HomeMy WebLinkAboutPackets - Council Packets (1125) AGENDA
ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL
STUDY SESSION
NOVEMBER 29, 2004
ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
11,000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE
STUDY SESSION: AT OR AFTER 4:30 PM
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
1. DISCUSSION AND REVIEW OF COMMUNICATION WITH CITIZENS
2. DISCUSSION AND REVIEW OF COMPREHENSIVE ZONING CODE
REVISIONS
3. PRESENTATION OF TOWN'S CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND
PROCESS
ADJOURNMENT
The Town of Oro Valley complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
If any person with a disability needs any type of accommodation, please notify
the Oro Valley Town Clerk, at 229-4700
POSTED: 11/24/04
4:30 p.m.
Ih
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 1
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: November 29, 2004
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Council
FROM: Bob Kovitz, Public Information Officer
Kevin Verville, Information Technology Administrator
SUBJ: Communicating with Citizens
BACKGROUND
At its September 27, 2004, Special Session, the Town Council discussed a proposal
that had been brought forward by Council member Dankwerth—a periodic "report to the
citizens" that would be included as an insert in the Water Utility bills. The cost about
$1,000 per quarterly insertion was not supported by the Council. Instead, the Council
gave direction to place an item on a Study Session agenda for further discussion of
methods for communicating with the citizens.
DISCUSSION
There are numerous ways that the Council may choose to communicate with citizens.
Some of these are already in place or in process. Others would require a funding
commitment from the Council and a staff resource commitment from various
departments or divisions.
These methods include:
1. Inserts in Town-wide Water Utility billings (as per Council member Dankwerth's
original suggestion).
These inserts would be limited in content and size so that they would not cause an
increase in postage. In addition, some of the inserts would have to be sent separately
at the first class rate since not all local residents are customers of the Oro Valley Water
Utility. Finally, the Town would be competing with other organizations (e.g., GOVAC)
for insert space in the bills.
Estimated cost: $1,000 per quarter
2. Web logs (or "blogs"), as suggested by Council member Gillaspie.
A "blog" is a relatively new form of communication. It is, in essence, a kind of electronic
diary where the writer may share information or opinions on various subjects. Certainly,
each Council member could choose to create his or her own blog, but it would require
the Council member to actively update it in order to make it valuable to the reader. In
addition, the availability of the blog would have to be marketed so that the citizens knew
where to find it on the Internet. Finally, each Council member would need
to exercise caution in writing his or her own blog to make certain that it is understood
that opinions expressed are solely those of the member and not of the entire Council.
See Attachment of a sample blog from Santa Barbara, CA. Most municipal-government
oriented blogs (like this one) are written by people who want to comment on the actions
of a town or city council. A quick Google search did not turn up any blogs written by
local elected officials themselves.
Estimated cost: $0
3. Newsletter and Community Calendar, as proposed in the 2004-05 budget.
The 2004-05 budget request from the Town Manager's office included the development,
publication and mailing of a quarterly consolidated events calendar (including programs
from the library, parks and recreation, GOVAC and other departments). The calendar
would have also allowed for two extra pages to use as a newsletter to share other
information with citizens.
Estimated cost: $16,000 per quarterly issue. This line item was eliminated when the
Council gave direction to the Town Manager to reduce proposed expenditures to
balance the budget against anticipated revenues.
4. Access Tucson
At the request of the Council, Comcast Cable has added public access channels 73 and
74 to its lineup of channels that are received by Oro Valley subscribers. As a result, the
Town Council has been invited to participate in the "Government Connection" program.
This 30-minute broadcast may feature both interview and call-in formats; the segment is
aired live at 6:30 p.m. on Wednesday nights on Channel 74, and then repeated
throughout the week.
It is important to note that these broadcasts will only reach those citizens who have
Comcast Cable service, although the programs are also available via Access Tucson's
website. In addition, the number of dates and times available to Oro Valley is limited.
Estimated cost: $0
5. Listing of Council votes by agenda item, as suggested by Vice Mayor Abbott.
The Town Clerk's office posts the votes along with each agenda item on the Clerk's
website within a few days after each regular or special Town Council meeting. This
post does not indicate which member voted in favor or opposed to each specific item,
only the number of votes.
The minutes with the recorded votes are not posted until they are approved by the
Council at a subsequent meeting. This means that there may be a 2-6 week lag time
before they are posted on the Clerk's website. Therefore, if a citizen wishes to know
how a particular Council member voted on a specific issue, he or she would have to
contact the Clerk's office to obtain that information in advance of the approved minutes
being posted.
The Town Clerk could be instructed to post the votes along with the names of the
Council members when the Council's actions are posted a few days after each meeting.
[Periodically, the Arizona Daily Star will contact the Public Information Office to ask how
the Council members voted on a particular issue, and the Star will publish that
information in a "How They Voted" column. This column, however, does not run on a
regular basis, and it usually focuses on only one issue per jurisdiction].
The Council may want to give careful consideration to directing the Clerk to post the
names of the Council members along with the votes. While the inclusion of the names
does give the citizens more information, the Council members' reasons for voting the
way that they did would not become apparent until the actual minutes are posted weeks
later. As the Council is aware, many of the issues that come before the Council are
complex; they may also contain constraints where mere posting of the votes and
Council members' names would not reflect the complexity of the issues, amendments to
the motions or the discussion that took place before the votes.
Estimated cost: $0
6. Listserve ("O-Mail")
The Town is nearly ready to launch its first subscription Listserve subscription program.
By subscribing to the list, the citizens will automatically receive information about
whatever subjects are of interest to them. The Listserve will not cause the Town to
create any more documents than already exist. Types of information that might be sent
out include: press releases, maps of upcoming public works projects or activities,
recreation, parks and library programs, meeting agendas and minutes, employment
opportunities, neighborhood watch and crime prevention information. The Listserve
would also alert citizens where there are new items on the Town's website by providing
a link to the new information.
Attached is a sample of what the sign-up page might look like. In addition, we have
attached some sample pages from the City of Tempe, which has a much more
extensive Listserve program.
Subscribers will be able to add or subtract to their subscription topics whenever they
please, and they may also cancel whenever they please. The subscribers will be
required to provide their e-mail addresses, and there will be assurances that the e-mail
addresses will not be shared or sold to any third party.
Internally, the Town will designate a person who will make the final decision whether a
specific "0-Mail" will be sent to the subscribers. This will ensure that accurate and
timely information is being distributed.
Once the Listserve program is underway, the Town should be committed to maintaining
and supporting it on an ongoing basis. This means that there will be continuous
marketing efforts (via the Town website, other media and "stuffers" in Town
correspondence) to let citizens know about "0-Mail."
Cost: $0
7. Streaming video of Town Council meetings
The Council has expressed a strong interest in video broadcasts of its meetings. In
addition, the University of Arizona study that was done for the Town in 2003 indicated
that over 2/3 of the respondents said that they would watch broadcasts of the Town
Council meetings if they were available. (Sample size=750; respondents =147
[19.6%]).
There is sufficient technology available to provide streaming video of the Council
meetings via the Internet (to be accompanied by the streaming audio already in place).
A small stationary camera would be installed at the back or side of the Council
chambers. The picture from the camera would include the Council, the staff, the
podium speaker's and the projection screen. However, the quality of the picture would
be low since the stationary shot must be taken from far away to include everyone. In
addition, the broadcast of the video itself will appear as a small box on the typical
computer screen. Since the camera is stationary, the content of the video broadcast
may not make it significantly more valuable than the current audio broadcast.
Streaming audio would only be available to citizens with computers and Internet service.
The streaming video would work best for Internet users who have broad-band or DSL
connections to the Internet. It would not work well for users with dial-up connections.
And, the video would not be available for viewing on television.
Cost: $1,000 — 2,000 (equipment and software)
8. Videotape of Council meetings by Access Tucson
Access Tucson has offered to videotape the Town Council meetings for later broadcast.
We are determining what the cost would be for the service, and when the tapes would
be shown on Comcast local access stations. Clearly, this is not the same as a live
broadcast or a live video/audio feed over the Internet. And, of course, only subscribers
to Comcast would have the opportunity to view the video. Access Tucson would, most
likely, provide a 3-camera set-up and the staff or volunteers to operate the cameras.
Cost: Unknown at present time
9. Live Council Broadcast Required in Cable Franchise
The Town and Comcast Cable Communications are now within the 3-year window
proscribed for renegotiation of the franchise agreement. When the original agreement
was approved in 1997, there were no provisions included for local access programming
or broadcasts of Town Council meetings or other community events.
The Town will most likely seek these elements when the new franchise is negotiated.
10. Continued outreach by Council members to organized groups in the community
The Council can commit to continuing to make its members available to groups in the
community (such as homeowner's associations, civic organizations, PTO's, faith-based
groups) to discuss general or specific issues. The Town is already represented by
Council members at the Sun City Vistoso Government Affairs Committee meetings.
This model could be duplicated throughout the Town. It would be appropriate to
arrange these visits through the association management companies (e.g., Lewis
Management, Cadden Management) and to rotate the opportunities among all of the
Council members. Staff may be available to accompany the members, depending on
the issue and the times and dates of the meetings (particularly if they're in the evenings
when staff may already be committed to other meetings).
The Town has also required that the Farmers Market make tables available for civic
purposes. Town Council members could rotate Saturdays and could make themselves
available to the public at an "Ask the Council member" table at the Farmers Market.
Cost: $0
11. Purchase of advertising space in a community newspaper
The Town Council may wish to consider purchasing space in a local newspaper. The
space would be used to publish a "report to the citizens" regarding recent Council
actions or Town activities.
Theurchase of advertisingspace would (a) guarantee that the information would
p p
appear, and (b) would give the Town control over the content of the information.
However, not every citizen receives every newspaper, and those that do may not read
the advertising. Furthermore, both the Explorer and the NW section of the Arizona Daily
Star are delivered to many customers outside of the Town. Therefore, the Town would
be paying an advertising rate based on readership that includes non-Oro Valley
residents.
If the Town does purchase advertising space, the Council would have to determine if
the space would be used strictly to publicize Town information (such as Council
agendas or votes on various agenda items) or whether it would contain "editorial"
content, such as commentary from the Mayor or Council members.
Cost: Variable, depending upon size and frequency of ad. For example, the
Northwest Explorer's rate for a weekly 1/3 page ad = $410 per week or $485 for every
other week. The rate for a '/2 page ad = $540 per week or $620 for every other week.
Those rates are scheduled to increase by 7-10% on January 1, 2005, to reflect the
wider circulation of the Explorer . The 2004 rates would be honored if the Town were to
enter into a contract with the Explorer prior to December 31, 2004.
12. Submission of guest editorial or column in a community newspaper
Both the Arizona Daily Star Northwest Edition and the Northwest Explorer have proven
to be very agreeable to printing guest editorials. These columns allow the writer to
expand on issues at greater length than the traditional "letter to the editor" format. The
Council could approach the newspapers to express an interest in submitting such
columns on a monthly or quarterly basis.
Cost: $0
RECOMMENDATION
That the Council continue to pursue no-cost, low-cost methods of sharing information
with Oro Valley citizens through the use of above options #4 ("Government Connection"
program on Channel 74) ,# 5 (posting of Council votes by Council member name), #6
("0-Mail" Listserve), #10 (Council outreach to citizen groups) and #12 (guest editorials
and columns).
If the Council wishes to pursue any of the other methods, direction should be given so
that funding and other arrangements may be included as part of the 2005-06 budget
process or department work plan.
411
Bob Kovitz, Public Informati n Officer
Kevin Verville, Information Technology
Administrator
i
Chuck Sweet, Town Manager
Attach: A. Extract of minutes of September 27, 2004, Town Council Special Session
B. Sample Listserve webpage
C. City of Tempe Listserve options
D. Sample blog-Santa Barbara, CA
Extract of Minutes Town Council Special Session, September 27, 2004
DISCUSSION AND/OR IMPLEMENTATION OF "A REPORT TO CITIZENS"
Public Information Officer Bob Kovitz reviewed his Council Communication stating that
in August 2004, Council Member Dankwerth had requested exploring the possibility of
creating a periodic report to the citizens of Oro Valley. These reports would highlight
actions taken by the Council and would be included in the Water Utility bills. Mr. Kovitz
explained that a memorandum was sent to the entire Council asking for further
direction. To date, two members have responded — one in favor of proceeding and the
other suggesting alternative methods to providing the same information to the Town's
gg g
residents. The cost of printing and inserting a report would total about $750.00.
However, he noted that the Water Utility has customers outside of Oro Valley, and that
Oro Valley has residents who are not customers of Oro Valley Water. Therefore, those
latter residents would have to receive the insert as a separate mail piece, printed on
heavierp a er stock and mailed at the first class rate if there are less than 500 such
p
residents or property owners. The Finance Director has identified the General
Administration account as a source of funding for the entire project. During the 04/05
budget reduction deliberations, funding for a quarterly Town-wide activities calendar and
newsletter was removed. Therefore, a funding source needs to be identified if the
Council wishes for this project to move forward. He stated that it will also be necessary
to reserve space in future Water Utility bills since other organizations also place inserts
into the water bills. Therefore, the cost for postage would increase if additional inserts
are included.
Mr. Kovitz asked for clarification regarding who would be responsible for approving the
final draft of the insert. He stated that one council member's opinion of what constitutes
an important action by the Council may not be the same as another council member.
Given the limited space available on the insert, someone would have to be given
ultimate responsibility for determining what is included. He indicated that it would be
advisable for the entire Council to express support for this project so that the inserts
reflect unanimity of purpose, regardless of whether a council member voted in favor or
were opposed to the specific actions that are highlighted in the inserts.
Council Member Gillaspie pointed out that the area not served by Oro Valley Water is
larger than just "Area B" annexation area. It also includes Shadow Mountain Estates
East and West. Therefore, this will affect the proposed costs. He also commented that
if the pamphlet does not come in someone's water bill, but is delivered by "bulk" mail,
may not read it. But he agreed that it is an opportunity to get information out to
people
the residents. He asked about possibly creating a Town "Blog" page that would allow
citizens to have an open forum on issues over the internet.
Council Member Culver suggested that this report be done by e-mail or on the Town's
web site. Pamphlets could also be available at the Library or at Town Hall. She stated
that then there would be no restriction on the amount of information that could be put in
thep amphlet as there would be if the pamphlet were inserted into the Town's water bill.
She agreed that it is important to get the information out to the public, but she asked
that staff explore other ways that may be more cost efficient before Council considers
authorizing the expenditure of $4,000 per year.
Council Member Parish agreed that using the water bill was a great idea and he
suggested advertising the Town's website address on the water bill directing the citizens
to the Town's website to get further information. He thought this may be a way to save
the Town money and at the same time, make the information available to the citizens.
Discussion followed on the best way to get the information out to the citizens, whether
or not they have a computer.
Mr. Kovitzp ointed out that the U of A Graduate Study regarding how to get information
to Oro Valley, indicated that 60% of the respondents read the material included in their
water bill.
Council Member Dankwerth stated that she would consider backing off of a quarterly
newsletter to 3 times a year and incorporating Council Member Parish's idea of
incorporating the Town's website address on the water bills directing them to the Town's
p 9
website for further information.
Mayor Loomis asked about the timeliness of the information, frequency and selection of
the items. He pointed out that in the past the Town has tried multiple methods including
Town pages in weekly newspapers, promoting the webpage, e-mails, etc. He
suggested doing more work to decide on what message Council is trying to send.
MOTION: Mayor Loomis MOVED to continue this item to a future study session in
November or December. MOTION SECONDED by Council Member Parish.
DISCUSSION. Vice Mayor Abbott asked staff to see how much paper it would require
to do a consolidated list of minutes listing each council member's name and vote. This
would be inclusive. Based on that they could decide if it is too much information or not.
Mayor Loomis suggested that Council provide their ideas to Bob Kovitz before it comes
back to a study session.
MOTION carried 7 — 0.
In an effort to keep you informe Page 1 of 2
'::............r f...: ....,..... .... . ....:... .:..: ... :.•.. ... xi ..,y `� %'''/Y.•-,,,,-..*41$1111.61:1111
...✓.•'++}.k r'/'r33yy/l`", Y.:1F:;
...... ....... ... :. .:.... ............ .. ...::....... .. ... :......... ...5 '4`.•H59E9ffl+^' :.x,/;?:'S{. ..;i..::df.:f :.4«4#..x•:;
...... ...r.r........:. J.rr.m.r....r.r..v :.,............. .....rr r - , ......":....-. .... ..:........... w{4 y� :fC�:4:•?' ,:^.G'd:•?:JY-:,:r::n v.. ...Y'F�.
..r........»..r.n. , ....x... v. ... ......r....r ................. .....................:....... .. ................. yf;�/4r a�J r../.v ..F�'�!i.` ..vJ:..:r....`Y•/:r2n:i:!-:
!' r:ir r r...... .............. .. ....:.................:. .._....................... .,✓.w.f•::.w•-f+nU}.;^4%•F �> r.F.t..
. v.r
.... .W .5':....,�. ........ .. ............. .... ,...............2,......r .r....:.....:...n...:..;....:::: .9 r.S v:..., :.L 1. !.YY•?:
n...r .n:r. ....rx.. ......... ..... ....... :..'{✓.�:::r::nvn:!4?.., SS:}i>+F:SS:vSlf:i?f...
.r. ... ..x... ... ..... ............. ....... ...................... ..v:ni:t:v J :r:4 .:•/r it{?•::5"r:a {:.:G!-{.:'i:n?:
. ....r. :........ :,.........,......,...:. .............................................r.n.n:............,-:.ar:...rx.:::.i:.,,r...5r•.n.,.., a;fi�!. f.:..:;;c!::•,>itt.}::.....:
......r..r...:nr:. .i~�.".'.n.. .. .....,.... .... ..:........,•.............. ................._.......r........... .............,....................,r 4r:cl v 6 :F-frr•rx•::v....r .;.,✓1.!.
,,,,rr��,,�vr .. nff.. .. ».,!......,;.,n^.>: !.::C+Y"i::.{vv`vi'vS'
.... rF..... r .. N,n... .. .m n r r...... v.......................r.r..... .......................... :, .././ ! ..:xt-Y..xrYti{i::�Qf...
.... ...r r r n...Y.c.n.6.. ,. ................... ...... ...»...../....... ..........,................. »•n•N..� �w.., S.✓..... r.} f..
,.r:... Rt.r!f, :.»............ .....:...».r....r... .,. .......w......................... ..::::•,.;...{..r.:yYf•;• ».�:: .?F..:.r.v
xw rXf.r.. ......... .....r.. ........:....,:.:::::.. .....r x.::T.......+.x Y:!•:.. r.t`.x
.....a,.. ..,,k Ar....... u..:..r.....,n.r...:. .r.........:....r. .. ............ .. .A.r:9. �{J. :f,.. :n.Yd.''•:`r'!
, r.v.b ........ ....,..r..r ..r........ .................... ... : .r...:,F,....r., :S+SSii?+:.A�/�t�23`;:,?:a:
"FrL ...,.... ..L,• ,::: t..... r,... ,.r.................................... .., ..4.. :f. ti:rlt'.} a....r.•FYr.. ...h
r.:. ..::.. .r r... ... r..r..:......n.r.......... ..:...4.f.. : ..r.,..r. .. :.r rr,.? ... .. ,,WW F%?
..... ... .. .... :...r v.. ........r. J vR.r..F.v......\.n. ........r.............. .,3. •.41.{ ,.,k<,. •}•[UfS.,:
... r....a'Sr .T�". .[.n/,.,...,.Fr..r.r .................. .,.r......,xx ...:.n ..... .! ?.... .rF Y+}-::2`Y:`:fi%y:
aft. L. ..r... .....r.r...r.•s...9...,/ r:.:....::...:..�::!:::.......r..r.n........n:•..,.,. •. rY :..:Y. :..:tfi/i' J:k"i:``.• n:.u..••.•::•l::.r..Y:^t•..rC..<:
... ........[..... ri .......... .�. ..�v.,.,...a,.....n ...r.. ., .... ...., r.,. r.......... .... r.T. .r.,. r. .:�}+tr: ,.�l•3' :f:S. '.5:4
J.r. ........r...-. F. r.» .......... ...�.v.r,c'cr».� ..r.. ..r. ., rn:.f.x. ... '7....r rt {� .cY:..,3: {i. � .3'r�+F<
':. Q.: : ,c.c. ...• F4, .rT....:„+f r .........:....,..n.!.:,�x::.n..:....:..:•:r:.:...•..:..:.. .,a y A.r r.:dw .r..!•:rc}•..: ...w :::F4.4:.:.... 4..+Y•:,.•;.:Qr:
. r.... .....t. ...:*. .......5: .. ....,r.f:. 4 w... .. a .f., rJ•./,..14.... ..it>.r..r"` - .i '4.n. F %{v`J
. :' : ...... F ...,1\• .... .....nA..../r.Y.. vv.i....r ..r .. ri. .r ^A',• ..F. . x•GJ,:a:..•%Y••, rvr•r.•.»:• .n3!i. n:b
. ...r : '•zt., f. ... n#. .Y•.x...,M... .,v.., r.•! .. .......:r:.}}n{......:..:.... ::nr.;...,++ ..Y.. :.� •F^J. n3 !fid:..k
: .u.....:r. r ........... ....:. r..,• .. ,.r ...., n+ ...5<..r.............. ,...,;.:...: :n,,..,, ...,.1M: �m,,. ..l ! ..R 4::x•: ✓. •.}Y
} , ...,..::: n %.....: , r. :.J.. fiS'. ...v]v..,S x.?,4i .... r.....r7" :- +:<•r}. n
v. r..r......... ....: .......... 4 .,.. r r. : r1..)..................,..r:::::.v..x..v..t.x......::.:.v. ,., :.
..� .4.9'f n. ...r .. .£>{. :b .r :'.�r.,... ...:.nr:.rg.,�. .f .........................., ''-i4: •:S'.3%�fi :{.4.•:;}•:�:•. .,.'C.., :?:;�::
.... ............, ...... ..... r r ..:.u�.,n{Y:,F H ,:...v F n .°S'.. .................. !{. x.R.»}.a{r3 KK'4 rpr:f:. + ..,`t:< :fiu. .t:.,..
.. a. .r.xr.. .,M....!.r.r .: ..�4r Jy, .... .. ...r•r. ..k. .:L�fr
...... .. Y .n ,r,:n.,........ ,...........,........r........,...,........n:.::• .. L r..�..,fr.... .n.. ::.•is:x ....,.:�>Y».,:.q. fly.. }
, .. .:L .....�...r{l.'a Rar v .,cy.n..r....r.............................. ........r......v.,..,...
.:..... '3�,th .,......... .,..S.rr.r:r.w ...r......J ,•. � x.rl/'+xe'.,.f..r,....,. ..,. r..1�.• :n ... .,•:£•;£c.
r...Q r. •�• ,......................�.::....:.......r.r ,.. ::.::,x.n»••.x+:u-...x•r.�.::!,r� n:. ,.,..:
.ci .:. :: ........ r...... �.... ..r tn...r.. a•.. x r..... ..,A.......... ...... ,..4....r:.3...4�.f. ... rS• yy�� .X}'r.. �!.::::s.' ..1.. ,rx><53Yr:•�rw'��.Fl��
:. ....Y ..r, ., .. ....b.....n/ .. .G,. »U .. ...................,.... ....... /.:.4.Nh.. tarx.rr •!3,R}?+i n::!. ..{...v.'3••::E`•..i''
.. ......... ..... .f rzf•F.v%.....x r n. .. 3,.....r.:.. '3 +�....:...... /... }. .r;. +•Fr}f/w ,.✓., ...t.. :.S!::..,.....i: i
.::... .....F+y 4.:...r 3JJ n ..» ..r.....,.... ...........r.......r,.........::...r..,.in;•;•'•..:.r...::::!t5•.:::r..1aa{., ,?v.t ..A..:
.. / .. n..n .............:... .. ....r ..r..+.rn Y.3'own.�4........ y r:............::::....,r................. .}:r•: rkf.�..•^ w�'...tn,;•;:•::;
.. .. 7 .. ....:. .. ..r....f.F.:#...:..X .4...r..n r../ .:.........r.... ...... ..n.. .f..../ .$:)'+. } :•.,4 v. .'r:.l..r.w,!x::vnra:nii!:r in-.:N.,•i.:{:•::
.v. .. ..![ .r., ............,:v tr n....�1.f....r:....,.r n r,C'. ..... ..,.r... .:........................... .v!:n•: ..tE}" .{x'r:i .lF.
:... .✓# Gx :.. ....4Y... .... .. .R .....n,.,.. l ... f l rY.... ......r::!ri:. ....5r:n!.:.... �:..'�..
r..n v .v.G4,v:
...,r. ..ts. .....::.....ry.. r.,.,..Q ,r .x......... fY-,3. ..,zx ....c,•
... n..r... ......,•...fiv......x. ....., ... ..:.5 k. ^ .K '�Cx...,...!r:.... 11,1,11141110r110:4111001,11Miliiii,
......:....... ..,};::!,}},}}+}Y•?•:•}}i•�::^::r.. .4'�,4
.. / ..:..d.. » .. ....f... ...... ..... r.}. .... ..................... .5.. x•i!• -r'vY': ,;H, »xis»fYt
F r. ...... � .#..�:E•..... .::........ .. ..r.,.. ...... ., »...n.Y.:rn nn.,..fes .<! �',•R�.4. .r ........ ,3..?+:$:%':dor}... r .:N.
.. ..., . ... .... ...::.. ... w...... .rr..r ..:........., rr�C .. ::rr�:r-::. .}}Ya' ... :%!4`..!r;�{>:!✓... ..G-'!5:r:...t„+:..t
.:. n.. .. .F .`+r'� :n J11y
.., rr. ....,•....,.. r... ,•.:.,vrF»: F,....
... r. ., .. . ... ............. .d....... .# A ... .... ...... . .,., . . .: ..r N:r .r r.L. .. ..f� r.. V.r:� r r ./.3:.. r.k'..4.....3.6..r .
.......n ....',. t..... .f. r .}+Dr
. ..:^.15w�...:. ..5.. r •. .... .. ..x.N.... ./.:n ... {in'< .. .. ... ...n...F...i..%,..... .r..,r. ..r.n.” .n.....,9 rfr...W. ,:..,. ..!:: ...r.. .:. .. .... ......... n.r:.....r .�2............. 24... • . :... r..Yct.t r. .. : ;i:";'�..........:... : .v... ... r. ....n.......... ...;9S . .. •::n...:......... r.Y.}..r:: ... :r .... .. .....r.F... ..., 't..::...Jr.... . :.......: x,..nr. ::....n.........:. ..:......... . .. ........... .+:..t... . r;:. :„..:. ..,,,. .,.,r.. . .. .. :.. :4:: :!:•:v::,r... �...:,:. ..... .::.:..:. ..' .A•a. .,..........::............... :.:. -.... .....: �::.r............ •x..r. .r..r»r............,..... .... ... .. !:. .... .i..n, ..............: '. ..........,.. ... .,..... : ...... . �.. .,;:, rr...:..::.,............. ... 4. ..:........ l..'•rn...,.... . .r rr. r:..:...., n.......:.�. .: .�:.:. .:. .:,•,•;.:n.:?.::. »::. :...... �.r ... .. :..... ...... ..N. .r.:.r....... . r:... .............. ..n. :. :Y::'. ....r. .{..... .. ..:: ...... r..r....f...... ..:.. .,.. .......,.,:.. ..... r..k. ....,.. ...rr...:.....». ....... ... ..r..... ...... ........' ... ......... : .x. .... ....r. ;r.... . •...... :........ .:,....... •:.: .....:. ::. :.n•:...... ....... ........Ji.,..... ....n...r...:r..... r...v... ...... ................. .....,..r. ::.... a...... .A n.....r........... ..........w... .. � .n................/n.... ........., ..../... .,:�.. v:}r-r+../..r..r:.
fi. ,.v x... ...x .f:4:
.r..... r.. r..•ht. ,.......,.r f.. .. . .a... ........r .r..v ..................,.........n... ...:........................ ..................r...,.. ... .:�.:�rf.N,..r.r£.r..r..7Kr}Yx'ri'Si':43?:ST:r:.:}::r�:::rrF�:
.... .. ... .}r. n,...::. ..n.. . � ....» ...... :........... / ..:..... ,...�.:.. .:r}:rrr::»nv;.F n:::/...:::::,:
. ........./. .. :4'}Y .+x...... :.......r.r.,,,rr.rr...+.: ....->. ... .:.:..:.... . ..vv: .Y._�. xlr:�v3!�' r4n..
............. . r..v .,r.....r.F..✓...r.i:..r n.a./.r3n,vre•.G..ir..F. .r .... ......::......f...........,r.. ........r........... +.fF{•%.::�:.:,F,..f{.Y!;;•?:4•'.:y.
��� ..... .r................r..,... ....✓..rn .,.X./ r» .. .,r {r r .. .. r:•aP� .:.1'++:•O.. ...u.t.
............. ...,.•.J,Q.a h .... ...,. ...Y. rr.... .r. ...... ri!Y2rr,n�:^:::•r...:.,.
:. fi ..v x4r/,n.r r..r... n.r.....1........n... ....n..........r..r. .. .:.::. .. ... -: ':< / 4. :!ai.::r.::/.:r?:!:.•:?•{n}!;v:r:
�' .v...... .n..C.F f .....r..r A'+" .r...:...r..... ... ........-S. ....Y rr.........r.... ...:: .. ;. ..... F .:. ..' f,n :./,!r....:.rr:.:•r
r:'
\ u� Y 4"
.. .:.........:. ........... ................... .L ..:..�.: .. .............. -::::. .. ...::: r {:::f:i:::;::;;:{%:iii:s:
r .. .... ..... .............r.. ... w...../li ..... ...........71;..... ..:::::.:...:...... ... '::R::ii�.,SF„2JrCffsµ::.::r:.
.....,... ..... ..........r. ............... -. .:.d...... ..... ..rvr........... r..v... /}'{•\:a rR.,.; F :::f33:?:[3f:<;::.�:
... ......... .. ..w......... .. ........:::....:. ....:....nV.vS :,44: LLLILIL..�':?/-:�
�" .. r... ........... .�. r� ..,.. t!•...x .. .....}.. ..+h....!ttx,:n+:A/. [ v•,•,.a'!i
y w. �,t [ryr
; .,. .no3.,4., ...r... ✓' ...::... .nE ......r........... .....:. }^S.. .... :r'£ .fr.. ::.,.....R:. ��}�{'� . ..43c'
_.. , r . ..r<..,.... .. ....'k'... .b. ..a ....... .... .::..... ..x- ,`�. .v-. /:.:3�xr -.4vPfi+{?�.�:�(i��--. i.�:'
.. ...4Y N r.. r .. ... .. ..,.. ... ..r. .r......./.f/...�.:"i:" Y:'.. / !.d:�' t:'•Y?.
:. �. .... r.,7.....r.... ?�.. ..<...... r... ... f.... .. ... .:r r. 5. 's ..4 'y 'J•r- :{�".. ./•:
.... .. F. .... ... .........r.G.... r. .. ..711' r r .. ... r. ...b.. kr
�. .. $� .. P%.?19Y,r :.: .. .. ...r y ..,, r... .:r ...:;. .:. ..df Z:. :>.. '•4r:�r�+•
y /�t qq i.
