HomeMy WebLinkAboutPackets - Council Packets (875)
AGENDA
ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL
REGULAR SESSION
SEPTEMBER 5, 2018
ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
11000 N. LA CAÑADA DRIVE
REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS
COUNCIL REPORTS
DEPARTMENT REPORTS
The Mayor and Council may consider and/or take action on the items listed below:
ORDER OF BUSINESS: MAYOR WILL REVIEW THE ORDER OF THE MEETING
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
1.4th Quarter (April-June 2018) OVPD Stats
CALL TO AUDIENCE – At this time, any member of the public is allowed to address the Mayor and Town Council
on any issue not listed on today’s agenda. Pursuant to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, individual Council
Members may ask Town Staff to review the matter, ask that the matter be placed on a future agenda, or respond to
criticism made by speakers. However, the Mayor and Council may not discuss or take legal action on matters
raised during “Call to Audience.” In order to speak during “Call to Audience” please specify what you wish to
discuss when completing the blue speaker card.
PRESENTATIONS
1.Presentation by the Town of Oro Valley and On Your Left Fitness to the Southern Arizona Veterans and
First Responders Living Memorial, LLC
2.Proclamation - Achieve60AZ
3.Proclamation - National Preparedness Month
CONSENT AGENDA
(Consideration and/or possible action)
A.Minutes - July 18, 2018
B.Appointments to the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) and the Pima Association of Governments
(PAG) Environmental Planning Advisory Committee (EPAC)
C.Fiscal Year 2017/18 financial update through June 2018 (year-end)
D.Resolution No. (R)18-31, authorizing and approving a subgrantee agreement between the Town of Oro
Valley and the Arizona Department of Homeland Security to fund the purchase of two (2) License Plate
Readers (LPR's) under the Operation Stonegarden program
E.Resolution No. (R)18-32, authorizing and approving a task force agreement between the Drug
Enforcement Administration (DEA) and the Town of Oro Valley for the participation of one (1) Oro Valley
police officer in the Pima County HIDTA Investigative Task Force
F.Resolution No. (R)18-33, authorizing and approving a task force agreement between the Drug
Enforcement Administration (DEA) and the Town of Oro Valley for the participation of two (2) Oro Valley
police officers in the DEA Tucson Task Force
G.Resolution No. (R)18-34, repealing the Town of Oro Valley Public Works Transit Division Prevention of
Alcohol Misuse and Prohibited Drug Use Policy, and replacing with Transit Division Drug and Alcohol
Policy
H.Request for approval of a Final Plat for a residential subdivision, located on the northeast corner of La
Cañada Drive and Moore Road
I.Request for approval of a Block Plat for the Saguaros Viejos residential subdivision, located near the
northwest corner of La Cholla Boulevard and Naranja Drive
J.Resolution No. (R)18-35, declaring and adopting the results of the Oro Valley Primary Election held on
August 28, 2018 (Updated on 9/5/18 at 11:30 a.m.)
REGULAR AGENDA
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS (The Council may bring forth general topics for future meeting agendas. Council may
not discuss, deliberate or take any action on the topics presented pursuant to ARS 38-431.02H)
CALL TO AUDIENCE – At this time, any member of the public is allowed to address the Mayor and Town Council
on any issue not listed on today’s agenda. Pursuant to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, individual Council
Members may ask Town Staff to review the matter, ask that the matter be placed on a future agenda, or respond to
criticism made by speakers. However, the Mayor and Council may not discuss or take legal action on matters
raised during “Call to Audience.” In order to speak during “Call to Audience” please specify what you wish to
discuss when completing the blue speaker card.
ADJOURNMENT
POSTED: 8/29/18 at 5:00 p.m. by mrs
When possible, a packet of agenda materials as listed above is available for public inspection at least 24 hours prior
to the Council meeting in the office of the Town Clerk between the hours of 8:00 a.m. – 5:00p.m.
The Town of Oro Valley complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If any person with a disability needs
any type of accommodation, please notify the Town Clerk’s Office at least five days prior to the Council meeting at
229-4700.
INSTRUCTIONS TO SPEAKERS
Members of the public have the right to speak during any posted public hearing. However, those items not
listed as a public hearing are for consideration and action by the Town Council during the course of their
business meeting. Members of the public may be allowed to speak on these topics at the discretion of the
Chair.
If you wish to address the Town Council on any item(s) on this agenda, please complete a speaker card located on
the Agenda table at the back of the room and give it to the Town Clerk. Please indicate on the speaker card
which item number and topic you wish to speak on, or if you wish to speak during “Call to Audience”,
please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card.
Please step forward to the podium when the Mayor announces the item(s) on the agenda which you are interested
in addressing.
1. For the record, please state your name and whether or not you are a Town resident.
2. Speak only on the issue currently being discussed by Council. Please organize your speech, you will only be
allowed to address the Council once regarding the topic being discussed.
3. Please limit your comments to 3 minutes.
4. During “Call to Audience” you may address the Council on any issue you wish.
5. Any member of the public speaking must speak in a courteous and respectful manner to those present.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Town Council Regular Session 1.
Meeting Date:09/05/2018
Submitted By:Tara Barry, Town Manager's Office
Information
Subject
4th Quarter (April-June 2018) OVPD Stats
Attachments
4th Quarter (April-June 2018) OVPD Stats
# of calls %# of calls %
45 83%150 86%
9 17%24 14%
Total Calls Total Calls
# of calls %# of calls %
1035 97%2138 99%
31 3%22 1%
Total Calls Total Calls
Over 15 minutes Over 30 minutes
1066 2160
Average Overall Response Time 7:05 Average Overall Response Time 7:06
Total Response Time Total Response Time
Goal: Total Response under 15 minutes 90% of the time Goal: Total Response under 30 minutes 90% of the time
Under 15 minutes Under 30 minutes
54 174
Average Overall Response Time 3:28 Average Overall Response Time 4:50
Priority 3 Priority 4
Goal: Total Response under 5 minutes 90% of the time Goal: Total Response under 8 minutes 90% of the time
Under 5 minutes Under 8 minutes
Over 5 minutes Over 8 minutes
ORO VALLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT
April through June 2018
Priority 1 Priority 2
Total Response Time Total Response Time
Citations 2018 TOTAL APR MAY JUN
TOWN CODE 96 42 22 32
SIZE, WEIGHT, LOAD 0 0 0 0
INSURANCE VIOLATION 132 43 45 44
REGISTRATION VIOLATION 71 22 24 25
DRIVERS LICENSE VIOLATION 87 19 32 36
DUI ARRESTS 49 17 18 14
RECKLESS/AGGRESSIVE DRIVING 0 0 0 0
SPEEDING 241 66 89 86
LANE VIOLATIONS 39 21 12 6
RED LIGHT 10 6 1 3
STOP SIGN 4 1 2 1
FAILURE TO YIELD 19 10 7 2
SEATBELT VIOLATION 7 1 4 2
CHILD RESTRAINT 0 0 0 0
EQUIPMENT VIOLATIONS 12 6 4 2
PARKING 0 0 0 0
LITTERING 4 3 1 0
OTHER CITATIONS 25 3 11 11
Total Citations 700 218 250 232
Based on further investigation and updating of information, actual classifications may change resulting in small variances in counts.
*DUIs are arrest counts, not citations counts, and may change like arrest figures do
*Traffic data delayed at least 30 days due to data entry backlog and may be updated with adjustments periodically
TITLE 28 VIOLATIONS
Fiscal Year 17/18 3rd Qtr TOTAL APR MAY JUN
Total Calls 4540 1543 1506 1491
Commercial Veh Enforcement 18 3 11 4
Residential Burglaries 6 3 1 2
Non-Residential Burglaries 7 3 2 2
All Burglary Attempts 4 2 0 2
Thefts 143 41 50 52
Vehicle Thefts 3 0 1 2
Recovered Stolen Vehicles 4 2 2 0
Attempted Vehicle Thefts 0 0 0 0
DUI 49 17 18 14
Liquor Laws 1 0 1 0
Drug Offenses 45 10 15 20
Homicides 0 0 0 0
Robbery 1 0 0 1
Assault 27 15 5 7
Total Arrests 465 150 158 157
Assigned Cases 225 80 81 64
Alarms (Residential)201 59 72 70
Alarms (Business)138 46 45 47
K9 Searches 38 15 11 12
First Aid Calls 684 242 239 203
Fatal Accidents**0 0 0 0
Accidents**132 57 43 32
Citations (Traffic)*700 218 250 232
Public Assists 77 25 22 30
Reserve Man Hours 0 0 0 0
Business Checks***1125 401 399 325
Drug Task Force Arrest 16 11 5
CVAP Dark House Checks 3606 376 1202 2028
CVAP Public Assists 271 72 79 120
CVAP Total Hours 3345 988 1243 1114
*Traffic data delayed up to 30 days due to data entry backlog. Periodic adjustments made.
**DUI Accidents are included in Fatal Accident and Accident totals.
ORO VALLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICE ACTIVITY SUMMARY
Disclaimer: Numbers may show slight fluctuations when compared to previously published reports because of
changes in the case data within the system due to normal adjustments. The more recent case counts are the
most likely to fluctuate. Although this data may change slightly, it is as accurate as it can be for the data
collected during this time period.
Apr-Jun Apr-Jun Apr-Jun
2016 2017 2018
Total Calls 4932 4643 4540
Commercial Veh Enforcement 12 43 18
Residential Burglaries 14 8 6
Non-Residential Burglaries 6 8 7
All Burglary Attempts 4 1 4
Thefts 132 102 143
Vehicle Thefts 4 5 3
Recovered Stolen Vehicles 2 3 4
Attempted Vehicle Thefts 0 0 0
DUI Arrests 50 58 49
Liquor Laws 6 6 1
Drug Offenses 42 45 45
Homicides 0 0 0
Robbery 2 0 1
Assault 18 28 27
Total Arrests 401 357 468
Assigned Cases 208 187 225
Alarms (Residential)253 227 201
Alarms (Business)119 154 138
K9 Searches 34 86 38
First Aid Calls 791 762 684
Fatal Crashes 1 0 0
Crashes 171 149 132
Citations (Traffic)837 784 700
Public Assists 129 175 77
Reserve Man Hours 0 0 0
Business Checks 1171 431 1125
Drug Task Force Arrest 13 11 16
CVAP Dark House Cks 4267 3710 3606
CVAP Public Assists 267 300 271
CVAP Total Hours 3854 3416.5 3345
April-June
Numbers subject to fluctuate slightly due to reclassifications.
Town Council Regular Session 1.
Meeting Date:09/05/2018
Presentation by the Town of Oro Valley and On Your Left Fitness to the Southern Arizona Veterans and First
Responders Living Memorial LLC
Information
Subject
Presentation by the Town of Oro Valley and On Your Left Fitness to the Southern Arizona Veterans and First
Responders Living Memorial, LLC
Summary
Attachments
No file(s) attached.
Town Council Regular Session 2.
Meeting Date:09/05/2018
Proclamation - Achieve60AZ
Information
Subject
Proclamation - Achieve60AZ
Summary
Attachments
Proclamation
Town Council Regular Session 3.
Meeting Date:09/05/2018
Proclamation - National Preparedness Month
Information
Subject
Proclamation - National Preparedness Month
Summary
Attachments
Proclamation
Town Council Regular Session A.
Meeting Date:09/05/2018
Requested by: Mike Standish Submitted By:Michelle Stine, Town Clerk's Office
Department:Town Clerk's Office
Information
SUBJECT:
Minutes - July 18, 2018
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
N/A
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to approve, (approve with the following changes) the July 18, 2018 minutes.
Attachments
7-18-18 Draft Minutes
7/18/18 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 1
MINUTES
ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL
REGULAR SESSION
July 18, 2018
ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE
REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 4:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Hiremath called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:Satish Hiremath, Mayor
Lou Waters, Vice Mayor
Joe Hornat, Councilmember
Rhonda Piña, Councilmember
Bill Rodman, Councilmember
Mary Snider, Councilmember
Steve Solomon, Councilmember
EXECUTIVE SESSION - 1. Pursuant to ARS 38-431.03(A)(3) and (A)(4) for discussion
and consultation with the attorneys of the public body for legal advice regarding contract
negotiations. 2. Pursuant to ARS 38-431.03(A)(3) and (A)(7) for discussion and
consultation with the attorneys of the public body for legal advice regarding settlement
negotiations
MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Rodman and seconded by Vice
Mayor Waters to go into Executive Session at 4:02 p.m. pursuant to ARS 38-
431.03(A)(3) and (A)(4) for discussion and consultation with the attorneys of the public
body for legal advice regarding contract negotiations and possible ARS 38-431.03(A)(3)
and (A)(7) for discussion and consultation with the attorneys of the public body for legal
advice regarding settlement negotiations.
MOTION carried, 7-0.
REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Hiremath called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
7/18/18 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 2
PRESENT:Satish Hiremath, Mayor
Lou Waters, Vice Mayor
Joe Hornat, Councilmember
Rhonda Piña, Councilmember
Bill Rodman, Councilmember
Mary Snider, Councilmember
Steve Solomon, Councilmember
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Hiremath led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance.
UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS
Town Clerk Mike Standish announced the upcoming Town meetings.
COUNCIL REPORTS
No Council reports were received.
DEPARTMENT REPORTS
Town Clerk Mike Standish announced that new artwork was on display in the Council
Chambers by artist Miera.
ORDER OF BUSINESS
Mayor Hiremath reviewed the order of business and stated that the order would stand
as posted.
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
1.Councilmember Hornat -2018 AZAPA Land Use Law Update Trip Report
CALL TO AUDIENCE
Oro Valley resident Mike Zinkin spoke about various allegations concerning
Councilmember Solomon.
Oro Valley resident Eric Gormally voiced his concerns regarding the well on his
property.
PRESENTATIONS
1.Proclamation -Drowning Impact Awareness Month
7/18/18 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 3
Mayor Hiremath proclaimed August 2018 as Drowning Impact Awareness Month.
Golder Ranch Fire District Community Relations Manager Anne-Marie Braswell
accepted the proclamation and expressed the importance of citizen participation to help
reduce drowning risks.
2.Presentation from the Oro Valley Optimist Club regarding veterinarian care
funding for Oro Valley Police Canines after retirement
Mayor Hiremath and Councilmember Piña gave an overview of the vision and purpose
of the police Canine fund.
President of the Oro Valley Optimist Club and Oro Valley resident Don Cox, spoke
regarding the Optimist Club's role for this project. Mr. Cox encouraged citizens to
consider donating to the Canine Care fund.
Oro Valley business owner and resident Lisa Bayless donated $1000.00 to the Oro
Valley Optimist Club to support the police Canine fund.
Mr. Cox said additional donations could be sent to the Oro Valley Optimist Club, Care of
Youth Fund Retirement Police Canine at 1065 W. Squawbush Court, Oro Valley, AZ
85737.
CONSENT AGENDA
Councilmember Rodman requested that item (B) be removed from the Consent Agenda
for discussion.
A.Minutes - June 6, 2018
C.Resolution No. (R)18-28, authorizing and approving a High Intensity Drug
Trafficking Area (HIDTA) grant agreement with the City of Tucson, allowing for
one (1) officer to be assigned to the Pima County HIDTA Investigative Task Force
(PCHITF)
MOTION:A motion was made by Vice Mayor Waters and seconded by Councilmember
Rodman to approve Consent Agenda items (A) and (C).
MOTION carried, 7-0.
B.Fiscal Year 2017/18 Financial Update through May 2018
Councilmember Rodman requested an overview of the Fiscal Year 2017/18 Financial
Update through May 2018.
Finance Director Stacey Lemos provided an overview of the Fiscal Year 2017/18
Financial Update through May 2018 and included fund surpluses and projections.
7/18/18 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 4
Discussion ensued amongst Council and staff regarding item B.
MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Rodman and seconded by
Councilmember Snider to approve Consent Agenda item (B).
MOTION carried, 7-0.
REGULAR AGENDA
1.DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THE CONCEPTUAL
SITE PLAN, LANDSCAPE PLAN AND PHASE I ARCHITECTURE FOR TWO
OFFICE BUILDINGS, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ORACLE ROAD,
JUST NORTH OF GREENOCK DRIVE
Senior Planner Milini Simms gave an overview of item #1 and outlined the following:
- Purpose
- Conceptual Site and Landscape Plan
- Conceptual Architecture
- Compatibility with Surrounding Architecture
- Public Participation
- Summary and Recommendation
Discussion ensued amongst Council and staff regarding item #1.
MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Piña and seconded by
Councilmember Solomon to approve the Conceptual Site Plan, Landscape Plan and
Phase 1 Architecture, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1, finding they are in
conformance with the Design Principles and applicable Design Standards of the Zoning
Code.
Attachment 1
Office buildings on Oracle Road
(OV1801101)
Conditions of Approval
Conceptual Site Plan
1. Address all comments in the Planning letter dated June 27, 2018.
2. The associated Minor Land Division demonstrating shared access must be approved
by Town staff and recorded with Pima County, prior to issuing grading permits.
3. All perimeter plants, including shrubs and accents, shall be shown on the Final
7/18/18 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 5
Landscape Plan and included in the first phase of development.
4. All mechanical equipment shall be fully screened. A detail depicting an architecturally
compatible screening method must be provided on the Final Landscape Plan.
Conceptual Architecture
5. All mechanical equipment shall be fully screened. A detail depicting an architecturally
compatible screening method must be provided, prior to final approval.
6. The proposed downspouts shall be internalized into the columns or building.
7. Ladder access to the roof shall be located inside the building through a riser room or
other applicable space.
MOTION carried, 7-0.
2.DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING A CONCEPTUAL SITE
PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR VICTORY WORSHIP CENTER AND
SPRINGBOARD YOUTH CRISIS CENTER, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF TANGERINE ROAD AND COMO DRIVE
Senior Planner Milini Simms gave an overview of item #2 and outlined the following:
- Purpose
- Revised Conceptual Site and Landscape Plans
- Public Participation
- Summary and recommendation
MOTION:A motion was made by Vice Mayor Waters and seconded by Councilmember
Hornat to approve the Conceptual Site and Landscape Plan for Victory Worship Center,
subject to the conditions in Attachment 1, based on the finding it is in conformance with
the Design Principles and applicable Design Standards of the Zoning Code.
Attachment 1
Victory Worship Center
(OV1801125)
Conditions of Approval
1. Address all comments in the Planning letter dated June 27, 2018.
2. A General Note shall be added stating "Should Como Drive be fully improved, full
access onto Como Drive may be granted as determined by the Town Engineer."
3. All existing easements for shared access and parking must be shown on the Final
Site plan.
7/18/18 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 6
MOTION carried, 7-0.
3.DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON AMENDING SECTION 25.1 OF
THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REGARDING STANDARDS FOR
COMMUNICATION FACILITIES
a. RESOLUTION NO. (R)18-29, DECLARING THE PROPOSED ZONING CODE
AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 25 REGARDING STANDARDS FOR
COMMUNICATION FACILITIES, PROVIDED IN EXHIBIT "A" WITHIN
ATTACHMENT 1 AND FILED WITH THE TOWN CLERK, A PUBLIC RECORD
b. PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE NO. (O)18-11, AMENDING CHAPTER 25
OF THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REGARDING COMMUNICATION
FACILITIES
MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Snider and seconded by Vice Mayor
Waters to approve Resolution No. (R)18-29, declaring the proposed Zoning Code
amendments to Section 25.1, regarding standards for communication facilities as
provided in Attachment 1 and filed with the Town Clerk, a public record.
MOTION carried, 7-0.
Senior Planner Milini Simms presented item #3b and outlined the following;
- Purpose
- Update Setback Requirements
- Conformance with Federal law
- General Plan Conformance
- Summary and Recommendation
Discussion ensued amongst Council and staff regarding item #3b.
