Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPackets - Council Packets (1011) AGENDA ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION MARCH 1, 2006 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 5:30 PM CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL EXECUTIVE SESSION AT OR AFTER 5:30 PM 1. Pursuant to ARS §38-431.03(A)(3) and (A)(4), Council may vote to go into Executive Session for discussion regarding the status of the Pille litigation (Pima Co. Superior Court No. CV 2005 6580) and Olson notice of claim, and for consultation for legal advice, and to consider its position and possibly direct the Town Attorney and/or outside legal counsel regarding the same. 2. Pursuant to ARS §38-431.03(A)(3), (A)(4) and (A)(7), Council may vote to go into Executive Session for the purpose of consultation for legal advice with the Town Attorney and for consultation with Town representatives regarding the status of negotiations / eminent domain litigation for the possible acquisition of a portion of the real property known as Steam Pump Ranch (Northwest side of Oracle Road, at Hanley Boulevard, Oro Valley). RESUME REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS —TOWN MANAGER COUNCIL REPORTS DEPARTMENT REPORTS TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT The Mayor and Council may consider and/or take action on the items listed below: ORDER OF BUSINESS: MAYOR WILL REVIEW THE ORDER OF THE MEETING CALL TO AUDIENCE — At this time, any member of the public is allowed to address the Mayor and Town Council on any issue not listed on today's agenda. Pursuant to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, individual Council Members may ask Town Staff to review the matter, ask that the matter be placed on a future agenda, or respond to criticism made by speakers. However, the Mayor and Council may not discuss or take legal action on matters raised during • 63/01/06 Agenda, Council Regular Session 2 "Call to Audience." In order to speak during "Call to Audience" please specify whatv ou wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. PRESENTATION OF PLAQUE OF APPRECIATION TO STEVE RI VERA FOR HIS SERVICE ON THE WATER UTILITY COMMISSION 1. CONSENT AGENDA In accordance with Section 2-4-6 of the Oro Valley Town Code, Consent Agenda items are items of business that are of a routine nature and shall g I be be introduced by a motion "To approve the Consent Agenda", and shat considered by the Council as a single item. There shall be no debate or discussion by any member of the council regarding any item on the consent agenda, beyond asking questions for simple clarification. Any consent item may be pulled at the request of a council member only and considered individually. The item pulled from the consent agenda may be discussed with full debate. (Consideration and/or possible action) A. Minutes — 02-01-06 B. Resolution No. (R)06-10 Authorizing and approving a job order contract with Centennial Contractors Enterprises, Inc. facilitated through the Cooperative Purchase Agreement between the Town and Mohave Educational Services Cooperative for the remodeling of the Oro Valley Police Department Cop. C. Progress Report: Development of a draft policy by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board for donations to the Town and Naming Rights Opportunities D. Status Report on the Southwest Planning Area Feasibility Study 2. OV12-05-23 REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A RETAIL CENTER, KNOWN AS BIG HORN COMMERCE CENTER, LOCATED EAST OF ORACLE ROAD AND SOUTH OF NORTH RAMS FIELD PASS, PARCELS 220-04-01OP AND 220-04-010R Explanation: Bob Solfisburg, representing JPS Real Estate is requesting approval of a development plan for a retail center known as Big Horn Commerce Center. The property is 3.3 acres in size and zoned C-1 Commercial District. The proposed Development Plan consists of two separate buildings with a combined floor area of 28,985 square feet, with proposed uses that include a restaurant and general retail. 3. CONSIDERATION AND/OR POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING DIRECTION FROM TOWN COUNCIL TO WATER UTILITY STAFF TO PARTICIPATE IN DEVELOPING A COOPERATIVE REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY ORGANIZATION AS PROPOSED BY THE SOUTHERN ARIZONA WATER USERS ASSOCIATION 03/01/06 Agenda, Council Regular Session 3 4. CONSIDERATION AND/OR POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING HOT WATER RECIRCULATION SYSTEMS: CONTINUAL OPERATION SYSTEMS VS. POINT OF SERVICE SYSTEMS 5. CONSIDERATION AND/OR POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THE PROPOSED 2006 HOLIDAY PARADE 6. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS (The Council may bring forth general topics for future meeting agendas. Council may not discuss, deliberate or take any action on the topics presented pursuant to ARS 38-431.02H) CALL TO AUDIENCE — At this time, any member of the public is allowed to address the Mayor and Town Council on any issue not listed on today's agenda. Pursuant to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, individual Council Members may ask Town Staff to review the matter, ask that the matter be placed on a future agenda, or respond to criticism made by speakers. However, the Mayor and Council may not discuss or take legal action on matters raised during y "Call to Audience." In order to speak during "Call to Audience" please specify whaty ou wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. ADJOURNMENT POSTED: 02/17/06 4:00 p.m. lh Whenp ossible, a packet of agenda materials as listed above is available for public inspection at least 24 hours prior to the Council meeting in the office of the Town Clerk between the hours of 8:00 a.m. — 5:00p.m. The Town of Oro Valley complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If any person with a disability needs any type of accommodation, please notify the Town Clerk's Office at least five days prior to the Council meeting at 229- 4700. 0/01/06 Agenda, Council Regular Session 4 INSTRUCTIONS TO SPEAKERS Memberspublicright of the have the ri ht to speak during posted public hearings. However, those items not listed as a public hearing are for consideration and action by the Town Council during the course of their business meeting. Members of the public may be allowed to speak on such topics at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. Ify ou wish to address the Town Council on any specific agenda item(s), please complete a speaker card located on the Agenda table at the back of the room andg ive it to the Town Clerk. Please indicate on the speaker card which item number and topic on which you wish to speak. If you wish to speak during "Call to Audience", please specify what topic you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. Please step forward to the podium when the Mayor calls your name to speak on the item(s) on the agenda which you are interested in addressing. 1. Please state your name and address for the record. 2. Speak only on the issue currently being discussed by Council. Please organize your speech, you will only be allowed to address the Council once regarding the topic being discussed. 3. Please limit your comments to 3 minutes. 4. During "Call to Audience" you may address the Council on any issue you wish. 5. Any member of the public speaking must speak in a courteous and respectful manner to those present. Thank you for your cooperation. (DRAFT) MINUTES ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION FEBRUARY 1, 2006 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 5:30 PM CALL TO ORDER 5:30 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Paul Loomis, Mayor Terry Parish, Vice Mayor Paula Abbott, Council Member K.C. Carter, Council Member Conny Culver, Council Member Helen Dankwerth, Council Member Barry Gillaspie, Council Member EXECUTIVE SESSION AT OR AFTER 5:30 PM MOTION: A MOTION was made by Council Member Carter and SECONDED by Council Member Dankwerth to go in to Executive Session for the following purpose: 1. Pursuant to ARS 38-431 .03(A) Annual Evaluation of the Chief of Police Mayor Loomis announced that in addition to the Town Council and the Town Attorney, Chief of Police Danny Sharp would be present in Executive Session. MOTION CARRIED, 7 — 0. MOTION: A MOTION was made by Council Member Dankwerth and SECONDED by Council Member Culver to go out of Executive Session at 6:37 p.m. Motion carried, 7 — 0. RESUME REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Paul Loomis, Mayor Terry Parish, Vice Mayor Paula Abbott, Council Member K.C. Carter, Council Member Conny Culver, Council Member Helen Dankwerth, Council Member Barry Gillaspie, Council Member f 1 02/01/06 Minutes, Council Regular Session 2 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Loomis led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS Police Chief Danny Sharp reviewed the upcoming meetings and events. COUNCIL REPORTS Council Member Carter invited the public to attend the Candidate Forums that were being held in the next few weeks. DEPARTMENT REPORTS Water UtilityDirector PhilipSaletta reported that they are starting an exploratory boring project on a site south of Pusch View Lane and west of the Rock Ridge Apartments to look for a possible new water source for the Town. Town Clerk Kathryn Cuvelier reported that the Primary Election is March 14 and it will be a Ballot-by-Mail Election with ballots being mailed out starting February 9th She also stated that the voter registration deadline for the Primary Election is February 13th TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT — No report CALL TO AUDIENCE Ramon Gaanderse, 310 S. Williams Boulevard, introduced himself and stated that he was the new Executive Director of the Metropolitan Pima Alliance (MPA), a not-for-profit organization made up.of builders, developers, construction, real .. estate members, etc. He stated that the MPA membership is set up to help guide Pima County and Oro Valley as they grow and he offered their services to the Town. PRESENTATION FROM ARIZONA GAME & FISH REGARDING MOUNTAIN LION AWARENESS Gerald Perry, Arizona Game and Fish, presented a PowerPoint presentation regarding Mountain Lion awareness, public safety, and the campaign to educate the public regarding coexistence with and conservation of wildlife. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY CITIZEN PLANNING INSTITUTE GRADUATION Mayor Loomis and Community Development Director Brent Sinclair congratulated the graduates of the 9th Annual Citizens Planning Institute and presented Certificates of Completion to the following: Bill Adler, Mark Arneson, 02/01/06 Minutes, Council Regular Session 3 Bob Baughman, John Beck, Teree Bergman, John Buette, Robert Delaney, Lynanne Dellerman, Margaret Fischer, Lisa Foster, Edwin Fujinaka, Mario Gran , ado Thomas Gribb, Darrell Jenkins, Celinda Jensen, Jennifer Jones, Chuck Kill, g ,Jim Kriegh, JoyLautenschlaeger, Charlie Lentner, Jon Marenfield, Andy Martin, RayPaolino, Paul Parisi, Sharayah Plymale, William Rivera, Glen Rockwell, Ted Rykowski, Peter Salonga, Pam Sarpalius,Ned Shipp, Kathy Shipp, John Thomas, Chris Wadman, Elodie Winger, and Mike Zinkin. 1. CONSENT AGENDA At the request of Council Member Abbott, the minutes of January 4, 2006 were pulled from the Consent Agenda. MOTION: Council Member Carter MOVED to APPROVE the Consent Agenda without the January 4, 2006 minutes. Motion carried, 7 — 0. MOTION: Council Member Abbott MOVED to CONTINUE approval of the January 4, 2006 minutes until the next meeting so she could listen to the tapes of the .meeting Mayor or Loomis SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 6 — 1, with Vice Mayor Parish opposed. A. Minutes — 1/04/06 (Continued); 1/11/06; 1/18/06 B. Police Report— December 2005 Statistics C. Acceptance of License Amendment No. 1 to operate and maintain additional pedestrian path area not included in the Intergovernmental Agreement recorded on July 10, 2003 in Docket 12089 at page 517 in the Office of the Pima County, Arizona, Recorder D. Appointment of Mr. Winston Tustison to the Water Utility Commission to fill the unexpired term of Steve Rivera with term effective through June 30, 2007 E. Approval of an agreement with MuniFinanciallor the administration/billing of Oracle Road Improvement District 2. PUBLIC HEARING — ORDINANCE NO. (0)06-03 OV8-95-1 A REQUEST FOR RENEWAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A 78 FOOT TELECOMMUNICATIONS TOWER, LOCATED AT THE TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER SUBSTATION, 65 EAST TANGERINE ROAD, PARCEL #219-53-001A Kevin Wallace, Marken Telecom Services, representing Crown Castle stated that they are requesting renewal of a conditional use permit for a telecommunications tower located near Tangerine Road. He explained that the tower was built in 1995 under a previous ordinance. He said that the original company sold the tower to Crown Castle who subsequently allowed their lease permit to expire. Therefore, they are asking that the conditional use permit be renewed. Community Development Director Brent Sinclair reported that the original conditional use permit (CUP) was granted in 1995 to Bell Atlantic for this facility 02/01/06 Minutes, Council Regular Session 4 which sits north of Tangerine Road. He stated that the term of the CUP was for 10ears and expired on July 1, 2005. Mr. Sinclair stated that Crown Castle y purchased the tower which also holds two wireless carriers' facilities. He stated that the tower was/is permitted under R1-144 zoning; however, due to Zoning Code amendments, the current height of the tower at 75 feet (81 feet to the top of the antennas) is above that allowed in the current Code (40 feet currently allowed.) Mr. Sinclair also explained that the current Code has provisions that require that stealth applications be used for these types of facilities. Mr. Sinclair then noted that there are vested rights associated with this request since the original CUP was approved in 1995. Mr. Sinclair then reported that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the CUP with conditions. Discussion followed regarding: • Length of time period for the new CUP to be in effect (none specified.) • Future needs may require more signal strength for clients which may require more features. • Possibly make any decrease of intensity or bringing it closer to • conformance subject to Administrative approval. • Stealth criteria (3 tiers). • Any new facility of this type on Town-owned land would require a CUP and hearings before the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Town Council. • Co-location of additional facilities Crown Castle would probably refuse any new facilities due to conditions being applied. Loomis opened thepublic hearing. There being no speakers, the public Mayor p g hearing was closed. MOTION: Council Member Abbott MOVED to ADOPT Ordinance (0)06-03, Conditional Use Permit for Crown Castle to the Town Council with a recommendation for approval, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit "A.: EXHIBIT "A" (Amended per Motion) • alteration (excludingbasic maintenance/repairs) or added uses and/or 1. Any _ appurtenances to the telecommunications pole shall necessitate conformance of the entire pole and equipment to the current Oro. Valley Zoning Code Revised standards. 2. Any such change to the pole that decreases the intensity or brings it into closer conformance with the current Code shall not necessitate an amendment to the Conditional Use Permit if approved by the Planning and Zoning Administrator. Changes not approved by the Planning and Zoning Administrator shall be subject to Planning and Zoning Commission review. Council Member Dankwerth SECONDED the motion. DISCUSSION: Vice Mayor Parish stated that cell phone services are an issue of public safety and he had concerns regarding the conditions in Exhibit "A". He 02/01/06 Minutes, Council Regular Session 5 stated that the Police Department, Sheriff's Department and Fire Departments use equipment that routinely communicate with those towers and there are alreadyissues with the current services "dropping out." He stated that he could << „ not support this motion due to the conditions listed in Exhibit "A". Mayor Loomis stated that he felt that the conditions as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission are good. He stated that the technology in communications is changing rapidly so it might be easier to put in a new tower that would meet the new technology and would also meet the Town's criteria rather than adapting the existing tower. Vice Mayor Parish further commented that technology does not change the "line of sight" and if you reduce the height of the tower, you also reduce its effectiveness. AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION: Council Member Gillaspie suggested the following condition as a replacement for the Planning and Zoning Commission's condition #2: "Any such change to the pole that decreases the intensity or brings it into closer conformance with the current Code shall not necessitate an amendment to the Conditional Use Permit if approved by the Planning and Zoning Administrator. Changes not approved by the Planning and Zoning Administrator shall be subject to Planning and Zoning Commission review." Council Member Abbott and Council Member Dankwerth accepted the amendment. MOTION AS AMENDED carried, 5 — 2, with Vice Mayor Parish and Council Member Culver opposed. Mayor Loomis recessed the meeting at 8:02 p.m. The meeting resumed at 8:07 p.m. 3. RESOLUTION NO. (R)06-03 DISCUSSION, CONDERATION, AND/OR ACTION OF A RESOLUTION BETWEEN THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, AND CANADA VISTAS TOWN CENTER, LLC REGARDING THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL MITIGATION OF THE PERIPHERAL AREA OF HONEY BEE VILLAGE Community Development Director Brent Sinclair explained that this agreement would secure the donation of a 13-acre archeological core area (Honey Bee Village) located at Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and Moore Road from Canada Vistas to Pima County ownership and would solidify Pima County's commitment to conduct and pay for comprehensive archeological surveys and data recovery within the peripheral area owned by Canada Vistas. MOTION: Vice Mayor Parish MOVED to APPROVE Resolution (0)06-03. Council Member Culver SECONDED the motion. DISCUSSION: In response to a question from Council Member Carter, Mr. Sinclair explained that the Town would be responsible for designing and building 02/01/06 Minutes, Council Regular Session 6 the wall but the wall would be on Canada Vista property right along the edge of the Preserve. He explained that the maintenance of the wall would be addressed in a separate agreement. MOTION CARRIED, 7 — 0. 4. PROPOSED TRAIL AND INFORMATION SIGNAGE AT NARANJA TOWN SITE — DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION Vice Mayor Parish reviewed an overhead map of the Naranja Town Site area and Y stated that this item was proposed by Mayor Loomis for Council's consideration. He explained that this item has also been presented to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board (PRAB). He then read a letter in support of the proposed trail system from Tom Honebrink, PRAB Chair. Vice Mayor Parish reviewed the Naranja Town Site Master Plan. He then reviewed the proposed trails and explained that the Mayor's proposal outlines trails and signage for the property. He stated that the proposal recommends construction of approximately four miles of trails on the site already specified on the Master Plan, a vehicular access off of Naranja Drive and parking area, plus appropriate signage and support facilities. Vice Mayor Parish explained that by placing the trails and interpretive signage on the site, it would open up the park by providing safe trails and also give people the opportunity to get an idea of how the Naranja Town Site would be developed in the future. Vice Mayor Parish reviewed the fiscal impact to the Town and noted that the request from the current year's budget is $20,000. Vice Mayor Parish further explained that the Mayor has been working with community leaders to gather corporate sponsorship. He then explained that he has seen up to 50 people accessing the site now and these proposed trail improvements would increase public safety. He then requested approval of the proposed trails plan and stated that this is a great opportunity to educate the public on the Naranja Town Site. Further discussion followed regarding: Liability — Have liability issues now as people are accessing the park and steps have not been taken to make it safer. Improved trails would allow the Police Department to patrol on ATVs and bicycles. Posted hours would help with enforcement and patrol and thus provide a safer environment than what is currently present. Contingency Fund - $20,000 would come from Contingency now for initial trail construction. Further costs would be allocated through the Parks and Recreation Department Budget for upcoming years. With possible corporate sponsorships and help from volunteer community groups such as the Boy Scouts, there is a great opportunity to bring Town costs down. Staff time/Tools — Estimated time of Parks employees 4 hours @ 5 days a week (transport of equipment, maintenance of trails, garbage cans, etc.) Staff time 02/01/06 Minutes, Council Regular Session 7 does not include Police Department hours. Tools include a Gator or small ATV (variable costs.) Trail System — Used West Lambert Lane Park as model for cost estimates, etc. Improved trails help protect site as well as protect the public. Signage — Would address rules of park, hours, lack of facilities, etc. Entry kiosks _ g would establish rules as you enter the park area and would evolve as conditions change. Mayor Loomis opened the floor for public comment. Margot Hurst, 11878 N. Crescendo Drive, PRAB member, said that PRAB was very excited about the proposal. She stated that this is a great first step in gettingthe Naranja Town Site started and in getting the public involved. Don Cox, 1065 W. Squawbush Court, stated that anything the Town can do to further the Naranja Town Site is a great idea. He then expressed concerns regarding one area of the proposed trail on the western side of the site that would sit about 15 feet higher than a few of the houses. He stated that these homeowners have expressed concern about people looking down into their yards. He asked that the Town be sensitive to their concerns when planning the trail. Mr. Cox further expressed concerns about possible parking along Eagle Landing Place as it is a very narrow street. He asked that parking be carefully planned. (Vice Mayor Parish explained that staff has already addressed parking issues and is planning accordingly. He also said that there are two areas where the trail could possibly sit above the neighbors' yards, and staff would address these areas as they planned the trails.) Bill Nettling, 8021 N. Totavi Trail, stated that the proposed trail system was a great idea and he encouraged the Council to move forward. He also stated that there are many youth groups in the area that would be using the proposed fields in the Naranja Town Site and suggested that these groups (Little League, Pop Warner, BMX and Soccer groups) could help raise money. He also said that the current parks are overcrowded and these new parks would provide relief. MOTION: Council Member Carter MOVED to approve the proposal brought forward by Mayor Loomis to construct a trail system, parking lot and appropriate signage on the Naranja Town Site property and authorize up to $20,000 from the Town's General Fund Contingency for the 2005/06 fiscal year. Motion SECONDED by Council Member Culver. FURTHER DISCUSSION followed regarding Police Department hours, patrolling on bicycles, ATVs and on foot, factoring maintenance costs of ATVs, staff working with neighbors on placement of trails, parking at Copper Creek Elementary School (working with the School District and agreement already in effect for joint use on weekends), using Adopt-A-Trail program for trail maintenance. MOTION CARRIED, 7 — 0. • 02/01/06 Minutes, Council Regular Session 8 5. CONSIDERATION AND/OR POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING DIRECTION FROM TOWN COUNCIL TO STAFF TO FORMULATE A POLICY AND/OR BUILDING CODE CHANGES ADDRESSING GRAYWATER REUSE AND RAINWATER WATER HARVESTING Water Utility Director Philip Saletta reviewed the Council Communication regarding water conservation measures specifically addressing graywater reuse and rainwater water harvesting. He reviewed a PowerPoint presentation and highlighted the following; • Water Conservation Program Update o Audit Program (500+ audits have saved over 7 million gallons of water.) o Rain Sensor Program o Newsletter o Water Conservation Alliance of Southern Arizona o Recharge Projects Study— Big Wash o Reclaimed Water Project (Saved more than 70 million gallons since November.) • Graywater Reuse o Concept — Re-use water that would normally drain to the sanitary sewer system or septic systems from sinks, showers, tubs, washing machines. 