... ......L ........F.. ..:.... ... n.. .....:..�.rr....'/.:}R•r .. Jfr�.l.< .f... .li.. ,.'!�6./'-.Y.'i •} ..}S.. +\-. U
.n.:J .. Yr:r......n: J9..k.�:... :... ........... ... F.../rp.,.�, .•r..r .✓ fJ�-:Fr. ..f ,n .4.,
4,1111101114;116"kw'.,r.<F..�yFr.,f- it........, ..r.: .rb.rf..n. /:::r "wNxrf.. v.i..... r r ... ....v, ..:n ./.,.::.i: .: r:i:4: ..1 .:..\v}"`, :�K•.... .... .,...n.r .: .r .n .. ...4... ..x, .r:..4r .. .. ..F. . / ..,,,rr./.•r ,y ..\. q...........3 4.../:. .............. .. .., , n. .. ! : .. r!H. ... .F. ...,.�• ' .: ,. '.:i',M ila4F.r ::i......... b:.»...... r...... ........... ...0.. J!'. .r. ..r n rcr.. ..a,....Y.k�....•,!G.4.:?i" .::ii%;..•/ vl'•...r....Y..r.n.rL... .. ............. ..... .. ...I r .A.. ...: F 1. .t.. J J.r ..X`. _...q,..,...... n....... ..,.4:.... �.E•r"'•f .r f/ ..:' 4.... .< ., x•i f ,;,s'.r ...:..r n...:. .. ..,. .,.!.r ........,.. : .fi.f .. F r. f�..,�J. .... .'F` r,ln} �4-
.. �a .. rrn.! -., r.r .. :r.,.v:rr:.:.rr n ::.r.... n.::.:4„:rAF:.»rr..' '�n.rl 'jaLS. ";:\ ../. ir.. ,•.... n.r..r. .r,.;XF!.:., .rrQ.... :... .:... .... .. ., r,: i. rh,, ..n. ../r./!`�� 11ir arrc, i97�. �}.?'r�}�.. r. n fi..: A....... .n... .... r ... F....../.. /�. r.r.n.r.... +vf.::. ..,:r•r...rrr.4:r:...rn.. $........} :.dt .�.�+. ..,..rJ•. ... .:.r ...•.. r .<. �-l:.i- F4:]fd-e-,. ...1'. ..4..: r..M'.r... .. r n.d.rJfrr ...n .. r.. ,wr/ .. r.,.. T:..... ,. r. �'rY .:.CFOr. c+.F+r ,-- ..hY' > %Y .:J.:v:'w..v .{•rr..a:... ...,.... { ...rr... / y ., r......w..r. ,.Yn.r...r....r. .:r ::..:..:' .;./.+%.. �l:n... ,....., .SrA.....r.../1 rr . ..ri ..... r. r rF.. : ... r. ... ...JY...:N 5 ��_+y (��r....n. ...r. .....,.:.,.r. r.:.//»rr. .FR.x z r..... rr ..r...r..r }?bZ.�,.._r, ».5!+r»...r .J� `.... 4 ._r./�'-,../fi.7a. ... f v.. .... . ....N. .....Y,f... J r. �. r.Y -:.:•..f 4r ..✓.. +ra{ ,/ :fr,r•:,'r'�'' %.r..''.Y•- :'6 :&•.... .. r..r.f,..xF ....... '..n . .J'� :r-,!. .,.. .. �.. n..r.: /f ♦ ( w[.. p,�;;3r yy,,�,,,...: ... ....... ... ......r }^ r. .+xm..r rr.. .�� . .{!fl .�✓.;Av,x+- 1. :-/.4[4'.: :/ R{ j6 •,�.. /.r. ,.r.....r...r fi q rY ... .nr. n :t��rv.:f4!:•/.,-.at... ' %'' ..� 8.._
... .r.....?l. r..,r.:.. ..... ., r.�'//..vY. r ... r. /..aJry/ `J'i. :r}Sl!r Jr:
/ .. r ....rn r. .. : ..r r w....., ..: � r...r. .. 4 .. v:•:.:>'•Sv iiLt"i' f.• ::f r. ":'}.''::i'' '�•
r.
/r.rr ..,..r Jar..r. � �' : .n.r .. .. ,... /. r.r�`'.../...r�..:. .n..Y: r. ': :::<i�::,r
:..... ><:.r r ,....r. .........n,. .yn}r r. ., � .... .. ..3!:.r .:.J...... .. f.... .1tr. ,.. r .' .�4....�.T�:i ::,r..rf:::�::::::
.n. ...f.r. .....}.. + tl:...........r'ir/.r r. r .FD?..r N........:rrr..r. r r x. y.{./.f .F.. ..f:3k.:. F..fi,`.; ...... r�' ,4 ..n��.�••':'JrE....
... ... ..?J4....n..nrE'rS°i. ..+... ... J! yy .� ...... .r. ',9b1-::;.''•:;.� .�r
/JE'... f.. �......r.r: F.•:r. J�/�6'•.!fr,�'r fr, .. /fJ•... .......}...x.r.n�f.r..,r.. .,.xHr. ,dr...r '.$,r¢ rr..,•nvF:r'Jr`:r':}'.rl'A��i..: .3.:?iiik'dn,...: ..r....
x r..!rJa F»�, ,...4x.r♦,{ ,{Yn i J.✓ 4'.iR.3J6`'rw '+a�:r'r?WJ ..•rG�rfxa+ffr +.b, :!Hr-:p/:... .roadsfra'Y.x.r...7%af xln ,�• /r r ri.,r.tGj n.. rC.
-n..Y'� ::g' +- rflifv`+ r:h:Y: r:R.r.M�&r.r�'" 'y4:
�x.:;r'Li?F '�'•,.r'✓rlfr.;w!:.6/.r.fa. - FX .' '� w. .. '7tfr
In an effort to keep you informed on various Town topics, we have created an e-mail
notification system. Simply select the topics of interest and then enter your name and your e-
mail address at the bottom and click the Submit button.
You are in complete control over your subscription. You can add or remove yourself at any
time. To be removed from a list, just come back to this page.
IT)Events and Activities
L Press Releases
Agendas & Minutes
7
LTown Meetings
Planning & Zoning Commission
ILDevelopment Review Board
LI Board of Adjustments
.---,.--a par..- Advisory Board
Lii Budget & Bond Committee
flWater Utility Commission
•___1 Storm Water Utility Commission
LIII Citizen Corps Council
(Library
7-1 Parks & Recreation
:Public Safety & Crime Prevention
LI Roads and Public Works Projects
!- Election Information
Employment
i.q.�Subscribe Unsubscribe
Name
Email address
Submit Subscription Update formation sold iven awa or
At no time is your in , g y,
traded with any party. No one, other than the
http:// .townoforovalley.com/listserve.html 11/23/2004
Subscriptions Home Page Page 1 of 3
,r 3.,.�.. r/, :.;,Y.Jr��Lr r}�/�,r//rf•f, G f,���f�,�%/c Frc.fir l
4jt:'/ia: %Y,i•.''�r?'^:sy rdHt`�x'.`-.0 r:%/-a/. �i,G�}r6 igli�.
�:... }.r7✓,.:�i<:.Y}�'i,YIF,YS{yH•! F r5J` ! r'FJ,�:,9.4;r'';iG7J,�c7ra?.r4�'.�Jy if}i�(�4:
y�yu'F/��v•gr ai4 �M}.t� ,.".�y�� k�,'u'Yi'"r/G•�"�r r��.yJ� t0ubscrq'tu1
(SteU?! �
.
„:::,.:. ::;.:::::„::::„ :::;.:::2;,-4.4..,,:::::•, • ....,, :.:::: •,, .... • . • .. ••:„ „„: .,:, •.: ,:: ., .
0,:z..
•>,r: .
.
:egiltill:
•••••••
.„,.......
..
iii";::: i ....
FM: , } v : : ira : . : . :.:■:;•.r .<..'......■.
.......�..........r..t...:.�.,.
.... .:
......: ......
. .
,..:•1.,. ,,\ 4.-sie,:-.r,,,,--,:::
.\.'. '
iY....F..'.
:,...�. 3.;. ..'.. ..:.6r.`t.•
. .$"-t.J'.•.}'...%,..n' ..
.�,
„.„.:."-, ,i,.„:„:-:.:.:::....,.;,,,,,,,,:,
ryy, C, j ! 4
J ::::1;:!'1,111111r....:.:...:
.v .:: . :':� :T: weir. '-',,,,,#.:::::,:1,,,a'.:',',1$1.,
M4k
.."....... �
' .
•
•
kfatrir
.-r...
v}i : .. . v .n�\ ................. <.v: , .:::......,.. .n„. .."ia .. .... .. .v5 } � . : -� �y '� .::,k,,,,,,...„;.:-..,.,.:::.,:.
,,:,.......:„, .�.
:,.
._,-
.. .. . . f
v:. .:: Y $.�.:' . n: . .:::v . : � .. vN � ,-'''''.1..1.::'5'.:'.::-'1%..:
` ',� ;..:.:.-4...''!'''9,:::',.t,40:
ap
ttlir,-'
� . d' ov♦<la6ortr �` •"" yyd1 <2. � .:n : . : a.,. ::. :. •. /f, .r r: . S //G,,} n7.i/ � , g )u> vo /� i
F �"0r� r ' 9".�' f..J.JF•'S F7,�JrF -/„rY ��•..:..:. ......... .4,..:,....i...............::''':---:....-:.....'-',---
..:;:.;. :.....::.. ..::......... ....:.:......:. A nrvJJ :• F /LX :� ����4 � r:... t•'J,ra'O2h -".i>'d.a� 'ri>y<. /�,..,,,,,,,,,o,„„,,,,-,t,,
J� `RFK` , ;� •a ��..}..h.:�../.v ., -", . M ,/.., r.Y. ,.{ .L 1F-_,nf �,�:. •w,Y;. LyU� JFJyS, ,v *0rs{`: LS 'Qt<,',. .F, .5!.rLF. 'ti.' '.Jr a l:ar3.N �;... .YL9.�..:"
, �,tc:-,.�.�a..ar�br e'^r4F � rJ ./G.-t :..�.
L`cxy ,*<� �' ..f : at},f �
Y3 ' ' f�i�} 7Subscription
�a` r�ra ;• � r �,•,,..:.r .• h�;
rtrato,..ifitsEARetiolA
Complete
In an effort to keep you informed on topics ranging from tennis c as:
_z prevention, we have created an email notification system. Simply SE
Subscriptions topics of interest and then enter your name and your e-mail address
lavvp ,
e "nstrs bottom •and press the button - that s it. You'll get a confirmation mes
]PrivacyPolicy you're done. To sign off of a list, come back to this 13Egov Forms
LConduct
Topics Adult Sports Leagues
IlArts & Museum
fl Basketball
1/Business Services
13City Hall L. Baseball
UEconomic Development j------- Flag Football
Employment LiSoftball
' Environmental
I3Library
El Soccer
( Parks & Recreation [iii Volleyball
Planning
Arts
LA
Development
LPolice LTempe Arts News and Events
13Fire City Info
tRefuse
Council Agendas
13Resident Services
Town Lake
j -. Tempe Sister Cities
[ Transportation P. Diversity List
E \Jisitor CenterD Town Lake - General News and Announcements
[ Water Utility
Text Only Menu P Neighborhood Watch - Notices and Announcemen!
(•--.--• Neighborhoods - life in Tempe
Departments Tempe Opportunities Brochure - Updates and New
` Mayor and Council LJ Issue Notification
R+�Gy,
13. City l tanagerTem e News - news releases as they�-__� happen
Tempe
City Attorney
• City Clerk
Court L. Tempe Employment
Jobs -jobs with employers in Tempe
1Community Relations n Job Line -jobs available with the City
OCommunity Services
Fun Stuff
17/Development Services
[ Diversity Department IL Tempe Weather
http://www.tempe.gov/lists/ 11/23/2004
Subscriptions Home Page Page 2 of 3
DEconomic Deveiopment fl Mill Camera - picture emailed to you each day
r•-• •
kArinancial Services Library
13Fire
1:Hurnan Resources Book Alert - news about books
Dinformation Technology Recreation
Internal Audit 7 basketball -classes
Police
ElPublic Works LiAquatics Classes
1:2N\later Utilities fi KRC Special Interest Classes
Li Tennis Offerings
Golf for Youth
L. Rowing for Youth on Town Lake
fl Rowing for Adults on Town Lake
Li Batting Range
Sports Camps - classes
Vendors - if you do business with Temp
fl Engineering Consultants - Engineering department
Youth and Family
E Youth Sports
E Family Activities
L. Community and Special Events - Parks
El Teen Activities
Now select the operation you want to complete - subscribe to the a
checked lists, unsubscribe from the above check lists, or unsubscri
from all lists no matter what is checked.
14101Subscribe selected
Unsubscribe selected
Unsubscribe all lists
Enter your current email address. You must be doing this from the
same computer that you get email from this address. And, without
address no action will be taken.
Your Email address
Your Name
At no time is your information, sold, given away, or
Submit Request traded with any party. No one, other than the appc
list operators, can see the list of subscribers of any
Tempe list.
If you are a webmaster and would like to allow visitors to your
subscribe to one of our lists, click here and see how you can seamli
your page to our subscription system click here for instructions.
Enjoy your time on the lists
http://www.tempe.gov/lists/ 11/23/2004
ATTACH: SAMPLE BLOC—SANTA BARBARA, CA
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY HAS TO COMPENSATE GROWER FOR
DENIAL OF USE OF HIS LAND
In the largest land-use judgment ever against Santa Barbara County, a Santa
Maria jury on Monday awarded about $5.5 million to a farming company that
was blocked from planting vegetables because the county designated 95 acres
along Highway 1 as protected wetlands.
After a nearly three-week civil trial before a visiting Superior Court judge,jurors
unanimously agreed that the wetlands designation and other decisions made
several years ago by county planners preparing the Orcutt Community Plan had
recklessly violated the rights of Adam Brothers Farming Inc. The jury assessed
actual damages of$5.47 million collectively against the county Planning and
Development Department, one of its paid consultants and three current or
former employees who helped write the long-range planning document adopted
by county supervisors in 1997.
Posted by gandlwoods at 08:47 AM I Comments (0) TrackBack (0)
November 22, 2004
EAST HALEY ST LOOKING TO BECOME THE FUNKIEST STREET
IN TOWN
Santa Barbara's "funk zone" is known for its quirky mix of artisans, workshops
and businesses. But the area near the beach isn't the only place in town where
eclecticism is on display.
Artists have banded together to put a little funk into East Haley Street, converting
old restaurants and auto shops into ateliers for painters, photographers and even
metal workers.
Seizing on bargain ain rents and empty spaces east of Laguna Street in what many
g
consider a seedypart of town, they are making a place where creativity and
industry collide.
"This is one of the only places in town left that still has the ability to be changed,"
said Tanner Goldbeck, 34, who paints, illustrates and does metal sculpture down
an alley off East Haley Street.
As artists move in alongside auto mechanics and lumber shops, plumbing supply
stores and Mexican restaurants,the result, some say, is unlike anything in town.
Posted by gandlwoods at 08:31 AM I TrackBack (0)
November 21, 2004
SUPERVISORS LOOK AT "AFFORDABLE HOUSING" AGAIN
Despite strongopposition from some residents, county officials on Monday will
P pP
consider requiring developers to earmark a larger portion of their projects for
affordable housing -- or pay a fee for not doing so.
The Board of Supervisors is expected to vote on revisions to its Inclusionary
Housing and In-Lieu Fee program,which would require residential developers to
set aside as much as 30 percent of new homes for families making $130,000 or
less. Developers now reserve 5 to 20 percent of projects for lower-income
households.
Thep pro osal would also increase the in-lieu fees for builders who don't include
the affordable homes. The fees vary by area, but in Montecito they would jump
from $400,000 to $1.9 million for a 10-unit development.
Although housing officials note the proposed changes involve no rezoning, a
group of residents in the unincorporated Goleta Valley opposes the measure,
saying it could lead to further development. Indeed, the Coalition for Sensible
Yl g
Planning's steadfast opposition --which they say is based on mistrust for the
county--has complicated the future of what has become a highly contested
proposal.
Posted by gandiwoods at 06:57 AM I TrackBack (0)
November 20, 2004
BUELLTON SAYS NO TO NEW HOUSING
Thep lan to develop Buellton's Flying Flags RV Park into homes has hit a major
roadblock at the Planning Commission, which recommended the city deny a
proposal to build 200 homes on the site.
At a Thursday night meeting,the commission voted 2-0,with one abstention, to
reject the project in its current form.
Buellton's general plan calls for commercial development, not housing, along
Avenue of the Flags and Highway 246, where the 26-acre RV park is located. The
plan is in the process of being updated.
Thep roject would also require that the city annex 11 acres adjacent to the park to
meet open-space requirements.
Buellton Planning Director Ray Severn said that not only is the project
inconsistent with the general plan,but the annexation issue must be dealt with by
the City Council.
Posted by gandiwoods at 06:53 AM I TrackBack (0)
November 19, 2004
HAVING IT ALL
Today's Casa Article is all about the Saumsung Yep YP-T5. Hardly bigger than a
lipstick case, the Samsung Yepp YP-T5 digital audio player has it all. It has a
readable screen with up to 256 MB capacity, an FM radio tuner with a
microphone for recording as well as line-in recording, and a number of sound-
enhancement modes. It measures .9 by .9 by 2.1 inches and weighs only 1.3
ounces with the batter installed.
For more please click on Havint it All Here!
Posted by gandlwoods at 08:49 AM I Comments (0) I TrackBack (0)
November 18, 2004
RITZ-CARLTON PROJECT SEEKS AN EXTENSION
Developer Bill Levy has asked for a one-year extension to build his $170 million
Ritz-Carlton condominium development near the waterfront, fueling speculation
about the future of the high-profile project.
The extension request, the second for Mr. Levy's project, concerns some city
officials and critics who wonder what's causing the delay and whether the project
will ever see the light of day.
The Planning Commission will take up the matter next month.
Mr. Levy said the request for more time doesn't mean the project is in jeopardy.
Posted by gandlwoods at 07:18 AM I Comments (1) I TrackBack (0)
• November 17, 2004
RULING IN DISCRIMINATION CASE IMPACTS REAL ESTATE
BROKERS PERSONALLY
Underg eneral principles of corporate law, a real estate corporation is generally
liable for acts of its salespersons but a supervisor generally is not personally liable
for the acts of a salesperson. However, in a case that is out of step with general
corporate law, the Ninth Circuit held that the designated broker for a real estate
corporation could have personal liability for the negligent supervision of his
agent, and under agency laws, the court held that a broker could have personal
liability as principal for the actions of his agent, a salesperson. The court based
this holding on California real estate licensing law which places the responsibility
for supervision of salespersons on a specific real estate broker who is the officer
for the real estate corporation.
The Ninth Circuit also found sufficient justification to apply the "alter ego"theory
and pierce the corporate shield to impose liability on the individual
owner broker. In the case of Holley v. Crank, the court considered several facts to
be relevant: the broker was the sole shareholder of the corporation, he was the
presidentg
company's and designated officer/broker, it was very thinly capitalized,
and he failed to treat the corporation as a distinct entity in his tax return.
C.A.R. strongly disagrees with the holding that disregards the corporate structure
and traditional application of corporate and agency principles and is concerned
about the long-term ramifications of personal liability on brokers that have in
good faith tried to comply with the fair housing laws and have trained their
agents to do so.
Posted by gandiwoods at 07:50 AM I TrackBack (0)
November 16, 2004
LOCAL ARCHITECT LOOKS AT ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY
CONDOS
An architect known for his environmentally sensitive designs wants to build
condominiums on semi-rural property he owns just outside Carpinteria.
Scott Ellinwood, chairman of the Carpinteria Architectural Review Board and a
designer of"green"buildings for 3o years, presented plans for a 34-unit project
g
during a joint meetingthe of Carpinteria CityCouncil and Planning Commission
p
on Monday evening.
Mr. Ellinwood raised his family in a restored 1904 farmhouse at 1300 and 1326
Cravens Lane, where it intersects Via Real. His proposal includes retaining the
farmhouse and much of the open space --s a pond, meadow and stands of trees
on the site that covers almost 4 acres --while adding eight new three-story
buildings with a mix of one- and three-bedroom units
Posted by gandlwoods at 08:14 AM I TrackBack (0)
4 .
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
STAFF REPORT TO THE TOWN COUNCIL MEETING DATE: November 29. 2004
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL
FROM: Robert Conant, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS
BACKGROUND:
In June 1999, the Town Council approved a contract with Clarion Associates of Denver, Colorado, to
reorganize, correct grammatical errors and titles in the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised. The first draft of the
reorganized code was delivered to the Town for review in November 1999. Review of the draft began in June
2000 and was completed in September. As shown in the attached chronology, work on the code was placed on
hold in September 2000 in order for staff to complete the following major amendments:
• Communication Code
• Outdoor Lighting
• Parking
• Commercial Code
• Create new graphics (Project completed May 2004)
The Communication Code amendments were adopted by Council on February 7, 2001, Outdoor Lighting,
February 20, 2002 and Parking March 20, 2002. Council held a study session on the Commercial Code in
December 2003 and again in October 2004. The Commercial Code was then re-presented to the Commission in
a study session on November 22 and the Commission requested another study session, tentatively set for
December 13.
SUMMARY:
The Code Housekeeping project reorganized the Zoning Code to be a sub-set of the Town Code with the
Chapters beginning with Chapter 20 through 31. Excerpts, which illustrate the changes to the code, are
p g
attached.
The following reorganization and editing have been completed per the task order:
• Developed sub-table of contents for each chapter
• Provided an index for the entire code
• Reordered the chapters for a more logical sequence
• Eliminated conflicting requirements
• Improved the organization within articles, providing consistency
• Added and revised all graphics to clarify requirements
• Revised sections where code interpretations have been made by the Planning and Zoning Administrator
• Revised sections where staff identified confusing or unclear wording
Currently, all of the amendments completed have been inserted into the new code. The last draft received from
y
Clarion was in July 2004. The Comprehensive Code is on hold until the Commercial Code is adopted because
thep otential changes related to the Commercial Code are extensive and, with the new format, affect many
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT Page 2
different sections of the new code, including the tables that have been developed. Once the Commercial Code is
completed, staff will have it inserted into the new format. At that time, staff will bring forward the entire
reformatted code for adoption.
Attachments:
1. Comprehensive Code Amendments Chronology
2. Comprehensive Code Excerpts
/Ub----- -
Plann .0.411011111r
oni Pt Admi i strator
I
1f
.- n'• Devel•y ment Director
Co0
I
Town Manger
F:\INDIVID\BC\COMP CODE REPORT STUDY.doc
COMPREHENSIVE CODE AMENDMENTS
CHRONOLOGY
Dates for the comprehensive code amendment project are in bold; related projects are in regular
font.
Aug 1999 Contract let for $25,000 for Clarion to make editorial changes to the Code to
provide consistent, accurate, logical organization, and improved readability
without changing requirements.
Nov 1999 First Draft of Comprehensive Code Amendments delivered to the Town.
June 2000 Commission Study of Draft begins
Sept 2000 Commission Study Complete
Oct 2000 Project put on hold pending Communication Code, Outdoor Lighting and
Parking code amendments
Feb 2001 Communication Facilities Amendments to Chapter 9 adopted (Feb. 7, 2001)
Jun 2001 Commercial Code update begins
Aug 2001 Second Draft of Comprehensive Code Amendments delivered to Town for
review
Sep 2001 Project on hold
Oct 2001 Planning and Zoning Commission Study Session Commercial Code
Feb 2002 Outdoor Lighting Code Adopted (Feb. 20, 2002)
Mar 2002 Planning and Zoning Commission Study Session Commercial Code
Mar 2002 Parking Code adopted by Town Council (March 20, 2002)
Apr 2002 Planning and Zoning Commission Study Session Commercial Code
May 2002 Planning and Zoning Commission Public Hearing Commercial Code
Jun 2002 Planning and Zoning Commission Public Hearing Commercial Code
Jul 2002 Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of Commercial Code to
Town Council (July 2, 2002)
Oct 2003 Contract for $4,450 let for graphics to be inserted into Code
Dec 2003 Town Council Study Session on Commercial Code
Jan 2004 Requested follow-up Council Study Session on Commercial Code
March 2004 Purchase Order for $4,000 with Clarion to insert all updates to Code since 2000
April 2004 Contract for graphics completed
July 2004 Clarion delivered CD of update Code. Project on hold for completion of
Commercial Code Amendments
Oct 2004 Town Council Study Session, Commercial Code (October 11, 2004)
Nov 2004 Planning and Zoning Commission Public Hearing Commercial Code
Financial Data:
Tasks Contract/PO Spent
Clarion Original Contract $25,000 $25,000
Clarion Add New Codes 4,000 1,000
McKinney add Graphics 4,450 4,450
Totals $33,450 $30,450
Contents
CHAPTER 20: GENERAL PROVISIONS 1
Section 20.1 Purpose and Title 1
Section 20.2 Interpretation and Conflict 1
Section 20.3 Effect of Repeal on Pending Suits, etc. 1
Section 20.4 Severability 2
Section 20.5 Section Headings 2
Section 20.6 References to this Code 2
Section 20.7 Effective Date 2
Section 20.8 Publications of Code for Sale 2
CHAPTER 21: REVIEW AND DECISION-MAKING BODIES 3
Section 21.1 Officers and Agencies 3
Section 21.2 Town Council 3
Section 21.3 Planning and Zoning Commission 4
Section 21.4 Planning and Zoning Department 6
Section 21.5 Development Review Board 8
Section 21.6 Board of Adjustment 9
Section 21.7 Appeals Hearing Officer 10
CHAPTER 22: REVIEW AND APPROVAL PROCEDURES 15
Section 22.1 General Provisions 15
Section 22.2 General Plan Amendment Procedures 15
Section 22.3 Amendments and Rezonings 20
Section 22.4 Use Permits 37
Section 22.5 Development Review 39
Section 22.6 Building Permits 44
Section 22.7 Certificates of Occupancy 46
Section 22.8 Sign Permits 46
Section 22.9 Subdivision and Development Plans 50
Section 22.10 Grading Permit Procedures 65
Section 22.11 Native Plant Preservation, Salvage and Mitigation Plans 77
Section 22.12 Appeals From Administrative Decisions 87
Section 22.13 Variances 88
CHAPTER 23: ZONING DISTRICTS 91
Section 23.1 Division of Town Into Districts; Enumeration 91
Section 23.2 Boundaries of Districts - Rules Where Uncertainty May Arise 99
Section 23.3 Effect of Establishment of Zoning Districts 100
Section 23.4 Table of Permitted Uses 100
Section 23.5 Table of Dimensional Requirements 111
Section 23.6 Measurements and Exceptions 112
Section 23.7 Property Development Standards for Single-Family Residential Districts 116
Section 23.8 Property Development Standards for Multi-Family Residential Districts 121
Section 23.9 Property Development Standards for Nonresidential Districts 131
CHAPTER 24: SUPPLEMENTARY DISTRICT REGULATIONS 145
Section 24.1 Tangerine Corridor Overlay District 145
Section 24.2 Oracle Road Scenic Corridor District 163
Section 24.3 Golf Course Overlay Zone 193
Section 24.4 Hillside Development Zone 202
Section 24.5 Riparian Habitat Protection Overlay District 212
CHAPTER 25: USE REGULATIONS 223
Zoning Code/Oro Valley AZ August 2001 i
.iy4..:
r-_,--- --,
.., ,,
,,,,
A.,,..,
:,-1 -,,,e
s
WY('
`r' CONTENTS
o
.' 3 -.,. Section 25.1 Conditions for Specific Uses
223
``" ,= 272
klit, Section 25.2 Accessory Uses and Structures
Section 25.3 Temporary Uses and Structures 279el' tt--.'•11
CHAPTER 26: SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT PLANS 283
'x
f 4L
[ tA,:, Section 26.1 Purpose and Intent 283
�WA'� 283
i:..... Section 26.2 Design Standards
op p." ' Section 26.3 Required Improvements 287
Section 26.4 Modifications of Subdivision Regulations 290
*ie.
291
„ Section 26.5 Provision of Recreational Area
��, �# �- 295
s 74;: : Section 26.6 Assurances
411:-
.*ii.;.- CHAPTER 27: GENERAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS 301
I:; h ri 301
7'-'4 Section 27.1 Operational Performance Standards
� �=4* Resource Preservation 302
-�-���� Cultural
'�' Section 27.2 Cut Section 27.3 Public Art Provisions 305
_,!..Vi, vY
••� Section 27.4 Native Plant Preservation, Salvage and Mitigation Plan Requirements 307
k :,, Section 27.5 Landscape, Irrigation and Buffer Yard Plans 309
:ft:W:
�
Section 27.6 Off-Street Parking 321
-: Section 27.7 Grading 342
�
WI,., ���. CHAPTER 28: SIGNS 353
.:' ;: 353
Section 28
���:! �, _ .1 General
Section 28.2 Requirements 359
:i' .�
S , tit Section 28.3 Permanent Signs 362
1 .-) ° Section 28.4 Temporary Signs 373
���, t
s; -- CHAPTER 29. NONCONFORMING USES 387
ev N'41i ,4i Section 29.1 Continuance of Nonconforming Use of Land 387
fiat,
i n 29.2 Continuance of Nonconforming Use of Building or Land;
Sect o.4..r :
T3 ' u
;, '-_ Change to Another Nonconforming Use 387
its k i.. Section 29.3 Nonconforming Use Created by Change in Zoning Code
41 , 387
or District Boundaries
�4 Section 29.4 Abandonment of Nonconforming Use of Building or Land 387
Nucki'.,
£` Section 29.5 Enlargement, Extension, Reconstruction or Structural
I}IA; Alteration of Building or Land 388
,�: Section 29.6 Destruction of Nonconforming Building or Land 388
R` Section 29.7 Use in Violation of Previous Zoning Regulations 38
8
OfSection 29.8 Expansion of Legal Nonconforming Uses 388
' , i r CHAPTER 30: ENFORCEMENT AND PENALTIES 391
' Section 30.1 Enforcement
391
1,1.1:-.,ASS,''_ Section 30.2 Violation and Penalty 392
v-
-� ` -- CHAPTER 31: DEFINITIONS 393
:ski, ADDENDUM A ORACLE ROAD EXISTING ZONING BY SUBAREAS 440
��.�r -. 441
i
ADDENDUM B ORACLE ROAD VIEW ANALYSIS CRITERIA
x
?` ADDENDUM C ORACLE ROAD SIGNIFICANT VEGETATION MAP 442
w
T` : :; ADDENDUM D DESIGN GUIDELINES AND ILLUSTRATIONS 443
' � ADDENDUM E APPROVED NATIVE PLANT LIST 444
> S
: I 447
I -' ADDENDUM F APPROVED REVEGETATION SEED MIX LIST
..1,-,,-
.,,,
ADDENDUM G PROHIBITED PLANT LIST 448
;d
XADDENDUM H REQUIRED BUFFER YARDS ADJACENT USE ZONE 449
r�{•
A�
3.
yy_
1,-k 4
ii August 2001 Zoning Code/Oro Valley AZ
f--
w-s
i
`:i
CONTENTS
ADDENDUM I REQUIRED STREETSCAPE BUFFER YARDS 450
ADDENDUM J BUFFER YARD BOUNDARY REQUIREMENTS 451
ADDENDUM K BUFFER YARD SPECIFICATIONS 452
INDEX 453
Zoning Code/Oro Valley AZ August 2001 iii
uI'••
Ch .c N N
11131111111 111
N .0N
CC D
I-- p 0 O. 00I
UI ateI1111111 1111 MEI
`25
as I 111110 Ill 1111
i __111111_ 111
a_
111E11 11111 CLEl
N N a
C 'V
0 111111
V V a_ 11111 Q_
11111d
U11111
' Z 10_ Q_ Q_ a. a_ 11111
a- a-
V II 0
co a. a_ a_ a. I n_ 1111110
l•
•C
et- thw
I0_ a_ Jl1 _111
1111111 U C
ca 1-
u. C
III 1111111
5 C
cn
1111111
CO
e
w m C i .lin a_ a_ 1110
w = a >
I a_ ci.Mill 11111 11111110
R. _ c
UJ
a i
;' r'o
I_ I° ° I1I__III
. 1110
a
A a
N n
UJ a
ID ,N 10- 0-
1110
1— t° 1111 MIN
• d r-to a_ la.liii_1111110
Cf Ce M
C
V1 !=M a. d liii_III
U
L!:ti a. 1o_ a_ 111°
t=
: i_; ! ! ' i
cr
cacn .E cNcn — o i o Q, c W y-- cn s o
U _ co N c 3 c _ cn ,- U�N c
.0 cu C D)fl IIIi .
a) ca o 3 m� c 3 U o •v c�
0 2 .cn E cn `° o ct cn t >,` "iii -o , .c o c 2-
_ c.o
fr. E co - c c c? cn •_ a� 3 = a� U oL w 30
Li oE , cncna> > > 0 e o t co ov 0 cn0 No cco4-
E -0. a) a� =-a) a) m o 0 >m m a 3 .J = > cv o 0
o 3 •- cn 3 c� 0 3 3 0 = � � o to s 3 cn'cn Cn Fo- Q m U� U � a•c°
0 0
w H _o
IL. Cl) I-
O U .w�
0 Q ./) w
LU P TitZ
ict Z =V w U O
Q J V ice.+
co (i) Nn = N
O w a) a. a E
--__
Y
Q 0 r cn O
Q N
liii
6
N
O
II (LOOM H III IIM a
P
a.- II II 111111
a w
o
o F=aII II 1111 U
a)
.a
as
0 11 1111 HMI
NI-
ei — V N a 3111 U 1 a-1111 U
m 11
'U
O ti-
v EL"- a M U I a M 0
E II
V VZ11 111 aIM 0
W
&t011 II111113110 co
co
a
>,
Oz
-E &M 0_I 11111131
CU 15i
• z-
,
��v O
U
U
W OttII M 1131 �-
= o
0N
i
W m C=oII II 1111 a =
CC Ilisi,
CC 110 111 1 a_
a r
N rt.- U a 2
W
-� A e=O d. ,,..;•,
.
Q ix N
1110
aCO 111 1111
01-W W
11°
C
CC v .
1llo
'IMF
/!C
1110
11111 a
,
!'�
iXU IMF
f
IIIa)
N
W a) c ro Cr) > Cr)t 2 a - 3 .0 p CU
� p co C --g . 2-6m_
CT)03�
O u) p O
W - C-i .o = a E .. w c m N_0 . 3 `- c
Cl) co ( p E cD E O „, -0-0 -6 ,-0 - c c L >
i50. c V U p m . co N c p= p p' p o o•`
V Zvi O So` p m a) O a) 0 u) cn3pwma) me
II. = �, O co p • N p S a a) O t O C_ O . O >+
V Q C C L c!) C U— >'+.- -am= C U N O p c m
W c c o m '> N p - 3 c m :- p m L'�' U p — 4 '
a. 00 = 00 =O •C. m m • _ ,.0 m a= _cw N N`�- m • cam-+, t�
• Z7 o C • o• .0 O = C (A (A p.> C p C p ci
E C E o "0 -6-5.-?- 15
-�-- w O C (n = .1C .Y 16 0 L-.° = U.� U) N di-
co
UL U LL. o 5- 0 o � o o > > � o c a o 'o as "mo o o� o o li
rnDO 2 — .n a) 2 Z • as o oa o 2 >.ca cn .
