Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPackets - Council Packets (1860)       *AMENDED (3/15/24, 11:00 AM) AGENDA ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR AND STUDY SESSION MARCH 20, 2024 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CAÑADA DRIVE For information on public comment procedures, please see the instructions for in person and/or virtual speakers at the end of the agenda. To watch and/or listen to the public meeting online, please visit https://www.orovalleyaz.gov/town/departments/town-clerk/meetings-and-agendas Executive Sessions – Upon a vote of the majority of the Town Council, the Council may enter into Executive Sessions pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes §38-431.03 (A)(3) to obtain legal advice on matters listed on the Agenda.        REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 5:00 PM   CALL TO ORDER   ROLL CALL   EXECUTIVE SESSION   1.Pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.03(A)(1) and (A)(3) Personnel matter - Town Magistrate annual performance review   RESUME REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM   CALL TO ORDER   ROLL CALL   1.APPROVAL OF ANY DIRECTION TO THE TOWN ATTORNEY AND/OR NECESSARY STAFF AS DISCUSSED IN EXECUTIVE SESSION PERTAINING TO THE ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW OF THE TOWN MAGISTRATE   PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE   UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS   MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS ON CURRENT EVENTS   TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT ON CURRENT EVENTS Update regarding Visit Tucson Agreement   ORDER OF BUSINESS: MAYOR WILL REVIEW THE ORDER OF THE MEETING   INFORMATIONAL ITEMS   CALL TO AUDIENCE – At this time, any member of the public is allowed to address the Mayor and Town Council on any issue not listed on today’s agenda. Pursuant to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, individual Council Members may ask Town Staff to review the matter, ask that the matter be placed on a future agenda, or respond to criticism made by speakers. However, the Mayor and Council may not discuss or take legal action on matters raised during “Call to Audience.” In order to speak during “Call to Audience” please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card.   PRESENTATIONS   CONSENT AGENDA (Consideration and/or possible action)   A.Minutes - March 6, 2024   REGULAR AGENDA   2.PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING FOUR ITEMS RELATED TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF 132 MULTIFAMILY UNITS ON AN APPROXIMATELY 8.7-ACRE SITE LOCATED ON VISTOSO HIGHLANDS DRIVE, APPROXIMATELY 1/4-MILE WEST OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD ON THE GOLF COURSE OLD CLUBHOUSE SITE. THE APPLICATIONS INCLUDE: ITEM A: ORDINANCE NO. (O)24-04: REZONING (PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT) OF APPROXIMATELY 0.7 ACRES FROM OPEN SPACE TO RECREATION /GOLF COURSE AND TO RELOCATE A PLANNED TRAIL TO ADJACENT TOWN PROPERTY ITEM B: DEVELOPMENT AND LANDSCAPE PLANS ITEM C: AMENDED EASEMENT AGREEMENT ITEM D: ARCHITECTURE   3.REQUESTING FUNDING FOR THE CREATION OF AN ALTERNATIVE GOLF ROUTE AT PUSCH RIDGE GOLF COURSE ALONG HOLE #7   FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS (The Council may bring forth general topics for future meeting agendas. Council may not discuss, deliberate or take any action on the topics presented pursuant to ARS 38-431.02H)   *ADJOURNMENT OF THE REGULAR SESSION   *STUDY SESSION   *CALL TO ORDER   *STUDY SESSION AGENDA   1.*DISCUSSION REGARDING THE VISTOSO TRAILS NATURE PRESERVE MASTER PLAN AND SURVEYS, AND PRIORITIZATION OF IMPROVEMENTS   ADJOURNMENT The Mayor and Council may, at the discretion of the meeting chairperson, discuss any Agenda item.   POSTED: 3/14/24 at 5:00 p.m. by dt AMENDED AGENDA POSTED: 3/15/24 at 5:00 p.m. by dt When possible, a packet of agenda materials as listed above is available for public inspection at least 24 hours prior to the Council meeting in the office of the Town Clerk between the hours of 8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. The Town of Oro Valley complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If any person with a disability needs any type of accommodation, please notify the Town Clerk’s Office at least five days prior to the Council meeting at 229-4700. PUBLIC COMMENT ON AGENDA ITEMS The Town has modified its public comment procedures for its public bodies to allow for limited remote/virtual comment via Zoom. The public may provide comments remotely only on items posted as required Public Hearings, provided the speaker registers 24 hours prior to the meeting. For all other items, the public may complete a blue speaker card to be recognized in person by the Mayor, according to all other rules and procedures. Written comments can also be emailed to Town Clerk Michael Standish at mstandish@orovalleyaz.gov for distribution to the Town Council prior to the meeting. Further instructions to speakers are noted below. INSTRUCTIONS TO IN-PERSON SPEAKERS Members of the public shall be allowed to speak on posted public hearings and during Call to Audience when attending the meeting in person. The public may be allowed to speak on other posted items on the agenda at the discretion of the Mayor. If you wish to address the Town Council on any item(s) on this agenda, please complete a blue speaker card located on the Agenda table at the back of the room and give it to the Town Clerk. Please indicate on the blue speaker card which item number and topic you wish to speak on, or, if you wish to speak during Call to Audience, please specify what you wish to discuss. Please step forward to the podium when the Mayor calls on you to address the Council. 1. For the record, please state your name and whether or not you are a Town resident. 2. Speak only on the issue currently being discussed by Council. You will only be allowed to address the Council one time regarding the topic being discussed. 3. Please limit your comments to 3 minutes. 4. During Call to Audience, you may address the Council on any matter that is not on the agenda. 5. Any member of the public speaking must speak in a courteous and respectful manner to those 5. Any member of the public speaking must speak in a courteous and respectful manner to those present. INSTRUCTIONS TO VIRTUAL SPEAKERS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS Members of the public may attend the meeting virtually and request to speak virtually on any agenda item that is listed as a Public Hearing. If you wish to address the Town Council virtually during any listed Public Hearing, please complete the online speaker form by clicking here https://forms.orovalleyaz.gov/forms/bluecard at least 24 hours prior to the start of the meeting. You must provide a valid email address in order to register. Town Staff will email you a link to the Zoom meeting the day of the meeting. After being recognized by the Mayor, staff will unmute your microphone access and you will have 3 minutes to address the Council. Further instructions regarding remote participation will be included in the email. Thank you for your cooperation.    Town Council Regular Session 1. Meeting Date:03/20/2024   Submitted By:Mike Standish, Town Clerk's Office Department:Town Clerk's Office SUBJECT: Pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.03(A)(1) and (A)(3) Personnel matter - Town Magistrate annual performance review RECOMMENDATION: N/A EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: N/A BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: N/A SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to go into Executive Session. Attachments No file(s) attached.    Town Council Regular Session 1. Meeting Date:03/20/2024   Submitted By:Mike Standish, Town Clerk's Office Department:Town Clerk's Office SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF ANY DIRECTION TO THE TOWN ATTORNEY AND/OR NECESSARY STAFF AS DISCUSSED IN EXECUTIVE SESSION PERTAINING TO THE ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW OF THE TOWN MAGISTRATE RECOMMENDATION: N/A EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: N/A BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: N/A SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to... Attachments No file(s) attached.    Town Council Regular Session A. Meeting Date:03/20/2024   Requested by: Mike Standish Submitted By:Michelle Stine, Town Clerk's Office Department:Town Clerk's Office SUBJECT: Minutes - March 6, 2024 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval.  EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: N/A BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: N/A SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to approve (approve with the following changes), the March 6, 2024, minutes.  Attachments 3-6-24 Draft Minutes  D R A F T   MINUTES ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR AND STUDY SESSION MARCH 6, 2024 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CAÑADA DRIVE            REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM   CALL TO ORDER    Mayor Winfield called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.   ROLL CALL Present: Joseph C. Winfield, Mayor Melanie Barrett, Vice-Mayor Tim Bohen, Councilmember Harry Greene, Councilmember Joyce Jones-Ivey, Councilmember Josh Nicolson, Councilmember Steve Solomon, Councilmember PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE    Mayor Winfield led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance.   UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS    Town Clerk Mike Standish announced the upcoming Town Meetings and the Oro Valley Path Forward Community Events.   MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS ON CURRENT EVENTS    Councilmember Jones-Ivey encouraged citizens to volunteer for Project Graduation and to participate in their workdays. Councilmember Greene reported that he attended the Sun City Vistoso Board Meeting as a guest, where he learned about all the exciting things happening there. Councilmember Greene also reported that the Davis-Monthan Air Force Base hosted the Heritage Flight Training Course which took place February 29 - March 3, 2024. Mayor Winfield reported that he and his wife had participated in the Move Across 2 Ranges event, 3/6/24 Minutes, Oro Valley Town Council Regular and Study Session 1 held on February 23, 2024. The event was held in partnership between the Town of Marana and Oro Valley Parks and Recreation. Mayor Winfield encouraged citizens to participate in the Oro Valley's 50th Anniversary Parade, to be held on Saturday, April 6, 2024.   TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT ON CURRENT EVENTS    Town Manager Jeff Wilkins reported that the 9-hole Pusch Ridge Golf Course remained open as a result of a solution from staff, Indigo Golf and others.   ORDER OF BUSINESS    Mayor Winfield reviewed the order of business and stated that the order would remain as posted.   INFORMATIONAL ITEMS    There were no informational items.   CALL TO AUDIENCE    Oro Valley resident Jack Arnold voiced his concerns regarding citizens utilizing his private property. Mayor Winfield requested that staff schedule a meeting with him, the Town Manager, and Mr. Arnold. Oro Valley resident Tim Tarris voiced his concerns regarding the proposed Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene project. Oro Valley resident Anthony Ferrara voiced his concerns regarding the proposed Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene project.   PRESENTATIONS   1.Proclamation - National Procurement Month       Mayor Winfield proclaimed the month of March 2024 as National Procurement Month. Chief Procurement Officer Cheri Odeski accepted the proclamation and provided a brief overview of the Town's procurement process.   CONSENT AGENDA   A.Minutes - February 16 and February 21, 2024      B.Final Plat approval of an 18-lot residential subdivision located on the east corner of Rancho Vistoso Blvd. and Morning Vista Drive (Case No. 2302435)       Motion by Mayor Joseph C. Winfield, seconded by Councilmember Harry Greene to approve 3/6/24 Minutes, Oro Valley Town Council Regular and Study Session 2  Motion by Mayor Joseph C. Winfield, seconded by Councilmember Harry Greene to approve Consent items (A) and (B).  Vote: 7 - 0 Carried   REGULAR AGENDA   1.RESOLUTION NO. (R)24-07, PROVIDING NOTICE OF INTENT TO INCREASE THE POTABLE WATER BASE RATES, INCREASE THE POTABLE WATER COMMODITY RATES AND INCREASE THE POTABLE GROUNDWATER PRESERVATION FEE FOR THE ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY       Water Utility Director Peter Abraham presented item #1 and included the following: Notice of Intent to increase water rates Rate Drives Proposed Potable Water Rates and Fees Potable Water Cost Comparisons Schedule Discussion ensued amongst Council and staff regarding item #1.    Motion by Mayor Joseph C. Winfield, seconded by Vice-Mayor Melanie Barrett to approve Resolution No. (R)24-07, providing notice of intent to increase the potable water base rates, increase the potable water commodity rates and increase potable groundwater preservation fee for the Oro Valley Water Utility. Discussion continued amongst Council and staff regarding item #1.    Motion by Mayor Joseph C. Winfield, seconded by Vice-Mayor Melanie Barrett to approve Resolution No. (R)24-07, providing notice of intent to increase the potable water base rates, increase the potable water commodity rates and increase potable groundwater preservation fee for the Oro Valley Water Utility.  Vote: 7 - 0 Carried   2.DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THE VISTOSO TRAILS NATURE PRESERVE       Vice Mayor Barrett introduced the item and explained the reason it was requested. Vice Mayor Barrett also included the following: Romspen Rezoning Proposal 2018 Timeline 2019 Timeline 2020 Timeline 2021 Timeline 2022 Timeline 2023 Timeline 2024 Timeline Town Council Motions Survey Results Current Proposed Budget The following individuals spoke in support of item #2. 3/6/24 Minutes, Oro Valley Town Council Regular and Study Session 3 Oro Valley resident Shirl Lamonna Oro Valley resident Joseph Affiniti Oro Valley resident Tom Breadon Oro Valley resident Marcia Sieben Oro Valley resident Bill O'Donnell Oro Valley resident Tom Stegman Oro Valley resident Matt Wood Oro Valley resident Gerald Bren Oro Valley resident Rosa Dailey Oro Valley resident Phil Zielinski Oro Valley resident Patricia Sturmon Oro Valley resident Charles Stack Oro Valley resident Terry Hart Oro Valley resident Mark Enzor Oro Valley resident Joe Bell Oro Valley resident Bruce Baier Oro Valley resident Richard Beam John Welch, of Archeology Southwest, spoke regarding the Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve. Councilmember Nicolson explained the reason he requested the item.    Motion by Councilmember Josh Nicolson, seconded by Vice-Mayor Melanie Barrett to allocate $2,000,000 in the fiscal year 2024/2025 budget, for the re-vegetation of the Vistoso Nature Trails Preserve grounds and beautification of the pond area. In addition, we should pursue grant funding to supplement this allocation. Discussion ensued amongst Council and staff regarding the Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve.    Motion by Councilmember Josh Nicolson, seconded by Vice-Mayor Melanie Barrett to allocate $2,000,000 in the fiscal year 2024/2025 budget, for the re-vegetation of the Vistoso Nature Trails Preserve grounds and beautification of the pond area. In addition, we should pursue grant funding to supplement this allocation.  Vote: 7 - 0 Carried    Mayor Winfield recessed the meeting at 8:14 p.m. Mayor Winfield reconvened the meeting at 8:27 p.m.   FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS    No future agenda items were requested.   ADJOURNMENT OF THE REGULAR SESSION   STUDY SESSION   CALL TO ORDER    Mayor Winfield called the study session to order at 8:28 p.m.   3/6/24 Minutes, Oro Valley Town Council Regular and Study Session 4 STUDY SESSION AGENDA   1.PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION REGARDING A POTENTIAL ZONING CODE AMENDMENT REGARDING VEHICLE STORAGE FACILITIES       Planner Alex Chavez presented Study Session item #1 and included the following: Purpose Key Zoning Code Definitions Vehicle Storage Facilities Existing Code Research Potential Amendments Potential Code Amendments Discussion and Feedback Discussion ensued amongst Council and staff regarding the potential zoning code amendment regarding vehicle storage facilities. Council provided feedback and guidance to staff regarding the potential zoning code amendment regarding vehicle storage facilities. Council requested that Town Attorney Nathan Rosthchild provide the Council with a legal analysis concerning what other municipalities had done with regard to changing requirements as it relates to land use.   ADJOURNMENT    Mayor Winfield adjourned the meeting at 9:00 p.m.     _________________________________________ Michelle Stine, MMC Deputy Town Clerk I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the regular and study session of the Town of Oro Valley Council of Oro Valley, Arizona held on the 6th day of March 2024. I further certify that the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present. _________________________________________ Mike Standish, CMC Town Clerk 3/6/24 Minutes, Oro Valley Town Council Regular and Study Session 5    Town Council Regular Session 2. Meeting Date:03/20/2024   Requested by: Bayer Vella, Community and Economic Development  Submitted By:Michael Spaeth, Community and Economic Development Case Number:2301138 SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING FOUR ITEMS RELATED TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF 132 MULTIFAMILY UNITS ON AN APPROXIMATELY 8.7-ACRE SITE LOCATED ON VISTOSO HIGHLANDS DRIVE, APPROXIMATELY 1/4-MILE WEST OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD ON THE GOLF COURSE OLD CLUBHOUSE SITE. THE APPLICATIONS INCLUDE:    ITEM A: ORDINANCE NO. (O)24-04: REZONING (PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT) OF APPROXIMATELY 0.7 ACRES FROM OPEN SPACE TO RECREATION /GOLF COURSE AND TO RELOCATE A PLANNED TRAIL TO ADJACENT TOWN PROPERTY ITEM B: DEVELOPMENT AND LANDSCAPE PLANS ITEM C: AMENDED EASEMENT AGREEMENT ITEM D: ARCHITECTURE RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends conditional approval of: Item A subject to the conditions listed in Attachment 1 - Exhibit B; conditional approval of Item B subject to the conditions in Attachment 2 - Item B; and approval of Item D. Item C is a Town Council consideration only item, and staff recommends approval subject to the conditions listed in Attachment 2 - Item C. Items B, C and D are dependent on prior approval of Item A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The purpose of this item is to consider  four applications related to the proposed development of 132 multifamily units on an approximately 8.7-acre site located south of Vistoso Highlands Drive, approximately 1/4-mile west of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and the site of the former Golf Club at Vistoso clubhouse site shown in yellow in graphic at right. The applications include:    Item A: Ordinance No. (O)24-04, Rezoning (PAD Amendment) of approximately 0.7 acres from Open Space to Recreation/Golf Course and to relocate a planned trail to adjacent Town property (Attachment 2) Item B: Development and Landscape Plans (Attachments 3 and 4) Item C: Amended Easement Agreement (Attachment 5) Item D: Architecture (Attachment 6)    The majority of the site was zoned High Density Residential (HDR) in 1987 when Rancho Vistoso was originally planned. The HDR zoning district permits apartments slightly in excess of the density and building heights proposed.  The subject properties were part of the Settlement Agreement (the "Agreement") that formed the Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve in 2022 between the Town, the original property owner (Romspen), The Conservation Fund, and the current property owner (Oro Valley 132, LLC). The Agreement reflects the development rights in the existing HDR zoning as established in 1987 and the property right to build up to 132 apartments. Additional detail is provided in the "Background or Detailed Information" section of this report. Staff have been working with Archeology Southwest (the new easement holder, previously the Conservation Fund) as a close partner throughout this process on all components of this application request. Furthermore, care has been taken to include conditions regarding a new public parking trail head and a proposed cart/trail relocation to alleviate any disruptions to preserve public access during and after construction. APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL The applicant's site design (shown at right) includes:  132 multifamily units Max building height: 32 feet/2 stories (includes parapet walls to screen rooftop mechanical equipment). Code allows 34 feet/3 stories. 2 access points Recreational amenities  Clubhouse facility Pool Dog park Tot-lot area Trail connections to Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve The relocation of a planned trail from the area in blue onto adjacent Town property shown in orange ITEM A - REZONING (ATTACHMENT 2) Item A is a proposed rezoning for ONLY the western 0.69-acre parcel (shown in blue in graphic above). The request includes two elements:  Changing the zoning from Open Space to Recreation/Golf Course to enable development of parking, refuse, and recreation facilities associated with the applicant's development, which are permitted in the Recreation/Golf Course zoning district. No apartment buildings are proposed within the rezoning boundary. 1. Relocate a planned trail onto the adjacent Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve property (new location shown in orange in graphic above at left hand side of image). 2. Part of the "Agreement" was a spoken commitment from the applicant to construct a parking lot for the adjacent Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve. A condition has been included in Attachment 1 - Item A to require development of this public amenity that will be open to all users of the Preserve. The condition requires a financial commitment from the applicant (not to exceed $50,000), with the remainder to be funded by recreational impact fees generated by this project. Construction of a new public parking area and relocating the cart path trail along the southern border are significant improvements impacting users of the Preserve. A primary goal is to ensure there are no disruptions to Preserve users during construction. Several additional conditions have been included in Attachment 1 to ensure this goal is achieved by:  Keeping the existing parking lot open until a temporary Preserve parking lot is constructed.1. Installing a new and fully improved Preserve trail maintaining user access, prior to the existing trail being demolished. 2. Constructing the permanent Preserve parking lot prior to the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy for the apartments. 3. GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE All rezoning applications are reviewed for conformance with the General Plan Land Use Map, Vision, Guiding Principles, and Goals and Policies. The subject property is designated as Open Space on the General Plan Land Use Map. Both the existing zoning (Open Space) and the proposed zoning (Recreation/Golf Course) are consistent with the Open Space designation as shown in the Land Use Designations and Zoning table on page 49 of the Your Voice, Our Future General Plan. The applicant's proposal is to develop only parking, refuse, and recreation facilities within the rezoning area, no apartments, to accommodate the adjacent, entitled multifamily proposal. The applicant's proposal is in conformance with the Your Voice, Our Future General Plan. Additional detail regarding the request's conformance is provided in the "Background and Detailed Information" section of this report. ZONING CODE CONFORMANCE Rezoning (Planned Area Development amendment) requests are also reviewed for conformance with the applicable PAD (in this case the Rancho Vistoso PAD), specifically the development standards of the proposed zoning district, and any applicable standards of the Town of Oro Valley Zoning Code. The applicant is requesting a rezoning of the property from Rancho Vistoso Open Space to Rancho Vistoso Recreation/Golf Course, the same district as the adjacent Preserve. The Tentative Development Plan (Attachment 7 and at right) conforms to the Recreation/Golf Course zoning district by limiting uses within the zoning area to only parking, refuse, and recreation facilities. Though the PAD does not specifically establish permitted uses for the Recreation/Golf Course zoning district, the proposed uses are consistent with those typically found in the Recreation/Golf Course zoning district elsewhere in the PAD. Prior approvals in this district functionally serve as an interpretation of what is permitted. The applicant's request is in conformance with the Town's Parks and Open Space (POS) development standards - the Town's most equivalent zoning district. The planned trail within the rezoning boundary is proposed to be moved to the adjacent Preserve connecting existing trails in the Preserve to the sidewalk along Vistoso Highlands Drive (shown in orange in graphic above). A condition has been included in Attachment 1 - Item A to require installation of the trail prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the apartments. The request is in conformance with the PAD and applicable Zoning Code standards. ITEM B- DEVELOPMENT AND LANDSCAPE PLANS (ATTACHMENTS 3 AND 4)  This item includes the applicant's Development and Landscape Plans for the proposed development. The site design (shown below) includes:  132 multifamily units Maximum building height of 32 feet/2 stories 2 access points off Vistoso Highlands Drive Recreational amenities Trail connections The applicant's site design involves three components, including:  The "clubhouse property" zoned High Density Residential (outlined in red) where 1. multifamily units are already entitled as a permitted use. Note, this is the only portion of the property where multifamily units are proposed. The "rezoning property" (outlined in blue) discussed in Item A, where parking, refuse, and recreational facilities are proposed. The trail (shown in orange) is proposed to be moved onto Town property within the preserve. 2. The "expansion or easement property" (outlined in yellow) where only parking and drainage facilities associated with the proposed development are proposed. The "Agreement" enabled use of "approximately 1.5 acres" of land within the Preserve for parking and drainage, while the current design proposes use of approximately 1.89 acres. As proposed, the extent of paved/impervious surfaces is approximately 1.36 acres with the remainder revegetated drainage basins (approximately 0.53 acres). A condition has been included in Attachment 1 - Item B to revise the site plan to reduce encroachment to 1.5 acres.  3. Several minor conditions have been included in Attachment 1 - Item B to address remaining relatively technical items. With these conditions, the proposed plans are consistent with the Rancho Vistoso PAD and all applicable Zoning Code requirements. ITEM C - AMENDMENT TO THE EASEMENT AGREEMENT (ATTACHMENT 5) This item is an amendment to the current "Easement Agreement" to reflect the extent of encroachment into the Easement Area in the development plan (Item B). The current agreement requires:  "...parties agree to execute and record an amendment to this Easement Agreement after development plans are finalized, which amendment will more precisely identify the legal description and nature of the use of the Easement Area"   The proposed amendment aims to satisfy the stipulation above. While a preliminary easement has been included in Attachment 5, it reflects the applicants current development plan design which includes approximately 1.89 acres of encroachment into the Easement Area. Conditions have been included in Attachment 1 - Item C, to 1) reduce the encroachment to 1.5 acres to reflect the Development Plan condition in Item B and 2) to provide a revised legal description and survey to reflect the final extent of encroachment into the Easement Area, subject to Planning and Zoning Administrator and Town Engineer approval.  Staff has coordinated with Archaeology Southwest (the current easement holder, formerly The Conservation Fund) on the proposed amendment. As the easement holder, they have expressed conceptual support for the agreement included in Attachment 5 and have offered the following: "Archaeology Southwest (ASW) is committed to a long-term collaborative relationship with TOV to steward the Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve (VTNP). ASW takes no position on either the specific meaning of “approximately 1.5 acres” or on the need on the part of the OV 132 for land in excess of 1.5 acres to complete the 132-unit development. ASW has participated in a suite of meetings with OV 132 engineers and landscape architects to improve our understanding of the proposed alterations to the land in excess of 1.5 acres. ASW finds that the proposed drainage basins and landscaping are a good way to establish an ecological and visual buffer between VTNP and the OV 132 development. Compared to an alternative in which the OV 132 development is restricted to 1.5 acres, the proposal is more likely to complement the VTNP and to serve the human and wildlife users of the VTNP. OV 132 construction should not commence until there is a specific agreement between TOV and OV 132 to provide uninterrupted paved or all-weather trail use and parking for VTNP users. As the inheritor from The Conservation Fund of all duties and interests linked to the VTNP, ASW understands that there may be a need to execute an amendment to the July 2022 Easement Agreement, per Paragraph 2 of that agreement, to “more precisely identify the legal description and nature of the use of the Easement.” ASW agrees in principle with the draft of the proposed amendment circulated to the parties by OV 132. ASW further agrees to participate in negotiations to finalize and execute the amendment following action on this matter by TOV Council. " ITEM D - ARCHITECTURE (ATTACHMENT 6) This item includes the applicant's architecture (shown below) for the proposed development. The design incorporates the following: Four-sided architecture A mix of desert colors, textures and materials Varied roof and wall planes Parapet walls to screen rooftop mechanical equipment All accessory buildings (e.g. clubhouse, maintenance building, refuse enclosures, etc.) will utilize the same architectural design aesthetic. The design was approved by the Vistoso Community Association late last month and meets all Rancho Vistoso PAD and applicable Zoning Code standards. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION The public participation process for the applicant's project has been extensive. An informational video was posted on www.OVprojects.com  and two neighborhood meetings were held. Both meetings were well attended with in-depth discussions regarding the applicant's project. Conversations focused on:  Apartments Traffic Neighborhood Compatibility One of the more frequent discussion topics was existing construction traffic in the area using the Vistoso Highlands gate (the back gate) to enter Stone Canyon. Though the applicant's project has no bearing on this existing situation, the Town Engineer has worked with adjacent Home Owners Associations to address the issue moving forward. As of February 1, no vehicles are allowed to "stop, stand, or park" on the street shoulder during the hours of 5am to 9am. Summaries of the meetings are provided in Attachment 8. Staff have received additional correspondence regarding the project which has been provided in Attachment 9. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION The Planning and Zoning Commission considered the property owners' applications during a public hearing on February 6, 2024. The meeting was well attended by neighbors with detailed discussions regarding the proposal. The primary topics discussed include:  Apartments Density Neighborhood Compatibility Traffic The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended conditional approval of Item A, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1 - Item A, conditional approval of Item B, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1 - Item B and approval of Item C. After the Commission meeting, staff worked with Archeology Southwest and the applicant to strengthen all timing conditions associated with Preserve improvements (new public trailhead parking area and relocation of cart path/trail along the southern boundary). The objective is to ensure no lapse in public access during construction. BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: The applicant's proposal (shown at right) to The applicant's proposal (shown at right) to develop  132 multifamily units requires the following applications:    Item A: Ordinance No. (O) 24 -04, Rezoning (PAD Amendment) of approximately 0.7 acres from Open Space to Recreation/Golf Course and relocate an existing trail to Town property Item B: Development and Landscape Plans Item C: Amended Easement Agreement Item D: Architecture SITE HISTORY  1987: Annexed into the Town as part of the original Rancho Vistoso PAD. Established High Density Residential (HDR) zoning on apartment parcel 1994: Golf Club at Vistoso established 2019: Golf Club at Vistoso closed 2021: Part of the agreement/formation of the Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve between the Town, Romspen, The Conservation Fund, and the applicant (Oro Valley 132, LLC) BACKGROUND The majority of the site was zoned High Density Residential (HDR) when Rancho Vistoso was first planned in 1987. The HDR zoning district permits apartments in excess of the density proposed in the applicant's request. The subject properties were part of the "Agreement" that was necessary to effectuate the final sale of the golf course property to establish the Preserve. As part of that agreement, the following elements were key:  Restrict construction to a maximum of 132 multifamily units on the "clubhouse parcel" (HDR permits 133 units based on property size and the PAD standard allowing minimum gross land area of 2,000 square feet per unit) Reduce building heights permitted to a maximum of 2 stories (existing HDR zoning permits up to 3 stories) Use of "approximately 1.5 acres" of Vistoso Preserve property for parking and drainage facilities. Flexibility with regard to zoning standards (no variances have been requested as part of this application) Lastly, as part of the discussions, a verbal commitment was made by the applicant (Oro Valley 132, LLC) to construct a trailhead for the Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve. The design of the parking lot trailhead has not been finalized, but a condition has been included in Attachment 1 - Item A requiring final completion of construction concurrent with the apartments, including a temporary parking lot opened prior to closure of the existing one - to ensure Preserve users can continue to access the park. APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL The applicant's site design (shown at right) includes:  132 multifamily units Max building height 32 feet/2 stories (code allows 34 feet/3 stories) 2 access points Recreational amenities  Clubhouse facility Pool Dog park Tot-lot area Trail connections to Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve Relocate planned trail onto adjacent Town property within the Preserve (shown in orange) ITEM A - REZONING (ATTACHMENT 2) This item is a proposed rezoning from Open Space to Recreation/Golf Course for ONLY the western 0.69-acre parcel (outlined in red in graphic below) and to relocate a planned trail onto adjacent Town property within the preserve.    The request is to change the zoning to enable development of parking, refuse, and recreation facilities associated with the applicant's site design which conforms to the Recreation/Golf Course zoning district. No apartment buildings are proposed within the rezoning boundary. The request also includes a proposal to relocate a planned trail onto adjacent Town property within the Preserve. A condition has been included in Attachment 1 - Item A to require installation of the trail and development of a parking lot/trailhead within the Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve that will be open to the public and users of the Preserve. Construction of a new public parking/trailhead area and relocating the cart path trail along the southern border are significant improvements impacting users of the Preserve. A primary goal is to ensure there are no disruptions to Preserve users during construction. Several additional conditions have been included in Attachment 1 to ensure this goal is achieved by:  Keeping the existing parking lot open until a temporary Preserve parking lot is constructed.1. Installing a new and fully improved Preserve trail maintaining user access, prior to the existing trail being demolished. 2. Constructing the permanent Preserve parking lot prior to the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy for the apartments. 3. GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE All rezoning applications are reviewed for conformance with the General Plan Land Use Map, Vision, Guiding Principles, and Goals and Policies. The following section provides analysis relative to the consistency of the rezoning request with the General Plan Land Use Map, Vision and key Goals and Policies. Land Use Map The subject property is designated as Open Space on the General Plan Land Use Map. This designation is defined as: This land use designation represents areas that are natural open space that have been preserved through zoning, conservation easements or public ownership. Both the existing (Open Space) and proposed (Recreational/Golf Course) zoning districts are permitted within the Open Space land use designation (see Land Use Designations and Zoning table on page 49 of the General Plan).  Vision The General Plan Vision states: Oro Valley strives to be a well-managed community that provides all residents with opportunities for quality living. Oro Valley will keep its friendly, small-town, neighborly character, while increasing services, employment and recreation. The Town's lifestyle continues to be defined by a strong sense of community, high regard for public safety and an extraordinary natural environment and scenic views. Goals and Policies The proposal is consistent with several General Plan Goals and Policies. Of the 87 goals and policies analyzed, 3 were applicable. The following are noteworthy:  A community with a wide range of services, amenities, shopping and dining opportunities and housing types that meet the needs of current and future residents (Community Goal D) Effective transitions between differing land uses and intensities in the community (Development Goal X). Support the development of diverse housing types within the community (Complete Community Policy CC.7) Provide diverse land uses that meet the Town's overall needs and effectively transition in scale and density adjacent to neighborhoods (Land Use Policy LU.5) The subject property is designated as Open Space on the General Plan Land Use Map. Both the existing zoning (Open Space) and the proposed zoning (Recreation/Golf Course) are consistent with the General Plan Open Space Land Use category. The applicant's proposal is to develop only parking, refuse, and recreation facilities within the rezoning area (no apartments) to accommodate the adjacent, entitled multifamily proposal. The applicant's proposal is in conformance with the Your Voice, Our Future General Plan. ZONING CODE CONFORMANCE Planned Area Development (PAD) Amendment (rezoning) requests are also reviewed for conformance with the applicable PAD (in this case the Rancho Vistoso PAD), specifically the development standards of the proposed zoning district, and any applicable standards of the Town of Oro Valley Zoning Code. The applicant is requesting a rezone of the property from Rancho Vistoso Open Space to Rancho Vistoso Recreation/Golf Course, the same as the adjacent Preserve. The planned trail within the rezoning boundary is proposed to be moved to the adjacent Preserve connecting existing trails in the Preserve to the sidewalk along Vistoso Highlands Drive (shown in orange in graphic at right). A condition has been included in Attachment 1 - Item A to require installation of the trail prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the apartments.  A condition has also been included to require installation of a new, fully improved trail along the southern border to replace the existing cart path that is being removed to maintain connectivity within the Preserve. This must occur, per the proposed conditions, prior to demolition of the existing path. The Tentative Development Plan (Attachment 7 and at right) conforms to the Recreation/Golf Course zoning district by limiting uses within the zoning area to only parking, refuse, and recreation facilities. Though the PAD does not specifically establish permitted uses for the Recreation/Golf Course zoning district, the proposed uses are consistent with those typically found in the Recreation/Golf Course zoning district elsewhere in the PAD. Prior approvals in this district functionally serve as an interpretation of what is permitted. The applicant's request is in conformance with the Town's Parks and Open Space (POS) development standards - the Town's most equivalent zoning district. ITEM B- DEVELOPMENT AND LANDSCAPE PLANS (ATTACHMENT 3 AND 4)  ITEM B- DEVELOPMENT AND LANDSCAPE PLANS (ATTACHMENT 3 AND 4)  This item includes the applicant's Development and Landscape Plans for the proposed development. The applicant's site design (shown at right) includes:  132 multifamily units Max building height 32 feet/2 stories (code allows 34 feet/3 stories) 2 access points Recreational amenities  Clubhouse facility Pool Dog park Tot-lot area Trail connections to Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve Relocate an existing trail onto Town property within the Preserve (shown in orange) The applicant's site design includes three components (depicted in graphic above), including:  The "clubhouse property" zoned High Density Residential (outlined in red) where multifamily units are entitled as a permitted use. Note, this is the only property where multifamily units are proposed. 1. The "rezoning property" (outlined in blue) discussed in Item A where parking, refuse, and recreational facilities are proposed. 2. The "expansion or easement property" (outlined in yellow above) where only parking and drainage facilities associated with the proposed development are proposed. The Agreement enabled use of approximately 1.5 acres of land within the Preserve for parking and drainage facilities associated with the applicant's development. 3. The current design (shown at right) proposes to use approximately 1.89 acres of Town land within the Preserve. The design includes approximately 1.36 acres of paved/impervious surfaces and the remainder (0.53 acres) as revegetated drainage basins. Per the applicant, the basins provide water harvesting, heavily vegetated habitat and a visual buffer to the parking lot. A condition has been included in Attachment 1 - Item B to revise the site plan to reflect the 1.5 acre requirement.  The following development standards are notable for this proposal: Building Heights: The HDR zoning district allows a maximum building height of 34 feet/3 stories. The applicant is proposing all buildings be limited to two-story structures with a maximum building height of 32 feet. There is a mix of 1 and 2-story buildings along Vistoso Highlands Road, so the applicant's proposal is consistent with the area. Neighborhood Compatibility: Though immediate homes are single-story, the applicant's proposed design is consistent with other two-story developments along Vistoso Highlands Drive further east toward Rancho Vistoso Boulevard. While there are no multifamily units in the area, apartments are entitled as a permitted use in the existing High Density Residential (HDR) zoning district. Pedestrian Connectivity: The applicant's design includes both on-site and off-site pedestrian connections. All rental units are connected to parking areas, the leasing office and all recreational amenities. Lastly, there are connections to the adjacent Preserve and connections to the larger pedestrian circulation network in the area. Access/Circulation: The applicant's proposed design includes two access points via Vistoso Highlands Drive. The site design includes all required buffer yards and incorporates drought-tolerant, Sonoran Desert plants. Several minor conditions have been included in Attachment 1 - Item B to address remaining relatively minor technical items. With these conditions, the proposed plans are consistent with the Rancho Vistoso PAD and all applicable Zoning Code requirements.  ITEM C - AMENDED EASEMENT AGREEMENT (ATTACHMENT 5) The purpose of this item is to amend the current "Easement Agreement" to reflect the final extent of encroachment into the "Easement Area" as part of the applicant's development plan. The current agreement includes the following:    "...parties agree to execute and record an amendment to this Easement Agreement after development plans are finalized, which amendment will more precisely identify the legal description and nature of the use of the Easement Area" The proposed amendment aims to satisfy the stipulation above. While a preliminary easement has been included in Attachment 5, it reflects the applicant's current development plan design which includes approximately 1.89 acres of encroachment into the Easement Area. Conditions have been included in Attachment 1 - Item C, #1) reduce the encroachment to 1.5 acres to reflect the Development Plan condition in Item B and 2) to provide a revised legal description and survey to reflect the final extent of encroachment into the Easement Area, subject to Planning and Zoning Administrator and Town Engineer approval. If the Development Plan is approved to reflect a cap of 1.5 acres in area, the agreement will need to be amended accordingly. Staff has coordinated with Archeology Southwest (the current easement holder, formerly The Conservation Fund) on the proposed amendment. They have offered the following:    "Archaeology Southwest (ASW) is committed to a long-term collaborative relationship with TOV to steward the Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve (VTNP). ASW takes no position on either the specific meaning of “approximately 1.5 acres” or on the need on the part of the OV 132 for land in excess of 1.5 acres to complete the 132-unit development. ASW has participated in a suite of meetings with OV 132 engineers and landscape architects to improve our understanding of the proposed alterations to the land in excess of 1.5 acres. ASW finds that the proposed drainage basins and landscaping are a good way to establish an ecological and visual buffer between VTNP and the OV 132 development. Compared to an alternative in which the OV 132 development is restricted to 1.5 acres, the proposal is more likely to complement the VTNP and to serve the human and wildlife users of the VTNP. OV 132 construction should not commence until there is a specific agreement between TOV and OV 132 to provide uninterrupted paved or all-weather trail use and parking for VTNP users. As the inheritor from The Conservation Fund of all duties and interests linked to the VTNP, ASW understands that there may be a need to execute an amendment to the July 2022 Easement Agreement, per Paragraph 2 of that agreement, to “more precisely identify the legal description and nature of the use of the Easement.” ASW agrees in principle with the draft of the proposed amendment circulated to the parties by OV 132. ASW further agrees to participate in negotiations to finalize and execute the amendment following action on this matter by TOV Council. " A condition has been included in Attachment 1 - Item B to require construction of the all-weather access trail prior to demolition of the current trail. ITEM D - ARCHITECTURE (ATTACHMENT 6) This item includes the applicant's architecture for the proposed development. The design (shown below) incorporates the following: Four-sided architecture A mix of desert colors, textures and materials Varied roof and wall planes Parapet walls to screen rooftop mechanical equipment All accessory buildings (e.g. clubhouse, maintenance building, refuse enclosures, etc.) will utilize the same architectural design aesthetic. These applications are reviewed for conformance with the Rancho Vistoso PAD and all applicable Design Principles and Standards of the Zoning Code. A summary of the applications' conformance with each is provided below. RANCHO VISTOSO PAD ANALYSIS The applicant's request includes desert southwest colors and materials utilizing shades of earth tones, roof tiles, stucco, wood accents and stone. The proposed architecture is consistent with the requirements of the Rancho Vistoso PAD and has been reviewed and approved by the Vistoso Community Association. ZONING CODE ANALYSIS Design Principles Architecture applications are reviewed for conformance with the Design Principles of the Zoning Code. The Design Principles are listed below in italics, followed by staff commentary. Building Design shall be appropriate for the climate and characteristics of the Sonoran Desert, including indigenous and traditional textures, colors, and shapes found in and around Oro Valley. All development shall maintain and strengthen the high quality of design exemplified in Oro Valley through project creativity and design excellence. The applicant's proposed architecture incorporates colors and materials common to the Sonoran Desert, including earth-tone colors, stucco, clay roof tiles, wood accents and stone. The request is consistent with this design principle. Building scale, height and mass shall be consistent with the Town-approved intensity of the site, designated scenic corridors, and valued mountain views. Buildings, shall be designed to respect the scale of adjoining areas and should mitigate the negative and functional impacts that arise from scale, bulk and mass. Per the "Agreement", the multifamily units are limited to 32 feet/two-stories (less than the entitled 34 feet/3 stories of the High Density Residential zoning district). While a majority of the surrounding development is single-story, there are two-story developments east on Vistoso Highlands Drive. The site design is broken up into 7 buildings which include roof and wall plane variations to help break up the massing of each structure. The request is consistent with this design principle. All building facades shall be fully articulated, including variation in building massing, roof planes, wall planes, and surface articulation. Architectural elements including, but not limited to overhangs, trellis, projections, awnings, insets, material, and texture shall be used to create visual interest that contributes to a building's character. The buildings include appropriate roof and wall plane variations to help break up the massing of each structure. All windows are inset to decrease solar impacts on the units. A variety of colors and textures are used to fully articulate all four sides of the design. The request is consistent with this design principle. Building design and screening strategies shall be implemented to conceal the view of loading areas, refuse enclosures, mechanical equipment, appurtenances, and utilities from adjacent public streets and neighborhoods. All refuse areas will include the code-required self-closing gates and walls to ensure they are fully screened from public view. All mechanical equipment, whether roof or ground mounted, will be required to be fully screened from view. The request is consistent with this design principle. Design Standards The architecture was also reviewed for conformance with the Design Standards of the Zoning Code. Several key applicable standards are listed below:  Consider the design of all sides of a building ("four sided architecture") Accessory structures...shall reflect the character of the...development theme. Accessory structures...shall reflect the character of the...development theme. Substantial materials, including stucco, brick, adobe, natural stone, textured concrete...shall predominate. The applicant's architectural theme incorporates materials, colors and textures common to the Sonoran Desert and consistent with surrounding architectural styles. Overall, the applicant's request is generally consistent with the Design Standards of the Zoning Code. The applicant's architecture has been approved by the Vistoso Community Association and meets all Rancho Vistoso PAD and applicable Zoning Code standards. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Notices were sent for the Public Hearings as follows:  Notices to all property owners within 1000 feet (distance increased in some areas to ensure entire subdivisions were notified) Notification to additional interested parties who asked to be added during the neighborhood meeting process Homeowners Association mailings Advertisement in The Daily Territorial newspaper Postings on the property Posting at Town Hall and on the Town website An informational video was posted on www.OVprojects.com  and two neighborhood meetings were held. The meetings were well attended with in-depth discussions regarding the applicant's proposal. One of the more frequent discussion topics was existing construction traffic in the area using the Vistoso Highlands gate (the back gate) to enter Stone Canyon. Though the applicant's project has no bearing on this existing situation, the Town Engineer has worked with adjacent Homeowners Associations to address the issue moving forward. Starting February 1, signage was erected indicating that vehicles may not "stop, stand, or park" along the street shoulder during the hours of 5am to 9am. OVPD will have the authority to enforce this provision. Summaries of each meeting are provided in Attachment 8. Staff have received additional neighbor correspondence which has been provided in Attachment 9. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION The Planning and Zoning Commission considered the property owners' applications during a public hearing on February 6, 2024. The meeting was well attended by neighbors with detailed discussions regarding the proposal. The primary topics discussed include:  Apartments Density Neighborhood Compatibility Traffic The applicant's design includes apartments ONLY within the High Density Residential (HDR) zoned property where they are already permitted. Additionally, the proposed density is compliant with the minimum gross land area per dwelling unit of the HDR zoning district (2,000 sq. ft./unit). The Staff report and draft meeting minutes are included as Attachments 10 and 11, respectively. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION The applicant intends to develop 132 two-story apartment units. To accommodate this design, the applicant is proposing the following:    Item A: Rezoning for a portion of the subject property (~0.69 acres) from Open Space to Recreation/Golf Course and to relocate a planned trail to adjacent Town property. Item B: Development and Landscape Plans for the development Item C: Amended Easement Agreement Item D: Architecture Several key aspects of the applicant's request include:  Conditions have been included to strengthen the timing associated with improvements to the Preserve parking lot and trail with the aim to minimize any disruption of public access to the Preserve during construction. 1. The old clubhouse site (where apartments are proposed) has been zoned High Density Residential (HDR), which entitles multifamily as a permitted use, since Rancho Vistoso was first planned in 1987. 2. The properties were part of the Settlement Agreement (the "Agreement") that formed the Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve.  Stipulations were included that recognized the applicants (Oro Valley 132, LLC) existing property right to construct up to 132 apartments and use of approximately 1.5 acres of Preserve land for parking and drainage purposes associated with the development. i. The applicant has agreed to construct a trail head parking lot (approximately 21 spaces) within the adjacent Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve at no cost to the Town (condition included in Attachment 1 - Item A). ii. 3. Development within the rezoning boundary for Item A includes only parking, refuse, and recreational facilities, consistent with the proposed zoning district of Recreation/Golf Course. 