'o Water from toilets would still drain to sanitary sewer or septic systems. o Town Code does not preclude.or prohibit Graywater reuse (Would follow International Plumbing Code.) o ADEQ Regulations apply. Permit compliance required. o Arizona House Bill 2323 allows for tax credit. .o Reviewed Graywater Reuse issues. • Rain Water Harvesting o Oro Valley Town Code - Nothing precludes or prohibits rain water harvesting and use. o Arizona House Bill 2323 allows for tax credit. o Not as many concerns with rain water harvesting vs. graywater reuse. o Reviewed Rain Water Harvesting issues. • Water Utility Commission Discussion o Concern for graywater system operation with respect to water quality and public health. o Rain Water Harvesting could be passive systems — drainage control. o Other forms of water conservation: • Reclaimed Water System • Water Audits • Continued Public Education o Potential fiscal impact to Water Utility 02/01/06 Minutes, Council Regular Session 9 o Further review Building Code or Drainage Criteria Manual changes for recommendations to Town Council. • Recommendations: o Provide language in Building Code for commercial and residential sites to have option to install dual pipe systems and/or option to install graywater system and/or option to install rain water harvesting systems. o Work with Community Development, Public Works and Legal staff to develop potential changes to Building Code and Drainage criteria Manual. o Provide for public input process for customers, citizens, SAHBA, builders and landscapers. o Assess potential fiscal impact on Water Utility. o Assess potential impact to Water Utility Reclaimed Water availability. o Further review by Water Utility Staff and Commission and present to Town Council for approval. Furtherregarding discussion followed re ardin permitting process, criteria, notifications to homebuyers who may buy home with graywater system installed, possible expansion of reclaimed water system, safety hazards, etc. Mayor Loomis opened the floor for public comment„ Alex Jacome, SAHBA, 2840 N. Country Club, stated that Pima County is also looking into water conservation and maybe graywater reuse is not the only way. He explained that they have been working with the U of A College of Architecture in settingup a Graywater Seminar as there is not,a,lot�of definitive information regarding graywater use. He applauded the Town on its reclaimed water system and also stated that SAHBA would be happy to help the Town in its efforts regarding rain water harvesting, etc. Town Engineer CraigCivalier stated that the Department of Public Works supports rainwater harvesting but have some concerns. He stated that they would work with the Water Utility to address their concerns. MOTION: Vice Mayor Parish MOVED to ACCEPT the recommendations from the Water Utility Staff with the additional instruction that they provide a report to the Town Council every two months regarding the progress that is being made and that they also consider hosting a workshop (possibly in conjunction with SAHBA.) Council Member Culver SECONDED the motion. FURTHER DISCUSSION followed regarding: • Oro Valley should be regionally involved in discussions regarding graywater usage and rainwater harvesting. • Need to make some decisions so that the Town Council can act. 02/01/06 Minutes, Council Regular Session 10 • Emphasis on water conservation and passive and active collection of rain water. • Possibly use the Metropolitan Pima Alliance for help putting together a workshop (Executive Director spoke during Call to Audience and offered their assistance where needed.) MOTION CARRIED, 7 — 0. 6. DISCUSSION AND/OR POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING TOWN COUNCIL CONSENT AGENDA PROCESS Mayor Loomis explained that during the Town Council Retreat, discussion took place regarding ways to speed up Town Council meetings and better ways to conduct Town business. He stated that some discussion included placing everything possible on the Consent Agenda and then ways of presenting those items if further clarification was needed by the Council. He asked Council for their feedback regarding the current Consent Agenda process. • Items can be pulled from the Consent Agenda if there are any questions on an item. Received one complaint but feels community as a whole is on board with the change. (V.M. Parish) • Feels have gone the right way. As long as there is the ability to pull items that may need clarification or elaboration, then we should continue with current process. (C.M. Dankwerth) • Might be some confusion on the part of members of the public as to when they can speak on Agenda items. May want to clarify instructions to the speakers. Also, work oh communication with the citizens so if they feel an item needs to be further discussed, a Council Member could request that the item be pulled. (C. M. Gillespie) • Make sure full details are still included in the Council Communications for Council's review. (C.M. Carter) • Council agendas and packet materials are available on the Town's website for the public to review. (Town Clerk Kathryn Cuvelier) • Applicants and staff should still be present at Council meetings to make a presentation or answer questions if necessary. • Agree full background information still needs to be included even though items are placed on Consent Agenda. Also, clarify and expand instructions to speakers. (C.M. Abbott) 7. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Council Member Abbott - Consideration and Possible Action regarding direction from Town Council to staff to formulate a Policy or Building Code changes addressing Point of Service Systems. (Bring forward in one month.) Vice Mayor Parish — Police Department Report regarding current communication systems being integrated into the wireless networks and the importance of the systems' reliability. (Bring forward 3 meetings from tonight.) 02/01/06 Minutes, Council Regular Session 11 CALL TO AUDIENCE — No speakers. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: A MOTION was made by Council Member Carter and SECONDED by Council Member Culver to adjourn at 9:42 p.m. Motion carried, 7 — 0. Prepared by: Roxana Garrity, CMC Deputy Town Clerk- I herebycertifythat the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the g g minutes of the regular session of the Town of Oro Valley Council of Oro Valley, Arizona held on the 1st day of February 2006. I further certify that the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present. Dated this day of , 2006. Kathryn E. Cuvelier, CMC Town Clerk B TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: March 1 , 2006 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: Jose N. Rodriguez, Engineering Division Manager SUBJECT: Resolution No. (R) 06- to , a Resolution of the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, approving a job order contract with Centennial Contractors Enterprises, Inc. facilitated through the Cooperative Purchase Agreement between the Town and Mohave Educational Services Cooperative for the Remodeling of the Oro Valley Police Department SUMMARY: The Mohave Educational Services Cooperative ("Mohave") is an eligible procurement unit authorized to facilitate Cooperative Purchasing Agreements in accordance with Arizona's public procurement process. Pursuant to ARS § 41-2631, et seq., a Cooperative Purchase Agreement allows eligible procurement units, such as the Town, to procure services from vendors at prices and terms contained in contracts entered into by other eligible procurement units, such as Mohave. The Town entered into a Cooperative Purchase Agreement with Mohave in March 2000 which allows the Town to procure services from vendors at prices and terms contained in contracts between Mohave and vendors. One method the Town may use to procure services from vendors at the prices and terms contained in contracts between Mohave and those vendors is called Job Order Contracting ("JOC"). Under JOC, when a specific project or "job order" is issued, the member, in this case the Town, and the contractor subsequently agree on the scope and cost. The Town used this JOC method to submit a job order to Mohave for the remodeling of the Oro Valley Police Department. Centennial Contractors Enterprises, Inc., being under a master contract with Mohave, was selected to perform the work on the Oro Valley Police Department remodeling. The Cost Proposal received by Mohave from Centennial Contractors Enterprises, Inc. is for $150,480. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution (R) 06 -10 2. Mohave Contract with Centennial Contractors Enterprises, Inc. & Proposal Cost dated January 23, 2006. 3. History of Mohave 4. Mohave Job Order Contracting Information FISCAL IMPACT: The OVPD has budgeted $157,000 in the FY 05/06 Budget TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Page 2 of 2 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: March 1 , 2006 SUGGESTED MOTION: The Town Council may wish to consider one of the following motions: I move to approve Resolution (R) 06- 10 authorizing the Mayor and Council to approve a job order contract with Centennial Contractors Enterprises, Inc. facilitated through the Cooperative Purchase Agreement between the Town and Mohave Educational Services Cooperative for the Remodeling of the Oro Valley Police Department. Or I move to deny Resolution (R) 06-10 r Or ; move to -/ N- 1 -1,4_, Ltk ,,t-/r1/7 cr ose Roy iguez, Engineering Division Mgr _ .! ' \ n ow ,..„ : . ,,„, i- DSharp,�'hief of Policey Lit:Lt AA, Cr�ig C ,t iv ier , Town Engineer 1 f D. .'• �/drews, %.'stantTown Mana.- Chuck Swee ,� own Manager RESOLUTION NO. (R) 06- 10 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, AND APPROVING A JOB ORDER CONTRACT WITH CENTENNIAL CONTRACTORS ENTERPRISES, INC., FACILITATED THROUGH THE COOPERATIVE PURCHASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TOWN AND MOHAVE EDUCATIONAL SERVICES COOPERATIVE FOR THE REMODELING OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT WHEREAS, the Town of Oro Valley is a municipal corporation within the State of Arizona and, pursuant ARS § 41-2631 et seq., the Town is authorized to enter into "Cooperative Purchasing Agreements" with other "eligible procurement units" as defined by statute; and WHEREAS, the Mohave Educational Services Cooperative ("Mohave") is an eligible procurement unit authorized to facilitate Cooperative Purchasing Agreements in accordance with Arizona's public procurement process; and WHEREAS, under ARS § 41-2631 et seq., a Cooperative Purchase Agreement allows eligible procurement units, such as the Town, to procure services from vendors at the prices and terms contained in contracts entered into by other eligible procurement units, such as Mohave; and WHEREAS, the Town entered into a Cooperative Purchase Agreement with Mohave in March of 2000 which allows the Town to procure services from vendors at the prices and terms contained in contracts between Mohave and those vendors; and WHEREAS, one process by which the Town may procure services from vendors at the prices and terms contained in contracts between Mohave and those vendors is called Job Order Contracting ("JOC") as authorized under ARS § 41-2631 et seq.; and WHEREAS, JOC is an alternative project delivery method for construction services where a master contract is established, in this case by Mohave, with standard specifications and set unit pricing; and WHEREAS, under JOC, when a specific project, or "job order" is issued, the member, in this case the Town, and the contractor subsequently agree on the scope and cost; and WHEREAS, Mohave has entered into a master contract with vendor Centennial Contractors Enterprises, Inc.; and WHEREAS, the Town submitted a job order to Mohave for the remodeling of the OV Police Department; and WHEREAS, Centennial Contractors Enterprises, Inc., being under contract with Mohave, was selected to perform the work on the OV Police Department remodeling; and F:\Public Works'Agreementskentennial PD remodeling\Resolution.doc Town of Oro Valley Attorney's Office/ca/020706 WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the Town to use Centennial Contractors Enterprises, Inc. to perform the remodeling of the OV Police Department through a job order contract under the Cooperative Purchasing Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, authorizing and approving a job order contract with Centennial Contractors Enterprises Inc. facilitated through the Cooperative Purchase Agreement between the Town and Mohave for the remodeling of the Town of Oro Valley Police Department BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and any other administrative officials of the Town of Oro Valley are hereby authorized to take such steps as are necessary to execute and implement the job order contract to remodel the OV Police Department. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 1st day of March , 2006. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Paul H. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk Melinda Garrahan, Town Attorney F.\Public Works\Agreementskentennial PD remodeling\Resolution.doc Town of Oro Valley Attorney's Office/ca/020706 III Centennial Contractors 3925 East 29th Street Suite 404 Transmittal f ucson, Arizona 85711 520-298-7350 To:Town of Oro Valley Date: January 23, 2006 Public Works Department/Engineering Division Re: Oro ValleyPolice Dept. Remodel 11000 N. La Canada Dr. / Oro Valley, AZ 85737 -'.`��'s" = _ Attention: Jose Rodriguez z` 1 • - s li'NW4650,00 ; 0� o � i0v% We are sending you: 0 J••=: - t ® Herewith 0 Under separate cover via the - ,. following items: `'��.. Manufacturer's Data :, a a ❑Shop drawings ❑Prints ❑ Plans ,``. `I-�, = `- ❑Samples ❑Specifications ❑Change OrdOE _' ❑:Com°of�letter ®Other '� Copies Date No. Description 1 1-23-06 Proposal— Base p p Bid—Oro Valley Police Dept. Remodel 1-23-06 Proposal— Base Bid including VE— Oro Valley Police Dept. Remodel _ 1-23-06 Proposal—Additive Alternate—Oro Valley Police Dept. Remodel 1-20-06 Deliver Order Proposal and Work Plan—Oro Valley Police Dept. Remodel e of Work—Oro Valley - 12-12-05 Detailed Scope Police Dept. Remodel lel 1-23-06 MS Projects Schedule—Oro Valley Police Dept. Remodel 1-20-06 R. S. Means detailed line item estimate—Base Bid—Oro ValleyPolice Dept. Remodel 1-23-06 R. S. Means detailed line item estimate— Base Bid inc. VE—Oro ValleyPolice _ Remodel Dept. 1-20-06 R. S. Means detailed line item estimate—Additive Alternate—Oro Valley Police Dept. Remodel These are transmitted as checked below: ®For Approval ❑For Review and Comment 0 For Your Use ❑ Return for Corrections 0 Return Corrected Prints ❑As Requested ❑Approved as Submitted ❑ For Bids Due ❑ Resubmit Copies for Approval❑Other ❑Approved as Noted Submit Copies for Distribution Remarks: 7/14,e,e41 /5 Copies To: Yours truly, �-- Centennial Contractors File: By: Dee Eldridge kil Centennial Contractors a Enterprises,Inc. ;:t244'' Summary Sheet CCE Mohave Contract #: 04E-CENT-0901 Date: January 23, 2006 CCE# 68-0195 Title: Oro Valley Police Dept. Remodel Location: Oro Valley Base Bid $ 136,060 Base Bid including V.E. Option $ 132,399 Additive Alternate $ 18,081 Prices include bond and sales tax Base Bid + Additive Alternate Proposal Cost: $ 154,141 Base Bid including V.E. Option + Additive Alternate Proposal Cost: $ 150,480 CENTENNIAL CONTRACTORS ENTERPRISES, Inc. _/v/a/L, 40a/2/2012) Gary Sparrow Project General Manager 3925 E.29th Street 520/298-7350 Office Suite 404 520/298-7355 Fax Tucson,AZ 85711 CENTENNIAL CONTRACTORS ENTERPRISES, INC. JOC CONTRACT NO. 04E-CENT-0901 DELIVERY ORDER PROPOSAL AND WORK PLAN Project No.: Date: 1/2%6 CCE No.: 68-0195 Location: Oro Valley Estimated Construction Duration: 91 Calendar Days ET: Title: Oro Valley Police Dept. Remodel Description of Delivery Order: I. TECHNICAL PLAN: Scope of Work: See detailed Scope of Work A. Assumptions: (1)Permits & Fees not required I taw (2) Work to be performed during normal business hours (3) Owner to provide and pay for electrical power for equipment and tools (4) Workers to have unrestricted access to the entire project area B. Special or long lead-time equipment and materials: Storefront, Bullet resistant products C. Interface with existing structure: Yes D. Possible disruption to building personnel and plans to minimize: Yes E. Outages: Electrical circuits connected to the remodel work,fire alarm system,fire sprinkler system F. Special training/Orientation Requirements: None G. Work to be performed during non-normal hours: None H. Outage Coordination: None I. Schedule Issues: None J. Special Issues: None ter K. Special Security Requirements: None L. Significant Milestones: None Page 1 of 2 M. Hazardous Materials: MSDS sheets will beP rovided N. Quality Assurance Considerations: II. STAFFING PLAN: A. Project Manager: Dee Eldridge C. QualityControl Coordinator: Steve Graham B. Superintendent: Steve Graham D. Subcontractors: Demo, Doors,oors, Drywall, ACT, Flooring, Paint, Fire Alarm, Fire Sprinkler, Mechanical, Electrical III. PERMITS: A. Excavation: None B. Burning: None Welding: None Cutting: None IV. DETAILED COST ESTIMATE: A. Wage Determination applicable to this order is None B. Estimates included with this Work Plan: (1)Base Bid, (2)Base Bid including VE, (3)Additive Alternate Site N/A Structural N/A Plumbing N/A V. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: See Scope of Work VI. CONSTRUCTIBILITY & VALUE ENGINEERING : SUGGESTIONS. See Value Engineering in Scope ofWork - Omit tilefrom Room 'P06, replace with carpet. Centennial Contractors Enterprises, Inc. Submitted By: Gary Sparrow Project General Manager Page 2 of 2 CENTENN'iAL CONTRACTORS ENTERPRISES INC. Scope of Work - RFP Scope of Work - Base Bid Version 1 Job Name: Police Station Remodel Job Location: 11000 N. La Canada Dr. Date: December 12, 2005 CCE#: 68-0195 1 PROJECT OVERVIEW A) Remodel the Police Station located in the Oro Valley town center 2 PROJECT INTENT AND SCOPE A) Remodel the existing Lobby and Records to provide more space for records (approximate floor area: 1250 sf). B) Create a sally port from the existing exterior, under cover entrance area. C) Additive Alternate: Remodel the existing Communications area to provide one additional office (approximate floor area: 250sf). 3 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS A) If the Additive Alternate is selected to be implemented, the Additive Alternate work shall be constructed prior to other work as a separate event. B) In order to minimize police department disruption during construction, contractors are required to have materials and equipment ready and scheduling confirmed prior to start of construction. C) All work will be in accordance with the applicable codes as specified on Sheet A0.1. D) All work shall be in compliance with the General Notes and General Remodeling Notes as specified on Sheet A0.2. 4 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS - Execution Requirements A) Provide dumpster for disposal of all construction generated waste. B) Clean-up on a daily basis to the extent that no nuisance trash/debris or safety hazard remains during the "non-construction hours." C) Final clean-up at the conclusion of the project to remove any evidence of the construction efforts of this project. D) Provide temporary fence around dumpster. E) Provide tempoary toilet and hand wash facilities. F) Provide material storage containers. 5 SITE - Selective Demolition A) Provide dust partitions to isolate construction areas. B) All work shall be in compliance with the General Demolition Notes as specified on Sheets A0.2, A0.6, A2.4 and General / Demolition Plan Notes on Sheet A2.4. C) Demo items shown on Sheets A2.4 and A2.1. Work to be in accordance with Notes and Keynotes on Sheet A2.02. Confirm limits of flooring removal with Floor Finish Schedule on Sheet A2.01. - Scope of Work - 1 of 7 CENTENNIAL CONTRACTORS ENTERPRISES INC. Scope of Work- D) Demo items shown on Sheet A3.1. Work to be in accordance with Keynotes on Sheet A3.1. 111110. E) Work to include removal of gypsum board at sally port soffit to allow access for mechanical and fire sprinkler work. 6 CONCRETE - NO PROPOSED WORK 7 MASONRY - NO PROPOSED WORK 8 METALS - NO PROPOSED WORK 9 WOOD & PLASTICS - NO PROPOSED WORK 10 THERMAL & MOISTURE PROTECTION - Sealants A) Provide fire blocking and draft stopping per IBC section 717. B) Provide sealants in accordance with System Notes on Sheet A0.3. C) Comply with Architectural Specifications on Sheet A0.5. 11 DOORS & WINDOWS - Doors, Frames and Hardware A) Provide wood doors and metal frames in accordance with Door Schedule and associated Notes and Remarks on Sheet A2.01. B) Provide door hardware in accordance with Door Hardware Schedule and associated Notes and Remarks on Sheet A2.01. kir C) Provide frames in accordance with System Notes on Sheet A0.3. D) Provide frames, doors and hardware submittal data in accordance with Required Submittals on Sheet A0.3. E) Comply with Architectural Specifications on Sheet A0.5. F) Install doors, frames and associated hardware in locations noted on Sheets A2.1 and in conformance with dimensions on Sheet A2.3. G) Work to be in accordance with Notes and Keynotes on Sheet A2.02 and Detail 05 on Sheet A8.1. 12 DOORS & WINDOWS - Storefront, Windows and Glazing A) Provide storefront doors in accordance with Door Schedule and associated Notes and Remarks on Sheet A2.01. B) Provide door hardware for storefront doors in accordance with Door Hardware Schedule and associated Notes and Remarks on Sheet A2.01. C) Provide windows in accordance with Window Schedule and associated Notes and Remarks on Sheet A2.01. D) Provide store front in accordance with System Notes on Sheet A0.3. E) Provide store front, glazing and hardware submittal data in accordance with Required Submittals on Sheet A0.3. F) Comply with Architectural Specifications on Sheet A0.5. G) Install storefront and glazing with associated hardware in locations noted on Sheets A2.1 and in conformance with dimensions on Sheet A2.3. Scope of Work - 2 of 7 CENTENNIAL CONTRACTORS ENTERPRISES INC. - Scope of Work - H) Work to be in accordance with Notes and Keynotes on Sheet A2.02 and Details 01 and 02 on Sheet A2.02. I) Modify skylight lens and frame per Detail 08 on Sheet A8.1. 13 DOORS & WINDOWS - ADA Operators A) Provide automatic ADA entrance operator and closer for storefront doors in accordance with Door Hardware Schedule and associated Notes and Remarks on Sheet A2.01. B) Provide submittal data in accordance with Required Submittals on Sheet A0.3. C) Comply with Architectural Specifications on Sheet A0.5. D) Install automatic ADA entrance operator and closer in location noted on Sheet A2.1. E) Work to be in accordance with Notes and Keynotes on Sheet A2.02 and Detail 02 on Sheet A2.02. 14 FINISHES - Framing and Gypsum Board A) Provide gypsum wallboard system and suspended gypsum board system in accordance with System Notes on Sheet A0.3. B) Provide gypsum drywall & systems submittal data in accordance with Required Submittals on Sheet A0.3. C) Comply with Architectural Specifications on Sheet A0.5. D) Install wall board and framing in locations noted on Sheets A2.1 and in conformance with dimensions on Sheet A2.3. E) Set window sill height per Window Schedule remark 05 on Sheet A2.01. F) Work to be in accordance with Notes and Keynotes on Sheet A2.02. G) Work to be in accordance with Details on Sheet A8.1. H) Work to include wood blocking per note F on sheet A2.1. I) Work to include repair/patching soffit in sally port per Detail Si on sheet A2.2. J) Work to include repair and finish of demo'd walls/ceilings per Keynote 01 on sheet A2.4. K) Work to include Keynotes 18 and 22 on sheet A3.1. L) Remove and replace particle board per Detail 07 on Sheet A8.1. M) Demo and reconstruct skylight shaft walls as required for new wall construction. N) Finish to be in compliance with Finish Notes on Sheet A2.02. 