HomeMy WebLinkAboutPackets - Council Packets (1023)7435 N. Oracle Rd., Suite 107
GREATER
OROVALLEY Y
Oro Valley, AZ 85704
P: 520.297.2191
Chimlmr if Commerce F: 520.742.7960
orovalleychamber.com
................................................................................................................................................
Chairman
Greg Durnan March 6, 2019
Acacia IT
Vice chair Mayor Joe Winfield, members of the Oro Valley Town Council, town staff
Nancy Boyle
Splendido at Rancho
Vistoso Ladies and gentlemen,
Past chair The Greater Oro Valley Chamber of Commerce stands in support of
Toni Dorsey Ordinance (0)19-04, an amendment to the Oro Valley Town Centre
AAA Arizona planned area development, Item 1 on Wednesday's a enda.
p pg
Directors We believe the increase in lots from 65 to 82 is a reasonable,
Alan Dankwerth moderate increase, particularly with the developers' offer to make all
Market Considerations these homes 1 -story. That key concession, combined with shifting of
Veronica Apodaca lots away from more visible land, wider buffer yards, the expansive use
Northwest Healthcare /
Oro Valley Hospital of native vegetation, and the creation of a lone access point at the
Jeff Artzi existing Pusch View Lane bridge, will benefit everyone concerned
Vistoso Automotive about views, to include neighbors, motorists and the residents
Mark Mitchell themselves.
Mark Mitchell CPA Reduced lot sizes are fair response to the housing market.
Kay Williams Practically, people are not going to build large homes on 15,000 -
Southern Arizona square -foot lots on this piece of ground. Still, these smaller lot sizes are
Veterans and First
Responders Living in line with adjacent residential properties.
Memorial It's critical to note that the original PAD' s preservation of open space
Cindy Webb Hanson and protection of hillsides on this lovely piece of property is
OneAZ Credit Union
essentially intact, with up to 70 percent open space, protected
Eric Renaud forever from development. That's huge. We live here too and we want
Pima Federal Credit Union p g �
Jack Talmage to see our community develop wisely, with careful balancing of
Oro Valley Country Club private property interests and environmental protection.
Jeremy Thompson The Oro Valley way is for developers and neighbors to engage, to
Cox listen, and to approach acceptable compromise. That has occurred on
Bruce Baca this parcel, through 2 neighborhood meetings and extensive follow-up
Coldwell Banker conversations. In Oro Valley, nobody gets everything they want, but
Residential Brokerage
everyone gets something, and the community prospers as a result.
Michelle Armstrong Oro Valley's deliberative process is once again yielding a good result.Tohono Chul Park
Peter Minot We appreciate the willingness of all parties, and respectfully request
Southwest Solutions that this amendment be recommended for approval. Thank you for
Mike Platt your time and your service.
El Conquistador Tucson, A Respectfully submitted,
Hilton Resort
Dave Perry
President / CEO
On behalf of the Greater Oro Valley Chamber of Commerce board of directors
Stine, Michelle
From: Standish, Michael
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2019 8:12 AM
To: Stine, Michelle
Subject: FW: Comments on the PADs Proposed at Oracle Road and Pusch View Lane
Attachments: COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSAL OF TWO PLANNED AREAS OF DEVELOPMENT NEAR
LA RESERVE AT ORACLE ROAD AND PUSCH VIEW LANE.docx; ATT00001.htm
From: Standish, Michael
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2019 8:12 AM
To: Town Council <council@orovalleyaz.gov>
Cc: Jacobs, Mary <mjacobs@orovalleyaz.gov>; Cornelison, Chris <ccornelison@orovalleyaz.gov>; Vella, Bayer
<bvella @orova I leyaz.gov>
Subject: FW: Comments on the PADs Proposed at Oracle Road and Pusch View Lane
Good Morning,
Please see the comments below and attached regarding Regular Agenda item #1.
Thank you.
Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: Gary Enters - _
To: mjacobs <mjacobs@orovalleyaz.gov>
Sent: Fri, Oct 12, 2018 12:25 pm
Subject: Comments on the PADs Proposed at Oracle, Road and Pusch View Lane
Hello Mary Jacobs,
As a home owner in La Reserve, I would like to have my attached comments provided to the Oro
Valley Planning and Zoning Commission and the Town Council for the upcoming scheduled meeting
on the proposal concerning development of two PADs near La Reserve at Oracle Road and Pusch
View Lane. Unfortunately, I will be out of town at that time, but would greatly appreciate your help in
distributing my comments.
My wife and I love the La Reserve environment, and are concerned that this area, with its beautiful
natural environment and wildlife, will be adversely affected by this proposal. We do not think that it is,
in the long run, in the best interests of Oro Valley.
Thank you for your help and consideration.
6ory Enters
Oro Valley, Arizona 857.37
COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSAL OF TWO PLANNED AREAS OF DEVELOPMENT
NEAR LA RESERVE AT ORACLE ROAD AND PUSCH VIEW LANE
F" 0 '
As a home owner in Deer Run in La Reserve for nearly a decade, I feel compelled
to express my thoughts on this proposal by Canada del Oro LLC from Oklahoma
City.
