HomeMy WebLinkAboutPackets - Council Packets (1066) AGENDA
ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL
STUDY SESSION
JUNE 8, 2005
ORO
VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS
11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE
CALL TO ORDER: 5:30 P.M.
ROLL CALL
1. PRESENTATION OF THE DRAFT GENERAL PLAN UPDATE AND
THE STRATEGIC IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
ADJOURNMENT
The Town of Oro Valley complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
any type of accommodation, please notify
needs
If any person with a disability
the Oro Valley Town Clerk, at 229-4700
POSTED: 06/03/04
4:30 p.m.
lh
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
MEETING DATE: June 8, 2005
TO:• HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL
Administrator EN �`�,T...,T ��� ���i.AICP, Planning and Zoning _ .
FROM: Bryant Nodine,
SUBJECT:: PRESENTATION OF THE DRAFT GENERAL PLAN UPDATE AND THE
STRATEGIC
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN: ADDENDUM
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The comment letter from Catherine Balzano with the Arizona State Land Department (ASCD) is attached.
Gordon Taylor, the Planning Section Manager of the
'
I've also attached a September 2002 letter from
us for meetingwith the ASLD and provides the ASLD
ASLD at that time. In that letter,Mr. Taylor thanks
position did include an SRA designation over the
' 'on regarding the State Lands. In summary, their
posits g g
recommended to you this evening matches the ASLD position
whole of the area and most of what is being
in Mr. Taylor's letter.
The areas that do not match (portions of the Master Planned Community [MPC] and Traditional
Neighborhood Development [TND]) were discussed by the General Plan Steering committee. That
in the proposed General Plan to replace the TND
committee recommended the land use designationsp p . . -
Mixed-Use Neighborhood in the Plan) with MPC and to create a transition from the low density
(termed
RLDR in the south and west to the
higher density MPC in the northeast.
subsequent two and a half years, with changes es in the Arizona Preserve Initiative options and in
the g
In
appears to have changed. Their position is likely to continue to
ASLD personnel, the ASLD's position pp
evolve as we implement the process planningrocess is recognized in the proposed Policy 3.1.3, namely:
The Town shall pursue annexation of the
state land north and east of Sun City, and work with the
State Land Department to create and adopt a conceptual development plan for the area.
Attachments:
1. State Land Department letter dated June 2, 2005
p7
2. State Land Department letter dated September 27, 2005
response to State Land Department dated October 11, 2002
3. Town 7
-, i k.:),.._il
} . v.. 1,_ r ,--,4
Planni r frnA nd Zonin dm,nistrator ,E
r f .<.,.,_,_, ( e 1
- '',,,,,t,Az,...4 I ,--------, ./c-, I
t , ,
Co.' I►. Develo fent Director
/
F:\PROJECTS\GP2001\Post Election\Staff Reports\GP Update to TC 060805 0 / /4
Town Manager
addendum.doc
-;
A1r1Lzo1111
Janet Napolitano
/ Z 9
Governor AMA
� � o l✓*�� A
anti Depa�� men ,d..: ,,r ","�
ss
Mark Winkleman
State Land
Commissioner ner 177 North Church, Suite 1100 Tucson,AZ 85701 www.land.state.az.us
•
June 2, 2005
Mayor Paul Loomis, Vice-MayorBarry
Gillaspie, Council Member Paula Abbott, Council Member Kenneth Carter,
Council Membery
Conn Culver, Council Member Helen Dankwerth, and Council Member Terry Parish
Town of Oro Valley
11000 North La Canada Drive
Oro Valley, Arizona 85737-7015
RE: State Trust Land in Proximity to Oro Valley/ General Plan Update
Dear Mayor Loomis and Council Members,
P
The Arizona
State Land Department (ASLD) and the Town of Oro Valley share a common interest—that is,
several thousand acres of State Trust land north/northwest of the Town's incorporated area. It was at the first
public hearing
on the Oro ValleyGeneral Plan update before the Planning Commission that I announced the
opening of ASLD's Southern Arizona Real Estate Office. (That's where I had an opportunity to meet several of
you.)ASLD's Tucson office will be addressing State Trust issues in Pima County, Southern Pinal County, Santa
Cruz County, and Cochise County.
' planningarea [for thegeneral plan update] includes the subject Trust land, but I must advise you that
Oro Valley's ASLD neither participated in the development of the plan nor agreed to the land uses that are currently being
proposed and represented on the land use map. At this time, ASLD would prefer that there be no land uses
designated
on the Trust land. This change would eliminate the creation of community expectations toward future
use (or non-use) of the property.
respectfullyI suggest su est that references to residential density, open space or"significant resource area" in addressing
Trust land be eliminated altogether from both the map and the text, and that the Town show the area as a
the to identify growth area" or a similar designation in order the need for future planning. ASLD would prefer to
conceptually plan lan the State Trust land in accordance with Arizona's Growing Smarter statutes and integrate its
final plan into the community's vision through a general plan amendment (GPA). This would involve our joint efforts
a mutuallyacceptable plan. The Southern Arizona Office has scheduled a conceptual plan for
toward developing P
the"Oro Valley Area" in Fiscal Year 07. (The attached map shows the proposed study area.)
Such a strategy provides an opportunity for the Town to work directly with ASLD, the landowner, to create a
suitable palettegeneral of land uses. The resulting plan would then move through public review as part of the GPA
process andsubsequently would subse uentl be refined by the Oro Valley planning staff--similar to the Houghton Area Master
Plan createdCity
bythe of Tucson for the"Houghton Road Area," a large area of Trust land conceptually planned
about five years ago.
ASLD understands the Town's desire to annex this land. It is important to remember that future use of the Trust's
land,
described bythe GPA and further secured through an agreement between the Town and the State Land
Commissioner,
is critical to obtaining the Commissioner's permission for the Town to annex any of this land. I look
you to
workingwith in charting the course for this important resource to the Town of Oro Valley and to the
Trust beneficiaries.
Respectfully submitted,
0_5„ A. 1/4 cz•
Catherine Balzano
Planning Coordinator
Copies: Bryant Nodine, Planning &Zoning Administrator; Scott Nelson, Special Projects Coordinator
"Serving Arizona's Schools and Public Institutions Since 1915"
/
a1
`" -
.0 -P ?-.. . ,. '.\.. .
i 0
0•
•
o
E' E s''`----`-• ' ' ' -..' . "------'---,. cz.
A, { w s: E. \
Z
�• +� o
NC% •.,.) , ca,0
- \\\NN\I'\•,. = , (r) ,
•
LS ,
klk\k\,,,cm.
... ,.._kok'N'4,(6. .
illi..7_... •
\..1- ,.*:,::.x'.:",.... .,::•:,,.-:.'-'.";.:.:,:..-'::...:::,,i,..,,...-.1.4
...--..,., 1b.... \ .. . ii:Nlill IN -
,„,...., ii: --.: ...--..,,,,-,4,,,.----, .----:.tli
• ._... ___,.,---*--- ,.- \ - \ -- -N., - ". _ N.Nok
•
1..........---.-----i,„8,,,,1 '1'1: ::‘..,'''':.:41 „..',...„..,
.' '.* \ \ -f * \\--,..*\ \. /'.:4*%
\ .\ Z \
:1'>-=: \, N •
. ___
03 t INI141:1,.\\\ ',< A,*,,t‘i'\\\ \ .- a....... \ 0 -
.7----- IIMA. \--___I-7.P4-= \< ',.-A, •
•
\cD ___I\ ./..----'---'\,..... c
Cv \ • ' -1
r-- 1-1s1:\&\‘‘
./ --- 'r)-\\c '\\‘' '. \_)\,,\\\N - ,,,,,,,--• . > I \ .f
M\ _,, \ +.,„„.\\:,_.---...:712,
,,,• 1 I.•-_,..\-'1U-\\MN 's. . ',
0
..' - 7---- . ,t11\\a\<ii..\\-\\\ •,,-
` . 1`•=
,\,:kii.:1 .--3 .
/ . \\<\n\Q).'... ,
/ . ..--\
,,,,,
1 . \,r„,,,,,,,, .,N... .„,.\\k,\
/ . , \Y„,),.*\,,,,c)--,,Nos,„_\:, N,,,,.:.. 0
.. __,..._ _
---„, . ri...,..,.1 '''\\
,wg.+�' , .. ....._____
,......_.
,•
........
i Ute► S 6:. ----- _. -.........______......... - ... 4
.„.\\,,.....,,.7.,.: -,
\\,,,,,,., ... :\ ',:.1/4.s.,.
NN
41 i
,./.' t:. 1. \\ .\., .,,:,:,:;‘,‘,,:l..,,,,,:. -., , 1
�: ,��7 ' \ \- .s...-- y, t
r
--.:: :':--':;:::::.-1.
ri
'5
.. ,
_,,,, \ ,,,,..,..,,11
i- .
�.� 'y
,.
, `�,v,,
- ,„,-,
.,,,
.,,,,„,
. ,,
--\ -\:,,,, ,,,,,.,,.--, - - 1 r------
i _.
. ...
. ,...,._ ,
.. — \\\\:\ \\\
t,
.,
...
\ \ \.„ --lit . , %, N.\\ ,,.\\\,\\ *;:-. _ I
s
— - rs,.a .,x .,..�. � k ` i 4 \ � ".. .
r
- 14kkl ' .'''' .';',-;.. ,. 4.8 V1.1i:t,--. -rr,
r----.,'—_F,,.�,,
NI -'''''''''. -'''''' 14,,,„,,.- ','-:.,-,-; ,:', ;' :::::'-- ts-::1 ;: ,.---1
, – '.. .--,‘.,:...‘, '..:„.;:t.,,,,----''777-',,,
4::,,,I,.,
1
i �,n
9f . . s "NtS3 � 1 . 1,,,
:'n •, sh
: ,....._____----
;,,
.---,,,, . ' tt,',.. ..,,,'„,-.,. ,..‘ .
;,:,,,,,,,*_,..,_,J
, - :,,. .. , ,.:., -,,,, , , -,,.-....4:444.1,4% \
r O
Z4'.01'......-1 °-
,.. II:; .., •:'' •.:;:;',.:::,?.:4 if.:7::.'.' ' 1'
/i-zagyKy y %.
--. iii .,}74',:',,,, ?%
n �'
r '
L
1
k'
Arizona
I�r�
Atfc
Hull
Jane Dee u
Governor State De-parimeni
I �= t
Michael E. Anable
State Land
n 1616 West Adams Street Phoenix, AZ 85007 www.land.state.az.us
Commissioner ,.
SEP 302002
September 27, 2002
Mr. Bryant Nodine, Planning Administrator
Oro Valley Planning Department
11000 North La Canada Drive
Oro Valley, Az 85737
RE: Oro Valley General Plan Updates
Dear Mr. Nodine;
Thank you for meeting withrecently
us to discuss the State Trust Lands encompassed by the
Town's General PlanUpdatestudy boundaries. The intent if this letter is to document our
discussion and ASLD's position regarding these Trust lands:
g
1) The Land Department, in
a letter dated August 13, 2002, objected to the designation of
these lands on the draft land use plan as a special resource area without a backup land use
of one (1) unit per acre as required by ARS 9-461.06
designation of a inlnlmum dwelling
(M). Per our discussion,cussion the Department prefers a cross-hatching pattern for the area
showing both the Special Resource Area and the underlying uses we discussed (see
attached State Trust land use graphic).
2) A further definition of land uses in this area will be possible when Oro Valley's
Arizona Preservepp
Initiative application is addressed by the State Land Commissioner.
nit to comment and please telephone me at (602)542-2647 if
Thank you for the further opportunity
you
havequestions or require further information.
any
Sincerely
frf 0 m
ddpi
Ff' 7
Gordon S. .aylor
Plannin ,Section Manager
Enclosure
"Serving Arizona's Schools and Public Institutions Since 1915"
'T ,•#Y-0°. *
,
*
1 4*.x.41
1,' /7-'-'77'..-A.''''''''.:'''''f",;.',:',',',!,!,'t,!:::'•'''''''''''''',*',!,,:f ,t?,:4
,,,,,,,,,,,..„,„),
• .' ',''',"''s:(1,„,. ' '''''''''''''' Obi' ''. 10t/b/(3)v':_: V,,,,,t,,,, ,,:::,.-47c,,t4.4%,4p4tior
1e4.14:,11-"tii:'15,--'II 4VitivittstiNIN
..,.47141,- X.,-.,:,",',,,---<7:--,' 'ri'--,4}tr-'1.'' '1%,', ''• '''''''''''' '-'-'
f,,..:';',4?*:t!•-,4f7, 4't'l.'''''''' 1,' '1117'-'. ,'-''''' ' ' `,, '
,..-7,:i.,441.1WV;;;;.- X'1,1;1'•::-''-';,::,,•:-,40,*::-,..,,*-.,,,' , i , ,,
,,,,c-r. ''''. ,--• _ '',' , •-7'..,,,--r,-..,,,----,e4.-!i-77', '.'-- '' - _-,-..,-.-:.__,..:,-_-_-,T,
/ : -
,‘ .,„ ,, ,, .._ ,
',--,1-;,, , „'-'-'--17 , - ' '
/
..:.
:.,
..,..- _
..,. ,........
, ..---
---- -- - , - .,--..,-.,---...,- ' . -'.. ../,:.•-•,./1 ''''. - ,,,', ,,'.,..',-,,:.,4',,k,,-,.-.'-- ' -- , ---- --,.. 1 1.
,_ ,,,,,,,.... --.. , ..., • ',,-,, _, , , , , ,,,. , ,,,_'„.- ' -, ,, ;.-, ,,,:,./iirei-- - , , , .
I
.., , ,..
i_, , • . 4, / , •,,,._ :,,,,,,,„-,,, ,,,,, , .. , 7 ,, ,, , ,,- .... ,: , ,
- - ,401, :.”-
„- ,'. .:,___A-a,r,r-'7,-..._:: — ' -''- ',.•. '-- - ...`;-,,,I...• ''' - ', -' ,,---:',,''';'.„. ,5-4,1::-:':;-:ii-z,--,,,:'-': , - ' , ,, : .-1../
/
/
.., ......._-
I i
'',,,,,,1;44:iii:Y;-::' •1.''''' r' '' t' ' ''' ''' '- '''''''':11;' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' <1..-'?'-' '' '2.
,
,,,,,, , _ : ,' ,.,-- ., ,,'• „' i '•
'',..,...... .- '.
/
** '' , , , ,' ,'.',--:<-:-_ j• ' ,, ,`:-.:',''''''' / ' '
/
' '_ - :: :'• 4 ' ' '' '
/
1: 7:::-
.. ,,„„,.. ,.... _ ,,,
. ' ,, „ , , .
:, ,...
, , , ,
, ..,. .
,. _ ,
/
. , , , „,..,.. •.
, 4 ,
, .t....
. 1
... , ,
,
,.
_ - „ .1",, '---- s---
.
' 1 .. ,._,..,
-'/
4 c
'
1
, ,-- -0,41.01*.Y#•,,,,'—'1,,, „'.. ' flit ' ' .
” ,, s , ,..,,,,,,TC:2'..-',',,',:,',1:4•ItC,-;;1:-'> ','1,,, sAr--„.11,___ -' i ".,
' ' ' , ' '•,:-.t:''',,',-;',..,'In','It'''''' '''''::7;:'''4 - ' ' ______I-*4r-- —., .--.--I.
' •• ' ' -''''''';:.7.'''-'-:"I''H":'''' ' -' ' ..* / '---1 '-... - '''''.--—
. - , , , . v,',,._- ,- .. , ,1 .•,, :if-'..._;.-7,7:„ I f r ., ......_
,.
. /il i , i,...... , 4 t_..
- - ...„,,,,k . J
--".\ 1
—474„,,,
„,,, -'7%14 / i
f';'-''''sCti,-,4-71g,07, i
t ,--- ) \\ ,, 7
'.--..,' , ,----' .....--:C...:::::' ...1 .., ‘ _.//
, , , , ' ,,_`..t•'-:''''C''''%•?2,,:.!,!,',i';-:'''''''''''''''' i f''''''Ct.' ' / '': ' .....'-
, ,, _ • , ' ' _ , .-,' ,..,„ /
I 1 .,
l
; . , • ,',.. ( 1 c --"---1-------
C._______...,.•
ii ...”" i
° ' 1 , ' -".
, , 1 1 ' (
• ' ',.,„,,,• . •
et, '. ,-..
l'2 ' ' l I
.>
'
„ ,,
X.;
, -t
".• -' Ii
7L-`-• a, ,_„ , „,,...! 1 :
,.
' __
::::.',' 1, i''sT, —,
, ..
A •
...--, i 16'As”' ilk
„.....:... .,..
_.,._
,,..s._
„-'--.',-,------ -
,... , —
o,
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
�P .R% NT DEPARTMENT
o - Lfi o COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
.� - : Planning and Zoning • Building Safety
�+ Valle AZ 85737•(520)229-4800•Fax(520)742-1022
11000 N.La Canada Drive,Oro y,
Oro Valley Public Library
,�_%:,,.:.r-.nx.�- ,� �: 1305 W.Naranja Drive,Oro Valley,AZ 85737• (520)229-5300•Fax(520)229-531
9
Parks and Recreation
°UN
DEO A93 680 W.Calle Concordia,Oro Valley,AZ 85737•(520)229-5050•Fax(520)797-2202
October 11,2002
Mr. Gordon S. Taylor
Planning Section Manager
Arizona State Land Department
1616 West Adams Street
Phoenix, AZ 85007
Dear Mr. Taylor:
Thank you for working
with us on the General Plan Update, and for meeting with
me regarding your property. I've attached the map we sent to the Planning and Zoning
their hearingon October 15, 2002. That map shows the location, your
Commission for lease
request,the staff recommendation, and the Steering Committee recommendation. P
continue to visit www.update2020.com u date2020.com for information about this and future hearings.
p
Alsop lease contact me if you have any questions or comments.
Respe► fully,
4►B : - 1 odine, AICP
Planning and Zoning Administrator
bnodine@orovalley.net
(520) 229-4807
www.townoforovalley.com
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
MEETING DATE: June 8, 2005
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL
FROM: Bryant Nodine, AICP Planning and Zoning Administrator
SUBJECT: PRESENTATION OF THE DRAFT GENERAL PLAN UPDATE AND THE
STRATEGIC IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
BACKGROUND
After the first update was not ratified in the November 2003 election, the Council appointed a citizen
• Revision Committee (URC), to address issues that were identified in
committee the General Plan Update
post-election surveys. That committee presented the results of their work to the Planning and Zoning
In February, with the Commission's concurrence,
Commission and the Town Council in January. the Plan
was sent out for 60-dayreview by State, Federal and surrounding jurisdictions. During that period the
.
Town held two open houses and sent out press releases to solicit public comments.
April 5, the 60-day review period ended and, on April 7, the Revision Committee met to consider the
comments. At that date they made
the recommendations they have presented to the Commission and the
Council (see the attached minutes and the comments from the 60-day review).
publichearing
On April 26 the Commission held a at Sun City and on May 9 they held another at the
Church of
the Nazarene on Calle Concordia(see the attached draft minutes).
SUMMARY
shows the changes draft plan presented with this report to the plan since the November 2003 election
initial revisions presented in January are in red (with some corrections to those in
as follows: 1) the initial URC
revisions, made after the 60-day review, are shown in blue; and 3) the
black); 2) the second set of URC
additional PlanningZoning
and Commission recommendations are shown in green.
The changes since the January Study Session are summarized below.
Acknowledgements. This section has been updated.
Process. The process of the update
since the November 2003 election has been added after the Preamble
section.
Amendments. The findings
section was revised to emphasize consistency with the Plan.
Land Use Map. The URC addressed two areas that were affected by the removal of back-up designations.
g
D. Krei h Park, the URC revised the map to replace the School designation
On the property just east of J.
Park designation. This was because the school designation was no longer
with a Commerce/Office gn purpose was to attract Pima Community College, which has already
considered valid as its original purp
secured a site in the northwest area. Regarding Re ardin the Steam Pump Ranch Area, the URC elected to forward
"takeupat their level to achieve the preservation goals of the Town." The
it to the Commission to this .
shows the historic site portion as open space, with a Community and
Commission recommendation
—ra
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2
� remainder and with a Significant Resource Area designation
e Tonal Commercial designation over the �
Regional
overlaying the whole area.
policy was added to the Plan and the Strategic Implementation Plan to ensure that all public
Policies. A p y
projects are reviewed art by the Public Art Review Committee. Another policy was added to pursue the
• the Town and to plan that area with the State Land Department.
annexation of the State land north of
Other policies were clarified.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
a comment letter from the U.S. Fish and.Wildlife Service
After the Commission hearings Staff received
(attached). p We also anticipate at letter from the State Land Department.
Attachments:
1. General Plan, as amended on May 20, 2005
2. Strategic Implementation Plan, as amended on May 20, 2005
g p
3. April 7, 2005 Draft Update Revision Committee Minutes
4. April 26, 2005 Draft Commission Special Session Minutes
5. May9, 2005 Draft Commission Special Session Minutes
)6)A.7..... ._,.
6. USF&W letter dated May 10, 2005
7. Comments from the 60-Day Review Period /
Planni c_ a N,, Zoning Administrator
r
) ic\\)13 .\' , ` /
IfCo I evelop r-nt D • r
T4110r,
.
r
/ I
. ager
F:\PROJECTS\GP2001\Post Election\Staff Reports\GP Update to TC 060805.doc
MINUTES
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE REVISION COMMITTEE
THURSDAY,APRIL 7, 2005
TOWN OF ORO VA
LL,-,0
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT—HOPI ROOM
11000 NORTH LA CANADA DRIVE
TO ORDER: 6:3 5 .,.41111111‘...
CALL p.m. ,�.,0„,
NT: Bill Adler
PRE— .::,
Teree Bergman ` h ::::..
r' '�
Carl Boswell
Don Chatfieldr:::::::::,..
CarlKuehn :::..,:v:::.:::.::::::.
Doug McKee )11114,„,:„.. {Rosalie Roszak r }
Brent Sinclair
ol
Pat
Ed TaSpczaernowsky
.,v,,,"„. ..,""4:11411111111111116%,—. '''''''
ABSENT: Robert Delaney
M .:r.
• lod'ine Plannin and Zoning Administrator
ALSO PRESENT. Bryan g
Jennifer Joos Recording Secretary
ITEM I. REVIEW MINUTES OF
THE JANUARY 27, 2005 JOINT STUDY
;S��S
ION WITH THE PLAT NTNG AND ZONING COMMISSION
'ned to t'''"1:iii':'1'1:111,,ii;i:;t:::„: he Committee that since the January 27 meeting was
Mr. Smc�a��xplai
joint annin and Zonin Commission, this item is a
a meetlg with the g g
« ` ` Plannin and Zonin Commission will officially
,,,,,,,,,":!::;0•4
review of rrlutes only, the g g
tes since theyare the more senior standing Commission.
approve the m
>.ii{ihi�•
ITEM II. REVIEW,DISCUSSION
AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING
COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM THE 60-DAY GENERAL PLAN
REVIEW PROCESS
Mr. Nodine rev
ie
the comment letters or comments received from the two March Open
Houses.
' mment letter re ardin back-up land use designations:
In response to Mr. Jim Secan s co g g
MOTION: Committee Member McKee MOVED to change the land use designation
to Commercial/Office Park (COP). Committee Member Taczanowsky
S
ECONDED the motion. Motion carried (5-4, Committee Members
Kuehn, Adler, Bergman and Chatfield opposed).
In response to the comments submitted by Don Bristow via the General Plan website, regarding
s onso.red projects should be reviewed and approved by the DRB to assure
the artwork for Town p p �
is compatible with surrounding developments:
appearancep
Chatfield MOVED developa policy that would be
MOTION: Committee Member p
incorporated into the Strategic Implementation Program that all public
g
through the public art committee. Committee Member
art projects go g
Roszak SECONDED the motion. Motion carried (8-1, Committee
Member Taczanowsky opposed).
In response to a comment expressed at one of the
Area" in the PlanniOpen Houses, "Don't include the "Tortolita
ng Area:
., wsk MOVED to leave the area the way it i
MOTION: Committee Member'�'acario y
s
in the recommended updated lan.. Committee Member Chatfield
SECONDED the motion. Motion carried (9-0).
In response to a comment letter received from PlanningResources to re-designate the property
south of the Ironwood RidgeHigh Hi 1 School to low density residential 0.4-1.2 dwelling units per
acre:
` Member Boswell MOVED to recommend no change.
MOTION: Commitee Me
ittee Member Ber man SECONDED the motion.
�o g
Motion carried(8-1, Committee Member Adler opposed).
riot
G. Stafford, P.E. regarding changes and
In response to,the comment form received from Marving
p
Council involvement to make sure the Plan is supported.
No motion was made. All comments will be/or have been forwarded to the Town Council.
County Development Services, which says they
In response to a letter received from Pima C y p
appreciate all that the
Committee has done and the policies,however they are disappointed in the
decrease within growth areas and the deletion of mixed use.
change to easily intensity
MOTION: Committee Member Taczanowsky MOVED to recommend no change.
Committee Member Chatfield SECONDED the motion.
Motion carried (9-0).
School District
In response to the comment letter from Amphitheaterregarding changing the
inbe a heavilyweighted criteria and in 6.2.3 strengthen the
lan ua e 6.1.2 to reflect that schools g .
g gcit exists should be a prerequisite to any land use
lan uage that"A finding that sufficient capacity g
decision which will increase student enrollment.
Member TaczanowskyMOVED to recommend Committee to leave the
language as
is on 6.1.2 and 6.2.3 The word criteria will be corrected to
read"criterion". Committee Member Spoerl SECONDED the motion.
Motion carried (9-0).
ITEM III. REVIEW,DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ANION REGARDING
COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM THE TWO`MARCH OPEN HOUSES
ee Memers that were able t� atten
Mr. Sinclair expressed his appreciation to the Com it d the
the citizens that did come to the':.Open Houses had some idea
two Open Houses, and stated that •
were prepared to discuss the.plan Mr' Sinclair reported that the
of what the plan was and they •
Citizens stated that theyvoted against the plan the first time around, so it was
majority of the p
very helpful for them
to speak with members of staff and the Committee members
and talk about
specific issues.
n Housed vvas the opportunity for the
Mr. Sinclair stated that the most helpful aspect of the ope pp .
• • Committee Members on what their position is and why we are going
Citizens to hear from the
withrevision Mr. Sinclair feels that the citizens that did attend went away
through this revision.process.
with some satisfaction,
Committee Member Adler stated that there is a 1
ack of confidence that the General Plan
serious . 'Mr. Adler suggested recommending to the Town Councilto
document would be t�.ken ythe
neral Planpreamble statement, "Follow and consistently apply
add the language froom the Ge . .
" Office. e believes that this "tool"would help with credibility
General flan to the Oath o
issuer and would turn the lack of confidence around.
informedthat he looked upwhat the oath of office
Committee Mnber Kuehn the Committee
used to be in theearlier years in Oro Valley and stated that there was language that stated"to
abide bythe rules and codes of Oro Valley".
intrust
• terms of lookingfor tools to address the issue,
Committee Member Chatfield agreed that
should be looked into,however, he felt this is outside the scope of what
Mr. Adler's was one that
Committee and suggested making a motion for the Council consider
the Council had given the gg
this idea.
Committee Member Taczanowsky
warned the Committee that they should be really careful
about amending oaths that are taken because of the personal liability and suggested that there
were reasons why language some of the lan e has changed. Mr. Tazcanowsky stated that he is not
comfortable making this kind of recommendation to the Council.
recommendation with the rationale of the
Committee Member Boswell suggested making a
recommendation and leave it up to the Council to accept it.
Committee Adler stated that he is trying torespond to the comments received from the Open
Houses and trust was repeatedly
mentioned. Mr. Adler informed the Committee that he has
contacted the
Town Attorneywith this idea,but has not received any response yet.
Mr. Sinclair commented that if the problem we have is not part of the General Plan document,
then there is not much the Committee can do. Mr. Sinclair pointed out that even offering
recommendations the Committee really does not
suggestions and/or have a format to do that
could be made
the context of the plan. Mr. Sinclair cited that a note of this suggestion
other than
in the minutes and forward it to the Council, but he did not know of any other avenue.
' strongsentiment about trust received
Mr. Sinclair delcared that the minutes will reflect the
through the course of the Open Houses.
Committee Member Taczanowsky responded that he wanted noted in the minutes that he does
not have an issue about trust with the Town Council.
ITEM IV. REVIEW, DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING
COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM THE JANUARY 27, 2005,JOINT
STUDY SESSION WITH THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
•
MOTION: Committee Member Kuehn MOVED to modify the language in the
seconds
sentence under Revenue Generation on page 37 of the General
Plan to read, "Other revenue streams, such as, but not limited to,
development fees, user fees, and annexations are other methods to pay for
services." Committee Member Adler SECONDED the motion. Motion
carried(9-0).
MOVED to reword policy 3.1.9 to read,
MOTION: Committee Member Chatfield
"The Town shall support annexations that are economically beneficial to
the Town. Any pre-annexation agreement will strive to avoid creating
negative impacts to the safety, view, or integrity of existing
neighborhoods, respecting g
ectin existing entitlements. There will be a provision
for adequate notice for all pre-annexation agreements." Committee
Member TaczanowskySECONDED the motion. Motion carried (9-0).
MOTION: Committee Member Chatfield MOVED to amend the wording in the last
sentence ofolic 4.1.3 to read, "The Town reasonable wishes to be
P y
satisfied that sufficient demand exists before authorizing rezoning to a
higher land use intensity than present zoning permits." and insert it at
policy1.4.3 and renumber the remainder of the policies in that section.
gm
Committee Member Bergman SECONDED the motion. Motion carried
(9-0).
ON GENERAL PLAN
AND POSSIBLE ACTION
ITEM V. CONSIDERATION
ISSUE ITEMS A AND "B" REGARDING FINDINGS" FOR PLAN
AMENDMENTS.
Member Boswell MOVED to amend the language for
MOTION: Committee
Adoption of Amendment and combine finding number 2 language to read,
"The disposition of the General Plan Amendment proposed shall be based
with the vision, goals and policies of the General Plan;
on consistency
and, with se cial emphasis on: number
listing the findings with the renumbering
of number p3 is now 4 is now number 3. Committee
Member Roszak SEGO
number
NDED2 the motion. Motion carried (8-1,
Committee Member Chatfield opposed).
• MOVED to amend� the language for finding
MOTION: Committee Member McKee g
number 3 (which is the new finding#2 from the previous motion) to read,
"The proposed ch
an
an e reflects market demand which leads to viability and
general co i acceptance and,". Committee Member Boswell
mm p
SECONDED the motion. Motion carried (7-2, Committee Members
Chatfield and Adler opp os sed).
ITEM VI. CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING ANY
ADDITIONAL REVISIONS TO THE GENERAL PLAN.
• MOVED to leave the plan the way it is
MOTION: Committee Member Bergman
"shall"with the statements. Committee Member Chatfield SECONDED
the motion. Motion carried'(9-0).
ITEMS VII. CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING ANY
ADDITIONAL REVISIONS TO THE GENERAL PLAN.
Committee Member McKee addressed the Committee about the Economic Development
Statement and thedesirability�o bring g in high tech business or high paying jobs. Mr. McKee
..:
stated that he was
goingto ask the Committee to look at the land use maps and try to improve
them,but he determined that this is
somethin that the Committee would not be able to do at this
meeting.
Mr. Adler stated that the Council charged the Committee with looking at the term"Fair Share,"
it was felt that the Economic Development think tank would.
but the Committee did not becausehould
when recommendations are made through the process, the Committee s
Mr. Adler feels that is on the list of
explain why
no action has been taken on"Fair Share" and brings it up because it
things that the Committee is supposed to address.
• at the joint meetin It had to do with the
nt Sinclair brow ht up one item that was mentionedg
Bre g
idea of when the Committee
took awaythe back-up designations, what is the effect?
• situation with the Steam PumpRanch. The current plan shows a back-
upMr. Sinclair described the
ercial but it is not clear if it is Neighborhood Commercial, Community
designation of Comm ,
Commercial or Regional Comme
rcial. Mr. Sinclair asked Mr. Nodine if the Steering Committee
and Mr. Nodine replied that the property was left with the 1996
made any recommendations,
Plan with the back up designation taken off. The recommendation was that it be Regional
Commercial to the North, adjacent to Steam Pump Village,e, and Nei hbohood Commercial
Office to the South with an mm
overlayarea over the core area of Significantg Resource Area, with
the idea of being able to preserve the historic ranch.
ow.the bulk of it with Sig �ificant
Mr. Nodine stated that the plan today would sh .Resource Area
over the Open Space. Mr. Sinclair stated that it is presently Open Space, one unit per acre. Mr.
that this property has one through a zoning change based on the olddesignation
Sinclair stated p p y g
back upof Commercial. So now if you are eliminating the back up
of Open Space with the
Commercial, all it is going to showOpenSpace,is S ace which we can't do, it reverts to one unit per
acre, a designation that we do not use anymore.
Committee Member Chatfield stated that if there
was some adjustment made that could help the
objective of historicpreservation, he would like to support that.
Town achieve its obi e
wsk MO
MOTION: Committee Member TaczanoMOVED to forward recommendations y
to the Pnng
la and Zonin Commission to take this up at their level to
p
achieve the reservatig on goals o f the Town. Committee Member Kuehn
SECONDED the motion. Motion carried (9-0).
IX. NEX
T STEPS FOR REVISION PROCESS
Planning and Zoning Commission General Plan Hearing Meetings:
April 26, 2005,`6:00 - 8:00 m.
p .
Sun City Recreation Center-Auditorium
May 9, 2005, 6:00 - 8:00 p.m.
Church of the Nazarene
500 W. Calle Concordia
Respectfully submitted,
DRAFT MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
SPECIAL SESSION
APRIL 26, 2005
** TY RECREATION CENTER AUDITORIUM **
SUN CI --
1495 E. Rancho Vistoso Blvd.
SPECIAL SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Chair Don Cox
Vice Chair John Anning
Commissioner Bill Adler
Commissioner Pete Bistany
Commissioner Don Manross
Commissioner Doug McKee
Also Present: K.C. Carter, Council Member
Conny Culver, Council Member
Helen Dankwerth, Council Member
Paula Abbott, Council Member
Brent Sinclair, Community Development Director
Robert Delaney, G.P. Update Revision Committee Member
Bob K ,
ovitz Governmental & Community Relations Administrator
Bryant Nodine, AICP, Planning & Zoning Administrator
Chair Cox announced Ken Kinared'sresignation resi nation from the Commission and thanked him for
his efforts. Chair Cox welcomed Bill Adler as a new member of the Commission.
1. PUBLIC
HEARING, OV11-01-04, GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
presentation Nodine gave a on the General Plan. (Copy attached.)
The General Plan guides development and the regulation of development and is an
planning and zoningactions within the Town. The General Plan has
umbrella for all of the plan g
policies that tell us that we need to change the Zoning Code to meet the General Plan. At
a finer level, the General Plan
affects plats, architecture, signage, landscaping, etc. With
every project received by the
Town, Staff checks to see if the project meets the Code. The
project is also reviewed to
see if it conforms to the policies within the General Plan and at
that point negotiations with the applicant are undertaken to try to get the project to
conform.
Mr. Nodine gave the StaffReportpointing ointin out the revised General Plan and Strategic
Implementation Plan pages with changes marked in blue. (See April 26, 2005 Staff
Report) Changes to the plan that were addressed were:
p )
April 26, 2005
AGENDA, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 2
. There is no
• How plan amendments get done longer a differentiation in terms of
amendments between growth areas and the rest of the areas of the Town.
• The 4 findings• gs for amendments were addressed to make sure they met the goals
and policies of the plan.
• Wording, "The Town shall" was used to tighten up the goals and policies.
• Mixed use developmentproperty
andtax references were removed.
Land Use Map changes were
• Remove one growth area that was premature at this point.
g
• Redefine what
a Significant Resource Area is, in terms of how key open space
areas need to be protected.
• Remove back up designations
The
Steampump Ranch area is still unresolved. Update Revision Committee did not want
to look at an individual parcel on the Land Use Map, but recommended to the Commission
and the Council that they look at this area and come up with a designation that meets the
Town. Staff recommends the historic area be designated as open
best interests of the Tow
d the historic area be designated as Community and Regional
space and the areas around
Commercial, with a Significant Resource Area over the top of all for a lowerintensity.
Commissioner Adler said regarding ardin the Introduction, there are paragraphs and sections
within that portion of t plan lan that need to be updated. For example, the description on
Preparation and Adoption stops with the
page 7 entitled Document 2003 Plan going to the p
brought current. There are areas in that section that refer to
voters. This should be g
special properties, for example, property
theimmediately north of the Naranja Town Site is
the Town, so that paragraph is obsolete. He can send Mr.
no longer being pursued by
Nodine a detailedseparately list se aratel with corrections so it reads more current.
Commissioner Adler also asked what influence could or should the Town have with regard
to any ultimate development of the State Land immediately to the north. What leverage
does the Town have in terms
of how that land might ultimately be developed and is there
anything further that should be considered.
Yt g
Adler that a new introduction is being worked on which will
Mr. Sinclair told Commissioner
date from thepastplan to the present, including anything that needs
bring everything up to to be modified or changed.
That will include new commission and council members and
anyone that has had a part in the revision process.
Mr. Nodine explained that there are two scenarios regarding the State Land: (1) the State
Land stays within the County.. The General Plan would become what we send to the
County in terms of our recom
mendations for development of that land. (2) The State Land
annexed into the Town oy
f Oro Valley. Then the General Plan would become the policy
guides for any rezoning property
of thatwithin the Town. This is an opportunity to
influence rezoning and how that area is developed.
Adler said the Land Use Map shows an area of Master Planned
Commissioner
Community.
How would we use that to influence the County for rezoning?
April 26, 2005
AGENDA, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 3
area is Master Planned Community, only the area in
Mr. Nodine replied (1) not all of the
area is either low density or very low density. All is
the far north east. The bulk of the proposed to have a Significant
Resource Area designation over the top so anything
the densityrange. It would have very large lots
comingin should be at the lower end of g
(2) In terms of the Master Planned
develo ment to preserve open space.
with clusteredp rezoningbyexaminingthe
density ranges will be determined at the time of
Community, the de y g plan's development development impact analysis.
Commissioner Bistany said the State Land was not a part of the current bond issue. The
east to Oracle was excluded from the bond issue. This
land north from Desert Glen and
The State mandates it can't be zoned so restrictively that it
land could be up for purchase. •
Council should start pursuing annexation of that land or the
can't be marketed. The Town
Town may be subservient to Pima County for what goes on there.
well aware of that and have been working with the State
Mr. Nodine stated that we are
corridor and buffer to the north of Sun City are
Land. The wildlife not dead issues in spite of the State pulling back frompreserve their initiative and the bond money not being
there.
The State Land people were very open o to creatinga corridor at the south end of the State
Land adjacent to Sun City.
Mr. Nodine told Commissioner McKee that it is possible for the Town of Oro Valley to
State is willing land at any point the to do so. He thinks the General Plan helps
towards the State agreeing
to do that. The General Plan is not everything the State
t is basicallythe highest and best value for the schools.
wanted. Their mandate g
paragraph
Commissioner Bistany said on 3.1.9, page 38, regarding annexations that are
economically beneficial
to the Town, it could be misleading because of the emphasis on
annexed into the Town, how do you treat views on residential
views. When land is
property that is directly adjacent adjacent to already designated commercial property that is not
developed?
pre-annexation Nodine said it is related to agreements, which the Committee felt
controls. When a property is annexed from the County, it has zoning
should have tighter p p
and existing entitlements. It
has to be translated to something similar in the Town. The
wording should handle those issues.
Commissioner Adler pointed out that the Land Use Map provided shows a growth area at
La Cholla and Tangerine that was removed.
Chair Cox said on page 37, lastparagraph
regarding Revenue Generation, in the General
income for the
"Sales tax revenues are not the only source of
Plan that failed it read,
Town. Development fees, use fees, property ert ro taxes, and annexations are other methods to
Y
pay for services." When the plan lan went to the voters there was a strong movement that
said property tax
and MUN's were an issue. People he talked to also said it was an issue.
The new paragraph as shown in the handout has the words property taxes removed. He
proposes that a positive statement be made that says the Town shall not consider property
taxes as a source of revenue.
April 26, 2005
AGENDA, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 4
responded that he would oppose a statement Adler like that becausewe desire,
a community looking ahead, in order to have of excellence and the services that
it coulda
be that property tax and other taxes may be necessary.
PUBLIC HEARING opened at 6:55 p.m.
Chris Duncan, 14640 N. Desert
Rock Drive, said the State Land in question goes from
Desert Rock, south to about where northern Lobelia and
Desert Glen east to the
Chrysanthemum meet and
then it becomes Oro Valley land. When you were here in
last forum on open land, he remembers that the State Land adjoining Sun City, north and
Back updesignation
east would be designated open space. was to be Master Planned g
Community, 1 dwelling per acre pursuant to State Law. The rational for Master Planned
spurious developers from "cherry picking" the land. There was
Community was to preventp p
put together to sketch out what the Master Planned Community
going to be a study group g
was going to look like in theory Apparently A arentl there was some bureaucratic drag at 11000
La
was disposed of. We have State Land to the east and north
Canada and that commitment p
of us and our neighbors at Honeybee Canyon and Estates and Stone Mountain have the
y
same problem as Sun City.
The issue needs to be addressed in the Town plan, clearly,
eloquently and without doubt of what we mean. We want protection and that was the
thrust severalY ears ago. Now, what are the plans?
John Antliff, 13540 Pima Spring,S rin wanted to know why there were no handouts of the
General Plan.
Bill McCarthy, 2216 E. Sausalito Trail, had the following questions:
1. Where is Steampump Ranch?
Implementation Plan, which is for the next 20 years with
2. Regarding the Strategicp
objectives, short, medium and long term, who will monitor the plan?
goals and
land to the north of Sun City, can Catalina also annex the property?
3. Regarding the ?
their best interest to purchase the land for what they want? If
If they can, is it in
they
did, does that mean we don't have the option to annex?
if there are specific guidelines the State has to sell this property
4. On that annexation, p
with the intent the purchaser has for residential housing, if Oro Valley annexed, isn't
Town still obligated to give the same general land use?
the g �
5. How can
the General Plan, which is a 20 year plan, exclude property taxes.
Planner with AZ State Land Department. The State Land Department
Catherine Balzano,
is opening an office in Tucson and she was transferred to Tucson from Phoenix. For the
public and communitiesdealing
that are with State trust issues, this is a monumental
workingrelationships. Southern Arizona has not been the focal
improvement in potential p
p
point
for the State Land Department because of the huge development pressures in
Maricopa County. happening With what is ha enin in Pima County, it is very important that we
have a stronger presence. The main reason she came to this meeting is that she knows
how important what happens on the State Trust Land is to this community. The same
statute that directs towns, counties, and cities to prepare general plans and
plans also directs the State Land Department to do conceptual planning on
comprehensive
the Urban Trust Land. By statute Urban Trust Land is land within one mile of communities
April 26, 2005
AGENDA, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 5
250,000 in population or less and within 3 miles of communities a quarter million or more.
with some Urban Lands. It can also be land that the
I n theparticular case we are dealing •
planning. explained that the Trust
Commissioner designates as being suitable for p g p
We do conceptual
of Oro Valleyis not on the radar screen for disposition. p
Land north in Tucson and some
year disposition plan and are focused on infill parcels
planning, a five p • • prepared for
Marana and Saharita as some of the higher priorities being p p
properties in County, Pima
• • Arizona office is goingto be working with Cochise C y,
disposition. The Southern
County, Santa Cruz County and
Southern Pinal County. The Land Department has not
the State
the General Plan Update yet. The purpose of
prepared written comments on
Trust Land is to provide orderly development ment of lands near growing communities. Is there
a beautiful marriage at some point in the future of what the community wants and what the
State sees as appropriate and suitable on that State Trust Land? She believes the answer
is yes. By statute the plans that we do with our land, we are required to integrate into the
t typically withgeneral plan amendment and through a
community plans. That is doneyp y a .
• of opportunities for the State to work with the Town and first
public process. There are lots pp
and foremost is they are here
to work with Oro Valley. They do have a fiduciary mandate
tog enerate revenue from the Trust Land.
Carl Kuehn, 9250 N. Calle Loma
Linda, was involved in the General Plan's defeat and the
General Plan Update Revision
Committee. As the time line proceeds through its required
steps according to StateLaw and goes into the hands of Planning and Zoning, he
encouraged consideration of what the citizen's Steering Committee and the Revision
accommodate the changes as directed by Town Council. At this
Committee tried to do to ,
nes probablyaren't worth making, because last time the plan's
point in time, little changes . . ,
result of how much theplan changed after it left the citizens Steering
defeat was largely a placed and before itgot of before the citizens to vote. The tax issue keeps being
paid for a statisticallyvalid survey to find out the perimeters of why
mentioned. The Town o issues plan was
defeated. The tax issue came in at about 3 or 4%. Other issues were
' government. The plan was defeated by a 5 to 3 margin, so in a
mistrust of the Town's
statistically valid sampling, thever
tax issue is not important. He respectfully suggested
Y
' is not statisticallyvalid. We don't know what our needs will
that Chairman Cox's sampling
be in the 10 year plan and does not think it is wise to cut off any potential revenue. It is the
political process that determines whether or not a property tax would ever be a reality in
Oro Valley.
Chet Oldakowski, 11706
N. Via De La Verbenita, was involved in two major interests that
and government. One is a group that is opposed to the financial
involve Oro Valley developments granted
to lettingdevelo ments in Town. He is also a member of Council
' economic development think tank. The group is made up of a
Member Helen Dankwerth s p
broad cross-section of people within the Town, i.e. bankers, real estate, developers,
p
industry and ordinary citizens. We have studied trying to look at ways we can develop
economic security for the Town. We have looked at incentives, health programs,
services, etc. We have asked for and will be receiving from the Finance
development
Director an outlook of
what the Town needs to survive over the next five to ten years. That
is key because you can't have economic security if you don't know what you need down
seen some preliminaryinformation that shows where the Town has
the road. We have
received tax revenues and what is the outlook for the future tax revenues. If you look at
the "wants" versus the needs of the Town, we may have some difficulty in meeting all of
April 26, 2005
AGENDA, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 6
comingout of this task
wants. There may be some recommendations force that will
to apply stopgapmeasures to help bridge that gap in revenues.
then go to Council pp y is a
we looked at. There
Property taxes are one of the itemsis a property tax and there.
isalmost like a bond issue. You take out a tax and
secondary tax. The secondary tax
allocate it for a specific application.. You have to think about how to run the Town like a
hands of the Towngovernment if a statement was put in
business. It would be tying the saying no property taxes. Keep in mind the Council cannot put a tax in place. They can
recommend a tax. The voters make the decision.
Oldakowski that our current 1996 plan says that growth
Commissioner Adler told Mr. .
plan indicates thatgrowth should pay its fair share. Do
should pay for itself. The proposed you have any recommendation as to how those statements should be qualified or
supported?
Mr. Oldakowski did not have a response.
PUBLIC HEARING closed at 7:20 p.m.
the question of no handouts to the General Plan that there are
Chair Cox responded to available at Town Hallfor $20 coies or it is available on-line or on CD for $8.00. There is
copies
also a copy available at the Library.
regarding comments for State Land, that Catherine Balzano
Mr. Nodine responded g g
it is not on their radar at this point. They need to be involved
answered it well. As she said i
when it is ripe for development. When it gets closer there will be
in the planning process p p
them andplansput together for it. There is no sense in the Town
communication with g
plan for an area until we have the State plan engaged in that process.
doing a detailed p
a . The
about creating There has been discussion an open space area adjacent to Sun City.
current General Plan designatesopen
it as space. When the State law changed, it said
p
is designated as open space, it ends up becoming one unit per acre
that if an area g p
because you cannot totallyaway
take developability of the area. The plan is to designate
lots with an overlayon top that says this is an important area to
that area as 3 acre
preserve. Ideally it should be lower than 3 acre lots and/or clustered away from Sun City
to create a corridor between the Tortolitas and the Catalinas.
pointed Nodine out where Steampump Ranch is located.
Strategic Implementation monitoring:n Plan monitorin : there is a program within the Administration
lar basis to the Town Council on the implementation of the plan.
section to report on a regular presentation 2-3 years an
involved is given to the public. The General Plan calls for
the Town and Council to monitor the implementation.
Can Catalina annex? With the State law requiring a new jurisdiction to be 6 miles away
from an incorporated jurisdiction, Catalina cannot annex.
If Oro Valley gets the
land from the State, the zoning would be the current zoning on the
property and translated into the Town at the lowest density.
p Y
April 26, 2005
AGENDA, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 7
How can the General Plan exclude property
taxes? The General Plan doesn't establish
becomes the voters who
taxes, it onlyultimately
property established the policy. It
approve or don't approve taxes.
• regardingproperty taxes that he has been sitting in on
Commissioner McKee commented p p Y •
• strategicplan of annexation was not discussed.
the economic development meetings. The s g much commercial area as possible is done and done
If the annexation plan to bring in as
•
itfinancialproblems for the community for a long time.
will alleviate most of the .
quickly, developed and the 5-10 year projection is complete.
That won't be known until the plan is
Chair Cox thanked those who provided comments.
The next public hearingMay
will be 9, 2005 at the Church of the Nazarene.
ADJOURN SPECIAL SESSION
Viceto adjourn the April 26th Special Session of the
MOTION: Chair Anning movedp Planning and Zoning Commission. Commissioner Bistany seconded the motion.
Motion carriedyes,6 0 no. Meeting adjourned at 7:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Diane Chapman, Recording Secretary
DRAFT MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
SPECIAL SESSION
MAY 9, 2005
CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE
500 W. CALLE CONCORDIA
SPECIAL SESSION AT 6:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Chair Don Cox
Vice Chair John Anning
Commissioner Bill Adler
Commissioner Pete Bistany
Commissioner Teree Bergman
Commissioner Don Manross
Commissioner Doug McKee
Others Present: Mayor Paul Loomis
K.C. Carter, Council Member
Barry Gillaspie, Council Member
Robert Delaney, General Plan Update Revision Committee Member
Bryant
Nodine, AICP, Planning and Zoning Administrator
Chair Cox welcomed new Commissioner Teree Bergman.
1. PUBLIC
HEARING, OV11-01-04, GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
Mr. Nodine gave a presentation on the General Plan revisions. (See attached copy)
Commissioner Adler asked that a couple of items be addressed at this point so the public will
understand and perhaps comment on.
• There is a statement in the Generalguide Plan to the Town to annex the land north of
tate Land De artment's participation, we need a definitive or
Sun City. With the S p
conceptual plan for that land.
• We have a zoning code that requires residential subdivisions to set aside recreational
in in our General Plan that provides guidance as to how that
space. There is noth g
code should be revised or interpreted.
• There is a policy
that talks about monitoring areas to be safe guarded with
conservation easements, etc.
• A Land use district to be considered for Steampump Ranch.
PUBLIC HEARING opened at 6:20 p.m.
Robert Evans, 473 E. Heatherglenn, came here because of the recreation element aspect.
g
May 9, 2005 Action Summary PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 2
Recreation Advisory a member of the Parks and Board, he would like to know what will be
changed from the old Focus 2020 Recreational Element regarding park dedication.
Mr. Nodine said the policies
that are in the General Plan have not changed since he met with
PRAB. Any changes tonight would be the first changes to those policies.
PUBLIC HEARING closed at 6:25 p.m.
Chair Cox questioned
whyCommissioner Adler brought up the items at this time and were
not part of the Revisions Committee's revisions discussed at that time and/or acted upon.
Commissioner Adler said the Revision Committee reacted to the charge put to them by the
Town Council. They specific s ecific items that were identified as creating difficulties
Plan election process. The Revision Committee did not consider the
during the General
items he brought forward. He is trying to make sure that the Plan is as comprehensive as it
needs to be to provideguidance uidance and direction for the future. The item of State Land and its
ultimate use came up at the first public hearing and he felt it was appropriate to make
suggestions.
Bergman had some concern about whether the policy is needed because
Commissioner
these issues
were alreadycovered in the plan. One of the major problems the public had
with the last Plan, as revealed in the surveys, is that the Planning Commission and the Town
Y
Council made significant nificant changes to the Plan after it left the General Plan Review Committee.
concerned about a similar process being followed this time. She would not want to
She was
make
anychanges here unless there was a very compelling reason to do so.
Vice Chair agreed.Anninga reed. He was also concerned about the process. If these issues were
not part of the directivegivenby
the Council to the Update Committee, he did not think they
were that important. There are other ways to deal with these issues one at a time after the
Plan has been approved.
Commissioner By
istan said he did not see anything wrong with this. The annexation was put
on the back burner because of the bond issue. The land area was not included in the Pima
County bond issue. People were depending on Pima County's representation that there was
going to be aneg
ecological corridor. Sun City did not look on the annexation favorably. He
in somethingto get control of this land. He supports a visible effort on the part
advocates doing
of the Town to pursue annexation of this land.
g
Commissioner
McKee agreed with Commissioner Bergman. The State Land is already in our
planning area and therefore is a candidate for annexation. If you put priorities on annexation
areas, then you are going oin to have to look at all areas outside the boundaries, but inside the
planning
area and do the same thingfor them. This is not needed. We would be corrupting
the process making a change at this point.
Chair Cox did
not know it this is the most appropriate place to bring this forward. The Council
did give
the Revision Committee a list of things to look at. That list came primarily from the
pp
people who opposed the General Plan. He did not have a problem with this group making
changes. Itinappropriate isnot ins ro riate for the Commission to make recommendations to the Town
May 9, 2005 Action Summary PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 3
Council, nor for the Council to make changes.
Commissioner Adler emphasized that none of the items he brought forward represented
changes. He introducedlanguage lan a that does not exist to add clarity. In the case of the State
g
Land, he was trying to indicate what the Town's interest should be in that land. The size of
that land and its immediateproximity roximit to an important and largely populated district mandates
something be
in the General Plan indicating what level of interest the Town will take.
MOTION: Commissioner Adler MOVED to add the following language to the General
Plan: "The Towns hall pursue annexation of the state land north and east of Sun City,
p
and work
with the State Land Department to create and adopt a conceptual
development planas suggested for the area.", in the Economic Development Element
provision#3.1.3,
with the that it is also added to the work plan and to the Strategic
Implementation Plan and be indicated as a short term item. Commissioner Bistany
seconded the motion. Motion carried 7 yes, 0 no.
Commissioner Adler said in Chapter 4 of the Zoning Code it specifies that minimal
p
recreational areas require a formula of 1 acre per 85 dwelling units. That is on the work plan
for revision.
He felt the General Plan needs to provide some guidance as to how that code
should be revised.
MOTION: Commissioner Adler MOVED that the following wording should be added to
the Parks
and Recreational Element of the General Plan as #d8.3.7: The Town shall
continue to require dedication of recreational space within new residential sub
� appropriate q
of a size adequate, and a propriate location, based upon demography and
corresponding
needs of the future residents. The average lot size and distance from a
Town
Park will also be a factor in the size of the recreation area. Motion DIED from
lack of a second.
Commsexisting
Commissioner Adler said the policy #11.5.10 indicates that the Town is to monitor
any degradation observed on land that is designated to be protected or preserved. This
needs to be
clarified with havingan annual report reflecting any abuse on the property and
have action taken submitted to the proper bodies.
MOTION: Commissioner Adler MOVED that the following language be added to Policy
#11.5.10p
An annual report on area monitoring reflecting any degradation observed
and action taken to be submitted to the Planning Commission and Town Council in the
fiscalquarter of each year and added to the Planning and Zoning Work Plan and
last
the Strategic Implementation Plan, short term. Motion DIED from lack of a second.
g p
Adler said in policy9.1.6 it says the Town shall encourage the development of
Commissioner
designated art districts. This does not exist in the Town Code. Whatever designation is
applied should be complimentary to an historic area such as Steampump Ranch.
pp
MOTION: Commissioner Adler MOVED that the Planning and Zoning Commission
recommend to Town Council that an ordinance be initiated and adopted creating an
Arts District land use designation, and that this designation be placed over the
Steampump Ranchproperty. Commissioner Bistany seconded the motion for
p p
May 9,
2005 Action Summary PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 4
purposes of discussion.
Discussion: Commissioner
Bistanyasked if this was substantially different from what we
have now.
Mr. Nodine said we
are workingwith the County to preserve the historic core of the area
through the bond program
that the Countyhas. That area would be a Historic Park and
development that would go with that historic site. The rest of the area around the Historic
Core, different t t es of commercial uses were considered when the applicant was pursuing a
Staff is still proposing commercial uses in the area, with a designation
rezoning for the area. p p g
of Community and Regional Commercial. Regional Commercial is the most intense form.
Community Commercial is a lower intensity. The whole area is overlaid with the Significant
Resource designation. might
Even though it mi be developed and the General Plan would
recommend as a policy
that it come in as commercial, matching the areas to the north and
south, it should be
at a low intensityand respect the fact that there is an historic site there.
That is what the Significant Resource Area designation does. That is the reason for the open
space and commercial designations proposed in that area.
Commissioner Adler
said none of our existingdesignations allow uses that are low intensity.
Uses, as described in that attachment to the handout given to the Commissioners, are
y
unmistakable low
intensity. We want to be sure we are applying a land use that describes
p
the uses that are intensity,impact, low intensit , low profile, and exactly the uses that would be
preservation tothis area. An arts district can be created in such a way that it
overlays the entire property.
p
Mr. Nodine said
the Update Revision Committee did look at this item and did not take action.
The Committee specifically said to forward recommendation to the Planning and Zoning
p y
Commission
to take it upat their level to achieve the preservation goals of the Town.
Commissioner Bergman said the idea of an arts district has merit. We don't know whether
this would be a perfect fit because we don't have any district in place and we don't know what
it might encompass. It would make more sense to adopt what Staff has recommended now,
and once the arts district is created, then look at whether a Plan amendment would be
appropriate ro riate to change the designation on this property.
Commissioner Bistany agreed reed and would like more time to study this.
Commissioner Manross pointed out that when we are talking about arts districts, there are
State taxes involved. This should be discussed later.
g
Commissioner
Adler said it is on the agenda to act with regard to Steampump Ranch. There
is not a commercial designation that would allow the flexibility and adaptation that we
visualize for this historic core.
Commissioner McKee asked if there was a timing issue on this. It would need to be in the
General Plan
to be effective. Otherwise the Commission or Council would have to initiate a
Plan amendment to put that designation on this parcel. What would this do to
General
negotiations?
tion Summa PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 5
May 9, 2005 Ac rY
said the negotiations, but thinks it is to the point of
Mr. Nodine he has not been involved in g
establishment of value. The art designation mayaffect the value of the property, because the
owner of the property would indicate that there were severance issues. Because they
couldn'tg et the value out of the property
for commercial, they would want to get more value
for the other portion.
Chair Cox said we do not know if it would increase or decrease the value at this time.
MOTION FAILED,
1 yes, 6 no. Commissioner Adler voted yes.
Mr. Nodine gave
the Staff recommendation for Steampump Ranch.
McKee that the most important thing is that the designations
Mr. Nodine told Commissioner Y
match and work with the
historic core. The types of uses should be destination type uses.
should match that area. In terms of blending to the
The scale of the uses and architecture
north and south, the south is essentiallyalready
developed. The north is starting to pick up
the architecture has been approved. The most important
the elements of the Ranch and
thing is that the area creates a transition from the historic area to the other areas and doesn't
interfere with the use of the site as an historic site.