15 FINISHES - Suspended Lay-in Ceiling A) Provide suspended lay-in ceiling system in accordance with System Notes on Sheet A0.3. B) Provide acoustical tile ceilings submittal data in accordance with Required Submittals on Sheet A0.3. C) Comply with Architectural Specifications on Sheet A0.5. D) Install ceiling system in locations noted on Sheets A3.1. E) Work to be in accordance with Notes and Keynotes on Sheet A3.1. F) Work to be in accordance with Details on Sheet A8.1. G) Extra stock: Provide two unopened boxes of acoustical ceiling tile. Material to be from same maunfactured lot as materials installed and enclosed in original protective packaging with appropriate identifying labels. - Scope of Work - 3 of 7 CENTENNIAL CONTRACTORS ENTERPRISES INC. -Scope of Work 16 FINISHES - Flooring - Tile, VCT and Carpet A) Provide flooring materials in accordance with Floor Finish Schedule and associated Remarks on Sheet A2.01. B) Comply with Architectural Specifications on Sheets A0.5 & A0.6. C) Provide tile & carpeting submittal data in accordance with Required Submittals on Sheet A0.3. D) Install flooring materials in locations noted on Sheets A2.1 and in accordance with the Floor Finish Schedule. E) Work to be in accordance with Notes and Keynotes on Sheet A2.02. F) Extra stock: Provide one unopened box of VCT. Material to be from same maunfactured lot as materials installed and enclosed in original protective packaging with appropriate identifying labels. G) Extra stock: Provide four yards of carpet. Material to be from same maunfactured lot as materials installed and enclosed in protective packaging with appropriate identifying labels. Note: Extra carpet stock applies only to Communications area. 17 FINISHES - Paint A) Provide paint system in accordance with System Notes on Sheet A0.3. B) Provide paint submittal data in accordance with Required Submittals on Sheet A0.3. C) Comply with Architectural Specifications on Sheets A0.5 & A0.6. D) Apply paint to surfaces noted on Sheet A2.1. E) Work to be in accordance with Notes and Keynotes on Sheet A3.1. F) Work to include repainting repaired sections of soffit and sally port ceiling as required. G) Work to include cleaning existing exposed concrete in sally port . 18 FURNISHINGS - NO PROPOSED WORK 19 SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION - Fire Alarm Devices A) Comply with Architectural Specifications on Sheet A0.5. B) Relocate Fire Alarm System Annunciators from location shown on Sheet E1.1 to location shown on Sheet E1.2. C) Provide re-acceptance testing with Authority Having Jurisdiction. 20 SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION - Fire Sprinkler A) Modify the existing wet-pipe fire sprinkler system as an extension of the existing system as required to accommodate the new floor plan per sheet FP-1. B) Provide automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with System Notes on Sheet A0.3 and Mechanical Specifications on Sheet M3.1. C) Comply with Architectural Specifications on Sheet A0.5. D) Comply with Mechanical Specifications on Sheet M3.1. E) Install automatic fire sprinkler system per plan approved by Authority Having Jurisdiction. 21 CONVEYING SYSTEMS - NO PROPOSED WORK - Scope of Work - 4 of 7 CENTENNIAL CONTRACTORS ENTERPRISES INC. -Scope of Work - 22 MECHANICAL A) Provide labor, materials, tools, machinery, and equipment necessary for the construction of the mechanical systems specified and shown on the drawings including miscellaneous items required for proper execution and completion of said work. B) Provide mechanical equipment in accordance with Air Device Schedule and Fan Schedule and associated Remarks on Sheet M2.1. C) Provide submittal data in accordance with Submittals on Sheet M3.1. D) Comply with Architectural Specifications on Sheet A0.5. E) Comply with Mechanical Specifications on Sheet M3.1. F) Installation to be in general conformity with locations noted and in accordance with Keynotes/Keyed Notes on Sheets A3.1and M1.1. G) Work to be in accordance with Details on Sheet M2.1. H) Provide as-builts of work performed. 23 ELECTRICAL A) Provide labor, materials, tools, machinery, and equipment necessary for a complete electrical installation as specified and shown on the drawings including miscellaneous items required for proper execution and completion of said work. B) Provide lighting fixtures in accordance with Fixture Schedule on Sheet E3.1. C) Provide materials in accordance with Electrical Specifications on Sheet E4.1. D) Provide submittal data in accordance with Electrical Specifications on Sheet E4.1. E) Comply with Architectural Specifications on Sheet A0.5. F) Comply with Electrical Specifications on Sheet E4.1. %b. G) Work to include demolition per Sheet E1.1. H) Installation to be in general conformity with locations noted on Sheets A2.1, A3.1, E2.1 and E3.1. I) Work to be in accordance with Notes and Keynotes on Sheet A2.02. J) Work to include pre-wiring per Notes C,D and E on Sheet A2.1. K) Remove and deactivate dimmer switch per Detail 07 on Sheet A8.1. L) Work to include conduit and wire for fire alarm annunciators relocation. M) Provide as-builts of work performed. 24 Bullet - Resistant Products A) Provide bullet resistant products submittal data in accordance with Required Submittals on Sheet A0.3. B) Comply with Architectural Specifications on Sheet A0.6 for bullet-resistant fiberglass panels, door and frame assembly and transaction windows. C) Provide bullet resistant fiberglass panels. D) Install bullet resistant fiberglass panels in locations noted on Sheets A2.1 and in conformance with dimensions on Sheet A2.3. E) Provide bullrt-resistant transaction windows in accordance with Window Schedule and associated Notes and Remarks on Sheet A2.01. F) Install bullet resistant transaction windows with associated hardware in locations noted on Sheets A2.1 and in conformance with dimensions on Sheet A2.3. Installation shall kup. include frame and/or support members. - Scope of Work - 5 of 7 CENTENNIAL CONTRACTORS ENTERPRISES INC. -Scope of Work- G) Provide bullet resistant wood door and metal frame in accordance with Door Schedule and associated Notes and Remarks on Sheet A2.01. H) Install bullet resistant doors, frames and associated hardware in locations noted on Sheets A2.1 and in conformance with dimensions on Sheet A2.3. End of Base Bid 25 Value Engineering A) Remove ceramic tile from room P06 Records. B) Prep floor surface for new covering. C) Furnish and install carpet and vinyl wall base in room P06 Records. 26 NOT INCLUDED IN THIS PROPOSAL: (NIC) A) Permits/Fees B) Testing and inspection fees - Sheet A0.5 Section J C) As-builts on transparent prints - Sheet M3.1 Section C D) Plan check fees and permits - Sheet E4.1 General Electrical Notes #3 and #7 27 SUBMITTALS/ Submittals will be provided for the following: A) Steel Doors and Frames B) Wood Doors C) Aluminum Frames (Store Front) D) Finish Hardware E) Glass & Glazing F) Gypsum Drywall & Systems G) Tile (Floor) H) Acoustical Tile Ceilings I) Carpeting J) Painting K) Bullet Resistant Products L) Mechanical Equipment M) Electrical Equipment 28 QUALITY ASSURANCE / QUALITY CONTROL A) All materials and equipment shall be new unless specifically noted otherwise and approved by the owner. B) All materials shall be installed per manufacturer's instructions and all applicable codes, MESC JOC specifications and good work practices. C) Project safety shall be in compliance with Federal OSHA regulation and CCE's Heath and Safety Manual. D) House keeping will be accomplished on a daily basis. All debris and trash generated by this project becomes the property of the subcontractor and shall be removed from the confines of the job site for disposal in accordance with the applicable Federal, State and/or Local regulation, laws and restrictions. Nib Scope of Work - 6 of 7 CENTENNIAL CONTRACTORS ENTERPRISES INC. -Scope of Work - E) Each Subcontractor shall maintain at the project site copies of the MSDS information of the items being used by their craftsmen. Additional copies of these MSDS sheets shall be provided to CCE as required by the submittal list requirements. End of Scope • • - Scope of Work - 7 of 7 F - T ° v . C r,, N .q ... , , , >,_ to ‘i,„,_,„ s,-)) C) -x N -,-,-,t4 W !-‘t v, II,' 2N ;� co N z' ° N O O— to r- co E NTO E E to X • -)-(1), co __t W a W 2 co --^ , ::, * N ro ,,,, = OCo ON � O _ ' co 1: ; LLN Ay'. co fiM T a)r T i : : tototo >, >. toto >, Ntotototo >, >, AMto>, >. >. MtU >. >, tUCUCTUM13MM "p . CUCUMCaV 'O "0ttlMV V VT V V T V V V V T T r- V \� T T vN O toto to pp ti to N C7N N CD CD CD CD CO CD cO [D 1,1, CO CD CD CD CD cD CD tO SCD CO CO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O CO C") O T TCO CO _N N C) coN c, N O ` N N N N N N N NO W N � N N T r T TNN N N N N N N N0 0 c 7 N NE° aL C C C ) -0 a) C -C 'C a) C D 'C -C U ° a) a) .0 _ 7;19,",), to to O LI) to tintinto CD c0O CO CD (0 (0 CO tD CD c0 CD CO CD c0 CO t0 CD , _ 00 00 00000000000 00000000 O O O 0O 0 CD ' - t0 c0 ` 03 LI) 0 N C') C) Nt T T N N Q) N N CO 0 C7 CI) - N ,:'....J N N N C') T N N N N N N N N ; N N N NN N N N N N ` ` C7 C7 _ cc, - •- T T N N N N r- T T 0 0 N N N N N N N N N u) a) a) -0 0 T T T r- C C) O a) L .0 L = L C C 0 0 '0 'C m a) 0) a) a) 'v%- - > 0 a) L 0 Cl.) 0 'C 0 0 0 � F— F— F— F— 1— 0 0 L L Ll_ Lt_ 0 0 0 ^. , _ ..E L - F- F- F- F- F- F- U. H H � � F-- H F- H H 't,c;< - i �a ' ', p to a) L U U) U 3 (U ° N E E ° C CT o to 3 L_ ci V U O ° to ca, t,. m tin co a C (U C U > I Y 5 0 o O E E E rn u c`oa -a 8 o to ° o � co m ° Z 8 F- U) �_ 1-5 to o c to c n -17, _ E u o o U E 0 0 ° Y ow 3 o E o W ►- E o .n a) o L E 1] co— C O 1] L a a co -- c co L ° �a U W . E E to 0 -- m I— a) a) o a) E 3 Y o m > U Q to 0. E. o to ° Cn c Q' -- 8 o O m -3 cn o H a -- — c E i Z ° ° x. u) a o in u a) O t° a u) > to o a) -c 0 Z 2 ° -D -1 o u c a a_ Z '- 3 a) v = a U a) a) O 0 ° -) o -o cc T a co m 0 -- a) io 2 U 8 cn •- N F- ° 'cv L m o to 3 a) c a) a) a) c c to O a Z E a) U 0. o a) w >, m a a •� 2 E 0 ° > U 2 co c c . O a) Z o o _ _ a - a a E E' Q' ° ` D a) ° n) U a`i ,Z, H o o 0 0 0. CD a c rf c c a) Q .-, ,.. O H H c io to v a �_. L -c in a) a) F- ° 3 o co a '• E z o ?' ° E ° c ° o ro u) O O O cn 0. O Z U N ° a) O °o O n) > aci E' o ai 3 3 ami 0 0 Z co >N Y W 0. W (3 0 v) 0 0 to 0 0_ 0 Z 2 2 UO 5 0 0 o c CC 0 cn mO� 0 v O — N C') V in (0 N CO CJ) O — N C) v to tD N 00 CJ) O 'c'..) NN 2 N N CDN l'-.)-- °(:) O 2 O N a Q C_�_ r r N •t C_ co N N V r N CU R.72 til: N �/w_�� �i*?ECE ...1. il .,==. cc, ."�, ,sj vex =f CD `� u T� y n Cl_NI ..„.:::;, _____.,_ 2HI Aram: ..is X a W -_, al N 0) -T - /A rte. - 2C, - LL a, - N N C u, ►_ O to CO T ... CL _ O co ' a a n c P V V T -� a) a) a) o 0 0 in CC Cr Cr N T m N m� W T ^' 1 T a) / F1'ta y • [I a-- -ti N >. >' h CA N >' >, >' C) CA CA > >+ > >, co >. ?, H CQ C) C) V) N Cn CA Cn >, C) C C9 co >, >. >, CU ) > >, >. O 0 V ca C) CO V V V Co CO ) V Ca V Co Co Co Co >' >• > A >• ?. W V VV cQ C)0 v 0 c0 Co CO M CU V V V 0 (4 V c0 LY ") N . ^ N N N N N N CO CD Mc!) c' N N C'') cf) if) tt CD N- ‘- o c - Y ~ -.1CD cD ID CO COCD CD COCD CD co COCD cD COCD 'CD CD CD CD CD CD F— O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 OO p p O 0 O O O 0 O o CD et N CJ) 0 V' CY) C CO C) CD COO t7) if, O 't oo N co •.-- CD ,t- � N .-- Q1 C C D L M co co M M co CCC N N N C j cy CV e- N _O co C 'C C M a) O M M .0 O M M C') C M C'7 O ,t Nt C C C "t '� .4' to E a) LL. O a) O .c •C a) LL. O c it 1cx = F- F- LL F- 0 a) t-- 2 LL a) F-- -C -O 2 O a) 2 2 O F- a) LL , 0 CD CD CD CD o CD CO CD CD CO 0O CO CD CD CD CD CD CD _ o 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD CD 0 CD CD 0 0 CD) o - C') CD Z., CD CO 0 V' M CD M 4 CD N N 0 0 OD CO c) N N co 0 0 - .0 M co c') co M ..,--„.7 .0 c'') M C'') -_-......7 .- Z--- N_ E.'," _� T S..\-1. c•-.1. in T c'') t` O U) C C C C p M C C C t') c') co co co �f �t �t .� co `� if) _ co L) O 0 0 a) 'C C LL 0 LL a) 7 •` C- D Z1) co a) - ►� ,� LL Imo- F- LLFD H F— i•-- _C I— _ Y C N C SC C C 2 a.U) Z 2 .a O 2 0 U 2 H Co a LL H -0 LL ZD a 0 _ z o F- C) O O m 0 Z a 0cr D O -- a 0 a� a C) cr) N m a Z _J 0 F— m O Q -� Z Z Z J T C U 0 U Et O C _O O Z U Q o Z (� W _C F- O -� Z LL' J 0 O F- 0 ct () 3 C 'CO W J Z _U a 4) u) _ cfl o O Q Q f-- Q v- N J Z u) W m z' c0 o O ., Q Q i- CD E Q O z a Q lU 0 w w O _ O < 0 p — a Q ? w 0 F__ O —o Z cc 0 _ a W ) w >- o w a 0 F-- Z O a W _J w >N LL a LL U 2 W LL cn m 2 0 LL 0 0 U. W cn 2 w cn 2.-- 0 co O O c H o U v 2 co r-, T N C') ..- CO CD N Co O0 N )C" •cf CO CDN 00 0) O .-- N c') .7. CO CD N Cn CA O` Co CO C''') CO C') C') CY) C'') C~) M '[t Nt V V V' 'I V- ,I. `1. V. CO V) CO LC) CO CO CO CO CO CO a Centennial Contractors 44t r,,,, Enterprises,Inc. Ili:WA k... PROPOSAL - BASE BID including V.E. Option CCE Mohave Contract #: 04E-CENT-0901 Date: January 23, 2006 CCE# 68-0195 Title: Oro Valley Police Dept. Remodel Location: Oro Valley Burdened Means Cost: $ 123,748 Non-Prepriced: $ - Design Services $ - Bond $ 947 Sales Tax @ 0.06240 $ 7,704 Total Proposal Cost: $ 132,399 Proposal Data Calculation: Total Means Cost $ 165,110 11. Coefficient 0.83 $ 28,069 City Index 0.903 $ 13,293 Burdened Means Cost $ 123,748 Total Performance Time required: 91 Calendar Days after notice to proceed. Progress Payments shall apply to this proposal for work in place and stored materials CENTENNIAL CONTRACTORS ENTERPRISES, Inc. )1 1,,at,}4.01) Gary parrow Project General Manager liar 3925 E.29th Street 520/298-7350 Office Suite 404 520/298-7355 Fax Tucson,AZ 85711 68-0195 Records VE 2005` Facilities Cost Data 2005 BURDENED DETAILED ALL FIELDS REPORT Creation Date:Jan 19, 2006 Page 001 Report Date:Jan 23, 2006 PROJECT : Oro Valley Police Dept. Remodel LOCATION : Oro Valley ARCH/ENGR : Barnes OWNER : Town of Oro Valley QUANTITIES BY: plans ENTERED BY : DE DESCRIPTION : Base Bid including VE - Lobby & Records TYPE . 1110WEL 2 : 5 Temporary Facilities & Controls LEVEL 1 : 01 General Requirements DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT LINE NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB ASSEMBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP WBS LEVELS NOTES Office, storage boxes, 20' x 8', rent per month GC Ea. 01520 500 1250 000 M 4.000 OM 0.000 0.000 81.95 0.00 0.00 81.95 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.000 327.80 0.00 0.00 327.80 material storage, 2ea for 2 month Scaffold, rolling towers, incl wheels, railings, up to 21' hi, rent/mo Ea. 01540 755 4400 000 M 4.000 OM 0.000 0.000 174.90 0.00 0.00 174.90 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.000 699.60 0.00 0.00 699.60 Demo, DW, ACT, Elec Fencing, 11 ga, chain link, 6' high L.F. 01560 250 0100 000 M 120.000 CLAB2M 300.000 0.053 4.93 2.36 0.00 7.29 100.00 100.00 100.00 6.400 591.36 283.20 0.00 874.56 _ _ _ _ temp fence around dumpster & storage Sign, hi-intensity reflectorized, no posts, buy S.F. 01580 700 0010 000 M 16.000 OM 0.000 0.000 18.04 0.00 0.00 18.04 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.000 288.64 0.00 0.00 288.64 _ _ _ _ Required safety equipment Rent concrete & terrazzo grinder, electric floor* Floor Day 01590 100 1600 000 M 1.000 B1 M* 1.000 24.000* 18.48* 1088.52 0.00* 1107.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 24.000* 18.48 1088.52 0.00 1107.00 I Rent truck flatbed laxle 3 ton rating DFH Day 01590 200 5500 000 M 1.000 M 0.000 0.000 66.66* 160.80* 100.65* 328.11 50.00 50.00 100.00 0.000 66.66 160.80 100.65 328.11 _ Material delivery Rent truck flatbed laxle 3 ton rating ACT Day 01590 200 5500 001 M 1.000 M 0.000 0.000 66.66* 160.80* 100.65* 328.11 50.00 50.00 100.00 0.000 66.66 160.80 100.65 328.11 Delivery of material Rent truck flatbed laxle 3 ton rating Day 01590 200 5500 002 M 1.000 M 0.000 0.000 66.66* 160.80* 100.65* 328.11 50.00 50.00 100.00 0.000 66.66 160.80 100.65 328.11 material delivery - grinder Rent truck flatbed laxle 3 ton rating Day 01590 200 5500 003 M 1.000 M 0.000 0.000 66.66* 160.80* 100.65* 328.11 50.00 50.00 100.00 0.000 66.66 160.80 100.65 328.11 material delivery - carpet Rent truck flatbed laxle 3 ton rating Day 01590 200 5500 004 M 1.000 M 0.000 0.000 66.66* 160.80* 100.65* 328.11 50.00 50.00 100.00 0.000 66.66 160.80 100.65 328.11 _ _ material delivery - drywall Rent truck flatbed laxle 3 ton rating Mech Day 01590 200 5500 005 M 1.000 M 0.000 0.000 66.66* 160.80* 100.65* 328.11 50.00 50.00 100.00 0.000 66.66 160.80 100.65 328.11 Material delivery Rent toilet portable chemical Week 01590 400 6410 000 M 8.000 M 0.000 0.000 4.84* 0.00* 58.30* 63.14 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.000 38.72 0.00 466.40 505.12 Rented toilet for 8 weeks Rent toilet portable chemical GC Week 01590 400 6410 001 M 8.000 M 0.000 0.000 4.84* 0.00* 58.30* 63.14 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.000 38.72 0.00 466.40 505.12 _ _ _ Rented hand wash for 8 weeks oo-u.iyn xecorcis VE 200 Facilities Cost Data 2005 BURDENED DETAILED ALL FIELDS REPORT Creation Date:Jan 19, 2006 Page 002 Report Date:Jan 23, 2006 LEVEL 2 : 5 Temporary Facilities & Controls LEVEL 1 : 01 General Requirements DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT TE NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB EMBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP ndS LEVELS NOTES 5 Temporary Facilities & Controls SUB TOTALS : 30 2403 2337 1537 6277 0 LEVEL 2 : 7 Execution Requirements LEVEL 1 : 01 General Requirements DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT LINE NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB ASSEMBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP WBS LEVELS NOTES CLEANING UP After job completion, allow, Maximum* Floor % 01740 500 0040 000 C 0.010 0.000 0.000 0.00 122807.72* 0.00 122807.72 66.66 100.00 100.00 0.000 0.00 1228.08 0.00 1228.08 _ __ _ _ _ 122820 * .01=1228.20 Cleanup of floor area, continuous, per day, during const. M.S.F. 01740 500 0052 000 M 50.000 A5 iM 16.000 1.125 1.87 49.69 2.21 53.78 100.00 100.00 100.00 56.250 93.50 2484.69 110.69 2688.87 _ _ _ Clean up 1250 SF for 40 days 7 Execution Requirements SUB TOTALS : 56 94 3713 111 3917 0 LEVEL 2 : 8 Facility Operation LEVEL 1 : 01 General Requirements DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT LINE NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB -EMBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP LEVELS NOTES Sweep and damp mop concrete floor Floor M.S.F. 01832 230 1080 000 M 0.500 CLAB1M 20.000 0.400 1.53 17.70 0.00 19.23 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.200 0.76 8.85 0.00 9.61 8 Facility Operation SUB TOTALS : 0 1 9 0 10 0 01 General Requirements LVL TOTALS : 87 2498 6058 1647 10203 0 LEVEL 2 : 2 Site Preparation LEVEL 1 : 02 Site Construction DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT LINE NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB ASSEMBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP WBS LEVELS NOTES Cutout demo, walls, drywall to 5/8" thick DW Ea. 02220 310 6100 000 M 20.000 CLAB1M 24.000 0.333 0.00 14.75 0.00 14.75 100.00 100.00 100.00 6.667 0.00 295.00 0.00 295.00 __ Cutout Doors, windows, ann panel, rec's, etc Rubbish handling, dumpster, 20 C.Y. cap., (8 Tons), rent/week, 1 dump/ Elec Week 02220 350 0725 000 M 8.000 OM 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 440.00* 440.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.000 0.00 0.00 3520.00 3520.00 _ _ _ _ 1 @ 8 wk vv-.,.s.,, i.d,uiu. VL ZUUD reacilities Cost Data 2005 BURDENtD DETAILED ALL FIELDS REPORT Creation Date:Jan 19, 2006 Page 003 Report Date:Jan 23, 2006 LEVEL 2 : 2 Site Preparation LEVEL 1 : 02 Site Construction DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT -NE NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB EMBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP 3 LEVELS NOTES Rubbish handling, dumpster, 40 c.y cap.(13 Tons), rent/wk, 1 dump/wk GC Week 02220 350 0840 000 M 2.000 OM 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 805.00* 805.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.000 0.00 0.00 1610.00 1610.00 _ _ _ _ _ 1 B 2 wk Rubbish handling, load, haul and dump, 100' haul Mech C.Y. 02220 350 2040 000 M 10.000 CLAB2M 16.500 0.970 0.00 42.91 0.00 42.91 100.00 100.00 100.00 9.697 0.00 429.09 0.00 429.09 Handle salvage materials Rubbish handling, load, haul and dump, 100' haul Floor C.Y. 02220 350 2040 001 M 3.750 CLAB2M 16.500 0.970 0.00 42.91 0.00 42.91 100.00 100.00 100.00 3.636 0.00 160.91 0.00 160.91 2 Site Preparation SUB TOTALS : 20 0 885 5130 6015 0 LEVEL 2 : 5 Utility Services LEVEL 1 : 02 Site Construction DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT LINE NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB ASSEMBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP WBS LEVELS NOTES Elec & tel sitewk, nylon polyethylene pull rope, 1/4" L.F. 02580 420 9960 000 M 150.000 ELEC2M 2000.000 0.008 0.11 0.50 0.00 0.61 100.00 100.00 100.00 1.200 16.50 75.18 0.00 91.68 _ _ _ _ Pull string for cam conduits _ility Services SUB TOTALS : 1 17 75 0 92 0 02 Site Construction LVL TOTALS : 21 17 960 5130 6107 0 LEVEL 2 : 0 USER SUBDIVISION LEVEL 1 : 05 Metals DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT LINE NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB ASSENBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP WBS LEVELS NOTES Bolts & hex nuts, steel, A307, 3/8" diameter, 3" long Mech Ea. 05090 150 0800 000 M 8.000 SSWK1M 120.000 0.067 0.20 4.73 0.00 4.92 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.533 1.58 37.81 0.00 39.40 Eq hanger Bolts & hex nuts, steel, A307, 1/2" diameter, 1-1/2" long Mech Ea. 05090 150 1100 000 M 8.000 SSWK1M 120.000 0.067 0.23 4.73 0.00 4.96 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.533 1.85 37.81 0.00 39.66 Steel drilling, 1/4" dia x 1/4" deep, incl layout & bit, excl anchor ACT Ea. 05090 340 1920 000 M 102.500 SSWK1M 112.000 0.071 0.12 5.06 0.00 5.19 100.00 100.00 100.00 7.321 12.40 519.09 0.00 531.49 Drill out rivets from existing suspension system edge angle Steel drilling, 1/2" dia x 1/4" deep, incl layout & bit, excl anchor Mech Ea. 05090 340 1940 000 M 4.000 SSWK1M 96.000 0.083 0.15 5.91 0.00 6.06 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.333 0.62 23.63 0.00 24.25 _ Eq hanger 00-V1,3 necoius or. zuuJ racilities Lost uata 2uun BURDENED DETAILED ALL FIELDS REPORT Creation Date:Jan 19, 2006 Page 004 Report Date:Jan 23, 2006 LEVEL 2 : 0 USER SUBDIVISION LEVEL 1 : 05 Metals DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT TE NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB :MBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP ..-,S LEVELS NOTES Steel drilling, 1/2" dia x 1/4" deep, incl layout & bit, excl anchor Mech Ea. 05090 340 1940 001 M 10.000 SSWR1M 96.000 0.083 0.15 5.91 0.00 6.06 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.833 1.54 59.08 0.00 60.62 _ Drilling and supports/braces for attachment Machine screws, steel, round head, #10 x 1" long Mech C 05090 500 0200 000 M 2.000 OM 0.000 0.000 3.57 0.00 0.00 3.57 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.000 7.15 0.00 0.00 7.15 Duct hanger 0 USER SUBDIVISION SUB TOTALS : 10 25 677 0 703 0 LEVEL 2 : 1 Structural Metal Framing LEVEL 1 : 05 Metals DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT LINE NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB ASSEMBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP WBS LEVELS NOTES Lightweight framing, angle, field fab, 1.5" x 1.5" x 3/16" Mech L.F. 05120 440 0468 000 M 12.000 E3 iM 100.000 0.240 1.04 17.31 0.89 19.25 100.00 100.00 100.00 2.880 12.54 207.76 10.72 231.02 _ _ _ _ _ Angle brace for secuirng fan to structure Lightweight framing, angle, field fab, 2.5" x 2.5" x 1/4" Mech L.F. 05120 440 0472 000 M 6.000 E3 1M 72.000 0.333 2.36 24.05 1.24 27.65 100.00 100.00 100.00 2.000 14.19 144.28 7.44 165.91 Angle supports for new fan cructural Metal Framing SUB TOTALS : 5 27 352 18 397 0 LEVEL 2 : 9 Metal Restoration & Cleaning LEVEL 1 : 05 Metals DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT LINE NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB ASSEMBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP WBS LEVELS NOTES Steel surface treatment, wire brush, power tool (SSPC-SP3) Mech S.F. 05910 500 6180 000 M 11.000 PSST1M 600.000 0.013 0.05 0.80 0.00 0.86 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.147 0.60 8.82 0.00 9.43 _ _ _ _ Clean steel angle for prime paint Strl st projs,pnts&ctg,sprayd,zinc rich prmr,self cure,spray,inorganic Mech S.F. 05950 650 7000 000 M 11.000 PSST2M 1800.000 0.009 0.56 0.53 0.00 1.10 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.098 6.17 5.88 0.00 12.05 Prime paint steel angle 9 Metal Restoration & Cleaning SUB TOTALS : 0 7 15 0 22 0 05 Metals LVL TOTALS : 15 59 1044 18 1121 0 oo-uis Recoras VE 2005 Facilities Cost Data 2005 BURDENED DETAILED ALL FIELDS REPORT Creation Date:Jan 19, 2006 Page 005 Report Date:Jan 23, 2006 LEVEL 2 : 0 USER SUBDIVISION LEVEL 1 : 06 Wood & Plastics DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT F NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/0 M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB fMBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP ..-_,S LEVELS NOTES Millwork & trim demo, cabinets, wood, base cabinets, per L.F. L.F. 06052 120 1000 000 M 27.000 CLAB2M 80.000 0.200 0.00 8.85 0.00 8.85 100.00 100.00 100.00 5.400 0.00 238.95 0.00 238.95 Cabinet removal Millwork & trim demo, cabinets, wood, wall cabinets, per L.F. Demo L.F. 06052 120 1020 000 M 23.000 CLAB2M 80.000 0.200 0.00 8.85 0.00 8.85 100.00 100.00 100.00 4.600 0.00 203.55 0.00 203.55 Wall cabinet removal Millwork & trim demo, counter top, minimum, maximum Demo L.F. 06052 120 1510 000 M 31.000 CLAB2M 120.000 0.133 0.00 5.90 0.00 5.90 100.00 100.00 100.00 4.133 0.00 182.90 0.00 182.90 Counter top removal Sheet metal screws, self-drilling, with washers, #10 x 3/4", plain DW C 06090 700 1800 000 M 5.000 OM 0.000 0.000 6.71 0.00 0.00 6.71 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.000 33.55 0.00 0.00 33.55 Timber connectors, framing anchor, 2 or 3 dimensional, 10 ga, no nails DW Ea. 06090 800 1100 000 M 188.000 CARP1M 175.000 0.046 0.51 2.59 0.00 3.10 100.00 100.00 100.00 8.594 95.13 487.73 0.00 582.85 0 USER SUBDIVISION SUB TOTALS : 23 129 1113 0 1242 0 LEVEL 2 : 1 Rough Carpentry LEVEL 1 : 06 Wood & Plastics -_-CRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT km,0NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB • LY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP WBS LEVELS NOTES Blocking, miscellaneous, to steel construction, 2" x 8" DW M.B.F. 06110 100 2780 000 M 0.125 CARP1M 0.210 38.095 682.00 2161.90 0.00 2843.90 100.00 100.00 100.00 4.762 85.25 270.24 0.00 355.49 1 Rough Carpentry SUB TOTALS : 5 85 270 0 356 0 06 Wood & Plastics LVL TOTALS : 28 214 1383 0 1597 0 LEVEL 2 : 2 Thermal Protection LEVEL 1 : 07 Thermal & Moisture Protection DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT LINE NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB ASSEMBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP WBS LEVELS NOTES Blown-in insul, clgs, with open access, mineral wool, 4" thick, R12 S S.F. 07210 150 2000 000 M 347.000 G4 1M 3500.000 0.007 0.20 0.31 0.07 0.58 100.00 100.00 100.00 2.379 68.71 107.92 23.58 200.20 Building paper, polyethylene vapor barrier, std, .010" thick Sq. 07260 100 1200 000 M 12.000 CARP1M 37.000 0.216 5.61 12.27 0.00 17.88 100.00 100.00 100.00 2.595 67.32 147.24 0.00 214.56 For protection of carpet, cabinets and dust barriers for demo 4 00-ui xecoras vs 2uu:i Facilities Cost Data 2005 BURDENED DETAILED ALL FIELDS REPORT Creation Date:Jan 19, 2006 Page 006 Report Date:Jan 23, 2006 LEVEL 2 : 2 Thermal Protection LEVEL 1 : 07 Thermal & Moisture Protection DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT -E NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB EMBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP ...i5 LEVELS NOTES Building paper, polyethylene vapor barrier, std, .010" thick Demo Sq. 07260 100 1200 001 M 12.000 CARP1M 37.000 0.216 0.00* 6.14* 0.00 6.14 50.00 100.00 100.00 2.595 0.00 73.62 0.00 73.62 _ reduce mat to $0 / labor @ 50% for dust protection removal 2 Thermal Protection SUB TOTALS : 8 136 329 24 488 0 LEVEL 2 : 9 Joint Sealers LEVEL 1 : 07 Thermal & Moisture Protection DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT LINE NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB ASSEMBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP WBS LEVELS NOTES Caulking & sealants, acrylic latex caulk, white, 1/4"xl/2" Paint L.F. 07920 800 0500 000 M 325.000 BRIC1M 248.000 0.032 0.16 1.85 0.00 2.01 100.00 100.00 100.00 10.484 53.62 600.20 0.00 653.83 Caulking and sealants, butyl based, bulk, 1/2" x 1/2", 77 L.F./gal. S L.F. 07920 800 1800 000 M 73.000 BRIC1M 180.000 0.044 0.32 2.54 0.00 2.86 100.00 100.00 100.00 3.244 23.29 185.74 0.00 209.03 9 Joint Sealers SUB TOTALS : 14 77 786 0 863 0 Thermal & Moisture Protection LVL TOTALS : 21 213 1115 24 1351 0 LEVEL 2 : 0 USER SUBDIVISION LEVEL 1 : 08 Doors & Windows DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT LINE NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB ASSEMBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP WBS LEVELS NOTES Door demo, doors, interior, 1-3/8" thick, single, 3' x 7' high Demo Ea. 08060 110 0500 000 M 7.000 CLAB1M 20.000 0.400 0.00 26.55 0.00 26.55 150.00 100.00 100.00 2.800 0.00 185.85 0.00 185.85 Removal of existing doors/ add 50% labor for salvage demo Door demo, doors, interior, 1-3/8" thick, double, 6' x 7' high Demo Ea. 08060 110 0520 000 M 1.000 CLAB1M 16.000 0.500 0.00 22.13* 0.00 22.13 150.00 100.00 100.00 0.500 0.00 22.13 0.00 22.13 _ _ Removal of existing doors/ add 50% labor for salvage demo Door demo, frames, including trim, metal Demo Ea. 08060 110 2000 000 M 8.000 CARP1M 8.000 1.000 0.00 56.75* 0.00 56.75 150.00 100.00 100.00 8.000 0.00 454.00 0.00 454.00 Removal of existing door frames/ add 50% labor for salvage demo 0 USER SUBDIVISION SUB TOTALS : 11 0 662 0 662 0 vo-u17a tNeCUZus V. Luu7 racilities Cost Data 2005 BURDENED DETAILED ALL FIELDS REPORT Creation Date:Jan 19, 2006 Page 007 Report Date:Jan 23, 2006 LEVEL 2 : 1 Metal Doors And Frames LEVEL 1 : 08 Doors & Windows DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT 'E NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB e.MBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP ,.aS LEVELS NOTES Door frs,st chans W/ahr&bar stops,6" chan @ 8.2#/LF,3'x7' dr,wt 150# DFH Ea. 08110 250 0100 000 M 5.000 E4 1M 13.000 2.462 0.00* 176.81 6.87 183.68 100.00 100.00 100.00 12.308 0.00 884.05 34.35 918.41 Reinstall door frames; labor only 1 Metal Doors And Frames SUB TOTALS : 12 0 884 34 918 0 LEVEL 2 : 2 Wood And Plastic Doors LEVEL 1 : 08 Doors & Windows DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT LINE NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB ASSEMBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP WBS LEVELS NOTES Wood door, arch fl, int, 5 ply particle core, oak face, 3'-0" x 7'-0" DFH Ea. 08210 900 2280 001 M 5.000 CARP2M 13.000 1.231 0.00* 69.85 0.00 69.85 100.00 100.00 100.00 6.154 0.00 349.23 0.00 349.23 Reinstall salvaged doors; labor only Wood dr,arch,fl,int,5 ply core,4'-0"x6'-8",for prefinishing,stain,add DFH Ea. 08210 900 2740 000 M 1.000 OM 0.000 0.000 46.75 0.00 0.00 46.75 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.000 46.75 0.00 0.00 46.75 2 Wood And Plastic Doors SUB TOTALS : 6 47 349 0 396 0 41',1;:L 2 : 3 Specialty Doors LEVEL 1 : 08 Doors & Windows DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT LINE NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB ASSEMBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP WBS LEVELS NOTES Counter doors, manual, incl fr & hardware, aluminum, 6' H x 4' L DFH Opng. 08330 130 2100 000 M 1.000 CARP2M 2.000 8.000 0.00* 454.00 0.00 454.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 8.000 0.00 454.00 0.00 454.00 Labor only to demo for salvage 3 Specialty Doors SUB TOTALS : 8 0 454 0 454 0 LEVEL 2 : 4 Entrances And Storefronts LEVEL 1 : 08 Doors & Windows DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT LINE NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB ASSEMBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP WBS LEVELS NOTES Alum door, coml entr, mdm style, no glazing,std hdw,pr of 3'-0"x7'-0" S Pr. 08410 120 2200 000 M 1.000 CARP2M 1.700 9.412 1375.00 534.12 0.00 1909.12 100.00 100.00 100.00 9.412 1375.00 534.12 0.00 1909.12 4 Entrances And Storefronts SUB TOTALS : 9 1375 534 0 1909 0 00-ulxecoras VE 2005'Facilities Cost Data 2005 BURDENED DETAILED ALL FIELDS REPORT Creation Date:Jan 19, 2006 Page 008 Report Date:Jan 23, 2006 LEVEL 2 : 7 Hardware LEVEL 1 : 08 Doors E. Windows DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB .MBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP s LEVELS NOTES Electronic door opener, dble swing incl motion sens, motor, 12V box ADA Opng. 08710 100 1500 000 M 1.000 SKWK2M 0.500 32.000 5857.50 1824.00 0.00 7681.50 100.00 100.00 100.00 32.000 5857.50 1824.00 0.00 7681.50 Door closer, backcheck & adj pwr, top face mount, all sizes, reg arm DFH Ea. 08710 300 2800 000 M 1.000 CARP1M 6.500 1.231 179.30 69.85 0.00 249.15 100.00 100.00 100.00 1.231 179.30 69.85 0.00 249.15 Deadlocks, mortise, heavy duty, outside key, double cylinder S Ea. 08710 320 0020 000 M 1.000 CARP1M 9.000 0.889 150.70 50.44 0.00 201.14 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.889 150.70 50.44 0.00 201.14 Doorstops, holder E. bumper, floor or wall DFH Ea. 08710 340 0010 000 M 8.000 CARP1M 32.000 0.250 32.45 14.19 0.00 46.64 100.00 100.00 100.00 2.000 259.60 113.50 0.00 373.10 Hinge, full mortise, high freq, steel base, 4.5" x 4.5", US26D DFH Pr. 08710 520 1040 000 M 1.500 OM 0.000 0.000 54.45 0.00 0.00 54.45 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.000 81.67 0.00 0.00 81.67 Lockset, heavy duty with sectional trim, keyed, single cyl function DFH Ea. 08710 650 1400 000 M 1.000 CARP1M 10.000 0.800 191.40 45.40 0.00 236.80 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.800 191.40 45.40 0.00 236.80 Panic device, narrow stile, rim mounted, touch bar, exit only S Ea. 08710 750 3600 000 M 2.000 CARP1M 4.000 2.000 764.50 113.50 0.00 878.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 4.000 1529.00 227.00 0.00 1756.00 -pull, door pull, designer style, cast aluminum, maximum S Ea. 08710 780 5000 000 M 2.000 CARP1M 8.000 1.000 341.00 56.75 0.00 397.75 100.00 100.00 100.00 2.000 682.00 113.50 0.00 795.50 Special hinges, continuous hinge, steel,full mortise, heavy duty 501-8 L.F. 08710 800 9000 000 M 7.000 CARP2M 64.000 0.250 11.88 14.19 0.00 26.07 100.00 100.00 100.00 1.750 83.16 99.31 0.00 182.47 _ _ 7 linear foot of hinge per door Astragals,2 PC ovlapping astragal,extd alum rtnr,snap on cov,pile insr S L.F. 08720 100 5090 000 M 7.000 CARP1M 60.000 0.133 6.54 7.57 0.00 14.11 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.933 45.81 52.97 0.00 98.78 Weatherstripping, threshold ws, door sweep, flush mtd, alum S Ea. 08720 300 3650 000 M 2.000 CARP1M 25.000 0.320 12.26 18.16 0.00 30.42 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.640 24.53 36.32 0.00 60.85 Bronze, panic threshold, 5" wide, 1/2" thick Ea. 08720 800 0600 000 M 2.000 CARP1M 12.000 0.667 62.70 37.83 0.00 100.53 100.00 100.00 100.00 1.333 125.40 75.67 0.00 201.07 7 Hardware SUB TOTALS : 48 9210 2708 0 11918 0 05-U1b Records VE 2005`Facilities Cost Data 2005 BURDENED DETAILED ALL FIELDS REPORT Creation Date:Jan 19, 2006 Page 009 Report Date:Jan 23, 2006 LEVEL 2 : 9 Glazed Curtain Wall LEVEL 1 : 08 Doors & Windows DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT T. NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB J1BLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP waS LEVELS NOTES Wdw wl,dbl glzd acous wdw for airports,W/1"thk gl W/2"x4-1/2"tube FR S.F. 08910 900 1220 000 M 347.000 H2 1M 40.000 0.600 68.75 30.13 0.00 98.88 100.00 100.00 100.00 208.200 23856.25 10455.11 0.00 34311.36 9 Glazed Curtain Wall SUB TOTALS : 208 23856 10455 0 34311 0 08 Doors & Windows LVL TOTALS : 303 34488 16046 34 50569 0 LEVEL 2 : 0 USER SUBDIVISION LEVEL 1 : 09 Finishes DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT LINE NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB ASSEMBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP WBS LEVELS NOTES Ceiling dml, suspended ceiling, on suspension system, incl system Demo S.F. 09060 110 1250 000 M 587.000 CLAB2M 1200.000 0.013 0.00 0.59 0.00 0.59 100.00 100.00 100.00 7.827 0.00 346.33 0.00 346.33 Flooring demo, carpet, bonded, including surface scraping Demo S.F. 09060 120 0400 000 M 757.000 CLAB2M 2000.000 0.008 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.35 100.00 100.00 100.00 6.056 0.00 267.98 0.00 267.98 Flooring demo, resilient, VCT, 12" x 12" Demo S.F. 09060 120 0900 000 M 253.000 CLAB2M 1000.000 0.016 0.00 0.71 0.00 0.71 100.00 100.00 100.00 4.048 0.00 179.12 0.00 179.12 Flooring dml, tile, ceramic, mud set Demo S.F. 09060 120 2020 000 M 360.000 CLAB2M 625.000 0.026 0.00 1.13* 0.00 1.13 150.00 100.00 100.00 9.216 0.00 407.81 0.00 407.81 Remove existing tile from new reception area/ add 50% labor for salvag Walls & partitions demo, met or wood studs, fin 2 sides, plasbd (drywa Demo S.F. 09060 130 2300 000 M 1891.000 B1 1M 520.000 0.046 0.00 2.09 0.00 2.09 100.00 100.00 100.00 87.277 0.00 3958.43 0.00 3958.43 _ __ _ _ _ Demo existing walls 0 USER SUBDIVISION SUB TOTALS : 114 0 5160 0 5160 0 LEVEL 2 : 1 Metal Support Assemblies LEVEL 1 : 09 Finishes DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT LINE NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB ASSEMBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP WBS LEVELS NOTES Metal std, non-load brg, galv, 12' high, 20 ga. std, 3-5/8" W, 16" O.0 DW S.F. 09110 100 3200 000 M 1130.000 CARP1M 321.000 0.025 0.81 1.41 0.00 2.23 100.00 100.00 100.00 28.162 919.82 1598.19 0.00 2518.01 Metal std, non-load brg, galv, 12' high, 20 Ga. std, 6" wide, 16" o.c. DW S.F. 09110 100 3240 000 M 322.000 CARP1M 313.000 0.026 1.14 1.45 0.00 2.59 100.00 100.00 100.00 8.230 368.37 467.05 0.00 835.42 00-uiss xecoras vs 2005 Facilities Cost Data 2005 BURDENED DETAILED ALL FIELDS REPORT Creation Date:Jan 19, 2006 Page 010 Report Date:Jan 23, 2006 LEVEL 2 : 1 Metal Support Assemblies LEVEL 1 : 09 Finishes DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT E NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB IBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP naS LEVELS NOTES Furring, susp clgs, 1-1/2" carr, 24" o.c. W/:, 7/8" chans, 16" o.c. DW S.F. 09120 100 8300 000 M 128.000 LATH1M 165.000 0.048 0.47 2.41 0.00 2.89 100.00 100.00 100.00 6.206 60.54 308.75 0.00 369.30 _ _ _ _ Used for removal/replacement of (2) 4 x 8 section of framing at soffit Suspension systems for boards E. tile, class A, 15/16" T bar, 2' x 2' g ACT S.F. 09130 100 0300 000 M 509.000 CARP1M 650.000 0.012 0.67 0.70 0.00 1.37 100.00 100.00 100.00 6.265 341.54 355.52 0.00 697.06 Suspension systems, hanging wire, 12 ga, 4' long DW C.S.F. 09130 100 1040 000 M 0.640 CARP1M 65.000 0.123 •5.77 6.98 0.00 12.76 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.079 3.70 4.47 0.00 8.17 _ _ New hanger wire for removed/replaced gyp ceiling system Suspension systems, for bds and tile, hanging wire, 12 Ga., 8' long ACT C.S.F. 09130 100 1080 000 M 5.090 CARP1M 65.000 0.123 11.60 6.98 0.00 18.59 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.626 59.07 35.55 0.00 94.62 Suspension systems, for bds and tile, hanging wire, 12 Ga., 8' long Mech C.S.F. 09130 100 1080 001 M 0.080 CARP1M 65.000 0.123 11.60 6.98 0.00 18.59 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.010 0.93 0.56 0.00 1.49 _ Hanger wire for ceiling mounted supply/return air devices 1 Metal Support Assemblies SUB TOTALS : 50 1754 2770 0 4524 0 LEVEL 2 : 2 Plaster & Gypsum Board LEVEL 1 : 09 Finishes -CRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB £MBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP WBS LEVELS NOTES Accessories, cnr bead, expanded bullnose, 3/4" radius, #10, galv ACT C.L.F. 09205 700 1620 000 M 4.500 LATH1M 2.600 3.077 30.80 153.08 0.00 183.88 100.00 100.00 100.00 13.846 138.60 688.85 0.00 827.45 _ _ _ _ _ Install new perimeter supporting closure angle Accessories, cnr bead, expanded bullnose, 3/4" radius, #10, galv ACT C.L.F. 09205 700 1620 001 M 4.500 LATH1M 2.600 3.077 0.00* 153.08* 0.00 153.08 150.00 100.00 100.00 13.846 0.00 688.85 0.00 688.85 Remove exist perimeter supporting closure angle/lab @ 150% for careful Drywall,gyp plasbd,nailed/scrd to std,5/8"thk,on wl,fire res,taped&fin DW S.F. 09250 700 2150 000 M 3041.000 CARP2M 965.000 0.017 0.31 0.94 0.00 1.25 100.00 100.00 100.00 50.421 936.63 2861.38 0.00 3798.00 Drywl,gyp plasbd,nail/scrd,5/8"thk,on bms/col/soffit,fire res,tape&fin DW S.F. 09250 700 3650 000 M 104.000 CARP2M 475.000 0.034 0.35 1.91 0.00 2.26 100.00 100.00 100.00 3.503 36.61 198.80 0.00 235.41 Drywall, for work over 8' high, add DW S.F. 09250 700 5200 000 M 1004.000 CARP2M 3060.000 0.005 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.30 100.00 100.00 100.00 5.250 0.00 297.92 0.00 297.92 _ _ _ _ _ 1/3 drywall qty Drywall, for textured spray, add DW S.F. 09250 700 5270 000 M 2339.000 LATH2M 1600.000 0.010 0.04 0.50 0.00 0.54 100.00 100.00 100.00 23.390 102.92 1163.65 0.00 1266.57 __ .� ♦p,,,ili{..lOJ `V...6. LM,41 LUU.., PU,XLE.AALL 1JL1t,1L.0 rt,i,ttr ir.i uo Kr.ru cr creation Date:Jan 19, 2006 Page 011 Report Date:Jan 23, 2006 LEVEL 2 : 2 Plaster & Gypsum Board LEVEL 1 : 09 Finishes DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT NE NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB EMBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP .S LEVELS NOTES Drywall, for finishing inner corners, add DW L.F. 09250 700 5350 000 M 203.000 CARP2M 950.000 0.017 0.08 0.96 0.00 1.03 100.00 100.00 100.00 3.419 15.63 194.03 0.00 209.66 Drywall, for finishing outer corners, add DW L.F. 09250 700 5355 000 M 190.000 CARP2M 1250.000 0.013 0.19 0.73 0.00 0.91 100.00 100.00 100.00 2.432 35.53 138.02 0.00 173.55 High abuse gypsum board, 5/8" thick, on ceiling, level 5finish DW S.F. 09250 800 0570 000 M 104.000 CARP2M 550.000 0.029 0.70 1.65 0.00 2.35 100.00 100.00 100.00 3.025 73.22 171.69 0.00 244.91 _ _ _ _ Sally port soffit repairs Drywall, for high ceilings, over 8' high, add DW S.F. 09250 800 1000 000 M 104.000 CARP2M 2750.000 0.006 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.33 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.605 0.00 34.34 0.00 34.34 Sally port soffit repairs Accessories, corner bead, galvanized steel, 1-1/4" x 1-1/4" DW C.L.F. 09270 100 0400 000 M 3.930 CARP1M 3.500 2.286 22.00 129.71 0.00 151.71 100.00 100.00 100.00 8.983 86.46 509.78 0.00 596.24 Accessories, screws #6 x 1" a, #6 x 1-5/8" a DW M 09270 100 1170 000 M 1.000 OM 0.000 0.000 10.28 0.00 0.00 10.28 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.000 10.28 0.00 0.00 10.28 Gypsum wallboard repairs, fill and sand, dents, up to 2" square DW Ea. 09280 100 0120 000 M 60.000 CARP1M 48.000 0.167 0.01 9.46 0.00 9.47 100.00 100.00 100.00 10.000 0.66 567.50 0.00 568.16 .B. repairs, cut square, patch, sand and finish, holes, up to 2" sq DW Ea. 09280 100 0140 000 M 2.000 CARP1M 12.000 0.667 0.02 37.83 0.00 37.86 100.00 100.00 100.00 1.333 0.04 75.67 0.00 75.71 G.W.B. repairs, cut square, patch, sand and finish, holes, 2" to 4" sq DW Ea. 09280 100 0150 000 M 2.000 CARP1M 11.000 0.727 0.07 41.27 0.00 41.34 100.00 100.00 100.00 1.455 0.13 82.55 0.00 82.68 G.W.B. repairs, cut square, patch, sand and finish, holes, 4" to 8" sq DW Ea. 09280 100 0160 000 M 2.000 CARP1M 10.000 0.800 0.18 45.40 0.00 45.58 100.00 100.00 100.00 1.600 0.35 90.80 0.00 91.15 G.W.B. repair, cut square, patch, tape and finish holes, 8" to 12" squ DW Ea. 09280 100 0170 000 M 2.000 CARP1M 8.000 1.000 0.34 56.75 0.00 57.09 100.00 100.00 100.00 2.000 0.68 113.50 0.00 114.18 Drywl,min labor/equip charge DW Job 09280 100 9000 000 M 1.000 CARP1M 2.000 4.000 0.00 227.00 0.00 227.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 4.000 0.00 227.00 0.00 227.00 _ _ _ _ _ retape and texture seam in sallyport Drywl,min labor/equip charge DW Job 09280 100 9000 001 M 1.000 CARP1M 2.000 4.000 0.00 227.00 0.00 227.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 4.000 0.00 227.00 0.00 227.00 Add drywall at double door for offset Drywl,min labor/equip charge DW Job 09280 100 9000 002 M 1.000 CARP1M 2.000 4.000 0.00 227.00 0.00 227.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 4.000 0.00 227.00 0.00 227.00 _ _ _ _ Patch wall @ demo'ed doors VV'V17, iN.,,lU.7 Y.. LVV.) ea1:111 XUS LUSO Lata LOUD buttp.ra:L DETAILED ALL FIELDS REPORT Creation Date:Jan 19, 2006 Page 012 Report Date:Jan 23, 2006 LEVEL 2 : 2 Plaster & Gypsum Board LEVEL 1 : 09 Finishes DESCRIPTION SEARCHI SEARCH2 UNIT 'E NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB NBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP ,. LEVELS NOTES 2 Plaster & Gypsum Board SUB TOTALS : 157 1438 8558 0 9996 0 LEVEL 2 : 3 Tile LEVEL 1 : 09 Finishes DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT LINE NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB ASSEMBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP WBS LEVELS NOTES Ceramic tile, cove base, 6" x 4-1/4" high, mud set Floor L.F. 09310 100 0900 000 M 32.000 D7 1M 100.000 0.160 3.13 7.29 0.00 10.43 100.00 100.00 100.00 5.120 100.32 233.34 0.00 333.66 Ceramic tile, floors, porcelain type, for random blend, 2 colors, add Floor S.F. 09310 100 3350 001 M 12.000 OM 0.000 0.000 0.87 0.00 0.00 0.87 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.000 10.43 0.00 0.00 10.43 32 if x 0.375 = 12 sf Ceramic tile, floors, porcelain type, for abrasive non-slip tile, add Floor S.F. 09310 100 3380 001 M 12.000 OM 0.000 0.000 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.49 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.000 5.94 0.00 0.00 5.94 32 if x 0.375 = 12 sf Ceramic tile, walls, for tile set in portland cement mortar, add Floor S.F. 09310 100 7300 001 M 12.000 D7 1M 290.000 0.055 0.00 2.51 0.00 2.51 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.662 0.00 30.17 0.00 30.17 32 if x 0.375 = 12 sf L.le SUB TOTALS : 6 117 264 0 380 0 LEVEL 2 : 5 Ceilings LEVEL 1 : 09 Finishes DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT LINE NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB ASSEMBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP WBS LEVELS NOTES Susp acst clg bds, mnrl fbr lay-in, 2x2 or 2x4, 5/8"T,rough textured ACT S.F. 09510 700 1115 000 M 637.000 CARP1M 625.000 0.013 1.17 0.73 0.00 1.89 100.00 100.00 100.00 8.154 742.74 462.72 0.00 1205.46 Susp acst clg bds, mnrl fbr lay-in, 2x2 or 2x4, 5/8"T,rough textured ACT S.F. 09510 700 1115 001 M 820.000 CARPIM 625.000 0.013 0.00* 0.73* 0.00 0.73 150.00 100.00 100.00 10.496 0.00 595.65 0.00 595.65 Used to remove/protect & re-install existing tile/lab @ 150%/mat $0.00 5 Ceilings SUB TOTALS : 19 743 1058 0 1801 0 LEVEL 2 : 6 Flooring LEVEL 1 : 09 Finishes I VO-V17, .INULUluS V.C. LuuD rac111tles lost Data zuun bUkDENED DETAILED ALL FIELDS REPORT Creation Date:Jan 19, 2006 Page 013 Report Date:Jan 23, 2006 DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT LINE NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB ASSEMBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP LEVELS NOTES ,ilient,base,cove,rbr or vin, 1/8" thk,std colors,4" high Demo L.F. 09651 200 1500 000 M 311.000 TILF1M 315.000 0.025 0.00* 1.30* 0.00 1.30 50.00 100.00 100.00 7.898 0.00 405.58 0.00 405.58 Remove vinyl wall base, no matl. 50% labor Resilient,base,cove,rbr or vin, 1/8" thk,std colors,4" high Floor L.F. 09651 200 1500 001 M 305.000 TILF1M 315.000 0.025 0.77 1.30 0.00 2.07 100.00 100.00 100.00 7.746 234.85 397.76 0.00 632.61 Resilient, base, corners, 4" high Floor Ea. 09651 200 1630 000 M 20.000 TILF1M 315.000 0.025 1.34 1.30 0.00 2.65 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.508 26.84 26.08 0.00 52.92 Resilient, latex underlayment, liquid, fortified Floor Gal. 09653 100 8950 000 M 3.000 D7 M* 2.692 5.944* 36.30 270.90 0.00 307.20 100.00 100.00 100.00 17.832* 108.90 812.69 0.00 921.59 743 sf @ 250sf/gal =>3gal, Crew @ 0.008 hr/sf Resilient, vinyl composition tile, 1/8" thick, solid Floor S.F. 09658 100 7400 000 M 360.000 TILF1M 500.000 0.016 2.21 0.82 0.00 3.03 100.00 100.00 100.00 5.760 795.96 295.78 0.00 1091.74 Carpet, corn grs, direct cem, nylon, lvl loop, 32 oz., medium traffic Floor S.Y. 09680 800 0900 000 M 34.000 TILF1M 75.000 0.107 32.31* 5.48* 0.00 37.79 125.00 125.00 100.00 3.627 1098.62 186.23 0.00 1284.85 inc mat 25% per line 096808005000, inc labor 25% per line 096808005100 6 Flooring SUB TOTALS : 43 2265 2124 0 4389 0 LFVEL 2 : 9 Paints & Coatings LEVEL 1 : 09 Finishes DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT LINE NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB ASSEMBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP WBS LEVELS NOTES Door frames & trim, only, brushwork, exterior latex, finish coat Paint L.F. 09910 300 0120 000 M 88.000 PORD1M 512.000 0.016 0.07 0.77 0.00 0.83 100.00 100.00 100.00 1.375 5.81 67.51 0.00 73.32 Walls&clgs,conc/dry wl/plas,oil base,prmr/sealer CT,sand fin,brwk S.F. 09910 920 0300 000 M 336.000 PORD1M 975.000 0.008 0.05 0.40 0.00 0.46 100.00 100.00 100.00 2.757 18.48 135.36 0.00 153.84 Walls&clgs,conc/dry wl/plas,oil base,prmr/sealer CT,sand fin,brwk S.F. 09910 920 0300 001 M 382.000 PORD1M 975.000 0.008 0.05 0.40* 0.00 0.46 110.00 100.00 100.00 3.134 21.01 153.90 0.00 174.91 _ _ _ _ _ labor increased 10% per line 09910 920 8200 Walis&clgs,conc/dry wl/plas,oil base,prmr/sealer CT,sand fin,roller S.F. 09910 920 0340 000 M 2050.000 PORD1M 1150.000 0.007 0.05 0.34 0.00 0.40 100.00 100.00 100.00 14.261 112.75 700.21 0.00 812.96 Walls&clgs,conc/dry wl/plas,oil base,prmr/sealer CT,sand fin,roller S.F. 09910 920 0340 001 M 570.000 PORD1M 1150.000 0.007 0.05 0.34* 0.00 0.40 110.00 100.00 100.00 3.965 31.35 194.69 0.00 226.04 _ _ _ _ _ labor increased 10% per line 09910 920 8200 Walls&clgs,conc,dry wl or plas,oil base,pnt 1 coat,sand fin,roller S.F. 09910 920 0540 000 M 2790.000 PORD1M 1600.000 0.005 0.05 0.25 0.00 0.30 100.00 100.00 100.00 13.950 153.45 684.94 0.00 838.39 ��..