Middle School property, located one-third mile west of La Cholla Boulevard. The existing R.O.W. is 45 feet and the ultimate R.O.W. is 95 feet. This project will dedicate and additional 50 feet of R.O.W. to allow for the construction of necessary improvements to Glover Road. Construction of the improvements to Glover Road will be the responsibility of the developer and not the Town of Oro Valley. Estimated daily volumes on Glover Road are 2,300 vehicles per day west of La Cholla Boulevard and 1,300 vehicles per day east of La Cholla Boulevard. Naranja Drive Naranja Drive is a three-lane arterial road with one through lane in each direction and a two-way left turn lane. It has a posted speed of 35 mph. The existing and ultimate right-of-way width is 150 feet. According to available traffic data on the PAG website, there were approximately 4,700 vpd west of La Cholla (2014 count) and 6,500 vpd east of La Cholla Boulevard (2015 count) All project roadways will operate at level of service D through the year 2019 with the project site trips added. The existing intersections in the vicinity of the project that were analyzed in the attached Traffic Impact Study will operate at LOS D or better. Capacity analyses were also conducted for the project driveways and all will operate at LOS D or better with the project. vi. A description of improvements required for those streets described in sub-paragraph v. above. The traffic impact study found that a westbound left turn is warranted at the Glover Road access. This can be accommodated with a two-way left turn lane constructed from La Cholla Boulevard to this access location. The location of the La Cholla Boulevard access is 680 feet north of Arizona Rose Drive. A median opening on La Cholla Boulevard at Arizona Rose Drive is shown on the current widening plans. A directional northbound left turn lane could be constructed at the La Cholla Part II – Land Use Plan Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 57 project access location to allow northbound left turns into the project site. However, the proximity of this access to the median opening to the south precludes another median opening at the project access. If the project access was relocated to a midpoint between Glover Road and Arizona Rose Drive, it may be possible for this access to not be restricted. vii. The party/agency that the applicant believes to be responsible for making necessary improvements. The developer will be responsible for making the necessary improvements to Glover Road and La Cholla Boulevard. viii. Evidence that proposed turning movements will meet safety standards in relationship to traffic volumes. The proposed ingress/egress points for the project site are located on Naranja Drive, Glover Road and La Cholla Boulevard and are spaced to meet driveway spacing and corner clearance standards in relationship to speed limits and traffic volumes. The ingress/egress point on Naranja Drive will be located at existing curb cut and will be opposite an existing street (Gemini Drive). B. Proposed Rights-of-Way The proposed roadways within this development will have a right-of-way width of 50 feet and will meet the Town of Oro Valley Minimum Design Standards. All on-site vehicular circulation elements will be private if gated and owned by the HOA, otherwise they will be public. The project is planned to be gated. C. Proposed Pedestrian / Bicycle Circulation At the time of the Glover Road widening, a multi-use path/sidewalk will need to be developed along the south side of Glover Road. The proposed residential development will make pedestrian and bicycle connections to three shared-use paths located on Glover Road, La Cholla Boulevard, and Naranja Drive. Sidewalks will be constructed on both sides of the private streets within the project site, and will connect to the existing sidewalks and shared-use paths. Part II – Land Use Plan Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 58 9. Recreation / Trails A. Offsite Trail Access This development will provide connections to the Poppy Trail (Trail #33) that runs through the eastern portion of the site. There is one public park, West Lambert Park, with an acreage of 40± acres, located within one mile of the subject property. Additionally there are approximately 7± miles of offsite trails and walking paths that exist within one mile of the site. West Lambert Park provides natural hiking trails and natural open space amenities. B. Open Space Ownership The future HOA of this proposed development will own and maintain the open space within this project. Part II – Land Use Plan Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 59 10. Schools A. Student Generation The proposed development is expected to generate approximately 37 elementary students, 40 middle school students, and 23 high school students (using the accepted standard student multiplier of 0.2075 elementary school students per home, 0.2197 middle school students per home, and 0.1282 high school students per home). B. School Capacity According to the letter supplied by the Amphitheater Public Schools, there is available capacity for this proposed development. Part II – Land Use Plan Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 60 Amphitheater Capacity Letter Part II – Land Use Plan Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 61 Amphitheater Capacity Letter (cont’d) Part II – Land Use Plan Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 62 11. Water A. Water Demand A good estimate for domestic