Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPackets - Council Packets (962)         AGENDA  ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION JANUARY 9, 2019 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CAÑADA DRIVE Executive Sessions – Upon a vote of the majority of the Town Council, the Council may enter into Executive Sessions pursuant to Arizona Revised Statues §38-431.03 (A)(3) to obtain legal advice on matters listed on the Agenda.        REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM   CALL TO ORDER   ROLL CALL   PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE   UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS   COUNCIL REPORTS   TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT   The Mayor and Council may consider and/or take action on the items listed below: ORDER OF BUSINESS: MAYOR WILL REVIEW THE ORDER OF THE MEETING   INFORMATIONAL ITEMS   1.2018 Newly Elected Officials Training Trip Report   CALL TO AUDIENCE – At this time, any member of the public is allowed to address the Mayor and Town Council on any issue not listed on today’s agenda. Pursuant to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, individual Council Members may ask Town Staff to review the matter, ask that the matter be placed on a future agenda, or respond to criticism made by speakers. However, the Mayor and Council may not discuss or take legal action on matters raised during “Call to Audience.” In order to speak during “Call to Audience” please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card.   PRESENTATIONS   1.Presentation - Youth Art Program by the Arts and Culture Ambassadors   CONSENT AGENDA  (Consideration and/or possible action)   A.Minutes - December 5, 2018   B.Request for approval of a Final Plat for the Valley Vista residential development located within the Rancho Vistoso PAD, east of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard along the future Moore Road Loop extension   REGULAR AGENDA   1.PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE NO. (O)19-01, DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING A REZONING REQUEST FROM CAMPUS PARK INDUSTRIAL TO MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL FOR AN APPROXIMATE 15-ACRE PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF RANCHO VISTOSO BLVD AND VISTOSO COMMERCE LOOP   2.DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING A MASTER SIGN PROGRAM FOR THE PLACITA DE ORO SHOPPING CENTER LOCATED AT 11901 N. FIRST AVENUE   3.RESOLUTION NO. (R)19-01, ESTABLISHING A BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMISSION AND ESTABLISHING THE TASKING AND OPERATIONS OF SAID COMMISSION BY ADOPTING THE DOCUMENT KNOWN AS THE "OPERATING PROCEDURES ORO VALLEY BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMISSION" AND MAKING SUCH A DOCUMENT A PUBLIC RECORD (THE RESOLUTION AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS WILL BE UPLOADED ONCE FINALIZED) (RESOLUTION AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS ADDED 1/3/19 @ 4:45 PM)   FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS (The Council may bring forth general topics for future meeting agendas. Council may not discuss, deliberate or take any action on the topics presented pursuant to ARS 38-431.02H)   CALL TO AUDIENCE – At this time, any member of the public is allowed to address the Mayor and Town Council on any issue not listed on today’s agenda. Pursuant to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, individual Council Members may ask Town Staff to review the matter, ask that the matter be placed on a future agenda, or respond to criticism made by speakers. However, the Mayor and Council may not discuss or take legal action on matters raised during “Call to Audience.” In order to speak during “Call to Audience” please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card.   ADJOURNMENT     POSTED: 1/2/19 at 5:00 p.m. by pp When possible, a packet of agenda materials as listed above is available for public inspection at least 24 hours prior to the Council meeting in the office of the Town Clerk between the hours of 8:00 a.m. – 5:00p.m. The Town of Oro Valley complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If any person with a disability needs any type of accommodation, please notify the Town Clerk’s Office at least five days prior to the Council meeting at 229-4700. INSTRUCTIONS TO SPEAKERS Members of the public have the right to speak during any posted public hearing. However, those items not listed as a public hearing are for consideration and action by the Town Council during the course of their business meeting. Members of the public may be allowed to speak on these topics at the discretion of the Chair. If you wish to address the Town Council on any item(s) on this agenda, please complete a speaker card located on the Agenda table at the back of the room and give it to the Town Clerk. Please indicate on the speaker card which item number and topic you wish to speak on, or if you wish to speak during “Call to Audience”, please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. Please step forward to the podium when the Mayor announces the item(s) on the agenda which you are interested in addressing. 1. For the record, please state your name and whether or not you are a Town resident. 2. Speak only on the issue currently being discussed by Council. Please organize your speech, you will only be allowed to address the Council once regarding the topic being discussed. 3. Please limit your comments to 3 minutes. 4. During “Call to Audience” you may address the Council on any issue you wish. 5. Any member of the public speaking must speak in a courteous and respectful manner to those present. Thank you for your cooperation.    Town Council Regular Session 1. Meeting Date:01/09/2019   Submitted By:Lynda Koepfer, Town Manager's Office Information Subject 2018 Newly Elected Officials Training Trip Report Attachments 2018 Newly Elected Officials Training Trip Report     Town Council Regular Session 1. Meeting Date:01/09/2019   Presentation - Youth Art Program Information Subject Presentation - Youth Art Program by the Arts and Culture Ambassadors Summary Attachments No file(s) attached.    Town Council Regular Session A. Meeting Date:01/09/2019   Requested by: Mike Standish Submitted By:Michelle Stine, Town Clerk's Office Department:Town Clerk's Office Information SUBJECT: Minutes - December 5, 2018 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval.    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: N/A BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: N/A SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to approve, (approve with the following changes) the December 5, 2018 minutes. Attachments 12-5-18 Draft Minutes  12/5/18 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 1 MINUTES ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION December 5, 2018 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 4:00 PM CALL TO ORDER Mayor Winfield called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Joseph C. Winfield, Mayor Melanie Barrett, Vice Mayor (attended via phone) Joyce Jones-Ivey, Councilmember Josh Nicolson, Councilmember Rhonda Piña, Councilmember Bill Rodman, Councilmember Steve Solomon, Councilmember *EXECUTIVE SESSION - 1. Pursuant to ARS 38-431.03(A)(4) and (A)(7) to discuss and consult with its attorneys for legal advice regarding potential land contract negotiations. *2. Pursuant to ARS 38-431.03(A)(4) to discuss contract negotiations MOTION: A motion was made by Councilmember Rodman and seconded by Councilmember Piña to go into Executive Session at 4:02 p.m. pursuant to ARS 38 - 431.03(A)(7) to discuss and consult with its attorneys for legal advice regarding potential land contract negotiations and pursuant to ARS 38 -431.03(A)(4) to discuss contract negotiations. MOTION carried, 7-0. Mayor Winfield said the following staff members would join Council in Executive Session: Town Manager Mary Jacobs, Assistant Town Manager Chris Cornelison, Legal Services Director Tobin Sidles, Town Attorney Gary Cohen and Town Clerk Mike Standish. REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER Mayor Winfield called the meeting to order at 6:02 p.m. 12/5/18 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 2 ROLL CALL PRESENT: Joseph C. Winfield, Mayor Melanie Barrett, Vice Mayor (attended via phone) Joyce Jones-Ivey, Councilmember Josh Nicolson, Councilmember Rhonda Piña, Councilmember Bill Rodman, Councilmember Steve Solomon, Councilmember PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Winfield led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS Communications Administrator Misti Nowak announced the upcoming Town meetings. COUNCIL REPORTS Mayor Winfield gave an overview of his activities and events that he has attended since being sworn in to office on November 7th, 2018. DEPARTMENT REPORTS Town Manager Mary Jacobs reported that the Town had re ceived a positive self-insured wellness score from United Health Care. In addition, Ms. Jacobs encouraged residents to sign up for WaterSmart, a free online service for Oro Valley Water Utility customers that helps effectively manage water use and lower monthly water bills. Ms. Jacobs also wished everyone a very happy holiday and prosperous New Year! ORDER OF BUSINESS Mayor Winfield reviewed the order of business and stated that the order would stand as posted. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS There were no informational items. CALL TO AUDIENCE Oro Valley resident Nancy Young Wright voiced her concerns regarding the road conditions adjacent to Rancho Verde North subdivision. 12/5/18 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 3 PRES ENTATIONS 1. Presentation - Youth Art Program by the Arts and Culture Ambassadors Arts and Culture Ambassador Sasha Case introduced the pieces of artwork on display in the Council Chambers which were created by students from Casas Christian School, Basis Oro Valley School, Innovation Academy and Canyon Del Oro High School. Mayor Winfield recessed the meeting at 6:27 p.m. Mayor Winfield reconvened the meeting at 6:32 p.m. CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Jones-Ivey requested that item (C) be removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion. A. Minutes - November 7, 2018 B. Fiscal Year 2018/19 Financial Update through September 2018 D. Approval of the 2019 regular Town Council meeting schedule E. Approval to amend the 2018 Council liaison assignments and to set the 2019 Council liaison assignments F. Resolution No. (R)18-48, approving the Agenda Committee assignment for the period of December 1, 2018 to March 1, 2019 G. Resolution No. (R)18-49, accepting a 2018 Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) grant in the amount of $200,000 and authorizing the Town to pay the remainder of the project fees for the ball field rehabilitation at James D. Kriegh Park; and directing the Town Manager, Town Clerk, Town Legal Services Director, or their duly authorized officers and agents to take all steps necessary to carry out the purposes and intent of this resolution H. Request for approval of a Final Plat for a commercial development, located on the northeast corner of Oracle Road and Linda Vista Boulevard within the El Corredor Planned Area Development I. Request for approval of a Final Plat Amendment and accompanying license agreement to maintain the existing turn-a-round at the end of Three Oaks Drive A: A Final Plat Amendment to remove a requirement for Three Oaks Drive to connect to La Cholla Boulevard B: A License Agreement between the Town of Oro Valley and the C añada Hills Parcels D & E Homeowner's Association for maintenance and responsibility of the turn-a-round, currently located in the public right-of-way 12/5/18 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 4 J. *Approval to allow the Town Manager, Town Attorney and any necessary personnel to proceed as discussed in Executive Session item #1 K. *Approval to allow the Town Manager, Town Attorney, Economic Development Director and all other necessary personnel to proceed as discussed in Executive Session item #2 MOTION: A motion was made by Councilmember Rodman and seconded by Councilmember Piña to approve Consent Agenda items (A - B) and (D - K). MOTION carried, 7-0 C. Fiscal Year 2018/19 Financial Update through October 2018 Chief Financial Officer Stacey Lemos gave an overview of the Fiscal Year 2018/19 Financial Update through October 2018. Discussion ensued amongst Council and staff regarding the Fiscal Year 2018/19 Financial Update through October 2018. MOTION: A motion was made by Councilmember Rodman and seconded by Councilmember Piña to approve Consent Agenda item (C). MOTION carried, 6-1 with Councilmember Jones-Ivey abstaining. REGULAR AGENDA 1. PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING AN APPLICATION FOR AN INTERIM PERMIT AND NEW SERIES 12 (RESTAURANT) LIQUOR LICENSE FOR RAGAZZI NORTHERN ITALIAN CUISINE, LOCATED AT 7850 N. ORACLE ROAD Town Attorney Gary Cohen presented item #1. Mayor Winfield opened the public hearing. No comments were received. Mayor Winfield closed the public hearing. MOTION: A motion was made by Councilmember Rodman and seconded by Councilmember Solomon to approve the issuance of a Series 12 Liquor License to the Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control for Socorro Martinez Borboa -Parker for Ragazzi Northern Italian Cuisine, located at 7850 N. Oracle Road. 12/5/18 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 5 MOTION carried, 7-0. 2. ADOPTING THE 2018 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODES AND 2017 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE AND ASSOCIATED AMENDMENTS THERETO a. RESOLUTION NO. (R)18-50, DECLARING AS PUBLIC RECORDS CERTAIN DOCUMENTS COLLECTIVELY KNOWN AS THE 2018 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODES, AND THE 2017 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE MOTION: A motion was made by Councilmember Rodman and seconded by Councilmember Nicolson to adopt Resolution No. (R)18-50, declaring the 2018 Building Codes and the 2017 National Electrical Code as public records. MOTION carried, 7-0. b. PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE NO. (O)18 -16, ADOPTING CERTAIN DOCUMENTS COLLECTIVELY KNOWN AS THE 2018 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODES, AND THE 2017 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE Mayor Winfield opened the public hearing. The following individual spoke in support of item #2b. Southern Arizona Home Builders Association Government Affairs Director Shawn Cote Mayor Winfield closed the public hearing. Oro Valley Building Official and Inspection & Compliance Division Manager Chuck King presented item # 2b and included the following: - Code History - Building Code and Editions - Events and Disasters - Process - Code Update Benefits Discussion ensued amongst Council and staff regarding item #2b. MOTION: A motion was made by Councilmember Solomon and seconded by Councilmember Rodman to adopt Ordinance No. (O)18-16, adopting the 2018 editions of the International Residential Code, International Building Code, International Plumbing C ode, International Mechanical Code, International Fire Code, International Fuel Gas Code, International Energy Conservation Code, International Property Maintenance Code, International Swimming Pool and Spa Code, and the 2017 edition 12/5/18 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 6 of the National Electrical Code, with amendments thereto, and to repeal all ordinances that are in conflict with these codes and amendments. MOTION carried, 7-0. 3. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING RESOLUTION NO. (R)18-51, AMENDING APPENDIX "B" OF THE TOWN COUNCIL PARLIAMENTARY RULES & PROCEDURES AND CODE OF CONDUCT LIMITING BOARD AND COMMISSION MEMBERS TO TWO CONSECUTIVE TERMS AND CONCLUDING TERMS ON DECEMBER 31, 2018 FOR THOSE MEMBERS GRANTED A THIRD TERM Town Attorney Gary Cohen presented item #3. The following individual spoke in support of item #3. Oro Valley resident Hal Bergsma Discussion ensued among Council and staff regarding item #3. MOTION: A motion was made by Vice Mayor Barrett and seconded by Councilmember Nicolson to adopt Resolution No. (R)18 -51, amending Appendix "B" of the Town Council Parliamentary Rules & Procedures and Code of Conduct to limit board/commission members to two consecutive terms on the same board/commission and conclude terms for those members grated a third term on December 31, 2018. MOTION carried, 4-3 with Councilmember Piña, Councilmember Rodman, and Councilmember Solomon opposed. CALL TO AUDIENCE No comments were received. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS No future agenda items were requested. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: A motion was made by Councilmember Jones -Ivey and seconded by Councilmember Piña to adjourn the meeting at 8:07 p.m. MOTION carried, 7-0. Prepared by: 12/5/18 Minutes, Town Council Regular Session 7 __________________________ Michelle Stine, MMC Deputy Town Clerk I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the regular session of the Town of Oro Valley Council of Oro Valley, Arizona held on the 5th day of December, 2018. I further certify that the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present. Dated this _____ day of ____________________, 2019 . ___________________________ Michael Standish, CMC Town Clerk    Town Council Regular Session B. Meeting Date:01/09/2019   Requested by: Bayer Vella, Community and Economic Development  Submitted By:Hannah Oden, Community and Economic Development Case Number: OV1802410 Information SUBJECT: Request for approval of a Final Plat for the Valley Vista residential development located within the Rancho Vistoso PAD, east of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard along the future Moore Road Loop extension RECOMMENDATION: The Tentative Development Plan for this subdivision was approved by Town Council in 2017 and the Final Site Plan has been conditionally approved by Town Staff. As such, staff recommends approval, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1, of this primarily administrative function as its purpose is to divide the parcels into residential lots for future sale. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The purpose of this request is to consider a Final Plat for the Valley Vista residential subdivision, located east of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard along the future Moore Road Loop extension, as shown on the map to the right. Final plat review is primarily an administrative function as the site design was previously approved through the Tentative Development Plan as part of the rezoning and the Final Site Plan (the plan the Final Plat is based on). The review has been conditionally approved by Town staff based on its conformance with the approved rezoning.  The proposed Final Plat (Attachment 2) consists of two parcels and 168 residential lots subdivided on 56.59 acres with a density of 2.97 homes per acre. The residential design provides four access points off of the future Moore Road Loop extension.  The Final Plat has been reviewed and meets Town requirements and conforms to the approved site design, subject to the conditions of approval included in Attachment 1. BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: The Final Plat requires Town Council approval prior to being officially recorded with Pima County. In 2017, the Town Council approved a General Plan amendment and rezoning for the property which consisted of a single-family residential development, development of Phase 2 of the Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 5 Community Park located at the north end of the subdivision, and construction of the future Moore Road Loop extension. Since then, the Final Site Plan has been conditionally  approved because it conforms to the approved site design and meets all the conditions of approval discussed during the rezoning process.  The Final Plat establishes maintenance access to Pima County for bank protection and specifies access and maintenance responsibilities of common areas. Applicable conditions of approval from the rezoning are included as General Notes on this plat, including the initial funding of improvements to the Big Wash trailhead and construction of Phase 2 of the Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 5 community park.   Proposed Improvements:  56.59 acres subdivided into 168 residential lots with an average size of 7,132 square feet Four access points from the future Moore Road Loop extension Construction of Phase 2 of the Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 5 Community Park Initial funding of improvements for the Big Wash Trailhead  Maximum permitted building height per Medium Density Residential zoning is 30 feet or two stories 12 foot trail easement along the bank protection Construction of the Moore Road Loop extension 2.41 miles of new public streets Sewer lift station at the southern end of the subdivision Previous Approvals:  Prior to 1987: Pima County rezoned the property as Rancho Vistoso PAD, Open Space, Recreation Area/Golf Course, Medium High Density Residential, Commercial (C-1) 1987: Property Annexed into Oro Valley 2009: Major General Plan Amendment approved for this specific area. The request involved the locations for a new park and school, reshaping development areas, and future sewer improvements for the western portion of Big Wash. 2017: Major General Plan Amendment and rezoning approved by Town Council changing the zoning designation to Medium Density Residential within the Rancho Vistoso PAD 2018: Final Site Plan conditionally approved by Town Staff Two minor conditions of approval are included in Attachment 1 to ensure conformance with the approved rezoning. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to APPROVE the Final Plat for the Valley Vista residential subdivision located east of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard along the future Moore Road Loop extension, subject to the conditions in Attachment 1, based on the finding that it meets Town requirements. OR I MOVE to DENY the Final Plat for the Valley Vista residential subdivision located east of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard along the future Moore Road Loop extension, based on the finding that ___________________. Attachments Attachment 1: Conditions of Approval  Attachment 2: Final Plat  Attachment 1 Conditions of Approval Rancho Vistoso Valley Vista Final Plat, Future Moore Road Loop Extension (OV1802410) Planning 1. All Final Design Plans must be revised to match the Final Plat. 2. Common Area ‘A’ between lots 132 and 133 must be a minimum of 15 feet wide. 20 7776 47 44 43 42 132130135 141 143 144 142155154153 10237 36 35 41 40 39 38 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 1918171615 13 12 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 55 54 57 56 65 66 67 68 63 64 69 70 71 72 73 75 61 59 58 60 62 34 33 32 3198 99 100 101 125126127151 150 149 148 159152 145 146 157158134 164 162 163 161 16011211111010910810710610510410312412312212112011911811711611511411386 8788 85 84 83 82 81 80 79 78 94 92 90 89 91 93 96 95 97 14 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 156168 165 166 167 147 140 139 138 137 136 133 131129128LOCATION MAP 3"=1 MILE SHEET INDEXENGINEER DEVELOPER FINAL PLAT RANCHO VISTOSO VALLEY VISTA LOTS 1 THRU 168 & COMMON AREAS "A" & "B" OV1802512 VISTOSO TOWN CENTER BK 61 M&P PG 84 P.A.D. RANCHO VISTOSO PARCEL N BK 58 M&P PG 33 VISTOSO HILLS BK 48 M&P PG 44 ALTERRA AT VISTOSO TRAILS SEQ 20173070030 ZONING: M.H.D.R. AMPHI SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 10 219-54-006D RANCHO VISTOSO PARCEL T NEIGHBORHOOD 5 BK 47 PG 68 MOOREN GEYSER VALLEY STAPPROVALS TOWN ENGINEER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT ASSURANCES WATER ADEQUACY CERTIFICATION RECORDING DATA WATER UTILITY DIRECTOR WATER UTILITY DIRECTOR PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER PLANNING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR CLERK, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY THIS INSTRUMENT WAS FILED FOR RECORD AT THE REQUEST OF THE WLB GROUP, INC., ON THIS DAY OF , 20 , AT M. IN SEQUENCE NO. , THEREOF. OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ON THE DAY OF , 20 . I , CLERK OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS APPROVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL BY: F. ANN RODRIGUEZ, PIMA COUNTY RECORDER DEPUTY FOR PIMA COUNTY RECORDER BY: PETER D. COTE, RLS 44121 BY: MAYOR - TOWN OF ORO VALLEY DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE STATE OF ARIZONA ) FEE COUNTY OF PIMA ) No. ) SS KYLE J MARQUEZ, PE 61771 DATE DATE GENERAL NOTES DATE SECTION LINE EASEMENT LINE PARCEL LINE SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY RIGHT OF WAY FOUND 1/2" REBAR W/ TAG 12214 FOUND MONUMENT 1/2" REBAR W/ TAG TO BE SET BY AN RLS UPON COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTS PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTP.U.E. ZONING BOUNDARY EASEMENTESMT MATCHLINE CENTER LINE NOTARY NOTARY PUBLICMY COMMISSION EXPIRES: STATE OF ARIZONA ) FEE COUNTY OF PIMA ) No. )SS ON THIS, THE DAY OF , 2018, BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED PERSONALLY APPEARED, WHO ACKNOWLEDGED SELF TO BE ____________________ OF ____________________ BEING AUTHORIZED SO TO DO, EXECUTED THE FORGOING INSTRUMENT FOR THE PURPOSE THEREIN CONTAINED BY THEMSELVES AS OWNERS.LOOPUNSUBDIVIDED 219-54-914D PORTIONS OF SECTIONS 25 & 36, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, AND SECTIONS 30 AND 31, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 14 EAST, GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA SEPTEMBER, 2018 1" = 40' Ref#: OV1801740 OV1701630 OV1701068 File:Q:\185050\PH-03 - RV Neigh 5WX\04 Platting\06 F-Plat\5WX-FP.dwg Plot Date:12/27/2018 4:28 PM By:kmarquez74 BL 1 BL2 BL3BL4BL5BL6BL7BL8BL9 BL10 BL11 BL12 BL13 BL14 BL15BL17 B L 1 8 BL19BL21BL22 BL23BL24BL25BL26BL27 BL28 BL29 BL30 BL31 BL32BL33BL 3 4 BL35BL36BL37 B L 3 8 BL16 BL20BC1 BC2BC3BC4BC5BC6BC7BC8 BC9BC10BC11BC12BC13BC14 S00°08'50"E 136.68' DEDICATION 1 2 .2 7.1 8(CONTINUED ON SHEET 2) PORTIONS OF SECTIONS 25 & 36 TOWNSHIP 11, SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST & PORTIONS OF SECTIONS 30 & 31 TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 14 EAST G.& S.R.M., PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA THE WLB GROUP, INC. 4444 E. BROADWAY BLVD. TUCSON, AZ. 85711 (520) 881-7480 ATTN: KYLE MARQUEZ, P.E. KMARQUEZ@WLBGROUP.COM 3030 1924 25 24 19 20 2925 RANCHO VISTOSOBLVD.25 36 32 2930 31 25 3635 26 RANCHO V ISTOSOBLVD. TANGER I N E ROAD 31 3236353631 PULTE GROUP, INC. 3011 WEST INA ROAD TUCSON, AZ 85741 520-219-4694 ATTN: SAM MILLS MANAGER LAND PLANNING & ENTITLEMENTS, ARIZONA DIVISION SAM.MILLS@PULTEGROUP.COM SHEET 1 ........... COVER SHEET SHEET 2 ........... GENERAL NOTES SHEET 3-10....... PLAN SHEETS SHEET 11 .........DATA TABLES SHEET 12 .........DETAILS BASIS OF BEARINGS THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS PROJECT IS THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, G&SRM, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA. SAID BEARING BEING N89°50'40"E. 31 3025 36 E K A L A L A U D R E B A R U N V A L L E Y P L N LAUTERBRUNNEN LNE HAA VALLEY CTE DANUM VALLEY DR I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE BOUNDARY SURVEY SHOWN ON THIS PLAT WAS PERFORMED UNDER MY DIRECTION AND THAT ALL EXISTING AND/OR PROPOSED SURVEY MONUMENTS AND MARKERS SHOWN ARE CORRECTLY DESCRIBED. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECTION. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECTION AND THAT THE 100-YEAR FLOOD PRONE LIMITS, EROSION HAZARD SET-BACKS AND 100-YEAR FEMA ZONE A BOUNDARY AS NOTED WERE REVIEWED AND SHOWN UNDER MY DIRECTION. ASSURANCES IN THE FORM OF __________________ FROM ____________________ AS RECORDED IN SEQUENCE NO. HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO GUARANTEE DRAINAGE AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS (INCLUDING MONUMENTS) AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS (ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, GAS, SEWER, WATER) IN THE SUBDIVISION. ASSURANCES IN THE FORM OF __________________ FROM ____________________ , IN THE AMOUNT OF __________ HAVE BEEN PROVIDED TO GUARANTEE THE RESEEDING OF THIS SUBDIVISION IN THE EVENT THE PROJECT IS ABANDONED. THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY HAS BEEN DESIGNATED BY THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT WATER RESOURCES AS HAVING AN ASSURED WATER SUPPLY, PURSUANT TO ARS 45-576 AND HEREBY CERTIFIES IN WRITING TO SUPPLY WATER TO THIS SUBDIVISION. CA B 31 30 FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE AGENCY. AS TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST NO ___________ ONLY AND NOT OTHERWISE. BRASS DISK SURVEY MONUMENT TO BE SET BY AN RLS UPON COMPLETION OF ROAD CONSTRUCTION FND GLO BRASS CAP AT SECTION CORNER / QUARTER SECTION CORNER WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, HEREBY WARRANT THAT WE ARE ALL AND THE ONLY PARTIES HAVING ANY RECORD TITLE INTEREST IN THE LAND SHOWN ON THIS PLAT AND WE CONSENT TO THE SUBDIVISION OF SAID LAND IN THE MANNER SHOWN HEREON. WE HEREBY CONVEY TO THE PUBLIC ALL RIGHTS-OF-WAY AS SHOWN HEREON INCLUDING ALL STREETS AND EASEMENTS. RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS AS SHOWN HEREON ARE DEDICATED TO PUBLIC UTILITIES AND PIMA COUNTY FOR THE PURPOSE OF INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC SEWERS AND UTILITIES. EXCLUSIVE EASEMENTS FOR TOWN USES AS SHOWN HEREON ARE HEREBY DEDICATED TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY. WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, OUR SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, DO HEREBY SAVE THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, THEIR EMPLOYEES, OFFICERS, AND AGENTS HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES RELATED TO THE USE OF SAID LANDS NOW AND IN THE FUTURE BY REASON OF FLOODING, FLOWAGE, EROSION, OR DAMAGE CAUSED BY WATER, WHETHER SURFACE FLOOD, OR RAINFALL. IT IS FURTHER UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED THAT NATURAL DRAINAGE SHALL NOT BE ALTERED, DISTURBED, OR OBSTRUCTED OTHER THAN AS SHOWN HEREON WITHOUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL. COMMON AREAS "A" & "B" AS SHOWN HEREON AND PRIVATE DRAINAGEWAYS, ARE RESERVED FOR THE PRIVATE USE AND CONVENIENCE OF ALL OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION, THEIR GUESTS AND INVITEES, AND (EXCEPT FOR DRAINAGEWAYS) ARE GRANTED AS EASEMENTS TO ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE UTILITY COMPANIES AND PIMA COUNTY FOR THE PURPOSE OF ACCESS, INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND SEWERS. NO OVERHEAD LINES SHALL BE USED. COMMON AREA "B" SHALL REMAIN AS PERMANENT OPEN SPACE. WE HEREBY GRANT TO THE HOA ALL TRAIL EASEMENTS AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT FOR USE BY THE GENERAL PUBLIC AS PERMANENT, NON-MOTORIZED PUBLIC TRAIL EASEMENTS. WE HEREBY GRANT TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY THE PUBLIC DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT FOR THE PURPOSE OF ACCESS, MAINTENANCE AND FLOWAGE OF STORM WATER. TITLE TO THE LAND OF ALL PRIVATE DRAINAGEWAYS AND COMMON AREAS SHALL BE VESTED IN AN ASSOCIATION OF INDIVIDUAL LOT OWNERS AS ESTABLISHED BY COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS IN SEQUENCE NO. IN THE OFFICE OF THE PIMA COUNTY RECORDER. EACH AND EVERY LOT OWNER WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHALL BE A MEMBER OF THE ASSOCIATION, WHICH WILL ACCEPT ALL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CONTROL, MAINTENANCE, SAFETY AND LIABILITY OF ALL COMMON AREAS AND PRIVATE DRAINAGEWAYS WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION AS SHOWN HEREON. INDICATES DRIVEWAY ACCESS LOCATION __________________________, AS TRUST OFFICER E R O M S D A L E N R D 3025 1.THE GROSS AREA OF THIS SUBDIVISION IS ±56.59 ACRES. 2.TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS IS 168, TOTAL AREA OF NEW LOTS IS ±27.51 ACRES. (2.97 LOTS PER ACRE) 3.EXISTING ZONING: RANCHO VISTOSO PAD: MDR (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) AND RA (RECREATION AREA) 4.COMMON AREA A: (LANDSCAPE, DRAINAGE, & UTILITIES) = ±8.71 ACRES. COMMON AREA B: (PARK) = ±3.35 ACRES. PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY TO BE DEDICATED = ±12.49 ACRES 5.TOTAL MILES OF NEW PUBLIC STREETS IS 2.41 MILES. 6.THE MAXIMUM LOT SIZE FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT IS 13,067 S.F. 7.THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT IS 6,000 S.F. 8.THE AVERAGE LOT SIZE FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT IS 7,118 S.F. 9.MAXIMUM PERMITTED BUILDING HEIGHT: 30' / TWO STORY. 10.SETBACKS REQUIRED/PROVIDED (PERIMETER ONLY, PER P.A.D. M.D.R. STANDARDS): FRONT = 20'; SIDE = 5' OR 0' FOR COMMON WALL ON ZERO LOT LINE; REAR =10'. 11.PARKING SPACES PER LOT PROVIDED = 2 SPACES, ADDITIONAL PARKING PROVIDED = 47. 12.NO FURTHER SUBDIVISION OF ANY PARCEL SHOWN SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL. 13.THE AREA OF THE 100 YEAR FLOOD LIMITS REPRESENT AN AREA THAT MAY BE SUBJECT TO FLOODING FROM A 100 YEAR FREQUENCY FLOOD AND ALL LAND IN THIS AREA WILL BE RESTRICTED TO USES THAT ARE COMPATIBLE WITH FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT AS APPROVED BY THE TOWN ENGINEER. 