Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPackets - Council Packets (765) ** AMENDED (3-25-09, 2:00 p.m.) AGENDA ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION APRIL 01, 2009 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS — TOWN MANAGER COUNCIL REPORTS DEPARTMENT REPORTS TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT - Informational Items The Mayor and Council may consider and/or take action on the items listed below: ORDER OF BUSINESS: MAYOR WILL REVIEW THE ORDER OF THE MEETING CALL TO AUDIENCE -- At this time, any member of the public is allowed to address the Mayor and Town Council on any issue not listed on today's agenda. Pursuant to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, individual Council Members may ask Town Staff to review the matter, ask that the matter be placed on a future agenda, or respond to criticism made by speakers. However, the Mayor and Council may not discuss or take legal action on matters raised during "Call to Audience." In order to speak during "Call to Audience" please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. PRESENTATION: Pause for Paws 1. CONSENT AGENDA (Consideration and/or possible action) A. Minutes - 2-18-09; **2-25-09; 3-4-09 B. Building Safety Activity Report - February 2009 C. Coyote Run Transit Monthly Report - February 2009 D. Police Report - February 2009 E. Report on Meter Reader Supervisor and Meter Replacement Program F. Mayor & Council Trip Reports - March 2009 04/01/09 Agenda, Council Regular Session 2 G. Resolution No. (R)09 - 17 Authorizing and approving an pp g intergovernmental agreement between the Regional Transportation Authority of Pima County and Town of Oro Valley for provision of circulator bus service H. Resolution No.(R) 09 - 18 Approving a temporary construction and permanent slope easement between the Town of Oro Valley and Evergreen-Steam Pump, L.L.C. to acquire access to a portion of the property known as Pima County Tax Parcel No. 220-08-4620 for the construction of the Canada Del Oro Wash Pedestrian Bridge which is being constructed as a part of the Arizona Department of Transportation's State Route 77 (Oracle Road) expansion project I. Resolution No. (R)09 - 19 Approving a Memorandum of Understanding between Public Safety Employees and the Town of Oro Valley pursuant to Chapter 4, Section 4-1-8 of the Town Code, Public Safety Employee relations and processes effective July 1, 2009 to June 30, 2010 J. Resolution No. (R)09 - 20 Authorizing and approving an intergovernmental agreement between the Town of Oro Valley and Golder Ranch Fire District for the provision of Fire Marshal Services K. OV5-07-10 Approval of public art component "C" for the Wingate Inn Hotel, located within the Steam Pump Village development at the intersection of Oracle Road and Hanley Boulevard L. OV12-05-03B Approval of a development plan for the Homewood Suites Hotel and retail/restaurant buildings, located within the El Corredor development in proximity to the northeast corner of Oracle Road and Linda Vista Blvd. 2. **PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. (0)09 - 04 PERMITTING MOUNTAIN VIEW VISTA FIRE DISTRICT TO ANNEX AREAS WITHIN THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY LOCATED SOUTH OF HARDY ROAD 3. NARANJA TOWN SITE: CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE APPROVAL OF FORMATION OF BLUE RIBBON COMMITTEE AND/OR CITIZEN/VOTER SURVEY TO INCLUDE FACILITIES NEEDS ASSESSMENT 4. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS (The Council may bring forth general topics for future meeting agendas. Council may not discuss, deliberate or take any action on the topics presented pursuant to ARS 38-431.02H) CALL TO AUDIENCE — At this time, any member of the public is allowed to address the Mayor and Town Council on any issue not listed on today's agenda. Pursuant to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, individual Council Members may ask Town Staff to review the matter, ask that the matter be placed on a future agenda, or respond to criticism made by speakers. However, the Mayor and Council may not discuss or take legal action on matters raised during 04/01/09 Agenda, Council Regular Session g 3 "Call to Audience." In order to speak during "Call to Audience" lease specify p p Y what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. ADJOURNMENT POSTED: 03 20 09 AMENDED AGENDA POSTED: 03 27 09 4:00 p.m. 2:00 p.m. ejk ejk When possible, a packet of agenda materials as listed above is available for public inspection at least 24 hours prior to the Council meeting in the office of the Town Clerk between the hours of 8:00 a.m. — 5:00p.m. The Town of Oro Valley complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If any person with a disability needs any type of accommodation, please notify the Town Clerk's Office at least five days prior to the Council meeting at 229- 4700. INSTRUCTIONS TO SPEAKERS Members of the public have the right to speak during any posted public hearing. However, those items not listed as a public hearing are for consideration and action by the Town Council during the course of their business meeting. Members of the public may be allowed to speak on these topics at the discretion of the Chair. If you wish to address the Town Council on any item(s) on this agenda, please complete a speaker card located on the Agenda table at the back of the room and give it to the Town Clerk. Please indicate on the speaker card which item number and topic you wish to speak on, or if you wish to speak during "Call to Audience", please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. Please step forward to the podium when the Mayor announces the item(s) on the agenda which you are interested in addressing. 1. For the record, please state your name and whether or not you are a Town resident. 2. Speak only on the issue currently being discussed by Council. Please organize your speech, you will only be allowed to address the Council once regarding the topic being discussed. 3. Please limit your comments to 3 minutes. 4. During "Call to Audience" you may address the Council on any issue you wish. 5. Any member of the public speaking must speak in a courteous and respectful manner to those present. Thank you for your cooperation. icd }...q-0? c-r- Kathryn One Copy each to the Mayor and each Councilperson, to the Town Manager, to the Chief of Police, and, for yourself. Regards, Richard J. Tracy Even some distantc comic script writer/artist understands that crime goes up In a recession. :lass 6 Thursday,Mar.26,2009 Tucson,AZ Visit tucson.com or call 573-4343 to place your ad today. Po�'i s�JPPLN .' aiil!�� � i��ct� }�it lj�"'t.�����it t3f�H�;���':�' �� '`� 'c ��. ..:.-�,t�ie:•psi� .:�,� N141). DG-140,ND 4.1 VkloRK‘ RCRIot•I � J '�I _ •', ..-o.• � .:- j fat, .,.Ti-•�J 1-MIA rid `��- \\• ��- 4 :�': t{ih -'� • • � Y ,‹; ts=C. 5-7.4, '..' 1 #1 Imagine that the ATM 'is a Senear Citizen or his home in OV. #2 Imagine that the BadGuysobvlousl not drove into Town to 'just commit a crime. # 3 Imagine that OV isprotected `Six less Police Officers # 4 Now, Imagine what happens 'next, and whose fault 1t is. Respectfullysubmitted Richard J. Tracy Ad Hoc Public SafetyAdvocate :,,,� fir► , .30 14-1/L /9-bVVUGO-daiX Administration 2008 2009 Variance Personnel 482,832 593,513 110,681 * Contracts/Services 513,450 653,465 140.015# Supplies 27,500 96,650 69,150 Utilities 72,800 81,431 8,631 Capital Outlay 5,000 515,000 510,000 ** Contingency 0 50,000 50,000 * 888,477 888,477 Support Personnel 3,790,586 4,381,470 590,884 * Contracts/Services 393,041 322,410 (70,631)# Supplies 93,200 76,073 (21,100) Utilities 85,000 255,000 170,000**** Capital Outlay 126,300 65,500 (60,800) ** Contingency 85,000 90,884 5884*** 614,237 614,237 Field Personnel 5,448,601 5,604,140 155,540 * Contracts/Services 147,815 64,990 (82,824)# Supplies 103,114 54,600 (48,514) Utilities 119,318 0 (119,318)**** Capital Outlay 519,213 8,500 (582,713) (677,820) (677,820) Professional Development Personnel 294,925 361,919 66,994* Contracts/Services 89,750 102,682 12,932# Supplies 13,700 6,500 (7,200) Utilities 8,000 0 (8,000) 64,726 64,726 Professional Standards Personnel 256,000 105,424 (151,084)* Contracts/Services 28,295 16,200 (12,095)# Supplies 2,050 1,250 (800) Plilities 5000 0 (5000) (168,979) (168,979) Total 720,641 # Contract/Services -Adm 1,166,915 YEAR # Contract/Services - Support 715,451 YEAR # Contract/Services - Field 212,805 YEAR # Contract/Services—Prof Dev 192,432 YEAR # Contract/Services—Prof Std 44,495 YEAR *Personnel—Administration 110,681 VAR UP *Personnel— Support 590,884 VAR UP *Personnel—Field 15 5,540 VAR UP *Personnel—Profess Develop 66,994 VAR UP *Personnel—Prof Stands (151,084) VAR DOWN **Capital Outlay-Administration 520,000 YEAR **Capital Outlay—Support 191,800 YEAR ***Contingency—Administration 50,000 YEAR ***Contingency—Support 175,884 YEAR ****Utilities—Support 170,000 VAR UP ****Utilities—Field (119,318) VAR DOWN A DRAFT MINUTES ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION FEBRUARY 18, 2009 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 5:00 PM CALL TO ORDER - 5:01 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Paul Loomis, Mayor K.C. Carter, Vice Mayor Paula Abbott, Council Member (arrived at 5:02 p.m.) Bill Garner, Council Member Barry Gillaspie, Council Member (arrived at 5:04 P.m.) Al Kunisch, Council Member Salette Latas, Council Member EXECUTIVE SESSION AT OR AFTER 5:00 PM MOTION: A motion was made by Vice Mayor Carter and seconded by Council 411W Member Kunisch to go into Executive Session for the following purpose: Pursuant to 38-431.03(A)(3) for consultation for legal advice with the attorney relating to the potential elimination of positions in the Town's fiscal year 09/10 operating budget MOTION carried, 6-0. MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Kunisch and seconded by Vice Mayor Carter to go out of Executive Session at 6:05 p.m. MOTION carried, 7-0. RESUME REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER - 6:15 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Paul Loomis, Mayor K.C. Carter, Vice Mayor Paula Abbott, Council Member Bill Garner, Council Member Barry Gillaspie, Council Member Al Kunisch, Council Member Salette Latas, Council Member 02/18/09 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 2 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 11111) Mayor Loomis led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS Town Manager David Andrews reviewed the upcoming meetings and events. COUNCIL REPORTS - No reports. DEPARTMENT REPORTS Communications Administrator Mary Davis announced that a dedication ceremony for the Town's first Park 'N Ride facility would be held on Monday, March 2nd beginning at 9:00 a.m. She also reported that the final plans for the g g Town's 35th Anniversary have been completed and staff would be adding information to the website to inform the citizens of the planned activities. TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT Town Manager David Andrews reported that while attending the Arizona City g Mana ers' Association (ACMA) Conference, he and Assistant Town Manager Jerene Watson interviewed a student from Arizona State University g regardingan ACMA sponsored internship. (ACMA will provide a $3, 000 stipend). He explained that the Town of Oro Valley is one of two finalists for consideration of this internship. Mr. Andrews further reported that he was elected to serve a 2-year term on the ACMA's Board of Directors. Council Member Abbott announced that she would hold a "Council on Your Corner" event on Saturday, March 7th. She stated that Representative Nancy YoungWrightWri would also be present and they would be discussing education, budget cuts and sustainability. She also stated that attendees can bring non- perishable donations for the Community Food Bank. ORDER OF BUSINESS: MAYOR WILL REVIEW THE ORDER OF THE MEETING There being no objections, Mayor Loomis moved Item 5 before Item 4. CALL TO AUDIENCE - Lisa Powell, Oro Valley resident and President of Wilson K-8 's Parent/Teacher (PTO)Or anization addressed the Town's budget deficit. She commented that g the School Resource Officer (SRO) as provided by the Oro Valley Police 02/18/09 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 3 Department is a huge resource that the school desperately needs. She stated that if the SRO was taken away, it would affect the entire school. PRESENTATIONS 1) Pause for Paws - No presentation. 2) Presentation by the Kiwanis Club of Oro Valley thanking the Town for its support for the Christmas Tree Recycling Program Hank Jepsen and John Howserman, Oro Valley Kiwanis Club, presented a Plaque of Appreciation to the Council and the Town thanking everyone for their cooperation and support of their annual Christmas tree recycling program. 3) Presentation of the Distinguished Budget Presentation Award for Fiscal Year 2008/09 Town of Oro Valley Budget from the Government Finance Officers Association Mayor Loomis presented Wendy Gilden, Management and Budget Analyst and Stacey Lemos, Finance Director, with the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) plaque for the Distinguished Budget Presentation Award. 1. CONSENT AGENDA At the request of Council, Mayor Loomis pulled Items D, F, H and L from the Consent Agenda. MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Garner and seconded by Vice Mayor Carter to approve the Consent Agenda with the exception of Items D, F, H and L. MOTION carried, 7-0. A. Minutes - January 21 28, 2009 B. Coyote Run Monthly Report - January 2009 C. Economic Development Monthly Report - January 2009 D. Police Department Monthly Report - December 2008 (PULLED FOR DISCUSSION) In response to a question from Council Member Kunisch, Chief of Police Danny Sharp explained that any citizen can call in a license plate number if they have concerns. He also explained that the Citizen Volunteer Assistant's Program (CVAP) volunteers have been certified by the State of Arizona to access the 02/18/09 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 4 Arizona Criminal Justice system but they do call for backup and follow departmental protocol. MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Kunisch and seconded by Council Member Gillaspie to accept the Police Department Monthly Report dated January 2009. MOTION carried, 7-0. E. Resolution (R)09 - 09 Approving a Tactical Diversion Task Force Agreement between the Drug Enforcement Administration and the Town of Oro Valley for the participation in the DEA Tactical Diversion Squad Task Force F. Resolution No. (R)09 - 10 Authorizing and executing a license agreement between the Town of Oro Valley and the Oro Valley Historical Society to allow for thep lanting, cultivating, and maintenance of Native American and Pioneer Gardens and to permit guided site tours on the site known as Steam Pump Ranch (PULLED FOR DISCUSSION) Discussion followed regarding the status of Steam Pump Ranch, bond monies set aside for thep urchase and the master planning with approximately $340,000 remaining to be used for emergency stabilization, remaining cost of project will cost approximately $8 million, constant assessment of the property and stabilization of buildings, tours, historical garden is a volunteer effort, qualified archaeologists on the Historical Society, and discovery of photographs and artifacts that are be restored and preserved. MOTION: A motion was made by Vice Mayor Carter and seconded by Council Member Latas to approve Resolution (R)09-10. Council Member Abbott stated that she would oppose this item due to concerns regarding safety and liability. She stated that she would support this item after g g stabilization was completed. MOTION carried, 6-1 with Council Member Abbott opposed. G. OV12-07-17 Approval of a development plan for lot 6 of Mercado Del Rio property, located off Pusch View Lane directly west of Oracle Road H. Resolution No. (R)09 - 11 Supporting Arizona Public Education at all levels and to urge the Arizona State Legislature not to balance the state budget at the expense of public education (PULLED FOR DISCUSSION) Mayor Loomis opened the floor for public comment. 02/18/09 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 5 Donny Welsh, Oro Valley resident, thanked the Council for supporting his school. Erin Collier, Oro Valley resident, thanked the Council for consideration of the Resolution supporting public education. She further stated that the Amphitheater School District and parents are working on placing two overrides regarding the school's budget on the November 2009 ballot and she requested Council's support. Michael Slugocki, non-Oro Valley resident and a senior at the University of Arizona, thanked the Council for consideration of the Resolution. He stated that cuts in education are destroying schools and that the students suffer. He urged the Council to adopt the Resolution and to continue to fight against cuts in funding. Nancy Martin, Oro Valley resident and liaison to Wilson School K-8, thanked Council for supporting the effort. She stated that there are excellent public schools in Oro Valley and they provide a key element for a community of excellence. Council Member Abbott commented that education is the economic engine for Oro Valley and the impact of the budget cuts to education would cripple students and the State of Arizona. She then read an article that she would be placing in the Oro Valley Vista publication. MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Abbott and seconded by Vice Mayor Carter to approve Resolution (R)09-11 supporting Arizona public education at all levels and to urge the Arizona State Legislature not to balance the State budget at the expense of public education. Council Member Latas urged all citizens to contact their State legislators and ask them to "not balance the budget on the backs of the children". MOTION carried, 7-0. MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Abbott and seconded by Council Member Kunisch to approve the proposed League of Cities and Towns 2009 Resolution urging the State Legislature to fully fund higher education programs especially at post-secondary levels throughout the State of Arizona. MOTION carried, 7-0. I. Appointment of Robert Turnbull as the Town of Oro Valley representative to the Tucson-Pima County Bicycle Advisory Committee with term effective January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2011 110 J. Appointment of Robert LaMaster and D. Alan Caine to the Planning & 02/18/09 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 6 Zoning Commission with terms effective February 19, 2009 - July 31, 2009 K. Appointment of Joy Nelson, member of Friends of Green Valley Public Library to the Oro Valley Library Review Committee L. Request for Approval to use Budgeted Cash Reserves from the Water Utility Enterprise FY 08-09 Budget for the purchase of Groundwater Extinguishment Credits in an amount not to exceed $700,000.00 to reduce payment obligations ment obli to the Central Arizona Groundwater Replenishment District (PULLED FOR DISCUSSION) In response to questions from Vice Mayor Carter, Water Utility Director Philip p Saletta explained that $700,000 would be a one-time expenditure this fiscal p next year. However, the Utility would use the water that was purchased over the e 2-3 years; therefore, savings would be realized during that time period. MOTION: A motion was made by Vice Mayor Carter and seconded by Council Member Kunisch to approve Item L, request for approval to use budgeted cash reserves from the Water Utility Enterprise 2008/09 budget for the purchase of Groundwater Extinguishment Credits in an amount not to exceed $700,000. MOTION carried, 7-0. 2. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE DIRECTION TO STAFF TO FORMALLY INITIATE A CHANGE TO THE TOWN CODE AND BOARD 11114 AND COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES AND POLICIES FOR APPOINTMENT (Continued from January 21 , 2009) Tory Schlievert, Management Assistant, stated that since the January 21st � (CPI)meetin staff has olled the graduates of the Citizens Planning Institute g, p for their input on the proposed changes to the appointment process for Boards and Commissions. She then reviewed a PowerPoint presentation detailingthepotential process change to the appointments for the Town's Boards and Commissions. MOTION: A motion was made by Vice Mayor Carter and seconded by Council Member Latas to approve the proposed appointment process. Discussion followed regarding the current interview appoint process verses the proposed Council appointment process, results of the survey, volunteers' input, streamlining the current process and opportunity to move in a positive direction. MOTION failed, 3-4 with Mayor Loomis, Council Member Garner, Council Member Gillaspie, and Council Member Kunisch opposed. 02/18/09 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 7 Mayor Loomis recessed the meeting at 7:20 p.m. The meeting resumed at 7:25 p.m. 3. RESOLUTION NO. (R)09 - 12 ADOPTING THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PROPOSITION 207 POLICY RELATING TO LAND USE MATTERS Town Attorney Tobin Rosen reviewed background information relating to Proposition 207. He then presented highlights regarding the adoption of Resolution (R)09-12 and policy waivers as they would relate to land use matters under Proposition 207. MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Abbott and seconded by Council Member Kunisch to adopt Resolution (R)09-12 and to approve the proposed policy with regard to the application of Proposition 207 to land use decisions within the Town of Oro Valley and to direct staff to implement such policy. MOTION carried, 7-0. 5. CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING TRAVEL FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008/2009 Town Manager David Andrews reported that Council Members Abbott and Kunisch requested a discussion regarding the consideration to limit or suspend out-of-state travel. Council Members Latas and Gillaspie then requested that the discussion also include in-state travel. Discussion followed regarding: - Attendance at the National League Conference in Washington D.C. (Town's attendees will have opportunity to meet with Arizona State representatives). - Possible changes to current policy: If trip is going to exceed $1000, then the goal of the trip, how it affects Oro Valley, benefits, etc. should be provided before travel commences. - Provide transparency. - Council decided to not fund governmental lobbyists and have Town staff do the lobbying. - Trip reports are submitted and placed on the Consent Agenda. - Teleconferencing is a good option. - Current year's budget is balanced. - Opportunity to revise travel policy due to economic situation. No action taken. 02/18/09 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 8 4. CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING RESCHEDULING THE MARCH 18, 2009 COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING TO MARCH 25, 2009 MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Gillaspie and seconded by Council Member Latas to reschedule the March 18th Council regular meeting to March 25th. MOTION carried, 5-2 with Council Member Abbott and Council Member Kunisch opposed. 6. CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION TO RECONSIDER MODIFYING AND INCREASING THE ADOPTED FY 2008/09 TRAVEL BUDGET FOR MAYOR PAUL LOOMIS Council Member Gillaspie withdrew his request for consideration of the travel budget. No action necessary. 7. CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE APPROVAL TO MODIFY AND INCREASE THE ADOPTED FY 2008/09 TRAVEL BUDGET FOR MAYOR PAUL LOOMIS No action required. 8. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Council Member Abbott - Invite Russell Lowes to present at the next Study Session regarding nuclear energy and energy sustainability. Council Member Latas - For consideration: establishment of two new commissions: Economic Development Commission and Sustainability Commission. Seconded by Vice Mayor Carter. Council Member Kunisch - Bring back two separate policies regarding out-of- state and in-state travel. Seconded by Council Member Abbott. CALL TO AUDIENCE - No speakers ADJOURNMENT MOTION: A motion was made by Vice Mayor Carter and seconded by Council Member Kunisch to adjourn at 8:15 p.m. MOTION carried, 7-0. 02/18/09 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 9 Prepared by: Roxana Garrity, CMC Deputy Town Clerk I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the regular session of the Town of Oro Valley Council of Oro Valley, Arizona held on the 18th day of February 2009. I further certify that the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present. Dated this day of , 2009. Kathryn E. Cuvelier, CMC Town Clerk A MINUTES ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION March 4, 2009 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION CALL TO ORDER - at 5:00 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Paul Loomis, Mayor K.C. Carter, Vice Mayor Paula Abbott, Council Member Bill Garner, Council Member Barry Gillaspie, Council Member — by telephone Al Kunisch, Council Member Salette Latas, Council Member It was noted that Council Member Gillaspie would join the Executive Session by telephone until he arrived. MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Kunisch and seconded by Vice Mayor Carter to go into Executive Session at 5:02 p.m. to consult with legal counsel regarding the status of the Arroyo Grande Negotiations with the Arizona State Land Department MOTION carried, 6-0. EXECUTIVE SESSION MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Gillaspie and seconded by Council Member Kunisch to go out of Executive Session at 5:45 p.m. MOTION carried, 7-0. RESUME REGULAR SESSION CALL TO ORDER - at 6:01 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Paul Loomis, Mayor K.C. Carter, Vice Mayor Paula Abbott, Council Member • Bill Garner, Council Member Barry Gillaspie, Council Member 3/4/2009 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 2 Al Kunisch, Council Member Salette Latas, Council Member PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE — Mayor Loomis led the audience in the pledge of allegiance. UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS - Town Manager David Andrews reviewed the upcoming meetings. COUNCIL REPORTS - No reports. DEPARTMENT REPORTS — No reports. TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT - No report. ORDER OF BUSINESS: Mayor Loomis moved Item 5 before Item 3. CALL TO AUDIENCE Oro Valley resident Richard Tracy stated that regarding fire safety standards, he was opposed to the rumor that the standards would be changed. He requested personal notification should the item come forward in the future. PRESENTATIONS Pause for Paws Lane Davidson of the Foundation for Animals In Risk (FAIR) presented a 10 week old kitten named Pancake. She stated that the adoption fee of $99 included sterilization, microchip and vaccination. pp Plaque of Appreciation presented to General John Wickham US Army q (Retired) for his service as Oro Valley's representative to Regional Transportation Authority Citizen's Advisory Committee and the Committee on Accountability for Regional Transportation from 2005 - 2008 Pp Plaque of Appreciation presented to Donna Aversa for her service as Oro q p Valley's representative to the Tucson-Pima Bicycle Advisory Committee from December 2005 - December 2008 pp Plaques of Appreciation presented to Bart Schannep for his service on the q Board of Adjustment from November 2001 - December 2008 and Colleen Kessler for her service on the Board of Adjustment from June 2002 - December 2008 Mayor Loomis presented a Plaques of Appreciation to the following citizens and Y thanked them for their service: General John Wickham Donna Aversa Bart Schannep Colleen Kessler 3/4/2009 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 3 1. CONSENT AGENDA Council Members pulled items A, H and J MOTION: A motion was made by Vice Mayor Carter and seconded by Council Member Kunisch to approve the Consent Agenda with the exceptions of items p A, H and J. MOTION carried, 7-0. A. Minutes - January 21, 2009 MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Latas and seconded by Council Member Garner to approve the minutes as corrected. MOTION carried, 7-0. B. Building Safety Activity Report - January 2009 C. Police Department Monthly Report - January 2009 D. Mayor & Council Trip Reports - February 2009 E. Resolution No. (R) 09-13 Authorizing the Public Works Department to apply for a grant from the Arizona Department of Transportation for funding of vehicles for Coyote Run F. OV12-06-23 Approval of a final plat for a ten (10) lot subdivision known as the "Enclave at Desert Sky", located at 9797 N. Desert Sky Road G. Approval of request by Senator Al Melvin to use the Town Council Chambers for the purpose of holding a public meeting on Saturday, March 7, 2009 from 1:30 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. H. Appointment of Public Advisory Committee (PAC) Members and Acceptance of the Technical Advisory Committee for the Environmentally Sensitive Lands Ordinance project MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Latas and seconded by Council Member Gillaspie to approve Steve Solomon, Doug McKee, Steve Taillie, Chet Oldakowski, Bill Adler and Don Chatfield and direct Council Member Abbott to appoint a Town resident. Council Member Abbott explained that she nominated a Catalina resident as this issue will affect their area. She requested a friendly amendment to include that the Technical Advisory Committee meetings be open to the public. The amendment was not accepted. ‘1100 MOTION carried, 6-1 with Council Member Abbott opposed. 3/4/2009 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 4 I. Appointment of Gail Munden, Greater Oro Valley Arts Council (GOVAC) representative to the Art Review Commission with term effective March 4, 2009 - July 31, 2009 J. Appointment of Eugene Wowk to the Development Review Board for a pp g term commencing March 4, 2009 and subject to reappointment on July 31, 2009 MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Gillaspie and seconded by Council Member Kunisch to appoint Eugene Wowk to the Development Review Board for a term commencing March 4, 2009 through the regular term expiration date in two years. MOTION carried, 7-0. K. Appointment of Tom Bush as Oro Valley's representative to the Committee on Accountability for Regional Transportation 2. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION TO EXTEND THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY'S 2% LOCAL SALES TAX ON ELECTRICITY, NATURAL GAS AND WATER UTILITY SERVICES Finance Director StaceyLemos explained the revenue shortfalls in the amount of $5.2M which included the $1 .2M loss should the utility tax sunset. She discussed the: • Multiple losses in revenues. • Measures the Town Manager recommended to reduce the shortfall. • Utility tax was essential to reducing the deficit. • Town's sources of revenue were sensitive to the economy. She noted that the Utility tax was a stable, sustainable source of revenue. Ms. Lemos reviewed the recommendations from the Finance and Bond Committee: • Use 117th of the Contingency Fund to close the gap. • Review the contingency policy for this. • Renew the Utility Tax temporarily. • Study the Town's revenue sources. • Identify alternate revenue sources. • Extend the 2% Utility Sales tax Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. The following Oro Valley residents spoke in favor of extending the Utility tax: Marc Adams Bob Milkey Joe Hornat Richard Tracy Wes Helvig Daniela Andresen Lindsay Ortiz Diane Little Mary Snider Bill Adler 3/4/2009 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 5 Kevin Mattocks, Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 53 Vice President and non-resident The following Oro Valley residents spoke in opposition of the Utility tax: John Musolf Art Segal Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 53 Vice President and non-resident Kevin Mattocks spoke in favor of extending the Utility tax. MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Kunisch and seconded by Council Member Gillaspie to approve the renewal of the Town's current 2% utility sales tax on water, natural gas and electricity services. MOTION carried, 4-3 with Vice Mayor Carter, Council Member Abbott, and Council Member Garner opposed. Council Member Abbott stated that she was opposed to the tax as she did not feel that the belt was tight enough yet. She expressed support for taking money from the Contingency Fund to make up the shortfall. Mayor Loomis called for a recess at 6:53 p.m. The meeting resumed at 6:59 p.m. 5. DISCUSSION OF TOWN FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY INCLUDING CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE APPROVAL OF TOWN ORGANIZATIONAL RESTRUCTURING AND REDUCTION-IN- FORCE PLAN Town Manager David Andrews stated that the passage of the Utility tax renewal aided in addressing the revenue shortfall. He identified the causes for the shortfall: • Sunset of the 2% Utility tax • Decreased construction activity in the amount of $1M • Decreased State shared revenues of $1.2M • Recession in the economy He stated that his recommendations were meant to enhance revenues and cut costs. He recommended: • Organizational restructuring o Reduction in force plan o Net savings of $1.5M o Eliminating 27 positions • Use Bed Tax revenues that were earmarked for the failed Naranja Town Site Park bond. • Renewal of Utility Sales tax • Eliminate $300,000 from Operations and Maintenance to include: o Out of state travel 4111111. o Consultants 3/4/2009 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 6 • DeferringCapitalImprovement Im rovement Projects for FY 09/10 and possibly FY 10/11 • One time expenditures of $500,000 • 6police officer positions contingent on a grant from the U.S. Department of Justice He noted that: • Initially he recommended 33 positions be eliminated • 6 positions remain vacant due to the hiring freeze • There were two options for severance pay • This recommendation was not a result of any employee's performance o 75% of the Town's expenditures were pay and benefits. Discussion clarified the following: • The deficit from the General fund in January was $4.2M o The Highway fund numbers were not available • Has a deficit of $IM • Lifting the hiring freeze was not part of the motion for this item • Reclassifications were meant to compensate employees that would have to perform the duties of positions that were cut • Department heads reviewed areas to cut spending o Not enough to close the gap o Warranted eliminating positions o Each department had to cut position(s) • Thepp rant application for the police officer's positions would take six weeks to g process o The grant would fund the officers' salaries for three years o The Town could be required to retain the officers at the Town's expense at the end of that time • Officers removed from calls facilitated a reduction in traffic accidents and incidents Mayor Loomis opened the floor for public comment. Oro Valley resident John Musolf stated that he was opposed to Staff reductions. Oro Valley Lyra ra Done stated that she was opposed to reductions in Staff y and wanted the officers funded. She recommended cuts in salaries so that employees would remain employed. Oro Valley resident Richard Tracy stated that he was opposed to cutting law enforcement. Oro Valley resident Joe Hornat stated his support for public safety. He noted that he would rather see employees take pay cuts than lose jobs. Oro Valley officer Kevin Mattocks stated that he supported services and was opposed to layoffs. Oro Valley resident Steve Sicklebower stated that he was opposed to decreasing 3/4/2009 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 7 the work force in the police department. Oro Valley Officer Megan St. John stated that she was a member of the Community Action Team. She stated her opposition to the reduction in force. Oro Valley School Resource Officer Bruce Thomas noted that the police department was fully staffed and suggested that the reductions be made through attrition. John Cocco of Sanofi Aventis stated that Oro Valley employees helped to make their building a quality building. He urged Council not to reduce Staff. Beth Koch of Sanofi Aventis urged Council not to reduce Staff. She stated that the Town has great people that make it worthwhile and the community that it is. Oro Valley resident Chuck Hofbauer stated that he was opposed to layoffs in the police department. Oro Valley resident Wes Helvig urged Council to research Town funds to avoid a reduction in force of 27 employees. Oro Valley resident Mary Snider requested that this item be further reviewed noting that the Town has dedicated employees. She urged Council to review essential vs. non-essential services and wanted the police officers retained regardless of funding. Oro Valley resident Kara Sicklebower stated her opposition to a reduction in police officers. Oro Valley resident Robert Schumann stated that the two best things about Oro Valley were the view of the mountains and the library. He stated that wanted funding for the library increased. Oro Valley resident Bill Adler stated his opposition to the layoffs. He stated that he would rather see the Utility Sales tax doubled. He noted that he was opposed to the use of Contingency funds to cover the shortfall. Oro Valley resident Steve Solomon stated that he was proud to be a resident due to the services. He noted that the Town has established a Staff that provided excellent customer service and that funds should be used to retain skilled employees. Oro Valley resident Sandy Pacheco stated that the police department arrived at her place of business in 13 seconds and saved her life during an armed robbery. She stated her support for increasing taxes to retain officers. Oro Valley Terry Parish stated that all of the positions had contributed to the excellence of the Town. He stated that the Contingency fund was meant for a time like this. He urged Council to stand up for the employees, freeze raises and keep officers in the schools to protect children. 