� r.�v.r a........+.-.�.�..+ r�+�aaJ ua�u s11J iJ 1 11iLi/J •�t+r viler ,Leauxo. vaze:oan L , 2UUb Page 014 Report Date:Jan 23, 2006 LEVEL 2 : 9 Paints & Coatings LEVEL 1 : 09 Finishes DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT -NE NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB EMBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP LEVELS NOTES Walls&clgs,conc,dry wl or plas,oil base,pnt 1 coat,sand fin,roller S.F. 09910 920 0540 001 M 697.000 PORD1M 1600.000 0.005 0.05 0.25* 0.00 0.30 110.00 100.00 100.00 3.485 38.33 171.11 0.00 209.45 labor increased 10% per line 09910 920 8200 Walls&clgs,conc,dry wl or plas,oil base,pnt 2 coats,sand fin,brwk S.F. 09910 920 0900 000 M 336.000 PORD1M 605.000 0.013 0.10 0.65 0.00 0.75 100.00 100.00 100.00 4.443 33.26 218.15 0.00 251.41 1 Walls&clgs,conc,dry wl or plas,oil base,pnt 2 coats,sand fin,brwk S.F. 1 09910 920 0900 001 M 382.000 PORD1M 605.000 0.013 0.10 0.65* 0.00 0.75 110.00 100.00 100.00 5.051 37.82 248.02 0.00 285.83 labor increased 10% per line 09910 920 8200 Walls&clgs,conc,dry wl or plas,oil base,pnt 2 coats,sand fin,roller S.F. 09910 920 0940 000 M 1769.000 PORD1M 1020.000 0.008 0.11 0.39 0.00 0.50 100.00 100.00 100.00 13.875 194.59 681.24 0.00 875.83 Walls&clgs,conc,dry wl or plas,oil base,pnt 2 coats,sand fin,roller S.F. 09910 920 0940 001 M 570.000 PORD1M 1020.000 0.008 0.11 0.39* 0.00 0.50 110.00 100.00 100.00 4.471 62.70 219.51 0.00 282.21 _ _ _ _ labor increased 10% per line 09910 920 8200 VARNISH 1 coat + sealer, on wood trim, no sanding included Paint S.F. 09930 100 0010 000 M 252.000 PORD1M 400.000 0.020 0.08 0.98 0.00 1.06 100.00 100.00 100.00 5.040 19.40 247.46 0.00 266.87 sanding per line 09990 800 0100 VARNISH 1 coat + sealer, on wood trim, no sanding included Paint S.F. 09930 100 0010 001 M 252.000 PORD1M 400.000 0.020 0.08 0.98 0.00 1.06 100.00 100.00 100.00 5.040 19.40 247.46 0.00 266.87 Surface protection, placement and removal, basic drop cloths Paint S.F. 09990 800 0510 000 M 1623.000 PORD1M 6400.000 0.001 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.06 100.00 100.00 100.00 2.029 0.00 99.61 0.00 99.61 Surface protection, placement and removal, masking with paper Paint S.F. 09990 800 0520 001 M 553.000 PORD1M 800.000 0.010 0.03 0.49 0.00 0.52 100.00 100.00 100.00 5.530 18.25 271.52 0.00 289.77 9 Paints & Coatings SUB TOTALS : 88 767 4341 0 5107 0 09 Finishes LVL TOTALS : 477 7083 24275 0 31358 0 LEVEL 2 : 5 Lockers LEVEL 1 : 10 Specialties DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT LINE NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB ASSEMBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP WBS LEVELS NOTES Fire extinguishers, dry chem, std type, portable, painted, 5 lb Ea. 10525 300 1060 000 M 1.000 OM 0.000 0.000 66.00 0.00 0.00 66.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.000 66.00 0.00 0.00 66.00 _ _ required safety equipment 5 Lockers SUB TOTALS : 0 66 0 0 66 0 __ ____ ..__-___ ._ LEVEL 2 : 5 Lockers ..v..rvLGJ aica,u uvr,LL.,Vr.L LL.11S1LL+L 1]LL C 1LLL.7 rir,rvicl LEVEL 1 : 10 Specialties creation Date:Jan 19, 2006 Page 015 Report Date:Jan 23, 2006 DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT ' '.: NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB MBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP LEVELS NOTES 10 Specialties LVL TOTALS : 0 66 0 0 66 0 LEVEL 2 : 0 USER SUBDIVISION LEVEL 1 : 11 Equipment DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT LINE NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB ASSEMBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP WBS LEVELS NOTES Bank equipment, teller window, bullet resistant, selective demolition Demo Ea. 11006 100 0380 000 M 2.000 CLAB1M 1.200 6.667 0.00 442.50* 0.00 442.50 150.00 100.00 100.00 13.333 0.00 885.00 0.00 885.00 Removal of existing / add 50% labor for salvage demo Bank eqpt, bullet resistant teller window, 48" x 60" Ea. 11038 150 0500 000 M 2.000 GLAZ1M 0.600 13.333 3740.00 709.33 0.00 4449.33 100.00 100.00 100.00 26.667 7480.00 1418.67 0.00 8898.67 Bank equip, door and frame, bullet-resistant, with vision panel, maxim Ea. 11038 150 4700 000 M 1.000 SSWR2M 1.100 14.545 4977.50 1031.27 0.00 6008.77 100.00 100.00 100.00 14.545 4977.50 1031.27 0.00 6008.77 New door Bank equip, door and frame, bullet-resistant, with vision panel, maxim DFH Ea. 11038 150 4700 002 M 1.000 SSWK2M 1.100 14.545 0.00* 1031.27* 0.00 1031.27 150.00 100.00 100.00 14.545 0.00 1031.27 0.00 1031.27 Remove and reinstall existing door, labor at 150% Bank equipment, partitions, bullet-resistant, acrylic, to 8' H L.F. 9 150 5450 000 M 32.000 CARP2M 10.000 1.600 341.00 90.80 0.00 431.80 100.00 100.00 100.00 51.200 10912.00 2905.60 0.00 13817.60 Bullet resistant panels, 8 panels B 4' ea 0 USER SUBDIVISION SUB TOTALS : 120 23370 7272 0 30641 0 11 Equipment LVL TOTALS : 120 23370 7272 0 30641 0 LEVEL 2 : 7 Security Access And Surveillance LEVEL 1 : 13 Special Construction DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT LINE NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/0 M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB ASSEMBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP WBS LEVELS NOTES Detection systems, fire alarm control panel, 4 zone FA Ea. 13720 065 3600 000 M 2.000 ELEC2M 2.000 8.000 0.00* 501.20 0.00 501.20 100.00 100.00 100.00 16.000 0.00 1002.40 0.00 1002.40 Remove existing panels, 2 ea Detection systems, fire alarm control panel, 4 zone FA Ea. 13720 065 3600 001 M 2.000 ELEC2M 2.000 8.000 0.00* 501.20 0.00 501.20 100.00 100.00 100.00 16.000 0.00 1002.40 0.00 1002.40 Reinstall existing panels, 2 ea 7 Security Access And Surveillance SUB TOTALS : 32 0 2005 0 2005 0 00-01y> xecoras vh 200b Facilities Cost Data 2005 BURDENED DETAILED ALL FIELDS REPORT Creation Date:Jan 19, 2006 Page 016 Report Date:Jan 23, 2006 LEVEL 2 : 9 Fire Suppression LEVEL 1 : 13 Special Construction DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB IBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP W-- LEVELS NOTES Sprinkler sys, hds, dry, pendent, 1/2" orifice, 1/2" to 6" lg FP Ea. 13930 400 2660 000 M 4.000 SPRI1M 14.000 0.571 40.15 36.34 0.00 76.49 100.00 100.00 100.00 2.286 160.60 145.37 0.00 305:97 Sprinkler,hds,sidewall,horiz,brs,135< to 286<F,1/2" NPT,1/2" orifice FP Ea. 13930 400 4520 000 M 2.000 SPRI1M 16.000 0.500 7.42 31.80 0.00 39.22 100.00 100.00 100.00 1.000 14.85 63.60 0.00 78.45 9 Fire Suppression SUB TOTALS : 3 175 209 0 384 0 13 Special Construction LVL TOTALS : 35 175 2214 0 2389 0 LEVEL 2 : 0 USER SUBDIVISION LEVEL 1 : 15 Mechanical DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT LINE NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB ASSEMBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP WBS LEVELS NOTES Pipe hgrs & sprts, CLP, i-beam, strap iron, 2" flg size Mech Ea. 15060 300 0510 000 M 32.000 PLUM1M 96.000 0.083 4.86 5.29 0.00 10.15 100.00 100.00 100.00 2.667 155.58 169.20 0.00 324.78 _ Duct hanger Rods, carbon steel, continuous thread, 3/8" thread size Mech L.F. 15060 300 2680 000 M 12.000 PLUM1M 144.000 0.056 0.42* 3.53 0.00 3.94 100.00 140.00 100.00 0.667 4.99 42.30 0.00 47.29 Eq hanger, inc mat'l 40% per line 150603002730 Vibration absorbers, hangers, spring flex, 60 lb. capacity Mech Ea. 15070 800 0500 000 M 4.000 OM 0.000 0.000 20.90 0.00 0.00 20.90 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.000 83.60 0.00 0.00 83.60 _ _ _ _ _ Eq hanger Insul, ductwork, blanket type, fbgl, flex, 1 LB density, 1-1/2" thk S.F. 15080 200 3320 000 M 93.500 Q14 iM 330.000 0.048 0.49 2.64 0.00 3.13 100.00 100.00 100.00 4.533 46.28 246.43 0.00 292.71 Insul, ductwork, bd type, fbgl liner, 3 LB, bk pigmented, 1 side, 1" t S.F. 15080 200 3520 000 M 31.500 Q14 1M 150.000 0.107 1.58 5.80 0.00 7.38 100.00 100.00 100.00 3.360 49.90 182.65 0.00 232.55 0 USER SUBDIVISION SUB TOTALS : 11 340 641 0 981 0 LEVEL 2 : 1 Building Services Piping LEVEL 1 : 15 Mechanical DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT LINE NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB ASSEMBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP WBS LEVELS NOTES Pipe,stl,wldd, sch. 40, on yoke & roll hgrs, 10' o.c.,blk, 1" dia FP L.F. 15107 620 2040 000 M 55.000 Q15 1M 93.000 0.172 2.73 9.82 0.95 13.51 100.00 100.00 100.00 9.462 150.04 540.35 52.47 742.85 00-V173 xecoras V. LEVEL 2 : 1 Building Service�uu�s rPaciLi ipintgies cost Data 2UUS BURDENED DETAILED ALL FIELDS REPORT Creation Date:Jan 19, 2006 Page 017 LEVEL 1 15 Mechanical Report Date:Jan 23, 2006 DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT ' NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB MBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP huJ LEVELS NOTES Pipe,stl,wldd, sch. 40, on yoke & roll hgrs, 10' o.c.,blk, 1-1/4" dia FP L.F. 15107 620 2050 000 M 46.000 Q15 1M 84.000 0.190 3.53 10.88 1.06 15.46 100.00 100.00 100.00 8.762 162.43 500.35 48.58 711.36 Pipe, steel ftngs,xtra hvy weight,black, 90< elb, straight, 1" FP Ea. 15107 640 1540 000 M 8.000 PLUM1M 13.000 0.615 17.76 39.05 0.00 56.81 100.00 100.00 100.00 4.923 142.12 312.37 0.00 454.49 Pipe,stl,ftngs, xtra hvy weight, black, 90< elb, straight, 1-1/4" FP Ea. 15107 640 1550 000 M 1.000 Q1 1M 22.000 0.727 26.40 41.53 0.00 67.93 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.727 26.40 41.53 0.00 67.93 Pipe, steel fittings, CI, xtra heavy weight, black, tee, straight, 1" FP Ea. 15107 640 1830 000 M 2.000 PLUM1M 8.000 1.000 26.40 63.45 0.00 89.85 100.00 100.00 100.00 2.000 52.80 126.90 0.00 179.70 1 Building Services Piping SUB TOTALS : 26 534 1522 101 2156 0 LEVEL 2 : 8 Air Distribution LEVEL 1 : 15 Mechanical DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT LINE NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB ASSEMBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP WBS LEVELS NOTES r twork, fab rect, incls ftngs, jts, sprts, galv st, 200 to 500 lb. Mach Lb. ( 3 100 0520 000 M 200.000 Q10 iM 245.000 0.098 0.92 5.84 0.00 6.76 100.00 100.00 100.00 19.592 184.80 1167.54 0.00 1352.34 Duct, spiral preformed, stl, galv, straight lgs,8" dia,26 ga,maxl0"spw Mech L.F. 15810 100 5430 000 M 6.000 Q9 LM 200.000 0.080 1.78 4.60* 0.00 6.38 110.00 100.00 100.00 0.480 10.69 27.58 0.00 38.28 Extd duct for relocation of supply air, inc labor 10% per 158101001283 Duct, spiral preformed, stl, galv, straight lgs,10" dia,26 ga,max10"sp Mech L.F. 15810 100 5440 000 M 6.000 Q9 1M 160.000 0.100 2.20 5.75* 0.00 7.95 110.00 100.00 100.00 0.600 13.20 34.48 0.00 47.68 Extd duct for relocation of supply air, inc labor 10% per 158101001283 Ductwork,spl prefmd,st,PVC ctd bs,reg boot,elb or perim,12" duct dia Mech Ea. 15810 100 9740 000 M 1.000 Q9 1M 36.000 0.444 44.00 25.54* 0.00 69.54 110.00 100.00 100.00 0.444 44.00 25.54 0.00 69.54 New return air grille boot, inc labor 10% per 158101001283 Ductwork, flex, ctd fbgl fabric, insul, hvy dty, 8" dia Mech L.F. 15810 500 2600 000 M 24.000 Q9 1M 180.000 0.089 4.94 5.11* 0.00 10.05 110.00 100.00 100.00 2.133 118.54 122.59 0.00 241.13 Ext duct for relocation of supply air, inc labor 10% per 158105001283 Ductwork, flex, ctd fbgl fabric, insul, hvy dty, 10" dia Mech L.F. 15810 500 2640 000 M 6.000 Q9 iM 140.000 0.114 5.77 6.57* 0.00 12.34 110.00 100.00 100.00 0.686 34.65 39.40 0.00 74.05 Ext duct for relocation of supply air, inc labor 10% per 158105001283 Duct accessories, duct access door, insulated, 10" x 10" ACT Ea. 15820 300 1020 000 M 2.000 SHEE1M 11.000 0.727 18.59 46.44 0.00 65.03 100.00 100.00 100.00 1.455 37.18 92.87 0.00 130.05 ...... _-__ ......... ..q,.....1 p.7 �VS]6. y/OL ..u, DVl..,..., ..111.1LL.L .1,, ri.,.b rc.r:ruxT Creation Date:Jan 19, 2006 Page 018 • Report Date:Jan 23, 2006 LEVEL 2 : 8 Air Distribution LEVEL 1 : 15 Mechanical DESCRIPTION SEARCHI SEARCH2 UNIT NE NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB E24BLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP j LEVELS NOTES Duct accessories, fabrics for flexible connections, w/metal edge Mech L.F. 15820 300 2000 000 M 9.500 SHEE1M 100.000 0.080 1.78 5.11 0.00 6.89 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.760 16.93 48.53 0.00 65.45 Duct accessories, fire/smoke comb damper, louver type, UL, 10" x 10" Mech Ea. 15820 300 4580 000 M 2.000 SHEE1M 21.000 0.381 157.30 24.32 0.00 181.62 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.762 314.60 48.65 0.00 363.25 Thru fire wall Fans, in-line cntfgl, sply/exhaust, 500 CFM, 10" dia conn Mech Ea. 15830 100 0240 000 M 1.000 Q20 1M 3.000 6.667 990.00 390.01 0.00 1380.01 100.00 100.00 100.00 6.667 990.00 390.01 0.00 1380.01 Grilles, aluminum, air supply, single deflection, adj, 24" x 24" Mech Ea. 15850 500 0380 000 M 4.000 SHEE1M 15.000 0.533 0.00* 34.05 0.00 34.05 100.00 100.00 100.00 2.133 0.00 136.21 0.00 136.21 Relocate supply air register, labor only Grilles, aluminum, air return, 24" x 12" Mech Ea. 15850 500 1120 000 M 1.000 SHEE1M 18.000 0.444 45.65 28.38 0.00 74.03 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.444 45.65 28.38 0.00 74.03 _ _ _ _ _ New return air grille Grilles, aluminum, air return, 24" x 12" Mech Ea. 15850 500 1120 001 M 1.000 SHEE1M 18.000 0.444 0.00* 28.38 0.00 28.38 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.444 0.00 28.38 0.00 28.38 Relocate return air grille - labor only Grilles, aluminum, air return, 24" x 24" Mech Ea. 15850 500 1260 000 M 1.000 SHEE1M 15.000 0.533 71.50 34.05 0.00 105.55 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.533 71.50 34.05 0.00 105.55 _ _ _ _ Intake for in-line fan _les, aluminum, transfer grille, vision proof, 10" x 10" Mech Ea. io850 500 5080 000 M 2.000 SHEE1M 23.000 0.348 31.90 22.21 0.00 54.11 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.696 63.80 44.42 0.00 108.22 _ _ Soffit transfer grill Registers,air sply,clg/wall,OB dmpr,al,adj curved face bars,l0"x10" Mech Ea. 15850 700 1080 000 M 2.000 SHEE1M 19.000 0.421 35.20 26.88 0.00 62.08 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.842 70.40 53.77 0.00 124.17 Soffit supply registers 8 Air Distribution SUB TOTALS : 39 2016 2322 0 4338 0 LEVEL 2 : 9 HVAC Instrumentation & Controls LEVEL 1 : 15 Mechanical DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT LINE NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB ASSEMBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP WBS LEVELS NOTES Balancing,sub's quote incl matl&lab,sply/ret/exh,regs&diffs,avg ht clg Mech Ea. 15955 100 3000 000 M 14.000 OM 0.000 0.000 0.00 59.37* 0.00 59.37 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.000 0.00 831.18 0.00 831.18 9 HVAC Instrumentation & Controls SUB TOTALS : 0 0 831 0 831 0 15 Mechanical LVL TOTALS : 76 2890 5316 101 8307 0 VV-V1JJ ro,viv. vc. LVV:J ral.111LLes Lusk u.La zuuo burl .Nr.v Lr;'1'AiLr.L ALL IISL1)S REPORT Creation Date:Jan 19, 2006 Page 019 Report Date:Jan 23, 2006 LEVEL 2 : 9 HVAC Instrumentation & Controls LEVEL 1 : 15 Mechanical DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT ' NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB 4BLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP r,_ LEVELS NOTES LEVEL 2 : 0 USER SUBDIVISION LEVEL 1 : 16 Electrical DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT LINE NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB ASSEMBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP WBS LEVELS NOTES Electrical demo, conduit to 15' high, elec mtic tubing,l/2" to 1" Elec L.F. 16055 300 0200 000 M 1000.000 ELEC1M 394.000 0.020 0.00 1.27 o.ob 1.27 100.00 100.00 100.00 20.305 0.00 1272.08 0.00 1272.08 Demo EMT Conduit Electrical demo, pull boxes & cabs, junction boxes, 4" sq & oct Elec Ea. 16055 300 1720 000 M 27.000 ELEC1M 80.000 0.100 0.00 6.26 0.00 6.26 100.00 100.00 100.00 2.700 0.00 169.16 0.00 169.16 Demo J-boxes Electrical demo, pull boxes & cabs, junction boxes, 4" sq & oct Elec Ea. 16055 300 1720 001 M 2.000 ELEC1M 80.000 0.100 0.00 6.26 0.00 6.26 • 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.200 0.00 12.53 0.00 12.53 _ _ _ _ Demo Comm boxes Electrical demo, pull boxes & cabinets, switch box Elec Ea. 16055 300 1760 000 M 27.000 ELEC1M 107.000 0.075 0.00 4.68 0.00 4.68 100.00 100.00 100.00 2.019 0.00 126.47 0.00 126.47 _ Demo Rec & Sw boxes Electrical demo, pull boxes & cabs, receptacle & switch plates Elec Ea. 16055 300 1780 000 M 27.000 ELEC1M 257.000 0.031 0.00 1.95 0.00 1.95 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.840 0.00 52.66 0.00 52.66 Demo Rec & Sw plates :rical demo, pull boxes & cabs, recpts & switches, 15 to 30 amp Elec Ea. i 300 1790 000 M 29.000 ELEC1M 135.000 0.059 0.00 3.71 0.00 3.71 100.00 100.00 100.00 1.719 0.00 107.67 0.00 107.67 Demo Rec's & Sw's & Comm jacks Electrical demo, wire, THN-THWN-THHN, removed from, in place conduit, Elec C.L.F. 16055 300 1840 000 M 25.000 ELEC1M 55.000 0.145 0.00 9.11 0.00 9.11 100.00 100.00 100.00 3.636 0.00 227.82 0.00 227.82 Demo wiring Hangers, conduit supports, nuts, galvanized, 3/8" diameter Mech C 16070 320 3050 000 M 0.200 OM 0.000 0.000 16.06 0.00 0.00 16.06 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.000 3.21 0.00 0.00 3.21 Eq hanger Hangers, channels, steel, 1-1/2" x 1-1/2" Mech L.F. 16070 320 3900 000 M 8.000 ELEC1M 70.000 0.114 5.28 7.16 0.00 12.44 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.914 42.24 57.28 0.00 99.52 _ Eq hanger Hangers, channels, steel, 1-1/2" x 1-1/2" Mech L.F. 16070 320 3900 001 M 50.000 ELEC1M 70.000 0.114 5.28 7.16 0.00 12.44 100.00 100.00 100.00 5.714 264.00 358.00 0.00 622.00 _ _ _ _ Duct hanger Hangers, channels, 90< angle fitting 2-1/8" x 2-1/8" Mech Ea. 16070 320 5400 000 M 8.000 ELEC1M 60.000 0.133 2.17 8.35 0.00 10.52 100.00 100.00 100.00 1.067 17.34 66.83 0.00 84.16 _ _ _ _ _ Eq hanger Hangers, conduit hangers, with bolt & 12" rod, 1/2" diameter Ea. 16070 320 7820 000 M 20.000 ELEC1M 150.000 0.053 2.55 3.34 0.00 5.89 100.00 100.00 100.00 1.067 51.04 66.83 0.00 117.87 Special hangers for new conduits ect. -U17.J r.v.:vlu. VE. LUU, rde111L:iC5 LUSL Lata 2UUD bUttLt:N U DETAILED ALL FIELDS REPORT Creation Date:Jan 19, 2006 Page 020 Report Date:Jan 23, 2006 LEVEL 2 : 0 USER SUBDIVISION LEVEL 1 : 16 Electrical DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT TE NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB O{BLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP 11111 , LEVELS NOTES 0 USER SUBDIVISION SUB TOTALS : 40 378 2517 0 2895 0 LEVEL 2 : 1 Wiring Methods LEVEL 1 : 16 Electrical DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT LINE NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB ASSEMBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP WBS LEVELS NOTES Terminations, screw-on connectors, insulated, #14 to #8 Elec Ea. 16120 230 0040 000 M 96.000 ELEC1M 210.000 0.038 0.26 2.39 0.00 2.65 100.00 100.00 100.00 3.657 25.34 229.12 0.00 254.46 Wirenuts Special ws & ftngs, fire alarm FEP teflon 150 V to 200< C, #18, 1 pr Mech C.L.F. 16120 750 1850 000 M 0.800 ELEC1M 8.000 1.000 85.80 62.65 0.00 148.45 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.800 68.64 50.12 0.00 118.76 Interconnect wiring for smoke/fire dampers Wire, 600 volt, type THWN-THHN, copper, stranded, #10 Elec C.L.F. 16120 900 1250 000 M 7.500 ELEC1M 10.000 0.800 11.49 50.12 -0.00 61.61 100.00 100.00 100.00 6.000 86.21 375.90 0.00 462.11 Wire for doors, disconnect, ect. Wire, 600 volt, copper type XHHW, stranded, #12 Elec C.L.F. 16120 900 3020 000 M 21.000 ELEC1M 11.000 0.727 11.82 45.56 0.00 57.39 100.00 100.00 100.00 15.273 248.32 956.84 0.00 1205.16 New rec wire Conduit,to 15' H,incl 2 termn,2 elb&ll ban clp per 100',(EMT),1/2"dia Mech L.F. 1<132 205 5000 000 M 80.000 ELEC1M 170.000 0.047 0.69 2.95 0.00 3.64 100.00 100.00 100.00 3.765 55.44 235.86 0.00 291.30 Nis. _ _ _ _ Allow 40' run from each smoke/fire damper Conduit,to 15' H,incl 2 termn,2 elb&ll ban clp per 100',(EMT),1/2"dia Elec L.F. 16132 205 5000 001 M 750.000 ELEC1M 170.000 0.047 0.69 2.95 0.00 3.64 100.00 100.00 100.00 35.294 519.75 2211.18 0.00 2730.93 1/2" EMT for doors, lighting, rec's , ect. Conduit,to 15' H,incl 2 termn,2 elb&11 bm clp per 100',(EMT),3/4" dia Elec L.F. 16132 205 5020 000 M 350.000 ELEC1M 130.000 0.062 1.17 3.86 0.00 5.02 100.00 100.00 100.00 21.538 408.10 1349.38 0.00 1757.48 _ _ _ Conduit frown existing panels. Conduit,to 15' H,incl 2 termn,2 elb&11 ban clp per 100',(EMT), 1" dia Elec L.F. 16132 205 5040 000 M 150.000 ELEC1M 115.000 0.070 2.05 4.36 0.00 6.40 100.00 100.00 100.00 10.435 306.90 653.74 0.00 960.64 New Com conduits Flexible metallic conduit, steel, 1/2" dia Elec L.F. 16132 320 0100 000 M 375.000 ELEC1M 200.000 0.040 0.41 2.51 0.00 2.91 100.00 100.00 100.00 15.000 152.62 939.75 0.00 1092.37 1/2 flex for new rec's Outlet boxes, pressed steel, octagon, covers, blank Ea. 16136 600 0060 000 M 30.000 ELEC1M 64.000 0.125 0.84 7.83 0.00 8.67 100.00 100.00 100.00 3.750 25.08 234.94 0.00 260.02 New J-box covers Steel outlet box 4" square Elec Ea. 16136 600 0152 000 M 30.000 ELEC1M 18.000 0.444 2.35 27.84 0.00 30.20 100.00 100.00 100.00 13.333 70.62 835.33 0.00 905.95 New J-boxes k vv-vim,.., rdc;utu5 v.. zuuD iac:111Lie. LUSL Lata 4UUD sUALr.rt.i Lk,'1'AlLED ALL FIELDS REPORT Creation Date:Jan 19, 2006 Page 021 Report Date:Jan 23, 2006 LEVEL 2 : 1 Wiring Methods LEVEL 1 : 16 Electrical DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT "E NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB MBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP ._.x,; LEVELS NOTES Outlet boxes, pressed steel, square, 4", for romex or BX, with brkt Elec Ea. 16136 600 0170 000 M 21.000 ELEC1M 20.000 0.400 5.47 25.06 0.00 30.53 100.00 100.00 100.00 8.400 114.81 526.26 0.00 641.07 New boxes for Rec's Outlet boxes, pressed steel, square, 4", for romex or BX, with brkt Elec Ea. 16136 600 0170 001 M 34.000 ELEC1M 20.000 0.400 5.47 25.06 0.00 30.53 100.00 100.00 100.00 13.600 185.88 852.04 0.00 1037.92 _ _ _ _ 4" boxes for copier, doors, lighting, etc Outlet boxes, pressed steel, square, 2-1/8" deep, 1" KO Elec Ea. 16136 600 0220 000 M 20.000 ELEC1M 20.000 0.400 4.47 25.06 0.00 29.53 100.00 100.00 100.00 8.000 89.32 501.20 0.00 590.52 New Comm boxes Outlet boxes, pressed steel, square, 4", plaster rings Elec Ea. 16136 600 0300 000 M 41.000 ELEC1M 64.000 0.125 1.85 7.83 0.00 9.68 100.00 100.00 100.00 5.125 75.77 321.08 0.00 396.85 Plaster rings for wall boxes Wiring devices, toggle switch, quiet type, single pole, 20 amp Elec Ea. 16140 910 0500 000 M 8.000 ELEC1M 27.000 0.296 7.86 18.56 0.00 26.43 100.00 100.00 100.00 2.370 62.92 148.50 0.00 211.42 light Sw's Wiring devices, toggle switch, 3 way, 20 amp Elec Ea. 16140 910 0800 000 M 2.000 ELEC1M 18.000 0.444 8.63 27.84 0.00 36.48 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.889 17.27 55.69 0.00 72.96 _ _ _ _ 3way Sw's Wiring devices, receptacle, duplex, 120 volt, ground, 20 amp Elec Ea. 16140 910 2470 000 M 42.000 ELEC1M 27.000 0.296 9.40 18.56 0.00 27.97 100.00 100.00 100.00 12.444 395.01 779.64 0.00 1174.65 New rec's Ang devices, wall plates, stainless steel, 2 gang Elec Ea. 16140 910 2800 000 M 21.000 ELEC1M 53.000 0.151 4.51 9.46 0.00 13.97 100.00 100.00 100.00 3.170 94.71 198.59 0.00 293.30 New rec walll plates Motor conns, flexible cnd and ftngs, 115 volt, 1 ph, up to 1 HP mot Elec Ea. 16150 275 0020 000 M 1.000 ELEC1M 8.000 1.000 5.46 62.65 0.00 68.11 100.00 100.00 100.00 1.000 5.46 62.65 0.00 68.11 motor connection 1 Wiring Methods SUB TOTALS : 184 3008 11518 0 14526 0 LEVEL 2 : 4 Low-Voltage Distribution LEVEL 1 : 16 Electrical DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT LINE NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB ASSEMBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP WBS LEVELS NOTES Safety switch, heavy duty, 600 V, 3 pole NEMA 1, nonfused, 30 A Elec Ea. 16410 800 1110 000 M 1.000 ELEC1M 3.200 2.500 122.10 156.63 0.00 278.72 100.00 100.00 100.00 2.500 122.10 156.63 0.00 278.72 Disconnect for fan Panelboard&load center ckt brkr,bolt-on,10k AIC,120V,1 P,15 to 50A Elec Ea. 16440 700 0100 000 M 3.000 ELEC1M 10.000 0.800 12.10 50.12 0.00 62.22 100.00 100.00 100.00 2.400 36.30 150.36 0.00 186.66 New breakers 68-0195 Records VE 2005 Facilities Cost Data 2005 BURDENED DETAILED ALL FIELDS REPORT Creation Date:Jan 19, 2006 Page 022 Report Date:Jan 23, 2006 LEVEL 2 : 4 Low-Voltage Distribution LEVEL 1 : 16 Electrical nESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT "E NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB EMBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP IfirS LEVELS NOTES 4 Low-Voltage Distribution SUB TOTALS : 5 158 307 0 465 0 LEVEL 2 : 5 Lighting LEVEL 1 : 16 Electrical DESCRIPTION SEARCH1 SEARCH2 UNIT LINE NUMBER QUANTITY CREW D/O M/H MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP TOTAL SUB ASSEMBLY# PERLABOR PERMATL PEREQUIP