The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPackets - Council Packets (1085) **AMENDED (1/28/05, 2:00 p.m.) AGENDA ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION FEBRUARY 2, 2005 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE **. . - a , A $ - A -• a ` ►1 CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL ** _ MI . . a - • - -• ! ` ►1 e A I $ A ! A —e- "e- • a a A •-e e Ae a -e � "ems purchase/lease of real property for Town Facilities **REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS —TOWN MANAGER COUNCIL REPORTS DEPARTMENT REPORTS TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT The Mayor and Council may consider and/or take action on the items listed below: ORDER OF BUSINESS: MAYOR WILL REVIEW THE ORDER OF THE MEETING CALL TO AUDIENCE — At this time, any member of the public is allowed to address the Mayor and Town Council on any issue not listed on today's agenda. Pursuant to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, individual Council Members may ask Town Staff to review the matter, ask that the matter be placed on a future agenda, or respond to criticism made by speakers. However, the Mayor and Council may not discuss or take legal action on matters raised during "Call to Audience." In order to speak during "Call to Audience" please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. 1. CONSENT AGENDA (Consideration and/or possible action) A. Minutes — 12-15-04; 01-05-05; 01-13-05 02/02/05 Agenda, Council Regular Session 2 n (R) 05-05 the Town to submit a prioritized list of B. Resolutio Authorizing Dg CapitalImprovements a Im rovements Program Projects (CIP)to the Pima County Regional Flood Control District C. Opp V12-03-34 Approval of 6 month extension to June 23, 2005 of the PreliminaryPlat for Stone Canyon VII, located north of Tortolita Mountain Circle in Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 11, portion of Parcel 219-05-011A 2. PUBLIC HEARING — ORDINANCE NO. (0)05-08 OV8-04-07 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A NEW CLUBHOUSE FACILITY AT THE ORO VALLEY COUNTRY CLUB, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF GREENOCK DRIVE AND VALLE DEL ORO ROAD, PARCELS #224-34-1650, 224-35-0810, 224-35-0820, 224-35-0830, 224- 35-0350, 224-35-0360, 224-35-0370 & 224-35-0910 3. **RESCHEDULING THE REGULAR MEETING FROM WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 2005 TO TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 15, 2005 4. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS (The Council may bring forth general topics for future meeting agendas.endas. Council may not discuss, deliberate or take any action on the topics presented pursuant to ARS 38-431.02H) CALL TO AUDIENCE — At this time, any member of the public is allowed to address the Mayor and Town Council on any issue not listed on today's y agenda. Pursuant to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, individual Council Members mayask Town Staff to review the matter, ask that the matter be placed on a future agenda, or respond to criticism made by speakers. However, the may Mayor and Councilnot discuss or take legal action on matters raised during y "Call to Audience." In order to speak during "Call to Audience" please specify whaty ou wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. ADJOURNMENT POSTED: 01/21/05 AMENDED AGENDA POSTED: 01/28/05 4:30p.m. 2:00 p.m. lh lh When � a packet acket of agenda materials as listed above is available for p public inspection at least 24 hours prior to the Council meeting in the office of the Town Clerk between the hours of 8:00 a.m. — 5:00p.m. complies The Town of Oro Valley with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If any pdisability with a needs any type of accommodation, please notify the Town Clerk's Office at 229-4700. 02/02/05 Agenda, Council Regular Session 3 INSTRUCTIONS TO SPEAKERS Members of thepublic have the right to speak during any posted public hearing. However, those items not listed as a public hearing are for consideration and action bythe Town Council during the course of their business meeting. Members of the public may be allowed to speak on these topics at the discretion of the Chair. Ify ou wish to address the Town Council on any item(s) on this agenda, please p a complete speaker card located on the Agenda table at the back of the room p andg ive it to the Town Clerk. Please indicate on the speaker card which item number and topic you wish to speak on, or if you wish to speak during "Call to Audience", please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card. Please step forward to the podium when the Mayor announces the item(s) on the agenda which you are interested in addressing. 1. Please state your name and address for the record. 2. Speak only on the issue currently being discussed by Council. Please organize your speech, you will only be allowed to address the Council g once regarding the topic being discussed. 3. Please limit your comments to 3 minutes. 4. During "Call to Audience" you may address the Council on any issue you wish. 5. Any member of the public speaking must speak in a courteous and respectful manner to those present. Thank you for your cooperation. OA071i „P �eY `iT. E>s �`h.r.. ?j4' :'i. r 3i• ifLk 'so,s sy js b�f'£`Y�i v 3s ii*Icoo.r> Atisiolnk.,-*IP 4400 00, ':'V'tj .F A. .vytv"'x>Y s.l+s2Ef'w yYY `.,+ t 41, O a}: r 0` UNDER 4 Office of the Town Attorney Memo To: Honorable Mayor and Council From: Tobin Sidles, Acting Town Attorney 1— A5t CC: Chuck Sweet, Town Manager Date: January 28, 2005 Re: Monterey Homes Condemnation Attorney-Client Privileged This is to inform you that the Executive Session regarding this matter on February 2, 2005 has been cancelled. Per previous discussions the attorney has enough direction to proceed at this time without further direction, and there is nothing new to report at this time. I will be sending you a status report on the matter when necessary. DRAFT MINUTES ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION DECEMBER 15, 2004 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 5:30 PM CALL TO ORDER 5:35 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Paul Loomis, Mayor Paula Abbott, Vice Mayor K.C. Carter, Council Member Conny Culver, Council Member Helen Dankwerth, Council Member Barry Gillaspie, Council Member Terry Parish, Council Member EXECUTIVE SESSION AT OR AFTER 5:30 PM MOTION: A MOTION was made by Council Member Dankwerth and SECONDED by Council Member Culver to go into Executive Session at 5:36 p.m. for the following purpose: 1. Pursuant to ARS 38-431.03 (A)(7)Discussion/consultation regarding the Oro Valley Service Center Lease 2. Pursuant to ARS 38-431.03 (A)(3) & (A)(4) Legal Advice, direction and settlement authoritypertaining to a lawsuit filed September 17, 2004 regarding La Canada Drive/Lambert Lane Development/Extension of landscape completion date (OV12-02-06 and 6A) (Beztak Companies) MOTION CARRIED, 7 —0. Mayor Loomis announced that in addition to the Town Council, the Town Manager, the Town Attorney, and the Deputy Town Clerk, Police Chief Sharp and Finance Director David Andrews would be present in Executive Session for Item 1 and Community Development Director Brent Sinclair, Planning and Zoning Administrator Bryant Nodine, Finance Director David Andrews, and Brad Woodford, Outside Legal Counsel from Moyes Storey Law Offices would be present in Executive Session for Item 2. MOTION: A MOTION was made by Council Member Culver and SECONDED by Council Member Parish to go out of Executive Session at 6:42 p.m. Motion carried, 7— 0. RESUME REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 7:00 PM 12/15/04 Minutes, Council Regular Session 2 CALL TO ORDER at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Paul Loomis, Mayor Paula Abbott, Vice Mayor K.C. Carter, Council Member Conny Culver, Council Member Helen Dankwerth, Council Member Barry Gillaspie, Council Member PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Loomis led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS Town Manager Chuck Sweet reviewed the upcoming meetings and events. He also announced that the Town Hall offices would be closed on December 24th for the Christmas Holiday and December 31St for the New Year Holiday. TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT No report. COUNCIL REPORTS Council Member Gillaspie reported that he attended that Governor's hearing concerning state drought issues and found the session to be very informative. DEPARTMENT REPORTS Chief Sharp reported that the"Kindervision Event for Child Safety" would be held on January 2, 2005, in conjunction with Northwest Medical Center Community Open House. He also reported that the "Driving Under the Influence Units In-Car Video Systems" grant had been approved by the State of Arizona. ORDER OF BUSINESS: Mayor Loomis announced that this would be the last official meeting to be held in 2004 and wished everyone a happy holiday season. CALL TO AUDIENCE Jim Kreigh, 40 East Calle Concordia, reported that many citizens that lived in the Shadow Mountain Estates including himself, were unaware of the new construction for the new water lines installation for the neighborhood. He asked that the Town be more cognizant in keeping the citizens abreast to these types of projects and give the citizens an opportunity to address these types of issues. 12/15/04 Minutes, Council Regular Session 3 1. CONSENT AGENDA pe Council Member Gillaspie requested that Item E be pulled from the Consent Agenda. Council Member Carter requested that Item H be pulled from the Consent Agenda. MOTION: Council Member Dankwerth moved to APPROVE the Consent Agenda with the exception of Item E and Item H. Council Member Gillaspie SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 7-0. A. Minutes— 11/29/04 B. Police Department Report - November 2004 C. Building Safety Activity Report—November 2004 D. Coyote Run Monthly Report—November 2004 E. Resolution No. (R)04-126 Authorizing a construction contract between the Town of Oro Valley and K E & G Development, LLC. in the amount of $483,400.00 to construct Shadow Mountain Estates 12-inch"D" Zone Water Main (PULLED FOR DISCUSSION) F. Resolution No. (R)04-127 In cooperation with other Northwest Area Municipal Water Providers, to state the critical importance of a Reliability p Reservoir for Central Arizona Project Water in the Northwest Tucson Active Management Area to ensure the future potable Water Supply for its customers G. Resolution No. (R) 04-128 Authorizing and approving the execution of an intergovernmental agreement between Pima County and the Town of Oro Valley for the construction of the Oro Valley Public Library Expansion Project H. Resolution No. (R) 04-129 Authorizing and approving the execution of an intergovernmental agreement between Pima County Free Library District and the Town of Oro Valley for provision and payment of Library Services (PULLED FOR DISCUSSION) I. Resolution No. (R)04-130 Declaring as a public record that certain document filed with the Town Clerk and entitled "The 2002 Amendments to the Tax Code of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona" J. Resolution No. (R)04-131 Authorizing and Approving the Town to enter into a Development (Service) Agreement by and between the Town of Oro Valley and approving a Development Agreement with Canada Hills Homeowners Association for Police Department Traffic Enforcement on Private Streets K. Resolution No. (R)04-132 Authorizing and Approving a HIPAA Business Associate Agreement between Golder Ranch Fire District ("Golder Ranch") and the Town of Oro Valley L. Resolution No. (R)04-133 Authorizing and Approving a HIPAA Business Associate Agreement between Rural Metro Fire Department ("Rural Metro") and the Town of Oro Valley M. OV12-04-06 Approval of a Final Plat for The Uplands at Lambert Lane, a 16 lot single family subdivision, located west of the CDO Riverfront Park and 12/15/04 Minutes, Council Regular Session 4 1/8 mile west from the intersection of La Canada Drive and Lambert Lane within the El Conquistador Planned Area Development, Parcel 224-24-1570 N. Extension of the appointment of members of the Oro Valley Grievance Review Board E. RESOLUTION NO. (R)04-126 AUTHORIZING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT BETWEEN THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY AND K E & G DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C. IN THE AMOUNT OF $483,400.00 TO CONSTRUCT SHADOW MOUNTAIN ESTATES 12-INCH "D" ZONE WATER MAIN MOTION: Council Member Gillaspie moved that this item be CONTINUED to January 19, 2005, to allow Town staff to meet with citizens and answer questions they might have. Vice Mayor Abbott SECONDED the motion. Discussion: Vice Mayor Abbott suggested that rather than placing a time limit on staff, she would recommend that this item be postponed indefinitely so that staff could send the mailing notifications to the appropriate individuals in the area. She explained that the notifications may take longer than expected; therefore, would like to leave the time limit more opened ended. Council Member Gillaspie stated that he would not be inclined to accept the explanation and would prefer, in this case, to have the Town management level inform the Council as to what would be the appropriate time to notice the residents in the area. He explained that there were contracts of bids pending and he would not want to delay the process for too long. He stated that one (1) month should be a sufficient amount of time to notify all of the citizens in the area. In answer to a question from Mayor Loomis, Project Manager David Ruiz explained that he was unsure what the impact on the existing pending bids would be if there was a continuance but he would inform the Council of any stipulations. He further explained that this project would integrate the Tucson Water Well into the Oro Valley Water Utility system to the south of Oro Valley. He explained that this was necessary and was in conjunction with the Town Capital Improvement Plan Expansion as it related to the South Oracle "D" Zone project. Council Member Parish was opposed to the motion of stalling the project and stated that the Town was taking the appropriate measures in taking care of the neighborhood. He agreed that the citizens should be notified before the project started but he felt the Town should continue to move forward. Council Member Gillaspie stated that in his opinion the Council had a very bad track record involving Town citizens in the decision making and the creation of new projects. He stated that the Town needed to focus on improving "public communication"when planning projects. 1 / 2 15/04 Minutes, Council Regular Session 5 MOTION carried, 4-3, with Mayor Loomis, Council Culver and Council Member Parish opposed. H. RESOLUTION NO. (R) 04-129 AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING THE EXECUTION OF AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN PIMA COUNTY FREE LIBRARY DISTRICT AND THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY FOR PROVISION AND PAYMENT OF LIBRARY SERVICES MOTION: Council Member Carter moved to APPROVE Resolution No. (R) 04-129, approving an Intergovernmental Agreement between the Town of Oro Valley and Pima g County Board of Supervisors for the provision and payment of library services to the Town of Oro Valley for the operation and maintenance of the Oro Valley Public Library. Council Member Culver SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 7-0. 2. PRESENTATION OF STATUS OF RECLAIMED WATER SYSTEM PROJECT Project Director David Ruiz reported that in an effort to keep the Town Council and the public abreast of the status of the Town's reclaimed water systemproject, staff has agreed to provide frequent updates during regularly scheduled Council meetings. He reviewed the following segments of the Reclaimed Water Project: • Phase I • Reclaimed Water System Project Update • Reclaimed Water Pipeline • Projected completion(February 2005) • Reservoir and Booster Pump Station • Tucson Water Thornydale Booster Pump Station No action was required for this item. 3. RESOLUTION NO. (R)04-134 PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, ORACLE ROAD IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT BONDS; APPROVING THE SALE OF THE BONDS TO THE UNDERWRITER; AND PRESCRIBING TERMS AND PROVISIONS OF THE BONDS; APPOINTING A REGISTRAR, TRANSFER AGENT AND PAYING AGENT WITH RESPECT TO THE BONDS; APPROVING THE FORM OF CONTRACT FOR SUCH REGISTRAR, TRANSFER AGENT AND PAYING AGENT; MAKING CERTAIN TAX COVENANTS; RATIFYING ALL ACTIONS TAKEN WITH RESPECT TO THE PREPARATION AND DISSEMINATION OF AN OFFERING STATEMENT; APPROVING A FORM OF OFFICIAL STATEMENT; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE OFFICIAL STATEMENT; AND AUTHORIZING CIRCULATION OF THE OFFICIAL STATEMENT 12/15/04 Minutes, Council Regular Session 6 Finance Director David Andrews reported that this resolution would authorize the issuance of$5,535,000.00 of the Town's special assessment revenue bonds for the Oracle Road Improvement District. He explained that the approval of this resolution would also approve the execution of all related documents, and position the Town to move forward with funding for the construction of roadway improvements within the district. He introduced Scott Ruby, Bond Counsel with Gust Rosenfeld, who reviewed the following information identifying the sources and uses of funds for the district: SOURCES: Bond proceeds at Par $5,535,000 Bond Premium 83,476 Town Contributions 450,000 Total Sources for Funds: $6,068,476 USE: Construction and Engineering Costs $5,535,400 Capitalized Interest 247,696 Cost of Issuance and Underwriter's Fees 285,380 Total Uses of Funds: $6,068,476 MOTION: Council Member Parish moved to APPROVE Resolution No. (R) 04-134, authorizing the Issuance of Town of Oro Valley, Oracle Road Improvement District, Special Assessment Revenue Bonds, Series 2005. Council Member Dankwerth SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 7-0. 4. PUBLIC HEARING—ORDINANCE NO. (0)04-45 AUTHORIZING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN ORO VALLEY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Community Development Director Brent Sinclair reported that approval of this ordinance would allow for the Town to begin the process of bringing together a Historic Preservation Commission, and that the staff report reflected the guidelines for the selection of the commission. Town Manager Chuck Sweet explained that due to some feedback and concerns from Council members, staff was submitting an amended motion and ordinance that addresses some of their concerns. Council Member Culver explained that this idea had been a long time coming and that everyone has been working very hard to have the Town formally adopt a Historic Commission. She reported that the Town was looking to acquire some historic properties in the near future and would very much like to see this item move forward. She explained that this would be a Commission that met the needs of the Town which was growing very rapidly and historic preservation was very important and necessary. 