Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPackets - Council Packets (796) AGENDA ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION May 16, 2018 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CAÑADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS COUNCIL REPORTS DEPARTMENT REPORTS The Mayor and Council may consider and/or take action on the items listed below: ORDER OF BUSINESS: MAYOR WILL REVIEW THE ORDER OF THE MEETING INFORMATIONAL ITEMS CALL TO AUDIENCE – At this time, any member of the public is allowed to address the Mayor and Town Council on any issue not listed on today’s agenda. Pursuant to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, individual Council Members may ask Town Staff to review the matter, ask that the matter be placed on a future agenda, or respond to criticism made by speakers. However, the Mayor and Council may not discuss or take legal action on matters raised during “Call to Audience.” In order to speak during “Call to Audience” please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. PRESENTATIONS 1.Proclamation - Kids to Parks Day 2.Presentation - 2018 Transportation Art by Youth Summer Program CONSENT AGENDA (Consideration and/or possible action) A.Minutes - May 2, 2018 B.Fiscal Year 2017/18 Financial Update through March 2018 C.Appointments to the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) D.Resolution No. (R)18-18, authorizing "The First Amendment to Communications Site Lease Agreement" ("Amendment") to clean up the Lease and reduce the price and lease escalation rate REGULAR AGENDA 1.PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING ORDINANCE NO. (O)18-07, REZONING FROM R1-144 TO PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT FOR APPROXIMATELY 199-ACRES LOCATED WEST OF LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD BETWEEN LAMBERT LANE AND NARANJA DRIVE AND 8.2-ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD AND NARANJA DRIVE 2.AMENDING SECTION 28 OF THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REGARDING THE ALLOWED USES AND SIZES OF ELECTRONIC MESSAGE BOARDS ON MONUMENT SIGNS a. RESOLUTION NO. (R)18-17, DECLARING THE PROPOSED ZONING CODE AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 28 RELATED TO ELECTRONIC MESSAGE BOARDS, PROVIDED IN EXHIBIT "A" WITHIN THE ATTACHED RESOLUTION AND FILED WITH THE CLERK, A PUBLIC RECORD b. PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE NO. (O)18-08, AMENDING CHAPTER 28 OF THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE ALLOWING ELECTRONIC MESSAGE BOARDS ON MONUMENT SIGNS FOR PRIVATE SCHOOLS AND RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS 3.PUBLIC HEARING: RESOLUTION NO. (R)18-19, AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING INCREASES IN WATER RATES AND SERVICE FEES FOR THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY 4.PUBLIC HEARING: RESOLUTION NO. (R)18-20, ADOPTION OF THE TENTATIVE BUDGET FOR FY 2018/19 AND SETTING THE LOCAL ALTERNATIVE EXPENDITURE LIMITATION FOR FY 2018/19 FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS (The Council may bring forth general topics for future meeting agendas. Council may not discuss, deliberate or take any action on the topics presented pursuant to ARS 38-431.02H) CALL TO AUDIENCE – At this time, any member of the public is allowed to address the Mayor and Town Council on any issue not listed on today’s agenda. Pursuant to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, individual Council Members may ask Town Staff to review the matter, ask that the matter be placed on a future agenda, or respond to criticism made by speakers. However, the Mayor and Council may not discuss or take legal action on matters raised during “Call to Audience.” In order to speak during “Call to Audience” please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. ADJOURNMENT POSTED: 5/9/18 at 5:00 p.m. by pp When possible, a packet of agenda materials as listed above is available for public inspection at least 24 hours prior to the Council meeting in the office of the Town Clerk between the hours of 8:00 a.m. – 5:00p.m. The Town of Oro Valley complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If any person with a disability needs any type of accommodation, please notify the Town Clerk’s Office at least five days prior to the Council meeting at 229-4700. INSTRUCTIONS TO SPEAKERS Members of the public have the right to speak during any posted public hearing. However, those items not listed as a public hearing are for consideration and action by the Town Council during the course of their business meeting. Members of the public may be allowed to speak on these topics at the discretion of the Chair. If you wish to address the Town Council on any item(s) on this agenda, please complete a speaker card located on the Agenda table at the back of the room and give it to the Town Clerk. Please indicate on the speaker card which item number and topic you wish to speak on, or if you wish to speak during “Call to Audience”, please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. Please step forward to the podium when the Mayor announces the item(s) on the agenda which you are interested in addressing. 1. For the record, please state your name and whether or not you are a Town resident. 2. Speak only on the issue currently being discussed by Council. Please organize your speech, you will only be allowed to address the Council once regarding the topic being discussed. 3. Please limit your comments to 3 minutes. 4. During “Call to Audience” you may address the Council on any issue you wish. 5. Any member of the public speaking must speak in a courteous and respectful manner to those present. Thank you for your cooperation. Town Council Regular Session 1. Meeting Date:05/16/2018 Proclamation - Kids to Parks Day Information Subject Proclamation - Kids to Parks Day Summary Attachments Proclamation Town Council Regular Session 2. Meeting Date:05/16/2018 Presentation - 2018 Transportation Art by Youth Summer Program Information Subject Presentation - 2018 Transportation Art by Youth Summer Program Summary Attachments No file(s) attached. Town Council Regular Session A. Meeting Date:05/16/2018 Requested by: Mike Standish Submitted By:Michelle Stine, Town Clerk's Office Department:Town Clerk's Office Information SUBJECT: Minutes - May 2, 2018 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: N/A BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: N/A SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to approve, (approve with the following changes) the May 2, 2018 minutes. Attachments 5-2-18 Draft Minutes 5/2/18 Minutes, Town Council Budget Study Session / Regular Session 1 MINUTES ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL BUDGET STUDY SESSION / REGULAR SESSION May 2, 2018 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE BUDGET STUDY SESSION AT OR AFTER 3:00 PM CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hiremath called the meeting to order at 3:01 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT:Satish Hiremath, Mayor Lou Waters, Vice Mayor Joe Hornat, Councilmember Rhonda Piña, Councilmember Bill Rodman, Councilmember Mary Snider, Councilmember Steve Solomon, Councilmember BUDGET STUDY SESSION AGENDA 1.FY 2018/19 TOWN MANAGER’S RECOMMENDED BUDGET DEPARTMENT OVERVIEWS Mayor Hiremath announced the first budget presentation would be from the Police Department, followed by the Water Utility Department, the Town Administration Department and the Benefits Overview. Police Department Oro Valley Police Chief Danny Sharp gave an overview of the proposed Police Department budget that included the following: - Fiscal year comparison - Reductions Explained - Capital - Town of Oro Valley Strategic Plan and Public Safety - Community Vision, Values and Priorities - Departmental Approach - Conclusion 5/2/18 Minutes, Town Council Budget Study Session / Regular Session 2 Following the presentation, there were questions and comments from Council regarding the proposed Police Department budget. Water Utility Oro Valley Water Utility Director Peter Abraham gave an overview of the proposed Water Utility budget that included the following: - Oro Valley Water Utility - Water Rates Analysis Results - Operating Fund Budget - Operating Fund Expenses - Personnel - Operating Fund Expenses - O&M - Operating Fund Expenses - Capital - Operating Fund Expenses - Debt Service - Impact Fee Funds Following the presentation, there were questions and comments from Council regarding the proposed Water Utility budget. Town Administration Finance Director Stacey Lemos gave an overview of the proposed Town Administration budget highlights: - Town Administration - Town Administration Highlights - Town Clerk - Administrative Service - Town Manager's Office - General Administration Following the presentation, there were questions and comments from Council regarding the proposed Town Administration budget. Benefits Overview Human Resource Director Gary Bridget introduced Eric Rustand, Arizona Market Leader and Benefits Consultant for CBIZ. Mr. Rustand gave an overview of the following proposed Benefit budget highlights: - Self-Funded Health Insurance Overview - Cost Overview - Healthcare Premium Contributions 5/2/18 Minutes, Town Council Budget Study Session / Regular Session 3 Mr. Bridget continued the presentation regarding the proposed Benefit budget highlights and included the following: - Employee Onsite Clinic - FY 18/19 Medical Plan Contribution Share - FY 18/19 Dental Plan Contribution Sharet - Additional Benefits Following the presentation, there were questions and comments from Council regarding the proposed Benefits budget. Councilmember Snider requested that Council consider discussing funding for playground equipment at Naranja Park at the May 9th budget study session in her absence. ADJOURNMENT OF THE BUDGET STUDY SESSION MOTION:A motion was made by Vice Mayor Waters and seconded by Councilmember Solomon to adjourn the meeting at 5:09 p.m. MOTION carried, 7-0. REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hiremath called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT:Satish Hiremath, Mayor Lou Waters, Vice Mayor Joe Hornat, Councilmember Rhonda Piña, Councilmember Bill Rodman, Councilmember Mary Snider, Councilmember Steve Solomon, Councilmember PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Onita Davis of the Oro Valley American Legion Auxiliary led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS Town Clerk Mike Standish announced the upcoming Town meetings and events. 5/2/18 Minutes, Town Council Budget Study Session / Regular Session 4 COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Snider recognized Sage Garcia, an eighth grade student from Wilson K-8, for excelling both academically and athletically. Vice Mayor Waters reported that he and Councilmember Hornat attended Ironwood Ridge High School on April 30th where they held mock interviews that provided students with interview experience for college and future employers. DEPARTMENT REPORTS Town Clerk Mike Standish announced that new artwork was on display in the Council Chambers by artist William Binks. ORDER OF BUSINESS Mayor Hiremath reviewed the order of business and stated that the order would stand as posted. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS There were no informational items. CALL TO AUDIENCE Terry Parish spoke regarding his appreciation for Council, the Police Depart, volunteers, and Town Staff. PRESENTATIONS 1.Presentation by Bring the Wall, Inc. Dan Bradshaw, representing Bring the Wall, spoke regarding his experience with The Wall That Heals event held in Oro Valley and thanked Council and staff for their contributions that helped make this event successful. Representatives of Bring the Wall, Inc., provided a financial and volunteer overview of the event. Representatives of Bring the Wall, Inc., presented a $4000.00 check to the Southern Arizona Veterans and First Responders Living Memorial. 2.Proclamation - Purple Heart Town Mayor Hiremath proclaimed that Oro Valley is a Purple Heart Town in the state of Arizona. 5/2/18 Minutes, Town Council Budget Study Session / Regular Session 5 Adjutant John Moore and Commander with the Ft. Lowell Chapter 442 Mike Dyer accepted the proclamation. 3.Proclamation -Oro Valley American Legion Auxiliary Poppy Days Mayor Hiremath proclaimed May 25 - 28, 2018 as the Oro Valley American Legion Auxiliary Poppy Days. Onita Davis, Representative of the Oro Valley American Legion Auxiliary, gave an overview on the symbolism of the red Poppy and encouraged citizens to support the American Legion by donating during their Poppy Days fundraisers. 4.Proclamation - 2018 YMCA Community Military Ball Mayor Hiremath proclaimed November 2018 as Military Family Month in Oro Valley and urged all citizens to show their support and participate in the 2018 YMCA Community Military Ball held on Saturday, November 10, 2018. Major General John Almquist and Major General Edward Maxwell accepted the proclamation. 5.Presentation of Certificates of Appreciation to outgoing members of the Youth Advisory Council Constituent Services Coordinator Jessica Hynd and Councilmember Mary Snider gave an overview of the Youth Advisory Council including their vision and their many accolades. Mayor Hiremath, Councilmember Snider and Ms. Hynd presented Certificates of Appreciation to the following outgoing members of the Youth Advisory Council: Present Not Present Chloe Noll Jaclyn Simmons-Rolins Katie Frye Nandini Sodhi Tanya Sandhu Travis Dobbin Casey Fetkenhour Mikayla Kaber 6.Presentation of the Historic Preservation Commission’s 2018 Historical Expository Writing Contest winners Recreation and Cultural Services Manager Lynanne Dellerman gave an overview of the Historic Preservation Commission's 2018 Historical Expository Writing Contest including 5/2/18 Minutes, Town Council Budget Study Session / Regular Session 6 the qualifications to enter the contest. Ms. Dellerman also recognized the following contest winners: 1st place - Hailey Rawn 1st place - Elijah Smith 2nd place - Jack Selleck 3rd place - Lena Rosenbaum Honorable Mention - Navaeh Huffman CONSENT AGENDA A.Minutes - April 18, 2018 MOTION:A motion was made by Vice Mayor Waters and seconded by Councilmember Snider to approve Consent Agenda item (A). MOTION carried, 7-0. REGULAR AGENDA 1.PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PROPOSED SURGICAL OFFICE, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ORACLE ROAD AND APPROXIMATELY 1/4 MILE SOUTH OF HARDY DRIVE Senior Planner Millini Simms presented item #1 and included the following: - Purpose - Conditional Use Permit Review Criteria - Summary and Recommendation Discussion ensued amongst Council and staff regarding item # 1. Representing the applicant, Vice President of ASC Facility Development Jason Marnin addressed Council questions. Mayor Hiremath opened the public hearing. No comments were received. Mayor Hiremath closed the public hearing. MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Rodman and seconded by Councilmember Piña to approve the request for a conditional use permit for a proposed surgical office finding the request is in conformance with the Conditional Use Permit Review Criteria. 5/2/18 Minutes, Town Council Budget Study Session / Regular Session 7 MOTION carried, 7-0. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS No future agenda items were requested. CALL TO AUDIENCE No comments were received. ADJOURNMENT MOTION:A motion was made by Vice Mayor Waters and seconded by Councilmember Rodman to adjourn the meeting at 7:05 p.m. MOTION carried, 7-0. Prepared by: __________________________ Michelle Stine, CMC Deputy Town Clerk I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the budget study / regular session of the Town of Oro Valley Council of Oro Valley, Arizona held on the 2nd day of May, 2018. I further certify that the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present. Dated this _____ day of ____________________, 2018. ___________________________ Michael Standish, CMC Town Clerk Town Council Regular Session B. Meeting Date:05/16/2018 Requested by: Stacey Lemos Submitted By:Wendy Gomez, Finance Department:Finance Information SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2017/18 Financial Update through March 2018 RECOMMENDATION: This item is for information only. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: In the General Fund (see Attachment A), revenues collected through March totaled $28.2 million, or 77.6% of the budget amount of $36.3 million. Year-to-date expenditures through March totaled $25.6 million, or 69.7% of the budget amount of $36.7 million. In the Highway Fund (see Attachment B), revenues collected through March totaled $2.6 million, or 66.9% of the budget amount of $3.8 million. Year-to-date expenditures through March totaled $2.7 million, or 55.2% of the budget amount of $4.9 million. In the Bed Tax Fund (see Attachment C), revenues collected through March totaled $1.1 million, or 100.3% of the budget amount of $1.1 million. Year-to-date expenditures through March totaled $763,238, or 60.9% of the budget amount of $1.3 million. In the Community Center Fund (see Attachments D-1, D-2 and D-3), revenues collected through March totaled $5.0 million, or 77.2% of the budget amount of $6.5 million. Year-to-date expenditures through March totaled $4.8 million, or 73.7% of the budget amount of $6.5 million. BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: GENERAL FUND Attachment A shows General Fund revenues and expenditures through March, as well as year-end estimates for each category. The estimated year-end projections in the General Fund are as follows: Revenues $37,357,236 Less: Expenditures ($36,062,647) Less: Council-Approved Use of Contingency: - Regional Municipalities Veteran's Treatment Court ($75,000) Approved July 5, 2017 Estimated Increase in Fund Balance $1,219,589 General Fund Revenues Local sales tax collections in the General Fund total $14.1 million, or 82.2% of the budget amount of $17.2 million. These revenues are expected to come in over budget by about $1.1 million, or 6.4%, due primarily to construction and utility sales tax collections. Please see Attachment F for a monthly tracking of General Fund local sales tax collections, including construction and utility sales tax. License and permit revenues total $2.1 million, or 101.0% of the budget amount of $2.1 million. These revenues are expected to come in over budget by about $436,000, or 21.1%, based on current trends and updated forecasts for residential and commercial building activity through the remainder of the fiscal year. State shared revenues total $8.7 million, or 74.6% of the budget amount of $11.6 million. These revenues are estimated to come in slightly under budget, by about $96,000, or 0.8%, due to state-shared income and vehicle license taxes. Charges for services revenues total $1.6 million, or 70.5% of the budget amount of $2.2 million. These revenues are projected to come in under budget by about $67,000, or 3.1%, based on department projections and trends through year-end. Interest income revenues reflect a loss of about $44,000 through March. Rising interest rates have caused increased volatility in the Town's investment portfolio. While this may cause temporary fluctuation as market values decline due to rising yields (market values move inversely to the direction of interest rates), this volatility tends to average out over longer periods of time as funds are invested at higher yields. State grant revenues are estimated to come in under budget by about $121,000, or 51.4%. This is due to grant capacity that will not be utilized, and is offset with corresponding reductions in budgeted grant expenditures. Federal grant revenues are estimated to come in under budget by about $43,000, or 9.2%, based on actual and projected proceeds through year-end. Other intergovernmental revenues are estimated to come in under budget by about $146,000, or 8.1%. Of this amount, $50,000 was capacity for a potential school resource officer at Leman Academy that will not be utilized. The remainder is due primarily to projected transit reimbursements from the Regional Transportation Authority (RTA). Overall, total General Fund revenues are estimated to come in over budget by approximately $1,022,000, or 2.8% at year-end. Please note all figures are subject to change. General Fund Expenditures General Fund expenditures are projected to come in under budget by about $663,000, or 1.8%. This is due to estimated personnel savings, capital savings for grant capacity that will not be utilized, and a budgeted transfer of $275,000 to the Highway Fund, which will not be necessary this fiscal year. Please note all figures are subject to change. HIGHWAY FUND Highway Fund Revenues State shared highway user funds total $2.4 million or 71.8% of the budget amount of $3.4 million. These revenues are estimated to come in on budget at this time. As noted in the General Fund expenditure discussion above, the $275,000 budgeted transfer to the Highway Fund will not be necessary this fiscal year. State grant revenues are estimated to come in slightly over budget by about $20,000 or 19.5%, due to estimated reimbursements for contract administration of Pima Association of Governments and RTA-funded roadway widening projects. Interest income revenues are estimated to come in under budget by about $10,500 or 28.3%. Please reference the discussion on interest income revenues in the General Fund notes above. License and permit revenues total $35,752 or 62.7% of the budget amount of $57,000. These revenues are estimated to come in under budget by about $12,000 or 21.1%, based on trending actual collections through year-end. through year-end. Please note that all year-end estimates are subject to change. Highway Fund Expenditures Expenditures are projected to come in under budget by about $850,000, or 17.2%. Of this amount, nearly $570,000 is pavement preservation savings due to the new Pima County property tax for roads, which will cover the Town's residential spring surface treatments. The year-end expenditure estimate also assumes a rollover of the $250,000 Safeway/1st Ave Safety CIP project into FY 18/19. The remaining $30,000 is attributable to estimated personnel savings. Please note all figures are subject to change. BED TAX FUND Bed Tax Fund Revenues Bed tax revenues total $1.1 million, or 101.1% of the budget amount of $1.1 million. These revenues are estimated to come in over budget by about $153,000 or 13.6%, based on current trends. Interest income revenues reflect a loss of about $400 through March, and are estimated to come in under budget by about $6,300 or 79.1%. Please reference the discussion on interest income revenues in the General Fund notes above. Please note all year-end estimates are subject to change. Bed Tax Fund Expenditures Expenditures are estimated to come in over budget by about $6,300 or 0.5%. This is due to tennis court improvements at the Community Center, which are partially offset with expected operations & maintenance savings in the fund. Please note this overage is more than offset by projected bed tax revenues, as noted above. COMMUNITY CENTER FUND Attachment D-1 shows the consolidated financial status of the Community Center Fund with all revenues and expenditures from Troon and Town-managed operations. Attachment D-2 shows the monthly line item detail for the Troon-managed operations, specifically revenues and expenditures associated with the golf, tennis, and food and beverage operations. The totals in the revenue and expenditure categories in Attachment D-2 tie to the Contracted Operating Revenues and Expenditures in Attachment D-1. Attachment D-3 shows the revenues and expenditures for the Troon-managed food and beverage operations only. Community Center Fund Revenues Local sales tax revenues from the dedicated half-cent sales tax total $1.7 million or 74.3% of the budget amount of $2.3 million. These revenues are estimated to come in on budget at this time. Contracted operating revenues from Troon total $2.6 million, or 77.3% of the budget amount of $3.4 million. These revenues are estimated to come in over budget by about $73,000, or 2.2%, based on Troon's forecast through the remainder of the fiscal year. Town operating revenues total $665,877 or 85.6% of the budget amount of $777,580. These revenues are estimated to come in over budget by about $127,000 or 16.4%, due primarily to classic membership dues, facility rental income and swim team revenues. Community Center Fund Expenditures Contracted operating expenditures from Troon total $4.0 million or 77.0% of the budget amount of $5.2 million. These expenditures are estimated to come in over budget by about $119,000 or 2.3%, due to increased water costs as a result of warm, dry weather. Town operating expenditures total $752,749 or 73.1% of the budget amount of $1.0 million. These expenditures are projected to come in over budget by about $36,000 or 3.5%, due to estimated personnel costs to meet the programming needs of the facility. Staff is closely monitoring these expenditures, and has adjusted future budget capacity accordingly. Please note this overage is more than offset by our projected overage in operating revenues, as noted above. Capital outlay totals $29,464, due to cart path improvements. Capital expenditures are projected to come in on budget at this time. Year-end expenditure estimates include the annual loan repayment of $120,000 to the General Fund. Please see Attachments A, B, and C for additional details on the General Fund, Highway Fund and Bed Tax Fund. See Attachments D-1, D-2 and D-3 for additional details on the Community Center Fund. See Attachment E for a fiscal year-to-date consolidated summary of all Town Funds. See Attachment F for a breakdown of monthly local sales tax collections for the General Fund. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A SUGGESTED MOTION: This item is for information only. Attachments Attachment A - General Fund Attachment B - Highway Fund Attachment C - Bed Tax Fund Attachment D-1 Community Center Fund Attachment D-2 Troon Cash Flow Attachment D-3 Troon F&B Attachment E - Summary All Funds Attachment F - Gen Fund Local Sales Tax ATTACHMENT A March YTD Financial Status General Fund % Budget Completion through March --- 75% % Actuals YE % Variance to Budget to Budget REVENUES: LOCAL SALES TAX 14,102,306 17,164,573 82.2% 18,266,587 6.4% LICENSES & PERMITS 2,084,133 2,063,121 101.0% 2,499,267 21.1% FEDERAL GRANTS 304,492 471,342 64.6% 428,126 -9.2% STATE GRANTS 78,166 234,760 33.3% 114,200 -51.4% STATE/COUNTY SHARED 8,683,298 11,636,928 74.6% 11,540,562 -0.8% OTHER INTERGOVERNMENTAL 1,134,690 1,793,360 63.3% 1,647,331 -8.1% CHARGES FOR SERVICES 1,558,318 2,210,453 70.5% 2,143,030 -3.1% FINES 95,056 120,000 79.2% 120,000 0.0% INTEREST INCOME (43,894) 103,000 -42.6% (11,722) -111.4% MISCELLANEOUS 184,679 233,000 79.3% 304,855 30.8% TRANSFERS IN - 305,000 0.0%305,000 0.0% TOTAL REVENUES 28,181,244 36,335,537 77.6% 37,357,236 2.8% % Actuals YE % Variance to Budget to Budget EXPENDITURES: COUNCIL 152,655 214,759 71.1% 214,759 0.0% CLERK 370,616 485,098 76.4% 485,098 0.0% MANAGER 578,500 844,708 68.5% 828,524 -1.9% HUMAN RESOURCES 241,033 375,790 64.1% 375,790 0.0% FINANCE 544,696 810,006 67.2% 791,119 -2.3% INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 1,490,507 2,189,939 68.1% 2,176,693 -0.6% GENERAL ADMINISTRATION 1,264,466 1,682,216 75.2% 1,702,216 1.2% LEGAL 512,167 779,670 65.7% 749,302 -3.9% COURT 635,532 874,282 72.7% 874,282 0.0% COMM. DEV. & PUBLIC WORKS 3,242,604 4,893,469 66.3% 4,818,179 -1.5% PARKS & RECREATION 2,283,770 3,667,092 62.3% 3,545,104 -3.3% POLICE 11,743,234 17,108,674 68.6% 16,976,913 -0.8% TRANSFERS OUT 2,521,668 2,799,668 90.1%2,524,668 -9.8% TOTAL EXPENDITURES 25,581,448 36,725,371 69.7% 36,062,647 -1.8% SURPLUS / (DEFICIT) 2,599,796 (389,834) 1,294,589 BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 13,403,214 Plus: Surplus / (Deficit)1,294,589 Less: Approved Use of Contingency Reserves During FY 17/18: Regional Municipalities Veteran's Treatment Court (75,000) ENDING FUND BALANCE **14,622,803 * Year-end estimates are subject to further revision ** Ending fund balance amounts are estimates and are subject to further revision FY 2017/2018 Year End Estimate * Budget Year End Estimate * Actuals thru 3/2018 Actuals thru 3/2018 Budget F:\BUDGET ANALYST\Financial Reports 2017-2018\3Q\Mar\Mar FY 18 Monthly Report 4/30/2018 ATTACHMENT B March YTD Financial Status FY 2017/2018 % Budget Completion through March --- 75% Actuals thru 3/2018 Budget % Actuals to Budget Year End Estimate * YE % Variance to BudgetREVENUES: LICENSES & PERMITS 35,752 57,000 62.7% 44,948 -21.1% STATE GRANTS 87,400 100,000 87.4% 119,514 19.5% STATE/COUNTY SHARED 2,415,266 3,363,581 71.8% 3,363,581 0.0% INTEREST INCOME 15,555 36,994 42.0% 26,524 -28.3% MISCELLANEOUS 10,616 2,000 530.8% 10,934 446.7% TRANSFERS IN - 275,000 0.0%- -100.0% TOTAL REVENUES 2,564,588 3,834,575 66.9% 3,565,501 -7.0% Actuals thru 3/2018 Budget % Actuals to Budget Year End Estimate * YE % Variance to Budget EXPENDITURES: ADMINISTRATION 534,571 741,063 72.1% 741,063 0.0% TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING 588,158 661,582 88.9% 839,699 26.9% PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT 618,282 1,638,078 37.7% 1,036,707 -36.7% STREET MAINTENANCE 747,709 1,064,607 70.2% 1,034,028 -2.9% TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 243,658 844,547 28.9%448,038 -46.9% TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,732,378 4,949,877 55.2% 4,099,535 -17.2% SURPLUS / (DEFICIT) (167,790) (1,115,302) (534,034) BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 1,350,903 Plus: Surplus / (Deficit)(534,034) ENDING FUND BALANCE **816,869 * Year-end estimates are subject to further revision ** Ending fund balance amounts are estimates and are subject to further revision Highway Fund F:\BUDGET ANALYST\Financial Reports 2017-2018\3Q\Mar\Mar FY 18 Monthly Report 4/30/2018 ATTACHMENT C March YTD Financial Status % Budget Completion through March --- 75% % Actuals YE % Variance to Budget to Budget REVENUES: BED TAXES 1,138,834 1,126,955 101.1% 1,279,940 13.6% INTEREST INCOME (408) 8,011 -5.1%1,678 -79.1% TOTAL REVENUES 1,138,426 1,134,966 100.3% 1,281,618 12.9% % Actuals YE % Variance to Budget to Budget EXPENDITURES: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 538,219 844,158 63.8% 850,481 0.7% TRANSFERS OUT 225,019 410,019 54.9%410,019 0.0% TOTAL EXPENDITURES 763,238 1,254,177 60.9% 1,260,500 0.5% SURPLUS / (DEFICIT) 375,188 (119,211) 21,118 BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 462,611 Plus: Surplus / (Deficit)21,118 Less: Approved Use of Contingency Reserves During FY 17/18: Tohono Chul Park Financial Participation Agreement (250,000) ENDING FUND BALANCE **233,729 * Year-end estimates are subject to further revision ** Ending fund balance amounts are estimates and are subject to further revision FY 2017/2018 Year End Estimate * Budget Year End Estimate * Bed Tax Fund Budget Actuals thru 3/2018 Actuals thru 3/2018 F:\BUDGET ANALYST\Financial Reports 2017-2018\3Q\Mar\Mar FY 18 Monthly Report 4/30/2018 ATTACHMENT D-1 March YTD Financial Status % Budget Completion through March --- 75% % Actuals YE % Variance to Budget to Budget REVENUES: CONTRACTED OPERATING REVENUES Golf Revenues 988,159 1,038,825 95.1% 1,272,568 22.5% Member Dues (Golf) 613,196 959,009 63.9% 811,811 -15.3% Tennis Revenues 275,206 345,900 79.6% 361,006 4.4% Food & Beverage 574,697 793,887 72.4% 782,982 -1.4% Merchandise & Other 163,685 244,730 66.9%226,847 -7.3% 2,614,943 3,382,351 77.3% 3,455,214 2.2% TOWN OPERATING REVENUES Daily Drop-Ins 24,757 23,000 107.6% 28,100 22.2% Member Dues 544,806 614,000 88.7% 700,000 14.0% Recreation Programs 57,540 134,000 42.9% 127,500 -4.9% Swim Team/Swim Lessons 10,388 1,500 692.5% 12,000 700.0% Facility Rental Income 28,166 4,580 615.0% 37,000 707.9% Concession Sales 221 500 44.2%250 -50.0% 665,877 777,580 85.6% 904,850 16.4% OTHER REVENUES Local Sales Tax 1,713,909 2,308,112 74.3% 2,308,112 0.0% Real Property Rental Income 19,502 27,861 70.0%19,502 -30.0% 1,733,411 2,335,973 74.2% 2,327,614 -0.4% TOTAL REVENUES 5,014,231 6,495,904 77.2% 6,687,678 3.0% % Actuals YE % Variance to Budget to Budget EXPENDITURES: CONTRACTED OPERATING EXPENDITURES Personnel 1,603,032 2,121,525 75.6% 2,135,951 0.7% Operations & Maintenance 2,107,343 2,712,454 77.7% 2,820,057 4.0% Equipment Leases 296,223 371,313 79.8%368,716 -0.7% 4,006,598 5,205,292 77.0% 5,324,724 2.3% TOWN OPERATING EXPENDITURES Personnel 545,197 745,858 73.1% 781,683 4.8% Operations & Maintenance 207,553 284,548 72.9%284,548 0.0% 752,749 1,030,406 73.1% 1,066,231 3.5% CAPITAL OUTLAY 29,464 94,250 31.3% 94,250 0.0% TRANSFERS OUT - 165,956 0.0% 165,956 0.0% TOTAL EXPENDITURES 4,788,811 6,495,904 73.7% 6,651,161 2.4% SURPLUS / (DEFICIT) 225,421 - 36,518 BEGINNING FUND BALANCE (97,157) Plus: Surplus / (Deficit)36,518 ENDING FUND BALANCE **(60,639) * Year-end estimates are subject to further revision ** Ending fund balance amounts are estimates and are subject to further revision FY 2017/2018 Actuals thru 3/2018 Budget Year End Estimate * Community Center Fund Actuals thru 3/2018 Budget Year End Estimate * F:\BUDGET ANALYST\Financial Reports 2017-2018\3Q\Mar\Mar FY 18 Monthly Report 4/30/2018 ATTACHMENT D-2TROONEl Conquistador Cash Flow StatementActualActualActualActualActualActualActualActualActualActual Original Budget ForecastJul-17Aug-17 Sep-17 Oct-17 Nov-17 Dec-17 Jan-18 Feb-18 Mar-18TotalTOTALTOTALRevenues:Golf Fees, net of discounts20,933 29,780 50,962 67,564 80,238 57,727 111,925 144,337 182,283 745,749 780,706 967,514 Trail Fees & Member Cart Fees19,317 17,660 17,589 18,586 19,200 18,597 19,020 18,737 18,816 167,522 205,664 219,421 Golf - Group Services- 126 840 64 - - - 701 818 2,549 1,760 3,259 Range, Rentals, Other Golf related2,794 2,897 8,412 6,485 7,273 6,429 7,238 7,962 9,046 58,536 40,930 67,336 Golf Lessons 405 285 590 790 585 1,103 600 890 910 6,158 5,205 6,893 Income - Golf Schools 2,400 - - 955 540 270 1,500 735 1,245 7,645 4,560 8,145 Total Member Dues 58,678 60,153 59,790 71,812 73,398 69,778 71,938 73,810 73,839 613,196 959,009 811,811 Other Member Income 312 177 (247) 684 (202) (57) 102 273 64 1,106 - 1,106 Swim/Tennis Revenues 25,228 14,808 35,800 51,936 27,259 31,159 30,082 24,590 34,344 275,206 345,900 361,006 Income - Other (non - golf) 11 75 - 77 44 2,005 797 81 1,168 4,258 - 4,470 Merchandise, net of discounts 10,460 14,083 12,881 11,512 28,049 30,177 11,351 16,543 23,265 158,321 244,730 221,271 Food and Beverage, net of discounts 47,336 49,103 64,613 65,869 64,944 63,341 51,825 74,598 93,068 574,697 793,887 782,982 Total Revenues 187,874 189,147 251,230 296,334 301,328 280,529 306,378 363,257 438,866 2,614,943 3,382,351 3,455,214 Cost of Sales:COS - Group Services Golf 17 125 823 64 - - - 492 818 2,339 1,760 3,049 COS - Golf Lessons 324 333 475 616 468 985 480 712 728 5,121 3,644 5,636 COS - Golf Schools 1,666 - - 669 378 - 578 711 696 4,698 3,648 5,098 COS - Service Commissions 15,523 12,325 17,775 19,043 20,326 19,594 19,775 18,415 20,555 163,331 176,330 208,691 COS - Merchandise, net of discounts 7,715 5,567 6,438 8,362 17,475 22,113 7,309 11,743 14,917 101,639 158,234 142,858 COS - Other (non - golf) (1,572) - - - - - - - - (1,572) - (1,572) COS - Food & Beverage 17,099 19,701 25,927 26,631 22,402 23,759 20,881 27,107 32,623 216,130 282,045 290,333 Total Cost of Sales 40,772 38,051 51,438 55,385 61,049 66,451 49,023 59,180 70,337 491,686 625,660 654,093 Gross Profit 147,102 151,096 199,792 240,949 240,279 214,078 257,355 304,077 368,529 2,123,257 2,756,691 2,801,121 Operating Expenses:Payroll 130,038 137,301 138,716 139,445 140,414 131,203 151,515 140,484 163,576 1,272,692 1,684,714 1,696,506 Employee Benefits 30,933 31,745 32,122 30,539 31,567 31,663 42,085 37,625 39,097 307,376 409,777 411,852 Employee Related 3,367 2,502 2,281 2,323 2,461 2,661 2,283 2,310 2,776 22,964 27,034 27,593 Advertising & Marketing 5,429 5,790 4,366 22,212 14,534 11,801 10,991 12,423 12,029 99,575 69,983 115,639 Repair & Maintenance 30,650 29,992 80,297 71,059 16,233 23,352 18,446 12,208 26,253 308,490 423,482 382,644 Operating Expenses 17,312 17,012 19,341 20,508 23,507 19,984 17,120 23,843 23,279 181,906 258,196 242,245 Total Operating Expenses 217,729 224,342 277,123 286,086 228,716 220,664 242,440 228,893 267,010 2,193,003 2,873,186 2,876,479 Operating Profit (70,627) (73,246) (77,331) (45,137) 11,563 (6,586) 14,915 75,184 101,519 (69,746) (116,495) (75,358) Leases - Carts 9,282 9,282 9,282 9,282 9,282 9,282 14,874 18,259 14,169 102,992 119,745 117,148 Leases - Equipment 23,029 23,780 20,580 22,670 19,277 20,974 22,670 19,277 20,974 193,231 251,568 251,568 Utilities 127,430 120,728 147,704 181,357 88,249 65,763 43,103 59,263 76,824 910,421 1,190,026 1,273,888 Fixed Operating Expenses 159,741 153,790 177,566 213,309 116,807 96,018 80,648 96,799 111,966 1,206,644 1,561,339 1,642,604 Gross Operating Profit (230,368) (227,036) (254,897) (258,446) (105,244) (102,604) (65,733) (21,615) (10,447) (1,276,390) (1,677,834) (1,717,962) Insurance 97 97 97 97 97 97 98 98 98 876 1,107 1,158 Fees, Permits & Licenses 335 (5) 160 - 150 - - 100 740 740 Base Management Fees 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 108,000 144,000 144,000 Bad Debt 337 5,048 250 (313) 646 (81) (81) (157) 5,649 5,649 Total Other Expenses 12,097 12,769 17,140 12,507 11,784 12,893 12,017 12,017 12,041 115,265 145,107 151,547 Net Operating Income (Loss) (242,465) (239,805) (272,037) (270,953) (117,028) (115,497) (77,750) (33,632) (22,488) (1,391,655) (1,822,941) (1,869,509) 4/30/2018 ATTACHMENT D-3 ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET MONTH MONTH Y-T-D Y-T-D FOOD & BEVERAGE REVENUE 93,068 84,900 574,698 585,603 TOTAL REVENUES 93,068 84,900 574,698 585,603 COST OF SALES 32,623 29,200 216,130 207,842 PAYROLL & BENEFITS 46,240 46,369 364,111 383,482 OPERATING EXPENSES 8,684 6,750 71,581 60,600 NET INCOME (LOSS) 5,521 2,581 (77,124) (66,321) EL CONQUISTADOR INCOME STATEMENT CONSOLIDATED - RESTAURANT/GRILLE - MARCH 2018 4/30/2018 ATTACHMENT EConsolidated Year-to-Date Financial Report through March, 2018FY 2017/2018FY 17/18 Capital Leases/Left in AccountsBegin Bal. Transfer OutThru Mar 2018General Fund - Unassigned 11,961,352 28,181,244 28,181,244 2,521,668 17,441,047 5,354,614 264,119 25,581,448 14,561,148 General Fund - Assigned 1,441,862 - 1,441,862 Highway Fund - Committed 1,350,903 2,564,588 2,564,588 1,454,541 657,426 620,411 2,732,378 1,183,113 Seizure & Forfeiture - Justice/State 303,081 162,422 162,422 36,321 96,235 57,867 190,423 275,080 Bed Tax Fund - Committed 462,611 1,138,426 1,138,426 225,019 193,145 248,751 96,323 763,238 837,799 Impound Fee Fund 25,318 25,800 25,800 42,256 42,256 8,862 Community Center Fund (97,157) 5,014,231 5,014,231 296,223 545,197 3,917,928 29,464 4,788,811 128,262 Municipal Debt Service Fund 89,327 110,417 637,827 748,244 6,800 824,460 831,260 6,311 Oracle Road Debt Service Fund 6,737 164,413 164,413 1,800 164,851 166,651 4,499 Alternative Water Resources Dev Impact Fee Fund 6,472,074 1,252,431 1,252,431 95,625 95,625 7,628,880 Potable Water System Dev Impact Fee Fund 5,558,044 597,647 597,647 15,593 294,136 309,729 5,845,962 Townwide Roadway Development Impact Fee Fund 3,097,156 679,701 679,701 866,297 866,297 2,910,560 Parks & Recreation Impact Fee Fund 514,986 203,414 203,414 539,400 539,400 179,000 Police Impact Fee Fund 505,282 113,530 113,530 - 618,812 General Government Impact Fee Fund 3,524 22 22 - 3,546 General Government CIP Fund 1,716,361 2,351,107 2,351,107 62,244 560 1,714,888 1,777,693 2,289,775 PAG/RTA Fund 884,762 2,981,167 2,981,167 122,189 3,352,579 3,474,768 391,161 Water Utility10,024,473 12,644,479 12,644,479 2,847 2,237,129 5,150,845 1,693,930 3,570,926 12,655,676 10,013,275 Stormwater Utility603,121 1,040,489 1,040,489 442,779 199,944 171,099 813,822 829,788 Fleet Fund 952,371 951,682 300,000 1,251,682 65,153 497,210 518,333 1,080,695 1,123,358 Benefit Self Insurance Fund (113,357) 2,628,220 2,628,220 1,686,859 1,686,859 828,004 Recreation In-Lieu Fee Fund 15,718 - - 15,718 Energy Efficiency Project Fund 568,337 - 525,797 525,797 42,540 Total 46,346,886 60,454,323 3,288,934 63,743,257 3,585,157 22,642,000 17,930,190 9,911,107 - 4,854,374 58,922,827 51,167,315 Fund RevenueOther Fin Sources/TfrsTotal InDebt Service Total OutPersonnel O&M Capital ContingencyF:\BUDGET ANALYST\Financial Reports 2017-2018\3Q\Mar\Attachment E - Summary All Funds4/30/2018 ATTACHMENT FGeneral Fund Local Sales Tax CollectionsFY 2017/18CATEGORYJULYAUGSEPOCTNOVDECJANFEBMARAPRMAYJUNETOTALConstruction Sales Tax 547,514 469,050 456,125 443,115 664,593 459,268 439,368 384,045 282,895 4,145,973 Utility Sales Tax 202,208 429,402 290,283 310,764 256,734 231,300 227,032 242,373 218,602 2,408,698 Retail Sales Tax 541,876 478,942 481,677 505,094 502,326 629,823 801,494 557,783 521,796 5,020,811 All Other Local Sales Tax *202,678 219,584 186,445 184,144 200,359 198,807 210,620 267,704 257,943 1,928,284 TOTAL 1,494,276$ 1,596,978$ 1,414,530$ 1,443,117$ 1,624,012$ 1,519,198$ 1,678,514$ 1,451,905$ 1,281,236$ 13,503,766$ FY 2016/17CATEGORYJULYAUGSEPOCTNOVDECJANFEBMARAPRMAYJUNETOTALConstruction Sales Tax 211,862 188,622 464,738 331,337 302,776 310,738 553,592 307,122 457,822 400,603 660,930 602,001 4,792,143 Utility Sales Tax 256,758 319,698 294,983 273,535 216,045 210,750 210,159 235,740 210,303 197,163 205,177 221,911 2,852,222 Retail Sales Tax 498,390 460,006 467,191 491,196 495,453 598,150 774,898 489,541 512,147 544,825 565,002 542,081 6,438,880 All Other Local Sales Tax *171,723 170,598 181,484 157,224 196,370 185,762 203,062 196,780 236,388 188,520 220,840 195,229 2,303,981 TOTAL 1,138,733$ 1,138,924$ 1,408,396$ 1,253,292$ 1,210,644$ 1,305,400$ 1,741,712$ 1,229,183$ 1,416,660$ 1,331,110$ 1,651,949$ 1,561,222$ 16,387,225$ * Note: Does not include cable franchise fees or sales tax audit revenuesF:\BUDGET ANALYST\Financial Reports 2017-2018\3Q\Mar\Attachment F - Gen Fund Local Sales Tax4/30/2018 Town Council Regular Session C. Meeting Date:05/16/2018 Requested by: Mike Standish Submitted By:Michelle Stine, Town Clerk's Office Department:Town Clerk's Office Information SUBJECT: Appointments to the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) RECOMMENDATION: HPC has two vacancies. The HPC selection committee has recommended the following appointments: Gail Munden Louis Hiett EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The selection committee has conducted interviews to fill two (2) vacancies on the HPC. Vice Chair Walter Ohlson, and Recreation & Cultural Services manager Lynanne Dellerman - Silverthorn were the members of the selection committee. Ms. Munden and Mr. Hiett are recommended for the vacant seats, and their applications are attached for review. Please note, these are partial terms that will not count against their term limits. BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: The HPC was formed to promote the educational, cultural and economic welfare of Oro Valley by ensuring the preservation of historic buildings, districts, landmarks, structures, documents, photographs and other artifacts that represent the historic background and development of the greater Oro Valley ares. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to (approve or deny) the appointments of Gail Munden and Louis Hiett to the Historic Preservation Commission for terms expiring December 31, 2018. Attachments Gail Munden - Application Louis Hiett - Application Town Council Regular Session D. Meeting Date:05/16/2018 Requested by: Tobin Sidles Submitted By:Mike Standish, Town Clerk's Office Department:Legal Information SUBJECT: Resolution No. (R)18-18, authorizing "The First Amendment to Communications Site Lease Agreement" ("Amendment") to clean up the Lease and reduce the price and lease escalation rate RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On May 2, 2012, the Town approved Resolution No. (R)12-21, approving the Communications Site Lease Agreement between the Town of Oro Valley and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC. Over time, the rental rate has escalated at a rate beyond what the parties anticipated, opening the door to the possibility that the wireless facility would be removed and relocated to another location. The parties reviewed options and developed acceptable changes to the lease to continue its current location and the revenues that the Town receives. BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: The attached proposed reduction in rate and lease amount is a reasonable compromise that will allow the Town to continue to receive revenues, limit any disruption in other areas of the community, all while keeping the lease amount at a level acceptable to Cingular. Attachment 1 reflects how the new lease structure will work over time. FISCAL IMPACT: Initially, there will be a reduction in lease rents from approximately $2,800 per month to $2,500 per month. However, over time, the new escalation clause will have the rents at $2,750 in year 6 and at $3,025 in year 11. Total revenue received starting next fiscal year is $30,000. SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to (approve/deny) Resolution No. (R)18-18, authorizing the Amendment to the existing Cingulair telecommunications facility and associated Memorandum of Lease. Attachments (R)18-18 Site Lease Amandment Memorandum First Amendment to Lease Lease Optimization Term Sheet Town of Oro Valley Attorney’s Office/ca/040312 RESOLUTION NO. (R)18-18 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE COMMUNICATIONS SITE LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY AND NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC FOR A COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY AND THE MEMORANDUM OF FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE LEASE WHEREAS, on May 5, 2010, the Town approved Resolution No. (R) 10-24, approving an Intergovernmental Agreement for joint use of facility space between the Town and Pima County; and WHEREAS, on May 2, 2012, the Town approved Resolution No. (R) 12-21, approving the Communications Site Lease Agreement between the Town of Oro Valley and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC; and WHEREAS, the First Amendment to the Communications Site Lease Agreement is necessary to modify the rent to a lower amount and to extend the term of the lease; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the health, safety and well being of the residents of the Town of Oro Valley to authorize and approve the First Amendment to the Communications Site Lease Agreement with Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, that: SECTION 1. The First Amendment to the Communications Site Lease Agreement between the Town of Oro Valley and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference, to modify the rent and extend the term of the lease is hereby approved. SECTION 2. The Memorandum of First Amendment to the Lease, attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and incorporated herein by this reference is hereby approved. SECTION 3. The Mayor and Council of the Town Oro Valley are hereby authorized to take such steps as are necessary to execute and implement the terms of the First Amendment to the Communications Site Lease Agreement. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, this 16 th day of May, 2018. Town of Oro Valley Attorney’s Office/ca/040312 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Dr. Satish I. Hiremath, Mayor ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM : Michael Standish, Town Clerk Tobin Sidles, Legal Services Director Date: Date: Town of Oro Valley Attorney’s Office/ca/040312 EXHIBIT “A” Town Council Regular Session 1. Meeting Date:05/16/2018 Requested by: Bayer Vella, Community and Economic Development Submitted By:Michael Spaeth, Community and Economic Development Case Number:OV1601793 Information SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING ORDINANCE NO. (O)18-07, REZONING FROM R1-144 TO PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT FOR APPROXIMATELY 199-ACRES LOCATED WEST OF LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD BETWEEN LAMBERT LANE AND NARANJA DRIVE AND 8.2-ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD AND NARANJA DRIVE RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval, subject to the conditions listed in Attachment 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The purpose of this request is to consider a proposed rezoning application (Attachment 2) from R1-144 (large lot residential) to Planned Area Development (PAD) for the following adjacent properties: 199-acres located west of La Cholla Boulevard between Lambert Lane and Naranja Drive 8.2-acres located on the northwest corner of La Cholla Boulevard and Naranja Drive This is a comprehensively planned project on approximately 207-acres (Attachment 3), which includes residential, commercial, recreation, quasi-public (Church expansion), and open space. Approximately 74 acres will be conserved as Environmental Sensitive Lands open space which is 36% of the entire site. A General Plan Amendment was approved for the site in 2015 which is the foundation for the applicant's proposal. The extent of outreach and public participation was well beyond code requirements and resulted in a Long Range Conceptual Master Plan (Attachment 4) and numerous Special Area Policies (Attachment 5). Both include more design detail than any other General Plan amendment to date. As a result, design oriented policies/mapping (location of recreation areas, access, building heights etc.) were directly inserted into the rezoning Tentative Development Plan. The proposed rezoning aligns with the General Plan Long Range Conceptual Master Plan and all of the Special Area Policies. The applicant's proposal is unique in that it includes multiple "Tentative Development Plan Concepts" (Attachment 6) and specific customized zoning requirements ("modifications") which ensure comprehensive planning and future market flexibility requested by the property owner. All individual concepts are in conformance with Zoning Code requirements. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered the applicant's proposal at two public hearings, March 6, 2018 and April 3, 2018. The Commission has provided a recommendation of approval, subject to the conditions included in Attachment 1. BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: A. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND CONTEXT Land Use Context The General Plan land use designation for the property is Master Planned Community (MPC). This designation represents areas where comprehensively planned developments are intended. As stated previously, this project was the subject of an extensive public input process during the preceding General Plan Amendment which resulted in the Long Range Conceptual Master Plan (Attachment 4) and Special Area Policies (Attachment 5). The existing zoning for the property is R1-144 which accommodates large-lot detached single-family residential development. The land use designation and zoning for the property and the surrounding area is provided in Attachment 7. Site Conditions 207 acres Property is vacant, except the existing solar field on Parcel K and the site surrounds the existing Casas Adobes Baptist Church Characterized by significant wash corridors Previous Approvals 2002: The property was annexed into the Town of Oro Valley 2015: A Major General Plan Amendment was approved by Town Council which established the Master Planned Community designation and the Special Area Policies B. APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL The request is to rezone the property from R1-144 (large lot residential) to Planned Area Development (PAD). The purpose of a PAD zoning district is to "...foster development which is superior to that which may occur under conventional zoning regulations...". As such, the applicant's proposal is to establish the approximately 207-acre property as comprehensively designed project known as the Capella PAD. The request includes a number of underlying zoning designations which are summarized in the table below: It is important to note the underlying zoning designations are consistent with the Long Range Conceptual Master Plan (Attachment 4) established as part of the previous General Plan Amendment process. In addition, the proposal also includes the necessary infrastructure (roads, sewer and trails) improvements required for future development. The applicant's proposal establishes criteria, similar to existing language in the Zoning Code, for when a future Proposed Use(s) by Parcel PARCEL PROPOSED LAND USE(S) Parcel A Neighborhood Commercial/Office (C-N) or Medium Density Single-family Residential Parcel B Community Commercial (C-1) or Medium Density Single-family Residential Parcel C Recreation Parcel D High Density Residential Parcel E High Density Residential or Church Expansion Parcel F Recreation Parcel G Recreation Parcel H Medium Density Single-family Residential Parcel J Community Commercial (C-1) Parcel K Low Density Single-family Residential Parcel L Low Density Single-family Residential or Church Expansion Parcel M Low Density Single-family Residential site plan can proceed directly to Final Design Review, when it must follow the Conceptual Design Review process and when an amendment to the Planned Area Development would be required. Staff is supportive of the proposed criteria as it is similar to existing Zoning Code language. For more information see page 179 of Attachment 2. C. GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE ANALYSIS Rezoning applications are reviewed for conformance with the Your Voice, Our Future General Plan Land Use Map, Vision, Guiding Principles, Goals and Policies. The subject property is designated Master Planned Community (MPC) which is defined as: "Areas where large developments with a mix of uses is planned and developed in a comprehensive manner with a unified design theme. Developments in this land use designation generally provide a range of uses including a variety of housing options, shopping and employment opportunities and recreational amenities with a safe and efficient network for automobiles, bicycles and pedestrians." The rezoning request is consistent with the Master Planned Community land use designation as it incorporates a comprehensively planned design for the entire 207-acres including cohesive parcel layouts, recreation areas, open space and safe, convenient connectivity for both motorized and non-motorized travel. Additional detail is provided in Attachment 8. The General Plan vision: "Oro Valley strives to be a well-managed community that provides all residents with opportunities for quality living. Oro Valley will keep its friendly, small-town, neighborly character, while increasing services, employment and recreation. The Town's lifestyle continues to be defined by a strong sense of community, a high regard for public safety and an extraordinary natural environment and scenic views" The proposed rezoning is consistent with the General Plan Vision as the request establishes a complimentary mix of zoning designations to provide a complete community within this area, including residential, commercial, office and recreational opportunities. Furthermore, in adhering to the Special Area Policies previously established, the design takes into account the need for open space preservation and protection of scenic views. The General Plan also includes Guiding Principles, Goals and Policies which inform policy and development decisions within the Town. In sum, the proposed rezoning does conform with the intent of the Principles, Goals and Policies. Additional detail is provided in Attachment 8. Long Range Conceptual Master Plan The Long Range Conceptual Master Plan (Attachment 4) developed as part of the preceding General Plan Amendment process established the future locations of all the underlying zoning districts. The applicant's proposal is consistent with this plan and mirrors the Conceptual Plan previously approved. Special Area Policies The Special Area Policies (Attachment 5) developed during the previous General Plan Amendment process serve as the foundation for this rezoning proposal. The proposal is consistent with the Special Area Policies which range from establishing a maximum number of homes to limiting uses and development standards on several parcels. A more detailed analysis of the proposals conformance with the General Plan Land Special Area Policies is provided in Attachment 8. General Plan Criteria in the Zoning Code The Zoning Code also emphasizes conformance with the General Plan for all new Planned Area Developments (PAD). All new PAD's are required to be in conformance with at least 80% of the applicable General Plan criteria from the following elements: Land Use Transportation Economic Development Public Services and Facilities Community Design Open Space/Recreation Natural Resources Conservation Safety Cultural/Historic The applicant's proposal is consistent with this requirement. D. ZONING CODE CONFORMANCE ANALYSIS The applicant's proposal was reviewed for conformance with the Town's Zoning Code, including the specific criteria for new Planned Area Developments (PAD). New Planned Area Development criteria In addition to General Plan conformance, the Zoning Code establishes specific criteria for all new Planned Area Development (PAD) proposals. This criteria includes conformance with required and specific findings and permissible zoning code modifications. Details regarding the proposal's conformance with key criteria is provided below. Required and Specific Zoning Findings The proposal is also required to be consistent with all required findings and any applicable specific findings. The purpose of the findings is to assure the intent of the Planned Area Development zoning district - "...to foster development which is superior to that which may occur under conventional zoning regulations..."