4. The rezoning also includes a proposal to relocate a planned trail onto adjacent Town property in the Preserve. 5. The Development and Landscape Plan, with the conditions listed in Attachment 1 - Item B, and Architecture are consistent with the Rancho Vistoso PAD and all applicable Zoning Code requirements. 6. A condition has been included in Attachment 1 - Item B (Development and Landscape Plans) to revise the site design to limit encroachment into Town property to 1.5 acres for parking and drainage facilities.  7. The applicant's proposed design has been approved by the Vistoso Community Association.8. The Planning and Zoning Commission have recommended conditional approval of the applicant's requests. 9. Further note: Staff worked with Archeology Southwest (the new easement holder) as a close partner throughout the process on all aspects of the application. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends  Conditional approval of Item A, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1 - Item A Conditional approval of Item B, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1 - Item B Approval of Item D After the Commission meeting, staff worked with Archeology Southwest and the applicant to strengthen all timing conditions associated with Preserve improvements (new public trail head parking area and relocation of the cart path/trail along the southern boundary). The objective is to ensure no lapse in public access during construction. Item C is a Town Council consideration only item and staff recommends approval, subject to the conditions listed in Attachment 1 - Item C. Items B, C, and D are dependent on prior approval of Item A. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A SUGGESTED MOTION: Town Council may wish to consider one of the following motions: ITEM A - REZONING I MOVE to CONDITIONALLY APPROVE Ordinance No. (O)24-04, the proposed rezoning from Open Space to Recreation/Golf Course, subject to the conditions listed in Attachment 1 - Item A, based on a finding the request is in conformance with the General Plan and Rancho Vistoso PAD. OR I MOVE to DENY Ordinance No. (O)24-04, the proposed rezoning based on a finding that ______________________________. ITEM B - DEVELOPMENT AND LANDSCAPE PLAN I MOVE to CONDITIONALLY APPROVE, subject to the conditions listed in Attachment 1 - Item B, the proposed Development and Landscape Plans based on a finding the requests are in conformance with the Rancho Vistoso PAD and all applicable Zoning Code requirements. OR I MOVE to DENY the proposed Development and Landscape Plan based on a finding that ______________________. ITEM C - AMENDED EASEMENT AGREEMENT I MOVE to CONDITIONALLY APPROVE the proposed amendment to the Easement Agreement, subject to the conditions listed in Attachment 1 - Item C, based on a finding it is in conformance with the all applicable Town Code requirements. OR I MOVE to DENY the proposed amendment to the Easement Agreement based on a finding that ____________________. ITEM D - ARCHITECTURE I MOVE to APPROVE the proposed Architecture based on a finding the request is in conformance with the Rancho Vistoso PAD and all applicable Zoning Code requirements. OR I MOVE to DENY the proposed Architecture based on a finding that ________________________. Attachments ATTACHMENT 1 - CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL_FINAL_v2  ATTACHMENT 2 - ORDINANCE NO. (O)24-04 -, REZONING FOR PARCEL 219-19-1840 AND APPLICANTS SITE ANALYSIS 4  ATTACHMENT 3 - APPLICANT'S DEVELOPMENT PLAN SET 2  ATTACHMENT 4 - APPLICANT'S LANDSCAPE PLAN SET.2  ATTACHMENT 5 - OV 132 EASEMENT AMENDMENT DRAFT  ATTACHMENT 6 - APPLICANT'S ARCHITECTURE SET  ATTACHMENT 7 - APPLICANT'S TENTATIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN.2  ATTACHMENT 8 - NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING SUMMARIES  ATTACHMENT 9 - ADDITIONAL NEIGHBOR CORRESPONDENCE  ATTACHMENT 10 - FEB 6, 2024 PZC STAFF RERPORT  ATTACHMENT 11 - FEB 6, 2024 PZC MEETING MINUTES  Staff Presentation  Southwest intersection of Vistoso Highlands Attachment 1 – Conditions of Approval Item A – Rezoning (2301138) 1. In order to minimize the time during which public access to the Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve (“Preserve”) is interrupted, applicant will: a. Leave open to the public the existing parking lot (“Old Lot”) at 955 W Vistoso Highlands Dr. (“Property”), and the existing trail on the adjacent parcel 219-19-1840 (“Old Trail”) until a temporary parking is established on Town property. b. For the new Preserve trail (“New Trail”) as identified on DP 2301236 and located south of the Easement Area south of the Property, the final improved paved New Trail will be provided prior to the demolition of the Old Trail, and is subject to Parks & Recreation Director and Planning Manager approval. c. For the new Preserve public parking lot (“New Lot”), grading and temporary improvements of the New Lot, subject to Town Engineer and Parks & Recreation Director approval, shall occur prior to the demolition of the Old Lot in order to limit interruption to available Preserve parking. d. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the apartments, all components of the New Lot shall be constructed to include 21 spaces on a decomposed granite (or similar) surface, a paved connection to Vistoso Highlands Drive, two ADA paved parking spaces, and an ADA compliant path to the existing trails within the Preserve. Final design, installation, and inspection shall be subject to Parks and Recreation Director, Town Engineer, and Planning Manager approval. e. Applicant will be responsible for the cost of constructing the Preserve public parking lot (“New Lot”), with the following conditions: for any cost of construction above $50,000.00, applicant will receive Parks development impact fee credits, and the applicant’s total costs to construct the parking lot shall not exceed the amount of the project’s total Parks Impact Fee plus $50,000.00. 2. The exact location of the natural trail on Town property near the west side of parcel 219-19- 1840 must be field verified and approved by the Parks and Recreation Director prior to installation. It must be installed in accordance with Town standards prior to Certificate of Occupancy for the apartment development. Item B – Development and Landscape Plans (2301236) Planning 1. Use of the Town property and conservation easement area adjacent to the southern edge of parcel 219-19-1910 shall be reduced to no more than 1.5 acres in total area. The site plan must be revised accordingly subject to Planning and Zoning Administrator and Town Engineer approval. Stormwater 2. The proposed erosion hazard setback must be a minimum of 15 feet off the top of the bank per Town Ordinance 17-5-9(A). Revise accordingly. (Development Plan sheet 4 & Drainage Report page 35). 3. Finish floor elevation must a minimum of 1 foot above the upstream adjacent to the Q100 water surfaces elevation. Revise accordingly. (Development Plan sheet 9). Revise accordingly. 4. Show all off-site channel improvements within an easement. Including wall toe down, erosion protection, etc. (Development Plan sheet 9). 5. Show maintenance access into the adjacent wash and how someone would access the culvert and the walls along the wash to maintain them. Dashed lines can be used to show the proposed maintenance path. (Development Plan sheet 9). 6. Show elevation on this sheet. (Development Plan sheet 11). 7. Show Water Surface Elevations. (Development plan sheet 12). Item C – Amended Easement Agreement 1. A revised legal description and survey shall be provided to reflect the final extent of encroachment into the “Easement Area” as approved in the associated Development Plan (Item B), subject to the Planning and Zoning Administrator and Town Engineer approval. WBF WBFWBFWBF W BFW BFWBFSDSDSDWBFWBF VISTOSO GOLFCASITASHIGH DENSITYRESIDENTIALOPEN SPACERECREATIONRECREATIONVISTOSO HIGHLANDSNEIGHBORHOODOPEN SPACEVISTOSO HIGHLANDSNEIGHBORHOODMEDIUM HIGH DENSITYRESIDENTIAL219-19-4980HIGH DENSITYRESIDENTIAL OPENSPACE219-19-4690219-19-0930219-19-1260STONE VILLAGENEIGHBORHOODMEDIUM DENSITYRESIDENTIAL219-19-182A219-19-1150219-19-1140219-19-1120219-19-1110219-19-182A219-19-1270219-19-1890219-19-252A219-19-1950219-19-1950NN48" BOX48" BOX36" BOX36" BOX36" BOX36" BOX36" BOX36" BOX36" BOX36" BOX36" BOX36" BOX36" BOX36" BOX36" BOX48" BOXN48" BOX48" BOX48" BOX48" BOX48" BOX48" BOX48" BOX48" BOX48" BOX48" BOX48" BOXNNNNNNNNNNN36" BOX48" BOX48" BOX48" BOX36" BOXNN36" BOX36" BOXNN48" BOX48" BOX36" BOX36" BOX36" BOXOWNER/DEVELOPER:OV 132, LLC6340 N. CAMPBELL AV., SUITE 170TUCSON, AZ 85718ATTN: ROSS RULNEYPH: (520) 850-9300E: rossrulney@gmail.comPLANNING & ZONING ADMINISTRATORNORTH0'40'80'160'SCALE: 1"=80'DATEARCHITECT:a23 STUDIOS711 EAST 9TH STREEETTUCSON, AZ 85719ATTN: MR. BURAK BEKATPH: (520) 903-2323E: info@a23studios.comENGINEER:RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY3945 E. FORT LOWELL RD., SUITE 111TUCSON, AZ 85712ATTN: KEVIN HALLPH: (520) 795-1000khall@rickengineering.comLANDSCAPE & NATIVE PLANT PACKAGEGATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVECASE #2301236SUBMITTAL HISTORY:06/02/231ST SUBMITTALTOWN OF ORO VALLEYLANDSCAPE & NATIVE PLANTPACKAGEGATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVEA PORTION OF THE S.E. 1/4 OF SECTION23, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST,G.&S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMACOUNTY, ARIZONA2203155,2301138,2301232CASE#2301236I:\PROJECTS\CCD-15\AUTOCAD\WORKING DRAWINGS\CCD-15_LPKG EC2.DWG, 03/07/2024, 11:03 AM, KENDRA POTTERPROJECT:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:DATE:REVISIONS/SUBMITTALSDATE# OF CASE NO:REFERENCE:CALL TWO WORKINGDAYS BEFORE YOU DIG602-263-11001-800-STAKE-IT(OUTSIDEMARICOPA COUNTY)FOR AGENCY REVIEW AND APPROVAL ONLY. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION. NOT FOR BIDDINGTHE USE OF PLANS PREPARED BY THE PLANNING CENTER SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE ORIGINAL SITE FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED AND PUBLICATION THEREOF IS LIMITED TO SUCH USE. REPRODUCTION, PUBLICATION OR RE-USE BY ANY METHOD, IN WHOLE OR PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS PROHIBITED. TITLE TO THESE CONCEPTS AND PLANS R E M A I N W I T H T H E L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T W I T H O U T P R E J U D I C E . V I S U A L C O N T A C T W I T H T H E P L A N S S H A L L C O N S T I T U T E P R I M A F A C I E E V I D E N C E O F T H E A C C E P T A N C E O F T H E S E R E S T R I C T I O N S . T H E D R A W I N G S O R C O N C E P T S S H A L L N O T B E U S E D I N P A R T O R I N W H O L E F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N W I T H O U T J U S T C O M P E N S A T I O N A N D P E R M I S S I O N F R O M T H E P L A N N I N G C E N T E R .THEPLGCEANNNINERTadiviiIsooonfnTPCGrup,c.escrconegtetuosnaz857012600520.623.6146520.622.1950azplanningcenter.comssDANIEL A.BRADSHAW58092EXPIRES 06/30/ 2 6 03/07/24CCD-1503/07/24KDPDBCOVER133STEPROCK CANYON PLACEM&P (PRIVATE)BOWCREEK SPRINGS PLACEM&P (PRIVATE)VISTOSO HIGHLANDS DRIVEM&P (PUBLIC)LEGENDWashProject BoundaryTHIS SHEETEC-1SR-0SR-1N-0N-1N-2N-3N-4N-5N-6LS-0LS-1LS-2LS-3LS-4LD-1R-1R-2R-3R-4R-5R-6R-7R-8R-9R-10HD-1HD-2HD-3HD-4HD-5HD-6LANDSCAPE & NATIVE PLANT PACKAGE COVEREXISTING CONDITIONS PLANSITE RESOURCE INVENTORY COVERSITE RESOURCE INVENTORYNATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLAN COVERNATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLANNATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLANNATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLANNATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION NOTESNATIVE PLANT INVENTORYNATIVE PLANT INVENTORYLANDSCAPE PLAN COVERLANDSCAPE PLANLANDSCAPE PLANLANDSCAPE PLANLANDSCAPE PLAN NOTESLANDSCAPE DETAILSRECREATION AREA & HARDSCAPE PLANRECREATION AREA & HARDSCAPE PLAN NOTESRECREATION AREA & HARDSCAPE PLANRECREATION AREA & HARDSCAPE PLANRECREATION AREA & HARDSCAPE PLANREC & HS PLAN RECREATION AREA #1REC & HS PLAN RECREATION AREAS #2 & #3REC & HS PLAN RECREATION AREA #4HARDSCAPE & GROUNDCOVERWALLSHARDSCAPE DETAILSHARDSCAPE DETAILSHARDSCAPE DETAILSHARDSCAPE DETAILSHARDSCAPE DETAILSHARDSCAPE DETAILSSHEET INDEX:GENERAL NOTES:1.Gross area of development in acres: 9.77 AC (including 3.0 AC offsite work)2.Total acres of graded area: 9.77 AC3.Total acres of undisturbed area: 04.Total amount of open space required and provided (as defined in Chapter 31Definitions) Open Space Required: 30% of the gross area of the siteOpen Space Provided: 37.7% (including landscape common areas; excludingtrailhead use area) Total amount of Landscaped Common Areas: 158,197 SF.5.Landscape Bufferyard "A" Residential Street Frontage along Vistoso Highlands Dr.(Minimum 15 ft.) Landscaped buffer yards appropriately labeled per OVZCR Table27.7.6.The existing zoning for A.P.N. 219-19-1910 is Rancho Vistoso PAD 'HDR.' (See PADdocument dated June 22, 1987 Ordinance # (O) 06-02 (latest amendment.) Theexisting zoning for A.P.N. 219-19-1840 is RV PAD 'Open Space.' The proposedzoning for A.P.N. 219-19-1840 is RV PAD 'Recreation Area/Golf Course.' (See Sheet2 civil notes for 'Rezoning Conditions.'7.Classification of each perimeter street abutting the property and type and width ofstreet buffer yards provided.8.Landscape to conform to Oro Valley Landscape Code.9.Mitigation of surveyed plants in the Native Plant Preservation Plan will be incorporatedin the landscape design.10.Assurances for landscaping and re-vegetation bonds must be posted prior to issuanceof grading permits. A landscape bond in the amount of 10% of the original landscapebond shall remain in place for a period of one year from the complete installation oflandscape materials and any replacement materials.11.Property owner shall maintain buffer yard plantings to ensure unobstructed visibility tomotorists. All shrubs, accents, and groundcovers shall not exceed thirty (30") inches inheight within site visibility triangles. Trees within site visibility triangles will bemaintained to ensure that branches/foliage is not below a height of six (6') feet andthe diameter should not exceed 1-foot when fully mature.12.Property owners, lessees, and occupants shall maintain required landscape, irrigation,buffering, screening, and rainwater harvesting system improvements per the approvedplans.13.In the event of abandonment of the site after grading/disturbance of natural areas,disturbed areas shall be re-vegetated with a non-irrigated hydro seed mix from theOVZCR Addendum D: Approved revegetation seed mix.14.All plant material shall meet the minimum standards contained in the current editionsof the Arizona Nursery Association's Growers Committee Recommended TreeSpecifications and the American Association of Nurserymen as to size, condition, andappearance.15.Property owner is responsible for maintaining the temporary irrigation system as longas necessary in order to transition plants over to natural sources. Any plant materialsthat die in transition, for any reason, shall be replaced in accordance with Sec.27.6.E.4, Maintenance. Metered water use for landscape irrigation shall be reducedby fifty percent, five years from the date of the issuance of the certificate ofoccupancy.16.Any spaded or boxed tree transplanted on site that dies due to neglect or lack ofmaintenance shall be replaced with the same size and species of the originalsalvaged tree, as required by the salvage plan.17.The limits of grading shall be staked in the field, in accordance with Section27.6.B.7.c.ii of the Zoning Code. Disturbance outside the approved grading limits shallnot be permitted.18.No salvage of plants regulated by the Endangered Species Act and/or the ArizonaNative Plant Law may occur without the issuance of the appropriate permit by theState Department of Agriculture.19.Landscape materials shall not obstruct sight distances or vehicle turning movements.20.Landscaped areas that are susceptible to damage by pedestrian or auto traffic shallbe protected by appropriate curbs, tree guards, or other devices.21.Landscape shall be designed to minimize sediment, sand, and gravel being carriedinto the streets from storm water or other runoff.22.Landscape plan enables adequate plant spacing to ensure survivability at plantmaturity.23.Deep rooted vegetation and trees shall not be planted closer than 7.5' from a publicwater line. Exceptions for alternative design solutions such as root barriers shall beconsidered on a case-by-case basis.24.Curb-way consisting of inorganic groundcover or plants not to exceed type 2 wateruse shall be provided between curb and all sidewalks.25.All landscaped areas to be finished with a natural topping material to a depth of atleast two (2) inches.26.There are no overlay zones applicable to the property.27.Table for each buffer yard that indicates buffer yard type, width/length, and number ofrequired and provided trees, shrubs, and accent plants. (See sheet LS-0)28.The proposed development will have trails:i.All trail easements indicated are for use by the general public as permanent,non-motorized trail easements.ii.All public trails and signage must be constructed by the developer to PimaRegional Trail System Master Plan standards in consultation with the Town Parksand Recreation department. The applicable cross-section is included within theseplans.iii.Trail and sign locations, as indicated on this plan, must be field verified by Townstaff prior to construction and are subject to adjustment.iv.Trails must be positioned in a manner to avoid vegetation and minimize potentialfor erosion.v.All trails wihtin Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve shall be constructed of permeablematerial.vi.Public trail easements must be dedicated to the Town as part of the final plat. TheTown of Oro Valley shall accept ownership of the public trails and be responsiblefor all maintenance of the public trails and trail easements post development.29.For residential developments, construction of all recreational amenities and public orprivate trails within the project limits must be completed by the time 35% of buildingpermits are issued per Section 26.5 of the Zoning Code. RANCHO VISTOSO PADHIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL219-19-1910SCALE: 3" = 1 MILENORTHLOCATION MAPCTRL PTN W2 SE4 2.94 AC SEC 23-11-13;CTRL PTN SE4 6.07 AC SEC 23-11-13 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONAHighlandsVistosoDr.Vistoso Blvd.Rancho2324262522232726STONE VILLAGEVISTOSO HIGHLANDSSUMMIT NORTH ATCENTER POINTEFAIRFIELDDISCOVERYWORLDMARKSTONEGATESTONE CANYON PHASE 1STREET OF DREAMSOPEN SPACEHIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIALMEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIALMEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIALRECREATION AREA/GOLF COURSELOW DENSITY RESIDENTIALSTONE CANYON PHASE XSIENAPINNACLE ATCENTER POINTEDESERT CREST ATCENTER POINTEZONINGNEIGHBORHOODSPSVFSIDCSNSGSDVHSCDC654321PSISXSDSGWDFSNVHSVSX55333333225544666666611111111219-19-18402ND SUBMITTALTOWN OF ORO VALLEY100-year Floodplain10/13/23PROJECTBOUNDARYHIGHLANDSWASHTHISPROJECTBUFFERYARD "A"(15' WIDE)TRAILCONNECTIONLANDSCAPE INRIGHT-OF-WAYLIMITS OFGRADINGUNKNOWN WASH(2,000-5,000 cfs)100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN100 YEAR FLOODPLAINLIMITS OFGRADINGLIMITS OFGRADINGLIMITS OFGRADINGLIMITS OFGRADINGLIMITS OFGRADINGLIMITS OFGRADING3RD SUBMITTALTOWN OF ORO VALLEY11/22/234TH SUBMITTALTOWN OF ORO VALLEY01/10/24 296529652 9 6 5296029552955296029552955 295529552 9 5 5 2 9 6 0 296 0 E 7600 E 7800 E 8000 E 8200 E 8400 E 8600 296529602 9 5 5295029602960 296529602960 2960 WWBFJBECCCCEMUMOPEN SPACERECREATIONRECREATIONOPEN SPACE219-19-4980 OPENSPACE219-19-4690219-19-0930STONE VILLAGENEIGHBORHOODMEDIUM DENSITYRESIDENTIAL219-19-182A219-19-182A219-19-1890219-19-1950219-19-1950NORTH0'20'40'80'SCALE: 1"=40'LANDSCAPE & NATIVE PLANTPACKAGEGATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVEA PORTION OF THE S.E. 1/4 OF SECTION23, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST,G.&S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMACOUNTY, ARIZONA2203155,2301138,2301232CASE#2301236I:\PROJECTS\CCD-15\AUTOCAD\WORKING DRAWINGS\CCD-15_LPKG EC2.DWG, 03/07/2024, 11:03 AM, KENDRA POTTERPROJECT:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:DATE:REVISIONS/SUBMITTALSDATE# OF CASE NO:REFERENCE:CALL TWO WORKINGDAYS BEFORE YOU DIG602-263-11001-800-STAKE-IT(OUTSIDEMARICOPA COUNTY)FOR AGENCY REVIEW AND APPROVAL ONLY. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION. NOT FOR BIDDINGTHE USE OF PLANS PREPARED BY THE PLANNING CENTER SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE ORIGINAL SITE FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED AND PUBLICATION THEREOF IS LIMITED TO SUCH USE. REPRODUCTION, PUBLICATION OR RE-USE BY ANY METHOD, IN WHOLE OR PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS PROHIBITED. TITLE TO THESE CONCEPTS AND PLANS R E M A I N W I T H T H E L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T W I T H O U T P R E J U D I C E . V I S U A L C O N T A C T W I T H T H E P L A N S S H A L L C O N S T I T U T E P R I M A F A C I E E V I D E N C E O F T H E A C C E P T A N C E O F T H E S E R E S T R I C T I O N S . T H E D R A W I N G S O R C O N C E P T S S H A L L N O T B E U S E D I N P A R T O R I N W H O L E F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N W I T H O U T J U S T C O M P E N S A T I O N A N D P E R M I S S I O N F R O M T H E P L A N N I N G C E N T E R .THEPLGCEANNNINERTadiviiIsooonfnTPCGrup,c.escrconegtetuosnaz857012600520.623.6146520.622.1950azplanningcenter.comssDANIEL A.BRADSHAW58092EXPIRES 06/30/ 2 6 03/07/24CCD-1503/07/24KDPDBEC-1233LEGENDWashProject BoundaryEXISTING CONDITIONSN STEPROCK CANYON PLACEM&P (PRIVATE)N. BOWC R E E K S P R I N G S PLACE M&P (PRI V A T E )VISTOSO HIGHLANDS DRIVEM&P (PUBLIC)Highlands Wash(2,000-5,000 cfs)Unknown Wash(2,000-5,000 cfs)Existing Fenceto be RemovedExisting Walland Canopy tobe RemovedExisting Buildingto be RemovedPADUNSUBDIVIDEDCIVICPADUNSUBDIVIDEDCIVICPADUNSUBDIVIDEDCIVICExisting Concrete tobe RemovedExisting Concrete tobe RemovedExisting Buildingto be RemovedExisting Buildingto be RemovedExisting Parking Areato be RemovedExisting Concrete tobe RemovedExisting Brick Sidewalkto be RemovedExisting Hardscapeto be Removed80' R.O.W. 40' HALF R.O.W. 40' HALF R.O.W. 37.9±PAVE.WIDTH Limits of Grading100-yr Floodplain100-yr Floodplain100-year FloodplainLimits ofGradingLimits ofGradingLimits ofGradingLimits ofGradingLimits ofGrading WBF WBFWBFWBF W BFW BFWBFSDSDSD295729582958295929562955295429532952WBFWBF VISTOSO GOLFCASITASHIGH DENSITYRESIDENTIALOPEN SPACERECREATIONRECREATIONVISTOSO HIGHLANDSNEIGHBORHOODOPEN SPACEVISTOSO HIGHLANDSNEIGHBORHOODMEDIUM HIGH DENSITYRESIDENTIAL219-19-4980HIGH DENSITYRESIDENTIAL OPENSPACE219-19-4690219-19-0930219-19-1260STONE VILLAGENEIGHBORHOODMEDIUM DENSITYRESIDENTIAL219-19-182A219-19-1150219-19-1140219-19-1120219-19-1110219-19-182A219-19-1270219-19-1890219-19-252A219-19-1950219-19-1950618619620621617616615614613612611610609608606607605S101S102SITE RESOURCE INVENTORYGATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVEA PORTION OF THE S.E. 1/4 OF SECTION23, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST,G.&S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMACOUNTY, ARIZONA2203155,2301138,2301232CASE#2301236I:\PROJECTS\CCD-15\AUTOCAD\WORKING DRAWINGS\CCD-15_SRI.DWG, 03/07/2024, 11:03 AM, KENDRA POTTERPROJECT:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:DATE:REVISIONS/SUBMITTALSDATE# OF CASE NO:REFERENCE:CALL TWO WORKINGDAYS BEFORE YOU DIG602-263-11001-800-STAKE-IT(OUTSIDEMARICOPA COUNTY)FOR AGENCY REVIEW AND APPROVAL ONLY. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION. NOT FOR BIDDINGTHE USE OF PLANS PREPARED BY THE PLANNING CENTER SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE ORIGINAL SITE FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED AND PUBLICATION THEREOF IS LIMITED TO SUCH USE. REPRODUCTION, PUBLICATION OR RE-USE BY ANY METHOD, IN WHOLE OR PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS PROHIBITED. TITLE TO THESE CONCEPTS AND PLANS R E M A I N W I T H T H E L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T W I T H O U T P R E J U D I C E . V I S U A L C O N T A C T W I T H T H E P L A N S S H A L L C O N S T I T U T E P R I M A F A C I E E V I D E N C E O F T H E A C C E P T A N C E O F T H E S E R E S T R I C T I O N S . T H E D R A W I N G S O R C O N C E P T S S H A L L N O T B E U S E D I N P A R T O R I N W H O L E F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N W I T H O U T J U S T C O M P E N S A T I O N A N D P E R M I S S I O N F R O M T H E P L A N N I N G C E N T E R .THEPLGCEANNNINERTadiviiIsooonfnTPCGrup,c.escrconegtetuosnaz857012600520.623.6146520.622.1950azplanningcenter.comssDANIEL A.BRADSHAW58092EXPIRES 06/30/ 2 6 03/07/24CCD-1503/07/24KDPDBSR-0333PLANNING & ZONING ADMINISTRATORDATEVISTOSO HIGHLANDS DRIVEM&P (PUBLIC) RANCHO VISTOSO PADHIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL219-19-1910HIGHLANDS WASH(2,000-5,000 CFS)UNKNOWN WASH(2,000-5,000 CFS)Pima County Pictometry 2022SITE RESOURCE INVENTORYGATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVECASE #2301236GENERAL NOTES:1.Gross area of development in acres: 9.77 AC (including 3.0 AC offsite work)2.Total acres of graded area: 9.77 AC3.Total acres of undisturbed area: none4.List the tag colors representing plants scheduled to be:WHITE: Preserved in PlaceBLUE: Transplanted on-siteYELLOW: Removed from site5.Any spaded or boxed tree transplanted on site that dies due to neglect orlack of maintenance shall be replaced with the same size and species of theoriginal salvaged tree, as required by the salvage plan.6.No salvage of plants regulated by the Endangered Species Act and/or theArizona Native Plant Law may occur without the issuance of the appropriatepermit by the State Department of Agriculture.7.Salvage of operations shall not commence until the Zoning inspector hasperformed an inspection and given approval to be salvaged.8.Temporary nursery shall be in conformance with Section 7.6.B.4.j.9.Mitigation of Significant Vegetation shall be in accordance with Table 27-1Mitigation of Significant Vegetation.10.Any plant that meets the salvage criteria in Section 27.6.B.4 shall bepreserved in place or transplanted on-site. Any plants that meet the salvagecriteria that are destroyed shall be replaced on a one-to-one ratio of the samespecies and size as that destroyed. Five understory plants from thesupplemental Arizona Department of Water Quality native plant list will beplanted for every mitigated tree.11.The limits of grading shall be staked in the field, in accordance with Section27.6.B.7.c.ii Disturbance outside the approved grading limits shall not bepermitted.12.Significant Vegetation Information:Total amount present on-site (square feet): 3,518 SFTotal amount being disturbed (square feet): 3,518 SFTotal percentage disturbed: 100%NumberRemovedBotanical NameCommon NameMitigationRatioReplacement PlantsUnderstoryRequired*Qty3ACACIA GREGGIICATCLAW ACACIA2:148" Box31536"Box31CERCIDIUM FLORIDUMBLUE PALO VERDE2:148" Box1536"Box112CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUMFOOTHILLS PALO VERDE2:148" Box126036"Box123PROSOPIS VELUTINAVELVET MESQUITE2:148" Box31536"Box3Total3895*Required Understory: 5 understory plants per tree mitigatedTHIS SHEETSR-1COVERSITE RESOURCE INVENTORYSHEET INDEX:SUBMITTAL HISTORY:TOWN OF ORO VALLEYROCKOUTCROPPINGNORTH0'40'80'160'SCALE: 1"=80'LEGENDRezoning AreaSlope 15% to less than 18%Slope 18% to less than 20%Slope 20% to less than 25%Slope 25% to less than 33%Slope 33% or GreaterProject BoundarySTEPROCK CANYON PLACEM&P (PRIVATE)BOWCREEK SPRINGS PLACEM&P (PRIVATE)TRAILCONNECTIONOWNER/DEVELOPER:OV 132, LLC6340 N. CAMPBELL AV., SUITE 170TUCSON, AZ 85718ATTN: ROSS RULNEYPH: (520) 850-9300E: rossrulney@gmail.comARCHITECT:a23 STUDIOS711 EAST 9TH STREEETTUCSON, AZ 85719ATTN: MR. BURAK BEKATPH: (520) 903-2323E: info@a23studios.comENGINEER:RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY3945 E. FORT LOWELL RD., SUITE 111TUCSON, AZ 85712ATTN: KEVIN HALLPH: (520) 795-1000khall@rickengineering.comSCALE: 3" = 1 MILENORTHLOCATION MAPCTRL PTN W2 SE4 2.94 AC SEC 23-11-13;CTRL PTN SE4 6.07 AC SEC 23-11-13 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONAHighlandsVistosoDr.Vistoso Blvd.Rancho2324262522232726STONE VILLAGEVISTOSO HIGHLANDSSUMMIT NORTH ATCENTER POINTEFAIRFIELDDISCOVERYWORLDMARKSTONEGATESTONE CANYON PHASE 1STREET OF DREAMSOPEN SPACEHIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIALMEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIALMEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIALRECREATION AREA/GOLF COURSELOW DENSITY RESIDENTIALSTONE CANYON PHASE XSIENAPINNACLE ATCENTER POINTEDESERT CREST ATCENTER POINTEZONINGNEIGHBORHOODS11111111666666644552233333355SXSVVHSNFDWSGSDSXSIP123456DCSCVHSDSGSNDCSIFSVPProjectBoundary101Inventoried Significant VegetationWash06/02/231ST SUBMITTALSignificant Vegetation Mitigation TableTOWN OF ORO VALLEY2ND SUBMITTAL100-year FloodplainTOTAL UNDERSTORY PROVIDED: 95100YR FLOODPLAIN100YR FLOODPLAIN10/13/23LIMITS OFGRADINGLIMITS OFGRADINGLIMITS OFGRADINGPROJECTBOUNDARYLIMITS OFGRADINGLIMITS OFGRADINGLIMITS OFGRADINGLIMITS OFGRADINGLIMITS OFGRADINGTOWN OF ORO VALLEY3RD SUBMITTAL11/22/23TOWN OF ORO VALLEY4TH SUBMITTAL01/10/24 SITE RESOURCE INVENTORYGATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVEA PORTION OF THE S.E. 1/4 OF SECTION23, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST,G.&S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMACOUNTY, ARIZONA2203155,2301138,2301232CASE#2301236I:\PROJECTS\CCD-15\AUTOCAD\WORKING DRAWINGS\CCD-15_SRI.DWG, 03/07/2024, 11:03 AM, KENDRA POTTERPROJECT:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:DATE:REVISIONS/SUBMITTALSDATE# OF CASE NO:REFERENCE:CALL TWO WORKINGDAYS BEFORE YOU DIG602-263-11001-800-STAKE-IT(OUTSIDEMARICOPA COUNTY)FOR AGENCY REVIEW AND APPROVAL ONLY. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION. NOT FOR BIDDINGTHE USE OF PLANS PREPARED BY THE PLANNING CENTER SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE ORIGINAL SITE FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED AND PUBLICATION THEREOF IS LIMITED TO SUCH USE. REPRODUCTION, PUBLICATION OR RE-USE BY ANY METHOD, IN WHOLE OR PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS PROHIBITED. TITLE TO THESE CONCEPTS AND PLANS R E M A I N W I T H T H E L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T W I T H O U T P R E J U D I C E . V I S U A L C O N T A C T W I T H T H E P L A N S S H A L L C O N S T I T U T E P R I M A F A C I E E V I D E N C E O F T H E A C C E P T A N C E O F T H E S E R E S T R I C T I O N S . T H E D R A W I N G S O R C O N C E P T S S H A L L N O T B E U S E D I N P A R T O R I N W H O L E F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N W I T H O U T J U S T C O M P E N S A T I O N A N D P E R M I S S I O N F R O M T H E P L A N N I N G C E N T E R .THEPLGCEANNNINERTadiviiIsooonfnTPCGrup,c.escrconegtetuosnaz857012600520.623.6146520.622.1950azplanningcenter.comssDANIEL A.BRADSHAW58092EXPIRES 06/30/ 2 6 03/07/24CCD-1503/07/24KDPDBSR-1433ID #BOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMEHEIGHT(FT)CALIPER(IN)TAGTREATMENTREASONS605CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUMFOOTHILLS PALO VERDE1512YELLOWRFSDEAD TRUNKDEAD LIMB606PROSOPIS VELUTINAVELVET MESQUITE1212YELLOWRFSDIEBACKDEAD TRUNK607CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUMFOOTHILLS PALO VERDE1212YELLOWRFSNOT SALVAGEABLELG SIZE/POOR SOIL CONDITIONS608CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUMFOOTHILLS PALO VERDE1212YELLOWRFSNOT SALVAGEABLELG SIZE/POOR SOIL CONDITIONS609CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUMFOOTHILLS PALO VERDE1216YELLOWRFSDEAD TRUNKDEAD LIMB610CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUMFOOTHILLS PALO VERDE1412YELLOWRFSDEAD TRUNKDEAD LIMB611ACACIA GREGGIICATCLAW ACACIA1512YELLOWRFSNOT SALVAGEABLELG SIZE/POOR SOIL CONDITIONS612CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUMFOOTHILLS PALO VERDE1615YELLOWRFSNOT SALVAGEABLELG SIZE/POOR SOIL CONDITIONS613CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUMFOOTHILLS PALO VERDE1714YELLOWRFSNOT SALVAGEABLELG SIZE/POOR SOIL CONDITIONS614CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUMFOOTHILLS PALO VERDE1514YELLOWRFSNOT SALVAGEABLELG SIZE/POOR SOIL CONDITIONS615ACACIA GREGGIICATCLAW ACACIA1614YELLOWRFSNOT SALVAGEABLELG SIZE/POOR SOIL CONDITIONS616CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUMFOOTHILLS PALO VERDE1514YELLOWRFSNOT SALVAGEABLELG SIZE/POOR SOIL CONDITIONS617CERCIDIUM FLORIDUMBLUE PALO VERDE1614YELLOWRFSNOT SALVAGEABLELG SIZE/POOR SOIL CONDITIONS618PROSOPIS VELUTINAVELVET MESQUITE1917YELLOWRFSNOT SALVAGEABLELG SIZE/POOR SOIL CONDITIONS619CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUMFOOTHILLS PALO VERDE1520YELLOWRFSDEAD TRUNKDEAD LIMB620ACACIA GREGGIICATCLAW ACACIA1815YELLOWRFSNOT SALVAGEABLELG SIZE/POOR SOIL CONDITIONS621CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUMFOOTHILLS PALO VERDE1412YELLOWRFSNOT SALVAGEABLELG SIZE/POOR SOIL CONDITIONSS101PROSOPIS VELUTINAVELVET MESQUITE1214YELLOWRFSDIEBACKPRIMARY BRANCH DEADS102CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUMFOOTHILLS PALO VERDE1830YELLOWRFSDIEBACKBAD BASESIGNIFICANT VEGETATION INVENTORYNOTE: A SIGNIFICANT VEGETATION ID# PREFIXED WITH "S" IS A TAG DISTINGUISHING A PLANT FROM ONE ON THE NATIVE PLANT INVENTORY WITH A SIMILAR ID#.SRI NOTES:1.The extents of this SRI include APNs: 219-19-1910; APN219-19-1840; and APN 219-19-1950.2.There are no Distinct Native Plant Stands on-site.3.This aerial photo is less than two years old.4.The site features a combination of constructed and native landscape.Areas of constructed landscape are excluded from this inventory.5.Native Plant species present include: Whitethorn Acacia (Acaciaconstricta,) Catclaw Acacia (Acacia greggii,) Saguaros (Carnegiagigantea,) Desert Hackberry (Celtis pallida,) Blue Palo Verde(Cercidium Floridum,) Foothills Palo Verde Trees (Cercidiummicrophyllum,) Fishhook Barrel Cactus (Ferocactus wislizenii,) Ocotillo(Fouquieria splendens,) Ironwood Trees (Olneya Tesota,) VelvetMesquite Trees (Prosopis velutina.)6.The significant species are identified on the map.TREATMENT LEGENDPIP: Preserved in Place (White Tag)TOS: Transplanted on-site (Blue Tag)RFS: Removed from site (Yellow Tag)SITE RESOURCE INVENTORY 296529652 9 6 5296029552955296029552955 295529552 9 5 5 2 9 6 0 296 0 296529602 9 5 5 2960295029502955 29602960296529602 9 6 0 2965 2960 2960VISTOSO GOLFCASITASHIGH DENSITYRESIDENTIALOPEN SPACERECREATIONRECREATIONVISTOSO HIGHLANDSNEIGHBORHOODOPEN SPACEVISTOSO HIGHLANDSNEIGHBORHOODMEDIUM HIGH DENSITYRESIDENTIAL219-19-4980HIGH DENSITYRESIDENTIAL OPENSPACE219-19-4690219-19-0930219-19-1260STONE VILLAGENEIGHBORHOODMEDIUM DENSITYRESIDENTIAL219-19-182A219-19-1150219-19-1140219-19-1120219-19-1110219-19-182A219-19-1270219-19-1890219-19-252A219-19-1950R=750.00' D = 4 7 ° 0 0" L = 6 1 5 .23 ' N 60°00' W 485.27' R=710.00' D=47°0 0 ' L = 5 8 2. 4 2 ' N 73°00'00" E 3 7 3 . 8 4219-19-1950WWBFJBECCCCEMUMWBF WBFWBFWBF W BFW BFWBFWBFWSDSDSD295729582958295929562955295429532952WBFWBFS102 S101621620619618617616615614613612611610609608607606605105106107113115116*118122124125128130131132136137139140143146148157158159160161162164165100167168169170171172173175176179182184185187188189190191193194196197198201203204206214215216218220221228229231232234236237238239240241242243244245246247248252253255260261262280281284309311312315318321322323324325332333351100102103104108109110111112114117118120121123126127129133134135138141142144145147149150151152153154155156163174177178180181183186192195199200202205207208209210211212213217219100223224225226227230233235249250251254256257258259263264265266267268269270271272273274275276277278279282283285286287288289290291292293293295296297298299300301302303304305306307308310312314316317319320326326328329334335336336337339340341342342344345346347348349350352353354355522PLANNING & ZONING ADMINISTRATORNORTH0'40'80'160'SCALE: 1"=80'DATENATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLANGATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVECASE #2301236THIS SHEETN-1N-2N-3N-4N-5N-6COVERNATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLANNATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLANNATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLANNATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLAN NOTESNATIVE PLANT INVENTORYNATIVE PLANT INVENTORYSHEET INDEX:SUBMITTAL HISTORY:TOWN OF ORO VALLEYNATIVE PLANT PRESERVATIONPLANGATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVEA PORTION OF THE S.E. 1/4 OF SECTION23, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST,G.&S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMACOUNTY, ARIZONA2203155,2301138,2301232CASE#2301236I:\PROJECTS\CCD-15\AUTOCAD\WORKING DRAWINGS\CCD-15_NPPO.DWG, 03/07/2024, 11:03 AM, KENDRA POTTERPROJECT:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:DATE:REVISIONS/SUBMITTALSDATE# OF CASE NO:REFERENCE:CALL TWO WORKINGDAYS BEFORE YOU DIG602-263-11001-800-STAKE-IT(OUTSIDEMARICOPA COUNTY)FOR AGENCY REVIEW AND APPROVAL ONLY. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION. NOT FOR BIDDINGTHE USE OF PLANS PREPARED BY THE PLANNING CENTER SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE ORIGINAL SITE FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED AND PUBLICATION THEREOF IS LIMITED TO SUCH USE. REPRODUCTION, PUBLICATION OR RE-USE BY ANY METHOD, IN WHOLE OR PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS PROHIBITED. TITLE TO THESE CONCEPTS AND PLANS R E M A I N W I T H T H E L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T W I T H O U T P R E J U D I C E . V I S U A L C O N T A C T W I T H T H E P L A N S S H A L L C O N S T I T U T E P R I M A F A C I E E V I D E N C E O F T H E A C C E P T A N C E O F T H E S E R E S T R I C T I O N S . T H E D R A W I N G S O R C O N C E P T S S H A L L N O T B E U S E D I N P A R T O R I N W H O L E F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N W I T H O U T J U S T C O M P E N S A T I O N A N D P E R M I S S I O N F R O M T H E P L A N N I N G C E N T E R .THEPLGCEANNNINERTadiviiIsooonfnTPCGrup,c.escrconegtetuosnaz857012600520.623.6146520.622.1950azplanningcenter.comssCCD-1503/07/24KDPDBN-0533DANIEL A.BRADSHAW58092EXPIRES 06/30/ 2 6GENERAL NOTES:1.Gross area of development in acres: 9.77 AC (including 3.0 AC offsitework)2.Total acres of graded area: 9.77 AC3.Total acres of undisturbed area: none4.List the tag colors representing plants scheduled to be:White Tag: Preserved in PlaceBlue Tag: Transplanted on-siteYellow: Removed from site5.Any spaded or boxed tree transplanted on site that dies due to neglector lack of maintenance shall be replaced with the same size andspecies of the original salvaged tree, as required by the salvage plan.6.No salvage of plants regulated by the Endangered Species Act and/orthe Arizona Native Plant Law may occur without the issuance of theappropriate permit by the State Department of Agriculture.7.Salvage of operations shall not commence until the Zoning inspectorhas performed an inspection and given approval to be salvaged.8.Temporary nursery shall be in conformance with Section 7.6.B.4.j.9.Mitigation of Significant Vegetation shall be in accordance with Table27-1 Mitigation of Significant Vegetation.10.Any plant that meets the salvage criteria in Section 27.6.B.4 shall bepreserved in place or transplanted on-site. Any plants that meet thesalvage criteria that are destroyed shall be replaced on a one-to-oneratio of the same species and size as that destroyed. Five understoryplants from the supplemental Arizona Department of Water Qualitynative plant list will be planted for every mitigated tree.11.The limits of grading shall be staked in the field, in accordance withSection 27.6.B.7.c.ii Disturbance outside the approved grading limitsshall not be permitted.12.Significant Vegetation Information:Total amount present on-site (square feet): 3,518 SFTotal amount being disturbed (square feet): 3,518 SFTotal percentage disturbed: 100%SCALE: 3" = 1 MILENORTHLOCATION MAPCTRL PTN W2 SE4 2.94 AC SEC 23-11-13;CTRL PTN SE4 6.07 AC SEC 23-11-13 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONAHighlandsVistosoDr.Vistoso Blvd.Rancho2324262522232726SHEET N-1STONE VILLAGEVISTOSO HIGHLANDSSUMMIT NORTH ATCENTER POINTEFAIRFIELDDISCOVERYWORLDMARKSTONEGATESTONE CANYON PHASE 1STREET OF DREAMSOPEN SPACEHIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIALMEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIALMEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIALRECREATION AREA/GOLF COURSELOW DENSITY RESIDENTIALSTONE CANYON PHASE XSIENAPINNACLE ATCENTER POINTEDESERT CREST ATCENTER POINTEZONINGNEIGHBORHOODSVISTOSO HIGHLANDS DRIVEM&P (PUBLIC)SHEET N-2SHEET N-3LEGENDWash2' Contour IntervalProject BoundaryPROJECTBOUNDARYMATCHLINE12345611111111666666644552233333355SVVHSNFDWSGSDSXSXSIPDCSCVHSDSGSNDCSIFSVPHIGHLANDSWASHTHISPROJECT101Plant Preserved in Place101Transplant on Site101Remove from SiteBotanicalNameCommonNameTransplantRemovefrom SitePreserve in PlaceTotalper PlantACACIA CONTRICTAWHITETHORN ACACIA1819ACACIA GREGGIICATCLAW ACACIA119220CARNEGIEA GIGANTEASAGUARO141015CELTIS PALLIDADESERT HACKBERRY1405CERCIDIUM FLORIDUMBLUE PALO VERDE1112CERCIDIUMMICROPHYLLUMFOOTHILLS PALOVERDE1272184FEROCACTUS WISLIZENIIFISHHOOK BARREL5329082FOUQUIERIA SPLENDENSOCOTILLO152017OLNEYA TESOTAIRONWOOD2709PROSOPIS VELUTINAVELVET MESQUITE214516YUCCA ELATASOAPTREE YUCCA1001ZIZIPHUS OBTUSIFOLIAGRAYTHORN0303Total10316010263STEPROCK CANYON PLACEM&P (PRIVATE)BOWCREEK SPRINGS PLACEM&P (PRIVATE)ROCKOUTCROPPINGTRAILCONNECTIONOWNER/DEVELOPER:OV 132, LLC6340 N. CAMPBELL AV., SUITE 170TUCSON, AZ 85718ATTN: ROSS RULNEYPH: (520) 850-9300E: rossrulney@gmail.comARCHITECT:a23 STUDIOS711 EAST 9TH STREEETTUCSON, AZ 85719ATTN: MR. BURAK BEKATPH: (520) 903-2323E: info@a23studios.comENGINEER:RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY3945 E. FORT LOWELL RD., SUITE 111TUCSON, AZ 85712ATTN: KEVIN HALLPH: (520) 795-1000khall@rickengineering.com03/07/2406/02/231ST SUBMITTALNative Plant Summary TableSignificant Vegetation Mitigation TableTOWN OF ORO VALLEY2ND SUBMITTAL100-year FloodplainNumberRemovedBotanical NameCommon NameMitigationRatioReplacement PlantsUnderstoryRequired*Qty3ACACIA GREGGIICATCLAW ACACIA2:148" Box31536"Box31CERCIDIUM FLORIDUMBLUE PALO VERDE2:148" Box1536"Box112CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUMFOOTHILLS PALO VERDE2:148" Box126036"Box123PROSOPIS VELUTINAVELVET MESQUITE2:148" Box31536"Box3Total3895*Required Understory: 5 understory plants per tree mitigated10/13/23100YR FLOODPLAIN100YR FLOODPLAINUNKNOWN WASH(2,000 - 5,000 cfs)LIMITS OFGRADINGLIMITS OFGRADINGLIMITS OFGRADINGLIMITS OFGRADINGLIMITS OFGRADINGTOWN OF ORO VALLEY3RD SUBMITTAL11/22/23TOWN OF ORO VALLEY4TH SUBMITTAL01/10/24TEMPORARYNURSERY 2965 2960 295529 5 5 29602965 296029602960RECREATION 219-19-4980 219-19-0930 STONE VILLAGE NEIGHBORHOOD MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 219-19-182A R=750.00' D=47°00" L=615.23' N 60°00' W 4 8 5 . 2 7 ' R=710.00' D=47°00' L=582.42' N 73°00'00" E 373.8 4 219-19-1950 W W BF JB C C U WBF SD 29 5 7 2958 295 8 295 9 29562 9 5 5 29 5 4 295 3 WBF S102 S101 621 620 619 618 617 616 615 614 613 612 611 206 214 215 216 228229 231 232 234236 237 238 239 240 241242 243 244 245 246 247 248 252 253 255 260 261 262 280 281284 309 311 312 315 318 321 322 323 324 325 332 333 351 211 212 213 217 227 230 233235 249 250 251254 256 257 258 259 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276277 278 279 282283 285286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 293 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 310 312 314 316 317 319320 326 326 328 329 334 335 336 336 337 339 340 341 342 342 344345 346347 348 349350 352 353 354 355 522 NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLAN NORTH 0'15'30'60' SCALE: 1"=30' NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLAN GATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVE A PORTION OF THE S.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, G.&S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA 2203155, 2301138, 2301232 CASE #2301236 I:\PROJECTS\CCD-15\AUTOCAD\WORKING DRAWINGS\CCD-15_NPPO.DWG, 03/07/2024, 11:03 AM, KENDRA POTTERPROJECT: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS/SUBMITTALS DATE# OF CASE NO: REFERENCE: CALL TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG 602-263-1100 1-800-STAKE-IT (OUTSIDE MARICOPA COUNTY) F O R A G E N C Y R E V I E W A N D A P P R O V A L O N L Y . N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N . N O T F O R B I D D I N G THE USE OF PLANS PREPARED BY THE PLANNING CENTER SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE ORIGINAL SITE FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED AND PUBLICATION THEREOF IS LIMITED TO SUCH USE. REPRODUCTION, PUBLICATION OR RE-USE BY ANY METHOD, IN WHOLE OR PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS PROHIBITED. TITLE TO THESE CONCEPTS AND PLANSREMAIN WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WITHOUT PREJUDICE. VISUAL CONTACT WITH THE PLANS SHALL CONSTITUTE PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF THESE RESTRICTIONS. THE DRAWINGS OR CONCEPTS SHALL NOT BE USED IN PART OR IN WHOLE FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT JUST COMPENSATION AND PERMISSION FROM THE PLANNING CENTER.THE PL GCEANNNIN ERT a d i v i i Isooonf nTPCGrup,c. e scr conegtetu osn az 857012600 520.623.6146 520.622.1950 azplanningcenter.comss CCD-15 03/07/24 KDP DB N-1 6 33 DANIEL A. BRADSHAW 58092 E X PIRES 0 6 /3 0 /26MATCHLINE SHEET N-2MATCHLINE SHEET N-2THIS SHEET KEY MAP Vistoso H i g h l a n d s D r . VISTOS O H I G H L A N D S D R I V E M&P (P U B L I C )STEPROCK CANYON PLACEM&P (PRIVATE)LEGEND Wash 2' Contour Interval Project Boundary 101 Plant Preserved in Place 101 Transplant on Site 101 Remove from Site 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN 100-year Floodplain PROPERTY BOUNDARY UNKNOWN WASH (2,000 - 5,000 cfs) LIMITS OF GRADING LIMITS OF GRADING LIMITS OF GRADING LIMITS OF GRADING 03/07/24 2965 2965 2955 2960 29602 9 6 5 296 0 OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE RESIDENTIAL 219-19-1150 219-19-1120 219-19-1110 219-19-182A 219-19-1890 E C CEM M WBF WBF W BFW BFWBF WBF SD SD SD WBF611 610 609 608 607 606 605 105106 107 113 115 116 *118 122 124 125 128 130 131 132 136 137 139 140 143 146 148 157 158 159 160 161 162 164 165 100 167 168 169 170 171 172173 175 176 179 185187 188189 190 191 193 194 196 197 198 201 203 204 206 214 215 216 218 220 221 228229 231 232 234236 100 102 103 104 108 109 110 111 112 114 117 118 120 121123 126 127 129 133 134 135 138 141 142 144 145 147 149 150151 152 154 163 174 177 178 183 186 192195 199 200 202 205 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 217 219 100 223224 225 226 227 230 233235 NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLAN NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLAN GATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVE A PORTION OF THE S.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, G.&S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA 2203155, 2301138, 2301232 CASE #2301236 I:\PROJECTS\CCD-15\AUTOCAD\WORKING DRAWINGS\CCD-15_NPPO.DWG, 03/07/2024, 11:03 AM, KENDRA POTTERPROJECT: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS/SUBMITTALS DATE# OF CASE NO: REFERENCE: CALL TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG 602-263-1100 1-800-STAKE-IT (OUTSIDE MARICOPA COUNTY) F O R A G E N C Y R E V I E W A N D A P P R O V A L O N L Y . N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N . N O T F O R B I D D I N G THE USE OF PLANS PREPARED BY THE PLANNING CENTER SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE ORIGINAL SITE FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED AND PUBLICATION THEREOF IS LIMITED TO SUCH USE. REPRODUCTION, PUBLICATION OR RE-USE BY ANY METHOD, IN WHOLE OR PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS PROHIBITED. TITLE TO THESE CONCEPTS AND PLANSREMAIN WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WITHOUT PREJUDICE. VISUAL CONTACT WITH THE PLANS SHALL CONSTITUTE PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF THESE RESTRICTIONS. THE DRAWINGS OR CONCEPTS SHALL NOT BE USED IN PART OR IN WHOLE FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT JUST COMPENSATION AND PERMISSION FROM THE PLANNING CENTER.THE PL GCEANNNIN ERT a d i v i i Isooonf nTPCGrup,c. e scr conegtetu osn az 857012600 520.623.6146 520.622.1950 azplanningcenter.comss CCD-15 03/07/24 KDP DB N-2 7 33 DANIEL A. BRADSHAW 58092 E X PIRES 0 6 /3 0 /26MATCHLINE SHEET N-1MATCHLINE SHEET N-1MATCHLINE SHEET N-3 NORTH 0'15'30'60' SCALE: 1"=30' THIS SHEET MATCHLINE SHEET N-2MATCHLINE SHEET N-2KEY MAP Vistoso H i g h l a n d s D r . VIS T O S O H I G H L A N D S D R I V E M& P ( P U B L I C )BOWCREEK SPRINGS PLACEM&P (PRIVATE)LEGEND Wash 2' Contour Interval Project Boundary 101 Plant Preserved in Place 101 Transplant on Site 101 Remove from Site 100-year Floodplain 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN HIGHLANDS WASH LIMITS OF GRADING LIMITS OF GRADING 03/07/24 29602 9 5 5 2955 2 9 5 5 29552 9 5 0 296 0 29 6 0 OPEN SPACE RECREATION 219-19-1890 219-19-1950 609 608 607 606 605 143 146 148159160162 164 165 100 167 168 169 170 171 172173 175 176 179 182 184 185187 188189 190 191 193 194 196 197 198206 142 144 145 147 149 150151 152 153 154 155 156 163 174 177 178 180 181 183 186 192195 199 200 342 NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLAN NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLAN GATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVE A PORTION OF THE S.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, G.&S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA 2203155, 2301138, 2301232 CASE #2301236 I:\PROJECTS\CCD-15\AUTOCAD\WORKING DRAWINGS\CCD-15_NPPO.DWG, 03/07/2024, 11:03 AM, KENDRA POTTERPROJECT: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS/SUBMITTALS DATE# OF CASE NO: REFERENCE: CALL TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG 602-263-1100 1-800-STAKE-IT (OUTSIDE MARICOPA COUNTY) F O R A G E N C Y R E V I E W A N D A P P R O V A L O N L Y . N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N . N O T F O R B I D D I N G THE USE OF PLANS PREPARED BY THE PLANNING CENTER SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE ORIGINAL SITE FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED AND PUBLICATION THEREOF IS LIMITED TO SUCH USE. REPRODUCTION, PUBLICATION OR RE-USE BY ANY METHOD, IN WHOLE OR PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS PROHIBITED. TITLE TO THESE CONCEPTS AND PLANSREMAIN WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WITHOUT PREJUDICE. VISUAL CONTACT WITH THE PLANS SHALL CONSTITUTE PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF THESE RESTRICTIONS. THE DRAWINGS OR CONCEPTS SHALL NOT BE USED IN PART OR IN WHOLE FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT JUST COMPENSATION AND PERMISSION FROM THE PLANNING CENTER.THE PL GCEANNNIN ERT a d i v i i Isooonf nTPCGrup,c. e scr conegtetu osn az 857012600 520.623.6146 520.622.1950 azplanningcenter.comss CCD-15 03/07/24 KDP DB N-3 8 33 DANIEL A. BRADSHAW 58092 E X PIRES 0 6 /3 0 /26MATCHLINE SHEET N-1MATCHLINE SHEET N-2 NORTH 0'15'30'60' SCALE: 1"=30' Vistoso H i g h l a n d s D r . THIS SHEET KEY MAP LIMITS OF GRADING LEGEND Wash 2' Contour Interval Project Boundary 101 Plant Preserved in Place 101 Transplant on Site 101 Remove from Site 100-year Floodplain HIGHLANDS WASH 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN ROCK OUTCROPPING TRAIL CONNECTION PROJECT BOUNDARY TEMPORARY PLANT NURSERY LIMITS OF GRADING LIMITS OF GRADING 03/07/24 NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION NOTES 1. MITIGATION MEASURES AND PROCEDURES ALL SPECIES THAT ARE IDENTIFIED AS SALVAGEABLE WILL BE SALVAGED DURING THE COURSE OF THIS PROJECT AND UTILIZED ON SITE. THE PREFERRED METHOD OF TREE SALVAGE IS THE SPADE SALVAGE TECHNIQUE TO BE USED FOR THIS PROJECT. ALL TREES WHOSE CALIPER IS LESS THAN 6 INCHES MAY BE SALVAGED WITH A TREE SPADE. THIS ASSUMES THAT AN 60 INCH SPADE WILL BE USED FOR THE OPERATION AND THAT SOIL CONDITIONS ON THE SITE ARE AMENABLE TO SPADING. SPECIES SALVAGED WITH THE SPADE WILL BE MOVED ONLY ONE TIME - TO THEIR FINAL PLANTING LOCATION. THIS WILL REQUIRE CAREFUL COORDINATION BETWEEN THE PROJECT MANAGER, GRADING CONTRACTOR AND SPADE CONTRACTOR. THIS INCREASED EFFORT IS WARRANTED BY SIGNIFICANT COST SAVINGS OF A ONE MOVE SPADE OPERATION AND INCREASED SURVIVAL RATES ASSOCIATED WITH MOVING TREES ONLY ONCE WITH A SPADE AS OPPOSED TO MOVING THEM TWICE - ONCE TO A TEMPORARY HOLDING YARD AND THEN A SECOND TIME TO THE FINAL PLANTED LOCATION. ALL SALVAGED SPECIES WILL BE PROVIDED WITH TEMPORARY IRRIGATION AT THE HOLDING NURSERY AND PERMANENT IRRIGATION WHEN TRANSPLANTED TO THEIR FINAL LOCATION. AREAS WHERE SALVAGED SPECIES WILL BE TRANSPLANTED INCLUDE LANDSCAPED BUFFERYARDS, ENTRY MONUMENTATION, AND OTHER HIGHLY VISIBLE LANDSCAPED AREA. SALVAGE CONTRACTORS WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR GUARANTEEING ALL SALVAGED PLANT MATERIAL FOR A MINIMUM OF ONE YEAR IN THE HOLDING NURSERY AND FOR 90 DAYS ONCE TRANSPLANTED. ALL SPADED OR BOXED TREE TRANSPLANTED ON SITE THAT DIES DUE TO NEGLECT OR LACK OF MAINTENANCE SHALL BE REPLACED WITH THE SAME SIZE AND SPECIES OF THE ORIGINAL SALVAGED TREE, AS REQUIRED BY THE SALVAGE PLAN. 2. PRUNING LIMIT PRUNING TO LESS THAN 15% OF THE TOTAL TREE CANOPY. THE OBJECTIVE IS TO PROVIDE AN AESTHETIC FRAMEWORK OF BRANCHES THAT PRESERVES THE ORIGINAL NATURAL FEATURES OF THE TREE BEING SALVAGED. RESTRICT PRUNING TO THE SMALLEST POSSIBLE CUT JUST OUTSIDE OF THE BRANCH COLLAR. DO NOT PRUNE INTERIOR FOLIAGE. USE CLEAN TOOLS ONLY. PRUNE OUT ALL DEAD WOOD AND MISTLETOE. 3. IRRIGATION OF SALVAGED PLANTS IRRIGATION IN THE TEMPORARY HOLDING AREA WILL BE BY PVC / POLYETHYLENE DRIP SYSTEM CONFORMING TO PIMA COUNTY CODE, WITH A MANUAL OR AUTOMATIC CONTROL VALVE. THE SYSTEM WILL LATER BE ABANDONED / REMOVED. NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLAN GATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVE A PORTION OF THE S.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, G.&S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA 2203155, 2301138, 2301232 CASE #2301236 I:\PROJECTS\CCD-15\AUTOCAD\WORKING DRAWINGS\CCD-15_NPPO.DWG, 03/07/2024, 11:03 AM, KENDRA POTTERPROJECT: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS/SUBMITTALS DATE# OF CASE NO: REFERENCE: CALL TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG 602-263-1100 1-800-STAKE-IT (OUTSIDE MARICOPA COUNTY) F O R A G E N C Y R E V I E W A N D A P P R O V A L O N L Y . N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N . N O T F O R B I D D I N G THE USE OF PLANS PREPARED BY THE PLANNING CENTER SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE ORIGINAL SITE FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED AND PUBLICATION THEREOF IS LIMITED TO SUCH USE. REPRODUCTION, PUBLICATION OR RE-USE BY ANY METHOD, IN WHOLE OR PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS PROHIBITED. TITLE TO THESE CONCEPTS AND PLANSREMAIN WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WITHOUT PREJUDICE. VISUAL CONTACT WITH THE PLANS SHALL CONSTITUTE PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF THESE RESTRICTIONS. THE DRAWINGS OR CONCEPTS SHALL NOT BE USED IN PART OR IN WHOLE FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT JUST COMPENSATION AND PERMISSION FROM THE PLANNING CENTER.THE PL GCEANNNIN ERT a d i v i i Isooonf nTPCGrup,c. e scr conegtetu osn az 857012600 520.623.6146 520.622.1950 azplanningcenter.comss CCD-15 03/07/24 KDP DB N-4 9 33 DANIEL A. BRADSHAW 58092 E X PIRES 0 6 /3 0 /261 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FENCE DETAIL SCALE: NTS SIGNIFICANT VEGETATION INVENTORY Number Removed Botanical Name Common Name Mitigation Ratio Replacement Plants Understory Required* Qty 3 ACACIA GREGGII CATCLAW ACACIA 2:1 48" Box 3 15 36"Box 3 1 CERCIDIUM FLORIDUM BLUE PALO VERDE 2:1 48" Box 1 5 36"Box 1 12 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE 2:1 48" Box 12 60 36"Box 12 3 PROSOPIS VELUTINA VELVET MESQUITE 2:1 48" Box 3 15 36"Box 3 Total 38 95 *Required Understory: 5 understory plants per tree mitigated 4'TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FENCING PRODUCT: SAFETY FENCE | PROD ID: 37008365 MFR: SILT MANAGEMENT SUPPLIES (siltmanagementsupplies.com) MATERIAL: 8 LB POLYETHYLENE MESH SIZE: 4 FT HEIGHT COLOR: ORANGE VERTICAL SUPPORT PRODUCT: T-POST | PROD ID: 37272766 MFR: SILT MANAGEMENT SUPPLIES (siltmanagementsupplies.com) MATERIAL: 85 LB RAIL STEEL SIZE: 6 FT HEIGHT NOTES: 1. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FENCING TO BE PLACED AT LIMITS OF GRADING TO PROTECT EXISTING VEGETATION. 2. NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO DETERMINE MATERIAL TYPE APPROPRIATE TO SITE CONSTRUCTION. MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS DENOTE TYPICAL PRODUCT TYPE. 03/07/24 NATIVE PLANT INVENTORY NATIVE PLANT INVENTORY NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLAN GATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVE A PORTION OF THE S.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, G.&S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA 2203155, 2301138, 2301232 CASE #2301236 I:\PROJECTS\CCD-15\AUTOCAD\WORKING DRAWINGS\CCD-15_NPPO.DWG, 03/07/2024, 11:03 AM, KENDRA POTTERPROJECT: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS/SUBMITTALS DATE# OF CASE NO: REFERENCE: CALL TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG 602-263-1100 1-800-STAKE-IT (OUTSIDE MARICOPA COUNTY) F O R A G E N C Y R E V I E W A N D A P P R O V A L O N L Y . N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N . N O T F O R B I D D I N G THE USE OF PLANS PREPARED BY THE PLANNING CENTER SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE ORIGINAL SITE FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED AND PUBLICATION THEREOF IS LIMITED TO SUCH USE. REPRODUCTION, PUBLICATION OR RE-USE BY ANY METHOD, IN WHOLE OR PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS PROHIBITED. TITLE TO THESE CONCEPTS AND PLANSREMAIN WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WITHOUT PREJUDICE. VISUAL CONTACT WITH THE PLANS SHALL CONSTITUTE PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF THESE RESTRICTIONS. THE DRAWINGS OR CONCEPTS SHALL NOT BE USED IN PART OR IN WHOLE FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT JUST COMPENSATION AND PERMISSION FROM THE PLANNING CENTER.THE PL GCEANNNIN ERT a d i v i i Isooonf nTPCGrup,c. e scr conegtetu osn az 857012600 520.623.6146 520.622.1950 azplanningcenter.comss CCD-15 03/07/24 KDP DB N-5 10 33 DANIEL A. BRADSHAW 58092 E X PIRES 0 6 /3 0 /26NUMBER BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIG. VEG. HEIGHT (FT) CALIPER (IN)TRUNK VIABILITY TRANSPLANT TAG TREATMENT ARMS REASONS 114 ACACIA CONSTRICTA WHITETHORN ACACIA NO 9 0 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 POOR FORM LOW BRANCHING 122 ACACIA CONSTRICTA WHITETHORN ACACIA NO 14 6 MULTI MEDIUM LOW BLUE TOS 0 LARGE SIZE DEAD LIMB 123 ACACIA CONSTRICTA WHITETHORN ACACIA NO 13 6 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DAMAGED DIEBACK 129 ACACIA CONSTRICTA WHITETHORN ACACIA NO 10 0 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DIEBACK .in rocks 142 ACACIA CONSTRICTA WHITETHORN ACACIA NO 6 3 MULTI LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DIEBACK DAMAGED 226 ACACIA CONSTRICTA WHITETHORN ACACIA NO 12 7 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 LOW BRANCHING DEAD LIMB 227 ACACIA CONSTRICTA WHITETHORN ACACIA NO 14 10 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 LOW BRANCHING DIEBACK 230 ACACIA CONSTRICTA WHITETHORN ACACIA NO 10 5 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 REGROWTH POOR FORM 265 ACACIA CONSTRICTA WHITETHORN ACACIA NO 10 3 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 SOILS SANDY BAD BASE 326 ACACIA CONSTRICTA WHITETHORN ACACIA NO 13 7 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 SOILS SANDY SLOPE on bank 120 ACACIA GREGGII CATCLAW ACACIA NO 5 5 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 INTERFERENCE SOILS ROCKY 121 ACACIA GREGGII CATCLAW ACACIA NO 4 3 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 LOW BRANCHING WIDE BASE 151 ACACIA GREGGII CATCLAW ACACIA NO 6 3 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 WIDE BASE LOW BRANCHING 152 ACACIA GREGGII CATCLAW ACACIA NO 6 7 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DAMAGED LOW BRANCHING 155 ACACIA GREGGII CATCLAW ACACIA NO 4 3 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 POOR FORM . 213 ACACIA GREGGII CATCLAW ACACIA NO 11 6 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DAMAGED LOW BRANCHING 225 ACACIA GREGGII CATCLAW ACACIA NO 6 4 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 BROKEN LIMB WIDE BASE 249 ACACIA GREGGII CATCLAW ACACIA NO 9 5 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 POOR FORM LOW BRANCHING 250 ACACIA GREGGII CATCLAW ACACIA NO 5 4 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 POOR FORM LOW BRANCHING 253 ACACIA GREGGII CATCLAW ACACIA NO 8 6 MULTI HIGH LOW BLUE TOS 0 POOR FORM LOW BRANCHING 259 ACACIA GREGGII CATCLAW ACACIA NO 12 7 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 INTERFERENCE SOILS ROCKY growing in rock 263 ACACIA GREGGII CATCLAW ACACIA NO 8 5 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW PIP 0 SOILS ROCKY POOR FORM 269 ACACIA GREGGII CATCLAW ACACIA NO 9 4 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW PIP 0 SOILS SANDY WIDE BASE 273 ACACIA GREGGII CATCLAW ACACIA NO 12 4 MULTI LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DEAD LIMB DEAD TRUNK 274 ACACIA GREGGII CATCLAW ACACIA NO 6 4 MULTI LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 LOW BRANCHING MISTLETOE 282 ACACIA GREGGII CATCLAW ACACIA NO 9 6 MULTI LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DEAD TRUNK LOW BRANCHING 310 ACACIA GREGGII CATCLAW ACACIA NO 12 4 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DAMAGED DIEBACK 329 ACACIA GREGGII CATCLAW ACACIA NO 10 5 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 SOILS ROCKY LOW BRANCHING die back 337 ACACIA GREGGII CATCLAW ACACIA NO 5 4 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 LOW BRANCHING SOILS SANDY poor form 611 ACACIA GREGGII CATCLAW ACACIA YES 15 12 MULTI HIGH LOW YELLOW RFS 0 NOT SALVAGEABLE LG SIZE/POOR SOIL CONDITIONS 615 ACACIA GREGGII CATCLAW ACACIA YES 16 14 MULTI HIGH LOW YELLOW RFS 0 NOT SALVAGEABLE LG SIZE/POOR SOIL CONDITIONS 620 ACACIA GREGGII CATCLAW ACACIA YES 18 15 MULTI HIGH LOW YELLOW RFS 0 NOT SALVAGEABLE LG SIZE/POOR SOIL CONDITIONS 105 CARNEGIEA GIGANTEA SAGUARO NO 11 0 SINGLE MEDIUM LOW BLUE TOS 0 YELLOWING SOILS ROCKY in rocks tag in tree 106 CARNEGIEA GIGANTEA SAGUARO NO 2 0 SINGLE HIGH MEDIUM BLUE TOS 0 SOILS ROCKY . 107 CARNEGIEA GIGANTEA SAGUARO NO 2 0 SINGLE HIGH MEDIUM BLUE TOS 0 SOILS ROCKY INTERFERENCE 113 CARNEGIEA GIGANTEA SAGUARO NO 3 0 SINGLE HIGH LOW BLUE TOS 0 SOILS ROCKY . *118 CARNEGIEA GIGANTEA SAGUARO NO 12 0 SINGLE HIGH LOW BLUE TOS 0 SOILS ROCKY . 124 CARNEGIEA GIGANTEA SAGUARO NO 9 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 125 CARNEGIEA GIGANTEA SAGUARO NO 3 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 204 CARNEGIEA GIGANTEA SAGUARO NO 11 0 SINGLE MEDIUM MEDIUM BLUE TOS 0 YELLOWING . 205 CARNEGIEA GIGANTEA SAGUARO NO 20 0 SINGLE LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 4 BAD BASE YELLOWING split near bottom 206 CARNEGIEA GIGANTEA SAGUARO NO 18 0 SINGLE MEDIUM MEDIUM BLUE TOS 2 LARGE SIZE OLD 220 CARNEGIEA GIGANTEA SAGUARO NO 7 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 228 CARNEGIEA GIGANTEA SAGUARO NO 4 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 246 CARNEGIEA GIGANTEA SAGUARO NO 1 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 ..tag in tree 312 CARNEGIEA GIGANTEA SAGUARO NO 2 0 SINGLE HIGH MEDIUM BLUE TOS 0 SOILS ROCKY .tag in tree 323 CARNEGIEA GIGANTEA SAGUARO NO 8 0 SINGLE HIGH MEDIUM BLUE TOS 0 .SLOPE flag in tree 219 CELTIS PALLIDA DESERT HACKBERRY NO 10 0 MULTI HIGH LOW YELLOW RFS 0 LARGE SIZE . 275 CELTIS PALLIDA DESERT HACKBERRY NO 10 0 MULTI HIGH LOW YELLOW RFS 0 WIDE BASE . 278 CELTIS PALLIDA DESERT HACKBERRY NO 9 0 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 .DIEBACK on wash bank 281 CELTIS PALLIDA DESERT HACKBERRY NO 7 0 SINGLE HIGH LOW BLUE TOS 0 LARGE SIZE . 285 CELTIS PALLIDA DESERT HACKBERRY NO 7 0 MULTI HIGH LOW YELLOW RFS 0 LOW BRANCHING WIDE BASE 243 CERCIDIUM FLORIDUM BLUE PALO VERDE NO 9 5 MULTI MEDIUM MEDIUM BLUE TOS 0 ..bark scale 268 CERCIDIUM FLORIDUM BLUE PALO VERDE NO 8 6 MULTI LOW LOW YELLOW PIP 0 SOILS ROCKY IN DECLINE 617 CERCIDIUM FLORIDUM BLUE PALO VERDE YES 16 14 MULTI HIGH LOW YELLOW RFS 0 NOT SALVAGEABLE LG SIZE/POOR SOIL CONDITIONS 100 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 8 3 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 INTERFERENCE LOW BRANCHING 102 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 7 3 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 LOW BRANCHING INTERFERENCE 103 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 13 11 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DIEBACK LOW BRANCHING 104 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 14 9 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DIEBACK SOILS ROCKY in rocks 108 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 10 0 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 INTERFERENCE DIEBACK in rocks 109 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 8 5 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DIEBACK LOW BRANCHING 110 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 7 5 MULTI LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DIEBACK DEAD LIMB 118 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 9 8 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 LOW BRANCHING SOILS ROCKY 126 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 8 8 MULTI LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DIEBACK BROKEN LIMB 127 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 0 0 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DIEBACK IN DECLINE in rocks 131 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 7 5 SINGLE MEDIUM MEDIUM BLUE TOS 0 SOILS SANDY . 134 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 7 8 MULTI LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DEAD TRUNK REGROWTH 141 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 9 8 MULTI HIGH LOW YELLOW RFS 0 POOR FORM WIDE BASE 143 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 9 5 SINGLE HIGH MEDIUM BLUE TOS 0 .. 144 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 13 15 MULTI LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 YELLOWING DIEBACK 146 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 14 8 MULTI MEDIUM LOW BLUE TOS 0 DIEBACK WIDE BASE 154 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 8 7 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DIEBACK LOW BRANCHING 178 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 7 5 MULTI LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DAMAGED BAD BASE 181 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 11 5 MULTI LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DIEBACK DEAD LIMB 183 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 10 6 MULTI HIGH LOW YELLOW RFS 0 POOR FORM LOW BRANCHING NUMBER BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIG. VEG. HEIGHT (FT) CALIPER (IN)TRUNK VIABILITY TRANSPLANT TAG TREATMENT ARMS REASONS 189 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 9 4 MULTI MEDIUM HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 199 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 9 8 MULTI LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DIEBACK YELLOWING 216 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 9 5 SINGLE MEDIUM MEDIUM BLUE TOS 0 .. 234 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 10 4 MULTI HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 238 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 9 3 MULTI MEDIUM HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 241 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 9 4 MULTI HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 242 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 9 3 MULTI MEDIUM HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 247 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 13 4 MULTI MEDIUM LOW BLUE TOS 0 WIDE BASE . 248 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 10 4 MULTI HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 254 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 9 4 MULTI MEDIUM MEDIUM YELLOW RFS 0 DAMAGED . 256 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 12 5 MULTI LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DIEBACK INTERFERENCE 257 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 10 4 MULTI LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DIEBACK YELLOWING 258 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 12 6 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 INTERFERENCE YELLOWING 2 smaller trees intertwined 261 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 9 5 MULTI MEDIUM LOW BLUE TOS 0 SOILS ROCKY . 270 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 12 8 MULTI LOW LOW YELLOW PIP 0 DEAD LIMB DIEBACK 286 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 8 5 MULTI LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DEAD LIMB IN DECLINE in rock 287 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 9 11 MULTI LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DEAD TRUNK DEAD LIMB in rock 288 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 7 3 MULTI LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DIEBACK DEAD LIMB in rock 289 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 7 3 MULTI LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DIEBACK IN DECLINE in rock 290 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 12 6 MULTI LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DIEBACK DEAD LIMB in rock 295 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 13 9 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DIEBACK IN DECLINE dieback 296 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 8 3 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DIEBACK SOILS SANDY 299 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 11 8 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DEAD LIMB IN DECLINE 300 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 8 3 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 YELLOWING IN DECLINE 302 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 10 5 MULTI LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 BAD BASE DEAD LIMB bug damage 303 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 7 3 MULTI LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 IN DECLINE DEAD LIMB 304 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 7 3 MULTI LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 IN DECLINE DIEBACK 305 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 9 3 MULTI LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 BAD BASE DEAD LIMB 306 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 8 4 MULTI LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DEAD TRUNK DEAD LIMB 307 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 12 3 MULTI LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DEAD TRUNK DEAD LIMB root runner 308 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 10 3 MULTI LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DIEBACK DEAD LIMB 312 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 11 19 SINGLE LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DEAD LIMB DIEBACK leaning 314 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 12 4 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DEAD LIMB DIEBACK root sucker 317 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 12 9 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 LOW BRANCHING DIEBACK 319 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 9 3 MULTI LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 IN DECLINE LOW BRANCHING 334 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 6 3 MULTI LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DIEBACK BAD BASE in rocks 335 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 8 6 MULTI LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DEAD TRUNK BAD BASE in rocks 336 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 10 5 MULTI LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DIEBACK IN DECLINE rats nest 339 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 8 6 MULTI LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 IN DECLINE DEAD TRUNK 341 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 10 5 MULTI LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DEAD TRUNK DIEBACK 342 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 8 3 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 INTERFERENCE DIEBACK rocky soils 342 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 10 10 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 INTERFERENCE DIEBACK form 344 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 9 9 MULTI LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DEAD TRUNK DIEBACK interference 345 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 7 4 MULTI LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 POOR FORM DIEBACK root sucker 346 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 11 15 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DIEBACK WIDE BASE 347 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 11 13 MULTI LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DEAD TRUNK WIDE BASE 348 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 11 9 MULTI LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DEAD TRUNK WIDE BASE 349 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 11 16 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DEAD TRUNK WIDE BASE 350 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 9 10 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DIEBACK WIDE BASE split trunk 352 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 6 5 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 POOR FORM .sideways growth 353 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 7 4 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 POOR FORM .sideways growth root sucker 354 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 6 0 MULTI LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 POOR FORM .sideways growth root sucker 355 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE NO 10 4 MULTI MEDIUM MEDIUM YELLOW RFS 0 INTERFERENCE . 605 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE YES 15 12 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DEAD TRUNK DEAD LIMB 607 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE YES 12 12 MULTI HIGH LOW YELLOW RFS 0 NOT SALVAGEABLE LG SIZE/POOR SOIL CONDITIONS 608 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE YES 12 12 MULTI HIGH LOW YELLOW RFS 0 NOT SALVAGEABLE LG SIZE/POOR SOIL CONDITIONS 609 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE YES 12 16 MULTI LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DEAD TRUNK DEAD LIMB 610 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE YES 14 12 MULTI LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DEAD TRUNK DEAD LIMB 612 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE YES 16 15 MULTI HIGH LOW YELLOW RFS 0 NOT SALVAGEABLE LG SIZE/POOR SOIL CONDITIONS 613 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE YES 17 14 MULTI HIGH LOW YELLOW RFS 0 NOT SALVAGEABLE LG SIZE/POOR SOIL CONDITIONS 614 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE YES 15 14 MULTI HIGH LOW YELLOW RFS 0 NOT SALVAGEABLE LG SIZE/POOR SOIL CONDITIONS 616 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE YES 15 14 MULTI HIGH LOW YELLOW RFS 0 NOT SALVAGEABLE LG SIZE/POOR SOIL CONDITIONS 619 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE YES 15 20 SINGLE LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DEAD TRUNK DEAD LIMB 621 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE YES 14 12 MULTI HIGH LOW YELLOW RFS 0 NOT SALVAGEABLE LG SIZE/POOR SOIL CONDITIONS S102 CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE YES 18 30 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DIEBACK BAD BASE 111 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 1 0 SINGLE LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DIEBACK . 112 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 1 0 SINGLE LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 YELLOWING . 115 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 1 0 MULTI HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 116 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 1 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 117 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 1 0 SINGLE LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DIEBACK SOILS ROCKY 03/07/24 NATIVE PLANT INVENTORY NATIVE PLANT INVENTORY NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLAN GATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVE A PORTION OF THE S.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, G.&S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA 2203155, 2301138, 2301232 CASE #2301236 I:\PROJECTS\CCD-15\AUTOCAD\WORKING DRAWINGS\CCD-15_NPPO.DWG, 03/07/2024, 11:03 AM, KENDRA POTTERPROJECT: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS/SUBMITTALS DATE# OF CASE NO: REFERENCE: CALL TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG 602-263-1100 1-800-STAKE-IT (OUTSIDE MARICOPA COUNTY) F O R A G E N C Y R E V I E W A N D A P P R O V A L O N L Y . N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N . N O T F O R B I D D I N G THE USE OF PLANS PREPARED BY THE PLANNING CENTER SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE ORIGINAL SITE FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED AND PUBLICATION THEREOF IS LIMITED TO SUCH USE. REPRODUCTION, PUBLICATION OR RE-USE BY ANY METHOD, IN WHOLE OR PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS PROHIBITED. TITLE TO THESE CONCEPTS AND PLANSREMAIN WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WITHOUT PREJUDICE. VISUAL CONTACT WITH THE PLANS SHALL CONSTITUTE PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF THESE RESTRICTIONS. THE DRAWINGS OR CONCEPTS SHALL NOT BE USED IN PART OR IN WHOLE FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT JUST COMPENSATION AND PERMISSION FROM THE PLANNING CENTER.THE PL GCEANNNIN ERT a d i v i i Isooonf nTPCGrup,c. e scr conegtetu osn az 857012600 520.623.6146 520.622.1950 azplanningcenter.comss CCD-15 03/07/24 KDP DB N-6 11 33 DANIEL A. BRADSHAW 58092 E X PIRES 0 6 /3 0 /262 smaller trees intertwined in rock in rock in rock in rock in rock dieback bug damage root runner leaning root sucker in rocks in rocks rats nest rocky soils form interference root sucker split trunk sideways growth sideways growth root sucker sideways growth root sucker NUMBER BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIG. VEG. HEIGHT (FT) CALIPER (IN)TRUNK VIABILITY TRANSPLANT TAG TREATMENT ARMS REASONS 115 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 1 0 MULTI HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 116 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 1 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 117 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 1 0 SINGLE LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DIEBACK SOILS ROCKY 128 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 1 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 130 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 2 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 133 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 1 0 SINGLE MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 INTERFERENCE . 135 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 3 0 SINGLE LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 IN DECLINE YELLOWING 136 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 1 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 137 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 1 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 138 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 2 0 SINGLE LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 IN DECLINE YELLOWING 140 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 1 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 145 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 3 0 SINGLE LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 YELLOWING . 147 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 2 0 SINGLE LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 IN DECLINE YELLOWING 148 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 1 0 SINGLE MEDIUM HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 149 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 3 0 SINGLE LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 YELLOWING IN DECLINE 150 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 3 0 SINGLE LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 IN DECLINE BAD BASE 153 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 3 0 SINGLE MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 BAD BASE YELLOWING 157 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 1 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 161 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 0 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 162 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 1 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 163 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 2 0 SINGLE MEDIUM MEDIUM YELLOW RFS 0 YELLOWING . 165 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 1 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 167 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 2 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 168 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 2 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 170 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 1 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 171 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 2 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 172 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 1 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 174 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 1 0 SINGLE MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 BAD BASE YELLOWING 176 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 2 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 179 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 1 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 185 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 1 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 186 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 0 0 SINGLE LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DAMAGED BAD BASE 190 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 1 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 191 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 1 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 192 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 3 0 SINGLE LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 IN DECLINE YELLOWING 194 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 1 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 195 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 1 0 MULTI LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 IN DECLINE YELLOWING double 196 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 1 0 MULTI HIGH MEDIUM BLUE TOS 0 ..triple 197 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 2 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 200 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 3 0 SINGLE MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 IN DECLINE . 214 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 1 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 217 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 3 0 SINGLE MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 YELLOWING . 218 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 2 0 MULTI HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 221 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 2 0 SINGLE MEDIUM MEDIUM BLUE TOS 0 .. 223 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 3 0 SINGLE MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 IN DECLINE . 229 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 2 0 SINGLE MEDIUM HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 231 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 1 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 232 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 2 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 236 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 1 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 237 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 1 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 239 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 1 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 240 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 2 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 244 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 2 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 245 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 2 0 MULTI HIGH MEDIUM BLUE TOS 0 ..double 251 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 2 0 SINGLE HIGH LOW YELLOW RFS 0 INTERFERENCE .tag in tree. barrel in tree 252 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 2 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 255 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 1 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 260 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 1 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 ..tag in tree 262 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 1 0 SINGLE HIGH MEDIUM BLUE TOS 0 SOILS ROCKY . 280 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 1 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 284 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 2 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 291 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 2 0 SINGLE HIGH LOW YELLOW RFS 0 ..in rock 292 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 1 0 SINGLE HIGH LOW YELLOW RFS 0 ..in rock 293 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 2 0 MULTI MEDIUM MEDIUM YELLOW RFS 0 .YELLOWING in rock 293 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 2 0 MULTI HIGH MEDIUM YELLOW RFS 0 .SOILS ROCKY double 301 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 1 0 SINGLE MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 YELLOWING .bug damage 309 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 1 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 311 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 2 0 SINGLE HIGH MEDIUM BLUE TOS 0 SOILS ROCKY DIEBACK 315 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 2 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 316 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 2 0 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 ..triple broken top 318 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 1 0 SINGLE HIGH MEDIUM BLUE TOS 0 SOILS ROCKY . 321 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 2 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. NUMBER BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIG. VEG. HEIGHT (FT) CALIPER (IN)TRUNK VIABILITY TRANSPLANT TAG TREATMENT ARMS REASONS 324 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 1 0 SINGLE HIGH MEDIUM BLUE TOS 0 .SLOPE 325 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 0 0 SINGLE HIGH MEDIUM BLUE TOS 0 .SLOPE 326 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 2 0 SINGLE MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 SOILS ROCKY BAD BASE rat nest 328 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 3 0 MULTI LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 SOILS ROCKY BAD BASE double 332 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 2 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 333 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 1 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 336 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 1 0 SINGLE MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 ..in rocks 351 FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL NO 2 0 SINGLE MEDIUM MEDIUM BLUE TOS 0 LARGE SIZE . 139 FOUQUIERIA SPLENDENS OCOTILLO NO 14 0 MULTI HIGH MEDIUM BLUE TOS 0 ..20 +- canes 156 FOUQUIERIA SPLENDENS OCOTILLO NO 7 0 SINGLE LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 ..10 canes in rat nest 158 FOUQUIERIA SPLENDENS OCOTILLO NO 10 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 ..15 +- canes 159 FOUQUIERIA SPLENDENS OCOTILLO NO 10 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 ..10 +-canes 160 FOUQUIERIA SPLENDENS OCOTILLO NO 12 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 ..15+- canes 164 FOUQUIERIA SPLENDENS OCOTILLO NO 7 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 ..7 +- canes 100 FOUQUIERIA SPLENDENS OCOTILLO NO 13 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 ..25+- canes 169 FOUQUIERIA SPLENDENS OCOTILLO NO 11 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 ..20 +- canes 173 FOUQUIERIA SPLENDENS OCOTILLO NO 6 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 ..10+- canes 175 FOUQUIERIA SPLENDENS OCOTILLO NO 7 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 ..15+- canes 177 FOUQUIERIA SPLENDENS OCOTILLO NO 17 0 SINGLE MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 IN DECLINE LARGE SIZE 182 FOUQUIERIA SPLENDENS OCOTILLO NO 11 0 SINGLE HIGH MEDIUM BLUE TOS 0 INTERFERENCE . 184 FOUQUIERIA SPLENDENS OCOTILLO NO 7 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 ..10 +- canes 187 FOUQUIERIA SPLENDENS OCOTILLO NO 13 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 ..10+- canes 188 FOUQUIERIA SPLENDENS OCOTILLO NO 12 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 ..10+- canes 193 FOUQUIERIA SPLENDENS OCOTILLO NO 11 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 ..20 +- canes 198 FOUQUIERIA SPLENDENS OCOTILLO NO 5 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 ..10 +- canes 201 OLNEYA TESOTA IRONWOOD NO 13 9 SINGLE HIGH MEDIUM BLUE TOS 0 .. 202 OLNEYA TESOTA IRONWOOD NO 16 12 SINGLE MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DIEBACK OLD 203 OLNEYA TESOTA IRONWOOD NO 15 8 SINGLE HIGH MEDIUM BLUE TOS 0 LARGE SIZE . 207 OLNEYA TESOTA IRONWOOD NO 20 18 MULTI HIGH LOW YELLOW RFS 0 LARGE SIZE . 208 OLNEYA TESOTA IRONWOOD NO 18 9 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DIEBACK LARGE SIZE 209 OLNEYA TESOTA IRONWOOD NO 25 20 SINGLE MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DIEBACK LARGE SIZE 210 OLNEYA TESOTA IRONWOOD NO 25 30 MULTI HIGH LOW YELLOW RFS 0 LARGE SIZE . 211 OLNEYA TESOTA IRONWOOD NO 25 30 MULTI HIGH LOW YELLOW RFS 0 LARGE SIZE . 212 OLNEYA TESOTA IRONWOOD NO 19 16 SINGLE HIGH LOW YELLOW RFS 0 LARGE SIZE . 180 PROSOPIS VELUTINA VELVET MESQUITE NO 14 12 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 MISTLETOE DAMAGED 215 PROSOPIS VELUTINA VELVET MESQUITE NO 12 5 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 ..perfect tree 100 PROSOPIS VELUTINA VELVET MESQUITE NO 17 10 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 LARGE SIZE . 264 PROSOPIS VELUTINA VELVET MESQUITE NO 8 6 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW PIP 0 WIDE BASE POOR FORM 266 PROSOPIS VELUTINA VELVET MESQUITE NO 8 5 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW PIP 0 SOILS SANDY BAD BASE concrete drainage 267 PROSOPIS VELUTINA VELVET MESQUITE NO 7 4 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW PIP 0 SOILS SANDY BAD BASE concrete drainage 271 PROSOPIS VELUTINA VELVET MESQUITE NO 14 11 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DEAD LIMB SOILS SANDY wash bank 272 PROSOPIS VELUTINA VELVET MESQUITE NO 11 14 MULTI LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DEAD LIMB DEAD LIMB wash bank 276 PROSOPIS VELUTINA VELVET MESQUITE NO 13 9 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 WIDE BASE DIEBACK on wash bank 277 PROSOPIS VELUTINA VELVET MESQUITE NO 11 11 SINGLE MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DEAD LIMB DIEBACK on wash bank 279 PROSOPIS VELUTINA VELVET MESQUITE NO 14 8 SINGLE MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 LARGE SIZE DIEBACK on wash bank 283 PROSOPIS VELUTINA VELVET MESQUITE NO 12 8 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DIEBACK LOW BRANCHING 297 PROSOPIS VELUTINA VELVET MESQUITE NO 12 10 SINGLE LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DEAD LIMB POOR FORM 298 PROSOPIS VELUTINA VELVET MESQUITE NO 9 9 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW PIP 0 DEAD LIMB WIDE BASE 320 PROSOPIS VELUTINA VELVET MESQUITE NO 13 6 MULTI HIGH LOW YELLOW RFS 0 SOILS SANDY .on wash bank 322 PROSOPIS VELUTINA VELVET MESQUITE NO 12 4 SINGLE MEDIUM LOW BLUE TOS 0 SOILS SANDY MISTLETOE interference 340 PROSOPIS VELUTINA VELVET MESQUITE NO 11 10 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 WIDE BASE DIEBACK loose soil 522 PROSOPIS VELUTINA VELVET MESQUITE YES 12 14 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW PIP 0 NOT SALVAGEABLE LG SIZE/POOR SOIL CONDITIONS 606 PROSOPIS VELUTINA VELVET MESQUITE YES 12 12 MULTI LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DIEBACK DEAD TRUNK 618 PROSOPIS VELUTINA VELVET MESQUITE YES 19 17 SINGLE HIGH LOW YELLOW RFS 0 NOT SALVAGEABLE LG SIZE/POOR SOIL CONDITIONS S101 PROSOPIS VELUTINA VELVET MESQUITE YES 12 14 MULTI LOW LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DIEBACK PRIMARY BRANCH DEAD 132 YUCCA ELATA SOAPTREE YUCCA NO 2 0 SINGLE HIGH HIGH BLUE TOS 0 .. 224 ZIZIPHUS OBTUSIFOLIA GRAYTHORN NO 9 0 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 .. 233 ZIZIPHUS OBTUSIFOLIA GRAYTHORN NO 12 0 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 .. 235 ZIZIPHUS OBTUSIFOLIA GRAYTHORN NO 7 0 MULTI MEDIUM LOW YELLOW RFS 0 DIEBACK POOR FORM 03/07/24 WWBFJBECCCCEMUMWBF WBFWBFWBF W BFW BFWBFWBFWSDSDSD295729582958295929562955295429532952WBFWBF VISTOSO GOLFCASITASHIGH DENSITYRESIDENTIALOPEN SPACERECREATIONRECREATIONVISTOSO HIGHLANDSNEIGHBORHOODOPEN SPACEVISTOSO HIGHLANDSNEIGHBORHOODMEDIUM HIGH DENSITYRESIDENTIAL219-19-4980HIGH DENSITYRESIDENTIAL OPENSPACE219-19-4690219-19-0930219-19-1260STONE VILLAGENEIGHBORHOODMEDIUM DENSITYRESIDENTIAL219-19-182A219-19-1150219-19-1140219-19-1120219-19-1110219-19-182A219-19-1270219-19-1890219-19-252A219-19-1950NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN219-19-1950NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNMANAGER265MAIL / PACKAGE272GYM266MEN278WOMEN277CLUB273LEASING274HALLWAY268OFFICE291POOL EQP292NNNNNNNNNNNN48" BOX48" BOX48" BOX36" BOX36" BOX36" BOX48" BOX36" BOX36" BOX36" BOX36" BOX36" BOX36" BOX36" BOX36" BOX36" BOX36" BOX36" BOX36" BOX36" BOX48" BOX48" BOX48" BOX48" BOX48" BOX48" BOX48" BOX48" BOX48" BOX48" BOX48" BOX48" BOX36" BOX48" BOX48" BOX48" BOX36" BOXNN36" BOX36" BOXPLANNING & ZONING ADMINISTRATORNORTH0'40'80'160'SCALE: 1"=80'DATELANDSCAPE PLANGATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVECASE #2301236THIS SHEETLS-1LS-2LS-3LS-4LD-1R-1R-2R-3R-4R-5R-6R-7R-8R-9R-10HD-1HD-2HD-3HD-4HD-5HD-6COVERLANDSCAPE PLANLANDSCAPE PLANLANDSCAPE PLANLANDSCAPE NOTESLANDSCAPE DETAILSRECREATION AREA & HARDSCAPE PLANRECREATION AREA & HARDSCAPE PLAN NOTESRECREATION AREA & HARDSCAPE PLANRECREATION AREA & HARDSCAPE PLANRECREATION AREA & HARDSCAPE PLANREC & HS PLAN RECREATION AREA #1REC & HS PLAN RECREATION AREAS #2 & #3REC & HS PLAN RECREATION AREA #4HARDSCAPE & GROUNDCOVERWALL PLANHARDSCAPE DETAILSHARDSCAPE DETAILSHARDSCAPE DETAILSHARDSCAPE DETAILSHARDSCAPE DETAILSHARDSCAPE DETAILSSHEET INDEX:SUBMITTAL HISTORY:TOWN OF ORO VALLEYLANDSCAPE PLANGATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVEA PORTION OF THE S.E. 1/4 OF SECTION23, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST,G.&S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMACOUNTY, ARIZONA2203155,2301138,2301232CASE#2301236I:\PROJECTS\CCD-15\AUTOCAD\WORKING DRAWINGS\CCD-15_LS 2.DWG, 03/07/2024, 11:04 AM, KENDRA POTTERPROJECT:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:DATE:REVISIONS/SUBMITTALSDATE# OF CASE NO:REFERENCE:CALL TWO WORKINGDAYS BEFORE YOU DIG602-263-11001-800-STAKE-IT(OUTSIDEMARICOPA COUNTY)FOR AGENCY REVIEW AND APPROVAL ONLY. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION. NOT FOR BIDDINGTHE USE OF PLANS PREPARED BY THE PLANNING CENTER SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE ORIGINAL SITE FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED AND PUBLICATION THEREOF IS LIMITED TO SUCH USE. REPRODUCTION, PUBLICATION OR RE-USE BY ANY METHOD, IN WHOLE OR PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS PROHIBITED. TITLE TO THESE CONCEPTS AND PLANS R E M A I N W I T H T H E L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T W I T H O U T P R E J U D I C E . V I S U A L C O N T A C T W I T H T H E P L A N S S H A L L C O N S T I T U T E P R I M A F A C I E E V I D E N C E O F T H E A C C E P T A N C E O F T H E S E R E S T R I C T I O N S . T H E D R A W I N G S O R C O N C E P T S S H A L L N O T B E U S E D I N P A R T O R I N W H O L E F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N W I T H O U T J U S T C O M P E N S A T I O N A N D P E R M I S S I O N F R O M T H E P L A N N I N G C E N T E R .THEPLGCEANNNINERTadiviiIsooonfnTPCGrup,c.escrconegtetuosnaz857012600520.623.6146520.622.1950azplanningcenter.comssCCD-1503/07/24KDPDBLS-01233DANIEL A.BRADSHAW58092EXPIRES 06/30/ 2 603/07/24SCALE: 3" = 1 MILENORTHLOCATION MAPCTRL PTN W2 SE4 2.94 AC SEC 23-11-13;CTRL PTN SE4 6.07 AC SEC 23-11-13 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONAHighlandsVistosoDr.Vistoso Blvd.Rancho2324262522232726SHEET LS-1STONE VILLAGEVISTOSO HIGHLANDSSUMMIT NORTH ATCENTER POINTEFAIRFIELDDISCOVERYWORLDMARKSTONEGATESTONE CANYON PHASE 1STREET OF DREAMSOPEN SPACEHIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIALMEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIALMEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIALRECREATION AREA/GOLF COURSELOW DENSITY RESIDENTIALSTONE CANYON PHASE XSIENAPINNACLE ATCENTER POINTEDESERT CREST ATCENTER POINTEZONINGNEIGHBORHOODSSTEPROCK CANYON PLACEM&P (PRIVATE)BOWCR E E K S P R I N G S P L A C E M&P (PRI V A T E )VISTOSO HIGHLANDS DRIVEM&P (PUBLIC)SHEET LS-2SHEET LS-3LEGENDWash2' Contour IntervalParcelsProject BoundaryPROJECTBOUNDARYMATCHLINE12345611111111666666644552233333355SVVHSNFDWSGSDSXSXSIPDCSCVHSDSGSNDCSIFSVPHIGHLANDSWASHTHISPROJECTDATETOWN ENGINEER(FOR LANDSCAPE PROPOSED WITHIN PUBLIC ROW)15'BUFFERYARD "A"(15' WIDE)TRAILCONNECTIONOWNER/DEVELOPER:OV 132, LLC6340 N. CAMPBELL AV., SUITE 170TUCSON, AZ 85718ATTN: ROSS RULNEYPH: (520) 850-9300E: rossrulney@gmail.comARCHITECT:a23 STUDIOS711 EAST 9TH STREEETTUCSON, AZ 85719ATTN: MR. BURAK BEKATPH: (520) 903-2323E: info@a23studios.comENGINEER:RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY3945 E. FORT LOWELL RD., SUITE 111TUCSON, AZ 85712ATTN: KEVIN HALLPH: (520) 795-1000khall@rickengineering.comLANDSCAPE INRIGHT-OF-WAYLIMITS OFGRADINGNOTE: HYDROSEED TO BE APPLIED IN DISTURBEDOPEN SPACE ON SOUTH & WEST SIDE OF PROPERTY.06/02/231ST SUBMITTALBUFFERYARD / PARKING AREALENGTH(SF) OR#SPACESTREESSHRUBSACCENTS / CACTI15FT BUFFERYARD "A" RESIDENTIALSTREET FRONTAGE865 LFREQUIRED (4 PER 100LF): 35PROVIDED: 40REQUIRED (4 PER 100LF): 35PROVIDED: 42REQUIRED (8 PER 100LF): 70PROVIDED: 71PARKING258 SPCREQUIRED (1 PER 9 SPACES): 29PROVIDED: 44REQUIRED: N/APROVIDED: (SEE PLANS)REQUIRED: N/APROVIDED: (SEE PLANS)BUFFERYARD & PARKINGGENERAL NOTES:1.Gross area of development in acres: 9.77 AC (including 3.0 AC offsite work)2.Total acres of graded area: 9.77 AC3.Total acres of undisturbed area: 04.Total amount of open space required and provided (as defined in Chapter 31Definitions) Open Space Required: 30% of the gross area of the siteOpen Space Provided: 37.7% (including landscape common areas; excludingtrailhead use area) Total amount of Landscaped Common Areas: 99,952 SF.5.Landscape Bufferyard "A" Residential Street Frontage along Vistoso Highlands Dr.(Minimum 15 ft.) Landscaped buffer yards appropriately labeled per OVZCR Table27.7.6.The existing zoning for A.P.N. 219-19-1910 is Rancho Vistoso PAD 'HDR.' (See PADdocument dated June 22, 1987 Ordinance # (O) 06-02 (latest amendment.) Theexisting zoning for A.P.N. 219-19-1840 is RV PAD 'Open Space.' The proposedzoning for A.P.N. 219-19-1840 is RV PAD 'Recreation Area/Golf Course.' (See Sheet2 civil notes for 'Rezoning Conditions.'7.Classification of each perimeter street abutting the property and type and width ofstreet buffer yards provided.8.Landscape to conform to Oro Valley Landscape Code.9.Mitigation of surveyed plants in the Native Plant Preservation Plan will be incorporatedin the landscape design.10.Assurances for landscaping and re-vegetation bonds must be posted prior to issuanceof grading permits. A landscape bond in the amount of 10% of the original landscapebond shall remain in place for a period of one year from the complete installation oflandscape materials and any replacement materials.11.Property owner shall maintain buffer yard plantings to ensure unobstructed visibility tomotorists. All shrubs, accents, and groundcovers shall not exceed thirty (30") inches inheight within site visibility triangles. Trees within site visibility triangles will bemaintained to ensure that branches/foliage is not below a height of six (6') feet andthe diameter should not exceed 1-foot when fully mature.12.Property owners, lessees, and occupants shall maintain required landscape, irrigation,buffering, screening, and rainwater harvesting system improvements per the approvedplans.13.In the event of abandonment of the site after grading/disturbance of natural areas,disturbed areas shall be re-vegetated with a non-irrigated hydro seed mix from theOVZCR Addendum D: Approved revegetation seed mix.14.All plant material shall meet the minimum standards contained in the current editionsof the Arizona Nursery Association's Growers Committee Recommended TreeSpecifications and the American Association of Nurserymen as to size, condition, andappearance.15.Property owner is responsible for maintaining the temporary irrigation system as longas necessary in order to transition plants over to natural sources. Any plant materialsthat die in transition, for any reason, shall be replaced in accordance with Sec.27.6.E.4, Maintenance. Metered water use for landscape irrigation shall be reducedby fifty percent, five years from the date of the issuance of the certificate ofoccupancy.16.Any spaded or boxed tree transplanted on site that dies due to neglect or lack ofmaintenance shall be replaced with the same size and species of the originalsalvaged tree, as required by the salvage plan.17.The limits of grading shall be staked in the field, in accordance with Section27.6.B.7.c.ii of the Zoning Code. Disturbance outside the approved grading limits shallnot be permitted.18.No salvage of plants regulated by the Endangered Species Act and/or the ArizonaNative Plant Law may occur without the issuance of the appropriate permit by theState Department of Agriculture.19.Landscape materials shall not obstruct sight distances or vehicle turning movements.20.Landscaped areas that are susceptible to damage by pedestrian or auto traffic shallbe protected by appropriate curbs, tree guards, or other devices.21.Landscape shall be designed to minimize sediment, sand, and gravel being carriedinto the streets from storm water or other runoff.22.Landscape plan enables adequate plant spacing to ensure survivability at plantmaturity.23.Deep rooted vegetation and trees shall not be planted closer than 7.5' from a publicwater line. Exceptions for alternative design solutions such as root barriers shall beconsidered on a case-by-case basis.24.Curb-way consisting of inorganic groundcover or plants not to exceed type 2 wateruse shall be provided between curb and all sidewalks.25.All landscaped areas to be finished with a natural topping material to a depth of atleast two (2) inches.26.There are no overlay zones applicable to the property.27.Table for each buffer yard that indicates buffer yard type, width/length, and number ofrequired and provided trees, shrubs, and accent plants. (See sheet LS-0)28.The proposed development will have trails:i. All trail easements indicated are for use by the general public as permanent,non-motorized trail easements.ii. All public trails and signage must be constructed by the developer to PimaRegional Trail System Master Plan standards in consultation with the Town Parksand Recreation department. The applicable cross-section is included within theseplans.iii. Trail and sign locations, as indicated on this plan, must be field verified by Townstaff prior to construction and are subject to adjustment.iv. Trails must be positioned in a manner to avoid vegetation and minimize potentialfor erosion.v. All trails wihtin Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve shall be constructed of permeablematerial.vi. Public trail easements must be dedicated to the Town as part of the final plat. TheTown of Oro Valley shall accept ownership of the public trails and be responsiblefor all maintenance of the public trails and trail easements post development.29. For residential developments, construction of all recreational amenities and public orprivate trails within the project limits must be completed by the time 35% of buildingpermits are issued per Section 26.5 of the Zoning Code.TOWN OF ORO VALLEY2ND SUBMITTALHYDROSEEDMIXHYDROSEEDMIXUNKNOWN WASH(2,000-5,000 cfs)100 YEAR FLOODPLAINHYDROSEEDMIX100-year Floodplain100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN10/13/23LIMITS OFGRADINGLIMITS OFGRADINGLIMITS OFGRADINGLIMITS OFGRADINGLIMITS OFGRADINGLIMITS OFGRADINGTOWN OF ORO VALLEY3RD SUBMITTAL11/22/23TOWN OF ORO VALLEYTOWN OF ORO VALLEY4TH SUBMITTAL5TH SUBMITTAL01/10/24 W W BF JB C C U WBF SD 29 5 7 2958 295 8 295 9 29562 9 5 5 29 5 4 295 3 WBF N N N N N N N N N N NN N N N NN N NN N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 48" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 36" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 36" BOX N N 36" BOX 36" BOX INERT GROUNDCOVER BOULDERS: BUILDER TO USE EXISTING SITE BOULDERS. SURFACE SELECT ADDITIONAL TO SUPPLEMENT AS NEEDED. LRG SMALL (2X3) LARGE (3X4) 3/8" MINUS ROCK. MFR: KALAMAZOO MATERIALS. COLOR: PALOMINO CORAL. INSTALL AT DEPTH OF 2" MINIMUM WITH SURFACE 1" BELOW HARDSCAPE SURFACE. INSTALL IN ACCENT AREAS AND PRIVATE SEATING NOTES. (SEE LS PLANS.) MFR: KALAMAZOO MATERIALS. COLOR: APACHE ROSE. INSTALL AT DEPTH OF 2" MINIMUM WITH SURFACE 1" BELOW HARDSCAPE SURFACE. INSTALL IN BIKE PARKING SURFACE. (SEE LS PLANS.) RIGHT-OF-WAY SCREENED ROCK TO MATCH EXISTING. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY TO MATCH TYPE, SIZE, & COLOR OF EXISTING SCREENED ROCK IN RIGHT-OF-WAY. INSTALL AT DEPTH OF 2 " MINIMUM THICKNESS. INSTALL TO REFURBISH PROJECT DISTURBED RIGHT-OF-WAY LANDSCAP. INSTALL IN LANDSCAPE BUFFERYARD 15 FT WIDE STRIP ALONG OUTSIDE OF VISTOSO HIGHLANDS THEME/ACCENT WALLS. DECORATIVE RIP RAP. MFR: KALAMAZOO MATERIALS. SIZE: 2"-4". COLOR: APACHE GOLD. INSTALL AT SITE MONUMENT, AND AMENITY ACCENT AREAS (SEE LS PLANS.) DESERT COBBLE 25% MIX & HYDROSEED MIX (SEE SHEET LS-4 FOR DETAILS.) MFR: KALAMAZOO MATERIALS. SIZE & APPLICATION: 25% SURFACE COVERAGE OF DESERT COBBLE MIX WITH 100% HYDROSEEED SURFACE COVERAGE (SEE DESERT COBBLE ROCK MIX FOR TYPE, SIZE, & QUANTITY MIXTURE OF ROCK.) COLOR: SEE DESERT COBBLE ROCK MIX.APPLY IN RAINWATER HARVESTING BASINS SOUTH OF PARKING & PROJECT EAST SIDE) DESERT COBBLE ROCK MIX 100%. MFR: KALAMAZOO MATERIALS. [(40%) 3 8" MINUS ROCK. COLOR: APACHE GOLD. + (25%) 1" SCREENED ROCK COLOR: SILVERBELL APACHE GOLD. + (20%) 2" SCREENED ROCK COLOR: SILVERBELL APACHE GOLD. + (15%) 2" TO 4" RIP-RAP. COLOR: APACHE GOLD.] APPLY AT 100% COVERAGE IN COMMON AREAS & PARKING ISLANDS. (SEE LS PLANS.) SML PROJECT SITE PLANT SCHEDULE BOTANICAL NAME SIZE QTY COMMON NAME TREES WATER USE TYPE ADWR ANNUAL USE AT MATURITY (GAL) ANNUAL WATER USE (GAL) MONTHLY WATER USE (GAL) 1TOS 1 1,754 15,786 1,316 15 GAL. 2 5,702 475 1TOS 1 1,754 5,262 439 15 GAL.2 5,702 8,077 SHRUBS ACCENTS & SUCCULENTS ACACIA CONSTRICTA WHITETHORN ACACIA ACACIA GREGGII CATCLAW ACACIA CHILOPSIS LINEARIS DESERT WILLOW OLNEYA TESOTA IRONWOOD TREE PARKINSONIA FLORIDUM BLUE PALO VERDE PARKINSONIA MICROPHYLLA FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE PROSOPIS VELUTINA VELVET MESQUITE PROSOPIS GLANDULOSA HONEY MESQUITE LYSILOMA WATSONII FEATHER TREE AMBROSIA DELTOIDEA TRIANGLELEAF BURSAGE ANISACANTHUS THURBERI DESERT HONEYSUCKLE ASCLEPIAS SUBULATA DESERT MILKWEED CALLIANDRA ERIOPHYLLA NATIVE FAIRY DUSTER CELTIS PALLIDA DESERT HACKBERRY DODONEA VISCOSA GREEN HOPSEED BUSH ENCELIA FARINOSA BRITTLEBUSH LAREA TRIDENTATA CREOSOTE LEUCOPHYLLUM SPP. TEXAS RANGER ANY CULTIVAR PENSTEMON SUPERBUS SUPERB PENSTEMON SPHAERALCEA AMBIGUA DESERT GLOBE MALLOW ZIZIPHUS OBTUSIFOLIA GRAYTHORN AGAVE COLORATA MESCAL CENIZA AGAVE PARRYI VAR. HUACHUCENSIS HUACHUCA AGAVE AGAVE VICTORIAE-REGINAE QUEEN VICTORIA AGAVE CARNEGIA GIGANTEA SAGUARO DASYLIRION WHEELERI DESERT SPOON ECHINOCACTUS GRUSONII GOLDEN BARREL ECHINOCEREUS SPP. HEDGEHOG CACTUS EUPHORBIA ANTISYPHILITICA CANDELILLA FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL FOUQUIERIA SPLENDENS OCOTILLO JUSTICIA CALIFORNICA CHUPUROSA OPUNTIA ENGELMANNII LINGUIFORMIS COW'S TONGUE PRICKLY PEAR OPUNTIA MACROCENTRA BLACK SPINE PRICKLY PEAR OPUNTIA MICRODASYS 'YELLOW' YELLOW BUNNY EARS PRICKLY PEAR OPUNTIA VIOLACEA 'SANTA RITA' SANTA RITA PRICKLY PEAR PEDILANTHUS MACROCARPUS SLIPPER FLOWER YUCCA ELATA SOAPTREE YUCCA YUCCA RIGIDA BLUE TREE YUCCA 15 GAL.1 2,741 1,827 15 GAL. 1 1,754 1,754 15 GAL. 2 5,702 1,426 15 GAL.2 5,702 4,277 15 GAL.2 5,702 7,128 5 GAL.2 101 2,929 244 5 GAL.2 57 736 5 GAL.1 70 193 5 GAL.1 632 1,738 5 GAL.1 158 435 5 GAL.1 39 33 5 GAL. 5 GAL.2 101 455 5 GAL.2 25 369 5 GAL.2 25 163 5 GAL.1 2,741 2,969 5 GAL.1 110 431 5 GAL.2 29 276 5 GAL.1 18 140 5 GAL.1 39 403 10 24 5 GAL.1 281 281 1 5 GAL.2 101 210 5 GAL.66 5 GAL.487 5 GAL.988 5 GAL.698 1 281 1 158 1 158 1 158 96,934 21,928 5,702 21,048 17,106 51,318 85,530 8.835 2,310 20,856 5,214 390 5,454 4,425 1,950 35,633 5,170 3.306 1,674 4.836 290 3,372 2.525 8,324 790 5,846 11,850 N N TOS 14 N TOS 1 TOS 2 N N N TOS 1 TOS 12 N TOS 15 TOS TOS 2 5 GAL. N N 5 GAL. TOS 53 5 GAL. 15 GAL. 36" BOX 48" BOX 3 3 15 GAL. 36" BOX 48" BOX 1 1 36" BOX 48" BOX 12 12 36" BOX 48" BOX 3 3 5 GAL. 2 634 2,536 211 5,262 439 1 158 1 110 1 281 101 1 2,741 2 634 2 5,702 2 5,702 2 5,702 1 1,754 1 1,754 1 1,754 2 5,702 2 5,702 2 5,702 1 2,741 1 1,754 1 1,754 1 1,754 1 1,754 1,754 146 5,262 439 1,754 146 36,834 3,070 5,482 457 4755,702 4755,702 102,636 8,553 1,75421,048 1,75421,048 128,042 10,670 1,42617,106 95011,404 188,166 15,681 634 53 38,374 3,198 530 44 4.215 351 4,620 385 1 39 1 1,754 160 33 33 33 10 3 281 23 49 54 177 77 13 47 114 98 126 12 25 5 37 75 53 1 42 14 17 12 18 1,911 159 65 99 21 18 73 33 8 4 35 5 GAL. 62 29 114 64 109 5 GAL. 5 GAL. 5 GAL. 1 39 4,563 380 1 39 1922.301 1 632 3,37140,448 2 201 1,84322,110 N N N RIGHT-OF-WAY PLANT SCHEDULE BOTANICAL NAME SIZE COMMON NAME ACCENTS & SUCCULENTS AGAVE COLORATA MESCAL CENIZA ALOE X 'BLUE ELF' BLUE ELF ALOE CARNEGIA GIGANTEA SAGUARO ECHINOCACTUS GRUSONII GOLDEN BARREL EUPHORBIA ANTISYPHILITICA CANDELILLA EUPHORBIA RESINIFERA MOROCCAN MOUND OPUNTIA MACROCENTRA BLACK SPINE PRICKLY PEAR 5 GAL. 5 GAL. 5 GAL. 5 GAL. 5 GAL. 5 GAL. TOS LANDSCAPE PLAN NORTH 0'15'30'60' SCALE: 1"=30' LANDSCAPE PLAN GATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVE A PORTION OF THE S.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, G.