14.THE BASIS OF BEARING FOR THIS PROJECT IS THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, G&SRM, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA. SAID BEARING BEING N89°50'40"E. 15.MAINTENANCE OF EASEMENTS WITHIN THE LOTS SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNER. MAINTENANCE OF EASEMENTS WITHIN THE COMMON AREAS SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION. 16.THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL CERTIFY AS TO THE FORM, LINE AND FUNCTION OF ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE ROADWAYS AND DRAINAGE STRUCTURES BEFORE THE RELEASE OF ASSURANCES. FND GLO BCSM W1 4 COR SEC. 30 T11S, R14E FND GLO BCSM SW COR SEC. 30 T11S, R14E E HARUA VALLEY RD E N U B R A V A L L E Y P L E ARROWSM I T H R D SEE SHEET 6 FOR SECTION TIES 100 YEAR FLOOD LINE FEMA FLOOD LINE ROADOWNER VP II LOAN LLC 530 EAST MCDOWELL ROAD STE 107 PMG 601 PHOENIX, AZ 85004 PORTIONS OF SECTIONS 25 & 36, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, AND SECTIONS 30 AND 31, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 14 EAST, GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA SEPTEMBER, 2018 1" = 40' Ref#: OV1801740 OV1701630 OV1701068 File:Q:\185050\PH-03 - RV Neigh 5WX\04 Platting\06 F-Plat\5WX-FP.dwg Plot Date:12/27/2018 4:27 PM By:kmarquezGENERAL NOTES (CONTINUED FROM SHEET 1) 17.THE HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION AGREES TO 1) KEEP ALL COMMON AREAS MAINTAINED IN A WEED-FREE, TRASH-FREE CONDITION, 2) REPLACE ANY DEAD PLANT MATERIALS WITHIN 90 DAYS, AND 3) MAINTAIN THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IN PROPER WORKING ORDER. 18.NO IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN THIRTY (30) AND SEVENTY-TWO (72) INCHES IN HEIGHT RELATIVE TO THE ADJACENT ROADWAY WHICH MIGHT INTERFERE WITH THE PURPOSE AND INTENT OF THE SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE SHALL BE PERMITTED, PLACED OR MAINTAINED WITHIN THE SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLES SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. 19.PROPERTY OWNERS SHALL MAINTAIN PLANTINGS TO ENSURE UNOBSTRUCTED VISIBILITY TO MOTORISTS. ALL SHRUBS, ACCENTS AND GROUNDCOVERS SHALL NOT EXCEED THIRTY (30) INCHES IN HEIGHT WITHIN THE SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLES. TREES WITHIN THE SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLES WILL BE MAINTAINED TO ENSURE THAT BRANCHES/FOLIAGE IS NOT BELOW A HEIGHT OF SEVENTY-TWO (72) INCHES. 20.ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY SHALL BE THE WATER SERVICE PROVIDER. 21.INTERIOR PROPERTY CORNERS AND CENTERLINE MONUMENTATION SHALL BE SET AS SOON AS COMPLETION OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE AND IMPROVEMENTS MAKE IT PRACTICAL TO DO SO. IF SUCH MONUMENTS SHOULD DIFFER FROM THE TYPE DESCRIBED ON THE FINAL PLAT, A RECORD OF SURVEY PLAT SHALL BE RECORDED SHOWING THESE DIFFERENCES. 22.ALL PROSPECTIVE BUYERS OF LOTS WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION SHALL BE INFORMED OF THE PRESENCE AND ACTIVITY OF THE LA CHOLLA AIRPARK, A PRIVATE AIRPARK LOCATED SOUTHWEST OF THE PROJECT. ALL PERSPECTIVE BUYERS SHALL BE INFORMED THAT LOW FLYING AIRCRAFT MAY BE A NUISANCE. 23.NO FINAL INSPECTION FOR ANY LOT WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION SHALL BE APPROVED UNTIL A BUILDING CODES OFFICIAL HAS VERIFIED THAT CONSTRUCTION ON THE LOT IS COMPLETE AND SIDEWALKS HAVE BEEN INSTALLED, PROPERTY LINE TO PROPERTY LINE. 24.PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT ASSOCIATED WITH A HOME OR LOT ON PARCEL 5W & 5X, THE DEVELOPER SHALL POST FINANCIAL ASSURANCES IN THE FROM OF A PERFORMANCE BOND EQUAL TO THE AMOUNT OF RECREATION AREA AND AMENITIES AS REQUIRED IN SECTION 26.5 OF THE ZONING CODE, SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR AND PLANNING & ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. IN CASES WHERE THE RECREATIONAL FACILITY IS TO BE PRIVATELY OWNED, RECREATIONAL FACILITIES AND PARKING IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE COMPLETED AND IN PLACE BY THE TIME THIRTY-FIVE PERCENT (35%) OF THE BUILDING PERMITS ARE ISSUED. PRIOR TO RELEASE OF THE REQUIRED BOND OR ASSURANCE, THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE WRITTEN DOCUMENTATION TO THE TOWN THAT ALL MECHANISMS ARE IN PLACE TO PROTECT THE RIGHTS OF THE HOMEOWNERS (I.E., LIABILITY INSURANCE). 25.THE SUBDIVISION SHALL ONLY BE SERVED BY PUBLIC LIFT STATIONS. 26.THIS SUBDIVISION SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF PHASE 2 OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SHOWN IN MASTER RECREATION AREA PLAN, INCLUDING PHASE 2 AMENITIES INCLUDED THEREIN. 27.THE FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE PAVING, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN, AND WILL INCLUDE REVISIONS NECESSARY TO ADDRESS OUTSTANDING DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS FROM TOV. 28.TRAILS, TRAILHEADS AND OTHER PUBLIC RECREATION USES ARE NON-MOTORIZED AND ARE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. 29.THIS SUBDIVISION IS SUBJECT TO REZONING CONDITIONS PER TOWN OF ORO VALLEY REZONING CASE NO. OV1703076 AND ORDINANCE NO. 9O)17-09. SEE NOTES 30-33 FOR SELECT REZONING CONDITIONS ARE LISTED BELOW. 30.IN ADDITION TO REQUIRE NEIGHBORHOOD PARK(S), THE DEVELOPER(S) SHALL IMPROVE AND/OR INITIALLY FUND, AT THE DISCRETION OF THE PARKS & RECREATION DIRECTOR, THE EXISTING PUBLIC USE TRAILHEAD DEPICTED IN EXHIBIT "D." THE REQUIREMENTS BELOW ARE TO BE APPLIED INDEPENDENTLY TO DEVELOPMENT ON THE WESTERN PORTION (ACCESSED BY MOORE ROAD/ARROWSMITH ROAD) AND NORTHERN PORTION (ACCESSED BY RANCHO VISTOSO BLVD ONLY) INDICATED IN THE TENTATIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. ALL TRAILHEAD IMPROVEMENTS DESCRIBED HEREIN SHALL BE FUNDED BY RECREATION IMPACT FEES AS DESCRIBED BELOW: A.THE TRAILHEAD IMPROVEMENTS OR INITIAL FUNDING PROVIDED BY DEVELOPER(S) SHALL NOT EXCEED THE VALUE OF THE REQUIRED PUBLIC RECREATION IMPACT FEE CONTRIBUTION FOR THEIR SUBDIVISION PROJECT. THE DEVELOPER(S) SHALL RECEIVE CORRESPONDING RECREATION IMPACT FEE CREDITS FOR SAID TRAILHEAD IMPROVEMENTS OR INITIAL FUNDING. THE IMPACT FEE CREDITS SHALL ALSO BE APPLICABLE TO DESIGN, PERMITTING, OR OTHER COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH SAID TRAILHEAD IMPROVEMENTS. B.THE TRAILHEAD IMPROVEMENTS OR INITIALS FUNDING SHALL BE COMPLETED AND IN PLACE BY THE TIME THIRTY-FIVE PERCENT (35%) OF THE BUILDING PERMITS ARE ISSUED. C.THE TRAILHEAD IMPROVEMENTS INDICATED IN EXHIBIT "C" SHALL BE IN INSTALLED IN A MANNER AND ORDER AT THE SOLE DISCRETION OF THE PARKS & RECREATION DIRECTOR, ACKNOWLEDGING REASONABLE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING BY DEVELOPER(S). D.IF THE TOWN APPLIES ADDITIONAL RECREATION IMPACT FEE FUNDS FROM OTHER NEARBY DEVELOPMENT TOWARD ADDITIONAL TRAILHEAD IMPROVEMENTS, THE NEXT SUBDIVISION TO DEVELOP SHALL INSTALL THE ADDITIONAL TRAILHEAD IMPROVEMENTS IN ADDITION TO THEIR REQUIRED SHARE, AT THE DISCRETION OF THE PARKS & RECREATION DIRECTOR. E.THE TOWN PARKS & RECREATION DIRECTOR RETAINS THE RIGHT TO PURSUE CONSTRUCTION OF ANY OF THE TRAILHEAD IMPROVEMENTS BY MEANS OTHER THAN THOSE DESCRIBED ABOVE, IN WHICH CASE ONLY THE BALANCE OF ANY SUCH REQUIRED TRAILHEAD IMPROVEMENTS DESCRIBED IN THIS CONDITION SHALL APPLY TO THE DEVELOPERS. 31.THE FUTURE DEVELOPER(S) OF PARCELS 5W AND/OR 5X SHALL COMPLETE THE PHASE 2 OF THE RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 5 COMMUNITY PARK AS SHOWN IN THE APPROVED MASTER RECREATION PLAN (SEE ATTACHMENT 8 OF THE REZONING STAFF REPORT). THE RECREATIONAL AREA SHALL BE COMPLETED AND IN PLACE BY THE TIME THIRTY-FIVE PERCENT (35%) OF THE BUILDING PERMITS ARE ISSUED FOR THE FUTURE HOMES ON THESE PARCELS. 32.ROOFTOP COLORS SHALL BE LIMITED TO DESERT EARTH TONES AND COLORS WHICH BLEND WITH THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT TO LIMIT THE VISUAL IMPACT TO EXISTING PROPERTY OWNERS. 33.APARTMENTS ARE NOT PERMITTED. 34.THE SAME ELEVATION AND COLOR SCHEME MAY NOT BE REPEATED FOR THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ·HOMES IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO ONE ANOTHER ·HOMES LOCATED DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET FROM ONE ANOTHER 35.TWO-STORY HOMES SHALL NOT BE LOCATED ON CORNER LOTS. 36.NO MORE THAN 2 TWO-STORY HOMES SHALL BE LOCATED SIDE BY SIDE ON THE SAME STREET. 37.TWO STORY HOMES SHALL BE LIMITED TO NO MORE THAN 60% OF THE TOTAL LOT COUNT WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT. 38.THE PROPOSED PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT MAY NOT INTERFERE WITH ANY REQUIRED LANDSCAPING IN THE FRONT YARDS (SECTION 27.6.C). 39.LOTS 14-67, 72-86, 90-101, 107-116, AND 128-168 ARE WITHIN A FEMA (S) ZONE A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA (SFHA) AS SHOWN ON FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP (FIRM) PANEL NUMBER 04019C1080L AND 04019C1090L, WITH EFFECTIVE DATE JUNE 16, 2011. A CONDITIONAL LETTER OF MAP REVISION (CLOMR) (CASE # 19-09-0352R) HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY AND SUBMITTED TO FEMA ON NOVEMBER 28, 2018 WITH THE INTENT OF REMOVING THESE LOTS FROM THE FEMA FLOODPLAIN. THE CLOMR DOES NOT GUARANTEE THESE LOTS WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE FEMA SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA (SFHA), THEREFORE FLOODPLAIN USE PERMITS, AND CORRESPONDING ELEVATIONS CERTIFICATES FOR ALL STRUCTURES, LOCATED WITHIN THE EFFECTIVE SFHA SHALL BE REQUIRED UNTIL THE EFFECTIVE FLOODPLAIN HAS BEEN REVISED AND APPROVED BY FEMA. FEDERAL LAW REQUIRES THAT A FLOOD INSURANCE POLICY BE OBTAINED AS A CONDITION OF A FEDERALLY-BACKED MORTGAGE OR LOAN THAT IS SECURED BY A BUILDING LOCATED WITHIN AN EFFECTIVE SFHA. 40.REVISING THE EFFECTIVE FIRM REQUIRES COMPLETION OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE SHOWN IN THE CLOMR, PREPARATION OF AS-BUILT PLANS FOR THE INFRASTRUCTURE, TOWN OF ORO VALLEY AND FEMA REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE AS-BUILT PLANS, FEMA ISSUANCE OF A LETTER OF MAP REVISION (LOMR) AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD. UNLESS AND UNTIL THE EFFECTIVE FIRM HAS BEEN REVISED. THERE IS SOME RISK TO AN OWNER OF ANY LOTS WITHIN THE EFFECTIVE FEMA FLOODPLAIN THAT THE FLOODPLAIN WILL NOT BE REVISED. 41.THE COMMON AREA BETWEEN LOTS 132 AND 133 SHALL HAVE LANDSCAPING MAINTAINED IN PERPETUITY AS SHOWN ON THE CORRESPONDING LANDSCAPE PLAN AND BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOA. 2 SCALE:3"=1 MILE R1-144 ZONING MAP 26 25 35 25 30 30 29 3231313636 35 36 2 1 36 31 1 31 32 6 5 TANGE RI N E R O A D 6 23 24 26 25 24 19 25 30 19 20 30 29 M.D.R. M.H.D.R. M.H.D.R. RECREATION AREA H.D.R. M.D.R. M.D.R. OPEN SPACE RANCHO VISTOSO PAD BOUNDARY LINE TABLE Line # BL1 BL2 BL3 BL4 BL5 BL6 BL7 BL8 BL9 BL10 BL11 BL12 BL13 BL14 BL15 BL16 BL17 BL18 BL19 Length 42.64' 7.43' 207.97' 216.50' 160.07' 275.31' 128.69' 8.41' 85.52' 242.03' 67.96' 59.14' 83.41' 82.80' 107.63' 52.32' 172.73' 454.01' 293.50' Direction N52°30'00"W S51°49'27"E N6°13'04"W N47°46'56"E N2°46'56"E N15°13'04"W N29°46'56"E N26°11'49"W S69°13'15"W N69°21'43"W N54°28'55"W N70°46'15"W N45°01'14"W N46°53'40"W N21°47'23"W N46°52'05"W N15°48'00"E S45°00'00"E N0°08'50"W BL20 BL21 BL22 BL23 BL24 BL25 BL26 BL27 BL28 BL29 BL30 BL31 BL32 BL33 BL34 BL35 BL36 BL37 BL38 134.48' 651.87' 90.74' 127.78' 157.24' 150.19' 982.15' 363.25' 393.21' 80.58' 183.65' 72.86' 598.99' 157.82' 201.03' 226.34' 121.76' 404.18' 765.90' N0°08'50"W S26°11'49"E S50°19'05"E S25°55'31"E S25°52'21"E S17°40'46"E S0°31'31"E N89°31'12"W S89°31'12"E S26°57'44"W S0°01'07"W S10°55'40"W S5°15'42"W S24°28'30"W S33°52'50"E S5°01'57"E S49°29'10"W N80°00'00"W N52°30'00"W CURVE DATA CURVE BC1 BC2 BC3 BC4 BC5 BC6 BC7 BC8 BC9 BC10 BC11 BC12 BC13 BC14 LENGTH 369.96' 316.57' 588.11' 441.39' 176.56' 490.09' 549.09' 39.02' 382.03' 134.71' 191.14' 265.99' 240.66' 52.02' RADIUS 400.00' 562.00' 624.00' 562.00' 562.00' 624.00' 562.00' 258.00' 624.00' 624.00' 570.00' 270.00' 350.00' 440.00' DELTA 52°59'33" 32°16'29" 54°00'00" 45°00'00" 18°00'00" 45°00'00" 55°58'45" 8°39'56" 35°04'41" 12°22'09" 19°12'48" 56°26'44" 39°23'48" 6°46'24" CHORD BEARING N32°17'36"E N9°55'10"E N20°46'56"E N25°16'56"E N6°13'04"W N7°16'56"E N1°47'34"E S30°31'47"E S8°39'29"E S14°57'39"W S14°52'06"W S3°44'52"E S14°13'37"E S53°23'11"W DISTANCE 356.91' 312.40' 566.58' 430.14' 175.83' 477.59' 527.51' 38.98' 376.09' 134.45' 190.25' 255.37' 235.95' 51.99' 1 2 .2 7.1 8 FL1 FL2FL3 F L 4 FL 5 FL 6 FL7 F L 8 FL9FL10 FL11F L 1 2 FL 1 3 FL 1 4 F L 1 5 F L 1 6 F L 1 7 F L 1 8FL19F L 2 0FL21FL22FL23FL24 145,748 sq.ft 3.35 acres 1 0 0 YEAR F LOOD L INE 105. 9 5 ' 15.8 8 'S0°08'50"E 136.68'Z O N E ' A ' Z O N E ' X ' F E M A F L O O D L I N E S26°11'49 "E 651 .87 ' N26°11'49"W 8.41' S69°13' 1 5 " W 8 5. 5 2' N69° 2 1 ' 4 3 " W 2 4 2 . 0 3 ' N5 4 ° 2 8 ' 5 5 " W 67 . 9 6 ' N70° 4 6 ' 1 5 " W 59.14 'N45°01'14"W 83.41'N46°53'40"W 82.80'N21°47'23 "W107.63 ' N 4 6 ° 5 2 ' 0 5 " W 5 2 . 3 2 'N15°48'00"E172.73'S45°00'00"E 454.01'N0°08'50"W 293.50'N0°08'50"W 134.48'R=258.00' L=39.02' Δ=8°39'56"S26°11'49 "E 633 .35 'S26°11'49 "E 561 .52 'R=593.00'L=579.37'Δ=55°58'45"MOORE LOOP ROADCOMMON AREA B PROPOSED 100-YEAR CLOMR FEMA FLOODPLAIN TRAIL AND TOV BANK PROTECTION MAINTENANCE & ACCESS ESMT PER SEPARATE INSTRUMENT PROPOSED 100-YEAR CLOMR FEMA FLOODPLAIN 2.5' TRAIL ESMT PER SEPARATE INSTRUMENT PORTIONS OF SECTIONS 25 & 36, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, AND SECTIONS 30 AND 31, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 14 EAST, GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA SEPTEMBER, 2018 1" = 40' Ref#: OV1801740 OV1701630 OV1701068 File:Q:\185050\PH-03 - RV Neigh 5WX\04 Platting\06 F-Plat\5WX-FP.dwg Plot Date:12/24/2018 12:42 PM By:kmarquez120'0'40'80'0'0'0' 3 4 5 6 7 89 INDEX MAP 1" = 1000' 10 31' 31' VP II LOAN LLC 71.22% ET AL 219-20-914C ZONING=PAD MOORE LOOP ROAD (PUBL IC ) 1 2 .2 4.1 8SHEET 4 ALTERRA AT VISTOSO TRAILS SEQ 20173070030 ZONING: M.H.D.R. 100' E L E C T R I C E A S E M E N T BK. 75 3 M I S C . P G . 3 6 4 CONSERVATION EASEMENT DKT. 11873, PG. 363 COMMON AREA D COMMON AREA E COMMON AREA D E MOORE ROAD COMMON AREA C ALTERRA AT VISTOSO TRAILS ALTERRA AT VISTOSO TRAILS ALTERRA AT VISTOSO TRAILS70'FND GLO BCSM W1 4 COR SEC. 30 T11S, R14E (PUBLIC STREET) SEQ 20173070030 VP II LOAN LLC 71.22% ET AL 219-21-627K ZONING=PAD HOHOKAM MESA BK. 61 M&P, PG. 84 ZONING: M.H.D.R. CONSERVATION EASEMENT DKT. 11873, PG. 363 31' 31' 25' 25'10' PUE25'25'6,191 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,042 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,126 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,688 sq.ft 0.15 acres 6,239 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,635 sq.ft 0.15 acres 6,688 sq.ft 0.15 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 7,273 sq.ft 0.17 acres 6,623 sq.ft 0.15 acres 6,688 sq.ft 0.15 acres 7,896 sq.ft 0.18 acres 69,458 sq.ft 1.59 acres (PUBLIC) (PUBL IC )N0°28'48"E27.24'S25°52'21 "E 153 .89 '20' SEWER EASEMENT PER THISPLAT SEE DETAIL SHEET 12154.74'10' PU E TRAIL AND RFCD BANK PROTECTION MAINTENANCE AND ACCESS ESMT PER THIS PLAT 12' TRAIL ESMT PER SEPARATE INSTRUMENT RFCD BANK PROTECTION MAINTENANCE & ACCESS ESMT PER SEPARATE INSTRUMENT 2.13' (ESMT TIE)ZONE 'A'ZONE 'X'FEMA FLOOD LINEC10 C44S12°16'38"E 120.68'C46 S89°31'12"E 200.00' N64°0 7' 3 9" E 1 2 0. 0 0'N15°17'13"E 63.29'S64°0 7' 3 9" W 1 2 0. 0 0' N64°0 7' 3 9" E 1 2 0. 0 0' N64°0 7' 3 9" E 1 2 0. 0 0' N69°09' 4 4 " E 1 2 0. 0 0' N74°37'1 6 " E 1 2 0 . 0 0' S80°04'48"W 1 2 0 . 0 0 ' S85°32'19"W 120.00' N89°31'12"W 120.00'N0°28'48"E 120.00'N0°28'48"E 121.68'S0°28'48"W 123.36'S0°28'48"W 123.90'S0°28'48"W 4.74'C168C179C183C185C1863.89'50.00 ' C 1 9 2 C193 2.21'C194C196C19760.17'29.21' 11.56' 50.03'50.03'13.21' 4.74'C200C201C202C203C2043.89'L6S0°27'16"W51.00'C211L=283.35'N89°31'12"W 120.00' EC221EL17 R=624.00'Δ=45°00'00"L=490.09'N29°46'56"E 128.69'R=562.00'Δ=55°58'45"L=549.09'R=624.00'Δ=35°04'41"L=382.03'S 5 0 ° 1 9 ' 0 5 " E 9 0 . 7 4 'S25°55'31 "E 127 .78 'S25°52'21 "E 157 .24 'S17°40'46"E 150.19'R=593.00'Δ=55°58'45"L=579.37'S29°46'56"W 128.69'R=624.00'Δ=20°54'04"L=227.63'S29°46'56"W 128.69'R=562.00'Δ=22°02'07"L=216.14'C 3 3 S87°35'44"E 124.83'S89°31'12"E 89.39'R=475.00'Δ=19°58'18"L=165.57'C3 4R=51.00'Δ=243°40'23"L =2 1 6 .9 0 'S25°52'21 "E 56 .10 'R=525.00'Δ=26°21'08"L=241.47'N87°35'44"W 124.83' N64°0 7' 3 9" E 26.00'S25°52'21 "E 56 .10 'R=500.00'Δ=26°21'08"L=229.97'S89°31'12"E 139.96' S87°35'44"E 183.16'50.00'50.00'50.00'50.00'50.00'50.00'50.00 '50.00 '50.00 'S0°28'48"W 672.30'R=593.00'Δ=45°00'00"L=465.74'PROPOSED SLOPE AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE TOV BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT PROPOSED SLOPE AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE TOV BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT BEGIN RFCD BANK PROTECTION MAINTENANCE & ACCESS ESMT PER SEPARATE INSTRUMENT TOWN OF ORO VALLEY BANK PROTECTION MAINTENANCE & ACCESS ESMT PER SEPARATE INSTRUMENT PROPOSED 100-YEAR CLOMR FEMA FLOODPLAIN PROPOSED 100-YEAR CLOMR FEMA FLOODPLAIN 2.5' TRAIL ESMT PER SEPARATE INSTRUMENT PORTIONS OF SECTIONS 25 & 36, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, AND SECTIONS 30 AND 31, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 14 EAST, GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA SEPTEMBER, 2018 1" = 40' Ref#: OV1801740 OV1701630 OV1701068 File:Q:\185050\PH-03 - RV Neigh 5WX\04 Platting\06 F-Plat\5WX-FP.dwg Plot Date:12/24/2018 12:35 PM By:kmarquez120'0'40'80'0'0'0' 3 4 5 6 7 89 INDEX MAP 1" = 1000' 10 SHEET 3 SHEET 5(PUBLIC)VP II LOAN LLC 71.22% ET AL 219-21-627K ZONING=PAD VP II LOAN LLC 71.22% ET AL 219-21-914C ZONING=PAD 1 2 .2 4.1 8VP II LOAN LLC 71.22% ET AL 219-21-627K ZONING=PAD 154.74'31' 31' 25'25'25'25'10' PUE 10' PUE25'25'10' PUE 10' PUE 53.62'106.45'N8°58'50"W60.83'53,285 sq.ft 1.22 acres 13,067sq.ft 0.34 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 7,702 sq.ft 0.18 acres 8,516 sq.ft 0.20 acres 7,941 sq.ft 0.18 acres 7,761 sq.ft 0.18 acres 8,096 sq.ft 0.19 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,100 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,020 sq.ft 0.14 acres 7,794 sq.ft 0.18 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,166 sq.ft 0.14 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres (PUBLIC)645.06'N0°28'48"E27.24'(PUBLIC)S87°13'04"E S87°13'04"E S87°13'04"E S87°13'04"E 69,458 sq.ft 1.59 acres 69,458 sq.ft 1.59 acres S0°28'48"W 420.00'N0°28'48"ES0°28'48"W154.74'(PUBLIC) 12' TRAIL ESMT PER TRAIL AND RFCD BANK PROTECTION MAINTENANCE AND ACCESS ESMT PER THIS PLAT TRAIL AND RFCD BANK PROTECTION MAINTENANCE AND ACCESS ESMT PER THIS PLAT 12' TRAIL ESMT PER SEPARATE INSTRUMENT RFCD BANK PROTECTION MAINTENANCE & ACCESS ESMT PER SEPARATE INSTRUMENT 2.59' (ESMT TIE)ZONE 'A'ZONE 'X'FEMA FLOOD LINEC45 C10 C44S2°46'56"W 134.93'S2°48'18"W 124.95'S2°46'56"W 125.00'S2°46'56"W 125.00'N89°31'12"W 129.53' S89°31'12"E 133.56' N89°31'12"W 125.00' S89°31'12"E 125.00' S89°31'12"E 125.00' S89°31'12"E 125.00' N89°31'12"W 125.00' S89°31'12"E 120.00' N89°31'12"W 120.00'N0°28'48"E 121.16'S0°28'48"W 120.00'N0°28'48"E 120.00'C46 S89°31'12"E 120.00' N89°31'12"W 202.08'N0°28'48"E 122.84'S0°28'48"W 106.72'N0°28'48"E 300.00'N0°28'48"E 150.00'S89°31'12"E 120.00' N89°31'12"W 120.00' N89°31'12"W 120.00' S89°31'12"E 120.00' S89°31'12"E 120.00' S89°31'12"E 125.00' S89°31'12"E 125.00' S89°31'12"E 125.00' S89°31'12"E 125.00' S89°31'12"E 125.00' N89°31'12"W 125.00' S89°31'12"E 125.00' N89°31'12"W 125.00' 60.00' 48.12' C141 C143 C144C145C15542.00'8.00' 4.74'C19760.17'29.21'50.03' 45.66'50.03'29.14' 9.96' 50.00'30.00' C198 C199 125.00'8.61'N0°28'48"E 166.80'60.00'N89°31'12"W 125.00' 4.74' L 5L=182.39'N89°31'12"W 125.52' N89°31'12"W 120.00'50.00'50.00'60.00'N49°45'24"E 102.74'N0°08'50"W 2628.48'EL13 EL14 EL15 EL16 60.00'N2°46'56"E 160.07'R=562.00'Δ=18°00'00"L=176.56'N15°13'04"W 275.31'R=624.00'Δ=S0°31'31"E 982.15'N89°31'12"W 363.25'S15°13'04"E 275.31'R=593.00'Δ=18°00'00"L=186.30'S2°46'56"W 160.07'S87°35'44"E 124.83'S89°31'12"E 89.39'S0°28'48"W 626.88'S9°54'32"E 50.00'C30N76°29' 4 7 " W 4 8 . 1 2 ' N87°13'04"W 77.04'C27S2°46'56"W 56.45'C310C 2 8 S87°13'04"E 109.46'C29N0°28'48"E 583.61'C 3 1 N89°31'12"W 89.96'N87°35'44"W 124.83'C32R=562.00'Δ=12°16'47"L=120.45'S15°13'04"E 275.31'R=624.00'Δ=18°00'00"L=196.04'S2°46'56"W3.62'S0°28'48"W 672.30'S89°31'12"E 139.96' S87°35'44"E 183.16' N87°13'04"W 176.92'C960.00'60.00'60.00'60.00'60.00'60.00'60.00'60.00'50.00'50.00'50.00'50.00'50.00'52.08'50.00'50.00'50.00'50.00'60.00'60.00'60.00'60.00'60.00'60.00'60.00'52.13'60.00'60.00'60.00'60.00'60.00'60.00'60.00'50.00'60.00'60.00'60.00'60.00'50.00'50.00'50.00'S0°28'48"W 672.30'R=593.00'Δ=45°00'00"L=465.74'R=624.00'Δ=45°00'00"L=490.09'PROPOSED SLOPE AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE TOV BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT PROPOSED SLOPE AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE TOV BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT N89°31'12"W 125.52' 30' WIDE ACCESS EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF LOT 131 AND 132C234 PROPOSED 100-YEAR CLOMR FEMA FLOODPLAIN PROPOSED 100-YEAR CLOMR FEMA FLOODPLAIN 67' S64 ° 3 3 ' 2 3 " E 7 5 . 8 6 ' 5' TRAIL EASEMENT PER THIS PLAT PORTIONS OF SECTIONS 25 & 36, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, AND SECTIONS 30 AND 31, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 14 EAST, GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA SEPTEMBER, 2018 1" = 40' Ref#: OV1801740 OV1701630 OV1701068 File:Q:\185050\PH-03 - RV Neigh 5WX\04 Platting\06 F-Plat\5WX-FP.dwg Plot Date:12/27/2018 4:35 PM By:kmarquez120'0'40'80'0'0'0' 3 4 5 6 7 89 INDEX MAP 1" = 1000' 10 VP II LOAN LLC 71.22% ET AL 219-21-627K ZONING=PAD VP II LOAN LLC 71.22% ET AL 219-21-914C ZONING=PAD 1 2 .2 7.1 8SHEET 6 SHEET 4 (PUBLIC) 10' PUE 3 1 ' 3 1 '25'25'170.05'2 2 9 . 1 7 ' 7 3 . 5 1 ' 9,078 sq.ft 0.21 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 7,624 sq.ft 0.18 acres 9,078 sq.ft 0.21 acres 9,078 sq.ft 0.21 acres 6,348 sq.ft 0.15 acres 6,348 sq.ft 0.15 acres 6,755 sq.ft 0.16 acres 10,934 sq.ft 0.25 acres 10,934 sq.ft 0.25 acres 11,020 sq.ft 0.25 acres 6,249 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,232 sq.ft 0.14 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 9,626 sq.ft 0.22 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 10,168 sq.ft 0.23 acres 7,594 sq.ft 0.17 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,572 sq.ft 0.15 acres 7,500 sq.ft 9,988 sq.ft 0.23 acres 6,388 sq.ft 0.15 acres (PUBLIC)(P U B L I C ) 260,356 sq.ft 5.98 acres 260,356 sq.ft 5.98 acres 122,039 sq.ft 2.80 acres S87°13'04"E S87°13'04"E S87°13'04"E 10' PUE1 0 ' PUE10' PUE10' PUE( P U B L I C ) S89°31'12"E 165.06' S89°31'12"E 2593.91' (CALCULATED) FND GLO BCSM 30' ELECTRIC ESMT DKT. 7268, PG. 1190 DKT. 8065, PG. 986 12' TRAIL ESMT PER SEPARATE INSTRUMENT RFCD BANK PROTECTION MAINTENANCE & ACCESS ESMT PER SEPARATE INSTRUMENT 2.59' (ESMT TIE) 12' TRAIL ESMT PER SEPARATE INSTRUMENT 12' TRAIL ESMT PER SEPARATE INSTRUMENT RFCD BANK PROTECTION MAINTENANCE & ACCESS ESMT PER SEPARATE INSTRUMENT RFCD BANK PROTECTION MAINTENANCE & ACCESS ESMT PER SEPARATE INSTRUMENTZONE 'A 'ZONE 'X 'FEMA FLOOD LINES5 5 ° 1 3 ' 0 2 " E 3 8 8 . 9 8 'S34°46'58"W26.00'S 4 7 ° 1 8 ' 3 6 " E 1 3 9 . 6 8 ' N88°15'26"E 141.94'N42°29'39"E 119.90'N42°29'39"E 100.00'S42°29'39"W 100.00'C69C70C71C72C7 3C74C75C76 C77 C78 C79C80C81C82C83 C84C85 C8633.58'45.00'40.00'38.58'50.00'69.90'72.09'69.84' 6 9 . 8 4 ' 6 9 . 8 4 '69.84'78.41'5 0 . 0 0 ' 5 0 . 0 0 ' 5 0 . 0 0 ' 5 0 . 0 0 ' 3 9 . 5 8 ' 39 . 2 6 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 'C132C133 C134C135C47 C68C87C88C1 0 9 9. 0 3 ' C205 S6 2 ° 2 5 ' 2 9 " E 60. 4 8 ' N 4 7 ° 3 0 ' 2 1 " W 2 5 0 . 0 0 ' S5 5 ° 1 3 ' 0 2 " E 2 9 7 . 3 9 ' S 4 4 ° 2 9 ' 4 8 " E 5 1 . 0 0 ' N62°2 0' 4 2" E 51.00'L=411.01'L=54.73'R=624.00'Δ=54°00'00"L=588.11'60.00'S42°29'39"W54.29'S42°29'39"W50.00'N5 5 ° 1 3 ' 0 2 " W 5 1 2 . 6 1 ' C 2 0 9L=304.79'L=136.60'N49°45'24"E 102.74'N0°01'03"W 2642.78'S3 4 ° 3 2 ' 1 1 "E 7 7 . 1 1 'N0°08'50"W 2628.48'N47°46'56"E 216.50'R=562.00'Δ=45°00'00"L=441.39'N89°31'12"W 363.25'R=624.00'Δ=12°22'09"L=134.71'S89°31'12"E 393.21'S26°57'44"W 80.58'S0°01'07"W 183.65'S10°55'40"W 72.86'S5°15'42"W 598.99'R=593.00'Δ=45°00'00"L=465.74'S47°46'56"W 216.50'R=593.00'Δ=54°00'00"L=558.89'S 4 7 ° 3 0 ' 2 1 " E 1 2 5 . 1 0 'R=624.00'Δ=16°55'49"L=184.38'C35C25 N42°29'39"E 78.58'R =5 1 .0 0 'Δ=268 °19 ' 1 5"L=238.84'S42°29'39"W 78.58'C26S 4 7 ° 3 0 ' 2 1 " E 2 3 . 5 1 'R=300.00'Δ=52°46'03"L=276.29'S5°15'42"W 305.98'N5 5 ° 1 3 ' 0 2 " W 3 8 8 . 9 7 'R=51.00'Δ=244 °1 3 '4 3 "L=217.3 9 'C24S5 5 ° 1 3 ' 0 2 " E 3 0 6 . 1 2 ' C23 C22 N5°15'42"E 119.60'R=250.00'Δ=52°46'03"L=230.24'N 4 7 ° 3 0 ' 2 1 " W 2 4 8 . 6 1 ' C36 C37S47°46'56"W 216.50'R=562.00'Δ=54°00'00"L=529.67'S 4 7 ° 3 0 ' 2 1 " E 3 0 2 . 6 8 'S5°15'42"W 305.98'N36°37'43"E 120.00'S34°46'58"W 125.00'N34°46'58"E 125.00'N34°46'58"E 125.00'N34°46'58"E 125.00'N34°46'58"E 125.00'N34°46'58"E 125.00'S34°46'58"W 134.76'S62°2 0' 4 2" W 8 8. 8 7'S34°46'58"W 125.00'S34°46'58"W 125.00'S34°46'58"W 125.00'N34°46'58"E 125.00'N34°46'58"E 125.00'N17°18'03"E 125.42'N85°38'54"W 125.00' S82°52'24"W 125 . 0 0 ' S71°23' 4 2 " W 1 2 5. 0 0' N59°5 5' 0 0" E 1 2 5. 0 0'N47°04'38"E 119.58'N42°29'39"E 120.00'S42°29'39"W 120.00'N42°29'39"E 120.00'S42°29'39"W 120.00'S42°29'39"W 120.00' S 4 7 ° 3 0 ' 2 1 " E 1 2 4 . 4 9 ' N 4 7 ° 3 0 ' 2 1 " W 1 2 5 . 0 0 ' S 4 7 ° 3 0 ' 2 1 " E 1 4 2 . 5 2 ' N 4 7 ° 3 0 ' 2 1 " W 1 2 0 . 0 0 'S1°44'34"E 120.00'S42°41'24"W 120.00' S87°07'22"W 120.00' S 4 7 ° 3 0 ' 2 1 " E 1 2 6 . 4 4 ' S 4 7 ° 3 0 ' 2 1 " E 1 4 9 . 3 1 ' N 4 7 ° 3 0 ' 2 1 " W 1 2 5 . 0 0 ' N 4 7 ° 3 0 ' 2 1 " W 1 2 5 . 4 7 ' N 4 7 ° 3 0 ' 2 1 " W 1 2 7 . 0 9 ' S 4 7 ° 3 0 ' 2 1 " E 1 2 5 . 0 0 ' N84°44'18"W 125.00' N84°44'18"W 125.0 0 ' 58 . 9 7 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 26 . 8 6 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 57 . 3 9 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 30 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 '60.00'60.00'55.24'50.00'50.00'50.00'50.00'5 0 . 0 0 ' 5 0 . 0 0 ' 5 0 . 0 0 ' 5 0 . 0 0 ' 5 0 . 0 0 '60.00'60.00'55.24'60.00'60.00'60.00'R=275.00'Δ=52°46'03"L=253.27'C8 S42°29'39"W 192.68'S2°52'38"E 148.25'60 . 0 0 ' N 4 7 ° 3 0 ' 2 1 " W 1 2 1 . 5 7 ' N84°44'18"W 125.00 'S5°15'42"W 305.98'N34°46'58"E 125.00'PROPOSED SLOPE AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE TOV BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT PROPOSED SLOPE AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE TOV BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT PROPOSED SLOPE AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE TOV PROPOSED 100-YEAR CLOMR FEMA FLOODPLAIN PROPOSED 100-YEAR CLOMR FEMA FLOODPLAIN (P U B L I C ) RFCD BANK PROTECTION MAINTENANCE & ACCESS ESMT PER SEPARATE INSTRUMENT PORTIONS OF SECTIONS 25 & 36, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, AND SECTIONS 30 AND 31, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 14 EAST, GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA SEPTEMBER, 2018 1" = 40' Ref#: OV1801740 OV1701630 OV1701068 File:Q:\185050\PH-03 - RV Neigh 5WX\04 Platting\06 F-Plat\5WX-FP.dwg Plot Date:12/27/2018 4:10 PM By:kmarquez120'0'40'80'0'0'0' 3 4 5 6 7 89 INDEX MAP 1" = 1000' 10 VP II LOAN LLC 71.22% ET AL 219-21-627K ZONING=PAD VP II LOAN LLC 71.22% ET AL 219-21-914C ZONING=PAD 1 2 .2 7.1 8SHEET 7 SHEET 5 (PUBLIC)130' DRAINAGE, MAINTENANCEAND ACCESS EASEMENTGRANTED TO THE TOWN OFORO VALLEY UNDERSEPARATE COVERTO BE DEDICATED TO PIMA COUNTY AS OPEN SPACE TO BE DEDICATED TO PIMA COUNTY AS OPEN SPACE 31'31' C6 34 5 . 6 3 '224.79'135.55'135.93'170.05'FL25FL26 FL 2 7 FL 2 8 FL 2 9 FL30FL31FL32FL33F L 3 4 FL35 FL 3 6FL37FL 3 8 F L 3 9 FL40FL41 FL42 FL43 FL 4 4 FL45FL46 FL47 FL48FL49FL50 FL51FL52 FL5 3 FL 5 4 FL 5 5 FL56 FL57FL58F L 5 9 FL60 FL 6 1 F L 6 2 FL63 FL 6 4 FL65FL66 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 6,003 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 7,624 sq.ft 0.18 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,085 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,997 sq.ft 0.16 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,888 sq.ft 0.16 acres 6,645 sq.ft 0.15 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 7,776 sq.ft 0.18 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,851 sq.ft 0.16 acres 6,294 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,386 sq.ft 0.15 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 10,168 sq.ft 0.23 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 9,749 sq.ft 0.22 acres 9,749 sq.ft 0.22 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,487 sq.ft 0.15 acres 7,527 sq.ft 0.17 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 9,263 sq.ft 0.21 acres 6,000 sq.ft 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 7,532 sq.ft 0.17 acres 8,370 sq.ft 0.19 acres 8,560 sq.ft 0.20 acres (P U B L I C ) (P U B L I C ) 100 YEAR FLOOD LINE 10 0 Y E A R F L O O D L I N E S5 3 ° 2 2 ' 1 7 " E 2 4 0 . 0 0 ' 260,356 sq.ft 5.98 acres 260,356 sq.ft 5.98 acres 260,356 sq.ft 5.98 acres (PUBLIC)(PUBLIC)S24°28'30"W250.00'S24°28'30"WS24°28'30"WS5 3 ° 2 2 ' 1 7 " E 2 1 2 . 8 3 '10' PUE10' PUE10' PUE10' PUE10' PUE10' PUE31' 31' TRAIL ESMT PER SEPARATE INSTRUMENT RFCD BANK PROTECTION MAINTENANCE & ACCESS ESMT PER SEPARATE INSTRUMENT TRAIL AND RFCD BANK PROTECTION MAINTENANCE AND TRAIL AND RFCD BANK PROTECTION MAINTENANCE AND ACCESS ESMT PER THIS PLAT 12' TRAIL ESMT PER SEPARATE INSTRUMENT RFCD BANK PROTECTION MAINTENANCE & ACCESS ESMT PER SEPARATE INSTRUMENT S5°15'42"W 305.98'C93N36°37'43"E26.00'S36°37'43"W60.20'S65 ° 3 1 ' 3 0 " E 72.2 2 ' S84°44'18"E 37.51' S5 5 ° 1 3 ' 0 2 " E 3 8 8 . 9 8 'C6530.22'C6710.75' C69 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' C8 9 C90 C91 C92 C9 4 C9 5 C96C99 C100 C1 0 3 C1 0 4 C1 0 6 C1 0 7 C10 8 C110 C111C128C12910.75' 18 . 7 5 ' C133 C57C66C87 N5 5 ° 1 3 ' 0 2 " W 5 1 2 . 6 1 'C116C1306.99' N83°15'32"W 92.09'C1 3 9 C2 0 7 N 5 3 ° 2 2 ' 1 7 " W 3 3 2 . 6 7 ' S5 3 ° 2 2 ' 1 7 " E 4 6 8 . 7 5 ' S65 ° 3 1 ' 3 0 " E 27.2 2 ' C2 0 8 S62 ° 2 5 ' 2 9 " E 60. 4 8 ' C2 3 1 C2 3 2N0°00'00"E 49.22'C10 2 C210S11°01'22"W51.00'N61°4 0' 5 3" E 51.00' L= 2 .3 9 'L=41.22 ' N5 5 ° 1 3 ' 0 2 " W 5 1 2 . 6 1 ' 60 . 0 0 ' EC220 EL12 S5°15'42"W 598.99'C18 S5°15'42"W 598.99'R=570.00'Δ=19°12'48"L=191.14'S24°28'30"W 157.82'R=270.00'Δ=56°26'44"L=265.99'=369.96'S51°49'27"E 7.43'R=562.00'Δ=32°16'29"L=316.57'N6°13'04"W 207.97'S6°13'04"E 207.97'R=593.00'Δ=36°00'00"L=372.59'S29°46'56"W 125.00'S5°15'42"W 305.98'C19S24°28'30"W 360.34'C14S36°37'43"W 10.20'C12N 5 3 ° 2 2 ' 1 7 " W 6 0 8 . 4 7 'R=51.00'Δ=244 °1 3 '4 3 "L=217.3 9'C40C13 N36°37'43"E10.20'N24°28'30"E 174.79'C39N65 ° 3 1 ' 3 0 " W 22.2 2 ' C1 5 N 5 3 ° 2 2 ' 1 7 " W 3 0 6 . 8 5 ' C16R=51.00'Δ=244°13'43"L=217.3 9 'S5 3 ° 2 2 ' 1 7 " E 3 8 9 . 7 0 ' C1 7 S65 ° 3 1 ' 3 0 " E 22.2 2 'N24°28'30"E 85.55'C20N5°15'42"E 86.22'C3 8 C21 N5 5 ° 1 3 ' 0 2 " W 3 8 8 . 9 7 ' S5 5 ° 1 3 ' 0 2 " E 3 0 6 . 1 2 ' C23 C22 N5°15'42"E 119.60'S6°13'04"E 207.97'R=624.00'Δ=36°00'00"L=392.07'S29°46'56"W 81.29'S5°15'42"W 305.98'S24°28'30"W 360.34'S5 3 ° 2 2 ' 1 7 " E 3 8 9 . 7 1 'S36°37'43"W26.00'N 5 3 ° 2 2 ' 1 7 " W 6 0 8 . 4 7 'S37°30'00"W 120.00'S37°30'00"W 120.00'S36°37'43"W 125.00'S36°37'43"W 125.00'S36°37'43"W 125.00'N36°37'43"E 125.00'S36°37'43"W 125.00'S60°1 5' 0 9" W 8 4. 9 1'S36°37'43"W 125.00'S36°37'43"W 125.00'S36°37'43"W 125.00'N36°37'43"E 125.00'S36°37'43"W 125.00'N36°37'43"E 125.00'N36°37'43"E 125.00'S65 ° 3 1 ' 3 0 " E 1 5 0 . 0 0 ' S65 ° 3 1 ' 3 0 " E 1 2 9 . 7 4 ' N65 ° 3 1 ' 3 0 " W 1 5 0 . 0 0 ' S65 ° 3 1 ' 3 0 " E 1 2 0 . 0 0 ' S65 ° 3 1 ' 3 0 " E 1 2 0 . 0 0 ' S65 ° 3 1 ' 3 0 " E 1 2 0 . 0 0 ' S65 ° 3 1 ' 3 0 " E 1 2 0 . 0 0 ' S65 ° 3 1 ' 3 0 " E 1 2 0 . 0 0 ' N65 ° 3 1 ' 3 0 " W 1 2 0 . 4 4 ' S70° 3 9 ' 3 9 " E 1 2 5 . 0 0 'N24°28'30"E 119.49'N27°32'49"E 120.00'N36°37'43"E 120.00'S34°17'30"W 120.00'S36°37'43"W 120.00'N36°37'43"E 120.00'S36°37'43"W 120.00'N36°37'43"E 120.00'S36°37'43"W 120.00'S11°01'22"W 80.96'N36°37'43"E 120.00'S36°37'43"W 129.08'S36°37'43"W 120.00'N36°37'43"E 120.00'N36°37'43"E 120.00'N36°37'43"E 120.00'N36°37'43"E 120.00'N36°37'43"E 120.00'N36°37'43"E 120.00'N36°37'43"E 120.00'N29°35'53"E 120.00'N24°28'30"E 119.49'N6°58'43"E 124.67'N20°45'47"E 136.51'S34°32'50"W 125.00'S34°46'58"W 125.00'N34°46'58"E 125.00'N34°46'58"E 125.00'N34°46'58"E 125.00'N34°46'58"E 125.00'N34°46'58"E 125.00'N34°46'58"E 125.00'N34°46'58"E 125.00'N17°18'03"E 125.42'N85°38'54"W 125.00' N84°44'18"W 125.00 ' N84°44'18"W 125.00 ' N84°44'18"W 125.00 ' S84°44'18"E 125.00' S84°44'18"E 125.00' 50 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 32 . 7 7 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 '50.00'50.00'50.00'50.00'50.00'50.00'50.00'50.00'30.12'50.00'50.00'50.00'50.00'92 . 0 9 ' 60 . 5 1 ' 58 . 9 7 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 26 . 8 6 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 18 . 7 5 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 32 . 6 7 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 32 . 6 7 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 24 . 1 8 ' 20 . 9 5 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 '50.00'60.00'60.00'60.00'60.00'55.24'60.00'60.00'60.00'60.00'55.24'C5C7C8 S36°37'43"W 125.00'S36°37'43"W 125.00'N65 ° 3 1 ' 3 0 " W 1 2 9 . 