Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPackets - Council Packets (1201) AGENDA
ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL
REGULAR SESSION
JANUARY 21, 2004
ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE
REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 7:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS —TOWN MANAGER
The Mayor and Council may consider and/or take action on the items listed
below:
ORDER OF BUSINESS: MAYOR WILL REVIEW THE ORDER OF THE
MEETING
CALL TO AUDIENCE — At this time, any member of the public is allowed to
address the Mayor and Town Council on any issue not listed on today's
agenda. Pursuant to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, individual Council
Members may ask Town Staff to review the matter, ask that the matter be placed
on a future agenda, or respond to criticism made by speakers. However, the
Mayor and Council may not discuss or take legal action on matters raised during
"Call to Audience." In order to speak during "Call to Audience" please specify
what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card.
1. CONSENT AGENDA
(Consideration and/or possible action)
A. Minutes — 01/05/04; 01/07/04; 01/12/04
B. Building Safety Activity Report— December 2003
C. Coyote Run Monthly Activity Report— December 2003
D. Police Report— December 2003
E. Establishment of a new CIP Designer Position in the Department of
Public Works and provide additional funding for the CIP Designer
position
F. Report on Status of Emergency Drilling of Well E-7A
G. Resolution No. (R)04-03 Supplementing the revised Town Council
Parliamentary Rules & Procedures and Code of Conduct of the Oro
Valley Town Council by adding "Appendix B —Amended," referencing
the clarification of the appointment process of Town of Oro Valley
volunteers to Boards, Commissions, Committees, Advisory Boards,
and Task Forces
H. Resolution No. (R)04-04 Accepting the amended Compensation and
Benefits Study, and approving the use of the new Classification Plan
01/21/04 Agenda, Council Regular Session 2
and Pay Adjustments to the new salary range minimums, effective
January 1, 2004
I. Resolution No. (R)04-05 Approving an amendment to the Town of
Oro Valley 2003-2004 General Fund Budget authorizing an interest
free $64,000 Inter-Fund Loan to the Storm Water Utility Fund to
implement the Town of Oro Valley Storm Water Management Program
2. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. (0)04-01 EXTENDING AND
INCREASING THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE TOWN OF ORO
VALLEY, ARIZONA, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF TITLE 9,
CHAPTER 4, ARTICLE 7, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES AND
AMENDMENTS THERETO, BY ANNEXING THERETO CERTAIN
TERRITORY CONTIGUOUS TO THE EXISTING TOWN LIMITS OF THE
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA— NORTHERN AVENUE RIGHT-OF-
WAY BETWEEN HARDY ROAD ON THE NORTH AND CAMINO
CORTARO ON THE SOUTH
Explanation: The adoption of this ordinance will annex that portion of the
Northern Avenue right-of-way between Hardy Road on the north and
Camino Cortaro on the south.
3. PUBLIC HEARING — ORDINANCE NO. (0)04-02 RELATING TO
SPEED LIMITS; AMENDING ORO VALLEY TOWN CODE SECTION 11-
3-4, "SPEED LIMITS" REPEALING ALL RESOLUTIONS, ORDINANCES,
AND RULES OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY IN CONFLICT
THEREWITH; PRESERVING THE RIGHTS AND DUTIES THAT HAVE
ALREADY MATURED AND PROCEEDINGS THAT HAVE ALREADY
BEGUN THEREUNDER
Explanation: The adoption of this ordinance will designate a 35 mile per
hour speed limit for Innovation Park Drive between Rancho Vistoso
Boulevard and Tangerine Road.
4. PUBLIC HEARING — ORDINANCE NO. (0)04-03 APPROVAL OF A
ZONING AMENDMENT FOR A 76.5 ACRE PORTION OF A 79.5 ACRE
PARCEL, CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM MIXED
USE (COMMERCIAL, MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND LOW-
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND
CREATING NEW DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR THIS SUB-AREA
OF THE ROONEY RANCH PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT
Explanation: OV9-03-03 Mr. Blake Hastings, representing CDO
Partners, seeks to remove 76.5 acres of land from the Rooney Ranch
PAD Area A and designate this land as a new "Area Z" which would have
new permitted uses and development standards. This Area Z proposal is
accompanied by a tentative development plan that proposes a subdivision
of single-family detached homes on 152 lots.
01/21/04 Agenda, Council Regular Session 3
5. PUBLIC HEARING — ORDINANCE NO. (0)04-04 AMENDING THE
LAND USE MAP OF THE GENERAL PLAN BY CHANGING THE LAND
USE DESIGNATION OF THREE PARCELS, TOTALING 8.35 ACRES OF
LAND, FROM "CP", COMMERCE PARK TO "MHDR", MEDIUM HIGH
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, FOR PARCEL NUMBERS 22433007A,
22433008A AND 22433011A LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF DESERT SKY ROAD AND VALLE DEL ORO ROAD
Explanation: Mark Castro of Tierra Right of Way Services, representing
the owner, DC Investments, requests an amendment to the General Plan
map. The applicant seeks a General Plan amendment to facilitate a
rezoning of the property to allow construction of 50 to 65 single-family
detached homes on lots of 40 feet by 90 feet dimensions.
6. OV12-03-12 REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT PLAN
TO CONSTRUCT A 16,000 SQUARE FOOT CHURCH OF JESUS
CHRIST LATTER-DAY SAINTS, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF ARROWSMITH DRIVE AND WOODBURNE AVENUE,
PARCEL #21953004E
Explanation: Swaim Associates, representing the Church of Jesus Christ
Latter-Day Saints, requests approval of a development plan for a church
facility. The project is located on a 4.47 acre site with existing zoning of
PAD and Rancho Vistoso land use designation of medium high density
residential. Under the Rancho Vistoso PAD, churches are a permitted use
in this land use classification. The church building is 16,000 square feet,
containing the sanctuary, multi-purpose room, classrooms and office
space.
TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT
COUNCIL REPORTS
DEPARTMENT REPORTS
CALL TO AUDIENCE — At this time, any member of the public is allowed to
address the Mayor and Town Council on any issue not listed on today's
agenda. Pursuant to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, individual Council
Members may ask Town Staff to review the matter, ask that the matter be placed
on a future agenda, or respond to criticism made by speakers. However, the
Mayor and Council may not discuss or take legal action on matters raised during
"Call to Audience." In order to speak during "Call to Audience" please specify
what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card.
ADJOURNMENT
POSTED: 01/14/04
4:30 p.m.
lh
01/21/04 Agenda, Council Regular Session 4
A packet of agenda materials as listed above is available for public inspection at
least 24 hours prior to the Council meeting in the office of the Town Clerk
between the hours of 8:00 a.m. — 5:00p.m.
The Town of Oro Valley complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
If any person with a disability needs any type of accommodation, please notify
Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk at 229-4700.
INSTRUCTIONS TO SPEAKERS
Members of the public have the right to speak during any posted public
hearing. However, those items not listed as a public hearing are for
consideration and action by the Town Council during the course of their
business meeting. Members of the public may be allowed to speak on
these topics at the discretion of the Chair.
If you wish to address the Town Council on any item(s) on this agenda, please
complete a speaker card located on the Agenda table at the back of the room
and give it to the Town Clerk. Please indicate on the speaker card which item
number and topic you wish to speak on, or if you wish to speak during
"Call to Audience", please specify what you wish to discuss when
completing the blue speaker card.
Please step forward to the podium when the Mayor announces the item(s) on the
agenda which you are interested in addressing.
1. Please state your name and address for the record.
2. Speak only on the issue currently being discussed by Council. Please
organize your speech, you will only be allowed to address the Council
once regarding the topic being discussed.
3. Please limit your comments to 3 minutes.
4. During "Call to Audience" you may address the Council on any issue you
wish.
5. Any member of the public speaking must speak in a courteous and
respectful manner to those present.
Thank you for your cooperation.
A
MINUTES
ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL
JANUARY 5, 2003
ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS
11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE
STUDY SESSION—AT OR AFTER 4:30 PM
CALL TO ORDER—4:32 P.M.
PRESENT: Paul Loomis, Mayor
Werner Wolff, Vice Mayor
Paula Abbott, Council Member ,`�,;
!!:y':fRffF!'�'r+�
Dick Johnson, Council Member leBart Rochman Council Member
4:e;i:,/ '4p%,
,,?4,,?„.,,,.
rn!ri
";N I MMUNITY
PRESENTATION BY DA RAUSCHER AND DI!" JSSION F ��••
` v,J�
FACILITIES DISTRICTS CFDS /DISCUSSIOGB•P• MAGE1r .C.
(ORACLE CROSSINGS RETAIL CENTER) Y.:
E"�`�%ANO �.y DEVELOPMENT
�'��`fl i'ili ii. :��r
AGREEMENT ! .o
! lid;. !!i
fir•. .���, � /_..
,Ji• l
St.
John Moore, Managing Director with R f Dain Rausc ,' :. ''ue the following overview
of Community Facilities District Finan : ty�F,-,v,hi /•s'
1,;::::-‘,„,,
yfii`/•fl f�i. !..•:J;i}rinJ ti'af� ,i'
'i ,,.:$.: 'rC :;
Enabling Legislation for Community F i ► •t istrct`.
s
• • 48 en •f.;; `in 1988 and amended in 1991.
Arizona Revised Stat �r�`. �����"`r`�•
. . n `1'.N h` ration ' rr FDs•
• Provides for form ":.
• Florida Texas .R` Ne ,{! �,7.•c Caornia amongothers, have similar
legislation. : -/"` r f .�:{:��r!!
g .*. 1
Community Fac • is Q'',,,,
• Vehicl 44° ,,�• ,ubwith tax-exempt bonds.
i�;�/l�o .n.•8;y. kft.,#pstructure
fi;;�����; •rW �'%".. v
• Cit �. y n counc"� q. as strict Board (if District is less than 600 acres).
• Forr -': , I requires-JOIN of landowners, or an election.
'µ: • / "ithin city/town corporate limits.
•
• Can on s����¢ orm s� •
• Limited b' ogn lie within the District, credit worthiness of
landowner/d-*cooper/homebuilder and likely build-out of project.
• Public purpose projects only—project must ultimately be dedicated to
governmental entity.
• Ability to issue three types of debt:
✓ General obligation bonds
✓ Assessment bonds
✓ Revenue bonds
• Once the city/town council forms the CFD, landowners or voters vote on CFD
Bond Authorization.
• Any Bond issuance must be approved by the CFD Board (city/town council) after
a public hearing process.
• Once formed, the CFD has the power of a political subdivision.
01/05/04 Minutes,Council Study Session 2
Development Impact Fees
• Arizona law does not allow an impact fee to be charged for facilities financed
with a CFD.
• Credit for impact fees are given for CFD-financed projects.
Trend for CFD Use in Arizona
• 1989-1997: $92 million in 16 transactions
• 1998-2003: $164 million in 22 transactions
• 1989-1997: 9 Districts Formed
• 1998-2003: 14 Districts Formed
Community Facilities Districts
• 40 CFD transactions completed to date in Arizona. Yy,
• 15 cities/towns have CFDs to date: s: ;{Y:{.:
rye...�f�.:
✓ Phoenix, Scottsdale, Goodyear, Apache Junctionvarana, Fountain Hills,
Prescott, Surprise, Casa Grande, Carefree, L• t•.:;Ark, Buckeye,
Prescott Valley, Peoria, Youngtown
• $263,000,000 in bonds issued (almost 75% ge eras obligation ds)
• Multiple new transactions/districts currentl f :nyder diussion.
tIr
✓ S�ahuarita, Camp Verde, Casa
Buckeye, Marana, Prescott Valle}�:F�� :�.�n ,;.,:-��
Grande46N-
. �'•��.
ryBoardry
Community Facilities Districts Council .nd Dstrict Actions
^�'��� I:ir.:. rt Wr.
➢ Cit /Town Council:
14'w
VerfetiAlow,,,ff � rl14
• Approves Development• Adopts Resolution approving, Ytgfjeral•
tSS:p
l,.
an, forms District
➢ District Board: "A:'�; r,.
•
Approves Deve f�}:f:}i��
'•:::,i:,
�
` Gentili
a
Plan, etc.• Adopts Reso< 2,6
• Calls Bond X �•r ' . u ,F%1yyt;
• Conduc sublic ��..T ng on Feasibility Report
Ad. :., . ..xi.:.�.
•
• Zi •on ! :. ving Feasibility Report
14 rte, 'i�-�'';r f. <f:.Yi.,.'}:.:r
•cif:", «;%'•
• '$'s Reso " approving bond documents
1074
Desirable Irgi_oper Ch• :Iteristics
CFD's are a C1 'fr' ` tive e,i0t between cities and developers to ensure high quality,
responsible corn -,2 >. .-.. lopment•
➢ Developer ,4 Wood track record and strong financial backing
➢ Developer who'develops a community, not a subdivision
➢ Financial commitments by Developer
Community Facilities Districts
➢ The CFD enables the utilization of long-term, tax-exempt financing= increased
development flexibility and significant cost savings.
➢ This allows the new community to be of the highest quality with no financial
impact to the existing population.
Mr. Moore reviewed CFD Debt Options and Comparisons. He also pointed out that:
• No two transactions are exactly alike
• Time is not on our side
01/05/04 Minutes, Council Study Session 2
• CDFs add value; they do not make a bad project into a good project.
• Be prepared for change in:
➢ The development community
➢ The bond market
➢ The political climate
Economic Development Administrator Jeff Weir stated that the Economic Development
Agreement Policy allows for the Council to consider sharing revenues for retail and
commercial developments. This agreement asks for the formation of a CFD in 2 different
aspects. 1) Improvements that the developer would be making that are considered to
benefit the public as a whole. Improvements along Oracle Road that add to the safety
considerations for acceleration/deceleration lanes, turns at median : ffic light at
Suffolk Drive, and ;:;;"drainage improvements on Northern Avenin . Weir stated that the
g y.>::
developer would be installing all of the infrastructure at once;;a, e Town is
considering some public improvements primarily along Magee Rcf4 �0 e intersection at
`��`���•In additio°�""��>.va.: : a e
Northern Avenue eastward to the First Avenue alignme rN!,. g
y�y�;FY�;•;� xr,�`&fes .
wouldbe made si ' is the new " G taw " to Oro
improvements along Oracle Road .;.: g
Valley. This project would be considered to be 14,11jn a
4le phase".
rasa•S r...•y110
rr✓�f.^�v4.:.
In answer to aquestion byMayor Loomis, Mr. Weir%Ot d
y ��,(�f��/,y.that the developer would
spend approximately $3 million and the . ;:is estimat* spend between $4 million
and $5 million. Final numbers should b*Iiii010-44the nt`30 days or so.
'r1 v,:a ��% /.rr1�•; r�,;., �::i�.�:F<;. 44X,0'. r..,: 1..rn.�y::.>.i:.:...
,;:`',4,0151411"'
Mayor Loomis stated that he is t ing to uaiir" the!1`'magnitude of the investment and
how that balances betweensomer�a :�:
r type of financing that may be done at a
lower cost. `qr 11;
' / 54r qi'1.6l
•*5:.:
%'rlr.�': ::. .,c,rl-.:::yvn'ri:..4•:%riC:!�N`r'>.4w..:.:Y:::..:•.::
yil
Town Manager Chuck S>� - t t C.av size of the issue will drive the type of
financing. This w';;:;v-:; - ana ` r': „to determine what is in the best interest of the Town.
%i1rr;.
r r 7r • .. �
: /
•., 3.
t•:
Mary Beth A4;��=�"with '43.:c- ,& R �
:.
explained how the proposed Economic Agreement
complies '1. -;y- EDA P. 'i: and that the proposed development will provide unique
and new serve 4 - • the T• These uses will generate new jobs and add sales tax
/iii
revenues, as we ':Vig-• '1,,M),,i_onew and innovative technology. Ms. Savel explained that the
•
revenue sharing woF, "`ck in September 2005 or sooner if the project is completed
before then. She sho ped the Oracle Crossings Design Concepts and stated that she has
been working with the neighbors for the past 10 months. She showed the restaurant pad
concept and garden restaurant concept. She explained that they will be coming forward
in late March with a full development plan. Prior to that process, they will be
coordinating with the neighbors to show a more detailed view corridor simulation, noise
buffering and sound wall. An acoustic engineer is preparing a formal sound study and
will give his recommendation.
Ms. Savel stated that in meeting with the neighbors, they expressed their desire to
preserve and maintain the rural Northern Avenue with use of low lighting, not a lot of
concrete or walls. She stated that the restaurants will be located on Oracle Road.
01/05/04 Minutes,Council Study Session 2
In answer to a concern about smells, Mr. Weir stated that air standard issues have to be
addressed and enforced by Pima County. Mr. Weir stated that he will provide
information to the neighbors to give assurance of odor control.
In answer to a question by Council Member Abbott regarding Town representation at
meetings with the neighbors, Mr. Weir replied yes that he, as well as Council Member
Rochman and Council Member Johnson have met with the neighbors. Mr. Weir pointed
out that it is their intention to interact with the neighbors whenever they can. They have
tried to address some of the neighbors concerns directly and made the developer aware as
well.
J f
Mayor Loomis asked that the Council give any detailed questio v4Od comments that
they may have to Jeff Weir. > r ,•
r
f.xyt'
.v7
breakdown of the CFD a : � i ation i i .`:.�,:;:,..ation of a
Mayor Loomis asked for the p �p
,moi / .'T�f•::
, r
break-even point to help determine if the Town sho ; a : rticipate or seri acilitate it
N
the developer. He asked that on the list for th- N *
for /� ��elopp��t plan, maks sure that our
development standards include air quality require W `12tr
: ate"
;.
from they {., ors and a list of upcoming
Council Member Abbott asked for corn h::�.�I'�•�: p
meeting dates with the neighbors. : Nrt,
°
Mr. Sweet clarified that this item will con :
; `> :"�.„ '-thefown Council at their February 4,
2004 meeting. 1,40o-
4.-";."?0.5'"
r
ADJOURNMENT �: +,e1'
.'v` ,�.a >�'. mac; r�•a,•l:n, ,f'
A MOTION was .• - by r•il Member Johnson and SECONDED by Vice Mayor
Wolff at 5.45 • -r: 4: .. —
.�j.�J�'`'f�,,/;.������• �' � •.�. IED 50.
r�
1::-./..,:> -;'r.,F+{/.,;vii.
Respectfully submitted,
40''i ✓ii f/r/yH/�,
Kathryn E. Cuvelier, CMC
Town Clerk
MINUTES
ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL
REGULAR SESSION
JANUARY 7, 2004
ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE
REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 7:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER 7:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Paul Loomis, Mayor
Werner Wolff, Vice Mayor �%
% 1i.nr
Paula Abbott, Council Member /,//;-,.,r.. .
Avg
Dick Johnson, Council Memb- i r>�:• � <<;�
Bart Rochman, Council Me -'6
r r/
M'fi
•
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
/r,f
/yor ,„
rYy
t S i,i ���+,f •::
Mayor Loomis led the audience in the Pledge of A - Oyu
UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCE:4_
.G./'r,f: f+.;cy1'ia.. .rF./rY.i•s.
Town Manager Chuck Sweet reviewed t 'fico r. .airi
yngs and events.
/'y'
',0:4147P
Mayor Loomis welcomed ev-`r:: . the ,:F O04 and then thanked the staff and the
citizens for their support, }ani_ ephonwr
.( is during his recent illness.
111
Nit/
CALL TO AUDIENC '10,44/-;,-' `d f
04:01**,,,Helen Dankwe - .
0
� Drive, questioned the rationale behind hiring a
Fire Marsh a at this tim c :'enti-/t
i t er Ranch Fire District and Rural Metro Fire
�f4•f,r:`:
/�'f':c� V#/:-
Department".
•"' dy have Marshals that will help support the Town of Oro Valley.
She also states^ r' fire pry:l. :tion is upper most in the thought of the citizens and they
'`""fboitfire service based on a comprehensive analysis of all aspects
should be able t•A y�� t ��
y/`, �'y,.,� }.
of such a choice in . .: costs, fees, taxes, insurance implications, etc. She stated that
the current high stuns girds should be maintained.
1. CONSENT AGENDA
MOTION: Council Member Johnson MOVED to APPROVE the Consent Agenda as
presented. Vice Mayor Wolff SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —0.
A. Minutes—9/20/03 TC/Department Head Annual Retreat (continued from
12/17/03); 12/08/03; 12/15/03; 12/17/03
01/07/04 Minutes, Council Regular Session 2
B. Approval of the extension of the Grievance Review Board Citizen Members
current terms—Jack ReDavid and Ethel Rocco, effective January 1, 2004—
June 30, 2004
C. Rejecting all bids for Project No. OV-22-04-03 Oro Valley Water Utility
Hydrant Security System
D. Resolution No. (R)04-01 Approving the establishment of a No Parking Zone
in the right-of-way along the Shadow Mountain Drive from Calle Concordia
south to Meadowbrooke Drive; along Rolling Hills Drive from Shadow
Mountain Drive east to Overlook Drive; along Overlook Drive from Calle
Concordia south to Meadowbrooke Drive
E. Reappointment of Leann O'Brian and Rich Hawkinson to the Stormwater
Utility Commission with terms expiring October 30, 20 t JO/
•
2. PUBLIC HEARING—APPROVAL OF AN APPI;,,eYYoo:y /f ON FOR A
SERIES 10 (BEER AND WINE STORE) LIQUOR LICATALINA
MART ORACLE/MAGEE LOCATED AT 8080 N. ;; CLE
Town Clerk Kathryn Cuvelier reviewed the Cou ¢ :: rY om#7,0"a
. ;: ation and 'eported that
durin that time. She
the property was posted for 20 days. No protests ,44, r, ., g
also reported that Chief Sharp has conducted a back : . investigation and has no
p41E4,-
objections
, /
objections to the approval of the Series 1,11: :•uor Lice ,6 ,,
F r�fr j.
Mayor Loomis opened the public hearin ir./4,ber&,$,,,,iii,,,rix.speakers, the public hearing
may::. f '•:.'•rr..:.,-.f. 's:
was closed. "
• 4'1'``b i :� VIOV to APPROVE the request for a Series 10
MOTION. Council Me ,� • -,�� � ;
Liquor License for Rob "'ahlst :.;' . s rirn als at Catalina Mart Oracle/Magee
located at 8080 N. Oraci�` : I ::. < .y, ember Rochman SECONDED the motion.
45
Motion carried 5 — '�'` ;f
�:
;:tri"•':�/•y::,.
y�y�'ffn'/rb�yY/�.Mfy' /
::;f ��l�fyl7�ti aid `f,:'
„T 1
3. PU *:'" HEA — ' r `VEST TO ANNEX APPROXIMATELY 135.9
ACRES '£: INCOR ^: , A TED TERRITORY LOCATED SOUTH AND WEST
OF THE C NT TO .,, LIMITS INCLUDING A PORTION OF THE
�4��NN/iFY"t rN:ii. ���..
NORTH HAL -: i .:�� ':';;!''/ION 22, WITHIN A PORTION OF THE NORTH EAST
ONE 1/ OF SEC "10.4:4,<�.; , AND WITHIN A PORTION OF SECTION 15,
TOWNSHIP 11 SO I H, RANGE 13 EAST, GILA AND SALT RIVER
MERIDIAN, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA
Special Projects Coordinator Scott Nelson reported that the Town Council voted to
initiate the annexation process for this property on November 19, 2003. He explained that
the annexation request consists of 135.9 acres known as "Area G" and is located
immediately south of Stone Canyon and north of La Cholla Air Park. Mr. Nelson
explained that the blank petition, map and legal description were filed with the Pima
County Recorder on December 12, 2003 and all requirements for notification have been
filled. He also reported that the net fiscal impact for year 1 would be $3,819.23 with the
01/07/04 Minutes, Council Regular Session 3
5 year net fiscal impact at $62,719.37 (built on assumptions of build out of approximately
30 homes.)
Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing.
Carol Nellis, 1720 W. Tortolita Vista, asked about trash pickup, recycling, water service,
fire service and police response. She stated that she had concerns whether fire trucks,
ambulances, or police cars could even access her property. She also asked about
maintenance of the roads.
Mayor Loomis closed the public hearing. He then asked Town Manager Chuck Sweet to
follow up with Ms. Nellis regarding her questions and concerns. , `': ,
.091PC/
4. RESOLUTION NO. (R)04-02 SUPPORTING AN::` A.MENDING
A"I r::
SECTIONS 42-6106; 48-5303; 48-5304; 48-5309 ARIZO-�f :1NSD STATUTES;
AMENDING LAWS 1990 CHAPTER �?..380, SECTIO,', !?"'y .
,?�; x
,?amu { d
59 •r+,ice{`.:_:.
/ALI ..4
•
Paul Nzomo, Civil Engineer III, explained that thy, .y a A ,:. `,ration of Governments
(PAG) Regional Council has passed a resolution A' ` ?>4:� .; ma County jurisdictions to
support the reauthorization of the expired taxing aut `` He stated that it is the intent
of the PAG Regional Council to proceed the estab 40,-,nt of a Regional
„YY!'.{,•rAnb,+H.YfG�` :. •nr 1•'ir .,.
Transportation Authority to deal with t :° multi t : .1 transportation issues
!
facingthe PAG region. He explained the,. •s ;t;
g p � , o):"� :` �{-� ,could deal with the major
•u •sdictional��r.•
regional issues and not with jurisdictional:,n �`
010ik VIP
Mayor Loomis explained/t0p-acellthe 19 °+ �sy�•
�� PAG was provided the authorization
through the Legislature,. theegiona.1 Tr:d• .portation Authority and to have taxing
/fi•`�,+ fir, {'Z'i*': Y•::
ability. That taxing abitU. es , „- "and PAG is looking to go to the
Legislature and asl;, i em to' . - the legislation to take the sunset away and to again
allow PAG to
s 0,A,-�tna -1/` .- sortation Authority. He explained that it is a very
strict roces " they : t.o �r• "ough with the regional transportation plan, getting it
approved ;r.' � PAG a d then puttingit to the voters prior to any tax ever happening.
pp , � �: �.�`
1 • `h.h`an es are: A) Take awaythe sunset clause and sunset it for
He explaine�.r• ��•,;�, e mai��f g
another twenty ;;- r(changing the time frame associated with all the elements of
�� " on Authorityfrom 10years to 20 ears • and B) Include all
the Regional Transr��,:�� years);
members of PAG as titing members of the Regional Transportation Authority.
Council Member Johnson commented that something needs to be done regarding
transportation on a regional basis. This action would provide a unified voice from Pima
County to the Legislature which may help resolve transportation issues.
MOTION: Council Member Johnson MOVED to APPROVE Resolution (R)04-02
supporting an Act amending Sections 42-6106; 48-5303; 48-5304; 48-5309 Arizona
Revised Statutes; amending Laws 1990 Chapter 380, Section 8. Vice Mayor Wolff
SECONDED the motion. Motion carried, 5 —0.
01/07/04 Minutes, Council Regular Session 4
5. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF AN ADDITIONAL PLANS EXAMINER
POSITION AND TO SUPPLEMENT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT, BUILDING SAFETY DIVISION BUDGET
Community Development Director Brent Sinclair reviewed the Council Communication
and reported that the Town is experiencing a broad-based increase in residential and
commercial construction activity. He explained that they are requesting an addition of a
Plans Examiner primarily for commercial activity in order to be able to respond to the
current and future demand for prompt and accurate plan review. He then reported that
the cost of the position would be approximately $63,000 (includes benefits) per year with
the impact to the current budget year being about $21,000.
.te�,f
Mr. Sinclair and Chris Kiel, Senior Plans Examiner, reviewed o. r , ~�,.ads depicting the
Building Plan Review Activity and Commercial Building Pl.:.$:: g r: :, ty for Calendar
Year 2003 showing a continual increase from April/May t-ctiih t ;; ,d of the year.
.�*Pk f(Also shown were the statistics for Calendar Year 200 �: ,: Y,:} v
,,A1' --10;,,
Mr. Sinclair stated that theyhave not been able tof-. n" '
F., ,y; the,:SKr ,artment sft
day target for
„ , activity. H e also explained
plan review due to the increase in commercial an.��,rf ��,r-A_`1r
that the costs of the additional position would be of .Nfl, ewer expenditures in outside
professional services. He then reviewed eve., ample o `y:;, ,ax revenue for typical
r:�.' :r,G,.ra.
'�3"�4�''/.f, ry'�i.^:-. . rr/. Y orf..
business types and explained that a loss . . :� h V 0.,. e is rw f fed when commercial plan
r,`. ✓.r.a4;416,-, '!
reviews are delayed. y,, ....
ro�!'��' .
1j rX ��.. YF.
;..;,..:, -,,,,r:1,
www
In response to a question fro4440�� �: 0: it Me ,, .N .ochman, Mr. Sinclair explained that the
r� .',`,`�I':f'Y i+rr: 'y:.r� 'r
last "boom" in residential `. 7 in 1998 —2000. He explained that
- � omes •. .�.a.
production home review
is much - than f mmercial plan review; however, even at
that time, an additional " r ,v 4�. $ `:N•:,Ak�. .. gadded. He stated that they are now
reviewingmore cust:Q ,, hors"3•�: 'T . y s, institution plans and tenant improvements which are
/,e,,,/:,, ,,,
more complica ", an,,,,..,0deroduction homes. Mr. Sinclair further explained that
r „r:'./`.r9•�".y5y>,�^:Y„xYry r ''
+/:•.•�� ..gin/-`'• • `��'i.there was a Gas ':ale" r•�,;;.r; � hl � �..;�over the past two years, but now with such a large
increase in : . t , the de•.:�::""` ment is in need of additional staff He stated that the Town
has never facedr?'`'. h broadbased growth in commercial, institution, and residential
activity as it has��- :..,:• h.�,�)�Y. 3. t year.
4.r
Further discussion fo towed regarding:
■ Watch for"red flags" and keep ahead of the demand.
• Keep the standards high as commercial increases, but provide a positive
experience for retailers, developers, etc. Set good tone for the Town.
• Provide a measurement showing the effect of having an additional Plans
Examiner and report back to Council on improvements.
• Increase of work load has provided an increase in fees collected. Have met 100%
of fiscal year projections in first four months for commercial fees and residential
collections are 30% above projections.
01/07/04 Minutes, Council Regular Session 5
MOTION: Council Member Abbott MOVED to APPROVE the additional Plans
Examiner position and supplement the Community Development Department, Building
Safety Division budget by $21,000 to be transferred from the Town's General Fund
Contingency. Council Member Rochman SECONDED the motion. Motion carried,
5 -0.
6. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF SUPPLEMENTAL FUNDING TO THE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BUILDING SAFETY DIVISION BUDGET TO
PURCHASE HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE TO ENABLE ONLINE PLAN
REVIEW SERVICES AND PUBLIC ACCESS TO PERMITS PLUS
Community Development Director Brent Sinclair reported that witt$��j. se increase in
business (as explained in the previous Agenda item,) the Buildi ;:N :fety Division is also
trying to provide better customer service. He explained that , :: rs:.ding on-line access
',Y ,{ 'y�J p^'Y"'jam.
for customers to the Permits Plus tracking system and onli . an ?. 4 v services, Town
staff would be more efficient and it would allow the cu:Ayers to be1Y$),;-:./�-:.aware of what
na�yy,,.. ,4,,54,2-,'4..
4 a 5,�ii.'L.
is goingon with their project, provide easier and im p `'."gate access to i x tion,
inspections results, etc. Mr. Sinclair explained t ,,,; J: tot., ,st for upgrading the server,
migration of current information to the new softw''':&.,siitftr user licenses would be
$29,200. tapir e
4,;,(4•• 4,,,,,isi,
followed regarding: r.,. .'_ . ,,
l'ot '
Discussiong g : ,�,... .;, ,3,. ,.,, ,
• On-line review would be efficien'Lye ye . t'
�y and efforts of Town staff
and customers. Beneficial to all. ` , /01W-''''40"
■ Going in right directis 4,.,;,5 - hese i r e vements.
' 9 6 : 6 months once server is installed.
,,,,
• Software mi ratio N;� � a +6 •-alone ,,,,,x„
i g*,
b. %:yv. n'� q
• On-line plan rev'",„, v: voul ' : .,slab most immediately (experimenting
alreadywith this.tFtri)*****-1,-,':`'''Oro Valle w .uld b� .:� -f■ ` ��• fof the first municipalities to provide this service.
• AZ;7, '' ' ... ar - ,• experimented with on the new hospital project.
On-ling.. u . ��
Du t) Fz h sic: Y” z:sect'‘,,,,c-data is entered immediatelyinto Town's data
�
'�,tf,Jsf
s st ,,o the hos: : ,;:{:{administrator and contractor can review the project at the
y - ., , n .��s,,:x.
same"f °'4,e;:/,'5,4*,: yk: e Tow ,;�Q: Building Administrator is reviewing the information.
•trances/resolutions that require particular formats for submittals.
• Create �� �:���.z,�t� � q
■ Concerns e 'il , ed regarding controls and limits applied to make sure proper
protections a ?
rfin place in the system that allow the right timing, and prevents
adjustments, etc. Also, where is the liability—Town, Supplier, or Licensee?
• Would any changes in printing costs be realized?
• Move in a controlled manner; make sure new system is reliable.
• Provide status reports to keep the Council updated.
• Comments back to Town staff regarding on-line permitting would be received
through e-mail.
• Cost to those who want to access information would be $1800. Would start
taking payments once system is completely installed and "live."
01/07/04 Minutes, Council Regular Session 6
MOTION: Council Member Rochman MOVED to APPROVE to supplement the
Community Development Building Safety budget in the amount of$29,200 to be
transferred from the General Fund Contingency. Council Member Abbott SECONDED
the motion. Motion carried, 5 —0.
TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT—No report.
COUNCIL REPORTS —No reports.
DEPARTMENT REPORTS
Police Chief Sharpreported that through deployment that was imp : 1-„-nted about six
p gp �;�...
fy
..;.statistics show the
weeks ago by saturating parking lots of the major commercial s•�=r;°;;r
crime rate was down during the holiday period,
Thanksgiving-;r !.4.'
Years
ears Day. He
reported that there were no assaults, no purse snatchings, #a4
o vehicle break-
ins and no armed robberies in the Town duringthis e r Ie tha ` . r: e Council, the
Department, the Volunteer Patrol and the co `�0-i .;,',;�;
Police 6 ����ity for their s ��, ' �: and
/!. .wry.
dedication. '''45LL,, 40'
*4-ikAZ'CALL TO AUDIENCE ��i
y,Yt ;Y:y.,f:
Barry Gillaspie, 8 801 N. Riviera Drive ` "`"" N, :l.
::• �:�-� e app�� ��: � of the funding for the on-
line " ��`'�'+�' � � e cautioned that the costs
plan review services and for the sup 'y %to . .•,✓.� � ',`rf;:,
should not be underestimated to improve t »y" : Ff` uc >`e (delivery mechanisms of
electronic data, support costs.f >eo1 etc.) °'so stressed the importance of support for
the staff as it takes time to; me > :t;techn.l Y., , make it work, communicate with the
�i.
..yin: ::
public and make it succi i . ! >,>
'!i,-y''.Yy��: Jy.�y.f �i!!!”y ffr,.!,.`,/G> �i`•1,13{: �i�
2y4.N!t.eY`l:•N!+ /�i%! !fll, �,:! l::y'!v
ADJOURNMENT '1*A
5!�'l,.i 7"is•a•i..
.1.r•rG::' r. r:
MOTION: ff'z ncil Me r Jo i0 cn MOVED to ADJOURN at 8:10 p.m. Vice Mayor
l S#'r�'� .0':.
Wolff SE /y(��y%. $"h ED the mn. Motion carried, 5 —0.
orie
4/0
11410:�;✓.:!xi<:;i
Respectfully submitted,
Roxana Garrity, CMC
Deputy Town Clerk
01/07/04 Minutes, Council Regular Session 7
I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes
of the regular session of the Town of Oro Valley Council of Oro Valley, Arizona held
on the _7th_ day of January 2004. I further certify that the meeting was duly called
and held and that a quorum was present.
Dated this day of , 2004.
Kathryn E. Cuvelier, CMC ,`
Town ClerkiV
.•f: %f%!�tr�i.// •N.
',fe
9k'. v
,,,,,,..4r*
A,'")'. .- ,ste,
n0/;Ff `:: /J :ir..
:r}f49.';:!,
' :ff// rJ/JYf
'f
'+ /r n:
44415/04--„,:, v*:,--,-;e,
C ( ;' N.F
#,I50, -.',:weig,g,,,f4*,. *,
�'• f shy r.
414i, 4:01 ' '"1"/
ii,/40, t:
41,1'
{/ f •Nj fel.i. f:i:�f`lJ%,�.:/ f,,y L 1";----,,,6›:;,,,,..-,).::P'-,,,,---..-as' L�"
•r N.:
..4*(;;.);;,,,
-041N01;".' '<,„0:::1,.,,
7{7'/�+' b F�~ ''''.4114-;;#?..,'.�/Lf��. f/ $ r
.(�{{qrY: •qtr:
"y/fr< 4. Wh 4.
/�wr
��� fy'Y'am[ p
q
J
.-'4',.,-,W..`,,, �
40:454,4
./y./fr r,l•.
+/f Jf:..
MINUTES
ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL/BUDGET & BOND COMMITTEE
JOINT STUDY SESSION AND SPECIAL SESSION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL
JANUARY 12, 2004
ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS
11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE
STUDY SESSION—AT OR AFTER 4:30 PM
CALL TO ORDER—4:30 P.M.
PRESENT:
Oro Valley Town Council: Budget & Bond Con .:i:
ttee:
Paul Loomis, Maor Lyra Done, Vice C .4 -"
y',
Werner Wolff, Vice Mayor Anil Hiremath
Paula Abbott, Council Member Bob Jennens , f
�:�:�:: ��f.� .rte:
•Dick Johnson, Council Member Bob Schli g(arnved35p.m.)
Bart Rochman, Council Member Excuse , "`' Honey Pivi -Chair
y.• "` Ufa.
` :"
REVIEW OF BUDGET AND BOND ADVISO� çe
ITTEE�
RECOMMENDATION REGARDING REVEN :: ANCEMENT
ORDINANCES
:l JJrf lir Y / "+.`Jn
��GdS' �.. fir:
t . 6 I` " ? the Town Revenue Plan
:450Vice Chair Lyra Done reviewed the Exec�� t n:e r . t` `,;-f
bythe Budget and Bond Commi :.
{`� �:���ing'' neral Fund Projects through
prepared g ��+f•� ..
:::., /
2009/10 and reviewed the fol $1,41t` Key A s.' :v.°ptions•
,
•
Generallyrevenu . ex's•-nditure
• - .�� �•� t�}*prot ected to increase by 4% annually.
Tft,�Jjr/rs.�."•`• ,ntr.lff.; .f,rry..• $400K increase,, :P fue "
• No staffing incre• + A `i ' otai.UY,P4 levels.
• Does not ; 5 '- ado . -.1 local sales tax revenue potential from new
comm 4',:, 0 .me ivoionnexations.
aft' it ` ., of recommended 2/° increase in sales tax rate for
• Do •� � included ��. `"�:`J °
-o- �.
con .4on contr.ii `Og activities which would generate approximately $525,000
'.9` S 3i�i
annua ' $3.2 ..; 'rough FY 2009/10•
OLIN�• { • t 45882 b• PAG o y ections increase from current estimate of 37,260 0 y
p p �: J
y is
2010. :fv
• Does not include operating cost estimates for potential service level expansion
associated with certain issues:
➢ 10,000 square foot library expansion
➢ Naranj a Town Site
➢ Historical preservation (Steam Pump Ranch—Kelly Ranch—
Hohokam/Honey Bee Sites)
➢ Maintenance of 2.0 officers per 1,000 population ratio
Mrs. Done summarized that as a result of direction by the Town Council, the Budget and
Bond Committee has taken the following actions:
01/12/04 Minutes,Council/Budget&Bond Joint Study Session& 2
Special Session of the Town Council
• Favorably recommends increasing the construction sales tax rate from 2% to 4%
with 75% of the 2% increase earmarked for streets and roads maintenance. The
rate would be modified via ordinance and the two earmarkings could be
accomplished with a resolution.
• Recommends tabling/no action on a Town use tax based on the assumption that it
would not help local businesses. These thoughts are based in part on comments
made to the Committee by Economic Development Administrator Jeff Weir and
the Northern Pima County Chamber of Commerce.
• Will consider utility and telecommunications taxes at its January 2004 meeting.
The Committee is not optimistic that the local revenue base will significantly
improve over the next three to five years but would like to wait and see if things
other than construction activity improve. 4:. .
ya4
";
Additionally, the Budget and Bond Committee has included """" {% : e revenue
*74
projections dated November 17, 2003 for Council conside `tion. ^'
•
ow
In answer to questions by Council Member Johnson .�r%..,:rdin ro ected venues based
on additional commercial development, Financeff- for ,,,sste Andrews stated that the
2004•
mid-year budget will be reviewed with the Town •Wt.i0;,.'''January26,
'.!.f'•. fh.
Mayor Loomis asked if the sales tax ord ,$,,could be �'. t,ed withan emergency
clause. He expressed concern with the £:si. ;x,75%o n g to Operations and
Maintenance. He stated that he is okaybled c �,, money to transportation,
�"� Ail themonies were to run
however, he expressed concernwith desig .; `o 0 Si M in case o
YS ��r:.
��� ��`�"`��~� puttinga 75%
out. He felt that it would res �' �,..xY udge•°ca ability by designation in
the Ordinance ""`"` `" `
: " } M ''at the 75% was reached because every Town Engineer P . . `:rz..� ^ : ::y year
Public Works ask -' .I.' '/finical Advisory Committee for $2.5 million for roadway
•
projects. How : : iv icy ".� ly receive $700,000 to $800,000• They felt that by
/' 4: Oji%:y.�+.Y££%£.
receiving •
7S:Kt•:�� the re 'y;: s fro construction sales tax, the funds might help them to
"catch up'944,;;,,-ded fun4,44
'te*, '0"
Town Attorney µ ; tz stated that if the Council wants to earmark a certain
of reven 'o r specific uses, it should be done separately percentage p p y from the ordinance
increasing the tax rate: He stated that the percentages could be done by resolution, which
would allow for more flexibility.
Based on discussion by Council, Mayor Loomis asked that the Committee identify any
additional revenues from projected commercial development and its impact to the budget.
The committee should revise their revenue projections, showing the General Fund
balance and projections as of today, and another worksheet showing revised projections
with the additional commercial development coming in within the next 10 years.
01/12/04 Minutes,Council/Budget&Bond Joint Study Session& 3
Special Session of the Town Council
Town Manager Chuck Sweet stated that the increase in construction sales tax does not
differentiate between residential and commercial. It was pointed out that Marana and
Tucson both collect 4% on construction for residential and commercial development.
Council Member Johnson pointed out that Oro Valley does not have a property tax.
In answer to a question by Council Member Abbott, Mr. Andrews stated that the
expenditures for Mayor & Council is too low since it is based on 5 council members and
not 7. He will adjust the projections to reflect a 7 member council.
Mayor Loomis asked that the Committee do the following:
• Bring forward the construction tax recommendation and re��n' luate the 75%
'SY�4.•.k'%
dedication to roads. "` "'`
• Not move forward with the use tax. :,r�' :}
i r
• look at utilitytaxes (if revenues wont at leh :. :. I;;.million, then not
Continue to w
worth enacting the tax)• More discussion need p t {:....3
fake lace ����:�.� ° s issue such
as; continue to look at approach,based on c ation numbers r: ed on growth
that may or may not happen. :'•
*Iv
`
• Place the Ordinance adopting the increase r"�`�: .;��:etion sales tax at the Council
meeting of 2-4-04.
• Consider a separate resolution a ;1atr time desi i.:g the percentages of where
the revenues should be used. :.. `` 'Y
�/•';
ADJOURNMENT Y� ln
;4241,K, ly
i
r �t� 'r,�.�✓sj
r.,�r3i •.
A MOTION was made b.,n'r.•✓' ///.�� e M :• Wolf
SECONDED
ECONDED by Council Member
Johnson to adjourn the ' tud/: ! ?:oii 2 •m• MOTION carried unanimously
ly 5
41:,„,,00,10,03,#W
J:'yg /0�s
—0. 4-40e40",'‘.—
"44#4,f,
'✓!,"�.r ,N; , �•ii�::; � .
SPECIAL S Y1 -°f/ e s irately following the 4:30 p.m. study session
,:R:',,�i'r,.:.yr'r.�• �t>'r!J1'f4�^`r':.,s'::
CALL TO,: _::
�!JH.
we
PRESEN 1,0,!; ul Loom , ` ayor
erri -
WVice Mayor
P ;';�. �;f4 `Council Member
�Pi'+.;//
Dick ' ;f,6 son, Council Member
Bart Rochman, Council Member
1. CONSIDERATION AND/OR POSSIBLE ACTION RELATING TO ORO
VALLEY PROJECTS POTENTIALLY APPEARING ON THE MAY 2004 BOND
ELECTION
Town Manager Chuck Sweet stated that the members of the Pima County Bond Advisory
Committee will be holding a public meeting on January 14, 2004, 7:00 p.m. at The
Manning House, 450 West Paseo Redondo. During this meeting, the Bond Advisory
Committee will present its recommendations to the local elected officials, facilitate a
public dialogue between elected officials, and solicit support from the officials for the
01/12/04 Minutes,Council/Budget&Bond Joint Study Session& 4
Special Session of the Town Council
recommended bond program. He stated that the Pima County Board of Supervisors will
consider the Bond Committee's recommendations at their meeting of January 20, 2004.
Oro Valley Bond Committee representative Bob Jennens reviewed the following list of
Oro Valley projects that the Pima County Board of Supervisors are considering for the
proposed May 2004 Bond Election:
➢ Kelly Ranch $ 2.5 million
➢ Steam Pump Ranch $ 2.0 million
➢ Honey Bee Village $ 1.0 million
➢ Oro Valley Public Library Expansion $ 1.1 million
,f04,
In answer to a question by Council Member Johnson, Mayor Lgor004,y.r:: stated that during
the meeting on Wednesday he will brin u the issue of how' , . ill be designated
and administered between the countyand each jurisdictionOTheit: 4election is
r X4,:4.
approved by the voters. ' ;
�''„fig,
:'a•z;,..fix' ,�' >...
Yom:J FA: •,,'v l;
,moi.
MOTION: Council Member Rochman MOVOadd0
illion for parks and land
Arai,. �� yrry'j acent to Naranja Town
/.:r4
acquisition, for 28 acres located along Tangerine !: . 'a.
MOTION SECONDED byCouncil Member Jeri'
f MOTION carried 5 — 0.
Site.
'405L,
k
Mayor Loomis introduced the Alternatee:�
.° t :' :,Counynd Committee John Neis,
" •"•" resentation of Oro Valley on
and thanked Mr• Neis and Mr. Jennens f•';see "4;%,"•..
the Pima C aY% , ;�; `;:
County Bond Advisory Commit fGF7
OA*
irg
EXECUTIVE SESSION14,!!: ,.A ' • A x�NT T : S 38-431.03 (A)(7) PURCHASE OR
LEASE OF REAL PV / RTYfSOMPratir CARD
'
E TOWN FACILITIES RESEARCH
INFORMATION % fi
•iii:
A MOTION w "- ::..x A°- ' .Co ':-•t ember Johnson to go into an Executive Session for
4F5.:: .ri'Y;
the purposeiff:44 abov°=:: -{ 50 pay MOTION SECONDED by Council Member
' {jea ION ca 't" :5 — 0. Ma or Loomis announced that in addition to Town
Rochman. yA ' y. ,... fw�r%
Clerk Kathry
.. lier Manager Chuck Sweet and Town Attorney Mark Lang itz;
Community De - lirector Brent Sinclair and Finance Director David Andrews
would be attendin_ hecutive Session. A MOTION was made to go out of Executive
Session at 6:38 p.m. b Council Member Johnson. MOTION SECONDED by Council
Member Rochman. MOTION carried 5 — 0.
ADJOURNMENT
A MOTION was made by Vice Mayor Wolff and SECONDED by Council Member
Johnson to adjourn the special session at 6:40 p.m. MOTION carried 5 —0.
01/12/04 Minutes,Council/Budget&Bond Joint Study Session& 5
Special Session of the Town Council
Respectfully submitted,
Kathryn E. Cuvelier, CMC
Town Clerk
I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and corr. ..; ::.opy of the minutes
of the Study/Special session of the Town of Oro Valley Coun ,.,:rUro Valley, Arizona
held on the _12th_ day of January 2004. I further certif 44Jte 'meeting was duly
called and held and that a quorum was present. r::
Dated this day ofIgr
•
41440/
Ittalte
J
.Y.N. G
• 1.
f yvJ.'-'..
KathrynE. Cuvelier,CMC "
,. y.�... NM'
r JcosJ urs:;>.
' rel%s'"';:>:;.
ry �f;•'T,:.{.�.
lJ"'`Yr'•�r/ �iSr rr/f{:;.y.•. >Y r`!
Town Clerk .% .,•:,v:.�.;, J �;
"oast,
�.:�
<>:::
f�Yry`
040.?
if* .
, µµ r �f'f{
/!:�4 ' 01 `
/,f
l0' J,fn
ay'
>rf 5'� r$.F•:r.{:ylJ�'y^ F'::".• J","`J,r`,, ±.ri�r.'.
?+?Y%4J f..;2':%{.i'JJ�.�,Y,J'f!tt:Ar
,rlr•'Jr�/l'y.¢. .S i��%G%y;�"i
Tfik
.�,..:^f•!�'�`'�j:. A-No �
ir
it
o
o B. ..
a
F ' . . •
1tror---Ico. -� -lncncn Zco -o5 0cn'Z0 KKT0XXXcnW Pi
11 CD CO O ,:' O b O p i , N c� m c o = c49-. 2. 2,_ Vaa 6 coi, <_ to ;p
a 0 n g n C) 1 c0 - f 2 '• -5 g o o . M aD 'v e m cD 8 S m tv N
aa < O g o a. 00cn : 3 a 02 0 cnfew n .
V B � -, m � m m --i c71 moo'' aK a cv k � g2
a g 3 3 a 7r, o
IC 1:3
= e =
o iji
o-0 � � � mC �' . rn a o
t " g
v, v, g- -
a p
F:.,, _ ... , . . i , i
; i., 6 .
n o Q O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O oo O OO
W WWWWWWWW
� � WrOW p� � rnA N � tOvoWcn wo1A ' NNv
O � rn
to
91 `
# • rrnn
1 -, s . .
.r v V -- (00) (.0 A -, A N - W
g q . .
N n
< pXI
AA
C q tit W toy" N
-66 P in A .
a .
A N N o w cc rn z
y O O) .h:
a `A � Sumo
aw. a 03 o Z � Z
a IN,
a ,,, ir, 70
d y N!� j M 0 W 0 A dt N v Cr) T N
N CO 2 -... 4' "-' � oto 'coN O N W aDO Z w
u)
F_. , , , , 4 4
a in
0 C.
t N m N . -+ O O O 0 --, O O o -+ 0 0 0 0 n) W A W O O cD o twD ' 13 "i
....1110 oso Zi
a , . , , I g
, - c
Al v• ' aM
0
VA NE0 EA ��
=W p N! N M a H to 0N4�� 0,.., .-4
rn
W EA ° � A =
W N p � CD O 0 O O O O O QO 0 O O p V wr., O A N1, Z •1
-n •
.
yip, a O ...4O NDd — y 0
7
U) .
in a
5 J .14. O Vt -a -40 -4014400000 -. 00 V O cD tV O --� ...,-44 w O N ;
4t .44
to N 3 t .
t0 O
Z
7 M M v. io. ,.... E Wi...„ ..1 iii) ii.424tort: 4^ j
V+ _ o,tor -, N ID 8 O la O O O O O 0- Z N Z cD rn ff1
• N �J CO
'44 0
N m C
"4 K.) , OTCOv+ ou� 000o -, 0 -► -� O0 Cio �°�',,, cg+ o4• 0too -n
y w _ Vf C
2 ;
• ♦ r z 0 -i
Mv.
... E ...a. 4A 44 VP ..1. tft •
444 4p 444
rr. g Z
Oo § W 4.4 OA W A t0 CD fA V /*
N ~ E E 4/) Eit 4,0) �N O N v " m
„ E
CA A yO O O O O LO,
44 O O O w c0 IQ O - Z
VN 11 C4D -+0tD y A (1t co OD -' 0 C
W A tr O O T
•"I
til
A , V • .
.17
�
p _
M n
O 1 � O m P N O N O N N O -+ -x O -.. 0 0 C w ~ � ^' .I), 4.4 g 0 8 E M 3
r i cn C
p
w r -1
%111110 40 gid! M NN 4A 414
Nt � ��
..
0 g
v.
N AO r — M M w 41' GJ d4 M 44' - 4,_ .50
..- -0 .. NuW O6owWOOOO O O O , N g
Z
W0t.) O0 0 CO , CO0) -� O 'CD W
-.�
tr.
we
PI
.o
a
3 .•
m . ..
EA .fft -EA {I f A
-� N N W co
(�},i O Cn 0 O p O
0 0 0
b b b b b 0 o
0o 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
o 0 0 0 0 0 0
l I I 1
Dec-02 'V7 o
iriclo a)
cn
'c9 =
kr, o
Jan-03 'v,
'o 0
',, E
sr cc.
Feb-03 'v,,
o
Mar-03 V(9 —
.50
U 61.68, =MI
teP
5
CO. CA
Apr-03 ,� su
o•� °. r°
o � ‘‹
CO x
May-03 CD
cn CD
c
X Jun-03 os `D
< ,,� �• r
�s 0
C `� s8' C
ca �s c�
Jul-03 �� w
s9' co K
7,,, w r.
Aug-03 0.,(5,7,.‘ y
o
.s
5.8`
7, Cl)
Sep-03 . °
‘9,5, -1
n
v1,9 v
Oct-03 '6' iv6.
0
Ow
co
Nov-03 �o
so
•o
ss,
0
Dec-03 �4)
Oa,
iiii
N O) co O N
O O O O O O
o 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dec-02
N
Jan-03 CP
0
oD
Feb-03n
co o
co
3
a
R:
v
Apr-03 CD
-8 CD
0
zV
May-03 c 3
* o CD
w
Jun-03
co Cc 0-1
0 f
64-
y
CD
c 0
Aug-03 A)
OD
N r.
W
Sep-03 03 g
oo
u.
Cl)co ,
Oct-03 co
Nov-03 ..- ' ----. - - --- ' • - -- - ' co
Dec-03 w
i
N -P
-s — N N
N
Q) COCD O )1 --P Q) OD O N41,
O O O O O O O O O O O O O
Dec-02
Jan-03 a
Feb-03 N
co Mar-03
O
w
5.
A.r-03,
-.I
co
73
w
May-03
cp Jun-03 ` �°
c) Jul-03 N —
a Au -03tn
c
co
��r11F�
su
Sep-03 co
p 'c
Oct-03 .
sir
Nov-03
73
Dec-03 ii N3 m<
6
_ D
0
et
Dec-02 (A) —'
Jan-03 ( r
su
Feb-03 r*
ov w
s. Mar-03
Q E
pr R.
-0 --g" May-03 U)
x
< Jun-03 y
O Jul-03 .1,
co
o
-
Au 03 0,
Aug-03 0)
g Sep-03 W
Oct-03 4,
Nov-03 co
Dec-03
- �. - -i. N N N
O al O 01 o (01 O 01 o UNi o
Dec-02 9
an-03 Co
g
Feb-03 CO
Mar-03I CT
N
pr-03 Jo
> May-03 0
leiLc:21;03 cfl
T
a Jul-03 co
c
N
Sep-03
N
Oct-03 w
Nov-03 ivCa
o _.
J CO
Dec-02 SU
-h
cri
Feb-03 N .13
Mar-03 0 CD
3
10y Ma03 o
O 0
a Jun-03 j o �.
Q Jul-03 cp �i N
o Z
Aug-03 ,j o r'•
Sep-03 co Ca
N
Oct-03 co _a
Nov-03 W
N
Dec-03
cp O
M
Cl)
Dec-02 y'
.
Jan-03
Feb-03
Mar-03 co
Apr-03 co
c
May-03 Cn
C r)
cc Jun-03 I n
Q
Jul-03 I co
N
u.ug-03
ao
Sep-03 co
Oct-03 11 Fli
Nov-03 to
tv
..
-� -- -, -k N N N N CA) CA) CA) CA)
N CTS -.i 0 N 01 --1 0 N 01 -J 0 N 01 -1
01 0 01 0 01 0 01 0 01 0 01 0 01 0 01
o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 1 I 1
Dec-02 N
N
Jan-03 N
al
f_.'2(0
Mar-03 a,
C)
Apr-03 w
c
May-03
a Jun-03 - 0)
n N co al
�.
0co
Jul-03 N Q
maim
Au -03 co
9 0
aw u)
Sep-03 0 �,
Oct-03 .
(; 1
W
CEJ z
Nov-03cc) �'
,,) co
N
maim
0
D
Dec-02 N .:
co
Jan-03
su
G,
Mar-03 4, g
CD o
Apr-03 c
to
03
-6) May-03 COCD
o Jun-03 toto
0 w
gl. Jul-03 a)
co
Aug-03
Sep-03
t-0 ' 00;
0
ov-03 01
0
pec-03 N
N
pncos D
Qj CD 0 0 C. • C C)
7c
- < 3p Q: f=tEra CD
D- -0 CCQ CCS O• -
C CD '< v Q) C) 0 C0D
O 70 77-0
CD CD Cn
< <
CD •
CD
Cl)
C
N �
-1
CC) -4 0) CO N
CO N CO CO
C
N co
O O
CO
CEJ
U)
CD
_ -� CA) -0 CP
"1 O O
O W CO O -1. CA
o r
0.)
rn
CO
-p CO 00 -4,
CA) 01 CEJ `' m co
- — Z
—
< >
CEJ 01 CO O r
Cn rn Cn O o w D Z
o n G)
N) N o < D
-I m
rn
cn
o D
CD
C —
o 0
Cn0)
CJI
O
O
v
O
C
C
m
O N �1
N W
.0
r3 r3•
y T'TI ?I 11?1 ON ,,-/
--1 t O -a j
. E pOQpocflpp - Qm(D,Ica O
" O O 0 O
---
it 22222 . ._ NO7.-tw (( 0m
N
. AEA*A c6 3j1� 01 O 01 888 Wo I -- �- m O
NWAeWWm SSSSSOpp
N O OO O A� � � � � m AW NOmoDDcV S S S Nas � O0N�� A
, --.11I 55.00. g.Npm
O S S O 1 i AW -AO �m WN O
OO 00 QQ� j3 p
4 Z- � OOOOo s m f.... -, z
3
to C wt.)... cawV 3 O m m m .
F , i , i , < „ to oo , 73
r..,; m O ...m. m a.�.
A ... MEM
- O b CD
'''w1Mq WIW3
11
xxxxxxx in
ri.c.
D CD 'CII) m tD m CD mmmmmmm 2- m . W _
O O A f A -< E Sp d1 V1 N co,
11111”
g ggr - 1 � -c
• _ ... x x x x
54 m m O m pJ A➢ Al' -, -, � -�
ci u d g a d d CD m CD [D c"g
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A nb
d ig," -..--,2____
O i� :a.
II
. 15 ,
-611
m g,
m 1 . . a n _a -611
_ .EA..EAEflEA C. _!ita.,..........
IA... QD ..► t"
2.2.-"D°:-' N W W .a s C -.1,)-+N) C
Z `I-4(A- N N CJD O�N .0P0' p 0-,0 0)0 01 N `C
42 c N A$ W--�to 0)-(00):, N W--►N Cat A O m
ill �� CJ10000A00 Z N111.64 CO A(0 O -►ODA WCJtWyW '
O
ti `+ 0-L C O NN
boi, to
•
i
v ,G oo to-.011-. 00 almoot..)
n O UCJOO)OAWO
NCD0.
NV010)m0)0
NNN���EA c1 C _a..�..a `O
OA C VC)') -gy9. m-'W `;. .r.;e, 000)CAAW r+
oD 0 0
• 4 ,,,, .
Z NNWN EA N9 EA0
iliN Oa iii_....< - .- ,,,.
___ d
��* 1 A0_) ((A'�)Ut , = y O O�D CA Z1 -Nt0CA 0) .
CD-iiiiii OO ivO-Do ? � � ! 1 ... er —..00VJt.N .NACWJt
al g
T (�
C11 a X N N NEA.EA z - 0 W • M a d _ O
N VOWCni..). �� .g. - ..0 V.CJ1N-�<
�_► O - ,,,-�OAppppA V��pp-�ODONV
✓ - < 000ONA00 Ti N a OODVWU10DVS
ca amil
ig N C NNNN��EAEAO D �$ , O +� _
_, m
m CD v it- jp _ `= -'N co WNC�
iii, So�00000000 E ? iCn w —.1 Cn 3
'f_i
m m m
a. › to,. N . (.... 6.,mNN0 ?
D
WOOW o,czi • 4 :,; -. CS) N -.4 0_'QAAW-L? W
; (pOONO O 8k)'8 '-`2@ Np�
ODAOA-�N
t1 ,.o < _ -
fie,)
ill
bd
T .
AJ '►
O K ovOO�OVFrm d °D -�
= OOAoN00 mA5,..pwor.)
as D
_ ^ t ER EA EA Efl Eft EA '' m
�� inm Q7
O �at-co-Loco�p mp�NCn - ii 0 0 �� CAA-�n
m -mei - 00000WP0 K 51WOD-+VNO
fg-�. O --� 1 . ! --i
O I W W W Efl Efi EfD - Off' >
-. ii.1.7
D /' J� , COr1w01mCNJ1N)OD , mCOJtoo 00D�D1
000 0010
. . .
__,
c
❑ ❑ ❑ •■ ❑ ❑ ® © c
1f11 EA Efi Efl ETH El9 Ef) S-'
N N N N .� ? W N..a..a.a N _a_ A)
8 8 8 pp �' CS (O cCOD r_ bp„....„
d tD O ; OpNO-'tAJ1mO�p,G `F
(.....„0,.
) 0)A - 0,.
3 r3 . . , . �000001m0 I
S S 0 S po (0 (0 1180 —
A W N --� S CO . -4 • #
w—,„).,,,--_.
❑ D © ■ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ A g
0(0 04:.01m N N N N -. -. .- A m0mVODANO
I ii . 0)W Om A+CAJN o O p O cO ( 2 g o OD A Cp W A m JI
O�NOCJ -,/-L
(0
—W W N.....-.O O 8 8 O 00 CD CD CO ...►"
A o N CO P-'LW g. A W N -► O CD Co --4 W N W'OD CA A-,
O
j -Co mAN OOWN
MM.,INON N0DNA -C-C) J1
O C11 O N N A m 0 / O O A W_W V_m
oN;
aux0, tit \ ()
p a�L� 11000 N. La Canada Dr.
om,-1"
♦; Oro Valley, Arizona 85737
Phone (520) 229-4900 FAX (520) 797-2616
DANIEL G. SHARP,Chief of Police , Kr4K WWW.ovpd.org
24,
0NDE Dig
ORO VALLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT
"INTEGRITY, PRIDE, EXCELLENCE"
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor Loomis & Oro Valley Council
FROM: ,y`ky hief Daniel G. Sharp
I��:
REF: December 2003 Statistics
DATE: January 6, 2004
Please find attached the statistics for the Oro Valley Police Department for
December 2003 and the Citation/Warning total for the previous month.
It : CO 00 0 0 * D D 70 "o X * 0 >
< < < < 71 X > > 5 � o0 rC >
-I
" DC CD tCI '% CO E < o = O -I Wo
N
a
CD at, 0_ "t1 13 13 11 cl) "4- = 4) 3 '''''',2. a r: g) g 3 4. - c 6 0 r.
O -- ° v ° 0 0 u) 0 �° D ow 0 a 0J su CD r.l. CD CD N
-' A, c o - cD D) -• co --i 2) (D u) ig o , Fir
W N O O
°' la) = = Dom =1 m v to y c�D N N 0P:i
< C. �D O cn C) CD 0 * cn �_ O
O ° n cD .-
E as 2 � a � n D D N y
cD o.cp U)
on
y _ r
CD C2- o
trn
Cr NC) ° till
r°. - CD Co N w w w N o D
< _ CO N (31 -� 00 CO CO CO (31 N .p CO �1 r'
• CD - tri 41. -1 -L CD . O 00 -1 N Co CO N •P 00 CO Co
O n Cn y CA CW - (31 Cn Co O _01 _C31 _Co 0 CA CO Co Co 0 CO _O 0 N _CO �1 _.4. _
O3 O Q) *t
rt O. O
• ,�. D
W -' � t.*
V) n Cn 0 --, N N N O -, 01 -� Z
4 O :A N) 01 -A .A - CO -.1 Co -A N O N) -A N 0) CO N) -A O
0 O 01 -A 0) - CO CO N) CD CO 0) -A 00 -.1 W N -.1 O O - O N O CO N
p n
(,) E' O03 i111 tt
O 4" W Co
1 -A �. .A - - N -A
0)• O 3 00 01 -A N C) '-1 W -A -A 00 -,- CO -.1 CO CA) -A O Ca) O N 00 -A 01 Co N -.1
t:
-13 ......- W till
FE 3 _ D
-�
C) O co -, CO C3) 0)3Co 0) GJ -A N N N CO O CO - -� - -A 01
-� O CO O C3) N) 01 Ca) CO N -.1 - N) -A -.1 -� - O O N
-.1 0) Co W -A -.1 -A
Ci DJ PZ
CD �-
CT n
,.< cr) > *Ii
0) OCO Nw
4
3 O N N) co O O -- 0) N) Co -A -A N) N) CO CA) Co -' N -A CA)
< 01 C31 0) W O O 01 0) CD CO O 00 -A O N CA) 0) CA) CO O O -.1 N) 01 - CO 00til
(7
ill
a) -A W Co N -, 01 CA) -A - N N C") "'C
3 co 0o -. C31 (3) N) 4N. W 0) CO -A -A N) -A O -1 -A -- - N) 0) CO
_, U1 --- 0) O C3) -, CO 0) 0) -.1 0) N C31 -• N N) -A. -.1 Co O CO 01 -� 01 O CO O
°:O
N -, C ti*
O W W _,
O 01 N O -A N W CO -A - N Z M■■■�
-A CO -, -_, N O CD CD CO 0) CA) N) W CO -.1 CO - _, N) 01 -Si
01 01 - 01 O CO C31 -A N) �1 CO - CO CO 00 O CO -.1 CO O CA) 0) 01 Cfl -.1 0) O ^
1
L
ci,..) _ - C
CC) W N NN.) - . 0) - W Co -� - N N) -� 01 O r
O 01 -�(,..) N) W -A CO 01 CD O -NP 01 Com) 0) O 0) 01 001 U1 N O 01 0) N) 01 N -1 O
- em)
Dy
W C **
W
--,4W � -.1 � N N) CO -� � N � .� -A. -A Co ...,10
W Co N) N) N O C3) -.1 01 0) -- W N -A O 0)
01 Co C11 W CA) 01 C)) -A 0) 01 CO 00 -A - 0) CO CO U1 W O - 0) -.1 -, -.1 0) -
y
N N) W C/)
W -A -� � � N) N) -.1r7'1 Cr) -, N -A CO -A 01 01 01 01 -A C.) N) N 01 O O ---- --A N) CC.71 �1 O V 1
O -� N W C3) CJ1 CO -1 -.1 -, CO N) -A CO CJ1 CO 01 N) O Ca) CO W N - O CA) 13
O4
0) n
-�
CWS Oho N CO N --AN� -A 01 01 CO 01 -A N -A Co CO -.1 - _, N 01 -A 0) 4
-' 00 C3) Co 01 CO CP 01 O 0) 00 CD O N N) Co 00 01 N) O 01 -.1 N -A W -A -A
O P:H
-A - W --• N < `�
W -A -� O N) �1 Co0 -A -A► N) 0) �1 Co -� -., N �A Co
- CCD CO 01 -A CO 01 0) O N -.1 C31 O 0) -A - CA) O CO O W O N N W CJ1 -A
-v v
(1) 01 * * rn
O W 01
N CO - N * * - C)) N) 01 001 -- CA) -- N) N -A W 01 -.1 )J Co 01 00
W 01 W O --A Co O CA) 0) -.1 -A -A -.1 _CO CA) -A 01 0 -1 _N) 01 - _CO CX)
.
...I > r -o rn n cn m Cl) x r � rn C 0 rn z N 0
p r � > fJ = rn > � rnv Z In n _ � O c rn �
r' -1 c r r -� rn rn T rn 7o v Z
_, rn T p c r
X Z oo itii X cn G7 < v rn X -+ > * 0
n = z 0 rn rn rr rn G1 = O z cn cn 7i z rn O
rn11) x O Z cn -I -I Z --I I O cn r_ > C) O p C�
-• n I rn O < -I A)
O Et
< OFii- O GI Z z p r. 0
Z rn < r O 0
N n Or Z � r � -
-I > -I -I v CO rn < p > > cn
0 p - N
Z p Z < O 0
Cn Z rn rZ 0
CO v CA
-) z
O
Z
z
O 4
O
-1
__x 0 y
� W W - N --x W O -� 00 01 O
CD -p -, - 01 01 O O N) 01 -P O N) CO -,i CO N -.1 r
O 01 -1 N) -P W N -CO -CO --.1O O -.1 N CP _CO N CO -,1O
C-
> OO W - N z tZ
N) 0 - ..._1 - N) - -- CO CO -P
- -P N N 01 -.1 CO N CO W 00 C)) N CO - O N)
M
CO N) -1 -1 CO trn
CO W N -'• CO N) 0 -�
COpCO -- 01 01 COO CO -1 O 01 CO CO 01 N CO W O O r
y �
tiN gO
> �C
- N --, W U1 -� CO O W N N)
- O -- 00 4 N O 01 CO O -� - N -P -.1 N N -� CC
co N) � _, Q W X
W -
O -.1 - 01 �1 44 O _- - o (0 O - rn 0) -P O CO n 1
**
y g *-i tT1
W - N M--�
› t..
W WP _, 0) - 0) C)) N -� CO C)) O N)
000 O W CO �1 CO CO 4 N - -A, -P O - 4 N Com) tt
C-
C 11;
O
N _, _, Z
CO) -A. CO --, N -- N 00 - 00 01 CO C
COCA P:
CO W CO C.1 -.1 --.1N - -
-.1 x CO W CO CO .P O P
L
C
N _, _, r tt
oho .P co _, - N) p - -.1 -1 CO
U1 - O N -.1 CO 01 01 00 N 01 -.1 -P N 00 � N 01
O
> t*
r
N) __.1. - O
CO N) CO -, N) W --, CO 4 CO
CO O N N 3 N) 00 -P CO CO CO -P _-.I 00 N -.1 N CO �■■.3
cn O
N) - _' 11
CO ,., - N - N) -.I --, 01 --
CO 01 N - N W O CO CO -- -P N -P 0) N 00 O O N
0
CO .�. - - 0 n
CO -, - -- N W CO N) -A►
CO �1 -- - � W W 01 -.1 - 01 N N CO -P O O 00
Z
O
W -- N N) <
CO - - p �. - - W CO N O -,. -P W
-.1 CO -- -P CO -� -.1 -� N) 01 CO O W N N
v
rn
0
O _ - - - - - -
s
0 ozzo v
CD
< C CD D C) 3
cr
A v FT,= 0
< o 0 o N
o• O O 0
0
C --) Cos)
3 Et
O 0
5
D
0
a)
—
coIv 0-1
o o -„ -p
o 0 - 00 N)
O'
O
O al o N —
o o 01 00 0.)
70
-0 O
D
✓ 1 -"
CD .p, N
o o CO O
0
1 O.
sil
= ._
•
C N
N
_ O Oo O -p CA)
0 00 CJS C.)
cn
-0
N
O 0.
`<
— N -N O -p
o W W 0
oo o p
-10
O'
O O 01
0 0 0 0 0
O.
r=+
0)
-, N _, N) 0)
O o Com) 00
1
O�
r+
N N
- . O
o o CO CO 00
7)
DJ
Co
CD
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: January 21, 2004
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL
FROM: William A. Jansen, P.E., Town Engineer
SUBJECT: Establishment of a new CIP Designer position
Summary:
This is a request to establish a new position in the Department of Public Works that would
be assigned to manage that portion of the Townwide CIP program that involves capital
improvements. In previous years, various CIP projects have been approved in the Town's
annual budget that were funded, but could not be accomplished within the available funds.
This has resulted in requests to the Town Council for additional funds, sometimes in excess
of 100% of the original project estimate. It is felt that the establishment of the CIP Designer
position would insure that project budget requests would be in line with actual anticipated
project costs. In recent years, the Town has had several small CIP projects where the
outside design costs were almost 50% of the construction costs. An example is the new
police parking lot. The construction cost was $169,000. and the initial outside engineering
fee was $69,000. This project was designed in-house at a substantial savings to the Town.
The existing and project work load for the DPW engineering division is such that the CIP
responsibility cannot be taken on without the additional position. The Community
Development Director and the Chief of Police support this request.
If this position is approved, the following would be the functions of this position.
1. Department scope of work for a CIP capital project would be submitted for
scoping and cost estimating at least 2 months prior to the start of the CIP
budget cycle.
2. Upon completion of the scoping/estimating process, the project information
would be provided to the requesting department for their submission in the
annual CIP budget cycle. At this time, the requesting department would be
advised if the project can be accomplished in-house or if it would require an
outside consultant.
3. After approval in the CIP budget process, the CIP designer would then be
expected to design the project if within his/her expertise or request technical
assistance from the DPW engineering division for design. It is anticipated
that most of the CIP projects would be designed in-house. Those that cannot
be done in-house, an outside consultant will be assigned.
4. After design completion and certification of available funds, the CIP Designer
would bid and manage the construction project. Upon completion, project
control would shift to the appropriate department.
1
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 2
5. During all phases of the project, the CIP designer is expected to coordinate
with the requesting department to insure that the completed project meets the
desired needs of the requesting department.
The estimated costs of this position are shown below;
1. Position Classification: Civil Engineering Designer salary grade 42
2. Estimated Salary: $45,000.00
3. Fringes and benefits (30%) $13,500.00
4. Computer, software and office equipment: $ 5,000.00
5. Employee would use a Town pool vehicle and would have an office with the
engineering division presently at Calle Concordia.
6. Funding for this position would be from the Town's General Fund.
Financial Impact:
The estimated annual cost for this position is $58,500. and an initial equipment cost of
$5,000. Funds for this new position would come from the Town's General Fund
contingency reserve.