12/15/04 Minutes, Council Regular Session 7 Member Gillaspie had concerns with the fact that a Commission was being Council P formed without havingdefined what the Commission's task would be and the number of members that would be on the Commission. He stated that the duties and responsibilities should have been identified before the ordinance came forward to Council. Vice Mayor Abbottagreed and explained that the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board did not have ample time to review any of the Council's concerns; therefore, (PRAB) P g PRAB should opportunityiven an be to review theissues and address some of the concerns. The following issues were identified and discussed: • What kind of authority would Council be rendering to the Commission if a comprehensive preservation ordinance was developed? • Thep �u ose of creating the Historical Commission and how it will benefit the community. . • Does the enablingcriteria given to the Commission provide sufficient direction and ability to meet the requirements for the Federal Historic Preservation local authority or will the ordinance need to be further refined? MayorLoomis opened the public hearing. There being no speakers Mayor Loomis closed p the public hearing. MOTION: Council Member Culver moved to APPROVE Ordinance No. (0) 04-45 as amended and to direct an initial interview panel consisting of a Town Council member, the Town Historian and the Community Development Director be established to interview Oro Valley citizens who are interested in serving on the newly created Historic Preservation Commission. Council Member Dankwerth seconded the motion. AMENDMENT: Council Member Gillaspie moved to add to Section 2 of Ordinance (0)04-45 —Item A to read, "Membership shall consist of SEVEN(7)members". Council Member Culver and Council member Dankwerth agreed to the amendment. Vice Mayor Abbott stated that she did not see any harm with moving forward with the proposal, but she would like to see that PRAB ultimately develop an appropriate number of individuals that would eventually serve on the Commission and that PRAB provide some input. Mayor Loomis stated that he was opposed to the motion because the Council has verbally requested at previouslymeetings that information pertaining to issues such as this be q submitted in a timely manner. He explained that the changes that have been made to the ordinance, and Council receiving the information the night of the Council meeting was unacceptable. He stated that Council should have adequate time to review material prior to the meetings. 12/15/04 Minutes, Council Regular Session 8 Vice Mayor Abbott agreed but stated she would vote in favor of the ordinance because this was a preliminary procedure and general guidelines that could always be revised and added to. MOTION carried, 5-2, with Mayor Loomis and Council Member Carter opposed. Mayor Loomis recessed the meeting at 8:01 p.m. The meeting resumed at 8:07 p.m. 5. PUBLIC HEARING—ORDINANCE NO. (0)04-46 TO AMEND A CONDITION OF REZONING APPROVAL —REGARDING PERMITTED BUILDING HEIGHTS FOR THE 8.35 ACRE SITE COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE "OLD BUS BARN", LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF DESERT SKY ROAD AND VALLE DEL ORO ROAD, PARCEL NUMBERS 224-33-007A, 224-33-008A AND 224-33-011A David Ground, the applicant, stated that he was requesting a maximum of ten 2-story homes in the center of the development, and a maximum of four two story homes on the east side of the site. He reported that there would be no 2-story homes on the north, west or south sides of the site. The following concerns were identified and discussed: • The letters submitted in support of the revision. • Field Crest Lane proximity to the site. • How the homes would infringe in proximity to other homes in the community. • Site and view shed analysis. • Building height for single-story homes and 2-story homes. • Ingress and Egress points. Community Development Director Brent Sinclair reported that on August 18, 2004, by Ordinance No. (0) 04-24, the Town Council approved the rezoning with the Planning and Zoning Commission's design standards and with an additional condition that restricts all 45 lots to one-story homes. He reported that after some discussion regarding the type of households the project would likely accommodate, the size of the homes, the number of school-aged children it might generate, and potential age restrictions on homebuyers, the Council took the following action, "Council Member Culver moved to approve Ordinance No. (0) 04-24, OVO-04-01, Desert Sky Zoning Map Amendment, Site Analysis and TDP, subject to all homes being one story which would be more conducive to "empty nesters". Council Member Abbott seconded the Motion. Motion carried 5-2, with Vice Mayor Abbott and Council Member Gillaspie opposed." Mayor Loomis opened that public hearing. John Lupo, 9614 North Golden Sun Drive, stated that he was against the request and that he was very concerned about the influx of traffic. He asked that the developer create an exit gate to reduce the amount of traffic on Egleston Drive and Desert Sky. 12/15/04 Minutes, Council Regular Session 9 Ken Sc representing g p oville resentin Amphitheater Public School, thanked the developer for gr entering into a donation agreement with Amphitheater Public Schools and, stated that he was in total support of the development moving forward. Mayor Loomis closed the public hearing. pp Mayor Loomis was opposed to the motion as stated because the single-story homes were y supported and would be aestheticallycorrect throughout the zoning district. Also, he felt that the architectural uniqueness was not a sufficient rationale to support the change of approval for the 2-story homes. Mayor Loomis expressed concern with the "stand-offs"between the adjacent property and the apartments in the vicinity, and other communities that would be impacted by the revision. Council Member Culver stated that the revision would be inconsistent with the low scale residential homes in the community and the proximity of the 2-story homes was too close to other homes. Vice Mayor Abbott stated for the record that she based her decision to approve or disapprove a development plan upon its merits and not if the developer has or has not made a voluntary contribution. She stated that the reason she will oppose the proposal was because she believes the density and mass of the development was unacceptable and inconsistent with the low scale residential character of the neighborhood. Also, she had concerns with some of the safety issues that were identified. MOTION: Council Member Culver moved to DENY OV9-04-01 A, Desert Sky Zoning MapAmendment to the Town Council based on the following findings: there would be a negative visual impact and approval would create a much larger scale than is characteristic of the area. Vice Mayor Abbott SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 6-1, with Council Member Parish opposed. 6. PUBLIC HEARING- ORDINANCE NO. (0)04-47 ADOPTING REVISIONS TO THE "TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PERSONNEL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES CODE" BY REFERENCE AND FIXING THE EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF; REPEALING ALL RESOLUTIONS, ORDINANCES, AND RULES OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY IN CONFLICT THEREWITH; AND PRESERVING THE RIGHTS AND DUTIES THAT HAVE ALREADY MATURED AND PROCEEDINGS THAT HAVE ALREADY BEGUN THEREUNDER p Mayor Loomis opened the floor for public comments. There being no speakers, Mayor Y Loomis closed the public hearing. MOTION: Vice Mayor Abbott moved to ADOPT Ordinance (0) 04-47, amending the Town of Oro Valley Personnel Policies and Procedures Code. Council Member Carter 12/15/04 Minutes, Council Regular Session 10 SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 7-0. 7. RESOLUTION NO. (R)04-135 ADDING ITEM 17 TO THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVE POLICY GUIDELINES AUTHORIZING ALL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS AS A REFERABLE ITEM SUBJECT TO THE REFERENDUM PROCESSES OUTLINED IN THE ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. Jerry Hoy, 3380 West Westfall Drive, representing the Northern Pima County Chamber of Commerce, stated that he was against the resolution because the Economic Development Incentives Agreements (EDA) would be subject to later ratification by the voters. Therefore, he had concerns with how the resolution would impact businesses in the communities. He explained that business did not like uncertainty and this resolution would kill any interest a developer might have in Town projects because it would lengthen the process. Art Segal, 10148 North Bighorn Butte Drive, stated that he was in support of the resolution because he agreed that it was appropriate to give the citizens an opportunity to vote on issues pertaining to new businesses coming into the area. Chet Oldakowski, 11706 North Via De La Verbrenita, a representative from "Stop Oro Valley Outrageous Give-A-Ways" organization, had concerns with EDAs because there were tools involved and used improperly. He suggested that a safety program be implemented. MOTION: Vice Mayor Abbott moved to APPROVE Resolution No. (R) 04-135, a resolution of the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, to add Item #17 to the Economic Development Incentive Policy Guidelines authorizing all Economic Development Agreements to be referable items subject to the referendum processes outlined in the Arizona Revised Statutes. Council Member Carter SECONDED the motion. Discussion: Council Member Culver explained that there were other EDAs that could be reviewed, such as, a reduction in fees and fast tracking developments. She stated that if the Council made these items referable, the Town could lose businesses that were wanted in the area. She explained that part of her platform was to make Oro Valley a "business friendly" Town. She said that by approving this resolution, that message would do the Town more harm than good. Council Member Gillaspie stated that this issue has been sufficiently heard over the past few meetings and he believed that the will of the majority at this point should be clear. He stated that he feared that the topic does not favorably represent the Town for the Council's desire to modify and adopt approved policies that would both allow and protect 12/15/04 Minutes, Council Regular Session 11 ure activities relatin to economic development. He said for that reason, he possible fut g would vote against the motion. Council Member Parish stated that he did not believe that EDAs should be made referable because businesses want to know when and if a deal is final. He explained that he viewed the issue as being a choice between having a property tax or not having a property tax in Oro Valley. He explained that if the Town does not develop economically prop y Y p to bringmoneyin from outside sources, Pinal County will take over in the building developmentcategory.cate or . He stated that he was against making EDAs referable and always will be. Vice Mayor Abbott explained that for Council to say that they would never make a Y wrong decision or mistake was arrogant. She explained that there was a lot of work involved in the referendum process and people were not going to "jump the gun" in using it. However, in her opinion the check and balances were missing in the policy and she p felt it was needed. She stated that she wanted to do everything possible to make EDAs referable to theeo le. She explained that she was concerned with what EDAs will do to p p existing businesses but she was confident that this was the appropriate thing to do. She asked that Item#17 be incorporated into the existing EDA policy. Council Member Parish called for the question. MOTION failed 2-5, with Council Member Carter and Vice Mayor Abbott in favor. 8. DISCUSSION CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING METHODS FOR IMPROVED COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN THE TOWN COUNCIL AND CITIZENS Council Member Dankwerth said that with regard to the "guest editorial column", she suggests that the information be routinely submitted by the Public Information Officer, gg informing the public of important issues that would be addressed at future meetings, givingthe citizens various view points of upcoming issues prior to action taken by Council and routinely informing the citizen what Council has done for them. suggested Mayor Loomis creating a paid advertisement section in the newspaper such as Y a"Town Page" to announce upcoming meetings and events. Council Member Carter suggested meeting with the people on a personal level. Vice Mayor Abbott added that the Council should have meetings in 2005 to meet with the citizens in an open house setting. Mayor Loomis briefly addressed the "pros" and"cons" of each of the following items identified in the staff report submitted for consideration and approval: 1. Inserts in Town-wide Water Utility Billings 2. Web logs (or"blog"). 12/15/04 Minutes, Council Regular Session 12 3. Newsletter and Community Calendar. 4. Access Tucson. 5. Listing of Council votes by agenda item. 6. Listserve (0-Mail"). 7. Streaming video of Town Council meetings 8. Videotape of Council meetings by Access Tucson. 9. Live Council broadcast requirement in Cable Franchise 10. Enhanced outreach by Council members to community groups. 11. Purchase of advertising space in a community newspaper. 12. Submission of a guest editorial or column in a community newspaper. MOTION: Vice Mayor Abbott moved to DIRECT the Town Manager to pursue options #4, #5, #6, #10 and#12 to help increase Town Council communications with citizens and direct the Town Manager to bring other options forward for consideration as part of the 2005 —2006 Budget. Council Member Culver SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 7-0. 9. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT THINK TANK AND ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP AND MEETING DATES OUTLINE Jeffrey Weir, Economic Development Administrator, explained that the "Think Tank" will focus on considering what has not been thought of for the future economic blueprint for Oro Valley. He reported that by using various techniques such as brainstorming, this group is expected to "think outside of the box" and not fee compelled to continue doing what works now. He reported that their focus is on the future economic considerations and directions that the Town should prepare for. MOTION: Council Member Carter moved to deny the Economic Development Think Tank and Advisory Committee Membership and Meeting Dates Outline. Vice Mayor Abbott SECONDED the motion. Council Member Carter stated that he was opposed to the "Think Tank" concept because Town management had let him down on November 22nd regarding the concept because he knew nothing about the committee and was misinformed and felt this was not the right thing to do with Town money. Council Member Dankwerth explained that it has been abundantly clear that the Council wanted to have representatives from various areas of the community with specific areas of expertise take part in a group that would review what was currently being done as a community with regard to community development and possibly come up with unique and creative ideas. She added that these ideas might or might not be considered in the future. She stated that the Town should proceed with the concept of the "Think Tank" and adhere to the dates that have been set forth on the calendar; and name and the citizens who wish to be a part of the initial "Think Tank", engage the service of a qualified facilitator; and consider the work the Town staff is doing with regard to investigation of 12/15/04 Minutes, Council Regular Session 13 what other town yg and cities of varying sizes in Arizona are doing to further their economic basis and to provide diverse sources of income for their town. Abbott explained that because of the magnitude of the responsibility that the Vice Mayor p subcommittee represents, she stated that it was critical that this committee reflect an p representation of the re p equal Council and because there was no Council appointee representative on this committee, she could not support the proposition. She stated that in her opinion, this was not a very democratic approach. Council Member pointed Gillaspie out that soon after the new Council Members took office a study session was held regarding the idea of an economic think tank regarding EDAs and subject to that, there have been public study sessions. At that point, there were no objections to forming a committee such as this one, so he did not understand Council Member Carter's comment. Council Member Parish called for the question. MOTION failed, 2-5,with Vice Mayor Abbott and Council Member Carter in favor./ Council Member Dankwerth clarified that this was a"task force"with a specific time limit. MOTION: Council Member Dankwerth moved to ADOPT the"Think Tank" as proposed byJeff Weir, Economic Development Administrator; that it be a time limited p task force oriented entity inclusive of the members listed on attachment "A" (members 1 "ThinkTank") and that it meet between the dates of January 8th and through 12 under Januarypp 16th, and have opportunities for a special/study session to which the public will be encouraged to offer their input on February 16th, 2005. Council Member Parish SECONDED the motion. There was discussion regarding the function of the commission and development. The following topics were discussed: • The outline of the proposed calendar. • The timeline for amendment for the EDA revisions previously brought forward. • When the information was brought forward to Council for this item. • The selection of the members for the "Think Tank Task Force." • Where would the $4500 come from to support the "Think Tank"which would be listed as a special project? MOTION carried, 5-2, with Vice Mayor Abbott and Council Member Carter opposed. The following is a list of the "Think Tank"members: 1. Al Cook 2. Chet Oldakowski 3. Eric Shapiro 12/15/04 Minutes, Council Regular Session 14 4. Ray Paolino 5. Bob Schwartz 6. Tim Booth 7. Paul Kappelman 8. Mary Pearce 9. Rob LaMaster 10. Kit Donley 11. Gregg Forszt 12. Kim Stine 10. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS In answer to a question from Vice Mayor Abbott, Mayor Loomis reiterated that staff was aware of the openings on the commissions; and the Planning and Zoning Commission had not taken any action at this point on the Commercial Code. CALL TO AUDIENCE Art Segal, 10148 North Bighorn Butte Drive, on behalf of the La Reserve Community Association, thanked Finance Director David Andrews for being so accommodating and helpful in answering any questions the community might have regarding Town issues. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Council Member Culver moved to adjourn the meeting at 9:45 p.m. Council Member Parish SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 7-0. Respectfully submitted, Linda Hersha, Senior Office Assistant I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the regular session of the Town of Oro Valley Council of Oro Valley, Arizona held on the_15th_day of December 2004. I further certify that the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present. Dated this day of ,2004. Kathryn E. Cuvelier, CMC Town Clerk MINUTES ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION JANUARY 05, 2005 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 5:30 PM CALL TO ORDER 5:35 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Paul Loomis, Mayor ��' t:�:%,%iv:lii: Paula Abbott, Vice Mayor ,, J'r.:Jr, K.C. Carter, Council Member '�..:�: i.• Conny Culver, Council Me -• <A>y Helen Dankwerth, Coun ':.:"a.+l, %iv'�i..y�;;x:„„ Barry Gillaspie, Coun /,i': �l� t:� ember Terry Parish, Coun 1y.f f J �� . EXECUTIVE SESSION AT OR AFTER 5:30 P • A MOTION made by / �'%` SECONDED by MOTION +� � � �R�f��y�. ber �+�'b�`. erth and was :�.�r � ��/, ; ;` , �Y�� ;:/!: p m for the following Council Member Carter to go into Execu �Y Se ''ire -%_:f. . f%fH.:v,://.%.J Y�'��.'/.. purpose: : f% Migt'4) , 1 y',: (3) with the Town Attorn y •Pursuant to ARS 38 '�'�}yy Consultation Attorney � for Legal Advice a; c4,4#1,0:0,4 J� sc -on reg y' gthe Pager P a Litigation 2• Pursuant to AR 7:11 & ( ) Consultation with the Acting Town ,fs y n','• .f',.w,, -yv:"f relating to the purchase/lease of real Attorney for Leg. mr �f ° ut .x ,: y �-s property fo •wn °y: ' es r/ ,.:-4 t .::; ' A 3 & (A)(4) Legal Advice, direction and 3. Pursua�>�a" "v#�? �x �,� )( )ti auth• ;9erta to a lawsuit filed September 17, 2004 regarding La settle ; :1:44`4,4, Ca.'0•1�� rive/La :, , ?