3/4/2009 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 8 Oro Valley resident Melanie Larson stated that people out of work need places to go and that hours of operation for the library and parks should not be reduced. p She concurred that the Contingency Fund should be used to maintain service levels. Discussion noted the following: • Direction wasg iven to directors to make cuts in staff for each department. • The Municipal Operations Complex was not included • Capital Improvement Projects would be deferred for 1-2 years • Each department reviewed areas to cut in operations and maintenance. • Cuts had been made to the Oro Valley Vista Newsletter. • Recession is projected to be long term Mayor Loomis clarified that the Town revenues were derived from sales tax, State shared revenues from income tax and State tax. He noted that the State shared revenues lagged two years behind. He explained that the Oro Valley Marketplace was ket lace anticipated to do better than it has. He stated that in the next 3 p years the Town's State shared revenues will be down. It was noted that: • The Hilton El Conquistador's revenues were down 20%. • Layoffs in the police department were not part of this proposal. • The largest est Staff reductions were in Development Services, due to the lack of growth. • The long term must be considered with respect to the Contingency Fund. Council Member Kunisch stated that he could not support the reclassifications. Council Member Gillaspie stated that the Town ran leaner than other municipalities alities and was well run. He stated that it was important to protect the long term. He noted that if services were cut and parks and the library were shut down, the Town will not recover. Council Member Garner noted that each department had to make cuts and the police department would not have made any cuts if the grant is awarded. Chief Sharp stated the following: • He chose to cut a single program rather than cripple several programs. • Theg rant would cover salaries and benefits for those positions. o The details of the grant were still unclear. • 95p ositions in the Police department were funded by the General Fund. o Remaining positions were funded from other sources of revenue. Human Resources Director Sandra Abbey stated that the attrition rate of 8-9% projected for next year was based on the attrition rate of previous years. J Council Member Abbott stated that the positions recommended for layoffs should be reconsidered. She requested that furloughs and salary reductions be investigated. She noted that she was opposed to reclassifications. She stated 3/4/2009 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 9 that the Contingency fund should be considered only after all other sources have been exhausted. She recommended further reductions to out of state travel beginning with Council. Mayor Loomis stated his concern that the plan did not identify programs the that would be impacted. He noted the items he anticipated seeing in the recommended budget from the Manager on April 1, 2009: • Identify essential versus non-essential jobs • Anticipated attrition for the coming year • Continuation of the hiring freeze • Elimination of recreation and aquatic programs • Reduction of library programs • Reduction or elimination of Community funding He noted that the Town was required to balance the budget and do so with a zero growth level. He stated that the budget could not be balanced without reducing the workforce. MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Kunisch and seconded by Mayor Loomis to table the item until the recommended budget has been reviewed by Council. MOTION failed, 3-4 with Vice Mayor Carter, Council Member Garner, Council Member Gillaspie, and Council Member Latas opposed. CI& MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Latas and seconded by Council Member Gillaspie to approve the Town Manager's Organizational Restructuring and Reduction in Force Plan to include severance packages of 60 days for those employees with less than 5 years of service and 90 days severance packages for those employees with 5 years or more of service. AMENDMENT TO THE ORIGINAL MOTION: A motion was made by Vice Mayor Carter and seconded by Council Member Garner to amend the motion to include the six police officers positions for a total of 33 positions eliminated. AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION failed, 3-4 with Mayor Loomis, Council Member Abbott, Council Member Kunisch, and Council Member Latas opposed. ORIGINAL MOTION failed, 3-4 with Mayor Loomis, Vice Mayor Carter, Council Member Abbott, and Council Member Kunisch opposed. Mayor Loomis called for a recess at 9:01 p.m. The meeting resumed at 9:13 p.m. 3. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE (0)09- 02 OV3-08-11 REQUEST TO EXEMPT INNOVATION CORPORATE CENTER-EAST, LOCATED ON LOTS 1 THROUGH 6, RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD THREE, FROM THE RANCHO VISTOSO PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT SIGN GUIDELINES AND TO HAVE THAT DEVELOPMENT BE REGULATED 3/4/2009 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 10 UNDER THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED, CHAPTER 28, SIGNS Assistant Planningand Zoning Director Paul Popelka discussed the amendment brought forth for this project. He stated that: • The design deviated from Rancho Vistoso standards • Other pad exemptions exist within the area • The Development Review Board recommended approval by 4-0 vote • Staff recommended approval Stephen French of Effective Signs stated that he represented Venture West's project at Innovation Park. He explained that the parcel was 10 acres and had 2 entrances and exits. He stated that the directory signs were small. Discussion noted that: • The signs would not be illuminated • Logos were allowed for registered trademarks only. Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. Tucson resident Sherree Mongelli spoke about the numerous meetings that had been conducted over the last nine months. Mayor Loomis closed the public hearing. MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Gillaspie and seconded by Vice Mayor Carter to approve Ordinance (0)09-02, OV3-08-11, Effective Signs representing Innovation Corporate Center, LLC., approval of a PAD Exemption for Innovation Corporate Center East, Lots 1-6, Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood3, Innovation Corporate Center-East, located NE of the intersection of Innovation Park Drive and Tangerine Road. MOTION carried, 7-0. 4. PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION NO. (R)09-14 OV8-08-01, GRANTING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ENTERPRISE LEASING AGENCY, LOCATED WITHIN LOT 3 OF CAPIN CAR CARE CENTER IN THE PROXIMITY OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ORACLE ROAD AND COOL DRIVE, PARCEL NO. 225- 141-90C Ann Delcastillo of Enterprise Rent-A-Car stated that they would like to move to the new location that would be near a car wash and have better access. She clarified that they were not open for business on Sundays. Property owner Neil Capin stated that the business would not interfere with p Y parking for the restaurant onsite. Assistant Planning and Zoning Director Paul Popelka stated that the ti 3/4/2009 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 11 business was a compatible use for the property. He noted that a neighborhood meeting was held however there were no attendees. He stated that Staff recommended approval. Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. Tucson resident Donny Cathey stated that it was a win-win situation for all concerned. He explained that his business was next door to Enterprise Rent-A- Car's current location and that he wanted to expand his store. He urged Council to approve the item. Mayor Loomis closed the public hearing. MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Gillaspie and seconded by Council Member Kunisch to adopt Resolution No. (R) 09-14, OV8-08-01, approval of a conditional use permit for the Enterprise Rental Car facility, located in proximity to the northwest corner of Oracle Road and Cool Drive. MOTION carried, 7-0. 6. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Vice Mayor Carter requested that an item regarding amending the Parliamentary Rules and Procedures and limiting Council Member debate to 5 minutes unless notified ahead of time be added to the March 25, 2009 agenda. Council Member Kunisch seconded the item. CALL TO AUDIENCE — No speakers. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: A motion was made by Vice Mayor Carter and seconded by Council Member Kunisch to adjourn the meeting at 9:38 p.m. MOTION carried, 7-0. Prepared by: Christina Pickering Senior Office Specialist I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the regular session of the Town of Oro Valley Council of Oro Valley, 3/4/2009 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 12 Arizona held on the 4th day of March 2009. I further certify that the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present. Dated this day of , 2009. Kathryn E. Cuvelier, CMC Town Clerk 0•_ N .; U) C N O Q U O Q CC • 0 coN Q C Q E. L_ 5 Q Q El ■ ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ■ ❑ 1.111.11111..1.11t F _ r, o? 0cb �G� Q J0� NOMMil • •_� 0G) 4.1O moorE E PJ NEWo ■ ■_111 ■ O9' PQ 00 \� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 11) �t M M N N �-- Q D To O C � \J \/ U- m U) N N co "> '> fi 0 N a) d) fi 8- Ce Ce Q co cu a) O C 2 - O • a `C U N - CO— m c+►) Opp N o e-. OO vs �� � ■_ N }+ OCG a 2 M 1 < .. Jo�O 0 93 O N CtQ.9)N d'c N d' _ ")CU 0. i (tZic, N M U) co N _ OO M 0) ONNEMMIMMIIIMIIIIIMEI ��i N Ob •aJc< N ` CO 0 O N J CO M _ OO �� l(') M Lo Lo (0 N _ Oo vszC M .........ammiiiimmiumml d''' i N _ OO rn ‘Z ch LII N - O I �O on O� ao O O O O .1!„..111111111 O O O o M M N Nin o Lo Ne ,, ,,,,o• 9,� O it,. I' ..,‘ E ,,, # t_ •_-7o ',, Q� k. • 0 . , ,§) �,,vI _ -,- 09) :T. to IP W M, C§) = o0 E E ' , O U o�' 4s 0, ,,,„,:, CO Qc P k` 09) .Q, e, o O O O O O o O O O O o O O O O O o O O O O O 00 I` Cfl M N <0- CI (/) —.F.1.11.11.I',.-',-.-',', IMIIIIII.11--- ,, ,Q,C)c:5 < 1_1). i , „,,,-,,,,,,,,,,,„„,„.,,,,,,,.. , , ,,, (<,?,(4 ■ ❑ tY o� . ,o��r:' ::::::::4,,,,,i:-.7. +�}��.+r� � ` Will O9) _ Q z li i,, d"e 4 a g'" a v Rill. ,; ,;. °' ay,4;41;... ,;*a;':„,' '"` O O' n<zi ('MVV IF.' — ' ,cb II Ob J riMillill lib O� QQ IIIIcP� �a �o� MIMIMIOMIIMIIIIINMIMIIMIMIII M N 00 00 it) O N r- r- Op 9S6�i �� E O✓ 00.62, .\' 93 O , 00•X96`S Oec 9$ co 0 4 1 Op 98 p(8n of cK Q Ii 00.8 Nr a-+ o 9 I O 93 M 0 oO•��0`8z szQ 4-• 0 a) (13 LL Orb _I 0) 00'i i„,p8 \O O z $ N CD cg .1 9)O Ce 4--, a) b pi•04,,0 .c\' U) w 1 C 00•6SS, �� ct CO 093 00.8(; `, c' U O. ii O O 93 aa)) 00.6 ��' 0 89 Ps $ O 00-0) ' Orb 'Iris. <<e, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o di o o 0 to ci 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Ln 0 6 C a , o ,, C , I I , ,, Ci I 1 , n r 00 Efl Ef3 69 Ef} ;,;. �` Q1 ,c/) Q) O ip O p 11 IV!ti,,, O i •a 1 c O C 4 c (13Ii I — I R Q) a rn 1 c) ! , oo) t Q ! i I 1 cj E& E� EA Eft ? f C7 a / � (3) i a) rn O (13 o I Ocn o O ' o f I o p co I` ,- M 7t' M p O N in c0 d- N ti (N O CO to . cv M N r- O O i i E co r- M e- C 2 XI a) M In in l� O a,, c0 0 if) CO l l i -p .0 1 M a) M >, ' (A EA EA (A H4 N,E a rn ch . 0, nt I rn o d: N CD 0) 1- N M C7 c") O N N CO o 4 N- N N •N co co• Q C a) Oi co I- a) N Q) ! M < ^ o C O r- * O LL C N- N M CO a) CO r- N C) "O N N- O co N 3 Ce CIDCO N 11111111101 Ef? ea 69 Eft ro ; , i C 004, 1N o Q o O p Lr) N O Ln to O 8 .a. c co N- CO M O CD v c c t C L2 O Ls) 2 1 N ^ c O U ),-- -, V CO COO ,N-- O� C , co O CO '- CO 0) co �n 0) 0L -� fl.00 In COM 0 M d' N i LL d i - I , 7 a) •, N Q W 1 E I . Ef} E� 69 (39- Eft O I ' LI'. C :N o C E N I�1C. 1. 00 CO tt• O M CO ' SIP° - 0 °° O CO O t1� t!? Lt') 6 C 0) �- O CO CO C , ',' 0 r.;., o0 > N 10 V- C) Ne- i ° > I� Ln M M O Z CD i 0a) 0 cc ,- co ti a 0 7t- M co co d- p � } Z Z ct 'd' N o f ff 1 t/1 • Efl Ef} Ef3 Ef? Ef? I C 1 o v ) � o0 MpMit) COa7 � O O O o `> 1 4 I— i . (sDco Z t 00 O zV ,- ,- l Ix! oM ZOO ti N- i- 0) CO O • s On N- oo NM (39 El, EA (A EA c M 1 " `• ti Lf) CO v p N ,:t• CO C) O co �00 o 1- ����>����aOU oN 0) (C). 1t %-: O L. CO oM0 7) Lti) CCO s -61 U Ln N ine- - - — ', , i i , 041 fit' 7,t- r' r- � 1 ' € Ln oo EA Eft Eft EA-Eft j 1 OO 4 0( O lei;)) 0 i L N co to In �t co ' M� CO CO CO 0) 7t' O c g a ! co N a �: 1 r- �- U) CO N r- In O 1 d' a) O Q a) — CO N I = N CO co co a) o 1 t x, a� r- Q 'C d' t` E (n co co Eft Eft Ef} 69 Ef< c) d 1 fi co `') c) r o p N r N N ,- N j CO m O co co co cocoI ,,,.,..,...'::•,,,,..!:‘,,,,,,,,,‘"tF D O c� 00 N CO• N cG• r- r- r- 1-- r- r-- N , o = ti ,-- r- Q — Co) a7 In t1") Q -, 00 r- CO N -, a) a) a) in Ln E ^ t N N N C Q i 0 , (A Ef} (A EA-Eft q) T..• co -0 (Y) N O • ao V) if-) ` C) C) a) I -- L L O 0) g Cl) N cL X C ^ O C C = CD Z = C Z C) C) W _o i- -� 0 N 0 O o O X X fC 0 > O O CD O W = O MI cC O LC) I W W O Sl LL., LU 0 O O 0 I ; V1 N H a. a. %lip, 0 _ N co 0 0 0 .-- �-- C C) ;_, 0 L 0 00 CD •Kt- N 0 0 0 , G d. 0.. >- >- >- c O >-- >- 1.,.._ Eft El) E!3 Eft G O H } LL } L 0t r k t a*,r e e,, 3.t,t s S F7+its '3 s , _ le z_ , �y,s M1�a;r '�7�rE 8'',34.14.5114 T y . a .r � �® VaikEY Q,4JP`` -,/- °4-,at_i_ft:04PLICEk, L , . D .\,,, - ff _. :,,,,440. _ DANIEL G. SHARP ......_.:;,__., ..- CHIEF OF POLICE LANDED�g1 MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor Paul Loomis & Oro Valley Council Members FROM: Chief Daniel G. Sharp REF: February 2009 Statistics DATE: March 13, 2009 Please find attached the captured statistics for the Oro Valley Police Department for February 2009 plus Citation/Warning totals for the previous month. Also included are the response times Cw for dispatched priority 1-4 calls and a historical review of the past three years of statistics for the month captured. VW 11000 N. La Canada Drive • Oro Valley, AZ 85737 Phone 520-229-4900 • Fax 520-229-4979 • www.ovpd.org - U W 41.1F i........... I IC1'4 I a, .4‹ ................ I _ , r T i, L Ir V O U Cr W O ciE-0 .........., _ , . , • 0, 44-P 0 EIMI* ....4.4.44, , ' , , L Co) ,--) O .14t fr---, o 4 c CS) v Z Q a, -1 - O o M �-' a, v 0 ......... - , . , ' ▪.C.3 ° A* ›:., "' L-) 0 '0 a .i N l .3 O c:4 zc E 111111r Q, O : E'"'"1 --...., , a., , , , , p- , , O 02 • .z U _ , , A., ,____, Q., O p4 _ , _ O ,_, CN co LCD 00 cc LC) O O N 00 N+ O (O Ln C� C� * r-I CO 0") LCD N- -.7P cc CY) LCDa,), C3)= r.,9 cYD Cr.) r--4 .-4 r-! ['--- 00 ["-- N N- �' at � r-1 CY CY) N- ,--i '-i .-� .-� r--t • r-1 _ LCA .-+ ) -Q �, r N O v �' ;.T.11 4' O >. C.0) , co cfl O co co N 0 0 O 0-) N C) N0 CD Cc N CO O CO^ CD LO d' N- 0 cc Ln O C Z cc C`'c r-+ N 0) 11) Ln CY) .---i 0 �'' C') O 00 C� Cc N cc -� cc N N- LI)*4 < '-' _ CD N -71-, i LCYD O O ® O N.0 CX) 00 r-+ � CO � � 00 � Q 0 ,--�+ 0 *-i N CO .--� 00 T--4�C j ,--+ CD in v--�+� ._._._--+ C 7 N t`- � •v � N N- NV N I.C) N CO M O) 0 N. CO 00 r-i Cr) 00 •-1 O < N. - co r-+ r--+ Co [� O N r' T-+ Cr) N '� 4 H • ,--+ r-4 C'� O O v 44 o Q., Q, , - .' . :-•• ... . _.-._ . . -.. i-r - ,... ...... *4 _ _ . ... _____ 4 •.............................................. lz C3 C.) 1.4 ---.. 0 O L fj M Q 0) Ccli , CU P4 .5C CJ 0 Q ' 0 ° &., , o * ci.) ro N 0cn 0 . in c,. . �(7) •(7, 0 7,04 $_. v,..... ct, . . U U Z aa ..v o o cw . U W O X H U O a IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII w 4 C/D E� C. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII< El* * Z � .. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII PIT4 s--, Emi = z w.4 1111111111111111 � � o ;:;NT,4 E.* -.J IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII co0 C C P4 00 11111111111111111 •z---, CO P* 4 <, c i ICur 1Z1 40 w ..4 II, w O W E.:: IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII )-4 w aC rn cv 0) cY) o -dr o CO ,-4 cY) a) c\I o) .� o Ln cY,' g Q � .-+ N [ � O M ti hal Oa H .- -a .-i N N CY) Fid 4O I z o Z °' o H � Z Q o z o u' •° � ,..._1 > z � o w � ? o �, 0 � E-� > p W C7 � � � > U O Q x W � < O > +� �' � � U � '� c�i� 0 O � Cz.7 � .tea W W Z W � � W z � � � z � � � W �" � Z � H U z � �a cin w Q .:a � � Q a � w o o N "' o � � w a ¢ w � � w x o' ¢ � a o H cn z �a r� r� x cn .� r� up (.. v) c� w a �.a ¢ E-� r cd Cn r---1 LCD LI-DI ..., c ,,,.y..-, N 0,-) U-D. _, (1.D _._, CD C: -:___, N-- ;Sc, L,,... (..,,] LC [---...'77: :- c7.) ,H r,-----; Cr:.,,,,--: ' CO 00 N 11) N- N �., O C� 00 CO r--+ O L,- N O ,..4N O L� ,-� ,--i c� in C° N r--4 O di O r-1 T-4 OeD In 00 N r-+ 1.---1 r--+ N O0 r--i N ,---ir--4 r--1 NOU r--4 00 � o co6) Ln � Nd-' � OO OONOOO �- NN � r-� CqSNOc� O0 �- '' � O U) LL. Ca (0 (0 (I) li r� C C' _ , O o0 � � � .-4 � � OO ,� o NCfl � oor-� c� U) Cfl � � � �—+ c� NN. � C CU 0 Cum V N CD C�') Cn N ,--�Cq NA gp_ O RN di r� ,--i 2OO N ••- .`n r--i r--a N -Dv.) cu , Ce cq CN cv cv a 1—IiiS ti `✓; aJ O �"" co c u SD i J Q c, o N Q 0 i Z c co LCD 0 Q ooN ,---� oo �' � °' or-+ ° cfl000c� � � o �no CN N- Cr) C5) v) �• N N r--� di C� N N °. d-+ r--•1 ON LCD r--1 '�+ N r—I h4•Q CO p ti N O cn •� �c a) = a) L ca 4' Q • f O .Q C 0 cn O L. L ..c 1^ L 4, u✓ -F., oin O c� 00 O� Ln CO O �' ,--1 N O c° N- �+ r•-, r--� +° z� a� I O r-- N O r--4 d-+ C-- c,0 O '---I N N- Cn N- 00 Ln 00 d-+ CN O Ln Ln (:)- cY) r--1 N- - .�' u e9 c\I c\I ' cY)ti ; ',;) N O -� QJ V Q CO to -' C -+- +� co cu u N _E l., , o i� 40 * �Cf) Cf) , U U) m C Q C * -4 U? Q O LI)_ -) U) 0 U a" tcci •� •� +) U o U (A "V al i o=no %IMP ,_, - ,4-4 U -� �--; v,----Iczi 4 ) cc-.1 , cK1ca., U " < Q) , •— - co o co Q Q-, 73 as CCI -' ''C '''--4 .C.74 .':-1 ..i 0 .- 1:3' Lo- 0 0 V) 0 V) C'j Cil Cn ." 0 .-'-' cl; Q) (1) ccl > > ›----4 46 Ft if rti E-1_C:Q_H_< :2-1 r: < H < -*Cs < a: < 3 c4 0UU1417 . OO [- CO O0 [''- CO CC GCC cs74 V In coC� 00 a) in Cfl U COO ,--4 cD Lo (. Q) T If)4.,, In LC) In �,,, N r--4 ,-4 • it P (.0 00 it H. N- (I) U) U ),,, v) rn l ' v0 u) Q) a� a� 0 �j Q) .i_...) ..., 4._.> ...._> a -5 4-3' --' -+3) a E 2 rzl , = to -— ---- . ci) E E . (.") --• •- Z a) a) a) a) o d' OOOO COQ COQ CNN cd V A iN � \./ " -/ fir V A V A 0 , H •, V / �/ / 0 - '‹ CD O a) _E a) rz G a > ro . 100..4 CH lillir 0 p1.4 _01%-4 ,...._ & & & , ....._ _ _ _ _ * & ,y, ..f.,,,:, * e.,,, ,_____ GocOLOLCD � cfl 0-) r--BOO (0 W W "rt < t) -7P C\1 _4., a) LCD �,,,., N .--i E> 0 r-+ '� vi..a T d- N sa; 4u K), �..� ••-• it it H N cu v) u, ',' - a) a) a) a) 0 = - cp cu 0 cn cn . Q) a) cn v) v) a a a.� . a•�_ ---. ., ▪EEEE � �n EES v--4 *-� r-, �r � � � n ` LnL0OO � , V A V A O + V A V A Q V A aE v) -- U � .----1U a) a > a, > cd O U O • H H Q H H R . TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Page 1 of 1 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETINGDATE: APRIL 1, 2009 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: Philip C. Saletta, P.E. Water Utility Director Shirley Seng, Water Utility Administrator SUBJECT: Report on Meter Reader Supervisor and Meter Replacement Program p g SUMMARY: At the February 4, 2009 Town Council that Council Member Garner requested q Water Utility Staff report on the Meter Reader Supervisor position and the Meter r Replacement Program.gam. His motion was seconded by Council Member Abbott. The Town Council approved the new ery position of Meter Reader Supervisor with the adoption po f the FY 2008-09 budget for the Water Utility. This position was filled by an internal applicant in September pp p ber 2008. The meter replacement program is important for the Water Utility for several reasons. Replacement p t of old meters that are no longer accurately measuring water flow will result in increased revenue. Additionally, the Utility must accurately track water use for annual reporting to the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR). Co The attached report will detail the Meter Reader Supervisor responsibilities and achievements s over the past 6 months and the status of the Meter Replacement Program. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Report on Meter Reader Supervisor Position and Meter Replacement Program MOTION: I move to approve the Report on the Meter Reader Supervisor Position and Meter Replacement Program. p g Or I move to yt,,,, ,, , Shirle Seng, Wate Utilit Admi istrator ...4, Philip C. Sala, P.E., Water Utility Director gip' N'��s .. .•..mn.r+Mna�b rye" f11►pl+�/r" � .rr.,u�.e 1- ..tiro...y�*a.y��rr .David Andrews, Town Manager' --\ DATE: March 16, 2009 TO: Honorable Mayor and Council FROM: Philip C. Saletta, P.E., Water Utility Director Shirley Seng, Water Utility Administrator Bobby Drew, Meter Reader Supervisor SUBJECT: Report on Meter Reader Supervisor and Meter Replacement Program Meter Reader Supervisor The Town Council approved the new position of Meter Reader Supervisor with the adoption of the FY 2008-09 budget for the Water Utility. This position was filled by an internal applicant in September 2008. The primary responsibilities for this position include: ➢ Supervision of 5 meter reading personnel - all Certified Water Operators ➢ Implementation of the Meter Replacement program ➢ Implementation of the Automated Meter Reading program ➢ Meter route sequencing and assignments ➢ Coordination of electronic data transfer to/from meter reading equipment on a bi- weekly basis ➢ Budget administration for the meters division ➢ Purchasing/inventory of meters and related materials and supplies ➢ Assigns and prioritizes daily work assignments ➢ Responds to customer inquiries and related work orders ➢ Assists with meter installation and meter reading as necessary ➢ Maintains a Grade 2 Water Operator Certification The Meter Reader Supervisor (Supervisor) has accomplished numerous objectives. The Supervisor is in the process of updating data in our billing data base that will facilitate the replacement program. This is extremely labor intensive and will take approximately 1y ear to accomplish. Since July 1, 2008, meters personnel have replaced 275 malfunctioning meters after checking the accuracy of meters with unusual or low water use that have been discovered while meter reading. The Supervisor tracks all meter replacements and analyzes the water use 3 months prior to the replacement compared to water use 3 months following the replacement. p More detailed information on the meter replacements may found in that section of this report. Additionally, the Supervisor oversaw the replacement of 286 meters in the Highlands Subdivision as part of a water main replacement project in FY 2008-09. These meters are the first meters to be installed with Automated Meter Reading (AMR) equipment. Once the GPS coordinants have been entered into the billing software, the meters will be read automatically with a laptop computer placed in a vehicle. The length of time to read the AMR meters will be reduced from 4 - 5 hours to approximately 15 minutes. This will increase time available for meter replacements and increases customer service and response time. Other areas will be retro- fitted with AMR equipment with priorities based on safety concerns and labor reduction factors. Any new connections to the water system will be installed with AMR equipment. The cost of - 1 - new metered connections including AMR equipment is borne bythedeveloper of that p Ler subdivision or commercial facility. The Supervisor investigated different types of meters typically used for commercial facilities. cuities. Based on the findings, all commercial meters installed in the Oro ValleyMarket Place are Omni mni meters. These meters can be tested without disconnecting water service. The register within an Omni meter stores water flow data for 1 year that can be easilyretrieved. Additionally, the . y� Omni meter measures low flow as well as high flow similar to a compound meter. A traditional compound meter does not store water flow data and water service must be disconnected for testing. A data base has been created for the Oro Valley Market Place accounts and flow testing will be performed annually. Omni meters will be installed for all future commercial meters that need to be replaced. The Meter Reader Supervisor has recently re-designed the meter reading routes for more efficient reading. He has also re-assigned personnel and meter routes so that allP ersonnel are now familiar with the entire service area. These changes, along with the current staffing level, g have resulted in meters personnel resuming work activities that were being done by the Customer Service and Distribution Divisions because of previously lower staffing levels in the Meters Division. These changes have resulted in increased productivity, customer service and improved morale in the Meters Division. In addition to meter reading, all Meter Readers are Certified Water Operators and can perform numerous tasks on the Water Distribution System. Meter Replacement Program Implementation of the meter replacement program is important for the Water Utilityfor several p reasons. The average life of a water meter is 10 to 15 years. As meters age, they wear out and under register water flow which result in inaccurate lower readings and lost revenues. Replacement of old meters that are no longer accurately measuring water flow will result in accurate accounting of water use and increased revenues. The Utility must accurately track water use for annual reporting to the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR). The Utility is allowed up to 10% lost and unaccounted for water annually. For 2007, the Utility's lost and unaccounted for water was 7.75% and in 2008 it was 7.99%. This loss is not solely due to malfunctioning meters, but these meters are definitely a large contributor to the loss. The ADWR has also identified the implementation of a Meter Replacement Program as one of its approved Best Management Practices for water conservation. As stated earlier in this report, the Supervisor is in the process of updating data in the billing data base that will facilitate the replacement program. Data in over 18,300 accounts must be edited in order to begin a methodical replacement program. Once completed, a time frame for all water meters in each subdivision and commercial facility within the water service area will be identified and scheduled for replacement. The replacement of water meters will be an on-going program as the water system continues to age. Since the beginning of this fiscal year (July 2008), a total of 561 meters have been replaced. This includes 286 meters in the Highlands Subdivision. All but 3 of these meters are single family residential meters sizes 5/8 x 3/4-inch and 3/4 x 3/4-inch. The remaining 3 meters ‘rnor included two 1.5-inch commercial meters and one 6-inch meter for La Cholla Air Park. The tracking of water use for 175 of these 561 meters for 3 months prior to meter replacement -2 - i • \O compared to 3 months after meter replacement has resulted in an additional 3,140, 00 gallons of ‘Iiir water being billed. This translates to $9,334.55 in increased water sales revenue and $1,256.00 in increased Groundwater Preservation Fees collected. The increase in revenue for one year, from these 175 meters alone, is projected to be approximately $42 000. . pP y Furthermore, the replacement of malfunctioning meters will continue to increase revenues in subsequent q t years as compared to revenue generated from older, inaccurate meters. The Meter Replacement Program p gam also minimizes potential lost and accounted for water reported to ADWR. Our analysis pwill be updated quarterly for all remaining meters replaced once a full 3 months of data is available iliisr -3 - LEY q lIAR 1?'B9M1i:25 TOV -57 Office of the Mayor &Town Council Trip Report Purpose: 2009 League Conference Brainstorming Session League of Arizona Cities & Towns Date: March 4, 2009 Location: League of Arizona Cities & Towns Office 1820 W Washington Phoenix AZ 85007 Attendees: Mayor Paul Loomis Summary: Mayor Loomis attended the 2009 League Conference Brainstorming Session. The purpose of meeting was to brainstorm ideas so that staff can move forward with the logistical details of the event. Agenda attached. Meeting materials are available for review from Carol Miller. Report submitted Town Clerk on March 17, 2009. Paul Loomis Mayor IOW F:\Admin AssistMa or Loomis Out of Town Travel-Trip Reports\2009 League Conference Brainstorming Session 3-4-09.doc www.orovalleyaz.gov Oro Valley Administration Building 11000 N.La Canada Drive • Oro Valley,Arizona 85737 phone:(520)229-4700 • fax:(520)297-0428 , .. y .Y League of Arizona -_3, ; rye 0,01._ • 1820 IV Washington•Phoenix,AZ 85007•Phone:(602)258-5786•Fax:(602)253-3874 .- CitiesEmail:league�I.azleague.org•Web site:wwwazlea ue.org AND � 2009 CONFERENCE BRAINSTORMING SESSION MEETING AGENDA Wednesday, March 4, 11:30 am League Office 1. Introductions 2. Conference Overview 3. Concurrent Workshop and Stand Alone Session Ideas and Suggestions 4. General Session and Keynote Speaker Ideas and Suggestions tor 5. Discussion of re-naming and re-tooling Festival of Cities 6. Sponsorship/Conference Finances 7. Other Items 8. Adjourn 0 A cf.A.i AA,,fi-9•7"-... TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Page 1 of 2 'COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONlbw METING DATE: April 01, 2009 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: AIMEE RAMSEY, TRANSIT SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR SUBJECT: Resolution No. (R) 09- 17 A resolution of the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, Authorizing and Approving an Intergovernmental Agreement between the Regional Transportation Authority of Pima County and the Town of Oro Valley for provision of circulator bus service. SUMMARY: The Intergovernmental Agreement before you this evening will facilitate the delivery of one of the transit components identified in the Regional Transportation Plan("the Plan") approved by voters in May 2006. The RTA and Town staff have been working diligently to bring the "Sun Shuttle"to the Oro Valley community. The recommended transit service provides connections to important community activity centers, employment generators and the new park-and-ride facility. This service complements and will work with the other regional transit systems providing seamless transit options. PROJECT OVERVIEW: ce hdevelopment of a regional public transit network has been in the works for quite some time. The two viated-fixed route services will provide regional connectivity, in-town circulation and future regional fares ty g and technology to ensure seamlessness. Service characteristics include: • Monday through Friday service from 6:00 am until 7:00 pm; • Saturday service from 8:00 am until 4:00 pm; • Fares $1.00 each way and .400 for seniors,Medicare card holders and low income eligible riders; (Fares for the circulator bus service will be consistent with the fares charged by Sun Tran for the fixed route system.) • Fluctuating frequencies to optimize vehicles and meet service demands. The RTA with Town staff would like to implement this service in early May to coincide with the Amphitheater School District summer release schedule. This will allow us to optimize the service through targeting school age children 13-18 who would otherwise be stuck at home. The RTA intends to contract for the delivery of this transit service. The Town will participate in the selection committee for the transit service provider. For additional information detailed service maps are attached. RECOMMENDATIONS: It is the recommendation of the Transit Services Administrator to approve Resolution No. (R) 09- 17 , A resolution of the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, Authorizing and Approving an Itergovernmental Agreement between the Regional Transportation Authority of Pima County and the Town of vlbOro Valley for provision of circulator bus service. W I TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Page 2 of 2 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 01,2009 FISCAL IMPACT: Theo originalprojected total bud et for the circulator service within the Oro Valley/Catalina area was estimated g to be $9.44span million for the life s an of the RTA Plan(until 2026). The service is 100%funded through the RTA. The RTA mayrequest assistance from the Town for the delivery of the circulator bus service. The RTA shall reimburse the Town for services requested by the RTA. Such service requests may include assistance in the development of circulator bus stops,park and ride facilities, service promotion, etc. Therefore, there is no fiscal impact to the Town of Oro Valley for this service. ATTACHMENTS: 1) Resolution 2) A copy of the IGA 3) Map of routes 4) SUGGESTED MOTIONS: The Council may wish to consider one of the following motions: I move to approve Resolution No. (R) 09- 17 A resolution of the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro lid Valley,Arizona, Authorizing and Approving an Intergovernmental Agreement between the Regional Transportation Authority of Pima County and the Town of Oro Valley for provision of circulator bus service. OR I move to deny Resolution No. (R) 09- 17 A resolution of the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, Authorizing and Approving an Intergovernmental Agreement between the Regional Transportation Authority of Pima County and the Town of Oro Valley for provision of circulator bus service. 