Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPackets - Council Packets (862)Council Meeting Regular Session July 18, 2018 1 Town Council Meeting Announcements 2 Upcoming Meetings 3 Upcoming Meetings 4 5 Proposed Office Development West side of Oracle Road, north of Greenock Drive Town Council July 18, 2018 6 Good evening… Purpose Oracle Road Greenock Dr. Conceptual Site and Landscape Plan Conceptual Architecture Planning and Zoning Commission recommended conditional approval 7 Oracle Road Pusch View Lane OV Estates Future residential The Place at Rock Ridge Apartments Desert Greens Dental Office Greenock Drive School & offices 8 Conceptual Site and Landscape Plan Two office buildings Phase 1-front building (yellow) Phase 2-rear building (blue) Single-story, 18’ Access off Oracle Road Natural screening of development Oracle Road 9 Conceptual Architecture Front view (facing Oracle Road) Right view (facing apartments) Left view (facing homes) Rear view 10 Compatibility with Surrounding Architecture Natural hues Metal-seam roof Stone accents 11 Public Participation One neighborhood meeting held Increased traffic Drainage concerns Use of Phase 2 (rear) building View impacts Mitigation measures proposed: Access from Oracle Road Post-development stormwater flows cannot increase existing flows Single-story buildings Natural screening Separated from surrounding homes by 85’ drainage way Planning and Zoning Commission Approved an increase in parking spaces and removal of unhealthy plants along Oracle Road Discussion regarding drainage 12 Summary and Recommendation Request meets the Design Principles and applicable Standards of the Zoning Code Planning and Zoning Commission recommended conditional approval 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Proposed Access to Como Drive Northwest corner of Tangerine Road and Como Drive Town Council July 18, 2018 22 Good evening… Purpose Revised Conceptual Site and Landscape Plans Parking lot expansion Access to Como Drive Planning and Zoning Commission recommended conditional approval Tangerine Road Limewood Drive Como Drive La Cholla Blvd. 23 Como Drive Tangerine Road La Cholla Blvd. Limewood Drive Town Limit Wilson K-8 Larger-lot Residential Episcopal Church of the Apostles 24 Revised Conceptual Site and Landscape Plans Como Drive Additional 98 parking spaces Landscaped parking islands Earthen berms and trees to screen parking area Access onto Como Drive Improved from access point to Tangerine Road Raised median to prevent traffic from exiting north onto Como Drive Tangerine Road Como Drive 25 Public Participation Two meetings held Increased traffic and dust along Como Drive Revised site plan to include median preventing traffic from exiting north onto Como Planning and Zoning Commission Traffic traveling south on Como Drive to access church property Dust control techniques Drainage improvements to Como Drive 26 Summary and Recommendation Request meets the Design Guidelines and Design Standards in the Zoning Code Planning and Zoning Commission recommended conditional approval 27 28 Como Drive Tangerine Road La Cholla Blvd. Limewood Drive 29 30 ARCHITECTURE | MECHANICAL | ELECTRICAL | CIVIL | TECHNOLOGY 2939 E Broadway Blvd.  | Tucson, AZ 85716  |  P 520.881.4546  |  F 520.795.1822 3030 N 3rd St, Suite 600  |  Phoenix, AZ 85012  |  P 602.368.9393 Victory Worship Parking Lot Expansion + Access to Como Drive Brian Hagedon, AIA GLHN Architects & Engineers 31 July 18, 2018 32 GLHN ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS, INC. SITE AERIAL 32 July 18, 2018 33 GLHN ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS, INC. ORIGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 33 July 18, 2018 34 GLHN ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS, INC. COMO DRIVE EXTENSION 34 July 18, 2018 35 GLHN ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS, INC. PHASE 1 35 July 18, 2018 36 GLHN ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS, INC. PHASE 2 36 July 18, 2018 37 GLHN ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS, INC. COMO ORIGINAL INTERSECTION 37 July 18, 2018 38 GLHN ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS, INC. THANK YOU 38 39 Proposed Code Amendment for Communication Facility Standards Town Council July 18, 2018 40 Good evening… Purpose Revise communication facility requirements to: 1. Update setback requirements 2. Conform with Federal law Address collocations and modifications General conformance Amendment recognized in the Planning Division 17-19 Work Plan Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval Our purpose here tonight is to consider… - What is a CSP? - Use the Zoning Code (Design Principles and Standards) – subdivision design, connectivity, compatibility PAD Development Standards 41 1. Update setback requirements Current Code: New facilities must be setback two (2) feet for every (1) foot from: All buildings (including on-site) All property lines Overhead wires Proposed amendment: Comply with zoning district’s building setbacks Setback two (2) feet for every one (1) foot in height from properties where primary use is a dwelling Example: Area a new 50’ pole could be located and meet all required setbacks 100’ 42 2. Conformance with Federal law Federal law Collocations and modifications without substantial changes to the physical dimensions must be approved Flexibility may be warranted when there are gaps in service Current code: Encourages collocation but does not define substantial change Variation from code requires Board of Adjustment approval Proposed amendment: Defines substantial changes based on FCC guidelines Allows the Planning and Zoning Administrator authority to waive requirements if there is a legal conflict 43 General Plan Conformance Proposed amendment conforms to the General Plan to the greatest extent possible while balancing the legal requirements established by Federal law SD.6: Protect scenic corridors, public park and trail view sheds, and the distinctive visual character and visual appeal of Oro Valley. Policy I.1: Accommodate community services and utilities that meet the larger community needs and goals. Policy I.2: Consider aesthetics and visual impacts of utilities and aging infrastructure during the planning, design or upgrade process, to the extent reasonably possible. 