� 4� '�� . Lane Development/Extension of landscape completion date y.�•y"5�[ 6A) Com anies) •�:�f�F`p��-02-06 Jipp MOTION CARRI 0 'yi4t�9",,r�-,' • Mayor Loomis announced that in addition to the Town Council, the Town Manager, the y Town Attorney and the Town Clerk, Finance Director David Andrews would also be present for all three items, Police Chief Danny Sharp would be present in Executive Session for Item 1; John Brady, Outside Legal Counsel from Chandler Udall, Attorneys at Law, would be present for Item 2; and Brad Woodford, Outside Legal Counsel from Moyes Storey, Attorneys at Law, Community Development Director Brent Sinclair, Planning and Zoning Administrator Bryant Nodine and Town Engineer Bill Jansen would be present for Item 3. MOTION: A MOTION was made by Council Member Parish and SECONDED by Council Member Carter to go out of Executive Session at 6:46 p.m. Motion carried, 7-0. 01/05/05 Minutes,Town Council Regular Session 2 RESUME REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Paul Loomis, Mayor Paula Abbott, Vice Mayor K.C. Carter, Council Member Conny Culver, Council Member Helen Dankwerth, Council Member Barry Gillaspie, Council Member Terry Parish, Council Member PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ,0 Mayor Loomis led the audience in the Pledge of Allegianc ogit x?5;%UPCOVINMEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS ' ;` Miltr '4Ya.l Town Manager Chuck Sweet reviewed the upco y, % - e s and events. He also announced that the Town Hall complex would be cio-,,c,:wo J anuary 17, 2005 in honor of Civil Right's Day. : F:J::'. • .��.,.l�r`.i$'.Cfr.,/!!<Y//N�"o�/..Ff 'N'J":.':c..�/y'<w..;4f•�%�.i:y...r'>:. Y'/rl/r.:Nr:".�,/'.0 fi`f,/f.'.'SL�C'4`�`:... COUNCIL REPORTS—No reports. +aar rr . Y' 'yti•� :.,::,Y y DEPARTMENT REPORT ry `"`y ,g !cle Road Town Engineer Bill Ja .-4t�� eport;�r��, . .the Irr�: Improvement District(GRID) construction would be i"-+- '"' ' .: m :''�o ''`'" ' f t Y uary.) He stated that initial meetings would be held wit the ax " ses in the construction area and Town staff would continue to ke-=N -sse--`%„4;t...ublic informed durin the process. . TOWNi.. ::rrfrr.GER'S ' .I RT.. .dfF'. Yf... �.%. e. Town Manager , 7:.¢ reported that the Town is establishing a collection point for items for the tsuna" 9r quake victims. Items will be collected at the Oro Valley Public Library during'ormal business hours and then the donated items would be transported to WorldCare in Tucson and sent to the victims. ORDER OF BUSINESS: There being no objections, Mayor Loomis moved Item 14 up on the Agenda to follow the Consent Agenda. He also moved Item 2 to follow Item 4. CALL TO AUDIENCE—No speakers. 1. CONSENT AGENDA MOTION: Council Member Dankwerth MOVED to APPROVE the Consent Agenda as presented. Council Member Gillaspie SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 7—0. A. Minutes — 12/01/04 01/05/05 Minutes,Town Council Regular Session 3 B. Resolution No. (R)05-01 Authorizing the Oro Valley Police Department to Oversight accept the Council on Driving or Operating Under the Influence Abatement Grant Funds top urchase Audio/Video Recording Systems and Lighting Systems for the DUI Units in the amount of$14,954.00 g g 14. PRESENTATION OF TRAINING GRANT AWARD BY THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE TO VENTANA MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC Economic Development Administrator Jeff Weir reported that the Arizona Department of Commerce has awarded Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. (VMSI) a Job Training Program grant in the amount of$443,248. He explained that VMSI must match the grant amount and the monies would be applied to assist existing employees in a e y s plishing training "mss 1t and skill enhancements necessary to retain their jobs. Mr• Weir,,,/ introduced Arizona Department of Commerce Deputy Director Joe Yuhas. ::y • X�: F `''` presented ! and Ma ��' orris Mr. Yuhas, Senator Pete Hershberger, Senator Toni He$ ,, x .r, fir,;. �y'r. i� 'i$' 'f�'.,'/.�.'� X.•:}iy:i:i}}fir. Wri, '."offs�i:"'G y4:✓..the Job Trainin Program grant check to Mr. RoHuman Re � s Director for VMSI. ;00/ 1,04: .:.,! . r,•!4�.„fix//,>,r :%y: . Wc4 Mayor Loomis thanked all those .responsible and co ated Ventana Medical Systems, Inc is;N, "%Mx "'.>.y, • A• ;."� .S N RACE DIRECTOR, ok 3. PRESENTATION FROM TU • 1J;` J r ,r�J,:r: rr r RELAY .��' ��THON AND PAM REED, CONCERNING THE R f4 `,` (Ms Reed was not presen e Co on the Marathon. This item will be moved to a future agen• II, r `wrfr i" :, rJ`,v/J '"ro:"%�r 1. � �•r•^, ' .+i/M .: .:?;�4 o..r/'��` �'"'•,'.h lir. ! Yr�'41:f /ir: '"r.5't}y ��' ICODR. A JY 4. PRESENT 4, :fliNE MARIE McCARTEN, PRESIDEN 71 CONCERNI ;, r : ;. O :::.v ITY COLLEGE; NORTHWEST CAMPUS f, }%7/r:`•r rf rif/:tii/r f' Dr. Anne "? -``z cCarte .:esident of the Northwest Campus of Pima Community iyM.. Powe{ nt presentation on the Northwest Campus. She detailed the College, rev -�"� 7,�i campus servicesf ? $1:51.`ture highlights of the campus and explained that enrollment was at 82,000 cre e ,;:t .-: non-credit) students. She further asked what the College could further do to serve Orb Valley and offered to take the council members on a tour of the campus. 2. ELECTION OF VICE MAYOR Council Member Culver NOMINATED Council Member Gillaspie for the position of Vice Mayor. Council Member Dankwerth SECONDED the nomination. (No further nominations were presented.) MOTION: Council Member Culver MOVED to ELECT Council Member Gillaspie to serve as Vice Mayor from January 5th through December 31, 2005. Council Member Dankwerth SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 7—0. 01/05/05 Minutes,Town Council Regular Session 4 5. SELECTION OF COUNCIL MEMBER TO SERVE ON THE INTERVIEW PANEL FOR THE ORO VALLEY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Town Manager Chuck Sweet explained that on December 15, 2004, the Town Council passed Ordinance (0)04-45 authorizing the establishment of the Oro Valley Historic Preservation Commission. The Ordinance included the establishment of an interview panel which was to include a member of the Town Council, the Town Historian and the Community Development Director. MOTION: Council Member Dankwerth MOVED to APPOINT Council Member Culver to serve on the interview panel for the Oro Valley citizens' interested in serving on the Oro Valley Historic Preservation Commission. Council Member PA:1,11 SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 7— 0. 4,wvf :lfy 6. DISCUSSION AND/OR POSSIBLE ACTION '41,,e'", of rfY/ � :y. THE ADDITION OF A PARKS AND RECREATION A PAA, OR Y :' r,.1 MEMBER TO SERVE ON THE INITIAL INTERVIEW P 4 • "f FOR THE (WAVALLEY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSIO %`f,` .r .yam� /4t, NA,010':* ?.iTown Manager Chuck Sweet explained that on Dece ff ", 5, 2004, the Town Council passed Ordinance (0)04-45 authorizing/. - 11,- ,. 6' �: e Oro Valley Historic Preservation Commission. He ex laine a .b.�;� s y,;a uent teltde' December 15th meeting, a p flay g, request from Council Members Parish an P . 1 a 0: 4ry �r. ought forward to consider addinga Parks and Recreation Advisory : +7> .t r: 4 . .ember to 1 �. also serve on the interview panel. leCatir At"'".". Yi7;::r. cej :S'!•i� Discussion followed rea ' • �%'" i f';in'%r g ' ".; � 1;V-interview panel members (includinga • The original Ori y��- v��,�,�.�� :,�� Ly-%, member of ' B) P:Vit, embers (not including a member of PRAB.) (CM. 'rz'rry'%%xi;...♦.vim j" r1J�r`if'�,.. .rj_?'?�// ''. • BeiF .lFovl mp1441-`'iwitg'W•,cel •!• ncil Policy regarding the Interview Committee for To �:' �.oards an , mmissions consisting of one Council member, the Chair of -rethe B � .,f, Corn �Ati,� ion and a staff member(over the specific department.) (C.M. f • • No intent ti` 5� nyy one out" only an effort to comply with Policy. (C.M. Culver) • Discussion and debate on issues regarding the adoption of Ordinance (0)04-45 took place on December 15th. (Mayor Loomis) Mayor Loomis opened the floor for public comment. Tom Honebrink, Chair of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, stated that the recommendation from PRAB to Council had been that there be a relationship between the Historic Preservation Commission and PRAB as it applies to the establishment of the Commission and as to how PRAB would be involved in the interviewing of the candidates of the Commission. He stated that once the Historic Preservation Commission was formed and in place, PRAB would "step back". He also explained that they had recommended that liaisons from PRAB to the Commission (and the Commission to 01/05/05 Minutes,Town Council Regular Session 5 PRAB) be assigned and both liaisons would be without voting privileges. In response to a question from Mayor Loomis, Mr. Honebrink stated that the liaisons would serve as the Council and/or Chair saw fit. However, he expected that they would give input on "related issues"but they would be non-voting liaisons. MOTION: Vice Mayor Gillaspie MOVED to add a Parks and Recreation Advisory Board member to the Historic Preservation Commission interview panel. Council Member Abbott SECONDED the motion. Discussion followed regarding: • Commend PRAB for their work. (C.M. Abbott) ■ Good solution to propose the"no vote" liaison. (C.M. Abb o �3 A, ,f communications between Boards/Commiss'. $ '"`V.M. Gillaspie) • Foster good u Counc' • Subsequent action can take place to readdress �� K,��6F�r.on how •appointments are made to Boards and Commission-: o : 4 At esires. (Mayor 4 pp .x: ' Abbott.) �� f"'r.::•n•.•r'ri..,.;; Loomis in response to C.M. ` ! %•••, �;fir��r,.rl!,,��,�/•?: • See PRAB and the Historic Preservation Co fir" ion"dovetai < ¢.5%y n issues in the future but expressed concerns regardi � � ; ing 4 N.� cedent wh re one citizen p � r advisoryboard selects members for anoth=` ir, visory board. (C.M. Culver) "'`" r • • Have a Joint Study Session with : ; : and the • .•c Preservation Commission to establish a work plan. (C.M. :5 "{ ■ Apologize that PRAB was ongin:f f�•r"r rcu •4g14, nterview Panel for the Historic Preservation Commission. 0,1:1,!17'o'W politics involved in the Historical Preservatio' s issioViAl3RAB. (C.M. Parish) `` ,.. %r ,endent committees and commissions. • This would set a p i een��• ��; -n ��'N�r� ��"ident p� �.e,brintf i•rward a plan for the Historic PRAB was task �. .� � 9 >,• as completed byPRAB who identified that Preservation Co `� •r `� p • 'tte:�=°�r: id act ince endentl Bringing these two groups these two c i :;,, p Y g to ethe coy this. (Mayor Loomis) :r.r'y"v!.f•r�;:::�iil:iP/i : ,j�.kfcrlrY.✓w•`/.N < MOTION f6C, ' 'Vfe, / .'. EID 4—. ith Mayor Loomis and Council Members Culver and D ankw erth o "" , • Mayor Loomis rec-•<4;:it : e meeting at 7:50 p.m. The meeting resumed at 8:00 p.m. 7. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING—ORDINANCE NO. (0)04-13 REQUESTS APPROVAL OF A REZONING FROM R1-144 (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO C-2 (COMMERCIAL DISTRICT) FOR A SITE COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE ORIGINAL STEAM PUMP RANCH, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ORACLE ROAD (DIRECTLY ACROSS FROM EAST HANLEY BOULEVARD AND THE FOOTHILLS BUSINESS PARK)—NORTH OF THE HOME DEPOT SITE AND SOUTH OF THE PROPOSED STEAM PUMP VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT, PARCEL NOS. 220-08- OO1C, 220-08-001F, 220-08-001F, 220-08-001G, 220-08-001K, AND 220-08-002A Community Development ment Director Brent Sinclair reviewed an aerial photo of the site. He then explained that on February 3, 2004, the Planning and Zoning Commission 01/05/05 Minutes,Town Council Regular Session 6 recommended denial of the rezoning of the original Steam Pump Ranch site. Since that time, the applicant, the applicant's design team, Town staff, Pima County's Cultural and Historic design team and State advisors have met to work on a tentative development plan that would protect the historic site and yet make it amenable to the surrounding properties. Mr. Sinclair stated that progress has been made and a concept plan has been agreed upon; however, the revised concept plan is very different than the original application. Therefore, staff is recommending that Council deny the application as it stands and then the applicant can begin a new process (apply for a Planned Area Development (PAD) zoning or become an extension of the Steam Pump PAD.) In response to a question from Mayor Loomis, Michael Naifeh, 2863 N. Calle Ladera, applicant, stated that he understood that if the item was not approv=.:rx y the Council, it would then be up to the Planning and Zoning Commission as to:i,: ?.- er it could be brought forward again in the next year. `' ':. �"v;�Y/it/%�"• 1r �r f.e; %f�''•; '%r�is y�.Vii,: �,i' ,; y kbli Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. There bein: peaers,-,: c hearing 5vvfwas closed ;pap- ;#4;:r rf MOTION: Council Member Abbott MOVED to yy,' .• "• }�:-,• Ordinance No (0)04-13given the comments from Mr. Sinclair ant :'on the actions bythe Planning rr • r D the motion• and Zoning Commission. Council Mem►: �;;.:.ulver SE � ��! M frii ri`i:lY: i`l jiy{/ lyy,..W01%.•:.:. �mvIn response to a question from Mayor Lo r�! �: - nying the request verses "tabling it indefinitely", Acting Town Att ,attiri-J41 es stated that there were no legal issues to be concerned •'"�{!r'.,.�.�: ' A°,77-'7,V;7%, yqf AMENDMENT �n/ `��"� T O T • oun ember Parish asked to add wording to •�` `--/y/; � X `the Motion thatThe CoC ��€t�% y � � mrti .•t the Planningand Zoning Commission look at the item fa ,.bl i =:' em is resubmitted•" Council Members Abbott and Culver agreeda 4',r /moi h 4 •m i-1"of!!+ Vice Mayte•.iaspie sug..//ri�'rrrrli!.P^:r•.: y- d that the criteria that the Council is looking for be referenced (b..q521,!‘n the f-yN) gs from the Planning Commission.) He stated that this would ve ithe . g , � ,*-4triv e direction if he does bring the item back. Council Member Cul commented that the new proposed conceptp lan seems to be consistent with the vision for Steam Pump Ranch. She stated that she hopes that those designs continue to move forward whether the property is brought back as part of the Steam Pump PAD or whether it is brought forward as a new application. She stated that she felt that there was a good working plan and substantial progress has been made. AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION: Vice Mayor Gillaspie asked to amend the motion and include the wording "If the item is resubmitted, it must address Items 1 —6 of the Planning and Zoning Commissions factors for recommended denial." Council Members Abbott and Culver agreed to the amendment. MOTION AS AMENDED, carried, 7 —0. 01/05/05 Minutes,Town Council Regular Session 7 8. PUBLIC HEARING- ORDINANCE NO. (0)05-01 EXEMPTING RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 3 FROM PORTIONS OF THE RANCHO VISTOSO PAD SIGN REQUIREMENTS AND TO BE REGULATED UNDER THE ORO VALLEY ZONING CODE REVISED, CHAPTER 12, SIGNS, LOCATED WITHIN THE RANCHO VISTOSO PAD,BORDERED BY TANGERINE ROAD, ORACLE ROAD, RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD AND BIG WASH, PARCELS 219-20-8280, 219-20-8270, 223-02-023A, AND 223-02-021A Community Development ment Director Brent Sinclair reviewed an overhead map of Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 3 and explained that the request for exemption from the Rancho g Vistoso Planned Area Development (PAD) sign requirements is for Neighborhood 3 only. Dick Maes, 945 W. Vistoso Highlands, representing Vistoso.. .`7 ./, stated that they are g p 000 j/yam.f requesting a modification to the monument signage at the % £� e Industrial Park q � n �.�� ary��; ould be �`�'� � design alongInnovation Park Drive. He explained that the si• -x:'-- '''y ex (verses concave design) and made from the Rancho r '�•:';f¢i so stone for c��.f. ? ity. He ��mss.. ,gr further explained that in order to add a"high tec 'riff"t: 'r gnage (at Ce re uest of p g to t� g gq . the tenants of the Industrial Park, they are propo a rusted steel plate in the • 'WOW`fix,. center of the signs and usingbrushed aluminum lette F e further explained that there r�f� would be a total of four (4) signs, two at..' � : o Vistos ;, evard/Innovation Park Drive and two at Tangerine Road/Irmo 3 ! •ve• ;/.''` : s9 �dv..i'r l x''J'•e %�:. !. `^'..:%'�1l•//'..'CGf'/fir..`�''h' .//ifiCgJyp %;C;rf4'� /rf yn/lrr"•.•.r,.: r"/•J'•r-: /iice:%Y ,!r> h'!/:..,r//i>' Territorial Signs, reviewed an ,�.`p"�k r= ' tation of the proposed signage. Bill Fields, Tetir , p'>c.i°/''�.yip-'i:' Mr• Sinclair reviewed: ,.¢"rr - ♦!♦!♦!��'I��.�/i! % " Factors for the a 1• �� iy' • Convex shape,b . y g � , a t=rs and rust-colored panel provide a unique r+"`4 � 110 Vi form of si• !. •e for Innovation Park Drive. • The b "" u '` d match Ventana Medical and Integrated �% '' i-'��•' � ., Bio ,y% .ri. � - y ,: lesi• ¢ / %J.G. • Th ' l u:. cant wo / •ntinue to use the Rancho Vistoso stone, creating a degree 1,�J•'z z Rancho Vistoso PAD ��' ` ' ��"�5 -st of the of ha x.�y `•.,.� with t x • "Existin Di ithin Neighborhoodhborhood 3 support the amendment. : ' • The Develoeview Board recommends approval. Factors against the application: • The recommended increased size presents a lack of compatibility with signage in the surrounding areas and signage within Innovation Park Drive (Addressed in Exhibit"A") In response to questions from Mayor Loomis, Mr. Sinclair explained that this is not a PAD amendment; it is an exemption from the PAD's sign requirements. He also confirmed that this request is a special case for these particular monument signs in this particular Neighborhood. p Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. There being no speakers, the public hearing y was closed. 01/05/05 Minutes,Town Council Regular Session 8 MOTION: Council Member Parish MOVED to ADOPT Ordinance (0)05-01, OV3-04- 11, PAD Exemption for Rancho Vistoso Innovation Park Drive, with the condition listed in Exhibit in"A." EXHIBIT "A" 1. The size of monument signs is subject to the Rancho Vistoso PAD requirements. MOTION SECONDED by Council Member Dankwerth. In response to a question from Mayor Loomis, Mr. Maes verified that the request is only for four signs at Innovation Park Drive (2 at the north end at Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and 2 at the south end at Tangerine Road.) ;f after MOTION CARRIED, 7 —0. �/`j•• r l'414:5‘- 9. 4:"mac;9. PUBLIC HEARING—ORDINANCE NO. (0 ; .-12 AD G THE EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN IN ORDS PARTICI ' :40 IN THE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ASSISTAN ' • {.. 'ROGRA • AND D �• ice.- REPEALING ALL RESOLUTIONS, ORDIN•:r ;:: .%.,,. .t":� :�D RULES OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY IN CONFLICT TH , •x.� TH• PRESERVING THE RIGHTS AND DUTIES THAT HAVF �, 'EADY ;a " fH RED AND PROCEEDINGS THAT HAVE ALRmittrf•.,;, UN EUNDER AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY TO d ` " „Nmi,i ¢r'..rte•,,%: iv. >• r Police Chief Danny Sharp st. "� $ ' I,,:, Ordinance (0)05-02 would u date the "�� .adopt� ��..� � Town's Emergency Opera,,:. z4v ,s: d wo ��ring the Town in compliance with Pima ..:•��that �� . Fe. :1 requirement and would also allow the County's plan. He exp ��;��a :��:. �;s,, •'�',�•�...i.,.`iri;,� �f Town to take advantage""��-0), f�� : °�:. 2. should a disaster occur. Chief Sharp d �� further explained t 'imaF provided ' p s", �., the Police Department with $10,000 for a y` F owns Plan. Adoption of the Plan would then allow consultant to r- :��, �;�,y��.��?..