Back in 1969, as an undergraduate from an eastern university, I spent my
summer exploring some of the western regions of our country. I remember
driving from Phoenix to Tucson, partially on the then two-lane Oracle Road,
(there was no Interstate 10 then) and being astonished by the beautiful Santa
Catalina Mountains and desert terrain in the late afternoon sun. I stopped by
what is now Pusch View Lane (then the Rooney Ranch) to fully take in the scene,
wishing that perhaps someday I could reside in an area as blessed as this!
In 2010, my dream came true, as my wife and I were able to buy a home in la
Reserve. As a trained zoologist, I enjoyed the diversity of the fauna and flora
right around the house and throughout the La Reserve area. However, in the
past several years, I have noticed a very distinct decline in the wildlife in the
area, clearly related to the tremendous development around the La Reserve
area and throughout all of Oro Valley.
One has to wonder when we will start to realize the negative overall impact of
over -development on the quality of life, and reduce emphasis on monetary gain
(especially for those who propose and profit from development but don't live
here) and a slightly increased Oro Valley revenue and tax base. No Oro Valley
resident can deny that the conditions have become vastly overcrowded in this
area in the past several years... just take a look at the traffic on Oracle! It's
interesting that most folks are not native to the Tucson -Oro Valley area, and are
attracted initially to the uniqueness of our desert environment, but over time
through development change the area back to a facsimile of what they were
accustomed to "back home"! The area's uniqueness becomes obscured!
ask the Oro Valley Planning and Zoning Commission and the Town Council to
sit back and seriously consider whether we really need these additional strip
malls (especially given the currently empty ones), hotels ranging between 30
and 75 feet in height, more single-family housing, especially in light of the many
other areas of development in Oro Valley right now, additional traffic and safety
issues, and more requirements on our water, sewer and electrical utilities.
From where is the so-called "market demand" for this proposal coming? Please
remember that once this proposal is approved and implemented, we can never
return to the original pristine condition of this property. In essence, a positive
decision on this proposal will not only diminish our quality -of -life values and our
local natural environment, it robs future generations as well. And for what...
the financial enhancement of certain out-of-town speculators and some
additional tax revenues?
have specifically stayed away from commenting on the details of the proposal,
simply because I am entirely opposed to its basic premise. However, I would
suggest that the following issues be further considered by the Commission and
Council:
• The original charter of Oro Valley specified that there was to be no
construction that disrupted a clear view of the Santa Catalina Mountains
from Oracle Road. Multistoried hotels on PAD 3 are viewing obstacles.
• What is the effect of the worst-case flooding potential along Rooney
Wash, not only to the proposed development structures in PAD 3 but also
to the existing adjacent housing in La Reserve?
• Specifics regarding lighting and noise reduction need to be considered,
both for PAD 3 and Oracle Road adjacent to PAD 4.
• Has a specific species inventory been professionally conducted for PADs 3
&4, together and evaluation of the impact on existing species?
• I am aware that an archeological site assessment was conducted years
ago for the implementation of La Reserve. But methods and techiques
have vastly improved. Since it seems probable that Hohokam habitation
sites were in existence along Rooney Wash and elsewhere, it is important
that a re-evalution be conducted by a professional archeology firm.
• The incremental effect on traffic, especially on Oracle Road, will be
substantial. Any traffic analysis for both Oracle Road and Pusch View
Lane should be done before any proposal approval, not afterwards as
stated in the proposal.
As is evident from my commentary, I do not believe that it is appropriate or
necessary to develop PADS 3 and 4. Instead, I would propose that these areas
be maintained as sanctuaries for people and wildlife as an escape from the
everyday traffic and chaos of Oracle Road and the current shopping complexes.
Paraphrasing Joni Mitchell ,please don't "take paradise and put up a parking
lot!" especially since "we don't know what we have till it's gone"!
MEMO FOR: Oro Valley Town Council
5 March 2019
Subject: Water Proposed for Area 4, Rooney Ranch Development
A major part of the proposal up for approval tonight is the source of water for the 82 homes and
possibly for the eventual development of Area 3. The plan calls for accessing the water line on East
Camino Diestro at two separate easements. The decision in the planning process was based on this line
being the easiest to access and the cheapest.
El Con homeowners and members of our HOA have asked on numerous occasions to include the 5
February P&Z meeting - city staff, Oro Valley Water Utility officials, and representatives of both Mr.
Rooney and Richmond America for specifics as to just how this will be accomplished. We have only
been told that we have no recourse with regard to the usage and that it represents no hydro -
engineering problem. We have never been approached by anyone to my knowledge to discuss these
connections..
We have many concerns. By way of background, the water pipe that serves Camino Diestro is one of
two (as shown in the attachment) which runs from a connection near the traffic light at EI Con Way and
Oracle Road. The other serves our other street, Camino Corrida. Our pipe runs up El Con Way and up
our street for nearly a mile. It is a 35 year old 6" pipe. This means that the two proposed connections
will have to access the pipe across the street and into our common area. Our street will have to be torn
up. While it was established that Camino Diestro - which is private - could not be used for access to the
82 homes, apparently it can be torn up along with the common area without our even being formally
asked.