- is achieved. Several key findings and the proposals conformance is summarized below: The PAD fosters safe and efficient use of Land The Master Planning associated with the applicant's proposal allows for a comprehensive evaluation of all parcels and any potential impacts from future development. This approach allows for a holistic perspective on the entire property to ensure adjacent parcels are complimentary to one another and a safe, efficient transportation network is maintained. The applicant's proposal is consistent with this finding. The design and arrangement of elements of the site plan minimize adverse impacts to the existing natural topography, natural water courses, existing vegetation and views. The Long Range Conceptual Master Plan established the development envelopes which substantially preserved the existing washes and riparian areas which traverse the property. The proposed development scenarios have preserved a majority of the most sensitive natural areas of the site which will help maintain those areas as corridors for wildlife movement. The applicant's proposal is consistent with this finding. The proposed rezoning is consistent with all required findings as well as any applicable specific findings. A more detailed analysis of the proposals conformance with the findings is provided in Attachment 9. Environmentally Sensitive Lands Approximately 74 acres will be conserved as Environmental Sensitive Lands open space which is 36% of the entire site. This includes all significant washes that also serve as wildlife corridors. In addition, all healthy saguaros in excess of 15 feet with two or more arms must either be transplanted or preserved in place. Larger ones (24 feet or greater) must remain in place. Zoning Code Modifications The proposal also includes a number of modifications from existing zoning code standards (Attachment 10). The purpose of the Planned Area Development zoning district is "...to foster development which is superior to that which may occur under conventional zoning regulations...". The proposed modifications help meet this superior design as they provide more flexibility for the property owner, while minimizing potential impacts to nearby property owners. For example, in areas where existing topography or common area (e.g. elevation differences, existing common area open space between developments) helps minimize impacts from 2-story homes, an 18 foot, 1-story building height restriction is not required. As such, the modifications are acceptable and are supported by Town staff. A more detailed analysis of the requested modifications is provided in Attachment 11. Tentative Development Plan Concepts All rezoning applications require a rezoning Tentative Development Plan (TDP) which establishes the future design of the property, including the subdivision or commercial area designs, the circulation network (vehicular, bicycle & pedestrian) and open space areas. The applicant's proposal represents a unique approach to the rezoning Tentative Development Plan (TDP) requirement, though similar to the Oro Valley Town Center Planned Area Development (San Dorado development), which affords the applicant more flexibility in the future. The rezoning includes multiple "Tentative Development Plan Concepts" (Attachment 6) as indicated in the table below: Drainage - The proposed rezoning request acknowledges the various development areas included within the PAD will be designed so post-developed drainage conditions are consistent with pre-developed conditions in accordance with Town drainage requirements. Multiple natural washes flowing in a southerly direction affect the development areas. Furthermore, an existing FEMA mapped floodplain exists within one of the washes that runs along development areas E, H and J. A preliminary drainage analysis was prepared by the applicant to determine existing 100-year stormwater runoff values flowing through each wash, at points entering and exiting the project boundaries. The drainage systems for each development area will be designed to ensure, among other requirements, that all proposed habitable and commercial buildings adjacent to washes will be protected from flooding and erosion. The increase of runoff resulting from constructed impervious surfaces will be mitigated by use of detention basins which discharge into the existing watercourses. The detention basins capture, hold, and release stormwater in a controlled manner to mimic existing conditions. Detailed drainage studies will be done at the final site planning stage for each development area as they occur. General Traffic - The proposed master planned development will have primary access points along La Cholla Boulevard, Naranja Drive, Lambert Lane and Cross Road. There will also be a number of new roads within the development which will provide access and distribute incoming and outgoing traffic throughout the various development areas. A detailed traffic impact analysis was provided with the Site Analysis to evaluate the effect of additional traffic on surrounding roadways. The generation of new traffic from the various development areas will vary from lower volumes in less intense use areas (e.g., residential subdivisions) to moderately higher levels in more intense use areas (e.g., commercial). Internal streets, access drives and parking areas within the development areas will be constructed to Town code standards. Off-site improvements will include widening in areas for turn lanes where warranted along the project frontages by the developer. Public roadway improvements to be completed by the developer shall be at their expense and will require approval and a permit issued from the Town Engineer’s office. Furthermore, detailed traffic impact analysis updates will be required at the final site planning stage for each development area as they occur. Proposed use(s) by Parcel PARCEL PROPOSED LAND USES(S)# OF DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS Parcel A Neighborhood Commercial/Office (C-N) or Medium Density Residential 4 (3 commercial/office & 1 residential) Parcel B Community Commercial (C-1) or Medium Density Residential 5 (4 commercial & 1 residential) Parcel C Recreation 1 Parcel D High Density Residential or Medium Density Residential 4 (3 attached residential & 1 detached residential) Parcel E High Density Residential, Medium Density Residential or Church Expansion 5 (3 attached residential & 1 detached residential & 1 church expansion) Parcel F Recreation 1 Parcel G Recreation 1 Parcel H Medium Density Single-family Residential 1 Parcel J Community Commercial (C-1)3 Parcel K Low Density Residential 1 Parcel L Low Density Residential or Church Expansion 2 (1 residential & 1 church expansion) Parcel M Low Density Residential 1 Cañada Hills Drive Intersection - There is a General Plan policy applicable to the Capella project which states that traffic shall not be allowed to cross La Cholla Boulevard directly from the Capella PAD area to Cañada Hills Drive, which is a private street. The Traffic Impact Analysis indicates that a future traffic signal is warranted at this intersection. Timing of the signal installation and associated intersection improvements shall coincide with construction of any PAD development area or construction of the proposed roadway creating the west leg of the intersection, whichever occurs first. The applicant's proposal conforms to this Special Area Policy as the final design will not permit eastbound or westbound through traffic across La Cholla Boulevard. La Cholla Widening - Construction for the widening of La Cholla Boulevard to four lanes, as funded by the RTA, is anticipated to begin during the summer of 2018. This significant roadway improvement will increase roadway capacity and safety to accommodate existing traffic conditions and proposed future projects such as this one. There has been coordination between the Capella developer and Town staff to determine appropriate access locations along the newly designed La Cholla Boulevard corridor. Each of the proposed individual concepts are in conformance with all Zoning Code requirements. A more detailed analysis of the Tentative Development Plan Concepts is provided in Attachment 12. E. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION The following public notice has been provided: Notification of all property owners within 1,000 feet Notification to additional interested parties who signed in at neighborhood meetings, including the neighborhood meetings held regarding the previous General Plan Amendment Notification to all Homeowner's Associations Advertisement in The Daily Territorial newspaper Postings on the property Postings at Town Hall and on the Town website Six neighborhood meetings were held (2 traditional, 4 focus group) regarding the proposed rezoning. Neighborhood meeting summaries are provided in Attachment 13. It is important to remember the preceding General Plan Amendment process involved an extraordinary amount of public participation and input that resulted in several outcomes which serve as the groundwork for the applicant's proposal. The General Plan public input process included four neighborhood meetings (3 traditional, 1 open house) and numerous smaller focus group meetings. Staff has received 3 letters of opposition from neighbors regarding the proposed rezoning which have been included in Attachment 14. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered the applicant's proposal at two public hearings, March 6, 2018 and April 3, 2018. During the second hearing the Commission recommended approval of the applicant's proposal with several additional conditions (in italics) detailed below: All future site plans for each parcel will go through the Conceptual Site Plan process to be considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission as well as Town Council for further review. 1. The number of proposed Tentative Development Plan Concept scenarios was a focal issue for the Commission. Much of the discussion revolved around both the Commissions and neighbors inability to tie down one develop scenario. Commissioners stated that it was difficult to fully evaluate all of the potential impacts considering the total number of combinations that could be developed. Complete an updated Traffic Impact Analysis for each development phase as required by Town Code.2. Traffic in the La Cholla corridor is a concern for many residents in the area. The Commission wanted to clearly reiterate this existing zoning code requirement to continually update the projects traffic analysis as each parcel is developed to ensure sufficient capacity exists for the anticipated increase in traffic. Parcel M is restricted to 1-story height within 300 feet of the west property boundary.3. During the prior General Plan Amendment process, a Special Area Policy was developed for Parcels K and L, both immediately south of Parcel M, limiting building heights of structures within 300 feet of the west property boundary to 1-story. The Commission felt this limitation should also be applied to Parcel M to protect views of future homeowners on the Shannon 80 property immediately west. protect views of future homeowners on the Shannon 80 property immediately west. The plans for restrooms and playgrounds in recreation areas must be maintained. 4. The applicant's proposal for recreation represents a minimum level of amount and type for amenities. The Commission felt it important to specify that all proposed restrooms and playgrounds be provided as part of the minimum requirement. The staff reports are included as Attachment 15 and the meeting minutes are included as Attachment 16. F. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION In summary, there are a number of key factors regarding the proposed rezoning. Those factors include: The Planning and Zoning Commission has recommended conditional approval, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1. 1. The proposal represents a comprehensively planned design which includes a variety of complimentary land uses 2. The request is consistent with the Long Range Conceptual Master Plan approved as part of the preceding General Plan Amendment process 3. The request satsifies all General Plan Special Area Policies.4. The most sensitive parts of the property (riparian areas or washes) are being substantially preserved5. Impacts to neighbors have been minimized as part of the design6. Based on the aforementioned factors, the Planning and Zoning Commission has recommended approval of the applicant's proposal, subject to the conditions listed in Attachment 1. FISCAL IMPACT: None. SUGGESTED MOTION: The Town Council may wish to consider one of the following suggested motions: I MOVE to APPROVE Ordinance No. (O)18-07, rezoning from R1-144 to Planned Area Development, subject to the conditions listed in Attachment 1, because the request is consistent with the Your Voice, Our Future General Plan, including the Specific Area Policies, and all applicable Zoning Code standards. OR I MOVE to DENY Ordinance No. (O)18-07, rezoning from R1-144 to Planned Area Development, based on a finding that ________________________________________________. Attachments ATTACHMENT 1 - ORD NO. (O)18-07 ATTACHMENT 2 - APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL ATTACHMENT 3 - LOCATION MAP ATTACHMENT 4 - LONG RANGE CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN ATTACHMENT 5 - SPECIAL AREA POLICIES ATTACHMENT 6 - TENTATIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONCEPTS ATTACHMENT 7 - GENERAL PLAN & ZONING MAPS ATTACHMENT 8 - GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE ANALYSIS ATTACHMENT 9 - ZONING CODE CONFORMANCE ANALYSIS ATTACHMENT 10 - REQUESTED ZONING CODE MODIFICATIONS ATTACHMENT 11 - ZONING CODE MODIFICATIONS ANALYSIS ATTACHMENT 12- TENTATIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONCEPTS ANALYSIS ATTACHMENT 13 - NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING SUMMARIES ATTACHMENT 14 - NEIGHBOR COMMENT LETTERS ATTACHMENT 15 - MARCH 6 AND APRIL 3 PZC STAFF REPORTS ATTACHMENT 16 - MARCH 6 AND APRIL 3 PZC MEETING MINUTES ORDINANCE NO. (O)18-07 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, APPROVING A REZONING REQUEST BY THE WLB GROUP, INC, FROM R1-144 TO PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT FOR APPROXIMATELY 199 ACRES LOCATED WEST OF LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD BETWEEN LAMBERT LANE AND NARANJA DRIVE AND APPROXIMATELY 8.2 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD AND NARANJA DRIVE WHEREAS, WLB Group, Inc., (the “Applicant”) who represents the property owners, applied for a rezoning from R1-144 to Planned Area Development for approximately 199-acres located west of La Cholla Boulevard between Lambert Lane and Naranja Drive and approximately 8.2-acres located on the northwest corner of La Cholla Boulevard and Naranja Drive, see map of property as depicted on Exhibit “A” attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the gross site of the proposed rezoning is approximately 207 acres; and WHEREAS, the current zoning of R1-144 allows one lot per 144,000 square feet; and WHEREAS, the Applicant wishes to change the zoning to Planned Area Development to facilitate development of a comprehensively planned project which includes residential, commercial, recreation and quasi-public development; and WHEREAS, in 2015 a General Plan Amendment to Master Planned Community was approved for the site which included the development of a Long Range Conceptual Master Plan as well as numerous Special Area Policies; and WHEREAS, the Applicant’s request is consistent with both the General Plan, the Long Range Conceptual Master Plan and the Special Area Polices; and WHEREAS, the Applicant’s request for rezoning complies with the OVZCR, including the requirements for new Planned Area Developments; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission held two duly noticed public hearings on March 6, 2018, and April 3, 2018, and voted to recommend approval to the Town Council with conditions, attached hereto as Exhibit “B”; and WHEREAS, the Town Council has duly considered the Applicant’s request for rezoning for approximately 199-acres located west of La Cholla Boulevard between Lambert Lane and Naranja Drive and approximately 8.2-acres located on the northwest corner of La Cholla Boulevard and Naranja Drive. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona that the rezoning requested by the Applicant, a rezoning for approximately 199-acres located west of La Cholla Boulevard between Lambert Lane and Naranja Drive and approximately 8.2-acres located on the northwest corner of La Cholla Boulevard and Naranja Drive is hereby approved with the conditions attached hereto as Exhibit “B”. NOW THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that: 1.All Oro Valley ordinances, resolutions or motions and parts of ordinances, resolutions or motions of the Council in conflict with the provision of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. 2.If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, on this 16 th day ofMay, 2018. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Dr. Satish I. Hiremath, Mayor ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM : Michael Standish, Town Clerk Tobin Sidles, Legal Services Director Date: Date: EXHIBIT “A” MAP OF PROPERTY EXHIBIT “B” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ADDED CONDITIONS 1.All future site plans for each parcel will go through the Conceptual Site Plan process to be considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission as well as Town Council for further Review. 2.Complete an updated Traffic Impact Analysis for each development phase as required by Town Code. 3.Parcel M is restricted to 1-story height within 300-feet of the west property boundary. 4.The plans for restrooms and playgrounds in recreation areas must be maintained. PLANNING Page 52 5.Revise development standard d.ii.5 to reflect a minimum front setback of 15-feet with at least 20 provided for driveway length. 6.Remove first part of development standard d.ii.6 to reflect existing maximum building height permitted in the R1-7 zoning district. Page 58 7.Revise development standard d.ii.3 to reflect a minimum front setback of 15-feet with at least 20 provided for driveway length. Page 60 8.Revise development standard d.ii.3 to reflect a minimum front setback of 15-feet with at least 20 provided for driveway length. 9.Remove first part of development standard d.ii.4 to reflect existing maximum building height permitted in the R1-7 zoning district. Page 63 10. Revise development standard d.ii.3 to reflect a minimum front setback of 15-feet with at least 20 provided for driveway length. 11. Remove first part of development standard d.ii.4 to reflect existing maximum building height permitted in the R1-7 zoning district. Page 144 12. Remove reference to restroom structures in section 2.A.v. as they are not a permitted use in ESOS areas. ENGINEERING 13. Off-site public roadway improvements shall be completed by the developer as identified within the project Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIA) submitted with the Capella PAD. Minimum improvements required as identified within the TIA consist of the following: a.Cañada Hills Drive/La Cholla Boulevard intersection: The installation of a traffic signal and associated intersection improvements to prohibit both eastbound and westbound through traffic across La Cholla Boulevard. The through traffic restriction will satisfy the Capella Special Area Policy intended to prevent new development traffic from accessing Cañada Hills Drive from the west side of La Cholla Boulevard. Timing of the signal installation and associated intersection improvements shall coincide with construction of any PAD development area or construction of the proposed roadway creating the new west leg of the intersection, whichever occurs first. b.Lambert Lane/Shannon Road intersection: The installation of additional turn/through lanes and/or a traffic signal (when warranted). The geometric design of the intersection and timing of the improvements shall be as approved by Pima County. c.Lambert Lane: The widening of Lambert Lane to accommodate two through lanes in the eastbound and westbound directions, from La Cholla Boulevard to the western project limits. Timing of the improvements shall coincide with the construction of Development Areas J, H and K as they develop. d.Other off-site improvements such as the construction of new right/left-turn lanes shall be constructed by the developer with each development area as warranted by the TIA and at no cost to the Town. 14. The owner(s) of the Capella development shall dedicate right-of-way along the project’s La Cholla Boulevard frontage as identified and requested during previous coordination meetings with Town staff. Dedication of the right-way is to be completed within 30 days of Town Council approval of this PAD request. 15. The owner(s) of the Capella development shall dedicate easements for the purposes of public drainage and slope encroachments along the project’s La Cholla Boulevard frontage as identified and requested during previous coordination meetings with Town staff. Dedication of the easements are to be completed within 45 days of Town Council approval of this PAD request. PREPARED FOR: Casas Adobes Baptist Church 10801 N. La Cholla Blvd. Oro Valley, Arizona 85742 The Kai Family La Cholla 311, LLC 6088 W. Arizona Pavilions Dr. #2 Marana, Arizona 85743 T/F Naranja Group, LLC Post Office Box 31987 Tucson, Arizona 85751 PREPARED BY: The WLB Group, Inc. Attn: Paul Oland 4444 East Broadway Tucson, Arizona 85711 Suite 6 Architecture + Planning, Inc. Attn: Dean Munkachy 6111 North Cattletrack Road Scottsdale, Arizona 85250 WLB No. 110028-A-003 February 5, 2018 Q:\110028\A -003 - PAD\01 Planning\04 PAD\Submittals\3rd Submittal PAD Assembly\Capella PAD Text - 4th Subm FINALr1.docx Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 i CONTENTS Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Part I – Land Uses .............................................................................................................................. 3 1. Existing Land Uses ........................................................................................................................................... 5 A. Regional context ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 B. Onsite ...................................................................................................................................................................... 5 C. Project Vicinity ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 Exhibit I-1-C1: Site Location Map ...................................................................................................................... 7 Exhibit I-1-C2: Aerial Photograph ..................................................................................................................... 8 Exhibit I-1-C3: Existing General Plan Future Land Use Designations ............................................................... 9 Exhibit I-1-C4: Existing Zoning ........................................................................................................................ 10 Exhibit I-1-C5: Existing Land Uses ................................................................................................................... 11 2. PAD Development Plan ................................................................................................................................. 12 A. Development Concept and General Plan Consistency ......................................................................................... 12 B. Policies Applicable to the Entire PAD .................................................................................................................... 13 Exhibit I-2-B: Adopted General Plan Ordinance .............................................................................................. 14 C. Development Parcels ............................................................................................................................................ 26 Table I-2-C1: Land Use Summary ................................................................................................................... 26 Table I-2-C2: Individual Development Parcels ............................................................................................... 26 Exhibit I-2-C: Proposed Land Use Plan ............................................................................................................ 27 D. Development Phasing ........................................................................................................................................... 29 Exhibit I-2-D: Estimated Phasing Plan ............................................................................................................ 30 E. Development Criteria by Parcel ............................................................................................................................ 31 i. Parcel A – Neighborhood Commercial / Office ............................................................................... 31 Exhibit I-2-E-A1: Tentative Development Plan Parcel A Concept 1 ................................................................ 32 Exhibit I-2-E-A2: Tentative Development Plan Parcel A Concept 2 ................................................................ 33 Exhibit I-2-E-A3: Tentative Development Plan Parcel A Concept 3 ................................................................ 34 Exhibit I-2-E-A4: Tentative Development Plan Parcel A Concept 4 ................................................................ 35 ii. Parcel B – Community Commercial ................................................................................................. 36 Exhibit I-2-E-B1: Tentative Development Plan Parcel B Concept 1 ................................................................. 37 Exhibit I-2-E-B2: Tentative Development Plan Parcel B Concept 2 ................................................................. 38 Exhibit I-2-E-B3: Tentative Development Plan Parcel B Concept 3 ................................................................. 39 Exhibit I-2-E-B4: Tentative Development Plan Parcel B Concept 4 ................................................................. 40 Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 ii Exhibit I-2-E-B5: Tentative Development Plan Parcel B Concept 5 ................................................................. 41 iii. Parcels D & E – High Density Residential / Casas Campus Expansion (Parcel E) ............................ 42 Exhibit I-2-E-D1: Tentative Development Plan Parcel D Concept 1 ................................................................ 43 Exhibit I-2-E-D2: Tentative Development Plan Parcel D Concept 2 ................................................................ 44 Exhibit I-2-E-D3: Tentative Development Plan Parcel D Concept 3 ................................................................ 45 Exhibit I-2-E-D4: Tentative Development Plan Parcel D Concept 4 ................................................................ 46 Exhibit I-2-E-E1: Tentative Development Plan Parcel E Concept 1 ................................................................. 47 Exhibit I-2-E-E2: Tentative Development Plan Parcel E Concept 2 ................................................................. 48 Exhibit I-2-E-E3: Tentative Development Plan Parcel E Concept 3 ................................................................. 49 Exhibit I-2-E-E4: Tentative Development Plan Parcel E Concept 4 ................................................................. 50 Exhibit I-2-E-E5: Tentative Development Plan Parcel E Concept 5 ................................................................. 51 iv. Parcel H – Medium Density Residential .......................................................................................... 52 Exhibit I-2-E-H: Tentative Development Plan Parcel H Concept ..................................................................... 53 v. Parcel J – Community Commercial .................................................................................................. 54 Exhibit I-2-E-J1: Tentative Development Plan Parcel J Concept 1 .................................................................. 55 Exhibit I-2-E-J2: Tentative Development Plan Parcel J Concept 2 .................................................................. 56 Exhibit I-2-E-J3: Tentative Development Plan Parcel J Concept 3 .................................................................. 57 vi. Parcel K– Low Density Residential ................................................................................................... 58 Exhibit I-2-E-K: Tentative Development Plan Parcel K Concept ...................................................................... 59 vii. Parcel L – Low Density Residential / Casas Campus Expansion ...................................................... 60 Exhibit I-2-E-L1: Tentative Development Plan Parcel L Concept 1.................................................................. 61 Exhibit I-2-E-L2: Tentative Development Plan Parcel L Concept 2.................................................................. 62 viii. Parcel M – Low Density Residential ................................................................................................. 63 Exhibit I-2-E-M: Tentative Development Plan Parcel M Concept ................................................................... 64 F. Open Space & Recreation Concept ....................................................................................................................... 65 i. Types of Open Space ........................................................................................................................ 65 ii. Percentages by Type and Amounts of Open Space ........................................................................ 65 iii. Treatments and Purposes of Open Space ....................................................................................... 66 iv. Ownership of Open Space ............................................................................................................... 66 G. Landscape, Buffering, and Screening .................................................................................................................... 67 i. Landscape Concept .......................................................................................................................... 67 ii. Plant Palette ..................................................................................................................................... 67 iii. Native Plant Preservation, Salvage and Mitigation ......................................................................... 67 iv. Bufferyards & Screening .................................................................................................................. 68 Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 iii Exhibit I-2-F: Proposed Landscape & Bufferyard Plan .................................................................................... 69 H. Thematic Imagery .................................................................................................................................................. 70 Exhibit I-2-H1: Visual Theming - Landscaping ................................................................................................ 71 Exhibit I-2-H2: Visual Theming - Lighting ....................................................................................................... 72 Exhibit I-2-H3: Visual Theming - Materials ..................................................................................................... 73 Exhibit I-2-H4: Visual Theming – Pedestrian Elements ................................................................................... 74 Exhibit I-2-H5: Entries & Monumentation ...................................................................................................... 75 Exhibit I-2-H6: Visual Theming - Courtyards ................................................................................................... 76 Exhibit I-2-H7: Visual Theming – Architectural Details & Fenestration .......................................................... 77 Part II – Environmentally Sensitive Lands ........................................................................................ 79 1. Existing Conditions ........................................................................................................................................ 81 A. ESL Categories Onsite ............................................................................................................................................ 81 B. Additional ESL Characteristics ............................................................................................................................... 81 2. PAD Response ................................................................................................................................................ 82 A. Environmentally Sensitive Open Space (ESOS) ..................................................................................................... 82 B. ESOS Selection, Priority Resources, and Selection Criteria .................................................................................. 82 C. Methods of Permanent ESOS Protection .............................................................................................................. 83 D. ESOS Protection ..................................................................................................................................................... 83 E. ESOS Location Concept and Flexibility .................................................................................................................. 83 Exhibit II-1-A: Environmentally Sensitive Lands .............................................................................................. 84 Exhibit II-2-A: ESOS Plan ................................................................................................................................. 85 Table II-2-B-1: ESOS Calculations .................................................................................................................... 86 Part III – Topography ....................................................................................................................... 88 1. Existing Conditions ........................................................................................................................................ 90 2. PAD Response ................................................................................................................................................ 90 Exhibit III-1-A: Topography ............................................................................................................................. 91 Exhibit III-2-A: Proposed Grading Limits ......................................................................................................... 92 Part IV – Cultural / Archaeological / Historic Resources .................................................................. 94 1. Existing Conditions ........................................................................................................................................ 96 2. PAD Response ................................................................................................................................................ 98 Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 iv Part V – Hydrology ......................................................................................................................... 100 1. Existing Conditions ...................................................................................................................................... 102 A. Offsite Watersheds .............................................................................................................................................. 102 B. Balanced and Critical Basins. ............................................................................................................................... 102 C. Significant Offsite Features Affecting the Site .................................................................................................... 102 D. Area of Offsite Watersheds Discharging >100 CFS ............................................................................................. 102 E. Wells within 100’ ................................................................................................................................................. 102 F. Characteristics of Onsite Hydrology .................................................................................................................... 102 G. Drainage Conditions along the Downstream Property Boundary ...................................................................... 103 2. PAD Response .............................................................................................................................................. 103 Exhibit V-1-A: Offsite Watersheds ............................................................................................................... 104 Exhibit V-1-F: Onsite Hydrology Characteristics .......................................................................................... 105 Exhibit V-2-A: Proposed Hydrology Plan ...................................................................................................... 106 Part VI – Wildlife ............................................................................................................................ 108 1. Existing Conditions ...................................................................................................................................... 110 2. PAD Response .............................................................................................................................................. 110 Exhibit VI-1-A: AZGFD Letter ........................................................................................................................ 111 Part VII – Viewsheds ...................................................................................................................... 122 1. Existing Conditions ...................................................................................................................................... 124 2. PAD Response .............................................................................................................................................. 125 Exhibit VII-2-A: Site Cross-Sections Key Map ............................................................................................... 126 Exhibit VII-2-B: Site Cross-Section A ............................................................................................................. 128 Exhibit VII-2-C: Site Cross-Section B ............................................................................................................. 129 Exhibit VII-2-D: Site Cross-Section C ............................................................................................................. 130 Exhibit VII-2-E: Site Cross-Section D ............................................................................................................. 131 Exhibit VII-2-F: Site Cross-Section E ............................................................................................................. 132 Part VIII – Traffic ............................................................................................................................ 134 1. Existing Conditions ...................................................................................................................................... 136 2. PAD Response .............................................................................................................................................. 138 Exhibit VIII-1-A: Existing Roadway Network ................................................................................................ 139 Exhibit VIII-2-A: Proposed Trunk Infrastructure Plan - Roads ...................................................................... 140 Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 v Part IX – Recreation / Trails ........................................................................................................... 142 1. Existing Conditions ...................................................................................................................................... 144 A. Trails, Parks, and Recreation Areas within One Mile .......................................................................................... 144 Table IX-1-A: Nearby Recreational Facilities ............................................................................................... 144 2. PAD Response .............................................................................................................................................. 144 A. Recreation Areas ................................................................................................................................................. 144 B. Access to Recreation Areas & Trails ................................................................................................................... 145 C. Ownership of Recreation Areas & Trails ............................................................................................................. 145 Exhibit IX-1-A: Trails, Parks & Recreation .................................................................................................... 146 Exhibit IX-2-B: Proposed Recreation & Trails Plan ....................................................................................... 147 Exhibit IX-2-C: Parcel C Rec. Area Concept .................................................................................................. 148 Exhibit IX-2-D: Parcel F Rec. Area Concept .................................................................................................. 149 Exhibit IX-2-E: Parcel G Rec. Area Concept .................................................................................................. 150 Part X – Schools ............................................................................................................................. 152 1. Existing Conditions ...................................................................................................................................... 154 2. PAD Response .............................................................................................................................................. 154 Exhibit X-1-A: Existing & Proposed Schools ................................................................................................. 156 Exhibit X-2-A: Amphitheater School District Letter ...................................................................................... 157 Part XI – Water .............................................................................................................................. 158 1. Existing Conditions ...................................................................................................................................... 160 2. PAD Response .............................................................................................................................................. 160 Exhibit XI-1-A: Water Capacity Letter .......................................................................................................... 161 Exhibit XI-1-B: Existing Water Infrastructure ............................................................................................... 163 Exhibit XI-2-A: Proposed Trunk Infrastructure Plan - Water ........................................................................ 164 Part XII – Wastewater .................................................................................................................... 166 1. Existing Conditions ...................................................................................................................................... 168 2. PAD Response .............................................................................................................................................. 168 Exhibit XII-1-A: Sewer Capacity Letter ......................................................................................................... 169 Exhibit XII-1-B: Existing Sewer Infrastructure .............................................................................................. 170 Exhibit XII-2-A: Proposed Trunk Infrastructure Plan - Sewer ....................................................................... 171 Part XIII – McHarg Composite Map ............................................................................................... 172 Exhibit XIII-1-A: McHarg Composite Map .................................................................................................... 174 Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 vi Part XIV – PAD Administration ....................................................................................................... 176 1. Interpretation .............................................................................................................................................. 178 2. Conflict......................................................................................................................................................... 178 3. Land Uses Not Listed ................................................................................................................................... 178 4. Development Regulations and Standards Not Listed ................................................................................. 178 5. Amendments ............................................................................................................................................... 179 Part XV – General Plan Policy Compliance Analysis ....................................................................... 180 1. General Plan Policy Compliance Analysis.................................................................................................... 182 Part XVI – Summary Table of Zoning Standard Modifications ....................................................... 186 1. Summary Table of Zoning Standard Modifications .................................................................................... 