Mayor Hiremath opened the public hearing.
No comments were received.
Mayor Hiremath closed the public hearing.
MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Snider and seconded by Vice Mayor
Waters to approve Ordinance No. (O)18-11, amending Section 25.1 of the Oro Valley
Zoning Code regarding standards for communication facilities as provided in
Attachment 2.
MOTION carried, 7-0.
7/18/18 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 7
4.DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON A PROPOSED COMMUNICATION
FACILITY LOCATED ON THE SAHUARO VISTA VETERINARY CLINIC
PROPERTY, NEAR THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF COOL DRIVE AND
ORACLE ROAD
Senior Planner Milini Simms presented item #4 and outlined the following:
- Purpose
- Tier II Communication Facility
- Stealth Applications
- Public Participation
- General Plan Conformance
- Summary and Recommendation
Discussion ensued amongst Council and staff regarding item #4.
MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Rodman and seconded by Vice
Mayor Waters to approve the proposed cell tower, subject to the conditions in
Attachment 1, finding it meets the applicable zoning provisions and the General Plan.
Discussion continued amongst Council and staff regarding item #4.
MOTION carried, 7-0.
5.DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON AMENDING CHAPTER 23 OF THE
ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REGARDING ATTACHED DWELLINGS IN THE
R-6 ZONING DISTRICT AND OTHER RELATED REVISIONS
a. RESOLUTION NO. (R)18-30, DECLARING THE PROPOSED ZONING CODE
AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 23 RELATED TO ATTACHED DWELLINGS IN
THE R-6 ZONING DISTRICT AND OTHER RELATED REVISIONS, PROVIDED
IN EXHIBIT "A" WITHIN ATTACHMENT 1 AND FILED WITH THE TOWN
CLERK, A PUBLIC RECORD
b. PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE NO. (O)18-12, AMENDING CHAPTER 23
OF THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE TO ALLOW ATTACHED DWELLINGS
IN THE R-6 MULTI-FAMILY DISTRICT AND OTHER RELATED REVISIONS
MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Rodman and seconded by
Councilmember Snider to approve Resolution No. (R)18-30, declaring the proposed
amendments to Chapter 23 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code regarding attached dwellings
in the R-6 zoning district and other related updates as shown in Attachment 1 and filed
with the Town Clerk, a public record.
MOTION carried, 7-0.
7/18/18 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 8
Planning Manager Bayer Vella presented item #5b and included the following;
- Purpose - Permit "Attached Dwellings" in R-6 Zones
- Location R-6 Zoning
- Transitions
- Development Standards
- Recommendation
Councilmember Solomon recused himself from item #5b.
Discussion ensued amongst Council and staff regarding item #5b.
Mayor Hiremath opened the public hearing.
The following individual spoke in opposition to item #5b.
-Oro Valley resident Paul Loomis
Mayor Hiremath closed the public hearing.
Discussion continued amongst Council and staff regarding item #5b.
MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Rodman and seconded by
Councilmember Hornat to approve Ordinance No. (O)18-12, amending Chapter 23 of
the Oro Valley Zoning Code regarding attached dwellings in the R-6 zoning district and
other related updates as shown in Attachment 2, Exhibit "A".
MOTION carried, 6-0, with Councilmember Solomon absent.
Councilmember Solomon returned to the meeting at 7:25 p.m.
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
No future agenda items were requested.
CALL TO AUDIENCE
No comments were received.
ADJOURNMENT
MOTION:A motion was made by Councilmember Snider and seconded by
Councilmember Piña to adjourn the meeting at 7:27 p.m.
MOTION carried, 7-0.
7/18/18 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 9
Prepared by:
__________________________
Michelle Stine, CMC
Deputy Town Clerk
I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of
the regular session of the Town of Oro Valley Council of Oro Valley, Arizona held on the
18th day of July, 2018. I further certify that the meeting was duly called and held and
that a quorum was present.
Dated this _____ day of ____________________, 2018.
___________________________
Michael Standish, CMC
Town Clerk
Town Council Regular Session B.
Meeting Date:09/05/2018
Requested by: Mike Standish Submitted By:Michelle Stine, Town Clerk's Office
Department:Town Clerk's Office
Information
SUBJECT:
Appointments to the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) and the Pima Association of Governments (PAG)
Environmental Planning Advisory Committee (EPAC)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the appointment of Michael Wilson to the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) to a term that
expires December 31, 2018, which is a partial term to fill a current vacancy. Please note, this is a partial term which
will not be counted against his term limits.
Staff recommends the appointment of Georgia Pennington to the Pima Association of Governments Environmental
Planning Advisory Committee (PAG-EPAC) to a term that expires 12/31/19, which is a partial term to fill a current
vacancy. Please note, this is a partial term which will not be counted against her term limits.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The HPC was formed to promote the educational, cultural and economic welfare of Oro Valley by insuring the
preservation of historic buildings, districts, landmarks, structures, documents, photographs and other artifacts that
represent the historic background and development of the greater Oro Valley area.
The Pima Association of Governments Environmental Planning Advisory Committee (PAG-EPAC) was formed to
provide information and coordinate among jurisdictional and other members in order to advise the PAG Regional
Council, Management Committee and Executive Director on regional environmental planning issues.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
The request for appointments and the applications for the prospective members are attached.
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to (approve or deny) the following appointments to be made effective September 5, 2018:
Michael Wilson to the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) to a partial term that expires December 31, 2018.
Georgia Pennington to the Pima Association of Governments Environmental Planning Advisory Committee
(PAG-EPAC) to a partial term that expires December 31, 2019.
Attachments
Wilson Application
Pennington Application
Town Council Regular Session C.
Meeting Date:09/05/2018
Requested by: Stacey Lemos Submitted By:Wendy Gomez, Finance
Department:Finance
Information
SUBJECT:
Fiscal Year 2017/18 financial update through June 2018 (year-end)
RECOMMENDATION:
N/A
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Attached hereto are the preliminary, unaudited Fiscal Year 2017/18 year-end financials for the General Fund,
Highway Fund, Bed Tax Fund and Community Center Fund through June 2018, as well as a consolidated year-end
summary for all Town funds. Please note that figures are subject to final adjustments.
In the General Fund, total actual revenues for the year came in over budget by approximately $1.7 million or 4.7%.
Expenditures for the year were under budget by approximately $1.3 million or 3.6%. Council-approved, one-time
uses of contingency reserves included costs associated with the Regional Municipalities Veteran's Treatment
Court, which were $56,250. After accounting for this one-time use of contingency, the General Fund ended the year
with an overall increase in fund balance of $2,571,457. Please note this does NOT include the transfer of estimated
year-end remaining fund balance in the Bed Tax Fund, which is approximately $618,000. This transfer will occur in
July 2018 (FY 18/19) to accommodate our audit of the FY 17/18 financials. The estimated FY 17/18 year-end fund
balance in the General Fund is nearly $16.0 million, which reflects 45.1% of total FY 17/18 estimated expenditures.
In the Highway Fund, total actual revenues for the year came in under budget by approximately $265,000 or 6.9%.
Expenditures for the year were under budget by nearly $992,000 or 20.0%. Overall, the Highway Fund ended the
year with a decrease in fund balance of $388,776 (note that the budgeted decrease in fund balance was
approximately $1.1 million). The estimated year-end fund balance in the Highway Fund is approximately $962,000.
In the Bed Tax Fund, total actual revenues for the year came in over budget by approximately $237,000 or 20.9%.
Expenditures for the year were under budget by about $37,000 or 3.0%. Transfers out of the Bed Tax Fund
included $185,000 to the General Fund for the Aquatic Center operations ($150,000), repayment of contingency
reserves used to construct the center ($35,000) and approximately $225,000 for debt service on the Aquatic Center.
Overall, the Bed Tax Fund ended the year with an increase in fund balance of approximately $155,000 (note that
the fund balance was budgeted to decrease approximately $119,000). The estimated year-end fund balance in the
Bed Tax Fund is approximately $618,000. Please note that this remaining fund balance will be transferred to the
General Fund in July 2018 (FY 18/19), per the Adopted FY 18/19 Budget.
In the Community Center Fund , total actual revenues for the year came in over budget by approximately $216,000
or 3.3%. Expenditures for the year were over budget by about $193,000 or 3.0%. The Community Center Fund
ended the year with a surplus of about $23,000 and an estimated year-end fund balance at a negative $74,010.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
GENERAL FUND RECAP
GENERAL FUND RECAP
General Fund actual revenues totaled $38,035,783. Local sales taxes, licenses and permits, and miscellaneous
revenues came in significantly over budget, while grants, intergovernmental revenues and interest income came in
under budget. Overall, General Fund revenue collections came in $1.7 million over the adopted budget amount.
Additional information regarding local sales tax collections for the year is provided below:
Retail tax collections totaled $8.4 million for the fiscal year, up 4.5% or $365,000 over last fiscal year (all
funds)
Restaurant and bar tax collections totaled $2.2 million for the fiscal year, up 7.4% or $150,000 over last fiscal
year (all funds)
Construction tax collections totaled almost $5.6 million for the fiscal year, up 15.9% or $761,000 over last
fiscal year
Utility tax collections totaled approximately $3.1 million for the fiscal year, up 6.9% or $198,000 from last
fiscal year
General Fund fiscal year expenditures totaled $35,408,077 or approximately $1.3 million under the budgeted
amount of $36.7 million. Departmental O&M and personnel savings totaled approximately $996,000. Capital outlay
expenditures came in about $47,000 under budget due to savings in several departments, including Community
Development & Public Works, Parks & Recreation and Police.
HIGHWAY FUND RECAP
The largest revenue source in the Highway Fund, Highway User Revenue Fund (HURF) gas taxes, totaled
$3,333,250 or approximately $30,000 under the budget amount of $3.4 million. Expenditures in the Highway Fund
came in under budget by about $992,000 or 20.0%. Of this amount, roughly $714,000 is pavement preservation
savings, due primarily to the Pima County property tax for roads that covered the Town's residential spring surface
treatments. In addition, the $250,000 Safeway/1st Ave Safety CIP project was rolled over to FY 18/19.
BED TAX FUND RECAP
Bed Tax collections for the fiscal year totaled $1,372,344, more than $245,000 over the budget amount of $1.1
million. Personnel and O&M savings totaled $58,595. Capital outlay came in over budget by about $21,000, due to
tennis court improvements at the Community Center. Transfers out totaled $410,019, with the breakdown as
referenced in the Executive Summary above.
COMMUNITY CENTER FUND RECAP
Contracted operating revenues from Troon came in on budget, at nearly $3.4 million.
Contracted operating expenditures from Troon totaled almost $5.4 million, which is approximately $175,000 or 3.4%
over the budget amount of $5.2 million. This overage was primarily due to water costs exceeding the budgeted
amount. The overall contracted operating expenditures exceeded overall contracted operating revenues by $2.0
million. This net operating loss was more than offset by $2.3 million collected in dedicated half cent sales tax
proceeds for the year.
Town operating revenues totaled $973,673, nearly $200,000 or 25.2% over the budget amount of $777,580. With
the exception of concession sales, all other revenue categories came in significantly over budget.
Town operating expenditures totaled $1,097,473, roughly $67,000 or 6.5% over the budget amount of $1,030,406.
The overage in Town operating expenditures was more than offset by the overage in Town operating revenues.
Local sales tax revenues from the dedicated half-cent sales tax totaled $2,330,941 or 1.0% over budget. This was
due to retail and restaurant and bar tax collections.
Capital outlay expenditures totaled $45,464, compared to the budget amount of $94,250.
The overall ending fund balance in the Community Center Fund is estimated at a negative $74,010, which includes
accounting for the second of ten annual loan repayment amounts of $120,000 back to the General Fund to repay
that fund for the $1.2 million transferred to the Community Center Fund for start-up operational and capital costs
when the facility was initially acquired in 2015.
Please see Attachment A for additional details on the General Fund, Attachment B for additional details on the
Highway Fund, Attachment C for additional details on the Bed Tax Fund, and Attachments D-1, D-2 and D-3 for
additional details on the Community Center Fund. Please see Attachment E for a consolidated summary of all
Town funds. Please see Attachment F for a monthly tracking of General Fund local sales tax collections, including
construction and utility sales tax.
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUGGESTED MOTION:
N/A
Attachments
Attachment A - General Fund
Attachment B - Highway Fund
Attachment C - Bed Tax Fund
Attachment D-1 Community Center Fund
Attachment D-2 Troon Cash Flow
Attachment D-3 Troon F&B
Attachment E - Summary All Funds
Attachment F - Gen Fund Local Sales Tax
ATTACHMENT A
Year-End Financial Status (UNAUDITED)
General Fund
% Budget Completion through June --- 100%
% Actuals YE % Variance
to Budget to Budget
REVENUES:
LOCAL SALES TAX 18,617,864 17,164,573 108.5% 18,617,864 8.5%
LICENSES & PERMITS 2,634,574 2,063,121 127.7% 2,634,574 27.7%
FEDERAL GRANTS 387,097 471,342 82.1% 387,097 -17.9%
STATE GRANTS 139,391 234,760 59.4% 139,391 -40.6%
STATE/COUNTY SHARED 11,577,834 11,636,928 99.5% 11,577,834 -0.5%
OTHER INTERGOVERNMENTAL 1,636,354 1,793,360 91.2% 1,636,354 -8.8%
CHARGES FOR SERVICES 2,216,247 2,210,453 100.3% 2,216,247 0.3%
FINES 131,393 120,000 109.5% 131,393 9.5%
INTEREST INCOME (27,573) 103,000 -26.8% (27,573) -126.8%
MISCELLANEOUS 417,603 233,000 179.2% 417,603 79.2%
TRANSFERS IN 305,000 305,000 100.0%305,000 0.0%
TOTAL REVENUES 38,035,783 36,335,537 104.7% 38,035,783 4.7%
% Actuals YE % Variance
to Budget to Budget
EXPENDITURES:
COUNCIL 188,960 214,759 88.0% 188,960 -12.0%
CLERK 469,789 485,098 96.8% 469,789 -3.2%
MANAGER 821,708 844,708 97.3% 821,708 -2.7%
HUMAN RESOURCES 368,382 375,790 98.0% 368,382 -2.0%
FINANCE 768,622 810,006 94.9% 768,622 -5.1%
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 2,031,191 2,189,939 92.8% 2,031,191 -7.2%
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION 1,834,598 1,682,216 109.1% 1,834,598 9.1%
LEGAL 730,857 779,670 93.7% 730,857 -6.3%
COURT 875,222 874,282 100.1% 875,222 0.1%
COMM. DEV. & PUBLIC WORKS 4,829,818 4,893,469 98.7% 4,829,818 -1.3%
PARKS & RECREATION 3,328,253 3,667,092 90.8% 3,328,253 -9.2%
POLICE 16,636,009 17,108,674 97.2% 16,636,009 -2.8%
TRANSFERS OUT 2,524,668 2,799,668 90.2%2,524,668 -9.8%
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 35,408,077 36,725,371 96.4% 35,408,077 -3.6%
SURPLUS / (DEFICIT) 2,627,707 (389,834) 2,627,707
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 13,403,214
Plus: Surplus / (Deficit)2,627,707
Less:
Approved Use of Contingency Reserves During FY 17/18:
Regional Municipalities Veteran's Treatment Court (56,250)
ENDING FUND BALANCE **15,974,671
* Year-end estimates are subject to further revision
** Ending fund balance amounts are estimates and are subject to further revision
(A) Transfer of estimated remaining fund balance from the Bed Tax Fund (currently estimated at $617,963)
will occur in July 2018 (FY 18/19)
FY 2017/2018
Year End
Estimate *
Budget Year End
Estimate *
Actuals
thru 6/2018
Actuals
thru 6/2018
Budget
(A)
F:\BUDGET ANALYST\Financial Reports 2017-2018\4Q\June\June FY 18 Monthly Report 8/27/2018
ATTACHMENT B
Year-End Financial Status (UNAUDITED)FY 2017/2018
% Budget Completion through June --- 100%
Actuals
thru 6/2018 Budget % Actuals
to Budget
Year End
Estimate *
YE % Variance
to BudgetREVENUES:
LICENSES & PERMITS 45,116 57,000 79.2% 45,116 -20.8%
STATE GRANTS 146,208 100,000 146.2% 146,208 46.2%
STATE/COUNTY SHARED 3,333,250 3,363,581 99.1% 3,333,250 -0.9%
INTEREST INCOME 31,054 36,994 83.9% 31,054 -16.1%
MISCELLANEOUS 13,585 2,000 679.3% 13,585 579.3%
TRANSFERS IN - 275,000 0.0%- -100.0%
TOTAL REVENUES 3,569,213 3,834,575 93.1% 3,569,213 -6.9%
Actuals
thru 6/2018 Budget % Actuals
to Budget
Year End
Estimate *
YE % Variance
to Budget
EXPENDITURES:
ADMINISTRATION 725,485 741,063 97.9% 725,485 -2.1%
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING 842,162 661,582 127.3% 842,162 27.3%
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT 889,160 1,638,078 54.3% 889,160 -45.7%
STREET MAINTENANCE 1,053,293 1,064,607 98.9% 1,053,293 -1.1%
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 447,889 844,547 53.0%447,889 -47.0%
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 3,957,989 4,949,877 80.0% 3,957,989 -20.0%
SURPLUS / (DEFICIT) (388,776) (1,115,302) (388,776)
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 1,350,903
Plus: Surplus / (Deficit)(388,776)
ENDING FUND BALANCE **962,127
* Year-end estimates are subject to further revision
** Ending fund balance amounts are estimates and are subject to further revision
Highway Fund
F:\BUDGET ANALYST\Financial Reports 2017-2018\4Q\June\June FY 18 Monthly Report 8/27/2018
ATTACHMENT C
Year-End Financial Status (UNAUDITED)
% Budget Completion through June --- 100%
% Actuals YE % Variance
to Budget to Budget
REVENUES:
BED TAXES 1,372,344 1,126,955 121.8% 1,372,344 21.8%
INTEREST INCOME (86) 8,011 -1.1%(86) -101.1%
TOTAL REVENUES 1,372,257 1,134,966 120.9% 1,372,257 20.9%
% Actuals YE % Variance
to Budget to Budget
EXPENDITURES:
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 806,886 844,158 95.6% 806,886 -4.4%
TRANSFERS OUT 410,019 410,019 100.0%410,019 0.0%