Our specific concerns are in no particular order:
1. We would like to have it explained by a hydrologist as to just how our 35 year old 6" pipes can
be so accessed and deliver as a minimum twice as much water as they do now without any
changes in current service.
2. Who will actually do the work? We are told it will be a subcontractor of Richmond America.
We would like to know what is involved, approximately when, and certainly for how long it will
take to make the connections. They probably cannot be done at the same time as it would cut
off some 12 homeowners from street access. Our HOA is proposing to resurface our roads in
the near term underscoring our concern as to when this work will be done.
3. Who will be responsible if something goes wrong, e.g. pressure issues especially at the fire
hydrants on Upper Diestro, leaks, possible change in our rates, etc. We feel it only appropriate
that our HOA have a contract or agreement in place establishing responsibility and appropriate
points of contact before any work on this project even begins. Golder Ranch Fire should to be
in the loop now to ensure the requisite pressure to all our hydrants will be maintained at all
times. There is discussion of getting our HOA's lawyer involved in this regard.
4. While probably not affected we want to ensure that the seven irrigation lines off of Camino
Diestro are also not impacted by the connections.
5. Again while probably not involved with this development, we would like assurance that our
sewer lines will not in any way be impacted in any way by the two connections.
I recognize that until the project gets the official go ahead some of our questions cannot be fully
resolved. Nevertheless, that doesn't explain why we haven't been formally contacted. I strongly urge
the Council to ensure we now learn as much as we can about this use of our water line so that we can,
as a minimum, develop appropriate documentation to fully protect us (and the city and developer, I
would think) from all possible complications Thank you for your consideration. I have provided a copy
of my comments and attachment for each of you to your secretary.
Respectfully,
LAWN.•ter
S••y '�. x W ,rr� .0p, tom,
kp
AP
'M1F
.fir,+
vw
y.>n��y#iR���'7 •R, "' �'�� - r �� '4 64,
,q iS wT
ti 7A1• 1
17
i "`• P+ .,:� � .d A � I � 't i icy .Y 4 � t
.bf 'yYAl
} �Cf" _ _ C��{ - �. a► 1 tae`, f
It
ace-
10
+�k +v ► a - i'- - ^cam �k • a
414 Y*
49�
' .rtt�. ���� ,e•� _ .r•• �]` , P ` � !; Y..e• '?4 l - ..s�,. _ 'oma ..
�' ¢-!�„��'i�.• �, � � �''r,�, i.ra�r ` �g cam.,.
.: a�G'., a'4. �� „�.����� �' ,_.fit j!€� �•std. {
mss.. fi _ "t
It
14
Ilk
it -r '_. J7jj{Tf .�, a,� .�:,�j:,+ �+'� f .. ' spa+ ll :may - �.- ;, •o ..
ti. y PI
,4 fit
ate'• « .. l �,. - r,.F `. °i_ q � �' � ).
if
x
.17
fA
40
� � ,._ -i �,� � . � � -.t• ,�, ,:._ Ada ._
Ya�My-A
ti .,,X.r I P" p.� • . ,nor
�� ., " l� fir,. �• —.... � :�` .J.� � f � ',�`�. � - ;it �. ,{ .f .a i. _ �. " ,I� t
�,,� �� '�� �. i� �"� „�.._: ! � 6 • ,,, ^' a r 'iii.^�
or"(4P,p
?kJ�RNkr
t' t
�, ••W„a l -'�Y � .jar. .� _. '-'+' - ^}` .R` �� -
Ak
?i _a. -� > x .. :- �'> _ i• -.raft, r . r _ i .w:•:.ti _.- i`�
TO
112212019
�
Photo - Google Photos
___ _ Vi��/�C�E @ 51LVE2 .HAWK J�1 DSO V�L.LE`(
_5JMI_L�k _I0 �2�1�I:1"�--f����__
• 5�5'• SID�Y��S�v � F'�-Nib1�__0u1� :�c[�tGSi b���ut/-
I-t�T P.u��� �Q5 M�?FQh Hvk�.::No �N_pf�st��E
_��� unG�uFE M�vRaTuN--Po1y5IbL
e: FIRE SUPPR.E551�N Or R.A�.Ii9I' 1 iiL�( '_4�\F`!' MDR --,-pIF_FI�I-L_
�.-I���MIZED--V(EVJ Go�;RIDDiZS _-------_ __
—' �Iy7:NI1ZED F�:DOR pI,AN Po1�NT1AL5
hftwilphoWs.ow0e.coW,charWAFICMPMFWhZAXt-e5DF4PCdletVILAeft!Kt5X44zbo5rof3oMnOFqMrQJZHaWrx9LypYgfphotolAFlaipP1gifit3nAN... IM
i
L
"'fir s "a `c:- z Y t�§-`xrl•€�,�#•rz,�r t�x1
•
c
}
S
i r {
�i �'iy ♦ i ry' �?
cr
ai
us 0
♦ �'t�y�,k' a
CD
I 1A,
! FtiYrN. R /t'1
yr:'r u r- � � +.. • ill J
h :fir
- til+�.' •• 1(�F
.s
c,
' f
.gyp
•.�.' w ry ' fj¢
h+,
' i' 11h tY
�c Alz
7k,,1
N.