188 Introduction Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 1 Introduction This document has been prepared to meet the requirements of the Town of Oro Valley for establishment of a Planned Area Development (PAD) district. The Capella property is comprised of several parcels totaling approximately 207 acres located along the west side of La Cholla Boulevard between Lambert Lane and Glover Road. The Kai family acquired the subject property south of Naranja Drive and adjacent lands in the 1980s. In the mid-1990s a central portion of the overall land holdings was sold to Casas Church in order to establish a generous amount of land for the church congregation to grow and expand the variety of ministries that Casas provides to the community, including the elementary school. The Casas parcel was intentionally carved from the middle of the overall Kai property so that it could become an activity center within a future master planned development, or PAD. The property was annexed into the Town from unincorporated Pima County in 2002. Capella’s size and location along La Cholla Boulevard provide an excellent opportunity to carefully master plan the property via the Town’s PAD zoning district. The General Plan was recently amended to reflect Capella as a Master Planned Community. The Amendment process took nearly two years, and was the result of extensive coordination with nearby neighbors and stakeholders. The Amendment’s approval was conditioned upon a variety of specific development guidelines and standards that will help the project to be developed as a successful master plan. Because of Capella’s size and location, its development will impact the vicinity. With careful and sensitive planning, that impact will be positive. The Town’s existing Zoning Code regulations and Design Guidelines provide a strong foundation for quality development. Applying a number of important adjustments to those regulations and guidelines specifically within the context of this PAD will help ensure the development of Capella is of the quality desired by the Kai family, Casas Church, the Town, and the project’s neighbors. The adopted Master Planned Community designation establishes a number of land uses as being appropriate for development within Capella. Lower density residential land uses are to be developed in the western portions of Capella, while non-residential and higher density residential land uses within the PAD are to be developed along La Cholla Boulevard, which will soon be widened by the Town in cooperation with the Regional Transportation Authority. La Cholla Blvd. will be expanded from a two-lane rural collector road to a four-lane, divided suburban arterial road, drastically transforming the character of the whole corridor as La Cholla is finally established as the major regional route that it has long been planned to be. Residential development within Capella will consist of attached and detached residential housing types, but will not include apartments. Residential densities will transition from high to low as distance from La Cholla Blvd. increases. This PAD document is divided into fourteen Parts, each addressing a different aspect of land development such as land use, environmental concerns, hydrology, archaeology, traffic, schools, recreation, utilities, and so on. Each Part describes the existing conditions of that development opportunity or constraint, and the PAD’s response to those conditions. For example, Part IX: Recreation / Trails describes and maps existing recreational amenities in the vicinity of the Capella PAD. The second half of Part IX goes on to detail and map the trails and recreational amenities that will be constructed within the PAD, as well as how they will fit into the recreational fabric of the surrounding area. Introduction Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 2 (This page intentionally blank) Part I – Land Uses Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 3 Part I – Land Uses Part I – Land Uses Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 4 (This page intentionally blank) Part I – Land Uses Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 5 1. Existing Land Uses A. Regional context The Capella property is located in the Town of Oro Valley in portions of Sections 4 and 9, Township 12, Range 13 East, Pima County Arizona. The site sits adjacent to the west side of La Cholla Boulevard between Glover Road and Lambert Lane. It contains the following Assessor Parcel Numbers: • North of Naranja Drive: Portions of 224-11-061J, 224-11-061H, and 224-11-061G. • South of Naranja Drive: 224-20-001C, 224-20-001D, 224-20-002D, 224-20-002G, 224-23-001A, and a portion of 224-20-002B. The area of properties contained in this Planned Area Development are 8± acres north of Naranja Drive and 199± acres south of Naranja Drive, totaling 207± acres. Please refer to Exhibit I-1-C1: Site Location Map and Exhibit I-1-C2: Aerial Photograph. B. Onsite Capella is currently vacant. The proposed PAD surrounds Casas Church and school, which is at the geographic center of Capella. Additionally, Meritage Homes is currently constructing the Estates at Capella, which is a single-family neighborhood directly north of Casas Church, adjacent to the Capella PAD. C. Project Vicinity i. Existing zoning: North: R1-144 and R1-20 East: C-2, R-6, R-4, R1-7, R1-10, and PAD South: R1-20 West: R1-144 Please refer to Exhibit I-1-C3: Existing General Plan Future Land Use Designations and Exhibit I-1-C4: Existing Zoning. Part I – Land Uses Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 6 ii. Existing land uses: North: The Estates at Capella, a residential subdivision currently under construction, Rancho del Cobre, a residential subdivision currently under construction, Ironwood Canyon, a residential subdivision, Wilson K-8 School, Saguaros Viejos, an undeveloped residential neighborhood. East: Canada Hills, a PAD including single- and multi-family residential development, retail, professional office and service uses. Canada Hills Golf Course. South: Chaparral Heights, a residential subdivision. West: Rancho de Suenos, a residential subdivision, Unplanned residential development, Ironwood Ridge High School. Please refer to Exhibit I-1-C5: Existing Land Uses. iii. Number of stories of existing structures: A significant proportion of the homes within one-quarter mile of Capella, most of which are to the east, are two-story. The area around Capella also includes several large, massive structures which are relatively tall. While the Casas Church, which the Capella PAD surrounds, is technically single story, the buildings are much more massive and visually more prominent than a typical single story home. The tallest portion of the Casas Church is approximately 44 feet. Ironwood Ridge High School, abutting Capella, has several very large two story buildings (approximately 39’ in height) which are visually more prominent than any other nearby structures. iv. Pending rezonings: Saguaros Viejos Ph. 2, which is directly north of Capella. v. Conditionally approved zonings: A 143-acre property at the southeastern corner of Lambert Lane and La Cholla Boulevard was recently rezoned from R1-144 to R1-43 to allow for the development of a low density cluster subdivision of approximately 100 homes. vi. Approved Subdivisions and Development Plans: The Estates at Capella, a 120-lot single-family residential subdivision on a roughly 50-acre property was recently approved, and is currently under construction. Nestled against the northwest edge of the Capella PAD, it was designed to fit into the overall Capella master plan. vii. Architectural styles used in adjacent properties: Homes within the platted subdivisions adjacent to Capella generally incorporate contemporary southwestern architecture. Homes in nearby areas of unplanned residential development follow a variety of architectural styles. IRONWOOD RIDGE CASAS HIGH SCHOOL CHURCH GLOVER RD. NARANJA DR. CANADA HILLS D R .LA CANADA DR.LAMBERT LANESHANNON RD.K-8 LA CHOLLA BLVD.CANADA DEL ORO WAS H TANGERINE RD. WILSON SUBJECT PROPERTY Exhibit I-1-C1 Site Location Map Q:\110028\A-003 - PAD\01 Planning\04 PAD\PAD Document\Exhibits\EXHIBIT 1-1-C1 - Loc Map.dwg Plotted: May. 18, 2017Inc. Group The WLB 2000'0' Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-0037 LA CHOLLA BLVD.NARANJA DR. SCHOOL LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 1 LAMBERT LN. RURAL LOW DENSITY PUBLIC / SEMI-PUBLIC MASTER PLANNED COMMUNITY NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL / OFFICE MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL RESORT / GOLF COURSE MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL RURAL LOW DENSITY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 1 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 2 MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL MASTER PLANNED COMMUNITY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 2 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 1 Exhibit I-1-C3 Existing General Plan Land Use Designations Q:\110028\A-003 - PAD\01 Planning\04 PAD\PAD Document\Exhibits\EXHIBIT 1-1-C3 - Existing Gen Plan.dwg Plotted: May. 18, 2017Inc. Group The WLB 800'0' Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-0039 LAMBERT LN. NARANJA DR.CROSS RD.LA CHOLLA BLVD.R1-7 CR-1 CHURCH R1-20 R1-144 R1-144 R1-20 R1-7 PAD R-4 CASAS C-2 R-6 R1-10 R-6 IRONWOOD RIDGE HIGH SCHOOL R1-43 Exhibit I-1-C4 Existing Zoning Q:\110028\A-003 - PAD\01 Planning\04 PAD\PAD Document\Exhibits\EXHIBIT 1-1-C4 - Existing Zoning.dwg Plotted: May. 18, 2017Inc. Group The WLB 800'0' Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-00310 Part I – Land Uses Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 12 2. PAD Development Plan A. Development Concept and General Plan Consistency Capella promotes the well-planned and efficient use of an important property at a key location within the Town. The intersection of La Cholla Boulevard and Lambert Lane is one of the Town’s planned activity centers. Additionally, major community institutions are located adjacent to Capella including the Casas Church campus and the Ironwood Ridge High School campus. Wilson K-8 school is only one-half mile away. The Capella PAD provides for open space conservation, protection of sensitive environmental areas and encourages varieties of land uses and housing options in accordance with the Town’s Planned Area Development Requirements. The flexibility in design enabled by the PAD offers a desirable improvement over conventional zoning standards, and directly promotes the efficient use of land and infrastructure. Capella recognizes the Oro Valley General Plan’s direction regarding land use and design by implementing several General Plan policies including conserving and minimizing impacts to natural and cultural resources, providing diverse land uses that meet the Town’s growth needs, and General Plan Special Area Policies that provide guidance for detailed planning of development along the La Cholla corridor. To quote the Oro Valley General Plan, Capella is a “master planned community which includes suitable residential and commercial uses”, and provides for a “cohesive development that enhances and promotes the pedestrian experience.” Capella is a master planned community that offers residents a high quality community with amenities where they can live, recreate, have convenient access to school, church, commercial and personal services, and potentially work. The plan for Capella is supported by the Town’s General Plan which promotes a variety of single family residential dwelling types, retail services and shops, along with professional offices. Except as modified herein, development within the Capella PAD will conform to the requirements of the Town’s Environmentally Sensitive Lands Ordinance, adopted Design Standards, Design Principles, Sign Code, and Parking Code. Part I – Land Uses Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 13 B. Policies Applicable to the Entire PAD In 2015 the Town adopted General Plan Special Area Policies to the Capella project. The policies were the result of an extensive public participation effort which yielded support and unanimous Town Council approval for a planned community on the Capella property. This PAD has been created to implement those approved policies which are listed in their entirety on the following pages displaying the 2015 adapted General Plan ordinance. Policies applicable to the entire PAD are listed below. A number of other General Plan policies are applicable to specific parcels within the PAD. Those policies are listed in the sections of the PAD document pertinent to each development parcel. i. The maximum number of residential units is 500 for all areas designated as residential (including townhomes). Parcels A and B have back-up land use designations allowing an additional 70 residential units. ii. Apartments shall not be permitted. iii. Crematoriums shall not be permitted. iv. Senior Care facilities shall not be permitted unless associated with Casas Church. v. Gun and ammunition sales shall not constitute the primary use within a business. vi. Grading permits for the development shall not be issued until the contract for the Regional Transportation Authority’s widening of La Cholla Blvd. has been awarded to a contractor. vii. Traffic shall not be allowed to cross La Cholla Blvd. directly from the PAD to Cañada Hills Dr. viii. A 200-foot natural open space buffer area shall be provided on the west boundary adjacent to existing residences as shown on Exhibit I-2-C: Proposed Land Use Plan. No trails shall be provided within this buffer area. ix. Please refer to other, parcel-specific policies in Section I-2-E. Part I – Land Uses Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 14 Exhibit I-2-B: Adopted General Plan Ordinance Part I – Land Uses Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 15 Exhibit I-2-B: Adopted General Plan Ordinance (Cont’d) Part I – Land Uses Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 16 Exhibit I-2-B: Adopted General Plan Ordinance (Cont’d) Part I – Land Uses Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 17 Exhibit I-2-B: Adopted General Plan Ordinance (Cont’d) Part I – Land Uses Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 18 Exhibit I-2-B: Adopted General Plan Ordinance (Cont’d) Part I – Land Uses Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 19 Exhibit I-2-B: Adopted General Plan Ordinance (Cont’d) Part I – Land Uses Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 20 Exhibit I-2-B: Adopted General Plan Ordinance (Cont’d) Part I – Land Uses Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 21 Exhibit I-2-B: Adopted General Plan Ordinance (Cont’d) Part I – Land Uses Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 22 Exhibit I-2-B: Adopted General Plan Ordinance (Cont’d) Part I – Land Uses Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 23 Exhibit I-2-B: Adopted General Plan Ordinance (Cont’d) Part I – Land Uses Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 24 Exhibit I-2-B: Adopted General Plan Ordinance (Cont’d) Part I – Land Uses Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 25 Exhibit I-2-B: Adopted General Plan Ordinance (Cont’d) Part I – Land Uses Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 26 C. Development Parcels Table I-2-C1: Land Use Summary provides land use and zoning totals for the Capella community. The PAD includes a range of residential densities intended to provide for a variety of housing types ranging from single family detached, low density areas up to single family attached homes such as patio homes and townhomes. Table I-2-C1: Land Use Summary Land Use Underlying Zoning Acreage Percent Low Density Residential R1-7 72.4 35 Medium Density Residential R1-7 52.8 25 High Density Residential R-6 33.0 16 Neighborhood Commercial / Office C-N 8.2 4 Community Commercial C-1 31.1 15 Recreation Area POS 9.5 5 Total: 207.0 100 Note: Open space is an important component of the Capella PAD. Table II-2B-1 provides a framework by which the PAD will meet the Town’s Environmentally Sensitive Lands Ordinance’s minimum Environmentally Sensitive Open Space (ESOS) requirements. By meeting the ESLO’s ESOS requirements this PAD will exceed the Town’s PAD standards which require a minimum of 20% open space within the PAD. Table I-2-C2: Individual Development Parcels lists all development parcels in Capella along with their land use in accordance with Table I-2-C1: Land Use Summary, underlying zoning designation from the OVZCR, maximum residential density per General Plan policy, acreage and potential number of homes. It should be noted that development history in Oro Valley suggests that most parcels will be developed at less than maximum allowable density. Table I-2-C2: Individual Development Parcels Parcel Land Use Underlying Zoning Max Homes per acre Acreage *** Max Homes A Neighborhood Commercial / Office C-N 5.0* 8.2 30 B Community Commercial C-1 5.0* 12.2 40 C Recreation Area POS n/a 2.1 n/a D High Density Residential R-6 12.0 14.0 168 E High Density Residential R-6 12.0 19.0 228 F Recreation Area POS n/a 3.6 n/a G Recreation Area POS n/a 3.8 n/a H Medium Density Residential R1-7 3.0 52.8 159 J Community Commercial C-1 n/a 18.9 n/a K Low Density Residential R1-7 2.0 27.4 55 L Low Density Residential R1-7 2.0 21.0 42 M Low Density Residential R1-7 2.0 24.0 48 Total: 207.0 570** * Alternate use as established by General Plan policy. ** Maximum number of homes per General Plan policy. *** Development parcel boundaries extend to the centerline of adjacent planned rights-of-way. Inc. Group The WLB 28Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 (This page intentionally blank) Part I – Land Uses Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 29 D. Development Phasing Exhibit I-2-D: Estimated Phasing Plan is based on anticipated residential and commercial development market demand. Regardless of the actual order of development of the parcels within the PAD, developers of each parcel will construct infrastructure (i.e. roads, water, sewer, etc.) necessary to serve the parcel itself, per Town Code, as well as the following: Utility stub-outs shall be provided between phases in order to facilitate future development within the PAD. Refer to Part VIII – Traffic, Part IX – Recreation / Trails, Part XI – Water, and Part XII – Wastewater for schematic trunk utility alignments within the PAD. Recreation Areas shown on the Proposed Land Use Plan shall be constructed concurrently with the first development within each phase. “Poppy” and “Broom” public trails shown on Exhibit IX-2-B shall be constructed in conjunction with the first development within the PAD. Other trails shall be built on a parcel-by-parcel basis. Grading permits for development within the PAD shall not be issued until the contract for the Regional Transportation Authority’s widening of La Cholla Blvd. has been awarded to a contractor. The PAD shall expire twenty years after approval. Thirty days prior to the expiration the Planning & Zoning Administrator may extend the PAD approval as appropriate. OVZCR Section 24.4.I.2 shall not apply. LA CHOLLA BLVD.LAMBERT LANE NARANJA DR.CANADA HILLS DR. Ironwood Ridge High School Canada Hills Canada Hills La Cholla Estates Saguaros Viejos Estates at Capella Casas Church Chaparral Heights B C-1 12.2± Ac. D MDR / HDR 14.0± Ac. E CCE / MDR / HDR 19.0± Ac. M LDR 24.0± Ac. K LDR 27.4± Ac. H MDR 52.8± Ac. G Rec. 3.8± Ac. J C-1 18.9± Ac. A C-N 8.2± Ac. L CCE / LDR 21.0± Ac. C Rec. 2.1± Ac. CROSS R OA D F Rec. 3.6± Ac. Exhibit I-2-D Estimated Phasing Plan Q:\110028\A-003 - PAD\01 Planning\04 PAD\PAD Document\Exhibits\EXHIBIT 1-2-D - Phasing Plan.dwg Plotted: Feb. 02, 2018Inc. Group The WLB 800'0' Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-00330 LEGEND PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 PHASE 5 PHASE 6 Note: This is a phasing estimate. Final development phasing will be based on market demand. Part I – Land Uses Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 31 E. Development Criteria by Parcel The Tentative Development Plans in the Land Uses section conceptually illustrate how each site might be developed by depicting approximate magnitudes of development, land uses, and pedestrian and vehicular circulation that are allowed and envisioned within each parcel. The final development designs will be reviewed according to the criteria found in the PAD Administration section. i. Parcel A – Neighborhood Commercial / Office a. Parcel size: 8.2± acres. b. Underlying zoning district: C-N, Neighborhood Commercial / Office. C-N standards shall apply except as modified herein. c. Open space shall be provided in accordance with Part II – Environmentally Sensitive Lands. d. Modifications to underlying zoning district: i. Permitted and Prohibited Uses 1. All C-N uses permitted by Town C-N zoning are permitted except supermarkets, car washes, gas stations, auto service centers, and convenience stores such as Circle K, 7-11, or similar establishments. 2. Drive-thru uses and other convenience uses shall require approval of a Conditional Use Permit. 3. Office uses, with no retail or residential use, may occupy 100% of the developable area. 4. A back-up land use designation of Medium Density Residential (2.1 – 5.0 homes per acre) is permitted, with a cap of 30 residential units. The back-up designation may only be utilized once the PAD’s residential parcels have been developed. If this alternative is utilized, the entire site may be used for residential purposes without the standard C-N limit of no more than 50% residential use. If utilized, residential development will follow the Medium Density Residential standards of Parcel H, except that the maximum building height is 24 feet. 5. Commercial uses shall be no greater than 20,000 square feet of gross floor area per individual business. Expansions of commercial uses beyond these floor area limits may be allowed with a conditional use permit. Other commercial floor area limits of the C-N district shall not apply. 6. Packaged alcohol sales shall not constitute the primary use within a business. ii. Development Standards 1. Maximum building height: 24 feet, 2 stories 2. The general arrangement of buildings, parking and other site features shown on the Tentative Development Plans represents adequate parking distribution, and thus meets OVZCR standards for parking lot configuration. 3. Buildings within 85 feet of residential zones to the north or west of the site are limited to 18 feet. Common area within adjacent residential zones shall count toward the 85-foot setback. Part I – Land Uses Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 36 ii. Parcel B – Community Commercial a. Parcel size: 12.2± acres. b. Underlying zoning district: C-1, Community Commercial C-1 standards shall apply except as modified herein. c. Open space shall be provided in accordance with Part II – Environmentally Sensitive Lands. d. Modifications to underlying zoning district: i. Permitted and Prohibited Uses 1. All C-1 uses permitted by Town zoning are permitted except broadcasting stations, fabric stores, medical marijuana dispensaries, video stores, appliance repair stores, laundromats, car washes, auto service centers, theaters, major communications facilities, and convenience stores such as Circle K, 7-11, or similar establishments. 2. Drive-thru uses and other convenience uses shall require approval of a Conditional Use Permit. 3. Medical offices, business incubators, and research & development laboratories shall be allowed. 4. A back-up land use designation of Medium Density Residential (2.1 – 5.0 homes per acre) is permitted, with a cap of 40 residential units. The back-up designation may only be utilized once the PAD’s residential parcels have been developed. If this alternative is utilized, the entire site may be used for residential purposes. If utilized, residential development will follow the Medium Density Residential standards of Parcel H. 5. Packaged alcohol sales shall not constitute the primary use within a business. 4. Dry cleaning establishments shall be limited to drop-off / pick-up only. ii. Development Standards 1. The maximum building heights shall be limited as follows:  For anchor retail spaces and office buildings: 30 feet.  For shop spaces, pads or other commercial buildings: 25 feet. 2. The general arrangement of buildings, parking and other site features shown on the Tentative Development Plans represents adequate parking distribution, and thus meets OVZCR standards for parking lot configuration. 3. Additional architectural treatments shall be incorporated into the building designs in order to visually diminish the mass of buildings over 60,000 square feet. 4. Enhanced landscape and architectural screening shall be implemented where retail loading zones abut Sculptor Drive. Part I – Land Uses Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 42 iii. Parcels D & E – High Density Residential / Casas Campus Expansion (Parcel E) a. Parcel sizes: Parcel D is 14.0± acres. Parcel E is 19.0± acres. b. Underlying zoning district: R-6, Multi-Family Residential. R-6 standards shall apply except as modified herein. c. Open space shall be provided in accordance with Part II – Environmentally Sensitive Lands. d. Modifications to underlying zoning district: i. Permitted and Prohibited Uses 1. Residential uses in accordance with the R-6 district are permitted except that apartments are not permitted. 2. Maximum gross residential density: 12 homes per acre (396 units). 3. The Medium Density Residential development standards of Parcel H may be utilized for these parcels, in which case the Development Standards listed Section ii below, shall not apply. 4. Expansions of the Casas Church/Casas Christian School campus shall be allowed on Parcel E, with a maximum building height of 36 feet for a gymnasium, and 28 feet for all other buildings. 5. Senior care facilities are permitted if associated with Casas Church. ii. Development Standards 1. The common outdoor living space described in OVZCR Section 23.7.E.2.a shall be provided and shall be credited toward required Resource Management Area ESOS if contiguous to other qualifying ESOS. 2. OVZCR Section 23.7.E.2.c, regarding private outdoor living space, shall not apply as apartment units are not permitted. All attached single family units will provide private yards and/or patios for residents. OVZCR Section 23.7.E.6.a. shall not apply insofar as it relates to provision of indoor recreational facilities. 3. A 50’ setback from R1 districts is required for buildings over 18’. Public rights-of-way and common area within adjacent residential zones shall count toward the setback. Part I – Land Uses Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 52 iv. Parcel H – Medium Density Residential a. Parcel size: 52.8± acres. b. Underlying zoning district: R1-7, Single Family Residential. R1-7 standards shall apply except as modified herein. c. Open space shall be provided in accordance with Part II – Environmentally Sensitive Lands. d. Modifications to underlying zoning district: i. Permitted and Prohibited Uses 1. All uses permitted by the R1-7 district are permitted. 2. Maximum gross residential density is 3 homes per acre (158 units). ii. Development Standards 1. Minimum lot size is 6,600 square feet, except the minimum lot size shall be 10,000 square feet for lots adjacent to Lambert Lane. 2. The minimum lot width is 55 feet. 3. Minimum side setback is 5 feet. 4. For 10,000 square foot lots adjacent to Lambert Lane, the minimum side setback is 7.5 feet. 5. Minimum front setback is 5 feet for side-entry garages, 10 feet for non-garage areas of the home, and 20 feet for front-facing garages. In no instance shall a driveway length of less than 20 feet be provided. 6. The maximum building height is 28 feet and two stories, except within 300 feet of the Lambert Lane right-of-way the maximum building height is 20 feet and 1-story. 7. Perimeter bufferyards with enhanced vegetation, as defined in Section I-2-F-iv, Bufferyards and Screening, shall be installed to reduce visual impacts of new homes or structures along Lambert Lane. Part I – Land Uses Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 54 v. Parcel J – Community Commercial a. Parcel size: 18.9± acres. b. Underlying zoning district: C-1, Community Commercial. C-1 standards shall apply except as modified herein. c. Open space shall be provided in accordance with Part II – Environmentally Sensitive Lands. d. Modifications to underlying zoning district: i. Land Use 1. All C-1 uses enabled by Town Zoning are permitted. 2. All C-1 conditional uses depicted on the Tentative Development Plan concepts are permitted. 3. Any C-1 conditional use not depicted on a Tentative Development Plan concept will require a conditional use permit. 4. Commercial uses shall be no greater than 125,000 square feet of gross floor area per individual business. ii. Development Standards 1. The maximum building heights from finished floor elevation to roof deck shall be limited as follows:  For anchor spaces: 30 feet.  For shop spaces, pads, and other buildings: 25 feet.  Architecturally appropriate elements such as bell/clock towers, parapet walls, and mechanical screening features may exceed this limitation by no more than 10 feet. 2. The general arrangement of buildings, parking and other site features shown on the Tentative Development Plans represents adequate parking distribution, and thus meets OVZCR standards for parking lot configuration. 3. Additional architectural treatments shall be incorporated into the building designs in order to visually diminish the mass of buildings over 60,000 square feet. 4. Enhanced vegetation and architectural screening shall be implemented where retail loading zones are oriented toward residential. Part I – Land Uses Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 58 vi. Parcel K– Low Density Residential a. Parcel sizes: Parcel K is 27.4± acres. b. Underlying zoning district: R1-7, Single Family Residential. R1-7 standards shall apply except as modified herein. c. Open space shall be provided in accordance with Part II – Environmentally Sensitive Lands. d. Modifications to underlying zoning district: i. Permitted and Prohibited Uses 1. Maximum gross residential density is 2 homes per acre (55 units). ii. Development Standards 1. Minimum lot size is 6,600 square feet. 2. Minimum side setback is 5 feet. 3. Minimum front setback is 5 feet for side-entry garages, 10 feet for non-garage areas of the home, and 20 feet for front-facing garages. In no instance shall a driveway length of less than 20 feet be provided. 4. Maximum building height shall be 20 feet and 1-story. 5. Perimeter bufferyards with enhanced vegetation, as defined in Section I-2-F, Landscape, Buffering and Screening shall be installed along the entire eastern edge of the 200-foot natural open space area adjacent to existing residences. The intent of this enhanced bufferyard is to fill any significant gaps in the native tree canopy within the 200-foot natural open space area, as viewed from the existing residences to the west. The enhanced bufferyard shall meet the Town’s 10-foot Bufferyard ‘A’ requirements except that plant densities may be reduced where they would create overplanting and water waste in the opinion of the Planning and Zoning Administrator. Part I – Land Uses Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 60 vii. Parcel L – Low Density Residential / Casas Campus Expansion a. Parcel sizes: Parcel L is 21.0± acres. b. Underlying zoning district: R1-7, Single Family Residential. R1-7 standards shall apply except as modified herein. c. Open space shall be provided in accordance with Part II – Environmentally Sensitive Lands. d. Modifications to underlying zoning district: i. Permitted and Prohibited Uses 1. Maximum gross residential density is 2 homes per acre (42 units). 2. Expansions of the Casas Church/Casas Christian School campus shall be allowed. ii. Development Standards 1. Minimum lot size is 6,600 square feet. 2. Minimum side setback is 5 feet. 3. Minimum front setback is 5 feet for side-entry garages, 10 feet for non-garage areas of the home, and 20 feet for front-facing garages. In no instance shall a driveway length of less than 20 feet be provided. 4. Maximum building height shall be 28 feet and 2 stories, except for within the area noted on Exhibit I-2-C: Proposed Land Use Plan where the maximum building height is 20 feet and 1-story for residential uses and 25 feet for Casas Church / Casas Christian School Expansion. 5. Perimeter bufferyards with enhanced vegetation shall be installed along the entire eastern edge of the 200-foot natural open space area adjacent to existing residences. The intent of this enhanced bufferyard is to fill any significant gaps in the native tree canopy within the 200-foot natural open space area, as viewed from the existing residences to the west. The enhanced bufferyard shall meet the Town’s 10-foot Bufferyard ‘A’ requirements except that plant densities may be reduced where they would create overplanting and water waste in the opinion of the Planning and Zoning Administrator. Part I – Land Uses Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 63 viii. Parcel M – Low Density Residential a. Parcel sizes: Parcel M is 24.0± acres. b. Underlying zoning district: R1-7, Single Family Residential. R1-7 standards shall apply except as modified herein. c. Open space shall be provided in accordance with Part II – Environmentally Sensitive Lands. d. Modifications to underlying zoning district: i. Permitted and Prohibited Uses 1. Maximum gross residential density is 2 homes per acre (48 units). ii. Development Standards 1. Minimum lot size is 6,600 square feet. 2. Minimum side setback is 5 feet. 3. Minimum front setback is 5 feet for side-entry garages, 10 feet for non-garage areas of the home, and 20 feet for front-facing garages. In no instance shall a driveway length of less than 20 feet be provided. 4. Maximum building height shall be 28 feet and 2 stories. 5. Perimeter bufferyards with enhanced vegetation, as defined in Section I-2-F, Landscape, Buffering and Screening shall be installed along the entire eastern edge of the 200-foot natural open space area adjacent to existing residences. The intent of this enhanced bufferyard is to fill any significant gaps in the native tree canopy within the 200-foot natural open space area, as viewed from the existing residences to the west. The enhanced bufferyard shall meet the Town’s 10-foot Bufferyard ‘A’ requirements except that plant densities may be reduced where they would create overplanting and water waste in the opinion of the Planning and Zoning Administrator. Part I – Land Uses Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 65 F. Open Space & Recreation Concept The open space system within Capella establishes a master plan for providing the amount of open space required by the Environmentally Sensitive Lands Ordinance in a way that meets conservation priorities for sensitive areas, ensures development flexibility, maintains connectivity of natural systems, includes pedestrian circulation where appropriate, and allocates the open space where it is most beneficial. Capella will exceed the Town’s PAD ordinance requirement of 20% open space. This standard will be exceeded through several design components: three dedicated community recreation areas, additional open space areas within each development parcel, riparian and wash area preservation, and open space buffers, all contributing to overall open space within Capella of approximately 30%. The community design includes three recreation areas, Parcels C, F, and G, representing 9.5 acres of open space and park land. Two of these recreation areas, Parcels C and G will provide ‘windows’ of open space to the travelling public on La Cholla Boulevard, as well as pedestrian and bicycle path connection points. Smaller recreation areas may be constructed within individual development parcels, but are not required due to the fact that the 9.5 acres of recreation areas within Parcels C, F, and G already exceed the Town minimum of 1 acre of recreation area per 85 units (which would require 6.7 acres for the 570 residential units allowed within the PAD if built to the maximum density). Consistent with Oro Valley land use practices, all riparian areas of the property will be permanently protected open space (except for minor crossings as necessary). In accordance with one of the General Plan policies specific to Capella, a 200-foot wide open space buffer has been provided along much of the western edge of Capella. i. Types of Open Space The open space within Capella will consist of recreation areas, enhanced natural and landscaped bufferyards, floodways, floodplains, Critical Resource Areas, certain Resource Management Areas, other natural open space areas such as on-lot open space, and landscaped common areas and streetscapes. Formal categories of open space will include Critical Resource Area ESOS, Resource Management Area ESOS, and Landscaped Open Space. ii. Percentages by Type and Amounts of Open Space Please refer to Exhibit II-2-A: ESOS Plan for a summary of the types and amounts of natural and landscaped open space in the Capella PAD. Part I – Land Uses Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 66 iii. Treatments and Purposes of Open Space Open space within Capella will generally fall into one of two broad categories: Natural Open Space Functional Open Space Floodways/Floodplains Recreation Areas Critical Resource Areas Manicured Common Areas Resource Mgmt. Areas (not Recreational) Buffer Areas On-Lot Open Space (within lots ½-acre and larger) Natural open space (within both Critical Resource Areas and Resource Management Areas) will be protected during development from disturbance and in perpetuity from encroachment and non- permitted uses. Private restrictions and common ownership will provide necessary legal protections for natural open space areas. The purpose of natural open space areas is to maintain the landscape character, preserve environmentally sensitive areas, and maintain landscape connections and habitat viability. Limited recreational activities will be permitted in natural open space areas. Functional open space is composed of recreational and outdoor living areas and landscaped areas associated with residential and non-residential development projects. Functional open space areas serve to buffer and screen specific uses and structures, provide separation, maintain landscape continuity, provide active and passive recreation areas for residents, visitors and pets. iv. Ownership of Open Space All open space areas except on-lot open space will be owned and maintained by the Capella Master HOA and/or a sub-HOA within Capella. In low density areas, portions of large lots may be deed restricted to natural open space use only in accordance with the Town’s ESL provisions. Landscaped areas within the commercial parcels will be privately maintained. Part I – Land Uses Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 67 G. Landscape, Buffering, and Screening i. Landscape Concept Capella’s landscape concept is to conserve and enhance the native, drought tolerant plant palette that exists on the property today. Capella, like many areas in Oro Valley, has a diverse palette of Sonoran Desert vegetation including cactus, desert shrubs, and trees on the site. The philosophy of the PAD is to ensure this diversity and quality of plant materials exist in perpetuity over a significant portion of the property. The Capella PAD is intended to be consistent with the General Plan and the Town’s Landscape Conservation standards. The standards herein are intended to preserve land values, preserve environmental quality, promote water conservation, enhance site design, and improve living quality for residents and visitors. Plant materials play an important role in buffering, screening and blending development into the landscape. A few portions of the property are more visually sensitive than other areas, including frontages along La Cholla Boulevard and Lambert Lane. All PAD ‘edge’ areas where residential development is proposed shall be treated with landscape bufferyards per Town Code. Balancing screening and buffering needs with water conservation is important. Landscape irrigation is the largest consumer of domestic water in Oro Valley. Primarily utilizing drought tolerant plant materials along with temporary irrigation is an important component of water conservation for the project. All PAD landscape standards are intended to be consistent with the Town’s Landscape Conservation standards (OVZCR 27.6). ii. Plant Palette The Town of Oro Valley already has thoughtful and responsible regulations specifying allowable drought tolerant plant material that may be used in landscape installations. Development within Capella shall adhere to the standard O.V. plant palette. iii. Native Plant Preservation, Salvage and Mitigation The preservation, salvage and mitigation standards of the Oro Valley Zoning Code shall apply. Part I – Land Uses Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 68 iv. Bufferyards & Screening Development within Capella is subject to the Town’s standard landscape bufferyard and screening requirements, OVZCR 27.6.C, except as noted in Section I-2-D: Development Criteria by Parcel, where additional buffering requirements will apply to specific parcels and specific uses. To provide more robust screening in certain PAD perimeter areas, those standards typically require enhanced buffering as defined below. Modifications to Buffer Yard and Screening Standards: a. Non-paved trails shall be allowed within bufferyard areas except in the 200 foot buffer along the western edge of the PAD. b. Enhanced Vegetative Screening 1. In specific areas of the PAD as noted in the development standards for each Parcel, enhanced vegetative screening is required in accordance with General Plan Special Area Policy #17 (See Exhibit 1-2-B: Adopted General Plan Ordinance). 2. Large available specimens of native vegetation salvaged from the site shall be placed in enhanced bufferyard areas. Nursery specimens may be substituted as approved by the Planning and Zoning Administrator, if an insufficient number of mature, salvageable, native trees are available within the PAD. LA CHOLLA BLVD.LAMBERT LANE NARANJA DR.CANADA HILLS DR. Single-Story within 300' of Perimeter Single-Story Only Single-Story within 300' of Perimeter B C-1 12.2± Ac. E CCE / MDR / HDR 19.0± Ac. M LDR 24.0± Ac. L CCE / LDR 21.0± Ac. K LDR 27.4± Ac. H MDR 52.8± Ac. J C-1 18.9± Ac. A C-N 8.2± Ac. D MDR / HDR 14.0± Ac. C Rec. 2.1± Ac. 200' NATURAL OPEN SPACE BUFFER CROSS ROAD F Rec. 3.6± Ac. G Rec. 3.8± Ac. Exhibit I-2-F Proposed Landscape & Bufferyard Plan Q:\110028\A-003 - PAD\01 Planning\04 PAD\PAD Document\Exhibits\EXHIBIT 1-2-F - Landscape & Bufferyard Plan.dwg Plotted: Feb. 04, 2018Inc. Group The WLB 800'0' Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-00369 LEGEND BUFFERYARD 'A' BUFFERYARD 'B' SINGLE-STORY HEIGHT RESTRICTION PRIMARY ENTRY LOCATION SECONDARY ENTRY LOCATION NOTE ·All bufferyards will meet the requirements of the Oro Valley Zoning Code section 27.6.C.4 ·Please refer to individual Tentative Development Plans for general landscaping configuration. Part I – Land Uses Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 70 H. Thematic Imagery The following pages showcase examples of landscaping, site lighting, construction materials, pedestrian elements, entries & monumentation, courtyards, architectural details & fenestration that represent the general styles and aesthetics envisioned for the most visible elements within Capella. The examples are intended to serve as illustrations of the design aesthetics envisioned and do not indicate specific design approval. The Capella Master HOA shall refer to these images and the Town’s Design Guidelines for guidance when reviewing development proposals within the PAD. Inc. Group The WLB 78Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 (This page intentionally blank) Part II – Environmentally Sensitive Lands Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 79 Part II – Environmentally Sensitive Lands Part II – Environmentally Sensitive Lands Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 80 (This page intentionally blank) Part II – Environmentally Sensitive Lands Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 81 1. Existing Conditions A. ESL Categories Onsite i. Discussion Two ESL conservation categories are present at Capella: Resource Management Area Tier 2 (RMA) and Critical Resource Area (CRA). There are no Major Wildlife Linkages or Core Resource Areas within Capella. Critical Resource Areas that occur onsite generally encompass the washes that cross the property. The balance of Capella is designated as Resource Management Area Tier 2 with the exception of a small area in Parcel L that is already developed. Approximately 6.9 acres of existing roadway areas are incorrectly designated as ESOS on the existing Town ESOS map. ii. Total acreage present on-site for each Conservation Category. Conservation Category Acreage Major Wildlife Linkage 0 Critical Resource Area 36.5 Core Resource Area 0 RMA Tier 1 0 RMA Tier 2 156.4 RMA Tier 3 0 Existing Roadways designated as ESOS 6.9 Please refer to Exhibit II-1-A: Environmentally Sensitive Lands for the location of CRA and RMA areas in Capella. B. Additional ESL Characteristics i. Critical Resource Areas a. There are no Major Rock Outcrops and boulders that meet criteria in OVZCR Section 27.10.D.3.b.iii.b located on the property. b. There are no “Distinct Habitat Resources”, as defined in OVZCR Section 27.10D.3.b.iii.c. ii. Core Resource Areas a. There are no Distinctive Native Plant Stands, as defined in OVZCR Section 27.10.3.d.iii.d. iii. Resource Management Areas (Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3) a. If any Distinctive Individual Native Plants, as defined in OVZCR Section 27.10.3.d.iii.d are found on the property, they will be protected in accordance with ESL standards. b. There are no Minor Rock Outcrops and Boulders, as defined in OVZCR Section 27.10.3.d.iii.d. Part II – Environmentally Sensitive Lands Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 82 2. PAD Response A. Environmentally Sensitive Open Space (ESOS) Exhibit II-2-A: ESOS Plan shows the overall Environmentally Sensitive Open Space (ESOS) plan for the entire PAD. In addition to the ESOS encompassing the recreation areas, ESOS will be designated as each of the PAD parcels is planned and platted for development. While the PAD provides for some flexibility in locating ESOS, all minimum amounts of ESOS will be provided in larger community-serving areas along and including the major washes, an undisturbed open space buffer along the west edge of Capella and within the design for each site. Table II-2-B-1: ESOS Calculations lists the total existing and proposed ESOS acreages within the Capella PAD. B. ESOS Selection, Priority Resources, and Selection Criteria In accordance with the General Plan and ESLO, the most sensitive resources on the site will receive the greatest level of protection. Desert wash areas are vital resources in several ways. The associated riparian areas are biologically diverse, providing wildlife habit and important movement corridors and connectivity for various wildlife species. These areas have the greatest priority among the resources existing on the property. Consistent with the General Plan and ESL standards, the Capella PAD provides for permanent protection of no less than 95 percent of the Critical Resource Areas (CRA) on the property. This is accomplished by incorporating CRA’s into Environmentally Sensitive Open Space or ‘ESOS’ that becomes community or neighborhood association common area or is dedicated to the Town. CRA areas will only be disturbed for crossing purposes such as roads, trails, and utilities. There are no Major Wildlife Linkage or Core Resource Areas within Capella. ESOS within the PAD will be permanently preserved in accordance with ESL standards. Ownership and maintenance of ESOS areas which incorporate the RMA and CRA lands to be preserved will be by homeowners’ association, except on- lot ESOS, which will be established by individual final plats. ESL standards in OVZCR Section 27.10.E.4.d provide criteria for selecting which portions of the CRA and RMA areas will be preserved. Capella’s open space plan meets ESOS selection criteria in the following ways: 1. With the exception of access, trail, and utility crossings, all areas of CRA that create biological connectivity, specifically four wash corridors the traverse the property from north to south, are permanently preserved as ESOS (see Exhibit II-2-A: ESOS Plan). 2. Within the RMA Tier 2 areas a variety of upland and lowland areas will be preserved on the site, particularly along Capella’s western edge. 3. Disturbance areas have been selected to avoid the areas of greatest resource density. In Capella these areas are the central ribbons of CRA along the wash corridors. 4. Healthy and viable resources are somewhat uniformly distributed across CRA and RMA areas found on the property. No distinct priority was required to meet this criteria. Part II – Environmentally Sensitive Lands Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 83 5. The site does not contain rock outcrops and boulders, therefore related criteria did not apply. Exhibit II-2-A: ESOS Plan indicates graphically where proposed ESOS maintains open space connectivity within and beyond the Capella property. There are four main corridor areas preserved on the site. C. Methods of Permanent ESOS Protection All ESOS lands will be permanently protected per ESL standards by being under the ownership and control of the HOA in accordance with OVZCR Section 27.10.E.2 or within conservation easements on private lots. D. ESOS Protection Any Resource Management Area (RMA) ESOS or Critical Resource Management (CRA) ESOS setback requirements, per OVZCR Section 27.10.D.3.f.3.b. shall apply and are modified as follows: 1. ESOS setbacks shall be 5 feet to all site improvements. In lieu of standard fencing required by the ESOS setback ordinance, special setback mitigation can be used, i.e. boulders or other protective barrier as approved by the Planning & Zoning Administrator. If mitigated to resemble the natural conditions, the setback area shall count toward required RMA ESOS. E. ESOS Location Concept and Flexibility 1. The Capella PAD provides for flexibility in the location of required ESOS. The community is planned in a series of Parcels. ESOS minimum standards will apply to each Parcel as it gains site plan approval from the Town. Capella uses a master planned approach to ensure as much open space consolidation as practical. This concept is consistent with the ESL standards and the Town’s General Plan. To this end, the Capella PAD meets ESOS requirements. 2. Exhibit II-2-A: ESOS Plan shows the location of planned ESOS in Capella. This systematic design will leave some Parcels exceeding minimum ESOS standards and other Parcels deficient. The PAD permits these deficiencies as long as the overall ESOS minimums are met for the PAD as a whole. This approach provides for greater consolidation of ESOS, and more infrastructural responsible land utilization of less sensitive portions of the PAD. 3. Individual parcel site plan applications may include designs that provide less than the minimum required RMA ESOS as established by the ESL standards and the standards of the Capella PAD. Such site plans shall include ESOS tabulations that demonstrate minimum standards for the Capella community are satisfied. The Planning and Zoning Administrator may establish the format of information and administrative provisions to ensure minimum ESOS is and will be provided. An updated version of Table II-2-B-1: ESOS Calculations shall be provided with each CSP submittal within the PAD in order to keep a running tabulation of ESOS provided. 4. Excess Critical Resource Area ESOS may be credited toward required Resource Management Area ESOS. Site plan applications shall include a tabulation of ESOS types and the amount of area to be credited and is subject to approval of the site plan by the Town. CASAS CHURCH NARANJA DR. IRONWOOD RIDGE HIGH SCHOOL LA CHOLLA BLVD. LAMBERT LN. Exhibit II-1-A Environmentally Sensitive Lands Q:\110028\A-003 - PAD\01 Planning\04 PAD\PAD Document\Exhibits\EXHIBIT 2-1-A - Existing ESOS.dwg Plotted: Sep. 29, 2017Inc. Group The WLB 800'0' Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-00384 ON-SITE ESL CATEGORIES: CRITICAL RESOURCE AREA (36.5± ACRES) CORE RESOURCE AREA (NONE ONSITE) RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AREA TIER 2 (156.4± ACRES) NON ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE LANDS (7.2± ACRES) RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AREA TIER 1 (NONE ONSITE) EXISTING ROADWAYS INCORRECTLY DESIGNATED AS ESOS (6.9± ACRES) Inc. Group The WLB 87Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 (This page intentionally blank) Part III –Topography Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 88 Part III – Topography Part III –Topography Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 89 (This page intentionally blank) Part III –Topography Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 90 1. Existing Conditions The topography of Capella is characterized by gentle slopes with low ridges between the lower lying wash areas that drain the property. The property generally slopes downward from north to south towards Lambert Lane. Elevations range from approximately 2,700 feet at the highest point on the north side to 2,586 feet at the lowest point on the south side of the property, which equates to an average slope of approximately 2%. Two braided washes traverse the site, creating low ridgelines. The site does not contain any restricted peaks or ridges, regulated slopes, rock outcrops, or other significant topographic features. No areas of this development are subject to the ESL Hillside Area Category. Please refer to Exhibit III-1-A: Topography. A sloped area analysis meeting ESL Hillside Area requirements (Section 27.10.D.3.g.ii), has been prepared by a State of Arizona licensed and registered engineer. The results of that analysis reveals there are no areas of the property subject to ESL Hillside regulations. 2. PAD Response The land use plan for the Capella PAD is designed to maximize the use of the most topographically suitable areas of the property and minimize impacts to areas of drainage and drainage features such as wash banks. There are no significant topographic constraints on the property. There were no significant slopes identified in the slope analysis, hence no encroachment will occur. There are no Hillside Conservation areas in Capella. Riparian areas and natural desert buffers will not be graded or disturbed except for road, trail, and utility crossings and supplemental landscape installation as specified in Section I-2-D: Development Criteria by Parcel. Approximately 35 of Capella’s 207 acres will remain undisturbed and ungraded. Roughly 170 acres of the property may be disturbed or graded. Disturbed areas that do not receive structural or hardscape improvements will be landscaped or revegetated. Please refer to Exhibit III-2-A: Proposed Grading Limits. LA CHOLLA BLVD.LAMBERT LANE NARANJA DR.CANADA HILLS DR. B C-1 12.2± Ac. D MDR / HDR 14.0± Ac. E CCE / MDR / HDR 19.0± Ac. M LDR 24.0± Ac. F Rec. 3.6± Ac. L CCE / LDR 21.0± Ac. K LDR 27.4± Ac. H MDR 52.8± Ac. J C-1 18.9± Ac. A C-N 8.2± Ac. G Rec. 3.8± Ac.CROSS ROADC Rec. 2.1± Ac. Exhibit III-2-A Proposed Grading Limits Q:\110028\A-003 - PAD\01 Planning\04 PAD\PAD Document\Exhibits\EXHIBIT 3-2-A - Proposed Grading Limits.dwg Plotted: Feb. 04, 2018Inc. Group The WLB 800'0' Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-00392 LEGEND PARCEL BOUNDARY PROPOSED GRADING LIMITS NOTES ·Proposed roadway alignments are schematic and subject to adjustment. ·Add'l grading may occur for roadway, trail, and utility crossings, as necessary. ·Refer to Table II-2-B-1 for parcel-by-parcel ESOS requirements. Part III –Topography Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 93 (This page intentionally blank) Part IV – Cultural/Archaeological/Historic Resources Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 94 Part IV – Cultural / Archaeological / Historic Resources Part IV – Cultural/Archaeological/Historic Resources Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 95 (This page intentionally blank) Part IV – Cultural/Archaeological/Historic Resources Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 96 1. Existing Conditions A. A report from either the Arizona State Museum (ASM), the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), a qualified archaeologist working under a State Antiquities Permit, or a professional architect that reviews all of the available information for the site. This report shall: i. Determine whether the site has been field surveyed for cultural resources. The site has been surveyed for cultural resources by SWCA, and the report has been submitted to the Town for review. ii. Identify any previously recorded archaeological or historic resources known to exist on the property. There are no previously recorded archaeological or cultural resources known to exist on the property. The site does have a roadside memorial that will either remain in place or be sensitively relocated in accordance with the recommendations in the aforementioned cultural resources survey. iii. State the probability that buried archaeological resources not visible from the surface would be discovered on the site. The probability that archaeological resources exist below the surface of the ground is believed to be low. As with all development projects, if buried resources are discovered, work in the area will cease until a professional archaeologist can evaluate the find. B. Cultural Resources Survey and Inventory Report prepared by a Cultural Resources Professional as required by Section 27.10.D.3.e., that includes identification and mapping of: i. Cultural resources that are significant based on Local Criteria. None. ii. Cultural resources that are significant based on the National Register Criteria. None. Part IV – Cultural/Archaeological/Historic Resources Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 97 C. Description of resource, recommendation of significance, supporting documentation for recommendation, and summary of all background research and source references. The aforementioned cultural resources report by SWCA provides the following summary recommendations: “An archaeological survey of the project area resulted in the identification of three isolated occurrences (“IOs”) and no previously or newly identified archaeological sites. IO #1 is a prehistoric manifestation and consists of a plain ware ceramic and a tested cobble; IO #2 is a historic manifestation and consists of two steel-sided, aluminum-topped, pull-tab beverage cans; and IO #3 is a roadside memorial. The IOs do not meet Arizona State Museum (“ASM”) site criteria and therefore a recommended ineligible for listing in the Arizona Register of Historic Places (“ARHP”). However, because of the sensitive nature of the roadside memorial (IO #3), it should be avoided out of respect for the family of the deceased. If avoidance is not possible, an attempt to identify the family should be made by consulting the Oro Valley Police Department, so that a plan to more the memorial can be developed. SWCA recommends that this project will have a finding of no historic properties affected. No further archaeological work is recommended for the project area. However, if previously undocumented buried cultural resources are identified during ground-disturbing activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the discovery should stop until the find can be evaluated by a professional archaeologist. In the even that human remains and/or funerary items are discovered, Arizona Revised Statues 41-865 require that the ASM be notified of the discovery so that the groups who claim cultural or religious affinity to them can make appropriate arrangements for the repatriation and reburial of the remains.” D. If resources are determined to be significant, provide a Treatment Plan, in accordance with Section 27.10.D.3.e.v.f., shall be approved prior to consideration by Town Council. Not applicable. Part IV – Cultural/Archaeological/Historic Resources Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 98 2. PAD Response A. Describe measures to be used for protection of all cultural and historical resources on the site. A survey of the property was conducted by a qualified archaeologist. No previously or newly identified archeological sites were identified. As such, no measures are necessary to protect cultural and historical resources. If resources are discovered during site development, a professional archaeologist will evaluate the newly discovered resources to determine appropriate actions. If human remains are and/or funerary items are discovered, the Arizona State Museum will be notified so appropriate groups can be notified to make arrangements for the appropriate and sensitive repatriation and reburial of the remains. B. If resources identified in Part 1 – Cultural/Archaeological/Historic Resources are determined to be significant, provide a Treatment Plan in accordance with Section 27.10.D.3.e.v.f. No significant cultural or historic resources are known to occur on the site with the exception of a roadside memorial. If avoidance of the memorial is not possible, an attempt to identify the family will be made by contacting Oro Valley Police Department, so a plan to move the memorial can be prepared. Part IV – Cultural/Archaeological/Historic Resources Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 99 (This page intentionally blank) Part V –Hydrology Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 100 Part V – Hydrology Part V –Hydrology Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 101 (This page intentionally blank) Part V –Hydrology Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 102 1. Existing Conditions A. Offsite Watersheds The off-site watersheds impacting the project site are sub-watersheds of the La Cholla Wash, which is a medium sized, braided wash typical of the broader Tortolita Fan area. Two tributaries of the La Cholla Wash impact the project site along the eastern and western property boundaries. The eastern of the two tributaries, Cross Wash, is designated as Zone A per the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), Panel 04019C1070L, revised June 16, 2011. The majority and remainder of the property is designated as Zone ‘X’. The off-site terrain of the upstream watersheds is a mix of native desert vegetation and residential development including a number of roadway crossings. The development in the upstream area appears to provide little, or no, detention, which is typical of older or unplanned development. Please refer to Exhibit V-1-A: Offsite Watersheds. B. Balanced and Critical Basins. The entire Town is classified as a critical basin. C. Significant Offsite Features Affecting the Site Upstream of the site, the low density nature of existing development allows most drainage to flow naturally. The site is impacted by approximately 450 cfs, 590 cfs, and 825 cfs from tributaries of the La Cholla Wash, respectively. D. Area of Offsite Watersheds Discharging >100 CFS The portion of the La Cholla Wash watershed that impacts the site is of approximately 790 acres. E. Wells within 100’ According to the Arizona Department of Water Resources, there are no wells located within 100 feet of the project site. F. Characteristics of Onsite Hydrology Shallow, braided washes run along the eastern and western edges of Capella. The bulk of the area between the two washes is typical of the upland desert biome, featuring a mix of cactus, mesquites, palo verde, and other species. Pima County GIS data describes the soils as a mixed hydrological soil group. Onsite hydrologic analysis has been performed with the Rational Method. The runoff coefficients were prepared using the Town of Oro Valley Drainage Criteria Manual, and are based on soil types noted in the National Resource Conservation Service soils study. The hydrologic soil type within the project boundary is comprised of 53% ‘C’ / 47% ‘D’. The vegetative cover and density have been determined using recent aerial photographs and field reconnaissance. The rainfall data was determined using the Generalized I-D-F Curves as found within Figure 3-3 of the TOV Drainage Criteria Manual. Please refer to Exhibit V-1-F: Onsite Hydrology Characteristics. Part V –Hydrology Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 103 i. Approximate 100-year floodplains with discharges equal to or greater than 50 cfs. The project site contains three sub-basins with greater than 50 cfs discharge. ii. Areas of sheet flooding, with average depths The project site is not subject to sheet flooding based on the incised channel characteristics. iii. Federally mapped floodways and floodplains In the southeastern corner of the property FEMA has designated the Cross Wash as Zone A per FIRM Panel: 04019C1070L. iv. Calculation of all 100-year peak discharges exceeding 50 cfs Please refer to Exhibit H: Onsite Hydrology Characteristics G. Drainage Conditions along the Downstream Property Boundary Lambert Lane forms the downstream property boundary of the Capella PAD. Lambert Lane includes several at-grade wash crossings that are subject to sedimentation during major storm events, typically requiring Town maintenance crews to remove sand and other debris several times per monsoon season. Erosion and regional channel down-cutting are longstanding problems in this area of Town. At the time of this writing, the Town does not have plans to improve Lambert Lane. 2. PAD Response The site layout will impact hydrologic characteristics such as impervious cover and minor floodplain encroachment. Erosion control measures will be incorporated into the design for areas of encroachment into floodplains. As a result of increased impervious cover, detention basins will be constructed to detain the increased flows, and will feature outlet structures (weirs, culverts and/or catch basins) to discharge the basins as a metered flow rate no greater than existing conditions peak stormwater runoff rate. Detention basins will be spread throughout the development so as to minimize their visual impact. Provision of adequate basin access and maintenance shall be addressed during the detailed design phases of development. In-line detention is not proposed as part of this project. Where roadway crossings are proposed, culverts or bridges will be employed to convey stormwater past the crossings. The project will address not only onsite flows that will be produced by the increase in impervious surfaces, but also the flows entering the site from the north and east. The project will be designed to avoid negatively impacting upstream and downstream properties. All drainage improvements proposed outside of public right-of-way within this development will be owned and maintained by the HOA. Drainage design will be in accordance with the Town’s Drainage Criteria Manual and Floodplain Ordinance. During the detailed engineering design phase of each parcel, the developer will work closely with Town staff to identify ways to minimize erosion and channel down-cutting. NARANJA DR.LA CHOLLA BLVD.CASAS CHURCH (NOT A PART)CANADA HILLS DR.ESTATES AT CAPELLA (NOT A PART) LAMBERT LN. Exhibit V-2-A Proposed Hydrology Plan Q:\110028\A-003 - PAD\01 Planning\04 PAD\PAD Document\Exhibits\EXHIBIT 5-2-A - Proposed Hydro.dwg Plotted: Feb. 04, 2018Inc. Group The WLB 800'0' Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003106 D D DD D D D D D D D D D D D D LEGEND APPROX.BASIN LOCATION PROPOSED 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN D Part V –Hydrology Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 107 (This page intentionally blank) Part VI –Wildlife Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 108 Part VI – Wildlife Part VI –Wildlife Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 109 (This page intentionally blank) Part VI –Wildlife Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 110 1. Existing Conditions A. A letter from an Arizona Game and Fish Department habitat specialist regarding the following: A detailed response letter, dated 9/29/2015 was received from the Arizona Game and Fish Department. Please refer to Exhibit VI-1-A: AZGFD Letter. i. Presence of any State listed Threatened or Endangered Species While no record exists of special status species on the property a range of species are known to occur within three miles of the property. The Desert Tortoise is the only special status species specifically cited in the AZGFD response letter. ii. High densities of a given species population or unusually high diversity of species Neither high densities nor a particular diversity of species were noted in by AZGFD. iii. Aquatic or riparian ecosystems No aquatic or riparian ecosystems were noted in the AZFGD response. The property does contain riparian habitat. 