�da �� own's Police 130,441m''' . �s`f.i' ent 4 for Rti . onies back. In response t: ,stion y>6 �- V• 1:6‘ ice Mayor Gillaspie, Chief Sharp explained that Town departments do��" y�y;�;• S�r&r•� ' p ,r s_;:i. ents in different areas. He explained that this is Phase I of •the ultimate plan, ,',M,ase II being to train staff and Phase III would be to exercise the actual Plan so that ev= one would feel comfortable in their roles and responsibilities. In response to a question from Mayor Loomis, Chief Sharp explained that it is recommended that the Ordinance be adopted with an emergency clause because Pima County is trying to close out their books and the Town wants to make sure that monies are distributed back to the Town before that occurs. In response to a question from Council Member Abbott, Chief Sharp explained that organizational charts exist at the State level and he would have an Officer check into getting copies. Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing. There being no speakers, the public hearing was closed. 01/05/05 Minutes,Town Council Regular Session 9 MOTION: Council Member Abbott MOVED to ADOPT Ordinance (0)05-02, adopting the Emergency Operations Plan in order to participate in the Emergency Management g Y p Assistance Grant Program and declaring an emergency to exist. Council Member Carter SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 7 —0. 10. PUBLIC HEARING—ORDINANCE NO. (0)05-03 RECREATIONAL AREA IN-LIEU FEE PROPOSAL FOR THE UPLANDS AT LAMBERT LANE SUBDIVISION, LOCATED 1/8 MILE WEST FROM THE INTERSECTION OF LA CANADA DRIVE AND LAMBERT LANE WITHIN THE EL CONQUISTADOR PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT, PARCEL 224-24-1570 Community Development Director Brent Sinclair reported that `- al plat was Lambert Lane subdivision bythe � N� Council on approved for the Uplands at ,�� condition of the f��y` 1. �-,.�•1�.that an in-lieu fee December 15, 2004. He explained that a o ! f p %7 `�� '��'! ordation of the bythe Town,,,,14 ncil rio '. . s �. proposal for this subdivision be approved .' p ria used when .,'x s denng plat. Mr. Sinclair then reviewed the evaluatio ,!`�AP" -#*"` , '." g °at b•- on thea aisal report of alternative recreational area proposal. He explai p p p pp p ��• �p"� � -��e proposed in-lieu amount the property and the formula used to determine in g ,;„ ,f,f,. nriPtP. for the recreation area is $33,100• He stated that the-ttilKosies would be used for the West Lambert Lane Park / ff�� `� " '"y�� ce Director David Andrews In response to a question from Vice Ma . ,...rw "�"may"` stated that the in-lieu fees are accounted f• , 4 , ,��" 1 ar eine item in the Budget. if'<>•!.u:li,:r;%ye,..: Fri%.l'Nb::!'• Mayor Loomis opened the fr, ..;v4n o fi' a• ' :.:. ��J��J,,�� diftW 4w, Bill Adler, 10720 N. Ea_`h CC - i aLrff " at he has always been opposed to in-lieu formula a ron ould never create enough money to approach what fees as the o _ r ,,, ? `'' !� N.m rove it with the necessary amenities. He stated would be requ .:��y�;�' :.�� v n� ��..��; mprove : �' � whether the that it was " . din . .inu .cce t in-lieu fees and he questioned monies ha°ftet all bee . aside or mixed with General Revenues. He stated that the tok,,in-lieu fee fo TakijneedetAose substantially revised as it was inadequate and wrong. "Oir Mayor Loomis clo''`<r' public hearing. gy4x In response to a question from Council Member Dankwerth, Mr. Andrews further explained that they account for in-lieu fees in the General Fund with a segregated account code. He explained that they have not been ear-marked for any specific purpose in the Budget. Council Member Parish commented that there were problems with the in-lieu fee formulas and the Zoning Code needed to be addressed. However, this request should be approved as that is how it is currently set up. MOTION: Council Member Parish MOVED to APPROVE Ordinance (0)05-03, recreation area in-lieu fee proposal in the amount of$33,100 for Uplands at Lambert Lane subject to the condition listed in Exhibit"A." 01/05/05 Minutes,Town Council Regular Session 10 EXHIBIT A: 1) The $33,100 in lieu fee must be submitted prior to the release of more than five lots. Council Member Abbott SECONDED the motion. Council Member Abbott commented that she agreed with Council Member Parish and stated that she would also be requesting that these items be addressed at a future meeting. MOTION CARRIED, 7 -0. 11. PUBLIC HEARING-ORDINANCE NO. (0)05-04 R ,Corr. TING TO THE PRIVILEGE LICENSE TAX; ADOPTING "THE 2002 A ENTS TO THE rtv TAX CODE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY" BY ' � ".... NCE• PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDI IES FOR VIOLATIONS Finance Director David Andrews explained that 47,P,:zz n ;,po �,�, es and to s that Impose local sales tax have ado ted the Model Cities Tax�' l - „ . p � ,41V-tated that adoption of -1,09 Ordinance (0)05-04 would incorporate tax code am si is into the Town Code as proposed by the League of Arizona Citie,A-1,I,4 Towns f, . vir lfYlf��lfr•i/"j1¢'f%':}rrfi .f* . Mayor Loomis opened the public hearin:r• f er� �A::: } K �peakers, the public hearing 9 y 7 •%6{.'.,li/� J�f�'%i. air., was closed %/`" ,. • �'i.'•Y4vrte N li•,:nki ..•mss,'", 011,464, '"moi'10 MOTION: Council Me �:�w ,- a f ..":rth M . / D to ADOPT Ordinance (0)05-04, adopting the "2002 A t,1Wents r s ax e:.e of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona. gue ; � 'ion• Motion carne Council Member Culver••401:131,41. � � � 4�ys�.-:�� d 7-0. 'r(�•:;1:li moi.:?' ;!,•^' .,/,.f,�f7 /f "1444:- /� i// '`ter•. 12. CONS . �, � :2 � �. N . . 1 v,,O R POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING TOWN COUNCILOW', Y,. SO "- G � TS TO BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, ... AND OUTSID 6 . NCIES J• Mayor Loomis G=` 1,'s�- t the last liaison y , v.,,::r, assignments were for a two-month period ' .,rx a'`onths and it has now bee - ;- :; Fy • Discussion followed regarding the Council members' interests and desires for liaison assignments and possibly sharing liaison responsibilities. MOTION: Vice Mayor Gillaspie MOVED to approve the following list of assignments effective January 5, 2005 through January 4, 2006: Planning and Zoning Commission Barry Gillaspie Development Review Board Conny Culver Parks & Recreation Advisory Board Terry Parish Budget & Bond Committee Helen Dankwerth Water Utility Commission Paul Loomis Police Department Terry Parish 01/05/05 Minutes,Town Council Regular Session 11 MTCVB K. C. Carter GTEC Paul Loomis GTEC Alternate K. C. Carter Chamber of NW Pima County Conny Culver Legislative Liaison Helen Dankwerth Pima Assn. of Governments Paul Loomis Pima Assn. of Governments Alternate Barry Gillaspie Amphitheater School Dist. Liaison Paula Abbott Historic Commission Conny Culver Council Member Culver SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 7—0. 13 FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Atz,, '��yf y •� � $�� hanges to the Discussion followed regarding a dedicated account for in-i!•, ee r . fees. 713V!,', ZoningCode regarding in-lieu ��{{4 r�� to . �°` de a memo'andum giving Mayor Loomis asked Finance Director David Ane' s : •¢. • (�� +��"l��f llected to date and asked the Council an accountingof the in-lieu fees that 1..a ,.,•v`.: s " f submit thee-.4"' ed form for Future Agenda that Council Members Abbott and Parish ��; �� in-lieu fees in the etc.>> "�� din cha ,� the items that identifies specific actions, ;,, g ; ZoningCode. (Vice Mayor Gillaspie st` , rA� !:.work with Council "19P4r1; 0,Members Abbott and Parish on defining � .. r/�y g in-lieu fees for parks.) 03„pie (These items will come back !` },�•-ment . ture agenda when ready.) �`.'".��;. rte• ,! tFOLLOW THE 14. (ITEM 14 WAS Mt-12'P', D •" V HE AGENDA TO O SNDA ��r` � ,,. �..y CONS `�� , y�f ��"-�• � �.;�:�. ENT AG ) :!. f4 if'r CALL TO A i ,1;x a" gx- ADJOU lay" • AKO!" : `'''`•s made Vice Mayor Gillaspie and SECONDED by MOTION. � � by Council Member •`:1$/ R o adjourn at 8:55 p.m. Motion carried, 7—0. 7� Respectfully submitted, Roxana Garrity, CMC Deputy Town Clerk 01/05/05 Minutes,Town Council Regular Session 12 I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the regular session of the Town of Oro Valley Council of Oro Valley, Arizona held on the day of 2005. I further certify that the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present. Dated this day of ,2005. Kathryn E. Cuvelier, CMC Town Clerk f r• . Agar r.> '�.=fail,✓,•:u' Oa Il�'j ." C4: r Iteror •J lY'%r%�'r%' rr': "Alligke ?r +f.lYn•. dittgW04, itlfr „Air' ait 410f,„ !.,.,N�:_;it"•�c'ri!/r''{%?' t 'C: 401110111r -f:/;"/y�45-10- 41,0*,�;, /f +rr rf�� .X�'ri �" ?l. Ve-f;/-• IN.� MINUTES JOINT STUDY SESSION ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL; PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION; AND GENERAL PLAN UPDATE REVISION COMMITTEE JANUARY 13, 2005 ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE STUDY SESSION: AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER: 6:05 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: TOWN COUNCIL: Paul Loomis, Mayor Barry Gillaspie, Vice M. Paula Abbott, Counci ber K.C. Carter, Counc. -mbe Coney Culver, Cou 4 R r Helen Dankwerth, Co ember Terry Pari •uncil Me PLANNING & ZONING Don Cox, k COMMISSION: John Annie: al cKe- missioner e tany, ♦ issioner Ke .. -d missioner EXCUSED: Manross, Commissioner GENERA N 20 r UPDATE I l SION COMMITT :ill Adler Teree Bergman Carl Boswell Don Chatfield Robert Delaney Carl Kuehn Melanie Larson Doug McKee Rosalie Roszak Pat Spoerl Ed Taczanowsky PRESENTATION OF REVISED GENERAL PLAN UPDATE Community Development Director Brent Sinclair reviewed the background of the status of the General Plan and reviewed the timeline necessary to re-submit the General Plan back to the voters by November 2005. Mr. Sinclair reviewed the following amendments AIN recommended by the General Plan 2004 Update Revision Committee: 01/13/05 Minutes,Joint Town Council,P&Z Commission& 2 General Plan 2004 Update Revision Committee • PROPOSED ITEM ADDRESSED AMENDMENTS PER COUNCIL MINUTES DATED 09/20/04) Page 10 Major Amendment Issue Item A Page 11 Minor Amendment Page 11 Table 1: Matrix Page 13 Adoption of Amendment Issue Item A & B (Four Findings of Fact) Page 16 Paragraph entitled Goal Issue Item C Paragraph entitled Policy Discussion followed regarding the word"portion" and wh. -ig • id be given to it. (Listed on page 13) of the General Plan Document, an. I, the Ge 'lan is "general" in nature. Therefore, each development w' looked at in • t the time it is submitted and then mitigate any issues at that t' Discussion followed regarding whenever there is an sion, always review the "Community Values" listed at the begi •f the Gen. • an Policy Document. The P & Z Commission's task and the Tow sk wi evaluating theapplicant's • interpretation of how they have met this t a`. •ey have come to define that criteria. In response to a question . e or Gil 'e, Mr. Sinclair explained that the market demand is vague in to ► its s.• but clear in its intent, which is "show me market wise, why there i •- r community." Don Chatfield - si: • him that either by procedure or amendment of the Zoning Cod rezoni •mi equirements, the Town could require standard market an. etrics th taff could double-check. Discussion folio -s g market demand and how this is accepted bythe p community; how `ond use is forecasted and asking for detail of theJ ro'ect during g a General Plan Amend ent is not appropriate. Mr. Sinclair stated that the reason language was added regarding subsequent zoning and development processes was to show that it is not part of the General Plan process, but that it is a subsequent process. He stated that there will be a means of mitigation while the applicant goes through the process. Mayor Loomis pointed out that no matter how specific the Town tries to make the Plan, someone will always criticize the Four Findings of Fact and will always have a different • interpretation of those Facts. 01/13/05 Minutes,Joint Town Council,P&Z Commission& 3 General Plan 2004 Update Revision Committee Bill Adler stated it is imperative that issues be confronted at the earliest possible stage and that the applicant is entitled to know what he is up against and that he will be expected to address those concerns throughout the entire process. PROPOSED ITEM ADDRESSED AMENDMENTS PER COUNCIL MINUTES DATED 09/20/04) Page 19 Land Use(Annexation) Issue Item J Page 20 Community Identity Issue Item J Development Diversity Page 21 General Land Use Issue Item D & . Land Use & Air Quality Page 22 Policies • will be added to Land U• tion 21 in Str. g help define transfer of Imp • tati• an Densities Page 25 Significant Resource Are. sue Item 'Awl Page 26 Delete Back-Up Designat )11p, Mayor Loomis asked if ubli• d sch ould be added under emergency Y p service uses (page 23). 40.0 In response to a q spie s ie regarding cluster development, Mr. Sinclair stated that t ter •` •ment does work in an effort to save desert vegetation. Where develo• are 'tted, clustering is encouraged so that more I passageway- •e o dangered species and wildlife. gewa Y p p • an g Mr. Chatfiel• that t F ustering gives the Town a tool to protect sensitive environmental a d h it will have to be balanced against neighborhood s: g concerns, the Com elt it was important to give that option. John Aiming stated that the Town can encourage Neighborhood Commercial Development, but that Town cannot ensure it (page 21). Melanie Larson pointed out that there are some uses of"shall" and asked for a legal opinion on some of the uses of"shall"that may not work. Mayor Loomis called a recess at 7:30 p.m. Meeting resumed at 7:40 p.m. 01/13/05 Minutes,Joint Town Council,P&Z Commission& 4 General Plan 2004 Update Revision Committee • PROPOSED ITEM ADDRESSED AMENDMENTS PER COUNCIL MINUTES DATED 09/20/04) Page 33 Community Design No changes Page 37 Revenue Generation Property taxes has been deleted Page 38 Economic Sustainability Property taxes has been deleted 3.1.9 —new statement added Regarding annexation Discussion followed regarding "adequate notice" for pre-annex. a reements, the g State Law requirements, the public process and logistics of a' tns andp re.- annexation agreements. It was pointed out that State Law r e .nn.exation public hearing before the Town Council. Current Town polic quires an . •nal public hearing before the Planning & Zoning Commission o public hea .efore the Town Council. Discussion followed concerning adding a submittal • e prior to the annexation deadline for all pre-annexation agreeme 41111 It was suggested that possibly the follow ..en - . be deleted "There will be a PROPOSED M ADDRESSED AMENDMENTS COUNCIL MINUTES ATED 09/20/04) Page 37 Issue Item P Page 38 Issue Items L, M, P Page 40 of De pment Issue N Discussion followe ding the last sentence of 4.1.3 under Fair Share Allocation of Costs. It was decide. at the last sentence of 4.1.3 "The Town reasonably wishes to be satisfied that sufficient demand exists before authorizing a higher land use intensity than present zoning permits" should be identified as a new separate Item 4.1.10 under Fair Share Allocation of Costs. 01/13/05 Minutes,Joint Town Council,P&Z Commission& 5 General Plan 2004 Update Revision Committee PROPOSED ITEM ADDRESSED AMENDMENTS PER COUNCIL MINUTES DATED 09/20/04 Page 58 Range of Opportunity 7.2.3 master planned communities Page 71 Open Space &Natural Issue Item J Resources Conservation Page 87 Glossary Items C & H Page 88 Glossary Added definition"Trade" Mr. Sinclair stated that this document does not yet refl-, e"shall 'ents" He stated that since some of the"shall statements" wer- out at the P • nd Council the 2020 Update Committee decided that . • .tem,= hat has "s'.11" in it as level, p . originally recommended bythe General Plan Stee R ttee shall be retained. g Y Mr. Sinclair stated that the two remainin al s for dis I include the Land Use Planning Map and the Strategic Implem • am. '41/ PRESENTATION OF GENERAL PLA RTICIPATION INFORMATION AND ED INP r Public Information Off• •ob ,► ated t on November 17, 2004 the Council directed staffto developation and education plan enlisting the .. advice of staff, Re '•n Co ee members and Town Council. Because of the magnitude oft►' to 4:: _ed the services of an outside professional consulting firm to orga► .nd as to o a d eas into a workable coordinated plan. Zimmerman and Assoc as the co tant chosen since they have significant expertise with public educa d ballo oposition elections in this region. The Public Participation, Information an• an developed by Zimmerman& Associates is in y d addresses actions that are necessary from now until the comprehensive election. Overall, the . an contains many different types of actions that will require hands onartici ation from designated staff, Mayor and Council, ex-Revision Committee p p members and community leaders. This plan is designed for the use of the Town, its staff and its volunteers. It is not a plan for an Independent Expenditure Committee or a Political Action Committee, although such a group may be organized outside the auspices of the Town. Key decision points are: • All mail-in ballot. • The decision to conduct the election via an all-mail ballot has fiscal implications .411) as well as timing issues. The cost is more, however, greater voter participation is 01/13/05 Minutes,Joint Town Council,P&Z Commission& 6 General Plan 2004 Update Revision Committee • assured. Since ballots are actually sent to voters a month in advance of the election date, information and education efforts must be planned accordingly. • Use of consulting services. • The scope of this plan is much broader than can be accomplished by existing staff resources. Therefore, it is recommended to enlist the services of a professional communication/education firm to assist the Town in the implementation of the Plan. Consulting services would include designing and packaging informational/educational fliers, telephone information campaigns, display advertising campaign,press kits, leadership meetings and other activities to reach the greatest number of likely voters. Carol and Pete Zimmerman, Zimmerman & Associates reviewed t Public Information and Education Plan for the General Plan to be submitted to the l on November 1, 2005 and discussion followed regarding: • Additional public participation opportunities in the o I Houses and Public Hearings. • Active public information efforts using diff- ed'a, meetings ilers and the Internet. • Ongoing public education and information with communitygroups, s p , leaders and citizens. • Communications Objective. • Key Audiences—voters, news m *-ss c. munity. • Creative Development & Position • Communications Obje • Key Audiences—v• medi.t ' business community. • Strategies and ge- gui. es for t, evelopment of educational materials. • Trust in Gove s eath the surface in every election and in every community. Genera an Review Committee nears the completion of its to n .lore other opportunities to deal with issues such as "trus • el in -d. Mayor Loo ed that 'ublic Participation Plan and the funds allocated should be brought forwar o action. Mayor Loomis calle. recess at 9:00 p.m., meeting resumed at 9:10 p.m. Mr. Sinclair stated that the General Plan Committee recommended removing the La Cholla/Tangerine Growth Area from the land use map. He also stated that the Committee voted unanimously to keep the 1996 General Plan Land Use Designations on the three properties that were not considered by the Steering Committee,but were later changed by the Town Council. Mr. Sinclair and Mr. Nodine reviewed the revised Land Use Map showing the nine areas affected by the Revision Committee as listed on page 31 of the General Plan Document. Mr. Nodine pointed out that all back-up designations have been removed since the State of Arizona does not acknowledge back-up designations. 