� `TS
- - .SQ
rb
L � 1
41
k �
i t
.4 t.
or 0(
F
Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council Hearings- The Rooney Planned Area Development
(PAD)
My name is Jerry Ward, . I have been a part of the EI Con Patio Home Ad Hoc
group meetings with Owners, their Planners and Oro valley Planners for almost a year. We appreciate
the time they have all given.
There are 7 issues that still need review by the city in Area 4 (residential) and in Area 3. Since Area 3
review has been delayed today, I will focus on Area 4 with a more citywide perspective than our Ad Hoc
group's focus which was more from our neighborhood. All the city residents cherish the Catalina Foothill
and Mt. views. Our recently adopted Future Plan and our zoning codes honors this. This PAD also must
be held to these aspirations.
The handout of 12 pages, including Area 3 help illustrate these 7 recommendations.
Area 4:
1) Pages 1,2,3 and 4 illustrate the "wall effect" of 50 ft wide lots with 5 ft side yards and the several
negative effects. Page 4 with red highlights illustrates Rooney proposed lots 29 thru 40
expanded from 50 ft width with 5 ft side yards expanded to 67 ft widths with 11 ft side yards.
There are over 7 benefits(see notes) plus better adherence to the Oracle Rd. Scenic Corridor
Zone and city zoning regs, and is more environmentally sensitive and respective of the Catalina
Foothills and the Mts.
Widening these lots to 67 ft., as one example, only reduces lot number by 3 in the same Rooney
footprint. Existing 2012 PAD has 65 lots with minimum 15,000 sq. ft. lots. 67 ft. wide lots increases
lot sizes to 8,040 sq. ft.; still not close to the PAD required. They are more marketable and offer
many other benefits as noted on each page.
2) Page 4 with the blue highlight proposes reducing the 3 north/south streets in the east quadrant
to 2 streets and having the streets serving homes on both sides and not single loaded as
proposed. This reduces street and utility lengths, thus costs, by 750 ft, and moves project
farther west from the Wash and Flood Plain, and is more environmentally sensitive.
3) Page 5 shows the cut & fill of Area 4 and 3. In Area 4 over 70% of the site west of the Wash is
scalped/regraded with vegetation removal of our scenic foothills. With larger lot sizes some of
the scalping can be mitigated and grading can be more capable with existing topography like the
2012 PAD provided.
Area 3:
4 ) Pages 5 thru 9 illustrates the dramatic negative effects of a proposed hotel in Area 3. With 5 ft of fill,
10 ft of "architectural statements" on top and the proposed building height of 75 ft, the building could
reach 90 ft in height. This, and other possible uses in Area 3 would be contrary to the Oracle Rd. Scenic
Corridor Zone and other city environmental regulations. It would affect what we all appreciate about
Oro Valley ad and Catalina foothills and Mt. views. The height also sets a height precedent for all of Oro
Valley that would be negative.
5) In Area 3 there are many proposed uses from commercial, offices, apartments, condos, retail, and
hotel. This complicates proper planning when a smorgasbord of uses are possible with no clear plan
resulting in various traffic, visual, environmental, water, etc. outcomes. Proper city and public review is
preempted by this poor smorgasbord planning. Public and City review with specific plans should be
required.
6) In Area 3 the Owners are requesting a height increase from 35 ft to 40 ft. With the 5 ft of fill
requested and 10 ft of "architectural statements" allowed, buildings could be 50 ft high. Compare this
to page 10 photo of the 2 and 3 level apartments right to the north of Area 3 that are within the 35 ft
height limit. The photo taken from near the east side of Oracle Rd sidewalk shows how at this height the
views to the foothills and Catalina Mts. are blocked. why is the additional height requested? It is not
needed.
Area 3 and 4:
7) Page 11 and 12 are from Rooney's Traffic Report. Oracle Rd. on average is experiencing
approximately 32,000 daily trips in 2015. Of the three intersections at Oracle near Area 3 and 4 there is
"F" (Failure) level of service at Oracle and ist, and "E" (almost Failure) 13 times at different approaches -
as of a year ago. in less than 4 years "F" level of service reaches a total of 10 at different approaches if
Oracle Rd. and Pusch View Ln Scenario B Mitigations is employed for all the intersections. The traffic
study is basing its numbers on only a 2% annual growth in traffic. -Is this realistic? The traffic study, on
the recommendation of Oro Valley Traffic Engineers and ADOT recommends no improvements are
possible for Oracle Rd and Ist Ave. intersection to mitigate the 8 "F" level of services projected by 2023.
As ADOT's South Region Traffic Engineer James Gomes stated the only solution for all of this "F", failure,
of service is turning Oracle into a freeway with overpasses. He suggested that Oro Valley needs to
consider planning density moderation to help the problem. The suggestions above of fewer lots, less
building heights, etc. helps incrementally towards density moderation.
The Rooney property is an important part of what makes Oro Valley special. The site is unique and
should not be the place of much higher density. Moderation is needed to comply with our several zoning
codes.
Thank You.