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,216,905 1,254,177 97.0% 1,216,905 -3.0%
SURPLUS / (DEFICIT) 155,352 (119,211) 155,352
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 462,611
Plus: Surplus / (Deficit)155,352
ENDING FUND BALANCE **617,963
* Year-end estimates are subject to further revision
** Ending fund balance amounts are estimates and are subject to further revision
(A) Transfer of estimated remaining fund balance to the General Fund will occur in July 2018 (FY 18/19)
FY 2017/2018
Year End
Estimate *
Budget Year End
Estimate *
Bed Tax Fund
Budget Actuals
thru 6/2018
Actuals
thru 6/2018
(A)
F:\BUDGET ANALYST\Financial Reports 2017-2018\4Q\June\June FY 18 Monthly Report 8/27/2018
ATTACHMENT D-1
Year-End Financial Status (UNAUDITED)
% Budget Completion through June --- 100%
% Actuals YE % Variance
to Budget to Budget
REVENUES:
CONTRACTED OPERATING REVENUES
Golf Revenues 1,279,948 1,038,825 123.2% 1,279,948 23.2%
Member Dues (Golf) 784,071 959,009 81.8% 784,071 -18.2%
Tennis Revenues 362,270 345,900 104.7% 362,270 4.7%
Food & Beverage 745,578 793,887 93.9% 745,578 -6.1%
Merchandise & Other 214,995 244,730 87.8%214,995 -12.2%
3,386,862 3,382,351 100.1% 3,386,862 0.1%
TOWN OPERATING REVENUES
Daily Drop-Ins 33,194 23,000 144.3% 33,194 44.3%
Member Dues 721,231 614,000 117.5% 721,231 17.5%
Recreation Programs 160,410 134,000 119.7% 160,410 19.7%
Swim Team/Swim Lessons 16,498 1,500 1099.9% 16,498 999.9%
Facility Rental Income 42,081 4,580 918.8% 42,081 818.8%
Concession Sales 260 500 52.0%260 -48.0%
973,673 777,580 125.2% 973,673 25.2%
OTHER REVENUES
Local Sales Tax 2,330,941 2,308,112 101.0% 2,330,941 1.0%
Real Property Rental Income 19,502 27,861 70.0% 19,502 -30.0%
Miscellaneous 963 - 0.0%963 0.0%
2,351,407 2,335,973 100.7% 2,351,407 0.7%
TOTAL REVENUES 6,711,942 6,495,904 103.3% 6,711,942 3.3%
% Actuals YE % Variance
to Budget to Budget
EXPENDITURES:
CONTRACTED OPERATING EXPENDITURES
Personnel 2,133,324 2,121,525 100.6% 2,133,324 0.6%
Operations & Maintenance 2,850,346 2,712,454 105.1% 2,850,346 5.1%
Equipment Leases 396,232 371,313 106.7%396,232 6.7%
5,379,902 5,205,292 103.4% 5,379,902 3.4%
TOWN OPERATING EXPENDITURES
Personnel 799,508 745,858 107.2% 799,508 7.2%
Operations & Maintenance 297,965 284,548 104.7%297,965 4.7%
1,097,473 1,030,406 106.5% 1,097,473 6.5%
CAPITAL OUTLAY 45,464 94,250 48.2% 45,464 -51.8%
TRANSFERS OUT 165,956 165,956 100.0% 165,956 0.0%
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 6,688,795 6,495,904 103.0% 6,688,795 3.0%
SURPLUS / (DEFICIT) 23,147 - 23,147
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE (97,157)
Plus: Surplus / (Deficit)23,147
ENDING FUND BALANCE **(74,010)
* Year-end estimates are subject to further revision
** Ending fund balance amounts are estimates and are subject to further revision
FY 2017/2018
Actuals
thru 6/2018 Budget Year End
Estimate *
Community Center Fund
Actuals
thru 6/2018 Budget Year End
Estimate *
F:\BUDGET ANALYST\Financial Reports 2017-2018\4Q\June\June FY 18 Monthly Report 8/27/2018
ATTACHMENT D-2TROONEl Conquistador Cash Flow StatementActualActualActualActualActualActualActualActualActualActualActualActualActual Original BudgetJul-17Aug-17 Sep-17 Oct-17 Nov-17 Dec-17 Jan-18 Feb-18 Mar-18Apr-18May-18Jun-18TotalTOTALRevenues:Golf Fees, net of discounts20,933 29,780 50,962 67,564 80,238 57,727 111,925 144,337 182,283 121,156 54,672 39,684 961,261 780,706 Trail Fees & Member Cart Fees19,317 17,660 17,589 18,586 19,200 18,597 19,020 18,737 18,816 18,720 16,564 18,629 221,435 205,664 Golf - Group Services- 126 840 64 - - - 701 818 - 248 160 2,957 1,760 Range, Rentals, Other Golf related2,794 2,897 8,412 6,485 7,273 6,429 7,238 7,962 9,046 6,631 5,442 5,287 75,896 40,930 Golf Lessons 405 285 590 790 585 1,103 600 890 910 960 420 155 7,693 5,205 Income - Golf Schools 2,400 - - 955 540 270 1,500 735 1,245 225 450 2,386 10,706 4,560 Total Member Dues 58,678 60,153 59,790 71,812 73,398 69,778 71,938 73,810 73,839 62,255 56,232 52,388 784,071 959,009 Other Member Income 312 177 (247) 684 (202) (57) 102 273 64 106 20 150 1,382 - Swim/Tennis Revenues 25,228 14,808 35,800 51,936 27,259 31,159 30,082 24,590 34,344 28,489 25,070 33,505 362,270 345,900 Income - Other (non - golf) 11 75 - 77 44 2,005 797 81 1,168 3,203 5,391 257 13,109 - Merchandise, net of discounts 10,460 14,083 12,881 11,512 28,049 30,177 11,351 16,543 23,265 19,573 13,902 8,708 200,504 244,730 Food and Beverage, net of discounts 47,336 49,103 64,613 65,869 64,944 63,341 51,825 74,598 93,068 70,670 54,941 45,270 745,578 793,887 Total Revenues 187,874 189,147 251,230 296,334 301,328 280,529 306,378 363,257 438,866 331,988 233,352 206,579 3,386,862 3,382,351 Cost of Sales:COS - Group Services Golf 17 125 823 64 - - - 492 818 - 248 135 2,722 1,760 COS - Golf Lessons 324 333 475 616 468 985 480 712 728 734 336 25 6,216 3,644 COS - Golf Schools 1,666 - - 669 378 - 578 711 696 - - 1,938 6,636 3,648 COS - Service Commissions 15,523 12,325 17,775 19,043 20,326 19,594 19,775 18,415 20,555 18,592 15,813 25,836 223,572 176,330 COS - Merchandise, net of discounts 7,715 5,567 6,438 8,362 17,475 22,113 7,309 11,743 14,917 13,638 6,414 7,786 129,477 158,234 COS - Other (non - golf) (1,572) - - - - - - - - - - - (1,572) - COS - Food & Beverage 17,099 19,701 25,927 26,631 22,402 23,759 20,881 27,107 32,623 25,158 21,693 16,828 279,809 282,045 Total Cost of Sales 40,772 38,051 51,438 55,385 61,049 66,451 49,023 59,180 70,337 58,122 44,504 52,548 646,860 625,660 Gross Profit 147,102 151,096 199,792 240,949 240,279 214,078 257,355 304,077 368,529 273,866 188,848 154,031 2,740,002 2,756,691 Operating Expenses:Payroll 130,038 137,301 138,716 139,445 140,414 131,203 151,515 140,484 163,576 148,074 137,615 132,618 1,690,999 1,684,714 Employee Benefits 30,933 31,745 32,122 30,539 31,567 31,663 42,085 37,625 39,097 36,336 34,633 33,698 412,043 409,777 Employee Related 3,367 2,502 2,281 2,323 2,461 2,661 2,283 2,310 2,776 2,322 2,736 2,260 30,282 27,034 Advertising & Marketing 5,429 5,790 4,366 22,212 14,534 11,801 10,991 12,423 12,029 13,038 11,109 10,326 134,048 69,983 Repair & Maintenance 30,650 29,992 80,297 71,059 16,233 23,352 18,446 12,208 26,253 29,815 24,974 17,533 380,812 423,482 Operating Expenses 17,312 17,012 19,341 20,508 23,507 19,984 17,120 23,843 23,279 22,017 19,415 17,466 240,804 258,196 Total Operating Expenses 217,729 224,342 277,123 286,086 228,716 220,664 242,440 228,893 267,010 251,602 230,482 213,901 2,888,988 2,873,186 Operating Profit (70,627) (73,246) (77,331) (45,137) 11,563 (6,586) 14,915 75,184 101,519 22,264 (41,634) (59,870) (148,986) (116,495) Leases - Carts 9,282 9,282 9,282 9,282 9,282 9,282 14,874 18,259 14,169 9,282 14,173 13,630 140,076 119,745 Leases - Equipment23,029 23,780 20,580 22,670 19,277 20,974 22,670 19,277 20,974 20,975 22,672 19,277 256,156 251,568 Utilities127,430 120,728 147,704 181,357 88,249 65,763 43,103 59,263 76,824 114,309 129,230 142,149 1,296,109 1,190,026 Fixed Operating Expenses 159,741 153,790 177,566 213,309 116,807 96,018 80,648 96,799 111,966 144,566 166,075 175,055 1,692,341 1,561,339 Gross Operating Profit (230,368) (227,036) (254,897) (258,446) (105,244) (102,604) (65,733) (21,615) (10,447) (122,302) (207,709) (234,925) (1,841,327) (1,677,834) Insurance 97 97 97 97 97 97 98 98 98 98 98 98 1,170 1,107 Fees, Permits & Licenses 335 (5) 160 - 150 - - 100 - (6) - 734 Base Management Fees 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 144,000 144,000 Bad Debt337 5,048 250 (313) 646 (81) (81) (157) 462 (182) (120) 5,809 Total Other Expenses 12,097 12,769 17,140 12,507 11,784 12,893 12,017 12,017 12,041 12,560 11,910 11,978 151,713 145,107 Net Operating Income (Loss) (242,465) (239,805) (272,037) (270,953) (117,028) (115,497) (77,750) (33,632) (22,488) (134,862) (219,619) (246,903) (1,993,040) (1,822,941) 8/27/2018
ATTACHMENT D-3
ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET
MONTH MONTH Y-T-D Y-T-D
FOOD & BEVERAGE REVENUE 45,270 54,225 745,766 793,887
TOTAL REVENUES 45,270 54,225 745,766 793,887
COST OF SALES 16,828 20,424 279,809 282,045
PAYROLL & BENEFITS 31,981 36,460 472,359 507,236
OPERATING EXPENSES 5,083 4,350 89,698 77,100
NET INCOME (LOSS) (8,622) (7,009) (96,100) (72,494)
EL CONQUISTADOR
INCOME STATEMENT CONSOLIDATED - RESTAURANT/GRILLE - JUNE 2018
8/27/2018
ATTACHMENT EConsolidated Year-End Financial Report through June, 2018 (UNAUDITED)FY 2017/2018FY 17/18 Capital Leases/Left in AccountsBegin Bal. Transfer OutThru June 2018General Fund - Unassigned 11,961,352 37,730,783 305,000 38,035,783 2,570,121 24,712,696 7,556,246 569,014 56,250 35,464,327 14,532,809 General Fund - Assigned 1,441,862 - 1,441,862 Highway Fund - Committed 1,350,903 3,569,213 3,569,213 2,073,472 1,017,262 867,254 3,957,989 962,127 Seizure & Forfeiture - Justice/State 303,081 365,534 365,534 56,562 114,398 95,365 266,324 402,290 Bed Tax Fund - Committed 462,611 1,372,257 1,372,257 410,019 267,497 443,067 96,323 1,216,905 617,963 Impound Fee Fund 25,318 36,750 36,750 58,254 58,254 3,814 Community Center Fund (97,157) 6,711,942 6,711,942 562,188 799,508 5,281,635 45,464 6,688,795 (74,010) Municipal Debt Service Fund 89,327 150,085 683,783 833,868 10,000 824,460 834,460 88,735 Oracle Road Debt Service Fund 6,737 176,080 3,000 179,080 2,050 176,290 178,340 7,477 Alternative Water Resources Dev Impact Fee Fund 6,472,074 1,656,759 1,656,759 180,631 180,631 7,948,202 Potable Water System Dev Impact Fee Fund 5,558,044 801,448 801,448 20,566 331,627 352,192 6,007,299 Townwide Roadway Development Impact Fee Fund 3,097,156 868,666 868,666 1,105,727 1,105,727 2,860,095 Parks & Recreation Impact Fee Fund 514,986 296,501 296,501 539,400 539,400 272,087 Police Impact Fee Fund 505,282 148,700 148,700 - 653,982 General Government Impact Fee Fund 3,524 31 31 - 3,555 General Government CIP Fund 1,716,361 2,351,107 2,351,107 64,028 614 1,793,207 1,857,849 2,209,619 PAG/RTA Fund 884,762 4,440,387 4,440,387 168,043 4,574,483 4,742,526 582,624 Water Utility10,024,473 16,964,876 16,964,876 2,847 3,155,109 7,352,483 2,010,766 5,310,315 17,831,520 9,157,829 Stormwater Utility603,121 1,392,195 1,392,195 656,967 350,119 230,984 1,238,070 757,246 Fleet Fund 952,371 1,317,595 300,000 1,617,595 93,316 723,427 467,344 1,284,087 1,285,879 Benefit Self Insurance Fund (113,357) 3,592,299 3,592,299 2,778,181 2,778,181 700,761 Recreation In-Lieu Fee Fund 15,718 - - 15,718 Energy Efficiency Project Fund 568,337 - 568,251 568,251 86 Total 46,346,886 81,592,102 3,642,890 85,234,992 4,084,575 32,105,452 25,830,678 12,424,181 56,250 6,642,692 81,143,828 50,438,050 Fund RevenueOther Fin Sources/TfrsTotal InDebt Service Total OutPersonnel O&M Capital ContingencyF:\BUDGET ANALYST\Financial Reports 2017-2018\4Q\June\Attachment E - Summary All Funds8/27/2018
ATTACHMENT FGeneral Fund Local Sales Tax Collections FY 2017/18CATEGORYJULYAUGSEPOCTNOVDECJANFEBMARAPRMAYJUNETOTALConstruction Sales Tax 547,514 469,050 456,125 443,115 664,593 459,268 439,368 384,045 282,895 451,750 441,960 513,767 5,553,450 Utility Sales Tax 202,208 429,402 290,283 310,764 256,734 231,300 227,032 242,373 218,602 207,317 203,785 230,245 3,050,045 Retail Sales Tax 541,876 478,942 481,677 505,094 502,326 629,823 801,494 557,783 521,796 624,106 551,219 535,133 6,731,269 All Other Local Sales Tax *202,678 219,584 186,445 184,144 200,359 198,807 210,620 267,704 257,943 282,817 242,283 240,054 2,693,437 TOTAL 1,494,276$ 1,596,978$ 1,414,530$ 1,443,117$ 1,624,012$ 1,519,198$ 1,678,514$ 1,451,905$ 1,281,236$ 1,565,990$ 1,439,247$ 1,519,199$ 18,028,201$ FY 2016/17CATEGORYJULYAUGSEPOCTNOVDECJANFEBMARAPRMAYJUNETOTALConstruction Sales Tax 211,862 188,622 464,738 331,337 302,776 310,738 553,592 307,122 457,822 400,603 660,930 602,001 4,792,143 Utility Sales Tax 256,758 319,698 294,983 273,535 216,045 210,750 210,159 235,740 210,303 197,163 205,177 221,911 2,852,222 Retail Sales Tax 498,390 460,006 467,191 491,196 495,453 598,150 774,898 489,541 512,147 544,825 565,002 542,081 6,438,880 All Other Local Sales Tax *171,723 170,598 181,484 157,224 196,370 185,762 203,062 196,780 236,388 188,520 220,840 195,229 2,303,981 TOTAL 1,138,733$ 1,138,924$ 1,408,396$ 1,253,292$ 1,210,644$ 1,305,400$ 1,741,712$ 1,229,183$ 1,416,660$ 1,331,110$ 1,651,949$ 1,561,222$ 16,387,225$ * Note: Does not include cable franchise fees or sales tax audit revenuesF:\BUDGET ANALYST\Financial Reports 2017-2018\4Q\June\Attachment F - Gen Fund Local Sales Tax8/27/2018
Town Council Regular Session D.
Meeting Date:09/05/2018
Requested by: Daniel G. Sharp Submitted By:Colleen Muhr, Police Department
Department:Police Department
Information
SUBJECT:
Resolution No. (R)18-31, authorizing and approving a subgrantee agreement between the Town of Oro Valley and
the Arizona Department of Homeland Security to fund the purchase of two (2) License Plate Readers (LPR's) under
the Operation Stonegarden program
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Over the past several years, the Arizona Department of Homeland Security (AZDOHS) has partnered
with the Town of Oro Valley Police Department (OVPD), providing funding for Operation Stonegarden to
include overtime and mileage, as well as the purchase of critical equipment; and on January 16, 2018,
the Police Department was provided notice of available funding to purchase equipment.
OVPD wishes to enter into a subgrantee agreement with AZDOHS to fund the purchase of two (2)
License Plate Readers (LPR’s) to support officers deployed under the Operation Stonegarden program.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
The grant application was made in order to work in a regional partnership with other local law enforcement
agencies and the U.S. Border Patrol Tucson Sector to reduce crime and improve the quality of life for the residents
and visitors of Oro Valley. This grant will use targeted deployments of officers and canine units to impact the flow of
smugglers engaged in human trafficking and illegal contraband, as well as possible terrorists who intend to cause
harm or commit crimes against this nation.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The capacity exists in FY 18/19 budget to accept this grant award for a total of $28,620.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to (approve or deny) Resolution No. (R)18-31, authorizing and approving a subgrantee agreement between
the Town of Oro Valley and the Arizona Department of Homeland Security to fund the purchase of two (2) License
Plate Readers (LPR's) under the Operation Stonegarden program.
Attachments
(R)18-31 Equipment
160416-02
C:\Windows\TEMP\BCL Technologies \easyPDF 7 \@BCL@340AF4EF\@BCL@340AF4EF.doc Town of Oro Valley Attorney’s Office/ca/012512
RESOLUTION NO. (R)18-31
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING A
SUBGRANTEE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
AND THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY TO
FUND EQUIPMENT UNDER THE OPERATION STONEGARDEN
PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the Arizona Department of Homeland Security (AZDOHS) requires participating
jurisdictions to enter into a Subgrantee Agreement to receive the funds granted under the
Operation Stonegarden Program; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Oro Valley’s allocation under the grant is a maximum of $28,620
which will be used to fund equipment under the Operation Stonegarden Program for
deployments with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security Bureau of Customs and Border
Protection; and
WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the Town of Oro Valley to enter into the Subgrantee
Agreement (attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference ) in order to
receive funds which will be used to fund equipment under the Operation Stonegarden Program
for deployments with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security Bureau of Customs and Border
Protection.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of
Oro Valley, Arizona, that:
1. The Subgrantee Agreement between the Town of Oro Valley, for the benefit of the Oro
Valley Police Department and the Arizona Department of Homeland Security, attached
hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference, to fund equipment under
the Operation Stonegarden Program for deployments with the U.S. Department of
Homeland Security Bureau of Customs and Border Protection is hereby authorized and
approved.
2. The Mayor and other administrative officials of the Town of Oro Valley are hereby
authorized to take such steps as are necessary to execute and implement the terms of the
Subgrantee Agreement.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley,
Arizona, this 5th day of September, 2018.
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA
Dr. Satish I. Hiremath, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Michael Standish, Town Clerk Tobin Sidles, Legal Services Director
Date: Date:
EXHIBIT “A”
Town Council Regular Session E.
Meeting Date:09/05/2018
Requested by: Daniel G. Sharp Submitted By:Catherine Hendrix, Police Department
Department:Police Department
Information
SUBJECT:
Resolution No. (R)18-32, authorizing and approving a task force agreement between the Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA) and the Town of Oro Valley for the participation of one (1) Oro Valley police officer in the
Pima County HIDTA Investigative Task Force
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
A request is being made to enter into an agreement with the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for the
continued participation of one (1) Oro Valley police officer in the Pima County HIDTA Investigative Task Force.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
On July 8, 2018, Resolution No. (R)18-28, authorizing and approving HIDTA Grant Agreement HT-18-2819 was
approved, allowing the City of Tucson to serve as the fiduciary to administer financial oversight for the DEA.
If approved, this agreement will provide for continued participation in these cooperative efforts to disrupt illicit drug
traffic in the State of Arizona, gather and report intelligence data related to drug trafficking, and conduct undercover
operations to allow for effective prosecution.
Additionally, this agreement will enhance our ability to identify, target and investigate Consolidated and Regional
Priority Organization Targets, as well as target and investigate major drug trafficking and money laundering
organizations.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This position is funded in the adopted FY 18/19 budget and allows the Town to continue to be reimbursed by
HIDTA grant funding.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to (adopt or deny) Resolution No. (R)18-32, authorizing and approving a task force agreement between the
Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and the Town of Oro Valley for the participation of one (1) Oro Valley police
officer position detailed to the DEA Tucson HIDTA Task Force.