2. PAD Response A. Describe and map steps to be taken to mitigate destruction of wildlife habitat identified in the previous Section. Riparian habitat areas will be protected during site construction phases in accordance with Town protocols. Riparian habitat areas will be preserved in accordance with ESL and PAD standards. Unbuilt areas disturbed during construction will be revegetated. If disturbance exceeds allowable limits, acceptable mitigation will be completed in accordance with the ESL Mitigation requirements (OVZCR Section 27-10.G). To maintain habitat viability, the Capella land use plan preserves habitat connectivity by permanently preserving the primary wash corridors on site which serve as movement corridors for wildlife. Desert tortoise was noted as commonly found in the area. If desert tortoises are encountered during site development, all specimens shall be handled in accordance with AZGFD handling guidelines. Part VI –Wildlife Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 111 Exhibit VI-1-A: AZGFD Letter Part VI –Wildlife Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 112 Exhibit VI-1-A: AZGFD Letter (cont’d) Part VI –Wildlife Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 113 Exhibit VI-1-A: AZGFD Letter (cont’d) Part VI –Wildlife Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 114 Exhibit VI-1-A: AZGFD Letter (cont’d) Part VI –Wildlife Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 115 Exhibit VI-1-A: AZGFD Letter (cont’d) Part VI –Wildlife Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 116 Exhibit VI-1-A: AZGFD Letter (cont’d) Part VI –Wildlife Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 117 Exhibit VI-1-A: AZGFD Letter (cont’d) Part VI –Wildlife Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 118 Exhibit VI-1-A: AZGFD Letter (cont’d) Part VI –Wildlife Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 119 Exhibit VI-1-A: AZGFD Letter (cont’d) Part VI –Wildlife Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 120 Exhibit VI-1-A: AZGFD Letter (cont’d) Part VI –Wildlife Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 121 Exhibit VI-1-A: AZGFD Letter (cont’d) Part VII –Viewsheds Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 122 Part VII – Viewsheds Part VII –Viewsheds Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 123 (This page intentionally blank) Part VII –Viewsheds Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 124 1. Existing Conditions Due to the relatively flat character of the vicinity, the perimeter areas of Capella are the only locations of high visibility from adjacent roadways and properties. Higher vegetation densities in the western and eastern portions of the site reduce visibility into and across the property. A. For proposals within the Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District and/or Oracle Road Scenic Corridor Overlay District, provide a Viewshed Analysis as defined in Section 27.10.D.3.f.iv.a.1. Capella does not fall within either Overlay district. B. For proposals within the Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District and/or Oracle Road Scenic Corridor Overlay District, provide a View Preservation Plan (VPP) for nonresidential developments that meet the criteria defined in Section 27.10.D.3.f.iv.2. Not Applicable. C. For proposals within the Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District and/or Oracle Road Scenic Corridor Overlay District, map and identify all Core Character Vegetation (CCV), in accordance with Section 27.10.D.3.f.iv.b. Not Applicable. Part VII –Viewsheds Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 125 2. PAD Response A. Describe and map how the Tentative Development Plan mitigates impacts to: i. Views and vistas from off-site / Areas of High Visibility Development in Capella will provide open space and landscaped area buffers along all perimeter areas. In specified areas, enhanced bufferyards will be provided that include larger plant specimens intended to mitigate views of homes and others to be developed at Capella. Areas disturbed during construction that are not part of building pads and circulation improvements (driveways, parking, sidewalks, and more) will be revegetated to Town standards. Setbacks further serve to mitigate visual impacts of structures. The land plan for Capella provides two recreation areas along La Cholla Boulevard. These areas serve to provide ‘windows’ of open space when viewing from off-site. It should be noted no unusual or excessive uses or structures are planned at Capella. The large majority of noticeable visual impact will be the construction of one and two story homes and neighborhood or community scale commercial uses, which is completely consistent with the areas of Oro Valley near Capella, creating a compatible and consistent viewshed from off-site areas. ii. Describe and diagram methods for roadway construction in a matter compatible with the natural terrain, and how scarring is to be mitigated at the completion of construction. Previous decades of development have helped the Town develop effective methods to guide roadway construction to minimize scarring and provide for restoration of disturbed right-of-way areas along roadway edges. Capella will utilize Town standards to minimize construction impacts. Among the techniques to be employed is providing effective erosion control along with reseeding and revegetation of disturbed areas. Additionally, minimal construction zones will be maintained using Town-accepted methods of demarcation of construction/disturbance limits. LA CHOLLA BLVD.LAMBERT LANE NARANJA DR.CANADA HILLS DR. Ironwood Ridge High School Canada Hills Canada Hills La Cholla Estates Saguaros Viejos Estates at Capella Casas Church Chaparral Heights B C-1 12.2± Ac. D MDR / HDR 14.0± Ac. E CCE / MDR / HDR 19.0± Ac. M LDR 24.0± Ac. K LDR 27.4± Ac. H MDR 52.8± Ac. G Rec. 3.8± Ac. J C-1 18.9± Ac. A C-N 8.2± Ac. L CCE / LDR 21.0± Ac. C Rec. 2.1± Ac. B A CD F Rec. 3.6± Ac.E CROSS ROADExhibit VII-2-A Site Cross-Sections Key Map Q:\110028\A-003 - PAD\01 Planning\04 PAD\PAD Document\Exhibits\EXHIBIT 7-2-A - Site Cross-Section Key Map.dwg Plotted: Feb. 05, 2018Inc. Group The WLB 800'0' Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003126 LEGEND PARCEL BOUNDARY CROSS-SECTION LOCATIONX Part VII –Viewsheds Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 127 (This page intentionally blank) Inc. Group The WLB 133Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 (This page intentionally blank) Part VIII –Traffic Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 134 Part VIII – Traffic Part VIII –Traffic Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 135 (This page intentionally blank) Part VIII –Traffic Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 136 1. Existing Conditions The upcoming widening of La Cholla Boulevard not only will change the character of the area, but also will add significantly more roadway capacity in this part of Oro Valley. Southwest Traffic Engineering has prepared a Master Traffic Analysis for this proposed PAD. The analysis provides a comprehensive analysis of the existing and predicted traffic conditions in the area without the project so that Oro Valley staff can gain a better understanding of anticipated traffic volumes that’ll need to be accommodated even if the project were not to become a reality. Oro Valley staff identified twelve nearby arterial and / or collector road intersections to be included in the traffic analysis. The level of service (LOS) of various turning movements within the following intersections is expected to fall below the Town’s allowable limits even without the project: • Shannon Road & Lambert Lane beginning in 2020. • La Canada Drive & Lambert Lane beginning in 2025. • Lambert Lane & Cross Road beginning in 2030. • La Cholla Boulevard & Cross Road beginning in 2030. • Naranja Drive & La Canada Drive beginning in 2030. The Town of Oro Valley and the Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) already have several planned roadway improvements in the vicinity of Capella, including the widening of Tangerine Road from La Canada Drive to Interstate 10, the widening of La Cholla Boulevard north to Tangerine Road, and the widening of a portion of Lambert Lane between La Canada Drive and La Cholla Boulevard. In order to mitigate the expected low levels of service listed above, the analysis recommends that the Town construct several roadway improvements in order to accommodate expected traffic volumes not associated with Capella: • Additional turn lanes at the intersection of Shannon Road & Lambert Lane in 2020. • A traffic signal at the intersection of La Cholla Boulevard & Canada Hills Drive in 2020. • A traffic signal at the intersection of Shannon Road & Lambert Lane in 2025. • Additional turn lanes at the intersection of La Canada Drive & Lambert Lane. In 2025. • An additional turn lane at the intersection of La Canada Drive & Naranja Drive in 2030. La Cholla Boulevard Road Segment: Naranja Dr. to Tangerine Rd. Naranja Dr. to Lambert Lane Existing ROW: 150’ 60’ Ultimate ROW: 150’ 150’ Travel Lanes: 2 2 Capacity: 17,000 17,000 ADT (PAG): 8,723 7,366 Speed Limit: 45 45 Condition: Paved Paved Scheduled Improvements: Scheduled Scheduled Part VIII –Traffic Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 137 Naranja Drive Road Segment: Shannon to La Cholla La Cholla Blvd. to La Canada Existing ROW: 150’ 150’ Ultimate ROW: 150’ 150' Travel Lanes: 2 2 Capacity: 16,000 16,000 ADT (PAG): 5,098 7,714 Speed Limit: 35 45 Condition: Paved Paved Scheduled Improvements: None Scheduled None Scheduled Tangerine Road Road Segment: La Cholla to La Canada Thornydale to La Cholla Existing ROW: 200’ 200’ Ultimate ROW: 200’ 200’ Travel Lanes: 2 2 Capacity: 18,000 18,000 ADT (PAG): 16,029 15,829 Speed Limit: 45 45 Condition: Paved Paved Scheduled Improvements: In Progress In Progress Lambert Road Segment: Shannon Rd. to La Cholla Blvd. La Cholla Blvd. to La Canada Existing ROW: 150’ 150’ Ultimate ROW: 150’ 150' Travel Lanes: 2 2 Capacity: 12,000 12,000 ADT (PAG): 6,228 8,704 Speed Limit: 45 45 Condition: Paved Paved Scheduled Improvements: None Scheduled None Scheduled Shannon Road Segment: Naranja Drive. to Lambert Lane Lambert Lane to Overton Road Existing ROW: 150’ 150’ Ultimate ROW: 150’ 150’ Travel Lanes: 2 2 Capacity: 12,000 12,000 ADT (PAG): 2,805 4,798 Speed Limit: 45 45 Condition: Paved Paved Scheduled Improvements: None Scheduled None Scheduled Part VIII –Traffic Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 138 2. PAD Response The Southwest Traffic Engineering analysis also provides a comprehensive analysis of the predicted traffic conditions in the area with additional traffic volume expected to be generated by the project. The level of service (LOS) of various turning movements within the following intersections is expected to fall below the Town’s allowable limits due to additional traffic from Capella: • Lambert Lane & Cross Road beginning in 2025 (rather than in 2030 without the project). • La Cholla Boulevard & Cross Road beginning in 2025 (rather than in 2030 without the project). • Parcel J Northeast Access & La Cholla Boulevard beginning in 2020. • Parcel J Southeast Access onto La Cholla Boulevard beginning in 2025. • La Cholla Boulevard & Canada Hills Drive beginning in 2025. • La Cholla Boulevard & Double Eagle Drive beginning in 2025. • La Cholla Boulevard & Lambert Lane beginning in 2030. • Parcel B Access onto La Cholla Boulevard beginning in 2030. In order to mitigate the expected traffic flows generated by Capella, and taking into account the roadway improvements already planned by the Town and RTA, the analysis recommends that the developers of Capella widen Lambert Lane along the project’s frontage west of La Cholla Boulevard. The timing of Lambert Lane widening will be determined by future updates to the Master Traffic Impact Analysis as individual parcels within Capella develop. The Master Traffic Analysis shall be updated with the development of each parcel within the PAD, to determine any roadway improvements that may be necessary to mitigate each development’s actual traffic impacts. All streets will be designed to meet the Town’s Subdivision Street Standards, and are intended to be public unless gated. LAMBERT LANESHANNON RD.WAS H PEC O S W A Y LA CANADA DR.GLOVER RD. NARANJA DR. CANADA HILLS D R .LA CHOLLA BLVD.TANGERINE RD. DEL O R O CANADA1 MILE FROM PROJECT SITE 1 MILE FROM PROJECT SITE (PUBLIC)(PUBLIC)(PRIVATE)(PUBLIC)(PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC)(PUBLIC)(PUBLIC)CROSS RD.Exhibit VIII-1-A Transportation Q:\110028\A-003 - PAD\01 Planning\04 PAD\PAD Document\Exhibits\EXHIBIT 8-1-A - Existing Roadways.dwg Plotted: Feb. 05, 2018Inc. Group The WLB 2000'0' Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003139 LEGEND Existing Major Roads Existing Signalized Intersections LA CHOLLA BLVD.LAMBERT LANE NARANJA DR.CANADA HILLS DR. B C-1 12.2± Ac. D MDR / HDR 14.0± Ac. M LDR 24.0± Ac. F Rec. 3.6± Ac. L CCE / LDR 21.0± Ac. K LDR 27.4± Ac. H MDR 52.8± Ac. J C-1 18.9± Ac. A C-N 8.2± Ac.CROSS ROADFUTURE E CCE / MDR / HDR 19.0± Ac. G Rec. 3.8± Ac. C Rec. 2.1± Ac. CASAS CHURCH Exhibit VIII-2-A Proposed Trunk Infrastructure Plan - Roads Q:\110028\A-003 - PAD\01 Planning\04 PAD\PAD Document\Exhibits\EXHIBIT 8-2-A - Proposed Roadways.dwg Plotted: Feb. 05, 2018Inc. Group The WLB 800'0' Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003140 LEGEND EXISTING ARTERIAL ROADS EXISTING COLLECTOR ROADS PROPOSED COLLECTOR ROADS PROPOSED SCHEMATIC VEHICULAR CONNECTIONS NOTE ·Proposed roadway alignments are schematic and subject to adjustment. Part VIII –Traffic Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 141 (This page intentionally blank) Part IX –Recreation / Trails Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 142 Part IX – Recreation / Trails Part IX –Recreation / Trails Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 143 (This page intentionally blank) Part IX –Recreation / Trails Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 144 1. Existing Conditions A. Trails, Parks, and Recreation Areas within One Mile La Cholla Boulevard/La Cholla/Honey Bee Loop is shown as Trail #33 (a.k.a. Poppy Trail) on the Oro Valley Trails Plan. It is located along the west side of La Cholla Blvd., and is described in the plan as being intended to allow pedestrian, bicycle, and equestrian use. The trail provides access to the Canada Del Oro Riverfront Park, James D. Kriegh Park, and the Honey Bee Canyon Trailhead. The El Conquistador golf course is now owned by the Town of Oro Valley and is also considered a recreation center. Within two miles of Capella there is the Naranja Park and the West Lambert Lane Park. Please refer to Exhibit IX-1-A: Trails, Parks & Recreation. Table IX-1-A: Nearby Recreational Facilities Facility Size Type Multi-Use Path along La Cholla N/A Active Trail #33 (a.k.a Poppy Trail) N/A Active Oro Valley Recreation Center 13 acres (not including golf course) Active El Conquistador Country Club Two 18-Hole Championship Golf Courses Active Lambert Lane Park 40 Acres Passive 2. PAD Response A. Recreation Areas i. The Capella PAD includes three dedicated recreation areas, Parcel C (2.1± acres), Parcel F (3.6± acres) and Parcel G (3.8± acres), to provide nearby recreational opportunities for residents and visitors. ii. The recreation areas shall be improved by the developer according to Exhibit I-2-D: Estimated Phasing Plan, as development occurs. iii. The recreation areas shall be credited toward the recreation area acreage and facilities required by Town Code for residential development within the PAD. iv. The recreation areas shall be credited in accordance with PAD and OVZCR standards, toward required Resource Management Area (RMA) Environmentally Sensitive Open Space (ESOS) within the PAD. As identified by the Town’s Environmentally Sensitive Lands provisions, Resource Management Areas are the least sensitive areas of the site. Flexibility, as described below, in the use of Resource Management Area ESOS is provided for in the PAD. As Critical Resource Areas are the most sensitive areas of the site, no additional use or other flexibility is provided for herein. v. Resource Management Area ESOS within the parcels may be used in accordance with OVZCR Section 27.10.F.1; with the addition of restroom structures. When ESOS areas exceed minimum standards, excess ESOS area may be credited toward required ESOS on other PAD Parcels as described in Section I-2-E, Open Space & Recreation Concept. vi. Critical Resource Area ESOS may only be utilized as permitted by OVZCR standards as described in Section I-2-E, Open Space & Recreation Concept. Part IX –Recreation / Trails Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 145 B. Access to Recreation Areas & Trails The Exhibit IX-1-A: Trails, Parks & Recreation shows planned connection points to all adjacent Town trails including the La Cholla multi-use path and Trail #33, The Poppy Trail. The Poppy Trail is located in a wash corridor planned for permanent open space and recreational trail use within Capella. The portions of the Poppy Trail within Capella will be maintained or improved as appropriate, although in areas where the trail doesn’t follow a roadway as a paved surface it is envisioned as a natural “broom trail” in order to minimize wash disturbance. Example photos are provided below. Legal public access will be established via final plats for the Poppy Trail. Continuous pedestrian connectivity will be provided from Lambert Lane north to Naranja Drive. This will be accomplished via a sidewalk along Cross Road, and the Poppy Trail extending north from Cross Road to Naranja Drive. The system of trail alignments and sidewalks within Capella provides good connectivity between all development parcels, the planned recreation areas, and the Town’s trail system beyond Capella. C. Ownership of Recreation Areas & Trails A range of methods will be used to permanently protect and maintain open space in Capella: • Open space including recreation areas and Environmentally Sensitive Open Space (ESOS) within Capella will be largely owned and maintained by a Homeowners’ Association or sub-association. • Some portions of the interconnected open space system may be dedicated to the Town of Oro Valley. These areas may include floodways and certain floodplains and other areas where flood control is a community concern. NARANJA DR. LAMBERT LANESHANNON RD.LA CHOLLA BLVD.TANGERINE RD. LINDA VISTA PARK LA CANADA DR.IRONWOOD TRAIL POPPY TRAILWAS H DEL O R O CANADA1 MILE FROM PROJECT SITE1 MILE FROM PROJECT SITE GLOVER RD. WEST LAMBERT LANE PARK CANADA HILLS D R . EL CONQUISTADOR GOLF & TENNIS Exhibit IX-1-A Trails, Parks & Recreation Q:\110028\A-003 - PAD\01 Planning\04 PAD\PAD Document\Exhibits\EXHIBIT 9-1-A - Existing Rec.dwg Plotted: Sep. 29, 2017Inc. Group The WLB 2000'0' Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003146 LEGEND: Decomposed Granite Trail Natural Trail Paved Trail Paved Multi-use Path Single-track Trail Per Pima Regional Trail System Master Plan Public Recreation Areas Part IX –Recreation / Trails Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 151 (This page intentionally blank) Part XI –Water Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 152 Part X – Schools Part XI –Water Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 153 (This page intentionally blank) Part XI –Water Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 154 1. Existing Conditions Capella is located within the Amphitheater Public School District. Existing schools in the District that may serve Capella include: • Wilson K-8 school is one-half mile to the north of Capella on Glover Road. The school accommodates kindergarten through eighth grades. • Ironwood Ridge High School is located to the west of Capella on Naranja Drive. Other schools in the area that may serve Capella include: • Casas Christian School offers kindergarten through sixth grades, and is located adjacent to Capella. • The Lemon Academy of Excellence offers preschool and K-6 at their Oro Valley location. The school is located 1 ½ miles northeast of Capella on La Canada Drive. • Basis Charter School, which provides kindergarten through high school, is located approximately four miles to the east. • Pusch Ridge Christian Academy, which provides seventh grade through high school, is located approximately 3.5 miles to the southeast. Refer to Exhibit X-1-A: Existing & Proposed Schools. 2. PAD Response A. Indicate number of elementary, junior and senior high school students generated by this PAD amendment. Based on student generation rates provided by the Amphi School District, an analysis of total students generated by Capella at buildout was performed. The analysis assumed a maximum density by including 70 additional dwellings conditionally permitted in two commercial areas if all other residential areas of the PAD develop first. Students Elementary 118 Middle 125 High School 69 B. Indicate remaining capacity within the area schools serving the site. As reported by the Amphi School District in the fall of 2014, the following capacities were available: Capacity Elementary 116 Middle 189 High School 402 C. Provide a letter from the affected school district(s) indicating that a proposed site can accommodate the educational space requirements for the projected number of residents. Part XI –Water Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 155 Amphitheater School District can accommodate the needs of students generated from the Capella community. The property owner has entered into a contract with the District to provide direct donations for every dwelling unit constructed in Capella. Please refer to Exhibit X-2-A: Amphitheater School District Letter. CANADA HILLS D R . LAMBERT LANESHANNON RD.LA CHOLLA BLVD.TANGERINE RD. PEC O S W A Y LA CANADA DR.GLOVER RD. WAS H DEL O R O CANADAIRONWOOD RIDGE HIGH SCHOOL CASAS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL NARANJA DR. IRONWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL WILSON K-8 1 MILE FROM PROJECT SITE 1 MILE FROM PROJECT SITE LEMAN ACADEMY 12 MILE Exhibit X-1-A Existing & Proposed Schools Q:\110028\A-003 - PAD\01 Planning\04 PAD\PAD Document\Exhibits\EXHIBIT 10-1-A - Schools.dwg Plotted: Oct. 02, 2017Inc. Group The WLB 2000'0' Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003156 Part XI –Water Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 157 Exhibit X-2-A: Amphitheater School District Letter Part XI –Water Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 158 Part XI – Water Part XI –Water Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 159 (This page intentionally blank) Part XI –Water Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 160 1. Existing Conditions Capella is within the Oro Valley Water Utility service area. Oro Valley Water Utility has indicated that they will serve this development. A 12” PVC water line exists within the Naranja Drive R.O.W. Contact information: Mark Moore – Oro Valley Water Utility, 11000 N. La Canada Drive, Oro Valley AZ 85737. Tucson Water is the service provider for Ironwood Ridge High School. 2. PAD Response The Oro Valley Water Utility has indicated it has water capacity and will be able to serve the needs of Capella. Any line extensions needed to serve the Capella PAD will be provided by the developer as Capella is built-out. See Exhibit XI-1-A: Water Capacity Letter. Part XI –Water Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 161 Exhibit XI-1-A: Water Capacity Letter Part XI –Water Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 162 Exhibit XI-1-A: Water Capacity Letter (cont’d) TOWN OF ORO VALLEY WATER SERVICE AREA TUCSON WATER OBLIGATED SERVICE AREA METROPOLITAN MAIN WATER SERVICE AREA LAMBERT LN. NARANJA DR.LA CHOLLA BLVD.CASAS CHURCH (NOT A PART)CANADA HILLS DR.TUCSON WATER OBLIGATED SERVICE AREA TOWN OF ORO VALLEY WATER SERVICE AREA TOWN OF ORO VALLEY WATER SERVICE AREA TOWN OF ORO VALLEY WATER SERVICE AREA Exhibit XI-1-B Existing Water Service Areas Q:\110028\A-003 - PAD\01 Planning\04 PAD\PAD Document\Exhibits\EXHIBIT 11-1-B - Existing Water.dwg Plotted: Feb. 05, 2018Inc. Group The WLB 800'0' Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003163 12"12"12"12"12" 12"12"8 "8"8" 12"12"12"8"8"8"8"8"8"8"8"8"8"8" 12"12"8" 8" 8" 8"8"12"12" LAMBERT LN. NARANJA DR.LA CHOLLA BLVD.CANADA HILLS DR.CASAS CHURCH (NOT A PART) K LDR 27.4± Ac. A C-N 8.2± Ac. B C-1 12.2± Ac. D MDR / HDR 14.0± Ac. M LDR 24.0± Ac. E CCE / MDR / HDR 19.0± Ac. H MDR 52.8± Ac. J C-1 18.9± Ac. W W W C Rec. 2.1± Ac.8"W 12" W 8"12" W W TOWN OF ORO VALLEY WATER SERVICE AREA TUCSON WATER OBLIGATED SERVICE AREA METROPOLITAN MAIN WATER SERVICE AREA TUCSON WATER OBLIGATED SERVICE AREA TOWN OF ORO VALLEY WATER SERVICE AREA TOWN OF ORO VALLEY WATER SERVICE AREA TOWN OF ORO VALLEY WATER SERVICE AREA W 12"12"W L CCE / LDR 21.0± Ac. WATER LINE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS DURING LA CHOLLA ROAD WIDENING WATER LINE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS DURING LA CHOLLA ROAD WIDENING12"G Rec. 3.8± Ac. 8"12"8"W F Rec. 3.6± Ac.12"Exhibit XI-2-A Proposed Trunk Infrastructure Plan - Water Q:\110028\A-003 - PAD\01 Planning\04 PAD\PAD Document\Exhibits\EXHIBIT 11-2-A - Proposed Water.dwg Plotted: Feb. 05, 2018Inc. Group The WLB 800'0' Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003164 LEGEND: Proposed Schematic Water System Existing Water Main & Size Existing Water Main to be Abandoned During La Cholla Widening Proposed Connection Point 8" W Part XI –Water Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 165 (This page intentionally blank) Part XII – Wastewater Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 166 Part XII – Wastewater Part XII – Wastewater Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 167 (This page intentionally blank) Part XII – Wastewater Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 168 1. Existing Conditions A trunk sewer line was extended through the approximate center of Capella many years ago in order to provide sewer service to Wilson K-8 School, Ironwood Ridge High School, and Casas Church. That sewer line has capacity to serve Capella. Refer to Exhibit XII-1-A: Sewer Capacity Letter. 2. PAD Response Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department has issued a Type I Sewerage Capacity Investigation letter (see Exhibit XII-1-A: Sewer Capacity Letter), verifying that capacity is available to publically serve the Capella PAD. The project will connect to the public sewer system at several locations along the existing 12” trunk sewer main that runs through the central portions of Capella, as well as to the two 8” mains near the southern edge of the PAD. Part XII – Wastewater Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 169 Exhibit XII-1-A: Sewer Capacity Letter LAMBERT LN.LA CHOLLA BLVD.CASAS CHURCH (NOT A PART)8"12"8"12"8"8" 8" 8"8"8"8"8"8" 8"8"8" 8" 8" 8" 8" 8"8"8"8"8"8"8"NARANJA DR.8"10" 10" 8"8"8"8"8"8"12"12"8"8"8"8"12"12"12"8" ESTATES AT CAPELLA (NOT A PART) 8 "CANADA HILLS DR.IRONWOOD RIDGE HIGH SCHOOL CROSS RD.Exhibit XII-1-B Existing Sewer Infrastructure Q:\110028\A-003 - PAD\01 Planning\04 PAD\PAD Document\Exhibits\EXHIBIT 12-1-B - Existing Sewer.dwg Plotted: Feb. 05, 2018Inc. Group The WLB 800'0' Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003170 LEGEND: PUBLIC SEWER MAIN LAMBERT LN.LA CHOLLA BLVD.NARANJA DR.CANADA HILLS DR.8" 8" 8"8"8"8"8"8" 8"8"8" 8" 8" 8" 8" 8"8"8"8"8"8"8"8"10" 10" 8"8"8"8"8"8"12"12"8"8"8"8"12"12"12"8" 8 " CC C C C C 8"12"12"8"8" C F Rec. 3.6± Ac. K LDR 27.4± Ac. A C-N 8.2± Ac. B C-1 12.2± Ac. C Rec. 2.1± Ac. D MDR / HDR 14.0± Ac. M LDR 24.0± Ac. E CCE / MDR / HDR 19.0± Ac. L CCE / LDR 21.0± Ac. H MDR 52.8± Ac.G Rec. 3.8± Ac. J C-1 18.9± Ac.8"8"8"8"8"8"8"8"8"8"12"8"8"8"12"8"8"CASAS CHURCH (NOT A PART) ESTATES AT CAPELLA (NOT A PART) IRONWOOD RIDGE HIGH SCHOOL Exhibit XII-2-A Proposed Trunk Infrastructure Plan - Sewer Q:\110028\A-003 - PAD\01 Planning\04 PAD\PAD Document\Exhibits\EXHIBIT 12-2-A - Proposed Sewer.dwg Plotted: Feb. 05, 2018Inc. Group The WLB 800'0' Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003171 LEGEND: Proposed Schematic Public Sewer System Existing Public Sewer Main Existing Sewer Main to be Abandoned Proposed Connection PointC Part XIII – McHarg Composite Map Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 172 Part XIII – McHarg Composite Map Part XIII – McHarg Composite Map Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 173 (This page intentionally blank) Part XIII – McHarg Composite Map Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 175 (This page intentionally blank) Part XIV – PAD Administration Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 176 Part XIV – PAD Administration Part XIV – PAD Administration Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 177 (This page intentionally blank) Part XIV – PAD Administration Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 178 1. Interpretation When the provisions of this Planned Area Development (PAD) are interpreted or applied, they shall be held to be the minimum requirements for the promotion of the public safety, health, comfort, convenience, and general welfare. Whenever there is any question regarding the interpretation of the provisions of this PAD or the application of those provisions to any individual case or situation, the Planning and Zoning Administrator shall be responsible for the interpretation of the PAD when there is a question of clarity of any provision, standard, or permitted use within the PAD. Interpretations may be appealed to the Board of Adjustment in accordance with the procedures of the Oro Valley Zoning Code. 2. Conflict The provisions of this PAD are not intended to interfere with or abrogate or annul any ordinance, rule, regulation or permit previously adopted or issued, and not in conflict with any provision of this PAD, or which shall be adopted or issued pursuant to law relating to the use of building or ordinance not in conflict with this PAD; nor it is intended by this PAD to interfere with or abrogate or annul any easement, covenant or other agreement between parties. 3. Land Uses Not Listed All uses not specifically listed in this PAD are prohibited. However, the Planning and Zoning Administrator may determine that a use not listed is comparable, substantially similar in of terms neighborhood impact, or analogous to a listed use and, once so determined, it shall be treated in the same manner as the listed use. Such determination may be appealed to the Board of Adjustment in accordance with the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised. 4. Development Regulations and Standards Not Listed Any development regulation or standard not specifically covered in this PAD shall be subject to the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised (OVZCR). In cases where development regulations and standards set forth in this PAD are inconsistent with OVZCR, the PAD shall prevail. The provisions of this PAD shall also prevail where there is an inconsistency between this PAD and other City ordinances, rules and regulations. Any development regulation and standard not addressed in this PAD shall be subject to the Town’s adopted regulations in place at the time of the individual application. Part XIV – PAD Administration Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 179 5. Amendments Amendments to the PAD will fall into one of the following three categories, and shall follow the procedures described below. Regardless of which procedure a development proposal must follow, the Planning & Zoning Administrator shall have the ability to review and administratively approve alternative parking calculations. A. Substantial Conformance If a development proposal substantially conforms to the Tentative Development Plan concepts in the PAD, the proposal may proceed directly to Final Site Plan for administrative approval because it will have an equivalent or lesser impact on surrounding residents than those depicted on the Tentative Development Plan concepts. Substantial conformance means that a development proposal does not vary material terms or conditions of the PAD rezoning, including material changes to the permitted uses, or development standards or zoning conditions relating to building heights, perimeter setbacks, open space requirements, floor area ratios, or densities depicted on the Tentative Development Plan concepts. B. General Conformance If a development proposal generally conforms to the Tentative Development Plan concepts in the PAD, however, it includes a 25% or greater increase to any of the requirements listed below, the proposal shall follow the Town’s standard site plan review process, requiring Planning and Zoning Commission and Town Council consideration. i. Increase in building gross floor area by more than 25%. ii. Major alterations to circulation patterns as determined by the Town Engineer and Planning and Zoning Administrator. iii. Modification of 25% or more of parking spaces or parking lot area. C. Non-Conformance If a development proposal substantially deviates from the Tentative Development Plan concepts in the PAD, the proposal shall require an amendment to the PAD. Significant deviation shall mean that proposed land uses, access points, circulation patterns, or general development intensity significantly deviate from the Tentative Development Plan concepts in the PAD. Part XV – GP Policy Compliance Analysis Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 180 Part XV – General Plan Policy Compliance Analysis Part XV – GP Policy Compliance Analysis Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 181 (This page intentionally blank) Part XV – GP Policy Compliance Analysis Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 182 1. General Plan Policy Compliance Analysis This PAD meets the Special Area Policies listed in Exhibit 1-2-B. The following analysis is provided as required to show substantial conformance to many of the General Plan’s regular policies. Criteria Comments Met? 1. Land Use Element a. Varied types and intensities of development have been incorporated. The PAD includes a variety of land use types and intensities, both residential and non- residential. Y b. Site analysis information completely supports the land use proposals contained in the PAD. The development opportunities and constraints of the property have been thoroughly detailed in the Site Analysis. Y c. A mix of housing types, such as single-family attached and detached, single-family cluster homes, patio homes, townhouses and apartments, is incorporated in the PAD. The PAD proposes low, medium, and high density housing. Y d. The PAD promotes clustered (average density) developments to protect environmentally sensitive areas. Onsite ESL CRA’s have been preserved except for necessary roadway and utility crossings. This has been accomplished by clustering development away from those sensitive areas. Y e. Higher density or intensity developments abutting lower density or intensity areas include buffering and shall substantially mitigate any negative impacts. The PAD proposes a gradual transition from high to medium to low intensity land uses, with the higher intensities located adjacent to La Cholla Blvd., and the less intense land uses located near the PAD’s western boundary. Y f. Residential neighborhoods are afforded multi- modal access to, and are in close proximity to, activity centers to minimize travel times. Each parcel in the PAD has multi-modal connections to the proposed commercial areas as well as to the regional roadway and trail systems beyond the PAD’s boundary. Y g. Activity centers provide a wide range of appropriate services. The PAD proposes three commercial centers, each of which has design guidelines and use restrictions that were borne out of the General Plan amendment process, and which provide appropriate development intensities and services for each parcel’s specific location. Y h. The PAD protects natural features through transfer of development densities and similar strategies. The PAD provides the ESLO-required percentages of ESOS, while allowing the flexibility to designate more or less ESOS on any given parcel. This has the effect of transferring developable area from parcel to parcel depending on the specific environmental constraints found. Y i. Office, technical and corporate employment facilities are scaled to the surrounding area. The three commercial parcels allow office and employment uses. Research & development and business incubators are specifically encouraged on Parcel B, but have development guidelines established to ensure any such development is appropriately scaled. Y j. Campus-type employment is incorporated. Parcel B allows R&D, business incubators, and other campus-type employment uses. Y Part XV – GP Policy Compliance Analysis Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 183 Criteria Comments Met? k. Multi-family residential development, at moderate to higher unit densities, has access to arterial or collector roadways. The PAD’s two higher density residential parcels are located along La Cholla Blvd. Y l. Multi-family (apartment or condominium) developments have planned-in recreational facilities and other amenities. Apartments are specifically prohibited within Capella due to a General Plan Special Area Policy. However, the two parcels within the PAD that could potentially feature condominium development are intentionally located next to the PAD’s three community recreation areas. Y m. Recreational facilities and appropriate links to open space amenities are provided. All three of the PAD’s community recreation areas are located along wash corridors and collector roadways, and thus have excellent access both to the trail system and the system of streetside multi-use paths and sidewalks. Y 2. Transportation Element a. The Oracle Road Corridor is de-emphasized for high intensity development. Not applicable. N/A b. Bike lanes are included in all planned arterial improvements and on collectors deemed appropriate in the development review process. Final design of pedestrian facilities along collector roads within the PAD may include multi-use paths, but not on-street bicycle lanes. N c. Homeowners associations are required to maintain pedestrian-bicycle paths, within approved master-planned communities. The HOA(s) within Capella will be responsible for maintenance of all trails that are within common areas or along private streets. Y d. Bicycle parking facilities are provided. Bicycle parking facilities will be provided within nonresidential developments. Y e. Safe pedestrian/bicycle access to schools and parks is provided within the boundaries of the PAD. Schematic sidewalk, multi-use path, and natural hiking trails have been delineated and described in Part IX – Recreation / Trails. Y f. Curvilinear residential streets patterns are incorporated. Schematic sidewalk, multi-use path, and natural hiking trails have been delineated and described in Part IX – Recreation / Trails. Y g. Sidewalks or related pedestrian facilities are incorporated within neighborhoods. Neighborhood streets will meet the OV Subdivision Street Standards, which include pedestrian facilities. Y h. All new roadway and future pedestrian-bicycle improvements meet public design standards. Y i. Park-and-ride lots are incorporated with planned facilities. Park-and-Ride lots may be developed within Capella, but none are specifically planned at this time. N j. Projects larger than 100 acres in size provide direct access to an arterial. Capella gains access directly from three arterial roads. Y 3. Economic Development Element a. A favorable fiscal impact analysis. A fiscal impact analysis has not been prepared, although such an analysis would surely confirm the economic benefits of this proposed PAD. N Part XV – GP Policy Compliance Analysis Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 184 Criteria Comments Met? 4. Public Services and Facilities Element a. School site planning has been addressed in large- scale planned communities. Amphi School District has confirmed that no school sites are needed within Capella. Y b. One elementary school site of at least ten (10) acres has been reserved within developments for every 500 elementary school level students forecasted to live within the development. Amphi School District estimates that this PAD will generate approximately 118 elementary school level students. N/A c. Park/school combination site dedications are incorporated. Not applicable. N/A 5. Community Design Element a. Building height and bulk are moderate to low intensity, in harmony with individual site attributes. During the General Plan amendment process a number of building height restrictions were placed on the property, ensuring compatibility with surrounding residential areas. Y b. Parking lots with greater than 20 car capacity are screened from adjacent uses and public thoroughfares. Meeting this criteria would compromise the viability of retail uses to be developed within the PAD. This criteria should be removed from the list because it is bad for Oro Valley’s struggling retail market. N 6. Open Space / Recreation Element a. Pedestrian, equestrian and bicycle trails are designated including picnic/rest areas. Schematic sidewalk, multi-use path, and natural hiking trails have been delineated and described in Part IX – Recreation / Trails. Y b. Handicapped accessible facilities are provided to users. Handicapped accessible facilities will be provided in accordance with government regulations. Y c. Recreation and open space facilities are linked to the community open space network where appropriate. The community recreation areas within the PAD are all adjacent to the wash / trail network. Y d. Gateway treatments are incorporated at appropriate locations along the open space network. To be determined during the design phase. Y e. Neighborhood scale recreation (at a suggested standard of three (3) acres per 1000 population) and appropriate linkages to existing and planned trail systems are provided. The PAD far exceeds this ratio. Y 7. Natural Resources Conservation Element a. The floodplains of washes with a discharge greater than 1000 cubic feet per second (cfs) during the 100 year flood event and associated riparian habitats are preserved as natural open space except as stipulated in number 7.b. Critical Resource Areas designated by the ESLO are preserved except for necessary roadway and utility crossings. However, the 100-year floodplain exceeds the CRA boundary in some places, and may be encroached upon. N b. Washes with a discharge greater than 100 cfs during the 100 year flood event and associated riparian habitats are preserved if vegetation and habitat quality are found to be unique by the Planning and Zoning Commission and Town Council. Critical Resource Areas designated by the ESLO are preserved except for necessary roadway and utility crossings. However, the 100-year floodplain exceeds the CRA boundary in some places, and may be encroached upon. N Part XV – GP Policy Compliance Analysis Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 185 Criteria Comments Met? c. Hydrologic studies of washes greater than 100 cfs discharge during the 100 year flood event are provided which include effects on riparian habitats. The PAD will meet the requirements of the OV Drainage Criteria Manual and Floodplain Ordinance, but no additional studies are proposed. N d. Only native plant materials and approved Southern Arizona Water Resources Association plants are utilized. Y e. Only floodplain compatible uses are proposed in flood prone areas. Y f. When erosion protection is required, environmentally sensitive alternatives including geotextiles or gunite containing integral desert colors are utilized as opposed to concrete lining of water courses. Erosion protection within the PAD will feature integral desert colors. Y g. Indigenous (native desert) vegetation and riparian habitats are maintained and enhanced where possible. CRA’s will be preserved in their entirety except for necessary roadway and utility crossings. Y h. Select native plant material, which is to be transplanted within the development or to approved sites outside the project limits. Developments within the PAD will follow the OV Native Plant Preservation requirements. Y i. Mass grading techniques are minimized for project development. Mass grading reduces urban sprawl, and also allows homebuilders to provide a higher level of amenities rather than spending money on less efficient grading techniques. N 8. Safety Element a. Bike paths are constructed, where feasible and appropriate, to separate pedestrian and bike traffic from motorized vehicles in order to provide safe access to schools and parks. Off-street paths and trails are proposed throughout the PAD. Y b. The PAD adheres to the “Suggested Policies for Fire Management in the Wildland Urban Interface,” published by the National Forest Service, May 1990. We were unable to locate a copy of the document. ? 9. Cultural / Historic Element a. A cultural resource survey has been performed where cultural/archaeological resources are determined likely to occur according to the Arizona State Museum. A survey has been prepared by a licensed archaeologist, and the survey’s recommendations will be followed. Y b. The PAD provides for protection of cultural resources discovered during construction. Yes, per State law. Y c. Cultural resources sites are left generally undisturbed and not identified to the public. No significant cultural resources were identified, and archaeological survey was not distributed to the public. Y Part XVI – Zoning Standard Modifications Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 186 Part XVI – Summary Table of Zoning Standard Modifications Part XVI – Zoning Standard Modifications Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 187 (This page intentionally blank) Part XVI – Zoning Standard Modifications Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 188 1. Summary Table of Zoning Standard Modifications The following table summarizes the standards and provisions of the Oro Valley Zoning Code that the Capella Planned Area Development (PAD) modifies in their application to the Capella community. OVZCR Section Subject OVZCR Standard PAD Modification Rationale 1. 23.4 Table 23-2A C-N Building Height Parcel A Maximum Building Height 25’ or 2 stories. Maximum Building Height 24’, 2 stories. Lower height in accordance with GP Amendment and policy. 2. 23.8.B.2.a C-N Building Height Parcel A Buildings limited to 18’ within 85’ of residential district. Adjacent Common Areas can count toward that 85’. Allows more efficient use of site’s natural features as setback areas. 3. 23.8.B.1.d C-N Residential Use Parcel A Maximum 50% of site can be used for residential. All of site can be used for residential, subject to GP Policy. Residential only permitted as back up land use. Consistency with GP policy which supports 100% residential if the remainder of the PAD builds out residential. 4. 23.8.B.1.a C-N Commercial Floor Area Parcel A Floor area limits of 5,000 sq. ft. for each business with an increase to 9,000 square feet for the specific uses listed in 23.8.1.B.1.a; CUP required for anything larger. Floor area limited to 20,000 per business; CUP required for anything larger. Increases ability to attract businesses to Oro Valley by providing increased flexibility for commercial property users, broadens the range of potential commercial or service users. 5. 23.3 Table 23-1 C-1 Single- Family Use Parcel B Single family residential not permitted Single family permitted in accordance with GP policy as back up use Consistency of the PAD with GP policy allowing residential at project build out. 6. 23.4 Table 23-2A C-1 Building Height Parcel B Maximum building height is 25’ and 2 stories. Max Ht Anchors- 30’ Max Ht all others- 25’ Provide flexibility; encourage/reduce barriers for employment and retail uses; GP amendment requires enhanced buffering be provided along Naranja. 7. 23.7.E.2.a R-6 Open Space Parcels D & E 250 sq. ft. of outdoor living space required for each dwelling. Allows RMA ESOS credit for outdoor living space in HDR areas if adjacent to other qualifying ESOS. These areas can count toward RMA ESOS which is the least sensitive. Part XVI – Zoning Standard Modifications Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 189 8. 