SUGGESTED MOTION: The Town Council may wish to consider one of the following
motions.
I move to amend the Town's Highway Fund FY 03/04 Budget by transferring $34,250.
from the General Fund contingency reserve to provide additional funding for the CIP
Designer position.
OR
move to
? \ j-----1 .
Department Head\-----
/7 ) -- )
(--Afra cil, al,---
Finance Director
...7,—: / —
7 , 4
i /ii,e("4" ,,, „..----
L.j
Town Manager
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
JOB TITLE: CIVIL ENGINEER DESIGNER
JOB CODE: 3231
JOB GRADE: 42
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS
FLSA: EXEMPT / FULL-TIME
REVISED: 9/01
DISTINGUISHING FEATURES OF WORK
Provides para-professional civil engineering design and engineering plan review for the
Engineering Division of the Public Works Department.
EXAMPLES OF WORK PERFORMED
(Any one position may not include all of the duties listed, nor do the listed examples include all
tasks which may be found or required to be performed in this position.)
■ Reviews improvement plans and grading plans for both Public Works & private
improvements for compliance with Town of Oro Valley subdivision streets, floodplain
standards, Town Code, AASHTO, ADOT guidelines and Engineering Practices.
■ Checks improvement plans for compliance with project's approved soil, hydrology, and
traffic reports.
■ Set meetings with Developers and Engineers to discuss the project issues.
■ Coordinates improvement plan review with engineering firms, P & Z, O.V.W.U., and other
Town departments.
■ Perform quantity calculations for Capital Improvement Projects.
■ Provides discussion with engineers regarding subdivision street standards and improvement
plan requirements.
■ Perform in-house design for minor Capital Improvement Projects.
■ Assists with Development Review process.
■ Ensures that approved Hydrology & Traffic Reports conform to the improvement plans.
■ Reviews plans for conflicts with sight visibility requirements.
■ Responds to citizens' inquiries.
■ Prepares drawings for standard details and typical sections.
■ Assists with information transfer to the GIS system.
1
■ Provides restoration bond calculations.
■ Perform construction inspection for Capital Improvement Projects.
■ Review Striping and Signage Plans
■ Maintains improvement plan check-in records and review fee billing information.
■ Assist with the enforcement of Town standard to ensure project compliance.
■ Performs other duties as assigned by the Engineering Division Manager.
■ Perform review of Capital Improvement Projects.
REQUIRED KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS, AND ABILITIES
Working knowledge of theory and practice of Civil Engineering Design, Construction, and
Surveying.
Working knowledge of AASHTO, ADOT & FEMA Design Guidelines.
Working knowledge of ADOT, MUTCD & Pima County Signage & Striping Guidelines.
Ability to use IBM compatible computer systems and software, and be familiar with AUTOCAD,
MS-Word, Flow Master, HEC1 & HEC2, Culvert Master & HCS-3.1.
Familiar with ADOT Traffic Impact Report Preparation Guidelines.
Familiar with ADOT, COT, Drainage Manual Procedures.
Ability to use surveying equipment and instruments.
Ability to prepare, design and check improvement plans.
Working knowledge of Hydrology & Hydraulics.
Working knowledge of Pima County/COT Specifications, ADOT 2000 Specifications & all ADOT
Standard Manuals.
Ability to communicate effectively verbally and in writing.
Ability to develop and maintain effective working relationships with associate staff, contractors,
developers, citizen groups and the public at large.
DESIRABLE EXPERIENCE AND TRAINING
At least five (5) years of para-professional civil engineering experience or a Civil Engineering
Degree from an accredited university.
2
EIT certificate is preferred.
At least two (2) years of para-profession civil engineering experience, required.
Any combination of civil engineering education plus experience which cumulatively yields a
minimum of six years.
This job description is intended to indicate the basic nature of the position(s) allocated to this class and examples of
typical duties that may be assigned. It does not imply that all positions within this class will perform all the duties
listed, nor does it attempt to list all possible duties that may be assigned.
This job description does not constitute an employment agreement between the employer and employee and is
subject to change by the employer as the needs of the employer and requirements of the job change.
Created/Revised by Date Department Head Date
Town Manager Date Human Resources Date
3
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: January 21, 2004
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL
FROM: David Ruiz, Engineering Division Administrator
SUBJECT: Report on Status of Emergency Drilling of Well E-7A
SUMMARY:
Pursuant to Section 3-4-6 of the Oro Valley Town Code, this communication fulfills the Authorized
Emergency Procurement obligation to provide a full written report.
On December 29, 2003, a formal request to use the "Emergency Procurement" process to change order our
existing contract with Arizona Beeman Drilling, Project No. OV20-03-03, to drill a second well was
approved. The reason we requested the change order was because the original well drilled by Arizona
Beeman Drilling could not sustain more than 50 gallons per minute and cannot be used to supply potable
water for this upcoming peak summer demand. Although this second well will not be equipped in time to
meet the beginning of the 2004 peak summer demand, it will be completed in time to provide needed supply
towards the end of the peak summer demand.
Arizona Beeman Drilling began drilling the well on January 19, 2004 and is scheduled to be finished March
8, 2004.
FISCAL IMPACT: The cost to complete the drilling of Well E-7A is estimated to be $221,295.00.
Funds are identified in the 2003-2004 Budget. Final invoices had not been
received at the time of this writing. After the completion of the well drilling, a
final project report will be prepared and submitted to Mayor & Council.
RECOMMENDATIONS: None required.
ATTACHMENTS: Request for and authorizing to proceed with emergency procedures.
Cif/ '
Engineering Div.;.-on Administrator
0-,........, , 4-/-
Water Utility Director
7 i/
Town Manager
ti
ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY
MEMORANDUM
TO: Chuck Sweet, Town Manager
FROM: Alan Forrest, Water Utility Director
DATE: December 24, 2003
SUBJECT: Emergency Well Drilling
CC: David Ruiz, Engineering Division Administrator
Pursuant to our conversation regarding the above referenced subject, I am submitting this memo
as a formal request to use the "Emergency Procurement" process to change order our existing
contract with Arizona Beeman Drilling, Project No. OV20-03-03, to drill a second well. The
following are the reasons we feel the request is justified:
1. Well E-7B, recently drilled by subject contract, was projected to supply potable water for
this coming summer, making up a portion of our declining groundwater supply.
2. To our surprise and disappointment, the well could not sustain more than 50 gallons per
minute and will not be used at this time. The well will be capped and used as a monitor
well until such time that methods for developing well capacities improve.
3. Our need has intensified and we realize we have to look at alternative methods of
expediting the replacement of the projected supply from subject well.
4. The contract cost for drilling subject well was $229,295.00, an excellent cost compared to
the last well that was dilled in fiscal year 2001-2002, also by Arizona Beeman, in the
amount $287,348.90
5. We have approached the contractor and asked if the Town were able to approve a change
order to subject contract to drill another well, would they be able to offer us a discounted
cost.
6. The contractor has offered us a discounted cost in the amount of$221,295.00, $8,000.00
below his original cost.
7. We feel this is an excellent proposal and opportunity to drill a second well at an
outstanding cost.
8. Attached please find the cost proposal from subject contractor and a map showing the
location of the requested well drilling.
Based on the information above and in accordance with the Town of Oro Valley's S.O.P. No. 2,
authorization by Mayor Loomis is requested for emergency procurement for drilling a new well.
Please advise staff when authorization has been approved. Should you have any questions in this
regard, please call me at 229-5010.
y ,
MEMORANDUM
TO: PAUL H. LOOMIS, MAYOR
FROM: CHUCK SWEET, TOWN MANAGER
DATE: December 24, 2004
SUBJECT: Town Code Section 3-4-6 Emergency Purchases
Drilling a New Well
Please see the attached information from the Water Utility Director regarding the request to drill
a new well.
Town Code Section 3-4-6 (Emergency Purchases) requires your authorization to the purchasing
Agent (Town Manager) "to purchase and secure services without complying with the
procedures of this article (Purchasing). I request your authorization to proceed with the
necessary emergency services to drill a new replacement well. I will deliver a verbal report to
the Town Council at the regular Town Council meeting of January 7, 2004 as required by
Section 3-4-6 of the Town Code. A full written report shall be submitted to the Council at their
meeting on
January 21, 2004.
Your signature below will authorize these emergency purchases.
CHUCK S EET
TOWN MANAGER
Attachment (1)
Approved: Date: /-7/9/0.3
Mayor Paul H. Loomis
11 . 1
•-+�....,.-,mow..•..-_-_..�__•„ti_ r•_T _-.....-.-.,..__..................
1ST AV `
t i ,
i
•
I t
i Ii I • l � '
, ....„ ,te ,.....„..„ ®
" •t
I
,
i
i
1 •
i
•
0 01
N z w
7'Y
-
O d . ......._.
i ..
_
4
J
'
• T
'
-1 0 , .
J
i r
" t
r
i •
' > .„,..
•
�r It { I. i !
tI
_.
II
•
•
r
•
•
r, •i a
-i---,5......,, _ t r I 1' ' ..f
•
�.
f
,'�...�-.�! � ...,J_ri•`,w....�„r„L��.•__.`Y.,..um._u.,,..,,vtiy'....i:�,..._.,....yn•-r,a. �.�._w.__4� t-}'T'•�- .••'
•
rn rn ti
l
tt
0
!..! > ! 1/ '''' CI:) i
•
,
•
•, 0 -a .Z ,
•
. i,* xi .
••
...._..._....... 1
rn ;33 ...0
0
:- o..._.,........_.... ,
-..., ir-- r A
.4 _._._........... ..........______._......__..
,..,.................. > !r" --
, W*4 „„, ORACLE •
,.! 'Nit-ii 1111 a-it sta-11-111"sl'Illarrats iw ,m
._. , 0)
..••, *awl
_.... iv
. .
..
_..
.___.
..
....
, , ........ •
_ - ,,,,,,,
....,
ir 4 e,.. s,
.
..._ .,... N i, .
• 1i
, 4-
_• J.,--4..
-p • 1./... 4 • .,..war..
•
0 I ,,
mu
I it I r 1 (.
I ,
,r
dr•K' 3
i l
Iiii 0.) . .''.
i Z ii 0
0IA: :;.:: rn
•
s
0
Y
,44tiloota
BEEMAN DRILLING
A A orex Investments, LLC Company'
P.O.Box 3370 • Apache Junction,AZ 85217(48`, ;
983 Fj A • FAX(480)983-4816 �yh': '_ `:.
-,,G
_ 4
FAX TRANSMISSION
DATE: December 2, 2003
PHONE: 1-520-229-5023
FAX: 1-520-229-5029
Total number of pages including this page: 2
TO: David Ruiz
COMPANY: Town of Oro Valley Water Utilities
FROM: Susan Cooper
SUBJECT: Quote for 2"d Water Well to be authorized on a Change Order-
MEMO:
Dave,
verysharpon the first quote.' However,in order to further assist the
The pencil was
Town of Oro
Valley,Item 1. Mobilization and demobilization has been reduced by
$8,000.00 as wanP romised to you when our equipment was still there.
quote included
in this is the water for construction of the 2 well. That will be
the responsibility of the City. Looking forward to hearing from you.
Susan
134 1 O.)td West Highway • Apache.Junction.A7. 85219
.. .
. - ,...-
iteptigeet ,.,
(4,
BEEMAN DRILLING
A Mortar isvalmosts, LLe Company
-------.......-...-........._
P.O.Box 3370 f.Apach*Jusetios,AZ$5217
,.. - , , ...',.• •: :'...•
(480)9133-2512 0 FAX(4100)904116 ESTIMATE . • , , ., . . ; .4. ..
4 ,.... . . ...,-. •
Dp.4.:Lui:..'..-„, •;.f.-• „.-. ;f.'%I.,.
NAMErA6DRESS
\--
. . . . .
. . . . '•'`.(t''0.'1: ' ''s'-I' 4' ...-'I.:.•'....".:
DATE ---7-7• . .
.____..........._.. .•-....-.........---
. ____. . . _.._...-. .......mr it•,,,,,........,.. ..............••..........
• .. David R.niz
. .1.bwii,of Ott.Valley Water Utility . • 8/29/2003 148
: .• 11000,Noit41..a Canada Drive . . . •_. .._ ,. . . ._, -
Oro Valley,Arizona 85737P.O. NO. , PROJECT
• CC; Buck Sehinidt/Brown&CakIwc11 . ._........„.._..••....._. .
.
OV-20-93-03 • • 2nd Well •
. . •
. ,_______-___ ____ ____..• ,____-___, ...., . . _____
- . ITEM. .. • ' DESpRIPTION .. . QTY UNIT COST • 'TOTAL .
. ---- • ___-,
• MobiDeniOb . .. • .1.•Mob/danoti drill rig kequipment. • I LS 19,106.00• • 19,106.00T
Surface Case •• 2. Surface casing construction.. . 40 LF • 250.00 . ' 10;000.00T
.'• . Pilot Hole • 3.. Drill pilot hole . . 751 LF• 55.00 . ,. • 42,955.00T
.
• Rom • . •,4.. Ream bdrehole to 26-inch, • • , • ' 781 LF 25.00: '19,525.001,
Logging 1 .• 5. Conduct geophysical logging • . , I •LS 4,600.00. .. . 4,600:001
• Casing • 6. Furnish&install 16-inch diameta well . 372 Li' .27.(X) 1.0,044.POT
casing, . .. • . . .
• .
• • Screen , . • 7. Furnish&install 16-inch diameter well 440 II 54.00 • 23,760.00T
•
•• • , sawn. • • .• . .
.• '' 'Silica Sand. , • 8. Furnish 4.instill.silice sand filter pack , • • 98 TN 270.00. .. 26,460.00T
• .* Bentonite • ' • 9.•Furnish&install bentonite seal. . . . • 37 CF 15.00 555.00T
.. • FormationStab 10. Furnish&install formation .stabilizer(pca . 30 TN . 99.00 . . 2,700,00T•
' -
gravel•&bentonite material) • - , . .
' • .:Ce'rneiit '.' . ' . , 11..FUrnishi insuill cement grout seal, . 16 CY 24500. • 1,920:00T•
-
••••• Air/La Wal'a. •.• ; 12. Airlift Swab&development• • . 75 HR • 25000 . . , .1.8750.60T
• •• . .--Weiltievelop 13. Purop/sarge development • • - , • - •• ' 12. HR • 175.00 . 2;100.00T
• .,:Plumbrit• 14.• Plumbness&Alignment test( ompleted •' : ,1 LS . 1,200.00 : .. .•' ' 1,200.00T..
. :.• . Well) •
. . . . . .
. • • - .
• "Video . .•15. Final Well video. • • • • • •• 1 LS 900.00 . 900.00T
• • •' l'iirn0 Test • . 16. Furnish,install/removetestpimp*, • ' 1 LS 8,800.00 •'• • s•• :8,800.001
. • Monitoring,&associated eqUiprnent: •• •
.
•• • Test.Pcriod. .. 17. Pump Test Period • .
. . • 34 1-IR 175.00 • • . 5,950.00T •
• • . Well Abandonment • .. •
.
• • .
• Logging ' A.Conduct video Log • . .
.• 1 LS .• 900.00. • • : 900:00T
. t ' Knifing - • .. . B. Mills Knife casing(10.-30 ft.&350-450.fl... 120 I)' 45.00• .. .5,400,9OT .
bls.). ' ,
• .
. •'• .Remo'val • • C.. Remove 10 feet of easing. 1 LS 500.00 • 500.00T
. •. c.etneint s • D. Furnish&install cement seal.• • . . •720 I..F . 3.50 •• 2,520.00T
. . . ... 19. Well Production Evaluation ,
. . .
Spinner Test. .. A. Spinnci Flow Meter.Survey . . ' 1 LS 750.00 •• .,•• . 750.00
. . Pun*Test i B. Pupping test paiod. ' . 8 HR 175.00 , ••. 1,400.00T •
Test Pump C. Reset test pump • , • . 1 Ls s-,5op.00. • . .. .1,500.001
. . . . Sub Total • .. . • . 241,295.00
. .
. •
. .. . •
• •• . : Additional Costs Watcr to be siippliod by City of Ore Valley ' • .0:00:' .• • .• .' . .: ' •
. .
•• • , • • • . • , • . . ,
, .
. . . . •,:. • • . • • Subject to.Pirna,County&City of Oro Valley . .
• • .. . •• • •• • Sales tax included in.bid. . .
, .
. . . .
• 0.00.. . •0.00 •
. ,. . .
. . .. .
. • • . . • . • . . . . .
. . . .
.. ... ...i...J.06 -Idedir,:bid p---7.- -..'---. -7---7.- . .---7- • . . .[ 1 S221,295.00 •.TOTAL . - • - -
. .T...... cop.tn.q.,73 E..10..i.ipits a Mstimptions Apply .„ • • ' .
• ,• ... • .
. .
.. . . . .
. . . . . . .
. . .. . .
•• • . .
.. '
. . .
. . .. ,. . . . .
. . . .
. . .
• •
. , .. . .
. • . . . . • . .. . .
. ...
.. . . . . . . .
• • . • • - . . ., 1341 :Old West Highway ••Apache Junction, AZ 85219 ..... . ., . .
.. .. . .
. . . .
. , • .
• . , .
. .
. . . .
. . .
. .
.. .. . . . . . .
.. .. ..
. . ..
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: January 21, 2004
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & TOWN COUNCIL
FROM: Chuck Sweet, Town Manager
SUBJ: RESOLUTION NO. (R) 04 -03 ; ADOPTION OF APPENDIX "B" -
AMENDED SUPPLELMENTING THE TOWN COUNCIL
PARLIAMENTARY RULES AND CODE OF CONDUCT BY CLARIFING
THE APPOINTMENT PROCESS FOR TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
VOLUNTEERS TO BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, COMMITTEES,
ADVISORY BOARDS, AND TASK FORCES
SUMMARY:
At the November 20, 2002 Town Council Meeting, Appendix B' to the Town Council
Parliamentary Rules and Code of Conduct ("Rules") referencing the appointment policy
of Town of Oro Valley volunteers to Boards, Commissions, Committees, and Task
Forces ("Boards" collectively) was adopted. Since then the Rules were supplemented
by Appendix C which related specifically to the implementation of term limits to current
volunteers.
The overall appointment process has been in effect for over a year and requires a few
clarifications. Please see the attached amended version of Appendix "B."
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution No. (R) 04 -03 adopting Appendix "B" - Amended which amends the
Town Council Parliamentary Rules and Code of Conduct in reference to a clarification of
the appointment policy of Town of Oro Valley volunteers to Boards, Commissions,
Committees, Advisory Boards, and Task Forces
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the recently adopted appointment policy of Town of Oro Valley
volunteers to Boards, Commissions, Committees, Advisory Boards, and Task Forces,
be clarified.
MOTION:
I move to adopt Resolution No. (R) 04- 03 which supplements the Town Council
Parliamentary Rules and Code of Conduct with Appendix "B" Amended clarifying the
recently adopted appointment policies for all current Town of Oro Valley volunteers to
Boards, Commissions, Committees, Advisory Boards, and Task Forces.
.,C)tdhcaed"
Chuck Sweet
Town Manager
RESOLUTION NO. (R) 04 - 03
A RESOLUTION SUPPLEMENTING THE REVISED TOWN COUNCIL
PARLIAMENTARY RULES & PROCEDURES AND CODE OF
CONDUCT OF THE ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL BY ADDING
"APPENDIX B - AMENDED," REFERENCING THE CLARIFICATION
OF THE APPOINTMENT PROCESS OF TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
VOLUNTEERS TO BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, COMMITTEES,
ADVISORY BOARDS, AND TASK FORCES.
WHEREAS, on February 7, 1996, the Council originally adopted the Town
Council Policies & Procedures, which were created for use by the Council to set
standards and usual procedures for the Council; and
WHEREAS, on February 16, 2000, the Council re-enacted the Town Council
Policies & Procedures by resolution in order to revise and/or supplement the document
from time to time; and
WHEREAS, on September 19, 2001, the Town Council Policies & Procedures
was revised and re-titled as the"Town Council Parliamentary Rules & Procedures and
Code of Conduct;" and
WHEREAS, the current "Town Council Parliamentary Rules & Procedures and
Code of Conduct" does not include procedures relating to the appointment process of
Town of Oro Valley volunteers to Boards, Commissions, Committees, Advisory Boards,
and Task Forces ("Boards, collectively); and
WHEREAS, Appendix B - Amended to the "Town Council Parliamentary Rules
& Procedures and Code of Conduct," attached hereto reflects the clarified procedures
surrounding the appointment process to Boards; and
WHEREAS,the Council has determined that the revised and supplemented
"Town Council Parliamentary Rules & Procedures and Code of Conduct" is just and
appropriate, and is found to be in the interest of the Town.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of
Oro Valley, Arizona that the adoption of the revised and supplemented"Town Council
Parliamentary Rules &Procedures and Code of Conduct,"is hereby approved.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by Mayor and Town Council this 21st day of January 2004.
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
Paul H. Loomis, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Mark Langlitz, Town Attorney
APPENDIX "B" - amended
APPOINTMENT PROCESS
OF TOWN OF ORO VALLEY VOLUNTEERS
TO
BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, COMMITTEES,
ADVISORY BOARDS,AND TASK FORCES
In accordance with Oro Valley Town Code Section 2-4-8, the Mayor and Council may
create any Town Board, Commission, Committee, ADVISORY BOARDS, or Task Force
("Board"), standing or special, as it deems necessary. Therefore, the process surrounding
appointments to a Board should be streamlined in order to facilitate a quick and courteous
appointment as follows:
Advertising: post in newspaper, Town web page, and Town Hall
Application: volunteers must complete an application to be considered for appointment
to a Board, which is submitted to the Town Clerk. If the volunteer is not selected, the
application remains in a database for 2 years in which is reviewed when any vacancies
occur depending upon interest of the volunteer as stated in the application. Those
members wanting to be considered for reappointment must send a letter to the STAFF
REPRESENTATIVE Board Chairman, Town Clerk, and Town Council indicating their
interest in reappointment and include ANY and information that would supplement their
application which is on file with the Town Clerk.
Interview Committee: FOLLOWING AN interview volunteers OF VOLUNTEER
APPLICATIONS, THE INTERVIEW COMMITTEE MAKES make a determination,
and then forward their recommendation for appointment/reappointment to the Board
before the Mayor& Council for determination at a regular Town Council meeting. The
Interview Committee Panel consists of Council Liaison, Board Chair(or Vice-Chair if
term of the Chair is due to expire), and Department Head(or Division Manager)
responsible for staff support to that particular Board.
Notification:
New Volunteer Recommended for Appointment
Prospective appointee is forwarded a copy of the Council Communication naming
those volunteers recommended for appointment along with a personal letter
notifying the prospective appointee of the Council meeting date at which they
shall be recommended for appointment.
New Volunteer Not Recommended for Appointment
The volunteer not chosen FOR APPOINTMENT is forwarded the Council
Communication naming those volunteers recommended for appointment along
with an explanation that their volunteer application will be kept on file for 2
years.
Parliamentary Rules&Procedures Appendix B;amended Office of the Town Manager 1/7/2004 3:30 PM
Current Volunteer Not Recommended for Reappointment
The volunteer not RECOMMENDED FOR reappointed is forwarded the Council
Communication naming those volunteers recommended for appointment along
with notification from the Council Liaison sitting on the Interview Committee
explaining the decision surrounding the recommendation.
Criteria for Appointment: 1) Availability; 2) Residency of 1 year; and 3) Completion or
commitment to complete the Citizen Planning Institute (if applicable) and other Board
training workshops offered throughout term
Criteria for Reappointment: 1) Minimum Performance and Attendance; 2) Personal
Relations and Participation; and 3) Growth and Improvement, including Board training in
addition to the completion of the Citizen Planning Institute (if applicable) within the
volunteer's 2-year term
Terms: appointments shall be made for 2-year terms (OR 3-YEAR TERMS WHEN
APPLICABLE), and volunteer shall continue service until re-appointed or replaced.
UPON SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OF ONE TERM (SEE EVALUATION
PROCESS), THE VOLUNTEER MAY BE CONSIDERED FOR RE-APPOINTMENT
WITHOUT A FORMAL INTERVIEW WITH THE INTERVIEW COMMITTEE
PANEL. IF THE VOLUNTEER DOES NOT WISH TO BE CONSIDERED FOR RE-
APPOINTMENT, THE POSITION BECOMES OPEN TO OTHER APPLICANTS.
Term Limits: no volunteer shall serve more than 2 consecutive TERMS, EITHER 2-year
terms (4 consecutive year maximum) OR 3-YEAR TERMS (6 CONSECUTIVE YEARS
MAXIMUM) DEPENDING UPON THE BOARD. and ONCE A volunteer has
completed the maximum number of terms on a Board the volunteer may not be eligible
for appointment to that Board for a period of 1 year following completion of their term
Concurrent Office: no volunteer shall serve on more than one standing Board at any
time. A STANDING BOARD IS THAT BOARD APPOINTED BY THE COUNCIL
FOR AN UNSPECIFIED DURATION AND HAS REGULARLY SCHEDULED
MEETINGS.
Town Employee: Town Employees shall not serve on any standing Board with the
exception of the Grievance Review Board
Attendance: a vacancy shall be deemed to have occurred upon three (3) consecutive
unexcused absences, or as determined by the individual Board bylaws
Evaluation Process: Chair or Vice-Chair, depending on whose term is set to expire, shall
submit to the Council Liaison a one (1)page evaluation of a volunteer's performance
during their term at least sixty(60) days prior to the expiration of that volunteer's term
Parliamentary Rules&Procedures Appendix B;amended Office of the Town Manager 1/7/2004 3:30 PM
Training: training is mandated for all new volunteers and those seeking reappointment.
These individuals shall commit to the completion of a total of eight (8) SIXTEEN (16)
hours of training PER TERM an-au-ally (in addition to the Citizen Planning Institute)
offered by the Town of Oro Valley onsite and/or through outside sources, while the Town
shall commit to providing the logistics and payment of any and all training workshops.
Both Chairs and Vice-Chairs are encouraged to attend an"advanced training" workshop
focusing on meeting management, conflict/dispute resolution, parliamentary procedures,
and Board member coordination offered by the Town. The "advanced training" is open
to all volunteers. FOUR HOUR TRAINING SEMINARS WILL BE OFFERED BI-
ANNUALLY (AT A MINIMUM). EVERY EFFORT WILL BE MADE TO CONDUCT
THE TRAINING SEMINARS IN AUGUST AND IN FEBRUARY.
Parliamentary Rules&Procedures Appendix B;amended Office of the Town Manager 1/7/2004 3:30 PM
1HTOWN OF ORO VALLEY
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: January 21,2004
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL
FROM: Jeff Grant, Human Resources Director
SUBJECT: Resolution (R)04-04 accepting the amended Compensation and Benefits Study, and
approving the use of the new Classification Plan and pay adjustments to the new salary
range minimums effective January 1, 2004.
SUMMARY: On December 8, 2003, the Town Council reviewed the proposed Compensation and Benefits
Study results as presented by the Consultant, Public Sector Personnel Consultants (PSPC). In addition, at that
meeting, the Human Resources Director summarized individual employee concerns which were subject to
ongoing analysis. As a result of that analysis, changes to the consultant's original report have been
recommended and are highlighted in the attachment entitled "Summary of Changes to the Consultant's Report."
As indicated in the summary, other items are still being analyzed and will be finalized and recommended during
the FY 2004-2005 Budget Process.
Those Tables from the Consultants original report that have been affected by the recommended changes have
been revised and are also attached (in some cases only the items that changed have been included).
4s a result, it is recommended that the Town Council accept the Consultant's report with the changes as noted.
.t is further recommended that the new Classification Plan be adopted for use during the FY 2004-2005 Budget
process. (The new Classification Plan retains the use of the current Step Plan for all Police personnel that are
currently covered by the Step Plan.)
As recommended during the December 8, 2003 Study Session (and in recognition of the labor market conditions
which were highlighted by PSPC), it is proposed that individual employees whose current salaries fall below the
minimum of the ranges included with the new Classification Plan receive pay increases to the minimum of their
new ranges effective January 1, 2004.
The other elements of the Consultant's recommendations will be brought back to the Council during the FY
2004-2005 Budget Process (the adoption of an overall compensation policy, including Merit pay, COLA, the
possible adoption of the permanent salary structure, etc.)
FISCAL IMPACT:
As the consultant has suggested, employees who fall below the minimum of their salary ranges as a result of the
adoption of the recommendations should be adjusted to the new range minimum with the adoption of the plan.
This recommendation will cost approximately$25,000 for the balance of FY 2003-2004.
ATTACHMENTS:
Summary of Changes to the Consultant's Report
2. Revised Tables for the Position Classification and FY 2004 Salary Plan.
Page TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
OUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 4
POSSIBLE MOTION:
I move to adopt Resolution (R) 04-04 , accepting the amended Compensation and Benefits Study, and
approving the use of the new Classification Plan and the pay adjustments to the new salary range minimums
effective January 1, 2004.
r..
rf 4
Jeff Grant, Iuman Resources Director
.ter`
Chuck Sweet, Town Manager
RESOLUTION NO. (R) 04 -04
A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY,
ARIZONA ACCEPTING THE AMENDED COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS
STUDY, AND APPROVING THE USE OF THE NEW CLASSIFICATION PLAN
AND PAY ADJUSTMENTS TO THE NEW SALARY RANGE MINIMUMS
EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2004.
WHEREAS the Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley authorized that a Compensation
and Benefits Study be conducted by Public Sector Personnel Consultants during 2003; and
WHEREAS, Public Sector Personnel Consultants completed the Study in compliance with
the original scope of work; and
WHEREAS, it is deemed in the best interest of the Town of Oro Valley to ensure that the
Town of Oro Valley Classification and Compensation plan is consistent with best practices;
and
WHEREAS, it is deemed in the best interests of the Town of Oro Valley and its employees to
ensure that the Compensation Plan is competitive when compared with other similar
jurisdictions within the State of Arizona;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of
Oro Valley that the Compensation and Benefits Study originally prepared by Public Sector
Personnel Consultants, as amended, is hereby accepted, the Classification Plan is approved for
use, and that employees shall be adjusted to their new salary range minimums effective
January 1, 2004.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley,
Arizona this 21st day of January , 2004.
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
Paul H. Loomis, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathryn E. Cuvelier, Town Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Mark J. Langlitz, Town Attorney
Revised Tables for the Position Classification and FY
2004 Salary Plan
(The attached Tables reflect changes to the original
presentation by Public Sector Personnel Consultants.)
,
Town of Oro Valley
Position Classification Plan
Table 2 - Index of Current to Recommended Job Classes
The following are the recommended changes to the Consultant's original submittal:
Current Job Class Consultant's original recommendation New Recommendation
Bicycle,Pedestrian&Trails Coord Trails Coordinator Bicycle,Pedestrian&Trails Coord
Building Inspector II Senior Building Inspector Building Inspector II
Recreation&Volunteer Coord. Recreation Specialist Recreation Program Coordinator
Secretary IV Deleted Senior Office Specialist
In addition,the folowing Job Classes
are still under review
Building Adminsitrator
Chief Buidling Inspector
Building Inspector III
Economic Development Administrator
Street Maintenance positions
Water Utility positions
Town of Oro Valley
Position Classification Plan
Table 3 - Recommended Classification of Individual Positions
The following are the recommended changes to the Consultant's original submittal:
Employee Name Current Job Class Original Recommendation New Recommendation
Ellis,N. Bike,Ped,Trails Coord. Trails Coordinator Bicycle,Pedestrian,Trails Coord.
Lunn,K. Building Insp.II Sr.Building Insp. Building Insp.II
Seal,M. Building Insp.II Sr.Building Insp. Building Insp.II
Snyder,M. Building Insp.II Sr.Building Insp. Building Insp.II
Shelton,S. Cust.Service Rep.II Accounting Clerk Customer Service Representative
Dellerman,L. Recr.&Vol.Coord. Recreation Specialist Recreation Program Coord.
Soriano,R. Secretary IV Office Specialist Senior Office Specialist
Little,D. Secretary IV Office Sepcialist Senior Office Specialist
Town of Oro Valley Page 1 of 4
FY 2004 Salary Plan
TABLE 5 - Salary Ranges Per Job Class - (Job Class Order)
Class Salary Recommended
Code Occupational Job Families and Job Classes Range/
Grade Minimum Midpoint Maximum
Administrative&Professional Series
1000 Town Management Group
1010 #4141 Town Manager 88 $91,801 $114,751 $137,701
1100 Town Clerk Group
1110 ### Town Clerk 72 $61,839 $77,299 $92,759
1120 ### Deputy Town Clerk 44 $30,974 $38,717 $46,461
1200 Legal Services Group
1210 Town Attorney 78 $71,715 $89,643 $107,572
1220 Town Prosecutor 70 $58,860 $73,574 $88,289
1230 Civil Attorney 62 $48,309 $60,386 $72,463
1240 ### Paralegal 46 $32,542 $40,678 $48,813
1250 Legal Assistant 40 $28,061 $35,076 $42,091
1260 #4141 Legal Secretary 36 $25,422 $31,777 $38,133
1270 Law Clerk 30 $21,921 $27,401 $32,882
1300 Court Services Group
1310 ### Magistrate Judge 72 $61,839 $77,299 $92,759
1320 Court Administrator 48 $34,189 $42,737 $51,284
1330 Senior Court Clerk 36 $25,422 $31,777 $38,133
1340 #4141 Court Clerk 30 $21,921 $27,401 $32,882
1400 Financial Group
1410 ### Finance Director 76 $68,259 $85,324 $102,389
1420 Budget&Management Analyst 54 $39,649 $49,562 $59,474
1430 Accounting Supervisor 52 $37,739 $47,173 $56,608
1440 #4# Accountant 42 $29,481 $36,852 $44,222
1450 Senior Accounting Clerk 34 $24,197 $30,246 $36,295
1460 #4141 Accounting Clerk 28 $20,865 $26,081 $31,297
1500 Information Technology Group
1510 Information Technology Administrator 62 $48,309 $60,386 $72,463
1520 #4141 Information Technology Technician 48 $34,189 $42,737 $51,284
1600 Human Resources Group
1610 #4141 Human Resources Director 72 $61,839 $77,299 $92,759
1620 Human Resources Analyst 52 $37,739 $47,173 $56,608
1630 #4141 Human Resources Assistant 27 $20,356 $25,445 $30,534
1700 Town Projects&Communications Group
1710 Special Projects Coordinator 56 $41,657 $52,071 $62,485
1720 Public Information Officer 56 $41,657 $52,071 $62,485
"GS"-Current Police Grade Step Pay Plan
#4141 Salary Survey Benchmark
PSPC TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 1/14/2004
Town of Oro Valley Page 2 of 4
FY 2004 Salary Plan
TABLE 5 - Salary Ranges Per Job Class - (Job Class Order)
Class Salary Recommended
Code Occupational Job Families and Job Classes Range/
Grade Minimum Midpoint Maximum
Support Services Series
1800 Administrative Support Group
1810 ### Administrative Assistant to Town Manager 46 $32,542 $40,678 $48,813
1820 Senior Office Specialist 40 $28,061 $35,076 $42,091
1830 ### Office Specialist 34 $24,197 $30,246 $36,295
1840 Senior Office Assistant 28 $20,865 $26,081 $31,297
1850 ### Office Assistant 22 $17,992 $22,490 $26,988
1860 Customer Service Supervisor 40 $28,061 $35,076 $42,091
1870 ### Customer Service Representative 30 $21,921 $27,401 $32,882
1880 ### Receptionist 22 $17,992 $22,490 $26,988
Library Series
1900 Library Services Group
1910 ### Library Administrator 67 $54,657 $68,321 $81,985
1920 Senior Librarian 59 $44,860 $56,074 $67,289
1930 ### Librarian 53 $38,682 $48,353 $58,023
1940 Senior Library Associate 47 $33,356 $41,694 $50,033
1950 Library Associate 37 $26,057 $32,572 $39,086
1960 Library Page 20 $17,125 $21,406 $25,687
Planning&Development Series
2000 Community&Economic Development Group
2010 ### Community Development Director 76 $68,259 $85,324 $102,389
2020 Economic Development Administrator 71 $60,331 $75,414 $90,497
2030 ### Economic Development Specialist 55 $40,641 $50,801 $60,961
2040 Development Coordinator 40 $28,061 $35,076 $42,091
2100 Planning&Zoning Group
2110 ### Planning&Zoning Administrator 71 $60,331 $75,414 $90,497
2120 Principal Planner 63 $49,517 $61,896 $74,275
2130 Senior Planner 57 $42,698 $53,372 $64,047
2140 ### Planner 51 $36,818 $46,023 $55,227
2150 ### Planning Technician 43 $30,219 $37,773 $45,328
2170 ### GIS Analyst 50 $35,920 $44,900 $53,880
2180 Senior Zoning Inspector 49 $35,044 $43,805 $52,566
2190 Zoning Inspector 43 $30,219 $37,773 $45,328
2195 Zoning Inspection Technician 37 $26,057 $32,572 $39,086
2200 Building Inspection Group
2210 ### Building Administrator 65 $52,023 $65,029 $78,035
2220 Chief Building Inspector 55 $40,641 $50,801 $60,961
2235 Building Inspector II 49 $35,044 $43,805 $52,566
2240 ### Building Inspector 45 $31,748 $39,685 $47,622
2300 Building Services Group
2310 Building Permit Manager 48 $34,189 $42,737 $51,284
2320 Senior Development Technician 38 $26,709 $33,386 $40,063
2330 ### Development Technician 32 $23,031 $28,789 $34,546
2340 Senior Plans Examiner 57 $42,698 $53,372 $64,047
2350 ### Plans Examiner 53 $38,682 $48,353 $58,023
"GS"-Current Police Grade Step Pay Plan
###Salary Survey Benchmark
PSPC TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 1/14/2004
Town of Oro Valley Page 3 of 4
FY 2004 Salary Plan
TABLE 5 - Salary Ranges Per Job Class - (Job Class Order)
Class Salary Recommended
Code Occupational Job Families and Job Classes Range/
Grade Minimum Midpoint Maximum
Parks&Recreation Series
2400 Parks Group
2410 ### Parks Maintenance Supervisor 50 $35,920 $44,900 $53,880
2420 Parks Maintenance Crew Leader 40 $28,061 $35,076 $42,091
2430 Senior Parks Maintenance Worker 34 $24,197 $30,246 $36,295
2440 ### Parks Maintenance Worker 24 $18,903 $23,628 $28,354
2450 Park Monitor 24 $18,903 $23,628 $28,354
2500 Recreation Group
2510 ### Parks&Recreation Administrator 71 $60,331 $75,414 $90,497
2520 Bicycle,Pedestrian&Trails Coordinator 45 $31,748 $39,685 $47,622
2530 Recreation Program Coordinator 46 $32,542 $40,678 $48,813
2540 ### Recreation Leader 30 $21,921 $27,401 $32,882
2550 Recreation Aide 24 $18,903 $23,628 $28,354
2600 Pool Group
2610 Pool Manager 38 $26,709 $33,386 $40,063
2620 Assistant Pool Manager 30 $21,921 $27,401 $32,882
2630 Lead Water Safety Instructor 24 $18,903 $23,628 $28,354
2640 Water Safety Instructor 22 $17,992 $22,490 $26,988
2650 ### Lifeguard 18 $16,300 $20,374 $24,449
Public Safety Series
2700 Police Operations Group
2710 ### Police Chief 78 $71,715 $89,643 $107,572
2720 ### Police Commander 67 $54,657 $68,321 $81,985
2730 ### Police Sergeant GS $55,494 $59,145 $62,795
2740 Police Detective GS $38,750 $45,469 $52,187
2750 Lead Police Officer GS $38,750 $45,469 $52,187
2760 ### Police Officer GS $36,462 $43,160 $49,858
2770 Bailiff/Warrant Officer GS $36,462 $43,160 $49,858
2780 Police Reserve Officer GS $36,462
2790 Police Recruit GS $36,462
2800 Police Support Group
2810 Police Administrative Services Manager 46 $32,542 $40,678 $48,813
2820 Police Professional Development&Training Administrator 60 $45,981 $57,476 $68,972
2830 Police Training Coordinator GS $36,462 $41,288 $46,114
2840 Crime Analyst 46 $32,542 $40,678 $48,813
2850 ### Police Property/Forensics Technician GS $29,203 $34,539 $39,874
2900 Police Communications&Records Group
2910 Police Communications Supervisor GS $46,051 $49,078 $52,104
2920 ### Police Dispatcher GS $30,243 $35,807 $41,371
2930 Police Records Supervisor GS $38,854 $41,392 $43,930
2940 ### Police Records Specialist GS $25,522 $30,212 $34,902
"GS"-Current Police Grade Step Pay Plan
###Salary Survey Benchmark
PSPC TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 1/14/2004
Town of Oro Valley Page 4 of 4
FY 2004 Salary Plan
TABLE 5 - Salary Ranges Per Job Class - (Job Class Order)
Class Salary Recommended
Code Occupational Job Families and Job Classes Range/
Grade Minimum Midpoint Maximum
Public Works Series
3000 Public Works Group
3010 ### Public Works Director/Town Engineer 76 $68,259 $85,324 $102,389
3020 ### Public Works Operations Division Manager 68 $56,023 $70,029 $84,035
3030 Public Works Contracts Coordinator 44 $30,974 $38,717 $46,461
3040 ### Public Works Foreman 44 $30,974 $38,717 $46,461
3045 Senior Public Works Maintenance Worker 30 $21,921 $27,401 $32,882
3050 ### Public Works Maintenance Worker 24 $18,903 $23,628 $28,354
3100 Engineering Group
3110 ### Engineering Division Manager 68 $56,023 $70,029 $84,035
3120 Development Review Division Manager 68 $56,023 $70,029 $84,035
3130 ### Senior Civil Engineer 62 $48,309 $60,386 $72,463
3140 Civil Engineer 56 $41,657 $52,071 $62,485
3150 Construction Manager 56 $41,657 $52,071 $62,485
3155 Civil Engineering Designer 54 $39,649 $49,562 $59,474
3160 Engineering Design Reviewer 54 $39,649 $49,562 $59,474
3170 Senior Civil Engineering Technician 50 $35,920 $44,900 $53,880
3180 ### Civil Engineering Technician 44 $30,974 $38,717 $46,461
3200 Skilled Maintenance Group
3210 ### Heavy Equipment Mechanic 44 $30,974 $38,717 $46,461
3220 ### Facilities Maintenance Technician 38 $26,709 $33,386 $40,063
3230 Traffic Signal/Signage Technician 44 $30,974 $38,717 $46,461
3300 Streets Group
3310 Streets Superintendent 60 $45,981 $57,476 $68,972
3320 ### Streets&Drainage Field Supervisor 49 $35,044 $43,805 $52,566
3330 Streets&Drainage Crew Leader 45 $31,748 $39,685 $47,622
3340 Traffic Signs&Markings Crew Leader 41 $28,762 $35,953 $43,144
3350 Traffic Signs&Markings Worker 35 $24,802 $31,002 $37,203
3360 ### Heavy Equipment Operator 35 $24,802 $31,002 $37,203
3400 Transit Group
3410 Transit Services Administrator 60 $45,981 $57,476 $68,972
3420 Lead Transit Driver 30 $21,921 $27,401 $32,882
3430 ### Transit Driver 24 $18,903 $23,628 $28,354
3500 Water Utilities Group
3510 Water Utility Director 76 $68,259 $85,324 $102,389
3520 Water Utility Administrator 66 $53,324 $66,655 $79,986
3530 #441 Water Distribution Supervisor 58 $43,765 $54,707 $65,648
3540 Water Production Supervisor 58 $43,765 $54,707 $65,648
3550 ### Lead Water Utility Operator 42 $29,481 $36,852 $44,222
3560 Water Utility Operator 36 $25,422 $31,777 $38,133
3565 Water Utility Worker 30 $21,921 $27,401 $32,882
3570 Water Conservation Specialist 42 $29,481 $36,852 $44,222
3600 Water Utility Construction Group
3610 Water Utility Engineering Division Manager 68 $56,023 $70,029 $84,035
3620 Water Utility Project Manager 62 $48,309 $60,386 $72,463
3630 Construction Inspector 48 $34,189 $42,737 $51,284
"GS"-Current Police Grade Step Pay Plan
###Salary Survey Benchmark
PSPC TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 1/14/2004
Town of Oro Valley Page 1 of 5
FY 2004 Salary Plan
TABLE 6 - Salary Ranges Per Job Class - (Salary Range Order)
Class Salary Recommended
Code Occupational Job Families and Job Classes Range/
Grade Minimum Midpoint Maximum
1010 Town Manager 88 $91,801 $114,751 $137,701
87 $89,562 $111,952 $134,343
86 $87,377 $109,222 $131,066
85 $85,246 $106,558 $127,869
84 $83,167 $103,959 $124,751
83 $81,139 $101,423 $121,708
82 $79,160 $98,950 $118,739
81 $77,229 $96,536 $115,843
80 $75,345 $94,182 $113,018
79 $73,508 $91,884 $110,261
1210 Town Attorney 78 $71,715 $89,643 $107,572
2710 Police Chief 78 $71,715 $89,643 $107,572
77 $69,966 $87,457 $104,948
1410 Finance Director 76 $68,259 $85,324 $102,389
2010 Community Development Director 76 $68,259 $85,324 $102,389
3010 Public Works Director/Town Engineer 76 $68,259 $85,324 $102,389
3510 Water Utility Director 76 $68,259 $85,324 $102,389
75 $66,594 $83,243 $99,891
74 $64,970 $81,212 $97,455
73 $63,385 $79,232 $95,078
1110 Town Clerk 72 $61,839 $77,299 $92,759
1310 Magistrate Judge 72 $61,839 $77,299 $92,759
1610 Human Resources Director 72 $61,839 $77,299 $92,759
2110 Planning&Zoning Administrator 71 $60,331 $75,414 $90,497
2510 Parks&Recreation Administrator 71 $60,331 $75,414 $90,497
1220 Town Prosecutor 70 $58,860 $73,574 $88,289
69 $57,424 $71,780 $86,136
3020 Public Works Operations Division Manager 68 $56,023 $70,029 $84,035
3110 Engineering Division Manager 68 $56,023 $70,029 $84,035
3120 Development Review Division Manager 68 $56,023 $70,029 $84,035
3610 Water Utility Engineering Division Manager 68 $56,023 $70,029 $84,035
1910 Library Administrator 67 $54,657 $68,321 $81,985
2720 Police Commander 67 $54,657 $68,321 $81,985
2020 Economic Development Administrator 66 $53,324 $66,655 $79,986
3520 Water Utility Administrator 66 $53,324 $66,655 $79,986
2210 Building Administrator 65 $52,023 $65,029 $78,035
64 $50,754 $63,443 $76,132
2120 Principal Planner 63 $49,517 $61,896 $74,275
"GS"-Current Police Grade Step Pay Plan
###Salary Survey Benchmark
PSPC TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 1/14/2004
Town of Oro Valley Page 2 of 5
FY 2004 Salary Plan
TABLE 6 - Salary Ranges Per Job Class - (Salary Range Order)
Class Salary Recommended
Code Occupational Job Families and Job Classes Rangel
Grade Minimum Midpoint Maximum
1230 Civil Attorney 62 $48,309 $60,386 $72,463
1510 Information Technology Administrator 62 $48,309 $60,386 $72,463
3130 Senior Civil Engineer 62 $48,309 $60,386 $72,463
3620 Water Utility Project Manager 62 $48,309 $60,386 $72,463
2730 Police Sergeant GS $55,494 $59,145 $62,795
61 $47,131 $58,913 $70,696
2820 Police Professional Development&Training Administrator 60 $45,981 $57,476 $68,972
3310 Streets Superintendent 60 $45,981 $57,476 $68,972
3410 Transit Services Administrator 60 $45,981 $57,476 $68,972
1920 Senior Librarian 59 $44,860 $56,074 $67,289
3530 Water Distribution Supervisor 58 $43,765 $54,707 $65,648
3540 Water Production Supervisor 58 $43,765 $54,707 $65,648
2130 Senior Planner 57 $42,698 $53,372 $64,047
2340 Senior Plans Examiner 57 $42,698 $53,372 $64,047
1710 Special Projects Coordinator 56 $41,657 $52,071 $62,485
1720 Public Information Officer 56 $41,657 $52,071 $62,485
3140 Civil Engineer 56 $41,657 $52,071 $62,485
3150 Construction Manager 56 $41,657 $52,071 $62,485
2030 Economic Development Specialist 55 $40,641 $50,801 $60,961
2220 Chief Building Inspector 55 $40,641 $50,801 $60,961
1420 Budget&Management Analyst 54 $39,649 $49,562 $59,474
3155 Civil Engineering Designer 54 $39,649 $49,562 $59,474
3160 Engineering Design Reviewer 54 $39,649 $49,562 $59,474
2910 Police Communications Supervisor GS $46,051 $49,078 $52,104
1930 Librarian 53 $38,682 $48,353 $58,023
2350 Plans Examiner 53 $38,682 $48,353 $58,023
1430 Accounting Supervisor 52 $37,739 $47,173 $56,608
1620 Human Resources Analyst 52 $37,739 $47,173 $56,608
2140 Planner 51 $36,818 $46,023 $55,227
2740 Police Detective GS $38,750 $45,469 $52,187
2750 Lead Police Officer GS $38,750 $45,469 $52,187
2170 GIS Analyst 50 $35,920 $44,900 $53,880
2410 Parks Maintenance Supervisor 50 $35,920 $44,900 $53,880
3170 Senior Civil Engineering Technician 50 $35,920 $44,900 $53,880
2180 Senior Zoning Inspector 49 $35,044 $43,805 $52,566
2235 Building Inspector II 49 $35,044 $43,805 $52,566
3320 Streets&Drainage Field Supervisor 49 $35,044 $43,805 $52,566
"GS"-Current Police Grade Step Pay Plan
###Salary Survey Benchmark
PSPC TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 1/14/2004
Town of Oro Valley Page 3 of 5
FY 2004 Salary Plan
TABLE 6 - Salary Ranges Per Job Class - (Salary Range Order)
Class Salary Recommended
Code Occupational Job Families and Job Classes Range/
Grade Minimum Midpoint Maximum
2760 Police Officer GS $36,462 $43,160 $49,858
2770 Bailiff/Warrant Officer GS $36,462 $43,160 $49,858
1320 Court Administrator 48 $34,189 $42,737 $51,284
1520 Information Technology Technician 48 $34,189 $42,737 $51,284
2310 Building Permit Manager 48 $34,189 $42,737 $51,284
3630 Construction Inspector 48 $34,189 $42,737 $51,284
1940 Senior Library Associate 47 $33,356 $41,694 $50,033
2930 Police Records Supervisor GS $38,854 $41,392 $43,930
2830 Police Training Coordinator GS $36,462 $41,288 $46,114
2780 Police Reserve Officer GS $36,462
2790 Police Recruit GS $36,462
1240 Paralegal 46 $32,542 $40,678 $48,813
1810 Administrative Assistant to Town Manager 46 $32,542 $40,678 $48,813
2530 Recreation Program Coordinator 46 $32,542 $40,678 $48,813
2810 Police Administrative Services Manager 46 $32,542 $40,678 $48,813
2840 Crime Analyst 46 $32,542 $40,678 $48,813
2240 Building Inspector 45 $31,748 $39,685 $47,622
2520 Bicycle,Pedestrian&Trails Coordinator 45 $31,748 $39,685 $47,622
3330 Streets&Drainage Crew Leader 45 $31,748 $39,685 $47,622
1120 Deputy Town Clerk 44 $30,974 $38,717 $46,461
3030 Public Works Contracts Coordinator 44 $30,974 $38,717 $46,461
3040 Public Works Foreman 44 $30,974 $38,717 $46,461
3180 Civil Engineering Technician 44 $30,974 $38,717 $46,461
3210 Heavy Equipment Mechanic 44 $30,974 $38,717 $46,461
3230 Traffic Signal/Signage Technician 44 $30,974 $38,717 $46,461
2150 Planning Technician 43 $30,219 $37,773 $45,328
2190 Zoning Inspector 43 $30,219 $37,773 $45,328
1440 Accountant 42 $29,481 $36,852 $44,222
3550 Lead Water Utility Operator 42 $29,481 $36,852 $44,222
3570 Water Conservation Specialist 42 $29,481 $36,852 $44,222
3340 Traffic Signs&Markings Crew Leader 41 $28,762 $35,953 $43,144
2920 Police Dispatcher GS $30,243 $35,807 $41,371
1250 Legal Assistant 40 $28,061 $35,076 $42,091
1820 Senior Office Specialist 40 $28,061 $35,076 $42,091
1860 Customer Service Supervisor 40 $28,061 $35,076 $42,091
2040 Development Coordinator 40 $28,061 $35,076 $42,091
2420 Parks Maintenance Crew Leader 40 $28,061 $35,076 $42,091
2850 Police Property/Forensics Technician GS $29,203 $34,539 $39,874
39 $27,376 $34,221 $41,065
"GS"-Current Police Grade Step Pay Plan
###Salary Survey Benchmark
PSPC TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 1/14/2004
Town of Oro Valley Page 4 of 5
FY 2004 Salary Plan
TABLE 6 - Salary Ranges Per Job Class - (Salary Range Order)
Class Salary Recommended
Code Occupational Job Families and Job Classes Rangel
Grade Minimum Midpoint Maximum
2320 Senior Development Technician 38 $26,709 $33,386 $40,063
2610 Pool Manager 38 $26,709 $33,386 $40,063
3220 Facilities Maintenance Technician 38 $26,709 $33,386 $40,063
1950 Library Associate 37 $26,057 $32,572 $39,086
2195 Zoning Inspection Technician 37 $26,057 $32,572 $39,086
1260 Legal Secretary 36 $25,422 $31,777 $38,133
1330 Senior Court Clerk 36 $25,422 $31,777 $38,133
3560 Water Utility Operator 36 $25,422 $31,777 $38,133
3350 Traffic Signs&Markings Worker 35 $24,802 $31,002 $37,203
3360 Heavy Equipment Operator 35 $24,802 $31,002 $37,203
1450 Senior Accounting Clerk 34 $24,197 $30,246 $36,295
1830 Office Specialist 34 $24,197 $30,246 $36,295
2430 Senior Parks Maintenance Worker 34 $24,197 $30,246 $36,295
2940 Police Records Specialist GS $25,522 $30,212 $34,902
33 $23,607 $29,508 $35,410
2330 Development Technician 32 $23,031 $28,789 $34,546
31 $22,469 $28,086 $33,704
1270 Law Clerk 30 $21,921 $27,401 $32,882
1340 Court Clerk 30 $21,921 $27,401 $32,882
1870 Customer Service Representative 30 $21,921 $27,401 $32,882
2540 Recreation Leader 30 $21,921 $27,401 $32,882
2620 Assistant Pool Manager 30 $21,921 $27,401 $32,882
3045 Senior Public Works Maintenance Worker 30 $21,921 $27,401 $32,882
3420 Lead Transit Driver 30 $21,921 $27,401 $32,882
3565 Water Utility Worker 30 $21,921 $27,401 $32,882
29 $21,386 $26,733 $32,080
1460 Accounting Clerk 28 $20,865 $26,081 $31,297
1840 Senior Office Assistant 28 $20,865 $26,081 $31,297
1630 Human Resources Assistant 27 $20,356 $25,445 $30,534
26 $19,859 $24,824 $29,789
25 $19,375 $24,219 $29,063
2440 Parks Maintenance Worker 24 $18,903 $23,628 $28,354
2450 Park Monitor 24 $18,903 $23,628 $28,354
2550 Recreation Aide 24 $18,903 $23,628 $28,354
2630 Lead Water Safety Instructor 24 $18,903 $23,628 $28,354
3050 Public Works Maintenance Worker 24 $18,903 $23,628 $28,354
3430 Transit Driver 24 $18,903 $23,628 $28,354
23 $18,441 $23,052 $27,662
1850 Office Assistant 22 $17,992 $22,490 $26,988
"GS"-Current Police Grade Step Pay Plan
###Salary Survey Benchmark
PSPC TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 1/14/2004
Town of Oro Valley Page 5 of 5
FY 2004 Salary Plan
TABLE 6 - Salary Ranges Per Job Class - (Salary Range Order)
Class Salary Recommended
Code Occupational Job Families and Job Classes Range/
Grade Minimum Midpoint Maximum
1880 Receptionist 22 $17,992 $22,490 $26,988
2640 Water Safety Instructor 22 $17,992 $22,490 $26,988
21 $17,553 $21,941 $26,329
1960 Library Page 20 $17,125 $21,406 $25,687
19 $16,707 $20,884 $25,061
2650 Lifeguard 18 $16,300 $20,374 $24,449
"GS"-Current Police Grade Step Pay Plan
###Salary Survey Benchmark
PSPC TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 1/14/2004
r
Summary of Changes to the
Consultant's Report
(January 21 , 2004)
C
THE FOLLOWING CHANGES TO THE PSPC CLASSIFICATION AND
SALARY PLAN ARE RECOMMENDED BASED ON ANALYSIS OF CURRENT
REGIONAL LABOR MARKET TRENDS:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT:
Parks and Recreation Division:
1. Change Trails Coordinator classification to "Bicycle/Pedestrian/Trails
Coordinator"with linkage to Planner benchmark.
2. Change Recreation Specialist to current title of Recreation Coordinator. Change
salary grade from salary grade 42 to grade 46. Attempt to benchmark this
position in the local (Southern Arizona)municipal-specific market.
3. Change the salary grade for the Pool Manager from grade 36 to grade 38 based on
comparisons to S. Arizona data. Link this position to the Recreation Coordinator
classification.
Building Safety Division:
1. Continue to review the Building Administrator classification, and develop a
recommendation with the FY 2004-2005 Budget proposal. (There are a
number of different viewpoints on the structure of Building Safety
organizations throughout the Arizona municipal sector.)
2. A review of the remainder of the Building Safety Division supervisory
classifications will be contingent upon#1, above.
3. Office Manager/Permits Manager title has been changed to Building Permits
Manager.
4. Retain the current Building Inspector classifications. (Subject to further
refinement of the job descriptions.)
Library Services Division:
1. The Senior Library Associate classification has been changed from salary
grade 43 to grade 47 in the recommended classification plan. A 15%
differential has been maintained between the Librarian and the Senior Library
Associate classifications.
Planning and Zoning Division:
1. The Development Technician classification will be reviewed for consistency
between the building safety division and planning and zoning. (The
consultant's recommendation was based on the existence of a single
classification. Human Resources will review this classification further and
develop a proposal for the FY 2004-2005 Budget process.)
FINANCE DEPARTMENT:
1. The position of Senior Office Specialist(salary grade 40) has been added to
accommodate the previous Secretary IV classification incumbents.
2. A minimum threshold salary grade has been established for Department Head
level positions (salary grade 72). In addition, the consultant recommended
standardizing the range "spread" (i.e., the difference from minimum to
maximum) for all salary grades to 50%. This reduced the salary range
maximums for some positions. Those affected grades have been adjusted so
that no range maximums were reduced. These changes did not result in any
salary increases for incumbents.
POLICE DEPARTMENT:
No change is recommended for the Police pay plan. Because of the nature of the step
plan, any COLA increase which the Council approves for the next fiscal year is not
included at this time, and is contingent upon the upcoming budget process.
1. The consultant revised analysis worksheets for the primary benchmarks.
Based on the timing of the Council's approval of this project, the consultant's
efforts were consistent with the scope of work of the project, and the timing
issues affected the accuracy of the results.
2. Fountain Hills was deleted as a survey participant in the consultant's report.
3. Human Resources will work with the Police Chief to determine how best to
distinguish the multiple functions performed by the Property and ID Techs
and incorporate any required changes in the FY 2004-2005 Budget Proposal.
4. It is recommended that the Town's future salary survey efforts will use data
collected at the beginning of the calendar year, which will give us consistency
and accuracy for future efforts. Ongoing efforts will be conducted by the
Human Resources Department using a labor market which will be determined
based on analysis of our recruiting needs. Police Department management
and supervisors will be involved in the analysis of which jurisdictions to
include in the Police surveys for future years.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT:
1. The Transit Services Administrator classification has been changed to salary
grade 60, with non-benchmark linkage to the other engineering division
manager classifications.
2. The salary grade for the Street Superintendent classification has also been
changed to salary grade 60 (with the same linkage as that noted above). In
addition, continue to review the title for this position for possible change at a
later date (see comment below relating to an ongoing study of the streets
division).
3. PSPC concurred with the recommended change to the Civil Engineer and
Senior Civil Engineer classifications. As a result, HR recommends:
a. Classifying the Civil Engineer at grade 56, and
b. Classifying the Senior Civil Engineer at grade 62.
(In addition,the Senior Civil Engineer classification will be the benchmark,
with the Civil Engineer classification linked to it.)
4. The other Engineering classifications have also been changed accordingly:
a. Engineering Division Manager—Grade 68
b. Civil Engineering Designer - Grade 54
c. Construction Manager—Grade 56 (compared to the Civil Engineer position)
d. Sr. Civil Engineering Technician—Grade 50
e. Engineering Technician—Grade 44
5. Continue review of the proposals for the Streets and Roads Division—this
may involve the creation of additional levels within the classification plan
with specific criteria for promotions, etc. This study should be completed for
inclusion in the FY 2004-2005 budget proposal.
6. It is recommended that adjustments to minimum for any employee who falls
below the minimum of their new classification take effect on effective January
1, 2004. The consultant identified 52 employees who would fall into this
category. They would receive an average annual increase of$850.
TOWN MANAGER DEPARTMENT:
Economic Development:
1. The Secretary IV concerns were already addressed under the Finance
Department segment.
2. While the consultant did not benchmark the Economic Development
Administrator position, as a result of additional survey analysis by Human
Resources, it is recommended that this classification be changed from Grade
65 to grade 71 based on the appropriate labor market data.
Public Information:
1. The Public Information Officer classification has been changed to salary grade
56, which is consistent with the comparison of this classification to the
Special Projects Coordinator classification. The similarities in the scope of
work warrant such a change. (Appropriate linkage for both of these positions
will have to be determined.)
WATER UTILITY:
1. The error regarding the Customer Service Representative was corrected (one
of the incumbents had been erroneously identified as an Accounting Clerk).
2. The Water Engineering salary grades have been changed to: Project Manager
—salary grade 62, and Division manager— grade 68 based on the analysis of
internal job relationships and the labor market data which is available.
3. Because of the reliance on private sector data(especially in Southern
Arizona), Human Resources will analyze the Metro Water Salary Survey data
for possible inclusion of any changes in the FY 2004-2005 Budget proposal.
(This data will be used in future years, as well.)
4. #3 will alleviate concerns regarding the lack of benchmark positions at the
senior management level. (The Metro survey incorporates senior management
positions.)
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: January 21, 2004
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL
FROM: Jim Hossley
Operations Division Manager
SUBJECT: Resolution No. (R) 0405 , a resolution approving an amendment to the
Town of Oro Valley 2003-2004 General Fund budget authorizing an
interest free $64,000 inter-fund loan to the Storm Water Utility Fund to
implement the Town of Oro Valley Storm Water Management Program.
Background:
I have evaluated the Storm Water Utility Commission's budget requirements to implement the
storm water program in compliance with the Town's Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (AZPDES) permit. I determined that the Department of Public Works would need
$509,168 (approximately $128,000 per year) as interim funds to get the program up and
running as well as sustain it through the remaining 48 months of the permit period. This
amount includes hiring an engineering technician dedicated to the storm water program. The
overall cost of the program ($2,197,407) has not changed; this just means that funds and
resources currently allocated for existing purposes would also absorb some of the storm water
program costs.
An amendment to the 2003/2004 fiscal year General Fund budget authorizing an immediate
interest free loan of$64,000 to the Storm Water Utility Fund will permit the Town to initiate
implementation of the storm water management program in compliance with the AZPDES
permit. This loan would be re-paid over the next three (3) years from a future storm water utility
revenue source. Future funding for the storm water utility beyond June 30, 2004 will be
considered in the 2004/05 annual budget and subsequent budget years thereafter.
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution (R) 04-os
2. Spreadsheet labeled Interim Budget for AZPDES Permit Compliance
FISCAL IMPACT:
$64,000; transferred from the Fiscal Year (FY) 2004/05 General Fund budget to the Storm Water
Utility Fund budget.
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 2
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Department of Public Works staff recommends approval of the resolution approving an FY 2003/04
General Fund budget amendment authorizing the transfer of funds from the General Fund to the
Storm Water Utility Fund.
SUGGESTED MOTION: The Town Council may wish to consider one of the following motions:
I move to approve Resolution (R) 04 -os , a resolution approving an amendment to the Town of
Oro Valley 2003-2004 General Fund budget authorizing an interest free $64,000 inter-fund loan to
the Storm Water Utility Fund to implement the Town of Oro Valley Storm Water Management
Program.
Or
I move to deny approval of Resolution (R) 04 -os
� ,��
ji�Jim Hossley Paul Nzomo, P.E.
Operations Division anager Acting Town Engineer
r ,
Charles Sweet
Town Manager
RESOLUTION NO. (R) 04-05
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY 2003-2004 GENERAL FUND BUDGET
AUTHORIZING AN INTEREST FREE $64,000 INTER-FUND LOAN TO
THE STORM WATER UTILITY FUND TO IMPLEMENT THE TOWN OF
ORO VALLEY STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.
WHEREAS, the Town of Oro Valley is required to implement a storm water
management program pursuant to the Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (AZPDES) permit; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Oro Valley Storm Water Utility Commission created a
Storm Water Program incompliance with the AZPDES permit; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Oro Valley Storm Water Utility Commission has determined
the cost to implement a Storm Water Program incompliance with the AZPDES
permit; and
WHEREAS, the AZPDES program is an un-funded federally mandated program that
the Town of Oro Valley must implement using local funding; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Town Council are authorized to amend the Town's
annual budget as may be required.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE MAYOR AND THE TOWN COUNCIL
OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, approve an amendment to the
Town of Oro Valley 2003-2004 General Fund budget authorizing an interest free
$64,000 inter-fund loan to the Storm Water Utility Fund to implement the Town
of Oro Valley Storm Water Management Program.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro
Valley, Arizona this 21St day of January , 2004.
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
Paul H. Loomis, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathryn E. Cuvelier, Town Clerk
Date
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Mark Langlitz, Town Attorney
Date
O --H -1 _1 D C7 D --I -I -i K -1 D 0 -1 0) 3
, o_ o Qo o o v CO = ED = moo O m0 < iiiIcn (D w
-- CD C)• in"000 CD ii) 0 .-•� - •••s CU Sv (n (p 3 (D CD (D CV (D
II) O p 6 (D c -' (! (n CD CD (D 0 N
— --. � r- o �. � � c w r = v o w �
En n' o �- C7 cQ FT ca o O o
2 _. O 0 o w. c �_ —ap, -- 0 cD o Z. m - -,
w CO
a O (D cn u) -, v CD v OFO MI
(„ _+ K cD
(n -� to C)
al-O O O• (n �. (D (D a') (�D (D
CC N _ CT
•a) a. cQ O CO COO C
CD � O = C
O
v
c2o-101111111111111111111111111101611111111111con
�C
O �
Po
1111111
c 3
110 �.
CD
v
n- N n
• ' - OO tp
OO 11131
-ea -'
IQ CD Ct
0-1 OW
OOO
O oO o
pp
1\31\-)
CO -
Eft
O W
O n ._..a cO
O O
O OD O N
M.
y0 0N _.o _.
Ca
Z
0
CD cQ
m
-nomEft _ N � � � � EA -n
II C) y 01 O y 01 Oo4S. oma) 01 •
°0 w oo �o 00 00 0 o U' CO o o CO o - 3
O - O cn O O O N cr
v
-n
o01 N)
-n X11
1:1 ip
CL W N O N N -� -' N
01
-<
CD
co y -cr.
o
p Cn O O O O O O N
-a)
0 0 0 0 CD
3 CD
0 O O O O •A O O CA)
Z. 0 O O 0
I
O _.
I -
I
co te
N t�3 �9 N N E� N-ICO - O01
O -0)(°(71-"
00O �O
• 01 71
Cn b., 0 :K.)
poOOO01OO0N Cn0 0OO OOO WO :A)
Wo
O y O O Cfl �.
C.
TZ-
W Cn N EA
Cn• - W W TI
-<
O W CO 0
O llo 7,"
0 0 0 co
w CO
o
O 001
0
("� W
co c� oo 0 o O c.c. .� CO cfl ao
co
O
CO
0) N O CO W 00 p -<
CD -' (xi .. OD N
COCO CDcn 01 .-*
-cm 0 01 0) 0 O o W O O O 0) iv C
0) O • 0 00 O CD .N 0 O 0 IV Cn CT
NOD
CJ1 C3) co -A, O 0
c
OODD OWD .00 N j
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
- --
TO: CHUCK SWEET, TOWN MANAGER
FROM: t JIM HOSSLEY, OPERATIONS DIVISION MANAGER
SUBJECT: INTERIM COSTS TO IMPLEMENT THE TOWN'S STORM WATER
PROGRAM
DATE: DECEMBER 23, 2003
CC: BILL JANSEN, TOWN ENGINEER
I have evaluated the Storm Water Utility Commission's budget requirements to
implement the storm water program in compliance with the Town's Arizona
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) permit. I determined that the
Department of Public Works would need $509,168 as interim funds to get the
program up and running as well as sustain it through the remaining 48 months of
the permit period. This amount includes hiring an engineering technician
dedicated to the storm water program. The overall cost of the program
($2,197,407) has not changed; this just means that funds and resources currently
allocated for existing purposes would also absorb some of the storm water
program costs. I am requesting consideration be given to loaning the
Department of Public Works $128,000 per year against a future storm water
revenue source. Assuming the Town Council would consider this idea as a
budget amendment in January 2004, the loan request for the remainder of the
fiscal year is $64,000.
I have attached a spreadsheet itemizing how these interim funds would be spent.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
r
' ! ID 1 co
vo = ago
o 0 it ao co LO
I- = cO co
t` �' 'a O 'a' r-
u) N O a o O o ..-n,. O CD
= — co 000 1 .I 0O0 C) (. CO ,n
co
CD
a 0 � M CDOo a o � �; co
>- (p a N- Li-.) co r- OM N to !n LL c\ co co OM co
N NEa Q3 : :-
(A N Eft Ea
I
I i
J 1 1
Qi O o, IDi f O 010! ' �O !O ,co a i
O co N O O O LO 0 0 0 t O f a'
Cr)Lo o co a cfl o C.oCO
a) CO °° E) 0, o O OO c
CV r- E{} r- N CV Eft Cy r N
1 i 1 1 1 l { 1
1 i i 1
1 CDo
0 0,O O ,t- 0 10 �r
0 co c� o o a N co to, a o O 0 1 i 0 O C0 Ut) ;`;
co- O cfl ►� Qo a) o I to O to o co E j
cv c- r N N
0_ _ EftEft Eft Ef} EP) Ea Eft ' LL Eft Eft (a
i I r
Et1) N r- O a O Q M r- �.
= % Zcf N °� 0 Oo a °- � , oO o o 00
C') >. 't N CD fa 1 N N O N r' Ea U) >- N I O N M '''
tj f) LL } (ft Eft Ef} Ea LL EA ea CZ
6. V
W E -
Um r—
O O 1 Lo O{ a O 0I d.; '� C. IN 0 z
Z Q 0 0 0
CD O a 0 00 w © �- O 47:
M M a Lo En a _ CO -
a r N O Ea -c-
CA I NEf} Ea CU ›- N -c- CO ,--
Ea
Eft64
Ea LL Ef} Ef-}
o)
111 1111 E c
, ii)
I 1 Q r:
(13
J 1- 1 i , ' 1 Y ,_,
"r• I f a
may,
II I � i C
� I I I I --
In Q?
_ lid t_;,
LL as u_ o u_ L.,--:
o
CD
N O N as 1 1 I U N L»
.n as 2 I I , 1 I .4?; 1 CO
N +� L- N U cm : I U
co2 o 06 as N
m - o aJ p .- = '� .c o U 0 . C
=
0 +L-, O O Q rte-+ .�-' ( L cm U Q) _o 0 :,�_ _
Q co as Q co I . C .> M -
♦' N Q U a� - Q i to - - 1 a) 1 0 - Q B
Cii N
' v, p D' E LL' cv a) i j = I i+r j } U N .� U
U c� o a3 0`` a- CO o ID cB o ;, ! ca U co o c�
E w_H 10 1 , 1 I 1 IQ H1 j �, i F"1 1 1 1.-1Q,v1d ,_(1)- _ F— 0
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: January 21, 2004
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & TOWN COUNCIL
FROM: Steven Faaborg, Senior Civil Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Ordinance No. (0)04-o1 , Annexing that portion of the Northern Avenue right-
of-way between Hardy Road on the north and Camino Cortaro on the south.
SUMMARY:The recent annexation by Oro Valley of what was known as Area "B" has
resulted in a portion of Northern Avenue between Camino Cortaro and Hardy Road
remaining in unincorporated Pima County while the roadway both north and south of that
location is maintained by the Town of Oro Valley. This has resulted in confusion among
the public as to who is maintaining the street as well as a lack of continuity in
maintenance operations. Arizona state law contains a provision (ARS 9-471 N) which
allows annexation of "a county right-of-way or roadway with no taxable real value" by
mutual consent. Pima County has agreed to this annexation and will bring it before the
County Board of Supervisors should it be approved by the Oro Valley Town Council.
ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance No. (0)04-01 , Legal description and Map of the area to be
annexed.
FISCAL IMPACT: Yearly maintenance costs would average approximately $5,500,
including signage, sweeping, striping, crack-sealing and surface maintenance. This figure
is based on a typical average cost of$0.75 per square yard of paving per year.
RECOMMENDATIONS OF STAFF: The Department of Public Works recommends
approval of Ordinance No. (0)04-o1 , Annexing that portion of the Northern Avenue right-
of-way between Hardy Road on the north and Camino Cortaro on the south.
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION PAGE 2 OF 2
SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve Ordinance No. (0)04-01 , Annexing that
portion of the Northern Avenue right-of-way between Hardy Road on the north and
Camino Cortaro on the south.
or
I move to deny Ordinance No. (0)04-o1 , Annexing that portion of the Northern Avenue
right-of-way between Hardy Road on the north and Camino Cortaro on the south.