0044:1\0.4 it ee Rams,y, Transit S ices Administrator . \ � r r Craig alier, Town Engineer r . . ijap, J: -rf.) Watson, A 'stant Town Manager di\-€4...n---- j C joat.t David Andrews, Town Manager RESOLUTION NO. (R)09- 17 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY OF PIMA COUNTY AND THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY FOR PROVISION OF CIRCULATOR BUS SERVICE WHEREAS,the Town of Oro Valley is a political subdivision of the State of Arizona vested with all associated rights, privileges and benefits and is entitled to the immunities and exemptions granted municipalities and political subdivisions under the Constitution and laws of the State of Arizona and the United States; and WHEREAS, the Town is authorized by A.R.S. § 9-240(B)(3) to design, maintain, control and manage public roads within the boundaries of the Town; and WHEREAS, A.R.S. § 48-5301, et seq. authorizes the Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) to act as a regional taxing authority for the purpose of funding multi-model transportation operations and improvements identified in the Regional Transportation Plan ("the Plan") approved by the voters at the special election held in Pima County, Arizona on May 16, 2006; and WHEREAS, a Regional Transportation Fund was established by the Arizona Legislature pursuant to A.R.S. § 48-5307 to be the repository for those funds collected for the purpose of funding the transportation projects identified in the Plan; and WHEREAS, the RTA is authorized by A.R.S. §§ 48-5304(16) and 48-5308 to administer and distribute the regional transportation funds to the members of the RTA in furtherance of that purpose to fund those projects or programs identified in the Plan; and WHEREAS, the Town of Oro Valley and the RTA may contract for services and enter into agreements with one another for joint or cooperative action pursuant to A.R.S. 11-952; and WHEREAS, the Plan calls for the implementation of circulator bus service to serve the Oro Valley/Catalina area; and WHEREAS, the circulator bus service will provide regional connectivity, in-town circulation, connections to important community activity centers, employment generators and park-and-ride facilities; and WHEREAS, both the RTA and the Town desire to cooperate in the implementation of circulator bus service; and U:\RTA OroValley\Current\Circulator\IGA StufResolution-Provision of Circulator Bus Service(2).doc TOV Attorney's Office/sb/030509 WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the Town of Oro Valley to enter into the ntal AIntergov -goderA eement attached hereto as Exhibit "A", with the Regional Transportation provision of Pima Countyfor of circulator bus service to serve the Oro Valley/Catalina area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona that the Intergovernmental Agreement by and between the Regional Transportation Authority of Pima County and the Town of Oro Valley for provision' i n of circulator bus service to serve the Oro Valley/Catalina area,attached hereto as Exhibit"A", is hereby approved. NOW, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and any other administrative officials of are the Town of Oro Valleyherebyauthorized to take such steps as are necessary to execute and implement the terms of the Intergovernmental Agreement. PASSED AND ADOPTEDthe byMayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona y this 1 s tday of April , 2009. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Paul H. Loomis,Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Kathryn E. Cuvelier,Town Clerk Tobin Rosen, Town Attorney Date: Date: 2 INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY OF PIMA COUNTY AND TOWN OF ORO VALLEY FOR PROVISION OF CIRCULATOR BUS SERVICE This Agreement (hereinafter "the Agreement") is entered into by and between the Regional Transportation Authority of Pima County("RTA" or "the Authority"), a special taxingdistrict p formed pursuant to Title 48 Chapter 30 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.), and Town of Oro Valley, a municipal corporation of the State of Arizona ("the Town") ursuant to A.R.S. p § 11-952. RECITALS WHEREAS, the RTA coordinates multi jurisdictional cooperation in transportationlannin and p g fund-raising as a municipal corporation through taxation with the public's input and approval; and cor WHEREAS, on November 30, 2005, pursuant to A.R.S. 48-5309 (A), the RTA adopted a twenty-year, comprehensive, multimodal regional transportation plan (Plan) that is to be primarily funded by a transportation excise tax, described in A.R.S. 42-6106 (Tax); and WHEREAS, on May 16, 2006, the Plan and the Tax were both approved by the voters; and WHEREAS, pursuant to A.R.S. section 48-5304 (13), the RTA shall coordinate the implementation of the Plan among the local jurisdictions; and WHEREAS, the RTA must undertake implementation of the Plan, including the approved neighborhood circulator bus services in various locations within the region; and WHEREAS, the Plan calls for the implementation of circulator bus service to serve the Oro Valley/ Catalina area; and WHEREAS, the circulator bus service will operate on public rights of way of the Town and Arizona Department of Transportation within the Town; and WHEREAS, the RTA has authority to enter into this Agreement by virtue of A.R.S. section 48- 5304 (18); and the action of the RTA Board of Directors; and 1 of 5 WHEREAS the Town and the RTA desire to cooperate in the implementation of circulator bus service. NOW, THEREFORE, TOWN AND RTA ACKNOWLEDGE, UNDERSTAND AND AGREE, AS FOLLOWS: A. Specific Terms 1. Circulator Service Planning. The RTA shall be responsible for the provision of circulator bus service in the region to include the RTA Plan Transit Element and other services through mutual agreement with the Town and its transit partners. The RTA will consult with the Town and the RTA Transit Working Group in the planning for the delivery of this service, including route design, demand planning, scheduling and circulator bus stop locations. 2. Provision of Service. The RTA will be responsible for the provision of circulator bus services, including, but not limited to transit vehicle operation, customer service, fare collection, monthly pass sales, marketing, and circulator bus stops. The Town agrees to assist the RTA in provision of services where practicable. The RTA intends to contract for the delivery of transit services. The Town will participate in the selection committee for the transit service provider. 3. Bus Stops. The RTA will be responsible for all required permits for bus stops associated with thep rovision of circulator bus service. All ti s stops will comply with current ADA Accessibility Guidelines for Buildings and FacilLes (ADAAG). The Town will construct all mutually agreed upon bus stop improvements, with reimbursement by the RTA 4. Legal Requirements. The RTA will be responsible for satisfying all applicable federal, state and local requirements associated with the delivery of circulator bus service. 5. Reporting. The RTA will provide the Town with copies of all Monthly System Summary Performance Reports provided by the contractor, as well as any circulator service performance audits, annual reports, etc. prepared by or for the RTA. 6. Changes in Service. From time to time, modifications to the circulator bus service may occur. The RTA, with participation from the Town and the RTA Transit Working Group, shall develop performance standards for circulator bus service within the region. The RTA will include the Town in the planning and design of service changes in the Town. The RTA and Town agree to hold at least one public meeting in the Town thirty days prior to any substantive changes in circulator bus service. 7. Fares. Fares for the circulator bus service will be consistent with the fares charged by Sun Tran for the fixed route system. The RTA and Town agree to hold at least one public 2 of 5 Nu) meeting in the Town prior to the finalization of any future circulator bus fare changes. 8. Funding. The RTA Plan provides for the funding of circulator bus service within the Town. The Town will assist in the RTA's efforts to secure federal, state, and other additional sources of funding for the provision of enhanced circulator bus service in the Town, but the Town shall have no obligation to fund any portion of the service. 9. Additional Service: The Town may request the RTA assistance in implementation or inclusion of other transit services provided the Townrovides fundingfor such additional p services. Sustainable financial support through an independent IGA or other source must be available for all costs associated with the proposed service. 10. Reimbursement. The RTA may request assistance from the Town for the delivery of circulator bus service. The RTA shall reimburse the Town for services requested by the RTA. Such service requests may include assistance in the development of circulator bus stops, park and ride facilities, service promotion, etc. The Town will provide cost estimates to the RTA for mutually agreed upon reimbursable expenses. Estimated work and payment schedules should be included in the cost estimate. The RTA Administrative Code will be followed for invoicing and reimbursement. 11. Indemnification. To the fullest extent permitted by law, each party to this Agreement shall indemnify, defend and hold the other party, its governing board or body, officers, Nibr departments, employees and agents, harmless from and against any and all suits, actions, legal or administrative proceedings, claims, demands, liens, losses, fines orp enalties damages, liability, interest, attorney's, consultant's and accountant's fees or costs and expenses of whatsoever kind and nature, resulting from or arising out of any act or omission of the indemnifying party, its agents, employees or anyone acting under its direction or control, whether intentional, negligent, grossly negligent, or amounting to a breach of contract, in connection with or incident to the performance of the circulator bus services contemplated in this Agreement. 12. Insurance. For the duration of this Agreement, the RTA agrees to name the Town as an insured party in all vehicular and general liability insurance provided to the RTA or its contractors for the provision of circulator bus service. B. General Terms 13. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement shall be interpreted by a court of competent jurisdiction to be illegal or invalid, the illegal or invalid provision shall be reformed to the extent possible to give its intended effect and/or meaning and all remaining provisions hereof shall continue in full force and effect so long as the economic or legal substance of this Agreement is not affected in any manner materially adverse to any party. 3 of 5 14. Term, Termination and Modification. This Agreement shall become effective upon Ni1110 filing a fully executed original with the office of the Pima County Recorder. The term of this Agreement shall be for one year, beginning on May 1, 2009, unless sooner terminated. However, this Agreement shall automatically renew for additional one-year terms, unless the Town or the RTA notifies the other, in writing, of its intention not to allow this Agreement to renew, at least thirty days prior to the beginning of any renewal term. Either the Town or the RTA may terminate this Agreement, at any time, with or without cause, by giving sixty days advance written notice one to the other. The parties may modify or amend this Agreement, only by written agreement adopted by the Town Council and the RTA Board. 15. No Partnership or Joint Agency. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to create any partnership or joint agency relationship between the Town and the RTA. 16. Cancellation of Political Subdivision and State Contracts. This Agreement is subject to the provisions of A.R.S. § 38-511. 17. No Third Party Beneficiaries. Nothing in the provisions of this Agreement is intended to create duties or obligations to or rights in third parties not parties to this Agreement or affect the legal liability of either party to the Agreement by imposing any standard of care different from the standard of care imposed by law. Nod 4 of 5 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Town of Oro Valley has caused this Agreement to be executed by the Mayor and Council, upon resolution of the Mayor and Council attested to bythe Town Clerk, and the Authority has caused this Agreement to be executed by its Chair of the Board.: Town of Oro Valley Regional Transportation Authority Paul H. Loomis, Mayor Ed Honea, Chair By: By: Date: Date: ATTORNEY CERTIFICATION The foregoing Agreement by and between the Regional Transportation Authority of Pima County and Town of Oro Valley has been reviewed pursuant to A.R.S. Section 11-952 by the undersigned g who have determined that it is in proper form and is within the powers and authority granted under the laws of the State of Arizona to those parties to the Agreement. REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY OF PIMA COUNTY: Lir Thomas Benavidez, Attorney for the Authority Date TOWN OF ORO VALLEY: Tobin Rosen, Town Attorney Date ‘iirr 5 of 5 , .. I Town Recommended Circulator -,-OUt4T.T.: PARK n't CD 8 P CORONADO *too._ ver, New E 1LD,,. - © ... ... 4, 0 ,c) ekt C Ofin* CO PAR* "S' \ 0,, 441 AMIE VIII& ,,,,k fi V 11 flAIE.S4efti* *-.. if p _.._ ......._..0.... z 0' W MOORE RD ICDc. 0 C AS'T AV if..,A Z Northwest -r . Medical c Center.H...:i W TANGER E RD E TANGERINE MO Se, Vestar -.I q ...,,....,,,.„ V . ...I Can 0 Z rN, W CA INO DEL NORTE 0 W NARANJA 1 7, ,.,...,..„.. — k 1'A A D •.., "--,-., •iit Nip, i '\ :I. ( ' (1,,', f‘ 1-,)1 i ' ' N.• .... W LAMB RT LN EX 0 Z 0 I Conquistador Wa ct q CI Z I, gT Z' - 4 s 'tt W LINDA VISTA BL A ..:,A,o4eameoloodt, Ct ...i"II Oro Valley Circulator(Proposed Until 2012) Z'• r Z Iii ,ff...7.),,, Bus Number Co‘: W *V ; IP Z.IP 4 Fire Station AP ..1' Police Station 411 #Time Points , .-., , ..•' col . • -.7„:,*1 W HARDY RD IHospital Transit Station •:1,4.- ' ,A A High School P Park and Ride El Library all Park • ' 6, ic .C1 SunTran Z Sun Awn CIOro Valley Town Limits WMA EE RD Oro Valley Government In , . - C Kohl:s • .,,,,•„,.,,.., , - ,: , 0, z 4eloovNAII!..4 , „ 61 ,. ,.,..,0.-- ,' P , ,,',,,,,,r,,,, '-,':!•,,z,.,-.,--:. 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles W '-•„,,----. E •.., ' E INA RD ''” . 0 1,250 2 500\ Feet , , 5,000Ilik.SERV,' .. IiikliStLii iliSli Sunly . ,.; , ' t. , cZ',. September 2008 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Page 1 of 2 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 1,2009 11160, TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: PAUL KEESLER,DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION MANAGER SUBJECT: Resolution Number (R) 09- 18 , a resolution of the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley approving a temporary construction and permanent slope easement between the Town of Oro Valley and Evergreen-Steam Pump, L.L.C. to acquire access to a portion of the property known as Pima County Tax Parcel No. 220-08-4620 for the construction of the Canada Del Oro Wash Pedestrian Bridge which is being constructed as a part of the Arizona Department of Transportation's State Route 77 (Oracle Road)expansion project . SUMMARY: Evergreen-Steam Pump, L.L.C. owns a parcel of property within the Steam Pump Village Development that lies adjacent to the southern landing of the new Canada Del Oro Wash (CDO) Pedestrian Bridge. In order to gain access and adjust the existing CDO Linear Park walking path to function with the new pedestrian bridge, the Town of Oro Valley has determined the need to acquire a temporary construction and permanent slope easement within the adjacent private property. The property described is located within Pima County Tax parcel No. 220-08-4620. PROJECT OVERVIEW: ,he purpose of the temporary construction and permanent slope easement is to reconstruct a portion of the existing CDO linear park to raise the walking path up to the new walking surface elevation of the new pedestrian bridge. During the construction phase of the project, requiring the temporary construction easement, the Town of Oro Valley is acting as an agent for ADOT under the existing Intergovernmental Agreement ( IGA ) with the State of Arizona, Department of Transportation for the construction of said pedestrian bridge � g spanning the Canada Del Oro Wash. After the construction is complete, the Town of Oro Valley shall maintain the resultant slope under the permanent slope stipulations of the easement. RECOMMENDATIONS: We recommend the approval of Resolution No. (R)09- 18 , thus authorizing and approving Town of Oro Valley to enter into a temporary construction and permanent slope easement between the Town of Oro Valleyand Evergreen-Steam Pump, L.L.C. to acquire access to a portion of the property known as Pima County Tax Parcel No. 220-08-4620 for the construction of the Canada Del Oro Wash Pedestrian Bridge which is being constructed as a part of the Arizona Department of Transportation's State Route 77 (Oracle Road)expansion project. FISCAL IMPACT: Upon the completion and acceptance of the construction, the Town will be responsible for the maintenance of the permanent slope. The cost of maintenance shall be included by the Highway Fund Operations budget. p g ‘mor TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Page 2 of 2 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 1, 2009 Noir ATTACHMENTS: 1) Resolution 2) Attachment 1 —Temporary Construction and Permanent Slope Easement 3) Exhibit A--Legal Description Metes & Bounds of Steam Pump Village Phase IV Boundary 4) Exhibit B—Legal Description Plan Exhibit of Steam Pump Village Phase IV Boundary 5) Exhibit C-1 - Legal Description Metes & Bounds of Temporary Construction Easement 6) Exhibit C-2 - Legal Description Plan Exhibit of Temporary Construction Easement 7) Exhibit C-1 - Legal Description Metes & Bounds of Permanent Slope Easement 8) Exhibit C-2 - Legal Description Plan Exhibit of Permanent Slope Easement SUGGESTED MOTIONS: The Council may wish to consider one of the following motions: I move to approve Resolution Number (R) 09- 18 , a resolution of the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley authorizing and approving Town of Oro Valley to enter into a temporary construction and permanent slope easement between the Town of Oro Valley and Evergreen-Steam Pump,L.L.C.to acquire access to a portion of the property known as Pima County Tax Parcel No. 220-08-4620 for the construction of the Canada Del Oro Wa-L p y Pedestrian Bridge which is being constructed as a part of the Arizona Department of Transportation's State Ro.,,d 77(Oracle Road) expansion project. OR I move to deny Resolution Number (R) 09- 18 , a resolution of the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley authorizing and approving Town of Oro Valley to enter into a temporary construction and permanent slope easement between the Town of Oro Valley and Evergreen-Steam Pump,L.L.C. to acquire access to a portion of the property known as Pima County Tax Parcel No. 220-08-4620 for the construction of the Canada Del Oro Wash Pedestrian Bridge which is being constructed as a part of the Arizona Department of Transportation's State Route 77 (Oracle Road) expansion project. /K_ Paul Keesler, Develo ment Revie )4,,orsion Manager # Ago' foi< C ig Civalier, Town Engineer •K. •. Jerene Wat on,Assis ow Manager nLr `David Andrews, Town Manager"-- RESOLUTION NO. (R) 09- 18 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING AN AGREEMENT FOR A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AND PERMANENT SLOPE EASEMENT WITH EVERGREEN-STEAM PUMP, LLC, IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE ACROSS THE CANADA DEL ORO WASH ON ORACLE ROAD WHEREAS, the Town of Oro Valley is a political subdivision of the State of Arizona vested with all associated rights, privileges and benefits and is entitled to the immunities and exemptions granted municipalities and political subdivisions under the Constitution and laws of the State of Arizona and the United States; and WHEREAS, pursuant to A.R.S. § 9-276, the Town of Oro Valley (Town) is authorized to construct and maintain bridges within the boundaries of the Town; and WHEREAS, on May 21, 2008, the Mayor and Council approved Resolution No. (R) 08- 37, authorizing and approving an Intergovernmental Agreement between the Town and the Arizona Department of Transportation for the construction of a pedestrian bridge across the Canada Del Oro (CDO) Wash; and WHEREAS, Evergreen-Steam Pump, LLC, owns Parcel No. 220-08-4620, which lies within the Steam Pump Village Development, adjacent to the CDO Pedestrian Bridge, which is being constructed as part of the Arizona Department of Transportation's State Route 77 improvements; and WHEREAS, Evergreen-Steam Pump, LLC, and the Town desire to execute an agreement for a temporary construction easement and a permanent slope easement in conjunction with construction and maintenance of the CDO Pedestrian Bridge; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the Town of Oro Valley to enter into the agreement for a temporary construction easement and permanent slope easement with Evergreen-Steam Pump, LLC, attached hereto as Attachment "1", in conjunction with the construction of the CDO Pedestrian Bridge. \\Legal\sharefiles\Public Works\Acquisitions\CDO Pedestnan Bndge\Resolution re Temp Const and Perm Slope Easements.doc TOV Atty's Office/sb/031109 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley,Arizona, that: ',gad SECTION 1. The agreement for a temporary construction easement and permanent slope easement between the Town of Oro Valley and Evergreen-Steam Pump, LLC, attached hereto as Attachment "1", i s hereby approved. SECTION 2. The Town Engineer and other Town administrative officials are hereby authorized to take such steps necessary to execute and implement the terms of the Agreement. PASSED AND ADOPTED by Mayor Ma or and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this is flay of April , 2009. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Paul H. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: lad Kathryn E. Cuvelier, Town Clerk Tobin Rosen, Town Attorney Date Date ATTACHMENT "1" When recorded, return to: Evergreen Devco, Inc. 2398 East Camelback Road Suite 410 Phoenix, Arizona 85016 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AND PERMANENT SLOPE EASEMENT Evergreen-Steam Pump, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company (the "Grantor"), does hereby grant to the Town of Oro Valley, a municipal corporation of the State of Arizona (the "Grantee"), a Temporary Construction Easement and Permanent Slope Easement in connection with the construction of the CDO Pedestrian Bridge (the "Project"). The purpose of the Temporary Construction Easement and Permanent Slope Easement is to allow Grantee, its agents, contractors and assigns, to use the property, as described herein, for construction of the Project and appurtenances. The Temporary Construction Easement and Permanent Slope Easement shall be on, over and across a portion of the real property legally situated in the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, more particularly described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference(the "Property"). 1. Property. The Grantor is the owner of the Property described in Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibit "B" attached hereto. The Grantee has determined that it has a need to acquire a Temporary Construction Easement and Permanent Slope Easement on the Property for the purpose of construction activities in connection with the Grantee's CDO Pedestrian Bridge (the "Project"). For the purposes associated therewith, Grantee agrees to acquire from Grantor, and Grantor agrees to grant to Grantee a Temporary Construction Easement and Permanent Slope Easement over a portion of the Property, subject to the terms and conditions set forth below: 2. Temporary Construction Easement and Permanent Slope Easement. Grantor hereby grants to Grantee, its agents and assigns, a Temporary Construction Easement over the portion of the Property legally described in Exhibit "C-1" and depicted on Exhibit "C-2" attached hereto, for use as a temporary construction area for the Project improvements and associated construction purposes, and a Permanent Slope Easement over the portion of the Property legally described in Exhibit "D-1" and depicted on "Exhibit D-2" attached hereto, for use as an earthen slope embankment to transition the CDO Pedestrian walking surface to existing grade. The effective starting date of the Temporary Construction Easement and Permanent Slope Easement shall be , 2009. 3. Termination. The term of the Temporary Construction Easement is six (6) ‘ier months with an option to continue for an additional twelve (12) months if construction is not complete at the end of said 6-month period, The Temporary Construction Easement shall terminate upon the earlier of (i) the completion of the construction, or (ii) eighteen (18) months after the date of recording of this instrument. 4. Permanent Slope Easement. The Permanent Slope Easement is perpetual. 5. Indemnification. Grantee shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Grantor from any and all present or future claims, demands, and causes of action in law or equity resulting from Grantee's negligent use of the Property. 6. No Vesting of Title. Grantor shall remain the owner of fee title to the Property, subject to the Temporary Construction Easement and Permanent Slope Easement herein. 7. "After" Condition of the Property. Upon termination of the Temporary Construction Easement, Grantee will remove all excess materials, equipment and supplies and leave the Property in a reasonably clean and graded condition. 8. Environmental Representations. The Grantee and the Grantor agree that neither party is assuming any obligation of the other party relating to any potential liability, if any, arising from the environmental condition of the Property, each party remaining responsible for its obligations as set forth by law. Grantee agrees not to use the Property in a manner contrary to applicable environmental law. 9. No Leases. Grantor warrants that there are no oral or written leases on all or any portion of the Property that could affect the Grantee's use of the Temporary Construction Easement and Permanent Slope Easement herein. 10. Encumbrance. If Grantor shall sell or encumber the Property before the termination of the Temporary Construction Easement said transfer or encumbrance shall be and remain subject to the Temporary Construction Easement and Grantor shall notify Grantee of such action. 11. Entire Agreement. This signed document shall constitute the entire Agreement between the parties and no modification or amendment to this Agreement shall be binding unless in writing and signed by both parties. 12. Maintenance. Any necessary maintenance of the earthen slope embankment within the Permanent Slope Easement, and the repair of any damage thereto or to surrounding Property of Grantor caused by or arising from the Project or its improvements (such as, for example, water erosion) is the responsibility of Grantee. 13. Permanent Slope Easement Adjustment. After receiving appropriate approvals and/or permits, Grantor may construct permanent improvements providing 2 comparable lateral support for the Project (such as a retaining wall) to replace the earthen slope embankment within the Permanent Slope Easement. In such event, Grantor will thereafter be responsible for maintaining said permanent improvements. Subsequent to any such improvements being approved, Grantee shall reconvey those applicable portions of the Permanent Slope Easement to the owner of the underlying property causing the interests to merge. 14. DATED as of the day of , 2009. GRANTOR EVERGREEN—STEAM PUMP, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company By: Evergreen-Oro Valley Partners, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company Its: Administrative Member By: Evergreen Development Company-2004, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company Its: Manager By: Evergreen Devco, Inc., a California corporation Its: Manager By: Its: tor STATE OF ARIZONA ) )ss. County of Maricopa ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2009, by , the of Evergreen Devco, Inc., a California corporation,Manager of Evergreen Development g p Company-2004, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company, Manager of Evergreen— Oro Valley Partners, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company, Administrative Member of EVERGREEN—STEAM PUMP, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company, on behalf of the Company, WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public My Commission Expires: tar 3 GRANTEE 'gad TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, a municipal corporation of the State of Arizona Paul H. Loomis,Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Kathryn E. Cuvelier, Town Clerk Tobin Rosen, Town Attorney 4 " 4 SURVEY SERVICES EXHIBIT 'A' LEGAL DESCRIPTION STEAM PUMP VILLAGE I L PHASE IV BOUNDARY BEING A PORTION OF SECTIONS 5 AND 8,TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH,RANGE 14 EAST OF THE GILA&SALT RIVER MERIDIAN,PIMA COUNTY,ARIZONA AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A 2"IRON PIPE FOUND AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 7,TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH,RANGE 14 EAST OF THE GILA& SALT RIVER MERIDIAN,FROM WHICH A G.L.O. STONE FOUND AT THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7 BEARS N. 89° 39'55"W.,A DISTANCE OF 2,610.75 FEET; THENCE N. 00°20'05"E.,ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 5,A DISTANCE OF 270.32 FEET; THENCE N. 56°15'00"E.,A DISTANCE OF 65.30FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N. 56'15'00"E. A DISTANCE OF 871.12 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 2804.79 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14°30'00",AN ARC LENGTH OF 709.82 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING NON-TANGENT TO SAID CURVE,N. 83'18'14"E.,A DISTANCE OF 72.16 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EXISTING NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE FOR THE TUCSON-FLORENCE HIGHWAY(SR 77—AKA ORACLE ROAD), SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS POINT THAT BEARS N. 61'06'13"W.,A DISTANCE OF 3719.72 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 24°25'52",AN ARC LENGTH OF 1586.10 FEET TO A POINT ON THE CHORD OF A SPIRAL CURVE FOR TUCSON-FLORENCE HIGHWAY(SR 77--AKA ORACLE ROAD),AS RECORDED IN BOOK 42 OF MAPS AND PLATS,PAGE 40,PIMA COUNTY RECORDS; THENCE S.54'03'12"W.,ALONG SAID CHORD,A DISTANCE OF 127.13 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID EXISTING NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE FOR TUCSON-I,LORENCE HIGHWAY(SR 77--AKA ORACLE ROAD),N.36°00'00"W.,.A DISTANCE OF 216.63 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 199.50 FEET; Page 1 of 2 S:\3-06080(Steam Pump Ph 111)Docs\PHASE IV BDY LEGAL.doc (p)602.286.9300 I (f)602.286.9400 1 www_optimus-usa.com 4650 E Cotton Center Blvd. I Suite#140 I Phoenix,AZ 85040 . . THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 20°00'00",AN ARC LENGTH OF 69.64 FEET; THENCE N. 16'00'00"W.,A DISTANCE OF 17.18 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 200.50 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 20'00'00",AN ARC LENGTH OF 69.99 FEET; THENCE N. 36°00'00"W.,A DISTANCE OF 167.76 FEET TO THE Pottsff OF BEGINNING. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINS 625,332 SQUARE FEET OR 14.36 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. LAND/tA 11 Lij BEVERLY A ° ci.: • -0 2} i ? ROSSI P %4e.;.1:itil.--••• .• 44.'t!ri0NA,u3''%. Expires 6/301 it Page 2 of 2 S:\3-06080(Steam Pump Ph 111)Docs\PHASE IV BOY LEGAL.doc (p)602.286 9300 I (f)602,286.9400 I www.optimus-usa.com 4650 E Cotton Center Blvd. 1 Suite#140 1 Phoenix,AZ 85040 . • STEAM PUMP VILLAGE tkltb PHASE IV E ' B ' 3106080 CURVE DELTA RADIUSLEN -41/671,40/, GTH TANGENT - •.,9.6,,,14 C1 14'30'00" 2804.79' 709.82' 356.81' �1 ,3-Pa C2 , 24'25'52" 3719.72 1586.10' , 805.290' -t -'�6. L4 C3 20'00'00" 199.50' 69.64' 35.18' 14A-r-r 9.0p.\- C4 20'00'00" , 200.50' 69.99' 35.35' C" \'. / i 0,9A , 4r c/s) 0 � � g P,C)C '0C-1, C- 6 1 . VvN\ ‘c. P.:C)P1/4 G�' \- 611- p.o.e. P S J 0- 0)'' 52 5 4bo6 f N 1 4 CCR SEC 7 \, 4 S /FD GLO STONE f 11,.11:1 / • OD :I 0,r 6% l',..‘ N 89 39 55 W rp, �' ?610.75' � �' ��\r' 0 6' N A*. 'O ~ po.a r•J NE COR SEC 7 UNE BEARING DISTANCE T 12 5, .R 14 E i'n LI N 0070'05"E 270.32' • • ED 2" IRON PIPE L2 N56'15'00"E 65.30' WI25" LEAD CAPD " L3 N 56'15 00 E 871.12 C� 0 - L4 N831814 E 72.16' D'.1 ivdtv �, L5 S54•03'12"W 127.13' �, 141. L6 N36 0C 00 W 216.63' z C;- L7 NI 6'00'00"W 17.18' f LB N36 00 00 W 167.76' r 2 1 IA. -. • r�,, \\B ATF ;� 4. _ L 44-.- ' 37786 Q fi- . .. r if BEVERLY A. a. 0. ROSS! OPTIMUS -0g� cid.. „2 Q; SURVEY SERVICESg 4/ii ‘x. • 01A, '`' Expires 6/30/ it • 4650 E.COTTON CEN1Hz BOULEVARD SURE 140 PHOIX,AZ 89044 PH:(602)286-9300ENFA)C(602)286-9400 81 M i=;:;" Prepared By: BAR Datir 2/27/2009 Chocked SAW attest NW 1 Of 1 EXHIBIT— "C-1" LEGAL DESCRIPTION TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT A temporary construction easement, lying in the Southwest one quarter of section 5, Township 12 South, Range 14 East, GSRM, Pima County Arizona, more particularly described as follows: COMMINCING at a point which bears South 33 degrees 09 minutes 04 seconds East, a distance of 1979.84 feet, from the West one quarter corner of said section 5; and also bears North 47 degrees 49 minutes 50 seconds East, a distance of 1441.37 feet, from the Southwest corner of said section 5; and also bears North 58 degrees 04 minutes 22 seconds West, a distance of 1797.75 feet, from the South one quarter corner of said section 5, said point being on a non-tangent curve. A radial line through said curve bears North 26 degrees 02 minutes 23 seconds West; THENCE 69.67 feet along the arc of said curve, to the right, concave Southeasterly, having a radius of 2804.79 feet, through a central angle of 01 degrees 25 minutes 24 seconds, to the POINT OF BEGINNING. THENCE South 26 degrees 02 minutes 23 seconds East, a distance of 20.00 feet, to a point on a non-tangent curve. A radial line through said curve bears North 26 degrees 02 minutes 23 seconds West; Saw THENCE 220.02 feet along the arc of said curve, to the right, concave Southeasterly, having a radius of 2784.79 feet, through a central angle of 04 degrees 31 minutes 36 seconds. THENCE North 21 degrees 30 minutes 47 seconds West, a distance of 20.00 feet to a point of non-tangent curve. A radial line through said point bears North 21 degrees 30 minutes 47 seconds West; THENCE 221.60 feet along the arc of said curve, to the left, concave Southeasterly, having a radius of 2804.79 feet, through a central angle of 04 degrees 31 minutes 36 seconds, to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 4,416 sq. ft. or 0.101 acres more or less. 3 h -11EXioir .. Y EXHIBIT — " " C � • THIS SEC 5 PROJECT LOCATION MAP SV1/4, SECTION 5 SCALE. I' = 200' T12S, R14E, GLSRM PIMA COJNTY ARIZONA W1/4 COR SEC 5 7 5a6.3 " hA .4 -‘a .4 !�3�g � �,5b�Zh Skiu 'Po c ,, 0. s,O W.xr. t4., 1' Z J.'• N T.' CO 3'• 1?4._'.-1 'P` 1' t' R=2804.79' ' L=221.60 d=04.31'36' R=2804.79' %13 .� L=69.67' �i., d 0=01.25'24' , ta', \`�N -.O.B.-C+1•� \o, 7. P.O.B.-A R=2784,79' �N�, L=220.02' %,‘,. 9� j\� A=04.31'36' r �c�l %� . N oN` N21'30'47'W S1/4 COR 20.00' 17 SW COR ��A,R ,- %� A P� 4'9) ' SEC 5 SEC 5 % �% '›,s. i.V ` TEMPORARY _,-2 C.L A/�� ri , ., ca NQ Cq `�� hi L CONSTRUCTION 4. ti �ATEWj j 235 a 'C7. SWI/4 SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 14 EAST .� o ,Dcr r Et et • p b�•a..0•& Z't'"'d- JOB ND. DATE SHEET4111.io O L 11G -, Expires 09-30-09 26077 10-13-2006 1 OF 1 _ 41V1) St TRVEY I `", illisaly EXHIBIT— "D-1" LEGAL DESCRIPTION PERMANENT EASEMENT A temporary construction easement, lying in the Southwest one quarter of section 5, Township 12 South, Range 14 East, GSRM, Pima County Arizona, more particularly described as follows: COMMINCING at a point which bears South 33 degrees 09 minutes 04 seconds East, a distance of 1979.84 feet, from the West one quarter corner of said section 5; and also bears North 47 degrees 49 minutes 50 seconds East, a distance of 1441.37 feet, from the Southwest corner of said section 5; and also bears North 58 degrees 04 minutes 22 seconds West, a distance of 1797.75 feet, from the South one quarter corner of said section 5, said point being on a non-tangent curve. A radial line through said curve bears North 26 degrees 02 minutes 23 seconds West; THENCE 69.67 feet along the arc of said curve, to the right, concave Southeasterly, having a radius of 2804.79 feet, through a central angle of 01 degrees 25 minutes 24 seconds, to the POINT OF BEGINNING. THENCE South 26 degrees 02 minutes 23 seconds East, a distance of 20.00 feet, to a point on a non-tangent curve. A radial line through said curve bears North 26 degrees 02 minutes 23 seconds West; %sr THENCE 220.02 feet along the arc of said curve, to the right, concave Southeasterly, Y, having a radius of 2784.79 feet, through a central angle of 04 degrees 31 minutes 36 seconds. THENCE North 21 degrees 30 minutes 47 seconds West, a distance of 20.00 feet to a point of non-tangent curve. A radial line through said point bears North 21 degrees 30 minutes 47 seconds West; THENCE 221.60 feet along the arc of said curve, to the left, concave Southeasterly, having a radius of 2804.79 feet, through a central angle of 04 degrees 31 minutes 36 seconds, to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 4,416 sq. ft. or 0.101 acres more or less. -<.