23.7.E.2.c R-6 Private Open Space Parcels D & E Provide private outdoor living area equal to 20% of dwelling unit floor area. Standard does not apply; 250 square feet of useable outdoor open space is already required for each dwelling. This standard is designed to ensure private outdoor space for apartment type dwellings. No apartments are permitted in Capella. Amounts of open space in Capella will generally exceed Town minimum standards. 9. 23.7.E.6.a R-6 Recreational Facilities Requires indoor recreation facility. No indoor recreation facility required as apartments are not permitted. Rec facilities provided in accordance w Town standards for single family homes. This standard is designed to ensure varied recreation facilities for apartment type dwellings. No apartments are permitted in Capella. The community will have a wide range of recreational facilities as specified in the PAD and the OVZCR. 10. 23.7.E.3.a R-6 Setbacks Parcels D & E Limits R-6 buildings to 18’ height within 100’ of R-1 Districts. Limits buildings to 18’ within 50’ of R-1 Districts. No apartment buildings are permitted which is the target of the 100’ required by code. Only single family detached and attached homes. 11. 23.7.E.2 R-6 Open Space Parcels D & E 35% of net lot (R-6 site) area required as open space. Open space will be provided in accordance with the ESOS Plan in the PAD for Parcels D and E and the adjoining areas. Further, open space for each Parcel is summarized in the PAD. The ESOS Plan, nearby recreation areas and open space on Parcels D and E will provide adequate open space in these somewhat denser areas of the PAD. No apartment development is permitted in the PAD. 12. 23.4 Table 23-2A R1-7 Minimum Lot Size Parcel H Minimum lot size is 7,000 sq. ft. Minimum lot size is 6,600 sq. ft.; lots adjacent to Lambert Lane must be 10,000 sq. ft. Provides flexibility in product builders can offer, improves affordability. Consistent with GPA Conditions of Approval. 13. 23.4 Table 23-2A R1-7 Minimum Lot Width Parcels A, B, D, E, H, K, L & M Minimum lot width is 70’. Minimum lot width is 55’. Provides lot design flexibility for deeper lots, larger yards; promotes efficient use of infrastructure-less roadway, water & sewer lines, fewer miles travelled. Consistent with town-adopted cluster development principles. Part XVI – Zoning Standard Modifications Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 190 14. 23.4 Table 23-2A R1-7 Setbacks Parcels A, B, D, E, H, K , L & M Minimum front setback is 20’. Minimum side setback is 7.5. Minimum front setback is 15’; minimum 20’ driveway required Minimum side setback is 5’ unless adjacent to Lambert Lane where 15’ between homes is required. Increase residential design flexibility and improves opportunities for articulation in structure. Also provides larger lots and setbacks in perimeter area along Lambert Lane. 15. 23.8.C.1 C-1 Site Design Parcel J Single user limited to 60,000 square feet, larger users allowed with CUP. Single user limited to 125,000 square feet as shown on the TDPs. Remove barrier to anchor users; located on regional transportation corridor. 16. 23.4 Table 23-2A C-1 Building Height Parcel J Maximum building height is 25’ and 2 stories. Max. building height for Anchors = 30’. Max. building height for all others = 25’. Provide flexibility; encourage/reduce barriers for employment use; enhanced buffering required along Naranja. 17. 27.10.D.3.f. 3.b ESOS Standards Setback is 15’; 20’ for wall, retaining walls, structures from ESOS areas. Setback is 5’ but with boulders or other protective barrier as approved by the Planning & Zoning Administrator to protect ESOS during construction. Provides flexibility and efficiency of land use for areas adjacent to ESOS areas. 18. 27.10 ESOS Standards Minimum ESOS requirements applied to each conceptual site plan for each development Parcel. Allow transfer of ESOS between development Parcels; maintains project wide required ESOS with tabulations. Provides for greater consolidation of open space as encouraged by ESL standards and the adopted General Plan. Allows for improved utilization of commercial parcels. LOCATION MAP CAPELLA REZONING (OV1601793) Attachment 3 LONG RANGE CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN CAPELLA REZONING (OV1601793) Attachment 3 Attachment 5 Capella PAD rezoning Special Area Policies Planning and Zoning Commission March 6, 2018 1. Planning unit boundaries are shown graphically. The actual boundaries extend to the centerline of adjacent rights-of-way or property boundaries as depicted on the Long Range Conceptual Master Plan dated April 22, 2015 and approved during the General Plan Amendment process. 2. Lands outside the Critical Resource Areas shall be considered Resource Management Area Tier 2. 3. At the time of rezoning, a master plan shall be prepared through the use of a Planned Area Development (PAD) zoning for the entire site, including: a. A Master Land Use Plan, which will formalize the Long Range Conceptual Master Plan dated April 22, 2015 and approved during the General Plan amendment process, and which will correspond to descriptions of the various land use categories proposed in the PAD. b. A Master Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA), which will outline roadway improvements that are anticipated to be necessary as the PAD develops. The Master TIA shall be updated with each individual Conceptual Site Plan proposed within the PAD, determining which, if any, roadway improvements are necessary to mitigate each development’s impacts. The TIA shall identify and substantiate traffic control methods to minimize or mitigate potential traffic impacts to Canada Hills Drive, which is a private roadway. The ultimate alignment of subdivision access roads and use of proposed traffic control methods are entirely subject to Town Engineer review and approval. c. A Master Recreation & Trails Plan, which will schematically show bicycle and pedestrian circulation within the PAD. The Plan will also include schematic programming for the different recreational area nodes shown on the Long Range Conceptual Master Plan dated April 22, 2015 and approved during the General Plan Amendment process. d. A Master Environmentally Sensitive Open Space (ESOS) plan showing the placement of required open space within the entire future Planned Area Development area. ESOS within Resource Management Areas shall be located along adjacent Critical Resource Areas to the greatest extent practical, outside of Neighborhood Commercial – Office parcels. e. A Master Utilities Plan, which will show anticipated trunk utility extensions needed throughout the PAD. 4. The total maximum of permitted units is 500 for all areas designated as residential (including townhomes). The Neighborhood Commercial - Office properties at La Cholla and Naranja shall have a back-up designation of Medium Density Residential (MDR) (2.1 – 5.0 homes per acre), allowing an additional 70 units. The back -up designation of MDR may only be utilized once the remainder of the Master Planned Community residential parcels have been developed. 5. No apartments shall be permitted. 6. No Senior Care facilities shall be permitted, unless operated in conjunction with the expansion of the Casas Church. 7. No crematoriums shall be permitted. 8. Gun and ammunition sales shall not constitute the primary use within a business within the development. 9. For the northwest corner of La Cholla and Naranja Drives designated as Neighborhood Commercial - Office, all C-N uses enabled in Town zoning are permitted, except as provided below: a. Supermarkets, car washes, gas stations, auto service centers and convenience stores such as Circle K, 7-11 or similar are prohibited. b. Drive thru uses and other convenience uses subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. c. Back-up designation of Medium Density Residential (2.1 – 5.0 homes per acre) is permitted, with a cap of 30 units. d. Maximum building height shall be limited to 24 feet. e. Packaged alcohol sales shall not constitute the primary use within a business. 10. For the southwest corner of La Cholla and Naranja Drives designated as Neighborhood Commercial - Office, all C-1 uses enabled in Town zoning are permitted, except as provided below: a. Broadcasting station, fabric store, medical marijuana dispensary, video store, appliance repair, laundromat, car washes, auto service centers, convenience stores such as Circle K, 7-11 or similar, theater, or a major communications facility are prohibited. b. Drive thru uses and other convenience uses are subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. c. Back-up designation of Medium Density Residential (2.1 – 5.0 homes per acre) is permitted, with a cap of 40 units. d. Packaged alcohol sales shall not constitute the primary use within a business. e. Dry cleaners limited to drop off / pick up only, are permitted. 11. A 200 foot natural open space buffer shall be provided on the west boundary adjacent to existing residential areas as shown on the Long Range Conceptual Master Plan dated April 22, 2015 and approved during the General Plan amendment process. No trails shall be provided within this buffer area. 12. Homes shall be restricted to single story, not to exceed 20 feet in height along the west and south as denoted on the Long Range Conceptual Master Plan dated April 22, 2015 and approved during the General Plan amendment process. Expansions of the Casas Church campus in these areas shall be restricted to 25 feet in height. 13. Areas designated Medium Density Residential shall include perimeter buffer yards with enhanced vegetation (density and size) to screen lots along arterial roadways. Sizable native vegetation that is required to be transplanted, as specified in the zoning code, shall be placed in buffer yards. 14. The Park areas within the Master Plan shall count toward the recreation area acreage required by Town Code for residential development within the Master Plan. The Park areas shall be improved by the developer with a commensurate level of amenities as required by the Zoning Code. 15. The development shall substantially conform to the Long Range Conceptual Master Plan dated April 22, 2015 and approved during the General Plan Amendment process. 16. These Special Area Policies represent agreed upon elements as part of the general plan amendment to be reflected in the required Planned Area Development zoning. These Special Area Policies should not be construed as the complete list of standards and requirements applicable to the Planned Area Development. Additional development standards and requirements will be comprehensively addressed during the subsequent rezoning process. 17. Areas designated Low Density Residential shall include a perimeter buffer yard with enhanced vegetation (density and size) along the entire eastern edge of the 200 foot natural open space area adjacent to existing residences. Sizable native vegetation that is required to be transplanted as specified in the Zoning Code shall be placed in that eastern edge buffer yard. The intent of this enhanced buffer yard is to fill in any significant gaps in the native tree canopy within the 200 foot natural open space area, as viewed from the existing residences to the west. The enhanced buffer yard shall meet the Town’s 10 foot Bufferyard ‘A’ requirements. 18. Grading permits for the development shall not be issued until the contract for the Regional Transportation Authority’s widening of La Cholla Boulevard has been awarded to a contractor. 19. Traffic shall not be allowed to cross La Cholla Boulevard directly from the development to Cañada Hills Drive. 20. The 53 acre Medium Density Residential parcel on the north side of Lambert Lane shall be restricted to a maximum density of 3 homes per acre, requires a minimum lot size of 6,600 square feet and requires a minimum of 10,000 square foot longs along the north side of Lambert Lane with a minimum of 15 feet between homes. GENERAL PLAN MAP CAPELLA REZONING (OV1601793) Attachment 7 ZONING MAP CAPELLA REZONING (OV1601793) Attachment 7 Attachment 8 Capella PAD rezoning General Plan Conformance Analysis Planning and Zoning Commission March 6, 2018 General Plan Land Use designation The subject property has a Land Use designation of Master Planned Community "Areas where large developments with a mix of uses is planned and developed in a comprehensive manner with a unified design theme. Developments in this land use designation generally provide a range of uses including a variety of housing options, shopping and employment opportunities and recreational amenities with a safe and efficient network for automobiles, bicycles and pedestrians." The rezoning request is consistent with the Master Planned Community land use designation as it incorporates a comprehensively planned design for the entire 207-acres including cohesive parcel layouts, recreation areas, open space and safe, convenient connectivity for both motorized and non- motorized travel. Special Area Policies The Special Area Policies approved as part of the prior Major General Plan Amendment are listed below, followed by staff response in italics: 1. Planning unit boundaries are shown graphically. The actual boundaries extend to the centerline of adjacent rights-of-way or property boundaries as depicted on the Long Range Conceptual Master Plan dated April 22, 2015 and approved during the General Plan Amendment process. Staff response: No comment. 2. Lands outside the Critical Resource Areas shall be considered Resource Management Area Tier 2. Staff response: All lands outside the Critical Resource Areas have been labeled as Resource Management Area Tier 2. A plan for the entire Capella Planned Area Development (PAD) has been included in Table II-2-B-1: ESOS Calculations. The table includes minimum percentages for all Critical Resource Areas (CRA’s) and Resource Management Area’s (RMA’s). The PAD permits transfers of RMA Environmentally Sensitive Open Space upon approval by the Planning and Zoning Administrator upon demonstration by the applicant how the rebalance will be achieved. 3. At the time of rezoning, a master plan shall be prepared through the use of a Planned Area Development (PAD) zoning for the entire site, including: a. A Master Land Use Plan, which will formalize the Long Range Conceptual Master Plan dated April 22, 2015 and approved during the General Plan amendment process, and which will correspond to descriptions of the various land use categories proposed in the PAD. Staff response: This Capella PAD document serves as the required Master Land Use Plan b. A Master Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA), which will outline roadway improvements that are anticipated to be necessary as the PAD develops. The Master TIA shall be updated with each individual Conceptual Site Plan proposed within the PAD, determining which, if any, roadway improvements are necessary to mitigate each development’s impacts. The TIA shall identify and substantiate traffic control methods to minimize or mitigate potential traffic impacts to Canada Hills Drive, which is a private roadway. The ultimate ali gnment of subdivision access roads and use of proposed traffic control methods are entirely subject to Town Engineer review and approval. Staff response: The applicant has provided a preliminary Traffic Impact Analysis with this request. The applicant is currently finalizing and update to this document which will be completed in advance of the second required public hearing. c. A Master Recreation & Trails Plan, which will schematically show bicycle and pedestrian circulation within the PAD. The Plan will also include schematic programming for the different recreational area nodes shown on the Long Range Conceptual Master Plan dated April 22, 2015 and approved during the General Plan Amendment process. Staff response: The Capella PAD document includes a Mas ter Recreation Area & Trails Plan which includes details for those amenities throughout the PAD. d. A Master Environmentally Sensitive Open Space (ESOS) plan showing the placement of required open space within the entire future Planned Area Development area. ESOS within Resource Management Areas shall be located along adjacent Critical Resource Areas to the greatest extent practical, outside of Neighborhood Commercial – Office parcels. Staff response: The applicant’s proposal includes an ESOS plan for the entirety of the Capella PAD which specifies minimum acreages for Critical Resource Area preservation and the ability to transfer Resource Management Area ESOS when approved by the Planning and Zoning Administrator. e. A Master Utilities Plan, which will show anticipated trunk utility extensions needed throughout the PAD. Staff response: The applicant’s proposal includes a Master Utilities Plan. 4. The total maximum of permitted units is 500 for all areas designated as residential (including townhomes). The Neighborhood Commercial - Office properties at La Cholla and Naranja shall have a back-up designation of Medium Density Residential (MDR) (2.1 – 5.0 homes per acre), allowing an additional 70 units. The back-up designation of MDR may only be utilized once the remainder of the Master Planned Community residential parcels have been developed. Staff response: The highest number of units shown on the individual Tentative Development Plan Concepts for each parcel is 552 units. This number includes the potential 70 “back-up” lots on Parcels A & B. 5. No apartments shall be permitted. Staff response: No apartments have been proposed in the applicant’s request 6. No Senior Care facilities shall be permitted, unless operated in conjunction with the expansion of the Casas Church. Staff response: The only Senior Care Facilities proposed are those that are a component of a future Casas Adobes Baptist Church expansion. 7. No crematoriums shall be permitted. Staff response: No crematoriums have been proposed in the applicant’s req uest 8. Gun and ammunition sales shall not constitute the primary use within a business within the development. Staff response: This note has been included in those areas where gun and ammunition sales are permitted. 9. For the northwest corner of La Cholla and Naranja Drives designated as Neighborhood Commercial - Office, all C-N uses enabled in Town zoning are permitted, except as provided below: a. Supermarkets, car washes, gas stations, auto service centers and convenience stores such as Circle K, 7-11 or similar are prohibited. b. Drive thru uses and other convenience uses subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. c. Back-up designation of Medium Density Residential (2.1 – 5.0 homes per acre) is permitted, with a cap of 30 units. d. Maximum building height shall be limited to 24 feet. e. Packaged alcohol sales shall not constitute the primary use within a business. Staff response: All of the above restrictions have been included for Parcel A. 10. For the southwest corner of La Cholla and Naranja Drives designated as Neighborhood Commercial - Office, all C-1 uses enabled in Town zoning are permitted, except as provided below: a. Broadcasting station, fabric store, medical marijuana dispensary, video store, appliance repair, laundromat, car washes, auto service centers, convenience stores such as Circle K, 7-11 or similar, theater, or a major communications facility are prohibited. b. Drive thru uses and other convenience uses are subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. c. Back-up designation of Medium Density Residential (2.1 – 5.0 homes per acre) is permitted, with a cap of 40 units. d. Packaged alcohol sales shall not constitute the primary use within a business. e. Dry cleaners limited to drop off / pick up only, are permitted. Staff response: All of the above restrictions have been included for Parcel B. 11. A 200 foot natural open space buffer shall be provided on the west boundary adjacent to existing residential areas as shown on the Long Range Conceptual Master Plan dated April 22, 2015 and approved during the General Plan amendment process. No trails shall be provided within this buffer area. Staff response: The 200-foot natural area buffer has been included along the west side of the property in Parcels K, L & M to provide additional buffer to existing large-lot residents to the west. 12. Homes shall be restricted to single story, not to exceed 20 feet in height along the west and south as denoted on the Long Range Conceptual Master Plan dated April 22, 2015 and approved during the General Plan amendment process. Expansions of the Casas Church campus in these areas shall be restricted to 25 feet in height. Staff response: The single-story restriction has been incorporated into the TDP’s for Parcels K, L & M along the western border of the PAD. 13. Areas designated Medium Density Residential shall include perimeter buffer yards with enhanced vegetation (density and size) to screen lots along arterial roadways. Sizable native vegetation that is required to be transplanted, as specified in the zoning code, shall be placed in buffer yards. Staff response: The development standards for those Parcels along arterial roadways includes additional language requiring enhanced vegetation and screening to minimize visual impacts. 14. The Park areas within the Master Plan shall count toward the recreation area acreage required by Town Code for residential development within the Master Plan. The Park areas shall be improved by the developer with a commensurate level of amenities as required by the Zoning Code. Staff response: The Capella PAD includes three recreation areas, each of which include play structures and turf areas. Furthermore, basketball courts and dog parks are also included. Lastly, a comprehensive trail system and multi-use path network have also been included to provide additional pedestrian connectivity. 15. The development shall substantially conform to the Long Range Conceptual Master Plan dated April 22, 2015 and approved during the General Plan Amendment process. Staff response: The applicant’s proposal is in substantial conformance with the approved Long Range Conceptual Master Plan and Special Area Policies developed as part of the General Plan Amendment process. 16. These Special Area Policies represent agreed upon elements as part of the general plan amendment to be reflected in the required Planned Area Development zoning. These Special Area Policies should not be construed as the complete list of standards and requirements applicable to the Planned Area Development. Additional development standards and requirements will be comprehensively addressed during the subsequent rezoning process. Staff response: These Special Area Policies served as the foundation for the applicant’s proposed rezoning. Additional development standards were included to further refine the Capella PAD and ensure the property was comprehensively designed and accounted for potential impacts to existing development in the area. 17. Areas designated Low Density Residential shall include a perimeter buffer yard with enhanced vegetation (density and size) along the entire eastern edge of the 200 foot natural open space area adjacent to existing residences. Sizable native vegetation that is required to be transplanted as specified in the Zoning Code shall be placed in that eastern edge buffer yard. The intent of this enhanced buffer yard is to fill in any significant gaps in the native tree canopy within the 200 foot natural open space area, as viewed from the existing residences to the west. The enhanced buffer yard shall meet the Town’s 10 foot Bufferyard ‘A’ requirements. Staff response: Parcels K, L & M (those shown as Low Density Residential) have incorporated a 200-foot natural bufferyard area to help minimize impacts to the existing large-lot residential west of the property. 18. Grading permits for the development shall not be issued until the contract for the Regional Transportation Authority’s widening of La Cholla Boulevard has been awarded to a contractor. Staff response: No grading permits have been issued for any property within the Capella PAD. Individual parcels will need to have Final Site Plan, Improvement Plan and Final Plat (if necessary) approval prior to grading permits being issued. Further, it is anticipated a contract will be awarded in early to mid-2018, well before any grading permits will be issued. 19. Traffic shall not be allowed to cross La Cholla Boulevard directly from the development to Cañada Hills Drive. Staff response: As stated in the Planning and Zoning Commission report, this Special Area Policy is still be evaluated as it may present a traffic concern for both the Town Engineer and Police Chief. Following the final Traffic Impact Analysis, an update regarding this issue will be provided during the 2nd Planning and Zoning Commission hearing. 20. The 53 acre Medium Density Residential parcel on the north side of Lambert Lane shall be restricted to a maximum density of 3 homes per acre, requires a minimum lot size of 6,600 square feet and requires a minimum of 10,000 square foot longs along the north side of Lambert Lane with a minimum of 15 feet between homes. Staff response: The 53-acre property, shown as Parcel H, has included these development standards in the applicant’s proposal. General Plan Vision The General Plan Vision states: "Oro Valley strives to be a well-managed community that provides all residents with opportunities for quality living. Oro Valley will keep its friendly, small-town, neighborly character, while increasing services, employment and recreation. The Town's lifestyle continues to be defined by a strong sense of community, a high regard for public safety and an extraordinary natural environment and scenic views" The applicant’s proposal is consistent with the General Plan vision by implementing a comprehensively planned and design area with residential, commercial and recreational elements. The Capella Planned Area Development (PAD) addresses impacts to traffic, viewsheds and natural op en space. The applicant’s proposal is consistent with the General Plan vision. General Plan Guiding Principles, Goals and Policies General Plan Guiding Principles, Goals and Policies are listed below in several major categories followed by staff response regarding the conformance of the applicant’s proposal. Master Planning Guiding Principle: Create a complete community with a broad range of shopping, dining and places to gather Goal D: A community with a wide range of services, amenities, shopping and dinging opportunities and housing types that meet the needs of current and future residents Policy CC.8: Foster development of complete neighborhoods with easy access to transportation and employment options, and commercial areas that offer amenities and s ervices for residents' daily needs Policy LU.8: Encourage the development of master planned communities which include suitable residential and commercial uses As stated above regarding the General Plan Vision, the applicant’s proposal represents a comprehensive, well planned design for the approximately 206-acre property with residential, commercial, recreation and open space areas and amenities. This design is consistent with the Guiding Principles, Goals and Policies listed above. Parks & Recreation Guiding Principle: Provide more parks, recreation and cultural opportunities for all ages Goal E: A high-quality parks, recreation and open space system that is accessible, comprehensive, connected and serves the community's needs Policy CC.4: Provide public open space and park space where there is an existing park shortage or a need to preserve open space, natural areas or scenic views. The applicant’s proposal includes a Master Parks & Recreation plan which includes three dedicated recreation areas with numerous amenities including turf areas, playgrounds, basketball court and dog parks. Further, numerous trails and multi-use paths provide additional connectivity throughout the Capella PAD area. The proposal is consistent with the Guiding Principles, Goals and Policies listed above. Open Space Goal V: Neighborhoods that include access and effective transitions to open space, recreation a nd schools and that are supported by shopping and services which meet daily needs Policy SD.2 Protect and provide connections between contiguous, environmentally sensitive lands within the Town, including key habitat areas and significant natural resource areas The most sensitive wash corridors which traverse the property have been primarily avoided and protected as Critical Resource Areas (CRA) which require 95% preservation. Additionally, an Environmentally Sensitive Open Space (ESOS) plan is incorporated into the PAD which includes minimum acreages required for CRA on each Development Guiding Principle: Manage how we grow and maintain high design standards Policy CC.7: Support the development of diverse housing types within the community Policy LU.5: Provide diverse land uses that meet the Town’s overall needs and effectively transition in scale and density adjacent to neighborhoods One of the primary benefits of a Planned Area Development is they generally include a comprehensive design aesthetic and theme. The applicant’s proposal includes this consistent treatment as well and will ensure the design of the entire PAD is consistent and complimentary with surrounding development. Additionally, the range of uses included in the PAD ensure a complimentary mix for existing and future residents. The layout of the Parcels have also accounted for potential impacts to existing development in the area and included mitigation measures to help minimize those concerns. Attachment 9 Capella PAD rezoning Zoning Code Conformance Analysis Planning and Zoning Commission March 6, 2018 Required and Specific Findings All new Planned Area Development’s (PAD) are required to be consistent with all of the following requirements, followed by staff response in italics: a. The PAD development is in accordance with the adopted Oro Valley General Plan and a minimum of eighty percent (80%) of the applicable General P lan criteria, as outlined in subsection G of this section, are satisfied. Staff response: The proposed PAD is consistent with this requirement as outlined in Section XV.I General Plan Policy Compliance Analysis. The Master Planned Community nature of the development includes a complimentary mix of uses as well as recreational opportunities and open space networks. b. The PAD demonstrates innovative design in site planning. c. The PAD fosters safe and efficient use of the land. Staff response: One of the primary benefits of master planning an area is the ability to plan and design adjacent parcels simultaneously. The ability to anticipate potential concerns, issues or impacts during the planning phase of a project provides an opportunity to address them up front. d. The development facilitates efficient design of public services and all infrastructure. Staff response: The applicant’s proposal includes both a Master Transportation Plan and a Master Utilities Plan to address the future infrastructure needs of the development. e. The development provides for adequate drainage and reduction of flood damage. Staff response: A majority of the most sensitive areas, the washes, within the PAD are preserved. These areas are the most likely to flood during major storm water events. f. The PAD encourages reduction in automobile trip lengths and trip consolidation as measured against development under conventional zoning. Staff response: The PAD encourages alternative modes of transportation by locating neighborhood serving commercial uses near residential areas connected by sidewalks, trails and multi-use paths. Further, a multi-use path system has been incorporated to provide a safe, convenient path for students walking to and from Ironwood Ridge High School. g. Public access to mass transit, pedestrian and bicycle circulation systems is provided and designed to assure that pedestrians can move safely and easily to properties and activities in the site and in the neighborhood. Staff response: As stated above, the PAD includes a number of trails, sidewalks and a multi- use path to provide additional pedestrian connectivity. h. The design and arrangement of elements of the site plan (e.g., building construction, orientation, and placement; selection and placement of landscape materials, and/o r use of renewable energy sources, etc.) contribute to the overall reduction of energy use by the project as measured against development under conventional zoning. Staff response: Locating complimentary uses near one another encourages people to use alternative modes of transportation, thereby helping to reduce energy consumption. i. The design and arrangement of elements of the site plan minimize adverse impacts to t he existing natural topography, natural water courses, existing desirable vegetation, and views. Staff response: A majority of the most sensitive areas, the washes, are preserved within the PAD. These area represent the highest concentration of natural flora and are frequently used by native animals. Further, the sites most significant saguaro ’s will be preserved in place where feasible, or transplanted on-site. j. The elements of the site plan display a rational relationship (e.g., buildings, circulation, open space, and landscaping) between land uses for the mutual benefit of the community and neighborhood. Staff response: The ability to Master Plan the area and anticipate potential concerns, issues or impacts during the planning phase of a project provides an opportunity to ensure the design is of mutual benefit to the community and the neighborhood. k. The PAD protects, in a manner equal or superior to existing zoning, existing neighborhoods from harmful encroachment by intrusive or disruptive development. Staff response: The property was the subject of an extensive General Plan Amendment process which established a number of mitigation measures for existing area residents. These measures have been incorporated into the applicant’s proposal. l. Overall, the entire PAD represents an improvement to living, work, and recreational conditions superior to that which would be produced by development under conventional zoning districts. Staff response: Again, one of the primary benefits of master planning an area is the ability to plan and design adjacent parcels simultaneously. The ability to anticipate potential concerns, issues or impacts during the planning phase of a project provides an opportunity to address them up front. This represents an improvement over conventional zoning addressing each parcel on an individual basis. Part XVI – Zoning Standard Modifications Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 188 1. Summary Table of Zoning Standard Modifications The following table summarizes the standards and provisions of the Oro Valley Zoning Code that the Capella Planned Area Development (PAD) modifies in their application to the Capella community. OVZCR Section Subject OVZCR Standard PAD Modification Rationale 1. 23.4 Table 23-2A C-N Building Height Parcel A Maximum Building Height 25’ or 2 stories. Maximum Building Height 24’, 2 stories. Lower height in accordance with GP Amendment and policy. 2. 23.8.B.2.a C-N Building Height Parcel A Buildings limited to 18’ within 85’ of residential district. Adjacent Common Areas can count toward that 85’. Allows more efficient use of site’s natural features as setback areas. 3. 23.8.B.1.d C-N Residential Use Parcel A Maximum 50% of site can be used for residential. All of site can be used for residential, subject to GP Policy. Residential only permitted as back up land use. Consistency with GP policy which supports 100% residential if the remainder of the PAD builds out residential. 4. 23.8.B.1.a C-N Commercial Floor Area Parcel A Floor area limits of 5,000 sq. ft. for each business with an increase to 9,000 square feet for the specific uses listed in 23.8.1.B.1.a; CUP required for anything larger. Floor area limited to 20,000 per business; CUP required for anything larger. Increases ability to attract businesses to Oro Valley by providing increased flexibility for commercial property users, broadens the range of potential commercial or service users. 5. 23.3 Table 23-1 C-1 Single- Family Use Parcel B Single family residential not permitted Single family permitted in accordance with GP policy as back up use Consistency of the PAD with GP policy allowing residential at project build out. 6. 23.4 Table 23-2A C-1 Building Height Parcel B Maximum building height is 25’ and 2 stories. Max Ht Anchors- 30’ Max Ht all others- 25’ Provide flexibility; encourage/reduce barriers for employment and retail uses; GP amendment requires enhanced buffering be provided along Naranja. 7. 23.7.E.2.a R-6 Open Space Parcels D & E 250 sq. ft. of outdoor living space required for each dwelling. Allows RMA ESOS credit for outdoor living space in HDR areas if adjacent to other qualifying ESOS. These areas can count toward RMA ESOS which is the least sensitive. Part XVI – Zoning Standard Modifications Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 189 8. 23.7.E.2.c R-6 Private Open Space Parcels D & E Provide private outdoor living area equal to 20% of dwelling unit floor area. Standard does not apply; 250 square feet of useable outdoor open space is already required for each dwelling. This standard is designed to ensure private outdoor space for apartment type dwellings. No apartments are permitted in Capella. Amounts of open space in Capella will generally exceed Town minimum standards. 9. 23.7.E.6.a R-6 Recreational Facilities Requires indoor recreation facility. No indoor recreation facility required as apartments are not permitted. Rec facilities provided in accordance w Town standards for single family homes. This standard is designed to ensure varied recreation facilities for apartment type dwellings. No apartments are permitted in Capella. The community will have a wide range of recreational facilities as specified in the PAD and the OVZCR. 10. 23.7.E.3.a R-6 Setbacks Parcels D & E Limits R-6 buildings to 18’ height within 100’ of R-1 Districts. Limits buildings to 18’ within 50’ of R-1 Districts. No apartment buildings are permitted which is the target of the 100’ required by code. Only single family detached and attached homes. 11. 23.7.E.2 R-6 Open Space Parcels D & E 35% of net lot (R-6 site) area required as open space. Open space will be provided in accordance with the ESOS Plan in the PAD for Parcels D and E and the adjoining areas. Further, open space for each Parcel is summarized in the PAD. The ESOS Plan, nearby recreation areas and open space on Parcels D and E will provide adequate open space in these somewhat denser areas of the PAD. No apartment development is permitted in the PAD. 12. 23.4 Table 23-2A R1-7 Minimum Lot Size Parcel H Minimum lot size is 7,000 sq. ft. Minimum lot size is 6,600 sq. ft.; lots adjacent to Lambert Lane must be 10,000 sq. ft. Provides flexibility in product builders can offer, improves affordability. Consistent with GPA Conditions of Approval. 13. 23.4 Table 23-2A R1-7 Minimum Lot Width Parcels A, B, D, E, H, K, L & M Minimum lot width is 70’. Minimum lot width is 55’. Provides lot design flexibility for deeper lots, larger yards; promotes efficient use of infrastructure-less roadway, water & sewer lines, fewer miles travelled. Consistent with town-adopted cluster development principles. Part XVI – Zoning Standard Modifications Capella Planned Area Development WLB No. 110028-A-003 190 14. 23.4 Table 23-2A R1-7 Setbacks Parcels A, B, D, E, H, K , L & M Minimum front setback is 20’. Minimum side setback is 7.5. Minimum front setback is 15’; minimum 20’ driveway required Minimum side setback is 5’ unless adjacent to Lambert Lane where 15’ between homes is required. Increase residential design flexibility and improves opportunities for articulation in structure. Also provides larger lots and setbacks in perimeter area along Lambert Lane. 15. 23.8.C.1 C-1 Site Design Parcel J Single user limited to 60,000 square feet, larger users allowed with CUP. Single user limited to 125,000 square feet as shown on the TDPs. Remove barrier to anchor users; located on regional transportation corridor. 16. 23.4 Table 23-2A C-1 Building Height Parcel J Maximum building height is 25’ and 2 stories. Max. building height for Anchors = 30’. Max. building height for all others = 25’. Provide flexibility; encourage/reduce barriers for employment use; enhanced buffering required along Naranja. 17. 27.10.D.3.f. 3.b ESOS Standards Setback is 15’; 20’ for wall, retaining walls, structures from ESOS areas. Setback is 5’ but with boulders or other protective barrier as approved by the Planning & Zoning Administrator to protect ESOS during construction. Provides flexibility and efficiency of land use for areas adjacent to ESOS areas. 18. 27.10 ESOS Standards Minimum ESOS requirements applied to each conceptual site plan for each development Parcel. Allow transfer of ESOS between development Parcels; maintains project wide required ESOS with tabulations. Provides for greater consolidation of open space as encouraged by ESL standards and the adopted General Plan. Allows for improved utilization of commercial parcels. Attachment 11 Capella PAD rezoning Zoning Code Modifications Analysis Planning and Zoning Commission March 6, 2018 The applicant’s proposed Zoning Code modifications are listed in tables below, followed by staff response. Parcel A Existing Code requirement Proposed Code modification Maximum building height in the C-N zoning district: 25 feet or 2 stories Parcel A maximum building height: 24 feet or 2 stories Staff response: The proposed reduction is required to meet a General Plan Special Area Policy. As such, staff supports this proposed modification. Existing Code requirement Proposed Code modification Buildings within 85 feet of a residential district are limited to 18 feet in the C-N zoning district Add that adjacent common areas count toward the 85 foot measurement Staff response: The adjacent common areas provide additional separation between existing residential buildings and the proposed development. As such, sufficient buffer will still be provided to minimize visual impacts on existing residential in the area. Staff supports this proposed modification. Existing Code requirement Proposed Code modification In the C-N zoning district, a maximum of 50% of the site may be used for residential 100% of the site may be used for residential Staff response: Use of the entire site for residential is required to meet a General Plan Special Area Policy. As such, staff supports this proposed modification. Existing Code requirement Proposed Code modification Maximum floor area limit of 5,000 sq. ft. per business, with exceptions up to 9,000 sq. ft. for certain business. CUP required for anything larger Maximum floor area limit of 20,000 sq. ft. per business. CUP for anything larger Staff response: The property is separated from existing residential by two arterial roadways and from future residential by a significant wash. As such, sufficient buffer exists’ to minimize impacts on residential in the area. The increase in floor area ratio will not adversely affect development in the area and staff supports this proposed modification. Parcel B Existing Code requirement Proposed Code modification Single-family residential is not permitted in the C-1 zoning district Single-family residential is permitted Staff response: The proposed addition of single-family residential as a permitted use is required to meet a General Plan Special Area Policy. As such, staff supports this proposed modification. Existing Code requirement Proposed Code modification Maximum building height in the C-1 zoning district is 25 feet or 2 stories Maximum building height: 30 feet for anchor spaces 25 feet for all others Staff response: The proposed modification is acceptable as the site is separated by a significant wash to the west and arterial roadways to the north and east. The existing separation will help minimize visual impacts on existing development in the area. As such, staff supports this proposed modification. Parcels D & E Existing Code requirement Proposed Code modification Minimum 250 sq. ft. of outdoor living space for each unit Allows this area to count toward open space calculations if adjacent to other qualifying areas Staff response: The required open space will be provided in larger more contiguous areas, rather than specific, individual unit allotments. As such, counting this acreage toward Environmentally Sensitive Open Space (ESOS) makes sense and is supported by staff. Existing Code requirement Proposed Code modification A minimum of 20% of a dwelling unit floor area must be provided as private outdoor living space Would not apply Staff response: The required private outdoor living space is truly a function of multi-family dwelling units (e.g. apartments). Apartments are expressly prohibited. As such, this requirement is unnecessary and is supported by staff. Existing Code requirement Proposed Code modification Requires an indoor recreation facility Would not apply Staff response: The required indoor recreation facility is also more a function of multi -family development (e.g. apartments). Apartments are expressly prohibited. As such, this requirement is unnecessary and is supported by staff. Existing Code requirement Proposed Code modification Buildings within 100 feet of residential development are limited to a maximum building height of 18 feet Would limit buildings within 50 feet of residential districts to 18 feet Staff response: Due to the location of these parcels (i.e. separated by arterial roadways from existing development) a more than sufficient buffer will be provided to help minimize visual impacts of the development. As such, this modification is supported by staff. Existing Code requirement Proposed Code modification 35% of the net lot area is required for open space Open space will be provided in accordance with the Environmentally Sensitive Open Space plan that is part of the PAD Staff response: A comprehensive plan for the required Environmentally Sensitive Open Space (ESOS) throughout the PAD is included and will apply to each and every parcel. As such, this plan is more holistic in its approach to open space and should therefore supersede this code requirement. Staff supports this modification. Parcel H Existing Code requirement Proposed Code modification Minimum lot size in the R1-7 zoning district: 7,000 sq. ft. Minimum lot size: 6,600 sq. ft. Home adjacent to Lambert Lane restricted to 10,000 sq. ft. Staff response: This reduction allows for more cluster development options which limit the development footprint and increase the amount of contiguous open space. Furthermore, this request is consistent with a Condition of Approval of the previous General Plan Amendment. As such, staff supports this request. Single-family Residential Parcels (A, B, D, E, H, K, L, M) Existing Code requirement Proposed Code modification Minimum lot width is 70 feet Minimum lot width is 55 feet Minimum front setback is 20 feet Minimum front setback is 15 feet (with at least 20 feet for a driveway) Minimum side setback is 7.5 feet Minimum side setback is 5 feet (except 15 feet when adjacent to Lambert Lane) Staff response: These reductions allow for more cluster development options which limit the development footprint and increase the amount of contiguous open space. As such, staff supports this request. Parcel J Existing Code requirement Proposed Code modification Single user limited to 60,000 sq. ft. CUP required for larger Single user limited to 125,000 sq. ft. as shown on TDP’s Staff response: This parcel has been identified on the Your Voice, Our Future General Plan as a future commercial area. With the widening of La Cholla Boulevard, this intersection is set to become more of a commercial center. As such, this modification is acceptable (as shown on the TDP’s) and is supported by staff. Environmentally Sensitive Open Space (ESOS) Standards Existing Code requirement Proposed Code modification Setback from ESOS areas is 15 feet & 20 feet for walls/structures Setback is 5 feet when protective barrier (e.g. boulders) is approved by the Planning & Zoning Administrator Minimum ESOS requirements per parcel Allow transfer of Resource Management Area (RMA) ESOS between development parcels as long as total is maintained throughout the PAD Staff response: These modifications allow for more upfront protection of sensitive ESOS areas and protection of larger, more contiguous areas throughout the PAD. As such, staff supports this request. Attachment 12 Capella PAD rezoning Tentative Development Plan Concepts Analysis Planning and Zoning Commission March 6, 2018 Parcel A Parcel A is approximately 8.2-acres in size and is one of two parcels which have a primary and “back-up” land use designation. The primary land use is for neighborhood commercial (C-N) uses to serve the surrounding areas. These uses typically include restaurants, general retail and/or office uses intended to serve the immediate area. However, supermarkets, car washes, gas stations auto service centers and convenience stores (e.g. Circle K) are expressly prohibited. Drive-thru uses may be permitted by Conditional Use Permit only. The development standards of the C-N zoning district shall apply with the following modifications:  Maximum building height: 24 feet, 2 stories o Buildings within 85 feet of residential zones to the north and west are limited to 18 feet  The arrangement of buildings and parking shown on the Tentative Development Plan Concepts meet the parking lot standards of the C-N zoning district. The “back-up” is for Medium Density Residential. This designation can only be utilized if all other residential in the Capella Planned Area Development (PAD) have been developed. A maximum of 30 units may be built on this parcel. Should this designation be used, the Medium Density Residential development standards of Parcel H are to be used. The Parcel H development standards that would apply to this parcel are the existing R1-7 zoning standards with the following exceptions:  Maximum building height: 25 feet, 2 stories (per condition of approval)  Minimum lot size: 6,600 sq. ft.  Minimum lot width: 55 feet  Minimum sides setback: 5 feet  Minimum front setback: 15 feet (minimum 20 feet required for driveway length) (per condition of approval) The applicant’s proposal includes 4 Tentative Development Plan Concepts (TDP’s). Three of the concepts depict commercial and/or office arrangements, while 1 is for a Medium Density Residential layout. Parcel B Parcel B is approximately 12.2-acres in size and is the second parcel which has a primary and “back-up” land use designation. The primary land use is for Community Commercial (C-1). These uses typically include restaurants, general retail and/or office uses intended to serve the immediate area and beyond. However, the following uses are prohibited:  Broadcasting stations  Fabric stores  Medical Marijuana dispensaries  Video Stores  Applicant repair stores  Laundromats  Car washes  Auto service centers  Major Communication Facilities; and  Convenience stores (e.g. Circle K) Drive-thru uses may be permitted by Conditional Use Permit only. The development standards of the C-1 zoning district shall apply with the following modifications:  Maximum building height: 30 feet for anchor spaces and office buildings; 25 feet otherwise  Additional architecture treatment to be incorporated into building designs for buildings in excess of 60,000 sq. ft.  The arrangement of buildings and parking shown on the Tentative Development Plan Concepts meet the parking lot standards of the C-1 zoning district.  Enhanced landscaping to be incorporated to screen loading zones along Sculptor Drive The “back-up” is for Medium Density Residential. This designation can only be utilized if all other residential in the Capella PAD have been developed. A maximum of 40 units may be built on this parcel. Should this designation be used, the Medium Density Residential development standards of Parcel H are to be used. The Parcel H development standards that would apply to this parcel are the existing R1-7 zoning standards with the following exceptions:  Maximum building height: 25 feet, 2 stories (per condition of approval)  Minimum lot size: 6,600 sq. ft.  Minimum lot width: 55 feet  Minimum sides setback: 5 feet  Minimum front setback: 15 feet (minimum 20 feet required for driveway length) (per condition of approval) The applicant’s proposal includes 5 Tentative Development Plan Concepts (TDP’s). Four of the concepts depict commercial and/or office arrangements, while 1 is for a Medium Density Residential layout. Parcel C This parcel is one of three recreation areas within the Capella PAD. This area will include a tot-lot, multiple ramada’s, a turf play area, trails and parking. Parcel D Parcel D is approximately 14-acres in size and is one of two parcels (Parcel E is the other) in the Capella PAD where high-density residential (not including apartments) may be permitted. A maximum gross density for both parcels is 12 units/acre or 396 units. This Parcel will use the existing R -6 zoning district development standards with the following exceptions:  Private outdoor living space is not required as apartment uses are not permitted, however all units will provide yards and/or patios.  Indoor recreational facilities are not required  A 50 foot setback is required for all building over 18 feet. The applicant’s proposal includes 4 Tentative Development Plan Concepts (TDP’s). Three of the concepts depict high density residential concepts (e.g. townhomes, condominiums), while 1 is for a Medium Density Residential layout. Should this parcel develop as Medium Density Residential, the development standards of Parcel H are to be utilized. The Parcel H development standards that would apply to this parcel are the existing R1-7 zoning standards with the following exceptions:  Maximum building height: 25 feet, 2 stories (per condition of approval)  Minimum lot size: 6,600 sq. ft.  Minimum lot width: 55 feet  Minimum sides setback: 5 feet  Minimum front setback: 15 feet (minimum 20 feet required for driveway length) (per condition of approval) Parcel E Parcel D is approximately 19-acres in size and is the second of two parcels in the Capella PAD where high-density residential (not including apartments) may be permitted. A maximum gross density for both parcels is 12 units/acre or 396 units. This Parcel will use the existing R-6 zoning district development standards with the following exceptions:  Private outdoor living space is not required as apartment uses are not permitted, however all units will provide yards and/or patios.  Indoor recreational facilities are not required  A 50 foot setback is required for all building over 18 feet. Should this parcel develop as Medium Density Residential, the development standards of Parcel H are to be utilized. The Parcel H development standards that would apply to this parcel are the existing R1-7 zoning standards with the following exceptions:  Maximum building height: 25 feet, 2 stories (per condition of approval)  Minimum lot size: 6,600 sq. ft.  