7 01/13/05 Minutes,Joint Town Council,P&Z Commission& General Plan 2004 Update Revision Committee /SS Mayor Loomis asked that the Town Council minutes where the three properties - Maps 6, Y 8 & 9 were discussed and chanes voted on by the Town Council be provided to the P & hang es Commission and the Town Council. Discussion followed regarding the importance of maintaining the public trust and g followin the recommendation of the General Plan Update Committee that the process g for an chap es to land use designations must go through the Steering Committee, Y g Plannin & ZoningCommission and the Town Council. It was pointed out that the g workin committee evaluated the land uses in their entire context of how they were g a lied at the time, not by a specific parcel. Vice Mayor Gillaspie suggested that one pp solution to think about regarding Steam Pump, would be that the cil could approve the recommendations on the land use designations with one exc= to Steam Pump that the intention of movin this area forward as a potential .ite. g followed re ardin the term "Complimenta se Dist ed to the Discussion o g g Im lementation Plan in lace of MUN and oncern with • .onfusion Strategicp p and disapproval of MUN at the last election. It w pial hat this Di rict was added pp because there is a need for uses that are complim- e not too dissimilar from Task. one is to define and develop. the C• I entary Use District in the each other. It was onted out that agood C entary ' trict can provide protection future. p g to neighborhoods and is a tool needed + th. Iiii..._ Mayor Loomis summarized the outstanAIN di Y • Definition for"portly • Public Services i e aragr. ' .5.4 wording issues. • Page 38 —loo equ. - ' - or pre-annexation agreements. g • page 40—add n- 1 • Identi k a -w "shall" statements that have been restored. fy • Haw- those issues to the P & Z Commission and ask for - to hem . d make their recommendations to the Town Council. th Zto • M• Docum 'nto the 60 day review period. • ene an Revision Committee of upcoming meetings, may not be Noti joint me provide input. • Send copies changes to the General Plan Revision Committee. any g • Anychange from todayforward—receive the document so that any changes are g all "transparent." Identify any changes as it moves step by step through the process. • Any revisions from this point on be reflected (color coded) on the website document. • From this point on, new copies of this document with the "shall" statements will be distributed to all on 1-14-05. • The document remains "frozen"until it goes to. Planning & Zoning Commission. 41111N • Once the 60 days is up then the comments get ncorporated into the Document. • P & Z holds their 2 hearings and then sends their recommendations to the Town Council. 01/13/05 Minutes,Joint Town Council,P&Z Commission& 8 General Plan 2004 Update Revision Committee • • Second revision would incorporate all the sixty day comments. Mr. Adler stated that any changes that the P & Z Commission makes needs to be concurred with by the General Plan Update Committee. He suggested that when the Commission is considering the changes, those members of the Committee that are available should jointly sit with the P & Z Commission. He suggested that in an effort to speak with one voice, this Committee needs to be a participant in the process as the Council indicated. ADJOURNMENT Council Member Dankwerth MOVED to ADJOURN the joint stuff ssion at 10:10 p.m. MOTION SECONDED by Council Member Culver. MOTIO ed 7 —0. Respectfully it Kati . 0 1-r, CMC Tow .. TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: February 2, 2005 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: Jim Hossley Department of Public Works Operations Division Manager SUBJECT: Resolution No. (R) 05- 05 , A Resolution of the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, Authorizing The Town to Submit A Prioritized List of Drainage CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT Projects (CIP) to the Pima County Regional Flood Control District. BACKGROUND: Pima County Regional Flood Control District personnel have asked municipal jurisdictions in Pima County to submit proposals and requests for funding of drainage control projects. The District is convening a Capital Improvement Project (CIP) committee to review and prioritize the jurisdictions' submitted drainage and flood control project proposals. The committee will recommend the priority and schedule for funding the projects. I will sit on the CIP committee along with staff members from the other jurisdictions, the flood control district and a member of the Flood Control District Advisory Committee. Public Works staff provided a list of proposed drainage projects for our community to the Stormwater Utility Commission. The list includes projects to solve existing problems as well as projects to prevent future drainage problems. Staff provided the Commission with background information, possible solutions and cost estimates. The Commission then prepared a recommended project priority for the Council's consideration. The projects are listed below in order of their recommended priority: 1. Oro Valley Country Club Estates area. This area has experienced drainage and erosion/sedimentation problems for several decades as no drainage control facilities were constructed with the original subdivision. Therefore drainage flows in the streets and across residential lots. A hydrologic study along with preliminary design plans have been prepared for this project using Pima County Regional Flood Control District funds. Many of the proposed solutions involve the use of property within the Oro Valley Country Club golf course to intercept, divert and infiltrate drainage water that otherwise causes flooding problems to public streets and residential property. Estimated cost for the project- $335,000. 1 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 3 2. Saddle Valley/Logan's Crossing Subdivision. The southern portion of this subdivision is impacted by drainage and sediment flowing off the hillside to the south and over the dirt portion of Linda Vista Boulevard. The sediment and drainage have caused property damage to several homes. The proposed project will control sedimentation/erosion and guide drainage flow to adequately sized drainage channels. Estimated cost for the project- $440,000. 3. Shadow Mountain Estates Subdivision. This subdivision has experienced flooding, erosion and sedimentation problems over the past decades. The subdivision does have existing natural drainage channels with drainage easements. Most of these natural channels are too small to handle large flooding events and will overflow their banks flooding adjacent property. The proposed project will deepen and armor the natural channels to contain flood flows within the channel banks. Estimated cost for the project- $360,000. 4. Lomas de Oro Subdivision. This subdivision was recently annexed into the Town. There is a major wash that flows through the western portion of Lomas de Oro. Erosion and flooding are two problems experienced along this wash. The proposed project will armor the wash bank and, where necessary, raise the banks to prevent over topping. This project will also address sheet flooding that occurs along the northeast side of this subdivision and the southwest portion of the Rancho Feliz Subdivision. Estimated cost for the project- $350,000. 5. Canada del Oro Wash land acquisition/open space. This project is a proposal for the Regional Flood Control District to acquire land west of the La Canada Drive bridge. This land is not protected by a levee and is subject to flooding by the Canada del Oro Wash. No flood protection would be constructed. The land might be used for passive recreation — hiking and equestrian. Estimated cost for the project- unknown. 6. Big Wash detention and recharge basin. This project is a joint proposal with the Department of Public Works and the Oro Valley Water Utility to construct a detention and recharge basin in Big Wash. The exact location has yet to be determined, but will most likely be in the vicinity of the Tangerine Road bridge over Big Wash. The basin would function to minimize peak flood flows on the downstream portion of Big Wash and perhaps benefit the Canada del Oro Wash as well. The proposal will also serve as a pilot project on the feasibility of enhancing recharge to adjacent Oro Valley Water Utility well sites with TOWN OF ORO VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 3 of 3 this type of facility. Estimated cost for the project- $250,000. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution (R) 05 -05 2. Exhibit"A", letter from Stormwater Utility Commission Chair 3. Exhibit"B", location map for proposed projects FISCAL IMPACT: Funding would come from the Pima County Regional Flood Control District. Cost sharing requirements, if any, are unknown at this time. RECOMMENDATIONS: Public Works staff recommends approval of the proposed list of projects as prioritized. SUGGESTED MOTION: The Town Council may wish to consider one of the following motions: I move to adopt Resolution Number (R) 05-05 . /77 ,,C4 William A. Jnsen, P.E., Town Engineer 1 / Chuck Swee , Town Manager RESOLUTION NO. (R)05- 05 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING THE TOWN TO SUBMIT A PRIORITIZED LIST OF DRAINAGE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS (CIP) TO THE PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT the Oro ValleyStormwater Utility Commission has recommended a WHEREAS, prioritizedCapital list of drainage Improvement Projects be submitted to the Pima County Regional Flood Control District, and, WHEREAS, the Town Council deems it necessary, in the interest of providing for the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Oro Valley, to authorize the Town proposed of Oro Valleyto submit drainage Capital Improvement Projects for in consideration bythe Pima County Regional Flood Control District, funding NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA: That, the Town is authorized to submit a prioritized list of drainage Capital Improvement vement Projects recommended by the Stormwater Utility Commission to Regional Pima CountyRe ional Flood Control District. The list of CIP projects prioritized as numbered is: 1. Oro Valley Country Club Estates area 2. Saddle Valley/Logan's Crossing subdivision 3. Shadow Mountain Estates subdivision 4. Lomas de Oro subdivision 5. Flood Plain Acquisition/Open Space — CDO Wash 6. Big Wash Recharge Detention Basin PASSED AND ADOPTED bythe Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 2nd day of February, 2005. Paul H. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Kathryn E. Cuvelier, Town Clerk Tobin Sidles, Acting Town Attorney Date Date ATTACHMENT "A" January 7, 2005 Honorable Mayor Paul Loomis Honorable Members of the Oro Valley Town Council Council Chambers 11000 N. La Canada Boulevard Oro Valley, AZ 85737 Dear Mr. Mayor and Honorable Council Members, The members of the Stormwater Utility Commission (SWUC), met on December 2004 to discuss and prioritize Town of Oro Valley (TOV) Capital Improvement 16, Projects (CIP) for drains e improvements to be submitted to the Pima County Prod g Flood Control District (PCFCD) CIP sub-committee. The TOV CIPs will compete for county funds with CIPs from other municipalities. ' ritized projects based on the following specific criteria: current status of We prioritized the project; potential for property damage or harm to citizens from frequent storm events, year 5 to 10 storm events, and 100 year storm events; potential for linking two or more TOV CIPs; potential for linking TOV projects with Pima County projects; liability to TOV; and community improvement. 1 Based on these criteria, rankings, in order of priority, are: 1. Oro Valley Country Club 2. Saddle Valley/Logan's Crossing subdivision 3. Shadow Mountain Estates subdivision 4. Lomas de Oro subdivision 5. Flood Plain Acquisition/Open Space — CDO Wash 6. Big Wash Recharge Detention Basin Respectfully submitted, Leann O'Brian Chair, Stormwater Utility Commission Copy: Bill Jansen Jim Hossley Rich Hawkinson SWUC Members z F- z z v) D o F- z O 2 Q 1-1-1I-- (./) I-- W w o F.- w w Q p Ua Q H- I U 1 c!) W > (/) w Q --(----\,...\\_\\ .4., . ,-. ,,, 0 ..... -........„..,,c_ ",... .,=..........,.... _ . MN r ,i --i .. li..._ op CO \ N ORACLE RD .,-5``� .. . .a 1 U 04X W p rlirpro.. r. N CI,AR .:. . __ _ , L� ..........__ . ,\ ..{.,.., % • ., ›.. . , , ........./ gAikhi: a) \-----,_,) — k, .... , . 0 . ,., -. E .... 14_,....._......„ 1 \ ..,— ..--n-Til ____ 11110.11111Wim -C Illik --\\ 0114 U CO \ . y. • 4-, I ••, a, 6h - .•.. , < .\ N 1ST AV i N IA: ,‹e.,,-, 1 I ----,—, • •Ha vov , , Njp if*•....;# . I Z 111 0 1-------- I a -: --- OCL),,,- ;�:.a1�.�'�,�.. o -�� f,.r• �� \,, H .„,, I ' (i) IscL.c...,,..... cp 7.1 .�-- HO LLA A z N 1.A CHOLLA BLN LA CH{?Lii 0 : • )_ I .::rI , V 1 css, 0 0 Z 0 _.„,„ u) 0 O >-- LIJ cn W O O --- CC w Q 0 o W w (I) ...-1 z < 0 < 2 0 0 O < 0 1CTOWN OF ORO VALLEY STAFF REPORT TO THE TOWN COUNCIL MEETING DATE: February 2, 2005 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: Robert Conant, Senior Planner SUBJECT: OV12-03-34, WLB GROUP, REPRESENTING STONE CANYON LLC, REQUESTS AN EXTENSION OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR STONE CANYON VII, LOCATED NORTH OF TORTOLITA MOUNTAIN CIRCLE IN RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 11, PARCEL 219-05-011A PORTION BACKGROUND: On June 23, 2004, the Town Council approved the Preliminary Plat for 82 single-family lots on 306.77 acres Per Section 4-312B of the OVZCR preliminary plat are valid for six (6) months from the date of Council approval. This enables the applicant time to create and submit improvement plans and a final plat. Unless this is accomplished by December 23, 2004 the Preliminary Plat will expire. A letter of request for an extension was submitted to the Town on December 21, 2004. Section 4-312B of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised grants the Town Council authority to extend the Preliminary Plat for six month periods not to exceed a total of 18 months. SUMMARY: As specified in the attached letter, the applicant has requested a six (6) month extension of the Preliminary Plat. fhe primary reason stated is for the consultant to complete the Improvement Plans for the project. The improvement plan should be submitted to the Town prior to the February 2 Town Council meeting. FACTORS FOR: 1. Lack of an extension would result in a 3-4 month long reprocessing of the Preliminary Plat by staff and the DRB. 2. All the design issues of the Plat have been resolved and the Improvement Plans will be submitted prior to the Town Council meeting. FACTORS AGAINST: None SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to extend OV 12-03-34, Preliminary Plat for Stone Canyon VII, for . period of six months to June 23, 2005. i\ • cal k)t,(L:" Attachment: Plannl : ail o i, dministrator Letter of Request / i Co uni y D evelo ent Director 1 / A /A1C ua,A f i Town Manager Dec. 21. 2004 3:06PM No. 6076 P. 2 The t/LB Engineering • Planning Surveying •Urban Design ( roupDecember 21, 2004 Landscape Architecture Bob Conant Town of Oro Valley 11,000 N LaCanada Drive Oro Valley AZ 85737 Re: Stone Canyon VII Preliminary Plat Extension OVI 24344 WLB No. 185050 A31 N-0105 Dear Bob: It has come to my attention that the Preliminary Plat for Stone Canyon VII is due to expire on the 23rd of this month. We are currently in the process of finalizing the improvement and grading plans for submittal the first part of January, with the Final Plat to follow a couple of weeks later. At this time, we respectfully request that a 6-month extension be granted for the Preliminary Plat approval and greatly appreciate your consideration of this request If you have any questions, you can reach me at 881-7480. I look forward to hearing from you on this matter_ Sincerely, THE WLB GROUP, INC. Linda Thompson Subdivision Coordinator cc: Dick Maes, Vistoso Partners Charlie Hulsey, WLB Steve°liverio,WLB Engineering • Planning • Surveying • Urban Design • Landscape Architecture Offices located in Tucson, Phoenix, Las Vegas • E-mail: tucsonUwlbgroup.corn 4444 East Broadway • Tucson, Arizona 85711 • (520) 881-7480 • FAX (520) 881-7492 2 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY - STAFF REPORT TO TOWN COUNCIL MEETING DATE: February 2, 2005 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL L M 3I ?&i FROM: David Ronquillo, Planner SUBJECT: ADDENDUM - PUBLIC HEARING: OV8-04-07, THE WLB GROUP, REPRESENTING THE ORO VALLEY COUNTRY CLUB, REQUESTS APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A NEW CLUBHOUSE FACILITY, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF VALLE DEL ORO ROAD AND GREENOCK DRIVE, PARCELS 224-34-1650, 224-35-0810, 820, 830, 350,360, 370 & 910 NEW INFORMATION: Since the completion of the last report, the applicant raised concerns with regards to the verbiage in conditions 1 & 8 of Exhibit A. In an effort to clarify the agreements made between the Developer and the neighbors, the wording of conditions 1 and 8 has been revised accordingly. None of the changes infringe or alter the agreements made at the developer/neighbor meeting on January 18, 2005. Please note, all changes are represented via strikeouts and italics/bold. The attached Exhibit B replaces the previous Exhibit A. Attachment 1. Exhibit B Planni g oniyi dna'nistrator . 4:::>"0"-T _'. S....-. Co nity Deve ment Director / it" ' -'41-",--11, A-.4.... 'Q)Ifi Town Manager F:\OV\OV8\2004\8-04-07\reports\TCCUP.RPT.addendum.doc EXHIBIT B OV8-04-07 OV COUNTRY CLUB 1. Theool water edge will be atleast no closer than 35' from the property line. p g 2. The pool will have no diving boards. 3. Theool equipment area and snack bar will not exceed 14' in height. p q 4. All pool equipment must be fully enclosed within a 5 sided structure. 5. Lighting: • No exterior lights along the north side of the pool equipment structure. • No lights within the pool area above 6' in height—excluding underwater lighting. • All exterior lighting on the north side of the fitness building shall be under canopy. 6. A 6' high screen wall must be positioned to commence at the northwest edge of the pool equipment structure and extendingapproximately 115' parallel with the property line and terminating in proximity to pool of the northeast edge area. From this point, a 3' - 6" high screen wall will curve around the perimeter of the parkingand sidewalk area extending to the northwest corner of the tennis courts (this wall willprovide offsets and an opening for pedestrian connection). The walls will consist of a CMU brick with p a stucco finish and cap accent. The color and texture of the wall will blend in with the existing buildings. 7. The walls as specified in condition#6 must be constructed during Phase 1. 8. A minimum 5' 7' landscape buffer must be maintained A buffer no less than 5'must be provided between the north drainage wall and the existing trees on the south side of the Tearse's property. The north drainage wall ifnecessary must be established in a manner to preserve the existing vegetation. 