Attachments
(R)18-32 DEA HIDTA
IGA DEA HIDTA
C:\Windows\TEMP\BCL Technologies \easyPDF 7 \@BCL@0822751C\@BCL@0822751C.docx
RESOLUTION NO. (R)18-32
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING A
STATE AND LOCAL HIDTA TASK FORCE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
(“DEA”) AND THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY (“TOWN”) FOR THE
PARTICIPATION OF ONE (1) ORO VALLEY POLICE OFFICER
IN THE TUCSON HIDTA TASK FORCE
WHEREAS, pursuant to A.R.S. § 11-952, the Town is authorized to enter into agreements
for joint and cooperative action to include the Agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit “A”,
with the DEA; and
WHEREAS, the Town is authorized to establish and maintain the Oro Valley Police
Department, pursuant to A.R.S. § 9-240 (B)(12); and
WHEREAS, the Town wishes to enter into a Task Force Agreement with the DEA to assist
the DEA in drug trafficking interdiction, gathering and reporting data relating to narcotics
and dangerous drugs and undercover operations related illegal activity detrimental to the
health and general welfare of the residents of the Town and the State of Arizona; and
WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the Town to enter into the State and Local HIDTA
Task Force Agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this
reference, in order to set forth the terms and conditions to provide for the health, safety and
welfare of the residents of the Town of Oro Valley and the State of Arizona.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of
Oro Valley, that:
SECTION 1. The State and Local HIDTA Task Force Agreement attached hereto as
Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference , between the Drug Enforcement
Administration and the Town of Oro Valley for participation of one (1) Oro Valley Police
Officer in the Phoenix HIDTA Task Force (Officer working in the DEA Tucson Office) is
authorized and approved.
SECTION 2. The Chief of Police and other administrative officials of the Town of Oro
Valley are hereby authorized to take such steps as necessary to execute and implement the
terms of the Agreement.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley,
Arizona, this 5th day of September, 2018.
C:\Windows\TEMP\BCL Technologies \easyPDF 7 \@BCL@0822751C\@BCL@0822751C.docx
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
Dr. Satish I. Hiremath, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM :
Michael Standish, Town Clerk Tobin Sidles, Legal Services Director
Date: Date:
C:\Windows\TEMP\BCL Technologies \easyPDF 7 \@BCL@0822751C\@BCL@0822751C.docx
EXHIBIT “A”
2019 Oro Valley PD - Phoenix HIDTA Agreement Page 1
STATE AND LOCAL HIDTA TASK FORCE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
AND
ORO VALLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT
This agreement is made this 1st day of October, 2018, between the United States
Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration (hereinafter "DEA"), and the
Oro Valley Police Department (hereinafter "OVPD"). The DEA is authorized to enter
into this cooperative agreement concerning the use and abuse of controlled substances
under the provisions of 21 U.S.C. § 873.
Whereas there is evidence that trafficking in narcotics and dangerous drugs exists in the
State of Arizona and that such illegal activity has a substantial and detrimental effect on
the health and general welfare of the people of the State of Arizona, the parties hereto
agree to the following:
1. The DEA Phoenix HIDTA Task Force (Officer working in the DEA Tucson Office)
will perform the activities and duties described below:
a. disrupt the illicit drug traffic in the State of Arizona area by immobilizing targeted
violators and trafficking organizations;
b. gather and report intelligence data relating to trafficking in narcotics and
dangerous drugs; and
c. conduct undercover operations where appropriate and engage in other traditional
methods of investigation in order that the task force's activities will result in
effective prosecution before the courts of the United States and the State of
Arizona.
2. To accomplish the objectives of the DEA Phoenix HIDTA Task Force (Officer
working in the DEA Tucson Office), the OVPD agrees to detail one (1) experienced
Officer to the Task Force for a period of not less than two years. During this period
of assignment, the OVPD Officer will be under the direct supervision and control of
DEA supervisory personnel assigned to the Task Force.
3. The OVPD Officer assigned to the Task Force shall adhere to all DEA policies and
procedures. Failure to adhere to DEA policies and procedures shall be grounds for
dismissal from the Task Force.
4. The OVPD Officer assigned to the Task Force shall be deputized as Task Force
Officers of DEA pursuant to 21 USC 878.
2019 Oro Valley PD - Phoenix HIDTA Agreement Page 2
5. To accomplish the objectives of the DEA Phoenix HIDTA Task Force (Officer
working in the DEA Tucson Office), DEA will assign nine (9) Special Agents to the
Task Force. HIDTA will also, subject to the availability of annually appropriated
funds or any continuing resolution thereof, provide necessary funds and equipment to
support the activities of the DEA Special Agents and the OVPD Officer assigned to
the Task Force. This support will include: office space, office supplies travel funds,
funds for the purchase of evidence and information, investigative equipment, training
and other support items.
6. During the period of assignment to the DEA HIDTA Task Force, the OVPD will
remain responsible for establishing the salaries and benefits, including overtime, of
the OVPD Officer assigned to the Task Force and for making all payments due them.
HIDTA will, subject to availability of funds, reimburse the OVPD for overtime
payments made by it to the one (1) OVPD Officer assigned to the DEA HIDTA Task
Force for overtime, up to a sum equivalent to 25 percent of the salary of a GS-12,
Step 1 law enforcement officer general schedule locality pay tables, rest of the United
States table (currently $18,34375), per officer. Note: Task Force Officers overtime
“Shall not include any costs for benefits, such as retirement, FICA, and other
expenses.”
7. In no event will the OVPD charge any indirect cost rate to DEA for the
administration or implementation of this agreement.
8. The OVPD shall maintain on a current basis complete and accurate records and
accounts of all obligations and expenditures of funds under this agreement in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and instructions provided
by DEA to facilitate on-site inspection and auditing of such records and accounts.
9. The OVPD shall permit and have readily available for examination and auditing by
DEA, the United States Department of Justice, the Comptroller General of the United
States and any of their duly authorized agents and representatives, any and all
records, documents, accounts, invoices, receipts or expenditures relating to this
agreement. The OVPD shall maintain all such reports and records until all litigation,
claim, audits and examinations are completed and resolved or for a period of three (3)
years after termination of this agreement, whichever is sooner.
10. The OVPD shall comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, and
all requirements imposed by or pursuant to the regulations of the United States
Department of Justice implementing those laws, 28 C.F.R. Part 42, Subparts C, F, G,
H and I.
11. The OVPD agrees that an authorized Officer or employee will execute and return to
DEA the attached OJP Form 4061/6, Certification Regarding Lobbying; Debarment,
suspension and Other Responsibility Matters; and drug-Free Workplace
Requirements. The OVPD acknowledges that this agreement will not take effect and
no federal funds will be awarded until the completed certification is received.
2019 Oro Valley PD - Phoenix HIDTA Agreement Page 3
12. When issuing statements, press releases requests for proposals, bid solicitations and
other documents describing projects or programs funded in whole or part with federal
money, the OVPD shall clearly state: (1) percentage of the total cost of the program
or project which will be financed with federal money and (2) the dollar amount of
federal funds for the program or project.
13. The OVPD understands and agrees that HIDTA will provide the OVPD Task Force
Officer with vehicles suitable for surveillance. HIDTA through DEA will furnish
mobile radios for installation in the HIDTA Task Force vehicles and HIDTA will
assume the cost of installation and removal. HIDTA will be financially responsible
for the purchase of fuel for the leased vehicles and for providing routine maintenance,
i.e., oil changes, lubes and minor tune-ups via the HIDTA lease contractor. DEA and
HIDTA procedures for reporting and investigating automobile accidents involving
Official Government Vehicles (OGVs)-HIDTA lease vehicles shall apply to accidents
involving the leased vehicles furnished to the OVPD personnel, in addition to
whatever accident reporting requirements the OVPD may have.
14. While on duty and acting on task force business, the OVPD Officer assigned to the
HIDTA Task Force shall be subject to all DEA and federal government rules,
regulations and procedures governing the use of OGVs for home to work
transportation and for personal business. The HIDTA Executive Committee
acknowledges that the United States is liable for the actions of Task Force Officers,
while on duty and acting within the scope of their federal employment, to the extent
permitted by the Federal Torts Claim Act.
15. The term of this agreement shall be effective from the date in paragraph number one
until September 30, 2019. This agreement may be terminated by either party on 30
days advance written notice. Billing for all outstanding obligations must be received
by DEA within 90 days of the date of termination of this agreement. HIDTA will be
responsible only for obligations incurred by OVPD during the term of this agreement.
For the Drug Enforcement Administration:
________________________________________ Date: ____________
Douglas W. Coleman
Special Agent in Charge
For the Oro Valley Police Department:
_______________________________________ Date: ____________
Daniel G. Sharp
Chief of Police
2019 Oro Valley PD - Phoenix HIDTA Agreement Page 4
PASSED and ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, this
_____ day of _____________, 2018.
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY:
_______________________________________ Date: ____________
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________________ Date: ___________
Town Attorney
ATTEST:
_______________________________________ Date: ___________
Town Clerk
Town Council Regular Session F.
Meeting Date:09/05/2018
Requested by: Daniel G. Sharp Submitted By:Catherine Hendrix, Police Department
Department:Police Department
Information
SUBJECT:
Resolution No. (R)18-33, authorizing and approving a task force agreement between the Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA) and the Town of Oro Valley for the participation of two (2) Oro Valley police officers in the
DEA Tucson Task Force
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
A request is being made to enter into an agreement with the DEA for the participation of two (2) Oro Valley police
officers in the DEA Tucson Task Force.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
If approved, this agreement will provide for continued participation in these cooperative efforts to disrupt illicit drug
trafficking in the State of Arizona, gather and report intelligence data related to drug trafficking, and conduct
undercover operations to allow for effective prosecution.
Additionally, this agreement will enhance our ability to identify, target and investigate Consolidated and Regional
Priority Organization Targets, as well as target and investigate major drug trafficking and money laundering
organizations.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The related expenses are included in the Adopted Budget for FY 2018/19.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to (adopt or deny) Resolution No. (R)18-33, authorizing and approving a task force agreement between the
Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and the Town of Oro Valley for the participation of two (2) Oro Valley police
officers in the DEA Tucson Task Force.
Attachments
(R)18-33 DEA Task Force
IGA DEA
C:\Windows\TEMP\BCL Technologies \easyPDF 7 \@BCL@6C0CF61F\@BCL@6C0CF61F.doc
RESOLUTION NO. (R)18-33
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING A
PROGRAM FUNDED STATE AND LOCAL TASK FORCE
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE DRUG ENFORCEMENT
ADMINISTRATION (“DEA”) AND THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
(“TOWN”) FOR THE PARTICIPATION OF TWO (2) ORO
VALLEY POLICE OFFICER S IN THE TUCSON TASK FORCE
WHEREAS, pursuant to A.R.S. § 11-952, the Town is authorized to enter into agreements
for joint and cooperative action to include the Agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit “A”,
with the DEA; and
WHEREAS, the Town is authorized to establish and maintain the Oro Valley Police
Department, pursuant to A.R.S. § 9-240 (B)(12); and
WHEREAS, the Town wishes to enter into a Task Force Agreement with the DEA to
assist the DEA in drug trafficking interdiction, gathering and reporting data relating to
narcotics and dangerous drugs and undercover operations related illegal activity
detrimental to the health and general welfare of the residents of the Town and the State of
Arizona; and
WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the Town to enter into the Program Funded State
and Local Task Force Agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein
by this reference, in order to set forth the terms and conditions to provide for the health,
safety and welfare of the residents of the Town of Oro Valley and the State of Arizona .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council of the Town
of Oro Valley, that:
SECTION 1. The Program Funded State and Local Task Force Agreement attached
hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference , between the Drug
Enforcement Administration and the Town of Oro Valley for participation of two (2) Oro
Valley Police Officers in the Tucson Task Force is authorized and approved.
SECTION 2. The Chief of Police and other administrative officials of the Town of Oro
Valley are hereby authorized to take such steps as necessary to execute and implement
the terms of the Agreement.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley,
Arizona, this 5th day of September, 2018.
C:\Windows\TEMP\BCL Technologies \easyPDF 7 \@BCL@6C0CF61F\@BCL@6C0CF61F.doc
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
Dr. Satish I. Hiremath, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM :
Michael Standish, Town Clerk Tobin Sidles, Legal Services Director
Date: Date:
C:\Windows\TEMP\BCL Technologies \easyPDF 7 \@BCL@6C0CF61F\@BCL@6C0CF61F.doc
EXHIBIT “A”
2019 Oro Valley PD - Tucson Program-Funded Agreement 1
PROGRAM-FUNDED STATE AND LOCAL TASK FORCE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
AND
ORO VALLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT
This agreement is made this 1st day of October, 2018, between the United States Department of
Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration (hereinafter “DEA”), and Oro Valley Police
Department (hereinafter “OVPD”). The DEA is authorized to enter into this cooperative
agreement concerning the use and abuse of controlled substances under the provisions of 21
U.S.C. § 873.
WHEREAS there is evidence that trafficking in narcotics and dangerous drugs exists throughout
Arizona, and that such illegal activity has a substantial and detrimental effect on the health and
general welfare of the people of the State of Arizona, the parties hereto agree to the following:
1. The DEA Tucson Task Force will perform the activities and duties described below:
a. disrupt the illicit drug traffic in the State of Arizona by immobilizing targeted
violators and trafficking organizations;
b. gather and report intelligence data relating to trafficking in narcotics and dangerous
drugs; and,
c. conduct undercover operations where appropriate and engage in other traditional
methods of investigation in order that the Task Force’s activities will result in
effective prosecution before the courts of the United States and the State of Arizona.
2. To accomplish the objectives of the DEA Tucson Task Force, the OVPD agrees to detail
two (2) experienced Officers to the DEA Tucson Task Force, for a period of not less than
two years. During this period of assignment, the OVPD Officers will be under the direct
supervision and control of DEA supervisory personnel assigned to the Task Force.
3. The OVPD Officers assigned to the Task Force shall adhere to DEA policies and
procedures. Failure to adhere to DEA policies and procedures shall be grounds for
dismissal from the Task Force.
4. The OVPD Officers assigned to the Task Force shall be deputized as a Task Force
Officers of DEA pursuant to 21 U.S.C. §878.
2019 Oro Valley PD - Tucson Program-Funded Agreement 2
5. To accomplish the objectives of the DEA Tucson Task Force, the OVPD agrees to detail
two (2) experienced Officers to the DEA Tucson Task Force. DEA will assign four (4)
Special Agents to the Task Force. DEA will also, subject to the availability of annually
appropriated funds or any continuing resolution thereof, provide necessary funds and
equipment to support the activities of the DEA Special Agents and OVPD Officers
assigned to the Task Force. This support will include: office space, office supplies,
travel funds, funds for the purchase of evidence and information, investigative
equipment, training, and other support items.
6. During the period of assignment to the DEA Tucson Task Force, the OVPD will remain
responsible for establishing the salary and benefits, including overtime, of the OVPD
Officers assigned to the Task Force, and for making all payments due them. DEA will,
subject to availability of funds, reimburse the OVPD for overtime payments made by it to
the OVPD Officers assigned to the DEA Tucson Task Force for overtime, up to a sum
equivalent to 25 percent of the salary of a GS-12, Step 1, law enforcement officer general
schedule locality pay tables, rest of the United States table (currently $18,343.75), per
officer. “Note: Task Force Officers Overtime shall not include any costs for benefits,
such as retirement, FICA, and other expenses.”
7. In no event will the OVPD charge any indirect cost rate to DEA for the administration or
implementation of this agreement.
8. The OVPD shall maintain on a current basis complete and accurate records and accounts
of all obligations and expenditures of funds under this agreement in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles and instructions provided by DEA to facilitate
on-site inspection and auditing of such records and accounts.
9. The OVPD shall permit and have readily available for examination and auditing by DEA,
the United States Department of Justice, the Comptroller General of the United States,
and any of their duly authorized agents and representatives, any and all records,
documents, accounts, invoices, receipts or expenditures relating to this agreement. The
OVPD shall maintain all such reports and records until all litigation, claim, audits and
examinations are completed and resolved, or for a period of three (3) after termination of
this agreement, whichever is later.
10. The OVPD shall comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, and all
requirements imposed by or pursuant to the regulations of the United States Department
of Justice implementing those laws, 28 C.F.R. Part 42, Subparts C, F, G, H, and I.
2019 Oro Valley PD - Tucson Program-Funded Agreement 3
11. The OVPD agrees that an authorized Officers or employee will execute and return to
DEA the attached OJP Form 4061/6, Certification Regarding Lobbying: Debarment,
Suspension and Other Responsibility Matters; and Drug-Free Workplace Requirements.
The OVPD acknowledges that this agreement will not take effect and no Federal funds
will be awarded to the OVPD by DEA until the completed certification is received.
12. When issuing statements, press releases, requests for proposals, bid solicitations, and
other documents describing projects or programs funded in whole or in part with federal
money, the OVPD shall clearly state: (1) the percentage of the total cost of the program
or project which will be financed with Federal money; and, (2) the dollar amount of
Federal funds for the project or program.
13. The term of this agreement shall be effective from the date in paragraph number one (1)
until September 30, 2019. This agreement may be terminated by either party on thirty
days’ advance written notice. Billings for all outstanding obligations must be received by
DEA within 90 days of the date of termination of this agreement. DEA will be
responsible only for obligations incurred by OVPD during the term of this agreement.
For the Drug Enforcement Administration:
________________________________________ Date: ____________
Douglas W. Coleman
Special Agent in Charge
For the Oro Valley Police Department:
_______________________________________ Date: ____________
Daniel G. Sharp
Chief of Police
Attachments
2019 Oro Valley PD - Tucson Program-Funded Agreement 4
PASSED and ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley,
Arizona, this _____ day of _____________, 2018.
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY:
_______________________________________ Date: ____________
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________________ Date: ___________
Town Attorney
ATTEST:
_______________________________________ Date: ___________
Town Clerk
Town Council Regular Session G.
Meeting Date:09/05/2018
Requested by: Jon Hawbaker
Submitted By:Jon Hawbaker, Community Development & Public Works
Department:Community Development & Public Works
Information
SUBJECT:
Resolution No. (R)18-34, repealing the Town of Oro Valley Public Works Transit Division Prevention of Alcohol
Misuse and Prohibited Drug Use Policy, and replacing with Transit Division Drug and Alcohol Policy
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of Resolution No. (R)18-34. Approval of this policy will allow the Town of Oro Valley
Dial-a-Ride service to remain in compliance with the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Transportation Workplace
Drug and Alcohol Testing Program.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The Town of Oro Valley Transit Division Drug and Alcohol Policy is updated to comply with the FTA Final Rule, Part
40. Excess and unnecessary verbiage about methods of testing, safeguarding the validity of tests, recordkeeping
requirements, effects of alcohol misuse and employee education and training were removed. In addition, several
appendices that prescribe testing form usage and acknowledgement were removed. This information and these
forms are now included in a Standard Operating Procedure per recommendations from the Federal Transit
Administration.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
The Transit Services Division Prevention of Alcohol Misuse and Prohibited Drug Use Policy is being
repealed and replaced with the Transit Division Drug and Alcohol Policy to conform with the Federal
Transit Administration compliance review that was conducted in April 2018.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Adopting this resolution will have no fiscal impact, it is cost neutral.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to (approve/deny) Resolution No. (R)18-34, authorizing and approving The Town of Oro Valley Transit
Division Drug and Alcohol Policy.
Or
I move to...