0
Le 0
* O rn
W _
Q
V N
W
W LL11
m Ca V
m U
0 0 m
Q I 0 LU triN N tri tri triN
N
a-
n.o! O N a. a. o..
a_
CI.
a)
o F-n-
a.cn 05 a- a.
� N
0 U 0
ca
V
- U
a) V, U
E
E
0o V Z 0 a- a- 0 u
V
ci co2
a 0
- C
�
�
+ a.. H
E N _ C
CO2
_ - C
u.
cn W n= a_ a. 1
Cl) - C
W c0=t0 a a
+ ALL.
g a a. 0 F-
Wcr.~�
CL
r e=O 0- a. 0 LL
cl
Ct e- d
11
N _ a
W dd
m � e-N 0
E •
I u.
0 e a. Q.
0
pn gr.M
Cl) , 0- a. 0
N Q. a- 0
Cl_ n- 0
•
CD U N cn rn N 4
W = -a cv O 0 co
N a-cn a) o m -t CD vi v
a) a C o o)}, O TD a).•U +_ 5 U a a p 5 p L >
V P.. > •L (n C C cn C C C ? O N 'O O 'U N +-• N N Q.`� N'...
eL O a) cn
E LU U v' D- 03 - mV 13 Ec rn= a) rn w '«- rnN.- a) ) c al vi o =_1
d s N v a)Cn
`�'= vi �' v E c� '� upi -cm ` v aci.T "_
V rn� voi rno -6`" g. c cn o � � a) v•«.- w rn.a o o a s s a) o o o c �' a -'� a) mC c Et a) = c Cl-c''-5
c a a)
d V va)) a). ma) 03 v 0 E.0 a? N a) 3 c p� moo—U cn '3 0 o rn s o U —aoi cin-0 Q=-v
co N c v o) cn u) > o o v cn .� c a — cn o m m v �, .o a
.0 d w rn -•N U U U cn U cn U > U U•C co C c .-.v L c
HN >•5 C >• > > > _a a o••N > > In a ) j- 0 c O = a) a co c CO c= o
CNJCL 3 a8 2 � a d Q. O aca ca...._•-• xj
N 'L •
N
Iia— Co
.. C O
Q 'C O W
ONV) Q ;_
0
W
im !X
t'
}
••••. • . ••• •. .
; U u 1111111
0OW
QM
C7cem N
Loi.
CD
fr
1- p (LOOM 11E111 II a 11111111111111
2 'c E
UN MEM IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
d L.. ar
Q.
sc
O o Ha
a
a)
.si
`aav�05 1111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
05
‘t
N _ 6 N
!!!III. a. 11111A11111CLCL
co
_ 'ri
O �-
Z
E t a.11/111 a. 111
a) E
u) O
w
vn
J
Q
Z
›' O
sElim P
Li- z
co E.
= -N UO
U
W (i1111111 1111111111111111v �-
=m CD
N
w moiw 1111111 11111111111111111
H m =
W H
W. V.0
M re" 11E111
11111111111111111 re
N w
a
w a . a
m ". ceN 111111111 11111111111111111
la— .
. 11111111111111111
2 M M
in , IMMO 111111111111111111 111111111. 11111111111111111
CL N.
lT
Ce r 111111 11111111111
Cr) Iii
C�O �� � ,� U a TD c c c E 0) 6 Ew U0U) C c , U .c C
W � c N o f o .W .S 0 - 0 =- a) c
W co
.'n ' E•-
0 c� co [V . - c . c Uc Cti a) 73 co ` o.c C N O .
LL C ,12
N U) w2 U c c U O c O V C 0 cv O Q-O _cu O a) N 0 N .0 N'c
1,6E23 76 ..c .i" O (n U) C C
LJ1uU C C N Q)
W U) O O 0 c ( �C o 7_Z3 0 0 2 0 cx3,C a'a.co > w (d (O (O N!- (O+t fo (O N O U) .0 - U) U) O 0 ` U)3 (1 N U) p
< < < oomm3 • m3 • oE0000l-). w Q . w -ocr u- E
C/) 10 -0
w U
W0
0
Q Cil
0)
-
H 62 rt 'i •C
0 w oc c a)u
0
U Q �w EEw (13 al 03
o a) co
Eµ u_ co E
• .••.• •. • • •• •• •
J V)
OCA 11111111111111
QIX
a.caOCI) 111111 RI
CL 1"" 11111 11111
a)
01141 0 a a 1111
ave
05 IIII 11111
- 6" a a_ a. a.
Ca
U
E �j a a. a. a.
E
o
V o Z 111 a.
•
ii.CD RIF_ a.
>.
PCoaa
E . w Ma 11111
2
w �� IIIII 11111
cn
w MO=W 11111 11111
N
W E~
a
�o
M age- 111111 III
N
CO *E W N IIIII 11111
et tu-
t- u.
6 . M Ill III
C
Ce
e=NII
CC 11111
Ce w- IIII III i
N
W o U - E o -0 c
a) 3 a)�c co o a) co` U) 'r C O o 0 `-
•D N D)a • - C C•> V) u) U ,a) a)
E W CD S C a) Q E E N U3 a) O 6 a) - a) o -) N to a) `' 0.g •.�.
o
c� � � E -c- oc c3Ncv, . 2
rn> �•�c c nc'c o 'vi c 13 c� co c-13T-000
--o L.
al
O•- M L - M a)— M C (U = N N N C • C
Fa - •
ca s, mu) 3 �rn= ECcn•vo-i•0mE0o cu cc ._ .,
w'a_ .0 ` .f. .,,, N ` . C N C U_ _ •- _ •U
t/� -a
~ O o o c v,-0 O ` a) Q N O= , , a) p,U) X a) U •
C6 v ,� 2 a s.n o-n.c CO a a) CO..q m TA m o m cn E rn-v a) 2.E O .
Ct ..ril ccl
W0il
F- co
Q •C o 0 cu W • c
0 N to F.. c°
H
L
ow
N N Q C
N .0 co O
(Y n �-
Q cn=
U o € Q.r111111111 I
N a a�
o O H Q. 0 a. 0 111111111 I
a)
:a
H CLU)ea 111111111 I
N NI-
CS N Cl-11
11111 a s
0
Ev
iIiIIII ° a
a) E
o
V UZ 101101.111 a
w
U)
ci co 111111111 m
J
a
.'' o
CD
u. Z
&v O
.5 1111111111 I u
o
W th it 111111111c)
m o N
H m =
E
W
F-
Q
111111111a
r-o
M IX" 111111111 L
N W
I L
in E ce c,. 111111111Q
N LL
6 .!..,
ix M
C
rii
e=M _ 111111111 I
CZ it
r Ce�
• V
r
IX.-
111111111 I
O r 0.-, O
Lu N c — L > C L C O C a, U)
O C_ _ to
a' �.•= c N ca L C CD U 6 75 0 U)
0
OY >+O
0 3 N C .O c = C
W � cnrnccao0oo - gym z;>.u) Z'>>cn .( v °.v'tA
c _ c
CO L..
U) N >,CU >,cn U T:U N p C) Y O ca•` O N-� U) N
0 .0 =-o , 2c
C a) O L C — N N U 0 a) 2_3.- a) N Rf cn
V m m C O O N 13 3• C L Q) .o O (Q .D O ca O O = U _O - V
V- O,` N N o) O't7 ='C5N 4)r-- ni N caw L N O L ` O O•X O O
U 'p C L U C O O o O 000N > 4.4 cn cn
W Etmm� I-4:' •.2a cU -0c �E 5 �� s �' ' ' a o o 2 E > >a0 o
O:° O c •> U L N ca Z7 L .c U ` c U Es • E _c O N c,s O (13
N C L C O O ._ U a E O O O O • •c > • ` -� O = _73-
4-
.0 .-• N L O to L O `- Q•C N U to O• •_. C cU •p C ` C U O U O
+' O O 15 O O O C L v- .N O L .- O x N U "t CD O L L O O L- N U Q co
0ECCUzDc -._ oov) E . E ( a� . c .cL < 00000ILI IL0 .ccncvcnI O
O
O
0��' 0
0 cm
0
H a) 0
Ca.? c N
W —
co (13
0 a
cc
„,V,:k,„,,,
,L 4s
'
s�cr �0
��> Q W -- r r r
it CC to to Lo ul
C\1 C,1 CN1 CNI
oaf:I-W.,' , , , . . , , ,
f iw.t,;:i
r. r
✓ , le
tomtitf j, O)
. , , , , , , , , .
-,-,
.... ,
�< ,, O F-a U a. a_
y4n -t;.. 1 r
a�' i 1
� Z,
r
g4 s t r
Air' HY y*> ,
v cV
. a_ 0 a a. a. 0 a. a_ a a. a C_ a
03
= r-> , At ' r CL 0 a.
a?:c 4 E vc.� a_ c� c� a_ a_ a. a
O
Ittr4/!A*
II V �j z a a_ C_ U C_ a. 0 0 0
a.j-Iiii
.
i'-'4, ..,•-:.
Sia �
t:t.'. , , , i , .., , , ,
fir to 0
Ilrat
W,d:': _ , U 0
, , CCU
7t2 i I
`�`LL•yl�y ` I
i�r' ti fS.i'3-, . 1 , r l 1 !
l coS1i
�y.i. W
3
a o
4.,%,„,x--1 W (n O=W
6aMt� ✓ , r . ♦ . , I
7
, `Y s 2 r
s”k
.1,4;4, 1%.W
,f!N'S-, fit r a. r .
litil: ; •• •
;'''' ' N
P .. ;sem m
r�{'
I ..-N
Iv „arc,
rAtz,i
„..1x.• CD
V • r.
-- is
sst _ f t,1
,
.:11,.:.
i;".'
g .�`n� A
..,,,t-e_-,_..1, ^ C .0
N C N -D
0)W >, aN p C. , a - O
;144-::-47', a)
C
t W o ._ .c =• v rn a) ca o cn cn c �+
o a _ _L _ o
U •` a) C N O '-
N •C
- 4 . S� O•C O
Elom, m2
” a C "? a) a, - m Q O 'C E ca N o_•� O c.. O '� Q)d c:
3�` r" O a a) a) c a to a Q) = co CD O N O co a) c9 c t O a)
'Ci'- �"' a) V a) Qy >, O a) ` ` .C.}�—, V (� •
U p O a) O a O
cn _ _ cv _
U (� a. to L U �. c.0
�.�,�:' a.W o o c n.c� C C v
-R ,,.,-- Hca ,„ cp g E O a) Y z 6 O U= 2 cu 1-A C €'C C to N -E a) •Q-` O O •�S1
. �.. - v (a •C .- a, C ` O O p -C .0 O-D =•, c O s >. >. C CC) E. cn O O N C.n :�
r�r .-,�_ X -C N 0 a. 03 n3 _ — C 13 O v- V R3 cL3 = O O O O -C O '` O v)
"''' CO 02 .0._COCO
Cr 13
l t*. 4# a_ t O 0 a)
f� _
-, :"_,. ` Q 4 0 a
1-.4;` #'. g, C v W <C
,• :t' �. O N U) Q CZ
h
tg-�a C.) a)
A �i Y
k 'n, w 2
'-',„.4*7-.'k*.f.v. cn
`'
v r'�P��y f q1
;S.i.J v
• •• • . • a • •
•
..J U) 3
0 0
OW 11:11
iei u) u) CCcNi.(-) a)' O
Q m=
U .- II 11111111111111 Ell 111E11 1
N L. II- _JIIIIIIIiia
a. r
15 o g-a. II 1111111111111111
a) 1111111 all a all 111
ini
as
1- a un t Ill IIIIIIIIIIUIIIIIIIII 1111
a a a
III
et Ill
N ON a a a s a a s111 III a ail a
Ill C •5 a
0 E EL"- CL I a 111F
E a a
CD 111
0
V Cj Z Q.111111111111111111111 im
a a in a
w
&to II a. 111111111111111111111 III
ala Q. 1111111111 III �la O
6
. c z
lxv a a_ a IlIldil
IIIII a3°-
II
2 II a O
co ti'tII 11111111111111111111 11111111 U _a' in a- O
= O
cn
0
W NO=co N
E II
W
F-
IIIIIIIUIIIIUIIIII III all a. M w
a
N A ce" 1111111111 111 a3°-
In a cc
W
W
Qri
E N1111111111111 1111111 dr a n
F- LL
61=c0
c IX in II 1111111111111 1111111 a lillF 11111 a
-/5 , mi
re a
1111111111 III a I a_ 11111 a
e=N
CC~ II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 111111 a 111 a IIIII
a
, vp.
le-7- 111111111111111111 a s Ia
a
Ill
W
a v 3 O N N = r c
co 70 V N = O) N L
W O cc o u) C O iii O O c c o
u) • ra >,C E Cl) O 0- •i j O O
L • va) as- >`U u) •,, N u) f) -8 ,) U CO `.
V of c o o8-. . . 2 > > c c La) �c 'c •5 N
LL. `-' N a rn_ CO X 0 .c S CO w Cl). > > .o .5 Q
a • •O• L5 ` C.0 L a) v8 O L 0 O 'O O O U 1> >•
to a. N c L ` O O O i 0) cv E ` c o `) i u) E E .0 N �, N
O 0 0 U L - • O O . O N cv hil m O u) O u) • O (,3
w c) V) o 0 CO D FT F- �-- E Lco O 2 cn F- u o a c ca c) .- c� o "-' ' o L
Q2.2.1'22 n n < O
a
w -o
u) o
CC W
0
O C W CO u)
t�
Wco
'a = W } C
a� c
V Cl) O o
N
W o 0 _U 5 cc �
Co ... O v W L W u)
�Q QO Q ~ 00
00 < <
rf
:.t3
f Q CC N
4
,} a oo p COI
I
a)
z
. 0 11
aI
T
acnesI
cd
Y
73
= N.
` Ev
s. E
v 'vz a.
thw
a
• E ce� a
co
Ij.
' ca
co. g ce i`t - .
CV.:
W /).O=CO a.
Wtr.i•-a .
CL.
• eh Ce.v. •
N
;: W
m E 14N
4:E co
,;
d e-M a.
WM
. Q.
IX
; N
-r*, N U
DE a)
"CiW a) m u) c
d -c `n Y co
p N ca c
N
W c cY= cv•-L- c cn
w� CO CO C 0 L �
a) ' U-0 c0 U E
1'•
a N U d w O c O
4- N U M U ` O (1)
0 IL .c U c U `+-, cn
£„ c -v a2 o
1 Cl. c F--
.. U 'c
c0 U Q -in' to .E cz • 0
f:‘,4)"4:,
he �
a C C
tAt
Q 'c v
O N u) Q :-
0 •
Lu i.i
�,,
Cl) -
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 3
COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
NOVEMBER 29, 2004
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL
FROM: Brent Sinclair, Community Development Director
David Andrews,Finance Director
SUBJECT: STATUS OF THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
BACKGROUND:
is the method
The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) by which Oro Valley addresses future equipment and
in-depth planningand financing over a five-year period. The Capital
infrastructure requirements through p
m (CIP) assists in the im lementation of the Oro Valley General Plan by:
Improvement Progra p
short range and
• developing a prioritized schedule ofg long range community capital needs;
■ p roviding a means for evaluating projects; and,
• analyzing the community's ability
munit 's and willingness to pay for them in the most cost-effective way.
Capital Projects are those that cost over $10,000, have an expected useful life of two years or more, and become
an asset of the Town. Historically, the schedule of the CIP has been as follows:
October Project requests submitted to Staff; Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) established
November TAC reviews requests and sets the process
prioritizes rioritizes re uests and recommends capital improvement expenditures
January requests
February CIP reviewed by Commission and adopted by Council
process involves a Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)The CIP to analyze and prioritize community needs
and project requests. Priorities utilizing
are determined bya point system that ranks each project according to
prescribed criteria. The Technical
AdvisoryCommittee is made up of representatives from Town Council,
Town Boards and Commissions, Town department heads, division heads, and citizens at-large.
STATUS OF FY 2004/2009 CIP
The attached memo and spreadsheetprovides rovides a financial status report on the adopted FY 2004/2009 CIP.
FY 2005/2010 CIP AND NEW PROJECT REQUESTS
Project requests for the upcoming CIP
have been received and compiled. They have not yet been evaluated or
ludin all theproject sheets is to illustrate the growing magnitude of the
ranked by the TAC. The purpose for inc g
projects capital and the level of information used to evaluate them.
p
NEXT STEPS AND FUNDING
Currently, the CIP is funded primarily through throu h three sources: General Fund, Highway User Revenue Fund
(HURF), and Townwide RoadwayDevelopmentImpact Im act Fees (TDIF). Funds utilized by HURF and TDIF can
projects. Therefore, the remainder of the projects must compete for
obviously only be used for roadway type
General Fund monies. Historically
this worked well when the Town was smaller, newer and had sizable year
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2
end sulus in the operating budget. This however, has not been the case in recent years. As a result many CIP
rp p g
projects have either been delayed or not funded. In some cases, the Town has utilized Contingency Reserve
Funds to make up the difference. We are therefore at a crossroads with respect to funding Capital Improvement
Projects. Below are three options for funding with probable outcomes:
1. Continue current practice of using General Fund.
• Many CIP projects will not be completed or funded.
• Unfundedp roj ects will result in less new improvements to the Town and place more stress on current
facilities.
2. Utilize Contingency Reserve to fill the gap.
• This will fund many projects in the short term.
• May eventually deplete the Contingency Reserve or a good portion of it.
3. Create a new revenue source that can be dedicated, in part to the CII
• Likely new sources include various types of sales taxes.
• Such sources willp rovide consistent on-going revenue and are less affected by economic conditions.
FUTURE CIP PROCESS
In
addition, we are also at a crossroads with respect to the CIP evaluation process. The current process has
worked well andprovides an objective ective analytical approach to project needs assessment. The process also
o J
facilitatesJ
roject awareness and coordination among the various Town Departments, Boards and Commissions,
p
etc. However, a detectable amount of fatalism has surfaced in recent years from TAC members due to the lack
of fundingprovided for CIP projects. In other words, a significant amount of time and effort goes into the
process, worthy projects don't get funded. Therfore, the funding approach taken by
but the end result is many
the Town will have an effect on our future evaluation process.
4tAs-4,
C unity Development Director
Finance Director
.• j
Town Manager
Attachments:
1. Status of FY 2004/2009 CIP
2. FY 2005/2010 New Project Requests
F:\IN DIV ID\HBS\TCSCCIP 112904.doc
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and Council
•
FROM: David Andrews, Finance Director
DATE: November 29, 2004
SUBJ: CapitalImprovement 2004/05 Im rovement Program, Financial Status Report as of
September 30, 2004
Attached to this memorandum please find a financial status report as of September
30, 2004 for the Town's FY 2004/05 Capital Improvement Program. The report
,
the budget, year-to-date expenditures and year-end estimated
includes9
capitalproject expendituresfor every (cost of$10,000 or more) that was approved
by wayof the final Town Budget adoption in August 2004.
TheCapitalImprovement Im rovement Program's total budget for FY 2004/05 is $41,501,905.
This figure includes the following types of projects:
General Fund equipment and facilities
General Fund debt service for land and facilities
Pima County Bond funded projects
Coyote Run vehicles
Roadway repair and maintenance projects
Roadway system capacity improvement projects
Roadway system capacity improvement debt service payments
Drainage improvement projects
Please note that capital improvements for the Oro Valley Water Utility are reviewed
and recommended by the Water Utility Commission.
In the future, this report will be prepared and distributed on a quarterly basis.
Please give me a call should you have any questions.
Cc: Chuck Sweet, Town Manager
All Department Heads
Mary Rallis, Accounting Supervisor
Joseph Meyer, Management & Budget Analyst
G:\MEMOS\04-05 CEP Status Report.doc
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FISCAL YEAR 2004/2005
Status Report as of September 30, 2004
Description
FY 2004/2005
FY 2004/2005 Year-End Over/
Year FY 2004/2005 Y-T-D Estimated Under
Dept. Funded Budget Actuals Actuals Budget
General Fund Projects:
M.D.C. Replacements .Police 2004/2005 $ 46,900 $ - $ 46,900, $ -
Police Records Expansion/Bldg. Security Police 2004/2005 160,000, 2,039 160,000 -
File Servers Police , 2004/2005, 18,000 . - 18000_ -
Basement Remodeling Building Safety 2004/2005 47,239 . 2,205 47,239 , -
Laptop Projector(APAAC Grant) Legal 2004/2005 10,000 - 10,000 -
JDK Park Restroom Facilities Renovations Parks 2003/2004 96,480 , 48,965 96,480 , -
Swimming Pool Aquatics Office Enclosure Parks _ 2003/2004, 18,000 - 18,000 -
Marked Police Vehicles _Police 2003/2004 137,200 - _ 137,200 -
'`'" 533,819 $ 53,209 $ 533,819 $
Subtotal General Fund Projects $ -
General Fund Debt Service: .
Certificates of Participation-Series 1996
,
Principal Payments G&A , 2004/2005 $ 190,000 $ 190,000 , $ 190,000 _ $ -
Interest Payments ,G&A , 2004/2005 26,690 15,768 . 26,690_ -
MPC Bonds-Series 1999 -
Principal Payments G&A 2004/2005 175,000 90,000, 175,000, -
Interest Payments G&A 2004/2005 42,445 22,123 42,445 -
Excise Tax Revenue Obligations-Series 2000 _ _ -
Principal Payments G&A 2004/2005 90,000 90,000 90,000 -
Interest Payments G&A 2004/2005 49,335 . 25,703 . 49,335 . -
MPC Bonds-Series 2001 _ -
Principal Payments G&A 2004/2004 121,290 121,290, 121,290 , -
Interest Payments G&A 2004/2005 127,397 , 62,573, 127,397 -
Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds-Series 2003 -
Principal Payments G&A 2004/2005 70,000 70,000 , 70,000 , -
Interest Payments G&A 2004/2005 218,456 109,578 . 218,456 -
Subtotal General Fund Debt Service $ 1,110,613 $ 797,034 $ 1,110,613 $ -
Subtotal General Fund _. _ . w $ 1,644,432 $ 850,243 $ 1,644,432 $ -
.
Pima County Bond Funds:
Steam Pump Ranch Acquisition Parks 2004/2005 $ 2,000,000 $ - $ 2,000,000 , $ -
Honey Bee Village Acquisition Parks 2004/2005 1,000,000 - 1,000,000 -
Naranja Town Site Acquisition Parks 2004/2005 3,000,000 - 3,000,000 -
Oro Valley Public Library Building Expansion Parks 2004/2005 1,100,000 - 1_,100,000 -
CDO Linear Park Construction Fund Public Works 2004/2005 1,570,000 105,011 1,570,000 , -
'
Subtotal Pima County Bond Funds $ 8,670,000 $ 105,011 $ 8,670,000 $ -
Public Transportation Fund:
Transit Vehicle Purchase Transit 2004/2005 $ 60,000 $ - $ 60,000
Subtotal Public Transportation Fund . $ 60,000 $ - $ 60,000 $ -
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FISCAL YEAR 2004/2005
Status Report as of September 30, 2004
Description
FY 2004/2005
FY 2004/2005 Year-End Over/
Year FY 2004/2005 Y-T-D Estimated Under
Dept. Funded . Budget Actuals Actuals Budget
Highway Fund Projects:
Crew-Cab(4-door)Pick-Up Truck _Public Works , 2004/2005 $ 23,000 $ - . $ 23,000 $ -
Pick Up Truck-Traffic Signal Maintenance Public Works 2004/2005 18,000 - 18,000
Replace Three(3)Pick-Up Trucks Public Works 2004/2005 54,000 - 54,000 -
Shadow Mountain Estates Street Improvement Public Works . 2004/2005, 371_,475 , - 371,475 -
Shadow Mountain Estates East Street Improvement Public Works , 2004/2005 98,720 - , 98,720 -
Rancho Verde Street Improvement Public Works 2004/2005 281,970+ - 281,_970 -
Canyon Shadows Street Improvement Public Works 2004/2005 33,180 - 33,180 -
Desert Vista Street Improvement .Public Works 2004/2005. 15,970 _ - 15,970 , -
Naranja Ranch Street Improvement Public Works 2004/2005_ 56,380_ - 56,380 , -
Sun City 13&14 Street Improvement Public Works 2004/2005 24,560 - 24,560 -
Rancho Vistoso 7 Unit 1 Street Improvement Public Works , 2004/2005, 85,740 - , 85,740 , -
Rancho Vistoso NH 7 C&K Street Improvement Public Works _ 2004/2005 28_,415 , - 28,415 -
,
Sunnyslope Street Improvement Public Works 2004/2005 103,620 - 103,620 -
Rancho Feliz(353-389)Street Improvement ,Public Works 2004/2005, 192_,525_ - 192,525 -
Copper Creek Roadway Improvements Public Works 2004/2005 200,000 - 200,000 -
Sidewalk along Rancho Vistoso Blvd.(Arrowsmith to Molina Basin) Public Works 2004/2005 80,000 - 80,000 -
Oro Valley Townhomes Arterial Improvements Public Works _ 2004/2005 100,000 , - , 100,000 -
Palisade Road Improvements ,Public Works , 2004/2005, 200,000 _ 7,330 200,000 -
Sound Wall at Verde Catalina Homes along Oracle-Design ,Public Works . 2004/2005 176,565 . - . 176,565 -
Calle Concordia Improvements(PAG Reimbursement) ,Public Works 2004/2005 565,000 25,610 565,000 -
Pusch Ridge Estates Improvements Public Works 2003/2004 200,000 - 200,000 -
Calle Concordia Improvements Public Works 2003/2004, 31,000 31,000 -
Shannon Road Overlay: Lambert to Naranja Public Works_ 2003/2004 100,000, - 100,000 -
Lomas de Oro Imrovements Public Works _ 2003/2004 174,000 -_ 174,000 . -
Rancho Feliz Improvements
Public Works 2002/2003 250,000 - 250,000 -
Tangerine Heights/Tangerine Meadows Improvements Public Works , 2001/2002 100,000 - 100,000 -
Subtotal Highway Fund . $ 3,564,120 $ 32,940 $ 3,564,120 $ -
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FISCAL YEAR 2004/2005
Status Report as of September 30,2004
Description
FY 2004/2005
FY 2004/2005 Year-End Over/
Year FY 2004/2005 Y-T-D Estimated Under
Dept. Funded Budget Actuals Actuals Budget
Roadway System Capacity Improvement Projects:
La Cholla Safety Improvement Public Works 2004/2005 $ 100,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ -
Magee(Northern to East Town Limits)
Public Works 2004/2005 100,000 - 100,000 -
Lambert Lane/La Cholla Intersection Signal Public Works _ 2004/2005 200,000 _ - 200,000 -
La Canada Drive Widening(Naranja to Tangerine Rd) Public Works 2004/2005 350,000 - 350,000 -
La Canada Drive(Lambert to Calle Concordia) Public Works 2004/2005 11250,000, - 1,250,000 -
Tangerine Road Path(First Ave.to Oracle) Public Works , 2003/2004 75,000 75,000 75,000 -
Tangerine Road,First Avenue to La Canada Drive Public Works 2003/2004 2,830,000_ 148821 2,830,000 -
La Canada Widening:Lambert to Calle Concordia Public Works , 2003/2004. 3,989,666 403,679 , 3,989,666 -
Lambert Lane Safety and Capacity Improvements Public Works 2003/2004_ 487,000 , 377,300 , 487,000 -
Tangerine/La Cholla Improvements Public Works 2003/2004 - 171,110 - -
La Canada Extension Construction Fund Public Works 2004/2005, 4,910,000 366,757_ 4,910,000 -
First Avenue Bridge Construction Fund Public Works 2004/2005_ 3,335,000 103 , 3,335,000 -
Pusch View/Lambert Lane Extension Construction Fund Public Works 2004/2005 3,400,000 749,572 . 3,400,000 -
Oracle Road Improvement District Construction Fund .Public Works 2004/205 5,564,764 706 51564,764 -
Subtotal Roadway System Capacity Improvement Projectsr..7.--7-77.__j $ 26,591,430 $ 2,293,047 $ 26,591,430 $ -
Debt Service:
La Canada Drive Extension Construction Fund Public Works 2004/2005 $ 125,000 $ - _$ 125,000 $ -
Oracle Road Improvement District Debt Service Fund Public Works 2004/2005 631,946 , - 631,946 -
Tanerine Road Widening Public Works 2004/2005 $ 19,977 $ 946,245 , $ 946,245 , $ (926,268)
Subtotal Roadway System Capacity Improvement Debt Service $ 776,923 $ 946,245 $ 1,703,191 $ (926,268)
Subtotal Roadway System Capacity Improvement Projects f--.. --.,;f, $ 27,368,353 _ $ 3,239,292_$ 28,294,621 $ (926,268)
`Stormwater Utility Fund:
Drainage Improvements ,Public Works 2004/2005 $ 195,000 $ - $ 195,000 -
Subtotal Stormwater Utility Fund 1 ;--
.- I $ 195,000 _ $ - $ 195,000 $ -
GRAND TOTAL I _-7 f:' ;.' _ $ 41,501,905] $ 4,227,486 _ $ 42,428,173 I $ (926,268)1
G:WOSEPH\CIP MATERIAL\CIP Status Report 1 Q.XLS
O O O O O O O O o O O O CD O O O O o O o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O tO
O O O O O o O o O O O O N O 0 O 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 1,
O , NO 1,- NU) N- O o 0 0 0 0 CD O O O O O O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C)
Z J O 00 O �- r- N- O CD O N O Cr). C2 N CO CO- O O O N 00 O O O N O CO O O O O 1� O O co- O O
< ~ N CO N N CO N CO O 0 CO OCD N T- CO Tr CO N CO CD N N N N N N V N CO N V CO O N C)
N r C')
O
O 6
0 4A.
10,
CD
.0
44v
o O W
C
O O 0 0
Q o ID
N C CO N O 0 N
N O O O a
1,- N a) CO
C) CO CO
40, 0 M
.,, o
O w
C o
M
CO
• 0 0 0 0 o o 0) V
Q c� C N CO CD O 0 p
'- N N- W- N- to
0 O O O N CO a)
I-
IA
r
in O
CO
Ca CO- CO
rL-+ C.1rte.+ CO O W
C o
• O
O O
o
E N 0 0 0 00 0 0 to..
Q C N CO p r
3 O CD O N
O
44.
LO O
O CD COL
CI) O M
44
.�.. C O
Z C _ _ -
O O
• N M N- N 00
0
0
>. d Q CO 0CO oC O N
J HDJ Z O CO COO a)
Q• W Z 1-- O
LL O Ow
O - - - , , ,
p
cc > 0
J
O 02 00 (0 cr.• W O` N Ni
O a Z c co-W '- 'V' r-
Z O O
J
40) O w
OI- H = c - - - - . - , , _ . _ . ,
a
Q O op 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
✓ Q N CCCCCCCC CCC coocoo a
No O M O CD O O 000 O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 et
C O O N CO .- '- O CD O O C') N CD (D O O r•- O N CO O O O N O CO O O O CD 1- 0 0 0 O O CA
3 N N C') �f C") CO CD CO 1- N r- V CO V N N CO CD N N '�t N N `t* N N '� O N cr) C N C
O C"
1--- In
Ea
412 M CSO C
E
U) CO C Ca
CC▪ C) Q) C) C) C) C) C) a) C) C) v) to v) " 111111111111116 N C
a, U_ U_ U_ U U_ U_ U_ U_ U U Y Y Y Y Y p) C l L N
O O O O O O O O O O CO CO CC CC CO )0 CC CC CC CC CO CC CC CC CO CO CC CO CC - E , f"' E-- , � Co
o a a a a_ 0- a- a CL a. a_ a. a_ a_ a_ a_ a_ a- a a. a. a. a._a_ a a_ a. a. a. a. m CO, a_
0 0
coo ti
u,92 75 to
E ^
o a o CD >.
U N N C CQ E
C .�.i a) Y (I) m
-0 tea), to o CO 0 Q) o0 C
O O C a. Q O
U d 0 ''' J 0 Y (13
.2
Y E 0 ^ rn �' T.