9. There will be no permanent grill facilities within the snack bar area. 10. No loudspeakers or PA systems within the pool area. 11. Thep ool hours will be limited to 8am-8pm and beyond these hours only lap swimming can occur. F:\OV\OV8\2004\8-04-07\reports\TCCUP.RPT.addendum.doc TOWN OF ORO VALLEY - 2 STAFF REPORT TOWN COUNCIL MEETING DATE: February 2, 2005 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: David Ronquillo, Planner SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE NO. (0) 0 5-08, OV8-04-07, THE WLB GROUP, REPRESENTING THE ORO VALLEY COUNTRY CLUB, REQUESTS APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A NEW CLUBHOUSE FACILITY, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF VALLE DEL ORO ROAD AND GREENOCK DRIVE, PARCELS 224-34-1650, 224-35-0810, 820, 830, 350,360, 370 & 910 NATURE OF THE CUP REQUEST: Per Section 6-102.B.1 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised (OVZCR) the proposed clubhouse facility is allowed subject to a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). The use is categorized under community buildings and recreational facilities. The use permit is reviewed and recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission and is subsequently voted upon by the Town Council. Thep �u ose of the conditional use permit is to assure that the proposed use is compatible with the adjacent properties and the surrounding area. The compliance analysis section of this report describes how the project ddresses pertinent Town Code standards and conditions, which are intended to assure land use compatibility. Once a Conditional Use Permit is approved by the Town Council, the next step in the process involves review of a Development Plan. Generally, a CUP takes approximately 3 months to process and a Development Plan p requires a 3 1/2 month process. To expedite the process, Staff offers to schedule review of the CUP by the Commission and Development Plan by the Development Review Board within the same month. If both the CUP and Development Plan are provided recommendations, each will generally appear on the same Town Council agenda. This approach works well when all issues are resolved prior to recommendation by the Commission and DRB review. BACKGROUND: The subject property consists of 7.88 acres and the zoning is R1-36, one residence per 36,000 square feet. The p p y existing site consists of two buildings approximately 22,000 square feet in size, a pool area, tennis courts and golf course area. The improvements within the site were built between the early 1960's and the mid 1970's. When the Town adopted the Zoning Code in 1981, the uses and buildings on this site became legal non- conforming. Under the Town's legal non-conforming use provisions, the clubhouse could be expanded up to 50% but demolition and relocation are not allowed. The applicant wishes to demolish the existing structure and replace and expand the clubhouse facility beyond the 50% standard. If approved, the CUP will confer legal conforming status. F:\OV\OV8\2004\8-04-07\reports\TCCUP.RPT.doc TOWN OF ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Page 2 SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT: The applicant's proposal osal would involve the demolition of two existing buildings in order to construct the new p 28,000 square foot club house facility. The new location is necessary to allow the existing buildings to remain while the new ones are constructed. Overall, the amount of activity(membership totals) is limited by the charter so the expansion will not have much effect on activity. The new development will include the following elements: • Three new buildings 1. Building one (17,254 sf.). —Main clubhouse facility, administrative offices, kitchen/dining, service and storage in basement level. 2. Building two (8,843 sf.)—Pro shop, lockers and cart storage in basement level. 3. Building three(1,941 sf.)—health/fitness area. • Swimming pool area(2,450 sf.) • Expansion of parking area with a total of approximately 183 vehicular parking, golf cart and bicycle spaces. • Passenger drop off and bag drop off areas. • Loading area. • Landscaped buffer yards along the perimeter of the site. • Ap edestrian pathway connecting from Greenock Drive to the main entrance of the building. • Expansion of driving range and new putting/chipping greens. • Upgrade access points into the facility by reconfiguring the existing driveway off Greenock Drive and maintaining the existing driveway off Valle Del Oro. SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: R1-36, Single Family Residential, Oro Valley Estates Subdivision. South: R1-43, Single Family Residential, Oro Valley Heights. East: R-4, Town House Residential, The Colony at Oro Valley and Valle Del Oro Townhomes. West: R1-36, Single Family Residential, Oro Valley Country Club Estates Golf Course. OVZCR ANALYSIS: Compliance • The development has provided buffer yards in accordance with Code requirements. • A maximum building height of 18' is permitted within this zone. Architectural elevations have not been submitted to determine actual building height. The applicant has assured staff that the buildings will be in conformance with the height requirements, as required by Code. • The proposed development in concept meets the required buildings setbacks; however, a final plat amendment will also be required to remove the internal lot lines and reconfigure the perimeter lot lines adjacent to the golf course area. Once this is achieved, the development will formally meet the required building setbacks. The applicant is in the process of initiating this amendment and will be addressed during the development plan process. F:\OV\OV8\2004\8-04-07\reports\TCCUP.RPT.doc TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 'OWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Page 3 Not in Compliance • The total number of vehicular parkings is not in compliance with the OVZCR parking requirements. The Code specifies 197 parkings are required based on the proposed uses. The plan depicts 183 spaces; however; based on the Planning & Zoning Commission's recommendation to preserve the select trees, a total of 175 spaces will be provided. The applicant has submitted an alternative parking analysis per the review criteria of Section 27.6.c.2 of thegarkin code. The alternative compliance is subject to Development Review Board review and p approval byTown Council and will be addressed during the development plan process. In sum, Staff pp supports this request because of the minimal amount of activities on a typical day and the number of members that commute to and from the facility in their golf carts. • TheJ ro'ect is not in compliance with the required setback as specified in the Golf Course Overlay p District of the OVZCR. The code specifies that a minimum 200' setback from the center of green be maintained and a 150' setback has been provided. The code allows a reduction in setbacks based on a recommendation from a golf course architect. A Golf Course Architect has been hired and has provided a recommendation. This is subject to Development Review Board review and approval by Town Council and will be addressed during the Development Plan process. In sum, Staff supports the reduced setbacks as recommended by the golf course architect. 'ECTION 3-201,USE PERMITS: Conditional Use Permits may be granted based on consideration of the following criteria: A. That the granting of such conditional use permit will not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare. In arriving at this determination, the factors which shall be considered shall include the following: 1. Damage or nuisance arising from noise, smoke, odor, dust, vibration or illumination; The main club house building is located approximately 200' away from the nearest residential home. The health fitness area and pro shop/cart storage facilities are located in closer proximity (approximately 150'). Due to the nature of the intended uses, they do not raise the potential for noise nuisance. Overall, there is adequate screening along the bufferyards, which consists of existing and supplemental vegetation to minimize any noise impacts. There is potential for noise nuisance from the pool area and vehicle headlight glare from the parking area on the north side of the property. In an effort to mitigate these potential nuisances, a screen wall and dense vegetation will be provided along the north side of this development. F:\OV\OV8\2004\8-04-07\reports\TCCUP.RPT.doc TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 'TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Page 4 Thep ool area is located approximately 30' from the property line to the edge of water and 80' to the nearest residential home. The pool location has been a concern to staff because of the proposed location along the perimeter of the site and the proximity to the property line. Amenities such as a pooltypically are t icall located within the internal areas of a recreation facility and not along the perimeter areas, which tend to raise thep otential for noise impacts. While the required setback (side yard) is 15', this use is more similar to recreational facilities as allowed in the Parks and Open Space District. Under thearks and Open Space district, all recreational facilities such as pool areas are required to p p be a minimum of 50' away from the property lines. A meeting was held on January 18 between several neighbors and the applicant in an effort to resolve this issue. In the end, both agreed that a distance of at least 35' would be maintained from thep roperty line to the pool area (water edge). Please see public comment section for more information on this meeting. 2. Hazard to persons and property from possible explosion, contamination,fire or flood; Thep roj ect must meet all Building Code safety requirements. There are no uses proposed that substantially elevate the risk to surrounding property owners. 3. Hazard occasioned by unusual volume or character of traffic. It is not anticipated that a major increase in traffic will occur from the proposed expansion because the facility provides services to existing residents. B. That the characteristics of the use proposed in such use permit are reasonably compatible with types of uses permitted in the surrounding area as required in Sec. 3-201B. The clubhouse facility will provide a social center for the members of the community within the Oro Valley Country Club Estates. The proposed use is an already existing use on the site and the proposed improvements will be reasonably compatible with neighborhood scale of the area. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION ACTION: At their regular meeting of January 4, 2005, the Planning & Zoning Commission voted (6 - 0) to conditionally approve the use permit for the new clubhouse facility with the following conditions: 1. The pool area must be shifted at least 50' away from the northern property line or switch the location of the fitness area with the pool area (Revise Condition #1 to say the Applicant will work with the neighbor to the north to her satisfaction. On January 18, the applicant met with several neighbors in an attempt to resolve their concerns (see public comment section for more details). 2. The proposed layout must be reconfigured to accommodate all recommendations within Exhibit C (letter from McGann & Associates) Revise Condition #2, to provide an additional parking space on either F:\OV\OV8\2004\8-04-07\reports\TCCUP.RPT.doc TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ,OWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Page 5 side of PV12, PV11, and PV10 as landscaped area; convert 3 spaces adjacent to PV2 to compact spaces; and, if possible, create another 3 feet of landscaped area adjacent to CF7. The applicant is in the process of revising the site plan to preserve the select trees as identified on the applicable plans. This will be addressed during the development plan process. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD ACTION: At their regular meeting of January 11, 2005, the Development Review Board recommended continuance of the Development Plan and Landscape Plan until the conditional use permit is approved. The major issue at the meeting involved the proximity of the pool area from the adjacent residential home to the north and the following is a summary of the issues presented by the resident located directly north of the pool area: • 50' setback to be established from fitness area or pool area to property line • Noise nuisance: from pool activities, pool mechanical equipment and grill/snack bar area • Lighting around pool • Design of drainage area north of the pool area • Phasing of landscape buffer along the north side of property &ENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE: Staff has reviewed the proposed use permit with regards to the General Plan Policy Design Elements. In particular, the following Policies apply: Policy 9.1D, "All development proposals should attempt to arrange buildings, and/or arrangement of lots to preserve views from adjacent properties and streets while providing privacy for residents. " The club house facility has been designed in a manner to position the buildings away from the residential homes; however, there is not adequate distance between the pool area and property line. This issue has been addressed previously in this report. Policy 8.1G, "Indigenous (native desert) vegetation and riparian habitats should be maintained where possible." The applicant has proposed to mitigate a large majority of the trees that are categorized as significant vegetation. Because of the enormous size and caliper of the existing trees,preservation in place should be achieved. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENT: All property owners within 600 feet of the site have been notified of the public hearing in accordance with the Town notification requirements. On December 13, 2005, a neighborhood meeting was held to inform residents of the proposed development. At this meeting, there were no major site plan issues addressed and the majority of the residents were in support of the proposed club house improvements. Since this meeting, staff and the applicant have met with the homeowner located directly north of the pool area to address their concerns. There were also numerous resident concerns raised at the January 11 DRB meeting. As a result of the pending concerns, a meeting was scheduled between the developer and several neighbors. F:\OV\OV8\2004\8-04-07\reports\TCCUP.RPT.doc TOWN OF ORO VALLEY OWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Page 6 On January 18, the Oro Valley Country Club met with several neighbors to resolve the pending issues. The following is a summary of the agreements made: 1. The pool water edge will be at least 35' from the property line. 2. The pool will have no diving boards. 3. The pool equipment area and snack bar will not exceed 14' in height. 4. All pool equipment must be fully enclosed within a 5' sided structure. 5. Lighting: • No exterior lights along the north side of the pool equipment structure. • No lights within the pool area above 6' in height-excluding underwater lighting. • All exterior lighting on the north side of the fitness building shall be under canopy. 6. A 6' high screen wall must be positioned to commence at the northwest edge of the pool equipment structure and extending approximately 115' parallel with the property line and terminating in proximity to the northeast edge of the pool area. From this point, a 3' - 6" high screen wall will curve around the perimeter of the parking and sidewalk area extending to the northwest corner of the tennis courts (this wall will provide offsets and an opening for pedestrian connection). The walls will consist of a CMU brick with a stucco finish and cap accent. The color and texture of the wall will blend in with the existing buildings. 7. The walls as specified in condition#6 must be constructed during Phase 1. 8. A minimum 5'-7' landscape buffer must be maintained between the north drainage wall and the existing trees on the south side of the Tearse's property. The drainage wall must be established in a manner to preserve the existing vegetation. 9. There will be no permanent grill facilities within the snack bar area. 10. No loudspeakers or PA systems within the pool area. 11. The pool hours will be limited to 8am-8pm and beyond these hours only lap swimming can occur. The aforementioned comments have been incorporated as conditions in Exhibit A. SUMMARY OF FACTORS: Factors For: 1. The proposed club house facility would not have any significant impacts to the adjacent property owners. 2. The clubhouse facility is an already existing use. 3. The Oro Valley Country Club has met with several neighbors and resolved the pending issues. Factors Against: There are no factors against. SUGGESTED MOTIONS: move to approve Ordinance No. (0)0.5-08 , conditional use permit for a new clubhouse facility, subject to the conditions described in Exhibit A. OR F:\OV\OV8\2004\8-04-07\reports\TCCUP.RPT.doc TOWN OF ORO VALLEY OWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Page 7 I move to approve Ordinance No. (0)0-5-c)8_, conditional use permit for a new clubhouse facility, subject to the conditions described in Exhibit A and the following additional condition(s): OR I move to deny Ordinance No. (0) 05-08 , conditional use permit for a new clubhouse facility, finding that: Attachments: 1. Ordinance No. (0)Q5-08 2. Exhibit A 3. Site Plan "-4- cc: Linda Thompson, Fax: 881-7492 PlanniZoni Administrator Peter Carli & Patrick Steffel, Fax: 297-7071 Commu 'ty evelo ent Director Town Manager F:\O V\OV 8\2004\8-04-07Ueports\TCCUP.RPT.doc ORDINANCE NO. (0) 05- 08 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A NEW CLUBHOUSE FACILITY AT THE ORO VALLEY COUNTRY CLUB, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF GREENOCK DRIVE AND VALLE DEL ORO, PARCELS, 224-34-1650, 224-35-0810, 820, 830, 350, 360, 370 & 910 WHEREAS, The WLB Group, representing the Oro Valley Country Club, requests approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to construct a new clubhouse facility at the Oro Valley Country Club with an underlying zoning designation of R1-36 (one residence per 36,000 square feet), located on the northwest side of Greenock Drive and Valle Del Oro; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed said CUP request at a duly noticed Public Hearing on January 4, 2005, in accordance with State Statutes, and having made its unanimous recommendation of approval with conditions to the Town Council; and WHEREAS, the Oro Valley Town Council has duly considered the CUP request and the Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendation and conditions at a Public Hearing and finds that it is consistent with the Town's General Plan, and other Town ordinances; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY: SECTION 1. That the CUP for a new clubhouse facility at the Oro Valley Country Club be granted per Article 3-2 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code, Revised (OVZCR) and that all applicable development standards in the OVZCR and the conditions attached as Exhibit "A" shall apply thereto said property. SECTION 2. That this ordinance and the various parts thereof are hereby declared to be revocable. If any section, sub-section, sentence, clause,word or phrase of this ordinance is, for any reason,held to be unconstitutional, such holdings shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 2nd day of February, 2005. Paul H. Loomis,Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM Tobin Sidles,Acting Town Attorney EXHIBIT A OV8-04-07 OV COUNTRY CLUB 1. Thep ool water edge will be at least 35' from the property line. 2. The pool will have no diving boards. 3. Theq ool equipment area and snack bar will not exceed 14' in height. p 4. All pool equipment must be fully enclosed within a 5' sided structure. 5. Lighting: • No exterior lights along the north side of the pool equipment structure. • No lights within the pool area above 6' in height—excluding underwater lighting. • All exterior lighting on the north side of the fitness building shall be under canopy. 6. A 6' high screen wall must be positioned to commence from the northwest edge of the pool equipment structure extending approximately roximately 115' parallel with the property line and terminating in proximity to the northeast pool e of the area. From this point, a 3' - 6"high screen wall will curve around the perimeter of the parkingand sidewalk area extending to the northwest corner of the tennis courts (this wall will provide offsets and an opening for pedestrian connection). The walls will consist of a CMU brick with a stucco finish and cap accent. The color and texture of the wall will blend in with the existing buildings. 