-=_- y��� � L_5�vc2_ia�wK_�I� opo
�(���Y_1
AWV�)
_51M1��� TD IZDDN�Y-�(ZED�
• RUN 5 FT. 5 W 5 5 D Y� �U_
• coMPA2E 70 7W�1,CrY NoM�S iU 5W co�fdrK of RoaNL`Y=tiRE� 4
-�R�ATING 5 TIMES WAL�� EFFE�"('� NO �P�iDSGAPING IN SIDLSI�21Y�
'01.0 50 Fi WIDE LDTS vi�W coovi Dog
• ADPKOX,35 5a'WIDEI.D(51rtR00NEY-A2�A 4 CREA11�6 V�I.J-=EFFE�
f�KoP05ED I.oT WI I�1"N5 TD m FFEGT r0� RdoNEY
-` P2�F�R �5 wID5 LUIS W/ 1.5 SI PE'il?y, pC :'vG 45 WIPE HDM�S
__�2ESULTII�G IN30'�AiiD5ARBA BcYWE5IJ HoNIEy, IZEpU�ES NUMBEK
D� NUMES OY 41 RE5UL1"INGi 62 HOMES ReDUGEp To
761 GohlpgR�(�
-TO y012 PAD AUOwiuC, FOR &5 H m LofS 2a 1N12U 40 CµLACZ(,�D.
GoMPIZOM15E:WADE OTS W1 51P 6 PROV-12061 451v�i
12E5U�i1NG 1N
2o'WID6RKEA 6E7WEE�
D� I-IoMES BY 32E5UI.?IN/a IN 82 HOMES fZ6DUGU TO 7q� loTS 2l
'el H2u 40 rklLAn��p,
� 5�E PAGE g FO1�V?,bP06�r) &7FT,WIPEHNFOT5 IIrl', ,�tP W -H
SAMA FOOTPKINTa,5 aUON Y'S ZwEDvE 5oFTw,iDP LO15 V// 5Fr, s�DEY�S.
INGREa51N6 202 Pa.p 01-6 FROM l6 TO 761
hftps://photos.google.com/share/AFIQipMFGdh2AYi-e5DF4pCdletVILA6FbiKt5X44zbO5rOBOMnOFqMrQjZHaWrx9LypYg/photo/AFlQipMIAW3u5Dk...I/l
121 PAID I-fA5
&600 5d, FT, LDT6- PROFUSED oT,� Hlkv�� elLOOO30&7'1 iu'Lt-r6 1�A\v5 G/&1040
y
- t
o
i YY• �d f+".
i
t
C'4
W.
LIN, N, �. •fir �
F: _ — S :r:. sir •r
.. _ND
<
r ^.
f,
�\
.�3 -•k"x'R�:S a� tl.�.t i:c-- y �:Z � � 1R
�M t.•, .
•�r•M�. _i�s.'�, *y �
S
w7
.. L
6
LOt7 r {
cc
CL
to
` 'Jr -
(D
fes'(
z w� h r j i1 • ! f "V
�` y • tr
Y �
r
•r
Ju
nr
im
rn
.+�i[ww � s'.' � � � 4 51�•k r
L y7 ;TII-
jr
'rT f
y^>. '`�' tai �' 11 � �' ` t` t - � � •�:{ �;�;•'
�(' �� �' t+(f �,/ .. _ /} 7 i _c .L,�;'•', _ � 3 �� �Lrr t ,:5: � Vit"
C'� rs�.. u -, <�.�•'Yt y. �' � ,.r 4 "` .:- �._'' '. 'ice-�tS
! � f •� rN
, W
^mer• ^ •':s' r r t:. , :iy�'. i ::t `.
'�=, ���,. �,y� l= '�. y-,.�� - . ter. ^•' `�,
''r?T. ^') ? ,,.t LY.� X ,4^'' • .ai. ' r:}.c a .Y' . -k
Jj
"�""' •ti{•r ��,y G/ _ .tY t I f �'� ,,r�F, r F�r �i.._ LV
•` � •' r' ' u �- ' � - �_, 3 �° � fir_ '_ {� � r - s� tl1
�•�
ice.•
•Y
PK
n -
.r
•t `""t .;i y('' ; ✓s'ti-c.. s �. Al s � i'` r tlY ?. r ' R !� �t` �•qk• •cu
Ilkt :�>• - `
T , Y CF)
N .7
Co
A 1/22/2019
Photo - Google Photos
VILLA6E e 51LVEIZ IYIaWK 10ORD VALI-E`(
51MIi�.2 io I2DdN.EY� AIZ�� �{
6AT
I-f��T PVMP�/bas MATERS l-fvQ�. Nb �PalPScAp�Nc�_�5���
� ��: '�(I I-0 L! �C M ��RATIb N Po551 @ L�
• FIRE RA06F i ;4pM� rU4-0-M--E MD�E PIFFIGUI,i
�:Mi��MtzED viEW coRRi0DR5 — ___
MIIJINIIZED FI,OOIZ PLAN Po1�NTIALS
hftps://photos.google.com/share/AF1 QipMFGdh2AXi-e5DF4pCdletVILA6FbiKt5X44zbO5rOBOMnOFqMrQjZHaWrx9LypYg/photo/AF1 QipPI glfftsnAN... 1/1
% z
ciw
W ul
c::!k
CJ
C!C>
U,)
C -i U,
C
Ci
W---
m �_V/_ -
-L"
Val
9
Qk. C54 N N
04 CL
C-1
IS
lip
l ; .,._.._. ► tea'-• '�� �...