Minimum lot width: 55 feet  Minimum sides setback: 5 feet  Minimum front setback: 15 feet (minimum 20 feet required for driveway length) (per condition of approval) Should the parcel develop as an expansion of the Casas Adobes Baptist Church, the following additional modifications shall apply:  Maximum building height: 28 feet (maximum 36 feet for gymnasium)  Senior care facilities associated with the Church are permitted The applicant’s proposal includes 5 Tentative Development Plan Concepts (TDP’s). Three of the concepts depict high density residential concepts (e.g. townhomes, condominiums), 1 is for a Medium Density Residential layout and 1 is for a future expansion of the Casas Adobes Baptist Church campus. Parcel F This parcel is the second of three recreation areas within the Capella Planned Area Development (PAD). This area will include a tot-lot, playground, multiple ramada’s, two turf play area, a basketball court, restrooms, a par course, trails and parking. Parcel G This parcel is the third of three recreation areas within the Capella Planned Area Development (PAD). This area will include a playground, multiple ramada’s, a turf play area, dog parks (both small and large dog), trails and parking. Parcel H Parcel H is approximately 52.8-acres in size and is intended solely for Medium Density Residential development. A maximum of 158 units may be built on this parcel. The development standards that would apply to this parcel are the existing R1-7 zoning standards with the following exceptions:  Maximum building height: 25 feet, 2 stories (per condition of approval) expect that within 300 feet of Lambert Lane building height is limited to 20 feet or 1-story  Minimum lot size: 6,600 sq. ft.  Minimum lot width: 55 feet  Minimum sides setback: 5 feet  Minimum front setback: 15 feet (minimum 20 feet required for driveway length) (per condition of approval)  Perimeter bufferyards with enhanced vegetation shall be used to reduce visual impacts along Lambert Lane. The applicant’s proposal includes only 1 Tentative Development Plan Concept (TDP’s) for this parcel which is for a Medium Density Residential detached layout. Parcel J Parcel J is approximately 18.9-acres and is intended for Community Commercial (C-1) type uses. These uses typically include restaurants, general retail and/or office uses intended to serve the immediate area and beyond, including any conditional uses depicted on the associated Tentative Development Plan Concepts (TDP’s). Any conditional use not depicted on a TDP on this parcel would require a Conditional Use Permit. This Parcel will use the existing C-1 zoning district development standards with the following exceptions:  Maximum building height: 30 feet for anchor buildings and 25 feet for all others o Architectural elements (e.g. bell towers, parapet walls, etc) may exceed by no more than 10 feet  The arrangement of buildings and parking shown on the Tentative Development Plan Concepts meet the parking lot standards of the C-1 zoning district.  Additional architectural treatment to be incorporated into buildings in excess of 60,000 sq. ft. to diminish the building mass  Enhanced vegetation/screening required where loading zones are oriented toward residential development. The applicant’s proposal includes 3 TDP’s, all of which are commercial center layouts. Parcel K Parcel K is approximately 27.4-acres in size and is intended solely for Medium Density Residential development. A maximum of 55 units may be built on this parcel. The development standards that would apply to this parcel are the existing R1-7 zoning standards with the following exceptions:  Maximum building height: 20 feet, 1 stories  Minimum lot size: 6,600 sq. ft.  Minimum sides setback: 5 feet  Minimum front setback: 15 feet (minimum 20 feet required for driveway length) (per condition of approval)  Perimeter bufferyards with enhanced vegetation shall be used to reduce visual impacts for existing residential to the west. The applicant’s proposal includes only 1 Tentative Development Plan Concept (TDP’s) for this parcel which is for a Medium Density Residential detached layout. Parcel L Parcel L is approximately 21-acres in size and is intended for either Medium Density Residential of a future expansion of Casas Adobe Baptist Church. A maximum of 42 units may be built on this parcel. The development standards that would apply to this parcel are the existing R1-7 zoning standards with the following exceptions:  Maximum building height: 25 feet, 2 stories (per condition of approval); except portion within the 300 feet of perimeter which is restricted to 20 feet/ 1-story  Minimum lot size: 6,600 sq. ft.  Minimum sides setback: 5 feet  Minimum front setback: 15 feet (minimum 20 feet required for driveway length) (per condition of approval)  Perimeter bufferyards with enhanced vegetation shall be used to reduce visual impacts for existing residential to the west. The applicant’s proposal includes 2 Tentative Development Plan Concept (TDP’s ) for this parcel. The first is for a Medium Density Residential detached layout and the second is for a future expansion of the Casas Adobes Baptist Church campus. Parcel M Parcel M is approximately 24-acres in size and is intended solely for Medium Density Residential development. A maximum of 48 units may be built on this parcel. The development standards that would apply to this parcel are the existing R1-7 zoning standards with the following exceptions:  Maximum building height: 25 feet, 2 stories (per condition of approval); except portion within the 300 feet of perimeter which is restricted to 20 feet/ 1-story  Minimum lot size: 6,600 sq. ft.  Minimum sides setback: 5 feet  Minimum front setback: 15 feet (minimum 20 feet required for driveway length) (per condition of approval)  Perimeter bufferyards with enhanced vegetation shall be used to reduce visual impacts for existing residential to the west. The applicant’s proposal includes only 1 Tentative Development Plan Concept (TDP’s) for this parcel which is for a Medium Density Residential detached layout. Neighborhood Meeting Summary Capella Rezoning June 8, 2016 6:00 – 7:30 PM Casas Adobes Church 1. Introductions and welcome Meeting Facilitator Chad Daines, Principal Planner, introduced the Oro Valley staff Rosevelt Arellano, Senior Planner, as project manager. Approximately 70 residents and interested parties attended the meeting, including Councilmembers Hornat, Zinkin, Vice Mayor Waters and appointed officials Barrett, Hurt, Gribb and Swope. 2. Staff presentation Rosevelt Arellano, Senior Planner, provided a presentation that included:  Property information o Location, size and surrounding land uses  Applicant’s request o Rezoning to Planned Area Development o Tentative Development Plan o Other development standards for consideration o Drainage and traffic  Project history o Approved Major General Plan Amendment o Adopted Special Area Plan Policies  Public Outreach Plan o 1st neighborhood meeting o Focus meetings o Subsequent neighborhood meeting(s)  Review tools  Review process o 1st neighborhood meeting o Formal submittal o Focus neighborhood meetings o Subsequent neighborhood meeting(s) o 1st Planning and Zoning Commission hearing o 2nd Planning and Zoning Commission hearing (recommendation) o Town Council hearing (decision) 3. Applicant presentation Paul Oland of the WLB Group, provided a presentation detailing the applicant’s proposal, which included:  Site plan design  Conformance with adopted Special Area Plan Policies 4. Public Questions and Comments Traffic/Drainage  Neighbors expressed a significant concern with the traffic capacity on Naranja Drive.  Neighbors expressed a concern with traffic crossing La Cholla Boulevard to Canada Hills Drive. o A Special Area Plan Policy prohibits traffic to cross La Cholla Boulevard directly from the development to Canada Hills Drive.  Will the future traffic generated by this development require Lambert Lane to be widened? o The Town Engineer must review a traffic report to determine any impacts to the road and associated improvements are needed. This report will be submitted as part of the pending rezoning application.  What is the development schedule for the La Cholla Boulevard expansion? o Construction will begin in 2017 and is expected to be completed in two years.  Will the proposed development create drainage issues for the surrounding properties? o The applicant must submit a drainage study with their pending rezoning application. This study must demonstrate that the proposed development is designed in a way that drainage after the property is developed flows in a similar way to how it did before it was developed. Site Plan Design  Can the applicant destroy the existing vegetation on the property? o No. The applicant must submit a plant mitigation plan(s) to determine the allowable disturbance areas and required mitigation.  A comment was made against the existing landscaping located directly north and adjacent to the Estate at Capella subdivision. Land Use  What is the existing zoning? o R1-144 (1 home per 144,000 square feet of land)  Neighbors expressed concerns with the viability of the proposed commercial development.  A comment was made against the medium and high density residential land uses.  What is the land use designation for the property located immediately north of the project site (northwest corner of Naranja Drive and La Cholla Boulevard)? o Medium Density Residential (2.1 – 5.0 dwelling units per acre)  What is the difference between a townhome and apartment use? o The main difference is apartments are intended to be renter-occupied, and townhomes are intended to be owner-occupied.  Can the Town Council deny the rezoning request? o Yes. Neighborhood Impacts  When can the applicant begin construction? o The applicant can begin construction after the Town hires a contractor for the La Cholla Boulevard expansion project?  Why does the property have a for-sale sign? o The applicant responded that the purpose of the for-sale sign is to generate interest.  What is the process to amend or delete a Special Area Plan Policy? o The process includes the submittal and approval of a Major General Plan Amendment application. The submittal window of April 30th has passed, and the applicant can submit a request next year. As of today, the applicant does not proposed to amend or delete any policy.  Does the Town have enough water to support the proposed development? o Yes. For additional information, staff will post a handout from the Oro Valley Water Department on the project website.  Does the surrounding schools have sufficient capacity for the future children living in this development? o The applicant stated that they are working with the Amphi School District to ensure sufficient capacity. Mr. Daines closed the meeting, thanked everyone for their attendance and informed neighbors of the upcoming focus meetings. Mr. Daines also encouraged everyone to contact Mr. Arellano, the project manager, with any additional thoughts, comments or concerns. Focus Meeting 1: La Cholla Blvd. Neighborhood Meeting Summary Capella Rezoning October 17, 2017 6:00 – 7:30 PM Casas Adobes Church 1. Introductions and welcome Meeting Facilitator Michael Spaeth, Principal Planner, introduced himself as the Town’s project manager. Approximately 9 residents and interested parties attended the meeting, including the Planning and Zoning Commission Chairman, Mr. Charlie Hurt. 2. Staff presentation Michael Spaeth, Current Planning Principal Planner, provided a presentation that included:  Background of the property, including project history  Property information  Applicant’s request  La Cholla Blvd. widening project  Review tools  Conformance with the General Plan and the Special Area Policies  Next steps in the process 3. Applicant presentation Paul Oland of the WLB Group, provided a presentation detailing the applicant’s proposal, which included:  Site plan design for individual Parcels along La Cholla Boulevard  Conformance with adopted Special Area Plan Policies 4. Public Questions and Comments Listed below is a summary of the topics discussed: 1. Cross traffic at Cañada Hills Drive. Discussion regarding the Town Engineer’s public safety concern of the Special Area Policy regarding Cañada Hills Drive. 2. The type of perimeter walls that will be constructed. 3. Ultimate design of La Cholla Boulevard. 4. Interest in seeing development perspectives from La Cholla Boulevard. View cross sections. 5. Ingress and egress movements onto Naranja Drive, especially when school is in session. 6. Proposed height of the future Gymnasium on Parcel E. 7. Timing of future traffic light installations. When will it be warranted? Seems like it already should be. 8. Drainage from wash across La Cholla Blvd. Adequacy of ultimate design to handle big storms. 9. Developer should be required to include ball fields. 10. Traffic circulation network should also connect to Lambert Ln. & Naranja Dr. Not just La Cholla. Mr. Spaeth closed the meeting, thanked everyone for their attendance and informed neighbors of the upcoming focus meetings. Attendees were also encouraged to contact Mr. Spaeth, the Town’s project manager, with any additional thoughts, comments or concerns. Focus Meeting 2: Neighbors south of the subject property Neighborhood Meeting Summary Capella Rezoning October 24, 2017 6:00 – 7:30 PM Casas Adobes Church 1. Introductions and welcome Meeting Facilitator Michael Spaeth, Principal Planner, introduced himself as the Town’s project manager. Approximately 4 residents and interested parties attended the meeting. 2. Staff presentation Michael Spaeth, Current Planning Principal Planner, provided a presentation that included:  Background of the property, including project history  Property information  Applicant’s request  La Cholla Blvd. widening project  Review tools  Conformance with the General Plan and the Special Area Policies  Next steps in the process 3. Applicant presentation Paul Oland of the WLB Group, provided a presentation detailing the applicant’s proposal, which included:  Site plan design for individual Parcels along Lambert Lane  Conformance with adopted Special Area Plan Policies 4. Public Questions and Comments Listed below is a summary of the topics discussed: 1. Future grocer on Parcel J could be detrimental to overall community. 2. Who makes the ultimate decision on the proposed rezoning? 3. Will all development scenarios be approved? 4. Anticipated mix for High Density Residential parcels 5. Has a homebuilder been identified? 6. Funding for La Cholla Blvd. widening project. 7. Impacts to drainage/runoff. 8. Anticipated timing of development 9. Impacts of scarred land if left undeveloped 10. Traffic capacity related to Lambert Ln. widening project. Mr. Spaeth closed the meeting, thanked everyone for their attendance and informed neighbors of the upcoming focus meetings. Attendees were also encouraged to contact Mr. Spaeth, the Town’s project manager, with any additional thoughts, comments or concerns. Focus Meeting 3: Neighbors west of the subject property Neighborhood Meeting Summary Capella Rezoning October 26, 2017 6:00 – 7:30 PM Casas Adobes Church 1. Introductions and welcome Meeting Facilitator Michael Spaeth, Principal Planner, introduced himself as the Town’s project manager. Approximately 4 residents and interested parties attended the meeting, including Councilmember Rodman and the Planning and Zoning Commission Chairman, Charlie Hurt . 2. Staff presentation Michael Spaeth, Current Planning Principal Planner, provided a presentation that included:  Background of the property, including project history  Property information  Applicant’s request  La Cholla Blvd. widening project  Review tools  Conformance with the General Plan and the Special Area Policies  Next steps in the process 3. Applicant presentation Paul Oland of the WLB Group, provided a presentation detailing the applicant’s proposal, which included:  Site plan design for individual Parcels along the west side of the subject property  Conformance with adopted Special Area Plan Policies 4. Public Questions and Comments Listed below is a summary of the topics discussed: 1. Anticipated timing of development 2. Anticipated plans for the parcels owned by Casas church. 3. Building height impacts 4. Phasing of the project 5. Has a homebuilder been identified? 6. Concerns regarding impacts to the area. 7. Naranja Rd. widening project was insufficient. Worried La Cholla will be too. Mr. Spaeth closed the meeting, thanked everyone for their attendance and informed neighbors of the upcoming focus meetings. Attendees were also encouraged to contact Mr. Spaeth, the Town’s project manager, with any additional thoughts, comments or concerns. Focus Meeting 4: Neighbors in Estates at Capella Neighborhood Meeting Summary Capella Rezoning November 2, 2017 6:00 – 7:30 PM Casas Adobes Church 1. Introductions and welcome Meeting Facilitator Michael Spaeth, Principal Planner, introduced himself as the Town’s project manager. Approximately 4 residents and interested parties attended the meeting, including Councilmember Rodman and the Planning and Zoning Commission Member, Bob Swope. 2. Staff presentation Michael Spaeth, Current Planning Principal Planner, provided a presentation that included:  Background of the property, including project history  Property information  Applicant’s request  La Cholla Blvd. widening project  Review tools  Conformance with the General Plan and the Special Area Policies  Next steps in the process 3. Applicant presentation Paul Oland of the WLB Group, provided a presentation detailing the applicant’s proposal, which included:  Site plan design for individual Parcels along the west side of the subject property  Conformance with adopted Special Area Plan Policies 4. Public Questions and Comments Listed below is a summary of the topics discussed: 1. Anticipated timing of development 2. Anticipated plans for the parcels owned by Casas church. 3. Phasing of the project 4. Has a homebuilder been identified? 5. Concerns regarding impacts to the area. Mr. Spaeth closed the meeting, thanked everyone for their attendance and informed neighbors of the upcoming focus meetings. Attendees were also encouraged to contact Mr. Spaeth, the Town’s project manager, with any additional thoughts, comments or concerns. From: Ihor Kunasz <ihor.kunasz@me.com> Sent: Monday, October 16, 2017 4:33 PM To: Spaeth, Michael Cc: Ihor kunasz Subject: LaCholla/Naranja rezoning. There are severl concerns about the rezoning. While the number of homes may represent additional taxes for Pima/Oro Valley, has an Evironmental Impact Statement been prepared and reviewed? As we concstantly reminded to conserve water and predictions about reduced recharge because of potentially lower monsson rains, has the impact of providing water for 500 homes been made? Charging for hookups may meanmore $ into Oro Valley coffers, it doesnot add water to the ground water system. Finally, Oro Valley is presented as and ideal town for settling in. 500 homes vs 60 will make Oro Valley look like a cramped place and certainly lead to traffic congestion, more police protection…… I urge the council to reject the plan. Ihor Kunasz 10960 N. Stargazer Drive Oro Valley AZ 520 877-9171 From: Cindy Fisher Campano <ccampano23@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2017 6:21 PM To: Spaeth, Michael Subject: Naranja and La Cholla Development Good Evening! Unfortunately I’m unable to attend the meeting tonight where the new proposal is being discussed. I am opposed to these recommended changes as I do not see that they truly benefit Oro Valley but more for the developer. Please share with me if there is another vote since I just recently heard about this proposal. Thank you so much. Cindy Campano Resident of OV - Villages of La Canada Planning & Zoning Commission AGENDA ITEM: 3. Meeting Date: 03/06/2018 Requested by: Bayer Vella, Community Development & Public Works Submitted By: Michael Spaeth, Community Development & Public Works Case Number: OV1601793 SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSSION REGARDING A PROPOSED REZONING FROM R1-144 TO PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT FOR APPROXIMATELY 199-ACRES LOCATED WEST OF LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD BETWEEN LAMBERT LANE AND NARANJA DRIVE AND 8.2-ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD AND NARANJA DRIVE, OV1601793 RECOMMENDATION: This meeting is for discussion purposes only and formal action will be taken during the 2nd required Planning and Zoning Commission meeting tentatively scheduled for April 3, 2018. Staff will recommend approval of the applicant's proposal, pending final review of the traffic impact anaylsis and subject to the conditions (draft provided as Attachment 1), during that meeting. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The purpose of this request is to discuss a proposed rezoning application (Attachment 2) from R1-144 (large lot residential) to Planned Area Development (PAD) for the following properties: •199-acres located west of La Cholla Boulevard between Lambert Lane and Naranja Drive •8.2-acres located on the northwest corner of La Cholla Boulevard and Naranja Drive The intent of the proposal is to facilitate development of a comprehensively planned project on approximately 207-acres (Attachment 3), which includes residential, commercial, recreation and quasi-public (Church expansion) development. A General Plan Amendment was approved for the site in 2015 which serves as the foundation for the applicants proposal. The extent of outreach and public participation was extraordinary and resulted in a number of parameters regarding future development that are more appropriately defined at the rezoning stage. The General Plan amendment process led to the development of a Long Range Conceptual Master Plan (Attachment 4) and numerous Special Area Policies (Attachment 5). Both include more design detail than any other General Plan amendment to date. As a result, design oriented policies/mapping (location of recreation areas, access, building heights etc.) were adopted that guide the rezoning Tentative Development Plan. The proposed rezoning is consistent with both the General Plan Long Range Conceptual Master Plan and the Special Area Policies -- pending final review of the Traffic Impact Analysis. The Town and consultant's engineers are still working on means to address the following Special Area Policy in a manner to best ensure public safety: "Traffic shall not be allowed to cross La Cholla Boulevard directly from the development to Canada Hills Drive" The applicant's proposal is unique in that it includes multiple "Tentative Development Plan Concepts" (Attachment 6) which afford the property owner additional flexibility in the future. All individual concepts are in conformance with Zoning Code requirements. As a new Planned Area Development (PAD), two separate public hearings are required. The primary purpose of this first public hearing is to introduce the application, answer questions from the Planning and Zoning Commission, and provide another opportunity for neighbor testimony. Per code, no vote will be taken by the Commission during this meeting. A second public hearing is tentatively scheduled for April 3, 2018 (pending Town Engineer approval of the Traffic Impact Analysis) and the Commission will consider making a recommendation to Town Council. BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: A. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND CONTEXT Land Use Context The General Plan land use designation for the property is Master Planned Community (MPC). This designation represents areas where comprehensively planned developments are intended. As stated previously, this project was the subject of an extensive public input process during the preceding General Plan Amendment which resulted in the Long Range Conceptual Master Plan (Attachment 4) and Special Area Policies (Attachment 5). The existing zoning for the property is R1-144 which accommodates large-lot detached single-family residential development. The land use designation and zoning for the property and the surrounding area is provided in Attachment 7. Site Conditions •207 acres •Property is vacant. However, the site surrounds the existing Casas Adobes Baptist Church •Characterized by several wash corridors Previous Approvals •2002: The property was annexed into the Town of Oro Valley Page 1 of 6Print Staff Report 3/1/2018http://agenda.orovalleyaz.gov:8085/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=2499&rev_num=0&mode=Ex... Proposed Use(s) by Parcel PARCEL PROPOSED LAND USE(S) Parcel A Neighborhood Commercial/Office (C-N) or Medium Density Single-family Residential Parcel B Community Commercial (C-1) or Medium Density Single-family Residential Parcel C Recreation Parcel D High Density Residential Parcel E High Density Residential or Church Expansion Parcel F Recreation Parcel G Recreation Parcel H Medium Density Single-family Residential Parcel J Community Commercial (C-1) Parcel K Low Density Single-family Residential Parcel L Low Density Single-family Residential or Church Expansion Parcel M Low Density Single-family Residential •2015: A Major General Plan Amendment was approved by Town Council which established the Master Planned Community designation and the Special Area Policies B. APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL The request is to rezone the property from R1-144 (large lot residential) to Planned Area Development (PAD). The purpose of a PAD zoning district is to "...foster development which is superior to that which may occur under conventional zoning regulations...". As such, the applicant's proposal is to establish the approximately 207-acre property as comprehensively designed project known as the Capella PAD. The request includes a number of underlying zoning designations which are summarized in the table below: It is important to note the underlying zoning designations are consistent with the Long Range Conceptual Master Plan (Attachment 4) established as part of the previous General Plan Amendment process. In addition, the proposal also includes the necessary infrastructure (roads, sewer and trails) improvements required for future development. C. GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE ANALYSIS Rezoning applications are reviewed for conformance with the Your Voice, Our Future General Plan Land Use Map, Vision, Guiding Principles, Goals and Policies. The subject property is designated Master Planned Community (MPC) which is defined as: "Areas where large developments with a mix of uses is planned and developed in a comprehensive manner with a unified design theme. Developments in this land use designation generally provide a range of uses including a variety of housing options, shopping and employment opportunities and recreational amenities with a safe and efficient network for automobiles, bicycles and pedestrians." The rezoning request is consistent with the Master Planned Community land use designation as it incorporates a comprehensively planned design for the entire 207-acres including cohesive parcel layouts, recreation areas, open space and safe, convenient connectivity for both motorized and non-motorized travel. Additional detail is provided in Attachment 8. The General Plan vision: "Oro Valley strives to be a well-managed community that provides all residents with opportunities for quality living. Oro Valley will keep its friendly, small-town, neighborly character, while increasing services, employment and recreation. The Town's lifestyle continues to be defined by a strong sense of community, a high regard for public safety and an extraordinary natural environment and scenic views" The proposed rezoning is consistent with the General Plan Vision as the request establishes a complimentary mix of zoning designations to provide a complete community within this area, including residential, commercial, office and recreational opportunities. Furthermore, in adhering to the Special Area Policies previously established, the design takes into account the need for open space preservation and protection of scenic views. The General Plan also includes Guiding Principles, Goals and Policies which inform policy and development decisions within the Town. In sum, the proposed rezoning does conform with the intent of the Principles, Goals and Policies. Several applicable Principles, Goals and Policies regarding the applicant's request are listed below: •Guiding Principle: Create a complete community with a broad range of shopping, dining and places to gather •Guiding Principle: Manage how we grow and maintain high design standards •Guiding Principle: Provide more parks, recreation and cultural opportunities for all ages •Goal D: A community with a wide range of services, amenities, shopping and dinging opportunities and housing types that meet the needs of current and future residents •Goal E: A high-quality parks, recreation and open space system that is accessible, comprehensive, connected and serves the community's needs •Goal V: Neighborhoods that include access and effective transitions to open space, recreation and schools and that are supported by shopping and services which meet daily needs •Policy CC.4: Provide public open space and park space where there is an existing park shortage or a need to preserve open space, natural areas or scenic views •Policy CC.7: Support the development of diverse housing types within the community Page 2 of 6Print Staff Report 3/1/2018http://agenda.orovalleyaz.gov:8085/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=2499&rev_num=0&mode=Ex... •Policy CC.8: Foster development of complete neighborhoods with easy access to transportation and employment options, and commercial areas that offer amenities and services for residents' daily needs •Policy LU.8: Encourage the development of master planned communities which include suitable residential and commercial uses Long Range Conceptual Master Plan The Long Range Conceptual Master Plan (Attachment 4) developed as part of the preceding General Plan Amendment process established the future locations of all the underlying zoning districts. The applicant's proposal is consistent with this plan and mirrors the Conceptual Plan previously approved. Special Area Policies The Special Area Policies (Attachment 5) developed during the previous General Plan Amendment process serve as the foundation for this rezoning proposal. The proposal is consistent with the Special Area Policies; however, work to achieve compliance with the following one is ongoing: "Traffic shall not be allowed to cross La Cholla Boulevard directly from the development to Canada Hills Drive" Upon review of the applicant's first submittal, both the Town Engineer and the Town's Police Chief had safety concerns. Staff is working with the applicant to develop options to comply and achieve safe conditions. The applicant is currently finalizing an updated Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) which will include additional detail regarding this issue. A final recommendation regarding policy conformance will be presented during the second Planning and Zoning Commission Public Hearing. A more detailed analysis of the proposals conformance with the General Plan Land Use designation, Guiding Principles, Goals and Policies, as well as the Special Area Policies, is provided in Attachment 8. General Plan Criteria in the Zoning Code The Zoning Code also emphasizes conformance with the General Plan for all new Planned Area Developments (PAD). All new PAD's are required to be in conformance with at least 80% of the applicable General Plan criteria from the following elements: •Land Use •Transportation •Economic Development •Public Services and Facilities •Community Design •Open Space/Recreation •Natural Resources Conservation •Safety •Cultural/Historic The applicant's proposal is consistent with this requirement. D. ZONING CODE CONFORMANCE ANALYSIS The applicant's proposal was reviewed for conformance with the Town's Zoning Code, including the specific criteria for new Planned Area Developments (PAD). New Planned Area Development criteria In addition to General Plan conformance, the Zoning Code establishes specific criteria for all new Planned Area Development (PAD) proposals. This criteria includes conformance with required and specific findings and permissible zoning code modifications. Details regarding the proposal's conformance with this criteria is provided below. Required and Specific Zoning Findings The proposal is also required to be consistent with all required findings and any applicable specific findings. The purpose of the findings is to assure the intent of the Planned Area Development zoning district - "...to foster development which is superior to that which may occur under conventional zoning regulations..."- is achieved. The findings cover a variety of topics including community design, efficient use of infrastructure, connectivity and open space. The proposed rezoning is consistent with all required findings as well as any applicable specific findings. A more detailed analysis of the proposals conformance with the findings is provided in Attachment 9. Zoning Code Modifications The proposal also includes a number of modifications from existing zoning code standards (Attachment 10). Again, the purpose of the Planned Area Development zoning district is "...to foster development which is superior to that which may occur under conventional zoning regulations...". The proposed modifications help meet this superior design as they provide more flexibility for the property owner, while minimizing potential impacts to nearby property owners. As such, the modifications are acceptable and are supported by Town staff. A more detailed analysis of the requested modifications is provided in Attachment 11. Tentative Development Plan Concepts All rezoning applications require a rezoning Tentative Development Plan (TDP) which establishes the future design of the property, including the subdivision or commercial area designs, the circulation network (vehicular, bicycle & pedestrian) and open space areas. The applicant's proposal represents a unique approach to the rezoning Tentative Development Plan (TDP) requirement, though similar to the Oro Valley Town Center Planned Area Development (San Dorado development), which affords the applicant more flexibility in the future. The rezoning includes multiple "Tentative Development Plan Concepts" (Attachment 6) as indicated in the table below: Page 3 of 6Print Staff Report 3/1/2018http://agenda.orovalleyaz.gov:8085/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=2499&rev_num=0&mode=Ex... Proposed use(s) by Parcel PARCEL PROPOSED LAND USES(S) # OF DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS Parcel A Neighborhood Commercial/Office (C-N) or Medium Density Residential 4 (3 commercial/office & 1 residential) Parcel B Community Commercial (C-1) or Medium Density Residential 5 (4 commercial & 1 residential) Parcel C Recreation 1 Parcel D High Density Residential or Medium Density Residential 4 (3 attached residential & 1 detached residential) Parcel E High Density Residential, Medium Density Residential or Church Expansion 5 (3 attached residential & 1 detached residential & 1 church expansion) Parcel F Recreation 1 Parcel G Recreation 1 Parcel H Medium Density Single-family Residential 1 Parcel J Community Commercial (C-1)3 Parcel K Low Density Residential 1 Parcel L Low Density Residential or Church Expansion 2 (1 residential & 1 church expansion) Parcel M Low Density Residential 1 Each of the proposed individual concepts are in conformance with all Zoning Code requirements. A more detailed analysis of the Tentative Development Plan Concepts is provided in Attachment 12. Typically, site plans submitted following a rezoning must be in substantial conformance with the Tentative Development Plan (TDP) or reconsideration by Town Council is required.The Planned Area Development (PAD) includes its own conformance criteria, with three separate levels of conformance, which are described below: Substantial Conformance When a site plan is in substantial conformance with the Tentative Development Plan Concepts it may proceed directly to the Final Site Plan stage of review which may be approved administratively. Substantial conformance means there are no changes to any material terms or conditions of the rezoning, including changes to the following: •Permitted Uses •Development Standards or Zoning Conditions related to: ◦Building height ◦Perimeter setbacks ◦Open space ◦Floor Area Ratios ◦Density This criteria is consistent with the existing code language used for determining conformance with rezoning Tentative Development Plans. In this scenario, the site plan is consistent enough to a previously reviewed plan, additional public review is not necessary. General Conformance When a site plan is generally consistent with the Tentative Development Plan Concepts, however it includes a 25% increase to any of the requirements listed below, the site plan will require consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission and Town Council. The requirements include: •Increase in building gross floor area by more than 25% •Major alterations to circulation patterns as determined by the Town Engineer and Planning and Zoning Administrator •Modification of 25% or more of the parking spaces or parking lot area The above criteria is consistent with existing code language that is used to determine conformance of proposed modifications to existing site plans. In this scenario, though the site plan is generally consistent with the previously reviewed plans, enough modification has been proposed that additional public review is necessary. Non-Conformance When a site plan includes a significant deviation from the Tentative Development Plan Concepts, it will require an amendment to the Planned Area Development (PAD) and consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission and Town Council. Significant deviation includes changes to the following: •Permitted Uses •Access points •Circulation patterns •Development intensity Page 4 of 6Print Staff Report 3/1/2018http://agenda.orovalleyaz.gov:8085/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=2499&rev_num=0&mode=Ex... In this scenario, the site plan deviates enough from the rezoning Tentative Development Plan Concepts, additional public review of the rezoning is necessary. Engineering Comments Drainage - The proposed rezoning request acknowledges the various development areas included within the PAD will be designed so post-developed drainage conditions are consistent with pre-developed conditions in accordance with Town drainage requirements. Multiple natural washes flowing in a southerly direction affect the development areas. Furthermore, an existing FEMA mapped floodplain exists within one of the washes that runs along development areas E, H and J. A preliminary drainage analysis was prepared by the applicant to determine existing 100-year stormwater runoff values flowing through each wash, at points entering and exiting the project boundaries. The drainage systems for each development area will be designed to ensure, among other requirements, that all proposed habitable and commercial buildings adjacent to washes will be protected from flooding and erosion. The increase of runoff resulting from constructed impervious surfaces will be mitigated by use of detention basins which discharge into the existing watercourses. The detention basins capture, hold, and release stormwater in a controlled manner to mimic existing conditions. Detailed drainage studies will be done at the final site planning stage for each development area as they occur. General Traffic - The proposed master planned development will have primary access points along La Cholla Boulevard, Naranja Drive, Lambert Lane and Cross Road. There will also be a number of new roads within the development which will provide access and distribute incoming and outgoing traffic throughout the various development areas. A detailed traffic impact analysis was provided with the Site Analysis to evaluate the effect of additional traffic on surrounding roadways. The generation of new traffic from the various development areas will vary from lower volumes in less intense use areas (e.g., residential subdivisions) to moderately higher levels in more intense use areas (e.g., commercial). Internal streets, access drives and parking areas within the development areas will be constructed to Town code standards. Off-site improvements will include widening in areas for turn lanes where warranted along the project frontages by the developer. Public roadway improvements to be completed by the developer shall be at their expense and will require approval and a permit issued from the Town Engineer’s office. Furthermore, detailed traffic impact analysis updates will be required at the final site planning stage for each development area as they occur. Cañada Hills Drive Intersection - There is a General Plan policy applicable to the Capella project which states that traffic shall not be allowed to cross La Cholla Boulevard directly from the Capella PAD area to Cañada Hills Drive, which is a private street. The Town Engineer is working with the developer to design the west side of the intersection in a manner to meet the condition of the General Plan policy and ensure public safety. A primary concern is to design a safe means to make left-turns out of the Canada Hills subdivision to go southbound on La Cholla Boulevard. La Cholla Widening - Construction for the widening of La Cholla Boulevard to four lanes, as funded by the RTA, is anticipated to begin during the summer of 2018. This significant roadway improvement will increase roadway capacity and safety to accommodate existing traffic conditions and proposed future projects such as this one. There has been coordination between the Capella developer and Town staff to determine appropriate access locations along the newly designed La Cholla Boulevard corridor. E. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION The following public notice has been provided: •Notification of all property owners within 1,000 feet •Notification to additional interested parties who signed in at neighborhood meetings, including the neighborhood meetings held regarding the previous General Plan Amendment •Notification to all Homeowner's Associations •Advertisement in The Daily Territorial newspaper •Postings on the property •Postings at Town Hall and on the Town website Six neighborhood meetings were held (2 traditional, 4 focus group) regarding the proposed rezoning. Neighborhood meeting summaries are provided in Attachment 13. Again, it is important to remember the preceding General Plan Amendment process involved an extraordinary amount of public participation and input that resulted in several outcomes which serve as the groundwork for the applicant's proposal. The General Plan public input process included four neighborhood meetings (3 traditional, 1 open house) and numerous smaller focus group meetings. Staff has received 3 letters of opposition from neighbors regarding the proposed rezoning which have been included in Attachment 14. F. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION In summary, there are a number of key factors regarding the proposed rezoning. Those factors include: 1.The proposal represents a comprehensively planned design which includes a variety of complimentary land uses 2. The request is consistent with the Long Range Conceptual Master Plan approved as part of the preceding General Plan Amendment process 3.The request is generally consistent with the General Plan Special Area Policies, with the one potential traffic issue pending. 4.The most sensitive parts of the property (riparian areas or washes) are being substantially preserved 5.Impacts to neighbors have been minimized as part of the design Based on the aforementioned factors, staff will recommend approval of the proposed rezoning, pending final review and approval of the Traffic Impact Analysis and subject to the draft conditions listed in Attachment 1, at the second Planning and Zoning Commission public hearing. FISCAL IMPACT: None. SUGGESTED MOTION: The purpose of this first public hearing is to provide information on the proposed rezoning and to serve as an opportunity for the public and Planning and Zoning Commission to provide input on the proposal and discuss any issues or concerns. As such, no action will be taken by the Commission during this meeting. A second public hearing is tentatively scheduled for April 3, 2018 where the Commission will again take public input, deliberate and provide a recommendation to Town Council. Attachments Page 5 of 6Print Staff Report 3/1/2018http://agenda.orovalleyaz.gov:8085/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=2499&rev_num=0&mode=Ex... ATTACHMENT 1 - CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ATTACHMENT 2 - APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL ATTACHMENT 3 - LOCATION MAP ATTACHMENT 4 - LONG RANGE CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN ATTACHMENT 5 - SPECIAL AREA POLICIES ATTACHMENT 6 - TENTATIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONCEPTS ATTACHMENT 7 - GENERAL PLAN & ZONING MAPS ATTACHMENT 8 - GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE ANALYSIS ATTACHMENT 9 - ZONING CODE CONFORMANCE ANALYSIS ATTACHMENT 10 - REQUESTED ZONING CODE MODIFICATIONS ATTACHMENT 11 - ZONING CODE MODIFICATIONS ANALYSIS ATTACHMENT 12- TENTATIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONCEPTS ANALYSIS ATTACHMENT 13 - NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING SUMMARIES ATTACHMENT 14 - NEIGHBOR COMMENT LETTERS Page 6 of 6Print Staff Report 3/1/2018http://agenda.orovalleyaz.gov:8085/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=2499&rev_num=0&mode=Ex... Planning & Zoning Commission AGENDA ITEM: 2. Meeting Date:04/03/2018 Submitted By:Michael Spaeth, Community Development & Public Works Case Number: OV1601793 SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING A PROPOSED REZONING FROM R1-144 TO PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT FOR APPROXIMATELY 199-ACRES LOCATED WEST OF LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD BETWEEN LAMBERT LANE AND NARANJA DRIVE AND 8.2-ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD AND NARANJA DRIVE, OV1601793 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the applicant's request, subject to the conditions listed in Attachment 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The purpose of this request is to rezone (Attachment 2) from R1-144 (large lot residential) to Planned Area Development (PAD) on approximately 199-acres located west of La Cholla Boulevard between Lambert Lane and Naranja Drive and 8.2-acres located on the northwest corner of La Cholla Boulevard and Naranja Drive. This is a comprehensively planned project on a total of 207-acres (Attachment 3), which includes medium and high density residential (no apartments), commercial, recreation and quasi-public (Church expansion) uses. The proposed rezoning is consistent with both the General Plan Long Range Conceptual Master Plan and the Special Area Policies. A General Plan Amendment was approved for the site in 2015 which serves as the foundation for the applicants proposal. The extent of outreach and public participation was extraordinary and resulted in the development of a Long Range Conceptual Master Plan (Attachment 4) and numerous Special Area Policies (Attachment 5). Both include more design detail than any other General Plan amendment to date. As a result, design oriented policies/mapping (location of recreation areas, access, building heights etc.) were adopted that guide the rezoning Tentative Development Plan. The applicant's proposal is unique in that it includes multiple "Tentative Development Plan Concepts" (Attachment 6) which afford the property owner additional flexibility in the future. All individual concepts are in conformance with Zoning Code requirements. The Planning and Zoning Commission held the first of two required public hearings on March 6, 2018. No action was taken during that hearing. Several residents spoke at the meeting and the following issues were discussed: Traffic - Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) completion Impacts to La Cholla Boulevard, Lambert Lane and Naranja Drivea. Access on Cañada Hills Driveb. 1. Compatibility with surrounding area2. The complexity of multiple Tentative Development Plan concepts3. Recreational area requirements4. Extent of open space5. This report further addresses these issues. For background information and additional analysis, the original staff report is provided as Attachment 7. The draft meeting minutes are included as Attachment 8. The April 3, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting is the second required public hearing. During the meeting the Commission will consider public testimony and vote to make a recommendation to Town Council. BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: The background information and analysis for the proposed rezoning can be found in the March 6, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission staff report (Attachment 7) A. DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS At the March 6, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, the following issues and/or concerns were discussed (comments in italics ): 1. Traffic The roads most impacted by this development are Naranja Drive, Lambert Lane and La Cholla Boulevard as well as the Cañada Hills Drive intersection. Since the last Commission hearing on this matter, a detailed Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was evaluated and approved by Town engineering staff. A summary of the TIA is included below: Naranja Drive, Lambert Lane and La Cholla Boulevarda. Naranja Drive The developer will be required to install turn lanes into Parcel A (northwest corner of La Cholla Blvd. and Naranja Dr.) and Parcel B (southwest corner of La Cholla Blvd. and Naranja Dr.) to help minimize impacts to thru traffic. During the March 6, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting larger concerns were expressed about Naranja Drive being congested in the morning and afternoon peak hours during the start and end of a typical Ironwood Ridge school day. The primary cause of this congestion is the strong prevalence of westbound traffic for entry into the parking and drop-off/pick-up areas within the school campus. The congestion issue is compounded by the fact the school is located on the south side of Naranja Drive which forces most motorists to make left-turns into the campus. This results in a long back-up of vehicles, particularly during the morning peak periods. To mitigate the issue, the Town widened Naranja Drive in 2015 to create a painted center median which doubles as a continuous left-turn lane for westbound vehicles entering the school. The purpose of the center lane is to free up the westbound through lane by providing a separate storage area for motorists waiting to enter the school from the east. These improvements met the intended purpose as the westbound through lane is relatively free flowing during the morning and afternoon peak periods. The other main issue resulting from the heavy morning and afternoon traffic is the difficulty for motorists to turn left out of new or existing subdivisions along this segment of Naranja Drive. There is no easy solution to alleviate this issue which is the result of westbound left-turning traffic -- essentially forming a solid barrier between west and eastbound lanes. There are two important points to be noted: The proposed development areas adjacent to Naranja Drive (Parcels A and B) will also have direct access points to La Cholla Boulevard. The La Cholla access points provides a means for motorists to head south towards Tucson, north towards Tangerine Road or east towards Oracle Road. Other developments along Naranja Drive also have secondary access drive connections such as The Estates at Cappella to La Cholla Boulevard and Saguaros Viejos to Glover Road or La Cholla Boulevard; 1. During all other times beyond the heavy morning and afternoon peak periods, Naranja Drive has relatively low traffic volume and therefore provides a good level of service for motorists. 2. Lambert Lane The developer will be responsible for the widening of Lambert Lane to accommodate two through lanes in the eastbound and westbound directions, from La Cholla Boulevard to the western project limits. Timing of the improvements shall coincide with the construction of Parcels J, H and K as they develop. Furthermore, the developer will be required to coordinate with Pima County for improvements to the Lambert Lane/Shannon Road intersection to increase capacity and safety. La Cholla Boulevard Construction for the widening of La Cholla Boulevard to four lanes, as funded by the RTA, is anticipated to begin during the latter half of 2018. The roadway design already includes accommodations for multiple access points along the Capella development. Completion of the La Cholla widening improvement project is expected to take approximately 2-years which coincides well with the potential timing of this development. It should be noted that TIA updates will be required at the final site planning stage for each development area as they occur. Each will identify any additional off-site improvements that may be proactively warranted at time of development. All public roadway improvements to be completed by the developer shall be at their expense and will require approval and a permit issued from the Town Engineer’s office. Access on Cañada Hills Drive b. The proposed rezoning conforms to the General Plan policy regarding access to Cañada Hills Drive. The Traffic Impact Analysis indicates that a future traffic signal is warranted at this intersection on La Cholla Blvd. Timing of the signal installation and associated intersection improvements shall coincide with construction of any PAD development area or construction of the proposed roadway creating the new west leg of the intersection, whichever occurs first. To meet the Special Area Policy and improve the safety and efficiency of the intersection, the final design will not permit eastbound or westbound through traffic across La Cholla Boulevard. 