7. The walls as specified in condition#6 must be constructed during Phase 1. 8. A minimum 5'-7' landscape buffer must be maintained between the north drainage wall and the existing trees on the south side of the Tearse's property. The drainage wall must be established in a manner to preserve the existing vegetation. 9. There will be no permanent grill facilities within the snack bar area. 10. No loudspeakers or PA systems within the pool area. 11. Thep ool hours will be limited to 8am-8pm and beyond these hours only lap swimming can occur. 12. Thero osed layout must be revised as follows: provide an additional parking space on either side p p y of PV 12, PV 11, and PV 10 as landscaped areas, convert 3 spaces adjacent to PV2 to compact spaces and ifp ossible, create another 3 feet of landscaped area adjacent to CF7 (the corresponding tree number is reflected on the Native Plant Preservation Plan). F:\OV\OV8\2004\8-04-07\reports\TCCUP.RPT.doc ,11, EE 2 , r .1 g 11 m . cc, ,, ,i; ,, N ; i - -r .�Z ., ....., PR 41 -6 , i 1,, Y'^ 2 11 -,t -i 124 1,t----- ,. .,,,z i _ . ..,.,i ' k-,:-,: > iraii 11, ap (J p rpt np� ? O pGp 'p� !V y o n 11 d. /� Ill - !t•*.t�6:':•'• � � A� A ..1 00 t0 N A A D f7 3 � 1-v � :� �•�� ;T.,: �4•�:.,�'obR ,iyzy � �..� ,.l ' 00 , gCA 1i A{j::,rr 111 1 �•��gpgpqp�••• N -5,, N it- aD D m N F., rr��. N"� N + C1 IV V A O ID Ol N � � - � � � � 1i r.,..;1,3 ,} �n 1 hl Qs , I l .-,...,1: u: Sys N �� . o acit 4 -� �.�.\V 1:9). / ilA / 1. �. 5 t n if§fig} 4 - • .g \ j ,,„/ tirA hi'/4•27*, m 1" ------ '' ,,----- 0- / '- 111%.,;0,1011,,,---------, / <//:/>, „, / lio /1 i 'V d- '41110, 1 \ /::'J A N- _/_y<\ fr_______Th 18 • tiViliiiA.- .1'‘b ktik.,,,_L,k ,f//;,; - # \\. \\ r 0) \ l'.1:1 j, 2,---------'--\ '-' 7--'14iike, 70.4.i \fi- 4 / Ili ,irfatk\\iir*-N ''''',.\.--s'''--- ,// i'''' \ \_ \..., 11111110M4-\:%\--__-_-_---- 1'. \ .\\ , 6 ,,,,,,,___\ likt_.440:,>.sx , , .. L A. „Ls/1i,... .,,,,,,,\--7141,pfetr477,11v ic____,,,,, • \\.., \C.?-, \ ..'io,v.i-,L:44., 4- „„),\ ,- \- - /\ NI ,..._\.. --*„.., ..s, _1\ ii.,- ,,.., .„. ...4,-„... .. i, \ ‘. , , \ - „,,,,4,, .. , . ":, , gr• / • \\T C )3 \-r,- I• .: r� i titIlii \ / \ /M �, h\ �� .f , r`fi- • \<\ .10Wof J�it • glir •til -t r r., �...',• ,i► N'• � � IMM,_ ti yi \01 _400,0,--- „ ...3 1:::,':. 46 /.- il , . -'N %.:_i I\\ .'. t "."- 31 wr Imo'`.! \i- i„, iiir--,.....--. 3.-s- --...k1 \iio \ . ./ 4,... . Nor.*-. / '''I N IffirL.---ah-t 14,11 0.--`,10 -,,:, _AkL., . . IA I '\')Virl'--,_,;:1:;2, '''l I N31111‘,,,,,,,,0 I ,II' ��, \ :J��\�,\�� li*Oree,_ \..._ , ,P(' libior ---\ �0�L.4� ,� � i� �� .`�►� ,,moi \_, � ��:1 : .,,, 0 ii i 1, vk, ,__,,-,4: 1,JI, /,,,,,,v,1,40-,-,,v, eftv, , ..6-N, ____ \A,11.3,-,....:_,..�► �'•� `� :��' =�� Com_.i. _ ,,\s' 4 of / \ \ 111\,, 1116.4404----t, •� '},I +-�l�r. ,�'k� .t.i,. JA.. r•Sw..ti. 1��.]�l` �.w.�! '', �f /-,, LAW"-wA, - •\ v, .. ,.1 \\ ,,. .. : 11-sNN-•.,`-, ,,,ivo,., illb ..,:,?..:;:li. :.4M:%%%.7.-•;:ziiQ:';;;.--,,,ii% NE: \riff ::. ifi,, .-\, ,, 0 ...;4:;:•:0'.t.;:.,:.:,40. ., 4 \\\,,, -4,-,..- R ... ,-_: s'2---,\ ''' ., f tn I) 7:1,.n.,,,.........0..., copriv-i-- ..I i:,\vef\ , . , ..',•, . N,,,,, ."‘ to ••tik-.' ,,,' 'lli 1'1 ' '-- s :2 lib\ **/(--; ---QT itiFf -9' ti. - 44 .1.-\ W ---- N 0 -1 ilk 1714)N4:-.4"- -- :;',4',. \\*4-.1 \. •v!I \----°,_ _:/4:----..a'—'-;;" -10/i0 -,0°"1::--2; --- \ ' ,'re" ti.' ; -dr— - ------- --,:-..V.: ‘\\ . ii- '--- -,-V.›., �.°I \\. �, Pk" , C,_ o_ 40 •� \\- 3•.05' '• ,,,,. ....,,\..:,...:,. ...‘-\\,, • \,'--'4 ,, ,s.,',.....:,,..r.:it'. 44,:: -i ' 11. \.' '----.;001.1S. ' '-'vAlrillle.- 411111 \•'' 11- s 4\ - - .- -, ,,,. N qr-*,-':-: '''.- -.;=:.,.. ,, .,. kw -,•- i ---7 poPA.,..--#-- ,,--","--- - &If N' \,..i.. 1...' ,, ' 'N' N. --4 -.J'..,.,A t 14e-/ ' ' ......,,..h_ ,, ., \ ..,;:., '.:f::.'. •jip. -\ - l''''' \,\\41074 <\':‘ •::'...; ,,��. .•,: , ��.�.•.;., � .'yam. - 4..ppq 1� ;A,1::, OIRE - .W \v.r4 0, t k, ,'"U4,... \,-- . . ,,...,?-4.. P- ,11=',P.:.,...i-l'grliteP.V.Iirk.14 AtirOara-riiiratL-4401mdfit$ti"\VIV 'A Maas. s \ • N.., vx,-,--N /i.. / 9,.,it.=-,.:'.747 s',9f,,,-.-ek fir ",-*.*.i..*V.e.:Ll,'ONigatiy- ttlern.47\\‘‘ -Ai 1 Ad liEl '\ '. 'kk\''NtiTk %i'l ,7:....:~Aiii,.-:',.-*/:.`," ):':,\,-,\\\-4,,'',---,,itow-r: .....,-,-,L:,-0*,1,46,.)V,01 b :. `;'•Z ,,,i:5,:::;::,.. --- -_,N.,,N t .„,.,-*.,;Ak..,..,. , ,,, ,so,.._, A.,,, 0,4,it-„. '.,_ / -:, 44f:4717;„," :.:2_,,,, ; -,k,,, 4, ,::.:::.::: ' -,- N\ kw". - \ b - ..,- 4riaii: °I.C. :,:,- •np, ,0-00116.. .1.4,044,4 , ...,,)_'-. • -,,A, 46.. •,- 2-- ,s .:‘..,fD km-- t)' ..i lk-P-r...-la - t.,1 . "0. ... , ''Pr-az'ler tif ..../ i ' .. 2-. MI ,.'..,::.:1.------7,-= ''‘Aif- -4-4,Ar•-e-c'°--, ';4 p q' eit."•44:it, ,...'...'CA I :, ..:•,' - .1--,PA .-..,,, p- „,, ,- \ y ! kli, 1%. ,,,:...:.,.:.i.....,., I ,-L-s, 4.4,, - - :.gi,,,,'4,.. 44-ig „,,,.-„,.... ....„,..- _ eill I ' .. 7- •,' . IftwIll igi' .4:::" .-. mt.:14 1 1 T ','Ni::;:,.:”."';`): ,, -^.Q 20' 4 �'' X ��ad�%,Vst . ` '�I I e j. ;4 ..•l:. At .�( flam,- o � [I :�'�1..`I.F141 !r .c •:cry' A \\1" ',� !"441 VIII.1"&hAliii- ��_q;� I k.71.-- � �� ,!F' n 12 4 re 411' `�`..' . • [Fa 4 \ '� L'Ilik' 1' li..;:- 'WV' *`''\ \ X <,€-_,.' .., ,,,it...,_,;.,x ck. \ 7 ..\\\,,,,,.._.,,,,„,, ...„ \ \ \ , .„ ..„. 1 :. . ,„ ,8 7. ,- t. .,'I ki4 ‘4,1,,_ 1, 4' ,I\ \\\'" '\ *:...:400, 1' ' --- '',-, I'?•( , ..,. \ -'•Ii?\-ii,-,,-\ - --,--- i.,.. ,.,,,OP • 8 \' "N 17 5'-20'(sEE PIM !�� \\ �•':.ii:; \rivAir: oi. �`►, / •�lr. ?I.'" r i 1 .: FAL._ ' -' ),\ 1 / 401 . ,, ,i;2'D. i 2 ,, , ag �1 1 �' �y • / ,..,, .0I ! � p- E k i 1,_r ‘ ./ "a7,,.§-,it / _ 1,,,i, Md C cr, 18 E \ \.1‘ ,..lki6 et*)v .iik'-'''.- . go._ \\\\\\, , ,--- ', ,./0 1 1.:1 tvg '‘. ......... -,...p. '' .• ''.‘- i ::w alk 53g. 7. �c =1 )C- „\ i 53gcO r ' { 0r77C = 1I I F1° I 1 L....F.?, i)1"i3!! i I' .. Vi - '' 4e • i Falk lot, . , .• .�,:� .g$ �z \ � i,,t�:•r ill I�f�� '� -4 C. •it 1 ----..,...11.. Air 11.r,,- ”'5 Ifg' '', \ , ,., - rimriver 7 , ' \‘,\ omo� la s 6`•1j✓'' "�p to tn"�1 Io g\-,1\1 1I \ \416....\\ --,-----:,-_,\,..1--\ . i� �►O�l >,'wF� 'w2 ‘;',--- 7`.`"7 s s p,• 1HE COLONY AT ARO VALLE DEL ORO VALLEY TOBNHOAIES > " BK a PG 12 BK,,NPC2,2 0 4025A\DEVELOPMENT\10402SA DEV 2.DVK • TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 3 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: February 2, 2005 C TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL FROM: Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk SUBJECT: RESCHEDULING THE REGULAR MEETING FROM WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 2005 TO TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 15, 2005 SUMMARY: Due to the UNICEF/Steinway Peace Piano Tour in Oro Valley scheduled for Wednesday, February 16, 2005, Mayor Loomis is asking that our regularly scheduled meeting of February 16th be rescheduled for Tuesday, February 15th SUGGESTED MOTION: I MOVE to reschedule the 2" regular meeting for February from February 16, 2005 to Tuesday, February 15, 2005. Department Head Town Manager .,,::,:..„. ILLE, ., itC)R Grea,,r . A,:„:,,„„,,,,,,,, -,, . .,-,1-ikr ir:Tip, its ounce E' ` h as •" UNICEF Steinway Peace Piano Tour In Oro featuring The Uni University rei t)airli#J11155i4111 with .:-..-:::.. T _ Tannis � a r ou ,.,.,„i,,.,, {iy:Wednesday, e ruar ....,,:,,,:,,:.:„.„ ..:.,,„:„,,,:„.,,,,,,,, ,,,, ::.�..i....:.......:.4�...�....:.....'..i.:..?..�....:.........:.:......:.:.......:.:....}....::......}..:.:....:.:.......:.:........:::.........:::.......:v:v......:... .:.::...:.:.::...:.:...:..::.::...::..:......�.........�:...>.3..i....:..Y:..:.......:...... ,f...,..:.... .:.-:.::.::.;....?- i... i}..iY.. >.r.'::C.4f:.fi}:::Q4::{::ii::i:?::::•!}i:.}r.iY::�:! ..n..:...:v.:. ..:•::..n;•..::.;...?.:..•:�.r.•::.•..:•....:..::•.n.:..}.:...:.:}:.:•...:Y:/:�..}:r{..�.S:,':+}:n::.::: :.25.:..-.v..:..:..:.:...:..:..v..•:..�...... n..,....: :.r .:..•.:....:..r.:n,-.•.::.n.:n.S.L-n-.:{•:�.n.?.v,:;::.n:. -:.:::�::.::.b.Y.:....:..:.......rfirrrR•:..S...?:i:ii.......n:v..:..:�:....:. i.}�.a:•.Y::.v-: .:v:•.:-::.G :.?.:.:.5i:.•:.:..c.i }:.:;Y..:i:.}v.?•y.:Y:ritSi{4�' y 165 2005 Y::i:�:•::�:v�:?:[.?i..tY�} :+i :<L2v�:rY L:•.+:,.F.}.in:{{?iY: .Y.ikb..F. }.:.r rSi,.•.}):•viYp.i-.}iS•.:}i}r•i.i :.F:4.i.iY.•:..:{F.i.ni•. :•}•ilY :C:ty}' Yi . ,, 7 .Y.}iv:ii.Yi}i}Y:tJ?4i2 { i C' p.m.:..'.t. t :i....:.i : : r4t.i::v}: �Si.i:4},.} •4Y:x\„n::W?:tY.:.4::; y:C:..4 „„:181,0,11, n }v2xF: ..,:„.....:., ,. 3'' °. .i.':. ::.. l Y Fi F' .. i ***1/0 h Ridge � �::�� ?iiY:: . Yi'�:N} 4vt ,..„:,,,,,.„.,,„0""-.,.,:::,,,„.. 1 ,• :.. -,:, 4„,,,,,„,...:::::::,.„.„,,,,,.,,,,,,,,,, --. fi+v}i : torium ;tf :Yiti{ +i f�-: .. n. Jn }7f:: + . :o� : ::::. � 2iY?:?ixC?{?fi�.iii'?^:;:C x}Y tw :4vxiYt .:R{iFYnFi;vfW::: :: : .1E------um,,,,,,,,,,,-----,7„..n ; Y.}nRv ... w• L . . . . ra a. n � �::-:•s::.:•+s .. : /n?.:.: }:}ll .. --- i:?C;:::nfv;v6Y:4v.v:?w:viiii::Yvv :nv.vn�n::nnrniR`$ .r4vn • r :, iv:v!.:..;:v}}.{v4v :. 'v ; ........ .:rw: ....:l...,.•...... wUnxn./ ... r" ... l? .FxY}v }%{CYBvvv::.: ..vnr .... Nn$:n}tinvop......::,,,,,,,,:„:„.-: ;.......... ..,....v..... :...:........ .... -: .::::: M ::.: tr':':: :'' '':: .....::.....:.::.... vyrivi::v:.:::vv ::' . Siiid-ItS-S— ?:::: •:•vv.nv.v:::v:v}f-':• ' 'li: :, :: ,. r . : rn . ::•-n..,v....:4•Aduit§ 5.L{ 4:!: iYisii: �?:ii,Yeii:,:4:� v..iY:.i�::.Y..::..4:i.:;...•v�:iyYf L•r::4:h•:;:v:x:vn::.•::..}:...Y}.•.Y.i.s:.o}....Y..::}...:..:Y:..i.Fi..4:i..:..i::...:.?.:..i:i:i:i..:vi.as:..:?.^..:..:l..i.i.:.:.:..n.;i.v.:n..S.}}:}rivx:}r: :4.khv.. i }r ; "Y�i :.::r;t ;' i!y................. ....: .:::.:4. n ...„::„.„„•,,,,::,,„,,,,,,„,„,.„,,„.„„„,,„„,„ ....... :/:.t::v::::..n• ::•n,...v.•.n.i ...: : Yiv.. ln3vci;�,.... -ov . :, Yn•ivn: Jnviaii � T41NY+f : '' ' ,..8,,.,:.:, ......... ,,,„,i;,:. ::':�:....••.:.:..:'.:.....}.........-:.......��.:..::..:;..Yv ^ „: .. -4:10,01.,:.,,,, ::f?::,:.:.r.: ::... .,}:::::;u :r ..:...::..:.::...::.:......:...,:.......:......:..................._........................................�.:......:........,......::.......:..............:........•....,....._............................:...........:......;...........:....:.............:....:..._..,.:......,:.-...:...:n...:....:.:,.......:...fi..........:..........:........:.'......•,..:.......:._:....:. ...•.....:'..�..:.:,".: .�.:::...:::.�..:.'...:. . : : . y•r4s� ... a. %r f .,.:F • . :,,,.. 47:7:U.1.:... :':„.::„:—.."'.... '''''' ...- . :s1.1111111:111111111111111,4- O:::.: .. ' 1 General „:„-L--7.-..---,...,:p..):2 "�::7i::{ //[ '''''''''''''''"11•111•111'14'"'''''''' iji; 16iS onsore3 . tenwa Pnoll�e S`. hk^•:::: ¢1. .yyh vk�! .. v r i:•w" P1`' f/t, . Piano�'� . ,;�-�S : r :s . y ''''u:'''''''''''''''''''*:„,'„„'„'„„i'''''„::':::::... ''".""'"'""1"'""R"'""'"."'"":::"':'''"'"""'""""'i''''.1g3.1441* ... IS-i!.:;,-4441-0.11:1:10,:o:.:7,:,:„. :... 4♦ .: i „...„,,:.„7,.......:..,..„......„...:.„..,.., y lf � Professor, r t OV,1111111:111!!!!!!!T!„„::,:-...,.....,.... . . ) . +iia.44i•`1h ; .. r.iliti:N":5°.i'''''' '..-1,1 1 , > :::i,:✓ ,:;:H'" L R/y t' : i;•rai: irio4::S:j% N` � 4,rfIC1 : . .. .. ,,•:',.:4-.'.." '.:�. ,.;,� rg. .::?, r x:.111w2ty� .�p: w Gw e :�,?f.�..;r'i:�:;. � :.' %.. :;_Y.. .:.:.: n?M-;r%.. : . tk ,H-,.. $*#'....4":4,:i. k�f�� 4ty� lirli." ht4 ( rt .:% wk•G . ? :: f•,.„,„:: o.} /hfi.},:,.::,.: . ff ,�i6 '.b & r �',i9 :n , i,00.7...t: iTanrusGibson k...:.„,,:: ''.'::- ...... . . . , ,.„., i.:;::::. ti;:, ti'diiiiii::;-.:7!!!!!!'::',Cii:iillikil::::it 1f•::L :: ...'` � ? xv:a j �S r<o ti ...:.. .- ?3aH1�i"v 5 . ..:y 1:.:. 5 4 / .c: : �r .,--,1"..31::;:11.111111: : : H/>. 1:11.:',11,11--..' '-.. , w„y1A. y .a:�:S. .� 6� {OYY4y rr;:ittl :4ad1.rr%. / Y i. '>r,r ,,:: , r�;l::!o.. J: v.y"::.:r i }* Rrrs' r4;r : '/ N 2 .:i ,�. ''''i,::,..1.1 ifillril.,...•:,..:.:.:..,.-- 11.-„,,,,‘ b,..-,wlNo< , :- .::.. yt .:._...... I. . a : _;•f 4� C 4 . of.:�:: v$ e, .. . :f Y +^ fn / x wiiiii::::'14;,iiii1111!7.:.:iii. :. ...... . 4 1: / . : p .. : . rA ” ?U1ihy}�" Cr :}h.. .. .y -...:: :. .... , ... l . , : MO " Yq,n.�\ a ., : " yi {:.:. vlv..::. hax ,rn ::: : in4.1nz ::. v fJ•.••........„.„,„„:„.,::......,:.......:::.„: ,, ...{{i iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiihe EoF Goo. dwillAmPeabcaesPsadianroL. an Lang ...........w.... i;..y.. ..,v....:a : i, .. R��AA,rr �/ � ./ rKfi ,.�.1� a sn:.:�4 ?<.L:Y .ww,a:ii;}n : 4.1:1X4ii.i ::Pz. plays the Steinway an Flutist,Tom War ClouGOVAC at 797-3959.McdLaughlin For more information and tiBcketfst UNICEF, contactProceedsene a non-profit agency dedicated to the welfare of children, world-wide. 4.•,'i 7, ' - -i.2- --• _. •,.. .- 02'.02. °5 (5,r.i...„,,, a ir " = !..riklir .., �, .- ,,., - . „... . . .. / , , . ., -,,, , . , c: iii„ititiol, tr.o...tii:34440 tp„eej. .1ll '- 111.11'i ‘ j s w t '-'7i' ''-'.- ra4 „,..„,, , .2,, w. �4f , ,.... .. , . Y1 t 1 �' �' • r' Tit,• ;` ;r 1 • � 1 p�t r f r `' iiii �+ Syys, ,,....►" --V-. ,,,t ...,410xv,„ , — . , , v - . fit:..,,....3/4,,,c!-,',.,,,..-7-,,4 ,,f'. .-.::.,:. , ----.-.:..e)......, _..,.., ........,_. . .,..)1,Ati t,- - , • • ,y 'iii*��' Y -i, `` moi-'�_ ._. - "---f.....i ...i, .,, . ,___.— :..iii!....,-. .#41'.-- ' . . . - _.......:, _- __ -4' P • 4644* 'jet" . aye ,,,i,,`C+�� ,,n. • fid r ` 111 Y J,4 S_ K` „riarfotiraosso..„.......„,,,,:. - , - ' —---"4'.,...:41.•'-• --•--71:.'2., .. - ,-.... Ira .._• --;”-.•'''''''.-- .... di. d .11.....0 ....-- . • . -tdad...:dd,d•• 'id'att'redr.. ..,-- - .. ., .. .4•E''''''''' -.,..'.........---' "-- ' . • ! - .... .. • - -_,---. ' -------- , ••,, .......-,.-..-_ ....,-...-_,..4.....,---,--.-- , - . _- ---....,........- • ,,--. -.----,--_......-„,:-.., • - - .---- Al"::L.:41;2(-7, -..i;',--_,.....47.- _-.0.... -. • --. -. - ---.,-----.--- - -- P TV' . _ . - --......--.7.- ._ , ..•. -........ ._....., , . , ., .. .,. - ' ,...,,, -....0641 g;:',, f 7'.:::4,.•,,,7'1.,47 ..,..-- . . "'‘+'. -4--...-.-"•-Li.s.'---f,-,-i, ---:-.-,---....‹....._.4....,..,- , _...„._• - ',..-.,• 'L.,-i.s.:-.tr-qi.,;:.,-..,...,, . . ..-,,. . ,...,..„..,-,..- - ,4.---7-7--_, -..-j.,,,..,:,--•!.-...-i4.-',..•... .'--' „ _,— .,......,..,.,- .......-,,,,,..-t- • ...::.7,,..•-•,,,,f),- ---,., •-, -.. .. i ,_.,.-_-_1,.;:',,,-,-,_. -•,.1 •.-.:-...*- •. •-- , -- - — ..,..„,,,9,-...-7i...,-e,i•_,,,.,-,,,,,,,;,..2. _ •-- - ' _:,--:--"--',-----.-..4•0t...--- /- - • :-' -- ).....!--e-., •,.,t4.-7,-;.-••••., -. •--- ....- -.. _.,......,,/. ....!- .-,, , ..., . - ...- • _-,,,a,„--....z.-,---,-----,,,.. 4 t.„4,11e,' 0 .-.#- --' ..".`"..' ,',' , " ... _e. -;,...41C.....;;;''_---,,, , . ' _...., - • 4 - , • . .-',, • ..,,,,,,ip A,,.iy4......, ... .4.C. . __--,... - ,".410 ,, 1* ,,,,- .*-,f/.•',.......5e,o,1.....fir."-;VA0'...' , '..:::::',:4':;";71t7:4:1 _ ' ,.. ' ...„--._4....:-'' ;:-.11.r.:'"?' -: di,-• . ' " .. ....-"-., ''''1*til4 1."'... , _.„,..-r-7,-...-:: ...itcriPt., ,•. _„.4.......,...,"•-, Air „.,'ir -•A.,' i d• ." 11, ---, • •,4„, ' ii./0 .- . . :•.',. . da ..47,.., ,.- 4 t-•sl--• — ..., .„, _ . -..., - ..- ,r* , ft ‘..1. . ,.- - • ,--,• A ,, .. , • . . --m., 4:4"....•7,,tirw, 4 - •ri„,,,,,,4,-- -,-...,, .-- • i - ,.....- '• . • -; -•. --,-,--,..--- ......- -,..,, .. ---- •b -..0: • _ .,.,-...--r.,-ig% .- .,,..-,,... -...;„,/..,(..,...... - f- I,-. .H.„., 11 ter- ° .!1 IlliiiiillillaN to t ,'�1.+�. . i-,. f -'--_1,', -,g iN* , • wv,- f. r f. a::'r {s ea i `• - '"$t`%), .=, !tea -'+`.4 1 -Vi*_ a1. w- .00.tsir y a y �s • v . •--. ....„,f- - stir .0 W .....,},, - ,r,„.., -'!"'.t�.`.. - - _ -�, _ is .. - 4, {�, a r _ +�+. -.a-_ .. --,:t;'-' :<�i 7 ...., 0 i, .. 9 4,,,,,,. . . ,i . ,-1 1." . • *-.1! ''''.—1:',,,:-: ""i'f'..ir - / :.,.,, ' . *;-_,,I;,,,, if*_ •'-y"...- -..--.f f „., '' y :,. pry.. i., tg,•.' 1.'..:-. .. • � 1 ' •c `` • �w '-�Ve•Y , TJS� tY ,a w +, •14 —, s C.j+ I. ,_fix •!-' '>'i _ I ..�4w•° ••t`�Vim•'." ,�:••'"-.. 4~_ i�i. ',i• 10.7!--, ��-. --7.._ r ...,41- !tom x: w+_ y ate_ _. r•: ._. .." „ ...._-e - r i • • ••. • 0 } !r• q. .„.: of r• ' i , x ' • • ,,'4 , • '',''''...4"4.,"1";1*" ""'•4:‘4''''''''' '''''''."..;'.'47-.....,,,':',7-...t'"K",:t.;4:i,f,"'",it"Xr:J.f"-',..':',i.'"!.l.!7.2Ill'tiqi'',:.,.:''Z•.Z!.$1:.'',.!;:':.;!'.":"l'44'.i',Mggif',1"ti'.l:7:''''",i . '�* �� e '-‘... s•' ' ....„..........,....,,,,,,,,,,,t,,"...,,,,..,..",„,,,,,,,..,".4.0....""i:il.k..,. aaa ,y m� 4 aa tr � ''';''''7';...,;:" g ," :'..i''''.','.''': \ f ,.''''..'.":....4'..t,...., > x"¢'°0 f " � I' x , 7,`l'''P�'� «@ .9 "I''''''':',/,';'1", ;� 4 w P^ ''''''''.047.:41'''''"::'"'•'-'i....'71:44..7,` «Nan4,,,,,,.. " ; +a **.f,',.H,.0;,,,k..,. `".•''''''''''44t,"",,,',..':;,,I.,,H,' 6 ,rNw r .::•,.a�►. ,"" r•,.. „SwnW,,�;RH,;,,,::, �"f; .",,�.r' w,.a�`�"t.�» �"wm-`'y.,'i°w✓ s m M'eH ✓n �:. ."a' „✓,.,.:uN�Z , • a ."twat, e�•"ti o-'"xza+�•,'<^�s a«xf z .„. w ta W atFnfi1«. xa w� „.,... ,,,',,',, .,.> „.......4,.. • i'' " s+v/e4 Nv:,• y,n¢NAaa. s s ` i ..a`•,2.!"''e: ' w wµ- a x ^ -A„ m ... � / `° w.� ' ,. a, m� � x °'Po °''';;;;I.::''''''',7. ,: , :,;:, �,w a ,, ,,,� ; .w*«� -effigy°cx 0 �a « -..:,..1.,..- ',,w w'.w«w� a r� ,. wA , 6 ” ' ww �w •," „ „ n'...,, ° v,...,::',,.7'•.:,•:,:••.•°,''''''•-•• 4. ,. .�'fiv --,';',••''''''' „, °a»xnw. . ":.' A" ° a, l/ ws" n. of • • ,r '� x ',�'.�M,m,,`wx µ• ,...„,,....„..............„.„.„../.....,„...,•..,-.c w; a ; N.,•:.',,,;;:!;•. y /M 'a m3�w,x .M °mow • ew ed4E.Jn-, ... `:t.. .,...0 ,6"'. ,.. .. • a1v:i n.L"�>.<. .. .4 ,... ,.. .,':':::.,Sr ':t'3@'•m >Vt �„n ,6•'N ...,.,.:...:"h>na,"... 9Y n ... .�'..,..t:.. ...RagV .... ;..r. :.' ../ #' w.. ',e' kiR ,4"w, , a \ ' ff .... n...;.:v.. � ..,a ..,.:.F.Y, '.', Y' F..,, ., ,o v,;�. �' :.'.w..::"" w � F:q�. ,`�w�?,fy`'N': Y,,, • °' o8_N� '", ;.: .;4�• ,�,.:.N.. / „ w ,: ,""A.,�'✓ x" '._.re ,�weN,,r ew 'v,^ a k' �� ,.o, ,, 'q �: , ,.. : , • ..: 'a.�.,:.".. a :�.a "„'.; ..,. „�owa w i-: 4, •;w�,t �:•<« , \.:l,.: ,.,,. , , ..... �, "":'P a V,.,x. (� ,,• .. .:'.: � ,1.Rt �".• ✓ yy, i:::'3'N� „e'.. v b., ,.,.::>t.�Y �> w.' .:.w.i:... :.... .rrc � tl@/...::.: :°�° �:. °�'; ;.:HY,iw� � �`yu. r• A' "d .. .. .. .:,'� o-. x • ..: or ,:, ., t:/. ;. :., ,..�•y"�: ';3�i:;a%r,N��g. �w r,.'wa<°m ',,,o. yt,::;.• N .... . .,,," ,•:�"' ,� , 9'. • t , .: .:::' �,,? �'.d',. r X..5...:,♦n. �.:..yr �• ,b w•,."i w a :: ,., &,..a : ,. .,:',' sew "°, °'mx°:..:;.„•,"w',w'"!w;:' ,"/t.,w. «,yua .:.,.., 1'....,•' .,axr„; " ne;fi *"��am'"'�,. 'w „ :„A. ,�,1°.�'. ,. 4, ':` x,'' „n,'�.,waq�:...�''�'�'y,!r, «waw'�.9r;� J'og,rxw,m ,:.�waHde ��w°�✓6°sP'e' w .' ,. .A..:;•;,,,:71.,,•••...-••;•;•• 8 yk ^a.4, a is^z ,.,�.:,,.. ;. a.4 o r"oaf"„w«w, � ew:aµ ,,.:,,• w,+,w ,a..' ✓�' ' z°...,.; � �: r ��tt u x a � ,.d*',...,:'d.. P' m t^ek wr+dr-;`ar, �, a "M' a,.' . x,..;;'....,. .. , `:.Awe w:aA° n,. +RMv2,;., ,rn ” y a�'3A�`aw .. � . s° ..�, Ra ,: .w ro,... ,. .� m a" . . ✓,�•°' i•� '»t aro «. • , e” . t a C.':^v. `. '.. • .v i., °x,`�sw < * 'ev.. e: �. N o :'.�s :.o N,', : m ;,�• • ,.r:. w..,..:6Y«. k.:<..: ... 5 .,.:.n' a.'o .,„.,-,•••,•,, ✓ ,!'^ <.. ,, N ... a�o- . %A .« .t...4x° r°1w': .w..m ,:.<. y, "., �a;id„ , �r„w % w..a m uR...r'm^o ;.£ u wey: w.,,,: „aw; w.:"b aw° ,.i.. , ,,'w.w ,.• w, -,•,•::,7',,,,,,•: m„ :° c .„...,,. :;;9.„ ,y,.. .z..,,.a, ". ron. '�_a w `, r.: ., ., w :.....o..«+ � .'. x • , a .w e ,t: ::... ..;�..w" °.m. m „. ., w .. ° N - m '°•:',- .,. .. �.. ',4,x TM :.+wr.x y ,:,`' ,.::. -, r ,u::♦ a° ".«.yg;.... ,°w an, a •... v o9;x eroxw , ° a a'. a r w... ''..,..,• ,.,.......„.,:::::.•:. �r w..a„m,wr.. o•w„•N "-.�'0e. ;r , Fe ..w N ... -•-•:..-•,,•,••-'••:i:::...•!•-•;2••,'[..:7,-.:7,•••'” ,. .tt x n a °. �&w Aw.al° :.r N.... ri°"3�':��,„yN , ;.. N. a..:•.•:;'...;:'...'''''''-• , a,: a a ww°o .,..a.,,.^ ,,,:. :.:...:a.t. ..9.. .. ••••"„:7•:',...”. „ •,,,. .. „. w ,�; ,.. ..: . wa �...;:, w-. � �.+', ,..r.:a ,. ,,: ”,,,�.v�gyy „�;r: ., ..:..w � w. 