-T-"--:-r:E;-------:'\ ,' .: ,, :-:." 2,':..2'' 5 .c-:'\\j':)\,\ :::, - ' . - z) j ‘ilifir \\ V."` DV I I/ _s4� E0 ,,,,,/:7 rte— - r'' • EXHIBIT "D2 — " THIS _..NN,c;EC 5 PROJECT LOCATION MAP SV1/4, SECTION 5 SCALE,1' = 200► T 12 S, R 14 E, GISRM PIMA COUNTY ARIZONA W1/4 COR SEC 5 r 1480.03' WE 526.32' J •���4A .ham. ..i, ‘er. 4/1 .9..1p s`� o_ F 66 se' c 11°• JP R=2804.79' <A L=221.60 =O4.31'36' • R=2804.79' y. L=69.67' ,;:�., rd A=01.25'24' �ti P.O.B.-C+I �No• joiloo P.O.B.-A ►. R=2784.79' 4 L=220.02' ‘1 3� l'ei� A=04.31'36' .h%• ZN �o‘, N21'30'47'W . '' qj N� S1/4 COR 20.00' SW COR �*'1 *\* ‘ N1,?�� f)9) ' SEC 5 SEC 5 ` 1(....` ')S- c. ` z PERMANENT v .4._ , rpl L4N ICqPCi Q in�L SCOPEoInko tiSTATEWII2 CO 0 0 In CI C 35235 Q •- cL STAN G. ' o oN EASEMENT 4111114k FARIS 2 J . 9• •. SW1/4 SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 14 EAST !1r-i'�, � ' JOB NO. DATE SHEET o D 4 A G P Ex ires 09-30-09 26077 10-13-2006 1 OF 1 -11\rD Si rilvEYI TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Page 1 of 2 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: 04/01/09 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: Sandra Abbey, Human Resources Director RESOLUTION(R)09-19 SUBJECT: Review and possible approval of Memorandum of Understanding between the Public Safety Employees and the Town of Oro Valley for the period of July 1, 2009 to June 30, 2010 SUMMARY: The Public Safety and Management negotiating g g g tea ms have agreed to all information contained in the attached Memorandum of Understanding for the period of July 1, 2009 to June 30, 2010, with attachments A-C. Attachment A is a copy of the draft step-plan salary structure. This structure has no increases for the 2009-2010 fiscal year. Attachment B is a copy of the draft merit-plan salary structure. This structure has no increases for the 2009-2010 fiscal year. Attachment C is a list of the agreed upon benefits available toublic safety y employees. These are incorporated in existing benefits programs and will not have an increased financial impact on the Town. Twoolic p y wording changes related to accrual of sick leave, that do not impact the Town financially, brought be brow ht forward in a separate policy change recommendation before June 30, 2009 as agreed upon by the MOU negotiating committee. ATTACHMENTS: 1) Resolution No. (R) 09-19 adopting the Memorandum of Understandingwith attachments for the period of July 1, 2009 through June 30, 2010. 2) MOU with attachments, signed by the management and public safety negotiating g teams. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve resolution (R) 09- 19 , adopting the Memorandum of Understanding between the Public Safety Employees and the Town of Oro Valley for the period of Jul 1, 2009 to June July 30, 2010. OR Other motion..... TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Page 2 of 2 • COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: 04/01/0' New Sandra Abbey, Human Resourefs Director d/14;i 7:214,44,140. David Andrews, Town Manager RESOLUTION NO. (R) 09- 19 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, APPROVING A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN PUBLIC SAFETY EMPLOYEES AND THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 4, SECTION 4-1-8 OF THE TOWN CODE, PUBLIC SAFETY EMPLOYEE RELATIONS AND PROCESSES WHEREAS, the Town of Oro Valley is committed to the development and continuation nation of harmonious and cooperative relationships with all of its employees; and WHEREAS, the Town recognizes the right of public safetyemployees to join employee ees p y p yee associations which comply with the laws of Arizona and to resent proposalsand testimony to the Town Council, and not to be discharged, disciplined or discriminated against because of g the exercise of those rights; and WHEREAS, the continued smooth operation of the Police Department is ofg reat benefit to the residents of Oro Valley and the general public; and WHEREAS, in 2004 the Town Council adopted Ordinance No. (0) 04-28 which enacted Town Code Chapter 4, Section 4-1-8, Public Safety Employee Relations and Processes, establishing a meet and confer process for public safety employees and the Town, and the Town Council refined this process through Ordinance No. (0) 05-44 on November 2, 2005; and WHEREAS, the Memorandum of Understanding, attached hereto as Exhibit A, was negotiated ‘Illy between the Public Safety Negotiation Committee and the Town's Management g t Negotiation Committee in accordance with Chapter 4, Section 4-1-8, Public Safety Employee Em to ee Relations and Processes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, that the Memorandum of Understanding attached hereto as exhibit A between the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, and Public Safety Employees is hereby approved. roved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that agreement attached as exhibit A shall be effective for the period of July 1, 2009 through June 30, 2010. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 1st day of April 2009. H:\Council Communications\draft Resolution MOU 0910(R).doc Town of Oro Valley Attorney's Office/arm/04/26/07 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY • Paul H. Loomis, Mayor -vaid ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk Tobin Rosen, Town Attorney Date: Date: H:\Council Communications\draft Resolution MOU 0910(R).doe Town of Oro Valley Attorney's Office/arm/04/26/07 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN PUBLIC SAFETY EMPLOYEES AND THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY FOR THE PERIOD JULY 1, 2009 TO JUNE 30, 2010 This Memorandum of Understanding exists between the Town of Oro Valley and the Public Safety Employee Group as provided for in Town of Oro Valley Ordinance (0) 05- 44. We recognize the primary interest of allp is arties to provide Ovide excellent service through partnerships that build trust, revent crime and p promote a safe environment to enhance the quality of life within our community. This Memorandum orandum addresses the fact that the Town strives to provide for working conditions, wages and benefits in a consistent manner for all Town employees, as outlined in the Town of Oro Valley Personnel Policies and Procedures, while recognizing that g there are additional considerations related to specific jobpositions. This J Memorandum of Understanding will address those considerations and/or clarifications as they pertain to job positions of the Public Safety Employee Group. p Compensation Police officers, police officers assigned as lead officers, detectives, sergeants, dispatchers, dispatchers assigned as lead dispatchers, communications canons supervisors, records specialists, records supervisors, propertyforensics technicians, and lead information technician/forensic technicians are pursuant compensated p p uant to a Step Pay Plan (Attachment A) as approved by the Town Council for each fiscal year. These members, whose annual performance appraisals area roved bythe pp Chief of Police, and whose performance appraisals indicate acceptableperformance p by at least meeting requirements/expectations in accordance with the current appraisal system ratings y in effect at the time will be compensated at the next higher stepplan rate for the position if approved by the Town Council each fiscal year. Office assistants, office specialists, receptionists, crime analysts, senior for office specialists, public information officers, maintenance technicians, andolic p e administrative service managers are compensatedursuant to Town of p Oro Valley Personnel Policies and Procedures, Policy 6-Classification, Policy12-Compensation 2-Compensation and Policy 13-Pay Adjustments .These members receive annual merit increases based on the summary of all factors rated in annual performance reviews approved by the Chief of Police in accordance with the current Town of Oro Valley performance evaluation procedure in effect at the time and the list of Job Classifications in salary grade order detailing salary ranges (Attachment B) if such merit increases are approved by Town Council each fiscal year. An annual adjustment may be authorized by the Town Council each fiscal year. In the event an annual adjustment is authorized, such adjustment will be applied to h pp employees on the step pay plan and to employees on the salary rade plan. g "` Members assigned as motor officers, D.A.R.E. officers, school resource officers and canine handlers will be compensated with an additional $40 per week ($80perbi- Public Safety MOU thru 06302009.doc 1 weekly pay period) "special assignment" pay. Additional assignments may be included for assignment pay at the direction of the Chief of Police. Police officers assigned as investigators in the Detective Unit of the Oro Valley Police Department will be compensated at the detective pay rate commensurate with the step reached through years of service as police officers. Detectives and police officers assigned as investigators in the Detective Unit of the Oro Valley Police Department will receive annual performance reviews and compensation step increase consideration based on the anniversary date of their assignment as sworn police officers. Police Officers assigned as Field Training Officers will be compensated with an additional $40 per week ($80 per bi-weekly pay period) "special assignment" pay during the period they are actively involved in the field training phases of officer(s) in field training. Members will receive additional on-call pay at a rate of $1.00 per hour in accordance with Town of Oro Valley Personnel Policies and Procedures, Policy 30-On-Call and emergency Call—Out Pay. Members will receive shift differential pay at a rate of $1.00 per hour for regular scheduled hours worked between the hours of 1800 and 0600 hours. It is the member's responsibility to indicate hours subject to shift differential on payroll time sheets when the time sheets are submitted. If a member works a shift that includes hours subject to shift differential pay as a result of a shift trade with another member, the member who was scheduled to work that time will receive the shift differential pay. Members must keep this in mind when they work out a shift trade with another member. Members will be compensated with overtime pay at a rate 1.5 times their regular hourly rate or accrue compensatory time pursuant to Town of Oro Valley Personnel Policies and Procedures, Policy 14-overtime. Paid leave time may be considered part of a member's normal work period for the calculation of overtime compensation as long as the paid leave time is not the same shift day as that for which overtime compensation is requested. However, if the member was called out during hours other than the member's regular hours of work on a day where paid leave time was used for normal work hours they may receive overtime compensation for the time worked related to the call out. Members who are called into work during hours other than the member's regular hours and/or days of work shall be compensated by two hours of overtime or the actual time spent working whichever is greater. If the member is called into work within 60 minutes of the completion of the member's normal work period, the member shall be compensated for overtime from the end of his or her normal work period until the member completes the assignment, is no longer required, or goes off-duty. If a member's normal work period begins within the two hour period of being called into duty, the overtime shall be compensated from the call in time to the beginning of the normal work period. Members who are required to attend any pretrial hearing, Motor Vehicle Division hearing, civil or criminal trial to carry out the member's departmental duty during hours Public Safety MOU thru 06302009.doc 2 other than the member's regular hours and/or days of work shall be compensated p d by three hours of overtime or the actual time spent in attendance, whichever is r is greater. If the attendance required within 60 minutes of the member's normal work period,p the member shall be compensated for overtime from the end of his or her normal work period to the end of the required appearance. If a member's normal workeriod begins p g ns within the three hour period of a required appearance, the overtime shall be compensated from the appearance time to the beginning of the normal workp eriod. Members who are required to attend additional hearings or trials in one day shall not receive a second minimum 3-hour period of overtime compensation unless the additional appearance is required more than 60 minutes from the end of the three hour period or release from previous required appearance, whichever is later. Members in certified peace officer positions, dispatchers, dispatchers assigned as lead dispatchers, communications supervisors, and forensic technicians will be compensated for a 30 minute meal period as part of their regular work period as long as these members remain available to immediately respond to provide service when necessary during the meal period. Work schedules Members' work week will remain flexible and assigned by Department management to best meet the needs of the Town. Job descriptions are available for all members' positions; these descriptions may further define work schedules. Work schedules for uniformed patrol assignments will be four consecutive days of ten hours with a regularly scheduled minimum of ten hours rest period between shifts. Adjustments to the regular work schedule may be made by supervisors to address court appearances, training requirements, deployment shortages, regular shift change conflicts, and other special needs of the member or department. The basic four consecutive days of ten hours scheduling for uniformed patrol assignments will only be changed through direction of the Chief of Police based on critical need to provide service. Retirement Benefits Members eligible for the Public Safety Personnel Retirement system (P.S.P.R.S. 20 year retirement plan for certified peace officers) shall contribute a percentage of their salary and the Town shall contribute an additional percentage of the member's salary as outlined in the Arizona Revised Statutes. Percentages may fluctuate annually depending on actions of the State of Arizona. Members who elect to "drop" in the Public Safety Personnel Retirement system receive an additional percentage contribution of the member's salary from the Town commensurate with the current rate of employer contribution for Arizona State Retirement System members (which percentages may fluctuate annually depending on actions of the State of Arizona) into a "457" deferred compensation plan for the member. Public Safety MOU thru 06302009.doc 3 Members eligible for the Corrections Officer Retirement Plan (CORP. 25 year retirement plan for dispatchers, lead dispatchers and communications supervisors) contribute a percentage of salary and the Town shall contributes an additional percentage of the member's salary as outlined in the Arizona Revised Statutes. Percentages may fluctuate annually depending on actions of the State of Arizona. All remaining members will participate in the Arizona State Retirement System (defined benefit plan for all members not eligible for P.S.P.R.S. or C.O.R.P.) and shall contribute a percentage of salary and the Town shall contribute an additional percentage of the member's salary as outlined in the Arizona Revised Statutes. Percentages may fluctuate annually depending on actions of the State or the member's salary. Additional Retirement Benefit/Duty Weapon Purchase Request A member who retires from a certified Peace Officer position with 20 or more years of service with the Oro Valley Police Department with P.S.P.R.S. benefits is eligible to make a request by memorandum to the Chief of Police for purchase of a specific issued duty weapon for $1.00 as authorized under Arizona Revised Statute 38-845.F. If such request is approved by the Chief of Police, the member shall present the memorandum endorsed by the Chief to property section personnel, along with the $1 .00 payment receipt, to obtain the weapon. Property section personnel will complete a property sheet and obtain the signature of the retiring officer receiving the weapon. A member who retires from a certified Peace Officer position with more than 10 but less than 20 years of service with the Oro Valley Police Department with P.S.P.R.S. benefits is eligible to make a request by memorandum to the Chief of Police for purchase of a specific issued duty weapon at a percentage of the Law Enforcement Agency replacement cost amount as authorized under Arizona Revised Statute 38-845.F. If such request is approved by the Chief of Police, the member shall present the memorandum endorsed by the Chief to property section personnel, along with the payment receipt in the percentage amount of the Law Enforcement Agency replacement cost, to obtain the weapon. Property section personnel will complete a property sheet and obtain the signature of the retiring officer receiving the weapon. The percentage cost shall be 50% of the replacement cost amount at 10 years of service, reduced by 5% for each additional year of service. Any request made by a member to purchase a specific duty weapon upon retirement shall be made at the time of notice of retirement which is at least two weeks prior to retirement from a certified Peace Officer position. Uniforms and Equipment Members in certified peace officer positions, maintenance technicians and forensic technicians will receive $1 ,200 annually (in quarterly payments of $300 after the first year of service because new officers (maintenance technicians and forensic technicians) receive a $1,200 lump sum payment upon hire) to purchase and maintain uniforms, clothing and equipment sufficient to comply with OVPD Rules Chapter 12. Public Safety MOU thru 06302009.doc 4 Members in certified peace officer positions will receive a stipend toward the purcha• se410 of a ballistic vest of their choice every five years. The vest must meet or exceed National Institute of Justice Standards 0101.03 and 0101.04, "Ballistic Resistance of Personal Body Armor". Members in certified peace officer positions will be issued a duty weapon, dut belt, , chemical defense agent, baton, pocket recorder and duty belt accessories to carry equipment normally carried on the duty belt. Other specialty may equipmentbe issued p to members as approved by the Chief of Police. If a newly hired certified peace officer, maintenance technician or forensic technician terminates employment with the Town of Oro Valley for any reason within the first 12 months after their date of hire, a pro-rated portion (calculated as a percentage of gdays employed out of a total 365 calendar year days) of the original $1,200 uniform allowance advance will be owed to the Town and shall be deducted from the employee's final paycheck. A member who receives uniform allowance and must spend over the $1 ,200 uniform allowance, in any year of service to maintain compliance with OVPD Rules & Procedures, for the repair or replacement of uniforms, clothing, and equipment items damaged, lost or stolen in the performance of assigned duty without fault or negligence of the member shall be reimbursed by the Town for those costs over $1,200 when documentation of the loss and additional costs are provided and the Chief of Police approves the reimbursement. Notice of Proposed Additions or Changes to Personnel Policies and Procedures It is understood that policy and procedures are operational matters reserved to management discretion. At any time the Town may propose to the Town Council changes or additions to the Town of Oro Valley Personnel Policies and Procedures that could potentially affect wages, benefits, hours, safety regulations and/or other working conditions of the public safety employee group, which have not been issues subject to the meet and confer process related to the current Memorandum of Understanding. Should the Town propose such additions or changes, the Town will notify the most recent members of the Public Safety Negotiation Committee of any proposed additions or changes to these policies and procedures to allow the opportunity for the PSNC to provide input to management or the Council on the proposed changes or additions. Notification to the PSNC will be no later than the date listed for "council Packets Distributed by the Clerk's Office" (generally approximately 12 days prior to the Council meeting). Oro Valley Police Department Member Benefits In addition to the Member benefits described herein, there is a current list of Member benefits and/or working conditions provided through the Town of Oro Valley (Attachment C). Public Safety MOU thru 06302009.doc 5 Signed and dated: Public Safety Negotiation Committee: Management Negotiation Committee: & -z_._Kevin Matt. s, Police Officer San•ra Abbey, Human Resourc Director di in an, /IS (Vag)art7 R ,, Lorinda Navarro, Crime Analyst Stacey Lemo , Finance Dir: to 1 f ,: / ' i ,cr„.______.a7A __- Christina DeSoto, Police Officer A- • Les-ue mrYran er I/ if . 'Tr/ ,-- -..tr.M0t: - /.: Robert Goddard, Sergeant Public Safety MOU thru 06302009.doc 6 . tir Z o) a. OoN oN co. 0Nr. oN (' O co w o ,�; � O CO� � CO� Cfl 0 � N N N N N _ Co Co CO LO Ln (N M U o Eft Eft Eft EA- Eft Eft � Q z H D , H > N- (D co co N- C Nr ° co Cr) M CO oo CD o a -;;:rOo N o r- CV C6 Lo 01) 0r0 o N Q 6N N 6N9 Q ( CO 69 � VI 0) 69 0 N O CO Ln CO CO '4- �. 6g ifs a Eft Eft Eft Eft Eft Eft Eft Cz CU U) 0 �p co (N 0 co Co (N N CD (D O cl? Cao 00 CO0CD. 0) N oo co N a) fa- N (0 N '- N T- N CO N N-- 00 N `- N � E� � � � Ef} L� 69 0 � � 69 1� � C� � CO D 3 Eft Eft (f- Eft � CO �f' aEA a) al z m N CO N Co co N C7) 'N 4-' C e o (0 N (0 Ln CO N- N Co .Cr Ln (N CD N CE C(13 CD •N0 (aCO NN . '' . Cfl E p (i) N 6,, 64 f` co ca v' 69 co C 3 in in Ln tet. 't Co 69 v• i a) (f� Eft Eft Eft Eft Eft Eft ca z a , • , . 4 , a) v. � � o � N � � � � 0M co CO Lo � Ln � Cfl oCfl 0 0 o �' MLn O COLO LUN o 14) O ( 'Cr Ott ; (N - (N co N N CO N CU co - _ () () 69- 0) (N 'Cf' CO CO & N-•• N 69- N- (9 NI" 64 69 C3) N U Vt Ln Lncia- CO `- = Eft Eft Co CO CO Ln CO a) Eft Eft (ft (ft ta EC C z P >, M Co 'Ct• CO CO N CO CO O CO N (n CO ti' 0), LU "Cr V. a) Ln Cho CO '14- a) _� tZ O co . Ln . co co N- Co N- ti CD co N r-- Co U ,) N Co N C) N '�' M O O7 Ls-, 6 ,- oo N (O co 't -- � N- p (n 6A. r--. v) O ea (N.1 69 CN 6L} O) bg N-- 6 k t} cf) 6N9 C CO N- F- -� E > Ln Ln N- Co Nr Ln CO Ln CO Ln Q 0 E 0 a) (ft- V> Eft Eft Eft � � Z U O o c N 1 o M LU N LU 0 N No ' - co N N N Co - w • N CO CO 4 -:1- co N 0O O O) Ln cd N 6 CD Co -N N CO N C- O () ca Ln N(,� }- CO O O Ef} CO 69 0) ti) 0O 69 N €9 0) 69 Cfl Ln N 'd" Nt in N- Co CO in co d- CO Ln (f3- Eft (ft Eft Eft (f> Eft Eft (ft Eft (ft O z O O o 'er LoO ,-- , N ,- N- N 00 Co 00 rn CO Ln COON CO c`� C o`�o COI' o CLr)O CU 0 CO a - C) N N Co V' cN Lf) N- Ln 00 O N- 00 4 co Co 0) cb N ca CN ... 69 V. 69 C.0 69 CO 69 CO 6R (.fl 64 CO 69- (C) V) CD El> N- (fl Ln 69 -I- (/) 't •cr `Ct co co co LO co v' co Ln try Eft Eft Eft Eft Eft Eft Eft Eft Eft v)- a) z C i ttS O cz cn •U _ ._ C O U C O C) -C C Q f`- U CO .0 0 .,._, o W a) _U '- cn cn V •C 0 a) C •( � w00 a) - a) Q a) •ca 1— (,)UVC3 Q O LL 1 J 5 :+ co } - > CU •� n n U, E 72- 12 a) Q E O o Q � ° a) a) a) .� a) o a) a) o o CL 0 (1) 0 - U C CC 0 _1 LL FY 2009-2010 SALARY RANGES IN PAY RANGE ORDER ATTACHMENT B JOB TITLE I Salary Rangel Hrly/Annual I MinimumMid Town Manager I Midpoint I Maximum g 95 Hourly 59.86 $74.83 $89.80 Annual $124,519 $155,648 $186,778 Assistant Town Manager 86 Hourly $47.94 $59.92 $71.91 Annual $99,712 $124,640 $149,568 Police Chief 84 Hourly $45.6257.0 $ 3 $68.44 Annual $94,898 $118,623 $142,348 Town Attorney 83 Hourly $44.5155.63 $ $66.76 Annual $92,576 $115,720 $138,864 Deputy Police Chief 82 Hourly $43.4254.28 $ $65.13 Annual $90,317 $112,896 $135,476 Finance Director 82 Hourly $43.4254.28 $ $65.13 Annual $90,317 $112,896 $135,476 Magistrate Judge 82 Hourly $43.42 $54.28 $65.13 Annual $90,317 $112,896 $135,476 Public Works Director/Town Engineer 82 Hourly $43.42 $54.28 $65.13 j Annual $90,317 $112,896 $135,476 Water Utility Director 82 Hourly $43.42 $54.28 $65.13 Annual $90,317 $112,896 $135,476 Human Resources Director 79 Hourly $40.33 $50.4160.4 $ 9 Annual $83,878 $104,847 $125,817 Building Safety Director 78 Hourly $39.34 $49.18 $59.01 Annual $81,830 $102,288 $122,745 Information Technology Director 78 Hourly $39.34 $49.18 $59.01 Annual $81,830 $102,288 $122,745 Parks& Recreation Director 78 Hourly $39.34 $49.18 $59.01 Annual $81,830 $102,288 $122,745 Planning &Zoning Director 78 Hourly $39.34 $49.18 $59.01 Annual $81,830 $102,288 $122,745 'ay Town Clerk 78 Hourly $39.34 $49.18 $59.01 Annual $81,830 $102,288 $122,745 Chief Civil Deputy Attorney 77 Hourly $38.38 $47.97 $57.57 Annual $79,824 $99,781 $119,737 Police Commander 77 Hourly $38.38 $47.97 $57.57 Annual $79,824 $99,781 $119,737 Town Prosecutor 77 Hourly $38.38 $47.97 $57.57 Annual $79,824 $99,781 $119,737 Development Review Division Manager 75 Hourly $36.53 $45.66 $54.79 Annual $75,982 $94,978 $113,973 Economic Development Administrator 75 Hourly $36.53 $45.66 $54.79 Annual $75,982 $94,978 $113,973 Engineering Division Manager 75 Hourly $36.53 $45.66 $54.79 Annual $75,982 $94,978 $113,973 Water Utility Engineering Division Mngr ' 73 Hourly $34.77 $43.47 $52.16 Annual $72,330 $90,412 $108,495 Assistant Planning and Zoning Director 73 Hourly $34.77 $43.47 $52.16 Annual $72,330 $90,412 $108,495 Procurement Administrator 72 Hourly $33.92 $42.40 $50.88 Annual $70,556 $88,195 $105,834 Communications Administrator 72 Hourly $33.92 $42.40 $50.88 Annual $70,556 $88,195 $105,834 Library Administrator 72 Hourly $33.92 $42.40 $50.88 Annual $70,556 $88,195 $105,834 VP 1 1 JOB TITLE J Salary Range Hrly/Annual I Minimum Midpoint 1 Maximum Police Lieutenant 71 Hourly $33.09 $41.36 $49.63 Annual $68,825 $86,031 $103,238 ' Public Works Operations Division Mngr 71 Hourly $33.09 $41.36 $49.63 Annual $68,825 $86,031 $103,238 L. Water Utility Administrator 71 Hourly $33.09 $41.36 $49.63 Annual $68,825 $86,031 $103,238 Senior Civil Engineer 70 Hourly $32.29 $40.36 $48.43 Annual $67,157 $83,947 $100,736 Assistant Town Prosecutor 66 Hourly $29.25 $36.57 $43.88 Annual $60,845 $76,056 $91,267 Civil Attorney 66 Hourly $29.2536.57 $ $43.88 Annual $60,845 $76,056 $91,267 Water Distribution Superintendent 66 Hourly $29.25 $36.57 $43.88 Annual $60,845 $76,056 $91,267 Water Production Superintendent 66 Hourly $29.25 $36.57 $43.88 Annual $60,845 $76,056 $91,267 Accounting Supervisor 65 Hourly $28.54 $35.68 $42.81 Annual $59,367 $74,209 $89,050 Assistant Building Official 65 Hourly $28.54 $35.68 $42.81 Annual $59,367 $74,209 $89,050 Network Administrator 65 Hourly $28.54 $35.68 $42.81 Annual $59,367 $74,209 $89,050 Principal Planner 65 Hourly $28.54 $35.68 $42.81 Annual $59,367 $74,209 $89,050 Safety and Risk Manager 65 Hourly $28.54 $35.68 $42.81 Annual $59,367 $74,209 $89,050 Systems Analyst 65 Hourly $28.54 $35.68 $42.81 Annual $59,367 $74,209 $89,050 Stormwater Engineer 64 Hourly $27.84 $34.80 $41.76 Annual $57,910 $72,388 $86,865 Transit Services Administrator 64 Hourly $27.84 $34.80 $41.76 (kW* Annual $57,910 $72,388 $86,865 Special Project Manager 64 Hourly $27.84 $34.80 $41.76 Annual $57,910 $72,388 $86,865 Water Utility Project Manager 64 Hourly $27.84 $34.80 $41.76 Annual $57,910 $72,388 $86,865 Civil Engineer 64 Hourly $27.84 $34.80 $41.76 Annual $57,910 $72,388 $86,865 Database Analyst 63 Hourly $27.16 $33.95 $40.74 Annual $56,496 $70,620 $84,744 Construction Manager 62 Hourly $26.50 $33.13 $39.75 Annual $55,123 $68,904 $82,685 Chief Building Inspector 60 Hourly $25.22 $31.53 $37.83 Annual $52,463 $65,579 $78,695 Management Assistant 60 Hourly $25.22 $31.53 $37.83 Annual $52,463 $65,579 $78,695 Senior GIS Analyst 60 Hourly $25.22 $31.53 $37.83 Annual $52,463 $65,579 $78,695 Senior Planner 60 Hourly $25.22 $31.53 $37.83 Annual $52,463 $65,579 $78,695 Senior Librarian 59 Hourly $24.60 $30.75 $36.91 Annual $51,175 $63,969 $76,763 Zoning Program Supervisor 59 Hourly $24.60 $30.75 $36.91 Annual $51,175 $63,969 $76,763 VP 2 JOB TITLE ISaIari Rangel Hrly/Annual I Minimum 1 Midpoint I Maximum Budget & Management Analyst 58 Hourly $24.01 $30.023 $ 6.02 Annual $49,951 $62,439 $74,926 Civil Engineering Designer 58 Hourly $24.01 $30.02 $36.02 Annual $49,951 $62,439 $74,926 Engineering Design Reviewer 58 Hourly $24.01 $30.02 $36.02 Annual $49,951 $62,439 $74,926 Special Projects Coordinator 58 Hourly $24.01 $30.02 $36.02 Annual $49,951 $62,439 $74,926 Court Administrator 57 Hourly $23.42 $29.27 $35.12 Annual $48,705 $60,882 $73,058 Plans Examiner II 57 Hourly $23.42 $29.27 $35.12 Annual $48,705 $60,882 $73,058 Water Utility Regional Coordinator 57 Hourly $23.42 $29.27 $35.12 Annual $48,705 $60,882 $73,058 Communications Specialist 56 Hourly $22.86 $28.57 $34.29 Annual $47,544 $59,430 $71,316 Constituent Services Coordinator 56 Hourly $22.86 $28.57 $34.29 Annual $47,544 $59,430 $71,316 GIS Analyst 56 Hourly $22.86 $28.57 $34.29 Annual $47,544 $59,430 $71,316 Public Information Officer 56 Hourly $22.86 $28.57 $34.29 Annual $47,544 $59,430 $71,316 Building Inspector II 55 Hourly $22.30 $27.87 $33.45 Annual $46,383 $57,979 $69,575 Economic Development Specialist 55 Hourly $22.30 $27.87 $33.45 Annual $46,383 $57,979 $69,575 Finance Analyst 55 Hourly $22.30 $27.87 $33.45 Annual $46,383 $57,979 $69,575 Information Technology Technician 55 Hourly $22.30 $27.87 $33.45 Annual $46,383 $57,979 $69,575 Parks Manager 55 Hourly $22.30 $27.87 $33.45 Annual $46,383 $57,979 $69,575 Planner 55 Hourly $22.30 $27.87 $33.45 Annual $46,383 $57,979 $69,575 Plans Examiner I 55 Hourly $22.30 $27.87 $33.45 Annual $46,383 $57,979 $69,575 Senior Accountant 55 Hourly $22.30 $27.87 $33.45 Annual $46,383 $57,979 $69,575 Water Conservation Specialist 55 Hourly $22.30 $27.87 $33.45 Annual $46,383 $57,979 $69,575 Senior Paralegal 9 54 Hourly $21.75 $27.19 $32.63 Annual $45,243 $56,554 $67,865 Human Resources Analyst 53 Hourly $21.22 $26.53 $31.84 Annual $44,145 $55,181 $66,218 Librarian 53 Hourly $21.22 $26.53 $31.84 Annual $44,145 $55,181 $66,218 Senior Civil Engineering Technician 53 Hourly $21.22 $26.53 $31.84 Annual $44,145 $55,181 $66,218 Senior Traffic Technician 53 Hourly $21.22 $26.53 $31.84 Annual $44,145 $55,181 $66,218 Senior Streets & Drainage Crew Leader 53 Hourly $21.22 $26.53 $31.84 Annual $44,145 $55,181 $66,218 3 JOB TITLE Isalary Rangel Hrly/Annual I Minimum I Midpoint I Maximum Building Permit Manager 52 Hourly $20.71 $25.88 $31.06 Annual $43,068 $53,836 $64,603 Lead Water Utility Operator 52 Hourly $20.71 $25.88 $31.06 Annual $43,068 $53,836 $64,603 Police Administrative Services Manager 52 Hourly $20.71 $25.88 $31.06 Annual $43,068 $53,836 $64,603 Administrative Assistant to Mngr& Cncl 52 Hourly $20.71 $25.88 $31.06 Annual $43,068 $53,836 $64,603 Construction Inspector 51 Hourly $20.20 $25.25 $30.30 Annual $42,013 $52,516 $63,019 Crime Analyst 51 Hourly $20.20 $25.25 $30.30 Annual $42,013 $52,516 $63,019 Administrative Coordinator 50 Hourly 19.70 $24.63 $29.55 Annual $40,978 $51,223 $61,468 Building Inspector I 50 Hourly 19.70 $24.63 $29.55 Annual $40,978 $51,223 $61,468 Deputy Town Clerk 50 Hourly 19.70 $24.63 $29.55 Annual $40,978 $51,223 $61,468 Recreation Manager 50 Hourly 19.70 $24.63 $29.55 Annual $40,978 $51,223 $61,468, Senior Zoning Inspector 50 Hourly 19.70 $24.63 $29.55 Annual $40,978 $51,223 $61,468 Paralegal II 49 Hourly $19.23 $24.04 $28.85 Annual $40,007 $50,009 $60,011 Senior Building Permit Technician 49 Hourly $19.23 $24.04 $28.85 Annual $40,007 $50,009 $60,011 Customer Service Supervisor 48 Hourly $18.76 $23.45 $28.14 Annual $39,015 $48,769 $58,522 Multimodal Planner 48 Hourly $18.76 $23.45 $28.14 Annual $39,015 $48,769 $58,522 Accountant 47 Hourly $18.30 $22.88 $27.45 Annual $38,065 $47,581 $57,097 Civil Engineering Technician 47 Hourly $18.30 $22.88 $27.45{ Annual $38,065 $47,581 $57,097 GIS Technician 47 Hourly $18.30 $22.88 $27.45 Annual $38,065 $47,581 $57,097 Heavy Equipment Mechanic 47 Hourly $18.30 $22.88 $27.45 Annual $38,065 $47,581 $57,097 Pavement Management Specialist 47 Hourly $18.30 $22.88 $27.45 Annual $38,065 $47,581 $57,097 Public Works Contracts Coordinator 47 Hourly $18.30 $22.88 $27.45 Annual $38,065 $47,581 $57,097 Senior Library Associate 47 Hourly $18.30 $22.88 $27.45 Annual $38,065 $47,581 $57,097 Streets & Drainage Crew Leader 47 Hourly $18.30 $22.88 $27.45 Annual $38,065 $47,581 $57,097 Traffic Signs& Markings Crew Leader 47 Hourly $18.30 $22.88 $27.45 Annual $38,065 $47,581 $57,097 Facilities Maintenance Crew Leader 47 Hourly $18.30 $22.88 $27.45 Annual $38,065 $47,581 $57,097 Meter Reader Supervisor 47 Hourly $18.30 $22.88 $27.45 Annual $38,065 $47,581 $57,097 Traffic Technician 47 Hourly $18.30 $22.88 $27.45 Annual $38,065 $47,581 $57,097 Water Utility Operator II 46 Hourly $17.85 $22.32 $26.78 Annual $37,136 $46,420 $55,704, Zoning Inspector 46 Hourly $17.85 $22.32 $26.78 Annual $37,136 $46,420 $55,704 4 JOB TITLE j Salary Rangel Hrly/Annual j Minimum j Midpoint j Maximum Planning Technician 45 Hourly $17.42 $21.77 $26.13 Annual $36,228 $45,285 $54,342 Aquatics Manager 44 Hourly $16.99 $21.24 $25.49 Annual $35,341 $44,177 $53,012 Courtroom Clerk 44 Hourly $16.99 $21.2425.4 $ 9 Annual $35,341 $44,177 $53,012 Development Coordinator 44 Hourly $16.99 $21.24 $25.49 Annual $35,341 $44,177 $53.012 Facilities Maintenance Technician 44 Hourly $16.99 $21.24 $25.49 Annual $35,341 $44,177 $53,012 Paralegal I 44 Hourly $16.99 $21.24 $25.49 Annual $35,341 $44,177 $53,012 Parks Maintenance Crew Leader 44 Hourly $16.99 $21.24 $25.49 Annual $35,341 $44,177 $53,012 Senior Heavy Equipment Operator 44 Hourly $16.99 $21.24 $25.49 Annual $35,341 $44,177 $53,012 Senior Office Specialist 44 Hourly $16.99 $21.24 $25.49 Annual $35,341 $44,177 $53,012 Senior Traffic Signs & Markings Worker 44 Hourly $16.99 $21.24 $25.49 Annual $35,341 $44,177 $53,012 Building Permit Technician 43 Hourly $16.57 $20.72 $24.86 Annual $34,476 $43,095 $51,714 Payroll Specialist 41 Hourly $15.78 $19.73 $23.67 Annual $32,829 $41,036 $49,244 Senior Accounting Clerk 41 Hourly $15.78 $19.73 $23.67 Annual $32,829 $41,036 $49,244 Senior Court Clerk 41 Hourly $15.78 $19.73 $23.67 Annual $32,829 $41,036 $49,244 Water Utility Operator I 41 Hourly $15.78 $19.73 $23.67 Annual $32,829 $41,036 $49,244 Senior Parks Maintenance Worker 40 Hourly $15.40 $19.25 $23.10 Annual $32,027 $40,034 $48,040 Zoning Inspection Technician 40 Hourly $15.40 $19.25 $23.10 Annual $32,027 $40,034 $48,040 Heavy Equipment Operator 39 Hourly $15.02 $18.78 $22.53 Annual $31,246 $39,057 $46,869 Human Resources Technician 39 Hourly $15.02 $18.78 $22.53 Annual $31,246 $39,057 $46,869 Legal Secretary 39 Hourly $15.02 $18.78 $22.53 Annual $31,246 $39,057 $46,869 Office Specialist 39 Hourly $15.02 $18.78 $22.53 Annual $31,246 $39,057 $46,869 Traffic Signs& Markings Worker 39 Hourly $15.02 $18.78 $22.53 Annual $31,246 $39,057 $46,869 Library Associate 38 Hourly $14.66 $18.32 $21.98 Annual $30,486 $38,107 $45,729 Lead Transit Driver 37 Hourly $14.30 $17.88 $21.45 Annual $29,747 $37,184 $44,620 Senior Public Works Maintenance Worker 37 Hourly $14.30 $17.88 $21.45 Annual $29,747 $37,184 $44,620 5 r JOB TITLE I Salary Rangel Hrly/Annual I Minimum I Midpoint 1 Maximum :Transit Dispatcher 37 Hourly $14.30 $17.88 $21.45 $44,620 Annual $29,747 $37,184 Assistant Recreation Manager 37 Hourly $14.30 $17.88 $21.45 11011. Annual $29,747 $37,184 $44,620 Accounting Clerk 36 Hourly $13.95 $17.43 $20.92 Annual $29,008 $36,260 $43,512 Court Clerk 36 Hourly $13.95 $17.43 $20.92 Annual $29,008 $36,260 $43,512 Customer Service Rep. (Water) 36 Hourly $13.95 $17.43 $20.92 Annual $29,008 $36,260 $43,512 Construction Clerk 35 Hourly $13.60 $17.00 $20.40 Annual $28,290 $35,363 $42,435 Human Resources Assistant 35 Hourly $13.60 $17.00 $20.40 Annual $28,290 $35,363 $42,435 Fleet Maintenance Tech 35 Hourly $13.60 $17.00 $20.40 Annual $28,290 $35,363 $42,435 Law Clerk 33 Hourly $12.95 $16.19 $19.43 Annual $26,939 $33,674 $40,408 Senior Office Assistant 33 Hourly $12.95 $16.19 $19.43 Annual $26,939 $33,674 $40,408 Tranist Driver 33 Hourly $12.95 $16.19 $19.43 Annual $26,939 $33,674 $40,408 Customer Service Rep. (Library) 32 Hourly $12.64 $15.80 $18.96 Annual $26,284 $32,856 $39427 Recreation Leader ' 32 Hourly $12.64 $15.80 $18.96 Annual $26,284 $32,856 $39,427 Assistant Aquatics Manager 30 Hourly $12.02 $15.02 $18.03 Annual $24,997 $31,246 $37,495 Park Monitor 30 Hourly $12.02 $15.02 $18.03 Annual $24,997 $31,246 $37,495 c Parks Maintenance Worker 30 Hourly $12.02 $15.02 $18.03 Annual $24,997 $31,246 $37,495 Public Works Maintenance Worker 30 Hourly $12.02 $15.02 $18.03 Annual $24,997 $31,246 $37,495 Office Assistant 28 Hourly $11.45 $14.31 $17.17 Annual $23,814 $29,768 $35,722 Recreation Aide 28 Hourly $11.45 $14.31 $17.17 Annual $23,814 $29,768 $35,722 Pool Shift Supervisor 24 Hourly $10.36 $12.95 $15.54 Annual $21,555 $26,944 $32,333 Receptionist 24 Hourly $10.36 $12.95 $15.54 Annual $21,555 $26,944 $32,333 Intern 23 Hourly $10.12 $12.65 $15.18 Annual $21,049 $26,311 $31,573 Library Page 22 Hourly $9.88 $12.34 $14.81 Annual $20,542 $25,677 $30,813 Water Safety Instructor 22 Hourly $9.88 $12.34 $14.81 Annual $20,542 $25,677 $30,813 Lifeguard 18 Hourly $8.94 $11.18 $13.41 Annual $18,600 $23,250 $27,900 11110100 6 Attachment C OVPD Member Benefits Current list of Police Department member benefits and/or working conditions provided through the Town of Oro Valley in addition to those described in the proposed Memorandum of Understanding effective for July 1 , 2009 through June 30, 2010. 