Attachments
(R)18-34 Drug and Alcohol Policy Update
Policy
C:\Windows\TEMP\BCL Technologies \easyPDF 7 \@BCL@E819EDC3\@BCL@E819EDC3.doc Town of Oro Valley Attorney’s Office/ca/032112
RESOLUTION NO. (R)18-34
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS TRANSIT
SERVICES DIVISION , PREVENTION OF ALCOHOL MISUSE AND
PROHIBITED DRUG USE POLICY
WHEREAS, pursuant to 49 CFR 655 et seq., the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) has the
authority to establish programs to be implemented by employers that receive FTA funding that
are designed to help prevent accidents, injuries and fatalities res ulting from the misuse of alcohol
and use of prohibited drugs by employees who perform safety-sensitive functions; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to A.R.S. § 9-240, the Town has the authority to provide policies and
procedures, and the Town desires to amend the To wn of Oro Valley Development and
Infrastructure Services Department’s Transit Services Division Prevention of Alcohol Misuse
and Prohibited Drug Use Policy “(Policy”) to remain compliant with the FTA Transportation
Workplace Drug and Alcohol Testing Progra m; and
WHEREAS, the amendments to the Town’s Policy, include removing excess and unnecessary
verbiage about methods of testing, safeguarding the validity of tests, record keeping
requirements, effects of alcohol misuse and employee education and training; and
WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the Town to amend the Policy, attached hereto as Exhibit
“A”, to reflect the changes.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro
Valley, Arizona that the Town of Oro Valley Community Development and Public Works
Transit Services Division Prevention of Alcohol Misuse and Prohibited Drug Use Policy,
attached hereto as Exhibit “A”, is hereby approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and any other administrative officials of the
Town of Oro Valley are hereby authorized to take such steps as are necessary to execute and
implement the terms of the Policy.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley,
Arizona, this 5th day of September, 2018.
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
Dr. Satish I. Hiremath, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Michael Standish, Town Clerk Tobin Sidles, Legal Services Director
Date Date
Exhibit “A”
Page 1 of 10
Town of Oro Valley
Transit Services Division
Adopted: September 5, 2018
Drug and Alcohol Policy
Page 2 of 10
Table of Contents
1. Purpose of Policy ................................................................................................................................. 3
2. Covered Employees ............................................................................................................................. 3
3. Prohibited Behavior ............................................................................................................................ 4
4. Consequences for Violations ............................................................................................................... 4
5. Circumstances for Testing ................................................................................................................... 5
6. Testing Procedures .............................................................................................................................. 7
7. Test Refusals........................................................................................................................................ 7
8. Voluntary Self-Referral ........................................................................................................................ 8
9. Prescription Drug Use ......................................................................................................................... 8
10. Contact Person .................................................................................................................................... 9
Attachment A: Covered Positions ............................................................................................................... 10
Page 3 of 10
1. Purpose of Policy
This policy complies with 49 CFR Part 655, as amended and 49 CFR Part 40, as amended. Copies of
Parts 655 and 40 are available in the drug and alcohol program manager’s office and can be found on the
internet at the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Drug and Alcohol Program website
http://transit-safety.fta.dot.gov/DrugAndAlcohol/.
All covered employees are required to submit to drug and alcohol tests as a condition of employment in
accordance with 49 CFR Part 655.
Portions of this policy are not FTA-mandated, but reflect Town of Oro Valley Transit Services Division’s
policy. These additional provisions are identified by bold text.
In addition, DOT has published 49 CFR Part 32, implementing the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988,
which requires the establishment of drug-free workplace policies and the reporting of certain drug-related
offenses to the FTA.
All Town of Oro Valley Transit Services Division employees are subject to the provisions of the
Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988.
The unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensation, possession or use of a controlled substance is
prohibited in the covered workplace. An employee who is convicted of any criminal drug statute for a
violation occurring in the workplace shall notify a Transit Crew Leader no later than five days after such
conviction.
2. Covered Employees
This policy applies to every person, including an applicant or transferee, who performs or will perform a
“safety-sensitive function” as defined in Part 655, section 655.4.
You are a covered employee if you perform any of the following:
Operating a revenue service vehicle, in or out of revenue service
Operating a non-revenue vehicle requiring a commercial driver’s license
Controlling movement or dispatch of a revenue service vehicle
Maintaining (including repairs, overhaul and rebuilding) of a revenue service vehicle or
equipment used in revenue service
Carrying a firearm for security purposes
See Attachment A for a list of covered positions by job title.
Page 4 of 10
3. Prohibited Behavior
Use of illegal drugs is prohibited at all times. All covered employees are prohibited from reporting for
duty or remaining on duty any time there is a quantifiable presence of a prohibited drug in the body at or
above the minimum thresholds defined in Part 40. Prohibited drugs include:
marijuana
cocaine
phencyclidine (PCP)
opioids
amphetamines
All covered employees are prohibited from performing or continuing to perform safety-sensitive functions
while having an alcohol concentration of 0.04 or greater.
All covered employees are prohibited from consuming alcohol while performing safety-sensitive job
functions or while on-call to perform safety-sensitive job functions. If an on-call employee has consumed
alcohol, they must acknowledge the use of alcohol at the time that they are called to report for duty. If the
on-call employee claims the ability to perform his or her safety-sensitive function, he or she must take an
alcohol test with a result of less than 0.02 prior to performance.
All covered employees are prohibited from consuming alcohol within four (4) hours prior to the
performance of safety-sensitive job functions.
All covered employees are prohibited from consuming alcohol for eight (8) hours following involvement
in an accident or until he or she submits to the post-accident drug and alcohol test, whichever occurs first.
4. Consequences for Violations
Following a positive drug or alcohol (BAC at or above 0.04) test result or test refusal, the employee will
be immediately removed from safety-sensitive duty and referred to a Substance Abuse Professional.
Following a BAC of 0.02 or greater, but less than 0.04, the employee will be immediately removed from
safety-sensitive duties for at least eight hours unless a retest results in the employee’s alcohol
concentration being less than 0.02.
Zero Tolerance
Per Town of Oro Valley Transit Services Division policy, any employee who tests positive for drugs or
alcohol (BAC at or above 0.04) or refuses to test will be referred to a Substance Abuse Professional
(SAP) and terminated from employment.
Page 5 of 10
5. Circumstances for Testing
Pre-Employment Testing
A negative pre-employment drug test result is required before an employee can first perform safety-
sensitive functions. If a pre-employment test is cancelled, the individual will be required to undergo
another test and successfully pass with a verified negative result before performing safety-sensitive
functions.
If a covered employee has not performed a safety-sensitive function for 90 or more consecutive calendar
days, and has not been in the random testing pool during that time, the employee must take and pass a
pre-employment test before he or she can return to a safety-sensitive function.
A covered employee or applicant who has previously failed or refused a DOT pre-employment drug
and/or alcohol test must provide proof of having successfully completed a referral, evaluation, and
treatment plan meeting DOT requirements.
Reasonable Suspicion Testing
All covered employees shall be subject to a drug and/or alcohol test when Town of Oro Valley Transit
Services Division has reasonable suspicion to believe that the covered employee has used a prohibited
drug and/or engaged in alcohol misuse. A reasonable suspicion referral for testing will be made by a
trained supervisor or other trained company official on the basis of specific, contemporaneous, articulable
observations concerning the appearance, behavior, speech, or body odors of the covered employee.
Covered employees may be subject to reasonable suspicion drug testing any time while on duty. Covered
employees may be subject to reasonable suspicion alcohol testing while the employee is performing
safety-sensitive functions, just before the employee is to perform safety-sensitive functions, or just after
the employee has ceased performing such functions.
Post-Accident Testing
Covered employees shall be subject to post-accident drug and alcohol testing under the following
circumstances:
Fatal Accidents
As soon as practicable following an accident involving the loss of a human life, drug and alcohol
tests will be conducted on each surviving covered employee operating the public transportation
vehicle at the time of the accident. In addition, any other covered employee whose performance
could have contributed to the accident, as determined by Town of Oro Valley Transit Services
Division using the best information available at the time of the decision, will be tested.
Non-fatal Accidents
Page 6 of 10
As soon as practicable following an accident not involving the loss of a human life, drug and
alcohol tests will be conducted on each covered employee operating the public transportation
vehicle at the time of the accident if at least one of the following conditions is met unless the
covered employee can be completely discounted as a contributing factor to the accident :
(1) The accident results in injuries requiring immediate medical treatment away from the
scene,
(2) One or more vehicles incurs disabling damage and must be towed away from the
scene.
In addition, any other covered employee whose performance could have contributed to the
accident, as determined by Town of Oro Valley Transit Services Division using the best
information available at the time of the decision, will be tested.
A covered employee subject to post-accident testing must remain readily available, or it is considered a
refusal to test. Nothing in this section shall be construed to require the delay of necessary medical
attention for the injured following an accident or to prohibit a covered employee from leaving the
scene of an accident for the period necessary to obtain assistance in responding to the accident or to
obtain necessary emergency medical care.
Random Testing
Random drug and alcohol tests are unannounced and unpredictable, and the dates for administering
random tests are spread reasonably throughout the calendar year. Random testing will be conducted at all
times of the day when safety-sensitive functions are performed.
Testing rates will meet or exceed the minimum annual percentage rate set each year by the FTA
administrator. The current year testing rates can be viewed online at
www.transportation.gov/odapc/random-testing-rates.
The selection of employees for random drug and alcohol testing will be made by a scientifically valid
method, such as a random number table or a computer-based random number generator. Under the
selection process used, each covered employee will have an equal chance of being tested each time
selections are made.
A covered employee may only be randomly tested for alcohol misuse while the employee is performing
safety-sensitive functions, just before the employee is to perform safety-sensitive functions, or just after
the employee has ceased performing such functions. A covered employee may be randomly tested for
prohibited drug use anytime while on duty.
Each covered employee who is notified of selection for random drug or random alcohol testing must
immediately proceed to the designated testing site.
Random Testing – End of Shift
Page 7 of 10
Random testing may occur anytime an employee is on duty so long as the employee is notified prior to
the end of the shift. Employees who provide advance, verifiable notice of scheduled medical or child care
commitments will be random drug tested no later than three hours before the end of their shift and random
alcohol tested no later than 30 minutes before the end of their shift. Verifiable documentation of a
previously scheduled medical or child care commitment, for the period immediately following an
employee’s shift, must be provided at least one hour before the end of the shift.
6. Testing Procedures
All FTA drug and alcohol testing will be conducted in accordance with 49 CFR Part 40, as amended.
Dilute Urine Specimen
If there is a negative dilute test result, Town of Oro Valley Transit Services Division will accept the
test result and there will be no retest, unless the creatinine concentration of a negative dilute specimen
was greater than or equal to 2 mg/dL, but less than or equal to 5 mg/dL.
Dilute negative results with a creatinine level greater than or equal to 2 mg/dL but less than or equal to 5
mg/dL require an immediate recollection under direct observation (see 49 CFR Part 40, section 40.67).
Split Specimen Test
In the event of a verified positive test result, or a verified adulterated or substituted result, the employee
can request that the split specimen be tested at a second laboratory. Town of Oro Valley Transit Services
Division guarantees that the split specimen test will be conducted in a timely fashion. The Town of Oro
Valley will pay for the test.
7. Test Refusals
As a covered employee, you have refused to test if you:
(1) Fail to appear for any test (except a pre-employment test) within a reasonable time, as
determined by Town of Oro Valley Transit Services Division.
(2) Fail to remain at the testing site until the testing process is complete. An employee who leaves
the testing site before the testing process commences for a pre-employment test has not refused
to test.
(3) Fail to attempt to provide a breath or urine specimen. An employee who does not provide a
urine or breath specimen because he or she has left the testing site before the testing process
commenced for a pre-employment test has not refused to test.
(4) In the case of a directly-observed or monitored urine drug collection, fail to permit monitoring
or observation of your provision of a specimen.
(5) Fail to provide a sufficient quantity of urine or breath without a valid medical explanation.
Page 8 of 10
(6) Fail or decline to take a second test as directed by the collector or Town of Oro Valley Transit
Services Division for drug testing.
(7) Fail to undergo a medical evaluation as required by the MRO or Town of Oro Valley Transit
Services Division’s Designated Employer Representative (DER).
(8) Fail to cooperate with any part of the testing process.
(9) Fail to follow an observer’s instructions to raise and lower clothing and turn around during a
directly-observed test.
(10) Possess or wear a prosthetic or other device used to tamper with the collection process.
(11) Admit to the adulteration or substitution of a specimen to the collector or MRO.
(12) Refuse to sign the certification at Step 2 of the Alcohol Testing Form (ATF).
(13) Fail to remain readily available following an accident.
As a covered employee, if the MRO reports that you have a verified adulterated or substituted test result,
you have refused to take a drug test.
As a covered employee, if you refuse to take a drug and/or alcohol test, you incur the same consequences
as testing positive and will be immediately removed from performing safety-sensitive functions, and
referred to a SAP.
8. Voluntary Self-Referral
Any employee who has a drug and/or alcohol abuse problem and has not been selected for
reasonable suspicion, random or post-accident testing or has not refused a drug or alcohol test may
voluntarily refer her or himself to their direct supervisor and/or Human Resources department,
who will refer the individual to a substance abuse counselor for evaluation and treatment.
The substance abuse counselor will evaluate the employee and make a specific recommendation
regarding the appropriate treatment. Employees are encouraged to voluntarily seek professional
substance abuse assistance before any substance use or dependence affects job performance.
Any safety-sensitive employee who admits to a drug and/or alcohol problem will immediately be
removed from his/her safety-sensitive function and will not be allowed to perform such function
until successful completion of a prescribed rehabilitation program.
9. Prescription Drug Use
The appropriate use of legally prescribed drugs and non-prescription medications is not prohibited.
However, the use of any substance which carries a warning label that indicates that mental
functioning, motor skills, or judgment may be adversely affected must be reported to a Transit
Crew Leader. Medical advice should be sought, as appropriate, while taking such medication and
before performing safety-sensitive duties.
Page 9 of 10
10. Contact Person
For questions about Town of Oro Valley Transit Services Division’s anti-drug and alcohol misuse
program, contact Jon Hawbaker, Transit Services Division, to answer questions.
Page 10 of 10
Attachment A: Covered Positions
1. Transit Crew Leaders
2. Dispatchers
3. Transit Specialists
4. Transit Drivers
Town Council Regular Session H.
Meeting Date:09/05/2018
Requested by: Bayer Vella, Community and Economic Development
Submitted By:Milini Simms, Community and Economic Development
Case Number: OV1701671
Information
SUBJECT:
Request for approval of a Final Plat for a residential subdivision, located on the northeast corner of La Cañada Drive
and Moore Road
RECOMMENDATION:
The subdivision design was previously approved. As such staff recommends approval of this
primarily administrative function.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The purpose of this request is to consider a Final Plat for a proposed residential subdivision, located on the
northeast corner of La Cañada Drive and Moore Road (Attachment 1). Final plat review is primarily an
administrative function as the design was previously approved.
The proposed Final Plat (Attachment 2) consists of 19 detached single-family residential lots on approximately 5.7
acres. The subdivision design provides two access points, one off La Cañada Drive and the other off Moore Road,
and preserves approximately 1.3 acres of natural open space.
The Final Plat has been reviewed and meets Town requirements, and conforms to the approved rezoning and Final
Site Plan designs.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
The Final Plat requires Town Council approval prior to being officially recorded with Pima County.
In 2013 and 2014, the Town Council approved a Minor General Plan Amendment and associated rezoning for the
subject property. Since then, the Final Site Plan has been administratively approved because it conforms to the
design and meets all the conditions of approval discussed during the rezoning process.
Proposed Improvements:
Approximately 5.7 acres subdivided into 19 single-family residential lots.
Minimum lot size: 5,040 s.f.
Average lot size: 5,841 s.f.
Two access points.
Maximum building height: 30 feet, 2 stories with single-story restrictions on lots 14-16.
Approximately 1.3 acres (22%) of preserved natural open space.
A public trail located on the northeast corner of the site.
Previous Approvals:
1987: Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development, Commercial (C-1) zoning
2013: General Plan Amendment to Medium Density Residential (MDR) approved by Town Council
2014: Rezoning approved by Town Council
2018: Final Site Plan approved by Town staff
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to APPROVE the Final Plat for a residential subdivision located at the intersection of La Cañada Drive and
Moore Road, based on the finding that it meets Town requirements.
OR
I MOVE to DENY the Final Plat for a residential subdivision located at the intersection of La Cañada Drive and
Moore Road, based on the finding that ___________________.
Attachments
ATTACHMENT 1- LOCATION MAP
ATTACHMENT 2 - FINAL PLAT
Residential subdivision on La Cañada Dr. and Moore Rd.
Location Map
OV1701671La Cañada DriveYellow outline –subject property
Moore Road
Town Council Regular Session I.
Meeting Date:09/05/2018
Requested by: Bayer Vella, Community and Economic Development
Submitted By:Milini Simms, Community and Economic Development
Case Number: OV1802048
Information
SUBJECT:
Request for approval of a Block Plat for the Saguaros Viejos residential subdivision, located near the northwest
corner of La Cholla Boulevard and Naranja Drive
RECOMMENDATION:
This request is primarily an administrative action to subdivide the land into two "large" blocks to sell to
developers. Detailed subdivision final plats for each block will be required and presented to Town Council prior to
the sale of homes. As such, staff recommends approval.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The purpose of this request is to consider a proposed Block Plat (Attachment 1) for the Saguaros Viejos residential
subdivision, located near the northwest corner of La Cholla Boulevard and Naranja Drive (Attachment 2). The Block
Plat divides the 143 acre property into two (2) blocks, each representing a previously approved phase of the
development, specifically:
Block 1 represents Phase 1 - a Conceptual Site Plan for 44 lots on 55 acres was approved in April 2018
Block 2 represents Phase 2 - a Rezoning for 178 lots on 85 acres was approved in April 2018
The proposed Block Plat conforms to the designs and stipulations of the previously approved plans, including
dedication of a 50' public right-of-way along Glover Road.
The purpose of the Block Plat is to sell each block (phase) to different developers - not individual homeowners.
Block 1 (Phase 1) is being developed by Meritage Homes and upon approval, Block 2 (Phase 2) may
be sold. However, detailed subdivision final plats for each block reflecting the approved rezoning and site plan
designs, will be required and presented to Town Council prior to the sale of homes. As such, staff recommends
approval.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
A block plat is a legal instrument used to subdivide large areas for future sale and development. Town Council
approval of a block plat is required prior to recordation with Pima County. However, detailed subdivision final plats
will be required for each block prior to the sale of home lots.
In April 2018, the Town Council approved a conceptual site plan for Block 1 (Phase 1) and rezoning for Block 2
(Phase 2). General notes have been added to the Block Plat to assure subsequent final plats for each block are in
substantial conformance to the previously approved designs. The Block Plat also dedicates 50 feet of public right-of
-way along Glover Road.
Proposed Improvements:
Approximately 143 acres, divided into two (2) residential blocks
Block 1 (R-20 zoning) - approximately 55 acres
Block 2 (R1-7 zoning) - approximately 85 acres
Dedication of 50 foot public right-of-way along Glover Road
Previous Approvals:
2002: Annexed into the Town of Oro Valley
2007: Rezoning approved from R1-144 to R1-20
2018: Conceptual Site Plan approved for Block 1 (Phase 1)
2018: Rezoning approved for Block 2 (Phase 2) from R1-20 to R1-7
The proposed block plat is consistent with all previous approvals.
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to APPROVE the Block Plat for the Saguaros Viejos residential subdivision based on the finding it is in
conformance with all applicable Zoning Code requirements.
OR
I MOVE to DENY the Block Plat for Saguaros Viejos residential subdivision based on the finding that
__________________.
Attachments
ATTACHMENT 1 - SAGUARO VIEJOS BLOCK PLAT
ATTACHMENT 2 - LOCATION MAP
Saguaros Viejos
Location Map
OV1802048
Yellow outline –subject property La Cholla Blvd.N
Naranja Drive
Glover Road
Town Council Regular Session J.