Special wording was used for t property
he Kaias well as Kelly Ranch, La Cholla/Tangerine,
and Rooney Ranch North.
Those are beingdeveloped on the fly, but some general direction
could be given to Staff if the Commission would like to develop those further for
recommendation to the Council.
Commissioner Adler said there
was nothingin the Home Depot Center that is of a scale
be visualized for this property. As far as Steampump Village
commensurate with what might
is concerned, it is supposed to include a hotel and other large scale retail uses. Making
p
of those properties is not the right approach and he would
reference to blending with either p
not be able to support that. Thoseproperties erties are not designed to blend with an historical
p
property.
our goals Cox asked if adding language
to clarifywhat is, such as "small scale bed and
breakfast", etc., would be helpful.
provide direction, but you don't want to be too specific in adding
Mr. Nodine said they would
language for the types of uses onlyto what types of things you are trying to achieve, i.e.
Yp
scale.
concerned about going too far in directing the private sector as to
Vice Chair Anning was
without having they can place on a parcel economic impact. If the land could not be
marketed for those uses, then nothingis being accomplished. He would like to know more
about desirable uses and how the market place would react to those uses.
Chair Cox said he has faith that the Council and Commission will do what the public wants in
this place.
May 9, 2005 Action Summary PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 6
MOTION: Vice Chair Anning in MOVED to accept Staff's recommendation for Steampump
Ranch, that the approximately 5 acre core area, be designated as Open Space (OS) and
as Community/Regional remainder be designated Commercial (CRC) with a
• Resource Area (SRA) desi nation over the top of most of the area.
Si nificant designation i
Commissioner Manross seconded the motion. Motion carried 6 yes, 1 no,
Commissioner Adler voting no.
e confusion in the Neighborhood Commercial designation in
Mr. Nodine said there was some g
the zoning category and
Neighborhood Commercial as a designation in the General Plan.
He
has some concerns about trying to change the names and recommends no change.
that because
MOTION: Vice Chair Anning MOVEDNeighborhood Commercial (C-N),
Residential Services District (R-S) and C-1 Commercial District are all appropriate
districts within the Neighborhood Commercial/Office (NCO) designation, that there be
no change in the language. Commissioner Manross seconded the motion. Motion
carried 7 yes, 0 no.
MOTION:
Commissioner Manross MOVED to forward the corrections/revisions to
make the Plan more current, (green edits in the packet) to the Mayor and Council. Vice
Chair Anningseconded the motion. Motion carried 7 yes, 0 no.
about the property tax issue. The General Plan that was defeated
Chair Cox was concernedp p Y
revenues are not the only that sales tax source of income for the Town. Development
fees, user fees, property
taxes and annexations are other methods to pay for services. There
was a large public display dis la of vote no on the plan, no MUNs and no property taxes. The
' decided the plan should say, "Sales tax revenues are not the only
Revision Committee
income for the Town. Other revenue streams such as, but not limited to,
source of
development fees, user fees, and annexations are other methods to pay for services." The
words property tax
were removed from the General Plan, however, they were replaced by
s such as, but not limited to". He would like to have the General Plan
"other revenue streams,
make a positive statement t ment that as a matter of policy the Town should not consider a property
tax as a source of revenue.
MOTION:
Commissioner McKee MOVED that a positive statement should be made in
the General Plan that as a matter of policy, that the Town should not consider a
property tax as a
source of revenue. Commissioner Manross seconded the motion.
Discussion: Commissioner Bergman said the General Plan Update Revision Committee
discussed this and she is not in favor of making the change at this time. The Council has the
prerogative to consider means of revenue it thinks are appropriate. A property tax
pp
requires a public
referendum. It is inappropriate to state in the Plan that this is a particular
means we are not going to have.
Chair Crying said hetry g in to react to the voters who voted against the plan.
May 9, 2005
Action Summary PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 7
Commissioner Bistany agreed with Commissioner Bergman. Property tax has to go to a
tion does not make sense if it still has to be acted
vote. Excluding something from considers
upon by a vote.
Motion failed, 3 yes, 4 no. Voting yes: Commissioners Manross, Cox and McKee.
Voting no: Commissioners Adler, Bistany, Anning and Bergman.
p
Commissioner Adler point out a couple of corrections needed in the proposed plan:
• Correction of typographical error: Page26,
under Growth Areas, the Town has
identified 5 growth rowth areas, needs to be changed to 4 growth areas.
• Page 10, third paragraph starting in with "Amendments to the General Plan should
the comma it says "findings of facts see below". The
never be allowed..." after Y
wording needs to be changed to make it a single finding of fact.
Adler MOVED that the Planning and Zoning Commission
MOTION: Commissioner
recommend to the Town Council adoption of the General Plan with the actions taken
venin in the above motions, including correction of the
by the Commission this evening
typographical error
and the wordingfor finding of fact. Commissioner Bergman
seconded the motion. Motion carried 7 yes, 0 no.
MOTION: Commissioner Manross MOVED to forward OV11-01-04 the Revised
Strategic Implementation
Plan dated 1/13/2005 to the Town Council recommending
withrecommended bythe Update Revision Committee, adding
approval the changes
the State Land policy as a
task item in the Strategic Implementation Plan. Vice Chair
Anningseconded the motion. Motion carried 7 yes, 0 no.
ADJOURN SPECIAL SESSION
Manross MOVED to adjourn the May 9, 2005 Planning and
MOTION: Commissioner adjourn
Zoning Special Session. ViceAnning
Chair seconded the motion. Motion carried 7
yes, 0 no. Meeting adjourned at 7:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Diane Chapman, Recording Secretary
ENT OF r
�P�s�
•
4;r P. , United States Department of the Interior SERVICE
U.S. Fish and Wildlife.Service
\.
Iii .►1,
w1 • .t. 115
Arizona Ecological Services Field Office
<111—
' Suite 103 -'-"
2321 West Royal Palm Road,
c" 3' Phoenix, Arizona 85021-4951
Telephone: (602) 242-0210 Fax: (602)242-2513
In Reply Refer to:
AESO/SE
`i.CC A
02-21-05-T-0423 'yF ,
May 10, 2005
Mr. Bryant Nodine
Planning and Zoning Administrator
Town of. Oro Valley
11000 North La Canada Drive
Oro Valley, Arizona 85737
Dear Mr. Nodine:
We appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on the Town of Oro Valley's (Town)
General Plan update, Focus 2020. We have reviewed the document and have the following
comments and suggestions.
As was correctly pointed out in several places within the document, the Town does include
important and sensitive habitats for a variety of wildlife species, including a number of
endangered,threatened, or special status species. These species include birds, mammals, fish,
and amphibians. Some of these species are year-round residents such as the cactus ferruginous
pygmy-owl (pygmy-owl), and some may be here seasonally such as the yellow-billed cuckoo and
lesser long-nosed bat. Regardless of the type of species or how long it may occur within the
Town, it is extremely important to balance the habitat and resource needs of these and all wildlife
species, with the ever-increasing demand for urban growth and development. A planning process
such as this provides such an opportunity. As indicated in the plate the Town's human
population has more than quadrupled between 1990 and 2000, and it currently exceeds 30,000.
The Town's General Plan will play an integral part in balancing open space and resource
conservation with the need to maintain the social and economic viability of the Town. It is
important to understand that this is not just a wildlife issue, but that the conservation and
enhancement of resources like riparian areas and Sonoran Desert vegetation communities is
closely tied to human quality of life regarding such issues as water quantity and quality, and clean
air.
Land Use
• We support the Town's vision of development that is sensitive to and compatible with the
Sonoran desert environment.
Mr. Bryant Nodine 2
• We support the use of buffer areas to transition from high density/high intensity land uses
to p open space/conservation lands. As contained in Policy 1.4.2, appropriate buffering and
p
land uses adjacent to conserved natural open space, particularly large areas such as
Catalina State Park, will help to soften the impacts of urbanization.
• We commend the Town for its development of a native plant protection ordinance and
landscaping standards. We support Policy 1.4.6 which provides for additional
� g p
landscaping, open space, and other amenities within high-density development.
• It is extremely important that Policy 1.1.3 be vigorously applied. Riparian areas, washes,
and other sensitive vegetation communities are limited and should be conserved. Any
impacts to these types of communities should be avoided. If that is not possible,
minimizing impacts and mitigating for the resultant loss or modification of such
vegetation communities is extremely important. Exceptions to this policy should be
thoroughly considered given the potential permanent effects to the ecosystem.
• Policy 1.1.1 promotes the clustering of development. We support the use of cluster
development to preserve larger,more intact areas of natural open space. However,
different wildlife species react differently to clustered open space versus dispersed open
space within large lot development. For example, impacts to mule deer are likely reduced
through the use of clustered development and larger, more contiguous open space.
However,these high-density clustered areas may result in barriers to reptile and small
mammal species, which are able to persist in the dispersed open space of large lot
development. However, for some species, we do not yet have a clear understanding
which type of development is best. For example, it is currently unclear which approach is
most beneficial to pygmy-owls. We urge the Town to apply this policy with care and
consideration of the local resources. We encourage the Town to pursue grants and other
funding sources to implement a monitoring program that will help to define more clearly
the effects of different development types on the local flora, fauna, hydrology, and other
ecosystem elements.
• The General Plan indicates that many areas within the Town are already hard-zoned for
specific land uses. Table 2 shows the acreages within each development type. It would
be helpful to show how much of these acreages will actually be affected by this general
plan. In other words, of the acreage indicated for each development type, how much is
actually hard-zoned and how much is currently some other zoning designation that could
be affected by this general plan designation.
• We support the removal of the La Cholla/Tangerine Road area as a designated growth
area. This area is of particular importance to the pygmy-owl. The area west of La Cholla
Boulevard has been proposed as critical habitat for the pygmy-owl and also falls within a
recovery area for the pygmy-owl as designated in the draft recovery plan. With the
Mr. Bryant Nodine 3
ongoing widening of Tangerine Road, it is important that land uses adjacent to this
roadway maintain habitat connectivity for the pygmy-owl. For the area west of La
Cholla, the Tangerine Road corridor, and along the major washes and drainages, we
recommend land uses such as Rural Low Density, Low Density Residential, Parks, and
Open Space.
• In areas established for conservation or natural open space, we suggest that adjacent land
uses be compatible with the conservation use so that the function of those conservation
and open space lands is not affected. For example, the development of high-density
housing on the borders of Big Wash, the Canada del Oro Wash, or Tortolita Mountain
Park would reduce, if not eliminate, much of the conservation function of these lands.
This follows the same reasoning as our suggestion to buffer areas so that the transition
between incompatible land uses maintains the conservation function of those lands.
• We encourage the Town to participate in the ongoing habitat conservation planning
processes of Marana and Pima County. This will facilitate consistent planning over a
larger, more effective area. As an alternative, the Town may want to consider developing
their own Habitat Conservation Plan to address the elements of the General Plan and their
potential effects on listed and sensitive species. We are willing to provide the Town with
whatever assistance you may need to evaluate the usefulness of a Habitat Conservation
Plan.
Community Design
• We support your goal of preserving the existing natural Sonoran Desert to the greatest
extent possible for existing and future generations. We urge your continued consideration
of the impacts of grading large areas, the introduction of exotic species, and the overall
destruction of wildlife habitats
Economic Development
• We urge the Town to consider the potential economic contribution of wildlife resources
and open space. Many communities in Arizona have recognized and benefited from the
promotion of ecotourism. Additionally, a well constructed system of natural open space
contributes to the increased property and aesthetic values of areas within the Town.
Transportation/Circulation
• We support Policy 5.4 and recommend that the Town become familiar with Pima
County's Environmentally Sensitive Roadway Design policy. We urge the Town to
consider adopting something similar for roadway construction in important habitat and
open space areas. Roadways contribute significantly to the ongoing fragmentation of
wildlife habitat. Habitat fragmentation has a significant impact on wildlife. Specifically,
Mr. Bryant Nodine 4
roadways may be an impediment to pygmy-owl and other species' movements and
dispersal. Guidelines to minimize road widths, incorporate vegetated medians, and
improve culvert and bridge crossings will reduce the impacts of roadways on pygmy-owls
and other wildlife.
• We strongly support Policy 5.6 and the Town's efforts to reduce automobile traffic and
promote more environmentally sensitive transportation methods.
Public Facilities, Services, and Safety
• We encourage the Town to implement Policy 6.2 because joint land-use planning and
shared facilities should reduce the overall footprint of development with the Town.
Parks and Recreation
• Policy 8.1 is very important to maintaining an overall system of interconnected open
space within the Town. Integrating parks and other recreational areas into the open space
system can provide enhanced benefits to the Town. It is important that the Town promote
passive recreation as a viable alternative within open space areas. It is also important that
incompatible uses be avoided within open space areas. For example, promoting an active
recreational site within an important riparian area will reduce or eliminate wildlife habitat
values. However, passive recreational activities such as walking or bird watching may be
compatible. Effective integration of parks with open space protected to conserve habitat
connectivity can be accomplished and will be beneficial to the Town.
• We encourage the Town to consider the multiple benefits of conservation lands.
Conservation and recreation need not be mutually exclusive if planned and implemented
properly. Promoting multiple benefits may be a way to increase lands available for both
conservation and recreation. We support the protection and preservation of natural open
spaces stated as a goal of this plan element.
• The use of buffers and appropriate adjacent land uses is very important for maintaining
the multiple benefits of areas set aside for conservation and recreation. Recreational
activities that are incompatible with conservation goals should be directed towards more
appropriate areas.
Archaeological and Historic Resources
• We encourage the Town to investigate ways to combine archaeological and natural
resource protection. Important natural resource areas often overlap with significant
archaeological and historic resources. This may be a way to increase the amount of
conservation to the mutual benefit of both resources.
Mr. Bryant Nodine 5
Open Space and Natural
Resources Conservation
• We supportTown's the space and natural resource conservation goals. In
open p
. .
accordance with � we
Policy1119 again encourage the Town to participate in the ongoing
g
• conservation planningefforts, or consider developing your own Habitat
habitat
•
Conservation Plan. We volunteer our assistance in moving this process forward.
• We recommendadding critical habitat and recovery area designations for listed species as
"key habitat" areas within the Town.
Water Resources
• We support the Town's goal to protect and restore natural water sources and drainages
pp
within the Town.
• We recommend that the Town add language to Policy 12.1.1 that specifically mentions
riparian buffers. Buffering riparian areas with natural open space is important to
conserving their form and function.
thankyou for the opportunity to provide input regarding the update of the Town's General
We pp tY
Plan. We welcome the opportunity to discuss with you further any questions or concerns you
may have regarding our comments. If we can be of any assistance, please contact Scott
g arg
Richardson at (520) 670-6150 (x242) or Sherry Barrett at (x 223). Thank you for your
consideration of endangered species.
Sincerely,
1 y
AI
� r
Steve Spangl t
Field Supervisor
cc: Assistant Field Supervisor, Fish and Wildlife Service, Tucson, AZ
Habitat Branch Chief, Arizona Game and Fish Dept., Phoenix, AZ
p
Regional Supervisor, Arizona Game and Fish Department, Tucson, AZ (Attn: Joan Scott)
C:\Documents and Settings\scottrichardson\My Documents\Technical Assistance\OroValleyGP.comments.sr.doc
COMMENTS RECEIVED
FROM 60 - DAY REVIEW
AND OPEN HOUSES
APR 1 5 2005
CITY:OF
k. c"°�'a April 12, 2005
775
TUCSON Bryant Nodine, Planning and Zoning Administrator
Town of Oro Valley
CITY OF CommunityDevelopmentDepartment
De artment
TUCSON 11000 N. La Canada Drive
Oro Valley, Arizona 85737
DEPARTMENT OF
URBAN PLANNING Subject: General Plan Update, OV11-01-04
&DESIGN
Dear Mr. Nodine:
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the Town of Oro
Valley's (Town's) draft General Plan (Plan) update. Staff found the summaries of
key policy issues helpful and identified some items we might want to incorporate
into our General Plan when we update it.
As the City does not share any common jurisdictional boundaries with the Town,
our review focused on regional issues. Draft Plan policies refer to Town
cooperation with other jurisdictions on several items, for example, the need to
address increasing traffic, assess the feasibility of a regional public transit
authority, develop a regional trail system, implement the Sonoran Desert
Conservation Plan, etc.
Because the Town is located within the greater Tucson metropolitan area, it both
influences and is influenced by regional transportation and land use decisions. In
addition to traffic flow impacts of Oro Valley residents on other jurisdictions, the
Town may wish to consider through-traffic from residents of other jurisdictions.
Although it may be implied that the Town will participate in regional
transportation planning efforts, and will support solutions that benefit the regional
transportation system,we did not see this explicitly mentioned.
The City of Tucson values the Town's participation in regional transportation
planning efforts, and looks forward to working with the Town and other
jurisdictions to improve the regional transportation system.
Sincerely,
/
Albert F. E ias, AICP
Planning Director
Department of Urban Planning&Design
AE:GO/JH/j sh
C: Jim Glock, Director, Transportation
MAC ARTHUR BUILDING•345 E.TOOLE AVE.•P.O.BOX 27210.TUCSON,AZ 85726-7210
(520)791-4505,•FAX(520)791-4130 OR 791-2663.TTY(520)791-2639
www.tucsonaz.gov•E-Mail:vweb@tucsonaz.gov
7031 N. Paloma Dr MAR
Tucson, AZ 85704 2(Jp
11 March 2005
Oro Valley Planning and Zoning Commission
11000 N. La Canada del Oro
Oro Valley, AZ 85737
RE: Oro Valley General Plan Update 2020
Greetings:
review panel has recommended all back-up land use
I have recently learned that a .
Plan be dropped in the next plan that is sent to the voters
designations in the Oro Valley General pp
property on act ro
of Oro Valley. This change will have serious impact p P Y
my father has owned (for
and will also impact the future revenue
which I am trustee) in Oro Valley for almost 20 years, P
base of the Town of Oro Valley. The property question uestion is located on Oracle Road north of
• Vista Blvd (tax codes 225-11-226 and 225-10-002D).
Calle Concordia and south of Linda
Adjacent properties which have been markto• • eted ether with ours, all bounded by Oracle on the
g
east 'a on the south, and Linda Vista on the north, are
similarl,Eglestonacted. The present land-use des ig Drive on the west, Calle Concorde nation one which was retained in the last General
y ern P u designation sent to the voters, is Schools with a note for a back-up dgnanon of Commerce/Office
Park(COP). The current zoning designation is R1-144.
political currents that are driving this proposed change, and I am
. . I understand the strong and
thisapproved, leavingmyfather with property holding a 1
ver concerned that change will be pp
ydesignation-use desig n of Schools and a procedure for amending ending the plan later that is more difficult than
it is at present. In effect, this converts property that should be developed as commercial property
p y
the Town into zero-tax green space. I seriously doubt that
and provide tax revenues to thin with these
Amphitheater
School district has either the funds or the inclination to do anything
• sell the entire set of properties to Pima College several years ago
properties, and an attempt to
failed.
been allotted to nearbysimilar properties north and south of
Commercial designations have .
not believe that the proposal Schools designation without the
our property on Oracle Road. I do P P
• the and best use for thisproperty, for either our needs or for
back-up COP designation is highest .
that the proposal will result in a significant reduction
Oro Valley. I strongly believe p p designation
in marketability of thisproperty, and also believe that it will reduce future
boththevalueandthemarketabll y
desire of the citizens of Oro Valley is to have a General Plan
tax revenues for Oro Valley. If the
without back-up designations, theng
the designation for this entire block of properties should be
COP or a similar commercial designation rather than Schools.
COP land-use designation In summary, I urge that the be assigned to this block of
uestions please feel free to contact me. Thank you for your time.
properties. If you have any q �
Sincerely, • - ,
Jim Secan •.
219-7932 (h)/ 319-7773 (o)
ENOUGH LAND FOR HIGH TECH BUSINESS??
Page 29, Table
2 indicates that COP designated land is large - 721 acres—But a more
detailed analysis indicates that there are very few parcels available for new industry.
Acres #of Parcels # Owners
Honeywell) 138.75 21 19
All ready developed: (Incl yw }
Undeveloped Outside Town - State Land 222.33 6 1
Undeveloped Outside Town—Other 10.96 2 2
BigHorn
Commerce Center 2.87 1 1
Investments 8.09 1 1
La Cholla-Magee
Undeveloped Inside de Town- 444.26 31 13
TOTAL COP 802.50
DETAILS of UNDELOPED INSIDE TOWN AVAILABLE FOR NEW INDUSTRY
Owner Acres # of Parcels
Vistoso Partners 191.73 2
Vistoso Holdings 105.42 2
Vanderbilt Farms LLC 36.28 2
Overland Vistoso Limited Partners 27.31 4
Pacific International 8.41 1
First American Title Tr 4893 34.17 7
Walker Ronald& Rita CP/RS 1.29 1
Vistoso Gum Building LLC 1.17 3
Total Available For New Industry 405.78 ° 22
73% owned by 2 Groups
#Parcels>20 acres 4
#Parcels> 10 and<20 acres 4
#Parcels=> 1 and < 10 acres 10
#Parcels < 1 4
OTHER UNDEVELOPED NOT AVAILABLE/USEABLE FOR NEW INDUSTRY
Owner Acres # of Parcels
Ventana 31.32 2
Bighorn Commerce Center LLC 0.71 1
Glassworks of Oro Valley LLC 2.77 2
Securaplane Technologies LLC 1.33 1
Shur ward Storage Centers Inc 2.31 . 1
g _ .
Town of Oro Valley 0.06 1
Fidelity National Title TR 50009 0.01 1
Total Undeveloped—Not Available For New Ind 38.51 9
• 1 of 1 Created by pf114,g. McKee
4/7/05
COP Parcels in The General Plan
Area
OWNER(MAIL1) Acres IMP FCV IN_OV
UnDeveloped Parcels 186.78 0 YES
VISTOSO PARTNERS LLC 90 31 0 YES
VISTOSO HOLDINGS LLC 0 YES
VENTANA MEDICAL SYSTEMS INC 30.662 .03 0 YES
VANDERBILT FARMS LLC 0 YES
OVERLAND VISTOSO LIMITED PARTNEF 15.2 11 0 YES
VISTOSO HOLDINGS LLC 0 YES
OVERLAND VISTOSO LTD PARTNERSHII 11.89 11.25 YES
VANDERBILT FARMS LLC8 21 0 YES
PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL 0 YES
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE TR 4892&4893 620 YES
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE TR 4893 6.50.53 0 YES
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE TR 4893 55 95 0 YES
VISTOSO PARTNERS LLC 0 YES
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE TR 4892&4893 4.86 0 YES
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE TR 4892&4893 4.50 0 YES
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE TR 4892&4893 3.81 0 YES
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE TR 4892&4893 2.85 0 YES
SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS INC 2.311 0 YES
GLASSWORKS OF ORO VALLEY LLC 11 38 0 YES
GLASSWORKS OF ORO VALLEY LLC 0 YES
SECURAPLANE TECHNOLOGIES LLC 1.33
0 YES
WALKER RONALD&RITA CP/RS 1.29 0 YES
VISTOSO GUM BUILDING LLC 0.93
BIGHORN COMMERCE CENTER LLC 0.71 0 YES
VENTANA MEDICAL SYSTEMS 0.65 0 YES
VISTOSO GUM BUILDING LLC 0.23 0 YES
OVERLAND VISTOSO LTD PARTNERSHII 0.13 0 YES0 YES
OVERLAND VISTOSO LTD PARTNERSHII 0.07 0 YES
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 0.06
FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE TR 50009 0.01 0 YES0 YES
VISTOSO GUM BUILDING LLC 0.01
Total Undeveloped Within Town 444.26
STATE OF ARIZONA 157.18 0
STATE OF ARIZONA 24.76 0
STATE OF ARIZONA 13.33 0
STATE OF ARIZONA 10.81 0
STATE OF ARIZONA 8.56 0
LA CHOLLA-MAGEE INVESTMENTS LLC 8.09 0
STATE OF ARIZONA 7.69 0
BIGHORN COMMERCE CENTER LLC 2.87 0
Total Undeveloped Outside Town 233.29
Developed Parcels
MILLER SARAH TR 15.31 32,250 YES
1
EIGHT HUNDRED 12TH LTD PRTNRSHP 1.86 113,900 YES
ROUSSEL HOECHST MARION INC 4.52
MILLER SARAH TR 4.00 178,400 YES
GHESR INC 1.41 254,100 YES
ARIZONA SELF STORAGE ASSOC LLC 2.59 263,000 YES
MATRIXX EQUITIES LLLP 1.71 285,900 YES
NETMEDIA INC 1.32 315,300 YES
TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LLC 2.35 354,900 YES
SOUTHWEST PARKS&MONUMENTS"*. 3.00 363,400 YES
00 YES
MATRIXX EQUITIES LLLP 1.73
SECURAPLANE TECHNOLOGIES LLC 1.31 484,900 YES
RCDK REALTY I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 2.79 643,500 YES '
RUSTY ADAMS INVESTMENTS LLC 5.10 679,200 YES
ARIZONA SELF STORAGE ASSOC LLC 2.41 8873,500 YES
3 100 YES
AJC PROPERTIES LLC 1.94 ,
SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS INC 1.28 1,198,000 YES
HDP NORTHWEST LLC 6.02 3,065,000 YES
VENTANA MEDICAL SYSTEMS INC 19.57 5,484,000 YES
GARRETT CORP 13.80 12,380,000 YES
GARRETT CORP 44.73 12,380,000
Total Developed incl Honeywell(Garrett) 138.75
Total COP within Town 524.47 '
Total COP Outside Town 278.02 Includes Honeywell(Garrett)
Grand Total 802.50
Without Honeywell 743.96
1 of 1
C:\Documents and Settings\Doug\My Documents\Oro Valley\Retail Business\gp_comm2COP.xis
• OFFICE OF LEGAL COUNSEL
Todd A. Jaeger, J.D.
VICia
.: • • •:::::i Associate Superintendent
(520)696-5156
ASITIVITHEATEIR FAX (520) 696-5074
P. u L r c .S r_ o 1 701 W.Wetmore Road•Tucson,AZ 85705 •TDD(520)696-5055
GOVERNING BOARD MEMBERS Kent Paul Barrabee,Ph.D. Patricia J.Clymer Jeff Grant Linda Loomis,Ph.D. Nancy Young Wright
President Vice President
SUPERINTENDENT
Vicki Salentine,Ph.D.
April 5,2005
Via E-Mail and U.S.Mail
Bryant Nodine, AICP
Community Development Department
Planning and Zoning Administrator
Town of Oro Valley
11000 N.La Canada Dr.
Oro Valley,AZ 85737
Re: OV11-01-04, General Plan Update
Submission of Comments
Dear Mr.Nodine:
I wish to extend my thanks to you and the Town Council for the opportunity to comment on
the Draft General Plan Update on behalf of Amphitheater Public Schools. The document was
obviously a considerable undertaking, and I congratulate you, your staff and the Steering Committee
on the result. In general, we are pleased by the recurring references to the Town and the District
working together. After all,we do serve the same public.
After reviewing the draft plan and identifying all provisions relevant to the District, I would
like to offer some specific comments. I hope this will be of some benefit to your continuing work.
For your convenience,I have copied language from the draft plan(identified by bold typeface)
so that my comments are perhaps easier to follow.
GENERAL PUBLIC FACILI I S AND SERVICES
6.1 To ensure that adequate public facilities and services are provided when needed.
We agree that, all too often, the infrastructure for development follows the development, Also
all too often,however, many do not consider public schools in the context of necessary infrastructure,
but schools are in fact a very significant part of the infrastructure which is absolutely necessary to
develop and maintain a successful community.
In the case of school in particular, their construction simply cannot follow children. We must
be prepared to serve the community's educational needs before they arise. Having more opportunity
Amphitheater High•Canyon del Oro High•Ironwood Ridge High•Amphitheater Alternative
Amphitheater Middle School•Coronado K-8 School•Cross Middle School•La Cima Middle School•Wilson K-8 School
Copper Creek Elementary•Donaldson Elementary•Harelson Elementary•Holaway Elementary•Keeling Elementary
Mesa Verde Elemental},•Nash Elementary•Painted Sky Elemental},•Prince Elementary•Rio Vista Elementary•Walker Elementary
Rillito Center•El Hogar
Page 2
April 7, 2005
for input and participation in the review of development proposals would allow us to better predict
and meet community needs.
We are grateful to you and your department for keeping the District informed of pending land
use issues which may concern us, and we hope our input is helpful as decisions are made.
6.1.2 The Town shall require that all new developments be evaluated to determine impacts on all public facilities
within the town,including but not Iimited to schools and roads.Such impacts shall be used as a criteria in
deciding the approval or denial of land use rezoning proposals.
We agree with this statement. Indeed, we would suggest that the impact upon infrastructure,
and in particular upon schools, should be a heavily weighted criterion. Any impact upon infrastructure
in our case is a direct impact upon children.
SCHOOLS
6.2 To promote joint land use planning and the shared use of facilities.
6.2.1 The Town shall continue to work with local school districts to ensure coordinated planning of school
facilities and exchange of information concerning development and planning-related issues. This should
include defining both school service areas and associated school needs that can potentially be met through
proactive implementation at the time of development review.
We very much appreciate the Town's support of schools through this language and the bullets
under this section (which I have not restated here). We note that the draft, as before, includes specific
criteria for provision of school sites where school children are forecasted to reside, where those
forecasts reach a certain level,but that the language has been expanded to include middle schools.
This most recent draft includes other language which we believe is responsive to concerns we
last raised and we appreciate the Town's and the Committee's efforts in this regard. For example, it
includes language addressing the cumulative effect of smaller developments,rather than just the larger
one, and language encouraging voluntary contributions by developers. We believe this language
crucial,particularly in light of the manner in which development is cul ently occurring.
6.2.3 The Town shall require an evaluation of the adequacy of school facilities as a finding for all residential land
uv rPn»Pctc hefnrP the Planning and7nnina f nnini;ceinn of tha 11nn tinea of ra7nni
�f��` � {�Vv VViVti ML M.V V V1.VtJV it Y1G.
I hope this language can be strengthened with some indication of the impact which a finding
of inadequate school capacity should have upon land use requests. Requiring an evaluation or finding
b
of school capacity is an appropriate term, but it begs the question what if capacity is insufficient? A
Page 3
April 7,2005
finding that sufficient capacity exists should be a prerequisite to any land use decision which will
increase student enrollment.
FAIR SHARE ALLOCATION OF COSTS
4.1 To ensure that new development pays its fair share of the additional costs of extending or improving public
service facilities and systems and that these costs do not financially burden existing residents.
We agree with this language. In our setting, however, the District does not have complete
control over building schools where growth exists. The policies of the School Facilities Board impose
significant restrictions upon our actions in this regard. Developer support of schools, through
financial or real estate donations, may be the only means for the District to build the neighborhood
schools which the plan contemplates if the School Facilities Board will not authorize and fund
construction.
TRANSPORTATION EFFICIENCY
5.3 To design a transportation network that promotes the reduction of traffic volumes and vehicle miles traveled.
5.3.1 The Town shall require that pedestrian and bicycle pathways are constructed,where feasible,to separate bike
and pedestrian traffic from motorized vehicles in order to provide safe access to schools, parks, other activity
centers,and the Town's trails network.
We applaud the Town's continuing efforts to build pedestrian and bicycle pathways which
provide a safe means for students to go to and from school.
JOINT USE OPPORTUNITIES
8.6 To maximize the use of community resources by developing and operating joint-use recreational facilities
with local school districts,community colleges,and private organizations.
8.6.1 The Town shall cooperate with other jurisdictions, resource management agencies, school districts, and
private organizations to develop joint-use and multiple-use facilities that benefit and address the
recreational and social needs of the community.
We recognize the secondary role our schools can play in providing recreational resources to
our community. The under funding of education in the State of Arizona, however, has compelled
school districts to conserve resources to maximize their use in the classroom and for students. For
example, the requirement that our District reduce its utility costs by approximately$1,000,000 in the
next five years compels us to ensure that other entities making use of our facilities pay for their share
of those utilities. Because our capital budget is also very,very limited,we must also conserve the use
Page 4
April 7,2005
of some of our facilitiesp or improvements which have finite lives, or must also charge those who use
elements for the wear and tear put upon them to enable their replacement or repair.
those
We believe,
therefore,that this statement should reflect awareness that there are other needs of
the community (beyond the recreational and social ones mentioned) which are in fact the priinai y
purpose for the facilities referenced. In our case specifically, school fields, basketball courts, tennis
courts,
auditoriums and the like have finite lives. Our funding, such as it is, is merely intended to
provide
facilities with a "school life." Facilities which must serve broader needs of the community
will require additional support beyond our state funding.
In closing, again a ain wish to thank you, the Committee and certainly the Council Members for
opportunity to comment. If you have any questions about my concerns or comments, please let
this pp ty
me know.
I will certainly look forward to seeing the General Plan completed in the near future.
Sincerely,
Todd A. Jaeger,J.D.
Associate to the Superintendent
General Counsel
TAJ/cnn
cc: Dr.Vicki Balentine, Superintendent
Amphitheater Governing Board Members
Oro Valley Town Council Members
et p rT{'�: G2• ..
G H
`lY
;.: � ` PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT �` =���s �� j
krilWapq:, Y 4.rr,
r4;fret.Y-i2aill Carmine DeBonis Jr. Planning Division
-. r...:: `;........:::
Director Comprehensive Plan Section
......_....
rc�'�{ • UeveloplIellt Seraires
March 25, 2005
Bryant Nodine, Planning and Zoning Administrator
Town of Oro Valley, Community Development Department
Planning and Zoning Division
11000 N. La Canada Drive
Oro Valley, Arizona 85737
RE: Town of Oro Valley General Plan Update - Review Comments
Dear: Mr. Nodine:
Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on the Town of Oro Valley's General Plan
(Update).
We appreciate any policies and goals intended by the Town's Update to coordinate our
respective plans for development of the region, specifically these policies:
4.1 .8.1 In unincorporated areas within the Planning Area, the Town shall work with Pima
County to ensure that new development contributes to the construction of public
facilities at the Town's service level standards.
11 .2.8.1 The Town shall work as an equal partner with federal, state, and county agencies
and the public in the development and implementation of the Sonoran Desert
Conservation Plan.
Given the land use consumption challenges facing eastern Pima County, it is disappointing to
note that "All amendments to decrease intensity of development inside a designated Growth
Area will be a major amendment" is proposed by the update for deletion as a Major
Amendment (p. 10). Similarly, the encouragement of mixed use development with pedestrian
and bicycle access is proposed for deletion.
In the near future, as we hope to undergo a closer review of the Pima County Comprehensive
Plan's designated growth areas, we will consider two of the Town of Oro Valley's growth areas
(1) the Oracle Road/Magee Road/lna Road, and (2) Foothills Mall growth areas.
In our review of the mapped planned land uses of the Pima County Comprehensive Plan and the
Town's General Plan, we found essentially comparable and/or complementary land uses.
According to the Comprehensive Plan, the area north of Magee Road and west of the Town's
201 N. Stone Avenue, 2"d Floor, Tucson, Arizona 85701 I Tel:(520)740-6800 Fax:(520)623-5411
incorporated boundaries (west of the Rancho Vistoso development) is designated a low-density
rural designation abutting
si nation a buffer of lower density residential and open space land use
designations.
The activitycenters near La Cholla Boulevard and Ina Road and Magee Road of
the Comprehensive Plan are comparably planned by the General Plan for high intensity uses.
significant difference between the plans appears to be the area north of the Town of Oro
The g
Valley and west of Catalina. The Town's General Plan proposes a combination of Rural Low
Density, Low DensityResidential, and Master Planned Community on the east half of the area
with The Pima CountyComprehensive Plan designates
the west half designated Open Space.
more than 2/3 of the area as Resource Transition (a very low density residential land use) and
Low IntensityUrban land use for the remaining 1/3 on the east side. Both plans emphasize Big
Wash as a special entity. The Town's General Plan designates the eastern half of the area as a
"Significant Resource Area" entailing special policies.
As a final note, in our review packet I found no explanation of the revised land use changes on
the General Plan's map, which may have been helpful.
If you have any questions, please call me at (520) 740-6800.
Sincerely,
Janet Emel, Senior Planner
Janet.Emel@dsd.pima.gov
cc: Arlan Colton, Planning Official
Manabendra Changkakoti, Comprehensive Plan Administrator
201 N. Stone Avenue, 2"d Floor, Tucson, Arizona 85701 jTel:(520)740-6800 I Fax:(520)623-5411
Nodine, Bryant __ _..... ... . ..T - _ __.. ..._
From: General Plan Comment Form [webmaster@Ci.oro-ValleY.azUSI
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 4:45 PM
To: Comment Form
Subject: RESPONSE
Name = Don Bristow
Contact Information = 229-9278
Plan Adrnendments Qi Y/N =
Plan Admendments Q1-Comments =
Plan Admendments Q2-Comments = Need to include that all Town sponsored
development projects, for example, Town buildings, parks, roads, road art
P
work, etc, shall be reviewed and approved by the DRB to assure appearance
is compatable with surrounding developments .
For example the appearance standards used for the "art work" along
Tangerine Road and LaCanada Road. The sound and retainer walls along La
Canada were made to blend in with the existing surroundings., and compatable
with the residential areas . However, the same can' t be said for Tangerine
Road. The retainer walls constucted between Red Mountain Drive and Copper
Spring Trail are not compatable with the surrounding residential areas, and
P g
are more like what might be found in an industrail area. To prevent a
repeat of this incompatability between neighborhood architectural guidelines and adjacent road's "art work there needs to be a review
process established. This process is probably best handled by the Town' s
DRB. Plan Admendments Q3-Comments =
Policy Revisions Qi Y/N =
Policy Revisions Ql-Comments =
Policy Revisions Q2-Comments =
Policy Revisions Q3-Comments =
Significant Resources Q1 Y/N =
Significant Resources Q1-Comments =
Significant Resources Q2-Comments =
Significant Resources Q3-Comments =
Station#4 - Land Use Maps Ql Y/N =
Station#4 - Land Use Maps Q1-Comments =
Station#4 - Land Use Maps Q2-Comments =
Station#4 - Land Use Maps Q3-Comments =
General Questions Q1 Y/N =
General Questions Ql-Comments =
1
Jones, Jennifer
From: Nodine, Bryant
Sent: Thursday, March 31,2005 8:55 AM
To: Jones, Jennifer
j
give you printed versions of the comments I've received. Two other comments from the open
111
houses:
need to inform people about the plan and meetings through water bill inserts.
1. We p p
2. Don't
include the "Tortolita Area" in the Planning Area.
Bryant Nodine, AICP
Planning and Zoning Administrator
Town of Oro Valley
11,000 North La Canada
Oro Valley, Arizona 85704
bnodine@orovalley.net
(520) 229-4807
1
. Lan p anning resources
i .,. ,,,p17.,
MAP: 1 U ".-u1-1-
270 North Church fluenue. Tucson Rrizona 135701 •
[520)628-1118 - fai:.626-7637
March 8,2005 .
' Mr. Bryant Nodine
. Plann ng Director- .
- --Town of Oro Valley . " - ..
Oro valley;Arizona 85736 .
Subject: General Plan Update: Request for Consideration
.Dear Bryant:. - . . . i . . - , .
I recently met with Mr.Neil Mannink,whose familyowns property immediately south of Ironwood
Ridge High School and just west of the Catalina Baptist Church(See Exhibit 1). Mr.Manning,
*hose family has-owned this land for years,would like to master plan their property,then develop it
- over time. In between the Manning parcel and the Catalina.Baptist Church is a small "cut-off'parcel
- still owned by the Kai fainly(See Exhibit 2)...T14s parcel was left when.Amphitheater.School
. District condemned part of the Kai property-for Ironwood High School. ' . ,'
. - - ,• As you recall,the Church �arcel was acquir=ed prior to.the School District condemnation. Please
P.
note,that had the.School District not condeinned.the way they did,this portion of the Kai property
could be planned as part of the rest of tlhe.:Kai-property to the north,and would not have been
-isolated,•But,the School District did clot wish to acquire this little area,effectively leaving it without
r • ,the ability to gain.access without crossing a significant wash.and it's riparian.area.
These two owners have agreed to:cooperate.i n a j oiht.plan. By combining these properties,certain
lain ink benefits can be accomplished for the area,especially as they relate to access,which Will be
key to,preservation of the riparian-area. It also meets the Town goal of clustering in order to
preserve the most significant riparian areas.
.In this case,"clustering"does not mean high density. The Town does not have a cluster option
contained it its zoning regulations. .So,what is being discussed here is still not a small lot project,
but rather still retaining acre-minimum lots,but providing a way for these lots to be designed so there
is minimum-disturbance to the riparian area. -
- Also,by allowing the.opportunity to change zoning, it also gives the ToNN in the ability to preclude
certain activities within the riparian,areas that would be harmful,but which are common to large lot
properties,such as clearing all the vegetation to allow for horses,donkeys,and other pets that are
• -NOT compatible with presenting NATURAL open space.
planningarchitecture De urban design deuelopmentlandscape consultants
To illustrate this Neil Manning and I met with Scott Richardson,USF&WS,to discuss the best
point,. ,.
wa to developthis property from a biologic standpoint, and create the least impact for the
y
. endangered Pygmy Owl. He suggested we"cluster"the development and leave the riparian areas
alone. He did not have a problem with"clustered" acre lots,where the major goal of preserving the
wildlife(riparian)corridors is met. •
alsonote that when Ironwood Ridge was constructed,the contractor actually graded part of the
We
- Manningproperty,thus,there is already some environmental degradation to the property.
What we would request.then.is that the Town General Plan Update Review Committee and staff
consider our request to revise their recommendations for these properties as follows:
•
1.That they be included within the Service Area Boundaries of the Town of Oro Valley
2.That they be designated for Low Density Residential (0.4-1.2 DU/AC).
In doing so,a number of Town General Plan policies will be met. These include,but are not limited
to:
1. 1.1 "The Town shallp romote clustering of developthent to protect environmentally sensitive
•
areas....I
1.1.2. This policy calls for preservation of significant"rolling" areas where there are 15%or greater
. cross slopes. We note that this is NOT hilly areas with significant slopes.
•
1.2.1. "The Town shall rnaintain Oro Valley's predominantly low-density character while considering
the needs of financial stability and infrastructure efficiency. ".We would note that the development
of Ironwood Ridge and the Baptist Church projects have brought substantial mnfi-astructure into this
area,which would be substantially under-used for lower density development.
- 1.2.1. "The Towel shall encourage the location of residential neighborhoods close to activity centers
compatible with residential uses...." Certainly,by any planning definition,a major high school and a
major church with.plans for expansion.to include complete school facilities,would be considered an
activity center.
•
1.4.10 "The Town shall establish procedures to ensure the
coordinated development of vacant areas
of 40 acres or more either under multiple or single ownership bv requiring the development of.master
• plans for those areas...."-•
_ V
.Byproviding an incentive to these two owners,.they will work together to prepare a plan,still for low
P g
density development,but that will recognize the fact that they abut major public institutions.
Schools,churches,and related uses,especially of the magnitude of this school and this church and its
related facilities, are not best utilized by isolating them from the very public they serve. Currently,
ever voile going to Ironwood or to the Catalina Baptist Church must drive. It is only good planning to
•allow adjoining residential areas that would allow at least some users to Walk to these facilities.
By careful and thoughtful planning,this can be done while still minimizing any impact to the washes
that do contain important riparian areas. But, at this time, there is little reasoii these properties
should be classified as "Significant Resource Areas" and"Rural Low Density"when compared to all
the other areas of Oro Valley(See Exhibit 3). In fact,these designations are far more appropriate in
areas with significant topography;more significant washes and riparian areas, and other more
environmentally sensitive areas. ,
•
El pLanning 1esouIcS planning landscape archilecture urban design development consultants
270 Horth Church Ruenue.Tucson Arizona 85701 [521))128-1116 fax:628-7637
2111 East Broadway Road.Suite 14.Tempe Arizona 85282 n [61)2)791-5157 fait:[OM 121-1511
BY allowing these two properties to be combined,access can be created to the considerable flat,
degraded, and otherwise non-sensitive areas that abut high activity,high noise,highly night-lit areas
that are actually poor quality for habitat preservation. And,by allowing these two property owners
to work together,it provides incentive to properly preserve those areas that do deserve set-aside in
accordance with the goals of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Town of Oro Valley.
We are and will be available for fu ther discussion with staff and the Committee.
.
Sincerely, V
44 ,_..7.X.Z______:_...—/
Carl Winters .
Principal
Enclosures: . .Exhibit A-Manning Property
Exhibit B-Kai Property .
- Exhibit C—Riparian Areas
CC:-- • Mr.Neil Manning
Mr. Sid Felker
05004
Elanning iBSUUiCS planning landscape archil ecture urban design deuelopment consultants
':1'. [El
270 forth Church Ruenue,Tucson Rrizona 85701 I§ [5201 628-1118 fax:628-7537
2111 East Broadway Road,Suite 14,Tempe Ilrizona 85282 0 [602)791-5157 far:[460)921-9561
•may_..rr-= .:, _ j7 L -:�.::1�' - is
;r - Ittql;.'Uliti4*;77.t.',
a't,-,'J�'3r ri ,J^^.s*'•' �G t ! i'...;:;•:::.::,•1:'..-7',.:.::::: ::$1,!.; ::',--%:;,..;.:•.,
.,i,," ;:.• �; r,1 - .fib'-.;;- '
, • - - ,,,,-7-3 - '4•4}�'�'a,;1�.�5.t•.::>r-;••s.J�:i�-'i,i-,'t•;... +_"1{ •_ '•A •�Y:E �:.r'i••- •i. '
,�±a,, 'L]-t;i. :.•�,t•.:c."i!1 ti .-''e:• is`:T-•: 2r t t- i l ittl' '}} `yt j.t. tlFt �'�}'r ''ti.` t -i.:�'-'rl .1-
i - r_ ..ii]- .,s ! Viti.:',.,'.::.i.15 •cr '.i•ls,-rt. ] s a..: F.. a:'+,_ _•tP
.J 16.__. ? __ * sr ( J' • ^i T
�� .= 1 �:' ,Y-y1� + .tT�r ar� s
I - .., iii• - i '•• - i},-`��rt.'!= T1, t { T! - J '_,-ICL 'i.,
�k =L>:,,.if' _ r - _ !.r'' n5 •`: ;r,.% _�.,,
.. ' ^ � 1 :4„1,47
~ . t LJ 5 n•��i:-:;'�:.:[77--- -� i.„ :x ,c' 4-�-,-_:•Ji::.'.F. .1]�"...... �� '
,,17,,,,.--
k.. -. , r.•....._.. -r-•_-:' i,a-J,i�.3,T.:-r.rI ;?-<a., Js . R•, rf :i •• R_ i.,-
1 - :r f-7:-..
'_ 7 •RM i-+Wa------2-------F- --.----
.. : •: -_�• r, . ., ';.1 -b ...::,..!,.-!,..i„,,-:.,,,:-::,..,..;.:1:-:::,..
jl -i _ ';'',tr
C' V !
T ti'-TJi
t
4 _ 1
:3 _ s
,,,f` :.+,.' _l"tr.:=-saa%..__...__ �.].•.: ..tJ.!1�=.:v2it:ri.•
,t,n-.�Y7e f'r'ie:i,t ...- ....._ -.-....•�..r,_ ri_L } . r 4� -
�`;..-rY4rT:. JIv :..-...•_,< _- .-_.. t-:Y•C :s-tr �,:i-4,a., :i ..�_Tr,:. -'.�' +? -
• T, -ai st-, ..tn' ara.-•-.. ,:a.u�.rlt•:.�•:9�r'.ax•1�.� }��-].,. _ �I'.�.n-"`_r,�..D,.,. �:1::•'rr;....�• .... ai 'i - -
+C �' 't:: •.g A. '�'C-lt-r",_�T L.•- _r ;�•:_ =4! s y:. a. i''•,r ;jtlL�"f- -.Ir"'!�_,r, ;:•��.•� .�„Mi•'].. 'Vii'.�,a-:� :.i s:
� ��-.r=�3•..ti u L --{7'- .-a'E,•r T - _'t4.JJ'r..._r.C(:.: -t-_ ��r s_c I.. �•�{ s i�L._ � k,tL. ■_.t.S.. � ��
,!r_ .ti.. �,• f. -:•Zt.- wr,.. ,1. �. _rC�:. rY''� :I:' ..�i �•r.��-M" .{ :i• .i!�R•�'Y .-:' .,•(w. •1• i � ®'
•ate.•' -µ-::t•sJ.-rx=�ct�. -, »J. ...rte :r..(!- lo,:`-4r:ra _1.I.v :it.,_:..
If�:i;._,r. t}•,.1. �« y -l`. - _ •1':' rt• k e-a\ �.vr_r ':F•� .JS'•{. 'tls1::_+ .� 1
- .::j-'�• is .J:r F:r:...� :it -1. •r' .h•Y
c-• r••r•i-� •r.� � 'f.'r•t.'_�- z 11-' -:c:=. ..s..y. 'il",:,.' •+i:
7.:i:, . I,r ..�,. •y t� .,3 ::i a-+sii: VIII,rT,y _ii - .rry'a .'i:!'i`, r. �•
1. _.r 1. M'! jay. ilr•CL, ( !���•:;,, •.1'':,' .i.YC' '1j. ~! -,M•:i'- `t
L`f'.`.1JIi;:. - .r' _,•'r• 'ti:.•.•.:3L ''.,Qp` � -.r.>:rt�{r�r1�: .ti' 'it r:•r.,._ ..7,•-.. `'4 !:,:.s: '1 •r:'r ;Ii a,Si',•'a.
.R {. :A--�ti_-.Y..._�,i�j+.�f ��-• .,i}. _ :1..]}.. T, r C' �1:1':i:•-:Yc:rti�.. :':3�«:• :r 'l; •:Z..x!s" -r
r✓-:�f^- 'i�a`.�' r!r- ,3: .•Y l� -ai_'• •.:..tY�' ♦J: t•_ .r „z .1 .. -rt1 �.,::•�• j Y. e''•i � a..
J r.tiY :✓ -\••._ ,✓: 1.�'L' t .a�:� i•!'Y 1 E - u, •I I
I f.:! 'S5: 1, .�,t.. J-L.•�'r:: - r - F i'-•.r_�- .tJ!.r.r.._ tl':.g;,Pik;11:i...::.e.'....trg....t_
:''' .•t .�;?:.. -,�J :::.-1:.'':• _t x• '.r1. `:i•''--LY' e.i: .3»t -.t.,_t...:1.;:.•;.•.:rrr.�. .+l�r" .i:7';. -..-3::'='L:.M i ,i-=�! ]I'r^-- fes:. rte'St_ r_ _•.rH.; ��ri-• ^i..`:,��:.. .l-• .:.}:,�-. ._T.. _'1:. -J• _%- ..R:t.Fl-y-_ ,-!- _ ^t1IJ•._ a`� r :a r•,t Ih. ►." :!-::' :2•:. .4'I►.c2:' ai :•ti.• J � ,a .a..•:lF'Y A: . _Lea-r`• � Fr :��..t' •�• -Is. i!:">,_.. tt�:.. rrii ::S'f:A�.���:'....s ,�w 't!: 1� i.�_ jr�. �}�{.•tomt/-L y '.i. . L':''':'): _ �.Ih -F _:;_:i%+`"'_:7'�!t-_-i.. �•i`. r,:, -F''�3..e_� :7'Sr rr. rl7• .i• .:.. s^:, :ti. r" s �_S• , •:F_•'�'^•%l"- :.i }_.. •• •tc:r:..a '1,' 1.. LIC•- 1 r r::. �t �.y r_ _ `i't',L. �:...t- ,:c: •.la, =ic .v. } �_ I r S•' r:'f :+I.:i.'!h].••!t•• ,t. ',:]: `:�r::' -i5' .':i:.� ®''�•t: sl. .'� - ,.,3"- :1: . ..M.:.. -'.i"{'::. -'tt. ::::i-~�9' -Sf_:Ji .:,F_••• .,..••x7.a. •.<_ :•i-. - '•RD /r V La..,..,,-+..i..r..-.w,•P...r _ '� ..^:`:-'•�9 .r� \f:.• t•..•u.a�: I.j ::•(•`• t._J�!.Nr r. .1 _ - L:'J.::�.s:•- .u J'-J. ,:.a,t F .r._:Ir.y_ -s.',Rr .0- - t.�J'.- .,.-1 _ -•a4 _-e J1 --.1lx r: •lt.::_:: _+,r't 1- ..:'r-'J' :]�' •rt..• .,.•^:'S`•..a.- 31 n '':.] �. �' :-!:,: r� "_ �.., �..r, - .r.' :SIL.- .�;..3:},:�ti'r' ,ts:�: ]• :•.] ;•7-• 1
-i a-. ii'�
/ ��.• .}f- tin .,.,.. •'ti.' ....L. ',ii'i:.-
•�:t 'a.:,.t1 -.n 7�-•• } ~?•- L. :�L •r_ '3.' +:�,.�: •:t.!.' ISI•, •t}�::.�., - Ir
_ �i•�f' -j rir• aY'C"1 aI� - rl -'•-:f � srJx -yr1_.]. .f, •.•T•:• io,:�3.?'i;.. z•.fr.. .�•s`J'.a��ii� t
r-'i T -�.e. 4r Y:.ar '1 ��� / T•. 'i•M'... ar' 'C-t/.Y ii ,i,. •'�.r rLr� -•i, i i_.. .r - itt ��r
.!•... ,,��ee�� i:`.1 3.4 -•R''�:t:i.! :ia..••r:�•!.J Iv�� r _.i'=:T=':'•:hl'
'«'j ii'':f .1.. .ti.;Z ..« } .i. •�rJ�'•', .lv •r..,•+s .:iti' 't :]�'' j„ i.
t t. ! J=,' - i!_ - .at. ..".tai• 7 .r, 'i r:: - -:Fi•=
i .9g
Jew tt. ':: - •.{� .l. '�•.. 7_.
Ir Lr. ,,��`` r;7' (� 1 tl `t •'� 'Air. ':Y 1. �'
gra: _ r - "r:
it�•'•7r .I,' :J- (y� i!^.•..�'-" a..i.. yr.:'
tiI � - 1-• �-1 ya: :n-•L. F
L- •:L� 3
lt's' i r'
,:l::tv '4 l
tr ..�r
+- .i:•' T'.,, .7 '1 .�< �.',L'e.. _ ...�::��" :S. .•1::�- ::t .T .i^'-
._ r>= .C:'"t� N.!.!:'a', .fit_i L. '''}- ti •]w::-yi�t{:: ,,.. :w r. :14,-....f,44-',A5!:
::J.. •ai:. :S,_. jl�. '}..• ..0`,: •'.i. ti
i• 71 -,. :.• '!J;1. �4. t - :'L:.,.�: `r-Y.�:,..:•s.i' •.r... `'�r: Ftt!• ••-r it.
�f.4:.a.-�:t .t 1'.,ii .i_. iY . :•i:J.. - �7`. ,•t :- •r ••i. :�.` _L-:!' _ :':t
t•u:�i�. ,t,• .! 7:{.. ••d- - - 1. s. ,i1�- 'p,A�,•. .y• _ •-: iata-4..47.,..,„,.
i =t r-7 :yFYI :1. .,J.. :lsl�-.. .i' Y .z..:;St'11,41V4-01:1:171(4.i.,;.,.;!:;i:N;10:45-45,
- r, is - - ••rs •]. J::yr.-. _ Wit'
•r r tfi:•� L a -
- :•1•': "'7 : .ice•• •ItsG. •r ri' -r•-Q-. :.t: , .u' :r.e iii+tirqZ• .J.
W
r:
ti.,T• - ..y% .tom- • t.! 1110,,.,(4..i„ii,'L. •,•t i,t.3�so', .' rt.. ia` .� aC- •iVr.
ri•'i•F•i J :�. :i-.:=::r •3. L, \t:! l ��i,.''1'! si ..L �y: ..r �,r
•rt' - �i .f!'S'. iJ.. `I"t- :.t- -":1.,'►n •.-•. 'a::.:Cr'�'�rr'•i::- -
�,,..moi:.: ,-, _,`�.
i a ''. .i!'Jt.
PI�
dT• - .r-
'ill::. _ t.,. '.t:r, .�. .r�:�:: •� l"
r.'. r"•sem •:1 ..:>�
.1:'. •.ff"-J ., ,... p art. .L ti L" 'i r.
�7� L•Jr. ... `i'
F•
•r ,• - 1L. Irk• .!.!,
F V ��' r��
r:t-.:A::w
r. i
t� -:s c� -a r'• a-
L •:r'.
- t_. •nr
- x , q
Nlifg:11.,1,7.,
I qi..�%i� "IC r' n- 'i "1.:-:'' •ice: t� L -.r... !I"r. Vii. i +i-'/ ' ' 111ii _ .r to +i`•:. �...y!..: a.at'• ,'., .t'L..i- / T' i�•T• 4� i i- j. t.;aCC 1rA / i •1 M r-� -'- ist,J•• :.c�. 1.� •r...i l F�.h.