WBS LEVELS NOTES Interior ltg fxtr, fluor, E.S. lamps, acryl lens, 2'w x 4'1, two 32 W Elec Ea. 16510 440 0940 000 M 16.000 ELEC1M 5.300 1.509 0.00* 94.57 0.00 94.57 100.00 100.00 100.00 24.151 0.00 1513.06 0.00 1513.06 _ Relocate existing fixtures - labor only Interior ltg fxtr, fluor, surf mtd, acryl lens, 2'w x 4'1, four 40 W Elec Ea. 16510 440 1500 000 M 2.000 ELEC1M 5.300 1.509 102.85 94.57 0.00 197.42 100.00 100.00 100.00 3.019 205.70 189.13 0.00 394.83 New fixtures Fixture whip, 3/8" greenfield, 2 conn, 6' L, THHN wire, three #12 Elec Ea. 16580 300 0360 000 M 13.000 ELEC1M 32.000 0.250 0.00* 15.66 0.00 15.66 100.00 100.00 100.00 3.250 0.00 203.61 0.00 203.61 Demo fixture whips - labor only Fixture whip, 3/8" greenfield, 2 conn, 6' L, THHN wire, three #12 Elec Ea. 16580 300 0360 001 M 18.000 ELEC1M 32.000 0.250 14.13 15.66 0.00 29.80 100.00 100.00 100.00 4.500 254.43 281.93 0.00 536.35 New fixture whips Lamps, fluorescent, rapid start, cool white, 4' long, 40 watt Elec C 16585 600 0100 000 M 1.000 ELEC1M 0.900 8.889 309.10 556.89 0.00 865.99 100.00 100.00 100.00 8.889 309.10 556.89 0.00 865.99 _ _ _ _ retube existing fixtures 5 Lighting SUB TOTALS : 44 769 2745 0 3514 0 16 Electrical LVL TOTALS : 273 4314 17087 0 21400 0 JOB TOTALS : 1456 75385 82770 6955 165110 0 .... ..v..v�..., .0 ..vv.,'Y u....i.1G►7 '...V.7, ✓Ga,. L.VVJ O..JlwLLar6L LL lA1LLL C1L1, t 1GLL.7 lNLrVri1 Lieecion Lace:ian a. , LUUb Page U23 Report Date:Jan 23, 2006 MATERIAL LABOR EQUIP SUB TOTAL TOTAL BEFORE MARK-UP 75385 82770 6955 0 165110 ES TAX 0.00% 0 :RIAL MARK-UP 0.00% 0 .OR MARK-UP 0.00% 0 EQUIPMENT MARK-UP 0.00% 0 SUBCONTRACTOR MARK-UP 0.00% 0 75385 82770 6955 0 165110 JOB TOTAL :BEFORE CONTINGENCY 165110 CONTINGENCY 0.00% 0 BOND 0.00% 0 JOB TOTAL :CONTINGENCY AND BOND INCLUDED $ 165110 COEFFICIENT 0.8300 $ -28069 JOB TOTAL :COEFFICIENT INCLUDED $ 137041 CCI MARK-UP 0.903 -13293 CCI OPTION :Average STATE :USER ENTERED CCI CITY :TUCSON 3RD QRT JOB TOTAL :CCI MARK-UP INCLUDED $ 123748 uiiutieu vocument' Page 1 of 2 The History tr In 1971, the school districts in Mohave County joined in a cooperative to establish a career education program in response to state funding. The program was called the Mohave County Career Education Project. It provided local schools with career days, field trips to worksites, career fairs, and media related to the world of work. In 1980,the state changed the funding mechanism from discretionary grants to formula funding through the regular school budget. Of the dozen or so career projects then active in Arizona, only a handful survived this funding change. Because Mohave County Career Education had diversified into other programs (vocational grants, GED and ABE programs, computer science education, dropout prevention, Federal grant management, media library services, etc.), the schools in the county decided to keep the project alive. The name was changed to Mohave Educational Services Cooperative (or Mohave, for short) and was operated through the Mohave County School Superintendent's office. In 1981-82, Mohave introduced local schools to educational software through the Minnesota Educational Computer Consortium (MECC). Mohave County districts were saving money on software through the 41irp cooperative. When schools from other counties inquired if they too could be provided services, the Mohave County Attorney approved. The major restriction he placed upon our activity (based on ARS §15-365)was that the schools outside the county be willing to pay an administration fee that covered costs for providing services. Since that time, Mohave has actively promoted the improvement of education through the use of technology in the classroom. In Arizona, no state mechanism existed to provide specialized cooperative services needed by schools. For example, Arizona schools may purchase through state bid contracts, or they may issue bids and RFP's for items they need. Since the State Procurement Office seeks contracts for all state agencies rather than for schools many items needed by schools could not be found on state bid lists. To fill the need for statewide bids for school-related equipment and services, Mohave has used the sealed proposal bidding process to secure needed contracts for its members. Mohave follows the exact procedure the State or a local school district must use to issue a solicitation and to award a contract. Public procurement units then may order through Mohave using these contracts. This procedure saves local schools much time and money. Since Mohave seeks pricing for the entire state, vendors offer lower prices than they would on a single district contract. To be confident our contracts were legal, the Mohave County Attorney approved our solicitations. In addition, many county attorneys around the state have examined and approved our contracts for their schools. http://www.mesc.org/history.html 2/28/2000 - - --- - rage z of 2 In 1988, the Yuma County Attorney's Office prepared a sample Cooperative Purchase Agreement (CPA)to be signed by a school district and Mohave as a membership agreement. Today, a new CPA has been developed that Now reflects the expanded services of Mohave. The CPA establishes for auditors that a sealed solicitation was used for purchases. Mohave currently has over 620 CPAs. As a result of these contracts, members are able to purchase computers, software, and other education/technology items at great savings. Now, even the smallest school has the purchasing power of the entire state. Taxpayers are saving money (one of the best features of the Mohave is that it operates on user fees rather than being tax supported). By every member paying a one percent administration fee, Mohave funds itself. 2/1 8/00 What's New? Home I Contact I Si ,n--up I Contracts I ASPIN I Register Nor New http://www.mesc.org/history.html 2/28/2000 Mohave/Job Order Contracting Page 1 of } MOFIAVE DOR tNro '�CG��� � ¢ ':.:' •� .-.s:.Jl..a_.is .�-.�'\r',� _,i�4x ` �•': .. •..• :..,..t •' 8 kr«_. g. d':_` _:s= . - Et�.ti. • ,.-. ......vt:s_ ..-.....::' .. ... ....-uru:.._r..::..,-a v. _:. :...:. � w.+ '.41' ....•t� '>A :5... ... .._.-r:... ,-.,:..... ........: :._. �.x�... .. ..i:.. ..•.n,. ..;-' ..tar.:�`" - ,.a...- a'.. rZ:k7` �'�• ..............--.�.. .. -.....r:.v.r.-w}v. ........:.•wi ..W.. -.:.:. :-....v............Y. ... ... .sx y.. ..:'1 -SwTi. itr•+G i if �.2 ....?s... ..,.,,� ..,1.�+Y'. 3r`u�a -'rte }�,"�r' t k�r�v.a..�, kei��.;`��ri �.�a[...:��. .w.... ... ......'C t�,._a...<`�".Fr'.y�•....... t3i.._.>%Fi37[:.,a�_.:.4�::=i��;E��.^u.�';�J•F�0-`,- ...: :. ,._ .. ..,. ,.....e�'1..:..� k: �:... v. vr& ..1 - vvwri-rw. wrww^i1'�F'w�-vw'�Trv:iFr!:ums 4v.:M?!•'_vr�:.::.',+ "M'xr�-•R2:i�1[v'.IF tiw'!:iR'!v:-Yxt^<NAi�f�::.� * HOME PURCHASING SERVICES .. .. ... .-.....v. -.:..,....... .. - -_., ,. a...: ... ..�... ...N"...y..iv. 'fC`4-t:c er ..:fi• ice...: ..4 v..A! ...v'C...},. .:`Y.J.. YA.... T.-.. .a::-4n...S�'.- r: r.r.,..x.1�.- �.�'.`.. �.• .10r. ORIA-R CONTR CT1NG Mohave is pleased to offer contracts NT E N TS : to assist our members with minor construction, repair, rehabilitation, WHAT IS JOB ORDER CONTRACTING? dalteration of their r facilities ! WHO ARE" HE CONTRACTORS? 4 under Job Order Contracting. WHAT CAN THE CONTRACTORS 4 0 HOW ARE JOBS RILED? 0' ARE THERE ANY LIMITS UNDER JOC? For more Information on HOW MEMBERS USE JOC? Job Order Contracting, '10. WHERE DO WE GO FORI-iELP?please contact Tom Peeler, Purchasing Director,at Ilk CURRENT JOC 5 LiOTAtnONS { tom 'mesC:Ori. PREVIOUS IOC SOLICITATIONS Page Updated 7/19/04 WHAT IS JOB ORDER CONTRACTING? (Back to Contents) Job order contracting, or JOC, is an alternative project delivery method for construction services. Typical work will include minor construction, repair, rehabilitation, and alteration services. Under JOC, a master contract is established with standard specifications and pricing based upon a coefficient that is applied to a Unit Price Book (UPB). When a specific project, or job order, is issued, the member and the contractor agree on the scope and the cost is determined by applying the coefficient to the appropriate units in the UPB. Mohave has awarded several job order contracts. The contracts were awarded in compliance with the two-step competitive procurement process specified in the Arizona Revised Statutes. WHO ARE THE CONTRACTORS? (Back to Contents) 3D/International 01G-3D2-0831 General Contractor Contact: Ron Crawford (602)778-4410 Brown's Custom Fence 02D-BCF-0829 Fencing - Download* BROWN'S CUSTOM FENCE UPS `'` Contact: Roger Brown (602)243-0993 Centennial Contractors 01 G-CENT-0831 General Contractor http://mesc.org/joc.html 1/30/200 Ill,,,have/Job Order Contracting Page 2 of 41' Contact: Charles Bowers (602) 230-9987 (Phoenix)or Mark Baier (520)459-1050 (Fort Huachuca) Corbins Electric 01G-CORB-0831 Electrical-Division 16 Contact: Gary Kolpin (602)275-8500 Electrical Excellence 01G-ELEX-0831 Electrical-Division 16 Contact: Steve Barry (520) 622-0011 Kinetics Group 01G-KIN-0831 Mechanical- Division 15 Contact: Chad Halmrast (602)685-2092 Phoenix Fence Company 02D-PFC-0829 Fencing- Download It. PHOENIX FSE COMPANY LIPS Contact: Bryan Zeigler (602) 276-4283 SchoolCraft 01 G-CRAF4-0831 Bleacher Installation/Repair Contact: Stella Burke (800)423-3092 WHAT CAN THE CONTRACTORS DO? (Back to Contents) General contractors can perform all construction services. Division awards (mechanical, electrical, fence and bleachers) limit contractors to construction services listed in their awarded divisions. The general guide for allowable work will be the current RS MEANS Facilities Construction Cost Data (MEANS). Each division in MEANS lists a number of construction tasks, services and commodities. The contractor can provide any item listed in an awarded division. For the fencing contracts, the guide will be the fence Unit Price Book. Contractors may perform ancillary services outside of awarded divisions, if required to complete a covered project. If an electrical contractor installs outlets in a room, he may also perform the work necessary to patch or repair the wall around the new outlets. A mechanical contractor may run power to a new air handler. However, the mechanical contractor may not install new electrical outlets just because he is already on the job. The key to acceptable ancillary work is that the work be a minor part of completing a project. Contracting for convenience outside the scope of an award is not acceptable. If they were offered in the proposal, a contractor may also provide professional services such as architects, engineers, etc. HOW ARE JOBS PRICED? _(Back to Contents) Each job is priced in accordance with costs in the Unit Price Book (UPB). The contractor and member determine the scope of the project. The contractor determines the UPB line items required for the project and the quantity of each line item. The quantity for each line item is multiplied by the applicable unit price. Finally, a coefficient (i.e., .82) is multiplied against the grand total of all individual line item costs. This is the project cost. Professional services, if requested, are charged in addition to project cost. Some required construction services might not be listed in UPB. The contract contains provisions for pricing and adding those services. http://mesc.org/joc.html 1/30/200 Mct)have/Job Order Contracting Page 3 of ARE THERE ANY LIMITS UNDER JOC? Back to Contents No single JOC project may exceed $750,000. The Arizona Revised Statutes specify that no project shall be artificially divided to avoid the single project limit. Members should carefully consider the scope of each project to ensure it does not exceed the single project cost cap. HOW DO MEMBERS USE JOC? (Back to Contents) Contact the contractor. Meet with the contractor and determine the scope of the project. Obtain a detailed quote from the contractor. The quote should provide a list of UPB line items, line item quantities, line item unit prices, extended line item costs, total cost before coefficient, and total cost after application coefficient. Obtaining a detailed quote will help ensure the project was priced correctly. Note: The Performance and Payment Bond requirements that are applicable to other construction purchasing also apply to JOC. Prepare a purchase order for Mohave and attach the contractor's detailed quote. Mohave uses the quote to verify that the job was priced in accordance with the contract. Failure to attach the quote will delay the project. Mohave issues a purchase order to the contractor. Contractor begins work on the project, after the contractor receives Mohave's purchase order. Starting the project before Mohave issues its purchase order is a violation of the contract and may result in termination of the contract. Contractor invoices Mohave for completed work. Larger projects may require progress payments. Decide on progress payments prior to issuing your purchase order to Mohave. Make a note on the purchase order if progress payments will be used. Mohave confirms contractor's invoice amount and invoices the member. When progress payments are used, it will be the member's responsibility to confirm that the work for each payment application is complete. Member pays Mohave's invoice. Pay promptly. Certain statutory timelines apply to payments made on construction projects. Mohave pays the contractor. http://mesc.org/joc.html 1/fin/inn ........._........... 4 Mohave/Job Order Contracting Page 4 of WHERE DO WE GO FOR HELP? (Back_to Contents) Contract questions: Tom Peeler, 928-718-3205 or tom@mesc.org; Craig McKee, 928-718-3201 or craig©mesc.org; Mark DiBlasi, 928-718-3220 or mark@mesc.org. Purchase order and invoice questions: John Baril, 928-718-3224 or john@mesc.org. Rev. 10/21/02, JTP Current-J C Solid vs I-, PDF&Word Format Request for Proposal 04E-0813 (Job Order Contracting) Responses must be received in the Kingman office of Mohave Educational Services Cooperative, 625 E. Beale Street, Kingman, AZ 86401 no later than Friday, August 13, 2004, at 4:30 p.m. (MST). Please note: Only contractors who successfully advanced under the qualifications stage (RFQ 04E-0604) may respond to this RFP. PDF Format(Download both documents): RFP 04E-0813 Job Order Contracting(PDF,approx.630 KB) RFP 04E-0813 Attachment 1 (Specifications for the Work)(PDF,approx.2.7 MB) Word Format(Download both documents): RFP 04E-0813 Job Order Contracting(Word,approx.510 KB) RFP 04E-0813 Attachment 1 (Specifications for the Work)(Word,approx.1.6 MB) P.i '' t Sokci• ti r gusJQC okiefok Downies4 ;,,,,, , PDF Format Only Solicitations are listed by year, in the order they were released: 2004 SOLICITATION . RFQ 04E-0604 Download RFQ 04E (approx. 1 MB) Job Order Contracting for Various Construction Trades 2002 SOLICITATION RFQ/RFP 02D-0829 Download RFQ/RFP 02D (approx. 1.1 MB) Job Order Contracting for Various Types of Fencing 2001 SOLICITATION http://mesc.org/joc.html 1/10/700 I' have/Job Order Contracting Page 5 of I RFQ/RFP 01G-0831 Do_wnloadRFQ/RFP 01G (approx.2.7 MB) 1)Job Order Contracting for Various Construction Trades (G - General Contractor, 15 - Mechanical (HVAC) Contractor, 16 - Electrical Contractor) 2)Job Order Contracting for Indoor Telescoping Bleachers (11a - Bleachers Contractor) (Back to Contents) y.^....i ;_. o::. ..: ..:.:r::.+;:-„.r- ^>+ -,f..:`,.:.f,.c.c::C: ,_",;'-- .*4+:ti'Y7"w:,.w-#,^ve :+i-::a,er..a.. -.-,.f .a.. ...1.-. w♦ h::. +Y. if-you have any uestions about downioadin a coftract pleas contact Ctalgc jtrac is Manager,ag r,at craly@mescorg. GENERAL INFORMATION CONTACT US I itt, LINKS http://mesc.org/joc.html 1/30/200 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: MARCH 1, 2006 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: AINSLEY ANNE REEDER, PARKS & RECREATION ADMINISTRATOR SUBJECT: PROGRESS REPORT: DEVELOPMENT OF A DRAFT POLICY BY THE PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD FOR DONATIONS TO THE TOWN AND NAMING RIGHTS OPPORTUNITIES SUMMARY: On December 7, 2005, the Town Council directed the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board (PRAB) to develop a draft policy regarding donations to the Town and the authorization of naming rights. At their January 10, 2006, PRAB designated a sub-committee to work on this assignment. The sub-committee met on January 24, 2006 and February 7, 2006. To date the work group has gathered data from over six different agencies with similar policies. Additionally, the group has discusses the basic parameters for the draft policy and considerations to keep in mind as they move forward. The sub-committee plans to have the data collection completed by February 24, 2006. On March 14, 2006 they will begin the process of drafting the policy. The sub-committee plans to have a draft ready for the full PRAB to review in April, 2006. It is anticipated that PRAB will forward the final draft to the Town Council for consideration in May, 2006. Parks & Recreation Adniimstrator 1141(7 /12 De ment Head Assistant Town Ma. er /4( Town Manage dr TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: March 1, 2006 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & TOWN COUNCIL FROM: Scott Nelson, Special Projects Coordinator SUBJECT: SOUTHWEST PLANNING AREA FEASIBILITY STUDY STATUS SUMMARY: At the October 5, 2005 Town Council meeting the Council directed the Town Manager to conduct a feasibility study and fiscal impact analysis of the Southwest Planning area and to report results of that study to Council by the end of February 2006. Since that direction from Council, staff has conducted numerous meetings with area residents, home owner associations and southwest planning area businesses. However due to the large size of the southwest planning area which is comprised of 1,410 property owners within a 2.2 square mile area, and the difficulty in scheduling meetings this feasibility study is not complete. The feedback from the meetings with area residents and HOA leadership has been positive and informative about the aspects to annexing into the Town of Oro Valley. The quality of life issues that have been raised by residents are transportation related, and if the Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) plan fails to pass on the ballot, residents have inquired how the Town of Oro Valley would make necessary improvements to La Cholla Blvd and Magee Road. Additionally even though Shannon Road is not part of the RTA plan and residents feel that Town should address safety issues that currently exist as a result of increased traffic demands. Meeting with the business community have also been favorable toward annexation with a commitment from many to actively work towards the annexation being successful. It should be noted that meetings with the Foothills Mall, Omni Tucson National and developers for the N.W. corner of Magee Road / La Cholla Blvd have asked that the Town Council entertain Economic Development agreements for future development and expansion of their businesses. Staff is asking the Town Council to consider extending the feasibility study for this large southwest planning area an additional 120 days (July 1, 2006). The purpose of extending this feasibility study would be to conduct additional informational meetings with area residents and businesses to determine their community issues and interest in potential annexation into Oro Valley. Additionally a fiscal impact analysis is being developed for future Town Council review. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to extend the time to conduct a feasibility study and fiscal impact analysis of the Southwest Planning area and to report the results of the study to Council within 120 days (July 1, 2006). Scott Nelson, Special Projects Coordinator Chuck Sweet, Town Manager TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 2 "OUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: March 1, 2006 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: Pamela J. Holt, Planner SUBJECT: OV12-05-23 Bob Solfisbug, representing JBS Real Estate, requests approval of a Development Plan for a retail center known as "Big Horn Commerce" located east off Oracle Road and south of North Rams Field Pass, Parcels # 220-04-010P and 220-04-010R. BACKGROUND: Site: The 3.3 acre site is currently undeveloped develo ed land located within the Town of Oro Valley limits. The site'is p zoned C-1 CommunityCommercial. Access to this parcel is from Oracle Road and southwest of Rams Field Pass. Town Actions: • approved a General Plan Amendment for this property on June 16th, 2004. The The Town Council amendmentp ermitted a designation change from Commerce Park to Community Commercial. • The property was annexed into the Town of Oro Valley on November 17th, 2004. The translational zoning process categorized this site as Technological Park. ■ On March 2nd, 2005, Town Council conditionally approved a Rezoning from Technological Park to C-1. Rezoning conditions, as found in OV9-04-10, along with the design concept associated with the Tentative Development Plan, have been applied to this Development Plan (see the attached Tentative Development Plan associated with the Rezoning cases: OV9-04-10). SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT: Thero osal consists of a commercial complex comprised of two separate buildings, with a combined square p p footage of 28,985, with proposed uses that include a restaurant and general retail. The C-1 Community Commercial District is intended to provide for large scale office complexes and small indoor retail centers, located on a major arterial. The intent of this zoning district is to attain compatibility with adjoining residential neighborhoods, while satisfying commercial and service business needs of nearby neighborhoods. Project Elements: The following is a list of noteworthy project elements: • Building#1: 14,960 square feet; • Building#2: 14,025 square feet; • Restaurant use: 6,000 square feet in Building 1 or 2, or combination thereof; • General Retail use: 22,985 square feet; • 152 parking spaces; • Passenger drop off area and loading zones; • Pedestrian connections within the site and to the adjacent properties; and TOWN OF ORO VALLEY TAFF REPORT TO TOWN COUNCIL Page 2 ■ Mitigation elements, such as the use of walls, an overlapping tree canopy, and reduced heights of outside lighting to achieve compatibility with adjacent and future residential developments to the southeast. Surrounding Land Uses: Orientation Zoning Land Use North La Reserve Residential, Rams Canyon Phase 3, 25 PAD units Northeast La Reserve Residential, Rams Canyon, 83 units PAD Southwest Technological Shurguard Storage Park Southeast Technological Residential, Rams Pass, 86 units Park under construction (currently graded) West La Reserve Vacant, Steam Pump Village PAD DEVELOPMENT PLAN: —Compliance with Rezoning Conditions of Approval The proposed Development Plan addresses the Rezoning conditions through the use of General Notes. For example, the following are noteworthy conditions of the Rezoning approval: • "The following uses shall be prohibited by this rezoning: Kennels for Boarding, Automobile Parts Store, Grocery Store, Hardware Store, Clinic with Urgent Care Facility, Funeral Chapel, Motel or Hotel, Theater, Convenience Use—Fast Food, Car Washes, Indoor Recreation, Auto Detailing" This condition is provided as General Note #34 on the Plans. • "No light pole shall be installed along the eastern parking bay adjacent to residential uses. Ground lighting to be provided." This condition is provided as General Note #19 on the Plans. • "The developer shall pay a fair share fair a traffic signal at the intersection of Oracle Road and Rams Field Pass". This condition is provided as General Note #25 on the Plans. OVZCR Compliance I. Oracle Road Scenic Corridor Overlay District (ORSCOD) This project is not included in the area designated and adopted as ORSCOD by Town Council. II. Section 25.1 Odor Abatement M The new component of the OVZCR is Section 25.1 A 6 Odor Abatement plan. This plan is required for all restaurants and manufacturing uses at the time of Development Plan submittal. The plan is subject to Development Review Board (DRB) review and Town Council approval. The odor abatement plan must contain the following elements: TOWN OF ORO VALLEY fAFF REPORT TO TOWN COUNCIL Page 3 • An inventory of potential or identified odor emission point sources associated with the industry or land use; • A plan detailing best available control technologies and appurtenances designed to eliminate or achieve the maximum reduction of odor emission from an emission point source inclusive of, but not necessarily limited to certain processes, procedures or operating methods intended to mitigate or control odor; • A specification of the documentation that will be made available for Town review which will verify the data produced by the monitoring