water usage is 230 gallons per day per lot dry weather flow. With 182 lots being proposed in this development, the total domestic water use is projected at 40,940 gallons per day. B. Water Service Provider & Capacity Oro Valley Water has the capacity and infrastructure available to serve this project. Part II – Land Use Plan Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 63 Water Service Provider Letter Part II – Land Use Plan Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 64 Part II – Land Use Plan Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 65 12. Wastewater A. Sewer Service Method According to Pima County Wastewater Reclamation Management Department capacity response letter, there is currently capacity in the public sewer G-90-033, downstream from manhole 5249-38. Public Sewer G-90-033 is an 8-inch PVC sewer pipe which transects the subject property at center from north to south and connects to a 12-inch PVC sewer pipe along Naranja Drive as it exits the subject property. Part II – Land Use Plan Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 66 Wastewater Service Provider Letter Part II – Land Use Plan Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 67 13. Bufferyards A. Mitigation A landscape bufferyard will be provided around the entire perimeter of the project site to help soften any visual impacts to surrounding landowners. The bufferyards will be composed from a variety of native vegetation and will help blend this residential neighborhood with the surrounding developments. They will be a minimum of 15-25 feet wide and will be in accordance with the Bufferyard “A” and “B” criteria in the Town of Oro Valley Zoning Code. Part II – Land Use Plan Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 68 14. Exhibits GLOVER RD.LA CHOLLA BLVD.NARANJA DR. 14 MILE FROM PROJECT SITE R1-7 R1-10 R1-7 PAD R1-7 R1-20 IRONWOOD RIDGE HIGH SCHOOL R1-7 R1-36 C-N R1-144 R1-144 R1-144 R1-144 R1-144 R1-20 Q:\199032\B-004 Saguaros Viejos Ph. 2 Eastside\01 Planning\04 Rezone or GPA\Site Analysis\Exhibits\Exh 2-2-A - P Zoning.dwg Plotted: Jul. 03, 2017600' Inc. Group The WLB 0' 70 Exhibit II-2-A Proposed Zoning Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 GLOVER RD.LA CHOLLA BLVD.NARANJA DR. AREA WITHIN 15' ESOS SETBACK TO BE REVEGETATED AND COUNTED AS ESOS Q:\199032\B-004 Saguaros Viejos Ph. 2 Eastside\01 Planning\04 Rezone or GPA\Site Analysis\Exhibits\Exh 2-3-A - P ESL.dwg Plotted: Feb. 12, 2018400' Inc. Group The WLB 0' 71 Exhibit II-3-A Proposed ESOS Map Area Onsite CRA (17.1± Ac.) RMA TIER 2 (68.1± Ac.) Revegetated 15' RMA Buffer (85.2± Ac.) ESL OPEN SPACE LEGEND: ESL Category Total Minimum ESOS Required 16.2± Ac. (95%) 17.0± Ac. (25%) N/A 33.2± Ac. (39%) Total Open Space Provided 16.2± Ac. *11.1± Ac. 5.9± Ac. 33.2± Ac. (39%) Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 *Includes Recreation Area GLOVER RD.LA CHOLLA BLVD.NARANJA DR.Q:\199032\B-004 Saguaros Viejos Ph. 2 Eastside\01 Planning\04 Rezone or GPA\Site Analysis\Exhibits\Exh 2-4-A - P Grading Limits.dwg Plotted: Feb. 13, 2018400' Inc. Group The WLB 0' 72 Exhibit II-4-A Proposed Grading Limits LEGEND: PROPOSED UNDISTURBED AREA (27.6± Ac. or 32%)* MAXIMUM PROPOSED GRADED AREA (57.6± Ac. or 68%) CRITICAL RESOURCE AREA Saguaros Viejos Phase II - Rezoning Site Analysis WLB No. 199032-B-004 *INCLUDING RECREATION AREA March 6, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission 1 MINUTES ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR SESSION March 6, 2018 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CAÑADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER Chair Hurt called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Charlie Hurt, Chair Melanie Barrett, Vice Chair Tom Drzazgowski, Commissioner Thomas Gribb, Commissioner Bob Swope, Commissioner Don Cox, Commissioner EXCUSED: Nathan Basken, Commissioner ALSO PRESENT: Bayer Vella, Planning Manager Paul Keesler, Town Engineer David Laws, Permitting Manager Joe Andrews, Chief Civil Deputy Attorney PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Chair Hurt led the audience and Commissioners in the Pledge of Allegiance. CALL TO AUDIENCE There were no speaker requests. COUNCIL LIAISON COMMENTS Council Liaison Bill Rodman did not have any comments. REGULAR SESSION AGENDA March 6, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission 2 1. REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE FEBRUARY 6, 2018 REGULAR SESSION MEETING MINUTES MOTION: A motion was made by Commissioner Cox and seconded by Commissioner Drzazgowski to approve the minutes as written. MOTION carried, 6-0. 2. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON A REQUEST FOR CONCEPTUAL MODEL HOME ARCHITECTURE FOR SPLENDIDO AT RANCHO VISTOSO, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF RANCHO VISTOSO BLVD SOUTH OF VISTOSO HIGHLANDS DRIVE, OV1702737 Senior Planning Technician Patty Hayes gave a presentation that included the following: - Purpose - Location - Site Plan - Design Standards and Principles - Four Sided Architecture - Materials - Colors - Compatibility - Summary and Recommendation Monica Willemsen, representing Solomon Cordwell Buenz, gave a presentation that included the following: - Phase 3B Site Plan - Villas D, E, F and G - Floor plans of each model - Renderings of each model - Proposed materials - Elevations of each model Discussion ensued amongst the Commission and applicant regarding Agenda Item 2. MOTION: A motion was made by Commissioner Cox and seconded by Vice Chair Barrett to approve the Conceptual Model Home Architecture for Splendido Villas D, E, F and G based on the finding that the request complies with the Design Principles and Design Standards of the Zoning Code. MOTION carried, 6-0. 3. PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSSION REGARDING A PROPOSED REZONING FROM R1-144 TO PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT FOR APPROXIMATELY March 6, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission 3 199-ACRES LOCATED WEST OF LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD BETWEEN LAMBERT LANE AND NARANJA DRIVE AND 8.2-ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD AND NARANJA DRIVE, OV1601793 Principal Planner Michael Spaeth gave a presentation that included the following: - Purpose - Location - Proposal - Background information on La Cholla Improvements, La Cholla Corridor, General Plan Amendment and Special Area Policies - Rezoning Request: Review Tools, Planned Area Development, Development Scenarios, Recreation Areas, Code Modifications - Issues associated with Canada Hills Drive - Public Participation Process - Key Factors - Summary and Recommendation Paul Oland, WLB Group, spoke about the length and history of the process for this property. Discussion ensued amongst the Commission, staff and applicant regarding Agenda Item 3. Chair Hurt opened the public hearing. The following individuals spoke on Agenda Item #3: - Oro Valley resident Rosalie Roszak - Oro Valley resident Vicki Stepp (opposed) - Oro Valley resident Mike Sanderson (opposed) - Oro Valley resident Jason Todd - Oro Valley resident Steve Shaffer (opposed) - Oro Valley resident Charles O'Neal (opposed) - Oro Valley resident Kevin Moore Chair Hurt closed the public hearing. Chair Hurt stated this is the first of two public hearings on this item for the Planning and Zoning Commission and there will be another opportunity for the public to speak on this case next month. 4. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION: CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN, LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RECREATION AREA PLAN FOR SAGUARO VIEJOS PHASE 1, A 44 LOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION, LOCATED March 6, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission 4 WEST OF LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD AND NORTH OF NARANJA ROAD, OV1701536 Chair Hurt recessed the meeting at 7:29 p.m. and reconvened at 7:39 p.m. Senior Planner Milini Simms gave a presentation that included the following: - Purpose - Location of Property - History - Conceptual Site Plan - Saguaros - Recreation Area Plan - Conceptual Landscape Plan - Public Participation - Summary and Recommendation Paul Oland, WLB Group, provided a presentation that included background on the densities, appropriate uses of the land and density transition. Discussion ensued amongst the Commission, staff and applicant regarding Agenda Item 4. Chair Hurt opened the public hearing. There were no speaker requests. Chair Hurt closed the public hearing. MOTION: A motion was made by Commissioner Drzazgowski and seconded by Commissioner Cox to recommend approval of the Conceptual Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Recreation Area Plan for Phase 1 of the Saguaro Viejos subdivision, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1, finding the request is in conformance with the Design Principles and applicable Design Standards. MOTION carried, 6-0. 5. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST TO REZONE AN 85.2-ACRE PROPERTY LOCATED NEAR THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF NARANJA DRIVE AND LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD FROM R1-20 AND R1-144 TO R1-7, OV1701685 Senior Planner Milini Simms gave a presentation that included the following: - Purpose - Location - History March 6, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission 5 - Zoning - Review Tools - Tentative Development Plan - Environmental Resources - Public Participation - Summary and Recommendation Paul Oland, WLB Group, provided a presentation that included: - Conservation of saguaros on the property - Glover Road improvements - Density transition in conformance with General Plan Discussion ensued amongst the Commission, staff and applicant regarding Agenda Item 5. Chair Hurt opened the public hearing. The following individuals spoke on Agenda Item 5: Oro Valley resident Diane Peters (opposed) Oro Valley resident Walter Goodwillie (opposed) Oro Valley resident Sarah Bertrand (opposed) Oro Valley resident Eric Gormally (opposed) Chair Hurt closed the public hearing. MOTION: A motion was made by Commissioner Cox and seconded by Commissioner Drzazgowski to recommend approval of the Saguaros Viejos East Rezoning from R1 - 144 and R1-20 to R1-7, including the use of ESL's Flexible Design Options, based on the finding that the request is consistent with the Zoning Code and the Your Voice, Our Future General Plan, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1. Discussion continued amongst the Commission, staff and applicant regarding Agenda Item 3. MOTION failed, 3-3 with Vice Chair Barrett, Commissioner Gribb, and Commissioner Swope opposed. Chief Civil Deputy Attorney Joe Andrews stated that an action needed to be taken, either to continue item to next meeting to revote or break the tie vote tonight. Planning Manager Bayer Vella stated that he would recommend that a vote be taken tonight to move this item forward. March 6, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission 6 Further discussion ensued amongst the Commission, staff and applicant regarding Agenda Item 3. MOTION: A motion was made by Commissioner Cox and seconded by Commissioner Gribb to deny the Saguaros Viejos East Rezoning from R1 -144 and R1-20 to R1-7, based on the finding that the request is not consistent with the Zoning Code and Your Voice, Our Future General Plan as presented, with the understanding that this motion is made to get item to move forward, as a recommending body. MOTION carried, 5-1 with Commissioner Drzazgowski opposed. 6. PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER TO REPLACE EXISTING UTILITY POLES ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF TANGERINE ROAD, BETWEEN SHANNON ROAD AND COPPER MOUNTAIN DRIVE, OV1800362 Planning Manager Bayer Vella gave a presentation that included the following: - Purpose - Location Map - Proposal - Review Tools: Conditional Use Permit Criteria - Photo depicting an existing and proposed pole - Summary and Recommendation Jason Saline, Tucson Electric Power, gave a presentation that included the following: - Purpose and need - What will be built - How it will be built - Design considerations - New poles will be taller and stronger - Nine -foot average height difference - Includes a raptor protection program Discussion ensued amongst the Commission, staff and applicant regarding Agenda Item 6. Chair Hurt opened the public hearing. The following individuals spoke on Agenda Item 6: - Non Oro Valley resident Alyssa Page - Oro Valley resident Timothy Bohen March 6, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission 7 Chair Hurt closed the public hearing. Mr. Saline spoke about the challenges on burying these power lines due to the cost, size of wires and keeping them cool. It is safer and more reliable to have them above ground. MOTION: A motion was made by Commissioner Drzazgowski and seconded by Commissioner Swope to recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit to allow Tucson Electric Power to replace the existing utility poles on the south side of Tangerine Road between Copper Mountain Drive and Shannon Road, based on the finding that the proposal is consistent with the Conditional Use Permit Review Criteria. Vice Chair Barrett would like to suggest the bird nesting feature be included in the staff report for Council to consider. Planning Manager Bayer Vella stated it would be prudent to make this a motion to understand that this is the will of the Commission. Chair Hurt stated that the council members present at this meeting could relay this information to the other council members. MOTION carried, 6-0. 7. PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING A ZONING CODE TEXT AMENDMENT RELATED TO THE ECONOMIC EXPANSION ZONE (EEZ), OV1800397 The meeting was recessed at 9:29 p.m. and reconvened at 9:35 p.m. Planning Manager Bayer Vella gave a presentation that included the following: - Proposed Amendment - Background - Economic Expansion Zone - Recommendation Discussion ensued amongst the Commission and staff regarding Agenda Item 7. Chair Hurt opened the public hearing. The following individual spoke on Agenda Item 7: Oro Valley resident Dave Perry (support). He also referred to his letter that was provided to the Commission. Chair Hurt closed the public hearing. March 6, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission 8 Discussion continued amongst the Commission and staff regarding Agenda Item 7. MOTION: A motion was made by Vice Chair Barrett to recommend approval of the Zoning Code Amendment (Attachment 1) to Section 24.9, related to purpose and applicability of the Economic Expansion Zone (EEZ), with the exception of Miller Ranch due to the fact that the Leman Academy is built on that property. Motion did not receive a second and was lost. MOTION: A motion was made by Commissioner Cox and seconded by Commissioner Drzazgowski to recommend approval of the Zoning Code Amendment (Attachment 1) to Section 24.9, related to purpose and applicability of the Economic Expansion Zone (EEZ). MOTION carried, 6-0. Further discussion continued amongst the Commission and staff regarding Agenda Item 7. 8. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON INITIATION OF CODE AMENDMENT RELATED TO ACREAGE FOR RECREATION Planning Manager Bayer Vella stated this item is only to initiate the process; not voting on any specifics, but just adding to the Planning Work Plan. Vice Chair Barrett explained why she brought forth this issue. Instead of multiple, smaller parks in subdivisions, she would like to see bigger parks that can bring people together. The current zoning code doesn't provide preference for this. Chair Hurt opened the public hearing. The following individual spoke on Agenda Item 8. Non resident Alyssa Page Chair Hurt closed the public hearing. Discussion ensued amongst the Commission and staff regarding Agenda Item 8. MOTION: A motion was made by Vice Chair Barrett and seconded by Commissioner Drzazgowski to continue item not to a date certain. MOTION carried, 6-0. PLANNING UPDATE (INFORMATIONAL ONLY) March 6, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission 9 Planning Manager Bayer Vella reviewed the items currently on the agenda for the next Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on April 3, 2018. ADJOURNMENT Chair Hurt adjourned the meeting at 10:19 p.m. Prepared by: Jeanna Ancona Senior Office Specialist I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the regular session Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of Oro Valley, Arizona held on the 6th day of March, 2018. I further certify that the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present.    