&S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA 2203155, 2301138, 2301232 CASE #2301236 I:\PROJECTS\CCD-15\AUTOCAD\WORKING DRAWINGS\CCD-15_LS 2.DWG, 03/07/2024, 11:04 AM, KENDRA POTTERPROJECT: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS/SUBMITTALS DATE# OF CASE NO: REFERENCE: CALL TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG 602-263-1100 1-800-STAKE-IT (OUTSIDE MARICOPA COUNTY) F O R A G E N C Y R E V I E W A N D A P P R O V A L O N L Y . N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N . N O T F O R B I D D I N G THE USE OF PLANS PREPARED BY THE PLANNING CENTER SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE ORIGINAL SITE FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED AND PUBLICATION THEREOF IS LIMITED TO SUCH USE. REPRODUCTION, PUBLICATION OR RE-USE BY ANY METHOD, IN WHOLE OR PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS PROHIBITED. TITLE TO THESE CONCEPTS AND PLANSREMAIN WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WITHOUT PREJUDICE. VISUAL CONTACT WITH THE PLANS SHALL CONSTITUTE PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF THESE RESTRICTIONS. THE DRAWINGS OR CONCEPTS SHALL NOT BE USED IN PART OR IN WHOLE FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT JUST COMPENSATION AND PERMISSION FROM THE PLANNING CENTER.THE PL GCEANNNIN ERT a d i v i i Isooonf nTPCGrup,c. e scr conegtetu osn az 857012600 520.623.6146 520.622.1950 azplanningcenter.comss CCD-15 03/07/24 KDP DB LS-1 13 33 DANIEL A. BRADSHAW 58092 E X PIRES 0 6 /3 0 /26MATCHLINE SHEET LS-2MATCHLINE SHEET LS-2THIS SHEET KEY MAP PROJECT BOUNDARY APARTMENT VEHICULAR ENTRY RECREATION 219-19-1950 LEGEND Wash 2' Contour Interval Parcels Project Boundary BUFFERYARD "A" 15' WIDE 15'LIMITS OF GRADING HYDROSEED MIX 100-year Floodplain UNKNOWN WASH (2,000 - 5,000 cfs) 100YR FLOODPLAIN LIMITS OF GRADING LIMITS OF GRADING SCREEN WALL SCREEN WALL SCREEN WALL SCREEN WALL UNDISTURBED OPEN SPACE (TO REMAIN) SCREEN WALLS (TYP.) SVT SVT 03/07/24 E C CEM M WBF WBF W BFW BFWBF WBF SD SD SD WBFN N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N NNN N N N N N N N N NN N N N N N N MANA G E R 265 MAIL / P A C K A G E 272 GYM 266 MEN 278 WOM E N 277 CLUB 273 LEASI N G 274 HALL W A Y 268 OFFIC E 291 POOL E Q P 292 N N N 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX N RIGHT-OF-WAY PLANT SCHEDULE BOTANICAL NAME SIZE COMMON NAME ACCENTS & SUCCULENTS AGAVE COLORATA MESCAL CENIZA ALOE X 'BLUE ELF' BLUE ELF ALOE CARNEGIA GIGANTEA SAGUARO ECHINOCACTUS GRUSONII GOLDEN BARREL EUPHORBIA ANTISYPHILITICA CANDELILLA EUPHORBIA RESINIFERA MOROCCAN MOUND OPUNTIA MACROCENTRA BLACK SPINE PRICKLY PEAR 5 GAL. 5 GAL. 5 GAL. 5 GAL. 5 GAL. 5 GAL. TOS INERT GROUNDCOVER BOULDERS: BUILDER TO USE EXISTING SITE BOULDERS. SURFACE SELECT ADDITIONAL TO SUPPLEMENT AS NEEDED. LRG SMALL (2X3) LARGE (3X4) 3/8" MINUS ROCK. MFR: KALAMAZOO MATERIALS. COLOR: PALOMINO CORAL. INSTALL AT DEPTH OF 2" MINIMUM WITH SURFACE 1" BELOW HARDSCAPE SURFACE. INSTALL IN ACCENT AREAS AND PRIVATE SEATING NOTES. (SEE LS PLANS.) MFR: KALAMAZOO MATERIALS. COLOR: APACHE ROSE. INSTALL AT DEPTH OF 2" MINIMUM WITH SURFACE 1" BELOW HARDSCAPE SURFACE. INSTALL IN BIKE PARKING SURFACE. (SEE LS PLANS.) RIGHT-OF-WAY SCREENED ROCK TO MATCH EXISTING. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY TO MATCH TYPE, SIZE, & COLOR OF EXISTING SCREENED ROCK IN RIGHT-OF-WAY. INSTALL AT DEPTH OF 2 " MINIMUM THICKNESS. INSTALL TO REFURBISH PROJECT DISTURBED RIGHT-OF-WAY LANDSCAP. INSTALL IN LANDSCAPE BUFFERYARD 15 FT WIDE STRIP ALONG OUTSIDE OF VISTOSO HIGHLANDS THEME/ACCENT WALLS. DECORATIVE RIP RAP. MFR: KALAMAZOO MATERIALS. SIZE: 2"-4". COLOR: APACHE GOLD. INSTALL AT SITE MONUMENT, AND AMENITY ACCENT AREAS (SEE LS PLANS.) DESERT COBBLE 25% MIX & HYDROSEED MIX (SEE SHEET LS-4 FOR DETAILS.) MFR: KALAMAZOO MATERIALS. SIZE & APPLICATION: 25% SURFACE COVERAGE OF DESERT COBBLE MIX WITH 100% HYDROSEEED SURFACE COVERAGE (SEE DESERT COBBLE ROCK MIX FOR TYPE, SIZE, & QUANTITY MIXTURE OF ROCK.) COLOR: SEE DESERT COBBLE ROCK MIX.APPLY IN RAINWATER HARVESTING BASINS SOUTH OF PARKING & PROJECT EAST SIDE) DESERT COBBLE ROCK MIX 100%. MFR: KALAMAZOO MATERIALS. [(40%) 3 8" MINUS ROCK. COLOR: APACHE GOLD. + (25%) 1" SCREENED ROCK COLOR: SILVERBELL APACHE GOLD. + (20%) 2" SCREENED ROCK COLOR: SILVERBELL APACHE GOLD. + (15%) 2" TO 4" RIP-RAP. COLOR: APACHE GOLD.] APPLY AT 100% COVERAGE IN COMMON AREAS & PARKING ISLANDS. (SEE LS PLANS.) SML PROJECT SITE PLANT SCHEDULE BOTANICAL NAME SIZE QTY COMMON NAME TREES WATER USE TYPE ADWR ANNUAL USE AT MATURITY (GAL) ANNUAL WATER USE (GAL) MONTHLY WATER USE (GAL) 1TOS 1 1,754 15,786 1,316 15 GAL. 2 5,702 475 1TOS 1 1,754 5,262 439 15 GAL.2 5,702 8,077 SHRUBS ACCENTS & SUCCULENTS ACACIA CONSTRICTA WHITETHORN ACACIA ACACIA GREGGII CATCLAW ACACIA CHILOPSIS LINEARIS DESERT WILLOW OLNEYA TESOTA IRONWOOD TREE PARKINSONIA FLORIDUM BLUE PALO VERDE PARKINSONIA MICROPHYLLA FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE PROSOPIS VELUTINA VELVET MESQUITE PROSOPIS GLANDULOSA HONEY MESQUITE LYSILOMA WATSONII FEATHER TREE AMBROSIA DELTOIDEA TRIANGLELEAF BURSAGE ANISACANTHUS THURBERI DESERT HONEYSUCKLE ASCLEPIAS SUBULATA DESERT MILKWEED CALLIANDRA ERIOPHYLLA NATIVE FAIRY DUSTER CELTIS PALLIDA DESERT HACKBERRY DODONEA VISCOSA GREEN HOPSEED BUSH ENCELIA FARINOSA BRITTLEBUSH LAREA TRIDENTATA CREOSOTE LEUCOPHYLLUM SPP. TEXAS RANGER ANY CULTIVAR PENSTEMON SUPERBUS SUPERB PENSTEMON SPHAERALCEA AMBIGUA DESERT GLOBE MALLOW ZIZIPHUS OBTUSIFOLIA GRAYTHORN AGAVE COLORATA MESCAL CENIZA AGAVE PARRYI VAR. HUACHUCENSIS HUACHUCA AGAVE AGAVE VICTORIAE-REGINAE QUEEN VICTORIA AGAVE CARNEGIA GIGANTEA SAGUARO DASYLIRION WHEELERI DESERT SPOON ECHINOCACTUS GRUSONII GOLDEN BARREL ECHINOCEREUS SPP. HEDGEHOG CACTUS EUPHORBIA ANTISYPHILITICA CANDELILLA FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL FOUQUIERIA SPLENDENS OCOTILLO JUSTICIA CALIFORNICA CHUPUROSA OPUNTIA ENGELMANNII LINGUIFORMIS COW'S TONGUE PRICKLY PEAR OPUNTIA MACROCENTRA BLACK SPINE PRICKLY PEAR OPUNTIA MICRODASYS 'YELLOW' YELLOW BUNNY EARS PRICKLY PEAR OPUNTIA VIOLACEA 'SANTA RITA' SANTA RITA PRICKLY PEAR PEDILANTHUS MACROCARPUS SLIPPER FLOWER YUCCA ELATA SOAPTREE YUCCA YUCCA RIGIDA BLUE TREE YUCCA 15 GAL.1 2,741 1,827 15 GAL. 1 1,754 1,754 15 GAL. 2 5,702 1,426 15 GAL.2 5,702 4,277 15 GAL.2 5,702 7,128 5 GAL.2 101 2,929 244 5 GAL.2 57 736 5 GAL.1 70 193 5 GAL.1 632 1,738 5 GAL.1 158 435 5 GAL.1 39 33 5 GAL. 5 GAL.2 101 455 5 GAL.2 25 369 5 GAL.2 25 163 5 GAL.1 2,741 2,969 5 GAL.1 110 431 5 GAL.2 29 276 5 GAL.1 18 140 5 GAL.1 39 403 10 24 5 GAL.1 281 281 1 5 GAL.2 101 210 5 GAL.66 5 GAL.487 5 GAL.988 5 GAL.698 1 281 1 158 1 158 1 158 96,934 21,928 5,702 21,048 17,106 51,318 85,530 8.835 2,310 20,856 5,214 390 5,454 4,425 1,950 35,633 5,170 3.306 1,674 4.836 290 3,372 2.525 8,324 790 5,846 11,850 N N TOS 14 N TOS 1 TOS 2 N N N TOS 1 TOS 12 N TOS 15 TOS TOS 2 5 GAL. N N 5 GAL. TOS 53 5 GAL. 15 GAL. 36" BOX 48" BOX 3 3 15 GAL. 36" BOX 48" BOX 1 1 36" BOX 48" BOX 12 12 36" BOX 48" BOX 3 3 5 GAL. 2 634 2,536 211 5,262 439 1 158 1 110 1 281 101 1 2,741 2 634 2 5,702 2 5,702 2 5,702 1 1,754 1 1,754 1 1,754 2 5,702 2 5,702 2 5,702 1 2,741 1 1,754 1 1,754 1 1,754 1 1,754 1,754 146 5,262 439 1,754 146 36,834 3,070 5,482 457 4755,702 4755,702 102,636 8,553 1,75421,048 1,75421,048 128,042 10,670 1,42617,106 95011,404 188,166 15,681 634 53 38,374 3,198 530 44 4.215 351 4,620 385 1 39 1 1,754 160 33 33 33 10 3 281 23 49 54 177 77 13 47 114 98 126 12 25 5 37 75 53 1 42 14 17 12 18 1,911 159 65 99 21 18 73 33 8 4 35 5 GAL. 62 29 114 64 109 5 GAL. 5 GAL. 5 GAL. 1 39 4,563 380 1 39 1922.301 1 632 3,37140,448 2 201 1,84322,110 N N LANDSCAPE PLAN LANDSCAPE PLAN GATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVE A PORTION OF THE S.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, G.&S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA 2203155, 2301138, 2301232 CASE #2301236 I:\PROJECTS\CCD-15\AUTOCAD\WORKING DRAWINGS\CCD-15_LS 2.DWG, 03/07/2024, 11:04 AM, KENDRA POTTERPROJECT: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS/SUBMITTALS DATE# OF CASE NO: REFERENCE: CALL TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG 602-263-1100 1-800-STAKE-IT (OUTSIDE MARICOPA COUNTY) F O R A G E N C Y R E V I E W A N D A P P R O V A L O N L Y . N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N . N O T F O R B I D D I N G THE USE OF PLANS PREPARED BY THE PLANNING CENTER SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE ORIGINAL SITE FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED AND PUBLICATION THEREOF IS LIMITED TO SUCH USE. REPRODUCTION, PUBLICATION OR RE-USE BY ANY METHOD, IN WHOLE OR PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS PROHIBITED. TITLE TO THESE CONCEPTS AND PLANSREMAIN WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WITHOUT PREJUDICE. VISUAL CONTACT WITH THE PLANS SHALL CONSTITUTE PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF THESE RESTRICTIONS. THE DRAWINGS OR CONCEPTS SHALL NOT BE USED IN PART OR IN WHOLE FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT JUST COMPENSATION AND PERMISSION FROM THE PLANNING CENTER.THE PL GCEANNNIN ERT a d i v i i Isooonf nTPCGrup,c. e scr conegtetu osn az 857012600 520.623.6146 520.622.1950 azplanningcenter.comss CCD-15 03/07/24 KDP DB LS-2 14 33 DANIEL A. BRADSHAW 58092 E X PIRES 0 6 /3 0 /26MATCHLINE SHEET LS-1MATCHLINE SHEET LS-1MATCHLINE SHEET LS-3 NORTH 0'15'30'60' SCALE: 1"=30' THIS SHEET KEY MAP APARTMENT VEHICULAR ENTRY OPEN SPACE 219-19-182A OPEN SPACE 219-19-1890 VISTOSO HIGHLANDS HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 219-19-1150 BUFFERYARD "A" 15' WIDE 15'RIGHT-OF-WAY LANDSCAPE TO MITIGATE DISTURBED EXISTING LEGEND Wash 2' Contour Interval Parcels Project Boundary 100-year Floodplain PROJECT BOUNDARY HYDROSEED MIX 100YR FLOODPLAIN HIGHLANDS WASH LIMITS OF GRADING LIMITS OF GRADING SCREEN WALL (TYP.) SCREEN WALL (TYP.) SCREEN WALL (TYP.) SCREEN WALL (TYP.) WATER HARVESTING BASIN WATER HARVESTING BASIN WATER HARVESTING BASIN SVT SVT SVT SEWER UTILITY UTILITY EASEMENT FIRE HYDRANT, PUBLIC/PRIVATE WATER METERS 03/07/24 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N NN N N NNN N N NN N N N N N N N N NN N N N N N 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX N RIGHT-OF-WAY PLANT SCHEDULE BOTANICAL NAME SIZE COMMON NAME ACCENTS & SUCCULENTS AGAVE COLORATA MESCAL CENIZA ALOE X 'BLUE ELF' BLUE ELF ALOE CARNEGIA GIGANTEA SAGUARO ECHINOCACTUS GRUSONII GOLDEN BARREL EUPHORBIA ANTISYPHILITICA CANDELILLA EUPHORBIA RESINIFERA MOROCCAN MOUND OPUNTIA MACROCENTRA BLACK SPINE PRICKLY PEAR 5 GAL. 5 GAL. 5 GAL. 5 GAL. 5 GAL. 5 GAL. TOS INERT GROUNDCOVER BOULDERS: BUILDER TO USE EXISTING SITE BOULDERS. SURFACE SELECT ADDITIONAL TO SUPPLEMENT AS NEEDED. LRG SMALL (2X3) LARGE (3X4) 3/8" MINUS ROCK. MFR: KALAMAZOO MATERIALS. COLOR: PALOMINO CORAL. INSTALL AT DEPTH OF 2" MINIMUM WITH SURFACE 1" BELOW HARDSCAPE SURFACE. INSTALL IN ACCENT AREAS AND PRIVATE SEATING NOTES. (SEE LS PLANS.) MFR: KALAMAZOO MATERIALS. COLOR: APACHE ROSE. INSTALL AT DEPTH OF 2" MINIMUM WITH SURFACE 1" BELOW HARDSCAPE SURFACE. INSTALL IN BIKE PARKING SURFACE. (SEE LS PLANS.) RIGHT-OF-WAY SCREENED ROCK TO MATCH EXISTING. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY TO MATCH TYPE, SIZE, & COLOR OF EXISTING SCREENED ROCK IN RIGHT-OF-WAY. INSTALL AT DEPTH OF 2 " MINIMUM THICKNESS. INSTALL TO REFURBISH PROJECT DISTURBED RIGHT-OF-WAY LANDSCAP. INSTALL IN LANDSCAPE BUFFERYARD 15 FT WIDE STRIP ALONG OUTSIDE OF VISTOSO HIGHLANDS THEME/ACCENT WALLS. DECORATIVE RIP RAP. MFR: KALAMAZOO MATERIALS. SIZE: 2"-4". COLOR: APACHE GOLD. INSTALL AT SITE MONUMENT, AND AMENITY ACCENT AREAS (SEE LS PLANS.) DESERT COBBLE 25% MIX & HYDROSEED MIX (SEE SHEET LS-4 FOR DETAILS.) MFR: KALAMAZOO MATERIALS. SIZE & APPLICATION: 25% SURFACE COVERAGE OF DESERT COBBLE MIX WITH 100% HYDROSEEED SURFACE COVERAGE (SEE DESERT COBBLE ROCK MIX FOR TYPE, SIZE, & QUANTITY MIXTURE OF ROCK.) COLOR: SEE DESERT COBBLE ROCK MIX.APPLY IN RAINWATER HARVESTING BASINS SOUTH OF PARKING & PROJECT EAST SIDE) DESERT COBBLE ROCK MIX 100%. MFR: KALAMAZOO MATERIALS. [(40%) 3 8" MINUS ROCK. COLOR: APACHE GOLD. + (25%) 1" SCREENED ROCK COLOR: SILVERBELL APACHE GOLD. + (20%) 2" SCREENED ROCK COLOR: SILVERBELL APACHE GOLD. + (15%) 2" TO 4" RIP-RAP. COLOR: APACHE GOLD.] APPLY AT 100% COVERAGE IN COMMON AREAS & PARKING ISLANDS. (SEE LS PLANS.) SML PROJECT SITE PLANT SCHEDULE BOTANICAL NAME SIZE QTY COMMON NAME TREES WATER USE TYPE ADWR ANNUAL USE AT MATURITY (GAL) ANNUAL WATER USE (GAL) MONTHLY WATER USE (GAL) 1TOS 1 1,754 15,786 1,316 15 GAL. 2 5,702 475 1TOS 1 1,754 5,262 439 15 GAL.2 5,702 8,077 SHRUBS ACCENTS & SUCCULENTS ACACIA CONSTRICTA WHITETHORN ACACIA ACACIA GREGGII CATCLAW ACACIA CHILOPSIS LINEARIS DESERT WILLOW OLNEYA TESOTA IRONWOOD TREE PARKINSONIA FLORIDUM BLUE PALO VERDE PARKINSONIA MICROPHYLLA FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE PROSOPIS VELUTINA VELVET MESQUITE PROSOPIS GLANDULOSA HONEY MESQUITE LYSILOMA WATSONII FEATHER TREE AMBROSIA DELTOIDEA TRIANGLELEAF BURSAGE ANISACANTHUS THURBERI DESERT HONEYSUCKLE ASCLEPIAS SUBULATA DESERT MILKWEED CALLIANDRA ERIOPHYLLA NATIVE FAIRY DUSTER CELTIS PALLIDA DESERT HACKBERRY DODONEA VISCOSA GREEN HOPSEED BUSH ENCELIA FARINOSA BRITTLEBUSH LAREA TRIDENTATA CREOSOTE LEUCOPHYLLUM SPP. TEXAS RANGER ANY CULTIVAR PENSTEMON SUPERBUS SUPERB PENSTEMON SPHAERALCEA AMBIGUA DESERT GLOBE MALLOW ZIZIPHUS OBTUSIFOLIA GRAYTHORN AGAVE COLORATA MESCAL CENIZA AGAVE PARRYI VAR. HUACHUCENSIS HUACHUCA AGAVE AGAVE VICTORIAE-REGINAE QUEEN VICTORIA AGAVE CARNEGIA GIGANTEA SAGUARO DASYLIRION WHEELERI DESERT SPOON ECHINOCACTUS GRUSONII GOLDEN BARREL ECHINOCEREUS SPP. HEDGEHOG CACTUS EUPHORBIA ANTISYPHILITICA CANDELILLA FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL FOUQUIERIA SPLENDENS OCOTILLO JUSTICIA CALIFORNICA CHUPUROSA OPUNTIA ENGELMANNII LINGUIFORMIS COW'S TONGUE PRICKLY PEAR OPUNTIA MACROCENTRA BLACK SPINE PRICKLY PEAR OPUNTIA MICRODASYS 'YELLOW' YELLOW BUNNY EARS PRICKLY PEAR OPUNTIA VIOLACEA 'SANTA RITA' SANTA RITA PRICKLY PEAR PEDILANTHUS MACROCARPUS SLIPPER FLOWER YUCCA ELATA SOAPTREE YUCCA YUCCA RIGIDA BLUE TREE YUCCA 15 GAL.1 2,741 1,827 15 GAL. 1 1,754 1,754 15 GAL. 2 5,702 1,426 15 GAL.2 5,702 4,277 15 GAL.2 5,702 7,128 5 GAL.2 101 2,929 244 5 GAL.2 57 736 5 GAL.1 70 193 5 GAL.1 632 1,738 5 GAL.1 158 435 5 GAL.1 39 33 5 GAL. 5 GAL.2 101 455 5 GAL.2 25 369 5 GAL.2 25 163 5 GAL.1 2,741 2,969 5 GAL.1 110 431 5 GAL.2 29 276 5 GAL.1 18 140 5 GAL.1 39 403 10 24 5 GAL.1 281 281 1 5 GAL.2 101 210 5 GAL.66 5 GAL.487 5 GAL.988 5 GAL.698 1 281 1 158 1 158 1 158 96,934 21,928 5,702 21,048 17,106 51,318 85,530 8.835 2,310 20,856 5,214 390 5,454 4,425 1,950 35,633 5,170 3.306 1,674 4.836 290 3,372 2.525 8,324 790 5,846 11,850 N N TOS 14 N TOS 1 TOS 2 N N N TOS 1 TOS 12 N TOS 15 TOS TOS 2 5 GAL. N N 5 GAL. TOS 53 5 GAL. 15 GAL. 36" BOX 48" BOX 3 3 15 GAL. 36" BOX 48" BOX 1 1 36" BOX 48" BOX 12 12 36" BOX 48" BOX 3 3 5 GAL. 2 634 2,536 211 5,262 439 1 158 1 110 1 281 101 1 2,741 2 634 2 5,702 2 5,702 2 5,702 1 1,754 1 1,754 1 1,754 2 5,702 2 5,702 2 5,702 1 2,741 1 1,754 1 1,754 1 1,754 1 1,754 1,754 146 5,262 439 1,754 146 36,834 3,070 5,482 457 4755,702 4755,702 102,636 8,553 1,75421,048 1,75421,048 128,042 10,670 1,42617,106 95011,404 188,166 15,681 634 53 38,374 3,198 530 44 4.215 351 4,620 385 1 39 1 1,754 160 33 33 33 10 3 281 23 49 54 177 77 13 47 114 98 126 12 25 5 37 75 53 1 42 14 17 12 18 1,911 159 65 99 21 18 73 33 8 4 35 5 GAL. 62 29 114 64 109 5 GAL. 5 GAL. 5 GAL. 1 39 4,563 380 1 39 1922.301 1 632 3,37140,448 2 201 1,84322,110 N N LANDSCAPE PLAN LANDSCAPE PLAN GATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVE A PORTION OF THE S.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, G.&S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA 2203155, 2301138, 2301232 CASE #2301236 I:\PROJECTS\CCD-15\AUTOCAD\WORKING DRAWINGS\CCD-15_LS 2.DWG, 03/07/2024, 11:04 AM, KENDRA POTTERPROJECT: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS/SUBMITTALS DATE# OF CASE NO: REFERENCE: CALL TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG 602-263-1100 1-800-STAKE-IT (OUTSIDE MARICOPA COUNTY) F O R A G E N C Y R E V I E W A N D A P P R O V A L O N L Y . N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N . N O T F O R B I D D I N G THE USE OF PLANS PREPARED BY THE PLANNING CENTER SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE ORIGINAL SITE FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED AND PUBLICATION THEREOF IS LIMITED TO SUCH USE. REPRODUCTION, PUBLICATION OR RE-USE BY ANY METHOD, IN WHOLE OR PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS PROHIBITED. TITLE TO THESE CONCEPTS AND PLANSREMAIN WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WITHOUT PREJUDICE. VISUAL CONTACT WITH THE PLANS SHALL CONSTITUTE PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF THESE RESTRICTIONS. THE DRAWINGS OR CONCEPTS SHALL NOT BE USED IN PART OR IN WHOLE FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT JUST COMPENSATION AND PERMISSION FROM THE PLANNING CENTER.THE PL GCEANNNIN ERT a d i v i i Isooonf nTPCGrup,c. e scr conegtetu osn az 857012600 520.623.6146 520.622.1950 azplanningcenter.comss CCD-15 03/07/24 KDP DB LS-3 15 33 DANIEL A. BRADSHAW 58092 E X PIRES 0 6 /3 0 /26MATCHLINE SHEET LS-1MATCHLINE SHEET LS-2 NORTH 0'15'30'60' SCALE: 1"=30' THIS SHEET KEY MAP WATER HARVESTING BASIN WATER HARVESTING BASIN RECREATION 219-19-1950 OPEN SPACE 219-19-1890 TRAIL CONNECTION (SEE CIVIL PLANS & DETAIL 6 SHEET HD-2) LEGEND Wash 2' Contour Interval Parcels Project Boundary 100-year Floodplain PROJECT BOUNDARY HYDROSEED MIX 100YR FLOODPLAIN HIGHLANDS WASH HYDROSEED MIX HYDROSEED MIX LIMITS OF GRADING LIMITS OF GRADING LIMITS OF GRADING WATER HARVESTING BASIN UNDISTURBED OPEN SPACE (TO REMAIN) ROCK OUTCROPPING 03/07/24 INERT GROUNDCOVER BOULDERS: BUILDER TO USE EXISTING SITE BOULDERS. SURFACE SELECT ADDITIONAL TO SUPPLEMENT AS NEEDED. LRG SMALL (2X3) LARGE (3X4) 3/8" MINUS ROCK. MFR: KALAMAZOO MATERIALS. COLOR: PALOMINO CORAL. INSTALL AT DEPTH OF 2" MINIMUM WITH SURFACE 1" BELOW HARDSCAPE SURFACE. INSTALL IN ACCENT AREAS AND PRIVATE SEATING NOTES. (SEE LS PLANS.) MFR: KALAMAZOO MATERIALS. COLOR: APACHE ROSE. INSTALL AT DEPTH OF 2" MINIMUM WITH SURFACE 1" BELOW HARDSCAPE SURFACE. INSTALL IN BIKE PARKING SURFACE. (SEE LS PLANS.) RIGHT-OF-WAY SCREENED ROCK TO MATCH EXISTING. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY TO MATCH TYPE, SIZE, & COLOR OF EXISTING SCREENED ROCK IN RIGHT-OF-WAY. INSTALL AT DEPTH OF 2 " MINIMUM THICKNESS. INSTALL TO REFURBISH PROJECT DISTURBED RIGHT-OF-WAY LANDSCAP. INSTALL IN LANDSCAPE BUFFERYARD 15 FT WIDE STRIP ALONG OUTSIDE OF VISTOSO HIGHLANDS THEME/ACCENT WALLS. DECORATIVE RIP RAP. MFR: KALAMAZOO MATERIALS. SIZE: 2"-4". COLOR: APACHE GOLD. INSTALL AT SITE MONUMENT, AND AMENITY ACCENT AREAS (SEE LS PLANS.) DESERT COBBLE 25% MIX & HYDROSEED MIX (SEE SHEET LS-4 FOR DETAILS.) MFR: KALAMAZOO MATERIALS. SIZE & APPLICATION: 25% SURFACE COVERAGE OF DESERT COBBLE MIX WITH 100% HYDROSEEED SURFACE COVERAGE (SEE DESERT COBBLE ROCK MIX FOR TYPE, SIZE, & QUANTITY MIXTURE OF ROCK.) COLOR: SEE DESERT COBBLE ROCK MIX.APPLY IN RAINWATER HARVESTING BASINS SOUTH OF PARKING & PROJECT EAST SIDE) DESERT COBBLE ROCK MIX 100%. MFR: KALAMAZOO MATERIALS. [(40%) 3 8" MINUS ROCK. COLOR: APACHE GOLD. + (25%) 1" SCREENED ROCK COLOR: SILVERBELL APACHE GOLD. + (20%) 2" SCREENED ROCK COLOR: SILVERBELL APACHE GOLD. + (15%) 2" TO 4" RIP-RAP. COLOR: APACHE GOLD.] APPLY AT 100% COVERAGE IN COMMON AREAS & PARKING ISLANDS. (SEE LS PLANS.) SML PROJECT SITE PLANT SCHEDULE BOTANICAL NAME SIZE QTY COMMON NAME TREES WATER USE TYPE ADWR ANNUAL USE AT MATURITY (GAL) ANNUAL WATER USE (GAL) MONTHLY WATER USE (GAL) 1TOS 1 1,754 15,786 1,316 15 GAL. 2 5,702 475 1TOS 1 1,754 5,262 439 15 GAL.2 5,702 8,077 SHRUBS ACCENTS & SUCCULENTS ACACIA CONSTRICTA WHITETHORN ACACIA ACACIA GREGGII CATCLAW ACACIA CHILOPSIS LINEARIS DESERT WILLOW OLNEYA TESOTA IRONWOOD TREE PARKINSONIA FLORIDUM BLUE PALO VERDE PARKINSONIA MICROPHYLLA FOOTHILLS PALO VERDE PROSOPIS VELUTINA VELVET MESQUITE PROSOPIS GLANDULOSA HONEY MESQUITE LYSILOMA WATSONII FEATHER TREE AMBROSIA DELTOIDEA TRIANGLELEAF BURSAGE ANISACANTHUS THURBERI DESERT HONEYSUCKLE ASCLEPIAS SUBULATA DESERT MILKWEED CALLIANDRA ERIOPHYLLA NATIVE FAIRY DUSTER CELTIS PALLIDA DESERT HACKBERRY DODONEA VISCOSA GREEN HOPSEED BUSH ENCELIA FARINOSA BRITTLEBUSH LAREA TRIDENTATA CREOSOTE LEUCOPHYLLUM SPP. TEXAS RANGER ANY CULTIVAR PENSTEMON SUPERBUS SUPERB PENSTEMON SPHAERALCEA AMBIGUA DESERT GLOBE MALLOW ZIZIPHUS OBTUSIFOLIA GRAYTHORN AGAVE COLORATA MESCAL CENIZA AGAVE PARRYI VAR. HUACHUCENSIS HUACHUCA AGAVE AGAVE VICTORIAE-REGINAE QUEEN VICTORIA AGAVE CARNEGIA GIGANTEA SAGUARO DASYLIRION WHEELERI DESERT SPOON ECHINOCACTUS GRUSONII GOLDEN BARREL ECHINOCEREUS SPP. HEDGEHOG CACTUS EUPHORBIA ANTISYPHILITICA CANDELILLA FEROCACTUS WISLIZENII FISHHOOK BARREL FOUQUIERIA SPLENDENS OCOTILLO JUSTICIA CALIFORNICA CHUPUROSA OPUNTIA ENGELMANNII LINGUIFORMIS COW'S TONGUE PRICKLY PEAR OPUNTIA MACROCENTRA BLACK SPINE PRICKLY PEAR OPUNTIA MICRODASYS 'YELLOW' YELLOW BUNNY EARS PRICKLY PEAR OPUNTIA VIOLACEA 'SANTA RITA' SANTA RITA PRICKLY PEAR PEDILANTHUS MACROCARPUS SLIPPER FLOWER YUCCA ELATA SOAPTREE YUCCA YUCCA RIGIDA BLUE TREE YUCCA 15 GAL.1 2,741 1,827 15 GAL. 1 1,754 1,754 15 GAL. 2 5,702 1,426 15 GAL.2 5,702 4,277 15 GAL.2 5,702 7,128 5 GAL.2 101 2,929 244 5 GAL.2 57 736 5 GAL.1 70 193 5 GAL.1 632 1,738 5 GAL.1 158 435 5 GAL.1 39 33 5 GAL. 5 GAL.2 101 455 5 GAL.2 25 369 5 GAL.2 25 163 5 GAL.1 2,741 2,969 5 GAL.1 110 431 5 GAL.2 29 276 5 GAL.1 18 140 5 GAL.1 39 403 10 24 5 GAL.1 281 281 1 5 GAL.2 101 210 5 GAL.66 5 GAL.487 5 GAL.988 5 GAL.698 1 281 1 158 1 158 1 158 96,934 21,928 5,702 21,048 17,106 51,318 85,530 8.835 2,310 20,856 5,214 390 5,454 4,425 1,950 35,633 5,170 3.306 1,674 4.836 290 3,372 2.525 8,324 790 5,846 11,850 N N TOS 14 N TOS 1 TOS 2 N N N TOS 1 TOS 12 N TOS 15 TOS TOS 2 5 GAL. N N 5 GAL. TOS 53 5 GAL. 15 GAL. 36" BOX 48" BOX 3 3 15 GAL. 36" BOX 48" BOX 1 1 36" BOX 48" BOX 12 12 36" BOX 48" BOX 3 3 5 GAL. 2 634 2,536 211 5,262 439 1 158 1 110 1 281 101 1 2,741 2 634 2 5,702 2 5,702 2 5,702 1 1,754 1 1,754 1 1,754 2 5,702 2 5,702 2 5,702 1 2,741 1 1,754 1 1,754 1 1,754 1 1,754 1,754 146 5,262 439 1,754 146 36,834 3,070 5,482 457 4755,702 4755,702 102,636 8,553 1,75421,048 1,75421,048 128,042 10,670 1,42617,106 95011,404 188,166 15,681 634 53 38,374 3,198 530 44 4.215 351 4,620 385 1 39 1 1,754 160 33 33 33 10 3 281 23 49 54 177 77 13 47 114 98 126 12 25 5 37 75 53 1 42 14 17 12 18 1,911 159 65 99 21 18 73 33 8 4 35 5 GAL. 62 29 114 64 109 5 GAL. 5 GAL. 5 GAL. 1 39 4,563 380 1 39 1922.301 1 632 3,37140,448 2 201 1,84322,110 N N N RIGHT-OF-WAY PLANT SCHEDULE BOTANICAL NAME SIZE QTY COMMON NAME WATER USE TYPE ADWR ANNUAL USE AT MATURITY (GAL) ANNUAL WATER USE (GAL) MONTHLY WATER USE (GAL) ACCENTS & SUCCULENTS AGAVE COLORATA MESCAL CENIZA ALOE X 'BLUE ELF' BLUE ELF ALOE CARNEGIA GIGANTEA SAGUARO ECHINOCACTUS GRUSONII GOLDEN BARREL EUPHORBIA ANTISYPHILITICA CANDELILLA EUPHORBIA RESINIFERA MOROCCAN MOUND OPUNTIA MACROCENTRA BLACK SPINE PRICKLY PEAR 5 GAL.1 39 20 5 GAL.2 912 760 5 GAL.3 29 12 5 GAL.1 39 20 5 GAL.1 5 GAL.791158 234 9,120 145 234 948 TOS 4 1 2,741 16,446 1,371 6 10 5 6 6 6 39 20234 LANDSCAPE NOTES LANDSCAPE PLAN GATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVE A PORTION OF THE S.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, G.&S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA 2203155, 2301138, 2301232 CASE #2301236 I:\PROJECTS\CCD-15\AUTOCAD\WORKING DRAWINGS\CCD-15_LS 2.DWG, 03/07/2024, 11:04 AM, KENDRA POTTERPROJECT: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS/SUBMITTALS DATE# OF CASE NO: REFERENCE: CALL TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG 602-263-1100 1-800-STAKE-IT (OUTSIDE MARICOPA COUNTY) F O R A G E N C Y R E V I E W A N D A P P R O V A L O N L Y . N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N . N O T F O R B I D D I N G THE USE OF PLANS PREPARED BY THE PLANNING CENTER SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE ORIGINAL SITE FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED AND PUBLICATION THEREOF IS LIMITED TO SUCH USE. REPRODUCTION, PUBLICATION OR RE-USE BY ANY METHOD, IN WHOLE OR PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS PROHIBITED. TITLE TO THESE CONCEPTS AND PLANSREMAIN WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WITHOUT PREJUDICE. VISUAL CONTACT WITH THE PLANS SHALL CONSTITUTE PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF THESE RESTRICTIONS. THE DRAWINGS OR CONCEPTS SHALL NOT BE USED IN PART OR IN WHOLE FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT JUST COMPENSATION AND PERMISSION FROM THE PLANNING CENTER.THE PL GCEANNNIN ERT a d i v i i Isooonf nTPCGrup,c. e scr conegtetu osn az 857012600 520.623.6146 520.622.1950 azplanningcenter.comss CCD-15 03/07/24 KDP DB LS-4 16 33 DANIEL A. BRADSHAW 58092 E X PIRES 0 6 /3 0 /26PLANTING NOTES 1.The owner's representative shall reserve the right to refuse any plant materials that are deemed unacceptable 2.The owner's representative shall approve all material substitutions. 3.All plant material and specifications shall conform to the Arizona Nursery Association standards. 4.Plants shall feature growth habit that is normal for the species. Plants shall be healthy, vigorous, and free from disease, insect, or injury. 5.All plant material shall be guaranteed for a period of one (1) year after final acceptance. 6.Plants shall be installed near sidewalks and hardscape areas with sufficient space for future growth (to full maturity) without the obstruction of adjacent pedestrian/vehicular circulation. The owner's representative shall approve of plan installation locations. Any plant location that is deemed "too close" to sidewalk or hardscape shall be relocated. 7.Young plants must be easily visible in the landscape after installation, to ensure that they are not trampled, neglected, or covered with rock mulch. Contractor shall flag any newly installed shrub, ground cover, or accent plant under 3" in height (above screened rock mulch) through the first season of growth. All deciduous shrubs and ground covers installed during the months of December-February and under 6" in height (above screened rock mulch) shall be flagged through the first growth season. 8.Contractor shall provide incidental grading in all landscaped areas to bring ground to finish grade, per civil and landscape plans. Finish grade shall be raked smooth before and after installation of plants, in preparation to receive screened decorative rock mulch. No screened rock mulch shall be applied to finish grade that is pock marked, trampled, settled, or eroded until after incidental grading to smooth surface. 9.All decorative screened rock shall be 1/2" (min.) below sidewalks and hardscape surfaces. 10.Contractor shall call in an Arizona 811 request at least 48 hours prior to any construction. 11.All signage and lighting to be addressed as part of a separate review and approval. 12.All meters, shall have a backflow protection device installed on the customer side of the meter. 13.Trees and shrubs shall be adequately supported when planted. 14.One (1) landscape island shall be placed every 9 parking spaces. One (1) canopy tree shall be planted per each landscape island. Per Oro Valley Zoning Code Section 27.6.C.6.B.ii. 15.Every landscape island in parking areas shall be designed for rainwater harvest. Per Oro Valley Zoning Code Code Section 27.6.C.6.B.ii. 16.A license agreement must be approved by town council prior to planting any landscape materials in the town right of way. Walls shall require a separate permit. Right-of-way use permit is required for all plants in the project's right-of-way improvement area. HYDROSEED MIX (FOR USE ALONG EXTERNAL SOUTHWESTERN, SOUTHEASTERN, & SOUTHERN PROJECT BOUNDARIES) NOTE: HYDROSEED MIX MEETS ADDENDUM (D) ORO VALLEY APPROVED REVEGETATION SEED MIX PER TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE. TREES CHILOPSIS LINEARA DESERT WILLOW 0.5 PLS/ACRE OLNEYA TESOTA IRONWOOD 1 PLS/ACRE PARKINSONIA FLORIDA BLUE PALO VERDE 1 PLS/ACRE PARKINSONIA MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILLS PAL VERDE 1 PLS/ACRE PROSOPIS VELUTINA VELVET MESQUITE 1 PLS/ACRE SAMBUCAS MEXICANA MEXICAN ELDERBERRY 0.5 PLS/ACRE SHRUBS REQUIRED:AT LEAST 4 SPECIES & MIN. 5 PLS/ACRE AMBROSIA DELTOIDEA TRIANGLE LEAF BURSAGE 2 PLS/ACRE CALLIANDRA ERIOPHYLLA FAIRY DUSTER 1 PLS/ACRE ENCELIA FARINOSA BRITTLEBUSH 2 PLS/ACRE LARREA TRIDENTATA CREOSOTE 1 PLS/ACRE SMALL PERENNIALS REQUIRED AT LEAST 4 SPECIES & MIN 5 PLS/ACRE BAILEYA MULTIRADIATA DESERT MARIGOLD 2 PLS/ACRE PSILOSTROPHE COOPERI PAPER FLOWER 1 PLS/ACRE SPHAERALCEA AMBIGUA DESERT GLOBEMALLOW 1 PLS/ACRE ZINNIA PUMILA DESERT ZINNIA 2 PLS/ACRE PERENNIAL GRASSES REQUIRED AT LEAST 4 SPECIES & MIN 5 PLS/ACRE ARISTIDA PURPUREA PURPLE THREE-AWN 2 PLS/ACRE BOUTELOUA CURTIPENDULA SIDE-OATS GRAMA 1 PLS/ACRE DIGITARIA CALIFORNICA ARIZONA COTTONTOP 0.5 PLS/ACRE ERAGROSTIS INTERMEDIA PLAINS LOVE GRASS 1 PLS/ACRE SPOROBOULS CRYPTANDRUS SAND DROPSEED 0.5 PLS/ACRE ANNUAL HERBS & GRASSES REQUIRED AT LEAST 4 SPECIES & MIN 5 PLS/ACRE DATURA DISCOLOR SACRED DATURA 0.5 PLS/ACRE ERIGERON DIVERGENS SPREADING FLEABANE 0.5 PLS/ACRE KALLSTROEMIA GRANDIFLORA ARIZONA POPPY 2 PLS/ACRE LUPINUS SPARSIFLORUS DESERT LUPINE 1 PLS/ACRE PENSTEMON PARRYI PARRY'S PENSTEMON 1 PLS/ACRE TOTAL 27 PLS/ACRE NOTE: THE PLANTS ON THE RIGHT OF WAY PLANT SCHEDULE REPRESENT THOSE PLANTS IDENTIFIED AS PART OF THE EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY LANDSCAPE. 03/07/24 LANDSCAPE DETAILS LANDSCAPE PLAN GATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVE A PORTION OF THE S.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, G.&S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA 2203155, 2301138, 2301232 CASE #2301236 I:\PROJECTS\CCD-15\AUTOCAD\WORKING DRAWINGS\CCD-15_LS 2.DWG, 03/07/2024, 11:04 AM, KENDRA POTTERPROJECT: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS/SUBMITTALS DATE# OF CASE NO: REFERENCE: CALL TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG 602-263-1100 1-800-STAKE-IT (OUTSIDE MARICOPA COUNTY) F O R A G E N C Y R E V I E W A N D A P P R O V A L O N L Y . N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N . N O T F O R B I D D I N G THE USE OF PLANS PREPARED BY THE PLANNING CENTER SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE ORIGINAL SITE FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED AND PUBLICATION THEREOF IS LIMITED TO SUCH USE. REPRODUCTION, PUBLICATION OR RE-USE BY ANY METHOD, IN WHOLE OR PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS PROHIBITED. TITLE TO THESE CONCEPTS AND PLANSREMAIN WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WITHOUT PREJUDICE. VISUAL CONTACT WITH THE PLANS SHALL CONSTITUTE PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF THESE RESTRICTIONS. THE DRAWINGS OR CONCEPTS SHALL NOT BE USED IN PART OR IN WHOLE FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT JUST COMPENSATION AND PERMISSION FROM THE PLANNING CENTER.THE PL GCEANNNIN ERT a d i v i i Isooonf nTPCGrup,c. e scr conegtetu osn az 857012600 520.623.6146 520.622.1950 azplanningcenter.comss CCD-15 03/07/24 KDP DB LD-1 17 33 DANIEL A. BRADSHAW 58092 E X PIRES 0 6 /3 0 /26NOTES: 1.MARK THE NORTH SIDE OF THE TREE IN THE FIELD BEFORE TRANSPLANTING, AND WHEN TRANSPLANTING ROTATE THE TREE TO FACE NORTH, WHENEVER POSSIBLE. 2.STAKING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED SO TRUNK HAS FLEXIBILITY. 3.SUFFICIENT CLEARANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN PLANTS AND UTILITY FACILITIES SO AS TO NOT HINDER UTILITY MAINTENANCE. 4.PRUNE TREE AT TIME OF STAKE REMOVAL, ONE YEAR AFTER INSTALLATION. 5.TREES SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN THEIR NATURAL FORM. OVER PRUNING AND/OR "BALLING" IS PROHIBITED. TREE CENTERED IN PIT FINISH GRADE ROOT BALL 3W W 2" DIA. LODGE POLE PINE POLES. POSITION STAKES VERTICAL AND AVOID STAKE PLACEMENT THAT CAUSES RUBBING OF BRANCHES AND PIERCING OF ROOT BALL (AS PER SPECS) RUBBER TREE STRAPS. ALLOW FOR MODERATE MOVEMENT TO MINIMIZE DAMAGE TO TREE NATIVE SOIL BACKFILL MIX (AS PER SPECS)EQ.EQ.6" 6" PLAN DRIP LINE ROOTBALL TREE STAKES (TYP) NTS1TREE PLANTINGDEPTH SAMEAS ROOT BALLFINISH GRADE NOTES: 1.SUFFICIENT CLEARANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN PLANTS AND UTILITY FACILITIES SO AS TO NOT HINDER UTILITY MAINTENANCE. 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSURE THAT PLANTS ARE LOCATED SO THAT AT FULL GROWTH PLANTS DO NOT INTERFERE WITH HARDSCAPE SURFACES SUCH AS WALKS AND PATHS. 3.PLANTS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN THEIR NATURAL FORM. OVER PRUNING AND/OR "BALLING" IS PROHIBITED. 4.BLOOMING AGAVES SHALL NOT BE REPLACED UNTIL BLOOM AND STALK ARE COMPLETELY SPENT. 5.BLOOM STALKS OF OTHER ACCENTS SUCH AS DESERT SPOONS AND YUCCAS SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL STALK IS COMPLETELY SPENT. 2 SHRUB & ACCENT PLANTING SCALE: NTS SHRUB ROOTBALL NATIVE SOIL BACKFILL UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE W 3W DEPTH SAME AS ROOTBALL CL CONTAINER GROWN SHRUB SPECIFIED HEIGHTAVERAGE OF ADDITIONAL 25%-30% TALLERCANES ABOVE PSECIFIED HEIGHT.PLANT AT ORIGINAL DEPTH OF BURY. UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE USE NATIVE SOIL FROM ORIGINAL LOCATION OF OCOTILLO FOR BACKFILL. ALTERNATE, USE GOLF SAND OR 14" MINUS DECOMPOSED GRANITE (MAX 12 OF BACKFILL VOLUME). USE MINIMUM (5) 6"-8" ROCKS TO ANCHOR ROOTS IN PLANTING PIT. NOTES: 1.ROOT PRUNE ALL SHREDDED OR DAMAGED ROOTS & DUST ENTIRE ROOT STRUCTURE WITH WETTABLE SULFUR (1.5 MIN) AND STREPTOMYCIN SPRAY AT PLANTING SITE. ROOTBALL SHALL BE 24" MIN WITH A MINIMUM ROOT LENGTH OF 6" ALL SIDES. 2.WATER WITH INSTALLATION AND WATER WEEKLY UNTIL MONSOONS ARRIVE IF TRANSPLANTED BETWEEN MAY-AUGUST. 3.REPLANT IF OCOTILLO BECOMES UNSTABLE DUE TO WIND, RAIN, OVER WATERING, OR ANY OTHER REASON. PLANITNG HOLE WIDTH 3 x DIA. OF ROOTS NTS3OCOTILLO PLANTING SUBGRADE NTS8BOULDER PLACEMENT ALL BOULDERS TO BE SURFACE SELECT, FREE FROM SCARS, CHIPS AND ABRASIONS. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO TREAT ALL DEFECTS WITH 'EONITE' TO PROVIDE A WEATHERED, NATURAL APPEARANCE. DEPRESS BOULDER MASS 1/3 BELOW GRADE AS SHOWN. SURFACE SELECT GRANITE BOULDER2/31/3PLANITNG HOLE WIDTH 3 x DIA. OF ROOTS NTS4SMALL CACTUS INSTALLATION NOTES: 1.ROOT PRUNE ALL SHREDDED OR DAMAGED ROOTS & DUST ENTIRE ROOT STRUCTURE WITH WETTABLE SULFUR (1.5 MIN) AND STREPTOMYCIN SPRAY AT PLANTING SITE. ROOTBALL SHALL BE 24" MIN WITH A MINIMUM ROOT LENGTH OF 6" ALL SIDES. 2.WATER WITH INSTALLATION AND WATER WEEKLY UNTIL MONSOONS ARRIVE IF TRANSPLANTED BETWEEN MAY-AUGUST. 3.REPLANT IF CACTUS BECOMES UNSTABLE DUE TO WIND, RAIN, OVER WATERING, OR ANY OTHER REASON. PLANT AT ORIGINAL DEPTH OF BURY. UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE USE NATIVE SOIL FROM ORIGINAL LOCATION OF CACTUS FOR BACKFILL. ALTERNATE, USE GOLF SAND OR 14" MINUS DECOMPOSED GRANITE (MAX 12 OF BACKFILL VOLUME). USE MINIMUM (5) 6"-8" ROCKS TO ANCHOR ROOTS IN PLANTING PIT. PLANITNG HOLE WIDTH 3 x DIA. OF ROOTS NOTES: 1.ROOT PRUNE ALL SHREDDED OR DAMAGED ROOTS & DUST ENTIRE ROOT STRUCTURE WITH WETTABLE SULFUR (1.5 MIN) AND STREPTOMYCIN SPRAY AT PLANTING SITE. ROOTBALL SHALL BE 24" MIN WITH A MINIMUM ROOT ENGTH OF 6" ALL SIDES. 2.WATER WITH INSTALLATION AND WATER WEEKLY UNTIL MONSOONS ARRIVE IF TRANSPLANTED BETWEEN MAY-AUGUST. 3.REPLANT IF BARREL CACTUS BECOMES UNSTABLE DUE TO WIND, RAIN, OVER WATERING, OR ANY OTHER REASON. PLANT AT ORIGINAL DEPTH OF BURY. UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE USE NATIVE SOIL FROM ORIGINAL LOCATION OF CACTUS FOR BACKFILL. ALTERNATE, USE GOLF SAND OR 1 4" MINUS DECOMPOSED GRANITE (MAX 12 OF BACKFILL VOLUME). USE MINIMUM (5) 6"-8" ROCKS TO ANCHOR ROOTS IN PLANTING PIT. NTS5BARREL CACTUS PLANTING NTS6SAGUARO INSTALLATIONH0.4 x H(TYP)(3) 4"X4" WOOD BRACES SPACED EQUALLY AND NAILED TO WOODEN STAKES IN THE GROUND. BRACE TO REMAIN IN PLACE FOR ONE YEAR MAXIMUM. FINISH GRADE TO SLOPE AWAY FROM BASE OF SAGUARO 2"X4" WOODEN STAKE MIN. 18" LONG SET 6" MAX. ABOVE FINISH GRADE. UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE TRANSPLANTED SAGUARO USE NATIVE SOIL FROM ORIGINAL LOCATION OF SAGUARO FOR BACKFILL. ALTERNATE, USE GOLF SAND OR 14" MINUS DECOMPOSED GRANITE (MAX 12 OF BACKFILL VOLUME). NOTES: 1.ROOT PRUNE ALL SHREDDED OR DAMAGED ROOTS & DUST ENTIRE ROOT STRUCTURE WITH WETTABLE SULFUR (1.5 MIN) AND STREPTOMYCIN SPRAY AT PLANTING SITE. ROOTBALL SHALL BE 24" MIN WITH A MINIMUM ROOT LENGTH OF 6" ALL SIDES. 2.2. CONTRACTOR TO USE ONLY SAGUAROS ORIENTED WITH TRUE NORTH AND LOCATE IN HOLE WITH USE OF COMPASS. 3.TRANSPLANT TO ORIGINAL DEPTH OF BURY. 4.LENGTH OF WOOD BRACES AND DISTANCE FROM BASE WILL VARY WITH HEIGHT AND WEIGHT OF SAGUARO AS WELL AS SLOPE OF GRADE. CUT AND POSITION STAKES AT AN ANGLE TO BEST SUPPORT EACH INDIVIDUAL SAGUARO. 5.DO NOT WATER. 6.REPLANT AND RESTAKE IF SAGUARO BECOMES UNSTABLE DUE TO WIND, RAIN, OVER WATERING, OR ANY OTHER REASON. PLANTING HOLE WIDTH 3 x DIA. OF ROOTS 7 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FENCE SCALE: NTS4'TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FENCING PRODUCT: SAFETY FENCE | PROD ID: 37008365 MFR: SILT MANAGEMENT SUPPLIES (siltmanagementsupplies.com) MATERIAL: 8 LB POLYETHYLENE MESH SIZE: 4 FT HEIGHT COLOR: ORANGE VERTICAL SUPPORT PRODUCT: T-POST | PROD ID: 37272766 MFR: SILT MANAGEMENT SUPPLIES (siltmanagementsupplies.com) MATERIAL: 85 LB RAIL STEEL SIZE: 6 FT HEIGHT NOTES: 1. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FENCING TO BE PLACED AT LIMITS OF GRADING TO PROTECT EXISTING VEGETATION. 2. NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO DETERMINE MATERIAL TYPE APPROPRIATE TO SITE CONSTRUCTION. MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS DENOTE TYPICAL PRODUCT TYPE. 03/07/24 W W BF JB E C C C CEM U M WBF WBF W BFW BFW BF WBF WBF SD SD SD 29 5 7 2958 295 8 295 9 29562 9 5 5 29 5 4 295 3 2 9 5 2 WBF WBF RECREATION RECREATION OPEN SPACE 219-19-4980 RESIDENTIAL 219-19-182A N N 219-19-1950 N N N MANAG E R 265 MAIL / P A C K A G E 272 GYM 266 MEN 278 WOMEN 277 CLUB 273 LEASIN G 274 HALLW A Y 268 OFFIC E 291 POOL E Q P 292 N N N N N N N N N N N N 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 48" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 36" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 36" BOX N N 36" BOX 36" BOX PROJECT BOUNDARY REC AREA#1 POOL/CLUBHOUSE (SEE SHEET #R-6) REC AREA#2 EVENT LAWN /TOT LOT (SEE SHEET #R-7) REC AREA#3 TRAILHEAD CONNECTION (SEE SHEET #R-7) NORTH 0'25'50'100' SCALE: 1"=50' LANDSCAPE PLAN GATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVE A PORTION OF THE S.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, G.&S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA 2203155, 2301138, 2301232 CASE #2301236 I:\PROJECTS\CCD-15\AUTOCAD\WORKING DRAWINGS\CCD-15_LS 2.DWG, 03/07/2024, 11:04 AM, KENDRA POTTERPROJECT: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS/SUBMITTALS DATE# OF CASE NO: REFERENCE: CALL TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG 602-263-1100 1-800-STAKE-IT (OUTSIDE MARICOPA COUNTY) F O R A G E N C Y R E V I E W A N D A P P R O V A L O N L Y . N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N . N O T F O R B I D D I N G THE USE OF PLANS PREPARED BY THE PLANNING CENTER SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE ORIGINAL SITE FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED AND PUBLICATION THEREOF IS LIMITED TO SUCH USE. REPRODUCTION, PUBLICATION OR RE-USE BY ANY METHOD, IN WHOLE OR PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS PROHIBITED. TITLE TO THESE CONCEPTS AND PLANSREMAIN WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WITHOUT PREJUDICE. VISUAL CONTACT WITH THE PLANS SHALL CONSTITUTE PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF THESE RESTRICTIONS. THE DRAWINGS OR CONCEPTS SHALL NOT BE USED IN PART OR IN WHOLE FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT JUST COMPENSATION AND PERMISSION FROM THE PLANNING CENTER.THE PL GCEANNNIN ERT a d i v i i Isooonf nTPCGrup,c. e scr conegtetu osn az 857012600 520.623.6146 520.622.1950 azplanningcenter.comss CCD-15 03/07/24 KDP DB R-1 18 33 DANIEL A. BRADSHAW 58092 E X PIRES 0 6 /3 0 /26THIS SHEET KEY MAP RECREATION AREA & HARDSCAPE PLAN SYNTHETIC TURF INFORMATION TOTAL RECREATION AREA (SQUARE FEET): 34,038 SF PROPOSED SYNTHETIC TURF AREA (SQUARE FEET): 1,454 SF PERCENTAGE OF RECREATION AREA PROPOSED AS SYNTHETIC TURF: 4% RECREATION AREA NOTES TOTAL RECREATION AREA PROVIDED (SQUARE FEET): AREA#1 - POOL / CLUBHOUSE: 11,687 SF PEDESTRIAN PROMENADE: 10,176 SF AREA#2 - EVENT LAWN / TOT LOT: 6,072 SF AREA#3 - TRAILHEAD: 1,998 SF AREA#4 - DOG PARK: 4,038 SF TOTAL: 34,038 SF (APPROX. 0.78 AC) RECREATION AREA DESCRIPTIONS RECREATION AREA #1: POOL / CLUBHOUSE THE POOL AMENITY AREA IS LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE CLUBHOUSE. THIS OUTDOOR SPACE IS ACCESSED FROM A CENTRALIZED DOUBLE DOOR ENTRY BETWEEN THE LEASING CENTER AND GYM. THE SPACE PROVIDES AMENITIES FOR SWIMMING, OUTDOOR DINING, LOUNGING, AND SOCIAL GATHERING WITH DAYTIME AND NIGHTTIME ACTIVITY SPACES. RESTROOMS ARE ACCESSIBLE VIA A SIDE ENTRY TO THE CLUBHOUSE FROM THE POOL AREA. THE MAIN BUILDING ENTRY FOR VISITORS FACES THE SEMICIRCULAR PARKING. AMENITIES POOL WITH FOUNTAIN & HOT TUB DECK & POOL LOUNGE SEATING CHILDREN'S POOL WADING AREA FIRE PIT PERGOLA OUTDOOR KITCHEN COUNTER/GRILL PICNIC TABLES SHADED DINING TABLES SEAT WALLS RAISED PLANTERS DECORATIVE HARDSCAPE THEME COLUMNS ENHANCED VEGETATED LANDSCAPE BIKE PARKING RECREATION AREA #2: EVENT LAWN / TOT LOT AN AREA OF SYNTHETIC TURF IS PROVIDED FOR OUTDOOR EVENTS & ENTERTAINMENT SPACE LOCATED IN THE TRIANGULAR SPACE NEAR THE SOUTHWEST BUILDING. IT CONTAINS A PRIVATE SEATING AREA AND SEAT WALLS FOR REST AND REFLECTION. A SMALL SHADED TOT LOT IS PROVIDED FOR RESIDENTS AND VISITORS CHILDREN'S OUTDOOR RECREATION. AMENITIES LAWN SEAT WALLS APPROX. 515 SF SHADED CHILDREN'S PLAY AREA THEME COLUMNS ENHANCED VEGETATED LANDSCAPE BIKE PARKING RECREATIONAREA 3: TRAILHEAD A TRAILHEAD ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY IS PROVIDED WITH A PATH CONNECTING RESIDENTS TO THE TOWN'S EXISTING MULTI-USE TRAIL. BIKE RACKS AND SEATING ALLOW EASY ACCESSIBILITY AND REST AS NEEDED. AMENITIES SHADED SEAT WALL CONNECTING PATH TO MULTI-USE TRAIL THEME COLUMNS ENHANCED VEGETATED LANDSCAPE *BIKE RACKS *NOTE: AN ADDITIONAL BIKE RACK IS INCORPORATED NEAR THE SOUTH BUILDINGS FOR PRIVATE RESIDENTS' INTERNAL BIKE SECURITY SEPARATE FROM TRAILHEAD. RECREATION AREA #4: DOG PARK A DOG PARK IS PROVIDED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SITE FOR RESIDENTS' PET EXERCISE & RELIEF. APPROXIMATELY 2300 SF OF SECURED RECREATION AREA IS SECURED BY FENCING AND CONTAINS BENCHES FOR OWNER REST. AMENITIES SECURE FENCING DUAL GATED ENTRY APPROX. 2300 SF DOG RUN ENHANCED VEGETATED LANDSCAPE BENCHES PET FOUNTAIN WITH SHOWER PET WASTE STATIONS LEGEND Project Boundary Entry Monument Sign Theme Columns SHEET R-3 SHEET R-4 SHEET R-5 PEDESTRIAN PROMENADE (FOR RECREATION AREA CALCULATION SEE THIS SHEET) DIRECT ACCESS TO VISTOSO TRAILS NATURE PRESERVE REC AREA #4 DOG PARK (SEE SHEET #R-8) UNDISTURBED OPEN SPACE (TO REMAIN) 03/07/24 LANDSCAPE PLAN GATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVE A PORTION OF THE S.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, G.&S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA 2203155, 2301138, 2301232 CASE #2301236 I:\PROJECTS\CCD-15\AUTOCAD\WORKING DRAWINGS\CCD-15_LS 2.DWG, 03/07/2024, 11:04 AM, KENDRA POTTERPROJECT: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS/SUBMITTALS DATE# OF CASE NO: REFERENCE: CALL TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG 602-263-1100 1-800-STAKE-IT (OUTSIDE MARICOPA COUNTY) F O R A G E N C Y R E V I E W A N D A P P R O V A L O N L Y . N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N . N O T F O R B I D D I N G THE USE OF PLANS PREPARED BY THE PLANNING CENTER SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE ORIGINAL SITE FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED AND PUBLICATION THEREOF IS LIMITED TO SUCH USE. REPRODUCTION, PUBLICATION OR RE-USE BY ANY METHOD, IN WHOLE OR PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS PROHIBITED. TITLE TO THESE CONCEPTS AND PLANSREMAIN WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WITHOUT PREJUDICE. VISUAL CONTACT WITH THE PLANS SHALL CONSTITUTE PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF THESE RESTRICTIONS. THE DRAWINGS OR CONCEPTS SHALL NOT BE USED IN PART OR IN WHOLE FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT JUST COMPENSATION AND PERMISSION FROM THE PLANNING CENTER.THE PL GCEANNNIN ERT a d i v i i Isooonf nTPCGrup,c. e scr conegtetu osn az 857012600 520.623.6146 520.622.1950 azplanningcenter.comss CCD-15 03/07/24 KDP DB R-2 19 33 DANIEL A. BRADSHAW 58092 E X PIRES 0 6 /3 0 /26RECREATION AREA & HARDSCAPE PLAN NOTES HARDSCAPE KEY NOTES SYNTHETIC TURF POOL PAVER A POOL PAVER B CONCRETE SIDEWALK CONCRETE HEADER BICYCLE PARKING SURFACE & HEADER RAISED PLANTER SEAT WALL ENTRY MONUMENT SIGN THEME COLUMN THEME WALL ACCENT WALL VIEW FENCE VEHICULAR PAVER SCREEN WALL DOG PARK FENCE AMENITY & SITE FURNISHING KEY NOTES POOL (DESIGNED AND PERMITTED BY OTHERS) HOT TUB (DESIGNED AND PERMITTED BY OTHERS) FIRE PIT PERGOLA OUTDOOR KITCHEN COUNTER/GRILL PICNIC TABLE SHADED DINING TABLE WITH CHAIRS BENCH DECK LOUNGE SEATING AREA POOL LOUNGE SEATING AREA TRASH RECEPTACLE BICYCLE RACK POT PLAY EQUIPMENT (POST & PLATFORM STRUCTURE W/SLIDE) SHADE STRUCTURE PLAY EQUIPMENT (SPRING RIDER) PLAY EQUIPMENT (SPINNER) PET FOUNTAIN WITH SHOWER PET WASTE STATION LANDSCAPE KEY NOTES 3/8" SCREENED ROCK (1 4" MINUS DOG PARK, BIKE, & TRAIL) EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY SCREENED ROCK DECORATIVE RIP-RAP BOULDER (2'X3') BOULDER (3'X4') 100% DESERT COBBLE DECORATIVE ROCK MIX 25% DESERT COBBLE DECORATIVE ROCK MIX & HYDROSEED PLAY SURFACE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 10 11 12 HARDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS (NOTE: ALL PRODUCTS & MATERIALS TO BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS) 1. SYNTHETIC TURF: MFR: SOUTHWEST GREENS OF TUCSON (southwestgreens.com) PRODUCT: BOLT 80 STYLE: GB-042 FACE WEIGHT: 80PILE HEIGHT: 2 IN COLOR: 301 OLIVE BLEND INSTALL ON 1/4" DG OF 3" DEPTH, COMPACTED TO 95%. 2. POOL PAVER A (MAIN AREAS): MFR: ARTISTIC PAVERS (artisticpavers.com) PRODUCT: DESERTLOCK SIZE: 16" x 16" INSTALL: STRAIGHT OFFSET. COLOR: CAPPUCCINO FINISH: POLISHED. 3. POOL PAVER B (ACCENT AREAS) MFR: ARTISTIC PAVERS (artisticpavers.com) PRODUCT: PLANKLOCK SIZE: 8"x 24" INSTALL: STRAIGHT OFFSET, PERPENDICULAR TO MAIN POOL PAVER. COLOR: SAND FINISH: POLISHED. 4. CONCRETE SIDEWALK: STANDARD CONCRETE PAVEMENT (SEE CIVIL PLANS FOR DETAIL.) 5. CONCRETE HEADER: SEE DETAIL 3 SHEET HD-2. 6. BICYCLE PARKING SURFACE & HEADER: SEE DETAILS 4 & 5 SHEET HD-2. 7. RAISED PLANTER: SEE DETAIL 9 SHEET HD-2. 8. SEAT WALL: SEE DETAILS 7 & 8 SHEET HD-2. 9. ENTRY MONUMENT SIGN: SEE DETAIL 3 SHEET HD-3. 10.THEME COLUMN: CMU WITH STONE VENEER ALL SIDES & STONE PAVER CAP. SEE DETAIL 4 SHEET HD-3. STONE VENEER: TO MATCH ACCENT WALL. SEE #12 SPECIFICATION THIS SHEET. STONE PAVER CAP: TO MATCH ACCENT WALL. MFR: ARTISTIC PAVERS (artisticpavers.com) PRODUCT: DESERTLOCK. SIZE: 16"x16". COLOR: CAPPUCCINO. FINISH: POLISHED & ANTIQUED. 11.THEME WALL: CMU WITH STUCCO VENEER ALL SIDES. FINISH: SAND FINISH. COLOR: DE6105 WEATHERED LEATHER LRV27. (TO MATCH ARCHITECTURE TRIM ACCENT) SEE DETAIL 2 SHEET HD-4. 12: ACCENT WALL: CMU WITH STONE VENEER FRONT/ STUCCO VENEER BACK / STONE PAVER CAP & SIDES. STONE VENEER FRONT (EXTERNAL TO SITE, FACING STREET): COLOR/FINISH/SIZE: CLIFFSTONE-MESQUITE (TO MATCH ARCHITECTURE PATIO & TOWER WALLS) STUCCO VENEER BACK (INTERNAL TO SITE): COLOR/FINISH: TO MATCH THEME WALL. SEE #11 SPECIFICATION THIS SHEET. STONE PAVER CAP: TO MATCH PLANTER/FIREPIT CAP. MFR: ARTISTIC PAVERS (artisticpavers.com) PRODUCT: PLANKLOCK. SIZE: 8"x24" COLOR: CAPPUCCINO FINISH: POLISHED & ANTIQUED. 13 VIEW FENCE: CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS. SEE DETAIL 1 & 2 SHEET HD-6. 14. VEHICULAR PAVER (ENTRY PARKING): MFR: BELGARD (belgardcommercial.com). PRODUCT: CAMBRIDGE COBBLE . SIZE 6"x9". INSTALL PATTERN B. COLOR: SIERRA. SEE DETAIL 3 SHEET HD-2. 15. 5' HIGH SCREEN WALL: SPLITFACE MASONRY BLOCK WITH UNIFORM MASONRY BLOCK CAP. SPLIT FACE MASONRY BLOCK: MFR: ECHELON MASONRY. (echelonmasonry.com) PRODUCT: SPLIT FACE MASONRY BLOCK. SIZE: 6"w x 8"h x 16" l. INTEGRAL COLOR: TIERRA BROWN #1. UNIFORM MASONRY BLOCK CAP: MESASTONE UNIFORM MASANRY BLOCK. SIZE: 6"w x 1" h x 16" l. COLOR INTEGRAL: TIERRA BROWN #1. (4102/ GROUP A) SEE DETAIL 1 SHEET HD-4. 16. DOG PARK FENCE: MFR: AMETCO MANUFACTURING CORPORATION (ametco.com) PRODUCT: WELDED WIRE SECURITY FENCE. STYLE: AMOPANEL DESIGN. COLOR: BLACK. AMENITY & SITE FURNISHING SPECIFICATIONS (NOTE: ALL PRODUCTS & MATERIALS TO BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS) 30. POOL: DESIGNED & PERMITTED BY OTHERS. 31. HOT TUB: DESIGNED & PERMITTED BY OTHERS. 32. FIRE PIT: MFR: THE OUTDOOR GREATROOM CO. PRODUCT: CFP1296 B1790. #21 NATURAL GAS BURNER (2 PIECES) 12" X 96" CRYSTAL FIRE PLUS LINEAR BURNER KIT. SEE DETAIL 1 SHEET HD-3. 33. PERGOLA: SEE DETAIL 3 & 4 SHEET HD-6. 34. OUTDOOR KITCHEN COUNTER/GRILL: SEE DETAIL 2 SHEET HD-3. 35. PICNIC TABLE: TO BE DETERMINED BY OWNER. 36. SHADED DINING TABLE WITH CHAIRS: TO BE DETERMINED BY OWNER. 37. BENCH: MFR. FORMS + SURFACES (forms-surfaces.com) PRODUCT: SBCOR-7ANA CORDIA BENCH WITH ALUMINUM SLATS 6' BACKED. SURFACE MOUNT WITH FOOTER. COLOR: POWDER COATED METAL. DARK BRONZE METALLIC TEXTURE. (TO MATCH ARCHITECTURAL RAILING & DOORS DE6385 BLACK BEAN LVR7) 38. DECK LOUNGE SEATING AREA: (11 CHAIRS): TO BE DETERMINED BY OWNER. 39 POOL LOUNGE SEATING AREA (4 CHAIRS): TO BE DETERMINED BY OWNER. 40. TRASH RECEPTACLE: COLOR TO MATCH SITE FURNISHINGS PER OWNER SELECTION. TO BE DETERMINED BY OWNER. 41. BICYCLE RACK: MFR. LANDSCAPE FORMS (landscapeforms.com) PRODUCT: EMERSON BIKE RACK. 4"x20"x30" ARCHITECTURE LINE POWDER COATED METAL. COLOR: ONYX (TO MATCH ARCHITECTURAL RAILINGS & DOORS IN DE6385 BLACK BEAN LVR7.) 42. PLANTER: MFR. Q.C.P. CORP. (qcp-corp.com) PRODUCT: REINFORCED CONCRETE PLANTER PRODUCT ID: QR-CE3036P. STYLE: CASCADE ROUND SIZE: 36" HEIGHT. 25" TOP I.D./30" TOP O.C.COLOR: LATTE. FINISH: HONED. 43. PLAY EQUIPMENT (POST & PLATFORM STRUCTURE WITH INTEGRATED SLIDE): MFR. BLUEGRASS PLAYGROUND INC. PRODUCT: QUICKSHIP STANDARD #1 PLAYGROUND (PERMANENT) PRODUCT ID: 911-249N SIZE: 6' X 12' COLOR: NATURAL COLOR SCHEME. 44 TENSIL SHADE STRUCTURE: MFR:COLOUR TREE (colourtreeusa.com) PRODUCT: RECTANGULAR SUN SHADE SAIL CANOPY, COMMERCIAL GRADE SIZE: 18' x 30' CUSTOM. COLOR: SAND BEIGE. MOUNT TO 12' SUN SHADE SAIL POLE COLOR: PAINT DE6385 BLACK BEAN LVR7 TO MATCH ARCHITECTURAL RAILING AND DOORS. 45. PLAY EQUIPMENT (SPRING RIDER): MFR: LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES (playlsi.com) PRODUCT: BOBBLE SINGLE RIDER. PROD ID: MODEL#164074. PLAY ZONE: 13'-6" x 15'. 46. PLAY EQUIPMENT (SPINNER): MFR: LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES (playlsi.com) PRODUCT: STANDUP SPINNER. PROD ID: MODEL#155077. PLAY ZONE: 14' DIAM. 47. PET FOUNTAIN WITH SHOWER: MFR: DOG-ON-IT-PARKS (dog-on-it-parks.com) PRODUCT: PET FOUNTAIN WITH SHOWER. PROD ID: 7218. FINISH: ENVIRO GLAZE. COLOR: EG-07 ONYX (BLACK). 48. PET WASTE STATION. MFR: DOG-ON-IT-PARKS (dog-on-it-parks.com) PRODUCT: COMPLETE DOG WASTE STATION - SINGLE PULL. PROD ID: 7408S. STYLE: ROUND. COLOR: BLACK. LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS: (NOTE: ALL PRODUCTS & MATERIALS TO BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS) 70. SMALL ROCK: MFR: KALAMAZOO MATERIALS. LANDSCAPE AREAS: SIZE: 3/8" SCREENED. COLOR: PALOMINO CORAL. INSTALL AT DEPTH OF 2" MIN. WITH SURFACE 1" BELOW HARDSCAPE SURFACE. TRAIL CONNECTION & BICYCLE PARKING: SIZE: 1/4" MINUS. COLOR: APACHE ROSE. INSTALL AT DEPTH OF 2" MIN. WITH SURFACE 1" BELOW HARDSCAPE SURFACE. SEE DETAIL 5 SHEET HD-1. (SEATING) SEE DETAIL 5 SHEET HD-2. (BICYCLE PARKING) DOG PARK: SIZE: 1/4" MINUS.COLOR: PALOMINO CORAL. INSTALL AT DEPTH OF 4" WITH SURFACE 1" BELOW HARDSCAPE SURFACE. BOTTOM 2" STABLIZED. TOP 2" NON-STABILIZED. INSTALLED IN 1" LIFTS. 71. *EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY SCREENED ROCK: CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY EXISTING SCREENED ROCK SIZE AND COLOR TO MATCH. INSTALL AT DEPTH OF 2" MIN WITH SURFACE 1" BELOW HARDSCAPE SURFACE. 72. DECORATIVE RIP-RAP: KALAMAZOO MATERIALS. SIZE: 2"-4" RIP-RAP. COLOR: APACHE GOLD. INSTALL AT DEPTH OF 2" MIN. WITH SURFACE 1" BELOW HARDSCAPE SURFACE. SEE DETAIL 2 SHEET HD-1. 73. BOULDER (2'X3'): KALAMAZOO MATERIALS. SIZE: 2'x3'. COLOR: APACHE GOLD. INSTALL: BURY BOTTOM 1/3 BELOW GRADE. SEE DETAIL 8 SHEET LD-1. 74. BOULDER (3'X4'): KALAMAZOO MATERIALS. SIZE: 3'x4'. COLOR: APACHE GOLD. INSTALL: BURY BOTTOM 1/3 BELOW GRADE. SEE DETAIL 8 SHEET LD-1. 75. 100% DESERT COBBLE ROCK MIX: MFR: KALAMAZOO MATERIALS. [(40%) 3/8" MINUS ROCK. COLOR: APACHE GOLD. + (25%) 1" SCREENED ROCK. COLOR: SILVERBELL APACHE GOLD. + (20%) 2" SCREENED ROCK. COLOR: SILVERBELL APACHE GOLD. + (15%) 2" TO 4" RIP-RAP. COLOR: APACHE GOLD.] APPLY AT 100% COVERAGE. SEE DETAIL 6 SHEET HD-1. 76. 25% DESERT COBBLE ROCK MIX & HYDROSEED MIX: MFR: KALAMAZOO MATERIALS. INSTALL: 25% SURFACE COVERAGE OF DESERT COBBLE MIX WITH 100% HYDROSEED SURFACE COVERAGE.(SEE DESERT COBBLE ROCK MIX FOR TYPE, SIZE, & QUANTITY MIXTURE OF ROCK MULCH.) COLOR: SEE #75. SEE HYDROSEED MIX ON SHEET LS-4 LANDSCAPE PLAN NOTES. 77. HYDROSEED MIX: INSTALL: APPLY AT SOUTH & SOUTHEAST SIDE OF SOUTH PARKING LOT. SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN NOTES SHEET LS-4. 78. PLAY SURFACE: MFR: ACME SAND & GRAVEL (acemsand.com) ENGINEERED WOOD FIBER CHIPS. PRODUCT ID: PWCHP. FIBER: NATURAL NO CHEMICAL TREATMENT. COLOR: NATURAL. MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS NOTE: SPECIFICATION NUMBER MATCHES NUMBER OF KEY NOTE ON LANDSCAPE RECREATION & HARDSCAPE PLANS (SEE THIS PAGE FOR LEGEND.) KEY NOTES: * NOTE: 1. EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY AT LOCATION NOTED AS RIGHT-OF-WAY LANDSCAPE ON PLAN. 2. THEME WALLS & ACCENT WALLS SERVE AS MIN. 5 FOOT SCREEN WALLS. 13 42 43 44 14 15 16 45 46 47 48 03/07/24 W W BF JB C C U WBF SD 29 5 7 2958 295 8 295 9 29562 9 5 5 29 5 4 295 3 WBF N N N N N N N N N N N 48" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 36" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 36" BOX N N 36" BOX 36" BOX 0'15'30'60' SCALE: 1"=30' NORTH LANDSCAPE PLAN GATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVE A PORTION OF THE S.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, G.&S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA 2203155, 2301138, 2301232 CASE #2301236 I:\PROJECTS\CCD-15\AUTOCAD\WORKING DRAWINGS\CCD-15_LS 2.DWG, 03/07/2024, 11:04 AM, KENDRA POTTERPROJECT: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS/SUBMITTALS DATE# OF CASE NO: REFERENCE: CALL TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG 602-263-1100 1-800-STAKE-IT (OUTSIDE MARICOPA COUNTY) F O R A G E N C Y R E V I E W A N D A P P R O V A L O N L Y . N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N . N O T F O R B I D D I N G THE USE OF PLANS PREPARED BY THE PLANNING CENTER SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE ORIGINAL SITE FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED AND PUBLICATION THEREOF IS LIMITED TO SUCH USE. REPRODUCTION, PUBLICATION OR RE-USE BY ANY METHOD, IN WHOLE OR PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS PROHIBITED. TITLE TO THESE CONCEPTS AND PLANSREMAIN WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WITHOUT PREJUDICE. VISUAL CONTACT WITH THE PLANS SHALL CONSTITUTE PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF THESE RESTRICTIONS. THE DRAWINGS OR CONCEPTS SHALL NOT BE USED IN PART OR IN WHOLE FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT JUST COMPENSATION AND PERMISSION FROM THE PLANNING CENTER.THE PL GCEANNNIN ERT a d i v i i Isooonf nTPCGrup,c. e scr conegtetu osn az 857012600 520.623.6146 520.622.1950 azplanningcenter.comss CCD-15 03/07/24 KDP DB R-3 20 33 DANIEL A. BRADSHAW 58092 E X PIRES 0 6 /3 0 /26MATCHLINE SHEET R-4MATCHLINE SHEET R-5THIS SHEET KEY MAP APARTMENT VEHICULAR ENTRY RECREATION 219-19-1950 BUFFERYARD "A" 15' WIDE 15'LEGEND HARDSCAPE & GROUNDCOVER 3 8" Screened Rock (1 4" Minus at Dog Park, Bike, & Trail) Right-of-Way Screened Rock Rip-Rap 25 % Desert Cobble Mix & Hydroseed 100% Desert Cobble Mix Decorative Pavers A Decorative Pavers B Concrete Sidewalk Synthetic Turf Project Boundary RECREATION AREA & HARDSCAPE PLAN 11 11 12 11 12 11 70 7473 15 75 15 6 41 75 75 75 75 70 75 70 73 71 12 71 71 75 75 70 70 74 73 75 70 75 70 74 74 73 73 74 73 70 7570 707574 73 74 70 75 70 75 70 70 41 6 7573 74 75 76 76 15 15 15 11 11 76 75 74 73 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 70 75 75 76 PROJECT BOUNDARY 71 12 71 11 73 74 73 75 75 10 10 76 76 UNKNOWN WASH (2,000 - 5,000 cfs) 100YR FLOODPLAIN UNDISTURBED OPEN SPACE (TO REMAIN) HARDSCAPE KEY NOTES SYNTHETIC TURF POOL PAVER A POOL PAVER B CONCRETE SIDEWALK CONCRETE HEADER BICYCLE PARKING SURFACE & HEADER RAISED PLANTER SEAT WALL ENTRY MONUMENT SIGN THEME COLUMN THEME WALL ACCENT WALL VIEW FENCE VEHICULAR PAVER SCREEN WALL DOG PARK FENCE AMENITY & SITE FURNISHING KEY NOTES POOL (DESIGNED AND PERMITTED BY OTHERS) HOT TUB (DESIGNED AND PERMITTED BY OTHERS) FIRE PIT PERGOLA OUTDOOR KITCHEN COUNTER/GRILL PICNIC TABLE SHADED DINING TABLE WITH CHAIRS BENCH DECK LOUNGE SEATING AREA POOL LOUNGE SEATING AREA TRASH RECEPTACLE BICYCLE RACK POT PLAY EQUIPMENT (POST & PLATFORM STRUCTURE W/SLIDE) SHADE STRUCTURE PLAY EQUIPMENT (SPRING RIDER) PLAY EQUIPMENT (SPINNER) PET FOUNTAIN WITH SHOWER PET WASTE STATION LANDSCAPE KEY NOTES 3/8" SCREENED ROCK (1 4" MINUS DOG PARK, BIKE, & TRAIL) EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY SCREENED ROCK DECORATIVE RIP-RAP BOULDER (2'X3') BOULDER (3'X4') 100% DESERT COBBLE DECORATIVE ROCK MIX 25% DESERT COBBLE DECORATIVE ROCK MIX & HYDROSEED PLAY SURFACE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 10 11 12 KEY NOTES: 13 42 43 44 14 15 16 45 46 47 48 03/07/24 11 E C CEM M WBF WBF W BFW BFWBF WBF SD SD SD WBF MANA G E R 265 MAIL / P A C K A G E 272 GYM 266 MEN 278 WOM E N 277 CLUB 273 LEASI N G 274 HALL W A Y 268 OFFIC E 291 POOL E Q P 292 N N N 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX LANDSCAPE PLAN GATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVE A PORTION OF THE S.