William Jansen, P.E., To -11ygineer
Chuck Sweet, Town Manager
ORDINANCE NO. (0) 04-01
AN ORDINANCE EXTENDING AND INCREASING THE
CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
ARIZONA, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF TITLE 9,
CHAPTER 4, ARTICLE 7, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES AND
AMENDMENTS THERETO, BY ANNEXING THERETO
CERTAIN TERRITORY CONTIGUOUS TO THE EXISTING
TOWN LIMITS OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA —
NORTHERN AVENUE RIGHT-OF-WAY BETWEEN HARDY
ROAD ON THE NORTH AND CAMINO CORTARO ON THE
SOUTH
WHEREAS, as an alternative to the procedures established in ARS § 9-471 requiring a petition
process, a county right-of-way or roadway with no taxable real property may be annexed to an
adjacent city or town by mutual consent of the governing bodies of the county and city or town if
the property annexed is adjacent to the annexing city or town for the entire length of the
annexation and if the city or town and county each approve the proposed annexation as a
published agenda item at a regular public meeting of their governing bodies; and
WHEREAS, an annexation shall become final after the expiration of thirty days from the
adoption of an ordinance annexing the territory by the city or town governing body, provided the
annexation ordinance has been finally adopted in accordance with procedures established by
ARS § 9-471.
WHEREAS, the Northern Avenue right-of-way between Hardy Road on the north and Camino
Cortaro on the south is a county right-of-way or roadway with no taxable real property; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, desire to extend the
corporate limits of the Town of Oro Valley to include the Northern Avenue right-of-way
between Hardy Road on the north and Camino Cortaro on the south; and
WHEREAS, the Pima County Board of Supervisors desires to grant its consent allowing the
Town of Oro Valley to extend its corporate limits to include the Northern Avenue right-of-way
between Hardy Road on the north and Camino Cortaro on the south; and
WHEREAS,the provisions of ARS 9-471, and amendments thereto, have been fully observed.
F:'Joe\Public Works\Legislation\Northern Avenue annexation Ordinance 122303.doc Office of the Town Attorney/ca.'040103
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the following described territory shall be annexed to the Town of Oro
Valley, Arizona once approved by the Pima County Board of Supervisors, and that the present
corporate limits be extended and increased to include the following described territory
contiguous to the present Oro Valley limits, as fully described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto
and incorporated herein by this reference.
SECTION 2. That all ordinances and part of ordinances in conflict herewith be repealed to the
extent of such conflict.
SECTION 3. That this Ordinance and the various parts thereof are hereby declared to be
severable. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, word or phrase of this ordinance is, for
any reason, held to be unconstitutional, such holdings shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portion of this ordinance.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Common Council of the Town of Oro Valley,
Arizona, this?1 tity of January , 2004.
APPROVED this day of , 2004.
Paul H. Loomis, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathryn E. Cuvelier, Town Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Mark J. Langlitz
Town Attorney
F:\Joe\Public Works',Legislation\Northern Avenue annexation Ordinance I22303.doc Town Attorney's Office'ca'I 22303
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND MAP
F:Joe\Public Works\Legislation\Northern Avenue annexation Ordinance 122303.doc Town Attorney's Office.'ca'122303
Exhibit A
Legal Description
That portion of the Northern Avenue right-of-way between Hardy Road
and Camino Cortaro more fully described as follows:
The east 75 feet of the south 75 feet of the southeast one-quarter of
the southeast one-quarter of Section 23, Township 12 South, Range
13 East, Gila and Salt River Meridian, Pima County, Arizona;
-also-
The west 75 feet of the south 75 feet of the southwest one-quarter of
the southwest one-quarter of Section 24, Township 12 South, Range
13 East, Gila and Salt River Meridian, Pima County, Arizona;
-also-
The west 75 feet of the north 2612.79 feet of the northwest one-quarter
of Section 25, Township 12 South, Range 13 East, Gila and Salt River
Meridian, Pima County, Arizona;
-also-
The east 75 feet of the north 2612.79 feet of the northeast one-quarter
of Section 26, Township 12 South, Range 13 East, Gila and Salt River
Meridian, Pima County, Arizona;
Said parcel contains 9.26 acres, more or less.
Northern Avenue
~4•L a` A
`! •ti•-gin'' .).'.
l• ,,..„.+•?Z3's't, _:. _ ,}^ t-� ..:y 1.-w•x.F-+ r ..+�"t ,. -
f.., >•
Cvi'% -
vi.
'tie +1{r! .?,jv�.`'^� .,e. _•n�:'X . ▪ . r
[, Y Y= e y-
y 4
2 r
''1.�• -Y-.:J. ! ..i:.F�s"�pi a ;25 'i.� t-r' w. ..f, a.
�•V l•l. Z:.,r, jYt.Y•'.t " ::t-� ri` :r•!i: J:1 .t+i-':n
:.+•.•,r.+�.y •f`,....'i.. .,1'Skr>,�L, �F...�:r � :. .'.J, s. Y•".:a . ::*:*i.4$t•iuS Sx- .sSL - ..re '�t�p,
r_.. a a_. .x. 'M r'n .'i^♦ ��a'_rrt.(. r. 91. ':r� .a:tt� `.:�'... ' `'r t:L Y;.: :;'t3. likillEll
7.. �.?♦.,,. t'7 ..♦�'f'.,+�.': .F.,'S'. '�`"`:. :p,Fstp..!'• .'r�. p r
/:•ir •rt• :mss
gg _;s'
c is
,.. .t.� �..._... .,. ., .� .ct'...u> .:.. ... .. .,.,�,,� •artr >.� ,••1:'"a?-;1
.:• t.�-.,. 'y :firx••s4 .r>- .s ly�.J. !-:'.ya. ,/•' Sn •M'f7 fl. 1:,. t"1:-.:...3-. :.!! ::t„ '( ..4+: L ]' 3 Y : tb is ..k:T: j
Iia>> .]' "':!!'.W. +`Tr:. %' •✓yr; ▪.) .V'`•i .L yF >t':•a' !•Y.-
; .i :. :er. ;' :rh4 •. ..•.• j•• �... !S,'-rs• _ r:
-•f..,SY•. il• �-�. �i> .r,..'.•f �s..+r:t•..... .S E :. ^.•, .:ti �.(r t.. [>' .l' }
t. n. %SY �♦
'ill
,'moi j ti.t..` rV+ r. •J':^;� kr'
� •t� •t A. •'Y�•l;i�A�'=��• ,t.;.'n.�_? . �ti� `'7 t1,. :r,yr' !9� :r,s`�+.-.. «t >r �f�.. s L.'�.,2 ♦.a ''f ,:�. .,F. .,. ;t<:.a-trHr. '}�.. >3>I� rr•'..t �'�7,. i:t''f'• t� +i\.:;.. '7. i" w"':, <-,•••Yi;•1-......� ..^ur<.'.7 7•;`+_'.t. �TT.�.�`ftY+t:.:.^�:v..:?-+i.....7.•t `�zi.. �4. >.S. 4�_.)• �. �t�•:f. 2" '���,.,. 77.77
;Y:,' - "M.I.J S.M•`.!? 'S .l..w 'u'1.^ -�s1. .F! r i ..::-•;f•`-; ,.y., 4d.rt4 .11.ry,.�, t. � fie,_ c: :4a� � �-;j � b4s ®r £:Y{_,x�s.,,t� Y-t i .� '._�C-,,+*t (''. rt.111 41111111FA
a •
• ....
r i�� (' f ty • Sts s..i,�.' •.St I"2'4 �i>F•�[L ,':iy ,yr>�3,r T f lyt..•1 ,.,• a i r :rt7��wf,t+.-.�y •+Ki •sr' E ,•G,+ r .•i�r, fr,. t t,a.. ,t ,4;::::, _ `' ,Ys\",•re.'•+4 xiC;•S,fY•!7,;�s. > .tea� 't �-4ks;:.•r'• „y7'+ r..lt�r1'' �I s!ds.J:; '.�. -ore " lk: +��i,,+.>,! r ...i ,4 ; � r,.rfiF tr ?> t a2w!o p. 7nt>[ w:x••h >.. t s Y rc�;wt '+ rt•♦.w• r_s: E r ,
� �♦yx.`: kr' 's'-i>. w n�:� � Ys t_ � L h• t..kn611 r.,5.t ;i 4:.; i
irk Si ,.r:.. sit {-_ •� +,, 1,-!^ 4'2' [ll't`•':.. .?-. a_ri ,.;-:'.:4,
°rr >+, .
7:n},YJ tt/-:js:'p1l. v .'T: r '.`j•' tt,o Y.Y y,+r^'�.i.,;7:f\ t' fr.� ! h�y�.•,: �';i±;^� it�,.:> � c. ''}^�.
��t� ti �r. ft3� ..7.t.♦!. r � #y.J.. j1-f 'y, K ti r.1 �x --.Z2,-;
[ ,{
y4=:. s .T1.% Lf .r' i:�r � ?! ;1:z : f 7,rt .,•_ t �+ � t rr- y�; it-
•p:;
i l `C >� 'ha. Y�P•'. �•!'' [>..✓�. '• .'k .<��.J J 11_ r!i' x' ',Lfr 7 r
4#4I 11141 N ,,,,i-,,,,-- i•':� ay '' ..*R'' i r.7,14ii
J „ r t .f--+ .k.7 K • �7`r ,ili -4,�t i.4-_ est •�,,. w�,.�. '. ,; J 7i'la* �: :J.. •$.^-t,` -.,'}��'- j•�`,'�e�� 7i�,� _..•p' t•x' t�:s�" '�'�J:f'i��t! •� ''r tri'=r _"}"+`•Fi*: -r •s ,t" `j2f,; �.�r ,-'i , :�!• f114,:,_ .• t.I r ' �!3 kj� :rA,�h'ei3.:a is�j� �1.��<< 17F.-Y✓ ��qrn � a ��, 1"��,. Y�:1.•d r� -j-i`�•s r`'r.�a.>Zt..R� _ ,"x.YIi. ::J'r+:iwn.:ra�ttr• +*-i'' -'r�r'i 'n't is k /• ::: S••_{tit +3y t SFr• ,i.. it '+ -s' .f y Y' ,#f.firr ;i:�Y•ti:s 'f,:t(.i}i i'+t..-yr,f i r • ...:�♦ f y9. e; ;".•;:!--...:, -:
t.'' f `+v '' } t r+"'.• %Cf .r.; ,,,iJ .� 2-:-,
'�Wxi.F. _ t.t s- •.
Na S,?', tf u''_F..:,.:7.';::,:§.:ix tS'-•, j,3r�''4i r t s.r�;i3,,a' .!F + 4 3. c-. {S :>? ';',,--1?'`:Yt: "t .
aµ.+ ,T,a^•yr p 4.
'1M C .-'/ \ .4r' Yl t Y ,�*r.Y t„^.r I +'.,.ftt,N44,1'Agt-,ay .I rN_Y!s'1 t.LJ..„ `ir_1.14.»� � ••f'p
i �.tiF-iP.�' e�;.>:r:�M i.�.�t.•3:. ��- t t`• YA,t•;i' 4 rr. a • .V °
Pik
�:.tJFk'.��+?' 3 r.'.� s .i' �• a�l..-•s {i�-,alt t v �:'•^• �Sa Pyr't�f'' i,� T.:r>T,,. +�' ,.�'r.: �• h,..s,., ''+si• {J::''''.5.,t�,\'A
11*AirAW.
✓ -M �'rX J'!• � Y..ti'tt.Q' l ,A II� 1/ t� •t> f
,t_ i ;>• f•i 7:41f4
t,D,�.i."7 s .;t7>szt"�i°;A:s rs�g3?'''k:; .'a.•.'+ttYm,cm���iHHH ��._ssi T +'~�f:.�'. ;^;a� :.�r.F•:.'y�r24:r4�,'� l r ,� r.
:�>� 1 .�'T,;� ✓.5:."-.yti:ri .trl.r-s.< ..>+. ? `r't �., �'• i 1i» ✓f v� -I., r t '.
�� , :`..'":"U
�.. .�.r .r.,s}f�'.�.y>... r• •
_ ,....rs: p s®a p$i>, !_ 1'.'_ ri J. .,�,1�• t .
a "1 �4"^ '+.�'^' f;t+,• ». '�•��c'^P!�. sr't�` .:®i 9 E i�!�6�sH# ��, n ^•;s'3i•v tS.'- F f {.1.{'.:,+". r',
.., �25�r:.,,= s.A .�''s.n£tttt;{i sS�,�.� >�r 1+3„ �' 1'w i{`-. � I
'' '��I��. S
.+�.:.�,! .ti. >.;^ ,�::_.e,'rl.4�G{��F'=x.r��'i;�N�. ':::?:.:1E
.+r•�yypp gg®®yy ®ppppgg j- .f:i� `.! -ri, Ir - 111
• �•_gpAlfriatik%
/,. r s t t" 0`.4 rL.:pia 'U✓• ,Z 1.•s. e y 1�■y�1®s� L•
,. ¢,t..r. t nom Xa tt :, MEd
�'a .: �t_ a � �lBil��OC6aCi�9 S 5
�� ,RTA M1•x •,•,,+f'c it{ Y's7".,.�.1 2t�� vPy-�..� _t j "`�. !tj ii +•x� � : ±
f IIRMN :t. r i.,.•r R � ' <t 6� r ^f kr wY
E`t.-'i' to.y t� f{.(ht y r4� m8 a + v a.�. Zf it 'r � A sr• ;
• •. -law*..= p , r'fat` [L yfH,.�rpt+11. ,h, + !r},__,,.,„„, r,{ s : ...,„•.e. •,: t.+ 1 .,,..„ yr a r^ii:g::::-. _,..-.. - ,
Alla' milli.4 .;!
.A1111111
„4:: K'V',:f
'�`T ; � at I .�~ Rv-- J;.;* ` } :. i/ :,:_.ld r•.R,'•s >r�,^: e � t f��•', r tM ,'�',,2:::,:-.. ,:::i
i } .'r� +c .� QiO , ATIC- ^.f+S.r,:� t t r'i �r � 'S•, + ri+ ['f.Y� r w� `• �>• ,{A•:'`: a 't 'r1!:_ �!'.»r• X1;7 r1.1�_� �. t _ :7:7.',-",::.':::;'...-7:;,:-. .':,;'....;_Z:,1::;;,':
t_ ., F. ?�. +4i•ff.� �;sd,c.l�: pi f� r }
. igiipiii*Vu .Yt•.I -i•v J 1._i.7 .t. t R.
Jr, r t .yiM!t t T .Y �f.�1•>r. ,l• �.�/ . ft .�1}
„,,,,„:::„,, ,;...::,..„,:,.,....:.„,...,...... .4
..
ilpi. .... f[ +.•f..:t t;r"♦ ,tri:, `t, ,
, ...,„a i,11-10
3.k....''''.:.'::::'::;;::::.::.,.:.,:e.::'.::':..,. .::-....'.::,'::::'::k..':"...'!;::::.'.44‘111100i-..*. W 111111111
illiall'""''''':'▪•:'.:'. '''''''''240411.1'.'.''''':". ''. -.'"''''' ''`EN.:W ?::'''-'14"-.:.: -..41?'
111 lit..--.:.:- . '-'-::::"-1:'-'''''.4171..:.:.::::fi...ttjY1.:.;:;' '': :- &-. .*4..:.:: :-..44)4tit.''''''' .11111°14/
. IIIIIIII 6114(1°011111APAIIIMMiritAdriPagbIalaPimmo N vs,'.Wiz-7.-Avikv...: ...-::'---:,':.':-:.:.i 1_41.,;likiti,.. *--.F#A-,sii;....- "jilt/to..kii
:., :::,,.4... ,ii,::#::-. esr/7:4-rii -4.7.•:- .qiiii inn.. 411 4&. ''-
::.V.R.::...;,...i.,-.-...:
111111
.„ Ism
111111111111111Wir41,•A
.-'_tart�� 6�C�•�P., _::�:��. ®'�: ....,-i
.; .ikvw,....-- ::.::
ii -
4111"'" 11111111m1 EN' inkeits ., .* 0
lip , ifilie, . 1
?Al IN
Ireb„„%vAii.
,, _.,,
or,f8i.
WEL.Ofig:?!-simi;t4a*,,,,A0oirigi‘
r7wr' : R1161®ffI .:
}•'+' ♦f.,. >tt�".,r4rd•i >r,'911W61'm51®� • .L.
,:i.,.,0,1r...,101410,.. .m. _ iris
ft'grliii !!...,,,,,, '+fit• +'�..i. C�. .�`+!'�i 6����C�p:•; ,.
' tr 't<4. p_i.i t-er: 6� nt i 1 r■■■■ '•ii77: it ^ ,--Igitt
_ , ,,ii ?a.1 t +' -'+f-}. .,..eta S�'
:•tl t 1 � 1'1 ; ♦[ �!!tom�� -0/':
;..:*$-***41111"1411111Ev.4
4
saill
f,�! ! :-1....,h:-. J�� s�.l f�a:� h.'E S J I�+''_ _t,t:i .`'f(,
-ow vat--'' Eris
• 011111 �L Q!S'�� 'r�� .4i� p5 s •.�.�a� � ^L��14.}��'s+..i,t r t;' :ft �
-.•S t <i j't u l l'"4 i'(., it t .6r$>l/1a.F3 s'+•iv,rS^v 4 r; [7 , t
" ' _ 40
ftlirtill
AND��. s t��.t. �� vs 1 .r '}'� api�a: a�s�'�Q'�.$ - �">:n:• #'
,,�, rr+ v p.s1':.�. zr. ��?' �1�1�i Si78 jtr"+� _r >t.. Jnr.r• _
': 0 Fr t r'ry`.c. 1 ir4T 'S 1: ;. >t?\> '�'.t •7SJ39 4l1's7 t.WB �• :t! '••.i };: +r ',v'1d-t
Lpt��5.` ,t, t s e 1
I� < k:' A'+t 1'w�6' fil.4A`y r rY !;4p} ;Etpy ep teyiy4 •r,.r�1 i y r r r r
‘■ •OINENions III lill'7�sr.�{ :hi�4 t�j f*,�!:,Ue6 r•ty�''li f��i��6ia RPC � �. Y yX t tl; �+���{• �+ -
,,>e:>tt i .if�.r k!3..yam, ;+.._ � .r:, y 1-:t�:1.-;....;.:t.:...>,tw��,,,��Y'.2T-•'3 a
..-,-...::,:.,.:-
I
j} vt•y aN'i'*:-', t'!�: .>[• „�✓. ;s-7=/� -.2x F,• j��S��" t �t t;-rr' ,�4f•�E •f�'Vr x
11&
rr,•�,1±•.��firG '!�'� -+Ir}�r1'"ti-.�•f:.:t/4�l:�R,r.;.Zc•.t l rg f+>'+�~1!•r. :.; . 1M K. 7 f -`/fyy a. p ,•'iw;
. '4�.^Ti✓fi.• as'�'-' �sk�� ------ rtil,o1� =ik..ift•_:v.- r i� t.:� -�#....0�. ar�.�•a. =nal a'�
;z: -fi:i'�?.•! � .�;:,t :ar,'�r..y'.aft:•� r. i' \.:� r:.s+x:•y,^.ie�N:. +F''TW'�r�-1 Xi':+/.� .t
�� } .�,.'t. .z•T,Fi. ,,, Y.:�r:_�.-. +f-° .t:�-,tom.rt r..::{•t!i i_r� .''_[.rw'As- -',,-.-:-...-.,•-rriiiii:-..-,::::::..:-;:....::-.::':-..:'::
lit,.ur> {,�/a1r•- +�Y {a. .,d i e tr:, '.+i-!Txl n r. :i n ..a,:•.- ;:J•. fu.,};,si i;`Yr yY is�id.,�.F�y: ,;r,«•�...£r.•_.>': •!: :-,...-:.-:.::,..-::,, !
RPA.• 4111kdil ,i 1.� f�'•� �� �,-r';`ff!•: �r{�\r: .�w k,,. �ck 'G} .`.,t ,,- ;st r. .. tis r`':.f_r'�:s'rit�� �Y a w-��it+-
�_ r `: D .r.r; :A:�: } ,,, •i •if ry+.5} 7. a•. `fit.. `-Yl fy� y�����• ( j,J /'.J .� Ste:Jy.. �; > .: \
,u. +r 4l4,> iI�JQ1 �7' .r.•i1 l;�r ,'M1(.��p•>ry•,�tS Lt•�y �i :.�1 tom...ti:'f•j:f'1:)•ii:��/Vii�J�l.Y. ^y�t r.�e�f 1'S�A
IA
�. t•f j i> . <}.:Fib i,. � y:. rt .t',`r9 L
'Z ,.i,t cSSL+�• � �.':i`+'_.J..'S;t+••.�•.! 't'*'L.':Ft• �.!'i �•!. ./.:r}>, ='i": ,a'e _,•x.�.• .t'i>r•
1�M+s S .,•:;{ /S ,.tr.Y�tp Sa.. 't ^ ii-:+;.,:'T i33=v" .[{r ; '.C' >�L- �r _ti..'�:�rt�;�rt:�?'J•��t.>i�f:�.�r�'Y,.r�:y+ ,a
t�}]g''.:t.,rw:>t :"ab. ��, I.,ur �,'r"-'•fit .t.�, iCiy:'t'. rL.Fftic•.;S?:;�y 'ki',`1t T. tr r'1'..t t♦ ir3 fs1•�f�.�.0-y n..;J•- �.il[�"k+P''Y��'�X� ~ !: .
.t
.� i;7'1Kh"':f' �:, •.�., i<it "'r •z.*+i :tt::"t s.NJ f'v+t ° ,•''a� 't 't,✓_t .,.�. ``+1�.,..,x'.:nF:, .^F t.'tR.:.dr =<v
�..r!,,•r <' a r, ;:t+.',}••Q•; '^t_ c?x';i.. G vy`-:.�:r ns.,:. �'SL .a. r:��_- c :.�+'.•.?� ''!.>.'.:3-•R£i:!`;.`-a_. S's� �':rq
T* 5,,.. ,r.'•> s i>:,.'•<1 r L ..�Y+.>•,{r• f, _t• ;,y.. ::..:.,'1y:.•t t > . 3� [d ,t}
■ rte. ; r � •� �--.j.�i y'�iY� �t��'.lr {��G•. �a;'i. 1i1.,r f •t Fr 1 .1L,• -'- �,nr -�?t s �t '� �! �1 r.a
+4•w 3 /.,,. � `:Y>' ,•rY >`'N ��'(-.,€•r J >*fr r >4 `/t; ?+.:r.t.r ^' vt y1 i1 tr� f s
` �r ia':., a-J '..a6' •c.r 12e+y ' ' �t t r rt -+3. �t.�'..9 t�'.s..`r•+.e> � tih t 2'yXiT', ri"'-�.. 1 > �.:
;L<s rz.;•a,;.e+;;i{'����5.�� .y;�.. -!P �..�. ! .. �`�,=aw?i`ft <-t f .r. tx�:. f -Y r. r }' :>ti. ..� r
3d.. ,w.
+iJ:: �T' -it .z. 'L ++��,,..;;t fl..�..r�hr.a.,_};T •�! t:r"F[tFf �Y(t•+afi r?•t �Y. 4,Si- r.Sy ft. :' 0.r_:?}`Sa fly r'}•Ir ,i..x t.4»!
r s'K♦.k'' 'IFi "r' r r,x 1 s.. t ` ti •,..43'.:-.4, ♦• [n IE,..t' +"' ,x
rt;4:.;';':'.,4;'
.,Y •F r`�.y •sr.a_r 4:i'-'1.a
`?. >`v.' L.yS�( :fi'�T. y:...,',',s,
�: r1 r T(:, �f.. �
ii_. y'=M:�/r..S�f y.t!.-sr.of s..�.f,4,4 l •J.�'>�;,�: _ ..;,i 1?s, ,yt1,j f- • �.�-r'!`ri'P-"it t.•Ml'>R•��_�•••.rX��,s .q t :. *.
I IM1111111111111111MEIN= r•i z'Yef: R'"', t+•ii4' ..f'°ra..' .p. a. ° '.i! ;-.. ..-, .::: d.`. '1 + 5. ,•_1 `s n'. W t.s' '::-.r.11111
,
r..r 3 r� s >rs�txp tics tit.t8?aT rt -'+ a s.�[x 1� [::? ..:.-••.s��.®.s 2'ii;3- h-` •\`.f j....i'4;?!:ala.lKFct.,...ry..tYsr t'•f>-
N
Ea,
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: January 21, 2004
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & TOWN COUNCIL
FROM: Steven Faaborg, Senior Civil Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Ordinance No. (0)04-02 , Amending Chapter 11, Section 11-3-4 of the Code
of the Town of Oro Valley Pertaining to Speed Limits: Establishing the Speed Limit on
Innovation Park Drive.
SUMMARY: Innovation Park Drive (formerly known as Vistoso Commerce Loop) extends
south from Rancho Vistoso through an industrial and commercial area. Ultimately the
street will connect with Tangerine Road near the new hospital facility, for a total length of
approximately 1.25 miles. The street will be classified as a minor arterial street. Presently
the northern 0.87 miles has been constructed and is open to traffic.
The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, 1988 Edition
suggests that the following factors be considered when determining the proper numerical
value for a speed zone:
1. Road surface characteristics, shoulder condition, grade, alignment and sight
distance. Innovation Park Drive is 76' in width with a 20' median incorporating left turn
lanes as needed. The newly constructed pavement is asphalt with rolled curbs and
gutter. The grades, alignment and sight distances are consistent with a design speed
of 40 miles per hour.
2. The 85th-percentile speed and pace speed. A speed survey utilizing the Police
Department's "smart" trailer was not conducted for this area due to the incomplete
nature of the street.
3. Roadside development and culture, and roadside friction. The area is industrial
and commercial in nature. The area is expected to grow quickly as the hospital nears
completion. Intersecting streets are controlled and intersection visibility is good.
4. Safe speed for curves or hazardous conditions within the zone. Innovation Park
Drive has been constructed with curves and grades appropriate to a design speed of
40 miles per hour.
5. Parking practices and pedestrian activity. Off street parking has been and will be
required with site plans for construction in the area. An 8' sidewalk/bike path is
provided on both sides of the roadway.
6. Reported accident experience for a recent 12-month period. Public Works
Department does not have an accident history for the street during the last 12
months due to the incomplete nature of the roadway and low traffic volumes.
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION PAGE 2 OF 2
Based on these criteria, a 35 mile-per-hour speed limit would be justified for this area.
ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance No. (0)04 -02 , An ordinance of the Town of Oro Valley,
Arizona relating to speed limits; amending Oro Valley Town Code Section 11-3-4, "Speed
Limits;" repealing all resolutions, ordinances and rules of the Town of Oro Valley in
conflict therewith; preserving the rights and duties that have already matured and
proceedings that have already begun thereunder.
FISCAL IMPACT: Approximately $150 for installation of five signs, plus yearly
maintenance. The maintenance is funded from the Highway User Revenue Fund (HURF).
RECOMMENDATIONS OF STAFF: The Department of Public Works recommends
approval of Ordinance No. (0)04-02 , An ordinance of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona
relating to speed limits; amending Oro Valley Town Code Section 11-3-4, "Speed Limits;"
repealing all resolutions, ordinances and rules of the Town of Oro Valley in conflict
therewith; preserving the rights and duties that have already matured and proceedings
that have already begun thereunder.
SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve Ordinance No. (0)04-02 , An ordinance of
pp
the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona relating to speed limits; amending Oro Valley Town Code
Section 11-3-4, "Speed Limits;" repealing all resolutions, ordinances and rules of the
Town of Oro Valley in conflict therewith; preserving the rights and duties that have already
matured and proceedings that have already begun thereunder.
or
I move to deny Ordinance No. (0)04-02 , An ordinance of the Town of Oro Valley,
Arizona relating to speed limits; amending Oro Valley Town Code Section 11-3-4, "Speed
Limits;" repealing all resolutions, ordinances and rules of the Town of Oro Valley in
conflict therewith; preserving the rights and duties that have already matured and
proceedings that have already begun thereunder.
William Jansen, P.E., Engineer
Daniel Sharp, thief of Polifife
Ap. P/ $444ft
Chuck -ee 'o Manager
ORDINANCE NO. (0)04-02
AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY,
ARIZONA, RELATING TO SPEED LIMITS;
AMENDING ORO VALLEY TOWN CODE SECTION
11-3-4, "SPEED LIMITS;" REPEALING ALL
RESOLUTIONS, ORDINANCES, AND RULES OF
THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY IN CONFLICT
THEREWITH; PRESERVING THE RIGHTS AND
DUTIES THAT HAVE ALREADY MATURED AND
PROCEEDINGS THAT HAVE ALREADY BEGUN
THEREUNDER.
WHEREAS, on September 27, 1989, the Town Council did approve
Ordinance Number (0) 89-21, which adopted that certain document
entitled, "Oro Valley Town Code, Chapter 11, Traffic; Motor Vehicles," as
the eleventh chapter of the official Town Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Oro Valley Town Code Section 11-3-3,
"Traffic Control Devices," the Town Engineer or Chief of Police with the
approval of the Town Council shall place and maintain traffic control
devices deemed necessary to regulate traffic under the traffic laws of the
Town and State; and
WHEREAS, currently the Oro Valley Town Code Section 11-3-4(R)
designates a speed limit of 25 mph for Innovation Park Drive between
Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and Tangerine Road; and
WHEREAS, a review of the current engineering standards provides
that the appropriate speed limit for the above streets is thirty-five (35)
miles per hour; and
WHEREAS, the Town has deemed it necessary to amend Oro
Valley Town Code Section 11-3-4 to designate a thirty-five (35) mile per
hour speed limit for Innovation Park Drive between Rancho Vistoso
Boulevard and Tangerine Road to be in compliance with current
engineering standards and to preserve the peace, health, and safety and
welfare for drivers on of the roadways within the Town.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and the Council of
the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, as follows:
SECTION 1. Oro Valley Town Code Section 11-3-4(T) shall be inserted in
lieu thereof with additions being shown in ALL CAPS and deletions being
shown in Strikeout text:
Section 11-3-4 Speed Limits
(T) All other streets, roads and areas: 25 miles per hour.
(T) INNOVATION PARK DRIVE FROM RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD
TO TANGERINE ROAD: 35 MILES PER HOUR.
(U) All other streets, roads and areas: 25 miles per hour.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town
Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 21 s tday of January ,
2004.
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA
Paul H. Loomis, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Kathryn E. Cuvelier, Town Clerk Mark J. Langlitz, Town Attorney
Date Date
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: January 21, 2004
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL
FROM: Susana Montana, Planner II
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE NO. (0) 04-03 OV9-03-03, MR. BLAKE HASTINGS,
REPRESENTING CDO PARTNERS, SEEKS APPROVAL OF A ZONING
AMENDMENT FOR A 76.5 ACRE PORTION OF A 79.5 ACRE PARCEL, CHANGING
THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM MIXED USE (COMMERCIAL, MULTI-
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL AND CREATING NEW DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR THIS
NEW "SUB-AREA Z" OF THE ROONEY RANCH PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT
WHICH IS ACCOMPANIED BY A TENTATIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN SHOWING A
SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOME SUBDIVISION OF 152 LOTS ON THE
PROPERTY LOCATED EAST AND NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF FIRST
AVENUE AND LAMBERT LANE (PARCEL NO. 220-09-0160).
BACKGROUND:
The 290 acre Rooney Ranch area was annexed into the Town by Ordinance (0) 168 on July 27, 1988. On
February 8, 1989, by Ordinance (0) 89-2, (Case number OV9-89-6), the Town Council rezoned the property
from R1-144 to a Planned Area Development (PAD) called the "Rooney Ranch Oro Valley Center" Planned
Area Development (Rooney Ranch PAD). The PAD consists of nine sub-areas ranging in size from 1 acre to
113.40 acres. Area A includes 79.48 acres which is divided into four sub-areas (see Attachment 3 Area A Map):
1. Sub-area 1 is a 25.18 acre area designated for office and neighborhood retail uses;
2. Sub-area 2 is a 2.83 acre area designated for neighborhood recreation uses;
3. Sub-area 3 is a 21.86 acre area designated for multi-family residential use; and
4. Sub-area 4 is a 29.61 acre area designated for single-family residential use.
The 79.48 acre Area A is undeveloped and supports abundant native desert flora and fauna, including species
adapted to a desert riparian ecosystem. The site encompasses a variety of land forms as follows (see Attachment
4: Slope & Floodplain Map):
• rolling desert terrain with steep slopes exceeding 25 percent lie in the western, middle and eastern
portions of the site and are found in all subareas;
• a prominent ridgeline bisects the property approximately mid-point in a north-south direction and
extends into subareas 1, 2 and 3;
• approximately eight areas or "nodes" of relatively "flat" lands lying between steep- to-gently-sloping
hillsides are found in all subareas;
• floodplains (for both 100 year and 500 year floods) lie in the eastern and southern portions of the site
and lie within subareas 1, 3 and 4; and
• three washes, along with their 100 year flood limit drainageways, traverse the site in subareas 1, 3 and 4.
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2
SUMMARY:
The proposed 76.5 acre Project Site, called "Area Z", would provide 152 single-family homes. The existing
"Area A" allows -
sin lefamil homes only in the 29.6 acre "sub-area 4". In order to provide single family
single-family
homes throughout the 76.5 acre Project Site, a PAD amendment is required.
The remaining 3 acres of Area A would remain in its current commercial land use designation (please see
Condition number 15 of Exhibit A).
This report reflects an analysis of the Project based on the Project Description and Project impacts as described
in the Site Analysis of November 20, 2003 (Attachment 5). The proposed "Area Z" Development Regulations
and the accompanying Tentative Development Plan (TDP) constitute the "Project".
The concept of developing this site with only single-family homes is supported by staff. However, approval of
the Project in its present form (current Area Z development regulations in the text amendment and the current
TDP) would result in adverse impacts to the site and environs with regard to natural resource protection,
including hillside slopes and floodplains, and would not provide needed traffic circulation systems for the site
and environs. Staff has developed a set of conditions (shown in Exhibit A to this report) that were designed to
address those potential impacts and bring the Project into compliance with the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised
(OVZCR) standards and into conformity with the General Plan. Those conditions were recommended for
inclusion into the Project by the Planning Commission in their action of December 2, 2003, with the exception
of Condition numbers 11 and 17 which staff developed after the Commission hearing.
Issues
1. Hydrology/Drainage. The Project Application does not provide an adequate analysis of the Project to
both upstream and downstream watersheds (per OVZCR Section 3-104.A.4.e.3 & 4). Staff believes this
information is critical in determining (1) the suitability of development of 34 lots located within the CDO
floodplain (per the revised TDP); or (2) if those lots are developed, what on- and off-site mitigation measures
should be required as conditions of approval of the TDP to ensure that there are no adverse impacts to upstream
or downstream watersheds and related properties. Staff of the Pima County Flood Control District have
indicated that the Applicant has not provided adequate information for their review of the CLOMR application
(see Attachment 10).
2. Grading/Alteration of Natural Hillsides. The Project proposes development standards that would
remove about 4 acres of the site's natural slopes of 25% or greater. The proposed Area Z development
standards would allow cuts and fills of"up to 15 feet", although the accompanying revised TDP shows cuts of
up to 19 feet on four lots. Staff continues to recommend that the grading standards of Chapter 15 of OVZCR
apply to Area Z. This would restrict development in areas of 25% or greater slopes and limit unshielded cuts
and fills to 6 feet, or 8 feet with terracing.
3. Circulation. The Project proposes a vehicular cross-access road to the northern property which staff
believes is both inadequate in size and in the wrong location. A more suitable size and location would be a
collector street located west of the site's major north-south ridgeline. This would minimize cuts and grading on
both the Project site and the property to the north to accommodate this cross-access roadway (see traffic
considerations on page 4).
4. Major Amendment to TDP Review Process. The proposed Area Z development standards proposes a
Section H "Preliminary Plat Conformance with Planned Area Development (PAD) and Tentative Development
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 3
Plan (TDP)"which would allow the Applicant, or a subsequent buyer or developer, to submit a Preliminary Plat
for the site that does not conform to the approved TDP with regard to lot size, number of lots, street alignment,
drainage and grading of slopes without any requirement for review and approval by the Planning Commission or
Town Council. The Area Z Section H would exempt those changes by deeming them "not significant" and
automatically in conformance with the PAD and TDP. This provision circumvents the provision of Section 3-
104.C. of OVZCR which states "Any proposed changes to a Tentative Development Plan approved in
conjunction with a rezoning shall be submitted to the Zoning Administrator, who shall review the item and shall
ascertain whether or not the change is significant. If a change is determined to be significant, revised plans shall
be submitted for reconsideration by both the Planning Commission and Town Council." Pursuant to Sec. 3-
104.C, a significant change includes any change to the development standards or zoning conditions relating to
density standards, any kind of street or land improvement, and layout for vehicular circulation. As the
conditions listed in Exhibit A will result in a substantial redesign of the TDP, with the procedure proposed in
the PAD amendment, a major reconfiguration and design of the TDP would occur without Town Council
review.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The Proposed Project
The Applicant seeks to remove 76.5 acres of land from the Rooney Ranch PAD Area A and designate this land
as a new "Area Z" which would have new permitted uses and development standards. This Area Z proposal is
accompanied by a Tentative Development Plan that proposes a subdivision of single-family detached homes on
152 lots. These lots would be accessed from First Avenue at two locations: One at Lambert Lane and one about
1,200 feet north of the Lambert Lane and First Avenue intersection.
Drainage Considerations
The proposed design includes the following elements:
1. The western-most wash would be rerouted to allow for street and lot construction.
2. The middle wash would be filled in to allow for street and lot construction.
3. Flows from the middle wash would be rerouted to the eastern wash.
4. The eastern wash would be channelized.
5. All of the above will require US Army Corps of Engineers approval.
6. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) and a subsequent Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) of
the FEMA FIRM map are required to remove a portion of the site from the floodplain of the CDO.
7. Any modification to the western, middle and eastern washes must be done under the requirements of the
Town's Floodplain Management Ordinance.
8. Proposed drainage patterns would generally follow the existing drainage patterns.
9. Stormwater detention would be provided in various locations.
10. A storm sewer system is planned that would be supplemented with drainage channels.
11. The drainage design will impact upstream and downstream locations; the extent of this has not been
fully determined.
Pima County Flood Control District has reviewed the CLOMR submittal and, based on their review, they have
the following main issues:
1. FEMA freeboard requirements. The minimum freeboard requirements are 3-ft for levees and 4-ft for
levees upstream of bridges. The report as submitted does not provide documentation to determine the
freeboard depths before or after the floodplain encroachment.
2. Report review issues. The report lacked various items that are required to complete the review.
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
TOUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 4
3. Sediment transport. Pima County has requested that a sediment transport analysis be submitted that
demonstrates that the encroachment will not induce aggradation or degradation problems.
Grading Considerations
About 44 acres of the 76 acre site would be mass graded. The Applicant's consultant is recommending limiting
cuts and fills up to a 15-ft limit from existing grade. However, the TDP shows cuts up to 19-ft at lots 85, 86, 95
and 96. Driveway grades would most likely exceed the Town Code and Subdivision Street Standards on lots 78
through 88. Contour grading and terraced retaining walls are proposed in the Development Regulations to blend
the constructed grades back into the existing contours.
In summary, the revised Project includes the following features which conflict with General Plan policies and/or
the OVZCR Section 10-308 Required Findings for PADs:
1. The Project would fill the floodplain of the CDO Wash which may result in hazards to downstream
development in the event of a major storm (see Condition 2 of Exhibit A and Attachment 10);
2. The Project would remove about 4 acres of the site's natural slopes of 25% or greater and does not
provide an appropriate construction slope limit;
3. The Project does not provide an adequate cross-access collector street to the property to the north;
4. The Project does not provide a superior development than would be provided by conformance to the
following sections of OVZCR:
(A) Section 6-803, a generic R1-7 zoning district,
(B) to Chapters 10 (Hillside Development) and 15 (Grading) of OVZCR, and
(C) to Section 3-104.C.of OVZCR(procedures for changes); and
5. The Project does not conform to numerous General Plan policies intended to ensure a suitable
development for the property and environs (see Attachments 6 and 8).
Traffic Considerations
The final traffic impact report for this PAD amendment has been reviewed and approved by the Town
Department of Public Works. The Town Engineer has reviewed the TDP from two different scenarios, both of
which are preferable to the proposed TDP:
1. Island Scenario: This is similar to the applicant's proposal on page 1 of the TDP except that the
access to the north is removed so that there is no connection with the Kai-Capri property. (Note: The
proposed TDP shows a cross-access minor street connection on the northwest side of the
development near Lot 134, which is west of the ridgeline. This is in the wrong location and is
inadequate in size. As proposed, it would encourage cut-through traffic.)
2. Collector Cross-Access Scenario: This scenario would provide a collector street through the parcel
east of the site's prominent north-south ridgeline near Lot 55. This collector would provide a
connection from the Lambert-First intersection through the Kai-Capri property to Palisades Road.
Driveways would not be permitted to connect directly to the collector road; all connections would be
provided by subdivision streets.
The Town Engineer's preference is the Collector Cross-Access Scenario. The reason for preferring this is that it
provides a better overall area transportation network than the Island Scenario. The benefits are:
1. Lambert Lane is planned through the Pima Association of Governments as a major east/west arterial
road with an interchange connection to I-10.
2. Lambert Lane provides a link to La Cholla Boulevard which will have a possible interchange connection
to I-10.
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 5
3. The collector road will reduce the amount of traffic on First Avenue.
4. A traffic signal at First Avenue and Naranja Drive may not be warranted.
5. This collector road would reduce the traffic impact to Palisades Road at First Avenue by providing an
alternative route.
6. The area east of the north-south ridgeline (shown as lots 55 and 56 on the revised TDP)would be the
area that could best accommodate a cross-access collector street while minimizing grading and cuts into
slopes of 25% or greater on both properties and still provide level areas for the lay-out/siting of home
lots and residential streets connecting to this collector street.
Condition number 3 of Exhibit A describes the cross-access design that the Town Engineer can support.
Please also note that staff is also seeking a condition of approval (number 11 of Exhibit A) which would require
the Project property owner to provide the Town easements along First Avenue to complete the Town's First
Avenue Improvement Project.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
The rezoning application was submitted on May 2, 2003. Staff comments were sent on May 23, 2003. On
September 5, 2003, the Applicant submitted a substantially revised TDP to accompany the PAD text
amendment. This re-submittal, although containing all the sections required by OVZCR, did not provide staff
with sufficient information regarding potential (1) traffic circulation impacts; (2) floodplain impacts; and (3) the
Impacts of the loss of water recharge areas. Without this information, staff could not determine the potential
impacts of the development and could not formulate appropriate mitigating conditions of approval. Therefore,
staff felt compelled to recommend denial of the Project. However, in the event the Planning and Zoning
Commission sought to recommend to Council approval of the Project, with mitigating conditions, staff prepared
in Exhibit A to the November 4th case report, a set of conditions which would bring the Project into conformity
with the General Plan and into compliance with OVZCR.
On November 4, 2003, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on the Project. At the
hearing, prior to public comment or Commission deliberation, the Applicant's representative stated that the
Applicant would accept most of the conditions of Exhibit A. The Commission held the public hearing, closed
the public comment period, deliberated on the case, and continued the hearing to their December meeting to
allow the Applicant .to incorporate the conditions in Exhibit A into the PAD amendment and TDP. In a
November 20, 2003 submittal, the Applicant incorporated some of the conditions of Exhibit A into a revised
PAD text amendment ("Area Z Development Regulations") and a revised TDP. Staff presented a case report
analyzing the revised Project and, again, recommended denial based on continuing Project conflicts with the
General Plan and OVZCR. Although recommending denial of the Project, staff again presented the
Commission with a set of conditions that, if incorporated into the Project, would bring the Project into
conformity with the General Plan and OVZCR.
At the December 2, 2003 Commission hearing, the Applicant's representative explained that the Applicant
would agree to all but five of the staff-recommended conditions of approval. After deliberation, the
Commission voted unanimously (6 — 0) to recommend approval of the Project, provided that the Project
incorporates all of the staff-recommended conditions of approval attached to the December 2, 2003 case report.
Those conditions of approval are reflected in Exhibit A to this case report.
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 6
RECOMMENDATION:
Planning staff supports the concept of restricting the uses of the new Area Z to single-family residential.
Though the use meets the uses envisioned in the adopted General Plan and is thus supported, the following
items need to be rectified in the PAD and TDP:
1. The Project does not conform with General Plan policies intended to ensure a suitable development for
the property and environs (see Attachments 6, 7 and 8);
2. The Project would fill the floodplain of the CDO Wash which may result in hazards to upstream and
downstream development in the event of a major storm;
3. The Project would remove portions of the Site's natural slopes of 25% or greater;
4. The Project does not provide a cross-access collector street, at a proper location, to the property to the
north; and
5. The Project does not provide a superior development than an R1-7 conventional zoning district
designation and would provide lesser review than OVZCR for major changes to the TDP; this does not
meet the expectations of Section 10-308 of OVZCR (see Attachment 7).
While the proposed uses are supported, the PAD amendment, even with the aforementioned items addressed as
conditions of approval, is not supported because it would trigger a substantial redesign of the TDP. Ideally, a
TDP design, meeting the conditions described in Exhibit A, should be reviewed prior to approval of the PAD
amendment.
dowever, should the Council wish to recommend approval of the Project, the conditions listed in Exhibit A to
this report would address the above-referenced issues and would bring the Project into compliance with OVZCR
and into conformity with the policies of the General Plan. Please note that the Conditions of Exhibit A include
all of the conditions recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission plus condition numbers 11 and 17.
SUGGESTED MOTIONS:
I move to deny Ordinance No. (0) 04-0 OV9-03-03, based on elements of the Project that do not comply with
OVZCR and that do not conform to policies of the General Plan.
OR
I move to approve Ordinance No. (0) 04-03, OV9-03-03, with the conditions listed in Exhibit A to this report
which would bring the Project into compliance with OVZCR and into conformity with the General Plan.
OR
I move to approve Ordinance No. (0) 04-03, OV9-03-03, with the conditions listed in Exhibit A to this report as
well as the following conditions which would bring the Project into compliance with OVZCR and into
conformity with the General Plan:
OR
I move to approve Ordinance No. (0) 04- 03 , OV9-03-03 based on the following
findings
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Exhibit A
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 7
2. Ordinance No. (0) 04-03
3. Area A Map
4. Slope and Floodplain Map;
5. Proposed Area A Amendment: "Site Analysis, Tentative Development Plan and Development Regulations
for Rooney Ranch Area Z", dated (revised)November 20, 2003
6. 1996 General Plan Analysis of the proposed Project
7. Section 10-301 and 10-308, PAD Findings Analysis
8. Section 10-307, PAD General Plan Criteria Analysis
9. Comparison of current PAD development standards and proposed Amendments
10. October 23, 2003 letter to the Town from the Pima County Department of Transportation and Flood Control
District
11. Required Roadway Improvement Easement Exhibit
F:\OV\OV9\2003\9-03-03\Reports\Dec PZC Report.doc
a...34_ /0312._.=
Planning .d Zonin Administrator
/;611. )1,2_,
---- , IJA,:,
Community Development Director
„,---', „--(
r 1
i I / g,----.44-- /4 t ,,„.-
I 4 AAA i .
ti
Town Manager
0V9-03-03, Rooney Ranch PAD Area A Amendment Attachment 1
Exhibit A: Conditions to Bring the Project into Conformity with the General Plan,
The following conditions of approval, if incorporated into the Project, would positively address policies of the
General Plan and a Tentative Development Plan (TDP) which conforms to these standards would also conform
top olicies of the General Plan. Please note that the TDP accompanying this rezoning action (0V9-03-03) is
' ' apprsubjectoval,
to all of the conditions described below. Compliance with some of the conditions of appro ,
particularlyrelated to grading, protection of slopes of 25% or greater, circulation, and floodplain issues, are
likely require uire a significant changeAny s
to the TDP. ignificant change to the TDP shall be subject to the
q
review and recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and the review and approval of the Town
Council, as described in Section 3-104.0 and any other applicable provisions of OVZCR.
1. The Development Standards shall incorporate all the provisions of OVZCR Chapters 10 and 15.
2. The following conditions, A through C, shall be included in the General Notes of the TDP on Sheet One
as General Note number 2:
"A. The portion of the property lying within the CDO floodplain shall not be developed until and
unless the Town Engineer is satisfied that the homes are no longer in the floodplain and there are
sufficient mitigation measures to insure that there are no adverse impacts to upstream or
downstream watersheds or related properties. The CLOMR report for any development of the
property shall be submitted and accepted by FEMA prior to the submittal of a Preliminary Plat to
the Town.
B. The developer shall be responsible to mitigate all upstream and downstream impacts due to
floodplain encroachment into the three local washes onsite and the Canada Del Oro Wash.
C. Any modifications to the site's western, middle and eastern washes must be done pursuant to the
requirements of the Town's Floodplain Management Ordinance."
3. The TDP shall provide a cross-access street to the property to the north. This cross-access street shall be
in the form of a collector street that conforms to the Subdivision Street Standards.
4. The Town's First Avenue Road Improvement Project will include 10-ft wide shoulders / bikes lanes on
each side of the street. Right turning vehicles can utilize these lanes / shoulders. Therefore, northbound
right turn lanes will not be required.
5. The developer shall be responsible for installing southbound left turn lanes at the First Avenue/Lambert
intersection, and at the First Avenue and the northern access / frontage road intersection. It is
recommended that the developer post in-lieu fees so that they become part of the Town's First Avenue
Road Improvement Project.
6. The developer shall be responsible for the modification of the traffic signal at the intersection of First
Avenue and Lambert Lane.
7. The 3 acre commercial property on the south-west corner of the property shall have access off the
proposed street opposite Lambert Lane. No direct access to First Avenue will be approved.
8. Where terrace walls are to be used they shall be limited to one eight foot bench between two eight foot
retaining walls.
9. The Applicant shall address OVZCR Sections 3-104.4.e.3 and 4 in the Hydrology section of Part H of
the site analysis.
10. The developer shall coordinate all improvements on First Avenue with the Town's First Avenue
Improvement Project.
11. The developer shall provide all easements required for the Town's First Avenue Improvement Project as
depicted on Attachment 11 at no cost to the Town of Oro Valley. All required easements required have
been circled in a heavy black line on the three half size preliminary plans of Attachment 11.
12. The driveways for lots 78 to 88 shall be placed on the high side of the lot. If a driveway slope of 14% in
the right-of-way or 20% outside the right-of-way cannot be maintained, the lots will be considered
unbuildable.
13. The following changes to the Area Z Development Regulations shall be made:
A. Subsection "h" of C. Architectural Design Guidelines, 1. Residential Design shall state: "Two-
story homes shall be restricted as follows: (i) No more than two shall be built adjacent to each
other along major streets; (ii) No more than three shall be built adjacent to each other along
interior streets; and (iii) Two-story homes shall not be built on corner lots."
B. Subsection "k" of C. Architectural Design Guidelines, 1. Residential Design shall be deleted as it
is duplicative of subsection"f'; then re-name subsequent subsections.
C. Section E. Grading shall be amended to state"OVZCR Chapters 10 and 15 shall apply."
D. Section H. Preliminary Plat Conformance with Planned Area Development (PAD) and Tentative
Development Plan (TDP) shall be amended to state "Any changes to the Tentative Development
Plan shall follow the provisions of Section 3-104.C, and any other applicable provisions of
OVZCR."
E. Section J. Outdoor Lighting, Subsection 1 shall be amended to include the number "17" after the
word"Chapter" in the first sentence.
14.Part II of the Site Analysis, Section II-K, Development Criteria, on page 16, shall be amended to state
"except on lots viewed from North First Street which shall be limited to 18 feet" after the category
"Building Height Proposed, 26 feet".
15.The Rooney Ranch PAD shall be amended throughout to reflect the appropriate changes to Area A and
to include an underlying zoning designation for the 3 acre remnant Area A which should state:
"Underlying Zoning: The underlying zoning, pursuant to the requirement of Section 10.302.C.1 of the
OVZCR is C-1 (Commercial) District."
16. The Applicant shall provide a new legal description for the remnant Area A as well as a new legal
description for the new Area Z.
17. The following statement shall be included as General Note number 1 of the TDP on Sheet One:
"Compliance with some of the conditions of approval of Ordinance (0) 04- , OV9-03-03, particularly
related to grading, protection of slopes of 25% or greater, circulation, and floodplain issues, may require
significant change to the TDP. Any significant change to the TDP shall be subject to the review and
recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and the review and approval of the Town
Council, as described in Section 3-104.C. and any other applicable provisions of OVZCR."
OV9-03-03 Attachment 2
ORDINANCE NO. (0) 04-03
AN ORDINANCE TO REZONE A PORTION OF THE ROONEY RANCH ORO
VALLEY CENTER PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT (PAD) TO CREATE A
NEW SUB-AREA Z COMPRISED OF DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND A
TENTATIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN LOCATED ON 76.5 ACRES WHICH WAS
FORMERLY LOCATED WITHIN AREA A OF THE PAD, AND MAKING
CORRELATIVE CHANGES TO THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY ZONING MAP:
AND REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH;
WHEREAS, On February 8, 1989,by Ordinance No. (0) 89-2, the Town Council
rezoned the 290 acre Rooney Ranch from the Town's R1-144 (Single Family Residential)
District to the Rooney Ranch Oro Valley Center Planned Area Development, comprised
of nine sub-areas; and
WHEREAS, the 79.48 acre Area A was one of the PAD sub-areas and Area A was
divided into four sub-areas designated for development of varying uses and densities; and
WHEREAS,the 79.48 acre Area A, Parcel No. 220-09-0160, allowed the development
of single-family detached homes in only one 29.6 acre "sub-area 4); and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Article 3-1 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised
(OVZCR), the owner(s) of the land requested an amendment to the Rooney Ranch PAD
to create a new "Area Z" on 76.5 acres of Area A which would allow the development of
single-family, detached homes sought on the entire 76.5 acres with its own development
standards and Tentative Development Plan; and
WHEREAS, on November 4, 2003 and again on December 2, 2003, at duly noticed
public hearings, the Planning and Zoning Commission considered the rezoning request
(0V9-03-03) to create a new "Area Z"within the Rooney Ranch Oro Valley Center
Planned Area Development; and
WHEREAS, on December 2, 2003 the Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously
(6—0) to recommend that the Town Council approve the PAD amendment rezoning
request provided that the conditions recommended by staff and listed in Attachment 1 to
the December 2, 2003 case report be included in the Council's action as conditions of
approval; and
WHEREAS,the Oro Valley Town Council has considered the requested PAD
Amendment rezoning at a duly noticed public hearing and finds the proposal with the
inclusion of the conditions of approval listed in Exhibit A to the January 21, 2004 case
report, is consistent with the Town's General Plan and Ordinances.
OV9-03-03 Attachment 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND TOWN
COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY:
SECTION 1. That the Town of Oro Valley Zoning Map be amended to reflect the
changes to Area A and the new Area Z of the Rooney Ranch Oro Valley Center Planned
Area Development(PAD), and the zoning designation be amended for a portion of Parcel
number 220-09-0160 by designating a new Area Z within the PAD with the uses and
standards established within the Rooney Ranch Area Z Site Analysis, Tentative
Development Plan, and Development Regulations revised November 18,2003 as
modified by the conditions set forth in Exhibit A to this Ordinance.
SECTION 2. That all ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith, and the
same are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict.
SECTION 3. That this ordinance and the various parts thereof are hereby declared to be
severable. If any section, sub-section, sentence, clause,word or phrase of this ordinance
is, for any reason, held to be unconstitutional, such holdings shall not affect the validity
of the remaining portion of this ordinance.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Town Council of the Town of Oro Valley,
Arizona, this 21st day of January, 2004.
ATTEST:
Katheryn E. Cuvelier, Town Clerk Paul H. Loomis, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Mark Langlitz, Town Attorney
Area Z Boundary Line
I e
I▪ .
...
s . .
■
I
Area A_
•i
• ._.
. , . .
■
.
�bArea
i
.
•
.
•••.
■
AreaA
s• . -
.
SubArea4
2.
a
Area
t . .
SubArea3 .
• ■
, .
* .
. .
,....... . Area A I
SubAreal . -- . .,_ .
.
�®_ .. .,
C
,_..
..,_ .,
. ... -
Area . .
.
.„- ,., .
1::., • . . .
,:.,
..,., „ .
41:
■
I .
Area l !ea3 #�0
® - 0
i tee*
• o'tO iv __colse®UIa®I®®I®a`
•
■
:40)- _ -- ■
ON
s •.i q
■ ,AreaWash
■
•.
, ..
. _.
■
.
.
.
■
■
.
o /
•
•
AreaQ . ,
A/4
. ,,, \
_ _
,."4P:a,.. 0V9 - 03 - 03 M a 3 0 125 250 500 Feet
` ,..=.. .�.�■ Ro1 1 1 1 1 1 1
oril
}-"?' "-- L—.
? .' - L s i oney Ranch Area PAD Sub ea Bountlaries
�' , tom.
Map Produced by Oro Valley GIS Services
y rY7
r p.-. s
i**Nii.110:31,,, , _t* .,,,,jr.4. .a!",41,,,, , ',--,1.1... .' '71-;,.•.:e 4,.._,.,' 1*..-,r-rf*Ift . •A' 'VP' -,-.4 , si....,', - .
r
,.. .,.. ,. ,........,„-,,... .. ,-..-, ..,,:_ 414' 41 Z 1 t ' 's
ilk ti‘Pqh-. •0* ..' -...01.,..,7-1,-, •.. ?.- ...- .6 -fs,.....,;. - s ' .,,i -s""••is'....t--'4 -,',,' ---L__,,,H-''' -,tit:seliii,;:,t=' •• ,tiki 4,1,.19r*, : ---',' zo t
„,:„• .,,..„„-.I i-,eN t 4..,,.. , .. 4, 11:111r At, •A it .
* --. -oittittAaril•,.. , Iii.g.... 4.;-,,, •. -' vir,,,,ir , . - • ,,,,-•.',. ,• :%,,. --,•'' .41,---7,,,,,; • IL;41-1.41:.,. .---‘.., -a*. All,— r-iiii w ..., -... 4. ' is
'd--.., . e i..ii,-- •
,. 4-,,:- ..!
..,-.7.-f.' „,
- ...-•).4:i,'.: .
i .� „•a!'r k Ail//4 *II...".
4.-may• f 4�'-1:•, ,/11,:,.
4 3 IN' -_ '?-'k _ e ".1 _� * stet.* ..
a Ifki4d
Ill
,y r 4e4 r !1 •• j.+1 -i!! r 0 ! e' .r T• 'L.i - r f �i -! ` , 1!
tet, _ ::..
Eti
. _ sK ti.,7`'# � . y �► i a,R►, +► 04 _ �'�' !�`4'7-''� f alt's
a •
A-.t..N.L'IR.,,L_ .
••
:Y. ► F'^tom° ,l r.'/ t1111� .i! •`.I .. s `.' , -_ it. >. , 10. yy. �. - .. _ .�'• ,�w
>:. `: + ( ,' 4 '''. Illi,g.*14.1941. ir,,_'' . ' .... b..,*�1 + ! t', _' +jam ',n: t. S i` #r ,e..1
�Z�.s•
7 _ . i i;.
't alike,,,,,4.
6• 07 ii.
si ,- *--.,‘,.. lir -- * -.,
i' :� i i
ii '`' •"
' '• tglii.0AL litr;;tili t '.•ar te,....
. .,,„.-. ,,.... ...-
: ,...., 4{‘i-, ,. .., ,. -,1
y
y
+
.:111%,, . 4.:, tr4.4110, i. 4..., ,,..-
.' 10, '.,,,„ a." . ..,... 41,::... -i,,,,,..k.,.4, ii,,,,,;.7,,,,,..4,---.- s -'-.: - . ..- A .
.. --, -,- , -..,,r_:_.7" ., ..,F4,-
2, - 1!,,..--,,'IL4011 '- •... .-.44•• .,....,. ..., - ..,... „„ . * .4,.._v....,; .,•....,. '
xi':
±►` '4 t' 4 ; A —, `'4 ,' r_ ��uo❑
i
•
IL7C1'�CICC7CC �r© -
r. �.dt occi til.
IE ,� . -t IRA* -,.....1„ ,„ ,,i,..,, ,.,,„...,,,..._: ,,,,
_ r.,.:,.. , A..'
--.1`?,e,ti*it, . _.;,i ,.1.. .4, -,,,, (c., -- A- .4
. •d . ., -,,,:;.• .., ..,.:-,,,,,1.••. .I IC
y�,f4 r y
_
I
- .. jR -�.' - -' 8 Area eAv- :, : . .7 r!.' - *it '.1.*" 7-'"'s 4, -*4.,She
...,.,:
i.
4.. ;:-.. - ,a ,..„.„-- -.Ai . 6:-....t.,,,,,,,, ,&A....,..*,-.- 4.Idlif -.
".1101":."
' A -. a-A;•i A u b A re a...sp.-4.-,,,,,,,,„ , :- l' °' 4.. '•--•'- -... ''': 44'.4 i, t'aP frf. it_"74,44t., ir---..110, '.' -
a"; it No;�11 „ ~4 ,~ .. t v •. +•
1 - --........,„„iii........1-i„,,44., , .. _•. „ <,<,,ya ,-.., ,:* -. „ 04*-' .4,-' • n it .,.‘ si'.,..:k*,•..1'.2.„,,,, 441 t -1.,4., . 0...
u- -ii,... si
pi:
1 t t',..?,4 .R,` ,,:-; • -• .1�1/ .if i.�.,b ;w n 4P,. tli‘Plitt,t x# ".":,illi til,-'Ti�..'' - . ;a r ' '
. .7 t-"*.a**,.,:*,::',4,air-,e,.•i:4k.-4°•. &.4r,..„.',...- --- -, ,-... ,.„-„ - 7 •,--- .s'..,,,‘ , ......-,..4..;-,,--0. ,....--1.,,,c.er_e-ti:- .,.,-...,-..-..,•---,., ----.I.: : - ,, .„.- --, ,-„,, E. :.,. to
34, A ...,.: ,:il,...:‘,...v
,11..5,1,-, . --
?5, -,::„.. -
rs,, . .
,. ,„-
. . • I-1
q. *qtr .. �' ,• •# .�b x. 4.... ..... ......„ . ,4t• .-- . . ,4; ,'1. Area A. "., . • U
,.1
W riiiipT jici.--,11,_, .1 1..--tr.,7,...!,, '4.. ..,
, 1,i •tL "",'N'....',..klii7..ii4t4i ' AA 4% " a, 4:., 7 ' fai'' 1.'4"fial.14-iiii t‘ie.'i 0:..' e A e a 4 - , - * .
0 ‘0,4*•.,.-1--...-Coir-.-..,•,,,T4' -Iv ,. .. , :, .\ t. - 2 ,... -..ft'„,,- 4.- PIC iliCzt.iii.v.ii-74 -is ---'.-..,.. -.4t4A' ' ' ' '. -i'
* o.• jr,+�, :..�0� r y_ir - .+j wt'01'. Ni'tit "-0, .-• '`•
'6 iii- ;^a i e Area A 4 'Q�`�+l+`*#. '• " t• i, rash -d • *�
!,' -:-
• ��' SubArea3
1101 • '', r w fi 4440
11
• -.„.•ipt3,•.,,-• td ir A. :-,,,, -41 -,::: 1.„ -.4,...4./- #.ij......... li 4,-.{; . 4..4,, -,,t• ''',...• *'.. -..t. tie'. i's-ec• - , —,, ig
.. .
- li:.
1.1*-: ;'' •-..' 44111w,* qt.' n..416,.‘.4'.AILI:1‘°;:,..t.:. 41'1.: r ',. 4, ,.. - . ....-: ft .. 4,41.
i � Area ., -.,+ 1, A ' ° r•". ;;,7 . •* t` its' 1'-.
r� ... Ika i 1.. -•'•! ©♦ T 0.• ,. 4 L• •.R �. � ❑A
r9 ht ' \ , SubArea1
0 i ' , ...:-- 17 1 # '. -4.1..".. ' i'-4 it,-,'4 11' L, -i .., • ..4, , • , 4, ,,,,,,-- •
f r
0
., '0-',. ' .r. \ '0''' 4 1.-----' „ ,::,,',., f fr„„„--,, ,./>" , _.• Is' .f. . -170.--.. : '41- _„?.,' ' ,44'.4- ,..*,- : - 41 ,,,,,,, i
4Y•
A -I,. „le,
7 .,-,,,,...,, 4* * • * :%*$ r . i'llir ' gir 'falti iii i * 1 i
Li '. .i, .".,,—. .4- , e ..11.-1,.*,-;.. .4' •-.' .,,•''' 11," Q" 47-41. * . bit .A ft ", _elk. ir- 9
R -‘., ;.--.-: N....,i, ,, ,..-.-, .:-....-*:-,, -,- . -, - '' .„41., .ii • 7,, ... t.....-,,,,-7,,,' . • ..., , p, • ,
11,i '‘f,:,••,: Ni,vilk, '4,L, - ',ip••r P i .., :‘, , .4,. ,. ., ill
CI
• ' .. 0' • t• ' '' L , . . -'.l' 4117 -i 4 - a.c. i'i 4ir ,p . 0
ti
is
..: ., ...,,,, 04,,,,t,,, , 4, ,,_
.„.,,,,,w, ir ,:,1 _ 0
,„,e'r - '' - - -- 1.1
❑ re • , , _.- ! si if. ., .. , ,, . a , Ile'4141114 . ' c_-_,
❑ .. • .c , .6' 4.- -y.mss 7, ' R ulY.
rr
ir
-.-- N4 - 5
r
9991ed� ....-„z,L
�/
br'- 'A' e a -12
FSubArea ..„-.i..41., :;-,ipie
1M Q�
• •
440 . A '* . ).(>.-'.'''''
a ft,.* • ,,,,.,>,Q. i II:,
41,:,...-7:-'.1. • 4• 4 ,;;7,8, 0. .,,,„,,', ,:, _ ' 4. , •• - ,,i,e-
[0 - .. . ' ,.et.,' ' ' 4 I ? r ,cP/> .''''",,2
il . ,.. ,..4P... ,,,,,9' , ltiii.tbs., att;.' fr '
� IP' ,,Q‘'",-, ,..:4:24., ,. 1,..
Go • •
,: -. ► Ateu,"
* Itiit, ens. , GTT.,'II*41.04,4'sq.*:1 c)II''., ' G
d ,...„.„,.-,-..-...c.„ p,pi \
• rir, „.
�� < .:• '. # �. • 4 ;,,. '; t., ,:fr, 1„, , „r e,ma - , ••
Cl
❑❑ G0 ,! N ', A -41,..--,,,,..-,;:--, 1� !. ...:. ❑
rt"ril •- ---i` - 1.: -.4 ..S, '..'...)i: _,., 'ity ' ".:: ;41:.04 *,,figr
acielermocicc
ip w . AO w. ......,-, ,--
O' it
.41/21‘ • 0 ;I,''F
•
,.,,: - .411> 0,. . ,.,,, ._ 'lit', .1
❑ ' ;., :' .,11.,.Wash
u,- mo ,. . ,,,,, E._
•C,'' ' . kt ,\:, -401 •*
u ,• . r,• . . , ••,... ?At: .-, ---, -4,414, 41-13:• * Er0 1:i * *. , - r r A It ....--- G \t
n
❑ F� �t G`/
).,-.‘,.,..), :-,---- ,r
U �� _ .�\ `'',�d ,4, T` "h •�• �, , �i, �� \./ _ "" .'•' 11
•pt
. _ .\, tom. S 7 "' ,.., • �•. %,.....„
�'�• +J ;. 4;4-
,
Li .
0 . #00# .....or .v.r. , .'Joe, .a' , „.. ., •;..,%. ,, i •-, Nit:, a., - ,,,,9 ' - t'' A
Li 1 i,-;Fa. ,,, lief., gift. ,_.,.,.. ... _• , . :-...,•• •
5
.-.r.
0 ,. ,, .,„„, pp j,.•- :,
. }t v, 7 • OIf ,r� r e
.\ •', ' t 4. �Q'
❑ \ . .gam. . i '; � . ./F-CS'
. �o
. -- - ' - -.•
- ,
n," fr.#
: • ' ,.--- v.- : ,ii*,,,-,,,:v -' .,0
, ,. ,,,„, ,,
.. ....
,,c)</
r .r , o ,
.„,,,, - do- :., ... , . 411P4'.
P.'"-'74, /''°44,
ARi
��o�f- ?otic
Rooneya n C 1I E) 1� a 0 1251 1 1 1 1 250 500 Feet
I ..'■ SubAreaBoundaries 100 YarFlood Pn1111
�� 9500 Year Flood Plain III25%SandeandGreater Map Produced by Oro Valley GIS Services
SITE ANALYSIS, TENTATIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
ROONEY RANCH AREA Z
Property Owner:
Canada del Oro Partners
401 South Boston Avenue
Suite 2400
Tulsa, OK 74103-4010
0V9-03-03
May 2, 2003
Revised September 5, 2003
Revised November 18, 2003
WLB Na. 181057-N-001
For clarification of material contained in this report, contact:
Charles Hulsey, Vice President
Robert G. Longaker III, Project Manager
THE WLB GROUP, INC.
4444 East Broadway Boulevard
Tucson, Arizona 85711
(520) 881-7480
L:1181057\Parcel A\Site Analysis and Application\Text\Site Analysis Area A.doc V,ral
FP
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. AREA Z DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
II. SITE ANALYSIS
PART I - INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS
Introduction 1
A. Existing Land Uses 1
1. Site Location 1
2. Existing Land Uses —Onsite 1
3. Existing Adjacent Land Uses 4
4. Well Sites 4
B. Topography 4
1. Topographic Characteristics 4
2. Average Cross Slope 5
C. Hydrology 7
1. Offsite Watersheds 7
2. Offsite Natural or Man-Made Features 7
3. 100-Year Discharges Greater Than 100 cfs 7
4. Onsite Hydrology 7
5. Downstream Drainage Conditions 8
D. Soils 8
1. Arizo Riverwash Complex#34 8
2. Pinaleno-Nickel-Palo Verdes Complex#28C 8
E. Utilities 9
1. Sewers 9
2. Water 9
3. Dry Utilities 9
F. Schools 9
G. Recreation and Trails 9
H. Wildlife 10
{. Traffic 10
Site Analysis and Tentative Development Plan i
pW 1.4111
Rooney Ranch Area Z
WLB No. 181057-N-001
September 5, 2003
TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED)
PART II - LAND USE PROPOSAL
A. Project Overview 12
B. Tentative Development Plan 12
C. Existing Land Uses 13
D. Topography 13
E. Hydrology 13
F. Sewers 14
G. Water 14
H. Schools 14
Recreation and Trails 15
J. Wildlife 16
K. Development Criteria 16
L. Visual Impact Analysis 16
M. Traffic 17
EXHIBITS
A. Location Map 2
B. Aerial Photograph 3
C. Architectural Styles Within 1/4 Mile of Subject Property 6
D. Trail Locations 11
E. Visual Analysis Photo Locations 18
F-O. Visual Analysis Photos 'A' — `J' 19-28
P. Offsite Watersheds 29
APPENDICES
Appendix A. Tentative Development Plan (6 sheets) (24" x 36")
Appendix B. Tentative Development Plan (6 sheets) (11" x 17")
Appendix C. Tentative Development Plan (single sheet) (24" x 36")
Appendix D. CFPO Surveys
Appendix E. Cultural Resources Survey
Appendix F. Traffic Impact Analysis
Site Analysis and Tentative Development Plan 11 T fL�
'iroup •
Rooney Ranch Area Z
WLB No. 181057-N-001
September 5, 2003
AREA Z DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
Amendment for Area A of the Rooney Ranch Oro Valley Center PAD
This amendment for Area A of the Rooney Ranch Oro Valley Center PAD (the
"Amendment") affects all of Area A, except for a 3-acre portion of property as depicted in
Exhibit A ("Amendment Area"). The parcel subject to the Amendment will be known hereafter
as Area Z. Where not specifically superseded by this Amendment, the Rooney Ranch Oro
Valley Center PAD applies.
All references to sub-areas for the Amendment Area are deleted, and the following
regulations apply to all sub-areas within the Amendment Area.
The underlying zoning,pursuant to the requirement of Section 10.302.C.1 of the Oro
Valley Zoning Code Revised(OVZCR) is R1-7.
A. Uses:
1. Primary Uses: Uses shall be restricted to single-family residential with associated
recreational facilities.
2. Secondary Uses: Homeowners' association facilities, model homes, temporary
real estate sales and marketing facilities, construction trailer, and construction of
single-family homes and related improvements.
B. Development Criteria:
1. Lot Sizes. The minimum lot size shall be 5,000 square feet.
2. Minimum Lot Width: 45 feet.
3. Setbacks from property line:
• Front: 10 feet, except that there shall be a minimum of 20 feet between the
edge of the sidewalk closest to the house to the front of the garage to allow for
vehicles to park in driveway without protruding into the sidewalk.
• Rear: 15 feet.
• Side: 5 feet, except that all buildings not attached shall be at least 10 feet
apart.
• Corner lots shall have a side yard setback of 10 feet.
• Lots with rear yard abutting side yard shall be discourages. However, where
it occurs, lots whose side property line about the rear property line of another
adjacent lot shall have a side yard setback of 10 feet. This setback applies to
only the side impacted by the rear lot of the adjacent lot. In this instance,
vegetation shall be planted to provide for a continuous screen six feet in
height and located between the rear and side property lines.
149171.1
• No buildings may be positioned to impede property driving site angles or
other driving safety requirements.
• Each dwelling shall, in addition to any garages, have at least two full off-street
parking spaces having dimensions of no less than 9 feet by 20 feet and not
encroaching on any part of the right-of-way.
4. Building Heights: Single-family dwelling units shall not exceed 26 feet in height
with the exception that dwelling units visible from North First Avenue shall be
limited to one-story and a maximum height of 18 feet. Dwelling units north of the
northro ert line of Lot 139 on the Tentative Development Plan (revised
p p Y
11/18/03) are permitted to be 26 feet in height. When the natural cross-slope is
under 6%, the building height shall mean the vertical distance measured from the
grade found along the outside walls of a building to the highest point of the
building, excluding any chimney. If the natural cross-slope is 6% or more, the
building height shall mean the maximum vertical distance measured from natural
grade to the highest point of the building directly above, excluding chimneys.