7 4 ' S78°23'3 1 " E 1 2 5 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' N65 ° 3 1 ' 3 0 " W 27.2 2 ' N84°44'18"W 125.0 0 'S5°15'42"W 305.98'N34°46'58"E 125.00'N 5 3 ° 2 2 ' 1 7 " W N 5 3 ° 2 2 ' 1 7 " W S5 2 ° 3 0 ' 0 0 " E 10' P U E 10' PUE PROPOSED SLOPE AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE TOV BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT PROPOSED SLOPE AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE TOV BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT PROPOSED 100-YEAR CLOMR FEMA FLOODPLAIN PROPOSED 100-YEAR CLOMR FEMA FLOODPLAIN (P U B L I C ) PORTIONS OF SECTIONS 25 & 36, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, AND SECTIONS 30 AND 31, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 14 EAST, GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA SEPTEMBER, 2018 1" = 40' Ref#: OV1801740 OV1701630 OV1701068 File:Q:\185050\PH-03 - RV Neigh 5WX\04 Platting\06 F-Plat\5WX-FP.dwg Plot Date:12/26/2018 10:33 AM By:kmarquez3 4 5 6 7 89 INDEX MAP 1" = 1000' 10 120'0'40'80'0'0'0' VP II LOAN LLC 71.22% ET AL 219-54-006F ZONING=PAD VP II LOAN LLC 71.22% ET AL 219-21-914C 1 2 .2 4.1 8SHEET 6 SHEET 8(PUBLIC)SHEET 9 (P U B L I C ) (P U B L I C )S24°28'30"WS24°28'30"WS5 3 ° 2 2 ' 1 7 " E 2 1 2 . 8 3 ' N 5 2 ° 3 0 ' 0 0 " W 1 7 0 . 0 0 ' N 5 2 ° 3 0 ' 0 0 " W 25'25' 10' PUE 10' PUE25'25'26 2 . 8 3 ' 13.52'FL25FL26 FL 2 7 FL 2 8 FL 2 9 FL30FL31 F L 6 2 FL63 FL 6 4 FL65FL66 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 8,156 sq.ft 0.19 acres 8,955 sq.ft 0.21 acres 8,955 sq.ft 0.21 acres 8,955 sq.ft 0.21 acres 8,955 sq.ft 0.21 acres 8,955 sq.ft 0.21 acres 7,604 sq.ft 0.17 acres 6,606 sq.ft 0.15 acres 6,079 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,395 sq.ft 0.15 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,430 sq.ft 0.15 acres 7,115 sq.ft 0.16 acres 6,813 sq.ft 0.16 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,769 sq.ft 0.16 acres 8,359 sq.ft 0.19 acres 6,357 sq.ft 0.15 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 7,115 sq.ft 0.16 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 7,756 sq.ft 0.18 acres 7,689 sq.ft 0.18 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 7,540 sq.ft 0.17 acres (P U B L I C ) (P U B L I C ) (P U B L I C ) 10 0 Y E A R F L O O D L I N E 260,356 sq.ft 5.98 acres 122,039 sq.ft 2.80 acres SEWER EASEMENT PER THIS PLAT SEE DETAIL SHEET 12S24°28'30"WS5 3 ° 2 2 ' 1 7 " E 2 1 2 . 8 3 '10' PUE10' PUE10' PUE10' PUE10' PUE10' PUETRAIL ESMT PER SEPARATE INSTRUMENT RFCD BANK PROTECTION MAINTENANCE & ACCESS ESMT PER SEPARATE INSTRUMENT TRAIL AND RFCD BANK PROTECTION MAINTENANCE AND ACCESS ESMT PER THIS PLAT (USED FOR ESMT TIE) RFCD BANK PROTECTION MAINTENANCE & ACCESS ESMT PER SEPARATE INSTRUMENT TRAIL AND RFCD BANK PROTECTION MAINTENANCE AND ACCESS ESMT PER THIS PLAT TRAIL AND ORO VALLEY WATER ACCESS ESMT PER SEPARATE INSTRUMENT RFCD BAN K P R O T E C T I O N MAINTENA N C E & A C C E S S E S M T PER SEPA R A T E I N S T R U M E N T TRAIL, ORO VALLEY WATER ACCESS AND RFCD BANK PROTECTION MAINTENANCE AND ACCESS ESMT PER THIS PLAT TRAIL E S M T S E E DETAIL S H E E T 1 2ZONE 'A 'ZONE 'X 'ZONE 'A'ZONE 'X'FEMA FLOOD LINEN10°00'00"E28.37'S36°37'43"W60.20'N10°00'00"E39.37'N80°00'00" W 8 0 . 6 3 ' C4 8 C4 9 C50 C51 C52 C53 C54C55C5621.97'29.38'C58C59C60C61C6 2 C 6 3 C 6 4 C 1 1 2 C11 3 C114 C1 1 5 13.52' C1 1 7 C11 9 C120 C121 C122C123C124C1 2 5 C 1 2 6 C 1 2 7 L 1 L 2 L3C131S80°00'00" E 9 2 . 3 3 ' C20 6 N 5 3 ° 2 2 ' 1 7 " W 60 . 0 0 ' N 4 7 ° 2 2 ' 3 9 " W 6 0 . 3 3 ' S5 2 ° 3 0 ' 0 0 " E 5 8 3 . 5 2 ' N 5 3 ° 2 2 ' 1 7 " W 5 4 0 . 0 0 'N10°00'00"E 120.00'L= 2 . 39 'L=41.22 ' C215 C21 3 C214 S 5 2 ° 3 0 ' 0 0 " E 5 8 3 . 5 2 ' 39.41'S3°13'19"W 68.02'S3°13'19"W 76.89'EL7 EL8 EL9EL10EC217 EC218 EC219EL11R=270.00'Δ=56°2S3 3 ° 5 2 ' 5 0 "E 2 0 1 . 0 3 'R=350.00'Δ=39°23'48"L=240.66'S5°01'57"E 226.34'S49°29'10"W 121.76' N80°00'00" W 4 0 4 . 1 8 ' N 5 2 ° 3 0 ' 0 0 " W 7 6 5 . 9 0 'R=275.00'Δ=63°22'17"L=304.16'C14S36°37'43"W 10.20'C12S5 3 ° 2 2 ' 1 7 " E 2 1 2 . 8 3 'R=325.00'Δ=61°59'20"L=351.62'S0°14'59"E 51.35'R=60 .0 0 'Δ =1 1 0 °38'19"L=115.86'N69° 3 6 ' 4 0 " W 5 0 . 0 0 ' N80°00'00" W 9 6 . 7 4 ' R =325.00'Δ=27°30'00"L=155.99' N 5 2 ° 3 0 ' 0 0 " W 6 0 0 . 6 5 ' S 5 2 ° 3 0 ' 0 0 " E 5 8 3 . 5 2 ' R =275.00'Δ=27°30'00"L=131.99' S80°00'00" E 1 3 1 . 7 4 'C43 N 5 3 ° 2 2 ' 1 7 " W 6 0 8 . 4 7 ' C13 N36°37'43"E10.20'S29°46'56"W 81.29'S5 2 ° 3 0 ' 0 0 " E 5 8 3 . 5 2 ' R =300.00'Δ=27°30'00"L=143.99' N 5 3 ° 2 2 ' 1 7 " W 6 0 8 . 4 7 ' N 5 3 ° 2 2 ' 1 7 " W 6 0 8 . 4 7 'R=300.00'Δ=63°22'17"L=331.81' S80°00'00" E 1 4 2 . 7 4 'S37°30'00"W 125.00'S37°30'00"W 120.00'N37°30'00"E 125.00'S37°30'00"W 120.00'S37°30'00"W 120.00'S37°30'00"W 120.00'S37°30'00"W 120.00'S37°30'00"W 120.00'S37°30'00"W 120.00'S37°30'00"W 120.00'S37°30'00"W 120.00'S31°03'46"W 120.00'N22°14'21"E 120.00'S13°24'57"W 120.00'S10°00'00"W 120.00'S10°00'00"W 130.00'S10°00'00"W 123.78'S10°00'00"W 124.96'N10°00'00"E 120.00'S65 ° 2 9 ' 5 7 " E 1 2 2 . 3 1 ' N78°53'04 " W 9 3 . 5 2 'S37°30'00"W 120.00'S37°30'00"W 120.00'S37°30'00"W 120.00'N37°30'00"E 120.00'N37°30'00"E 120.00'N37°30'00"E 120.00'N37°30'00"E 120.00'N37°30'00"E 120.00'N37°30'00"E 120.00'N37°30'00"E 120.00'N37°30'00"E 120.00'N37°30'00"E 120.00'N31°23'59"E 120.00'N12°50'10"E 120.00'N10°00'00"E 120.00'N10°00'00"E 120.00'S78°53'04 " E 1 2 5 . 7 6 ' S85°36'53"E 125.00' N83°47'33"E 125.0 0 ' N73°11'5 9 " E 1 2 5 . 0 0' N62°3 6' 2 5" E 1 2 5. 0 0' N52°00'51"E 125.00'N41°25'17"E 125.00'N36°37'43"E 125.00'S36°37'43"W 131.30'S36°37'43"W 125.00'S36°37'43"W 125.00'S36°37'43"W 125.00'S36°37'43"W 125.00'S36°37'43"W 125.00'S36°37'43"W 125.00'S36°37'43"W 125.00'N36°37'43"E 125.00'N36°37'43"E 125.00'S36°37'43"W 125.00'N36°37'43"E 125.00'N36°37'43"E 125.00'N36°37'43"E 125.00'60 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 33 . 5 2 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 42.33' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 30.63' 30.63' 50.00' 34.4 6 ' 15.54 ' 16.11' 50.00' 42.33' 33 . 5 2 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 1.47' 32 . 8 3 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 32 . 8 3 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 '50.00'C4C5S36°37'43"W 125.00'S37°30'00"W 120.00'S36°37'43"W 125.00'S37°30'00"W 120.00'R=445.00'Δ=27°30'00"L=213.58' S 5 2 ° 3 0 ' 0 0 " E 5 8 3 . 5 2 ' N 5 2 ° 3 0 ' 0 0 " W 6 0 0 . 6 5 ' N 5 2 ° 3 0 ' 0 0 " W 1 7 0 . 0 0 ' N 5 2 ° 3 0 ' 0 0 " W N 5 3 ° 2 2 ' 1 7 " W S 5 2 ° 3 0 ' 0 0 " E PROPOSED SLOPE AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOA, GRANTED BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT PROPOSED 100-YEAR CLOMR FEMA FLOODPLAIN PROPOSED 100-YEAR CLOMR FEMA FLOODPLAIN PORTIONS OF SECTIONS 25 & 36, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, AND SECTIONS 30 AND 31, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 14 EAST, GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA SEPTEMBER, 2018 1" = 40' Ref#: OV1801740 OV1701630 OV1701068 File:Q:\185050\PH-03 - RV Neigh 5WX\04 Platting\06 F-Plat\5WX-FP.dwg Plot Date:12/24/2018 12:29 PM By:kmarquez120'0'40'80'0'0'0' 3 4 5 6 7 89 INDEX MAP 1" = 1000' 10 1 2 .2 4.1 8SHEET 7 SHEET 9 AMPHI SCHOOL DISTRICT #10 219-54-006D ZONING=PAD V P I I L O A N L L C 71 . 2 2 % E T A L 21 9 - 5 4 - 0 0 6 C Z O N I N G = P A D 25'25'34 5 . 6 3 ' FL40FL41 FL42 FL43 FL 4 4 FL45FL46 FL47 FL48FL49FL50 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 6,250 sq.ft 0.14 acres 9,263 sq.ft 0.21 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 7,500 sq.ft 0.17 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres 6,000 sq.ft 0.14 acres (P U B L I C ) 260,356 sq.ft 5.98 acres 122,039 sq.ft2.80 acres10' PUE10' PUE10' PUE10' PUE31' 31' 17 . 1 3 'C111C666.99' S 5 2 ° 3 0 ' 0 0 " E 5 8 3 . 5 2 ' N 5 3 ° 2 2 ' 1 7 " W 5 4 0 . 0 0 ' N61°4 0' 5 3" E 51.00' S 5 2 ° 3 0 ' 0 0 " E 5 8 3 . 5 2 ' N 5 2 ° 3 0 ' 0 0 " W 7 6 5 . 9 0 ' R =440.00'L=52.02'Δ =6°46'24"N52°30'00"W 42.64'R=400.00'Δ=52°59'33"L=369.96'S51°49'27"E 7.43'R=562.00'Δ=32°16'29"L=316.57'R=593.00'Δ=36°00'00"L=372.59'S29°46'56"W 125.00'N 5 2 ° 3 0 ' 0 0 " W 6 0 0 . 6 5 ' C11 R=440.00'Δ=14°05'00"L=108.15'C4 1 S5 2 ° 3 0 ' 0 0 " E 5 8 3 . 5 2 'R=51.00'Δ=244 °1 3 '4 3 "L=217.3 9 'C40R=624.00'Δ=36°00'00"L=392.07'S29°46'56"W 81.29'C42S5 2 ° 3 0 ' 0 0 " E 5 8 3 . 5 2 'S36°37'43"W26.00'N 5 3 ° 2 2 ' 1 7 " W 6 0 8 . 4 7 'S37°30'00"W 125.00'S37°30'00"W 125.00'S37°30'00"W 125.00'S37°30'00"W 120.00'N37°30'00"E 125.00'S37°30'00"W 120.00'S37°30'00"W 120.00'S37°30'00"W 120.00'S37°30'00"W 120.00'S37°30'00"W 120.00'S37°30'00"W 120.00'S37°30'00"W 120.00'S37°30'00"W 120.00'S37°30'00"W 120.00'N37°30'00"E 120.00'N37°30'00"E 120.00'N37°30'00"E 120.00'N37°30'00"E 120.00'N37°30'00"E 120.00'S36°37'43"W 125.00'S36°37'43"W 125.00'N36°37'43"E 125.00'S36°37'43"W 125.00'S60°1 5' 0 9" W 8 4. 9 1'S36°37'43"W 125.00'50 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 50 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 60 . 0 0 ' 32 . 7 7 ' S5 9 ° 4 8 ' 2 1 " E 52. 2 7 'C1C2 C3 S36°37'43"W 125.00'S37°30'00"W 120.00'S36°37'43"W 125.00'S37°30'00"W 120.00'S5 2 ° 3 0 ' 0 0 " E 5 8 3 . 5 2 ' N 5 2 ° 3 0 ' 0 0 " W 6 0 0 . 6 5 ' N 5 2 ° 3 0 ' 0 0 " W 1 7 0 . 0 0 ' N 5 2 ° 3 0 ' 0 0 " W N 5 3 ° 2 2 ' 1 7 " W N 5 3 ° 2 2 ' 1 7 " W S5 2 ° 3 0 ' 0 0 " E PROPOSED SLOPE AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE TOV BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT PROPOSED SLOPE AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE TOV BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT PROPOSED SLOPE AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE TOV BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT 40' RIGHT-OF-WAY TO BE DEDICATEDBY SEPARATE INSTRUMENTN78°42'1 0 " W 200.00' R =4 0 0 .0 0 'Δ =4 2 °3 0 '2 7 "L =2 9 6 .7 6 'PROPOSED SLOPE AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOA, GRANTED BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT8' MULTI-USE TRAIL EASEMENT TO BEDEDICATED BY SEPARATEINSTRUMENTPORTIONS OF SECTIONS 25 & 36, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, AND SECTIONS 30 AND 31, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 14 EAST, GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA SEPTEMBER, 2018 1" = 40' Ref#: OV1801740 OV1701630 OV1701068 File:Q:\185050\PH-03 - RV Neigh 5WX\04 Platting\06 F-Plat\5WX-FP.dwg Plot Date:12/27/2018 3:42 PM By:kmarquez120'0'40'80'0'0'0' 3 4 5 6 7 89 INDEX MAP 1" = 1000' 10 AMPHI SCHOOL DISTRICT #10 219-54-006D ZONING=PAD VP II LOAN LLC 71.22% ET AL 219-21-914C ZONING=PAD V P I I L O A N L L C 71 . 2 2 % E T A L 21 9 - 5 4 - 0 0 6 C Z O N I N G = P A D 1 2 .2 7.1 8SHEET 8(PUBLIC)(PUBLIC) BK. 48, M&P, PG. 44 3 0 ' VISTOSO HILLS BK. 44, M&P, PG. 48 ZONING=PAD SHEET 7 PARCEL T RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 5 BK. 47 M&P PG. 68 ZONING=PADSHEET 10 PROPOSED SLOPE AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE TOV BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT PROPOSED SLOPE AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE TOV BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT S83°47'50"W 452.36' R =1 4 0 0 .0 0 'Δ =17 °3 0 '0 1"L =4 2 7 .6 1' N78°42'1 0 " W 200.00' PORTIONS OF SECTIONS 25 & 36, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, AND SECTIONS 30 AND 31, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 14 EAST, GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA SEPTEMBER, 2018 1" = 40' Ref#: OV1801740 OV1701630 OV1701068 File:Q:\185050\PH-03 - RV Neigh 5WX\04 Platting\06 F-Plat\5WX-FP.dwg Plot Date:12/24/2018 12:27 PM By:kmarquez120'0'40'80'0'0'0' 3 4 5 6 7 89 INDEX MAP 1" = 1000' 10 1 2 .2 4.1 8SHEET 9PARCEL T RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 5 BK. 47 M&P PG. 68 ZONING=PAD RANCHO VISTOSO OFFICE PARK ZONING=PAD VISTOSO HILLS BK. 44, M&P, PG. 48 ZONING=PAD 30'60'30'(PUBLIC) BK. 48, M&P, PG. 44(PUBLIC)BK. 8178 PG. 196740' INGRESS/EGRESS & PUBLIC UTILITYEASEMENT TO BE DEDICATED FOR PUBLICRIGHT-OF-WAY BY SEPARATEINSTRUMENT CURVE DATA CURVE C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 C11 C12 C13 C14 C15 C16 C17 C18 C19 C20 C21 C22 C23 C24 C25 C26 C27 C28 C29 C30 C31 C32 C33 C34 C35 C36 C37 C38 C39 C40 C41 C42 C43 C44 C45 C46 C47 C48 C49 C50 LENGTH 200.51' 2.91' 25.50' 61.26' 84.85' 84.85' 140.84' 115.93' 62.83' 10.08' 35.17' 39.27' 39.27' 90.15' 90.15' 45.96' 79.55' 39.27' 149.22' 132.46' 117.45' 41.06' 88.76' 45.96' 39.27' 39.27' 39.27' 39.27' 40.27' 118.77' 39.27' 41.60' 41.60' 48.06' 37.34' 37.34' 9.47' 38.13' 39.27' 45.96' 28.29' 34.36' 39.27' 40.53' 10.92' 9.24' 152.68' 36.51' 50.05' 50.05' RADIUS 405.01' 405.01' 200.00' 39.00' 400.00' 400.00' 420.00' 225.00' 39.00' 300.00' 22.00' 25.00' 25.00' 425.00' 425.00' 41.00' 375.00' 25.00' 445.00' 395.00' 250.00' 25.00' 200.00' 41.00' 25.00' 25.00' 25.00' 25.00' 25.00' 60.00' 25.00' 25.00' 25.00' 41.00' 25.00' 25.00' 624.00' 25.00' 25.00' 41.00' 225.00' 22.00' 25.00' 25.00' 325.00' 275.00' 51.00' 325.00' 325.00' 325.00' DELTA 28°21'56" 0°24'43" 7°18'21" 90°00'00" 12°09'13" 12°09'13" 19°12'48" 29°31'16" 92°18'08" 1°55'28" 91°35'01" 90°00'00" 90°00'00" 12°09'13" 12°09'13" 64°13'43" 12°09'13" 90°00'00" 19°12'48" 19°12'48" 26°55'03" 94°05'36" 25°25'40" 64°13'43" 90°00'00" 90°00'00" 90°00'00" 90°00'00" 92°18'08" 113°24'45" 90°00'00" 95°20'33" 95°20'33" 67°09'19" 85°34'53" 85°34'53" 0°52'11" 87°23'47" 90°00'00" 64°13'43" 7°12'12" 89°29'08" 90°00'00" 92°53'55" 1°55'28" 1°55'28" 171°31'50" 6°26'14" 8°49'24" 8°49'24" CHORD BEARING N45°05'13"E N30°41'54"E N56°09'11"W N55°00'00"E N30°33'06"E S59°26'54"E N14°52'06"E S69°58'40"E N46°37'52"E S88°33'28"E S81°42'29"W S8°22'17"E N81°37'43"E S30°33'06"W N59°26'54"W N85°29'09"W S59°26'54"E N69°28'30"E S14°52'06"W N14°52'06"E N68°40'34"W N52°18'30"E S67°55'52"E S23°06'11"E N87°29'39"E S2°30'21"E S47°46'56"W S42°13'04"E N46°37'52"E S46°47'51"W N44°31'12"W S44°43'59"W S39°55'27"E N55°58'04"W S4°42'55"E S89°42'12"W S47°20'51"W N38°26'12"W N20°31'30"W S21°15'26"E S56°06'06"E S14°57'38"E N55°00'00"E N44°01'50"E N88°33'28"W S88°33'28"E N66°34'47"E N55°43'07"W N63°20'56"W N72°10'21"W DISTANCE 198.47' 2.91' 25.48' 55.15' 84.69' 84.69' 140.18' 114.65' 56.25' 10.08' 31.54' 35.36' 35.36' 89.98' 89.98' 43.59' 79.40' 35.36' 148.53' 131.84' 116.37' 36.60' 88.03' 43.59' 35.36' 35.36' 35.36' 35.36' 36.06' 100.30' 35.36' 36.96' 36.96' 45.35' 33.97' 33.97' 9.47' 34.54' 35.36' 43.59' 28.27' 30.97' 35.36' 36.24' 10.92' 9.24' 101.72' 36.49' 50.00' 50.00' CURVE DATA CURVE C51 C52 C53 C54 C55 C56 C57 C58 C59 C60 C61 C62 C63 C64 C65 C66 C67 C68 C69 C70 C71 C72 C73 C74 C75 C76 C77 C78 C79 C80 C81 C82 C83 C84 C85 C86 C87 C88 C89 C90 C91 C92 C93 C94 C95 C96 C99 C100 C102 C103 LENGTH 19.38' 35.45' 30.32' 18.54' 28.18' 3.37' 114.50' 24.01' 60.09' 60.09' 60.09' 60.09' 60.09' 27.19' 19.89' 182.52' 49.29' 210.24' 4.76' 60.10' 60.10' 60.10' 91.22' 28.98' 10.29' 11.57' 20.03' 36.63' 15.12' 27.94' 39.55' 39.55' 38.41' 41.63' 14.71' 16.89' 16.37' 32.54' 60.14' 1.03' 56.28' 3.89' 5.03' 33.53' 46.01' 30.91' 37.60' 34.38' 29.22' 22.23' RADIUS 325.00' 60.00' 60.00' 60.00' 60.00' 60.00' 51.00' 325.00' 325.00' 325.00' 325.00' 325.00' 325.00' 325.00' 445.00' 51.00' 445.00' 250.00' 300.00' 300.00' 300.00' 300.00' 300.00' 25.00' 25.00' 41.00' 41.00' 51.00' 51.00' 51.00' 51.00' 51.00' 51.00' 51.00' 41.00' 41.00' 200.00' 55.80' 250.00' 250.00' 250.00' 25.00' 25.00' 375.00' 375.00' 51.00' 51.00' 51.00' 545.00' 545.00' DELTA 3°24'57" 33°51'18" 28°57'18" 17°42'13" 26°54'30" 3°12'59" 128°38'13" 4°13'57" 10°35'34" 10°35'34" 10°35'34" 10°35'34" 10°35'34" 4°47'34" 2°33'38" 205°03'10" 6°20'47" 48°11'04" 0°54'36" 11°28'42" 11°28'42" 11°28'42" 17°25'21" 66°25'19" 23°34'41" 16°10'03" 27°59'34" 41°09'05" 16°59'29" 31°23'21" 44°25'58" 44°25'58" 43°09'10" 46°46'15" 20°33'26" 23°36'11" 4°41'25" 33°24'55" 13°47'03" 0°14'08" 12°53'52" 8°54'39" 11°32'13" 5°07'23" 7°01'50" 34°43'36" 42°14'32" 38°37'22" 3°04'20" 2°20'13" CHORD BEARING N78°17'32"W N86°32'19"W S62°03'23"W S38°43'37"W N16°25'15"E S1°21'30"W N14°39'31"W S6°30'05"W S0°54'40"E S11°30'14"E S22°05'48"E S32°41'22"E S43°16'56"E S50°58'30"E S23°11'41"W N49°09'18"E S8°26'05"W N18°49'50"W S4°48'24"W S1°23'15"E S12°51'57"E N24°20'39"W S38°47'41"E S14°17'42"E S30°42'18"W S50°34'40"W S72°39'29"W S66°04'44"W S37°00'27"W S12°49'02"W S25°05'37"E S69°31'35"E N66°40'51"E N21°43'08"E N8°36'44"E N30°41'33"E S78°18'00"E S9°19'19"E N62°20'42"W N55°20'06"W N75°41'10"W N77°40'46"W S71°17'37"E S62°57'49"E S56°53'12"E S70°44'05"E S70°46'51"W S81°42'41"W S63°59'20"E S54°32'24"E DISTANCE 19.37' 34.94' 30.00' 18.47' 27.92' 3.37' 91.92' 24.00' 60.00' 60.00' 60.00' 60.00' 60.00' 27.18' 19.88' 99.57' 49.27' 204.10' 4.76' 60.00' 60.00' 60.00' 90.87' 27.39' 10.22' 11.53' 19.83' 35.85' 15.07' 27.59' 38.57' 38.57' 37.51' 40.49' 14.63' 16.77' 16.37' 32.08' 60.00' 1.03' 56.16' 3.88' 5.03' 33.52' 45.99' 30.44' 36.75' 33.73' 29.22' 22.23' CURVE DATA CURVE C104 C106 C107 C108 C109 C110 C111 C112 C113 C114 C115 C116 C117 C119 C120 C121 C122 C123 C124 C125 C126 C127 C128 C129 C130 C131 C132 C133 C134 C135 C139 C141 C143 C144 C145 C155 C168 C179 C183 C185 C186 C192 C193 C194 C196 C197 C198 C199 C200 C201 LENGTH 64.15' 17.33' 50.03' 22.79' 32.07' 5.03' 34.87' 58.98' 89.10' 13.61' 29.28' 34.24' 50.00' 68.53' 68.53' 26.53' 83.20' 83.20' 83.20' 83.20' 83.20' 37.64' 76.91' 63.14' 79.55' 245.18' 85.14' 6.75' 85.14' 85.14' 34.25' 12.78' 49.23' 11.18' 11.18' 18.77' 45.28' 50.02' 50.02' 50.02' 46.13' 38.40' 32.32' 146.18' 22.55' 17.99' 27.08' 12.19' 55.63' 61.45' RADIUS 545.00' 425.00' 425.00' 425.00' 51.00' 25.00' 51.00' 275.00' 275.00' 275.00' 275.00' 25.00' 445.00' 445.00' 445.00' 445.00' 450.00' 450.00' 450.00' 450.00' 450.00' 450.00' 570.00' 570.00' 375.00' 275.00' 425.00' 425.00' 425.00' 425.00' 25.00' 60.00' 60.00' 60.00' 60.00' 60.00' 525.00' 525.00' 525.00' 525.00' 525.00' 51.00' 51.00' 51.00' 25.00' 25.00' 25.00' 25.00' 645.00' 645.00' DELTA 6°44'40" 2°20'13" 6°44'40" 3°04'20" 36°01'55" 11°32'13" 39°10'33" 12°17'15" 18°33'49" 2°50'11" 6°06'01" 78°27'47" 6°26'14" 8°49'24" 8°49'24" 3°24'57" 10°35'34" 10°35'34" 10°35'34" 10°35'34" 10°35'34" 4°47'34" 7°43'52" 6°20'47" 12°09'13" 51°05'02" 11°28'42" 0°54'36" 11°28'42" 11°28'42" 78°29'08" 12°12'21" 47°00'52" 10°40'35" 10°40'35" 17°55'21" 4°56'28" 5°27'32" 5°27'32" 5°27'32" 5°02'05" 43°08'17" 36°18'18" 164°13'48" 51°40'16" 41°13'39" 62°03'09" 27°56'51" 4°56'28" 5°27'32" CHORD BEARING S59°04'50"E N54°32'24"W N59°04'50"W N63°59'20"W N37°12'05"W N59°45'24"W S8°43'51"E N47°13'40"W S67°52'55"E S78°34'55"E S55°33'01"E N14°45'24"W S55°43'07"E S63°20'56"E S72°10'21"E S78°17'32"E N0°54'40"W N11°30'14"W N22°05'48"W N32°41'22"W N43°16'56"W N50°58'30"W N15°28'25"E N8°26'05"E N30°33'06"E N15°32'31"W N1°23'15"W N4°48'24"E N12°51'57"W S24°20'39"E N33°58'52"W N82°35'58"W S67°44'38"W S38°53'49"W S28°13'14"W N0°56'52"W S1°59'26"E S7°11'27"E S12°38'58"E S18°06'30"E S23°21'18"E S47°26'29"E S87°09'47"E N7°25'50"W N23°25'01"E N69°51'58"E N58°29'38"W N13°29'38"W N1°59'26"W N7°11'27"W DISTANCE 64.12' 17.33' 50.00' 22.79' 31.55' 5.03' 34.20' 58.86' 88.71' 13.61' 29.26' 31.62' 49.97' 68.46' 68.46' 26.53' 83.08' 83.08' 83.08' 83.08' 83.08' 37.63' 76.85' 63.10' 79.40' 237.14' 85.00' 6.75' 85.00' 85.00' 31.63' 12.76' 47.86' 11.16' 11.16' 18.69' 45.26' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 46.12' 37.50' 31.78' 101.04' 21.79' 17.60' 25.77' 12.07' 55.61' 61.43' CURVE DATA CURVE C202 C203 C204 C205 C206 C207 C208 C209 C210 C211 C213 C214 C215 C231 C232 C234 C310 LENGTH 61.45' 61.45' 56.68' 5.03' 74.39' 115.60' 54.09' 20.00' 34.24' 296.66' 50.22' 16.50' 7.67' 22.80' 31.29' 15.57' 65.28' RADIUS 645.00' 645.00' 645.00' 25.00' 155.00' 545.00' 255.00' 250.00' 25.00' 645.00' 155.00' 155.00' 155.00' 255.00' 255.00' 60.00' 624.00' DELTA 5°27'32" 5°27'32" 5°02'05" 11°32'13" 27°30'00" 12°09'13" 12°09'13" 4°34'59" 78°27'47" 26°21'08" 18°33'49" 6°06'01" 2°50'11" 5°07'23" 7°01'50" 14°52'07" 5°59'38" CHORD BEARING N12°38'58"W N18°06'30"W N23°21'18"W N48°15'45"E S66°15'00"E N59°26'54"W S59°26'54"E N45°12'52"W N63°42'23"E S12°41'46"E N67°52'55"W N55°33'01"W N78°34'55"W N62°57'49"W N56°53'12"W N15°26'52"E S5°46'45"W DISTANCE 61.43' 61.43' 56.66' 5.03' 73.68' 115.39' 53.99' 19.99' 31.62' 294.05' 50.00' 16.49' 7.67' 22.79' 31.27' 15.53' 65.25' Parcel Line Table Line # L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 Length 35.24' 23.39' 30.50' 49.22' 26.14' 18.89' Direction N38°22'43"W S38°22'43"E N88°02'54"W N0°00'00"E S36°35'29"E S20°59'22"W Line # FL1 FL2 FL3 FL4 FL5 FL6 FL7 FL8 FL9 FL10 FL11 FL12 FL13 FL14 FL15 FL16 FL17 FL18 FL19 FL20 FL21 FL22 FL23 FL24 FL25 FL26 FL27 FL28 FL29 FL30 FL31 FL32 FL33 FL34 FL35 FL36 FL37 FL38 FL39 FL40 Length 33.46' 23.87' 39.44' 62.92' 27.97' 355.84' 12.75' 33.55' 11.55' 15.94' 16.35' 23.44' 21.29' 17.85' 37.92' 83.57' 78.01' 115.55' 58.03' 42.99' 13.73' 8.24' 45.91' 17.20' 10.95' 11.01' 88.43' 80.72' 38.22' 11.85' 10.04' 5.44' 11.68' 67.21' 10.99' 30.43' 8.82' 107.56' 70.59' 27.13' Direction N90°00'00"W S0°00'00"E S63°06'54"E S49°42'04"E S57°27'12"E S32°15'11"E S67°03'02"E S38°59'59"E S51°30'13"W S70°39'29"E S23°16'00"E S42°52'36"E S54°41'21"E N58°40'54"W N33°20'45"W N35°33'42"W N44°33'50"W N38°07'23"W N21°26'48"W N43°55'40"W S36°08'47"W N80°54'19"W N29°29'46"W N13°06'03"W S18°05'35"W N70°51'34"W N53°57'43"W N60°48'46"W N55°19'27"W S61°47'19"W N13°17'09"W N45°01'16"E N17°54'22"W N50°16'40"W S62°04'53"W N57°54'23"W N26°58'57"W N55°08'43"W N47°48'58"W N70°29'10"W FLOOD LINE TABLE Line # FL41 FL42 FL43 FL44 FL45 FL46 FL47 FL48 FL49 FL50 FL51 FL52 FL53 FL54 FL55 FL56 FL57 FL58 FL59 FL60 FL61 FL62 FL63 FL64 FL65 FL66 Length 8.63' 60.63' 17.96' 22.83' 18.55' 20.96' 17.89' 14.92' 23.53' 7.38' 182.88' 15.13' 33.35' 123.19' 261.95' 17.19' 7.65' 18.72' 66.92' 22.66' 100.86' 16.49' 12.49' 17.26' 10.33' 30.62' Direction S77°40'45"W S60°44'40"W N71°44'50"W N61°14'50"W N80°34'55"W S82°26'48"W S61°51'40"W S41°19'27"W S18°40'48"W N70°38'54"W N5°34'06"E N70°12'48"E S64°12'55"E S56°06'45"E S53°14'19"E N79°40'48"E S17°44'07"E S16°34'07"W S49°55'25"E S80°19'08"E S60°04'19"E S45°14'51"E S78°13'19"E S55°27'38"E S4°32'42"W S74°45'19"E FLOOD LINE TABLE Parcel Line Table Line # EL7 EL8 EL9 EL10 EL11 EL12 EL13 EL14 EL15 EL16 EL17 Length 6.00' 236.36' 162.10' 230.33' 26.23' 238.05' 147.46' 49.51' 359.72' 214.80' 241.69' Direction S10°00'00"W N80°00'00"W N3°13'19"E S3°13'19"W S12°03'55"E S24°26'29"W S0°28'48"W S8°58'50"E S0°28'48"W S0°51'14"E S25°52'21"E CURVE DATA CURVE EC217 EC218 EC219 EC220 EC221 LENGTH 247.81' 107.70' 55.56' 31.10' 298.45' RADIUS 454.00' 454.00' 454.00' 268.60' 649.00' DELTA 31°16'29" 13°35'32" 7°00'41" 6°38'03" 26°20'54" CHORD BEARING S11°15'26"E S33°41'26"E S43°59'33"E S4°35'25"W S12°41'54"E DISTANCE 244.75' 107.45' 55.52' 31.08' 295.83' PORTIONS OF SECTIONS 25 & 36, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, AND SECTIONS 30 AND 31, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 14 EAST, GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA SEPTEMBER, 2018 1" = 40' Ref#: OV1801740 OV1701630 OV1701068 File:Q:\185050\PH-03 - RV Neigh 5WX\04 Platting\06 F-Plat\5WX-FP.dwg Plot Date:12/24/2018 12:26 PM By:kmarquez1 2 .2 4.1 8 S5°15'42"W 305.98'(PUBL IC ) (PUBLIC) PORTIONS OF SECTIONS 25 & 36, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 13 EAST, AND SECTIONS 30 AND 31, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 14 EAST, GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA SEPTEMBER, 2018 1" = 40' Ref#: OV1801740 OV1701630 OV1701068 File:Q:\185050\PH-03 - RV Neigh 5WX\04 Platting\06 F-Plat\5WX-FP.dwg Plot Date:12/24/2018 12:23 PM By:kmarquezSEE SHEET 5 PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENT DETAIL 1N GEYSER VALLEYPL (PUBL IC )MOORE LOOP ROAD (PUBLIC)PU B L IC S EW ER E A S EM EN T P ER TH I S P L A T E KALALAU ST (PUBLIC) 1" = 20' SIGHT VISIBILITY DETAIL 15W-2 STREET (PUBLIC)SIGHT VISIBILITY DETAIL 2N LAUTERBRUNNEN LN(PUBLIC)SIGHT VISIBILITY DETAIL 3 SIGHT VISIBILITY DETAIL 4 1" = 60' E DANUM VALLEY DR (PUBLIC) SIGHT VISIBILITY DETAIL 5 1" = 60' SCALE: AS NOTED COMMON AREA "A" COMMON AREA "A" COMMON AREA "A" COMMON AREA "A" COMMON AREA "A" PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENT PER THIS PLAT MOORE LOOP ROAD (PUBLIC)COMMON AREA "A" COMMON AREA "A" N73°34'25"W 32.36' (SVT TIE) N84°42'51"E 65.23' (SVT TIE) E B A R U N V A L L E Y D R (P U B L I C )N LAUTERBRUNNEN LN (PUBLIC)E N U B R A V A L L E Y C T (PU B L I C )N HAA VALLEY CT(PUBLIC)E D A N UM V A L L E Y D R ( P U B L I C )N GEYSER VALLEY ST(PUBLIC)E DANUM VALLEY DR (PUBLIC) COMMON AREA "A" COMMON AREA "A" COMMON AREA "A" N12°16'38"W 203.62' N47°55'55"E 1.15' (SVT TIE) S24°46'53"E 2.34' (SVT TIE) N4°02'03"W 24.34' S81°58'30"W 23.43' (SVT TIE) N52°01'12"W 24.34'N5°27'32"E173.71'N47°29'27"W 21.71' (SVT TIE) N2°24'33"E 54.83' N81°24'09"E 40.30' (SVT TIE)N23°53'01"E167.82'N80°36'42"E 18.99' (SVT TIE) N26°02'39"W 23.43' (SVT TIE) N19°57'39"E 24.34'N15°46'51"E231.34'N9°33'46"W 244.81' 1 2 .2 4.1 8S80°00'00" E 8 7 . 0 7 'N10°00'00"E 120.00'S 3 8 ° 2 2 ' 4 3 " E 2 3 . 3 9 ' L=3.41' S 3 9 ° 2 1 ' 0 1 " E 6 6 . 8 7 ' S 3 9 ° 2 1 ' 0 1 " E 5 5 . 9 5 ' L=20.37' 1" = 60'1" = 60' 1" = 60' 1" = 60'S0°27'16"W51.00'R=51.00'Δ=137°31'01"L=122.41'S29°46'56"W 128.69'S29°46'56"W 128.69'5.96'R=624.00' L=15.52' Δ=1°25'29"S49°29'10"W 121.76'28.58'143.83'S5°01'57"E 226.34'S78°53'04 " E 1 2 9 . 8 0 ' S78°53'04 " E 1 2 8 . 5 5 'S3°13'19"W 141.61'N3°13'19"E 162.10'RFCD BANK PROTECTIONMAINTENANCE & ACCESSESMT PER THIS PLAT12' TRAIL ESMT PER THIS PLAT20' TRAIL E S M T P E R T H I S P L A T PUBLIC SEWER/ORO VALLEY WATER ACCESS EASEMENT EASEMENT DETAIL 2 1" = 20' PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENT PER THIS PLAT N65 ° 2 9 ' 5 7 " W 139. 0 9 '27' ORO VALLEYWATER ACCESSEASEMENTPER THIS PLATN65 ° 2 9 ' 5 7 " W 120. 7 4 ' S65 ° 2 9 ' 5 7 " E 122. 3 1 ' N 3 8 ° 2 2 ' 4 3 "W 4 7 . 2 1 ' N 3 8 ° 5 6 ' 5 0 "W 2 4 . 4 0 ' 12'S3°13'19"W46.16'S3°13'19"W33.33'N49°29'10"E61.64'S80°00'00" E 87.07' N49°29'10"E 16.61'N3°13'19"E66.33'PUBLIC TRAIL AND RFCD BANK PROTECTION MAINTENANCE AND ACCESS EASEMENT DETAIL 1" = 20'    Town Council Regular Session 1. Meeting Date:01/09/2019   Requested by: Bayer Vella, Community and Economic Development  Submitted By:Hannah Oden, Community and Economic Development Case Number: OV1801670 Information SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE NO. (O)19-01, DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING A REZONING REQUEST FROM CAMPUS PARK INDUSTRIAL TO MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL FOR AN APPROXIMATE 15-ACRE PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF RANCHO VISTOSO BLVD AND VISTOSO COMMERCE LOOP RECOMMENDATION: By a vote of 4 to 3, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this request. Staff's professional opinion, however, is respectfully a recommendation of denial. Meeting minutes and the Commission staff report are included in Attachments 5 and 6. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The purpose of this request is to consider a rezoning application to change from Campus Park Industrial (CPI) to Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) within the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development (PAD) (Attachment 2).  The proposed development site is approximately 15 acres and located at the northwest corner of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and Vistoso Commerce Loop. The approval of this request would ultimately allow a residential subdivision with a similar density and design to adjacent neighborhoods. The applicant's revised proposal (Attachment 4) depicts one Tentative Development Plan (TDP) (Attachment 3), which includes 72 detached single-family homes. The proposed minimum lot size is 4,400 square feet. As a whole, the proposed density of 4.7 dwelling units per acre is consistent with the adjacent Medium Density Residential zoned neighborhoods, which have densities of 5.4 and 2.9 dwelling units per acre. Town Council approved a Type 1 General Plan Amendment for this parcel at their regularly scheduled meeting on September 19, 2018. The land use designation was changed from Commerce/Office Park to Medium Density Residential (MDR). Prior to this action, the Planning and Zoning Commission and Community & Economic Development Department staff recommended denial of the General Plan Amendment request based on General Plan policy direction. One neighborhood meeting was held on October 15, 2018 for the rezoning, which was the third meeting for the site. Issues of concern raised by neighbors included the following:  Concern over the preservation of existing views 1. Building height2. Buffer yards between the proposed project and neighbors to the north3. Density and compatibility of surrounding homes4. Traffic and circulation5. Uses that would be permitted under existing CPI zoning and if design standards would be compatible with surrounding land uses 6. Neighbor ability to have input for a Campus Park Industrial development proposal7. Concern regarding the loss of employment land8. This report addresses concerns raised at the most recent neighborhood meeting.  This rezoning request was considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission at a special session on November 8, 2018. At this public hearing, the Commission voted 4-3 to recommend approval of this application, while staff recommended denial. Draft minutes and the associated staff report are provided in Attachments 5 and 6.  All rezoning requests are reviewed for conformance with the General Plan land use designation, goals and policies. While the proposal for residential zoning is in conformance with the newly designated land use and is compatible with adjacent residential properties, staff's concerns raised during the General Plan Amendment process have remain unchanged. On balance, it is staff's professional opinion that this proposal is not in conformance with the policies of the Your Voice, Our Future General Plan. The proposal, if approved, will significantly reduce an already limited supply of CPI land in Oro Valley, which is needed to attract employers. Increasing employment opportunities and supporting the local economy is a major emphasis of the General Plan. Furthermore, enabling more residential units closer to existing and future CPI and commercial development creates land use compatibility concerns. BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: A. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND CONTEXT Zoning Context The existing zoning for the property and the surrounding areas are provided in Attachment 2. The subject property is currently designated as Campus Park Industrial. Nearby zoning designations include Campus Park Industrial, Medium Density Residential, and Community Commercial.  Site Conditions  15.23 acres Property is vacant Property History   June 1987: Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development, Office / Research Park (CPI) Zoning March 2008: Development plan / preliminary plat for "Innovation Commerce Campus" approved by the Town Council April 2009: Final plat for "Innovation Commerce Campus" approved by the Town Council December 2009: One year extension for the development plan / preliminary plat March 2010: Development plan / preliminary plat approvals for "Innovation Commerce Campus" expired. Town Council voted to decline a requested time extension. December 2011: General Plan amendment request for High Density Residential denied by the Town Council September 2018: General Plan amendment request for Medium Density Residential approved by Town Council  November 2018: Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of a rezoning request from Campus Park Industrial to Medium High Density Residential   Existing Zoning The property is currently zoned as Planned Area Development (PAD), Campus Park Industrial (CPI), described below: Rancho Vistoso PAD Campus Park Industrial (CPI): The office park at Rancho Vistoso is intended to be a well-designed industrial and office development set respectively into the desert. It will provide a truly mixed use community by providing jobs for residents of Rancho Vistoso. The office park will include a variety of office and research and development uses along with ancillary uses to serve the population of the office park. These ancillary uses may include a restaurant, a bank, a child care facility, a health club/recreation facility and others, as long as they are not more obnoxious than the permitted uses. B. APPLICANT'S REQUEST Proposed Zoning The applicant's request is to change the current zoning designation to Planned Area Development (PAD), Medium High Density Residential (MHDR), depicted below:  Rancho Vistoso PAD Medium High Density Residential (6-8 homes per acre): Medium high density is located in areas with minimal natural constraints. It is intended to provide individual single family ownership through patio homes and townhouses. The applicant is proposing a lower density than what is allowed per MHDR zoning (6-8 homes per acre) because the potential builder (KB Homes) wishes to use the smaller lot sizes enabled in MHDR versus MDR. MHDR allows uses of a minimum lot size of 4,000 square feet. In comparison, the minimum lot sizes in the adjacent subdivisions are 5,000 square feet with an MDR designation. The applicant is proposing an average lot size of 4,868 square feet. Adjacent subdivisions have average lot sizes of 6,500 square feet and 6,700 square feet.  As a Condition of Approval included in Attachment 11, the density of this proposed development and all potential future development on this parcel may not exceed five (5) homes per acre, the allowed density under the MDR General Plan land use designation.  C. GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE ANALYSIS Rezoning applications are reviewed for conformance with the Your Voice, Our Future General Plan Land Use Map, Vision, Guiding Principles, Goals and Policies. Although the proposal complies with the General Plan land use designation, staff finds that the proposed rezoning does not conform, on balance, to the General Plan Vision, Guiding Principles, Goals and Polices due to the following:  Loss of high quality employment area when the amount of CPI land in Oro Valley is already very limited Enabling more residential units closer to existing and future CPI and commercial development creates land use compatibility concerns Below is a more detailed General Plan analysis: Land Use Map With a condition that no residential development may exceed five (5) homes per acre, the proposed rezoning conforms with the Medium High Density General Plan land use designation.  The General Plan Vision "Oro Valley strives to be a well-managed community that provides all residents with opportunities for quality living. Oro Valley will keep its friendly, small-town, neighborly character, while increasing services, employment and recreation. The Town's lifestyle continues to be defined by a strong sense of community, a high regard for public safety and an extraordinary natural environment and scenic views" Staff finds that the proposed rezoning does not conform with the Your Voice Vision because it decreases potential employment opportunities. This issue is compounded by Oro Valley's relatively low supply of CPI/Tech Park zoned lands. Guiding Principles, Goals, and Policies a) Employment opportunities and economic growth: The Your Voice, Our Future  General Plan places a significant emphasis on increasing and not just maintaining employment land. As stated in previous General Plan Amendment staff reports (Attachment 10), the proposed rezoning does not support General Plan goals and policies of growing high quality employment opportunities and supporting a strong and diverse economy. Specific goals and policies include:   Goal A: Long-term financial and economic stability and sustainability. Goal B: A robust local economy and job market that provide opportunities for quality employment,build on Oro Valley’s assets and encourage high-quality growth. Goal C: A strong sector of targeted industries, including bioscience and aerospace, that provide opportunities for synergy and growth. Policy E.1: Develop a diversified and robust economic base to support long-term economic stability. Policy E.3. Promote Oro Valley as an ideal destination for economic activity, tourism, shopping, cultural attractions, research and development. Oro Valley has significantly lower CPI acreage (2% of total area/400 acres) relative to other communities, and the proposed rezoning would further diminish the approximate 200 remaining buildable acres of CPI/Tech Park land available to attract high quality employers to the community. Retaining the current use on this property would benefit the long-term economic viability of the community more than a single family home residential development. Unless a residential subdivision is of substantial size, it will not significantly contribute to the overall viability of existing commercial and employment uses. Economic considerations:  A mid-size tech oriented employer will create long-term job opportunities with an above average wage, which has a multiplier effect into all sectors of the community.  Currently, a conservative estimate of 3,647 residential units (including apartments) are currently entitled for development. The proposed 72-home subdivision is a mere 2% of this total, which will have no meaningful economic impact when taken in the context of the larger number of residential units anticipated.  Office workers and residents exercise similar spending on retail services and goods. According to the International Council of Shopping Centers, $102 to $195 per office worker is spent each week. This is comparable to an estimated $134 per resident weekly retail spend. The amount of weekly retail revenue generated by residents of a 72-home subdivision will be comparable to an employer the size of Securaplane.  410 new homes in areas near Innovation Park will be provided in the next two (2) to seven (7) years. Approximately 13,000 OV residents already commute out of town to work, which is a quality of life (complete community), traffic and loss of revenue issue.  While the request is consistent with the General Plan land use designation, staff wants to reiterate previous concerns related to the loss of CPI related employment area and finds that the proposed zoning does not support the aforementioned goals and policies of the General Plan.  b) Transition between land uses and compatibility: Goal X of the General Plan emphasizes an effective transition between differing land uses and intensities in the community. The subject property is located adjacent to Campus Park Industrial, Medium Density Residential, and Neighborhood Commercial zoning as shown in Attachment 2. The parcel is located on a street corner with abutting properties being single-family residential to the north, and warehouse and distribution center and dermatology office to the northeast. To the south and east, there are Commerce / Office Park and Neighborhood Commercial / Office properties separated by Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and Vistoso Commerce Loop. The proposed development is compatible with the abutting residential subdivisions. The applicant is proposing buffer yards along roadways and between adjacent residences and businesses to the extent required by the zoning code. It should be noted that the subdivision to the north has a density of 5.4 homes per acre, and the subdivision to the northwest across Vistoso Village Dr. has a density of 2.9 homes per acre. 4.7 homes per acre is proposed. A new residential development on this site, however, will position more homes closer to existing and future commercial and Commerce / Office Park development. The proposed subdivision will place residents directly across from Vistoso Funeral Home and future CPI development across Rancho Vistoso Blvd. Currently, 20 homes would be adjacent to CPI use on the parcel. If the parcel is zoned for residential purposes, this would cause up to 30 homes to be potentially impacted by surrounding non-residential land uses. More residences will increase pressure on existing and future businesses. Residential use on this parcel could place more homes next to dissimilar land uses, which in this sense, would not be an appropriate transition or buffer between land uses.  dissimilar land uses, which in this sense, would not be an appropriate transition or buffer between land uses.  The applicant is proposing a 15-foot landscaped buffer yard along the northern edge of the parcel. Retaining CPI uses on the parcel would require a 15-30 foot landscaped buffer yard with a likely 28 foot access drive and an additional 2-17 foot drive depending on site design. A CPI use would likely include a minimum 60-foot separation between residences and buildings. This anticipated separation is greater than afforded by MHDR residential development. The Design Standards found in Addendum A of the Zoning Code state, "manufacturing uses shall be placed in a location furthest from residentially-zoned property. When possible, office uses shall be placed adjacent to residentially-zoned property" (Section 2.1.A.5). This standard minimizes impacts to adjacent homes and would be applicable if this parcel developed under CPI standards. Based on the Town's experience, this will likely result in smaller buildings with lower building heights adjacent to existing residential areas.   Concern over the impact of loading zones to adjacent residences have been voiced by neighbors during the public participation process. CPI zoning would allow for uses that may require loading zones. The Town Zoning Code outlines specific restrictions for loading zones to limit impacts to adjacent land uses. Loading zones must be placed a minimum of 30 feet from residential areas and must be fully screened with an opaque wall and landscaping to minimize impacts. Some uses allowed under CPI zoning on this parcel will not require loading zones, such as office oriented development. So, it is possible that a future employment use on this parcel would not have a need for a loading zone(s). However, if needed, loading zones must comply with the specific standards within the Zoning Code that ensure appropriate transitions and buffers.  Moreover, the Design Standards of the Zoning Code (Addendum A) specifically states, "where applicable and feasible, buildings shall be oriented to internalize service and loading areas between buildings to reduce visibility of these areas" (Section 2.4.6). As such, any development allowed under CPI zoning would be subject to these standards to limit impacts to adjacent residences. Section 2.1.J.1.b of the Design Standards also states that "refuse enclosures and service areas shall be located away from residential areas in a manner to reduce visibility of these areas from adjoining streets and property", while Section 2.2.F states, "mechanical equipment shall be screened from public view and ground mounted equipment is encouraged." These Design Standards ensure uses allowed under CPI zoning are sensitive to surrounding land uses.  D. ZONING CODE CONFORMANCE ANALYSIS Site Design: The request and tentative development plans were found to be in conformance with the requirements specified in the Town Zoning Code and Rancho Vistoso PAD.  Drainage: There are two minor drainage ways that exist on the site with a southern flow direction. The subject parcel lies outside of any 100-year floodplains with onsite discharges equal to or greater than 50 cfs. The subdivision must be designed so post-developed drainage conditions are consistent with pre-developed conditions in accordance with Town drainage requirements. General Traffic: The proposed subdivision will have two ingress/egress points at Vistoso Commerce Loop. A traffic impact analysis was provided with the revised Site Analysis to evaluate the effect of additional traffic on surrounding roadways. Internal streets and access drives within the development will be constructed to Town Code standards. Off-site improvements will include re-striping Vistoso Commerce Loop as described in Attachment 11. Public roadway improvements to be completed by the developer shall be at their expense and will require approval and a permit issued from the Town Engineer’s office. E. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION The following notice has been provided:  Notification to all property owners within 600 feet Notification to all interested parties who signed in at neighborhood meetings Homeowners association mailing Advertisement in The Daily Territorial  Posting on property Posting at Town Hall and on Town Website One neighborhood meeting for the rezoning was held on October 15, 2018, with approximately 13 residents in attendance. The main topics discussed at this meeting included:  Concerns over the preservation of existing views   The applicant explained that homes would be limited to single story homes at 18 feet to mitigate view impacts. Building height  The applicant explained that homes would be limited to one story and 18 feet. This is a condition of approval in Attachment 11. Buffer yards between the proposed project and neighbors to the north  The applicant explained that they are proposing a 15 foot landscape buffer yard between the proposed homes and the existing subdivision to the north and abutting CPI uses.  As previously stated in this report, a CPI use would provide a greater required buffer yard and setback between adjacent property lines and a building. Density and compatibility with surrounding homes  The applicant explained that the proposed density would be similar to adjacent neighborhoods. As previously stated in this report, surrounding residential densities are 2.9 and 5.4 homes per acre. The proposed density would be compatible with surrounding neighborhoods at up to 4.8 homes per acre.  Traffic and circulation  Engineering staff addressed traffic concerns and circulation, which did not warrant substantial changes to the TDP. Uses that would be permitted under existing CPI zoning and if design standards would be compatible with surrounding land uses  The applicant explained potential uses under the CPI zoning as well as required buffer yards and height associated with a CPI development.  As stated previously, CPI development standards would require greater setbacks and buffer yards compared to residential uses. Loading zones, if needed, are required to be fully screened. While the allowed height would be up to 36 feet, specific design standards would help mitigate potential impacts. Neighbor ability to have input for a Campus Park Industrial development proposal  Currently, the site is located within the Economic Expansion Zone (EEZ), which is meant to streamline the development review process for employers by providing a path for administrative approval. However, this does not mean that there is not an opportunity for public input. As defined in the Town Zoning Code (Section 22.15.B.1.f), the Planning and Zoning Administrator may use discretion to require a neighborhood meeting and subject a project within the EEZ to the public review process depending on the anticipated impact of the project. For this site, a neighborhood meeting would be required. Within the EEZ zone, the administrative decision by the Planning and Zoning Administrator may be appealed by either the applicant or by Town Council at a public meeting. This provides further opportunity for potential public involvement. Concern regarding the loss of employment land  As previously stated in this report, a rezoning approval of this parcel to MHDR would diminish the limited supply of CPI employment land. A copy of the neighborhood meeting summary is provided as Attachment 7. Two letters of concern are included in Attachment 8 and twelve letters of support are included in Attachment 9. E. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION In summary, there are a number of key factors regarding the proposed rezoning. Those factors include:   The proposed rezoning conforms with the General Plan land use designation; however, it conflicts with key policies in the Your Voice, Our Future General Plan as presented in this report.  1. The proposal would significantly reduce an already limited supply of Commerce / Office Park land in Oro Valley. This type of land is needed to attract employers, businesses, and residents to Oro Valley and help maintain the community's long-term economic viability. 2. Although the proposal would be compatible with the adjacent residential properties, it has received mixed support from nearby residents. 3. By a vote of 4 to 3, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of this request. Staff's professional opinion, however, is respectfully a recommendation of denial. FISCAL IMPACT: No immediate fiscal impact is anticipated from this rezoning request. SUGGESTED MOTION: Town Council may wish to consider the following suggested motions for the proposed rezoning: I MOVE to ADOPT Ordinance No. (O)19-01, a rezoning from Campus Park Industrial to Medium High Density Residential, subject to the conditions in Attachment 11, finding that the request is consistent with the Your Voice, Our Future General Plan. OR I MOVE to DENY Ordinance No. (O)19-01, a rezoning from Campus Park Industrial to Medium High Density Residential, finding that the request is not consistent with the Your Voice, Our Future General Plan. Attachments Attachment 1 (O)19-01  Attachment 2: Zoning Map  Attachment 3: Tentative Development Plan  Attachment 4: Applicant Submittal  Attachment 5: Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes 11-8-18  Attachment 6: Staff Report to Planning and Zoning Commission  Attachment 7: October 15 Neighborhood Meeting Summary  Attachment 8: Letters of Concern  Attachment 9: Letters of Support  Attachment 10: General Plan Amendment Staff Report 9-19-18  Attachment 11: Conditions of Approval  ORDINANCE NO. (O)19-01 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, APPROVING A REZONING REQUEST BY WLB GROUP FOR A 15.23 ACRE PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF RANCHO VISTOSO BLVD AND VISTOSO COMMERCE LOOP TO BE REZONED FROM CAMPUS PARK IND USTRIAL (CPI)TO MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (MHDR) WHEREAS, WLB Group (the “Applicant”), applied for a rezoning from Campus Park Industrial (CPI) to Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) see map of property as depicted on Exhibit “A” attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the current zoning is designated as Campus Park Industrial (CPI); and WHEREAS, the Applicant wishes to change the zoning to Medium High Density Residential (MHDR); and WHEREAS, the Applicant proposed a Tentative Development Plan (TDP) proposing 72 detached single-story homes with a minimum lot size of 4,400 square feet, the TDP is attach hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated by reference; and WHEREAS, on September 19, 2018, Mayor and Council approved a Type 1 General Plan Amendment for this parcel that changed the land use designation to Medium Density Residential (MDR); and WHEREAS, the Applicant’s request for rezoning complies with the Your Voice, Our Future General Plan; and WHEREAS, on November 8, 2018, the Planning & Zoning Commission recommended approval to conditions for rezoning the property from Campus Park Industrial (CPI) to Medium High Density Residential (MHDR); and WHEREAS, the Town Council has duly considered the Applicant’s request for rezoning for a 15.23 acre property located on the northwest corner of Rancho Vistoso Blvd and Vistoso Commerce Loop to be rezoned from Campus Park Industrial to Medium High Density Residential (MHDR). NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona that the rezoning requested by the Applicant for the 15.23 acre property located on the northwest corner of Rancho Vistoso Blvd and Vistoso Commerce Loop to be rezoned from Campus Park Industrial to Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) is hereby approved attached hereto as Exhibit “C ”. NOW THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that: 1. All Oro Valley ordinances, resolutions or motions and parts of ordinances, resolutions or motions of the Council in conflict with the provision of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. 2. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, on this 9th day of January, 2019. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Joseph C. Winfield, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM : Michael Standish, Town Clerk Tobin Sidles, Legal Services Director Date: Date: EXHIBIT “A” MAP OF PROPERTY EXHIBIT “B” TENTATIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXHIBIT “C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning 1. The building height of homes in the future subdivision may not exceed one story, or eighteen (18) feet. 2. Lot 27 on the Tentative Development Plan, as depicted in Exhibit “A”, must have the east lot line adjusted as needed to not impact dense vegetation at the abutting drainage. 3. The proposed subdivision and any future residential development on the parcel may not exceed 5 homes per acre, the maximum allowed under the Medium Density Residential General Plan designation. Engineering 4. Vistoso Commerce Loop shall be re-striped to include a center two-way left turn lane, bikes lanes, and one through lane in each direction, from Rancho Vistoso Blvd to Oracle Rd. In addition, the corresponding pavement marking obliteration and related surface treatment shall be subject to Town Engineering requirements. Vistoso Commerce Loop improvements shall be completed prior to any permits being finaled for the subject property. Zoning Map Commerce Office Loop PAD Amendment (OV1801670) Attachment 1 SITE Existing Campus Park Industrial Proposed Medium High Density Residential Tangerine Road Tangerine RoadOracle RoadOracle RoadCampus Park Industrial SITE Rancho Vistoso BoulevardVis toso Comme rce LoopVistoso Village Dr ive Mortar Pestle C o u r tNEIGHBORHOOD 2PHASE 1Mortar Pestle DriveHammerst o n e L a n e Lost Artifact Lan eCla s s i c O v e r l o o k C o u r t15' LANDSCAPEBUFFERYARD 'A'15' LANDSCAPEBUFFERYARD 'A'25' LANDSCAPEBUFFERYARD 'B'15' LANDSCAPEBUFFERYARD 'A'REC. AREA0.9± AC.RANCHO VISTOSOURGENT CAREEASYCAREHEALTHY SKINDERMATOLOGYVISTOSOFUNERAL HOMENEIGHBORHOOD 2PHASE 2Aerial Photo Date = 2017C:\Users\cgoodwin\WLB Group\Paul Oland - CAG\Clay's Q-Drive\185050\185050-AE-01_2E\Planning\exhibits\II-1-A1 TDP.dwg Plotted: Dec. 06, 2018Inc.GroupTheWLB150'0'Inc.GroupTheWLBExhibit II-1-A1Tentative Development Plan65Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E - Tentative Development PlanWLB No. 185050-AE-01·PARCEL SIZE: 15.4± AC.·EXISTING ZONING: R.V. P.A.D. CAMPUS PARK INDUSTRIAL (CPI)·PROPOSED ZONING: R.V. P.A.D. - MHDR·MINIMUM LOT SIZE: 40' X 110'·PROPOSED DENSITY: 4.7 HOMES PER ACRE·PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT: SINGLE-STORY (18')·PROPOSED SETBACKS:FRONT: 15', PROVIDED THAT A DRIVEWAY AT LEAST 20' IN LENGTH IS MAINTAINED ON THE PROPERTYSIDE: 5'·PROPOSED OPEN SPACE: ³10%·RMA TIER 3 ESL DESIGNATION DOES NOT HAVE AN ESOS REQUIREMENT.SITE NOTES Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment Narrative OV1801670 June 2018 October 2018 Resubmitted December 7, 2018 PREPARED FOR: Anthem Equity Group, Inc. 1650 N. Kolb Rd. Suite 132 Tucson, Arizona 85715 PREPARED BY: The WLB Group, Inc. Attn: Paul Oland 4444 East Broadway Tucson, Arizona 85711 WLB No. 185050-AE-01 December 7, 2018 Q:\185050\AE-01 - Parcel 2E\01 Planning\04 Rezone or GPA\Site Analysis\RV-2E Rezoning Site Analysis.docx Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 i CONTENTS Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Part I – Inventory & Analysis .............................................................................................................. 3 1. Existing Land Uses ........................................................................................................................................... 5 A. Regional Context ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 B. Onsite Uses .............................................................................................................................................................. 5 C. Project Vicinity ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 c: Number of Stories of Surrounding Structures ........................................................................................................ 6 2. Environmentally Sensitive Lands .................................................................................................................... 6 A. ESL Categories Onsite .............................................................................................................................................. 6 B. Additional ESL Characteristics ................................................................................................................................. 6 C. Total acreage present onsite for each Conservation Category. .............................................................................. 7 3. Topography ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 A. Topographic Character & Features ......................................................................................................................... 7 4. Cultural / Archaeological / Historic Resources ................................................................................................ 8 A. Archaeological Survey Status / Results ................................................................................................................... 8 5. Hydrology ...................................................................................................................................................... 10 A. Offsite Watersheds ................................................................................................................................................ 10 B. Balanced / Critical Basins....................................................................................................................................... 10 C. Offsite Features Affecting or Affected by the Property ........................................................................................ 10 D. Area of Upstream Watersheds Greater than 100 CFS .......................................................................................... 10 E. Location / Ownership of Well Sites within 100’ of Site ........................................................................................ 10 F. Onsite Hydrology Characteristics .......................................................................................................................... 10 G. Existing Drainage Conditions along the Downstream Property Boundary ........................................................... 11 6. Wildlife .......................................................................................................................................................... 12 A. Arizona Game & Fish Dept. Letter ......................................................................................................................... 12 7. Viewsheds ..................................................................................................................................................... 26 8. Traffic ............................................................................................................................................................ 28 A. Connection to Arterial Roadway Network ............................................................................................................ 28 B. Arterial Roadways within One Mile of the Property ............................................................................................. 28 9. Recreation / Trails ......................................................................................................................................... 29 A. Trails, Parks and Recreation Areas within One Mile of the Property ................................................................... 29 Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 ii 10. Schools .......................................................................................................................................................... 30 A. Schools in the Vicinity the Property ...................................................................................................................... 30 B. Schools Expected to Serve the Project .................................................................................................................. 30 11. Water ............................................................................................................................................................ 30 A. Water Service Provider .......................................................................................................................................... 30 12. Wastewater .................................................................................................................................................. 30 A. Sewer Service Connection ..................................................................................................................................... 30 13. Exhibits .......................................................................................................................................................... 31 Exhibit I-1-A: Site Location Map ..................................................................................................................... 32 Exhibit I-1-B: Aerial Photograph ..................................................................................................................... 33 Exhibit I-1-C: Existing General Plan Future Land Use Designations ............................................................... 34 Exhibit I-1-D: Existing Zoning .......................................................................................................................... 35 Exhibit I-1-E: Existing Land Uses ..................................................................................................................... 36 Exhibit I-2-A: Environmentally Sensitive Lands ............................................................................................... 37 Exhibit I-3-A: Topography ............................................................................................................................... 38 Exhibit I-5-A: Offsite Watersheds .................................................................................................................... 39 Exhibit I-5-B: Onsite Hydrology Characteristics .............................................................................................. 40 Exhibit I-9-A: Trails, Parks & Recreation ......................................................................................................... 42 Exhibit I-10-A: Existing & Proposed Schools ................................................................................................... 43 Exhibit I-12-A: Sewer Service ........................................................................................................................... 44 Exhibit I-13-A: McHarg Composite Map ......................................................................................................... 45 Part II – Land Use Plan ..................................................................................................................... 47 1. Land Uses ...................................................................................................................................................... 49 A. Project Description ................................................................................................................................................ 49 B. General Plan Conformance ................................................................................................................................... 49 C. Flexible Design Options / Conservation Subdivision Design ................................................................................. 49 D. Effect on Existing Land Uses .................................................................................................................................. 49 2. Environmentally Sensitive Lands .................................................................................................................. 50 A. ESOS Selection & Preservation Methods .............................................................................................................. 50 3. Topography ................................................................................................................................................... 50 A. Design Response to Site Topography .................................................................................................................... 50 B. Slope Encroachment ............................................................................................................................................. 50 C. Hillside Conservation Areas ................................................................................................................................... 50 D. Quantified Site Disturbance .................................................................................................................................. 50 Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 iii 4. Cultural / Archaeological / Historic Resources .............................................................................................. 50 A. Resource Protection .............................................................................................................................................. 50 B. Treatment Plan ...................................................................................................................................................... 50 Arizona State Museum (ASM) Letter .............................................................................................................. 51 5. Hydrology ...................................................................................................................................................... 54 A. Design Response to Site Hydrology ....................................................................................................................... 54 B. Modifications of Drainage Patterns ...................................................................................................................... 54 C. Mitigation .............................................................................................................................................................. 54 D. Town Policy Conformance ..................................................................................................................................... 54 6. Wildlife .......................................................................................................................................................... 