2. Compatibility with surrounding land uses The proposed rezoning meets the anticipated land uses and detailed planning polices in the previously approved General Plan amendment. It is important to note the underlying zoning designations are consistent with the Long Range Conceptual Master Plan (Attachment 4) established as part of the previous General Plan Amendment process. See the March 6, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission staff report (Attachment 7) regarding General Plan conformance and compatibility with the surrounding area. 3. Tentative Development Plan concepts or scenarios The proposed Planned Area Development includes a unique approach to the rezoning Tentative Development Plan (TDP) requirement, though similar to the Oro Valley Town Center Planned Area Development (San Dorado development), which affords the applicant more flexibility in the future. The rezoning includes multiple "Tentative Development Plan Concepts" (Attachment 6) as indicated in the table below: PARCEL PROPOSED LAND USES(S)# OF DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS Parcel A Neighborhood Commercial/Office (C-N) or Medium Density Residential 4 (3 commercial/office & 1 residential) Parcel B Community Commercial (C-1) or Medium Density Residential 5 (4 commercial & 1 residential) Parcel C Recreation 1 Parcel D High Density Residential or Medium Density Residential 4 (3 attached residential & 1 detached residential) Parcel E High Density Residential, Medium Density Residential or Church Expansion 5 (3 attached residential & 1 detached residential & 1 church expansion) Parcel F Recreation 1 Proposed use(s) by Parcel 4. Recreational Area requirements for new Planned Area Developments (PAD's) The Zoning Code requires all new PAD's to address the following regarding recreation areas: Pedestrian, equestrian and bicycle trails are designated, including picnic/rest areas Recreation and open space facilities are linked to the community open space network where appropriate Neighborhood scale recreation and appropriate linkages to existing and planned trail systems are provided Each active recreational area is suitably located and accessible to the area it is intended to serve and adequate screening is provided to ensure privacy and quiet for neighboring uses. Furthermore, the Zoning Code requires the following relative to recreational area location and design: Serve as a focal point for passive and active recreational activities Provide a meaningful place for neighborhood gatherings and activities Be located in highly visible areas that are accessible to all residents within the project The proposed rezoning is consistent with the above criteria with 3 recreation areas spread throughout the PAD. The recreation areas provide convenient access to all residential parcels, as well as connectivity to trails and multi-use paths. Lastly, each of the recreation areas will be required to incorporate landscaping to help provide additional screening for adjacent residential uses. 5. Open space The applicant's proposal includes approximately 73.8-acres of open space, or approximately 36% of the total project area. The open space within the Planned Area Development (PAD) is comprised of: Critical Resource Area (riparian/wash areas) - requires 95% preservation1. Resource Management Area Tier II - requires 25% preservation2. Recreation Areas - requires 1 acre of recreation area for every 85 dwelling units within the project3. Furthermore, future developers will be required to identify and preserve all significant vegetation as defined by the Zoning Code, including saguaro's. Saguaro's that do not meet the significant vegetation criteria, but are healthy will be required to be transplanted on-site as part of the corresponding landscape plan. B. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Staff has received several additional letters (Attachment 9) regarding the applicant's proposed rezoning. C. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION In summary, there are a number of key factors regarding the proposed rezoning. Those factors include: The proposal represents a comprehensively planned design which includes a variety of complimentary land uses1. The request is consistent with the Long Range Conceptual Master Plan approved as part of the preceding General Plan Amendment process 2. The request is consistent with the General Plan Special Area Policies3. The most sensitive parts of the property (riparian areas or washes) are being substantially preserved4. Impacts to neighbors have been addressed as provided in the previously approved General Plan amendment.5. Based on the aforementioned factors, staff recommends approval of the proposed rezoning, subject to the conditions listed in Attachment 1. Parcel G Recreation 1 Parcel H Medium Density Single-family Residential 1 Parcel J Community Commercial (C-1)3 Parcel K Low Density Residential 1 Parcel L Low Density Residential or Church Expansion 2 (1 residential & 1 church expansion) Parcel M Low Density Residential 1 FISCAL IMPACT: None. SUGGESTED MOTION: The Planning and Zoning Commission may wish to consider the following suggested motion for the proposed rezoning: The Planning and Zoning Commission may wish to consider the following suggested motion for the proposed rezoning: I MOVE to recommend approval of the Capella rezoning, subject to the conditions listed in Attachment 1, based on a finding that the proposal is consistent with the General Plan and applicable Zoning Code requirements. OR I MOVE to recommend denial of the Capella rezoning, based on a finding that ___________________________________. Attachments ATTACHMENT 1 - CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ATTACHMENT 2 - APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL ATTACHMENT 3 - LOCATION MAP ATTACHMENT 4 - LONG RANGE CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN ATTACHMENT 5 - SPECIAL AREA POLICIES ATTACHMENT 6 - TENTATIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONCEPTS ATTACHMENT 7 - 3.6.2018 PZC STAFF REPORT ATTACHMENT 8 - DRAFT 3.6.2018 PZC MINUTES ATTACHMENT 9 - ADDITIONAL NEIGHBOR COMMENTS Town Council Regular Session 2. Meeting Date:05/16/2018 Requested by: Bayer Vella Submitted By:Patty Hayes, Community and Economic Development Department:Community Development & Public Works Information SUBJECT: AMENDING SECTION 28 OF THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REGARDING THE ALLOWED USES AND SIZES OF ELECTRONIC MESSAGE BOARDS ON MONUMENT SIGNS a. RESOLUTION NO. (R)18-17, DECLARING THE PROPOSED ZONING CODE AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 28 RELATED TO ELECTRONIC MESSAGE BOARDS, PROVIDED IN EXHIBIT "A" WITHIN THE ATTACHED RESOLUTION AND FILED WITH THE CLERK, A PUBLIC RECORD b. PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE NO. (O)18-08, AMENDING CHAPTER 28 OF THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE ALLOWING ELECTRONIC MESSAGE BOARDS ON MONUMENT SIGNS FOR PRIVATE SCHOOLS AND RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval at their April 3, 2018 meeting. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A. This first item is an administrative requirement declaring the proposed code amendment a public record (Attachment 1). B. The purpose of this code amendment is to include private schools and religious institutions in the list of sign users who can display a message on a monument sign with an electronic message board (Attachment 2). Private schools and religious institutions are presently only allowed to change the message on a monument sign by manually inserting or removing letters. Currently only theaters, time/temperature and gas price signs may use an electronic message board. The amendment defines the size allowed for the electronic message board, which is proposed to be 35% of the sign area for private schools and churches. The proposed amendment does not increase the overall size, quantity or types of signs already allowed in the code. Electronic message boards are generally a rectangular shaped screen installed on a sign structure that allows changing messages to be shown to the public. The zoning code provides standards for those types of signs that will continue to apply: No constant moving, blinking or flashing Messages can only change once every 24 hours, except for fuel prices Background color of the screen is limited to black Maximum of two (2) colors allowed for text Brightness limited to 200 nits Signs must be turned off by specific times This proposed amendment is a small portion of the sign code revisions recognized in the Planning Division 17-19 Work Plan. This specific amendment to the sign code is being brought forward at this time due to a request from a local church (Attachment 3). BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: The zoning code allows messages on monument signs to change either manually or electronically, for a specific group of users which includes gas stations, theaters, time/temperature, churches and private schools. However, electronically changing messages have been strictly limited to gas prices, time/temperature and theater listings only. Other sign users, such as private schools and churches, are limited to manually changing the message on a monument sign without electronic methods. An example of the two different types of changeable message signs are shown in Attachment 4. The proposed changes to the zoning code will allow all of these same sign users (theaters, gas stations, time/temp, schools and churches) to continue to change messages on their monument signs but will allow all of them to choose either manual or electronic methods. The area of the sign dedicated to the electronic message board is defined in the proposed code for both private schools and churches. Staff reviewed similar sign allowances in other Arizona jurisdictions along with existing signs near or in Oro Valley and found that many jurisdictions allow electronically changing signs on monument type signs with varied size allowances and some do not allow them at all (Attachment 5). Staff proposes that allowing an Electronic Message Boards to use up to 35% of the sign area on a monument sign provides an adequate area for messages to be displayed without overpowering the overall appearance and character of the sign (Attachment 6). Further discussion about the size of the electronic message board is continued in the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting summary. General Plan Conformance The Your Voice, Our Future General Plan provides the following goals, policies and actions: Goal Q: A built environment that creatively integrates landscape, architecture, open space and conservation elements to increase the sense of place, community interaction and quality of life. Policy Land Use 6: Maintain the small town, neighborly character and improve the design and safety of the built environment. Action item #125: Maintain the unique character of Oro Valley by studying and updating: Signage regulations to emphasize identification and direction over advertising goods or services to maintain compatibility and minimal intrusiveness. This new code amendment meets this goal by: 1. Limiting the size of the Electronic Message Boards on monument signs maintains the character of the Town. 2. The amendment does not increase signage in the Town, but provides an updated code to continue to allow identification of the property. Planning and Zoning Commission meeting summary: The zoning code amendment was heard by the Planning and Zoning Commission at a public hearing held on April 3, 2018. Minutes from the Commission meeting can be found in Attachment 7. Topics of discussion at the hearing included: The frequency a message changes The two color limit on text Clarification that public schools and government properties are exempt from sign standards Concern that limits on color and frequency of message changing wasn't equal treatment for all schools A representative from the church who asked for the zoning code amendment to be brought forward at this time, asked if the Commission would consider allowing more than two colors on the message board and also allow a larger portion of the sign to contain the electronic message board. The representative suggested allowing up to 60% of the sign as an electronic message board instead of the proposed 35%. The representative from the church has submitted a supplemental document asking to increase the 35% size of the message board as provided in Attachment 8. At the conclusion of the meeting, the Commission recommended approval of the code amendment as originally proposed. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A SUGGESTED MOTION: Two motions are on the agenda for the case. The first motion is an administrative action to declare the amendment a public record. The second motion is to approve or deny the proposed code amendment. Item A: I MOVE to (approve/deny) Resolution No. (R)18-17, declaring the proposed amendments to Chapter 28, related to electronic message boards, in the Oro Valley Zoning Code within the attached resolution and filed with the Town Clerk, a public record. Item B: I MOVE to (approve/deny) Ordinance No. (O)18-08, amending Chapter 28 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code, allowing electronic message boards for private schools and religious institutions. Attachments Attachment 1 Resolution (R)18-17 Declaring a Public Record Attachment 2 Ordinance (O)18-08 Attachment 3 Request for Code Change Attachment 4 Sign Type Comparison Attachment 5 Jurisdiction Research Attachment 6 Sign Size Comparison Attachment 7 PZC Staff report, minutes, attachments Attachment 8 Request to Increase Size RESOLUTION NO. (R)18-17 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, DECLARING AS A PUBLIC RECORD THAT CERTAIN DOCUMENT ENTITLED CHAPTER 28, SIGNS, SECTIONS 28.3, “GENERAL SIGN REQUIREMENTS”, 28.4 “DEFINITIONS AND SIGN TYPES”, 28.5 “PERMANENT SIGNS”, 28.9, “PROHIBITED SIGNS” AND CHAPTER 31, DEFINITIONS, ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT “A” AND FILED WITH THE TOWN CLERK BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, that certain document Chapter 28, Signs, Sections 28.3, “General Sign Requirements”, 28.4, “Definitions and Sign Types”, 28.5 “Permanent Signs”, 28.9 “Prohibited Signs” and Chapter 31, Definitions, three copies of which are on file in the Office of the Town Clerk, is hereby declared to be a public record, and said copies are ordered to remain on file with the Town Clerk. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, this 16 TH day ofMay, 2018. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Dr. Satish I. Hiremath, Mayor ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM : Michael Standish, Town Clerk Tobin Sidles, Legal Services Director Date: Date: EXHIBIT “A” Section 28.3 General Sign Requirements B. Illumination 1. Illuminationof signs, when permitted by this chapter, may be accomplished only by the following methods: a. Halo or internal illumination, to the extent that only the sign characters and logos emit light, unless otherwise approved by the Planning and Zoning Administrator or the Planning and Zoning Commission. b. Sign lighting may include neon, light emitting diodes (LED) and other light sources, except where expressly prohibited in this chapter, in accordance with the following standards: i. Light sources shall be spaced the maximum distance to obtain uniformity on the face material. ii. Color temperature shall not exceed four thousand four hundred (4,400) kelvins. c. Area lighting provided such lighting is in accordance with the Town of Oro Valley Lighting Code. d. Illuminated wall signs may be turned on no earlier than 5:00 a.m. and shall be turned off no later than 11:00 p.m. or when the business closes, whichever is later, or as specified in this chapter. e. Electronic message boards such as LED, LCD, plasma screens and similar electronic message signs expressly permitted in this chapter as changeable copy signsshall meet the following standards: i. Limited to two hundred (200) nits (candela per square meter), full white mode, from sunset to sunrise. New code language in ALL CAPS, strikethrough used for language to be removed ii. Constant movement, blinking, flashing, high intensity, or animation caused by an LED or other electronic components of the sign is prohibited. iii. Message shall not change more than once every twenty-four (24) hours or as State law requires the price of the product to change. iv. Background of changeable copyTHE ELECTRONIC MESSAGE BOARD portion of the sign shall be black and no more than two (2) colors shall BE allowed for words or numbers. f. Sign plans submitted for permitting shall be sufficiently complete to enable the Planning and Zoning Administrator to readily ascertain code compliance. The Planning and Zoning Administrator may require additional evidence of compliance such as cut sheets, manufacturer specifications and documentation from the sign and/or sign lighting manufacturer, proving compliance with the lighting standards, which will be kept on file at the Town as evidence of code compliance for follow up inspections and complaints. g. A label must be attached to theexterior of sign indicating compliance with maximum kelvin or nit rating. 28.3.B.2 Prohibited Sign Lighting The following types of light sources are prohibited as means to illuminate or attract attention to any sign: a. Exposed light source other than as expressly permitted in window signs Section 28.5.b.15 14 andOR as a component of aN changeable copy messageELECTRONIC MESSAGE BOARD permitted in Sections 28.5.b.10, 11 and 12. b. LED illuminated window sign display areas per Section 28.5.b.15.14.iv.d.3. c. Blinking, flashing, rotating, constant movement and animated light sources. d. Search lights. e. An illuminated sign placed on the interior of a business which is visible from the exterior shall not be illuminated when the business is closed, except “closed for business” signs. Section 28.4 Definitions and Sign Types Note for Code Publisher editing: Eliminating definition number 13 will require renumbering of all subsequent definitions. Also the following code references will require renumbering. 13. Changeable Copy Sign Refer to Section 28.5.B.2. 20. Directional Sign Refer to Section 28.5.B.3. 2 21. Directory Sign Refer to Section 28.5.B.4. 3 24. ElectronicMessage SignBOARD A sign that permits the movement or frequent changing of messages by means of electronically controlled sign copy. 25. Entryway Sign Refer to Sections 28.5.B.5 4 and 28.5.C.1. 42. Kiosk Sign Refer to Sections 28.5.B.6. 5 and C.2. 47. Menu Board Refer to Section 28.5.B.8. 6 61. Pedestrian Tenant Directory Refer to Section 28.5.B.9. 8 79. Service Station/Fuel Sign Refer to Section 28.5.B.10. 9 91. Theater Sign Refer to Section 28.5.B.11. 10 92. Time and Temperature Sign Refer to Section 28.5.B.12. 11 94. Under-Canopy Sign Refer to Section 28.5.B.13. 12 97. Wall Sign Refer to Section 28.5.B.14. 13 98. Window Sign Refer to Section 28.5.B.15. 14 Section 28.5 Permanent Signs B. Permanent Signs in a Commercial/Industrial Zoning District The following permanent sign types shall be allowed withina Commercial, Industrial and/or Private SchoolsZoning District AND FOR RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS AS SPECIFIED HEREIN. Section 28.5.B Permanent Signs Note for Code Publisher editing : Due to the removal of former sign type number 2, Changeable Copy Sign, thesubsequent sign types will need to be renumbered as follows: 1. Awning 2. Changeable Copy 2. Directional 3. Directory 4. Entryway 5. Kiosk 6. Menu 7. Monument 8. Pedestrian Tenant 9. Service Station 10. Theater 11. Time and Temperature 12. Under-Canopy 13. Wall 14. Window 28.5.B.2. Changeable Copy Sign a. Definition: A sign or portion thereof with characters, letters, or illustrations that can be changed or re-arranged without altering the face or surface of the sign. Changeable copy signs are limited to and/or restricted to, schools, and religious institutions. Standards for changeable copy signs for theaters are in subsection B.10of this section and for service station/fuel signs in subsection B.12of this section. Such signs shall be integrated into monument style or wall- mounted type signs and may be illuminated. Changeable copy may not be changed electronically, except as specified in this Chapter. b. Quantity: One (1) allowed as part of a monument style or wall sign. c. Area of Sign: To be included as a component ofa monument style or wall sign. Remove photo 28.5.B.Permanent Signs 7. 8. Monument Sign Note for Code Publisher editing: Items b thru h have been reformatted but no changes were made to the content expect as shown in strike thru and all caps. a. Definition: A permanent sign supported by structures, columns, uprights, and/or braces that are placed on, or anchored in, the ground independent of the building or business structure. A theater, service station/fuel, religious institution, or school sign may display their name and/or logo along with changeable copy panels. b. Quantity: i.One (1) per street frontage. ii.If frontage is greater than six hundred (600) feet and there is more than one (1) entrance to the development, a second sign is permitted. iii.For frontages greater than eight hundred (800) feet, additional signs may be approved by the Town. iv.A corner sign with frontage on both streets may be utilized as an additional allowable sign. c. Area of Sign: i.Fifty (50) square feet for a single tenant or the development name. and ii.Seventy-two (72) square feet for a multiple-tenant sign with tenant panels. d. Height: i.Not to exceed eight (8) feet from grade. ii.An architectural element of the sign, such as an arch or column, may exceed the height of the monument sign by twenty-five percent (25%); provided, that all text and logos are less than eight (8) feet in height from grade. e. Location: To be placed near the entrance or along a street frontage on private property. f. Setback: None unless otherwise required. g. Illumination: i.Illumination may be halo, internal, or a combination thereof. ii.Individual panels shall be opaque with copy that may be lit. iii.Unused tenant panels shall be opaque and designed to match the rest of the sign. iv.Thesign may be turned on at 5:00 a.m. and shall be turned off no later than 11:00 p.m. h.DESIGN: i.Blank tenant panels shall not be white. ii.The sign may be single-or double-faced, with all supporting structures concealed. iii.The sign may contain the name ofthe development and a maximum of eight (8) tenants, along with the property address. iv.No one (1) tenant may be displayed more than once in one (1) monument sign. I. CHANGEABLE COPY STANDARDS FOR MONUMENT SIGNS: I.USES ARE LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: A) PRIVATE SCHOOLS B) RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS C) SERVICE STATIONS, WHICH ARE SUBJECT TO SECTION 28.5.B.9 D) THEATERS, WHICH ARE SUBJECT TO SECTION 28.5.B.10 E) TIME/TEMPERATURE, WHICH ARE SUBJECT TO 28.5.B.11 II.QUANTITY: ONE (1) ALLOWED AS AN INTEGRATED PART OF A MONUMENT OR WALL SIGN III.SIZE: CHANGEABLE COPY PORTION OF THE SIGN SHALL NOT EXCEED 35% OF THE PROPOSED SIGN AREA. IV.ILLUMINATION: STANDARDS OF SECTION 28.3.B. SHALL APPLY. V.DESIGN: A) CHANGEABLE COPY MAY BE DONE MANUALLY OR WITH AN ELECTRONIC MESSAGE BOARD. B) ELECTRONIC MESSAGE BOARDS SHALL BE INTEGRATED INTO THE MONUMENT SIGN. 28.5.B. Permanent Signs 9. 10. Service Station/Fuel Sign a. Definition: A permanent, two (2) component, monument style sign displaying the changeable fuel prices, fuel types, nameof station, and/or logos. b. Quantity: One (1) per street frontage. c. Area of Sign: Thirty-two (32) square feet. d. Height: Not to exceed six (6) feet from grade. e. Location: On private property adjacent to an arterial or collector street only. f. Setback: None unless otherwise required. g. Illumination: Name and logo of the business may be internally illuminated. Current fuel prices and fuel types may be internally or electronically illuminated and shall meet the standards of Section 28.3.B. H. CHANGEABLE COPY STANDARDS FOR SERVICESTATION/FUEL SIGNS: I.USES ARE LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: A) FUEL PRICES B) FUEL TYPES II.SIZE: CHANGEABLE COPY PORTION OF THE SIGN SHALL NOT EXCEED 35% OF THE PROPOSED SIGN AREA. III.ILLUMINATION: STANDARDS OF SECTION 28.3.B. SHALL APPLY. IV.DESIGN: A) CHANGEABLE COPY MAY BE DONE MANUALLY OR WITH AN ELECTRONIC MESSAGE BOARD. B) ELECTRONIC MESSAGE BOARDS SHALL BE INTEGRATED INTO THE MONUMENT SIGN. Remove old photo Insert new photo Wall Sign a. Definition: Any sign which is fastened, attached, connected, or supported in whole or in part by a building or structure other than a sign structure whichis supported wholly by the ground with the exposed face of the sign in a plane parallel to the plane of the wall. i. A wall sign shall consist of individual character letters (pan channel or reverse pan channel). ii. Only individual logos may utilize cabinet sign type with a translucent sign face. iii. Wall signs may include the name of the business, a trademarked logo, tagline, and modifiers, if needed, to further clarify the goods or services available on the premises. b. Quantity: i. No more than two (2) elevations may contain a wall sign. ii. If a single tenant occupies an end unit or entire freestanding building, there may be signs on three (3) elevations, but only two (2) elevations may have illuminated wall signs. iii. “End unit”refers to the end unit of a building in the final phase of a development. c. Area of Sign: For building elevations containing wall signs, a sign may be: i. Twenty-four (24) square feet, with no single wall sign containing more than one (1) square foot of sign for each linear foot of building frontage, for a maximum sign area of one hundred fifty (150) square feet. ii. Wall signs for building elevations further than three hundred (300) feet from the street may contain no more than one and one-half (1 1/2) square feet of sign area for each linear foot of frontage, for a maximum sign area of two hundred (200) square feet. iii. Where businesses do not possess individual frontages, each may maintain an individual sign; however, the maximum wall sign square footage shall not be exceeded. Fuel iv. Taglines are not to exceed thirty-five percent (35%) of the actual area of the main wall sign, as permitted in this section. v. May not project more than eight (8) inches from the wall on which the sign is mounted. d. Height: No wall sign shall extend above the roofline of a building. e. Location: Shall only be placed on the building elevations or at the main entrance of a business which the sign identifies. f. Illumination: i. Individual letters may be non-illuminated, halo illuminated or internally illuminated. ii. Cabinet-type signs shall only emit light through the logo. iii. Taglines may be halo or internally illuminated and shall only emit light through a translucent material over cut out letters or characters. iv. The standards of Section 28.3.B shall apply. G. CHANGEABLE COPY STANDARDS FOR WALL SIGNS: I.USES ARE LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: A) PRIVATE SCHOOLS B) RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS C) THEATERS SEE SECTION28.5.B.10 D) TIME/TEMPERATURE SEE SECTION 28.5.B.11 II.QUANTITY: ONE (1) ALLOWED AS AN INTEGRATED PART OF A WALL SIGN IF CHANGALBE COPY IS NOT USED ON A MONUMENT SIGN. III.SIZE: CHANGEABLE COPY PORTION OF THE SIGN, INCLUDING FRAME, SHALL NOT EXCEED 35% OF THE PROPOSED SIGN AREA. IV.ILLUMINATION: INTERNAL V.DESIGN: A) CHANGEABLE COPY MAY NOT BE CHANGED ELECTRONICALLY. 28.5.C. Permanent Signs within a Residential Zoning District The following permanent signs shall be allowed within a Residential District: 1. Entryway Signs Refer to subsection B.5 4 of this section. 2. Kiosk Signs Refer to subsection B.6 5 of this section. 3. Changeable copy,Monument and wall signs for churches, RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS, PRIVATE schools and public institutions are permitted in residential districts subject to Town approval. 28.9.Prohibited Signs A. Permanent and Temporary Signs The following permanent and temporary signs shall not be allowed on any property or public right-of-way and areprohibited unless otherwise specified within this chapter. 1. Billboards; 2. Electronic message centers, EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY SECTIONS 28.5.B.7, 9, 10 AND 11; 3. Exposed neon signs, except as provided by Section 28.5.B.15 14; 4. Flashing lights; 5. Garage sale signs, except as provided by Section 28.7.A.6; 6. Inflatable signs, except as provided by Section 28.6.B.7; 7. Marquee signs; 8. Moving/animated signs; except barber-type animated signs are allowed for barbershops during business hours only; 9. Obscene signs; 10. Off-site advertising on public property; 11. Off-site signs; 12. Pennant signs; 13. Portable signs (sandwich board, etc.), except as provided in Section 28.6.B.8; 14. Projecting signs; 15. Roof signs; 16. Search lights; 17. Signs attached to any physical public property; 18. Signs in the median; 19. Vehicle signs. Chapter 31,add the following definition: INTEGRATED: AN ELEMENT OF A PROJECT THAT IS AN AESTHETIC OR FUNCTIONALPART OF A STRUCTURE OR DESIGN. THE INTEGRATED ELEMENT IS NOT INTENDED TO APPEAR AS AN ADDED OR ATTACHED FEATURE OF THE OVERALLPROJECT. ORDINANCE NO. (O)18-08 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, AMENDING CHAPTER 28, SIGNS, SECTIONS 28.3, “GENERAL SIGN REQUIREMENTS”, 28.4 “DEFINITIONS AND SIGN TYPES”, 28.5 “PERMANENT SIGNS”, 28.9, “PROHIBITED SIGNS” AND CHAPTER 31, DEFINITIONS OF THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED; REPEALING ALL RESOLUTIONS, ORDINANCES AND RULES OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY IN CONFLICT THEREWITH; PRESERVING THE RIGHTS AND DUTIES THAT HAVE ALREADY MATURED AND PROCEEDINGS THAT HAVE ALREADY BEGUN THEREUNDER WHEREAS, on March 13, 1981, the Mayor and Council approved Ordinance (O)81-58, which adopted that certain document entitled “Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised (OVZCR); and WHEREAS, on March 2, 2011, the Mayor and Council approved Ordinance (O) 11-07, which adopted Chapter 28, Signs, of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to revise Chapter 28, Signs, Sections 28.3, General Sign Requirements, 28.4, Definitions and Sign Types, 28.5 Permanent Signs, 28.9 Prohibited Signs and Chapter 31, Definitions, to include religious institutions and private schools in a list of allowed sign users who can display a message on a monument sign with an electronic message board; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a meeting on April 3, 2018, and voted to recommend approval of amending Chapter 28, Signs, Sections 28.3, General Sign Requirements, 28.4, Definitions and Sign Types, 28.5 Permanent Signs, 28.9 Prohibited Signs and Chapter 31, Definitions; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, that: SECTION 1.That certain document entitled Chapter 28, Signs, Sections 28.3, General Sign Requirements, 28.4, Definitions and Sign Types, 28.5 Permanent Signs, 28.9 Prohibited Signs and Chapter 31, Definitions, of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised, attached hereto as Exhibit “A” to allow electronic message boards for religious institutions and private schools. SECTION 2.All Oro Valley ordinances, resolutions or motions and parts of ordinances, resolutions or motions of the Council in conflict with the provision of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, this 16th day ofMay, 2018. 2 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Dr. Satish I. Hiremath, Mayor ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM : Michael Standish, Town Clerk Tobin Sidles, Legal Services Director Date: Date: 3 EXHIBIT “A” Section 28.3 General Sign Requirements B. Illumination 1. Illumination of signs, when permitted by this chapter, may be accomplished only by the following methods: a. Halo or internal illumination, to the extent that only the sign characters and logos emit light, unless otherwise approved by the Planning and Zoning Administrator or the Planning and Zoning Commission. b. Sign lighting may include neon, light emitting diodes (LED) and other light sources, except where expressly prohibited in this chapter, in accordance with the following standards: i. Light sources shall be spaced the maximum distance to obtain uniformity on the face material. ii. Color temperature shall not exceed four thousand four hundred (4,400) kelvins. c. Area lighting provided such lighting is in accordance with the Town of Oro Valley Lighting Code. d. Illuminated wall signs may be turned on no earlier than 5:00 a.m. and shall be turned off no later than 11:00 p.m. or when the business closes, whichever is later, or as specified in this chapter. e. Electronic message boards such as LED, LCD, plasma screens and similar electronic message signs expressly permitted in this chapter as changeable copy signsshall meet the following standards: i. Limited to two hundred (200) nits (candela per square meter), full white mode, fromsunset to sunrise. ii. Constant movement, blinking, flashing, high intensity, or animation caused by an LED or other electronic components of the sign is prohibited. iii. Message shall not change more than once every twenty-four (24) hours or as State law requires the price of the product to change. iv. Background of changeable copyTHE ELECTRONIC MESSAGE BOARD portion of the sign shall be black and no more than two (2) colors shall BE allowed for words or numbers. New code language in ALL CAPS, strikethrough used for language to be removed 4 f. Sign plans submitted for permitting shall be sufficiently complete to enable the Planning and Zoning Administrator to readily ascertain code compliance. The Planning and Zoning Administrator may require additional evidence of compliance such as cut sheets, manufacturer specifications and documentation from the sign and/or sign lighting manufacturer, proving compliance with the lighting standards, which will be kept on file at the Town as evidence of code compliance for follow up inspections and complaints. g. A label must be attached to the exterior of sign indicating compliance with maximum kelvin or nit rating. 28.3.B.2 Prohibited Sign Lighting The following types of light sources are prohibited as means to illuminate or attract attention to any sign: a. Exposed light source other than as expressly permitted in window signs Section 28.5.b.15 14 and OR as a component of aN changeable copy messageELECTRONIC MESSAGE BOARD permitted in Sections 28.5.b.10, 11 and 12. b. LED illuminated window sign display areas per Section 28.5.b.15.14.iv.d.3. c. Blinking, flashing, rotating, constant movement and animated light sources. d. Search lights. e. An illuminated sign placed on the interior of a business which is visible from the exterior shall not be illuminated when the business is closed, except “closed for business” signs. 5 Section 28.4 Definitions and Sign Types Note for Code Publisher editing: Eliminating definition number 13 will require renumbering of all subsequent definitions. Also the following code references will require renumbering. 13. Changeable Copy Sign Refer to Section 28.5.B.2. 20. Directional Sign Refer to Section 28.5.B.3. 2 21. Directory Sign Refer to Section 28.5.B.4. 3 24. Electronic Message SignBOARD A sign that permits the movement or frequent changing of messages by means of electronically controlled sign copy. 25. Entryway Sign Refer to Sections 28.5.B.5 4 and 28.5.C.1. 42. Kiosk Sign Refer to Sections 28.5.B.6. 5 and C.2. 47. Menu Board Refer to Section 28.5.B.8. 6 61. Pedestrian Tenant Directory Refer to Section 28.5.B.9. 8 79. Service Station/Fuel Sign Refer to Section 28.5.B.10. 9 91. Theater Sign Refer to Section 28.5.B.11. 10 92. Time and Temperature Sign Refer to Section 28.5.B.12. 11 94. Under-Canopy Sign Refer to Section 28.5.B.13. 12 6 97. Wall Sign Refer to Section 28.5.B.14. 13 98. Window Sign Refer to Section 28.5.B.15. 14 Section 28.5 Permanent Signs B. Permanent Signs in a Commercial/Industrial Zoning District The following permanent sign types shallbe allowed within a Commercial, Industrial and/or Private SchoolsZoning District AND FOR RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS AS SPECIFIED HEREIN. Section 28.5.B Permanent Signs Note for Code Publisher editing : Due to the removal of former sign type number 2, Changeable Copy Sign, the subsequent sign types will need to be renumbered as follows: 1. Awning 2. Changeable Copy 2. Directional 3. Directory 4. Entryway 5. Kiosk 6. Menu 7. Monument 8. Pedestrian Tenant 9. Service Station 10. Theater 11. Time and Temperature 12. Under-Canopy 13. Wall 14. Window 7 28.5.B.2. Changeable Copy Sign a. Definition: A sign or portion thereof with characters, letters, or illustrations that can be changed or re-arranged without altering the face or surface of the sign. Changeable copy signs are limited to and/or restricted to, schools, and religious institutions. Standards for changeable copy signs for theaters are in subsection B.10of this section and for service station/fuel signs in subsection B.12of this section. Such signs shall be integrated into monument style or wall-mounted type signs and may be illuminated. Changeable copy may not be changed electronically, except as specified in this Chapter. b. Quantity: One (1) allowed as part of a monument style or wall sign. c. Area of Sign: To be included as a component of a monument style or wall sign. Remove photo 8 28.5.B.Permanent Signs 7. 8. Monument Sign Note for Code Publisher editing: Items b thru h have been reformatted but no changes were made to the content expect as shown in strike thru and all caps. a. Definition: A permanent sign supported by structures, columns, uprights, and/or braces that are placed on, or anchored in, the ground independent of the building or business structure. A theater, service station/fuel, religious institution, or school sign may display their name and/or logo along with changeable copy panels. b. Quantity: i.One (1) per street frontage. ii.If frontage is greater than six hundred (600) feet and there is more than one (1) entrance to the development, a second sign is permitted. iii.For frontages greater than eight hundred (800) feet, additional signs may be approved by the Town. iv.A corner sign with frontage on both streets may be utilized as an additional allowable sign. c. Area of Sign: i.Fifty (50) square feet for a single tenant or the development name. and ii.Seventy-two (72) square feet for a multiple-tenant sign with tenant panels. d. Height: i.Not to exceed eight (8) feet from grade. ii.An architectural element of the sign, such as an arch or column, may exceed the height of the monument sign by twenty-five percent (25%); provided, that all text and logos are less than eight (8) feet in height from grade. e. Location: To be placed near the entrance or along a street frontage on private property. f. Setback: None unless otherwise required. g. Illumination: i.Illumination may be halo, internal, or a combination thereof. ii.Individual panels shall be opaque with copy that may be lit. iii.Unused tenant panels shall be opaque and designed to match the rest of the sign. iv.The sign may be turned on at 5:00 a.m. and shall be turned off no later than 11:00 p.m. h.DESIGN: i.Blank tenant panels shall not be white. ii.The sign may be single-or double-faced, with all supporting structures concealed. iii.The sign may contain the name of the development and a maximum of eight (8) tenants, along with the property address. iv.No one (1) tenant may be displayed more than once in one (1) monument sign. 9 I. CHANGEABLE COPY STANDARDS FOR MONUMENT SIGNS: I.USES ARE LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: A) PRIVATE SCHOOLS B) RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS C) SERVICE STATIONS, WHICH ARE SUBJECT TOSECTION 28.5.B.9 D) THEATERS, WHICH ARE SUBJECT TO SECTION 28.5.B.10 E) TIME/TEMPERATURE, WHICH ARE SUBJECT TO 28.5.B.11 II.QUANTITY: ONE (1) ALLOWED AS AN INTEGRATED PART OF A MONUMENT OR WALL SIGN III.SIZE: CHANGEABLE COPY PORTION OF THE SIGN SHALL NOT EXCEED 35% OF THE PROPOSED SIGN AREA. IV.ILLUMINATION: STANDARDS OF SECTION 28.3.B. SHALL APPLY. V.DESIGN: A) CHANGEABLE COPY MAY BE DONE MANUALLY OR WITH AN ELECTRONIC MESSAGE BOARD. B) ELECTRONIC MESSAGE BOARDS SHALL BE INTEGRATED INTO THE MONUMENT SIGN. 10 28.5.B. Permanent Signs 9. 10. Service Station/Fuel Sign a. Definition: A permanent, two (2) component, monument style sign displaying the changeable fuel prices, fuel types, name of station, and/or logos. b. Quantity: One (1) per street frontage. c. Area of Sign: Thirty-two (32) square feet. d. Height: Not to exceed six (6) feet from grade. e. Location: On private property adjacent to an arterial or collector street only. f. Setback: None unless otherwise required. g. Illumination: Name and logo of the business may be internally illuminated. Current fuel prices and fuel types may be internally or electronically illuminated and shall meetthe standards of Section 28.3.B. H. CHANGEABLE COPY STANDARDS FOR SERVICESTATION/FUEL SIGNS: I.USES ARE LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: A) FUEL PRICES B) FUEL TYPES II.SIZE: CHANGEABLE COPY PORTION OF THE SIGN SHALL NOT EXCEED 35% OF THE PROPOSED SIGN AREA. III.ILLUMINATION: STANDARDS OF SECTION 28.3.B. SHALL APPLY. IV.DESIGN: A) CHANGEABLE COPY MAY BE DONE MANUALLY OR WITH AN ELECTRONIC MESSAGE BOARD. B) ELECTRONIC MESSAGE BOARDS SHALL BE INTEGRATED INTO THE MONUMENT SIGN. Remove old photo Insert new photo Fuel 11 Wall Sign a. Definition: Any sign which is fastened, attached, connected, or supported in whole or in part by a building or structure other than a signstructure which is supported wholly by the ground with the exposed face of the sign in a plane parallel to the plane of the wall. i. A wall sign shall consist of individual character letters (pan channel or reverse pan channel). ii. Only individual logos may utilize cabinet sign type with a translucent sign face. iii. Wall signs may include the name of the business, a trademarked logo, tagline, and modifiers, if needed, to further clarify the goods or services available on the premises. b. Quantity: i. No more than two (2) elevations may contain a wall sign. ii. If a single tenant occupies an end unit or entire freestanding building, there may be signs on three (3) elevations, but only two (2) elevations may have illuminated wall signs. iii. “End unit” refers to the end unit of a building in the final phase of a development. c. Area of Sign: For building elevations containing wall signs, a sign may be: i. Twenty-four (24) square feet, with no single wall sign containing more than one (1) square foot of sign for each linear foot of building frontage, for a maximum sign area of one hundred fifty (150) square feet. ii. Wall signs for building elevations further than three hundred (300) feet from the street may contain no more than one and one-half (1 1/2) square feet of sign area for each linear foot of frontage, for a maximum sign area of two hundred (200) square feet. iii. Where businesses do not possess individual frontages, each may maintain an individual sign; however, the maximum wall sign square footage shall not be exceeded. iv. Taglines are not to exceed thirty-five percent (35%) of the actual area of the main wall sign, as permitted in this section. v. May not project more than eight (8) inches from the wall on which the sign is mounted. d. Height: No wall sign shall extend above the roofline of a building. e. Location: Shall only be placed on the building elevations or at the main entrance of a business which the sign identifies. f. Illumination: i. Individual letters may be non-illuminated, halo illuminated or internally illuminated. ii. Cabinet-type signs shall only emit light through the logo. iii. Taglines may be halo or internally illuminated and shall only emit light through a translucent material over cut out letters or characters. iv. The standards of Section 28.3.B shall apply. 12 G. CHANGEABLE COPY STANDARDS FOR WALL SIGNS: I.USES ARE LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: A) PRIVATE SCHOOLS B) RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS C) THEATERS SEE SECTION28.5.B.10 D) TIME/TEMPERATURE SEE SECTION 28.5.B.11 II.QUANTITY: ONE (1) ALLOWED AS AN INTEGRATED PART OF A WALL SIGN IF CHANGALBE COPY IS NOT USED ON A MONUMENT SIGN. III.SIZE: CHANGEABLE COPY PORTION OF THE SIGN, INCLUDING FRAME, SHALL NOT EXCEED 35% OF THE PROPOSED SIGNAREA. IV.ILLUMINATION: INTERNAL V.DESIGN: A) CHANGEABLE COPY MAY NOT BE CHANGED ELECTRONICALLY. 13 28.5.C. Permanent Signs within a Residential Zoning District The following permanent signs shall be allowed within a Residential District: 1. Entryway Signs Refer to subsection B.5 4 of this section. 2. Kiosk Signs Refer to subsection B.6 5 of this section. 3. Changeable copy,Monument and wall signs for churches, RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS, PRIVATE schools and public institutions are permitted in residential districts subject to Town approval. 14 28.9.Prohibited Signs A. Permanent and Temporary Signs The following permanent and temporary signs shall not be allowed on any property or public right-of- way and are prohibited unless otherwise specified within this chapter. 1. Billboards; 2. Electronic message centers, EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY SECTIONS 28.5.B.7, 9, 10 AND 11; 3. Exposed neon signs, except as provided by Section 28.5.B.15 14; 4. Flashing lights; 5. Garage sale signs, except as provided by Section 28.7.A.6; 6. Inflatable signs, except as provided by Section 28.6.B.7; 7. Marquee signs; 8. Moving/animated signs; except barber-type animated signs are allowed for barbershops during business hours only; 9. Obscene signs; 10. Off-site advertising on public property; 11. Off-site signs; 12. Pennant signs; 13. Portable signs (sandwich board, etc.), except as provided in Section 28.6.B.8; 14. Projecting signs; 15. Roof signs; 16. Search lights; 17. Signs attached to any physical public property; 18. Signs in the median; 19. Vehicle signs. Chapter 31,add the following definition: INTEGRATED: AN ELEMENT OF A PROJECT THAT IS AN AESTHETIC OR FUNCTIONALPART OF A STRUCTURE OR DESIGN. THE INTEGRATED ELEMENT IS NOTINTENDED TO APPEAR AS AN ADDED OR ATTACHED FEATURE OF THE OVERALL PROJECT. Sign Code AmendmentElectronic and Manual Message Boards(OV1800563)Attachment 440’ ROWHardy RoadLa Canada Drive Sign with manually changing messageSign with an electronicallychanging message Jurisdiction Allows an Electronic Message Board (EMB) Amount of sign the EMB may use City of Chandler Yes 50% City of Flagstaff No N/A City of Mesa Yes 50% City of Peoria Yes 66% City of Phoenix Yes 50% Paradise Valley No N/A City of Scottsdale No N/A Town of Gilbert Yes 50% Town of Sahuarita Yes 50% Town of Marana Yes 100%* City of Tucson Yes ** Pima County Yes *** All jurisdictions, that allow the signs, have limits on users. *Per a current draft code and based on certain circumstances ** Determined through a Master Sign Program process ***Determined though a Variance process Attachment 5 Sign Code AmendmentElectronic Message Board Size Comparison(OV1800563)Attachment 640’ ROWHardy RoadLa Canada Drive 50%30%35%Percentages shown indicates how much ofthe overall sign areathe Electronic Message Boarduses Planning & Zoning Commission AGENDA ITEM: 3. Meeting Date: 04/03/2018 Requested by: Bayer Vella, Community Development & Public Works Submitted By: Patty Hayes, Community and Economic Development Case Number: OV1800397 SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING A ZONING CODE TEXT AMENDMENT RELATED TO THE USE OF ELECTRONIC MESSAGE BOARDS ON MONUMENT SIGNS. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The proposed zoning code amendment is to expand the use of electronic message boards to include religious institutions and schools. Currently only theaters, time/temperature and gas price signs may utilize electronic message boards. Schools and religious institutions are currently only allowed to change the message on a monument sign by manually inserting or removing letters. The proposed amendment allows all of the current sign users an equal method of displaying their messages. The proposed amendment does not increase the size, quantity or type of signs already allowed in the code. Electronic message boards are generally a rectangular shaped screen installed on a sign structure that allows changing messages to be shown to the public. Sign standards currently in the code, such as limits on movement, brightness, and timing, will continue to apply to the proposed electronic message boards placed on monument signs . This proposed amendment (Attachment 1) is a small portion of the sign code revisions recognized in the Planning Division 17-19 Work Plan. This specific amendment to the sign code is being brought forward at this time due to a request from a local church (Attachment 2). BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: The zoning code allows signs to change messages on monument signs, either manually or electronically, for specific types of sign users which included gas stations, theaters, time/temperature, churches and schools. However, electronically changing messages have been limited to gas prices, time/temperature and theater listings only. Other sign users, such as schools and churches, are limited to manually changing the message on a monument sign without electronic methods. An example of the two different types of changeable message signs are shown in Attachment 3. Since Electronic Message Boards (EMB) were first introduced, technology has advanced to a point that those signs are more available to a wider array of users. Many of the previously mentioned sign users who display changing messages are choosing to change those messages by means of a computer located inside the business rather than by a person manually removing and inserting letters or numbers on the sign. The proposed changes to the zoning code will allow all of the same sign users (schools, gas stations, time/temp, churches and theaters ) to continue to change messages on their monument signs but will allow all of them to choose either manual or electronic methods. The size of the electronically changing portion of the sign is not clearly defined in the current code. In researching an appropriate size for an EMB, staff reviewed similar sign allowances in other Arizona jurisdictions along with existing signs near or in Oro Valley (Attachment 4). Staff found that many jurisdictions allow electronically changing signs on monument type signs with varied size allowances and some do not allow them at all. Staff determined that allowing Electronic Message Boards to use up to 35% of the sign area on a monument sign provides an adequate area for messages to be displayed without overpowering the overall appearance and character of the sign (Attachment 5). Page 1 of 2Print Staff Report 05/04/2018http://agenda.orovalleyaz.gov:8085/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=2531&rev_num=0&mode=... The existing code standards that will continue to apply to the expanded use of the electronic message boards on monument signs include: • No constant moving, blinking or flashing • Messages can only change once every 24 hours, except there is no limit for fuel price changes • Background color of the screen is limited to black • Brightness limited to 200 nits • Signs must be turned off by specific times General Plan Conformance The Your Voice, Our Future General Plan provides the following goals, policies and actions: Goal Q: A built environment that creatively integrates landscape, architecture, open space and conservation elements to increase the sense of place, community interaction and quality of life. Policy Land Use 6: Maintain the small town, neighborly character and improve the design and safety of the built environment. Action item #125: Maintain the unique character of Oro Valley by studying and updating: Signage regulations to emphasize identification and direction over advertising goods or services to maintain compatibility and minimal intrusiveness. This new code amendment meets this goal by: 1. Limiting the size of the Electronic Message Boards on monument signs maintains the character of the Town. 2. The amendment does not increase signage in the Town, but provides an updated code to continue to allow identification of the property. FISCAL IMPACT: None SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to recommend approval of the Zoning Code Amendment related to electronic message boards on monument signs as shown in Attachment 1. OR I MOVE to recommend denial of the Zoning Code Amendment related to electronic message boards on monument signs as shown in Attachment 1. Attachments Attachment 1 Draft Code Attachment 2 Applicant's Submittal Attachment 3 Sign Type Comparison Attachment 4 Research Attachment 5 Size of Electronic Message Boards Page 2 of 2Print Staff Report 05/04/2018http://agenda.orovalleyaz.gov:8085/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=2531&rev_num=0&mode=... April 3, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission 1 MINUTES ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR SESSION April 3, 2018 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CAÑADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER Chair Hurt called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Charlie Hurt, Chair Melanie Barrett, Vice Chair Thomas Gribb, Commissioner Bob Swope, Commissioner Don Cox, Commissioner Nathan Basken, Commissioner EXCUSED: Tom Drzazgowski, Commissioner TOWN STAFF PRESENT: Bayer Vella, Interim Community and Economic Development Director Paul Keesler, Public Works Director David Laws, Permitting Manager Joe Andrews, Chief Civil Deputy Attorney Bill Rodman, Councilmember PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Chair Hurt led the Commission and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. CALL TO AUDIENCE There were no speaker requests. COUNCIL LIAISON COMMENTS Council Liaison Bill Rodman provided the following updates: - On March 21, Council approved the Final Plat for Nakoma Sky, a Conditional Use Permit for Tucson Electric Power and amendments to the Zoning Code section April 3, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission 2 regarding the Economic Expansion Zone. - At the upcoming Council meeting on April 4, Council will re view the Saguaros Viejos Phase I and II projects. REGULAR SESSION AGENDA 1. REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE MARCH 6, 2018 REGULAR SESSION MEETING MINUTES MOTION: A motion was made by Commissioner Swope and seconded by Commissioner Cox to approve the meeting minutes. Discussion ensued amongst the Commission regarding comments that were not included in the minutes. MOTION carried, 6-0. 2. PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING A PROPOSED REZONING FROM R1-144 TO PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT FOR APPROXIMATELY 199-ACRES LOCATED WEST OF LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD BETWEEN LAMBERT LANE AND NARANJA DRIVE AND 8.2- ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD AND NARANJA DRIVE, OV1601793 Principal Planner Michael Spaeth gave an overview of Agenda Item 2 and outlined the following: - Purpose - Location - Proposal - March 6, 2018 Planning and Zoning hearing concerns - Traffic Impacts Public Works Director Paul Kessler detailed the key aspects of the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) including: - Roadway Capacities: existing and projected traffic volumes in 2030 - Traffic Impact Mitigation Measures - Special Area Policy regarding Cañada Hills Drive access - Updates/details on the La Cholla Boulevard, Lambert Lane and Naranja Drive road widening projects - New traffic signal at Cañada Hills Drive and La Cholla Boulevard Mr. Spaeth continued with his presentation: - Compatibility April 3, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission 3 - Rezoning Request: development scenarios - Open Space - Recreation Area requirements - Key Factors - Summary and Recommendation Paul Oland of The WLB Group, representing the applicant, provided a presentation that included the following: - History of property - Timeline of neighborhood outreach and hearings for the General Plan Amendment and Planned Area Development - Policy highlights from lengthy General Plan Amendment negotiations - Additional General Plan Policies - General Plan policies on each of the following parcels: A, B, D, E, H, J, K, L and M - Open Space, Recreation & Trails possible amenities - Possible Amenities on Parcels C, F, G -Proposed Recreation Area Comparison to Wildlife Ridge Park Discussion ensued amongst the Commission, staff and applicant. Chair Hurt opened the public hearing. The following individuals spoke in opposition of Agenda Item 2: - Oro Valley resident Vicki Stepp - Oro Valley resident Jose Echeverri - Oro Valley resident Alan Haggh - Oro Valley resident Paul Loomis - Oro Valley resident Rosalie Roszak - Oro Valley resident Jason Todd - Oro Valley resident Tim Bohen - Oro Valley resident Sarah Bertrand - Oro Valley resident Jan Cunningham The following individuals spoke on Agenda Item 2: - Oro Valley resident Mike Zinkin - Oro Valley resident Lynn Huebner - Oro Valley resident Bob Reiber - Oro Valley resident Chuck Cochran - Alyssa Page Leslie Sellgren was called to speak, but was not present. Chair Hurt closed the public hearing. April 3, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission 4 MOTION: A motion was made by Commissioner Cox and seconded by Commissioner Gribb to recommend approval of the Capella rezoning, subject to the conditions listed in Attachment 1, based on a finding that the proposal is consistent with the General Plan and applicable Zoning Code requirements. Further discussion ensued amongst the Commission, staff and applicant. AMENDED MOTION: A motion was made by Commissioner Cox and seconded by Commissioner Gribb to Amend the original motion to include the following conditions: 1. All future site plans for each parcel will go through the Conceptual Site Plan process to be considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission as well as Town Council for further review. 