. E U U
o O -0 o O C co o E y .•Y T a 0 O a
E O mQ.
o a c Y ca CO a) t a. Q
r c 5 u) d c,05 u, c) a. ton -� m to c Et
cF o -0 c w a) aE) a U o E x a) o -0 v s c c
o a) aEi o o 2 — o Y E `-;° w m cu aEi '� E �' o . to
v aa)i 92 = 0 'O o to > c° E N a_ O > a 0 o n(
IR 0 ca ,,., co a. ° J O w
Ti v a a. .�.a. .� v Y c Y Cci cti
o n) U_ Q c CO tea) to _ 0 r p o o 3 rn ` 0 ) o ' >o Q E C E -v •- c a)
a. o O C> O O '- Y `' T, 5 , - CC a. +' , > v C O 0) O Lc O-
C ` a) E z C_ U a) N O to i i a. C cm,D a) C c 0 C O U E 0, J Q)
O ca a� a_ � o :2 c E c E F-- E �, `n ,` L o .N o a) E 0- co a) a) Q cc
C U a) >. 0 a) m t 0 > Q ) _cpcami . ct) a) m rn Ai C c N ,1-...., .c2 E m a) n- )0 EG co ) Y O o
.� c) o . a a) .. o a_ ~ o C� m e a v (n v a� N co co m ? °' a F' o
W a- C w N O , N
m > o aa)) aa)i E aa) co > aci rn o °� a = o ° Z Y c -c m a m a) - cc >. H O
0 a) 1 10 E w E °� z E c a o m Y a) c ~ c , p ~ > > Y E a..) cc W 0 _ 6 ` cu o. Z 0
r,, 2c o E o a) o to a) c a) ce w a. o o dS a) x
U Ui.t ct U N -2 J -° Ca O .C CD to 2 L '5 3 &U w vO U 0 = N C �O E % < o
a_ v co ° a w c a cv p Y LL c cv ca c o Y m m Y O - E t >. r-
.`...., Z o c a) '. C� a_
o �? a) a aa) ° Q o aa) O o 0 cu o o .`') cu m co ca U ca cv a) o o •m a) a) o o a) .0 o c
CL it C) C CL 0 CC a. I-- I- CC a 0 m 0 , z a. n_ -, a a a a_ U) U) ,- H CC > C.) U U) a. .z _ a U
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000_
2,— v--0-0-0-Lo-u-,-c to o o ori Qi o 0 0 O.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o cn ori o
re
et N 1` ch N N N N O 0) 0 0 (0 (0 0 (0 0 0 0 0 CO N 1� 0 ,i
r r- O) CC) Cr) N CO COCO N to
H
to to
Li)
L
W
C OT 1i4
E p0 0 0 0 0
a• N 0 0 0 0 0
CO O O O O
3 o r- NN 1`
O N
F-
10,
0 0
` 0 0
d O 0
N• O
r O 0
cc
• co
E0 0 0 0 00 0 0
Q N c 0 0 00 0 0
35 d 0 0 in' ori
O O N O N CCO
CO
F-
Eft
L '
a)
t
40 6
C O 1i,
O• o0 0
E N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Q c
3 O O 0 0 0 0 CO N O
O CO N (� �t e-- N CO
H
69
z a)
Q -111
N, O
a t.
0
t�
J H 0 = co ,
J z o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Q W Z E o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
> m E a N 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D o o 0
W of 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
COQ00) 00cn00cn 006
O — e- ch N el N CD v N CO
u. a = 14
Om0
3Q =
O I.-
.c
Q w 6
V c o 19
• u)
O 0
E0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o 0
Q N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _
3 L is N 1� cM _ N N N N O
O r- v
F-
to U,
c
W V) V' V) V) V) V) V' V) V) V' V) V' V' N V) V) V) V' V' V) V) V' V' V) V) V) V) V)
E Y Y Y - Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
1 00000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
a 'S
a) 0 V U U 2 2 U U U 2 C) ,0 ,U ,2 ,U ,U U ,U ,U ,U ,C) ,U ,O ,C) ,O ,C) C) ,C)
.n .a .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .a .0 .n .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 ID .o .0 .0 .0 .0
> > > > > = O 7 > > > > > > = > > > > > > > > > > 7 > >
I1 a Il a a 11 a n. CL Il Il a a Il CL Il a Il a a a a a. Il Il CL a a
O X
a) a� a)
a c
a) a) .• 45
m a� c c `
•:° U) U -5o a) m to
o ami
O U O V)
a)
V)
(� U �� = cn
° o rn o6 2 o c v Y a) "'E' = V) V' > C a) U)
.. a' a) a) a) o rn L 0 > N
F- co E 0 N v E a E co o E -o t •' U 0 m 8 C V a)
cv a) a) co ca
=-c a? m a W L) cc U com 0..Q o .u�i 4-. .0)o o > cr
c Y U .. a5 co Y O �'si, D co .0 W W c > c o J t)
• v J oz-- c = 0 = c c a 'c 'al m = '� ' Q o
a
= 3.23
(� m ,- co Co W > co co O c� u) ai 0 0 Q H 0
.` a) O 'C7 C33 r (7 ~ x m J Y a) > Y C C CZ co > u .� N a) 0 oN
'a o N c c cv v v o- co co co U . = a) a) > > O Z co W co Y a) co > h-
s co Co EL d i C C C 0 a) 0 O O , C d V_' U c ;,,
0 a W -0- N ~ c-' in in in a F`- (n .?�U 3 3 o r o o i� a`) Q 0
d 0 N it oa O U C) C) N U a 0 0 > = m > a)U �.,a. 0 g LL' a
> C C +' Y = E E ' Y $2 a) C L1 co Co C U — O 'D C E w co co 0 U
O` O O S a O ._.V --- Lu. ED. N U >>O : = 0 L .0 > Co co '- 0 co = a) T. a)
d ccC0 (nin2cn0DF-- F- F- 0- s Cl) u) 0u) C/) 0 _J00mcc0C/) - cc 0-
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
p 414 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Z J ,- 0 0 0 0 0 OD- 0 0 0 0 0 ori 0 0 0
< Q C CO 0 ►n 0 0 - 0 0 0 cD 0 CO) o 0
re H 0 CD 0 C) 0 0 V ,- ,- 0 a) in et
0 O v. cn cr) N co- ,- Cr) N U) N ,- tv
H
d, fa
O0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
L 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 CD
;' O O O L. 0
60, r- N N `'" O
C o 6R 69
O O
O O 0 0
E0
0
N o o 0 O O
C O Oco 0 O0 00 0
CO
H0 CO N 0 'n 0N
fa
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
L.
to O O
d 0 0 O O O 0 O
0 inn N N CD 0 O
IA W 6 O N r
co
0 0
. N o o O o
Q O
c o o O
rn rn
o I- 0 N CO
fA
O O O
._ O O 0
a) O O O
O CD
+L+ r r O N-
U)
p t O N T ch
Z +� CO EA
O
LL 0 0 -
N
O 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lu O O O O 0
W Q c0 O O
o f"• 0 CD o N 0 0 N 0n 0
Z v H el
-
< Q 41,
a-
>.
>. d 2 O O o 0 0
W Cl) z... O o 0 0 0
J Z Z a) O 0 m O c
w O Cp C) 0
r-+
> w d 4.r► ti cn r. .4--
0 >re
p c o to
w = (C)
LL a > E o 0 0
0 0
0 0 0
W N0
0 2 0 Q C O O O O O O
O
3 JQ Q O CO N 0 0o N 0
H a o Eft
0 0o
re o 0 0 o O
O o O o O
0 0 0 O 0 O O
5 Lt)Un O C
ZNO N
Cn c 00
Z w
O c c
U) 64 69
1. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Q NCD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
c0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 O in 0 0 0 0 in N 0 0 00
0 CO N 0 0
H CYi - - N
Ea
;' U) U) U) CO U) U) U) U) Un U) U) CO CO U) U) U)
Cl Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y _ .]C .1C .)C Y .
E o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
t
a 0 o ci ci ci U ci U U .V C) .0 .o .0 .C) .C)
p = .0 > > > > > > > > = .0 > > =
a a a a a a a. a a. a a a a a. a s
A co o
E w a c
c c co
3 •C i. Cc a)
C O O ca C Cl
0 v N 0 0 F- [>
W w Cl m c H ... 0 O O y
C X
> - , O c c O O N
Cl cn c > E "' " a, O rn
v, c O — cc E U _ ..
t a E •4 ; 3 0 .E c Cl m 0 Cl
vvi m •`. O C co cC U a) 0
-o c p H u, Z m Cl
a.O a, c 3 H >a)
o mo
c V E H s c c •N ami c cm N
o 0, > N u, ca > co .E 0 c .0 0 C (
a- c ii -ca) o. W U 0 .00 -° N CO 13
0 c -v m E ° O J V U a? W J N a.
C * m
0- ° N ,?r c •v = J Cl c > > 0 0 5
U a) U ca co cv •
v0 Cl Cl c 4- s a o U O 0 a) 0 o o (
y c c m co r o co c c� r O O U) v,
CC J Z c Cl Cl "', J V 0 V 'fl > >
+, 'C V v, 2 Cl c •o iC
V O z Co O O O
0 Cl Cl 0 Q J a) •c ,, CCa >. N N U 0
.0 U v)Cl , 0 0) ca E U '2 U U c c
0- CC CO J U U H Z CC)
J I J J 0 ce
PROJECT SHEET
FY
2005— '06 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
• Victorias umber:
Fire Systems for Crown �N
PROJECT NAME: Panel Vehicular Protection
Department: Police
Department Priority:
Description: 'stin 2005 Crown Victoria police vehicles with"Fire
1. Project Equip/Retrofit existing prethis
ProtectionThese arepanels attached to the fuel tanks. The premise of
Panel Vehicular Systems".protectionis
• tank with some object that would puncture or ignite the
that to reach the fuel cell or the .rotective wra. containin• fire su••ressin• a.ent. The .uncturin•
fuel it must first sass throw�h - and
thisreleases a cloud of fire suppressing powder,which "inerts" the space aro
of protective wrap pp
tin the ignition of the fuel or quickly suppressing a fire.
the fuel cell/tank,thereby preventing .� N/A
No List
Is this a rollover project? any FY that it was previously funded in:
2. Project Location(if applicable):
Police Department/ Town wide
this project improve public health, safety, and welfare? - •
3. How does p J p
mainly to rear end impact of Crown Victoria Police vehicles
Reduces the chance of a fire due m y p
How does this project support stated community goals?
p J
4. n
Supports community policing for a safer community including the public safety workers
thisthe Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
5. How does project impact • ,
of thepublic safetypersonnel in all activities where the Crown
A. Allows for additional safety
Victoria vehicle is utilized.'zed. May avoid some of the expense related to traffic accident and injury
liability costs.
B. Continued use of our pre 2005 Crown Victoria vehicles will present a danger of rear impact
collision and injury due to fire danger.
thiseffect on Town's service levels, A.)
6. How does project have an if funded B.) if not funded?
A. May avoid injury to public c safety
personnel and related recovery time for these personnel
B. Could result in extended time off if fire related injury occurs
Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
7. How does this project impactp Systems"
are no maintenance costs associated with"Fire Panel Vehicular Protection after
initial installation
• answer a threateninglitigious situation or a legal mandate?
8. Does this project e of a known
We could be liable for loss due to fire related injury. We would not be taking advantage
to collisions involving Crown to reduce damage and injury related Victoria vehicles All
new 2005 and later Crown Victoriespurchasedby
the Police Department will include the advanced
em first offered by Ford Motor company in the 2005 models .
fire suppression syst
thisproject(s)s to create significant savings of time,money, and
9. Is project coordinated with other p J ( )
p J
convenience?No
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$,000)
PROJECT NAME: Fire Panel Vehicular Protection Systems for Crown Victorian lumber:
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list(in thousands of dollars)the total project cost,the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
FiscalTotal Town Outside Funds Outside Funds I Outside Funds
Year
Cost Funds Amount i Source Amount I Source 1 Amount I Source
1
I C �
2005 — '06$20.2 $20.2 $ _ .$ $
2006—`07$ $ $ _ $ $
2007— `08$ $ .$ $ ,$
2008— `09$ $ $ _ ,$ $
2009— '10$ $ $ $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&11 ) COSTS
Please list(in thousands of dollars)the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs,etc.) in the Savings columns. The"Total Cost" for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscall Total Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
Year
Cost Personnel Other { Amount j Source Amount I Source
2005 —`06 $ $ $ $
2006—`07 $ $ .$ - $
2007—`08 $ $ _ $ - $
2008— `09 $ $ $ $
2009— '10 $ $ $ � $
EVALUATION(for TAC use only)
Assumption Project:Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health,Safety,Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005— '06 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
• "generation 3" Glock model22 pistols Number:
PROJECT NAME: Glock Pistol upgrade to g
Department: Police Department Priority:
1. Project Description:tion: Provide all officers with the new 3rd Generation Glock 22 pistols including
pistol mounted lights( light mounted with the rails available on the Pgeneration Glocks) and
required holsters. These guns have also gone through upgrades with trigger pins magazines and
Tri erpins havepresented a problem with a number of our current guns in the past. This
springs. ��
includes a trade allowance of $18k for 60 current weapons that the Glock reps will take on trade.
Is this a rolloverJro'ect? No List any FY that it was previously funded in: N/A
P
2. Project Location(if applicable):
Police Department/Town wide
3. How does this project improve public health, safety, and welfare?
3rd Generation Glocks with attached lights allow law enforcement officers to utilize one hand for
light source and weapon during the most dangerous tactical situations improving their chances to
g P
defend themselves and remain safe in these situations.
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
Supportscommunitypolicing for a safer community including the safety public safety workers
PP
5. How does thisJ
ro'ect impact the Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
P
A. Allows for additional safety of the public safety personnel and public in all night time or reduced
li•htin. situations re•uirin• the de do ment of the sistol. This ma avoid some of the ex•ense
related to injuryliability costs for public safety personnel and public involved in these situations.
B. Continued use of our current equipment and tactics may result in injury claims and officer
recovery time off that could be avoided by the use of the 3rd generation Glocks with lights.
6. How does thisJ ro'ect have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
P
A. May avoid injury to public safety personnel and related recovery time for these personnel
B. Could result in extended time off for public safety personnel if injury occurs that may have been
row
avoided through the use of the 3rd generation Glocks equipped with lighting systems.
g
7. How does this project impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
There are maintenance costs associated with the surchase of batteries as necessa for the lis htin•
systems. There should be some minor reduced costs for maintenance of issued pistols due to the
disposal (trade) of the oldest ones.
8. Does thisP roj ect answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
We could be liable for loss due to injury related to the use of tactics and equipment not recognized as
the most advanced that is available.
9. Is thisJro'ect coordinated with other project(s)to create significant savings of time, money, and
P
Yes, we have been purchasingand will continue to purchase 3rd generation Glocks
convenience?
through the normal budget process to provide for additional personnel. This will allow us to have one
standard upgraded pistol and lighting system issued to all Officers.
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands-4,000)
PROJECT NAME: Glock Pistol upgrade to "generation 3" Glock model 22 pistols Number:
PST
CAPITAL COSTS
dollars)the total project cost,the capital funds requested from the Town, all
Please list(in thousands of P J
probable outside funding
sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and d funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
• Outside Funds Outside Funds Outside Funds
Fiscal Total Town _
Cost Funds Amount Source Amount Source _ Amount _ Source
Year
06$3
2005 — ` 8.0 $20.0 $18.0* Trade in $ $
value
2006— 07$ $ $
2007— 08$ $ $ $ $-
2008 09$ $ _ ,$ $
2009 10$
$ $ $ -$
* $18k is trade in value that has already been deducted from the total funding request
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
Please list(in thousands of dollars)the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and d so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements,
deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The "Total Cost"for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
• Costs Projected Savings , Projected Savings
Fiscal Total �
Year
Cost Personnel Other Amount Source Amount Source
$ $
Zoos .
2006
— `07 $.5 $ $ -$
2007—'08 $.5 $ $ $
2008—'09 $.5 $ $ $
— `10 $.5 $ _ $ _ $
2009
EVALUATION(for TAC use only)
Assumption Project:Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety, Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005— '06 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
PROJECT NAME: In-Car Video System replacement and addition Number:
Department: Police Department Priority:
1. Project Description:
t Provide 3 replacement in-car video systems and one additional system. We
currently use in-car video for both DUI enforcement units and we have one additional unit equipped
with y
in-car
p
video to deploy as needed and utilize as a spare when the primary DUI units are out of
service for repairs. We would like to equip the aggressive driving enforcement vehicle with in-car
p
video system as well. Current In-car video systems are old technology dating back at least six
years, one was actually purchased in 1994.
project?Is this a rollover No List any FY that it was previously funded in: N/A
2. Project Location (if applicable):
Police Department/Town wide
3. How does thisp roj ect improve public health, safety, and welfare?
Allows
officers to •ather evidence to assist in the •rosecution of a vane of offenses includin• DUI
_
drivers and aggressive drivers. The ability to prosecute and remove these drivers from the streets is a
major step in improving the health, safety and welfare of everyone using the street's and highways.
provg
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
Supports community policingfor a safer community including the safety of the motoring public.
How does this project impact the Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A.5. p
Video evidence of criminal activity and driving violations often times negates the need for drawn
legalprocess. Defendants typicallyplead out more often when video evidence is presented which
out will save the Town in all areas related to the cost (ie. overtime pay & court costs) of investigation
and prosecution .
B. equipment Current in-car video e ui ment is so old that it has become unreliable and expensive to repair.
This inabilityto consistentlygain video evidence will keep investigative and prosecution related
costs
highalongwith the high cost of repairs and maintenance of the old equipment.
g
doesthis project have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
6. How
A. More efficient use of investigative, patrol and prosecution time and resources will allow more
time forp roactive police service.
B. Could result in degradation of service related to the extra time spent in investigative and
prosecution related activities.
7. How does thisp roj ect impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
Maintenance costs related to repair of old in-car video equipment will be eliminated.
8. Does thisJro'ect answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
p
There could be liabilityrelated to ineffective prosecution of DUI and aggressive drivers if
prosecution fails due to the use of unreliable equipment or equipment not recognized as the most
advanced that is available.
project Is Jro
this 'ect coordinated with other project(s) to create significant savings of time,money, and
convenience?Yes, we would install the in-car video systems at the same time new vehicles are
equipped and outfitted.
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands-4, 000)
PROJECT NAME: In-Car Video System replacement and addition Number: I
p
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list(in thousands of dollars)the total project cost, the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
e Funds Outside Funds
Total Town Outside Funds Outside
Year Cost Funds Amount Source Amount Source Amount Source
2005 — `06$43.5 $32.0 $11.5* GOHS $ $
GRANT
2006— `07$ $ _$ $ $
2007— `08$ $ $ $
2008— `09$ $ $ $ $ .
2009— `10$ $ $ $ $
* $11.5k is a pending GOHS GRANT request for partial funding of 2 video systems
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
Please list(in thousands of dollars) the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements,rovements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The"Total Cost"for each year
p
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total CostsProjected Savings Projected Savings
_
Year Cost Personnel Other Amount Source Amount _ Source
2005— `06 $.5 $ $1.5 Maint. $
2006— `07 $.5 $ _ $1.5 Maint. $
2007—'08 $.5 $ $1.5 Maint. $
2008—'09 $.5 $ $ $
2009— `10 $.5 $ _ $ _$
EVALUATION(for TAC use only)
Assumption Project: Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety,Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005— '06 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
Mobile Data Computer
PROJECT NAME: Replacement of Patrol CarSystems Number: I P
Department: Police Department Priority:
1. Project Description: Provides for replacement of oldest mobile data computer systems which have
been in use for 5 plus years.
Is this a rolloverPJro'ect? No List any FY that it was previously funded in: N/A
2. Project Location (if applicable):
Police Dept. - Town wide
3. How does this project improve public health, safety, and welfare?
Su••orts communi •olicin. and decentralization allowin. for the efficient flow of sublic safe
and emergency information between patrols dispatch and the Az. Criminal justice information
g Y
system.
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
Supports community_policing for a safer community
5. How does thisJro'ect impact the Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
P
A. Efficiency pJ ro'ect to help eliminate excessive repetitive service interruptions allowing officers to
respond in a timely manner to calls for service
B. Lack of timely information due to "down" equipment could delay response to calls for service.
Reduces costly maintenance and repair of old mobile data computer systems.
6. How does thisJ ro'ect have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
P
A. Allows officers to respond more quickly and efficiently to calls for service
B. Could delay officers response to calls for service
7. How does this project impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
Reduces high maintenance costs related to the use of old computer equipment
8. Does thisP roj ect answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
If we are unable to respond to emergency calls for service in the most timely manner we could be
liable for loss and injury due to an extended response time.
project coordinated with other project(s)to create significant savings of time, money, and
9. Is this p J P
convenience
convenience?
Purchased and installed at the same time we outfit new patrol vehicles
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$,000)
Car Mobile Data Computer
PROJECT NAME: Replacement of PatrolSystems Number: I p
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars)the total project cost,the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs,funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Outside Funds
Year Cost Funds Amount Source _ Amount Source _ Amount Source
2005 — '06$48.3 $48.3 $ ,$ $ _
2006— '07$49.7 $49.7 $ $ $
2007— `08$51.2 $51.2 $ $ $
_
2008 — '09$52.8 $52.8 $ _ ,$ .$ _
2009— '10$79.2 $79.2 $ 1 $ $
OPERATING AND MMNTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
Please list(in thousands of dollars)the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements,rovements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The"Total Cost" for each year
p
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings _ Projected Savings
Year
Cost Personnel Other Amount _ Source _ Amount Source
l
2005 — `06 $ $ $2.2 Maint. _$
2006— `07 $ $ $2.3 Maint. $
2007—'08 $ $ $2.4 Maint. $
2008— '09 $ $ 2.5 Maint. $
2009— '10 $ $ $3.7 Maint. $ 1
EVALUATION (for TAC use only)
Assumption Project:Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety,Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels _ 1
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005— '06 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
PROJECT NAME: Opticom Emitters Number:
Department: Police Department Priority:
1. Project Description: qp patrol E ui vehicles with Opticom emitters. Opticom is a priority control
traffic signal system that givesany authorized vehicle the individual capability to move through
traffic without
undul disru'tin. si• al s nchronization or other traffic. This occurs in an orderly
_ accounts for cross traffic,pedestrians, and traffic engineering requirements. The
fashion that
emer•enc• vehicle rains the ri•ht-of-wa from the shase selector in a manner that a.sears normal.
_ _
After the Opticomsystem
responds to the emitter and changes to green it will recycle through the
P
without notice. Opticom is directional, it only goes where the emergency vehicle goes
signals
without disrupting parallel traffic intersections.
Is this a rollover project?ect? No List any FY that it was previously funded in: N/A
2. Project Location(if applicable):
Police Department/Town wide
3. How does thisroj ect improve public health, safety,and welfare?
p ' er•enc vehicles to re•nest and
The 0 sticom s stem enhances time-critical travel b allowin em
receive green lights at traffic signal locations as they go to emergency calls for service.
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
Supports community policing for a safer community
5. How does this project impact the Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
Allows for a safer emer enc res onse to calls which will promote traffic accident reduction
A. emergency p
involvin•
• our res•onse to calls. Would avoid some of the ex•ense related to traffic accident liabili
_
and repair costs.
As con estion increases our res onse to emergency calls for service will present increasing
B. traffic g p
danger of collisioninjuryin
and signalized intersections. This may result in increased costs related to
�
traffic collisions associated with emer•enc res•onse and liabili insurance
project How does Jro
this 'ect have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A.
Allows officers to respond more quickly and efficiently to emergency calls for service
B. Could delay officers response to calls for service
7. How does thisJro'ect impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
p
Maintenance of emitters is projected to negligible in cost and this should be offset by some minor
expected g as patrol maintenancecost savings vehicles should be driven with less severe braking and
acceleration to emergency calls
8. Does thisJro'ect answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
p
If we are unable to respond to emergency calls for service in the most timely manner we could be
_
liable for loss injury due to an extended response time. We would not be taking advantage of a
and
technologyto reduce damage and injury during emergency responses for Police service.
known g
project coordinated with other project(s)to create significant savings of time, money, and
9. Is this p
Some will be purchased and installed at the same time we outfit new patrol vehicles
convenience?
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$, 000)
-
PROJECT NAME: Opticom Emitters Number:
CAPITAL COSTS
of dollars)the total project cost,the capital funds requested from the Town, all
Please list(in thousands
probable outside fundingsources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal
Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Outside Funds
Cost Funds Amount - Source Amount Source Amount Source
Year
'06
2005
— $31.5 $31.5 $ $ $
$ $
2006— '07$ $ $ _
2007 $ $ $ $ .$
2008
— `09$ $ $ $ $
2009 $ $ $ S $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
Please list(in thousands of dollars)the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel,
leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
p
(efficiency
improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The"Total Cost" for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
• Costs Projected Savings , Projected Savings
Fiscal Total �
Yea
r Cost Personnel Other Amount 1 Source _ Amount Source
2005 — `06 $ $ $ $
2006
— `07 $ $ $ .$
2007— `08 $ $ $ $
2008—`09 $ $ .$ $
2009— '10 $ $ $ -- $
EVALUATION(for TAC use only)
Assumption Project: Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety, Welfare , Impact on Operation and Maintenance
ty
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005— '06 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
PROJECT NAME: Replacement Patrol Vehicles Number:
Department: Police Department Priority:
.
Provides for re
placement of 14 older police units in excess of 100,000 miles
1. Project Description. p
per town policy-SOP (no re 04/05 lacement patrol vehicles were funded, 6 from the 03/04
#34. P
rollover were funded for 04/05) Equipment for vehicles (i.e. radio, siren light bar, cage,graphics
etc.) in regular police non budget. Possibly one to three marked motor units may be included in
cap
the total depending
on the fleet management evaluation at time of availability and purchase of
Crown Victoria's.
Is this a rolloverproject?'ect? No List any FY that it was previously funded in: N/A _
2. Project Location(if applicable):
Police Dept.—Town wide
3. How does thisJro'ect improve public health, safety, and welfare?
p
Supports community policing and decentralization while promoting a secure atmosphere for all
residents. Allows us to purchasereplacement lacement patrol vehicles with the advanced fire suppression
p
s stem first available in the 2005 Ford Police Crown Victoria Interceptor
4. How does thisJ ro'ect support stated community goals?
p
Supports community policing for a safer community.
5. How does this projectimpact im the Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. Efficiency project
to helpeliminate excessive,repetitive breakdowns allowing officers to respond
in a timely manner to calls for service.
B. Excessive breakdowns and maintenance will take Police officers off the street while they are
switchingout vehicles or getting them to repair services. Excessive service expense.
6. How does this project have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. Restores vehicles to service level of SOP #34
B. Vehicles would be o•erated that do not corns]. with SOP #34
How does this project impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
7. p
Reduces high maintenance, major overhauls necessary as police patrol vehicles exceed 1000,000
miles
8. Does this project answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
sus ension/steerin /braking systems could lead to serious accidents Allows us to
Broken/worng p
lacement patrol vehicles with the advanced fire suppression system first available in the
purchase rep
2005 Ford Police Crown Victoria Interceptor
coordinated with other project(s) to create significant savings of time, money, and
9. Is this project
convenience?
Purchased with unmarked police vehicles and replacement MDC systems.
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$,000)
PROJECT NAME: Re•lacement Patrol Vehicles es Number:
CAPITAL COSTS
ect cost the Please list(in thousands of dollars)the totalproject� capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding
sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Outside Funds
Year Cost Funds Amount Source Amount Source Amount Source
— ` $361.6 $361.6 $ $ _ $
2005 06 _
$
2006— '07 186.2 $186.2 $ $ $
$ .$ $08`
2007— 191.8 $191.8 $ _
09$
2008— ` 197.6 $197.6 $ $
$
2009 - 290.5 10` $290.7 $ $ $ 1
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
Please list(in thousands of dollars)the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases,
and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The"Total Cost" for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
'�
Year
Cost Personnel Other Amount _ Source Amount Source
06`
2005 — ($58.8) $0 $58.8 Maint. $
i
($30.9)2006— 07` $0 $30.9 Maint. $
($32.4)2007- 08` $0 $32.4 Maint. ,$
008— ($34.) $0 $34. Maint. $
2 `09
2009 - `10 ($51) $0 $51 Maint. $
EVALUATION(for TAC use only)
Assumption Project:Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety, Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005—`06 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
• •
PROJECT NAME: Property & ID Addition Number:
Department:• Police Department Priority:
1. Project Description:cri tion: Develop ment plan/construction of new police property & ID addition.
3500 sq. ft. Moveable state of art shelving, flush station, fume hood, #1 security for drugs/weapons.
this a rollover project? No List any FY that it was previously funded in: N/A
Is p t
2. Project Location(if applicable):
Hall /Police department complex 11,000 N. La Canada,Preferably a free standing
Town p
Gated north of secured parking area or an addition on the south east section of the Police
structure located
facility.
3. How does thisp roject improve Public Health, Safety, and Welfare?
p
Current space maxed out. We now have three 8' x 40' and one 8 x 20 storage containers full of
and evidence items. These storage containers are located at 11,000 N. La Canada
primarily property
and
680 W. Calle Concordia. Property/I.D. technicians are approaching OSHA limits related to
ace
s movement re uirements and load lifting levels as there is no space for lifting equipment.
� q
Needrefrigeration more refri eration for blood,DNA,homicide, sexual assault evidence and approved
ventilation s stems for handlin• and .rocessin• of such materials..
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
Enhancesp rofessional community policing efforts and allows for continued compliance with State
and Federal ADOSH/OSHA statutes.
How does this project impact the Town's fiscal resources? A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
5. p
Items stored in consistentpackaging on moveable shelves eliminating many aisles provides for
a. _more to be stored in less space and safely accessed by dept. personnel more efficiently. We
anticipate selling3 current convex storage units for approximately $9000.00 total.
p
b. Forced to add several 8X40 storage containers or rent commercial storage space. Increased
staffin• to evaluate and maintain ADOSH/OSHA corn'Hance.
How does this project have an effect on Town's service levels? A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
6. p t _ .
a. Kee is all items orderl in one location for •uicker retrieval through systematic storage. ._
b. Customers will be forced to wait while we travel to different storage locations and/or move
other property to get to required property
7. How does thisp roject impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
More efficient staff and ID operations. Much lower maintenance than most bldgs due to absence
of windows, skylights, numerous doors or small offices.
8. Does thisJ
ro'ect answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
p
Wouldone et storage container out of 680 W Calle Concordia and keep out additional storage
g g
containers there. Would help us avoid ADOSH/OSHA compliance issues.
project Is Jro
this 'ect coordinated with other project(s) to create significant savings of time, money, and
convenience?
* Possibly a Library parking expansion project &the bar-coding property management system_
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$,000)
PROJECT NAME: Property & ID Addition Number:
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list(in thousands of dollars)the total project cost,the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Carry Banked
ear Cost Funds Amount Source Amount Source Forward _ Funds
2005— `06$785 $785 $ ? * _Bonds? * $ $ $
2006— `07$ $ $ $ .$ $
2007— '08,$ $ $ .$ _ $ $
2008— '09,$ $ $ $ $ $
2009— '10$ $ $ $ $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
Please list(in thousands of dollars)the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The"Total Cost" for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
IFiscalyTotal Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
ear _ Cost Personnel_ Other Amount_ Source Amount Source
2005 — '06 $.5 $ $ $9 Sale of storage $
units
2006— '07 $.5 $ $ $4.5 No new storage $
unit purchase
2007— `08 $.5 $ $ $5 No new storage $
unit purchase
2008— '09 $.6 $ $ $5.5 No new storage $
unit purchase
2009—'10 $.6 $ $ $6 No new storage $
unit purchase
EVALUATION(for TAC use only)
Assumption Project: Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety, Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005— '06 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
PROJECT NAME: TASER non-lethal, conducted energy weapons Number: I
Department: Police Department Priority:
1. p
Project Description:Provide all officers with TASER non-lethal, conducted energy weapons. TASER
products are used by over 6,000 police departments in the United States and abroad , and hundreds
ofpolice departments- including Phoenix, San Diego, Sacramento, Albuquerque, Pima County and
p
Reno—have purchased TASER products for every patrol officer.
Is this a rolloverp roj ect? No List any FY that it was previously funded in: N/A
2. Project Location(if applicable):
Police Department/Town wide
3. How does this project improve public health, safety, and welfare?
TASERs enable law enforcement officers to effectively face violent situations and keep our
communities safe. TASERs reduce officer shootings and suspect injuries, and their design allows for
their use as valuable protection devices that help ensure the security of our communities.
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
Supports community policing for a safer community including the safety public safety workers
5. How does this project impact the Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. Allows for additional safety of the public safety personnel in all activities where physical force is
likely in dealing with suspects. May avoid some of the expense related to injury liability costs for
public safety personnel and suspects.
B. Continued use of our current equipment and tactics may result in injury claims and officer
recovery time off that could be avoided by the use of the TASER system technology,
6. How does this project have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. May avoid injury to public safety personnel and related recovery time for these personnel
B. Could result in extended time off for public safety personnel if a use of force injury occurs that
may have been avoided through the use of the TASER system technology.
7. How does this project impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
There are maintenance costs associated with the purchase of batteries every two years($35 per
TASER) and the purchase of cartridges for training new operators.
8. Does this project answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
We could be liable for loss due to use of force related injury to suspects and public safety personnel.
We would not be taking advantage of a known technology to reduce injury related to use of force
situations.
9. Is this project coordinated with other project(s) to create significant savings of time,money, and
convenience? Yes, we have a$5000.00 grant from the"100 Club for the purchase of 5 TASERS &
we are purchasing an additional 12 TASERS out of our regular SWAT budget for the SWAT
Officers who will be participating in the Pima Regional SWAT team. We will be purchasing the
required tracking software kit with the grant funds. Instructors will be trained,training curriculum
and rules and procedures will be in place.