_ 'tom: L r?: • i.- J l =r =:ei`_.J u•. •t%i.,::-rte ,�'.d^:.C.- F
'%s• .T. ..r.. �yI
_ � r ,.: lister `�
�•'yvr.]?tca r r '.'..'`.''Ss:F=•ii.,,,+'"=:ii vt:,,,,IiforiqittiarizoNiu.,.ttN:!'7t .:.f'-:_''i<. .i..ti,�,n ti';,..,..-. f•..U_•7� ® 4!Of-
:
.,Ci'+:!@1. i.: k: �ty tF..�t....:+•,_.:0,.F'�.:•f�.-,sTf�' K, .:.� �".�: � :1. .YY.: r iJ.',L7�•'J=�'" •:�" 7" �!• t..i ._ _. ,=F.'i`..L'-'.. _ �'"�,. .u:. i[. «.�,..t�..i is H.r�,.. 1 15': ,i.-:ea;• d�t... t.4, - �-;- � s.-�'r1• r:?.x::'C.•sri...«r,u:'i-":t"�E �•!f'y�_ r. _ T+!',. !�: �aa•.,..1�,• ";5:... V•..r4 i;K. :.T.t-..tt.•'J: ...F. .•t,'.•.A.�'-L�:�' 'I'"a r--- :J--Zt -... _a"'ty?iS..,.•t ,".':- _ - •-. '`�:i:iii.�"i:l::_i�. i�•�r�rt�,:l',+•i:�•,',:"!.;" ,Ka.:��:_•-•� � ���,:..,:-f, � - f•� '•7 a•:i�� ' i,'•a .•..• :i. y'!i":...>;.ii:�}.�itY:i'.-r�s�•'' !- 'r-. :ii_:!,3..:_::•�:- _.-,d .s:••• 's.%.; ,
ififfii.;;Ik.!'.:44..-1'.!::::'-Z-:‘Ili
..L:'�..- : .]•ti. t.at_s.1iMr•.s .F- =:r.talti>••Tr. 'wir-s« -'1�- �?i{'_`.T ►z• :7t_ _ r. :.r•:{. t.... ,r.y .: �::"l•.on_ 'k,:C:ri.. �; •�., - t' - iA�s_r.i 'i:'. �t{c. �- ������i_l.Cff
't: ^_ .?z.: zy•_ �] l' rt, I _ ::':. .r s ..:t'''.1.. _ _Y-..'��'t• t.L�P _ sf>7�:f,„_. _..fiArr::.'-..J'�. :.._,a.,_,+..<, a-.. .'...:.;..._�._ L_•.H'_y :'t.+ ..a: �'�:{}� m:,;•^: .::t.;•` =.,•-I�P:i'c.c. ••1-.._zrY."::� ��.w_t...,v-r-�4i.:.' ..✓ .}.yam-ll ,1 .�Ti,_•'�. a.. r, .J.. 'J� - .. A... -�.] .1 .. 1,'�aa... _:p :,.;r.:.• ' . j'P. '.5�;_:" ..��.:L•q�`;c' I` lrS=i•_•L'' ..a.-_.a 'a^'��'•:! t - � ;•!,`'.. t. MMP...L a_ :.y .i-�:�•I' :i:�•�_,,,��:.':'+: {{ .,-•I• '"ice 'i-T.7„ 'y": ::%Ir"'~-i!' - ".':,Ly-.r r:N 'rt .-,.. ._.,!r 1J .',c- 1•Y�- ti• .i= ,-•--:. . +. ,•-':''' ,i.. .i:••-• ri•.. "'=:t: f,. • ..,V!;. -•'i -'':+i._ r-•... .r.. .1 ..N�: ,tii:..a ..�a.,ii-:: J'k.:-, :i .,r. t:" .Sr. :� .<1'..,} .rF:•FLa:':.'tl:•. ._.. •+itv-
1 _.�.. 7.'..�ayi. - ::^ _L]'�: - :1�•.� 1.•.. iei'..,. .,f, tr ..._t J,_. .1••'y .�sti -:�"i J "1:::. „' •:c' :%�y,,,•.I... :. r '•t!"r. N,.. 'till
'r`I.(( ..��. �5;• - -- -ak �t'•• �'r:..^ --1:L..r,.-.i=�• 'e:l':..._.:.�.-.,:. .-- [•. :.:xu.'1L 4
1 N �:1, ,C:+r+t:j _ i;-,+-_, r?L. �':!-�J iTiy,l..w. .._:.._..., .m..\..a:,1-r.,_.•- -
,-..'f�. t'�.'i•i.'is`.a'- r'..r�,_ .c �• ::�?-;:: •:,�;�:r trt•�,....._....,•.- .. - J � •'�
-. iia :.. .. , .. ...,.tL .. :.....::: �.:--__.s:. .. -
�: F7- i'c.i..r .: :. .<tit._..�*L•s•i^. -. ;::-.1::'':::''
.,.._...._ri�.._...-..� ...-. 'r..._...::t,:. _ � a.Fr:, >�� it
s
.._� .•(?�:...�, t l.,arie_.:•...'•..r.•.�L.t. ..-}. }s,.•! -.•�.-..r,� _ -- _ ..r : - .:t:�.. i• Wiftl_
s • � 1..,��..r�i :n��h1Lrr:..-. ...Y.--• _ .:. _. _.: 1sr.�:....-^w..-n•,,`_:JJ'.zi.•L J:':�'�.�' .- _ --'�.'�- _ ..m. n'i-,3]��.'�lr.'�•zj(Z ,,:,•_'ir<:yiii -I a,LSa-:•, ,•� �,..• •n+ ,,. _ - .7v, :7_ C�z._,I.I •�•l•, _7L - L• .!. .�:-�.7"••tt"K -•t"i�F.� S=`� 1�. :,•.., .j�•r .. ......, r,_ _ •'::;!L:i:' '4.1. ..r' ...._ - - - rkP u•S'T �,• t3 �3�' A. 1:-',.:RINIP--,,li
't -i=i'a rq.'tl;Yr:�r„1: - �I._ a.Fl.+•t _ _. _. 1.� 1':.t•..:r] .:t:,:r;,.?J;-.iil:^rnZ- .]t�',If_ \t1 '�, .,Si..`.:�- L ;I'�.•!':1 AZ7k _ ,r.r-: E_+ Kim�¢i' I''��-L'��'4'fpJ•, �-uJ+ .9�.. -r3�i3.•....r�,,.�...,.��_r�r��i�I-t � rar. .�:-a .tet;_ .4r•: ,n I,.'.'-..,w,• _e�� r.cf.a 'CLrl, 4`.>2'- ':j_- ` a::rJ>=7r� -,:.[�1' f _ •}tom r� - :` i..r.,,` �.�ii.S rte= .i �! •C �5:-f'tr7ril ciK.L• •rr,'` o-iTy?F-: w+, : _.. :i!. 1 - -.i:•. F.- .'1't ,c� _;.-:a"' to <r•:_'•,, ! { :s•.t-1,.-1:tts j:.'hi ,rte.. {rv�. `'u' ^�•IL� '1 ,,3 µn Lr•<t'•'t:� �� !+;!_44.1
-.t!! '.i trti•.a'' •:4:' Ma-
•,,t�•• � ,.r- hL .<..Lv�.: :s:i+:&;•, !ii i �_.k�'1'�\�1 ..Ci-.r�_t." i. �p.�7 �R ���t5y-:�r,�t j'rsra*x:� i is 1 -':::W�.. r.;�rF- c ,i: .Si:'J ry, ��.. .j 2.•A 6• •C'ric��y, �...t i..-- +tea c:L ��' .� •!. " . _, Vr�'.•r
,,.� ,'�`';::��,••�:'�L,M; G`�.,� ..r.lt. _:'.•}�!?,.j.s`�q`�f .�r.�;'_•r]rr t•�Y•*•]: I• -..c'",-:r��]77 �it'�'1. �,C3:_€3s-�,.G. �•it•;., ->:• :" �bl.�_r-'_-+� •� ,.� 6 •�r,..r:i::c,... -a:�. ..7.r_ a t:r;�,T-..}i_,a:"':•��� 5 1 -o ,7lr...,tu-��4j - '�'+i'. a �,_•' .-�t..-Yra^ ,, �,�:i•z:i� '•[''�+r.�` �I r� _ 1: .;:!C.:• ,j R• r Cn4. 'Y�,�it_. 'l]'1�' .f': � �t1\ W ,it f,.•-+� �`] {-,y11-- c>N � ��,: r, � t•:.:_.:i, � .. .y�Y�•..rlft�S`T�,.rIr .vl n :.i- J .r.•s'+a/ _,,,,i';';:•: 7
:.st: i .C•l •-!=.: -�,4 %.. _ . 'Y::r' ;s:L'tL.`ir:?3•- .,1.,. =�.:n`:5^P5 n:• f i,r_ - i,- :��r_-_�t S - . F:P:..:_; i,-_.,a+'? i�•.a •`''f�f•1:_G: _ � -. - _ _-:I:..lsu,�r. . e<':n`�+r ,3.._ = T��'�+ '���e,'-y q.� � r rrJ-.y'ic]'�.: {�i ��".�'. � �J_-Pr:�I,;.' 't•�' Y'i•' s•ii- i, rI: {(� s'�*:.Fi•i-.�=fes:,^Ij«-='x-rT4�r' - 1 - �,_,-tf:f qr�?+s�ua��,�_ '1 ii.0 r'LX!r•�� r . ® {'�'�':i�':: :Ff, f• ,.x� - ''s:�;]i�'.�.�� i :eLr 3:�5 E•a _i t�... ,_„� 3, ;`_7t .J:.v. a-T�'�� `�.,I;r• i:.,•.s-�'�Sf^' - �..c...� .,.,-. ..{•_:•r! :- r 1 r..y•S'•„u+_z". P.a "�'^�_ ._ -�, hfir.' _.__rrj -- y �,r'�,;IY�t :y �i1.'� ��I.f`�.L;'i��r;:l,::' ,i asx`:r '• [ir tri:':r. - :,;t .:L- 't' «w,Jv "..:. 'l�'� ,i�_ .�o w 1_ r '} ii +�'tL�=_ _ 3..r. •sv••?i':i>; -,_{.S ,.G•: '• •s�.�si':,r` �F -'3.- 1`.,-rys�' . ra�1-`9'��' - _ �-" �r, �:_3f If '�,• {.Eti•�4 s:_t r+:�;t��y-
��y.•`-�� �:. -��•.T:'.:'l•'I:-Iran: 1. ;:.L�-:L.:_ �ai - �.�-r a^'-'z"a�:��t' r-'{{,='�}�, -Fl�P -_�•'{PI :L._ --� 6, 1� :T{` ..+,,� �f �'�1�:T-�� -:�- 1�cmt:a''i. r•L-. ,.ri. _ .:is: L: -»� 7 rr....:.?� - '-�I Ih�lr �, �,^ - ��tt-i S YT°^ r]� �'�=•.`���1:...-...-._ 'tv.:-tis _r• �7 rO er :� __,,..��:�:..{a:._ � �::�.1>*•''�' 1'] ;#Y'- ,-�? 4114-*44.1tA„'._:;---,f21,4_,q-. _;-..-7,,,,
' t' a.!1,. =r'�''i 1�- �r� � le:_Y;ci 4,_i if •r:' i:•-!. i 1. ■���aaa��,��` i. a•'�:T'-' r•'- ..cc t. Lr .i.. J-'•:, ,07,_'',.-r,„-..
- r - - J ,G 1 tY •lr,1 i-y:i:'•.' .• .};, +':,T:�i .:;���!3 � t�-•'.. Y. ,ii �'`�'3 :F _ .r_ts;,::. d]:4- St1i �- i � •r�.i.•�1- OgatiP!..::-
.
i v:5�'i4.1 kl_ •t'" I: i.'r• •!'I. i, •r,!.. ..:,,i, - �r.r- it - Y :{4r1-•.; "'1F,.� ;:,'4 A• a.. r1•t � : _ i r:' ''1. •�l:a�'-:';it-- :�i3':t M1•t P - t� ii;'1� - ;t: .V'::E.♦ ] •'�';it�':.� .'L .i- ]i •'T'l. ,-_{I1 .Z'L .:ci^' -t .t}.' :�.•,- .1+ .wr: !_" i-1 +-.:+r.. +sr•Flt' � (' 7Jam_ •fi::. �3. �R^. ..3-• �-',•T , Z. Ii.- '=.ti � "r'i uji'•' _•"1�_•. :a: .1L - - �ri].::r .,"� ..,rti::' ,e.. :..r, rIs s'� ,•y .� �� •., 121 -/4� - ,-S}•� �' .3 - _r. �;y�� 11. 1 ?.TJ• r4._- ."l-"..`.L '1' �.�•� 'f f -•y...... 1� 'i:', i7{: •T••-. a�l:.. trog4t, 1 •y'-.. -r'e : - .a^u:C- a.a:'� :t'ri,l:. '1"c, ''U �,:Jrs'•• '_:: Sc1:?{ r' 1.. ,�.� .,/'_ '.�L �'- !� '
-'�,` ..t!I, :G..rb ..-'T:: :�l ';:!_y "i4,--,,0-7,1't.: _. .'� •C-• L',1t - �•�• -SL-Y_ra:.. _ '.l: Y.l..r;.:.- 'r?.. ,t. ..y- _ ,.''Ca. 1• '7s'4r - .-^• '..y. :" - - -t ,L.7' o,^� .k ,r Ld r�;_ ,,rrt�e� _ ,IL .._l1: -';Y::a _ i'i:ll-=�^ 11 _�'il:,r: "'.J.,�t'.�. n�.'.•-s.:•r .ir�'�Fi7-�` �t'� -, .r•..�••�-•'"'• t.]. V•t:y. J. i.. .!•.•` �l� -�'-I r t-'t.T- .]•,�. �j � r .i D r.^J.11'- - r ••:i� 'r. :r{'• a • _-•:r't^. N `3a - - �-
0
'► ,.e•�:}i-.. � Wil•: c. ':c:l!_ 'L tii_.:::..: _ c� :,. - r- "!' .c �i�' .1• -M.
. .:s. -`k ,1r,. :.r� :�r.: _.,L.- ,.L•: •
_..n�:i`L'.:.` :nom" '?!:a.:y s _ - , 1 U' !.;•
r•, _
" ..�..- ir_.:r•r-th9 •at... :r:Yt.rI- r::,:a..:r •r.;.JT.. .t;.;. .}`,,1 'tom Xi +'! .. -. ..
r� •'J' .:,•-':': :.:�•. !.+`,;+_.<r• .,r;,i.(.: 7-�.rL•i',.. _.1 F:�:,...-.t-�a. �'�--,i)'��) , !}:rt :;c. _,�'-.% ..t _6 --i t,:�'i t ._ _ ,.-�!� ..::7+t+•r.�.••T.L...s'_._.....-_.t•f - - �F'iw ! v.:'.a • r't- ( -•.'r•�fi tti.7 �1-r}•'..y -S -!! rll-•r:•�,='J.`i', I. - nr!..,s.'� rrJ_.._. :t....__ � � �• V • � rel ,�a _ ''� I „•.� Diy ii_ .;7'-:' -J- r ^ i'�>' `.fi r •L♦ �'•3 {/-1.•.41,:.t�.''•.`� h r,L _-L - ,•+,-,i l Ir.'.f • Y•�r HI ••�ii�!?�.�� 15 Ir_ t �L iC � ..,, _ ��,.,;�9;-: L�`7�_R_+-�' -33C� _Ywt � ,r�-� L_s r �'��a T_..'ti:h 6r•n
+1 k
1t'1fj'- .. F' rr n*- .1lC _. ./+ '-.F..l+..,,,4, 4-:,.~ N_, 1rtr11' ` 'Fhf''t.,t,'.L=,4r • _rte.u'79r ._=, ori.r:t L.-':'1�..IT 1,,rr t� ii:.. t-TI' �-�'L. _�,+� ,1'�1r•.T��y,I r� mac, 'S" _ r "t Ft' i`..ai i� -` r� 'L,�. .S� Si 1.'.i`.If y�r �� <d'.j �r.y 3�1tty•1<-�_- .�'^K� Liiw" ,Lr��.'l�'fii°�_�t�1�e'z� •! ! _ � .-•�:L ei� ���••.:�.•ni' �:' •�sf_. ~Sr.'-.'Rt rrr�`tL.s rLi�` J 1.'.if r► r 1 �j9 ^lamK ,r1 J aJ:r L�t� Y�if �,' ��i� r , 9n'.•' rir='il+ ii:.,o'i FJ'F :� �L'I' S':,:.'ti 1" 4: r I I"�`.iJar 1��•hiaJ'}+r lia: g >ati' �'� •-.ailli•
j : !�F' ,n.. aE f7•aalf .� �.•�"•3e�LrLy�.�-i � R� _g,�r-?Jt=�-. r �. Wit,�1�t•. _•: ':],.,tij.d►,1;?Ll:t'."!.
.t.3 i�i:' �'' .T- !%1'��-ti•� tL?t.� r '�� •.,r--,..�t'P.Y''� � ^-.2Li'����: `'- -- � -��:F1`4'.,5.-,17::1
�1..n' ,}a �;>-� .•L:in t;zjt..
`;,��-. _ y Y• �.1 I• •f rTp i=,.,,r ?u' - 1';'!i '2r L�Y' o :_•2 r i' .ti�i.i,+.}•a.
. r" .� _ a f ,1,,•�„ o- �i t ;. qy I.r• St- wl- - t'L _t. j•
fa• 1.';',ti
� t!r c ^y 1� A L, t-t-FiT:. --t7 ' - ]-ti i :=7,'101","
�'�w.rs•:
... _ r '-'J_ t.i..l.-•J• s. _ t l! . .��t`T'fj:"'Z� p�il�'{.' y '., - , .z _ lei. S ,r].� �'-
f _ if's '7= r- Cj.� 4:,{7' f�� , i' !: ''`."` „�J-,i j` -- F--1taz 1 a ';
-_ iI'i:+•,'$--- �' c7 P ,"•,,i�,.r;n t- .-•j--Cr t
J - s° J -.i j;i: _ S� � 6•j -1'3 rr 4 j�:,,.ft•lirl�i"g_j`I,2y J:�' 4,:ii:•F i�7�r•ii iL? $C - .d 15;r7.1g4rfAM-•:iii:` _ ►_� } 11' t :.F4, r^��._+* .{ `e'�k-9L Vis!':, �+ ,J ilr -3..t.;.
.l,, :t .•:7.{�.! `r t S !t. .Lr4 1rw '_lr'1.t ` ,LJ� el• ::-.1., r.._ C '^ rte'Ji�:i` tr .:� eirs.3Y ,,,1 L ��,• t�,ei`tG"��7{.�i -Qlt� fre •y1ta:' .!�'• •L'; rf i�� :` •, - •'. `.}, tea} ,F`i•_I'.•j!�1 i-t[` k.- r>' 11;,'• 1• k��aa•� .,Iy ''��• ! 1 5 •� _ -- •.�. -�i�af•�!"i _Jf. -) S•" �,cy .''I, '_ rrj/
1-tr' + .---.. _J:.. t •-,'•`'.t•1 _I ;..` :,t: - Ya' �•a,:a y.��j}S t {�"E�P -1.-7 K:c`,a'.-,,,,.
i SJ' ,yr � - .�� '>:ts._.tt'.F-i ,...c.,41.-. [��.7i t��pq� �,-r_!�-s'r1i
1_ ':::i.1 T.. -F."njt i� _'�I i e �.4 , Ki,,::n _-a= - J,i i - _.„.. :-.7,
- L_i,'�..-
�r rr .F' . 'I. �i�is ,_r - eAr..
rx. w'e�'-:�`.�:;fjt\•, �A •SL -]f , =<F':-''� y _ ''3 fJ-F Utz T 1jf•!*'. _:'�'I •y,6* ,,��•a aI ✓iz,-„--ii;
L,• :1.:
ITrt1 - ,. gig frrlI,,,yr us_ �,0 a '•}'j1 �,i�C.Y•rll_s t` L. _ t t
''''t
�'y . - • ,i JrFi, :�}:� ,r 11 �•riL-� ._ r .t` :: t•.�'IF ..:.®� -.
J9t1 � ..ar t'~ � 7.", r•. �v. ice{ y. F--L C
, ,,,a,.-e_,...,-,-
If • :Ji' _ 1 L S '' .� .¢-._ ,r'{• � p'��:=
�. �T>t _ s !<T*i'-''''''':;-'
,. '�:,1�,=.-r► �h3, i>3 4" ait �+ r3;Y .A„,!.,. :';i 1 '�
i 1: �SJ..T'1 n. 1f• ,�-.. a: :! ti.= :....,..f.76,--;,-.
4':!1li '�::tt:
,-
_ sq F
r9 .i- _ r' t.''_ riy�+ _:• _� _ t�• K;� •LL'1 .•t:s r _ J't~ .x' t�„ �• �__ •r L:lE`•.!�e �i^ n.1 r!, _. _ 1 } J: r,.. �:� ..-..-- '=� .r• .rr✓- k, uaa'. -, ! :'�a•�=tl�a:� 4La ._C,]
• ... ,tea !pU•-� _... .._ , H- �`• _, - -i• -r,.:' tc li r ,'.:.'".°,_ .,W as• �_. i' r r r,'•r ":C ;I,T> .l:Ffl 1-...
�"- • '1:.-w
,+t!._l .-_,-7-"
_.._iY ,r; rv�-' -_ r:. r�. t, •1' -'' -t---- ,1- ] s'•i r.r st�'y •y ,i'•t,'.
I -" -t,-`r a i s:.. ,ir .t•. • T`•• t' `rs ' 2t��};� n L urti`.v' _ •S.
,.- 1Y :f' .i' /< �,r •
.s - -' .� _r Fr,rJ'r. _.F^e I Yin(•���i:n.�r '_,:.•'
<e _._._..__•�. .i-a h��.�a�-a c = +* .. .�r�• - vi ;Zu• R' riS` .% ] rLr-•aif,., •r t _.
' fi 1'.4,-;:„
-.•r.9- - r••- i -= y'- ': :J:.:;4 .ti!�_:t►•�r ''-rs'•tl{,fw�t .• ,�.�w"'�3
-�`_ >L ' .i'�• .:.-� �r'� �� :;r. i��" .i:' _•-7°t"� ut(ty'�, l. '=:C'�'"FJ���'rl+�'.L�,t^ri'��i?•s.-
�. C,.. fir- �-- -i.'. 1:•`•-• j�y �r .
_ � « 1 L .. r�j�„': �,, r.:T tv^ririrrl:t:.*'4,i5 iC_t.;B".�=::,:R�ro:�=•.
- � a\aY S.•F z r � �': �"'- ._ �r '..;$4,S55''
{+i�L. - �z_..S•o1:n«y x.-
i �-•1 tlt+Ct 1� � `.T r~ r' r.. �!. �;r �'- r�.r�..�ri:] .a 't4},.��,-y- Jiffi'_$a""��+•a''•:+- �� n•lyr'"L-
_'^ • .;,_ ,r: atl:- -----,,:i15;7::':.:!
•,` t;.. i,TES 72:'..,:• Y,jA��
'}.. _ • .;P'''''''
- F• `i ice-. ].'-te -' •'r7.7,sT - -p �t
r+•. .i J• '¢'_ r •/':., ! .`, F..i A:7, r ,t►•-C. ,r:.. i{' r fi.
•t'- _� .,,:w...,---
�.�'•r:`r.�.7 _-__ - Al �` '_ -� �'�- �t. �•7 5��;.: t,�:?r.a�;�`-�i f�• .%r' r40.11;111w-j!7:44f
�:,7 a ''•�_'.t.ta]�-'•' �,ir:
,t, ' •�' ,,,' •}' Ai',
Ir - ' .� �.-]_-_.'r .fit, .,-+!:•-•• "':i=! ?S.`.`.• � i�'� ' ..�t� I�jt_ ' 1,-' ,,--'----
.y- y- _f..
t=�, - i!_'"'-��` �. ''�i.�t�'. .:��:I _ ._ ait'_,
+s - _i -_ ,t .L.? 7_.']•i er'r., • .L.L,+- Ls •-'�I �� -tom! .t.` ._. ' '_ -�•'1 z+'.::} rv' L''.•ii•�.� ��._.�, '-Ii.= .otT
A.
- - !r4." r' vb.i•x^ S. ,1err. .:t•'! 1tn4 -i:: ti:',..k.',..ss.!•5. ,,,,.,:±:4 t;: r]S'•-1r tr
1� r, j 1 � 5 .u.! `:r t } •tray•-Yt�r*�t'�']!r'.:. i ,y*:£$�.:.`�F.:'.• ,�isi..^
_�• tat
�_ 1r� i 71° �. i• f ; 'ii"' ' r.:. } {+ ^ -; 7�`' ns�'r.c_7 :' .�1v$'.1E' rf, r:' r r s pi. � i trrt J ! • ,Y;«II
._.rte f✓ ��` • t-‘120:'
�: 1 ._ 1 ! •, - { 7 ssl'i ;]"t,i^ a, t '--''' C ,�. ' r+1f ,a I ' - - w ' •.:.i• n'*J•r-1: ! ',.;: yer'a�4- :tet tiLirl4r_ ry1 -A, r• aJ : r{yt1 _ _ .5 '� ..'F •., .t'1,,: F•' 'A >L -•L•'.
• •_♦. ^�'H Jr t _`CIM, '1 a , ,i .Y r.�} Y t.•_. '•I.]_ a.-!:ei :�;. -..r.iL i';L.;�: wrrN.4,47.:-..
t' y.r
..�, �;C 13407
..._ �1;:�,:5 .{' ,y1l� ^r+' � L ,z] ��'...str:•a.. ,Ji'K ]: 'i�. �!•V.J '<'�`:��: 'l..,;.-+� .I,•t• •Ir1 r -:,t`.�: •.st':;s•:�_:i-3•:3"M` •c�I.: :t ;1L t. 2r. ,�,,,r._�. t .�� r•, tip ,�•a-]c.rt .�Y ._• ` _ •�';,::r L,. s ..r:.._..,I��,, .!' � �: _t tail ��� �!' ,t r r'� ¢.. � L 4:,,"Iii:.�i f�',• ::l�.T i?:' ./Ftj:; -{ •.iS :.s e"� �"/ ..-_•" -.• ,+ LY• ac. .F.� r. �:• rtia
._....-.r._•�e:i_,:_C�i. 4!I�:t .._.�.�. ;'�`F tJ..,.. C..T +- 4,-,AKT-iry.1.75.-,-1....„13m.,,,..,:i,,
- N '.�.Lri.1' , i�fe: :C'-"'y✓'i•'s�E•.�KC:rr• 7;.!, :;.,,. i:. e-J' ,,,FiVSt�l�a.„:;.,syrc..r4•s:T..!••.i'r.::.t a. L::': -'r _•� � •'• :ta LN L t-]i"1.:a•:•:. i.�•ttlr..-_.�. 1 L j,-.•_.. .� w .7�Ji_� _ `�•!t _ 1 • 2 -r•7a_..71. t. r�Y rt �(r,•i'Slaan' �1 •_'y•-•.i . i ,�.'L" A'' ^'
r,... _ I�� ' - -- -'-_•:'J ::irr.11. _i.SM-N..t'i3 .::LT' i.!!'''��i'r, - '- _' 1'.P. ._5 -T7• r�'�'t'�r�.� .moi=��,i �L��'•;�5..- r 11-I� - . •. ' '" '- (-• k•tr-,.i'.. -LY1' •-+•`�•S,-T ,•`u31s. - - .T•:.... at. _ yF',' '•y ,: .11
}: frit�:- - s11. .,_. _kg....,':--'"..-
.--- :;P�:M.tr.y• �i.�,.��;..;;.:��•_ _Yi '•L'. .:r,-:.:s'Y.s.r,,,_ + -f •�._ .f;.
. ,. :t�F, L,•'-.J ?-.:.L:. -r'r s �s_'_,.:: aJi' ^ i. 3+ •F {.a,r _•'y.-�,�____
::.n_i,
ManningProp°II 1 , rty
i .,....:....
, •.-:,L,,:,.T.7.-#:•.,..:::',-,;:'!)-!.,.!•4:::.'„,:,..-.: -.!.,... ,.
— ,:-::-.:f.7•..:or,,,,,i.':•,.1,.„':!,t4:,-•-:.:,.-..::-.,.'. .::-:!,'--• :.:*:-;.,.-"
.----..-7..:iti.i.;11-::::',:kV ti....;t71'..,::::::::.,4-:•_;:i.i.,-Ii.::::.::::.;.i::::i.,:-.1,....: :::•y--... ::;:'• •1 .
.,, ,:i.T•.,-: l'41'..t.i1:1"i1,1211151.1tC4 .z117-1,:.:''.::: :' -';'"i:tilf.,7-
.• ,„ ...• 'fi,.iiii.;;Efki.. .„„,i, '''',7:-. ..,'-'ii ': -!t_--,'..,•-:7:;:'-..,: :*:,-'-:,::111.,-:::,•Z'...';i;11:',--:':-..::-::::::::::
...- , iii,''. -PJ,:', ik. .:..i..:-. .-;i:.-f;':;:!1:1:::',,i,'az:-a.
k_ 11 I : ',, -it,',P:'..-1 11-6'....g..,IFE , ': •.:.!'.':,'...';',-:.:::.,; ;Tik."-:.!;-c-,-4,Ff?t.',.',-i-iii` -4i--:
. ,
irla . mglia.;:. rIj ' - riti,.4. N:V.:n4;;,..7,,-;
A. 0, .-..... _. 111.... .. ,,,,,_ ..,fs.:„:1:;:.. .,,::,,,,,,_,i-zi--1,-.,— _. ..7...w:Fili:f:04..1.i: 4-::4*.:4*.f..-•,'AP,
.— .. . . ,...,.
I -' .--:-if -j:'. ''''.i ---• : i lb.,--':,:: - - .,-!:,....,.,-:7_7i-',7.-tIli_ T..,71iiikIV.T.Wi.Cli!Pig.ii.ai.,:.4."I,.i :::.:4?Att;*..4.,
- .: ,:- .... IiP:4;,11i i,'•-•4,ktr,..f..}47 tiki1
'1: .U.to:.:WV::: ::::41,-;1:::"?.?...-41
:','5;:.;10:47:::1)..--).:litsil:::7,--#1,Aiitp:.5„,1:::::.:
A41,11-ifirertifilitli".1.3„,..i itr,..:,14,4, i. ...,...;,,r...11.. ,,0,...4i_:i77_,i.,,-;.-,
1..s.t.sok go,51,:i,taiiiii-• .4:.,:.4./T44•0,z-git t:1,..'.:::5,.,:,-"i€z,,:iii.4.1j,;,.-4y4,1•Ii.",...'4. :y1...
Iv D
.5titaki::,,q..miltlItc: 1 ,i -!...krifaliti,...:!•i'.•;;,.13.-, 14-?1:N;.1":tt.--it%liIi:;,:iTtl,tWifY4.1-:::.i,..rnIglIP.Frii.r-'-,,,4:
.,*-04:awigks,--,,r,kt-ligtp::qh-,),. .. ,-latligth-,10,-,-, ti,i-T,::44vitu,i-,1..i::-,zto.z.s-,:.1-,,
,,--..,L,7-.,,, ‘,... -f:....-fyi.-A1-if,a, .,-,-itiicalig,it.t.,,,-T.i..!..::,:ugct.,;%,:t .,-4-,?,.t.ii,-,.? ,,y...,:,1,,,,,i,F?:: ::,,,,,f,-;:s40,7,,,viy.,,.
kiT,43--t1--.;r4stP2n-;13 .-:.,:fq-i_,,,F,.-t*Azi-,5,14% 0.6.3...i.kleig. ,:.i-iii;Niti-§;i5--F.:.0.1trA-Tfit-itgqii . ,a, 4.,..i.a.i,,, ,,,...44:z.•;.17. .t..,,,:qt:;.:`iks-i', (-Awai,ttri-,,A:w.,:-.., i-u-wag lisliA--ms-7.
Atft--4-i-feig•i5A44,41 -i4 -giffv;&,.-g_ituilmfrfgc:41t.,,w,Kciiiitia'At ,,-.• •-,4'.. 4,.v..:::i_t;ikixtigg:;etgt4z.tq,af-§ztqg: ilago!TA ya 4,,,-,•41., 's.
• ,*itagviik-:- ii: litati*:.::,!..L.Fis5:101-2,,,A;11-,z,:,.-•.;.ri7- pr-I-it-,1,* aife..i,:,..,...it . ; 4.1ramtic:.!-4
4 ,..:, ,,11,;-,,,p.:,.,:ir:f:--trog-k•:,421.-:. ,-.4.0.4!):i.q.gtatAisr&.:;. ,,,t-4.--0,B7.449:11.,
4
. .o.,...„4 . . ..t._;,:,„..47„. .....70:%.,,,e4.4.1„,..:,: .8.,44,,,...1:,.,,i44:,:„...sx„, ., ;,„,„:.,
w''.... •I:q. -i_gitift.tilliI-1...tie.:--rk:',..r:'::'L. :•-t.a.-'--..
.-...,--,-------'- ...„ ,it,;-1.1:-PitAV:i•';',',i:-.•:•,'klfh`s.;.4.1 .P.t.:**ir,r '''.-..-..,---;4,..,,f-.r,:.,',74.2:4,•:14bit!,!it4.•€,,-•-iii'if('-,''•
..,f7:7-',:g5ti;:,- ..,-.F.:',';',i-•:"-it.:4;i* - -,,,t.:•%•,-...--,.--i,...fi,,t21„, ..,..
,:.:-; .4...i'A:Ii;:Allf.11FP:Ti:D.'''.::',Y2--::P';': -. ,
i'keil.7,5.4VaiTi.,...16..,....4'.. ":',:t_'...,4*;,..!'•Vin'..L...ilirtr•I`,
t W11:ii.':::::::2,1-.;: .:-?.-:1•.;:::,"i AffriFIE.',2-'''''.--.. ...„-„.,if . .., ,'. ..
•E'",:'.P...: 71..';':'-:!':-...:,::te•-.,,V4_,.:„.•:'''''''-i*,A,.6. 7-';..-::'''' ,1%Ilip..+,.,,,,...f.,;..';'';`• ..-it.i::' kirt.S,,iii,i:',W..k4,..
,-„,..,..;...i.,,,,4W-0'-':::ti,-.,::--,-...:,....:-.,:..
.-_-, *....,,,:ii,-.4.t.:,.:,i. ,
' , •-7:-.:`••'.-.-'47''Wlil'i
, •:- Irl• ,'=...,' ti
'::1:5;•,--; ..t.4.;.;'''':.;:':'-'5.Iir,r-T:4,7*.::::',`-:'.‘- -.— ;.:;t,,,-,ti"-- iii,•-'3';',i',J,A*44"
414.,..!, ::--.. ,1=-0,qi-',47.-1-t-,.•%F tr';.,•r-,2.,,t t.I"'vie&.,0_04
--ir.g.:L•tqlik:i44,itriV5-,:,rt:. ... ..,:,-iwir.,Ttitte: ':'*E,.:;5.-'4:-_*::2-7;i2-7,---..•.:::i-. 7.,:-.:-.-Ir''''..,-,,,:,-..1 1.-:•1 lg.'kti'42F.-A-414.
.:AftAA'A It.rf:4-',V4ittI'',kt!":....q,:.'iiiit..,r:fe'. 3,4742ItSR,.• ..-:-.:_-_- ',-,•-•:'.7-4.-$-Ti_•4-4,i'...,?..7t.4.',.,.._:iil•.,:#,tt!,..1-',2,
,..., ,-,.,,...„)".,41,,,--,...,,,,,,,,.:..f.,:i!,,,,,,,-,..,-7-2,..:,.:-.-.47.'....iNi.,A.'1...fr:Fi'fA:--4',...,'....4: ',' '' ''''. . ,• -, ,i.,-,.4,1C-1,-VAL. ',. .'"----.71,;Sri. •..-1_,.:,---,.:..,1.-:,-;V,"•-.CI, ,,,,,4-'-,,-V.,-,-,..'"
P-1_1 1,,j1".:1**,1 til.i. .-:i i.Z. ;•-'' -.'•I':-#•...=.--.'-7:0;.Ft.1 4:4-.I:I:!:''t 4,rii iN": li.';!.;'i-.i KA I -2,1: i.:4V-b.":"T`----,..7,...S.”"atN"'t15-:%'•'7.,:..::;;-:;:::.,r 44P Atirk;472...-P.
- . ti.s.ji.0-,...-. .-........,-,-.krio.z;..;.',.
,. ,., ._,,,a_,,T.,.4t AtA.,,,:::„,4,7„il..w..,i..,.,‘i 7::i.,;.•,1,...,7,.,e,ti,,,,ti,.,,...;,.„-,41i,i,•,.
, :,,:- 1.v-.,-i'- • -,..,,,,tor-,,, ,,F,,;„•*,:r.,,:t,.,.. 4,,..-.,-„,3,27.,:,:,..,40-,.!:,.,,•,:ti:
.,.„:„„, ,:„ ....„„,,,,..,,,,,,...:.
, _. ,•:,.,:_.;,... :„.,,, ,....,,,v„,„:„.,.:„..„:„,„,,,,,:,,„:„„i„..„,•,:,,,,••-i,,,,,_,,-,,,,„,„,,„,,.,,,,,,,, ,.._
:, •,....,,,.,,r,,,.._,,, .,,_.,_,,„...::„,„.„,_4,,t.--p•,,i, 1, ,.
'-.-74-71K,•=... :,-,-N-'77 .,...3. .,-.-.-1„...,,,,,, -- .-4,r',..A k
..ir:.,„..01-k.,...:.--*-,...;t 11: 1111P-.71'4•Y-'.'44Yicat-
.4.-Iffitri ..t:',.. t'iiit•Iti-Wii*--A.---ighpli-S4-:` -':......:'4
'.r,-ii zFr7:,- .774:.-Xi....4'i:M4K,P7:,•,:',?....4... .itT;71:F:43(0.;:1•44-ZtAN-•!:-Iiii*.%-:9.fiATi.;•,5446-113: - "-'-'1'7-cf--gii.4.-1V MA*E-*-r4-31(RO:"'?.4 g'CA-:!efit\S'tfift
I-4.-14- 1114.. -"---..71,.....,::: ;1.:4:4t.se.i'l;',,.:3;,..;Y:Wti":77-4:_t#tt:41-114:a&tIt''''" ''''..''''' •-., - ,':1.-;', 4,,. tits:atr-'--te'41-z:,- -'-'1;',""-W,404,'Y...E,--..44E-g•—-.4
- , .-,:,,, -_,..-'..,1,4*-,i,..4-ralt4ev-5_,14.-IgtOilk,,,,It-!7
/ •,'''' ,#'4 1-wtif.,-*-..e4T'Ir. mixt_Fttir..-.4-44,- ..,_.. t::,ki 7744
..4Fi I- ,.-:" .'' -.0...'•r*-4.-t:..-„--4,rV4-‘,45,49';.*r-Tio.----•' ..---' 4-'" ,,..,er :'4'74---;.:: J5 i.1-7,1,-
.4:
op: ,, ...,, .1,:9,1*? ,'.1'.-'lug,t Igf 15-,.-••:' -,i,
,,,,- ., 4.14,14,
---.v, ,,,,, ,,, ..,-, / ...e.m:
:::i ,'' _ -- .,. ''1,. .--c,,,,,.'.,,,/: mr-'..we- ,s,'' ,,--,'• ,-,' .i. .k,.--, -;,„=„ 4-..,,,,,4c ..," ,.--f .""
.c, ,•,• .- .../-4,11' ,r4t-r ,,,' ,- ;- ,-,4-': iii- ti-,,,, ril-zt,':,;:i;:,_7_," „ir
.. ..is.7„,- „,:,.., ,.- / .,,,,„ ..L g,71E„,.,:w4,,,.:44,,.,r,,,,,,,,,,,,_,.:tim„,,..„,-t.,-_- - ,,,I7i
,a1[1:Y'' ,s, -'' .'' ., .,,,.';' ',IF1:441;1111;1;;.hg4fittitkit
I
4-tti, ,,,,- - .., ..„-- ,f•WtY•ilifit.!
.,.7. t. ..-,•41,-F---t:;....,7,,J.
e„,:x.,.., ,... , ...... ..,,.. .,:- ' - .... ,__ ,...r..., ir• .e.r- .r., ,,, 4, .„.,,,,, .al....,..:14:14±,4125,,,3::..4,.i::w•..,1-',17:4 re-;,:-,-.;'.1.0 1.1::k,..!
it I:'• 7 l'f.sr''.1 ,•.': 1.--- ,.1._ •-.,' :.,.' . /_ ' _,4:-'' l'g. _,,E4' .,-g-3-' ./ 4-'.'.!'. :ii*MiAlaik.f-7.:6C A4$4.1,_._.::At.,24-frt:i0
1
•.4,-- - tel. ,
,, ,,, ." ,,,,, ,,,,,". _,,' -ti:V.,',::-W:L.:;.4, 42p12t,S',.'lli':$,'N'''''..'. •r .4'4
1‘tti
,'- .e.f. er ,,,- i, ,_.,'• ,4,-iiiiii4-7t;:ircii-TAki-f-P,i 4::+.4:t.Pan. — f At..i:;i.,..,
• .-.I,.'' ...--..-N g, F-E2:--,„,---4,4. ---• .,,' ''' --- ,--- ,,-r• . ,,,,,' ,,,,f _,,,e „-,'. ,,, ..,-* .--ti-noi-Viittlat,b;:,,ritif,t,itigifz! itig.,,fi-tf.:
7'....:1 ,-.''' 1-. , 't4,:aV r'-' .-.?' , -.''' ,e'r ? : •i -.---i le:-dal& . --• '''.''. 'e' 1 I'1"'' W.11'5:"1!1::1"rk'i.°I:14-'-k:17'.'L.4-' -'''. ''''7ir.'''
1
-"i''i .-'!. . .fr ICA%- , • 41 ,•'''. ..,:::." ,.''...•- •--''' ., I i ...;4'. ... i IV", •.'-e . ,-.e. ._.1, ,,::A1*kk;*aifki:41'It 4.:IA*-''':''''"."L''''.:7';
c.„4-A,t---;,-----_/'-. •* ,, . .--,--, ,‘,.%,.. i ir- , . r , -- ,.-' ii,.,-------,.(' ,t,.,,-zett... ..,";:iii. .,_- _--.77,f---_,:s- : -r_pr.-rs,..,:
' -•"' - .ii,:•itI---,,' ---- f:reit" ''''r ... :r4 t 4.T Jr . . , ,,,,---, -.,- , ,- , _...-_,,,,,...eft,,,ia, $.,,,,,- ,-__.,
i
, ,,,,N.,tig, . • • __, 1.1%, .1.,1.1 At ,,,,:' 1 • '7 ' i.T A'-'''''''.''-'.' ' ' '-
'11 '1.''1 '- If ----,-..";-433' - ---I "ii.--f-,*,-P'V-- T 7-* 1- -2:. _if 154R947:.:,..:-;'•'ert..,':-A,.;c.,41-t!:ffkry,,:f.:C- .4---i'•••-, ' -
I ::_•::- . :Iti 1 •...r"-- 0 •:.--q.- 44* ,,,, ' ! .-"-:,...} ,,,,,,e1.-7,5w,,, ,,--. 1ht',447,_:)-Jt,..Y...1,7'-''"".'' '.',,s-C'ff i_,..: ..-,;.".., Itae#:- :?'--zgA. -----ii-----,:,:5-7.,,.--.411:''''''-a-tz:ti:\-,..*7.!..,12,'ic,..q:';', ...!_:1-,:.:'''''''' •.-,::.,-.:•_:ii•,.,5.:,_,,,„_,,,,-.-4•-..f::-.,.,,ii!'---'• -,4
1
ii
r i-A /
'I 1 v
- Dro f-J c-- -I)
vp-11 i
B _ „ , _ .
Exhibit
. ..... � -�� .F�• _ _:i,'_„rrs'.ti,.j�j{s{-.. ^.�-r:w+�^�.t:•f,•.`:':•;..:r;r ;i. F•«.._if' '•L st_ �itSp iLt'_-su,. a.e :.-..::1• s. s .
....';:.-":::::: .:.
7.
•
k.
,,,,
C :!is _ }•• firiV:::. . i t ::.f7".-..,•,''.1t,-...:„F:•::::::
k' r ryt .S'_ J..
1 - ri ti r.it LL ii - tir tL `
,,,„„.,
�•rYt._1• �. plai
r+ y r' :sr'�•. _ ...,71.,,,,:::..,.,......,,„.1
i •.7•'.... r"• •
4i,: .
i:' J}4 Vm'
_ r .3,.. -... ,� `•.�:,a •.0{Ei,l -:ai•:i:r_` .r..'.,;d:-::�.::-'... 0,'144„.
€j J l•' s'4 u.....-._..::1:�• 7-2-7..-,:;-,..,„,,,,,,,,,,,:#:
_rr:...r__I..rit•-.-..l.-...._e" ::.it'•:!" ! ,r
T - • t: L _ r• _-rFi - '!YLs*.t.i1:-1n - tL: �:J: 'r-::.: - :ii.'t• S' �:J{i.. f.
_ t. .-SKr. iJ-`. „,,.:..... - •'.' yt.�...,r - •,L�
1 4:- _••' 1•r • :_:r'1 i �_. »S }t':i--�iwiLt'Q!?'3t.'3•r..,+._.:sr{i.._. ;.-: ..,M,•.• c_._. '::•�:' .:..: _::.:`- }::-,:: _
� -t. a'7..:`
J' .t 1 i � • n n.'-.Jt.rar.r�ye-:�•L:frJyM_._.r_..--':--7.-..--,,-_;:-.74-,;
.•_...:....•..-_.._•�:r�..-:�,+::..'-'.-]-��+'.rnr"t_<."'I.L�:::.-4ft,. Yl+.s.-.:>--.�_,,z‘- t.....:.:,-7,,,,,,..-..-:.,5=:41;,..,
't •4 L� i'1 i::+: :...i,."...„.:
�, �Y +t� -
' ..:Fi^r F>_ u° '!: ._'•Y'�,A:>+;:,..Lriy.-^^.sst.{_�,.�,."��•�w _• �_ � •."•Tf'ii�.'trr:s.wJ.::r.�'��= ;+eii"srC+:•ii - :.A'C lQ!<+
• •- --._S ,- - �uw. _ .t�'�iU---.:E4,1.: -:;:••,;, :1Si.•.o- r,- .:.'-!5 i r;7•�.i_._1�r:[• _ _ .f!:::-7.;
sp+_.• _ •
1-:„.7:7-6:7a4.V4044*Fleilt-41%tattIOTRAlikeit:*
��- Ii�cRi :hi►r��as-'mac -.-..-a..0 ��_ r ,:nr 7.�`!s._ �};r-. .. _ __ __ a..•�.it�:`. ^•+.u:•�r�o•r:",' -
;,•" es�•„. a"' +•_ r _ .fiti,a�4„.:F;•:4 t,r •:f;•_ .L•" _ - -.•:,+ •:.i• _••<p,. Ir '1'r 4 :t_ -_y•�� N,.rr .a...-.- (.-.. - •Fi_" - - •i ��f`sl. r!s. .s_ •IAs'^,c).t T' r.r:t•�u•. _1..d� .:�• -1 - � -t "s: yr•1•'• uf ••R'� air- •':{ R•.J „ • . :P+Y - -'{:� ..t •'•}- :,.: _ x.I s :�7--'+1'••- •3J' j--. tti_{- '14:11,10E40104
•�P•:�,r�•r•:•_,i, 1- .i`�ti+f•'�•' ='j• ''•J �.� { .1! '•ra.� �-:•i;r) Iti.. ��i.•s. ::d' S..s'� •L.•iisr'.r• .
_ ..�•.!).`.. .,r�:. .s J::•r..4i 'i:t'' .T .• , t_+i '.t {' _ ., W�..- ., ;_ .i•
�i;cr S c-s�a: : 1 a'rl •J.. i.: ,'L.•j•_ .'F• •:r i J••'�t .'
.fix: .{c:=- w i==,: .!. +t u s. ''
- .o..:- t .t .::rr.
_a. ,f�:�=' H•s .I•n.� !�[ .tr'S J- •t_^. ".r �ir`' ,'w•=- 'P„ '"i~~ - .S -!•" •
•i.' of •rt. ir.1•L - f+.� rte ,rr•• .�Y:•: ..Y �S.. 4••.ii'
r Lt. 1 ..J 1-�".i i r.3 .�:: r - ...•� i :ice":. .a!:¢t.
I 1'i- - -'i• l.• ..r =J''_i-'' ••t• ]_ .r� t': .0�::l:° .:C.F
t°fl a->r � ..a•4... .L +�. -S •+<. .��r-:.:. A_L. :•i-. 1:i.,17
•:..
__J! --•T� �� e '-7: ••��C•r ^27 •":i::i �- -:-:.!4'rt C'I .� ,:L S_:-A'tip :.: .. c. 'S'S'
_-L-. A_ 't.:j'a::k.1 L Zi,�c `_'1• i.i'•.dlis..c : _ - '�',,E'.a • .s `,i�».f.'t: ?. .I!'._•_` _ :r' J
-r"7 }• .�. �r�•.:[. -'!l.i.� S. - "R.r.tAt%I'- -.3``•'' •.t'EK= f• �'.,.:: _ .t;, -{' ,
.1i:- 'a,':wr..• r cl' :y '}'7r. .ai..•I-- ) - •� r4::�[.c.. /P..t`' •+iT.:• .:I:�..�., i:_-i'. •t.,• � � ��
.r' �•'1�:V�r1 a' -v-.4::rS•yt�i" .a! -J'tr's. - rr �+� .3 i.stri.' - ...1. ..r:." ]: .I::
t.t: - I - „y'_(< ,si.gi,• r:: ./r:,r4.. i- `:i ► A>:••.x:tAi;_
':AJ •-T f l \ A•t > t•• .ii Nr r'L: Y �'':�•^'� _
$ 1 r
I:: KT i •'!'•• .4..rl 'T �. ir! •,ri'- b,.Ir.S. ,`;:A - ,AA q- •�
�,.ys.r1 =.1�.. '^"rrte�•�t•G. �9haai' r.r..r 4., .rF::..,.. '!i a'� L�, .r.. .�Ei .}:�: 'T!i• .-r" s: 'sC=...•:
•%_ ♦.•.��d .? r. I.L• •.�-t t ..1.- :,-5-�..r.�' .:t. -:iss 't�.:' �• r x
{, Z.'�L`?••a�:l• �t "-�y;1 "1...?�:7s-;;�'^ v-•'��' •-T_3. e :�!'ry - tt. �'i?!.i_-.:'. .:•i:�" -
IrZi•=.L.. n•:ar-r•�•w+.•ti•4' _+.. 1•t.. - s_.7,.1a 1 is t,.::• .'.3-' j
r,-,Ii.
�' .t�-• 7. _.P y ..] f.- l _ .tl:.S�z.....r :4. _rS.•-'t.: ' _.l:'•". -�-9._r._ 'R:: ••r.»�r1r..
•t`•., tr' •
-.:t}t'�'.M... i•r:i r..r_�,�J{'n1 4:,. r .r q...t,t:t_.1rrG'.�T{' ���. _i•''.r._ ..1.` ...� L:�,_r ..�,.... ..i•�F•r� '-f+., ••J.rL-tt+•.. •� �:••..
.. .L't'„'-• ,1..._.z 1•� -�..r ti. .1a..r'_7 (-...,.,•i:•t s.. n�i__ Y:.f^.�` .•s: •'•s.4: `I.1•tl�: �iJ:--e v: .}:i:.t ;:r,! i- }sC.:, ••fr..xA .L:.�' F'
_.L•::.°7.�::i�r :r�.^`r.-s+-••_ ' -•7;+..Ir�J'":J.'!' _.7. •,1:. -•S:a:•:_.a r..si-.fl�i �C.•r�C_Z -•�• -•ai.;`:i,J- :r.�•l:' ``:ir.:F.�fi.,�.c;i'.' ..s '..'.r:..�.�
. 'StnT.•_ 4r. �:t � - «I•C!r• I�:Sr�a• •{ -d,..,. 1 c..-_ :�':_W� �.?;s:1-�.+:..^ '.t''1....:. s ..I.'. :�i.•ZeJ i•-'
's_W3`« _•a-.tib: :.i�Sn_�"_,r••.�i +1�T, t_. _ •;r,:.!•r•: iL•� - - _�.'T:;i ,;}� :, ..N,U.�. .N• :i:' •.i;'=t+! '� r•
•J��• -r: ..! is�•i-s: -�•�pp�r? :�•.• .J_� .1.rw .•a �rSl .3 J:..t .:T121-�.- �•d••e�'rF•.::_s:. .:w :ir' .s.y_. .}is_...�,,r.:..r•�t• .:..,J„�y: -�.-[-r..�tliC. _•'�� YJ�.71'y,}� ..!:r _ -cJ t �! (:-', .,.i+ r - :! n�. :..+._ .,_�•..�- t._.•.- ,i-.. -._. _•:i:,.t• ,_ .-'tll+.•1•,�:.::•:I`;'..[..: •.•�=���/' ;v iY'�sA.., r s•-.. a•.i- 1E1!'.. �_:. i;i':_'.t: •.!_d.-•••'�.- 'T•r i a-i-.T. .,/'C •Lr:- .at.4..�,''�. - rsi.+�:J• ��)) 1.1' ..s, !.. - :.i.'"!'T •::ti:i ,..T'=r'•_ •!1._f•.'t a-.'3., • :.ir• :{'•t f t-_ T:: ..♦ 'tt^•= T t r .�-,•L: •L •'t '!1.t..1.: � .J. .4C 2% rt � rs� ji:%•ti_'' l _1•' ..'I;:;'�'e 1i • t-•: -1�;,: :a: i•'� f•..•.S R:ilyA•. rJ: il. �..:' •.t✓' .`.r. rr+1•<:'a+:':L`s%::C .rr. ?re -#iil. .#'fi:-£. 47 - V. 'T,,.:L:�;•t ';� '.r' •:1'•: N: .S. t 5r- .'s:'f''1 - ~:fr�� _ ':r:r....•x•: -�f'�1Lt::_ �-3. •.+: 'i1'��• .-.•..ate 1i'•�+.: r _ :.7:. sg=•�s- �v.:•i;:'.s.!eir. r .d: .t\s:. .�'u'- nf::' �t_s.:i•- _ ./�•_J .c. _''ii,`7 t:i ::_. :S:,•i,. ..t:•.. �
' ;!:
_,.^ ! Y- TJlr:i�l d •.ac r +,.1.}._ ). a •r: - o..rJto.u::£. �c.;3.=- .�. .=,2 s'-,i:: ,,-j� :r', :_�:•':•T.i% __ f•...u. ':ice a'r-•'3± _.J' L"3 -i;`. - .•_'i' !:..�v'=J:.T4 •' r.•'.t:• :i:.:i-t .�. ;,. >,'1k'rla •.�. i�l: �.�r _'1...,.� _ .f: .1 4•' •'f,. .,,,� ++t� :iyt r-' •-i .i r {i;:u•. . _ :r+!{Srt .`..t^?T=� ••ci M1�•c+ :1•:.!1r}.,.rJ •a-� :'i' _: �' :�1':- 1;1 _ 'sv` I ` .• It-if'•:�:' 'F'-:• t!-��• - ci.:-r-rj`..y- - ', 9.�. rJ i -`r +- +i'°e..1�~-::o �y7.>t•�4" "�.1.. r^I- .�• �-fmportant1 e:._ .��� . :�.
Tt --:'i1_•s'4•' .f.?.. ;.!- � ^�f tom,:'f,.c.1- _ is"I t:-•:.. E~�.':Y..... _ - •:..• '{�;• - _ :'t:'i: t.r.. !
.�. 4.�',ti.•.ti•:.l:.�^:`"'z�j{-{. i `""_T r •,rl ,' i�.:%t sa •:h..•Y`cL�r j.s"• .✓ri_..,iaSL Al' A� ,.?s_.Y,ijr,..::r_';a:-'.`_: •i•'-•'•�`F•-^•*' .}s_ '"}':s .+.._.I':'-. - •
_4 ta�_ p!.` .r-T4_•i}:.;..:I::T1 : :i•.T ':.�a a• ,A'? r'r: „i.t:_rc:t' ..`t.-.,., t. ^sL'`s:' L •`i - �L•Y.• � •
i
1�1f=. •,I`'_ [_C{.-... , ' :ti 5•t..r :5:�:' n-i+�.!`r-�a.�..:..•y.-1:. `:iS� .�:!�t• :�s:�- :•I:'•s.�i=_i; j"
•:t.
r` i{i�-rr I•�:✓'.t1�,�i:•I%�'t:.if _ t 'fir• �•;.�T�•��l:l': .rl�w�•L:hf,'.'�. �:J: Y .__r"l•' �r i'. ��i•..�!"4 :t.r:i.�:• :Yi .•,. �::t„'. � :/+w
L.�Z•.. .•f��s ..a. / _ - i' !•t-1 i-,., .'i T'��'/,,.a�r�t,.- _ s�•F�`t` �t ..E.-y_ tS,'i .._ih �.Yt :.c',::'•:�n,.;3,. .ti:a •.
sr.•,-r:lty .:'�=�_�•- Ti= .'Kf ' �is JEj .r'", S .1: - '•+`i.i,:1s r'"'r•:1•,a_ •7';••siP,.�.-.i.•v.. 7:, a:.'1! .::.Z. � .;.
t -!' '� t: � :.:r.: - �F�.t..,. .:_ ,�...:•' _ .j-r„ _.�}�.I+a;RiarzanAreas
'r'yl. •,;F'' • y..: ;r. cI:}t'„�.a. � s
j `�'. '/t.•/... -41 '! ::J '�C�:•t-r.: - cj. �fi •.-.-iv.f :t.e S,y� -:�, .L.:•1.+.^:.::F:'.:li.r. :.'
•t:I.. i?:!"s•:: r...c-�J1i��r .•c•.. . : i!. ta)..Cr. ri; .•I:: �:•.,F` ['r 3:'.�:F'. !
.. i. t•i .:•rit:.} ,LC. r •Jr.
niliraltifiegg.g.WEitg-itkrtgifgif-FV;Autr:. '"""'":"-..
'i •'"-F' .T: .+ __�..'irs�•:l F: ::7a 'S'-.: r_'•, - !. � e,j,::t^»tip J' _ •ty''' �� j���,,, -r,,, ..r.'::s' �' ,'.jFJ it 3 'r. fJIrl.• �\ _r•„ t'L -•11-� - •''? Y:•'•rn ,.:ti . .� 'WYJ A'i�rii f. .-]-•T:- J. _ tA.:i� .:x":" t..1. n_R .'-il. s'. i. :iii~� .lis ei _r':'..•t• ..� •rte:r a• -;y y a LJ9l��ti_ .,ci• t: •:Is:: •iT :/:• :ri'• _,r:• _ 3 ,.,. c:..; :�.r-• .1 i•- - -J'.;% r#'•�u%w" ^'' '-Jy- .. t.: :r':. p�n .fi••.ii :•r .. �, :i; l•' - w. J'- -s���rtrf.•Ar•� J= -
f it �i r _r ,fir...;.. .�i. ..i
:;. :t r{
( �SI 'Y _l. �• 1. t••-.�, .:s: •t tf.' ��• 1 hill110%
_ r:i. .�. '•i?' •�Y,..',••• :it
tt nr •r 'i'
I• ...\ fr J'. w-'7_1:41,11.Ali'i�•�! • :•%':.�7.•§.:�:'. .Sr`:... is t'::S:i�9'.. t'~. • � ®!•-.+..r•..--I�i.:t►sSr�:. P #� t t• Ss-. r:r:•. :1:,rir..i.. :�tj.��' r.•"A� t.
s•'.Y:;icr."n".s'+h,•. tii.';:4"-MV..
.'.t{,.... ....lsa. -r Li. •,jc.._ c;/�' �y -^�_,;'�."Lc.�• .:'."F•r�ah:.'..F•,t...qtr..r•.. _i.•r.ura���• .:•��"7 _+4 ,....-
-,,,F....,.-7
r• .Jrrr._ C.: ut ?'.:T t =: fr::•,]?• c -
_ ,L,,,,,,- � - �� .l � i n.. L! , � "'la{•.�!I e:s•t.'ir4rk:ii. ti^?:'.:1... � �.1.