70,
_JA
C -i
cq\'A
w
co I
to IN z
CS,
N
c f
_j
4
< < co
C*4 C4
W I (� W
911 / U.),q - T_ U)
o Oco
CIO C4
x CY
""*� W r; t• fir.• �~ /'/ ``~\ ��' �� /�04— C4
z M♦
•
W z < M yflI& v
f_BRW dr�
0 lAf3PV3SV3 3N(7 -I-VM-
F13
qA Z < U) co co
UJOW < m N
W W 10 cv;
OXW C4
CIA
14 �. zo
ci Z�q"Ol
to
t
C4
cN
7y Ivy Cl) 0 z (1) 0 Z 0)
CD w z < V) I
Z5 ii w w }-DEWO 11
Z<mQ _0 TO)o► t'-1
z W<
CL -eel iv W(gw< w <
New
w
w
W W
<
w
&0
Cd
(b
�2 C4
U) gn
0
LL < im < 4r
C-4
a. LLJ z W �M F- Z
"e 0 W <
C �4
Z z Z D w io W 0 WE 00
WO WO 0 T_;ll w
Z
W Cq
co < CA z
w a. I— o a. W co w Al _J
C -S CO o < 0 0 F- 0 D z C) F -
_j w < < w
w T � o ii CL 0
w (j) 0
> Z w w 00, b P
< WW < >X X<a.< z 11):r B Ul
00 IX w 0 -1 W 0. U /
w o . /
w z , CW) Fw- W D a. 0) LL
w t, _00 CC Ul 0
0 < a — -6 ,
w 0- t
0 w 0 CL UJ -i _T W f CO
a. 0 m iL X U) F- w —Z a.
O mo
o I
w . -i
4 a
0 M >. 3:QY io lk
Of _j w r%
tu co
Ur > 4p Ci rl_
j N x
<�Ns :� ui
z 0 w
z Z M:g
CL 0 Bo
CD
LL;z _j 2
< < 00�_Wo-
-17 LU 00
> _Jzw<rl�ir� �,V/74, ---
4p# m :�_/ V
,41
W z f
XAX
> LIA
<3:awlz--�
< w
a. E:O�Z-wo�-�
C�
_j CO 0 F _)Z LLk
0 a. jo 0 >: W uj:) W (6
z 0 < C-rj) z tr3:200-0 W _-3
0 cc
0 < < W3 (0
CY
0 o LLJ —IT 4*#
20� w
NM
Q'i U. 3: Uj W < :i(nw()OW C6
< > 40
w LU v
z LLI 0- 0 in -
cc �_ I 2.;r
0 aoO< .1e 3 .
w 2 w 0 W o_jz W in
W
----------
#*
• 0 0 w < CL 0 zo-XFXIM
40 0 F- t: W
CL w _j IL 0¢ 0
�4 O!p CLL4
> 0 co o
(f)WF-WOX C�k
OMW
CL Z
w
w
r, ....». , ZZMLJJB5(o
9 4r) -3E- C041
■
Ln F)Wwou
co 0) gwwx:ixo
in <
sz
N47)_
Y
.1 ttt %Q, Z
•+ 4 . r t Stt t � 4 r i '►
a OLL
00..Q
M C4
W W
re
0 0 Q a
z z 0 0
Q O
ci
w w
Q Z z
J 0
Y g ti U u.
U
IM ` O O 0 O
Z W Z W W
a(L (n o z z a a
oul aw
D O Q 0
Q 0 Q W W w w
ED Q Q Q
} u'= Q _�
a~' Q 0 Z X X X X
of o X X a 0- a. aa. aa.
a w a. Q ¢ Q Q
1 i �
_I
7 V Af
/�. ; ,1•�.. rte„ +. •-� ---" �•...r.� • ! 1
47
CO It
S j �
%,► _ter - ;, ^
� � s
t z
ti I
l
Q Q .� t) o
Q
Q2
WNv '� Y '
i W t'" :~Y?S _uttrK O-
+.
a.
o
N
Q t �'► ' t ' /! 0-0
Jt
f I �
wooW
f
ZOQ� ff r / # 1
Q W }- O %
_
wpJW` !
Z UJ
WUJDW
0E- °�
Zw0W i S ,�
> f] 10 ` r +...r 11 . * t
�o_Zw
W o
ow1-F-
Q r.
~Uz
=O
<1/! -i D
g
.1
z� o
u.o W
wv¢z 1 ./ f, 0t
n.0�� �Q
o-J:DW Z -i
}- J U H Q (L
o
F-�Z
w
mtLm
=E -..OJ}:
X Jz=JW
W U-
W < f
=LiJF->
E Z0
u.QZmo
:3o
wzz000 z a000Z
Wo¢aw
< U- LL
a- � its � ,'r ''i�• •; -
.. _���y.L '^(`' `� ���•_� 4 :i i S '•� 4's 4a 'dam ?• ,. f. �: I a ~� c '.