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$, 000)
conducted
PROJECT NAME: TASER non-lethal, y weaons Number: 1
energy P
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list(in thousands of dollars)the total project cost,the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds _ Outside Funds Outside Funds
_
Year
Cost Funds Amount Source Amount Source Amount Source
2005 — '06$66.0 $66.0 $ $ _ $
2006— `07$ $ $ $ .$
2007— `08$ $ $ $ $
2008 — `09$ $ $ _ $ $
2009— `10$ $ $ _ _$ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
Please list(in thousands of dollars)the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements,rovements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The"Total Cost"for each year
p
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal
Total Costs Projected Savings . Projected Savings
Year Cost Personnel Other Amount Source Amount Source
2005 — `06 $ ,$ �$ .$ _
2006— `07 $ _$ $1.4 $ $
2007— '08 $ $ $2.8 _$ ,$ _
2008— '09 $ $ $2.9 $ $
2009— '10 $ $ $3.0 _$ 1 �$
EVALUATION(for TAC use only)
Assumption Project: Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety,Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels .
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2006—406 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
PROJECT NAME: Town Service Center& Police substation Number: I
Department: Town (completed by the Police Department) Department Priority:
p
1. Project Description: Purchase land, develop, plan and construct new 15,000 to 20,000 sq. ft
Town Service Center& Police substation.
Is this a rolloverP roject? No List any FY that it was previously funded in: N/A _
2. Project Location (if applicable):
Located near southern boundary of Oro Valley Town limits.
3. How does this project improve Public Health, Safety, and Welfare?
Current Town/Police facility space maxed out. Locates Town/Police services to provide for less
travel to obtain Town services. Provides adequate space to comply with staff workspace and
movement standards.
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
EnhancesP rofessional community policing efforts and allows for continued compliance with State
and Federal ADOSH /OSHA statutes. Brings services closer to a large number of customers.
P
Maintains open space near Town facilities by avoiding encroachment from continued facility
_
expansion and parking lot construction at existing locations.
5. How does this project impact the Town's fiscal resources? A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
a. Avoids continued expansion and intrusive/expensive"add-on" construction at the Town Hall
Complex that interferes with service levels and productivity. Efficient use of space and resources
b all Town services sharin• some areas of a facili .
b. Continued negative impact on productivity due to intrusive"add-on" construction projects at
current facilities.
6. How does this project have an effect on Town's service levels? A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
a. Increases service location options resulting in less travel and time for customers.
b. Customers will be forced to travel to crowded service locations with increased wait times.
7. How does this project impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
More efficient staff operations. Lower individual maintenance costs by facility sharing practices
between Town Departments. Eliminates rental expense @ Oracle & Magee
8. Does this project answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
Possibili of relocatin• some of 680 W Calle Concordia staff and li ht e•ui.ment. Would hel• us
avoid ADOSH/OSHA compliance issues.
9. Is thisJ
roject coordinated with other project(s)to create significant savings of time,money, and
P
convenience?
Combine resources of many departments for one shared facility rather than each department
searching for facility space solution.
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands-4, 000)
PROJECT NAME: Town Service Center& Police substation Number:
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars)the total project cost,the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Outside Funds
Year Cost Funds Amount Source Amount Source Amount Source
2005— `06 $ $ $ $ $
2006— `07 $5000 $5000 $ Bonds? $ $
2007— `08 $ $ $ $ $
2008— `09 $ $ $ $ $
2009— '10 $ $ $ $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars)the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The"Total Cost" for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
Year Cost Personnel Other Amount Source Amount Source
2005— `06 $ $ $ $
2006— '07 $11.1 $ $47.2 lease canceled $
2007— '08 $11.7 $ $50 lease canceled $
2008— '09 $12.4 $ $52.5 lease canceled $
2009— `10 $13 $ $55 lease canceled $
EVALUATION(for TAC use only)
Assumption Project:Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety,Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005– '06 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
PROJECT NAME: Replacement Unmarked Police Vehicles Number: I
Department:artment: Police Department Priority:
1. ect Project Description: Provides for replacement of older unmarked police units in excess of 100,000
milesper town policy–SOP #34 (no replacement unmarked police vehicles were funded in 04/05)
Is this a rolloverJro'ect? jp List any FY that it was previously funded in: N/A
p
2. Project Location(if applicable):
Police Department - Town wide —
3. How does this project improve Public Health, Safety, and Welfare?
Provides dependable transportation for critical personnel in department; such as Detectives.,
Investigators, Training Officers, Professional Standards Personnel & Professional Development
Administrator and personnel for support in times of crisis.
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
ForP ublic safety: provides for critical personnel to be readily available for support. Allows
personnel to complete investigations, coordinate, plan, schedule, attend, instruct, etc., in a variety of
locations. Such as Detectives,Investigators, Training Officers, Professional Standards Personnel &
Prof. Dev. Admin . and •ersonnel for sus sort in times of crisis.
5. How does this project impact the Town's fiscal resources?
a. Efficiencyproject to help eliminate excessive repetitive breakdowns allowing personnel to
respond in a timely manner. —
b. Excessive breakdowns and maintenance will take personnel away from operations while they
are switching_out vehicles or getting them to repair services. Excessive service expense.
6. How does this project have an effect on Town's service levels?
a. Restores vehicles to service level of SOP #34
b. Vehicles would be operated that do not comply with SOP#34
7. How does this project impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
Reduces high maintenance,major overhauls necessary as vehicles exceed 100,000 miles
8. Does thisp roject answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
Broken/worn suspension/steering/braking systems could lead to serious accidents
9. Is thisJro'ect coordinated with other project(s)to create significant savings of time,money, and
p
convenience?
Purchased and e•ui••ed with marked •atrol vehicles
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands-4, 000)
PROJECT NAMEp
Replacement Unmarked Police Vehicles Number:
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list )
thousands of dollars(in the total project cost,the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Outside Funds
Year Cost Funds Amount Source Amount _ Source Amount Source
2005 — `06 $170 $170 $
2006— `07 $90 $90 $
2007— `08 $111 $111 _ $
2008- `09 $121 $121 $
2009- '10 $190 $190 $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars)the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The"Total Cost" for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
Year Cost Personnel Other _ Amount Source _ Amount Source
2005 — `06 $-15 $0 Repl $15 Heavy $
Maint.
2006— `07 $-8 $0 Repl $8 Heavy $
Maint.
2007— '08 $-8.5 $0 Repl $8.5 Heavy $
Maint.
2008- '09 $-9 $0 Repl $9 Heavy $
Maint.
2009- '10 $-14 $0 Repl $14 Heavy
Maint.
EVALUATION(for TAC use only)
Assumption Project: Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety, Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005—2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
PROJECT NAVIE. 15 Passenger van Number: I
Department: Community Development/Parks and Recreation Department Priority: 17
1. Project Description: 15 Passenger Van for recreational use programs
Is this a rolloverJ ro'ect?jq L
ist any FY that it was previously funded in:
P 2. Project Location (if applicable):
N/A.
3. How does this project improve public and/or employee health, safety, and welfare?
A van will allow Recreation Programs to be expanded to include regular"50+"trips,transportation
for recreational activities,tours,Division projects, and the DARE Rec N Roll Program. Recreation
isP ositive for all age groups,and in particular,has been proven to reduce the risk of youth
participating in negative activities such as drugs and crime.
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
A Town owned van will hel• meet the •oal of •rovi din• •ro• ams for all a•es b •rovidin
transportation to and from events and programs; to trainings, meetings and tours for staff, board,
committee members, and aide in traffic reduction. In Focus 2020, section 4.6 "Parks, Open Space,
and Recreation Element" Goal 6.3 says "To provide a broad range of recreational activities to serve
the needs of all a s e • ou•s and interests." Polic 6.3A: "Provide esuitable o.•ortunities for all
residents to pursue recreational activities."
5. How does this project impact the Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. Cost- $25,000 plus O&M.
B. If not funded, the Town would continue to loose revenue from .ro• ams which re.uire on'oin•
use of a Town van.
6. What is the desired service level: To offer new programs and services for all ages utilizing a van.
How does this project have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. If funded,this project will provide for new programs and services for patrons of all ages.
B.No change.
7. How does this project impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town? O&M costs will
increase to cover gasoline, oil, and general maintenance.
8. Does this project answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?No.
9. Is thisJ ro'ect coordinated with other project(s)to create significant savings of time, money, and
P
convenience? Describe. (Report projected cost savings on the reverse side.) No.
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$,000)
PROJECT NAME:. Recreation Van Number: l
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list(in thousands of dollars)the total project cost,the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside fundingsources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previousyears,ears and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
IFiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Carry Banked
ear Cost Funds Amount Source Amount Source Forward Funds
2005 — `06$25,000 $25,000 $ $ $ $
2006 $ $ $ $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
Please list(in thousands of dollars)the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements,rovements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The "Total Cost"for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
ear Cost Personnel Other Amount_ Source Amount Source
2005 —'06 $2 $ $2 $ _ $
2006— `07 $2 $ ,$2 $ $
2007_ $3 $ $
08 $3 $
2008—`09 $3 $ $3 $ $
2009— $3 10` $ $3 $ $
Arizona Department of Administration State Procurement office
EVALUATION(for TAC use only)
Assumption Project: Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety,Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels .
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005—2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
PROJECT NAME: Portable Pool Aerators Number:
Department: eve
CommunityDevelopment/Parks ment/Parks & Recreation Division Department Priority: 14
p
1. Project ect Descrip tion: The aerators reduce amount of pool chemicals needed and high temperatures
can be controlled.
Is this a rolloverJroj ect? No. List any FY that it was previously funded in:
p
Project Location(if a licable): Oro Valley Municipal Pool,23 West Calle Concordia.
2. J Pp
3. How does this project improve public
ct and/or employee health, safety, and welfare?
Aeration,' which is the natural re-circulation process, will replenish existing pool water supplies with
needed fresh oxygen, eliminating bacteria, algae, and the growing threat of transmittable viruses,
ygllduringuncomfortably especially the hot summer months when the pool water can get into the uncomf y warm
p y
90's.
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
POST P
Goal 4Policy4A: "Expeditiously remedy the existing deficiencies in the Towns community
park system."
5. How does thisJ roj ect impact the Town's fiscal resources,A.)if funded B.) if not funded?
p P
A. p
Expense—Cost= $13,00; Revenue—unchanged; O&M—decreased use of chemicals, increased
due to operational expenses—creates a"wash" or unchanged expense.
B.None.
6.
What is the desired service level: To use the natural process of aeration to decrease the amount of
chemicals needed to eliminate bacteria,algae and transmittable virusus in the pool; decrease the
temperature of the pool during the summer months.
How does thisJ ro'ect have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
p
A. Provide safe and comfortable swimmin• •ool tern•eratures in the hot summer months of service.
B. p
Pool temperatures will continue to be very hot, unsafe and uncomfortable especially to
competitive swimmers in the hot summer months.
7. How does thisp roj ect impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
It will only have a slight impact on power usage.
8. Does thisJroj ect answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
p
It may: for instance, if someone overheated while swimming it could be life threatening.
project Is Jro
this j ect coordinated with other project(s) to create significant savings of time,money, and
convenience? Describe. (Report projected cost savings on the reverse side.)
No.
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$, 000)
PROJECT NAME: Portable Pool Aerators Number:
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list(in thousands of dollars)the total project cost,the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Carry Banked
Year Cost Funds Amount Source Amount _ Source Forward Funds
2005 — '06513 $13 $ $ .$ $
2006— `07$ $ ,$ $ _$ $
2007— '08,$ $ $ _$ $ $
2008— `09$ $ $ .$ $ $
2009— '10$ $ $ _ $ $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
Please list(in thousands of dollars)the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases,and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The"Total Cost" for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
IFiscal
Total Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
Cost Personnel Other _Amount_ Source Amount Source
,
2005 —`06 $1 $ $1 $ _ $
2006— '07 $2 $ $2 .$ ,$
2007— '08 $2.5 $ $2.5 $ $
2008— '09 $2.5 $ $2.5 $ $
2009— `10 $2.5 $ $2.5 $ $
EVALUATION(for TAC use only)
Assumption Project:Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety, Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005—2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
PROJECT NAME: CDO Linear Park Trail Improvemenis Project Number:
Department: Development/Parks CommunityDevelo ment/Parks and Recreation Department Priority: _19
This project would provide for Phase II of the Canada del Oro Linear Park,
1. Project Description:
extending the
current park (under development) .525 miles to the east of First Avenue. A 12 foot
wide, shared usepath would also incorporate amenities such as a covered ramada,bike racks,
signageand an informational kiosk. A bridge would be constructed over one of the side washes
,
located within this project's scope.
Is this a rolloverJro'ect? no List any FY that it was previously funded in:
p
Project Location(if applicable):
The project would extend .525 miles along the soil cement floodwall on the south side of the
Canada del Oro Wash, beginning at First Avenue.
2. How does thisJ ro'ect improve public and/or employee health, safety, and welfare?
p p
pathsprovide recreational outlets to bikers,hikers, roller bladers, or those with strollers
Shareduse .
enhancepersonal fitness. The path will provide access to businesses along First Avenue and
to
Oracle Road; enhance user safety by giving them an alternative route that does not place them in
vehicular traffic; and allow users to access the historic Steam Pump Ranch.
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
trail is referenced in the Town's General Plan in 1996 and the Parks, Open Space and Trail
This
(POST)
Master Plan in 1994 and 1999, as well as the Eastern Pima County Master Trail Plan. When
completed,the CDO Linear Park will be a critical alternate mode system link in the Pima County
River Parks Master Plan, a system that will provide more than 100 miles of vehicle-free recreation
areas within the Pima County metropolitan region.
5. How does thismJ ro'ect impact the Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
p p
A. Cost= $203,673. Increased 0 &M to maintain the path.
B.None.
6. What is the desired service level: To provide a safe,well maintained multi-use path which builds on
the existing trails plan adopted by the Town.
How does thisJroject have an effect on Town's service levels, A.)if funded B.) if not funded?
P
A. The trail will be an extension of the trail to be completed to the south along the CDO wash.
Bathe trail to the south will stop abruptly at 1st Avenue.
7. How does this projectimpactOperation O and Maintenance costs for the Town?
CCurrently, it isplanned that the CDO Linear Park and its amenities will be maintained by Parks and
urr y, . . - .
Recreation Division staff. The addition of this Park will require an increase in personnel and O&M
costs.
8. Does thisJro'ect answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
p
n/a
project Is tro
this 'ect coordinated with other project(s)to create significant savings of time, money, and
convenience? Describe. (Report projected cost savings on the reverse side.) n/a
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands-4, 000)
PROJECT NAME:
CDO Linear Park Trail Improvements Project Number: I
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list(in thousands of dollars)the total project cost,the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Carry Banked
Year Cost Funds Amount Source Amount Source Forward Funds
2005 — '0650 $ $ $ $ $
2006— `07$106,541 $67,891 $38,651 Grant $ $ $
2007— `08$106,541 $67,891 $38,651 Grant $ _ $ $
2008— `09$106541 $67,891 $38,651 Grant $ $ $
2009— `10$ $ $ $ $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars)the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The "Total Cost"for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
ear Cost Personnel Other Amount Source Amount Source
2005 — `06 $ $ $ $ ,$
2006— `07 $ $ $ $ $
2007— `08 $ $ $ $ $
2008— `09 $ $ $ ,$ _ $
2009— '10 $24,000 $14,000 $10,000 $ $
EVALUATION(for TAC use only)
Assumption Project:Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety,Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005—2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
PROJECT NAME: Basketball and Tennis Courts Resurfacing Number:
Department: .
Community Development—Parks & Recreation Division Department Priority: 7
1. Description:
Project Descri Resurfacing the basketball court and the tennis court at Riverfront Park; a
standard maintenance practice to eliminate cracking and chipping.
Is this a rolloverJ
ro•ect? No List any FY that it was previously funded in:
P
2. Project Location(if applicable):
Canada del Oro Riverfront Park, 551 West Lambert Lane, Oro Valley, Arizona 85737
3. How does thisP roj ect improve public and/or employee health, safety, and welfare?
ThisJro•ect will create a smooth playing surface which will aid in the prevention of tripping
P
hazards.
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
POST Goal 4 Polic 4A: "Ex•editiousl remed the existin• deficiencies in the Towns communi
park system."
5. How does thisJro•ect impact the Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
p
A. Project cost= $12,000; Operation and maintenance costs will remain the same.
B. If the court is allowed to deteriorate without maintenance,the cost of resurfacing will
significantly increase over time.
6. What is the desired service level: Jo provide a safe and properly maintained tennis court and basket
ball court for patron use and enjoyment.
How does thisJ
ro'ect have an effect on Town's service levels,A.)if funded B.) if not funded?
P
A. Project will insure that the tennis court and basketball court is safe for public use.
B. Continued deterioration of the old surface, which will generate safety concerns.
7. How does this project impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
Qperation and Maintenance will remain stable if the .r&ect is corn•leted• if not corn•leted the costs
will increase over time.
8. Does thisP roject answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
If the resurfacing is not completed, safety concerns will develop due to the deterioration of the old
the playing surface.
9. Is thisJro'ect coordinated with other project(s)to create significant savings of time,money, and
P
convenience? Describe. (Report projected cost savings on the reverse side.)
No.
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$,000)
PROJECT NAME: Basketball and Tennis Courts Resurfacing Number:
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list(in thousands of dollars)the total project cost,the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Carry Banked
ear Cost Funds Amount Source Amount Source Forward Funds
2005— `06$12 $12 ,$ .$ .$ $
2006— '07,$ $ $ $ _ $ $
2007—`08$ $ $ $ _ .$ $
2008— `09$ $ $ .$ ,$ $
2009— '10$ $ $ $ $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
Please list(in thousands of dollars)the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The"Total Cost" for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
Year Cost Personnel Other Amount Source Amount Source
2005—`06 $0 $ $ $ $
2006—`07 $0 $ $ _$ $
2007—`08 $0 $ ,$ $ $
2008— '09 $0 $ $ $ $
2009— '10 $0 $ $ $ $
EVALUATION(for TAC use only)
Assumption Project:Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety,Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels _
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005—2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
PROJECT NAME: Dog Park Projects Number: I
Department:
Parks and Recreation—Community Development Department Priority: 11
'ption: Part 1: Upgrade existing dog park at James D. Kriegh Park with irrigation,
1. Project Descn
lighting, site furnl ,
'ture and areas of grass. Cost= $16,000 Part 2: Design and build a new dog park
CDO Riverfront
Park, includingfencing, lighting, irrigation, site furniture, dog water fountain,
at
and grass. Cost= $30,000 (3rd year requested)
this a rollover project? No. List any FY that it was previously funded in:
Is p J _
2. Project Location (if applicable): James D. Kriegh Park, 23 West Calle Concordia; OroValley, AZ
857373 and CDO Riverfront Park, 551 West Lambert Lane, Oro Valley, AZ 85737
does this project improve public and/or employee health, safety, and welfare? Upgrades to
3. How p
D. Kriegh DogPark will cut down on dust, provide a cooler surface, and make the site more
James g
comfortable and convenient overall. The Riverfront Park dog park will provide a play area for dogs
in ap ark which currently has no facilities available.
community How does this project support stated goals? POST Goal 4, Policy 4A: "Expeditiously
remedy the existingdeficiencies in the Towns community park system."
How does this project impact the Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
5. p
A. If funded, project this 'ect will cost $46,000: $16,000 for James D. Kriegh Park and $30,000 for
Riverfront Park. The O&M costs will increase b a.•roximatel $6 000 .er ear.
this project is postponed for one year,there may be a $1,000 increase in the cost the following
B. If p p
year.
6. What is the desired service level: To respond to the overwhelming requests from patrons for safe,
well developed dogpark facility at both of the existing active parks in Oro Valley.
p
pt
does this project have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
How
A. Upgrades to James D. Kriegh Dog Park will provide a more hospitable environment for the dogs
and their owners, providinga cooler surface and making the site more comfortable and convenient
overall.
The Riverfront Park dog park will provide a play area for dogs in a park which currently has
no facilities available.
B. If
not funded the unim.roved do. •ark at James D. Krie.11 Park will continue to be used. There
will bdog
no park at Riverfront Park, and there will continue to be user conflicts on the ball fields
as do• owners seek to create s maces in ma..ro.riate areas to exercise their animals.
7. How does thisJro'ect impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
p
There
will be an increase in the O&M due to the addition of irrigation and grass at one facility, and
the addition of all of the amenities at the other facility.
8. Does thisJro'ect answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
p
Yes
fres uentl the Town receives corn.laints re ardin. loose do.s in the 'arks si I htin. instances
where patrons have been frightened, chased or jumped on by someone's dog. Providing a legitimate
location for off-leash dog recreation could prevent a dog bite and dog related safety concerns.
9. Is this project coordinated with other project(s) to create significant savings of time, money, and
convenience? Describe. (Report projected cost savings on the reverse side.) No.
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$,000)
PROJECT NAME: Dog Park Projects Number:
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list(in thousands of dollars)the total project cost,the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Carry Banked
Year Cost Funds Amount Source Amount Source Forward Funds
2005 —`06$46 $46 $ $ $ $
($l4JDK
$30 RFP)
2006— `07$ .$ $ $ $ $
2007—`08$ $ $ $ $ $
2008—`09$ $ $ $ $ $
_
2009—'10$ $ $ $ - $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
Please list(in thousands of dollars)the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.)in the Savings columns. The"Total Cost" for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
(Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
fear Cost Personnel_ Other Amount Source Amount Source
2005— `06 $2 $1 $1 $ $
2006— `07 $6 $3 $3 ,$ $
2007— `08 $6 $3 $3 $ $
2008— `09 $6 $3 $3 $ $
2009— `10 $7 $4 $3 $ $
EVALUATION(for TAC use only)
Assumption Project: Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety,Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005—2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
—Utility NAME: John Deere Gators Vehicles Number:
Department: Community Development—Parks & Recreation Division Department Priority: 13
1. p
Project Description: Increase fleet of utility vehicles for both Canada del Oro Riverfront Park and
James D. Kriegh Park.
Is this a rollover project? No List any FY that it was previously funded in:
2. Project Location(if applicable):
Canada del Oro Riverfront Park 551 West Lambert Lane, Oro Valley., Arizona 85737 and
James D. Kriegh Park, 23 West Calle Concordia, Oro Valley,Arizona 85737
3. How does this project improve public and/or employee health, safety, and welfare?
Will augment the fleet of vehicles used for maintenance in both parks and aid in the management
and facilitation of special events and festivals.
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
POST Goal 4, Policy 4A: "Expeditiously remedy the existing deficiencies in the Towns community
park system."
5. How does thisp roject impact the Town's fiscal resources,A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A.No impact on revenue; cost of vehicles (3) would be $36,000; maintenance cost would be $1,000
per year.
B.None.
6. What is the desired service level: To provide a fleet of Parks maintenance vehicles sufficient in size
to allow for an efficient work flow and to allow for more comprehensive management of special
events and festivals.
How does this project have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. Would allow staff to be more efficient. Also would allow staff to help the artisans, Police, etc. at
special events.
B. Continue to operate Parks Maintenance at a lower efficiency level; continue to operate special
events without the vehicles needed.
7. How does this project impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
The operation and maintenance cost would increase for fuel and general maintenance of the vehicles.
8. Does this project answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
No.
9. Is this project coordinated with other project(s)to create significant savings of time, money, and
convenience? Describe. (Report projected cost savings on the reverse side.)
No.
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$,000)
PROJECT NAME: John Deere Gators—Utility Vehicles Number:
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list(in thousands of dollars)the total project cost,the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Carry Banked
Year Cost Funds Amount Source Amount _ Source Forward Funds
2005— `06$36 $36 $ $_ .$ $
2006— `07$ $ $ .$ $ $
2007— `08$ $ $ $ .$ $
2008— `09$ $ $ $ $ ,$
2009— '10$ $ $ $ _ $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
Please list(in thousands of dollars)the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The"Total Cost"for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
Year Cost Personnel Other Amount Source Amount Source
2005 — `06 $1 _$ ,$1 $ $
2006— `07 $1 ,$ $1 - $ $
2007—`08 $1 $ $1 .$ $
2008—`09 $1 $ $1 $$
2009—'10 $1 $ $1 $ $
EVALUATION(for TAC use only)
Assumption Project:Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety,Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005—2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
PROJECT NAME: p�
Irrigation Upgrades - JDK Park Number:
g
Department: Parks and Recreation—Community Development Department Priority: 6
1. Project Description: New irrigation system at JDK Park to increase efficiency, conserve water and
maintain healthier turf. Project will integrate Riverfront Park and JDK Park into the same
computerized irrigation system, standardizing operations and increasing efficiencies. Will
substantially decrease staff time and money spent on repairs. Will significantly decrease the number
of incidents of closed fields due to irrigation breaks. (4t year requested)
Is this a rollover project? No. List any FY that it was previously funded in:
2. Project Location (if applicable): James D. Kriegh Park; 23 W Calle Concordia, OV, AZ 85737
3. How does this project improve public and/or employee health, safety, and welfare? A more efficient
ystem would improve the health of the turf, which in turn would make the park more inviting to the
public. A lush turf would decrease injuries due to falls and slips on thin or non-existing turf. The
project would also detect and pinpoint leaks, breaks and other problems to stop excessive water use.
4. How does thisp roject support stated community goals? POST Goal 4, Policy 4A: "Expeditiously
remedy the existing deficiencies in the Towns community park system." Also, Focus 2020 General
Plan section 4.5.4, Policy 5.1J "Ensure that present land use...does not adversely impact existing
wells or aquifers."
5. How does this project impact the Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. Cost of •ro'ect will be $145 000. Maintenance and re•air cost will decrease at least $5 000 •er
year. Cost of water bills will decrease due to decrease in water usage.
B. There will be continued and increasing expenses for water waste, breaks and repairs. May pay
penalties imposed by State of Arizona Department of Water Resources for excessive use of water.
There will be loss of revenue because the fields will have to be closed for repairs as required.
6. What is the desired service level: To provide a new computerized, fully functioning irrigation system
that will reflect the Town's commitment to water conservation.
How does this project have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. Leagues would experience a decrease in field"down times" due to water breaks. The system will
be monitored continually to detect breaks, leaks and other problems, conserving water and money,
B. Breaks and leaks in the old system will increase over time and will cause more field closures; turf
health will continue to deteriate with d s•ots and mudd s•ots• •roblems will •o on undetected
until visual signs of problems appear; and water bills will increase.
7. How does this project impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
O&M costs will decrease by at least $5,000 per year due to fewer repairs.
8. Does this project answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
Yes. JDK Park needs to be in compliance with mandates from the AZ Dept of Water Resources or
be fined. The park was out of compliance in 2002 as a result of the deteriorating system.
9. Is this project coordinated with other project(s) to create significant savings of time, money, and
convenience? Describe. (Report projected cost savings on the reverse side.)
This project will establish compatibility between the system at JDK Park and the system at
Riverfront Park, allowing for standardization of operations,maintenance, and training.
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$, 000)
• - K Park Number:
PROJECT NAME: Irrigation Upgrades JD
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars)the total project cost,the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside fundingsources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Carry Banked
ear Cost Funds Amount Source _ Amount Source Forward _ Funds
2005 — `06$145 $145 $ $ $ $
2006— `07$ $ $ _$ $ $
2007— '08.$ $ $ ,$ ,$ $
2008— `09$ $ $ $ $ $
2009— `10$ $ $ ,$ $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars)the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements,rovements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The"Total Cost" for each year
p
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal
Total Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
Year Cost Personnel, Other Amount Source _Amount_ Source
2005— '06 $-6 $ $ $5 Emergency $1 • Water
Repairs
2006— '07 $-7 $ $ �$5 $2 ,,
2007— '08 $-9 $ $ $6 $3 "
2008— '09 $-9 $ _$ $6 ,, $3 44
2009— '10 $-9 $ $ $6 44 $3 ,,
EVALUATION(for TAC use only)
Assumption Project:Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety, Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005—2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
PROJECT NAME: Naranja Town Site Programming and Schematic Design Q Number:
Department: Parks and Recreation—Community Development Department Priority: 16
Implement the programming process for the Naranja Town Site, including
1. Project Description: p
market analyp
usage,
sis facilispace allocation, equipment needs, schematic design,phasing
tY
options, and a cost model for all proposed buildings
this a rollover project? No List any FY that it was previously funded in:
Is p J �-
2. Project Location(if applicable):
Naranja Town Site, Oro Valley,AZ 85737
3. How does thisJ roj ect improve public and/or employee health, safety, and welfare?
p p
Necessary stepin the implementation of the Naranja Town Site Master Plan as unanimously
N ary P
accepted by the Town Council on November 20, 2002.
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
POST
Goal 4 Polic 4A: "Ex•editiousl remed the existin• deficiencies in the Towns communi
park system."
5. How does this projectm
impact the Town's fiscal resources,A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
p
A. Cost=235,000.
B. Cost may increase over time due to inflation.
is the desired service level:_To begin the process of developing a Community Park which will
6. What
provide Parks, Recreational, and Cultural amenities for all ages and a wide range of interest areas.
How does this project have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A.Necess. ste. in the im•lementation of the Naran a Town Site Master Plan as unanimousl
accepted by the Town Council on November 20, 2002.
B. Will delay in the implementation of the Naranja Town Site Master Plan.
7. How does thisJro'ect impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
p
N/A
8. Does thisJro'ect answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
p
No.
this project coordinated with other project(s) to create significant savings of time, money, and
9. Is p �
convenience? Describe. (Report projected cost savings on the reverse side.)
No.
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$, 000)
PROJECT
NAME: Naranja Town Site Programming and Schematic Design Number: I
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list(in thousands of dollars)the total project cost,the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Carry Banked
Year Cost Funds Amount Source Amount Source Forward Funds
2005 —`06$235 $235 $ $ $ $
2006— `07$ $ $ _ $ .$ $
2007— `08$ $ $ $ $ $
2008— `09$ $ $ $ $ $
2009— `10$ $ $ $ $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
Please list(in thousands of dollars)the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The "Total Cost"for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
Year Cost Personnel Other Amount Source Amount Source
2005 — `06 $ $ $ $ $
2006— `07 $ $ $ $ $
2007— `08 $ $ _$ $ r$
2008 —`09 $ $ $ $ $
2009— '10 $ $ $ $ $
EVALUATION(for TAC use only)
Assumption Project:Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety,Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$, 000)
PROJECT NAME: Parks Entrance Signage (2) Number:
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list(in thousands of dollars)the total project cost,the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Carry Banked
Year Cost Funds Amount Source Amount Source , Forward Funds
2005— `06$21 ,$21 $ $ $ $
2006— `07$ $ $ $ -$ $
2007— '08:$ .$ _$ _ $ _ ,$ $
2008— `09$ $ $ $ :$ $
2009— 'l0$ $ $ $ $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
Please list(in thousands of dollars)the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The"Total Cost"for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings _ Projected Savings
Year Cost Personnel Other Amount Source Amount Source
2005— `06 $0 $ $ $ $
2006— `07 $0 $ ,$ .$ .$
2007— `08 $1 $ $1 $ .$
2008— `09 $0 $ $ $ $
2009—'10 $1 $ $1 $ $
EVALUATION(for TAC use only)
Assumption Project:Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety,Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005—2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
PROJECT NAME: Paving—NE Parking Lot @ James D. Kriegh Park Number:
Department:
.Parks and Recreation—Community Development Department Priority: 5
Construct andpave a newparking lot in the northeast corner of James D. Kriegh
1. Project Description:kern end of E leston Drive. Lot to include 60 standard and 3 handicap spaces. (5th
Park at the sout g
year requested)
this a rollover project?jç List any FY that it was previously funded in:
Is p � —
2. Project Location(if applicable):
James D. Kriegh Park; 23 W. Called Concordia; Oro Valley, AZ 85737. Northeast corner of park.
How does this project improve public and/or employee health, safety, and welfare?
3. p � p
Will provide safecompliantparking and ADA and access to buildings, fields and facilities on the
north side of thep ark. Will eliminate serious dust problem created by vehicles.
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
POST Goal 4, Policy4A: "Expeditiously remedy the existing deficiencies in the Towns community
pY
park system."
5. How does this
• projectimpact the Town's fiscal resources,A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
p
Ap
. No impact on revenue; cost of installation $80,000; maintenance cost will stay the same as some
lot
will be eliminated (grading, dust control) and some costs will be added (blowing off ,
costs
parking lot maintenance).
B. If not funded, maintenance cost will continue @ approximately $2000 per year.
6. What is the desired service level: Safe, paved, ADA compliant parking and access to buildings,
fields and facilities on the north side of James D. Kriegh Park.
project Howro
does this 'echave an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
' ' ' the
A. Provides safe, paved, ADA compliant parking and access to buildings, fields and facilities on
A
north side of the park.
B.
If not funded, the area will remain a serious dust problems inconvenient for users, ADA non-
compliant and a continuing maintenance problem.
7. How does thisp roj ect impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
The 0 negligible,&M cost will be ne li ible, as some costs will be eliminated and some costs will be added.
8. Does thisPJ
ro•ect answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
Yes, current lot is not compliant with Town standards or ADA requirements.
o'ect coordinated with other project(s) to create significant savings of time, money, and
9. Is this project p
convenience? Describe. (Report projected cost savings on the reverse side.)