1 . Compressed and / or flexible work week, where practical, for many assignments. 2. Take Home vehicles assigned for many positions and or assignments. 3. Paid Holidays (11 per year — 10 @ double time if worked/1 — birthday — day off). 4. Vacation Pay (96 hours — 176 hours per year, dependent upon years of service) a. those employed for 1-5 years earn 96 hours per year, accrual limit 144 hours b. those employed for 6-10 years earn 136 hours per year, kiao accrual limit 204 hours c. those employed for 11 years and over earn 176 hours per year, accrual limit 264 hours d. those employed for 20 years and over earn 176 hours per year, accrual limit 300 hours. 5. Sick leave benefits (96 hours per year) a. Members with over 480 hours sick leave can convert up to 56 hours of unused sick leave from the previous 12 months to vacation time annually b. 50 percent of unused sick leave accumulated over 480 hours will be paid out to members at the member's regular hourly rate at the time of separation from service with the Town of Oro Valley, or to the members estate if member is deceased at the time of separation from service. 6. Bereavement Leave. 7. Regular pay for up to 1 year for military reservists on Presidential call-up. 8. Coordination of Off-Duty Work (and indemnification). • Attachment C 9. 100% of members' medical insurance premium paid by Town. 10. 75% of the additional monthly premium cost for members dependent medical insurance premium paid by Town. The Town currently offers two medical plans. 11 . 100% of members' dental insurance premium paid by Town. 12. 75% of members dependent dental insurance premium paid by Town. 13. Retired members have the option of continuing medical insurance coverage at a rate made available to them through participation of the Town in rate negotiations. This includes members retired due to early, regular or disability who are not eligible for Medicare. 14. 100% Life Insurance premium paid by the Town for a policy that pays out one year of the member's salary. 15. Supplemental Life Insurance available for member where member may purchase additional life insurance up to five times the member's annual salary at a rate made available to them through participation of the Town in rate negotiations. 16. Supplemental Life Insurance is available for spouse and children at a rate made available to them through participation of the Town in rate negotiations. 17. 100% of the member's long-term disability insurance premium is paid by Town for non-ABRs participant members (benefit is 66.66% of pay in accordance with policy limitations). 18. 100% of the member's mid-term (bridge) disability insurance premium paid by the Town (benefit is 66.66% of pay in accordance with policy limitations). 19. 100% of the members' workers' compensation insurance premium is paid by the Town. 20. Extensive Employee Assistance Program (EAP) — paid by the Town. 21 . Tuition Reimbursement for members at a rate of 100% reimbursement from the Town for tuition for job-related college credit courses, up to a maximum of $2,000 per member per fiscal year. 22. Town sponsored "Section 125 Plan" (Pre-Tax contributions for Medical/Dental/Supplemental Life insurance premiums). 23. Town sponsored "Section 125 Plan" (Pre-Tax contribution for Dependent Care Reimbursement Accounts up to $5000 per Attachment C year). �► 24. Town sponsored 457 Deferred Compensation Plans (Pre-Tax contributions). 25. Town sponsored "Section 529" (Pre-Tax contribution Dependent Education Savings Plan). 26. Town sponsored Colonial supplemental insurance products a. accident plan b. short term disability plan c. cancer plans d. long term care plan e. hospital indemnity plan. 27. Supplemental Vision Care benefits (Vision Care Direct). 28. Supplemental Prepaid Legal Services. 29. Access to Credit Union (AZ Central Credit Union or VantageWest Credit Union). 30. Supplemental Commuter insurance paid by Town through AMRRP. 31 . Town administered payroll deduction for FOP/OVPOAJ100 Club Dues. Additional detailed information related to the above-mentioned benefits is available from the Town of Oro Valley Human Resources Department. MAR 131009 owe. ' � . GOLDER RANCH FIRE� I , DISTRICT 1,"'''''''‘.:11311 Fire *Rescue *Medical N 1 ,1 3885 E. Golder Ranch Drive Tucson Arizona 85739 09ANV (520) 825-9001 / FAX (520) 825-8043 Chief John Fink March 11, 2009 Mr. David Andrews, Manager Town of Oro Valley 11000 N. La Canada Dr. Oro Valley, Az. 85737 Dear Mr. Andrews: Enclosed please find an executed copy of the intergovernmental agreement (IGA) with the Town of Oro Valley to provide Fire Marshal services for the Town. The Board of Directors of the Golder Ranch Fire District was more than happy to modify the agreement to eliminate any costs to the town associated with this agreement, especially taking into consideration the current financial situation you are facing in the Town. The motion passed unanimously by the Board of Directors stated, "I move to approve the IGA with the Town of Oro Valley for Fire Marshal services. I further move that the Fire Chief be directed to request the Town consider the savings to the Town in this IGA be used to reduce potential lay offs of Town employees." Based on the Board's motion, I would request an opportunity to address the Mayor and Council at your earliest convenience to coincide with this item being placed on an agenda for the Council's approval. Sincerely, ,---) 7; ( _ / / —/-- d ^' �j -1-4- John Fink, Fire Chief Golder Ranch Fire District TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Page 1 of 2 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: 4/01/09 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: DAVID ANDREWS, TOWN MANAGER SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. (R) 09- 20 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY AND GOLDER RANCH FIRE DISTRICT FOR THE PROVISION OF FIRE MARSHAL SERVICES SUMMARY: In 1998, the Town of Oro Valley entered into an intergovernmental agreement (IGA) with Golder Ranch Fire District to provide Fire Marshal services for the Town. For this service, the Town agreed to pay Golder Ranch $50,000 a year. The basis for this compensation was that much of the Fire Marshal services required were not within the Fire District's boundaries. The IGA will be coming up for renewal this year and prior to renewing the agreement, the Town requested a change. Due to the significant number of annexations by Golder Ranch Fire District since 1999, only seven (7) square miles of land within Oro Valley remains outside of the Golder Ranch Fire District's boundaries. Given this 'nsubstantial area of land that is near completely developed, the Town requested that the IGA be renewed at ero cost to the Town. Additionally, the Oro Valley residents within the Golder Ranch Fire District boundaries pay property tax payments to Golder Ranch cover the cost of Fire Marshal service. The Golder Ranch Fire District agreed to the Town's request and the Board of Directors unanimously approved the IGA. The Board of Directors went further and moved that the Fire Chief request that the Town use the savings to reduce potential layoffs of Town employees. Fire Chief John Fink has requested an opportunity to speak on this matter and is here tonight to discuss the IGA. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution(R) 09- 20 A Resolution of the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, authorizing and approving an Intergovernmental Agreement between the Town of Oro Valley and Golder Ranch Fire District for the provision of Fire Marshal services. 2. Intergovernmental Agreement between the Town of Oro Valley and Golder Ranch Fire District for Fire Marshal Services SUGGESTED MOTION: The Council may wish to consider one of the following motions: TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Page 2 of 2 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: 4/01/09 I move to approve Resolution (R) 09- Z0 A Resolution of the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, authorizing and approving an Intergovernmental Agreement between the Town of Oro Valley and Golder Ranch Fire District for the provision of Fire Marshal services • OR I move to deny Resolution (R) 09-20 A Resolution of the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, authorizing and approving an Intergovernmental Agreement between the Town of Oro Valley and Golder Ranch Fire District for the provision of Fire Marshal services 044% David Andrews, Town Manager RESOLUTION NO. (R) 09- 20 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY AND THE GOLDER RANCH FIRE DISTRICT FOR THE PROVISION OF FIRE MARSHAL SERVICES WHEREAS, the Town of Oro Valley is a political subdivision of the State of Arizona vested with all associated rights, privileges and benefits and is entitled to the immunities and exemptions granted municipalities and political subdivisions under the Constitution and laws of the State of Arizona and the United States; and WHEREAS, The Golder Ranch Fire District ("GRFD") and the Town of Oro Valley ("Town") may contract for services and enter into agreements with one another for joint or cooperative action pursuant to A.R.S. § 11-951, et seq.; and WHEREAS, pursuant to A.R.S. 9-240(B)(7), the Town has the requisite statutory authority to provide regulations for the prevention of fires and to enforce said regulations; and WHEREAS, pursuant to A.R.S. 48-805(17), GRFD has the requisite statutory authority to enter into intergovernmental agreements for technical and/or administrative services; and sititir WHEREAS, the Town does not currently maintain a municipal fire department and therefore does not employ a Town Fire Marshal; and WHEREAS, the Town desires to provide the best possible fire prevention service for its residents; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council have determined that contracting with GRFD to provide Fire Marshal services provides for the health, safety and welfare of the Town's residents. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA: 1. That the Intergovernmental Agreement between the Town of Oro Valley and the Golder Ranch Fire District to provide Fire Marshal services, attached hereto as Exhibit"A", is hereby approved. 2. That the Mayor of the Town of Oro Valley and other administrative officials are hereby authorized to take such steps as necessary to execute and implement the terms of the Intergovernmental Agreement. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 1st day of April , 2009. F:1Emcrgcncv RespondersUGA Fire Marshal\Resolution for IGA.doc Town of Oro Valley Attomcy's Officel/arm/031609 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Ned Paul H. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Tobin Rosen, Town Attorney Date: NINO F:\Emcrgency RespondersUGA Fire MarshaRResolution for 1GA.doc Town of Oro Valley Attorney's Officc//arm/031609 • EXHIBIT "A" INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT F:\Emcrgency RespondersVGA Fire Marshal\Resolution for IGA.doc Town of Oro Valley Attorney's Office/arm/031609 MAR 1 3 .200 INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY AND GOLDER RANCH FIRE DISTRICT FOR FIRE MARSHAL SERVICES This Intergovernmental Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into this day of July, 2009 by and between the Town of Oro Valley, a body politic of the State of Arizona (the "Town") pursuant to A.R.S. 9-240 et. seq and 11-951 et. seq and the Golder Ranch Fire District (the "District") pursuant to A.R.S. 48-801 et. seq and 11-951 et. seq. for the purpose of having the District provide the Town's Fire Marshal service. This Agreement is for the further purposes of promoting the health, safety and welfare of the Town and District. Each party, through its respective governing body, officers and employees agree to take such actions as may be necessary or reasonably required to carry out this Agreement with reasonable promptness. 1. Responsibilities of the District. It will be the responsibility of the District to provide appropriately trained personnel as mutually acceptable to the Town and District to serve as Fire Marshal for the Town with full authority as Fire Marshal throughout the Town's boundaries. The District,through its Fire Marshal and other personnel shall provide the following: a. Enforce provisions of the International Fire Code as adopted by the Town(the "Code"). 411ir b. Establish a procedure and process to inspect new construction during the construction process to ensure the structure meets the approved plans and follows that procedure. Inspection comments and results shall be entered in to the Permits Plus program by the close of the following business day. c. Provide quality, responsive, thorough and courteous service at the level established by the Mayor and Council. The District shall be notified in writing of any deficiency within ten working days. d. Review plans for fire safety as sent by the Town to the District and return those plans with any recommendation or comments or correction to ensure the minimum requirements have been met in accordance with the times set forth on the attached Exhibit A. The District shall enter the recommendation or comments or correction in to the Permits Plus program and finalize the workflow. The District will be required to regularly interact with other public safety officials and agencies at the local, state and federal levels, including the Town Building Official, Public Works, Zoning, Health Department and others to ensure the construction of fire safe, code conforming buildings. e. Report to the Town possible violations and issue any citations as appropriate and consult with the Police Department, Building Safety Department and the Town Prosecutor from time to time as appropriate. f. Provide fire origin and cause investigation in accordance with nationally recognized standards for fire investigations. g. The District may elect to adopt a fee schedule for operational services. The adoption (Abe of such a fee schedule shall be implemented by the District at the District's expense and shall impose no further duty or obligation upon the Town. h. The District agrees to cooperate with the Town in accomplishing the purposes of this agreement. 2. Responsibilities of the Town a. The Town shall be responsible for initiating and following through with the development of a procedure to inspect commercial businesses based on the International Codes as adopted by the Town. b. If the Fire Marshal has any changes to be made in the areas of fire inspection for new or existing construction, the changes must be mutually agreed upon by the Town's Building Official and the District's Fire Marshal before implementation. c. The Town shall be the ultimate authority for all plan review and inspections for new construction. Interpretation responsibility for new construction will reside with the Town's Building Official with input from the District's Fire Marshal. d. The Town shall be the ultimate authority for all plan review and inspections for existing construction with input from the Fire Marshal. Interpretation responsibility for existing construction will be handled mutually between the Building Official and the District's Fire Marshal. e. The Town, specifically the Building Safety Department agrees to cooperate with the Nod District in accomplishing the purposes of this agreement. f. The Town may elect to adopt a fee schedule for review of plans and related administrative functions. The adoption of such a fee shall be implemented by the Town at the Town's expense and shall impose no further duty or obligation upon the District. 3. Recording. The District shall be responsible for recording this IGA with the Pima County Recorder's office upon approval by the District's governing board. 4. Outside Plan Review. Without effect to the terms of this agreement, from time to time, in the event of high demand for plan review, either the Town or the District may determine it is appropriate to send plans to a qualified consultant. 5. Services to be provided at "no cost"to the Town. The Town shall not be obligated to pay Golder Ranch Fire District for services pursuant to this agreement. 6. Personnel. The District shall give prompt notice to the Town of any change in the District's personnel for the position of Fire Marshal or any related staff. Town acknowledges that the District participates in mutual aid and automatic aid agreements with other fire districts and from time to time services may be provided on behalf of the District by personnel from other districts. 7. Insurance. The parties agree that they shall maintain for the duration of this Agreement policies of public liability insurance covering all their obligations undertaken in the implementation of this IGA providing bodily injury limits of not less than one million dollars for any person and not less than one million for any one occurrence and property damage liability to a limit of not less than one million. 8. Mutual Indemnification. To the extent which it legally may, each party shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the other party, its officers, departments, employees, attorneys, and agents from and against any and all suits, actions, claims, demands of any kind or nature arising out of this Agreement which results in any act or omission of the indemnifying agency, its agents, employees, or anyone acting under its direction on its behalf, whether intentional or negligent. 9. Term of the agreement. This agreement shall remain in effect for 24 months and shall renew automatically unless otherwise terminated. This agreement may be terminated by either party upon 30-days written notice 10. Notice. Any and all notices, requests and/or demands made upon a party pursuant to or in conjunction with this Agreement shall be delivered in person and deemed delivered upon receipt or by U.S. Mail and deemed given five business days following depositing in the mail, first class postage prepaid to: The Town: ‘tair The Town of Oro Valley Attn: Town Manager 11000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley, AZ 85737 With a copy to: Town of Oro Valley Attn: Building Official 11000 N. La Canada Drive Oro Valley, AZ 85737 The District: Golder Ranch Fire District Attn: Fire Chief 3885 East Golder Ranch Drive Tucson, AZ 85739 With a copy to: Donna Aversa 7440 N. Oracle Road, Building #2 Tucson, AZ 85737 • 11. parties Financing. The represent that each has sufficient funds in its budget to carry out IWO the obligations under this Agreement. Should either party fail to obtain continued funding g3 duringthe term of this Agreement or fail to appropriate or approve funds this Agreement shall be deemed terminated as of the last day such funds are available. 12. Jurisdiction. Except as otherwise specifically set forth in this Agreement, this Agreement shall not be construed to either limit or extend the jurisdiction of either party. 13. Non-Discrimination. The parties agree to be bound by applicable state and federal rules and regulations governing equal employment opportunities and non-discrimination. 14. Conflict of Interest. This Agreement is subject to the provisions of A.R.S 38-511. 15. Employee Relationship. This Agreement does not and shall not be construed to create any partnership,joint venture or employment relationship between the parties or create any employer/employee relationship between a party and the employees of the other party. Neither party shall be liable for any debts, accounts, obligations or other liabilities whatsoever of the other including without limitation the other parties obligation to withhold social security and income tax for any of its employees or to provide workers compensation coverage. 16. Third Parties.Nothing in this Agreement is intended to confer any rights or remedies to a person or entitynot a party, or the successor or assigns of a party. Nail0 17. Arbitration. To the extent legally applicable, the parties agree to use arbitration as provided by A.R.S. 12-1518 to resolve disputes arising out of this Agreement. 18. Amendments. This Agreement and the attached exhibit constitute the entire agreement between the parties. No change or addition is to be made to this Agreement except by a written amendment executed by the Town and GRFD. v r BY THEIR SIGNATURES BELOW, EACH PARTY REPRESENTS THAT IT HAS OBTAINED APPROVAL OF ITS GOVERNING BODY AT A DULY NOTICED PUBLIC MEETING. The "Town" The "District" The Town of Oro Valley Gold.' Ranch Fire District By: By: .L . 4, Its: Mayor Its: ai erson y � Attest: ./2 Its Clerk Its ? erk Approved as to form: .- 117/tA-C2i( Attorney for the Town Attorney for the District EXHIBIT A 'Rod GOLDER RANCH FIRE DISTRICT PERFORMANCE TARGETS Plan reviews shall be completed as set forth in the table below, 90% of the time. The District shall aspire to perform an inspection within 24-hours and no greater than 48-hours of the p day requested, excluding weekends and holidays, 90% of the time. q 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th+ Submittal Submittal Submittal Submittal Submittal Workflow Title Business Business Business Business Business Days Days Days Days Days Commercial New 20 20 15 15 10 2X Expedited 12 12 12 12 N/A _ 3X Expedited 7 7 7 7 N/A Tenant Improvement-Class 1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tenant Improvement-Class 2 _ 10 10 7 7 5 2X Expedited 7 7 5 5 N/A 3X Expedited 5 5 3 3 N/A Tenant Improvement-Class 3 20 20 15 15 10 2X Expedited 12 12 12 12 N/A V) 3X Expedited 7 7 7 7 N/A Fire Damage/Repair 10 10 10 10 10 Custom Home 20 20 15 15 10 2X Expedited 12 12 12 12 N/A 3X Expedited 7 7 7 7 N/A Model Home 7 _ 7 7 _ 7 7 MultiFamily Buildings 20 20 20 20 20 2X Expedited 12 12 12 12 N/A 3X Expedited 7 _ 7 7 7 N/A Notes 1. Business days are calculated from day of application. 2. Requested expedited reviews shall be approved by Building Official in consultation with Fire Marshal. Definition of Tenant Improvement Classifications are provided below. Tenant Improvement- Class 1: No Fire Plan review required. Qualifying elements: • No structural modifications(new roof loads,openings in bearing walls) • Minimal mechanical,plumbing or electrical revisions(i.e.rerouting existing ductwork with no significant increase in length,moving existing fixtures with no appreciable increase in pipe length and relocating existing electrical components) Nu) • Occupancy load less than fifty • Either a B (business office) or M (mercantile/retail) occupancy • No fire separation issues(no fire separation walls shown or required) • No changes to occupancy or building area • No changes to fire alarm and fire sprinkler plans • Require final inspection approval by the Building Safety Division and the Fire Marshal prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy Examples of businesses that could qualify in this category are: Retail shops that add only a customer service counter with cash register&display racks, exercise facility that adds only customer service counter,needs no additional toilet room(s). All Class I tenant improvements regardless of the type of business must also fall within the above guidelines. Tenant Improvement - Class 2: Qualifying elements: • Minimal structural modifications (i.e. add mechanical loads to the existing roof structure,change door/window openings,no additions to the building) • Minor mechanical,plumbing and electrical revisions(i.e. addition of ductwork, addition of plumbing fixtures,addition of electrical components which doesn't require an increase in the service) • No A (assembly), E (education), or I (institution) occupancies • No fire separation issues • Minor changes to fire sprinkler plans(relocation of heads,no additions to system) • Minor changes to alarm plans (no additions to system) Examples of businesses that could qualify in this category are: Retail shops, exercise facilities,business offices, etc., that add only a customer service counter with cash register, display racks and interior partition walls or modular office spaces that do not require additions to the fire sprinkler or alarm system are exercise facility that adds only customer service counter, needs no additional toilet room(s). All Class 2 tenant improvements regardless of the type of business must also fall within the above guidelines. Tenant Improvement - Class 3 Qualifying elements: • Structural modifications • Comprehensive building, fire,mechanical, plumbing and/or electrical review required • Fire separation issues • Changes in occupancy and/or building area • Improvement is for an A, E or I occupancy • Additions to fire sprinkler system • Additions to fire alarm system The Building Safety Permit Technicians will conduct a preliminary review using these guidelines and alert the plan review staff which classification and timeline has been selected. f r , r receivingtheplan, the plans examiner will review the plans to verify the Upon Noir classification selection. The applicant will be notified of the timeline selection. For Class 1 tenantimprovements fire marshal approval of plans will not be required. The fire marshal will verify throughinspection l ins that no changes were made or required to the fire sprinkler or alarm system prior to construction beginning. Intergovernmental Agreement Determination The foregoing Agreement between the Town of Oro Valleyand Golder Ranch Fire District (GRFD) has been reviewed pursuant to A.R.S. § 11-952 by the undersigned, who has determined that it is in proper form and is within the powers and authority granted under the laws of the State of Arizona to the party represented by the him/her. AotztLy w Donna Aversa, Attorney for GRFD Tobin Rosen, Town Attorney Date: \ Date: ‘11160, 1 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION TOWN OF ORO VALLEY MEETING DATE: April 1, 2009 K f0: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: Sarah S. More, Planning & Zoning Director SUBJECT: OV5-07-10, Matthew Moutafis, representing MSJ Investment Properties LLC., requests approval of public art component "C" for the Wingate Inn Hotel, located within the Steam Pump Village development at the intersection of Oracle Road and Hanley Boulevard. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: The proposed artwork (attached as Component C) will consist of three (3) 30" x 30" original oil paintings. The paintings will be placed in three separate locations in the hotel building (front desk back wall, breakfast area and lounge/lobby area (see attached renderings for specifics). The paintings will be secured on the wall with mounting hardware. ART REVIEW COMMISSION (ARC) RECOMMENDATION: The ARC reviewed the proposal on September 4, 2007. The artwork for the Wingate Inn Hotel consisted of three components (A - C) and the committee recommended unanimously(4 - 0)the following: • Approval of the horse sculpture (Component A) with conditions. • Denial of the proposed interior fountain (Component B) consisting of the mosaic tile work. • Continuance of the oil painting(Component C)until more detailed information is provided. The artwork must be resubmitted for ARC review/approval. The Council approved the horse sculpture(Component A) on October 3, 2007. Component B was eliminated from the proposal and the applicant recently resubmitted the oil paintings (Component C) for ARC review/approval. The ARC recommended approval of Component C on March 3, 2009. BACKGROUND: OVZCR Compliance: Based on the building construction costs, the applicant must provide a total of $50,000 for public art. The artwork for the previously approved horse sculpture is valued at $48,000. The outstanding balance of$2,000 will be covered by this proposal. In sum, the project meets the 1%requirement as specified in the Code. Current Site Conditions: • The project is located within Phase 2 of the Steam Pump Village Development. • Zoning: Steam Pump Village Planned Area Development. • There are a total of four pads in this phase. Two buildings (Chili's Restaurant and California Design Studio)have already been constructed. • Additional artwork will be required for the remaining phases (3 & 4) TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 2 NodProposed Improvements: • The total building area for Phase 2 of this development is 103,250 square feet. The Wingate Hotel is approximately 57,200 square feet. • Office/Studio lofts are proposed on the last remaining pad south of the Hotel. Approvals to Date: • At their regular meeting of September 4, 2005, the Town Council approved the development plan for this phase. • At their regular meeting of October 3, 2007, the Town Council approved the public art (Component C) for this proposal. SUMMARY OF FACTORS; Factors for: 1. The ARC recommended approval. 2. The proposal meets the requirements of the OVZCR. Factors Against: 1. None. SUGGESTED MOTIONS: -.400/ The Town Council may wish to consider one of the following suggested motions: I move to [approve, approve with conditions, OR deny] OV5-07-10, Public Art proposal Component C for the Wingate Hotel, located within phase 2 of the Steam Pump Village Development. ATTACHMENT: Public Art Submittal cc: Matthew Moutafis Project Manager: David Ronquillo, Senior Planner I 1 I p Jr v ...rah S. More, Planning and Zoning Director • .,.., .i „,_..._. ,, 6,c.I_,.._...,__..i ae J Wats , Assistant Town Manager David Andrews, Town Manager Nomid F:\OV\OV5\2007\0V5-07-10\TCreport4-1-09.doc 0 -- Le-c------.- Ti ,...„,.., ,...._....„:,... , C.) > 1.... Cid 1. C) 1 CID > 400.., I ',, , '• 1,••••,,, CN:4 0 ""j ' •orr,'''''—:, '''Pi ."'"'"s.-........_ t-.1 ki. itt ., ., • IT st:10.....3 ....... ii.....1 03 CCI = .4...0 a) . ..., - $...• ,.O ....e < ,..., +.0 C4) e.,., C.) .. 4.4 ,, 1-4 ct tor)......g ..—• C.) cf1 ,......) 1, ' '' • ,,," 'N•...., 411.9 .......• Ct= •.4... = Ci ...• Ct C1) = ••.0 ,i.,..., . .4 * ' tm:1) LL, 4 +...., •i: I) (1.) ,.....s 41 su....." ..= ,.= .4 4—, a) ..... 4—, ,.., ... z = cd e-, v) cn ..., , . >°. "d '"" ..,C fl) 11) .=,e V 0 •r..0 ,,,,,,,. f,, - • 0 0 a/ • • cn ,-. , citzi -'...; (..,) — a-4 p...i ,...... I = CA Cio ..-4 ,, .. ..... L.). 0 . L TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: April 1, 2009 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: Sarah S. More, Planning & Zoning Director SUBJECT: OV12-05-03B, Oro Valley Sunway LLC, represented by SBBL Architecture and Planning, requests approval of a development plan for the Homewood Suites hotel and retail/restaurant buildings, located within the El Corredor development in proximity to the northeast corner of Oracle Road and Linda Vista. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: A development plan was approved for the El Corredor property in 1991. This proposal will substantially reconfigure the northern portion of the previously approved plan; therefore, a new development plan is required. A Homewood Suites hotel and retail/restaurant buildings are proposed as part of this phase (3). The development will consist of a hotel building and retail/restaurant pads, totaling 109,200 square feet in size. The zoning of the property is C-1, Commercial. The project conforms to all general plan, zoning and conditional use permit conditions. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD RECOMMENDATION: At their regular meeting of January 13, 2009, the Development Review Board (DRB) voted (4 - 0) to approve the development plan for this project. No major issues were addressed by the DRB (see attached minutes for specifics). BACKGROUND: Nature of Application: • The development plan stage involves resolving all design and site layout issues related to zoning requirements as well as specifications of all reviewing agencies. Once recommendations are made by staff, the development plan is reviewed by the Development Review Board (DRB), which in turn forwards the application with its recommendation to Town Council. Development plan approval constitutes authorization for the developer to proceed with the engineering plans and specifications for public improvements, as well as the building permit process. Site Conditions • The El Corredor site is approximately 19.7 acres and will consist of four total phases. Phase 3 consists of 8.71 acres and is located on the northern portion of the site. With the exception of the existing office building on the northwest corner, the site is vacant and undeveloped. • The vegetation on the site consists primarily of native Mesquite and Palo Verde trees. Proposed Improvements • The maximum building height is 25 feet. The proposed building height is 25 feet; however, architectural low elements will exceed this height. The code permits architectural elements to exceed the maximum TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 %id building height up to 10' as approved by the Development Review Board. The DRB approved a building height up to 32' - 6" in height for these features (in limited areas). • 123 hotel rooms, meeting area and pool/courtyard area. • The existing office building will be demolished as part of this phase. • Adequate parking and circulation have been provided. • Pedestrian connections have been established to the adjacent commercial buildings. • All mitigation elements to insure neighborhood compatibility, as required by the approved conditional use permit have been incorporated. Approvals to Date: • In 1991, the Town Council approved a development plan for the entire El Corredor site. Since this approval, the designs of various phases have significantly deviated from the original plan; therefore, new development plans have been required. • In 2006, the Town Council approved a conditional use permit for the Starbuck's drive through. • In 2007, the Town Council approved a conditional use permit for the Homewood Suites hotel. • In 2007, a development plan was administratively approved for phase 2 (two retail buildings). It was in substantial conformance with the plan approved in 1991. • In January 2008, the Development Review Board approved the landscape plan for phase 3. • In January 2008, the Development Review Board approved the architectural elevations for the hotel building. Surrounding Land Uses: Orientation: Zoning: Land Use: North C-1, Commercial District Proposed retail buildings and Homewood Suites hotel South PS, Private Schools Pusch Ridge Christian Academy East R1-43, Single Family Residential Pusch Ridge Estates Subdivision West C-N,Neighborhood Commercial Undeveloped (across Oracle Road) ANALYSIS OF OVZCR 22.6B DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CRITERIA: "In considering any application for development review, the Development Review Board shall be guided"by a specific list of criteria when deliberating. The following is a list of noteworthy criteria (in italics) followed by staff commentary: 1. The Development Review Board shall examine the application to insure that all provisions of this Code and all other Codes, master plans, general plans and standards of the Town shall be complied with where applicable. F:\OV\OV 12\2005\12-05-03B\reports\TC.report4-1-09.doc TOWN OF ORO VALLEY "OUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 3 of 5 A. GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE: This commercial project is in general conformance with applicable General Plan policies. Noteworthy General Plan 2020 policies are listed below. Policy 2.1.4, "The Town shall require that all development proposals depict an arrangement of and massing of buildings and/or arrangement of lots to minimize impacts on views from adjacent properties and streets and from properties and streets internal to the proposed project while providing privacy for residents. " Policy 11.3.1, "View protection is to be an essential aspect of development review and project approval. " The site is relatively flat and the development has been designed to minimize building dominance as viewed from Oracle Road and the adjacent properties. There are single family residential homes located along the east side of this property and the following mitigation measures have been provided to minimize development impacts: substantial building setbacks (98 feet from property line), a dense vegetative buffer yard (30 feet wide) with screen walls and low profile lighting (limited to 8 feet in height) at the rear of the building. Furthermore, building parapets and mechanical equipment screens are required to shield views from the adjacent properties. B. OVZCR COMPLIANCE: The development plan is in substantial conformance with all applicable OVZCR requirements. ertinent Code Requirements Section 27.7& 27.8, Off Street Parking and Loading — Passenger drop off areas and loading zones have been provided to serve each building adequately. Section 27.6E&F, Buffer yards and Screening—Adequate buffer yards have been provided along the perimeter of the property in accordance with code requirements. Section 24.5, Oracle Road Corridor Overlay District (ORSCOD) — The project conforms to all setback, view corridors and landscape standards of the ORSCOD. C. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT COMPLIANCE: The following neighbor conditions as agreed to by the applicant have been addressed on the development plan and landscape plan: 1. An 8' high screen wall and dense vegetation (overlapping tree canopy) be achieved along the eastside property line. No openings for pedestrian access through the wall. 2. Vegetation to be provided on the east side of the wall to soften views. 3. Lighting at the rear of the hotel to be low profile lighting. 4. No dumpsters to be located along the east side property line. 5. Lighting to be limited to eight feet(8')in height at the back portion of the property. he aforementioned items have been added as general notes on the plan. 161" F:\OV\OV 12\2005\12-OS-03B\reports\TC.report4-1-09.doc TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 4 c misi? D. PUBLIC WORKS COMMENTS: Traffic The existing roadway network adjacent to this project will be improved to accommodate an expanding traffic volume and to provide increased safety for motorists. Improvements to Linda Vista Boulevard by the El Corredor project includes pavement widening and the addition of raised medians for right/left turn lanes. Furthermore, the Arizona Department of Transportation is currently under construction with the Oracle Road (State Route 77) Widening and Improvement Project which includes the Oracle Road frontage adjacent to this project. Drainage The existing on-site and off-site stormwater patterns consist of sheet flow, generally draining from the southeast to the northwest. Two earthen channels will direct off-site stormwater drainage around the perimeter of the project site. The eastern channel will discharge into a storm drain which will direct the stormwater back into a natural swale located along the northern perimeter of the project. The southern channel will discharge into a storm drain which will direct the stormwater into a detention basin on the western perimeter of the project. On- site stormwater runoff is conveyed through the site and into the detention basin by utilizing parking area access lanes (PAAL's), catch basins, curb openings, and storm drains. The detention basin will release stormwater at levels below pre-existing conditions. First flush treatment is incorporated into this project and consists of multi-purpose catch basin inserts design(„id to capture sediment, debris/trash particles, and oils/grease from the parking lots and PAAL's. Grading A Type 2 Grading Permit will be required to construct building pads, retaining walls, drainage structures, utilities, parking lots, and any other structures requiring grading on the project site. All grading will conform to the Zoning Code. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENT: This project has been noticed in accordance with Town procedures, which include the following: • Property owner mailing for all directly affected residents within 300' of subject parcel. • HOA mailing. • Post property. • Post at Town Hall and on the web. During the conditional use permit process, residents raised several issues regarding the design of the east side buffer yard,building/parking lighting and noise nuisances. The applicant provided mitigation as incorporated in the conditional use permit. To date, all the issues have been addressed on the development plan and landscape plan. No further comments have been received from the surrounding property owners. F:\OV\OV12\2005\12-05-03B\reports\TC.report4-1-09.doc TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 7OUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 5 of 5 SUMMARY OF FACTORS: Findings in Favor: 1. The Development Review Board recommended approval. 2. The development plan meets all applicable General Plan policies. 3. The development plan meets all OVZCR requirements and design guidelines. 4. All resident concerns were previously addressed as part of the conditional use permit process. 5. Meets all conditions as specified in the conditional use permit. Findings Against: 1. None. SUGGESTED MOTIONS: . The Town Council may wish to consider one of the following suggested motions: I move to [approve, approve with conditions, OR deny] OV12-05-03B, Applicant's request for a development plan for the Holmewood Suites hotel and retail/restaurant buildings, subject to the conditions specified in Exhibit A. attachments: . Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval 2. Exhibit B - Technical Deficiencies 3. Development Plan 4 DRB meeting minutes dated January 13, 2009. cc: Don Culbertson, Fax 913-345-2444 Bob Lara, Fax: 620-0535 Project Manager: David Ronquillo, Senior Planner Ail f A tr'eja-gos,m. e, Pl g & Zoning Director Craig alier, Town Engineer i-♦Fl:.a'['e Ya\(-.:.4:.. ..^iA iK>.tA.JAf4:f-...a:'r: .•II..Nir.. Jerene Watson, Assistant Town Manager fr'-David Andrews, Town Manager tor F:\ov\ovi2\2005\12-05-03B\reports\TC.report4-1-09.doc EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - - OV 12 05 03B EL CORREDOR 1. An 8' high screen wall and dense vegetation (overlapping tree canopy) be achieved along the eastside property line. No openings for pedestrian access through the wall. 2. Vegetation to be provided on the east side of the wall to soften views. 3. Lighting at the rear of the hotel to be low profile lighting. 4. No dumpsters to be located along the east side property line. 5. Lighting to be limited to eight feet(8')in height at the back portion of the property. EXHIBIT.B TECHNICAL DEFICIENCIES OV12-05-03B EL CORREDOR 1. Address all redlined comments within the Development Plan and Drainage Report Addendum. 2. Revise the grading design adjacent to the southeast corner of the hotel so that a maximum 411109 4"water harvesting depth will occur within the defined ponding limits shown on the plan. Also, label the invert elevation of the water harvesting basin for clarity. 3. Revise the Drainage Report Addendum and the Development Plan keynotes so that all referenced information correlates from one to the other. Also, the civil engineering registrant shall stamp the drainage addendum with their seal prior to the final certification submittal. , U a. u N . T.; al H g, mix :g - ,_„! I ;-' 1 1. F- E ' ,F, t§ m ir r:g a gQ iqW N IN o a n_ oO _. * . d > mQ Z = P b>� 80 .Q^' e 'Pi � Coo y r gP O > "W-1 1 O , P ,erN-+ 0 m N .. :, q •288 OR NCCNRoR'4,;, >. wip IZ Z lq N WO Z; E ;,,i! ii i _ > mg 10; r m 0 t! 171 >O•� g_ ;-'g7f0f�1g _.og.r_� $ NN�8 _ m • N (>A�$ r8QQQ� WizErs oX Psip- Qb\�� 6 Nj�.i"+i 8N pN i R AC'4 g Z Z7 0; al <' --.§_ C ; t0_"$y +Og �/f y =� i0 O u ref A j �-� �� � �n " UV vo, � r� O ••�� _ 8 B x. C7 < C��� �QQ O�� N(i,V� 0.TO \ N §c-E— V,NC O 0 pF ° C>G1 To y7 /' *Imp rc?, ,vE iie 0, �m1 u! cNi, f^ !4!), 3'NN �. q X7;41 4 fphZ� N��1 m10 C� N Vl K • '1 '6 A /rte , p O 1.i 0 <C N .Z ,C N N a ,J Qi�zmsy ^' hf m .., SI 115 4 U O ?? OD V ON, V, N N P.2 isz 1 O, Cr ; 4 [d C� R1� � Q � � ((>�7�� � �2� W �a ' ��ZS Q� �1� O:Z1 ZO ��••''�j� y�•D gi` SS /�1 m IP C) iN <N ZZN AR 4g; m Ei ; M > t'l .1A Peg q6 � g�C1 : gG� *, . 130 M O. XS Igi : gym; lig E. ti m 3 . �_ o� : it q V , li o> r s F `°A`� v mu v c� �v c >�' > 2 ti o 81M '1 R R Ag ; qi 52 gpu, E 2 '.'W C < II2 r O m X �rS4L4g $ .S o ml „ O F F o$ v *-,m $ i�y ,0 It x r g 0 x 9 !gx $ i g $�, 4c, " g > gd y p C I� I� � � ,+ . 0 0 S6 `1 fA�f 8 Fi 4� §CO LN E tI 9> r+1 .' g rli; O;ms.R 1.-2 >Z iO r_ g .Tl 6-(5 n C N > C v Z Z Q y g . MN N . I Si 110 -§ - , a q ,d '1 0 ' E 4 X s0 Ai 'AM R T e Q8 P yK + • S 44 0 n v 9 O - '4 - ¢ v O M T 9/ PEll --3 i5, • oi z 3 S N Q O R , 0 m - -.° N • „ E -1 W iia Z 73 › >z0 +ImOAmy s1tii t2_,1 l J g o O nA > O= j >N v o-+� 1��> Z Z O Ell ili ..1 v N -ti o E • Ori 0A•tg i i A 2 ,, A FR_ .- mn FR e Mt M g (Q�Vf OD -< Z N I 0 > . r ma ! „„ �/pf � !Q� cm o (Q� m % 849. :NW '" i cg ., hi ,8 aa0 _, xi ri I > i �j s § Ro ; < Cj 0 - E,,m N -j�j N A v 0 O cn P68L F+� 5g� w Z . . 1 Z!N i > 0 + Z N q N 8M 0 ���; E 4 (� C q g' � rpo� mO � N 33 Zi, q2 E q r i ' g. 8 ., T xs-r, 2, - ; i z -4 m— C fit8 mm ,x, g rs 1.,_ M pp' : 0 Rig �j 0 ZO� r fy O � G tr A�0 ill OP0A > Z A f7 i7�pp �- N Z)1 mP AP ,2 q 0 g. ii a v+ a 6 �i I- 2 g o-moo V,:►4 N � T i� a J W _ Z O ,,,,,„,,g n► 1. > i V ”,),2 Z ,g, P,,I Rn; o < —4 o -1 'p° g O or6 wgW g < g i IR g i s !;,4 ,t,t +1 '1.1(ii. 1 O' il ti2 • - P g Ni 37 i 1.,1;i-,i : r t., PEg (4' i F i 4 > . 1 0 `, d�1 7vj� ,7� g , � - p� 0;._;'-,ii - . > F O i f -2 cu-7,g gi2 DE IPV:..,„ AFAR, � ` o ' O Opo5,E g r !QYogqr5 � \ 4_'�i9.1 z ;5 \/ ,� g p - QQ s '7"g4 ' 1 - ,1 a--'s g 61t.4 - ,1 il. A'cl X ' 11 h; .,.4,1441 -0 E . ? §% tig 0 i ! ; DEVELOPMENT PLAN ❑ Design Review y ECIEUME , la�N,g EL CORREDOR II Agency Submittal 9 D 1 4 b 1 g HOTEL AND RETAIL ❑ Bidding/Pricing Package NORM ORACLE ROAD Ili MAR 0 9 2009 ORO VALLEY,ARIiA L -- -- Town of Oro Valley..! i ., 8 ail +J ç ! N _ *-‘g k• \ \\__ \_ }3......s\ I ._-- \��- '�� -'tom _ _ N :, i ii .:ii ilk._r___ _____/ ---__________ _ `\ m_ `tom -41_-- LII All" _AJt... ------.-----_-- ,, .... . 1 If — — —_`�' - X14 •;: - - _ -�� i , E iii----_:.------,---_-_-_. -- - --- --- --- ,.. '.._ .-ile.%•- ?;:, — ______--4 (. ----____-_-,==-,---,7-::=_-_-_---L.:-5-06-3,. . t,,,i :.. .5 ����✓ R-5829.58 _ -+ � "_---. .),A4 \ 1�►ii a ` L1-04.5945 •r....,,•,,. .., _,_- -� `/�1 i_ 1 km,'/I��'-._V-_--.!...-.70-' ''''.41,"1"-z--",-'-.� `C► .r��.• _ Y = _.-..-•��� �1 1•-.....!—.1;,----2.--_—_,.-,_1 � ��j'�y__ O IAI..� II �1 � filiWta—,;,-.67-1____ ,� 1 i tE.Ii■ .._ arm _ __ x i�� - N II I r''�pu`� � _ "D �i1���•- '` �1. , N , 11 _ 7 �> x•,o a's.a,.mil s7.- i= _ •-t`` �, - ia! ,o A x :I, ---w ,=Y. ,,-; •o ( ���i i-+•K a'"' m, .;.i,:.-Ir.Eai.,-.;;,.. • II -� ; �' iy� y fe ,`t' ES 1- 1)1- •1 i +�= tt1• ► v > I U S 'il r.,..-► -:o" ,I I IIIE' �m � ►ii ;_ F � -`nil ill G1 �• m 117i I II � liji%::;,,,,,,.,,___„„.„..,--4,1 � �A��N m� 111 J �� �- W> ----- � ��Tk r� "�.tii � i'II III. r_ii_ a P. —.a_ , I F� m 1�� r!<I fa � 1. N ��ri�.ry '�' �� 4 � -- �__ { •',.„._.._--7--._..,;=,_:.:..,. ,� `r» a �r/ � �_ ulit_ , v. It: .Ta , [j1► :'t�/An..."." - -- 7b,:-��il'16„ -■ iit .„,,. ., . `I..'j1'w �r i<: ..... . �_ _.I ' I.��i� ,. 4 M Aft- ,. y x4, �1 a �. 1'3,1 ... , --_ 7. w .= lis,-__,- --i=„,,,za,-N., . ,:,. ,, -.2.-4;6,-4-4,-0,1.1 III ill.i, i, . — _ k '.1'• II , 11I► _ �4 � � i gol--_z�--_ _ �^ Atop,: , 17110-1.. 1 L, 11 ,_ .4._#7. 1 !t:: :1111101ite.. °III g". 7-- 3--- - W4' 7.17— .. -,- NI - , As -,„p Al 0,',.li - i M OW 011 Ill ill-- II: .. __ --- \bN.,�� N�cnIli MIIII ?r i rt _ DC7, A� Ill _;- :1 1 la °,1.1 _, ' .4,'-"' --111;\ .Ciki.. — E W 2'_l — a _ �.:. :. _ - _ .--- _.0,------------\ ,/ 'I ). 0 i ...,, , , bq ( Sii"lb't-- - i 1 i lc, ,-- -- ._ -`moi I 815 1 �',� r, + x.1 I F �'� E:::i-N -\--------- r, I AI , ` I /,•� R-';.II.. .4 ( x. - 0.! P , .---- 4, f, * 16.NI ,P g 1 4 7 . .7.11;11 Allip'Theefila - --, 1! � e - 1 't • �� �� ( __--- $ 4-. I'' 1àk I m � ■eCRr► .■ ■ ■-.�■■ ■■ ■ er � :�3.�,.�. -..S.--.."..7.,..73,4;17741911A„,4fir '. � �`"n, ,-,- : � �'I P m: E}:, 'Lit.�t:��.*4ys�- ��}i.sy..T;�t¢q.�r•�+,�i4�j� � I..: �, � ���� ^r p jJ N y {y t! �j y; iL' / _ � , �, II r.�931►%tiii i�Bl ��'� f63.i�dYsi.� i9i�?t33a���Es» � _ � ��\�G= �v ��.00'_'_______.111.� 1__�: 1 IIIi ■,I_III III II .I 1, II L.C.■ Ill 111,I I i l_ h w / �- _ '"°°•°may'i9 s t= a go :_- _, M ..... ".-z-----,\----;:=-7--- ,al 4 IL ` / o 0 i,0../7---‘-----'?. .--:---7-M16 '----- -.-'- ----'. -gy .1116\- -----14\-- " --,: 7, tikkil ?? /. 7 iii l.:7- 4`.7. lie Dye _ ` 1� .I� 'R )///--,/O a;,�4 Yy •- -:, i NOS ‘\ i .. Yti, _ - \ 1 1/ '''',. %4K\i/ 0 i \ -:4,111 .-- Illilik....41111 I.1-'?? 1 \\/A' lig Ar ,\\°I. � n R • -ea. S mo- ;A HIGH/JAY,N R.1`,74 -- � TUCSON-FLORENCE EN $ 7 )r OORACLE >o 0 1O '11 !'',,,..!-; 113.1 (: � ON Z _L-508.30'R_� 59.�0r.1Ni m�yxDm 8 ,' 1 i` 0 0 + , =' o"D- r a , - , a 8 I '•• -•rt•t. J � g�-d N D soi T w oo, a • • • :: ".. V coir I cg4 OTm o i N (' c�Y i n n C1 i�H§ 74 r. ___) III �' 2 O io O tiLil g ^'p�p Z< F.4 ;F , .1•' SU.F:111?)45i 4 1 tfi,t g u tL U'� ZN>D � �Ar �gjr < C 5 i.1..•t � � m 2 y 1Om/1� Z � � � ,N m�.� mol Nis „q A § Vcoy, s N O i zwo 5,,i§a B g v. i� Z Z 2< Z QQ y -i 8 0 m ,io- N = "111 C 7Cm I '� ' i `Cm j,pzT 8I a mid A,nvz,-D m `,.! P A N� wit ,•i•.? •• • s�O� f^�O C Li, z .,-,. Z �� 4D c;,,41 to (l� � i� ,.1•'`• I •'•~��:..• N�Os I ;I $ m -' R Z +o �Gin r ozz ::,_ 1•` t �m ao N $ ��,�c+ (.4 8 m Q �.. ,.✓ T1p t7~ i ♦ u ri n Nuf rlaI+ ' ° ` 173.' R rima > m . N i- 8 rri r- I 0 7 � � - .p O � �r(7 8 cPi,, .-(3), v � r.t NN�R � v il 'li -I _� O rr-1F mZ z p I 5 m u �o ar9I 1 �_Ito N Z ��Z li Oil e;`,� €.,1 rl71 CA . N T < rci. p<ig * a --rB A i i L. 'r.,4 0% I V, tilNipk.,I 1111 N z o <DQ F'm � ,1 1 .-.-; W ;4- §N I 32 _ ,760C E•60C 3_t.,Z0.00 S - W _ t O�� � f- N ' 1- N o Q F., �,o p i 4 1 DEVELOPMENT PLAN ❑ Design Review Agency Submittal N i'g EL CORREDOR • p 1U HOTEL AND RETAIL 0 Bidding/Pricing Package • g NORTH ORACLE ROAD ORO VALLEY,ARIZONA — _ J -T.,----- -----. .--=7:- ---L--L--*--.---------7-----,-----'-------- .---- - 1 V=-- I r•-:-.1 il 7— — 7 g -. uf----- — --- ________— im,_._______,, _____ 0 "� \ c--E Raw -- �f'~-- �� ' -_--- Li I LA Vg >E P V _-Niaos �� -�� it r: ; g a i --- 4 , O 1 svT.710 -. ,t iii g.E► - ..' y�� \ 1 ` J , f7""' SIG _ ' $ _gl I-�/ ,4 111' 1 1 11' s it r -17- ' 0 17��y���lur =�D ©8.582958 j3` +►sem . I ii, : stew �'' I �� i,.o.��..'..►inII sv..-l>'u�_�_. _ 3'gr,,,+�" -+'- i' --_-,,-44. Ley (/ rr�� �1 I�] yy 1�1, .��....rte � i', ���"� �� �-064.0011 ��..�� 1 i `` a 02s a 2S C Q Q link=iiiar:".r4 r 8 /j I,^ iif��------ 011 1 .. ice i ,.;G •� 412i�llf if .: SS fE m i' ij n��a:���aa�►�rr:� ►©:' tJ ca. ��T�... ��``4i,* I1I © ©x 1 /n�y y��y���(n N� p/•1 I ,� -i-i. 1 ©�� I` s�. �. _ .�.i,.■ j,lyd7.� �® © '�.5, _.. .- >>-6' y' i A n C t g I ''o 'impTi it, tt C51--��� d z1; N y 4 g --., Ig-, mIgmM - —Iptiji;l'''''',117414,- [���, �./�`'�`1.~ l nor m 4?ri.,,,w. -04 e 0-- 0 ie,',',..:43-1--) ,-,------'?' ',, 1?-. I' 1 ci V ©I ©�C4-1-1,4ewrscinai�Ma u�let M�4�:,'1. •�, � •���1-�rt'wair '}�-- 115 1 `I�[ii ®R O ul 1 iii{ O ® e d I r - • ��a��seas or �ti` `r �.a y �4 11 L I L ..� <>� > y,0 \N fp-�16 c {g� g.! r ► b„ f„f IgitP.W6a\`�� 1 : Ri S -_ N /, ,;',: , l'W al *,,,,,IV -41 $0 'xo,g I', 1 1 ( -01P1- i 0.-0 .1 7:Vr p/r 1 1[:i. — i'7K �; 'y s w�r, r / 1 ` ,.. ,::-C.,1 ..:-:. .-..- --',3.6ril•I -4 0:i'l 'i • -1'' .-:-A g rI,i.,',..:*5 ,, 0 ' CI • - Effilil .1- `,.. ...11,dila, :,, ____:_______Liitel. . . - • ,.:PAO• , Ii,,e 1 ignill4i a .,o 5, 'ota. N A, I Q.�`.0 �'; I ir,, n 1 d A '''441' ► iW-1 „,,a�>leel_aw2esw.. ,..� t ;i gyp. to saw s- e S T R f 3 Y; rt !�\ �n��.�.. Q 1 �In`] ir---UAF- -. ` ��.A a.-aim 1.1a1 I AI� we 3tki . ,,,,gyp g' '614 0 I l��� i rl z -i_, . a ,lit-'.. 101 '. 0 1 0 i< H m' 4 m '#' -� oriog�1 �y ( I_� \ ilei cs' I++ �► -FF � - b■ZI `k.!I II��� I. F•' \ � � �j/// ---�� 0 ..4 fes' ��I i��_ A li • � logipfr.___. 4er---- I Ai —�, ■1l,a�,.�:`�' `'1.:j it �y000000000000000 A , _ -, Pt” 11\ ,,,,,,N,g g g4i im NI it72:-.t.:4:1,,L'',..% ___ — 0 ; wwi -Nlilp. ,, m ( -l'gds' �' ,lien _---- R 1 l 1 4� (::: © _, e,_ilxgoit mcg -, Nog , :ii 0 ;mg \,_. 4kiiv , .= a• _ Ardi 7,00.00 ,,v,,,,..., JO 11 11 ,,. ti lib a' i i f.-:� 94, ®' �' Cie:'0, olibb - - T R i I .•A --: al - ° 0,1° r N \ PI NA!i 1 4,,i , 1 .: • . $ ° 111-Cs ri, . .. ,,,, ,_-_ .__ _,... I NED. :Iiii ; / Wiligp .i lill iiij „ya 1 1.�%.1.t!ii,',,,li o ® , ,\ ,,,,in cs Pi ��f / 'N't F. es :a es : . i O' 57'! . ---.- a ' OIFr 1 - -i Awe be,Ud i„,..$.11M41UatlIll ,K.M.,,,..,..........._. ^' O ®®®®®®®® 0® ��. 1. I ”' »�::.._.�«.. i.:.e..: Ci :�� irAimow,,:dmizaturs-da 1111k ' r `,'tgi�. ,-, ....., -..="ilin. li g;1'iii 5q 1 v q P H! ; _ _.,,,....- -.6-...imiii.ii..d..±........m.malwi•rillre-"1....... ....,,..:..:.....,,:.73-71,„h2dlirr, P © e ,.0271T'E-309. Mr% -©//I�/���1'srrrrrrrr,MMO T (�Qip'(I Q y Y� .P 1 1 n \, V5.` -f,` /; , t g"o -:/\ \ � , moi^ Ek1,-, a ,f(?---).-/-\ if ------ ,y/ NI ------ 41 \sit -',1-i;./ 1 ?1.i. �, \,,/7/�$ :i ---,_____J Ai I l' )2771 it'--, ili----/77/ ----- ' ,, ,r-k_ oWomn 1,165 o 51 _ ' - zr :i.,,-,,,g- < .3S ,4ng1 § >v,OIn a f, f, --- )I _ •i , E rr,-e 2 ii ii ! • ,- te- =/- A4gp. > - --_,----=,_--!----- ---„,___„,----- �" Ir:z....: t —_ r� _,:rF C , i Ap./wIi:` ' • ___N + (:::1,. n Z a- ;ft -:\ IV\ , i 6 !,,, • Z'="'-'-:firiii":;,.....----• - - • ' fry,i g 2 ,.__, • :-... 0 --i-Tilliiial _-, .,,-- Aor-s-,--1( I I , -,.:'''',2. — 12 g 0 il VIIIUS.-WW.M.-- V.2 A-. lr �I O g I< ---- .tom ,�-,,i 1 __ ,;) 1 ,- ,22d N 3r7:‘• z _'C��`a Z '• ,fY_�.'„j.•,#ie"1'I'-<•.''•-+;rs..r„ h ,s. 'l• •ifi.M-+:.^-.. i Z- i -t,_ --17-- --:'Vir' ---\FT B-- 1).,F-1 j4.0 il 1" W'''lla liti 1 - --\--- i P • DEVELOPMENT PLAN ❑ Design Review _,_L .��io ^��/a`� T-----..„\::„\-,-- r�_\; Agency Submittal 7/� ,, ,.,.._....- --2,,V-.1,-,-..\ � , I ��I 1 i w La 4 EL CORREDOR g y ❑ Bidding/Pricing Package �1 yn. _�4 ^'t}, ' `°"'.'t" s(44'``>�N' I I y/ p g HOTEL AND RETAIL ��: pl,..,-.�. �. �...1- � _a . .- �' NORTH ORACLE ROAD ORO VALLEY,ARIZONA 11 M A NM.a CIC �v'~I` >sIi ;11 e3 a' 22.r§• +�aw, ff �t=!�--7.�t�.i•�� i� . : � (1 rint""I•. N d I� a� - .f .7�C•..lfff +u7a: ummiw .r ,���..+ .",>_� 9 'f__ •Ntic Ldi e'--' lii_''' -7r .w:Y - l/s ÷ f q _ it1: �l _ `,Y ro � I . l � ; —wwwwI . a , _��-fel I:�5 1 �.` .. •, O r� 11 Ant?■�:0 `o r-1-- ;� c.�►:��� C:3+�, .it - �.1 I •• 0 .+ati 4 Yq;l O O .�_•6t9Z •4.1/11111.....-- , y�lF WZot© I ,7 I i� n lit. / U����\ ���;�/f •��/�_r= 2650 .1:011:44:77, �1�'.-I.,,���i` ' � , /• � i�i I T :•ti cli'lliaiillg.:-' s:�sNv:."R7@.=+tomz,s:s. _. _7, vc. � �•-► -'1' _., � �611'!-•�_•• ~� IT i •i .$-1 ' ��r�i ,r SS I ,-...1,,..,; /4"1-,,,,- n, .\�^S: ;�I fQ� 1© SIV ' I It '1� 1' ` IT i 1 fes'- I I® f# > l , �n�' l? `I 3 -,-S i�) S r� c ( 45"gs °` 2t int Lii cj bT ;i 1 'ir',L.:),w.... r-�« w , / �.r 1" Sii L''.�(� p'6, k,• Y ( 1 Y '1,....wAIL' '-4-- .1---.:41',,:••••ill IvIts,i---:"..3' r-,-,_ .. ici.lc, , ,,.. .. ., 31.igiii " ‘',i g 49,1 ,, � � - - , _ `' 'E ITa 1 •. ,,z, .,tJx. ,^ 1:: n1R, i;yM ,r, -.r y .. � '� �; II II 1�II��\I�_ �ili4 ZI Ci'��\. u R I I'I'll 1 �8 ir: 11 ,� ,,,, ..� ` �;�L j� Q�j '�is �' r__--_,, •"ti rrl_ `'•-0 o� .; ,\q 'rFp g �: .t..: I `. j c A S 8i 1 j' , ' iq` o 111r/ '� w 0 J +,t,is r.• 7 4 II 4, 1 ,1 l i -•k. I =-Eek 6 R �. ,, .. it I!, t4'4 I w fi��NNNNNNNNNNNN�s---'�Yi.J.Lir/.i.ir.t,T—...w.. Y<'4"- _'�N1. �. I't } e •�.. I ,�R .• ^ f \`'tea ,. 1 J J {R _-.R -- irr'ji Nip• ! I --- ,,! I -1 s:.•_'� !'i I,r, i ti,.. .# :__ •I}.. , --•-- ;7- t !.r• --,,04:. 1I -k'�7 ' J 8 I i �, .. .w 1 ..H� y' t`: I i60 - u N ' �. Oi VI i ";4:-'4a- •,� ___.•�.✓'�1__......--1� ',4 t,-5L y ..__ t E if.' . `�,.,r -.- __ a•�.,�1-SY..i• M. �..i' 1 i` 'I �,link, I.fl �it #�•i Il./ 1• .-4 '3 _ •.,t _ _...__ 1 '--a' --h _-- r ' • •0 @ ii 4 _.i A r c.' b cal N, k v-+ , i . ; -.,[ J i._;:.t I I ; ,,I' .i •I J t. • o•; ... ;V al !. -ow --� . --7,—o�r�(,. AGR r `' •�- ./i yr. . �s .,. z-4,...,an ieimusr,,,,.r.,,,,wiervaisirnitliniaill!, e,::,,tes.4ill . ' P"'-`1.11. ' 1 g-SaF,7 Eal..,,,___ FP Ai-1r „,, w ir tT �r; tih �';. c`' T: „T 1, � . ,w , c 't', 1 � II„ ,,,,,4 „ : ' *'.'-‘2-:''' iirr, r .;i§rNit, -1-4.- "4 Ki301-, ,1„. 4111 ...._/-q,i.:::„:-,iT. .„ .., .I!.... F liitlEt-. llii 1l - ,„,, /4 \- .-11,,;L j Ii \?, � a /...."\,,... -- 4A[..24, 1 ' ,'' -- -,, `' •,-2 t . :' '-'' h y ___.::.,;,,,y,..--/ (j; 1------- �'? '1� .. a I I '--Al°' ''' I' 4 t 1''''' j'15,)limel 7 4z...H',:.....7,...--_—_.:, Z,i kI!:( l r 2.... ,. , ____ „ . ' — ------'- -7 ET, -,':--,,'7.,* 11111.11'411-1.1 ip-v_• ,t` ip,is .ti ii: ' t '� Il '_...-t.' :::: iiii To 4. .-, , ,A4/ #fir 1 '4( III--,: - 1 ,44,1.°1 . u , H t r A g i ''''' k ril:, MIT...Ili':.,.'""'" 1.11,...-14(11E- _,!01.11111"l'ulifil :, 1 Ea-_,,__4. %*i' (I) „,r 1 .1 • ....— ! , --. ' ,,( I - '`, ki-,.--- -..,....-. Li- *,44121 .-- --' `”' k, �� is izi. iik , 'I- • 51 0-..,._ , T,i'l: I. ,. ,I.A, i r- ........ - .4 x ill _: ,,. ,I' =,,,,- -----,,,,„. , _ ......._ .,,, e' ', ----,-,i .1_, i.,-,�'„. •1 A I I, ll Trii 56sonv ,,,. A' —1 - --T• • s 508. 1.. 4 /fir.. I • t 1 :ati`*� 0. ��w trAjni. I 'o p r>;� +�; K; 1 Ili:t..7.•;1i • _ .R t , M Iia. �� f1,t$ bI''i Z'' • .' _ 1Y lie F— ' _._ II '�'> P� -. i 7_, �Y 90S� M �t� �!+• ' �� F� �:�-j I t � iii l r B � g I � la x ;,. , �� 1 11 I -, . .L.,,,'; -. ,el : ,- .1 itli 1'''' Tki,-, ,„,-...-. gilt--Pri _,,,,,V __ I _---_ \atif„ _ 1-,: /1 iiii :.:- ' --.' ', loin ii.-- 0 pi - vis,r r a ''';,•:7` s4.7•_IIIIIIIIIIII .>• ._„ ✓_'.,' I . I PIlb 177. • Art= -.. )yr'', .--w— YID- —r-- I ;17' 1 I<w a i' -.S 5'' e '�• $ . c`r' ��r Y � r_t 4 1 , ' II I •a` I ,'"--i , , Nt I -A IE• 2 t I:.,1`.' �•11L- 15;a1.1111111661111Liiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiia. - ---- f• -''- ....,_ 14 , tr., SUM I t tl < .• w f«a.�•' mionrmmmms�a111W\ orir a. am. .ems J1® E ,'t ,*:. 11:.1;:,,,, -,,,, .2-.,%, 11:_,,,."..t t%•• i 4'a I'-',2% 0 IA )1.21kIrliiiiili3- 5 t yYN "L".f.... ,...1'"g- LI .-.19t1, 0 g v+ n N§ oti ago 1 it 0o r �_ o�� ��< iioM d.,la T ,,per, yyy XI ? '7"4> V --, 1 3- , ,, 1 ”tb, Ttl.!1 ,,,,,,i,-; 1 , 1 g _ Z _v 0 Z, • n C r Z NL ry.� ' `v"i A rr- rdT k-'c.g3 Z 2 Z L5 po=t U n " nai >� ig. N � O r `'< , 1 Fir-,i:57,S - -V i ' i/ , 9,E 32 •--: tet= 3 . ;31 Ill m 2 g w' t.;61111i g �);5 :5 §-,c;,ip4 tgAzIk) ,c64 ,,,,,, a 5_- E- E ii 2.,, t, 1- . al _A_sE gE Iii c,., .„ . z . O c _ -A. $ ��1 • ® gAzg. _ Aroi l ii 61--'. Z:. 4 g Q,1-,Pg 1 P ir IlL. $ g A gi e$ �Aqt iig I' $g El Via, . S Design Review ` "° x X § ,T. A *� *� '$ T E i kg i g ,mT-g p DEVELOPMENT PLAN ❑ I NI ' . o Il- oAgency Submittal a ,W g V g ,,, .0 2 g " . : EL CORREDOR I g Y ,II, . P g o f iii P , O IU g HOTEL AND RETAIL ❑ Bidding/Pricing Package I, : i t t 4 t NORTH ORACLE ROAD ��� a— i ORO VALLEY,ARIZONA , I 1 , 0 E . . ... 0 w1-1 . i . 0 i 1 1:'oM:.• -.11:'',7 ,,,. -0 , ). D g m 11 ii// N Ili .'kr. is _ g •D3: .11 ,\\��„1 • ll:/\\p�,'i: ‘,1,40 ..\\..I C D D .r = iii/i•..: . 11=i////.,.•: -6 0 Ih\\OQ., (n .11:( �.r PROPERTY LINE Fes"" 0 ! /i/• -I n 4 r- 12 1 1,.:! z n a k\\\-4)g 4 •-' o g� e' 1 'vii r:,1,;• 2 . ' lo `. tp, gr I I \ rn a =I� M io 2. 210 > 5 I I iiN o 73 w ! p A 13 * ri M.:, -pz / j ,.........] PI 5. c• I 4) tr-1:1 24 ii C71 NkiliblifiP 7',s.pi _ if-574) ct`-'2. AM 1 4) 1 K •s,':. ''CROSS SLOPE N PROPERTY LME N m a• m 5 A I i '1, \\ R 11 A CI ipt, _,,,,- g i / .,..0-/ v) \\ �n rn 1 ip ;Till 1 2 , Dr Cn ' ..............___,4 P, ,‘ ,> , ____% _ca 4 Mir m C xs� la C7 ; ha' 1 I -ill AN \ aatil i / IIP.7 C rTl Mk II 141 2:1 7�i 4 I , Xu N tn�-, 1 8'-0'AT "'nt N Ili VAN SPACE o Z 5'-0' PROPOSED BUILDING m �,9 _ 8'-0'�,(/�.8'-0'l' / 4. f 1 II 4r j Dy � QUO1 -\4;I , tl v e �'y, _. Z.„ ( _.,:_>_. �ceLX , fTl I Tb:314 ' -'d 1� Z - ;u• 1 x;51"1 r n �( 445 oD o (� ,",n h '�°o i 1, A 7,, r m .. g• Z 4 oz ii•T'l c o rTi - ilg i “4' r-P'T'Ai e 1 21 A. 1 + Z T#I� f,':. H �`a g Fn I D 1 1) iltIVP4 • O ` I ?F\..= 4m olif U _ �� \ ?Z (� x U, O 1FII. I'f= �.. i'llillillii f0*1 :::: s 1 \ n \\ 1n rn \ \ r o III=l 111111I Op� N -‘, gu+---- N ill u.tz=a 11 I q r 1 mo\ tc mPdN-1 �D IE � 1 \ 10 N .1 I R J1, X m SL w m 1; 6• -•N D 1�•ilt 11.11. �g� o � .te4!, p '= H i Q -1=• E• - kW' Rs"lD D 'SII t t �,g -0 . . J� r J D J �() .,-roti ,- D (F-, ‘-'''''' > .E_ El 7 > ° ^m' a , r -0,a'o np § r V)c P G7 n FA ;' f f f-,‘ ........._, , :. E, (f.1 .Z1 �2!J V: I! 1 7'ps, v F f+, a, Z pC X 2-1 O� G Irt O o u rn A .,, $� F k'I c4 I. o F - _- II' 3' Irl(nr-0 t-07. --.2>.: TYP. 8' I x. 10 O '• y Al!it c i Z ,,0b, Ms-o' Z ,n E0. EQ. „ TM. Fl 0 i PIS gy n MF0 THi C .. {L y4 O C0� OO�4� �I • ' V m >W:4 N A 1 O,,�O g. c Zig _g c rq P 1 -- D D • p pir 1•16) .' IIc. �� z< tn~ m v ° I p i ! DEVELOPMENT PLAN ❑ Design Review o A EL CORREDOR Agency Submittal Z O I`�• g $ HOTEL AND RETAIL ❑ Bidding/Pricing Package NORTH ORACLE ROAD ORO VALLEY.ARIZONA ' d Member Schoeppach asked how a resident would become involved in the process. Mr. Vella stated the Town would be willing to meet with the HOA. MOTION carried, 4-0. 6. 0V12-05-03B. Oro Valley Sunway LLC, represented by SBBL Architecture and Planning, requests approval of a development plan and landscape plan for the Homewood Suites hotel and retail/restaurant buildings, located within the El Corredor development in proximity to the northeast corner of Oracle Road and Linda Vista. if you have any questions about this matter, please contact David Ronquillo. Senior Planner, at (520) 229-4817 or dronquillo@orovalleyaz.gov. Thomas Sayler Brown, SBBL, non resident, presented the proposal and reviewed the location, development plan, existing elevation and proposed elevations. Erick Barrett, Landscape Architect presented the landscape proposal. David Ronquillo, OV Senior Planner, presented the staff report into the record. Mr. Ronquillo stated staff recommended approval of the development plan with the conditions in Exhibit A, in addition staff recommended approval of the landscape plan with the conditions in Exhibit A. Mr. Ronquillo submitted the revised elevations as Exhibit B. Joe Barr, OV resident, stated he liked the uses and the developer has incorporated the neighbor's concerns in his proposal. MOTION: A motion was made by Member Schoeppach and seconded by Member Anderson to approve OV12-05-03B, Applicant's request for a development plan and landscape plan for the Homewood Suites hotel and retail/restaurant buildings subject to the conditions in Exhibit A and Attachment 2. MOTION carried, 4-0. 7. OVI 3-08-34 Oro Valley Sunway LLC., represented by SBBL Architecture and Planning, requests approval of architectural elevations for the Homewood Suites hotel, located within the El Corredor development in proximity to the northeast corner of Oracle Road and Linda Vista. If you have any questions about this matter, please contact David Ronquillo, Senior Planner, at (520) 229-4817or dronquillo©orovalleyaz.gov. MOTION: A motion was made by Member Shelton and seconded by Member Schoeppach to approve OV13-08-34, Applicant's request for approval of architectural elevations for the Homewood Suites hotel located within the El Corredor Development subject to the conditions in Attachment 1, including Exhibits A and B. MOTION carried, 4-0. %or 8. Public Hearing, 0V3-08-11, Effective Signs, representing Innovation Corporate Center, LLC, requests approval of a PAD Exemption for Innovation Corporate —,--,. Ly-.0./--1,..it.. -1---- 1', 4 I • • District . , , Mountain isa ire . , ". t a i n �1 ‘,00.- 1st, APR I'EiSppi :" g IOU ...... ...”,,,,..„_,... . y 4.,,,,,,,,-.- - -- .FIRE DISTRICT 4` , rgx , ;�,.. e,4 4{4y_,,,,--.00$W;-', .-_ , -rt , , 4 ........._.. - Town of Oro Valley i 11000 North La Canada Drive Oro Valley,Arizona 85737 Honorable; Paul H. Loomis, Mayor Kenneth Carter,Vice-Mayor Al Kunisch,Council Member Paula Abbott,Council Member William Garner, Council Member Barry Gillaspie, Council Member Salette Latas,Council Member i I RE: Mountain Vista Fire District Annexation i A large number of residents within the Oro Valley Town limits have requested the opportunity to become part of the Mountain Vista Fire District and pass petitions soliciting the majority approval of the effected property owners. Per Arizona Revised Stature 48-262.G. "If the annexation includes property located within an incorporated town, 4111.- the town is required to approve by ordinance or resolution such annexation". The Mountain Vista Fire District respectfully requests the Town of Oro Valley, by resolution,endorse this I annexation at its April 1, 2009 council meeting. Please find attached a map and legal description of the proposed Suffolk Hills annexation area. Both the Mountain Vista Fire District and Golder Ranch Fire District board of directors have endorsed this annexation project. In addition to these endorsements the District has the documented support of the professional firefighters and over 300 property owners affected by this project. The District has prepared a brief presentation of this project and will respond to any additional questions at the Towns April 1, 2009 Council meeting. Respectfully submitted, 6 ,:,,,,,p 1,,,J„,.„ Mi hael Treece Board Chairman 3-29-09 %Ili 2292 West Magee Road, Suite 190 Tucson, AZ 85742 Phone: 520-575-4087 Fax: 520-638-5270 Suffolk Hills Proposed Boundary Change Mountain Vista Fire District April 01,2009 Pursuant to Arizona revised Statute 48-262(A)(1)District boundary changes:procedures;notice;hearing; determinations;petitions,the Mountain Vista Fire District has prepared the following information for the proposed Suffolk Hills boundary change project. Proposed area is located in the Town of Oro Valley from Hardy Road south. The legal description of the approximate 3.6 square miles of the proposed area to be included in the Mountain Vista Fire District is: DESCRIPTION AND MAP All those part of Sections 24, 25, 35 and 36, Township 12 South, Range 13 East, G&SRB&M, Pima County, Arizona, more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the Southwest Quarter corner of said Section 24, said point also being the Northwest Quarter corner of said Section 25, said point also being the centerline intersection of Hardy Road and Northern Avenue, as shown on that plat of Rancho Feliz, Lots 353-389, Book 29 of Maps and Plats at Page 24, in the Office of the Pima County Recorder; THENCE southerly to a point of intersection of the west line of said Section 25 and the prolongation of the existing south right-of-way line of said Hardy Road, said point being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE easterly along said prolongation and south right-of-way line of said roadway, said line also being the northerly lines of the following subdivisions: Rancho Feliz, Lots 353-389, Book 29 of Maps and Plats at Page 24, Hardy Place, Block 1, Book 31 of Maps & Plats at Page 95, to a point on the west right-of-way line of the Tucson-Florence Highway (Oracle Road); Continue thence easterly, along the prolongation of said line, to a point on the east right-of-way line of the Tucson-Florence Highway (Oracle Road), said point being on the south right-of-way line of Hardy Road as shown on that plat of Sunnyslope, Lots 1 & 2, Book 17 of Maps and Plats at Page 27, Continue thence easterly, along said line, to a point on the northwest corner of Lot 9 of Sunnyslope, Lots 3-59, Book 18 of Maps and Plats at Page 34; THENCE easterly along the north line of Lots 9 and 12 of said subdivision, to the south line of said Section 24; THENCE easterly along said line, to a point on the west line of Lot 29 of The Amended Plat of Sunnyslope, Lots 26 411 - 31, 35, & 52-54, Book 31 of Maps and Plats at Page 79; THENCE northerly along said line to the north line of said subdivision; THENCE easterly along said line to a point on the east line of said Section 24, said line also being the west boundary of the Coronado National Forest; THENCE southerly, along the east line of said Section 24, to Northeast Quarter corner of Section 25; THENCE southerly, along the east line of said Section 25, said line also being the east lines of the following subdivisions: Sunnyslope, Lots 3-59, Book 18 of Maps and Plats at Page 34, Sunnyslope, Resubdivision of Lots 26-31, 35, & 52-54, Book 31 of Maps and Plats at Page 79, Rancho Catalina, Lots 1-106, Book 23 of Maps and Plats at Page 30, and Rancho Catalina, Lots 107-211, Book 23 of Maps and Plats at Page 68, to the Northeast Corner of said Section 36; Continue thence southerly, along said the east line of said Section 36, said line also being the east right-of-way line of First Avenue, as shown on Suffolk Hills, Lots 108-195 in Book 14 of Maps and Plats at Page 17, to the East Quarter Corner of said Section 36; THENCE westerly along the Quarter Section line of said Section 36, said line also being the south line of the following subdivisions: Suffolk Hills, Lots 1-44 in Book 13 of Maps and Plats at Page 18, Suffolk Hills, Lots 45-107 in Book 13 of Maps and Plats at Page 43, Suffolk Hills, Lots 108-195 in Book 14 of Maps and Plats at Page 17 and Suffolk Hills, Resubdivision in Book 15 of Maps and Plats at Page 10, said line also being the north line of the following subdivisions: Catalina Village Subdivision No. 3 in Book 10 of Maps and Plats at Page 26, Westward Look Guest Ranch No. 1, Lots 1-61 in Book 24 of Maps and Plats at Page 22, and Hallmark Plaza, Blocks 1 & 2, in Book 32 of Maps and Plats at Page 51, to the northwest corner of Block 1 of said Hallmark Plaza, said point being on the easterly right-of-way line of the Tucson-Florence Highway (Oracle Road); Continue thence westerly, along said Quarter Section line of said Section 36, to a point on the west right-of-way line of the Tucson-Florence Highway (Oracle Road), said point also being the northeast corner of Lot 8 of Catalina Village Subdivision No. 2, as shown on Book 9 of Maps and Plats at Page 79; THENCE southerly, along the east line of said Lot 8, to the southeast corner of said lot; THENCE westerly, along the south line of said lot, to the southwest corner of said lot, said point lying on the east • Suffolk Hills Proposed Boundary Change Mountain Vista Fire District April 01,2009 Pursuant to Arizona revised Statute 48-262(A)(1)District boundary changes:procedures;notice;hearing; determinations;petitions,the Mountain Vista Fire District has prepared the following information for the proposed Suffolk Hills boundary change project. Proposed area is located in the Town of Oro Valley from Hardy Road south. The legal description of the approximate 3.6 square miles of the proposed area to be included in the Mountain Vista Fire District is: DESCRIPTION AND MAP All those part of Sections 24, 25, 35 and 36, Township 12 South, Range 13 East, G&SRB&M, Pima County, Arizona, more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the Southwest Quarter corner of said Section 24, said point also being the Northwest Quarter corner of said Section 25, said point also