5. Maximum Density: The maximum number of units is 229.
6. Recreational Facilities:
a. A minimum of two acres of improved recreational facilities shall be
provided. These facilities shall be located where designated on the
Tentative Development Plan ("TDP"), although additional recreational
areas and facilities may be provided elsewhere when approved by the
Town's Development Review Board ("DRB").
b. Recreational facilities shall be appropriate to the needs and desires of the
residents,particularly with respect to age group and level of activity. Both
active and passive recreational facilities shall be provided. Where there is
active recreation, a water fountain shall be provided. Tot lots and
associated seating areas shall have shade structures.
c. Recreational areas and facilities shall be distributed proportionately
throughout the site. These recreational areas shall be connected by either
sidewalks(as depicted in the roadway cross-section) or trails.. Motorized
vehicles are prohibited on these trails or within the recreation areas.
d. The development shall provide connection to Trail Number 328 (as
identified in the Oro Valley Trails Task Force Report). This trail shall be
a minimum of 15 feet wide, shall be noted on the plat as a non-motorized
public recreation trail and shall be dedicated to the Town of Oro Valley.
149171.1
C. Architectural Design Guidelines.
1. Residential Design.
a. Residential structures and community features shall be coordinated in
architectural materials, details and quality. Community features include recreational
facilities and pedestrian access features.
b.Colors used on any buildings in the residential area shall not exceed 50%
reflectivity value.
c. Building mass is probably the most prominent design feature of a project. The
design of residential units should avoid long, unbroken building facades without the
use of offsets as an integral part of the facade design.
d.Garage design shall comply with Section 16-1 of the OVZCR, and shall not consist
of more than 50% of the total building frontage. Garages shall not project more than
five (5) feet in front of a house and the house must have an entry feature or porch to
moderate the visual impact of the garage.
e. Chimneys shall be compatible in materials to the accompanying structure.
f. Lots that face the same street shall not feature the same or similar building front
elevation unless there is a separation of a minimum of three lots in between those
same or similar front elevations.
Where this PAD does not address a particular design criteria, the standards and
g.
guildelines of Chapter 16 of the OVZCR shall apply,particularly as they relate to
garage size,bulk and relation to the street and the varying of lot width and
building setbacks with a block face (street frontage segment).
h. Add language from Bayer(l0w)regarding varying front yard setback.
i. Parking comply with Chapter 27 of the OVZCR, except that each dwelling
unit shall, in addition to any garages,have at least two full size parking spaces
having dimensions of no less than 9 feet by 20 feet and not encroaching on any
part of the right-of-way.
j. The setbacks for the houses shall vary so that no two units are equally aligned.
k. The same elevation and floor plan shall not be repeated on the same street
frontage without at least a three lot separation.
1. All roof mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from view and the
color of roofing materials will blend in with the landscape.
149171.1
m. Any vents and chimneys must terminate per manufacturer listing and are subject
to review by Planning and Zoning and the Town Building Official. A cap must be
placed over the spark arrestor.
2. Roofs.
a.Roofs shall be colored to blend with surrounding geology.
b.A range of roof forms and roof pitch adds an appealing visual context to the
community/streetscape.
D. Landscaping:
1. OVZCR Chapter 14 shall apply to all landscaping with the following additions:
2. There shall be a 25-foot landscaped bufferyard along the North First Avenue
alignment of Area Z.3. 15% of the gross land area shall be provided as
meaningful open space. Meaningful open space is defined as natural desert,
common areas that are landscaped, and recreation areas.
E. Grading:
1. OVZCR Chapters 10 and 15 shall apply, except that cuts and fills of up to 15 feet
shall be permitted and Section 15-405 shall not apply.
2. Standards. The following gradinstandards (demonstrated in graphic format in
Exhibits B-E) apply to Area Z:
a. The general thrust of the grading concept is to utilize contour grading and
landscaping techniques in the creation of cut slopes to achieve appearances that
emulate natural, undisturbed slopes.
b. All disturbed areas with 3:1 slopes or less will be re-vegetated or
landscaped to control dust and stabilize the slope. The intent is to restore
disturbed slopes to a condition that emulates the pre-disturbed condition. The
methodology used shall be consistent with the requirements as outlined in Exhibit
E. This methodology involves planting disturbed slopes with a minimum of
12 trees, 30 shrubs and 35 accents per every 10,000 square feet of graded area.
c. Long slopes may be designed to include bench terraces. Terraces, walls
or other approved treatment may be required for cut and fill slopes greater than 10
feet in height.
149171.I
d. The overall shape, height and grade of any cut or fill slope will be
designed to simulate the existing natural contours and scale of the natural terrain
of the site.
e. In situations where cut or fill slopes are greater that 5 feet in height and
exceed 100 feet in length, the contours of the slope will be manipulated and
curved in an undulating fashion in order to reflect the natural terrain.
f. Rounded edges and smooth transitions will be utilized so that grading
blends into the existing topography.
g. Careful site planning will minimize the potential for erosion, flood hazards
or unsightly scars.
h. Vegetation in the bottom of the fill areas will be salvaged and reused on
re-sculptured cut embankments and along rights of way.
i. Cut slopes will be sculpted and re-vegetated to emulate naturally existing
slopes.
j. Create undulating slope banks and vary gradients to assist in the creation
of slopes with natural appearances.
k. Seeding and erosion control techniques shall be employed, such as wood
fiber hydromulch, drilled seed with straw mulch and jute matting.
1. Where possible, shielded cuts will be utilized.
m. Grading allowances and limits shall be as shown on the Tentative
Development Plan.
F. Open Space:
1. Open Space. A minimum of 10% of the total gross land area shall remain as
undisturbed open space.
G. Streets:
1. Local streets will be constructed in accordance with Exhibit G.
H. Preliminary Plat Conformance with Planned Area Development(PAD) and Tentative
Development Plan(TDP):
The Tentative Development Plan(TDP) included as part of this Planned Area
Development(PAD) amendment for Area Z is intended to enhance the site analysis data
149171.1
and provide greater detail about how the proposed single-family residential community
will be configured. It further serves to ensure that the proposed community can be
constructed in conformance with this PAD and the codes and requirements of the Town
of Oro Valley, where applicable. This PAD amendment has been prepared with
information from numerous local homebuilder(s), but with no specific homebuilder(s) in
mind. Therefore, it is acknowledged that the preliminary plat submitted for this property
may differ from the TDP with regard to items such as the following: lot size, number of
lots, local street alignment, drainage and location of grading treatments. Any proposed
changes to the TDP to accommodate the residential design criteria of a specific
homebuilder shall be submitted to the Zoning Administrator, who shall review the item
and shall ascertain whether or not the change is significant. The change shall be
considered as not significant and in conformance with the PAD and TDP under the
following circumstances:
a. The lot size and number of lots may vary from that shown on the TDP
provided that the lots conform to or exceed the minimum development standards
established by this PAD as they relate to lot size, building heights, setbacks, and
open space requirements, etc.
b. The drainage scheme shown on the TDP may vary provided it complies
with the Town of Oro Valley Floodplain Management Code and Drainage Criteria
Manual.
c. The treatment of graded slopes shown on the TDP may vary provided they
comply with the grading standards established herein.
d. The layout of local streets shown on the TDP may vary so that that
circulation still provides for logical and efficient movement of the vehicles of
community residents,police and fire departments and other emergency services.
Any changes to the circulation will be supported by a Traffic Impact Analysis.
I. Bank Stabilization:
1. Filled areas adjacent to the Canada del Oro Wash shall be bank stabilized as approved by
the Town Engineer, subject to the Pima County Flood Control District, the Federal
Emergency Management Agency(FEMA) and pursuant to the Town of Oro Valley
Floodplain Management and Drainage Criteria Manual.
J. Outdoor Lighting:
1. The provisions of Chapter of the OVZCR shall apply. Lots whose homes may be
adversely affected by outdoor lighting of adjacent or nearby commercial properties shall
incorporate appropriate mitigating site planning, building orientation, design, and
landscaping features to ameliorate these potential impacts.
149171.1
K. Noise:
1. Lots whose homes may be adversely affected by noise emanating from adjacent or
nearby commercial properties shall incorporate appropriate mitigating site planning,
building orientation, design, and landscaping features to ameliorate these potential
impacts.
L:\181057\Parcel A\PAD Amend\Rooney A PAD Amendment.DOC
149171.1
Ii
\ \ \\\ N\r7
\ 76.5-ACRL AREA \
----,
SUBJECT TO PAD \
AMENDMENT AND TO
BE NAMED AREA Z
\
7iA \
,,,,,, \ iv AREA NOT SUBJECT TO
/glk PAD AMENDMENT'
<<, xp, (c/3AgE.e)V).‘ AND TO REMAIN AREA
-s-\
\,\).'
1,
/ . &
<<,`•
4
\ \)-
CY-
/
EXHIBIT A
PAD AMENDMENT AREA
ROONEY RANCH AREA Z
( A 76.5-Acre Portion of Area A)
The \ .i r4%4
WLB LI CD
Group.n._Al, L-j1J D) 9.5.2003 .
WLB No. 181057-N-001 III
,..
. ,../
\,. •..\.\
, ..,
. ..,
../ . ,..
" z ../- variety in I iv'.,•:,": , straight
undulating slope // Aii..••.,\'' slope bank
bank creates a ..
./ heightens
pleasing roadscape *pp iti to ` ,:I.iie roan:i.ut oa td)yw:yf
, ....p,
landscape
\ , Ailisuir'•• Ailis
(-THIS r--. .. ,. 7. .... .....„ 1--N 0 Tunnatural cut
727' .'
1 • . 1 •
• • •• THIS ..• .. . '.
•......• )
e•4•r• 1 ... •' : i ,,,,, t<
1 .. •• ,... : 01111
• / • 0111.4.11 ... '* 0°1 .1
• • '•*e.*'..' 411111"10111 • •
• • *** **.* glitig
: : • .400110,- • • .•
t • I •
• • •••••.,.. •
• • ..2 • ••• **** ***‘' . "PAW
• 1• •1.
• •
i •
/
r .
•
•* / T 0 II tl 4 off cut •*..,
K. **... edges to cool Drill
standrd cut into
to the natural grade
",,... * , a
nose or ridgeline
.- ..---)
•
.. ..,
(--- ----\•„
be ' Tiimilimiri bank
.--N
/// bank ,
. •
.,''.•• , i /// ,,t 1
,... sills*
• .. , ,
,,.. ../......,. II 11101 1../..',/,::,/,/./..;,....
,,. ,./ ------.
10. .
I i „...--.-....---- . .
THIS i 'NOT THIS
rounded „„. ,
--- _
contour edge ........ • , UuuIuuIIflfiØ . bank
._„...-
------ .
variety-ln slop bank gradients , engineered slope banks
• Ilk**
creates a natural appearance ...
. . \,,..'
took forced and unnatural
Figure 13
. .
,... EXHIBIT B
GRADING TECHNIQUES
... ROONEY RANCH AREA Z
1 = 400'
( A 76.5-Acre Portion of Area A)
ie"Nk
- The
_f9. 00
5.23 Iv ,
- Group t_ DS WLB No. 181057-N-001
Inc.
MI11111111111111.111MNINIIIIIIMMEMIN116
E
..''
Seeding And Erosion Control Techniques
i..,•:
0 0 y 0
d......,....:..,-. ,-'?--\ ,-.
•,,....,,.:t...t. ...v.,. .,, --,_.--\
i 1 , S't, '1421, •
aill I 1 ila- \,, .":' • 'v..•.;,-\e'
. ..., • 't.
dloped l
Wood fiber .\\\\ - ''' , N 4.4...;•.'.,,, ,
evearea
MS i i hydromuich \))_\„4,\4,..\\, \ ,.. iw:• ,0
01111111111111111111 ......:401,
iiirin . \ mati
THIS v
, NN tr....o. % , , ,.......,.....---
ss
\,.. Undulating Transition
To Natural Area
ntural area
•-4:414,:ez.---...,,,--...%-y,..,!--.4:. ,
.... ...,....4,,,,,„ „A....4...,,,,...... . I
Figure 12
1, r
Mil
('-' -•stleferiel511 . .".,1 , .
gift.,A
' ' .tril Or
.., :_ff4in 4 L• . , / ? .• drilled
_iii.
OM
\ 1110 '` :7.•(//,'.4,/ - straw mulch
, , e
['till!
• developed area
il---- -________ V•`;,-,,Ic.-.''"''''' 1 a
i f i 1 MUMMUIPM11111M61.11111111 anainniMini f#2 .a c;:-.0'-:., ' .' c',,. ,
111111111111111 1 Ina transitIon 1111MMUO I '',, ,,,-. vi ? .,\\ , ..,-...
,.. , ... \\\„, \.:,..
' I Jute matting . .. i•N•,\,. ;.;'-_L
natural area 1 applicationi.li,;--->
,r,,,40,T THIS
_.-) 'k%.;.4....-..:-.4.....iii ,,
•-. /-
4111i - /\ Figure 22 **1
-
,.':...
I.,
I
EXHIBIT C
GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL TECHNIQUES
Mir
ROONEY RANCH AREA Z
1" = 400'
( A 76.5-Acre Portion of Area A)
Th e L\ In -----
WLB \ i )
-,
‘/' 9.5.2003
WLB No. 181057-N-001 girl"
L--ri L----' '
in
terracing makes it easier to
control erosion, drainage
and revegetation „,r, •"'•°'
.,.......:,,,
.,4„i5,,,,Vitiffle ' -..... - -.401.....
---..---_r ....,_ _. ....,..-grazfed,:di /i' iri--- ---,..... -,--
";,1---,. --„..;;01.,71,Z., ------,Z. - 1
r....-
•
, ,....
4 44 aarti 401, 1 ,/ ie
draii. 4,4
•At 4.4 40 f if
4440440: .
4,4„, a
ir Iii
Terracing .
benches revegetated, It
slopes stabilized ,e,
-5
$..
. ,
,..
4e •
Ors \ =41;11:num
.?' drainage devie
terrace section
EXHIBIT 0
GRADING AND TERRACING TECHNIQUES
ROONEY RANCH AREA Z
i" . 400'
( A 76.5-Acre Portion of Area A) rN
The
WLB s_. .i DD. 1810
WLB9.5.2003
No. 57-N-001 MO"
Group
Inc
+
° * 0 * 1 1 I -'- -\ - ,} •i'Lj
,""- '-- - '•,,, I 0 ( ------ , 0
j k i
0 (.---
..._ ___At
/,,,m,\*
, i -L...,) * a *
LL__,5
* 0 *
0
b
Typ. 10,000 sf 7 * * ,Amik 40
(iNTa
IO 41, ,
of Graded Area r".- 0
, „../
to be Revegetated. "L ,)
\ yi
'c-,- ----IT
_
Or---,,*
i,Th,
'Li
* ,v, 0 * 0 w.
' \
100'-0"
/
LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS FOR GRADED AREAS
Minimum of 12 trees per every 10,000 square feet of graded area
Minimum of 30 shrubs per every 10,000 square feet of graded area
Minimum of 35 accents per every 10,000 square feet of graded area
- Planting palette shall conform to the Arizona Department of Water Resources Low
Water Use/Drought Tolerant Plant List for the Tucson Active Management Area
• Planting scheme (spacing, density, grouping, selection, etc.) is intended to emulate
the existing natural environment.
• Top 4-6" of inert soil to be removed, stored, and reapplied after installation of landscaping.
EXHIBIT E
CONCEPTUAL PLANTING PLAN FOR GRADED AREAS
ROONEY RANCH AREA Z
400'
( A 76.5-Acre Portion of Area A)
The _1 L
\WLB \ / iWLB No18105
1 D
i 9.5.2003 yr
. Group,,c . 7-N1-001 - .
. .
4.
. , 1 . • .
' 'V
Diversion
1 '
Swale
, • •
• - . i r
• . ,
. ..\ \ .
' g •' . . ,
i.
_ • . •P
. t '
.. . . . .•t, s)\\I I til . .("` :—
n •
,•
... ‘ i-.4. 46,' ,A•
,..
. -
..,.---
.
4.
• ,
Reinforced Masonry
:,• • ,., ,,:;./:../ V .....
Retaining Wall
1 I ,, f • ,,,-
. . . \I\I 1 f/ t '''•'' ` .„,,,_,....
Landscaping
• .-e _ 7-,,,,- iry i .-K.-:_ ,, , ..,..„,.,
• -:. -.. , , ' *---
• - 1'2- '''
.41,,•
I , .
Natural Grade
I
0 "•
-co 2
New Grade
8'-0"
/• ,...,,,.., ....,„.... „,...,..,-. ----1/
EXHIBIT F
TERRACED RETAINING WALL
ROONEY RANCH AREA Z
1" = 400'
( A 76.5-Acre Portion of Area A)
The EiS ,
WLB9.5.2003
Group i __A D WLB No. 181057-N-001 11111,
,
• PLPL
46'
R.O.W
10' 4' 3' 2' 14' 14' 2' 3' 4' 10'
PUERM • PUERM
2%
3,
Aw
-H
OwITER 2' CONC.
WEDGE CURB, TYP JOINT / WALK TYP.
•
°SEWER TRENCH
• N.T.S.
EXHIBIT G
LOCAL STREET SECTION
ROONEY RANCH AREA Z
( A 76.5-Acre Portion of Area A) e."‘
The
WLB9.5.2003 lir
Groupin, D WLB No. 181057-N-001
SITE ANALYSIS
PART I -- INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS
INTRODUCTION
This site analysis and Tentative Development Plan are being prepared in support of a proposed
amendment to the Rooney Ranch Oro Valley Center PAD. Per an agreement with Bayer Vella,
Senior Planner, and due to the fact that the property has previously studied as part of the
existing Rooney Ranch Oro Valley Center PAD, this site analysis does not cover all areas
specified in Section 3-104 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised. Rather, it focuses on the
most pertinent physical issues as they relate to development of the subject property.
r The proposed amendment focuses on a portion of Area A. Currently, Area A consists of 79.5
acres and is zoned for multi-family residential, single-family residential, commercial and
recreation. This proposal is to amend the zoning on a portion of Area A and is to be referred to
hereafter as the 76.5-acre Area Z. The remaining 3-acres of Area A is to remain as Area A and
is r nt Rooneyanch Oro Valley
to retain its commercial zoning as is governed by the cure y
Center PAD. A new set of development regulations have been created for Area Z.
The intent of this proposal is to amend the Rooney Ranch Oro Valley Center PAD, and more
specifically the zoning for Area A to allow for single-family residential and recreational
development on the proposed Area Z. Market conditions over the past 14 years produced no
interest in multi-family residential and commercial uses on this property. Today, this site is
highly attractive to homebuilders for the development of an attractive and well-conceived single-
family residential community. As such, we submit to you this site analysis and Tentative
Development Plan as part of our efforts to amend the Rooney Ranch Oro Valley Center PAD on
behalf of Canada del Oro Partners.
I-A. Existing Land Uses
1. Site Location
The subject property consists of 76.5 acres located within the Town of Oro Valley in
Section 7, Township 12 South, Range 14 East, Pima County, Arizona. The site is
bounded by First Avenue to the west, property owned by Pima County Flood Control
District to the east, and the Canada del Oro Wash to the south. The northern property
line abuts the southern edge of property owned by Capri Company, LLC (the Kai family).
Refer to Exhibit A for a location map of the subject property, and to Exhibit B for an
aerial photograph of the subject property.
2. Existing Land Uses - Onsite
The subject property is currently undeveloped and vacant.
As previously mentioned, the subject property is currently zoned as part of the Rooney
Ranch Oro Valley Center PAD. The Town of Oro Valley General Plan Update 2020
designates the property as Master Planned Community. The Town of Oro Valley Town
Council approved the General Plan in March 2003; however, in a general election held
on November 4, 2003 the general public failed to ratify the General Plan.
Site Analysis and Tentative Development Plan � p ,.
Y ..
110
Rooney Ranch Area Z
WLB No. 181057-N-001
September 5, 2003
diNINNIMII
I ,
•',1,7,,..,X,V'....T;f ep. :Z,...:7:..OW..*7 AZ''-'7'---,,,"!%7.7-j*f•374,7".!..47*,,T--4411 --"r2. -•ir471;.1,-'
i .aar ,._......,,,..„,.,:,.,,,,,--.1.4.-_-ri:,5-..":7„-..i7;.?,--..-7?-;,-...f.,,.7;....•,43i,;-; ...*,..4,..,._*- .1;:,,,, ,fr..-,,,,....--pro,lire- ...."--,il,:...,••e..•-;4--' ••••---"'''• •• • **•44 '''''" '.. .
! T...7, ' ..--.0---.,••:-7..t.,•-;.4",,•,....t...:A.-e-,,,,„ii,i-Aiirre......,. .trik, 7,.--1......; r,,,, . ,„ • 7,... :- %,-,4..,-;".."-..-:--.....r,.., 1 . .41..ii.4... . •.
i ,-,ri• .--:,':`,,-`"..A.44.e.;-....:.!....1:c..A:',.:,„,...4:,ie.....?4,-;..*'-:,,,*.„044A1'4,;(-4.•,.-,.,*., . • .'.•.."..,,,,,f4,07,',..--,...". •..4*,.17.;;_.,.;.4,-,ei's,.7,;-,,,F•4.;I,.jr.12..;446.• ., ..,,e,2,.;; 11;,& •
I . ."''' ' *-0",-.41"4.:7-'."4.e•-r.'''.7"."'-'4V.,..,44k,.....z,.../0.......A-ir,a1:-....r, .7.t J.?.4 ,,, • • 'a•i.r, ... .•1;4...--:e-.,-.t.-.7")"At,',-;-.1,.•t•-•,-• - *. - ;• --i,•••••••.!„.4._.--•-t•
'- Es'''.';:.?...44.,,,,_•:-.7.-4.-t-::i1;: s..,...''taz.,-.F..,e;•..-:•.,"4•:,-*Y,),,,--- ---,-,-' '..',Akifv". -:,1.,-' -- •.,,T-0**74-- :7-1,-...p.z.r4e,fr-iii-.4,.-7.--'-'*• - '-',3*--.4;qt., 4!'""..ilk,
*
' '..:•--4.-.1,''./""i'''''.::;',.1,...4: 1" 4.., 4Li.'"r4rt:;.7.4",i1,;;;,::;').!:1.. .-:...- --teri'''-1,,-.:4 -74..-'1..,,..... .,_,-,,....-;•;. ....;,..ir..-;.-_. ;;-*.t ..6,;:-..r.--k-'.= ,-.t-do.:t. 5-4e, .- ,
.,... . .
t i,.;:.-,:,.,..--41k-kt-e-*at.:•.:.-AID.r..?„-ap...s.11.....24e.7,--_ ,,,,,,: *-.K.7.:,44----%_,,-_-:._- • ,.6,.,„:-. -..-ew.. :-..„.t.. . :_#,-,-,;ar, ,ss,,,ft.,.„IR.,,,z,iiik.s. . ..; • . -, _ •..,, ,
---iwt,,9''. t'•7. - .•'-'4-Ar-44,••:,f...",•••=w.4,0:7- • -..4 .-:- -',I '•rit,Tre -,._'e'.,-,,•,..t.ii-:- E ,.. -4.6--,!t-41.c... r•.-i-.--..;,,.....,•.k..,,..7:-,'--E• •,".';',..446' 0 ,4 .',,,,i
. ..elitoti:::....*"..14..:....;:jet,w,i4..,,,iitts.;:',..17.,;_,.„7-'77,:lry,If.'.dja.„,„1.2,,,r4rAt.:-.,f;t4t,;.lie0.•,,,:kl: ., ''''' ''''.•r-'' i . •':. .:1:1,, '''I"t'4C'-',It"4''''.',.1.',,,4.%rWaPs1,-;.!.r Ir.-!-'S,;;-...t'IX i.. . '•',r
• -.'twit:'••,7. - . .1::e.a.-;.,.fic,..1."-I;NT-4.• , 74,-,,,,.••*-;:,.. ,-. ... , • . 1
'. Ao-.... ii::..-;7•412f-_,,';;:joviatZvocri.9P-2-:t47,e4.4, -..----„,-,7'1''7-',..,41t.,...",r„.-_ ,,.. -...,,... ---. ..,-.;,.4" •, .,,,-.. - •__... -.: ., -r-. • ,,4 •.4-•,-,' i, . .•
t
.._ --%'•f-„7:..,p. '.;•"?.,..jr/.:''' 1%-....+ ... AP;1%-27,- -'' :. c:• - Ar,-,t--..,,-M,A,•:-', ' "r*ct're!,. `-- .- ; -:-."'''..- ""--4 le'''- 4. •i'•-•r ., .:.`:;',-' • •,__''•
.- r Is:, . .......1.1.: .41.7.,,,:: *„,,,„,:iry.j.4‘,/,...,::..... „....„ 7...7.-:-. ... -.Or..44, -,............,....., r:._ieptlic.474: ,,,,..,1.',.......,; . ..„:„..,-: .,,, ,,.„,.,.. . ..,..,„..t. ... _ii:.......,-,••.. . ;"404. ,,,,, J.,-..,
..,...-;MA:.,;;: ' 8,F...A;,..'..-,-;.*-' ...T.',..T.:,-.-":..1 :•;_i,''414..;%..':!•:.,S;:•:...1;17..:.. it:,4-:til'..;ii 7.'-fc'-*.•kalr,-'•7:-•-. .'--- jecl,
_sr
t..,....„..v2:1_;::i.k...v.i.,,,,,,rNitir:...:•s.
„▪ 7,--,- ,t,,,,,i,. ..,,At.vt, ..,.. 01_. ,,._- 7, "A,;,::-•;e*, -4-:::-..;-/ p ,:::),- --..t„'..4,•,.,..?!. . 2.4*,,,.t. -4. ,i.'"....••.,:,
.•,:. .1e:.;..Y;-1.1,1•1f3,a-•...-*rite‘ei!,)-i,-.3: ' 14-4*.'--',-. '-''ltz-,;,--- ti.....c.,1"-.-c:,:z-:'Z' '-e.,--%, i-,.•,.'-1,,4'1',=•--Ir-i.-i&.t*"tstric: -' 17:••;;:v ''.-Nk.',.' ..".•'. •', ••••‘-t:.--.4.••••9'•
1 't.,;,,,,"_.;;•,44.E.I'Lt,411r_____,:;-:,---'W..:.-....-i-.':,--••• ,I.c.,.-my•-.L.vi•iiti4P- .'t,•,* iAt_ 4 T'7,Ake-,- ,,l'•.,"*.i.•,..714,-Irc,,,.....: •:*;*4::;4r.•••'-'.4* --.1...'"-.`-j',..'7, i4:•44,,,, :- ir 1.•••i'...- 1.t.
I.
i'• f A - -1-'k-•,-471.4:•, .VW:"%.•:,=-:*eti'!":;-td-b;...-,-- .P -, Cf-Trotellit.lv•-•. '''':,,P-7 sevA-7?._,"".14.‘A- W'-'itIr•st.-i'''s'•"--.(4it., _.•:b7-A-''-,f- --:,...-i i- ---t•--441,.....„...'•44,.''-,-,`,4.1,;•'•;
I.' : . ."si!,•::-101-.--... ,-..-Jitt,,44.--.-1,4-€;-`4,S•4-67.- ..*.,*-•!.".::.-"4,34.,_,.,-,e:',-.::-4, -.7„,',--- .„..1„ it tt•-•',,',7..-4.--..,,-...;-,0/4 4-7=,,477. ' :-.,--:71..:-•,.-r.,„.!...-.'''-'4,--:.e4e....,'si",,,qA._4,
i , (:.2••,•. 2,,,. Iv.-..-;:,..frveity; .-4,17,,:....-w.,,...: wt,,,i, ..,••-. --io.,,, ,V f,.-F-,,-±:,_ - , ;it.... ,.:;.--t* -„.• :`,4, .•.IP -:.'.i-,!...-:,.,i•-,..,'",„•-'.:,.,..---.,,,' ; "•• -47r1r-,;•••4-.;,-,•••• ... •=ioi'.1.*4.7''Z:''
i. -V.'''. =---,4- ,.4eir-,; -'::,t-7.4*-",„'fi,,Y,A.t.a1:7;- :.g.,;;* Z I:2'f'To,:u.,,Vi•.n.'....: pirifri-",?_1?...e.-4,1,'-'.'zi:l'4-4.14',k-**''•',•-•,1-4i.,:4-404114::':1,-'''•*!'-.V.-s',,,,,'". ..-' .S,,' .....;::,-'•Vii
1 f i-t:'-•.-* -4e,-,-.1.4.4*, 4.:.,i..,,,,c4Aiii.,:r...1:.;.:41,17-1t.:z...,. ,,,:,,.. ., ,..,,_.,......„?-..fr,44....:.-....-„,-..k .4-.4,-,:::-....1„-,-4,..r.,:.:_,;...-:-ir‘, ?S.:-Z."'..,- -,Y%'le'."-C''.•‘...4,:' 1
y ' :1.....„-,, .kt ' ,.., il,,47,,,i...,-.(6- -.,..?z. .- 4,-.......:_;*--;-',.-T-..i,..,,,,%.-A, ..•,:t....;-/..,....4*;',--ut - ,i1:-..-1,1;;;...,.-•;,,e.,.:4-:-_,,..*-1,-- ,,. ,„4.1e..,. ..........;..s,.:1,,,7;:,I.,
1 . 7.....„.,...,...,..4.,...,...,,,,.,4...4„.;4,7tv-,t..k„.„::,..ti,„-.. .,........:„,...z.,.. .......iiii,.;...4.4.,...1„,„,,,..e,o,,. ... ..,.„.t,.....,...,.....;,;i, . .;:,.;;11,..t.,i:,. ,4.1„...-., ....;......:,„vz,.... ....,..,,x..„ ...
4• 'I:•.''..1;•'-',....:: • '-',•_..."•-i,414'X'.,:-.K.:%'-',Ii?- !).•i•li;4:•-*--s' .•e:A.,1-,- )-- ‘,/...irter":4'11.i.e..-;•:". ',,,t.';',...'''''-';') ••::ar4-4`'4,--Ii •:"*"ig % *,(V.!•- -"•-•.,:.":`,..;',..,!..-, ,"4 41,.._...., 4'
t've,'":•ler.7'''-f4:'''''.';''' 'AeZ`',r017:7Z1"..?-t-':.4...-1X-4 ::;,45,..i'?:*•‘••,.;-'...."-*-1..5i:".‘4"..ii;-7i-a:1:-!;,‘Niet- -'•`;.4-.:,'•it;:7.',.';:.'A 17 :. Irv'tic.:' .4.i,—,'•'-...;11;:/.ir.',.i'
. .-* 7c-
3 i
'-'. 14,-..P...:•,.-..:•?,...1.51,..-:.;..-;.4;• ',f,:::,,fi...t:),..,,,,_ :,:i.•:._54-,,,.....,i,-;),. ..4-i.-..4:4c.t.,,,.-4.,%-„,-.§- -,.-,-..!..i.,.:-1.'....:,..7:i'RT.,e2.-1,-. ..-----,.'''cr.,,,..'..,,r,Cii.:._,-e-i,:,4.4r...7:'4,.'....-;i:jii;I::...#.;-'41,;s"..glitig41:'-. 4,70
''' •'-' 1:---L.iVe-,.'i'.,..476•'!'4-1.--Kit'-'7,(,47'32.1!"‘:-.1e:tgAkgr„..,-.::".44t1/414.1-..,_it.:74,„.__.-,,,,,z,..41.,::„,,...,..7t:::i.: ,.,7,-,:>„,_";::t.,..,,,,f,... ...I,,...rt. tc:::,:.3;,i.,:,,-,-,,....,:.,4al&... ,..,..1,4,..:
k
i ,_ .:s....: _ir..,:vv,../...„.,.t•,,,...,_,,6".3.41"1,• ,,,,,..4,7•4 ...• .:ANJ.4•...,:,',.-ft - -',,W.Y-4,-......--,-,-,..-cre:,,T.,...,.4.1*,1„1,zk'a•e,,ti-;.V.,.at';;:•''-V IT. ,;'Z' t•al.,,,,5,,,,_ >,•••44.•••••,,f1.4„,,„-43"-", iii,--• •„:.,- •
;*-,. '•,*• ::-., ,, .,,-.;*.:i c&f.;;•:,,,,,i f.,-::,,,,n,...... •,..--•;,'•:. :..•,,s.;....,-..-•eu.. ..,..,"-p-t4,-,....,,,,,,-.•.-e.:.z........;,-zil.....x!,,,:f.. di.z,-e.,..., * ..., ;,-,'-.4*,---1,.:,,,e-c - *••--, -c- . • •. ,.., -..
!°*; :. tr..,t4Ari4s-,......;-,k3-tir.t:-.;,;;,.1.:::::1„,-..-rt.,, -..Z.`,,,.ii,,,-.,..:`,..,,,,:,4•,.."...,,„&.i4;:',,,,A-",:lik lt.,?;i1:::.:::,:411,s4z, .,..74fr 4r-,..,,-E,..-.:-4..t.:V.':J.,,.,;_-..,•:;,•.4t..o...4.,..;,:......•-....,..,_ ,.....".. ,.• •
',. • :,k, ••,•,t,i i,., --- -, t.•,-•''etl.,-•i" .4.,. 4.4.43.;A p p A zr"3„,. a.:T......::.,4„..?.,;.i....:::_k.r,...:,,t,,,,,,.:7 .47:-,.,,,,z.i,:- -44,t-:-.4...;,:r
1 11:
.....\,4.,....,...,..,,..........f„...„.,01...„7.... ....,_, . , ..,,„..,,..........t.....„.. ..,:„. ., it.....i... , fl1,.,:i..._.„-,_.. ,,e..„4..., -:,....,. ...,..„..,„....„.,,.....;,...1,;,it,..:„..,,.
.,1..r.: :••,: •;,., I\.,„1....- .....--- -dpi.. .;'" - 41,-"ik- -.,•fitt ;, ,,-,.:ty,',.6:Wttl .117,.- •
t -, ' •,,,,,-.*:-:::,,•L't 4,:.'•*--ity-.,:.....#.-?:,514.--...3 .•i••••-•:..4...•..‘.,,..',...,-*4":175.-,ii; ;-•:•*V.7;:72,a7..!4,-esY.K,1-,••";;'• ..44-::4‹.;.fvf...%--40y:-.2 ,-.-4.-J.k"=•4,'Si..v.ir 1401,774;t-,*34,-_,.. -.,41r.,S,' . : :r, •'
41:,,,_,---,......tirc.....01.z.--..71,-0,-.4,...?"-ii4F-0-;-;14,._
..i.:!'- • ,..-'74-•‘44.4 '-40;. e-.- ;t:ast-4, 4--;,_ ,:: ...!,,, ,f-,4441,,,4; -.••••,.1',-"ltr)r::4*.,,ezf?•.:,..-r---.010,0,,---7::--.,:;,-.7-„,,...,;,z4 4,-17:-t-,IN....,.-..!;-..,.1,.;.n v.::.,--,.;.,.;,:-., ..
'4'. At-,...-.:-.--le--;:ge: ' ,,",'A;•-v't, AI,.' '1'. L•tit,......-Y4';;;-;.,-;- -, ,7.1o,f17.,,'-,..:-.'•,-• ...-4„....2*/,,4,_,...,,,._...t.›,..c. " .„,,,, ?.•,,,,--,-;: .•,.. • r , ...---mr,•;41-1
'.•-. - -i, .,- - , ...t.•-•.,-34.4-. ..-„,.4. .•',"- ..,1,,X.,.._.:-•...rcif-'4•• t-. ,1 .--'4,if:' ‹ PO,,," ;1..;,‘,kis0-1...:_,Vk,-.'---4.1..,•••., -t•t,1).- •,:1-'•••;4.'.•." -.0•••'',, -....4-.4,
i..4,6 ilt . --.- - -.'...:=.k. -- ••••et 4•IP,X''•'-:Ar.:-ti:11-0;:i;• ••''';i4 .•t 41-.'"•.74.."-.'0V. .' ` ..,;".144.4.-11t,'''It. .'•-.1,‘ <- - -•i'. ••••;.‘.44'4**
't: ',.,,,' ,' .4.-- .. •::„ 4.-'.- -t;•.• 4, .',i,,,,4,:,,,,,,%,;(-1;-,..-, q,!•,lii.-iic ..,.4$44,-,.4W1,---*.•,4%,,,,,,;,'A-4.,\.•'•.......--...0,--! - ti,
%'.; '-.-1 •.i- -'• ,._ - '-_-'4*---.i(i.l.....,',•,-.k.; ,.'W'iv ,,,--'7'cf'N.,:t..+4.--..-",,-t. ii... . ....-,IN,--z-0-4,:c.,,,,,,,,.,..,....F.;,-,..44-4...,,tr.02-..,,A . ..,••. -.,_,- - ,- -- --.,i'- •
-4-,r.-2:.70,-,-':,...,... ,-.3,--•t,1.!..,.ie...i._.,,..,--- I.,0,,..,..,.4.v.! '40.•..
,. P,f.'? .'.-.1k7, - •.i..,-.;-'7".41;-•'=Int.''.0.-lesi'kOtt.-e•-•t.. t", r..4*N20-‘'.#k.,..'-1,14e..**,14,...i.s.,7'4..."Strt,.4k5;-Y.;:/t.'''44*t•-'..geltsnr.44‘-' .4tr* *-'t. pep !..''4"'''
1- f-\* . .sr.--,- -. ,. , tc- .4-9,,,,;---4.-.-:---- '...,'L.-, :,,,,I.,..--5,•••,-,..3.-•$,4,-,;:iv.'',,• 00.4., 4-V":-•••,;..-...4,,,,,,t,,..itt,'..•,lAirt-t '`‘,,,leirt•.-., '-,,` •:'•• ''' .-,,,,f,Sy'
•` 4-''Ar• .-i - '.. •iS•%";4*, i,4.'1...t...,,•Ir•I'.'•t.,•?...bN.--,:ort.--,,•YS;:,.:f.,_': ., ,,,,, .„„'.•-•,r1t,,,•,:itoigs'•:,25,...44;:o rr '--,.., - •;.-(•,1,,A.I,-••••• ; ,.,-.1, • •"5"‘3..e.•* 0
*",...,13,A-I. •.. .-44::--•,;1.'•• 'ir'in- ''''-','„;',..744-47kt7t7;1';'-'-::*.•F:c1.1-1,'-In‘"..,-z1X141'.....irt.' -Z:4.1•Sli4.4,4-31-fTrid, -k:;r...r.-;,::illi ...27'-'1,..•,..."'41"-.:1''''.4.';'. .-Ata%:41-.•14•4•••..''....—(:-.--40...:: :-,.,..f,''." ' of*. -.....,-,'• ,-.'c.,,,z1. -,..17.4W... "1„;
.1`4,--.5„;•. -'..i. .".. " `4 ,"- -tat.'..".:-MIE-,,i"'ci; ''S. -,..._-..A .' --*••=- -*TO!••-i ,41,1%,--• •":,..a-•.---., ' • 4c.. *'"- ".-- -',
,:.-,..,*V"I,.._. " i•:• -
11111 . ..,, ,.-.. . .-......g. .,,,,,, -- ,,, -,g. ;tit_:.,,,,-....46,,i„.t •-..-vg:,,,....,.5i,...,,,-;.,..,,..A :,,,,,-ithr-._.g, .4,..,y,• ,,,,,, -.,,,,.„,,,..,,,_,-‘,.;,, ,...4, .,..,:,-_ 0, . ,r , ,.
V'.‘,' :t-..4--• ' -4,'-4:;;%. -=',4-- ,,-A --'41,•zi%ii•'-v•t,ks,*:":7:-Ti.:i.i-',e ."`-'4*-.44--.:14,,,.:7 e'r*iiki› -Jtv,fri- ' ::,4":" .."7:,!':'...io,.1-7-. ,- -4;-
T. 13•-•.:---' ---:'.4*--ai's,-*"° "i`--:',=..7-!-,..1.-4165: *•--..1.:- _Y.,t•It....4fi,'41,4- ''*-4*••:!iii,`••,...-_7:tr.4:-.4-fx,-..4'.-F. .---':.;'.,„,iss. -.'.,!i,...„-- ,-..e•',,,I. .)-„,41140,0,_ • 7•..,,,-. :'..• :41
#
,-.1Ab .,. -...--,,_„,..4,, r :., • „...,...i,-:-..-- ,,,...414..:".-z,-c._414,
,.:,--,..:,*.---,N..- - -,..--tA.:,..4.- v..4t.'47.1q--,--- -'7--,t -4--'1*-:—."- ..slit,:-.4;.".. ''` ‘-‘.4.6((,\',''-'t .44.i'•Ni. -"-'4 ':.;
it-7\ --4- r- , ..- .'t-i--:.-----.•,•,;,-. - •, - It-,-,, "..•:,' .-. •j, • ..I.-.•'• -'-1 - .-'.'410-
,:i-•-,Z-.. ''.^-'.11. e,..'•• i;!,-..1-.f.,..4,--*:.*.r.MI*:- . .•.1.11,4144.4,'"%1 y, • `.- ,, . ' , ..^,a• . \,..e. ."..,• ,..,..,7'.2,..a,A- . 116.C;_,;,W, ,s4.:,-,e,,. . -...., . ,,.i,,i..f,,.:
‘4":et V;k4.4•:!.'iii. :0..7.;:..,T1:.*:1*.2%;r.. -.:_,,,.......02:77%;1''''ia.i'.74.CnttO; :R.::;. -•A.S..*ir f..r::-!7‘ ' .)''r-,t4C?' ittle;44t;:ittili- -_-. 4.,;_,;,./i,t,,e,
„log,
. ivi,„\;.,.,7'4;--44?-.,,,O.;.4:=-:'..--tni.4,-.4,:-Nt.':".4"2:,:i;'-' ..STOA*8-,:'.IVflit:''*-.-' '.i.1- iTc._.-•--..,...'2,.,..-..-,,..,--- .L‘>-,-....-...ie.-v,-.---)1.--irliiittk.4.1,--,
-4., -., iteliii.4••5,4.4---,.--Ili:*vX,4,-'-• *'%.,4....'2'..r;•.'• •-•:::-.r.,•: ,A .-,..,.. -4ft;it, "'1,;-..,- -.:'--,--:;:,•:•-.7.,,' ,"b,\---i.-' .. '4-,-ft:-I. •.-'•..-4,,...gs.':•i,..tia-, •_..•
': \-_:..rt.,--,,;.,, ..„,?,,,,-;.....,-re:,,,....,..„7,;..:,-„... . .-,•,........,,,,,---,:40.....•....,.. .,-;,..f-,--„,...--;e4:-..).7._*"...;.74i ......:....;.4..-;•. - 4_:-,.,.•- .,..„,•-•;:.:-.7'........•_...7...i...- ttro*--;.!-4- • 4.-'VA;..4...._.it..;1*--x•-.•
it.
: '4.•...'.. \,.•~-4,:.::,,,;-.--44411.:4.•;:„.D.t..,,,,._"t'....---:.':-..z:-; ..-.• -,..43.e-ek-,1!:::-..."4.1-a.,-**'-T.._- -- :-,-:,-..:-.- ,,,,iv.-,.;...-,,...ff.4---,-,-. - . . _,_,-:-.-`t.l.r ..* ,ettc. ' .' . ,....:-gy!:•;.',....k.1
‘.•:•;.. c.••••\--_,_,...k.4.-74:2;,„,ke3VAlii--*i.: :':.•' ,k,..L15..‹,,,,P..,-i•;.,:t.‘:-.::".;7:-,,. ''1 7•1 ,,t -k`T.-,.- , ?.- i:....-,-,,,4 fc,t -;- ..,- , tlf.„-:;...;It!,-,'-,,.4..i, s.fr._,::ii.,:: :, .,,,,,'
k.„.....,.,\!.-..„...=,-aft....,,,,,,-.A.:...7,-...;:.,...-c• -,,,,,.41..,,,,,t.'.,,5,-,....',,..:t:It.k....:,,,,,,14.: t'"........: .._,,r_....:.-- ...:,!0_,--,.:-,:PROPERTY •,....„,‘,43,_,..__-_,.:;:,,,-:i,r_iti:...:-..:.30;"( ..„
.i.'''', '''' 'Ir-41,iii:S.::,-A--,'.:-.4 .:,-A., '''',. '?-..'t",V.1"..47 -4,--• -,....,7.--.--;... ic. i,,,,,..,,,, „..,A
py:-ii.k_.t%,••• it.:4e r-.is.,.'" ,4e.,,,
4.,,,iz.p., ;,,,,A;,...,„ . ...s.......7,a,i....!:..,.. .. ...A,,... ,,,45,,,sAli,• ..,,,,,_.. 7,,,..,.1 r••,,,..12,.../....y N Lir\...)--,... „.„:„.1-_,..,••••,...-,- r••_...,- -#....•-‘,..
VP't. 1:- -' "ill'-i'-kt-lled.""I'CZA.•.4.t k-:- --,...i4.-..;-_,i,„..4!,,-.:.-.,-,,, ,.., 2-.---..4..- ,,, _. -....p.,... „,.: ,-.:*,,,,,),-:. ....:,- ,. :::--
,-.- - -N_Ni4:,-.„ ,-,-. 1:01_,A.‘, ., ,• .. -,,,,,,T.. „-:.,,e. . ,,,,.,..i. ''7. - ti...:,:-f*A4* .-." ,„'-',4-;•+-..6;/.-,:i is' '.,••••;":- - :..-
, -.:v••••: .tgria.).";,-•4;!'tCni.47,i -. ...‘ .1r7.1i,'t" T.,'- '''' --.'-','•;'Ir '-',,'"''r°"-': _.,.._....,,,..1-•.• -. ..,„ •,..-., -,....:-.::.„•,,, ...,...,,• ,.t,•
,. .,--.. ,!•••;%,,,,,t,,,.er-7 T .j ,,.. •••.;,‘,4"'.-, ••• -' - '' ' '-' 'la-.4.04 , •.•,,, ,--•,...._ ,-.-.,
;4':_,....... ......tt,...,..‘:.;...t. t.'47:....t....414•••••- •:"?•,r.„. z.:1•,•:,..,..,:_f......:',.:<:.:.7 0-'1.1•.:!--: ,„:•t:s.,011.7.„,. .:„.-.„_ ,, "..,,,'.....s.,--•_-7, / .-,-*
• • -•''•• •r...--?a...• . •tiii.- i- . .., • --.-.,... - .-f.„7, •iP -, k .',.•••,"••1‘-s .Z
,41` %,„_.$:,01,1";:s.`•:t.„.4.4V61-C:1 -•\',Z4 ' • •,*• ,2 , •-..--.
,*:Aeit. .;ilii.,3f4-'7-1-s-.‘' , ......- ...,7; :•,-e::•,)- .',...,,:•:. ..,...--1.'1,1.........' ',;*ti..Y„„...,,t•
fall • i \• . . .. • ,"Ir• _....SI-.7• `,..,, ',:41it,,- i, -i : ..'
•., Zit t cr. •f -;-.:• •--,,4-L'.r•-,- * r — i z." .—, .-.` • .
..4\_,, v..,.,•• •, ,, ..e. 4,,, ,-,•,.,i'
k,...,-.:f. ..tritZ;. ,.-4!"Ar....";.'2, -.•.. ..-_,- :-.,"i.,.... ,...:-'•-.•."-'••.'' •Ii-;3..:,‘:. -
-: ->• - •' . ,7--- --;„,,,.t:•- - ,-„... (I-, -4 ';•° ...,;.-*-',.. 4-•••"
'tP*. v ;‘,- -'4' -;',-,-/:%'•-•th>,, je.4-('-'114'.'' :---- r -..•----'''''1' --"..'•-.. '''',.'. 't.:-.---.'
. Nti.'., -;.4.-is,,,,,...,-.'•,11.!,,,,4,-;,., -iit..-• - ';'" .."--2' ' .'•:t,:,-' ,
\•<- • ‘' "•• \
•, .,i..4i"..."7,(T, • - :-,f'---;''--.;f.„.,,,-..-_-;''' .:.00,4?.'
-,-., ‘ `.. 4,...,.......
'V.:is 'tIo.,,'"r tr,Z*4.- •••'-_,,,,' -,--, .: ...14g 4'.
‘• ... ,1/4. --41%.,.,t,....4, 4,,•,-,..-- .-.-;.---., ' -,-.•
- , '-,t:-,,t'i..,,. i▪ ,_ , ' • ,Ft*:;--;„4,.,-- -• .
, ,.,--•• •.*4`', ..„----44C:- ..' • •
' . , . „,, .,•-:. ..., - -
, .v.-- •
N., \iiit .,;.,.:•::::,....,
t ' \ s••=---,:r',..,_t.'.*-‘.''
• r .
.4.
EXHIBIT B
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
ROONEY RANCH AREA Z
( A 76,5-Acre Portion of Area A) iN
The ----
D9.5.2003
PHOTO DATE: APRIL 2003
WLB ,
Group
.
L__ii... D WLB No. 181057--N-0011
Inc_
-----i
„,...--.
3
3. Existing Adjacent Land Uses
The subject property is surrounded by the following existing zonings and land
uses:
a/b. North — R1-144 (vacant); R-6 (vacant)
East-- R1-144 (vacant)
South — Rooney Ranch Oro Valley Center PAD (Canada del Oro Wash)
West-- R1-144 (low density residential subdivisions); Rooney Ranch
Oro Valley Center PAD, Areas E and F, zoned for commercial
and professional offices (vacant)
The Town of Oro Valley General Plan Update 2020 designates the property to
the north as Master Planned Community, to the east as Master Planned
Community and Significant Resource Areas, to the south as Open Space and
Neighborhood Commercial/Office, and to the west as Rural Low Density
Residential.
c. There are both one story and two story structures within one-quarter mile
of the subject property.
d/e. There are no pending or conditionally approved rezonings within one-
quarter mile of the subject property.
f. There are no approved subdivision and/or development plans within one-
, quarter mile of the subject property.
g. Refer to Exhibit C for a description of architectural styles within one-
quarter mile of the subject property.
4. Well Sites
There is one well site located within 100 feet of the subject property. It is a Town
of Oro Valley test well and is located in the Canada del Oro Wash, approximately
80 feet southeast of the subject property.
I-B. Topography
'I. Topographic Characteristics
The topography of the subject property is characterized by hills and ridges that
run roughly parallel to First Avenue. Generally speaking, the subject property
slopes from north to south towards the Canada del Oro Wash. The southwestern
corner is the low point of the site at an approximate elevation of 2,575 feet, while
the northwestern portion of the site contains the high point of the site at an
approximate elevation of 2,660 feet. Approximately 22 percent of the subject
property is characterized by slopes of 25 percent and greater. There are no rock
outcrops on the property.
Site Analysis and Tentative Development Plan 4 T
Rooney Ranch Area Zp
TillaB
WLB No. 181057-M-001
September 5, 2003
2. Average Cross Slope
Thepre-development average cross-slope for the subject property is 13.95
percent. This figure was derived using the formula as forth by the Hillside
Development Zone, Section 10-110 of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised.
Average cross slope was calculated as follows:
(l)(L)(0.0023) = (1')(463,989')(0.0023) = 13.95 %
A 76.5 ac.
Site Analysis and Tentative Development Plan 5
Rooney Ranch Area ZMp
WLB
WLB No. 181057-M-001
September 5, 2003
I
I \
\ ' i
wi ',
i EPP Mk
}
IIPI
i 114-mile radius \\
:I ,, \ .
�
� l
, ?--- Atli 1
VACANT •
/
TANGERINE MEADOWS -1
Single-family,single-story,
mixed architecture: PALISAD S PINT
,anta Fe or stucco with the roof VACANT
Single-family,single-story,
6 VACANT
stucco with flat roof
- iNARANJA RD.
27
VACANT
to
/". \ i I ,,
- I Z,,r_ '` , SUBJECT
.... \( \J\ ) 1 1 PROPERTY
1
C DSA DEL ORO /
, \ / ESTATES
... A
Single-family,single-story,
v mixed architecture: `\.\ Ml`CED
Santa Fe+ stucco with tile r of
9! i \ Steampump Ranch,
NM Residential(brick/siding)and
tea. equestrian facilities
Gv,
oir
(metal/wood).
\\z/ ,
P ,i-. ..>\
v y \Ap \ ......____ \
ON //',17 \ ,/\ \ 'c)• ,/\
RIVE S \., �"
�■r \ �' VACANT ›,\:" I�;�` \\
,Single-family,single-story,/ 1�
stuc o.wit tie oof, , ~y
\ \� COIviIvIERCIAL
•
•/�10 Albertson s/Home Depot, f—N
/ / /•
Single-story,stucco,flat roof,
,.r RIVE'S GE *\ �,'a`- building height approx.30'
ingle-family,single-story, O` \ /
'I 0_,.. .,,,s cco with the roof -p1 • 1► IF /o
Silt,' 700. N.,,.....
COMMERCIAL
'� \ Aar
Fry's/Target,
**•*0 Single-story,stucco,flat roof, \
1 building height approx.39' \ /
\\N \) m
t
4.
4' 111 °
'K / /"-'-------- 10
— 04 • 9
U_
EXHiBiT C 4
.4
73
Arc hitectura
EStyles within 1 4
Mile of
Site aQ
M
ROONEY RANCH AREA Z
1" = 600'
A 76.5-Acre Portion of Area A)
The L P-N &i.-)
WLB
a 9.5.2003Mir !I",
Group.. --- t D WLB No. 181057-N-001
r
J
6
-C. Hydrology
1. Offsite Watersheds
Exhibit P shows the offsite, upstream watersheds impacting the subject
property. As will be demonstrated in the application for a Conditional
Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR), the development of this property will
not adversely affect the downstream watersheds.
Offsite drainage impacts the subject property at three locations along the
northern property line. All three are currently in their pre-developed
conditions immediately upstream of the subject property. The drainage
entering the subject property is shallow sheet flow at the three defined
locations (please refer to the Tentative Development Plan for the location
of the three points). This sheet flow is bound by hills that rise from 20 to
50 feet above the floodplain on either side of the flow.
2. Offsite Natural or Man-Made Features
The flows, from both on-site and off-site, exit the subject property either
via an RCP under First Avenue or directly into the Canada del Oro Wash
over the banks. Each pipe under First Avenue has a headwall with
mitered inlets. Approximately 380 lineal feet of soil cement bank
protection extends from the bridge on First Avenue to the hill to the
immediate north of the bridge.
3. 100-Year Discharges Greater Than 100 cfs
The areas with 100-year discharges greater than 100 cfs are shown on
the Tentative Development Plan.
4. Onsite Hydrology
The onsite drainage generally is conveyed in a southerly direction as
shallow sheet flow to the receiving waters of the Canada del Oro Wash
and drains at a slope of 1.0 to 5.0 percent. The contours of the land are
generally parallel with minimal channelization of the flow. The onsite flow
is characterized by braids that are discontinuous and alternate between
defined braids and sheet flow. There are no onsite drainage facilities.
Portions of the subject property are located within Special Flood Hazard
Areas (SFHA) as identified by the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA). The floodplain limits for the Canada del Oro Wash
extend into the site near the southern property line (please refer to
Tentative Development Plan for the location of flood limits). In the vicinity
of the southern property line of the subject property line a floodway line
has been established allowing the use of bank protection and
encroachment to remove the subject property from the FEMA floodplain
Site Analysis and Tentative Development Plan 7
RooneyRanch Area Z fi
letp
ATLE
WLB No. 181057-M-001
September 5, 2003
via thep rocessing of a CLOMR/LOMB. The CLOMR will be processed in
accordance with the Town of Oro Valley Department of Public Works
Operating Procedures and Directive No. 28. Base flood elevations have
p g
been established by FEMA along the Canada del Oro Wash.
5. Downstream Drainage Conditions
The Canada del Oro Wash downstream of the subject property has been
channelized with soil cement bank protection to allow for development to
occur along its banks. Also downstream of the subject property is the
bridge that carries First Avenue over the Canada del Oro Wash.
l-D. Soils
Soils testing was conducted for the entire Rooney Ranch Oro Valley Center PAD. There
are two soil groups within the subject property, which are discussed below.
1, Arizo Riverwash Complex #34:
This soil
complex (0 to 3 percent slopes) is on nearly level flood plains and channel
p
bottoms. It occurs in a large swath in the alignment of the Canada del Oro Wash (CDO).
Accordingto the U.S. Geological Survey maps and soil texts, this complex is comprised
° (20%) in riverwash. Another 10% is
largely (50/°) of Arizo fine sandy loam and secondly
Tanque sandy loam with the balance in various mixes of Arizo soils. Along the
undisturbed north edge of the CDO are small areas of vertical scarps or horizons topped
by Tierranegre re soils. The soil is deep, well drained and tends to get more heavy gravels
and cobbles with depth, although there is no evidence of any cemented aggregate.
The soil is moderately alkaline and calcareous throughout. This soil complex is
extremely permeable and retains very little water, causing root depths to be fairly deep
(60 inches or more) and thus limiting its ability to support vegetation. Since the soil is
loose, there is a strong tendency for it to erode during flash floods or by wind when dry.
The only noted limitations for urban development are the flooding characteristics and a
strong tendency for undesirable seepage of sewage in medium to high density septic
systems. In this case, all development will be on gravity flow sanitary sewers and all
sites will be above the 100 year flood elevation or protected by embankments.
2. Pinaleno-Nickel-Palo Verdes Complex#28C
The balance of the subject property is within the Pinaleno-Nickel-Palos Verdes soil
complex. The complex covers an area of gravel hills of 10 to 35 percent slopes. This unit
is 35P ercent Pinaleno, very cobbly sandy loam, 35 percent Nickel, very gravelly sandy
loam, and 15p ercent Palos Verdes gravelly sandy loam. Pinaleno tends to occur on the
shoulders and crests of the fan terraces (10 to 35 percent slopes). Nickel tends to occur
on the backslopes of the fan terraces (20 to 35 percent slopes). Palos Verdes tends to
occur on the summits of terrace remnants (10-15 percent slopes). The area tends to
appear gravelly, cobbly hill region. The soil is somewhat less permeable than
pp as a
Riverwash and Tanque Sandy Loam. The soil is also less subject to wind erosion
because of its more coarse nature. The soil group is moderately alkaline and calcareous.
Site Analysis and Tentative Development Plan 8
Grp
Rooney Ranch Area Z
WILB
WLB No. 181057-M-001
September 5,2003
At depths of
40 inches or more, some caliche may be found. The only significant
limitation to urban development is slope and a moderate permeability which limits septic
use.
1-E. Utilities
1. Sewers
The subjectproperty
econtains an 18-inch, a 12-inch, and an 8-inch sewer line (see the
Tentative Development Plan for location of lines). All sewer lines are numbered as G-89-
2 . are public These sewer lines owned and maintained by Pima County. This proposed
development will connect into the 18-inch public sewer line onsite.
Preliminary discussions with Glenn Hitz at the Pima County Wastewater Management
Department indicate that there is capacity in the 18-inch line to serve the subject
property.
2. Water
For itsotable and irrigation water needs, the subject property will connect into either the
p g
existing 8" line owned and maintained by the Oro Valley Water Utility in North First
Avenue, or thero osed 12" line to be installed as part of First Avenue improvements
p p
completed by the Town of Oro Valley.
3. Dry Utilities
The following companies are expected to provide dry utility service to the subject
P
property:
Phone: Qwest
Electric: Tucson Electric Power
Gas: Southwest Gas
Cable: Comcast
Solid Waste Disposal: Waste Management
I-F. Schools
1. The site is located in the Amphitheater School District Number 10. There are no
111 . existing or proposed public schools within one mile of the site.
l-G. Recreation and Trails
1. The 14-mile Canada del Oro primary trail, shown as Trail #2 on Exhibit D, travels
northeasterly from the Santa Cruz River through Catalina State Park to the Pinal
County line. This trail follows along the Canada del Oro Wash alignment, on the
south side of the Wash opposite from the subject property.
The 16-mile La Cholla/Honey Bee Loop connector trail, shown as Trail #33 on
Exhibit D, links up to the Canada del Oro trail, from the Canada del Oro Wash
Site Analysis and Tentative Development Plan 9 Tr��
Rooney Ranch Area Z ira'p
Viriart
WLB No. 181057-M-001
September 5, 2003
near La Cholla Boulevard to the foothills, east to the Honey Bee Wash then south to the
Canada del Oro Wash.
The 5-mile Powerline Road secondary trail, shown as Trail #180 on Exhibit D and along
the WAPA line, extends west of the subject property northward from La Canada Drive,
through Rancho Vistoso, to the Pinal County line.
The Oro Valley Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan, revised April 2002, designates planned shared
use paths along First Avenue, Lambert Lane, and the south side of the Canada del Oro
Wash. Multi use lanes are also planned along First Avenue and Oracle Road, and a
mountain bike trail is planned along the Canada del Oro Wash.
The Oro Valley Trails Task Force Report identifies Trail #328 as running through the
eastern portion of the subject property, as shown on Exhibit D.
2. As identified in the "Eastern Pima County Trails System Master Plan, " there are no
proposed trail rights-of-way located onsite.
I-H. Wildlife
1. According to the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the Sonoran
Desert Conservation Plan Priority Vulnerable Species lists, there are two State listed
threatened and endangered species potentially having habitat on the subject property.
These species are the Cactus ferruginous pygmy owl (CFPO)(Glaucidium brasilianum
cactorum) and the Lesser long-nosed bat (Leptonycteris curasoae yerbabuenae). The
Lesser long-nosed bat has a medium potential for habitat on the subject property.
Annual surveys for Cactus ferruginous pygmy owls, prepared by Michael Terrio and
included in this site analysis as Appendix D, have been negative. Further, the subject
property is outside and to the east of both the USFWS July 12, 1999 designated and
November 27, 2002 proposed critical habitat for the Cactus ferruginous pygmy owl.
2. According to Arizona Game and Fish Department data, there are no high densities of a
given species' population or an unusually high diversity of species on the subject
property.
3. While the subject property does not fall within an aquatic or riparian ecosystem, the
Canada del Oro Wash located south of the subject property falls within the
Environmentally Sensitive Lands (ESL) Riparian designations of Hydromesoriparian and
Xeroriparian, as identified by the City of Tucson Department of Transportation map
center located at http://tdotmaps.transview.org/mapguide_mwf_orovalley.htm
I-I. Traffic
Please refer to Appendix F for the Traffic Impact Analysis, conditionally approved by the Town of
Oro Valley on October 28, 2003.
Site Analysis and Tentative Development Plan 10
Rooney Ranch Area Z Fe8ipWIJIB.
WLB No. 181057-M-001
September 5, 2003
Town of Oro Valley - Trail Opportunity Analysis
1 ,,,,,,,,,,,A, ,
r,,,,,,.thwr[.:::Nan - . -
! C..tr..w.., tit../ S
!G..or,..i,;, /
1 to i
® 11 o►o vek.y Police 7
11 Su+eotallon :11.11C 0.4L411.11(
,
ARO / i ,
•• C yl
•
k i';. ,
1 L
E , /
I e /
/,' I
z. "D/ t/,ib 1/
cl 't/ 1te ,.. r-1 i
l �1 I /
J /
' 1 ♦
.
f
/ ♦ / 1 ,
i., ft 1 N331 1 i
:
PART II - LAND USE PROPOSAL
11-A. Project Overview
This project consists of a proposed single-family residential community, consisting of
approximately 152 detached, site built homes. The number of homes actually built on the
subject property will vary depending on the lot size ultimately chosen by the builder of
the community. The proposed minimum lot size is 5,000 square feet. The community
will also preserve natural, undisturbed open space as well as provide improved active
and passive recreational opportunities. Several small neighborhood parks have been
incorporated into the community and placed at strategic locations within the community
to provide easy access for all residents. This community will also provide natural
walking trails in the natural areas on site and will provide a ramp in the bank protection
to facilitate access to the Canada del Oro Wash and Trail #328. Nearly 32 acres, or
42% of the subject property will remain in its natural state, while disturbed areas will be
enhanced with newly introduced nursery stock and hydroseeding.
The proposed community is situated near the heart of Oro Valley, and will provide its
future residents many conveniences, including excellent access to roads, recreational
facilities and shopping. In addition, this community enjoys outstanding views of the north
side of the Santa Catalina Mountains and Pusch Ridge. It is an attractively designed
community and will provide a high quality living environment, meeting the demand for
single-family housing in the Town of Oro Valley.
The project will be designed in a manner that is sensitive to the natural characteristics of
the land, and will especially consider the visual impacts as measured from offsite
vantage points. As such, the majority of the site grading will occur on slopes not visible
from North First Avenue. This will preserve the integrity of the ridges, yet allow for the
onsite generation of dirt required to remove the subject property from flooding impacts
cause by the Canada del Oro Wash, and thereby allow the proposed community to
come to fruition. The project will be governed by CC&R's as well as by the development
standards and design guidelines established in the amended PAD.
11-B. Tentative Development Plan
The Tentative Development Plan is included at the end of this document in Appendix A.
In accordance with Section 3-104B of the Oro Valley Zoning Code Revised, the
Tentative Development Plan shows surveyed property boundaries and dimensions,
internal circulation, natural open space areas, adjacent public right-of-way and adjoining
vacant and developed properties.
The maximum height of any residential structure will be 26 feet. Landscape concepts will
reflect the native vegetation of the Sonoran Desert by using native, drought tolerant
trees, shrubs, groundcover, grasses, and flowers in similar associations and densities.
A separate set of development regulations have been prepared for Area Z, and appear
at the front of this document.
Site Analysis and Tentative Development Plan 12 -r
Rooney Ranch Area Zp
WLB No. 181057-M-001
September 5, 2003
I1-C. Existing Land Uses
Thero osed development has no effect on existing onsite land uses since the land is
p p
currently vacant.
ll-D. Topography
Please refer to the PAD amendment language for grading standards proposed for the
subject property. Please refer to the Tentative Development Plan for a preliminary
grading scheme for the subject property.
ll-E. Hydrology
ThisJro'ect will conform to the Town of Oro Valley Floodplain Management Code and
p
the Drainage Criteria Manual.
ThisJroject must address not only onsite flows that will be produced by the increase in
p
impervious surfaces (roads, buildings, etc.), but also the flows entering the site from the
north and flood potential from the Canada del Oro Wash to the south. This project will
employ the use of detention, where runoff is disposed of by a method of controlled
release to the Canada del Oro Wash. We have corresponded with the Army Corps of
Engineers and have received from them a jurisdictional wash determination for onsite
washes. it has been determined that there are three jurisdictional washes transecting
the property. It is the intent of this project to operate under a Nationwide Permit and
disturb less than half an acre of jurisdictional wash. The jurisdictional washes have been
identified on the Tentative Development Plan. We have met with and discussed the
project in detail with Robert Dummer of the Army Corps of Engineers, and he has
indicated that a Nationwide Permit is appropriate for this project. The western wash will
be slightly realigned, while the central wash will be realigned and directed into the
eastern wash. The eastern wash will remain undisturbed and remain in its natural
condition.
A portion of this project has been designated by the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) as lying within a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA). As such, in order
to remove this portion of the property from the 100-year floodplain of the Canada del Oro
Wash, a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) must be reviewed and approved
by FEMA and then followed up by a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR). This procedure will
occur in conformance with Town of Oro Valley Department of Public Works Operating
Procedures and Directive No. 28. Also, in accordance with the Intergovernmental
Agreement between the Town of Oro Valley and Pima County where Pima County
governs washes with flows greater than 3,000 cfs, the CLOMR submittal will conform to
the requirements of the Pima County Floodplain Management Ordinance.
As mentioned earlier in this site analysis, base flood elevations have been established in
the Canada del Oro Wash by FEMA. The Tentative Development Plan identifies base
flood elevations determined via a HEC RAS model to determine the effects of
encroachment into both the Canada del Oro Wash and the wash on the eastern portion
of the subject property. Per the Town of Oro Valley Floodplain Management Ordinance,
Site Analysis and Tentative Development Plan 13
Rooney Ranch Area Z Retp:WIAB
WLB No. 181057-M-001
September 5, 2003
100-year water surface elevations cannot be raised more than one foot. The Tentative
Development Plan demonstrates compliance with this ordinance.
A completeY
hydraulic and hydrologic drainage report, prepared by a professional
engineer, will be submitted with the preliminary plat.
Il-F. Sewers
Sewer service for the project will tie into the 18-inch PVC public main already located
within the property boundaries. Sewers will be constructed within the rights-of-
wayt subjectp P Y
of this development and will connect into the existing PVC sewer lines.
Preliminary discussions with Glenn Hitz at the Pima County Wastewater Management
Department indicate that there is capacity in the 18-inch line to serve the subject
property.
II-G. Water
The subject property is within the service area of Oro Valley Water Utility, and for its
p P Y
domestic and fire flow demands will be served by either the existing 8" line in First
Avenue or thero osed 12" line to be installed as part of the First Avenue improvements
p p
completed by the Town of Oro Valley.
Thisjroect will meet all of the requirements of the Town of Oro Valley Water Utility.
P
Il-H. Schools
1. Below is a description of all public schools that will serve the site:
Painted Sky Elementary School is located approximately 2 1/2 miles northwest of
the subject property on Woodburne Avenue, west of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard.
Cross Middle School is located on Chapala Drive, east of La Canada Drive and
south of McGee Road in unincorporated Pima County. The school is
approximately six miles southeast of the subject property.
Ironwood Ridge High School is located on the southeast corner of West Naranja
Drive and Shannon Road, approximately four miles west of the subject property.
School Enrollment Capacity % of
Capacity
Painted SkyElementary School (K-6) 694 800 87%
Cross Middle School (7-8) 965 1,250 77%
Ironwood Ridge High School (9-12) 1,559 2,250 69%
Source:Amphitheater School District
Project Increase to Affected School Tax Base (based on 2002 figures)
(Amphitheater School District)
Site Analysis and Tentative Development Plan 14
Rooney Ranch Area Z fOUp
A 1113
WLB No. 181057-M-001
September 5, 2003
Average assessed home value in area: $208,568
g
Average amount taxed(based on assessment): $20,857
b. property Average tax (total rate of 14.6727%): $3,060
Percentage of tax taken for school district: 7.0%
Number of homes in proposed development: 152 (may vary)
Projected increase for schools tax base: $32,558
Based upon the best available data, there will be approximately 144 school age
students in the proposed development
Estimated Number of Students from New Development *137
Elementary age
e 77
Middle School age 30
EHigh School age
30
* Based on a recommendation from the Arizona School Facilities Board that an individual house
generates 0.9 students.
The demographic makeup of this development may consist of residents who are
retired. As such, the projected number of students may be overstated. Also, the
percentage e of students attending the public school system may be overstated
due also to demographics.
2. No schools abut the site.
II-I. Recreation and Trails
1. Several small neighborhood parks have been incorporated into the community
andlaced at strategic locations within the community to provide easy access for
all residents. Recreational areas will be provided p r vided on a ratio of 1 acre per 85
dwelling units. Three active recreational facilities will be provided (i.e. boccie
court, volleyball court, half basketball court, horseshoe pit, etc.) and three
passive areas for recreation will be provided (i.e. turf area, benches, picnic
tables, shade structures, barbeque grills, pathways, etc.) This community will
alsop rovide a ramp in the bank protection to facilitate access to the Canada del
Oro Wash and Trail #328. Nearly 32 acres, or 42% of the subject property will
remain in its natural state, while disturbed areas will be enhanced with newly
introduced nursery stock and hydroseeding. These recreation areas will afford
excellent views of the Santa Catalina Mountains and Pusch Ridge.
Asreviousl mentioned, the Oro Valley Trails Task Force Report identifies Trail
p Y
#328 as running through the eastern portion of the subject property. As part of
this development, ramps will be built into the bank protection, affording future
residents easy access to Trail #328 and to the Canada del Oro Wash. As part of
Site Analysis and Tentative Development Plan 15 ��VVhh
Group
Rooney Ranch Area Z ..
WILII
WLB No. 181057-M-001
September 5, 2003
the platting process, the alignment of Trail #328 through the subject property will
be dedicated to the Town of Oro Valley.
2. The common and recreation areas will be owned and maintained by a
homeowner's association, and the portion of Trail #328 running through the
property will be dedicated to the Town of Oro Valley.
3. As identified in the Eastern Pima County Trails System Master Plan, there are no
designated trails onsite. This community will, as stated earlier, provide access to the Canada del Oro Wash and to Trail #328.
II-J. Wildlife
1. It is the intent of this project to avoid all areas which may contain sensitive wildlife
habitat.
A biological evaluation for threatened and endangered species will be submitted with the
preliminary plat.
11-K. Development Criteria
The following is a tabular summary of the development criteria, comparing the proposed
criteria with the existing criteria:
Category Proposed Existing
Lot Size 5,000 sf minimum 8,000 sf minimum
Front Setback 10 feet (20 feet for garage) 20 feet
Rear Setback 15 feet 25 feet
Side Setback 5 feet (10 min. between bldgs) 0 feet
Building Height 26 feet Same
ll-L. Visual Impact Analysis
The images shown in Exhibits E-0 on pages 18-27 illustrate the visual impact of the
proposed community, graphically measuring the current setting against the proposed
P Y
development condition.
The area in which the proposed community is located offers outstanding views of the
north side of the Santa Catalina Mountains and Pusch Ridge. The development of this
proposed community will not block or in any way disturb the existing views of the
mountains as seen from adjacent properties.
The subject property is visible in limited areas from Oracle Road, and in particular from
P P Y
the area in the vicinity of Home Depot located at Oracle Road and La Reserve Drive.
Due to limited visibility and due to its distance from Oracle Road, the subject property in
its developed condition will not detract from the visual experience as motorists travel on
Oracle Road. This is illustrated in Exhibits M and 0 on pages 25 and 27.
Site Analysis and Tentative Development Plan 16 Folu3Rooney Ranch Area Zp
W 1.33
WLB No. 181057-M-001
September 5, 2003
The subject property, particularly the portion on the west side of the ridges, is also visible
from First Avenue, as evidenced in Exhibits F and G on pages 18 and 19. The post-
developed condition1 of the subject property does not impede any views as seen from
First Avenue.
II-M. Traffic
pp
Please refer
to Appendix F for the Traffic Impact Analysis, conditionally approved by the
Town of Oro Valley on October 28, 2003.
Site Analysis and Tentative Development Plan 17 irkiwisBRooney Ranch Area Z
WLB No. 181057-M-001
September 5, 2003
es
.--
-/,. )tet, ..,
r , \
.7
v.
•. ,_r 7
, i ,\ 7 '
NARANJA DRIVE,0 / ,,,
0
a
/
w
g kw 't --/:-• --00 ,--\
zyz
wilat. a 1\:..,
7ZZ Za
AN pQ
�. 7 vo . 40111MINo'..". - 0- .Y 4 Alin=isi. r, , Z
elle » ppm*��©�
o VIM .