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, G.&S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA 2203155, 2301138, 2301232 CASE #2301236 I:\PROJECTS\CCD-15\AUTOCAD\WORKING DRAWINGS\CCD-15_LS 2.DWG, 03/07/2024, 11:04 AM, KENDRA POTTERPROJECT: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS/SUBMITTALS DATE# OF CASE NO: REFERENCE: CALL TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG 602-263-1100 1-800-STAKE-IT (OUTSIDE MARICOPA COUNTY) F O R A G E N C Y R E V I E W A N D A P P R O V A L O N L Y . N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N . N O T F O R B I D D I N G THE USE OF PLANS PREPARED BY THE PLANNING CENTER SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE ORIGINAL SITE FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED AND PUBLICATION THEREOF IS LIMITED TO SUCH USE. REPRODUCTION, PUBLICATION OR RE-USE BY ANY METHOD, IN WHOLE OR PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS PROHIBITED. TITLE TO THESE CONCEPTS AND PLANSREMAIN WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WITHOUT PREJUDICE. VISUAL CONTACT WITH THE PLANS SHALL CONSTITUTE PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF THESE RESTRICTIONS. THE DRAWINGS OR CONCEPTS SHALL NOT BE USED IN PART OR IN WHOLE FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT JUST COMPENSATION AND PERMISSION FROM THE PLANNING CENTER.THE PL GCEANNNIN ERT a d i v i i Isooonf nTPCGrup,c. e scr conegtetu osn az 857012600 520.623.6146 520.622.1950 azplanningcenter.comss CCD-15 03/07/24 KDP DB R-4 21 33 DANIEL A. BRADSHAW 58092 E X PIRES 0 6 /3 0 /26MATCHLINE SHEET R-3MATCHLINE SHEET R-3MATCHLINE SHEET R-5 NORTH 0'15'30'60' SCALE: 1"=30' THIS SHEET KEY MAP APARTMENT VEHICULAR ENTRY OPEN SPACE 219-19-182A OPEN SPACE 219-19-1890 VISTOSO HIGHLANDS HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 219-19-1150 BUFFERYARD "A" 15' WIDE 15'RIGHT-OF-WAY LANDSCAPE TO MITIGATE DISTURBED EXISTING RECREATION AREA & HARDSCAPE PLAN 74 73 73 74 73 73 73 73 74 73 74 73 73 74 73 73 7473 74 73 74 73 74 73 73 70 74 73 74 74 73 74 73 73 74 73 74 73 73 74 73 74 73 74 7374 73 74 73 73 74 74 73 73 73 74 73 74 11 12 11 11 12 12 11 70 75 70 70 75 75 75 76 76 70 70 75 75 70 70 75 70 70 75 70 75 70 70 70 75 70 70 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 15 15 15 11 11 12 70 75 70 70 75 75 7570 75 73 75 75 75 75 70 75 75 70 70 75 70 70 70 70 75 70 75 76 71 71 71 71 71 4 737374 70 747075 75 75 41 6 14 72 76 75 7473 73 74 73 73 75 75 70 9 73 73 76 15 37 70 70 37 12 75 70 75 74 73 70 4 437 37 40 70 75 73 74 73 76 74 70 7473 74 74 73 73 74 74 73 70 7473 4 7374 74 75 75 70 73 70 70 70 70 70 75 70 70 75 70 75 73 UNKNOWN WASH (2,000 - 5,000 cfs) 100YR FLOODPLAIN PROJECT BOUNDARY HARDSCAPE KEY NOTES SYNTHETIC TURF POOL PAVER A POOL PAVER B CONCRETE SIDEWALK CONCRETE HEADER BICYCLE PARKING SURFACE & HEADER RAISED PLANTER SEAT WALL ENTRY MONUMENT SIGN THEME COLUMN THEME WALL ACCENT WALL VIEW FENCE VEHICULAR PAVER SCREEN WALL DOG PARK FENCE AMENITY & SITE FURNISHING KEY NOTES POOL (DESIGNED AND PERMITTED BY OTHERS) HOT TUB (DESIGNED AND PERMITTED BY OTHERS) FIRE PIT PERGOLA OUTDOOR KITCHEN COUNTER/GRILL PICNIC TABLE SHADED DINING TABLE WITH CHAIRS BENCH DECK LOUNGE SEATING AREA POOL LOUNGE SEATING AREA TRASH RECEPTACLE BICYCLE RACK POT PLAY EQUIPMENT (POST & PLATFORM STRUCTURE W/SLIDE) SHADE STRUCTURE PLAY EQUIPMENT (SPRING RIDER) PLAY EQUIPMENT (SPINNER) PET FOUNTAIN WITH SHOWER PET WASTE STATION LANDSCAPE KEY NOTES 3/8" SCREENED ROCK (1 4" MINUS DOG PARK, BIKE, & TRAIL) EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY SCREENED ROCK DECORATIVE RIP-RAP BOULDER (2'X3') BOULDER (3'X4') 100% DESERT COBBLE DECORATIVE ROCK MIX 25% DESERT COBBLE DECORATIVE ROCK MIX & HYDROSEED PLAY SURFACE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 10 11 12 KEY NOTES: 13 42 43 44 14 15 16 45 46 47 48 03/07/24 LEGEND HARDSCAPE & GROUNDCOVER 3 8" Screened Rock (1 4" Minus at Dog Park, Bike, & Trail) Right-of-Way Screened Rock Rip-Rap 25 % Desert Cobble Mix & Hydroseed 100% Desert Cobble Mix Decorative Pavers A Decorative Pavers B Concrete Sidewalk Synthetic Turf Project Boundary N N N N N N N 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX LANDSCAPE PLAN GATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVE A PORTION OF THE S.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, G.&S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA 2203155, 2301138, 2301232 CASE #2301236 I:\PROJECTS\CCD-15\AUTOCAD\WORKING DRAWINGS\CCD-15_LS 2.DWG, 03/07/2024, 11:04 AM, KENDRA POTTERPROJECT: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS/SUBMITTALS DATE# OF CASE NO: REFERENCE: CALL TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG 602-263-1100 1-800-STAKE-IT (OUTSIDE MARICOPA COUNTY) F O R A G E N C Y R E V I E W A N D A P P R O V A L O N L Y . N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N . N O T F O R B I D D I N G THE USE OF PLANS PREPARED BY THE PLANNING CENTER SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE ORIGINAL SITE FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED AND PUBLICATION THEREOF IS LIMITED TO SUCH USE. REPRODUCTION, PUBLICATION OR RE-USE BY ANY METHOD, IN WHOLE OR PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS PROHIBITED. TITLE TO THESE CONCEPTS AND PLANSREMAIN WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WITHOUT PREJUDICE. VISUAL CONTACT WITH THE PLANS SHALL CONSTITUTE PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF THESE RESTRICTIONS. THE DRAWINGS OR CONCEPTS SHALL NOT BE USED IN PART OR IN WHOLE FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT JUST COMPENSATION AND PERMISSION FROM THE PLANNING CENTER.THE PL GCEANNNIN ERT a d i v i i Isooonf nTPCGrup,c. e scr conegtetu osn az 857012600 520.623.6146 520.622.1950 azplanningcenter.comss CCD-15 03/07/24 KDP DB R-5 22 33 DANIEL A. BRADSHAW 58092 E X PIRES 0 6 /3 0 /26MATCHLINE SHEET R-3MATCHLINE SHEET R-4 NORTH 0'15'30'60' SCALE: 1"=30' THIS SHEET KEY MAP WATER HARVESTING BASINWATER HARVESTING BASIN RECREATION 219-19-1950 OPEN SPACE 219-19-1890 TRAIL CONNECTION (SEE CIVIL PLANS) NOTE: HYDROSEED MIX TO BE APPLIED IN DISTURBED OPEN SPACE ON SOUTH SIDE OF PROPERTY. RECREATION AREA & HARDSCAPE PLAN 70 7075 70 70 75 70 70 75 70 70 76 76 76 76 76 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 7570 75 70 641 73 73 74 74 74 74 73 73 74 73 74 73 15 75 15 15 15 15 75 73 70 UNKNOWN WASH (2,000 - 5,000 cfs) 100YR FLOODPLAIN PROJECT BOUNDARY ROCK OUTCROPPING UNDISTURBED OPEN SPACE (TO REMAIN) HARDSCAPE KEY NOTES SYNTHETIC TURF POOL PAVER A POOL PAVER B CONCRETE SIDEWALK CONCRETE HEADER BICYCLE PARKING SURFACE & HEADER RAISED PLANTER SEAT WALL ENTRY MONUMENT SIGN THEME COLUMN THEME WALL ACCENT WALL VIEW FENCE VEHICULAR PAVER SCREEN WALL DOG PARK FENCE AMENITY & SITE FURNISHING KEY NOTES POOL (DESIGNED AND PERMITTED BY OTHERS) HOT TUB (DESIGNED AND PERMITTED BY OTHERS) FIRE PIT PERGOLA OUTDOOR KITCHEN COUNTER/GRILL PICNIC TABLE SHADED DINING TABLE WITH CHAIRS BENCH DECK LOUNGE SEATING AREA POOL LOUNGE SEATING AREA TRASH RECEPTACLE BICYCLE RACK POT PLAY EQUIPMENT (POST & PLATFORM STRUCTURE W/SLIDE) SHADE STRUCTURE PLAY EQUIPMENT (SPRING RIDER) PLAY EQUIPMENT (SPINNER) PET FOUNTAIN WITH SHOWER PET WASTE STATION LANDSCAPE KEY NOTES 3/8" SCREENED ROCK (1 4" MINUS DOG PARK, BIKE, & TRAIL) EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY SCREENED ROCK DECORATIVE RIP-RAP BOULDER (2'X3') BOULDER (3'X4') 100% DESERT COBBLE DECORATIVE ROCK MIX 25% DESERT COBBLE DECORATIVE ROCK MIX & HYDROSEED PLAY SURFACE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 10 11 12 KEY NOTES: 13 42 43 44 14 15 16 45 46 47 48 03/07/24 LEGEND HARDSCAPE & GROUNDCOVER 3 8" Screened Rock (1 4" Minus at Dog Park, Bike, & Trail) Right-of-Way Screened Rock Rip-Rap 25 % Desert Cobble Mix & Hydroseed 100% Desert Cobble Mix Decorative Pavers A Decorative Pavers B Concrete Sidewalk Synthetic Turf Project Boundary WB F WB F SD MAN A G E R 265 MAIL / P A C K A G E 272 GYM 266 MEN 278 WOM E N 277 CLU B 273 LEAS I N G 274 HALL W A Y 268 OFFI C E 291 POO L E Q P 292 NORTH 0'5'10'20' SCALE: 1"=10' LANDSCAPE PLAN GATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVE A PORTION OF THE S.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, G.&S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA 2203155, 2301138, 2301232 CASE #2301236 I:\PROJECTS\CCD-15\AUTOCAD\WORKING DRAWINGS\CCD-15_LS 2.DWG, 03/07/2024, 11:04 AM, KENDRA POTTERPROJECT: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS/SUBMITTALS DATE# OF CASE NO: REFERENCE: CALL TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG 602-263-1100 1-800-STAKE-IT (OUTSIDE MARICOPA COUNTY) F O R A G E N C Y R E V I E W A N D A P P R O V A L O N L Y . N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N . N O T F O R B I D D I N G THE USE OF PLANS PREPARED BY THE PLANNING CENTER SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE ORIGINAL SITE FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED AND PUBLICATION THEREOF IS LIMITED TO SUCH USE. REPRODUCTION, PUBLICATION OR RE-USE BY ANY METHOD, IN WHOLE OR PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS PROHIBITED. TITLE TO THESE CONCEPTS AND PLANSREMAIN WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WITHOUT PREJUDICE. VISUAL CONTACT WITH THE PLANS SHALL CONSTITUTE PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF THESE RESTRICTIONS. THE DRAWINGS OR CONCEPTS SHALL NOT BE USED IN PART OR IN WHOLE FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT JUST COMPENSATION AND PERMISSION FROM THE PLANNING CENTER.THE PL GCEANNNIN ERT a d i v i i Isooonf nTPCGrup,c. e scr conegtetu osn az 857012600 520.623.6146 520.622.1950 azplanningcenter.comss CCD-15 03/07/24 KDP DB R-6 23 33 DANIEL A. BRADSHAW 58092 E X PIRES 0 6 /3 0 /26KEY MAP RECREATION AREA #1 COMMUNITY CENTER GYM & LEASING OFFICE BUILDING ENTRY RECREATION AREA #1 POOL THIS SHEET POOL SIGNAGE & SAFETY EQUIPMENT POOL & HOT TUB BY OTHERS BUILDING ENTRY BUILDING ENTRY 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 6 41 7 7 38 30 39 31 39 POOL SHELF 40 35 34 36 7 32 42 72 38 72 11 13 11 70 7 70 42 13GATED ENTRY 2 2 8 74 70 72 70 70 70 70 42 2 3 70 11 13 13 11 13 10 4 70 75 75 75 75 75 75 4 13 13 11 12 11 12 11 11 11 3 3 3 8 4 75 75 70 42 70 72 14 15 71 71 71 73 74 70 74 73 70 74 73 75 73 74 73 74 73 74 73 73 7374 4 4 73 73 73 74 18" TALL POOL WALL W/CASCADE WATER FEATURE POOL SHELF 13 73 74 73 75 70 70 75 73 HARDSCAPE KEY NOTES SYNTHETIC TURF POOL PAVER A POOL PAVER B CONCRETE SIDEWALK CONCRETE HEADER BICYCLE PARKING SURFACE & HEADER RAISED PLANTER SEAT WALL ENTRY MONUMENT SIGN THEME COLUMN THEME WALL ACCENT WALL VIEW FENCE VEHICULAR PAVER SCREEN WALL DOG PARK FENCE AMENITY & SITE FURNISHING KEY NOTES POOL (DESIGNED AND PERMITTED BY OTHERS) HOT TUB (DESIGNED AND PERMITTED BY OTHERS) FIRE PIT PERGOLA OUTDOOR KITCHEN COUNTER/GRILL PICNIC TABLE SHADED DINING TABLE WITH CHAIRS BENCH DECK LOUNGE SEATING AREA POOL LOUNGE SEATING AREA TRASH RECEPTACLE BICYCLE RACK POT PLAY EQUIPMENT (POST & PLATFORM STRUCTURE W/SLIDE) SHADE STRUCTURE PLAY EQUIPMENT (SPRING RIDER) PLAY EQUIPMENT (SPINNER) PET FOUNTAIN WITH SHOWER PET WASTE STATION LANDSCAPE KEY NOTES 3/8" SCREENED ROCK (1 4" MINUS DOG PARK, BIKE, & TRAIL) EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY SCREENED ROCK DECORATIVE RIP-RAP BOULDER (2'X3') BOULDER (3'X4') 100% DESERT COBBLE DECORATIVE ROCK MIX 25% DESERT COBBLE DECORATIVE ROCK MIX & HYDROSEED PLAY SURFACE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 10 11 12 KEY NOTES: 13 42 43 44 14 15 16 45 46 47 48 03/07/24 LEGEND HARDSCAPE & GROUNDCOVER 3 8" Screened Rock (1 4" Minus at Dog Park, Bike, & Trail) Right-of-Way Screened Rock Rip-Rap 25 % Desert Cobble Mix & Hydroseed 100% Desert Cobble Mix Decorative Pavers A Decorative Pavers B Concrete Sidewalk Synthetic Turf Project Boundary 2 9 5 7 N 36" BOX N N 36" BOX NORTH 0'4'8'16' SCALE: 1"=8' LANDSCAPE PLAN GATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVE A PORTION OF THE S.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, G.&S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA 2203155, 2301138, 2301232 CASE #2301236 I:\PROJECTS\CCD-15\AUTOCAD\WORKING DRAWINGS\CCD-15_LS 2.DWG, 03/07/2024, 11:04 AM, KENDRA POTTERPROJECT: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS/SUBMITTALS DATE# OF CASE NO: REFERENCE: CALL TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG 602-263-1100 1-800-STAKE-IT (OUTSIDE MARICOPA COUNTY) F O R A G E N C Y R E V I E W A N D A P P R O V A L O N L Y . N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N . N O T F O R B I D D I N G THE USE OF PLANS PREPARED BY THE PLANNING CENTER SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE ORIGINAL SITE FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED AND PUBLICATION THEREOF IS LIMITED TO SUCH USE. REPRODUCTION, PUBLICATION OR RE-USE BY ANY METHOD, IN WHOLE OR PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS PROHIBITED. TITLE TO THESE CONCEPTS AND PLANSREMAIN WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WITHOUT PREJUDICE. VISUAL CONTACT WITH THE PLANS SHALL CONSTITUTE PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF THESE RESTRICTIONS. THE DRAWINGS OR CONCEPTS SHALL NOT BE USED IN PART OR IN WHOLE FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT JUST COMPENSATION AND PERMISSION FROM THE PLANNING CENTER.THE PL GCEANNNIN ERT a d i v i i Isooonf nTPCGrup,c. e scr conegtetu osn az 857012600 520.623.6146 520.622.1950 azplanningcenter.comss CCD-15 03/07/24 KDP DB R-7 24 33 DANIEL A. BRADSHAW 58092 E X PIRES 0 6 /3 0 /26KEY MAP RECREATION AREAS #2 & #3 RECREATION AREA #2 EVENT LAWN THIS SHEET RECREATION AREA #3 TRAILHEAD 10 8 41 6 76 4 76 73 74 76 75 1 75 5 8 74 73 5 8 5 8 5 74 73 73 74 73 74 74 73 74 73 70 70 75 75 75 4 4 4 75 1 5 46 45 43 44 77 5 5 40 48 15 15 75 76 4 4 HARDSCAPE KEY NOTES SYNTHETIC TURF POOL PAVER A POOL PAVER B CONCRETE SIDEWALK CONCRETE HEADER BICYCLE PARKING SURFACE & HEADER RAISED PLANTER SEAT WALL ENTRY MONUMENT SIGN THEME COLUMN THEME WALL ACCENT WALL VIEW FENCE VEHICULAR PAVER SCREEN WALL DOG PARK FENCE AMENITY & SITE FURNISHING KEY NOTES POOL (DESIGNED AND PERMITTED BY OTHERS) HOT TUB (DESIGNED AND PERMITTED BY OTHERS) FIRE PIT PERGOLA OUTDOOR KITCHEN COUNTER/GRILL PICNIC TABLE SHADED DINING TABLE WITH CHAIRS BENCH DECK LOUNGE SEATING AREA POOL LOUNGE SEATING AREA TRASH RECEPTACLE BICYCLE RACK POT PLAY EQUIPMENT (POST & PLATFORM STRUCTURE W/SLIDE) SHADE STRUCTURE PLAY EQUIPMENT (SPRING RIDER) PLAY EQUIPMENT (SPINNER) PET FOUNTAIN WITH SHOWER PET WASTE STATION LANDSCAPE KEY NOTES 3/8" SCREENED ROCK (1 4" MINUS DOG PARK, BIKE, & TRAIL) EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY SCREENED ROCK DECORATIVE RIP-RAP BOULDER (2'X3') BOULDER (3'X4') 100% DESERT COBBLE DECORATIVE ROCK MIX 25% DESERT COBBLE DECORATIVE ROCK MIX & HYDROSEED PLAY SURFACE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 10 11 12 KEY NOTES: 13 42 43 44 14 15 16 45 46 47 48 03/07/24 LEGEND HARDSCAPE & GROUNDCOVER 3 8" Screened Rock (1 4" Minus at Dog Park, Bike, & Trail) Right-of-Way Screened Rock Rip-Rap 25 % Desert Cobble Mix & Hydroseed 100% Desert Cobble Mix Decorative Pavers A Decorative Pavers B Concrete Sidewalk Synthetic Turf Project Boundary NORTH 0'4'8'16' SCALE: 1"=8' LANDSCAPE PLAN GATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVE A PORTION OF THE S.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, G.&S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA 2203155, 2301138, 2301232 CASE #2301236 I:\PROJECTS\CCD-15\AUTOCAD\WORKING DRAWINGS\CCD-15_LS 2.DWG, 03/07/2024, 11:04 AM, KENDRA POTTERPROJECT: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS/SUBMITTALS DATE# OF CASE NO: REFERENCE: CALL TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG 602-263-1100 1-800-STAKE-IT (OUTSIDE MARICOPA COUNTY) F O R A G E N C Y R E V I E W A N D A P P R O V A L O N L Y . N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N . N O T F O R B I D D I N G THE USE OF PLANS PREPARED BY THE PLANNING CENTER SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE ORIGINAL SITE FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED AND PUBLICATION THEREOF IS LIMITED TO SUCH USE. REPRODUCTION, PUBLICATION OR RE-USE BY ANY METHOD, IN WHOLE OR PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS PROHIBITED. TITLE TO THESE CONCEPTS AND PLANSREMAIN WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WITHOUT PREJUDICE. VISUAL CONTACT WITH THE PLANS SHALL CONSTITUTE PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF THESE RESTRICTIONS. THE DRAWINGS OR CONCEPTS SHALL NOT BE USED IN PART OR IN WHOLE FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT JUST COMPENSATION AND PERMISSION FROM THE PLANNING CENTER.THE PL GCEANNNIN ERT a d i v i i Isooonf nTPCGrup,c. e scr conegtetu osn az 857012600 520.623.6146 520.622.1950 azplanningcenter.comss CCD-15 03/07/24 KDP DB R-8 25 33 DANIEL A. BRADSHAW 58092 E X PIRES 0 6 /3 0 /26KEY MAP RECREATION AREA #4 RECREATION AREA #4 DOG PARK THIS SHEET 16 70 75 75 48 37 37 37 48 71 47 11 11 76 76 76 17 17 40 41 6 70 75 74 73 74 73 4 4 4 75 75 UNDISTURBED OPEN SPACE (TO REMAIN) HARDSCAPE KEY NOTES SYNTHETIC TURF POOL PAVER A POOL PAVER B CONCRETE SIDEWALK CONCRETE HEADER BICYCLE PARKING SURFACE & HEADER RAISED PLANTER SEAT WALL ENTRY MONUMENT SIGN THEME COLUMN THEME WALL ACCENT WALL VIEW FENCE VEHICULAR PAVER SCREEN WALL DOG PARK FENCE AMENITY & SITE FURNISHING KEY NOTES POOL (DESIGNED AND PERMITTED BY OTHERS) HOT TUB (DESIGNED AND PERMITTED BY OTHERS) FIRE PIT PERGOLA OUTDOOR KITCHEN COUNTER/GRILL PICNIC TABLE SHADED DINING TABLE WITH CHAIRS BENCH DECK LOUNGE SEATING AREA POOL LOUNGE SEATING AREA TRASH RECEPTACLE BICYCLE RACK POT PLAY EQUIPMENT (POST & PLATFORM STRUCTURE W/SLIDE) SHADE STRUCTURE PLAY EQUIPMENT (SPRING RIDER) PLAY EQUIPMENT (SPINNER) PET FOUNTAIN WITH SHOWER PET WASTE STATION LANDSCAPE KEY NOTES 3/8" SCREENED ROCK (1 4" MINUS DOG PARK, BIKE, & TRAIL) EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY SCREENED ROCK DECORATIVE RIP-RAP BOULDER (2'X3') BOULDER (3'X4') 100% DESERT COBBLE DECORATIVE ROCK MIX 25% DESERT COBBLE DECORATIVE ROCK MIX & HYDROSEED PLAY SURFACE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 10 11 12 KEY NOTES: 13 42 43 44 14 15 16 45 46 47 48 03/07/24 11 11 11 LEGEND HARDSCAPE & GROUNDCOVER 3 8" Screened Rock (1 4" Minus at Dog Park, Bike, & Trail) Right-of-Way Screened Rock Rip-Rap 25 % Desert Cobble Mix & Hydroseed 100% Desert Cobble Mix Decorative Pavers A Decorative Pavers B Concrete Sidewalk Synthetic Turf Project Boundary W W BF JB E C C C CEM U M WBF WBF W BFW BFW BF WBF WBF SD SD SD 29 5 7 2958 295 8 295 9 29562 9 5 5 29 5 4 295 3 2 9 5 2 WBF WBF RECREATION RECREATION OPEN SPACE 219-19-4980 RESIDENTIAL 219-19-182A N N 219-19-1950 N N N MANAG E R 265 MAIL / P A C K A G E 272 GYM 266 MEN 278 WOMEN 277 CLUB 273 LEASIN G 274 HALLW A Y 268 OFFIC E 291 POOL E Q P 292 N N N N N N N N N N N N 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 48" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 36" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 36" BOX N N 36" BOX 36" BOX LANDSCAPE PLAN GATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVE A PORTION OF THE S.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, G.&S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA 2203155, 2301138, 2301232 CASE #2301236 I:\PROJECTS\CCD-15\AUTOCAD\WORKING DRAWINGS\CCD-15_LS 2.DWG, 03/07/2024, 11:04 AM, KENDRA POTTERPROJECT: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS/SUBMITTALS DATE# OF CASE NO: REFERENCE: CALL TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG 602-263-1100 1-800-STAKE-IT (OUTSIDE MARICOPA COUNTY) F O R A G E N C Y R E V I E W A N D A P P R O V A L O N L Y . N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N . N O T F O R B I D D I N G THE USE OF PLANS PREPARED BY THE PLANNING CENTER SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE ORIGINAL SITE FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED AND PUBLICATION THEREOF IS LIMITED TO SUCH USE. REPRODUCTION, PUBLICATION OR RE-USE BY ANY METHOD, IN WHOLE OR PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS PROHIBITED. TITLE TO THESE CONCEPTS AND PLANSREMAIN WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WITHOUT PREJUDICE. VISUAL CONTACT WITH THE PLANS SHALL CONSTITUTE PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF THESE RESTRICTIONS. THE DRAWINGS OR CONCEPTS SHALL NOT BE USED IN PART OR IN WHOLE FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT JUST COMPENSATION AND PERMISSION FROM THE PLANNING CENTER.THE PL GCEANNNIN ERT a d i v i i Isooonf nTPCGrup,c. e scr conegtetu osn az 857012600 520.623.6146 520.622.1950 azplanningcenter.comss CCD-15 03/07/24 KDP DB R-9 26 33 DANIEL A. BRADSHAW 58092 E X PIRES 0 6 /3 0 /26KEY MAP HARDSCAPE & GROUNDCOVER HARDSCAPE & GROUNDCOVER Small Rock (3 8" Screened except 1 4" Minus for Dog Park, Bike, & Trail) Right-of-Way Screened Rock Rip-Rap * 25% Coverage Desert Cobble Mix & 100% Cvg. Hydroseed 100% CoverageDesert Cobble Mix Pool Paver A Pool Paver B Vehicular Paver Concrete Sidewalk Synthetic Turf Entry Monument Sign Site Theme Columns LEGEND Project Boundary NORTH 0'25'50'100' SCALE: 1"=50' PROJECT BOUNDARY THIS SHEET UNDISTURBED OPEN SPACE (TO REMAIN) 03/07/24 W W BF JB E C C C CEM U M WBF WBF W BFW BFW BF WBF WBF SD SD SD 29 5 7 2958 295 8 295 9 29562 9 5 5 29 5 4 295 3 2 9 5 2 WBF WBF RECREATION RECREATION OPEN SPACE 219-19-4980 RESIDENTIAL 219-19-182A N N 219-19-1950 N N N MANAG E R 265 MAIL / P A C K A G E 272 GYM 266 MEN 278 WOMEN 277 CLUB 273 LEASIN G 274 HALLW A Y 268 OFFIC E 291 POOL E Q P 292 N N N N N N N N N N N N 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 48" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 36" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 36" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 48" BOX 36" BOX N N 36" BOX 36" BOX LANDSCAPE PLAN GATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVE A PORTION OF THE S.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, G.&S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA 2203155, 2301138, 2301232 CASE #2301236 I:\PROJECTS\CCD-15\AUTOCAD\WORKING DRAWINGS\CCD-15_LS 2.DWG, 03/07/2024, 11:04 AM, KENDRA POTTERPROJECT: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS/SUBMITTALS DATE# OF CASE NO: REFERENCE: CALL TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG 602-263-1100 1-800-STAKE-IT (OUTSIDE MARICOPA COUNTY) F O R A G E N C Y R E V I E W A N D A P P R O V A L O N L Y . N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N . N O T F O R B I D D I N G THE USE OF PLANS PREPARED BY THE PLANNING CENTER SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE ORIGINAL SITE FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED AND PUBLICATION THEREOF IS LIMITED TO SUCH USE. REPRODUCTION, PUBLICATION OR RE-USE BY ANY METHOD, IN WHOLE OR PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS PROHIBITED. TITLE TO THESE CONCEPTS AND PLANSREMAIN WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WITHOUT PREJUDICE. VISUAL CONTACT WITH THE PLANS SHALL CONSTITUTE PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF THESE RESTRICTIONS. THE DRAWINGS OR CONCEPTS SHALL NOT BE USED IN PART OR IN WHOLE FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT JUST COMPENSATION AND PERMISSION FROM THE PLANNING CENTER.THE PL GCEANNNIN ERT a d i v i i Isooonf nTPCGrup,c. e scr conegtetu osn az 857012600 520.623.6146 520.622.1950 azplanningcenter.comss CCD-15 03/07/24 KDP DB R-10 27 33 DANIEL A. BRADSHAW 58092 E X PIRES 0 6 /3 0 /26THIS SHEET KEY MAP WALLS WALL PLAN THEME WALL (5' MASONRY STUCCO VENEER ON ALL SIDES) ACCENT WALL (6' MASONRY STONE VENEER EXTERNAL SIDE FACING STREET/ STUCCO VENEER INTERNAL SIDE) SCREEN WALL (5' SPLIT FACE MASONRY BLOCK) VIEW FENCE (5' VERTICAL TUBE STEEL FENCE) VIEW FENCE (5' WELDED MESH FENCE) LEGEND Project Boundary NORTH 0'25'50'100' SCALE: 1"=50' PROPERTY BOUNDARY 03/07/24 HARDSCAPE DETAILS LANDSCAPE PLAN GATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVE A PORTION OF THE S.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, G.&S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA 2203155, 2301138, 2301232 CASE #2301236 I:\PROJECTS\CCD-15\AUTOCAD\WORKING DRAWINGS\CCD-15_LS 2.DWG, 03/07/2024, 11:04 AM, KENDRA POTTERPROJECT: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS/SUBMITTALS DATE# OF CASE NO: REFERENCE: CALL TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG 602-263-1100 1-800-STAKE-IT (OUTSIDE MARICOPA COUNTY) F O R A G E N C Y R E V I E W A N D A P P R O V A L O N L Y . N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N . N O T F O R B I D D I N G THE USE OF PLANS PREPARED BY THE PLANNING CENTER SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE ORIGINAL SITE FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED AND PUBLICATION THEREOF IS LIMITED TO SUCH USE. REPRODUCTION, PUBLICATION OR RE-USE BY ANY METHOD, IN WHOLE OR PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS PROHIBITED. TITLE TO THESE CONCEPTS AND PLANSREMAIN WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WITHOUT PREJUDICE. VISUAL CONTACT WITH THE PLANS SHALL CONSTITUTE PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF THESE RESTRICTIONS. THE DRAWINGS OR CONCEPTS SHALL NOT BE USED IN PART OR IN WHOLE FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT JUST COMPENSATION AND PERMISSION FROM THE PLANNING CENTER.THE PL GCEANNNIN ERT a d i v i i Isooonf nTPCGrup,c. e scr conegtetu osn az 857012600 520.623.6146 520.622.1950 azplanningcenter.comss CCD-15 03/07/24 KDP DB HD-1 28 33 DANIEL A. BRADSHAW 58092 E X PIRES 0 6 /3 0 /26GROUNDCOVER 2 (LANDSCAPE ROCK, HYDROSEED, OTHER - DIFFERENT BUT ADJACENT TO GROUNDCOVER 1 ) GROUNDCOVER 1 (LANDSCAPE ROCK, HYDROSEED, OTHER) 3-5' TRANSITION ZONE NTS8TRANSITION BETWEEN ADJACENT GROUNDCOVERS NOTES: 1. TO PROVIDE A NATURALISTIC YET COHESIVE TRANSITION BETWEEN TWO GROUNDCOVER APPLICATIONS, CREATE A TRANSITION ZONE OF APROXIMATELY 3-5 FEET ALONG THE EDGE OF ADJACENT GROUNDCOVERS. 2. AS THE GROUNDCOVERS ARE APPLIED, REDUCE THE APPLICATION OF GROUNDCOVER 1, WHILE INCREASING THE GROUNDCOVER 2 APPLICATION WHICH WILL RESULT IN A MIXTURE OF BOTH WITHIN A PORTION OF THE TRANSITION ZONE. 3. INERT GROUNDCOVERS SHOWN ARE FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY. FOR TYPE, METHOD, & DENSITY OF APPLICATION, REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN & ASSOCIATED NOTES. NTS3SCREENED ROCK MULCH 1/2" MIN (1" MAX) 2" ROCK DEPTH (MIN) FINISH GRADE -RAKED SMOOTH PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ROCK MULCH -APPLY PRE-EMERGENT WEED CONTROL OVER SUBGRADE ROUGH GRADE SCREENED ROCK MULCH -RAKED SMOOTH SUBGRADE NTS2RIP RAP MULCH 1/2" MIN (1" MAX) VARIES 2"-4" ROCK DEPTH (MIN) FINISH GRADE -RAKED SMOOTH PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ROCK MULCH -APPLY PRE-EMERGENT WEED CONTROL OVER SUBGRADE ROUGH GRADE RIP RAP ROCK MULCH SUBGRADE NOTES: 1.REFER TO SPECIFICATION FOR ROCK MIX (SIZES), COLOR AND INSTALLATION. 2.TOP OF RIP RAP SHALL SIT MIN. 1 2" BELOW THE TOP (SURFACE) OF ADJACENT SIDEWALK OR CURB. NOTES: 1.REFER TO SPECIFICATION FOR ROCK MIX (SIZES), COLOR AND INSTALLATION. 2.TOP OF ROCK MULCH MIX SHALL SIT MIN. 1 2" BELOW THE TOP (SURFACE) OF ADJACENT SIDEWALK OR CURB. NTS6DESERT COBBLE MULCH NOTES: 1.REFER TO SPECIFICATION FOR ROCK MIX (SIZES), COLOR AND INSTALLATION. 2.TOP OF DESERT COBBLE ROCK MIX SHALL SIT 1 2" BELOW THE TOP (SURFACE) OF ADJACENT SIDEWALK OR CURB. SUBGRADE ROCK MIX (INFORMAL SPREAD, 100% COVERAGE)SIDEWALK / CURB SIDEWALK / CURB VARIES 2"-4" NOTES: 1.REFER TO SPECIFICATION FOR ROCK MIX (SIZES), COLOR AND INSTALLATION. 2.TOP OF DESERT COBBLE ROCK MIX SHALL SIT 1/2" BELOW THE TOP (SURFACE) OF ADJACENT SIDEWALK OR CURB. ROCK SHOULD BE SCATTERED TO PARTIALLY COVER APPROXIMATELY 25% OF SOIL SURFACE. 3.REFER TO SPECIFICATION FOR HYDROSEED MIX. INSTALL PER ORO VALLEY APPROVED REVEGETATION SEED MIX (TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE ADDENDUM (D.) 4.ROCK MULCH SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO SEEDING. SUBGRADE SIDEWALK / CURB NTS7HYDROSEED + DESERT COBBLE COMBO SIDEWALK / CURB VARIES. ROCK SHOULD BE SCATTERED (NATURAL/WILD AESTHETIC) HYDROSEED (100% FULL COVERAGE) ROCK MULCH (25% COVERAGE - SCATTERED) HYDROSEED ROCK MIX (SCATTERED) FINISHED GRADE NTS1INCIDENTAL GRADING 1'-6" MIN.4 1% SLOPE MIN. 2.5" (TOP OF SIDEWALK TO TOP OF GRADE) 1 EXISTING FINISH GRADE TOP OF CURB OR SIDEWALK FINISH GRADE TOP OF CURB OR SIDEWALK 1'-6" MIN. 2.5" (TOP OF SIDEWALK TO TOP OF GRADE) 1% SLOPE MIN. 4 1 NOTES: 1) GRADE EXISTING MATERIAL TO FINISH GRADE 2) TOP OF SCREENED ROCK SHOULD SIT 0.5" BELOW TOP OF ADJACENT CURB, SIDEWALK, OR HARDSCAPE SURFACE. 3) ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE DEPRESSED A MINIMUM OF 4" TO COLLECT RAINWATER WHERE IT FALLS. NEGATIVE SLOPE (AWAY FROM HARDSCAPE) POSITIVE SLOPE (TOWARD HARDSCAPE) TOP OF DECORATIVE ROCK 0.5" (TOP OF SIDEWALK TO TOP OF DECORATIVE ROCK) FINISH GRADE TOP OF DECORATIVE ROCK 0.5" (TOP OF SIDEWALK TO TOP OF DECORATIVE ROCK) SUBGRADE SOIL 5.5" 50D 4GA TURF NAILS (PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION) ADJACENT PAVEMENT 1" 1/4" DECOMPOSED GRANITE 3" AGGREGATE BASE (COMPACT TO 90%) 4 ARTIFICIAL TURF NTS NOTES 1) INSTALL ARTIFICIAL TURF PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. SCALE: NTS5SAFETY SURFACE W/ HEADER DECORATIVE LANDSCAPE ROCK 9"3"6" AGGREGATE BASE, COMPACTED#4 REBAR, CONTINUOUS SUBGRADE, 95% COMPACTED 2'-0" X 6" CONCRETE HEADER WITH 1/4" EXPANSION JOINT EVERY 30' O.C., 1/4" SCORED JOINT EVERY 5' O.C. ENGINEERED WOOD FIBER SAFETY SURFACE,9" DEPTH, ADA ACCESSIBLE. SUBMIT SAMPLE TO OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE FOR APPROVAL. 1/4" RADIUS, TYP. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC 24"2-4"NOTES: 1. WOOD CHIP PAD TO MEASURE 9" THICK AFTER COMPACTION. 2. LAY ATOP LANDSCAPE FABRIC OVER 3" LOOSE PEA GRAVEL. 3. 2-4" COMPACTED SUBGRADE OR ABC. NOTE: SEE SHEET R-2 FOR COLORS & FINISHES. 03/07/24 HARDSCAPE DETAILS LANDSCAPE PLAN GATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVE A PORTION OF THE S.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, G.&S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA 2203155, 2301138, 2301232 CASE #2301236 I:\PROJECTS\CCD-15\AUTOCAD\WORKING DRAWINGS\CCD-15_LS 2.DWG, 03/07/2024, 11:04 AM, KENDRA POTTERPROJECT: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS/SUBMITTALS DATE# OF CASE NO: REFERENCE: CALL TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG 602-263-1100 1-800-STAKE-IT (OUTSIDE MARICOPA COUNTY) F O R A G E N C Y R E V I E W A N D A P P R O V A L O N L Y . N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N . N O T F O R B I D D I N G THE USE OF PLANS PREPARED BY THE PLANNING CENTER SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE ORIGINAL SITE FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED AND PUBLICATION THEREOF IS LIMITED TO SUCH USE. REPRODUCTION, PUBLICATION OR RE-USE BY ANY METHOD, IN WHOLE OR PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS PROHIBITED. TITLE TO THESE CONCEPTS AND PLANSREMAIN WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WITHOUT PREJUDICE. VISUAL CONTACT WITH THE PLANS SHALL CONSTITUTE PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF THESE RESTRICTIONS. THE DRAWINGS OR CONCEPTS SHALL NOT BE USED IN PART OR IN WHOLE FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT JUST COMPENSATION AND PERMISSION FROM THE PLANNING CENTER.THE PL GCEANNNIN ERT a d i v i i Isooonf nTPCGrup,c. e scr conegtetu osn az 857012600 520.623.6146 520.622.1950 azplanningcenter.comss CCD-15 03/07/24 KDP DB HD-2 29 33 DANIEL A. BRADSHAW 58092 E X PIRES 0 6 /3 0 /26PLAN VIEW NOTES: 1) ALL CONCRETE WALKS TO HAVE A MINIMUM CROSS SLOPE OF 1/8" PER FT. AND A MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE OF 1/4" PER FT. 2) CONCRETE THICKNESS AND REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE PER STRUCTURAL ENGINEER'S DESIGN. THICKENED EDGE (MIN. TWICE DEPTH OF PAD) ALONG PERIMETER OF ALL CONCRETE PADS. 3) STANDARD CONCRETE COLOR AND FINISH: NATURAL GREY WITH TROWEL FINISH.. 6'SEE PLANS 60' MAX 60' MAX 1/2" BITUMINOUS JOINT FILLER 1/4" DEEP SCORED JOINTS (TYP.) 1 CONCRETE PAVING DETAIL NTS 3/16" 1/4" R SCORED JOINT 1/2" BITUMINOUS JOINT FILLER CLASS B CONCRETE EXISTING SUBGRADE, 95% COMPACT 4" OF AB, 95% COMPACT 9 RAISED MASONRY PLANTER DETAILS NTS NOTES: 1) STRUCTURAL ENGINEER TO PROVIDE STRUCTURAL DESIGN/CALCS (FOOTING, REBAR, HORIZONTAL REINFORCEMENT, ETC.). 2) FOOTING TO BE 4" (MIN) BELOW TOP OF GRADE. 3) ALL MATERIALS TO BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. ELEVATION 1'-6" MIN. VARIES PER LOCATION OF PLANTER (SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN) CMU WITH STUCCO VENEER. INTEGRAL COLOR: DE6105 WEATHERED LEATHER (TO MATCH ARCHITECTURAL COLOR & FINISH OF TRIM ACCENT) 8 CONCRETE SEAT WALL SECTION NTS 18" CONCRETE SEAT WALL NOTES: 1.CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE: 3,000 PSI, REBAR SHALL BE 3" CLEAR ALL SIDES. 2.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SAMPLE CONCRETE POURED PANEL 36"X24"X6" FOR APPROVAL BY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 3.COMPACT SUBGRADE TO 95%. 4.EXPANSION JOINTS WITH 1/4" BITUMINOUS JOINT FILLER REQUIRED WHERE SEAT WALL IS ADJACENT TO PAVERS/PAVEMENT.18"12"12"30" CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE, INTEGRAL COLOR & FINISH CONCRETE FOOTING, 3,000 PSI. PAVERS/PAVEMENT FINISH GRADE VERTICAL REBAR, #4 1/8" RADIUS, TYP. HORIZONTAL REBAR, #4, 9" O.C. EXPANSION JOINT 95% COMPACT SUBGRADE VERTICAL REBAR, #4, 9" O.C. 7 CONCRETE SEAT WALL ELEVATION-FRONT NTS LENGTH & SHAPE VARIES PER LOCATION, SEE HARDSCAPE PLAN18"FINISH GRADE 1% SLOPE FOR WATER TO DRAIN 10" NTS4SECTION BICYCLE PARKING: SURFACE AND HEADER 6" 3" MINUS CENTER OF BIKE RACK PAD (APPROX 3'-9") BIKE RACK, INGROUND MOUNT, CENTRALLY ALIGN BETWEEN HEADER AND SIDEWALK. CONCRETE HEADER, 6"X10" DECORATIVE ROCK MULCH (LANDSCAPED AREA) 3/8" MINUS (3" DEPTH MIN. ABOVE A.B.) COMPACTED & STABILIZED IN 1" LIFTS. SUBGRADE BELOW MINUS SHALL BE 90% COMPACTED. NOTES 1) STRUCTURAL ENGINEER TO PROVIDE STRUCTURAL DESIGN / CALCS BASED ON SOILS REPORT. 2) ALL PRODUCTS AND MATERIALS TO BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. 3) MATERIAL COLORS AND FINISHES: PER SPECIFICATION ON HARDSCAPE SHEETS 2 CONCRETE PAVER EDGE RESTRAINT SECTION NTS 8"8"3'-9"6" CONCRETE HEADER PAVEMENT OR PAVERS 3/8" MINUS, 2" DEPTH, (COMPACTED & STABILIZED) BICYCLE RACK (CENTRALLY ALIGNED) DECORATIVE ROCK (LANDSCAPED AREA) NTS5PLAN VIEW BICYCLE PARKING: SURFACE AND HEADER NOTE: 1. NUMBER OF BIKE RACKS VARY PER LOCATION. SEE HARDSCAPE PLAN. 2. BICYCLE PARKING AT TRAILHEAD SIZED PER PLAN. CENTER RACKS PER DETAIL HERE. SIZE HEADERS PER DETAIL HERE. 4'-0"3'-6"3'-6"8'-6"11'-0" GEOTEXTILE; AS REQUIRED, WRAP UP FACE OF CURB SUBGRADE (COMPACTED PER SOILS REPORT) AGGREGATE BASE (PER SOILS REPORT) POOL PAVERS JOINT SAND SAND SETTING BED THE LAST COURSE OF PAVERS SHALL BE AFFIXED TO 8X8 CONCRETE FOOTER WITH ADHESIVE MORTAR. (2) #3 REBAR CONTINUOUS THROUGHOUT FOOTER. DECORATIVE LANDSCAPE ROCK SUBGRADE (COMPACTED PER SOILS REPORT) NTS3CONCRETE HEADER / EDGING TOP OF HEADER TO REST 2.5" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. (TOP OF ADJACENT DECORATIVE SCREENED ROCK TO REST 0.5" BELOW TOP EDGING. TOP OF ADJACENT ARTIFICIAL TURF TO REST 0.5" ABOVE EDGING.) NOTES: 1) SCORE HEADER EVERY 36" 2) EXPANSION JOINT EVERY 20' 3) EDGES AT TOP OF EDGING SHALL HAVE 1/4" RADIUS. 4) 3,000 PSI CONCRETE, COLOR: NATURAL STRUCTURAL ENGINEER TO PROVIDE STRUCTURAL DESIGN / CALCS BASED ON SOILS REPORT. 5) ALL PRODUCTS AND MATERIALS TO BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. PAVERS (WIDTH VARIES - SEE PLANS)12"2'-0" HEADER 4"CONCRETE HEADER: LANDSCAPE APPLICATIONS CONCRETE HEADER: PARKING LOT PAVER APPLICATIONS 6" HEADER SUBGRADE (COMPACTED PER SOILS REPORT) COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE #4 BAR (CENTERED AND CONTINOUS) #5 BAR (CENTERED AND CONTINOUS) SUBGRADE (COMPACTED PER SOILS REPORT) 4"x8" ONE-SIDED BULLNOSE EDGE COPING (TO MATCH FIRE PIT) (STEPLOCK | DESERTLOCK COLLECTION BY ARTISTIC PAVERS) COLOR: SAND FINISH: POLISHED & ANTIQUED NOTE: SEE SHEET R-2 FOR COLORS & FINISHES. COMPACTED DB TO 95% MIN. COLOR & SIZE TO BE DETERMINED BY CONTRACTOR FINISHED GRADE 2" BELOW TOP OF PATH, IF RAKED EARTH, 2" BELOW 1" RADIUS TYP. IF AREA ADJACENT TO PATH IS DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION, HYDROSEED WITH 25% APPLICATION OF DESERT COBBLE IN A WIDTH OF 4FT. BOTH SIDES OF PATH 6 FT. COMPACTED SUBGRADE TO 95% MIN. 2" 6 PERMEABLE TRAIL CONNECTION - COMPACTED 3/8" MINUS NTS 1% GRADED SLOPE 03/07/24 HARDSCAPE DETAILS LANDSCAPE PLAN GATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVE A PORTION OF THE S.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, G.&S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA 2203155, 2301138, 2301232 CASE #2301236 I:\PROJECTS\CCD-15\AUTOCAD\WORKING DRAWINGS\CCD-15_LS 2.DWG, 03/07/2024, 11:04 AM, KENDRA POTTERPROJECT: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS/SUBMITTALS DATE# OF CASE NO: REFERENCE: CALL TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG 602-263-1100 1-800-STAKE-IT (OUTSIDE MARICOPA COUNTY) F O R A G E N C Y R E V I E W A N D A P P R O V A L O N L Y . N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N . N O T F O R B I D D I N G THE USE OF PLANS PREPARED BY THE PLANNING CENTER SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE ORIGINAL SITE FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED AND PUBLICATION THEREOF IS LIMITED TO SUCH USE. REPRODUCTION, PUBLICATION OR RE-USE BY ANY METHOD, IN WHOLE OR PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS PROHIBITED. TITLE TO THESE CONCEPTS AND PLANSREMAIN WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WITHOUT PREJUDICE. VISUAL CONTACT WITH THE PLANS SHALL CONSTITUTE PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF THESE RESTRICTIONS. THE DRAWINGS OR CONCEPTS SHALL NOT BE USED IN PART OR IN WHOLE FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT JUST COMPENSATION AND PERMISSION FROM THE PLANNING CENTER.THE PL GCEANNNIN ERT a d i v i i Isooonf nTPCGrup,c. e scr conegtetu osn az 857012600 520.623.6146 520.622.1950 azplanningcenter.comss CCD-15 03/07/24 KDP DB HD-3 30 33 DANIEL A. BRADSHAW 58092 E X PIRES 0 6 /3 0 /263 MONUMENT SIGN SCALE: NTS 1234 4 THEME COLUMN ELEVATION SCALE: NTS CMU WITH STONE VENEER FASCIA C.I.P. CONCRETE W/ STONE VENEER FASCIA 0.5" X 2" TUBULAR STEEL/ ALUMINUM BARS MOUNTED TO STEEL BASE WITHIN FOUNDATION OF MONUMENT BASE PLACED IN PATTERN AS SHOWN IN PLAN VIEW SO BARS ARE ANGLED NOT PERPENDICULAR TO BASE. ELEVATION PLAN VIEW PLACED ANGLED SIMILAR TO PATTERN SHOWN BELOW SO BARS ARE EVENLY SPACED YET NOT PERPENDICULAR TO BASE. CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE WITH STONE VENEER FASCIA 0.5" X 2" TUBULAR STEEL/ ALUMINUM BARS MOUNTED TO STEEL BASE STEEL BASE MOUNTED INTO MONUMENT BASE WITH REBAR NOTE: 1.SIGN TO BE METAL BOX INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED WITH ILLUMINATED PUSH THROUGH ACRYLIC LETTERING. 2.MATERIAL COLOR: DARK METAL WITH LIGHT COLORED LETTERING (TO BE DETERMINED BY OWNER.) 3.DESIGN TO BE PROVIDED BY SIGN CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS. 4.SIGN PERMIT TO BE ACQUIRED SEPARATELY BY CONTRACTOR FROM THE TOWN FOR CONSTRUCTION. NOTE: COLOR & FINISH REQUIRE TOWN APPROVAL. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS. NTS1NATURAL GAS FIRE PIT NTS2ELEVATION OUTDOOR KITCHEN COUNTER/GRILL BUILT-IN 36" PROPANE GAS GRILL (COYOTE C-SERIES C2C36LP OR APPROVED EQUAL) COUNTERTOP BY CORIAN (SOLID SURFACE, 3/4" THICKNESS WITH 1.5" EASED APRON, COLOR TBD) GFCI OUTLET INSTALLED WITHIN MASONRY ON ONE SIDE. STAINLESS STEEL VENTS INSTALLED WITHIN MASONRY ON TWO SIDES. NOTES: 1) CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS. 2) GAS (PROPANE) AND ELECTRICITY TO BE DESIGNED AND PERMITTED BY OTHERS. 3) MATERIALS TO BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS. 4) ISLAND DIMENSIONS SHALL BE: 120" WIDE, 30" DEEP, AND 3' HIGH. FLEXIBLE BBQ LIGHT BY FOCUS INDUSTRIES (BQ-FD02 SERIES, DECK MOUNT, 120 V)3'3/4"3'-3/4"10' GATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVE INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED BOX SIGN FINISHED GRADE STUCCO FINISH TO MATCH PLANTERS & WALLS ACCESS PANEL AT BACK OF ISLAND (COYOTE 26" DOUBLE DOOR CDA2426 OR APPROVED EQUAL) 16"1'3'1'7' 12'4"2"1'1' 4' 12' 6" 7' 1'4' 6' 2" 2"2"4'6' BOX SIGN 3" BOX SUPPORTED WITH STEEL TUBES. ATTACH SIGN TO STEEL TUBES. 2" 1/2" BB' A A' DECORATIVE PAVEMENT DRAIN RAINWATER TO ADJACENT LANDSCAPE AREA. 12" x 96" LINEAR FIRE PIT BURNER KIT. ATTACH PLATE TO CMU BLOCK WALLS PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. REINFORCEMENT PER STRUCTURAL ENGINEER ELECTRONIC SPARK IGNITION KIT WITH TIMER & EMERGENCY SHUTOFF. CMU FIRE PIT - 6" wide x 8" high x 16" long BLOCKS BURNER INSERT BURNER PLATE VENT (TWO SIDES) ELEVATION A-A'ELEVATION B-B' NOTES: 1) CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS. 2) GAS AND ELECTRICITY TO BE DESIGNED AND PERMITTED BY OTHERS. 3) RECTANGULAR BURNER KIT WITH TRAY, IGNITION, TIMER, AND SHUTOFF PER OWNER. 4) FIRE GLASS (2"-3") SET ON TRAY TO COVER BURNER. COLOR PER OWNER. 5) MATERIALS TO BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS. 6) BLOCK AND CAP PATTERN TO BE SYMMETRICAL. SHORTENED BLOCK AND CAP (CUT TO SIZE) SHALL BE PLACED IN MIDDLE OF WALL AND NOT AT EDGES. LOW VOLTAGE LED WALL LIGHT (BY FXLUMINARE) TO BE PLACED UNDER WALL CAP ON ALL SIDES. PRODUCT: LF-W-FB STUCCO FINISH (TO MATCH WALLS & PLANTERS) - FINISH: SAND FINISH - INTEGRAL COLOR: DE6105 WEATHERED LEATHER) ONE-SIDED STRAIGHT RELAXED-EDGE COPING (STEPLOCK | DESERTLOCK COLLECTION BY ARTISTIC PAVERS) - INTEGRAL COLOR: SAND - FINISH: POLISHED & ANTIQUED - TO MATCH POOL COPING SIZE: 12" WIDTH 9'-0" TO EDGE OF VENEER (6" WIDE MASONRY BLOCK W/ STUCCO VENEER.) 9'-8" EDGE TO EDGE OF COPING PLAN VIEW TOP SURFACE 5"5"VENTS PER MFR. SPECIFICATIONS (MFR. LISTED SHEET R-2) ELECTRONIC SPARK IGNITION KIT WITH TIMER & EMERGENCY SHUTOFF. 8'-0" LINEAR FIREPIT OPENING 1'-4"2'-8"-0" EDGE OF CAP 2'-0" EDGE OF MASONRY CHANNEL PIN MOUNTED NUMBERS WITH REVERSE HALO BACKLIT ILLUMINATION VENTS PER MFR. SPECIFICATIONS (MFR. LISTED SHEET R-2) 1' OPENING FOR LINEAR FIRE PIT BURNER 8" ONE-SIDED BULLNOSE COPING TO MATCH POOL 6" CMU 8'-0" LINEAR FIREPIT OPENING 6"-0" CMU 2-3" FIRE GLASS NOTE: SEE SHEET R-2 FOR COLORS & FINISHES. STONE PAVER CAP (SEE SHEET R-2 MATERIAL SPECS.) FONTS/LOGO TO BE DETERMINED BY OWNER AT TIME OF CONTRACTOR DESIGN/INSTALLATION. 03/07/24 NOTE: SEE SHEET R-2 FOR COLORS & FINISHES. SEE SHEET HD-5 FOR WALL SECTION ELEVATIONS. HARDSCAPE DETAILS LANDSCAPE PLAN GATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVE A PORTION OF THE S.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, G.&S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA 2203155, 2301138, 2301232 CASE #2301236 I:\PROJECTS\CCD-15\AUTOCAD\WORKING DRAWINGS\CCD-15_LS 2.DWG, 03/07/2024, 11:04 AM, KENDRA POTTERPROJECT: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS/SUBMITTALS DATE# OF CASE NO: REFERENCE: CALL TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG 602-263-1100 1-800-STAKE-IT (OUTSIDE MARICOPA COUNTY) F O R A G E N C Y R E V I E W A N D A P P R O V A L O N L Y . N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N . N O T F O R B I D D I N G THE USE OF PLANS PREPARED BY THE PLANNING CENTER SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE ORIGINAL SITE FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED AND PUBLICATION THEREOF IS LIMITED TO SUCH USE. REPRODUCTION, PUBLICATION OR RE-USE BY ANY METHOD, IN WHOLE OR PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS PROHIBITED. TITLE TO THESE CONCEPTS AND PLANSREMAIN WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WITHOUT PREJUDICE. VISUAL CONTACT WITH THE PLANS SHALL CONSTITUTE PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF THESE RESTRICTIONS. THE DRAWINGS OR CONCEPTS SHALL NOT BE USED IN PART OR IN WHOLE FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT JUST COMPENSATION AND PERMISSION FROM THE PLANNING CENTER.THE PL GCEANNNIN ERT a d i v i i Isooonf nTPCGrup,c. e scr conegtetu osn az 857012600 520.623.6146 520.622.1950 azplanningcenter.comss CCD-15 03/07/24 KDP DB HD-4 31 33 DANIEL A. BRADSHAW 58092 E X PIRES 0 6 /3 0 /26CMU WITH STUCCO VENEER CMU WITH STONE VENEER FINISHED GRADE FINISHED GRADE 100'6'5'6'20' 20' 20' 100'100' CMU WITH STONE VENEER 100' 1-2" STRAIGHT EDGE CAPSTONE ON TOP & SIDES 1-2" STRAIGHT EDGE CAPSTONE ON TOP & SIDES CMU WITH STUCCO VENEER1-2" STRAIGHT EDGE CAPSTONE ON TOP & SIDES 2'15' 2'-6"2'-6" NOTES: 1. BUFFERYARD SCREEN WALL SHALL BE A SERIES OF 20' LONG STONE VENEER SECTIONS & STUCCO SECTIONS OF VARYING LENGTHS OF MAX. 100 FT OFFSET 2' FROM EACH OTHER FOR WILDLIFE MOVEMENT.( SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN LS-1 & LS-2 FOR PLACEMENT & DETAILS THIS SHEET) 2. THEME WALLS SECTIONS SHALL BE SPACED 15' APART. 3. ACCENT WALL SECTIONS SHALL BE CENTERED WITHIN THE 15' OPENINGS. ENDS OF WALLS WILL OVERLAP 2.5' ON EACH SIDE. 15' NTS3ELEVATION ACCENT WALL NTS4ELEVATION ENTRY & STREET ALTERNATING THEME & ACCENT WALLS PLAN VIEW ELEVATION 8"8"8"FINISHED GRADE SPLIT FACE SURFACE CMU BLOCK SCREEN WALL: 5' HIGH(SEE WALL PLAN)NTS1ELEVATION BUILDING/VEHICLE SCREEN WALL 2 THEME WALL ELEVATION SCALE: NTS CMU WITH STUCCO VENEER (TO MATCH RAISED PLANTER) NOTE: 1. COLOR AND FINISH REQUIRE TOWN APPROVAL. 2. STRUCTURAL ENGINEER TO PROVIDE STRUCTURAL DESIGN/CALCS (FOOTING, REBAR, HORIZONTAL REINFORCEMENT, ETC.). 3. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS. 4. STUCCO TO WRAP AROUND ALL SIDES OF CMU WALL. 5. TOP TO SLOPE 1% TO PROVIDE DRAINAGE. DIMENSIONS VARY: MATCH SIZE TO WALLS SHOWN IN HARDSCAPE PLANS FINISH GRADE5'DIMENSIONS VARY: MATCH SIZE TO WALLS SHOWN IN HARDSCAPE PLANS CMU WITH STUCCO VENEER CMU WITH STUCCO VENEER A' A A' A A' A UNIFORM BLOCK CAP NOTE: SEE SHEET R-2 FOR COLORS & FINISHES 03/07/24 HARDSCAPE DETAILS LANDSCAPE PLAN GATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVE A PORTION OF THE S.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, G.&S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA 2203155, 2301138, 2301232 CASE #2301236 I:\PROJECTS\CCD-15\AUTOCAD\WORKING DRAWINGS\CCD-15_LS 2.DWG, 03/07/2024, 11:04 AM, KENDRA POTTERPROJECT: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS/SUBMITTALS DATE# OF CASE NO: REFERENCE: CALL TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG 602-263-1100 1-800-STAKE-IT (OUTSIDE MARICOPA COUNTY) F O R A G E N C Y R E V I E W A N D A P P R O V A L O N L Y . N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N . N O T F O R B I D D I N G THE USE OF PLANS PREPARED BY THE PLANNING CENTER SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE ORIGINAL SITE FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED AND PUBLICATION THEREOF IS LIMITED TO SUCH USE. REPRODUCTION, PUBLICATION OR RE-USE BY ANY METHOD, IN WHOLE OR PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS PROHIBITED. TITLE TO THESE CONCEPTS AND PLANSREMAIN WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WITHOUT PREJUDICE. VISUAL CONTACT WITH THE PLANS SHALL CONSTITUTE PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF THESE RESTRICTIONS. THE DRAWINGS OR CONCEPTS SHALL NOT BE USED IN PART OR IN WHOLE FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT JUST COMPENSATION AND PERMISSION FROM THE PLANNING CENTER.THE PL GCEANNNIN ERT a d i v i i Isooonf nTPCGrup,c. e scr conegtetu osn az 857012600 520.623.6146 520.622.1950 azplanningcenter.comss CCD-15 03/07/24 KDP DB HD-5 32 33 DANIEL A. BRADSHAW 58092 E X PIRES 0 6 /3 0 /26I:\PROJECTS\CCD-15\AUTOCAD\WORKING DRAWINGS\CCD-15_LS 2.DWG, 08/31/2023, 2:31 PM, KENDRA POTTERPROJECT: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS/SUBMITTALS DATE# OF CASE NO: REFERENCE: CALL TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG 602-263-1100 1-800-STAKE-IT (OUTSIDE MARICOPA COUNTY) F O R A G E N C Y R E V I E W A N D A P P R O V A L O N L Y . N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N . N O T F O R B I D D I N G THE USE OF PLANS PREPARED BY THE PLANNING CENTER SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE ORIGINAL SITE FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED AND PUBLICATION THEREOF IS LIMITED TO SUCH USE. REPRODUCTION, PUBLICATION OR RE-USE BY ANY METHOD, IN WHOLE OR PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS PROHIBITED. TITLE TO THESE CONCEPTS AND PLANSREMAIN WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WITHOUT PREJUDICE. VISUAL CONTACT WITH THE PLANS SHALL CONSTITUTE PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF THESE RESTRICTIONS. THE DRAWINGS OR CONCEPTS SHALL NOT BE USED IN PART OR IN WHOLE FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT JUST COMPENSATION AND PERMISSION FROM THE PLANNING CENTER.CCD-15 DB THE PL GCEANNNIN ERT a d i v i i Isooonf nTPCGrup,c. e scr conegtetu osn az 857012600 520.623.6146 520.622.1950 azplanningcenter.comss SCREEN WALL BUILDINGS 6" CMU THEME WALL 6" CMU ACCENT WALL 6" CMU 8" CAP 10" CAP 5'2"5' MIN.6'2" 6" MIN. SECTION A-A' WALL SECTION A-A' WALL SECTION A-A' WALL S*S*NOTES: 1) S* = PROVIDED BY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER.S*S*S*NOTES: 1) S* = PROVIDED BY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER.S*S* NOTES: 1) S* = PROVIDED BY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER.S*S*FINISHED GRADE 8" HIGH CMU W/ #4 @ 48" O.C. VERTICAL IN GROUTED CELLS. JOINT REINFORCING AT 16" O.C. STONE PAVER CAP (SLOPE TO DRAIN) STONE VENEER (EXTERNAL/ FRONT SIDE) COLOR AND TEXTURE TO MATCH ARCHITECTURE (SELECTED BY OWNER). CONCRETE FOOTING REBAR REINFORMENT PER STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. ALTERNATE BENDS OF VERTICAL REBAR, PER STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. HORIZONTAL WELDED WIRE REINFORCEMENT AT JOINT PER STRUCTRUAL ENGINEER. (TYP) CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR FOOTING. 8" HIGH CMU W/ #4 @ 48" O.C. VERTICAL IN GROUTED CELLS. JOINT REINFORCING AT 16" O.C. STUCCO VENEER ALL SIDES & TOP OF WALL PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECS. COLOR AND TEXTURE TO MATCH ARCHITECTURE. CONCRETE FOOTING REBAR REINFORMENT PER STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. ALTERNATE BENDS OF VERTICAL REBAR, PER STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. HORIZONTAL WELDED WIRE REINFORCEMENT AT JOINT PER STRUCTRUAL ENGINEER. (TYP) CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR FOOTING. 8" HIGH CMU W/ #4 @ 48" O.C. VERTICAL IN GROUTED CELLS. JOINT REINFORCING AT 16" O.C. UNIFORM MASONRY CAP (SLOPE TO DRAIN) CONCRETE FOOTING REBAR REINFORMENT PER STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. ALTERNATE BENDS OF VERTICAL REBAR, PER STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. HORIZONTAL WELDED WIRE REINFORCEMENT AT JOINT PER STRUCTRUAL ENGINEER. (TYP) CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR FOOTING. SPLIT FACE MASONRY BLOCK FRONT AND BACK FINISHED GRADEFINISHED GRADE STUCCO VENEER INTERNAL (BACK SIDE) PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECS. COLOR AND TEXTURE TO MATCH ARCHITECTURE. NTS1ELEVATION SCREEN WALL NTS2ELEVATION THEME WALL NTS3ELEVATION ACCENT WALL TOP SLOPE TO DRAIN NOTE: STRUCTURAL ENGINEER SHALL PROVIDE THE REQUIRED PERMIT, DETAILS, & CALCULATIONS OF STRUCTURAL PLAN ELEMENTS. 03/07/24 HARDSCAPE DETAILS LANDSCAPE PLAN GATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVE A PORTION OF THE S.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, G.&S.R.M., TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA 2203155, 2301138, 2301232 CASE #2301236 I:\PROJECTS\CCD-15\AUTOCAD\WORKING DRAWINGS\CCD-15_LS 2.DWG, 03/07/2024, 11:04 AM, KENDRA POTTERPROJECT: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS/SUBMITTALS DATE# OF CASE NO: REFERENCE: CALL TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG 602-263-1100 1-800-STAKE-IT (OUTSIDE MARICOPA COUNTY) F O R A G E N C Y R E V I E W A N D A P P R O V A L O N L Y . N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N . N O T F O R B I D D I N G THE USE OF PLANS PREPARED BY THE PLANNING CENTER SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE ORIGINAL SITE FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED AND PUBLICATION THEREOF IS LIMITED TO SUCH USE. REPRODUCTION, PUBLICATION OR RE-USE BY ANY METHOD, IN WHOLE OR PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS PROHIBITED. TITLE TO THESE CONCEPTS AND PLANSREMAIN WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WITHOUT PREJUDICE. VISUAL CONTACT WITH THE PLANS SHALL CONSTITUTE PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF THESE RESTRICTIONS. THE DRAWINGS OR CONCEPTS SHALL NOT BE USED IN PART OR IN WHOLE FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT JUST COMPENSATION AND PERMISSION FROM THE PLANNING CENTER.THE PL GCEANNNIN ERT a d i v i i Isooonf nTPCGrup,c. e scr conegtetu osn az 857012600 520.623.6146 520.622.1950 azplanningcenter.comss CCD-15 03/07/24 KDP DB HD-6 33 33 DANIEL A. BRADSHAW 58092 E X PIRES 0 6 /3 0 /2620' SQUARE (SEE HARDSCAPE PLAN)10'TUBULAR STEELFRAME 4 PERGOLA (POOL AMENITY AREA) NTSNTS3PLAN VIEW PERGOLA (POOL AMENITY AREA) NOTES: 1) ELEVATION DIMENSIONS IN THIS DETAIL ARE FOR PERGOLA LOCATED IN POOL AMENITY AREA. 2) CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS. 2) MATERIAL COLORS AND FINISHES: TO MATCH ARCHITECTURE RAILING & DOORS (DE6385 BLACK BEAN LRV7) 3) MATERIALS TO BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. SHADE PROVIDED BY SLATS SPACED EVENLY ACROSS TOP OF PERGOLA FRAME FINISHED GRADE NTS1ELEVATION POOL VIEW FENCE NOTES: 1) CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS. FENCE RAIL AND CONCRETE FOOTING TO BE HIDDEN BELOW GRADE. 2) STRUCTURAL ENGINEER TO PROVIDE STRUCTURAL DESIGN/CALCS (FOOTING, REINFORCEMENT, ETC.). 3) ALL WELDS TO BE CONTINUOUS. 4) VIEW FENCE TO BE ELECTROSTATICALLY PAINTED WITH TWO COMPONENT ACRYLIC URETHANE ENAMEL. 5) MATERIAL COLORS AND FINISHES: DE6385 BLACK BEAN LVR7 (TO MATCH ARCHITECTURAL RAILING & DOORS) 6) MATERIALS TO BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS. VERTICAL TUBE STEEL PICKETS -SIZE: 1"x2" RECTANGLE SHORT SIDE FACING OUT - COLOR: DE 6385 BLACK BEAN LVR 7 5'FINISHED GRADE 2" (4" MAX) BETWEEN PICKETS NOTES: 1) GATE SHALL INCLUDE PANIC HARDWARE. 2) GATE SHALL BE SELF CLOSING AND SELF LATCHING. 3) GATE SHALL BE ELECTROSTATICALLY PAINTED WITH TWO COMPONENT ACRYLIC URETHANE ENAMEL. 4) PAINT COLOR: DE6385 BLACK BEAN LRV 7 (TO MATCH ARCHITECTURAL RAILING & DOORS) 5) ALL WELDS SHALL BE CONTINUOUS. 6) CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS. 7) NO OPENINGS (LARGER THAN 1/2") SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN 24" (TOP AND BOTTOM) OF THE PANIC BAR. 8) GATES SHALL OPEN OUTWARD (AWAY FROM POOL). DOORS SHALL VARY SWING (RIGHT HAND REVERSE OR LEFT HAND REVERSE PER PLAN) ACCORDING TO PLAN ON SHEETS LS-2 & R-6 48" POOL GATE 2"2"3"3" 2"2" 2"2" 2"5'-8"4"5'-4"6'-0"1'PULLHANDLE3'-0"BOTTOM OFHANDLE TOGRADE2" TUBE STEEL FRAME 3" TUBE STEEL POST (MIN) 2" TUBE STEEL FRAME WELDED WIRE MESH INTERIOR OPENINGS SHALL NOT EXCEED 1/2" ELECTROMAGNETIC GATE LOCK WITH FOB/SMART TECHNOLOGY ACTIVATION GATE HANDLE (GATE TO OPEN OUTWARD FROM POOL) PLUMB GATE POST FOR POWER SUPPLY SELF CLOSING SPRING LOADED SAFETY GATE HINGES (TYP) PANIC HARDWARE, PER IBC (INTERIOR SIDE OF GATE) STEEL PANEL TO MATCH FRAME & POSTS (TO MATCH VIEW FENCE) NTS2ELEVATION POOL GATE 18" MIN. MESH PANEL 18" MIN. MESH PANEL 5'-0"FINISHED GRADE 1" x 2" RECTANGLE PICKETS TO MATCH VIEW FENCE GATE RESIDES AT SOUTHWEST CORNER OF POOL VIEW FENCE (SEE LS PLANS) 3"19'6" 6"20'1" 6" 5'-6" 3" 20' 5'-6"19.34'4"x6" BEAMS TUBULAR STEEL CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS 2"x6" JOISTS TUBULAR STEEL CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS 6"x6" SQUARE POSTS TUBULAR STEEL CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS 1" x 2" RECTANGLE NOTES: 1) ELEVATION DIMENSIONS IN THIS DETAIL ARE FOR PERGOLA LOCATED IN POOL AMENITY AREA. 2) CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS. 2) MATERIAL COLORS AND FINISHES: TO MATCH ARCHITECTURE RAILING & DOORS (DE6385 BLACK BEAN LRV7) 3) MATERIALS TO BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. 