55 A. Mitigation .............................................................................................................................................................. 55 7. Viewsheds ..................................................................................................................................................... 55 A. Design Response to Site Viewsheds ...................................................................................................................... 55 B. ORSCOD / TRCOD Conformance ........................................................................................................................... 55 8. Traffic ............................................................................................................................................................ 55 A. Traffic Impact Analysis ........................................................................................................................................... 55 B. Proposed Rights-of-Way ........................................................................................................................................ 57 C. Proposed Pedestrian / Bicycle Circulation ............................................................................................................ 57 9. Recreation / Trails ......................................................................................................................................... 57 A. Offsite Trail Access ................................................................................................................................................ 57 B. Open Space Ownership ......................................................................................................................................... 57 10. Schools .......................................................................................................................................................... 58 A. Student Generation ............................................................................................................................................... 58 B. School Capacity...................................................................................................................................................... 58 11. Water ............................................................................................................................................................ 61 A. Water Demand ...................................................................................................................................................... 61 B. Water Service Provider & Capacity ....................................................................................................................... 61 12. Wastewater .................................................................................................................................................. 61 A. Sewer Service Method .......................................................................................................................................... 61 13. Bufferyards ................................................................................................................................................... 63 A. Mitigation (if applicable) ....................................................................................................................................... 63 14. Exhibits .......................................................................................................................................................... 64 Exhibit II-1-A1: Tentative Development Plan .................................................................................................. 65 Exhibit II-1-B: Proposed Zoning ....................................................................................................................... 66 Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 iv     Introduction    Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment  WLB No. 185050‐AE‐01 1 Introduction    This site analysis has been prepared in support of a proposed rezoning of Neighborhood 2 Parcel E (Parcel 2‐E) in the Rancho  Vistoso Planned Area Development.  This project is a proposed residential subdivision located at the northeast corner of  Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and Vistoso Commerce Loop (Please refer to Exhibit I‐1‐A: Site Location Map).  As a master  planned community, Rancho Vistoso appropriately included sufficient employment and commercial land to meet the needs  of its anticipated population.  However, over the years Rancho Vistoso has developed at roughly two‐thirds of its originally  envisioned  residential  density.  This  reduced  residential  density  is  negatively  impacting  the  underperforming  commercial/retail component of Rancho Vistoso and Oro Valley.  The proposed residential subdivision will also support the  ample Commerce / Office Park (COP) acreage in Innovation Park.  Of course, the General Plan’s future land use designations  reflect the original PAD design, and not the market reality that has manifested since then.  The General Plan was recently  amended to show this parcel as Medium Density Residential.    This proposal is to request a rezoning of the approximately 15.4‐acre site from Campus Park Industrial (CPI) to Medium High  Density Residential (MHDR) within the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development (PAD).  The proposed rezoning is  supported  by  several  factors,  including  its  proximity  to  existing commercial developments and other undeveloped  commercial property, compatibility with surrounding residential land uses, and adjacency to two significant roadways.  The  anticipated overall gross density of Parcel 2‐E is approximately 4.7 dwelling units per acre, which is compatible with existing  neighborhoods on adjacent parcels.      In order to make this project a reality, the appropriate land entitlements must be acquired for the property.  The current  land entitlements are not consistent with historic, current, or anticipated market demand; as such, the property owner is  focused on acquiring the necessary entitlements in the Town of Oro Valley.         Introduction Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 2 (This page intentionally blank) Part I – Inventory & Analysis Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 3 Part I – Inventory & Analysis Part I – Inventory & Analysis Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 4 (This page intentionally blank) Part I – Inventory & Analysis Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 5 1. Existing Land Uses A. Regional Context The property subject to this rezoning request consists of 15.4± acres located in the Town of Oro Valley in Section 29, Township 11S, Range 14E, Pima County Arizona. The site sits at the northeast corner of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and Vistoso Commerce Loop. The Pima County tax assessor designates the subject property as parcel numbers 223-02-014G and 223-02-012K. Please refer to Exhibit I-1-A: Site Location Map and Exhibit I-1-B: Aerial Photograph. B. Onsite Uses The subject property is currently undeveloped and vacant. The subject property is currently zoned Campus Park Industrial (CPI) within the Rancho Vistoso PAD. Please refer to Exhibit I-1-C: Existing General Plan Future Land Use Designations. C. Project Vicinity Please refer to Exhibit I-1-D: Existing Zoning and Exhibit I-1-E: Existing Land Uses. The subject property is surrounded by the following existing zonings and land uses: a/b: Existing Zoning and Land Uses North: Existing zoning: MDR (Medium Density Residential – PAD) Open Space (Open Space – PAD) Existing land use: Single-Family Residential and Big Wash. East: Existing zoning: Campus Park Industrial (CPI – PAD) MDR (Medium Density Residential – PAD) Existing land use: Light industrial manufacturing, clinic. Single-Family Residential. South: Existing zoning: C-1 (Community Commercial – PAD) Open Space (Open Space – PAD) Existing land use: Funeral Home Service. West: Existing zoning: Campus Park Industrial (CPI – PAD) Open Space (Open Space – PAD) Existing land use: Vacant and Big Wash. Part I – Inventory & Analysis Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 6 c: Number of Stories of Surrounding Structures Adjacent structures within a quarter mile of the subject property include both one and two-story single-family detached homes, the three-story commercial center Rancho Vistoso commercial center, and a Icagen, a four-story medical-tech research center. d: Pending Rezonings There are no pending rezonings within a quarter mile of the subject property. e: Conditionally Approved Zonings There are no conditionally approved zonings within a quarter mile of the subject property. f: Subdivisions and/or Development Plans Approved There are no subdivisions and/or development plans recently approved within a quarter mile of the subject property. g: Architectural Styles Used in Adjacent Projects The architectural styles used in adjacent projects are mainly wood frame or block homes that utilize a stucco and/or stone veneer and have either a flat or tiled roof. The architectural style used in Innovation Park are steel framed structures with steel panels and glass facades. 2. Environmentally Sensitive Lands A. ESL Categories Onsite The subject property consists of one Environmentally Sensitive Land category. Approximately 94% or 14.4± acres of the property is within the Resource Management Area Tier 3. The remaining portion of the site, which is along the western boundary of the property, is outside the Environmentally Sensitive Lands system. The vegetation community on the property is typical of the Sonoran Desertscrub Paloverde-Mixed Cacti, which includes Palo Verde, Mesquite, Cholla, Prickly pear, Ocotillo, and Barrel Cactus. B. Additional ESL Characteristics No regulated rock outcrops occur onsite. Please refer to Exhibit I-2-A: Environmentally Sensitive Lands. Part I – Inventory & Analysis Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 7 C. Total acreage present onsite for each Conservation Category. Conservation Category Acreage Major Wildlife Linkage 0 Critical Resource Area 0 Core Resource Area 0 RMA Tier 1 0 RMA Tier 2 0 RMA Tier 3 14.4.± None 1.0± 3. Topography A. Topographic Character & Features The topography of the subject property is characterized by relatively flat terrain. The property generally slopes downward from northeast to southwest towards the corner of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and Vistoso Commerce Loop. Elevations range from approximately 2,868 feet at the highest point on the northeast side to 2,846 feet at the lowest point on the southwest side of the property. The site contains no areas of regulated slopes greater than 15%. The site does not contain any restricted peaks, ridgelines or other significant topographic features. No areas of this development are subject to the ESL Hillside Area Category. Please refer to Exhibit I-3-A: Topography. Topographic Feature Category Acreage 15% to less than 18% 0 18% to less than 20% 0 20% to less than 25% 0 25% to less than 33% 0 33% or greater 0 Ridgelines 0 Rock Outcrops & Boulders 0 Part I – Inventory & Analysis Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 8 4. Cultural / Archaeological / Historic Resources A. Archaeological Survey Status / Results The subject property was intensively surveyed in 1986 by professional archaeologists, as part of the "Rancho Vistoso Survey" (see Prehistoric Settlement in the Canada Del Oro Valley, Arizona: The Rancho Vistoso Survey Project by D.B. Craig and H.D. Wallace 1987). The subject property was most recently surveyed in 2018 by SWCA Environmental Consultants. The survey resulted in the discovery of a small number of historic period artifacts. According to SWCA the low number and density of artifacts does not constitute an archaeological site as defined by ASM. No further archaeological study of the project area is recommended. If any human remains or funerary objects are discovered during the construction of this project, all work will stop within the area of the remains and Dr. Tod Pitezel, ASM assistant curator of archaeology, will be contacted immediately. Part I – Inventory & Analysis Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 9 Rancho Vistoso Survey Project Cover Page Part I – Inventory & Analysis Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 10 5. Hydrology A. Offsite Watersheds The off-site watershed impacting the project site is a minor watershed of approximately 10.7 acres, which contributes to two unnamed washes that follow a southwesterly route in the center of the property to Vistoso Commerce Loop. The entire property area is designated as being within a Clear Zone ‘X’ per the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), Panel 04019C1080L, revised June 16, 2011. The off-site terrain of the upstream watersheds is of a medium density residential character and the storm water provided by this development is conveyed southwest along Hammerstone Lane and Mortar Pestle Ct. Please refer to Exhibit I-5-A: Offsite Watersheds. B. Balanced / Critical Basins The entire Town is classified as a critical basin. C. Offsite Features Affecting or Affected by the Property The storm water released by the development upstream to the north is conveyed south along Hammerstone Lane and Mortar Pestle Ct., exiting through two channels onto the northeast edge of the property boundary. These flows are conveyed through the site in two natural drainages then under Vistoso Commerce Loop. D. Area of Upstream Watersheds Greater than 100 CFS There are no upstream offsite watersheds with 100-year discharges 100 CFS or greater. The off-site watershed that impact the site have a combined area of approximately 10.7 acres. E. Location / Ownership of Well Sites within 100’ of Site According to the Arizona Department of Water Resources, there are no wells located within 100 feet of the project site. F. Onsite Hydrology Characteristics Two shallow, natural drainages run in a southwest direction from the northeastern boundary to the southeastern edge of the project site. The entire site is typical of the upland desert biome, featuring a mix of cacti, mesquites, palo verde, and other species. Please refer to Exhibit I-5-B: Onsite Hydrology Characteristics i. Approximate 100-year floodplains with discharges equal to or greater than 50 cfs. There are no 100-year floodplains onsite with discharges equal to or greater than 50 cfs. Part I – Inventory & Analysis Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 11 ii. Areas of sheet flooding, with average depths The project site is not subject to sheet flooding. iii. Federally mapped floodways and floodplains The site is free of any federally mapped floodways and floodplains as illustrated with the FEMA FIRM Panel: 04019C1080L iv. Calculation of all 100-year peak discharges exceeding 50 cfs There are no onsite sub-basins with 100-year peak discharges exceeding 50 cfs. G. Existing Drainage Conditions along the Downstream Property Boundary Existing drainage conditions along the downstream property boundary have been considered and handled appropriately by the Rancho Vistoso master developer. Grading, culverts and channelization have been implemented to adequately protect the downstream property from a 100-year storm event. Part I – Inventory & Analysis Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 12 6. Wildlife A. Arizona Game & Fish Dept. Letter Part I – Inventory & Analysis Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 13 Arizona Game & Fish Dept. Letter (cont’d) Part I – Inventory & Analysis Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 14 Arizona Game & Fish Dept. Letter (cont’d) Part I – Inventory & Analysis Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 15 Arizona Game & Fish Dept. Letter (cont’d) Part I – Inventory & Analysis Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 16 Arizona Game & Fish Dept. Letter (cont’d) Part I – Inventory & Analysis Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 17 Arizona Game & Fish Dept. Letter (cont’d) Part I – Inventory & Analysis Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 18 Arizona Game & Fish Dept. Letter (cont’d) Part I – Inventory & Analysis Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 19 Arizona Game & Fish Dept. Letter (cont’d) Part I – Inventory & Analysis Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 20 Arizona Game & Fish Dept. Letter (cont’d) Part I – Inventory & Analysis Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 21 Arizona Game & Fish Dept. Letter (cont’d) Part I – Inventory & Analysis Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 22 Arizona Game & Fish Dept. Letter (cont’d) Part I – Inventory & Analysis Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 23 Arizona Game & Fish Dept. Letter (cont’d) Part I – Inventory & Analysis Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 24 Arizona Game & Fish Dept. Letter (cont’d) Part I – Inventory & Analysis Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 25 Arizona Game & Fish Dept. Letter (cont’d) Part I – Inventory & Analysis Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 26 7. Viewsheds Due to the relatively flat character of the project site, the perimeter areas are the only locations of high visibility from adjacent roadways and properties. The areas of higher vegetation densities in and near the western and south-eastern portions of the site perimeter reduce visibility into and across the property. Views from Oracle Road to the project site are obscured by the commercial businesses, most notably the Rancho Vistoso Center and associated commercial buildings. Businesses located on Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and Vistoso Commerce Loop Road create a secondary barrier impeding views into the project site. Please see the photos below. A. For proposals within the Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District and/or Oracle Road Scenic Corridor Overlay District, provide a Viewshed Analysis as defined in Section 27.10.D.3.f.iv.a.1. Not applicable. B. For proposals within the Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District and/or Oracle Road Scenic Corridor Overlay District, provide a View Preservation Plan (VPP) for nonresidential developments that meet the criteria defined in Section 27.10.D.3.f.iv.2. Not applicable. C. For proposals within the Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District and/or Oracle Road Scenic Corridor Overlay District, map and identify all Core Character Vegetation (CCV), in accordance with Section 27.10.D.3.f.iv.b. Not applicable. Part I – Inventory & Analysis Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 27 Left Photo: View from Oracle Road across Rancho Vistoso commercial center toward project site (site not visible). Right Photo: View from Oracle Road toward project site. (site not visible) Left Photo: View from Vistoso Village Drive looking south toward the site. Right Photo: View from Innovation Commerce Loop looking north toward the site. Left Photo: View from Innovation Commerce Loop looking north toward project site. Right Photo: Additional View from Innovation Commerce Loop looking north toward project site. Bottom Photo: View from Mortar Pestle Drive looking south toward the project site. Part I – Inventory & Analysis Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 28 8. Traffic A. Connection to Arterial Roadway Network Access to the subject property will be from Vistoso Village Drive and Vistoso Commerce Loop. These ingress/egress points are not impeded by existing medians in the collector roadways. B. Arterial Roadways within One Mile of the Property i. Existing and proposed right-of-way widths. See tables below. ii. Whether or not said widths conform to Oro Valley minimum requirements. See tables below. iii. Ownership (public or private). See tables below. iv. Whether or not rights-of-way jog or are continuous. See tables below. v. Number of travel lanes, theoretical capacity and design speed for existing streets. See tables below. vi. Present Average Daily Traffic (ADT) for existing streets. See tables below. vii. Describe surface conditions on existing streets providing access to the site. See tables below. viii. Program for completion of roadway and intersection improvements. See tables below. Rancho Vistoso Blvd. Road Segment: Oracle Rd. to Del Webb Blvd. Del Webb Blvd. to Moore Rd. Existing ROW: 150’ 150’ Ultimate ROW: 150’ 150’ Travel Lanes: 4 4 Capacity: 40,000 40,000 ADT (PAG 2017): 11,831 3,471 Speed Limit: 45 45 Condition: Paved Paved Scheduled Improvements: None Scheduled None scheduled Oracle Road Road Segment: Tangerine Road to Rancho Vistoso Blvd. Rancho Vistoso Blvd. to East Golder Ranch Drive Existing ROW: 200' 200’ Ultimate ROW: 200’ 200' Travel Lanes: 6 6 Capacity: 50,000 50,000 ADT (PAG 2008 & 2009): 34,000 28,500 Speed Limit: 55 55 Condition: Paved Paved Scheduled Improvements: None Scheduled None Sheduled Please refer to Exhibit I-8-A: Transportation. Part I – Inventory & Analysis Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 29 ix. Existing and proposed intersections on arterials within 1 mile of the site most likely to be used by traffic from the site. Arterial intersections within one mile of the site that will likely carry traffic generated by this development include Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and Oracle Road, and Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and Innovation Park Drive. x. Existing bicycle and pedestrian ways adjacent to the site and their connections with arterial streets, parks and schools. There is a signed bike route with a striped bike lane that extends the entire length of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard from Tangerine Road to Oracle Road. This route provides connectivity to Painted Sky Elementary School, Honey Bee Park, the Woodshade Linear Park, Sunset Park, Hohokam Park and the greater Oro Valley/Pima County bicycle-pedestrian path system. Refer to Exhibit I-8-A: Transportation. 9. Recreation / Trails A. Trails, Parks and Recreation Areas within One Mile of the Property Catalina State Park is located within one mile of the subject property. The Views golf course is a par 72 course that is located approximately one-half mile to the north of the project site. Striped bicycle lanes are located along the both sides of Rancho Vistoso Drive There is also a natural trail in Big Wash that weaves its way to the surrounding neighborhoods. This trail connects neighborhoods to one another and to the active recreation areas scattered throughout Rancho Vistoso. Surrounding Recreation Areas Park Name: Park Size (in Acres) Park Type (Active of Passive) Catalina State Park 5,500± Passive Big Wash Oro Valley Trailhead 0.5± Passive The Views Golf Course 180± Active Big Wash Park 0.5± Active Refer to Exhibit I-9-A: Trails, Parks & Recreation. Part I – Inventory & Analysis Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 30 10. Schools A. Schools in the Vicinity the Property Painted Sky Elementary School is approximately 2-miles southwest of the subject property. There is also a future Middle School Site that is designated within the Rancho Vistoso PAD approximately 2-miles southwest of the subject property. Basis Oro Valley is 2.5 miles to the south. Refer to Exhibit I-10-A: Existing & Proposed Schools. B. Schools Expected to Serve the Project Rancho Vistoso 2E is located within the Amphitheater Public School District. Existing schools in the District that may serve this project include: • Painted Sky Elementary School is located to the south of the project site and Moore Road. The school accommodates kindergarten through fifth grades. • Copper Creek Elementary School is located to the south of the project site and Tangerine Road. The school accommodates Kindergarten through fifth grades. • Ironwood Ridge High School is located to the southwest of the project site at Naranja Drive and Shannon Road. The school accommodates ninth through twelfth grades. • Basis Oro Valley, a charter school, is located to the southeast of the project site at Tangerine Road and Oracle Road. The school accommodates kindergarten through twelfth grades. 11. Water A. Water Service Provider This project will be served by the Oro Valley Water Utility. The exact nature of offsite improvements will be determined during the platting process, although none are anticipated. There is a 12” PVC water line that exists within the Rancho Vistoso Boulevard R.O.W. Contact information: Mark Moore – Oro Valley Water Utility, 11000 N. La Canada Drive, Oro Valley AZ 85737. 12. Wastewater A. Sewer Service Connection There is an existing 8" sewer line within the Rancho Vistoso Boulevard R.O.W. and an existing 8" sewer line within the Vistoso Commerce Loop R.O.W. Capacity is currently available for this project in the public sewer G-87-176, downstream from manhole 5734-1432. Refer to Exhibit I-12-A: Sewer Service. Part I – Inventory & Analysis Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 31 13. Exhibits Moore Road RanchoVist o s o BoulevardDriveParkInnovationTangerin e R o a d First Avenue77 Oracle RoadPROJECT LOCATION Q:\185050\AE-01 - Parcel 2E\01 Planning\04 Rezone or GPA\Site Analysis\Exhibits\Exh 1-1-A - Location Map.dwg Plotted: Sep. 24, 20181/2 Mile Inc. Group The WLB 0' Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E - PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 32 Part I - Inventory & Analysis Exhibit I-1-A Site Location Map Oracle Road(Highway 77)RANCHO V ISTOSO BLVD . VIST O S O C O M M E R C E L O O P VIST O S O VILLAGEDRIVEINNOVATIONPARK D RI V E OPEN SPACE (OS) OPEN SPACE (OS) COMMERCE / OFFICE PARK COMMERCE / OFFICE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL/ OFFICE (NCO) NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL/ OFFICE (NCO) NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL/ OFFICE (NCO) COMMERCE / OFFICE PARK PARK PARK MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (MDR) MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (MDR)Q:\185050\AE-01 - Parcel 2E\01 Planning\04 Rezone or GPA\Site Analysis\Exhibits\Exh 1-1-C - X GP.dwg Plotted: Aug. 22, 2018600' Inc. Group The WLB 0' Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E - PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 34 Exhibit I-1-C Existing General Plan Land Use Designations 37 38 Oracle RoadInnovationParkDrive77 InnovationParkDriveTanger i n e R o a dBIG WASHHONEY BEE WASH HONEY BEE CANYON PARK RanchoVis toso Bouleva rd HONEY BEE ARCHAEOLOGICAL PRESERVE CATALINA STATE PARK 1 MILE FROM SUBJECT PROPERTY THE VIEWS GOLF CLUB BIG WASH PARK Q:\185050\AE-01 - Parcel 2E\01 Planning\04 Rezone or GPA\Site Analysis\Exhibits\Exh 1-9-A - Rec & Trails.dwg Plotted: May. 31, 20181/3 Mile Inc. Group The WLB 0' Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E - PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 42 Part I - Inventory & Analysis LEGEND: SHARED USE PATH NATURAL TRAIL PARK AND RIDE AREA Exhibit I-9-A Trails, Parks & Recreation STRIPED BIKE LANE PARK OR RECREATION AREA VIST O S O C O M M E R C E L O O PRANCHO V ISTOSO BLVD . VIST O S O VILLAGE2850'2860' 2860' 2870' 2860' 2870' 2870'Q:\185050\AE-01 - Parcel 2E\01 Planning\04 Rezone or GPA\Site Analysis\Exhibits\Exh 1-13-A - Composite Map.dwg Plotted: Aug. 20, 2018200' Inc. Group The WLB 0' Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E - PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 45 Part I - Inventory & Analysis Contour Interval = 2 Ft. LEGEND: AREAS OF HIGH SITE VISIBILITY > 50% VEGETATIVE DENSITY < 50% VEGETATIVE DENSITY WATER SHED BOUNDARY GENERAL FLOW DIRECTION CRITICAL RESOURCE AREA RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AREA TIER 3 Exhibit I-13-A McHarg Composite Map Part I – Inventory & Analysis Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 46 (This page intentionally blank) Part II – Land Use Plan Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 47 Part II – Land Use Plan Part II – Land Use Plan Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 48 (This page intentionally blank)     Part II – Land Use Plan    Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment  WLB No. 185050‐AE‐01 49 1. Land Uses    A. Project Description    This project proposes a residential subdivision with a density of 4.7 dwelling units per acre, consisting of 72  single‐family attached homes on ~15.4‐acres (see Exhibits II‐1‐A1 and II‐1‐A2).  All homes will be site built  with a  one‐story height limit.  The lots will have a minimum size of 40’ x 110’ (4,400 sq. ft.), though lot and  home sizes will vary.  The average lot size will range from 4,400 sq. ft. to 5,518 sq. ft.  The architectural  design of these homes will be consistent with surrounding residential developments and will adhere to the  Rancho Vistoso PAD Design Guidelines.  They will be constructed out of materials such as stucco, adobe,  and wood frame, and will have either a tiled or flat roof.  Perimeter walls will meet the Rancho Vistoso  Design Guidelines, and landscape treatments and design will be similar to the existing landscapes of the  surrounding neighborhoods within the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development (PAD).    Refer to Exhibit II‐1‐A: Tentative Development Plan.    B. General Plan Conformance  The proposal is in conformance with the existing general plan land use of Medium Density Residential.  As  mentioned before, actual residential densities in Rancho Vistoso are significantly lower than envisioned at  the time the Rancho Vistoso PAD was originally designed over 30 years ago.  A commensurate drop in  demand for employment land has resulted, which has caused this property to remain undeveloped.  Little  potential exists for significant residential densities to develop anywhere near the subject property, meaning  that the chances of this property being developed for an employment use is very unlikely.  Significant  demand exists for additional residential development that is more compatible with surrounding land uses  than the existing employment entitlements. See Exhibit II‐1‐B Proposed Zoning.    C. Flexible Design Options / Conservation Subdivision Design    No flexible design options are requested.    D. Effect on Existing Land Uses    Since the subject property is currently vacant, there will be no negative impact to existing land uses.   Developing this property as single‐family residential will unify existing neighborhoods, increase the sense  of community, create a land use transition between the existing Campus Park Industrial and Medium  Density Residential, and eliminate any negative visual impacts to surrounding viewsheds that may have  been created by an employment development.    The subject property is predicted to generate 54 vehicle trips during the weekday AM peak hour and 73  vehicle trips during the weekday PM peak hour to the surrounding roadway network. The traffic volumes  associated with the project are not expected to have a significant impact on the surrounding roadway  system. If developed under the existing CPI zoning, the peak hour trip generation would likely be over 200.       Part II – Land Use Plan Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 50 2. Environmentally Sensitive Lands A. ESOS Selection & Preservation Methods This project will be in conformance with the ESL guidelines of the Zoning Code. The Resource Management Tier 3 designation does not require environmentally sensitive open space (ESOS). Additionally, any vegetation that is disturbed will meet the mitigation requirements as set forth in the Town of Oro Valley Zoning Code. 3. Topography A. Design Response to Site Topography Due to the relatively flat character of the subject property and the lack of challenging topographic constraints, the development of this property can proceed without special grading considerations. B. Slope Encroachment The subject property does not contain any regulated 15% or greater slopes, and as such there are no areas of encroachment. C. Hillside Conservation Areas There are no Hillside Conservation Areas on the subject property. D. Quantified Site Disturbance 100% of the site will be graded. Graded areas not to be improved with buildings or hardscape will be revegetated and will become either landscaped common area or recreation area. 4. Cultural / Archaeological / Historic Resources A. Resource Protection If any cultural resources are discovered during construction, state and local rules will be followed regarding the handling and treatment of such cultural resources. B. Treatment Plan SWCA Environmental Consultants surveyed the property in October of 2018. No archaeological sites were found. A treatment plan will not be required. Part II – Land Use Plan Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 51 Arizona State Museum (ASM) Letter Part II – Land Use Plan Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 52 Arizona State Museum (ASM) Letter, (cont.) Part II – Land Use Plan Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 53 Arizona State Museum (ASM) Letter, (cont.) Part II – Land Use Plan Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 54 5. Hydrology A. Design Response to Site Hydrology The density of this residential development will not have a significant impact on the hydrological characteristics of the site, especially compared to that of a commercial development. Additionally, this project will incorporate appropriate mitigation measures in accordance with the Town of Oro Valley Floodplain Management Code and the Drainage Criteria Manual. B. Modifications of Drainage Patterns Offsite flows from upstream watersheds will be collected in basins, channels and/or culverts directing the runoff through the project site to their existing outlet locations. C. Mitigation Drainage design within the proposed development will convey offsite and onsite flows using constructed channels, storm drain pipes, onsite detention basins in accordance with the Town of Oro Valley Floodplain Management Code and the Drainage Criteria Manual. Channel and basin geometry and construction will follow accepted standards regarding erosion and flow velocity control. Horizontal elements constructed within the project will be set at or near existing grade to minimize impacts to existing drainage patterns. Finished floor elevations will be set to one foot above the established base flood elevations of adjacent floodplains. Individual lots will be graded according to Town standards, which will provide adequate room and grades to handle stormwater runoff. D. Town Policy Conformance The post-developed 100-year discharges exiting the site will be maintained in their current condition or reduced by a maximum of 10% in accordance with Town policy, which requires all development to conform to “critical basin” requirements and not result in any adverse impacts for adjacent or downstream property owners.     