. �---\ 0 -- M /
ite, 40 I » - PROPERTY
aft
0*IN i -" BOUNDARY V\ \ / 4 s„,., ,,,,,
0 ,,,_:i. 4400,/ 0,,,,,
o
1 Z,,,-.0- :Ail% _. ,
/ ",.P'''Z \\\ '0-' ce -__ / ,
..• c\, ." ,./
sal >;„-. , di \ .., \
\'',-P,,''\ /- . _ \
liar 1 \-74,s\ z7 t)4(E)pi\81 L-7 \ . \\\ .___)/
. \\A N. --.- 4
t$° 74
)40$ ALBERTSON'S\ a-
�o�' aRN•
\ \
FRY'S \\ /:'' {���
TARGTC
%t
E \ \ET, �
/ 11114M1
'
/ / , 1
\ , t A IN, II
\,( N // ,
N / , \ /IP Moms i _,_s \
. i--- X ', \ , , , 1 , ‘44P ' JA V--p------i
0 e4w.„ 4 />_ 17,_
, / N . `." , c\,/\ A •
\--N.'?
111/� N� ♦
# 000#4
,...$,
, .i. wit . -,.\ \,
1 \
\\, or WIWI" la \ X
, 7 \ -� y MINN / s A/
I Si ,/ / /'
2
----- 0 \
Ir '
/ \ \11
- 'N\
�• N
\\\\ \
\ 1 §.
h G
L
a
Li
t
x
EXHIBITE w
Visual AnaI sus POto LOCa ons
a
ROONEY RANCH AREA Zi,
1" = 600'
A 76.5-Acre Portion of Area A) .x,,
-,,,
/N '
The L.
D 09.05.2003
WLB .� D WLB No. 181057-N-001 Mr
0
Group °°
18
coot °p0'deS :PeUoid 6MP'o3ogd–d l!q!4X31uogeo iddy pue s!sAleud e1 S\d ieoJed\LSO l8 L\:1
W E ��
' ®O
4
R :-. o0
< .. , _s.,„ ,„..;,..,
, -' --,14 _ '
O
Z
a
CIO
J
•
• P i O
4
{ '4 E
,,,s
t,, 1
1,-,-, , o
1
E N
E o
4 i _
-it .. • _ < .........,
Q
. fr < t LLI <
�yf a O n Ce 0
td
C 1. <"
:;:- ' - O �`)l
•
• _ L.L.
J
' --:,.. -: -c -I V) U (S
,. m > a'' Zf.,11—
O CL
0;
, X 0 Q
r._.' 1:- - L1J C ...0 (Z a)
,.-.-, 0,, , c) o
,,. ® O
>- <-..... , _ __........- ,
* ' ' ...._ a) -_-_-- -(5- 5., " LLJ I")
. 0 , L.... ,t-_ 0 (-
f..f., ,v ai c Q)
D Z .0
.7.- -,. L., o
:,, . i; ..0 U
,..,_- R .,_(/2 7,0 0
. , , .,..1. . ,,._ ,i14.. i ,.:, ...__ -0 u o i
3 N — Q) �C
C QJ
t-_- 00Q) > Z
� � O C � .... ,...... 0 ,==.--=
O
' ' , *t
{ X 0
ilk „,
0 CY
A 0r (Y.?, Z
.,, ,4*, ,,,,,...kit -4-- D
) O
11, E- a
e C •- O
., ,Jo, ,. .. ,., -!:•,,,_-...,
i Ln• 3 o Q)
`�� c O -C
} Q C U
A d U Q)
, foo ��
00
O C "' Q
' U U O D V
K . o) Q
.. . ;1,.. ,1N
i >. L
Q
c: . , ,, - .. ._
00
-- it. ' .' ,--° CI
W z 1 6 O
i
i __
r
-
10
E00Z 'b0"daS :Peeald 6Mp•0a04d J 3!4l4X31U09e3!Iddy pue s!sAleuy GPS1y IeoJed1LS01-81•1:1
I. '.
0 0
UJ •
O U a) ETi ` OIC
,. LO
a c co
411
-mo, < ..
o - Q) . •
+- 0
o c
o o
Z
I sow' :
£00Z 'PO-daS :PeUold 6Mp-ologd H 3!4!4X31uopecilddy pue sisAleuy el!S1y f93Jed\LSOL9L1:1
co
--60 0
ce A -4 ai:...,6-.--,„ 1
.0 s ,72',.
t N.
W 'pis e 4: *'. ON.
1c 0 4 _ _ ON
F". . i ' ?1%.''V0a.l.t.:i (1) 0 c•D
LL .
,: off:
Q 4.43 r L c
o c q)
' E -t.-. 4-- • - Z
j - �,'
O -J
Ov,
"- O
• — L O Q
n-1 L
D C T, a •
W
= )i .' r.' , , 4_,...4...--. o (1.)
_ Bt • 0
-= r UQ — E
0
s O O
_
_ ` t sa t C -0 CU C
. � r4 Q 4)
•
• . 0.) Q_ c C• (1) ri
ti <
_ .„„__
, . z , (J3LU <
, -
.9), CZ 0
• ,
. •
, 4, ,,,,. 0 -2 < (1)
. .
. r. _ . , Q
= 4-0
, -.-40,4.k. 04 ' -- =I_ a_ „ c
. 1 ._ .; .
. . 4.4„,„-..4, A- -,' --1— 0
. 4,0-.- , . ,,,,,,,. 1_,..,„ •........ Z .-1-:=
e -i �,.w.• 00 °fes Q
>. c)
'� #i
1 0 2) < a_4`,,,. :4 ' -,- .-•,,- .-:',-.'41 'il'' *.---- X ..‘ 4 CZ (D
O
{
r Iii i'- (***f >— <
r. ; k. '_4 t 0L1JLJR
•
.. .7 . ....., r.,„, ui
.; ......,,,,, • . . .... . 0 ti)
., . ft . ., , . = IP" - . ' • 4SsZ
' ' D .Z
'At :.:fr4,. - '-7 .
.--- q) 0 <
,r- 1 ''',.1 , > :2
I 4 • t
t-' .. .s moi_
':: "I'' - i it . .,
.i.,4,.t, 0 0
. ' J - _. :i•..iiti- 1:_tit , _ 4... -4„: ..„:„,
7 .' �t
. if V 4' .4* 4..."1, _ -
I a1
. -4 - --' -.
i f
. `•,.4: . .:. , .... ,....
, . 4 , ,
-- .
r,•• ,
t ....... .. . .ri ........
E
, .
, .:t. .„..
. . .
-_•.,
tom ` -. ,. . _ O ^/
,, -...vi „„),„ . '.x i ,.._,-
0 CD
XT
4 a. ,-t, I, .. ' .. '. - . * .(I) J H
' ' ' - - PI- i
. .. • .,,,,,
.._ •.,
• _--- Q)
-.
W .. L
„� .!
1 .'- I
EOOZ 1b0•deS :Peliold fohiP•cogd I lq!yx\uoa;eo lddy pue s!sAjeuy el1SW I9OJed11S01.9 I.V 1
C7 I—
!a i . ••., 0 0
• • z O
:-...-1‘ .- • ... ., :11..-4 . .•. , 0 o a) t
• i ' - .. .ii,,,, ..-:7-..:-.t. ::. ... _:.-_ o ;-_-_-. r-_
■
, ,.,,c_ •f- c,.L°
•
••.til•,. • I .♦ ^• +- u� *V
? ` ✓
♦ VCD
4
.• . 5
. �
t mF... s x.., �. RU
i -• ♦. . -
c.,`.)+3 • .+r U P.
i
7.i.t,',rf-8: ,•,-.. .• u C--')—-It
.. ... Q < ..........,
Q J W <
. • .•-. ,
_. t .
O
• t . - -c (Z 0
..
4. .•, • , .i. . .
t
,,..s• 0 -t ,e '1_). • •
. • 4-- z
`
oQ 4-
I ,�
r ° Io
, s,- 1 ; -.. -_-___ Q U c
-w
N a�- i— .
tZto
X Q Q
• L1J c .(`) fv. 0
`4,..., 0
'44 .:.... 4 < 46 > . <
, a ,.... ... "..... Ili I
16, i 0 Zk)I
';-- irt I .. ‘. . i:i ' f4. '... • "17,`.. 0. > I ) 0 <
1.
} i l' 1 �.
,.%,.'"; 't- . . . . .., :.... -i j E 0
,„--... .. . .. _ o
!if. - ; _ ::'' -'-- . 1 - -- t k
. , 1 Ai
„,, t, : „Ili . 't. 1 v..
--'''::' *- ''.:,- .‘;1%\it......,j-1'4"-''t'''' ' '
�i a 1.,,,�'.ice- + .: -
.! \**:.--''' ''''.... .-.L.*:.4:
:riellki
. \�, e-�:.. r' tip`
' -oY .2.^-., 'i' . • . _ • ` ' ;tea, • `
11 . ; /
LLIii L___________13__.
0 -•,'-..t \
.,... \.' • Il.." \ LLJ !
_._- ' Via ,1... \ ,
i
< N v-s,:I-,-„. i , , co n
CO
k . 0 , 0 ,
__....,, ..._
. ,._
C., ..... ,_
_ ,•
. , 1 1.-- 0
. ____ -. ', - .-__f____ ____ _ _ , _ _________
77
COOZ 'b0'deS :Mold bMp•o3ogd f 3!q!gxluole3!!ddy Pms!sfgeuy 921SW IaciJed1LSOL8L1:1
_ C'7
0 0
j. • N ,
`r ..ate ,.• ♦ Z
of
•
•
i..i. ra`� ,.,,..„,,•
• .," '• 'fit, •
_ •
Y E 0 r
LU
°. • -� 0 0
,Vii -"i I
Q �J
V. a ! ZO
:. 7
R. ^ ~
-,.„ ,1 i Q
i5
a4. .
',orf, r Y f- ' •`
,__,,,_, , t
T•`
f , S- ). `-t3
-,_.:-.i!--- I A
..t*..„; lc CI
,'•xr .'•, 1
_it%,,f - • ,.-t)::,•••,. ,, -.,,,- i 0
_f t i
1O
, . t.j. ,i i ,......: „.L.., •'.e.• li-•4e,4 % ri
CI
. •i'If's' :416 ‘ O < .„..__
.0- - -.- -,.44,,.„i'!>3.t.s.-tai, ELI QL LU <
2-: :. 4,...1.41_ .: a _
..-,•,,,- _. ,,,,," 2.,t ....... ce a
• ta;•?* '.--41-4'a• O 2 < 0
,.,c <
-1-11-,7C1-
'yam* = •` •; �'ki t 14'. °. �_ •�
• a. 7,', „, l ilt ♦ i,f.
.R
Y �� ,- 0
Y'
--C = 0
AM
• , . .12....12....: .« I t
..s_ (..) c
., : . it• ''' '''
.......
_, 1,,,...:,•,!!...” , V) a 0
',. ,,, _I
�a y Y
1 :,...'...,i,(z.I', A f':'. 1.----- .(1) Z -1—
'71- :17, ' ' :.''''' t• 4 i CO >, ?.,q) 0
F
' ' 1 TN- '0 < C1—
f
z �, - wC z ce
, 0
6',-.---4.:-....,1-`.,,,,- . . < _Qz) >-- <
_ � ;it,. .' . 4..444 1 �.a t •
_ a Y '
•.,.,,
Lo
_ f 't \ LUi5
-.,,,,. .-....--- ._.- ,-,:,., ;• ,-, i-,,,,.. 0 0
,.
Q' Z
^ .ate' � Rt W (5 9•-
-.- ...c ,..... :t--.... > 46 0 <
, 4.,i , ...- •-f), o o a) E -11..... 0
_,� firC. • - r F' a y.L� w -0 o -.
Ce1.,`-1 yit . _p i ,Sy6.`y'` •_ `. O
♦ _mo , ' ' OC + 1_
# c - O E
sa, ..„ 0
-0
'L"s-,-. '.‘41,-.- ,
'
W. -•, , O O..I1it •.{ T. 0 N ..._, a
-z
; ---es ° a -4—
.1*- „.*', :;.4_,''',,,„'-'ii.‘,47,--:,,j'. '4::"'tq."',..i - = lo "+-c- Si a E
- ' .. . ., .'-vi -..r...): - --,---.%•.: • c •- a.) ,..._ 0
-:44,- -..-.-:..7, •,-,-.:,.. - .. .. .
• , ,„ ..r.,..4
......,12.,,,,-,,,, . :-_ ,... .
,..... ..1.7 a..- d,..
of_�•- 7'•♦• i t 9• :•, I.r,...4 .C T U 1\ (.----...v.----„,
al ' • a
tn Ci CD
,-, ,,, I- t Y ,• C v J
S E a a --L
` o c
Z H.
W { C O C
0 ., . ,. -, . ,., - .
y I .,,
CO 4
O
- , , ., • •-,:, ,, F-
. ,
• . : . .. _. :
_ __
.1
23
£00Z 11+0'des=PeUoid 6IAP'oo4d )!i!q!gx31uol1eo!tddd Pue eleAleuy e1!S1d I93aedUS019111
:' 0 0
-
ice 1/. '
j o r.
--
I .;-
OO
LL , ,0,,,,,:: , co
Q ,_ 7O
4'
QZ
U CO
J •�411Irt -i
•
+'4 �.)
1
k ' Q)
Q.
Q.
i f
r
s
• �v
13. 0 , t...• ,,, , ...4, •• a tfa_)
• ♦
333) • i.
Q.
4 . { N S' :,f...
rif 11
i . -
0 < ,„„,........
or . ,••1•,„... I.L. 14 ILI <
IV''''‘..tirticit* i' .; - • -itir''..."..., ' --
.• -, .dt W „rtC)
7, I * ..'.,.1 0 0 w
♦ 4-- n <• Q�
......
{ O o
T•
.. Cij5
,....._
, \
wi t
_. . .,.„0,,,, .r ,`
-, . ; V
, .
...... -- v) (1) (io
. ..
4 . Z �
, t• , -!SF:- is* it .4 4 , 4,,,
, #., , . ca >, („)
0
,� .. ., z -. • . , •_,
ie .„, ,,
• 1 ' " * .=Mit •IMMO
A . n`
.--v.-ii, .
-•,-,- ..- -- 1 0
) .,... 4*le . •, :
(jib.. W
C 04.. w 0
ts
,..., ,. .
__, „.,..,,_,,,, ___
:.,.. , .4..., ..c z.....!.....,„
, ' CD•.•• < ."...' 0
, '", - • Z Q. U ..... >„,,,„ <
: ,A , ...4....‘..• - • /..„, • , •• .jr, -c o:1--- E - ....z u j .
. w-6 -5 0 0 "trN . Lo
UoU
na
z .'oN
4 O C .� •— „ 0 _.,..
... W:.. ..fit.�.-
llt
0
O
gyp:• 'k .yZ`"�''��t�y '` �• O W :2
`-` '" �'►,. _ y .t'. - W--Q) \
' O
., • C 's• U Q)
x � Eoo. E
---... ___ . ::,-. D E U O
,„ it-: )•.-,,,. .,;..
. -.--_,..- 0 c
, ,. ,. .' U U U -U 0
.. . t., -- - x
. .. • -Ntie , .7111-
ihi,
, . . . 4r - 'alf at;.. .% v
' s'"'t E E
• •. ..,
j�+!w+•� L0.♦ r
W
0
24
£OOZ 'P0'deS :Pefo d 6MP"Oogd l)q!4x31uoge3!Iddd pue sisi(leuy e s y IeOJed1LS01911:1
CO
--,..710`1:5,4 0 0
-,,,-- v", - , .
'� c O
f \ :
< i * - ..1,-#;40..._ ,,
.1 ,y.f...,-14,- ....-Y;4:.,,-.lei:*. _ *
Z
. .,... ...;.-._*-ft.;;*.ii.,), „.. .., .......
4 ,
u ca
L.
` `>�.' W
A
c f.
•l'�f,"'t.+ice +, t r.r'� i 'i•" 0
. r•J
yr ,Y,* 1, . .. .
,- 4,......., <
Mme�` ` - .. 0 OLu <
•NP • 4.* ' , . 01) Ce 0
. 0 a < .1)_._ ,
. ,....4., .
•
. .
Q
., oQ
4-
IP .01' r n‘U = 0
-0, 25,,,,
) c
- (1) J 0
.... }
NZ
( >, „...Z < 0
Ar
--7-.....-...,:: X 0 ..2
, ..
. _3 ,. i $3.)
r `
1 IA':."4„7:4' (I) .1)--..-.... --a >:, U-I c Q Ce 1....
... T R z -ti •w Q.yam.. < 13
ce U
fe
{ ! >-- <
1, ,,. , , O a N
.. _ , i-1
...._ o 0 - z LLJ Lo
- iiiv, . , .....,.., . A-,,,. ....,,,. . .---.....--- ,
" * .._:--- . ' 4';rtif..•) ,t'i -. ' VI, , 0 c k- 0 0 -t
NM . ---''- .Pt*41-47 4......!,!.,4 4 4t, i:'...,
ter ' `-` sz. 4 -c O
- 2 : ,- X.... .-- -- , .*.y?.. E -17,- 9- ° .Vj Z 0 _ e
o (1) > (3)
�� ,�� ` -0 a
9Y
T.,, ,V. w o ,,c 2 0 0
t f.t'1i. ' W L W ^
OM Citi: = •�
t
,
U 0D E
- :fr.:,-, , .
ti. ,,, IE D a) c
E
te. ;_ 44-- D
T, Ei.h
MO W , ., �O L_____i____.
0
LL.. _ `�..r
w {7a hr i
•r ;
CO 0
.. vr, moi/ O
s'•
25
£OOZ `b0'des :pellold 6AV-0104d W i!q!4X31uope3!Iddy pue s!sAjeub 8115W 180 d1LSOlUIX1
CO r—
OO
.,, O O.' ; 1t, CN 7
Q .i t 4,•,, O N
At
�F Re 0
CZ i
t. ;.11,.. . ‘'."t .''‘.;;1 4,....., 4.
z
r I `_� a t«•...
:-.,,it K°. i f~ '`...i,404:
3ic"''
...; . , it . mr 4- _r_q,,,-ti (1)
< ' ' . ;4.7-44/, • '.. -," it ii. .,
r L 1 '' +-aa
-4-7.')1,1'!-,.... ....'r,,,.. , tn
't, ' - - iki-
et.
1 , ',
r
'3;� 4„. �4L.. ..N` O
t n I +i ,s '' „t ,r- . w,-„„,-,,,,:.,......_fi
_ � I ii,' ,'-:� ' 0
r
- •-•,,\‘ ? guy �� r 4, if R
4 4-1.eif.....r..-1
,...14.t.ri.)--, ,,:"
Ali t 0
\ . ,, ,:,.c... ,..;., „fr.:
-:-.-flicap, ,.. .
` t 1-di..- ,,, ....: .4..Y42/ C L
, „flit-' N 44., III
.y
.- ... <
%.-; ' -''': . ,,,,,, , :: ,\ - T '!:1' ,!' 4 , ,;.7, °6
Q 1.1.i <
• — - ' • 0
tit)i7i, .
3. ,.... 1 U < L.-
' • \ "". .. ,.-,.. : (I) <
U C
4o A�
= O
-,, _, -,- ._,-_, , _ .! - -, r.. w. --- -. 0 :2 0
m p` �1--- -C '.? Z CI O
V:V)
4LC---1C)
aa_U
, 4 alimilii ........ >,.... <
'\ . -- ' * • -,.:,', .
. ' '".t.-!'k?!.44 f It kii 0 0 LLI ,
1.0
x -io-ii ,-, ,, C Q
Q .t''e-.•. Z N f3r
E ,.
J
' 7 .4L'A:,1 .... .... V 0 <
• ._
M\ . . .. ..,-, ,
# } `4. .
s
......._.
t A e
yx
c) (1)
r
‘ ,,. , .,- i -.4- -
,t. '..:.*- 7' -4'••‘:1.1.I,'.nt r',...; D "
0
. „ , _ _ -,3,-4.4
. ,t et - - - v ,
, v) o
' `, °- c.),
&st \ i _-.4 i
$ .� >, •
tr _ -
.\ _ ,
L.
\ \ c
\\.\ \
a
•
' O:‘
:.-: t:
-I 1 F 's,77..‘
`1 �, p. R a 5 .♦
„ 4
,
r , r t„. - i.r O
11
Li]
err�,. rt ”' ?
• T
. \\
1R
0 -. ....1......4.44:a'-‘
LL ,,,: .
LLQ L.
��
..E30 i
7A
EOOZ 'b0"deS :pallold 6Mp-op4d N i!q!4x3\uoi)eoiiddy pue sisAieuy al!S\y IeoJed\LSOlgI\:1
CO
0 0
Z._
Lo tmI
s
t E.a k/ O
W Lo
/„..„, „. ., •, 4-..-: r- , ,,: ,_
,° 4 �- • - O
:::::'.!;,-,:::::..-• -•••.••::' . - ii A--
- . •
#-A �L
' '
s - ii.',Ist‘f..,-
4:7-s.!
xAC'r ' - - C
R , p
L.
r" C .+i
0
.,,,,, , . ..*(.....,, .4,
r Aims..,. A s ,..,' -,:.
, .• ' .
E
,. , ,
„,,,, ..-_,' t •r•.. o
.!,-......:...,_! ..
r••1
, ...,, ,._..
... . 47,:Ai. ., • L.
:.:,,,..-z-,_4„, tx..-. .... -i,-*, ,j,,',..",-.4':r:- <
(1) UJ <
x
.y o
,..... .
..,.,
4-..,.k'4'''A�f r �y'.
. 41,-- rl 'rnt < <1-C.
,_-__:.t.,,„.., 7. .,..44.
.„, r sk = O
cl.. -.Q...,
,. _._ . . _
,....,,. ,..,,s_ _ ,.. z v, ,—, u g
.. .., 4, -
-f ' i'1'_ ' .
s Q)
A
. I--- V) ,z Z
' • ''- i� A�
i `
CO T 0
f`A A
�i
cii= .:',.:-4 ''.. :'-.-"-.- 1 0 r., 0-
ai�+.!a wa �.:- _.. -
. ,Z.'t• ., .. ' 11116"'"-- -'T 7,•-,_.,:e.',"4,0(',-,'''.7,..- X C 2
.-,......,•_ • . .. , - ,_.., f,,,,,,, ., U-.1 ,"e
tit , --,.- ,, Q) Q) -.......- --6 >.,-
.-- 6 c 0) <
x = ? OC) O � •� LLJi
O -0U ° 3 O No
- 0 ...c •........ 6 0 <
O c -
-__''......_ ,,} 1`;,, • ;. I -0 CD C (1) (?) 0
a) 0 c 2 C2e
o
-7= /4.1-t,.r ` i pc U Q)
.-:-._ 1.-f_,,,,,
Y a� � a i fin
.' A -#..4 -- _. D O O O 00
: . 0
Z h
r . A►* It Q
E
i.';.‘,= 3-' : -1,--,4 '''' ,' ., ,
,.: . , .. .
• i o
L_,
,,
-1. „
4.$-# -- , -, ,,,
,........
0 .
--. _ : ,.. : - '44' 4-1: ....Lt.: _ 1
i ;
LLi '' .:• ',,i;*:':**'-i'' -:' ----- -:-. ' .`' -:#';,:t-,, F
D
x1 , ,, ao
-
27
£OOZ °170`daS :pa101d 6Mp•ologd O 3!q!L113\uolle3!Iddy pue s!sAeuV aPS\d Iealed\LSO686\:1
C)
r -..... 6,7
O O
CZ
- •it 4'''''k
, , , ,;:,..„.:..-c2.71....:-7
•Z
w1 ''' -...,„4.,:lt.t.-,,, . V O�
4 CO
T.,-
LL t ,F
< [,-. 1/4- I Z
. O
o
1 E
-v, ` . ,!
U E-` 0
',,,,. -,; \
E
*-- -Y.tr \ :
.rt: ' ,c._ ' \ Q.,
cl., .1... < 0,...--..
C:i Ci l ') (1N(.) LU <
ista.'7'.I'l::-i' ' '`C.'.' Ce °
4 t ----1---4 i 0 0
O 4)
-, . <
`.—
= O
i . . a c
O �„ O
. i. '... ''' ( ) 0 Z '
tb--,,, . 1 ..,.... s......
- o 0
r _. _
x c z iy a)
.- ' rt . •• LLJ
< 0) 0
.:N2 >"' <i
N c
O o 0O J LO
,,V a� u 0 D Z .'O
° 0 � a) CnO
.— Z 0 _,
O c -.-- L
> ° .sk'Li- 4---: x
0 (I) 0
t';: :411: 4 i 0 . -..,„ -- •. , \ _c 0
uhf
` V
3
IP -• a
r r ,
�' .^ E 0 O
.` = o c N J
s. r �r
�- * -c V W v, U 0_ •
- a a,
---` 1
, tet,•„. T , .......Q. 0
.t *., :.c a O
LLI ,: L
U
, . O
O L.0
LL •. E
LUk
i
28
�
/Y`
e
P.
• ,s,
' ' ...*4—'''''' 4,,, ',,* 1:141 r:If C:'
• ;.. t,•.��L t mo w} , *� ,�•�..,„ - ~,�...¢' kw
, 4 J -.
r": tit TS
(+^�1..v� `C.qa I { ��,4•..•�.a
t jr"C'� • �.. ,r'• ,+r�4„s.! f ;'�, ,.''',•;`,.:.-.*.' ;
�,.«.,r,fir^ .:.#!' ,.,,. 3b>A,< l 7f1. 4.rZ•s \• 14 + �"' J4 1Yy t L '.-'u^A. �`� '� x�,.:''tty' ••.
ttifY••'ii q,: 1"� A'+-. ,.^�iw. 1�`, \ £ f t' '--.''''.:; ;:ii,.*".!...,-
a.A j•..1'1,,,,'11f,''
.j•r a * fie ^1"�"' ,a�• j*• +•Y`�••�
~ x FF44 T 7 . 7i "'•- • .."4, `.ta{�c R •.A'' J l *,r'. :I ., ��.S+ , r
�.r +!'�, • * Lw. - •� • A - a� _ it a... ti ii "i „,„-•.,(:-.
,„ '' .*{r y'r7'4"t{ !
•
t,+,17:4.:4
g ,� •"b` �„ �, ��, »-*t9,.. • 'ti r+L :':•'+f,r• ;- j�
i;,....
I
»r..,•x". I I "+�Y , -r."r. _... 1�1 irt` A':Itw ."3.«t' ,.. - �" +I" d'4iw` °tt E
LI.DAR Y {
�t•�' "r,. ak'�af� � ��1+'L,4r „,i-1--,,
+ s. �,^3! t•$>• �•f ,�i�/' v"�1'YI1�
• a .r ° .�'•"`�'fx • k „�9r t "i „.k -1`r t a 4+jar ,*4,,-,:e,
,,-,:• t1
,:. , f P.;
;r” ,- -4,` 7 ,• 1 ,"1,,,,,,,
y1,, ti - M 1 p}1rt,.„ • l 14,,,...-.41,- ,-,,,,:,.1.!,,,,-, ,4,-;t y
t Y `°^v +y� ... /.1
. p*7 • 'L• 'A 1,'p'►' ,4
,-,,vi, 1...- .
• .....
, .,,..— • t-,.. .1-,..,.....2,4,4,,, i -... -. ._• .„,, ,,,,- --.. .:i ,; ,,.
+>♦ ,€ 1 7 ihy ,," -,`„,u21
''•*a , • �� 4 0.s. +t �.+� ,v+i yew``,<fit`.
' i «r ax'''. a , �.i 1a..
• .1 r '°itl:f.t.
1"� �. r"�"�L- ., +..rr• 4�" •r� � �.R ��k r b'�� `w ,,.. � �, � �i ,...,,,,,,;,1,:•: L. --,-1, ..„.-„, .,.v.,,„4.,
, ,,..,,.., - ..- .,,..„.1 .4,..f. ,,,,,zt,...7..-_
• • ,. ,.. ,
H-:,,,,4•,'',
,: ..,,,,,,,.,.
sto) 4. - ..... .., -_......-,
,--,::' ...-,,:., _ _ • . ' ;i: -,.,• ,
I
:-,.,,,t — ,,,„,
...,...
• i
.. ,„„-t.„..„?..- ...,- ,., ,, I, . ,,
s.,. 6 #Aw.a i {, ,z,:,. .. .2..-,....., ,., ,,..; .,.-,--; a ey .+ �n}♦ bt a,,, "�r 6 `• , ,, r w
k':� to t.r. �.:..tsa .Tt' d��!•-....„......„,-,-„•.,„7.,„4,,,,,,...„,,,x-,
, ` '�”'� .}�• AIC ,�� � �...r � r�!j+. r• �-� �,
•
,, .......,,,,,,,„
++. •_ ,r,. �A+y+,r3 6, ,' � ' '1'', t5 _ i ::,,,,,,.:17,L.... ..-
j}j,,,, o',..,1r-,,ii.-::
Y.� l`• � "2 j• A..,+� ,
`+ ..- • 4,< r .1.,‘,,z,„7"!
, ! '#/t S Yf.Ye^. }i 1 r .'W, * « M. 9+. n
����• `�"M..+. f o-O � 3 1 �`'M.� � 'Y.�s � ... �. f"AA. r,, i`�,�� ff � ._
I
, ..„.
_. r t
� ",,,,,...„...;?-11.*.'''
w -
s ♦ [
".41 .. # "" r ,.dP f-1:411.:,•`...:,,.
�'+."% .._]r••f: w `� xZ^'‘,"i 1'..:::!::::
3:a J.r :11:2.1:**';1.94:7-;./.74.::::%
LS
, . — -,i, Nt ,.-,k,,,,.. •
‘„,2",*,;1*,,410:k.,,.t.**,,...,..,,,. . !.
- ---..:
.---- i,--• '
"�3s }'$.. ^y#a�ty , 'AI "'��.`rAr �::?tAC `• �,*,..7-‘4':::14.-7.4.:::.7.':',:::;'
..l�i.` V♦. ,tea., � .� ��.
...., .
-,:- ,-.',- . i ' 7;10:1:, -' .. ,..(.5.' t. */N ' ' 4,11:4.11'-`;'',11., ' .71:4,....,„„ 44,,,-.7,,,.,
T
1A Y +� + N. ~ r+ila7 A
.,:-., ;,,,• - • .
.. ..• ../..,...,
„„. .:.
'!qa4 ,(
„..,.,
�".."RM'� .a .: '4.1..: 1' ,{ .. ,.¢ al
�!g;. 'b yo- r�Y :
. ,. , „. a .4 -
• 't
ant
o \ , _
w, q+
.w
~ a. •,.,..AAM,w.. r -4,,,,,,,,(0,40•0/:474,:-_ �.14 ~ <4ilt."' . *".-- fs
• ` , --: � s
,,,.•._w,,wry,,.. S 30
µ
,,- ,„,..,,,,,..-.. • . ri t„,,_:,,,,-,:.
vis,r , x li
1.� ,. .
`•`a~ �r •r ~ rd `•Gi r �.31Cf5
A �1
•
�t
'} � [ 530.'9~ '."� •�5
I* • °' g 4''\ ;; ."r`"«�,,•, , '" 63.1 A.C.
„t'
7,14,„'.4,4 ' 1i� ►='./`'�'.~ �„� s�r j t 18.4 A.C. `" 85 1
).."111,
""14, ' , l•
• w + ~� ,`` , `' u II l< 530 8 5,0. "' ,,
.. ; 33,0_AC,
.,"3.-,I ,i f‘ . , I I --,-1, p:- • ti 1• ' t
Y
A it �'�y�°" Ca o-}+r [ rY, #.� �A —„ -hg--- .
.' r'� 530 4; ` i '*y rKw�� • • 306 ` i
e � „ { a 1 • f •,... ' 4 3t�_A(‘‘.--
....„...,,,:i-, vi:,..';:.:-.-.
2s,..3.
t 7 AC Ii a”, �I
iCt
<$ "«` ".�1 b w `'. 530 5` ;3 rs 530.0, ,, a� i
� i
"' .`# ',,,,,,,,4„,.,,,` f.' .I�.x t 30.4_AC �zt,o • -•s '
dYs '"+i,a iw "_.,.L,1' -, .y �•^W is• +�•,;
:- \ %
,f.--,,,,
•
�M., "' � 48.7 AC f-:.
IS30.Q ,� ,clit �,
r r, •k+T •• ,„. _"- A' "".. 25.3 qC _ 1.4. -
„v6„,,,...4
> y` �.-'t• ' z ,'� 'r"• ;.i- �11_)'i xir}-
( lit
i 'rte „?.!::',,,-• 3 4 , ii, 4-- ,y� v :. i
:r.
"''''."17,
♦varad )”1# r dJ'y�"'wa rFS. ,+ 4a .*r,
• "IRp "`w1,,,!.:1.4..:,, 7«,r,... {}� ' a ".,. , e - t I.I.
' ;:i f t•'
}y �.d. - ',,,,i4 i��r.`:����l�r;�•j:)/i% i 22Frs T2,S ( » ,,{.
Y4-,4,,,,,„„t,
,-,.'„7";',. M° ',..,'•,
,� '. r ya N�� y'+r., � +} " �. . Y r c..sV a y+r�'
..; _ , ...„......,„.
(�{ ~ �C
.,:,
,..,,_
. .
el
° ';';',11'; '"t••:i......7 �i. ', '' .. ,� �,' JEC "
rpa
, f
L ,� ,',.4...1%". , { ', i.: = _ s`'_' . :OUNDARY . .:.. r;'°.
t
� ^. ,t,':.4.24,1! L,.
1.
r.
•` '4,11:S.,
�` •'�` w
�7 # +v
:.-,,,r4-*-:-.49rii- "...t:',...*i';-4'...,r,,,/,:....f.2.
" '.1.' � t+�f�t ....y yt • . • ��t� !. ���.,' �t_�- •ir�9�� 1; 3', d+
if
�' 1 w a .
#� rpt s (•4`
4::4•
�l J 'a , J r
�5" "' ' ; .;X `r ,•i,...,....,..1.,•7,,.: 5./11 "`'
�° ; !z�....*4,_x •"�'+fir M?• 444:::.4r...4,•p:','; vp",),•A''''X'. I!' , •' ��• ,� / µ� " �,�,
,'..r.'
.f" & j�«"rL� M :Yicy• a ':,? >".r .. • «�j ~ *- - Ow
4 i-
--, -.
A' *;. ;ILS V',.4 {41 +. ,'.�1 4 .,
,, �(.. .`` •.�d .'i•. -'1r��
.,
. , ,
7
' 4s1,,,iyi .,-\ .•4?'441,,4- .-
'', .c%14"; .gi;. ps - -:-.. .,-,-„'....!,, .,, , c,:,;:**-,' ...,-.: --.' .—
NOTeE:As will be demonstrated
happlication for a
Conditional
pliLetter of Map EXHIBIT P
revision(CLOMR),the
development of this property OFFSITE WATERSHEDS
=/ =::cs
. ROON EY RANCH AREA Z
1"=1200'
( A 76.5-Acre Portion of Area A)
The — F----A
0 P-N
W LB D 1 1.18.2003
Groupe rjt PHOTO DATE: 1998(2003 IN SOUTH) Illy
WLB No. 181057-N-00
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
TENTATIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
(24" X 36")
i,
111
1
I
I
I
...
I
1 APPENDIX B
TENTATIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
- (11" X 17")
' U
3 II
I r
ie.
3 I
I 11
3 3
-..
' a
l'
1
•-1 1C�T2 0- <S rnn= Nf N-+y-1a2SNSA 000 N ro mA roZ ro- roro-+r m 7, , N , -,3›:" -± rn A rorow
�' O A D c0r0_ xm OmT• z' zm� A• ,-0.9--, A�mOr O < � aQ x O OT. o n D
MX rn m Orn �lxmro-rolnO-AO• !FI;
yy AAx. rn m Sr- 2 A m AD' O
'2[3-3,D
ro D� D Z Gl N ~ ZDD Z T A< Oq na0 00n'�n x� 1n TF).P.> �, O nZ _^ 00_1
C O p A A m Zp P PPORM;g ro<�2 O O to °r mn D ro<AN(l 2 (--j,-!VX
X D Tim ti fll
[� O Oa �n /� OZ�nrnD1Ti,-1�, O roZ cZ� mTD mr x r _°2(4=-1 Clrn � ZO= � ro0A ro c_ OS A ro x G)
Pg
y0� Gl� a -i�N nA0gm=xr<"p m� AOAn rn^�D NSU A"' rnm(lH Omb f mrn�Y DNOnpmmZ A g ^'ON�N^� D 0 Ay(n D�<r Z m O T�`n 0 fll
Z 0 ➢ Z A O 2 m x D„ 17 9 Z n p-,1 N A r. ...,O q N m Y Z O n,8 C 1n
3 p�nc � err vnzA D roro o0 Oz O A -^ rnAT -1On c gz cm A ,153)_ Azz D m D
�-1 � D .(.-,))- '7'
m O-1 n;+m0 mA- �,rnX(l (n A A � ror A� mD A D U m 1n
m� ym 8 OD �AO 0�Nzz N Dr-O O aZD Z� �mNG) `L<yn Z�A20 'v On Z n =�Qn � ^ �y x�cG1 X_ Dam D
<rn Z Om �0 D Z OO Z ONO_ Mg
i mf O1n D mcn� Oq AmxAArni m y D m C AD�zr O-' roN HOp ZO=3DAmn=troy OS"� mOO rrnArn <SOro yYro<in=AnDD � A�ma(1Z � Z Zm �ZDm Z� D �x(1 ,T rD� �n A O-rm�_ Orn AO mD py Ap ';'20,
D mmN_ q -am _ _ C r m-+�fili,„)vO A _2 rnmZtAAr_04,3 �mZ PDQ A➢ (l-1nD 20, nADimo0�nn0 0 (,-'OOroO nN01mZ0GlNSZAD Z pGl Zm mXC Zy1 D m=n�00 Z m roD rn� 2Q-,3 D rn➢x 0-<1n rnm. x y OT�Ay m QNi T x � OT 0
m00 0 1n 2 -.(� mN -1 q to 1n-1- 0D X Z ^� .-1pDA ...� O0 O 1.,A 3� C()� (l Zb Gl O Og Nm n2=� mg �Zm -'r A"'Or 1n-+,nZ _Cr^A-< O• m A2- Oz ro Z Crn v��_ Zc cn �0ro - �
n n rnq gm mm !E.64NTJ,TJ,
Sr"mHP OA Xv,O NA O^ SZA O� 'jDn NX in niM O A0 Ax ' -' 42rn '_0-� '�'O Z1n Om0mo Qa f)m Dm-+ n0 CrTrDA v '= 0rnA = m3D =gymmAxOA Z�rnZ Dm� Dr 1n (lromm m0ym G1A O < in0 (n��ZTDZ 'b O- "rD N “-'11
T iDOAO-� OCl 0c � mp0 Cv,m v, 17C� ro -•➢m~ m0, xO3r"DNrnOAD2 OXDG_1 00 n \pm Z' .mroOZ0 “Dm11 R°OAO t' AD-mroi O2 mOmZm=-1 O m Orn 02=X DA N ODn ro
A�N �,r �n m pArC 2A Z A 8.... Q O Q
-O-10Q= m0 mZ Ps
D 1n�N6=-aZ AOP D 0E Z 0? 1Q0 00 W y I it A nm 0°o0-' rnr 0 QW D iS 0 mm mm Z O n C
Dmr<nO Om ZO OZH 2v,ZOy Aprnro�Z g y to mrmr�0 AZ D rn0y n C)0 A g�rocClg 2 xy C D mrnZv,ti � ZA O,nZ N0 0 ].Z A
DOm0 Zv, nZ Nis rnZ�y2ymmQO�m DmmN <D OO= 0 O�� g°mC) mOnAZ Oi �_S rn C'�1`OrnO; O m D m N-='O- Nm Z�m "<
-(ZZZ 2 Om IT'
��+DDZ S�ZAOm--� v1 ✓, gra
.➢UAB^ 0 ���2 A,.y 1n� u,D x�'n C �'(gym rCi,Q ��-< D (TO o.�x� Z (,� � Q
N n-'0 m 0 ''.g
rte;< r;N°i°M,M5
- 611: m O D O� ,3I mx' rox 0 XrrT5 q a 21 rr� _ -+ y moV m Z Q T mZ0n m O ro (� Nm ZA-m < Gl�M
{O D Z � jma QS3-Zi AZO rD„rn� �^'r grnZA y Jm02 N �rNN(�m � m 1n0 mmOa GlCSmr✓ A ,
rn O m m Z O <O_ A `�<A 2Ov,� rn` Z �Z n0-i< rn Og-cm �mSAD�Dm m T -nC•*1 C Z rny0 1�Aro NT� xxmG1 a m N ro mr0o0Z� (lm-< �n rA�O_rn �0 J�D A -r r" �l y C DCl < 0 m-1m Z � Z
Z Og � 'v-a2ZDOrZ CSD xvmiCD mD f)Z.n.1 DC --rXC ZCr0' ZQmCA rn ro�r (-30CA�A � 0 �v, �2� � N rn3m-, o-c QA ax0 o�aGlO z � z� <z A�_ n' � (,lmorrn., z Ag1- zQQ � Y �3 �m m y DO m A-Z1.~iA Ri Z m OTO P2 O Z m 2 -r 1n0 0 <m roZ9i•) q oA ',14,
00 ,g F ~jvgi
!tip
ti_ Z � O N Z .D�O m D cxn r.�, AC D q� mZ N �� OmDOOCI n� O Z OA
f1 p T; -a Z O m-� D S D �l 6 m v (l N Gl A P -i 0 D D D i p ((Ann-CEA �1 g= y A O D �ci,O 0�<O A �' 01� m m m 0 �'N_'a v'
��] Drn a< Ob Z Z AAr3Dti N Z Z O 1nA 0C �2Z y .Z„Nv,A�- D p ro mA c N �r� � O oA u!
Is'.� Ory O➢� D� m0 rti O rn v,m O_ �� "< ro ~ m yr Z m 1n 6lrn
rei
N< rnAmZADDOO�m�Zcy AOz . 0= D�A rro�,-. _� O=G1� 'Z<"rD" nzn,ZGl-1NN�u, rq =TZ O N my� iOD q O ZDN Om0Ort' z Z ar0 O cs x Gl 4 S.xxp O0 DZy1Gl O nrnA (l2 ro �N O m DQmmDA(1a (1m OZ =O �`-'w'drn _� mmin x -< A< v00 Cv,m mm f Qn� rnA: Cm Tm Z m TCZ` DDA O O ` `^p6 C N n yr XZ �q 0 D y O ro_U C < � Z O DAiia ON < a0 DD ZS0DZ O� �D m�m �D Ng rnr 'nN A��C nZnO1., y�3 (J n' -a rnD OZ N A 2
2� '-'!7. O n 2 0'- b0 ern
e r m0 � AO (lAZ O� ro1ncA OZrU nmxc Z ro m� S A-1� n "roO g -. O �pmrD-Z A� twjm ONS � � �OA m
a.i4 IXQ= ya m,0 0-V- ;=OA`-'ooro (5,X, rXTm8 m= m➢ En IW y -O, . m�T 1'r4tf,J DY Z�= y ;o,O
�oo� ] to q ro AmZ TanD m��OAr„A A�-< D S D 2 Ay n C A„T m ro 1
-fa ] W4 A Cn r�, S Zrn D<C O m^�rw10 al (, rn hi c CA- p WD m <nx� OOr ZTo �'^ 'mi a nN' `W
CO Ocn Z� CD m� (l<AA���O� Z(7 c+ rxO NOD Z0 �-Nc n�OZ� m^� Zrn mQn =n0 zr., ("61
Z xAm pro O pA0
mho•8c mzn 0 >2 A°'--r OzI2A�Oro o_T� oz0 g�0 q O Oz OO'=' _�O-"° r1r ypmp ,g
n,Z2gn Oo Qz0 Oro , ,,y>
m� �d2 n�C O '-N S2� rOpO�Om„1' z610 2f� ODti T 2 "'Fi r<�yrt� TOOOS rnq Dy N��1'�� a� � v+ U �rzi<IUAAS0 ZUro0T"'mOv°, (�� c0,A, mro0xm 0�� 20D'-` MAI _� Am „A_'Z ;am ,iO p ^' DZ28�< m S A AxmN. SnA Z�O Z, Z(7v, a �mmDCmr�xmOrTr-1 ro-1n D ro mr^ q--rZ -r2< m _y N1n2f� m - y Z O Zpin Il '-.9,-,
CO ; x <ei Zo��pQQgOAzom Axel znA N < O PIA
Nxf10 2D-1Q< L1 xo<.,oA Oo wN' e r v O
'-Z Z n � X20 ONDOm n"jm DO A pmt mp � N mO 2 HNro �rnmA r" 4DO D��mm tiO 'oj r � � Ami
O (l n '„130 0 n(l Oro O 0 0 D , A• 11, Z-gvD 2 D m 0
N� � T F� �ZnNar_Tmroa� m00 5119 Z ��p DOr-D jm T.
Trr- OOZ�A mlron Nr mA Z A<
OiH
� O D= C)�m22r'�m��y CD �Z< 0 1n 7_ -r Oma. mr��m Aro�px ro O �Z1n�p C 2mv� 0 (.� F-;:,>--
.......
-< Om C 0DQAAO(� y� �m roQ 2 N A w v, D r- n1 D . , �2�0 mr" 0r
Zyr � DrNm-r,mA➢nxDZAA ro`n a
g�D rnD�Z HP'
y vDm A g•+, p Ow°- rT�,D O Z O�� u,0 � Zmy�A mmmAmgnDArZv,mZit'^1n . j0 �f�o� ()n Z�m � Oii
EE mxN q m OZmONyro00OCTOpA „D/„ -1mTZv,= Q r�r n ; a 5 *3 AD n m0 1mi 1MO9H O rn 8P m m0 =Z 0 m O m N N i y m O S
O .�
O
co
O
z
N D
e ` z
--ii \- .- Y Y '<`--
0
- :! O :Y c I i i O 1 8 8 11 M� (\\ / ("D ■ 0
, (,)-, 4 ' \ I:. A:1 —1 -
gA
O
<
•V 0N- o ^A4 0
7..--...1
.OT rN`' 2OOXOD HfXa 7 L_ / I 0T -, 6 m f ,11 rgz '^� snOOGZ OOGO0 1j%,
:( (o O Ornm orj p p pp ,prn rn rn00 D JJ J y• mp Z Zp__,mmr rn _D O Drl A0D
4
6 6'
ooz Doo C9 _g Z ' r; 1 r,_
161
H
IDO
i 'r 1, r C /V tri a �1n
'-7 I -‹
I '
i\\\ :,. i 1
13
2L 4C
�.p 0
0
D )> -.t1
D 0
9 Z
�� Q m 0)
uD
`
W O n Q "�s
`-O
?'Q k 1
e,9- < n OEy — O O- DE F T
ZT 4 S 2 ,I z- csI ACD' (9;21,CC5 O N Pi00 `C p C Q Q�Orn�O ��„QmNQ� �n �m �� � o
. o < 0 = OD o n-.?pw(i Q�0�2O-0 OO �`
Q Qof
a
0 ADW. ti Wo%a cn ”Z f _� Z FIRST AVE
N � y � .Zl(�OON��r- `WOE- W� O =c=:"
(D Zs- O�o000 y QQoo p-0 n O sa �= i .�:.
c„z (1) Cn Ka a Q as Z i Q O Z rn Q O l 1 z
•«• N Q ^ N r- utQ .Z fl v D� GJ D z D O � � r57
(� o OO rn cQ .� c m -: Q < �'o
,6)(9 p (- V p D m cn y rh ir4)0 p r__aw 0 C
W to O V7 O Q rnpi; 4 D Q D Q� - # `ias O co
n 'a 0
ti Q (D O
O
m w
-+ D
00 Q M -'
-' O
Q
TI
v
L 118105APareel A1CDO PulnerslRevised TOP1Rooney A TDP_Sheet 1 CDO.dwg Plotted:Nov.18.2003
0*4
'2 W(D D\\\,,,II IAC
NO0_o D n
� 0 Fzi 7,> M > -5=•
DZN-1 DON> zD
rn(��0 c' Z, N
ZI y � rn II04 '
m,
mo�83 4: N
,.
,a,g.:
N.
---- — 191i
iill --..,. 111,_.„
..,. .
-.,,,, ......_
_ __Ii. .--. .. -,.--_________......,___, \‘,...-_, „..„_ __ _ _ ANIS--I
I° -11
10.
- . , ___— NORTH FIRST AVENUE (R.O.W. �,
—�►� x �•:� VARIES FROM 175'TO 200') = S 00013102'W���r
r��. / `� "v��'—._ _ - - - - - -6 171 74'
DIi ,� o �S 001302 Wr--- -' wm_-.el- `
_� ' -+ s.349.46' tom'!_=�'..,,,-/'`,2-::::
- - --*,,, %*,. I\ R co:T;
li------,; \-- 4,...41--/-- ________-,-)-•,.,.
_,ji,,,,,,,,,1 ••\,./..--- „,,7,,,. -____.,, (---_,.....--„,••• (-).-,,....,,,,-;--_-.
.. .. 7 zitrk (--„,------ --___----_,._-_____--//ii-a,. .,,,--,.,.*...,,,-, " , , „J._,:---,-,-,---:_...
\ ..'-: .------4\-- NT,.-,-, \ ", ,1111tre• VP ') ,--:::1‘\j _/' ,---- --.1_,._:•Z .:-%.--:',%
_.
N0. �#,l �,.r., / �, \10-, S o,� ice•0107
1,21,0ip,(04. -,,-.7,- r•- --:— ,, , )7( c_i ,
�\�
,. __...,_:,,.
o.-,4
��. • -
�� ii �' I, ` ,I / x 1 4--7-
co
0. OOH, - �� \ ,.. (4,,,,..,,,,,--„,___,_ .
�� - (
( ,... _,...:. 1i, t tr::t C • t1 OP))), . XI y. / 0
',-')cl)
41 .
n . i( \I-___=,-----7)? ....._/.
mc),' •k. ro,, J,3_,/,o ♦ /'*O•., t ,--'=_-,›,,, ,t7D
-------;:--,..---
t z ' i / O x
mi„k„A ,- , .., .. . i 0)( 4, )1,:, u)2,• , ,„ 1()z . s..\.,--,--_,— , .
' ..iss\! 4iiik 0- ,`,`-s'
A 7-?-,--,ftrt ,,,,k .4
o N.. p i Z :U C,s -1M SCJI D •
T�•.. i.,, �' /'• I n. \ I��• D 11 I !' "'4D m �� /// ,xv:f yyyC'� ( Jam.....�-; �—Zi _`` ��\ o��ro v �/ /D���'• � `..�,,,,�,rrD- (n % � 1.2 /, Q rn J (�--�
� .�<-4- ,. *-P7' V., =O• -- ---V -1.,..-_<,D"-�. lam'
��\\ r'.,*.'...�.„\,,,,� ��oo d � �• � z'�•--L.?,RI O �-I O 7:,51_,,____-_;_>___,---- \_A_-_:.____ , r-%p.n.s '
\-1 \\'if F,111,• \.> II" 1111111iiiriri 7WArk At,'1'2
;�- C -�....______....._____-__::,:l rth,:_ `
, , \\",...,- r
z Off. :— •. - o •,.. • o `�-
- 7,77----'"- \ .. ',..',-,''\' 'k„• • _):. \'' L'..s. ' ".' 'WOW $Z'?.
`-'‘-,---i---'---- -- .17-7Z% - '0'.; ''• ' . '4''''‘./ rr•t'l''.,, fi (1 L
V! - \: 'lb N Cv '� --:-7.t..(- --igi, -8; rej, ''' '2/ 5.1
to o ' "!t��1�`���ii HI I \`\� ,/ N_` -.. :•/ T:,.._,- i7,,:-),-,; / • `.iiiip - ) Z
rn,'.L--,5,..
�0 \\�\\\�\\\``\��t.'` / -'4:-. ..-,-----i--- -,----�- �, .? ... . .., ►d_, /,'3,..,-.
,'" �/ ...., `i,) j Ir(
4:7/7As.-<-;,...-- ---_-,--A.___ --.1,\'',V,,-.1 •Z•:•'-'-‘.-7-- ---''''11117-el .-- •...- ,d'i .1-"i'l 0,C•'.--.1'4,'.'‘Aj ./.-ii,„y: — i-, ="3 ' . i I
_--,;__,'.—""---i-L-;77:-HiTg...--7-_7 2),-,/,,,1 ..,.,,, -,:. nr___,____._,______________
.,,,,---,., .- ?.
,,--__ ___„_._...._.,
. .
1,,,co
--,L.>_ - _ft- .*..,.._:.-.__--,_::...-_.71_--„,c, --,--.------- ,____.,g.... ___,-Lp----' r, :
%..t-4 ,.-=:,,,__-,-_---ik-Gy;--- r .a. 7,----=-----::: 2 ---,-,_ •-•••kb,--(-7n-- --_:',--4--- ,' - ..., ,'-- ---0,;\, ..7:A/s,7------- , j,.!
--•-- 4, ..\. --- ,.---,--- ,..., ,-, ,... 'SiTiletie.,'N,,I( ''..p. C.-__----=:.., '.-.\.'' --.-•-l'-'-'-'4,-,:,•,.'', ', '
,,,==.77-7;:• '--,.--(1)ok- -.:.-_.7._••.---7:-_,, ,_ ,T,-,-,-,..,,*:'•ANk g . \ 7-P,--C.--------",__,-, '‘ ,iff---- \\\ ,---/ :
.-._- ---.:-.2-,7.-, 4- 70, k.:;:,,,, ;- ..z t-W,.1 '.7,—-.___,A ,,,, .,.. .\,,,, \.,,, 4.‘) (,. -_.--- ----`r-----(,).. - ),,,__ \\ .
"AL...ri , ,,
,-...._-----'--'-----,---:--''--,'-- : ::-•-------:-_--' a -_ - " ;1'.11,` (A ,,.*--,
� ,`;Q i• ,im.\\...:•\rr,• , i ., O\ C J (Goy ��-\
, .,,I__,_,L,...„______ ___ 07
____, r, \, _,, \,--\-,
r.1,1,. ..„.„------; .,, ..,_.:_._ -,-------->c.z.,f_
1461, r7,.(\/(2„.,,,,. .,\,,t,
__ _,,:_____,T._„:„.:__________±...._,__.):_,A) ..iic3._:.r,\._,\:„,,_::_,,----,,,, ,,,\ \,,\,
,:o.g 2" ›'
NNW -i-
-
O 00� �ro /• \ Z' l(�,,„,Ik,Th: . , eici„.....,,� 4/1-768/ r
46\\.C„\ V-toc2 70„,.\,s„,.__23` / //O/ `o �\\
OW • Q. A •'\. al ini Ito 111 `- �' �� � / ). --__--------. ------J
-- \=. .\•.‘-,
•\
, , .
„ „
„,.,,..1, , .,,„ ,
„ .,,,„_,.:,
•
(‘'Lc'
"1\x/`'.,_..-...—_,.'j.,1._. ;,c,7
„,,„_0 g
Q ��, Ai't'-41--- ---.....N.§ -'14'o '- / 1 '• :--'-CCV'1'-''''P.-'14-'-'- ^i1 00/1"/ r -. Z *".”" \V����\T__F*,:,= .1'-'s\--;H—,t-----------,--
1 I 1.l� `.1Cfl'' \ r-i t Z D m�\ fj
(p 3• V�._ 10 \ i Z�\
o0 fa 23 n —F3_ � '8c. ( I°, /t, , , .N, , ...#_.!; ��� .;fir/,:\ i ,/a,;., it;).D �\. �,,
� t
,,
� � -�_m \ '�,'-•�� �'I/%��- J 1�P�� ,-- 1'R_ 4211
Vl�zP096`.#j ,�it 40,171� .A 6 -12_,__________,,___-j-----:::::__.2.p/���i '/
c7; ^a\,.. �'•,\ iO .1 71 -4S/ l'�1, '� / r_ - _ ,
--\)Z o oa. t � �- .� 6-Vir _.�o., \( .. roe.• - ..---.7.=ND\.,�' td,DD � „ ,�O 1./- i •. V **• ' •\ \Z �a'� 4- `:111...Z�;i-->___� -.,
,p O v ,o V pi, • ' 00 •, '” - • \�\, y' x_ -,'-..72-'-:_---7. -_-=------'----------
o
j)..--
0
/ ice"-%=
0 3 `< P` Q 1 to �b to l• rn I C `,' t �`��_
0 3 n ��,a�•_•.a ro
I3-___ -'-'� iv ,.''' two) .b� I ,71 _,,
oSi, \t 1 co� ////'�,,,
7 ,,,\•< ,o},3, \ i,,.-4
„.:2 T,V. t 03 \! ''I NI.,,,s \,‘Ci), k(k( ( (,,,3_,;
Q: , `..4 M,, . ._2(... ._t._.. .. / ..—4-..—ii--.;) -c.,,., i i i/" i ' -\,...) ..,:: 4. • \ , \\_•---:.,-N. Z.,-•-•. .4;•\.'\,
6 ),"" M Cl.../ : 1-r.:11 8:,___..'.. i 3,:, ..,4 ., I,3,.---7,-,.,-__-: ,\\\\\,, ,,:
, - --- -0---...--,.-4'.!NN i -,7.1 .., -, i blifferaim• .:4 ' s',...A' sk.,,,/„.J., . \ ,
__ __,_ __, ..(..., 7.3Z 0 0 :. 8:i-\'; ' \' ,,t;:C.,3 •• • I,,,, 4, ...., i ., ( i ,,,, k : . ,a20) . .• , \.:-.., ,,,.-...-• \,,--•
� ,.,
_ aS. ro-. ..r.„ ._.. ...„......i
: !77" �_ _:___:„_ ,,„„., / 0 .\�,\
Q Dt.3 B _/ l v • (g.,,,,,
N t I m p 1 " r / / •-0_-��`tea•�!: ,��i01 p ��� \�O �. X• Z1 wro -� .lr1J� ro � r'D COQ� / !C2--------------- -----:4,._,--.�- \�T C .0 (r,, n,v 1 „., �\1` b.-,. / •; , ,1'•,�'7' . r 7 W -\\�_ •----,7%,- %psi'”,/O'
\' cep SEE SHEET 3- O_� .:'�;`;` ;
1,810571Pa/col A,COO Partners,Revtsed TDP1Rooney A TOP Sheets 2.6 Cljadrp Plotted:Nov.10,2003
____0___`_-_~TDP_~~243COO.Avg ~~Nov.18.2003
.--
,
H>,--,-,
,
m
73 z
c-0
qtivi
il Ili
n 2
q
z,
•,m,1,1
m ).< _ •-k
'30,1,
. . >
,
immome... •
,4,410,..•
<0 0>
• :mu,00, .v..„,_ _ ,,,,s,.,:,,,..:&:,,:.„,
,• _- .--:0
• 0-„
73 Z
0 1
2 6 2\2 ri• '‘i6)\. •. .\\•• . •
/,.,' ,. :::,...,, ...„.0.040111(,,,,,,,,,,...'..--_-„.7.,../..„.:(2;\o. ........:Vt4'/,•?,.. ...,=___•,-Z,,,..2,‘‘,...,
<Z>,m • \ I \\X • • 77.. •'' ;'1, • ''''-'''-','"''' ' C.' •091.\;;ItT!di 1)4/:/r,,,,,-----,.=N :
C) P 7, • \ \.\\. . . c ./..7,,,,7 'J' ',.-.,-''':',. ..rs ,,, c,-1.,-rik,,,,\zi,,Aitil,y, w(T----.7-sz.
0
n
'-_,0 1>r._,17 • \\\, • \*.,„,,JoK.,.._..._.,4 ' ,0,09).=.-__,:—.. -ty---cp\----, _._ \ ,,,.,41,..4;,,,,.: -,LN,;',...1::,F.4-„N = ,s.„'m.
n 0 0 5;> . ti ,e\ 4,,:.,12,---,...,___ "xt.,,i,-•-,,,->u,,_,--- ,10.,.----.--.- \\,N,.,;,,,,,K.,N.. ,.-•,„,,,,,,,v•I• ‘\\!.,, s-.,=
,
4 z m
c1:11 m, 0 \ s,, ,4`,' •;-:;••7:,•,;',,--'--r-(\%,'"- ---73-='-----,-•--= :),',11.01/i'1,11 If° ,'Xiiiii,,///' i• .-
X,>
' \ '4#,,, i',"''''''- ---,.' -•-•.7>'''.....'. --'>•''";_.. .. ',/,'.•:•••••P,'•,•'nil,',/-. ( .. .
rn
()1'). ,Z r_. '''`X I yNk; ",.',.: -% t,-,>./ . .....,.:(n c,,,,--,---- ----,--'•:1•111',/gNir-ii,'A'''''' ,
>o •
/\ r'',//40.
c`').' °T . . • ,,/ •_,-,4\- "::nsi,,,:r,v-...,,,-• ,qc.c.„,i/).11$tiP.F74=-7,..7,<,cri.„---- ---..- ,-_,..,0;,ptilm'±‘,..,-,;g„..-,-- ,
. •---
/ \ • ./- -b?) \?,\.-,--?;49?-„-.14,0A.474 ...,..-.7_,..,.-_.-;__LL. \'\.)1',.1N,\ .'', ,,_,S..„:,-;- .'s,.•,.,.:.3/4..3.. ,re,_'I„,././.;:/),P-'7;-------Z:---:;---'.r-.a--_-- ,,,
— c,..." \k` c,-&- -.,,,-;- '-'-'4''.;NA.4,•Pt I/iz). / \•:`,'"y•:t'._\`,,,,-,_,,; •,.,_:.-ZZ-',.•,!*_.,-,._,:.-,i--_,,-_,,,`.;.-g%.,-7F---.A..:7-!----,:. -2:: .--_-,, '
. -,.. ,/,----‘ ,...„_ .....,,,,-,;,74- ,..,---------.• 1 .1 If'0, .,3 .. '\,,, ,-,"7....7- ,,4-1..,,,,,„:„.•-•, ----...-.:;---...0'.../7*,...7.7.11, II
• / '(--.)),' 41 = ,•4/:*' 9..* (.‘ . ,, I ;i 0,1‘.) /i., \...,s- --",...,..7,,,::',Iik,....,.‘"`,`......,,,,._,,,,_,.._— _.,-..:•.__•••••: •_....••••\ ,,>i,, ‘,.,tii.
. 7,,:',/.4.' ,..1 \---1,7.•:;;;•'.![:,'''7 ... ,!i:/ ..0 It. I 'ce \s'...\\-, ••••.,:::,:,:•••:,..-,.•-•.,•\''''',64;::•••, -,• -•••_•:---11 i(12,11 i;VI!,t
• :"... V-) 'XC\ •,e>',.,‘.'';''''''Ti\.— .:) .0'! A , ( i !v 4.,d) \ : -,,,-...7,, , ....- - . -- --\ fp, !f•
k \''-'•Of'.----'s , ' • 11 r('
77' .., .. ,,/,',"-..'>.0-'• , ) / /ifr,,,,h: .....) , ,,.,,, A.'8-..'.',.-. ) ,,,A.Itti is.-----,, _. , \.\.3.,(,.•0
• z,' ' •0 .i'e"-r'''7 "1')/ i / 0 INV ' I.. , : '''' 1 i a. :',7,„ `,-. ..'"---7--...)'6' 1 ' `,•''',.m
. yf.,-.% •0 • '•,..•,i::::;"/,'/• /J,., i ?, i _4.. i i ':'1'1 i'IP? t'''i 1",21'.co .1-1••1'-‘‘••.,.' ''''.i;my,
,,,,..„ ,•,,,,-, .r,,..-. ,,. ,:,,,,,,--..„...,... k .
,„.7,...„../- - ,,.• ...,,,::„, :..r,-,1\._,0_,„, - ..../ , , ,... . (6-7,,___:. -,-.--.'.'_4-- ,. .
,4,1„,4,";,••• z ,,,,, ?,:/,',,A)=,\..,_.„.......0 33..._____—+Z ----- !cc.8, _ t fti.,;3-,:------:---------1;7N,,,.., ---'441%.„.. • ‘ , • 0,...-..._.::,,..-„, t.)
,,,'" ,0.) ... ..-__.. , ......,.:
.4"--'e• ./--;" Air --.---..------..'-,..-v.>,,,..••\...,,>rn rT1,,. ',:..i\,it 1/9_,..cii,..:7-_-_--,-....._..„.:_:_,--:,
',/;/------ ----------",:-.-.,:ith G),,,,,..Z.,,.:•"" > --no</ , ,..
''''''' 'S'; .--- • - -{-"--,-------:::-R.r.'-v2")‘ ).-1-
/
),[in,,:4 7----,___IN m/ , ; \;",,,thl,..•:::_.- --;",-.,,. ,,iiii...- --..--,--,-,:b•'!4•,x,',.*,... .--:'.-,--,,,. ,.,,k!,•,LA 111 7\ c•-',.-.•:-,,,•;:.
-----,........ , ••••;'' ••••.__,-...\___ ....0>
-_,..,..-,m\ , if 3.,_,.__ , . >, _. .
, ---..... "\'' :---''''------,---R'I',0 Ili •'.'-'. \"' \----- --- K.:0 ri-- \)1\ ;'---•••=------- id.f.--',7)))1`,`-'--7----------4---
_-_-.
\-----:''-'-----:--- &-, iii.4.'°, ; ,.-2'',J,.'..•:.•- z,'1.‘t0:.' '6'‘‘,!°=)1- '19, .W:.'----,•--- ---:-..--;-------- ----------,---,:!_:,::',4,/A f 1,.-7,3--z---7-,-.4:
„,,,''':\!;,,,,'„ : `,, 1---.\ -s::.;ii\::A\iti,lii,r,so.--i-N,.,---.--__'-. _'.---- ,)-?..----c.;; •I';. \''\.\•,:',;,;:.;EXV\P'. x.r?°\(,tL ,T,,r- --•,---. 1§:z..-- .2.--::.--..1..:."L__I-f41,75-'-',
1 C'' \:\'',,, \I \ 71'i":'','till01114:'- \%,-‘,:\-<''‘''''''' --.‘---'5\),._____:_:-_______,..e,•,, ",„:„„,„.„.,,,,..„ ..-,,,,),,,,,.:„.„),..„_,..,,,,_,.,,,),./..._„.„,,,„
'-''''''S'•. :s.S\\‘‘..'''''''''''', i 1 lib ill'Ilh114/11 11%'::: -;,..,„-'* --=--.=--_-_- •f'134\ ,4 .\ \,,' '.1.:;111 WOlikiiii‘i;' = -$.-. -2a,„,° •.1\4,4K/..-,,-.--01---,....___-----41
- --,,..„... t ,,,,,,;,-•.:! ,,.., .„,/,fii,,,s,b,,,,!,,,,n1rii-,-,-----•••-z-,*-,-,.„- - -,,,,,4,...N,\,1„, p 1 ".`,11111,:.•.,-.., t‘91,6'-.0=T------",,:diti\‘V it .."-:.--7::,-----.':-.-..
,,. \\.- ',\.,•,;,-.;.s., ,pi,,,/-/•,/,,'I,,' '''-• ---:-, ------\------, , A ) -,--,,,,, ,•-,1 ,- ,-.
r
\, , if‘0,/,,e//,,if/!Pi -,., '-• ',,- ,-•---=',------=-..,.. ., -... '\ 9,„ik,,N, --,-....._ ,- ,...._.-T_-_----;---.-_.:..--.,,---- .... ,,,..,,,•,,,i- ',/ ;,...A.„.:_„:.,.._
'0., ., .,,,..,',11- t,,,,i*0,,4....4:,......_...,,,, ,„.,.q.,,.,-_, --, _. .____..._------„,,,,,.x.:;•,...... .., ., :ky..„........r.---si...--,:;5\siolt„,.--. „....,::::.,:-,-....=,,,:l,*;:...,-,,f, 1-,,,,:..-
%I
>,
,, .\‘‘.\'',,,,- i--- .--:,--7-'-7-----''.%-:,,„'':-.-..''. '''.-',:;-:,,‘"k-..‘„s\ ..- .---, ..."-,:\--....._._\---._.----s -•- A ,} f le 1•,,:/--'7--•
' ••-•g., ----------.., .A4 0\ily. ------t,i.r- •.4....,k.,.- .-••=, `';',,'c3., 4 ; i- ,, ‘Ai.e\ ,. :: ... ---........ ill . „i t .......
(70,8 c ''' 2 .‘A7. '`Y 'V-V '''''.'--. --.'"---- ',Vikst''''4\I''1' 'th'-t-0 7'------., .m 0 s .‘- ' \- \:•-",1
iCi 8 .:;---, a .... ..\\57 '-'--- " ----7,- --:-,4--'‘,3'",•1\'''''';1''.:410:\- -nA!•=1 ;•-• • ;'1,---)i of-'•*,,',\-c/k,\s,-:i'---.'8;:..,-,Vi...''.,,z,'--,jir,lif ,.,:l'ss/:'`Fsii,,,./..',---*.i.
,(:)) 9 M .„ ,f, _.(1 '?'-',';,.., 1 -‘),,`,1.'•,,,,.1 dii.1.&,,.!,,gt,..\.1,i.9)0 L: >: 2 rn:1),,.,\''' \\,\-,,:\ ..„___Q.:--;1/4- ,----ky\p( .0, -.,,41.'Zi.§i.`;',/4::‘:----.1'-'
a_ %' X ,::,, 6,,.,-r-,-,--7 1 , ,!A,4, i 't.4 tk,ts_- __§,—i_,2--....,..- o ---,-,)•r--.1X8 •.\-------:•-- --1 . q,. 4,-.-,--,---.:,,,,,,;-;/.._.- --.
, - 1„.. i \'\'''?/) if/'( 0\4 I.T.,ki," -;,..-.-0i.. 0 4-- _45„,A,;07,...1;t...-..'..A. „.._:::,-lii,,,-,-,-... .1!„ -,,.,_, ,,,..\-:-_-_-_,-.....„ ,',/, • - -
-5- a- .., A) , .. t \i, ,:,' 1 ',„/ XDO.,;,,t '',--,--,..t- -t)7:1 '-'1,->6-tisivi ,ri-7-ii-,t,:*",‘`6 • - --i---„,,),.."•.,.....L',-,-,•.4•A,..,s1:-_--..-%.''''',/7 _ '-'
((-1 -3-4- M Q ! ! 1% .•/-'s•A-"•‘''''i (( \klt>°,0,...\- _,..:(31----- --71-:-jAch:VoN?:;,1,4.,pr'<is ,--i , \------,--'0d,--,:::::xz,co,:\':_....,;.,06-,/,--:,... --_
, ..
0 . , )„ n / -g -Ps - ., . ' .a . '''',:c',D,---c'FIV.;:,-- -7--___-,.. 11!. rai?......\)dir--,:::;<:"."' . \.. 'N.4;1_---\--,,,\7,j1 ,;,-. --_,._,,•N-
E3
a< '<•':' g n %-"--...:::„.;-!,__ ..-:----_„->voqifiri-. ....---,,.....-7.V.,--:, . . _....e.,=-. ,---;::: •'--..'s.-..-- .? \\G----:_''-.'.°:' a' .,'"•C•S-•
' '4' ° )1-..'kk"'"---.. .--:'-'0.1- --=',---,nm VZ•-\ 'i) \ --,-- ,/,..;- ...- ---- -1:---,.1/4-,..,- :_.:---,-.,-..---....,-,-,...---„:---,„,,
,--6- [L,_,,, , a -,. -..--„,,,--k.,...„,,,,
.--(n , 2._ Q ...... (D_!...S ".t6t, -74,,,-,...,--Fli rn-5"N„\-2,,,,....'...:2,. frs,,,4.44,,:,.,„;e;_::,„ii-,,,,.___„,,4;,.....„_1,.....c-,1 ..,••-1 ,..,..Aisk '"'"":-.._*:,...._. .---.,
a(T. R tt. a--,- :• P., .-0, 0 '-----'-st&.,',-.....:_. ' -: --:\,--.... ;-;./.,1\ f:,>---, .. R.4-r"..'-......,-/-':-'...r....'....C., I', • ..-ela (111111r -3? ...••..r'
z--.-. , :-...- (__. . ) _ri., ..., ,„,.:4144,, ,,,.....„.„,f,/,:, .. \...„..., ,,..0',..4.1...-• ,,. --; 4 r .... •la,.•• 4,--,
, ,t, a , --, / • _..... , ?,...--.g,-,,,,„ , ) .,,,i,,..
n - v (c) ,• "4 - .---,:--z z- s, , k. ,,,..„,..„.. ;•'' r'•' 4.•-•„;,11111.11,- • .. I ,•,Co_Chi.:::-,,,.. -•,..7 : ,..”.-72,
P il 9 a '''..4\\ ----::-.... ,4, --4,-•. ,- . '•\. ,,) --......_,--.. ... v)rn \,:c.., ,,„4.--,,_•:, • 0/ _.„.,!cl:.:..
ni x
\\ '--1 .. . ".\ \ -,--( n ?0,-,•'-z------, ..:,i---..--„iikA.7 ' . :' - <—
<V-:z1 •
rfi_ ,• 00 , .• . , ., c.,c
sp 0 Fp' v rt ,'......,.., ;,„ _ ------',,te''... 7,\.'.:11./'''1.\ ...I,\,- •• • h, ,..,..1.,,,,..,,,. 8.„,,-,.':-..AL/_-_-..".-,--,/,_
,. • 1, , y..,\____r..--44,4< 1 ../ ci,,:t,-,,
0. -< 1.3' o . ,--',.-',,Ls - • ,-7 -0,...../ \\ '4.. NI,. ., C"...• •r-0
---.-
7.1,iv 1 I •,., 3 (
cA) 9 n 0, 13 1 --,:.- -. , _,,,,--).,_ ,_,_,,,,,s__-a.). ----, . 1 -,,i, ..---, .•,
8 , Q 0..........,) !..1 .\„,‘_ ,;--- ,...i --C.")
° s* ' : , ,,,,,,...,.., ..\___ •co- ., 1, i•
G,
d• (11;'. .9 (D ., \t,\,,,\-,), ‘ .
-\ .! -( 'D ?-`21,\FA;<-.m- 2. . ".•••• s'' ();) '
0 1--. ' \ - • - i .2 4:-..,or .,.
-0" N \1 ,...' i .. ,..,„lc,,, -..., .C.
( ----z..! ss.N, (),.,. %V ,3,N OcIn,S2/,//..c//';;>,,. 4 ._.1.