This project could be combined with the repaving project proposed for the south parking lot in the
same park.
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$,000)
PROJECT NAME: Paving—NE Parking Lot @ James D. Kriegh Park .Number:
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list(in thousands of dollars)the total project cost,the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Carry Banked
Year Cost Funds Amount _ Source _ Amount Source Forward Funds
2005 —`06$80 $80 $ $ $ $
2006—`07$ $ ,$ _. _$ - $ $
2007— `08$ $ $ $ _ $ $
2008— '09,$ $ $ $ $ $
2009—'10$ $ $ $ - $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
Please list(in thousands of dollars)the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The"Total Cost"for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
TFiscal Total Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
ear _ Cost Personnel Other Amount Source Amount Source
2005 —`06 $ $ $ .$ $
2006— '07 $ $ $ $ .$
2007— `08 $ $ $ .$ $
2008— `09 $ $ $ $ $
2009— '10 $ $ $ $ _ $
EVALUATION(for TAC use only)
Assumption Project:Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety,Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005—2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
PROJECT NAME: James D. Kriegh—Upgrade Existing Parking Lot Number:
De artment:_Parks and Recreation—Community Development Department Priority: 4
p
1. P
Project Description: Overhaul the existing parking lot in the southwest corner of the park.(Removed
from 04-05 Budget—requested again)
Is this a rolloverJroj ect? No. List any FY that it was previously funded in:
P
2. Project Location(if applicable):
James D. Kriegh Park; 23 W. Calle Concordia; Oro Valley, 85737
3. How does thisp roject improve public and/or employee health, safety, and welfare?
Reworking the existing lot will provide a safes smooth, clearly striped parking area for park users.
Portions of the lot have excessive cross slopes and do not comply with ADA standards. Portions of
the lot are poorly drained and retain water.
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
POST Goal 4, Policy 4A: "Expeditiously remedy the existing deficiencies in the Town's community
park system."
project impact How mro
does this ject ithe Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A.No impact on revenue;cost of renovation will be $62000; maintenance costs will decrease by
approximately$1,000 per year.
B. Maintenance costs will continue and increase over time. A delay of one year could increase cost
by $2,000.
6. What is the desired service level: _Safe, paved, ADA compliant parking and access to buildings,
fields and facilities on the south side of James D. Kriegh Park.
How does thisp roject have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. Reworking the existing lot will provide a safe, smooths clearly striped parking area for park users.
B. Patrons will continue to utilize a parking lot which is uneven areas and often holds water due to
poor drainage.
7. How does this project impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
The O&M costs will be decreased by approximately $1,000 per year.
project
Does this answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
Yes, all parking areas need to be in compliance with ADA.
9. Is thisJ roject coordinated with other project(s)to create significant savings of time, money, and
p
convenience? Describe. (Report projected cost savings on the reverse side.)
could be combined with the pavingproject proposed for the NE parking lot in the same
This project
park.
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$, 000)
PROJECT NAME: JamesKriegh D. Krie h—Upgrade Existing Parking Lot Q Number:
CAPITAL COSTS
thousands of dollars)the total project cost, the capital funds requested from the Town, all
Please list(in
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds _ Carry Banked
Year Cost Funds Amount Source Amount _ Source Forward - Funds
2005— `06,$62 $62 _$ ,$ $ $
2006— `07$ $ $ $ $ $
2007— '08,$ $ $ $ .$ $
2008— `09$ $ $ _ $ $ $
2009— '10$ $ $ $ $ $ •
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
Please list(in thousands of dollars)the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The "Total Cost" for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
ear Cost Personnel Other Amount Source Amount Source
2005 — '06 $-1 $ $ $.5 _Staff $.5 Materials
2006— `07 $-1 $ $ $.5 " $.5 "
2007— '08 $-1 $ $ $.5 4C $.5 "
2008— `09 $-1 $ $1 $1 $1 "
2009— `10 $-1 $ $1 $1 CC $1 "
EVALUATION(for TAC use only)
Assumption Project: Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety, Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals _ Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005—2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
PROJECT NAME: Pick-Up Truck Number:
Department: Parks and Recreation—Community Development Department Priority: 3
1. Project Description: Pick-up truck for the Parks Facilities/Maintenance Supervisor. Currently no
Project
vehicle assigned to this position. (5th year requested)
Is this a rollover project? NoList any FY that it was previously funded in:
2. Project Location(if applicable): N/A
3. How does this project improve public and/or employee health, safety, and welfare?
This will allow the public to immediately identify the Parks employee and insure that the necessary
tools are available on the truck while working. This vehicle will assist in the general provision of
parks and recreation services.
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
This
J ro•ect supports accomplishment of the Parks, Open Space, and Recreation element of the
p
General Plan(Page 4.6.9, goal 6.3.)
5. How does this project impact the Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. No impact on revenue; cost to purchase $28,000; will increase O&M cost for vehicle
maintenance.
B. The Supervisor will be paid mileage for the number of miles driven in a personal vehicle utilized for Town business. At an avera•e of 10 miles a da that will e•nate to about $900 •er ear.
6. What is the desired service level: To provide the Parks staff with a Town vehicle to utilize while
completing requisite tasks. This will allow the public to immediately identify the Parks employee
and insure that the necessary tools are available on the truck while working_
How does thisp roject have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. This vehicle will allow the Su•ervisor to o.erate out of a Town identified vehicle e.ui••ed with
the appp ro riate tools. Additionally, the vehicle may be used, if necessary, for field work or to haul
materials.
B. The Su.ervisor will not be identifiable as a Town em•to ee and will not have the •ro•er tools
when driving a personal vehicle. Additionally, the Division will continue to be down a vehicle for
field work and hauling materials.
7. How does this project impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
This project will increase O&M costs for vehicle maintenance.
8. Does this project answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
No.
this project coordinated with other project(s) to create significant savings of time, money, and
9. Is p �
convenience? Describe. (Report projected cost savings on the reverse side.)
No.
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005—2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
PROJECT NAME: 110 Compact
4-WD Tractor Loader and Backhoe Number:
Department: Community Development—Parks & Recreation Division Department Priority: 8
1. Project Description: Purchase of a large, powerful tractor to handle major work loads.
Is this a rollover project? No List any FY that it was previously funded in:
2. Project Location (if applicable):
Canada del Oro Riverfront Park 551 West Lambert Lane, Oro Valley, Arizona 85737 and
James D. Kriegh Park, 23 West Calle Concordia, Oro Valley,Arizona 85737
3. How does this project improve public and/or employee health, safety, and welfare?
Decrease risk of employee injury, as this tractor will greatly reduce the physical labor involved in
major projects; speed up the completion of major projects.
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
ThisJro'ect supports accomplishment of the Parks, Open Space, and Recreation element of the
p
General Plan(Page 4.6.9,goal 6.3.).
5. How does this project impact the Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A.No impact on revenue; eliminate the need to rent similar equipment: costs of tractor would be
$48,000; operation and maintenance cost would increase.
B. Rental costs to the Town will continue and increase as projects develop.
6. What is the desired service level: To outfit the Parks Section with a tractor capable of handling
existing projects in order to facilitate the timely accomplishment of projects and decrease the
likelihood of employee injury.
How does this project have an effect on Town's service levels,A.)if funded B.) if not funded?
A. Will provide faster service by completing projects quicker.
B. Projects will continue to move slowly and park laborers will continue to be exposed to a greater
risk of injury than necessary because they will not have the proper tractor to complete the work.
7. How does this project impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
Would increase operation and maintenance to due yearly maintenance to service the tractor as
recommended by the manufacturer.
8. Does this project answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
No.
9. Is thisp roj ect coordinated with other project(s)to create significant savings of time, money, and
convenience? Describe. (Report projected cost savings on the reverse side.)
Yes. This piece of equipment would directly impact the efficiency of the Parks Section. Each large
field project would be completed faster, thereby taking less staff time to complete.
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$, 000)
PROJECT NASp
110 Compact 4-WD Tractor Loader and Backhoe Number:
CAPITAL COSTS
of dollars)the total project cost,the capital funds requested from the Town, all
Please list(in thousands
probable outside
fundingsources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Outside Funds Outside Funds
Fiscal Total Town Carry Banked
Cost Funds Amount Source _ Amount Source Forward Funds
Year _
` $48 $ _ $ $
2005 06$48
2006 07$
$ $ $ $ .$
2007 '08_$
$ $ $ $ $
2008— 09$ $ $ $ $ $,
2009— 10$ $ $ $ $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
Please list(in thousands of dollars)the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel,leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
p
(efficiency
improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The "Total Cost"for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
• Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
Fiscal Total Projected
Year
Cost Personnel Other Amount Source Amount Source
_
2005 — `06 $0 $ $1 $1 Staff Time $ _ ,
2006— `07 $-i $ $2 $3 " .$ ,
2007— `08 $-1 $ $2 _$3 _ cc $
2008 —`09 $-1 $
_$2 $3 t" $
2009— `10 $-1 $ $3 $4 cc $
EVALUATION(for TAC use only)
Assumption Project: Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety, Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005—2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
'
PROJECT NAME: Trail Expansion for West Lambert Lane Park Number:
Department: Parks and Recreation—Community Development Department Priority: 18,
1. Project Description: Construction of approximately a half mile of additional trails at West Lambert
Lane Park.
Is this a rolloverJ ro'ect?j%jç . List any FY that it was previously funded in:
p --
2 Project Location(if applicable):
West Lambert Lane Park, West Lambert Lane, Oro Valley, Arizona, 85737
3. How does thisJro'ect improve public and/or employee health, safety, and welfare?
p
providespP additional opportunities to hike safely through the West Lambert Lane property. Provides
access to the park from the north.
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
POST Plan: Goal 4, Policy 4-A"Expeditiously remedy the existing deficiencies in the Town's
community park system."
5. How does thismJ roject impact the Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
p p
A. If funded, thisJ
roject will cost $25,000 to construct. Increased maintenance cost would be
p
approximately $1,000 per year.
B. If not funded, this project is anticipated to increase in cost by $750 per year for every year not
funded.
6. What is the desired service level: jo provide a safe and enjoyable system of trails at the West
Lambert Lane Park.
How does thisJroject have an effect on Town's service levels,A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
p
A. Provides additional trail opportunities for park users, adding to the existing mile of trails and
completing the trails plan for this property. Provides access for subdivision to the north of the park.
p g
B. Park users will have to use the existing mile of trails provided.
7. How does thisp roject impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
Increases park maintenance costs about$1,000 per year.
8. Does thisp roject answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
No.
9. Is thisJro'ect coordinated with other project(s)to create significant savings of time, money, and
p
convenience? Describe. (Report projected cost savings on the reverse side.)
No.
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$, 000)
PROJECT NAME: Trail Expansion for West Lambert Lane Park Number:
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list(in thousands of dollars)the total project cost,the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Carry Banked
Year Cost Funds AmountSource Amount _ Source Forward , Funds
2005 — `06$25 $25 $ $ $ $
2006—`07$ $ $ $ $ $
2007— '08,$ $ $ ,$ $ $
2008— `09$ $ $ ,$ $ $
2009— '10$ $ $ $ $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
Please list(in thousands of dollars)the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The"Total Cost"for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
[Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
fear Cost Personnel_ Other Amount Source Amount Source
2005— `06 $ $ $ $ _ $
2006—'07 $1 $1 $ ,$ .$
2007— `08 $1 $1 $ ,$ �
2008— `09 $1 $1 $ $ $
2009— `10 $1 $1 $ $ _ $
EVALUATION(for TAC use only)
Assumption Project: Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety,Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005— '06 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
PROJECT NAME: Remodel Basement (Add Offices, Bathrooms & Storage) Number: I
Department: Community Development Department—Building Safety Department Priority: (1) High
1. Project Description: Due to the significant rise in construction material and labor costs since the
original CIP for the Basement Remodel was approved, we ask that an additional $20,000.00 be
allocated in order to complete the project as intended and designed. Approximately 2000 square foot
remodel of the basement area of the Administration Building; adding offices and storage space, and
turning_the shower/lavatory area into bathrooms compliant with Federal and State Handicap
Accessibility requirements was approved for fiscal year 2003-04 and continued in 2004-05. This
project is necessary to accommodate the seven current employees as well as office area for future
plan review and inspection staff. Storage space for archived plans is also badly needed. The
on anally projected construction cost for this work was approximately $50 dollars per square foot
for a total cost of$100,000.00. The architectural plans are typically about 15%of the construction
cost, or approximately $15,000.00. At that time,$115,000.00 was requested,but only $60,000.00
was approved. The actual cost for the preparation of the architectural plans currently stands at
$17,756.30 which only leaves $42,243.70 to be spent on the actual construction. Verbal estimates
from reputable contractors range between $60,000.00 and $65,000.00 for the construction phase of
the project. The additional $20,000.00 requested will allow the previously approved and under
funded CIP to be completed as originally intended and designed.
2. Project Location (if applicable):
11000 N. La Canada Dr. The addition would be to the Administration Building(basement area
only).
3. How does this project improve public health, safety, and welfare?
Adequate work and bathroom facilities should enhance employee productivity and provide better
service to the public. Presently the Building Inspectors are tightly squeezed into an undersized
office space in the basement that was not designed to accommodate the 8 inspectors, or the addition
of future staff. Currently, there are no toilet facilities in the basement which is essential for the
current staff as well as for others who will be utilizing this space. The shower rooms currently
located in the basement are not in compliance with the Arizonan's With Disabilities Act or Federal
ADA requirements. Failure to allocate the additional funds will result either in an incomplete or
inadequate facility for staff members.
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
The project would improve services provided to our citizens and customers.
5. How does this project impact the Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. The total project costs are estimated at $801000.00 consisting of the originally approved
$60,000.00 in addition to the requested $20,000.00
B.None
6. How does this project have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. Currently the building inspectors and Chief Building Inspector are located in a cramped
substandard office space located in the basement of the Town Hall. Employee performance and
p
moral would increase if the em.lo ees were located in an office s.ace that has been desi• ed and
constructed to accommodate them,their equipment, books, plans and files.
B. If not funded the Town will have no office s•ace for their future Fire Marshal and the ins•ection
staff will be required to work in substandard conditions. Failure to allocate the additional funds will
result either in an incomplete or inadequate facility for staff members.
7. How does this project impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
8. Does this project answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
The shower rooms currently located in the basement that are proposed to be upgraded to full
bathrooms are not currently in compliance with the Arizonan's With Disabilities Act or Federal
ADA requirements. There is a potential of future litigation for noncompliance. Substandard working
conditions could result in future litigation.
9. Is this project coordinated with other project(s)to create significant savings of time, money, and
convenience?
No and not applicable to this request.
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$, 000)
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list(in thousands of dollars)the total project cost,the capital funds requested from the Town, and
allp robable, outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Outside Funds
Year Cost Funds Amount Source Amount Source Amount Source
2003 — `04$ $ $ .$ .$
2004— `05$60 $60 ,$ $, $
2005— `06$20 $20 ,$ �$ $
12006— '07$ $ $ ,$ $
2007— `08$ $ _$ $ 1 $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
Please list(in thousands of dollars)the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The"Total Cost"for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total Costs Savings Projected Savings
_
Year Cost Personnel Other - Amount Source Amount Source
2003 — '04 $ $ $ $ Lease Savings From Modular$11.4
2004— '05 $ $ $ $ Lease Savings From Modular$11.4
2005 — '06 $ $ $ $ Lease Savings From Modular$11.4
2006— '07 $ $ $ $ Lease Savings From Modular$11.4
2007— '08 $ $ $ $ Lease Savings From Modular$11.4
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005— '06 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
PROJECT NAME: Vehicle Replacement Number:
Department: Building Safety (242) Department Priority: 1 (High)
1. Project Description:
Replacement of older Building Safety Division vehicles. The vehicles that need to be replaced for this fiscal year are two 1994 Chevy S-10 pickups. Town policy (SOP #34) states that"all vehicles will be
sent to auction and removed from service after the vehicle reaches 100,000 miles or 10 years of service,
whichever comes first". These vehicles have now passed the age threshold of 10 years (will be 11+years
b fiscal 2005 and are in serious need of re placement. The miles that are Gut on ins section vehicles are
very hard due to the nature of the job. These vehicles endure constant stop and go, as well as start and
stop, due to multiple daily inspection locations. The vehicles also have to endure quite a lot of stationary
idling, once again reducing their longevity. If they are not replaced, we are a risk of being without the
necessary vehicles to provide inspections to the public, due to down time for expensive repairs.
2. Project Location (if applicable):
3. How does this project improve Public Health, Safety, and Welfare?
Inspection of buildings constructed within the Town assures that the structures will be safe for use
by the public.ublic. Without reliable vehicles to get to the building sites,the inspectors are not able to
perform their inspections on a timely basis as expected. The replacement vehicles will be equipped
with extended cabs, which will provide space to neatly store necessary books and other materials
needed to perform the inspections correctly. This will also provide a safer working environment for
the inspectors. Currently the front seat and passenger floor board are filled with code books, tools,
and other materials, providing no passenger room in the cabs. It is occasionally necessary to have
more than one inspector traveling to the same location, and this inhibits us from doing that by means
of a single vehicle.
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
This will allow the Building Safety staff to have a reliable vehicle to respond to requested
inspections in a timely manner. It also meets the stated long term goal of removing vehicles from
service after 10 years. This project (for one vehicle) was included in the last two years' CIP requests,
and the 2nd one was in last years' request and not granted. As a result, the mechanical cost impact for
each of the vehicles was about $1500.00. Both vehicles have work that will need to be done to them,
besides mechanical,to them to bring them up to a presentable standard for use. For instance, the seat
upholstery fabric is torn on the drivers' side of both vehicles, and the seat springs are exposed. In
addition, newer vehicles will be more fuel efficient and will have lower emissions. These vehicles
are constantly in the public view, and should not have a ramshackle worn out appearance.
5. How does this project impact the Town's fiscal resources?
The cost of each vehicle would be approximately $20,000. Looking at the whole picture there would
be a minimal cost to maintain a new vehicle. This is just the opposite of what is necessary for older
vehicles, which are at a point where they need more frequent repairs at increasingly higher costs.
The cost impact is minimized by providing only the most basic small sized vehicle needed to
adequately perform the job.
6. How does this project have an effect on Town's service levels?
This project will maintain the currently expected high service level by providing staff with a reliable
vehicle to respond to requested inspections in a timely manner. When a vehicle is down for repairs
the inspector is not able to respond to requested inspections and our customers will then not receive
the timely services they deserve.
7. How does this project impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
The purchase of new vehicles will reduce the operation and maintenance cost for the Town, since the
new vehicles will be under warranty,and will not need expensive repairs associated with age. In
addition, newer vehicles will have higher fuel efficiency than we are currently experiencing_
S. Does this project answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
NO
9. Is this project coordinated with other project(s) to create significant savings of time, money,
and convenience?
The Building Safety Department is in the process of implementing disaster mitigation measures.
Having room in the vehicles for the materials needed for this project is very important. If there is no
room available,the existing vehicles will have to be retrofitted with secure bed compartments, which
will be costly, but necessary.
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$, 000)
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list(in thousands of dollars)the total project cost,the capital funds requested from the Town, and
all probable, outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Outside Funds
Year Cost Funds Amount Source Amount Source Amount Source
2002 — `03 $ $ $
2003 — `04$ $ $ $ $
2004— `05$ $ $ $ $
t2005 — 'O6$4O $40 $ $ $
2006— `07$ $ $ $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
Please list(in thousands of dollars)the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements,rovements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The "Total Cost"for each year
p
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings _ Projected Savings
Year Cost Personnel_ Other Amount y Source Amount Source
2002— `03 $ $ _$ .$
2003 — `04 $ $ $ $
2004—`05 $ $ $ $
2005 —'06 $1 $ Maint. & $4 Less Fuel $3 Less Fuel
Fuel & Maint. �&Maint.
2006— `07 $ $ $ _ $
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005—2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
' replacement vehicles Number:
PROJECT NAME: Oro Valley Transit Services/Coyote Run p
li Works Department/Transit Services Division Department Priority:
Department: Pub c p
1. Project Description: Two (2)replacement vehicles for use in the Town of Oro Valley's Transit
Services Division.sion.
These vehicles will be used for the Town's owned & operated transit service for
elderly & disabled residents—Coyote Run
this a rollover project? no List any FY that it was previously funded in:
Is
2. Project Location (if applicable):
Vehicles to be incorporated into the Town of Oro Valley's's Transit Division Facilities located at 680
W. Calle Concordia in Oro Valley.
How does this project improve public and/or employee health, safety, and welfare?
3. p
Coyote Run providestransportation the trans ortation needs of the elderly and disabled persons in our community
y
of Oro
valley. Without the services of Coyote Run these individuals would not have access to life's
necessities & these vehicles will replace high mileage high maintenance vehicles in the fleet.
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
This project supportsthe goals of both the Town's General Plan as well as the Town's Transit
Development Plan.
5. How does this project impact the Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
p
funded these vehicles will be purchased using Surface Transportation Program (STP)funds that
A. If
g
are
"flexed" from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). In flexing the funds, the Town will
be able top urchase two Coyote Run vehicles with only a 5.7% local match. (i.e. purchase two
vehicles at $120,000 for $6,840.00.
B. Based on historical data for vehicle repair and maintenance: if these vehicles are not funded, it is
very probable that the Town will need to pay more in annual vehicle repair and maintenance cost's
more than the total local match of$6 840.00 and 'eo.ardize the safet of our •assen•ers.
6. What is the desired service level: Nine (9) vehicles in the fleet and 70 to 75 trips per day.
project
does this have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. If funded it will allow Coyote Run to meet the growing demands for service in our community.
B. If not funded, service levels will not be met or maintained and we will have to deny trips &the
safety of our passengers will be jeopardized.
7. How does thisp roject impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
Vehicle repair and maintenance costs are reduced with the purchase of new transit vehicles & the new vehicles are covered under manufacturer warranties.
8. Does thisJ
ro'ect answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
p
No
1
9. Is this project coordinated with other project(s)to create significant savings of time, money, and
convenience? Describe. (Report projected cost savings on the reverse side.)
This project saves the Town costly vehicle repairs and maintenance costs& provides for a lower
local match. Coyote Run works closely with Sun Tran to make transportation available in our
community..
2
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$, 000)
• replacement vehicles Number: 1
Services/Coyote Run
PROJECT NAME: Oro Valley Transit
CAPITAL COSTS
listdollars) the total project cost, the capital funds requested from the Town, all
Please (in thousands of
probable outside funding
sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
• Outside Funds Outside Funds , Carry Banked
Fiscal Total Town
Source Forward Funds
Funds Amount Source Amount
Year Cost
— ` 0 $ $ $000 $6840.00 $113,160 STP
2005 06$12 _
— '07 $ $ $ $ $
200 V(/� $ r
— 8 $ $ $ $
2007 0 $ $
2008 `09$ $ $ $ ,$ $
_ � o
2009 1 $ $ $ $ $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars) operating total o erating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel,
leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
p
(efficiency
improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The"Total Cost" for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
Year Cost Personnel_ Other _Amount Source Amount_ Source
2005 — `06 $ $ $*200.00 $ $
2006— '07 $ $ ,$ $ $
2007— `08 $ $ $ $ $
2008— `09 $ $ $ $ _ $
2009— '10 $ $ $ $ $
* Approximate other cost associated with two new vehicles for one year.
EVALUATION(for TAC use only)
Assumption Project: Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety,Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
3
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005—2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
PROJECT NAME: Computer Replacement Program Number:
Department: All Departments—Information Technology Department Priority: 1
1. Project Description:escri tiNecessaryreplacement of 87 computers for all departments due to age and/or
inability
to load new State, Countyand Town mandated software. Helps ensure compatibility with
future systems and software.
Is this a rolloverJro'ect? No List any FY that it was previously funded in:
p
2. Project Location(if applicable):
All municipal locations.
3. How does thisJro'ect improve public and/or employee health, safety, and welfare?
P
Police Department -Provides effective and efficient access to Information and Law Enforcement
data bases to quickly and accurately provide public safety.
How does this project support stated community goals?
Helps ensure a high level of public service and safety for the community.
S. How does this project impact the Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. This is an efficiency project. New computers and will provide for faster and more efficient
informationP rocessing with little or no equipment breakdown and employee down time.
B. Breakdowns causing down time and loss of customer service.
6. What is the desired service level:
How does thisJro'ect have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
P
A. Provides Town employees more efficient,faster, and reliable information for the most efficient
customer service level.
B. It helps to
ensure that the Town's hardware infrastructure is better able to provide easily
accessible information to all.
7. How does this project impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
Removes maintenance costs of older machines. The older computers require high maintenance costs
as well as down time for employees. The new machines would decrease these costs drastically,
8. Does thisp roj ect answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
Yes, the State of Arizona, Pima County Courts & Attorney's Offices require reports in a timely
manner. Public information requests are very important and must be handled immediately.
9. Is thisJ
ro j ect coordinated with other project(s) to create significant savings of time,money, and
p
convenience? Describe. (Report projected cost savings on the reverse side.)
Yes, it is coordinated with the Technology Lifecycle Program of the Information Systems Division.
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands-4, 000)
PROJECT NAME: Computer Replacement Program Number:
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars) the total project cost, the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Carry Banked
Year Cost Funds Amount Source Amount _ Source _ Forward Funds
2005— `06$87 $87 $ $ $
2006— `07$50 $50 $ $ $ $
2007— `08$50 $50 $ $ $ $
2008— `09$ $ $ _ $ _ $ $
2009— `10$ $ $ $ $ $
•
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars) the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements,rovements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The "Total Cost" for each year
p
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
ear Cost Personnel Other Amount Source _Amount Source
2005 — '06 $ $ $ $10 Maintenance $
2006— '07 $ $ $ $10 Maintenance $
2007— '08 $ $ $ $10 •Maintenance $
2008 — `09 $ $ $ $ $
2009— `10 $ $ $ $ $ _
EVALUATION(for TAC use only)
Assumption Project: Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety,Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005—2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
PROJECT NAME: Server Hardware U._ ade Number:
Department: All Departments—Information Technology Department Priority: 3
1. Project Description:
This project involves upgrading four of the Town's file servers. These servers are using hardware
that is nearly 4 years old. Upgrading will ensure compatibility with future systems, and ensure
adequate storage for the ever increasing number of applications and files being stored on them.
2. Project Location (if applicable):
Town hall.
3. How does this project improve public health, safety, and welfare?
Provides more reliable access to information needed to serve the public.
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
Helps ensure a high level of public service for the community.
5. How does this project impact the Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. This is an efficiency project. New hardware systems provide for faster and more efficient
information and application processing, reliability, and future hardware updates. It will also provide
for little or no equipment breakdown and employee down time
B. Increased server down time due to lack of support from Microsoft and incompatibility with new
hardware and software, causing a loss of customer service.
6. How does this project have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. Provides Town employees more efficient, faster, and reliable information for the most efficient
customer service level.
B. Increased server down time due to lack of support from Microsoft and incompatibility with new
hardware and software, causing a loss of customer service.
7. How does this project impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
It provides a network infrastructure that can deliver high reliability, efficient management, ease of
use and supports the latest advances in networking hardware. It also removes a significant cost of
maintaining older hardware.
8. Does this project answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
Not applicable. This is an efficiency project.
9. Is this project coordinated with other project(s) to create significant savings of time, money, and
convenience?
Yes, it is coordinated with the Technology Lifecycle Program of the Information Systems Division.
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$, 000)
PROJECT NAME: Server Hardware Upgrade Number:
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars) the total project cost, the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Carry Banked
ear Cost Funds Amount Source Amount Source Forward Funds
2005 — `06$20 $20 $ $ $ $
2006— '075 $ $ $ $ $
2007— `08$ $ $ $ $ $
2008 — `09$ $ $ $ $ $
2009— `10$ $ $ $ $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
r the total operating and maintenance costs includingadditional
Please list (in thousands of dollars) p g
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings p J g g
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The "Total Cost" for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
ear Cost Personnel Other Amount Source Amount Source
2005— `06 $ $ $ $ $
2006— '07 $ $ $ $ $
2007— '08 $ $ $ $ $
2008 — `09 $ $ $ $ $
2009— `10 $ $ $ $ $
EVALUATION (for TAC use only)
Assumption Project:Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety, Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005—2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
PROJECT NAME: Phone System Upgrade—Redundancy/Police Autonomy Number:
Department: All Departments Department Priority: 4
1. Project Description: This .ro'ect will us. ade the Town's shone s stem •rovidin_ for redundanc in
the case of catastrophic or crisis event. It will also allow the Police Department to maintain
telecommunications abilities in the event of s stem failure of the srimar e•ui.ment in the
Administration Building.
Project Location (if applicable):
Administration Building/Police Department
2. How does this project improve public and/or employee health, safety, and welfare?
It will help to insure telecommunications reliability for the Police Department in the event of
primary equipment failure in the Administration Building.
3. How does this project support stated community goals?
Redundancy in the phone equipment will minimize down-time due to equipment failure, providing
un-interrupted customer service to citizens.
5. How does this project impact the Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. If funded, there will be a one-time expense of$40000 for equipment and installation and
approximately$2000 additional yearly maintenance and support.
B. If not funded, catastrophic failure of the Town telecommunications systems will have a major
impact on our ability to provide services to citizens.
6. What is the desired service level: Maintain telecommunications services 24X7.
How does this project have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. If funded this •ro'ect will minimize .roductivit loss due to shone s stem failure.
B. If not funded, failure of the Town's phone systems will have a significant impact on service levels
due to the inability to communicate with citizens and employees.
7. How does this project impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
The project will increase the annual maintenance contract by approximately $2000 per year.
8. Does this project answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
Yes, the Town is obligated to provide emergency services to the citizens.
9. Is this project coordinated with other project(s) to create significant savings of time, money, and
convenience? Describe. (Report projected cost savings on the reverse side.)
No.
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$, 000)
PROJECT NAME: Number:
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars)the total project cost, the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
(Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Carry Banked
Year Cost Funds Amount Source Amount Source Forward Funds
2005 — `06$40 $40 $ $ $ $
2006— `07$ $ $ $ $ $
2007— `08$ $ $ $ $ $
2008 — `09$ $ $ $ $ $
2009— '10$ $ $ $ $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
Please list(in thousands of dollars) the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The"Total Cost"for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
Year Cost Personnel Other Amount Source Amount Source
2005 — `06 $ $ $ $ $
2006— `07 $2000 $ ,$ $ $
2007— `08 $2000 $ $ $ $
2008— `09 $2000 $ $ $ $
2009— `10 $2000 $ $ $ $
EVALUATION (for TAC use only)
Assumption Project:Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety,Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005—2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
PROJECT NAME: Monitor Replacement Number: •
Department: All Departments—Information Technology Department Priority: 5
1. Project Description: This project will replace all remaining CRT based monitors with LCD monitors.
New LCD monitors save energy, reduce eye strain,and allow users to regain limited desk space,.
Is this a rollover project? N List any FY that it was previously funded in:
2. Project Location (if applicable):
All Locations.
3. How does this project improve public and/or employee health, safety, and welfare?
CRT monitors emit radiation that, over time, causes eye strain which can impact employee
productivity. Employees will also regain almost two square feet of desk space, allowing for better
productivity.
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
Improving employee productivity and lowering energy costs.
5. How does this project impact the Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. It is estimated to save the Town approximately$2400 per year in electricity consumption.
LStatistics from the Energy Information Administration) Additional savings are also realized due to
decreased heat out.ut of LCD monitors lowerin_ air-conditionin• costs in the summer months.
B. Higher energy costs.
6. What is the desired service level:
How does this project have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. This project will increase service levels because of the reduction of eye-strain related
productivity loss and increased workspace.
B. Continued productivity loss due to eye-strain.
7. How does this project impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
Electricity costs will be reduced due to lower power consumption and lower heat generation.
8. Does this project answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
No.
9. Is this project coordinated with other project(s) to create significant savings of time, money, and
convenience? Describe. (Report projected cost savings on the reverse side.) No.
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$, 000)
PROJECT NAME: Monitor Replacement Number: 5
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list(in thousands of dollars) the total project cost, the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Carry Banked
ear Cost Funds Amount Source Amount Source Forward Funds
2005 — `06$38 $38 $ $ $ $
2006— `07$ $ $ $ $ $
2007— `08$ $ $ $ $ $
2008 '095 $ $ $ $ $
2009— `10$ $ $ $ $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars)the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so-on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
g
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The"Total Cost" for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
ear Cost Personnel Other Amount Source Amount Source
2005 — `06 $ $ $ $ $
2006— `07 $ $ $ $ $
2007— `08 $ $ $ $ $
2008 — `09 $ $ $ $ $
2009— `10 $ $ $ $ $
EVALUATION (for TAC use only)
Assumption Project: Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety,Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
MEMORANDUM
TO: David Andrews, Finance Director
FROM: Kevin Verville, Information Technology Administrator 1(1
DATE: November 23, 2004
SUBJ: CIP Project - Integrated Finance and Human Resources Software
The enclosed 2005-2006 CIP Project Sheet is for a proposed Integrated Finance/HR Software
System. Since we have not been able to secure formal RFP's as of yet, I am basing the cost
estimates of thisp roject on research of other jurisdictions comparable in size to Oro Valley that have recently completed, or are in the process of completing this ambitious project. In
addition to size, these jurisdictions have faced similar challenges and have many of the same
requirements that Oro Valley does. I expect this project to be implemented over a period of
twelve to eighteen months due to its size and scope.