Meeting Date:09/05/2018
Requested by: Mike Standish Submitted By:Mike Standish, Town Clerk's Office
Department:Town Clerk's Office
Information
SUBJECT:
Resolution No. (R)18-35, declaring and adopting the results of the Oro Valley Primary Election held on August 28,
2018 (Updated on 9/5/18 at 11:30 a.m.)
RECOMMENDATION:
The attached resolution declares and adopts the results of the Primary Election held on August 28, 2018. The
Election Summary Report, Votes by Precinct reports and the Statement of Votes Cast are also attached.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The Primary Election was held on August 28, 2018 to fill the Mayor's seat and three Council seats. The final
Election Summary reported the following votes cast:
Oro Valley Mayor
Hiremath, Satish 6,563
Winfield, Joe 9,242
Oro Valley Councilmembers(3 seats open)
Barrett, Melanie 8,906
Hornat, Joe 5,794
Jones-Ivey, Joyce 8,485
Nicolson, Josh 8,141
Snider, Mary 6,694
Waters, Lou 5,985
Proposition 462- Extension of the Alternative Expenditure Limitation
Yes 9,124
No 4,574
The number of votes required at the Primary Election to be declared elected was calculated by adding all of the
votes cast for all candidates for the office, dividing by the number of seats to be filled and then dividing the result of
the calculation by two and rounding to the highest whole number. In order to be declared elected as Mayor, a
candidate needed to receive 7,903 votes. To be elected as a Councilmember, candidates needed to receive
7,335 votes.
Joe Winfield, having received more than the number of votes required, has been declared elected as Mayor.
Melanie Barrett, Joyce Jones-Ivey and Josh Nicolson, each having received more than the number of votes
required, have been declared elected as Councilmembers. Because all four open seats have been filled, the
General Election scheduled for November 6, 2018 has been cancelled.
BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION:
Pursuant to ARS §16-204, for cities or towns with a population that is less than 175,000, primaries are held on the
tenth Tuesday before the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November. General elections are held on the first
Tuesday after the first Monday in November.
ARS § 16-408(D) permits the governing body to enter into an agreement with the County Board of Supervisors and
Recorder for election services. The Pima County Recorder provided election services to the Town and
the Primary Election was conducted as a polling place election.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The total cost of the Primary Election is unknown at this time. A total budget amount of $80,000 is in the Fiscal
Year 2018/2019 Election Services category of the Town Clerk's Budget. The Town will receive an invoice outlining
the expenditures for the Town's Primary Election from the Pima County Recorder and the Elections Department.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE to adopt Resolution No. (R)18-35, declaring and adopting the results of the Oro Valley Primary Election
held on August 28, 2018.
Attachments
Resolution No. (R)18-35 Primary Canvass
Canvass and Statement of Votes Cast
C:\Windows\TEMP\BCL Technologies \easyPDF 7 \@BCL@F017B712 \@BCL@F017B712.doc Town of Oro Valley Attorney’s Office/ca/032112
RESOLUTION NO. (R)18-35
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, DECLARING AND
ADOPTING THE RESULTS OF THE PRIMARY ELECTION
HELD ON AUGUST 28, 2018
WHEREAS, the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona did hold a Primary Election on the 28th
day of August, 2018, for the election of one (1) Mayoral seat and three (3)
Councilmember seats, as well as Proposition 462 - Extension of the Alternative
Expenditure Limitation; and
WHEREAS, the election returns have been presented to and have been canvassed by
the Town Council; and
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council of the Town
of Oro Valley, Pima County, Arizona, as follows:
SECTION 1. That the total number of ballots received for the Primary Election was
16,244, representing 53.4% of the registered voters.
SECTION 2. That the votes cast for the candidates for Mayor and Councilmembers and
Proposition 462 were as follows:
Oro Valley Mayor:
Hiremath, Satish 6,563
Winfield, Joe 9,242
Oro Valley Councilmembers (3 seats open)
Barrett, Melanie 8,906
Hornat, Joe 5,794
Jones-Ivey, Joyce 8,485
Nicolson, Josh 8,141
Snider, Mary 6,694
Waters, Lou 5,985
Proposition 462 – Extension of the Alternative Expenditure Limitation:
Yes 9,124
No 4,574
SECTION 3. The number of votes required at the Primary Election to be declared
elected was calculated by adding all of the votes cast for all candidates for the office,
dividing by the number of seats to be filled and then divid ing the result of the calculation
C:\Windows\TEMP\BCL Technologies \easyPDF 7 \@BCL@F017B712 \@BCL@F017B712.doc Town of Oro Valley Attorney’s Office/ca/032112
by two and rounding to the highest whole number. In order to be declared elected as
Mayor, a candidate needed to receive 7,903 votes. To be elected as a Councilmember,
candidates needed to receive 7,335 votes.
SECTION 4. Joe Winfield having received more than the number of votes required, is
hereby declared elected to the Office of Mayor and shall serve a four (4) year term
commencing November 7, 2018 to November 16, 2022.
SECTION 5. Melanie Barrett, Joyce Jones-Ivey and Josh Nicolson, each having
received more than the number of votes required, are hereby declared elected to the
Office of Councilmember and each shall serve a four (4) year term commencing
November 7, 2018 to November 16, 2022.
SECTION 6. As the Mayor seat and all three (3) Council seats have been filled, the
General Election scheduled for November 6, 2018 is hereby cancelled.
SECTION 7. Where it is necessary for the preservation of the peace, health and safety
of the Town that this Resolution become immediately operative, this resolution shall be
in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley,
Arizona this 5th day of September, 2018.
Dr. Satish I. Hiremath, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Michael Standish, Town Clerk Tobin Sidles, Legal Services Director
Date: Date:
pima county
official
canvass
primary
election
august 28, 2018
pima county elections department
6550 s. country club road
tucson, az 85756
tel. 520-724-6830
town of oro valley
Brad R. Nelson, Director
Pima County Elections
ELECTIONS DEPARTMENT
PIMA COUNTY GOVERNMENT
6550 S. COUNTRY CLUB ROAD, TUCSON, AZ 85756
(520) 724-6830 FAX (520) 724-6870
September 2, 2018
In accordance with Arizona Revised Statutes, Title16, I hereby certify the enclosed tabulation
is a full, true and correct copy of the Returns of the Primary Election held pursuant to Arizona
Constitution, Article 7 and Arizona Revised Statutes Title 16 in and for Pima County Arizona on
August 28, 2018. This tabulation includes all early ballots and verifi ed provisional ballots cast
at said election.
Respectfully submitted,
CANVASS INFORMATION
PRIMARY ELECTION
AUGUST 28, 2018
EARLY BALLOTS PROCESSED
172685 Ballots Processed
172681 Counted
4 Rejected
PROVISIONAL BALLOTS PROCESSED
4141 Ballots Received
3766 Ballots Verified
3759 Ballot Counted
375 Ballots Unverified and Uncounted
1 Rejected
6 Verified with no ballot in Provisional Envelope
CONDITIONAL BALLOTS PROCESSED
65 Ballots Received
35 Ballots Verified and Counted
30 Ballots Unverified and Uncounted
ELECTIONS DEPARTMENT
PIMA COUNTY GOVERNMENT
6550 S. COUNTRY CLUB ROAD, TUCSON, AZ 85756
July 24, 2018
(520) 724-6830 FAX (520) 724-6870
The Honorable Michele Reagan
Secretary of State
State Capitol -West Wing
1700 W. Washington
Phoenix, AZ 85007
Dear Secretary Reagan:
Purs uant to A.R.S. 16-445, the Pima County Elections Department has completed
programming and is filing a backup of the EMS Software to be used for the
August 28, 2018 Primary Election.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at (520) 724-6830.
Sincerely,
Brad R. Nelson, Director
Pima County Division of Elections
sos 05-17-2016 07/04/2018
POLITICALPARITTEST
CERTIFICATION FORM
C£NTRAL COUNT TEST
We the undersigned do hereby certify that a Test was held for the
,fa,#�
Member's Signature
Member's Signature
1£/·11--. (day)
August 28th, 2018 Primary Election /4 on the
day Of !Af (1 )+-, rx:¢1 r at
(Month) ' (Year)
and that the EVS System's precinct and
;;1:0('; fM_
(Time)
report match the printouts and the pre-audit reports. �Gl,,�4_g--/9-/g' Member's Signature
&«nt� ;;If� cfJofi
Member's Signature
Member's Signature
polling places
used for the
august 28, 2018
primary election
Official Polling Place List
9/4/2018 8:43:34 AM
Primary Election
August 28, 2018
HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS ORO VALLEY
11075 N ORACLE ROAD
LARGE MEETING ROOM
012 - PCTS 012VA:
ORO VALLEY CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE
500 W CALLE CONCORDIA
FELLOWSHIP HALL
013 - PCTS 013VA:
CATALINA COMMUNITY CENTER
16562 N ORACLE ROAD
RECREATION ROOM
024 - PCTS 024VA:
ST. ODILIA CATHOLIC CHURCH
7570 N PASEO DEL NORTE
PARISH HALL
029 - PCTS 029VA:
CHURCH OF THE APOSTLES
12111 N LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD
CHURCH
077 - PCTS 077VA:
SUN CITY ORO VALLEY -CATALINA VISTA
14055 N DEL WEBB BOULEVARD
MT. LEMMON ROOM
145 - PCTS 145VA:
THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY
SAINTS
55 W ARROWSMITH DRIVE
CULTURAL HALL
169 - PCTS 169VA:
AUSD - PAINTED SKY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
12620 N WOODBURNE AVENUE
MUSIC ROOM
172 - PCTS 172VA:
ORO VALLEY PUBLIC LIBRARY
1305 W NARANJA DRIVE
CONFERENCE MEETING ROOM
173 - PCTS 173VA:
DESERT SPRINGS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
1555 W OVERTON ROAD
SANCTUARY
187 - PCTS 187VA:
GRACE COMMUNITY COVENANT CHURCH
9755 N LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD
MULTIPURPOSE ROOM
194 - PCTS 194VA:
CASAS ADOBES BAPTIST CHURCH
10801 N LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD
PALO VERDE ROOM
200 - PCTS 200VA:
ALIVE CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP
9662 N LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD
LOBBY
202 - PCTS 202VA:
AUSD - COPPER CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
11620 N COPPER SPRING TRAIL
MUSIC ROOM
212 - PCTS 212VA:
RESURRECTION LUTHERAN CHURCH
11575 N 1ST AVENUE
OUTREACH CENTER, SUNDAY SCHOOL ROOM
216 - PCTS 216VA:
1
proposition
text
Proposal submitted by the Town Council of Oro Valley, Arizona
Official Title
A resolution proposing an extension of the alternative expenditure limitation for the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona.
Descriptive Title
Pursuant to the Arizona State Constitution, this proposal establishes an alternative expenditure limitation for the Town
of Oro Valley for the next four years. Annually, the Town Council will determine the amount of the alternative
expenditure limitation for the fiscal year after at least one public hearing. This alternative expenditure limitation
replaces the state-imposed expenditure limitation.
A “YES” vote shall have the effect of establishing an alternative expenditure limitation for the Town of Oro Valley.
A “NO” vote shall have the effect of not allowing the Town of Oro Valley to establish an alternative expenditure
limitation and to require expenditures of the Town to be limited to the state-imposed expenditure limit.
YES
NO
Propuesta sometida por el Concejo del Pueblo de Oro Valley, Arizona
Título Oficial
Una resolución proponiendo una extensión de la limitación de gastos alternativa del Pueblo de Oro Valley, Arizona.
Título Descriptivo
De acuerdo con la Constitución del Estado de Arizona, esta propuesta establece una limitación de gastos alternativa
para el Pueblo de Oro Valley para los próximos cuatro años. Anualmente, el Concejo del Pueblo determinará la
cantidad de la limitación de gastos alternativa para el año fiscal después de al menos una audiencia pública. Esta
limitación de gastos alternativa reemplaza la limitación de gastos impuesta por el estado.
Un voto “SÍ” tendrá el efecto de establecer una limitación de gastos alternativa para el pueblo de Oro Valley.
Un voto “NO” tendrá el efecto de no permitir al Pueblo de Oro Valley establecer una limitación de gastos alternativa y
de requerir que los gastos del Pueblo de Oro Valley estén limitados al límite de gastos impuesto por el estado
SÍ
NO
PROPOSITION 462
PROPOSICIÓN 462
WrITE-IN
INfOrMATION
There are no official Write-In candidates for the Town of
Oro Valley for the Primary Election held on August 28,
2018.
election
summary
E&l2a0o7c067F(s0p16.66h3b6T&a00L
RESULTS FINAL
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
STATISTICS
RUN DATE:09/02/18 03:12 PM REPORT-EL45A PAGE 001
TOTAL VOTES % EARLY POLLS PROV
PRECINCTS COUNTED (OF 249). . . . . 0
REGISTERED VOTERS - TOTAL . . . . . 524,980
REGISTERED VOTERS - DEMOCRATIC . . . 200,943 38.28
REGISTERED VOTERS - REPUBLICAN . . . 157,706 30.04
REGISTERED VOTERS - LIBERTARIAN . . . 4,100 .78
REGISTERED VOTERS - GREEN . . . . . 1,485 .28
REGISTERED VOTERS - PND. . . . . . 160,746
BALLOTS CAST - TOTAL. . . . . . . 209,630 172,681 33,155 3,794
BALLOTS CAST - NONPARTISAN. . . . . 346 .17 253 91 2
BALLOTS CAST - DEMOCRATIC . . . . . 113,493 54.14 95,635 15,555 2,303
BALLOTS CAST - REPUBLICAN . . . . . 94,191 44.93 75,475 17,283 1,433
BALLOTS CAST - LIBERTARIAN. . . . . 705 .34 529 149 27
BALLOTS CAST - GREEN. . . . . . . 895 .43 789 77 29
BALLOTS CAST - BLANK. . . . . . . 195 .09 113 70 12
VOTER TURNOUT - TOTAL . . . . . . 39.93
VOTER TURNOUT - DEMOCRATIC. . . . . 56.48
VOTER TURNOUT - REPUBLICAN. . . . . 59.73
VOTER TURNOUT - LIBERTARIAN . . . . 17.20
VOTER TURNOUT - GREEN . . . . . . 60.27
VOTER TURNOUT - BLANK . . . . . . .04
RESULTS FINAL
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
NONPARTISAN
RUN DATE:09/02/18 03:12 PM REPORT-EL45A PAGE 002
TOTAL VOTES % EARLY POLLS PROV
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY- MAYOR
(VOTE FOR) 1
HIREMATH, SATISH . . . . . . . . 6,563 41.49 5,471 1,011 81
WINFIELD, JOE . . . . . . . . . 9,242 58.43 7,590 1,525 127
WRITE-IN. . . . . . . . . . . 12 .08 12 0 0
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY - COUNCIL MEMBER
(VOTE FOR) 3
BARRETT, MELANIE . . . . . . . . 8,906 20.23 7,345 1,455 106
HORNAT, JOE. . . . . . . . . . 5,794 13.16 4,838 886 70
JONES-IVEY, JOYCE. . . . . . . . 8,485 19.27 7,019 1,360 106
NICOLSON, JOSH. . . . . . . . . 8,141 18.49 6,738 1,301 102
SNIDER, MARY . . . . . . . . . 6,694 15.20 5,634 976 84
WATERS, LOU. . . . . . . . . . 5,985 13.59 5,029 884 72
WRITE-IN. . . . . . . . . . . 22 .05 16 6 0
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY - PROPOSITION 462
(VOTE FOR) 1
YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,124 66.61 7,701 1,334 89
NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,574 33.39 3,676 822 76
E
Page 1 of 1
9/2/2018file:///X:/_Shared%20Data/2018%20Primary/Canvass%20Materials/ORO%20VALLEY/O...
statement of
votes cast
E&l2a0o7c067F(s0p16.66h3b6T&a00L
PCT DETAIL RESULTS
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
STATISTICS
RUN DATE:09/02/18 03:11 PM REPORT-EL30A PAGE 0012-01
0012 012
TOTAL VOTES % EARLY POLLS PROV
REGISTERED VOTERS - TOTAL . . . . . . 4,340
REGISTERED VOTERS - DEMOCRATIC . . . . 1,295 29.84
REGISTERED VOTERS - REPUBLICAN . . . . 1,819 41.91
REGISTERED VOTERS - LIBERTARIAN . . . . 24 .55
REGISTERED VOTERS - GREEN . . . . . . 8 .18
REGISTERED VOTERS - PND. . . . . . . 1,194
BALLOTS CAST - TOTAL. . . . . . . . 2,246 1,889 314 43
BALLOTS CAST - NONPARTISAN. . . . . . 16 .71 12 4 0
BALLOTS CAST - DEMOCRATIC . . . . . . 949 42.25 834 91 24
BALLOTS CAST - REPUBLICAN . . . . . . 1,267 56.41 1,032 217 18
BALLOTS CAST - LIBERTARIAN. . . . . . 7 .31 7 0 0
BALLOTS CAST - GREEN. . . . . . . . 7 .31 4 2 1
BALLOTS CAST - BLANK. . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
VOTER TURNOUT - TOTAL . . . . . . . 51.75
VOTER TURNOUT - DEMOCRATIC. . . . . . 73.28
VOTER TURNOUT - REPUBLICAN. . . . . . 69.65
VOTER TURNOUT - LIBERTARIAN . . . . . 29.17
VOTER TURNOUT - GREEN . . . . . . . 87.50
VOTER TURNOUT - BLANK . . . . . . .
PCT DETAIL RESULTS
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
NONPARTISAN
RUN DATE:09/02/18 03:11 PM REPORT-EL30A PAGE 0012-02
0012 012
TOTAL VOTES % EARLY POLLS PROV
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY- MAYOR
(VOTE FOR) 1
HIREMATH, SATISH . . . . . . . . . 908 41.88 762 129 17
WINFIELD, JOE . . . . . . . . . . 1,255 57.89 1,053 179 23
WRITE-IN. . . . . . . . . . . . 5 .23 5 0 0
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY - COUNCIL MEMBER
(VOTE FOR) 3
BARRETT, MELANIE . . . . . . . . . 1,214 20.48 1,020 171 23
HORNAT, JOE. . . . . . . . . . . 765 12.90 639 114 12
JONES-IVEY, JOYCE. . . . . . . . . 1,159 19.55 978 160 21
NICOLSON, JOSH. . . . . . . . . . 1,058 17.84 892 147 19
SNIDER, MARY . . . . . . . . . . 924 15.58 790 118 16
WATERS, LOU. . . . . . . . . . . 803 13.54 676 117 10
WRITE-IN. . . . . . . . . . . . 6 .10 3 3 0
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY - PROPOSITION 462
(VOTE FOR) 1
YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,246 66.49 1,061 161 24
NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 628 33.51 513 105 10
PCT DETAIL RESULTS
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
STATISTICS
RUN DATE:09/02/18 03:11 PM REPORT-EL30A PAGE 0013-01
0013 013
TOTAL VOTES % EARLY POLLS PROV
REGISTERED VOTERS - TOTAL . . . . . . 2,600
REGISTERED VOTERS - DEMOCRATIC . . . . 845 32.50
REGISTERED VOTERS - REPUBLICAN . . . . 915 35.19
REGISTERED VOTERS - LIBERTARIAN . . . . 23 .88
REGISTERED VOTERS - GREEN . . . . . . 10 .38
REGISTERED VOTERS - PND. . . . . . . 807
BALLOTS CAST - TOTAL. . . . . . . . 1,076 847 207 22
BALLOTS CAST - NONPARTISAN. . . . . . 10 .93 5 5 0
BALLOTS CAST - DEMOCRATIC . . . . . . 535 49.72 448 78 9
BALLOTS CAST - REPUBLICAN . . . . . . 526 48.88 391 123 12
BALLOTS CAST - LIBERTARIAN. . . . . . 3 .28 1 1 1
BALLOTS CAST - GREEN. . . . . . . . 2 .19 2 0 0
BALLOTS CAST - BLANK. . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
VOTER TURNOUT - TOTAL . . . . . . . 41.38
VOTER TURNOUT - DEMOCRATIC. . . . . . 63.31
VOTER TURNOUT - REPUBLICAN. . . . . . 57.49
VOTER TURNOUT - LIBERTARIAN . . . . . 13.04
VOTER TURNOUT - GREEN . . . . . . . 20.00
VOTER TURNOUT - BLANK . . . . . . .