Planning & Zoning Commission AGENDA ITEM: 5. Meeting Date:03/06/2018   Requested by: Bayer Vella, Community Development & Public Works  Submitted By:Rosevelt Arellano, Community Development & Public Works Case Number: OV1701685 SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST TO REZONE AN 85.2-ACRE PROPERTY LOCATED NEAR THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF NARANJA DRIVE AND LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD FROM R1-20 AND R1-144 TO R1-7, OV1701685 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the proposed rezoning subject to the conditions in Attachment 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant proposes to rezone an 85.2-acre property from R1-144 and R1-20 to R1-7 to develop a residential subdivision, located near the northwest corner of Naranja Drive and La Cholla Boulevard. The request includes two flexible design options enabled by the Environmentally Sensitive Lands regulations: 1) smaller building setbacks and 2) reduced lot size and width.   The application (Attachment 2) proposes the following:  178 lots with a minimum lot size ranging from 6,500 to 16,000 square feet Density: 2.1 homes per acre Open space: 33-acres (39% of site) Open space: 33-acres (39% of site) Use: Detached single-family homes Passive and active recreation areas, including pedestrian trails 3 access points: Glover Road (north), La Cholla Blvd (east) and Naranja Drive (south) BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: A. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND CONTEXT   Site Conditions  85.2 acres Property is vacant Two main wash corridors traversing the site from north to south Numerous significant saguaros that are 24 feet and higher with multiple arms Approvals-To-Date  2007: Rezoning from R1-144 to R1-20  Total lots: 74 Minimum lot size: 20,000 sf Building height: 18’, two-story Land Use Context The existing land use and zoning designations for the property and the surrounding area are outlined below and depicted on Attachments 3 and 4.   LAND USE ZONING DESIGNATION Subject Property Vacant R1-20 and R1-144 North Single-family residential 3-plus acre lots Wilson Middle School R1-144 West Single-family residential 20,000 sf lots R1-20 East Single-family residential 7,000 and 10,000 sf lots R1-7 and R1-10 South Single-family residential 7,000 sf and 3-plus acre lots R1-7 and and R1-144 General Plan Designations   The Your Voice Our Future General Plan Map (Attachment 5) designates the property as Medium Density Residential (MDR).  Medium Density Residential (MDR, 2.1-5.0 DU/AC): This land use designation represents areas where single-family home, townhouse or patio home development is appropriate. The lot sizes in this land use designation allow for setbacks between individual homes (detached) or common walls between individual homes (attached). These areas should be located close to schools, shopping, and employment. Zoning Designations   The Zoning Map (Attachment 4) shows that the property is zoned R1-20 (1 home per 20,000 square feet of land) and R1-144 (1 home per 144,000 square feet of land).  R1-20 Single-Family Residential District: This district provides for low-density detached single-family residential development. R1-144 Single-Family Residential District: This district is intended to promote and preserve suburban-rural single-family residential development. The large lot size permits agricultural uses and promotes open space. B. PROPOSED REZONING   The applicant proposes to rezone an 85.2-acre site from R1-20 and R1-144 to R1-7. The Tentative Development Plan (Attachment 6) depicts:  178 lots with a minimum lot size ranging from 6,500 to 16,000 square feet  6,500 sf (103 lots) 7,000 sf (64 lots) 16,000 sf (11 lots) Density: 2.1 homes per acre Use: Detached single-family homes Building height: 25’, two-story Open space: 33-acres (39% of site) Passive and active recreation areas, including pedestrian trails 3 access points: Glover Road (north), La Cholla Blvd (east) and Naranja drive (south) Rezoning Analysis   The applicant’s request has been reviewed for conformance with the Zoning Code and the Your Voice Our Future General Plan. A discussion of the application’s conformance with each of these items is provided below. R1-7 Zoning District Conformance   The proposed Tentative Development Plan (TDP) conforms to the development standards of the R1-7 zoning district. Please note, additional zoning standards will be addressed during the Final Site Plan review process. The following development standards are notable for this proposal:  Minimum Lot Size: The minimum lot size is 7,000 square feet. The proposed TDP conforms to this standard by utilizing the conservation subdivision design lot reduction incentive provided under ESL. This incentive is discussed in greater detail under the ESL Flexible Design Option section below. Building Heights: Building height is limited to twenty-five (25’) feet, two-stories in the R1-7 zoning district. It is worth noting that there are no existing homes immediately west of the project site, therefore, the proposed building height of twenty-five (25’) feet, two-stories will not impact any existing views of the Catalina Mountains to the east. Access and Circulation: The property is accessed by three driveways 1) Glover Road (north) 2) La Cholla Blvd (east) and 3) driveways 1) Glover Road (north) 2) La Cholla Blvd (east) and 3) Naranja drive (south). The proposed entrances meet driveway spacing requirements and have been approved by the Town Engineer. Additionally, the proposed TDP incorporates trails and pathways throughout the design and connects to larger regional trails in the surrounding area. To ensure sufficient infrastructure, several rezoning conditions from the previously approved rezoning case for this property have been added to Attachment 1. These conditions relate to roadway dedication and improvements, cost sharing, and water utility infrastructure. Neighborhood Compatibility: The property is located in proximity to two schools and rural and suburban size lots (e.g., 6,600 square feet to 3.3-plus acres). Rezoning this site to R1-7 requires sensitivity to the existing context by using design and mitigation techniques to improve compatibility. To ensure compatibility with the surrounding uses, the applicant proposes the following measures:  Placing larger lots (e.g., 16,000 square feet) along the northern and eastern property lines where the adjacent subdivisions contain 3.3-acres and 10,000 square foot lots, respectively. Using the existing wash along the west property line as a 150’-plus wide natural buffer between the proposed development and future large lot subdivision (Saguaros Viejos Phase 1) to the west. Installing internal sidewalks to provide pedestrian connectivity to nearby schools, sidewalks, and multi-use paths. ESL Flexible Design Option The Environmentally Sensitive Lands (ESL) requirements enable the use of incentives, or flexible design options, subject to Town Council approval. The flexible design options are available to property owners when open space is applied to at least twenty-five (25%) or more of the property. The applicant has provided thirty-nine (39%) open space allowing them to request these options. The following flexible design options requested by the applicant are shown below, followed by staff commentary.  Smaller building setbacks: Reduce the side setbacks from seven and a half (7.5’) feet to no less than five (5’) feet, and the front setbacks from twenty (20’) feet to no less than fifteen (15’) feet, provided that it does not result in an on-lot driveway less than twenty (20’) feet in length.  Staff Commentary: The proposed setback reductions is a reasonable request because it would allow a more varied and attractive streetscape, while maintaining a sufficient driveway length for on-lot parking. Lot size and width reductions: Reduce the minimum lot size from 7,000 square feet to 6,500 square feet, and the minimum lot width from seventy (70’) feet to fifty (50’) feet for the 103 of 178 lots.  Staff Commentary: The ESL regulations provide a lot reduction incentive for applicants who choose to employ a conservation subdivision design. The incentive allows for a reduction to 5,500 square feet in the R1-7 zoning district with a concomitant lot width reduction. The TDP (Attachment 6) proposes a lot reduction (e.g., 6,500 square foot lots and 50’ wide) for 103 lots of the 178 lots. This is a reasonable request because it allows the proposed residential development to meet the conservation objectives outlined in ESL, which seeks to protect critical resource areas (e.g., existing washes) while achieving base zoning densities through the use of flexible design options.  Environmentally Sensitive Lands (ESL)  Conservation Categories (Biologically Based): The subject property is designated Critical Resource Area (CRA) and Resource Management Area (RMA) Tier 2 on the ESL Planning Map. The property is traversed with two wash corridors, which are designated CRA and must be conserved at 95% open space. The remainder of the property is categorized as Resource Management Area (RMA) Tier 2, requiring a conservation of at least 25% open space. The proposed TDP conserves 95% of the CRA and 25% of the RMA. There are numerous significant saguaros on this site, which qualify as important individual specimens and ESL Core Resources. All large saguaros (24’ or taller with two or more arms) shown on the Tentative Development are to be preserved in place. Conservation Categories (Non-biologically Based): The applicant has submitted a letter from the Arizona State Museum (ASM) indicating that the property has been surveyed and no cultural resources have been identified on the site. General Plan Analysis   The applicant’s proposal has been reviewed for conformance with the Vision, Goals and Policies of the Your Voice Our Future General Plan. The most notable goals and policies are shown in italics followed by staff commentary, are discussed below:   General Plan Vision   Oro Valley strives to be a well-managed community that provides all residents with opportunities for quality living. Oro Valley will keep its friendly, small-town, neighborly character, while increasing services, employment and recreation. The Town’s lifestyle continues to be defined by a strong sense of community, a high regard for public safety and an extraordinary natural environment and scenic views. Staff Commentary: The Vision Statement emphasizes the need to carefully balance land use decisions which respond to current conditions, against the long term impacts to the community. The proposed rezoning to R1-7 conforms with the Vision Statement by providing housing for employees and students of the adjacent schools and nearby employment areas, while protecting the existing washes on the property.   