2. Complete an updated Traffic Impact Analysis for each development phase as required by Town Code. 3. Parcel M is restricted to 1-story height within 300 feet of the west property boundary. 4. The plans for restrooms and playgrounds in recreation areas must be maintained. MOTION carried, 6-0. Chair Hurt recessed the meeting at 9:35 p.m. Chair Hurt reconvened the meeting at 9:46 p.m. 3. PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING A ZONING CODE TEXT AMENDMENT RELATED TO THE USE OF ELECTRONIC MESSAGE BOARDS ON MONUMENT SIGNS. Senior Planning Technician Patty Hayes gave an overview of Agenda Item 3 and outlined the following: - Purpose - Proposal - Size Limits - Current Use - Code Standards - Background - Recommendation Discussion ensued amongst the Commission and staff. Chair Hurt opened the public hearing. The following individual spoke on Agenda Item 3: - Oro Valley resident John Sellers April 3, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission 5 Chair Hurt closed the public hearing. Further discussion ensued amongst the Commission and staff. MOTION: A motion was made by Commissioner Basken and seconded by Commissioner Cox to approve OV1800397 Zoning Code Text Amendment related to electronic message boards on monument signs as show in Attachment 1. MOTION carried, 6-0. PLANNING UPDATE (INFORMATIONAL ONLY) Interim Community and Economic Development Director Bayer Vella provided the following updates: - Neighborhood meeting on April 10 regarding the Oro Valley Town Center Planned Area Development amendment - Reviewed agenda items for next Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on May 1 ADJOURNMENT Chair Hurt adjourned the meeting at 10:17 p.m. Prepared by: Jeanna Ancona Senior Office Specialist I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the regular session Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of Oro Valley, Arizona held on the 3rd day of April, 2018. I further certify that the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present. Section 28.3 General Sign Requirements B. Illumination 1. Illumination of signs, when permitted by this chapter, may be accomplished only by the following methods: a. Halo or internal illumination, to the extent that only the sign characters and logos emit light, unless otherwise approved by the Planning and Zoning Administrator or the Planning and Zoning Commission. b. Sign lighting may include neon, light emitting diodes (LED) and other light sources, except where expressly prohibited in this chapter, in accordance with the following standards: i. Light sources shall be spaced the maximum distance to obtain uniformity on the face material. ii. Color temperature shall not exceed four thousand four hundred (4,400) kelvins. c. Area lighting provided such lighting is in accordance with the Town of Oro Valley Lighting Code. d. Illuminated wall signs may be turned on no earlier than 5:00 a.m. and shall be turned off no later than 11:00 p.m. or when the business closes, whichever is later, or as specified in this chapter. e. Electronic message boards such as LED, LCD, plasma screens and similar electronic message signs expressly permitted in this chapter as changeable copy signs shall meet the following standards: i. Limited to two hundred (200) nits (candela per square meter), full white mode, from sunset to sunrise. ii. Constant movement, blinking, flashing, high intensity, or animation caused by an LED or other electronic components of the sign is prohibited. iii. Message shall not change more than once every twenty-four (24) hours or as State law requires the price of the product to change. iv. Background of changeable copy THE ELECTRONIC MESSAGE BOARD portion of the sign shall be black and no more than two (2) colors shall BE allowed for words or numbers. f. Sign plans submitted for permitting shall be sufficiently complete to enable the Planning and Zoning Administrator to readily ascertain code compliance. The Planning and Zoning Administrator may require additional evidence of compliance such as cut sheets, manufacturer specifications and documentation from the sign and/or sign lighting manufacturer, proving compliance with the lighting standards, which will be kept on file at the Town as evidence of code compliance for follow up inspections and complaints. g. A label must be attached to the exterior of sign indicating compliance with maximum kelvin or nit rating. Attachment 1 New code language in ALL CAPS, strikethrough used for language to be removed 28.3.B.2 Prohibited Sign Lighting The following types of light sources are prohibited as means to illuminate or attract attention to any sign: a. Exposed light source other than as expressly permitted in window signs Section 28.5.b.15 14 and OR as a component of aN changeable copy message ELECTRONIC MESSAGE BOARD permitted in Sections 28.5.b.10, 11 and 12. b. LED illuminated window sign display areas per Section 28.5.b.15.14.iv.d.3. c. Blinking, flashing, rotating, constant movement and animated light sources. d. Search lights. e. An illuminated sign placed on the interior of a business which is visible from the exterior shall not be illuminated when the business is closed, except “closed for business” signs. Section 28.4 Definitions and Sign Types Note for Code Publisher editing: Eliminating definition number 13 will require renumbering of all subsequent definitions. Also the following code references will require renumbering. 13. Changeable Copy Sign Refer to Section 28.5.B.2. 20. Directional Sign Refer to Section 28.5.B.3. 2 21. Directory Sign Refer to Section 28.5.B.4. 3 24. Electronic Message Sign BOARD A sign that permits the movement or frequent changing of messages by means of electronically controlled sign copy. 25. Entryway Sign Refer to Sections 28.5.B.5 4 and 28.5.C.1. 42. Kiosk Sign Refer to Sections 28.5.B.6. 5 and C.2. 47. Menu Board Refer to Section 28.5.B.8. 6 61. Pedestrian Tenant Directory Refer to Section 28.5.B.9. 8 79. Service Station/Fuel Sign Refer to Section 28.5.B.10. 9 91. Theater Sign Refer to Section 28.5.B.11. 10 92. Time and Temperature Sign Refer to Section 28.5.B.12. 11 94. Under-Canopy Sign Refer to Section 28.5.B.13. 12 97. Wall Sign Refer to Section 28.5.B.14. 13 98. Window Sign Refer to Section 28.5.B.15. 14 Section 28.5 Permanent Signs B. Permanent Signs in a Commercial/Industrial Zoning District The following permanent sign types shall be allowed within a Commercial, Industrial and/or Private Schools Zoning District AND FOR RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS AS SPECIFIED HEREIN. Section 28.5.B Permanent Signs Note for Code Publisher editing: Due to the removal of former sign type number 2, Changeable Copy Sign, the subsequent sign types will need to be renumbered as follows: 1. Awning 2. Changeable Copy 2. Directional 3. Directory 4. Entryway 5. Kiosk 6. Menu 7. Monument 8. Pedestrian Tenant 9. Service Station 10. Theater 11. Time and Temperature 12. Under-Canopy 13. Wall 14. Window 28.5.B.2. Changeable Copy Sign a. Definition: A sign or portion thereof with characters, letters, or illustrations that can be changed or re- arranged without altering the face or surface of the sign. Changeable copy signs are limited to and/or restricted to, schools, and religious institutions. Standards for changeable copy signs for theaters are in subsection B.10 of this section and for service station/fuel signs in subsection B.12 of this section. Such signs shall be integrated into monument style or wall-mounted type signs and may be illuminated. Changeable copy may not be changed electronically, except as specified in this Chapter. b. Quantity: One (1) allowed as part of a monument style or wall sign. c. Area of Sign: To be included as a component of a monument style or wall sign. Remove photo 28.5.B.Permanent Signs 7. 8. Monument Sign Note for Code Publisher editing: Items b thru h have been reformatted but no changes were made to the content expect as shown in strike thru and all caps. a. Definition: A permanent sign supported by structures, columns, uprights, and/or braces that are placed on, or anchored in, the ground independent of the building or business structure. A theater, service station/fuel, religious institution, or school sign may display their name and/or logo along with changeable copy panels. b. Quantity: i. One (1) per street frontage. ii. If frontage is greater than six hundred (600) feet and there is more than one (1) entrance to the development, a second sign is permitted. iii. For frontages greater than eight hundred (800) feet, additional signs may be approved by the Town. iv. A corner sign with frontage on both streets may be utilized as an additional allowable sign. c. Area of Sign: i. Fifty (50) square feet for a single tenant or the development name. and ii. Seventy-two (72) square feet for a multiple-tenant sign with tenant panels. d. Height: i. Not to exceed eight (8) feet from grade. ii. An architectural element of the sign, such as an arch or column, may exceed the height of the monument sign by twenty-five percent (25%); provided, that all text and logos are less than eight (8) feet in height from grade. e. Location: To be placed near the entrance or along a street frontage on private property. f. Setback: None unless otherwise required. g. Illumination: i. Illumination may be halo, internal, or a combination thereof. ii. Individual panels shall be opaque with copy that may be lit. iii. Unused tenant panels shall be opaque and designed to match the rest of the sign. iv. The sign may be turned on at 5:00 a.m. and shall be turned off no later than 11:00 p.m. h. DESIGN: i. Blank tenant panels shall not be white. ii. The sign may be single- or double-faced, with all supporting structures concealed. iii. The sign may contain the name of the development and a maximum of eight (8) tenants, along with the property address. iv. No one (1) tenant may be displayed more than once in one (1) monument sign. I. CHANGEABLE COPY STANDARDS FOR MONUMENT SIGNS: I. USES ARE LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: A) PRIVATE SCHOOLS B) RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS C) SERVICE STATIONS SEE SECTION 28.5.B.9 D) THEATERS SEE SECTION 28.5.B.10 E) TIME/TEMPERATURE SEE SECTION 28.5.B.11 II. QUANTITY: ONE (1) ALLOWED AS AN INTEGRATED PART OF A MONUMENT OR WALL SIGN III. SIZE: CHANGEABLE COPY PORTION OF THE SIGN SHALL NOT EXCEED 35% OF THE PROPOSED SIGN AREA. IV. ILLUMINATION: STANDARDS OF SECTION 28.3.B. SHALL APPLY. V. DESIGN: A) CHANGEABLE COPY MAY BE DONE MANUALLY OR WITH AN ELECTRONIC MESSAGE BOARD. B) ELECTRONIC MESSAGE BOARDS SHALL BE INTEGRATED INTO THE MONUMENT SIGN. 28.5.B. Permanent Signs 9. 10. Service Station/Fuel Sign a. Definition: A permanent, two (2) component, monument style sign displaying the changeable fuel prices, fuel types, name of station, and/or logos. b. Quantity: One (1) per street frontage. c. Area of Sign: Thirty-two (32) square feet. d. Height: Not to exceed six (6) feet from grade. e. Location: On private property adjacent to an arterial or collector street only. f. Setback: None unless otherwise required. g. Illumination: Name and logo of the business may be internally illuminated. Current fuel prices and fuel types may be internally or electronically illuminated and shall meet the standards of Section 28.3.B. H. CHANGEABLE COPY STANDARDS FOR SERVICE STATION/FUEL SIGNS: I. USES ARE LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: A) FUEL PRICES B) FUEL TYPES II. SIZE: CHANGEABLE COPY PORTION OF THE SIGN SHALL NOT EXCEED 35% OF THE PROPOSED SIGN AREA. III. ILLUMINATION: STANDARDS OF SECTION 28.3.B. SHALL APPLY. IV. DESIGN: A) CHANGEABLE COPY MAY BE DONE MANUALLY OR WITH AN ELECTRONIC MESSAGE BOARD. B) ELECTRONIC MESSAGE BOARDS SHALL BE INTEGRATED INTO THE MONUMENT SIGN. Remove old photo Insert new photo Fuel Wall Sign a. Definition: Any sign which is fastened, attached, connected, or supported in whole or in part by a building or structure other than a sign structure which is supported wholly by the ground with the exposed face of the sign in a plane parallel to the plane of the wall. i. A wall sign shall consist of individual character letters (pan channel or reverse pan channel). ii. Only individual logos may utilize cabinet sign type with a translucent sign face. iii. Wall signs may include the name of the business, a trademarked logo, tagline, and modifiers, if needed, to further clarify the goods or services available on the premises. b. Quantity: i. No more than two (2) elevations may contain a wall sign. ii. If a single tenant occupies an end unit or entire freestanding building, there may be signs on three (3) elevations, but only two (2) elevations may have illuminated wall signs. iii. “End unit” refers to the end unit of a building in the final phase of a development. c. Area of Sign: For building elevations containing wall signs, a sign may be: i. Twenty-four (24) square feet, with no single wall sign containing more than one (1) square foot of sign for each linear foot of building frontage, for a maximum sign area of one hundred fifty (150) square feet. ii. Wall signs for building elevations further than three hundred (300) feet from the street may contain no more than one and one-half (1 1/2) square feet of sign area for each linear foot of frontage, for a maximum sign area of two hundred (200) square feet. iii. Where businesses do not possess individual frontages, each may maintain an individual sign; however, the maximum wall sign square footage shall not be exceeded. iv. Taglines are not to exceed thirty-five percent (35%) of the actual area of the main wall sign, as permitted in this section. v. May not project more than eight (8) inches from the wall on which the sign is mounted. d. Height: No wall sign shall extend above the roofline of a building. e. Location: Shall only be placed on the building elevations or at the main entrance of a business which the sign identifies. f. Illumination: i. Individual letters may be non-illuminated, halo illuminated or internally illuminated. ii. Cabinet-type signs shall only emit light through the logo. iii. Taglines may be halo or internally illuminated and shall only emit light through a translucent material over cut out letters or characters. iv. The standards of Section 28.3.B shall apply. G. CHANGEABLE COPY STANDARDS FOR WALL SIGNS: I. USES ARE LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: A) PRIVATE SCHOOLS B) RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS C) THEATERS SEE SECTION 28.5.B.10 D) TIME/TEMPERATURE SEE SECTION 28.5.B.11 II. QUANTITY: ONE (1) ALLOWED AS AN INTEGRATED PART OF A WALL SIGN IF CHANGALBE COPY IS NOT USED ON A MONUMENT SIGN. III. SIZE: CHANGEABLE COPY PORTION OF THE SIGN, INCLUDING FRAME, SHALL NOT EXCEED 35% OF THE PROPOSED SIGN AREA. IV. ILLUMINATION: INTERNAL V. DESIGN: A) CHANGEABLE COPY MAY NOT BE CHANGED ELECTRONICALLY. 28.5.C. Permanent Signs within a Residential Zoning District The following permanent signs shall be allowed within a Residential District: 1. Entryway Signs Refer to subsection B.5 4 of this section. 2. Kiosk Signs Refer to subsection B.6 5 of this section. 3. Changeable copy, Monument and wall signs for churches, RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS, PRIVATE schools and public institutions are permitted in residential districts subject to Town approval. 28.9.Prohibited Signs A. Permanent and Temporary Signs The following permanent and temporary signs shall not be allowed on any property or public right-of-way and are prohibited unless otherwise specified within this chapter. 1. Billboards; 2. Electronic message centers, EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY SECTIONS 28.5.B.7, 9, 10 AND 11; 3. Exposed neon signs, except as provided by Section 28.5.B.15 14; 4. Flashing lights; 5. Garage sale signs, except as provided by Section 28.7.A.6; 6. Inflatable signs, except as provided by Section 28.6.B.7; 7. Marquee signs; 8. Moving/animated signs; except barber-type animated signs are allowed for barbershops during business hours only; 9. Obscene signs; 10. Off-site advertising on public property; 11. Off-site signs; 12. Pennant signs; 13. Portable signs (sandwich board, etc.), except as provided in Section 28.6.B.8; 14. Projecting signs; 15. Roof signs; 16. Search lights; 17. Signs attached to any physical public property; 18. Signs in the median; 19. Vehicle signs. Chapter 31, add the following definition: INTEGRATED: AN ELEMENT OF A PROJECT THAT IS AN AESTHETIC OR FUNCTIONAL PART OF A STRUCTURE OR DESIGN. THE INTEGRATED ELEMENT IS NOT INTENDED TO APPEAR AS AN ADDED OR ATTACHED FEATURE OF THE OVERALL PROJECT. Sign Code AmendmentElectronic and Manual Message Boards(OV1800563)Attachment 340’ ROWHardy RoadLa Canada Drive Sign with manually changing messageSign with an electronicallychanging message Jurisdiction Allows an Electronic Message Board (EMB) Amount of sign the EMB may use City of Chandler Yes 50% City of Flagstaff No N/A City of Mesa Yes 50% City of Peoria Yes 66% City of Phoenix Yes 50% Paradise Valley No N/A City of Scottsdale No N/A Town of Gilbert Yes 50% Town of Sahuarita Yes 50% Town of Marana Yes 100%* City of Tucson Yes ** Pima County Yes *** All jurisdictions, that allow the signs, have limits on users. *Per a current draft code and based on certain circumstances ** Determined through a Master Sign Program process ***Determined though a Variance process Attachment 4 Sign Code AmendmentElectronic Message Board Size Comparison(OV1800563)Attachment 540’ ROWHardy RoadLa Canada Drive 50%30%35%Percentages shown indicates how much ofthe overall sign areathe Electronic Message Boarduses REQUEST: Vistoso Community Church (VCC) respectfully requests a revision to the zoning code text amendment related to the use of electronic message boards on monument signs that will allow the message board portion of the sign to be 50-60 percent of the total area instead of the 35 percent currently proposed. This amendment was submitted with the 35 percent restriction and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission on its April 3, 2018 meeting. BACKGROUND: In late February 2018, VCC submitted a request for a revision to the Oro Valley Zoning Code Section 28.5 to allow religious institutions to use electronically-changeable copy signs, if fully compliant with all other existing changeable copy sign and illumination zoning code requirements. The request was processed and a proposal to adopt the revised code was submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission for acceptance at its April 3, 2018 meeting. Prior to that meeting, VCC learned that a new restriction was added to the code that allows the message board portion of the sign to be only 35 percent of the total sign area. VCC considers the 35 percent too restrictive and counterproductive to the benefits gained from investing in a new electronic sign. The message board area of the existing VCC monument sign is just over 50 percent and the three VCC proposals for new electronic signs include message board areas of similar proportions. One of the local vendors has proposed a 60 percent message board area, which he claims to be a very common proportion for monument signs. VCC needs at least 50 percent of the sign to accommodate the three lines of messages currently used on the VCC monument sign. Less than three message lines will not work for VCC. Three VCC representatives attended the April 3rd meeting to answer questions and present their concerns about the message board restriction. Unfortunately, after enduring a four and one-half hour public hearing on rezoning issues, they were allowed only three minutes to talk about the proposed 35 percent restriction. By that time, everyone wanted to go home and the code change was passed as submitted. In my humble opinion, VCC was not given a fair chance to present its case. DISCUSSION: Since the current sign code does not restrict the message board area on monument signs, why is a restriction needed now? We have attached two pictures; one is of our existing monument sign (message area is 50 percent), and the other is a proposed new sign (message area is 60 percent). We believe both signs show good balance and are not at all objectionable. VCC likes the balance and configuration of its existing sign and wants to replicate it as closely as possible. The primary reason for updating our sign at this time is to benefit from electronic technology that will allow elderly VCC staff members to change the weekly message without having to physically deal with the elements of the day. BOTTOM LINE: VCC sincerely appreciates Oro Valley’s efforts to move this amendment forward, but strongly believes it to be counterproductive to most users unless the message board restriction is increased to at least 50 percent. There will be no net gain for the churches and schools unless you increase the message board area allowed. Churches and schools are vital parts of this community and should be allowed adequate signage to properly serve the ever increasing numbers of new residents. Allow the new electronic signs at least the same message areas as currently used so our churches and schools can get with the times and better serve our fellow citizens. Let’s get this right the first time. RECOMMENDATION: Increase the currently-proposed 35 percent message board restriction in the revision to the zoning code text amendment to at least 50 percent, which will allow all churches and schools to better serve this community. VCC POC: Tom Crozier, (520) 977-6032. Town Council Regular Session 3. Meeting Date:05/16/2018 Requested by: Peter Abraham Submitted By:Danielle Tanner, Water Department:Water Information SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: RESOLUTION NO. (R)18-19, AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING INCREASES IN WATER RATES AND SERVICE FEES FOR THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY RECOMMENDATION: On February 20, 2018, the Water Utility Commission voted to recommend that Council approve the proposed water rate increases included in the Preferred Financial Scenario. Staff also recommends Council approval of the rate increases proposed in the Preferred Financial Scenario detailed in the Water Rates Analysis Report dated March 2018. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Pursuant to A.R.S. § 9-511.01 the Council adopted a Notice of Intent to increase water rates on March 7, 2018. The Notice of Intent established a public hearing date for May 16, 2018. The Water Rates Analysis Report was made available for public review and the Notice of Intent was published in the Daily Territorial on April 20, 2018 thereby completing the statutory requirements. The Preferred Financial Scenario in the Water Rates Analysis Report proposes an increase in the potable water base rates. The financial impact of the proposed rates for a customer with a 5/8-inch meter is an increase of $1.83 per month. Customers with a 5/8-inch meter represent 88 percent of the total customer base. The average residential customer uses 8,000 gallons of water and would experience a 4.4 percent increase in their monthly water bill. The financial impact to all customers may be found in Appendix B of the Water Rates Analysis Report. The Preferred Financial Scenario also proposes an increase in the NSF Returned Check Fee. The current fee is $25 and the proposed fee is $30. These fees allow the Utility to recover the costs associated with processing checks returned for insufficient funds. If the proposed rates and fees are approved, they would become effective on July 1, 2018. BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: Town Code Section 15-2-6 states the Oro Valley Water Utility shall be a self-supporting utility funded solely from revenue generated from utility operations. Revenues include water sales, service fees and interest income. The Utility does not receive any funds from the Town’s General Fund. In accordance with the Mayor and Town Council Water Policies, Water Utility staff review water rates and charges on an annual basis. The Oro Valley Water Utility Commission evaluates staff recommendations based on a rates analysis to assure the recommendations meet Town policies and bond covenants. The Commission voted to recommend the Preferred Financial Scenario in the Water Rates Analysis Report on February 20, 2018. The Preferred Financial Scenario includes financial projections for a five-year period; however, the water rates are only approved for the first year of this five-year projection period. In the past, emphasis was placed on developing commodity rates that would promote water conservation. The current tiered rate structure for the commodity rates encourages water conservation as intended. Because of the current tiered rate structure for the commodity rates encourages water conservation as intended. Because of the decline in water consumption, the emphasis of the rate design will now transition to increase the Utility’s fixed cost recovery to assure revenue stability. This will be accomplished with increases in the monthly base rates. The recommendation for rate increases for FY 2018-19 are as follows: Increase in the potable water monthly base rates The financial impact of the proposed rates for a customer with a 5/8-inch meter is an increase of $1.83 per month. Since this is a base rate increase only, the increase will be the same for all customers with this size meter regardless of the volume of water used. Customers with a 5/8-inch meter represent 88 percent of the total customer base and include residential, commercial and irrigation classifications with the vast majority of those being residential. The average residential customer uses 8,000 gallons of water and would experience a 4.4 percent increase in their monthly water bill. The financial impact to all customers may be found in Appendix B of the Water Rates Analysis Report. The reclaimed base rates and commodity rates will not increase as the reclaimed operating costs are being met with reclaimed revenues from the existing rates. Likewise, the potable and reclaimed groundwater preservation fees (GPF) will not increase since the expenses funded with GPF revenue are being met with revenues collected from the existing GPF rates. The Preferred Financial Scenario includes an increase in the NSF Returned Check fees. NSF Returned Check Fees are charged to customers when payments for water bills are returned for insufficient funds. The Utility is proposing an increase of $5 per returned item. The current fee is $25 and the proposed fee is $30. The increase will allow the Utility to recover costs associated with processing checks that are returned for insufficient funds. If the proposed rates and fees are approved, they will become effective July 1, 2018. FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed rate increases are designed to generate sufficient revenue to meet the revenue requirements, increase fixed cost recovery, assure revenue stability and maintain the overall financial health of the Town’s Water Utility. SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to (approve or deny) Resolution No. (R)18-19 authorizing and approving increases in water rates and service fees for the Town of Oro Valley Water Utility. Attachments (R)18-19 Increase Water Rates Water Rates Analysis Report RESOLUTION NO. (R)18-19 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA,AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING INCREASES IN WATER RATES AND SERVICE FEES FOR THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY WHEREAS,pursuant to ARS § 9-511, et seq., the Town has the requisite statutory authority to acquire, own and maintain a water utility for the benefit of the residents within and without the Town’s corporate boundaries; and WHEREAS,pursuant to ARS § 9-511, et seq., the Town finds it necessary to increase water rates, fees and charges for the Oro Valley Water Utility, which increases are described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto; and WHEREAS, on March 7, 2018, Mayor and Council approved Resolution 18-08, providing Notice of Intent to increase water rates and service fees; and WHEREAS, on May 16, 2018, Mayor and Council held a Public Hearing to deliberate and vote on the proposed increases in water rates and service fees. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, that: SECTION 1. The Oro Valley Water Utility increases in water rates, as described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, are hereby authorized and approved. SECTION 2.The Mayor and other administrative officials of the Town of Oro Valley are hereby authorized to take such steps as are necessary to implement the increases in water rates, fees and charges. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, this 16th day of May, 2018. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Dr. Satish I. Hiremath, Mayor ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM: Michael Standish, Town Clerk Tobin Sidles, Legal Services Director Date: Date: EXHIBIT “A” Monthly Base Rates: \ Cost per month. Service Fees: NSF Return Check Fee $30.00 Meter Size Reclaimed Potable (in inches)Base Rate Base Rate 5/8 $ 14.62 $ 16.45 3/4 $ 21.93 $ 24.67 1 $ 36.54 $ 41.11 1.5 $ 73.08 $ 82.22 2 $ 116.94 $ 131.56 3 $ 233.86 $ 263.09 4 $ 365.41 $ 411.09 6 $ 730.83 $ 822.18 8 $1,169.32 $1,315.49 Town Council Regular Session 4. Meeting Date:05/16/2018 Requested by: Stacey Lemos Submitted By:Wendy Gomez, Finance Department:Finance Information SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: RESOLUTION NO. (R)18-20, ADOPTION OF THE TENTATIVE BUDGET FOR FY 2018/19 AND SETTING THE LOCAL ALTERNATIVE EXPENDITURE LIMITATION FOR FY 2018/19 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This item is for Council consideration and adoption of the Town's Tentative Budget for FY 2018/19 in the amount of $142,906,231, a $268,970 decrease from the FY 2018/19 Recommended Budget of $143,175,201, presented on April 18, 2018. This decrease is attributable to reducing the budget for the Palisades Road multi-use path capital improvement program project by $300,000, to reflect the developer-owned portion of the project that will now be completed by the developer, as opposed to the Town. Once their portion is completed and approved, it will be turned over to the Town. In addition, capacity of $31,030 was added to the budget to accommodate two additional, grant-funded license plate readers that will be acquired by the Police Department. These two revisions result in a net decrease of $268,970 for the Tentative Budget. Adoption of this resolution will also set the maximum local expenditure limitation at this amount. Once the limitation is set, expenditures for the year may not exceed that amount. The Council has the authority to make changes to the budget prior to the final budget adoption scheduled for June 6, 2018; however, the total amount of the final budget may not exceed the expenditure limitation set this evening. The Council also has the authority to modify the budget throughout the fiscal year. BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: Staff presented the FY 2018/19 Manager's Recommended Budget in the amount of $143,175,201 at the April 18, 2018 regular Town Council meeting. The full copy of the Recommended Budget has been posted on the Town's website, www.orovalleyaz.gov. The FY 2018/19 Tentative Budget is presented for approval this evening in the amount of $142,906,231, a decrease of $268,970 from the Recommended Budget. This decrease is attributable to reducing the budget for the Palisades Road multi-use path capital improvement program project by $300,000, to reflect the developer-owned portion of the project that will now be completed by the developer, as opposed to the Town. Once their portion is completed and approved, it will be turned over to the Town. In addition, capacity of $31,030 was added to the budget to accommodate two additional, grant-funded license plate readers that will be acquired by the Police Department. These grant funds have already been awarded by the Arizona Department of Homeland Security under the Operation Stonegarden program. These adjustments have been incorporated into the budget figures shown in the attached Official Auditor General budget forms. During the Tentative Budget presentation, staff will also be recommending increases in the overall fuel budget in expectation of increased fuel prices. The impact of this adjustment is estimated at $100,000, allocated among the expectation of increased fuel prices. The impact of this adjustment is estimated at $100,000, allocated among the General Fund, Water Utility Fund and Stormwater Utility Fund. In addition, the decision was made to increase the hourly pay rate for lifeguards in order to retain positions. The impact of this adjustment is estimated at $40,000, allocated between the General Fund and Community Center Fund. Sufficient capacity exists in our reserve balances to make both of these adjustments without the need to increase the overall budget cap. Council budget study sessions were held on May 2 and May 9, 2018, to provide overviews of the larger, service delivery department budgets, Town administrative department budgets, Town benefits and the Capital Improvement Program. This agenda item is a public hearing and approval of the resolution to adopt the FY 2018/19 Tentative Budget in the amount of $142,906,231. Once approved, the attached Auditor General Budget forms with the approved budget amounts will be published for two consecutive weeks prior to the next public hearing for Final Budget approval scheduled for June 6, 2018. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to (approve or deny) Resolution No. (R)18-20, adopting the Tentative Budget for fiscal year 2018/19 and setting the local alternative expenditure limitation for fiscal year 2018/19 at $142,906,231. OR I MOVE... Attachments (R)18-20 Adopting the FY 19/19 Tentative Budget Auditor General Budget Schedules C:\Windows\TEMP\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 7\@BCL@581B1AF0\@BCL@581B1AF0.docx RESOLUTION NO. (R)18-20 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, ADOPTING ESTIMATES OF THE AMOUNTS REQUIRED FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2018/2019 AS A TENTATIVE BUDGET; SETTING FORTH THE RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2018/2019; GIVING NOTICE OF THE TIME FOR THE FINAL PUBLIC HEARING FOR ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2018/2019; PROVIDING FOR CONTINGENCIES; PROVIDING FOR THE USE OF FUNDS; SETTING THE LOCAL ALTERNATIVE EXPENDITURE LIMITATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/2019 WHEREAS, the A.R.S. 42-17101 requires that cities and towns in Arizona adopt a tentative budget by the third Monday in July of each year; and WHEREAS, the Town Council and staff held Council Budget Study Sessions on May 2 and May 9, 2018 to establish and review the proposed budget; and WHEREAS, adoption of the budget will allow the Town of Oro Valley local government to provide the necessary public services for the health, welfare and safety of its citizenry. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona that: SECTION 1. The statements and schedules of the tentative budget for the fiscal year 2018/2019 accompany and be included as part of this Resolution as attached hereto. SECTION 2. The statements and schedules herein contained be adopted for the purpose as hereafter set forth as the tentative budget for the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona for the fiscal year 2018/2019 SECTION 3. The statements setting forth the receipts, expenditures/expenses and amounts collectible for the fiscal year 2018/2019 accompany and be included as part of this resolution. SECTION 4 The local alternative expenditure limitation as noted on the Summary Schedule of Estimated Revenues and Expenditures/Expenses for the fiscal year 2018/2019 be included as part of this resolution. SECTION 5. The Town Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to publish in the manner prescribed by law, the estimates of expenditures/expenses, as hereinafter set forth, together with a notice that the Town Council will meet for the purpose of final public hearing and for adoption of the budget for fiscal year 2018/2019 for the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona on the 6th day of June, 2018. C:\Windows\TEMP\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 7\@BCL@581B1AF0\@BCL@581B1AF0.docx SECTION 6. The money from any fund may be used for any of the appropriations except money specifically restricted by State Law or by Town Ordinance or Resolution. SECTION 7. The various Town officers and employees are hereby directed to perform all acts necessary or desirable to give effect to this resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, this 16 th day of May, 2018. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Dr. Satish I. Hiremath, Mayor ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM: ____________________________ Michael Standish, Town Clerk Tobin Sidles, Legal Services Director Date:_______________________Date:_____________________ OFFICIAL BUDGET FORMS TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Fiscal Year 2019 4/15 Fiscal YearGeneral FundSpecial Revenue Fund Debt Service FundCapital Projects Fund Permanent FundEnterprise Funds AvailableInternal Service Funds Total All Funds2018 Adopted/Adjusted Budgeted Expenditures/Expenses* E 45,723,048 12,972,007 1,080,065 36,871,203 0 25,884,371 6,036,811 128,567,5052018 Actual Expenditures/Expenses** E 33,628,359 11,778,607 1,024,706 10,007,588 0 19,228,511 4,275,462 79,943,2332019 Fund Balance/Net Position at July 1*** 15,035,308 1,025,842 99,564 21,318,245 9,514,215 578,559 47,571,7332019 Primary Property Tax LevyB002019 Secondary Property Tax LevyB02019 Estimated Revenues Other than Property Taxes C 38,788,563 10,540,507 332,006 15,837,355 0 19,807,733 3,828,334 89,134,4982019 Other Financing Sources D 0 0 0 3,000,000 0 3,200,000 0 6,200,0002019 Other Financing (Uses) D 0 000000 02019 Interfund Transfers In D 120,000 550,000 884,094 3,403,000 0 0 0 4,957,0942019 Interfund Transfers (Out) D 4,700,514 253,999 0 0 0 2,581 0 4,957,0942019 Reduction for Amounts Not Available:LESS: Amounts for Future Debt Retirement:00002019 Total Financial Resources Available49,243,357 11,862,350 1,315,664 43,558,600 0 32,519,367 4,406,893 142,906,2312019 Budgeted Expenditures/Expenses E 49,243,357 11,862,350 1,315,664 43,558,600 0 32,519,367 4,406,893 142,906,231EXPENDITURE LIMITATION COMPARISON2018 20191. Budgeted expenditures/expenses 128,567,505$ 142,906,231$ 2. Add/subtract: estimated net reconciling items3. Budgeted expenditures/expenses adjusted for reconciling items128,567,505 142,906,231 4. Less: estimated exclusions5. Amount subject to the expenditure limitation128,567,505$ 142,906,231$ 6. EEC expenditure limitation128,567,505$ 142,906,231$ X******Amounts on this line represent Fund Balance/Net Position amounts except for amounts not in spendable form (e.g., prepaids and inventories) or legally or contractually required to be maintained intact (e.g., principal of a permanent fund).SchFUNDSIncludes Expenditure/Expense Adjustments Approved in the current year from Schedule E. The city/town does not levy property taxes and does not have special assessment districts for which property taxes are levied. Therefore, Schedule B has been omitted.TOWN OF ORO VALLEYSummary Schedule of Estimated Revenues and Expenditures/ExpensesFiscal Year 2019Includes actual amounts as of the date the proposed budget was prepared, adjusted for estimated activity for the remainder of the fiscal year. 4/15SCHEDULE A ESTIMATED REVENUES ACTUAL REVENUES* ESTIMATED REVENUES 2018 2018 2019 GENERAL FUND Local taxes Local Sales Tax $ 16,544,573 $ 17,611,208 18,752,418 Cable Franchise Tax 620,000 655,379 685,000 Licenses and permits Licenses 200,000 202,000 204,000 Permits 1,740,236 2,055,454 1,797,596 Fees 122,885 197,719 134,500 Intergovernmental State/County Shared 11,636,928 11,540,562 11,708,575 State Grants 234,760 114,200 118,800 Federal Grants 471,342 426,836 596,162 Reimbursements 1,698,360 1,557,331 1,715,900 Other 95,000 90,000 90,000 Charges for services Reimbursements 151,000 135,000 135,000 Fees 1,244,691 1,191,535 1,259,945 Other 814,762 815,176 1,013,917 Fines and forfeits Fines 120,000 120,000 120,000 Interest on investments Interest Income 103,000 (11,722)150,000 Miscellaneous Miscellaneous 233,000 295,714 306,750 Total General Fund $ 36,030,537 $ 36,996,392 $ 38,788,563 * TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Revenues Other Than Property Taxes Fiscal Year 2019 Includes actual revenues recognized on the modified accrual or accrual basis as of the date the proposed budget was prepared, plus estimated revenues for the remainder of the fiscal year. SOURCE OF REVENUES 4/15 SCHEDULE C ESTIMATED REVENUES ACTUAL REVENUES* ESTIMATED REVENUES 2018 2018 2019 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Revenues Other Than Property Taxes Fiscal Year 2019 SOURCE OF REVENUES SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Highway User Revenue Fund Highway User Fuel Tax $ 3,363,581 $ 3,363,581 3,291,659 Permits 57,000 44,948 48,700 Interest Income 36,994 26,524 50,000 Charges for Services State Grants 100,000 114,011 165,000 Other 2,000 4,103 3,000 $ 3,559,575 $ 3,553,167 3,558,359 Bed Tax Fund Local Sales Tax $ 1,126,955 $ 1,279,940 Interest Income 8,011 1,678 $ 1,134,966 $ 1,281,618 Seizures & Forfeitures Seizures & Forfeitures $ 275,000 $ 275,000 325,000 Interest Income 3,600 $ 275,000 $ 278,600 325,000 Impound Fee Fund Fees $ 40,000 $ 34,288 $ 40,000 $ 34,288 Community Center Fund Local Sales Tax $ 2,308,112 $ 2,308,112 2,384,558 Charges for Services 4,159,931 4,344,109 4,253,088 Other 27,861 19,502 19,502 $ 6,495,904 $ 6,671,723 6,657,148 Total Special Revenue Funds $ 11,505,445 $ 11,819,396 $ 10,540,507 * Includes actual revenues recognized on the modified accrual or accrual basis as of the date the proposed budget was prepared, plus estimated revenues for the remainder of the fiscal year. 4/15 SCHEDULE C ESTIMATED REVENUES ACTUAL REVENUES* ESTIMATED REVENUES 2018 2018 2019 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Revenues Other Than Property Taxes Fiscal Year 2019 SOURCE OF REVENUES DEBT SERVICE FUNDS Municipal Debt Service Fund Federal Grants $ 51,403 $ 51,403 47,578 Interest Income 3,500 Miscellaneous 90,000 100,000 100,000 $ 141,403 $ 154,903 147,578 Oracle Road Improvement District Special Assessments $ 186,520 $ 186,520 184,428 $ 186,520 $ 186,520 184,428 Total Debt Service Funds $ 327,923 $ 341,423 $ 332,006 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS Alternative Water Resources Development Impact Fee Fund Development Impact Fees $ 1,387,819 $ 1,496,413 1,476,597 Interest Income 34,485 4,905 34,485 $ 1,422,304 $ 1,501,318 1,511,082 Potable Water System Development Impact Fee Fund Development Impact Fees $ 691,333 $ 743,413 735,557 Interest Income 37,238 (11,523)37,238 $ 728,571 $ 731,890 772,795 Townwide Roadway Development Impact Fee Fund Development Impact Fees $ 906,401 $ 724,670 510,964 Interest Income 5,000 17,800 10,000 State Grants 250,000 $ 911,401 $ 742,470 770,964 Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Fund Development Impact Fees $ 294,505 $ 261,080 261,936 Interest Income 2,000 2,000 $ 294,505 $ 263,080 263,936 Police Impact Fee Fund Development Impact Fees $ 128,207 $ 141,069 111,678 Interest Income 2,000 $ 128,207 $ 143,069 111,678 General Government Impact Fee Fund Interest Income $ $ 15 $$15 Capital Fund Miscellaneous $ $ 420,400 $ $ 420,400 PAG/RTA Fund State Grants $ 7,899,982 $ 5,551,200 11,964,000 Other 22,500 71,029 22,500 $ 7,922,482 $ 5,622,229 11,986,500 Total Capital Projects Funds $ 11,407,470 $ 9,004,071 $ 15,837,355 * Includes actual revenues recognized on the modified accrual or accrual basis as of the date the proposed budget was prepared, plus estimated revenues for the remainder of the fiscal year. 4/15 SCHEDULE C ESTIMATED REVENUES ACTUAL REVENUES* ESTIMATED REVENUES 2018 2018 2019 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Revenues Other Than Property Taxes Fiscal Year 2019 SOURCE OF REVENUES ENTERPRISE FUNDS Water Utility Fund Water Sales $ 12,075,700 $ 13,403,654 13,152,900 Charges for Services 3,225,300 3,331,215 3,183,500 Interest Income 93,164 (16,969)62,333 Miscellaneous 2,745 $ 15,394,164 $ 16,720,645 16,398,733 Stormwater Utility Fund Charges for Services $ 1,402,500 $ 1,394,180 1,407,000 Interest Income 500 3,103 2,000 State Grants 2,000,000 Miscellaneous 51 $ 1,403,000 $ 1,397,334 3,409,000 Total Enterprise Funds $ 16,797,164 $ 18,117,979 $ 19,807,733 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Fleet Fund Fleet Services $ 760,000 $ 836,858 Miscellaneous 394,896 400,896 $ 1,154,896 $ 1,237,754 Benefit Self Insurance Fund Miscellaneous $ 3,645,264 $ 3,651,064 3,828,334 $ 3,645,264 $ 3,651,064 3,828,334 Total Internal Service Funds $ 4,800,160 $ 4,888,818 $ 3,828,334 TOTAL ALL FUNDS $ 80,868,699 $ 81,168,079 $ 89,134,498 * Includes actual revenues recognized on the modified accrual or accrual basis as of the date the proposed budget was prepared, plus estimated revenues for the remainder of the fiscal year. 4/15 SCHEDULE C FUND SOURCES <USES> IN <OUT> GENERAL FUND Transfer from Community Center Fund $ $ 120,000 $ Transfer to Highway Fund 550,000 Transfer to Municipal Debt Service Fund 744,514 Transfer to Oracle Rd Improvement District Fund 3,000 Transfer to Capital Fund 3,403,000 Total General Fund $ $ $ 120,000 $ 4,700,514 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Highway Fund $ $ 550,000 Community Center Fund 253,999 Total Special Revenue Funds $ $ $ 550,000 $ 253,999 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS Municipal Debt Service Fund $ $ $ 881,094 $ Oracle Road Improvement District Fund 3,000 Total Debt Service Funds $ $ $ 884,094 $ CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS Capital Fund $ $ $ 3,403,000 Community Center Bond Fund 3,000,000 Total Capital Projects Funds $ 3,000,000 $ $ 3,403,000 $ ENTERPRISE FUNDS Water Utility Fund $ 3,200,000 $ $ $ 2,581 Total Enterprise Funds $ 3,200,000 $ $ $ 2,581 TOTAL ALL FUNDS $ 6,200,000 $ $ 4,957,094 $ 4,957,094 2019 2019 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Other Financing Sources/<Uses> and Interfund Transfers Fiscal Year 2019 OTHER FINANCING INTERFUND TRANSFERS 4/15 SCHEDULE D ADOPTED BUDGETED EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES EXPENDITURE/ EXPENSE ADJUSTMENTS APPROVED ACTUAL EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES* BUDGETED EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES 2018 2018 2018 2019 GENERAL FUND Clerk $ 485,098 $ $ 485,098 444,559 Council 214,759 214,759 210,494 Community Development & Public Works 4,893,469 4,844,157 Community and Economic Development 2,869,324 Public Works 3,416,271 Administrative Services 3,375,735 3,343,602 4,450,555 General Administration 1,682,216 1,682,216 2,696,700 Legal 779,670 749,302 793,567 Magistrate Court 874,282 874,282 884,385 Town Manager's Office 844,708 828,524 1,251,370 Parks and Recreation 3,667,092 3,554,323 3,581,586 Police 17,108,674 16,977,096 16,557,555 Contingency Reserve 11,797,345 75,000 12,086,991 Total General Fund $ 45,723,048 $ $ 33,628,359 $ 49,243,357 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Highway User Revenue Fund $ 5,085,635 $ $ 4,099,535 4,912,895 Seizures and Forfeitures 420,336 302,288 604,393 Bed Tax Fund 1,070,446 850,481 Impound Fee Fund 65,345 59,606 Community Center Fund 6,330,245 6,466,697 6,345,062 Total Special Revenue Funds $ 12,972,007 $ $ 11,778,607 $ 11,862,350 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS Municipal Debt Service Fund $ 883,551 $ $ 835,186 1,121,499 Oracle Road Improvement District Fund 196,514 189,520 194,165 Total Debt Service Funds $ 1,080,065 $ $ 1,024,706 $ 1,315,664 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS Townwide Roadway Dev Impact Fee Fund $ 3,935,497 $ $ 1,458,500 3,152,090 Alternative Water Rscs Dev Impact Fee Fund 7,627,267 186,844 9,297,630 Potable Water System Dev Impact Fee Fund 6,173,575 356,627 6,706,102 Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Fund 239,112 502,602 Police Impact Fee Fund 623,245 760,029 General Government Impact Fee Fund 3,525 3,539 Recreation In Lieu Fee Fund 15,718 15,718 Capital Fund 4,034,577 1,811,423 7,253,256 PAG/RTA Fund 8,518,687 5,625,857 12,867,634 Energy Efficiency Project Fund 700,000 568,337 Capital Project Bond Fund 5,000,000 Community Center Bond Fund 3,000,000 Total Capital Projects Funds $ 36,871,203 $ $ 10,007,588 $ 43,558,600 ENTERPRISE FUNDS Water Utility Fund $ 23,965,923 $ $ 17,922,811 28,415,612 Stormwater Utility Fund 1,918,448 1,305,700 4,103,755 Total Enterprise Funds $ 25,884,371 $ $ 19,228,511 $ 32,519,367 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Fleet Fund $ 2,377,939 $ $ 1,316,314 Benefit Self Insurance Fund 3,658,872 2,959,148 4,406,893 Total Internal Service Funds $ 6,036,811 $ $ 4,275,462 4,406,893 TOTAL ALL FUNDS $ 128,567,505 $ $ 79,943,233 $ 142,906,231 * Expenditures/Expenses by Fund Fiscal Year 2019 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Includes actual expenditures/expenses recognized on the modified accrual or accrual basis as of the date the proposed budget was prepared, plus estimated expenditures/expenses for the remainder of the fiscal year. FUND/DEPARTMENT 4/15 SCHEDULE E ADOPTED BUDGETED EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES EXPENDITURE/ EXPENSE ADJUSTMENTS APPROVED ACTUAL EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES* BUDGETED EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES 2018 2018 2018 2019 Clerk: General Fund $ 485,098 $ 485,098 $ 444,559 Department Total $ 485,098 $ $ 485,098 $ 444,559 Council: General Fund $ 214,759 $ $ 214,759 $ 210,494 Department Total $ 214,759 $ $ 214,759 $ 210,494 Community Development & Public Works: General Fund $ 4,893,469 $ $ 4,844,157 $ Highway Fund 5,085,635 4,099,535 $ Townwide Roadway Dev Impact Fee Fund 3,935,497 1,458,500 Stormwater Utility Fund 1,918,448 1,305,700 Fleet Fund 2,377,939 1,316,314 PAG/RTA Fund 8,518,687 5,625,857 Department Total $ 26,729,675 $ $ 18,650,063 $ Community and Economic Development: General Fund $ $ $ $ 2,869,324 Department Total $ 214,759 $ $ $ 2,869,324 Public Works: General Fund $ $ $ $ 3,416,271 Highway Fund $ 4,912,895 Stormwater Utility Fund 4,103,755 PAG/RTA Fund 12,867,634 Townwide Roadway Dev Impact Fee Fund 3,152,090 Department Total $ $ $ $ 28,452,645 Administrative Services: General Fund $ 3,375,735 $ $ 3,343,602 $ 4,450,555 Department Total $ 3,375,735 $ $ 3,343,602 $ 4,450,555 General Administration: General Fund $ 1,682,216 $ $ 1,682,216 $ 2,696,700 General Fund - Contingency Reserve 11,797,345 75,000 12,086,991 Municipal Debt Service Fund 883,551 835,186 1,121,499 Oracle Road Improvement District Fund 196,514 189,520 194,165 Benefit Self Insurance Fund 3,658,872 2,959,148 4,406,893 General Government Impact Fee Fund 3,525 3,539 Capital Fund 4,034,577 1,811,423 7,253,256 Energy Efficiency Project Fund 700,000 568,337 Capital Project Bond Fund 5,000,000 Department Total $ 27,956,600 $ $ 8,120,830 $ 27,763,043 Legal: General Fund $ 779,670 $ $ 749,302 $ 793,567 Department Total $ 779,670 $ $ 749,302 $ 793,567 * Expenditures/Expenses by Department Fiscal Year 2019 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY DEPARTMENT/FUND Includes actual expenditures/expenses recognized on the modified accrual or accrual basis as of the date the proposed budget was prepared, plus estimated expenditures/expenses for the remainder of the fiscal year. 4/15 SCHEDULE F ADOPTED BUDGETED EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES EXPENDITURE/ EXPENSE ADJUSTMENTS APPROVED ACTUAL EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES* BUDGETED EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES 2018 2018 2018 2019 Expenditures/Expenses by Department Fiscal Year 2019 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY DEPARTMENT/FUND Magistrate Court: General Fund $ 874,282 $ $ 874,282 $ 884,385 Department Total $ 874,282 $ $ 874,282 $ 884,385 Town Manager's Office: General Fund $ 844,708 $ $ 828,524 $ 1,251,370 Bed Tax Fund 1,070,446 850,481 Department Total $ 1,915,154 $ $ 1,679,005 $ 1,251,370 Parks and Recreation: General Fund $ 3,667,092 $ $ 3,554,323 $ 3,581,586 Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Fund 239,112 502,602 Recreation In Lieu Fee Fund 15,718 15,718 Community Center Fund 6,330,245 6,466,697 6,345,062 Community Center Bond Fund 3,000,000 Department Total $ 10,252,167 $ $ 10,021,020 $ 13,444,968 Police: General Fund $ 17,108,674 $ $ 16,977,096 $ 16,557,555 Seizures and Forfeitures 420,336 302,288 604,393 Police Impact Fee Fund 623,245 760,029 Impound Fee Fund 65,345 59,606 Department Total $ 18,217,600 $ $ 17,338,990 $ 17,921,977 Water Utility: Water Utility Fund $ 23,965,923 $ $ 17,922,811 $ 28,415,612 Alternative Water Rscs Dev Impact Fee Fund 7,627,267 186,844 9,297,630 Potable Water System Dev Impact Fee Fund 6,173,575 356,627 6,706,102 Department Total $ 37,766,765 $ $ 18,466,282 $ 44,419,344 *Includes actual expenditures/expenses recognized on the modified accrual or accrual basis as of the date the proposed budget was prepared, plus estimated expenditures/expenses for the remainder of the fiscal year. 4/15 SCHEDULE F Full-Time Equivalent (FTE)Employee Salaries and Hourly Costs Retirement Costs Healthcare CostsOther Benefit CostsTotal Estimated Personnel Compensation2019 2019 2019 2019 2019 2019291.82 18,439,791 4,084,526 2,532,564 1,954,469 27,011,350Highway Fund 27.15 1,713,720 202,219 273,550 188,197 2,377,686Seizures and Forfeitures 1.00 49,911 18,487 11,446 6,821 86,665Community Center Fund 20.61 648,587 16,073 34,858 54,891 754,409Total Special Revenue Funds48.76 $ 2,412,218 $ 236,779 $ 319,854 $ 249,909 $ 3,218,760Water Utility Fund 39.48 2,423,543 283,950 399,487 234,195 3,341,175Stormwater Utility Fund 10.25 566,227 66,815 78,124 57,821 768,987Total Enterprise Funds49.73 $ 2,989,770 $ 350,765 $ 477,611 $ 292,016 $ 4,110,162TOTAL ALL FUNDS390.31 $ 23,841,779 $ 4,672,070 $ 3,330,029 $ 2,496,394 $ 34,340,272SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDSENTERPRISE FUNDSFUNDTOWN OF ORO VALLEYFull-Time Employees and Personnel CompensationFiscal Year 2019GENERAL FUND 4/15SCHEDULE G