•,.< .,-. / ' -1\u"1/i /,':'\ -• E
\ ' ''''' '-'•-•' ' '
';,',. ,.„/ \efr 1 i •
(•,-) 0 ,„!..2.,...0 s ,,, .----- ,..,., 1,.,. . , ,-T,Zon,
''' 1,,.\\\O()I-_,> '\5-4 7'n-1:1\ .z. . '''',. \'r. ..' ,-.• \\:, "c" tv.,-,-.. 7, •._-,,...-.
5' ,-..,, (1 -..,..1' ... •••• 0 ,..,\ •• r ....:.._. ..*•<,..,.../, ., . \ \ ,,,,,./,,,.., ,K. _ ,
(g.... 0 0,k i . V-(70,!'c . ,.. .. o 1._, m \ A ,•'N.• .--s,..•.--e.--a-S.N ./it '':'.qep:?,.'f-.....-,.. ,p.
m 3 .\,•' • .'s\'f e)" ,),'° i 0 0 \s's, • ''': 46,Y—,-1,..:P). :,<L-._ __\,..._ \ptcs--L.. '....,;==1:. I i.4..a°=
rT, -8i Q -\i s', 1Nk, -, , (.. ,--:,, .. '4 z . ,, ,\\ ./.,,,,._.........:-_---. • - --r--,:,,,_--;.--- ...., ---,T.-----,,,'r
,s_-_-,,,,,,,,,.,, ..,,,:,,so. ,..,.., ___\, ...:•<g\,,.. ,..fr. ..,_..,,..- ..4.:-,,•,
m
.,._.
.... .,, ,-,.•
9 ' Et- 0 ..---,),,,,,--.:,....N.-.:-...._ •,--. N.,':,... •rs‘,.,„,::::-.....---___ ......_,,,\% i-.;,,sa,., \ . ••••• <pp\ ,•• •-• V," -•
...,,, ,,,r.' "-•••,---.... .
s.„•,::, -- ... --_------.:,-....,--,-_-,_____,..,-- %> : , ,,-•. • ,-)Q.11 I. . i s' • .. . , ••• -I'N.
v C-I3 Z
SEE SHEET 5
L-‘181057,P.c.....P.....ise,DP...ney A 1•01._Shee.24....dwg Plotted.Nov.1...03
G)*J
or,
co
a
SEE SHEET 4
"GP
1)..i‘"lii?----; -• ... -- . !•••...W''..,1.: &*-61_,-,?1, •,:\r, :-----:..'';'" ,. '''.,.°.‘----•-.....;;:-/_-_, / _IL.."‘....29,-
L `�.-----0--1 rn b� . l 1`� 1 r 'I,.-U';'
.i ll.‘441::', .!,-,....... ----'-`7,.-2:::::-•-••',/,./\---,,A---41°'-'
-.•'`'41-•,•4_ ,:•
�..' �. / ,(�� av /: _ Anil"'
'✓ro../ //..)r'
Z Q \ �`(` _✓ ,, 4d"••+e-• .4 -_ '- CI' • ' t��
_{ \��4:�^+ey°,ate: ,�.i rr �'.. I Qo CO r � ( I a 'tlN,^ (,�SQI►I� / i
�8-....).- -,=,,,,-:',. ------.;--:-.i‹.•-:;,-
\ 1�: ., __ `10,. -110 .- / •, ."d.:._O. s/ O �0� -
~�.�Z Z O ti —, \ '} ;' I m I '''`.•,°p (n %r, �y P
fl lif
..,,„..,....,, ,
.,.. ,
` - .-$�
eco,--. ,11.., y; k 'z_11
':� \�� 1 N/� - \�C�v 7X_ D--I, • J ;,;4„. Z / c Iv ,C)::•. , '.•.i,}Q��,f` ,i' ' " ++
, 'i '-''''- 1
g'Ce' � ",� $\) �� _ \\�v T>' O Z—\:.-,• �',, ;\ 10 �\.. , 'k V�V //�•J•�'\—.._..�^.. C. O
$n lii �\C�." `-��` tl' { O rn.a -1
! '\
'L'ii,• r�/% • •''' I1 ; Y�1-X ._\ ,iq, w3 :" _\•'\.\. ,' `., \1,vti/'•/-o%IV . \/ •:‹i'''.
lf\`.ro�'i~ '\, �,.�'';%-'-';'-±--1 2 •1
�.�.__ --�'! W ,: \••. :�'�I '-„\ i O, f `.•\ / •00 v `i
ff
CI
• •0 . ', 1 `,7,------_,_, ,;...! ,-,z(:):i. -,. 4! ..., ,.,., •••73,;,,: ,..,:, ...,,,i,- . ' ...,..,„, •„,,,...,,,, i -±- ,,,\ • , .
1 FF _,,..^, l :1:::', .. / \ 't�\ 1, •� W, C�•
iv,
ALV ,
p •Ct\`! '`�., � �, ��-�1 '•�"7.�_Q •,•\:� •;;,G� /b / •� - ,• j �. o•ms`s•'�,.
•. v .• ` .t' Y �- --. �_ '-^_may •�''••.. _-A' •'Ip••. .. '•u. N .i ! a.m.'.M 4 I
.f•^.a � N'\•� ���\ •1!� •.�\\ ,I
�•-���:n,. �. w `c .•• •v �i. X i� /' C'ft e,_ 1•`yy1 I
•
\-----,14" ) N gi. ! \ '„ .,,---\..s---__ ___T___...„..„,,,,_.7.-§, ..\0 P. ,‘‘•',is.,, ‘:‘-:,'-' ,....7-,7.4,•:',,, -.3 1 3,1' 4.zi, ' *-:
1,3 - . "---) \\\ '',..,, 5\'', s'. • ..- -
.. ,,,
. 7-_-\\,.. 4 , .,,, /
•
,_
�,� \ 1 -.. : ,- •� •1 -' •YN 1• •. 7 ....:\\o�rn•'' j t` �f full It
a 1'
..1 " l'A t IV• ") "2
m::,.(TN ,:.,
:1,,.---,-?,...
, , ..., „... 4 ..',_......,-,,‘,15
.,-::, ./:.;
. :, . ,:.-
CO
O {/• n. ,, u j i !- `t •\,776\k, 1.\ ,;, 0�`N, :\; %a• ';,' -� /,� O �'', V ' -•f=Tl
�ZI \\` • :,'1• ```� `-14. 1 \''ti N V\I
( rn 2.\''''..\\\
Y'�\\�`�'.\y *1S\\
,! �.y •g./b /` ,•
Q �_\u \r„\,‘,......,..„...\,H',.A.,:\>;.„, „- 1 ,\ � �+ �O Z\ \\ .i L
em l -...,,,,,,,V.:..,} ` ./ ,N /'d:C� Dm��
4\
v D �'. 1•�1� . ..„`\\1'% •t �•� C l i ▪ '; tL_ h� •C/1 fTl •� \ / •
W—i\\
Z r' ? ...._,N „ \�� 'ti_ +-` O .• "Ji I 1\\. \, m X 1.' 1 D /'/.r
Di
•
--------.Z.-'1, 1? 1,._. / .,, t.. '.•>.._ ,-\•-•-, • ,,, . 'A-I '''...•' , . ; &-)`)` '''' sr-ok, `• 1%.**:,-,. ; E .•'.41 .,
‘--- --`\ •‘,, lil..,), . , -.. :,......:::;;-•;-,:-.--‘•:.- T'• ",.. 17...- -!.--"--,S\- .1 ‘--'.,m Eg:.,,,, -,,, -. ,. iii:‘ ,.,:lia.......11111111
\\1(>2.k - \ .. • - .q..„.„..,„' ',•,..;,,..,, ., a „.,..., \--., .) : .. "),,...\ \0,.. ‘,., 7)..._x, f.
, -,,\ .2\\ I..‘?. - '''..'':• V I••' '\ * \ •0 0 1, -' s \-0 00 .
t �'�,,L_ ;:N i,'C �... 1 ,,::'`� ` -kyl •`.N 1:V.,-4 ,Y),! +��,`t♦,�1\•:.. 1-'. .f\...
•I,:\:,,,,.,,! ``‘'. S?. it Az\-g ...r:.:,:':i,-.1. r:' ?..) . s-,.'N.C'q•::•;:-.5.\:, .:::::-,;i:-\ b . .)...-. .,...., ,,,,\ . .,
\';1''''\\--- •-•--\ ( *Is' '. \•-'2-2--' ) ''' 1 A i I '''...\)1 ! '‘` . .0\•:;\'' \‘, '.'.•'\f/9 O-,.'e3
4.4-\\I \ sz.,..,i,„.-, .., c,. ,-,-.--„,. ., i /Jr& i. ,\ . , ,,, \-;c., . ,..,R.,
., N.--- 1 .\ , .., \,,, A .,_\.,,,,,,,, 6 -\::, ,.., r_
.. ...r, . „. ..,\-\ \., , .1 . ,
:,..\\\, ,.. , ,...,,,, ....t . ."..i,;t7,, 1-1\,..‘A , .‘..\1\ :A... ' -... \---. ",,,,*
.3 pr,fi,A, A3 4. - \ . 1\''''''''''iiI'''..:: ' r''11.\\.
ao N O �,•'i -,..\\�••\;.,.. „`\'``\''''.-',,.....-\''-s.,'•
'-L_''.,,2. • f) P{ i'^..2 ,1 t�,•f.`' 1. W -.\
\\1 , '•
\ \\, c .C.-‘0) '\\'-'' ,>- \‘')( \ -i:\k,r1 ,..\----k:, v :1,.
3 -• ��: \_.„-,,•-,,,.:!:\\:!.:1::„,i,,:,..
` \• ti, ,�, _ .. .��1� f NUJ «, )-....,\.a
• ,,,.:• )....,:,:.::',.\..
:"....\...-1..`11,,i,,....if«.4:.;,"
,‘,.::`,..‘„,„:,:,,,:
Q c7 may, id \\ ,j,, fi \+\`\`, ,°v g\-..= j.f`t -• ,,,•,,
• VI\ \ N.. \
'1. ''''',' ,' \,! i.'`'..--....14;\ j t,Ir(--\''s'''-r.-/'3 , .::%1.L. ,--,--" ..--
X oX -n o O
o �: O
v -b
m
1.11810571P•reel A1CDO Partner•1Revieed TOP.00ney A TDP_Sheet•2.6 COO.dwp Plotted:Nov.18,2003
o�g
0a
c)
10
no
rs� v Dti �D
Z 1� °I—° �O ,„
v
liY ,...
4
y, ,., XI —I-n „.... Z.. ,,,. .:el
—,,,,:k,N Aid 1-!..i,'---, '....1' i, ', -`,) • i _____ :.—
o
z
3 .'' Vii- 8 =b. .....
.-.. Ip y t
iU J.
Q f Ili -< s, `',� ,;f I' � O< o`,- 9o, - I
O y —.�` / fZ�fl .e s I_ • ; j Z `�'a y- i O I -, 1�1 _ �-
12
• � t. J
� S r r rn F' m ='
c� . �`. r--_<D . 41
/ p
�n � ` € _ ,, gni a ; N '�4 N
a s,-) !' .A l I t' r..t ,O = h. 1 Itl €.• ' N 8 I+
i..t' f •f a ;J"f 1 O
1 rn hi : ' rn E o
I
1 O S i' Xi 4 O F4
C'it' T 1 E .-_. �.'
Z7O�, 21't 0
1• x Ci� D C
4
O 1 i, I f c> m 5
�� A e
�. zf� � Z
tii
@ {•. `-> D
V
m
a�1�=
o
NOt�D fr1
0 II� • D '� ED
IEI
m . ). 2D A-2 O J w c.+
Z NZ mC)lv D r*1 o O DZ r m N
rn a X&V 0 ,_F,',
r aJ S N x1
m it, O • • n4. ro$1.
(n ✓
I
7e'a" rnm
1 o c
z
O
ODm Ii, i- MAX.4 D Oo rD• m*' p O
\ 1N P
Vi; 0 g,),? �Sj -0 Z ? O
, D D -1 {
Z, ui
cn ==z
D' I N -1 z_
2
Or art w ai
m O=
D D
I
� om
rmpm
m '.. r O
O v Z�
m
'
O
m
Z �O
)! I
1-
o rc
D m �()
i<p11
O U lb
o • DZ <^ Iz 0rn
GZ)=a 03, - D Z7 124
ZT ,
O i+ rn vQ ..
%� rW N 5'
t,;,,,,Z
Q � g 0 S 0
bebib!illik - Z 1 I�
n (�D s, Q in' -' 4i,�tuar& D ° 'a'
_r ,'..fV
t .
O P Q O (a ^\ ,, rn i MAX.
m W
Q Q Q Q 13 m'S ° z
so O V --1 O. A n /, x u
z v 'D Z
O 9 (D D //1 O gy o-DI
Q' N (� nye ? n 0r v 53 D •_.••
0
m
(Q O D \ i 5'-0"n r
w (D 3 0 O �/—
3 o 0
U 3
O .< ' 0
(D
tee.
L.11810571Pelcel MCDO PaMers.ovised TDP1Rconey A TDP_Sheals 24 CDO.LI, Plot.:Nov.18.2003
J ................"I" ii.......,
.....„:
.co
iz .: — J 1_, E.--z :
; 0 ___)
Aik,
'W
— E z—_--
..,
: 3'
i ky_ , ,111
,
0 :
Nr. I, r,..,.-r.:( 1::
;,;•
:3-
:..., .• \\
,
. . __
--- \
.._
. _
. N116'
. i ,_,. g. iskA. •,-.. ,.1 .....
if212 " <;3 E vy ..,,k ?.,i ,,,,, . , A
q 7 Ai r,'.'-:). N war • ,
Vb
p...iip ,,,_ 1 -w V2 al a - ',,
'..t‘' . .• f.•:.i
I I.1 H1:,‘.,
• , „.. •,
,,.. . ... I, •1. .. i,
-_-_.
_
-
r
,o-
,,
-.....
E.
: : • \
E - . ,,,,,g i i- _ • . .
--t 1 1 •.,-
or,\ ,-. , . --<.•:,..„.-- of!I -,,,, z i. - 1,-- ::- .,.--, '
......;-.-;_
1,1 -7_, -•Ty, .,,,f,,,,,... \'.Z'i.: ,.p.1,. .,,, , i ',,,-,," I'3 '—'-
1110410-;'' .
A/•,•'-''''.. 11 2-
.-
/
---
C)
w 3
\ ;2::' \ .,_.._•-\?.„1W/ it"
'J?'" 0
T Zi i") 0 Pa >
.—:,,,8 —'s 5
7--,,3 ii)) 0 —I
E-.'8 -C—
'88 ' a
8 9 9 es Z . . .
Z-VA
a 6 •••1 A:1 *0 a * a* 0 0°*0
, cc,
344.* • p
.,_ 9-'4 9--,.., 6
0
0 . ,a 1, 0 1 °-T: ill D:--- (.6),8 2,(1);)) *4,, . (t\
a 9 0 =..
g 0 Z 2' gi a 5. `,'(-j;IT'
0 , ,D 0 ... ''' ]-2- q a g(2 gl -
' Z '--e- 0—
('D' cl C
0
P E5. ° 0 3.• aiiiristaw ?', g El '(7'-2 '''ol * * ° * *0*0 °
m
,',' .,0a iti,, 8 III- wo
cc; il fill ev .
-g- `,-,1 II 12, -23,2. * #0' ‘ * Qit 0•
a •/` J"
,000"
(.0 0 g
,
a
rir, 0 0 0
, 9
APPENDIX C
TENTATIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
(SINGLE SHEET)
24" X 36"
•
4+ i
I
i
APPENDIX D
CFPO SURVEYS
i
i
4i
t
S
i
i
i
1•
i
t
-
itti(( '.
C.
t
I
1
.
Cop
2003 CACTUS FERRU6IA10115
PY6A4Y-OWL
T
Subject Property:
Parcels 'A " ,F c 7" located in the vicinity of N.
first Avenue and Lambert Lane in Oro Valley, Arizona
(TAX I.D. NO. 220-09-0160) ;
j' . ti
'.:. ..; ., i' \I ..„:1,;.,"!.4 . i-. .
. ;:i:,..t. :(. ' ;'-.1 •?..ii,-.Cg11141:'' ' '. ..
8
...,,,,,.;ii , ---„-::,...,.:., -,,.‘ ..,: ,- _ , -'
. . „....„...„ .......,.. ..- i. . ,74 '
ft
':.. ..'E-...''-::::::::s•' '-. ..:.. --A, ''......--.:-..*-', ... ‘..'1‘: . -,',.'',' -
-: -----... 4':-.:-.J.:t• ....--,J. .1,.--.1.77,.:c.-- --;1:. .3_,
a2
. _• 4.•.,:.,.'•.:...-...4 _-..,..,.-..
. , -.- :--
,. ,.. .. . . .
, .
, . i'
:...-....,. ,.. ...,-. , . ..
01998 Michael J. Terri°
MR. JAY 5. MITCHELL
CANADA DEL ORO PARTNERS
401 SOUTH BOSTON, SUITE 2400
TULSA OKLAHOMA 74103-4012
f
Prepared by Michael J. Terrio
Arizona Owl Surveys,L.L.0 .
P.Q. Box 40482 Tucson,AZ 85717
May 3, 2003
2003 Pygmy-Owl Survey Report/Parcels A, E, & F / Oro Valley, AZ
Introduction
This report addresses the cactus ferruginous pygmy-owl(Glaucidium brasilianum
cactorum) (CFPO) surveys that were conducted on the subject property during the 2003
CFPO survey season. The purpose of the surveys is to help determine if the endangered
CFPO is actively using the subject property for nesting, foraging, or other behavior.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) recommends 3 complete surveys per season,
with negative results, for a minimum of 2 consecutive breeding seasons before develop-
ing in areas where a loss or disturbance of pygmy-owl habitat may occur. The purpose of
this recommendation is to-reduce the risk of"take" of a pygmy-owl and the subsequent
liability of the landowner under Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA).1 If
pygmy-owls are detected at any time (whether before, during, or after surveys), to ensure
ESA compliance, the FWS requests that they be consulted prior to development.
Currently, survey results for this property are valid until the beginning of the next breeding
season (January 1, 2004).2 To maintain project clearance and keep the risk of"take" to a
minimum, the FWS recommends an additional 3 surveys, with negative results, before
removing or altering any remaining suitable habitat after the beginning of a new breeding
season, regardless of the number of consecutive years previous surveys may have been
conducted.3
For authorization to conduct CFPO surveys, surveyors must hold an Endangered Species
Permit marked with a CFPO survey designation. The FWS issues permits only after
applicants provide documentation demonstrating adequate field bio logy experience.
Surveys for this study were conducted under the authorization of permit #TE 8 3 9 510-1.
Study Area
The subject property (Tax 1.D. # 220-09-0160) consists of a combined approximate 89
acres located in Oro Valley approximately 400m (1/4 mi) west of Oracle Road along N.
First Avenue. The property, approximating 793m (2600 ft) in elevation, is divided into
Parcel "A" (approx. 80 acres) and Parcels "E" and "F" (approx. 9 acres). The parcels are
separated by First Avenue and Lambert Lane, with Parcel A to the east of First Ave. and
Parcels E and F to the west of First Ave. and south and north of Lambert Lane,
respectively (Fig. 1). The floodplain of the Canada del Oro (CIAO) Wash runs along the
southern boundary of Parcels A and E. The entire study area falls within the NW 1/4 of
Section 7, T12S, R14E, of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Pima County,
Arizona.
A"take", as defined under Section 9 of the ESA, is any action resulting in the harming, harassing,
injuring, or killing of a listed species.
2 The FWS is considering delaying the beginning of the 2004 survey season until February 1. In the event
that this does occur,results for surveys conducted thus far will be valid through January 31,2004.
3 Because CFPOs may move into previously unoccupied habitat at any time,the FWS recommends
additional surveys after a new breeding season begins(in areas where suitable habitat is yet to be cleared).
ARIZONA OWL SURVEYS, LLC
Michael J. Terrio P.O. Box 40482 Tucson, AZ 85717
(520) 319-9127(phone 4 fax) miterrioeaol.com
2003 Pygmy-Owl Survey Report/Parcels A, E, & F/ Oro Valley, AZ 2
Methodology
Survey procedures must follow established protocol developed by the Arizona Game and
Fish Department (AGFD) and the FWS.4 The survey procedure involves broadcasting
the taped territorial call of a male CFPO at designated time and space intervals on, and
sometimes around, the subject property. Because CFPOs are territorial, playing a taped
call may incite any nearby CFPOs to respond with their own call. They have been known
to respond from up to 800m(1/2 mi) away, and sometimes will approach to within a few
meters of the surveyor. After an initial 2-minute listening period after arriving at each
call-point, the surveyor plays the taped call for 30-second intervals every 60-90 seconds,
alternating between the cardinal directions, for a period of approximately 10 minutes.
This is followed by a minimum 3-minute listening period before moving on to the next
call-point (for a total of 15 minutes minimum at each call-point). Depending on the size
and layout of the property, several of these stations or "call-points" may be needed to
adequately cover a particular parcel. Call-points may be spaced up to 400m (1312 ft)
apart in rural areas, but may need to be as close as 150m (450 ft) in more populated areas
where noise from traffic, barking dogs, etc., may interfere with listening for owls.
Surveys are only allowed during peak activity times of the owl, which are from 1 hour
before sunrise to 2 hours after sunrise, and from 1 hour before sunset to 1 hour after
sunset. Because data suggests that CFPOs readily call during bright, moonlit nights,
surveys can also be conducted throughout the night from 2 nights prior to 2 nights after
the official full moon whenever the moon is visible (i.e., not obscured by clouds).
Because the response rate of CFPOs to taped calls drops significantly during the non-
breeding season, surveys can only be conducted during the breeding season (January 1 —
June 30).
Additional provisions for project clearance from the FWS are that 3 complete surveys
must be conducted for each of 2 consecutive breeding seasons. Surveys must have
negative results, must he spaced at least 15 days apart during any one season, and at least
1 survey per season must fall between February 15 and April 15 (considered the "peak"
of the breeding season). All survey notes and information must be documented on
AGFD CFPO survey data forms. Copies of these forms must be submitted to the FWS
after the end of each survey season. In cases when a CFPO is actually detected, data
forms and separate detection forms and appropriate maps must be submitted to the FWS
as soon as possible after the detection(s).
The subject property was surveyed for the presence/absence of CFPOs during the 2003
survey season in accordance with the procedures described above. Eight call-points were
used, spaced approximately 200-400m(656-1312 ft) apart (Fig. 2). Six separate sessions
were required to complete the 3 surveys. Due to heavy traffic noise along First Avenue
and Lambert Lane during conventional survey hours, the provision in the survey protocol
allowing surveys to be conducted late at night under full moon conditions was taken
advantage of, thus allowing surveys near the road to be conducted when traffic flow was
4 Arizona Game and Fish Department and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2000. Cactus ferruginous
pygmy-owl survey protocol.
ARIZONA OWL SURVEYS, LLC
Michael J. Terrio P.O. Box 40482 Tucson, AZ 85717
(520) 319-9127(phoned fax) m,%terriogaol.corn
2003 Pygmy-Owl Survey Report/Parcels A, E, &F/Oro Valley, AZ 3
substantially reduced. The first survey was conducted over 2 sessions during the period
January 15-20; the second survey over 2 sessions February 15-17; and the third survey
over 2 sessions April 18-21. Specific time, weather, and call-point location data for all
survey sessions are recorded on CFPO survey data sheets. The original data sheets are
kept on file at the surveyor's office and are available for review upon request.5
Results
All CFPO survey results within the study area for the 2003 survey season were negative.
No pygmy-owls were detected on or near the subject property, either aurally or visually,
during any of the survey-sessions. Surveys conducted on the subject property during the
2000, 2001, and 2002 survey seasons were also negative.
Discussion
The FWS recommends a minimum of 2 consecutive seasons of CFPO surveys, with
negative results, before developing in areas where a loss or disturbance of owl habitat
may occur. 2003 is the fourth consecutive year in which CFPO surveys have been con-
ducted on the subject property, and the results have been consistently negative each year.
The subject property is approximately 3 miles from the closest proposed federally
designated CFPO critical habitat.6 Additionally, the property does not fall within a FWS
designated "Zone 1" area; it falls within a "Zone 2" area (although it is adjacent to a Zone
1 area). Zone 2 areas theoretically have less potential for CFPO habitation than do
"Zone 1" areas, but more potential for habitation than do "Zone 3" areas (Fig. 3).
Specific vegetation characteristics of a property are critical in determining the potential of
a site to attract CFPOs. Vegetation common in known CFPO habitat in the Tucson area
falls within the Palo Verde-Cacti-Mixed Scrub Series.8 This includes a well, structurally
defined mixture of canopy, mid-story. cacti, and shrubbery type plants. Examples of the
species that may be found include small shrubs such as triangle-leaf and white bursage
(Ambrosia spp.) in the understory, whitethorn and catclaw acacia (Acacia spp.) in the
5 1939 1/2 E. Fort Lowell(Rear),Tucson,Arizona, 85719,(520)319-9127.
6 As a result of a lawsuit filed by the Southern Arizona Homebuilders Association,et al, against the FWS,a
federal judge ruled in September 2001 to remove the designation of more than 730,000 acres in southern
Arizona(260,000 acres in Pima County) as critical habitat for the pygmy-owl(under grounds that the FWS
did not adequately study the economic impact when designating critical habitat for the owl). In Nov.2002,
the FWS submitted,along with a detailed economic analysis, a new proposed designation for critical
habitat. As of this writing,the proposed rule for critical habitat is undergoing public comment, and a final
rule is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register and become effective in late 2003 or early 2004.
As a general guidance to landowners concerning potential CFPO habitation,the FWS has divided Pima
County into"Zone 1"and"Zone 2"areas. Both zones contain suitable habitat,but the potential for CFPO
habitation,based on historical records and current knowledge of active territories, is believed to be greater
for Zone 1 than for Zone 2 (urban areas excluded;areas not Zone 1 in Pima County are automatically
classified as Zone 2).
8 Brown, D.E.(ed) 1994. Biotic Communities: Southwestern United States and Northwestern Mexico.
University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.
ARIZONA OWL SURVEYS, LLC
Michael 7. Terrio P.O. Box 40482 Tucson, AZ 85717
(520) 319-9127(phone fox) mjterrioeool.com
7
2003 Pygmy-Owl Survey Report/Parcels A, E, &F / Oro Valley, AZ 4
midstory, and palo verde (Cercidium spp.), ironwood (Olneya tesota), and mesquite
(Prosopis spp.) in the canopy layer. Saguaro (Cereus giganteus) and other cacti such as
prickly pear and cholla (Opuntia spp.) are also quite common in CFPO habitat.
Parcels E and F have a gradual south-to-north ascending slope with desert broom •
(Baccharis sarothroides) (a large, dense, green shrub) and cheeseweed (Hymenoclea
salsola) prominent throughout. The canopy structure consists of scattered and small
mesquite and palo verde. There are no mature saguaros (i.e., large enough to support nest
cavities) on the property. Whitethorn acacia (A. constricta) and desert hackberry (Celtis
pallida) comprise most of the midstory-level vegetation. Prickly pear and cholla are also
present, as are various grasses and weeds. Parcels E and F are relatively barren of the
denser-type vegetation and structure favored by CFPOs.
Parcel A has both flat and hilly terrain and has a fairly good mixture of canopy, midstory,
and understory vegetation. A few isolated mature and cavity-ridden multi-arm saguaros
{ are also present. Dominant canopy vegetation on Parcel A includes velvet mesquite (P.
velutina) and foothill palo verde (C. microphyllum), with occasional blue palo verde (C.
floridum). Desert willow (Chilopsis linearis) is also present along the wash, mixing in
with the mesquite and palo verde to form a significant "gallery forest" stretching more
than 400m. Dominant midstory vegetation on Parcel A includes whitethorn acacia,
catclaw acacia (A. greggii), desert hackberry, and desert broom. Other mid-story species
present include Mexican crucillo (Condalia spp.), graythorn(Ziziphus obtusifolia), and
four-winged saltbrush (Atriplex canescens). Cholla and prickly pear are present but
appear to be limited. Barrel cactus (Ferocactus wislizenii), pencil cholla (Cylindropuntia
spp.), hedgehog cactus (Echinocereus spp.), and pincushion cactus (Mammilaria spp.)
can also be found. Dominant shrubbery on Parcel A consists of burroweed (Haplopappus
tenuisectus), cheeseweed, and ragweed (Ambrosia spp.). Other shrub species found
include triangle-leaf bursae, desert zinnia (Zinnia acerosa), and brittlebush (Encelia
farinosa). Paper daisy (Psilostrophe cooperi), desert marigold (Baileya multiradiata),
white ratany (Krameria grayi), and various other native and non-native grasses and
weeds are also present on Parcel A. This parcel, although much more suited for CFPO
habitation than Parcels E and F, lacks the ironwood trees and strong cacti presence
(including saguaro, cholla, and prickly pear) often found in CFPO habitat. However,
with a natural wildlife corridor (i.e., the CDO Wash) bordering the parcels, it is
reasonable to assume that CFPOs may be attracted to or near the subject property.
Because CFPOs usually fly only short distances between perches, biologists speculate
that heavily vegetated washes are often used by CFPOs when they disperse or seek out
PI new territories.
Another important factor when considering CFPO habitat suitability on property is the
level of development and other human induced disturbances already present immediately
on the subject property and around its boundaries. Parcels E and F, with their relatively
small size and proximity to heavily traveled Lambert Lane and First Avenue, in addition
to being nexxt door to residential development, are already subject to various roadway and
noise disturbances that would probably preclude CFPO habitation on the property. Also,
the lack of vegetative diversity and structure on Parcels E and F is probably due to past
ARIZONA OWL SURVEYS, LLC
Michael J. Terrio P.O. Box 40482 Tucson, AZ 85717
(520) 319-9127(phone 4 fax) rn jterrioPaol.corn
,
2003 Pygmy-Owl Survey Report/Parcels A, E, &F /Oro Valley, AZ 5
disturbances on the property itself. For Parcel A, other than some unimproved dirt roads
and trails that lace through a portion of the property, it does not appear to have any
disturbances that would preclude CFPO habitation. However, moderate to heavy
- recreational use of these trails with motorized vehicles may deter CFPO habitation.
Although First Avenue borders Parcel A, the majority of the property extends well
IL beyond any disturbance that the roadway may cause.
In considering the variables mentioned above, and comparing the subject property with
known CFPO occupied territories, there appears to be moderate potential for Parcel A to
attract CFPOs. Parcels E and F do not contain the usual resources commonly found in
CFPO habitat, and the potential for CFPO habitation on Parcels E and F is poor.
Conclusion
All CFPO surveys conducted during the past 4 survey seasons on Parcels A, E, and F
yielded negative results. Although no CFPOs were detected, it is important to remember
that the surveys are not 100% conclusive, and a possibility remains that CFPOs may use
s these sites now or in the future. Survey results are valid through December 31, 2003,
meaning that additional surveys during the 2004 survey season are recommended by the
FWS if suitable habitat is to be removed or disturbed after the end of this year (see
IL footnote nos. 2 and 3).
4.
Statement of authenticity:
This report was generated by Michael J. Terrio, owner of Arizona Owl Surveys, L.L.C.
and holder of Federal Endangered Species Permit # TE839510-I and State License #
SP738741, granting him authority from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the
Arizona Game and Fish Department to survey for cactus ferruginous pygmy-owls in
southern Arizona.
/7.4,76 ( / KT _
Signature: ,4 r
Date: 41/ 3, z I
LV
[
ARIZONA OWL SURVEY5, tic
Michael 7. Terri° P.O. Box 40482 Tucson, AZ 85717
(520) 319-9127(phone A fax) mjterrio'col.corn
. ‘
Pima County
ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA
.11111111111.1 r_i___ _.,,. ,
,-, I
\ 1 ............
(i)
...... • , --I --- ----- ...„.„
- ..----'
• , . ,_
/ ....._
, . \
/
i' ,.. / \ I ----\ I-,
u) /
•\ / ]
1 ..
\ '
i
--. ... I
I l/
—. - .., „...
. it .4 .4.11. "4 a g .. ., . - 'Air-. - • ' D
!.........................................L..........,i.........r.....
:— . .
7" 1
, 'Lai
11------- ..: . • .
Z
i'''
Yr VV- '
,..-''''
\lIl
. ) 1.<
....,_... .c- / X
III
,
.
IIII 7 , r • A
a .
..,
' .
-, ' \,,, .. .
,
,„
...., ••
„ ...,,--'.‘,.:-.---
,-- c • . \\
zi\v/ • •
••
..:7? •. 1 ..,.7.',<- \.•,. ...\-L,
1 '•.
..,,
- <
' '--/ •
\ .,--..(>1-
..:.,.• • -Ir- . .. \..," ..,
)/ /.c .' '
' y'\„,
1.`41,,, ril. ..--•• \s- • \ i--------___,,-,..„
_, \• r,
.,.....-,
. / :,./ - .. • . - \\.- ,
,.... , ----- \ , \ ,K
,
.1-,
,
__I _,-
, gi .• g .
_..-
• • \ / A
fp-7,
I
- \ - \ , l -=\ ' ---'
. ,... .
\,..-
.1111111 N, , s' ....,--' ,....,
t. \ /2.... :/ s..„.i
`,.... .4*---- \-----."''
1. ,A "'- ' • .....- \ . s., \
W l '? ) .5' ,''' ' 1
/ \\, ...kik\ 2 \ e,,, ./ ,..\. ,------,,
,-- --...„L._._,----------------
\ .\. 4 -11-\' i ':,.,,- ------- ..::::,N,
\ \sV
In / \\- -- r-r--;—,-- --.. .
.,.:.
.....,
/
.•-/ \; ,-.- 111111,. -'-'''',--)-'-
.i,-<-C.---- Z .\- 4'"'< Q../ ,
./n. ,..•••..,
0 ,/ .. ,,sa16.-• ....,,, ,,,-- .
.. O ''' UV 1 ,/s\
\\ . / ,,.,.., , '.›.:...:-.
-7
,, 4 ___,.....,'/V s. trig, / .---/ -- ---''
\ . ...„,v, ... / \ .\ •-
/ assiow '
• \--y-,---,---QZ---)
-, /\ ) • / (
•. A \V• '-, i
/
, .,,,,-- r' N, AN / ./
/\ 70• 1 I
,, -----`
' ‘ ''''.
s,
,11 ?--
-- \ / ‹t-,-•/
*‘ ' ---. -1'
1 ,
111,:.1-• i (- .//N4)1,// /-. /..,,,,,..,,,;<, J.---
/.`,/,... / P-•• .
\ ., \- 7/7 < /.'. ;:\
• '''''',--!,
x. s,/x--/
, ,............„\ .,,,,. _/ \ V f's A.' 11\ A ,,
•,. , .`,.....,,,,, / • . /,,,Xs / /-1--'
-- \,
I .-.--
•......, "-• t/
4'.7.*,/ -- -- --. lop* ,...,,,,, .,(;.,\/ __ <". 7. "
• ' ,...c; .
1... i .--........... . / ---
liv./ '<"\,....._____--. ',.... - , , P-- ,,
01111111r • - -77-------r—LE---,:, ---/.. ..--. '
....,
..... , •‘
.,„„„-, ,-----„. :,,, ,-<\?-'• 1 Villiti ' ::
.•...,--, . _...\\ .,,,,„„„ ir ... „......
ill N
SCALE 1 : 11,890
so
------.• 1 ..... —,
ow 1,000 0 1,000 2,000 3,000
FEET
40
mit
Figure 1. Location of subject property.
...,
.....
,
Pima County
ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA
,
_ •_ •,.•.: ,...,..................:••;kit 4.4..c",477471.24,....i."-m-.....0:6-....4.,:::::,5.-4,41.1,,lkiti,,T4
- - - - —- - ----. 17'.--.7.7F4.7.-:::•717 ,.:?'i,-4_'";::r----t-'—.::'•2L;:te..:...''f': ..:(t,:.1.1.V.f.;,'.,..:::::.-;;.::-:'!;:.!.....,!::;;;;`,.;.,,:'.:-...:7'::':,'':'."..':"..:1*-4::-.7;:rtZf'.:191..5'.. .7'..1:17,:ro.it.TIL:t7;,,7,.:4,4 . • .-.:•'•••••'•,-',
t .4::•-;•; ,:;-0. -:.. .7,%•;.:.• •t.::::'-:::%i---...::i 7.-I 1 '1•:_:;?•;. .:,. - ,.*:7!‘.;'),:-.):?.::;::::i•%7:Z;h•$7. !.i..-7...i.f;•,..',:•::017.1-:,,'.ftlx.:*.:iii•,:•FltIvair,:•;:. ,.. • ..,.., -1••
af.....4.•,....4,••. ......-,-.:....• . • , ..., .,..,., ...:4,.,,..7,-.1,: ,-,. , •,....,•,.sr b.,,,,•,...•-41,.A..o. tl.,,,- • -4(i,3, trii;
AI I Or th o p hoto Imagery . •.:.-f-c'.4:-.s.::I.'.'!1.1ri...,:' .. -,, .,-...,;2:•:..,,,-,. ...-: ',Ill ,.:.7';....,;:"7.: .,..itt).-,•;:. .-..:;.....:::!.;,- ...;f::;,....4.%;:,..*.:::1;,..;.:...,.;,-,-..•;4.,&.:.. ;I:;:::..,...,,,..,,44,
-•'`t;*4'-'";'•
i '1'It:14:-*:.t...11-Iril,..%:.°.4.-:!.Z'.:1!;','i:;,:':45--id;..i::..1.ii 11 :,'":".%..i.1Z:..i.).4q1:''''''.;7714.'2.•:"."..-'. ...;et;l: *'.:4"ki','''rci'l..;':7 y.f,44.1.-.....;;:f4.'".1.411; ',..:.....•.•r:Z.,'•...)4-'
=OM
4. Foot R eso.u don I + ! 1'74::.)W.; ........' 4.:I:Itc-,7;'.:!.':.?....k,•7:;.:.,p,;;;41‘..'i`4:..`j'..1 :"....;:.1;.•I:-.•,.,...:;.--;:Y...-1-::1:-.......:.:‘".'..r...-fia)13...`.'Si t;:-':".4 .7:11'PA't.'.;:7'kir..?•cu r'rej.,:r>. -Pi--!-,• ).4",--ti..
...... 1,1:::Aijir.ii.s. ...pl.,"IA.3.::,;:,..T.:t.,i,,ze.4,4t,,,;:iii.::•••,;!:,.:,•;,:,0 F.....-,, -...:.:,:•,::::1-..?,,,..(!. ....,:;.izg.,::;.,..,:::,..-,-;••,.;,?!tift,:s4.,..1..,,:....rf..n.k.....p....i.„-ii;',,,,,,c...-•,, .....i,,,-::,-0...4.,-,,.,,,,J.,
...
, 1.-,...,-,..-‘---.-‘f':. -4-44,,,,,zz--....i:.:-.•,r''''--:•i , ,-;.:!.... :..;•14....1:-.7.*:.',Z..T!z::::%fj-k4C.:,Za.:3;;14),-t-''':c.....___„....;,;:;':'i'f-A:tM'4',-‘1.17t.l.r•r-'-'4:1-`7'4*.'','.:;:- .''s'*. 11.P!.11:1'
- -- 1", - .......--,....;:....1.-:--------.- ','.'••••',, i•-'-”:'•;.-.;,:t''1,'''''..:, ..1:'!:17.--,, 1/ wipremixi....::•isigizmwmillifilffr '2 ••• ','"ir.;.1,-...' '''''.i.
l'*•-""1.."....ri-.7,4),,.. •-i4'it vt?ftS:c.i.IA.-'791....01,1, 1'?' I-- -,-...'•,, ,......-., 1"•.--.---..-- Y -•'••''''''.;:wi..-;t1r-•••.:`...''-..4:201,-- - •••'' '''.''''• ....gt•'`:"'1
.---.. •Ici.;,-..•-,•,-
1 i .;.re.-4'..1t.mii:..c iiti.1.-Sti TN eV.... •• .,....."•?!.«', .... i.,f--a;--7,&••• •,..:.....;.4i.• -;;7'',...-70-1'1,. t2;.:11.,::4:7,!'::..',1;;;,.4'1••••••••72,51,1i-47.5ke• ,/,•••.,-;,- %,,i;4,J
•''.'.."...0.c.'"*"• ':---> 'yr;'- 17,7 .2r-.-:- ....,.:7::.i:.•,,,, ,••••••rf.,.:.••;.:',41_,,./....t.r...,,zr.k 4-,14.!;c:=4......f,,,kt,7:41,,-;,,,,,N .;. jr 44.,„ .1.-,:!hl % -.•.,^
1 ,-...,,,,-..v:,,.. ••..t.. i..p.,,,, ,.. ..,-•,..,,,.... e,,,, ..;--.:,...„,:,,,,,,r..4-,•4.,,.....y:-,:•.-,„,....,?..,-„:„..A...,,,,...r...,,;‘,-,,;.,-,..-,.....i:,,,,,,,,-;•?A: ..., ',..,1 •'...R• .. ".....'
i•:.,...;,:,,o,•-.1::....0,4,1 ,1,:,_..1.7.:',....;', ..;!,,,,...„.e.:5 ..,,,,,'y, t..:Zz..0.4;,..:!.,.;!-...;!,......c...,z,.',;t.,...*--.Y.,,....).-.......i4 N..',-Y.:4.,7.-:.,':-..'41.,.'•14.#,'4%'";"4 L..2,eb,g, .. ,L, ,.N,',.. --''''
'•','C: e-',:(-).;;,.',.--kit.,-.t•ett-rt.'•,.---,,,.:.a.-z,.',It,y .•_-...;.-,.....A „' 11..l'i'••;•...•••••4r•Z•,.,..,,:%,,vii...:i•Zrfril4icf.74 ', ..,"'..„,•11::-.--'
r''..-V-:41n-,..,,,,-:'-...,•:7 1‘..•-.,:.;,-97,4N-;".':.-*--„ •'-=,-.1.1'~4,:,• -.,"-:--.,..1-7'..4;,...,$,-*:•-.4,',V*-,--:,;,V-ir.' ;”'.'k-'':.`7'.c.A!'... .:•i,.:•-••` "---,,114):-•
. ',;• •';;;;-';.::,:-7.,;4 .7.11! 4.!,:.::,.'-f';';'!.:(1 ."Zr.......rtZ;zi;1'.'•:,;'- ,;;.:2:'Xit';:4,•;::;4i:::e*i'11.1..4.KL:77,..*!"-.. 410Pf.• 1
1
-?'‘.-,:::::-'," ..- re :2'..;;-•%7,4 1:' i 'F'''7-1;n:: ..1. ,:?•::5-:!. .t7.:''..:';4:72.,:•%V. "'
ø'- ': ,
1.);;,:r:••":•.;:',:, :.,..;..ik,r.,,..7.;''et.::.;c:-,:.'•:;,,Z,..?....•...-...r.7.-,::....:`-.....7...I.,.3:.j r. ..,:;:xf.1.):-,:.-47,..,:k.,t.v,:_:,..,1,,_•:' .),A.:.ii,..:1:!;:.• - n
;•;-,*,,E.:::',W_L'Ar,74.....-"...",,.1,,,,...:.?,;:;,;';:',..,,c!.:= • .-„:4 ..!...i..." .'-',:,"!:,-;",:-:::*.;•,:y7; :,-,,c;44i.. ...74'.1$I; ..,4111,,:,1-7;-: /.4 ...,::...J ,..?.., 44
,..h.',. : 4.,,,7•0„;.:I".'e:i..;;; '.4:,'L:S 11,;;,',f,:‘, .'..;;`,,'7:''1:a.4, ;:fts::::..!::7-:.',:'',...,,..;;iii...r.:::;.•::., ti,tp.4-Pqt.,,' •,,',:c,..y.:..T4.4.4•;''....,;;:7;1"i,-;1'Z'i-.frf.:":"*.•71)F74g".t'i.t,;,•.:., '.71,ii„",,.:...:.,.;i-t_t-4:i3$V,,,;,:iq:7.7,,-1,4,1_704:','::,V';I; '414;%Z.,2•S.'-t':7,Ct1,,1.4:.4;,K'-:-''.:.•,:`:,,,t,AZir;•-rps.S,-A7*f:i5:l.:6.i4l1t,1•iAktWi*ss:i-;0;J,,,'P•:1..?'.7'';4'';;'41•1L:'i7,2•:s-,Ii4Z.t..':.7.:.':.:4.rti•'"'*74,4i'..;-;.•A,:..Z.C'A•i;i,a,,i;1.•4.t-i1.E1.,11.:-V.''q':- t•i*..;-'.''.7`'•.100tv;i- "• Vn ; ? •/.......*".
i:.;I:iff:;;•zilt-,:.,J s'7'.ft9 1‘,.1,,,c,t:''..'..*';;.--:?".1A:.'s.liei,t,0".-,- '.'.,It.".' ,,..-=-,-;-:.:"..tg.t-),$,;357/;-70..0.lie O.i.;4,,1:7*.,.,: „,., . ,, A.t• -,•...----.-4 2.:.
c.t.i..3011e,..4;il,-,,:*.,,1:,. ,-.:-..-7. .i i. ::c•':itaV?.i4cL:lire,.. ;,,V-. '...-'?,-74 '?...-- • ''47'
!4,:=::•:4:t ..ik-1:tei',.'.,.".• .i!i:.'i.,4'.-- ..P._, ..,... • "•-•..•-.41':','.7,-.I:.4,i.N....,...,.17,:*.).*::.„ .....,..:;...ixire.' / •.P. co 0 , ,t.,:.,.. h• •-•,.;;4.,fr-,-. .:4,
,,:."-.7!*,i-..:;r::,•1,1,..7!..t...- ,z:',..i-"k•aitrIfes,--y," ..J,.,'t-',.:-.r,i.-.i'v!.."-,qz:R?I';;;'''.7f):',...-.' '-''''":,.....D. . ..,, -• ' ..%N.-..7.-''...7• !.:.-"'H;;;.4,4'd'—'cit'i,--
. -,4.?..,,,:ii.j.......-. ....i:::;:cliii,,,:;,..fg., i7itt, ...--=.::-......, ... -4,,..,. .4:,;,:zi„...?:,...i4T5,.!--. - ,-...tii,;,,,-d*,:', :-. ,,,,r.,„,_..,--4,4,,,..- -,./ , •.-,-.„..,-,A." -fif. • ,
F,...,,.. ...,...,,,,,-„,:r..t.:•••<„,,,..„....:. 4..•r: ,.4.-t.....,44 ,.......,..,,,i,:,,,,,-.,......4..,...., --A, :
. ,,....„,„,„. .....„,,,,,,,,,,-,-•:,_..,.„...,,,,:,,•„..-...., ...,.; ,.;: , ._:. —--'',...'7''..4.:.'"ijt.w‘4.13- A4r.. li'l-•','. .f Er- „e7,..,i,ik:. :i:3.7:11r2;s:*s'40:At.: .4,
,4.71"..,r,,...-.Ci.),-;::.F,,'.....”P,..!•••".`"k"".:*,*.t ,.10 ' ••'-:-'' 41.774",'e...f.'"'Wlitit..ri'• •-.-'7,P,I' ..(1 Ar 1;-v.a..- '-'.1,7"''54C. ...!'"1-14: A' •
4.er.,,,,,•••.,:•,,•-:,--i,-••-.. •••.,,..:...,,,,:.;,,,• _...-,i,,..,.1,-.. • ._...,-- •.. „......4.,,,1• 4....-,,••.......:).
011
.; ........,..,8.`-.. ' t' . ,,,`. '....'•...),..”-;r40;.•:..,r.... -."'::".;7,st...':,%, :Z..‘k..)0.1.,Er4 ,-, ..-;,s'ilf's .-4.004.4%','i-:',-.4.t..
* • 4,4:,-0
- Z.6',!:*C:11-•:#: 1`;' '''-'7.t.: ..-a .k,'-.:;.f...:' ' .-. •''-; \-1 .5%..of'i?‘.`;,- 0..:;p:,fr-r,v,,,-L.;-,•' *,,:,.. $„-, -......--rt;,,..,,.....,,,• ...-;,-...,,,.:.,. . ,•
-7!;Z:',7,:'•;:47,..i: Wt4'•;.reii;•: 4,.,/.. •• -.:--• •\ 1:41. '.. :.1'4 %..) ..iit-'-'-•./4,44------./--t• ',..,L,,,-4,4,.:-.;-: -:-
.,..i.,...0•;..7,s • •,I
am
.:Yr'1::t':.7.::-4; -F74:11 ;.,.,+, ,':-.€:. -.. .".; ..--•.',.-,..., • \:;\ 7--'''':/..-•4..- .4 : . A
c---1. 714,'• .; .:±•:.'.. .\,,,.. ',.:,."..-Aii;','-:.y ,—if-i''''..7414::;,',....,•:-.•-:•7.:...-4,-;„i,_-,:t4C,tik iip....,1'
,,',1,:.:::!-1.','`....',:',.;*Z72:::-,..rz:1!...5-z1r4C..,.•441ti,: ,-,i; ,?..",,••••';',1.,-' .....'.:.'"... .S...... .. ,...::.-1-.c-- .3'.1`t.::-...ig`qi ...,-;-,..-;-).Y;e1.1.:',4:...:,t;.....',Ii$,_1:''.1..'-_a,.*':7-;``‘rf..;.•,:;','. ..el'
,
,k.z.i1:11..:::4:a?.'4;.171t7t.'":;;:li-'•,t'`...."..11:':471..Y.-'1`2J..:.;-...:1`-,..-7.,:r,.•::',."?!..--,,,,-/- •:-.!.....',t.,-E...,,,,,,,,,,,,. ....,".,.-:,,,,v,,;,..i,:v-i.,,,J' ..„..,,,.,..,,,,v,,s, . ..:,.......„:„,;;.„,-,.:,..:-„,-i.N,:...,---...7,::.,.F.,74-0. r.-..,:iL.,....,•:.,:,..tzii,,,,J.
1„4„.....,,•,„„,,,,,:,..„4„,,„,-,..„.•:.....„,...,....„,,,,.„ :-..-.,,,,..... L, _...,...,.......,..:...„-,.. . ..„...,„ ,:;.,.,,,.. .,,,...,,, , .. A.,,, ...,.... . . it„.......
p•r.....t,'„:,--7,.-•','...\;.:;•-,-;,.!•-t-.•,....',-.1.',-.•',S6!.••.„,e7...., ..-, .,e**,',7(.' „ ;,1,7..,,r).-',. .•4., .4: .`;J,_•• ,,.... .ix,..0, ......,...,*4A:4, .;,.....;;, f‘... ...th,•44....,....,,,a.
r:',:,'1,',...Z:IL+4'!.!, ,...I.T,:!.:...7e:ea,`7,,•....., ...,:_;..-•:,•-••....., ';:_...:,i,c,..,v-.: ..- •v,f -.....A ..dir- t.:""•'''-er -.4-,1e„s.ii.,,-,t!)."'',..f .s•e-t-,444,-7-ii
..-.1.1.'i.. ..-'-•..-...:,-.:....,.--..------ ..,•-•:-.*:-.,-,.....-;:,--'7.'7.:l'.--•:!-4,,f... -.••••-• ,,. „?..4)- ::iti:•- ..---,,,,,'-'3,-::'''' -.6....,,`-',.. '-4T-74'•.0-'.:,..'Z''.,5‘•N-.,k,f.12-1
r--••!•-•:72 . -•--':, ." 'l'.; " :Aei:.' ()' .-,q... .i.-',O.P.7.;''''''''_, .i'''''''::-... 'f.:41-elle''4; ...t .e.fsje
:.c.:,-14.4%; ----..-?,---- 't,,..,..- it 4.• 0
E „..,,, ...,, .,._....., ..,.. , .... ..,.....,.. .. ,..!.„..:7.,...,.,,..1„...., ,,,,,.. ,....:, ...,#.1....i. ....,,....:7,....,....,... .;.i.: 1..,,,lx..<z__,...!..:.;
;,.. ..„.,.. .. : ... •._
..,....,,4,......,;;...,..._...: ..,,c N. -:.,-. .....,.. , ....,,,, , l'•:•• '. 44
'''''''"-----.•-. '-1,, . •. •.•,..•' '.., ., • ...41,,,..-----,-;,F..."-•=1-**-, ,.. •--1 t.,_ •c.,......-.0,-•-••.:.14.ar...,. .,- ••
'z,-1,-4.::,.;,,-,.....-- . ....:..a...... ., ,-,. .. . ,,,.....-A5.,47-,
••• __ ,
r. , ' ---9,t'it- ,.. , .. ..,..7.).„,....,....!:,.w. • .11.'-. ••••:.`.;i9...*- :,4,-v1.4--•::•-ihrX,/,:o . -',:j
i ..• :''...----.NA. „,,,,,, ..:,-..•. •.•,-.s.., ,:,,-),f,;:14,/[,,....-.',.:,,,,,,.....A.r. ;- ........4.,:.__•,.,..A N.,' .0 04`,,,-Zk.',. ...',.. ',f 1 ,-••.1 ' ,: .,
.....” i. ES,•.. .• . ,P ' : •••••,•...,-j..,.'i....;:ki;''7 7-•••,:,..:,..7-...or . • . •_:-.-.',,.. --.4.%-. v,::, ..Skit0;./.,,,W44..,4•-..4,-/ .0(,.-p., •(,,,) ..• ..,.
,--- .,:7;'sr,,•.•••..-4, v::.,:...,•'.',•;:!.::,,a,''' ,"7, -::,-;•,.' " ‘i Cd>-•.. ''.*...,:•!,,..c, --.4.:.Z..../ .•,. '"*.•-:„*,,:attf, '- '..,,,,:e...
"-i-''••••• 1 r'' .4;• ....,.• ,-..1.'' t..7-',1, ,.- ..:*-i•• '''tr''. .. . ''.•• . • '''.41•... ''.111-C'17,-;1''.'1'rkli .," •.;:r ''4 7:'!
.,.. ....:„.---, -,,-;.-1,--•1,:,..,.-.,,, ..,-,,,,-....,.u...'D:.'..I.,'",,..,:,..: ''.';';'. •.-3,.''':'7",i,. , 1:-....As..40.,,'„,...111S0,,,,. '• '',P,‘")-*_v ....,_,...
r ,71'. rct•li.15:-'..,f.',21:0'':it a,-*;•14e/ji:. ...;..i?'‘i;?./.;-,,,.'':•fri::::,..../ •*4:4
. •.., ,,,•.,• •frAr.;tii rt.P.-•„,,,,_2...!,.. •....,.. .. ).....:-.?...,..L-'
• • •
•.•-':7:', '''',.•4;•'..,F'ki ' '•- .,, ni'.:•,„..T.. ,,,..., _.„,‘,4'7....t.....';"......•;-1!...t.r..A1,-..,-;-....,:•••..' ••• ..'----, t".•:
•.-ZOL.. , ....• ;./.1.!..:,-.1e,,Ael-til'. -?7'' ,,---1--..,,.""N
,,..._,... ,..„..j.::,..,.‘;.,,,., ,...,..., ,.4,,,i,........„..,4..#:7.-. ...• ..,.:.-,•, •,....-- •' ..._....". .:1$..t..„.44br '_. , ,.:•!0. ...-..45,:.,.:,-,,:..vd...,ri....,,... .,..,,,,‘,....,j,Lg.A4.,.,, ,,
;...., , .,..... ,. S. •C a i
_ . ,. , . .. . .,. ........ . •... ,..•.
'f i 1(a'1'1'e. -''-' '"' -.- - • -1...4. • i- , •,.7.#,if.-" -.44..-.'e..,•••-s;Lt1,1'%,,,t....tfr.,:r..4?..40-',11,Se-k f-,Lt"...',,.,:,
...c._, •• , ,, -
, ...
,--•.., ••,. . .4 "., %;, ' iti ,..?..)'--',..•..-•:, ,-,....:••-a.-1*.* 1
... ••.• , . . , • ......, _.. • • • - . 6 •
t'i...' ' .% '04,3e.,%.1r ..,.:i...•./..r..., •• . , „,.___,L1 4 r."". _ •' -
4 .ii:.•.•.,_;;;• . . ...I:•7.,:_1 ',;-..•'• • '• ' '
N
SCALE 1 : 10,244
.}..---......i: -
500 0 500 1.000 1.500
-•.
FEET
Figure 2. Aerial photo of subject property and call-points.
IV
http://mAnN.dot.co.pima.az.usigisimaps/mapguide/pirnamap5.mwf Wednesday, May 15. 2002 1:54 P
i r ....
CFPO SURVEY ZONES
rOCONINO ri
C - -
0
< I,
=
(...)
MOHAVE
Z <C
FLAGSTAFF
KINGMAN l--
Arf——'--—----— l't------- .
1 I \ ,
_.
i
.
PRESCOTT I
/
1 '
I .. . SHOW fik41
YAVAPAI II
t
LA PAZ * GILA
MARIC0 .a
Ili
A LLI
'V -I
Z
-4
11. A 4 Jr" 111
• C"Z
11
i 0
i:.iii::.:::i:::3:::..;.::.i::.:1:.:::-:.:,,,,•!,1:.imi-:.:,,.::.E,i,1:.::.:.::,-:,:::.,:::...::.:::.::,:::.::.,,,,:-::,,,,,,,::.::::•::.:.::„.,:::.,:,:,:,:,:.::,:,:,:::,,::„:.::.,::•:.:..:,.:::.,.:„::.:-..::.:,,,,,,„,:,,:3,:,.:.„..:,..:: _
,7
•..••..•.••••.•••••••.......,..........,..., 6,•••••••
ti:?;i:;*::.::::.:ii.::: •:...:....::::.:::•:.:::.::......:•:...:::.::.•::•:..i..:•:i*:•*if:::•::A::•*:•*.::::::";;;;::;::•: •:::;:i,:. ...:::.i...........,•:•:•,:•:.:•............::.....:
•••••••,,,,,...•..••••• 1.1.,......,............:......::::::.::,:::f:::::::::.:::::::.:::::::::•:.:::::::::::::::;,::•:.:•,:::•:•:::,..:,,,,::::::::::3::$::::,:::::::•:•.;.:::::::.::::%: ocHisE
...,:.:„.....:.:..:.:..:: . ,...,::::::„::::..„::,...........:.....,.....,..........,......, „.....::.........,.............,...................:...
-:i:;:i r"Irtir,d re 0 A
- 0...../..S.,......dr--4c4
Zone 3 •
-.:.-:::.:::.:•:.::1„-::1,:„;f,:3.:..-:.i„i]:...:..i.„ii::,:::•::::•i•,:,:::i::.--•i...:::;i:.i.:i.„ii::i::-i„:::::.•::i::i::.iI:.:.ii..:.i.::i.i::l.:: z 2 Figure ure 3 U S Fish & Wildlife Service Pygmy-
Owl Survey Zones
IIIII Zone 1 •
November, 2000.
•� 1
2002 CACTUS FERRUGTAIOUS
PY644 Y-
OWL SURVEY T
Subject Property:
Parcels "A", `'F", c 7" located in the vicinity of N.
First Avenue and Lambert Lane in Ora Valley, Arizona
(TAX I.D. NO. 220-09-0160)
•
. •
• . •
•
_ it y C sl-o
•T .l 1
ya _til- �f♦f:
01998 Michael J Terri°
MR ,TAY S. MITCHELL
CANADA DEL ORO PARTNERS
401 SOUTH BOSTON, S2400
TULSA, OKLAHOMA 74103-4012
Prepared by Michael J Terrio
Arizona Owl Surveys, L.L.C.
P.O. Box 40482, Tucson, AZ 85717
May 14, 2002
2002 Pygmy-Owl Survey Report/ Parcels A, E, &F/J. Mitchell/ CDO Partners 1
Introduction
This report addresses the cactus ferruginous pygmy-owl(Glaucidium brasilianum
cactorum) (CFPO) surveys that were conducted on the subject property during the 2002
CFPO survey season. The purpose of the surveys is to help determine if the endangered
CFPO is actively using the subject property for nesting, foraging, or other behavior.
The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) recommends a minimum of 3 separate
CFPO surveys for 2 consecutive breeding seasons (totaling 6 surveys) on any property
slated for development that contains suitable habitat for the CFPO. If pygmy-owls are
detected at any time(w-tether before, during, or after surveys), to ensure Endangered
Species Act compliance, the FWS requests that they be consulted prior to development.
Results are valid until the end of the calendar year in which the 2nd season of surveys was
completed. To maintain project clearance and reduce the risk of"take" of a CFPO, the
FWS recommends an additional 3 surveys, with negative results, before removing or
altering any remaining suitable habitat after the beginning of any new year, regardless of
the number of consecutive years previous surveys may have been conducted.'
For authorization to conduct CFPO surveys, surveyors must hold an Endangered Species
Permit marked with a CFPO survey designation. The FWS issues permits only after
applicants provide documentation demonstrating adequate field biology experience.
EMI Surveys for this study were conducted under the authorization of permit #TE83 9510-0.
Study Area
The subject property (Tax I.D. # 220-09-0160) consists of approximately 89 acres located
in Oro Valley approximately 400m (1/4 mi) west of Oracle Road along N. First Avenue.
The property, approximating 793m (2600 ft) in elevation, is divided into Parcel "A"
(approx. 80 acres) and Parcels "E" and "F" (approx. 9 acres). The parcels are separated
by First Avenue and Lambert Lane, with Parcel A to the east of First Ave. and Parcels E
Mir and F to the west of First Ave. and south and north of Lambert Lane, respectively (Fig.
I). The floodplain of a major wash, the Canada del Oro (CDO), runs along the southern
boundary of Parcels A and E. The entire study area falls within the NW '/ of Section 7,
T12S, R14E, of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Pima County, Arizona.
Methodology
Survey procedures must follow established protocol developed by the Arizona Game and
Fish Department (AGFD) and the FWS.2 The survey procedure involves broadcasting
the taped territorial call of a male CFPO at designated time and space intervals on, and
sometimes around, the subject property. Because CFPOs are territorial, playing a taped
' The beginning of a new year coincides with the beginning of a new breeding season for the CFPO,and
because CFPOs may move into previously unoccupied habitat at any time,the FWS recommends additional
if
surveys once the breeding season begins(in areas where suitable habitat is yet to be cleared).
2 Arizona Game and Fish Department and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2000. Cactus ferruginous
pygmy-owl survey protocol.
ARIZONA OWL SURVEYS, LLC
Michael J. Terrio P.O. Box 40482 Tucson, AZ 85717
(520) 319-9127(phone cf fox) mjterrioecox.net
2002 Pygmy-Owl Survey Report/Parcels A, E, &F/J. Mitchell/ CDO Partners 2
call may incite any nearby CFPOs to respond with their own call. They have been known
to respond from up to 800m(1/2 mi) away, and sometimes will approach to within a few
meters of the surveyor. After an initial 2-minute listening period after arriving at each
call-point, the surveyor plays the taped call for 30-second intervals every 60-90 seconds,
alternating between the cardinal directions, for a period of approximately 10 minutes.
This is followed by a minimum 3-minute listening period before moving on to the next
call-point (for a total of 15 minutes minimum at each call-point). Depending on the size
and layout of the property, several of these stations or "call-points" may be needed to
adequately cover a particular parcel. Call-points may be spaced up to 400m(1312 ft)
apart in rural areas, but may need to be as close as 150m(450 ft) in more populated areas
where noise from traffic, barking dogs, etc., may interfere with listening for owls.
Surveys are only allowed during peak activity times of the owl, which are from 1 hour
before sunrise to 2 hours after sunrise, and from 1 hour before sunset to 1 hour after
sunset. Because recent data suggests that CFPOs readily call during bright, moonlit
nights, surveys can also be conducted throughout the night from 2 nights prior to 2 nights
after the official full moon whenever the moon is visible (i.e., not obscured by clouds).
Because it is believed the response rate of CFPOs to taped calls drops significantly during
the non-breeding season, surveys can only be conducted during the breeding season
(January 1 —June 30).
Additional provisions for project clearance from the FWS are that 3 complete surveys
must be conducted for each of 2 consecutive breeding seasons. Surveys must have
negative results, must be spaced at least 15 days apart during any one season, and at least
1 survey per season must fall between February 15 and April 15 (considered the "peak"
of the breeding season). All survey notes and information must be documented on
AGFD CFPO survey data forms. Copies of these forms must be submitted to the FWS
after the end of each survey season. In cases when a CFPO is actually detected, data
forms and separate detection forms and appropriate maps must be submitted to the FWS
as soon as possible after the detection(s).
The subject property was surveyed for the presence/absence of CFPOs during the 2002
survey season in accordance with the procedures described above. Eight call-points were
used, spaced approximately 200-400m (656-1312 ft) apart (Fig. 2). Five separate
sessions were required to complete the 3 surveys. Due to heavy traffic noise along First
Avenue and Lambert Lane during conventional survey hours, the provision in the survey
protocol allowing surveys to be conducted late at night under full moon conditions was
taken advantage of, allowing surveys near the road to be conducted when traffic flow was
substantially reduced. The first survey was conducted between 2 sessions on February
25th and March 1st, the second survey between 2 sessions on March 26th and 30th, and the
third survey during one continuous session on April 27th. Specific time, weather, and
call-point location data for all survey sessions are recorded on CFPO survey data sheets.
The original data sheets are kept on file at the surveyor's office and are available for
review upon request.3
p q
3 19391/2 E. Fort Lowell,Tucson,Arizona,85719,(520) 319-9127.
ARIZONA OWL. SURVEYS, LLC
Michael,T. Terri° P.O. Box 40482 Tucson, AZ 85717
(520) 319-9127(phone 4 fax) rn jterrioPcox.net
1 f i
2002 Pygmy-Owl Survey Report/Parcels A, E, & F/ J. Mitchell/CDO Partners 3
Results
All CFPO survey results within the study area for the 2002 survey season were negative.
No pygmy-owls were detected on or near the subject property, either aurally or visually,
during any of the survey sessions. Surveys conducted on the subject property during the
2000 and 2001 survey seasons were also negative.
Discussion
{
The FWS recommends a minimum of 2 consecutive seasons of CFPO surveys, with
negative results, before developing in areas where a loss or disturbance of owl habitat
may occur. 2002 is the third consecutive year in which CFPO surveys have been con-
ducted on the subject property, and the results have been consistently negative each year.
The subject property is approximately 3 miles from formerly federally designated CFPO
critical habitat.4 Additionally, the property does not fall within a FWS designated "Zone
1" areas; it falls within a "Zone 2" area (although it is adjacent to a Zone 1 area). Zone 2
areas theoretically have less potential for CFPO habitation than do "Zone 1" areas, but
more potential for habitation than do "Zone 3" areas (Fig. 3).
Specific vegetation characteristics of a property are critical in determining the potential of
a site to attract CFPOs. Vegetation common in known CFPO habitat in the Tucson area
falls within the Palo Verde-Cacti-Mixed Scrub Series.6 This includes a well, structurally
defined mixture of canopy, mid-story, cacti, and shrubbery type plants. Examples of the
species that may be found include small shrubs such as triangle-leaf and white bursage
(Ambrosia spp.) in the understory, whitethorn and catclaw acacia (Acacia spp.) in the
midstory, and palo verde (Cercidium spp.), ironwood (Olneya tesota), and mesquite
(Prosopis spp.) in the canopy layer. Saguaro (Cereus giganteus) and other cacti such as
prickly pear and cholla (Opuntia spp.) are also quite common in CFPO habitat.
Parcels E and F have a gradual south-to-north ascending slope with desert broom
(Baccharis sarothroides) (a large, dense, green shrub) and cheeseweed (Hymenoclea
salsola) prominent throughout. The canopy structure consists of scattered and small
4 As a result of a lawsuit filed by the Southern Arizona Homebuilders Association,et al,against the FWS, a
federal judge ruled in September 2001 to remove the designation of more than 730,000 acres in southern
Arizona(260,000 acres in Pima County) as critical habitat for the pygmy-owl. Although U.S. District
Judge Susan R. Bolton ruled that the FWS did not adequately study the economic impact when designating
critical habitat for the owl,she did ask the FWS to consider re-imposing the designation after completing a
more thorough investigation of its economic impact.
5 As a general guidance to landowners concerning potential CFPO habitation,the FWS has divided Pima
County into"Zone 1"and"Zone 2"areas. Both zones contain suitable habitat,hut the potential for CFPO
habitation,based on historical records and current knowledge of active territories, is believed to be greater
for Zone 1 than for Zone 2(urban areas excluded; areas not Zone 1 in Pima County are automatically
classified as Zone 2).
6 Brown, D.E.(ed) 1994. Biotic Communities: Southwestern United States and Northwestern Mexico.
University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.
ARIZONA OWL SURVEYS, LLC
Michael T. Terrio P.O. Box 40482 Tucson, AZ 85717
(520) 319-9127(phone cf fax) mjterrioecox.net
2002 Pygmy-Owl Survey Report/ Parcels A, E, & F / J. Mitchell/ CDO Partners 4
mesquite and palo verde. There are no mature saguaros (i.e., large enough to support nest
cavities) on the property. Whitethorn acacia(A. constricta) and desert hackberry (Celtis
pallida) comprise most of the midstory level vegetation. Prickly pear and cholla are also
present, as are various grasses and weeds. Parcels E and F are relatively barren of the
denser-type vegetation and structure required by CFPOs.
Parcel A has both flat and hilly terrain and has a fairly good mixture of canopy, midstory,
and understory vegetation. A few isolated mature and cavity-ridden multi-arm saguaros
are also present. Dominant canopy vegetation on Parcel A includes velvet mesquite (P.
velutina) and foothill palo verde (c. microphyllum), with occasional blue palo verde (C.
floridum). Desert willow(Chilopsis linearis) is also present along the wash, mixing in
with the mesquite and palo verde to form a significant "gallery forest" stretching more
than 400m. Dominant midstory vegetation on Parcel A includes whitethorn acacia,
catclaw acacia (A. greggii), desert hackberry, and desert broom. Other mid-story species
present include Mexican crucillo (Condalia spp.), graythorn (Ziziphus obtusifolia), and
four-winged saltbrush(Atriplex canescens). Cholla and prickly pear are present but
appear to be limited. Barrel cactus (Ferocactus wislizenii), pencil cholla (Cylindropuntia
spp.), hedgehog cactus (Echinocereus spp.), and pincushion cactus (Mammilaria spp.)
can also be found. Dominant shrubbery on Parcel A consists of burroweed (Haplopappus
tenuisectus), cheeseweed, and ragweed (Ambrosia spp.). Other shrub species found
include triangle-leaf bursage, desert zinnia(Zinnia acerosa), and brittlebush (Encelia
farinosa). Paper daisy (Psilostrophe cooperi), desert marigold (Baileya multiradiata),
white ratany (Krameria grayi), and various other native and non-native grasses and
weeds are also present on Parcel A. This parcel, although much more suited for CFPO
habitation than Parcels E and F, lacks the ironwood trees and strong cacti presence
(including saguaro, cholla; and prickly pear) often found in CFPO habitat. However,
with a natural wildlife corridor (i.e., the CDO Wash) bordering the parcels, it is
reasonable to assume that CFPOs may be attracted to or near the subject property.
Because CFPOs usually fly only short distances between perches, biologists speculate
that heavily vegetated washes are often used by CFPOs when they disperse or seek out
new territories.
Another important factor when considering CFPO habitat suitability on property is the
level of development and other human induced disturbances already present immediately
on the subject property and around its boundaries. Parcels E and F, with their relatively
small size and proximity to heavily traveled Lambert Lane and First Avenue, in addition
to being next door to residential development, are already subject to various roadway and
noise disturbances that would probably preclude CFPO habitation on the property. Also,
the lack of vegetative diversity and structure on Parcels E and F is probably due to past
disturbances on the property itself. For Parcel A, other than some unimproved dirt roads
and trails that lace through a portion of the property, it does not appear to have any
disturbances that would preclude CFPO habitation. However, moderate to heavy
recreational use of these trails with motorized vehicles may deter CFPO habitation.
Although First Avenue borders Parcel A, the majority of the property extends well
beyond any disturbance that the roadway may cause.
ARIZONA OWL SURVEYS, LLC
Michael J. Terri° P.O. Box 40482 Tucson, AZ 85717
(520) 319-9127(phone .4 fax) injterrio@cox.net
1...., Inia uounty
w .
...
.....��.�..�.. ... _ ......__�.-..�.......•._ 'rte�...yr ';f.e•{� ,Vti f� •�;. s.. ► ',•�r�� yam_/ ' i..�►� 1;� +.••a- f 1 .♦ .�-
I- •e� � �� Ij. • +, i.',fi r•:•'.[ r4 Z•i��i4 K...a' i Li•1;%,;,'t,;,,...-.;1",.<,,,,,,,,,p,_� w�1' z,h1. t♦�• <L./►•i ,.- •,. .�._ a
j •. .1 1tt.r.e •►? ...,.,,,,,,,,.,41.i.;,1**...� r 4' .f ter. i ni r Fi:.ti • .ti� .�3a'?•Sri 1 1•-:S.a•'r 3jf r•
ark ••� •'t L �� T • y� •�� t �
A t l Ortho h o t o Imagery •'l am�;t �r' '+_,,� �;•l „.., �.., �11!.��. ITY',44. •�•,. ��aa''` • ,..!•f. � ` •. '1- `s1;;r;/ ' (r••• -. /!f T` i ~ w 1 ,'T'�,irr5�' . �••1%f•;,i.Y1- - • `;1.,�•� P'_•r•l•n f•%1 aye .- ,.fr•
�: Ca •• r •%'
•'•'V1 !'.'e 1' r'} t•7.l' 1A. 'fir;444,%. i .1.:1 , �.., r 4 i ,,�i
■ : 4 Foot Resolution = � :�., =� '... *� -�,J{} r=;k :r. }._ ��. �' r. .
.• •'' •��!f • ••k••,....'..,,.."41,...410,41:4-• . rl_1 4a �a f. j'✓ O • .,c. v r�� �i�� �',
*-"Y4
C-"Y •4 r '• -•� ;� air," •'moi .'4 �'^;11..y, 't4i:,r •a`a;=s 11r '1� .., -�, " ''' ..t1�` . • }•f• ?..-�-,•.•-c.
I f:. �.�i. 7 Y. y�l�:i} ,T�' 44i�. �r�'i.i.'w1 , y t!�'��,�"•�!:�. •,+i w`�!�'Y'`h. -Cs4'�. �4h'•� :1, '1�'.4
baa , r �y . e#A. .ti,?� �' ��.c..;�.`,�� i t� • . a • Cy
_._ -�........__-___ ar:�••+�7if�LA • -{',•y, 'Yrr'•.l,4it•. -.•.:1 ;. 0 ',. t 7'.'4. ) •� .( t y' • �r r e,,, 1•.. 4 .. �' -4 I.