PCT DETAIL RESULTS
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
NONPARTISAN
RUN DATE:09/02/18 03:11 PM REPORT-EL30A PAGE 0013-02
0013 013
TOTAL VOTES % EARLY POLLS PROV
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY- MAYOR
(VOTE FOR) 1
Page 1 of 10
9/2/2018file:///X:/_Shared%20Data/2018%20Primary/Canvass%20Materials/ORO%20VALLEY/O...
HIREMATH, SATISH . . . . . . . . . 422 41.49 331 83 8
WINFIELD, JOE . . . . . . . . . . 595 58.51 468 113 14
WRITE-IN. . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY - COUNCIL MEMBER
(VOTE FOR) 3
BARRETT, MELANIE . . . . . . . . . 565 20.46 452 99 14
HORNAT, JOE. . . . . . . . . . . 343 12.42 270 66 7
JONES-IVEY, JOYCE. . . . . . . . . 548 19.84 435 102 11
NICOLSON, JOSH. . . . . . . . . . 481 17.41 368 101 12
SNIDER, MARY . . . . . . . . . . 447 16.18 368 71 8
WATERS, LOU. . . . . . . . . . . 378 13.69 297 72 9
WRITE-IN. . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY - PROPOSITION 462
(VOTE FOR) 1
YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . 526 59.17 430 88 8
NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 363 40.83 269 82 12
PCT DETAIL RESULTS
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
STATISTICS
RUN DATE:09/02/18 03:11 PM REPORT-EL30A PAGE 0024-01
0024 024
TOTAL VOTES % EARLY POLLS PROV
REGISTERED VOTERS - TOTAL . . . . . . 2,083
REGISTERED VOTERS - DEMOCRATIC . . . . 634 30.44
REGISTERED VOTERS - REPUBLICAN . . . . 754 36.20
REGISTERED VOTERS - LIBERTARIAN . . . . 22 1.06
REGISTERED VOTERS - GREEN . . . . . . 3 .14
REGISTERED VOTERS - PND. . . . . . . 670
BALLOTS CAST - TOTAL. . . . . . . . 790 616 153 21
BALLOTS CAST - NONPARTISAN. . . . . . 0 0 0 0
BALLOTS CAST - DEMOCRATIC . . . . . . 310 39.24 256 45 9
BALLOTS CAST - REPUBLICAN . . . . . . 477 60.38 357 108 12
BALLOTS CAST - LIBERTARIAN. . . . . . 1 .13 1 0 0
BALLOTS CAST - GREEN. . . . . . . . 2 .25 2 0 0
BALLOTS CAST - BLANK. . . . . . . . 1 .13 0 1 0
VOTER TURNOUT - TOTAL . . . . . . . 37.93
VOTER TURNOUT - DEMOCRATIC. . . . . . 48.90
VOTER TURNOUT - REPUBLICAN. . . . . . 63.26
VOTER TURNOUT - LIBERTARIAN . . . . . 4.55
VOTER TURNOUT - GREEN . . . . . . . 66.67
VOTER TURNOUT - BLANK . . . . . . . .05
PCT DETAIL RESULTS
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
NONPARTISAN
RUN DATE:09/02/18 03:11 PM REPORT-EL30A PAGE 0024-02
0024 024
TOTAL VOTES % EARLY POLLS PROV
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY- MAYOR
(VOTE FOR) 1
HIREMATH, SATISH . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
WINFIELD, JOE . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
WRITE-IN. . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY - COUNCIL MEMBER
(VOTE FOR) 3
BARRETT, MELANIE . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
HORNAT, JOE. . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
JONES-IVEY, JOYCE. . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
NICOLSON, JOSH. . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
SNIDER, MARY . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
WATERS, LOU. . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
WRITE-IN. . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY - PROPOSITION 462
(VOTE FOR) 1
YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
PCT DETAIL RESULTS
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
STATISTICS
RUN DATE:09/02/18 03:11 PM REPORT-EL30A PAGE 0029-01
0029 029
TOTAL VOTES % EARLY POLLS PROV
REGISTERED VOTERS - TOTAL . . . . . . 3,059
REGISTERED VOTERS - DEMOCRATIC . . . . 967 31.61
REGISTERED VOTERS - REPUBLICAN . . . . 1,265 41.35
REGISTERED VOTERS - LIBERTARIAN . . . . 25 .82
REGISTERED VOTERS - GREEN . . . . . . 5 .16
REGISTERED VOTERS - PND. . . . . . . 797
BALLOTS CAST - TOTAL. . . . . . . . 1,527 1,290 219 18
BALLOTS CAST - NONPARTISAN. . . . . . 0 0 0 0
BALLOTS CAST - DEMOCRATIC . . . . . . 684 44.79 596 82 6
BALLOTS CAST - REPUBLICAN . . . . . . 841 55.08 693 136 12
Page 2 of 10
9/2/2018file:///X:/_Shared%20Data/2018%20Primary/Canvass%20Materials/ORO%20VALLEY/O...
BALLOTS CAST - LIBERTARIAN. . . . . . 1 .07 0 1 0
BALLOTS CAST - GREEN. . . . . . . . 1 .07 1 0 0
BALLOTS CAST - BLANK. . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
VOTER TURNOUT - TOTAL . . . . . . . 49.92
VOTER TURNOUT - DEMOCRATIC. . . . . . 70.73
VOTER TURNOUT - REPUBLICAN. . . . . . 66.48
VOTER TURNOUT - LIBERTARIAN . . . . . 4.00
VOTER TURNOUT - GREEN . . . . . . . 20.00
VOTER TURNOUT - BLANK . . . . . . .
PCT DETAIL RESULTS
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
NONPARTISAN
RUN DATE:09/02/18 03:11 PM REPORT-EL30A PAGE 0029-02
0029 029
TOTAL VOTES % EARLY POLLS PROV
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY- MAYOR
(VOTE FOR) 1
HIREMATH, SATISH . . . . . . . . . 7 70.00 7 0 0
WINFIELD, JOE . . . . . . . . . . 3 30.00 3 0 0
WRITE-IN. . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY - COUNCIL MEMBER
(VOTE FOR) 3
BARRETT, MELANIE . . . . . . . . . 5 20.00 5 0 0
HORNAT, JOE. . . . . . . . . . . 2 8.00 2 0 0
JONES-IVEY, JOYCE. . . . . . . . . 5 20.00 5 0 0
NICOLSON, JOSH. . . . . . . . . . 4 16.00 4 0 0
SNIDER, MARY . . . . . . . . . . 6 24.00 6 0 0
WATERS, LOU. . . . . . . . . . . 3 12.00 3 0 0
WRITE-IN. . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY - PROPOSITION 462
(VOTE FOR) 1
YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 70.00 7 0 0
NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 30.00 3 0 0
PCT DETAIL RESULTS
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
STATISTICS
RUN DATE:09/02/18 03:11 PM REPORT-EL30A PAGE 0077-01
0077 077
TOTAL VOTES % EARLY POLLS PROV
REGISTERED VOTERS - TOTAL . . . . . . 2,382
REGISTERED VOTERS - DEMOCRATIC . . . . 618 25.94
REGISTERED VOTERS - REPUBLICAN . . . . 1,054 44.25
REGISTERED VOTERS - LIBERTARIAN . . . . 12 .50
REGISTERED VOTERS - GREEN . . . . . . 3 .13
REGISTERED VOTERS - PND. . . . . . . 695
BALLOTS CAST - TOTAL. . . . . . . . 1,230 1,004 205 21
BALLOTS CAST - NONPARTISAN. . . . . . 29 2.36 23 6 0
BALLOTS CAST - DEMOCRATIC . . . . . . 460 37.40 397 56 7
BALLOTS CAST - REPUBLICAN . . . . . . 735 59.76 580 142 13
BALLOTS CAST - LIBERTARIAN. . . . . . 3 .24 1 1 1
BALLOTS CAST - GREEN. . . . . . . . 3 .24 3 0 0
BALLOTS CAST - BLANK. . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
VOTER TURNOUT - TOTAL . . . . . . . 51.64
VOTER TURNOUT - DEMOCRATIC. . . . . . 74.43
VOTER TURNOUT - REPUBLICAN. . . . . . 69.73
VOTER TURNOUT - LIBERTARIAN . . . . . 25.00
VOTER TURNOUT - GREEN . . . . . . . 100.00
VOTER TURNOUT - BLANK . . . . . . .
PCT DETAIL RESULTS
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
NONPARTISAN
RUN DATE:09/02/18 03:11 PM REPORT-EL30A PAGE 0077-02
0077 077
TOTAL VOTES % EARLY POLLS PROV
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY- MAYOR
(VOTE FOR) 1
HIREMATH, SATISH . . . . . . . . . 525 43.42 439 78 8
WINFIELD, JOE . . . . . . . . . . 683 56.49 546 125 12
WRITE-IN. . . . . . . . . . . . 1 .08 1 0 0
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY - COUNCIL MEMBER
(VOTE FOR) 3
BARRETT, MELANIE . . . . . . . . . 657 19.20 531 116 10
HORNAT, JOE. . . . . . . . . . . 479 14.00 391 78 10
JONES-IVEY, JOYCE. . . . . . . . . 638 18.65 519 109 10
NICOLSON, JOSH. . . . . . . . . . 634 18.53 516 108 10
SNIDER, MARY . . . . . . . . . . 522 15.26 424 88 10
WATERS, LOU. . . . . . . . . . . 489 14.29 401 81 7
WRITE-IN. . . . . . . . . . . . 2 .06 2 0 0
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY - PROPOSITION 462
(VOTE FOR) 1
YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . 726 69.08 614 103 9
Page 3 of 10
9/2/2018file:///X:/_Shared%20Data/2018%20Primary/Canvass%20Materials/ORO%20VALLEY/O...
NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 325 30.92 244 73 8
PCT DETAIL RESULTS
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
STATISTICS
RUN DATE:09/02/18 03:11 PM REPORT-EL30A PAGE 0145-01
0145 145
TOTAL VOTES % EARLY POLLS PROV
REGISTERED VOTERS - TOTAL . . . . . . 4,636
REGISTERED VOTERS - DEMOCRATIC . . . . 1,249 26.94
REGISTERED VOTERS - REPUBLICAN . . . . 1,918 41.37
REGISTERED VOTERS - LIBERTARIAN . . . . 20 .43
REGISTERED VOTERS - GREEN . . . . . . 3 .06
REGISTERED VOTERS - PND. . . . . . . 1,446
BALLOTS CAST - TOTAL. . . . . . . . 2,990 2,616 345 29
BALLOTS CAST - NONPARTISAN. . . . . . 46 1.54 42 4 0
BALLOTS CAST - DEMOCRATIC . . . . . . 1,183 39.57 1,051 118 14
BALLOTS CAST - REPUBLICAN . . . . . . 1,743 58.29 1,506 222 15
BALLOTS CAST - LIBERTARIAN. . . . . . 8 .27 7 1 0
BALLOTS CAST - GREEN. . . . . . . . 10 .33 10 0 0
BALLOTS CAST - BLANK. . . . . . . . 1 .03 0 1 0
VOTER TURNOUT - TOTAL . . . . . . . 64.50
VOTER TURNOUT - DEMOCRATIC. . . . . . 94.72
VOTER TURNOUT - REPUBLICAN. . . . . . 90.88
VOTER TURNOUT - LIBERTARIAN . . . . . 40.00
VOTER TURNOUT - GREEN . . . . . . . 333.33
VOTER TURNOUT - BLANK . . . . . . . .02
PCT DETAIL RESULTS
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
NONPARTISAN
RUN DATE:09/02/18 03:11 PM REPORT-EL30A PAGE 0145-02
0145 145
TOTAL VOTES % EARLY POLLS PROV
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY- MAYOR
(VOTE FOR) 1
HIREMATH, SATISH . . . . . . . . . 897 30.73 783 109 5
WINFIELD, JOE . . . . . . . . . . 2,021 69.24 1,771 227 23
WRITE-IN. . . . . . . . . . . . 1 .03 1 0 0
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY - COUNCIL MEMBER
(VOTE FOR) 3
BARRETT, MELANIE . . . . . . . . . 1,874 22.75 1,639 219 16
HORNAT, JOE. . . . . . . . . . . 824 10.00 734 87 3
JONES-IVEY, JOYCE. . . . . . . . . 1,800 21.85 1,580 204 16
NICOLSON, JOSH. . . . . . . . . . 1,764 21.41 1,544 203 17
SNIDER, MARY . . . . . . . . . . 1,086 13.18 965 112 9
WATERS, LOU. . . . . . . . . . . 888 10.78 788 94 6
WRITE-IN. . . . . . . . . . . . 2 .02 2 0 0
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY - PROPOSITION 462
(VOTE FOR) 1
YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,665 65.29 1,465 191 9
NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 885 34.71 774 100 11
PCT DETAIL RESULTS
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
STATISTICS
RUN DATE:09/02/18 03:11 PM REPORT-EL30A PAGE 0169-01
0169 169
TOTAL VOTES % EARLY POLLS PROV
REGISTERED VOTERS - TOTAL . . . . . . 3,441
REGISTERED VOTERS - DEMOCRATIC . . . . 904 26.27
REGISTERED VOTERS - REPUBLICAN . . . . 1,511 43.91
REGISTERED VOTERS - LIBERTARIAN . . . . 16 .46
REGISTERED VOTERS - GREEN . . . . . . 3 .09
REGISTERED VOTERS - PND. . . . . . . 1,007
BALLOTS CAST - TOTAL. . . . . . . . 1,918 1,538 355 25
BALLOTS CAST - NONPARTISAN. . . . . . 24 1.25 21 3 0
BALLOTS CAST - DEMOCRATIC . . . . . . 703 36.65 570 120 13
BALLOTS CAST - REPUBLICAN . . . . . . 1,173 61.16 934 227 12
BALLOTS CAST - LIBERTARIAN. . . . . . 8 .42 3 5 0
BALLOTS CAST - GREEN. . . . . . . . 10 .52 10 0 0
BALLOTS CAST - BLANK. . . . . . . . 2 .10 1 1 0
VOTER TURNOUT - TOTAL . . . . . . . 55.74
VOTER TURNOUT - DEMOCRATIC. . . . . . 77.77
VOTER TURNOUT - REPUBLICAN. . . . . . 77.63
VOTER TURNOUT - LIBERTARIAN . . . . . 50.00
VOTER TURNOUT - GREEN . . . . . . . 333.33
VOTER TURNOUT - BLANK . . . . . . . .06
PCT DETAIL RESULTS
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
NONPARTISAN
RUN DATE:09/02/18 03:11 PM REPORT-EL30A PAGE 0169-02
0169 169
TOTAL VOTES % EARLY POLLS PROV
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY- MAYOR
(VOTE FOR) 1
Page 4 of 10
9/2/2018file:///X:/_Shared%20Data/2018%20Primary/Canvass%20Materials/ORO%20VALLEY/O...
HIREMATH, SATISH . . . . . . . . . 782 42.00 660 114 8
WINFIELD, JOE . . . . . . . . . . 1,079 57.95 834 229 16
WRITE-IN. . . . . . . . . . . . 1 .05 1 0 0
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY - COUNCIL MEMBER
(VOTE FOR) 3
BARRETT, MELANIE . . . . . . . . . 1,065 20.54 825 225 15
HORNAT, JOE. . . . . . . . . . . 695 13.40 592 95 8
JONES-IVEY, JOYCE. . . . . . . . . 990 19.09 772 202 16
NICOLSON, JOSH. . . . . . . . . . 948 18.28 740 195 13
SNIDER, MARY . . . . . . . . . . 780 15.04 661 111 8
WATERS, LOU. . . . . . . . . . . 705 13.59 609 90 6
WRITE-IN. . . . . . . . . . . . 3 .06 3 0 0
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY - PROPOSITION 462
(VOTE FOR) 1
YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,020 65.13 850 164 6
NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 546 34.87 423 110 13
PCT DETAIL RESULTS
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
STATISTICS
RUN DATE:09/02/18 03:11 PM REPORT-EL30A PAGE 0172-01
0172 172
TOTAL VOTES % EARLY POLLS PROV
REGISTERED VOTERS - TOTAL . . . . . . 3,075
REGISTERED VOTERS - DEMOCRATIC . . . . 713 23.19
REGISTERED VOTERS - REPUBLICAN . . . . 1,341 43.61
REGISTERED VOTERS - LIBERTARIAN . . . . 14 .46
REGISTERED VOTERS - GREEN . . . . . . 8 .26
REGISTERED VOTERS - PND. . . . . . . 999
BALLOTS CAST - TOTAL. . . . . . . . 1,629 1,334 276 19
BALLOTS CAST - NONPARTISAN. . . . . . 33 2.03 18 15 0
BALLOTS CAST - DEMOCRATIC . . . . . . 597 36.65 503 86 8
BALLOTS CAST - REPUBLICAN . . . . . . 992 60.90 807 174 11
BALLOTS CAST - LIBERTARIAN. . . . . . 3 .18 2 1 0
BALLOTS CAST - GREEN. . . . . . . . 4 .25 4 0 0
BALLOTS CAST - BLANK. . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
VOTER TURNOUT - TOTAL . . . . . . . 52.98
VOTER TURNOUT - DEMOCRATIC. . . . . . 83.73
VOTER TURNOUT - REPUBLICAN. . . . . . 73.97
VOTER TURNOUT - LIBERTARIAN . . . . . 21.43
VOTER TURNOUT - GREEN . . . . . . . 50.00
VOTER TURNOUT - BLANK . . . . . . .
PCT DETAIL RESULTS
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
NONPARTISAN
RUN DATE:09/02/18 03:11 PM REPORT-EL30A PAGE 0172-02
0172 172
TOTAL VOTES % EARLY POLLS PROV
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY- MAYOR
(VOTE FOR) 1
HIREMATH, SATISH . . . . . . . . . 628 39.37 530 92 6
WINFIELD, JOE . . . . . . . . . . 965 60.50 773 182 10
WRITE-IN. . . . . . . . . . . . 2 .13 2 0 0
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY - COUNCIL MEMBER
(VOTE FOR) 3
BARRETT, MELANIE . . . . . . . . . 940 21.22 758 174 8
HORNAT, JOE. . . . . . . . . . . 568 12.82 481 80 7
JONES-IVEY, JOYCE. . . . . . . . . 882 19.91 705 167 10
NICOLSON, JOSH. . . . . . . . . . 854 19.28 693 153 8
SNIDER, MARY . . . . . . . . . . 612 13.81 515 88 9
WATERS, LOU. . . . . . . . . . . 573 12.93 489 77 7
WRITE-IN. . . . . . . . . . . . 1 .02 0 1 0
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY - PROPOSITION 462
(VOTE FOR) 1
YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . 981 70.78 815 158 8
NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 405 29.22 328 72 5
PCT DETAIL RESULTS
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
STATISTICS
RUN DATE:09/02/18 03:11 PM REPORT-EL30A PAGE 0173-01
0173 173
TOTAL VOTES % EARLY POLLS PROV
REGISTERED VOTERS - TOTAL . . . . . . 2,614
REGISTERED VOTERS - DEMOCRATIC . . . . 709 27.12
REGISTERED VOTERS - REPUBLICAN . . . . 1,046 40.02
REGISTERED VOTERS - LIBERTARIAN . . . . 25 .96
REGISTERED VOTERS - GREEN . . . . . . 3 .11
REGISTERED VOTERS - PND. . . . . . . 831
BALLOTS CAST - TOTAL. . . . . . . . 1,313 1,059 236 18
BALLOTS CAST - NONPARTISAN. . . . . . 35 2.67 18 15 2
BALLOTS CAST - DEMOCRATIC . . . . . . 521 39.68 428 86 7
BALLOTS CAST - REPUBLICAN . . . . . . 745 56.74 604 132 9
Page 5 of 10
9/2/2018file:///X:/_Shared%20Data/2018%20Primary/Canvass%20Materials/ORO%20VALLEY/O...