being the centerline intersection of Hardy Road and Northern Avenue, as shown on that plat of Rancho Feliz, Lots 353-389, Book 29 of Maps and Plats at Page 24, in the Office of the Pima County Recorder; THENCE southerly to a point of intersection of the west line of said Section 25 and the prolongation of the existing south right-of-way line of said Hardy Road, said point being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE easterly along said prolongation and south right-of-way line of said roadway, said line also being the northerly lines of the following subdivisions: Rancho Feliz, Lots 353-389, Book 29 of Maps and Plats at Page 24, Hardy Place, Block 1, Book 31 of Maps & Plats at Page 95, to a point on the west right-of-way line of the Tucson-Florence Highway (Oracle Road); Continue thence easterly, along the prolongation of said line, to a point on the east right-of-way line of the Tucson-Florence Highway (Oracle Road), said point being on the south right-of-way line of Hardy Road as shown on that plat of Sunnyslope, Lots 1 & 2, Book 17 of Maps and Plats at Page 27, Continue thence easterly, along said line, to a point on the northwest corner of Lot 9 of Sunnyslope, Lots 3-59, Book 18 of Maps and Plats at Page 34; 41, THENCE easterly along the north line of Lots 9 and 12 of said subdivision, to the south line of said Section 24; THENCE easterly along said line, to a point on the west line of Lot 29 of The Amended Plat of Sunnyslope, Lots 26- 31, 35, & 52-54, Book 31 of Maps and Plats at Page 79; THENCE northerly along said line to the north line of said subdivision; THENCE easterly along said line to a point on the east line of said Section 24, said line also being the west boundary of the Coronado National Forest; THENCE southerly, along the east line of said Section 24, to Northeast Quarter corner of Section 25; THENCE southerly, along the east line of said Section 25, said line also being the east lines of the following subdivisions: Sunnyslope, Lots 3-59, Book 18 of Maps and Plats at Page 34, Sunnyslope, Resubdivision of Lots 26-31, 35, & 52-54, Book 31 of Maps and Plats at Page 79, Rancho Catalina, Lots 1-106, Book 23 of Maps and Plats at Page 30, and Rancho Catalina, Lots 107-211, Book 23 of Maps and Plats at Page 68, to the Northeast Corner of said Section 36; Continue thence southerly, along said the east line of said Section 36, said line also being the east right-of-way line of First Avenue, as shown on Suffolk Hills, Lots 108-195 in Book 14 of Maps and Plats at Page 17, to the East Quarter Corner of said Section 36; THENCE westerly along the Quarter Section line of said Section 36, said line also being the south line of the following subdivisions: Suffolk Hills, Lots 1-44 in Book 13 of Maps and Plats at Page 18, Suffolk Hills, Lots 45-107 in Book 13 of Maps and Plats at Page 43, Suffolk Hills, Lots 108-195 in Book 14 of Maps and Plats at Page 17 and Suffolk Hills, Resubdivision in Book 15 of Maps and Plats at Page 10, said line also being the north line of the following subdivisions: Catalina Village Subdivision No. 3 in Book 10 of Maps and Plats at Page 26, Westward Look Guest Ranch No. 1, Lots 1-61 in Book 24 of Maps and Plats at Page 22, and Hallmark Plaza, Blocks 1 & 2, in Book 32 of Maps and Plats at Page 51, to the northwest corner of Block 1 of said Hallmark Plaza, said point being on the easterly right-of-way line of the Tucson-Florence Highway (Oracle Road); 161, Continue thence westerly, along said Quarter Section line of said Section 36, to a point on the west right-of-way line of the Tucson-Florence Highway (Oracle Road), said point also being the northeast corner of Lot 8 of Catalina Village Subdivision No. 2, as shown on Book 9 of Maps and Plats at Page 79; THENCE southerly, along the east line of said Lot 8, to the southeast corner of said lot; THENCE westerly, along the south line of said lot, to the southwest corner of said lot, said point lying on the east • -r line of Lot 9 of said plat; THENCE southerly, along the said line, to the northwest corner of Lot 7 of said plat, said point also being the southeast corner of parcel as recorded in Book 9221 of Dockets, at Page 67; THENCE westerly, along the south line of said parcel, to the southwest corner of said parcel, said point lying on the west line of said Lot 9; THENCE northerly, along the west line of said lot, to the south right-of-way line of Chapala Drive; THENCE northwesterly to the intersection of the north right-of-way line of Chapala Drive and west right-of-way line of Northern Avenue, as shown on the plat of Harelson Estates, in Book 16 of Maps and Plats at Page 20; THENCE northerly, along said west right-of-way line of said Northern Avenue, said line also being the easterly line of the following subdivisions: Catalina Citrus Estates in Book 6 of Maps and Plats at Page 24, Harelson Estates in Book 16 of Maps and Plats at Page 20; Bonita Estates, Lots 1-17 in Book 24 of Maps and Plats at Page 25; Casas Lindas Addition, Block 1 in Book 39 of Maps and Plats at Page 66; Campos Adobes, Lots 1-20 in Book 60 of Maps and Plats at Page 67; to the northeast corner of Lot 20 of said Campos Adobes; THENCE northeasterly to the Southwest Quarter corner of said Section 25, said point also being the centerline intersection of Magee Road and Northern Avenue; THENCE northerly, along the west line of said Section 25, to the point of intersection said line and the prolongation of the south right-of-way line of said Hardy Road, said point being the TRUE POINT OF MAP , C/i ___--_,,,,c_N__ _-.. __.___.. I j1i ;1 SEC : 4, 7 1 T 121S, / 'J J' h / / ,; \ , _ ofam-- . i110 . .. ___ 1 , ! ------„7„..._,,,,,..........,„ 1 / , /7 --_,., . ,, . i --.-.-2,-D L..., / /,/ i r ,z-t" i-- / i f- �:�_- - - _ _ -, -- =-1---- -HARDY RO L _ 1-- / / �----•�•J I, L .1. /q//// i // i! 1 C'-' `. — /,) : r- - F -1 //a( ---N-,. / ir , C\ ���/a , Rte' __. ///!� 7 '---- -i/-...._-__.:__1_-_-_-_-_,__J L__-__c------7 r----- 7/:-----) 4/....__ Th.....,,-)...,,,,,,_-,--,.., ,..„.,..__.„-_-_, i r----=---- --://_ / /7-- ii ,,,,-,1 (..,.. i_. ., , I 1/ SEC, 26, __ _-o /71 P. ;," -ti.�. -�/ ,,,.....„.2_ "4 R 113_E f ______„--/c , --- --------, - / '''',/ 11, 1,. 1 7, I T \.- q /*-=------------/--- ,....... , ___. ...,_,L______,____, _.--..\\___ = (.., -- 7, - ,_.;:.„..:___,___:,. 1: ._r_z„ I I'1 \ % v� -\\---7/7/1_7_ c;,,------______,„(r-\ , if" _t______,<___________,T)._,..,ir_ .. . Lit 1 -- :::-------i r---- -\.__ ., , `-' i • ' ) -7 - -1 / ii 11 I s? - e7:- --) 1 lj_:) 1 i [—I T 7/ I 1 N ,--,,,-1, ------- ) ,1 1 i. , t.... . , ____,.......„ 3 1 i 0 / / / 11 I ....,,:=1 - i-----05 =='n L._ ; —71 ______J '-'---- --12 ----- -.1 IW r I ,I 1 - fI __,. --_ _._._.__...._f' ci? IN I --� _,_:, -- I i----7 - ----— 1,, AC. .: -'-------------7----- -1-.'- ;' a f c' 1.,_---__--------- TT -S,' 7 SEI, 35, I . i ;^'E -tPAT.=rrniw c a r , —_ i ___� / /i-- ...J / 2 • .i -L.. , . APR 1'09Am 835 IOU LA .,,' ii • ... pi . .„ ....., . , . „ . . .,. . . . , .„...„. , ... • Mountain Vista Fire District , -, 1 respectively requests authorization to * -..„•,,,,, ;, ..,,,,,,.....,,,.. .,, annex in Oro Valley from Hardy South , ,.., • . , . .'' -••-•-:, ----,,••-•,•,, 9 , -'..; • ,,•,,;..,,,:. ,,, - - ' ,... . ,••-..:, • Over 500 property owners already i optirtAIPI insit4 , support this annexation ., . r 1 visTRIcir . .. .,..,6,44.:,... s:.:.. ... • Mountain Vista meets all Oro Valley standards in the annexation area • Oro Valley's General Plan contains at least 3 Fire Districts .,,....• . iii.i mei ;]•,.At _ ......._ •._. .„ ..„ . , ., •., ,. : ,....,.. .s,,_•,,, ; .„. , . . •;--(:)''' : , . ; .. , , . •. .. . , ,'• .‘...T. ; ,' , '•_'' - , .. . , •••,, , ,,,,,. ! i p ,-,-••., , ,‘f••i ,,...,,,,;•!-., - . ., ' -••'-.• ' '•- - , •, • • .• . 1 ... . . , -ORO-VALLEY -.:,--- , •• . ORO VALLEY „ , , , ., . „ ,.,.. . . .... ' - • . ,-•_.. - _ „ . , ' 1...•.. , . , , • , .. ... .. ; 1 .- ' - .--.-.'• '•--,.---.,_'.1-•''''E---; i-'"''''' ',-•,-,-;_,;,..-,....-,-.,-;'-'....1 ,' .,••-.}.,. .._,.._,._:.:..:,'',. ., ,-..,: . . ,_ . ,.. ,., ,. . . . .• • • • • . . , • . .1... , , . •, 1 • . , \., , . n. . . ,., n,,. . . . • I- .:. ,r ',; 7!••I't,..'. . . . ; '. ,r, .'r,l• i' ,...1•,.r ' ,:,..,' , .. . ,a..4., i=t1:• ! 1 ,7 .'.,:'' r,, . .,,.,s,1 ' ' t.' I ' '•• 1 •‘-*.-.;....•,,,,, .. 7-ri- - -,---;:c.i.,.„,:,,,.,1,,..7:'_"; r'!..,:.)..,,:',. r....'..'..... • ,\ •'.r','i.:::'';,' ' ' ''! ,' :'' ..,'..:,'' , i ', ' ., : :. '‘.• , ' ' , , ,'V . , ' , , • , ' ' ' . r.t '.'.' ' ' . CASAS ADOBES ANNEXATION .,' - _ . • .• , , •. , • 4,,,.' l',.''i, ,F.,'''''L. .air,'?":„}El'''-‘ .•' .41'7 .,14---) ; \-. '.1.; ' •1'l'..-''lir!, ' / _,41/41/4.rsi..rr--.-.-$,,,.......„......„. _ _,,.. •\' i; ,,• ; ,-1 •''' i LA CANADA , 1.,...,•;.•,' -,. ,'•-•• ' ' ':,'• ''.'i.,• -'' ', / ; , 1—,,............ - s , JC:44,47.., .. • .\.1 , ', / ,: . • 1-,........,.:.J, '- '''' ',/: •,,, , , . , \. , jil :-, ,.-'i., , ,, ,, . ,• ••,' „ V. • •'.:I;,' . i ./ - •'.' ' • ' 7**,14. ' ' _____1_3, 1 . d -, r-i::::,..._ • ' 0146V:ALLEY ORO VALLEY ' 1 t- F t._ r r _ - I (. -7 t • .i - - • ..l•#,., ,_ *1-'-'.4- 1 + ' , .; -- Ir` may, p - -- ...j_,e.G .Jy F A + • ,.:4/7f, , ' . , dr A r r 'r" VP'. ', i LA CANADA • ; I t LA CANADA , I' i'. tt t 2ANUANY 26".'8 `$,•L r' ;:, JANtfARY 2061 ;,_,,,;;;. \; / `,- ....., . ,.1: . I. , ' .; ., '' ''''''.7'."4,"' -', ,..„../..,...:`, :, `i ,;;i....,„, Ate..; • ,t 1 r f!rt I. r t ORO VALLEY • x 01C VALLEY s a i s♦MC Al ri*MK ti,VA vi6Y +' • Vii. r • I.!r 'r J r '....' . ,..',',.' ',_'.',,..,..:s . si.'.'. ; '- '''.-''',.it ' 'Ct •,..J., '•'T` -d G�(I Hit.-i • r, ' LA CANADA {�:ILI:. ';+ ' c +']J f } ! , -...,4 , t i. ' \.r.4._•i, TI jit • 2 i 1 1 x -.<)- , , , ,, 4.4.<›... • i '•.. .•. R • i ; I+-•: i �i - , , i , 7 , 1 / ' ' CoA ....'•. •OR-.G VALLEY i---;__,i.- !" .ORG,' AL' t I r t , - 1 ' p I:3.,; I , r ' '• it 7 ...f 1 rY�, 1 .i �1 'il -r i' ,- ' 7,,,,,,,,,,,,, i r1 ' � ''.,, 1 - I 1 - it fr - f_ _ • -" r '1 I"hx. . SY-. > r.. 1 1.,:::',47, y' �, 1 f4..,1. \\ s, �% r'1 ' ,,. '',, i.,.'',;::'1,- , , .. : ., ','', , ''''r.. .r 4 • r. -Q` , -,--7 , 1 ' r i ORO VALLEY • tirt t ,, I / . r h ' I ( 4 - i. r' ,., ._ ( W`'�, I 'r 11 ufPoLK r+g.{.5 + S' , ' 1•( -ow, ANNEXA DON 1:t I -'^^•.+. '- .. 3 • • rs R{ VALLEY 1 OH.C3 VALLEY Ifxp,' -x•r , - 11 ( i • " r t ,tifV Ili t---,,,;' r ' '4 • J// 1 1 +of t1 __-�'` 7 ___ / itill „...,....7. ___ , , ,,,.....,,,- mr----- 1 Iyj.. �FULL_ I �wourrtrsu I I ri J /I t, sc f I , r � _ , ��.�� . , 1 I ,...!-<-7'''',...7 .• I 1'' i 19tiNTAMN VESfA Anti',1 1SPNIC'i I ,fl -/ LL� - --_ - 4 1 • j t,,,_" rsat OriVir.=,...... ill r.eirdma I ......110.40 Ow '\117 . . ' .. ! t ,' ..r _ 1 t��.c VALE IIIA Ii1• \#:_rj , rr11l� .� I I ..f ! IV 3:i 3E... •. i .: ,. ` . !P_: �- "91tAlt AIN VIS to 1:44:1‘E IS14tr'l .00410° • p I t„ is i. i r I db l T,01111.. ii.Owns soh. !' 1 r- ', ,' . r' .014rw./,Obi Ow. hr...w-woo w-e • . 1 %: err...+... ,,,,,,,.4 :.)i'''''''''' _A",,,:". • * 7- \ 2'..:,:.;.•.' i 0 ,4. ..... I.i ' ,_ _La e A% A.• ;III ,; , ,....,:i= - ,, ,-....7," = -. 4* , ..:1 ''' A.01,01 , . ' %., ,'-''' . ir .11111111111,. F.4,7---,--.-,'' .,..}-.:.,___.'. , . . - ,,. , ,.„ . -... . .. ... , !-'77-7-1 7:"..-. • : ..14.- " ' - . • err 11111*** , I ,t-_ s L rt r riii1 . 4 k . • g 5 pi:jimiuciiiiiiii...... ....., , .... --- ' ; , ,,,,,,,.0„4"r: :,,,,, 14, ,. " i . de, . 1."' C , if s.0 MENtif.M.:',. a&.*,, c-3, , . I , • ?"""*"..';',?,,,,,,,P• , , r...., ;„:‘,„.,....„„,,';',1,.i , .. _ f . '',,,.-,,,,"--.''',•,'"':, .,.. •- A,A , I ,A A A A . 1,,,,,1.f..Lietr ... '.'"L' 1 , ' ,r rr,';::,: '',' . 1 R4IMPIENC . 49•° ' . 1 ri .,W,,,',',",q,''..','. e I*•ir475V,I,A;`',!''''. • i , IIII ---'•;"1''''''101111140 . , MOW VIST444, , , .i • '' 4 6 ,. 64330 1 1. 4111, -,----. , ....., . . ,.., ,,,.. .,..,..„ ... . 1, .. " , . . „,, - MONTHLY RESPONSE REPORTING . . • , ,101N1AIN VIVI A FIN 1)1,11.,1(1 • . ,... 1 r . . ,..2/;PP CP.O. •l S,..71'1 Ati PP Plil. A P11,411/....4....1,4ii/:1 ,•„ OROVALLEY .• ;,.ri JP./.../ /,7/111,7:441414/ PIC, t.:• • ,,,III errs ',Mill Vill, p r//as .2240 V*IRO. I. , '" ,- . .:i JO r/1//.. •AMU V C Pc:: /1:74..,.../...,141,•t•,/,11, ',If': MOO 'V/i CP ,41‘.1/173.C7 0,....1/ PKPIVIR,...0.1,r•nr.-•• .1011/ 7,WC ....Ai,. V It/Z mr-vory mixr.r4o,c mow ,,,,,, , 'I 5:Cff :•013 ,/,...L.A.= CC At /44 1-4/X.1/Cet U/S.0 ..- , _/ ,• .,, INtIlr/./.9.4.•-•t*CP01/P•4 C... . .' ' 4014 s,' ' ,7/OW 0,1, ...UM= P il,CP 1X.Part•IIAZIInP40,4131.1, /4,3 , , /:a., ...I,/ IT...I:.,1..C.....,,44,/t1,1 CZ. t211,110•C ACCU,,,,, C.C. , • i '''',-'7.7--''':',,, :4.710 344 C.CC 1+, 17114s.00,11•20•LI., J.,../. ;4,111 PM/I .1AM,,Ill :...^.”.4 Pla.11014,..1011,3C4R WNW COE, 77 N. ••7', v.,OM,,cral MP 4,...1.14.411/VII/t•w://,I f f.,', r ;:.-/:: 'P.::','f', •MI—,;,',77,:f.:— 121,0,,,c,scrf P.,. ,..'1‘49UNT AIN%/ES IA FINE DIS r RIC 1 :I rf• al 3./:. Il./..461,1, ,,,./ PHPI WWI,.061.1.,,,,,, 0 s ...' 7 flem. 17.. •cAlC•102I.FL A., f CI r M.1•11,..C.,PI AK 1VMM e r, lir 1 If NI. C.'I.., -c...:vrtnir!..,7.• 707,0f ^11/0 4,C.If II P.....1,f..,1•ITC,•,I•4 MC., C-P, ,, 7,7. .ON •IIJ•11,1.7•II.I.,tt‘7,.r, t 0//fr, ro....vvoreamnp. I M, I 7 4 170M 7 GM, 1.101.7.401..r4X1C71,1.01M:41!CI NV, t71,1.0,4..1:4,40., 1.1., i . 7•:01/ f:.c... .,•ror,rt.ttaisorrle-D e0,,:f /1/.........4. 7,.///‘1•1•f OW f.ff/kfir ;',V,:. -^- - .4,1,1 AO P'. ,ca:•• ... ,,... •1,91....601..,lw ,'0,1 7i POW N4•1;11/1.**C••••M ,... r 5.1 1/ ....,,,,,W 3 ra..• "...It,,,,..V.r.r.C.111,4, :.,N. ,./•14, *1141,/r/f14I7/17 f friP itypf••••;11=-41.717'nel r't*.',•1 II. fir. '..."-- 6 1, • • ,I • ,, M 0‘14711LTRESP•NSE REPORTING ,,, MONTHLY RESPONSE REPORTING KW. JUL AUG RP, CX1 WY,/ EIC JAR ,E0 MAR APR kW ,14 ANNO.I.CA/1$ , •.. Ms 214 2fd 271 240 21f, 211 297 167 1629 - • 1.-, . . , - , ,.,'....•' :-,.•7 I i ,; , . , ORO VALLEY .,-t.-,4;-4 - 2ORN 15 101 VA', 15 1377 15 137 III 113 1!+? its. le!. (2111 , . • - ., , . ., ' ':'''''-',..-,4 —, ' ' ' ' ' . ,'...',...,, - •. 0,4119,E.rt sr. ,. ' • ' ,:'.,'!:,' -,'.ii 11,1 . ,,t ' ,c,,..,...,..,,.... --.4„4.d.1.1,4—t 5,,',,,,,,,,.,.,.,,-..,: "ili, fil,l, ',Mr,t t t,,,,,... i ,..,t,• ,1,, ., , i , MVFD ANNUAL RESPONSES ,'\'-.„-,}'\,'',,,.'•'._'.,,;•r,::,,4,:1.-,.1''1;'''-.1',.41'.,—t'.'..,.'•:,.!''.,-'.'4''„.,.1:I.,,1 9-4,' 1,4 4,.IA•.N'',,',,V..-,,-1 3-:I-,:-1--,,-,0,-,-—i-:--•i-n''''-'.t,'i.„.,-,i.:••-..;—"'..".-,'"--.-,'T.,L..!,'..:„„-L.-,...•,. —.'_-.''_,_•L....;,.',.,. ' '..'•.,,,.1,',,,,4.,, ., o .11---„-,-.•-—..2.—....-.- —7 •8 . 4 V.-22Z ,11 4.--220000 87--0098_ • ' - ,1_, • i l:;:,,,,,,,..,„, ORO VALLEY .„...,..:,.....,..,,.., ‘ ; 'it. '- . ,, . 4. 0 ', ., '.... 1 , .. , ,,-•. ., ,,. -' , •.•::;-. iff * , , _ ._ . .„,. ....,. . • , ,,---2,.. ' - 1. .• . . • . .,,- [...................._ .. . ... ._ .. .. .., ,.....,..• „ . •_ , .• , ...„.,. ...., _ 1 ...• • ,.. 2_-_.,,,_..,,,,:,-„,,,..:,„-:i_;,pk.4..,,.,,•,,, , ,,:‘, ,„--.,,..,, , 1 , ---_,__________......„:. ,., ,, ..•• , ., .,. . \ -1,-..,„., ,. ,. ,,;• 1 "' '''.,''' 4'.. ;71''',:'''.• ' ' , .! , , ''i , ,,. , .....,.. , . . , L........_ ... , ... . ,.,,••=,...,.....,...,, 7 , % !� 1 z1 .,,- Town of Ora Valley Performance Standards I ;, t ORO VALLEY ,�'� � Resolution 0732 March 07,2007 1i 1 -, Fire Service Provider Performance Criteria Oro Valley Standard Compliance i 't I First unit on scene within 6 minutes 90%of the time for all Standard monitored, \\,..,,, ' • r s fir,emergencies reported and met i' 'ii!.:',,'. Two units on scene within 8 minutes 90%of the time for all Standard monitored, . 2 ,� ii, < structure fit, reported and met �"• ,CJI Certified engines and water tenders sufficient enough to Standard monitored, , 3 maintain 250 gallons per minute water fora minimum of repented and met • i �_ �,. � . � two hours 4 First unit on scene within i minutes 90%of the time for all ,standard monitored, i, m+•,li.al,:,,,,-;;,:u it, reported and met • AIS transport capable unit on scene within 8 minutes 90% Standardtnenikered, x ; ,; ; i ill a of the time for all medical emergencies reported and met • Town of Oro Valley Performance Standards Town of Oro Valley Performance Standards Resolution 07-32 March 07,2007 Resolution 07-32 March 07,2007 Requisite Duty and Responsibility Standards for Oro valley Fire Requisite Duty and Responsibility Standards for Oro valley Fire Service Providers Service Providers Oro Valley Standard Compliance Oro Valley Standard Compliance 1 Four(4)person Engine and ladder Companies Standard met One tender fit'our K Two water tenders assigned to Oro Valley station 2 One Supervisor.One Paramedic and One Driver Engineer per Standard met Engine and ladder Company State Fire Marshal,NEPA or ICC certified Fire Inspectors One Paramedic and One Emergency Medical Technician per 9 shall perform annual inspections on all commercial Standard met 3 Standard met occupancies Ambulance One ALS Engine or Ladder Company for every station in Oro 111 Engines,ladders and tenders will be maintained to ISO standard met 4Standard met standards Valley S Two ALS ambulances assigned to Oro Valley Standard met II 1-lazMat responses will he in compliance wait local,state and Standard met federal regulations Four National Wildland Coordination group certified Standard n►rt at the mut Mandatory non-emergency services,public education and tire Standard met 6 firefighters assigned to two or more fire stations in Oro station in Uro Valle, 12 prevention services Valley One hrwsh truck at theI j Documentation confirming compliance with performance Standard met minimum of two type six brush trucks assigned to one or 7 one station in the standards within two days of request more tire stations in Oro Valley Valley 8 ,. ',, t� F; �p/�%t�/J J 'r �' - E - r - j a l .,,..,i. / . ,, . , ,-,., . ...._. I, / ;,. �.. 1 'p p `,," I' '• �`r r T,i! ' • I , tai. , - r C ORO VALLEY r .' . ORO VALLEYI f 'I ..t si • r .. 4. • . .. /0/ -:-'- ;., . . : i r r ;;• mo -11t yts i 1M f liit`a l"Fi#i Y , sr q , '4,''-'''''''.. '''''' '''''' -------1 , ' 1 /_ ,: -, _ , I 9 4-1 r/. , , ,r , TTLVAEY - :. ' .;: 4'11 :; . ''I' , , --,,,,, ,......,..., I ' ' '-L ' '''''''''' ' ' . „,.,..„,,,, !I ;. ... : , ,. ..,.,. , __T;;;:q.',, ..41 -.''',. _ : ,i • : „, \\,!., fl' --, --- . _ ,, ..' , ,,.,.. !::.., :,...'.:,",441.e*:' ''''''-. '''' '. ° : I ' ir4/ ..,''.'''''''''' , ., * ' , ., —, , • F"ft,:,, ; ,..,'', .., _ 1 ,..... ..---t '. •',', , i , 'L. - ,-, ' 4 1. ' , .....1 . . . A , ii i,' ., : ,.• , . .. :1-• I. l 1 ' , ,' ,,,,, ''' , . . ''''''l ---7-1.....92,.,, . , . . . (.-1'r'''..i-r-7 :,,',1; •-•- ,. ' ' I '1 GOLDER RANCH FIRE DISTRICT to, oi.,:ri',drivt: .,...,4 ,C4.en I Mountain Vista Fire District respectively requests authorization to . Zrar., ,-,,,„,-.2,10:,:•rAx 0,20,$12t,0•13 CI,f..f.lari rfil, annex in Oro Valley from Hardy South March 10 200S Mayor and Council Members. • Over 500 property owners already In the interest of public safety and after lengthy discussion.both the Golder Ranch and support this annexation the Mountain Vista Fire District's Board of Directors respectively.unanimous,/approved the Golder Ranch Fire District annexation project from Hardy Road north and the Mountain Vista Fire District annexation project from Hardy Road south,ithin the Tovm • Mountain Vista meets all Oro Valley of Oro Valley.If Mountain Vista Foe District is allo,ed to annex into the Toon from the southern border up to the southern right of'.ay of Hardy Road,Golder Ranch Fire standards in the annexation area '' District will not oppose it • Oro Valley's General Plan contains at Sincerely. least 3 Fire Districts John Fink.Fire Chief Goider Ranch Fire District 10 ' t y 3 �;� .l.✓. {{ '.r +�ffKY'#ht���:f."7 N {,'i s 1_._r 45v; a t +�4'� 9'�`�`° w^}�i r T.,4- �}a,�`E h 7y 4, f x y z s {x c! F K>� n i..,r U.N xY,yip�r,,���-Di"ri`u \r s,r 1RM�?� F}.�'� 4 ,.:41f$vb L V ?� CyJ fix''"N h�'t1MC cT��t-� 'Tr it '« _ "In the interest of public safety and after lengthy discussion,both the Golder Ranch and the Mountain -- Vista Fire District's Board of Directors respectively, unanimously approved the Golder Ranch Fire District `4• PlintfEr _ annexation project from Hardy Road north and the Prin ,.Mountain Vista District annexation project from Hardy *rte � a r s Road south within the Town of Oro Valley. If Mountain • Vista Fire District is allowed to annex into the Town from (10: the southern border up to Hardy Road,Golder Ranch Fire District will not oppose it." + `' cy -John Fink } Fire Chief Golder Ranch Fire Department * 4. e. 4 Mountain Vista Fire District ISO RATING respectively requests authorization to annex in Oro Valley from Hardy South as of February 2007 • La Canada Fire District • Over 500 property owners already —Class 3 support this annexation • Heritage Hills Fire District —Class 4 • Mountain Vista meets all Oro Valley • North Ranch/Linda Vista standards in the annexation area --Class 3/8B • Oro Valley's General Plan contains at least 3 Fire Districts Mountain Vista Fire District is working with ISO on a new consolidated rating, 11 , `4Cji;)' ! . Town of Oro Valley Performance Standards Resolution 07-32 March 07,2007 , Fire Service Provider Performance Criteria r '.£ ! ---- ORO VALLEY 1 90%of (tI I the time first responders to fire emergencies in the Town of Oro Valley arrive I 1t ; - on scene within six minutes from receipt of the �;?�� I; � f --- f ' T +. call by the responding units,within a single �.--- .�.., ,, reporting month. ,. 'W' 1 -, f, ,�w pn We monitor,report and meet this standard. At 4 \" 1 , ---------''' :„__ '- / Town of Oro Valley Performance Standards Town of Oro Valley Performance Standards Resolution 07-32 March 07,2007 Resolution 07-32 March 07,2007 Fire Service Provider Performance Criteria Fire Service Provider Performance Criteria 2. 90%of the time, in the Town of Oro Valley,two 3. Annually the Town of Oro Valley shall verify fire fighting units shall arrive on scene to a that all fire provider(s)who service the town structural fire within eight minutes from receipt shall supply certified engines and water of call,within a single reporting month. tenders sufficient enough to maintain 250 gallons per minute water supply for a minimum We monitor,report and meet this standard. of two hours. We have not been asked to monitor and report this standard,but can and will upon request. 12 Town of Oro Valley Performance Standards Town of Oro Valley Performance Standards Resolution 07-32 March 07,2007 Resolution 07-32 March 07,2007 Fire Service Provider Performance Criteria Requisite Duty and Responsibility Standards for Oro valley Fire Service Providers 4. 90%of the time, in the Town of Oro Valley, 11. Hazardous Material responses shall be units dispatched to medical emergencies shall provided in compliance with local,state,and arrive on scene with five minutes from receipt federal regulations. of the call by the responding units,within a single reporting We meet this standard. We monitor,report and meet this standard. Town of Oro Valley Performance Standards <)," Resolution 07-32 March 07,2007 Requisite Duty and Responsibility Standards for Oro valley Fire • Service Providers x OFt0 VALLEY 13. Reasonable documentation that confirms compliance with these '-' r 1; ', t performance standards shall be provided with two working days of request,to include but not limited to: !' , , • Equipment inventory . r • Hose and pump test records _f • Hydrant test and maintenance =�" • Commercial fire inspections _: ; , l_- - ' • Ladder certification tests ,r • Duty rosters 1� 9: + ; ,. • Personnel status and certifications ",r,-`� , • Mutual aid agreements • Training and dispatch records \,1[:•,:L• • f .J L. We meet this standard. 13 !. I, , GOtDF• 1( j �`,��,� , GOLDER RANCH FIRE DISTRICT ar.../r�. .� Fire *Rescue •Medical 3885 E. Golder Ranch Drive A. � Tucson Arizona 85739 44NG11‘' (520)825-9001 /FAX (520)825-8043 Chief John Fink March 10, 2009 Mayor and Council Members, In the interest of public safety and after lengthy discussion, both the Golder Ranch and the Mountain Vista Fire District's Board of Directors respectively, unanimously approved the Golder Ranch Fire District annexation project from Hardy Road north and the Mountain Vista Fire District annexation project from Hardy Road south within the Town of Oro Valley. If Mountain Vista Fire District is allowed to annex into the Town from the southern border up to the southern right of way of Hardy Road, Golder Ranch Fire District will not oppose it. Sincerely, [2:) pi. ,,„ C John Fink, Fire Chief Golder Ranch Fire District TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 2 Page 1 of 1 IUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: 04/01/09 � TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: TOBIN ROSEN,TOWN ATTORNEY SUBJECT: ORDINANCE NO. (0) 09- 04 , AUTHORIZING THE MOUNTAIN VISTA FIRE DISTRICT TO ANNEX AREAS WITHIN THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY LOCATED SOUTH OF HARDY ROAD. SUMMARY: The Mayor and Council have previously authorized the'Golder Ranch Fire District to annex areas within the Town limits of Oro Valley through Ordinance No. (0) 95-84, dated November 1, 1995. Recently, the Board of the Golder Ranch Fire District voted not to object to annexation of areas within the Town located south of Hardy Road, but rather to allow the Mountain Vista Fire District to annex these areas. Attached for Council consideration is an Ordinance that would authorize the Mountain Vista Fire District to annex areas within the Town located south of Hardy Road. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance No. (0) 09- 04 tor SUGGESTED MOTIONS: I move to approve/deny Ordinance No. (0) 09- 04 , authorizing the Mountain Vista Fire District to annex areas within the Town of Oro Valley located South of Hardy Road. if* '01-' OP I ido "lb A 41)/robin Wen, Town Attorney a/fit(a‘ift.\4,(AA-- David Andrews, Town Manager ORDINANCE NO. (0) 09- 04 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, RELATING TO FIRE DISTRICTS, PERMITTING MOUNTAIN VISTA FIRE DISTRICT TO ANNEX AREAS WITHIN THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY LOCATED SOUTH OF HARDY ROAD WHEREAS, the Town of Oro Valley is a political subdivision of the State of Arizona vested with all associated rights, privileges and benefits and is entitled to the immunities and exemptions granted municipalities and political subdivisions under the Constitution and laws of the State of Arizona and the United States; and WHEREAS, A.R.S. § 48-262 requires a fire district to obtain an endorsement by a city or town when the property to be annexed into the fire district lies within an incorporated city or town; and WHEREAS, on November 1, 1995, the Town Council adopted Ordinance No. (0) 95- 84, authorizing the Golder Ranch Fire District to annex areas within the Town limits of Oro Valley; and WHEREAS, the Board of the Golder Ranch Fire District voted not to object to annexation of areas within the Town limits located south of Hardy Road; and rr WHEREAS, the Board of Golder Ranch Fire District desires to allow the Mountain Vista Fire District to annex those areas located south of Hardy Road; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council have determined that to allow Mountain Vista Fire District to annex areas south of Hardy Road is just and appropriate and is in the best interest of the Town. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, that: SECTION 1: Permission is hereby given to Mountain Vista Fire District to extend its fire district boundaries by annexing property located within the corporate limits of the Town located south of Hardy Road. SECTION 2. The Mayor and other administrative officials of the Town of Oro Valley are authorized and directed to perform all acts necessary or desirable to give effect to this Ordinance. SECTION 3. All Oro Valley Ordinances, Resolutions, or Motions and parts of Ordinances, Resolutions, or Motions of the Council in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. F:\Fire Districts\Mountain Vista\Ordinance.doc Town of Oro Valley Attorneys Office/ca/031009 I SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, ' ' ,1410p such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED by Mayor and Town Council, the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, this 1st day of April , 2009. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Paul H. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Kathryn E. Cuvelier, Town Clerk Tobin Rosen, Town Attorney Date: Date: ,40110 ,iss) F:\Fire Districts\Mountain Vista\Ordinance.don Town of Oro Valley Attorneys Office/ca/031009 S'''''''-''. (91(01,14/L,'.1...-- ;f. \, .141* • • • • • w( Mountain Vista Fire Distric /. - , _nta�n V, ..„„„,„,,,,„„„„„,„ s ,,.., , 4.=. -11.r,,,1,-''' ...,,-,4,411/4„,,: APR l'OSPN 1:18 IOU .,,, FIRE DISTRICT ,4 Town of Oro Valley 11000 North La Canada Drive Oro Valley,Arizona 85737 Honorable; Paul H. Loomis, Mayor Kenneth Carter,Vice-Mayor Al Kunisch, Council Member Paula Abbott,Council Member William Garner,Council Member Barry Gillaspie, Council Member Salette Latas,Council Member I RE: Mountain Vista Fire District Annexation I A large number of residents within the Oro Valley Town limits have requested the opportunity to become part of the Mountain Vista Fire District and pass petitions soliciting the majority approval of the effected property owners. i Per Arizona Revised Stature 48-262 .G. "If the annexation includes property located within an incorporated town, VIS the town is required to approve by ordinance or resolution such annexation". The Mountain Vista Fire District respectfully requests the Town of Oro Valley, by resolution, endorse this annexation at its April 1, 2009 council meeting. Please find attached a map and legal description of the proposed Suffolk Hills annexation area. Both the Mountain Vista Fire District and Golder Ranch Fire District board of directors have endorsed this annexation project. In addition to these endorsements the District has the documented support of the professional firefighters and over 300 property owners affected by this project. The District has prepared a brief presentation of this project and will respond to any additional questions at the Towns April 1, 2009 Council meeting. Respectfully submitted, A ii ' ,,,,p- 1,,,Q_,., Midhael Treece Board Chairman 3-29-09 411, 2292 West Magee Road, Suite 190 Tucson, AZ 85742 Phone: 520-575-4087 Fax: 520-638-5270 Suffolk Hills Proposed Boundary Change Mountain Vista Fire District April 01,2009 Pursuant to Arizona revised Statute 48-262(A)(1)District boundary changes: procedures;notice;hearing; determinations; petitions,the Mountain Vista Fire District has prepared the following information for the proposed Suffolk Hills boundary change project. Proposed area is located in the Town of Oro Valley from Hardy Road south. The legal description of the approximate 3.6 square miles of the proposed area to be included in the Mountain Vista Fire District is: DESCRIPTION AND MAP All those part of Sections 24, 25, 35 and 36, Township 12 South, Range 13 East, G&SRB&M, Pima County, Arizona, more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the Southwest Quarter corner of said Section 24, said point also being the Northwest Quarter corner of said Section 25, said point also being the centerline intersection of Hardy Road and Northern Avenue, as shown on that plat of Rancho Feliz, Lots 353-389, Book 29 of Maps and Plats at Page 24, in the Office of the Pima County Recorder; THENCE southerly to a point of intersection of the west line of said Section 25 and the prolongation of the existing south right-of-way line of said Hardy Road, said point being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE easterly along said prolongation and south right-of-way line of said roadway, said line also being the northerly lines of the following subdivisions: Rancho Feliz, Lots 353-389, Book 29 of Maps and Plats at Page 24, Hardy Place, Block 1, Book 31 of Maps & Plats at Page 95, to a point on the west right-of-way line of the Tucson-Florence Highway (Oracle Road); Continue thence easterly, along the prolongation of said line, to a point on the east right-of-way line of the Tucson-Florence Highway (Oracle Road), said point being on the south right-of-way line of Hardy Road as shown on that plat of Sunnyslope, Lots 1 & 2, Book 17 of Maps and Plats at Page 27, Continue thence easterly, along said line, to a point on the northwest corner of Lot 9 of Sunnyslope, Lots 3-59, Book 18 of Maps and Plats at Page 34; THENCE easterly along the north line of Lots 9 and 12 of said subdivision, to the south line of said Section 24; THENCE easterly along said line, to a point on the west line of Lot 29 of The Amended Plat of Sunnyslope, Lots 26- 31, 35, & 52-54, Book 31 of Maps and Plats at Page 79; THENCE northerly along said line to the north line of said subdivision; THENCE easterly along said line to a point on the east line of said Section 24, said line also being the west boundary of the Coronado National Forest; THENCE southerly, along the east line of said Section 24, to Northeast Quarter corner of Section 25; THENCE southerly, along the east line of said Section 25, said line also being the east lines of the following subdivisions: Sunnyslope, Lots 3-59, Book 18 of Maps and Plats at Page 34, Sunnyslope, Resubdivision of Lots 26-31, 35, & 52-54, Book 31 of Maps and Plats at Page 79, Rancho Catalina, Lots 1-106, Book 23 of Maps and Plats at Page 30, and Rancho Catalina, Lots 107-211, Book 23 of Maps and Plats at Page 68, to the Northeast Corner of said Section 36; Continue thence southerly, along said the east line of said Section 36, said line also being the east right-of-way line of First Avenue, as shown on Suffolk Hills, Lots 108-195 in Book 14 of Maps and Plats at Page 17, to the East Quarter Corner of said Section 36; THENCE westerly along the Quarter Section line of said Section 36, said line also being the south line of the following subdivisions: Suffolk Hills, Lots 1-44 in Book 13 of Maps and Plats at Page 18, Suffolk Hills, Lots 45-107 in Book 13 of Maps and Plats at Page 43, Suffolk Hills, Lots 108-195 in Book 14 of Maps and Plats at Page 17 and Suffolk Hills, Resubdivision in Book 15 of Maps and Plats at Page 10, said line also being the north line of the following subdivisions: Catalina Village Subdivision No. 3 in Book 10 of Maps and Plats at Page 26, Westward Look Guest Ranch No. 1, Lots 1-61 in Book 24 of Maps and Plats at Page 22, and Hallmark Plaza, Blocks 1 & 2, in Book 32 of Maps and Plats at Page 51, to the northwest corner of Block 1 of said Hallmark Plaza, said point being on the easterly right-of-way line of the Tucson-Florence Highway (Oracle Road); Continue thence westerly, along said Quarter Section line of said Section 36, to a point on the west right-of-way line of the Tucson-Florence Highway (Oracle Road), said point also being the northeast corner of Lot 8 of Catalina Village Subdivision No. 2, as shown on Book 9 of Maps and Plats at Page 79; THENCE southerly, along the east line of said Lot 8, to the southeast corner of said lot; THENCE westerly, along the south line of said lot, to the southwest corner of said lot, said point lying on the east 4%. Suffolk Hills Proposed Boundary Change Mountain Vista Fire District April 01,2009 Pursuant to Arizona revised Statute 48-262(A)(1)District boundary changes:procedures;notice;hearing; determinations;petitions,the Mountain Vista Fire District has prepared the following information for the proposed Suffolk Hills boundary change project. Proposed area is located in the Town of Oro Valley from Hardy Road south. The legal description of the approximate 3.6 square miles of the proposed area to be included in the Mountain Vista Fire District is: DESCRIPTION AND MAP All those part of Sections 24, 25, 35 and 36, Township 12 South, Range 13 East, G&SRB&M, Pima County, Arizona, more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the Southwest Quarter corner of said Section 24, said point also being the Northwest Quarter corner of said Section 25, said point also being the centerline intersection of Hardy Road and Northern Avenue, as shown on that plat of Rancho Feliz, Lots 353-389, Book 29 of Maps and Plats at Page 24, in the Office of the Pima County Recorder; THENCE southerly to a point of intersection of the west line of said Section 25 and the prolongation of the existing south right-of-way line of said Hardy Road, said point being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE easterly along said prolongation and south right-of-way line of said roadway, said line also being the northerly lines of the following subdivisions: Rancho Feliz, Lots 353-389, Book 29 of Maps and Plats at Page 24, Hardy Place, Block 1, Book 31 of Maps & Plats at Page 95, to a point on the west right-of-way line of the Tucson-Florence Highway (Oracle Road); Continue thence easterly, along the prolongation of said line, to a point on the east right-of-way line of the Tucson-Florence Highway (Oracle Road), said point being on the south right-of-way line of Hardy Road as shown on that plat of Sunnyslope, Lots 1 & 2, Book 17 of Maps and Plats at Page 27, Continue thence easterly, along said line, to a point on the northwest corner of Lot 9 of Sunnyslope, Lots 3-59, Book 18 of Maps and Plats at Page 34; THENCE easterly along the north line of Lots 9 and 12 of said subdivision, to the south line of said Section 24; THENCE easterly along said line, to a point on the west line of Lot 29 of The Amended Plat of Sunnyslope, Lots 26- 31, 35, & 52-54, Book 31 of Maps and Plats at Page 79; THENCE northerly along said line to the north line of said subdivision; THENCE easterly along said line to a point on the east line of said Section 24, said line also being the west boundary of the Coronado National Forest; THENCE southerly, along the east line of said Section 24, to Northeast Quarter corner of Section 25; THENCE southerly, along the east line of said Section 25, said line also being the east lines of the following subdivisions: Sunnyslope, Lots 3-59, Book 18 of Maps and Plats at Page 34, Sunnyslope, Resubdivision of Lots 26-31, 35, & 52-54, Book 31 of Maps and Plats at Page 79, Rancho Catalina, Lots 1-106, Book 23 of Maps and Plats at Page 30, and Rancho Catalina, Lots 107-211, Book 23 of Maps and Plats at Page 68, to the Northeast Corner of said Section 36; Continue thence southerly, along said the east line of said Section 36, said line also being the east right-of-way line of First Avenue, as shown on Suffolk Hills, Lots 108-195 in Book 14 of Maps and Plats at Page 17, to the East Quarter Corner of said Section 36; THENCE westerly along the Quarter Section line of said Section 36, said line also being the south line of the following subdivisions: Suffolk Hills, Lots 1-44 in Book 13 of Maps and Plats at Page 18, Suffolk Hills, Lots 45-107 in Book 13 of Maps and Plats at Page 43, Suffolk Hills, Lots 108-195 in Book 14 of Maps and Plats at Page 17 and Suffolk Hills, Resubdivision in Book 15 of Maps and Plats at Page 10, said line also being the north line of the following subdivisions: Catalina Village Subdivision No. 3 in Book 10 of Maps and Plats at Page 26, Westward Look Guest Ranch No. 1, Lots 1-61 in Book 24 of Maps and Plats at Page 22, and Hallmark Plaza, Blocks 1 & 2, in Book 32 of Maps and Plats at Page 51, to the northwest corner of Block 1 of said Hallmark Plaza, said point being on the easterly right-of-way line of the Tucson-Florence Highway (Oracle Road); Continue thence westerly, along said Quarter Section line of said Section 36, to a point on the west right-of-way line of the Tucson-Florence Highway (Oracle Road), said point also being the northeast corner of Lot 8 of Catalina Village Subdivision No. 2, as shown on Book 9 of Maps and Plats at Page 79; THENCE southerly, along the east line of said Lot 8, to the southeast corner of said lot; THENCE westerly, along the south line of said lot, to the southwest corner of said lot, said point lying on the east .a. line of Lot 9 of said plat; THENCE southerly, along the said line, to the northwest corner of Lot 7 of said plat, said point also being the southeast corner of parcel as recorded in Book 9221 of Dockets, at Page 67; THENCE westerly, along the south line of said parcel, to the southwest corner of said parcel, said point lying on the west line of said Lot 9; THENCE northerly, along the west line of said lot, to the south right-of-way line of Chapala Drive; THENCE northwesterly to the intersection of the north right-of-way line of Chapala Drive and west right-of-way line of Northern Avenue, as shown on the plat of Harelson Estates, in Book 16 of Maps and Plats at Page 20; THENCE northerly, along said west right-of-way line of said Northern Avenue, said line also being the easterly line of the following subdivisions: Catalina Citrus Estates in Book 6 of Maps and Plats at Page 24, Harelson Estates in Book 16 of Maps and Plats at Page 20; Bonita Estates, Lots 1-17 in Book 24 of Maps and Plats at Page 25; Casas Lindas Addition, Block 1 in Book 39 of Maps and Plats at Page 66; Campos Adobes, Lots 1-20 in Book 60 of Maps and Plats at Page 67; to the northeast corner of Lot 20 of said Campos Adobes; THENCE northeasterly to the Southwest Quarter corner of said Section 25, said point also being the centerline intersection of Magee Road and Northern Avenue; THENCE northerly, along the west line of said Section 25, to the point of intersection said line and the prolongation of the south right-of-way line of said Hardy Road, said point being the TRUE POINT OF MAP „ %/1/ \.