• :w._c �^I••-'1 _� ! �„ 1 � � f jry,',r 3•Ft 7tl�: "•�F_, i :F?Ft*�•' !- �•`•�
1 1; - ^ - _ „i,''l: , .T�, XG� •. -t t. t ,.t: `�••',:.Mf5Y-rt:Cif*.cf
L-�I_T�.';.•.,. {I....' t�:{•s.rlrrs,.J+.•raa. ,rJ :.Y;;:F ?• _-A;r.�q :.ici- s',t F!':rr,•.F- ui-rs:.':-7:.!- � a+t -•f'i,:l:..i ® ®1:14i
'se:':'tl,�:� r.'! g? s^•:- .Ft �.l=i:ti';P u;: r. utt .ii•,J. _`l:'_-.-.•::t'.� �.t.t Sty_t.+ -••t':.:da'�"t:: - .:t.:"'_c7 L' 'N... �1{-� .,' y ••f{!.:i�i4. .L,';s .s�F...'i} :.a.•:•:r, �:►r1 s ,1,I � �`,Y L t__ .x:..,�: -... ', r• t.. F- . T-:;•t Yi:'tl` 'f1. -.r`.�-h: '1^It:•�t-: . � s...:r�•::.t•..-: -;. �-h i',]•.5+:••,'b,. f.;.':.:':;.=:.� ,Y':...:_ ..lr i�• -��:' ,'-:r:jd'• � ,;�� .T:: ti:!'F: _.,� �.Y),.A.,,.._' � ��i /�1:tf-i'' .rtsar}... - ---5s+ a'r � ',7, '�:1�'t .::�.'':..::,l��`1lr�r ,r.�:.:d..••_ :•r+:•c.:• lirs"r.:,a _.,•Y1�_ :f� 1. 4: ..,-Y,a �.,' ''••:. •.••u:,.<•i„'� ,r:. ?: . �•ti� s:,j..�s. Fr ",J s _ :°t-i: -:,� •x7. 1. - .. r_-:a::.-�.. �r ,u.C:;.ir%:moi .. ..ar•,i.i• a. it ,�• .k: ,Tr,:.-.!':_ :.Rr-�.,1 �`C :3�:irr :t}} 7 ..r i '}� •s., .� �
it it C.: ..T:•- 1- :'.r -- '-'.:7:2::;.4:.41 ,..1:;::.
r; u•.. 5 i _ hlula:.::i".I_ _:.i;�i_.0 j�•• Ct--• - `£�7.:. :--,;>:: ••1-i ' r
tl'"•!{1- :r. L�' Sry } ':s..?T- L:'F - .•. :..t• -.;.i•;i: Ar_i '7L i -:•i:':C,^. s y %.,-,. S•a-•jr
L3 ,!'- r_i:',�: t. �'[_:. i!'lLtr' .Ii. F.^efA;`i T'�E;T ..a::.e<•-.'. w ::ate•-.p: r.s`'•'1' '%f;
_.- - ., - t' r`r - tit ':L'• _i•.:c 's .Q. -�:C'!' ;•, i''ir_. �.. .sL...y?''i' ':'if2.r'_ .i.•. j.�{:
_
r
.r
r Y. ._._>'rr?••,..,r'1 .. � '�.c.... .,...fr•'i .^ .'.•3'L'' _;.+�,: ::•T:t�•:•'+' - . .» s•,1"�r' x,; ,_ -�, � -:
r-,.r.., .. --..1.4-.7.-_,!..•'::,:•;,,•._:;_t.:--;:.4....,,
.'_LJ;. if?'•r^7J L ..- ^�,�in:1.F'�i: ,'
t':`•'-:'`.' r - rL 6'.. �•�-. �T .:i•v;•L--�..,_. .... ..S:^: r.- Fl"..1:.t.;:::40:;..3.;.;
: :r,:..^..:•.�._.- J ..r ,�,rr. !.- {�.�•••�. ., •.. _r?i.�' s• :r' ,n- i:L•.- _r• �.i�ti '�� t., �'i+I� :k•��•'3.3t'. ,.t. .W�c'y�+- -c _nl•r tt?,' •J'r'f. .'1•T t -c 4,'.' ip� I.r`" _ - r• - _ ••r. r'l _l'.'.�'- ��•�.�-•�.?!.�. K��. f_Ei`t s� i_' �r_m.. .rG:•.:.: �:..:`•:1=i: .+- i_,. .. . _ - .t• .L.S`•_._aei .� '? ,_ - .�.. .�� _ ':fr: i. -
{ •• :�. ,• ...:.:ti . ....i:•::.. ..,:�-•V:'•�i« .,f¢. i_i - _'fir- • sy,.t �__- .. � s.: •._.�..-_:i,..1.•..r.-,.:.�'•i�.;. :. ,*y 'Ire•.: r` t .-J... - ,� - S t� h� ��' •n_��sR E '{.;,,C�� .s.lra�:- _� , ._as.. - ..<. .., _... .h. - •:"'- ,,r:-: L •• =:-Tr-r-:.t:.�.ru .�-'•:" items 'i-F*`- r^i !:a •.!,:5 . `r� •'��1,7'is1� 1"• .}�_- Tr.-'.It: ,A1.T � f i.rs•-. J ,ur,. 7i-- •r r 1���rd'�r��=�J"I,� '._
C.. .•f! •'_Y :+'.:^• sic;'• �• e���•?"_,r„ r {� �� :a y�t"t _ ���.'1��,�rv..:r.":_c.t✓yti._„� :�
•
r t•' �i:r+ .a-„•:i.:. _ .3 -�- - .;c Ij :-�,•r i}}t of
-..- '.-_T-_ :x�_ =:•l: .:x. .,a' � '�- -5iE" - fit..
1.11
- - • _ r�'.r :' - 7. =r :!'_'::��: •� � .r.t. e?t It��,j ,� 6u•. .7.a.1_- �_ Lyi� _il"� !t••••��� :'H. r." ']�,r._.t: •arm U -`Fi?s'k o`'I.'1'� a-._ .Is ! _:Y' ..r:C.,r>.;'�'. _;':t�.. •i�^:;s rr++.�.-),,,�. ,• .S'_ :'ii_. t i,+;',':J{..:tSJ•;::..,+r•,�: ^^ +Y�?!�t�.,,�[;,,,,_ �a �.n�.�� �'TY_: �-'.�,.._a�d:`•- -�'-_•�'..._ i._ 1. :r.:..w:•. -^J,'[.l,:a'` - Q� - `:r-,.{I U:••y.._„ = •:FrI.,.•_ :,t T. rlBaa• ''-_`"'.0-,yr -:c _ !�S-�^ -: ,a Z! .:`. -
_.-mo �•' :, s:. .! � _ i,,-e, T.. 's`F'_ •:•. :. tr_ :..i-- �..:itis::' 1• . E .L 1 ,r.,•V"'_ .,M .r. es 'G ?i•^ - -'a >.. ":c•i• i.•.;t• - ,a.:.:._ ,s.•r.:._ _.,�-n=Cf.,• -i�='e :'i.. .,+,J��_t - u•��T•�.�Si ...,�,,I-���n [.�•�r'e.- 'i! 5�%.rr'.�.s:�, '�r�•cL'+.�_• .-'£:�*f•• :.:1=•'.r.r� -�..t.�. :.x�,r.-_ ;rF' ."j'::'. .. .r..... ":+5�;'::«e;I.,..!4[:F - Ts'�r nG:S't'- '���` �''�!' '�9',:_rSe^F ..el e. i,'1,j! rr•.�.r .:;..:,i,.:
; :� 'IS .rfSat;r:
,. _ .._.. ..._ F,-"'iv"" .... ,.,_ ..•,ur.- � - _ -•.c�'i::-i_ti'i�-•�:4a.�. Kr•�; rs9 �'i•''- �J 1_..� i+•. ':.^'.: y..
, .;:..•.,:':...:.IT•• -!••jJ 3Lr':..::._ ,..... '.�.:.�._y.,:T _.K r';!ix?:.: �'i. �:.iZ-'•+� _ -�•-�.
:�...�--��'L. :.-(`�•a._u,: ` :_... ... i''�r a: >y�� ._.J .ii., •.:i�. rs!' ..t•y...:dl�r: i4^'. �'.I _-Ui .��'�:Lt.�•r._�- ') - _i.7 iti� �s ?
AM.!.�.�r
1 � ....�._ _.....,.,s..:t.:.a. :' .+.; -r\,.r ..�.•..., •_•' �?A t _ f� ti �:;.1'"Z„,-,. .-''``1��.-t�• _• .a 1 n-�.•+.•^ '�K. 7:;MO
_ /'Y
� .!•. T_r��s...r. x '.s-_ ! as:a.�s�� 7�-1i .:� .:/,�- ,�� .QCT"t='`�`�t•�•f.- - - -�000-::'';:i
' � ®
�".,: _::e,s.-..-i•.. •r- : -f:- '.�':i;;•.•. Vi.' ,�_ A•'_st•: - i►r..,Sy' -fii til.:1 .. ,F= �T'=t'f -'f"._'X�e3.:su� :}:Wst'+"1 r F.'r _�''•'=iJ:�` - !:,'s..ds•.'tC' 1.!- ''ir.•' �•'S.. :4 - .n -'F• r:l�.i � �iL. -- _ - `'ice.- �-�_�.' =i!•'1u: -t :114: •ai..:�:t•,. r_ }y9'r.' :'s' ��_. �: ,"•-} :,.x�. �� _- ..�.,. .} _ �- _.p=. :tom'{. s7; ,rT- ::.r• s'` - - - , <9r -.1- ..., .'4. •-t- $i!r)4�'' :-.r _..:,+z: �'J,:i'::.'Yic:.'i�t.' �s-- t..T s,:. J�s': ': - - •d•§` .� R t:r,'S'r _•�S a3'•-� +a s?:� .t�� ,.r•fr! - 11i1/44
.,:.' �� �.•i :1Jftr,' ::35. - _!.►:__ -;J•�=.••i.}1s..:..> r :.Y.: ._ �-.1_ S _ --6 6 _ `e- -I _-,+` _ ��•rs:'�C .�'t F.•: t�,.
y-S - - =:5.F•_,n: :,>r'r•t-7I��Fi ''ii�:'�..z •M�i..r: {'t r,e:•i_:ra. �...fir t.l �'tr r�^r';c•�• �37t'v'a�� _ � �L,i`'�i,•.
1! ,s _ »•.tin ='^`l..t.' '?-K: at L,-,-ji:i+f •i��.:'St =•F'• :.Y.•S�':i! ,�,... ! "�Y:. "'r' 1 w•L"_` �_ 1F �-7 �'•��: �i i- !t•,�C Wit,'J.'
�:I' .:t° .�I:.:.,�i.. ra,. :,�' isi': tr: L' :.:. r - _ - a - -_ } : -1"�Tl[' :i w.tF...-.
r !- :T.. -- t,r��, ^'i. :s�-'.'• f•ti ,`r:.�. .i:�. � •' • - s'. "�'.! .••rYi.�.. , � � Y..I_
..r..:' ';:R�• .•3! ..R�' .-:.s's.:..'•JQ�'r,•ti... ".t. -4�::r.� �•w•. :t.•:!;':l tepN-f ::1. _.'� .re'_: ,_.1.--., '� - T - C�'Tc,.�_r'rf. �. L*Ts{..^T.:�'-`�• ;�r•t� (•i`.t,..,.��s�.
♦:i.r� ..r!f:. ..r•
!"eT'.:e.._r" ::i:' ,11:,. - «•s .:s 'i' ��� - - �:L i� -i:'it
�.t• /h..tL.^5,�.�.
_ _[.r..t••.- _`f': 'i:,_1.i('�,�.• w}rt•=:'f`''Fi.� ;'t!._-.7 _- Mit:::**
•�'�i:�'. ':d':'��.rli L'r. `s id S nu_ _ .� ..1 - v� � � rr✓t:�'1J
b..:.---:411:;;.:..-E4-::At-
-" .r ,.J -g:31.''
Ij.}�,'i - ._}rw •;i..._ i �.. �♦. . d fin`: �1 .: �]^r ..�"-•i {�7 r:J"i!' '-i L.+'-
- 1=� -:... (r:t;_ v:iirs :Y _ .-r�"tii- .L:_{.:'S• � ."i.S:C".'L {s - I .`,i ,cam •.a;,:�'�r'`,\ i i:..-..:.r'-..xi•.':..r. e�t� .s{,l =rit''•:+rF::'+.�7_ C.'r' (''1"•- •{;' ^�. s:..ri�'.�a'R- -..if•'t���' -•7b 7t- .} ..Y'�1f:.'as'�. ii'B+. - t•+ :L.t:r _ . nr•� �j• ..L: ,,: !4= ; - _, -, •i :r.i•~ _ 7'.Fc .?F' -4_„ i- L .� rn w_>•-i.9 n, ••�t'w .1:` .� � c..s�..'7s .t'Sa2'"� �' A,T'moi. s. .r._ .••tc- �ry 3S�'+1: -] r._ (:rwk-.�'.'s... i � 'y ''ilfti,44.-te6tza;f8grki
JiS', _ `�v:- _ j ti - .3F .7 ..I'' r t ..'7_.ii�•��-J, .,•?F! 1 fr:.J - w, T•� "�} r d. �f .:�•' :i'i� v i• � _ _�_ 1'.}(j��. .,r-.,' L4•=S' .I.:Y-1;'i'•_.� - ^ -']. ,J.. _::yi:r-:' .''A• ....t::- Q1':.,4f ra - •Vic - -���.l� _ - `A-r�1•^ 4 � �{ti r.r %,•2iLti:_I, .a:;._c.. s�'.:.-�4:...:rte:i�.� � :iYt-•i:e� ,j¢ti�tt - +•:• iLV'i_Zr _ -, t.:t' �.�• .Y•trs .... pi Ij��,.' r>z.�.r`-.'r.. _• s...3 L ..: .: ...:: i� .r; '•A=�,r S t L�:"e.i'-. ."x`i - NS;
:-t'l,r74:.
f r .s- �,. -•�r�_ '`i:,� i .r 1 :c .vf.,IIIe..wy:i . !'_ ...sL�`.�rsts::.,.t ._fir.. -Ir.. [. : ..�:,�•:�_•��•,A.-'. ti'�•3 �u ail- `.L 1' s �- - � u�tL�t�t-d,•,.:7rN. f. .� �lSI' .L; �J"a�"'-i�" "YJ c,41,F.. :r-- ! L. �♦ r f� `� a'..lr•�iY.i•.Fr .3��•-•:-` J.i�; 1: srate��1'r.:�. :" +.._ It•.:_f" •..`•: �r -,:C:.se iyart':' +�!) - - '- I:-
I r�1R31^+L '- ,' i i FtAiVirlciE-1',',;
t'i't', •.t 2; : 4., - i--t■. s._..�_,•^„. �,i s. t :._c mak,+-G, .�._•t i E�na, �t .L_ it .1�.•r-.('iJ;.-,. .. �. �'P . .-`•R'.ry1,-3..__ - _.r._.c'.:.... �.:.•,-iJ�. v'L rr� -:ipr .e,' `�J.eh' 'IC,'�-�'k� '�'� �I„ , -is` r,•;•r•:,�,:tom� �_...r.:�_.tn.�: ' �-� �3,, ,�.t•^t l�.���. _••i-:i .+'yf••;CSi'yti`i.1-!:_k-"' 4It, `'= '`` • 4 Q0L7 _,i_,. �.i:,5u �L y.:'t. ...`i,.t„+i- 2..r�;`!`.Y. %!7l • rii_��4�����+� �� - �r?'�1s.n
= ,_ '��' __�JF1�11 a �-H- stnVii_ :ti:+ �?^ TG, �:' .. ^� I � rr- .{^ _ •"+'!'�-�� +L,G •:4`�i - 1 a L-Fz- �• .�..�_ r� = _ .s T. J C,3_i3 t �j si�T�-,L�i[r. �37'i• � 11,•F ;l it eT' a .}t _%, _f:.• i:_wr _.ty, ` .y �! ,y .rL-`t'E��''iF.'�-�s•i-- '�•r;�'�:� ik'./:,:i.;,,,q,:::m.g.iitt i^ '>••I�r L4- i f 1 f -dt�?)3E J}-.- t 1 L s'� ' ��csu�7� � _ `Q•.l rN,rrr, _ � •i t.. ��!.yyt�u���^ � _rE',[l� i-��r�? �iw., �n'• L
ria i�F+ jri� -�•' `� �Y� -4_taar�,.2 .y��'r-,...--:-.,
�I.� �4 .,u;' _���t !!�_u.'�•i.• :U`4:•.���1 t 'r,,.. �.. 71 ��.� FylJL`_ °[� -li- ��IF7- .,,31.3r L �,: 1�3 �.' !� C;+4�[ .i •._ f - i, ♦ ` c •�yi�r.1t:rLZ: r..- cYr ,-z,z �9_^ "fl_. I4.. .r!•'•t itVii:`' �r' ; .-.�e•":-�''}j�.F-,
* r; l = _-..�c t;'' - s •F - , ,c7 CElF tt i}4 r�:i .�- .T:' �.;£ :,7-4��'t,/ _ rz;.7ry.•i. ll'•,dI.r .-„--; i ,.--, ti',,-t- Y cr r ,l;•N.:._.• __ry. y ti..•.J ' •t
- '.. L:'t'fTi: ,..Is to:r''" _e~!t.�ii: !r•j; 3 icJ_, f••'!'_ 'ta''n1 •=,_..171: _F.t,:i��
`_v ����c�{r_�+ig� t ..i> �"iq i r? •,,.,t-4,- �,;g ...E.'
i _+` ';VZ.„
, y';' i''riff;
i l••
^'" 'FI •- •r:vrt���tr(�T-tvg-v r ../
._ �:�, _` 6'_'�•,'4r.=..-1 r - - ...a :,•.?!.
�}�,=tl r r. `•• r.::� r'• s:?�'i?L9''_. Mr:7,f
`iii _,f :�: .4 •`.' r_i•.' ��'!' _ i' 7�iC.,, - - _ •t', 'I! F!-,..!�i_•� .�' r r _ O t d,�,E r . ? l•L-_,£?:r•:r.( _� �,�,,p"�_p� :,4rt : �r�jj f 4.'.%,�• - 11 1�-1,'fa,]}cl•'� t,•ra_ ,iF- Y.'r i•. 1't.f;llL'L'a' '•:,t`s�•'lii-i--v f'^} -II+'h's. air' �-Z • ,ice }. - iii:r. ,,.µ�l•�•3-�tk.
t
_ � sr >1•• •a'� �T��-��c,i Sy: ^?� .,,,,Y,,,:::--x-ti,
- it-A•
i r�t'i,>.'u:.. ..'"•.'4,j'v.
�1.. _ n - C .i' L•�[--'*�-.ri'='U- _ 3•r;L'•r.E%,,r�`T-1...�L-.3f �'.. 1 _ :L ,f• 1 s_.s I'•17,.,•'_•...'".t41.':'';t
��' -• ,r; a .---'
:� �� ,?x` ,1.'"
�r� '�-;:s. 1--1:01-
I
e�li
-. _. ���w51(, a�'=` 'r t y •� '�i'(31` �� a.r � rr. � .A-.f.•' �.,���' Mom
r
I r. Aii g_:,S c-7.• _ ...•.._.,,.•:1----
i.._._.._•,_ ..s•,• t._ ..�. •_r:' .F ,}-'• 3 •f; ,,..t-- ` ...,r ! r .,.. 18Y iLi! ,
' ,' ,. - �-Jati�- � r`' _ -- `��� r^ ,[ t�-.tom r _ _:::.:
LL ,fie 1 n r ::}r•ta 'a ! '!C
! t•• -• r.. .._.� _- _r-�` - 7 :t• !' - I IPA
;.'.t.' :Yt =i". r.
"--::i, L r
..... [''��+ � - �-.r. ...t, r.. - .r- ... _i� ? n ,a iy b. '� � r �,�+tr-
- t'r Ewa(`.,,,_go ^yi' l •rK !" `i� �' wr' z E'`- 3;1'`':'�'t•i:: •r• y^�'•-
-4:
s'r
Cs,._di .F �f _ _, ::` .1" .i S?'- a3�J,7r:�- latfet:1
r..li• „-
•
.r._-._.-fS r>-FT-.f.- i J:' r'- � t- i•`.•..t iffa«'.:..rt,;•.., :: -"��� - n: �.•.`� i/�s. �• r1f. r1. r-� -,rf~_ .^� ,•T.. �s^. ,{•. .tF+ '.i1�t`.:FiFS'��,:�••tSt�i�'r - _ •m aill.'_.
' FZ Y" r;"r i , rr ti;: �i:' fi 7, at.,. �_t i r t..�x�cy ::,,4�}
L ,L. - 7_*• _ :Y - N _ •ei �e1T. _t:: s. f.: .s�[rs r R i�T r••: sa,y.l
' .,.� r r `ii ,i= Rf:' ler'
:ii• rir..C:i°•nY C JC} i �.•:49i!
-L!'=;ti�.s:^�� i^„a:
s .A.'1-'-':------..
Z�� a'1 � it- :F: 1. e!' �c:: 'F��`r•',,iii Ii,:•Cy':�ry.*a_.s''=� c•s<':i ri•'^"�_u ti.'.�,'x„-''1�.f;{::� T•it•
( rfi -,r? u'' , •.f? .r, 1 :Pt.r•. :'c' •:r:c''r a �.
i J :Jit � w- Ji .. "" a:. 'y�'i.•f-.:._:ti}�",rr..•Sr••.� ,t •1 � �•J:
t � i.. ,� tr. !•rr 4';t .+t in 's +S' •{31.�• .r,. :Arr
l�n.�i.j `. !•t&^+l•r ,.. '2r� rff:. A LIt•'a� t-L..___....IroliSi t i• .r+ a••riv
J::L_ �- :r � 11 F '�f.�F �L f�.Jt tw " �i �.x � .`s:. i�.�tiwir i:'. '_r 17;117.‘.:i-..1.i...r1:011'.1'f,"."-i.;.,;;;,-,.
, �y,�F'ii ni'•�i.
,•.� s. ��: '..R (' �� _ i` .. c; Yiirl?::-4ffigk
'�f�cSr-h.,_._.1 1.N.•' i-1t�•� • .sJ' t!'}�'r's �rf� }T �,( � 1 16 s _'%= r1.,C^• _}.:�r.E,�i:;; > :
s ;��:�'..�' •� R .t.. �T•^s_F' sr = re<:. „ - . i• . .i: _..:at , / : .T 1• :S t` -1. i.r. ty.1•' IL � `-�^��a ,� �: i�r . , ,"�.r' c_yI,F:'i-0t,:r• _.I 'ts1� r�'�4_1
J�� sf ♦.rii•� � � K' .' :rs�f ��.',,j� �, 1 ��, �f,,:.' •�.�+r�b" i.' ,,r e�.�„�.l_S' gg pZt j'j`�r1�f,. i s' i ', t --,"ie't.' :, � ,.; :::.n`•t t i yi:•} s.•ti-Y� ;:-
t:,-'= J::•fr:"xv�.'_ >:.�e
,e,"'
}�• "�dy� ,�� c s�'r •'- ..1.,.j'T.1' 1 �{, � sS! i '�;i'iw..Ttl^ ,.__ ,'1.'s _ r - via J k.•�S'^iGi;:•"`r"i:•�
�_..1A ;�_5` - -ti = ,!4 J,i �s:. ` c r ` .rrsL�' t "��rs� K, i - %4 L ••u::
y• �. _ -2.0-ms- YJ:..:;"IG`-,,„1„5M- F-- S .,-,-
: ri.-e.._._i,li2•.. ie._ .F.... at.•a. t•'Y; �`'�-..is
i'��rrYr..::i'' c�.;.`! •� ':ti;c1�=' r'It��ii:..�'!)f�.�T.i�C'•�rr!��r �;YI _ t7-., -i�.;.r�•l:
.. Yeri
r r. - _
_ .�. _ ''-';' ''''-it''''''''
- .}:_ . :•!••;' ob.Rid,.+i•a:..rf''it:'sn:,!'s:!'i^'is!'. ci .� t• .,rrs.'-.,WV
'
�r ����� - t
: h ''��� ♦,��� 'k Y' .,=-.e .f-1:•�:F� _ 4 �s F1+ �_ ��-..Vic:._ `�_:- l�:T• .�r�::}_�'s.tie•`:....�s:?s..:.F.`6 •
4::::::.4„:„._ L:�-.; '„,.z-J,. �-•.A =r:v-tt.. ir�.,.� e-4,---,',-,
''iZ: _.moi:y J]'ra_r.r'I-.i;•t,.L ai•i�V r'a'•_.YF -J _(><l w �:t� 1 K� tS �='> -Q1l`'Y r
..`La .._ -a....._-.._ _ }° --_. • _ - - _ .L,_,.r R: _,3 _ r't 1r::. - - - -:s:. ::l}!ti'::.
•
[[rr,-j4 1,1z .,r.f i :.x,r s._R .4 �-.F: 41:3,1'.-1.:._
q _".sr2'r•.:. ::i _1-
-III " '• ,. t! 3Si:..:.i L k c' .£i-+fitr :,Y .t`1 r r r +L• •': I,M. 1 , A •
4' j _ ,i• s .F •,'•••••
i: _.T 1?.-..:-. - .rr:'L ..,�•J._:-' T 1`. �w
Y f \ 1 Riparian
�#% •PCZ
CSis f.
-LE.Y q
•
C revit ,?' :O
tea, ►, "
MA RVI N G. STAFFORD, P E
ELECTRICAL ENGINEER .-.1•W214
PIMA COUNTY
1 +'
''`.� ���•'�"
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
PHONE:(520)740-3728 -UNDED1g '
150 WEST CONGRESS FAX:(520)740-3900 �r
TUCSON,ARIZONA 85701 � lw
marvin.stafiord@pima.gov •
ZAL PLAN COMMENT FORM
Website Information
1. Do the changes that have been made address the issues? Yes No
If not, what do you recommend?
2. Please list any other issues or changes that need to be made?
3. Any general comments?
Land Use Changes
1. Do the changes that have been made address the issues? Yes No
If not,what do you recommend?
2. Please list any other issues or changes that need to be made?
3. Any general comments?
All Others
1. Do the changes that have been made address the issues? Yes No
If not,what do you recommend?
2. Please list any other issues or changes that need to be made?
3. Any general comments?
General Questions
1. . Did you get the information you needed? No Yes
If not, what information do you need?
2. Any other comments regarding the General Plan or the revision process?
ti'1)(=i`:�i A t/U t t TA KG-5— A I-7 N. -T I 1-=W 01 .S T4 r- Y U V u i i r ,A-Pi'rC 3.‘1A� ,
‘v t.71-1 ArE_-tv -�r .�. u v .v( t 4/ .4 S C>L)r(IC i-r '\-S 'Trtcz,
/',- t/v T t—�'r� � .y -�!!I,V� 1 oa 4,/ l?/\- 14 O t\'p�`.
'{ov C'HA4'6ir_ 77 ti4cjS TO fr -`L - -77:,4`A 1:_z'W r
H EAT TIME Li CA L r AT --(0171-L- E i= ( -tH s o a
kAl E.Le-c-rED 6 PF I C/f4 1,S s` 0 til
ct—//1„--1
„,,,40 co„, st.
Signature(optional) Contact Phone / Date
Email Address(optional)
Titanic you for taking your time to help us improve!
-.0,14er '-
°UN D ED 1g'l
GENERAL PLAN COMMENT FORM
Website Information
1. Do the changes that have been made address the issues? Yes. No
If not,what do you recommend?
2. Please list anyother issues or chanes that need to be m de. �r — c �)_
/11.
Vrl� r(77/1/1-4-C
_ _✓ � 0 Irt •
3. Any general comments? ",
j1�.. 6311.',79-7P i:A _ �.���� Ed2
tet-
4
! r
Land Use Changes
1. Do the changes that have been made address the issues? Yes No
If not, what do you recommend?
2. Please list any other issues or changes that need to be made?
•
3. Any general comments?
All Others
1. Do the changes that have been made address the issues? Yes No
If not, what do you recommend?
2. Please list any other issues or changes that need to be made?
3. Any general comments?
General Questions
I. Did youget the informationyou needed? No Yes )
r
If not,what information do you need? ` _"
2. Any other comments regarding the General Plan or the revision process?
_II pi
(optional)tiona
Signature oPl Contact Phone / Date
g
Email Address(optional)
Thank you for taking your time to help us improve!
..,,., ',.:;`,,,,,,,,o,..0.,•,„,..' :','!",,',,,
' 4.,00.,,;:,-4•,.4(r...,,,,..-,,,,',-..;•
.,.
•
...
-","„:',..,,...,:•.„,
'•;•,,,,t :.,.
:..,••''',.
•...,.I',
,.,,,,... ..„
,,,,,,'9, „.• ,
- .,Ii•., ,•-,,,,,,,,,,...,
i.•"'''.''',:-,', ',,,,i,,./(.-". ..
,;',1,-..."4 , .,,,,,...,„i;. '''''..!... -.,i,';',.,•,.....,:'.4':',."-"",("--','..„,,,,i„,
'- ,.••••."'„,,,,,i•
...,.,...4.':..,.,,c,.. -;.4',,
'.•.,,e,,,V:,..,::!)/;;.
.,....,--•-•,-1,;',,_
,„,.:''''',,?;‘, ..4.;,',,!•.'',,•,.,1,,,,:,,i'4'..••''''.;.i.:`:,,- •';;;',''.:','',:::,:..: ':',....:L'.•'''',:'
... . ",...
,.; ' ,, '''',,',,.,i'''.''"ti,,,. '.s.i.'" , ;*',''.`''' .•,' ''
'.• '':',",„,,:','''''''' ' '.''''',„'',,,,", :.7'''':'.'•' '
,,,,,- ..,.
',,'',', '
',. ',....
'A 4'2')"':''''''•:".:-/'......'''...'• ''''
..
•
. .,*(1,1,,!!.;..,,.....,.'*:.,.:, ''
.,.,, 4,- • . -....,„,- ,. , ..
..,,,0„.,,i„t,,,,,,,,,.,,i.• -.01',.'''-•,,,, ,', ....'`‘.',.t,, •. t ,,
4.,,,,.,:,
0
,.
,
--,....:,-„,,,,,,, •
..7. „ .. , .
t,.. .
-......,,,,toi ,..-,,,,,
.,,,.. .
...„ , ,.. .,
,
,
•S.
' .';•:4''''''''''''''''',':1:-.''''' ,,,,,.,,"'`. 1...*.ltiLi''1". ''',,. ,,.
.' 1::4';'•.0,1J'';',;';':„Affil,(M°1';':'
. • '.,-,*',,,'.'',.''''' :.'riii .,'. •; ''-'':'''•
-,,,4,:;:,:;4.• .,1;;;;:';'''''
t, ..,,, ,7i.',',..''.ii...' ,,;',./:,''',.1.,,,!.1,i',!N,',,,,,,,,i;:•"<**.*:,..,';'.
,....,01...';t:,..
• , , ,••.,;,,,,,4,4,74:,',' ,*' •
''',,-"fii,...i -*
',;;;?;:,'"'""•: :,...'',-''''',.::,,,,,,;.,5;::,iii••,:.,-;,'
•' '',4' ' . ' ' 'N''.''''''' .
''.•:',7',::-:,,,,,,',*;';',,i:',..;:'.:
,
N,
',.........
................ .
.,.. •, ,,,,,,,,I.1„,...-, „..7,,,,,,,,..r.,, ,4
"-,7,;4,tt •:::•i?'"';',.;-::::,,,,..;'-';,. ..-...:7,,-'77". —
''...," i',..•.- t,.:, .
I,
..,,,,,.0,,,,,,,,- ,,,',,,,,,,-,-,'•4'. -
. :.... ',•,;.,',",',,,,
1'; ', :t.,,,•,, ' ik.IIIII.,....,... . ' ,,,,:,',:,,iltii',,',::i'l'''''''' .,--
''''7''',';'..,,,'''',',',','•'';';''''''';'''','':'1.
.•-'.:'4'„'
-,
'Nk .....,•,........._'.....,."',,.,,,,'',-..,,.,-,,,,',,,,,1, 9,..,..,.'.........
.•1
N„ , ' 4
,,''.'', •+
,,,„ „l.,..,,e,,,..i#.„".'.0,,,,,,,,,,i-t,,,,,”-„,t',,.,•,l:'.'::'
:',,,•.,1,,'
,'*1
'', , „ .c/.+1
t14' ill1 '',,''
P
tri'.l !. 1)4t',#,70
"”.-.-'-.,-,,,,',,',,''1%''''''','''";,'*•,',,';,';4'',',
. ,
, ..
-4,-
,.. ,;,,,IIM)P.4,-,,,Z;,.;-::".
...4,1;,,,....,',....,°,,,I,!.,,.'
';'.,."''''''';',,,,,'',,A41..?;!,,.'''',',i',4,,,!':.”.,....',• " '''''''''''' -' '
,,,i,:,:.;,,,",;::::1,:',:l'i'iii.4,,4'fi';',-.• ''',,': '
..,,,,„...,,,,,,,;.,..:',:,i'
''.--400'.',..'1,,,T.'
;,„,,, , '-''''.:',47,:,,,,,,!,,',,, ,,•,''
,,,....-
;7,1„ii,!;...•• ;,,C;' ,&':1,:,',4',','
: ' . '''. '' '''' :''''''
,,:i:,, ''' „.,- ' :''','''';„:41,4',1',."'Y''4'''':'
' , ,":, . ' ; '':':,..,jr,,"?,/,:;',:,;,:''"
,,,,,... ,,,.,,, ,..
.,./
,„,...
.,,,,, .,,, . .,.,
''.•; '',''''. :::';' ' . . .v. :*,;:.;-''
,,,„, , ,..,..,. , , '
'' ' --'''''''',1'1,..;,'
s„.;,...„
.
- ,-,-...,,, ,„‘" , . ..• -':",,..„„:4.•".;-i,1-4...:,,,
„,,',.•. ,,,,,..'.''',''',.;11;,;,„7,,,'''',„ii;:,,',.';'":',„:;,;,.;',.:.,:.:'''.
,, ,,','/,',
.,:„,,,...,,,„,,,,,,,
, .•.,,..'i,;,,,,,..,,,,,,,',,,..,:,:-.2„,,,,...:2:,,,-;•,•,:.:,;;;,,,,.,,,„.„...
,... . . .....
,,,,,,,,,,...-.:*.:,..•:•,,:: :.::::,.,7,,,:,7,,,,,,i,,,,4,,,,,,,,',"',',,,,
-,•,,"--;,,',-,•.:,,,,,,',,,, , '''''---,,,,,„:,#•,”4:
''''',4, '''';',.;',1',4-'''''',"'‘.•41•,1*:''' '
.' '....'1,-,•-•:.•;';'.,',1;;71.). ''.''''''''''',7.;:','1.•,$'‘;.f‘'.
•,-,,,,,,••••,,:•;•,•'''
' ''**".....„-,.''•-,,.,.'.,,,..1',„..,'
:,..'.1;',i,,:„:•-,,,,,,'1,';•'-;',';7';';'•'''''',,,..'c,',1:?e:',.'1.::'',.''
,, ,—.,,,..,.:::.:,,,',.,,,,,,„;,;:,!;,,,..,„,..;,.”,, '
,-,',,,,,''',..',.''-., ..,:?,,,I.',":-.;,,,,',,.,:',,.,. .-,-,,,,i,.,:,,,,,:i'-'4,,,,i;,,,, •,,, , .,,,•';,ri..,,,,',,
,,,,,,,,, ,.„,„,.,,,,,i'',;iii!:;ft.",',.. ',:,,'''',:•,,,',.:./.:1'.',,'''':;',.';':' ;',Or?!,V,';',',.';''.''.,.;.1.',;1:1.!t":,',1,.;.,':: .,..,,,.' , -. .....,.,,,,:: .'-..::' :•-•::'''''::::::;,,',,/
. ,
0 .,,,,,,,,,,,,„,,,,,,,„..,..,.,,,,,„,„.,,,,,,,:,.......„,„„:„.:,„„.,, :.„„,,,,,„,,,,,,,,,,-;,-., ..,..: „.,.,„,„,,•„:, „,,,,„•,...„;;:•,,,,...,,,• .
,fr.„.,..,:„...„.:,,..,:,,
,,.,„ ..„,
. ,. ., , .....„, .
... .. .,....
,
.,..
..... ,•
•,.,,, ,,,,,,,,,...,.
..... .,,..:,
..,. .„ ..
..,
,,,, ... . .
,,,.. „...,,...,;.-..•:•,..„.„,,..„,„,...„,,,,:„.„:„,.r.,,,,:,,,:„.:„/„..,..,„,..,,..
,...„„,...,,
, .. ...
' .„.,.,:,....„,„...,„„.„,„„ ,
.. ,,..,t....,.., .
,„,... .,
it'''''''''';':":.--''''. . '
.. . , .
eg,0 f.,
,,,,titaiv,It
,
'''''V:'''''''',4'''''"I''''''''''''''•.-
,. ,•:.4-•,.- ,.--.,. .:,,__4,,,,, _0.,.. - ..-.,-,,,••...moo.,„„,h....,.. „. ,
,,
, . -
,,,,
. 1A,0„..,1:41,'•
-.:.;',..•,?:,:i4.4';t;',,l'4;;C:H' ,E''-*'' '"1-';i::'4'44;,-....Wc*c'q"44:4*:„„`....,,,,,!,•.:4•'"'/.1.;', ":.1%.14,4. .,..lit,•'"...., ..**.orw.*
. t, r.,.r.,•., ':'
„.,,,,..,..,..,,,,,,„,,,
,
.. ., . ,,,,,,,, A '
' 7,i,t,,,,:r.,;:.,
I.
.„., ,
I . ,., ..„., „./ ,,,
:.,..1 ,.. qr''ffd-,,),,,:,'.'"'''''''!. .' ..k.-'4,,,4,,,,,,-•, , '' -*4.'',,,,,,. -.44. •;,-- ,'„ , , . , - -.,,• ,,,,,...„,,.-- "...,.... „,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,:,,l,',•,'•',
„.. ,,i;•„",,,..'„' ' - ,!;,..,',...•;,",:,,,,”;'•.,.-,„...,',,,,,,,,,,,,t,,,,:..,,,,,,,..,,,,,,!!,,,,,,,i;,,,..,;,),,,i,,,,,•„„, ,,,,,„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,;. _-4,e f„; , ,,,,,,, ,...,;,,,.,-:),..,.,...,..4 , ,„„„4 :4,,,,, . 1),„..,,,,,,,,,,,:,:,,,::„4r0,,,,,,,,Fk:4,;,,..;,,,,,,,,,.,,,,„,1
. ...
,„„,,
..:-4,,,,,..„,„..,,•,...,,,,,,,,,
,' ". , . - • '' '.''','. 7.I.,. ,, „,.' .,,_,, '..,.r.:4'....„.',',.:'
s'...,"1.,,''...•,:'''''4, pfli ;.::* . .i*."'.7',.f.'...'.', •., :' '., ''-: 1 ' '''''' 1141,*': '' '''' .--.'::: '1''"f:'''''''.•'::':4
' H '' Vt . '''' '''' '4144114.- I ' . . 44-4-, ,„ • .„„gs.,,..„..„„,:,
. ,..
,4 fr,,,•. -,,,, .i„, ,..t 4't A-t: •-,'"'. , '„ -", '',,•''-'''•..'' ''.'-''''.%'''''''.' '1. ,;/ i-1 . '' '''''' 'g:'" 1 Ply
. ,..6 .-. '4' ':- t!oit' . ,,,,iva
, , „. .,..„..„,.., . , ,,„... ..,_
‘,..., ,„,,..,;,,.•,,,..,,,. . , ,4•,,.''-', 4., , ,, -,,,,,-...i„,, „...,,.,",,„; .,' .,,,,,,,,,,,,,
•-• , -,-,,'''',':-...,,,,' , ''',e,ir,,,,,:: -,,'.,*,,,,,,,-1...,,,',4,1,-,•4r,i',.1,'.
A,..„,.. ,k-,,..,,,,,, . el
.
.. ' -.•- 1,... -1,44.,$.,,,,,..".-,, '.."?.,',,,'", ,N,1„4:.•..1,..--',,'' .'*r•, ' . 44
',;(114.....;.,..k,
i r . ,
•,...,.'--,' 7.,,7, '1,,,,,,..t.-.„1„:.••,.)„,,.:•. ...4,,,,,,,,f;4,,,:.„..,,
Town
•
;14, .,,... ..
noi....,.,,i6-): ,,,,... .-_,,..„.„ , ....,,,,,,,::„..,,, ,,,:;„: . .,,,, ,,..,,,, ,,,..:..,,..,,,.,, ...„,,,...„,
.
piary .,..;.4,,, ,, ,,....i.-, , ',..,.. ,,,,,, ,',...,:,,,f,,,.::::..,,._,... ,.,,..„,,:,„..
• '---,:,, ,,.,.„"7,,,-..,,,...,....... ,... ..;........„,„ ow
, si..... .„.,, .,,,-..,.. ,:,......; t:„.„...:::,:,,,,,
1' .''.,,,,„4,,''•:''',7,'-,.,",to,, '',,,.. '....',
.4kttt,*!;,,*:''' ..'.' : ,'
.,.
,:+.,. ,'A.:' '..3":b.:':;:i'-':':::, '4 11C47 '' ...."1
1
..,,,,,,,. ,,,;,,,,••,,, .
..,._,...-----.... ',r1,'' .-; '''''''''''' ':'-' '''''';,:-.' ''''.-**!. '''''Ilfli:• ....‘,..v'''''' ',,,,j'441jr- „r!kil, '1:';' -
. ,
. .
' .' -,::::,. '-',°:„•"'. itt',..*,-,,alf0,1,,.7 , ,, •
. ..„...... .,..., 1, ,..) ,„ uenera
, p,.. ,....,..,,,..,,,...,'.444,4.,' -,^ .7'...‘„...,7,-..*...,1.4.,4,,,,,,--1•,,,,..:;;'
, •1.:'..,n: ,..,,,,tf.,,i2H,..''
. , •
'iritt ,,', •t',,,::',1:,.:7i,,,;:,..`., ... '.,A,....0 1,, ,...;-t,9,,,,t,,,,,,17,,,,,-;.e.';',,-,..;‘,,,i,::,,,,,,.i,..,,..:,..s:,„„.„,,,,,,,,k,I,.4..„
I ..h., ,.•,.41..,,.- -•••'',.'•:•,-,..,,,.. .. .,'- • ' '..,,,,,, .4 ....' ,
'' I a*,'irt,. 0-''..' .,4-4..i''''4i,',''...1.•••'‘'''''','''''''''L.',**,.•'114,,i.'1', `..4.','.. .' ,,,...',.;
-. ''••'0.‘'.''' t'''' ',-'''.. fi''.-,•;#'..°-,...1(I", .,,,,.. ''. ..., ,A2`„ .1.
. ,
' 44.17!..-,A,'•10 ,.: ,..-1'-.kr.. .. .,,,,,.i.,..,:,,.4,,w, , . . ,„ ,,, •
..r, •-• .1 4,-,..i,,
,' . .','..:•,,:-/-.'''.-i'',..„-..,'-..,',..,.$4' illi ,,....,.:,',4' ''''
_ '''..t,„::.'::::::,,i1.7.,:,:.,',,,:,',..;',..,:''' •:.. ,',.....,".I ',. ' ., ,
..11.1.."1"‘ •ile ,i., .
N 7
..,r,...„,,,,,
',,•:::"..,:..,.,`',•it,;.....'„- . .:,;'', '.
.
•... i4 1..• 'illr'
03,,,, , ......., .
.,..,
. ...
, ..,, •
1 ., ,,. • :., s ,....;., t„..tc, 4.,..„.. ,.- . 20
i . ., ,.,
...=.... :; • .-..,,... ,...
, ........,
,„
4.,0'..•:•vr • ....:-. . ,,,-..._,:i...7::.,,,,,;,-..
... ....„••• ......, .
..... ..Ass,.. . ,.,.• ..4
.,..
Adiforiii,• - ---. ---------;-'--- '';'• •••••
,.._ . .-• -.
,
.,.. .,. i , - -
„,
A,..'. ..„.... ' • .
, ,„,,......-. --''%
.,,,.., REVISED ,..:---,:,,,-, -.;:„. •:....„.•,._:„...,.., :.,,,:,.;,....••• ,-
,.
I m'i .." ,
V
..;..-..e,
,
' -"- -
..„ ,.„...,,,,,.,,... .,..., ...,
..,;:„„.,,,•. •- •:',*-
,
4 '.
,s, •,
a .i
1 ,.
•
•1
•* ,,
I
-,:, I ' •-• .,.....,, 5/20/2005.;','
Oro Valley General Plan Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 200.5
PREAMBLE
By affirmative majority vote, we the citizens of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona
establish and ordain this Plan for the development and support of the Town.
The purpose of the Plan is to provide basic direction and guidance to all elected and
appointed officials, employees, and residents of the Town in their decision making
process.
We intend that the Plan be followed and consistently applied unless and until
conditions in the community have changed to the extent that the plan requires
amendment or modification. When conditions warrant that the Plan be modified,
such amendments are subject to the process and approval set forth in the plan
according to Arizona law and the Town of Oro Valley amendment process.
Administration of the Plan is a responsibility shared by the Town Staff, Planning and
Zoning Department, Planning and Zoning Commission, Town Council and Town
Citizens.
ORO VALLEY'S VISION FOR THE FUTURE
To be a well-planned community that uses its resources to balance the needs of today
against the potential impacts to future generations. Oro Valley's lifestyle is defined by
the highest standard of environmental integrity, education, infrastructure, services,
and public safety. It is a community of people working together to create the Town's
future with a government that is responsive to residents and ensures the long-term
111 financial stability of the Town.
COMMUNITY VALUES
As a community we value:
• Our fragile and unique Sonoran Desert setting.
• Quality education as an integral part of our community.
• Economic stability that maintains our quality of life.
• The richness that art, recreation, and culture bring to our lives.
• Efficient government that protects the Town's long-term interests while being
responsive to present community needs.
Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003(revised Ma�20� 2005) Oro Valley General Plan
EVOLUTION OF THE GENERAL PLAN REVISiON PROCESS
The Oro Valley-General Plan Focus 2020 beganJanuary of 20
00 with the creation of
a public_ participation plan. The process which led ti to thefirst Town Council
t
adoption of the Plan is described in detail within the Introduction— _ on section of__th_is
document. The Town Council adopted the Plan in May 2003 and
Sed_a General
Election in November 2003 for ratification. However, the Plan was def
eared by Oro111
Valley voters 60% to 40%. Therefore, the ado�-ptioof the Plan was invalidated.
- n
Following the Plan's defeat the Town conducted- - - surveys and roundtable meetings in
an effort to better understand the rejection of the_Plan. After analyzing th
---- e-data,_the
-own Council appointed a General Plan Revision Committee in August_2
..�- _004__to
address the problems and_concerns xpressed by the communis .
--- e _ _The_eleven=
member Committee was charged with-_acidressing problems_with the_Plan and to
ma'e_necessary changes_or revisions. Throush_an_extensive_process of ei ht working
sessions and-one open housed the Committee ncluded its initial revisions
--- --co-- an d
I
orwared_the revised Plan to the Town Council in_December 2004,
On January_ 13 20054 the Town_Council held a Study Session with the
---- Revision
Committee and the Planning and__Zoning Commission __to review and discuss- the
revised Plan.__An additional Study Session was held with the Planning_and Zoning
Commission January_19 to further work out_details of the revisions. Subsequent quent to
this the Plan was forwarded for the State_Mandated 60-dayagencyreview.r _ ew. Two
additional Open__houses were conducted during the 60-da review to solicit further
Y
input. -
At the conclusion of the _60-day review the Revision Committee conducted- cted an
additional Work Session to assimilate and consider all input from the Town Council,
Planning_and Zoning Commissionenc views and Open House '`
�- .Y--_re__-- __s_.__ At that
meeting_ t e Revision Committee voted to forward the Plan to the_ Planning and
- onin Commission for review and approval.
ii
Oro Valley General Plan Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
It is the intention to include all identified individuals who contributed to this plan.
hp TOWN COUNCIL
C Paul Loomis Mayor
Barry Gitlaspie, Vice Mayor
Council Member Paula Abbott
I Council Member KC Carter
Council Member Conny Culver
Council Member Helen Dankworth
Council Member Tera Parish
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
Don Cox, Chair
John Arming, Vice Chair
Commissioner Bill Adler
Commissioner Teree Bergman�FAICP
Commissioner Pete Bistany
Commissioner Ken Kinared
IP Commissioner Donald Manross
6 Commissioner ?pgc1Kee
2004 UPDATE REVISION COMMITTEE
Bill Adler ____. ,_ Teree Bergmanf_FAICP
Carl Boswell,_PhD _____—____— _______ — Don ChatfieldLAICP P_.hD
lERobertDelaney_______ __ Carl Kuehn PhD
Melanie Larson _ __ __ _ Doug McKee
Rosalie Jçsa , MAI Pat Spoerl PhD
Ed TaczanowskX
TOWN STAFF SUPPORT
itBrent Sinclair,AICP Chair,Communily Development Director
Bryant Nodine,AICP Planning and ZoningAdmintstrator
C Jennifer hones Community Development Secreta
Diane Chapmen Planning and Zoning Secretary
E PREVIOUS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
It is the intention of this section to idem s all individuals who contributed to the Plan update_process
from inception_up to the General Election defeat of the_Plan_in November 2003.
i i i
Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005) Oro Valley General Plan
TOWN COUNCIL
Paul Loomis, Mayor
Richard Johnson, Vice Mayor
Paula Abbott
Bart Rochman
Werner Wolff
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
Bill Moody, Chairman '
Don Cox, Vice Chair
John Arming
Ken Kinared
Robert Krenkowitz
Donald Manross
Bill Matsukado
GENERAL PLAN STEERING COMMITTEE
John Neis, Chair Council Member Johnson Appointee
Allen Wright, Vice-Chair Oro Valley Neighborhood Coalition
Tom Bush Disability Community
Carol Clark Citizen at large
Don Cox Planning& Zoning Commission Appointee
Alan Dankwerth Citizen at large
Jeff Dauenhauer(inactive as of June 2002) Youth Representative, Ironwood High School
Dick Eggerding Greater Oro Valley Arts Council
Mary Glueck Mayor Loomis Appointee
David Koford Healthcare Community
Alfred Kunisch Development Review Board Appointee
Melanie Larson (replaced Andrew Way) Northwest Chamber of Commerce
Karen Rogers Council Member Wolff Appointee
Steve Ruble (full member as of 7/17/02) Alternate Citizen at large
Eric Shoberg Southern Arizona Homebuilders Association
Andrew Shedlock(inactive as of June2002) Youth Representative, CDO High School
Pat Spoerl Citizen at large
Charles Walton Senior Representative
Allen Weinstein Council Member Rochman Appointee
Mike Wilson Parks & Recreation Advisory Board Appointee
Joe Winfield Vice Mayor LaSala Appointee
TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE
EXTERNAL AGENCY REPRESENTATIVES AGENCY
Sherry Barrett, Assistant Field Supervisor U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Dr. Barbara Becker, Director University of Arizona School of Planning
Mike Borens U.S. Forest Service, Coronado National Forest
iv
Oro Valley General Plan
Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005)
Ben Changkakoti, Principal Planner Pima County
AndyGunning, RegionalPlanning
Manager Pima Association of Governments
Judy
Imhoff Amphitheater School District
Jan Johnson (replaced Kenneth Conrad) Catalina Council
Jim Mazzocco, Planning Official Pima County
SherryRuther, Habitat Specialist Arizona Game & Fish
p
Joel Shapiro, Planning & Zoning Director Town of Marana
Carolee Sherwood (replaced Dennis Cady) Pinal County
Jack Siry,, Assistant Planning Director City of Tucson
Debra Sydenham, Community Planning Manager Arizona Department of Commerce
Y
Gordon g
Taylor, Manager, Planning Section Arizona State Land Department
TOWN STAFF REPRESENTATIVES TOWN DEPARTMENT
Alan Forrest, Water Utility Director Oro Valley Water Utility
Billg
J ansen, Town Engineer Oro Valley Public Works
Bob Kovitz, Public Information Officer Oro Valley Town Manager
Ainsley Reeder, Parks & Recreation Administrator Oro Valley Parks and Recreation
Brent Sinclair, Community Development Director Oro Valley Naranja Town Site
Sgt. Chuck Trujillo Oro Valley Police Department
Jeff Weir, Economic Development Administrator Oro Valley Economic Development
TOWN COMMITTEES AND BOARDS
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS
Cindy Lewis, Chair STORMWATER UTILITY COMMISSION
Bill Adler, Vice-Chair Nick Bokaie
Lyra Done Richard Hawkinson
Colleen Kessler Leann O'Brian
Bart Schannep Ralph Stein
Thomas Waddell
BUDGET AND BOND COMMITTEE
Lyra Done, Chair
Andrew Masterman, Vice-Chair
Bob Jennens
Honey Pivirotto
Robert Schlichting
PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD
Doug White, Chair
Mike Wilson, Vice Chair
Joel Brault
Laura Clark
Thomas Honebrink
John Russell
Jody Sinding
v
Policy Document
Adopted May29, 2003 (revised MayOro Valley General Plan
20, 2005)
ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE LANDS PUBLIC Karen Baker
ADVISORY COMMITTEE Stanley Bingham
Bill Adler Charles LeForge
g
Carl Boswell Rosemary Minter
Mette Brogden Sally Sanders
John Brooks Joseph Winfield
Gary Chandler
Hector Conde TRANSIT TASK FORCE
Patty Estes Tom Bozich
John Hickey Jerry Bustamante
Bob lannarino Carol Ellis
Ken Kinared Gregg Forszt
Fran La Sala Betty Goldberg
Mark Lewis Ron Gonzales
Dick Maes Robyn Hamilton
Nancy Mager Larry Howell
Kevin McHugh Dick Izen
Joe Murry Bill Matsukado
Louise Renneckar Nate Peterson
Karen Rogers Aimee Ramsey
Bob Toperzer John Russell
Richard Underwood Diane Seifried
Joe Winfield
TRAILS TASK FORCE Mike Skilsky
Bill Adler Chuck Walton
TOWN PROJECT STAFF
Melissa Shaw, AICP, Planner II, Project Manager
Bryant Nodine, AICP, Planning and Zoning Administrator
Tom Keiran, Planner
Laura Pinnas, GIS Analyst
Raul Duato, GIS Analyst and Cover Designer
Cat Strong and Kristi Kurry, Recording Secretaries
PROJECT PLANNING CONSULTANTS
BRW, Inc.
Bob Lagomarsino, AICP, Project Manager
Brian Sands, AICP, Deputy Project Manager
Celeste Werner, AICP
Dan Marum
Matthew Morris
Arlan Colton, AICP
....._..........
vi
Policy Document
Oro Valley General Plan
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005)
Novak Environmental
Karen Novak
DeAnne Rietz
Soley Snyder
i
•
a
a
ti
Oro Valley General Plan
Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20,2005)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PREAMBLE
ORO VALLEY'S VISION FOR THE FUTURE �
COMMUNITY VALUES
III
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
LIST OF FIGURES XI
LIST OF TABLES XI
INTRODUCTION 1
Regional Context 1
Planning Area 1
Project Background/Process 2
What is a General Plan? 2
Why Update the Existing Plan? 2
General Plan Update Process 7
Growing Smarter/Plus Framework 8
Administration of the Plan 9
Updating the Plan 9
Amending the Plan 10
Project Conformance with Plan 13
Strategic Implementation Program 14
Organization and Content of Plan Document 15
Statement 15
Growing Smarter/Plus Requirements 15
Key Policy Issues 15
Goals and Policies 15
Other Element Contents 16
Associated Documents 16
1. LAND USE 17
Statement 1 7
Growing Smarter/Plus Requirements 1 7
Key Policy Issues 1$
Preservation of the Sonoran Desert/Maintenance of Connected Natural Open Space 18
Maintaining Low-Density Character while Permitting Diversity of Development Types 18
Zoning Entitlements 1$
Revenue Enhancement 1 8
Community Identity 19
Goals and Policies 1 9
� Table of Contents
Policy Document
Adopted May 29,2003 (revised May 2Q Oro Valley General Plan
Y y ,2QQ5)
Preservation of Sonoran Desert/Maintenance of Connected Natural open space 19
Community Identity
20
Development Diversity
20
General Land Use
20
Land Use and Air Quality
21
Land Use Map
22
Land Use Standards
22
Land Use Designations
23
Back-Up Designations
26
Growth Areas
26
Urban Services Boundary
26
Special Area Policies
esvas
26
Land Use Map
29
2. COMMUNITY DESIGN
33
Statement
33
Growing Smarter/Plus Requirements
33
Key Policy Issues
33
Design Guidelines
33
Site Planning .�
33
Signage
33
Lighting
33
Goals and Policies - »
34
Built Environment
34
Solar Design
35
Lighting
35
3. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
37
Statement
37
Growing Smarter/Plus Requirements
37
Key Policy Issues
37
Diversification of the Economy
37
Retail Development/Leakage
37
Job Creation
37
Revenue Generation
37
Goals and Policies
38
Economic Sustainability
38
4. COST OF DEVELOPMENT
41
Statement
41
Growing Smarter/Plus Requirements 04
1
1
'
41
Key Policy Issues .
41
Table of Contents vi
Oro ValleyGeneral Plan Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005)
Compliance with Growing Smarter/Plus 41
p
Goals and Policies 41
Fair Share Allocation of Costs 41
Funding Mechanisms 42
Service and Financial Analysis 43
5. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION 45
Statement 45
Growing Smarter/Plus Requirements 45
sow
Key Policy Issues 45
Safety and Drainage Improvements 45
Regional RoadwayFunding 46
g
Dependencyon Automobile 46
Roadway Design n Capacity/Efficiency 46
Cut-Through Traffic/Neighborhood Preservation 46
North-South Arterials 46
East-West Arterials 47
Goals and Policies 47
Traffic Safety, Convenience, and Efficiency 47
Transportation Finance 48
Transportation Efficiency 48
Transportation and the Environment 48
Transit Services Restructuring 49
Multi-Modal Transportation 49
Expansion of Transit Services 49
Transit Connectivity 50
Bic clin 50
Y g
Circulation Map and Standards 51
6. PUBLIC FACILITIES,SERVICES,AND SAFETY 55
Statement 55
Growing Smarter/Plus Requirements 55
Key Policy Issues 55
Town Services 55
Schools 55
Crime-Free Community 56
Fire Protection and Emergency Response 56
Facility Planning 56
Facility Maintenance
56
Library Funding 56
Goals and Policies 56
vii Table of Contents
Policy Document
Oro Valley General Plan
Adopted May 29, 2003(revised May 20, 2005)
General Public Facilities and Services
56
Schoolsime
57
Library
58
Safety
58
7. HOUSING
59
Statement
59
Growing Smarter/Plus Requirements
59
Key Policy Issues
59
Neighborhood Quality
59
Range of Housing Opportunities 59
1111
Goals and Policies
60
High Quality Neighborhoods
60
Range of Opportunity 60 „t
Jobs-Housing Balance
60
8. PARKS AND RECREATION
63
Statement
63
Growing Smarter/Plus Requirements
63
Key Policy Issues
63
Parks and Recreation Facilities and Activities
63
Schools and Community Recreation
64
Small, Dispersed System of Recreation Areas
64
Parks and Open Space Funding
64
Naranja Town Site 64
Catalina State Park 64
Goals and Policies
67
General 67
Linkages 67
Developed Parks and Recreational Facilities 67
Access to Natural Resource Areas 68
Trails and Pathways 68
Joint-Use Opportunities 68
9. ARTS AND CULTURE 70
Statement 70
Growing Smarter/Plus Requirements 70
Key Policy Issues
70
Arts as a Bridge 70
Partnerships 70
Improved Communication . ►
70
Accessibility to Arts Instruction 70
Table of Contents viii
Oro Valley General Plan
Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005)
Goals and Policies
70
Arts and Culture
70
10. ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORIC RESOURCES 72
Statement 72
rter Plus
Growing Smarter/Plus Requirements 72/
Key Policy Issues
72
Archaeological ical and Historical Resource Protection 72
Interpretive Elements 72
Housing Archaeological Activities 72
Goals and Policies 72
Cultural and Historic Resource Protection 72
Educating and Enriching the Community 73
11. OPEN SPACE AND NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION 75
Statement 75
Growing Smarter/Plus Requirements 75
Key Policy Issues 76
Open Space S ace Tools 76
Funding AcquisitionOpen of O en Space Lands 76
Connectivity between Natural Open Space Areas and Recreational Areas 76
Loss, g
Degradation, and Fragmentation of Biological Resources 76
Restoration of Degraded Habitat 77
Plants and Animals 77
Increases in Light and Glare 77
Visual Character of the Community 77
Built Environment 77
Scenic Corridors 77
Air 77
Quality
Goals and Policies 78
..,
Natural Open Space 78
Habitat Protection 79
Visual Resources 81
Visually Important Areas 82
Program Development 83
g p
12. WATER RESOURCES 85
Statement 85
r. Growing Smarter/Plus Requirements 85
Key Policy Issues 85
Impacts to the Natural Drainage Recharge System 85
ix Table of Contents
Policy Document
Adopted May29, 2003 (revised MayOro Valley General Plan
20, 2005)
Protection of Wellheads
85
Water Conservation
85
Surface Water Availability/Transmission
85
Use of Reclaimed Water for Irrigation
86
Goals and Policies
86
Water Resource Preservation
86
Alternative Water Supplies
86
Water Resource Conservation
87
13. ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING
89
Growing Smarter/Plus Requirements
89
General Plan Policy Approach to Mitigating Environmental Issues
89
Air Quality
89
Water Quality
90
Natural Resources
90
GLOSSARY
91
SUPPLEMENTAL REPORTS AND DOCUMENTATION
94
Public Participation Action Plan
94
General Plan Background Report p 94
Fiscal Model Summary
94
Future Search Conference Summary
95
Focus Group Meetings Summary
95
Table of Contents X
Oro Valley General Plan Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005)
LIST OF FIGURES
ValleyVicinity Map3
Figure 1. 0
2: Town of Oro Valley y Limits and Planning Area 5
3: Land Use Map31
Figure
Figure 4: Trans ortation/Circulation Element Map 53
Figure 5: Parks and Recreation 65
„ LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: General Plan Amendment Matrix 11
Table 2: PlanningArea Land Use Designations and Acreage Distribution 29
Table 3: Circulation Map Classifications and Standards 51
X, Table of Contents
Policy Document Oro Valley General Plan
Adopted May 29, 2003(revised May 20, 2005)
1.0
Table of Contents xii
iiimmit
Oro Valley General Plan
Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005)
INTRODUCTION
REGIONAL CONTEXT
located
The Town of Oro
Valleyis approximatelysix miles north of Tucson, Arizona, as shown in
ppy
Figure 1. This places it approximately 110 miles southeast of Phoenix, the Arizona capital, and 75
miles north of the United States-Mexico border.