equipment, and which will verify that processes and procedures are conducted consistent with the specifications in the facility's odor control study and plan; • A schedule for the implementation and installation of the control technologies, appurtenances and monitoring instrumentation; and • An acknowledgment of the authority of the Town and/or County and its agents to enter into the facility and itsp roperty to investigate complaints and to verify the facility's adherence to the compliance plan. At this time, the tenant of proposed restaurant is unknown. The applicant has submitted an odor abatement plan for ageneral restaurant use (see attached Odor Abatement plan). The current odor abatement plan does not address the above listed concerns, as the proposed use is as of yet undetermined. Building permit plans will be submitted when the tenant for the restaurant space is known. At that time, a more specific odor abatement plan shall be submitted (see Condition#1. of Exhibit"A"). Lighting Concerns o While Section 27.5 addresses outdoor lighting requirements per the OVZCR, additional mitigation is needed to address neighboring residential development concerns. In order to achieve compatibility with the adjacent residential developments, no light pole shall be installed along the eastern parking bay adjacent to residential uses. Ground lighting shall be provided in this area instead of pole-mounted lights. This condition is provided as General Note#19 on the Plans. IV. Vehicular Parking The required number of parking spaces for this development is 152. The proposal meets all parking requirements. OVZCR Design Guidelines: I. Loading Zones o Addendum A 6 c: "Loading and service areas should be screened from public view. " Specifically, Addendum A 6 c ii: "Screen loading and service areas from the street and design as an integral part of the building architecture. " The applicant proposes to utilize loading zones located to the rear of the buildings. Furthermore, loading zones shall be screened by on- and off-site screen walls and dense vegetation. Delivery drop-offs are proposed to be located in the rear of the buildings as well. Pedestrian Circulation TOWN OF ORO VALLEY r ,fAFF REPORT TO TOWN COUNCIL Page 4 o Addendum A 6 f ii: "Design all parking areas to allow safe and attractive pedestrian circulation. " Ap edestrian pathway, which connects Oracle Road to the site, has been provided. Furthermore, a circular passenger drop-off zone between the buildings provides a clear pedestrian connection between the buildings. DRAINAGE The existing on-site drainage patterns (northeast to southwest)will be maintained. All onsite drainage will be conveyed by shallow PAAL sheet-flow to depressed curb openings and into detention basins along the west and -southp roperty boundaries. The detention basins are metered to reduce the post development discharge rate to pre developed rates. Off site drainage is generally from the northeast and is partly directed around the project and into existing channel running adjacent to Oracle Road. First flush treatment occurs at low flow basins using specially designed filter inserts. GRADING A Type 2 Grading Permit will be required to construct the building pad, drainage structures, utilities, parking lot, and any walls necessary for grading on the development site. TRAFFIC Access to the facility will be from two locations: west from Oracle Road, and from North Rams Field Pass. The following improvements to Rams Field Pass are required: 1. Lengthen the westbound left turn pocket on Rams Field Pass at Oracle Road/Rams Field Pass intersection to 150-ft. 2. Extend the westbound right turn pocket on Rams Field Pass at Oracle Road/Rams Field Pass intersection so that the queued left turning vehicles do not block the right turning movement. ADOT is in the process of designing improvements to Oracle Road from Calle Concordia to Tangerine Road. The expected start of construction is fall of 2007. The Town's Oracle Road Improvement District construction is scheduled to be completed by the end of November of 2006. In summary, all of these improvements will provide sufficient capacity to the area highway network for this and other projects planned for the Oracle Road corridor. GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE: Thisro osed project is held to the standards of the 1996 General Plan, as the project began prior to the p p adoption of the General Plan Update 2020. o Policy 9.1 D: "All development proposals should attempt to arrange buildings, massing of buildings, and/or arrangements of lots to preserve views from adjacent properties and streets while providing privacy for residents. " Neighborhood compatibility is a key component of this proposed development. The proposed Development Plan utilizes mitigation tactics in order to reduce potential effects of a commercial development on an adjoining residential development. • TOWN OF ORO VALLEY l AFF REPORT TO TOWN COUNCIL Page 5 These mitigation tactics include the following: • Buildingpads are arranged in such a manner as to preserve views to and from the site along Oracle Road; • Building heights hts are limited as to not block views from properties across Oracle Road; p • Proposed uses as specified in the Rezoning cases are limited in additional to the C-1 Commercial District permitted uses in order to further accommodate neighborhood needs and desires; • A continuous tree canopy, dense understory vegetation, and screen walls will further mitigate undesirable commercial development aspects; • The lighting along the eastern parking bay shall be limited to ground lighting; g g • Dumpster locations are both landscaped and screened to help with visibility and odor abatement issues; and • Views to and from the site are preserved and provide privacy for the any future neighboring residential developments. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENT: Thesurroundingproperty owners have been noticed in accordance with the Town notification requirements. To date, no comments have been received. likezonin there were numerous neighborhood meetings where the Tentative Development spart ofthe R gprocess, Plan waspresented. The primary focus of these neighborhood meetings was on the proposed land use. As a result, land use restrictions were applied to this development. Since the rezoning process,no neighborhood meetings have pp taken place. The owners recently meet with members of the La Reserve Homeowner's Association to discuss the current Development Plan and the proposed uses. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD ACTION: Ap t the special session held on December 19th, 2005 at 6:00 pm. The Development Review Board voted (6 to 0) to recommend approval of the Development Plan with the Conditions listed in Exhibit "A". The applicant has addressed all items listed in the Exhibit"A' DRB report, with the three exceptions listed in this Exhibit "A". SUMMARY OF FACTORS: 1. Thep roposed development meets all applicable zoning code requirements. 2. Staff finds that the proposed development, with the conditions listed in Exhibit "A" of the Development Plan,would have no adverse impacts to the surrounding land uses. 3. Substantive conformance with the General Plan 1996. 4. Substantive conformance with all Design Guidelines. 5. Development Review Board recommended approval. 6. Extensive mitigation has been provided to ensure neighborhood compatibility. l I TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 'AFF REPORT TO TOWN COUNCIL Page 6 SUGGESTED MOTIONS: I move to approve OV12-05-23, Development Plan for Big Horn Commerce Center, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit A. OR I move to approve OV 12-05-23, Development Plan for Big Horn Commerce Center, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit A and the following additional conditions: OR I move to deny OV 12-05-23, Development Plan for Big Horn Commerce Center, finding that: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Development Plan; 2. Exhibit"A"; and 3. Odor Abatement Plan. \,\ cLv,/ Planning and Zonint A inistrator /ALA Community Develo!ment Director 6,7,4 /I( /44-1/1 (..t7 istant Town Manager To n Manager ;arlos De Alva, Sakellar Associates, Fax: 629-9952 Robert Solfisburg, JBS Real Estate, Fax: 742-3343 F:\OV\OV 12\2005\12-05-23\Reports • Exhibit"A" OV 12-05-23 "Big Horn Commerce Center" 1. With thebuilding submittal of a permit for any restaurant use, a detail-specific odor abatement plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning and Zoning Administrator and Building Official. 2. Showpre- post-developed and concentration points on sheet DP-102 and add post developed concentration points to the proposed conditions drainage map 3. Add spot elevations to all ADA parking spaces. Ensure 2%maximum slope in any direction. 4. Provide SecurityBarriers for the detention basins per Town of Oro Valley Basin Design Requirements. 5. Clarify the wall that is shown in detail 2. Show this wall along the west parking area on the development plan . • Planning & Zoning Division 11000 N. LaCanada Drive Oro Valley, AZ 85737 'T_i? is- ; toir Phone: (520) 229-4800 Fax: (520) 742-1022 www.townoforovalley.com Application for Development Review Environmental Filtration Plan - (Nuisance Odor Plan) Date: OV Case No (office use only). Project Name: OIG tO0.14 co ER.c.e ‘..6.NTE,r4 Subdivision Lot#_ Location/Address: Zoning Parcel Number: 2-20-04'010M Lot Size t '3001 A I ftSO1 meta A. ro t' 1ob+o 220.44-010.4 Property Owner: DICv itattiJ COMM 1 a CE4-Yreste 1 L Address: 51cis 6. Cvii2A44T ', so-re (Or Phone No. 5Zo•741.71117 Fax No.:S'4x.742. 343 Contact: Bob 5oLFISSufeep Applicant:_ L '044 I TE S Applicant Representative PING sAxeLt.- Address: 00 E • '31)414 `.1-126er (Home Office) Phone No.S2.0• +,'22' 4( Fax No.47ViM52Contact No. Proposed Use Description (narrative): f&I$W JSE r:› - Type of Food Served: UNKNokbq Proposed uses and preparation of Food: WNK.NDW?I Proposed cooking equipment: ON PML Proposed Ventila 'on: it:M (44 1. Hours of operas' n .t (UM lc 00 Signature: ,.. .-.�:._.. �- _..__�... . Date: J• f 9 Printed Name: 4-N • PINO Ai-E -kez. Submittal Requirements: Request for Review of Requirements Nuisance Odor Plan Mechanical Engineer Plan Submittal Odor Consultant plan/equipment design plan submittal Recommendation of Consultant to Mechanical Engineer w/documented design suggestions for abatement Mechanical Engineer's Final suggestions along with report through specific user's representative Abatement device fully operational and acceptable mitigation measures re odor abatement are complete Review Fee Final Occupancy Permit Issued Date: N_ 3 m 7 5 in % u = O a to a in r u u A v..; gi; qa • IIP �{t 14P )41 iAgi < < �� II >' II E-, t) hf PIN Pql lK E II Urn' lig ru 'q '"1 1 gl' 1 -1g m § i i 0 g -. Aim 11 qp op ,b IA plgA Intl 4-1 0§1§wor .3 4,111! % 2 a 3! 4 r- bri # 10:(1 0 V Pi /0 $ ami A 0� 1 A• '5i gq i; ir ii 621N i V § Al ig §0 ''P r z V ��� N t -1 1 � F Y < ' A 4g TO 4N2 bT � ER S 01 'qi 1! P lip 41 ~ ° !Ai '� 4 A ��AA_ 144-Ci ,N ', 6.. N�A � p Plii N� � �b � 1 � i � � � Ai 1111 �i <8 PI �� il , . P i q �eA �'0■� t� P P ; le 4 , "�3 4 6 t O W q N>8 �§ too , ip� a � N �� Nile io �� A O SI{ � � �ii` A 'i 31 $ $ p 1i � Z�m O AMg Y ? pA � 0;JO 1 7R 0 gp,01 R r.1 „i; NW, ml b 4 IT 1 I � 0 � -11 1 r Ili : Iii Ili � '1111 i :11 i 0 a l'' A4t 64 g i A' i4A Ed 5 1; "1 Ili Ili la q 100h; '4 T i i 3 $6 M ) 9 X > d 1 A IIR iq .m.0 0 0416 ;11 gi 2 1 -4 lh pl! u gh,41 q g g 11 4 „, 4 0 gi $ 4 g j tN gtg ;Al 0 )iw ,10 1 iiiN ° ° N - a i p ' 6- i $. jw„. NWI i Ii lig i s 0 & " A 0 IAittlIPP ; Mill Hs` II Pfi oq HIp h i g 4 1 1 ci 1 i i - 1 1 N11 i i II :'it -<® N I " II 'oi: 1 1 LI r_ I 6 X t3 1 il 14 ..9'1 1 7 j - f _ , a Dr if. Ni4-i- i'le ; fir _.' ` N-,\,.; �. ; ‘ t.4 r7./iv 1 -0 - (0:.• -,. ,., NF:1-0L •-, ,, A .. ,----- / .... ..„, N ''‘'s -'' --- '---N-- 4 ) 11 r , 4 . ‘,.,,:,..:::- --. - --\ -,-;,: -,,,L..\ ..-_.._ - ,..,- , .,. ...„....,,,...„7, 21/ > 'C'-'-•---x ' / V 0 /... __1‘. 4':‘,:,,,_ \k '•-'I -' . ,.s, N � ce .; '� .i' s tr., ,i,�.' - ",.,,,. - ;:. . /..-- (b s\t„-- ./T4,,;'••••,, '•:H. : / ,_:/„.:,_4 6, -•.,,, --"Nyt /4 ,, •\ • ,,,' _.:._ -__. .\\ 1 ,4# ,44,„,,, ,,, :•• • i + , , \ 4 // ... :.:,,I, / Z4, ././.. i .,..,, ii ... • • — ,_,.f ,-,,,., 4. .,..• - • —:, ,,,,;> ,.,,.. .,.. ) 4f, 4,; t' .i'''.;#2, l%<'-'-'7 E .,,, 41,4 /-../-4.:/:_zo/ ./...".i ,. A ./„.„ ,./ ilii - , - ./- , 4 is ',:t4/.• ,› 0- ,.,,i; -- ., . . i , ,. /-,..T.,.,,, 5 4e\ i 4a T- A h § 4. niq _ s XN-1 hi hi Z z `D g � a N xr> z � �! �,a �� ti °c4 ig, § I\ 1-1“5',0438 i,• x 670 -0 �70 rtt OY rn g%,3%),_ 7o N%� IT, 11!liTiS s s bid g. 1 � < 110° 1'- - -1 el YIlh Vi 5E i i214'6' <V z _,1,4 › sp'-d71 - klii,rglka! i4Polp2 ri. - NI , 1,1 -4'44 '8 1 -- °. 2 - 1 T ! i i i \ \ ri N .3i�li d., -( n — N 5 godgp l o >401-1.6; 7a �--- d �D .. rn g l'' t tth E legr > a 1b Q in 4 61 2 R --- pi -I ' (•-, 1 ,i ',I §/ inilgg' q 8IiiSt ) CI 7' , L'$ 0 - 6 6 ' - ' 1, >0 pi p AqAh fQ 1 1 1 4 d 0-d'„ > z4 WI a .(-.1% rn -; 8 61 ' 6114 i'; 10 4 10' 0- ? A ; ; ;g J Is ,- r 1 N c. 1� Nli" lig 0 1./) ' -. " = 5 t A liF A -I“ — CR -,. z g z z_ au 0 A Po, T,.. ;1 'f irk, 1 --,.., 4 1 I, A t, -I aj z Z I u N Ti al-. ti ,-.A 0 1 N e gig L'..-----/ (-?,0, (I' 'i t ."- rn I 0, ....•`: O'dip i Z Z \' O b '► `'. ....P O . ,i 4 k }3jUR�wi 4 :e, ,-.-.4 * f6I§1:N 44$': i /`%/\1 rn1 11 0 01 ti 0]I 4 ■ V ��\ -Zo w+�' O g N4 it//�•i5 W 14 5t-\/`\/% P \ 'J \ N N N:,‘,7,''14, `\ \ r , ,40' / \ '',, ,2 N O i , ✓/t.(II . :,,,, , ‘,.. :„,, , _4— .. •.,47341;7?-.., 47.,41%-''` -e\ xel\ \ �I�I'�� � � ©/ 'f,A.. `.lit f ,_,..., \-r • • ..,� !•_ul �, \ >,N r- ; -,111111 ,10,,,,,, ' .4-':•:* .' •-•.' laib.: -. • ''''N.,>, ,, X t.,,,,_,.Nt'k' ni 1> 140411 4,44',„•-die,".4t)' 44,..,1.- -, .: "5-t---,,, . tpl 0 SII .S '.;� 'o I '�L ''y�/ �1 b \` ., ., .. ., .i .r.„„:„..;;;,,,,,,p,- tre,, ..; s.,1114 4 . .\••• 1.,,'''.>\\,, I __ti�It / • / //l, :,f� \� 3 X76 l:t _ \ / ii'SE 1,7 / �i� / 4111111‘ vimY VA. 'OF,' .../..4'.- ) r'q ,1 z !9.e.,; .\ ..\ <.',.3 . ,\_s i •', , 141 I'. Mr4.-10 40. . ' /NIT' :••V VI ' '1'.:' .....;',.. ',. \ , „ -,.74.,;),,,, //,.. _ ..,,, , g / -,,- ,N,:,,,Leb ,,,,, ' ...,',.•10,"/ 4,4., 50.94 'i ::: 411.7t.' ...'...441:::41 : , :‘,,,, •� d \� Sr. w ..„....-do_ .- f i 1 .'" )7.-'' IP ,' --7-4..‘ •'• Ne "per `�. �� /4•A S� d,. ..t. 4 460 A'!Ok. ,,,,,t1'16 /*41-,,r .,40P'.4'41v ',,''''. '1, Si:, -*-1 ‘.i."S,,./ ' .-''' � , . ---.1- �er,*��U 14, ,• ,, x �0 '•�_I'II�ill, (NDN V, ,,:.4, 4 . _'� 1,:,';.`1, '� .• , , 4„*. o •,''4% ‘\;sr., 1'e ./.'‘',,,,-,Y,' ,., Ai'lvir-- /4' it,- / . T ,St ‘. •,4 i .. ,...—:4- ., - "*.,,,,,-$-, ,, /*1 -), , -41? .0, \ sa,A, 41 '‘.7 lt•'.-4 \'S, A /111V-•''', ' /. ,.,$.'\T. ' * 4.1 # 4,„0. , - :-...:., • y_ ,,,,,, , ..„,..;..- , 0%. 0 , ,,,,,:i. .,..,, \ ,,,s4 0,„. A.,.,.j.# _ *.to*,/;...? .,, ,,,,.., - 1:-. ',./. 5c., Nv--44,45.‘,ii....'‘4 s , . .1rwit/* .-, . .. ,. - ,.,4 ./. Aii . ... -] 4 ' ,f..$\\ )74+ ..41,V4-1„,Lii5',4 Id \ abs /" ''. + •R .,_,•-•e,fr :' / gi air' u �`W� a _ �.� 10 1 ,, •4' \\ ,•i* 't, -1 i lg, '4' •,c,4iP *1kt, \ ..,..., ,/,; , , / . - gg ' 4 \\\\:101 ii% .... iv' /1 ,./, ,/ 4' \ \'444ipi,, /449i ' // . ‘'' ' . ''''..t.-N;,r4'. ,P ./ ,/,_1! , ..\ \, ti‘,/,-:•,'..4-i;i / T! T r p u -LT" ,i .: u O�" -141 / Z 1111 b ii j, // 4, ,P/• j , 5iA -1 4; .— ; v, (-- i. / -A f N a I qg��J �2N� (i� �gaD � �o}��°i R g 9� 1 rn 11�� �i��1 '��il�Y14 f�PIii�p, rn l_g ��`°1_�a °�1� rn O A_ ��•a.,AO = ?Tk D r ® w�- , ( O m i a I' rn qz to a 1, z , u a> ,rc In 0° 6 r c�.n 8' S� T -5 1 1 ,1 p u___ z z O 70 , N -� 1 T Z `� /'N'lig lR g T ll- Ii> 4 N N ,R ll.--, 1! l 11 a U 0 i 42'-' Pg ki D 1r � F -@ 1 - i � � � � it I>t �� Z i> igl! ;!!iiiii-A!1; ((k.' • t i N �t 11 - ■ �0 1 111 D a rn D s, > 4 1 1 i.l!e118 �gc — -_- _F.g � n (` g u $ 11 b� ° �� �� - is --1r 0 q q i!lifi& 1.1 gq.pqqi fj O - x 8 8 8 8 i,,! i.; ..r,' g qaN o " 1 li" Wi8 I ‘p �� ' —Q ' N —O g g, g ci, :* > !:...T. U1 Z 1 a az _ TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: March 1, 2006 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Philip C. Saletta, P.E., Water Utility Director SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION AND/OR POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING DIRECTION FROM TOWN COUNCIL TO WATER UTILITY STAFF TO PARTICIPATE IN DEVELOPING A COOPERATIVE REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY ORGANIZATION AS PROPOSED BY THE SOUTHERN ARIZONA WATER USERS ASSOCIATION. SUMMARY: The Southern Arizona Water Users Association (SAWUA) is a group of municipal and agricultural water providers that meet regularly and discuss various local, state and federal water matters. The group consists of the following members: Avra Water Co-op, BKW Farms, Community Water Company of Green Valley, Farmers Investment Company, Flowing Wells Irrigation District, Kai Farms, Marana Municipal Water System, Metro Water District, Oro Valley Water Utility, Pima County Wastewater, Ranch Sahuarita Water Co., and Tucson Water Department. SAWUA has recently prepared the attached proposal that describes a plan for developing a Cooperative Regional Water Supply Organization. This organization would include participation from municipal providers that currently have Central Arizona Project (CAP) Water or are interested in acquiring additional CAP Water or ,ther available supplies, such as effluent or reclaimed water. In addition, the organization can provide a regional voice for its participants regarding Colorado River issues and Central Arizona Project Water as well as other state water issues. The attached SAWUA Proposal describes the proposed organization in terms of need, purpose, governance and next steps. Regarding governance, it is important to note that members of the Board of Directors would be appointed by each of the participant's governing body. The Town Council would select and appoint an Oro Valley representative to serve on the Board for this proposed organization. In addition, each participant would have one member on the Board and each member would have one vote. There is no weighted voting or control by any one participant. This proposal is the first step to determine if the potential member participants are interested in pursuing such an organization. One of the next steps is to further study the issues and prepare a report. At some point a formal agreement would be needed to establish the organization. Any future reports or agreements would be reviewed by the Water Utility Commission and then brought back to Town Council for consideration. The SAWUA Proposal was presented to the Water Utility Commission on Monday, February 13, 2006 and their recommendation to Town Council was to support the SAWUA proposal and move forward with the process to study this further.. Water Utility Staff is currently seeking direction from Town Council regarding participating in these studies and process to develop and form this Cooperative Regional Water Supply Organization. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY _OUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 2 The benefits of this proposed organization to Oro Valley include the following: • Regional voice regarding water issues, policy and legislation, specifically with respect to CAP Water g • Provides a future opportunity to acquire additional CAP or other available water supplies • Provides for a regional approach to water acquisition and development • Provides for potential cost savings of source of water supply by acquiring supplies on a wholesale basis • Provides a potential framework for developing water supplies on a regional basis • Oro Valley Water Utility and the other water member providers would still operate their independent water systems in their service area and control their independent water supplies and delivery systems for their respective customers. • Provides for further opportunities to cooperate with other participating members in water acquisition and delivery in a structured organization that benefits the individual members and Southern Arizona on a regional basis. • Participants would not try to acquire additional water supply outside of the organization. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost for developing such an organization is estimated to be $15,000 to $20,000 of staff time and legal app ort to develop studies or agreements to form such an organization. This is expected to occur over a twelve to eighteen month period. RECOMMENDATION: At the Water Utility Commission meeting on February 13, 2006 the Commission unanimously passed a motion to recommend that Town Council direct staff to participate in studies, and in developing an agreement for a ve Coo eratiRegional Water Supply Organization as proposed by the Southern Arizona Water Users Cooperative g Association. Water Utility Staff also makes this recommendation. ATTACHMENTS: SAWUA Proposal—August 16, 2005 SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to direct staff to move forward with this process to develop a Cooperative Regional Water Supply Organization and to participate in developing a report with recommendations on how to proceed with creating this regional organization as proposed by the Southern Arizona Water Users Association. OR I move to ,---. r'� / l � 1 Water Utility D' -ctor ,/ Town Manager r August 16,2005 PROPOSAL: ESTABLISH A COOPERATIVE REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY ORGANIZATION TO OPTIMIZE EXISTING AND SECURE NEW WATER SUPPLIES The Southern Arizona Water Users Association (SAWUA) supports the creation of a voluntary non-profit organization to manage, obtain and use renewable water supplies. Members and their p g customers will benefit from the organization's ability to use economies of scale, represent the region as a whole on relevant water issues, and optimize renewable water supplies. Members would retain their individual stewardship for their respective service areas and customers. SAWUA recognizes that the governance and structure of the organization is critical to its success,as is the basic concept of regional cooperation. Each Member's consensus would be necessary for major Board decisions. The organization would have the sole right to negotiate acquisition of new water supplies after formal formation on behalf of members in order to avoid competition among members. Purpose & Goal SAWUA believes a regional water supply organization would strengthen Southern Arizona's water resources. The proposed organization would act as a wholesale water provider for its Members. As noted above, each Member would have full representation in all major decisions, which will ensure regional cooperation and protect the interests of individual Members. The objectives for the organization are summarized as follows: • Obtain additional supplies of water for Southern Arizona from sources such as Colorado River, effluent, and underground basins. • Facilitate the optimal use of existing renewable water supplies. • Formulate and present positions to relevant agencies of the United States, the State of Arizona, and other government agencies on issues pertaining to renewable water resources. • Proactively address Colorado River and Central Arizona Project water issues such as allocation of supply, reliability, water quality, and drought and shortage responses. • Develop projects to deliver wholesale water and to acquire, develop, store,treat, conserve, and transport water supplies. Membership & Governance Members would be water and wastewater providers. Members would benefit from the organization serving as a wholesale water provider, manager of resources, and a united voice for its members, while preserving their individual responsibility for their customers. The Board of Directors would be comprised of directors who are appointed by and a member of the governing body of each Member. Each director would have one vote. A unanimous agreement would be needed on major decisions. A Managers Committee comprised of the water utility director or general managers of the Members would advise the Board. The Managers Committee would also include managers of Regional Water Supply Organization August 16,2005 Page 2 water companies who have a contractual agreement with the organization for specific services. The Managers Committee would work closely with the Executive Director, who would be appointed by the Board. The Need SAWUA has long been a proponent of cooperative efforts to preserve and enhance the quality and quantity of Southern Arizona's water resources. The Arizona Department of Water Resources projects municipal water demand in the region will increase by 40-55%by the year 2025. (Third Management Plan, Table 11-2) Regional cooperation is essential in order for water providers to meet this projected demand effectively and efficiently. The current