__... /1 SEC.I; 4, _ 7 1 ,. T 12�S J C __- ' i/ I i /4- _._ R_l ;E / ,' NN / 1/1 / / if.,==.2--- 1(„.....„ 1 ._ ,., \ ,..1.1 , tli) /,,______...\ :ii ___ i ..-- ' z," tN i , �- r��- N 14 7 / / / /r---Zz,----- ZZ /( / iL!/ _" 1-----HARDY RO..i / ••� fiii -,,21 J 1 j/11. 1 i ]1_ 1—___---- r.. ........... J ,,7 ,---,..,),),,____ _ ,-- IL -------,„c-- . _ 7rs/ '; '" --�� / / c-`=� 1( )'L ,// 2 ,__,..,..„....-, SEC, 26 Ei / ., ,, --,.. — , r r - o R 1 E r...., _______,_______..„,./ /� ' i, .,. c.//`(-- : — :; 1 ,! ::_____ i _______ ______._ , _ .,?,-,-----,,-, . . ______.. __„- ; . i_-_,,__,..__,,/ /-4------ sy.--_,„ .. ,_, (______.i i ' < ‘-k_i_it---/ ; , , / / _/ _, ' -1 -:--z.) — i r----r- cs, ---9<-:)—- -'---- _ _ _ _ _ ____221,---k- ..52.______] ni 1 1 ........„._, , ____,.,,rv---„i__,______\s- ,...._,__,,,-..._, _ ,,,____-_,-----_\ ------i-rRs Lil-_________/ 47 .1 L'-- 1 r. 7.1 f 1 -_1 _] T f , =-�/ , , N,..-,,,:r.„---- ____3_,/ ____1 rc„...4,-, , f - 1,,cf,:; ""-J , ,,,, , i il I ,____„, „____-_-1_ , —______ ! lw . ri 1 /1\ '1 ____`____J.--_._..... ,.d -C----_ •� i••�.-te-11,.--,,r.,_._.,....,,, ,1_ _,-,i i ---\\ _,---t - ----/- E — 1 !i it_______ / _A Ac. -,.. --7--- . ,>----1 - _T_-- J E--`_- 7/1' IP -r L 0\ I -Rlir_ 1 / I r--,_,2 - . -----7, , � r J 2 --2_.... 1 T 4 1 "C4AM 8:'; i OV RPR .i. 4.,..i .1. • ...:-,J I. 0 , - - At-- Mountain VistaFiareutDhoisrtirziacttion to respectively requests ,;,4 ik,„‘,..„, , ,..,' i„...4, ,.••-- .. ,,, , , annex in Oro Valley from Hardy South . ,... ............ .....,...„ -.....4- .,.. : •-...,,,,,,, • Over 500 property owners already 7 kl_ . 40,1wilm visit_ support this annexation ;1 . FIRE . . .. DISTRICT 1 • Mountain Vista meets Ft1„Oro Valley .. . , .. .. . , „, ,....r. , , ..... standards in the annexation area , „ • 'N ,. •... ,, , ,., 4111it • Oro Valley's General Plan contains at . .., v., .. ,. least 3 Fire Districts . . , , . . .,, fl- ' A. I ..,., ,. .._, ., ..._____21,•, ,,,iii,',. ..., r- ' - *-(1>r , , --..• - . i , / --p •,::::;,...4 il',') , -- , s ._ --'''.''.-4-.-,- T-_-_,--1-, - , • ,,, . , , -144,...,,,,, _ I ) ,,,, . vAIL,Lfy,,..., ORO VALLEY ,--4---1--i--.-- T7,- , r-- ' , , 7 --,-,... .,e ,,,,,.,.._. 1---/---1,—/..._,L,.i) i ..11,12 .1 - ' *:14 -i;;'?:1ir'' --- .i, . , ,. ( 1,,....-...:,,,,,,,t ---.44444,4.-.4., --;'--'4-,''4:,Vet.:'•-e-,: _. itt.,,, ,,. ,,i '' .,1,))4 ,t,i,),,,P,;4.,„ i . i -- t., *-‘1._ I- . • -...4,...'; •--—, ) .1 , , ._, -•,-4.,1;•,z..,.,,E....4.,-, _, P.,.:,-ii.,,,,,t..1...-." „._,,-..., r-..,;_",,,-1):-:-.71 "'""1:-----,1,467::'ic--- ..,..,I-:-„."- ,,,,__..., ,.. ,•4t,1 /"."4"4.4i. 1 ti:•,..-,,,Ariv I.---_,',' ' , 1 ;,. ___.„ .,,4„ _ t ,4,/-44.-:;I:y.! fE-17--:-.,_ -. *".. ,,, • -,- f..:77,;, :i't. c-----vrt--- - ,,,,1.,-,...4.----.?3,4 L 7.0,•,.ii; --,-1t. V I ,,.. 1-.,;,:,.,, 1-7"44-1-j lnett,, ...... ,,,, L1cd,pi.„.. , eid ' -'Li,,-L.,-1 ' , I I • - -L'7-' k<''-fri ' ',-,7-+- . .......J --f'---1-- _, „...,._ c..,-,---/ .:,.,1,... -- -,';:--../L. :-.7--1--- _f+.0.7:-.1--:-,--,,! ,- ‘4,-,- 1-, „..-?--...\Li' [4,- , r , ii, i., p ,,,i. -, .7,,,,/_.,_ ',--__ (4;L___...,,.. ,A. ...&,,,ct:i ,i',-I .;;-',-'i • Ti--'7:5-e.-.:.•-• --r ' -i,*'-... ',,-----'i i..-1':;.\,Y,-- i t-i,1 L''.1.----'-' 1--1/.!--- ....:12: -1-' 4 ADOBES e f/,&'''1,-,Pf,,,,,,,41-44,'i ''. ••• LZ--- 0 ti;„„kr?•';'..!ke‘-,t,EV,--'' .'' ...r'1..... ': '7 '' -,,,,-1.44,.4.-_.41e4-,....1:2F Tiii,V•;,,, < r-u— ,,,,___.....„., _--:_. .s,\,-,--1,41:,,,,, r-lri'A--if-`)• _ ._.'7"!hli -E.:,----ti.r-i' ' . ''le, LA CANADA ''' k:4 ---7.- ' '— '''..,,It•-.r7 ft.-/4;:‘-!'ei.-5; f;:-.:',' ,..„,,, .k.r,,.._ POL,NOCI,1.3 ,,,, ......,_, -V-4-#...--•-.4,<:,!"...-',-, ''k..,4 ,, , ,,,,,,:::.. ' - . 7--, • , f -cc-. , „ ,„.. .-,- -- '-i.ii,.-‘,.'1'• i(.. •,--i:::,':':-..-7! ...... • „v.., . ", ,--:Lii.-•., ;/9- ,..;..L..,, -_'"'-"••••••*,,,Ltii__' ,1::'-i--/-1.-:/is,".'2",---- i 1., - 4,-.L.,., i, ''',.".t f,'-1.--,...., .', i ,•-•,,.f fry .2.,,._1_,,,Z,_/,,,,,-.... 1 , '.... .-1 .i.41 ,' ..• .,.,.... .-,,i, . i ., , E .)1. ., ' ' '-1"" , 1.5:-/-P!'",'- , ,,.., "•<?7' .. r '''..7*''`..•••,.. i '., i-L-L. f ,-,.:4 -'-•---._.r..1,..3 f.!!'1414f:,./::: f:.:::, 41 ,• t.--,,,,,e-.1' -1. r'-f i A . ,... s, 1,:f-,1--6 1 -1.--j'.... .." -• i-I,,,,S i ',I,,. 1. -,-...._.„1,_,. __,• , , , , T •4 06 iiii4kif 1,2 ,': ---i- ORO ,---,,,- . .VALLEY — ----1-it---i-1,-;',---'v7•--1••••I i.-,'..-- ' ' 'r-'-'''''''. ' -)''1 ii ....-•"-"-/ i''4---.1----L.-Li:-j!i __,I'-• -! ' • . t i''''';,..- ..ka, •., r.,.,,,S.,,,47:R.1,,, ____c,'''''',4--.:, ----i-,,F4.4,--,i.. : --,••-17,---7•S;'.fi.44?.:1-:.:.;i: ---- .';'•--.".'-.'''•-• .,--::. • ,5?'•:••1,',:.::::-.;1 r.-if:I- ;;:;:-..-_--- _ _. , ;-----'''..,'','1."'i•;;;,i6,,,, --7....".._ .'.-ill, ., ,_,_...„,„. ...... ...r_...,„ ,:_..::• ki! ' • . , irs,i/1'''' t•. .. -',-,---,,_it'f --, , i ' , . r/ "--0,-- :,' req-1.3-1+5-2-..•': ..... Pr-N; i .-,-,-7-_. -..:.;#-, . . , , ..__t , / •..... ,_i ,,r.-- 3, ., -- ---t---1E4,,,c,...34,-- .-,..:::„. 71*7: t1.__. ,-.; : 11--M... -;,- -'.-- _., - ;•-•'',--'' ,, ,1,c...-±:: 4,-1.4;• - ,,,,,,,,... '. . • / li ...:: ff.: \\-"" . (1'..r---...t94.7 , fri---'11.1",.:4.-.,44, , "-': '3-4' ''' LA CANADA •,P'''.,' ' '.:,. ' , 7-__. (...4"..;•.'1,r;.•-.1.....,.,:...:,"'-4,,,f•;1'''':'''.' . tP\'l'i a 1:kIi4 4'1- 27:VAR V 2.11 . , ---,--1;,: 4,,,14.4.,:t,cl.,...:...:, „7.,%,,•.-.,,,..4,,,,.0,,t. 1_,A CANADA , , ,. .. . - '''' • \ ,-'".t...-:-,,,,-.A'I . _ ,. . ,r,'',:, . - ...• ..,... ...„ ..,.., i fy.,.:J--',,,i „,...Y.),t;<,......,:',,•, • \\:, . •,- 41,-.-;A"),--ii, • --'. ,,,. .•.„••r,...i!,-,.... . . . ‘•, it:•tiV.- , 4, ;.:,..'••140,,,,,,,• \ •';. 't&-4,4'-I,''I.' ::„, '..-3i ‘. L.A,,,,,':.74.,.. / : , r. , . ,-. • , , !i t t,--At,-.,,,;:•.!; :::::,..! ' -,,,'"•.,,,,,ri', i:,:....,S- 7....,r.; , ' • *,\' 1....t.: t...,-/,'' ^,-; •i- • -'-,,1 . i;•"' • 111 —,. .. \‘..,--• :.-.P.• .. 4,( -‘, i,.-- X..,i, ''''', _ '' , ,..t4.,...,..,-..,, y--",,.,, • • . a •-;.::_.1,.../...,44-17..:1-,._ j ( ',, , • i ,-i.,!' ' ',,, ..- k .1 •-: 't.4,1 ,.,..., '- ,., .<?"--', ;-,-,...-.4.-...r:'1.1.- .. --,-3:-.4.,,,.:,"f!,..?,."; t...,... (..-•.' ..e?... ./ l'-:-7—I-14' -- -----•- ti,:-',c,,41,ysj,,,','.i ' f.,-,,,; -... '431.1r,1-Arr.,...-- ' '' '1' ,_ -- . ,,, , r i 1 ' -----.2 , "i"7-7-I-.i..4._, ,-, 1 ''-r,'''• ' — ' . , ', -------1:-.11--1:. .:;::\';---t...--i:; ', ' OROVALLEY,,-,' •i. !,,,• /.1 . i .::,,'-'4*ifixi,Liey„,t---, ,..,... t-/---i_s,.i.., .... •..,„4::. ...‘ ,,,,...... :.„, ' ..i ..,..,..... „..,r,....i.„_-_:,,,..„,:t-4 ' _....''7'''',4-ta,.../",,'''.:-'' •i-t--'"'... '''.--'- - . 1 l'-:-7' • .- . ' ' 5,,,,-•,04,,,,44f7t,,STA: '.''-;'''$ ',r.,----',,...,:.'4.., , , I ..T.• ...•...","-y . -..-Es---1.--- ,.f.4...,.... , • , ,.,,,,- i , ii ,- r•t- - • — , -„,:.\- -_ r-4'.--1.'1',•_ f,, ,r-— . •.4 ' .., --,77--,IL..,---...;.—7fr•I',.,i,.. ,,,, „ , ...„..._ ^‘,",.. ..-i..,,,.).,.1P... -.1,' , , ._•--,', -40- \ V •.;,-4-•.4-1.,.t-- . : i. .. , .---, ;...,. , ,--.',#•,..,,,.f-....f.,..,,,/,, ,.... -, 4,/'•••,i-.' .14-,•. ...- ' • ,j,, ,,...:'. -..1'''..?' f-,J4-'.f 1,'.2'"Ir',? ;9s-':;, 1,,2 -,T:j..4-4 -'• , 011: 7r--------F , ,.,,.- . :.•,,-4-4`....qfy :,..„ •'',..::-.-r; zzt,./..4„.,-,-; ?' 2 jr,7-7,---,,,Tekr.:i. .,,,-,,i ,i,.;c-, . 1 i i r, r) Y J•,r') {I .�• Nn.b ;I!! l^(-*. 4,-,1b �, r�`�f it,et ;, fJ�+u `' 1} i ro t yplaill,r,_'' „�il C{p4tci ) i,.; }� - <)*t .'7' ''''..,•L• )i x', 11 ,. } � ,. ►-i LAMBERT ANNEXATION .�.,-�ris•!t,• J J.1 A% t •:;11.',-t'-'24,1,-,-,--,12'-'7j ( 4r it l ''' , � ,, ,, tcaw,wlr xmi } T a r'' ,f t� i ✓ I 1 +: -— ,_..:_, -- i ORO,VALLEY -►;'” `, (R VAL'1; Y= ' -i- :_:_,_.i. I 1 ! 1 _.,.."4.,,, 'YL..-1...... •i, ._•t1^1F,`lt.'�.'t --1-'"--:;;;Ii,1+ `^ .',:syn,- V,,I� lt.�`Y.: 1011.11010- t is Y-... .. +' if!' -;.:,2,-;. �1 1 _ t ! , t J r .-4,.,, , _,-;,.— , I c'-- 41 ....7::::7,L .- 2 1:Li. ''....‘-‘'....... 1.,.......110;ifi.,,‘,,:,l'i::1*'TAIii VISTA*Hilt Oi' T-��.r! t{ f I r,e,;C,4, L Y;- -r r ''`'''''t'4'4 �/s%4 g16'S'Nrw xi, dC.; - `�,.41') 4 q.t ��' . , ��''G yip • r i2rT';t L /I, ':•_iilj (f S '\ ` e 7r t fir, t .%., ti \t" r• , 1i. i f .. • \, „, ,,..11,.E-..,-.t:."t"•'.',4-i,.., �� n,t .. �, `I .i �'y. qr��}a,,,` l:.�"•` .1.., I -, tit'f,7, 1f 7">, eJ...� ' , _• ' ,` f t✓`j�•••":�:, �� rf - h-f •'�• y 1 x7 r'. .''.41-1 si'1;•1,-",,-4' __,__ e.l_.'' .t L • 3 <). , , , ,lt,.'‘Ift,-,'-.4;4-,,- ,,',") 14.' -• . • , .„ . ,„ . ..,,,,,6.§-,--,-, 'J i 7777✓ i ,� -y':. i4 -) / ..S 1.'. - 1i*-. 'SIJ;I .. ! 1 - _, .yi le 71::‘.^../.. .'' ': :'11.4.,1 PP:2g; i •4.-_-, ::-_- .---,L.----r/ �4_- '3 - iOUNT AIN VtST.A FiRE,DIS,4 VII r _ t-:Szl,ri:./ +,,] f. �' }�,�, TI. tear.a ,{ :; {",tl ti If •j' •. s • .`� ?{' c + , •t +t , ` qtr .1 SUFFOLK HILLS ' (y,t•jI <A, . } """'.��t_'yL" `I,I• ANNEXATION. F J- �) ' ' a _____ L,,, ,..,. ' ,. ., i -;,---2,-ti,.it-:',..:pz,...T.I.---,...:,..,r-- .. , , ._ -, 3 �e= t • _ i.,, ��.,,,,,..;'714,i&:,,,,',,,./,...; �, b e r I _ i,1,;',, r,,- I ' - 1,::.:':: sY -,,:f 1 , ii,:i ----'-i---!-� -,. �,,.•� ORO VALLEY ,:N. -�-: i...'1 I.. r i-C� -� AL` _ ,i-�' r r j-'j �•_...L.4 11 I ,-i ' f ,,'t 1,-.?h-.1;: i..-_, r i.,,,, 4 , }}--1 'i 4. t r -•s.s,; 'k'k _ r -rT?:..�'►Yis r _ Ci -,;,,--..".;„.44.," '.,ti_,+cYpt, � L _" _ ,,r• -CaR^d!t%u� r- +�r.r.,,,.�. - � `t•% •- ,• ,_<,-,:•—•:-:.1 1/ .. „ :s.,:„,1-',4,/..-ii,;:ei ,, ,,,,.., i,,,-:::„,,,,,,,,,,,,,, .',..-1 ,,....,-.7.c--.,..4-,i-t.,. !A '1 -4.''').-'' ''',e,i%/'-'",'•,.::',1,.i . f_ �: 4-41•..a..jam 4•" ? r.;+k:.I�:.;:"-a ��dt i'.i UN i AIN VIS1 A f I(S DIS J Wel 4,a 11- k''''' 7 r I' y r P � �; i��/I;'CA.7 �.�, /"fig H C � .,�b �V - ,., j / 7/ :�� �_ ;,.,,,,,,,,,r,---..:f,r,,-,,,,...1•+► ,+�^f.,1�r t y 11111 "<>. : ' ' :.• -'.••'4( s*�'J t"��,4r , f • {; ,- ,' AMCM,T[C73 ,, I i I/I t r i k 117A),:, }} I IItIL PM PATON .W.MMMA l''''''''."°.' ' i E. ....".:A 7:— .....)4 ---,-..=_.-----____ a. t.,...:-1:1::,-.:-:,,,,. PIE art. y „,.,:r.„.....,---- ,. 1-11:-,i::, i 'tt ': I t —Sill = Mal ,-”'•4 ii•—••••-- ham, -- I I _- ^ 3 fir,{ . r..� .;,,---,,s--4.' q ,c fr �,,•�t, `i/'it,((rte�.. - •"'� P L.�. •r---.� t � tee' —i r •`,..,�..1 r• r 02 MIOd(dA91U1M ...........(1) r 4 I M '._ ,.. ;1::::.::::::::::,,:ir.T.,:C.:... �L�'. " r� rl'1.,A .irk 1 i j. -.A-r-s 1 Nil •• _.__ • , , ,__,...., ,,, ..,,. , _,_.._:_, ,• _.,_,.-_,._---, , 4,..„:._,.... -0Roirm;,w,„4„--... :,_.,.,„ I. VIII • --•-1---.1,-.L.,_J, { r *1-_ 111111111 '. •,•. :. 1 --,,,f••-I :.. 1 , ----.,',,,,,,-7,,,,,..--• ,„•-,•_ fir:f f !f s ' .. f, ','.‘ „ilk:J.] . :itifibi.:If ._, g--c.,..i.-, . ... ., _ ,I., ?M r-71 ::11,::1.,..; /�/, _ __ \:•. �''. • r,,A{�.1#19•'Cb.{,,s Vii XA FlFtfF DtST>rir' - - - / ��"71 '�- FFF 'i.t� :..�i 31'3 3E 1 Nj1p IA x „--j 7.1.4""illepasirrairm:Doz:Llasb 1�MIai.�aAw�10w60ur 1 ii..*001...1414', . .,:,..,::,,.,,„,..—,:—....., POMMY YAM '1 _...,..'s, ,,.... 1 ,,: ', to I , .., l''' a de. - i' 1 ter nits( 0 t t .,.-.1 , ,,..,,,' • FFFF ..-+++tom $ * yA.�As li ' ' 1.6., .-,.” all 111 / _..,.........ate ..-...--- 1-4--==.:-..:,,,,--.=-=.- ...,................. 5 Mb. t , ., . • ..„.. „die'''. 1.1.,411111.IIGIIIIIIIIINIIIIIW' ,,,,,,,,„.„ a .... • „,.......0.- , ...., , •d. 00 , . . . . . .._. . . . . ....,....,,......... „ •. •, ,°.', ,, . - . ..4 . ., , .. . •,,,, . '..• .. . . „':''S': •'- L'.'''' . . • ,i.,,,,,.' . , •. • , •. •,...,. . ....,...„.......„,..• . .. • . . . ... .... -• 4.:','1, '_--.. , , .,,,.. .. . ' 1 .,... , . , I .,,,' •--., .., , ,._........„.,..... , . ,, - .. ........„....,. , • , , ..., • • ..... , - ..,.,......_.............. ..,.., -7)i ,,:s.y• .1 ---- • . ... ... . --• , 7,,,,.. i 1-- 3 • . ,,,, .i. , • • .. .„.. ...., .. . 3% .,.-; • .. .. .. , .. .• , -. • . ..•:, 58.1..5C, - . .., 4EIB4 4 , ,• \ ' t ••,,,...:- fri 24'‘ t.1144 , PLEASElifit i BACIMMET;:::::A*1 I -,,.........• ,,,, •...4 .... „..„ ,,-.P.,.. . ,....•••• ., , . , ' 00f in..- ._... .. .. ,, , , . ., MONTHLY RESPONSE REPORTING ''''. , ,. .-..,,,i,.;,:,,,di, .....,,, k ,'"'f'4,i,.,!us•=.7 'a, zi, , it-,,,,..,, ,,,.. , -.-,..*:i-r.-...,, ' -. i- NIOINI AIN‘')S1 A F IRE 1)1SIRI C 1 6 , • .,,,,,.•.. ,,,r-,... ,,, •, • i ,I • • ),i, r .r.--....,j ma, +ft Vt.!. rit 4E1.1..4 1.F. ?CAI. 1.4.tilbact 1.'0.41 nut ,.. tVIIII047111111.41111 ' f •-1—•• ,/ iiiiiiii VAf: , '1. .,....4.. . ... : .""'.,.. '".;.'•".' ' IN/W,( .;;WM 11,310 .31K,IPALL 1.9 ovr.m mow irk:,,CCINICX..4 CT:V ' ,•i''''',f--4,-.,.....,1 i ,,,,..,-'-‘,,-, .. . ), ,),., 1.4? ,• .12C00 NINA A WPC=3 IRIS«.. 3 N., .2:14,1.:ANS.... gi ''.' d d 'd- , '+' ,t, j It''..:'' •.1:-.• ,,me Se i.111 •NANA IN. ,AN/31I.V7.C7 CIA/S .T4 if IT:714,111'Y.A0111.1,441.4 If.... .14.11 i.L.,41,PINIIJ./WRVIICs..,, 0,3,0 rs-ix 4...,.---i. •• ' ',' .•' , :CI. NUN ttl INA I'M:2 /. ., _i.,, ,,,,.. f:.,.........1.re.,7#,,.-. :Ir.*. :,...1.1, :{X.111011.1 0 r Os CI IONA.C.tr IA 11,!...•CA C..C...IN• c ft.r :.Z. OS,Ar, ,r,1,11120 r,:,If 1.....n.WX...00.1,0,4 V..• C.C4:3 , :C..11.3 14.24.H. 5 ILAINC..r?..., C CIC•Ill :W.wt.,dam Se,C....,, :,..:: , , ....!21.9 !fit,/ 31.•CNN,.1,0 C C.,. 47C.CI.L.C...1,,CAII,XCIAISVIAAKI C.I.C.. \, , ) .,.,„ ' :•xao 5.1!) ,•nies r me, A CATY11.7C,C....,...,455N...,1.,...., eCACII 17f.......ct,...Cif M.A.,. ,T.'1.3 ,17 ' ,,,' 7 ores I I r,..:1 .',We!•D ...,C.: IP.4....,AWNS C..C.Akt.. L r.I' :1"10"16 • tlf ,';', ..,'' :I I.79t. (..A.P. IcCANIT.C.C.I...,ITO, :1,211A '....I7e. I.1,111,1 CINVC ra e AIN .I.C.3.1.0.4.1,3.11•N AK..C.Ar..CAS d ,....,,,,, 2 0 YCI. AMA ATKA 11).1,4 CIACI,CAND;Rs t...5... IN.A.ICANIMOCASC.,CIA A 0 CA,.. .,•.„...,. ' . , ... *--—, ' .-. '-',... . -..,,,..,..,, ,, ,, I--. :f NM 7.311/IA A CAMARO...,E1/41,D,11.NererlAIT AII C CC,• TAA......t ACCV/E.,,.. PC., I; ., , `YAP 1,rss w orn AN, t...... .C.ft ,C....0 VIA,•ANA.......I.NIC.4 17,9.t./.4.4.1401NOCA4lAr CI... 01.3. ,L. ../ • .„. , ,/ r.xa. 21.C.:. IV 11,1.AXON V A:C. ACV INI.I.A.N5.4131....... tal ii . ,''' r 4 71,00 31.1•il ..1.3,NTA NI DM,I ....AI e....,MAMMA MOAN. ' '''.' ,'..tr.''.1''A,/...-‘'' • ''''' .21,11r• tv.), ,,,tc.,....rat 2.0 31.• MN. A t AI At D.0 CE.IX el 5:, ' '• '.'. •' . .' -r113.A.,:i 4.,...' ...' 7..,... )./..I. A IIINNNIA IAN 1r CH,A. AIDN.,fitIr......1......,MCA:CAA.. fir A _ JON 6 --- • MONTHLY RESPONSE REPORTING M* --';',, -.2 - " NSE REPORTING p' -', i: ,-L..._., ..• •... , .,„. it ii,-:,,J;),/,!!:.-;--(,,,ir-:-.,,,..7_,!, ', ,---12 ••4,.....,,,.4 ,,•2 it i ...."....,..i 1.V.1.1 +.1,4 4.1.91../CAL, ,, ‘,-„,,, / ,,-, ,'1.r.ii %7 i•' 1 JUL'16,Ilcor;,_1'i491'92vij 1*2'111 jmz'oll";1" 9(19 MA 4" 11,?, (7:1 20M79 --.;_.j , 7-1 '',,• t • ',, * , i•-•,,,.-••••••,, ...-' '"S"3-.I -0,6 VALLEY --tei, 1P 1661 23q 191 lei 1861 1 r 1 1691 1731 185q 71% 16!. 22..1 .--1-t•-!-,IL L.::... ; -eti,,_,..-...' 1 ... -- ,t,.. ,i:,--, .;,.....,.: --:,•:,„,.,,;,,,.,,. ', L...,,-._.---' 6 Pt -,!';'-,41-1i,:k.,.:‘,.'p:z"...:4''''.,..,,-,,-‘,-.\--- . JUL 41.K., $t r. Qr., Nvy rii,..•,.. .,.,,t; ,,? 1,1,:k .1, ,,I.,-,r ..t.,t .,,,,ti,...-.,,.j.,-: r, • i,' 'ri,,,.-6,.., i ••• •--- :......,...!,.,,--, , ../.-y...... •,•:. ,......E r sirisr4 • -11, '4 10 12 I:• !... l'IC.h-..''-'':.-; ';'•••,••:2:.-. 1 , i 1 ••1-'••-•-•7--;.,..--'4'-1.•....1 _ p,,,,,,,,,,,,t,, 4, .---i7-`;/'.-•,-,--,L',-:;'l ,.....- MVFD ANNUAL RESPONSES ti4'-'"-----L-.Q,•,,r.,1 If.-,' •••/:," #I -,.... • 11. WO- ----, -r. .,. ,,,. , sa,r,..i. ,,,.„...„: , ,.....,:,„,;...„.•••,•:;:•--,:-...,,, - -,--•-•-.,•• ,,, / 1 50 - -- _,- .1.,..:Nk.NCr"---., ,... ......... . , ', ' .4 .... . __:__ •• . , '....,. 4 r .' 0 . • .. s,,. -........... . I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 I , , ,r.'!!:"..i!..,,.Y1.i:j-.,..t:-,i7...,-t,;,'-'7,-/....!i.-_, --;------ • .,• 7.7, ---'.........._1 .., .; , i ,. , „ , - , , ...• • .''??^' • i..,• ,i i.:pi,,,,,,-.:, ..,:::•i;• ,. , E)06,1:-Ii..:11'41,:i,-; 11A.s-L.•,.,..wif. .i'i.,',. . , . .• , i 2::,,,-7,,,/,. . .f I .-t;P:.''' i • . ) 17)43;,,,,,,i1.y, , _ 't ,,.,, :,.,'.3,.::.:'7,..::?..z,-,>_,!..1/.~;',•—:i . — .. ,•.•• ..jr--- i . , ..,74 .,,.,,-.--,-,P, .. ' \ jt.'5i,,--/1--;''.-.-T4'.•-•-.;,"'5, 1 /iCi'S:::...•:' ,,i.11.4 I *.•-.....-- c 5%,.. ,..:::::./...:.•--,—.... .,,,A.,.,,.,,...L i -, e-s:,'" 14;-?.?,-- '. / • . , . . ',:',-.,_ ,i..,--,wz-u-r.,•t. ,,• • . ,- 1.,, - _.... r-7.,,-.,.-..,..•-.:. . ' 7' :14 „,- /- ; 4. -.:.,•'''',r ; . . ., / 1.(-!,-'s.:'---,:,'-',2-1i'::Fl.,,•f'?-4 K'''.. 'r'L..' :r.," 1-1-'ii...PC:41,:'::';:•:'4::;,...,."',41,-"`".!..!':2;1?,`„,:i.,1,-e't-t.,.....:,..,(.: , . , -1-i:E4c,_-,., -.4,,., •,,0-4,..,2,,,,,L,,,,...„, , , ---i-,-- -..4.• . -,:•-..,•• , •,li•;14t,:r-424,,," ' •-•i ..., ..._ :"-:",...1"...i't I, 11 ,..'8 ./„',...4:•;',....1 1471 0777 42....)f,...„.... I .....c...1.,....„ . &18' i Y.,i• , , ,. 8, .i ,---,:" -r•••.-,..; • r.i,-,1:4"-•••/'-'•--,/.•''''...'•„,-"-1 ..1,1-14 ::: ‘• 4.• . . .. r, r- V.--t7r71':**'' •).4-.. , -,,,,••.„..i.:„.•."• , r, `.• ,•• •.. '''Z: • '',...,;;11 4'1•.'•''., 7 I. Town of Oro Valley Performance Standards �. RO'V14l.LEY Resolution 07-32 March 07,2007 1 _. y�, Fire Service Provider Performance Criteria 74" , , , ...............ft Fire Valley StandardP Com Rance Att}t#I'A N VISTA FIRE•F`t ?+ r,'. . First unit on scene within 6 minutes 90%of the time for all Standard monitored, 1 tiro emergencies reported and met .:), 4 ,1 Two units on scene within 8 minutes 90%of the time for all Standard monitored, i' +�` 2 structure tires reported and met ::.0.--;•( Certified engines and water tenders sufficient enough to standard monitored. 3 maintain 250 gallons per minute water fora minimum of reported and met x, two hours . i : I ► .r • First unit on scene within 5 minutes 90%of the time for all Standard monitored, ' ' 4 medical emergencies reported and met 1 1qty i a. -- ` AIS t';+t��Ix'rI capable unit on scene within 8 minutes 90% Standard monitored, l '~ 4 �y 5 of the time for all medical emergencies reported and met r', r 1 f. Town of Oro Valley Performance Standards Town of Oro Valley Performance Standards Resolution 07-32 March 07,2007 Resolution 07-32 March 07,2007 Requisite Duty and Responsibility Standards for Oro valley Fire Requisite Duty and Responsibility Standards for Oro valley Fire Service Providers Service Providers Oro Valley Standard Compliance Oro Valley Standard Compliance 1 Four(4)person Engine and ladder Companies Standard met One tender(4)our g P 8 Two water tenders assigned to Oro Valley station 2 One Supervisor,One Paramedic and One Driver Engineer per Standard met Engine and ladder Company State Fire Marshal,NI-PA or ICC certified Fire Inspectors 9 shall perform annual inspections on all commercial Standard met 3 One Paramedic and One Emergency Medical Technician per Standard met occupancies Ambulance Engines,ladders and tenders will be maintained to ISO Standard met 4 One AIS Engine or Ladder Company for every station in Oro Standard met 111 standards Valley titandard met 11 liazMat responses will be in compliance with local,state and Standard met 5 Two AIS ambulances assigned to Oro Valley federal regulations Four National Wildland Coordination group certified Standard met at the one Mandatory non-emergency services,public education and fire Standard met 6 firefighters assigned to two or more fire stations in Oro station in Oro Vali. 12 prevention services Valley one brush truck at thel t Documentation confirming compliance with performance Standard mcg A minimum of two type six brush trucks assigned to one or7 tore static►n in Ou standards within two days of request more fire stations in Oro Valley 8 f ` 40 . y i. _rg //'r yr a ORO VALLEY 7 I _ !, ; {•YT"_ •. . -fir..,/ - .Y • :x /°?.? ` ,ham tki3tJ 41 A/1 V`tS714 FPI F:' t i`�3iC I r 1 c;Ej mii � , „., -.. mi., / 1 , ,f ! y4, �!�j/ ".-._._ may �� �,1 ., �' , -, .` I /'•-+✓.�.�';• ,�s f! p °�f ,r y '—`'�-0._m._. , .,.... _. . ... .`I y->.., .! .. ,_7, J' �sf�.�.If------,-. __fir`'`L-?'../i..''. #2- ,)-J'm' I •,. - � , j`• ��� f Y. ,t' I'i'4, ! -lY; ..:- ,j }_ '„r j"- `i j r i i i.";47�/: ` i -,,;.--7:11.;:,t - i44^'y, -, #� {ilr ! 1 r `1r t.. L�/ ��'� Ll r � )i " I•F >,, r y ^,, _ ,i )Y r" 1 imp ' j•.7..• �,I! ' •� _.11::--,., !! �y•r�'� i ./r ;�. '1•''+d it-, ' ± ' I 1 '! 1,- 1 '•« /TT r.1,,, i.."Z.1 J . ,�•r''.11'� ,I • �+�y r fr5..N f .� w,, / -1,--, /.t,,,--,4 ..., '��l J i..�� ,-1 r•...+ '^(, '�''_<s-r! ! �:, I r'. • a6 "rwiX ` , .1t‘1- /' .-,'J � t . I 1 ti i r.•7 .••7-•}�.J, ;tlj i r i f....1„,,,,, ,,,,r. ti,, , } ,"j_�1 ` '",-...t.{. r 4 .� ,•J .,., ,A 1.: ;!�I ' K7 • ,J..i /_/ 'L 1 f- -.Al•I C f ". ..\,,,,,,, 4• '...'y!"`f�C'•„. '"� ?.,. "Ilrf • VALLEY 7"."1....72 ORO ,,�, ORO VALLEY - 1` It __i L �1Y t.....L.Le ' Y--- r i w- 10044,'"-- a 1b -'�4. ,_l r j ..�. o f`•f i �7�v l i`-i A c is f(�ar�K;ff." • J .r e f U Aill YiSttit Fid t i /1 I (, Q I tip i r 2 tete 1,,,,,0- , 7-11 /-•'. . - `{ y _ ' 1,t v —o %,--1 tii,,-.1.,,--r--,2; , ,• , ,,2„0,4. ,,,,,,:47,:"-4,-,',.1.., t t t . 40e,.. .,, ,._. , „, _. ,....,, , _ !` i-�6 ''et-l4,- . •: j 1 ,�:�+..,.t .;t '^.•,.'!, � .C-'l,�_ lt-r--• .t•iN = r ._. .„.,0.,.,- 1, , ..ti t: ' ''r 1 t I'/-7:..,E. •SA."' 's--1,L.,..Z.:. 'I 9 111M=11, S 'C.-,Y<`.t r Y.tLQ Sf°'`.t./' r N 1 Mw 1 '! t :,,t, p VALLEY ' F j.,sr _ 1♦.F 4 1S !6 J � r _,___ 1f8 f I I e i r „ 0 j , � t , r '-mow,.. t 't5T;�F3r1E-i7ty'ift�;`i f i-•_ r f t r ✓ „t_ t a7, Q�.l -e ..,.',...,, ‘ , :.,•,, ,...... ,',.::::1,,,-7.. ---7-7---7.. ..., .., , , ,,,_7. .-,,,44.--A r-'----...: -,--„-._, r. tic, �/ y. r[_� 1 ,; + ,C..r.s.- L� {/h'(}f�,•.��J `'.K,• �.hJ' �:,,/,.i! -i t:,..-7 •�' +^-1,,,,,,,;.*,.....,;/• Z; f^•'�'! 1 t .1 • / 17fir"t �� f f - i7,.:.;.., n '-(.��f f 1`'�..:5. �_.,7..,I,.L..,.tr* '�' ,./r-' rt`'..,r+N`.'v+''r ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,--••,`",,11,. ,e � -I' 1.7,1-=1-1.i.' i V.E• - 'L.. , y}: ' rJ �< tom•...�J ._ y.......}• -' GOLDER RANCH FIRE DISTRICT >I fire*Wm.4..1 e,, Vista Fire District r',.1, 33,,,,,Sciww th E.nManch Drive (11.... t4 %mon/gizmo p*,7+5 respectively requests authorization to tS2GfgY-4100,,FAX f 20,,31,144,) C:h,er•kti,crrk annex in Oro Valley from Hardy South March 10 2009 Mayor and Council Members. • Over 500 property owners already In the interest of public safety and after lengthy discussion.both the Golder Ranch and support this annexation the Mountain Vista Fire District's Board of Directors respectively,unanimously approved the Golder Ranch Fire District annexation project from Hardy Road north and the Mountain Vista Fee District annexation project horn Hardy Road south within the Town • Mountain Vista meets al! Oro Valley of Oro Valley.If Mountain Vista Fire District is allowed to annex into the To Nn from the • southern border up to the southern right of way of Hardy Road.Go,der Ranch Fire standards in the annexation area District will not oppose it. • Oro Valley's General Plan contains at } least 3 Fire Districts John Fink.Fire Chief Goder Ranch Fire District 10 .r i ' .fir. I "In the interest of public safety and after lengthy discussion,both the Golder Ranch and the Mountain �.....:. �s`.. ...Y : Vista Fire District's Board of Directors respectively "�� unanimously approved the Golder Ranch Fire District V Or VE-1 VIM annexation project from Hardy Road north and the Mountain Vista District annexation project from Hardy 1*`• te-•M I AM/...12go Road south within the Town of Oro Valley. If Mountain09 Vista Fire District is allowed to annex into the Town from .-6- (9 , the southern border up to Hardy Road,Golder Ranch Fire , District will not oppose it." _ , INN L • , -John Fink AEI e' -'14#14 7,,,,, Fire Chief --, Golder Ranch Fire Department Mountain Vista Fire District ISO RATING respectively requests authorization to as of February 2007 annex in Oro Valley from Hardy South • La Canada Fire District • Over 500 property owners already -Class 3 p p • Heritage Hills Fire District support this annexation —Class 4 • Mountain Vista meets pli Oro Valley • North Ranch/Linda Vista standards in the annexation area -Class 3/8B • Oro Valley's General Plan contains at least 3 Fire Districts Mountain Vista Fire District is working with ISO on a new consolidated rating. 11 s . I. ` "r' '' �'�- r�. i 1 I, Town of Oro ValleyPerformance Standards 04040)14„,,,, u,, `it � ,.rar.„�,. .1- ,�b ii/ILO :. /4,9 i 1� �"F � :-7 ; ..i ^1.4'i j Resolution 07-32 March 07,2007 t �r. -T- "�'� ` 4 ~f r ',-`f ` I i`� Fire Service Provider Performance Criteria 1..,`_-�_ ,, ...t` ; ORO VALLEY' ' -' '• ' 1. 90%of the time,first responders to fire Y �� , �� - --);k7 S emergencies in the Town of Oro Valley arrive ,v ' f r "' iI L on scene within six minutes from receipt of the 4F34-1; call by the responding units,within a single -, '.+ Ha..,y, -F _ reporting month. ---7711r 11141110/0100 II,,� ti ; �;�4 o We monitor,report and meet this standard. ,, f 4 a .� -J I Town of Oro Valley Performance Standards Town of Oro Valley Performance Standards Resolution 07-32 March 07,2007 Resolution 07-32 March 07,2007 Fire Service Provider Performance Criteria Fire Service Provider Performance Criteria 2. 90%of the time, in the Town of Oro Valley,two 3. Annually the Town of Oro Valley shall verify fire fighting units shall arrive on scene to a that all fire provider(s)who service the town structural fire within eight minutes from receipt shall supply certified engines and water of call,within a single reporting month. tenders sufficient enough to maintain 250 gallons per minute water supply for a minimum We monitor,report and meet this standard. of two hours. We have not been asked to monitor and report this standard,but can and will upon request. 12 Town of Oro Valley Performance Standards Town of Oro Valley Performance Standards Resolution 07-32 March 07,2007 Resolution 07-32 March 07,2007 Requisite Duty and Responsibility Standards for Oro valley Fire Fire Service Provider Performance Criteria Service Providers 4. 90%of the time, in the Town of Oro Valley, 11. Hazardous Material responses shall be units dispatched to medical emergencies shall provided in compliance with local,state,and arrive on scene with five minutes from receipt federal regulations. of the call by the responding units,within a single reporting month. We meet this standard. We monitor,report and meet this standard. ' 39 - y > S/:o4R f fP-Yf,,�,5 '3f"t ., Sa.sy. ;M wt{d k :: f Y ,Kyo,,',yA.F ''9��5�i t R a a+. .4f��Yy rr,, ,s a n fi v t 'y dr � �"r,�5`Sy�S Y fr fe <Spy,�,2��.h4Y<nj �A>x���r�S2 hfA f�rf �t 4 �� tx�' h� 5j`?�'Tdi4'i'r�'1�.0`'Finf kj3 rr�' w^"R'a�r N. .`�..`"?��/f 7 r i'< . y % 1 Ci Town of Oro Valley Performance Standards N rf :„r,.,,,• y.„, ' °�5; Resolution 07-32 March 07,2007 ,--1...,,,_1 � .x-t". ; ;4{.4;,, ,r ;- ' -l-Y..y..ti`r.` ; 1.l W it f; ••,a4 .� ! - j� Requisite Duty and Responsibility Standards for Oro valley Fire !-.!.. _ �� -1-4.... ,-4 .- 11.7,5",. i ., Service Providers .' ;i-., r 1 )'t1-4 ...4,- '1 r Y ORO VALLEY 13. Reasonable documentation that confirms compliance with these r t+ -4÷.;./.)..i_,•-a h ,� ,. , Y., performance standards shall be provided with two working days of -`i-i',:` • -, '� _ ` -- t; r , request,to include but not limited to: moi'' -,� j ''�v -,Si: • Equipment inventory _�� { f /�`�#J yZ.T R.. ,. y, • Hose and pumptest records .`. ., ., rte,,. . '., 1 • Hydrant test and maintenance _ , -,----i.,4 , T • Commercial fire inspections ' ' '' "4 - ' _ • Ladder certification tests -=r'--�'.`„` �” '_� 1' 7 1_'`J,; _ • • Duty rosters ',t k;? _ t ..�, ,•`rf�''. 1 z, ;r i,' • Personnel status and certifications 'Ti -�C"-t '- 70:',0' r",•s -=?" f<, .---,=• Mutual aid agreements e� 1 --5 u7 �_._ J`-cz�a ' • Training and dispatch records _ i,LA `" < meet thisstandard.'1,.1. i. .,,*� ::-1,31j14,1 `1 �. C ♦ r~ ^r-r-.t _. - I We '''''',__ '.. (,::.iii.c.P'.„ic,p‘:,-17.).,.-L-,tc-":42fly.4-: -;"I'. ' \ ''''/-:`,,24,1,:•:`,-,;2"7-'1:, , .4-___.. „4., ,;_,-:'- ,L., 13 c,OzE F */ ,��� , GOLDER RANCH FIRE DISTRICT r.../�. • Fire ♦Rescue •Medical r 3885 E. Golder Ranch Drive Tucson Arizona 85739 9ANCtk (520)825-9001 /FAX (520)825-8043 �f Chief John Fink March 10, 2009 Mayor and Council Members, In the interest of public safety and after lengthy discussion, both the Golder Ranch and the Mountain Vista Fire District's Board of Directors respectively, unanimously approved the Golder Ranch Fire District annexation project from Hardy Road north and the Mountain Vista Fire District annexation project from Hardy Road south within the Town of Oro Valley. If Mountain Vista Fire District is allowed to annex into the Town from the southern border up to the southern right of way of Hardy Road, Golder Ranch Fire District will not oppose it. Sincerely, 16)._/ 7>2:) Pr John Fink, Fire Chief Golder Ranch Fire District TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 3 Page 1 of 2 '7OUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: 04/01/09 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: DAVID ANDREWS, TOWN MANAGER SUBJECT: NARANJA TOWN SITE: CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE APPROVAL OF FORMATION OF BLUE RIBBON COMMITTEE AND/OR CITIZEN/VOTER SURVEY TO INCLUDE FACILITIES NEEDS ASSESSMENT SUMMARY: At the February 25, 2009 Study Session, the Town Council discussed the Naranja Town Site Implementation Plan Concept and the numerous options for the property in light of the failed bond election to support funding of the project. Options included holding public hearings or forums, conducting a needs assessment, and/or the creation of a blue ribbon task force. During the discussion it became clear that several options were worthy of further consideration and at the request of Mayor Loomis this item has been placed on this evening's agenda for Council consideration. Below are the three options that came forward from the February 25th Study Session. Option A: Blue Ribbon Committee 'he first option for Council consideration is the appointment of a Blue Ribbon Committee of residents to look the site and recommend an implementation plan for use of the property. One member could be appointed by each member of the seven Council Members to comprise a majority of the committee, with the option to have a Council Member and a management staff representative serving as part of the committee as well. Staff expertise that could support the committee would include Parks & Recreation, Finance, Building Safety/Architecture, and Engineering. Option B: Citizen/Voter Survey and/or Needs Assessment The second option for consideration is a survey of Oro Valley residents or, more specifically, Oro Valley voters who participated in November's election to determine their needs, wants, and willingness to pay. The results could be used to plan the park over a 10-year horizon of build out. Examples of stakeholders would include user groups such as recreation and sports teams, the arts (visual and performing), senior citizens and youth. Option C: Table item The final option for consideration is a vote to table the item indefinitely or until a specific meeting in the future. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost estimates for a citizen survey 7 minutes in length (about 15 -17 questions, no more than 2 open-ended questions) is around $7,500. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Page 2 of 2 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: 04/01/09 POSSIBLE MOTIONS: I move to approve option(s) for the Naranja Town Site OR I move to... David Andrews, Town Manager