Oro Valley V lle is situated in the northeastern corner of Pima County and is near the southeastern corner
of Pinal County. The
Town lies between the Santa Catalina Mountains to the east and the Tortolita
Mountains to the northwest. The Coronado National Forest makes up much of the Town's eastern
boundary. In addition to Tucson, the second largest city in Arizona, other nearby communities
include the Town of Marana to the west and the unincorporated community of Catalina to the north.
Major
regional infrastructure near Oro Valleyincludes Interstate 10 (1-10), located approximately 12
miles Valley,s west of Oro Valle which runs between Tucson and Phoenix, as well as linking major cities
further east and west. The Union Pacific Railroad parallels 1-10 and provides similar links.
There are two major roadways serving Oro Valley. Oracle Road, also known as State Route 77, runs
Y
north-south through Oro Valley and is the old road/highway linking Tucson and Phoenix. Tangerine
Road runs west from Oracle Road, linking Oro Valley with 1-10.
PLANNING AREA
The PlanningArea for the General Plan Update includes the area within the Town limits as well as
p
land outside the Town's current limits that may be annexed to the Town as it develops (see Figure 2).
The PlanningArea also includes land adjacent to the Town that may be affected by or may affect
�
land uses in the Town, such as National Forest land, that the Town has no plans to annex. The
Town's incorporated area (i.e., the area within its limits) was approximately 33 square miles as of
preparationPlanning of this document. The Pling Area covers approximately 70 square miles and has the
following boundaries:
• North: The border between Pima County and Pinal County
• South: Mainly along Ina Road as well as along North Christie Road
• West: Mainly along North Shannon Road
• East: Generally includes all of Catalina State Park and a portion of west Coronado National
Forest
In addition to considering the Planning Area, the General Plan addresses parts or all of communities
adjoiningor surroundingthe Town that may affect the Town's development. Where information is
relevant and available, it will bep rovided for comparison with the Town. Such communities include
g p
neighboring municipalities, such as Tucson and Marana. In addition, for reference purposes and to
g
aid in the identification of larger trends in terms of demographics and economics, information has
also been
provided for largergeographic areas, such as Pima County, the State of Arizona, and the
United States.
I
ii
1 Introduction
Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised Ma Y 20. 200,x) Oro Valley General Plan
PROJECT BACKGROUND/PROCESS
WHAT IS A GENERAL PLAN?
A general plan is essentially a community's "blueprint" for land use
i p and development; it serves as
the basis s for rational decisions regarding a community's long-term development.g The general plan
expresses the community's development goals and embodieso
ublic policy p y r elative to the distribution
of future land uses, both public and .rivateThepolicies and
pprograms of the general plan are
intended to underlie most land use decisions. Preparing, implementing, and maintaining a
general plan serves to:
• Identify the community's land use, transportation, environmental, economic,nom ic, and social goals
and policies as they relate to land use and development.
• Provide a basis for local government decision-making, includingdecisions on development
approvals.
• Provide residents with opportunities to participate in thelanninand decision g making
processes of their community.
• Inform residents, developers, decision makers, and other cities and counties
of the ground
rules that guide development within the community.
Y
A general plan typically has three defining qualities:
General Nature: As its name suggests, the general plan provides guidance for the future, particularly
regarding growth and development. More precise direction is provided in implementation
documents and plans, such as annexations, the zoningdesi n regulations,code, g g ns, the annual budget,
and the capital improvements program.
Comprehensive Scope: The general plan addresses a broad range of environmental,ental, social, and
economic factors affecting change within the community. These factors include land d use and
circulation, the environment and resources, economic and fiscal conditions, as
well as a host of
others. Furthermore, these factors are addressed in an interrelated and wherever
possible, consistent
manner.
Long-Range: The general plan takes immediate concerns into consideration, but focuses primarily on
the future, particularly potential build out scenarios (i.e., the maximum size and population of the
community).
As described below, according to the State of Arizona's Growing Smarter/Plus statutes, ev
ery city and
county in Arizona is required to adopt and maintain a generalp lan.
WHY UPDATE THE EXISTING PLAN?
In deciding to update the Town's 1996 General Plan, the Town had two compelling i n
p g motivations. The
first was the growth and change that the communityhad experienced. Oro Valley's ey s population had
nearly quadrupled from 6,670 in 1990 to 29,700 in 2000, fundamentallychangingTown's
the Town s
landscape. The update provided the community with an opportunity to re-examine ne the basic policy
commitments made in 1996 to determine if they still address the needs of the community, well
as as
to improve some of the technical aspects of the general plan.
The second reason that the Town chose to update the 1996 Plan was to address its obligation to
comply with the requirements of the State's GrowingSmarter/Plus statutes. These
discussed "Growing requirements are
in detail under Growing Smarter/Plus Framework" below.
Introduction 2
I"( • 1r
""*IIIIPP' 1
'-fer"4
( �E
` 0
-,.i.-.
., , a.
co
2 'p O N Oco
.... ,
E �° c
4 •
* 1 41=
L;;,‘ O� EL 76 c Z
1 • C co-a aaiNi cu it.,, e-
1 Ecco cm0 o d
• V
O N
1 ; " 3 m cC C c 0 C =
'c N
\''\'' 7
1..- I • N 5 Q t. ?. ,:f_ `,,
. ; V •
( ' n �W E o
E . e 6:\
jA s of o
I
o
• 4
t
I
.',\ , L....:.1..,_i„.....„.. . i
_ \,
\\•,‘, t I • •
1 ‘‘ ...
\,. ,..
\\ .
‘, O
111P 1
t
3
I ., ,,,...,,,•;,--,...-,- t l'....
�/ M
, *; Iffer , t' I' ,
r \ ,.
z ,r
. ,....,,..4„,
�_ •
2:',
•
• ro
i.nri.I. ....
O .
..." i ....:11-:' '.sr
/ t
alb, ,M,i
IP Q ® 1 _-
• le71.//o4,04.‘,..I
■. 1 >.
C5
✓ I-1D }. N o �
LJJ
N
I 0 .J
JCD
it I 4.4
Q CU
W
Q
LL a
LU( ;Feu S
0 CL (to, z -/,17,....- . to 1
t ;
t1,r N
CD
I .
C
H
CD o
0
41
F" i
CD
L. c
.o 0 CZ
0) c3 N� m (
CO •� �� �> o
Md O� >
�ao oO c C as NE cn o
°y�" , c� oNQwoco , n a)
o ® FL (1 ' � og ;,N g
N COLUMBUS BL W
m w o o ; Q •
2 � a f° u
z Q _ W0 Q)(f) as_>
0 CG Q Q Z ' 0 4 E11.1 E N 2
Lu w w $ .;
c rCn E LEE E v)SO
w 1.?i.'4*'.-; /,. o 8z i 4 J
w
A
- 1;E .. ... ,..,:
fi
ate"V
�,.
a I•-
L cc
. 0• a
. . Q
•
•
O
•
. QZ g
H, r W Z 00 <JO
<
* U OOQ Zzz
O
. ZV O mcc cc Z
a < OUO
1d O U HE
•
. ''-' "t3 2, L L I z c ___________ _ __
!......:.__.., :E c Q 2
�C
O N C C
.," C
Ca
Esc- ---,...,:,,,C.,•:33..,
Sao-c�:ns:,as�� ro ro 0-
/ a) ,e O 1) cz
v n-
t1) •,..-E" i •±1 2 g
11
r E O N (n tv a Y.
_ O c2 _ cD
• E ul t — c`f; 75
•
b' c7 :� IL a.. cf) a. 2 ` O O a_
L
•
-- �1• 1
''t � CV
• : 8 W
D ,J N N
J W
Q
I____ . i > 430
z pC __,A,„.._.4,
r
,,, o c . ,r . ,_.
1i$
ry
RS
I 0 Et
In
ZC/I 0
CD
0 o
H
f
Oro Valley General Plan Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005)
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE PROCESS
p
To accomplish
a successful update, the Town Council selected a project team consisting of Town
staff, the General
Plan SteeringCommittee, and a team of planning consultants. The 21-member
Steering
Committee, consistingof Town residents appointed by the Town Council, guided the
process,
u date with Town staff and the consultants providing technical expertise and assistance.
p
The processof the General Plan Update had numerous individual components, which can be
p
grouped into the following four major steps:
Step 1: Information Gathering and Issue Identification
Step 2: Alternatives Development and Selection
Step 3: General Plan Element Preparation
Step 4: Council Adoption and Voter Ratification
Background Report and Future Search Conference
The first step of the General Plan Update process, Information Gathering and Issue Identification,
involved thep rep aration of a Background Report. The report built upon the information contained in the 1996 General Plan, updating it and providing additional information where appropriate. The
intent of the provide ort is to the residents of Oro Valley, as well as Town leaders and staff, with
as much information asp ossible on the Town's current conditions, outstanding issues, and probable
future trends.
of the Background Report, theproject the development g p team organized a Future Search
Conference in which approximately 150 citizens helped to define the community's vision.
Information from this and other elements of the public participation program are presented in the
Supplemental Reports and Documents section of this report.
Land Use Alternatives and the Fiscal Model
Following completion of the first phase, the project team defined alternatives for the future
developmentValley of Oro and created a fiscal model to evaluate the long-term revenues and
expenditures related to each land use scenario. A preferred alternative for the future development of
the Town was chosen based on the results of this model and an extensive community outreach
processGroup
that included Focus meetings, an Open House, and numerous meetings of the
Steering Committee.
Document Preparation and Adoption
The community outreach was also used to create the General Plan Elements. The results of Future
Search conference and the 1996 General Plan were used to create issues, goals and policies, which
were presented to the public and modified during the Focus Group Meetings.
Following preparation of the Draft General Plan, the Plan was submitted for 60-day review by the
public, the State, and affected jurisdictions. Over 900 comments were received and considered by
the Steering Committee. In November, the Steering Committee's draft was revised and
recommended for appby the Town's Planning and Zoning Commission. The Town Council
then held a study session, a series of six special sessions, and three public hearings on the map and
plan. these meetings With the results of these s and a positive fiscal analysis using the fiscal impact model,
the Council
the adopted plan in June 2003 with a super-majority (four of five Council Members).
p
... ...._...___....... .
...._._....._...
7 Introduction
Policy Document Oro Valley General Plan
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005)
Lastly, in November 2003, the Plan was submitted to the Town's voters for ratification by a majority
of the registered voters participating in that election.
GROWING SMARTER/PLUS FRAMEWORK
One of the Town's main objectives in updating Focus 2020 was to bringtheTown
into compliance
with new requirements for comprehensive planning passed by the State Legislature stature since the
adoption of the Town's existing General Plan (i.e., Focus 2020). The first major
� legislation was
adopted in 1998, when the State enacted "Growing Smarter" statutes that established a series of new
requirements for the preparation and adoption of generallans. These requirements were further
q
refined in 2000, when the legislature enacted statutes to address additional substantive and
scheduling issues. The 1998 Growing Smarter requirements combined with the 2000 refinements ements are
known collectively as "Growing Smarter/Plus." Three aspects of the new Growing g Smarter/Plus
requirements were particularly important to Oro Valley's General Plan Update.
New Elements
The first new requirement was the necessity for the updatedgeneralplan to address new
p e subject
areas, or "elements." For communities with over 2,500 and fewer than 50,000 residents, including
Oro Valley, the Arizona Revised Statutes (ARS) established the requirement for the preparation and
adoption of at least six elements: land use, circulation, ace open sgrowth area, environmental
p to I
planning, and cost of development. Growing Smarter/Plus also established the option for smaller
alter
communities to prepare some or all of the additional eight elements g
required of larger communities
(i.e., over 50,000). These are as follows: conservation; recreation; ublic services and facilities;
p ,
public buildings; housing; conservation, rehabilitation and et •ment;redevelo safety; and bicycling.
p � Y� The
Town's 1996 General Plan (Focus 2020) contained ten elements, as shown in the table below. Thus,
according to State law, in updating the Plan Oro Valley was obliged to address four new element
requirements (growth area, environmental planning, cost of development, and water resources),
),
although some of the existing elements did address some of the substantive requirements q of the
environmental planning and water resources elements. Under anycircumstances, the Town faced
the challenge of updating the general plan to ensure consistency and balance among the elements—
and nts—
and in particular between the existing and new elements.
2001 General Plan Update Elements 1996 General Plan Elements
• Land Use (including Growth Areas) • Land Use
• Community Design • Community Design
• Economic Development • Economic Development
• Cost of Development No Corresponding Element
• Transportation/Circulation ■ Circulation/Transportation
• Public Facilities, Services, and Safety • Public Facilities and Services
■ Safety
• Housing • Housing
• Parks and Recreation • Parks, Open Space, and Recreation
• Arts and Culture • Cultural and Historical Resources
• Archaeological and Historical Resources • Cultural and Historical Resources
• Open Space and Natural Resource Conservation • Parks, Open Space, and Recreation
■ Natural Resource Conservation
• Water Resources No Corresponding Element
• Environmental Planning No Corresponding Element
Introduction 8
I
Oro Valley General Plan Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005)
Public Participation
The second new requirementGrowing
established bySmarter/Plus relates to public participation.
The updated statutes require that Arizona's towns, cities, and counties ensure thorough community
the preparation of their general plans. The Town of Oro Valley made a serious
involvement in p p
commitment to that involvementg preparation through the of its General Plan Update 2001 Public
Plan outlined a broad
Participation Action Plan. The range of outreach tools and mechanisms to be
Yo
emp ted to engage the Town's key stakeholders in the update process.
Popular Ratification
The third major new
requirement of GrowingSmarter/Plus is very closely related to the new public
It is the requirement that new general plans or major involvement requirements. or general plan q
updates be subjected to a popular vote for ratification. This new requirement, which is unique in the
majorityof the voters participating in the election to approve the general
United States, requires a p p g
planpproveplacement that is approved for on the ballot by the Town Council.
ADMINISTRATION OF THE PLAN
The Town of Oro Valley
intends this Plan be followed and consistently applied unless and until
conditions in thehave changed communitychan ed to the extent that the Plan requires amendment or
modification. When conditions warrant that the Plan be modified, such amendments are subject to
the process and approval set forth in the Plan according to Arizona law and the Town of Oro Valley
amendment processp y
Res onsi bi l it for administration of the Plan is shared by the Town Staff,
Department,Planning and ZoningPlanningand Zoning Commission, Town Council, and Town
section describes theprocess and procedures that are to be utilized when updating,
Citizens. This
amending and implementing the General Plan.
UPDATING THE PLAN
Update is the adoption of or
A General Plan re-adoption of one or more elements of the General p
Plan pursuant to
Arizona Revised Statutes (ARS) §9-461.06L. The adoption or re-adoption of the
ppby
General Plan must
be approved an affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the members of the
Town Council and ratified by the voters pursuant to ARS §9-461.06L.
Frequency and Public Participation
The Growing Smarter/Plus require that the General Plan be updated and ratified by the
/ us statutes
Oro Valleyat least once everyten years, but due to changing conditions, the Town has
residents of O o
decided to updateevery years General Plan five using the current General Plan as a point of
departure. The periodic eriodic review of the General Plan's progress referenced in the Strategic
Implementation Program will be used for the update.
The update evaluating
process will start bythe effectiveness of current General Plan in meeting all
community goals and determining necessary modifications. All General Plan updates are subject to
the public participation proceduresadoptedby Town Council, as may be amended by resolution,
according to ARS §9-461.06L.
Zoning Conformance with the General Plan
During each update process, an analysis of zoning as it conforms to the General Plan will be
y
performed to assess the status of parcels with zoning that does not conform.
9 Introduction
Policy Document Oro Valley General Plan
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005)
AMENDING THE PLAN
For the purposes of this Plan, an amendment is anyhe that occurs between
change the scheduled Plan
updates. Such amendments may involve a change to the Land Use Mapfor or s pecific properties or a
change to the text within an existing element of the Plan.
Each element of the Oro Valley General Plan includes an overarching statement that was created
based upon prevailing needs, existing developmentpattern, underlying p y g z oning classifications,
considerations for man-made constraints, natural constraints, environmentally sensitive lands,
opportunities for development, accepted planning practices, and considerable input.ublic Over O er a
period of time, these variables are subject to change. Consequently, the General Plan must
periodically be reviewed and amended to ensure that it remains an effectiveolic guide.
Y g e.
Amendments to the General Plan should never be allowed to occur in a haphazard p d manner.
Amendments to the General Plan should only occur after careful review of the request, finding-q
of
fact-
(see Adoption of Amendment__below), and public hearing(s) by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and Town Council. The statutory requirements for the adoption of the
shall p General Plan
be followed for all amendments as they pertain topublic hearings and otherwise.
g
Types of Amendments to the Plan
General Plan amendments may be classified as either "major" or "minor" amendments. Generally,
amendments to the Plan will be changes to the Land Use Map. However, the same amendment
dment
procedure is to be utilized when processing a text amendment.
Major Amendment. The Arizona Revised Statutes define a Major Amendment as "a substantial
alteration of the municipality's land use mixture or balance as established in the existing g general plan
land use element." Oro Valley defines a Major Amendment as anychange to the Land
Use Map that
meets one or more of the following criteria:
1. All amendments beyond the Urban Services Boundary (USB) will be major amendments.
a majo-r amendment.
3-2. _ All other amendments will be determined based on Table 1, the General Plan
Amendment Matix.
Introduction 10
Oro Valley General
Plan Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005)
Table 1: General Plan Amendment Matrix
Proposed Designation (Change To)
Existing Designation." PSP&
(Change From) R-LDR LDR1 LDR2 MDR HDR MPC RGC NCO CRC COP SCH .PARK OS
R-LDR
■ ■ ■ ■ : ' : : : .
LDR2 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■
MDR ■ ■ ■ ■ ■
HDR ><. • _ • 1 1
MPC2 See footnote#2 below
■ _ ■ ■ ■ ■ • ■ 1
RGC ■
NCO ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ _ =` ■
CRC ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ •
COP • ■ � •.
PSP and SCH3 ■
PARK ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■
><
OS ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■
><
Major Amendment ■
Minor Amendment
No Amendment ><
Notes:
1. For a complete definition of the land use designations, please refer to page 23.
2. Amendments to areas designated as MPC will be treated, per the General Plan Amendment Matrix Table, based
on the land use and density of the MPC designation. If no specific land uses and densities are called out for the
MPC (see Special Area Policies starting on page 26), it will be treated, for the purpose of an amendment only, as
MDR and NCO (no more than 10%).
3. Excluding Public Schools. Public schools are not subject to the amendment process.
4. See Special Area Policies starting on page 26.
Minor Amendment. A minor amendment is defined as any text or map change that does not meet
the criteria for a major amendment. Additional criteria for a minor amendment include:
1. All amendments that are five acres or less in size and that are contiguous to like existing land
use categories will be minor amendments.
C • - --- - - - - - •- . ; :- •- 44.-^' - 4' e :• " •; • a•• • • •4,
eb
•
.2. All amendments to the Land Use Map to bring its designations into conformity with
either existing land uses or Pima County zoning at the time of the annexation to the Town of
Oro Valley will be minor amendments.
Exceptions. The following circumstances shall be handled administratively and shall not require a
p
formal amendment to the General Plan.
1. All scriveners' errors will be subject to administrative approval.
11 Introduction
Policy Document
Adopted May29, 2003 (revised MayOro Valley General Plan
20, 2005)
2. Other corrections to the text or map will not be treated as General Plan amendments but will
require Town Council approval.
Procedures for Amending the Plan
Amendments to the Oro Valley General Plan maybe initiated bythe Town
or by a landowner. Such
amendments must be in accordance with the rocedures set forth in the
p Arizona Revised Statutes
and the Town of Oro Valley Zoning Code. Arizona State Law requires i res tha
q tall municipalities provide
public review of General Plan amendments. All General Plan amendments will follow the additional
public notification requirements listed below. All minor and major amendments to the General Plan
shall follow1
the procedures outlined in the following flow diagram:
Submittal Application submitted during an
approved submittal window.
•
Yes I Major? ► No
T
Neighborhood Meeting Public ►
Notification
V T
P&Z Hearing ► Neighborhood Meeting
/iv
Provides a recommendation — P&Z Hearing
to TC
� T
Town Council Hearing
Minor Amendment Procedure. To coordinate the review of amendments to the General
Plan, minor
amendments may only be submitted during two, two-montheriods of the yyear. They must include
at least one neighborhood meeting early in therocess for all changes to the Land
pUse Map.
Major Amendment Procedure. Major Amendments:
• May only be submitted at one time during the year;
• Must go to two public hearings by the Planning and Zoning Commission (in different
locations);
• Shall include two neighborhood meetings, one prior to the Planning Commission and
one
prior to the Town Council;
• Must be presented to the Council at a single public hearingduringthe calendaryear that
proposal is made; and
the
• Must be adopted by a two-thirds vote of the Town Council.
Text amendments may not require neighborhood meetings.
Public Notification. Major amendments will include a public involvement program
consistent with
state statutes. In addition, public notification for all General Plan amendments will be as follows:
Introduction 12
imommow
Oro ValleyGeneral Plan Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005)
■ Notice ofthe proposed amendment will be advertised a minimum of two times in two widely
distributed newspapers.
C . property owners within 1 000 feet of the subject property and all adjoining properties will
Allpop y ,
be directly notified of the amendment.
• All Homeowners Associations (as listed in the Town HOA database) will be notified of the
amendment.
• Signs noticing the proposed amendment will be posted on the property on a sign or signs
3'x4' in size, with white background and 5-inch letters.
..
Adoption of Amendment. The disposition of the General Plan amendment proposed shall be based
bo
on consistency__with the vision, goals and_ policies_ of the General Plani_with special emphasis
onmecting all of -- ; = •••-;
1. The ro _osed cha,n e_is_msusta;i.n_able ;b con_tributin to the socio-economic betterment of__the
Community,_while achieving community and environmental compatibilityThc amendment, in
• r • r-• . - =• -4. • . - ••• and,
Plan; and,
2. The ro osed _change reflects market demand which leads to assure viability and_ general
community acce tancej and,
3. The amendment will_,not_.adverse_l_ ___im _act the community as a whole :Wor a portion of the
community n it-y without an acceptable means_rvof mitigating hese__m pacts;th rough_the s_usec tient
zoning :and_ development_.,..processes -- --• - • -•- • - •
The applicant for the amendment shall have the burden of presenting facts and other materials to
+� support these conclusions by clear and convincing proof.
PROJECT CONFORMANCE WITH PLAN
Arizona State Law requires that zoning be in conformance with the General Plan. ARS Section §9-
rat
462.01F defines conformance as follows: "a rezoning ordinance conforms with the land use element
of thegeneralplan if it proposes land uses, densities or intensities within the range of identified uses,
densities and intensities of the land use element of the general plan." All rezoning proposals and
development projects shall be evaluated for conformance with the Plan.
Rezoning Conformance
Per the Town's zoningcode, "[a]n new proposal for development, which does not comply [with the
y
General Plan], will be subject to denial by the Town Council." Thus, new development proposals
O• must match the land use map in accordance with the Town's zoning code and the requirements of
16. the State statute referenced above.
Further, the Growing Smarter Acts, as noted by the Arizona Department of Commerce Community
Planning Program, require that "all rezoning ordinances and regulations adopted shall not only be
q
consistent with, but must conform to the adopted General Plan. The rezoning ordinance shall further
the implementation of, and not be contrary to, the goals, policies, and applicable elements of the
�► p
Plan. A rezoning ordinance conforms to the Land Use Element if it proposes land uses, densities or
intensities within the range for the subject property as stated in the General Plan." To this end,
13 Introduction
Policy Document Oro Valley General Plan
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005)
proposals for zoning change should be evaluated in relation to all of theolicies in
p the General Plan
(not just the map and those in the Land Use Element). When aro osed zoning mit
p p change is not in
compliance, the applicant will be required to amend the General Plan, or the
proposal, prior to
initiating a rezoning.
Development Review
General Plan conformance shall also be used as a criterion in thea approval or denial
pp of other types of
development proposals, such as development plans, lats, and architecture. When
p considering a
development proposal, Town staff, the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Development Review
Board, and the Town Council will evaluate the
it
proposal as
to how relates to the key y concepts in
the General Plan. It is the burden of the applicant to provide clear and convincingproof, through an
analysis of each applicable policy, that the proposal is in conformance with the General Plan.
STRATEGIC IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM
Arizona Revised Statutes (Section 9-461.07-A.2) require that, once the Plan is adopted and ratified,
,
the Town will, through its planning agency, annuallyprepareandprovide a report to
p the Town
Council on the status of the Plan and progress in its application. In addition to this annual report, the
e
Town has developed a Strategic Implementation Program (SIP) to implement the Plan which,
pas
described below, would include a periodic and more complete review of the Plan.
The SIP is a companion document to the General Plan, approved bythe Town Council, that
ppspecifies
action steps to be taken to implement the Plan. The purpose of developing the SIP as a separate
document is to institute a review of implementation progress. A reviewing committee will evaluate
the program and make recommendations to the Planning and Zoning Commission and Town
Council regarding potential changes to the Program. The Program may need to be changed based
on the Town's budget or changing conditions that were not anticipated when the SIP was prepared.
p
The SIP action items will directly relate to the Planning Commission's annual Work Plan and toh
to
Capital Improvements Program (CIP), as these programs implement the SIP action items. In this
manner the Work Plan and CIP will coordinate implementation of the General Plan. Responsible
Town departments identified in the SIP are to implement the Work Plan in the specific time frames
identified. The SIP may also be used during the CIP rocess to prioritize allocation of capital
pp tal
funding.
Schedule
The annual CIP process begins in September and ends in February, inpreparation of the Fiscal Year
Budget. The Work Plan is submitted each July, after budget approval. It is anticipated that the SIP
g pp p
review will take place in the second or third years between updates and willp recede the CIP
program in order to help prioritize and establish the long-term vision of the CIPg
pro ram. The SIP
review will also take place at the start of each update of the Plan. The review will serve as the annual
report required by state statute in the years in which it is performed
Procedure
A committee consisting of representatives from all Town Departments, a representative from Town
Council, all relevant Boards and Commissions, and citizen representatives will conduct the SIP
review. There will be a public participation component that will include workshops and an
popen
house to both inform residents in the progress and implementation of the General Plan and to utilize
public input to prioritize the SIP action items.
Introduction 14
Oro Valley General Plan Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003(revised May 20, 2005)
ORGANIZATION AND CONTENT OF PLAN DOCUMENT
This document is organized in a manner that allows it to address the statutory requirements of
Growing Smarter/Plus in a fashion that suits the unique circumstances of Oro Valley. Following this
Introduction, which sets the stage for the policy content of the General Plan, this document includes
13 elements that collectively address the Town's obligations for compliance with Growing
Smarter/Plus as well as addressing other issues that are of particular local importance. These elements
are as follows:
■ Land Use Element (including Growth Areas)
■ Community Design
• Economic Development
• Cost of Development
• Transportation/Circulation
• Public Facilities, Services, and Safety
• Housing
• Parks and Recreation
• Arts and Culture
• Cultural and Historical Resources
■ Open Space and Natural Resource Conservation
• Water Resources
• Environmental Planning
Each of these elements is divided into a series of sections, the first four of which are uniform among
the elements. The existing conditions related to each element, are included in the General Plan
presented as,
Background Report, under Associated Documents below. The sections are as follows:
STATEMENT
For each element, there is a "Statement" that declares the overall intent of the element as it relates to
the specific interests of Oro Valley. It outlines the Town's expectations for the future of Oro Valley as
it relates to the subject matter covered in the element.
GROWING SMARTER/PLUS REQUIREMENTS
no
This section simply summarizes the relevant Growing Smarter/Plus requirements for each element.
This includes explanations of what content is mandated for Oro Valley and what issues the Town has
decided to address that are either not required for communities of Oro Valley's size or are not
addressed at all by Growing Smarter/Plus.
KEY POLICY ISSUES
This section presents the key policy issues that each element addresses, as identified during the
General Plan Public Participation Process.
GOALS AND POLICIES
This section presents the basic policy content of each element, with a series of goals that are related
to key topics. Under each goal is a set of policies intended to guide achievement of that goal. Goals
and policies are defined as follows:
15 Introduction
Policy Document Oro ValleyGeneral Plan
Adopted May29, 2003 (revised May20,2005)
Goal
ultimate __ur ose_ofµan effort stated,_i_na wa �__that__is_ eneral_min_natureand immeasurabl .
• • Y..__ __ �__ mm_ __. _ e _Goals
are__not uanti table time-de endent_ or suggestive of s wec f c actions for achievement._There is at 3
east onegeneral- lan oal per element with more thaneone .oa!per element where a
pplppiate or
necessary. Goals often refer to one or_ mo
re_as co ai n r
_ _.._.� tsf thevision ecoorate �caficrvvalues.
They.are t i,calf_presented was,"to statements. -- w •--• :w ;; • ; - ;• -; •- .., •• -
•
; . .• :;•
;.
•
• • _- • - •_ • • _ ••• • 1 "` . ..••1 •+ • r • • • r _r • rr r r ••.w. • r r •• r r
„,,
•
•• _ •• r •r • • r r• r _ ► • • r r r• // r// -_r• •
3
Policy
Acourse of action that Town shall take implement the Oal to which iWlin :tctes'
relates
are followed a p�applied„ theY work to implement
nt the_community's/
s vision.....for The
future.• •_ • - - •- - - . • - -•
•
•
•• i •, 1 ;; • • --•r • ; • ;• • • •1 _r• i •1 1 - •• r •- •r ,r• - -•• • • 3
•
:; . .; • •.
•
; . . . .;
1 1 • • w
•
;; . .; ;. • • •••• •••:• .. ; .... . .;•••;
•:. : .
; "; . ... . . ;. ;
OTHER ELEMENT CONTENTS
In addition to the sections described above, the Land Use and Circulation/Transportation Elements
also include maps and associated standards. The Land Use Element includes the General Plan Land
Use Map along with descriptions of permitted uses and standards of density and intensity for all of
the designations that appear on the map. The Circulation Element includes a Circulation Element
Map that depicts roadway classifications.
Finally, the Land Use Element also includes a separate section addressingamendments to the
General
a Plan, with a particular focus on defining what constitutes a "major amendment" p er the
requirements of Growing Smarter/Plus.
ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTS
As part of the General Plan Update, several documents were prepared to support the development
pp p
of this Policy Document. This included the General Plan Background Report, which wasp ublished
separately and is available for review or purchase through the Town. The Background Report
g p
documents existing conditions and highlights findings relevant to land use, development, and
resource conservation. Also published separately as part of the General Plan Update were several
appendices that documented activities undertaken as part of the Updatep rocess. This includes a
summary of the Community Interest Survey, a summary of the results of a series of Town
representative interviews conducted early in the Update process, and summaries of the Open House
meetings that the Town conducted to gather public input at various stages during the process. These
appendices are also available through the Town.
It should be noted that these associated documents are not formally
as adopted part of the General
p
Plan, and thus are not subject to popular ratification. They are simply descriptive documentation of
relevant issues related to the General Plan and its preparation.
Introduction 16
Oro Valley General Plan Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005
1 . LAND USE
STATEMENT
The Oro Valley Planning Area will continue to project a residential/resort character where the living
environment for residents and visitors is emphasized. Orderly growth that focuses primarily on low-
density
developmentespecially is es ecially important to the community, as is development that is sensitive to
and compatible with the Sonoran Desert environment.
111 GROWING SMARTER/PLUS REQUIREMENTS
Accordingto the State's GrowingSmarter/Plus statutes, the land use element must accomplish the
following:
■ Designates the proposed general distribution and location and extent of such uses of the land
g p p
for housing, business, industry, agriculture, recreation, education, public buildings and
Or grounds, open space and other categories of public and private uses of land as may be
appropriate to the municipality.
■ Includes a statement of the standards of population density and building intensity
recommended for the various land use categories covered by the general plan.
■ Identifies specific programs and policies that the municipality may use to promote infill or
compact form development activity and locations where those development patterns should
im be encouraged.
• Includes consideration of air quality and access to incident solar energy for all general
categories of land use. (Note: Air quality issues are also addressed in the Open Space and
Natural Resources Conservation Element and solar access is addressed in the Community
Design Element.)
■ Includesp olicies that address maintaining a broad variety of land uses including the range of
uses existing in the municipality when the general plan is adopted, readopted or amended.
In addressing these requirements, the Land Use Element functions as a guide for Town officials (both
elected and appointed), the general public, the development community, and other interested
parties as to the ultimate pattern of development in Oro Valley. The Land Use Element has the
broadest scope of the elements mandated by Growing Smarter/Plus. It plays a central role in
it correlating all land use issues into a set of coherent development policies that relate directly to the
other
general plan elements. In practice, it is the most visible and often used element in the local
general plan.
In addition to establishing the Town's development policy in broad terms, the land use element plays
ap ivotal role in short-term zoning, subdivision, and public works decisions, providing a long-range
context for those short-term actions.
This Land Use Element also considers Growing Smarter/Plus' requirement for a Growth Areas
Element. According to the statutes, the general plan must accomplish the following:
Ca Identifies those areas, if any, that are particularly suitable for planned multimodal
transportation and infrastructure expansion and improvements designed to support a planned
concentration of a variety of uses, such as residential, office, commercial, tourism and
industrial uses.
17 Land Use
Policy Document Oro ValleyGeneral era)Plan
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005)
This element shall include policies and implementation strategies that are designed to:
g g
• Make automobile, transit and other multimodal circulation more efficient, make
infrastructure expansion more economical and provide for a rationalp attern of land
development.
■ Conserve significant natural resources and open space areas in theg rowth area and
coordinate their location to similar areas outside the growth area's boundaries. 1
• Promote the public and private construction of timely and financially sound infrastructure
expansion through the use of infrastructure funding and financial planning that is coordinated
with development activity.
The intent of the Growth Areas Element requirement is to have communities focus ono opportunities
es
for appropriate infill development, rather than continuingtopromote development on the edges p g s of
currently developed areas. It is essentially an effort to incorporate anti-sprawl policies into general
plans. As implied by the first major bulleted item above, the statutes do not mandate that every
community identify growth areas. Rather, communities have the discretion to determine if the
provisions apply locally.
KEY POLICY ISSUES
Through the course of preparing the General Plan, a wide varietyof land use and development issues
p
were addressed. Brief summaries of these Key Policy Issues are provided below.
PRESERVATION OF THE SONORAN DESERT/MAINTENANCE OF CONNECTED NATURAL OPEN SPACE
The preservation of the Sonoran Desert environment and maintenance of connected natural open
space are critical elements of the community's vision and cornerstones of the General Plan. It is
important that the Town balances the interests of private property owners with thep rotection of the
Sonoran Desert. Creating connectivity of natural open space of varying sizerovides habitat for
diversep
wildlife and shapes the overall form of the community. (This issue is also addressed in the
Open Space and Natural Resources Conservation Element.)
MAINTAINING LOW-DENSITY CHARACTER WHILE PERMITTING DIVERSITY OF DEVELOPMENT TYPES
Oro Valley residents value the low-density residential character of the Planning Area to provide
buffer zones and recreation areas and maintain natural topography and connected natural open
space. However, Oro Valley's predominant development pattern provides for large areas of
homogeneous housing separated from services and other types of p
housing. Some aspects of this
pattern of development are not conducive to pedestrian access to services, efficient infrastructure
investment, or diverse social interaction. In some cases, this development pattern could result in
increased environmental impacts, traffic congestion, monotony in residential subdivision design, and
strip development that is oriented to the automobile.
ZONING ENTITLEMENTS
A large amount of land within the Planning Area is entitled through current zoning. Thus, onlycertain
g
areas have potential for change through the Town's development review and approval process.
REVENUE ENHANCEMENT
The Town's economy (discussed further in the Economic Development Element) is currently fueled
by new construction, primarily residential development. In order for the Town to be self-sustaining
and weather the building cycles, it will need to diversify its economic base, balancing the Town's
Land Use 1 8 .V.
Oro Valley General Plan Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005
interest in maintaining its primarily rimaril low-density character with the need for financial stability and
infrastructure efficiency.
COMMUNITY IDENTITY
As areas are annexed to the Town, the distinction between Oro Valley and adjacent communities
may be blurred. New development and redevelopment in these areas will need to be directed if the
distinct character of Oro Valley's identity is to be maintained.
GOALS AND POLICIES
PRESERVATION OF SONORAN DESERT/MAINTENANCE OF CONNECTED NATURAL OPEN SPACE
1.1 To preserve Oro Valley's natural Sonoran Desert environment and the scenic resources
that are an important part of the community's quality of life. (See also Open Space and
Natural Resources Conservation Element.)
1.1.1 The_Town shall s romote clustering of development to protect environmentally sensitive areas
and to preserve significant, passive use, natural open space within residential
neighborhoods. In large-lot or multi-family developments, clustering may also be
accomplished by placing building pads close to each other, while employing other
mechanisms to protect remaining natural open space. (See also Policy 11.1.11.)
1.1.2 The Town shall continue to consider development impacts on natural rolling terrain and
emphasize low-densitydevelopments in these areas. This will include evaluating areas with
slopes of 15 percent and greater for development compatibility and safety, with the
possibility of preserving them as natural open space. The Town strivestoµavoid annexation
commitments that compromise theLL langoals or policies.
1.1.3 The Town shall-continue to avoid development encroachment into washes, riparian areas,
designated natural open space and environmentally sensitive lands. In cases where
encroachment is unavoidable, such as in the case of utility or public safety, require
compensation or trade to offset the loss of natural area.
1.1.4 _The Town shall commit to preserve, protect, and enhance the visual qualities of Oro Valley
and surrounding visually significant si nificant areas, such as ridgelines, and closely monitoring or
reacting quickly to development plans of neighboring communities, and county, state, and
federal agencies. Thus, view protection shall be an essential aspect of Oro Valley's
community development review and project approval process. Where possible, encourage
permanent protection of scenic vistas, especially from the Oracle Road Scenic Corridor, the
Tangerine Road Corridor, and other corridors as specified in Policy 11.3.1 . (See also Policy
5.4.3.)
1.1.5 The Town shall continue to require that all new development in areas with sensitive wildlife
use fencing compatible with wildlife movement.
1.1.6 The Town shall continue to require the delineation of building envelopes on lots exceeding
15,000 square feet to encourage the retention of natural buffers between housing units.
Building envelopes designate the specific areas that can be disturbed in any way during or
following construction. The area outside the building envelope must be maintained in a
natural state. (See also Policy 11.2.17.)
1 9 Land Use
Policy Document Oro ValleyGeneral Plan
�
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May20, 2005
1.1.7 In areas adjacent to public lands (e.g., Coronado National Forest, Tortolita Mountain Park,
Catalina State Park), The Town shall promote acquisition of land to furtherp rotect or
enhance valuable natural areas. As appropriate, cooperate and/orartner with county,ty, state
and federal agencies (e.g., Coronado National Forest) toursue acquisition.
p q
COMMUNITY IDENTITY
1.2 To maintain Oro Valley's distinct identity consistent with community values.
1.2.1 The Town shall maintain Oro Valley's predominantly low-density character while considering
needs of financial stability and infrastructure efficiency.
1.2.2 The Town shall coordinate with Pima County and other jurisdictions to ensure that
development proposals in the Planning Area are compatible with the character of Oro
Valley.
1.2.3 The Town shall ensure that new development projects at the key entryoints to Oro Valley y
contain n distinctive gateway characteristics.
DEVELOPMENT DIVERSITY
1.3 To promote a compatible mix of land uses throughout the Oro Valley Planning Area.
1.3.1 The Town shall encourage the location of residential neighborhoods close to activity centers
compatible with residential uses, and vice versa.
1.3.2 The Town shall encourage new development to locate uses that depend on convenient
transportation access (e.g., higher density residential and commercial) near major arterial
streets.
1.3.3 The Town shall encourage the establishment of new commercial uses in areas sc designated
on the land use map near new residential neighborhoods -• •- ; ;
expanding curt—- • • , with the type, scale, andotential for bufferingto be taken
P
into account.
1.3.4 The Town shall encourage clustering of commercial developments at specific nodes or
villages that are planned with strict aesthetic and design guidelines. The Town shall
discourage strip commercial developments and free-standing pads.
1.3.5 The Town shall encourage master planning that looks comprehensivelythe at subject
properties and all adjacent areas.
1.3.6 The Town shall_encourage new developments to incorporate accommodations for non-
motorized travel in their design.
GENERAL LAND USE
1.4 To proactively guide future development in the Planning Area.
1.4.1 The Town shall continue to require detailed site analysis for plan submittals. The information
from the site analysis will be used in deciding the approval or denial of land usep pro osals.
When appropriate, site tours or inspections will be performed by the Planningand Zoning
Commission, Development Review Board and Town Council.
1.4.2 The Town_shall continue to ensure that zoning near natural parks,
open space, washes, trails,
trailheads, schools, recreation areas, Tortolita Mountain Park, Catalina State Park, and Pusch
Ridge Wilderness provides adequate buffers and compatible uses.
Land Use 20 --.,.
Oro Valley General Plan Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 10, 2005
y
1.4.3 The Town reasonably wishes to be=satisfiedthat,suff c ent demand exists before authorizin;
a hi her land use intensity than present zoning permits.
-:4:-3-1.4.4 The Town shall continue to incrementally update its zoning to ensure that it is in
conformance with the General Plan. This will be accomplished through rezonings that
replace zoningthat is incompatible with the uses designated on the General Plan.
1.4.41.4.5 The Town shallp rohibit heavy industrial and outdoor commercial uses that require
I Iy
significant infrastructure, introduce greater truck traffic, or are visually and environments
g
incompatible with the Town's vision.
1.4.51.4.6 The Town shall work with La Cholla Airpark, Inc., and the County to adopt off-airport
land use compatibility atibilit controls to protect the airport from encroachment by incompatible
uses and to ensure the safety of nearby residents.
1.4.61.4.7 The Town shall ensure that increased densities approved for high density residential
projects is-are based on reducing the negative impacts on adjacent lower density residential
projects and providing additional landscaping, open space, and other amenities.
1.4.71.4.8 The Town shall continue to require adequate buffering of commercial and
Y
emp to ment uses from adjacent neighborhoods, with special consideration being given to
placing office or other less intense uses adjacent to the residential areas.
-4&1.4.9 The Town shall continue to require that Commerce/Office Park uses locate lower
intensity uses along arterial streets with adequate setbacks to reduce the visibility of larger,
more intense uses.
1-4.91 ,4.10 The Town shallp rovide other jurisdictions an opportunity to comment on all General
Plan amendments within, or within one-quarter mile of, the planning areas of those
jurisdictions.
1.4.1.417;.4..11 The Town shall establish procedures to ensure the coordinated development of
in
vacant areas of 40 acres or more either under multiple or single ownership by requiring the
development of master plans for those areas. These master plans must consider and seek to
minimize the impact of development on all adjoining properties.
•
LAND USE AND AIR QUALITY
1.5 Top romote land use planning practices that benefit the air quality of Oro Valley and the
region (See also Policy 11.3.4.)
1.5.1 The Town shall continue to encourage high density development to concentrate along
existing or planned transit corridors within growth areas.
111 1.5.2 The Town shall continue to ensure connectivity of major arterial routes, bicycle routes and
pedestrian routes.
1.5.3 r a r rr* r - s r r• r ••• - •rr-r• •- • - . .. • A . . .- =• r w
pedestrian access, employment, and housing.
1.5.41.5.3 The Town shall 6ensure predictable, significant enforcement levels for regulating
construction and maintenance activities that may produce significant amounts of dust,
particularly during high winds.
1.5.51.5.4 The Town shall ensure that areas appropriately zoned and planned for neighborhood
commercial use are developed.
21 Land Use
Policy Document Oro ValleyGeneral Plan
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May20 2005)
1-741.5.5 The Town shall establish and maintain minimum density and intensity standards for
development within planned activity centers, particularly forplanned transit corridors per
the Transit Development Plan.
1.5.71 .5.6 The Town shall promote access management practices for significant ificant roadwa s in an
g y
attempt to reduce the likelihood of future conflicts and multiple access points.
1.5.81 ,5,- The Town shall prepare standards for evaluating developments of regional impact
g p
(regional traffic generators), including an analysis of other committed or planned
development within a project's impact area.
LAND USE MAP
The Land Use Map for the General Plan depicts the proposedg eneral uses of land within Oro
Valley. It functions as official Town policy on the allocation and distribution of different land uses.
This pattern of land uses is shown on the Land Use Map by means of various land use designations,
each of which denotes specific types of land use. The boundary lines between land use designations
are shown as precisely as possible, and generally follow property lines, washes, and/or roads. The
Town's Zoning Map implements the General Plan land use designations by ordinance at a much
more detailed, parcel-specific level.
LAND USE STANDARDS
Following is a brief explanation of the Town's approach to stating land use intensity standards for the
designations appearing on the Land Use Map, followed by descriptions of the usesp ermitted under
and standards associated with each designation.
In addition to characterizing land use designations according to types of allowable uses, the General
Plan must, according to state law, specify for each land use designation standards ofpop ulation
density and building intensity.
Standards of building intensity for residential uses are stated in this General Plan in terms of the
allowable range of dwelling units per acre. The density ranges are applied as follows:
1. The maximum number of dwelling units allowed on a particular piece of residentially-
designated
Y
designated property is based on the size of the area under discussion (e.g., a parcel) and
the maximum density permitted under the residential designation applied to that
property. For instance, an area of 40 acres with a designation of LDR2 could have up to
80 dwelling units.
2. Densities within portions of the area may be higher than the maximum in the land use
designation as long as the maximum number of units is not exceeded and the land use
matches the land use description. For example, if the description is for single-family,
Y
detached land uses, the land use cannot be townhomes or any other attached housing.
g
Standards of population density for residential uses can be derived by multiplying the maximum
number of dwellings per acre by the average number of persons per dwelling unit, which for
purposes of this General Plan is assumed to be 2.41 persons (based on the average household size
reported in the 2000 Census).
Land Use 22 --.
OroValley General Plan Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005
Standards of building intensity for non-residential uses
are stated
in terms of maximum allowable floor-area Various Building Configurations
of the gross
Representing an FAR of 1.00
ratio
ratios (FARs). A floor-area ratio is the
building square footage permitted on a lot to the net
square footage of the lot. For example, on a lot with
10,000 net square feet of land area, an FAR of 1.00 will1114411110
allow 10,000 square feet of gross square feet of building /
floor area to be built, regardless of the number of stories -�
in the building (e.g., 5,000 square feet per floor on two
floors or 10,000 square feet on one floor). On the same
lot, an FAR of 0.50 would allow 5,000 square feet of
floor area and FAR of 0.25 would allow 2,500 square
feet. The diagram to the right illustrates how buildings
of one and two stories could be developed on a given
lot with an FAR of 1.00.
LAND USE DESIGNATIONS
The Land Use Map of this General Plan uses 14 land use designations to depict the types of land uses
that will be allowed in Oro Valley. The land use designations on the map are policy
recommendations only. The designations may not represent the actual zoning on properties. No
decisions b
reg arding land use purchases or future construction should be based solely on these
designations. For information regarding the most current zoning entitlements on a property, refer to
the official Zoning Map and the Zoning Code available at the Town Clerk's Office
Followingare brief descriptions of the intent of each of the land use designations appearing on the
p
Land Use Map. Note that emergency services uses (e.g., police and fire) may be permitted under
all designations with appropriate review.
Rural Low-Density Residential(R-LDR, 0-0.3 DU/AC)
This land use designation denotes areas of large lot single-family detached development in a rural environment. Rural low-density residential designation areas range up to 0.3 dwelling units per acre.
Areas of rural residential development are appropriate where there is a desire to retain a rural
lifestyle or where protection of the natural environment is necessary.
Low-Density Residential(LDR1, 0.4-1.2 DU/AC)
The district denotes areas where single-family detached residential development is desirable, but only
if it is at a density that will permit retention of a rural, open character. Low-density residential
g
designation areas range up to 1.2 dwelling units per acre. Delineation of building envelopes on
individual lots is also encouraged to clearly indicate which areas will be disturbed and which will not.
Low-Density Residential(LDR2, 1.3-2.0 DU/AC)
The district denotes areas where single-family detached residential development is desirable, but only
if it is at a density that will permit retention of an open character. Low-density residential designation
areas p
u rangeto 2.0 dwelling units per acre. Delineation of building envelopes on individual lots is
also encouraged to clearly indicate which areas will be disturbed and which will not.
fir- -.
23 Land Use
Policy Document Oro Valley General Plan
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005)
Medium-Density Residential(MDR, 2.1-5.0 DU/AC)
This designation is where single-family detached, townhouse, oratio home development opment is suitable,
ranging from 2.1 to 5.0 dwelling units per acre. These areas should be located close
to schools,
shopping, and employment.
High-Density Residential(HDR, 5.1+ DU/AC)
This land use designation denotes areas where single-family attached, mobile or manufactured
ctured
housing (within the existing Highlands subdivision), townhouse, atio home, condominium,i num, and
apartment development is appropriate. These areas should be located close to arterial access and
shopping and employment opportunities. High traffic volume impacts on local, lower
pdensity
residential streets are discouraged.
Master Planned Community(MPC)
This land use designation refers to areas where large multi-use developments should be planned and
developed in a comprehensive manner. Density ranges will be determined at the time of rezoning by
examining the development plan and development impact analysis. Any Land Use Map amendment
proposal for a new MPC designation requires the submittal of a p
conceptplan. Also see Special Area
Policies starting on page 26.
Resort and Golf Course (RGC)
This designation denotes areas where resorts, country clubs andolf courses areappropriate. Resorts
g
include hotel accommodations, restaurants, health clubs, and recreation facilities. Country clubs do
not include hotel accommodations. Golf courses may include specific golf-related activities such as
clubhouses, p
driving ranges, and storage yards.
Neighborhood Commercial and Office (NCO)
This designation denotes commercial and office areas located withgood arterial access (i.e., at the
intersections of arterial roadways or along Oracle Road) that are close to residential areas. Within
these areas, uses such as grocery stores, drugstores, and offices tend to serve the surrounding
neighborhoods and are integrated with those neighborhoods. Offices includerofessional offices,
,
tourism-related businesses, and services. The recommended maximum FAR in the NCO designation
is that of the C-1 zoning district.
Community/Regional Commercial(CRC)
This designation is for commercial areas at the intersections ofrinci al arterials. Uses mayinclude
p p
variety stores, small department stores, and large-scale commercial uses (such as p
major department
stores) that can be sited to serve regions of the metropolitan area. The recommended maximum FAR
in the CRC designation is that of the C-2 zoning district.
Commerce/Office Park(COP)
This designation denotes areas where commercial, office, and/or light manufacturing g can occur.
These uses can occur in a planned business park-type of environment with clustered buildings and
inward focused activity. Commerce parks often include a mix of light industrial, professional office,
office/showroom, office/warehouse, retail services, and related uses. The
specific zoningdistrict will
be determined based upon site use, adjacent land use impact, and intensity of development. The
recommended maximum FAR in the COP designation is that of the Technological Park zoning
g
district.
Land Use 24
Oro Valley General Plan Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005
Public/Semi-Public (PSP)
This designation denotes acreage dedicated for public or semi-public uses, which include churches,
police/fire substations, Town facilities, and hospitals. The recommended maximum FAR in the PSP
designation is that of the Technological Park zoning district.
Schools (SCH)
Schools are public or private places of general instruction including public and charter schools where
grades K-12 are taught, and junior and four-year colleges and universities. The recommended
maximum FAR in the PSP designation is that of the Technological Park zoning district.
Parks (PARK)
This designation denotes areas that have been developed or set-aside as public/semi-public
recreational facilities.
Open Space (OS)
These are natural open space areas that have been preserved through zoning, conservation
easements, or public ownership.
Significant Resource Area (SRA)
This designation denotes areas that contain key historic or archeological sites or other
environmentally sensitive lands. It is an overlay that includes areas that have been preserved and
those that should be preserved through the methods listed in the Open Space and Natural Resources
Conservation Element. If these areas arc not preserved, aAny development that takes place in them
these areas should be Wend with the natural l-a-ndscape, promote preservation of scenic vistas,
. - -- - - . -•. �- 0 -; -• _ • - _ ;" •" - at the
• • •
lowest density allowable in the underlying designation and by clustering wit-•- -- - 4. _ • ••-
portions of the SRA area. showuld include wm t gation measures consistent_with the Endangered 5:p_ecies
Act (ESA), the National Historic Preservation_Act (NHPA) and other laws, as appropriate to &specific
resource area. Mitigation of develo ment__im acts should__also blend with the natural landscape
U plomote.... reser_vition of scenic vistas__protect wldlfe habitat and_cluster development within the
least sensitive portions of the_,SRA.
In order to preserve property within an SRA overlay zone, densities may be transferred from within
the SRA overlay zone to other areas of a property. The transferable density (TD) within the SRA
overlay shall 11 for_residenti_al areas be the lowest density allowable in the underlying land use
designation(s),,_,and 2.,Jor,non7residential_areas ,be_;atrman__FA:R of_:_.,10. However, no TD credit shallm_be
iven for areas, such as_slo__es over 15o floodwa _s si nificant ve_..etat.ion or riparian,habitat that
are already restricted relative to densities by the zoning Code This density transfer may increase the
allowable density in those portions of the property to which density is transferred above the stated
density range for the land use designation(s) in that area. However, density transfers must meet the
following criteria:
1. The density at the periphery of the property shall not exceed either that of the underlying
designation or the adjoining property, whichever is greater.
2. The resultant land use within any designation on the property must be consistent with the
description of the housing type provided in the land use section. Thus if an area is described
25 Land Use
Policy Document Oro ValleyGeneral Plan
Adopted May29, 2003(revised May20,2005
�
as single-family detached housing, the density transfer could not effectuate a single-family
g Y
attached development. Or if the area is designated for single-family housing of any kind, it
could not be developed for multi-family uses.
National Forest(NF)
This designation is applied only to the Coronado National Forest. The Pusch Ridge Wilderness
borders Oro Valley, providing the scenic backdrop for the Town, an area where only non-motorized
and non-mechanized recreational use is permitted.
• • • • w • w • •• • w • w • • •
• •" - -;^; ; 11" or • • ^; "" • 4'; ; "t,' "^ ; •"." "• •"" •;" 3
• • • • • • mire w • • • •i w• "- i-, i•
•
•• : r- •• r= • • w• ••r •:• ••• !• =• • r r• •• r• - • • ••• • r ••r• ; a • • •• ••• •
• w w • • : • • • • w w
w•• i • • • r •• ••- •r
•
GROWTH AREAS
The Town has identified f ve-four "growth areas," as follows:
1. Oracle Road/Tangerine Road: Southeast Rancho Vistoso commercial center, the us
industrial campus
park in Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 3, and adjacent areas.
2. Oracle Road/First Avenue: The Target Center, Steam Pump Village, Honeywell, and adjacent
areas.
3. Oracle Road/Magee Road/Ina Road: The areas adjacent to these intersections and between
the intersections along Oracle Road.
4. Foothills Mall Area: Bounded generally by La Cholla, Ina, Shannon, and Magee Roads.
3.La -r • • --- --- - -: - -- •- a. - a. -; ad
•
As defined in the State statutes, these are areas "that are particularly suitable for planned multi-modal
transportation and infrastructure expansion and improvements designed to support a planned
concentration of a variety of uses, such as residential, office, commercial, tourism and industrial
uses."
URBAN SERVICES BOUNDARY
Figure 3: Land Use Map delineates an Urban Services Boundary (USB) around most of the Planning
Area. The Town does not intend to provide urban infrastructure to areas outside of the USB. These
areas should not receive any increase in density or land use intensity over what currently exists.
SPECIAL AREA POLICIES
Kai-Capri (including the approximately 10-acre Steam Pump Ranch Estates property in the
southeast corner of the area)
General
1 . Transfers of residential densities are permitted and encouraged in the area. Primary receiving
areas are: (1) the graded area in the north central portion of the site; and (2) areas adjacent
to Rooney Ranch no more than 660 feet north of the south boundary and no farther east
Land Use 26
Awn
Oro Valley General Plan Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005
than the east edge of Palisades splits. Units should be transferred off the following areas: (1)
SRAs, (2) areas along North First Avenue (especially the area between the road and the
Palisades
Splits parcels), and (3) the area southeast and visible from Palisades Splits parcels.
p
2. Transfers of densities from SRAs that are not riparian areas (including 50-foot buffers),
floodp lains, or 25 percent slopes may be calculated at up to 1.0 units per acre. Transfers of
densities off the other SRA, or building within any SRA, should be at no more than 0.4 units
per acre.
3. Primitive trails, with public access easements, shall be provided unless otherwise prohibited
bylaw. These will be within the existingwash areas, will connect to the open space area
adjacent to the north boundary of the site, and will provide a connection from the Palisades
Split Area southeasterly to the wash.
4. Any change to the General Plan that would allow more than 1.0 units per acre, over all, on
the residential area on the property shall be treated as a major amendment. As currently
mapped, the maximum number of residential units on the Kai-Capri Property is 255; and up
to 10 are allowed on the Steam Pump Ranch Estates property. Any change of the
commercial area to residential uses shall be treated as a major amendment.
5. The Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised will apply.
Neighborhood Commercial/Office (NCO)
1. Must be developed for commercial and office uses as part of an overall master plan that
includes planning for the MPC property to the south.
2. Any building within 200 feet of North First Avenue shall not be higher than 25 feet as
measured from the finished grade of North First Avenue, unless the applicant demonstrates
by a viewshed analysis that a greater building height will not interfere with views of the
Catalinas.