General Plan Goals and Policies   Below is a list of notable Goals and Policies followed by staff commentary on compliance.  Goal K: The proactive conservation, protection and restoration of environmentally sensitive lands, natural resource areas and habitats and lands with high scenic value. Staff Commentary: The proposed TDP utilizes the Conservation Subdivision Design incentive which enables front setback and lot size reductions. These design incentives allow the proposed development to better conserve the existing washes and create a more environmentally sensitive site plan design. To further conservation, a rezoning condition requiring all large saguaros (e.g., 24’ or taller with two or more arms) shown on the Tentative Development be preserved in place has been added to Attachment 1. The applicant’s proposal is in conformance with the General Plan Policy.  Policy SD.2: Protect and provide connections between contiguous, environmentally sensitive lands within the Town, including key habitat areas and significant natural resource areas. Policy SD.8: Encourage development project designs that connect wildlife habitat areas, avoid disturbing significant wildlife habitats and minimize the overall impacts on wildlife habitat areas. Staff Commentary: The applicant’s proposal seeks to protect the two existing washes on the property. The proposed TDP meets the ESL regulations by conserving ninety five (95%) percent of the Critical Resource Areas (wash corridors/wildlife habitat), and twenty five (25%) percent of the Resource Management Area (balance of the property) in natural open space. The preservation of these washes will allow animals to move from one wildlife corridor to another. The applicant’s proposal is in conformance with the General Plan Policy.  LU.5. Provide diverse land uses that meet the Town's overall needs and effectively transition in scale and density adjacent to neighborhoods. Staff Commentary: The proposed subdivision design and density (2.1 homes per acre) are similar to the single-family neighborhoods to the east (1.7 and 2.64 homes per acre) and south (2.47 homes per acre), therefore, the proposed rezoning will not alter the existing development character and transitions. Engineering Comments Drainage:  The proposed rezoning request acknowledges the development will be designed so post-developed drainage conditions are consistent with pre-developed conditions in accordance with Town drainage requirements.  Several natural washes affect the subject property, flowing in a southerly direction through the development.   A preliminary drainage analysis was prepared by the applicant to determine existing 100-year stormwater runoff values flowing through each wash, at points entering and exiting the project boundaries.  The drainage system for the project will be designed to ensure, among other requirements, that all proposed habitable structures adjacent to a wash will be protected from flooding and erosion.  The increase of runoff resulting from constructed impervious surfaces will be mitigated by use of detention basins which discharge into the existing watercourses.  The detention basins capture, hold, and release stormwater in a controlled manner to mimic existing conditions.   Traffic:  The proposed development will have three gated entrances, one each along Glover Road, La Cholla Boulevard and Naranja Drive.  The three access points help distribute incoming and outgoing traffic around the site which helps to reduce the impact to surrounding streets.  The generation of new traffic from the proposed subdivision will be similar to other subdivisions of the same size and character, which is generally low when compared to other higher intensity uses.  Internal streets within this development will be private, gated and constructed to Town of Oro Valley Subdivision Street Standards.  Off-site improvements will include right-of-way dedication and the widening of Glover Road along the project frontage by the developer.  Furthermore, construction for the widening of La Cholla Boulevard to four lanes, as funded by the RTA, is anticipated to begin during the summer of 2018.  These off-site improvements will increase roadway capacity and safety to accommodate projects such as this one.  Public roadway improvements to be completed by the developer shall be at their expense and will require approval and a permit issued from the Town Engineer’s office.   C. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION   Summary of Public Notice   Public notice has been provided:  Notification of all property owners within 600 feet and extended area Homeowners Association mailing Advertisement in The Daily Territorial newspaper Post on property Post at Town Hall and on website Neighborhood Meetings Two neighborhood meetings were held on March 22, 2017 and December 7, 2017 with approximately 18 and 3 residents, respectively. The main topics discussed at the meetings included access points, view preservation, building height, open space, land use transition, school capacity, and mass grading. A copy of the neighborhood meeting summary notes are included as Attachment 7. RECOMMENDATION:   Based on the finding that the proposed rezoning is consistent with the Zoning Code and the Your Voice Our Future General Plan, it is recommended that the Planning and Zoning Commission take the following action: Recommend to Town Council approval of the rezoning and ESL Flexible Design Options, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to recommend approval of the Saguaros Viejos East Rezoning I move to recommend approval of the Saguaros Viejos East Rezoning from R1-144 and R1-20 to R1-7, including the use of ESL’s Flexible Design Options, based on the finding that the request is consistent with the Zoning Code and the Your Voice Our Future General Plan, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1.   