A breakdown of the cost estimate for this project is depicted in the table below.
Item Description X ' } s of
/ Tota Amour r
Cosi
Application Software . 55% .$192,500
::....
Trainingan....d Implementation Si....»} i4f
teiwSIv
Y
:•::
k:.....4:: : ..
;.
Server Hardware/Software 5% $17,500
. ...
......... .
:..v:.D: :..t. bae
: onversion .vF:4" A:.ni. .
.,..: .x..?r..•Kv:.✓;i:.y,::r}.SA;::.•;:,;...::•::
r•i;l{:?
f},'..}.i}?.i}ii.
;
}i
$17,500
.
Total 100% $350,000
2005-2006 Capital Improvements Program
Integrated Financia( and Human Resources Software
Project Overview
One of the most basic functions provided to the citizens by the Town is acting as steward of public
monies and tax proceeds. In order to fulfill this responsibility in an effective and efficient manner, it
is necessary for the Town to implement modern information systems to handle financial issues.
These financial issues may range from purchasing of goods and services, to payments to vendors, to
receipt of funds, to budgetary controls, and many others. Closely related to these issues, especially
considering the scope of personnel related costs as a percent of the entire Town budget, is the need
for capable human resources and payroll systems.
To ensure the Town can continue with its tradition of excellent financial management, it has become
necessary to look at the implementation of a new system. Besides the age and increased
obsolescence of a system placed in operation a decade ago, the Town also struggles with increasing
laws, mandates, and other regulations regarding our handling of financial transactions and associated
information. These demands have reached a point that exceeds the capabilities of our current
system to grow and accommodate these changes.
A modern system should include the ability to provide E-Government services by the use of web-
based technologies, and to electronically exchange information with the Town's business partners
and citizens of Oro Valley. The Town is looking forward to a solution that provides excellent
reporting tools to enable effective management of data and the system, as well as improving
accessibility for other departments to access the information they require in the manner most
appropriate and efficient.
The following business goals have been identified for an optimal financial/HR management system:
■Timely access to appropriate information
•Access to real time data
• Empower clients (primarily other departments) with access to relevant data and the ability to
create their own reports
• Enhanced customer service through a web-enabled solution, including E-Government
■A consistent look and feel across all modules
•An "off the shelf" product that requires little customization
• Effective working partnership with the vendor
•Quick and easy export and other data management tools
•Ability to meet the reporting requirements of the State of Arizona
• Greater security control enabling access to more people on an as needed basis
•On-line help
•Modeling techniques (i.e. what if scenarios)
With the potential change in financial and HR systems, the Town recognizes the opportunity to
engage in major business re-engineering efforts. The primary focus of these efforts will be the
automation of processes, including their initiation at points outside the Finance Department. It is
expected that the system will be scalable and flexible to enable the Town to continue to grow in its
business processes, and in its ability to enhance customer (external and internal) service levels.
The Town will be requesting a proposal for the following application software modules:
General Ledger
Budget Preparation and Management
Accounts Payable
Revenue and Cash Receipting
Purchase Orders
Bid and Quote Management
Contract Management
Inventory Management
Fixed Assets
Project/Grant Accounting
Job Cost Accounting (activity based)
GASB Reporting
Ad Hoc Report Writing
Payroll Processing (including electronic timesheets)
Personnel Management
Applicant Tracking
Flexible Spending Account Management
Benefits Administration
Worker's Compensation Administration
Retirement Tracking.
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005—2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
PROJECT NAME: Integrate/Upgrade Financial & HR Applications Number:
Department: Information Technology Department Priority: 3
1. Project Description: The Town's current financial accounting and Human Resources
systems provide a central service to all other Town Departments. The current
systems need to be replaced with a more modern system that provides a
comprehensive and highly integrated solution. A new financial accounting and
Human Resources system is a strategic step towards establishing the E-Government
mode of operation.
Is this a rollover project? N List any FY that it was previously funded in: None
2. Project Location(if applicable): Administration
3. How does this project improve public and/or employee health, safety, and welfare?
This project can improve employee welfare with benefits such as performance
appraisal routing, self service applications, open enrollment, and benefits
administration.
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
It will enhance operations within the Finance and Human Resources Departments,
improve support to the other Town Departments, and increase effectiveness in
dealings with vendors, customers, and citizens.
5. How does this project impact the Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. If funded, this project will enhance data sharing and integration within Finance
and HR, improving support to other Departments which will increase operational
efficiency.
B. If not funded, manual processes will continue resulting in continued operational
inefficiency. In addition, the current systems are becoming increasingly difficult
and more expensive to maintain.
6. What is the desired service level:
Give users access to their Departmental financial information in a timely manner,
enhance data sharing and integration, and improve support to other Town
Departments.
How does this project have an effect on Town's service levels,A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. If funded, will increase effectiveness in dealings with vendors, customers,
citizens, and other departments.
B. Primarily, HR staff currently use manual processes to perform several core
business activities including; performance evaluations, benefits administration, and
recruitment. The Finance Department prepares monthly departmental financial
statements and distributes them to the Departments for their review and analysis.
Because of the technical limitations of the Fund Balance System, most Departments
manually track this financial information in shadow systems so that they can
perform their own analysis.
7. How does this project impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
This project will require an investment of $350K-$500K, with ongoing annual
maintenance and support costing approximately 100 of the purchase price.
8. Does this project answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
The Town is required to provide timely accounting reports to auditors, State
agencies, and vendors.
9. Is this project coordinated with other project(s)to create significant savings of time, money, and
convenience? Describe. (Report projected cost savings on the reverse side.)
This project is outlined in the IT Strategic Plan.
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$, 000)
PROJECT NAME: Integrate/Upgrade Financial & HR Applications Number:
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list(in thousands of dollars)the total project cost,the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
(Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Carry Banked
Year Cost _ Funds Amount _ Source Amount Source Forward Funds
2005—`06$350 $350 $ ,$ $ $
2006—`07$ $ $ $ $ $
2007— `08$ $ $ $ $ $
2008— `09$ $ $ $ _ $ $
2009— '10$ $ $ $ $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
Please list(in thousands of dollars)the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The"Total Cost"for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
(Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
'Year Cost Personnel_ Other Amount Source Amount Source
2005— `06 $30 $ $ $ _ $
2006—'07 $30 $ $ $ _ $
2007— `08 $30 $ $ $ .$
2008—`09 $30 $ $ $ $
2009—`10 $30 $ $ $ $
EVALUATION(for TAC use only)
Assumption Project: Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety,Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005—2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
PROJECT NAME: Pick-Up Truck Number:
Department: Planning and Zoning—Community Development Department Priority: 1
1. Project Description: Pick-up truck for the Senior Zoning Inspector Supervisor. Currently no vehicle
assigned to this position.
Is this a rollover project? No, List any FY that it was previously funded in:
2. Project Location (if applicable): N/A
3. How does this project improve public and/or employee health, safety, and welfare?
This will allow the public to immediately identify the Zoning Inspector as an employee and insure
that the necessary tools are available on the truck while working. This vehicle will assist in the
general provision of zoning compliance inspections.
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
To inspect and patrol zoning compliance for commercial maintenance; signs; subdivision site
inspections; salvage and violation inspections.
5. How does this project impact the Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A.No impact on revenue; cost to purchase $20,000; will increase the cost for vehicle maintenance.
B. The zoning division will be down a vehicle for field work.
6. What is the desired service level: To provide the Zoning staff with a Town vehicle to utilize while
completing requisite tasks. This will allow the public to identify a Town employee, also to insure
that the necessary tools are available on the truck while working.
How does this project have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. This vehicle will allow the Supervisor to operate out of a Town identified vehicle equipped with
the appropriate tools.
B. The Supervisor will not be identifiable as a Town employee and will not have the proper tools
when driving a personal vehicle. Additionally, the Division will continue to be down a vehicle for
field work.
7. How does this project impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
This project will increase O&M costs for vehicle maintenance.
8. Does this project answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
No.
9. Is this project coordinated with other project(s) to create significant savings of time, money, and
convenience? Describe. (Report projected cost savings on the reverse side.)
No.
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$,000)
PROJECT NAME: Pick-Up Truck Number:
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list(in thousands of dollars)the total project cost,the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
(Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Carry Banked
Year Cost Funds Amount Source Amount Source Forward _ Funds
2005 — '06$20 $20 $ $ $ $
2006— `07$ $ $ $ $ $
2007— `08$ $ $ ,$ $ $
2008— `09$ $ $ $ $ $
2009— '10$ $ $ $ $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
Please list(in thousands of dollars)the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The"Total Cost"for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
Year Cost Personnel Other Amount Source Amount Source
2005— `06 $ $ $ $
2006— `07 $ . $ 1 $ _ $
2007— `08 $ $ 1.5 $ $
2008— `09 $ $ 1.5 $ $
2009— 'l0 $ $ 2 $ $
EVALUATION(for TAC use only)
Assumption Project:Yes No
Score Criterion � Score Criterion
Health, Safety, Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005 — '06 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
PROJECT NAME: Replace three (3)Pick-up trucks Number:
Department: Public Works Department Priority: 1
1. Project Description:
Replace a 1994 F-150 (Vehicle No. E-1004, Milage: 65,000), 1995 Bronco(Vehicle No. E-1005,
Milage: 74,573) and a chevy 5-10 (Vehicle No. E-1008, Milage: 72,772). These trucks were funded in
FY 2004-05': however, because of additional staff to the Engineering Division, these trucks were
assigned to new staff.
2. Project Location(if applicable):
N/A
3. How does this project improve public health, safety, and welfare?
These vehicles are necessary for Town staff to conduct their daily work schedule activities
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
These vehicles will provide dependable reliable transportation to our staff so that daily work schedules
are not interrupted by broken down vehicles and thus provide better service to the community.
5. How does this project impact the Town's fiscal resources,A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. Will initially cost money to buy these vehicles, but will save money in shop costs.
B. Will increase maintenance costs,thus more money would need to be allocated to maintenance.
6. How does this project have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. Will increase level of service buy not having staff waiting for vehicles to be repaired.
B. Will lower level of service when vehicles are in the shop for repairs
7. How does this project impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
The operation and maintenance costs will go down by having new and more efficient vehicles
8. Does this project answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
No
9. Is this project coordinated with other project(s)to create significant savings of time, money, and
convenience?
Yes—we have several construction projects and the inspectors need to travel between and within
project.
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$, 000)
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars)the total project cost,the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Carry Banked
Year Cost Funds Amount Source Amount Source Forward Funds
2005— `06 $54 $54 $ $ $ $
2006—'07,$ $ $ $ $ $
2007— '08_$ $ $ $ $ $
2008— `09$ $ $ $ $ $
2009— '10$ $ $ $ $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M)COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars) the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The "Total Cost" for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
Year Cost Personnel Other Amount Source Amount Source
2004— `OS $10 $ $ $ $
2005 — `06 $ $ $ $ $
2006— `07 $ $ $ $ $
2007— `08 $ ,$ $ $ $
2008— `09 $ $ $ $ $
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005 —2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
PROJECT NAME: Glover :East of La Cholla to Mountain. Breeze Dr. Number:
Department: Public Works Department Priority: 2
1. Project Description: Pedestrian and Bike separated path
Is this a rollover project? No, List any FY that it was previously funded in:
2. Project Location(if applicable):
Glover : east of La Cholla to Desert Vista
3. How does this project improve public and/or employee health, safety, and welfare?
Provide a separated path for pedestrian and bikes (especially students from Wilson Richard School)
to traverse safely along Glover Road. This path will line up with the path west of La Cholla which
connects to Wilson Richard School thus crating a continuity path from Wilson School to Mountain
Breeze Drive.
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
Improve public safety
5. How does this project impact the Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A.CIP request for FY 04/05
B.
6. What is the desired service level:
How does this project have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. Improve safety
B. Not in compliance with Town Council policy of implementing Ped and Bike plan
7. How does this project impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
See 0 & M table
8. Does this project answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
N/A
9. Is this project coordinated with other project(s)to create significant savings of time, money, and
convenience? Describe. (Report projected cost savings on the reverse side.)
None
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$, 000)
PROJECT NAME: Glover :East of La Cholla to Mountain Breeze Dr. Number:
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars) the total project cost, the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Carry Banked
Year Cost Funds Amount Source Amount Source Forward Funds
2005 — `06$150 $150 $ $ $ $
2006— `07$ $ $ $ $ $
2007— `08$ $ $ $ $ $
2008—`09$ $ $ $ $ $
2009— 10 10$ $ $ $ $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars) the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The"Total Cost"for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
Year Cost Personnel Other Amount Source Amount Source
2005— `06 $ $ $ $ $
2006— `07 $ $ $ $ $
2007— `08 $ $ $ $ $
2008— `09 $ $ $ $ $
2009— '10 $ $ $ $
EVALUATION(for TAC use only)
Assumption Project: Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety, Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005 —2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
PROJECT NAME: Sun Ridge and Coyote Ridge Number: _
Department: Public Works Department Priority: 3
1. Project Description: Construct 2 foot wedge curb
Is this a rollover project?N/A List any FY that it was previously funded in:
2. Project Location(if applicable):
Sun Ridge and Coyote Ridge Subdivisions
3. How does this project improve public and/or employee health, safety, and welfare?
Prolong the life span of the pavement and restore the integrity of the street and neighborhoods.
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
Preserve Town property by providing structural support to the existing asphalt edges and contain
surface runoff within pavement
5. How does this project impact the Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. Design and construction cost borne by the Town(I-TURF)
B.
6. What is the desired service level: Maintain
How does this project have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. Maintain existing level of service
B.
7. How does this project impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
See O &M table
8. Does this project answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
N/A
9. Is this project coordinated with other project(s)to create significant savings of time, money, and
convenience? Describe. (Report projected cost savings on the reverse side.)
N/A
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$, 000)
PROJECT NAME: Sun Ridge and Coyote Ridge Number:
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars)the total project cost, the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Carry Banked
Year Cost Funds Amount Source Amount Source Forward Funds
2005 — `06$40 $40 $ $ $ $
2006— `07$ $ $ $ $ $
2007— `08$ $ $ $ $ $
2008— `09$ •
$ $ $ $ $
2009— '10$ $ $ $ $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M)COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars) the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The "Total Cost"for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
Year Cost Personnel Other Amount Source Amount Source
2005 — `06 $ $ $ $ $
2006— `07 $ $ $ $ $
2007— `08 $ $ $ $ $
2008— `09 $ $ $ $ $
2009— `10 $ $ $ $ $
EVALUATION(for TAC use only)
Assumption Project: Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety, Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT SHEET
.
FY 2005 —2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
Sign& Striping Utility Bed and Accessories
PROJECT NAME: Number:
Department: Public Works Department Priority: 4
1. Project Descri tion: Purchase new utility bed and accessories for existing signing and striping
p - bedprovides for storage of tools, bolts, nuts and posts.
truck. The utility g
The accessories include a generator&hydraulic post driver and remover.
Is this a rollover project? No List any FY that it was previously funded in: N/A
2. Project Location(if applicable):
N/A
3. How does this project improve public and/or employee health, safety, and welfare?
Provides the Town the ability to install streets signs more quickly and safely with less physical
strain on employee& The increase in speed will reduce employee exposure to traffic and in
some cases reduce traffic delays_
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
N/A
5. How does this project impact the Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. Purchase cost will be approximately $20,000. These items are crucial for efficiency of the
signing and striping crew.
B.
-. •t. li .* I- ' S is . IS 1 S . - . . 8 crewIS t'• . • . ' 1 •' S
6. What is the desired service level: N/A
How does this project have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A.
B.
7. How does this project.impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
signs will be installed much morequicklyand with more efficiency.
Street g y
8. D this project answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
QN/A
9. Is this project coordinated with other project(s)to create significant savings of time, money, and
convenience? Describe. (Report projected cost savings on the reverse side.)
N/A
PROJECT BUDGET
' (All Costs in Thousands--$,000)
Sign& Striping Utility Bed and Accessories
PROJECT NAME: Number:
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars) the total project cost,the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Carry Banked
Year Cost Funds Amount Source Amount Source , Forward Funds
2005—'06$ 20 $ 20 $ ,$ _ $ $
2006— `07$ $ $ $ $ $
2007— `08$ $ $ $ $ $
2008— `09$ $ $ $ _ .$ $
2009—10$ $ $ $ $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M)COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars) the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The"Total Cost"for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
Year Cost Personnel Other _Amount Source Amount Source
2005 — '06 $ <.4> $ $ $ .4 Efficiency $
2006— '07 $ <.8> $ $ $ .8 Efficiency $
2007— '08 $ <1> $ $ $ 1 Efficiency $
2008— `09 $ <1> $ $ $ 1 Efficiency $
2009— '10 $ <1.2> $ $ $ 1.2 Efficiency $
EVALUATION (for TAC use only)
Assumption Project: Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety, Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005–2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
Multi-use path/underpass motorized sweeper
PROJECT NAME: Number:
Department: Public Works Department Priority: 5
Purchase new motorized sweeper for the multi-use paths and
1. Project Description:
underpasses.
Is this a rolloverJ
ro•ect? No List any FY that it was previously funded in: N/A
p
2. Project Location(if applicable):
N/A
How does this project improve public and/or employee health, safety, and welfare?
3. p
Provides the Town the ability to quickly, safely and efficiently sweep the existing and new
multi-purpose lanes also will provide ability to sweep the multi-use path underpasses.
Accumulation of sediment_and debris approaching and beneath underpasses is hazard to hikers_
The new up
equipment will not kick debris and minimizes hazards to pedestrians.
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
N/A
5. How does thisp roject impact the Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
Purchase cost will be approximately$75,000. These items are crucial for efficiency and
A.
- . "- , •• • - f" . f" f" • " ' i - - i. "L.
B •. •. IS - •• • .11' . 9• • • •. 55. 1111• - • .11 I. IS 'I .$ 11- 1 • O• • •I
the present inventory.
6. What is the desired service level: N/A
How does thisp roject have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A.
B.
7. How does this project impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
Town staff respondefficiently will be able to to need to sweep multi-use paths and underpasses.
—The underpasses accumulate significant amounts of debris and the Town has no equipment to
remove the debris.
8. D this project answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
N/A
9. Is thisJroject coordinated with other project(s)to create significant savings of time, money, and
p
convenience? Describe. (Report projected cost savings on the reverse side.)
N/A
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$, 000)
Multi-use path/underpass motorized sweeper
PROJECT NAME: Number: _
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars) the total project cost, the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Carry Banked
Year Cost Funds Amount Source Amount Source Forward Funds
2005 — `06$ 75 $ 75 $ $ $ $
2006— `07$ $ $ $ $ $
2007— `08$ $ $ $ $ $
2008— `09$ $ $ $$ $
2009— '10$ $ $ $ $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars)the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The"Total Cost" for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
Year Cost Personnel Other Amount Source Amount Source
2005— '06 $ <5> $ 4 $ 1 $ 10 Rental $
2006—'07 $ <6> $ 4 $ 1 $ 11 Rental $
2007— '08 $ <7> $ 4 $ 1 $ 12 Rental $
2008— '09 $ <5> $ 5 $ 2 $ 12 Rental $
2009— '10 $ <5> $ 5 $ 2 $ 12 Rental $ ,
EVALUATION (for TAC use only)
Assumption Project:Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety, Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005 —2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
Spare
are Traffic Signal Electronics & Cabinet Number:
NAME:
PROJECT .
Department:
Public Works Department Priority: 6
•p sparetraffic signal electronics and cabinet to house the
1. Project
Description:
Purchase g
electronics.
Is this a rollover project? Noan List FY that it was previously funded in: N/A
y
2. Project Location(if applicable):
N/A
3. How does this projectimprove public andlor employee health, safety, and welfare?
Thisthe Town the abilityto keep a traffic signal operationalshould its
project provides
electronic components be damaged byor other accident At this time, the Town does
�
spare components to quicklyrepair a severely damaged traffic signal_
not have a complete set of p
4. How does this.project support stated communit goals?
Public safety is enhancedcomponents.
p due to ability traffic to quickly replace damaged trac signal
5. How does this project impact the Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
Purchase cost will be approximately $35,000; provides the ability to quickly install
A.
y
B '• . 2 •" • .0'1
• • .ii' . .. . • .• I• • - - •. 11.• - • r. � I.
6. What is the desired service level: N/A
How does this project have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A.
B.
roject impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town? .
7. How does this p p Town currentlyhas to replace or repair damage to electronic
ll as the
O&Mcosts
No impact to _ _
components as they occur. This project will accelerate the repair process.
p
8. projectD answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
N/this A
thiswith other project(s)to create significant savings of time, money, and
9. Is project coordinated p � ( )
convenience? Describe. (Report projected cost savings on the reverse
side.)
N/A
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$, 000)
Spare Traffic Signal Electronics & Cabinet
PROJECT NAME: Number:
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars) the total project cost,the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Carry Banked
Year Cost Funds Amount Source Amount Source Forward Funds
2005— `06$ 35 $ 35 $ $$ $
2006— `07$ $ $ $ $ $
2007— `08$ $ $ $ $ $
2008— `09$ $ $ $ $ $
2009— `10$ $ $ $ $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M)COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars) the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The "Total Cost" for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
Year Cost Personnel Other Amount Source a Amount Source
2005 — '06 $ <3> $ $ $ 3 Efficiency $
2006— '07 $ <3> $ $ $ 3 Efficiency $
2007— '08 $ <4> $ $ $ 4 Efficiency $
2008— '09 $ <4> $ $ $ 4 Efficiency $
2009— '10 $ <4> $ $ $ 4 Efficiency $
EVALUATION (for TAC use only)
Assumption Project:Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety, Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels _
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005 —2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
Pick-up truck replacement Number:
PROJECT NAME:
Public Works
Department: Department Priority: 7
Replace 1989 Ford F-350 Crew Cab Pick-up Truck(M-109)
1. Project Description.. p
Is this a rollover project? an No List FY that it was previously funded in: N/A
y
2. Project Location(if applicable):
N/A
this project improve public and/or employee health, safety, and welfare?
3. How does p
use ofwork employees' time as the new truck will be more reliable than
More efficient public j �'
the one it is replacing_
4. How does this project support stated community goats?
Replacement of a vehiclemiles;with more than 100, 0 the vehicle will also be over 10 years old
at t tune o -replacement.
5. How does this projectm impact the Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
p
t will be approximately $19,000; maintenance cost will be less than older truck
A. Purchase cos
B. jaintenace cost of the. existino truck will writ inue to increase
6. What is the desired service level:
N/A
How does this project have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A.
B.
How does this project jmpact.Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
7. p initially diminish as the new truck will require less maintenance and will be
will in
0 & Mcosty
available for work due to better reliability.
8.
D this project answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
N/
A
coordinated with other project(s)to create significant savings of time, money, and
9. Is this project
convenience? Describe. (Report projected cost savings on the reverse side.)
N/A
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$, 000)
PROJECT NAME: Pick-un truck replacement Number: _
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars)the total project cost,the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Carry Banked
Year Cost Funds Amount Source Amount Source Forward Funds
2005 — `06$19 $19 $ _ $ $ $
2006— `07$ $ $ $ .$ $
2007— `08$ $ ,$ $ $ $
2008— `09$ $ $ .$ $ $
2009— '10$ $ $ $ $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M)COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars) the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The "Total Cost"for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
Year Cost Personnel Other Amount Source _Amount Source
2005 —'06 $ <2> $ $ $ 2 Repair/mntc $
2006— '07 $ <0.7> $ $ $ 1 Repair/mntc $
2007— `08 $ <1.0> $ $ $ 1.5 Repair/mntc $
2008— '09 $ <0.7> $ $ $ 1 Repair/mntc $
2009— '10 $ <0.5> $ $ $ 1.5 Repair/mntc $
EVALUATION(for TAC use only)
Assumption Project: Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety, Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005 —2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
Utility pick-up truck replacement
PROJECT NAME: Number:
Department: Public Works Department Priority: 8
Replace 1995 Ford Service Truck used by the signing and striping crew.
1. Project Description:
e ruc curren ly has 99,000 miles on it and will be over 100,000 miles
prior to the start of the 2005-2006 fiscal year.
Is this a rollover project? No List any FY that it was previously funded in: N/A
2. Project Location(if applicable):
N/A
3. How does this project improve public and/or employee health, safety, and welfare?
More efficient use of public work employees' time as the new truck will be more reliable than
the one it is replacing.
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
Replacement of a vehicle with more than 100,000 miles;the vehicle will also be over 10 years old
at the time of replacement.
5. How does this project impact the Town's fiscal resources,A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
Purchase cost will be annroximately $19.000: maintenance cost will be less than older truck
A.
6. What is the desired service level:
N/A
How does this project have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A.
B.
7. How does this project impact.Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
will initially diminish as the new truck will require less maintenance and will be
O & Mcosty q
available for work due to better reliability.
8. D this project answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
QN/A
9. Is this project coordinated with other project(s)to create significant savings of time, money, and
convenience? Describe. (Report projected cost savings on the reverse side.)
N/A
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$,000)
Utility pick-up truck replacement
PROJECT NAME: Number:
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars) the total project cost,the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Carry Banked
Year Cost Funds Amount Source Amount Source Forward Funds
2005— `06$ 23 $ 23 $ $ $ $
2006—`07$ $ $ $ $ $
2007— `08$ $ $ $ $ $
2008— `09$ $ $ $ $ $
2009- 10$
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M)COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars) the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The "Total Cost"for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
Year Cost Personnel Other Amount Source Amount Source
2005— '06 $ <2> $ $ $ 2 Repair/mntc $
2006— '07 $ <0.7> $ $ $ 1 Repair/mntc $
2007— `08 $ <1.0> $ $ $ 1.5 Repair/mntc $
2008— '09 $ <0.7> $ $ $ 1 Repair/mntc $
2009— '10 $ <0.5> ,$ $ $ 1.5 Repair/mntc $
EVALUATION(for TAC use only)
Assumption Project: Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety, Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005—2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
Traffic Signal Radio Communication
PROJECT NAME: Number:
Department:artment: Public Works Department Priority: 9
Purchase radio communication equipment that will link 3 traffic signals
1. Project Description..
to the City of"l'ucson Traffic Management Center as well as locally. phis
system eliminates the need for three expensive telephone links.
Is this a rolloverpJ
ro'ect? No List any FY that it was previously funded in: N/A
2. Project L.ocatio (ifpplicabJe): the Town of Oro will e installed at 4 traffic signals owned by Valley
�lus project g
p J
3. How does thisJ
ro'ect improve public and/or employee health, safety, and welfare?
p
This
PJro•ecf provides the Town the ability to link 3 traffic signals to the City of Tucson Traffic
Management Center with long sayings over telephoir link_ The communication link
to the Management Center ensures rapid staff response to traffic signa malfunctions_
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
N/A
5. How does thisJro'ect impact the Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
p
Purchase cost will be approximately $20,000; eliminates the need for higher cost telephone
A. communication lines.
B 1
6. What is the desired service level: N/A
How does thisJro'ect have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
p
A.
B.
7. How does this project impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
After initial expense of the system the O&M costs will be reduced as there will be no monthly
e ep one ine charge. The radio system requires minimal maintenance.
8. D this project answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
QN/A
9. Is thisJ
ro'ect coordinated with other project(s)to create significant savings of time, money, and
P
convenience? Describe. (Report projected cost savings on the reverse side.)
N/A
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$, 000)
Traffic Signal Radio Communication
PROJECT NAME: Number:
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars) the total project cost,the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Carry Banked
Year Cost Funds Amount Source Amount Source Forward Funds
2005 — '06$ 20 $ 20 $ $ $ $
2006— `07$ $ $ $ $ $
2007— '08,$ ,$ $ $ $ $
2008— '09$ $ $ $ $ $
2009— '10$ $ $ $ $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars) the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The"Total Cost" for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings _ Projected Savings
Year Cost Personnel Other Amount Source Amount Source
2005 — `06 $ <.9> $ .1 $ $ 1 Phone line $
2006— `07 $ <1.2> $ .1 $ .2 $ 1.5 Phone line $
2007— `08 $ <1.5> $ .1 $ .1 $ 1.7 Phone line $
2008— '09 $ <1.3> $ .2 ,$ .2 $ 1.7 Phone line $
2009— `10 $ <1.6> $ .2 $ .2 $ 2.0 Phone line $ _
EVALUATION (for TAC use only)
Assumption Project:Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety, Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005 –2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
Traffic Signal Battery Backup System
PROJECT NAME: Number:
Department: Public Works
Department Priority: 10
Project Description:
Purchase 4 traffic signal battery backup systems. These systems ensure
1. p
operation of traffic signals due to power outages.
Is this a rollover project? No List any FY that it was previously funded in: N/A
2. Eroject Locatioxt if a li b e :
hisro ect wille i tae at 4 traffic signals owned bythe Town of Oro Valley. These
p Jg
would be for signals on Tangerine Road.
3. How does this project improve public and/or employee health, safety, and welfare?
This project provides power backup for traffic_signals during power outages. This is especially
critical during the Monsoon season when power outages often occur during the hours of
darkness making signalized intersections particularly dangerous_
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
Improved public safety
5. How does this project impact the Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
Purchase cost will be approximately $20,000; minimize the need for Police Officers having
A.
• • l-- • 'Y el 1' 9 i• •"- " 111 .•"
B. • • '• ' - • i - • - i• . ■i . se. i i '• h's • •• s.
6. What is the desired service level: N/A
How does this project have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A.
B.
7. How does this project impact Operation and Maintenance costs.for the Town?
1 expense of the system the O& M costs will be minimal, however there will be the
After lnitla p y
—1-16-eil to replace the batteries and maintain the back–up system.
8. DQes this rQ��ct answ r a threatening litigious sflation o .a legal Anand te?
Potenti� litigation accident� occurs when tram signal is Out down clue
to power outage.
9. Is this project coordinated with other project(s) to create significant savings of time, money, and
convenience? Describe. (Report projected cost savings on the reverse side.)
N/A
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$,000)
Traffic Signal Battery Backup System
PROJECT NAME: Number:
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars) the total project cost, the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Carry Banked
Year Cost Funds Amount Source Amount Source Forward Funds
2005— '06$ 20 $ 20 $ $ $ $
2006— `07$ $ $ $ $ $
2007— `08$ $ $ $ $ $
2008— `09$ $ $ $ $ $
2009— '10$4
$ $ $ $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars) the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The"Total Cost"for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings _ Projected Savings
Year Cost Personnel Other Amount Source Amount Source
2005 — '06 $ <.8> $ $ 0.2 $ 1 PD officer Time$
2006— '07 $ <.45> $ $ 0.75 $ 1.2 PD officer Time$
2007— '08 $ <.7> $ $ 0.5 $ 1.2 PD officer Time$
2008— `09 $ <1.1> $ $ 0.4 $ 1.5 PD officer Time$
2009— '10 $<1.25> $ $ 0.75 $ 2.0 PD officer Time,$
EVALUATION(for TAC use only)
Assumption Project: Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety, Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005 —2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
Traffic Signal LED Upgrade .
PROJECT NAME: Number:
Department: Public Works Department Priority: 11
p
1. Project Descri tion: Upgrade Lambert/La Canada intersection and Magee/Northern
J p
intersection signals with LED lamps.
Is this a rollover project? No List any FY that it was previously funded in: N/A
2. Project L/LatCon(ifapplicab1c):
Lanberta ana a ersection and Magee/Northern intersection signals.
3. How does this project improve public and/or employee health, safety, and welfare?
LED lamps are longer lasting and use less power_
4. How does this project support stated community goals?. .
Improve safety for the community as it will reduce the incidence of lamp outages.
5. How does this project impact the Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. Re-lamping cost will be approximately $25,000; reduce electric power costs; reduce
- . 1� - - . - - • es- • • ' •- • • . -- •
B
• •• . - is. - 1. • - • will remain constant
6. What is the desired service level: N/A
How does this project have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A.
B.
7. How does this project impact Operation and Maintenance costs.for the Town?
expense of the system the O&M costs will be minimal however there will be the
After initialp y ,
need to replace the LED lamps.
8. D this project answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
N/A
9. Is this project coordinated with other project(s)to create significant savings of time, money, and
convenience? Describe. (Report projected cost savings on the reverse side.)
N/A
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$, 000)
Traffic Signal LED Upgrade
PROJECT NAME: Number:,
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars) the total project cost, the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Carry Banked
Year Cost Funds Amount Source Amount Source Forward Funds
2005 — `46$ 25 $ 25 $ $ $ $
2006— `07$ $ $ $ $ $
2007— `08$ $ $ $ $ $
2008— '09.$ $ $ $ $ $
2009— '10$ $ $ $ $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M)COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars) the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The"Total Cost" for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
Year Cost Personnel Other Amount Source Amount Source
2005 — `06 $ <.2> $ $ $ .2 Power $
2006— `07 $ <.2> $ $ $ .2 Power $
2007— '08 $ <.3> $ $ $ .3 Power $
2008— `09 $ 0 $ $ .5 $ .5 Power $
2009— '10 $ <.6> $ $ $ .6 Power $
EVALUATION (for TAC use only)
Assumption Project: Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety, Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005 —2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
Pick-up truck replacement
PROJECT NAME: Number:
Department: Public Works Department Priority:
. Replace 1995 Ford F-250 4x4 Pick-up Truck(M-108)
1. Project Description.
Is this a rolloverJ
roject? No List any FY that it was previously funded in: N/A
p
2. Project Location(if applicable):
N/A
3. How does thisp roject improve public and/or employee health, safety, and welfare?
More efficient use of public work employees' time as the new truck will be more reliable than
the one it is replacing
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
Replacement of a vehicle with more than 100,000 miles;the vehicle will also be over 10 years old
at the time of replacement.
projectimpact How doesm
this ithe Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A.