2" 2" (4" MAX.) 2" 1" 1" 1"3" 1'-6" 2" 3"1" 2" PLAN VIEW GATE 18" SIDE PANEL SIDE ELEVATION FINISH GRADE SIDE PANEL BAR WELDED WIRE MESH PANEL VERTICAL TUBE STEEL PICKETS TUBE STEEL GATE POST (GATE FRAME ATTACHES HERE) VERTICAL TUBE STEEL PICKETS NOTE: SEE SHEET R-2 FOR COLORS & FINISHES 03/07/24 WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: Traci L. Riccitello, Esq. Riccitello Law Firm, PLLC 3849 E. Broadway Blvd., Suite 239 Tucson, Arizona 85716 ______________________________________________________________________________ AMENDMENT TO EASEMENT AGREEMENT This Amendment to Easement Agreement (“Amendment”) is made this ___ day of _____________, 2024 (“Effective Date”), by and between the Town of Oro Valley, an Arizona municipal corporation (“Town”), and OV 132, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company (“OV 132”). By its signature below, Archaeology Southwest, an Arizona nonprofit corporation (“Archaeology Southwest”) (successor-in-interest to The Conservation Fund, a nonprofit corporation incorporated in Maryland as a nonstock corporation (“TCF”)), has acknowledged its consent to this Amendment. Recitals A. The Town and OV 132 entered into that certain Easement Agreement, which was recorded on July 19, 2022, in the Pima County Recorder’s Office at Sequence No. 20222000702 (“Easement Agreement”). TCF (predecessor-in-interest to Archaeology Southwest) signed the Easement Agreement, acknowledging its consent thereto. Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment have the meaning given to such terms in the Easement Agreement. B. In the Easement Agreement, the Town granted OV 132 an easement “for any use related to retention, drainage, parking, open space/passive recreation, or utilities in connection with the development of 132 two-story apartment units on the OV 132 Property, and for landscaping, and other reasonable site zoning relief necessary to construct up to 132 two-story apartment units on the OV 132 Property” over the “Easement Area.” C. The Easement Agreement acknowledges that when it was entered into, development plans for the OV 132 Property were in their early stages and the precise area and location, and exact nature of the use of the Easement Area had not yet been established. As a result, the Easement Agreement expressly contemplated that the parties would execute and record an amendment to the Easement Agreement after development plans for the OV 132 Property were finalized to show the size, location, and uses of the Easement Area. D. The development plans for the OV 132 Property have now been finalized and approved by the Town. Consequently, OV 132 and the Town desire to execute and record this Amendment for purpose of more precisely identifying the legal description and nature of the use of the Easement Area. Archaeology Southwest desires to evidence its consent to this Amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth herein, OV 132, and the Town, hereby agree as follows: 1. Recitals. The recitals set forth above are deemed incorporated herein, and the parties represent they are true and correct. 2. Easement Area. The Easement Area is hereby defined to mean that certain 1.891 acres of real property depicted on Exhibit A attached hereto and legally described on Exhibit B attached hereto. All references to the Easement Area in the Easement Agreement shall mean the Easement Area as defined in this Amendment. More particularly, the 1.36 acres of real property depicted on Exhibit A attached hereto and identified as “Total Paved/Impervious Area” shall be defined herein as the “Improved Area” and the 0.531 acres of real property depicted on Exhibit A attached hereto and identified as “Total Drainage Basin Area” shall be defined herein as the “Natural Drainage Area.” 3. Grant of Easement. Paragraph 3 of the Easement Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: The Town hereby grants and conveys to OV 132 and its successors and assigns, for the benefit of the OV 132 Property, a perpetual easement over the Improved Area for any use related to parking, including covered parking structures, and over the Natural Drainage Area for any use related to retention, drainage and open space, both in connection with the development of 132 two- story apartment units on the OV 132 Property (the “Easement”). The Easement shall be appurtenant to and for the benefit of the OV 132 Property and it shall constitute a burden upon the Town Property. The easement, rights, covenants and conditions contained herein shall run with the land, and shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto, and their successors and assigns. OV 132 acknowledges that the Easement Area shall be developed and improved in accordance with the development plan and landscape plan approved by the Town for Case No. 2301236. 4. General Provisions. 4.1 Conflict. If there is any conflict between the Easement Agreement and this Amendment, this Amendment will control. If there is any conflict between the Easement Agreement (as amended hereby) and the Conservation Easement with respect to the use of Easement Area, the Easement Agreement (as amended hereby) will control. 4.2 No Other Changes. Except as modified herein, all terms and conditions of the Easement Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. From and after the Effective Date, any and all references to the “Easement” in the Easement Agreement shall mean the Easement as modified by this Amendment. 4.3 Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts and each such counterpart shall be deemed to be an original. The parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the day and year first above written. TOWN TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, an Arizona municipal corporation By: ____________________, Town Manager Approved as to form: Tobin Sidles, Legal Services Director Attest: ____________________, Town Clerk STATE OF ARIZONA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF PIMA ) On _______________, 2024 before me, _______________, Notary Public, personally appeared _______________, personally known to me to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. Witness my hand and official seal. Notary Public My commission expires: OV 132 OV 132, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company By: Ross Rulney, Manager STATE OF ARIZONA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF PIMA ) On _______________, 2024 before me, _______________, Notary Public, personally appeared _______________, personally known to me to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. This document was signed and notarized online using two-way audio and video recording technology. Witness my hand and official seal. Notary Public My commission expires: CONSENT Archaeology Southwest consents to the execution of this Amendment by the Town and OV 132 and acknowledges that this Amendment is permitted under Section 2.5 of the Conservation Easement. ARCHAEOLOGY SOUTHWEST Archaeology Southwest, an Arizona non-profit corporation By: Name: Title: STATE OF ARIZONA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF PIMA ) On _______________, 2024 before me, _______________, Notary Public, personally appeared _______________, personally known to me to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. This document was signed and notarized online using two-way audio and video recording technology. Witness my hand and official seal. Notary Public My commission expires: EXHIBIT A Depiction of Easement Area EXHIBIT B Legal Description of Easement Area [To match Exhibit A and provided after approval] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a.23 studios • 711 E. 9th Street Tucson, AZ 85719 • p. 520.245.4010 • e.burak@a23studios.com • Page 1 of 1 The Gateway at Vistoso Preserve Design Narrative The site currently acts as a trailhead for the meandering paths connecting the neighborhood. This gateway function will continue to ensure access to this neighborhood amenity, integrating the apartment complex into the neighborhood character. Buildings interspersed with native vegetation to integrate into the nature of the site. This layout allows for views through and out into the desert taking advantage of the spectacular vistas. The project is a multifamily development consisting of 2 story residential buildings and a 1 story amenity building. This is consistent with the 1 and 2 story adjacent developments. The buildings are broken into 2 and 4 unit groupings with open breezeways between to facilitate a natural meandering though the site as is consistent with the current trailhead use of the project. The buildings have a consistent architectural design on all 4 sides and the trash enclosures are of a similar construction type and design to ensure a cohesive project. The roofs are sloped clay tile with a central roof well to screen the roof access and roof top mechanical units. The buildings are designed with stucco walls and accents and sloped roofs with wood eave detailing and wood shade structures. This design was informed by the existing neighborhood context and with the input of the Vistoso Community Association Architecture Landscape Review Committee. There are 4 building types which all work with the same library of elements including stack stone veneer, single hung windows with a stucco lintel detail, earth tone stucco walls and sloped clay tile roofs. The buildings consist of 16, 20 and 24 unit configurations with a single amenity building. The design has been divided into groups of 2-4 units separated by offset circulation elements to divide up the mass and allow for relief across the façade length of the building. This articulation at the building entry includes a recessed vertical circulation mass that has a wooden shade structure providing pedestrian shade and visually drawing into the building. The low patio walls are clad in stack stone veneer to provide a human scale feature at the base of the building. The patio roofs are offset below the main sloped roof to vary the roof planes. The building facades at each unit include large windows with a pronounced stucco header. This same header feature is included at the vertical circulation mass but without glass, just a recessed openings. The color and materials of the development were selected from the approved Vistoso Community Association Color Pallets. The design color selection is a warm tan stucco base color with two accent paint colors, a darker brown and a cooler tan color. All paint colors are earth tones and pick up on naturally occurring colors on the site. In addition to painted stucco the project includes stained wood details and stack stone veneer as well as clay tile roofs. Each residential building has a central roof well, this drops the roof top condensing units in behind the sloped roofs, screening them from view. Sincerely, A23 Studios Burak Bekat, AIA, Principal a.23 STUDIOS || 711 E 9TH ST., TUCSON, AZ 85719 | A23 #22039 THE GATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVE This exhibit is an artist rendering intended to represent the architectural style and overall scale of the project. Material and color may vary based on light, shadow and visual representation. Final colors, sizes and locations of architectural features may be modified according to local codes and/or other landlord considerations. 12 OF 14 VIEW FROM CLUBHOUSE a.23 STUDIOS || 711 E 9TH ST., TUCSON, AZ 85719 | A23 #22039 THE GATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVE This exhibit is an artist rendering intended to represent the architectural style and overall scale of the project. Material and color may vary based on light, shadow and visual representation. Final colors, sizes and locations of architectural features may be modified according to local codes and/or other landlord considerations. 13 OF 14 VIEW FROM SHARED PARKING a.23 STUDIOS || 711 E 9TH ST., TUCSON, AZ 85719 | A23 #22039 THE GATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVE This exhibit is an artist rendering intended to represent the architectural style and overall scale of the project. Material and color may vary based on light, shadow and visual representation. Final colors, sizes and locations of architectural features may be modified according to local codes and/or other landlord considerations. 11 OF 11 ROOF TOP SCREENING CLARIFICATION BIRD’S EYE RENDERING SHOWING ROOF TOP UNITSTYPICAL BUILDING B SECTION TYPICAL BUILDING B ROOF PLAN PARAPET WALL BEYOND CONDENSING UNITCONDENSING UNIT 2ND FLOOR UNIT B2-R HALL HALL1ST FLOOR UNIT B2-R 2ND FLOOR UNIT B2 1ST FLOOR UNIT B2 a.23 STUDIOS || 711 E 9TH ST., TUCSON, AZ 85719 | A23 #22039 THE GATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVE This exhibit is an artist rendering intended to represent the architectural style and overall scale of the project. Material and color may vary based on light, shadow and visual representation. Final colors, sizes and locations of architectural features may be modified according to local codes and/or other landlord considerations. 5 OF 14 TYPICAL BUILDING | COLORED SCHEMES DISPLAYED IN SCHEME 1 (RV COLOR PALLETE 10) DISPLAYED IN SCHEME 2 (RV COLOR PALLETE 3) DISPLAYED IN SCHEME 3 (RV COLOR PALLETE 7) CT-1ST-1 SV-1 WD-1 WD-1 WD-1ST-3 ST-1ST-4 WT-1 ST-2 CT-1ST-1 SV-1 WD-1 WD-1 WD-1ST-3 ST-1ST-4 WT-1 ST-2 CT-1ST-1 SV-1 WD-1 WD-1 WD-1ST-3 ST-1ST-4 WT-1 ST-2 a.23 STUDIOS || 711 E 9TH ST., TUCSON, AZ 85719 | A23 #22039 THE GATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVE This exhibit is an artist rendering intended to represent the architectural style and overall scale of the project. Material and color may vary based on light, shadow and visual representation. Final colors, sizes and locations of architectural features may be modified according to local codes and/or other landlord considerations. 7 OF 1411' - 7"LVL 1 LVL 2 T.O. RIDGE 30' - 10"4' - 4"2' - 0"11' - 1"CT-1ST-1 SV-1 WD-1 WD-1 WD-1ST-3 ST-1ST-4 WT-1 ST-2 CONDENSING UNIT, CONCEALEDROOF WELL 11' - 7"30' - 10"LVL 1 LVL 2 T.O. RIDGE CT-1 ST-3 ST-2 SV-1WD-1 ST-4ST-1WT-1 CONDENSING UNIT, CONCEALED ROOF WELL 11' - 7"LVL 1 LVL 2 T.O. RIDGE 30' - 10"4' - 4"2' - 0"11' - 1"CT-1ST-1 SV-1 WD-1 WD-1 WD-1ST-3 ST-1ST-4 WT-1 ST-2 CONDENSING UNIT, CONCEALEDROOF WELL 11' - 7"30' - 10"LVL 1 LVL 2 T.O. RIDGE CT-1 ST-3 ST-2 SV-1WD-1 ST-4ST-1WT-1 CONDENSING UNIT, CONCEALED ROOF WELL TYPICAL BUILDING | COLORED ELEVATIONS 1 | NORTH ELEVATION 2 | WEST ELEVATION DISPLAYED IN SCHEME 1 (RV COLOR PALLETE 10) a.23 STUDIOS || 711 E 9TH ST., TUCSON, AZ 85719 | A23 #22039 THE GATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVE This exhibit is an artist rendering intended to represent the architectural style and overall scale of the project. Material and color may vary based on light, shadow and visual representation. Final colors, sizes and locations of architectural features may be modified according to local codes and/or other landlord considerations. 8 OF 1411' - 7"30' - 10"LVL 1 LVL 2 T.O. RIDGE WD-1 WD-1 WD-1ST-1ST-1 ST-3 ST-4SV-1ST-2WT-1 CT-1 CONDENSING UNIT, CONCEALEDROOF WELL 11' - 7"30' - 10"LVL 1 LVL 2 T.O. RIDGE CT-1ST-2 ST-3WT-1 ST-1ST-4SV-1 WD-1 CONDENSING UNIT, CONCEALEDROOF WELL 11' - 7"30' - 10"LVL 1 LVL 2 T.O. RIDGE WD-1 WD-1 WD-1ST-1ST-1 ST-3 ST-4SV-1ST-2WT-1 CT-1 CONDENSING UNIT, CONCEALEDROOF WELL 11' - 7"30' - 10"LVL 1 LVL 2 T.O. RIDGE CT-1ST-2 ST-3WT-1 ST-1ST-4SV-1 WD-1 CONDENSING UNIT, CONCEALEDROOF WELL TYPICAL BUILDING | COLORED ELEVATIONS 3 | SOUTH ELEVATION 4 | EAST ELEVATION DISPLAYED IN SCHEME 1 (RV COLOR PALLETE 10) a.23 STUDIOS || 711 E 9TH ST., TUCSON, AZ 85719 | A23 #22039 THE GATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVE This exhibit is an artist rendering intended to represent the architectural style and overall scale of the project. Material and color may vary based on light, shadow and visual representation. Final colors, sizes and locations of architectural features may be modified according to local codes and/or other landlord considerations. 10 OF 14 OPEN MAIL POOL EQ OOO ST-1 CT-1 WD-1ST-3 ST-2 SV-1 10' - 0"2' - 0"24' - 3"OPEN OO OO MAIL/POOL EQ LEASING CLUBHOUSE GYM ST-1ST-2ST-3 CT-1SV-1WD-1 WT-1 OPEN GYM CLUBHOUSE LEASING MAIL/POOL EQ OOOO CT-1 WT-1 ST-1 ST-2 ST-3SV-1 WD-1 GYM ST-1 ST-2 CT-1 SV-1WT-1 OPEN MAIL POOL EQ OOO ST-1 CT-1 WD-1ST-3 ST-2 SV-1 10' - 0"2' - 0"24' - 3"OPEN OO OO MAIL/POOL EQ LEASING CLUBHOUSE GYM ST-1ST-2ST-3 CT-1SV-1WD-1 WT-1 OPEN GYM CLUBHOUSE LEASING MAIL/POOL EQ OOOO CT-1 WT-1 ST-1 ST-2 ST-3SV-1 WD-1 GYM ST-1 ST-2 CT-1 SV-1WT-1 OPEN MAIL POOL EQ OOO ST-1 CT-1 WD-1ST-3 ST-2 SV-1 10' - 0"2' - 0"24' - 3"OPEN OO OO MAIL/POOL EQ LEASING CLUBHOUSE GYM ST-1ST-2ST-3 CT-1SV-1WD-1 WT-1 OPEN GYM CLUBHOUSE LEASING MAIL/POOL EQ OOOO CT-1 WT-1 ST-1 ST-2 ST-3SV-1 WD-1 GYM ST-1 ST-2 CT-1 SV-1WT-1 OPEN MAIL POOL EQ OOO ST-1CT-1 WD-1ST-3 ST-2 SV-1 10' - 0"2' - 0"24' - 3"OPEN OO OO MAIL/POOL EQ LEASING CLUBHOUSE GYM ST-1ST-2ST-3 CT-1SV-1WD-1 WT-1 OPEN GYMCLUBHOUSE LEASING MAIL/POOL EQ OOOO CT-1WT-1ST-1 ST-2 ST-3SV-1 WD-1 GYM ST-1 ST-2 CT-1 SV-1WT-1 CLUBHOUSE | COLORED ELEVATIONS 5 | NORTHWEST ELEVATION 7 | SOUTHWEST ELEVATION 6 | NORTHEAST ELEVATION 8 | SOUTHEAST ELEVATION DISPLAYED IN SCHEME 1 (RV COLOR PALLETE 10) a.23 STUDIOS || 711 E 9TH ST., TUCSON, AZ 85719 | A23 #22039 THE GATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVE This exhibit is an artist rendering intended to represent the architectural style and overall scale of the project. Material and color may vary based on light, shadow and visual representation. Final colors, sizes and locations of architectural features may be modified according to local codes and/or other landlord considerations. 11 OF 14 ADJ. TRASH ENCLOSURE MAINTENANCE 3' - 0"13' - 4"6' - 0"ADJ. TRASH ENCLOSURE ST-2 ST-2 ST-1WT-1 SV-1 ADJ. TRASH ENCLOSURE ST-2 ST-2ST-1 WT-1 SV-1 ST-1 ST-2 CT-1 SV-1 ST-1 ST-2 CT-1 GATE TO MATCH BRONZE TRIM ADJ. TRASH ENCLOSURE MAINTENANCE 3' - 0"13' - 4"6' - 0"ADJ. TRASH ENCLOSURE ST-2 ST-2 ST-1WT-1 SV-1 ADJ. TRASH ENCLOSURE ST-2 ST-2ST-1 WT-1 SV-1 ST-1 ST-2 CT-1 SV-1 ST-1 ST-2 CT-1 GATE TO MATCH BRONZE TRIM MAINTENANCE | PLAN + COLORED ELEVATIONS 10 | NORTHWEST ELEVATION 9 | MAINTENANCE FLOOR PLAN 12 | SOUTHWEST ELEVATION 11 | NORTHEAST ELEVATION 13 | SOUTHEAST ELEVATION 12 10 13 11 KEY PLAN DISPLAYED IN SCHEME 1 (RV COLOR PALLETE 10) a.23 STUDIOS || 711 E 9TH ST., TUCSON, AZ 85719 | A23 #22039 THE GATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVE This exhibit is an artist rendering intended to represent the architectural style and overall scale of the project. Material and color may vary based on light, shadow and visual representation. Final colors, sizes and locations of architectural features may be modified according to local codes and/or other landlord considerations. 3 OF 10 MATERIALS BOARD MATERIAL: SMOOTH STUCCOCOLOR: DE6103 COPPER LAKE ELEMENT: BUILDING FIELDLRV: 31 MATERIAL: SMOOTH STUCCOCOLOR: DEC718 MESA TAN ELEMENT: TRIM ACCENTLRV: 27 MATERIAL: SMOOTH STUCCOCOLOR: DE6105 WEATHERED LEATHERELEMENT: TRIM ACCENTLRV: 27 MATERIAL: WOODSTAIN: SW3518 HAWTHORNE ELEMENT: TRIM AND FRAMING MATERIAL: STONE VENEERSTAIN: CLIFFSTONE-MESQUITEELEMENT: PATIO + TOWER WALLS MATERIAL: PAINTCOLOR: DE6385 BLACK BEANELEMENT: RAILING AND DOORSLRV: 7 MATERIAL: WINDOWFINISH: BRONZE CAPELEMENT: WINDOW TRIM MATERIAL: CLAY TILECOLOR: 3646 SUNSET BLENDELEMENT: ROOF a.23 STUDIOS || 711 E 9TH ST., TUCSON, AZ 85719 | A23 #22039 THE GATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVE This exhibit is an artist rendering intended to represent the architectural style and overall scale of the project. Material and color may vary based on light, shadow and visual representation. Final colors, sizes and locations of architectural features may be modified according to local codes and/or other landlord considerations. 2 OF 12 SITE PLAN a.23 STUDIOS || 711 E 9TH ST., TUCSON, AZ 85719 | A23 #22039 THE GATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVE This exhibit is an artist rendering intended to represent the architectural style and overall scale of the project. Material and color may vary based on light, shadow and visual representation. Final colors, sizes and locations of architectural features may be modified according to local codes and/or other landlord considerations. 4 OF 12 TYPICAL BUILDING | FLOOR PLAN 3 1 4 2 KEY PLAN B2-R A2 A2-R A2 B2 B1 A1 A1-R A1 B1 a.23 STUDIOS || 711 E 9TH ST., TUCSON, AZ 85719 | A23 #22039 THE GATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVE This exhibit is an artist rendering intended to represent the architectural style and overall scale of the project. Material and color may vary based on light, shadow and visual representation. Final colors, sizes and locations of architectural features may be modified according to local codes and/or other landlord considerations. 7 OF 12 CLUBHOUSE | FLOOR PLAN 7 6 8 5 KEY PLAN MANAGER 302 MAIL / PACKAGE 301 GYM 311 WOMEN RR 307 MEN RR 306 CLUB 305 LEASING 303HALLWAY 310 OFFICE 304 UNISEX RR 309 UNISEX RR 308 a.23 STUDIOS || 711 E 9TH ST., TUCSON, AZ 85719 | A23 #22039 THE GATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVE This exhibit is an artist rendering intended to represent the architectural style and overall scale of the project. Material and color may vary based on light, shadow and visual representation. Final colors, sizes and locations of architectural features may be modified according to local codes and/or other landlord considerations. 11 OF 12 IMAGE OF ADJACENT PROPERTY 755 W VISTOSO HIGHLANDS DR - COURTESY OF GOOGLE a.23 STUDIOS || 711 E 9TH ST., TUCSON, AZ 85719 | A23 #22039 THE GATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVE This exhibit is an artist rendering intended to represent the architectural style and overall scale of the project. Material and color may vary based on light, shadow and visual representation. Final colors, sizes and locations of architectural features may be modified according to local codes and/or other landlord considerations. 12 OF 12 IMAGE OF ADJACENT PROPERTY 695 W VISTOSO HIGHLANDS DR - COURTESY OF GOOGLE WWBFCCUMMMANAGER265MAIL / PACKAGE272GYM266MEN278WOMEN277CLUB273LEASING274HALLWAY268OFFICE291POOL EQP292CLUBHOUSEPOOL AREASITE PLAN CONCEPTTHE GATEWAY AT VISTOSO PRESERVETHEPLGCEANNNINERTadiviiIsooonfnTPCGrup,c.ssccchuhrtetuosnaz857011106320NORTHPROJECT:DATE:CCD-153/7/2024FILE NAME:RUL-05_TDP.DWG0'50'SCALE: 1"=100'100'VISTOSO HIGHLANDS DRIVENEW TRAIL SEGMENTEXISTING TRAILEXISTING TRAIL257EXISTING 100-YEARFLOODPLAIN LIMITREMOVE TRAIL CONNECTIONBUILDINGTYPE D6BUILDINGTYPE E7BUILDINGTYPE C4BUILDINGTYPE D5BUILDINGTYPE F1BUILDINGTYPE D3BUILDINGTYPE C2NEW CURB CUTEXISTING CURB CUT (TOBE REMOVED)NEW CURB CUTDRAINAGEBASINBOW CRE E K SPRINGS P L A C E HIG H L A N D S W A S H OPEN SPACESTEPROCKCANYON PLACE30'SCALE: 2" = 1 MILENORTHRancho Vistoso Blvd.Fairways Dr.DesertHighlandsVistosoDr.OVERALL PROJECTLOCATION MAPCTRL PTN W2 SE4 2.94 AC SEC 23-11-13CTRL PTN SE4 6.07 AC SEC 23-11-13 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONATENANT PARKING LOT (132 SPACES)TENANT PARKING LOT (125 SPACES)EXISTING TRAIL15' LANDSCAPE BUFFERRANCHO VISTOSONEIGHBORHOODOPEN SPACERANCHOVISTOSONEIGHBORHOODHIGH DENSITYRESIDENTIALRANCHOVISTOSONEIGHBORHOODMEDIUM DENSITYRESIDENTIALHIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIALOPENSPACERANCHOVISTOSONEIGHBORHOODHIGH DENSITYRESIDENTIALMAINTENANCE FACILITYMoore Rd.DRAINAGEBASINEXISTING 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN LIMITTHIS PROJECTVISTOSO TRAILSNATURE PRESERVERECREATIONREZONING PROPERTYUNNAMED WASHFORMER CLUBHOUSE PARCEL(NOT A PART OF REZONING)NOTESPARCEL | ZONE | EXISTING ZONING | PROPOSED ZONING | AREAREZONING PROPERTYAPN 219191840 | RANCHO VISTOSO PAD | OPEN SPACE | GOLF/REC | 0.69 ACFORMER CLUBHOUSE PARCEL (NOT A PART OF REZONING)APN 219191910 | RANCHO VISTOSO PAD | HDR | HDR | 6.07 ACEXPANSION AREA | 1.89 AC (NOT A PART OF REZONING)GRADING LIMITS | 1.12 AC (NOT A PART OF REZONING)OVERALL PROJECT NOTESTOTAL PROJECT AREA: 6.76 ACPROPOSE USE: TWO-STORY GARDEN STYLE WALK-UP APARTMENTSTOTAL NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL APARTMENT BUILDINGS: 7 - BUILDING TYPE C: 2 (TWO STORIES, 8 UNITS PER FLOOR, 16 UNITS PER BLDG) - BUILDING TYPE D: 3 (TWO STORIES, 10 UNITS PER FLOOR, 20 UNITS PER BLDG) - BUILDING TYPE E: 1 (TWO STORIES, 12 UNITS PER FLOOR, 24 UNITS PER BLDG) - BUILDING TYPE F: 1 (TWO STORIES, 8 UNITS PER FLOOR, 16 UNITS PER BLDG)TOTAL NUMBER OF UNITS: 132 UNITS - 1 BED UNIT: 76 (58%) - 2 BED UNIT: 56 (42%)TOTAL RAC: 19.52 (132 units / 6.76 acres = 19.52)BUILDING HEIGHT: TWO STORIES (30.83 FT) | MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: 34 FTBUILDING SETBACKS: FRONT: 20 FT | SIDE: 5 FT | REAR: 5 FTOPEN SPACE: REQUIRED: 30% (2.02 AC) | PROVIDED: 36% (2.49 AC)RECREATION SPACE: REQUIRED: 250 SF PER UNIT = 33,000 SF | PROVIDED: 34,038 SF - CLUBHOUSE, FITNESS CENTER, POOL AREA: 11,687 SF - DOG PARK: 4,038 SF - EVENT LAWN & TOT LOT: 6,072 SF - PEDESTRIAN PROMENADE: 10,176 SF - TRAIL HEAD: 2,065 SFPARKINGREQUIRED PARKING: 245 SPACES- 1.5 SPACES PER EA 1 BED UNIT = 114 SPACES- 1.75 SPACE PER EA 2 BED UNIT = 98 SPACES- 1 GUEST SPACE PER EVERY 4 UNITS = 33 SPACESPROVIDED PARKING: 257 SPACESEXPANSION AREA(NOT A PART OF REZONING)APPROXIMATE GRADING LIMITSPEDESTRIAN PROMENADENEW TRAILCONNECTIONNEW TRAIL CONNECTIONREMOVE TRAIL CONNECTIONSCREEN WALLSCREEN WALLSCREEN WALLSCREEN WALLA CB DOG PARKEVENT LAWN & TOT LOTPRIVATE TRAIL HEAD FORMULTIFAMILY RESIDENTS(BUFFER A - COLLECTOR)25'30'30'NATURAL TRAILCONNECTION Questions (see recording posted on OVprojects.com for responses) Comments or concerns 1s t Neig h borho od Meeting Vi st os o Hi g hl an ds Propo sed r ezo ni ng To w n Hall May 15, 2023 6:00-7:30 pm Drainage / Environment Traffic / Parking Introductions and Welc ome Meeting facilitator Michael Spaeth, Principal Planner with the Town, introduced the agenda for the meeting and public participation process. Approximately ## residents and interested parties attended in person. Town Presentati on Michael Spaetth provided a presentation that included: -Location of the property -History and background of the property -Rezoning request -Review criteria Applicant Presentation Linda Morales, with the Planning Center and representing the private property owner, provided a presentation that inlcuded: -History -Rezoning request -Proposed site plan Ques tions and co m m ents A list of questions and comments are provided below. The applicant's and/or staff responses to the questions and comments are available in the meeting recording on OVprojects.com Conclus tion and Next Steps: The applicant?s representative, Linda Morales, provided more detail and answered questions related to the proposal. Town staff answered questions about the Town?s process and requirements. Mr. Spaeth closed the meeting, thanked everyone for their attendance and encouraged participants to contact him with any additional comments, questions, or concerns and visit OVprojects.com for updated project information and opportunities to stay involved. It was determined a second neighborhood meeting will be scheduled after a formal submittal. The next opportunity for public input will be at a second neighborhood meeting that will be scheduled for a future date. Compatibility Was there a traffic study done? Will the property be age-restricted? How will the wash/riparian area be accommodated? Why can't the pool and clubhouse be located on original parcel? What about disturbance of the riparian area? Is the unit count negotiable? Is there going to be a manager onsite? What will the leases be like? Short term allowed? Long or short term rentals? How many apt. complexes are in and around Vistoso Highlands? What type of renters are we trying to attract? What is the going market rate for these types of apartments? Why do you need a rezoning now? (after agreement was made) Who owns the land that is proposed for rezoning? Does the Town have any obligation to preserve surrounding home values? When will the developer break ground? How long will construction take? Are the cart paths being moved? Is south parking lot placed on a legal easement Mr. Rulney owns? Alternate location of easement being used also? Should the request be approved, no access from the trail head to the apartments? Is the amount of people factored into the pool size? How large is the pool? Were there public meetings about the 132 units? What is the size of the 1 & 2 bedroom units? What is the target price for the 1 & 2 bedroom units? Are there requirements that some units be low-income housing? Will traffic study be done in November? Or the summer? Who decided 132 units was allowed? Other Wash / riparian area cannot be rezoned Location of wash on Pima Maps is incorrect Proposal looks fine from water / environment perspective Wildlife protection measures needed Walk through apartments to access trails / preserve Road is used for Stone Canyon - still under construction Traffic issues from Stone Canyon has been an ongoing compliant/ problem No access to trail head parking for apartments - move parking further west People coming from all over to visit conservation area - not enough parking spaces Increase in traffic along a two-lane residential street Number of parking spaces per unit - enough? Work with Stone Canyon on their construction traffic route Safety, extensive traffic, noise concerns Left-hand turns into the development - widening? turn lanes? Vistoso Highlands proposed as a 2nd entrance to Stone Canyon? Speed of cars is a concern Blind turns and school buses using the street Reduce size of parking lot No in or out past Hidden Springs - bus turnarounds Construction traffic lines up on street to enter Stone Canyon Existing traffic issues with Stone Canyon - consider cyclists, school children, etc. Concern with the amount of spaces for trail head Condition of Vistoso Highlands Dr. Traffic cutting through neighborhoods to get to Moore Turn-around for traffic - including school buses Trail head parking is not exclusive to trail users Not compatible with the neighborhood Area to the north is also HDR yet developed with single-family homes Proposal is out of character with the community Apartments found on major thoroughfares not within residential communities Impact to views facing west Does not fit area - regardless of zoning 1987 approval was before multi-million $ homes were built in Stone Canyon Highest density north of Tangerine in OV Smallest development in comparison to casitas but more people Amount of land per unit in comparison with nearby condos Proposal is out of character of area Use does not fit in with area Noise pollution and traffic safety is already an issue - plan to mitigate with this development? Logic of rezoning with current surroundings - not compatible Compatibility with surrounding homes Not for the development Told it would be an extension of the casitas Need housing for teachers and people working at the hospital Noise pollution from pool Disrespect to those that participated in preserve Agreement caps units to 132 Against rezoning open space for swimming pool Sets bad precedent to allow rezoning of open space for clubhouse Dr ai n ag e/ En v i r o n m en t Tr af f i c / Par k i n g Co m p at i b i l i t y Ot h er 2n d Nei g h b o r h o o d Meet i n g - 66 at t en d ees i n -p er s o n an d 65 o n l i n e Qu es t i o n s (see recording posted on OVprojects.com for responses) Compromises / Design Changes Proposed trail head parking, has been removed Sight visibility concerns along Vistoso Highlands Road Stakeholder representation Define egress between development and preserve Increase in traffic generated by more residents Existing stop sign near the entrance of the golf course, helps to control traffic Impacts of outdoor ambient lighting 2n d Nei g h b o r h o o d Meet i n g Vi s t o s o Hi g h l an d s Pr o p o s ed Rezo n i n g To w n Hal l J an u ar y 11, 2024 6:00-7:30 p m Construction Traffic for project and Stone Canyon Has consideration been given to limiting storage on patios for residents? What is the zoning of the casitas just east of the site? What will the setback be from the sidewalk? The development agreement allows the project to use 1.5 acres of the conservation easement. How much is the project proposing to use? Has a formal traffic study been completed for the project? Reduce use of conservation easement Conservation agreement does not allow for covered parking Will the site have a boarder wall? Will the grade of the parking area match the existing grade on the site? Why is the project increasing the number of homes per acre, compared to the density at the condos? Are the 132 units a set number for the projects? Regarding parking in the nature preserve area, will that be at grade? What is the setback for the buildings along Vistoso Highlands Road? What is the rezoning fee associated with the sliver in blue section? Rancho Vistoso Highland Road is well maintained, will the developer or contractor be responsible for any damages? Can the Town guarantee market-rate apartments will remain? Will stop signs into the site be required? Was the Town aware of plans for the apartments? What other permitted land uses are allowed? Can the Town purchase the property? The apartments are designed to be a high-end product, why will the site not be gated? Will the proposed parking lots be exclusively for tenants? From beginning to end, how long will the project take to complete? Can you provide the target rental fees? Has an environmental study been submitted? Does it address ambient light? What assurances are in place if ownership and property management changes? Can the project plans change from rentals to condos? Can the Town offer an in-kind exchange for the property? How will the site address bus turnarounds? Has parking for the trail head been identified? Use of native plants along the preserve Compatibility of High Density Resident (HDR) with Single-Family Residential (SFR) Assurances for high-quality property Consistency site wall with existing wall along Rancho Vistoso 1 Written Protest by Property Owners Rezoning Case #2203155 (Vistoso Highlands former clubhouse site) Dear Mr. Mayor and Town Council Members: Pursuant to Oro Valley Code, subsection 22.3.L, I hereby protest in writing against the proposed zoning amendment and ask that my letter be included in the official Town record. I am writing as a property owner directly affected by the General Plan Amendment, rezoning and development plan for the proposed construction of 132 apartments located on approximately 6.76 acres along Vistoso Highlands Drive. The rezoning would allow construction of a parking lot, pool and clubhouse on land currently zoned Open Space adjacent to the proposed apartment project. I strongly object to the rezoning of the Open Space parcel and the entire apartment plan based on the following: 1)Vistoso Highlands Drive cannot support additional vehicle congestion. According to the traffic impact statement from the developer, the proposed apartments would increase daily traffic by more than 50% on our local street that dead-ends at the Stone Canyon gate. That would substantially impact quality of life for the surrounding residents. Traffic hazards on Vistoso Highlands Drive have been a long-standing issue, of which the Town has been aware for over ten years and has done nothing to mitigate. Commercial vehicles routinely block fire hydrants, public/private entrances, and intersections on our local street, in violation of Arizona law. 2)Incompatibility with surrounding neighborhoods and lack of public input. During the May 2023 Neighborhood Meeting, the developer and Town planners “reminded” us that the location of the proposed apartments was zoned high density residential in 1987. No one mentioned that the parcel was re-zoned as General Commercial Use when the Vistoso golf course clubhouse was developed. No one mentioned that in January 2022, the parcel was again re-zoned back to High Density Residential - without neighborhood meetings or public hearings - to allow apartments. The Town’s culture has historically erred on the side of public input. Now, the message from the Town planners is clear: "We’re doing this because we can". That is completely inconsistent with Oro Valley’s General Plan: “Your Voice, Our Future.” Bottom line: the parcel has never been used for apartments. In fact, no apartments exist in similar single-family residential communities anywhere in the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development. 3) Environmental impact does not support transition to Nature Preserve. Maintaining existing Open Space by not disturbing a Protected Riparian Area (PRA) is a better “transition” to the nature preserve than a parking lot, an apartment clubhouse, and a pool. Joseph Bell 704 W Bright Canyon Dr Oro Valley AZ 85755 Signature: ________________________Date: _____________________ 7/12/2023 Written Protest by Property Owners Rezoning Case #2203155 (Vistoso Highlands former clubhouse site) Dear Mr. Mayor and Town Council Members: Pursuant to Oro Valley Code, subsection 22.3.L, I hereby protest in writing against the proposed zoning amendment and ask that my letter be included in the official Town record. I am writing as a property owner directly affected by the General Plan Amendment, rezoning and development plan for the proposed construction of 132 apartments located on approximately 6.76 acres along Vistoso Highlands Drive. The rezoning would allow construction of a parking lot, pool and clubhouse on land currently zoned Open Space adjacent to the proposed apartment project. I strongly object to the rezoning of the Open Space parcel and the entire apartment plan based on the following: 1)Vistoso Highlands Drive cannot support additional vehicle congestion. According to the traffic impact statement from the developer, the proposed apartments would increase daily traffic by more than 50% on our local street that dead-ends at the Stone Canyon gate. That would substantially impact quality of life for the surrounding residents. Traffic hazards on Vistoso Highlands Drive have been a long-standing issue, of which the Town has been aware for over ten years and done nothing to mitigate. Commercial vehicles routinely block fire hydrants, public/private entrances, and intersections on our local street, in violation of Arizona law. 2)Incompatibility with surrounding neighborhoods and lack of public input. During the May 2023 Neighborhood Meeting, the developer and Town planners “reminded” us that the location of the proposed apartments was zoned high density residential in 1987. No one mentioned that the parcel was re-zoned as General Commercial Use when the Vistoso Golf clubhouse was developed. No one mentioned that in January 2022, the parcel was again re-zoned back to High Density Residential - without neighborhood meetings or public hearings - to allow apartments. The Town’s culture has historically erred on the side of public input. Now, the message from the Town planners is clear: "We’re doing this because we can". That is completely inconsistent with Oro Valley’s General Plan: “Your Voice, Our Future.” Bottom line: the parcel has never been used for apartments. In fact, no apartments exist in similar single-family residential communities anywhere in the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development. 3) Environmental impact does not support the developer's idea of a "transition to Nature Preserve". Maintaining existing Open Space by not disturbing a Protected Riparian Area (PRA) is a better “transition” to the nature preserve than a parking lot, an apartment clubhouse, and a pool. Name: Address: Kenneth McKinley________________________________ 13869 N Steprock Canyon PL, Oro Valley, AZ 85755_ _______________________________________________ _ Signature: _____________________________________ Date: _________17 July 2023_____ Written Protest by Property Owners Rezoning Case #2203155 (Vistoso Highlands former clubhouse site) Dear Mr. Mayor and Town Council Members: Pursuant to Oro Valley Code, subsection 22.3.L, I hereby protest in writing against the proposed zoning amendment and ask that my letter be included in the official Town record. I am writing as a property owner directly affected by the General Plan Amendment, rezoning and development plan for the proposed construction of 132 apartments located on approximately 6.76 acres along Vistoso Highlands Drive. The rezoning would allow construction of a parking lot, pool and clubhouse on land currently zoned Open Space adjacent to the proposed apartment project. I strongly object to the rezoning of the Open Space parcel and the entire apartment plan based on the following: 1) Vistoso Highlands Drive cannot support additional vehicle congestion. According to the traffic impact statement from the developer, the proposed apartments would increase daily traffic by more than 50% on our local street that dead-ends at the Stone Canyon gate. That would substantially impact quality of life for the surrounding residents. Traffic hazards on Vistoso Highlands Drive have been a long-standing issue, of which the Town has been aware for over ten years and done nothing to mitigate. Commercial vehicles routinely block fire hydrants, public/private entrances, and intersections on our local street, in violation of Arizona law. 2) Incompatibility with surrounding neighborhoods and lack of public input. During the May 2023 Neighborhood Meeting, the developer and Town planners “reminded” us that the location of the proposed apartments was zoned high density residential in 1987. No one mentioned that the parcel was re-zoned as General Commercial Use when the Vistoso Golf clubhouse was developed. No one mentioned that in January 2022, the parcel was again re-zoned back to High Density Residential - without neighborhood meetings or public hearings - to allow apartments. The Town’s culture has historically erred on the side of public input. Now, the message from the Town planners is clear: "We’re doing this because we can". That is completely inconsistent with Oro Valley’s General Plan: “Your Voice, Our Future.” Bottom line: the parcel has never been used for apartments. In fact, no apartments exist in similar single-family residential communities anywhere in the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development. 3) Environmental impact does not support the developer's idea of a "transition to Nature Preserve". Maintaining existing Open Space by not disturbing a Protected Riparian Area (PRA) is a better “transition” to the nature preserve than a parking lot, an apartment clubhouse, and a pool. Name: ________________________________________________ Address: ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ Signature: _____________________________________ Date: _____________________ 7/13/2023 Brad & Robin Michelson Oro Valley, AZ 85755 13934 N. Steprock Canyon Place Planning & Zoning Commission AGENDA ITEM: 3. Meeting Date:02/06/2024 Requested by:Bayer Vella, Community and Economic Development Case Number:2301138 SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THREE ITEMS RELATED TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF 132 MULTIFAMILY UNITS ON AN APPROXIMATELY 8.7-ACRE SITE LOCATED ON VISTOSO HIGHLANDS DRIVE, APPROXIMATELY 1/4-MILE WEST OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD (ON THE OLD CLUBHOUSE SITE). THE APPLICATIONS INCLUDE: ITEM A: REZONING APPROXIMATELY 0.7 ACRES (PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT) FROM OPEN SPACE TO RECREATION /GOLF COURSE AND TO RELOCATE A PLANNED TRAIL TO ADJACENT TOWN PROPERTY ITEM B: DEVELOPMENT AND LANDSCAPE PLANS ITEM C: ARCHITECTURE RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends conditional approval of Item A, subject to the conditions listed in Attachment 1 - Item A, conditional approval of Item B, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1 - Item B, and approval of Item C. The recommendations for Item B and C are dependent on the recommendation for Item A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The purpose of this item is to consider three applications related to the proposed development of 132 multifamily units on an approximately 8.7-acre site located south of Vistoso Highlands Drive, approximately 1/4-mile west of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard (the former Golf Club at Vistoso clubhouse site) shown in yellow in graphic at right. The applications include: Item A: Rezoning of approximately 0.7 acres (PAD Amendment) from Open Space to Recreation/Golf Course and to relocate a planned trail to adjacent Town property (Attachment 2) Item B: Development and Landscape Plans (Attachment 3 and 4) Item C: Architecture (Attachment 5) A majority of the site was zoned High Density Residential (HDR) in 1987 when Rancho Vistoso was first planned. The HDR zoning district permits apartments in excess of the density and building heights proposed. The subject properties were part of the Settlement Agreement (the "Agreement") that formed the Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve in 2022 between the Town, the original property owner (Romspen), The Conservation Fund, and the current property owner (Oro Valley 132, LLC). The Agreement reflected the existing zoning, established in 1987. It DID NOT create the ability to build apartments as a permitted use. Additional detail is provided in the "Background or Detailed Information" section of this report. APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL The applicant's site design (shown at right) includes: 132 multifamily units Max building height: 32 feet/2 stories (code allows 34 feet/3 stories) 2 access points Recreational amenities Clubhouse facility Pool Dog park Tot-lot area Trail connections to Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve Relocate a planned trail onto adjacent Town property (shown in orange) ITEM A - REZONING (ATTACHMENT 2) Item A is a proposed rezoning for ONLY the western 0.69-acre parcel (shown in blue in graphic above). The request includes two elements: 1. Changing the zoning from Open Space to Recreation/Golf Course to enable development of parking, refuse, and recreation facilities associated with the applicant's development, which are permitted in the Recreation/Golf Course zoning district. No apartment buildings are proposed within the rezoning boundary. 2. Relocate a planned trail onto the adjacent Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve property. Part of the "Agreement" was a verbal commitment from the applicant to construct a trailhead for the adjacent Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve. A condition has been included in Attachment 1 to require development of this public amenity that will be open to all users of the Preserve. The Agreement permitted use of "approximately 1.5 acres" of Preserve land for parking and drainage facilities associated with the development. The applicant's current design proposes approximately 1.9 acres of land within the Preserve, exceeding the amount stipulated in the Agreement. A condition has been included in Attachment 1 - Item B to revise the site plan to limit the area to 1.5 acres. GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE All rezoning applications are reviewed for conformance with the General Plan Land Use Map, Vision, Guiding Principles, and Goals and Policies. The subject property is designated as Open Space on the General Plan Land Use Map. Both the existing zoning (Open Space) and the proposed zoning (Recreation/Golf Course) are consistent with the Open Space designation as shown in the Land Use Designations and Zoning table on page 49 of the Your Voice, Our Future General Plan. The applicant's proposal is to develop only parking, refuse, and recreation facilities within the rezoning area, no apartments, to accommodate the adjacent, entitled multifamily proposal. The applicant's proposal is in conformance with the Your Voice, Our Future General Plan. Additional detail regarding the request's conformance is provided in the "Background and Detailed Information" section of this report. ZONING CODE CONFORMANCE Planned Area Development (PAD) Amendment (rezoning) requests are also reviewed for conformance with the applicable PAD (in this case the Rancho Vistoso PAD), specifically the development standards of the proposed zoning district, and any applicable standards of the Town of Oro Valley Zoning Code. The applicant is requesting a rezoning of the property from Rancho Vistoso Open Space to Rancho Vistoso Recreation/Golf Course, the same district as the adjacent Preserve. The Tentative Development Plan (Attachment 6 and shown above) conforms to the development standards of the Rancho Vistoso PAD and Recreation/Golf Course zoning district by limiting uses within the zoning area to only parking, refuse, and recreation facilities. The planned trail within the rezoning boundary is proposed to be moved to the adjacent Preserve connecting existing trails in the Preserve to the sidewalk along Vistoso Highlands Drive (shown in orange in graphic at right). A condition has been included in Attachment 1 - Item B to require installation of the trail prior to issuance of building permits. The request is in conformance with the PAD and applicable Zoning Code standards. ITEM B- DEVELOPMENT AND LANDSCAPE PLANS (ATTACHMENTS 3 AND 4) This item includes the applicant's proposed Development and Landscape Plans for the proposed site design. The site design (shown below) includes: 132 multifamily units Maximum building height of 32 feet/ 2 stories 2 access points off Vistoso Highlands Drive Recreational amenities Trail connections The applicant's site design includes three components, including: 1. The "clubhouse property" zoned High Density Residential (outlined in red) where multifamily units are entitled as a permitted use. Note, this is the only portion of the property where multifamily units are proposed. 2. The "rezoning property" (outlined in blue) discussed in Item A where parking, refuse, and recreational facilities are proposed. The trail (shown in orange) is proposed to be moved onto Town property within the preserve. 3. The "expansion or easement property" (outlined in yellow) where only parking and drainage facilities associated with the proposed development are proposed. The "Agreement" enabled use of approximately 1.5 acres of land within the Preserve for parking and drainage, while the current design proposed use of approximately 1.9 acres. A condition has been included in Attachment 1 - Item B to revise the site plan to reduce encroachment to 1.5 acres. Several minor conditions have been included in Attachment 1 - Item B to address remaining "clean-up" items. With these conditions, the proposed plans are consistent with the Rancho Vistoso PAD and all applicable Zoning Code requirements. ITEM C - ARCHITECTURE (ATTACHMENT 5) This item includes the applicant's architecture (shown below) for the proposed development. The design incorporates the following: Four-sided architecture A mix of desert colors, textures and materials Varied roof and wall planes Parapet walls to screen rooftop mechanical equipment All accessory buildings (e.g. clubhouse, maintenance building, refuse enclosures, etc.) will utilize the same architectural design aesthetic. The design has been approved by the Vistoso Community Association and meets all Rancho Vistoso PAD and applicable Zoning Code standards. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION The public participation process for the applicant's project has been extensive. An informational video was posted on www.OVprojects.com and two neighborhood meetings were held. Both meetings were well attended with in-depth discussions regarding the applicant's project. Conversations focused on: Apartments Traffic Neighborhood Compatibility One of the more frequent discussion topics was existing construction traffic in the area using the Vistoso Highlands gate (the back gate) to enter Stone Canyon. Though the applicant's project has no bearing on this existing situation, the Town Engineer has worked with adjacent Home Owners Associations to address the issue moving forward. Starting February 1, vehicles entering the back gate will no longer be able to "stop, stand, or idle" during the hours of 5am to 9am. Summaries of the meetings are provided in Attachment 7. Staff have received additional correspondence regarding the project which has been provided in Attachment 8. Staff recommends conditional approval of Item A, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1 - Item A, conditional approval of Item B, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1 - Item B and approval of Item C. The recommendations for Items B and C depend on the recommendation for Item A. BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: The applicant's proposal (shown at right) to develop 132 multifamily units requires the following applications: Item A: Rezoning (PAD Amendment) from Open Space to Recreation/Golf Course and relocate an existing trail to Town property Item B: Development and Landscape Plans Item C: Architecture SITE HISTORY 1987: Annexed into the Town as part of the original Rancho Vistoso PAD. Established High Density Residential (HDR) zoning on apartment parcel 1994: Golf Club at Vistoso established 2019: Golf Club at Vistoso closed 2021: Part of the agreement/formation of the Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve between the Town, Romspen, The Conservation Fund, and the applicant (Oro Valley 132, LLC) BACKGROUND The majority of the site was zoned High Density Residential (HDR) when Rancho Vistoso was first planned in 1987. The HDR zoning district permits apartments in excess of the density proposed in the applicant's request. The subject properties were part of the "Agreement" that was necessary to effectuate the final sale of the golf course property to establish the Preserve. As part of that agreement, the following elements were key: Restrict construction to a maximum of 132 multifamily units on the "clubhouse parcel" (High Density Residential permits 133 units) Reduce building heights permitted to a maximum of 2 stories (existing High Density Residential zoning permits up to 3 stories) Use of approximately 1.5 acres of Vistoso Preserve property for parking and drainage facilities. Flexibility with regard to zoning standards (no variances have been requested as part of this application) Lastly, as part of the discussions, a verbal commitment was made by the applicant (Oro Valley 132, LLC) to construct a trailhead for the Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve. The design of the trailhead has not been finalized, but a condition has been included in Attachment 1 - Item A requiring its construction prior to issuance of any building permits. APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL The applicant's site design (shown at right) includes: 132 multifamily units Max building height 32 feet/2 stories (code allows 34 feet/3 stories) 2 access points Recreational amenities Clubhouse facility Pool Dog park Tot-lot area Trail connections to Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve Relocate planned trail onto adjacent Town property within the Preserve (shown in orange) ITEM A - REZONING (ATTACHMENT 2) This item is a proposed rezoning from Open Space to Recreation/Golf Course for ONLY the western 0.69-acre parcel (shown in graphic below). The request is to change the zoning to enable development of parking, refuse, and recreation facilities associated with the applicant's site design which conforms to the Recreation/Golf Course zoning district. No apartment buildings are proposed within the rezoning boundary. A condition has been included in Attachment 1 to require development of a trailhead and associated parking on the adjacent Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve that will be open to the public and users of the Preserve. GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE All rezoning applications are reviewed for conformance with the General Plan Land Use Map, Vision, Guiding Principles, and Goals and Policies. The following section provides analysis relative to the consistency of the rezoning request with the General Plan Land Use Map, Vision and key Goals and Policies. Land Use Map The subject property is designated as Open Space on the General Plan Land Use Map. This designation is defined as: This land use designation represents areas that are natural open space that have been preserved through zoning, conservation easements or public ownership. Both the existing (Open Space) and proposed (Recreational/Golf Course) zoning districts are permitted within the Open Space land use designation (see Land Use Designations and Zoning table on page 49 of the General Plan). Vision The General Plan Vision states: Oro Valley strives to be a well-managed community that provides all residents with opportunities for quality living. Oro Valley will keep its friendly, small-town, neighborly character, while increasing services, employment and recreation. The Town's lifestyle continues to be defined by a strong sense of community, high regard for public safety and an extraordinary natural environment and scenic views. Goals and Policies The proposal is consistent with several General Plan Goals and Policies. Of the 87 goals and policies analyzed, 3 were applicable. The following are noteworthy: A community with a wide range of services, amenities, shopping and dining opportunities and housing types that meet the needs of current and future residents (Community Goal D) Effective transitions between differing land uses and intensities in the community (Development Goal X). Support the development of diverse housing types within the community (Complete Community Policy CC.7) Provide diverse land uses that meet the Town's overall needs and effectively transition in scale and density adjacent to neighborhoods (Land Use Policy LU.5) The subject property is designated as Open Space on the General Plan Land Use Map. Both the existing zoning (Open Space) and the proposed zoning (Recreation/Golf Course) are consistent with the General Plan Open Space Land Use category. The applicant's proposal is to develop only parking, refuse, and recreation facilities within the rezoning area, no apartments, to accommodate the adjacent, entitled multifamily proposal. The applicant's proposal is in conformance with the Your Voice, Our Future General Plan. ZONING CODE CONFORMANCE Planned Area Development (PAD) Amendment (rezoning) requests are also reviewed for conformance with the applicable PAD (in this case the Rancho Vistoso PAD), specifically the development standards of the proposed zoning district, and any applicable standards of the Town of Oro Valley Zoning Code. The applicant is requesting a rezone of the property from Rancho Vistoso Open Space to Rancho Vistoso Recreation/Golf Course, the same as the adjacent Preserve. The planned trail within the rezoning boundary is proposed to be moved to the adjacent Preserve connecting existing trails in the Preserve to the sidewalk along Vistoso Highlands Drive (shown in orange in graphic at right). A condition has been included in Attachment 1 - Item B to require installation of the trail prior to issuance of building permits. The Tentative Development Plan (Attachment 6 and shown at right) conforms to the development standards of the Rancho Vistoso PAD and Recreation/Golf Course zoning district. ITEM B- DEVELOPMENT AND LANDSCAPE PLANS (ATTACHMENT 3 AND 4) This item includes the applicant's proposed Development and Landscape Plans for the proposed site design. The applicant's site design (shown at right) includes: 132 multifamily units Max building height 32 feet/2 stories (code allows 34 feet/3 stories) 2 access points Recreational amenities Clubhouse facility Pool Dog park Tot-lot area Trail connections to Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve Relocate an existing trail onto Town property within the Preserve (shown in orange) The applicant's site design includes three components (depicted in graphic above), including: 1. The "clubhouse property" zoned High Density Residential (outlined in red) where multifamily units are entitled as a permitted use. Note, this is the only property where multifamily units are proposed. 