Part II – Land Use Plan    Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment  WLB No. 185050‐AE‐01 55 6. Wildlife    A. Mitigation    Although the site is in a growth area designated by the Town and not required to provide ESOS, the  project will allow for open space connectivity within and beyond the project site through the design of  revegetated common areas and a centralized recreation area.  7. Viewsheds    A. Design Response to Site Viewsheds    This proposed residential development will restrict building heights to a single‐story maximum of 18 feet.   This will lessen the viewshed impact for neighboring developments to the surrounding views and vistas off‐ site compared to the height of structures currently allowed under the existing Campus Park Industrial  zoning.    With the subject property being relatively flat, the projects internal roadway network and homesites will  minimally disturb viewsheds. Bufferyards will be provided around the perimeter of the property to help  mitigate views into the site.    B. ORSCOD / TRCOD Conformance    This property does fall within the Oracle Road Scenic Corridor Overlay District (ORSCOD); however no  impact to viewsheds from Oracle are expected.  The project site is over a ¼ mile from Oracle Road. Views  from Oracle Road to the project site are obscured by the commercial businesses, most notably the Rancho  Vistoso Center and associated commercial buildings. Businesses located on Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and  Vistoso Commerce Loop Road create a secondary barrier impeding views into the future single‐story  development.    The architectural design of these homes will be consistent with surrounding residential developments and  will adhere to the Rancho Vistoso PAD’s design guidelines.  They will be constructed out of materials such  as stucco, adobe, and wood frame, and will have either a gabled, tiled or flat roof.    8. Traffic    A. Traffic Impact Analysis    Provide a traffic analysis to include:    i. The proposed internal circulation and  access to/from arterial streets, explaining location  and  rationale for placement.    The subject property has two ingress/egress points, a west access and an east access, which will  connect this neighborhood directly to Vistoso Commerce Loop.  These ingress/egress points have  been located at a safe distance from the arterial intersection of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard.      The west access will be constructed approximately 275 feet east of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard,  along the north side of Vistoso Commerce Loop Road. This access point will align with the existing          Part II – Land Use Plan    Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment  WLB No. 185050‐AE‐01 56 driveway that serves the Vistoso Memorial Chapel Funeral Home on the south side of Vistoso  Commerce Loop Road to create a four‐leg, un‐signalized intersection. (pg. 3 TIS).    The east access will be constructed along the north side of Vistoso  Commerce  Loop  Road,  approximately 800 feet east of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard.  This intersection will be a three‐leg, un‐ signalized intersection.  Both access points will offer full access to the proposed site. Traffic along  Vistoso Commerce Loop Road will continue to operate under free flow conditions at the proposed  access points while vehicles exiting the project site will be STOP controlled. (pg. 3 TIS).    ii. If off‐site road improvements are required, indicate which roads and time frame for improvements.    Roadways adjacent to and within one‐mile distance from the subject property are in good condition  and will not require any additional improvements.    iii. Projected ADT for internal circulation system at build out and level of service to all streets.  Include  a projection of traffic volumes and capacity analysis for intersections.    With and average daily trip (ADT) of 8‐10 trips per household, the 72 residential lots proposed  within this development will generate approximately 576‐720 ADT.  The local private streets inside  this development and the abutting arterial roadways, which are operating below capacity, will be  able to accommodate traffic generated from this project.    iv. Impact to existing development abutting off‐site streets.    Rezoning  the  subject  property  from  Campus  Park  Industrial  (CPI)  to  Medium  High  Density  Residential (MHDR) will significantly reduce the traffic impact to surrounding developments and  off‐site streets, compared to the existing Campus Park Industrial entitlements.    v. Capacity analyses for proposed internal and off‐site streets, including right‐of‐way and pavement  widths, geometrics, design speeds and traffic control improvements needed.    Rancho Vistoso Boulevard    Rancho Vistoso Boulevard is a four‐lane (two in each direction) paved arterial road with a divided  landscaped median and left turn lanes, with a posted speed limit of 45 mph.  The existing and  ultimate right‐of‐way is 150 feet, which is continuous.  According to the Pima Association of  Governments (PAG) 2016 Traffic Volumes, the average daily trip volume (ADT) for this arterial  roadway ranges from 3,682 to 15,333 ADT. The designed capacity for Rancho Vistoso Blvd. is  40,000 ADT    Vistoso Commerce Loop    Vistoso Commerce Loop is a four‐lane (two in each direction) minor collector road.  The posted  speed limit of Vistoso Commerce Loop is 35 mph.  The existing and ultimate right‐of‐way width is  80 feet. According to the Pima Association of Governments (PAG) 2017 Traffic Volumes, the  average daily trip volume (ADT) for this roadway ranges is 1,576 ADT.    vi. A description of improvements required for those streets described in sub‐paragraph v. above.    Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and Vistoso Commerce Loop are in good condition and will not require  any improvements to accommodate by this development.   Part II – Land Use Plan Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 57 vii. The party/agency that the applicant believes to be responsible for making necessary improvements. Not applicable. viii. Evidence that proposed turning movements will meet safety standards in relationship to traffic volumes. The two proposed ingress/egress points onto Vistoso Commerce Loop are located a safe distance from the arterial intersection of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard. Vegetation adjacent to these ingress/egress points will be maintained to provide safe site visibility for vehicles exiting the site and will allow safe turning movements to and from the site. The proposed residential roadways meet the Town of Oro Valley Minimum Design Standards. B. Proposed Rights-of-Way The proposed roadways within this development will have a right-of-way width of 50 feet and will meet the Town of Oro Valley Minimum Design Standards. The internal roads of this development will be owned and maintained by the HOA if the project is gated. Otherwise, the roads will be public. C. Proposed Pedestrian / Bicycle Circulation The proposed residential development will make pedestrian and bicycle connections to Vistoso Commerce Loop. According to the Oro Valley Bikeways Map Existing Routes 2017, there is a signed bicycle-route with an on-street bike lane that runs along Rancho Vistoso Boulevard. Innovation Park Drive has a paved shoulder. Sidewalks will be constructed on both sides of the private streets within the project site and will connect to the existing sidewalks along Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and Vistoso Commerce Loop. 9. Recreation / Trails A. Offsite Trail Access Big Wash Park and Catalina State Park are located within one mile of the subject property. Additionally, there are approximately 3.0± miles of offsite trails and walking paths that exist within one mile of the site. The nearby neighborhood park provides amenities such as shaded playground equipment and turf areas. The new Town Big Wash Trailhead is ½ mile northwest of the subject property. Additional private golf facilities are available at The Views Golf Course which is a public/private course located within one mile of the subject property. B. Open Space Ownership The future HOA of this proposed development will own and maintain the open space within this project. Part II – Land Use Plan Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 58 10. Schools A. Student Generation This proposed development is expected to generate up to 15 elementary students, 16 middle school students, and 9 high school students (using the accepted standard student multiplier of 0.2075 elementary school students per home, 0.2197 middle school students per home, and 0.1282 high school students per home). B. School Capacity According to the letter supplied by the Amphitheater School District, there is available capacity for this proposed development. Part II – Land Use Plan Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 59 Amphitheater Capacity Letter Part II – Land Use Plan Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 60 Amphitheater Capacity Letter (cont’d) Part II – Land Use Plan Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 61 11. Water A. Water Demand A good estimate for domestic water usage is 230 gallons per day per lot dry weather flow. With 72 lots being proposed in this development the total domestic water use is projected at 16,560 gallons per day. B. Water Service Provider & Capacity Oro Valley Water has the capacity and infrastructure available to serve this project. This project will connect to the existing water main lines within the rights-of-way of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and Vistoso Commerce Loop and/or Vistoso Village Drive. 12. Wastewater A. Sewer Service Method Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department will provide sewer service to this development. Capacity is currently available for this project in the public sewer G87-176, downstream from manhole 5734-1432. Part II – Land Use Plan Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 62 Wastewater Service Provider Letter Part II – Land Use Plan Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 63 13. Bufferyards A. Mitigation (if applicable) A landscape bufferyard will be provided around the entire perimeter of the project site to help soften any visual impacts to surrounding landowners. The bufferyards will be composed from a variety of native vegetation and will help blend this residential neighborhood with the surrounding developments. They will be a minimum of 15-25 feet wide and will be in accordance with the Bufferyard “A” and “B” criteria in the Town of Oro Valley Zoning Code. Part II – Land Use Plan Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E PAD Amendment WLB No. 185050-AE-01 64 14. Exhibits Rancho Vistoso BoulevardVis toso Comme rce LoopVistoso Village Dr ive Mortar Pestle C o u r tNEIGHBORHOOD 2PHASE 1Mortar Pestle DriveHammerst o n e L a n e Lost Artifact Lan eCla s s i c O v e r l o o k C o u r t15' LANDSCAPEBUFFERYARD 'A'15' LANDSCAPEBUFFERYARD 'A'25' LANDSCAPEBUFFERYARD 'B'15' LANDSCAPEBUFFERYARD 'A'REC. AREA0.9± AC.RANCHO VISTOSOURGENT CAREEASYCAREHEALTHY SKINDERMATOLOGYVISTOSOFUNERAL HOMENEIGHBORHOOD 2PHASE 2Aerial Photo Date = 2017C:\Users\cgoodwin\WLB Group\Paul Oland - CAG\Clay's Q-Drive\185050\185050-AE-01_2E\Planning\exhibits\II-1-A1 TDP.dwg Plotted: Dec. 06, 2018Inc.GroupTheWLB150'0'Inc.GroupTheWLBExhibit II-1-A1Tentative Development Plan65Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E - Tentative Development PlanWLB No. 185050-AE-01·PARCEL SIZE: 15.4± AC.·EXISTING ZONING: R.V. P.A.D. CAMPUS PARK INDUSTRIAL (CPI)·PROPOSED ZONING: R.V. P.A.D. - MHDR·MINIMUM LOT SIZE: 40' X 110'·PROPOSED DENSITY: 4.7 HOMES PER ACRE·PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT: SINGLE-STORY (18')·PROPOSED SETBACKS:FRONT: 15', PROVIDED THAT A DRIVEWAY AT LEAST 20' IN LENGTH IS MAINTAINED ON THE PROPERTYSIDE: 5'·PROPOSED OPEN SPACE: ³10%·RMA TIER 3 ESL DESIGNATION DOES NOT HAVE AN ESOS REQUIREMENT.SITE NOTES 12/18/2018 Print Staff Report https://destinyhosted.com/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=2691&rev_num=0&mode=External&reloaded=true&id=67682 1/7 Planning & Zoning Commission Special Session AGENDA ITEM: 2. Meeting Date:11/08/2018 Requested by:Bayer Vella, Community and Economic Development Case Number: OV1801670 SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING A REZONING REQUEST FROM CAMPUS PARK INDUSTRIAL TO MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL FOR AN APPROXIMATELY 15-ACRE PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF RANCHO VISTOSO BLVD AND VISTOSO COMMERCE LOOP, OV1801670 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of the proposed rezoning request. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The purpose of this request is to consider a rezoning application to change the zoning from Campus Park Industrial (CPI) to Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) within the Rancho Vistoso PAD (Attachment 1). The proposed development is approximately 15 acres located at the northeast corner of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and Vistoso Commerce Loop. The approval of this request would allow a residential subdivision with a similar density and design to adjacent neighborhoods (Attachment 2). The applicant's proposal (Attachment 3) depicts two Tentative Development Plans (TDP). TDP 1 proposes 69 attached single-story homes and TDP 2 includes 75 detached single-story homes. Both proposals include a minimum lot size of 4,000 square feet. As a whole, the proposed densities of 4.5 to 4.8 dwelling units per acre is consistent with the adjacent neighborhoods, which have densities of 5.4 and 2.9 dwelling units per acre. The Mayor and Council approved a Type 1 General Plan Amendment for this parcel at their regularly scheduled meeting on September 19, 2018. The land use designation was changed from Commerce/Office Park to Medium Density Residential (MDR). Prior to this action, the Planning and Zoning Commission and Community & Economic Development Department staff recommended denial of the General Plan Amendment request based on General Plan policy direction. One neighborhood meeting was held on October 15, 2018 for the rezoning, which was the third meeting for the site. Issues of concern raised by neighbors included the following: 1. Concern over the preservation of existing views 2. Building height 3. Buffer yards between the proposed project and neighbors to the north 4. Density and compatibility of surrounding homes 5. Traffic and circulation 6. Uses that would be permitted under existing CPI zoning and if design standards would be compatible with surrounding land uses 7. Neighbor ability to have input for a Campus Park Industrial development proposal 12/18/2018 Print Staff Report https://destinyhosted.com/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=2691&rev_num=0&mode=External&reloaded=true&id=67682 2/7 8. Concern regarding the loss of employment land This report addresses concerns raised at the most recent neighborhood meeting. All rezoning requests are reviewed for conformance with the General Plan land use designation, goals and policies. While the proposal for residential zoning is in conformance with the newly designated land use and is compatible with adjacent residential properties, staff's concerns raised during the General Plan Amendment process have remain unchanged. On balance, it is staff's professional opinion that this proposal is not in conformance with the policies of the Your Voice, Our Future General Plan. The proposal, if approved, will significantly reduce an already limited supply of CPI land in Oro Valley, which is needed to attract employers. Increasing employment opportunities and supporting the local economy is a major emphasis of the General Plan. Furthermore, enabling more residential units closer to existing and future CPI and commercial development creates land use compatibility concerns. BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: A. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND CONTEXT Zoning Context The existing zoning for the property and the surrounding areas are provided in Attachment 1. The subject property is currently designated as Campus Park Industrial. Nearby zoning designations include additional Campus Park Industrial zoning, Medium Density Residential, and Community Commercial. Site Conditions 15.23 acres Property is vacant Property History June 1987: Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development, Office / Research Park (CPI) Zoning March 2008: Development plan / preliminary plat for "Innovation Commerce Campus" approved by the Town Council April 2009: Final plat for "Innovation Commerce Campus" approved by the Town Council December 2009: One year extension for the development plan / preliminary plat March 2010: Development plan / preliminary plat approvals for "Innovation Commerce Campus" expired. Town Council declined to provide a requested time extension. December 2011: General Plan amendment request for High Density Residential denied by the Town Council September 2018: General Plan amendment request for Medium Density Residential approved by Town Council Existing Zoning The existing and proposed zoning designations can be found in Attachment 1. The property is currently zoned as Campus Park Industrial (CPI), provided below: Rancho Vistoso PAD Campus Park Industrial (CPI): The office park at Rancho Vistoso is intended to be a well-designed industrial and office development set respectively into the desert. It will provide a truly mixed use community by providing jobs for residents of Rancho Vistoso. The office park will include a variety of office and research and development uses along with ancillary uses to serve the population of the office park. These ancillary uses may include a restaurant, a bank, a child care 12/18/2018 Print Staff Report https://destinyhosted.com/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=2691&rev_num=0&mode=External&reloaded=true&id=67682 3/7 facility, a health club/recreation facility and others, as long as they are not more obnoxious than the permitted uses. B. APPLICANT'S REQUEST Proposed Zoning The applicant's request is to change the current zoning designation to Medium High Density Residential (MHDR), provided below: Rancho Vistoso PAD Medium High Density Residential (6-8 homes per acre): Medium high density is located in areas with minimal natural constraints. It is intended to provide individual single family ownership through patio homes and townhouses. The applicant is proposing a lower density than what is allowed per MHDR zoning (6-8 homes per acre) because the potential builder wishes to use the smaller lot sizes enabled in MHDR versus MDR. MHDR allows uses of a minimum lot size of 4,000 square feet. In comparison, the minimum lot sizes in the adjacent subdivisions are 5,000 square feet with an MDR designation. C. GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE ANALYSIS Rezoning applications are reviewed for conformance with the Your Voice, Our Future General Plan Land Use Map, Vision, Guiding Principles, Goals and Policies. On balance, staff finds that the proposed rezoning does not conform to the General Plan due to the following: loss of high quality employment area when the amount of CPI land in Oro Valley is already very limited. enabling more residential units closer to existing and future CPI and commercial development creates land use compatibility concerns Below is a more detailed General Plan analysis: Land Use Map The proposed rezoning does conform with the Medium High Density General Plan land use designation. The General Plan Vision "Oro Valley strives to be a well-managed community that provides all residents with opportunities for quality living. Oro Valley will keep its friendly, small-town, neighborly character, while increasing services, employment and recreation. The Town's lifestyle continues to be defined by a strong sense of community, a high regard for public safety and an extraordinary natural environment and scenic views" Staff finds that the proposed rezoning does not conform with the Your Voice Vision because it decreases potential employment opportunities. Guiding Principles, Goals, and Policies a) Employment opportunities and economic growth: The Your Voice, Our Future General Plan places a significant emphasis on increasing and not just maintaining employment land. As stated in previous General Plan Amendment staff reports (Attachment 4) the proposed rezoning does not support General Plan goals and policies of growing high quality employment opportunities and supporting a strong and diverse economy. Specific goals and policies include: Goal A: Long-term financial and economic stability and sustainability. Goal B: A robust localeconomy and job market that provide opportunities for quality employment,build on Oro Valley’s assets and encourage high- quality growth. 12/18/2018 Print Staff Report https://destinyhosted.com/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=2691&rev_num=0&mode=External&reloaded=true&id=67682 4/7 Goal C: A strong sector of targeted industries, including bioscience and aerospace, that provide opportunities for synergy and growth. Policy E.1: Develop a diversified and robust economic base to support long- term economic stability. Policy E.3. Promote Oro Valley as an ideal destination for economic activity, tourism, shopping, cultural attractions, research and development. Oro Valley has significantly lower CPI acreage than communities of similar size, and the proposed rezoning would further diminish the less than 200 buildable acres of CPI related land available to attract high quality employers to the community. Retaining the current use on this property would benefit the long term economic viability of the community more than adding a small development of up to 74 homes. Unless a residential development is of substantial size, it will not contribute to the overall viability of existing commercial uses. Currently, approximately 3,647 residential units are currently entitled for development. The proposed 74 home subdivision is a mere 2% of this total, which will have no meaningful economic impact when taken in the context of the larger number of residential units anticipated. While the request is consistent with the General Plan land use designation, staff wants to reiterate previous concerns related to the loss of CPI related employment area and finds that the proposed zoning does not support the aforementioned goals and policies of the General Plan. b) Transition between land uses and compatibility: Goal X of the General Plan emphasizes an effective transition between differing land uses and intensities in the community. The subject property is located adjacent to Campus Park Industrial, Medium Density Residential, and Neighborhood Commercial zoning as shown in Attachment 1. The parcel is located on a street corner with abutting properties being single-family residential to the north, and warehouse and distribution center and dermatology office to the northeast. To the south and east, there are Commerce / Office Park and Neighborhood Commercial / Office properties separated by Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and Vistoso Commerce Loop. The proposed development is compatible with the abutting residential subdivisions. The applicant is proposing buffer yards along roadways and between adjacent residences and businesses to the extent required by the zoning code. It should be noted that the subdivision to the north has a density of 5.4 homes per acre, and the subdivision to the northwest across Vistoso Village Dr. has a density of 2.9 homes per acre. A new residential development on this site, however, will position more homes closer to existing and future commercial and Commerce / Office Park development. The proposed subdivision will place residents directly across from Vistoso Funeral Home and future CPI development across Rancho Vistoso Blvd. Currently, 20 homes would be adjacent to CPI use on the parcel. If the parcel is zoned for residential purposes, this would cause up to 32 homes to be potentially impacted by surrounding non-residential land uses. More residences will increase pressure on existing and future businesses. Residential use on this parcel could place more homes next to dissimilar land uses, which, in this sense, would not be an appropriate transition or buffer between land uses. The applicant is proposing a 15 foot landscaped buffer yard along the northern edge of the parcel. Retaining CPI uses on the parcel would require a 15-30 foot landscaped buffer yard with a likely 28 foot access drive and an additional 2-17 foot drive depending on site design. A CPI use would likely include a minimum 60 foot separation between residences and buildings. This anticipated separation is greater than afforded by MHDR residential development. Per the Town Zoning Code, the proposed residential subdivision requires no buffer yard to adjacent residences or businesses, but the applicant is proposing a 20 foot buffer including the building setback. Concern over the impact of loading zones to adjacent residences have been voiced by neighbors during the public participation process. CPI zoning would allow for uses that may require loading zones. The Town Zoning Code outlines specific restrictions for loading zones to limit impacts to adjacent land uses. Loading 12/18/2018 Print Staff Report https://destinyhosted.com/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=2691&rev_num=0&mode=External&reloaded=true&id=67682 5/7 zones must be placed a minimum of 30 feet from residential areas and must be fully screened with an opaque wall and landscaping to minimize impacts. Some uses allowed under CPI zoning on this parcel will not require loading zones, such as office oriented development. So, it is possible that a future employment use on this parcel would not have a need for a loading zone(s). However, if needed, loading zones must comply with the specific standards within the Zoning Code that ensure appropriate transitions and buffers. D. ZONING CODE CONFORMANCE ANALYSIS Site Design: The request and tentative development plans were found to be in conformance with the requirements specified in the Town Zoning Code and Rancho Vistoso PAD. Drainage: There are two minor drainage ways that exist on the site with a southern flow direction. The subject parcel lies outside of any 100-year floodplains with onsite discharges equal to or greater than 50 cfs. The subdivision must be designed so post-developed drainage conditions are consistent with pre-developed conditions in accordance with Town drainage requirements. General Traffic: The proposed subdivision will have will have two ingress/egress points at Vistoso Commerce Loop and Vistoso Village Drive from internal streets. A traffic impact analysis was provided with the Site Analysis to evaluate the effect of additional traffic on surrounding roadways. Internal streets and access drives within the development will be constructed to Town code standards. Off-site improvements will include re-striping Vistoso Commerce Loop as described in Attachment 7. Public roadway improvements to be completed by the developer shall be at their expense and will require approval and a permit issued from the Town Engineer ’s office. E. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION The following notice has been provided: Notification to all property owners within 600 feet Notification to all interested parties who signed in at neighborhood meetings Homeowners association mailing Advertisement in The Daily Territorial Posting on property Posting at Town Hall and on Town Website One neighborhood meeting for the rezoning was held on October 15, 2018 with approximately 13 residents in attendance. The main topics discussed at this meeting included: Concerns over the preservation of existing views The applicant explained that homes would be limited to single story homes at 18 feet to mitigate view impacts. Building height The applicant explained that homes would be limited to one story and 18 feet. This is a condition of approval in Attachment 7. Buffer yards between the proposed project and neighbors to the north The applicant explained that they are proposing a 15 foot landscape buffer yard between the proposed homes and the existing subdivision to the north and abutting CPI uses. As previously stated in this report, a CPI use would provide a greater required buffer yard and setback between adjacent property lines and a building. Density and compatibility with surrounding homes The applicant explained that the proposed density would be similar to adjacent neighborhoods. As previously stated in this report, surrounding residential densities are 2.9 and 5.4 homes per acre. The proposed density would be compatible with surrounding neighborhoods at up to 4.8 homes per acre. Traffic and circulation 12/18/2018 Print Staff Report https://destinyhosted.com/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=2691&rev_num=0&mode=External&reloaded=true&id=67682 6/7 Engineering staff addressed traffic concerns and circulation, which did not warrant substantial changes to the TDP. Uses that would be permitted under existing CPI zoning and if design standards would be compatible with surrounding land uses The applicant explained potential uses under the CPI zoning as well as required buffer yards and height associated with a CPI development. As stated previously, CPI development standards would require greater setbacks and buffer yards compared to residential uses. Loading zones, if needed, are required to be fully screened. While the allowed height would be up to 36 feet, specific design standards would help mitigate potential impacts. Neighbor ability to have input for a Campus Park Industrial development proposal Currently, the site is located within the Economic Expansion Zone (EEZ), which is meant to streamline the development review process for employers by providing a path for administrative approval. However, this does not mean that there is no opportunity for public input. As defined in the Town Zoning Code (Section 22.15.B.1.f), the Planning and Zoning Administrator may use discretion to require a neighborhood meeting and subject a project within the EEZ to the public review process depending on the anticipated impact of the project. Typically, a neighborhood open house is provided for larger development proposals in EEZ. Within the EEZ zone, the administrative decision by the Planning and Zoning Administrator may be appealed by either the applicant or by Town Council at a public meeting. This provides further opportunity for potential public involvement. Concern regarding the loss of employment land As previously stated in this report, a rezoning approval of this parcel to MHDR would diminish the limited supply of CPI employment land. A copy of the neighborhood meeting summary is provided as Attachment 5 and two letters of concern are included in Attachment 6. E. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION In summary, there are a number of key factors regarding the proposed rezoning. Those factors include: 1. The proposed rezoning conforms with the General Plan land use designation, however, it conflicts with key policies in the Your Voice, Our Future General Plan as presented in this report. 2. The proposal would significantly reduce an already limited supply of Commerce / Office Park land in Oro Valley. This type of land is needed to attract employers, businesses, and residents to Oro Valley and help maintain the community's long-term economic viability. 