'V ,.,rw«,4 a. •' rs,: a • '.:' L r• ,,' r. ... g . a Y. ap,rn &:. ..wv ,,iaA° Yd,.p.”. K'� >�,...mrt G' • N w • ®'. .. . :::‘..-.'.:::":•:;:f-,,....... , w q.., ++a'°o M,♦y.,. °:z. .,e n„.. a"a:'. a, x ..° ,< mw 2« m �, w,d&*w.a „w;;rw/m ,Fa:g a°R�:'" .�, .;.� ry r, ..'�,. .°: .e«xw Mi' .: ,..«^ •�w'... Y�:Nr c ,n �.r ro°...,...,,�V.'". w .e .m. ,..°.A`M",a"" ,y, ro „> ..:4....w..a '"'� sxw ,-.,-•••..-...;-••:7‘...:,. �. b:.:a"., n .. .. . ,:! ^ .. w" nw. ...S.: b n.`b... ., ar 0. -»,"w,...0 o ,.. .,., ., .,(u N' < .,,. s ,... 'p>.m:, , ».,. �.:'....'..747— `9a....a.qv,£". 4« :"`` o � a • a"-,w Y:.x .,:". v, n :.,, ya^m a. , µ+y .v:.«µ ! .:... mow., ra„ ,� by ..,'(°h ..,,,:: .. 8.. ,� � e(rw µ- ,-- ' s ,k '.�» 8 a\,.vN av 9. me.:. '.::: ...r-, .� a v♦. e:,.^p. iW :.°..,, .y.:r..x x m •:.W,.. � « :.of w ..,.. M « ,: ,q.,g; ...-.„,,,,I..-,-,..,-...„....7„.:•,,,,:.•,...„,„-„,...-• .. mY °°�vm -,-'2".... "«?° .-•„. ", .- ,., w lxx,*y ,`..s<." m «.t w ., w>,e.y .N,.,N.,+ .a'-�, ,>« „s�w � w, q ° w N h -n m wm ., ,v ...„,..,....,...,:•••„,. i':♦ - W: .ro " �w.sw �'.. me' - ...,d%.,.m �'•••••„ ,ry a p.4x>oC.N'b r aot, �,wx`ti '$ Wlm,! A g4� u _ v A+t` tl� g1 w a.. w r '7',.,:.— �8' , a C b .w w t MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR LOOMISl COUNCIL MEMBER CARTER P-7›.../•/-5-n TO &�` C COUNCIL MEMBER CULVER C� f--krt\A--� �� COUNCIL MEMBER ABBOTT /" COUNCIL MEMBER DANKWERTH . -111—D COUNICL MEMBER PARISH 6.- t I, (1 FROM: CHUCK SWEET,TOWN MANAGER ' - - CAD.1,7-( t t\( DATE: FEBRUARY 2ND, 2005 SUB]: ORO VALLEY COUNTRY CLUB CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) APPLICATION —ADDITIONAL INFORMATION In addition to the addendum report by town staff that was distributed on Monday of this week, Vice Mayor Gillaspie has asked some specific questions relating to the Oro Valley Country Club application for a CUP. The attachments to this memorandum reflects the following: 1. Vice Mayor Gillaspie's e-mail &attached questions. 2. Town staff's response to Vice Mayor Gillaspie's questions. 3. WLB's faxed response to Vice Mayor Gillaspie's questions. Thank you. Chuck Sweet, Town Manager Attachments (3) C: Vice Mayor Gillaspie David Andrews, Finance Director/Acting Town Manager Brent Sinclair, Comm. Dev. Dir. Bryant Nadine, P&Z Adm. Page 1 of 1 Sweet, Charles From: Gillaspie,Barry Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2005 2:48 PM To: Sweet, Charles Cc: Parish, Terry Subject: OVCC CUP Mr. Sweet, I met with Mrs. Tearse on Saturday January 29 to listen to hear concerns regarding the conditional use permit. I number of issues were brought up that I am requesting specific answers be provided: 1. The OVCC has said numerous times that they cannot make any changes to the design. I would like concrete reasons as to why they cannot move the pool. Perhaps WLB can provide an analysis of impacts to their development. 2. It was mentioned by OVCC members that parking could not be relocated to the north of the Tennis Court. Could you get an answer on this from WLB. It looks like there may be room. If so,shifting some parking north of the tennis court could create room for the pool to be moved farther away from the Tearse residence. 3. Can you clarify if the finished grade of the pool area will be four feet higher than the current grade. 4. Will the pool wall be six feet in height or 10 ` height? I understand that the wall be 10 feet in total from existing grade but only 6 feet tall. 5. There are utilities in the drainage area. Will they be on the OVCC side or residence side of the 18'screen wall? 6. I would like to know why the pool equipment could not be located on the parking lot side of the pool versus the golf course side of the pool? This change may cut down on noise from the pumps and better screen it from the neighbor to the north. 7. I would like to know why the snack bar cannot be internal to the fitness center instead of at the north and west of the pool and potentially generating outside noise. 8. I want confirmation that there will be no outside grill allowed by the pool area. 9. I would like renderings of the 10'16'wall. It was originally shown to have offsets that would support plantings. 10. The wall if allowed at the desired location for the pool will need to have external landscaping to its north for softening. I would like engineering to work with planning to provide a recommended landscaping buffer that will work for the situation. No plantings north of the wall is not an option and engineering will need help with a solution. 11. I would like confirmation that the grading of the drainage will be done in a way to protect the mature pine trees. 12. What is the lighting plan for along the northern boundary? How will automobile lights be screened from residences to the north? The burden of proof is on the petitioner to meet the conditions for a use permit. Answers to these questions will help resolve the issue. I know this is late and I should have gotten this to you sooner. I would appreciate answers by Tuesday. Barry 2/1/2005 OV8-04-07, Oro Valley Country Club Questions/Response 1. The OVCC has said numerous times that they cannot make any changes to the design. I would like concrete reasons as to why they cannot move the pool. Perhaps WLB can provide an analysis of impacts to their development. Applicant will provide a response. 2. It was mentioned by OVCC members that parking could not be relocated to the north of the Tennis Court. Could you get an answer on this from WLB. It looks like there may be room. If so, shifting some parking north of the tennis court could create room for the pool to be moved farther away from the Tearse residence. Applicant will provide a response. 3. Can you clarify if the finished grade of the pool area will be four feet higher than the current grade. The finished grade will be approximately 4'higher. 4. Will the pool wall be six feet in height or 10' height? I understand that the wall be 10 feet in total from existing grade but only 6 feet tall. Because of the elevation difference, a 3-4'high retaining wall will be necessary with a 6' high screen wall on top. Overall, the entire wall will be approximately 9'-10'in height. 5. There are utilities in the drainage area. Will they be on the OVCC side or residence side of the 18' screen wall? It has been determined that there are utilities within the drainage easement; however, it has not been clarified on which side of the property line they are. 6. I would like to know why the pool equipment could not be located on the parking lot side of the pool versus the golf course side of the pool? This change may cut down on noise from the pumps and better screen it from the neighbor to the north. Applicant will provide a response. 7. I would like to know why the snack bar cannot be internal to the fitness center instead of at the north and west of the pool and potentially generating outside noise. Applicant will provide a response. 8. I want confirmation that there will be no outside grill allowed by the pool area. Per the neighbor agreements, there will be no permanent grill facilities permitted by the snack bar/pool area; however, it was discussed that periodically there will be portable grills with special events. 9. I would like renderings of the 10'/6' wall. It was originally shown to have offsets that would support plantings. Applicant will provide a response. 10. The wall if allowed at the desired location for the pool will need to have external landscaping to its north for softening. I would like engineering to work with planning to provide a recommended landscaping buffer that will work for the situation. No planting north of the wall is not an option and engineering will need help with a solution. The Engineering department strongly suggests that no landscaping be provided within the existing drainage easement. Because of the existing elevation and drainage patterns it would cause further drainage problems in the area. Per the neighbor agreements an additional 5' buffer would be achieved to preserve the existing vegetation along the south side of the Tearse's property. As a result of this, it was determined that there would not be adequate area for landscaping adjacent to the wall. 11. I would like confirmation that the grading of the drainage will be done in a way to protect the mature pine trees. Per the neighbor agreements, the additional 5' buffer provided on the south side of the property line will preserve the existing trees on the Tearse's property. 12. What is the lighting plan for along the northern boundary? How will automobile lights be screened from residences to the north? A lighting plan has not been proposed yet; however, per the neighbor agreements, the lighting along the north side of the property will be restricted in the pool/snack bar area and the fitness area (this has been addressed in the conditions of approval). With regards to vehicle headlight glare, a 3'-6" screen wall will be located adjacent to the parking area to minimize this nuisance (this has been addressed in the conditions of approval). Feb. � 2;�� i : 26AM N,-.), 821(3 P. 1./66 J a% Erialneering . Pluming . sur TeYRi • Urban Dacign Uroupc. , FAX TRANSMITTAL SHEET , ----.„.. ---____________ . _.......______,_. .1 1 --1 -,,, ..---- - pATE:,,,, -z_y_L___-03 6:2 . TO; r (tea FROM: _ FAX: A.2.7 ---A9p, . U FAX# (520) 881-7492 tI i COMMENTS: C = . .r- ;z. eZIL7L'a4Zej 40 11:0":4%'_ _ C 7d. 7 . , ,I. ei,._ ' ' fo,y -Z4i +• _g_______rS-- . . vin I_______________ Zeitfl,/gir-i ----- ot• ieS. - 4t67:2431 _ I • w 1 i. r4r : 0 VCC _________ .__. 1 Amor _ ........_ ,.....,......_. ___ 1 . Ai- ..-ie . _.4-5_____7u /tirlird s--- A., . Ac-.' __,--l__ZO6g:r_r_______,„et,J ___ __ ______.. 1 ,.. ' , . 1 ___ , _______________ _........._ ___1 I THERE AREA TOTAL 0 PAG , INCLUDING THE COVER PAGE. IF ALL I PAGARE NOT MEWED PROPERLY, PLEASE j tOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY ` PAGES . CALLING (320) 881-7480. 1 i ,_ PLEASE DELIVER AS SOON AS POSSIBLE EngIne ring • Planning • Surveying . Urban design • Land;oepe ArQt3itec(ure Qtilois looeted In Tucson, Phoenix, Las Voges q E•mafi: tutcsonUwibgroup.00tn 4444. east Broadway • 'Meson, Arizona 85Til .• (520) 0114480 • FAX (f20J 801.7482 E,b. 1. 1305 11 : 27AM 8210 F. 2/6 David R.or=quillr.) Tnwrt of Oro Val_e_,1 11000 N. La Tar.ada Dr. Oro valley, Ai 85737 "?,et Oro Valley Country Club ov8-04-0 / J°Jl2-04- .6 WLB No. 1O402CA-001-0100 -)avid, i'ursuant to your request we are providing herewith responses to the questions e-mailed. to us on 1/31/05: 1)The OVCC has said ntr:erous times that they cannot make any changes to the design. I would Like concrete reasons as to why they cannot move the pool. Perhaps 4;LB can provide an analysis of impacts to their deve:opo-tent. Sesponse; OVCC has never said that they cannot make charges to the design. What they have said is that this is an extrexi.el.y tight and in►ited site. They have worked hard to "shoehorn" all of the various functions orIt_o the site including a Pro-Shop, Clubhouse, Fitness Center, parking, practice area etc. The Fitness Center and swimming pool are located at the northernmost end of the site se that they are close to parking and the existing tennis courts. The Fitness Center and swimming pool are designed to attract new members and younger families. As auch they are not really an integral part of the golf experience and consequently have been placed on the periphery of the site. There have been numerous meetings with the neighbors regarding the lccat ion of the swimming pool. In fact on two occasions OVCC has voluntarily moved the pool further from the neighbors to the north. They have proposed additional Landscaping buffers and site walls to mitigate any disruptions. from the pool and Fitness Center. Cn more than one occasion O cC ;understood that it ha.d an agreement the neighbor ' only to be told later that this was "not good enough'. . Moving the Fitness Center and swimming pool at this late date would require a virtual re-design of the. entire site and buildings. It would znegotiations mauve in meet i n s atrO��lt to a zzversa�. of decisions and riey��tia��_�on.� , with both toe neighbors and Town Staff. It is simply not fair. 2) It was mentioned by OVCC members that parking could not be relocated to *► the tennis court.. Could you get an answer on this from the north of - may so, shifting ino soh.. parking LB. It. looks like there be room. Is shi t e north of the tennis cc rt could create room for the pool to be moved farther away from the Tearse Residence. Response: Creating some parking north of toe tennis courts is possible, however, . y would greatly reduce the amount of buffer in this area and negatively impact another neighbor who asked that this area be left as turf and planting as proposed. Prov_ding access to the area north of the tennis courts would in fact reduce the amount of parking :n the main parking :Lot and the net increase would be minimal. Further movement of the 'ool to the south, in conyJncticna with the audition of parking north of the tennis courts :n the end would r'esu.t in no more, and possibly less parking. Again, OVCC and their design team have explored this concept in detail and determined it's not a good idea. 2O5 11 : 27 M N). I` 3:'S i Can you clarify f the f ini s. ed grate of the pool area will be four f fEet Ache. than the current grade. Response: The proposed finish grade around the pool area will be approxin:ateiy 3.5' to 4.5' higher than the existing grade within the existing drainage Swale north of the proposed pool wall. The proposed grade is driven by the grading, paving, drainage and utility design and. is relatively the same grade as the existing practice Greens in this area 4) Will the. pool wall be six feet in height or ten feet in height? T understand that the wall be 10 feet in total from existing -rade but only 5 fee: tall. Response: The wall north of the pool area will be a 6' high screen wall 'on the pool side of the wall, the wall will be approximately 9.5' to 10.5' high from the existing grade on the drainage swale side. 5)T ere are utilities in the drainage area. will they be on the CVCC site or residence side of ;he 18' screen wall? Response: There are existing utilities within the existing 20' wide drainage and utility easement along t:le north property line. Based upon the information available to us at this time, it appears all the utilities exist south of the common property line. No new utilities are proposed by Ovc: in this area. There is no 18' screen wall. 6)1 would like to know why the pool equipment could r,of be located on the parking lot side of .the pool versus the golf course side of the pool? This change may cut down on noise from the pumps and better screen it from the neighbor to the north. Response: The pool equipment will be entirely located within a separate room at the end of the Fitness Center. Whether it is on the nor_h or the south will make no difference because the equipment is inside a room within the building. It will not e .it any noise at all. Nor wi:l the neighbor see any pool equipment f.n this location, so there is no need for screening. 7)I would like to know why the snack bar cannot be internal to the fitness cen ter instead of at the north and west or the pool and potentially generating out side noise. Response: The Snack Bar is a function of the swimming pool, not a f::,unction of the Fitr.es3 Center. In the Fitness Center, people are at work on exercise equipment or aerobbics. Following their exercise routine they may retire to the swimming pool area to have a snack, swim and relax. The entire pool area, including the Snack Bar, will be thoroughly screened from the neighbors to the north. In addition, the Snack Bar itself will be inside of its own portion of the building. The Fitness Center expansion, the Snack Bar and the swimming pool and its equipment are part of a future phase and are not part of this construction project today.. 8)1 want confirmation that there will be no outside grill allowed by the pool area. 245 ! I 2 8 rpt 'av 2 ► .; Response: It has already been agreed that no 1✓ERi1 NEl1T GRILL would he allowed. The C''CC has reserved the right to bring in a portable grill fors f-,erial functions, 9) 1 would like YFndarJ1gCof t ye 10'/6' w�� L t was originally Jhown to have of r sets that would support plantings. Response: Toss-section from the Tearses' patio through the pool area is attached In fact, the wall in question was originally shown as a straight wall located directly on the 10' easement line as permitted by OVICR. Subsequent meetings with the neighbors resulted in concessions being offered hX OVCC and revisions to the plan as it is presently shown. One of OVCC's early concessions that was offered was to provide "notches" in the wall to support vegetation. This concept seemed to appeal to the neighbor at the time. But now, changing issues and. further concerns have pushed the pool and the wall even further from the property line, to a point where there is no longer any room left for "notches" in the wall. So the wall must be straight, albeit considerably further frcm the property line than it was originally. From an engineer_ng standpoint, there can be NO plantings on the north side of :his wad a as we are proposing to solve a drainage problem that is shared by the Town. The design to accommodate this drainage solution is being assumed totally on OVCC's property in a specific attempt not to di sM urb by neighbor within the drainage/�util_ty existing vegetation plantedthe_he g , easement. Techn_esl1y speaking, this planting is not allowed in the easement, but OVCC is trying to help the neighbor save it. l0)The wall if allcwed at the desired location for the pool will need to have external landscaping to its north. for softening. I would like engineering to work with planning to provide a recommended landscaping buffer that will work for this situation. No plantings north of the wall is not an option and engineering will Teed help with a solution. Response: See response to #9,abolre. 11;I would like confirmation that the grading of the drainage will be done in a way to protect the nat:zre pine trees. Response: The OVCC Building Committee and the Contractor will take great care in constructing the proposed drainage swale so as not to damage the existing vegeta tion that is encroaching on the recorded drainage/utility easement. 12)What is the lighting plan for along the northern boundary? How will autonoile lights be screened from residences to the r=th? Response: As agreed to at the meeting including Town Staff, CVCC and concerned neighbors on 1/13/C5, the following represents the resulting solutions: A. Nc exterior lights along the north side of the pool equipment room. B. is lights within the pool area above 6 feet in height, excluding unde:water lighting (code requiremen t) and low voltage ground lighting that will be required to define the pool area. $ FL 1 05 11 :2OM 8210 F. 5'5 . - C. Al.? exterior aighting cn the north side of the Fitness Building shall be 1,Inder canopy lighting. Automobile light screening has also already been resolved by locating the required .3' 4"screen wall directly adjacent to the 4 parking spaces that are remaining alone the nor.th. Additonally it has teen agreed to provide the required landscape buffer just to the north of and adjacent to the screen wall, Parking lo; lighting has not been developed at this time, nowever, we will have ----) adhere to the lightinc code as required by the O.V.Z.C.S. Please con--..a:t me or Patrick Steffel if you have any questions or comments. Sincere' eve Oliverio Project Manager The WLB Group,Inc. cc:Vice Mayor- Barry Gillespie Peter Carli-OVCC Patrick Steffe1-0VCZ: Bruce Erickson-ELA Mike Franks-Seaver.Fran.Ks F [r. Ic��1� 11;99tier . •• lye' 8210 P. 6/6- . 1 . . \ \ Ds1,,,,,. . . • • • . • ••, - \ut - .,_%-,- ' . 1 r: . . • - • - - • ': - - , • • • : : : : : . : .