3. A minimum of 40% of the North First Avenue frontage to a depth of 300 feet must be
maintained as a view corridor and not used for building purposes.
4. The commercial areas shall not extend, on North First Avenue, to the south of the Evergreen
(Walgreen's) development.
Master Planned Community
MI
1. Must be developed for residential uses as part of an overall master plan that includes
planning for the NCO property to the north.
2. No building within 200 feet of North First Avenue, or within 150 feet of Palisades Road or
existing development shall be higher than 18 feet, unless the applicant demonstrates by a
viewshed analysis that a greater building height will not interfere with views of the Catalinas.
3. There shall be no development in the 100-year floodplain, riparian areas or on any slopes of
25% or more, excluding roadway and utilities.
4. The only housing type permitted is single-family detached residence.
5. Mass grading for residential uses is allowed only in disturbed areas. Any mass grading shall
require the approval of the Planning and Zoning Administrator.
2 7 Land Use
Policy Document Oro ValleyGeneral Plan
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May20, 2005)
6. No buildings shall be constructed within 100 feet of the eastp Y adjacent ro ert line adjacent to existing
residential areas.
.01
' ; ---• ' -- - - -
•
•
D-; ; ;• DO ;- •- ;; ; - -; ; ; - - -; ;;;
/ • V • • A •V • . •. •d. . ..
Rooney Ranch North
The area designated as Master Planned Community may be developed at upto three units per acre.
p
Kelly Ranch
Seek to acquire the Kelly Ranch property through a joint effort with the National Forest Service,
Arizona State Parks, and Pima County, monitor the Keller Nursery property, and maintain the
Significant Resource Area designation on the whole property.
La Cholla-Tangerine
For the safety of school children and to reduce impacts on surroundingneighborhoods, access onto
Gloverg
should be limited to the extent possible. Primarily, access should be onto La Cholla.
Only single family residential uses are allowed adjacent to Wilson K-8 School.
The master plan required for the La Cholla-Tangerine Area (per Policy 1.4.10) will address safe and
direct access to the Wilson School especially options for crossing La Cholla when it is fully developed.
ed.
Guidelines for Commercial Development:
1. Uses such as manufacturing involving toxic materials, regional commercial uses (e.g., big box
retailers), motels, and 24-hour convenience stores/gas stations are not considered to be
appropriate commercial.
2. More intense uses such as hotels and retail commercial shall be located closer to arterial
street access points and away from existing, less intense uses.
3. Buildings shall transition from a community commercial scale in the core to a scale
comparable to residential areas along the perimeter.
4. The only permitted high density residential uses are congregate care, assisted living care, and
skilled nursing facilities.
Land Use 28
Oro Valley General Plan Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005
LAND USE MAP
The Land Use Map designates nates land within the town according to the 14 designations described
Iabove and summarized in Table 2. These designations are depicted in Figure 3.
I Table 2: Planning Area Land Use Designations and Acreage Distribution
Designation Label Acres % of Total
I Rural Low DensityResidential RLDR 9,762 21.9°�°
Low DensityResidential (0.4 - 1.2) LDR 1 8,178 18310
°
Low Density Residential (1 .3 - 2.0) LDR 2 1,101 2.50
Medium Density Residential MDR '3,04111.3°°
IHigh Density Residential HDR 1,525 3.4%
Master Planned Community MPC 1,038 2.3%
Resort/Golf Course RGC 1.920 4.3%
INeighborhood Commercial/Office NCO 1,085 2. 10
Community/Regional Commercial CRC 692 1_5%
Commerce/Office Park COP 757 1.710
Public/Semi-Public PSP 520 1.2%
School SCH 700 1 .6%
Parks PARK 3 961 8.9%
lb Open Space OS 8350 18.7%
National Forest NF
Total 44,630 100%
k
Significant Resource Area (Overlay) SRA 13,570 30.4%
..
I
I
h
1
. _
I
29 Land Use
Policy Document Oro Valley General Plan
Adopted May 29,2003 (revised May 20, 2005)
Land Use 30 --�
1
• J
• r d+" ;::,':;:....,:;,}5-'44.4'
r n;F O_ c o
a 1 r p Jifl f
g E pi 5 g. gi 2
4:.;,:ii;,-,7----,:::-. ---,-.: ,
,.:_tzt,20-.._,:-..-i_tr--= _
Cli''''- - -
i EL,, t i
_1 (%.' 0 gt% ac(, ), .8 __ 1
, f F
13 €J 2 5 !i t'
v NEca> = c� � �� �
.)1111_ iiiil.:„s,,,.: ,-.,..-i
C o(n
`11J p
4,a ,__. ..,..:,,,,,,,,ti. a E ppE 09_O
a
11
‘,. .„
To
e
\ L5"--_,
a. \\\\ \ '4,, 8
5,3
E o,\\, \\\,\ \\\\\.. .
\ \
oa
E \ W 1L
'\ \\%\ \
f8_ 8 A � 5
et�'�:. �l O V/
C E
Z 0- U U O d
'‘'\ * '
C
piill I3- i4.. . ci, < 3..„. a., n Q
a Q Q o
J
\\\\4\
all
o 0 0 0 UQ
P. N O -5-
O `_ N N 0
p M s. t
1Cfiliig
g
,. A ,i1 i Is o
�;..- c `f U
__ \ ‘
o c
Z p qcqt� p
Ss‘N,".', 2 ; O a O !
,‘, s\- i 2 To 3 -.' e•5.) to 35 2 .
r � ❑
L.
W �
Fes 0 N
>- c,i z-1-,---- -
,� csi
- \\\.\\.\\,.,,, J
W 0
Q RS
> ICI (hi(O
I
C
0 %
o a
Iz
0
a)
Oro Valley General Plan Policy Document
_.
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005
2. COMMUNITY DESIGN
STATEMENT
The Town should, to theg reatest extent possible, integrate the manmade elements into the natural
environment withgreat sensitivityand with minimal disruption to existing topographic forms and
ecosystems. In order to foster the realization of these goals of sensitive development and minimal
y
disruptionexisting to the natural environment, it is critical that future development be sensitively located with large areas of the natural desert left in an undisturbed state for the enjoyment of all
residents and the continued viability of existing biotic communities.
GROWING SMARTER/PLUS REQUIREMENTS
• The State's Growing Smarter/Plus statutes do not include any requirements for addressing community
general designwithin plans, for communities of any size. The Town's decision to address these is
entirely optional.
KEY POLICY ISSUES
DESIGN GUIDELINES
The Town's Zoning Ordinance includes Design Guidelines which cannot be static. They need to
continue to evolve and respond to the future development of the Town to provide consistency,
continuity, relationship to natural colors and textures, and reduction of visual clutter. These
guidelines apply to site planning, landscaping, and architecture.
SITE PLANNING
A major goal of Oro Valley is to preserve the existing natural Sonoran Desert to the greatest extent
possible for existing and future generations. Large-scale development in view corridors, grading of
large areas, the introduction of non-native plant species, and the destruction of habitat are prime
issues related to community design.
SIGNAGE
Increased commercial activity has added signage throughout the Town. Signage controls have to
balance citizens concerns about the increasing level of signage with the needs of businesses to attract
customers.
LIGHTING
Increased development threatens our dark skies for the region's astronomers and Town residents.
However, the desire for dark skies needs to consider safety in areas where security is a major,
demonstrated concern, such as schools and large shopping center parking lots.
3 3 Community Design
Policy Document Oro Valley General Plan
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005)
COALS AND POLICIES
BUILT ENVIRONMENT
2.1 To ensure that the built environment is aesthetically pleasing and compatible with the
natural surroundings.
2.1.1 The Town shall continue to promote architectural themes andp )roject site design that blends
the built environment with natural surroundings. Project design should adhere to the
following guidelines:
• Building height and bulk should be moderate to low intensity, in harmony with
individual site attributes.
• Use earth tone colors and colors predominant in the surrounding natural landscape;
• Masonry/tile materials are strongly preferred.
• Parking lots with greater than 20-car capacity shall be screened from adjacent uses
and public thoroughfares, clustered or distributed to reduce heat concentration,
increase landscape areas, and provide green belts.
• Require residential development calling for building height in excess of 18 feet to
show a variety of rooflines.
• Those delineated in Policy 11.3.3.
2.1.2 The Town_shall require new development projects to explore solutions that employ natural
p Y
materials and prohibit designs that channelize watercourses except where extreme threats to
public safety would exist if the watercourse were not channelized.
2.1.3 Per the Drainage Design Manual, the Town shall continue to require the use of soft materials
containing integral desert colors for erosion protection, as opposed to concrete lining.
2.1.4 The Town shall require that all development proposals depict an arrangement of and massing
of buildings and/or arrangement of lots to minimize impacts on views from adjacent
properties and streets and from properties and streets internal to the proposed project while
providing privacy for residents.
2.1.5 The Town shall continue to require that all development proposals employ design strategies
that g
minimize changes to existing topography and the disturbance of existing vegetation.
2.1.6 The Town shall require that buildings be designed with recognition that all sides of the
buildings, including the roofs, may affect their surroundings.
2.1.7 In order to maximize integration of the built environment with the natural environment and
to minimize distractions of the built environment, The Town shall require all new
development proposals to incorporate means of reducing the apparent size and bulk of
buildings.
2.1.8 The Town shall continue to require that all landscape improvements adhere to the following
general guidelines:
• Maintain a predominantly natural desert image and conserving water resources;
• Preserve, restore, and enhance the ecological and scenic qualities of the natural
landscape;
• Mitigate negative visual impacts of buildings and parking lots; 4111
• Add aesthetic charm, interest and character; and
• Improve the functional use of a site.
Community Design 34
Oro Valley General Plan Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005
shall require that all new development 2.1.9 The Town proposals consider existing landscaping q
feet of the project site to provide and maintain landscape continuity within the
within 400
community.
2.1.10 T h e Town shall create standards for signage to provide information and direction to allow
businesses to attract and maintain customers with the least intrusive signage possible.
2.1.11 The Town shallp rovide architectural design criteria to help the Town develop an
architectural "character" without being so rigid as to hamper creative architectural
expression.
SOLAR DESIGN
2.2 To ensure access to, and control of, incident solar energy.
40,4
2.2.1
The ThTown shall promote site planning and architectural design that reduces heating and
-
cooling demands, provides rovides more comfortable indoor and outdoor living spaces, and avoids
blocking or reflecting sun on adjacent public spaces or buildings.
LIGHTING
2.3 To ensure the maintenance of dark skies and at the same time provide for the safety of its
residents.
2.3.1 The Town shall ensure that new development provides adequate lighting levels to meet the
security standards of the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, and place
fixtures and require lamp types that minimize light pollution.
1
35 Community Design
Policy Document Oro Valley General Plan
Adopted May 29,2003 (revised May 20, 2005)
Community Design 36
Oro Valley General Plan Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2()05
3. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
C STATEMENT
Oro Valley's economic future is interwoven with its distinctive community character based on a
residential/resort image and its proximity to the Pusch Ridge Wilderness, Coronado National Forest,
and Catalina State Park. Diversification in the local revenue base is desirable. However, any new
development must be consistent with the community's vision for the future and values.
GROWING SMARTER/PLUS REQUIREMENTS
The State's Growing Smarter/Plus statutes do not include any requirements for addressing economic
development within general plans, for communities of any size.
KEY POLICY ISSUES
+� DIVERSIFICATION OF THE ECONOMY
The current reliance the community has on growth and development to fuel its economy leaves Oro
Valley vulnerable to economic fluctuations. As the Town approaches build-out, development will
slow down and the revenue it currently generates will have to be replaced. Diversification of this
revenue stream with high-quality, low-impact development may allow the Town to provide services
without increasing or adding new taxes or fees as new revenue sources. Resort-based tourism and
# eco-tourism, which depend on the natural and cultural resources of the region, are a natural fit with
the Town's environmental ethic.
RETAIL DEVELOPMENT/LEAKAGE
A high percentage of Oro Valley residents spend a significant amount of money outside of the Town
� reducing the financial benefits to the Town. Creation of preferred high-end shopping opportunities
through development and annexation could reduce retail leakage.
JOB CREATION
There are some retail and service sector jobs available, but the majority of its residents are
professionally employed. Therefore, the local businesses must import employees to work in Oro
Valley while residents must leave the Town to work. The vast majority of Oro Valley working
residents leave the Town to work. There is a need in Oro Valley for high-tech, campus-type office
development with opportunities for professional employment so that residents can work in the Town.
6 REVENUE GENERATION
Sales tax revenues are not the only source of income for the Town. Other revenue streams, such as,
but not limited to, development fees, user fees, property taxes, and annexations are other methods
to pay for services.
10'
37 Economic Development
Policy Document Oro ValleyGeneral Plan
Adopted May29,2003 (revised May20, 2005
�
GOALS AND POLICIES
ECONOMIC SUSTAINABILITY
3.1 To ensure long-term financial and economic sustainability for the Town of Oro Valley.
y
3.1.1 The Town shall ensure that future growth reflects the desires of the community in balance
with an analysis of the Towns financial needs, maintain and periodically update the Town's
Community Economic Development Strategy to ensure that future development will
complement community values and implement the community's economic vision for the
future, while maintaining the ability of Oro Valley to attract and retain desirable businesses.
3.1.2 The Town shall continue to strive for a diverse economic base that will help reduce Oro
Valleys dependence on revenues derived from growth-related sources. Encourage and
support the following types of uses as means of diversifying the local tax base, increasing
local employment opportunities, and decreasing expenditure leakage to nearby
communities.
• Hospital and health services.
• Technology-related employers (e.g., biotech, optics).
• High-end commercial establishments.
• Businesses that provide services to and support the retirement community, such as
medical supplies or geriatric specialists.
• Tourism and eco-tourism related to the area's natural amenities and cultural history,
including Catalina State Park, Coronado National Forest, and the Biosphere.
• Higher education facilities.
3.1.3 The Town shall pursue annexation of the state land north and east of Sun Cid and work with
the State Land Department to create and adopt a conceptual develoment_plan for the area.
3.1.33.1 .4 The Town shall make strategic public investments, such as capital improvements, that
support appropriate, desirable economic development.
3.1.43 1 The Town shall continue its efforts to attract new high-end retail and service
businesses, especially those in under-represented categories, in order to help reduce
expenditure leakage.
3747-33.1 .6 The Town shall require the preparation of economic impact analyses for all major
development proposals (defined as commercial, employment, or multi-family developments
over 20 acres or any development with over 200 residential acres) and proposed
annexations to the Town.
3.1.63.1.7: The Town shall support the development of high quality employment-related uses
that are compatible and consistent with the scale, character, and workforce of the
community. Campus-type employment centers that emphasize a unified architectural
theme, pedestrian orientation, and a natural landscaping theme are encouraged.
3.1.73 1 8 The_Town shall consider alternative revenue sources, such as a property tax and
additional impact/user fees as alternative revenue sources.
3.1.83.1.9 The Town shall recruit commercial businesses and other employment-related uses
that do not negatively impact the neighboring residential areas.
Economic Development 38
Oro Valley General Plan Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005
Th
1 1 f e Townsupport shall annexations that are economically beneficial to the Town. Any pre-
annexation �a ill str�ve_to avoid and, to the extent os-stbie_ sti-w�e toward
reement wan
-• •- - creating negative impacts„to the_saf ..er_r views or incerit _ofey.�_��..
xistin nei hborhoocis_res ecting_existin _entitlements There will be a provision for
adequate notice for all pre-annexation agreements..
p
p
I
39 Economic Development
Policy Document
Oro Valley General Plan
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20,2005)
Economic Development 40
Oro Valley General Plan Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005
4. COST OF DEVELOPMENT
STATEMENT
This Cost of Development Element articulates the Town's interest in ensuring that new development in
Oro Valley does its fair share to perpetuate the high standards that the Town has established since its
incorporation. The goals and policies of this element will ensure that these standards are maintained
and that new development addresses the needs and interests of new as well as existing residents and
the Town government.
GROWING SMARTER/PLUS REQUIREMENTS
According to the State's Growing Smarter/Plus statutes, the Cost of Development Element must do
the following:
• Identifies policies and strategies to require development to pay its fair share toward the cost
of additional public service needs generated by new development, with appropriate
ONexceptions when in the public interest. This element shall include:
• A component that identifies various mechanisms that are allowed by law and that can be
used to fund and finance additional public services necessary to serve the development,
including bonding, special taxing districts, development fees, in lieu fees, facility construction,
dedications and service privatization.
• A component that identifies policies to ensure that any mechanisms that are adopted by the
municipality under this element result in a beneficial use to the development, bear a
reasonable relationship to the burden imposed on the municipality to provide additional
Is necessary public services to the development and otherwise are imposed according to law.
Essentially, the Cost of Development is intended to ensure that new development pays for the public
infrastructure and services that are required to serve that development. As with other Growing
Smarter/Plus elements, this requirement is targeted primarily at high growth areas, with the objective
of avoiding public subsidies of private development.
KEY POLICY ISSUES
COMPLIANCE WITH GROWING SMARTER/PLUS
The Cost of Development Element is new to the Town of Oro Valley. While the Town has enacted
measures to ensure that new development is paying for its fair share of the costs associated with new
development, it has not formally adopted broad policy, either in the General Plan or elsewhere. The
Cost of Development Element is the Town's opportunity to do so.
1.1
GOALS AND POLICIES
FAIR SHARE ALLOCATION OF COSTS
4.1 To ensure that new development pays its fair share of the additional costs of extending or
improving public service facilities and systems and that these costs do not financially
burden existing residents.
4.1.1 The long-term fiscal impacts, both cost and revenue generation, to the Town and its
taxpayers relating to proposed new developments shall be evaluated as a criterion in the
development review process.
41 Cost of Development
Policy Document Oro Valley General Plan
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005)
4.1.2 The Town shall continue to assess the long-term costs and benefits of annexation versus
short-term gains.
4.1.3 The Town shall continue to encourage annexation of county islands andP eninsulas to
facilitate infrastructure expansion and improve operational efficiencies of municipal services,
and standardize design criteria. • .
d e rn a rid e x ids be -re att -rtz+ a land J i ens. t h. .
4.1.4 The Town shall require new development to pay its fair share towards the cost of additional
public facility and service needs generated by new development, with appropriate
exceptions when in the public interest, and shall continue to review and set development
fees to meet the fair share requirement. The fair share review will recognize the fiscal
benefits of the development as well as the costs.
4.1.5 The Town shall require new development to construct or provide funds towards the
construction of regional facilities necessary to serve the development, meeting the twin tests
of rational nexus and rough proportionality.
4.1.6 In areas where infrastructure is not programmed, The Town shall require the installation of
on-site and off-site facilities to serve the ultimate buildout of the area.
4.1.7 The Town shall contribute towards the development of infrastructure facilities in areas where
infrastructure is not adjacent, but reasonably available, programmed, and funded.
4.1.8 In unincorporated areas within the Planning Area, The Town shall work with Pima Countyto
ensure that new development contributes to the construction of public facilities at the
Town's service level standards.
4.1.9 The_Town shall permit the reduction of required facilities, payments, or fees in designated
infill incentive areas or other areas in accordance with the Arizona State Law and in the
public interest.
FUNDING MECHANISMS
4.2 To employ the most efficient and equitable funding mechanisms to provide public
facilities and services to new development and to upgrade existing facilities and services.
4.2.1 The Town shall continue to employ development fees as a mechanism to ensure that new
development contributes its fair share toward the cost of new facilities and services needed
to serve the new development. The Town shall ensure that its development fees meet the
rational nexus and proportionality tests.
4.2.2 The Town shall continue to use bonding as a funding source for the construction of public
facilities to serve new and existing development.
4.2.3 The Town shall consider the use of special districts for the replacement/upgrading ofp ublic
facilities in areas of existing development.
4.2.4 The Town shall consider the use of privatization, public-private partnerships, and
jurisdictional revenue/facilities sharing, where such funding mechanisms can be shown to
result in lower capital and operating expenditures at the same or better level of service.
4.2.5 The Town shall explore the use of repayment agreements and financial participation in the
construction of facilities by developers that are larger than needed by a new development or
that extend beyond a new development.
Cost of Development 42
Oro Valley General Plan Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005
4.2.6 The Town shall periodicallyundertake comprehensive studies to evaluate the efficiency,
lit of existingand potential funding mechanisms for the provision of public
equity, and legality
development.to new and existingdlment. Based on the findings of this evaluation, the
funding
Town shall update existingmechanisms to reflect the cost of providing public
o p
services to new development.
111111
SERVICE AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
4.3 To ensure that the Town has sufficient information to effectively plan for, develop, and
implement fundingmechanisms to support the development of infrastructure and services
to serve new and existing development.
4.3.1 The Town shall undertake an evaluation of current levels of service (LOS) for public services
provided to Town residents and businesses. Based on this evaluation, identify indicators to
periodically measure the qualityof services provided. These periodic measurements will
p y
provide the basis for establishingbudgetary priorities for Town facilities and services and
financing adjustingmechanisms, as appropriate. Update the LOS evaluation study at regular
intervals (e.g., every three to five years).
4.3.2Ih _Icwnprepareregularly and update a fiscal impact model to determine the cost of
shall
new development and annexations on public infrastructure, facilities, and services. Utilize
the fiscal impact model to determine and regularly update the level of funding mechanisms
used to assess new development.
4.3.3 The Town shall annually prepare concise, easy-to-understand summaries in text, tabular
and/orp
gra hic form of the annual Budget Plan, Capital Improvement Program, cost of
public services studies, level of service studies, funding mechanism studies, and related
studies. Annually make these summaries available to Town staff, elected and appointed
officials, residents, businesses, and other interested parties.
WNW
OD
1111
43 Cost of Development
114
Policy Document Oro Valley General Plan
Adopted May 29, 2003(revised May 20, 2005)
I
Cost of Development 44
Oro Valley General Plan Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005
5. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION
STATEMENT
Oro Y
p Valley's transportation system, as well as the transportation system for the Planning Area as a
lprovide residents and visitors with safe, convenient and efficient mobility. With scarce
whole, must
p system financial resources, the transportation s stem must also be cost-effective in order to successfully
compete for limited local, state and federal funds.
The current and future demand for movement of goods and services must be accommodated in a
manner that meets the needs of business while preserving Oro Valley's neighborhoods and the
Sonoran Desert environment. Reduction in traffic volumes and vehicle miles traveled is a desirable
goal both to reduce traffic congestion and maintain air quality standards. Development of a
promotes transportation network that alternative modes of transportation (e.g., transit, bicycling) and
tripreduction programs (e.g., telecommuting, compressed work weeks and ridesharing), and the
p g b
• adoption of a land-use policythat links trip origins to nearby destinations are proven methodologies
p
which can achieve this goal.
GROWING SMARTER/PLUS REQUIREMENTS
The State's Growing Smarter/Plus statutes include the following direction concerning the content of
the Circulation Element for communities with fewer than 50,000 residents.
• General location and extent of existing and proposed freeways, arterial and collector streets,
bicycle routes and anyother modes of transportation as may be appropriate, all correlated
• with the Land Use Element of the General Plan.
fir,. The Growing Smarter/Plus statutes also describe requirements for a bicycling element, but only as a
mandate for communities with more than 50,000 residents. These requirements, which are optional
for smaller communities such as Oro Valley, are as follows:
• Consists ofp
pro osed bicycle facilities such as bicycle routes, bicycle parking areas and
designated bicycle street crossing areas.
Together, these requirements are intended to provide guidance concerning the development of all
aspects of the Town's transportation system. The most prominent aspect of the Circulation Element,
p p
however, relates to the roadway network and the Town's plans and standards for improvement ofthe
network. These plans and standards outline the Town's strategy for providing mobility for its residents
.�.
and efficiently moving traffic through and within the Town.
•
KEY POLICY ISSUES
Through the course of the community outreach program conducted for the General Plan Update, a
"b wide variety of transportation issues were brought to the attention of the Town. Following are
summaries of these issues.
SAFETY AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
Some of the Y
major roadways in the Planning Area do not meet the current Town standards. As a
result, some may be unsafe and/or subject to drainage problems. Problem areas need to be
identified and prioritized so that improvements can be constructed.
45 Transportation/Circulation
1
Policy Document Oro ValleyGeneral Plan
Adopted May29, 2003 (revised May20, 2005
�
REGIONAL ROADWAY FUNDINGI
Funding for regional street and road improvements, which isg
p lanned through the Pima Association
of Governments (PAG), is limited and expected to be under funded, resulting in uncertainties as to
111
the priority and cost-efficiency of required street and roadway system improvements.
stem im rovements.
DEPENDENCY ON AUTOMOBILE is
The near exclusive dependency upon automobiles for transportation in Oro Valley conflicts with
some expressed community interests (e.g., preservation of the environment, airqtY
uali , and
neighborhood quality) and creates congestion. Alternative modes of transportation need to be
identified so that some of the expressed community interests can be achieved. One option might be
p g
the use of neighborhood electric vehicles for local trips provided an appropriate travel network can
be created within the limitations of State law.
ROADWAY DESIGN CAPACITY/EFFICIENCY
Good planning involves roadways to be built to anticipate future growth, not reacting after the
congestion has occurred. When growth exceeds roadway network capacity, congestion and
increased travel times result. However, overbuilding roadway capacity is expensive and could
discourage use of alternative modes. It could also require that more s.space be dedicated to roadways.
y
CUT-THROUGH TRAFFIC/NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION
In order to preserve Oro Valley's neighborhoods, the street network must be e designed to discourage
g
traffic from using local streets as cut-through routes to avoid congestion on arterial streets. However,
neighborhood preservation measures should not result in unnecessary increases in travel distance.
Additionally, buffer areas must be provided through the platting process in order to shield
neighborhoods from the noise from principal and minor arterials.
NORTH-SOUTH ARTERIALS
North-south traffic, particularly, between Oro Valley and Tucson, will continue to increase as new
development occurs in Oro Valley. Oracle Road does not have enough capacity to handle the
p Y
anticipated future traffic interaction, and I-10 is too far west to provide a convenient alternative, so
identification of alternative north-south routes and public transit will be necessary to avoid severe
congestion problems.
Oracle Road: Traffic projections for Oracle Road, a State-maintained road, show traffic
volumes are so high that the road will require upgrading to efficiently accommodate the
increasing demand. This would affect access to the commercial and employment
development existing and projected along Oracle Road. It could also be inconsistent with
neighborhood and environmental goals. These improvements present a financial and
implementation challenge to the region.
First Avenue: First Avenue is projected to be the second most heavily traveled roadway
within Oro Valley (behind Oracle Road). While the roadway capacity has been enhanced,
additional signalization may be necessary to accommodate increased volumes, articular)
p Y
westbound turns. Future improvements will be addressed through a Department of Public
Works project to provide for the necessary improvements to upgrade this road.
—11"111%***".."(0/111.41"'"'
li
Transportation/Circulation 46
Oro Valley General Plan Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 200.5
La Cholla Boulevard: This
road is planned for eventual connection with 1-10. As a result, it is
an important future roadway.
La Canada Drive: This is a congested two-lane roadway from the Canada del Oro Wash to
the southern edge of the he PlanningArea. (North of Tangerine an extension to Moore Road is
planned.) This congestion
is exacerbated byschool crossing zones that are active during peak
travel periods. Pima
Countyfunds allocated to widen this roadway have been reallocated, so
improvement of this road will occur at a later date, or if the Town annexes the area and
reconstructs the road.
EAST-WEST ARTERIALS
While recent traffic studies conducted on the behalf of the Town have shown that the predominant
travel movement
is in a north-south direction, east-west corridors also have need for capacity
improvements.
Tangerine Road: Tangerine Road connects Oracle Road to 1-10. Four miles of the roadway
(from Shannon Road to First Avenue) are maintained by Oro Valley. Most of the drainage
along this roadg
is carried through dipsections. At several locations, safe stopping sight
distance is not adequate for the posted speed of 45 miles per hour. The Town has scheduled
safety andcapacity acit improvements to Tangerine Road to occur through 2005.
Ina Road: Valley
Outside of the Oro town limits, yet within the study area, this roadway is
experiencing cogCounty congestion. Pima and Marana are responsible for maintenance of this
road and have plans for future expansion.
eventually
Lambert
Lane: This road mayconnect 1-10 with Oracle Road via Pusch View
Lane. As a result, it is an important future roadway.
Moore Road: Future east-west extensions of this road from East Rancho Vistoso Boulevard to
La Cholla Boulevard willp rovide additional access to major north-south arterials.
GOALS AND POLICIES
TRAFFIC SAFETY, CONVENIENCE,AND EFFICIENCY
5.1 To ensure the
safe, convenient and efficient vehicular and non-motorized traffic
circulation to serve both within and through the community.
5.1.1 The Town shall continue to ensure that Oro Valley's roadway network is developed with the
proper amount of capacityto serve traffic generated by the land uses depicted on the
General Plan Land Use Map. Strive to maintain at least a level of service "D" on all streets
within Oro Valley.
5.1.2 The Town shall schedule roadway improvements to avoid LOS "E" without creating excess
roadway capacity in advance of demonstrated need.
_
5.1.3 The_Tn_shali__ continue to identifyand correct existing and potential traffic hazards.
ow .
_ neighborhoods and homeowners' associations to develop
5.1.4 The Town shall coordinate nate with g
neighborhood traffic and control measures.
47 Transportation/Circulation
Policy Document Oro Valley General Plan
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005)
5.1.5 The Town shall continue to ensure that arterial and collector roadways are designed esigned and
constructed to accommodate safe and convenient pedestrian and bicycle use. This should
d
include sidewalks, sufficient outside lane width, androvide other specific provisions.
p p ns.
5.1.6 The Town shall continue to ensure that bike, vehicle, andpedestrian conflicts are '
throughminimized
appropriate design standards.
5.1.7 The Town shall present pedestrian and bike safety courses.
5.1.8 The Town shall evaluate the creation of a connected network of exclusive pathways andon-
street . p y
routes for neighborhood electric vehicles and similar alternatives wherep ermitted.
5.1.9 The Town shall employ traffic calming techniques in local street design.
5.1.10The Town shall continue to implement a maintenanceg
pro ram that ensures roads with
reduced hazards through such measures as street cleaning, routine repair and replacement,
g p p ,
striping, and signage.
TRANSPORTATION FINANCE
5.2 To prioritize transportation roadway improvements to
provide the greatest benefit to the
Town given limited financial resources.
5.2.1 The Town shall continue to coordinate the implementation of the Circulation Element Map
with the Town's annual CIP process to prioritize transportation p
capital improvements.
p
5.2.2 The Town shall continue to monitor opportunities and
p ursue fundingavailable from other
regional, state, and federal sources.
TRANSPORTATION EFFICIENCY
5.3 To design a transportation network that promotes the reduction of traffic volumes and
vehicle miles traveled.
5.3.1 The Town shall require that pedestrian and bicycleathwa s are constructed, where feasible,
p y
to separate bike and pedestrian traffic from motorized vehicles in order top rovide safe
access to schools, parks, other activity centers, and the Town's trails network. (See also
Policy 8.2.1.)
5.3.2 The Town shall continue to require that all new or reconstructed collectors and arterials
include sidewalks per the Town's standard roadway cross-sections.
5.3.3 The Town shall work with major employers and organizations toptrip romote reduction
programs.
TRANSPORTATION AND THE ENVIRONMENT
5.4 To provide for the efficient movement of goods/services whileg Valley's
reservin Oro Valle 's
neighborhoods and the Sonoran Desert environment.
5.4.1 The Town shall maintain a harmonious relationship between urban development and
development of the transportation network.
5.4.2 The Town shall ensure that major transportation system wash crossings (collector streets and
g
above) are designed to be hydraulically efficient and environmentally sensitive with
minimum disruptions or impacts to riparian areas and wildlife habitat. (See also Policy
Y
--41446'40111.146**1"'
[it
Transportation/Circulation 48
Oro Valley General Plan Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005
5.4.3 The Town shall continue to maintain view protection as an essential aspect of Oro Valley's
process.transportationg design Where possible, permanent protection of scenic vistas is to be
py
encouraged, especially from the Oracle Road scenic corridor and Tangerine Road corridor.
Road construction on slopes should minimize the visual impact of the roadway. (See also
Policy 1.1.4 and policies under Goal 11.3.)
5.4.4 The_Town shall continue to ensure that sufficient buffer zones and/or buffering techniques
are employed for all land developed adjacent to arterials and collectors.
5.4.5 Street standards for four-lane or larger roadways shall continue to include landscaped
medians. Planting within the medians shall consist of low water use vegetation.
TRANSIT SERVICES RESTRUCTURING
5.5 To incrementally restructure the Town's existing transit services, including Coyote Run, to
match both the economic and residential growth of the Town.
5.5.1 The Town shall continue to promote affordable transportation alternatives for transit-
dependent Town residents.
5.5.2 In designing transit routes, The Town shall emphasize coordination of trips to common
destinations.
5.5.3 The Town shall coordinate the Town's existing Coyote Run service with existing regional
services provided by Sun Tran and Van Tran.
5.5.4 The Town shall utilize the Transit Development Plan to guide changes to transit services.
MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION
5.6 To develop a transportation system that facilitates alternative modes of travel such as
transit, bicycles, walking, and neighborhood electric vehicles.
5.6.1 The Town__shall encourage development design and orientation that promotes and facilitates
multi-modal transportation access, particularly in and around Oro Valley's major activity
p
centers (e.g., Oracle and 1st Avenue, the Naranja Town Site, the Municipal Services
Complex) and acquire appropriate sites as may be necessary.
5.6.2 The Town shall continue to promote Oracle Road as the Town's priority north-south transit
corridor.
5.6.3 The Town shall promote transit-oriented development standards and zoning provisions to
ensure that land use decision-making and development plans are coordinated.
5.6.4 The Town shall encourage private industry to develop and maintain alternative fuel stations at
commercial centers, hospitals, and/or other areas that attract the general population.
EXPANSION OF TRANSIT SERVICES
5.7 To undertake additional planning activities to establish a future, more vigorous transit
system when additional funding becomes available, as outlined in the Transit
Development Plan.
5.7.1 The Town shall support the provision of economical transportation alternatives to all Town
residents regardless of age or disability.
49 Transportation/Circulation
MI
A
Policy Document Oro Valley General Plan
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20,2005)
5.7.2 The Town shall design and implement an Oro Valley Neighborhood Circulator Service for in-
town travel.
5.7.3 The Town_shall support the development of transit service that provides viable options for
Oro Valleyp
residents to travel to destinations outside of the Town limits, particularly
for
commuters destined for major employment centers in Tucson.
TRANSIT CONNECTIVITY
5.8 To develop a public transportation system that allows all Town residents to conveniently
travel between and within regional and local activity centers, as outlined in the Transit
Development Plan.
5.8.1 The Town shall participate in efforts to study the feasibility of a regional public transit
authority for the Northwest Region or the entire metropolitan area.
5.8.2 The Town shall participate in employer- and community-based programs to encourage
g
people to use public transportation more.
BICYCLING
5.9 To ensure the development of the bikeway system and encourage its use. (See also Goal
8.5.)
5.9.1 The Town shall condition the approval of new development on dedication and construction
of bikeways as indicated in the Annual Report on the Implementation of the Pedestrian &
Bicycle Plan.
5.9.2 The Town shall continue to construct bikeways as a part of road improvement projects.
5.9.3 The Town shall eliminate gaps and barriers in the pedestrian and bikeway systems when
constructing roadway, pedestrian and bikeway improvements.
5.9.4 The Town shall create various formats to promote Oro Valley as a Bicycle and Pedestrian
Friendly Community.
• Prepare a Bikeways Map and Guide for the Town incorporating the Arizona bicycle
laws. The guide map will depict parks, commercial and recreational centers,
emergency centers and transit locations.
• Create a Town web page that will contain information regarding bicycle facilities and
a method whereby residents can report maintenance problems.
• Establish a "Safe Route to School" program. (See also Policy 6.2.6.)
5.9.5 The Town shall continue to develop methodologies to encourage trip reduction and multi-
modal transportation.
• Work with major employers to expand their participation in TRP.
• Work with Oro Valley Transit to monitor needs for additional bus stops and Bike and
Ride locations.
• Expand the shared-use path network to encourage pedestrian and bicycle use within
the Town of Oro Valley.
5.9.6 The Town shall work with local grade schools to implement an effective safe riding program
for school children.
Transportation/Circulation 50
Oro ValleyGeneral Plan Policy Document
May
Adopted 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005
P
5.9.7 The Town shall work to educate bicyclists ists and motorists on sharing the road and increase the
enforcement of existing traffic laws.
5.9.8
The Town shall collaborate with Pima County and Tucson to enact consistent standards and
designguidelines for pedestrian and bicycle facilities that will provide for a safe and sensible
g
network.
4
5.9.9 The Town shall consider shorter intervals for maintenance and striping of bicycle facilities.
5.9.10The Town shall create a mechanism via the Internet for reporting maintenance problems.
CIRCULATION MAP AND STANDARDS
""
Figure 4, Circulation Element Map,
depicts four roadway classifications: Major Arterial, Minor
Arterial, Collector (Major and Minor), and Local. Each of these classifications is associated with a
variety physical of functional and characteristics. Table 3 outlines the basic character of eachclassification. Detailed cross-sections for each classification are depicted in the Town's Street
Standards Manual.
Table 3: Circulation Map Classifications and Standards
Street Service On-Street Rights-of-
Classification Function Bike Facilities Access Medians Parking Sidewalks Way
Major Arterial Higher speeds, Multi-Use Lane and/or Access suburban Yes None. None 150-300 ft.
regional access Shared Use Path. centers.
Curbed bike route
Minor Arterial Moderate- Multi-Use Lane and/or Intra-community Yes None. Both sides, 75-150 ft.
speeds and trip Shared Use Path. continuity. on curbed
length. Curbed bike route streets.
Collector Distribute trips Multi-Use Lane. May penetrate No None. Both sides 50—150 ft.
from arterials to Curbed bike route residential on curbed
destination. neighborhoods. streets.
Local Low speeds, Direct access, No One or Both sides 50-60 ft,
Er through traffic lowest traffic both sides. on curbed
discouraged. mobility. streets.
I
111
I
Y' r5
� .r air
z,
51 Transportation/Circulation
Policy Document Oro Valle General Plan
an
Adopted May 29,2003 (revised May 20, 2005)
e,
Transportation/Circulation 52
C
__.; ,,,,, „..„,_ ,
_...„,„ 47.7,.._ .r. _, _4,4,..„,„,, 0
A
r'-_,-.A..,-1,',...T- 7, ,,.,,,,, i
N N
{ E ° CO c°) v
V Q. a)Q Eic� .c
.— CO CCV acvN C) MO
',� o Ec ul CU oEa, . 0
, , 1' '� 3 ami c c� rn
i c N 05
0 CD E> > a, m LL
41am E . a >,
.. , .,-0 4- B. . o ,
— a) ,.. •N 2
L. - tY a c• 0
OW 2w Ego
Q. of (n'50
0u) o r o
C 1--
,..... RS
■.•a■..■•■•■M
.•.•••••'6 i
i
i
i.
i
i
i
i
i
I.
i
i
i
i
i Co
f 2
i Q
i cm
c 0
c a)
a, O
i ^ — tJ O Oii t5- .75
V) •-
: al a) , � a) a) O a,C N OOO
! _ d Q ` ` O
i Q Q U U cti
1 J
c ? •o °c .o c° .Y
' N
i ;
0 Li.. ti 2 2 2 2 3 L
i i i
11- 11
i. . i
i i ►i ■�i ■
I ■
ii
i
! i
I i
i i
L.c ii
i
1
0 ii1
ii z 0
i I > N
o-
I J 1
N
ice+ Q
� � W
I O Q
ce z) --,.0 Z ,--*it z /\
(13 ,..,-4 _L
III O CX
Z
o
CD
O thZ
� o
� O
r----
Oro Valley
General Plan Policy Document
Adopted May 29,2003 (revised May 20, 2005)
6. PUBLIC FACILITIES, SERVICES, AND SAFETY
STATEMENT
the Public Facilities, Services and Safety purpose of Element is to provide the Town of Oro Valley
with developmentg
oversight strategies that ensure orderly, rational development of infrastructure to
support projected growthsafety and to address the needs of its resident. The incorporation of the
Town of Oro
Valleywas the result of residents' desire to protect their public welfare and safety with
service management scaled to the community's character and resources. In short, the residents of Oro
Y
recognized a need topreserve a lifestyle and established a mechanism to accomplish it. This
Valley Y
element is intended to discourage hazards, both environmental and man-made, and to promote
•
healthful, secure enjoyment of the Town and its natural surroundings.
GROWING SMARTER/PLUS REQUIREMENTS
The Growing Smarter Plus statutes include separate content requirements for Public Facilities and
/
Services elements and for Safety elements. They are, respectively, as follows:
■ Generalg
ans p lforpolice, fire, emergency services, sewage, refuse disposal, drainage, local
utilities, rights-of-way, easements and facilities for them.
■ Protection of the community from natural and man-made hazards including features
necessary for such protection as evacuation routes; peak load water supply requirements;minimum road widths according to function; clearances around structures; and geologic
hazard mapping in areas of known geologic hazards. (Please note that water issues are
addressed in the Water Resources Element beginning on page 85.)
kb While both of these requirements are mandated only for communities of 50,000 or more, the Town
has chosen to address them as optional elements.
KEY POLICY ISSUES
Through the course of the communityoutreach program conducted for the General Plan Update, a
wide variety of public services issues were brought to the attention of the Town. Following are
summaries of these issues.
TOWN SERVICES
As the Towngrows, several program areas would also expand to meet the demand created by
growth. the
rowthIn past, the provision of Town services has lagged behind the demand associated with
new development. For instance, demand for park facilities has exceeded existing capacity.
SCHOOLS
As the community grows, schools will need to be developed within the Planning Area. The Town of
Oro Valleydoes not have direct control over school facility development. Amphitheater School
District has the responsibility forpublic school facilities, however, the School Board's Authority and
p y•
the District's abilityto build schools in a timely manner to avoid over crowding are limited by the
Arizona School Facilities Board and associated statutory law. Establishment of a stronger partnership
between the Town and Amphitheater School District is needed to help the district identify and
ensure dedication of school sites.
55 Public Facilities, Services, and Safety
Policy Document Oro ValleyGeneral Plan
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May20 2005)
CRIME-FREE COMMUNITY
One of the key characteristics valued by the residents is the low crime rate. Maintenance of
community safety requires a high level of police service and partnerships (communitypolicing).
p g
FIRE PROTECTION AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
Fire protection and emergency response services in the Planning Area arepby rovided the Golder
Ranch Fire District, Northwest Fire District, and Rural Metro Fire Department. Some interest has
been p .
expressed for the Town to assume responsibility for these services. There is stronginterest in the
Town ensuring that a high standard of response is available at equitable rates uniformly throughout
Oro Valley.
FACILITY PLANNING
The community's long-range planning must address the need for providing more facilities strategically
Y
located throughout the Planning Area to adequately respond in a timelymanner to emergency calls.
g Y
The Town Hall site is geographically located for consideration as a centralublic safety
p response
center. More dispersed satellite response units should continue to be considered top rovide a
presence close to residential and employment concentrations.
FACILITY MAINTENANCE
Maintenance of Town facilities will become an increasing financial burden to the Town as the Town
accepts more facilities, as existing facilities age, and as more facilities are built.
LIBRARY FUNDING
The Town is providing library services to Town residents and has portion completed a of the new
library, but funds for completing the facility and ongoing operations and maintenance are limited.
Also refer to policies in Arts and Culture, particularly Policy 9.1.8.
GOALS AND POLICES
GENERAL PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES
6.1 To ensure that adequate public facilities and services are provided when needed.
6.1.1 The Town shall ensure that municipal services and facilities are or can berovided efficiently
Y
and cost effectively prior to new development occurring or annexation of existing
development.
6.1.2 The_Town shall continue to require that all new developments be evaluated to determine
impacts on all public facilities within the town, including but not limited to schools and
roads. Such impacts shall be used as criterion in deciding the approval or denial of land use
rezoning proposals.
6.1.3 The Town shall ensure the provision of efficient public safety services to prevent and respond
to emergencies. To this end, continue to coordinate emergency service locations
throughout the community in order to obtain the desired response time as defined in
Emergency Service Reports.
6.1.4 The Town shall prohibit the placement of structures intended for human occupancy anc within
100-year floodways.
Public Facilities, Services, and Safety 5 6
Oro Valley General Plan Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005
6.1.5 The Town shall coordinate with the fire protection and emergency service providers to
ensure that they can meet the needs of new development.
6.1.6 The_Town shall continue to examine opportunities to contract out Town services and
public privatize services, where such contracting or privatization is determined to be
efficient and effective.
6.1.7 The Town shall consider corporate underwriting for some of the Town's park facilities.
SCHOOLS
6.2 To promote joint land use planning and the shared use of school facilities.
6.2.1 The Town shall continue to work with local school districts to ensure coordinated planning of
school facilities and exchange of information concerning development and planning-related
•
issues. This should include defining both school service areas and associated school needs
that can potentially be met through proactive implementation at the time of development
review.
■ Require that new developments reserve one elementary school site of at least 10
buildable acres for every 500 elementary school level students forecasted to live
within the development.
S ■ Require that new developments reserve one middle school site of at least 35
buildable acres for every 800 middle school level students forecasted to live within
the development.
■ Encourage the petitioners of smaller developments to discuss with the School District
the developmental impact and possible voluntary donations (land or financial) to
offset school construction costs within Town limits to the extent allowed by Arizona
State law.
• The school district will have the opportunity to determine whether a site, if one is
proposed by the developer, is suitable and acceptable for development as a school
site.
• Encourage park/school combination site dedications.
6.2.2 The Town shall continue to work with local school districts to share use of municipal and
educational facilities where feasible. (See also Policy 9.1.7.)
6.2.3 The Town shall require an evaluation of the adequacy of school facilities as a finding for all
residential land use requests before the Planning and Zoning Commission at the time of
rezoning.
6.2.4 The Town shall ensure that school planning issues, such as student safety and access, are
evaluated at the time of rezoning and development review.
6.2.5 The Town shall work directly with school districts during the development of school sites to
ensure that portions of school sites are available for joint use as parks or park-like settings.
(See also Policies 8.6.1 and 9.1.7.)
6.2.6 The Town shall work directly with the school district to create safe bike/pedestrian access to
school sites. (See also Policies 5.9.4 and 8.5.2.)
6.2.7 The Town shall explore the expansion of both Pima Community College and University of
Arizona branches in Oro Valley for adult education.
w
57 Public Facilities, Services, and Safety
Policy Document Oro Valley General Plan
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005)
LIBRARY
6.3 To provide adequate library services to Oro Valley and Pima County residents.
6.3.1 The Town shall prepare a Library Strategic Plan through the Arizona State Library Archives
and Public Records with Tucson-Pima Public Library and the Friends of the Oro Valley
Public Library.
6.3.2 The Town shall define and create a library vision. The vision defines what type of library,
information services, and programs the Oro Valley Public Library will provide, such as
general information, lifelong learning, conservation of Town cultural resources, and other
special collections and services. (See also Policy 10.3.1.)
6.3.3 The Town shall prepare a Library Fiscal Forecast for supporting and extending library services.
SAFETY
6.4 To ensure that residents, visitors, and property are adequately protected.
6.4.1 The Town shall continue to evaluate safety issues in reviewing school site plans.
6.4.2 The Town shall provide police substations, or other decentralized facilities, to provide high
g
visibility, quick response, and one-on-one interface with residents. The Town shall locate
these facilities to respond to growth, whether by development or annexation, using public
property where available.
6.4.3 The Town shall continue to expand the community policing program.
6.4.4 The Town shall continue to work closely with various service providers (fire districts, schools,
etc.) to expand public safety awareness and emergency training programs.
6.4.5 The Town_shalI continue to consider Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design
(CPTED) principles in its development review process.
6.4.6 The_Town shall develop standards for response readiness in regards to fire safety and
homeland security.
6.4.7 New development on the east side of Oracle Road shall include consideration of evacuation
routes and development standards and density that minimize potential impacts from wildfire
in the neighboring Pusch Ridge Wilderness and Catalina State Park.
I
—11.41/11.4"j0,1*******-
0
Public Facilities, Services, and Safety 58
Oro Valley General Plan Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005)
7. HOUSING
STATEMENT
Oro Valley recognizedis as a highly desirable place to live. The Housing Element presents strategies to
ensure that housingopportunities are provided within high quality neighborhoods that are safe and
pp
well-planned. Oro Valleyis defined by its strong neighborhoods and quality housing development
which meet the needs of current and future residents. Efforts should continue to be made to provide a
mix of housingat various densities and price ranges to allow people of all ages to enjoy the splendor of
Oro Valley.
GROWING SMARTER/PLUS REQUIREMENTS
The Growing Smarter/Plus statutes include requirements for Housing elements. They are as follows:
■ Standards andg
pro rams for the elimination of substandard dwelling conditions, for the
improvement of housing quality, variety and affordability and for provision of adequate sites
for housing.
• Contains an identification and analysis of existing and forecasted housing needs.
• Designed to make equal provision for the housing needs of all segments of the community
regardless of race, color, creed or economic level.
While these requirements are mandated only for communities of 50,000 or more, the Town has
chosen to address them as optional elements.
KEY POLICY ISSUES
NEIGHBORHOOD QUALITY
Oro Valleyis a relativelynew community with a majority of its housing stock less than ten years old.
However, over the next twenty years the housing stock and neighborhoods will begin to show age. If
Oro Valley is to continue to be recognized for its strong quality neighborhoods, the Town must
develop programs aimed at maintaining strong neighborhoods and preserving housing quality.
RANGE OF HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES
Residents who wish to remain in Oro Valley may be forced out by a lack of housing opportunities.
Over ap erson's lifetime, a broad range of housing types will be required, ranging from entry-level
rental and ownershipunits to assisted living facilities. In addition, the Town is expanding
empty-nesterprofessionals
opportunities for professional employment within the Town. Younger and professio a
pp
tend to look for rental housing, at least temporarily, and for smaller housing products on a permanent
basis.
59 Housing
Policy Document Oro Valley General Plan
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005)
GOALS AND POLICIES
HIGH QUALITY NEIGHBORHOODS
7.1 To promote the development of sound, high quality neighborhoods thatp rovide
community amenities in an integrated manner.
7.1.1 The Town shall continue to strive to protect the integrity and aesthetic context of existing
g
neighborhoods through the use of appropriate buffers or other means of land use transition
between incompatible uses.
7.1.2 The Town shall promote stability by establishing programs, when needed, for the
maintenance, protection, and enhancement of residential neighborhoods.
7.1.3 The Town shall continue to require apartment and condominium developments to
incorporate recreational facilities and other amenities to serve residents. In addition,
include a consideration of day care facilities in development review.
7.1.4 The Town shall continue to promote the development of distinct neighborhoods that create a
sense of place and recognize the natural features (e.g., steep slopes) of the land through
g
appropriate preservation of natural open space and the integral development of community
facilities (e.g., recreation, trails systems, etc.)
7.1.5 The Town shall continue to require the development of neighborhoods with safe vehicular
access, as well as non-vehicular access to schools, open space, recreation opportunities, and
other activity centers.
RANGE OF OPPORTUNITY
7.2 To encourage and maintain a range of housing opportunities.
7.2.1 The Town shall encourage the development of a variety of types of homes to accommodate
the varied needs of residents, including single-family attached and detached, townhomes,
small apartments (3-4 units), condominiums, active retirement communities and congregate
housing, with accessible options integrated among all types to accommodate the special
needs of elderly or disabled residents.
7.2.2 The Town shall encourage a variety of residential building types consistent with the General
Plan and in accordance with the Town's zoning and subdivision and design standards.
7.2.3 The Town shall allow and encourage -- - - : - - - ' • - , , -; --
•- •: • •:- = =-- --- - - - -masterwplanned_communitiesthat offei high-quality
neighborhoods -; -- - ; - --; .-- --. -' - with a variety of residential densities and ..
appropriately located commercial uses to serve the community, In these developments7-at- - • - -" • ensure
that there are ade_nateappri-ate`transitions and buffers between uses-tee
7.2.4 The Town shall recognize the housing needs of the Town's elderly and disabledpop ulations
by encouraging housing development oriented to these special needs groups.
JOBS-HOUSING BALANCE
7.3 To promote a jobs/housing balance within the Planning Area.
Housing 60
� Oro Valley General Plan Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20,2005)
7.3.1 To the extent feasible, given the high land costs, The Town shall encourage the development
of a variety of residential choices consistent with the Land Use Element to meet the housing
needs of employees of existing and future Oro Valley employers.
r
61 Housing
Policy Document Oro Valley General Plan
Adopted May 29,2003(revised May 20, 2005)
Housing 62
Oro Valley General Plan Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003'revised May 20, 2005)
111 8. PARKS AND RECREATION
STATEMENT
11 r s and Recreation Element is intended to protect and enhance the resort/residential image the
The Pak
Town wishes to maintain. Recognizing that it is the setting rather than structures that contributes most
to Oro Valley's character, spatial relationships derived from community design principles underscore
Y p p
the importance of natural and recreational open areas in framing the community's character. Likewise,
the appeal of both the area's outdoor activities and its scenic views are fundamental reasons for
residents'and tourists'enjoyment of the area.
GROWING SMARTER/PLUS REQUIREMENTS
The Growing Smarter/Plus statutes include requirements for Parks and Recreation elements. They are
as follows:
■ Outlines a Y
comprehensive system of areas and public sites for recreation, including the
following and, if practicable, their locations and proposed development: natural reservations;
parks; parkways arkwa ys and scenic drives; beaches; playgrounds and playfields; open space; bicycle
• routes; and other recreation areas.
While these requirements are mandated only for communities of 50,000 or more, the Town has
chosen to address them within this optional element.
This element addresses issues similar to those addressed in the Open Space and Natural Resources
Conservation Element. Generally, this element addresses active parks recreation opportunities, while
.nOpenSpace the S ace and Natural Resources Conservation Element focuses on passive recreation and
conservation.
KEY POLICY ISSUES
Through the course of the community outreach program conducted for the General Plan Update, a
wide varietyof issues related to parks, recreation and trails were brought to the attention of the
Town. Following are discussions of the most frequently raised issues.
PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES AND ACTIVITIES
Oro growing population Valley's is and the demographics are changing, with various age families
moving into the community. Existing parks and recreational amenities within the Town of Oro Valley
do not currently meet the needs of its residents. The following facilities have been mentioned as
concerns:
• Recreation centers,
• Neighborhood parks,
• Mini parks,
• Pet parks,
• Playing fields (soccer, baseball, and basketball),
• Picnic areas,
• Swimming pools,
• • Facilities for children,
• Mandatory parks in new housing developments,
63 Parks and Recreation
Policy Document Oro ValleyGeneral Plan
an
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised Ma 20 2005
■ Recreational and fitness trail facilities in open or park space, and
■ Possibly a public golf course.
Activities mentioned include the following:
■ General recreation programs,
• Educational training programs, physical development skills, health, outh activities, aquatic
Yq
activities (swim team, classes and exercise). The Naranja Town site was cited as appropriate
for recreational uses. Public art in the parks was mentioned. Also refer top olicies in Arts and
Culture, particularly Policy 9.1.8.
SCHOOLS AND COMMUNITY RECREATION
Cooperative school and community recreation programs are needed. Given scarce resources for
both the Town and the school district, a discussion needs to occur on sharing operational expenses
b p p es
associated with each entities use of the others properties.
SMALL, DISPERSED SYSTEM OF RECREATION AREAS
The Town's requirements for recreation areas (one acre for every 85 housing units) provides for many
small private recreation areas that may serve the needs of individual communities, but are not open
to the general public. There are problems with this approach, including the following: some are too
small, providing only open space, with limited recreation opportunities; most are dispersed and
p p
designed to be used primarily by neighborhood residents; Homeowner Associations (HOAs) may
choose not to pay for their upkeep; they may not tie into the riparian areas and other parts of the
p
Town's natural open space system; and developers/HOAs may resist tying these into the Town's trail
system.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACE FUNDING
There is no dedicated funding mechanism for the purchase of land forarks or open space, for the
p p p ,
improvement of recreation areas, or for the maintenance of any of these areas. The Town recognizes
the need to establish a long-term local funding source for future park development.
NARANJA TOWN SITE
When fully developed, the Town Site will play a central role in the Town's overallarks recreation,
�
and arts programming. To be successful, however, the Town Site will need to be Y
strate icall tied to
strategically
the community and other facilities through a network of convenient access ways. Also, the uses that
are ultimately located at the Town Site should complement other Town facilities and services, and
vice versa.
CATA L I N A STATE PARK
Catalina State Park provides essential trail linkages for Oro Valley. Hikers, bikers, and equestrians
alike enjoy many destinations within Catalina State Park. Additionally, the Park is used as an access
point into Coronado National Forest. These important linkages are emphasized in the Town's trail
plan, which also connects into the Eastern Pima County Trails Master Plan. The Town and the Park
share many common interests and there are many opportunities for projects between
the Town
cooperative p
and Park, including docent programs, art projects and classes, interpretiveg
pro rams. These
opportunities underscore the importance of continued cooperation between the Town and the Park.
(3\
Parks and Recreation 64
I
s
It
,- /. C o °o�
k .# co
0 .cm ff
x - 17, 3E ° cvc a)
ICDa,, acoN aa) i0 in
6. E2 c °o,, (no co
V Q . _ .2 a, (n N ti..
no) M 3a) ° tc Cern =
cp
_wiiiii_ I.L. 2 ..-6 u, 0 . >,
I pa 1! Pd11
cn -,E - .0 w .--)-- - -...(.., _'
- a€ ac >
COI w t°E °
oU
(n O 0 0
1 1
r . s s+a-w Q
a.
NO C O
N
—IO m
i
}— U
Ilt
i -c CD
'C ce
i to c E 2
as co Co m
iX —I Z kJ <L
a' O
lE i
i CDN co U O
a a a ( N .t] o
CI. aa up
C C C N. —U
rC C C
S1 i Co Co (o '` = ao U
a a a a a LL.
! =NM
elE
a
4
1 J <7v)
nsu. C
'c
Cco co
E ,
n- a
�- Cv
t0 O
D
c O
J (o CI
C a)
a U
O
> a) C
••
O C C
L O` a) (p
1 C to O O Y.
i ■
x
■
i
i.
J N (..,
i
—I a)
0 Cli
C 0 CCOL
p Qu 3
Z o
L
Q)
0 c o
Oro Valley General Plan Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005)
GOALS AND POLICIES
GENERAL
8.1 To develop an open space system within the Town of Oro Valley that has as integral
components, developed parks, natural open space areas, and connecting trails.
8.1.1 The Town shall promote a community-wide open space system that includes developed
parks, recreational facilities, natural open space areas, trails, and bikeways. These public
improvements should be developed in a manner that responds to the community's Sonoran
Desert setting. (See also Policy 11.1.5.)
8.1.2 The Town shall identify and work to acquire a La Cholla Corridor Park site.
8.1.3 The Town shall support establishment of an advocacy and funding group for parks, recreation
and trails.
LINKAGES
8.2 To provide linkages and connections between the component parts of the recreational and
natural open space system.
8.2.1 The Town shall provide appropriate pedestrian, equestrian, and bicycle linkages between the
various elements of the open space system and between these elements and other
community facilities. (See also Policy 5.3.1.)
8.2.2 The Town shall utilize the development review and approval process as a means of securing
and/or improving public access to natural resource areas and linear parks as well as
preventing development from limiting such public access.
8.2.3 The Town shall continue to utilize established development review processes to encourage,
and where possible require, the integration and connection of community open space
elements.