• wt 11,- • � q tit a4� T i'S��� i t 7 �.N: � R s �X f 'y� { - s. l � 4 -� 4 1
r _ + +.t - � t' f -- �i •�r',f 9"' -+3'_t" 1eY►rraas. '�•f... '✓�:%'"ry;�- '�.fi'% - �
r
'r • ,.. ire° y; � #� �r�y.>�'`..• � " xt
r • Y rt -4 L } - i Y . �:.:;* Y -3. F _ '.•�..' ...a ''-.r„� �- 4y.
elm
.��, �'-,. ,, �. `t7.� .-4.'w;µ1. ..� r •�is7"'•Z t� �''r .�� t� �_...�r,.�
Ap
Olt
Oro- Jr Y 'fit '�.. :•'krt. y- - _3 ,
r
=fir
,t
a `...' K
1 �
r
c
1 j
l
f�
.4► s �
i".
n
}
f �Y'�5.� ��• .. l �+:r• yam/¢ �y
3333yyyy'T
�t v. � i+ • , yt��„<t .'3' i.at yr _ 7 - ', ��S•s :^clr.•• •� '-'�.�•dh•:', fYx" O r '{r'lr-'`C`.
.'.w ��`' ..4�t'•r� ��_w�>+;! �J�-`t,:�k'd"'Asri�rta��„j��`t.��.�i.�,' T�� �.•��P
..3Yr�w&�:-,:�►:.fCJl.m.�'�'-!¢�]f,kY.-'4..,...:+�." •�:.s: i...•..:-', .v _:ilii-sf�.. e�•#.'.�.`�...
*f��.�ne �'k r � �Aha'C4`�� f 3. .Cr.� J F,• +a •:.K ��, f' Ie� .r '�.l . , � �-
r ,
K
.c r
/ 3
•i' .. 111))) -
�} e
i
x i
WEI MOM*
y !
7107
o„Y' [s t`) �''., ' `r °3s t i{'yr*` arc 1.'•`i;s l� j�
.�� - � 1.:. � *'" , rS�r �n��'4{'1!!�f er _,�.��.1"-�rD CYt � l��• ri Si:• --. aL�._
.. ,, r - t �v �i iry?� s14'C+�Tfk 'a�P � X'E3 �i. .' ,• i
- r � l� �f-r' .}..�'•r" •%'Cr�k��'.:�f+�� ij�. _ �,:i`rd'J JtJ
t il►_
r �� � i
LIS
UIT
I -IS
z
0
-Z
C>
C -Q
co -
W,
LL
LLrT - -3 q\ W
4 &4 -
LL-
cy
caCho-
-4o. C—
Als q
S.,
I Cl.
<3
\fN
LL
CL
ti
0
2
CL
C11-
x
0
.0
c
cu
cn
C --
m
E
E
0
a
0
Ecu
Z:z
�i
CL
I
UL
LO
fl-
ui
W
U-
0
2
w
A ,I-
I'llOro Valley Town Center Development —Oro Valley, Arizona Traffic Impact Analysis (D
Table 3 — Existing Peak Hour Levels of Service
All existing study intersections are expected to operate with an overall passing
approach level of service (LOS D or better), with the exception Ofor the westbound
approach at Oracle Road and First Avenue in the PM peak hour. `' � `� ����U pG 5��+,(I�
The intersection of Oracle Road and First Avenue experiences heavy delays in the
westbound approach during the AM Peak hour due to the allocated green time and
minimal westbound approach volumes. Additional mitigation for this intersection is not
recommended under existing conditions. It should also be noted that the westbound
approach experiences an overall delay of 58.0 seconds in the AM peak which is only
3.0 -seconds from the 55.0 -second LOS D threshold.
17 Oro Valley Town Center
CIVTeCh
November 2018
Stop
Existin
LOS
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
ID
Intersection
Control
Approach
Left
i Thru
Righ t
Overall
Left
Thru
Rs ht
Overall
NB
E
A
B
E
A
B
1
Oracle Rd &
Signal
SB
B
B
B
B
B
B
Pusch View Ln.
EB
D
E
D
D
E
D
Overall
C
B
NB
E
z B
A
C
E
B
B
C
Oracle Rd &
SB
E
C
C
C
E
C
C
C
2
First Ave
Signal
EB
F
D
C
D,
E
D
D
D
WB
E
A
E
E
E
= A
D
D
Overall
C
C
Shopping
NB Shared
B
B
B
B
B
B
B =
B
3
Center
-way SLUp
SB Shared
C
C
C
B
B
B
B
B
Driveway &
(NB/SB)
EB Left
A
A
A
-
-
A
Pusch View Ln.
WB Left
A
A
A
A
All existing study intersections are expected to operate with an overall passing
approach level of service (LOS D or better), with the exception Ofor the westbound
approach at Oracle Road and First Avenue in the PM peak hour. `' � `� ����U pG 5��+,(I�
The intersection of Oracle Road and First Avenue experiences heavy delays in the
westbound approach during the AM Peak hour due to the allocated green time and
minimal westbound approach volumes. Additional mitigation for this intersection is not
recommended under existing conditions. It should also be noted that the westbound
approach experiences an overall delay of 58.0 seconds in the AM peak which is only
3.0 -seconds from the 55.0 -second LOS D threshold.