J•'.... r,',..t�lP ,ti„ .Fk ,.1. .•:.CY,�F.. '..� .r a' '�4 .{=- 4 1 . r_.. ♦':3 'r i
�ti. d ' ,i.•,-,--- ,.1CY-1,f:, ••f_• y•. -• '•� - r~••'' .� .f•I` •,''•
4i•• "`�
• .• [� :'`I •1!i / !;.tom lir rt f,„. . ., .Z.S.„e` t� `�"" •• 3 f�• ,., •. •T1
• �r r4: •• �, 1"Se r ti's,� T. i-' � A-
-,• i. ', ry ~r- ,r ��� tr ...i 74, � 'I • yj ` r.+Sir_,..,•‘:•,." 'r�
.tt.7,-
,.
.�', 0'riJ �,►���. .♦;�.i :i, ."t",��_, • i j,� � '�L''}��. +•' f�') • +it,+.. •t.i7'i`,�r.•_%..� � •� r- �i ''`•�
'•_..r• ► r+,-!' - ♦- 't�� 'U ' • . '•"r -a - rte% t R yy�.geP-I {V ' `"•-- .40-4a ••-,.. �'.
t.-,�•_t',,,,, . , ii,;/ ,..;;:4:' x`il.;''=7" '.'L .T f ' , y:;..t y r'. - .•44';F*
• , 'F'' • ? ..•, 4`' ;, ZH
C•'>Gti"��,Y,t���• ,j'tai •�.M�,."�,f:'i,._- • ,_ ��'C,�'+,�.{�t';,=rl�t� �� '�� wT��.r• ,�•,� .S� ;�� '1��� ''T`i� •i•z - '*,._W r �a �.-- •-.y�tT1S is.. i r. .,,',,r I•g;•4•.,j •,44. M ►'„}� •ie „.77.4.-_...4,1, i `•# - .I 4", G 'e.. .,,it. f.Q ,'dC -
4.
�11r��y'��r� �•;r •�j..1:2,41,44.-:"�a�:,�' •y.♦ ` .� � �tti ��.' '!'i"34.4-
"7�}•t '•�, �"+ '�Tt`•4 r."�`.. ' +' 11 4.-:".
ikii, �' , ..• ., ; 1 ~_••Vi.# • ,• tei •1�P t '�",#:;
.1:• ' -
irt, •
i.''t 1c .4.e:4,, . •y;.' +-fit,1�•::'=N.rt !t j�4.,r�,.• .rte ►r rlr . _ :+ij1.y`!.u. .mo. r ` a
l}_ a t ed •-•," ••O' '. 1 _el -y1,.�v'►p, i•l•F�.s,•. ire, ''60. ':*. . .4 - r• ,,
C c 7•. a ' a, •5.t,, *St . t.K 1 -,,.,'4..., i �fo4' •. '• -�' ii�J^ ' [ 'r # •'
J•. ♦ e '�,, { . .rL '
`SS A• ..4.' f .4N..., ♦ Trti��•!� � s /.. '1l 't' • ''r'� "�1� ....:4-4-,, 7' r, nb-1 �`• .�.
,,-‘..114',1,-. `T *L:a�1?.;�'t�f� r:'�.r f tri •{,�•y1• �`���: •^i. .• �.,.k�: ^a'�'��...,� �r � �.,!' /��` .. ^r.�J!'
y*rS,a41t-Lkt•g•►•.tai. �iiY •'f 1..t(w .,. ,R` 4Y "7.� :. � w',..1*.-'f+'1 'a}.-IT: -f='-' ."'d_r
-��.,/L..y.y� .! •0:1
i♦ * � ••ii1'f"�� te..,. 1 ��' r. t1.a. ♦ +�� `� � T^ •1�• .� Jr'I �'.� .,,p'
f,: � -iY'Sa��- •{ - • • ,i/"' -r"i r! .•# - , '. ,i- - :;,,,,'.4.-,e-
Y. d'.e-._ s' 0.-k-,-.-4• .-<
�S t � ♦• ., � ,�.••�_ M� �• ✓1•,al7y.. {••���r-1471t, i i• t■...: ✓, -i. fie+ .! J •• __ _�. rile f. 1•4TJ'. -' I S,,s,[{ J
�f � -.s�Y, R�: � •+IC - ••► !!. 4T'•S ( � �„!t t "sa- .,,-."1:-...
•�"Gr `� � �y' ..�'y 'ar
T1s i ~ • _ �7 - 1y s. .! r• j' s-,"• .. r. ��'+'a ,
N„.„f il •'t- , •-`i _ si.••a'! - ;IV!,
+' ilf, , _.yli y. i•11.,/� i•. f,l tri}y*.,.. .` ;.4,,M.'„,fy N:'" •,..-:,,-...,.e.�• '.
.'i �-+... •� 1 /rL' /'., .. •tt+.i1 ' r.7S,,.T--. "•s a%.�.�y 3• - r. ,/''� _r. = I. `i
t1 .rt;L�4w � - -■++i.at".. Y,•M: 1 , T;. .t. ��,• � • "''Ii.�_ y ,'.,',..v....-if-'4,•=i1.---.''''‘.....-7-•:.% : . j t t''' '.�'
(, .• ,. ..;X'• �'::i'•• t _ - '. •••l,•, .i ..!...i. •'.,?:. ^e! ' .ti' j -f•efi'.":,..V,--
/.J••R 1,_
1.....4:4J'• �•p�,'•a.•�_�_�.• .4'. �� •�f�- r'• 1' �`-'�i �1...,:e";,..:.13-...,• •: /J1 t ;•�ls,r`�= ra.�, 'tt' •. -.
•�ir•• :[,..4:41.-2„,„
7 'kc Y t �_#;i :i.i4. '//�� .. • :' _.• • t ii.",:;,',4",,V,..,..,,,,..747%,-4.,:f r r f _y` . I,,, '•, f. ''[ •',Y' ,�!" tv T>„f'a.\ r•ii• Ni+�y #a � .s,�; ' � .. , �•a•�` ; �-.fir` r-1••r,.. •++'• 47 3 � �5 i 4T 3 !,1'' 't.- -,,,• '! _: T Y ''ice «..../•,J:" ._•.. •. • •itt
.�' - J�'•1 '2'..i�f{l. i � .� r ,`• ♦C. y"/7'•••• .•:,,..1i .._,,,4.:54.7-... � ti:;;f t•;. •' 1 •
,:A---...s.,41:,,av„--,,,,,,-.1i,MR9r-
ri '1'E y ..' 4.tja4• .' •.+�•". - i •' _ , �.,�! �:-..'i - i• -r ,,• ,
. �i1i•C'1TAq;,.-{+. ,.•...•. •
+-• • :1- •• `_..,i '-h-. r. ,,14.1,..::
!• r:: +'�y.•xa,� i•, y' fi r.•��j •'fir
(• •q• t�.z.�;.4.:..`.r:?..-,,' ♦ ' i+ �' ./ j, ;' %;.:-,-"%1::"
,-,' r'i.L.;.. i"Y,�")'T�'.i 2,42',.-••'O��• St a'i'r tc• lAt.t'' `t ?yr• .�, ;�. *Ni
•l'}N.,, ..•-�x'- t,„..- ,',"3'1, `�� ---,';',71F ,%:,.
--,';', .Wx,% .. -' `.',N. ''- • `-,0,,, ,1_J_ ' ../ ::-• ..* I i fTT ,►- �
•�. ., Ttii-• L t•a,, V,�.�� :�.f.,J ., � ,: � +6 .�i+r � � J.� ,�f� _a •''•�t.•%'�. r tom..
•
���i1S ``Y/��s�Y'r`r�; of}•• ��•',T'• '�+.. �'- • F• ..:yJ,;,}t��•4 : Tti`-i :fir _'r.it'''.
��•.,• .:vi„♦�s ±r.� ~`'�f•�r�- •
' ,*.J•."'4t..:4-. v.,a•� 4r - l' •i(.. •'rye '. �i • , Fla - '+.yyi�j 1� .' jt .S.• ►
• .•tom e1:S, �+• �1 -.a;!i,ir. •"., `! ..aj. . •• . .'4 .-10'� -•: .ir,'14-.r;11' tit .y
1.
'�;l.�l ►:y i�Fr QTY}+,``'•
ft• .F••i '7�� L.r '� � -•�/• oM ••��a► 1� �•t• .,15 .,� [ � 'i.`I'.�i y•!j^�••��mac+*It �.t�•.�����•'_• i�'s 043,l�b tC.11 ! .a r• ' ` ` 1 r.i -j • i. -a r� .:.`���., ° /r t''b ;ti xy..ti+�'�"'r ! ' �'rtjl 'f+�j+1'`7t♦ �It •1•, ti.L ,�._ ..h r•r-; .l +_ r, 'rr • a i". :\, _ { �,;i.!_-67. r
• �_,M '{�. y�'', 1 �/l.:'T ,";,.•A' -.r,' I,rr�tiry���� 14. i. ¢ . 7i' ��•�••• .rr 1 '' f. A.c • ! 'y��{�,�y [ •.1 •'cam �.�,�ji. .�„ 'JJ,: /,[ '• all•( l ..r .��. ♦ r. �N 'r -.^‘-' ♦ •.� '.!4.1.•' t •,
Fi' t `l V•� f •- � •/
� I fJt J} y•1.'1,7.14:; -,"%;779"
:�i .'/ �, ' •�•i ) .. '� 4.� ` '. J/_ • •� i�'. .. •-...^1.1-41,,,,,,
-`mow i�tel'►/..t.�.~' ,�• -_...,. - i,
1:',;',..,4,i Y :!_.i r,e's-i 'y� f:7� "% �i'' :� ; � ',1,�`.ctr r7�3 e '♦ !_,. ,"r"� - phi •�f �4�o��•Y•''•��y•�"��';�'`1�..L �'�•• •t •T*17�.� ,� :�•✓ *• � ,�/ •.-���♦' /�!1�� d'_''•� tl:r:�,��h1`� �a-, • 't r "i z, .� 1� ,, ,rK. ,; s -4 K� a ,�1 ,1a!��a •(9• ..Pa..."4t1►.. �'' 't .a+"yi -....1,;--.1..,
•4. �� f .�••� i'�.�.t.' •i r ,�'��•' ..i��..JJ Cts. e" •
�a'•F_ 1. �'l. .,T�'A y +ir}I� w. ••':"�„
4A,p tom"•a.. a. .♦ �'�.:1 ..,1:-..,.-4,.4:',4- .r,: .,. a ::-1- , •- 1 �• P _ '• I.;t ,ji,:
+i-•► .'. 7j'-T / ?!r1Rt • .r._ ♦. •_- ..:.t •t. t. i7-:-.74V 1. X'j r !e
'e. .. _tya7 r•r,. `- ..✓ _!--.a I:-, ,, :4 il`..,...-:...."..,,,,,k,
-: _ : ► •TJ `- :.�lftll^'.. --4.Y- i ce` •i tl. ..f...
-•.•.
YI tM•, +� =r, �- ,v TT .; • J•�-- .rs ,-,..m.,,,147
.., ‘40-.4.
% T� e •�.
•
i
;,••e.;
1-1.4
y ••'••,.).
• rra i '•�.. ;;..�/� r �• st• � ?• •r'a � ..- ti '�� :r':�'
„W,.•� i.65...4a..
4'fes ' ....► . r. /��r', •'r--.--..t{�+ (Z '.. •'�'.`;„;•i r�-4 �-` • r' Y .Jy� •'
tr'♦,: ;I"- ' � r •I /. '.t'•4- W. •ri'•1.r S�."'''.0
'' 4�- ♦ sem. •r ,� r, -i•-•%\s'"74.'
r +�,�:','-:;4,..„,,,..„,,,0,, ,--.44.,.....:;,...«.:".- +.��rr,�•t �R��.• :t '�•� i-! +•r�� � �� �.�. :f% r�y���1>..Y�•a�r•- � +y�' �.�L.
* . 1 d r' ,f .. j � - :•'', eil.f.djitf;-.X,''',
0 rel a,__TT _7,r, ^d ',���'�'..,�j , ,l. +i " r.♦ - ,y,.•(C.. =Kj'�f.•. f ''(i.g••'•• •,'�•i� ' ,,,.' !a r ?Y rlt•
r:,,
_ :.
$. �;..'.tA •�,�ay'• •:! �'• ee,,i
-,.f.�[` ..•b-f... . r+ �• ,\ fir_ y r ♦ •i
•
41
. ..1. ..,. .:..v„.,.•_
tt,„.
`, . i•'a +,,,♦ 7�i •', f ,,• -1' i, ..a,....0,._.,....
tr Ii.1Ji }ttj .�T� ,• n..�+6' ,. .( T•/ "'��.XXX„1,.;,_ • rY
e.
,,,-,._.
:...,.,,,...z.,.,
,_
,._
4.
i' `,. �' (:40/14.
• 44.,?`-i..-,;141-',..'
i�•r f r'e i E"!a_ :_- -ge-
IA. -C.';'',\', ' • ,,.. • ��� ..+,'.. ,i r, r ••
`'� F ..y, f.• ••-,4!'• .` ,r. ..4.3...Fil ...A..t P.•i• .. yiT{ •`•_ •'s' �`��i' Y �►'���' ,•r'O• li- ? 'S'C'1�=� 7"
f i•' :�'}!t .• a'laS-. �A[�.. •i. ri+ `i1...4•s. _ � • ••.' .
'4, ,?��I:.rr r ,;'h,�' .ta'.;. .•'['.r. .•f ,tis" ?�'�$• _,: •. 'j,', ':•,T.r• •t r`, .s•, n,r.-. ..
' '••r♦ �•i �r +''- • .J!f. .✓'.t.al._ "IL' '' :w ,a; • 'T. �� ..f .= n
I,
i- � :.,;�' .ty �4 _a�y�• . 'u ✓' a t•y+�C.�.r.,.„,,,,,4„.„..'^ p�1 s�; ftp•i R:`.,i i r.,,,,,a:..0,,,,�-��Thli`- �,.
h,4-.�•v�'.i.'� _ _ -*''',144--__ . ''...--•''',.--
••`?.' f',;:r y,�i: 1r '-.:...y.1,•c ' t:4' '.. {�." '�7' .'_
t•-"I: - ., • j•.y ..r .:• r•'„• y-,.t'`(QT';";-,t44-7'.43;,•:,- :.iY.,i.y; :t J s ,A-5-,.. ' 'i'
, paw
a� _„...jam -•'i•• :,7,;w 2�. i '•;,.;-,1�` :_,,Fr� rr1 ! '�, ,` 5.; :1�^" ,: - �.'. ÷:,-_..s,_y4 •_4t:L---..- • }/y. '.'
N
SCALE 1 : 10,244
1
500 0 500 1.000 1,500 1
FEET :1'
1
r
1
i
r
f
Figure 2. Aerial photo of subject property and. call-points.
••
•
http://www.dot.co.pima.az.us/gis/maps/mapguide/pimamap5.mwf Wednesday, May �15, 2002 1:54 P
11
P.A.SIT.
P.A.S.T. JOB NO. 031543
OVERVIEW. An on-foot cultural resources survey of Private property (79 acres) in anticipation of
land development near Oro Valley in Pima County identified no cultural resources and 2
isolated artifact(s).
INTRODUCTION
(Dl) Cultural Resources Survey Of The Rooney Ranch Parcel "A" Project
Near Oro Valley, Pima County, AZ. (D2)
(D3) Agency Name:
(D4) ASM Permit No. 2003-35BL Other Permits: NA
(D5) Project Description: The land is slated for mixed residential and commercial development.
(D6) Agency Reference:
Project Sponsor: Monterey Homes
(D7) PROJECT LOCATION INFORMATION (see also attached copy of USGS map)
County: Pima Vicinity of _ Oro Valley AZ
Legal: Within the NW4 Section 7 Ti 2S R 14E G&SRB&M 4
AZ QUAD USGS MAP NAME MAP SCALE
1 . BB:9 NW Oro Valley 7.5'
2. `
(D8) SURVEY INFORMATION _J
Non-collection on-foot survey Y with systematic 20m transects or equal Person-days 1
Type: .
79 acres AND/OR 0 miles BY 0 foot wide right-of-way Percent surveyed 100%
long g Y
Land Ownership Private
Field Crew A. Lenhart Project Director: David Stephen
Field Work Dates l April 28, 2002 Ground visibility was effected mildly
Additional Survey Records Submitted: None Artifact Collections Submitted to ASM: None
(D9-1O) CULTURAL RESOURCES WITHIN PROJECT AREA (see report narrative for additional information)
Archives Researched: ASM AZSITE ❑ SHPO I❑ GLO ❑ MNA [1] Other:
Numbers of eligible sites NA Numbers of ineligible sites NA —,
Previously recorded sites NA New sites found this project NA
Artifact scatters NONE Total sites NONE
. NONE Isolate density /total artifacts <1 per acre 2
Sites within 100 metersO density
/total
in 1 .6 km radius i:3:10, FF:9:17,BB:9:109, BB:9:2,BB:9:75,BB:9:3,BB:9:225,BB:9:1 10
Ref. No. Of Prior Surveys ASM 1988-93 Roone Ranch Surve 6-23-1988
(Di 1) RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER WORK (see also comments below)
FURTHER WORK RECOMMENDED NONE OR
SITE RECORDING , MONITORING E SUB-SURFACE TESTING E DATA RECOVERY D
❑
COMMENTS (see report narrative additional information)
The quantity of artifacts within the subject property and data about known sites suggests the
undertaking will impact no cultural resources. Based on the field work and archival
documentation, the project sponsor should be allowed to develop the subject property without
further cultural resource studies.
Form Completed By ` Davd Stephen iForm Rev. 1/02 Date \ 5/30/03
� �
Rooney Ranch Parcel "A", Page 1
CULTURAL RSURVEY OF TELE
ROONEY RANCH
PARCEL "A" PROJECT
NEAR O VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA
PAST No. 031543
Introduction.
Personnel from P.A.S.T. conducted a 1 person-day, survey of the Rooney Ranch Parcel
A pop y on r ert April 28, 2003 located in Pima County near Oro Valley in anticipation of
p
mixed residential and commercial development. The purpose of the project was to
t rmine whether anysignificant cultural resources that might be adversely impacted
dee
construction were present. The project sponsor (Monterey Homes) initiated this study
by 2
in
accordance with municipal requirements. P.A.S.T. holds permit003-358L issued
under the Arizona Antiquities Act through the Arizona State Museum.
Project Location and Ownership.
approximately 79 acre project area is located in the portion of the Tucson Basin
The pp y United States Geological
1). The project area is located on the Oro Valley g(Figure
Survey 7.5'm ap. The location with respect to the Public Land Survey
is within the NW4
of section 7 T125 R14E G&SRB&M. The UTM values for selected boundary points are
shown on the map to provide the dimensions of the parcel. The boundary shown on
isreasonablyaccurate given the limitations of a 1 :24,000 scale map. It is
the map field on data and maps provided by the client as well as fi� d observations but it is
not intended to represent the precise legal extent of the parcel. Unless otherwise
noted,
Land ownershipcoincides with the parcel and survey boundary shown in Figure
1 . The fieldwork was conducted on private lands.
Base Maps included in Report
Figure
1 is a copyof a portion of the U.S.G.S. Oro Valley 7.5-minute topographic map
that shows the project boundaries, archaeological sites within the project area, and all
isolated artifacts and features found during the survey. Projects extending across
multiple maps are so noted on page ii and in the lower left of Figure 1 .
p
BACKGROUND TO STUDY AREA:
Effective Environment.
The study
area is within the Basin and Range physiographic province at an
approximate elevation of2,600 feet. Project area vegetation is typical of the Arizona
Upland subdivision of the Sonoran Desertscrub biotic province (Turner and Brown 1982)
predominately comprised of polo verde, semi-shrubs, annual grasses, creosote and
p
mesquite.
Records Review.
A review of the records of the Arizona State Museum (ASM), in anticipation of the survey
revealed that � parcel the subject had not undergone a complete archaeological
time has passed since an earlier study suggesting heretofore
survey or sufficient
undiscovered
cultural resources mayhave been subsequently exposed that would not
P.A.S.T.
Tucson,Arizona
USA
520.82 5.3 536
{
Rooney Ranch Parcel "A", Page 2
have been documented by the initial field work. The ASM records, as well as the other
archives indicated on the associated project form, revealed no recorded cultural
resources on the inspected parcel. Previously recorded cultural resources within a 100
meterp erimeter around the project boundary are noted since such resources may
account for the presence of isolated non-site cultural entities found on the parcel.
Recorded cultural resources within a 1 .6 kilometer radius of the center of the project
area are listed on the project summary form and in Table A-2.
Culture History.
The antiquity laws apply to human cultural remains in excess of 50 years of age and
q y important information.
require them to be assessed as to their potential for yielding
q
Consequently, sites and artifacts dating from the mid twentieth century and earlier must
hl �70o is of
be evaluated. The historical period that commenced in roughlycomprised
the Spanish, Mexican and Anglo occupations with some researchers recognizing the
protohistoric as a transitional culture from the earlier prehistoric occupations. The
prehistoric peoples who lived in this region include the Hohokam, Archaic and
p p
Paleoindian cultures.
The Hohokam A.D. 450 - 1450). The Hohokam were a sedentary, agriculture-based
people who produced both plain and decorated pottery, along with numerous other
p
crafts of shell, stone and clay. They were skillful agriculturists who lived in houses built in
shallowp its and constructed extensive irrigation canal systems. In some of the larger
,
villa estheybuilt ballcourts that probably served as focal points for ceremonial or
g
recreational activities. Whether the Hohokam migrated into the region from Mexico or
developed ed from indigenous Archaic populations is still hotly debated. The Hohokam
cultural sequence was established in the 1930s based on the decorated pottery types
unearthed at the Snaketown Site in the Phoenix Basin. Shortly thereafter, Isabel Kelly
modified this chronology to fit the Tucson Basin sequence after her excavations at the
Hodges Ruin in Tucson. Since that time, the continual acquisition of new
archaeological data has brought about many refinements in the chronology.
Archaic Era (7500 B.C. - A.D. 450]. The Archaic era has traditionally been characterized
by assemblages es of chipped stone artifacts along with ground stone tools for processing
plant materials, and a lack of ceramics. Recent research in the Tucson Basin and
elsewhere has demonstrated the presence of pit house villages, agriculture and some
ceramics in the Late Archaic. The shift from a hunting-based economy to a reliance on
plantforaging fora in and small-game hunting that characterized the Archaic sites was
caused by the extinction of Pleistocene mammals favored by the Paleoindians.
Pa
leo-Indian EraLcJ0 000 - 7500 B.C. . Eleven thousand years ago, the climate in the
t
Southwestern United States was considerably wetter and cooler than it is today, and
much of the terrain consisted of lush grasslands that supported herds of mammoth,
bison and other large grazing animals. Many of the earliest occupants of the area,
known as Paleoindians, were hunters who subsisted on these large, late Pleistocene
mammals. The belief that manyof the Paleoindians were primarily big-game hunters is
supported bythe fact that most of the Paleo-Indian sites that have been excavated
have been kill and butchering sites. The artifact assemblages from these sites are
made upof projectile points and other stone tools suitable for skinning animals and
cutting meat and bone. The earliest Paleo-Indian artifacts found in southern Arizona
P.A.S.T.
Tucson,Arizona
USA
ren ore czc
r `
Rooney Ranch Parcel "A", Page 3
belong to the Clovis complex (9500-9000 B.C.), which is characterized by long,
lanceolate, fluted Clovis points, along with other stone implements and bone artifacts.
Survey Expectations.
This project's study area was located in a portion of southern Arizona that is conducive
to prehistoric and/or historical settlement. Therefore, it was considered a reasonable
likelihood that prehistoric or historical sites would be found during the survey.
CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY:
Methods. u~
The field work consisted of an intensive on-foot coverage of the property by our staff in
order to identify and locate any cultural resources, historic or prehistoric, within the
property boundaries. Field personnel (A. Lenhart) were spaced approximately 20
meters apart and crossed the subject property in a series of contiguous corridors with
any areas of extreme slope covered less intensively. Survey transects paralleled the
longest dimension of the property except when prevented by the landform, vegetation
density or hydrological features. Unless noted otherwise, the transect count is the
quotient of the transect extent and parcel width. General conditions were for
conducting the fieldwork. Ground visibility was effected by the presence of trees,
shrubs, semi-shrubs, succulents and grasses. The original land-form was disturbed by
modern alterations to the ground surface.
Survey Results.
The information derived from the field work is generally in keeping with the expectations
generated from archival and literature sources. There were no surface indications of
archaeological resources on the property which meet the Arizona State Museum
minimum standard for recording as an archaeological site or that would be eligible for
inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. A total of isolated artifacts or non-
site features were noted (see Table A-1 ). As relevant, discussions of non-site resources
are presented below. More recent cultural manifestations identified during the survey
include dirt tracks, informal trails and a light scatter of trash. All appear to be modern in
origin.
Evaluation of Cultural Resources.
Although archaeological and historical sites may qualify for formal recording under
state standards, they generally are not considered significant unless they are eligible for
listing in the Arizona or National Register of Historic Places. According to the current
standards a property must possess sufficient integrity, significance and antiquity to be
listed in the Register. In addition to being at least 50 years of age a resource must meet
the criteria set forth below:
The quality of significance in American or Arizona history, architecture,
archaeology, and culture is present in districts, sites, buildings, structures,
and objects that possess integrity of location, design, setting, materials,
workmanship, feeling, and association, and:
A) that are associated with events that have made a significant
contribution to the broad patterns of our history; or
B) that are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; or
P.A.S.T.
Tucson,Arizona
USA
G'1 it O-t►7G14
•
Rooney Ranch Parcel "A", Page 4
C) that embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or
method of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that
possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and
distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual
distinction; or
D) that have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in
prehistory or history (National Park Service 1986)
Eligibility Evaluation.
No cultural resources were located during the course of the field work in the project
area appear to be more than 50 years old. Consequently it is not germane to assess
significance under any of the criteria listed above.
Evaluation Of Effects Of The Proposed Project.
Considering the cultural resources found on the property, the development of the
inspected parcel will not have an effect on potentially significant cultural resources.
Recommendations.
Based on the archival information, field methods, the observable surface indications
and because none of the materials observed on the subject property have potential to
provide important archaeological or historical information beyond what was obtained
for this project, P.A.S.T. supports approving the sponsor's application. Although P.A.S.T.
does not endorse additional archaeological studies for this project, ground disturbing
activities on the property should not commence without authorization by the agency
archaeologist(s).
There remains the possibility that ground disturbing activities could reveal the presence
of heretofore undiscovered cultural resources. If such materials are discovered
construction activities should stop. Consultation should be initiated with the cognizant
agency archaeologist, and if applicable under ARS X41-841 et seq. the Arizona State
Museum, to assess the potential significance of any materials unearthed. Under State
law (ARS 41-§865 & X41-844) if human skeletal remains or funerary objects are
discovered on either public or private lands the Arizona State Museum should be
contacted immediately.
NOTE FOR ADOT INVOLVED PROJECTS: If previously unidentified cultural resources are encountered during
activity related to the use of this source, the contractor shall stop work immediately at that location and
shall take all reasonable steps to secure the preservation of those resources. The Engineer will contact the
ADOT Environmental Planning Group, Historic Preservation Team at 602.712.8641 and make arrangements
for the proper treatment of those resources.
LITERATURE CITED
National Park Service
1986 Guidelines for Completing National Register of Historic Places Forms. Department
of the Interior. Copies available from Bulletin No. 16. National Register of Historic Places.
Turner, R. and D. Brown
1982 Sonoran Desertscrub. In Biotic Communities of the American Southwest - United
States and Mexico, edited by D. Brown, pp. 118-121. University of Arizona for Boyce
Thompson Southwestern Arboretum, Superior, Arizona.
P.A.S.T.
Tucson,Arizona
USA
17.1n oar 1C1C
•
Rooney Ranch Parcel "A", Page 5
REPORT TABLES
Table A-1. Isolates Provenience (all UTM Zone 12)
Total isolated artifacts: Isolates per acre: <1 GPS Datum: NAD27 WGS84
ISO # Fasting Northing Kind ' Comments
a 503844 3585307 pw Single sherd shown in Fig. 1
b 504520 3585444 pw !, Single sherd shown in Fig. 1
c
d '
e
f '
g
h ! �
k
rn
(Individual Artifacts: PW=PLAINWARE;DW=DECORATED;CS=CHIPPED STONE;GS=Ground STONE; FR=FAR;SH=SHELL; OR=OTHER)
(Non-site entities: NSS=non-site artifact scatter;NSF=non-site feature
Table A-2. Table of Recorded Sites Within 1.6 km Radius (all G&SRB&M)
ASM Quad Site Numbers
BB:9 I BB:9:109, BB.9.2,BB.9.75,BB:9:3,BB:9:225,BB:9:110
1:3 1:3:10,
FF:9 FF:9:17,
Table A-3. Site Management Summary Table (all G&SRB&M)
(only required when greater than 3 sites are !ocatedl
ASM# Status 1 T/R/Section Owner- Content Eligible? Additional Work
ship or Age Recommended
P.A.S.T.
Tucson,Arizona
USA
520.825.3536
•
Rooney Ranch Parcel "A", Page 6
r.�- Oro ValleyBB:9 NW)
, ,
F� . 1 U.S.G.�. 7.� MAP
1543
W 110''58'28.361" 503.000 504.000 505.000 W 110'56'18.179"
N 32"25'20.463" r ,..,, :1 I ,. ` ",-•.... • N 32'25'20.418'
3387.000 .w.�•w�+�.tj..J...Y.ri....,.�.r L 7 ..rr4-. ..�. 0.:;,1,•:.-•••••,,f4
.. :. •• ' 3.587.000
i. , �' • • . ,.i f ....,.:::....r'•-• ▪ I
• 1'•'-‘...'
.'-. ,
,, , : . • :. •
•,.. - : :... •,,,.,, , ,, 4....... ?v..' •
a 33
!...1..'•-•i t 1, t s• '.“ -, -7-- ,.....
!...;,...,.. p- •.. i k ,:, : . „i\ji\''•0., ',.'•\ ,.. .....,';'')..r, i . , '• -• -'- .. . 4 •• .4,
t. ,S \, ..• 1▪ ,\,. /�• i �� � I r is ,Cr.• • • t,%• ••�•:t• j 'rti:
'wit{�•, %.....,i • 1 't,z �W'y.'71. �� � a`'.� 1 •�`• �, ,( �••�• '•e'.''..."..'-.....
•'�..� �� t.• /,f•• -� �' ,t' .s'i::?r�.r
I, �- S ' 1'L .t�i % ,'. .. i •L pi t ., -ii r '�1 , • .-;.4i:..i)tt•
��a///:::111 M� t ,-, �~\� ,� {^�y ' .....4 L i • 5 t '+ 1 .,..1,...-...,•-..:',.',I: ::/•^..t
3•SH6.D00 itwi.�i i j .+..--- N �, --•► ly ..it.w • .I..w.'r....«r w ter►-• �.•r w{_r �• a....IV: :::-
.: •t ., i,••, .,",....•• Y`'.. :•. , :..`k.3.58.000
t,'• f{L.�' I�:.t ` �' •!,... ; t ', , • � ',"/ •rt . � ,.:.,,A..,
; / r � ..V( +`� •f :I l� .:
•tr.:: ::R.:..•I i i• . :--: .l \,•,,t + •i. ,,n,,, ,.1 f\ I
. f'..."''''(••••V:•,- :.t• .:�.::r'r•:: :r
^i:.t •► ,, r i i,_ t• 1• i ,11 •`,.. i f , i j ,• A A..•., ++ ; t` i•,.• in•::..4� .:i:ti:::
sr ^i�`f��r� .)•♦. 1 i !J � '` ' ; .,+ • ' ... .I i t �. �'♦ �•_.J.j •i ...�,.�•:r�,.r ,. •.:.,�r�iy,r. :e
:.•�'i J7•s 1t t I tt,',..
1i - , . 3'\' `I - t ,�4 d. J• ia.,i't.i r.I.,,;. ..-:r, }'•i..: ,-,14.,f.. : • •,,,
SSU�3Y ARBA '. ..� .�, ,: ,:.::,.�'_ +.:i,.
.::,f.s..•'17::t1 :.i: ", + L .. t \i „.....,„1.8m t, �r�( it#+:•-
:. • Z{ •,: ,-f /<�.a:waalfJ t►�£,t3 ,.1
;> ` yr`-G'"° ::503,725.30M E,3,585,619.02M N,Z 12 04,521.04M E,3,585,607.26M N Z 12 ,'`":' '
!:if�la;�? ,Z�./ t �' ..•,, z.` -• y i l • / t,•'/,• ,.., ,,.8./•'t ,- •itii'i l.;,:S••',s,i
w-•`{ ,• 1` 503 727.50M E 5 :. N,Z 121 .. r i, ,':i 't..:<. :r.:'�:.I:..
•:.,� .3,58 ,518.82M -� , .,!: ��, , ,, �•••:..
t:. a'••/ .,,.. I t .•rte �7 i :,,,,i,
• >' •.: •,i;xg.,',;?.w.A.:131•i•.
11,° - ,' :ai^;==°:503 755.47M E 3 586 415.19M N Z 17 504,519.81M E,3,585,417.72M N,.Z 122?......,....:..,..,..,..,
' �� i • i .;14'...
ply W . WWW / i• t / ;;is;it:ti;sIf
t raw:' I , i it ! i ''.."(a..))....‘ ` 'i: ‘-:'`7▪”
)0 '4.1::', ..;:,...!..!.......'.."!,• .:11U!,{.y •
,w�• ,1i: . :i'i'e +s t i'• i;t' , 4 1`•• i I' " t , Y f•,t':• 1.`,�.�,,,.�( k: '.i i a,,i. a.,3,a:''•
x•4.:3 .+.:� : ‘� ( + a, ,,ast :�▪ ,
' w .L •�• £ - , -i •'• 1;,,..
.+.0" r 1. t .••.•.'../,.J,J !• ,..•'';.5teem.bPurn •, / _?'+i:....f n...�isyK.•::.•.....
'. •.�z1•••.0'.:::i.',iJ •4:,t. " = t ii ':.t �^`,, •I. .-(7' i f. .`i. Ranc �� (l •:t•r t••�' }'s•r!�Ji,:i ,.•�'••ri=V "A:•• •v + '1 l •1t )! 1t '/ i• ,. 1 ,•,'..w�3�.i,::�.. /.t• r,
:�1. :.I!�:. ;J i e y` i .. r:. :,'..�. ,:,"i:.lt':i:r: t.i;3.•T.- r/er i
...:1
,,
�!` �l .,..• -..„}-- „.2. x - ,_______,,,„.„2...,x� - _ _ ,i`: -•.„.„,,,„,....„.:,„,,........„.....„:„......,,............(
,.•
I..,r-.r } ......•.,� --;•"Y- _�_ .: .L'». �r.• � • -:.tea.z. .+117:::£: :r+�t....,
3,585,000 .. r•-r j(( y' -;' t ••013•'::�t.,,,! ,... ::1•t•..r a•, ,3.585.000
., ` •t� "a ;,a � �/ �i• +i. .� •..+ .. ::t't.t.,..i, ;i. 'fit..: •��£iti•i+W'.;.a ^�-•�' ti`
,-'' .`:1 ` •`i r• '`•1 \; '' • i'503,966.56M E,3,584,997.49M N,Z 12 J- // •N."-_'
'tzkiter-.Park- -4!
k.
a r {•i . ! ---.....,...::---t',.7
• �.l. .._.... v .ce.'y0,,
�- -
"- ] ( _ _ + '• • 1 ./.;;..;:;;;...72JJ5'\Ri:.;,� -,--4� _
'\ i• •{r-r^ t IF
,ti' .•i'i. ,•„.:,;,;•••••• :' , �t•,,,♦ � Q,i Wi�:, '/:i ; ✓ f �a ., ,
ftTyam. R ,�,hs•3 ;
,------,/- .. -,,,,......,,,,6.5;;;.... ,.....
▪ ••••
1 Sewage.. fi a a „'• ' ` '•� -.'- '•." �•
c..,,a5..c. .. ,,,.:.',;-•--;•'t *i'". 1 / .• •. .,:, •• ‘ ' 1, r. •.., . ,--, -.1,...., „ .,.. • ,
•..
1 i ;.•
/. • .• • ........, ,,- .....1,,,,,,.. ., , .. (
•
:1',.-c.:::'.7. •%.► I� '•V., t j',,,,
\ : •. ; am' •_ •t ! ,- . ..% s`+ _• j .,/it!' ,,
'`'' . . - --;:—.4-74-77-1,72=-`; t.
,,ti
;"-"7'\
3.584.0003$84.000' ! 0--*-"\'.-: - i..— omi.i,-------:4.- • •:'', i 1 .. :-. ...»- "..'
i/ "z "ce• "▪ i� i; �`,� 4• \ •....
I ! , + •
(l•mo, • • •
, . , \ ,, •2543"...
, , •, �, •fi '�• •nam ...,17-',, �` • 1 :, •� ,, .:,, "-,~ ` hJ•. • s \ . . l / •.� ,
N 32'23'30.040" • • -• - . - + -'
N 32'23'29.995
W 110~58'28.392" 503.000 504.000 505,000 W 110'56'18.254"
1927 Nath American Datum;1,000-meter U TM grid zone 12
Generated by 6igTopo(www.igage.com) 0 34 3f 1 Mile
Map compiled from USGS Quadt: Oro Valley;AZ -'
0 1000 2000 3000 5000 Feet r -:..toiN
h. :it� ... P.A.S.T.
0 0.5 1 K�omctrs
1543.113
,,..yr).
i-••--a r-- F---t F-- 3 '
PAST No. 031543 Sec. 7 T12S R14E G&SRB&M May, 03
NOTE: Due to the sensitivity of site locations, only sites within the project area are depicted on the map
Site and survey locations as well as their geometric representation and extent are approximate.
APPENDIX F
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
LEY
o o TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
0- 6)
-� Department of Public Works
{ 11000 N. La Canada Drive
Oro Valley, Arizona 85737
.: (520) 2294880 Fax (520) 2294899
•
= www.townoforovalley.com
vN°ED‘\ October 28, 2003
Andrew Smigielski, P.E.
Southwest Traffic Engineering
5025 North Central Avenue, #614
Phoenix, AZ 850121
Re: 0V9-03-03, Rooney Ranch Area Z,Final Traffic Impact Analysis
Dear Andrew:
Thankou for workingwith us in the preparation of the referenced report. We have completed our
y
review and based on our review we find the report acceptable with the following conditions:
1. The Town's First Avenue Road Improvement project will include 10-ft wide shoulders/bikes
lanes on each side of the street.Right turning vehicles can utilize these lanes I shoulders.
Therefore, northbound right turn lanes will not be required.
2. The developer shall be responsible for installing southbound left turn lanes at the First Avenue/
Lambert intersection, and at the First Avenue and the northern access/frontage road
intersection. It is recommended that the developer post in-lieu fees so that they become part of
the Town's First Avenue Road Improvement project.
3. The developer shall be responsible for the modification of the traffic signal at the intersection of
p
First Avenue and Lambert Lane.
4. The 3 acre commercial property on the south west corner of the property shall have access off
thepPro osed street opposite Lambert Lane. No direct access to First Avenue will be approved.
p p
The above shall be conditions of the PAD Amendment. If you have any questions, please call me.
Sincerely,
Craig Civalier '.E.
Development Review Division Manager
XC: R. Longaker
B. Nodine
B. Jansen
P.Nzomo
ROONEY RANCH
FIRST AVENUE/LAMBERT LANE
FINAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
PREPARED FOR
WLB GROUP
i 7 /
4.-7—Arc—MW;_
(4%.,...
/PI'
1:; 32339 i
• i ANDREW R.
SMIGIELSKIcit
e signed ..o•
4,yrzoNA,u.s.-
PREPARED BY
Southwest Traffic Engineering
5025 North Central Avenue, #614
Phoenix, AZ 85012
20, October 2003
Table of Contents
Executive Summary 2
Project Description 4
Study Methodology 4
Existing Conditions 6
Existing Traffic Data 8
Trip Generation 8
Trip Distribution & Assignment 12
Access 12
Existing Traffic Operations 17
Future Traffic Operations Without Project 19
Warrant Analysis 20
Future Traffic Operations With Project 24
Turn Lane Analysis 24
Traffic Mitigation 28
Internal Circulation 28
Synchro Analysis 29
Conclusion 30
Table of Figures
Figure 1 —Vicinity Map 5
Figure 2—Existing Daily Traffic Volumes_ 9
Figure 3 —Existing Weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 10
Figure 4 --Dwelling Unit Weekday Peak Hour Trip Distribution_ — 13
Figure 5 —Specialty Retail Weekday Peak Hour Trip Distribution 14
Figure 6—Dwelling Unit Weekday Peak Hour Trip Assignment 15
Figure 7-- Specialty Retail Weekday Peak Hour Trip Assignment 16
Figure 8—2005 Weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Without Project 21
Figure 9--2005 Weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes With Project 25
Final Traffic Impact Analysis 0
Rooney Ranch,First Avenue/Lambert Lane
List of Tables
Table 1 --Weekday Project Site Generated Trips 11
Table 2 —Weekday Frontage Road Homes Generated Trips 11
Table 3—Weekday Specialty Retail Center Generated Trips 12
Table 4 - Level of Service Criteria—Signalized Intersections 17
Table 5 -Level of Service Criteria—Unsignalized Intersections 18
Table 6—Existing Peak Hour Levels of Service 19
Table 7—2005 Peak Hour Levels of Service Without Project 20
Table 8—First Avenue/Lambert Lane Warrant Analysis Without Project 23
Table 9—First Avenue/Naranja Drive Warrant Analysis Without Project 23
Table 10—2005 Peak Hour Levels of Service With Project 26
Table 11 - Recommended Turn Treatments With Project 26
Table 12—Calculated Turn Lane Storage Lengths 27
Table 13 —PM Peak Hour SimTraffic LOS Coordination Analysis
First Avenue—Oracle Road to Naranja Drive 30
Appendix ! , esCr )
Traffic Counts
Trip Generation Calculations
Trip Distribution Calculations
Capacity Calculations
Warrant Analysis
Turn Lane Calculations
Synchro Analysis
Final Traffic Impact Analysis 1
Rooney Ranch,First Avenue/Lambert Lane
FINAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
ROONEY RANCH
FIRST AVENUE/LAMBERT LANE
Executive Summary
The purpose of this traffic study is to evaluate the current and future transportation
system within the project study area surrounding the site without and with the project,
analyze traffic operations at the intersections of First Avenue/Oracle Road, First
Avenue/Home Deport-Fry's Driveway, First Avenue/Lambert Lane, and First
Avenue/Naranja Drive, along with the project driveways located along First Avenue
without and with the project.
Existing and Future Traffic Data Without Project
Various traffic counts were taken in several locations along First Avenue, Lambert Lane,
and Naranja Drive adjacent to the project site. The traffic counts included turning
movement and 24-hour volume traffic counts during the weekday AM and PM peak
hours.
The existing intersections of First Avenue/Oracle Road, First Avenue/Home Deport-Fry's
Driveway, First Avenue/Lambert Lane, and First Avenue/Naranja Drive without the
project were evaluated for existing and future levels of service.
The intersections of First Avenue/Oracle Road and First Avenue/Lambert Lane currently
operate at an inadequate LOS F during the PM and AM peak hours, respectively. With
the completion of the First Avenue Improvement Project, Oracle Road Improvement
District Project, and the Pusch View Lane extension by the Town of Oro Valley, all of
the intersections will operate at an adequate LOS C or better in 2005 without the project.
Future Traffic Data With Project
In order to assess the impacts of the project on future traffic operations, levels of service
were calculated for each intersection for 2005 with the new project. The addition of site-
generated trips will not affect the level of service of the intersections in the study area.
All of the study intersections will operate at an adequate level of service C or better
during the weekday peak hours.
Due to concerns regarding vehicles leaving the proposed right in/right out intersection,
approximately 900 feet north of Lambert Lane, traveling north approximately 200 feet
y
and making a northbound U-turn at a future median break along First Avenue, the Town
of Oro Valley has requested the relocation of the proposed second driveway serving the
project site. The second intersection would be located approximately 1,100 feet north of
the intersection of First Avenue/Lambert Lane at the intersection of First
Avenue/Frontage Road, the proposed future median break. This driveway would have
full turning movement capabilities. Both options will operate at an adequate level of
service with the project. However, this driveway location may not be possible due to
Final Traffic Impact Analysis 2
Rooney Ranch, First Avenue/Lambert Lane
drainage, 404 permit, and onsite project layout issues. If the second driveway cannot be
relocated to the Town's suggested location, it is recommended that the future median
break be signed 'NO U-turns'.
Warrant Analysis
The intersections of First Avenue/Lambert Lane and First Avenue/Naranja Drive both
meet traffic signal warrants for current conditions and future conditions without the
project in 2003 and 2005. These results agree with the results in the First Avenue
" Lambert Lane to Tangerine Road Final Traffic Engineering Report, September 2001,
which found traffic signals were also warranted at each of the intersections analyzed.
Traffic Mitigations
While all of the intersections will operate at an adequate level of service during the
weekday peak hours in 2005 without and with the project, and with the Town of Oro
Valley improvements to First Avenue yet to be completed, it is still possible to propose
mitigation measures, or improvements for the First Avenue corridor adjacent to the
project site to further improve safety.
Mitigation measures at the intersection of First Avenue/Naranja Drive will provide for
improved operation and safety at the intersection. Improvements include traffic signal
removal from the current First Avenue Improvement design plans.
Synchro Analysis
All of the intersections in the study area will operate adequately as a coordinated system
during the 2005 PM Peak hour with a 90 second cycle length without and with the
project.
Recommendations
Right turn lanes into the project site, with a minimum of 100 feet of storage, should be
constructed at the intersections of First Avenue/Lambert Lane, the project driveway
located along First Avenue, north of Lambert Lane, and First Avenue/Commercial
Driveway #1. The southbound left turn lane on First Avenue at Lambert Lane should
provide a minimum of 150 feet of storage length.
The addition of the proposed new traffic signal at the 'T' intersection of First
Avenue/Naranja Drive may increase the possibility of rear-end accidents due to the
downhill southbound approach. With the removal of the proposed traffic signal, this
situation would be limited. Capacity analysis for a STOP controlled `T intersection at
First Avenue/Naranja Drive shows this intersection will operate at an adequate LOS C or
MID better during the 2005 weekday peak hours with the addition of the project. Northbound
and southbound traffic would be free flow, while the eastbound approach would be STOP
controlled.
Final Traffic Impact Analysis 3
Rooney Ranch,First Avenue/Lambert Lane
FINAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
ROONEY RANCH
FIRST AVENUE/LAMBERT LANE
Project Description
Canada del Oro Partners propose to construct a new single-family residence development
on the undeveloped east side of First Avenue between Lambert Lane and Naranja Drive
in Oro Valley, Arizona. The site is located as shown in Figure 1. The project would
consist of 159 new single-family homes on approximately 77 acres. Access to the site
will be from two intersections along First Avenue. The homes in Rooney Ranch are
scheduled for occupation in 2005.
While not specifically part of this project, and also per the Town of Oro Valley's
direction, the site plan also includes an area for a potential specialty retail center that may
be constructed in the future by a separate development.
The purpose of this traffic impact analysis is to:
• Evaluate the current and future transportation system within the area surrounding the
site.
• Estimate the traffic generation associated with the project and assign that traffic to the
roadway system.
• Analyze traffic operations at the intersections of First Avenue/Oracle Road, First
Avenue/Home Deport-Fry's Driveway, First Avenue/Lambert Lane, and First
Avenue/Naranja Drive, along with the right in/right out project driveway located
along First Avenue, north of Lambert Lane without and with the project.
• Perform a traffic signal warrant study for the intersections of First Avenue/Lambert
Lane and First Avenue/Naranja Drive.
• Provide a synchronization analysis of the First Avenue corridor adjacent to the project
without and with the project.
The author of this report is a registered professional engineer (civil) in the State of
Arizona having specific expertise and experience in the preparation of traffic impact
analyses.
Study Methodolocry
In order to analyze and evaluate the potential traffic impacts of the proposed Rooney
Ranch Development, the following tasks were undertaken:
• Field observation of the proposed site and surrounding area was conducted to
evaluate the existing physical and operational characteristics of the adjacent
roadway network.
Final Traffic Impact Analysis 4
Rooney Ranch,First Avenue/Lambert Lane
1mCL"et*ft twine taw erg 411110101111.1Mhd elOg0 4.6100'.1tr1.11t011le,,
I
r.
in in
M' Z gW>- H'wU w a. < % TZ o o x�w\,3i it �;) O Q 8U w
t.to Z a— a -J
Fi g
a. ()
i I! 4:**,•. ''J Q >▪ "' Q_ co
� o o a = z• �v°0 Z _ o
Z g.
s N p Q O O C/) < Q N
����sal� z, g� 0 Z° ? 21 Q o f O m m g 0 m• L..Za. — Q
'�• II Q y��C14111
ii • Rai8j O 12Z jR "�
>"
-
El 0, a_
F6 z
Z °; Wz < o �
°Q o o $
Z0 Q
�' f ` +Y i' .� ; S��� \ `;• .t„,
.O O
.`',(' a a��9#_'attrd O ji" jl :),•:, 1 •_.,/ •`, I. - !1i \
.,..;\•, ",+r'•"� ,�`tir•T%sa•7);;:,�f(•'gi�ftt (�G c.s t �' �• \\ • •:;...‘\,,:i. �r • '1� '\ U N _
+till 1r•.--; ;',..
1444A1 0..
+• 'j 71F �! �+.qt„�'ti�r'1i �L=i+.i •\i. ('\ f ..�.'}�``\ \ ��`• i,`� j �` a ,O
/ `L! iI''.�it .. 1 `:4`••?.,•':::µi!},'1 • I'.�\V `•\j..:
,`\� •�, •',,,
i.'.2.\•W,/•''''''....!,2-' .1• yty� �,• s,.•;:r„ `�;1 `\ •.-.•�,., > \\ .��\::,\,f. li � ..-'-'-'-',;"..-.'i"-:.-'-
. `: 1'C'".'_•,:•+•�'f`tf•.,a►,:.Y��!t:.'".I��,rr'I! ,..✓Wj� 1 \' <•,a\'••4; +
r �«•,,,;/�,_''`r.svr:.,.. •.;�.,r,.t;' •-t.' � '1• /`••••" •�'� �,\. ,•:�t� � .�V A '• ( er:� \,J `\ \N..
' •.T t 1 ,, ,\ /'.,' ...:--•'' 1, ,,�, f 2,r ,..77,•:. \- '.•..\ ,..••` \jS !t!':) • \ ,,, 1 0 x.
a istR;L'`; /''',..‘'T-7
•T-7 -7-,-- ` .•. .."'r�ii�- „..,,,,---,7,/•. .i `\ �s11, 4`--,\ ti• \,•\ •�,.i' .\ '�\. `• 1n•\„/ ,�\t • ;;\.
•
•
f/ "'f• .,.r,..,.r -` • .a .�.��, �•�. .,• -`•. > ; :4 ` 1� , t ..:,... :-......1,.
7..,, �_ k...,..�_.i p,1ti`� }\ }'
7 ti .. ... /!. /'• j l` /i �1;4,:l `.-\\ <,,,,,:`\\••
,,,�,,,'A` ..�� tis• 1.\/....�.., `�,•
• j
.,,r ) • -\---_.,-.4• 1f� \_ `•'A t `\ .•mar • %w.. Sii'T. C^ > ; i —..„,,,..0,;,:r.=..
.J /� \ •. <!"l i ` is .‘,.,,
S
W;u
i f-..T T. ;...,.rte, \s -\""\ .. ..• � \ � ''� � •
7,--,, .'''..---Z.1--tgitliaWF.-- 'Cr.,
/1..% J 1,',4111'` ao // , r / / 1 i\�4, \� .��+�• \` '\.\\,\ '\\ ,')a,, , ..i 1, .,.-.,,tet-
T i • > i�,it 3:-71,,";, i r %-r-r7---/-'1'`•: ♦ !—,7 : '\t '1 `2%-:,,''''. ••
.%.,\%,.;8,...,....i,,.)
'''' �, t ,`T
'�+, a f I -.w r !1 ! .i ani g 1(i i' i N 1`;,;•\!,,/ ,.. ` \~'%‘,:\S • \.•�t'\�`t> , y ,, ;••.;,L..1
•\,r .-
! ) -:: ,... t .� h I o� `,\,
i; y `�j 1 `, .,,,J t /"vi'\` t \• v:M.1
i ii /'' '''.; I/
SI 1/ ' : , f./...,:.:../:..1/.._.!°,2; •�'•� . /• /•' \,r `• �, �•\•..: / i..' ,--,:,,,,0%',•-',.,,
i.O ,•- _ `�
4),.
�" �.� /�i 15,i I< "�Lff:`• / `, (' \•p ''` i .�St]f• ••�1 /~�.\,\ \ ._.? i• r„ •� O \' � •��`i ,.,
•
:.:::\u. `r,. 4.. �,1 '". .` ..!"! r•
_..... :._ ;.� ..�; fan\ /'n % `~ �• '. ? ,T• , ,t _ ^J
•
•
;'. e";t9 ' �'• ... r `. Vii.►:•.�.. .... .,. L, i :,,,` `'`"",;�+ ..�Y' \y-.,:.;-,--.!--,..\,
�,.i r,\
est. •,` .. r.rn:;s•'- •�`''•4,••-.1.,_ •---re.-
r ''. ^. , •/. .\ , • a
nfNVl -"'1 P.�'.!Sonal-►'�►a••iy,,,i., .'ytfi t` >a \ , �!',.� !'`i., •K"f•b'.;.) ` �,` t_.. '' w •\,`•.�H.I�`
.'MSI�`t•t-1}t•;�. 94i
7'.".`\\.'„,i,,-•
t-. \ —7•77:,;•...--:----\"\'''
.i.,. .l"\'''i'.. ; ..`./.i • i '\ t / ^ \ '�'\; •., ;"...L`♦
. \t‘,
4ispa
li, ‘i,...4,,,,,--c-,,„ow.'Y' • •• �•�."' `t•�,_•:'''''''.5-`...,,e--/...-:•'•:).-.7\., \N.,\,. . •-.-- ; \ .... (-24:;;\
.•QI+'r /'J�.,, ,^, ,: i ..w /'t , w.- /•y \� I' /N 1� .s,, 1' V vdQ+.1+ pfi,/.s' •t..Y :: M.ti `,'_;: �, � �.T.. .7.......',,..4:•,,e2'..,•:',;\• , ..i.'.+.r:..4.:1':�..•�r.r. O_ 'K. (V:\ i`•,4,\\` !`� ../ .�`.
t /� .tom, I 1 / I ,--„7::::,:r'.-7';'---,--.---
/w� w .,....7,5?,;.,,,,,,./4/.2
.�.�.4`� �O •�•\ f ,Y•W ��•.._..‘ ."'� \ `\ I
�\ ti r•'y 1 _ f '!� �. /. 1 .f..f�. r/..�. 1A'�/' / ' ':Ii_.,� a` \� J \_•.
` I { it f j t •f ., A.- •/ h i- w '� ' Y /prof^1 , •\` � ),; /'' �,
yu '''‘'..•
t .fin,:' },c,i,„:,,,,,,„,.....:,,,:,,,,,,,,,,,,:„t • �fii•a .wI 1; ( ,°jp. , " . .. 4 ii' •�,..^'.'. ��s � t�\•..r.._ �,... ,\� !
:,,,,' � .••••'''''''s.
, `� ,l: ;l 1'i ri A� `\~y :> ••,� i ••.f.••4. .• /:' --�i• 4 sae .\\
',T.,-,,..
,../..--..,••,,„:,,E,-:',;.-, -,---,. ,I.,:, ..,-- ..,„...,:.,::-7..-,--:-. ..„ „•-,-,,,,,:s.-..,-,-,-,. -;......., -
..,11 ...._ :::-.:7*-.,:::,,,,----<,-.-: ‘,. ./41,--- •••/...---,..11---..-..-,-z------ --- --. --. ,..-„-_:,-••••, •—",'-'4,416111 ,ri ''NIA.' ,,....!", g
•
�. R, '�`� \`� t •'fib,s ✓ . /_.__ :'si L t ii;'), >~ h
t tt'+ i•iii,•„ t L,v. _ <.-Mi�7.• _�_„_'.r..._.•"'..\:-..-----
�, :.,.. i�' -�� Y . ri:. s:' + ,,^ •,,,,
�f ., r q .1 c,J .4r. •y 20;,,,::9-.,-,-,--4,41� ; •i,' •, '••�. V A •le•nl�� � "'/.2'1 ' . \t✓�t; ../�'•`P.
..•• S/ .:•,.,.:.,,,,,,,,,,' ,L"i1^ ter. •' o • ▪ ,,'••,-•-•-•• .y.4 ;t ..R• • '-',--""•,•::•''-'• •••
-',-.�, •,..i•:,:i'.••+yHL•••y.^''�,'�'�Q••if Y,.' 3 i ,\... 'f..
/H'�►•,. . .1 •�"1,'y. . ••• 1�• t;,i n.t F, •,•,.,,,,,,, �. /r::;:r,`�\w`\ •'r':``` ,_:.4�•.�,":.�..., �,�...... \,-` , ]�.Mya• /:!�� •�4,`{l2iy tt" �� ,� .. • H
.\•
,. �i ..'7,-t-.
t+ ',4 I• ., i .,Z \ ;.,'• ;I 1•��y, •\ `\ �. •8��`i1.%'i�A'•-It-?tF-attAn S''..,.}' , •
1 7 1t ���' '.�;` •},;i i.. ,. .r;:.a i•i'',f-1,..4'
.j•1n;'• ••.�\..`•.-.�.-;'�' -tom.•t,,.�I.., ..,i' —``t ,�[, p�(' ; .�1 4f �\
(7 •
•:- .:.:.s:: ,J /..,v/.4 1 /,•,/ '•if.. _ • , 7.r: .S i.i . 'P�....- 1.>\ :�� .� :•'+^'M•• i} S�.i!`iyY� \� •
:1( -••�11l .^ .1t':...-,+• ♦It i '� \' ,r ,' iT.:='�:''` \ ``\•t• - ,..-!..•eSr <s
S 1 ).;•iki.4•Iii•e *,41,',,c,,-:•k'f.!..-,,,;•,',-•,,.••:;)'1"
_ '9t 1:;/'C •f.:.. •O. •''.••'-....r ,�',•� �,�` 1i 'w...y.,s,:• e�•+� 1� h M >.._ \'v I ��la��
i,} ;�,,. ! i i:., , �y\m\ \,..�-K':t ? ,, �., '�� st•�`,.�• :� � 8
":;, \ -•. 1 , � •,� ,1,.') f•L.! \`COJ f:c.ts�' �I _,\ �” •n�► :U "r. \\.\7' i .,. .� ,,� I ,,it` � .��(. t'v,._'` /t1,.i1, 1 (\"• '• •1• Zt•, \.`, �Ih:'S:.`b` .,♦y%+P•�• .�•$��IL'•'rlr�rL.••y���C �y ♦ �.`_ • r... ',t .e ,( ( _ r ' (�'f'. 4 t,Y.`' it • :•\ , j 'M° a...:� i._�'h�'•%IC� i
\_'4?:-,41./-7
/ •: ,' ''� 'i. �h,';i :'b_}.s s"� R� ,\,�..,:j,--•-\--7:17,7--1,11.'•••� ;1\`` ,Y •\\.,:,),\‘2'‘
.) •~�+d','4: .-�'t`, t:t ��
i _,% • /: i I 1 �i• '' ,sYs,i..�• . d y._ •�� ,"�' m++br _J.la� :rt 6'
''' (-1:
..._•-: • s r l •,• �'+r•i, ..7 ..,\'.'`, \'^'''1 r,. 1.. •,,, ,'*':,1�ist�f•'w}t _. ,11,j,'+`,, �'I'Os'. vt,,.,` � -
j^�S S __ t': 1 c r •r. :� . � '\.. .:t- 'k. •'yC,+ :�' '+: • =Y� � �'ia. V � o! -. •
` � �1. '� SC gy�`� �:.`e •,f t� i.. �`:r:,'._,- `.x •� 1. w;:`3 ii: •� � a.�y. • �„ �. .}� .�. 1D
(.1 ;C,•J\, T;��,�j `l, ,•r> e- g i't-.e •1 t�'L'�ii:-1 '\"-•+c' k:1.� yy�,
-_Ir j'"�:.~s' :t Z-�t.:• �\\' !'��li:,,t:{�}� ?: '�jlBf:L "� �!♦ sI•'�,nny1, -„;:::.��G����\�'f� •'If.'t,L'�itiC•�,•,:\ 1 �i���LLJ`O,e�'`ti �.
�•
(4 ,1•`� .•r”�r;'�'J .T,;f'I �' ...• +GIRE7' t�i�. >w + i+r. ,.\ �'%.11.-
�, a
�\ � �'...11rs+wt:, �r ,�•.,e,{.•7 7, l;_... Rt•t�, �\/ r ��" ` � v�• �.Q:.� .
.."�:/;,-,::•-''..- :19.-.•,t t'i•!!��,a �`' rn.•'Q spS I, fNW.j''`..�ji: �„r•, ,.o'+:++'•[I' t•/i A t (� ,
/ ,,�1(• �\ \, lilitt,
_ ' T+:+"'r"•`•::1 2nK'`•�>ICs AI•1 '.,Itrra.i +. 1►j �• t\\� ' '„'.. \` ,*. rrn+ +L\. t.,;, -isisr.,,� -(Y ��..t-=A... t , 1'1 t ' .A ..E. i
!u• !1 ,. ,�aadl,•,,._ f�]� ,.••4..aL:, ... '' ~ -•+ ` '1, 1i} .• - �`W..,,/.f - .tt rf .',•A.. tr'••, :' �sz:,•,•:` fir•.-,,/,V•, y�MMF yI {} \ ,..;•�,a`` yr -iiCt'4 :1 = :...,..l/r �,� �I'5.,/,/,.i-•+:t r•/' \•:� :' Ate -."' �' ,,, l' fd�y,� I': ,,Ie
__. •;� �''.y /. t-1.....,:-...C.,,_'• i,..1•'`,'^' + /''. _r"'6`�'ypz�.. .-•'-'•''••'.:'.'•'
9, .tom _/1 7+ tps� � /
.' �-_ ,.'• f MELti�ys'Jy°1y.ta's xY `' t;,-.,s S�!: s�. p °�" :, `;•..•/."\[."°' €^ii '"`t ~••.�I�c %/,r_..�.....;
7 "'St -i''A•_``•1".'�77_VV�`---:._---<�'-.4 �7 .,,k ! • ...0,A '/•t . e,t ''s ti.•77•'•�``, -•vt't n, 'mi.4 it, _' ,/ ,.
/� �i,I Pj: "�' v,:/ `Mr„1 •.•',y,"� f -..,.:.../.P.'..;,':::...63-,
s• 'L-, '� \ , '•, „��Y,�/l� ��-f I� ,�'�.y,
[`1 �' •� /-�j'�,,' •I ..• .s�.���''f. •�•,t \'(d+�' • �,!.�' }�'tt-j......,,,‘
l t !!bs•Wls,, ••• �, ',fiq�s` r ' D`1G� ••' =J' ^' '' ��: 5 ,ti ,, , Com., 1 f 4'vimI:M'�'.. ". ^�—/ I+'.l(, \ ' 'r:�� K 1,� ''tt.4:;:4'` S „''� t\"1','A m('1 i.:; 1,1:t ri' i ii .✓/k✓` ,'i. ill
E.; , •<, ,,4 ` 1�,�@ �y � %� •,.. `t}'.IS ��, ......-...:,......._.-•••. • t •\. ▪ �•� / %sr,., /'""� f -\1D;o
,l -\i''',
�. .' I v '• r 5\!.1.4. 1..,'•''L
' J' ' i !\,•.�•, ••\\�\ ( ✓� /l„•1 y�,�i,,.•..•., .�, VV O� "•
71
4-7
"---- 41‘. iiii;iii*
/ ; ' ��,' .17:','','f,��`` 1, y ' r ;.W''eFR'',!''° eL"••C•. \`4 S`,;; r' t� I!`{ ��;,j/'rte S -,C•
.. ,•\-_,-. j�,\,`�,, / ...+:•�� ,1 ,.l•,:F, :e \ ,11I,,,Fpl '' •'Y't ,,'. :i,' +..?",.�•• ^ c, s�e-:---' /it//`��/ ti^ ,otr
�� '�;l . t /! .`i-...s ,-.••, 4 .; ,t,. • ^>..`.il'r' ` z7'._. • � 7..
\�,:... °, ,ii ;�✓,� '.s.... `�,ii Ii='k1tj i i 1 I: 1' j „�,�,+`� Y''�yy ' \, t l•�lt�^ i '%'.i• .,)..�y.r • ,
=4'fin,; ';1•1,••
-• ~\: ' 71 S ( �\ ` �• f.. '1, a�Fr�,`31 >///, � Si 1�/{7 •'\._� r� 4�
.. ''f� �, `••: X11''it \\ `',: •%/J : tF '1!•' •')1I req T t :ii•si''1 ,/r f•-••";7'
:. . _
>,! Y `. '��i \\ .• i ! /' l7't•(.. ����� '1h\i►. SS: • '.,,,•_-'�� { ., i .,,,-,,'.,,.--,-::.::z
-7• %•r �-
\,,;•'\ •''N ': 1 t",'`1:",',2',,15i11!) •;iv, @ , /vY' \V., :Z.:-.• '!e. •1:t•,••+ ;•1� 1)':7 '/,,.,,•+r . �� -::
;\:. \i\\�i�!..:`/..%,.',1'1,,,,,,•,.\i4\`}{{{'^`:\,�'`Itt 1JJ)11 '/��, VV..•�• �% ��lls\ 1�.���•vv"�'q��._` Glt•. - ��j. .. •,,,!:-.7,...,,''.::,,,,,,,,,-„'.Y.'�•
-.' ',S i//j.,U l\\,':1'1:",;!//4,,,
.i/,1 1 t + 7�- 1 r. ,c la i,•int,L}f.]i. '=1• �. • ^
'() f{!. : ,, if! li,i,iittit i. ..;;;'n-.,:\•:1;
//`• ' ;: A,;s,-......t.,... _, ,-,74.).- .:C , J {IrNM,�r•
,•;/„,,111.1,
;/:,111.1 , s.'f•", -. � r
/,j 1 1 /:,"-;',;<...'-:;,.
, f r i` ,\ ` , 1,•,:-.---2'.-.,&-
•,' .... c"....,1
': om\•. ---.-=.''A'-/„/•,,,4,-,•:
.`u�r, d,Tif .,,.../..-::::;:-",,;- ,7•(-
• Reviews of the First Avenue Lambert Lane to Tangerine Road Final Traffic
Engineering Report, September 2001, Traffic Impact Study for the Oro Valley
Town Center Development, April 2002, Rooney Ranch Parcel A, Vehicular
Access and Internal Circulation Assessment, May 2003, and the Property Owner
Meeting for Oracle Road Improvement District Meeting Presentation, May 2003,
were performed.
• A review of the latest available (2001 and 2001) Average Daily Traffic (ADT)
volumes on First Avenue obtained from the Pima Association of Governments.
• Site traffic volumes generated by the proposed site were calculated using the
Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 6th Edition,
1997. ^�
• Trip distribution assignments were made and used to assign the site traffic to the
site access points and the primary roadways within the project study limits.
• Capacity analyses were performed for the existing conditions and future
conditions without and with the project based on an opening year of 2005.
• The intersections were analyzed using the methodology presented in the 2000
Highway Capacity Manual (HCM).
• Traffic Signal Warrant Evaluations were performed for the intersections of First
Avenue/Lambert Lane and First Avenue/Naranja Drive. The methodology
presented in the Millennium Edition of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control
Devices (MUTCD) was used to perform the Signal Warrant Analyses.
• A turn lane analysis was performed to determine if right/left turn lanes would be
required at the site access points and the appropriate lengths for such lanes.
• Using the computer program Synchro 5, a Synchro/SimTraflc analysis was
performed to determine the level of operation of the First Avenue corridor
between Naranja Drive and Oracle Road.
Existing Conditions
The study location includes the signalized intersections of First Avenue/Oracle Road and
First Avenue/Lambert Lane and the un-signalized intersections of First Avenue/Home
Depot-Frys Driveway and First Avenue/Naranja Drive, along with an un-signalized right
in/right out driveway on First Avenue, north of Lambert Lane that will serve the site.
While First Avenue, Lambert Lane, and Naranja Drive are designated as arterial streets in
Oro Valley, typical arterial roadway sections have not been constructed completely along
the project site. All of these streets are two-lane roadways, which widen at their
respective intersections to three-lane roadways to offer additional auxiliary lanes. There
are no medians, sidewalks, curb or gutter located along all of these roads adjacent to the
project site. Bike lanes are provided on the east and west side of First Avenue. Both
Lambert Lane and Naranja Drive have speed limits posted at 45 miles per hour (MPH),
while First Avenue is posted at 40 MPH.
The Canada Del Oro (CDO) Wash Bridge is located east of Lambert Lane on First
Avenue. The bridge carries a two-lane roadway over the CDO Wash. South of the
Final Traffic Impact Analysis 6
Rooney Ranch,First Avenue/Lambert Lane
bridge on First Avenue, a series of raised medians are located along First Avenue to limit
vehicle conflict points between First Avenue and the 5 driveways that serve the Home
Depot and Fry's Shopping Centers on both sides of First Avenue.
The signalized intersection of First Avenue/Oracle Road currently has protected only lag
left turnp hasing for the northbound and southbound approaches on Oracle Road.
Northbound and southbound traffic on Oracle Road is provided with an exclusive left
Ei turn lane and two through lanes and an exclusive right turn lane. Bike lanes are provided
on both sides of Oracle Road. Northbound/southbound traffic on Oracle Road is also
separated bya raised median. The east side of the intersection is currently undeveloped,
p
E
while the west side is fully developed. The eastbound approach on First Avenue to the
intersection is provided with an exclusive left turn lane, one through lane, and an
;r...;E .: exclusive right turn lane. Westbound traffic on First Avenue offers an exclusive left turn
e:
lane and a shared through/right turn lane. Eastbound traffic on First Avenue also has
protected eastbound to southbound right turn phasing in coordination with the left turn
phasing on Oracle Road.
The offset intersection of First Avenue/Home Depot-Fry's Driveway is an un-signalized
intersection controlled by STOP signs on the northbound/Southbound approaches. The
northbound approach provides for an exclusive left turn lane into the Fry's Center, an
exclusive through lane, and an exclusive right turn lane into the Home Depot Center.
Southbound traffic is provided with a shared through/right turn. While the eastbound
am. approach exiting the Fry's Center offers an exclusive left turn lane and exclusive left turn
lane, vehicles exiting the Home Depot Center can only complete a right turn only
movement. This intersection is located approximately 450 feet north of Oracle Road.
While both sides of the intersection are developed, curb, gutter and sidewalk have not
WIN been constructed along both sides of First Avenue.
First Avenue/Lambert Lane is a signalized 'T' intersection, which extends to the west.
The northbound approaches offers an exclusive left turn lane and one through lane,
whereas the southbound approach provides a shared through/right turn lane. Eastbound
C, traffic on Lambert Lane, approaching First Avenue, is provided with an exclusive left
turn lane and exclusive right turn lane. There is no sidewalk, curb or gutter on any of the
legs of the intersection, however, pedestrian crosswalks are located across the west and
north legs of the intersection. The intersection of First Avenue/Lambert Lane is located
approximately 1,980 feet north of Oracle Road. The traffic signal at this intersection is
fully actuated with northbound lag left turn phasing that runs in conjunction with
F eastbound protected right turn phasing.
The un-signalized 'T intersection of First Avenue/Naranja Drive is controlled by a STOP
sip on the eastbound approach and is located approximately 3,920 feet north of Lambert
Lane. The northbound approach provides for an exclusive left turn lane and through lane,
while the southbound approach offers an exclusive through lane and an exclusive right
turn lane. An exclusive left turn lane and exclusive right turn lane is provided for the
eastbound approach. No sidewalks, curb, or gutter are located at the intersection. The
Final Traffic Impact Analysis 7
Rooney Ranch,First Avenue/Lambert Lane
existingsouthbound approach to the intersection is downhill at an approximate 5% grade
pp
per Town of Oro Valley First Avenue roadway plans.
Examination of entering sight distances at the project's access drives onto First Avenue
shows that sight distances are adequate.
Existing Traffic Data
In order to form a basis for analysis of the project impacts, weekday AM and PM peak
hour turning movement--counts were conducted at the intersections of First
Avenue/Oracle Road, First Avenue/Home Deport-Fry's Driveway, First Avenue/Lambert
Lane, and First Avenue/Naranja Drive per the direction of the Town of Oro Valley.
In addition to these turning movement counts, weekday 24-hour approach traffic counts
were completed at the intersections of First Avenue/Lambert Lane and First
Avenue/Naranj a Drive.
The weekday turning movement counts were conducted from 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM and
4:00 PM to 6:00 PM. All of the traffic counts were conducted in September 2003. The
peak hours for each intersection were found to be slightly different in their respective
time ranges.
The existing daily and weekday AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes are shown in
Figures 2 and 3. The complete traffic volume summaries can be found in the Appendix.
Due to expected extremely low peak hour traffic volumes, turning movement counts were
not completed at the intersection of First Avenue and the First Avenue Frontage Road
p
located north of Lambert Lane. This Frontage Road serves five homes. Trip Generation
was calculated for this intersection using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE)
publication TripGeneration, 6th Edition, 1997, as shown in the following section of this
report. Trips were assigned to the intersection based on existing traffic patterns in the
area.
Trip Generation
Trip generation for the project was developed utilizing nationally agreed upon data
contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) publication Trip Generation,
6th Edition, 1997. So as to provide analysis for the full build-out of the project, trip
generation was estimated for the construction of 159 single-family residential homes
based on ITE Land Use Code 210, Single —Family Detached Housing. The result is the
expected weekdaytripgeneration for the new Rooney Ranch Development as shown in
p
Table 1.
Final Traffic Impact Analysis 8
Rooney Ranch,First Avenue/Lambert Lane
a)
= A
a) N
Q
.r
0
.,
1,
I_Ix Weekday Traffic Volume
3,940 --P. Naranja Drive
t
0
M
Project Site
0
0o
1 '/'
r
I
Lambert Lane
4.810 ----
f
`
N ar
0
I / iz,
4.t.5) e
ic, .,t7
cs-N
I
1.