DEVELOPED PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES
8.3 To construct and maintain developed parks and community recreational facilities as
required to meet the needs and preferences of the residents of Oro Valley.
8.3.1 The Town shall continue to address existing deficiencies in the Town's community park
system.
8.3.2 The Town shall include appropriate facilities for all potential users in the design of new Town
parks.
8.3.3 The Town shall ensure that all residents in the community, including those with disabilities,
have equitable opportunities to utilize Town and private parks and other community
resources.
8.3.4 The Town shall integrate public art into the design of new Town parks.
8.3.5 The Town shall encourage public gatherings in Town parks for social, educational and other
community events and to design new parks to accommodate these gatherings.
8.3.6 The Town shall consider the demographic characteristics, safety issues, and concerns and
preferences of area residents as new Town parks are designed.
67 Parks and Recreation
Policy Document Oro Valley General Plan
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised Max 20, 2005)
8.3.7 The Town shall utilize the development review process, requirements for the provisions of
recreation, and requirements for master planning of areas to create, where practical, larger
recreational facilities of sufficient size and location, provided that access can be shared
equitably by multiple subdivisions. —
ACCESS TO NATURAL RESOURCE AREAS
8.4 To ensure that large natural resource areas in the vicinity of the Town are protected and
ail
made available for appropriate public use through cooperation with other jurisdictions
and resource management agencies.
8.4.1 The Town shall encourage and support the development of regional trails and other trails, per mid
the Trails Task Force report, that provide for public access to large natural resource areas in
the vicinity of the Town.
8.4.2 The Town shall encourage and support the development of trail and natural open space
connections to Catalina State Park and encourage and support the planned expansion of
Tortolita Mountain Park and the development of trails andpublic use facilities therein.
p
TRAILS AND PATHWAYS
8.5 To create a system of pedestrian trails/walkways, equestrian trails, and bicycle facilities
that not only function as recreational amenities but that can also be used in conjunction
with alternate modes of transportation. (See also Goal 5.9.)
8.5.1 The Town shall encourage and participate in the development of a multiple-use trail system
in accordance with the Trails Task Force report to ultimately, where possible, connect to
public preserves and the regional trail network per the applicable Town trails plan, and the
pedestrian and bicycle plan.
8.5.2 The Town shall encourage and participate in the development of bikeways and bike lanes in
accordance with applicable Town and regional bicycle facility development plans. (See also
Policy 6.2.6.)
8.5.3 The Town shall continue to include bike lane development in the scope of roadway
construction and improvement projects within the Town.
8.5.4 The Town shall support the use of bicycles as an alternate mode of transportation by
providing sufficient bicycle parking facilities at all Town parks, buildings, and other
community facilities.
8.5.5 The Town shall enhance public safety and convenience by posting regulatory and/or
informational signs along Town maintained segments of the community trail system.
8.5.6 The Town shall enhance public safety and convenience by requiring the posting of regulatory
and/or informational signs along segments of the community trail system constructed and
maintained by the private sector.
8.5.7 The Town shall require developers to designate and sign trails in natural areas within the
development at the time of initial construction.
JOINT-USE OPPORTUNITIES
8.6 To maximize the use of community resources by developing and operating joint-use
recreational facilities with local school districts, community colleges, and private
organizations.
Parks and Recreation 68
Oro Valley General Plan Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005)
8.6.1 The Town shall cooperate with other jurisdictions, resource management agencies, school
districts, and private organizations to develop joint-use and multiple-use facilities that
benefit and address the recreational and social needs of the community. (See also Policy
6.2.5.)
vx
69 Parks and Recreation
Policy Document Oro Valley General Plan
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20,2005)
9. ARTS AND CULTURE
STATEMENT
As it has grown and matured as a community, Oro Valley's interests in establishing and maintaining a
rich mix of opportunities for arts and cultural activities have becomes clearer. Accordingly, the Town
efforts to collaborate with its residents to achieve these opportunities have become more pronounced.
The goals and policies of this Arts and Culture Element further establish the Town's commitment to its
residents as it relates to arts and culture.
GROWING SMARTER/PLUS REQUIREMENTS
The State's Growing Smarter/Plus statutes do not include any requirements for addressing arts and
culture within general plans, for communities of any size.
KEY Poucv ISSUES
ARTS AS A BRIDGE
There is an opportunity to use the arts as a bridge to all segments of the community through festivals,
concerts, and local cultural events that bring people together. To this end, land and/or facilities for
community arts gathering places are needed.
PARTNERSHIPS
Partnerships with cultural and educational institutions, businesses, and other community
organizations are needed for the Town to successfully provide the arts to the community.
IMPROVED COMMUNICATION
There is a need for more communication between the Town staff/government of Oro Valley, arts
organizations such as the Greater Oro Valley Arts Council, and residents to ensure the arts are part of
the fabric of everyday life in the community.
ACCESSIBILITY TO ARTS INSTRUCTION
There is a need for professional arts instruction, either public or private, within the community.
There is also a need to expand cultural programs (e.g., language, arts, and crafts).
GOALS AND POLICIES
ARTS AND CULTURE
9.1 To enhance the quality of life by promoting and sustaining the arts and culture in our
community.
9.1.1 The Town's great physical beauty should set the tone for the promotion and perpetuation of
arts excellence within the built environment of the community, both public and private.
9.1.2 The Town shall continue to support the efforts of the GOVAC as the clearinghouse to
enhance the orderly development and growth of the arts in the community and to provide
residents with access to the arts through a continued Master Operating Agreement.
Arts and Culture 70
Oro Valley General Plan Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005)
citizen desires of the arts through an updated cultural assessment,
,.., 9.1.3 The Town shall determine
for the
more detail in the report entitled "A Community Cultural Assessment
described i n p
Town of
Oro Valley— November 1994" on file at the Town Clerk's office.
g
9.1.4 The Town shall base
efforts on existing, established plans such as an updated cultural
assessment and the strategic plan of the GOVAC.
9.1.5 The Town shall pursue
the enhancement of current venues and development of state-of-the-
art cultural parks,facilities including amphitheaters, performing arts facilities, instruction
space, galleries, and other appropriate facilities.
9.1.6 The Town shall encourage the development of designated art districts. Art districts are
State statute to pursue the development of arts and cultural facilities. They
authorized by
arep
p ublic improvement districts with tax exempt bonding authority.
9.1.7 The Town shall continue to support and cooperate with the Amphitheater School District,
private,
and charter schools to share school facilities for arts, recreation, and education
projects. (See also Policy 6.2.2 and Policy 6.2.5.))
shall encourage collaborative projects between arts organizations, Parks and
9.1.8 The Towng
to providelifelong
Recreation, and
the Library opportunities for residents to experience the
arts and culture.
9.1.9 The Townencourage shall encoura collaboration with regional/state cultural and educational
institutions top rovide residents with access to the arts and art instruction.
9.1.10
The Town shall create additional partnerships with businesses to support the arts.
II continue toprovide organizational resources to implement the Oro Valley
9.1.11 The Town shall g
endowment fund which includes an arts component per Town Council resolution.
continue to implement the one percent (1.0%) for public art on public and
9.1.12 The Town shall p
commercialpJ
ro'ects as written in the Town code, as well as seek transportation
grants from PAG for art projects. To ensure •ublic review and com•atibilit
enhancement
with surrou
ndin• develo•ments the Public Art Review Committee shall review all public art
projects.
a• 9.1.13 The Town g
shall encourage businesses to work together to create larger scale public art
_
projects.
EP
I
IP
p
71 Arts and Culture
4W
al
Policy Document Oro Valley General Plan
Adopted May 29,2003 (revised May 20, 2005)
10.ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORIC RESOURCES F-111
No
STATEMENT
Oro Valley is a town of breathtaking natural beauty and an area that possesses archaeological NI
resources that date from approximately 11,500 years ago to historic times. It is a community that takes
seriously its role as stewards for the area's rich historic resources. Oro Valley celebrates the richness 3
that these resources bring to residents and visitors. The purpose of the Archaeological and Historic
Resources Element is to acknowledge that the area's past and cultural resources are significant and
help shape the Town's future.
3
GROWING SMARTER/PLUS REQUIREMENTS
The State's Growing Smarter/Plus statutes do not include any requirements for addressing
archaeological or historic within general plans, for communities of any size.
KEY POLICY ISSUES
ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL RESOURCE PROTECTION
The Town of Oro Valley has a long and rich heritage. Prehistoric people commonly used areas now
included in the Town and the Hohokam lived in the area for nearly 1,000 years, mainly near the
major drainages. Archaeological sites range from large villages to small, temporary gathering or food
preparation sites. In historic times Apaches and Pimas traversed much of the area. Cattle ranching
became a major use at the beginning of the twentieth century.
The Town is still dependent on outside resources and expertise to determine the level of protection
of the archaeological and historical resources that are found throughout the Planning Area. In the
past the Town depended on the review and requirements of the State Historic Preservation Office
(SHPO) to determine the disposition of these sites in the face of development. In the late 1990s, the
Town passed an ordinance to require Town, as well as SHPO, acceptance of mitigation/preservation
plans. With this tool and outside expertise, the Town needs to place more emphasis on preservation
of the remaining sites.
INTERPRETIVE ELEMENTS
With increased preservation comes an opportunity for creating interpretive elements at the preserved
sites to educate the public and improve our appreciation of the area's history.
HOUSING ARCHAEOLOGICAL ACTIVITIES
There are no facilities within the Town to exhibit artifacts in order to educate the public about the 111
rich historic resources of the area. •r+
GOALS AND POLICIES -�
CULTURAL AND HISTORIC RESOURCE PROTECTION
10.1 To preserve the unique archaeological, cultural, and historic resources within Oro Valley
to the degree not already regulated by the State of Arizona.
44""*.***61.1"—
Archaeological and Cultural Resources 72
t
Oro Valley General Plan Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005)
10.1.1 The Town shall continue to require the preparation of cultural resources assessments,
in information about both prehistoric and historic uses, by a qualified archaeologist
including
or historian for all new private and public development projects.
10,1.2 The Town shall use the standards and criteria established by the National Register of Historic
Places, as significant amended, to identifysi nificant cultural resources, including people, events, and
activities, in Oro pY
, specifically ecificall identify Steam Pump Ranch and Honey Bee Village
10.1 .3 The Town shall continue to consider the potential effect of development projects on
prehistoric significant and historic resources during the planning and design processes.
Cultural resources determined to be significant will be preserved in place if possible, and if
not, appropriate recovery dataand documentation will be prepared in consultation with the
Arizona State Historic Preservation Office. Avoidance of significant sites is preferred over
data recovery and documentation.
10.1.4 The Town shall continue to ensure protection and appropriate handling of cultural resources
discovered during development site preparation and construction. If cultural resources are
discovered during development,ment, work shall cease until a qualified archaeologist inspects the
site and materials and makes recommendations regarding treatment. If human remains are
inadvertently discovered the Town shall contact related tribes or communities who may
have ancestral ties to the remains.
10.1.5 The Town shall actively seek grants and other funding mechanisms to provide for the
protection and preservation of cultural resources or resources of value to local culture. The
Town shall also investigate use of these funds to provide for interpretive locations and
facilities.
10.1.6 partnerships Through artnershi s and collaborative efforts, The_Town shall identify appropriate strategies
to protect archaeological and cultural resources.
• EDUCATING AND ENRICHING THE COMMUNITY
10ppp
.2 To maximize interpretive opportunities associated with cultural resources as a means of
providing important insight into the heritage of the community.
10.2.1 The Town shall require that public and private development project sites containing
significant cultural resources be assessed for potential inclusion of an interpretive element
into project design.
10.2.2 The Town shallpotentialincorporating considerthe for incor oratin interpretive elements related to
cultural resource sites during planning for public parks, trails, and other public use areas.
10.2.3 T_b _]ownshalt initiate and pursue cooperative opportunities with other juris ictions
_- actively �
and organizations (e.g., Catalina State Park, Pima County) with regard to use of sites f o r
education and historic interpretation.
10.2.4 During the planning lanning process for interpretive elements, The Town shall develop an
appropriate and consistent theme for these elements throughout the Town (e.g., common
graphic identity, uniform signage).
10.3 To provide a place to exhibit cultural resources.
10.3.1 As the Town acquires or develops facilities, it sh-ill look for opportunities to exhibit
q
artifacts to educate the public. (See also Policy 6.3.2.)
mow.
73 Archaeological and Cultural Resources
Policy Document Oro Valley General Plan
Adopted May 29,2003(revised May 20, 2005)
Archaeological and Cultural Resources 74
Oro Valley General Plan Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005)
11. OPEN SPACE AND NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION
STATEMENT
Oro Valley's exceptional environmental resources have shaped the Town's character. The conservation
of natural open space, biological resources, visual resources, and natural resources is of significant
public interest to the residents of Oro Valley and a high priority among Oro Valley's planning
objectives. In particular, the Town values lands with the following characteristics:
■ Provide, or affect, public resources such as aquifer recharge areas
■ Exemplify unique, ecologically sensitive, wildlife and vegetative habitat
• Define the identity of the community such as cultural/historic resources
C . Shape the scenic quality of life such as viewsheds
• Create unsuitable and/or hazardous conditions for development due to the slope, soil, or
geological, topographical, soil, or similar features.
The Open Space and Natural Resources Conservation Element is intended to identify and address the
Town's environmental resources in a comprehensive manner. The protection, restoration, and
maintenance of environmental resources require an integrated approach.
GROWING SMARTER/PLUS REQUIREMENTS
The Open Space and Natural Resources Element addresses the State's Growing Smarter/Plus
requirements for open space and elements. Following are brief descriptions of the statutory
requirements for these elements and an explanation of their implications for Oro Valley.
The Growing Smarter/Plus statutes require that municipalities with 10,000 or more residents include
an Open Space Element addressing the following items:
• A comprehensive inventory of open space areas, recreational resources and designations of
access points to open space areas and resources. (See Background Report.)
• An analysis of forecasted needs, policies for managing and protecting open space areas and
resources and implementation strategies to acquire additional open space areas and further
establish recreational resources. (See Background Report.)
• Policies and implementation strategies designed to promote a regional system of integrated
open space and recreational resources and a consideration of any existing regional open
space plans.
These statutory requirements focus on a variety of descriptive, analytical, and prescriptive issues that
are intended to ensure that the Town establishes a framework for protection and preservation of the
natural qualities that Oro Valley residents value so much. The first requirement calls for a descriptive
inventory of these natural qualities, focusing on large-scale open space areas, particularly those that
are set aside for recreational purposes.
The second requirement calls for a combination of analytical and prescriptive content that focuses on
understanding and responding to the open space needs of the community. As with much of the
Growing Smarter/Plus legislation, the intent of this requirement is to ensure that growing
communities plan for additional open space.
75 Open Space and Natural Resources Conservation
Policy Document
Adopted May29, 2003 (revised MayOro Valley General Plan
20, 2005)
The third requirement in the above list focuses on ensuringthat t local open space assets are
considered in light of their relationship to the regional system or network of
g y resources.
In addition, this element addresses Growing Smarter/Plus' requirements for
a conservation element,
which are optional for communities of fewer than 50,000 residents. These requirements are as
follows:
• Addresses the conservation, development and utilization of natural resources, including
c uding
forests, soils, rivers and other waters, harbors, fisheries, wildlife, minerals and other natural
resources.
• May also cover: The reclamation of land; flood control; revention and control of
p the
pollution of streams and other waters; regulation of the use of land in stream channels and
other areas required for the accomplishment of the conservationan°lprevention,, p on, control
and correction of the erosion of soils, beaches and shores; androtection of watersheds.
p e sheds.
KEY POLICY ISSUES
OPEN SPACE TOOLS
The Town needs to develop a wide range of planning tools that can be used to acquire,b protect, a n d
enhance those lands, such as environmentally sensitive lands, that help the te community's
character.
FUNDING FOR ACQUISITION OF OPEN SPACE LANDS
The Town has no specific funding mechanism for the acquisition and management q g t of natural open
space lands. Without timely establishment of such a mechanism, options for establishing g a connected
system of natural open space will be limited. To achieve the broad goal of preserving sensitive tive lands,
a method of financing to secure particularly valuable lands must be established and utilized to bolster
a comprehensive approach. Financing methods include targeted development fees, Town p funds,
sales taxes, or highly focused bond measures to meet specific ESL goals and objectives.ectives. The latter
two must be implemented by a vote of the Town's residents.
CONNECTIVITY BETWEEN NATURAL OPEN SPACE AREAS AND RECREATIONAL AREAS
There is presently not a fully developed interconnected natural open space system
p p within Oro Valley,
in part because there are some barriers to the development of such a system
p (e.g., roads, fencing
utilities, culverts, bridges, disturbed vegetation, overall infrastructure). Natural
open space needs to
be established with consideration given to establishing connections with other
open space and -ad
recreational areas within the Town and adjacent lands. Creation of new natural open space p p e resources
and connectivity with existing areas, both prior to and during the process rocess of development,
is critical.
LOSS, DEGRADATION,AND FRAGMENTATION OF BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ...•
Development in Oro Valley which does not consider the quantity and quality of natural
resources
can directly affect and result in the loss, degradation, and fragmentation of native e habitats, further airreducing the ecological value of these areas. This development has resulted in impacts on
p p biological
resources such as constraints on wildlife movement, impacts on wildlife from urban lighting,p g g, and
erosion into riparian corridors. The need for an increased level of management is accentuated
the Town's rapidpace g by
p of growth, which has been sustained since the ear( 1980s. Much of the
Town's land has been committedy
for development. The economic impact of environmentally04,sensitive land preservation is extremelysignificant.
g cant. The beauty of the Town's environmental
Open Space and Natural Resources Conservation 76
Oro Valley General Plan Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005)
resources and attractiveness of the resort atmosphere are primary factors for the continued influx of
residents, small businesses, and corporations.
RESTORATION OF DEGRADED HABITAT
Some areas within the Town once contained high value habitats that have subsequently become
degraded raded for a number of different reasons related to human activities within the Town. These areas
may provide excellent opportunities for environmental restoration.
PLANTS AND ANIMALS
Biotic communities protection require similar and enhancement. Inventories of plant and animal
communities can be compared with the more desirable development locations. Points of conflict will
yieldpp evep
opportunities for the development community and Town government to establish fauna and
florap rotection strategies and also encourage desirable development schemes.
INCREASES IN LIGHT AND GLARE
Development will add to the amount of light and glare within the community and result in loss of
.
nighttime skyvisibility. Oro Valley cooperates with the International Dark-Skies Association (IDA)
g Y
which seeks to stop the adverse environmental impact on dark skies by building awareness of the
problemlightpollution of and of the solutions, and to educate everyone about the value and
effectiveness of quality nighttime lighting.
VISUAL CHARACTER OF THE COMMUNITY
Maintaining andenhancing the existing visual character of the community has been identified as a
priority• interest. specific A area of concern is development on hilltops, ridges, and slopes, which are
highly visible from many areas in the community.
Also of concern is identification of important scenic vistas and views and protective techniques such
as use restrictions and easements.
BUILT ENVIRONMENT
As the Town develops, the built environment begins to dominate views. Standards are necessary to
ensure that development blends with the natural environment. Lighting and signage standards
directed at improving the existing visual environment provide additional means of maintaining and
enhancingtheTown's image. Standards and density restrictions are needed to keep development.
- from creating undesirable views, often referred to as a "sea of rooftops."
SCENIC CORRIDORS
Many roadways i n the community provide views of scenic vistas, washes, and native vegetation. The
open feeling along some of these roadways also adds to the character of the community.
AIR QUALITY
Good airq Yualit has been recognized by Town residents as an essential component of Oro Valley's
quality of life. Air pollution reduces visibility and compromises views of surrounding mountain
q Y
ranges, as well as increases health risks. Although not totally within the Town's control, air pollution
can be reduced through Town initiatives.
11111
44,
77 Open Space and Natural Resources Conservation
Policy Document Oro ValleyGeneral eral Plan
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005)
GOALS AND POLICIES
NATURAL OPEN SPACE
11.1 To protect the environmentally sensitive open space areas within the Planning Area.
11.1.1 The Town shall institute a program for the acquisition, management, and maintenance of
public natural open space. This program may include a cost-benefit analysis to determine
natural open space acquisition priorities.
11.1.2 The program in Policy 11.1.1 shall identify and provide recommendations to the Town
Council for the application of a range of planning and funding tools to acquire, enhance,
,
manage, maintain, or otherwise protect environmentally sensitive lands and other desirable
natural open space lands such as those identified as SRA in this plan.
11.1.3The_Town_shall work with authorized representatives of approved Planned Area
Developments (PADs) to minimize impacts on environmentally sensitive lands, including
amendments of PADs, while allowing for development in accordance with the spirit of
existing approvals.
11.1.4 The Town shall require new development proposals, through the rezoningprocess, adjacent
to or containing riparian areas or wildlife and plant habitat to include provisions to link these
systems to other nearby riparian areas, habitats, existing or planned trails, and regional
natural open space areas (e.g., Tortolita Mountain Park, Catalina State Park, and Coronado
National Forest).
11.1.5 The Town shall ensure that recreational uses on areas with essential or key habitats are
designed to protect these resources. (See also Policy 8.1.1.)
11.1.6 The Town shall include interpretive elements with trails developed within natural
environments. These elements should be designed to provide educational information on
the environment and the protection of resources in an unobtrusive manner.
11.1.7The Town shall prepare, adopt, and periodically update an Natural
Open Space
p
Management Plan to determine the appropriate level of use and protection of the
environmentally sensitive open space areas within and surrounding the Town. This should
include preparation of an inventory of these areas and the natural resources they support.
(See also Policies 11.5.1, 11.5.2, and 11.5.3.)
11.1.8 The Town shall use natural open space preservation as one criterion in considering land use
rezoning proposals. Developments shall utilize natural open space to comply with
requirements for landscaped areas and buffer areas, whenever feasible.
11.1.9 The Town shall integrate open space planning with ongoing land use planning and
community development efforts.
11.1.10 The Town shall encourage natural open space connection to and the expansion of Tortolita
Mountain Park and Catalina State Park.
11.1.11 Protection techniques, such as clustering, transfer of development rights, and density
bonuses, which may increase the number of units in an area shall include standards to
ensure that other environmentally sensitive areas and existing neighborhoods are not
adversely affected. Where clustering is used to set aside areas as natural p
open space,ace the
3
Open Space and Natural Resources Conservation 78
Oro Valley General Plan Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005)
areas shall be dedicated to the Town, County, trust, or appropriate entity se -that will
guarantee preservation in perpetuity.
11.1.12 To achieve natural open space goals, emphasis needs to be focused upon avoiding pre-
annexation agreements with commitments that compromise community values.
HABITAT PROTECTION
11.2 Top rotect native biological habitats and their associated plant and wildlife species
throughout the Town of Oro Valley and create/restore habitats where feasible in
development design.
11.2.1 The Town shall ensure that development will provide for coordinated and enhanced
protection of key habitat areas. "Key habitat" and "essential habitat" are provided,
respectively, in Policy 11.2.2 and Policy 11.2.3.
11.2.2 The Town shall define key habitat areas as those that meet the following criteria:
■ significant saguaro stands;
■ significant ironwood stands; and,
■ significant rock outcrops.
Note: The term "significant" as it relates to each of these will be defined in ordinance.
11.2.3 The Town shall define essential habitat areas as those that meet one of the following criteria:
• areas occupied by special-status species as defined by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service or Arizona Game and Fish;
• riparian habitat types, defined as low xeroriparian, moderate xeroriparian, high
xeroriparian, hyd rori parian, mesoriparian (including mesquite bosque and degraded
mesquite bosque); and
• buffer areas around these areas.
11.2.4 Within essential habitats, The Town shall permit only the following uses:
• education and research;
• fish, wildlife and plant management activities;
• trails, scenic overlooks, and other passive recreation;
• necessary water supply projects which can be accomplished with minimal
environmental damage;
■ roadway crossings, drainage facilities, and other infrastructure which have been
designed to minimize environmental damage; and,
• environmental restoration/enhancement activities.
These uses shall be designed to minimize impacts on environmentally sensitive resources. An
exception to this is for lands covered under a habitat conservation plan or similar agreement.
that has been adopted and approved by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and/or Arizona
Game and Fish. Development in these areas can proceed based on the agreement and
applicable provisions of the Town's General Plan and zoning ordinance.
11.2.5 The Town shall maintain a current and accurate database of biological resources, including
mapsidentify that the locations of specific habitats (as defined in this element), and lists of
special-status species, to mandate environmentally compatible development. Upon
79 Open Space and Natural Resources Conservation
Policy Document Oro Valley General Plan
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005)
annexation of any area to the Town, the Town shall update the database for the annexation
p ton
area.
11.2.6 On sites that have reasonably high potential to contain essential or keyhabitats, or contain nor
support special-status species, the Town shall require the pp
project applicant to have the site
surveyed by a Town-qualified biologist as part of the applicationrocess. In addition, the
p
Town will maintain a list of qualified biologists experienced in Sonoran Desert ecosystems
that can be used to prepare these studies. The results of the survey will be used during the
development review and approval process in evaluating the merits of the project.
11.2.7The Town shall prepare, adopt, and implement an Environmentally Sensitive Lands
Ordinance (ESLO) containing standards for protectingsensitive resources and provisions for
innovative
requiring innovative site planning and design practices that wouldp rotect sensitive
resources. (See also Policy 11.4.3.)
11.2.8 The Town shall work as an equal partner with federal, state, and county agencies and the
public in the development and implementation of the Sonoran Desert Conservation Plan.
11.2.9 The Town shall require project designs that:
• place development in areas not defined as key habitat whenp ossible;
• provide deed restrictions regarding treatment of identified habitats and natural open
space on private property;
• minimize adverse impacts to these habitats;
• provide for connectivity between on- and off-site essential and key habitat areas; and,
• are designed to reduce overall habitat impacts.
11.2.10 The Town_shall achieve fauna and flora protection Y
g through regulatory practices as well as
through working partnerships with developers. On-site water detention basins, clustering,
land trusts, scenic easements, and similar practices should becomep art of an ordinance to
protect the plants and animals and still achieve land development objectives.
11.2.11 The Town shall protect and enhance contiguous areas of keyhabitats rather than small,
,
segmented remainder parcels.
11.2.12 For new public or private development projects, The Town shall require a buffer of
adequate size to protect the integrity of the essential habitat. Buffer size regulations will be
defined in the Town's ESLO (see Policy 11.2.7), which wille rovidguidance on buffer
p
sizes, based on site characteristics, such as terrain, width of habitat, habitat condition, and
so forth.
11.2.13 The Town shall regulate development within buffer areas in the same way as the habitat am
areas the buffer is protecting.
INA
11.2.14 The Town shall inventory and actively pursue opportunities to restore degraded areas that
contain remnants of essential or key habitat areas as defined in this element.
11.2.15 The Town shall continue to maintain a plant palette for use in all plans.e This list
shall use only drought-tolerant vegetation. The list shall not include any non-native plant
types that are considered invasive, allergenic, or nuisance Onlyspspecies. ecies
native plant s ecies
shall be allowed in perimeter areas or areas adjacent to natural areas. (See also Policy
12.3.2.)
Open Space and Natural Resources Conservation 80
Oro Valley General Plan Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 201 2005)
11.2. qthe protection The Town shall require of healthy native vegetation within a development. If
on-sitep rotection is not feasible, the Town shall encourage transplantation of healthy native
pp
vegetation to approved sites within, or as a less preferable option, outside the project limits.
11.2.17 The Town shall continue top rohibit mass grading for all residential developments with lots
exceeding 15,000 square feet and strongly discourage it throughout the community. (See
also Policy 1.1.6.)
11.2.18 The Town shall restrict the removal of gravel and other natural resources from washes and
flood-prone areas for commercial purposes. (See also Policy 12.1.5.)
11.2.19 The Town shall provide guidelines for the safe movement of wildlife above and below
roadways and through or around other man-made environments. (See also Policy 5.4.2.)
11.2.20 The Town shall continue to encourage utilization of the Town's Save-A-Plant program for
protection of healthy native vegetation.
VISUAL RESOURCES
11.3 To protect and enhance the visual character of the Town.
111 11.3.1 Viewp rotection is to be an essential aspect of development review and project approval. The
Town defines the following roadways as scenic corridors within Oro Valley:
■ Calle Concordia
• First Avenue
• La Canada Drive
• La Cholla Road
• Lambert Lane
■ Linda Vista Boulevard
• Moore Road
• Naranja Drive
■ Oracle Road
■ Palisades Road
• Rancho Vistoso Boulevard
■ Shannon Road
• Tangerine Road
Additional roads may be added to this list during the annexation process. This could include
roads that may not be annexed but would border the Town. (See also Policy 5.4.3.)
11.3.2 The Town shall continue to require all new development and improvements to existing
development, both public and private, to maintain and/or enhance the character and quality
of views from and along scenic corridors and public parks. The following measures will
contribute to achieving this objective:
• preserve areas of natural open space (especially habitat: areas) to provide visual relief;
• provide large natural or naturally landscaped areas in rights-of-way along scenic
corridors;
• create design standards to minimize the impacts of parking lots;
• create a Town ordinance that requires vehicle loads to be covered and secured;
81 Open Space and Natural Resources Conservation
Policy Document Oro Valley General Plan
Adopted May 29, 2003(revised May 20, 2005)
• work with utility providers to place utilities underground; and,
• discourage visually intrusive structures.
11.3.3 The Town_shall use existing standards and guidelines, and establish new ones as needed, to
ensure that the built environment blends with or enhances the natural environment by:
Y
■ placing utilities underground
• restricting light not needed for safety or identification
• restricting signage primarily to identification
■ creating landscaped breaks in parking lots, subdivisions, and other uses that extend
over large areas
(See also Policy 2.1.1.)
11.3.4 The Town shall protect air quality through:
• the enforcement of dust control measures
• restrictions to prohibit uses that create air pollution
• encouragement of gas versus wood fireplaces
■ working with PAG to promote rideshare
■ incentives to encourage the use of renewable resources such as solar and windp ower
• attracting "green" technologies, such as low emission commercial and industrial 3
development
• limits to mass grading, which shall require the approval of the Planningand Zoning
Administrator (See also policies under Goal 1.5.)
VISUALLY IMPORTANT AREAS
11.4 To protect visually important areas. (See also Goal 2.1.)
11.4.1 The Town shall define and map visually important areas, especially peaks and rides and
p Yridges,
highly visible sloped areas.
11.4.2 The Town_shall continue to actively pursue measures torotect and maintain night sky
g
visibility.
11.4.3 The Town shall prepare design guidelines and standards asart of an ESLO (see Policy
y
11.2.7) to protect scenic resources and direct site and building design in areas identified as
visually important. The ESLO may include, but not be limited to, the following.
g
• Placement of roadways
• Building materials, colors, and reflectivity
• Protection of ridgelines, slopes, and hillsides
• Integration of buildings and landscape with site features and vegetation,
• Placement of single- and two-story structures
■ Open space and landscape area requirements
• Standards for fencing and berming
■ Control of light and glare
• Limiting the areas that may be graded
• Limiting cuts and fills
• Treatment of disturbed areas, especially cut and fill slopes
Open Space and Natural Resources Conservation 82
Oro Valley General Plan Policy Document
Adopted May 29,2003 (revised May 20,2005)
PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT
11.5 To develop aspace holistic natural opens ace and natural resource conservation program.
11.5.1 The Town shall
establish an advisorycommittee to provide the Town Council and Planning
annual recommendations and
Commission with input regarding Town-initiated actions and
incentivesprotect to environmentally sensitive lands in the Town and to
monitor/recommend modifications to this element. The advisory committee's efforts are to
be coordinated with
the recommendations of the Natural Open Space Management Plan
prepared pursuant to Policy 11.1 .7.
11.5.2 The advisory committee described under Policy 11.5.1 shall establish and annually review an
that will identifyprogram components,action plan p including but not limited to the g
following:
• Expected revenues to administer the program
■ Areas for acquisition (listed by priority)
111 • Areas for enhancements
■ Support for land trust activities
■ A yearlyreport including: how much natural open space is in the Town, its
status g
health, its protection, and its connectivity; how existing natural open space should be
used; and the status of maintenance and management of natural open space
for inclusion in the action plan described under Policy 11.5.2, the advisory
11.5.3 In selecting lands
committee shall utilize the following general guidelines:
■ Availability of land
■ Potential development pressures on land
■ Potential for protection of a sensitive area or corridor
111 ■ Connectivity to other natural areas
• Biological and cultural richness or diversity
■ Economic sustainability of the Town
1 • Consistency with the General Plan
11.5.4 The Town s p
hall adopt a set of best available practices to minimize impacts to the Town's
open space system.
hall continue to inform project applicants about the natural resources in Oro
11.5.5 The Town s
Valley andthe practices that are required to protect these resources.
• 11.5.6 The Town shall establish
guidelines for tradingnatural open spaces that allow those trades
that create interconnected, high-quality natural open space.
11.5.7The Town shall explore establishing
II a funding source to provide for environmental education.
11.5.8 The Town shall
continuouslyinform and educate the public about the natural and cultural
resources andthe steps in Oro Valley ste s that they can take to help protect, enhance, restore,
and enjoy these resources.
support educational programs to promote environmental awareness and
11.5.9 The Town shall p g
natural resource conservation. It should include the public benefits that can be derived
from a community open space system.
OP
fit
83 Open Space and Natural Resources Conservation
I
Policy Document Oro Valley General Plan
Adopted May 29, 2003(revised May 20, 2005)
11.5.10 The Town shall monitor public use in designated natural areas within the
g community to
prevent the degradation of significant biological and visual resources.
11.5.11 The Town shall continue to explore strategies that would enable preservation of lands
extending north and west from Honey Bee Canyon/Sausalito Creek and connecting ecting to the
Tortolita Mountain Park through independent methods and through coordination anon with
Pima County, Arizona State Land Department, Arizona State Parks Board, and/or/or any
nationally recognized conservation organization.
—3...."%s4)011116*....„
111
Open Space and Natural Resources Conservation 84
Oro Valley General Plan Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005)
12.WATER RESOURCES
STATEMENT
The Town of Oro Valley recognizes the importance of water to maintain the natural qualities that
attract people to the area and sustain their existence. The Town also recognizes the importance of
ensuring that it doesn't compromise these qualities. The Water Resources Element presents goals and
policies that address water as both a natural asset and as an essential part of the public infrastructure.
GROWING SMARTER/PLUS REQUIREMENTS
The basic intent of the Growing Smarter/Plus requirements for the Water Resources Element is to
ensure that communities can assure that there will be enough water to support future development.
111
The required content is as follows:
• Assessment of known legally and physically available surface water, groundwater and
reclaimed water supplies.
■ The demand for water that will result from future growth, added to existing uses.
• An analysis of how the demand for water that will result from future growth projected in the
general plan will be served by the currently available water supplies or a plan to obtain
additional necessary water supplies.
As with many other aspects of the Growing Smarter/Plus statutes, the Water Resources Element
requirements are geared toward growing communities.
Kir POLICY Issues
IMPACTS TO THE NATURAL DRAINAGE RECHARGE SYSTEM
The Town has been designated by the State of Arizona as having a 100-year assured water supply.
However, this does allow draw down of the aquifer to a depth of 1,000 feet below land surface
within that time. Thus development activities in Oro Valley may adversely impact the natural wash
system and continued regulation is needed. Cumulative, as well as site-by-site, impacts need to be
considered.
PROTECTION OF WELLHEADS
Wellheads for domestic water could be adversely affected by development activities occurring in
close proximity to well sites.
WATER CONSERVATION
Even though the Town has a 100-year assured water supply, water needs to be conserved to balance
continued growth, to enhance ecosystems that use surface water, and to protect ecosystems that
depend on groundwater. Cumulative, as well as site-by-site, impacts need to be considered.
SURFACE WATER AVAILABILITY/TRANSMISSION
While the Town has secured rights to surface water from the Central Arizona Project (CAP), the
infrastructure to transport the water to the Town's current and future users is not in place. If the
Town is to shift away from its sole reliance on groundwater for potable domestic supply, transmission
facilities must be planned and constructed. Currently, the nearest point of supply for CAP water is
85 Water Resources
Policy Document Oro ValleyGeneral Plan
Adopted May29, 2003 (revised May20, 2005
�
near Tangerine Road and 1-10, which is several miles west and approximately 1,000 feet lower in
elevation.
USE OF RECLAIMED WATER FOR IRRIGATION
The Town has signed an agreement with the City of Tucson to secure rights to reclaimed water
(treated wastewater) generated within Oro Valley. This water may be used to
replace potable
p
supplies for irrigation of turf areas in town (e.g., golf courses, parks). The Town must design and
construct a system for transmitting this water to these users.
GOALS AND POLICIES
WATER RESOURCE PRESERVATION
12.1 To protect and restore the natural qualities of creeks, washes, and groundwater basins
and recharge areas in Oro Valley to ensure public health and safety biological
the biological
productivity and diversity of these water courses.
12.1.1 The Town shall require that natural washes (defined as riparian areas and ear
floodways) 100-year
be kept free from development that would adversely impact floodwaycapacity
ca p Y
or characteristics, natural/riparian areas, water quality, or natural groundwater recharge
areas.
12.1.2 The Town shall implement the Town's Floodplain Management Ordinance and requirements
of the Town's Drainage Manual.
12.1.3 The Town shall continue to evaluate all public and private development projects to
determine the effects of the projects on on-site and downstream drainage patterns and
associated ecological systems. Cumulative, as well as site-by-site, impacts shall be
considered.
12.1.4 As appropriate, the Town shall continue to require detention facilities and/or velocity
reduction when necessary to maintain existing storm flows and velocities in natural drainage
systems.
12.1.5 The Town shall restrict the commercial extraction of gravel and other natural resources from
washes and flood-prone areas. (See also Policy 11.2.18.) The Town shall ensure that flood
control facilities are designed to use "soft" channel structures. Facilities in natural washes
and floodways shall comply with Policy 12.1.1.
12.1.6 The Town shall continue to enforce stormwater controls to prevent aquifer pollution and the
erosion or siltation of washes.
12.1.7 The Town shall continue to protect wells from adverse conditions.
ALTERNATIVE WATER SUPPLIES
12.2 To utilize alternatives to groundwater to the maximum extent feasible.
12.2.1 The Town shall contribute to and/or participate in partnership with other jurisdictions to build
a conveyance system to make use of CAP water and treated wastewater. A variety of
funding sources, including alternative water surcharges, development fees and user fees
should be used to defray the costs of developing alternative water source delivery systems.
NI
....--- 4,....,41101111%......
Water Resources 86
L
Oro Valley General Plan Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005)
12.2.2 The Town shall require the utilization of CAP water and reclaimed water for recharge and
of areas such asparks and golf courses to reduce the Town's dependence on
irrigation
groundwater resources.
12.2.3 The Town shall encourage public and private developments to use alternative water sources.
12.2.4 The Town. using
shall consider CAP water and/or reclaimed water in the development of
=
multi-use recharge facilities (i.e., recharge, recreation, and habitat creation).
12.2.5 The Town shall monitor the use of CAP water to ensure that:
• r l washes do not exceed natural, average,Flows into natural historic levels a
• Groundwater quality is maintained per standards established by Arizona Department
of Environmental Quality.
4 ■ The use of water does not encourage nuisances.
pursue Town shall a combination of reclaimed water and CAP water infrastructure to
minimize costs and maximize alternative source delivery.
12.2.7 The Town shall meet all State and Federal regulations regarding the treatment, quality, and
monitoring required with the use of reclaimed water to assure that its use does not pose
health dangers.
WATER RESOURCE CONSERVATION
12.3 To ensure water conservation.
12.3.1 The Town shall promote water conservation through a variety of techniques such as:
■ g
Desig nin detention basins for water harvesting as well as storm water control and
recreation
• Restoring disturbed areas and designing landscape to encourage infiltration and
reduce erosion
■ Requiring the use of low-water-use landscape using xeriscape techniques
• g
Develo in guidelines and standards for water harvesting in all forms of development
Developing
■ Educating landowners on water harvesting techniques
■ Providing incentives for conservation in water pricing structures
• Developing programs for water conservation in homes and businesses
• Tracking and reporting annually on the success of water conservation programs
■ gkey Identifying recharge zones for preservation and protection from development
Y
■ g
Ado tin turf water reclamation standards for larger turf areas such as golf courses,
Adopting
schools, and ball fields
■ g building Adopting codes and providing incentives for water conserving plumbing such
p
as gray water systems
12.3.2 The Town shall continue to require the use of drought-tolerant vegetation (as specified in the
Town's p adopted plant palette) and water efficient irrigation systems in the approval of new
pg
developments. Native vegetation is preferred in landscaping projects and the use of turf is
discouraged. (See also Policy 11.2.15.)
12.3.3 The Town shall require new development, expansion, and rehabilitation projects to include
water conservation measures.
87 Water Resources
Policy Document Oro Valley General Plan
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005)
12.3.4 The Town shall closely monitor the use of decorative water features such as fountains in
commercial, common areas, and multi-family they recycle
developments to ensure that
p
water and are designed to reduce water losses.
12.3.5 The Town shall encourage water conservation and retrofittingprograms for existing p g str uctures
and landscaped areas.
ail
*�r
Water Resources 88
Oro Valley General Plan Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003 irevised May 20, 20051
13. ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING
The b
Environmental Planning Element differs from the balance of this General Plan's elements in that its
p
focus is introspective.ectiveIts purpose, as described below, is to ensure that the goals and policies outlined
this General Plan and the actions that will be taken in implementing the General Plan do not
in
compromise
the environmental resources of the community. In that respect, the Element is analytical
rather thanp p Accordingly,tive. According)y, the content of the Element focuses on evaluating the Town's
commitment to environmental quality.
GROWING SMARTER/PLUS REQUIREMENTS
The Growing Smarter/Plus statutes require municipalities with 10,000 or more residents to include an
Environmental Planning Element addressing the following items:
■ policies Analysis, and strategies to address anticipated effects, if any, of general plan elements
on aira yualit , water quality and natural resources associated with proposed development
under the general plan.
• Theolicies and strategies to be developed under this element shall be designed to have
p
community-wide applicability and shall not require the production of an additional
environmental impact statement or similar analysis beyond the requirements of state and
federal law.
These requirements are intended to force communities to consider the overall environmental
implications of theirgeneral plans, with a specific focus on air quality, water quality, and natural
p
resources. As
suggested bythe second bullet, the Environmental Planning Element is the means for
the community to assess these implications in lieu of preparing a separate environmental assessment
such as is required for federal projects under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) or those
required in other states, such as the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
GENERAL PLAN POLICY APPROACH TO MITIGATING ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
The Town's basic approach to addressing potential environmental issues associated with
development under the General Plan Land Use Map is to pre-empt potential problems through
.
application ication of the Plan's policies. While this "self-mitigating" approach relies on the policies of
pp
virtually all elements of the Plan, it is particularly reliant on the Land Use, Open Space and Natural
Resources, and Water Resources Element. These three elements include policies that address the
three environmental issues that Growing Smarter/Plus identifies (i.e., air quality, water quality, and
natural resources). Adherence to these policies, coupled with the Town's ongoing implementation of
programs related to these three elements, ensures the protection of the Planning Area's valuable
environmental resources.
AIR QUALITY
Various sections of this Plan articulate the Town's policy commitment to maintaining and improving
good air qualityin Oro Valley, but the sections with the most influence on air quality issues are the
Land Use Element'sg oals and policies related to Land Use and Air Quality (page 21); the
Transportation and Circulation Element's goals and policies intended to provide for a balanced
y
transportation system, and thus reduction in reliance on the automobile; and the Open Space and
Natural Resource Conservation Element's policy related to protection of air quality (Policy 11.3.4 on
89 Environmental Planning
Policy Document
Oro Valley General Plan
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005)
page 82). Through consistent application of these policies, the Town will ensure that
development
called for under this Plan does not compromise Oro quality.
s Valley' air .
WATER QUALITY
The Water Resources Element of this Plan (beginning page 79) highlights
g g on p gwater quality issues in
Oro Valley and includes a variety of Town policycommitments ensuringthat water
Planningismaintained.
quality in the
Area maintained.
NATURAL RESOURCES
Oro Valley's natural resources are a point of pride for Town residents, as well as an important
element of the Town's economic health and well-being. The Town's commitments
g to protecting the
Planning Area's natural features are described in the Open Space and Natural Resources Element of
this General Plan.
Environmental Planning 90
Oro Valley General Plan Policy Document
Adopted May 29,2003 (revised May 20, 2005)
GLOSSARY
Average Daily Traffic: The average traffic volume on a roadway segment under average weekday
conditions.
Contiguous: In closeproximity; neighboring; adjoining; near in succession; in actual close contact;
g
touchingata point or along a boundary; bounded or traversed by. (Black's Law Dictionary, 5th
Edition.)
Floor-Area Ratio (FAR): A floor-area ratio is the ratio of the gross building square footage permitted on a
lot to the net square footage of the lot. For example, a floor-area ratio of 0.25 applied to a one-acre
(43,560 sq. ft.) lot, with no other requirements (e.g., set-backs), would allow a gross building with
10,890 sq. ft.
Functional Classification: A system to describe the various types of roadways by their primary purpose.
ClassificationstYp icallY describe not only the number of lanes, but also the types of access permitted to
the roadway.
40.
General Plan: A municipal or county planning document consisting of text policies and corresponding
ea
maps that is general, comprehensive, and long-range in nature. The State ofArizona requires
p
municipalities and counties in Arizona to have a General Plan, with certain required elements,
g upongrowth
depending the size and growth rate of the municipality or county. A general plan may also be
known as a "comprehensive plan , "master plan , "city plan or"county plan".
Goal: The ultimatep
pur ose of an effort stated in a way that is general in nature and immeasurable. Goals
are notq uantifiable, time-dependent, or suggestive of specific actions for achievement. There is at least
one
eneral plan goal per element, with more than one goal per element where appropriate or
g
OR necessary. Goals often refer to one or more aspects of the vision and incorporate specific values. They
are typically presented as "to"statements.
Growing Smarter: Legislation enacted by the State of Arizona in 1998 modifying existing general plan
. .
requirements and placingadditional general plan requirements on Arizona municipalities and
q
counties. Theg eneral plan requirements vary by population size and/or population growth rate.
Growing Smarter/Plus: Additional legislation enacted by the State of Arizona in 2000 that modifies and
supplements the Growing Smarter legislation.
Growth Area: An area deemed suitable for infrastructure expansion, improvements designed to support a
variety of land uses and, if appropriate, planned multi-modal transportation.
IP
Implementation Measure: An action, procedure, program, or technique that carries out general plan
policy.. Im lementation measures also specify primary responsibility for carrying out the action and a
time frame for its accomplishment. Collectively, the general plan's implementation measures will
constitute the Town's General Plan Implementation Program.
Land Use Designation: The allowed type and intensity of development specified in a general plan.
Typically, the land use designation is defined in the text and shown graphically on a land use map.
specify may residential uses (e.g., low density residential) and non-residential uses (e.g.,
parks/open space,ace, commercial),with each specifying land use intensity standards.
Land Use Intensity Standards: Standards of population density and building intensity for each land use
designation. Standards of building intensity for residential uses are stated in this Genera/ Plan in terms
of the allowable range of dwelling units per acre. Standards of population density for residential uses
IPm be r of
can be derived by multiplying the maximum number of dwellings per acre by the average n u
91 Glossary
Policy Document Oro Valley General Plan idi
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 2005)
persons per dwelling unit. Standards of building intensity for non-residential uses are stated in terms of
maximum allowable floor-area ratios (FARs).
Level of Service (LOS): A measure of congestion based on the comparison of a roadway's traffic volume
Y
with its capacity. The standard means for measuring the amount of traffic that a roadway or
intersection can accommodate, based on such factors as maneuverability, driver dissatisfaction, and
delay, is level of service. This is also the measure most often used to express local policyconcerning
acceptable levels of congestion on a community's streets. Measures range from "A" through "F" based
g g
on the Transportation Research Board's publication Highway Capacity Manual 2000.
Major Amendment: According to the State's Growing Smarter/Plus statutes [ARS §9-461.06.G] "major
amendment" means a substantial alteration of the municipality's land use mixture or balance as
established in the municipality's existing general plan land use element. Each community's
general
plan defines what constitutes a "major amendment".
Minor Amendment: A minor amendment is defined as any text or map change that does not meet the
criteria for a major amendment.
Open Space: Any area of natural open space (as defined below) or any disturbed area that has been
supplemented by additional plantings or topping materials. This may openspace
recreational s ace
such as parks and playgrounds.
Open Space, Natural: Any natural, undisturbed area.
Planning Area: The planning area is the geographic area covered bythe General Plan. For a municipality,
p ty,
the planning area typically includes the municipality's limits (incorporated boundary) as well as areas
p ry
that will potentially be annexed to the municipality.
Policy: A course of action that the Town shall take to implement theoal to which it relates. When
g
policies are followed and consistently applied, they work to implement the community's vision for the
future.
Roadway Classifications: The allowed types of roadways specified in a general plan. Typically, the
classifications. are defined in the text and shown graphically on a circulation Designations map.
pmay
range from local streets to federal highways, with each specifying roadway standards
Roadway Standards: For each roadway classification, there are standardsgthe rescribin preferred right-
of-way pg
of-way width, number of lanes, lane widths, medians, landscaped areas, bike lanes, and multi-modal
paths.
TradeLAs used vin Polia,__1.1_ 3,a trade is the d1gntinLa developdevelopable area_as o..,ens_space to offset a
loss ofnatural_opensTace Trade areas must beat least a 1:1 ratio with habitat value at least equal to
the area lost (based on_.plant types, sizes,and densities) ibittkemeenhancedjor natural
or disturbed_areas„bf addinz native__ tants.___In addition the trade areas should contain_open a_p_ac , 3
which_meets the following or similar, criteria: reduces fra_,mentation_has recreational value improves
overallroject design, or creates buffers adjacent to environmentally sensitive areas.
Urban Services Boundary: The Land Use Mapdelineates an Urban Services
Boundary (USB) around
most of the Planning Area. The area outside of the USB indicates land that should not receive any
increase in density or land use intensity over what currently exists because urban infrastructure has not
yet been extended into these areas and is not planned for the foreseeable future.
Zoning, Zoning Code: The formal regulations for the administration and implementation of the general
plan which divide a city or county into zones specifying allowable uses and building restrictions within
the zones. The zones may also be known as districts or areas.
Glossary 92
Oro Valley General Plan Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20,2005)
Zoning A specific ecific area of a city or county that has proscribed land use requirements, such as land
usetyp e and development standards (e.g., minimum lot size, set-backs, building design, landscaping).
The districts may also be known as zones or areas.
44.
I.
11410
4.
O.
OW
OA
1,0
93 Glossary
Policy Document Oro Valley General Plan
Adopted May 29,2003 (revised May 20, 2005)
SUPPLEMENTAL REPORTS AND DOCUMENTATION
To supplement this Policy Document, the Town has prepared a variety of reports that establish the
framework for preparation of the General Plan, as well as documenting the process that the Town
completed in preparing the Plan. This includes the following reports, which have been published
separately and are available through the Town of Oro Valley Community Development Department.
None of these reports are being adopted as a formal part of the General Plan and thus will not be
subject to ratification by the public vote.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ACTION PLAN
The Town of Oro Valley made a serious commitment to public involvement through the preparation
of its General Plan Update 2001 Public Participation Action Plan. The Plan outlined a broad range of
outreach tools and mechanisms that the Town employed to engage the Town's key stakeholders in
the Update process. Among the methods that the Town used were a community interest survey that
was conducted early in the process and series of public meetings and workshops that were held
throughout the planning process.
GENERAL PLAN BACKGROUND REPORT
This report is a compilation of the secondary source information provided by the Town and other
sources during the General Plan Update process. This information was gathered, analyzed and
summarized in order to establish a baseline inventory and assessment of natural and man-made
conditions in the Town. The report contains text, tables and figures addressing the following major
topics: natural resources; land use; transportation; community facilities; population; and economics.
FISCAL MODEL SUMMARY
During the General Plan Update process, a fiscal model was used to assist in making decisions about
various land use alternatives. The model provided estimates of the impact of alternative land use
scenarios on the Town's finances, particularly the general fund. These estimates were based on an
analysis of the Town's recent finances and development activity, as well as discussions with department
managers.
The Town's recent analysis of potential annexations was used as the starting point for the General Plan
Update fiscal impact model. Subsequently, the model was expanded and refined to account for
additional factors, provide additional flexibility, and to enable modeling of multiple geographic areas
simultaneously. The model was developed in an iterative manner, with refinements occurring as
necessary and requested by Town staff, the General Plan Update Steering Committee, and interested
Town residents.
The model provides a tremendous amount of information at a detailed departmental and geographic level
and on an annual basis. These results were summarized into totals at the end of the twenty-year period,
from fiscal year 2002-03 (FY02-03) to fiscal year 2022-23 (FY22-23).
The first runs of the model were used to evaluate the economic sustainability of the alternative land use
scenarios. The final run of the fiscal model was made to evaluate the Town Council's draft land use plan.
To ensure that the economic health of the Town did not depend on future annexations, the final run
evaluated the expected revenues and expenditures for areas within the current Town boundaries
separately from those areas outside the Town boundaries. The results for the 20-year period are
summarized below:
Supplemental Reports and Documentation 94
Oro Valley
General Plan Policy Document
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May 20, 200.1
Area Cumulative Surplus Comments
ment built out. Commercial
Residential development Within Town $ 166 million p
development largely built out. Some industrial areas not
developed. Annual net surplus of $2 million in the
short-term increasing to $11 million as the commercial
areas are developed.
Outside Town Depends on when When fully built out and annexed this area would
annexed. provide an annual net surplus of $4.5 million.
impact model shows that the land use plan provides for the economic health of the
In summary, the fiscal
Town even without annexations.
FUTURE SEARCH CONFERENCE SUMMARY
Future Search Conferences were established as a method for generating broad public participation,
duringwhich members of a communitycan meet, discuss, debate, and set the community's path to
the
future. The October 27, 2001 Conference was the first public event to kick-off the update of
Focus 2020. It was established as a visioning workshop in which attendees were encouraged to
x lore the Town'spast and present, and to look to the future within a framework of sustainability.
explore
The one hundred and twenty-seven citizens who attended the conference identified important
communityissues and values. The results of the conference as described in this report were used to
help identify the vision statement for the Update 2020 General Plan.
FOCUS GROUP MEETINGS SUMMARY
The intent of the Focus Group Meetings was to direct the attention of Oro Valley residents to the
essential issues facing the community. The meetings were organized thematically to address related
Y
groups of the elements, namely:
p
Open Op Space, Natural February 13, 2002 Biological Resources
Resources & Environment Open Space
Water Resources
Visual Resources
Circulation & Public February 25, 2002 Roads & Streets
Services Public Safety, Facilities & Services
Transit
Parks, Recreation & Culture February 26, 2002 Parks & Recreation
Cultural & Historic Resources
Trails & Open Space
Land Use, Housing & March 4, 2002 Land Use
Economic Development Economic Development
Housing
Community Design n Forum March 25, 2002 Alternative Land Use Maps
95 Supplemental Reports and Documentation
Policy Document Oro ValleyGeneral Plan
�
Adopted May 29, 2003 (revised May20, 2005
The Focus Group Meetings consisted of three basic parts. The first was apresentation of background
information relevant to the subject(s) of the meeting; the second was a set of small groupexercises
where participants discussed the issues and policies related to the topic; and the third was a set et of
presentations of the results of the small group exercises.
OTHER SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
Open House #1: Public Comments is a compilation of the comments received in the Open House on May
y
20, 2002.
The December 2001 Telephone Survey provided the community preferences related to a wide range of
topics from growth to transportation to funding options for Town services. Four hundred and three
persons completed the survey.
The January 2002 Progress Report on the 1996 General Plan
Program Strategic Implementation provides
g p
information of the success of the Town in implementing the previous General Plan. The report
indicates that, of the 94 action items, 65 (70%) were completed or g
ong oin , 23 (24%) were started and
underway and six were not started.
REFERENCED DOCUMENTS
Throughout this Plan, a variety of references are made to other documents that contribute to the
understanding of the Plan or assist in articulating the Plan's commitments. Following are several such
documents that are available for review at the Town's Community Development Office.
Arizona, State of, Growing Smarter/Plus Statutes, Arizona Revised Statutes (ARS) §9-461.05, et seq.
q
Oro Valley, Town of, Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised
Oro Valley, Town of, Design Guidelines, Chapter 16 of Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised
Oro Valley, Town of, Community Economic Development Strategy, September 1997.
Oro Valley, Town of, Transit Development Plan, Fiscal Years 2003 To 2012, November 2002.
Sonoran Institute, Building from the Best of Tucson, May 2001
Supplemental Reports and Documentation 96
' Oro Valley General Plan Policy Document
Adopted May 29,2003 (revised May 20, 2005)
1
111
IP
97 Supplemental Reports and Documentation
N
cm
is
in
I F- -O a) 101
OC -C Cis • a)_ +r 4-, cn Q )
> -0 a) N A
( as
si EL_) O N .Q E ai
Ti U
.0 > L
U N
C O Q a) E E
—CO • a) • •E as
-C CL C 0 O Q u- o C
a)
2 7,, it= 57-a) _ a) a) 0 •E 2
a. -as o
a_
Q o c c� L C 9- U I- a) To'
ca
ct o a) a) O a) ca ..c
• N 0 C 'a' -0 F-- L .
a) a) a) a) O
O +'
Q oa) � � ,, a) a) a) 0
Ce II N o ..
o -Ti
O. C ?+`+- C N C
co a, o cn � ooE o
Z d- C � 5 0—• NU)
O o > o — o QO a) u)
o :0C U _
U C2 C .� a)
N -� j con Q. a) vCD
5 2 C 0)
1— .o a) Q 0 2 'o L >; - -o a
O .9-- C
O '.' C o .--• .0 = i U O a)
U) N C
W •S
LC) a) o o C0- . E coO
J , p V C co a) p a) _cO L O
0. ..+O O •• Q•- C j o >, U
2 cz
_ ,E N Q a) -0 0)-C E a) > U O
0 C C O N O N • ' }' Q a) `n
U 0 C = 0 0s) L -(5)
E 4O ai a) U • o0
CZ � �-' ° _C to o E C a) �
C N
W .2 C �_ c al
al (13
C c- > o
1— .5 .u) a) *E a) � o R u) uj O Q Q U � � � � o � •a) a) �
V •- a) v C Z3 a) .O L ocii
Z3 5, O O 4-- a) Q O U as , a) C
Z • •
.0 E UU o co a) E v .Q c,3 O co ro
N
U
Q Q) C L C L Q .0 L V '>
o ..•., L
..J 4-S N u) O cn cn 2 cn O >,•c E .0 0 o 13 U)
w-- c -0 O C t� to U 4-, ♦.. U i a) To cn U
a- O 2 O a) O +r CO — L O .0 -a a) N
u) to :� f) cn E •v w — C. 0) a-
all < C • U a U E. o ' cn C 12 lag
•u) •= as s
Q/ 7,1 C 4- �, L 4- •- U 0 a) 0) .r<
Ti; 3
li. .-1'C 0 — 0 0 o •••i a) Q, t�) O cv -RE a) C
W C 0 L C
N �U-. 5 - a) tU o-.U- t6 CO
Z •a) a) o O C C o ♦••,, N C
IIII O
0 � -e 4.- m a) C ,2 oo `oo '' C ca" 0 a)
0 .0 --F,
-oc0- C = mc ‘1..
)
W _
'L co Q) (n U) 0) C L L a)
J was
o Q � o m o �c c .Y •- �� c c a"i r a.