Purchase cost will be approximately $19,000; maintenance cost will be less than older truck
B. LA a. - 'Il' ,, . • •ntinne to increase
N/A
6. What is the desired service level:
How does thispJ
roject have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A.
B.
7. How does this project impact.Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
ll initiall diminish as the new truck will re uire less maintenance and will be
O & Mcostwi yq
available for work due to better reliability.
8. D this project answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
N/A
9. Is thisJroject coordinated with other project(s)to create significant savings of time, money, and
p
convenience? Describe. (Report projected cost savings on the reverse side.)
N/A
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands-4, 000)
PROJECT NAME: Pick-un truck replacement Number: _
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars) the total project cost,the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Carry Banked
Year Cost Funds Amount Source Amount Source Forward Funds
2005 — `06$ $ $ $ ,$ $
2006— '07,$ 19 $ 19 $ $ $ $
2007—`08$ $ $ $ $ $
2008— `09$ $ $ ,$_ $ $
2009— '10$ $ $ $ $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M)COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars) the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The "Total Cost" for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings _ Projected Savings
Year Cost Personnel Other Amount Source Amount Source
2005 — `06 $ $ $ $ $
2006— '07 $ <1> $ $ $ 1 Repair/mntc $
2007— '08 $ <0.8> $ $0.3 $ 1.1 Repair/mntc $
2008— `09 $ <0.7> $ $0.5 $ 1.2 Repair/mntc $
2009— '10 $ <1.0> $ $0.3 $ 1.3 Repair/mntc _$
EVALUATION (for TAC use only)
Assumption Project:Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety, Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005—2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
Water Truck
PROJECT NAME: Number:
Department: Public Works Department Priority:
1. Pro'ect Descri tion: Purchase new 4000 gallon truck.
J p
Is this a rollover project? No List any FY that it was previously funded in: N/A
2. Project Location(if applicable):
N/A
3. How does this project improve public and/or employee health, safety, and welfare?
More efficient use of public work equipment and employees' time as the new tuck will b ave a
l arger cp aci ty,thus able to stay on the job longer with fewer breaks to refill with water This
will improve air quality when working in the right-of-way_
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
N/A
5. How does this project impact the Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
Purchase cost will be approximately $100,000; Larger water tank means fewer trips thus
A.
-.1.'0 1 1 i.
B. Fffieeiencv will he hamnered
6. What is the desired service level: N/A
How does this project have an effect on Town's service levels,A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A.
B.
7. How does this project impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
cost will increase as this truck will be an addition to the existingequipment fleet. Fewer
O &M
ps o accomplish the same job means that personnel can increase number of jobs done in a
day. Also improve fuel usage.
8. Doe this project answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
N/A
9. Is this project coordinated with other project(s)to create significant savings of time, money, and
convenience? Describe. (Report projected cost savings on the reverse side.)
N/A
r
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$, 000)
Water Truck
PROJECT NAME:
Number:
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars)the total project cost, the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Carry Banked
Year Cost Funds Amount Source Amount Source Forward Funds
2005 — `06$ $ $ $ .$ $
2006— `07$100 $100 $ _ $ _ $ $
2007— `08$ $ $ .$ .$ $
2008— `09$ $ $ $ $ $
2009— '10$ $ $ $ $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
Please list(in thousands of dollars) the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The"Total Cost"for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
ear Cost Personnel Other Amount Source _Amount_ Source
2005 — `06 $ c $ $ $ $
2006— '07 $ <10> $ 5 $ 2 $ 17 Rental $
2007— '08 $ <10> $ 5 -$ 2 +$ 17 Rental $
2008 — '09 $ <10> $ 6 $ 2.5 $ 17.5 Rental $
2009— '10 $ <10> $ 6 $ 2.5 $ 17.5 Rental $
EVALUATION(for TAC use only)
Assumption Project: Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety, Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005 —2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
Street Sweeper Number:
PROJECT NAME:
Department: Public Works Department Priority:
1. Pro'ect Descri tion: Replace 1993 Mobil Sweeper.
J p
Is this a rollover project? No List any FY that it was previously funded in: 2005/2006
2. Project Location(if applicable):
N/A
3. How does this project improve public and/or employee health, safety, and welfare?
More efficient use of public work employees' time as the new sweeper will be more reliable
than the one it is replacing, The existing sweeper requires maintenance on regular basis and is
often not available when needed_ Replacement will improve driver safety and air anality_
4. How does this project support stated community pals?
Ensure that all paved residential public streets m-Oro Valley are swept twice annually.
5. How does this project impact the Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A.
Purchase cost will be approximately $190,000; maintenance cost will be much less than for
the older sweeper.
'le , -- ,- •• ./1 11• - • 1 - 1 • 18..1 - 1. / 14 . 1 - 1. I • •/ / .
6. What is the desired service level: Sween streets twice annually
How does this project have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A- Ensures eauinment is available to meet the service level.
B. Less likely Town will meet the desired service level for all streets.
7. How does this project impact.Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
will initially diminish as new sweeper will require less maintenance and will be
O &Mcost y p q
available for work due to better reliability.
8. D this project answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
N/A
9. Is this project coordinated with other project(s)to create significant savings of time, money, and
convenience? Describe. (Report projected cost savings on the reverse side.)
N/A
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$, 000)
Street Sweeper
PROJECT NAME: Number:
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars) the total project cost, the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Carry Banked
Year Cost Funds Amount Source Amount Source Forward Funds
2005 — `06$ $ $ $ $ $
2006— `07$190 $190 $ $ $ $
2007— `08$ $ $ $ $ $
2008— '09,$ $ $ $ $ $
2009— `10$ $ $ $ $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars) the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The "Total Cost"for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
Year Cost Personnel Other Amount Source Amount Source
2005 — `06 $ $ $ $ $
2006— '07 $ <24> $ 5 $ 2 $ 31 Rental $
2007— `08 $ <24.5> $ 5 $ 2 $ 31.5 Rental $
2008— `09 $ <22.5> $ 6 $ 3 $ 31.5 Rental $
2009— '10 $ <23> $ 6 $ 3 $ 32 Rental $
EVALUATION(for TAC use only)
Assumption Project: Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety, Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005—2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
PROJECT NAME: Sun City (Del Webb and Sun City Blvd.) Number:
Department: Public Works :Department Priority:
y
1. Project Description: Milling/Overlay/Pavement Preservation
Is this a rollover project?N/A List any FY that it was previously funded in:
2. Project Location(if applicable):
Sun City(Dell Webb and Sun City Blvd.
3. How does this project improve public and/or employee health, safety, and welfare?
Prolong the life span of the pavement;restore the integrity of the street and neighborhood.
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
Preserve Town property
5. How does this project impact the Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. Design& construction cost to be borne by the Town(HURF)
B. Will cost four times in the future
6. What is the desired service level: Maintain
How does this project have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. Maintain existing level of service
B.
7. How does this project impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
Less maintenance cost because of new asphalt pavement
8. Does this project answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
N/A
9. Is this project coordinated with other project(s)to create significant savings of time, money, and
convenience? Describe. (Report projected cost savings on the reverse side.)
Sun City Pavement preservation
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands-4, 000)
PROJECT NAME: Sun City (Dell Web and Sun City Blvd.) Number:
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars) the total project cost,the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Carry Banked
Year Cost Funds Amount Source Amount Source Forward Funds
2005 — `06$ $ $ $ $ $
2006— `07$300 $300 $ $ $ $
2007— `08$300 $300 $ $ $ $
2008— '09,$300 $300 $ $ $ $
2009— '10$ $ $ $ $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars) the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The "Total Cost"for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
Year Cost Personnel Other Amount Source Amount Source
2005 — `06 $ $ $ $ $
2006— `07 $ $ $ $ $
2007— `08 $ $ $ $ $
2008— `09 $ $ $ $ $
2009— '10 $ $ $ $ $
EVALUATION(for TAC use only)
Assumption Project:Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety, Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005 —2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
PROJECT NAME: Copper Creek Number:
Department: Public Works Department Priority:
1. Project Description: Pavement preservation
Is this a rollover project? N/A List any FY that it was previously funded in:
2. Project Location(if applicable):
Copper Creek Subdivision
3. How does this project improve public and/or employee health, safety, and welfare?
Prolong the life span of the pavement: restore the integrity of the street and neighborhood
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
Preserve Town property
5. How does this project impact the Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. Design& construction cost to be borne by the Town (HURF)
B. Will cost four times in the future
6. What is the desired service level: Maintain level
How does this project have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. Maintain existing level of service
B. None
7. How does this project impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
Will reduce maintenance cost because of new pavement
8. Does this project answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
N/A
9. Is this project coordinated with other project(s)to create significant savings of time, money, and
convenience? Describe. (Report projected cost savings on the reverse side.)
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands-4, 000)
PROJECT NAME: Copper Creek Number:
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars) the total project cost,the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Carry Banked
Year Cost Funds Amount Source Amount Source Forward Funds
2005— `06$ $ $ $ $ $
2006— `07$200 $200 $ $ $ $
2007— `08$200 $200 $ $ $ $
2008— `09$200 $200 $ $ $ $
2009— `10$200 $200 $ $ $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars) the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The"Total Cost"for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
Year Cost Personnel Other Amount Source Amount Source
2005 — '06 $ $ $ $ $
2006— `07 $ $ $ $ $
2007— `08 $ $ $ $ $
2008— `09 $ $ $ $ $
2009— '10 $ $ $ $ $
EVALUATION(for TAC use only)
Assumption Project:Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety, Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005—2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
PROJECT NAME: Shadow Mountain Estates Number:
- 1
Department: Public Works Department Priority:
1. Project Description: Overlay/reconstruction/Pavement Preservation
Is this a rollover project?N/A List any FY that it was previously funded in:
2. Project Location(if applicable):
Shadow Mountain Estates (Oracle/Calle Concordia/Calle Buena Vista/Hardy)
3. How does this project improve public and/or employee health, safety, and welfare?
Prolong the life span of the pavement; restore the integrity of the street and neighborhood.
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
Preserve Town property
5. How does this project impact the Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. Design& construction cost to be borne by the Town(HURF)
B. Will cost four times in the future
6. What is the desired service level: Maintain
How does this project have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. Maintain existing level of service
B.
7. How does this project impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
Less maintenance cost because of new asphalt pavement
8. Does this project answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
N/A
9. Is this project coordinated with other project(s)to create significant savings of time, money, and
convenience? Describe. (Report projected cost savings on the reverse side.)
N/A
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$, 000)
PROJECT NAME: Shadow Mountain Estates Number: _
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars) the total project cost,the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Carry Banked
Year Cost Funds Amount Source _ Amount Source Forward Funds
2005 — '06$ $ _$ _ S $ $
2006— `07$350 $350 $ $ $ $
2007— '08,$ $ $ $ _ $ $
2008— `09$ $ $ _ $ _ $ $
2009— '10$ $ $ $ $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars) the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The"Total Cost"for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
Year Cost Personnel Other Amount Source _Amount Source
2005 — `06 $ $ $ $ $
2006— `07 $ $ $ $ $
2007— `08 $ $ $ ,$ $
2008— `09 $ $ $ $ .$
2009— '10 $ $ $ $ $
EVALUATION(for TAC use only)
Assumption Project:Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety, Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005—2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
PROJECT NAME: Shadow Mountain Estates East Number:
Department: Public Works Department Priority:
1. Project Description: Overlay/reconstruction/Pavement Preservation
Is this a rollover project?N/A List any FY that it was previously funded in:
2. Project Location(if applicable):
Hardy Road /Oracle/ South and west current Town Limits
3. How does this project improve public and/or employee health, safety, and welfare?
Prolong the life span of the pavement; restore the integrity of the street and neighborhood.
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
Preserve Town property
5. How does this project impact the Town's fiscal resources,A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. Design& construction cost to be borne by the Town(HLIRF)
B. Will cost four times in the future
6. What is the desired service level: Maintain
How does this project have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. Maintain existing level of service
B.
7. How does this project impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
Less maintenance cost because of new asphalt pavement
8. Does this project answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
N/A - ---- -
9. Is this project coordinated with other project(s)to create significant savings of time, money, and
convenience? Describe. (Report projected cost savings on the reverse side.)
N/A --
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$, 000)
PROJECT NAME: Shadow Mountain Estates East Number:
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars) the total project cost, the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Carry Banked
Year Cost Funds Amount Source Amount Source Forward Funds
2005— `06$ $ $ $ $ $
2006— `07$250 $250 $ $ $ $
2007— `08$ $ $ $ $ $
2008— `09$ $ $ $ $ $
2009— `10$ $ $ $ $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars) the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The"Total Cost"for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
Year Cost Personnel Other Amount Source Amount Source
2005— `06 $ $ $ $ $
2006— `07 $ $ $ $ $
2007— `08 $ $ $ $ $
2008— `09 $ $ $ $ $
2009— '10 $ $ $ $ $
EVALUATION(for TAC use only)
Assumption Project:Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety, Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005—2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
PROJECT NAME: Oro Valley Operating Center Number:
Department: DPW, OVWU, P&R Department Priority:
1. Project Description: Operation center for Town's operation and administration personnel
Is this a rollover project?N/A List any FY that it was previously funded in:
2. Project Location(if applicable):
Site to be determined
3. How does this project improve public and/or employee health, safety, and welfare?
Existing site at 680 W Calle Concordia is already max out. Town promised neighbor that the
operation at Calle Concordia (more than twenty years) is temporary
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
Provide a safe working environment
5. How does this project impact the Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. Design funds
B. Land will be more expensive in the future
6. What is the desired service level: Increase Level
How does this project have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. Increase level
B. Level of service decreases each year
7. How does this project impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
See 0 & M table
8. Does this project answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
N/A
9. Is this project coordinated with other project(s)to create significant savings of time, money, and
convenience? Describe. (Report projected cost savings on the reverse side.)
OVWU & P&R
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$,000)
PROJECT NAME: Oro Valley Operating Center Number:
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars)the total project cost, the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Carry Banked
Year Cost Funds Amount Source Amount Source Forward Funds
2005— `06$ $ $ $ $ $
2006— `07$600 $600 $ $ $ $
2007— `08$ $ $ $ $ $
2008— `09$ $ $ $ $ $
2009— 'l0$ $ $ $ $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars) the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The "Total Cost"for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
Year Cost Personnel Other Amount Source Amount Source
2005 — `06 $ $ $ $ $
2006— `07 $ $ $ $ $
2007— `08 $ $ $ $ $
2008— `09 $
2009— '10 $ $ $ $ $
EVALUATION(for TAC use only)
Assumption Project: Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety, Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005 —2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
PROJECT NAME: La Cholla: Naranja to Glover Number:
Department:. Public Works Department Priority:
1. Project Description: Pedestrian and Bike separated path
Is this a rollover project? No List any FY that it was previously funded in:
2. Project Location(if applicable):
La Cholla: from Naranja to Glover
3. How does this project improve public and/or employee health, safety, and welfare?
Provide a separated path for pedestrian and bikes
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
Improve public safety
5. How does this project impact the Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A.CIP request for FY 03/04
B.
6. What is the desired service level:
How does this project have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. Improve safety
B. Not in compliance with Town Council policy of implementing Ped and Bike plan
7. How does this project impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
See O & M table
8. Does this project answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
N/A
9. Is this project coordinated with other project(s) to create significant savings of time, money, and
convenience? Describe. (Report projected cost savings on the reverse side.)
None
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$, 000)
PROJECT NAME: La Cholla: Naranja to Glover Number:
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars)the total project cost, the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Carry Banked
Year Cost Funds Amount Source Amount Source Forward Funds
2005— `06$ $ $ $ $ $
2006— `07$150 $150 $ $ $ $
2007— '08$ $ $ $ $ $
2008— `09$ $ $ $ $ $
2009— '10$ $ $ $ $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M)COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars) the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The"Total Cost"for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
Year Cost Personnel Other Amount Source Amount Source
2005 — `06 $ •
$ $ $ $
2006— `07 $ $ $ $ $
2007— `08 $ $ $ $ $
2008— `09 $ $ $ $ $
2009— '10 $ ,$ $
EVALUATION(for TAC use only)
Assumption Project: Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety, Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005—2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
PROJECT NAME: Calle Buena Vista Number:
Department: Public Works Department Priority:
1. Project Description: Add six feet paved shoulders for bike and pedestrian, fix drainage
Is this a rollover project?N/A List any FY that it was previously funded in:
2. Project Location(if applicable):
Calle Buena Vista: Calle Concordia to Linda Vista
3. How does this project improve public and/or employee health, safety, and welfare?
Provide a safe movement of pedestrian and vehicles
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
Encourage CDO high school students to bike or walk to school rather than drive _
5. How does this project impact the Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. Towns 01/02 CIP for design and 02/03 for construction
B.None
6. What is the desired service level: Increase level of service
How does this project have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. Increase
B. Remain the same
7. How does this project impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
See 0 & Mtable
8. Does thisJro'ect answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
p
N/A
9. Is this project coordinated with other project(s)to create significant savings of time, money, and
convenience? Describe. (Report projected cost savings on the reverse side.)
Calle Concordia safet im.rovements
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$, 000)
PROJECT NAME: Calle Buena Vista Number: _
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars)the total project cost,the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Carry Banked
Year Cost Funds Amount Source Amount Source Forward Funds
2005— `06$ $ $ $ $ $
2006— '07$ $ $ $ $ $
2007— `08$300 $300 $ $ $ $
2008— `09$ $ $ $ $ $
2009—`10$ $ $ $ $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars)the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The"Total Cost"for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
Year Cost Personnel Other Amount Source Amount Source
2005 — `06 $ $ $ $ $
2006— `07 $ $ $ $ $
2007— `08 $ $ $ $ $
2008— `09 $ $ $ $ $
2009— 'l0 $ $ $ $ $
EVALUATION(for TAC use only)
Assumption Project:Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety, Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005—2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
PROJECT NAME: Oro Valley Estates Number:
Department: Public Works Department Priority:
1. Project Description: Pavement Preservation/Reconstruction/Drainage
Is this a rollover project?N/A List any FY that it was previously funded in:
2. Project Location(if applicable):
Oro Valley Estates
3. How does this project improve public and/or employee health, safety, and welfare?
Prolong the life span of the pavement; restore the integrity of the street and neighborhoods.
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
Preserve Town property
5. How does this project impact the Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. Design& construction cost to be borne by the Town(HURF),project was in Towns 02/03 &
03/04 CIP
B. Will cost four times in the future
6. What is the desired service level: Maintain
How does this project have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. Maintain existing level of service
B.
7. How does this project impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
Less maintenance cost because of new asphalt pavement
8. Does this project answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
N/A
9. Is this project coordinated with other project(s) to create significant savings of time, money, and
convenience? Describe. (Report projected cost savings on the reverse side.)
Water Utility for water line up grade
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$,000)
PROJECT NAME: Oro Valley Estates Number: _
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars) the total project cost,the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Carry Banked
Year Cost Funds Amount Source Amount Source Forward Funds
2005— `06$ $ $ $ $ $
2006— `07$400 $400 $ $ $ $
200 — 'os$AOO $,A00 $ $ $ $
2008— `09$ $ $ $ $ $
2009— `10$ $ $ $ $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars) the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The"Total Cost"for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
Year Cost Personnel Other Amount Source Amount Source
2005— `06 $ $ $ $ $
2006— `07 $ $ $ $ $
2007— `08 $ $ $ $ $
2008— `09 $ $ $ $ $
2009— '10 $ $ $ $ $
EVALUATION(for TAC use only)
Assumption Project: Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety, Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005 —2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
PROJECT NAME: Bridge Repair Number:
Department: Public Works :Department Priority:
Y
1. Project Description: Repair of bridges
Is this a rollover project?N/A List any FY that it was previously funded in:
2. Project Location(if applicable):
Town wide
3. How does this project improve public and/or employee health, safety, and welfare?
Provide a safe transportation system.
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
Preserve Town property
5. How does this project impact the Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. Was in Town's 00/01, 01/02 CIP, Bank $100,00 per year until the bridge repair account has
$500,00
B. When time comes to repair any bridges the cost to do so will drain the CIP funds at that particular
year, so it's good practice to bank funds for those type of repairs
6. What is the desired service level: Maintain
How does this project have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. Maintain existing level of service
B. Decrease existing level of service
7. How does this project impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
See 0 & M table
8. Does this project answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
N/A
9. Is this project coordinated with other project(s) to create significant savings of time, money, and
convenience? Describe. (Report projected cost savings on the reverse side.)
N/A
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$, 000)
PROJECT NAME: Bridge Repair Number:
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars)the total project cost, the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Carry Banked
Year Cost Funds Amount Source Amount Source Forward Funds
2005 — `06,$ $ $ $ $ $
2006— `07$100 $100 $ $ $ $
2007— `08$100 $100 $ $ $ $
2008— `09$100 $100 $ $ $ $
2009— '10$100 $100 $ $ $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars) the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The"Total Cost" for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
Year Cost Personnel Other Amount Source Amount Source
2005 — `06 $ $ $ $ $
2006— `07 $ $ $ $ $
2007— `08 $ $ $ $ $
2008 — `09 $ $ $ $ $
2009— `10 $ $ $ $ $
EVALUATION(for TAC use only)
Assumption Project: Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety, Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005—2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
PROJECT NAME: Rancho Vistoso Blvd. (Big Wash to Tangerine Road) Number:
Department: Public Works Department Priority:
1. Project Description: Pavement Preservation
Is this a rollover project?N/A List any FY that it was previously funded in:
2. Project Location(if applicable):
Rancho Vistoso Blvd. ( Big Wash to Tangerine Road)
3. How does this project improve public and/or employee health, safety, and welfare?
Prolong the life span of the pavement; restore the integrity of the street and neighborhood.
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
Preserve Town property
5. How does this project impact the Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. Design& construction cost to be borne by the Town(RUBE)
B. Will cost four times in the future
6. What is the desired service level: Maintain
How does this project have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. Maintain existing level of service
B.
7. How does this project impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
Less maintenance cost because of new asphalt pavement
8. Does this project answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
N/A
9. Is this project coordinated with other project(s) to create significant savings of time, money, and
convenience? Describe. (Report projected cost savings on the reverse side.)
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$, 000)
PROJECT NAME: Rancho Vistoso Blvd. (Big Wash to Tangerine Road) Number:
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars) the total project cost, the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Carry Banked
Year Cost Funds Amount Source Amount Source Forward Funds
2005— `06$ $ $ $ $ $
2006— `07$200 $200 $ $ $ $
2007— `08$200 $200 $ $ $ $
2008— `09$1200 $200 $1000 STPX $ $ $
(PAG)
2009— `10$200 $200 $ $ $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M)COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars) the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The "Total Cost"for each year
• is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
Year Cost Personnel Other Amount Source Amount Source
2005 — `06 $ $
2006— `07 $
2007— `08 $ $ $ $ $
2008— `09 $ $ $ $ $
2009— '10 $ $ $ $ $
EVALUATION(for TAC use only)
Assumption Project: Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety, Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005 —2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
Dump Truck
PROJECT NAME: Number:
Department: Public Works Department Priority:
1. Project Descri tion: Replace 1987 International dump truck.
J p
Is this a rollover project? No List any FY that it was previously funded in: 2007/2008
2. Project Location(if applicable):
N/A
3. How does this project improve public and/or employee health, safety, and welfare?
More efficient use of public work employees' time as the new tuck will be more reliable than
the one it is replacing. The new truck will have a larger dump box Replacement will improve
ability to respond to public needs in the road ri -of-way.
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
N/A
5. How does this project impact the Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. Purchase cost will be approximately $55,000; maintenance cost will be much less than for
B. maintenance cost will increase and effieciencv will dirnninish
6. What is the desired service level: N/A
How does this project have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A.
B.
7. How does this project impact.Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
M cost will initially diminish as new truck will require less maintenance and will be
O & y q
available for work due to better reliability. Fewer trips to accomplish the same job means that
personnel can increase number of jobs done in a day. Also improve fuel usage.
8. D this project answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
QN/A
9. Is this project coordinated with other project(s)to create significant savings of time, money, and
convenience? Describe. (Report projected cost savings on the reverse side.)
N/A
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$, 000)
Dump Truck
PROJECT NAME: Number:
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars) the total project cost, the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Carry Banked
Year Cost Funds Amount Source Amount Source Forward Funds
2005 — `06$ $ $ $ $ $
2006— `07$ $ $ $ $ $
2007— `08$ 80 $ 80 $ $ $ $
2008— `09$ $ $ $ $ $
2009— 10$ $ $ $ $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M)COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars)the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The"Total Cost"for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
Year Cost Personnel Other Amount Source Amount Source
2005 — `06 $ $ $ $ $
2006— `07 $ $ $ $ $
2007— '08 $ 3.5 $ 4 $ 1 $ 1.5 Efficiency $
2008— '09 $ 3 $ 4 $ 1 $ 2 Efficiency $
2009— '10 $ 3 $ 4 $ 1 $ 2 Efficiency $
EVALUATION (for TAC use only)
Assumption Project:Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety, Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005 —2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
Self Propelled Curb Machine
PROJECT NAME: Number:
Department: Public Works Department Priority:
1. Project Descri tion: Purchase new self-propelled curb machine.
J P
Is this a rollover project? No List any FY that it was previously funded in: N/A
2. Project Location(if applicable):
N/A
3. How does this project improve public and/or employee health, safety, and welfare?
Provides the Town the ability to install curbing in numerous locations throughout the Town
where curbing is warranted to control drainage. The ability to do this work will relieve some
property owners of the nuisance of drainage and erosion on their property
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
N/A
5. How does this project impact the Town's fiscal resources,A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. Purchase cost will be approximately $26,000; provides the ability to install curbing using in
• •• • - • i-" • ' • ••0' • ' '-111 -• • • . • . .1 . • 1 'if" •.
B
• ISO • , t • - - • •- . -• • /- • 1 . • • • . . • - , t• - • • t
6. What is the desired service level: N/A
How does this project have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A.
B.
7. How does this project impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town? -
0 & M cost will increase as this equipment will be an addition to the existing equipment ment fleet.
g q p
n e ong erm, co for installation of short runs of curbing will be reduced and the speed of
installation will be greatly enhanced.
8. D this project answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
N/A
9. Is this project coordinated with other project(s)to create significant savings of time, money, and
convenience? Describe. (Report projected cost savings on the reverse side.)
N/A
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$, 000)
Self Propelled Curb Machine
PROJECT NAME: Number:
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars) the total project cost, the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Carry Banked
Year Cost Funds Amount Source Amount Source Forward Funds
2005 — `06$ $ $ $ $ $
2006— `07$ $ $ $ $ $
2007— `08$ 26 $ 26 $ $ $ $
2008— `09$ $ $ $ $ $
2009— '10$ $ $ $ $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars) the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The "Total Cost" for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
Year Cost Personnel Other Amount Source Amount Source
2005 — `06 $ o $ $ $ $
2006— '07 $ o $ $ ,$ $
2007— '08 $ <3> $ 6 $ 1 $ 10 Contractor $
2008— '09 $ <3> $ 6 $ 1 $ 10 Contractor $
2009— '10 $ <3> $ 6 $ 1 $ 10 Contractor $
EVALUATION(for TAC use only)
Assumption Project: Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety, Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
• PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005—2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
Traffic Signal Maintenance Lift Truck
PROJECT NAME: Number:
Department: Public Works Department Priority:
1. Project Descri tion: Purchase a lift truck for traffic signal maintenance. Can potentially be
p
used for streetlight maintenance and other maintenance where lift
capability is required.
Is this a rollover project? No List any FY that it was previously funded in: N/A
2. Project Location(if applicable):
3. How does this project improve public and/or employee health, safety, and welfare?
Town staff will he able to respond more rapidly to maintain signals especially when lamps need
to be replaced Less reliance on contractor assistance___
4. How does this project support stated community goals?
N/A
5. How does this project impact the Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
Purchase cost for the lift will be approximately $75,000; reduce contractor cost;new
A.equipment in the fleet will require O&M cost.
B. '
. •. . .- .- �. - � - . � . � tactor serves_
6. What is the desired service level: N/A
How does this project have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A.
B.
7. How does this project impact Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town?
After initial expense of the system the O& M costs will be equivalent to other pieces of
p y q
equipmen in the fleet. Cost for maintenance of signals will decrease using in house personnel
and equipment.
8. D this project answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
N/A
9. Is this project coordinated with other project(s)to create significant savings of time, money, and
convenience? Describe. (Report projected cost savings on the reverse side.)
N/A
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$, 000)
Traffic Signal Maintenance Lift Truck
PROJECT NAME: Number:
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars) the total project cost,the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Carry Banked
Year Cost Funds Amount Source Amount Source Forward Funds
2005 — '06$ $ $ $ $ $
2006— '07,$ $ $ $ $ $
2007— `08$ $ $ $ $ $
2008 — `09$ 75 $ 75 $ $ $ $
2009— '10$ $ $ $ $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars) the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The"Total Cost" for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
Year Cost Personnel Other Amount Source Amount Source
2005 —`06 $ $ $ $ $
2006— `07 $ $ $ $ $
2007— `08 $ $ $ $ $
2008— '09 $ <.5> $ 1 $ .5 $ 2 Contract/Rent $
2009— '10 $ <.5> $ 1 $ 1 $ 2.5 Contract/Rent $
EVALUATION (for TAC use only)
Assumption Project: Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety, Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels
PROJECT SHEET
FY 2005—2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
Regenerative Air or Vacuum Sweeper
PROJECT NAME: Number:
Department: Public Works
p Department Priority:
1. Project Descrip tion: Replace or supplement 2002 Tenant Sweeper.
J
Is this a rollover project? No List any FY that it was previously funded in: 2007/2008
2. Project Location(if applicable):
N/A
3. How does this project improve public and/or employee health, safety, and welfare?
More efficient use of public work employees' time as the new sweeper will be more reliable
than the one it is replacing. Will improve ability to respond to sweeping as new area is annexed
into the Town_
4. How does this project sup ort,stated community goals?
Ensure that all paved residential public streets in-Oro Valley are swept twice annually.
5. How does this project impact the Town's fiscal resources, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A.
Purchase cost will be approximately $200,000; maintenance cost will be much less than for
the older sweeper.
B. Pxistinm sweeper clown more o len for maintenance Maintenance cost will increase
6. What is the desired service level: Sween streets twice annually
How does this project have an effect on Town's service levels, A.) if funded B.) if not funded?
A. Ensures eauinment is available to meet the service level.
B. Less likely Town will meet the desired service level for all streets.
7. How does this project impact.Operation and Maintenance costs for the Town? .
cost will initially diminish as new sweeper will require less maintenance and will be
O &M y p q
---available for work due to better reliability.
8. DQes this project answer a threatening litigious situation or a legal mandate?
9. Is this project coordinated with other project(s) to create significant savings of time, money, and
convenience? Describe. (Report projected cost savings on the reverse side.)
N/A
PROJECT BUDGET
(All Costs in Thousands--$, 000)
Regenerative Air or Vacuum Sweeper
PROJECT NAME: Number:
CAPITAL COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars)the total project cost, the capital funds requested from the Town, all
probable outside funding sources that could defray the Town's costs, funds carried forward from
previous years, and funds that were banked in previous years in anticipation of the project.
Fiscal Total Town Outside Funds Outside Funds Carry Banked
Year Cost Funds Amount Source Amount Source Forward Funds
2005 — `06$ $ $ $ $ $
2006— `07$ $ $ $ $ $
2007— `08$ $ $ $ $ $
2008— `09$ $ $ $ $ $
2009— 'l0$200 $200 $ $ $ $
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
Please list (in thousands of dollars) the total operating and maintenance costs including additional
personnel, leases, and so on associated with this project. List cost savings and the source of the savings
(efficiency improvements, deferred costs, etc.) in the Savings columns. The "Total Cost"for each year
is the costs minus the projected savings.
Fiscal Total Costs Projected Savings Projected Savings
Year Cost Personnel Other Amount Source Amount Source
2005 — `06 $ o $ $ $ $
2006— `07 $ o $ $ $ $
2007— `08 $ 4 - $ $ $ $
2008— `09 $ o $ $ $ $
2009— '10 $ <42> $ 10 $ 2 $ 4 Repair/mntc $ 50 Rental
EVALUATION(for TAC use only)
Assumption Project: Yes No
Score Criterion Score Criterion
Health, Safety, Welfare Impact on Operation and Maintenance
Supports Stated Community Goals Legal Ramifications
Fiscal Impact Relationship to Other Projects/Coordination
Impact on Service Levels