drought has impacted Arizona in various ways including the noticeably faster than anticipated decline of local groundwater tables. The drought has further highlighted Southern Arizona's need to work together to pursue new water supplies to meet the region's growing water demand. Additionally, the"Law of the River" states that the Central Arizona Project (CAP) will be curtailed before any other water rights in the Lower Basin. Due in part to our geographic location at the end of the CAP canal, Southern Arizona needs to ensure that it has an equal and active profile in state water discussions when water policies and regulations are being made. A cooperative and coordinated effort rather than individual pursuits will better serve the collective interests of the region. The proposed organization would work with various entities to obtain new water supplies to ry meet projected demand including Indian Nations and agricultural water providers. The organization would not replace SAWUA but would augment its efforts to have a stronger, more united Southern Arizona securing its water future. Next Steps • Present this proposal to the governing boards of prospective members and solicit their support and direction in further development of the organization. • Present proposed organization to community interest groups and solicit support on the importance of an organization to secure new water supplies for the region. • Launch a study of financial and legal considerations related to the development of the proposed organization, including how private water companies would interact with public water companies within the proposed governance structure. The intent is not to exclude private water companies, which would have the option to enter contractual agreements with the organization, but to maintain compatibility with the Arizona Corporation Commission's requirements regulating private water companies. • Prepare agreements and related documents to formalize the establishment of the proposed regional water supply organization for approval by the governing body of each participant. These agreements and documents would address the business, financial, technical, operational, legal, administrative, and water allocation aspects of this proposed organization. s TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 4 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: March 1, 2006 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Philip C. Saletta, P.E., Water Utility Director Kevin McCaleb, Water Conservation Specialist SUBJECT: Hot Water Recirculation Systems: Continual Operation Systems vs. Point of Service Systems SUMMARY: At the request of Council, the Water Utility Director and the Water Conservation Specialist have researched the issue of Hot Water Recirculation Systems (Point of Service) as a viable water conservation tool for use by customers of Oro Valley Water and whether or not to recommend ordinance adjustments to facilitate installations. Attached is a report to the Water Utility Commission outlining research performed by the Conservation Specialist in 2003 and existing ordinances in Sierra Vista, Marana and Goodyear. Marana and Goodyear have chosen not to implement these systems into their ordinances. Sierra Vista reported difficulties in getting contractors to comply with the ordinance and that the ordinance itself was rewritten on multiple occasions to limit contractor interpretation. Ultimately, additional resources were invested to engineer a detailed installation drawing to limit inadequate and faulty installations. Also included is a letter from Linda Douglas of Tucson Electric Power outlining their concerns with the continual operation system. Definitions: oint of Service System: The pump attaches to the existing plumbing beneath either the fixture most frequently used or the fixture that is furthest from the hot water heater. Point of service systems are "on demand" requiring only a switchable outlet be installed to its location. Timers, programmable and remote controlled switches may be installed for added convenience. Point of service systems require no additional plumbing. Continual Operation System: This is a type of hot water recirculation system that is continually moving water through a return pipe to allow the temperature at the taps to remain constant, regardless of time of day. These systems may utilize thermostats to regulate temperatures in the lines and/or timers can be installed to operate the pumps only during required times of the day. Continual operation systems must have a dedicated return line to operate properly. Installation of both types of systems are currently an option for homeowners and contractors. No code exists in Oro Valley that would restrict them from being installed. However, there is a potential for increased power consumption by the continuous operating system, as well as the cost associated with the additional plumbing required. As such, we would recommend Building Code changes that would encourage the use of the less power consumptive point of service system. The Code could be changed to require the installation of a switchable outlet at the fixture furthest away from the hot water heater or at the fixture most frequently used, such as the master bathroom, to allow for easier and less costly installations by homeowners. This would be very similar to the electrical wiring for a garbage disposal but it would be located at the master bathroom sink or other further fixture. The concept is that the electrical wiring could be installed while the house is under construction providing the lomeowner the option to install a hot water recirculation system. Although there is a component of water conservation associated with these devices, it is site specific as to the amount of water saved. Generally, in most homes, it is approximately 3 to 7 gallons per day or 100 to 200 gallons per month. These devices are primarily for convenience and comfort. FISCAL IMPACTS: taff time with some minimal expenses. RECOMMENDATION: Staff proposes to develop possible building code changes for electrical wiring to allow for the optional installation of point of service hot water recirculation systems. Staff will perform this work on a parallel track with the graywater and rain water harvesting building code changes. It is anticipated that the final recommendation will be presented to Council in October, 2006. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to direct staff to develop proposed building code changes for electrical wiring that facilitates and allows for the optional installation of point of service hot water recirculation systems. Or I move to..... ATTACHMENTS: 1) TEP Letter 2) 2003 Report , ,4 '7Z A02. - AD t A r .0 / Water Conservation Specialist h / 6/ g -C(--,--' ( `- '/: - ,/.) ei—/( W er ti ty 'rector f.t.ei,44 - Town Manager ATTACHMENT #1 •11\\-U EY'gR/ O �O Off- 'L t (10Pe Dov 1g1 LADED TEP Letter Contin uous Hot Water Circulation Page 1 of 2 From: Douglas, Linda [LDouglasTucsOflElectflc.Com] Sent: Thursday,March 27, 2003 2:34 PM To: 'kmccaleb@orovalley.net' Cc: Rickards, Wally Subject: Continuous Hot Water Circulation Kevin: I can't tell you how appreciative I am that you called me regarding the desires of Oro Valley Town Council, to develop an ordinance requiring installation of hot water circulating pumps. Since you have already calculated the potential water savings I will not even address this part of the calculation. However for 29 years I have been handling electric and/or gas customer high-bill complaints related to the installation of these units. The energy penalty for operating the actual pump itself is minimal - about$2.00 - $3.00 a month. The huge energy penalty is created because of the heat loss from the water to the ground or slab. Just think of this - if the slab temperature is around 75 degrees and the water temperature is 130 degrees, you have a 55 degree differential in temperature. As hot water flows through the lines it gives up heat to the slab and cools off. By the time the water is returned to the water heater, the water is colder than the desired storage temperature of the tank and the heat source (either gas or electric)comes on to re-heat the same water to the storage temperature. Then this cycle begins all over again as hot water continues to circulate through the line and your water heater continues to heat the same water over and over again - even if you do not use one gallon of water. A number of years ago we installed hundreds of actual test meters to help customers understand normal causes for high-bill complaints. I was a lead investigator on literally thousands of these calls. Although results vary because of the size of the house, the length of the water line in the slab and the storage temperature at the water heater, it would not be unusual to quadruple the energy cost to heat water with continuous circulation. For instance I recall a couple of the actual tests very well. One of them was a 2500 sq. ft. town home with four elderly ladies living in the home. We convinced them to allow us to turn the circulating pump off for a week and meter actual energy use and then turn it on the next week to repeat the test. The cost for these ladies to heat water without the circulating pump was $38.00 a month and the cost to heat water with the pump in operation was $180.00. Another test was in a smaller home of about 1300 sq. ft. with a family of 5. The cost to heat water without the pump was about $42.00 and with the pump in operation the cost jumped to $122.00. Over the years both as TGE (both gas and electric service)and TEP (electric service only)we have delt with customer high-bill complaints directly related to the use of this 'convenience' item. If the Town Council pursues this ordinance it is imperative that the ordinance include a fail-save method to limit operation of the pump. Timers can be used to limit operation to one or two hours during the morning and late afternoon, however the trippers commonly fall off the timer face and the customer is unaware of it until they receive either their gas or electric bill. Another way to limit operation is to install an aqua-stat with a count-down timer. This is a thermometer in the return water line to the tank itself and a timer to limit the time the pump is on. If the water in the return line cools to a pre-set temperature, the pump automatically comes on for 10 minutes or so,just long enough to replace cooled water in the line with heated water from the tank. It is also very important that both TEP and SWG be notified when this ordinance will be in effect as it will impact the size of customers energy bills and increase the potential for calls to our customer service areas. If possible we should try and note the presence of a hot water circulating pump on each address so we can adivse customers in the future of the reason for higher than expected energy usage. Please don't hesitate to call if I can be of further assistance. Sincerely, Linda S. Douglas ,, Guarantee Home Program Manager ow f le /I \Documents%20and%20Settings\ichaparro\Local%20Settings\Temporary%201nter... 2/15/2006 ATTACHMENT #2 �PLLEY qR/ O OQ- 'L 1 it 4 O g1N UNDED 2003 Report TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COMMISSION COMMUNICATION APRIL 14, 2003 TO: WATER UTILITY COMMISSION MEMBERS FROM: Kevin McCaleb, Water Conservation Specialist SUBJECT: Report on Hot Water Recirculation Pumps and Systems Overview: The following is a report outlining findings on the feasibility of writing an ordinance mandating the installation of a hot water recirculation system; or point of service systems. During the-process of generating this report, existing ordinances in Sierra Vista, Marana, and Goodyear dealing with this type of installation were researched. Tucson Electric was also consulted concerning usage rates. Summary of Data: All of the municipalities contacted reported the same difficulty in enacting an ordinance of this type. How can the costs of operation be justified by the amount of water conserved? Sierra Vista, the only one of the three municipalities that has this type of ordinance in place, reported difficulties in getting builders to comply. The ordinance was rewritten several times to limit "contractor interpretation" and finally a detailed installation drawing was generated to limit inadequate and faulty installations. Marana could find little if any significant capture of water waste to support installation mandates and there by chose to offer installation as part of an overall conservation incentive option package. The incentive package entails a group of conservation options (hot water recirculation pumps and/or systems are only one option) and offers a deduction of certain permit fees if implemented. Goodyear was also unable to produce data to warrant installation mandates and instead chose to treat it as a convenience. In their ordinance, they mandate installation of power fixtures in appropriate locations instead. This provides the owner the option at any given time to install a point of service unit if desired with out the expense of running new wire. Tucson electric provided the most significant data. They have performed multiple controlled tests and surveys specifically on power consumption of these systems. Their findings showed that power consumption for hot water increased substantially, as much as four times normal usage,when recirculation systems were installed. The use of thermostats and timers reduce that amount if monitored and used properly; however, the rise in power consumption was still significant. Research: Pipe size is the biggest indicator of how much water must be passed through the system prior to achieving hot water. Basically the cooler water in the line must be replaced by hot water. Using 1/2" type "K" copper pipe for calculation, it was found that in a 100 foot run of copper, only a little better than 1 gallon would be lost (1.14) during replacement. Once the cooler water was replaced, until such time as static cooling occurred, the water would continue to be warm at the fixture. So typically, while the morning rush to work • and school was on, the water would remain warm in the lines. • TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COMMISSION COMMUNICATION PAGE 2 OF 2 When examining how a recirculation system works, it becomes apparent that the sub-slab (location of water lines) temperature in the home is significantly cooler than the water in the lines. This causes the water in the lines to cool dramatically. The difference between the temperature in the sub-slab and the water can be as much 50 degrees. In true recirculation systems, the static water in the lines is cooled rapidly and must be cycled into the water heater to be brought up to the required temperature. This causes an increase in the duration and frequency in which the heating unit must fire to re-heat the water being held. Even with thermostats and timers, ambient heat in the lines will be tough to maintain. Point of service systems operate on the same principle, except that they use existing plumbing to accomplish the return. Their system operates only upon demand. The system has to be manually operated to avoid the same cooling as the recirculation system creates. If there is a demand for hot water, a switch must be operated to require the pump to move the hot water from the tank to replace the cooler water in the'lines. These systems operate on the premise of being able to move the water quickly through the system and minimize cooling as the water travels through the pipes. Audit Data: One audit was performed on a two-story house in the Monterrey-subdivision in Oro Valley. The farthest fixture from the hot water heater was tested. It took 1.20 minutes for hot water to'arrive at the tap. Total loss of water... less than 1/2 gallon. Summary: The concept sounds like a good idea, in fact, in theory it would be. However, with current construction practices it could conceivably cost a homeowner much more in power consumption than could be justified by water savings. More significant results could be made by eliminating the long pipe runs in the design of a home; requiring hot water heaters to be centrally located; and that piping was substantially insulated pp regardless of a lication. If an ordinance is still desired, staff would recommend adopting an ordinance g similar to the City of Goodyear. // ter) onservation pecialist 1 1ty Admini s ator 4/ Water Utility Director 4-14-03 MINUTES, ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY COMMISSION (ember,LaQuita Stec suggested checking the League of Cities and Towns website. Arizona Hydrological Society Abstract: Oro Valley Water will be presenting an abstract at the annual AHS conference. The article is entitled Introduction of The Town of Oro Valley's Reclaimed Water Program. Mr. Ruiz is making all the necessary changes.The conference will take place September 17. CAP System Reliability: Mr. Ruiz indicated that on May 12th Mr. Eric Holler would be giving a 20 minute CAP System Reliability presentation. Conservation Subcommittee: Member,LaQuita Stec reported the following: • Meeting: Conservation subcommittee met April 14, 2003. In attendance was Gregg Forszt, Kevin McCaleb, and Carolyn Schneider. • Landscape Contractors: Kevin proposed that landscaping companies have certified irrigation technicians on board. Reasons: Better management of resources, TOV will be able to have a qualified contractor's list. This list would recommend qualified contractor's when residents have problems or need help. • Graywater Piping: Kevin proposed making the installation of graywater piping mandatory during the construction of new homes. Mr. McCaleb would be getting more information regarding costs and fees. He will be meeting with SAHBA on Thursday,April 17. • Municipal Washing Station for Town Vehicles and Equipment: Kevin proposed having a municipal washing station, because it would save time, money and water. This type of facility would include water recycling equipment to minimize potable water usage. The subcommittee decided to review this item further, and to include it in the subcommittee's `Long term goal list'. Town vehicles car wash estimate = $10,680 per year. • Conservation Subcommittee "Citizen at Large" Member: The subcommittee recommended having a "Citizen at Large"member. Member, Gordon Byrnes also volunteered to join the subcommittee. Soy • Conservation meetings: Future meetings will be held during the day at the Oro Valley Water Utility Conference Room. • Conservation Subcommittee Chair—Member,LaQuita Stec volunteered to be Chair for this Subcommittee. The Commission agreed that it would be a good idea having a "Citizen at Large" member. Staff will forward copies of previous Water Utility Commission applicants to the subcommittee. A short blurb will be added in the WaterWays newsletter advertising this position. STAFF REPORTS: Mr.McCaleb reported the following on Hot Water Recirculating Pumps and Systems: • Ordinances: Mr. McCaleb researched other communities with existing ordinances. • Recirculation Pump Problems: Amount of energy being used to run pumps, difficulties getting contractors to install pumps. Sierra Vista was the only municipality that had an ordinance mandating a recirculation system in new homes. The ordinance was written several times to limit "contractor's interpretation" because systems were not being installed properly. Mr. McCaleb gave a brief explanation on the recirculating system,installation and pipes. Mr. McCaleb suggested that if an ordinance was still required, staff would recommend adopting an ordinance similar to the City of Goodyear. Goodyear was unable to produce data to warrant installation mandates and instead chose to treat the recirculating systems as a convenience. By using the City of Goodyear ordinance as a guideline, the homeowner would have the option to install the pump if they desire. By using this option, the town would not have to set up a mandated ordinance. 'Ir.IVIcCaleb ended his report. Now The Commission agreed with staff that the recirculating pumps should only be used for convenience and that the ordinance would not be necessary at this time. 5 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: March 1, 2006 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & TOWN COUNCIL FROM: Bob Kovitz, Governmental and Community Relations Administrator SUBJ: Proposed 2006 Holiday Parade On January 18, 2006, the Town Council received a report regarding the 2005 Holiday Parade. After discussion, the Council directed the Holiday Parade Committee to examine the proposed 2006 date of December 9 to determine if there were any conflicts with other events that would create staffing issues (particularly for the Police Department). The Council also requested that the Committee consider other organizations that could assist in the parade effort rather than having the parade be the sole responsibility of the Town. With that direction, the Holiday Parade Committee met on January 25, 2006, to consider those two issues. Parade Date: The principal difficulty with the December 9, 2006, date was the fact that the Tucson 1111110, Marathon is scheduled to be run on Sunday, December 10, 2006. This will create staffing challenges es for the Police Department. However, those staffing issues are less severe if the Tucson Marathon is able to use either the Foothills Business Park or Honeywell as its end point. Therefore, the Police Department will be in touch with the operator of the Tucson Marathon to ensure that the race's finish line will be at one of these locations. If the Tucson Marathon cannot secure one of those locations and wishes to move the finish line to the Hilton El Conquistador (where it has been occasionally in the past), then the Marathon operator will be advised to change the date of the race from December 10 or to look for other locations for 2006. The reason that the Hilton El Conquistador finish line is an issue is because of the number of police officers that will be needed if the Marathon crosses the 1st Avenue and Oracle intersection. Therefore, the Committee recommends that the date of Saturday, December 9, be designated for the 2006 Holiday Parade. Organizational Responsibility for the Parade: The Holiday Parade Committee discussed the possibility of turning the organizational responsibility for the parade over to an outside group. The discussion included such issues as use of town property and personnel (e.g., roads, traffic control), the ability to enter into contracts for ancillary needs (e.g., busses, portable toilets), and the need for up-front funding to support pre-parade necessities (e.g., printing brochures). The discussion also focused on financial transparency for sponsorship donations and the need to have an organization which is insured and which can accept tax-deductible donations. The Committee determined that an arrangement similar to the one that the Town has with the Maya Tea Company for operation of the Farmer's Market combined with the arrangement that the Town has with GOVAC for the 4th of July event could serve as templates for operational responsibility for the parade. Under this scenario, an independent citizen's volunteer committee would handle many of the tasks that were previously handled by town staff. But, the Town would still maintain overall financial and operational control of the parade so that issues such as those listed above can be addressed. The Committee also felt that the parade has demonstrated that it can be self-supporting financially. A combination of increased sponsorship fees combined with an increase in business participation will mean that the 2006 Holiday Parade event will not require any funding from the Town. Instead, the Town's contribution will be through in-kind staff time and coordination similar to the Farmer's Market and the 4th of July concert. Since Hiremath Family Dentistry has already stepped forward to offer a $2000 donation to the parade effort, the committee (through the Town) will have sufficient seed funds throughout 2006. These funds will allow the Committee to begin its business support outreach efforts earlier in the year. In addition, some of the up-front costs from the first year were one-time and will not have to be incurred again. Recommendation: The Council may wish to consider the following recommended motion: I move to designate December 9, 2006, as the date for the Town's Holiday Parade and I further direct that the parade planning and staging be turned over to a citizens' volunteer committee that will be assisted by Town staff as needed, and that the Town will maintain operational and financial management for the parade. OR I move ..0411/ Bob ovitz, Governmental . d Community Relations Administrator Chuck Sweet, own Manager