BALLOTS CAST - LIBERTARIAN. . . . . . 6 .46 3 3 0
BALLOTS CAST - GREEN. . . . . . . . 6 .46 6 0 0
BALLOTS CAST - BLANK. . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
VOTER TURNOUT - TOTAL . . . . . . . 50.23
VOTER TURNOUT - DEMOCRATIC. . . . . . 73.48
VOTER TURNOUT - REPUBLICAN. . . . . . 71.22
VOTER TURNOUT - LIBERTARIAN . . . . . 24.00
VOTER TURNOUT - GREEN . . . . . . . 200.00
VOTER TURNOUT - BLANK . . . . . . .
PCT DETAIL RESULTS
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
NONPARTISAN
RUN DATE:09/02/18 03:11 PM REPORT-EL30A PAGE 0173-02
0173 173
TOTAL VOTES % EARLY POLLS PROV
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY- MAYOR
(VOTE FOR) 1
HIREMATH, SATISH . . . . . . . . . 651 50.94 522 118 11
WINFIELD, JOE . . . . . . . . . . 626 48.98 506 113 7
WRITE-IN. . . . . . . . . . . . 1 .08 1 0 0
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY - COUNCIL MEMBER
(VOTE FOR) 3
BARRETT, MELANIE . . . . . . . . . 620 17.56 508 107 5
HORNAT, JOE. . . . . . . . . . . 568 16.09 449 110 9
JONES-IVEY, JOYCE. . . . . . . . . 573 16.23 469 99 5
NICOLSON, JOSH. . . . . . . . . . 560 15.86 467 87 6
SNIDER, MARY . . . . . . . . . . 638 18.07 507 120 11
WATERS, LOU. . . . . . . . . . . 569 16.12 452 106 11
WRITE-IN. . . . . . . . . . . . 2 .06 2 0 0
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY - PROPOSITION 462
(VOTE FOR) 1
YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . 761 68.25 622 130 9
NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 354 31.75 286 66 2
PCT DETAIL RESULTS
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
STATISTICS
RUN DATE:09/02/18 03:11 PM REPORT-EL30A PAGE 0187-01
0187 187
TOTAL VOTES % EARLY POLLS PROV
REGISTERED VOTERS - TOTAL . . . . . . 3,114
REGISTERED VOTERS - DEMOCRATIC . . . . 954 30.64
REGISTERED VOTERS - REPUBLICAN . . . . 1,314 42.20
REGISTERED VOTERS - LIBERTARIAN . . . . 24 .77
REGISTERED VOTERS - GREEN . . . . . . 5 .16
REGISTERED VOTERS - PND. . . . . . . 817
BALLOTS CAST - TOTAL. . . . . . . . 1,568 1,341 215 12
BALLOTS CAST - NONPARTISAN. . . . . . 0 0 0 0
BALLOTS CAST - DEMOCRATIC . . . . . . 733 46.75 630 95 8
BALLOTS CAST - REPUBLICAN . . . . . . 829 52.87 705 120 4
BALLOTS CAST - LIBERTARIAN. . . . . . 3 .19 3 0 0
BALLOTS CAST - GREEN. . . . . . . . 3 .19 3 0 0
BALLOTS CAST - BLANK. . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
VOTER TURNOUT - TOTAL . . . . . . . 50.35
VOTER TURNOUT - DEMOCRATIC. . . . . . 76.83
VOTER TURNOUT - REPUBLICAN. . . . . . 63.09
VOTER TURNOUT - LIBERTARIAN . . . . . 12.50
VOTER TURNOUT - GREEN . . . . . . . 60.00
VOTER TURNOUT - BLANK . . . . . . .
PCT DETAIL RESULTS
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
NONPARTISAN
RUN DATE:09/02/18 03:11 PM REPORT-EL30A PAGE 0187-02
0187 187
TOTAL VOTES % EARLY POLLS PROV
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY- MAYOR
(VOTE FOR) 1
HIREMATH, SATISH . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
WINFIELD, JOE . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
WRITE-IN. . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY - COUNCIL MEMBER
(VOTE FOR) 3
BARRETT, MELANIE . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
HORNAT, JOE. . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
JONES-IVEY, JOYCE. . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
NICOLSON, JOSH. . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
SNIDER, MARY . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
WATERS, LOU. . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
WRITE-IN. . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY - PROPOSITION 462
(VOTE FOR) 1
YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
Page 6 of 10
9/2/2018file:///X:/_Shared%20Data/2018%20Primary/Canvass%20Materials/ORO%20VALLEY/O...
NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
PCT DETAIL RESULTS
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
STATISTICS
RUN DATE:09/02/18 03:11 PM REPORT-EL30A PAGE 0194-01
0194 194
TOTAL VOTES % EARLY POLLS PROV
REGISTERED VOTERS - TOTAL . . . . . . 3,063
REGISTERED VOTERS - DEMOCRATIC . . . . 803 26.22
REGISTERED VOTERS - REPUBLICAN . . . . 1,381 45.09
REGISTERED VOTERS - LIBERTARIAN . . . . 18 .59
REGISTERED VOTERS - GREEN . . . . . . 3 .10
REGISTERED VOTERS - PND. . . . . . . 858
BALLOTS CAST - TOTAL. . . . . . . . 1,589 1,339 238 12
BALLOTS CAST - NONPARTISAN. . . . . . 35 2.20 23 12 0
BALLOTS CAST - DEMOCRATIC . . . . . . 571 35.93 514 51 6
BALLOTS CAST - REPUBLICAN . . . . . . 972 61.17 792 174 6
BALLOTS CAST - LIBERTARIAN. . . . . . 7 .44 6 1 0
BALLOTS CAST - GREEN. . . . . . . . 4 .25 4 0 0
BALLOTS CAST - BLANK. . . . . . . . 1 .06 1 0 0
VOTER TURNOUT - TOTAL . . . . . . . 51.88
VOTER TURNOUT - DEMOCRATIC. . . . . . 71.11
VOTER TURNOUT - REPUBLICAN. . . . . . 70.38
VOTER TURNOUT - LIBERTARIAN . . . . . 38.89
VOTER TURNOUT - GREEN . . . . . . . 133.33
VOTER TURNOUT - BLANK . . . . . . . .03
PCT DETAIL RESULTS
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
NONPARTISAN
RUN DATE:09/02/18 03:11 PM REPORT-EL30A PAGE 0194-02
0194 194
TOTAL VOTES % EARLY POLLS PROV
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY- MAYOR
(VOTE FOR) 1
HIREMATH, SATISH . . . . . . . . . 858 54.68 744 108 6
WINFIELD, JOE . . . . . . . . . . 711 45.32 582 123 6
WRITE-IN. . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY - COUNCIL MEMBER
(VOTE FOR) 3
BARRETT, MELANIE . . . . . . . . . 742 16.88 608 129 5
HORNAT, JOE. . . . . . . . . . . 740 16.83 642 93 5
JONES-IVEY, JOYCE. . . . . . . . . 685 15.58 566 113 6
NICOLSON, JOSH. . . . . . . . . . 683 15.53 564 114 5
SNIDER, MARY . . . . . . . . . . 793 18.04 697 92 4
WATERS, LOU. . . . . . . . . . . 753 17.13 661 89 3
WRITE-IN. . . . . . . . . . . . 1 .02 0 1 0
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY - PROPOSITION 462
(VOTE FOR) 1
YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . 950 69.50 825 121 4
NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 417 30.50 334 79 4
PCT DETAIL RESULTS
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
STATISTICS
RUN DATE:09/02/18 03:11 PM REPORT-EL30A PAGE 0200-01
0200 200
TOTAL VOTES % EARLY POLLS PROV
REGISTERED VOTERS - TOTAL . . . . . . 1,325
REGISTERED VOTERS - DEMOCRATIC . . . . 272 20.53
REGISTERED VOTERS - REPUBLICAN . . . . 673 50.79
REGISTERED VOTERS - LIBERTARIAN . . . . 10 .75
REGISTERED VOTERS - GREEN . . . . . . 4 .30
REGISTERED VOTERS - PND. . . . . . . 366
BALLOTS CAST - TOTAL. . . . . . . . 650 518 121 11
BALLOTS CAST - NONPARTISAN. . . . . . 0 0 0 0
BALLOTS CAST - DEMOCRATIC . . . . . . 221 34.00 185 34 2
BALLOTS CAST - REPUBLICAN . . . . . . 419 64.46 325 85 9
BALLOTS CAST - LIBERTARIAN. . . . . . 3 .46 2 1 0
BALLOTS CAST - GREEN. . . . . . . . 7 1.08 6 1 0
BALLOTS CAST - BLANK. . . . . . . . 1 .15 1 0 0
VOTER TURNOUT - TOTAL . . . . . . . 49.06
VOTER TURNOUT - DEMOCRATIC. . . . . . 81.25
VOTER TURNOUT - REPUBLICAN. . . . . . 62.26
VOTER TURNOUT - LIBERTARIAN . . . . . 30.00
VOTER TURNOUT - GREEN . . . . . . . 175.00
VOTER TURNOUT - BLANK . . . . . . . .08
PCT DETAIL RESULTS
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
NONPARTISAN
RUN DATE:09/02/18 03:11 PM REPORT-EL30A PAGE 0200-02
0200 200
TOTAL VOTES % EARLY POLLS PROV
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY- MAYOR
(VOTE FOR) 1
Page 7 of 10
9/2/2018file:///X:/_Shared%20Data/2018%20Primary/Canvass%20Materials/ORO%20VALLEY/O...
HIREMATH, SATISH . . . . . . . . . 130 37.90 101 27 2
WINFIELD, JOE . . . . . . . . . . 212 61.81 166 42 4
WRITE-IN. . . . . . . . . . . . 1 .29 1 0 0
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY - COUNCIL MEMBER
(VOTE FOR) 3
BARRETT, MELANIE . . . . . . . . . 190 20.45 151 37 2
HORNAT, JOE. . . . . . . . . . . 121 13.02 97 23 1
JONES-IVEY, JOYCE. . . . . . . . . 178 19.16 142 34 2
NICOLSON, JOSH. . . . . . . . . . 188 20.24 152 33 3
SNIDER, MARY . . . . . . . . . . 126 13.56 99 26 1
WATERS, LOU. . . . . . . . . . . 122 13.13 98 23 1
WRITE-IN. . . . . . . . . . . . 4 .43 3 1 0
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY - PROPOSITION 462
(VOTE FOR) 1
YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173 62.23 142 28 3
NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 37.77 75 28 2
PCT DETAIL RESULTS
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
STATISTICS
RUN DATE:09/02/18 03:11 PM REPORT-EL30A PAGE 0202-01
0202 202
TOTAL VOTES % EARLY POLLS PROV
REGISTERED VOTERS - TOTAL . . . . . . 3,007
REGISTERED VOTERS - DEMOCRATIC . . . . 897 29.83
REGISTERED VOTERS - REPUBLICAN . . . . 1,196 39.77
REGISTERED VOTERS - LIBERTARIAN . . . . 33 1.10
REGISTERED VOTERS - GREEN . . . . . . 5 .17
REGISTERED VOTERS - PND. . . . . . . 876
BALLOTS CAST - TOTAL. . . . . . . . 1,307 1,081 210 16
BALLOTS CAST - NONPARTISAN. . . . . . 0 0 0 0
BALLOTS CAST - DEMOCRATIC . . . . . . 591 45.22 515 70 6
BALLOTS CAST - REPUBLICAN . . . . . . 710 54.32 561 139 10
BALLOTS CAST - LIBERTARIAN. . . . . . 3 .23 3 0 0
BALLOTS CAST - GREEN. . . . . . . . 3 .23 2 1 0
BALLOTS CAST - BLANK. . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
VOTER TURNOUT - TOTAL . . . . . . . 43.47
VOTER TURNOUT - DEMOCRATIC. . . . . . 65.89
VOTER TURNOUT - REPUBLICAN. . . . . . 59.36
VOTER TURNOUT - LIBERTARIAN . . . . . 9.09
VOTER TURNOUT - GREEN . . . . . . . 60.00
VOTER TURNOUT - BLANK . . . . . . .
PCT DETAIL RESULTS
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
NONPARTISAN
RUN DATE:09/02/18 03:11 PM REPORT-EL30A PAGE 0202-02
0202 202
TOTAL VOTES % EARLY POLLS PROV
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY- MAYOR
(VOTE FOR) 1
HIREMATH, SATISH . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
WINFIELD, JOE . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
WRITE-IN. . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY - COUNCIL MEMBER
(VOTE FOR) 3
BARRETT, MELANIE . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
HORNAT, JOE. . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
JONES-IVEY, JOYCE. . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
NICOLSON, JOSH. . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
SNIDER, MARY . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
WATERS, LOU. . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
WRITE-IN. . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY - PROPOSITION 462
(VOTE FOR) 1
YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
PCT DETAIL RESULTS
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
STATISTICS
RUN DATE:09/02/18 03:11 PM REPORT-EL30A PAGE 0212-01
0212 212
TOTAL VOTES % EARLY POLLS PROV
REGISTERED VOTERS - TOTAL . . . . . . 1,507
REGISTERED VOTERS - DEMOCRATIC . . . . 434 28.80
REGISTERED VOTERS - REPUBLICAN . . . . 636 42.20
REGISTERED VOTERS - LIBERTARIAN . . . . 7 .46
REGISTERED VOTERS - GREEN . . . . . . 4 .27
REGISTERED VOTERS - PND. . . . . . . 426
BALLOTS CAST - TOTAL. . . . . . . . 701 527 167 7
BALLOTS CAST - NONPARTISAN. . . . . . 3 .43 3 0 0
BALLOTS CAST - DEMOCRATIC . . . . . . 265 37.80 218 42 5
BALLOTS CAST - REPUBLICAN . . . . . . 426 60.77 300 124 2
Page 8 of 10
9/2/2018file:///X:/_Shared%20Data/2018%20Primary/Canvass%20Materials/ORO%20VALLEY/O...
BALLOTS CAST - LIBERTARIAN. . . . . . 2 .29 2 0 0
BALLOTS CAST - GREEN. . . . . . . . 5 .71 4 1 0
BALLOTS CAST - BLANK. . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
VOTER TURNOUT - TOTAL . . . . . . . 46.52
VOTER TURNOUT - DEMOCRATIC. . . . . . 61.06
VOTER TURNOUT - REPUBLICAN. . . . . . 66.98
VOTER TURNOUT - LIBERTARIAN . . . . . 28.57
VOTER TURNOUT - GREEN . . . . . . . 125.00
VOTER TURNOUT - BLANK . . . . . . .
PCT DETAIL RESULTS
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
NONPARTISAN
RUN DATE:09/02/18 03:11 PM REPORT-EL30A PAGE 0212-02
0212 212
TOTAL VOTES % EARLY POLLS PROV
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY- MAYOR
(VOTE FOR) 1
HIREMATH, SATISH . . . . . . . . . 306 44.61 228 74 4
WINFIELD, JOE . . . . . . . . . . 380 55.39 290 87 3
WRITE-IN. . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY - COUNCIL MEMBER
(VOTE FOR) 3
BARRETT, MELANIE . . . . . . . . . 365 19.40 283 79 3
HORNAT, JOE. . . . . . . . . . . 270 14.35 202 66 2
JONES-IVEY, JOYCE. . . . . . . . . 359 19.09 277 79 3
NICOLSON, JOSH. . . . . . . . . . 327 17.38 259 65 3
SNIDER, MARY . . . . . . . . . . 294 15.63 221 71 2
WATERS, LOU. . . . . . . . . . . 266 14.14 201 63 2
WRITE-IN. . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY - PROPOSITION 462
(VOTE FOR) 1
YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . 391 66.84 308 82 1
NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194 33.16 130 60 4
PCT DETAIL RESULTS
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
STATISTICS
RUN DATE:09/02/18 03:11 PM REPORT-EL30A PAGE 0216-01
0216 216
TOTAL VOTES % EARLY POLLS PROV
REGISTERED VOTERS - TOTAL . . . . . . 2,042
REGISTERED VOTERS - DEMOCRATIC . . . . 552 27.03
REGISTERED VOTERS - REPUBLICAN . . . . 891 43.63
REGISTERED VOTERS - LIBERTARIAN . . . . 12 .59
REGISTERED VOTERS - GREEN . . . . . . 0
REGISTERED VOTERS - PND. . . . . . . 587
BALLOTS CAST - TOTAL. . . . . . . . 1,193 986 191 16
BALLOTS CAST - NONPARTISAN. . . . . . 20 1.68 13 7 0
BALLOTS CAST - DEMOCRATIC . . . . . . 466 39.06 395 66 5
BALLOTS CAST - REPUBLICAN . . . . . . 690 57.84 567 112 11
BALLOTS CAST - LIBERTARIAN. . . . . . 9 .75 4 5 0
BALLOTS CAST - GREEN. . . . . . . . 8 .67 7 1 0
BALLOTS CAST - BLANK. . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
VOTER TURNOUT - TOTAL . . . . . . . 58.42
VOTER TURNOUT - DEMOCRATIC. . . . . . 84.42
VOTER TURNOUT - REPUBLICAN. . . . . . 77.44
VOTER TURNOUT - LIBERTARIAN . . . . . 75.00
VOTER TURNOUT - BLANK . . . . . . .
PCT DETAIL RESULTS
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
NONPARTISAN
RUN DATE:09/02/18 03:11 PM REPORT-EL30A PAGE 0216-02
0216 216
TOTAL VOTES % EARLY POLLS PROV
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY- MAYOR
(VOTE FOR) 1
HIREMATH, SATISH . . . . . . . . . 449 38.67 364 79 6
WINFIELD, JOE . . . . . . . . . . 712 61.33 598 105 9
WRITE-IN. . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY - COUNCIL MEMBER
(VOTE FOR) 3
BARRETT, MELANIE . . . . . . . . . 669 20.28 565 99 5
HORNAT, JOE. . . . . . . . . . . 419 12.70 339 74 6
JONES-IVEY, JOYCE. . . . . . . . . 668 20.25 571 91 6
NICOLSON, JOSH. . . . . . . . . . 640 19.40 539 95 6
SNIDER, MARY . . . . . . . . . . 466 14.13 381 79 6
WATERS, LOU. . . . . . . . . . . 436 13.22 354 72 10
WRITE-IN. . . . . . . . . . . . 1 .03 1 0 0
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY - PROPOSITION 462
(VOTE FOR) 1
YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . 678 66.02 562 108 8
NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 349 33.98 297 47 5
Page 9 of 10
9/2/2018file:///X:/_Shared%20Data/2018%20Primary/Canvass%20Materials/ORO%20VALLEY/O...
E
Page 10 of 10
9/2/2018file:///X:/_Shared%20Data/2018%20Primary/Canvass%20Materials/ORO%20VALLEY/O...