OR   I move to recommend denial of the Saguaros Viejos East Rezoning from R1-144 and R1-20 to R1-7, based on the finding that the request is not consistent with the Zoning Code and/or Your Voice Our Future General Plan, specifically ____________________________________.   Attachments Attachment 1 - Rezoning Conditions  Attachment 2 - Application  Attachment 3 - Location Map  Attachment 4 - Zoning Map  Attachment 5 - General Plan Map  Attachment 6 - Tentative Development Plan  Attachment 7 - Neighborhood Meeting Summaries  Saguaros Viejos (Phase 2) History (OV1701685) Attachment 6 Previous Approvals Current Proposal Land Area Approx. 83 acres 85.2 acres Number of lots 74 178 Lot size 16,058-59,502 sf 6,500-16,000 sf Average lot size 28, 371 sf 7,320 sf Open Space conserved 8.2 acres-26% (both phases)33 acres-39% Naranja Dr. Glover Rd.La Cholla Blvd..Glover Rd.La Cholla Blvd..Naranja Dr. Previously approved design Proposed design    1    Neighborhood Meeting Summary Saguaro Viejos Proposed Land Use Change (Rezoning) and Conceptual Site Plan March 22, 2017 6:00 – 7:30 PM Town of Oro Valley Town Council Chambers 1. Introductions and Welcome Meeting Facilitator Chad Daines, Principal Planner, introduced the Oro Valley staff Michael Spaeth, Senior Planner, as project manager. Approximately 18 residents and interested parties attended the meeting, including Vice Mayor Waters, Council member Hornat and Council member Rodman. Also in attendance was Conceptual Design Review Board Member Herrington and Planning and Zoning Commission Chairman Hurt, Vice Chair Barrett and Commission member Swope. Staff Presentation Michael Spaeth, Senior Planner, provided a presentation that included:  Subject Property  Applicant’s request  Existing land use and zoning of the property, including development standards  Review Focus  Traffic, drainage, water and cultural resources review  Relation to the nearby school district  Review process  Public participation opportunities 2. Applicant Presentation Paul Oland from the planning firm WLB Group Inc., provided a presentation detailing the applicant’s proposal, which included:  Overview of project  Traffic impact and proposed widening of Glover Road  Anticipated architectural style for the subdivision 3. Public Questions & Comments Following is a summary of additional questions and comments:  What will be developed in the vacant land between the subject property and La Cholla Blvd?  Why have the access point off of Glover Rd. instead of La Cholla Blvd?  How will Glover Rd. be widened and will it be extended (to the east or west)?  What about people traveling through on the private streets of the proposed development?  Will the surrounding views be taken into account for the proposed building height?  Will story poles be put in to show the building height? Attachment 7    2     Is there going to be a transition between the low density land use and the proposed medium-density?  What is the percentage of Open Space?  What is the timeline for the La Cholla widening and the proposed subdivision?  Does Amphitheatre School District (Wilson K-8) have the capacity for more students?  What is the proposed percentage of open space?  What will be the price range for these homes?  Who is the home builder?  How is the proposed density compared to the Estates at Capella?  Can this development be less dense, having less homes?  Will there be mass grading? Mr. Spaeth and Mr. Oland addressed some of the questions related to the proposed development and the associated traffic impacts. Based on resident questions and interest in seeing a revised plan based on the items discussed above, it was determined that a second neighborhood meeting would be held. Mr. Daines closed the meeting, thanked everyone for their attendance and encouraged everyone to contact Mr. Spaeth, the project manager, with any additional thoughts, comments or concerns. Attachment 7    1    Proposed Rezoning for Saguaros Viejos Neighborhood Meeting Summary Casas Adobes Church December 7, 2017 1. Introductions and Welcome Meeting Facilitator Michael Spaeth, Principal Planner, introduced the Oro Valley staff Rosevelt Arellano, Senior Planner, as the Town’s project manager. Three residents and interested parties attended the meeting, including Council Member Rodman and Planning and Zoning Commissioner Swope. 2. Public Questions & Comments Following is a summary of questions and comments:  A neighbor stated that he did not want to see a commercial use on the southwest corner of La Cholla Boulevard and Glover Road.  What is the proposed building height?  Where are the access points?  Who is the target market (e.g., young professionals, families, retirees, etc.)?  Will the site be mass graded?  What is the difference between the previously approved Tentative Development Plan and the proposed site plan design? Mr. Spaeth closed the meeting, thanked everyone for their attendance and encouraged everyone to contact Mr. Arellano, the Town’s project manager, with any additional thoughts, comments or concerns. Attachment 7