17 Oro Valley Town Center
CIVTeCh
November 2018
Oro Valley Town Center Development — Oro Valley, Arizona Traffic Impact Analysis
The levels of service presented in Table 9 below are based on the anticipated proposed
lane geometry and stop control in Figure 12. The overall intersection and approach
levels of service, resulting from this analysis are summarized in Table 9 for horizon year
2023. The Synchro analysis summary sheets for horizon year 2023 are included in
Appendix H
Table 9 — 2023 Synchro Intersection Capacity Analysis Summary
By horizon year 2023 all study intersections are expected to operate with an acceptable
level of service (D or better) under the proposed mitigated Scenario B lane
configurations as shown in Figure 12, with the exception of Oracle Road and First
Avenue and Shopping Center Driveway and Pusch View Lane.
The intersection of Oracle Road and First Avenue experiences an overall delay of
55.4 -seconds (LOS E) in the AM peak hour. The eastbound approach experiences a
delay of 129.4 -seconds (LOS F) in the AM peak hour and 67.1 -seconds (LOS E) in the
PM peak hour. The westbound approach experiences a delay of 77.5 -seconds (LOS E)
in the AM peak hour and 83.4 -seconds (LOS F) in the PM peak hour. The combination
of large northbound and southbound through volumes with large eastbound and
westbound turning volumes produces greater delay for the eastbound and westbound
approaches.
The intersection of Shopping Center Driveway and Pusch View Lane experiences
acceptable levels of service for all movements with the exception of the southbound
shared movement in the PM peak hour which experiences a delay of 35.8 -seconds
(LOS E). 11 1]
;: CivTech
35
Oro Valley Town Center
November 2018
Stop
2023 AM PM Peak Hour LOS
Background
Total
ID
Intersection
Control
Approach
Left
Thru
Right
bverall
Left
Thru I'
R �ht Overall
NB
F(F)
C(C)
B(B)
C(C)
F(F)
C(C)
B(B)
C(D)
Oracle Rd &
SB
E(E)
D(C)
A(B)
D(C)
E(F)
F(D)
A(B)
D(D)
1 B
Pusch View Ln.
Signal
EB
F(F)
A(A)
F(F)
F(F)
F(F)
A(A)
F(F)
F(F)
(Scenario B)
WB
E(E)
E(E)
E(E)
E(E)
F(F)
E(E)
E(E)
E(E)
Overall
D(D)
D(D)
Oracle Rd &
NB
F(F)
C(D)
B(A)
C(D)
F(F)
D(C)
A(B)
D(D)
Pusch View Ln.
SB
E(E)
D(D)
A(C)
D(D)
E(E)
D(D)
C(A)
D(D)
113
(Scenario B
Signal
EB
E(D)
A(A)
D(C)
D(D)
D(E)
A(A)
C(D)
D(D)
Mitigated)
WB
.-E(D)
E(E)
C(E)
D(D)
D(E)
E(E)
E(D)
D(D)
Overall
D(D)
D(D)_
NB
E(E)
C(C)
B(A)
C(D)
E(E)
C(C)
B(B)
C(D)
Oracle Rd &
SB
E(E)
D(D)
C(D)
D(D)
E(E)
D(D)
B(C)
D(D)
2
1 st Ave
Signal
EB
F(F)
E(F)
F(D)
F(E)
F(F)
E(F)
F(D)
F(E)
WB
F(F)
A(A)
E(F)
F(F)
F(F)
EE
E(E)
E(F)
Overall
D(D)
Shopping
NB Shared
B(C)
B(C)
B(C)
B(C)
3
Center
2 -way stop
SB Shared
C(D)
C(D)
C(E)
C(E)
Driveway &
(NB/SB)
EB Left
A(A)
A(A)
A(A)
A(A)
Pusch View Ln.,
WB Left
A(A)
AA) I
A(A)
A(A)
By horizon year 2023 all study intersections are expected to operate with an acceptable
level of service (D or better) under the proposed mitigated Scenario B lane
configurations as shown in Figure 12, with the exception of Oracle Road and First
Avenue and Shopping Center Driveway and Pusch View Lane.
The intersection of Oracle Road and First Avenue experiences an overall delay of
55.4 -seconds (LOS E) in the AM peak hour. The eastbound approach experiences a
delay of 129.4 -seconds (LOS F) in the AM peak hour and 67.1 -seconds (LOS E) in the
PM peak hour. The westbound approach experiences a delay of 77.5 -seconds (LOS E)
in the AM peak hour and 83.4 -seconds (LOS F) in the PM peak hour. The combination
of large northbound and southbound through volumes with large eastbound and
westbound turning volumes produces greater delay for the eastbound and westbound
approaches.
The intersection of Shopping Center Driveway and Pusch View Lane experiences
acceptable levels of service for all movements with the exception of the southbound
shared movement in the PM peak hour which experiences a delay of 35.8 -seconds
(LOS E). 11 1]
;: CivTech
35
Oro Valley Town Center
November 2018