44 Summary and Recommendation Amendment recognized in the Planning Division 17-19 Work Plan Request satisfies the Your Voice, Our Future General Plan Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 45 46 Verizon on Cool Drive Near the southwest corner of Cool Drive and Oracle Road Town Council July 18, 2018 47 Good evening… Purpose Proposed new 50’ cell tower Replacing decommissioned tower Tier II Minor Communication Facility Discernible Stealth design Dimensional requirements Final approval contingent on associated code amendment Planning and Zoning Commission recommended conditional approval South facing view of proposed tower Our purpose here tonight is to consider… - What is a CSP? - Use the Zoning Code (Design Principles and Standards) – subdivision design, connectivity, compatibility PAD Development Standards 48 Mattamy Homes Parcel 5F Subject Property Future Moore Road Palisades South Tucson Property Cool Drive Magee Road Oracle Road Offices Car wash Apartments 49 Tier II Communication Facility New 50’ foot tower Immediate use by Verizon and Sprint Setbacks Meets all building setbacks, except from the western property line 100 feet from property lines where the primary use or purpose is for a dwelling 23’ 50 Stealth Applications Mono-elm camouflaging Will be revised to be painted and shaped to better integrate with surrounding native vegetation Antennas placed in “socks” to look like leaves Ground equipment screened by opaque wall Existing southwest facing view Proposed southwest facing view 51 Public Participation One neighborhood meeting held Impacts on views Co-locating surrounding cell facilities on proposed site Planning and Zoning Commission Camouflaging techniques Opportunities for additional collocation Mitigation measures proposed: Work with staff to better integrate the mono-elm with surrounding native plants Opportunity for a third provider 52 General Plan Conformance Policy I.1. Accommodate community services and utilities that meet the larger community needs and goals. Policy I.2. Consider aesthetics and visual impacts of utilities and aging infrastructure during the planning, design or upgrade process, to the extent reasonably possible. Policy I.4. Identify and facilitate the replacement and timely upgrade of aging infrastructure as needed. 53 Summary and Recommendation Request meets the Your Voice, Our Future General Plan and revised zoning code Planning and Zoning Commission recommended conditional approval 54 55 Sun State towers: AZ02-070 Saguaro 333 W. Cool drive Proposed Candidate Analysis Town of Oro Valley 56 Proposed design of new facility 55’ mono-elm design (50’ to top of tower with 5’ branches extending beyond) 3-sector array with 4 antennas per sector, total of 12 antennas Co-locatable (other carriers will be able to use facility) Located in rear of APN 225-14-170C at 333 W. Cool Drive, Oro Valley 57 Necessity of proposed facility This facility is bring proposed to replace an existing facility in the area that is scheduled to be decommissioned. The proposed facility is required to maintain Verizon Wireless’s service goals for the area and continue to provide effective, efficient coverage. 58 Coverage with proposed facility TUC Peppersauce (proposed) Existing facility (to be decommissioned) 59 Coverage with no action No Active Facility 60 Search area map The red box indicates the target area for the proposed project. Locations outside of the red box do not meet objectives for the site. The relocation of the existing site is an immediate need to avoid losing existing coverage. 61 Alternate candidate analysis Blue star = existing site being removed. Green star = proposed location Orange star(s) = locations reviewed for viability as rooftop installations 62 63 64 65 R-6 Zoning Code Amendment for Attached Dwellings Town Council July 18, 2018 Good evening Chair, members of the Commission My name is… 66 Purpose – Permit “Attached Dwellings” in R-6 Zones Condominiums Patio Homes Townhomes Would it be effective for me to provide examples of townhouses for this presentation? 67 Location of R-6 Zoning Near high activity: Major streets (Arterials) Commercial areas High density residential Provides compatible transitions 68 Transitions 69 Development Standards Use existing standards Clarify that single-family architectural standards do not apply for “attached dwellings” Include a minimum distance of 10 feet between detached units The third element of the proposed amendment is to clarify all development standards related to attached dwellings. The Town’s current code definition includes the term single-family. Single-family dwellings are subject to the single-family architectural standards. However, townhouses are only permitted in multi-family districts. The proposed amendment clarifies that townhouses are attached units with a party wall and therefore subject to the multi-family architectural design standards. To clarify development standards for all attached dwellings, we are also proposing a 10 foot minimum setback between detached buildings. 70 Recommendation Your Voice, Our Future General Plan Provide diverse land use transitions adjacent to neighborhoods Incorporate effective compatibility standards Scope limited to R-6 district Planning & Zoning Commission recommends approval 71 72 R-6 Multi-family Residential Zoning “This district is intended to”… “support multi-family residential development” “accommodate an increased density of population” “enhance the residential character of a multi-family project and produce a high quality environment” 73 74