2. The "rezoning property" (outlined in blue) discussed in Item A where parking, refuse, and recreational facilities are proposed. 3. The "expansion or easement property" (outlined in yellow) where only parking and drainage facilities associated with the proposed development are proposed. The Agreement enabled use of approximately 1.5 acres of land within the Preserve for parking and drainage facilities associated with the applicant's development. The current design depicted in Attachment 3 proposes to use approximately 1.9 acres of Town land within the Preserve. A condition has been included in Attachment 1 - Item B to revise the site plan to reflect the 1.5 acre requirement. The following development standards are notable for this proposal: Building Heights: The HDR zoning district allows a maximum building height of 34 feet/3 stories. The applicant is proposing all two-story structures with a maximum building height of 32 feet. There is a mix of 1 and 2-story buildings along Vistoso Highlands Road, so the applicant's proposal is consistent with the area. Neighborhood Compatibility: Though immediate homes are single-story, the applicant's proposed design is consistent with other two-story developments along Vistoso Highlands Drive further east toward Rancho Vistoso Boulevard. While there are no multifamily units in the area, apartments are entitled as a permitted use in the existing High Density Residential (HDR) zoning district. Pedestrian Connectivity: The applicants design includes both on-site and off-site pedestrian connections. All rental units are connected to parking areas, the leasing office and all recreational amenities. Lastly, there are connections to the adjacent Preserve and connections to the larger pedestrian circulation network in the area. Access/Circulation: The applicant's proposed design includes two access points via Vistoso Highlands Drive. The site design includes all required bufferyards and incorporates drought- tolerant, Sonoran Desert plants. Several minor conditions have been included in Attachment 1 - Item B to address remaining "clean-up" items. With these conditions, the proposed plans are consistent with the Rancho Vistoso PAD and all applicable Zoning Code requirements. The proposed plans are consistent with the Rancho Vistoso PAD and all applicable Zoning Code requirements. ITEM C - ARCHITECTURE (ATTACHMENT 5) This item includes the applicant's architecture for the proposed development. The design (shown below) incorporates the following: Four-sided architecture A mix of desert colors, textures and materials Varied roof and wall planes Parapet walls to screen rooftop mechanical equipment All accessory buildings (e.g. clubhouse, maintenance building, refuse enclosures, etc.) will utilize the same architectural design aesthetic. These applications are reviewed for conformance with the Rancho Vistoso PAD and all applicable Design Principles and Standards of the Zoning Code. A summary of the applications' conformance with each is provided below. RANCHO VISTOSO PAD ANALYSIS The applicant's request includes desert southwest colors and materials utilizing shades of earth tones, roof tiles, stucco, wood accents and stone. The proposed architecture is consistent with the requirements of the Rancho Vistoso PAD and has been reviewed and approved by the Vistoso Community Association. ZONING CODE ANALYSIS Design Principles Architecture applications are reviewed for conformance with the Design Principles of the Zoning Code. The Design Principles are listed below in italics, followed by staff commentary. Building Design shall be appropriate for the climate and characteristics of the Sonoran Desert, including indigenous and traditional textures, colors, and shapes found in and around Oro Valley. All development shall maintain and strengthen the high quality of design exemplified in Oro Valley through project creativity and design excellence. The applicant's proposed architecture incorporates colors and materials common to the Sonoran Desert, including earth-tone colors, stucco, clay roof tiles, wood accents and stone. The request is consistent with this design principle. Building scale, height and mass shall be consistent with the Town-approved intensity of the site, designated scenic corridors, and valued mountain views. Buildings, shall be designed to respect the scale of adjoining areas and should mitigate the negative and functional impacts that arise from scale, bulk and mass. Per the "Agreement", the multifamily units are limited to 32 feet/two-stories (less than the entitled 34 feet/3 stories of the High Density Residential zoning district. While a majority of surrounding development is single-story, there are two-story developments east on Vistoso Highlands Drive. The site design is broken up into 7 buildings which include roof and wall plane variations to help break-up the massing of each structure. The request is consistent with this design principle. All building facades shall be fully articulated, including variation in building massing, roof planes, wall planes, and surface articulation. Architectural elements including, but not limited to overhangs, trellis, projections, awnings, insets, material, and texture shall be used to create visual interest that contributes to a building's character. The buildings include appropriate roof and wall plane variations to help break-up the massing of each structure. All windows are inset to decrease solar impacts on the units. A variety of colors and textures are used to fully articulate all four sides of the design. The request is consistent with this design principle. Building design and screening strategies shall be implemented to conceal the view of loading areas, refuse enclosures, mechanical equipment, appurtenances, and utilities from adjacent public streets and neighborhoods. All refuse areas will include the code required self-closing gates and walls to ensure they are fully screened from public view. All mechanical equipment, whether roof or ground mounted, will be required to be fully screened from view. The request is consistent with this design principle. Design Standards The architecture was also reviewed for conformance with the Design Standards of the Zoning Code. Several key applicable standards are listed below: Consider the design of all sides of a building ("four sided architecture") Accessory structures...shall reflect the character of the...development theme. Substantial materials, including stucco, brick, adobe, natural stone, textured concrete...shall predominate. The applicant's architectural theme incorporates materials, colors and textures common to the Sonoran Desert and consistent with surrounding architectural styles. Overall, the applicant's request is generally consistent with the Design Standards of the Zoning Code. The applicant's architecture has been approved by the Vistoso Community Association and meets all Rancho Vistoso PAD and applicable Zoning Code standards. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Notices were sent for the Public Hearings as follows: Notices to all property owners within 1000 feet (distance increased in some areas to ensure entire subdivisions were notified) Notification to additional interested parties who asked to be added during the neighborhood meeting process Homeowners Association mailings Advertisement in The Daily Territorial newspaper Postings on the property Posting at Town Hall and on the Town website An informational video was posted on www.OVprojectsc.om and two neighborhood meetings were held. The meetings were well attended with in-depth discussions regarding the applicant's proposal. One of the more frequent discussion topics was existing construction traffic in the area using the Vistoso Highlands gate (the back gate) to enter Stone Canyon. Though the applicant's project has no bearing on this existing situation, the Town Engineer has worked with adjacent Homeowners Associations to address the issue moving forward. Starting February 1, signage will be erected indicating that vehicles entering the back gate will no longer be able to "stop, stand, or idle" during the hours of 5am to 9am. OVPD will have the authority to enforce this provision. Summaries of each meeting are provided in Attachment 7. Staff have received additional neighbor correspondence which has been provided in Attachment 8. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION The applicant intends to develop 132 two-story apartment units. To accommodate this design the applicant is proposing the following: Item A: Rezoning for a portion of the subject property (~0.69 acres) from Open Space to Recreation/Golf Course and to relocate a planned trail to adjacent Town property. Item B: Development and Landscape Plans for the development Item C: Architecture Several key aspects of the applicant's request include: 1. The old clubhouse site (where apartments are proposed) has been zoned High Density Residential (HDR), which entitles multifamily as a permitted use, since Rancho Vistoso was first planned in 1987. 2. The properties were part of the Settlement Agreement (the "Agreement") that formed the Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve. i. Stipulations were included that enabled the applicant (Oro Valley 132, LLC) to construct up to 132 apartments and use of approximately 1.5 acres of Preserve land for parking and drainage purposes associated with the development. ii. The applicant has agreed to construct a trailhead (approximately 21 spaces) within the adjacent Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve at no cost to the Town (condition included in Attachment 1 - Item A). 3. Development within the rezoning boundary for Item A includes only parking, refuse, and recreational facilities, consistent with the proposed zoning district of Recreation/Golf Course. 4. The rezoning also proposes to relocate a planned trail onto adjacent Town property in the Preserve. 5. The Development and Landscape Plan, with the conditions listed in Attachment 1 - Item B, and Architecture are consistent with the Rancho Vistoso PAD and all applicable Zoning Code requirements. 6. A condition has been included in Attachment 1 - Item B (Development and Landscape Plans) to revise the site design to limit encroachment into Town property to 1.5 acres for parking and drainage facilities. 7. The applicant's proposed design has been approved by the Vistoso Community Association. Staff recommends conditional approval of Item A, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1 - Item A, conditional approval of Item B, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1 - Item B and approval of Item C. The recommendations for Items B and C are dependent on the recommendation for Item A. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A SUGGESTED MOTION: The Planning and Zoning Commission may wish to consider one of the following motions: ITEM A - REZONING I MOVE to recommend CONDITIONAL APPROVAL, subject to the conditions listed in Attachment 1 - Item A, of the proposed rezoning from Open Space to Recreation/Golf Course based on a finding the request is in conformance with the General Plan and Rancho Vistoso PAD. OR I MOVE to recommend DENIAL of the proposed rezoning based on a finding that ______________________________. ITEM B - DEVELOPMENT AND LANDSCAPE PLAN I MOVE to recommend CONDITIONAL APPROVAL, subject to the conditions listed in Attachment 1 - Item B, of the proposed Development and Landscape Plans based on a finding the requests are in conformance with the Rancho Vistoso PAD and all applicable Zoning Code requirements. OR I MOVE to recommend DENIAL of the proposed Development and Landscape Plan based on a finding that ______________________. ITEM C - ARCHITECTURE I MOVE to recommend APPROVAL of the proposed Architecture based on a finding the request is in conformance with the Rancho Vistoso PAD and all applicable Zoning Code requirements. OR I MOVE to recommend DENIAL of the proposed Architecture based on a finding that ________________________. Attachments ATTACHMENT 1 - CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ATTACHMENT 2 - APPLICANT'S SITE ANALYSIS ATTACHMENT 3 - APPLICANT'S DEVELOPMENT PLAN SET ATTACHMENT 4 - APPLICANT'S LANDSCAPE PLAN SET ATTACHMENT 5 - APPLICANT'S ARCHITECTURE SET ATTACHMENT 6 - APPLICANT'S TENTATIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN ATTACHMENT 7 - NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING SUMMARIES ATTACHMENT 8 - ADDITIONAL NEIGHBOR CORRESPONDENCE D R A F T MINUTES ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR SESSION February 6, 2024 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CAÑADA DRIVE            REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM   CALL TO ORDER Chair Clark called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.   ROLL CALL Present: Robert Kellar, Commissioner Joe Nichols, Commissioner William Thomas, Commissioner Sandra Wilson, Commissioner Philip Zielinski, Commissioner Kimberly Outlaw Ryan, Vice Chair Anna Clark, Chair Staff Present:Michael Spaeth, Principal Planner David Laws, Permitting Manager Joe Andrews, Chief Civil Deputy Attorney Paul Melcher, Community and Economic Development Director Attendees: Melanie Barrett, Town Council Liaison PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Chair Clark led the Commission and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance.   CALL TO AUDIENCE There were no speaker requests.   COUNCIL LIAISON COMMENTS Council Liaison Melanie Barrett provided updates on recent and upcoming Town Council meetings, as related to Planning agenda items.   REGULAR SESSION AGENDA   1.REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE JANUARY 12, 2024 STUDY SESSION AND JANUARY 16, 2024    1.REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE JANUARY 12, 2024 STUDY SESSION AND JANUARY 16, 2024 SPECIAL SESSION MEETING MINUTES       Motion by Commissioner Joe Nichols, seconded by Commissioner William Thomas to approve the January 12, 2024 and January 16, 2024 meeting minutes.  Vote: 7 - 0 Carried   2.PRESENTATION ABOUT THE COMMUNITY'S EFFORT TO CREATE THE NEXT 10-YEAR PLAN, KNOWN AS OV'S PATH FORWARD       Principal Planner Milini Simms provided a presentation that included the following: - Purpose - Community Engagement - Process - Awareness and education - Online engagement - Community events - Phase 1: Community participation - Join the discussion Discussion ensued among the Commission and staff.   3.PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THREE ITEMS RELATED TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF 132 MULTIFAMILY UNITS ON AN APPROXIMATELY 8.7-ACRE SITE LOCATED ON VISTOSO HIGHLANDS DRIVE, APPROXIMATELY 1/4-MILE WEST OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD (ON THE OLD CLUBHOUSE SITE). THE APPLICATIONS INCLUDE: ITEM A: REZONING APPROXIMATELY 0.7 ACRES (PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT) FROM OPEN SPACE TO RECREATION /GOLF COURSE AND TO RELOCATE A PLANNED TRAIL TO ADJACENT TOWN PROPERTY ITEM B: DEVELOPMENT AND LANDSCAPE PLANS ITEM C: ARCHITECTURE       Principal Planner Michael Spaeth provided a presentation that included the following: - Purpose - Location map - Applicant's proposal - Background and site history - Item A: Rezoning - Item A: Rezoning - General Plan and Zoning conformance - Item B: Development and landscape plans - Item C: Architecture - Public participation - Summary and recommendation    Rory Juneman of Lazarus & Silvyn, representing the applicant, introduced Ross Rulney (developer), Kevin Hall (civil engineer), Daniel Bradshaw (landscape architect), Grace Schau and Burak Bekat (architects). Mr. Juneman provided a presentation that included the following: - Project location - Background of the Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve process Mr. Rulney spoke about the history of the project, and the process of both the settlement and easement agreements. Mr. Juneman then continued with the presentation: - Rezoning - Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development - Development package - Open space - Landscape plan - Architectural elevations - Color palette - Conditions    Chair Clark opened the public hearing. The following individuals spoke in opposition to Agenda Item 3: - Oro Valley resident Chris Westermeyer - Oro Valley resident Judi Davis - Oro Valley resident Joseph Bell - Oro Valley resident Patrick Straney - Oro Valley resident Teresa Marro - Oro Valley resident Christine Moffat - Oro Valley resident Alan Ameche - Oro Valley resident Linette Mock - Oro Valley resident Karen Stemper - Oro Valley resident Sally Hood West - Oro Valley resident Pat Tebo - Oro Valley resident Chuck Davis - Oro Valley resident Jeff Halbach - Oro Valley resident Tim Keeland - Oro Valley resident Ken Chaney - Oro Valley resident Susann Ventzke - Oro Valley resident Gayle Cerri - Oro Valley resident Richard Cerri - Oro Valley resident Steve Roell - Oro Valley resident Heidi Lackey The following individuals spoke in support of Agenda Item 3: - Oro Valley resident Rosa Dailey - Don Riegger Chair Clark closed the public hearing. The Commission took a recess at 7:47 p.m. The Commission resumed the meeting at 7:53 p.m.    Chair Clark asked staff and the applicant to address questions raised during the public hearing. Chair Clark opened the floor for discussion, comments and questions by the Commission. Discussion ensued among the Commission, staff and the applicant.    Motion by Commissioner William Thomas, seconded by Vice Chair Kimberly Outlaw Ryan to recommend conditional approval, subject to the conditions listed in Attachment 1 - Item A and the other conditions agreed to, of the proposed rezoning from Open Space to Recreation/Golf Course based on a finding the request is in conformance with the General Plan and Rancho Vistoso PAD.    Chair Clark offered a Friendly Amendment to the motion to specify the added conditions: prior to building permit issuance, all components of the trailhead and the cart path connection be constructed on the adjacent Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve, it must include 21 spaces on a decomposed granite or similar surface, a paved connection route to Visotoso Highlands Drive, ADA paved parking spaces, ADA compliant path to the existing trails within the Preserve, and final design installation and inspections shall be subject to Parks and Recreation Director, Town Engineer and Planning approval. The Motioner and Seconder accepted the amendment.    A roll call vote was taken, with each Commissioner explaining their vote. Commissioner Kellar - Aye Nichols - Nay Thomas - Aye Wilson - Aye Zielinski - Nay Outlaw Ryan - Aye Chair Clark - Aye    Vote: 5 - 2 Carried  OPPOSED: Commissioner Joe Nichols  Commissioner Philip Zielinski    The Commission took a short recess at 8:51 p.m. and resumed the meeting at 8:54 p.m.    Motion by Vice Chair Kimberly Outlaw Ryan, seconded by Commissioner Philip Zielinski to recommend conditional approval subject to the conditions listed in Attachment 1 - Item B, of the proposed Development and Landscape Plans based on a finding the requests are in conformance with the Rancho Vistoso PAD and all applicable Zoning Code requirements.    Chair Clark offered a Friendly Amendment to strike the second condition (All structures, not including the required screenwall, shall be removed from the Town property and conservation easement area adjacent to the southern edge of parcel 219-19-1910. The siteplan must be revised accordingly.), listed in Attachment 1 - Item B. The Motioner and Seconder accepted the amendment.    Vote: 6 - 1 Carried  OPPOSED: Commissioner Joe Nichols    Motion by Commissioner Joe Nichols, seconded by Commissioner William Thomas to recommend approval of the proposed Architecture based on a finding the request is in conformance with the Rancho Vistoso PAD and all applicable Zoning Code requirements.  Vote: 7 - 0 Carried     4.DISCUSSION REGARDING THE TOWN'S GROWTH AND REMAINING LAND       Principal Planner Milini Simms provided a presentation that included the following: - Importance - Overview of land development - Historical development patterns - Single-family permits issuance history - Residential forecast - Rancho Vistoso - Non-residential forecast - Considerations for the future Discussion ensued among the Commission and staff.   PLANNING UPDATE (INFORMATIONAL ONLY) Principal Planner Michael Spaeth provided updates on an upcoming neighborhood meeting and the next Commission meeting.   ADJOURNMENT    Motion by Commissioner William Thomas, seconded by Commissioner Sandra Wilson to adjourn the meeting.    Chair Clark adjourned the meeting at 9:15 p.m.     I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the regular session of the Town of Oro Valley Planning and Zoning Commission of Oro Valley, Arizona held on the 5th day of February 2024. I further certify that the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present. ___________________________ Jeanna Ancona Senior Office Specialist Public Hearing: Vistoso Highlands Rezoning, Development/Landscape Plans, Amended Easement Agreement and Architecture Town Council March 20, 2024 Purpose Applicant’s proposal Construction of a 132 unit Apartment Complex Enabled since 1987 Public Hearing for applicant’s requests: Item A: Rezoning (PAD Amendment) from Open Space to Recreation/Golf Course and to move a trail onto Town property within the Preserve Item B: Development and Landscape Plans Item C: Amended Easement Agreement Item D: Architecture PZC recommendation on February 6, 2024 Rezoning (PAD Amendment) Development and Landscape Plans Architecture Discussion and possible action Location Map Background and Site History Development Areas 1.Clubhouse parcel: High Density Residential 2.Parking/Drainage “expansion area” in Preserve: Recreation/Golf Course 3.Rezoning parcel: Open Space Timeline of Key Events 1987: Rancho Vistoso PAD Zoning Approved 1994: Golf Club at Vistoso opened 2016: Your Voice, Our Future General Plan 2019: Golf Club closed 2022: Settlement & Easement Agreements Apartments & “reasonable zoning relief” Use of “approximately 1.5 acres” of Preserve property as limited development “expansion area” 1 2 3 General Plan Designations Item A: Rezone: Open Space Designation Proposed zoning must comport with Designation Open Space accommodates proposed Golf/Rec Zoning Item B: Development Plan under Current Zoning Medium Density Residential Designation does not match existing High Density Residential zoning “These designations are policy recommendations only and may not reflect the actual zoning designation of the property.” Your Voice, Our Future Existing zoning of High Density Residential prevails as the applicant’s legal property right. Item A: Rezone Item B: Development Plan General Plan Land Use Item A: Rezoning Rezoning (Planned Area Development Amendment) Open Space to Recreation/Golf Course Parking, refuse, and recreation Preserve Trailhead Parking Area and relocate paved trail at southern boundary Minimize disruption to Preserve users Relocate earthern hiking trail onto Town property Proposed new Preserve trailhead parking lot and trail locations Item A: Rezoning Conditions require: Applicant to construct trailhead parking area up to $50,000. Remainder covered by Rec Impact Fees generated by property owner Temporary trailhead parking lot prior to demolition of existing one Finished, permanent, trailhead parking lot prior to Certificate of Occupancy for apartments New, permanent, paved trail at southern edge prior to demolition of existing cart path New earthen hiking trail connecting Vistoso Highlands Dr. sidewalk and existing cart path. Item B: Development and Landscape Plans Development Plan Seven (7) buildings, 132 Units at 32’, 2 Stories 2 access points and traffic study Landscaped Open Space & Recreational amenities Trail connections Expansion area in Preserve (245 spaces vs. 255 spaces) “Approximately 1.5 acres” vs 1.89 acres proposed Landscape Plan Bufferyards Screenwalls/Parking Screenwalls Revegetation of all disturbed areas Item C: Amended Easement Agreement Paved/Impervious surface: ~1.36 acres Parking area, landscape islands, covered parking ~117 parking spaces with 5’ screen wall Drainage basins: ~0.53 acres Revegetated with native landscaping Rocks “Approximately 1.5 acres” vs 1.89 acres proposed Item D: Architecture Four -sided Architecture Varied roof lines and wall planes Desert colors, materials, and textures Public Participation Informational Video Two (2) Neighborhood Meetings Common themes: Traffic Compatibility Apartments Existing construction traffic issue Summary and Recommendation Proposed multifamily units (132) Apartments, density, & building heights permitted by zoning Settlement and Easement Agreements Preserve Parking Lot and Trails PZC recommends approval of Items A and B (with conditions) and Item D Staff recommends approval of Item C Four motions required Item A: Rezoning (PAD Amendment) Item B: Development and Landscape Plans Item C: Amended Easement Agreement Item D: Architecture Conditions – Item A 1.In order to minimize the time during which public access to the Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve (“Preserve”) is interrupted, applicant will: a.Leave open to the public the existing parking lot (“Old Lot”) at 955 W Vistoso Highlands Dr. (“Property”), and the existing trail on the adjacent parcel 219-19-1840 (“Old Trail”) until a temporary parking is established on Town property. b.For the new Preserve trail (“New Trail”) as identified on DP 2301236 and located south of the Easement Area south of the Property, a temporary trail comprised of DG or similar material, subject to Parks & Recreation Director and Planning Manager approval, will be provided prior to demolition of the Old Trail in order to maintain uninterrupted access for the Preserve trail system. The final improved New Tra il shall be completed prior to the issuance of the apartment project certificate of occupancy (“CO”). c.For the new Preserve parking lot (“New Lot”), grading and temporary improvements of the New Lot, subject to Town Engineer and Parks & Recreation Director approval, shall occur prior to the demolition of the Old Lot in order to limit interruption to available Preserve parking. d.Prior to the issuance of the CO, all components of the New Lot shall be constructed to include 21 spaces on a decomposed granite (or similar) surface, a paved connection to Vistoso Highlands Drive, two ADA paved parking spaces, and an ADA compliant path to the existing trails within the Preserve. Final design, installation, and inspection shall be subject to Parks and Recreation Director, Town Engineer, and Planning Manager approval. e.Applicant will be responsible for the cost of constructing the parking lot, with the following conditions: for any cost of construction above $50,000.00, applicant will receive Parks development impact fee credits, and the applicant’s costs to construct the parking lot shall not exceed the amount of the project’s total Parks Impact Fee plus $50,000.00. 2.The exact location of the trail on Town property near the west side of parcel 219-19-1840 must be field verified and approved by the Parks and Recreation Director prior to installation. It must be installed in accordance with Town standards prior to Certificate of Occupancy for the apartment development. Conditions – Items B & C ITEM B Planning 1.Use of the Town property and conservation easement area adjacent to the southern edge of parcel 219-19-1910 shall be reduced to no more than 1.5 acres in total area. The site plan must be revised accordingly subject to Planning and Zoning Administrator approval. Stormwater 1.The proposed erosion hazard setback must be a minimum of 15 feet off the top of the bank per Town Ordinance 17-5-9(A). Revise accordingly. (Development Plan sheet 4 & Drainage Report page 35). 2.Finished floor elevation must be a minimum of 1 foot above the upstream adjacent to the Q100 water surfaces elevation. Revise accordingly. (Development Plan sheet 9). Revise accordingly. 3.Show all off-site channel improvements within an easement. Including wall toe down, erosion protection, etc. (Development Plan sheet 9). 4.Show maintenance access into the adjacent wash and how someone would access the culvert and the walls along the wash to maintain them. Dashed lines can be used to show the proposed maintenance path. (Development Plan sheet 9). 5.Show elevation on this sheet. (Development Plan sheet 11). 6.Show Water Surface Elevations. (Development plan sheet 12). ITEM C 1.A revised legal description and survey shall be provided to reflect the final extent of encroachment into the “Easement Area” as approved in the associated Development Plan (Item B), subject to the Planning and Zoning Administrator and Town Engineer approval.    Town Council Regular Session 3. Meeting Date:03/20/2024   Requested by: Paul Keesler Submitted By:Paul Keesler, Public Works Department:Public Works SUBJECT: REQUESTING FUNDING FOR THE CREATION OF AN ALTERNATIVE GOLF ROUTE AT PUSCH RIDGE GOLF COURSE ALONG HOLE #7 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends at a minimum, funding the construction of an alternative golf route that bypasses the existing bridge within Hole #7. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The golf path bridge on Hole #7 of the Pusch golf course has been deemed unfit for use and has been closed. This bridge was an integral part of the golf path routing, crossing an existing wash, connecting Hole #7 tee to Hole #7 green: Staff, in coordination with our golf operator Indigo, have designed a new alternative route that removes the need for this bridge crossing: The purpose of this evening's Council agenda item is to request a maximum of $242,000 for the construction of said bypass route, to replace an existing portion of the original irrigation line within this routing and to demolish the existing bridge and portions of the existing golf path. The breakdown of this request is outlined in the Fiscal Impact section of this communication.   BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: As far as the staff knows, this bridge has provided approximately 40 years of incident-free service. However, since the industry standard for bridge service life is 40 to 50 years, staff understood that at some point in the near future, we would need to conduct a structural evaluation and possible repairs or replacement of the Hole #7 golf path bridge. However, at the February 7th Town Council meeting, it was disclosed by audience speakers that members of the Friends of Pusch Ridge Golf took it upon themselves to conduct some "repairs". Since this is a simple welded structure consisting of:  One support pier chair Two abutments Two girder beams Diamond plate bridge decking Handrail and given the statements of "repairs" by community members, staff needed to immediately review what had been done and visited the site on February 8th. During this visit, Engineering staff, including the Town Engineer, were able to ascertain the following:  The "repairs" Friends of Pusch Ridge Golf conducted consisted of fresh painting the top of the deck and handrail, as well as adding a wood beam under the structure, and did not add or deter the structural carrying capacity of the bridge. We discovered that there were several welds on the diamond plate decking that had broken. From under the bridge, observing golf carts passing overhead, these broken welds were separating and deflecting enough that it caused concern that the bridge was no longer structurally stable. Due to the simplicity of this structure, the diamond plate decking is one of only 4 structural elements holding the bridge up. We needed to move up the future structural evaluation to right now. On February 20, 2024, the Town contracted with a structural engineering consultant, Structural Concepts Inc., to evaluate the bridge. The consultant visited the site on February 22nd to gather necessary information to conduct an evaluation. Upon completion of the structural evaluation, Structural Concepts contacted the Town and requested that the bridge be immediately taken out of service because it is no longer structurally sound. The main issues are the following:  The diamond plate comprising the bridge deck is of inadequate cross-sectional thickness and is overstressed, The structural section of the girders supporting the diamond plate deck is at capacity (i.e., no factor of safety) if new. Thus, given the degree of corrosion and delamination of the girders, causing a reduction in cross-section area of the member, is concerning with regard to current capacity. Rusting/delamination of the web is observed at the bearing points (i.e., pier and abutments) where shear is at its maximum. The web is the transfer element of the girder, thus a significant concern.  The full structural assessment of this structure is attached to this communication as Attachment A. Staff and the Town's golf operator, Indigo, took an all-hands onboard approach to address this issue. Public Works staff closed the bridge by welding bars across the handrail to prevent golfers from crossing. Indigo created a temporary play approach by shortening the play of Hole #8 and rerouting Hole #7 play around the bridge, partially using adjacent streets and some golf path back-routing. Thus, Indigo was able to keep all nine holes open. And staff was able to site an alternative routing of Hole #7 that passes through the wash with an at-grade crossing where the flow is low and broad. It is this alternative route that staff is requesting Council to fund. In addition, there is an existing irrigation main that somewhat follows the alignment of the new alternative path. Staff is proposing replacement of this section of main in case there is a main break. The irrigation system is 40 years old and a main break within this section could destroy this new golf path alignment. This main replacement is not required, rather it's insurance against future disruptions. The cost to demolish the bridge and associated path is $65,000. This is just an estimate with the contractor providing a hard bid before the Council meeting. Staff will update this cost at the meeting.   FISCAL IMPACT: The cost breakdown of this project is:  Construction of a paved alternative golf route - $112,000 Replacement of the existing irrigation main - $65,000 Existing bridge demolition - $65,000 The total project cost is up to $242,000, and this includes a 10% contingency over contractor bid. The Council may choose to fund none, part or all of the above. If partially funded, a minimum of $112,000 is required for the core purpose of creating the replacement path around the bridge.  This funding is to be sourced from General Fund Reserves. SUGGESTED MOTION: I approve (or deny) funding an alternative golf path to bypass the existing Hole #7 bridge, (and additional project items listed above), for $________ , sourced from General Fund Reserves. Attachments Attachment A - Bridge Structural Analysis  Staff Presentation  Phone (520) 721-2324 Fax (520) 885-3507 8230 E. Broadway, Suite W-7, Tucson, Arizona 85710 8 March 2024 Mr. John Lynch, PE, RLS Stormwater Project Manager Public Works Town of Oro Valley Stormwater Utility 680 W. Calle Concordia Oro Valley, Arizona 85704 jlynch@orovalleyaz.gov Subject: Pusch Ridge Golf Course Hole 7 Bridge Assessment Report Owner: Town of Oro Valley SCI Project # 24-111 Dear Mr. Lynch: In accordance with your request, we have completed a structural review for a 40-foot, 2-span steel girder bridge located near Hole 7 of the Pusch Ridge Golf Course in Oro Valley (Photo 1, 2). It is our understanding that the Town of Oro Valley (TOV) would like to document the condition of the bridge and determine the safety and suitability of the bridge to carry its intended traffic. The TOV has requested Structural Concepts Inc. (SCI) to perform a structural inspection and preliminary assessment of safety concerns for the users of the bridge. This evaluation started with an on-site inspection of the bridge on February 22, 2024, by Manuel Naves, PE, SE, and Keegan Battraw from SCI, accompanied by Mr. John Lynch, who represented the Town of Oro Valley during the visit. The inspection involved a visual review of both the bridge superstructure and substructure. Additionally, we examined previous written and photographic documentation of the bridge to formulate an opinion regarding its structural integrity and suitability for its intended use. All referenced photographs and images are included in an attached Photographic Report. Description of Structure Background Information Based on the information shared by you during our inspection, we understand that the bridge was originally built in the late 1980’s and has had a number of repairs and modifications made since that time. Documentation of such modification was not available at the time of this writing. During our visit, one modification that was evident is the extension of the bridge deck, which is SCI Project 24-111 Hole 7 Bridge Assessment Report 8 March 2024 Page 2 cantilevering approximately 12” past the edge of the main beams on each side of the bridge (Photo 3). The bridge is intended to carry primarily golf carts, maintenance equipment, and pedestrian traffic through this section of the course, spanning over a small channel; regular vehicular traffic (cars, light trucks) is not intended to cross the bridge. Bridge Superstructure The superstructure of the bridge comprises two 8-inch wide-flange main steel girders, extending continuously over two spans of approximately 20 feet each, connecting concrete abutments and a central steel pier. The girders are spaced at approximately 5 feet 7 inches on-center. Based on our on-site measurements during the inspection, it is assumed that the girders match a W8x18 AISC structural steel section (Photo 3). A 4-inch steel channel section is laid flat and welded to the top flange along the length of the girders. Each girder is connected to the abutments and the central pier with 6-inch by 6-inch by ½-inch bearing plates. These bearing plates rest directly on the abutment or pier structure, with those on the central pier welded directly to its structure for added support (Photo 6, 8). Transverse angle braces (L3X3X1/8) are installed between girder webs at approximately 1/3- points of each span (approx. 6-foot spacing), and adjacent to the central pier (3 braces per span). Braces are installed below top-of-steel of the girders and do not make contact with the top flange of the girders at any point (Photo 11). 4X6 longitudinal timber beams are placed along the bridge centerline between the top of braces and underside of decking (Photo 5, 10). Timber beams are noticeably absent between the easternmost braces and the adjacent abutment, resulting in an approximate deck length of 6-feet without any additional middle support at the eastern end of the bridge (Photo 5). Bridge deck consists of 1/8” steel diamond plate spanning between and extending beyond girders to a full deck width of 8’-0”. Decking is unsupported outside of the bridge girders, cantilevered approximately 12” on each side (Photo 3). The deck bears on the two bridge girders and the central 4X6 timber beams on the west span of the bridge and only bears on the two bridge girders at the east span. Welded steel handrails are in place along both sides of the bridge, with vertical posts at 7’-6” on- center; posts are directly welded to the steel deck. Clear distance between handrails is 7’-4”. At each welded handrail post, two angle braces (L1-1/2 X 1-1/2 X 1/8) are welded between the edge of deck and the bottom flange of the bridge girder (Photo 4); this bracing arrangement is not in place along the south-west girder span. At the western end of the bridge, the final vertical post is located beyond the edge of the bridge deck and is welded to a 1X1 angle extending 3” over the western approach slab (Photo 14). Bridge Substructure Bridge abutments consist of partially buried concrete slabs, approximately 7’ wide (in the transverse direction); the full depth and length of abutment were not visible due to surrounding SCI Project 24-111 Hole 7 Bridge Assessment Report 8 March 2024 Page 3 soil and the approach slab above. The face of abutment appears rough and was likely not formed at time of construction (poured against excavation or undisturbed soil) (Photo 5, 12). It is unclear whether reinforcement is present within the abutment concrete. It is also unclear if girder bearing plates are anchored to abutment concrete. The central pier consists of a Ø6” welded pipe frame, approximately 4’-4” in height. The frame is supported by a concrete spread footing and pedestal (Photo 13). Pier anchorage condition was not visible. Pedestal is approximately 1’-0 x 7’-0” in plan, 1’-6” in height. Due to surrounding rock and soil, the full size of the spread footing was not visible; based on visible dimensions and assuming symmetry, we estimate the foundation as approximately 7’-3” square and at least 12” in depth. It is unclear whether reinforcement is present within the central pier foundation. It is also unclear if the central pier was part of the original construction or added later. Approach slabs are in place at each end of the bridge, consisting of a 2” to 4” thick concrete slab placed over top of the abutments and joining the asphalt paths away from the bridge (Photo 14, 15). Approach slabs are approximately the same width as the bridge deck (8’-0”) and approximately 6’ in length. It is unclear whether reinforcement is present within the approach slabs . Structural Observations The following conditions were observed during SCI’s visual inspection of the bridge structure: Bridge Superstructure - A significant amount of soil and other site material has accumulated around the girder bearing locations at each abutment. Approximately 12” to 15” at each end of the girders were buried or obscured by this debris (Photo 5, 7, 10). - At the north-east girder bearing, material was cleared revealing significant corrosion, delamination, and partial section loss of the girder within 12” of the bearing location. Section loss is primarily observed at the bottom edge of the web and the bottom flange. Other bearing locations were not visible during our on-site inspection; however, it is probable that the other girder bearing locations are in similar condition (Photo 8). - The north-west girder bearing is partially encased in concrete forming the west abutment. Its condition could not be observed; it is likely that the reduced exposure to soil and moisture has afforded some protection to the steel at this location (Photo 9). - 4X6 timber deck supports are not installed in the (approximately) 6-foot sections of the spans adjacent to each abutment. This results in higher deflections of the deck plates in these sections under load (Photo 5). - The 4X6 timber deck support at the west end of the bridge is significantly deteriorated and does not make full contact with the bridge deck above (Photo 10, 11). - Cantilevered sections of bridge deck outside of the girders are fully unsupported and likely insufficient to safely support the required loads (Photo 3, 4). - Attachment of handrails to edge of bridge deck results in significant deflections (± 5”to 6”) at top of the handrails when moved by hand. SCI Project 24-111 Hole 7 Bridge Assessment Report 8 March 2024 Page 4 - Light to moderate surface corrosion is visible on all exposed steel surfaces of the bridge structure, with exception of the painted deck surface and handrail components. Bridge Substructure - Bridge abutments appear in poor condition and moderately weathered, with exposed aggregates and a large amount of the surrounding soil having eroded or otherwise removed (Photo 3, 12). A number of broken concrete pieces are littered throughout the area, though it is unclear if these were part of the abutment structure. - The abutments are poorly finished at all visible areas, likely due to casting against a rough excavation or significant soil mixing with concrete at the interface during placement (Photo 12). Visible portions of the abutment appear as though the excavation may have collapsed during construction or may have been excavated as a rough pit. In either case, control of placement and/or cover for reinforcement would have been difficult; this is suggestive that typical reinforcement may not have been included during its construction. - The central pier and foundation appear to be in generally good condition, and mildly weathered (Photo 13). Some exposed aggregates and rough finishes were observed on the pedestal and the cold joint at the footing; however, the foundation appears to have been formed and finished in conventional fashion. Presence of reinforcement in the section could not be verified. - The western approach slab has a considerable, damaged area at its north edge adjacent to the bridge deck; the damaged area is approximately triangular, 12” x 32”, with crack widths of approximately ½” (Photo 14, 16). This section was loose and slightly movable by hand; it appears to have been repaired or patched previously. - There are indications that the approach slabs on each side of the bridge are experiencing torsional deformation across their thickness; this condition is more evident on the west side of the bridge (Photo 15, 16). Discussion of Findings Overall, the bridge structure is in poor condition; with appropriate repairs and ongoing maintenance, some of the components could have their service life extended. Soil and debris build-up around the abutments and girder bearings have accelerated corrosion of the exposed steel members. Bridge girder bearings and girder end conditions are in poor condition, and at risk of failure due to corrosion damage. Both the east and west abutments are poorly constructed and may be unreinforced. Geometrical properties are inconsistent and difficult to quantify without exploratory excavation. Given their condition, and the observed broken concrete around the abutments, further breakage of abutment concrete is possible. Abutments also appear susceptible to scour; some soil around abutments has transported and eroded over time, leaving some faces of the abutments exposed and with reduced soil bearing. This condition will likely continue to deteriorate if uncorrected. If abutments are in fact unreinforced and continue to deteriorate, a sudden brittle compressive or shear failure of this concrete at the girder bearings could occur. This could result in a partial collapse of the then - unsupported girders and deck. SCI Project 24-111 Hole 7 Bridge Assessment Report 8 March 2024 Page 5 In their current state, the abutments cannot be sufficiently defined or analyzed to provide an opinion regarding the allowable strength or remaining service life. In our opinion, due to the irregular construction and conditions, the effort and expense required to further evaluate the abutments (via excavation, rebar scans, etc.) would not be worth the potential benefit of keeping the abutments in service. A preliminary (conservative) check of the bridge girders indicates that these girders in their current state are likely being loaded at or near to their allowable strength in bending. Further analysis beyond the scope of this report will be required to verify loading conditions and develop true allowable loads for the bridge. Based on the loss of section at the web of the northeast bridge girder at its bearing, it is expected that the total shear capacity at this location has been reduced by approximately 40%. Based on a preliminary check, sufficient shear area of the beam web remains to transfer shear at the bearing. However, due to section loss at the bottom of web, some deformation or buckling of the web may occur due to the thinning in that area. A preliminary (conservative) check of the bridge decking at: 1) the overhanging edge, 2) span between girders, and 3) span between girders and 4X6 timber beam, indicates that the plate is likely to be loaded at or exceeding its allowable strength in each case (assuming 60 psf live load or 300-lb point load). Based on this check, the decking appears structurally insufficient for this loading and should not remain in service as currently configured. Based on the allowable strength of the decking noted above and the observed deflections of the handrail, structural support of the handrails is insufficient for the applicable load criteria required by building codes (IBC 2018, ASCE 7). The unsupported bridge deck and poor handrail support present a hazard to both golf cart and pedestrian traffic on the bridge and require temporary restrictions until a permanent solution can be implemented. Bridge deck support with 4X6 timbers represents an uncommon load path arrangement, with the supporting angles performing as secondary beam members, rather than horizontal braces or ties. The adequacy of this arrangement can be verified by analysis. Additional members would be relatively easy to install to reinforce these if required by analysis. A preliminary (conservative) check of the L3X3 angles below bridge deck indicate that these angles (acting as secondary beams) are likely being loaded exceeding their allowable strength. Based on this check, these angles appear structurally insufficient for this loading and should not remain in service as currently configured. Conclusions and Recommendations The following conclusions are offered based on our assessment: 1. The bridge abutments cannot be fully evaluated or assessed in their current state and cannot be verified as adequate structural elements in this bridge without additional expense. SCI Project 24-111 Hole 7 Bridge Assessment Report 8 March 2024 Page 6 2. Bridge girder bearings, where visible, are substantially damaged by corrosion due to contact with soil and debris. It is likely that conditions at all bearings are similarly damaged or degraded. 3. Bridge deck, secondary members supporting the deck, and handrails are structurally insufficient in current configuration for the pedestrian and light vehicle loads that are likely to be applied or that are required by code. These insufficiencies present a safety hazard to the users of the bridge that should be addressed as soon as possible. Based on these conclusions, we recommend to remove the bridge from service and restrict user access until structural repairs, strengthening, and/or replacement components can be installed. Alternatively, temporary restriction of traffic across the bridge, pending installation of structural shoring may be possible. This may allow for limited restoration of traffic on the bridge after shoring is installed; it is possible that the required shoring may be significant or impractical to install. Determination of shoring specifics and locations is beyond the scope of this report but should include: girders at/near abutments and at girder midspans, additional supports below deck plates and at deck support angles (secondary members). SCI can provide guidance for temporary shoring under a separate scope of work, if desired. If the Town intends to maintain this crossing location over the long term, SCI recommends removal of the existing bridge and abutments, to be replaced with a new pedestrian bridge and appropriate concrete abutments in a similar configuration. SCI can provide guidance and options for design and/or construction of a new bridge under a separate scope of work, if desired. This report is based on information provided by Town of Oro Valley and there is no claim, either stated or implied, that all conditions were observed. If the contractor or owner identifies other areas of concern on the bridge or site, our office should be contacted for further evaluation. I hope this report is responsive to your needs. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Structural Concepts Inc., Written by, Keegan Battraw Structural Designer SCI Project 24-111 Hole 7 Bridge Assessment Report 8 March 2024 Page 7 Reviewed by, Manuel Naves, PE, SE Structural Engineer Attached: SCI Project # 24-111 Photographic Report 3/08/24 Phone (520) 721-2324 Fax (520) 885-3507 8230 E. Broadway, Suite W-7, Tucson, Arizona 85710 Pusch Ridge Gold Course Hole 7 Bridge Assessment Photographic Report 8 March 2024 SCI Project No. 24-111 Photo 1 – Eastern Approach to Bridge Photo 2 - Western Approach to Bridge SCI Project 24-111 Hole 7 Bridge Photographic Report 8 March 2024 Page 2 Photo 3 – North Girder at East Abutment Photo 4 – Typical Deck Brace at Handrail Post (Above) SCI Project 24-111 Hole 7 Bridge Photographic Report 8 March 2024 Page 3 Photo 5 – East Abutment and Underside of Bridge Deck Photo 6 – Typical Girder Attachment to Central Pier SCI Project 24-111 Hole 7 Bridge Photographic Report 8 March 2024 Page 4 Photo 7 – South Girder Bearing Location at West Abutment Photo 8 – North Girder Bearing Location at East Abutment SCI Project 24-111 Hole 7 Bridge Photographic Report 8 March 2024 Page 5 Photo 9 – North Girder Bearing Location at West Abutment Photo 10 – West Abutment and Underside of Bridge Deck SCI Project 24-111 Hole 7 Bridge Photographic Report 8 March 2024 Page 6 Photo 11 - North Girder and Deck at Western Span Photo 12 – West Abutment, North Face at Girder Bearing SCI Project 24-111 Hole 7 Bridge Photographic Report 8 March 2024 Page 7 Photo 13 – Central Pier and Foundation Photo 14 – Western Approach Concrete Damage SCI Project 24-111 Hole 7 Bridge Photographic Report 8 March 2024 Page 8 Photo 15 – Eastern Approach Slab Photo 16 - Western Approach Slab PUSCH 9 GOLF HOLE #7 GOLF PATH BRIDGE CLOSURE AND FUNDING REQUEST FOR ALTERNATIVE GOLF PATH March 20, 2024 1 Pusch 9 – Hole #7 Hole #7 Tee plays over an existing unnamed wash to the Hole#7 Green. Essentially no Fairway. The Tee is connected to the Green via a golf path that includes a 40ft bridge over said wash. This bridge has been closed due to structural deficiencies. Pusch 9 – Hole #7 Staff is requesting $242,000 to: Build an alternative at grade paved golf path through the existing wash to provide a route around the closed bridge. ($112,000) Replace the existing 40 -year-old irrigation main that aligns with the proposed new path. ($65,000) Demolish the existing bridge and a portion of existing connecting path. ($65,000 – final cost confirmation) Funding to be sourced from General Fund Reserves. Questions    Town Council Regular Session 1. Meeting Date:03/20/2024   Requested by: Rosalyn Epting Submitted By:Rosalyn Epting, Parks and Recreation Department:Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: *DISCUSSION REGARDING THE VISTOSO TRAILS NATURE PRESERVE MASTER PLAN AND SURVEYS, AND PRIORITIZATION OF IMPROVEMENTS RECOMMENDATION: There is no recommendation as this is a Study Session item. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: George Radnovich, Sites Southwest LLC consultant, will provide a presentation regarding the Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve Master Plan changes to-date, as well as the results from the most recent surveys. Mr. Radnovich will be seeking Town Council feedback in order to finalize the Master Plan, as well as prioritize improvements. Once finalized, the intent is to present the Final Master Plan at the April 17, 2024, Town Council Meeting.  BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: The Town of Oro Valley acquired Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve in July 2022. In that same month, the Town published a Request for Proposals for master planning services of the approximate 202-acre property. As a result, Sites Southwest LLC was selected to lead the project in September 2022. Since being selected, Sites Southwest has done extensive community engagement, research, and data collection in the development of the Master Plan. Since the start of the master planning process, the Master Plan has been updated to account for the feedback that has been received. One notable change is that the number of proposed additional trails, outside the existing cart path, have been reduced and limited. The phasing and cost estimates have also been adjusted. Additionally, included are water conscious efforts in the pond area and addressing overall user safety with signage.   In January 2024, a survey was sent to the Friends of Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve asking about prioritization for potential amenities previously presented publicly. In February 2024, a more general survey was made available to the entire community. Priorities of those surveys are listed below. The top 4 priorities for the Friends of Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve Survey were:  Cart Path Repairs1. Re-Envision/Redesign the Pond2. Reseed and Revegetate Landscapes3. Reseed and Revegetate Fairways, Greens, and Tees4. The top 4 priorities for the Community Wide Survey were:  Reseed and Revegetate Landscapes1. Reseed and Revegetate Fairways, Greens, and Tees2. Restroom Work3. Cart Path Reconstruction and Pond Reconstruction4. During tonight's Study Session, the Consultant will present Town Council with the results of both surveys noted above, as well as changes made to the Master Plan. With the recent Town Council allocation of $2,000,000 for above, as well as changes made to the Master Plan. With the recent Town Council allocation of $2,000,000 for Fiscal Year 2024/25, Town Council will be asked to form a consensus regarding specific improvements for the pond area, as well as prioritize revegetation areas and other improvements. Pond options that will be presented include:  Filling in the pond area and planting scenic desert landscape. Rebuilding the pond, similar to how it existed in the past. Use of the area as previously noted in the Master Plan for wildlife drinkers, wildlife viewing areas, trails, etc. Regarding reseeding and revegetation, Council will be asked to rank the following locations for direction on future projects:  Driving Range Fairways, Greens, and Tees of holes 1-18. Council will also be asked to give direction on which hole to start on, since this reseeding and revegetation project will likely need to be phased in. All other areas not covered by the driving range or fairways, greens, and tees of holes 1-18. Other amenities Town Council will be asked to rank are the improvements listed below, based on grants or fundraising that may be available:  ADA Trails Pollinator Garden Outdoor Classroom Education Gardens & Trail STEM Trail After the March 20 Study Session, the consultant will update the Master Plan with feedback received from Town Council. The intent is to present a finalized Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve Master Plan at the April 17, 2024, Council Meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no current fiscal impact, but the Master Plan details projects that would have a future fiscal impact, if funded and implemented. SUGGESTED MOTION: There is not a suggested motion as this is a Study Session Item. Attachments Consultant Report  Presentation  VISTOSO TRAILS NATURE PRESERVE Town Council Update Council Study Session March 20, 2024 PREPARED BY: i»Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve Town Council Update 1. MASTER PLAN UPDATE 2. SURVEYS 2024 3. COSTS AND PHASING Contents ii»Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve Town Council Update Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve, Synopsis of Report Information Enclosed in this report is a Master Plan Update, a summary of the survey results conducted this year, and costs and possible phasing as they now stand. It should be noted that these items will be discussed at the Town Council Study Session on March 20, 2024, and the direction of the Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve should be determined at that time.   Master Plan Update – The Master Plan Update illustrates the Master Plan as it was submitted to the Town of Oro Valley in May of 2023; then followed by a more recent version updated again in the fall and early winter of 2023/2024. As can be seen in the graphics and the accompanying outline of Preserve features, the Master Plan was greatly simplified in the most recent version. The most recent version of the Master Plan was updated prior to the surveys. Surveys – The surveys conducted in January and February of 2024 were released to three groups: the Friends of Preserve Vistoso, then to the greater community of Oro Valley, and then to the Oro Valley Parks and Recreation Advisory Board (PRAB). This was not a scientific survey; however, it does point out some interesting dynamics surrounding the Preserve. Additionally, the Communitywide and Friends responses were answered by upwards of 400 people in each survey, while the PRAB is made up of a board of 7 members. The responses to the surveys did show some notable choices among citizens. Native Seeding, and Landscape of the Preserve’s interstitial areas (outside of the old golf course proper), and the Revegetation of the Fairways, Greens and Tees were highly favored in all three groups. The Cart Path work was in the top five of all groups surveyed as well. Also, the Pond and Bulkhead improvements showed up approvingly in both the Friends and Communitywide survey; however not in the PRAB survey. Another subject worth noting is that while the Cart Path showed up favorably in both the Friends of Vistoso and Communitywide surveys, neither group was willing to fund it through donations, which infers that they think that is something that the Town should take care of for health and safety, they would rather donate their monies to the landscaping strategies. Another interesting point worth mentioning is that the PRAB rated the Cart Path as their number one choice and other Preserve useability functions like the restrooms, signage, and ADA Trails highly. Costs and Phasing – We have included in this package the most updated and recent cost estimates for the project. It has been reviewed by the Oro Valley Town Engineer, and the staff at the Town Parks and Recreation Department and staff at Sites Southwest. It has also been updated with estimates provided from recent Oro Valley bids. The Cost Estimates should be viewed as an appropriate appraisal of the costs of implementation for a master plan level estimate. However, the Phasing should be viewed as a “DRAFT” in that it has not been truly vetted by the Mayor and Councilors, or staff, post survey. We have kept the Safety Improvements as the recommended first phase in this assessment only because it exposes the Town to some liability if not done, however we are aware that the Council recently appropriated monies towards the Pond Improvements including the Bulkhead removal and refurbishment and the other improvements to make it a destination again. The Town will have to decide, with assistance from technical staff for both the Town and Sites Southwest, what phasing would be in the overall best interests of Oro Valley.   1»Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve Town Council Update 1. Master Plan Update SCALE = 1” = 600’ 0 600’1.200’ ILLUSTRATIVE MASTER PLAN FormerDrivingRange Former Pond FormerMaintenanceYard Existing Cart Path Tee Boxes Fairways / Driving Range Putting Greens Undisturbed Desert Sand Traps Proposed Wildlife Drinkers Proposed Rest Areas Proposed Trailhead Parking Proposed Shared Use-Weekends Only Existing Restrooms LEGEND a. Early Master Plan »System of walking/biking trails »Areas for wildlife viewing »Connect Vistoso trails to Community Trail System »Provide dispersed parking areas »Provide directional signage »Repurpose former pond for habitat, education wildlife viewing »Provide area for family gatherings at former pond »Repurpose driving range to include educational gardens »Provide educational opportunities (K to 6) »Provide interpretive opportunities such as dark sky viewing »Address wash areas erosion for safety »Create natural water features for habitat »Reestablish native vegetation throughout Preserve »Provide shade and seating areas »Develop operations and management protocols 2»Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve Town Council Update b. Current Master Plan »Existing Cart Path becomes Preserve trail (with modi ications) »ADA – New Regulations »Staged revegetation strategy »Four parking lots, one shared use parking lot »Shade structures »Wildlife viewing structures »Pond node »Driving range node »Two outdoor classrooms »Wildlife drinkers »Archeology Southwest Feedback included 3»Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve Town Council Update 2. Surveys 2024 a. Friends of Preserve Vistoso Survey - Elements Rankings 1 Cart Path Repairs 2 Re-Envision / Redesign Pond 3 Reseed and Revegetate Interstitial Landscapes 4 Reseed and Revegetate Fairways, Tees, and Greens 5 Other Work 4»Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve Town Council Update Survey - Fundraising and Donations 1 40% Willing to Donate / 60% Not Willing to Donate 2 Donation Amounts: Between $100.00 to $500.00 With reservations 3 Donation Amounts: Some as high as $25,000.00 4 Donations by Project Elements: 2/6/24, 4:22 PM Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve Draft Master Plan Projects – Prioritization Survey https://survey123.arcgis.com/surveys/005664a95c634298ac96d41116aa83a7/analyze?position=0.below_is_a_list_of_projects_ple 2/24 Answered: 422 Skipped: 0 Are you willing to fundraise/contribute? Answered: 422 Skipped: 0 No Yes No 253 59.95% Yes 169 40.05% Which project would you be willing to donate to? Answers Count Percentage First: pond bulkhead, all projects, native seeding and revegetation, cart path Second: native seeding, revegetation, waterfall/pond, pollinator garden, education garden Third: pollinator garden, waterfall/pond, cart path, native seeding, revegetation Fourth: all projects, native seeding, ped traffic control (stone canyon), pond bulkhead, revegetation Fifth: pollinator garden 5»Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve Town Council Update Survey - Elements Ranking vs Donations 1 Cart Path Repairs 2 Re-Envision / Redesign Pond 3 Reseed and Revegetate Interstitial Landscapes 4 Reseed and Revegetate Fairways, Tees, and Greens 2/6/24, 4:22 PM Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve Draft Master Plan Projects – Prioritization Survey https://survey123.arcgis.com/surveys/005664a95c634298ac96d41116aa83a7/analyze?position=0.below_is_a_list_of_projects_ple 3/24 0 20 40 60 All ProjectsADA TrailCart Path Work...Education Gard...Native Seeding...Outdoor Classr...Pedestrian Tra...Pollinator Gar...Pond - Bulkhea...Restroom #1 Re...Revegetation a...Signage - Wayf...Site Furnishin...STEM TrailTrailhead Park...Waterfall Reco...Wildlife Blind...All Projects 47 11.14% ADA Trail 2 0.47% Cart Path Work - Removals, Rebuilds, Shoulder Improvement s, Repairs, Drainage 13 3.08% Education Gardens & Trail 0 0% Native Seeding & Landscape Plantings 14 3.32% Outdoor Classroom 1 0.24% Pedestrian Traffic Control to Stone Canyon Gatehouse 0 0% Pollinator Garden 4 0.95% Pond - Bulkhead Removal/Demolition, Reconstruction & Infras tructure 53 12.56% Restroom #1 Repair (restroom closest to where driving range existed) 2 0.47% Revegetation and Reclamation of Fairways, Greens & Tees 1- 18 15 3.55% Answers Count Percentage 5 Other Work 6»Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve Town Council Update Survey - Priorities for Donations 7»Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve Town Council Update b. Communitywide Survey Survey - Elements Rankings 1 Vistoso Trails Visits – 82% have visited / 15% have not 2 Native Seeding and Landscape 3 Pond and Bulkhead 4 Restroom Cart Path Reconstruction 8»Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve Town Council Update c. Parks and Recreation Board Survey (PRAB) 9»Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve Town Council Update Top 5: Friends of Preserve Vistoso 1.Cart Path Work 2.Pond and Bulkhead 3.Native Seeding and Landscape – Interstitial Areas 4.Revegetation and Reclamation of Fairways, Greens and Tees 5.Restroom Top 5: Communitywide 1.Native Seeding and Landscape 2.Pond and Bulkhead 3.Restroom 4.Cart Path Work 5.Revegetation and Reclamation of Fairways, Greens and Tees Top 5: PRAB 1.Cart Path Work 2.Restroom 3.Signage and Wayfinding 4.ADA Trails 5.Native Seeding and Landscape 10»Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve Town Council Update 3. Costs and Phasing ITEM #ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY UNIT COST Total Notes Phase I ‐ Safety Improvements  1 Mobilization/Demobilization LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Allowance 2 Construction Staking LS 1 $7,600.00 $7,600.00 Based on  $1,700/AC 3 Selective Clearing, Pruning & Plant Relocation AC 2.9 $7,500.00 $21,750.00 Based on area 4 Pond Bulkhead Removal / Demolition LF 1,500.00               $15.00 $22,500.00 Based on linear footage  5 Cart Path Removals: broken, heaved, and heavily cracked LS 21 $420.00 $8,820.00 Adjusted at .75 of Build Cost 6 Cart Path Rebuilds: rebuild cart path in removal areas LS 21 $1,650.00 $34,650.00 Assuming 8'x16' ea @ $12/sf x 21 fixes = $1,536 ea 7 Native Seeding: disturbed pond areas only SF 126,000.00          $0.62 $78,120.00 based on $0.62/sf 8 Safety Signage: share the path, cautionary, and yield signage LS 1 $2,700.00 $2,700.00 Based on $75.00 per sign  9 SWPP Plan Preparation, Installation, and Maintenance LS 1 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 Based on $1,000/AC 10 Earthwork ‐ Unclassified Excavation, Including Placement and Compaction CY 4670 $40.00 $186,800.00 Based on area not cubic yardage Subtotal $379,940.00 Phase I Soft Costs Adjusted Construction Contingency @ 10%$38,034.00 Design Fee @ 15%$57,051.00 Design Contingency @ 5%$19,017.00 Permits & Fees $0.00 General Liability @ 1%$3,803.40 Builders Risk @ 0.7%$2,662.38 Bond @ 1%$3,803.40 Fee @ 6%$22,820.40 Tax @ 6.565% $24,969.32  TOTAL $552,100.90 ITEM #ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY UNIT COST Total Notes Phase II ‐ Infrastructure 1 Mobilization/Demobilization LS 1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 Allowance 2 Construction Staking LS 1 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 Based on $1,700/AC 3 Selective Clearing, Pruning & Plant Relocation LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Allowance  4 Demolition LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Allowance 5 Signage: Wayfinding, Directional, Interpretive/Educational LS 1 $280,000.00 $280,000.00 Based on $75 per sign 6 Earthwork ‐ Unclassified Excavation, Including Placement and Compaction LS 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 Allowance  7 Trailhead Parking at N Rancho Vistoso Blvd. (15 Spaces)Space 15 $5,000.00 $75,000.00 Based on CRC costs ‐ per space $5000 8 ADA Trailhead Parking at W Vistoso Highlands Dr. ( 4 Spaces)Space 8 $5,000.00 $40,000.00 Based on CRC costs ‐ per space $5000 9 Trailhead Parking at W Vistoso Highlands Dr. (31 Spaces)Space 31 $5,000.00 $155,000.00 Based on CRC costs ‐ per space $5000 10 Cart Path Shoulder Improvements (4'‐0" Wide One Side)SF 131,000 $3.00 $393,000.00 Allowance 11 Cart Path Repairs and Drainage Improvements LS 1 $75,000.00 $75,000.00 Based on Phase 1 cost, increased by 50% 12 Site Furnishing , (Benches, Bollards, Trash Receptacles)LS 1 $90,000.00 $90,000.00 Allowance 13 Native Seeding LS 1 $77,500.00 $77,500.00 Based on $0.62/sf from NTP 14 SWPP Plan Preparation, Installation, and Maintenance LS 1 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 Based on $1000/AC 15 Material Testing & Inspections LS 1 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 Allowance Subtotal $1,345,500.00 Phase II Soft Costs Adjusted Construction Contingency @ 10%Demolition Design Fee @ 15%$201,075.00 Design Contingency @ 5%$67,025.00 Permits & Fees $0.00 General Liability @ 1%$13,405.00 Builders Risk @ 0.7%$9,383.50 Bond @ 1%$13,405.00 Fee @ 6%$80,430.00 Tax @ 6.565% $88,003.83  TOTAL $1,818,227.33 ITEM #ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY UNIT COST Total Notes 1 LS 1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 Allowance 2 LS 1 $16,300.00 $16,300.00 Based on $1,700/AC 3 LS 1 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 Allowance  4 LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 Allowance 5 LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Based on $1,000/AC 6 LS 1 $60,000.00 $60,000.00 Allowance 7 LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Allowance 8 LS 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 Allowance 9 SF 126,000 $0.62 $78,120.00 Based on $0.62/SF 10 LS 1 $150,000.00 $150,000.00 Allowance 11 LS 1 $225,000.00 $225,000.00 Allowance 12 EA 8 $40,000.00 $320,000.00 Allowance 13 EA 3 $7,000.00 $21,000.00 Allowance 14 Phase lll Water Feature Improvements & Infrastructure Mobilization/Demobilization Construction Staking Selective Clearing, Pruning & Plant Relocation Demolition  SWPP Plan Preparation, Installation, and Maintenance Earthwork ‐ Unclassified Excavation, Including Placement and Compaction Material Testing & Inspections Landscape Plantings Native Seeding Waterfall Reconstruction & Infrastructure Pond Reconstruction & Infrastructure Wildlife Blinds and Shade Structures  Wildlife Drinkers  Directional, Safety & Educational Signage LS 1 $60,000.00 $60,000.00 Based on $75.00 per Sign Subtotal $1,032,920.00 Phase lll Soft Costs Adjusted Construction Contingency @ 10%$103,662.00 Design Fee @ 15%$155,493.00 Design Contingency @ 20%$207,324.00 Permits & Fees $0.00 General Liability @ 1%$10,366.20 Builders Risk @ 0.7%$7,256.34 Bond @ 1%$10,366.20 Fee @ 6%$62,197.20 Tax @ 6.565% $68,054.10  TOTAL $1,657,639.04 ITEM #ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY UNIT COST Total Notes Phase IV ‐ Driving Range Improvements 1 Mobilization/Demobilization LS 1 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 Allowance 2 Construction Staking LS 1 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 Based on $1,700/AC 3 Selective Clearing, Pruning & Plant Relocation LS 1 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 Allowance 4 SWPP Plan Preparation, Installation, and Maintenance LS 1 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 Based on $1,000/AC 5 Earthwork ‐ Unclassified Excavation, Including Placement and Compaction LS 1 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 Allowance 7 Material Testing & Inspections LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Allowance 8 Pollinator Garden LS 1 $35,000.00 $35,000.00 Allowance 9 Outdoor Classroom LS 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 Allowance 9 ADA Trail (5'‐0" Wide Compacted Fines)SF 12,650 $5.38 $68,057.00 Based on area 10 Educational Gardens & Trail LS 1 $175,000.00 $175,000.00 Allowance 11 STEM Trail LS 1 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 Allowance 12 Directional, Safety & Educational Signage LS 1 $400,000.00 $400,000.00 Based on $75/sign 13 Native Seeding SF 435,600 $0.62 $270,072.00 Based on $0.62/SF Subtotal $1,233,129.00 Phase IV Soft Costs Adjusted Construction Contingency @ 10%$121,812.90 Design Fee @ 15%$182,719.35 Design Contingency @ 20%$243,625.80 Permits & Fees $0.00 General Liability @ 1%$12,181.29 Builders Risk @ 0.7%$8,526.90 Bond @ 1%$12,181.29 Fee @ 6%$73,087.74 Tax @ 6.565%$79,970.17 TOTAL $1,967,234.44 ITEM #ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY UNIT COST Total Notes Hole Phase V ‐ Revegetation and Reclamation of Fairways, Greens and Tees 1 Tees, Fairway, Greens AC 69.50 $38,800.00 $2,696,600.00 2 Construction Staking LS 1 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 Based on $1,700/AC 2 Clear & Grub Old Sod, Disposal Fees AC 34.75 $4,356.00 $151,371.00 Based on $0.10/SF Estimate 3 Dust Control AC 69.50 $1,200.00 $83,400.00 Allowance Subtotal $2,961,371.00 Phase V Soft Costs Adjusted Construction Contingency @ 10%$293,137.10 Design Fee @ 5%$146,568.55 Design Contingency @ 5%$146,568.55 Permits & Fees $0.00 General Liability @ 1%$29,313.71 Builders Risk @ 0.7%$20,519.60 Bond @ 1%$29,313.71 Fee @ 6%$175,882.26 Tax @ 6.565%$192,444.51 TOTAL $3,995,118.99 Allowance ‐ (Rip, Seed, Straw & Compact) Based on Hydroseed @ $0.62/SF 11»Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve Town Council Update ITEM #ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY UNIT COST Total NotesPhase I ‐ Safety Improvements1 Mobilization/Demobilization LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Allowance2 Construction Staking LS 1 $7,600.00 $7,600.00 Based on $1,700/AC3 Selective Clearing, Pruning & Plant Relocation AC 2.9 $7,500.00 $21,750.00 Based on area4 Pond Bulkhead Removal / Demolition LF 1,500.00 $15.00 $22,500.00 Based on linear footage5 Cart Path Removals: broken, heaved, and heavily cracked LS 21 $420.00 $8,820.00 Adjusted at .75 of Build Cost6 Cart Path Rebuilds: rebuild cart path in removal areas LS 21 $1,650.00 $34,650.00 Assuming 8'x16' ea @ $12/sf x 21 fixes = $1,536 ea7 Native Seeding: disturbed pond areas only SF 126,000.00 $0.62 $78,120.00 based on $0.62/sf8 Safety Signage: share the path, cautionary, and yield signage LS 1 $2,700.00 $2,700.00 Based on $75.00 per sign9 SWPP Plan Preparation, Installation, and Maintenance LS 1 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 Based on $1,000/AC10 Earthwork ‐ Unclassified Excavation, Including Placement and Compaction CY 4670 $40.00 $186,800.00 Based on area not cubic yardageSubtotal $379,940.00Phase I Soft Costs AdjustedConstruction Contingency @ 10%$38,034.00Design Fee @ 15%$57,051.00Design Contingency @ 5%$19,017.00Permits & Fees $0.00General Liability @ 1%$3,803.40Builders Risk @ 0.7%$2,662.38Bond @ 1%$3,803.40Fee @ 6%$22,820.40Tax @ 6.565%$24,969.32TOTAL $552,100.90ITEM #ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY UNIT COST Total NotesPhase II ‐ Infrastructure1 Mobilization/Demobilization LS 1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 Allowance2 Construction Staking LS 1 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 Based on $1,700/AC3 Selective Clearing, Pruning & Plant Relocation LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Allowance4 Demolition LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Allowance5 Signage: Wayfinding, Directional, Interpretive/Educational LS 1 $280,000.00 $280,000.00 Based on $75 per sign6 Earthwork ‐ Unclassified Excavation, Including Placement and Compaction LS 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 Allowance7 Trailhead Parking at N Rancho Vistoso Blvd. (15 Spaces)Space 15 $5,000.00 $75,000.00 Based on CRC costs ‐ per space $50008 ADA Trailhead Parking at W Vistoso Highlands Dr. ( 4 Spaces)Space 8 $5,000.00 $40,000.00 Based on CRC costs ‐ per space $50009Trailhead Parking at W Vistoso Highlands Dr. (31 Spaces)Space 31 $5,000.00 $155,000.00 Based on CRC costs ‐ per space $500010 Cart Path Shoulder Improvements (4'‐0" Wide One Side)SF 131,000 $3.00 $393,000.00 Allowance11 Cart Path Repairs and Drainage Improvements LS 1 $75,000.00 $75,000.00 Based on Phase 1 cost, increased by 50%12 Site Furnishing , (Benches, Bollards, Trash Receptacles)LS 1 $90,000.00 $90,000.00 Allowance13 Native Seeding LS 1 $77,500.00 $77,500.00 Based on $0.62/sf from NTP14 SWPP Plan Preparation, Installation, and Maintenance LS 1 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 Based on $1000/AC15 Material Testing & Inspections LS 1 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 AllowanceSubtotal $1,345,500.00Phase II Soft Costs AdjustedConstruction Contingency @ 10%DemolitionDesign Fee @ 15%$201,075.00Design Contingency @ 5%$67,025.00Permits & Fees $0.00General Liability @ 1%$13,405.00Builders Risk @ 0.7%$9,383.50Bond @ 1%$13,405.00Fee @ 6%$80,430.00Tax @ 6.565%$88,003.83TOTAL $1,818,227.33ITEM #ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY UNIT COST Total NotesPhase lll Pond Reconstruction & Infrastructure1 Mobilization/Demobilization LS 1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 Allowance2 Construction Staking LS 1 $16,300.00 $16,300.00 Based on $1,700/AC3 Selective Clearing, Pruning & Plant Relocation LS 1 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 Allowance4 Demolition LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 Allowance5 SWPP Plan Preparation, Installation, and Maintenance LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Based on $1,000/AC6 Earthwork ‐ Unclassified Excavation, Including Placement and Compaction LS 1 $60,000.00 $60,000.00 Allowance7 Material Testing & Inspections LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Allowance8 Landscape Plantings LS 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 Allowance9 Native Seeding SF 126,000 $0.62 $78,120.00 Based on $0.62/SF10 Waterfall Reconstruction & Infrastructure LS 1 $150,000.00 $150,000.00 Allowance11 Pond Reconstruction & Infrastructure LS 1 $225,000.00 $225,000.00 Allowance12 Wildlife Blinds and Shade Structures EA 8 $40,000.00 $320,000.00 Allowance12 Wildlife Drinkers EA 3 $7,000.00 $21,000.00 Allowance13 Directional, Safety & Educational Signage LS 1 $60,000.00 $60,000.00 Based on $75.00 per SignSubtotal $1,032,920.00 Phase lll Soft Costs Adjusted Construction Contingency @ 10%$103,662.00 Design Fee @ 15%$155,493.00 Design Contingency @ 20%$207,324.00 Permits & Fees $0.00 General Liability @ 1%$10,366.20 Builders Risk @ 0.7%$7,256.34 Bond @ 1%$10,366.20 Fee @ 6%$62,197.20 Tax @ 6.565%$68,054.10 TOTAL $1,657,639.04 ITEM #ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY UNIT COST Total Notes Phase IV ‐ Driving Range Improvements 1 Mobilization/Demobilization LS 1 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 Allowance 2 Construction Staking LS 1 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 Based on $1,700/AC  3 Selective Clearing, Pruning & Plant Relocation LS 1 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 Allowance  4 SWPP Plan Preparation, Installation, and Maintenance LS 1 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 Based on $1,000/AC 5 Earthwork ‐ Unclassified Excavation, Including Placement and Compaction LS 1 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 Allowance  7 Material Testing & Inspections LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Allowance 8 Pollinator Garden LS 1 $35,000.00 $35,000.00 Allowance 9 Outdoor Classroom LS 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 Allowance 10 ADA Trail (5'‐0" Wide Compacted Fines)SF 12,650 $5.38 $68,057.00 Based on area 11 Educational Gardens & Trail LS 1 $175,000.00 $175,000.00 Allowance 12 STEM Trail LS 1 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 Allowance 13 Directional, Safety & Educational Signage LS 1 $400,000.00 $400,000.00 Based on $75/sign 14 Native Seeding SF 435,600 $0.62 $270,072.00 Based on $0.62/SF Subtotal $1,233,129.00 Phase IV Soft Costs Adjusted Construction Contingency @ 10%$121,812.90 Design Fee @ 15%$182,719.35 Design Contingency @ 20%$243,625.80 Permits & Fees $0.00 General Liability @ 1%$12,181.29 Builders Risk @ 0.7%$8,526.90 Bond @ 1%$12,181.29 Fee @ 6%$73,087.74 Tax @ 6.565% $79,970.17  TOTAL $1,967,234.44 ITEM #ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY UNIT COST Total Notes Phase V ‐ Revegetation and Reclamation of Fairways, Greens and Tees 1 Tees, Fairway, Greens AC 69.50 $38,800.00 $2,696,600.00 2 Construction Staking LS 1 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 Based on $1,700/AC  3 Clear & Grub Old Sod, Disposal Fees AC 34.75 $4,356.00 $151,371.00 Based on $0.10/SF Estimate 4 Dust Control AC 69.50 $1,200.00 $83,400.00 Allowance Subtotal $2,961,371.00 Phase V Soft Costs Adjusted Construction Contingency @ 10%$293,137.10 Design Fee @ 5%$146,568.55 Design Contingency @ 5%$146,568.55 Permits & Fees $0.00 General Liability @ 1%$29,313.71 Builders Risk @ 0.7%$20,519.60 Bond @ 1%$29,313.71 Fee @ 6%$175,882.26 Tax @ 6.565% $192,444.51  TOTAL $3,995,118.99 Allowance ‐ (Rip, Seed, Straw & Compact) Based on  Hydroseed @ $0.62/SF 12»Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve Town Council Update Below we have provided potential phases and individual projects which should be considered as part of the Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve redevelopment. Pond Area Beautification 1.Pond as Scenic Landscape Area – Pond bulkheads removed, pond area is filled in with fill dirt, and then landscaped with Desert Landscaping and irrigation (grasses, desert shrubs, Cacti and Desert Plants). $ 321,150.00 (plus permits, taxes, and other soft costs) 2.Pond Rebuild - Pond is rebuilt to its former character with: a.Bulkhead removed and land sloped at 6:1 to new pond edge with new pond liner, and pond is completed with new landscaping. $ 1,700,000.00 (plus permits, taxes, and other soft costs) b.Bulkhead retained, a new pond liner is installed, and pond is completed with landscaping. $ 2,200,000.00 (plus permits, taxes, and other soft costs) 3.Water Feature and Natural Ponds - Pond is built as per the option currently included in the Master Plan $ 1,200,000.00 (plus permits, taxes, and other soft costs) Revegetation 1.Fully Implemented Driving Range – Revegetate the driving range with all of the gardens, trails and other improvements as illustrated in the Current Master Plan. $ 1,500,000.00 (plus permits, taxes, and other soft costs) 2.Driving Range Revegetated – The diving range is fully revegetated with Desert Landscaping and irrigation (grasses, desert shrubs, Cacti and Desert Plants). $ 600,000.00 (plus permits, taxes, and other soft costs) 3.Reseed and Revegetation - All Fairways, Sand Traps, Greens and Tees with Desert Landscaping and irrigation (grasses, desert shrubs, Cacti and Desert Plants). 1.Removal of golf course grasses and full revegetation of the entire old golf course area with Desert Landscaping and Irrigation. $ 3,400,000.00 (plus permits, taxes, and other soft costs) 2.Removal of golf course grasses and full revegetation of Individual holes from the old golf course area with Desert Landscaping and Irrigation. $ 189,000.00 (plus contingency, design, permits, taxes, and other soft costs) Note: all holes (fairways, tees, greens, and sand traps) should be ranked by visibility and importance to the community. We would recommend that holes visible from streets be redeveloped first, followed by interior holes. 13»Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve Town Council Update Other Areas and Amenities Below we offer examples of other smaller projects within the Preserve which could be considered. 1.Signage: interpretive and directional. $ 400,000.00 (plus contingency, design, permits, taxes, and other soft costs) 2.Gardens and Educational Features $ 353,000.00 (plus contingency, design, permits, taxes, and other soft costs) 14»Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve Town Council Update 4. Appendices 15»Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve Town Council Update Cat # Category Is there anything else you would like to share with us? 1 Kudos Thank you for this survey! 1 Kudos I think the path is great 1 Kudos Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve is a great asset to Oro Valley. Thank you to those who had the foresight to convert the golf course and create this wonderful preserve and to those who maintain it now. 1 Kudos Just the biggest thanks It is a miraculous journey to walk with you and our community 1 Kudos Wonderful list. All valuable to some degree. 1 Kudos This is a treasure! I hope the decisions are made thoughtfully and with regard to the input you receive! 1 Kudos Thank you! � 1 Kudos This is an exciting opportunity for the entire town and especially for the residents of Rancho Vistoso. I dont' live there but I am looking forward to visiting with my dog and walking the path periodically. 1 Kudos It is a great place to walk!!! Thanks , Oro Valley! 1 Kudos It’s a beautiful park! I really enjoy walking up there with my dog! 1 Kudos Thanks! 1 Kudos Although I have not visited this area, my husband has and was overjoyed to see such wildlife diversity! He took many photos and shared them with me! 1 Kudos I love walking this great area! It’s a definite plus for Oro Valley residents. 2 Trail and access design Signs near blind spots on the paved trail warning people on bicycles to slow down etc. Need more on and off entrances and exits to the trail for bicycles and pedestrians 2 Trail and access design Create soft pedestrian shoulders to allow runners/walkers who prefer a soft surface to use that. 2 Trail and access design In addition to the cart paths, having natural surface trails for walking and running would be appreciated. I'm starting to see the early beginnings of trails informally created by walkers and runners. As these 'crowd developed natural trails' becomes more delineated it would be good to 'formalize' the path/track into the plan for vegetation and reclamation of fairways, greens and tees for use year round. 2 Trail and access design Bike traffic can be dangerous. Some bikers tear around the cart path and I've been lucky not to have been hit. I don't know if this is an issue for others, but I hate to see tracks of bikes and motorized vehicles making vegetation-less roads/trails across the fairways. 2 Trail and access design Could the current cart path be made into the ADA path and not have a separate path? Also include the preserve in the Adopt-A-Trail program. Make sections of the path and surrounding area available for adoption. Encourage adopters to work with parks and recreation to improve grounds (remove weeds, buffelgrass, etc). Allow residents to donate $$ towards benches, native trees in memory of individuals 2 Trail and access design I'm glad that the paths are open for bicycles, but they often ride too fast and don't warn pedestrians. Is there anything that can be done about that? 2 Trail and access design This property is intended to be a nature preserve. The only work that should be performed is work for safety (paths and at the Stone Canyon entrance), comfort and cleanliness (benches, restroom and trash cans). Other than those, the desert should be allowed to reclaim the property. By definition, preserve means "to keep as is". We don't need nor want the addition of things that are not naturally occurring. 2 Trail and access design Trail should be open during tgr night 2 Trail and access design Cart path improvements should bring path to ADA standards. Provide wide gravel shoulders to ease pedestrian bike wheelchair passings. 2 Trail and access design This trail is a beautiful part of Oro Valley - please do all you can to keep it accessible and improve it as much as feasibly possible. 2 Trail and access design separate pathways for bicycles and pedestrians 2 Trail and access design I find the width of sidewalks in Oro Valley are not wide enough for people to walk two abreast, so I would like to see wider paths. 2 Trail and access design Would be great to have a groomed mountain bike dirt trail. 2 Trail and access design Would love to consider a dirt path trail and an area for bike skills learning. 2 Trail and access design Please keep infrastructure to a minimum and just allow the space to be as natural as possible. We live up against the preserve and are not looking to make the preserve super-busy, and most importantly, we want to preserve and protect the abundant wildlife in the preserve for everyone's enjoyment. 2 Trail and access design I would like access from the communities that back onto the trail. While it is out the back of my house, I would have to drive to get on the paths. Off LaCanada and before the new homes, the hill is too steep for someone not young. 2 Trail and access design The cracks and uneven pavement on the cart paths are a city liability waiting to happen. They should be addressed ASAP 2 Trail and access design How about a dirt trail through the preserve? Or let nature take its course around the preserve to make it a more nature-inspired loop…whether paved or mixed-terrain. Sometimes less is more. Many times less is more. 2 Trail and access design Return it to undeveloped open space and keep it that way as much as possible. 2 Trail and access design As a cyclist, I enjoy Vistoso Trails. My overriding (no pun intended) concern is safety. I appreciate repairs that have been made on the cart path; more are needed. There are several immediate drop-offs along the path that, while, 4 inches at most, could cause real harm to the cyclist who makes a mistake. There are a couple trees overhanging, too. From a community standpoint, I do see liability with the abandoned pond. Broadly, though the preserve is a wonderful place. Like all assets, it needs investment. 2 Trail and access design A multi-purpose path would make it fun and safe for walkers and bikers. Thank you. 2 Trail and access design remove bicycles from paved path. With the undulating path and many downhill 45 degree blind corners, bicycle / pedestrian accidents are going to occur. The legal, damage and injury costs could easily be more than the cost to acquire the preserve. 2 Trail and access design No bike riding 3 Landscape I walk this trail every day and in the summer is has very little shade. Native trees planted would be greatly appreciated! 16»Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve Town Council Update Cat # Category Is there anything else you would like to share with us? 3 Landscape Native seeding and landscape planting should prioritize pollinators. 3 Landscape Maintain the Preserve as natural as possible. 3 Landscape I walk this path daily and I am alarmed at the number of homeowners along the path that have cleared the land behind their homes of all desert plantings. Cutting down trees and even putting in plantings that are not native. I hope they will be stopped. The property is not theirs to do with what they want. 3 Landscape there are simple, cost efficient techniques that could be deployed to eradicate the evasive species and noxious plant material taking over the Vistoso Preserve. This work effort could then be used to mitigate the pond are on Vistoso Highlands Drive. The money spent on master planning the site may have been enough to complete both of these tasks. 3 Landscape The pond should not be restored as a pond but regraded and appropriately planted to mirror the Sonoran Desert plant palette. Revegetation and reclamation should include removal of buffelgrass and other invasive plants. 3 Landscape The area around the ninth hole should be returned to its original beauty. 3 Landscape The more it can return to a natural state, the better. Improvements should be aimed at preventing at preventing deterioration 3 Landscape Large swaths of Lupines and California Poppies would look spectacular on the fairways and greens and tees, and not be expensive and would reseed themselves each year. 3 Landscape Please make it look like natural desert, not a dead golf course! 3 Landscape Some homeowners have cleared the land behind their house which appears to be preserve property. Looks non nature. 3 Landscape Remove buffelgrass. Let me know. I will help. 4 Water use We live in the desert! Anything to do with providing a manmade water-based habitat is ridiculous. The water tables are dropping. At Steam Pump Ranch we have gone from George Pusch being able to hand dig a well around 1880, to now having to drill down to 237 feet before striking water for a recent Town well. 4 Water use Evolve pond towards cienaga or leave dry; do not go for high-water-needs like waterfall. 4 Water use If possible, to use reclaimed water to refill the pond and waterfall that would be a wonderful bonus. 4 Water use We need the pond refilled, it is an eye sore as it exists. With the wild life I see, water is needed for their existence, along with a need for a grass area around the pond. The big trees, also need a water supply, they have suffered greatly from the drought and lack of water. 4 Water Use Oro Valley is beautiful, but feels very dry. Any type of water feature, but especially a pond ( or small lake) would make it an amazing place! 5 Environmental and cultural education Since the preserve contains the Sleeping Snake Hohokam site it provides the opportunity to educate the public to the value of the area. Archaeology Southwest has thought about providing educational signage due to fact that trails to the petroglyphs already exist. It is extremely important that value is placed on this site to discourage vandals. Above all, this prehistoric treasure needs to be respected and protected. 5 Environmental and cultural education Be minimalist about educational signage - big signs weather badly, get damaged, go out of date as wildlife changes; brochures keyed to simply numbered locations can be updated, offer space to praise donors; do label major trees and shrubs. 6 Wayfinding Need signage re: dogs must be on leash; pick up after your dog; speed limit for bikes, no motorized vehicles. 6 Wayfinding Signs should be kept to a minimum. Strategically located kiosks with a map of the trail system and a "You Are Here" locater on the map should help most people orient themselves and help guide them through the property. The path system is not complicated to justify littering the property with wayfinding signs. 6 Wayfinding better signage with distances to return or continue on a trail. it was confusing and misdirected. better signage mid trail and along trail. More signs with *you are here* on an overall map view along trails. I couldn't figure out if I should just keep moving forward or turn around and head back, especially when feeling heat exhausted because of the rare shade trees or structures. 7 Parking A fifth choice would be parking because the main lot off of Vistoso Highlands will be going away, but I'm sure you're already working on a plan for that. 7 Parking The # 1 improvement in the near term is adequate parking for OV residents and visitors who do not live near the park. Once done this will expand the awareness and enjoyment to more town residents. 7 Parking I would rank parking access possibly the highest as the apartments are built and existing parking is reduced. 7 Parking Trailhead Parking will be needed beyond what is being proposed at N Rancho Vistoso Blvd & Vistoso Highlands Dr. An 8 to 12 car parking trailhead will be completely inadequate at this site and will result in people parking where they are not supposed to if other options are not provided. The Linda Vista Trailhead is completely inadequate as an example of too little parking and VTNP will be the same if not worse over time. 7 Parking I also couldn't figure out if there was 1 or 2 trailhead parking lots. 2 would be ideal for different entry points-so I wouldn't have to hike from the same spot if was only one trail start from the parking lot. 8 Recreational activities To have walking groups for women or men scheduled for set time and days during the week. 9 Funding Whatever the projects they should be funded and maintained on a user fee basis. 9 Funding We are new to Oro Valley, having recently purchased a home here. We are, unfortunately not yet familiar with Vistoso Preserve :Nature Trails, but we strongly support more protection of our natural areas and of trails and other additions which help folks learn to appreciatd nature. We are voters for funding of these types of projects. 9 Funding Someone should be applying for every available grant to help fund these projects. The Conservation Authority initially told us that these were available and in abundant supply. Please contact them for guidance. 9 Funding If you can spend $25+ million on golf, you can spend serious money to bring this property back to a proper condition. 10 Motorized vehicles Also need clarification, if I can use an elect bike on the trail 17»Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve Town Council Update Cat # Category Is there anything else you would like to share with us? 10 Motorized vehicles I think it is advisable to keep e-bikes off the cart path due to foot traffic. With so many blind curves and increased bike speeds of e bikes, I have seen and personally experienced many close calls of bikes nearly running into walkers. 11 Other amenities I would like renovation of more restrooms along the paved path 11 Other amenities Consider use of old driving range for public recreational use: astronomy nights, putting green, Frisbee golf, pickleball, etc. 11 Other amenities Would love natural park build ins for kids. Like the stone and log play structure at Naranja Park. 11 Other amenities I would like to see the sport of Geocaching made available in the preserve. It is a low-impact activity that draws people of all ages. Just look at how popular Geocaching is in Catalina State Park and you will see it's a valuable addition to your plan. 11 Other amenities Keep it a place of silence and reflection! 11 Other amenities There should be regular, dog-friendly shuttle service with stops both Fry’s shopping plazas and at the Safeway plaza 11 Other amenities Gotta have a functioning ADA-friendly bathroom. 11 Other amenities The # 2 improvement is to fix the lake [either replenish or turn into a grassed central area], which is an eyesore to nearby neighborhoods, and the 1st thing people see when visiting. Not something that will draw tourists to visit a second time. 11 Other amenities We took many family photos in front of the pond in years past and this would encourage wildlife as well. This is a true gem in OV! 11 Other amenities Opening bathrooms around the entire trail pathway needs to be priority to allow walkers and bikers to enjoy the facility. 11 Other amenities Restrooms are needed, but I think portables, strategically placed midway on the trails would work. No need to spend a lotta money, installing permanent restrooms. 11 Other amenities How about opening a coffee shop in t he structure near the driving range? Or consider offering electric scooter rentals 11 Other amenities more stopping rest structures, benches, some with and without shade. 12 Other amenities How about making some of this area a disc golf course. There is a seasonal disc golf course at el conquistador and the residents love it watch people play. You can make it a pay to play and that money can go towards maintaining the property. 12 Other concerns I never supported thus change. The golf course was #4 in the State back in the day. It's sad and unforgivable what you have done. It's a black eye on the Town. Taking my property to build a mup on La Canada is also a low point. It's my 23rd year in OV. I love living here other than the items I mentioned. 12 Other concerns I would like to visit Vistoso Trails but am apprehensive due to lack of information regarding what I should prepare for and anticipate seeing upon my visit(s). 12 Other concerns It is a pretty depressing sight in its current state. It needs first and foremost to no longer look like an abandoned and weed filled golf course. 12 Other concerns What about the KAI property donated to the town at Oracle and Push View. I would like Vistoso project halted and the town to invest in making this a park for all. Not just the homeowners at the old golf course. That is why it was donated to the town. Do something with it!! Not an abandoned golf course!! 12 Other concerns I’d rather keep this area with fewer people instead of making it busier. I have enough people looking in my house and making my family feel uncomfortable. 12 Other concerns Seems like it is still kind of a big mess - why hasn't more clean up been done over the past 2 years? Also, the area where all the landscaping chemicals are stored on W Pebble Creek Drive is an environmental mess and should have been cleaned up when the town took control. 12 Other concerns Visible town commitment is overdue, nothing has happened in almost 2 years. 12 Other concerns No additional trails or amenities need to be added! 12 Other concerns I'd like info on this park. I didn't know it exists. 12 Other concerns The property is in horrible condition. Please address this! 12 Other concerns The property is in dire condition! It looks like scorched Earth. Please start the revitalization process ASAP. 12 Other concerns Please clean up the grounds for these trails. 12 Other concerns Vistoso Trails is in seriously bad condition! 12 Other concerns The park has so much potential but it's in bad shape and needs attention! 12 Other concerns I've been wanting to visit VTNP but haven't made it yet. From what I've seen and heard, it's a great place but due to it's past use it obviously needs some rewilding to be more natural (for a nature preserve). I look forward to visiting soon. 12 Other concerns Fix the bathroom and leave the rest. We were already screwed over by the hoa. We don't need another project that gets left to ruin. My property borders this catastrophe. Personally, I believe the hoa is accountable for the mishaps. 12 Other concerns We should preserve the Preserve Vistoso. There are parks around if people want to enjoy a pond or recreational activities. There should be no major alterations. That was the goal behind its acquisition. 12 Other concerns Remove old irrigation system. Parking lot sign. 13 Other development Do NOT put apartments out there! It would be absolutely horrible!! 13 Other development No apartments. The entire feel of the preserve will be lost with their addition. Preserve the preserve and keep OV wild and beautiful 13 Other development Please keep it as a park instead of building commercial/residential imfrastructure. 13 Other development I oppose to a multifamily construction, the increase in traffic will going to damage the wildlife on the preserve. People will hit javalinas and other animals. 13 Other development The multi family construction will be a killer for the purpose of our neighborhood, it is sad that it will go on anyway regardless of what we think 13 Other development Don’t allow 130 apartment units to be built there. 18»Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve Town Council Update Cat # Category Is there anything else you would like to share with us? 13 Other development Construct single family residence homes similar to the existing homes where allows without infringing on existing property owners privacy. The existing homes along the walkway are beautiful. Doing so would allow the community to continue to thrive and allow new home owners the opportunity to enjoy. 14 Survey comments I carefully filled in a survey once before. Did you lose that? Not much has happened since. 14 Survey comments Limiting the preference to 4 seems --- limiting. Why not rank the choices 1 to 10? Will give you a way to prioritize better. 14 Survey comments Very confusing survey. I think you need to do the basics before you install benches, etc. What's the difference between a pond & a waterfall? Why don't you just put bollards in so people can't drive on the Preserve immediately? How much could they cost? Ditto for directional signs & trash receptacles. ID signs for trees & plants can come later. Restrooms & pedestrian control/safety. I don't think we need a classroom at all. It's a preserve, not a national park. Just revegetate 1st & leave it natural similar to Lambert Lane Park. Project for: Town of Oro Valley Project by: Sites Southwest February 20, 2024 Agenda »Master Plan Update Early Master Plan Current Master Plan »Survey Friends of Vistoso Trails Communitywide Parks and Recreation Advisory Board (PRAB) »Costs and Phasing »Q & A | Discussion Early Master Plan »System of walking/biking trails »Areas for wildlife viewing »Connect Vistoso trails to Community Trail System »Provide dispersed parking areas »Provide directional signage »Repurpose former pond for habitat, education wildlife viewing »Provide area for family gatherings at former pond »Repurpose driving range to include educational gardens »Provide educational opportunities (K to 6) »Provide interpretive opportunities such as dark sky viewing »Address wash areas erosion for safety »Create natural water features for habitat »Reestablish native vegetation throughout Preserve »Provide shade and seating areas »Develop operations and management protocols - »Existing Cart Path becomes Preserve trail (with modifications) »ADA – New Regulations »Staged revegetation strategy »Four parking lots, one shared use parking lot »Shade structures »Wildlife viewing structures »Pond node »Driving range node »Two outdoor classrooms »Wildlife drinkers »Archeology Southwest feedback included Current Master Plan Draft Survey I – Friends of Vistoso Trails Survey - Elements Rankings Friends 1 Cart Path Repairs 2 Re-Envision / Redesign Pond and Bulkhead 3 Native Seeding and Interstitial Landscape Planting 4 Revegetation and Reclamation of Fairways, Sand Traps, Greens and Tees 5 Restroom Friends Survey - Fundraising and Donations 1 40% Willing to Donate / 60% Not Willing to Donate 3 Donation Amounts: Some as high as $25,000.00 2 Donation Amounts: Between $100.00 to $500.00 With reservations) 4 Donations by Project Elements: First: pond bulkhead, all projects, native seeding and revegetation, cart path Second: native seeding, revegetation, waterfall/pond, pollinator garden, education garden Third: pollinator garden, waterfall/pond, cart path, native seeding, revegetation Fourth: all projects, native seeding, ped traffic control (stone canyon), pond bulkhead, revegetation Fifth: pollinator garden Friends Survey - Elements Ranking vs Donations 1 Cart Path Repairs 2 Re-Envision / Redesign Pond 3 Native Seeding and Interstitial Landscape Planting 4 Revegetate and Reclamation of Fairways, Sand Traps, Tees, and Greens 5 Other Work Friends Survey – Priorities for Donations Survey II – Communitywide Vistoso Trails Visits - 82% have visited | 15% have not visited Survey – Communitywide Survey – Communitywide 1 5 Native Seeding and Interstitial Landscape Planting 2 Revegetation and Reclamation of Fairways, Greens, and Tees 4 Pond and Bulkhead Cart Path Work 3 Restroom Survey III – PRAB Survey – PRAB 5 4 Native Seeding and Interstitial Landscape Planting 2 ADA Trail 1 Restroom Work Cart Path Work 3 Signage – Wayfinding Friends | Communitywide | PRAB Comparison Construction Costs Construction Costs Construction Costs Construction Costs Construction Costs Construction Costs »Pond Area Beautification Pond as Scenic Landscape Area $ 321,150.00 Rebuild Pond (to its former character) Bulkhead replaced with sloped edge $ 1,700,000.00 Bulkhead retained $ 2,200,000.00 Water Feature and Natural Ponds Water Feature and Natural Ponds $1,200,000.00 All Costs plus permits, taxes, and other soft costs Construction Costs »Revegetation Fully Implemented Driving Range $ 1,500,000.00 Driving Range Revegetated $ 600,000.00 Overall Revegetation of Old Golf Course $ 3,400,000.00 (entire golf course) $ 189,000.00 (each hole) Note: all holes (fairways, tees, greens, and sand traps) should be ranked by visibility and importance to the community. We would recommend that holes visible from streets be redeveloped first, followed by interior holes. Construction Costs »Other Amenities Signage $400,000.00 Gardens and Educational Features $353,000.00 Revegetation Prioritization »Prioritization of 18 Holes for Revegetation Note: all holes (fairways, tees, greens, and sand traps) should be ranked by visibility and importance to the community. We would recommend that holes visible from streets be redeveloped first, followed by interior holes. Q & A | Discussion