3. Although the proposal would be compatible with the adjacent residential properties, it is has received mixed support from nearby residents. Based on the aforementioned factors, staff recommends denial of the proposed rezoning. FISCAL IMPACT: No immediate fiscal impact is anticipated from this PAD Amendment request. SUGGESTED MOTION: The Planning and Zoning Commission may wish to consider the following suggested motions for the proposed PAD Amendment: I MOVE to recommend denial of the Vistoso Commerce Loop PAD Amendment from Campus Park Industrial to Medium High Density Residential, based on the finding that the application is not in conformance with the Your Voice, Our Future General Plan. 12/18/2018 Print Staff Report https://destinyhosted.com/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=2691&rev_num=0&mode=External&reloaded=true&id=67682 7/7 OR I MOVE to recommend approval of the Vistoso Commerce Loop PAD Amendment from Campus Park Industrial to Medium High Density Residential, based on the finding that _______________________________________. Attachments Attachment 1: Zoning Map Attachment 2: Location Map Attachment 3: Applicant Submittal Attachment 4: GPA Staff Report Attachment 5: October 15 Neighborhood Meeting Summary Attachment 6: Letters of Concern Attachment 7: Rezoning Conditions Neighborhood Meeting Summary Vistoso Commerce Loop PAD Amendment (Rezoning) Request October 15, 2018, 6:00 – 7:30 pm Town Council Chambers, 11000 N. La Cañada Dr. 1. Introductions and Welcome Meeting facilitator Jeanette De Renne, Town of Oro Valley Long Range Principal Planner, introduced Hannah Oden, Planner, as the project manager processing the application. Ms. De Renne summarized the review process for the application and public participation opportunities. Approximately 15 residents and interested parties attended the meeting. In attendance were incoming Mayor Joseph Winfield and Planning and Zoning Commission Chair Charlie Hurt. 2. Staff Presentation Hannah Oden, Planner, provided a presentation that included:  Purpose of the meeting  Difference between a general plan amendment and rezoning request  Existing and proposed zoning  Applicant’s proposal for the property  History of the parcel and previous proposals  General plan and zoning code evaluation criteria  Prior neighbor comments 3. Applicant Presentation The applicant Mr. Paul Oland, The WLB Group, provided a presentation detailing the applicant’s proposal. The applicant’s presentation included:  Overview of the project  Overview of what could be developed under existing and proposed zoning  Potential residential development concepts for the subject property  Buffer yard proposal to separate project from existing residences 4. Public Questions and Comments Following is a summary of the topics, questions and comments discussed at the meeting.  Height of the proposed homes and potential view impacts  Clarification on buffer yard design  Screening or yard walls around future homes  How would the land use intensity be different between Campus Park Industrial (CPI) and residential zoning?  What would be the impact on traffic?  What would the lighting impacts be from the homes? How would this be enforced?  Could the access be moved to Rancho Vistoso Blvd or a second access be added on Vistoso Commerce Loop?  Previous development requests for the property  Design and cost of the homes  If the rezoning request is denied, would the current zoning designation be retained?  Clarification on the intent of Town Council when the General Plan Amendment was approved  What would the review and approval process entail if the parcel stays in the Economic Expansion Zone?  Would walking trails be included within the proposed development?  Would the development have monument signs?  What are the existing efforts to market Campus Park Industrial areas to employers?  If the parcel retained the CPI zoning, what would be the allowed building height? How would the loading zones be configured in relation to adjacent residences?  Concern over CPI compatibility with surrounding neighborhoods and businesses.  Concern over loss of CPI employment land. Property owner, Mr. Ford, addressed some of the questions related to the proposed development throughout the question and comment period. Mr. Oland addressed the remaining questions. David Laws, Town Permitting Division Manager, addressed questions related to traffic. Ms. De Renne closed the meeting, thanked everyone for their attendance and encouraged everyone to contact Ms. Oden, the Town’s project manager processing the application, with any additional thoughts, comments or concerns or to visit OVprojects.com for additional information. From: Marilyn Rego <mmrego@centurylink.net> Sent: Monday, October 15, 2018 10:18 AM To: Oden, Hannah Subject: Rezoning Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Please leave the CPI as is. No more residential. Marilyn Rego 2353 E Indian Town Way Oro Valley, AZ 85755 520 575 4022 October 15, 2018 Oro Valley Town Council, I am writing in opposition to the proposed amendment to the general plan future land use from commerce/office part to medium density residential for the 15-acre property located at the northwest corner of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and Vistoso Commerce Loop. I have opposed this change in the past and continue to oppose the proposed change. At the conclusion of the last set of meetings regarding the same/similar request for change in fall 2017 the town of Oro Valley stated that the results of the town’s study was that the need for commercial property in Oro Valley was a priority and this parcel of land was to remain commerce/office park. There is commercial property directly across from the proposed Vistoso Commerce Loop entrance – a crematorium. Commercial property continues along that side of the street in both directions. Commercial property continues on the same side of the street on both sides of 15-acre property. This property should remain commercial. Commercial property is generally occupied for 12-14 hours of a business day versus 24 hours a day with homes and the multiple vehicle per home vehicular traffic. The exit on to VIsotso Viallge Drive will negatively impact all of us who currently live in the Vistso Vistas developments. Traffic making a left turn off Vistoso Village Drive onto Rancho Vistoso Boulevard will be backed up and there will be competition from the vehicles attempting to exit that development onto Vistoso Village Drive. Leave the property zoned commercial. Sincerely, Kathryn A. Di Pierro 2220 E. Rio Vistoso Lane From: Melissa Barenthsen <rbarenthse@aol.com> Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2018 6:06 PM To: Oden, Hannah Subject: Rezoning Rancho Vistoso Parcel 2E I live directly west of the proposed parcel up for rezoning discussion. I am in favor of the rezoning to residential MDR. I think this would be less of an impact on the residential areas surrounding the partial. The plan to put single story houses would do less to restrict our views of the mountains. I also think that the proposed 69 houses would be a better fit for the area since the land is sided on two sides by residential already and the streets would be a natural boundary between commercial and residential. This area is in need of more residential housing and this small partial would help with the need for affordable housing for workers in this area. There is undeveloped commercial acerage in excess in this area and this small plat would not make that much difference to commercial development in the area. Thank you, Melissa Barenthsen 13224 N Classic Overlook Court    Town Council Regular Session Item # 1. Meeting Date:09/19/2018   Requested by: Bayer Vella Submitted By:Michelle Stine, Town Clerk's Office Department:Community and Economic Development Information SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: RESOLUTION NO. (R)18-36, DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN FUTURE LAND USE MAP FROM COMMERCE/OFFICE PARK (COP) TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (MDR) FOR A 15 ACRE PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD AND VISTOSO COMMERCE LOOP RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends denial of this request. Town staff concurs with the Commission's unanimous findings. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The purpose of this request is to consider a Type 1 (Major) General Plan Amendment application to change the existing land use designation from Commerce/Office Park to Medium Density Residential (MDR) (Attachment 2). The subject property is approximately 15 acres, located at the northwest corner of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and Vistoso Commerce Loop. The approval of this request would allow a residential subdivision with a similar density and design as nearby single-family neighborhoods. All General Plan amendment requests are reviewed for conformance with the overall Plan as well as specific amendment criteria. This proposal is not in conformance with the intent of the Your Voice, Our Future General Plan. The proposal runs counter the aim to "Grow the number of high-quality employment opportunities" which is a key component of achieving a "complete-community". This type of land is needed to attract employers, business and residents to Oro Valley. This proposal also conflicts with the Town Council-adopted 2017 Strategic Plan under the Economic Development Focus Area, which contains a goal stating, "A robust local economy and job market that provides opportunities for quality employment, build on Oro Valley's assets and encourage high-quality growth." Increasing employment opportunities and improving the local economy is a major emphasis of the General Plan. This proposal would noticeably reduce an already limited supply of land designated Commerce/Office Park. Oro Valley has only 2% of land designated for employment specific uses compared to Marana with 13%, Chandler with 15% and Carlsbad, CA with 6% as shown in Attachment 3. The project site is significant at 15 acres - as it is twice the size used by Securaplane Technologies. Furthermore, it is one of five sites with existing Campus Park Industrial zoning outside of Innovation Park. This scarcity and lack of competitors makes Oro Valley employment land less competitive relative to price and site choice. If approved, the proposal would also create proximity issues for future residents and commercial and employment developments as shown in Attachment 4. Additionally, the proposal has received mixed support from nearby residents. At the November 8, 2017 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, three residents offered public testimony on the proposal, with only one offering tentative support. Of the residents who have submitted written comments on this proposal, four of the five have been opposed to the land use change. Two public hearings were held with the Planning and Zoning Commission. Based on the aforementioned factors, the Commission recommended denial of the General Plan Amendment request. The Commission did note they would like to see the Economic Expansion Zone potentially expanded to include the subject property, which the Town Council did earlier this year. Town Council held a public hearing on December 6, 2017. Prior to the meeting, the applicant requested continuance and Town Council formally voted to do so. Since this action, the following new information is germane:  The applicant's non-binding illustration of a residential subdivision now represents 75 homes versus the original 64. The overall layout is essentially the same. The applicant submitted a revised justification for the proposed amendment (Attachment 2).  On March 21, 2018, Town Council voted to include this site among others within the Economic Expansion Zone.  Additional public comment has been received (Attachment 5).  The Town has received two pre-application requests to convert other Commerce/Office Park designated lands to residential use. Additional letters of opposition have been submitted.  The Town hired a Community and Economic Development Director who has created a plan designed to attract and expand new primary employment projects in Oro Valley. Based upon the initial analysis, an expansion of land zoned for employment is likely needed to successfully accommodate potential employers. BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: A. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND CONTEXT Land Use Context The existing General Plan land use designations for the property and the surrounding areas are provided in Attachment 2. The subject property is currently designated as Commerce/Office Park. Nearby land uses include Commerce/Office Park, Medium Density Residential and Neighborhood Commercial/Office. Site Conditions  15.23 acres Property is vacant Zoning is Campus Park Industrial (CPI) in the Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development. Typical uses are light industrial and office, with permitted uses including:  Communication studios Limited manufacturing Laboratories Printing Professional offices Technical services Warehousing Property History   June 1987: Rancho Vistoso Planned Area Development, Campus Park Industrial (CPI) Zoning 1997-2002: Approximately 74 acres of CPI zoning in the Rancho Vistoso PAD were approved for residential use 2004 - 2005: 24 acres within Innovation Park was platted for a residential subdivision. The Town condemned the land to prevent the new residential subdivision from locating adjacent to Ventana.  2008 - 2010: Development of "Innovation Commerce Campus" was planned on the project site, extensions were denied and the project approvals ultimately expired. December 2011: General Plan amendment request for High Density Residential denied by the Town Council B. PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT Applicant's Request The subject property is currently designated Commerce/Office Park (COP). The applicant is requesting an amendment to change the current designation to Medium Density Residential (MDR) land use designation, as described in Attachment 2. The applicant has provided a concept of the future development on the subject property. This is not tied to the application or action and serves only as an illustration for discussion purposes. If this application is approved, a subsequent rezoning will follow along with a required Tentative Development Plan. Type 1 General Plan Amendment Analysis The proposed amendment has been reviewed for conformance with the Your Voice, Our Future General Plan's amendment criteria, which includes consistency with the Vision, Guiding Principles, Goals and Policies. Staff finds that the proposed Type 1 General Plan Amendment to Medium Density Residential does not conform with the Your Voice Plan, as explained in the following analysis. Additional information can be found in the Planning and Zoning Commission staff reports, found in Attachments 6 and 7. Amendment Criteria 1. On balance, the request is consistent with the vision, guiding principles, goals and policies of the General Plan as demonstrated by adherence to all the following criteria. The Your Voice, Our Future General Plan places a significant emphasis on increasing and not just maintaining employment land. This is a core statement made in the high-level vision and guiding principles and then carried out in the goals, policies and actions. One of the guiding principles is particularly significant to review of this proposal (emphasis added):  Grow the number of high-quality employment opportunities   Health and medical research industries Educational institutions Research/technical parks Visitor and tourist attractions Light industry Professional office complexes Other, such as aerospace,engineering, and information technology companies. The Your Voice, Our Future General Plan also includes numerous goals and policies. In summary, the applicant's request does not conform with the intent of these goals regarding economic stability, the local economy and job market, targeted industries and the Town's economic base.  Additionally, Town staff has reviewed the subject property within the context of the larger Innovation Park area and the supply of employment land in the Town overall. Oro Valley's employment land is in short supply with far less designated than other similar communities. Oro Valley has only 2% of land (400 acres) designated for employment specific uses. For comparison purposes, Marana has 13% (10,000 acres), Chandler has 15% (6,000 acres) and Carlsbad, CA has 6% (1,400 acres) as shown in Attachment 3. Oro Valley has been successful at attracting employers, with almost half of Innovation Park either built or planned for development. An illustrative map is found in Attachment 3. Of the 12 projects built at Innovation Park since 2000, an average of 10 acres per project was absorbed. The new Community & Economic Development Director's similar experience in Colorado led to the attraction of 14 projects that produced an average of 152 jobs per project and absorbed more than 10 acres each. These projects were built and staffed in less than 10 years.  Using comparable criteria, Oro Valley has the potential to attract and expand 20-30 projects during the next 12 years. At 30 projects, the land absorption will exceed 300 acres with a projected primary job growth of roughly 4,500 by 2030.  That acreage is more than all of the current employment-zoned land available. Given Oro Valley's experience, one acre of land yields approximately 15 primary jobs.    The request shall not: a. Significantly alter existing development character and land use patterns without adequate and appropriate buffers and graduated transitions in density and land use. The subject property is located adjacent to Commerce/Office Park, Medium Density Residential and Neighborhood Commercial/Office as shown in Attachment 2. The property is located on a corner with the abutting single-family residential to the north. Although the proposed amendment would offer consistency with the residential properties, it would not offer a transition to other nearby uses. Converting this site to residential would create challenges for future residents and commercial land holders, as shown in Attachment 4. If developed as residential, more homeowners would then be impacted by commercial and light industrial uses compared to current conditions. Currently vacant commercial and light industrial properties along Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and Vistoso Commerce Loop would also have to contend with future residents when seeking to proceed with development. This proposal would not improve land use patterns in the area, it makes them more challenging. b. Impact existing uses with increased infrastructure without appropriate improvements to accommodate planned growth. There is existing infrastructure to support the proposed residential subdivision. Should the proposed amendment be approved, more detailed analysis will take place during the rezoning process. c. Impact other public services including police, fire, parks, water and drainage unless careful analysis and explanation of anticipated impacts is provided to the Town for review. There is sufficient public services and improvements to support the proposed residential development. Should the proposed amendment be approved, more detailed analysis will take place during the rezoning process. d. Impact the natural beauty and environmental resources without suitable mitigation. The proposed subdivision will be required to conform with all applicable zoning provisions related to plant mitigation, landscaping and environmental protection. 2. The applicant has implemented effective public outreach efforts to identify neighborhood concerns and has responded by incorporating measures to avoid or minimize development impacts to the extent reasonably possible, as well as to mitigate unavoidable adverse impacts. Two neighborhood meetings were held on April 27 and August 14, 2017, with approximately 30 residents at each meeting. The main topics discussed at the meetings included preserving the existing views to the east, building heights, and the overall site design. In response to the neighbors' concerns for view preservation, the applicant has expressed a willingness to limit building heights in certain areas of the site. Should the Town Council approve this amendment, staff would recommend a condition of approval be part of the future rezoning process. 3. All non-residential amendment requests will contribute positively to the long-term economic stability of the Town as demonstrated by consistency with goals and policies related to economic development and financial stability. This criteria is not applicable as the proposed amendment relates to a residential development. However, it is worth noting that retaining the current use on this property would benefit the long-term economic viability of the community more than adding a small development of homes.  Although it is commonly understood that rooftops are needed to support retail in the community, a review of national spending patterns has shown office workers typically spend a very similar amount locally per week as a resident. As proposed, homeowners in the proposed residential subdivision will spend slightly fewer dollars on retail than the anticipated number of employees on a 15 acre site.  C. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION The applicant's request was heard by the Planning and Zoning Commission at two public hearings held on October 3 and November 8, 2017. Minutes from the second Commission meeting can be found in Attachment 8. At the conclusion of the second meeting, the Commission recommended denial of the request based on the following factors:  The proposal is not in conformance with the intent of the Your Voice, Our Future General Plan and its focus on improving the local economy. The proposal would significantly reduce an already limited supply of Commerce/Office Park land in Oro Valley. This type of land is needed to attract employers, businesses and residents to Oro Valley and help maintain the community's long-term economic viability. Choices in this type of land use are essential for attracting employers.  Although the proposal would be compatible with the adjacent residential properties, it would create proximity issues for future residents and commercial and employment developments. It could also potentially impact the Economic Expansion Zone. A medium-density residential development on 15 acres would not help with the long-term economic viability in the community as much as retaining light industrial uses which could potentially bring more quality employment to Oro Valley. D. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION The following public notice has been provided:  Notification of all property owners within 1,000 feet Notification to additional interested parties who signed in at neighborhood meetings Homeowners association mailing Advertisement in The Daily Territorial and Arizona Daily Star newspapers Advertisement in the Explorer newspaper Post on property Post at Town Hall and on Town website Outside review agencies Two neighborhood meetings were held on April 27 and August 14, 2017, with approximately 30 residents at each meeting. Neighborhood meeting summaries and letters of concern are included with the Planning and Zoning Commission materials found in Attachments 7 and 8. New comments provided since re-advertising this public hearing are included in Attachment 5.  E. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends denial of the request. Staff concurs with the Commission's unanimous findings. FISCAL IMPACT: No immediate fiscal impact is anticipated from this General Plan Amendment request. SUGGESTED MOTION: The Town Council may wish to consider the following suggested motions for the proposed General Plan Amendment: I MOVE to DENY the Innovation Park General Plan Amendment request from Commerce/Office Park to Medium Density Residential, based on the finding that the application is not in conformance with the amendment criteria and intent of the Your Voice, Our Future General Plan. OR I MOVE to APPROVE Resolution No. (R)18-36, for the Innovation Park General Plan Amendment amending the designated land use from Commerce/Office Park to Medium Density Residential.   Attachments (R)18-36 Innovation GPA  2 Applicant Narrative  3_Available Employment Land  4_Future Proximity Issues  5_Recent Public Comment  6_PZC October 3 Materials  7_PZC November 8 Materials  8_PZC November 8 Minutes  Attachment 11 Rezoning Conditions of Approval Vistoso Commerce Loop PAD Amendment Planning 1. The building height of homes in the future subdivision may not exceed one story, or eighteen (18) feet. 2. Lot 27 on the Tentative Development Plan, as depicted in Exhibit “A”, must have the east lot line adjusted as needed to not impact dense vegetation at the abutting drainage. 3. The proposed subdivision and any future residential development on the parcel may not exceed 5 homes per acre, the maximum allowed under the Medium Density Residential General Plan designation. Engineering 4. Vistoso Commerce Loop shall be re-striped to include a center two-way left turn lane, bikes lanes, and one through lane in each direction, from Rancho Vistoso Blvd to Oracle Rd. In addition, the corresponding pavement marking obliteration and related surface treatment shall be subject to Town Engineering requirements. Vistoso Commerce Loop improvements shall be completed prior to any permits being finaled for the subject property. Exhibit “A”    Town Council Regular Session 2. Meeting Date:01/09/2019   Requested by: Bayer Vella, Community and Economic Development  Submitted By:Patty Hayes, Community and Economic Development Case Number: OV1801490 Information SUBJECT: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING A MASTER SIGN PROGRAM FOR THE PLACITA DE ORO SHOPPING CENTER LOCATED AT 11901 N. FIRST AVENUE RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the request. A draft of the meeting minutes and the staff report are included in Attachment 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The property owner proposes a new master sign program for the Placita de Oro shopping center that will establish an updated set of standards for perm anent signs in the development (Attachment 2). The proposed master sign program will replace the current sign criteria which will include the following changes:  An updated monument sign design Allow a monument sign height of 12' A master sign program is a set of customized sign standards that allows latitude to the zoning code in order to achieve variety and good design. The proposed latitude in this case is to allow the monument signs to be as tall as 12' which is 2' taller than signs allowed through the sign criteria process. The applicant proposes the taller signs in order to provide better visibility and identification for the tenants in the development. Placita de Oro is located in an area with a deeper than usual right-of-way and dense perimeter landscaping near a high speed intersection, all of which make visibility for this shopping center challenging. This is the reason the new sign standards, with a taller sign, were submitted as a master sign program which required review by the Planning and Zoning Commission with final approval by Town Council. The proposed sign standards will incorporate design elements, such as color and stone veneer, that will provide unity between the proposed signs and the buildings on site. BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: The Placita de Oro shopping center was developed in 2006 and contains a hardware and drug store along with a The Placita de Oro shopping center was developed in 2006 and contains a hardware and drug store along with a bank, restaurant and service-related businesses.  There is a previously established sign criteria for the shopping center which allows store owners to use a variety of colors for wall signs. Those standards will continue with the proposed master sign program; however, the monument sign design, if approved, will change to allow taller signs with clearer tenant identification. The new sign design, in conjunction with the taller height will mitigate visibility for the shopping center and allow tenants to be more noticed therefore attracting more customers to the site. Existing Site Conditions  11 acre site Zoned C2 (Regional Commercial) 8 building pads; one pad is vacant Master Sign Program Details Monument signs Monument signs are permanent structures placed near the entryways of a development that identify the shopping center and also the tenants in the buildings. The primary focus of the proposed sign program is the monument sign design and height. The quantity and location of the signs will comply with the zoning code standards. The proposed new design will allow up to eight (8) tenant panels on signs that are 12' tall., which is 2' taller than the height generally allowed by the zoning code and is the main reason why the applicant submitted a master sign program. The taller monument signs are proposed due to the location challenges for this shopping center which include the wide curved Tangerine Road right-of-way and dense perimeter vegetation. The quantity and location of the signs will meet the standards allowed in the zoning code. Wall signs Wall signs are individual letters and/or logos attached to the exterior wall of the tenant space that provide identification for the business. The proposed sign program will allow both pan channel and reverse pan channel letters with halo or internal illumination. The proposed illumination, quantity and sizes of the wall signs meet the Oro Valley zoning code standards. The applicant has chosen to prohibit any wall signs on the building elevations that face the nearby residential homes in order to protect the view of those properties.  Discussion/Analysis: Design Standards and Design Principals are below in italics followed by staff commentary: Sign colors, design and placement shall be complementary and integral to the projects architectural and site design themes. The proposed monument signs will be placed in locations that are allowed by the zoning code once the existing signs on the site are removed. The proposed monument sign design utilizes earth tone colors found in the shopping center along with a stone veneer base that also blends with the stone accents in the development (Attachment 3).  Project identification and sign elements shall incorporate architectural treatment and project unifying elements which are integrated with the overall design of the project in terms of style, materials, color and theme . The proposed signs introduce a new design for the development but continues the use of colors and materials used within the shopping center. The new design will blend with the development while providing effective identification for the tenants. As feasible, sign colors shall utilize the project color palette approved as part of the Conceptual Design for the project. The earth tones and teal accent colors found within the development will be used in the design of the new monument signs while allowing individual businesses to use colors from the proposed color palette or registered logos. General Plan The proposed sign criteria was reviewed for conformance with the General Plan’s Goals and Policies. Listed below are relevant policies within the General Plan relating to signage: Goal Q: A built environment that creatively integrates landscape, architecture, open space and conservation elements to increase the sense of place, community interaction and quality of life. Policy Land Use 6: Maintain the small town, neighborly character and improve the design and safety of the built environment. Action item #125: Maintain the unique character of Oro Valley by studying and updating: Signage regulations to emphasize identification and direction over advertising goods or services to maintain compatibility and minimal intrusiveness. The proposed master sign program will provide an updated and taller monument sign design which will allow businesses to be better identified to the public while maintaining cohesive non-intrusive signage.   Planning and Zoning Commission The Planning and Zoning Commission voted to recommend approval of the master sign program. The staff report and draft meeting minutes are included as Attachment 1. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to (APPROVE/DENY) the master sign program for the Placita De Oro shopping center as shown in Attachment 2.   Attachments Attachment 1 PZC Draft Meeting Minutes and Staff Report  Attachment 2 Master Sign Program  Attachment 3 Site Photos  December 4, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission 1 MINUTES ORO VALLEY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR SESSION December 4, 2018 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CAÑADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER Chair Hurt called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Charlie Hurt, Chair Bob Swope, Vice Chair Greg Hitt, Commissioner Thomas Gribb, Commissioner Don Cox, Commissioner Nathan Basken, Commissioner ABSENT: Tom Drzazgowski, Commissioner ALSO PRESENT: Principal Planner Michael Spaeth Chief Civil Deputy Attorney Joe Andrews Town Council Liaison Bill Rodman PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Chair Hurt led the Commission and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. CALL TO AUDIENCE There were no speaker requests. COUNCIL LIAISON COMMENTS Council Liaison Bill Rodman spoke about an upcoming series of strategic planning meetings and encouraged the Commission to look for opportunities for input. He also spoke about the upcoming Council meeting, which includes an item on eliminating third term options for Board and Commission members. REGULAR SESSION AGENDA December 4, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission 2 1. REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE NOVEMBER 8, 2018 SPECIAL SESSION MEETING MINUTES MOTION: A motion was made by Commissioner Cox and seconded by Vice Chair Swope to approve the November 8, 2018 meeting minutes as written. MOTION carried, 6-0. 2. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON A REQUEST FOR CONCEPTUAL MODEL HOME ARCHITECTURE FOR A NEW RANCHO VISTOSO SUBDIVISION LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD AND VISTOSO HIGHLANDS DRIVE, OV1700899 Planner Hannah Oden provided a presentation that included the following: - Purpose - Location - Site Plan - Plans T28J and T31H - Side Elevations - Rear Elevations - Plans T29H and T40R - Surrounding Development - Summary and Recommendation Rick Morris, representing Richmond American Homes, reviewed the proposed model homes and lots that will be used for their locations. Discussion ensued among the Commission, applicant and staff. MOTION: A motion was made by Commissioner Hitt and seconded by Commissioner Gribb to approve the Conceptual Model Home Architecture for the proposed four (4) model homes for a new Rancho Vistoso subdivision, subject to the conditions in Attachment 2, based on the findings that the request complies with the Design Principles and Design Standards of the Zoning Code. Further discussion continued among the Commission. MOTION carried, 6-0. 3. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON A REQUEST FOR CONCEPTUAL MODEL HOME ARCHITECTURE FOR A NEW RANCHO VISTOSO SUBDIVISION LOCATED EAST OF RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD AT THE FUTURE MOORE ROAD LOOP EXTENSION, OV1802566 December 4, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission 3 Planner Hannah Oden provided a presentation that included the following: - Purpose - Location - Plans 4020-8 and 5022-8 - Side Elevations - Rear Elevations - Plans 4022-8 and 5024-8 - Surrounding Development - Summary and Recommendation Applicant Dustin Moyer, representing Pulte Homes, stated they have worked hard to comply with the Town's planning standards and are excited to be in the neighborhood. Discussion ensued among Commission, staff and applicant. MOTION: A motion was made by Commissioner Cox and seconded by Commissioner Basken to approve the Conceptual Model Home Architecture for the proposed seven (7) model homes for a new Rancho Vistoso subdivision, subject to the conditions in Attachment 2, based on the findings that the request complies with the Design Principles and Design Standards of the Zoning Code. Further discussion continued among the Commission. Vice Chair Swope stated he will abstain from voting as he is not in support of this project’s location. MOTION carried, 5-0. with Bob Swope, Vice Chair abstained. 4. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING A MASTER SIGN PROGRAM FOR THE PLACITA DE ORO SHOPPING CENTER LOCATED AT 11901 N. FIRST AVENUE, OV1801490 Senior Planning Technician Patty Hayes provided a presentation that included the following: - Purpose - Location - Master Sign Program - Colors - Wall Signs and Illumination - General Plan - Summary Applicant Chris Hinkson, owner of the shopping center, spoke about the shopping center being set back far from the street and the sign will help with tenant visibility. Discussion ensued among staff and the Commission. December 4, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission 4 MOTION: A motion was made by Commissioner Hitt and seconded by Commissioner Cox to approve the master sign program for the Placita De Oro shopping center, case OV1801490, based on the finding that the proposed sign program is consistent with the Design Principles. MOTION carried, 6-0. PLANNING UPDATE (INFORMATIONAL ONLY) Principal Planner Michael Spaeth provided the following updates: - December 11 will be the fourth and final State Land focus group meeting - Interviews will be conducted for new Commissioner applications this month; Council will formally appoint on January 9 - The January Commission meeting will be rescheduled to Thursday, January 10 - Thanked the outgoing Commissioners for their service and dedication FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Commissioner Cox spoke about the importance of annexations for Oro Valley being paramount to the viability of the Town and the community. He would like staff to schedule a joint study session with the Town Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission to discuss/educate on the importance. ADJOURNMENT Chair Hurt adjourned the meeting at 6:54 p.m. Prepared by: Jeanna Ancona Senior Office Specialist I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the regular session Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of Oro Valley, Arizona held on the 4th day of December, 2018. I further certify that the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present. Planning & Zoning Commission AGENDA ITEM: 4. Meeting Date:12/04/2018 Requested by: Bayer Vella, Community and Economic Development Case Number: OV1801490 SUBJECT: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING A MASTER SIGN PROGRAM FOR THE PLACITA DE ORO SHOPPING CENTER LOCATED AT 11901 N. FIRST AVENUE, OV1801490 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the request. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The property owner proposes a new master sign program for the Placita De Oro shopping center that will establish an updated set of standards for permanent signs in the development (Attachment 1). The proposed master sign program will replace the current sign criteria which will include the following changes: • An updated monument sign design • Allow a monument sign height of 12' A master sign program is a set of customized sign standards that allows latitude to the zoning code in order to achieve variety and good design. The proposed latitude in this case is to allow the monument signs to be as tall as 12' which is 2' taller than signs allowed through the sign criteria process. The applicant proposes the taller signs in order to provide better visibility and identification for the tenants in the development. Placita De Oro is located in an area with a deeper than usual right-of-way and dense perimeter landscaping near a high speed intersection, all of which make visibility for this shopping center challenging. This is the reason the new sign standards, with a taller sign, were submitted as a master sign program which requires recommendation by the Commission and approval by Council. Page 1 of 4Print Staff Report 12/13/2018https://destinyhosted.com/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=2704&rev_num=0&mode=External... The proposed sign standards will incorporate design elements, such as color and stone veneer, that will provide unity between the proposed signs and the buildings on site. BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: The Placita De Oro shopping center was developed in 2006 and contains a hardware and drug store along with a bank, restaurant and service related businesses (Attachment 2). There is a previously established sign criteria which allows store owners to use a variety of colors for wall signs. Those standards will continue with the proposed master sign program, however, the monument sign design, if approved, will change to allow taller signs with clearer tenant identification. The new sign design, in conjunction with the taller height will mitigate visibility for the shopping center and allow tenants to be more noticed therefore attract more customers to the site. Existing Site Conditions • 11 acre site • Zoned C2 • 8 building pads. One pad is vacant. Master Sign Program Details Monument signs Monument signs are permanent structures placed near the entryways of a development that identify the shopping center and also the tenants in the buildings. The primary focus of the proposed sign program is the monument sign design and height. The quantity and location of the signs will comply with the zoning code standards. The proposed new design will allow up to eight (8) tenant panels on signs that are 12' tall. That is 2' taller than the height generally allowed by the zoning code which is why the applicant is submitting a master sign program for recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission and final approval by Council. The taller monument signs are proposed due to the location challenges for this shopping center which include the wide curved Tangerine Road right-of-way and dense perimeter vegetation. Wall signs Wall signs are individual letters and/or logos attached to the exterior wall of the tenant space that provide identification for the business. The proposed sign program will allow both pan channel and reverse pan channel letters with halo or internal illumination. The illumination, quantity and sizes of the wall signs will meet the Oro Valley zoning code standards. The applicant has chosen to prohibit any wall signs on the building elevations that face the nearby residential homes in order to protect the view of those properties. Discussion/Analysis: Design Standards and Design Principals are below in italics followed by staff commentary: Sign colors, design and placement shall be complementary and integral to the projects architectural and site design themes. The proposed monument signs will be placed in locations that are allowed by the zoning code once Page 2 of 4Print Staff Report 12/13/2018https://destinyhosted.com/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=2704&rev_num=0&mode=External... the existing signs on the site are removed. The proposed monument sign design utilizes earth tone colors found in the shopping center along with a stone veneer base that also blends with the stone accents in the development (Attachment 2). Project identification and sign elements shall incorporate architectural treatment and project unifying elements which are integrated with the overall design of the project in terms of style, materials, color and theme. The proposed signs introduce a new design for the development but continues the use of colors and materials used within the shopping center. The new design will blend with the development while providing effective identification for the tenants. As feasible, sign colors shall utilize the project color palette approved as part of the Conceptual Design for the project. The earth tones and teal accent colors found within the development will be used in the design of the new monument signs while allowing individual businesses to use colors from the proposed color palette or registered logos. General Plan The proposed sign criteria was reviewed for conformance with the General Plan’s Goals and Policies. Listed below are relevant policies within the General Plan relating to signage: Goal Q: A built environment that creatively integrates landscape, architecture, open space and conservation elements to increase the sense of place, community interaction and quality of life. Policy Land Use 6: Maintain the small town, neighborly character and improve the design and safety of the built environment. Action item #125: Maintain the unique character of Oro Valley by studying and updating: Signage regulations to emphasize identification and direction over advertising goods or services to maintain compatibility and minimal intrusiveness. The proposed master sign program will provide an updated and taller monument sign design which will allow businesses to be better identified to the public while maintaining cohesive non-intrusive signage. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to recommend approval of the master sign program for the Placita De Oro shopping center, case OV1801490, based on the finding that the proposed sign program is consistent with the Design Principles. OR I MOVE to recommend denial of the master sign program for the Placita De Oro shopping center, case OV1801490, based on the finding that __________________. Page 3 of 4Print Staff Report 12/13/2018https://destinyhosted.com/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=2704&rev_num=0&mode=External... Attachments Attachment 1 Master Sign Program Attachment 2 Site Photos Page 4 of 4Print Staff Report 12/13/2018https://destinyhosted.com/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=2704&rev_num=0&mode=External... NATIONWIDE SIGN SYSTEMS © COPYRIGHT 2018 - PLACITA DE ORO [CSP] 04-23-18 R7 DESIGN COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PROGRAM OF 5 SIGNAGE MANAGEMENT ARIZONA COMMERCIAL SIGNS 4018 EAST WINSLOW AVENUE | PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85040 P: 480.921.9900 | F: 602.437.8073 | arizonacommercialsigns.com THE HINKSON COMPANY, L.L.C. 5050 NORTH 40TH STREET| SUITE 350 | PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85018 P: 480.794.1887 | F: 888.806.4268 | hinksoncompany.com PLACITA DE ORO 11901-11941 NORTH 1ST AVENUE ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA 85737 1 NATIONWIDE SIGN SYSTEMS © COPYRIGHT 2018 - PLACITA DE ORO [CSP] 04-23-18 R7 DESIGN COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PROGRAM OF 5 SIGNAGE MANAGEMENT ARIZONA COMMERCIAL SIGNS 4018 EAST WINSLOW AVENUE | PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85040 P: 480.921.9900 | F: 602.437.8073 | arizonacommercialsigns.com THE HINKSON COMPANY, L.L.C. 5050 NORTH 40TH STREET| SUITE 350 | PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85018 P: 480.794.1887 | F: 888.806.4268 | hinksoncompany.com PLACITA DE ORO 11901-11941 NORTH 1ST AVENUE ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA 85737 2 SITE PLAN SCALE: 1” = 100’- 0” PROPERTY LINE Monument signs will be placed in accordance with Oro Valley Zoning Code standards NATIONWIDE SIGN SYSTEMS © COPYRIGHT 2018 - PLACITA DE ORO [CSP] 04-23-18 R7 DESIGN COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PROGRAM OF 5 SIGNAGE MANAGEMENT ARIZONA COMMERCIAL SIGNS 4018 EAST WINSLOW AVENUE | PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85040 P: 480.921.9900 | F: 602.437.8073 | arizonacommercialsigns.com THE HINKSON COMPANY, L.L.C. 5050 NORTH 40TH STREET| SUITE 350 | PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85018 P: 480.794.1887 | F: 888.806.4268 | hinksoncompany.com PLACITA DE ORO 11901-11941 NORTH 1ST AVENUE ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA 85737 This criteria has been developed to ensure that sign colors, design and placement shall be complementary and integral to the project ’s architectural and site design themes ITenant signage has been designed to enhance the character of the center. The Tenant shall gain approval from both the landlord and the Town prior to installation, to ensure compatibility with the architectural design and colors of the center. The addition of new multi-tenant monument signs will increase the visibility and exposure of tenant names, since most tenants are not visible from the right-of-way. Sign permits must be obtained from the town of Oro Valley. TENANT STOREFRONT SIGNAGE CRITERIA 1. Type of signage: Illuminated Pan Channel Letters, or Reverse Pan-Channel Letters mounted 1.5” off building fascia, depth no greater than 8”. 2. Letter face colors to be bronze, black, red, white, orange, blue, green, yellow, patina. Registered trademarks and logos are allowed. 3. Return colors to match faces. 4. Logos may be 35% of total allowed sign area. 5. Maximum Letter Height: Leased area up to 2,000 s.f.: 24”. Leased area 2,001-6,000 s.f.: 36” Leased area 6,001 - 12,000 s.f.: 48” Leased area 12,000+ s.f.: 72” 6. All electrical signs shall conform to National Electrical Code Standards and Uniform Building Code Standards. . 7. All sign bolts, fastenings, sleeves, and clips shall be of hot dipped galvanized iron, stainless steel, aluminum, brass, or bronze and no black iron material of any type will be permitted. 8. No labels shall be permitted on the exposed surface of signs, except those required by local ordinance. Those required shall be applied in an inconspicuous location. 9. Any penetrations of the building structure required for sign installation shall be neatly sealed in a watertight condition. 10. All exposed metals shall be painted to render them inconspicuous. 11. No exposed tubing, conduit, or raceways will be permitted. All conductor, transformers, and other equipment shall be concealed. 12. All electrical signs shall bear the UL Label and be mounted on top of letters. 13. Door and window graphics shall conform to the standards of the Oro Valley Zoning Code. 14. Wall sign size and quantity for all tenants will follow Oro Valley Zoning Code standards. No sign to exceed 80% of store leased front. Maximum sign area to be no greater than one hundred fty (150) square feet. Elevations further than three hundred (300) feet from Right-of Way may have no more than one and one-half 1.5 square feet not to exceed a maximum of two hundred (200) square feet. 15. Letter style and color shall be subject to approval by the Landlord. 16. No wall signs will be allowed on the West or South side that faces adjacent residential properties. FREESTANDING SIGNS CRITERIA The design of all monument signs and panels are subject to review and approval by landlord. All freestanding signs shall be”monument ” style and must be compatible with the architecture of center. 1. Monument sign locations and quantity will follow Oro Valley Zoning Code standards 2. Signs shall be located in such a manner which will not present any trafc hazards. 3. The maximum sign area for each sign is 72 square feet. 4. The maximum height of each sign is ten (10) feet above grade with two (2) foot architectural element at the top of the sign. 3 NATIONWIDE SIGN SYSTEMS © COPYRIGHT 2018 - PLACITA DE ORO [CSP] 04-23-18 R7 DESIGN COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PROGRAM OF 5 SIGNAGE MANAGEMENT ARIZONA COMMERCIAL SIGNS 4018 EAST WINSLOW AVENUE | PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85040 P: 480.921.9900 | F: 602.437.8073 | arizonacommercialsigns.com THE HINKSON COMPANY, L.L.C. 5050 NORTH 40TH STREET| SUITE 350 | PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85018 P: 480.794.1887 | F: 888.806.4268 | hinksoncompany.com PLACITA DE ORO 11901-11941 NORTH 1ST AVENUE ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA 85737 DARK BRONZE Matthews® Paint MP1079 | LRV 10.1 SATIN FINISH Pantone® Black 7 C BLACK Matthews® Paint MP10439 | LRV 4.2 SATIN FINISH Pantone® Hex Black C RED Matthews® Paint MP643 | LRV XX.X SATIN FINISH Pantone® 485 C WHITE Matthews® Paint MP366 | LRV 88.5 SATIN FINISH Pantone® Trans. White ORANGE Matthews® Paint MP169 | LRV XX.X SATIN FINISH Pantone® 151 C BLUE Matthews® Paint MP366 | LRV XX.X SATIN FINISH Pantone® 300 C GREEN Matthews® Paint MP441 | LRV XX.X SATIN FINISH Pantone® 340 C YELLOW Matthews® Paint MP127 | LRV XX.X SATIN FINISH Pantone® 116 C PATINA Matthews® Paint TO MATCH ONSITE EXISTING FINISHES NOTE: CORPORATE BRANDED COLORS WILL BE ALLOWED IN COMPLEX. ALL COLOR OPTION(S) TO BE DETERMINED AND APPROVED BY LANDLORD AND PERMITTING CITY. ANY AND ALL COLOR VARIATIONS WILL BE DETERMINED AND REVIEWED BY LANDLORD AND PERMITTING CITY ON A CASE BY CASE BASIS. ALL COMPLEX SIGNAGE IS TO BE PAINTED WITH A SATIN LOW GLARE FINISH AS NOT TO DETER FROM MOTORISTS DRIVING IN AND AROUND THE COMPLEX. PATINA FINISHING MUST MATCH TONALITY AND COLORATION OF ALL EXISTING ONSITE PATINA PROCESSED COPY. 4 signage colors NATIONWIDE SIGN SYSTEMS © COPYRIGHT 2018 - PLACITA DE ORO [CSP] 04-23-18 R7 DESIGN COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PROGRAM OF 5 SIGNAGE MANAGEMENT ARIZONA COMMERCIAL SIGNS 4018 EAST WINSLOW AVENUE | PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85040 P: 480.921.9900 | F: 602.437.8073 | arizonacommercialsigns.com THE HINKSON COMPANY, L.L.C. 5050 NORTH 40TH STREET| SUITE 350 | PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85018 P: 480.794.1887 | F: 888.806.4268 | hinksoncompany.com PLACITA DE ORO 11901-11941 NORTH 1ST AVENUE ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA 85737 5 9’-11” 9’-4”6”PERMITTING: 7’-7”1’-8 1/2”1’-6”1’-4”11’-2 1/2”PERMITTING: 9’-5”1’-8” 1’-0”4’-7” REVEALS 1 2 3 4 4 5 6 Bath & Body Works® PERMITTING: 71.41 SF D/F INTERNALLY-ILLUMINATED TENANT ID MONUMENT(S) [MAJOR] SCALE: 1/2”=1’- 0” Scope of Work Manufacture and install D/F internally illuminated tenant ID monument(s). Tenant panel(s) are 2” deep. Property ID Panel is routed and backed with white acrylic. “Placita De Oro” copy is inset 3m Black copy. Colors Used Rust Brown PMS 483C to match site colors Teal Green PMS 322C to match site colors Black Anodic MP 5241 Pantone SPECIFICATION NOTES ALUMINUM TOP CAP IS PAINTED PMS 483C RUST BROWN, LIGHT TEXTURE. ALUMINUM MAIN CABINET IS PAINTED PMS 322 TEAL GREEN. STREET SIDE OF CABINET IS ROUTED OUT WITH BACK- UP ACRYLIC AND 7725-22 MATTE BLACK VINYL OVERLAY. ILLUMINATE WITH WHITE L.E.D.S. 2” DEEP TENANT PANELS ARE PAINTED MP 5241 PANTONE, ROUTED OUT WITH WHITE BACK-UP ACRYLIC AND TRANSLUCENT VINYL OVERLAYS. REVEALS ARE PAINTED BLACK, NO TEXTURE. BASE HAS CULTURED STONE TO MATCH EXISTING. 6” ADDRESS NUMBERS ARE FCO WHITE ACRYLIC. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Placita De Oro Shopping Center Site Photos (OV1801490) Attachment 3 40’ ROW Hardy Road First AveCurrent sign design to be replaced with proposed design    Town Council Regular Session 3. Meeting Date:01/09/2019   Requested by: Stacey Lemos Submitted By:Stacey Lemos, Finance Department:Finance Information SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. (R)19-01, ESTABLISHING A BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMISSION AND ESTABLISHING THE TASKING AND OPERATIONS OF SAID COMMISSION BY ADOPTING THE DOCUMENT KNOWN AS THE "OPERATING PROCEDURES ORO VALLEY BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMISSION" AND MAKING SUCH A DOCUMENT A PUBLIC RECORD (THE RESOLUTION AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS WILL BE UPLOADED ONCE FINALIZED) (RESOLUTION AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS ADDED 1/3/19 @ 4:45 PM) RECOMMENDATION: For Council consideration and action. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This item is placed on the agenda at the request of Mayor Winfield and Councilmember Jones-Ivey to establish a citizen-based Budget and Finance Commission in order to provide the elected body with external citizen advice and evaluation of key issues related to the financial operation of the Town of Oro Valley. BACKGROUND OR DETAILED INFORMATION: The Town Council had previously established a five-member citizen-based Budget and Bond Committee, later renamed 'Finance and Bond Committee,' back in 1999 to review and provide recommendations to Council on various finance, audit and budget-related issues. This Committee was dissolved by the Town Council in 2010 with the consideration that in lieu of a standing committee, separate ad hoc, citizen-based task force(s) could be formed as needed in the future to evaluate budget and finance-related topics and provide recommendations to the Town Council. This agenda item proposes the formation of a citizen-based Budget and Finance Commission with responsibilities and tasks consistent with those of the former Finance and Bond Committee to include reviewing and providing recommendations on the Town Manager's annual Recommended Budget and 10-Year Capital Improvement Plan, the annual 5-year financial forecast, the Town's annual financial audit and assisting in the selection of the Town's independent audit firm. The proposed scope of the Commission, as outlined in the attached Operating Procedures, also includes the opportunity for the Commission to study and make recommendations to Town Council on other topic-specific items as requested by the Council or the Town Manager. Additional detail about the operating procedures and tasking of the Budget and Finance Commission is included in the attachment to this Council communication. FISCAL IMPACT: There is an estimated annual fiscal impact of approximately $1,000/year for support staff and ancillary expenses. SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to approve/deny Resolution No. (R)19-01, establishing a Budget and Finance Commission and establishing I MOVE to approve/deny Resolution No. (R)19-01, establishing a Budget and Finance Commission and establishing the tasking and operations of said Commission by adopting the document known as the "Operating Procedures Oro Valley Budget and Finance Commission." Attachments (R)19-01 Budget and Finance Commission  RESOLUTION NO. (R)19-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL ESTABLISHING A BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMISSION , AND ESTABLISHING THE TASKING AND OPERATIONS OF SAID COMMISSION BY ADOPTING THE DOCUMENT KNOWN AS THE “OPERATING PROCEDURES ORO VALLEY BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMISSION ” AND MAKING SUCH DOCUMENT A PUBLIC RECORD; AND DIRECTING THE TOWN MANAGER, TOWN CLERK, TOWN LEGAL SERVICES DIRECTOR, OR THEIR DULY AUTHORIZED OFFICERS AND AGENTS TO TAKE ALL STEPS NECESSARY TO CARRY OUT T HE PURPOSES AND INTENT OF THIS RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council desire to establish a Budget and Finance Commission in order to provide the elected body with external citizen advice and evaluation of key issues related to the financial operation of the Town of Oro Valley; and WHEREAS , the Budget and Finance Commission will consist of qualified individuals preferably with a background in financial management selected by the Mayor and Council after an external recruitment of interested residents; and WHEREAS , the Town Council has identified areas in which the Budget and Commission could be of particular benefit to the elected body in the conduct of its official policy responsibilities relating to the short and long -term financial health of the organization by adopting the attached Operating Procedures for the Budget and Finance Commission; and WHEREAS , The Town Council desires to provide for staggered terms in the future for this new Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona as follows: Section 1. That the Town Council hereby establishes the Oro Valley Budget and Finance Commission and specifies the advisory responsibilities of said commission by adopting that certain document known as the “Operating Procedures Oro Valley Budget and Finance Commission,” attached as Exhibit “A ,” attached hereto and declared a public record . Section 2. That initial interviews and recommendations to the Town Council of Budget and Finance Commission members shall be conducted by the Mayor and two Councilmembers of the Mayor’s choosing. Subsequent Commission members shall be selected following the process specified in the Town Council’s Parliamentary Rules and Procedures. Section 3. That two of the five members of the Budget and Finance Commission shall be ass igned one-year initial calendar year terms established by lot drawn by the Mayor in order to provide for staggered terms after the commission’s first year. Section 4. That the Town Manager, Town Clerk, Town Legal Services Director, or their duly authorize d officers and agents are hereby authorized and directed to take all steps necessary to carry out the purposes and intent of this resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, this 9th day of January, 2019. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ________________________________ Joseph C. Winfield, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Michael Standish, Town Clerk Tobin Sidles, Legal Services Director Date: Date: EXHIBIT “A” OPERATING PROCEDURES ORO VALLEY BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMISSION BE IT DIRECTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley that the Operating Procedures of the Budget and Finance Commission shall be as follows: MEMBERSHIP The Budget and Finance Commission shall be composed of five members who shall be residents of the Town. All members of the Commission should have a background or experience in accounting, finance, banking, investments or other related business administration area. The members of the Budget and Finance Commission shall be appointed by the Town Counci l. Appointments shall be for a period of two years, with terms of members so staggered that the terms of no more than three members shall expire in any one year. Upon initial formation, two of the five appointments shall be for a period of one year in ord er to allow for staggered terms thereafter. Vacancies for any reason shall be filled by appointment by the Council for the remainder of the unexpired term. The term of all members shall extend until their successors are appointed. If a member misses three consecutive regular meetings, a letter of inquiry requesting a response shall be sent by the Town Clerk. If the response received is indicative of a continuation of frequent absences, the Budget and Finance Commission may request by a majority vote that the Town Council appoint a new person to complete the term. OFFICERS The Budget and Finance Commission shall elect a Chair and Vice -Chair from among its own members in February of each year who shall serve for a period of one year. The Chair shall pre side at all meetings and exercise all the usual rights, duties and prerogatives of the head of any similar advisory body. The Vice-Chair shall perform the duties of the Chair in the absence or disability of the Chair. If both Chair and Vice-Chair are absent from a meeting, the senior member of the Committee shall preside. Vacancies in officer positions created by any cause shall be filled for the unexpired term by a new election at the next available meeting of the Commission. MEETINGS Regular meetings of the Budget and Finance Commission shall be held at the Oro Valley Town Hall on at least a quarterly basis, but can be held more frequently as determined by the Commission, at such day and time as is determined by the advisory body. Such meetings shall be duly noticed in accordance with Arizona Revised Statutes. If a quorum (three members) is not present at a regular or special meeting, such meeting will be continued to a specific day and time, or the Commission’s next regular meeting. SCOPE The Budget and Finance Commission advises the Town Council on policy- related issues associated with the elected body’s financial/fiduciary responsibilities, including review of the Town Manager’s Recommended Budget, review of the Town’s annual financial audit, and evaluation of other financial policy matters as may be tasked from time to time. The Commission may assist in the selection of the Town’s independent auditor in accordance with Town procurement policies, and may also study and make recommendations to Town Council on topic-specific items as periodically requested by resolution of the Town Council or by written request of the Town Manager. POWERS AND DUTIES The Budget and Finance Commission performs the following regular duties: A. Review of the Town Manager’s Recommended Budget and 10 -Year Capital Improvement Plan On an annual basis, the Town Manager is required by ordinance to submit a recommended budget and capital plan for the fiscal year to the Town Council for consideration and final approval. Members of the Budget and Finance Commission shall be provided with a copy of the Town Manager’s Recommended Budget and Capital Improvement Plan when said document is delivered to the Town Council, and shall review and submit any recommendations to the Council. B. Town’s Annual Financial Audit On an annual basis, the Budget and Finance Commission shall be presented the results of the Town’s financial audit performed by an independent certified public accounting firm. The Commission may make a recommendation to the Council with respect to Council acceptance of the audit. The Town Manager shall offer the Budget and Finance Commission an appropriate role in the selection of the Town’s independent audit firm when these services go out to bid by the Town, all in conformance with the Town’s procurement policies. C. Review Annual 5 -Year Financial Forecast As part of the annual Town budget preparation cycle, the Town Council’s financial policies stipulate that the Town Manager is responsible for preparing and presenting a minimum five-year financial forecast of projected revenues and expenditures. The Budget and Finance Commission shall be provided with a copy of the annual forecast at such time as the document is provided to the Town Council, and shall review and submit any comments and recommendations to the Town Council. OTHER TASKINGS The Budget and Finance Commission may also study and make recommendations to the Town Council on topic-specific items as requested from time to time by resolution of the Mayor and Council or by written request of the Town Manager. AMENDMENTS The Town Council may amend these rules by resolution at any time. The Budget and Finance Commission may also present recommended amendments to the Town Council for consideration. ALL OTHER PROCEDURES The Budget and Finance Commission shall follow all other Town policies and responsibilities as established by the Town Council, Town Code or Arizona Revised Statues related to advisory bodies duly established by the Oro Valley Town Council.