Q 0 C O— 0C O C s- O o --- a) U a,
d7 U Q O O p O O L c6 c-
U ca
0 ca a) +_ C L C - V) "t N
W 2 E U) a) a) O O a) a) •C •
c E p L
O C O co a) € U o a3 00 0 �' eL
O L 0i
O O),,,r V O = Q C 4 t3) " L _ C
LL ,-- 2Ej •oU ca) .- co• � � ° g . '- O
C C a) o — — F- E .c a) c 2 0) 0
u Z O O = -C o + •� .� 0) O a) 0) o W
c UO - i- ccf) - a) C- 1-...) -0
0 J N
C },as � a) U � � .� L O o__a +rte- � O
U 0 C C 4= a O +r E C O co L E
a) co
II a) CU 0
a) a) ca ♦-' a) a) a) a) o
_C Z o . a) -C -C CCD ! i2ogaE >, o N — o € 0
.n �=. U � p.. o a) n) o • .� o
U ct
_ - _ I a) �•
a�j C N - C Q .Q 4>-- C L U
+, a) cn O o L C 4? ca I
LF•- WO i_ .0a) • 0
o tea) }' caa) .� � U - � � i = I' � i--- C O
73 0 ui cu a -C '— C -C ° U O CU a) 0) CD O C f
cn I- a) CM U U •C Uii, Q. O Q O c. 0 0 .c a) C
< Z i- Q w2 -0 w cacti I�•• .E I- a � .� cn2 ° O i2
�t — F- l
N
a)
C CD
,
ICO
rtS i a) 0) CD O I Z0 LL ~ O E"
O O
O C C C m
22
>..
73
>, C c
c -� Nc p c o I c O
a-as
ca •_ cies O Q = Q oE o E o UaQ .�En o > Ea) c �0 c Uo Ua) o .c
s
+-+ J ccp Ito
O c D L
o � �WE . cmc° oc -�
cu W- v� o c2. cn o a
E OC > u) co o c CO N co C
a) N a) c Q = o a)Uj cu :E
N -0 1 L _ _O
L
83 "tA
(a O O Lo
i ,o i�. • L N al > = 2 C 2 cn-
O
u) E S 5 11) (2 -0 •
C COQ. : _cCOOQ CT� � Q )
U _� trb +• a) _ 7
Ts • c/ CO 0 u) O 73 0 0 5
I
0_ > co " U) ', 'C U E C O
:- o c a c c13Q O � I Q c
C C O (t3 a•-, O O- (o p (o
E a) ca 4 ! M U ..a' a) cn U Y a) O
E p >,-,to • c c _ u) O U C M
1.7; Tu W p E. al E c..q a) (D c V c Q c�
CLC •� = a) cnE U U O
O O a) C O c c 90 C a) Cl.) -t a)
L C 0 N S2 a) 0 ..-, O -0
-0 > c) c I .0U c o_ 0 N .2 E a3 t3 Qo _c cn
L' CA L .C C
N W C Q co p O .O N - O O O
C O O , ..5 > co �• N cn
CU c CO 0 4-, � cv -C C �a)••`� a)
CO C a) O a) c 0a) O 0 Q O U
- O "0 CU •`t' -C L� CO.c E , ca I ..c I 73 � N
El_) 0 1 - Cli ++ Z3 ++ (U C a.
� -a a) D I •Cg10cua o- p-0U -0 •C
C � Q0p , .c � cLaa 1 -c > (D � � a 0 •_
>. � � 3 -E- • + aoi � o� u j 3 � C I Q. L c
U `CD � 73 s -. =p , a) C •cn >,•cn >,O o.L c ci
ca
O 2 - Q. O1 Cl) a3 p a)
C Qcn
0 .. , CO 0p C •C (no , O O C a) -a OC
.3 O RS (ZS a, O- c O U) C O U .cn O "p Q Cl) c
E N C -0 ( U O O E C U >,(o C
`� •.? pOn -( � �' Q. .� c
H
Oxo O „-c
o E
cin U - O
D cin Cfl Q
-0 C co LC) I C•)
CJ T- _MS C
J O p r-- '- - Nal
13
N-- r--
s m N �M N (Yj _r' tl
C 4-, � V.-'47-N O `- r-d � N
J E _O ' r- 1- N r- r'▪ N N
C
t.C) rr _ter— T— e-- C
- C Q, CY) N •N Imo- N •. N N` r- .►-•
r- U
(/) v 7 • N _ P°-
_,` N6
Z •- 3 — �• o ,- I N N •
w
O SCJ v) n- N.- - N COCO � p
.� • - _ _ CO I N I - v)
I. r 73 •a � N7NONM CO �- N- t O
ci EC ._ N I � IcriCL
L Q r- r- r- �- r..• I i M r- r c-
L. s;1 c 0 r- _r-- _ 7 1 N I i •_: •• O r- I O
Q
0. _� I
a) W E er=r- ,- � o� I co ! I
� Nr- N>+ V) C,� U `fir- Nr- NNN I N ti (�j _M r- I a-
M 7 _
!a) 0.0 r- O_ _ON- rN- r-- r. I N I V- r-▪r C7 I (n
i > Q C I �- r(V �- r I t--
Ia) Z .§ `' L I 0
Q m I 1 LU
cu C cL� .Q N M �. O Q
I Ce
C C� E --I J I _=.1 J I CI
Q Z i I i Q.
1
co
a)
(3)
co
0
L a) a) L 0) E
co c a) FO-- a) a) F— F— c 1 a).'-•
o
11. •o - E F- I- E E C F- o F-
O 0 O '2 '2 C O C O
E O 'a s ..c -n -v 0 _0 r
H 2 2 a)
C C •CE •CC C C C C U
— c ▪C N c
t.4 E 0 o O N N N O o11 �o
N N N N o� 0
Mum _
� o�S o2S 05 oZS �S �S
= O) 0) 0) 0) .0 O) cB
0) �
■i Q C C C C C C C•_ -_-6, C .0
0. N 'c 'c 'C c E ▪c cm C a)
c c C c c c c C a
W ca co co co co co ci3 co
>, '- 4-' a)co a) a� O
• . a=r.
irn'co a) .4 o C L U) -0
�'4 ' (0 O c c Ecow:• ,-i oa) Via) � a L o . o 0c
I :' L- 13 O a) L (D _
,..., _ , T12 -c‘ a)
po
Q) C Cl)+.' 0
•, 4D O O a) a) U a. O
•'i � .7)C7 `i coQ O (� Q O O (Ni cA
L •' a 3 C C ` O E cn a► a.
W-0 moa' rn U " ' a)•a) +. a) a) U) CZ a J
C d-„ L > •� C - L W a C (t c L
•! 1 •5 cn i g.'L N C
cn
CV) C1• O a)
(1)� • f 0 0 Oci- .+_ C a) CL � 4i1 p al O C0 Z � O O
5 . 1
U cp
a
N `0. N cn a-) '
C
N
• UC . N co6 . O c
N a) OU '' L 4 U NN O
4� ::,..,11•R . 2 O N CUaO O .. . NQ ' Oaa)
—4 O. 'OC L6 4,
• ' � / OM
(D' . N O= C N a) u
E can) c ) Ccm oQ >, �
R
i Uo ru a > cnC • O O
> 'in Cti cnaC )Q aaQ � .
v, • , :L.)4.6 . Tj• o
3 a) O
a) U C
O "Oi '- Oa) CO La) u CU a) XNN • to
�E � � �a) a � L ZO - � C N co (1) C
0 •• C C 0
' P,15iT _ E 0 -0 0 _O V L , , N C 0 C •(--,3N . VO _
L �O •
•► •' pO > a) O
I , c a a • C c 0 O
0.
a
o as
4.
a
i 4.-.-o a. +,C O c ON L. C C U
>-.
. 0
N{!Oi Q
! N L a)
13a) ' n CLO C n2Oi aO ' � >+a) a)
0., S
C > 0
'VOZ t = .0 tLfp a) Ca •iis
•i 01.51 • p n _ O Q ...-
CU
a)•. U cd-t > > c U C � aa) , ;- ` - ) C• LO — 3 a) • , a► C Q >�a r}=wL c
• `yC OO ca O cc c a► a► •
.- L C Li.
CD
GI C U
+-•
as
Cas •; ,, �, a) a) . _ a) _ ' 0 O
o
73 a (DO aN O a) a).fl 0) .� -� ,»- ` -C ' C 'a) a U
CNO C () Q F CU
O
4141 CI . a) a aO _N 1J C O i-fl HoaZo a < o = < . . D Q L aZ a)U .:(>oZ
a.
E
4. L as
,-
•c--
upLn M a)
M Q
m r- Ch ! r- C
�^ � iN o
N.--.
MCY5 CO
6. U
CYi • W
c'? ! ! I Icn
m �r i i
•v
�i I M7
• i 6 , ! a.0
I
am i i ! N
ter- i ► , a.
1 c\1 1 i I t ! s 0
III r- M I ' i I ,
1 f i
i ? W
CD
L LCDI �; N. O
--
CD ► I O r- N I M `'
xt N-
J J I J
i J J J ' J J -.! E J J
(
Z i I I LL.
� l
a)
a)
co
i o H H F- t�4i LJ i H a)
LL E E >.rics 1. E HEa4":
C O 0
75 CD 0
F- L,• H 2 co
1
c O) 0) o) •
._ o •C •c- •c a' C c
'•
O E ._ 'C 'c
03 :�ii �. N N N .11=1 2 Z76 N N
_ 0 �� N as N co of
L.
Q. C 0) C) C) V .& 0 C C
c
c .0 'C a) a — -
c 'C
CD 2
as
U a. E. a. • O C4 a. a_
• = 4
L_ N > •
C
O O N
O
CD c cal • E a)
.0 U j COI
_ a) l N U)
gl
C cu uiQ N O IlHa)'
C1{ "8 a) CB5
(Cf Q) U±,C O O O
Q. r) C) N
N 2 O O N vi _,t' O N
r
C O 4-, C C KI X Iall a M
_ _ U
CIT cN cA — a) " C C
a: E .� NL a., •. -Ci • a) .a a)
RS -0 . C� co �'` •' (�
L c L c C K.-. • Q) S as o
a) a) a)
c ca �- x a ; I,
O Q-w U •, ...,;1 • ._ O a)
C� _ ,_ 0 C c �� .1 �I ..! a C O O
c�
0 1 •+-. cn o o •' uh • C a) L co
�- C >` � o - �.. o
zez. O ..c Q) D ••G O;£ .0 0 C c O
L L C`O Ci3 i O= .� a) a) a CO
V co a) co al C >+ -E"' "a 'Q Ea) O
< L acs Em c L v ��
'U = C L co OE • as Q a c n U
cn o o
OO C C N `�'�I ' -c ♦ -0 C -0
c� > 0
- O CO c0 2 co . so I E, a - N c c cii
C
c
C .'-' Q- E U co ' I Cif C • 0+•• C O
Cu O a) c/) CO co ►, a; .' O co a) 0 0 'in
_co OL L O " ccQ. a)f , 1 cl> ..5 to sO,^ �>
O . O • a'a) `a •` L �,O O i
+-% U C w ::1— C 'a C U fn U
O U C � � C �1
U.
Q)_' C �
_c O ,a) N 4O cn O 01 ii ', NU
st
ci i _c 0
a� tO DU Com o1 • .a0 C � �� � O C
C C C O a) a) :p O 0 • C ! a) —, a).- -o t _al
p co O CD C 01 •C1• i ci ?,� z. U O C
Q.-►-, O C: + ._. W A �• LO C C
Y +' a� QQ 'S { .� C s D L Q. 2 •
0
o O U O U O a, .-M aA ='•_' I o co
O �-
1 4! (.7, ca, i
a a) C
'> LEQ > > > > a) 0 = '> � , '> i-' a)
I O x 0 cc a. a)
.0 0I O
C Q,
cvE CN-06 c
OU E N N a.
_ 0 j . I— O
m c 73 0 -' c T-r-6
0E V C. I Q C 8 a) N N
r ` • c) -co- C
a) • ' Z m CSO CO •
•,- O 1.
�` ' I a- N CD
1.600 i '�ca c6 co • •• (� - , W
CD r- CO( . Q �. C N to
'—(Ni
•
.. a.oD- � E 0 tCTrOCD
0 IZ '12 r-
ANN N
• L a.
i6 g ' :-...c rz
r-NN N
i • 0 _E '
0
CD f'`" O O i '•i L L L)
.12 '
gl N 0
C
Z <da.> Li N s Z
U)
a)
tip.. 0)
Co
0_
E E
a) It
H H
0) 0)
c c
J J
0) 0)
c c
c •C
N N
06 06
0) 0)
cc
.c �
c c
Co as
Er_ a
a)
o `�
Co
co cn
EL
CO
O "p
`C C
C
.^, CO
W a.�+
CCT ,..-
a)a)
-o 0
CO N
a)
C Cn
N C
a)
SW O 0 O
0
CO N
to (0
cn N co
a) a)
AM Oa) O
c C
CO as O
p. 0
u)
1 -0 C
co O CO C 0
13 C O .cn
co > CO 5 >
a) N
L Q
0 .0 c
so Q)N 0)
U) C a
p— 0 .0
O C a) C N C
a) C a)•- co
EE .
�r co.—C co c
C
c a) c C
co > ca a) ! co
• > = 1c
a) c a)
o
I ce -(1') cc E ' a
E
•
c
co
a-
Co
i
0
40 1
0
aU
i
LU
i
u 0
N 1
OM i Tr O
0
N
r 1 3-
3
O
1 c�/ 1 1/
i H
or
N N 0
F
1M o
' 00 1 a.
V e V f
SSP
i
1
I t
WO
CO 111
1co 43 E
L I L Q.
1 76
as i_
u 1. /--
O cm 0 =
-c
I L111
C) il' C
C
i v: C.) Zt C
s ..... a) + U � a) I OA I •- Zvi
c E C ca Ch c_o c_oCT3 °� as Ili 3 = o
.L 0 v o o> 0 o C 0) c .�
a. cn W W .� 'c L O 8 O U
E m 0 0 C C� a. y a3 _ .m
T) c 1al
c) rX Eli U CZ i� '§
CD 75
-C t I C"J
r.*
5OO^ NO O
E O C _UO aLL Cl)) C '{cy,
co
.0 O Q0 • C!cbV
C a,_c C U • :F 1.. 0 A1C c-C48 a
Cl). 8
Q, i ��•� � � _ � of E oo (On
a�
E A 42 OE � CC �� -I N
(n � Q E CD UC 11311 ' >>. 0a)� ONTz "E0�
cocnS... C p , O
OC UO Q
giQ > .n OO .O,
ONa �C00cC
N � EaCN .2)
L.- N • �_� N= > �
) U) � N CVC N = � cm•- 0
c) -6 :i:+ VO+-• a� OOC (6 ( O CCN
o 2 Q h v I- > a) U
'J -0 CUa) 00 `mu) C • OC L < pV O
O � Q -.5 LE O' O C . -o
c wa) c� -o 22 U) CO I 0 O C
v) C a) 0Q. 0 ` . C >. OUC p
.z-,-..s-6 5 O C a >, N .N.-
- = >,- O •tn
�:N (CS Oo NCS co 92 O - � po E p N
� - Q- a-(13
> • U U�
E >. U >, -a z O c C › -o a.
E N U L. 00 O L O • • C
-C _ � � N NNa) -c
+.� .-� 3 UU - Ea) i C� CO a) +'C..+ � �S
c e. clam 00 ca E cn (pc +, ' 1 L,., U � Q-o •C
a) = -c= a 6,C � p0 Eo ,D . C L QO C
E C O C CD 0 TUU) U X 4 C N O � (�
p U OcoC a3c OLp CO_� 4 a O C p � di
O 0- Cc CL co +moo Ca) C • E O U-6p C
> RE v, -ti; a) L- CO C W E co . a o (a 4-. O
oCO C oCt E2->, a)o � c - C� c � c
.20
Z °' m00. Ca) sCl a) a m `o 0 E aio �
C Z Q.
U MN C
Q
a) 6 V N ca
Z c a? < -a co
cu U C 0 �- cu •-, N(N-
W O
2 E C GD Co CO Z E U = N M 0
LL L a) V V
E Ln M E 0 r-r- OC
.�'J -
W N E 0 � J, E 44w
� N — ~OW E U - - W E o y rnj
CI cL L v0 Co d • 4OW 5
U_ ') O Q N (e' -t-')
0
a Co d. �N 0 co co
O � o - co r` Co 0 0c Nv a
Z I- C
O 0 J Co Co Co Co Co co § '•� N F-
M�
W o 0 L � 0 o � U
°' (� �. � w
N N ( co �t LU O �+ .0 r. 0
1- L E 0 0 I a p p = v p
w w w w wI }- L p a.
M Z Z U
r--
a)a)
a)
co
a_
a?
E
co
U-
0
E
"-I
co N a)
E = cn
a.m
cial
Ce
0
D
c
as
c
a)
E
0
0
a)
a)-o
a)
a) c
ca)
oU)
�
� o
N.- M
d
O as U 0
V U
Q to L 0
C 0
ui
U
m C
U O
}' O 0
n3
N
a)
a)
a) 0
a) _
00 5
C D CO
O cp
F--0 c
CD"C3 0
L C
+� to CO
o >,
4-c E
E
1
I C
I CO
i E
I13 i Co
C
C
o
! m
Q
. w
s
cn
O
a_
I `r,) s `r
o
o
Q N
a_
1 0
s 6
0
W
1 G 0
E
o_
i
4
co
a)
m 1 I
ai
a)L L m I I�
a) i O O O �
LL I i E L ; E c H 76 cc
.p = L -
m I F— t = m v
U. C �, ..Ir
.� a) O O J
<
II- { 2 2 2 V p
1 a) C O C O) 0 i C -Y
!0 .y U Q ICD C N C V `) t 75 p ` OL
a. I W0 c 06 ca c t E coy
o
}
c its c U- 0.
U)
re �Q/❑ a) 0 C 0 N =
E
O
L
a
u) .��-� a-%
� I cn
- U
..c.0 C O U•C C 0)U �' +-%
r-'.2 _C (T3 Ll O _ C
doX ..0 Ea) 0 0 co -0 = Ca)
cncc O 0pV EQ. >O cts a) a)
ooc OC � E � Q CC E
E �W
+� �� � a) O U2 CR3 > C
0CD co
-.+-3 c Co >C s > to
L. O
. 0 O CD C13 co
L pQ zl
Fs
-0 O.0 a) f v) O c C
cocn-a _c .ULo .amu? >, �•' O Co �
>' L co. 0 „�- O O ( a) 0 CO
c.0 }' C_-0 U) c Uo _CL oC
c � .0�•- CD � L }, N Hca
a)N•a) o O a c)c 4— (13 E Co< � U E 5 C In
0
L
+_� L � v tea` oo- �.c al 17:
N 0� o
O a) -a_— c -0 cv H
N I a)— > .. - co
0 O�O • inLC O� •� c� �C ID O CL O
< �'U� U CD CI)
OC CO CO C V OC 2
O O 0 u)+r -�.+ N a)s Co C E �` Q N co (a U
cCS co
c c/) a) C CLi �.- ,O
• Co C a) co (U O O v) N c
a
o E _ a) c
as n � �� Q- o.c CU a) c � i c c a) .c
a) a� o 0->,•-" CD-0 °) o �' oC▪ � >
Coc -0 (13uo� a� CO R� € a) a) co
co c N cn c E Ls 0� .� U
> � o ca � C � Na) E0 1 -0-4) _� L - C u) 0_
`� a) a3 C > >,N O
U }' c � .- C o 0o ('� � 0 C a) C L �s
O0 p � E' Q .SOC 2.0 N Z O O cv �Q
(LScm,_ O a) u) OE- a) 00 .- I) C Co• a) C6
Q
+-.+.. � � X � OOH OWN C.0 �� QO
E c -0 >,._ >,a) =-0 U " L -fl, C Q C ?'Co a) +-,
Q) OfC� + U 4-,Z3,, ca) al O (13 u3 al N I E
U (6 C•o C - +� L$ aro U -o Z C C =N O C
coop' �� ) aa) o� co aco o— a O Oa) c0' a a)
— OF- Co _ Q. — c.� U, o ❑ fA UUcn 2 Qc E a)
< L� E
IX Uch c
0 c) c a) as
1
�,
Z _ CN-
0)
C Q E N a L 0
ce Qo Ni c
cu M • U
Z >. I() i N
•....aMIMI
E 2 N M r?
Ni Z .L- �i a.
. 0. v -
-- CO-
•c---
0) co (� C
_ ,� cn O �. N lC) r
• O
< P cs a Lf) If) eN
O
N N I.() (0 co co -J _ -0 -
V— C ix)
V' �. 0 > 5 �.C) Lf) FF-
L
U
N M O N-CD
V L W
.0 ❑ d d d ❑ d a) O .� n! 0
E--- U E F-- �--
= 0 0 0 0 0
0 Z U U
ZZ
0)
a)
0)
(a
a_
a
E p) o) o) 0) C s_ - - - (B 0) 0)
ct; C C � L � � � C C C
L
LL. o O O F- c) 0) .co_ 0) o) cm
cm C 0) C C C C C C C
CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
E i-
-i -, .. L L ,.. L o
0 O O 0 L
UU U
U •U U U U U U U U - -
to DD CO a. a. CL 0- CI. 0_ Q_ 0.. 0-
Ce
u)
O 0 C -= C U lb-
V)
CD U 2 n C' U U
U) 4- V p Q) 0 O C .-
C
.Qas ate) N C E L Q.� a)
U
as U L O C C (13 U)
,.0 Q) 0 0 CO Cl) Q 0
a) O C O a) D O p c
L co p L a) O
a) ,O p C p (6 C CLS U a)
U) V) L as p O L- - Q) O Q
U +� O Q, as C E CN O .� C6 O O
a) as Z-) a) p = a) p > > o_c
CLS o -a.". C Q al- L- >O U p:� a) o
oE -c . U) x o Ca C n) o- -a c6 U) •-'o
L L a) 4-' a)> C co as> C6 O C •E 0
Q E ..0 CZ E > -ac ° � U) .5<-'5 in
Q .- D O a) E U a) U)•_ ccs cn N
o c -o Ca CO }, O .� > U a) a)c - CO co
Cl) a) a) a) N L F- c6 CD a) UU) U o
p E L c ca - a) o. o--_ ca �, o cn co
al � >, o
:� n v -off tea)(0
c L C -o
Q >• C ED_ 4- U C C O E p.— -O U•> o-O o
U a) Q a) u) a)D as •U a) a) ..� D C >, 0 as
Z3 o U O C C C C >5 Cts L ,-• a) U -p o U)
>, c Cca p a o.- -tEa) UCc cB c
(� O C U - o u) ;+_� C -o-C O-p L p•Q) p.+.._. p
U a) as L O
Q) E co Q m (QU ? 4- co> um CD c DUB �U .>
p LT p ���RR �_E p o p a) 2- rm a) u) co O Ca a3
E -§
O ,3)
- C > U U-o 1-- C a) - - U
as
Qas
o U a) tea) — a) > (l o_ N
O U C1:5 �. L_ 0 : O 2 pcp� L u° D 0
a) c/) 0 a)0 a) as C--, CO N O o' 0'(D c.u)
a) 0 0 C _ . u) a) L O ._ C (0..c a) >
U) w N C6 co a) E C N +-• U) a) C�
o 73 L 4-- a) Ca14- C O C
0P CD a) _ca O > O p 4- CT C Q a) c a) (6
' C �4- �� _c U (f)_c_ 07 E -c 2 �, ts c 1 >+- � O N E.
�"C N -�; +-� Q O 4,•, - o Q 0 U) a) 0) CCS•C C O.- CO
>,al � C CO c C 0 C D C E _
C (0 c ca
Cm L a) o-c C .as
L. c a) .c a) a) S••>- 0 o n-o Q. C ,, E,.,,,. 4:as
5
TT,
e > �}' � -) `�- � C� ca�� � L, C - C
o) -a3- QU Q. Q a a) o-p poO > .E aC E�� �> L a)
E
C.?N a.
CC)co,--73
a-
a-•+ (ON CC) Ll
Q) CC)a3 00 C
E N-Cf)CO co cii 9
a) r-'C3)in CC) U
a)
Z. Cr)CC)Op co d' W
4 r- O co-N (1) CC) �- +-,
(l) CO d' ,-C3)CC) 0) 0) .- p
cu CC) C1•) CC)CC)00 t Cf) in - a.
= N I` a) CC)N d N N CO O
O 6) O)N C) (C) i O
Q. CC) CC) Cf) in Cf)CO - CC) Cf) Cf) - a_
r- C'7 'Cr- N N I Op O N CO- CO N N CO 0
r- = (0 C3)N (fl - r- N C'p O tet' 4 4
in Ct) CC) ,in 00 Cf) in Cf) CC) ,- CC) CC) CC) H
0
w
L T-CO '1 CC) C9 N- CO O O ,- ,- 0
Z LL'
0
O
CD
as
O) p) E
C) L O E O L L Q.
i at C C C O H O HC O' C� O CU
_ F- F--
O C C c oC c m D
•E O O O .0 o 0 0 a
~ JCD
> to
O O N 0 a)— 7- a) U -- (U c
•- U U U U U U U U u) O O to C
c c •L ...Y
L-- -0 ort o N
D
E• = U) U) U) U) (a)U 0 � > > 2 S' 05
•i O -_ i= �= {= C C *.' _U (6 _U cu _U 0)
a- co c c c c c _� 1�
G1 cts Fo �- cLS _ ca D L = c
C F-- F- E--- F- F- H a Cl- � cLs
0_
cu) O Q) L
O U _c _ O
O -a c �' C
C C� ;� O 5 - Q) o
O C U) o D C Ca
CI
c E -c °y o
-o '- 2 t c5 U Ca O >. CO
O {• Zi)= 0 C >, -`-1 :+= CLS
o Q .,., o L o
CO L C Q) o •co L •C> -C•
C 0 E Q •U IDO)o C
C COCD O U *= CLS C c 0 Cl)
C U > C a) to 4- CO co _. .
o CCO L 0 }, _D O .17) cn
O O Q O C 9- 0 0 U O -O O
CO Q _E }' :77 _~ C 4 C a) C .0
U L CO co
C U -. CO 0 CO CO -..F, _C cA C i
1 O C 4 �S }' � O CLS -
O - a 0L _ 'L
-p Q CO (j 0 0 to a-• -�• V
}• N C U 0 - a) to
CCI - U ^ C Ct CO C/a O 'N O O
_ >+ +� �-•- ,, U o'C Cts L Q U co a3M
• c .0 a.) ,_(.0 C O O Ce2 o� E c)
U `-� aUc) ouE a� la o o
Q E ca CD CO 0 Q Q C L C
c � p co `� �'� coo o O
Q .> C E _ O.- COO C
ca 0 ( L a a) O - co O
C O C , CO � cn >, U,
.� >
co -`-� .... c3 •C O-a L CO
C Q) + to C >, U •.0 C 0 C3) CD
O Z3 (� L C O 0 p C L
O 0 Q O, •o >% p C'LL (�(� C � O N
C < 0 0 n-
Q W O _U — f6 co
> a) s C U To -O O C-c- c6
O co O L CO -+--. Qj (o Q
a).— O +,
cn N CCS CtS C O O a)'c c O N O U O O C > co
C C D C _C C Co a)O C -O 0 a -c �� L,\\\ a
CO O - Q O .�, .0 u) > C��`
L �' Q) o U) _ct a"-' (I)
O O 00 ' .\ C
0
• C (ll (� O U i5_
Q \��,� CCS
Q `+- ++ COO ���,,, +�
C C)to -Y U O CLS` c Q ::• U CU p ••,, C
Q O C a) CO -�• p- U CLS p C U O U O
C L C Q o L 2 OO O C �`.� E
U CO < — . 5 ._c Q. O .J F— Q U:�.co U 0 w \,. O
Q
Co- E
cfl c
Lri co
= N CO CO
a) 6 r- O
E
4) ,- co .-- N O
O O U
CO O
— co- r-- co coW
LU (C)
N.: Ln U)� n U Loci
•-c.) a
N-N ,-
N N V• CO V- (C)
o LO L 5 N. Co O N- L6 N 0
0. Ln Ln Lf) Ln Lf) Lfj O
N
L6 ti fit' O L6 L6 O O) C))
Lf) Ln 6 6 L() U) Lf) 6 Ln 6 F—
i- U L
a) LU
CO N- CO 0) 0 r- N CO
N N N N N N CON 0
E F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- ~ CC
Z U U U U 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 CL
Z
ii
IMP
[ N--
a)
0)
(6
Eo) a_
Via' E 0) �.o
o0)
a) c_ o c H c
a)
i HE 0) - E- p p O O
C
U H O O O
3) O)
QJ DOO
CCOC D 0 p3 C C
c 0 O O . O O O O
4
co
a) 0) 0)E •> U C
V C .U O Z'3
°' ?'.S2 o N c N a) ca a) m
co Z3 O Q 0 •C 0 0 O
E
s CC _ °� 0 O o CO 0 O V= (a
O Q ,a3 CO U O C C n_ .O (a u)
c > J _C
co
o 0 L_ n_ n_ ca H 0 ca �-
U
O
+.., a) c
5, ui -5 0) C6
a)
Ca a) a) a) o O0 >,, 0
E .0 0 U) 0 cco
..� 0 OO O III
• O ._ ,.a�„`' 4_ (6 C
A`v O O C •U 4 U) C O cn co co as p
P ›...
73
Q (CS 0 O `� C E 0 co
C O � Q CUU � c as n- =
E.
O +-' NUQ U} + ga)
.-�_� .� -� a) EC6Si � -+= C
'E U5 a) +� Q C 0 U -� • Q
-0 U (6 _O (CSO C a) C a) 0)
",� E a. > L cn C .c O
p a).,.�- - C a O C 2
N � • � \�': Q DDS NNO” Q c Du) -c
C cn a) �±- -D Q a) L' 0 a) ▪ CCS N (a E i)
ttiUzcCO
U -zO o Oa L co
a � co U C >' c a .s3 .O c •-- U 03
co5 O 'u) 0 a)LI Q a 0 _ n = o su)
a) O
v— +.VU - 0 O n U > 6 U
-U � Q N Q a)� BOOa� Oc
sC z3 CO a) a) -o}, ,
S. L-17--
cn
w U' C as QLpOQaO
O N Q U) Q 5 m 0 DO •�N
73
Z L N C C O U (a 0. a_
O p O 's a) O p U a CCS C L U
C E- O ow C 0 U >'- U) •—-O C ._' O- -C
Vrzs C
>, c ~ O (CS 0 U U) CO 0 Q) -J s_ N C u
cn U O o > U) Cn 0) C o E a) o)U) C
IF Q v C U O Q. 'O � C+_� U U +� Oto O co
a) O N u) .- E.� _- o_a) E -
> O �' c a)C U) co ,}- - O .Q O H n-
a)
cn N N O U O - a) O a) C U _c O 0 a) C
C a) '- 4) CCS .0 O
W vi a) co ,4_, O•C a) _c O co(CS 0_2a)s c -«
V♦
lio CI � � > O 000> c Oo-C E > x (D> a) Oo x E
a� LU 0 QUO — --� 0 (a < a) W 0 4- 0 W a)
Z — E
Q -SD cu
111. CO 0ti
W a) (13
°' a_
N
_ -4 o
W• C a) 0 ( c
a)
o
- E E N N a)
W E lf) d t` M +�
I-- Rs o_ C\j N O M o
O
U •- N M N O
Q E O d- N N O � O
c
Ll
U OA L CO- V• I O r- r- N CO 'r 0
JC r- N N N.-- co d 4 4V3
CO 3 (.6 (6 (0 (0 (9 (0 ( 6 6 6 (6 f--
o U L w
11. O a) 0
a) 3 (N CO
CD I� CO (3) - '-
H- 0 = v6 U5 U5 u) U) (6 cn cn cn U) v) n'
3 t.t_. L.L. u_ u_ u_ u... u_ u_ u_ u_ u_
t�
Z a_ a. a_ a_ a_ a_ a_ a_ a_ a_ a_ 11
N
a)
a) E 0)
EL E E E E a) (,)
i f— H o a) H E C aao
C
co o
ell
� 0) ^ 0) 0) 0)
= _ — — �, >. 4. _C C
4 -6C =
CC •— o N �,_ >, N c o L'.� N N
E O 0 0 0) a) _m U � � _O U � ._ °o oZS
•z- O a. c U cO() C C C a) c p c0)
0. C O _ � •- o > 71 L C
CL
c
-c U
c‘3
o
0) L
a) . o o
CL u., -c c
O�- � �' o0 a 0_
w �• s-- ca C H E cn
0
FO L O o a)CO3 a o
U sZ o a) c a�
o`'' aa) 0 o (/, 'o' o
0• a) c o �� U O
o o c p
o c -C p -� .o•• E c�cm
a g c6
C > co > -- = E •a) U c
c
E > � oa oo Uc o o
a) cn C o cn c to
c a) 0)— ca E — a) a) 0 0
0 _c a) .> a) -° c CD
N
cn -5
� � � � oc n- o E a) C o N
c a) CZ a) -1 c O 4- a a) p 2 r�
v -0 g3 — �C v c a) .� u� o
� U o � c
< D U N -� {Z u) Q. a) C -- O,— o c U
a) < c� O
00 � � amu, �O > g _ +.7 O
c/)9— Ca) a) oa .c Q) C U
c C � o _�co �
Fn-
o �� .cco Eo .�.c o � -� � � c
c o n3 zs.� L v, O
� � c � � �o co o � � o'c
Q) L a) c c c a ->
> Qo0c o-� ca co-o o ezi S2 .� 0o a)
moo o To F a) c n 1 om EQ N
U U u) >+ ,477 Q) (�
a) a) c a) > Ua.
a) ,� • U O c� N
c �= cn c� a) �, c ° � o 0) a) co
U o a) o) c_ L u) O as '''jj O.0 0
• (13 O O Ni cz v"', O
(6 D § •C C E Q_C `` a) q} Q. -O 4.7 C
C 0 a) 0)< -- •c -a C C a) cn co
0 >, N cn c C 4-. t c cn vo
Q � cn C +� Oal C
C c U) Q°,, a) C co >, o a) a) o 0 C
co
p.L a) +-� Q) �'' cA O CtS
> O N L- •
C Z3 a) cn E coj — n +•
O L L a) .0 c.L 15 •
Q 0 0 C cCO a) o Co a>)•> a) -Cn
c� ac
)
_ Ca) .wa
I N Cl- Q ,_ W 0) 0_ a = c W e N
W Q.
moc F
co-
s
• v� +- C
: a co
o
'a Z ,, .a E.
a)
_ +- c
a) 6� a)
E ��
CO 4_,
E C
a> ,r- E c a) O
Z
6� O0
u `nN Q L v ,� O
= co ro —
O
� E v 6
CD
N.- N.: N
aj 6 6 6 CO r-- D 0,0 N F-
L
cu
> L w
CC
Z a.
LL LL LL LL LLLcL) Z _ _
cL 0_ a. w H- rti Z
LL
CO
,---
a)a)
0)
-o I as
a_
O L O Q) E N ca i-
al I-- 45c E a ) c f- O
cn o L
0) c c aU 0 o c -
O coE
c co Uoo O Ea)
Q) J a)u) U E- 2
H
)N C C .g 4,
.— C C N .- O a) a) O O c
O N N L 12
m
eu
Tl� 06
oo
ca) O c
CCD as CO (� 0 N a_ a_ a_ Q F--
CL a. a_ a_ 4
c
a)
>� �- E a) C -
(� c
co c a) O m C Q
^ L -CI
(0 pU) Q_ O 0 O O >+
F- V) -a D
0
o
U Q
....., a) n E O - O
c - 0Q_p0 O ) U O (Z
CD i (a to
U)".
o a).O CU C N U)
a) Q.L— N •U _ 0 (6
poEx L •Z.5 Q)
O 0- Cil -�
sCD �4 C A 0 C 0 Q_ .+__ a) 'c
� •
\ iO C C v) _C C 0 a) (0 C
�„ C0)� C �, � Q_ O
O (2 15•� OU) CE-- CO (13
L_ p COU) D in
0-U O O
O Q =-CPQ >. a)}' C L- O
o ÷E' -6 � CC p t�� O co O
C C = � _oo�� _ p � Q) Q.
O O U C �� -0 :� U) CZT Q. > (° O
C[5
) pU �> C .- OOv
V u)2 CU U CC QQ-U
U O ��'� � CD 0_ nQ O O
C o _C �.,_,•> 0 O 0 co E 0co - U U)
a) 0 , -, COOQ- N C � UO C _0 N
� Q -OBS ca >,Q� � �' � Q- � � o E U
> (a �.-_ Oc •- o .2 a)
O� �� cc� � . N � c:, L
i Q> o u) 3'0a) �, v � o
oO C .0 oDE- Q } -•� co.� Uu) 0 -c
ci_MP NN 0*-E a' �� • O - Q) o Q a) E co
C
c -O •„,, a_
o
lra
a) - c C i L i ...
� � L C A L a a)
a) p t6 o) a) D=7 ' U n 0-0 Cr a) C (a O C E
E � Q) OU � a) s- C U.0 C C N
Q U U C <U.E �.Z Z Q, a. c� <�-. 4-- Q.
Q -2 4O E
N r - cc)0 C
i O N M (6
Q 7 06 CL
.a d. Q, r r
r Z N Q) r r• 14) N C6
Ccp — 4-, a) 0 CO CO
C .r C
r - co-
-4.
O
Q r
Cr) d' U
N �.
Z. � Ce a.'Q Q N CO CO O N
•-- _ _ r W
U c N r N r' V
y cNj W C N r- cri
r O
a) cd 00 r a.
0 N 0 E a r N N r O
o N Z .L 0 r N co O
Q. Q `�” a' r O 00 CO CO N
O _r _ a.
(0 N r- (n E U cu r r Ln CN--
. M o
r r N r r r r r i
N: N f` c/ ora coi co r co O) CO CO �-
_L. 0
C) O C) 0
CO12 'V 1.0
O C E — N co ,r-
E. == I a.)i - m Etc
Z CO Fesrzl
-
Z a_ a. a_ a_
NI-
,--
a)
E E L L L L L
L �-. 0 0 a)
1- o F- H F- I F- F-
o E E
a) 0 a) '0 E E c -C 2
.- c Q a) a) a) a)
0
c) c) 0)
c c
U U C • •
�+- cc- N0 0 CC 0 0N CC 0 N aUi o aoi
' 06
O cl co co c 0) U) 0) 0)
a. Q _ - c
co C co ca cu C (6 C C co
a. Ca_ CL i
L
O Q? a) >Q) L
L
C .
al o C O Q) to
o L
EL
U Z3 • "�\\�' V O co
a) 4-•U
.Q �\\\� O L O o
-O C .:, Q. • 4-
Ca Q,\r C6 a) — C L ''' N
Q)
ui-13 0 � > 00 cD QCD (� �
a) .''',',,,..W 0) -C w 0 all
3Q. ( a. >c Cno aa)i � C
O ,_, c U a) o
o 0 a 0E Ca) c6 u)->
QO -Ou) c 0 � o -C}' -U O-O
Q
o �; •� O U�
a)
a) .O a) Cha) Q. N
a) Cl) -e a) a) a) UO L In
E to cu 0 Cal t— _� CD
Cl) E) N Q. 73'Q Uas° C Q. N
c -5 a) -O C a) c O 4_ Q)
+j ';- Q, - (1) E o c c ca 0 o (0
O Q. O O L
0-0 LL (CS o C C U
a) a) --Y N L o 4- a) a) o
Oc 0 U Date) U -- QN
a) - U C Q) 0 O L o O
• 0 C i i. 4-1 L Q. L' > •lA
o
>4_ C ;+_. '00':C C-0 -0
C C C6 0 Q) a) U •+-_ '�:,_.' N
C6 0 Cl) —j 4-' _ a) w -C L .— N
J o 42
a) a) -0 ( 1.,_. a) 0 a) as -C
ID
CO U c
o � -0 _c co0 �c , 8 N a) N-0 ca
0 4-J _c co o cla � 0 C 0 0 1-. 0 0
co 01 c - .c as .5-c a) 0Q. � 0 c
0'C c cci c6 c6 _•'C Q,0) cc[S Q -C� N O
Q O Q) c0 a) t5_ o a) o L a) Q_ U >,- cz
O 0 c 0 c 4- Lu) � 0 (n _ 4=• 0 c
C __ C C C o Q.D a) a) ct'S O O-C
— — — C6 ._ LL Ca cn 0 CY..L.. CJ) cn a)
Q
C
CZ
mr-
73 Cl.
a) Lri
= Lc i
E
a) r- C
O
O.,
E cd U
a)
—' N N W
ch 4 N j
•� 00 co o
M MN N O
00 00 00 O oci 6 o0 N
CV l
C'7 orj - LO (.6c- 4 Imo- I,- �
00 06 op.‘- op Op op pp 6 op C/)
L U
.Q
O 0
LL
E kr)
a)
07
i
E 2 ct LLLIC 1
0) •
L � C � C �� 4) � O �ta O C'ED O-IEj o ,,.., a) +.� a) •
N c c N
15 11
o o o o o co
o o 0 •
U 0 Ea) E ° Ear Ea) E ° Ear c Ea) E (1c
_c ° 0a) 3U ° U ° U ° Uo 2 Uo 0( C
C 0 p 0 p 0 0 p p O
0
C
E -o
^` C
W co
> o C C C C a)
O C 2
0 0 cuO Q]
pTo
�X RS
o
2 a) U C O >,cna) -�.0 E •
•
O 1O -t O , a) s_) 2 CO a) pI
° co
Qcm
a)
,, ? - N C j•.U 0) O
L
LO Oo I
ooQ a� c 0o c
0 c o
coci, N N C F°— N a) •—
C < 0. a) O U C U L
E •
N .2 UC Ea) CO ED_ 0 c
0 ° C C _ a) a) Q O U) - a) • In
Q E c E (6 -t� 0--'' N - 2 +�.� = CD
.-P >. -c E O o 0 E N N O N ' O
co
z CO) c N-0 a) j � +� Q ca �,U -C O
OW p =O a) ccnc0n ) O oc, co) E O E2 co- O0 • 0
.� .r Nto a) , -0N Up C
v a} Q �-' N C O = V O) fi (Cf c ' U
Q .-: a) m U 0 C O O •
r ez
cn .2 � �� ,a) ow NO75—
cn to
� >, > to C .�.. C.- 4) • C
O NC al ,_a) (6 (6 +. N U O
+� • O V 3 Q C C cn U a).C1) = C u)
C a) a) 00 Q •w i 00 N -6 O 1 • . '>
00 O coL 'i- 0! N� � p � N0 , L
O E V 0 c�- U
as -c) c. .NNw Hca o ♦=_ �ai•- c tU -c E N
Ilk _ (0^ cC -0 CO N 0 �U j c 0U E Q.
^' _ a) .c
L W U C•Q- (�zco Q ^`.0 W +J
. � Lo D a)ea C •CC Q. CQ '>V fl Iii
> co C
co
C - v� "0 (1)(13 ai CU ° +=' O Q • 0cn Q.
O (�- Q� > O V 0+� ° • _o CTDo Q 04 C
•
w a) > •- 4) C -0 Q).� a) a) U 0 c6 Q
a_ , - j 2 43 vas , � 0.II Ea) 3• L cL EE _C > `f� c0 I �•E CCO ) > >.. a)
c CD-t CDa) 00 c a)> a) oc o� OO)o a).� E
Y< QC 0 0"C � 0a) Uo i L.L. 00 C)i5 • . (1)
i
i (13
Z Q � n..
V C c 0
IP Q � c E
W .s m o
I
ow o
a-CC M
a)
CD
i=— •- - jro
r —J >. c CA
L m I! csi O
o a.
me v E "cr. i ,—
io o
Z a. a; CN
o
Z N
o; ( 0) o)
11 Q E N co- i j co-. of r` (0 O
V I c- C
C N1 1 i I w
Q m 1 i o
c E U U 0 1 0 0 i Q Q Q i Q a.• ti
CO
I a)
2 gE i E C m E E ra_ca
C = 0) Q) a) >2 L L
OE
s 0 c 2 ! •2 C a) o C
y — —
a) a) U co a) ami u)
� 2 H 2 2
C
. ! o C) co a
•"' O 0
U C
yCC a. Lco r(i)
NCD
N
o p Eo Eo Eo co E _ o�
CIL E o > o > C .L
o UW U� UD - a CA C C ca C
re o ca CO a- CU
v.
E
.•U 2
cn '7.3 a) 75
>-C = O
Ei c) ca) � C '5
a O a) L N m O
C 5- N t
CD U >, O O '— to C
1-.5
+ E Q O.0 C
3 2 0 U C a a0 0
CO
SJR a t) °L i.+
a o u' to �'.C cn U
.�.+ U C U O CO
cD
o a O - w
o � — a c o � � L.� ca
o v—
L) co-
co
!) I a) C CO tD - O }'N N
� � = N i N E o - u E o? C}'' > O c*)
ccs 0 UO > c U ' QO to ca N N a p O
CI) CL co
2.
-
NQ Oa , O 73V a C a) Q aoU - a a ' aC -05 a) o)O C_c +> U.-Q o U _ r
Cl) 5 c
•
c) >. ca ca C � OO
3 .-. Cn J '_ � � QC6 � N O
Z r, -5
a)1E a) � � �+r c �
C C C a)
Q E � OCL QO a) N
a) +.• a_13 a)
i L U C CON W 3 C U C a) C
U � o U
0 C) U (l) to ca a)+-' O
a o > O v 7 > co a.- me N
v Cd a) a Z O � o > O to a
CO D N U d) a) O 0 i RS a_ ' Q> +' O
U aa E
C 1... vs
O N
V .4- o) 12-
o V c
.J �? '`- O) N Cto
_ Eo) •E a ° -2 to o 0 0 a_
cd 0.ca cn� a
Q = �c C C W m e � °' I COcuCO2 o2 0
Cl) aci ,� C3 Z a� '0 cn 0_.-.-z i �-' CO`
c E
C v OC a) c(e, jEc CO C
a) C a) a) a O Ca C a
-� � C..c � .c Q v O I
c a a)
U o I —�' �!— CC.5 O. Q ca o
F
a.
Q s v s Ce
COL L.r� ( 1 J i to
� Q � a1 = ,� C-
J
Z aC ` c ,v coI CD
.'
ai i N
'CD
c
C i j 0
ZJ �n 3 r" , c- ++
...� 7 ( Q. ,t: o ' . _CN ' U
N M v CV •
S
0 a •_ O o E: e C r- W
� r- r t a >- c^ I t r r )
_ V
t o
U-I
ma E
au—C ✓ N I r r UC= OOO
7 T... N -
OQ -Q QC � a.
T--T--- o a. a � � CN, N_ CCN_ ^ r -ti COM CO(O
CN r �
eL
C " r t,() r '— I t!')
I = L 0 0 o Z N Ca
t0 re c> �-- - t LU -C j CON-- E co to
0 L
o U AE >- .0 N co Nr ' 0
x
l 1, i , , ,Q
s Z 1
t
N-
•c-
a)
0)
as
E ^L` L Cr) ^` ^` ^^``
W a) W a) a) a) W
a) .2- C .2
0 Z3
a) u) a)
P 2 2 2 2 2 2
00) o) a)
•� •
C C C C C C C U
= C 'C •C C C
._ c o N a)
.LZ N N N N N N N
ai 'N 06 06 06 06 06 06 06 06 06
E = a) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) w
• Q c c c c c -
LL Q, •c .E .2 2 2 .0 c c as
C C C c c C CC o a.
4) as CZ c6 CCs C CZ
CL a. a_ a. a_ Q a_ CL a_
0
oc-0 C I C6
O_ C C6 C O -0 U a)
Cts '0 O a) Cts-- c n
0-0 w- co C -0
CQ" � O '0a) 00o 0 a) a_
OC
-p Zl Q) To a) C as a 0 0 u)
N i �_ Q Q s-- cn Ca
cn CCS a) c ai a) L O p,-p u) o O
CZ L- c - C
Uo Ll .� L oo � � U 0 oo CL 0)a)
0
a) c +� o- L C (ICS O U C c L n
L 1— ca a) = L_ }'•E as cCS.� o
,; L acus c ) 0 a) 0- L cu)
�� =a a) �� — ctsN CZ � oN
Z',.._
o 0 � 0) 0)0) ca.L �) c 0 U-p
u) •C 0 C
u) a) a) cts .2 .) 0 o cn ca
0 p > D C Q) -§-0 a) C
Cr as Co in
a) 0 O cn C a) Q� 0 U 0 CCS cu O
o c - - CCs a) C �,
0 � � O CC 0 � �.� � 0 a) � N
U) �� 125
� � � Qo � Q) � � OIL CH
-� v U ,� o oCD
9I -C � E off, o >a5 > 0 > E cow .>� O
V cts Q) Q c Cl) 0 0 0-o N 0 L_ C- 0
Q a)•o 0 CZ L-' . • >, o CO a)-0 0
E �-- 0 a) c > L_ - _a) Q•-§ -a
ai - O CCS � . N O Cp!)r ,, u)-+-% O _ to
00 -a �Q. Via) -o Q pci)` Ca' 0U))C CZ � op C�tS-p 0'� �o 2E �� •to
O.0 C "- 0 0 Q. cn c u) > _1 a) E D 0) _o a)
N Ca 0 •-� `Z3 Q) a) a) 0 (/) Q CCB a) L
L , gC � p 0O UZ3Z3 wv) : oC 0
Q-a Q =� � o co c �� � `n � �� C �
>;U) I- a)
s 73
CO 0 . }' CD•- Cl)as c D0vi -0'x0 .._ fl.. 0-02 � 0
O as -a C U >U O� o�c NNS -§ F- � C ) C c
Us�.c a) CZ NO cn _ a) O � .mac Ca 0o +, o
co00 _c0- N > O . c6 E -§ E gcnc o'E o2o 0 c
L (13
^
E >u .cc pyo -000 Z CO (/) SCO f0 C Lc
a. a) x o c 0 —••—C c +�.L- c a) -0 Q L_-cn•
5 --- D `�'•:`�� C
-a C o —
L •\ co
�_, 0C ��� _-„co a) C a) a> Q cad �' �E \�.�
co 0-j5 -o— a) CEO > c a c� a) O •• ,�� E"
cn •v a) c c�-0 c v a) a) a) o v N o L_ U C \ �� 0
,[ s- V) CCS L_ co 4.+ U L �.
O a) C L C a) a) v1 L_ •> >73 .> Q C 15 Q)`�C O CL CCS 0
-5 ...� as Q a)
O O _ O CC5 N Ll s. Q 0
--(2-c a_U QOo > a SEE ct._ a) Q. C.)u Qcu) �"CE--- ?\� - a)
co C
N 6 co
M Lcir.: a_
C0 T r
o N- T.. - C6
V-- CC) - N- L
CLt') `-
a) cv- 1.1) --E-
E
nCE Co r O
r r r
a) inr r' - }'
N.-- M N N
�. r LU �j nj al
N r O +�
r
N.- Co �- ,- r !n
r -O o
N r- N _ N�- nI r Lfi Ln r r O r-
r
Q ,-- r r r
a. co co- C� L i _ ,- _
in 00 r r r t-
r'
_ in c
N.,.- N N N N
Lf? C9 !- C� C� r r r
0 ui
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
z
9
03
T--
a)
0)
co
i c 0 Fc 0) P. Q E Q) O) 0)
a) F- C C
u. 0 Lce -o ••o
4) C 0) CD t D 0) a)
W .--6 C C
• o 2 £ 0 0
�"' U 1-
0) a) a) a) 0)
.�..+ C C C C >- C
�, C E E •E 1- u) •-
._ 0 0 o 0 }, 7jx o
CZ .(j) N N N m 0 N 0 0
_ 0606 06 06 C Q V}
.r: Q co) 0) a) 0) U - 0 0 0) 0_ 0
a. C C
C _
cu
a C C C C to
Ce a3 CO CCS CC345 W ca 0_ a
E.
4
C
a)
To
o E -o
cc c C CU
co 'c.c.)E o.ccf
C C a) C N ( --c-i_ >4E5 a) s 0
L _ E E E a)O
(B OmOQ'C 0 ._ Q .a) a
> U C 2 C Q)
� C a__c Ca cn a) 0 .-_ 5
cCs (L) 2 (13-.J Q. a 0) v, E � a
4_ _C CO CO u)
�• o oon ai � 0 0 cn u)
�+=' p �� � C 2 > 0)
-,4--P Ca C o c -a .—4%.
to C_4, C CO— CD L 0 C) 0 c!)
cuua ( cn 0 Op E 6 +max
co 2 J Q Ca C}, CCS 0- a) a)
�� � Co._ O (1)..c LoO
al C -C O
cv
C C t C U � i- C w E Cl) Q)
C Co co
2 > poD � � � C =O U cu O
. � C
C p- O .0 0N 0 C C O O. OV a) Lt-5 - p
RS a)To L- 0 6 Cf) 0< 0OQC N < mt- U
L
Q C CCS co 0 D a) C cn u) a) L D
CtS ��-o0C �o E o c E � o ui
� _ 0 co 0 cn o. 0- N cn ,. C
cts (DI—' D C a)÷u5 Q -6 a) co _
-c -aQ) a) cn O Via) o a� E Na) C � p •to
O C-C > cn .0 > a)E sr.., 0) — cCS >
�-. C u_) .L- U) 0 0•— L. al
CCs 0 N Q u,._ t!) Cll O C'Z3 C u) ? a) p N
a)CO U ai C0 0 ,i9) •. C-c �,;� E ••�� co U n_
o rvOU.�0 o.� O >,- ca Q _c
0 � � po �n o ,o o U - -� c - � _.
o)ca: c > — E a) 4.- o p,. E C
� ooco � cao a) � � � - CO
_- -0, _cO
CD o cn C o
� � [V�� a) O �. COO a) w a _2 (Dm
c (•2a) O
� O+• O, 4OQ � ( C O P � E o � 0
V) (n a) u, += a a) C C a) _.N C
cccOOOCCSp � O ® g p N mc C2... OCa) a)
E
0oU)0 CL 73coU o Qo Uo-c
a)
o 0_
Z ms
C
cu N CCS
3-
Q ---C ) c N 0
a) E C
O
3- Lf) `- LU W U
E U
r- r- .
CA p >-- C co N j
•v N p 22 .a) N ^o
■_ r-- „- l.i.
O r- r"' r- W 0 c O I
r-- N
N OCO Cfl N- 3-
II Lo (Ni U N r- �- �-
V- =A-- l- W r- CV N N
coC
CD Nr LO Cfl = O •a; C3 r- N M -)
E w U; u-; u) ° S E f 0
Z 0 0 0 o cv .o a_
►— „,„, Z LL
C3)
r-
a)
0)
co
CL
E
L
WL
0) 0 L
Q 0 .o 1--- H F—
it
U.. C5) O) CD
W C CO _C
E p o p 0 _1 U)
L
›- C O
LMCZ ^L' ^L` nL, 0) ^L` a)
— O 0 0 0 0
C Ca
W Ca
C4 —C1-
a)
C
CC Q a)
O ce
• 0U I (6
L CV a)
L
(a 0 >, C —
0)-� U CL5 a'
C CZ U) •a• C
C Q -0 0 _Cco
co cm 0
_ 0 Q ca
L
>� V- Q. -1--+ U)
00 C C _0 > C _Cc co a) O C (� O a-�
0 U)
HUh CZ
(1)_a 0 O co 0
U >, L
0 a) >,-
, Q ca 0)74 �i U) L 0
to U) CZ -C▪ & \�\
NL 0 0 C
o C -- E0
cn
D >, O Q C U)-0,',.. . eft'` >n''
L- +� +� +' \ i
O U) F- C lf) i
CL.0 ca '+ 0 a) c6 U) \•, 0
O U) O 0 a) a) \�\ N,
n- C 0 L \� w\\�� 0..
Hi
C cm �6 \ \'+- W ,,,..-\''.74',,\:.\\171::::\\\*\\-\\\\\ _c
a) O C ,_, O •L ,,.\-,�
\\ \�•
(6 a) U) U) 0 \\),•..,,,,,,p
\
CL
CZ cis C U -t-� -:,:<,.:\ '47-1
��� \�,, o
CZ
a) 0 a) N c Q+= CZ \`�` t\\', <••• 0
U) 0 > E --, (6 \
co
CL
I MS
CN
CN
- \:‘,\\,,
K: a
coC
(N CO0
N N +J
,� r- U
a) _ 0
CO CO W
4-,
CL. CON
N N 0
Cl) CL
c �' N O
.0 NCO
O
N N NCV
Q. N--CO N- N-
•�
N N CV NN-
1--
U)
CV N N F-
i ILA N N r- • O (�
-7
CO CO O O CC
u_
II Z
i
\\(...........;_
I +
- �rrufa+rr+,a,ar,ar,�■a
i i I
j
.ruu�r,�rta,i i.....,.„,
E
rrwL urun�n a;
, 1
i
0
R° 1 a
U 4,
m ~
t9
, vp,
MOORE RD 73
pAW lED SKK/1}}�� M
E(EMFIIIAR1ro R co SIAM PAW >
- p :iii Irf 2 •
' r 8
■ OR n s
1■W�.'j
rMT�7GrAY■NWrDGwOD RYN/GE rrRD"u P O
1
S O
SO '
ERIVE RD
e` el'" ,
I NtS �"J N,u,iY
ELEHEI5110
- •
JijH W NARANJA DR 0
HIT O«
o CAa I
Z u ,::::(VI!
m.rt_nrr
ZZZoLAMBERT LN O
i Z — n
� Z ,Iiwr+qrrM.Ni.y ��
_ ____ . . _ _
r�
1 Y D � o,jt d 1
I m -
�s..mi A r
♦
o!jr
p rt•-
fd
D
. h o
W LINDA VISTA BL °-
pusarRrDGE
i �r� ares nan Aw,DExr
nroR..r d
grj /
r W O V } W CA tONCORDIA_ R
i ■
N
z r2 .
O W HARDY_ITIS
O D
,
st
Wr
ip OAI
ELEMNEHHDCEDOL
xJ d • i
I A I! r
. D A WI:I LATE MEARI ----,.yw■w■,.�.r+war<r+u.,...a.a+=r,..-+r<.w.:s:au..t...«
MDO(E t RICH
SCNOOL� ,.
WMAGEERD i fi ��
Q-r
�+ M/MACULAlE i '')4.—'�`
i ACADEMY
�� MAGEE R CROSS n��
"C'I'SCfr,�yL ni .-
d L4 i` .a■ar�trna�G��
f.
HARt4YON NWRi1ED
ELEMFNIARY SCIen_ 4
i 4 W INA RD
u ------1-
Legend
-Legend
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY Parks&Recreation
General Plan Update 2020 6 School R Planned Park:Rancho Vistoso PAD Map
-.......Oro Valley Limits Planned Park:Lambert Lane
General Plan Update Planning Area 1iii Planned Park:Naranja Town Site Source:This map was made with data
Planned CDO Linear Park from ESRI,Oro Valley,and Pima County.
''''''...4411k.....'"'"`_ Private Park
This map is for illustration purposes only;
E----1 Public Park official interpretations are available from
N I I Semi-Public Park&Recreation Oro Valley Planning Zoning staff.
W 4., L Oro Valley GIS Services
i I Public School Field
1 May 29,2003
;Millio 0.5 1 2 Figure 5
100.1.11 Miles