(-r,i
I
:.: -
II
Y
Final Traffic Impact Analysis Existing Weekday Traffic Volumes
Rooney Ranch (vehicles per day)
Figure 2
a)
N
.,_
,..,..
00M
M
00 N
['� [__
41 1 xx AM Peak Hour
89 73 --i 41 t Naranj a Drive (xx)PM Peak Hour
(136)233 -- s. go
N
0
o,
Project Site
41 1
Frontage Road -- --
(1) I --*
(1)2
. o 0
.
, 00
M Q,
r
Lambert Lane
1 _A�
C )32 1 t
(287)375 —�
CI P c'E',
M N
M o0
IE sb
/ e? N.
ic.IE
o o'`
4c) e
(s
rr r.,
J-,b s
C ./..„)
0, .›
...?„.
.‹.) ? rser 4.
..,) \ ,2,-N., e\°-'' c;C.
, ::':.::: -
E ,„,,,,e<\,\,(44
,_ , „/
Q6.- 6) jvc/ ''''
X 6446 N::41
o�(a-
"4 7
.) , t
P cs,
f,-,
, -e -,
.,,, t ev tt
r, ,._
4 ''' _.-.
` Final Traffic Impact Analysis Existing Weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
V
Rooney Ranch (vehicles per hour)
Figure 3
011
1111
Table 1 —Weekday Project Site Generated Trips
Trips
Tune a eripd . Weekday
Average Daily, Inbound(vpd) 761
Average Daily,Outbound(vpd) 761
Total Daily 1522
AM Peak Hour,Inbound(vph) 30
AM Peak Hour,Outbound(vph) 90
Total AM Peak 120
PM Peak Hour, Inbound(vph) 103
PM Peak Hour, Outbound(vph) 58
Total AM Peak, 161
vpd-vehicles per day, vph-vehicles per hour
As mentionedp reviously, trip generation for the five homes served by the intersection of
First Avenue/Frontage Road, north of Lambert Lane was also completed. In order to
obtain peak hour turning movement traffic counts at this intersection, trip generation was
estimated for the existing five single-family residential homes based on ITE Land Use
Code 210, Single —Family Detached Housing. The result is the expected weekday trip
generation for the existing five homes as shown in Table 2. The complete trip generation
calculations can be found in the Appendix.
Table 2—Weekday Frontage Road Homes Generated Trips
Trips
Time;Period Weekday
Average Daily, Inbound(vpd) 24
Average Daily, Outbound(vpd) 24
Total Daily 48
AM Peak Hour,Inbound(vph) 1
AM Peak Hour, Outbound(vph) 3
Total AM Peak 4
PM Peak Hour, Inbound(vph) 4
PM Peak Hour, Outbound (vph) 2
Total AM Peak 6
vpd-vehicles per day, vph -vehicles per hour
While not a part of this project, and also per the Town of Oro Valley's direction, trip
generation was also completed for the conceptual specialty retail center mentioned
previously. Trip generation was estimated for the construction of a 12,000 square foot
specialty retail center based on ITE Land Use Code 814, Specialty Retail Center. The
result is the expected weekday trip generation for the conceptual 12,000 square foot
specialty retail center as shown in Table 3.
Final Traffic Impact Analysis 11
Rooney Ranch, First Avenue/Lambert Lane
Table 3—Weekday Specialty Retail Center Generated Trips
Time.Period Weekday_
Average Daily,Inbound(vpd) 245
Average Daily,Outbound(vpd) 245
Total Daily 489
PM Peak Hour,Inbound(vph) 14
PM Peak Hour, Outbound(vph) 18
Total AM Peak 32
vpd- vehicles per day, vph-vehicles per hour
Trip Distribution & Assignment
Trip distribution for the project is based on current volumes and traffic patterns near the
site. Figures 4 and 5 show the weekday trip distribution for the project and conceptual
specialty retail store as a percentage of net new primary trips. Figures 6 and 7 show the
assignment of these trips to the existing project intersections and driveways within the
study area.
Access
As mentioned previously, the new project will be constructed on an undeveloped piece of
property. Access to the site will be from two intersections. Both intersections will be
located along First Avenue.
The first intersection is located at the signalized intersection of First Avenue/Lambert
Lane. The addition of this leg to the intersection will make it a complete four-way
intersection with full turning movement capability on the new westbound approach.
Due to concerns regarding vehicles leaving the proposed right in/right out intersection,
approximately 900 feet north of Lambert Lane, traveling north approximately 200 feet
pp y
and making a northbound U-turn at a future median break along First Avenue, the Town
of Oro Valley has requested the relocation of the proposed second driveway serving the
project site. The second intersection would be located approximately 1,100 feet north of
the intersection of First Avenue/Lambert Lane at the intersection of First
Avenue/Frontage Road, the proposed future median break. This driveway would have
full turning movement capabilities.
However, this driveway location may not be possible due to drainage, 404 permit, and
onsite project layout issues. If the second driveway cannot be relocated to the Town's
suggested location, it is recommended that the future median break be signed 'NO U-
turns'.
Final Traffic Impact Analysis 1 2
Rooney Ranch, First Avenue/Lambert Lane
cu
z
F
T
cy, —
411
......A 1 t xx AM Peak Hour
(7%)13%--v o d (xx) PM Peak Hour
in vc
F— ':.. 7---,
1 7 -1( 4- 8%(13%)
16%(11%)
Frontage Road
g ...._44,
---* 41 t r Project Site
,::,' o •
M •--+
ri €
CI
..., Lo
C en -4
F F— ch
4__ 13%(31%)
N � � 4--- 6%(16%)
41 1 ,f-- 57%(29%)
Lambert Lane
(4%)5% --a` i tit.
o
(13%) 17% --r+
OO
0
o
N o-
.--. O
d'
te
a1, �O
QA(j?-%) 1///
Ck I ,S? of
.< ecfr
�6 ,,k\
�6�a o
°1 0 ,_ „„ .
,,,- - N ,,,,„ cp
.,
i O
a� ..,
J ,..
e
O,� ,/
0 ,l
�1 ���j`'�i -, to
� o rf (��J
6%
o
77
O\ C
OS-c
4
Final Traffic Impact Analysis Dwelling Unit Weekday Peak Hour Trip Distribution
Rooney Ranch Figure 4
.1)
P =
= A
(I)
lizIM
pm, ,
,
_ ,...,
ii.
41 iy
P
ii• —4 t , xx PM Peak Hour
1O% —
c C7,
P — m
IN
Ln el!, Frontage Road
ION a,
-1- N
c.)
illt
E
OW
4— 35% *=
ir, '-)
N 1 7%
fill 41 i,, L f....... 33%
— 1%
lii ...-0,. .41 to. Lambert Lane
16% --A 41% --4, I I
111111 ---* ,,;)
:14- Project Site
4\ cei°
tk/
Oct'
GP
.., 7.
It-
ii/ 4.to of,
ic) cs-
,,„,..\\
\ N .Scpo
N • 7'4
/it °
,
i
s----5°
--, 77 iith,
0\-
.
OM
Final Traffic Impact Analysis Specialty Retail Weekday Peak Hour Trip Distribution
Rooney Ranch Figure 5
Qu
A,.
E _
,...
00
....,N
E41 vly xx AM Peak Hour
___,,*, 41 t Naranja Drive (xx)PM Peak Hour
(8)4
0
N ,---.N
"" '� 4.-- 7(8)
E41 + - 15(6)Frontage RoadProject Site
E --, 1 t r .
/01 N O
r..,
t _a
F.21, -1-tY'1 N
4-cy 12(18)
N .♦.-- 5(9)
q-- 51 (17)
Lambert Lane
(1) 1 ---* ltr
(13)5 ---4.
in N VD
r hb
�1
4-941
4,t,„QJ N
IP/if/ cC*'e'
ic
ojp.,, vgf\
(-5.9 ss
) NIAN 6
rir
,If 6) t'\
'\ f lik $
IN: se 1//z
it1
...., 77
.-.
tz_,
,,,
4.4-\
Final Traffic Impact Analysis Dwelling Unit Weekday Peak Hour Trip Assignment
p y
Rooney Ranch (vehicles per hour)
Figure 6
A
xx PM Peak Hour
41 I Naranja Drive
1,
Frontage Road
t 1°'
4-- 6
4- 2
f----- 1
t
Lambert Lane
2 -k 41 °'
Project Site
Itt/
CZ)cb'
106.'/e
cbd
&
4
/ft,
/
NI/
P\
3 NA,
27
Final Traffic Impact Analysis Specialty Retail Weekday Peak Hour Trip Assignment
Rooney Ranch (vehicles per hour)
Figure 7
The Town of Oro Valley is more than halfway through the design of a First Avenue
widening project, which includes the widening of the CDO Wash Bridge and First
Avenue to a five-lane roadway section with a center raised median. Improvements to the
First Avenue/Lambert Lane intersection includes the addition of an exclusive eastbound
through lane and an exclusive southbound left turn lane which will serve Rooney Ranch.
Construction of this project is expected to begin in 2004.
The conceptual specialty retail center will be accessed by two driveways. The first
driveway will be located south of Lambert Lane on First Avenue. This driveway will
have right in/right out turning movement capability. The second driveway will be located
east of First Avenue on Lambert Lane. This driveway will have full turning movement
capability.
Field review of the proposed project site shows that sight distances appear to be adequate
at the proposed new Rooney Ranch intersections.
Existing Traffic Operations
Analysis of current intersection operations was conducted for the AM and PM peak hours
using the nationally accepted methodology set forth in the Highway Capacity Manual,
Transportation Research Board, 2000. The computer software HCS (Highway Capacity
Software) was utilized to calculate the levels of service for individual movements,
approaches, and for the intersections as a whole.
Level of service (LOS) is a qualitative measure of the traffic operations at an intersection
or on a roadway segment. Level of service is ranked from LOS A, which signifies little
or no congestion and is the highest rank, to LOS F, which signifies congestion and jam
conditions. LOS D is typically considered adequate operation at signalized and un-
signalized intersections.
At signalized intersections, level of service is calculated for each movement and then is
summed in a weighted fashion to yield the LOS for the approach and for the intersection
as a whole. The criteria for level of service at signalized intersections are shown in Table
4.
Table 4 - Level of Service Criteria—Signalized Intersections
�
f
r .LeveI-o€`.Ser k ': ti� x::*, .-:',Average Total Dela'
A < 10.0 seconds
B > 10.0 and<20.0 seconds/vehicle
C >20.0 and<3 5.0 seconds/vehicle
D >35.0 and<55.0 seconds/vehicle
E >55.0 and<80.0 seconds/vehicle
F >80.0 seconds per vehicle
Final Traffic Impact Analysis 17
Rooney Ranch, First Avenue/Lambert Lane
In calculating the levels of service, assumed signal phasing and timing data at the First
Avenue/Oracle Road was used. The Town of Oro Valley provided a 117 second cycle
length for the signalized intersection of First Avenue/Lambert Lane. Other assumptions
included:
• Cycle length--90 seconds
• Right turn on red-20%
• Lane widths— 12 feet
• Approach grade—0%
At un-signalized intersections, level of service is calculated for those movements which
must either stop for or yield to oncoming traffic and is based on average control delay for
the particular movement. Control delay is the portion of total delay attributed to traffic
control measures such as stop signs and traffic signals. The criteria for level of service at
unsignalized intersections are shown below in Table 5.
Table 5 - Level of Service Criteria—Unsignalized Intersections
i; �
Cif-Service
A
< 10 seconds
B > 10 and< 15 seconds/vehicle
C > 15 and<25 seconds/vehicle
D >25 and<35 seconds/vehicle
E >35 and<50 seconds/vehicle
F > 50 seconds per vehicle
Existing levels of service were calculated for the adjacent major intersections in the study
area. The results of this analysis are shown in Table 6. Complete capacity calculations
are included in the Appendix.
As shown in Table 6, all of the un-signalized study intersections currently operate at an
adequate LOS D or better during the weekday peak hours.
While the intersection of First Avenue/Oracle Road operates at an adequate LOS D
during the AM peak hour, the intersection operates at an inadequate LOS F during the
PM peak hour. This delay is due to the intersection's limited capacity and the large
amount of traffic passing through the intersection especially in the northbound and
southbound directions on Oracle Road.
The intersection of First Avenue/Lambert Lane operates at an inadequate LOS F during
the AM peak hour. This delay is also due to the intersection's limited capacity and the
large amount of traffic passing through the intersection especially southbound direction
on First Avenue.
Final Traffic Impact Analysis 18
Rooney Ranch. First Avenue/Lambert Lane
Table 6--Existing Peak Hour Levels of Service
,AIVIPeak :PM Peak
Intersection LOS Delay LOS _::Delay
First Avenue/Oracle Road D 40.7 F 109.2
OD First Avenue/Lambert Lane F >120 C 26.2
First Avenue/Fry's Driveway r" � a;`yL3,gar
H�..<S �»fLn.:�l�/�r>u�y�fYQ;�'JC'"�� ����y P
Westbound Left B 11.8 A 9.3
Northbound Left C 22.9 D 28.2
Northbound Right D 29.1 C 15.2
Northbound.Approach D 25.9 C 23.0
First Avenue/Home Depot Driveway � �, �N'�t>Ny[a3 c'p�.✓ciw Z .?{x�'Y,,��:?<`��Y.V'7
Southbound Right B 11.3 D 26.1
Southbound Approach B 11.3 D 26.1
First Avenue/Frontage Road f M 4*AilFg figNt*fyAYh*h
Northbound Left B 10.2 A 8.4
Eastbound Left/Right C 21.3 C 21.1
Eastbound Approach C 21.3 C 21.1
First Avenue/Naranja Drive 111111111111
Northbound Left B 10.0 A 8.9
Eastbound Left B 14.8 D 26.4
Eastbound Right D 26.1 B 11.9
Eastbound Approach C 23.4 C 17.6
Delay-seconds per vehicle
Future Traffic Operations Without Project
In order to assess the impacts of the project on future traffic operations, traffic projections
were made for the year 2005, which is the year the project is expected to open.
Based on past Pima Association of Governments (PAG) traffic volumes along First
Avenue, along with using traffic volumes collected for this study, it can be estimated that
traffic volumes in the area will grow on the order of about five percent per year. Per the
Town of Oro Valley's direction, the First Avenue Lambert Lane to Tangerine Road Final
Traffic Engineering Report, September 2001, and the Traffic Impact Study for the Oro
Valley Town Center Development, April 2002, were reviewed to determine the impacts of
the extension of Pusch View Lane, from Oracle Road to Lambert Lane, on the
intersections of First Avenue/Lambert Lane and First Avenue/Oracle Road.
The Pusch View Lane extension is expected to be completed in 2005 and will provide an
alternative connection to Lambert Lane from Oracle Road. After review of the reports
and discussion with the Town of Oro Valley, a 60% reduction factor was taken into
account for the eastbound right turn lane and northbound left turn lane at the intersection
of First Avenue/Lambert Lane. The reduction factor was also applied to the eastbound
right turn lane and northbound left turn lane at the intersection of First Avenue/Oracle
Road.
Final Traffic Impact Analysis 19
Rooney Ranch, First Avenue/Lambert Lane
Using the compounded yearly traffic growth rate and the reduction factor due to the
extension of Pusch View Lane to Lambert Lane, 2005 weekday peak hour traffic volumes
without the project were estimated as shown in Figure 8.
As with the current volumes, levels of service were calculated for each of the
intersections in the study area for 2005 without the project. With the completion of the
First Avenue Improvement Project, Oracle Road Improvement District Project expected
prior to completion of Rooney Ranch and the Pusch View Lane extension, level of
service calculations were completed using the new street geometrics. Improvements
include a five-lane roadway section for First Avenue, widening for the First Avenue
approach to Oracle Road, realignment and signalization of the offset intersection of First
Avenue/Home Depot-Fry's Driveway, signalization of the 'T' intersection of First
Avenue/Naranja Drive, and widening of Oracle Road. In addition, the cycle length and
phasing of the intersection of First Avenue/Lambert Lane was changed to accommodate
the new geometrics of the intersection.
Levels of service for 2005 without the project are shown in Table 7. Complete capacity
calculations are included in the Appendix.
Table 7--2005 Peak Hour Levels of Service Without Project
AM°Teak TM:Teak
intersection ,':LOS ,Delay: ,VDS = Delay
First Avenue/Oracle Road C 26.4 C 33.6
First Avenue/Frvs Home Deyot B 11.9 B 12.9
First Avenue/Lambert Lane B 16.0 B 15.0
First Avenue/Naranja Drive B 15.4 B 13.1
First Avenue/Frontage Road
Northbound Left B 10.6 A 8.6
Eastbound Left C 18.2 B 12.5
Eastbound Right B 12.6 B 10.1
Eastbound Approach B 14.5 B 11.3
Delay-seconds per vehicle
As shown in Table 7, all of the study intersections continue to operate adequately at LOS
C or better in 2005 during the AM and PM weekday peak hours without the project and
with the Town of Oro Valley Improvements.
Warrant Analysis
In order to determine if a traffic signal is currently warranted for the intersections of First
Avenue/Lambert Lane and First Avenue/Naranja Drive based on current volumes and
using future projected traffic, signal warrant studies were completed at the intersections
for the existing conditions and the year 2005 without the project. Improved geometries,
as mentioned previously, were also used in the analyses.
Final Traffic Impact Analysis 20
Rooney Ranch, First Avenue/Lambert Lane
►7'
, N
I _
t-n-,.:„, .
, .....,
......,0°
00 ts-
111 .11 AM Peak Hour
(99)89---* l t Naranja Drive (xx) PM Peak Hour
I (150)257-1 o v
^M
ON 00
N
`..O
Project Site
I
Frontage Road 4.11
(1) 1 -i
lt
(1)2 ----1' Or`
MID 01
e rq
�
o c
N O
qtr
• 3f`
- Lambert Lane
(57)36 t
(126) 165 —I, c-
^M
00
.ter ,-r
-✓pN
ti.s
I
1 (- •‘ -'6.
ct",
. P // r'' .4e e.
0/5) -)sry
<.),? \iNif °''\ 01). 0 47
-) e .-'r''
J
e\IN r/44 5r6-) , .,) -z)_
1/Z
rs r1�I 111 � ?) '5' ././j�rss
0 77 59
G, /4.-
d c}�~rb
,, e\ r7;1 m
446
Final Traffic Impact Analysis 2005 Weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
Rooney Ranch Without Project
(vehicles per hour)
0 Figure 8
The 60% reduction factor due to the Pusch View Lane extension, as explained earlier in
this report, was also used at the intersection of First Avenue/Lambert Lane.
The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), Federal Highway
Administration, 2000, lists 8 warrants that are used to determine if a traffic signal should
be considered for installation at an intersection. A traffic signal is warranted if one or
more of the warrants are satisfied. Warrants #1 (Eight Hour Volume), #2 (Four Hour
Vehicular Volume), and #3 (Peak Hour) were used to evaluate the need to signalize the
intersection. Based on existing conditions, availability of information, and applicability,
the remaining warrants (##4, #5, #6, #7, and #8) do not apply to the given conditions. It
was assumed for each of the warrants that the 85th percentile speed was greater than 40
mph.
Warrant #1 (Eight Hour Volume) is satisfied when for at least eight (8) hours of an
average day, specific traffic volume levels are met for both the major and minor streets
(Condition A — Minimum Vehicular Volume). The MUTCD states these volumes to be
420 vehicles per hour (vph) combined for both of the First Avenue approaches, at each
intersection, and 140 vph on the eastbound approaches on Lambert Lane and Naranja
Drive.
Warrant #1 also applies to operating conditions where the major street traffic levels are
sufficiently high that traffic entering or crossing from a minor street suffers excessive
delay (Condition B — Interruption of Continuous Traffic). Once again, the warrant is
satisfied when for each of any of the same eight (8) hours of an average day, specific
traffic volume levels are met for both the major and minor streets. The MUTCD states
these volumes to be 630 vph combined for both the First Avenue approaches, at each
intersection, and 70 vph on the eastbound minor street approaches.
Warrant #2 (Four Hour Volume) is met when, for any four hours of the average day on
both the major and minor streets, the hourly approach volumes are above the plotted
curve contained in the MUTCD (see Appendix).
Warrant #3 (Peak Hour Volume) is met when, for any hour of the day, approach volumes
on both the major and minor streets are above the plotted curve contained in the MUTCD
(see Appendix).
Tables 8 and 9 show the results of the existing and 2005 analyses without the project.
The Appendix contains a complete set of each of the warrant analyses.
As shown in Table 8, the intersection of First Avenue/Lambert Lane satisfies all of the
applicable warrants for both current conditions and future conditions without the project
in 2003 and 2005.
Final Traffic Impact Analysis 22
Rooney Ranch,First Avenue/Lambert Lane
Table 8—First Avenue/Lambert Lane Warrant Analysis Without Project
Warrant Nu zither
1
_ '2 3 5 -6 7
Year Condition A Conditio
2003 Yes Yes Yes Yes * * * *
Hours Met 15 15 15 14 * * * * *
,;♦ Y�, 3 �? k":"�i$ kw),J`.4ft xek:y .a.,# -G`.<'`',c^Tr,1 r3s£>'�rS tcyyy77�'c<k"r.Y)15-. ,y'.,<y yys{c
-::.Ztt•.:5.,,,v5^y ,.>} KY3L,i ���:�ki.+t.:,fi,`.>E;..�.L":•s,:+k�.S 2c f.,...,•`•S'��.k,�'.4-.�L S�+r°C� �p }S: � ebpf. ;s .•e f
2005 Yes Yes Yes Yes * * * * *
Hours Met 11 15 14 12 * * * * *
*Warrant Does Not Apply
Table 9—First Avenue/Naranja Drive Warrant Analysis Without Project
Warrant Number
1
•'y 2 _3 ,4 6 7 8
Condition•.. Year A :Condition:B
2003 Yes Yes Yes Yes * * * * *
Hours Met 14 14 15 11
2005 Yes Yes Yes Yes * * * * *
Hours Met 15 15 15 14 * * * * *
*Warrant Does Not Apply
As shown in Table 9, the intersection of First Avenue/Naranja Drive satisfies all of the
applicable warrants for both current conditions and future conditions without the project
in 2003 and 2005.
The results shown in tables 8 and 9 agree with the results in the First Avenue Lambert
Lane to Tangerine Road Final Traffic Engineering Report, September 2001, which found
traffic signals were also warranted at each of the intersections analyzed.
While traffic volumes at both of the intersections currently, and in the future without the
project, satisfy traffic signal warrants, it is important to mention that traffic signals should
not be installed because one or more of the warrants are satisfied. The MUTCD warrants
reflect only the lowest minimum levels on which traffic engineers agree. It also states
that, "The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the
installation of a traffic control signal."
Moreover, the southbound approach at the 'T' intersection of First Avenue/Naranja Drive
travels along an approximate 4% down slope after a crest in the hill immediately north of
the intersection. This condition limits sight distance for vehicles traveling southbound on
First Avenue approaching Naranja Drive. As a result, an above average possibility of
rear-end accidents with the installation of the traffic signal, as part of Oro Valley
improvements, would be expected.
Final Traffic Impact Analysis 23
Rooney Ranch,First Avenue/Lambert Lane
Future Traffic Operations With Project
In order to assess the impacts of the project on future traffic operations, levels of service
were calculated for each project intersection for 2005 with the project. Peak hour traffic
volumes for 2005 without the project were combined with the estimated trips generated
by the project to yield peak hour traffic volumes with the project as shown in Figure 9.
As described previously, level of service calculations were completed using the improved
street geometrics along Oracle Road, First Avenue, Lambert Lane, Naranja Drive, and
Pusch View Lane. In addition, the cycle length and phasing of the intersection of First
Avenue/Lambert Lane was-changed to accommodate the new east leg of the intersection.
Weekday intersection levels of service for 2005 with the project were then calculated as
shown in Table 10. Complete capacity calculations are included in the Appendix.
As shown in Table 10, the additional traffic generated by the project will not significantly
lower the weekday level of service at the study intersections. All of the study
intersections will operate at an adequate level of service C or better during the weekday
peak hours, including the new intersection on First Avenue, north of Lambert Lane. This
intersection will operate adequately as a right turn in/right turn out only intersection or
aligned with the existing Frontage Road intersection. The driveways to the conceptual
specialty retail center will operate at an adequate LOS B or better during the 2005 peak
hours with the project.
Turn Lane Analysis
A key element of this study is to determine if right and left turn lanes, on the major
streets, are required at the project site intersections. As far as the author of this report
knows, neither the Arizona Department of Transportation nor the Town of Oro Valley
has published warrants for the inclusion of right turn lanes at un-signalized intersections.
However, the ITE provides guidelines for the installation of right and left-turn lanes on
roadways. The figures from the ITE Traffic Engineering Handbook, 5th Edition are
provided in the Technical Appendix. The figures compare the through volumes on the
major road against the turn lane volumes from the major road to determine if the specific
turn lane is warranted.
In the absence of local standards, these charts, which are included in the Appendix, were
used to determine the need for right and left turn lanes. Turn lanes are needed when the
percentage of turning traffic is high in relation to the total approach volume. A turn lane
removes the slowing turning traffic from the through traffic stream, improving capacity
and reducing rear-end accidents. Based on the 2005 PM peak hour traffic volumes with
the project, Table 11 was developed.
Final Traffic Impact Analysis 24
Rooney Ranch, First Avenue/Lambert Lane
E .
,
c , ,,- A0
› T
..„
E , -
�4 N
, ...,
..,....
gyp ..,
00 00
E41 yl xx AM Peak Hour
99 89 --* Naranja Drive (xx)PM Peak Hour
(159)261 —�, o j
E , d ^t*,
kr) N O
00
O
7 7 7 4. 7(8)
4 j, I, f-- 15(6)
.y Project Site
Frontage Road (1) 1 --4"
(1)2 l
N
O O, ,p U
l`
00 .—
c >0,,
o�— '`''' 4— 12 24
)
1
4--- 5(11) *— 68(44),;' j I,
L ,f — 51 (23) 0(1)
(58)37 ___A. 41 (80)23 --0. 4 1 r
Lambert Lane
I 5
(15)5 —4. O 0 --v
S (126) 165 --Ir tr) 1 ,...., _ 00
?4 M',I; Project Site '�
—. M �..i
\ _09) ‘4 \ ''te
. ti(i) SY
cC
ayGl � `yI
v•// %)c)L- et,
I.- (-- e
„..) , , , 4,t,,,
i it
r,1-J9%-
r✓ 1� 7 ��'
.gyp . �'� �jJ, (1
7q-) J b
e\
-�� e,_.,-.., -,,,,0 �/
or,f6J60,�s� PN. 39 NrN sJ
IP - -v,?)�3jes 1j.�(`s9J
IMF
k,7iifii,
(..., co
e-s, cti ^')
•I ,,,')
1 ,, Final Traffic Impact Analysis 2005 Weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
Rooney Ranch With Project
(vehicles per hour)
Figure 9
Table 10--2005 Peak Hour Levels of Service With Project
2005 Without Project .2005 With Project
t'Peak PM Peak AM Peak :PM Peak
Intersection LOS "Delay I`Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay
First Avenue/Oracle Road C 26.4 C 33.6 C 26.4 C 34.1
First Avenue/Frys Home Depot B 11.9 B 12.9 B 12.1 B 13.0
First Avenue/Lambert Lane B 16.0 B 15.0 B 16.2 B 15.3
First Avenue/Naranja Drive B 15.4 B 13.1 B 15.5 B 13.2
First Avenue/Frontage Road
Northbound Left B 10.6 A 8.6 B 10.7 A 8.7
Southbound Left n/a A 8.3 B 10.7
Eastbound Left C 18.2 B 12.5 C 21.9 B 13.9
Eastbound Right B 12.6 B 10.1 B 12.7 B 10.2
Eastbound Approach B 14.5 B 11.3 C 15.7 B 12.0
Westbound Left B 13.2 C 20.9
Westbound Right n/a A 9.7 B 12.6
Westbound Approach B 12.1 C 16.1
First Avenue/Commercial Dwy#1 r,ir hrr `
Westbound Right A 9.4 B 12.0
Westbound Approach n'a A 9.4 B 12.0
Lambert Lane/Commercial Dwy#2 *
Westbound Right A 7.2 A 7.4
Northbound Left A 9.0 A 9.3
n;a
Northbound Right A 8.4 A 8.5
Northbound A..roach A 9.0 A 9.3
LOS if Drivew1 Cannot Be A ._ned
First Avenue/Lambert Lane B 16.0 B 15.0 B 16.0 B 15.3
First Avenue/Driveway#1
Westbound Right A 9.4 B 11.5
n'a
Westbound Approach A 9.4 B 11.5
First Avenue/Frontage Road
Northbound Left B 10.6 A 8.6 B 10.7 A 8.7
Eastbound Left C 18.2 B 12.5 C 18.5 B 12.7
Eastbound Right B 12.6 B 10.1 B 12.7 B 10.2
Eastbound Approach B 14.51 B 11.3 B 14.6 B 11.4
Delay-seconds per vehicle
Table 11 - Recommended Turn Treatments With. Project
Intersection Direction Turn Treatment:Warranted
First Avenue/Lambert Lane NB Right Turn Lane
First Avenue/Lambert Lane SB Left Turn Lane
First Avenue/Frontage Road NB Right Turn Lane
First Avenue/Commercial Driveway#1 NB Right Turn Lane
Lambert Lane/Commercial Driveway#2 EB none
Lambert/Commercial Driveway#2 WB none
Final Traffic Impact Analysis 26
Rooney Ranch, First Avenue/Lambert Lane
Another key element of this study is to determine storage lengths for the left and right
turn lanes associated with the project. Queue storage requirements were calculated using
the following methods as recommended in A Policy of Geometric Design of Highways
and Streets (AASHTO, 2001).
For signalized intersections, assuming random arrivals:
Vehicles/cycle=2 x (vehicles/hour)/cycles/hour
Storage length=vehicles/cycle x 25 feet
A 90-second cycle length was used in the computations.
For un-signalized intersections, storage for vehicles likely to arrive in an average two-
minute period within the peak hour should be provided.
Vehicles per 2 min. period = (vehicles/hour)�(30 periods/hour)
Storage length=vehicles per 2 min. period x 25 feet
Based on the 2005 PM peak hour traffic volumes with the project the storage lengths
were found for the left and right turn lanes serving Rooney Ranch at the intersections of
First Avenue/Lambert Lane and the project driveway located along First Avenue, north
of Lambert Lane. Each computed value was rounded up to the nearest 25 feet. Table 12
shows the required storage lengths for these left and right turn lanes into the project site.
Complete storage length calculations can be found in the Appendix.
Table 12 --Calculated Turn Lane Storage Lengths
IntersectionLeft Turn Stor.�a ge Ri:ht Turn Stora
B SB WB 'NB SB EB WB
First Avenue/Lambert Lane
Turning Volume(vph) 23 47
Scalculated= 29 59
srounded= 50 75
First Avenue/Frontage Road .RKwi, K /ikC {\.� Ax
F .;`
Turning Volume(vph) 17
S calculated= 14
S rounded— 2
First Avenue/Comm. Dwy#2 4,
,Co z°.J .ir F !aS.. <> a `mkt 4r 'k 2 ?S> ''^♦ R..L.j<iaty o <Y+ •'+'R•
Turning Volume(vph) 8
Scalculated_ 7
s rounded
S- storage in feet, vph -vehicles per hour
Final Traffic Impact Analysis 27
Rooney Ranch, First Avenue/Lambert Lane
While the right and left turn storage calculations show various storage lengths under 100
feet, it is recommended that 100 feet of storage, if possible, be provided for each of the
specified right turn lanes and 150 feet for each of the specified left turn lanes to allow for
a level of consistency around the project site.
Traffic Mitigation
While all of the intersections will operate at an adequate level of service during the
weekday peak hours in 2005 without and with the projects, and with the Town of Oro
Valley improvements to First Avenue yet to be completed, it is still possible toro ose
P p
mitigation measures, or improvements for the First Avenue corridor adjacent to the
40-:
f__ =. project site to further improve safety and traffic flow.
E- First Avenue/Naranja Drive. As mentioned earlier, this 'T' intersection already meets
several traffic signal warrants. In addition, the southbound approach at the intersection of
First Avenue/Naranja Drive travels along an approximate 4% down slope after a crest in
the hill immediately north of the intersection. This condition limits sight distance for
vehicles traveling southbound on First Avenue approaching Naranja Drive. As a result,
an above average possibility of rear-end accidents with the installation of the traffic
signal, as part of Oro Valley improvements, would be expected. With the removal of the
proposed traffic signal, this situation would be limited. Capacity analysis for a STOP
controlled intersection at First Avenue/Naranja Drive shows this intersection will operate
at an adequate LOS C or better during the 2005 weekday peak hours with the addition of
the project. Northbound and southbound traffic would be free flow, while the eastbound
approach would be STOP controlled.
Internal Circulation
As part of this study, the operation of the internal circulation and pedestrian area of the
project was reviewed. Design internal site circulation focus on several items including
making pedestrian connections and walkways available between various site uses, sight
distances, cut-through traffic possibilities, and traffic calming. These items were both
examined individually and as a whole to determine if they function together and reduce
conflict points.
The internal street network will consist of one type of roadway classification: residential
street. The residential roads will function as the connection roadway between the
majority of the development and the site access points. Local residential streets in
Arizona typically carry between four and eight hundred vehicles per day on a typical
weekday.
The site plan shows adequate storage capacity for vehicles exiting the site the site onto
First Avenue. Parking areas have been removed from the vicinity of driveways that may
experience a large volume of traffic. Adequate sight distances along internal roadway
curves may be limited by on street parking.
Final Traffic Impact Analysis 28
Rooney Ranch, First Avenue/Lambert Lane
Pedestrian walkways have been provided throughout the site and between the new homes
to ensure safer pedestrian access to recreational areas and First Avenue.
Cut-through traffic should be non-existence in the neighborhood due to the lack of direct
connections to adjacent destinations. Internal roadways within the development strictly
serve the project site. Roadways that are relatively straight and over 500 feet in length
(i.e. section of road immediately serving First Avenue) may experience speeding issues.
Contracted roadway sections, median islands, chokers, chicanes or traffic circles will
assist in limiting high speeds in the neighborhood.
Synchro Analysis
As part of this report, a Synchro/SimTraffic analysis was performed to determine the
level of operation of the First Avenue corridor between Naranja Drive and Oracle Road
with the Town of Oro Valley proposed improvements to First Avenue. The PM peak
hour in 2005 without and with the project was analyzed using Synchro and SimTraffic.
Synchro and SimTraffic are capable of analyzing signalized and un-signalized
intersections within a network. The use of Synchro and SimTraffic can take into account
how the operations and queues at one intersection affect the operations at another nearby
intersection. All intersections were analyzed using both Synchro and SimTraffic Version
5. Synchro was used to generate the timing plan for the signalized intersections, while
SimTraffic was used for the operational analysis of all three intersections within the study
area.
Synchro, which is a macroscopic traffic model, is used to optimize signal timing and
coordination between intersections. A macroscopic traffic model analyzes intersections
based on lane and movement groups, and will assume every vehicle in a lane group
moves together. SimTraffic, which is a microscopic traffic model, is used for the
operational analysis of the corridor. A microscopic traffic model analyzes intersections
based on individual vehicles in a network, and each vehicle has individual parameters and
car following logic. SimTraffic uses random numbers to determine when new vehicles
enter a network and to choose vehicle paths through a network. This approach can cause
unique network performance results, therefore, three different simulation runs are
performed and the results are averaged.
Table 13 presents the Synchro/SimTraffic results for the 2005 PM peak hour on First
Avenue between Naranja Drive and Oracle without and with the addition of the project.
A 90 second cycle length was assumed to obtain coordination of the system with the
additional traffic signals and the project. Complete SimTraffic run information can be
found in the Appendix.
Final Traffic Impact Analysis 29
Rooney Ranch,First Avenue/Lambert Lane
Table 13—PM Peak Hour SimTraff c LOS Coordination Analysis
v
First Avenue—Oracle Road to Naranja Drive
• Intersection
First Firstirst First
First Ave/Fryls-
Ave/Oracle Ave/Lambert Ave/Frontage AvefNarnaja
Homer:Depot
'Year Rd Ln Rd Dr
2005 Without Project
Level of Service B B B A B
2005 With :1105.di,., : Pa.. -- ..,.rwrKtrAiNVAISIMINit
r.,...
Level of Service -B B B A B
As shown in Table 11, all of the intersections will operate adequately as a coordinated
system during the 2005 PM Peak hour with a 90 second cycle length without and with the
project.
Conclusion
When fully completed, the proposed project will generate an additional 1006 vehicles per
day (vpd) on weekdays to the adjacent street system, which includes the conceptual
specialty retail center. These vehicles will generate 2,012 additional trips in the area.
The addition of site-generated trips will not affect the level of service of the intersections
in the study area. All of the project intersections will operate at an adequate LOS C or
better during the 2005 weekday peak hours with the project.
The intersections of First Avenue/Lambert Lane and First Avenue/Naranja Drive both
meet traffic signal warrants for current conditions and future conditions without the
project in 2003 and 2005.
Right turn lanes into the project site, with a minimum of 100 feet of storage, should be
constructed at the intersections of First Avenue/Lambert Lane, the project driveway
located along First Avenue, north of Lambert Lane, and First Avenue/Commercial
Driveway #1. The southbound left turn lane on First Avenue at Lambert Lane should
provide a minimum of 150 feet of storage length.
The addition of the proposed new traffic signal at the 'T' intersection of First
Avenue/Naranja Drive may increase the possibility of rear-end accidents due to the
downhill southbound approach. With the removal of the proposed traffic signal, this
situation would be limited. Capacity analysis for a STOP controlled `T' intersection at
First Avenue/Naranja Drive shows this intersection will operate at an adequate LOS C or
better during the 2005 weekday peak hours with the addition of the project. Northbound
and southbound traffic would be free flow, while the eastbound approach would be STOP
controlled.
C:\rooney ranch\traffic\\finalmial 7oct03.doc
Final Traffic Impact Analysis 30
Rooney Ranch, First Avenue/Lambert Lane
Attachment 6: General Plan Analysis of the Proposed Project.
Following are the current General Plan Goals and Policies that are either(1) positively addressed by the Project,
or(2) that the Project does not conform to, along with a planning rationale and discussion.
General Plan Policies the Proposed Project Conflicts With:
Goal 1.1: Preserve Oro Valley's natural Sonoran Desert environment and scenic resources which are an important
part of the community's quality of life.
Policy 1.1B: Promote clustering (average density) developments to protect environmentally sensitive areas.
Clustering is a development design technique that permits a reduction in lot area and bulk requirements,
provided there is no increase in the number of lots, and the remaining land area is devoted to open space.
In large-lot or multi-family developments, clustering may also be accomplished by placing building pads
close to each other as mechanisms are in place to protect remaining open space.
Policy 1.1C: Clusters should be encouraged for the preservation of significant, passive use, natural open space within
residential neighborhoods. The integration of natural open space within clustered developments should
promote openness within the housing development.
Policy 1.1D: The Hillside Development Overlay Zone (HDZ) grading and development standards shall be considered
at the time of rezoning and shall supersede when a conflict exists between the land use map and the HDZ
standards.
'olicy 1.1H: Slopes 15% and greater shall be evaluated for development compatibility, safety, and preservation as
natural open space.
Policy 1.11: Oro Valley shall encourage the use of building envelopes in master planned communities, which
encourages natural buffers between housing units. Building envelopes designate the specific area that
can be disturbed in any way during or following construction. The area outside the building envelope
must be maintained in a natural state.
Policy 1.2C: Utilize site analysis in determining appropriateness of development proposals for specific sites.
Policy 6.2D: Hillside development will be carefully controlled through the strengthening of the grading standards and
criteria.
Policy 8.1.A: Aggressively ensure that damage caused by blading is repaired and returned to its natural state.
Policy 9.1E: All development proposals should show design strategies used to minimize changes to existing
topography and the disturbance of existing vegetation.
Policy 9.1.D. All development proposals should attempt to arrange buildings, massing of buildings, and/or
arrangements of lots to preserve views from adjacent properties and streets while providing privacy for
residents.
Planning Rationale describing how the Project conflicts with these Policies: Neither the proposed Area Z
standards or the accompanying TDP address these policies. Along with rolling desert terrain, the site features a
very prominent natural ridgeline bisecting the site in a north-south orientation. This ridgeline is a very
important natural and scenic feature of the site and area which would be retained under Area A development
with the exception of a roadway connecting the subareas. The November 20, 2003 revised Area Z TDP shows
the ridgeline broken up by the development of six lots as well as a connecting roadway. Under the revised Area
Z development standards and TDP, approximately 43.5 acres would be mass graded including over 3 acres of
and with slopes greater than 25%.
Policy 8.1B: Major natural washes and floodplains are to be kept free from development to minimize further flood
hazards and maintain natural/riparian areas, and conserve natural groundwater recharge of the aquifer.
Policy 8.1C: Wash encroachment may be permitted where floodplains are broad and shallow in order to permit a
reasonable utilization of property, unless such encroachment impedes natural groundwater recharge of
the aquifer.
Policy 8.1D: Avoid development in flood-prone areas and limit grading practices that contribute to flooding and
erosion.
Policy 8.1E: For drainage basins designated as "balanced basins" and any future basins designated as such, Pima
County Floodplain Management policies and regulations shall be adhered to.
Policy 8.1F: Allow only floodplain-compatible uses in flood-prone areas.
Goal 6.2: To protect the environmentally sensitive open space areas within the Planning Area.
Policy 6.2B: Open space preservation shall be used as a criterion in deciding the approval or denial of land use
rezoning proposals.
Policy 8.1S: Groundwater recharge potential should be preserved.
Policy 9.1B: Explore solutions that employ natural materials and prohibit designs that channelize water courses except
where extreme threats to public safety would exist.
Planning Rationale: The current Area A provisions of the Rooney Ranch PAD positively addresses this General
Plan .olic The proposed amendment conflicts with this policy in that the amendment would permit only low-
density,
density, single-family detached homes on lots that are created by severely grading slopes of both 15% and 25%
or greater. Lots would be created within the 100 year floodplain as well as jurisdictional wash lands. The
Applicant has chosen to avoid designing clusters of homes, either patio homes, zero-lot homes or other forms of
attached housing that can be "nestled" in-between the site's natural slopes. Rather, the Applicant has chosen to
mass grade and fill low-lying areas within the floodplain with soil from the site's natural slopes. Approximately
34 lots are proposed for development on 7.3 acres of land lying within the CDO Wash floodplain.
Potable water is provided to the Town by the Oro Valley Water Utility (OVWU). As stated by OVWU staff
Mark Moore in an October 24, 2003 email correspondence to staff, "It is the position of the OVWU that any
recharge basin preferably be left intact when a parcel is developed." The CDO Wash floodplain limit on-site
(located at the southwest corner of the site) serves as a natural water recharge area as well as a natural
stormwater-event "storage" facility which provides flood protection for downstream development. Alterations
to this natural land form as proposed by the TDP could, in the long-term, diminish natural groundwater recharge
abilities for the Town, perhaps adversely affecting the Town's assured water supply. Natural recharge of the
groundwater/aquifer is one of the three variables which enable the Town to meet its assured water supply; the
other two variables are (1) the use of reclaimed water for non-potable water use and (2) the use of CAP water.
ks CAP water and reclaimed water are limited quantities, the need for naturally-recurring groundwater recharge
will remain an important contribution to the Town's "assured water supply" for all of the Town's current and
future development and services. The Town's remaining natural groundwater recharge land areas should be
preserved to the greatest extent possible.
The CDO Wash floodplain area on the site also serves as stormwater event "storage" areas. Filling in this area
s proposed by the TDP may create flooding hazards to existing downstream development, as the land now used
as storm event storage would not serve that function and the "hard bank" retaining wall would increase the
velocity of water passing through this area and could cause downstream flood protection devises to fail or could
cause water to overflow those facilities, causing damage to downstream development (see Attachment 10 letter).
Policy 1.1K: Consider development impacts on natural rolling terrain and emphasize low-density developments in
these areas.
Goal 9.1: To ensure that the built environment is aesthetically pleasing and compatible with the natural
surroundings.
Planning Rationale: The proposed Project would not address this policy. The TDP would result in the removal
of substantial portions of the central hillsides to be used as fill for the CDO Wash floodplain on the southeastern
portion of the site. Using the existing TDP site lay-out and configuration, avoidance of grading on slopes
greater than 25% could result in the reduction of 25 lots within the subdivision, and an additional reduction of
34 lots would avoid filling the 100 year flood limit area of the CDO Wash. Clustering attached or single-family
homes in "nodes" tucked within the bottom portions of the natural hillsides would protect these hillsides and
would positively address this General Plan policy. Using the current TDP site plan, about 93 lots could be
provided while avoiding 25% slopes and the 100 year flood limits of the Wash.
Policy 1.1G: Large master planned communities should use fencing compatible with wildlife movement in sensitive
areas.
Planning Rationale: The Area Z development standards do not provide for such fencing along the eastern and
southern portion of the property which abuts the CDO Wash.
Goal 1.2: Promote a compatible mix of land uses throughout the Oro Valley Planning Area.
Planning Rationale: Development of single-family, detached homes does not promote a mix of land uses or
residential types within the Town. The current PAD does provide for a mix of uses on this property as well as a
mix of housing types. The current PAD, Area A standards conforms with and positively addresses this General
Plan policy,where the proposed amendment does not.
Policy 1.2A: Encourage the location of residential neighborhoods close to activity centers to minimize travel times.
Goal 4.2: To ensure a jobs/housing balance within the greater Oro Valley region.
Policy 4.2A: Encourage the provision of a variety of housing choices matched to employees within a reasonable
proximity of employment sites.
Planning Rationale: The proposed amendment would provide housing next to one of the Town's major
-ommercial centers, that of the Rooney Ranch Areas B and D. However, the PAD intended this site to be a
new, residential neighborhood which would provide housing even more closer to shopping and employment
activities; that is, within the Area A itself The current Area A addresses this General Plan policy more
effectively than the proposed amendment would.
Iolicy 1.2B: Piecemeal development is discouraged and master planning that looks comprehensively at an area is
encouraged.
Planning Rationale: The proposed amendment does not positively address this General Plan policy because it
fails to address how development of this 76.5 acre parcel would relate to the remaining 3 acres of Area A, nor to
the adjacent Rooney Ranch PAD Areas E and F, nor to the abutting Kai-Capri property to the north. The new
Area Z should be designed to link to these adjacent developments with cohesive and seamless circulation,
recreation trails and urban design principles and standards. The current amendment proposes a cross-access
minor street at a location that would not provide sufficient connectivity between the Project community and the
existing and future neighborhoods to the north. Town trail number 328 is not developed within the Site nor is
there connectivity to the CDO Wash or the neighborhoods to the north.
Policy 1.2D: Institute complementary zoning near open space, parks, washes, trails, trailheads, schools, and recreation
areas to provide adequate buffer.
Policy 1.2F: Locate higher density land uses and transportation-dependent uses near major transportation corridors.
Planning Rationale: The current Area A land uses and densities positively address these General Plan policies
because development under the Area A regulations would provide higher density, yet more site-specific
environmentally-sensitive development within walking distance of major recreational facilities, shopping and
transit. The proposed amendment, and it's accompanying TDP, conflicts with these policies in that they would
-rovide lower-density housing near transit and major recreational facilities.
Policy 1.3D: An evaluation of the adequacy of school facilities shall be developed as a finding for all residential land
use requests before the Planning and Zoning Commission at the time of rezoning.
Planning Rationale: The proposed amendment does not provide a letter from the school district related to the
adequacy of school facilities to serve this TDP.
Policy 1.3I: Ensure safe bike/pedestrian access to school sites from open space,parks, and neighborhoods.
Planning Rationale: Neither the proposed amendment, nor the accompanying TDP, provides development
standards or designs that meet this policy.
Circulation/Transportation Plan Policies and Recommendations
Goal 2.1: To ensure the safe, convenient and efficient vehicular and non-motorized traffic circulation to serve both
within and through the community.
Policy 2.4C: Major transportation system wash crossings (collector streets and above) should be designed to be
hydraulically efficient and environmentally sensitive with minimum disruptions to riparian habitat.
2olicy 2.1B: A program to identify and correct existing and potential traffic hazards should be implemented.
Planning Rationale: The proposed amendment and TDP does not conform to General Plan policies. The TDP
proposes principal vehicular access to the subdivision from First Avenue at Lambert Lane,with a secondary access
from First Avenue about 1,200 feet north of the Lambert Lane/First Avenue traffic light. The TDP provides a
neandering network of residential streets, featuring numerous cul-de-sac roads, which loop through the site to the
two access points. This circulation system does not provide an adequate, smooth and"seamless"connection to the
neighborhoods to the north, east of First Avenue (through the Kai-Capri property to the north). The TDP
circulation system also facilitates the plotting of lots within environmentally-sensitive lands (the floodplain and
natural hillsides).
The Town Engineer is studying the effectiveness and feasibility of improving Lambert Lane as a major 4-lane east-
west thoroughfare through the Town. In the future, Lambert Lane could link traffic from Oracle Road, via either
an extension of Pusch View Lane or from First Avenue, to Interstate I-10, either directly via an extension of
Lambert Lane to I-10 or via Lambert Lane and then turning south onto La Cholla Boulevard which would have a
direct connection to I-10.
A re-design of the Project TDP could meet General Plan policies if it provided a collector street through the
subdivision (east of the major ridgeline) with individual lots fronting on residential streets that connect to the main
collector street, with no lots having driveways fronting on the collector street.
A preliminary traffic impact has been submitted to support the PAD Amendment. The Department of Public
Works has reviewed and commented back to the traffic engineer on October 1, 2003.
As noted earlier in the case report, the Town Engineer has reviewed the TDP from two different scenarios. The
first one is similar to the proposed design which does not include any cross connection with the Kai-Capri
-property to the north. For reference we will call this scenario the"island" scenario. The second scenario, a
`cross-access" scenario would provide a collector street through the parcel that will eventually continue through
the Kai-Capri property and connect to Palisades Road. Driveways would not be permitted to connect directly to
the collector road. All connections would be provided by subdivision streets.
The Town Engineer's preference is the "cross-access" scenario. The reason for preferring the collector street
scenario is that it provides a better overall area transportation network than the island scenario. The benefits of
the second scenario are:
1. Lambert Lane is planned through the Pima Association of Governments as a major east/west arterial
road with an interchange connection to I-10.
2. Lambert Lane provides a link to La Cholla Boulevard which will have an interchange connection to I-10.
3. The collector road will reduce the amount of traffic on First Avenue.
4. A traffic signal at First Avenue and Naranj a Drive may not be warranted.
5. This collector road will reduce the traffic impact to Palisades Road by providing an alternative route.
It is important to note that if the Town Council prefers the island scenario a condition should be placed on the
action that no street connection shall be provided to the Kai-Capri property. The reason for this is that the
potential for"cut-through" traffic on residential streets would be high.
Policy 2.4D: View protection should be an essential aspect of Oro Valley's transportation design process. Where
possible, permanent protection of scenic vistas is to be encouraged, especially from the Oracle Road scenic corridor. Road
,onstruction on slopes should minimize the visual impact of the roadway.
Policy 2.1B: A program to identify and correct existing and potential traffic hazards should be implemented.
Planning Rationale: The proposed amendment and TDP do not provide policies, development standards or
iroposed infrastructure improvements that would address these General Plan policies.
Goal 3.1: To ensure long-term financial and economic sustainability for the Town of Oro Valley.
Policy 3.1D: A diverse economic base is desired to reduce Oro Valley's dependence on revenues from growth.
• Resort/arts enterprises are especially encouraged to employ Town residents at all levels and support local business
establishments.
• Hospital and health service campus locations shall be promoted.
• Retail/service expansion will be closely monitored to prevent over-commercialization or the creation of commercial
strips.
• Retirement community support industries, such as medical supplies or geriatric specialists, are encouraged.
• Public investments, such as capital improvements, shall support appropriate, desirable economic development.
• Eco-tourism shall be an option as that segment of the industry grows.
Policy 3.1E: Attract new retail and service businesses, especially those in under-represented categories, in order to
help reduce expenditure leakage.
Policy 3.1F: Maintain and enhance Oro Valley's residential/resort/recreation character.
Policy 3.1M: Specialty commercial development, similar to St. Phillips Plaza in Tucson, is encouraged in appropriate
locations.
'lanning Rationale: The existing Area A, with the 25 acres of commercially-zoned land, located across First
Avenue from two other commercial parcels (Rooney Ranch Areas E and F) and within walking distance from
the Rooney Ranch shopping centers (Areas B and D) positively addresses this policy. There are very few
undeveloped areas of Town that are zoned commercial. Commercially-zoned land is at a premium in the Town,
particularly when much of the Town's revenues needed for community services and infrastructure are supported
by sales tax and hotel tax. Area A, located next to a regional recreation facility (CDO Riverwalk and Wash,
Catalina State Park) and a major Town park, as well as high quality resorts, is a prime location for revenue-
generating commercial activities. The loss of this potential revenue, without mitigation (such as rezoning
similarly-located residentially-zoned land to commercial use), conflicts with this policy.
Goal 4.1: To promote high quality residential neighborhoods.
Planning Rationale: The proposed amendment, and accompanying TDP, would not provide as high quality a
residential neighborhood as one which preserves the natural hillsides and floodplains. Custom homes nestled
within the hillsides with views toward the mountains and access to the Wash would positively address this
General Plan policy.
Goal 8.1: To protect the Planning Area's natural attributes,which have been designated as a key community value.
Policy 8.1A: Aggressively ensure that damage caused by blading is repaired and returned to its natural state.
�Jolicy 8.1G: Indigenous (native desert) vegetation and riparian habitats should be maintained and enhanced where
possible.
Policy 8.1H: Require the protection and at worst case, transplantation of healthy native vegetation within a
development or to approved sites outside the project limits.
Policy 8.1I: Require the use of drought-tolerant vegetation and water-efficient irrigation systems where landscaping
and revegetation are implemented.
Policy 8.1K: Restrict the removal of gravel and other natural resources from washes and flood-prone areas for
commercial purposes.
Policy 8.1N: Mass grading is prohibited for all residential developments 2 RAC and under and strongly discouraged
throughout the community.
Planning Rationale: The proposed amendment and TDP would mass grade large portions (43.5 acres)of the
(76.5 acre) site, including significant portions of the site with natural slopes greater than 15 % which is
prohibited by the current PAD development standards. The proposed TDP would fill natural groundwater
recovery areas and floodplains with soil procured by leveling the site's natural hillsides.
General Plan Policies that the Proposed Project would Positively Address and the Planning Rationale:
Policy 1.1E: View protection shall be an essential aspect of Oro Valley's community design review and project
approval.
Policy 4.1A: Protect the integrity and aesthetic context of existing neighborhoods through the use of appropriate
buffers.
Policy 9.1D: All development proposals should attempt to arrange buildings, massing of buildings, and/or
arrangements of lots to preserve views from adjacent properties and streets while providing privacy for
residents.
Policy 9.1G: In order to maximize integration of the built environment with the natural environment, and minimize
distractions of the built environment, all new development proposals should incorporate means of
reducing the apparent size and bulk of buildings.
Planning Rationale: The Area Z development standards incorporate the siting design guidelines of Chapter 16
of ORZCR. In addition, the Area Z regulations limit the location of 2-story homes along the North First Avenue
frontage at both the Lambert Lane access road and the northern access road (see Section B.4. of the Area Z
regulations). This would reduce, but not eliminate or avoid, view blockage of the Site's prominent natural
ridgeline. Per the Area Z regulations, limiting building heights of lots located west of the prominent ridgeline
and north of Lot 139 to one-story and 18 feet would positively address this policy.
Policy 2.1A: Oro Valley's roadway network shall be developed with the proper amount of capacity to serve traffic
generated by the desired land use pattern.
Planning Rationale: The Project is expected to positively address this General Plan policy by generating traffic
that would result in cumulative traffic volumes on Lambert Lane and North First Avenue that would not exceed a
Jevel of Service "D"
Policy 2.1D: Build sidewalks, sufficient outside lane width, and provide other specific provisions for safe and convenient
use of arterials and collectors by bicyclists and pedestrians.
olicy 2.1E: Bike,vehicle and pedestrian conflicts are to be minimized through appropriate design standards.
Policy 2.3B: Bike paths should be constructed, where feasible, to separate bike and pedestrian traffic from motorized
vehicles in order to provide safe access to schools and parks.
Policy 2.3C: All new or reconstructed collectors and arterials should include sidewalks.
Policy 2.3D: Oro Valley should develop and implement a community open space network with trails.
Policy 2.4E: Sufficient buffer zones should be adopted for all land developed adjacent to arterials and collectors.
Policy 6.1A: Plan for the connection of open space, natural areas, parks, trails, bike paths, and recreation areas to
minimize conflicts with the environment.
Policy 6.1C: At the time of initial construction, trails are to be designated and signed by the developer in natural areas.
Policy 6.1D: All developments should link their recreation facilities and natural areas to the community open space
network where appropriate.
Policy 6.1E: Trails shall ultimately connect to public preserves and the regional trail network per the Eastern Pima
County Trails System Master Plan,where possible.
Policy 6.1F: Develop an integrated parks, open space, and trails system that will promote a sense of community
identity and high quality of life for the residents as well as wildlife habitat and movement corridors.
Policy 6.1H: Provide an interconnected multi-use trail system that provides opportunities for hiking, biking, and
equestrian users.
Policy 6.1I. Protect existing and establish new trail access points to major washes and regional preserves.
Policy 6.1J: Develop a bike paths system that is separate from the roadways and serves to interconnect various public
facilities such as schools,parks,trails, open space areas, etc.
Goal 6.3: To provide a broad range of recreational activities to serve the needs of all age groups and interests.
Planning Rationale: Section B.6. of the proposed Area Z development regulations provides recreation areas that
are dispersed throughout the subdivision and which are connected by roadways with sidewalks. Trail 328 is
shown on the Town's "Trail Opportunity Analysis"map as a "proposed high opportunity trail" (November 2001
Oro Valley Trails Task Force Report"). This trail travels through the Project Site in a north-south direction on
the eastern portion of the Site. The TDP does not show the trail alignment or improvement, although the PAD
Amendment "Area Z Development Regulations" call for the development of Trail 328 as a 15 foot wide, non-
motorized public recreation trail dedicated to the Town.
Attachment 7: Section 10-301 and 10-308, PAD Findings Analysis.
Section 10-301 provides the following criteria to be utilized in evaluating a PAD:
"A. To ensure that future growth and development which occurs is in accord with the adopted goals and elements of the
general plan and all planning policies of the Town."
The proposed PAD amendment's development standards for Area Z and the proposed TDP would conflict with numerous
substantial General Plan policies as described in Attachments 6 and 8 of this report.
"B. To encourage innovative site planning by providing:
1. Variety in individual lot sizes,
2. Variety in land uses,
3. Open space,
4. Preservation of natural topography,
5. Integrated circulation systems which provide for safe vehicular and pedestrian traffic interaction.
6. Solar design and water conservation features such as water harvesting, minimizing or eliminating use of
turf in landscaping, incorporating design features which enhance and protect solar access and providing
for solar orientation of structures."
The proposed Area Z development standards do not meet these objectives. Area Z would not (1) protect the natural
topography, particularly the numerous slopes of 25% or greater; (2) would not provide a variety of housing types; and (3)
would not provide adequate vehicular access to the abutting parcel to the north("cross-access")which facilitates "integrated
circulation systems"in the area.
;'ross-access to adjacent properties, in general,provides safer and more convenient routes for residents of the subdivision to
visit their neighbors as well as to travel to nearby neighborhood shopping destinations. Cross-access to the property to the
north of this site in the form of a collector street and at a location east of the prominent ridgeline, in addition to providing
safer and more convenient local travel, would facilitate the creation of a sense of"neighborhood" among this subdivision
and the subdivision-to-be to the north, rather than the isolation and "turn your back to your neighbor" design that the TDP
provides. Cross-access would induce residents of the Project to take alternate modes of travel, other than the automobile,to
visit neighbors and nearby commercial and public facilities,resulting in more beneficial, cumulative air quality impacts than
would a Project without cross-access.
The "cross access" scenario, described by the Town Engineer,would provide a collector street through the parcel (at a
location east of the ridgeline)that would eventually continue through the Kai-Capri property and connect to Palisades
Road. Driveways would not be permitted to connect directly to the collector road. All connections would be provided by
subdivision streets. The reason for preferring the cross-access with collector street scenario is that it provides a better
overall area transportation network to the area than the island scenario. The benefits of the cross-access scenario are
described on page 4 of the case report.
It is important to note, however,that if the Town Council prefers the island scenario a condition should be placed on the
action that no street connections may be provided to the Kai-Capri property. The reason for this is the potential for"cut-
through"traffic on a residential street through the Project would be high.
"C. To foster the safe and efficient use of the land."
The proposed Area Z land uses and development standards provide for a singular land use that of single-family, detached
homes. A more efficient use of land, and one which would be more sensitive to the site's natural topography, could include
attached"Patio"homes which would be"nestled"or"clustered"within the low points(saddle)of the site's natural hillsides.
"D. To facilitate greater efficiency in design and provision of adequate public services and infrastructure."
The proposed Area Z provides low-density single-family, detached homes in a centrally-located area of Town which is near
open space facilities and shopping. A more compact development could make more efficient use of the land, utilities,
safety services,roadways and other public infrastructure.
"E. To avoid the inappropriate development of lands and provide for adequate drainage and reduction of flood
damage."
The proposed amendments would mass-grade and level numerous natural hillsides to make way for roads and residential
building pads. The proposed amendment would allow, and the proposed TDP specifically proposes,the filling of the natural
groundwater recharge areas and floodplains with soil from leveling the natural hillsides on-site.
"F. To encourage patterns of land use which decrease trip length of automobile travel and encourage trip
consolidation."
"G. To increase public access to mass transit, bicycle routes and other alternative modes of transportation."
The proposed Area Z does not propose a mix of uses, density of use, or cross-access to adjacent properties that would
facilitate automobile trip reduction and make support of mass transit cost-effective. Please also see the discussion under
criterion B.
"H. To reduce energy consumption and demand".
The proposed Area Z would not particularly address this objective.
"I. To minimize adverse environmental impacts of development."
1'he proposed amendment, and accompanying TDP, would not minimize adverse environmental impacts to the site or to
down-stream development due to the alteration of natural hillsides, floodplains and groundwater recharge areas on site.
"J. To foster a rational pattern or relationship between land uses for the mutual benefit of the community."
The proposed Area Z land use and development standards do not provide a mixture of housing types for a diversity of
household types. It does not provide a buffer from the commercial use of the remnant Area A. Sections J and K. of the Area
Z development regulations do, however, require the developer to provide design solutions to mitigate potential noise and
light and glare impacts from the commercial development east of the CDO Wash (Rooney Ranch Area B with, among
others,Home Depot).
The proposed Area Z amendment would not provide commercial use which would provide a diverse tax base for the Town to
support community services and infrastructure.
"K To protect existing neighborhoods from harmful encroachment by intrusive or disruptive development. "
By filling in the CDO Wash floodplain, the proposed TDP may result in increased velocity of floodwaters to downstream
land areas which could wash out or spill over existing flood control facilities currently protecting those developments.
The Town is very concerned with loss of groundwater recharge areas. These natural groundwater recharge areas are an
important variable in meeting the Town's assured water supply for existing and anticipated development within the
Town. It is the position of the Oro Valley Water Utility (OVWU) that any existing recharge basin "preferably be left
intact when a property is developed". The proposed TDP would fill in and develop portions of the CDO Wash natural
groundwater recharge area.
'section 10-308, Required Findings.
A. Required Findings
The required findings function to assure that the purposes of the PAD zoning have been accomplished through a
given PAD proposal. In order to approve a PAD,the Town shall find that:
1. The PAD development is in accordance with the adopted Oro Valley General Plan and a minimum of 80%
of the applicable General Plan criteria, as outlined in Sec. 10-307 are satisfied.
The proposed PAD text amendment and TDP (the "Project") does not meet this standard, as described in Attachment 6 to
this report. The Project meets 18 or 54%of the 33 applicable criteria of Section 10-307. Of the 48 criteria found in Section
10-307, 15 are not applicable to the Project. However, with incorporation of the conditions of Exhibit A to this report, the
Project would meet the required criteria of Section 10-307.
2. The PAD demonstrates innovative design in site planning.
The Project does not demonstrate innovative design,particularly design that would(1)avoid altering natural land forms with
slopes greater than 25%; (2) avoid filling in floodplains and natural groundwater recharge areas; (3)provide adequate cross-
access to abutting residential property; (4) and provide "cluster" housing within the "saddles" (low points) of natural
hillsides.
3. The PAD fosters safe and efficient use of the land.
The Project proposes single-family detached dwellings rather than a mixture of detached and attached single-family homes
which responds to the site's natural topography. This can be viewed as a less intensive and less efficient use of land within
close proximity to major transportation corridors, shopping and recreation facilities. The current Area A standards more
Dsitively address this finding.
4. The development facilitates efficient design of public services and all infrastructure.
The Project would fill in floodplains as well as groundwater recharge areas. The Project would not provide adequate cross-
access to the property (and future neighborhood) to the north. This is not an efficient design of public services and
infrastructure.
S. The development provides for adequate drainage and reduction of flood damage.
As mentioned before, the Project would fill one and would re-align two natural jurisdictional washes, including a large
portion of the Site's CDO Wash floodplain. The Applicant has not provided sufficient information to determine what effect
this would have to downstream properties, or to the flood control measures on-site or across the Wash to the east(please see
October 23, 2003 letter from Pima County Department of Transportation and Flood Control District,provided as Attachment
8).
6. The PAD encourages reduction in automobile trip lengths and trip consolidation as measured against
development under conventional zoning.
Staff has consistently requested a cross-access collector street, located east of the site's prominent ridgeline, which would
connect the Project to the property to the north. The Applicant has consistently refused to provide this in the TDP and
instead has provided a minor street connection to the northern property line, located west of the ridgeline. Staff believes a
cross-access collector street, located east of the ridgeline and stubbed-out in the short-term would address Finding number 6,
whereas the current TDP design does not. Once the property to the north(Capri-Kai property)is developed,this stubbed-out
roadway would be connected to a circulation network that would provide access to a second traffic-light controlled
intersection to the north.
7. Public access to mass transit,pedestrian and bicycle circulation systems is provided and designed to assure
that pedestrians can move safely and easily to properties and activities in the site and in the neighborhood.
The Project PAD text amendment and TDP only shows "local street" designs with a 46 feet wide roadway with curb and
sidewalks each side. There are no standards for separate bicycle paths or for a (non-motorized) trail connecting residential
"pods" or clusters of homes to common open space areas or recreation areas. Separating bicycle paths from sidewalks and
thicular roadways is the preferred method of satisfying this finding.
8. The design and arrangement of elements of the site plan (e.g. Building construction, orientation and
placement; selection and placement of landscape materials, and/or use of renewable energy sources, etc.)
contribute to the overall reduction of energy use by the project as measured against development under
conventional zoning.
This Finding is not addressed in the Project standards.
9. The design and arrangement of elements of the site plan minimize adverse impacts to the existing natural
topography, natural water courses, existing desirable vegetation and views.
The Project conflicts with this Finding in that it would grade and level numerous slopes greater than 15% and 25%, would
fill floodplains and washes, and would remove substantial native desert vegetation.
10. The elements of the site plan display a rational relationship (e.g. Buildings, circulation, open space and
landscaping)between land uses for the mutual benefit of the community and neighborhood.
The Project does not provide a critical cross-access collector street for vehicles and pedestrians to the property to the north
which is very likely to be developed as a residential neighborhood. Although the Area Z standards require it, the Project
TDP does not show the connection to Town Trail No. 328 which would integrate the site to the regional recreational
facilities of the area.
11. The PAD protects, in a manner equal or superior to existing zoning, existing neighborhoods from harmful
encroachment by intrusive or disruptive development.
The Project provides a development of lesser density and lesser variety of land uses than the current Area A standards,
.lthough it provides a lesser level of protection of natural topography than the current PAD or than a generic R1-7 zoning
✓ould; this is not necessarily superior.
12. Overall, the entire PAD represents an improvement to living, work and recreational conditions superior to
that which would be produced by development under conventional zoning districts.
The Project proposes a development that is similar to a conventional R1-7 zoning except that the proposed development
standards would vary from OCZVR Chapter 10-Hillside Development and Chapter 15-Grading.
Attachment 8: Section 10-307, PAD General Plan Criteria Analysis.
Sec. 10-307 General Plan Criteria
The following criteria are derived from the adopted Oro Valley General Plan. All PAD applications shall be evaluated utilizing
these criteria. In order to approve a PAD, the Town Council must find 80% of the applicable criteria are adequately addressed in
the PAD plan and text documents. There are 33 criteria that are applicable to this Project; 15 or 45% are not addressed by the
Project while 18 or 54%of the applicable criteria are adequately addressed by the Project.
[The last column indicates whether or not the Project conforms to the General Plan Criteria: Y is yes it conforms;N is no it does
not conform;and N/A means the Project is neutral or the criterion is not applicable.]
Land Use Element
1. Varied types and intensities of development have been incorporated. N
2. Site analysis information completely supports the land use proposals contained in the N
PAD.
3. A mix of housing types, such as single family attached and detached,single family cluster N
homes,patio homes,townhouses and apartments,is incorporated in the PAD.
4. The PAD promotes clustered (average density) developments to protect environmentally N
sensitive areas.
5. Higher density or intensity developments abutting lower density or intensity areas include N/A
buffering and shall substantially mitigate any negative impacts.
6. Residential neighborhoods are afforded multi-modal access to, and are in close proximity Y
to,activity centers to minimize travel times.
7. Activity centers provide a wide range of appropriate services. N/A
8. The PAD protects natural features through transfer of development densities and similar N
strategies.
9. Office,technical and corporate employment facilities are scaled to the surrounding area. N/A
10. Campus-type employment is incorporated. N/A
11. Multi-family residential development, at moderate to higher unit densities, has access to N/A
arterial or collector roadways.
12. Multi-family (apartment or condominium) developments have planned-in recreational N/A
facilities and other amenities.
13. Recreational facilities and appropriate links to open space amenities are provided. Y
Transportation Element
14. The Oracle Road Corridor is de-emphasized for high intensity development. N/A
15. Bike lanes are included in all planned arterial improvements and on collectors deemed Y
appropriate in the development review process.
16. Homeowners associations are required to maintain pedestrian-bicycle paths, within Y
approved master-planned communities.
17. Bicycle parking facilities are provided. 1'
18. Safe pedestrian/bicycle access to schools and parks is provided within the boundaries of Y
the PAD.
19. Curvilinear residential streets patterns are incorporated. Y
20. Sidewalks or related pedestrian facilities are incorporated within neighborhoods. Y
21. All new roadway and future pedestrian-bicycle improvements meet public design Y
standards.
22. Park-and-ride lots are incorporated with planned facilities. N/A
23. Projects larger than 100 acres in size provide direct access to an arterial. N/A
Economic Development Element
24. A favorable fiscal impact analysis. N/A
Public Services and Facilities Element
25. School site planning has been addressed in large-scale planned communities. N/A
26. One elementary school site of at least 10 acres has been reserved within developments for N/A
every 500 elementary school level students forecasted to live within the development.
27. Park/school combination site dedications are incorporated. Y
Community Design Element
28. Building height and bulk are moderate to low intensity, in harmony with individual site Y
attributes.
29. Parking lots with greater than 20 car capacity are screened from adjacent uses and public N/A
thoroughfares.
Open Space/Recreation Element
30. Pedestrian,equestrian and bicycle trails are designated including picnic/rest areas. Y
31. Handicapped accessible facilities are provided to users. Y
32. Recreation and open space facilities are linked to the community open space network Y
where appropriate.
33. Gateway treatments are incorporated at appropriate locations along the open space N
network.
34. Neighborhood scale recreation (at a suggested standard of three acres per 1000 Y
population)and appropriate linkages to existing and planned trail systems are provided.
Natural Resources Conservation Element
35. The floodplains of washes with a discharge greater than 1000 cubic feet per second (cfs) N
during the 100 year flood event and associated riparian habitats are preserved as natural open space
except as stipulated in number 36.
36. Washes with a discharge greater than 100 cfs during the 100 year flood event and N/A
associated riparian habitats are preserved if vegetation and habitat quality are found to be unique by
the Planning and Zoning Commission and Town Council.
37. Hydrologic studies of washes greater than 100 cfs discharge during the 100 year flood N
event are provided which include effects on riparian habitats.
38. Only native plant materials and approved Southern Arizona Water Resources Association Y
plants are utilized.
39. Only floodplain compatible uses are proposed in flood prone areas. N
40. When erosion protection is required, environmentally sensitive alternatives including N
geotextiles or gunite containing integral desert colors are utilized as opposed to concrete lining of
water courses.
41. Indigenous (native desert) vegetation and riparian habitats are maintained and enhanced N
where possible.
42. Select native plant material which is to be transplanted within the development or to N
approved sites outside the project limits.
43. Mass grading techniques are minimized for project development N
Safety Element
44. Bike paths are constructed,where feasible and appropriate,to separate pedestrian and bike N
traffic from motorized vehicles in order to provide safe access to schools and parks.
45. The PAD adheres to the "Suggested Policies for Fire Management in the Wildland Urban N
Interface",published by the National Forest Service,May, 1990.
Cultural/Historic Element
46. A cultural resource survey has been performed where cultural/archeological resources are Y
determined likely to occur according to the Arizona State Museum.
47. The PAD provides for protection of cultural resources discovered during construction. Y
48. Archaeological sites are left generally undisturbed and not identified to the public. N/A
Attachment 9: Comparison of current PAD development standards and proposed Amendments.
Comparison of Rooney Ranch PAD Area A standards and the proposed Area Z standards.
Development Area A Proposed Area Z
Standard
Land Uses Area A allows single-family homes only in the 29.6 acre"sub- Area Z allows single-family homes throughout
area 4". the 76.5 acres.
Area A's sub-area 1 is a 25.18 acre land area that would allow
commercial uses or multi-family residential use. The proposed The PAD amendment would create Area Z with
amendment would reduce sub-area a to 3 acres;this would be the 152 single-family homes,resulting in a net loss
only remaining land within Area A. of about 7 acres of commercial space(in the
formerly larger sub-area 1)and from 250 to 350
The 2.83 acre sub-area 2 now allows neighborhood recreation dwelling units of multi-family housing in the
use;this would be eliminated. former sub-area 3.
The 21.86 acre sub-area 3 allows multi-family residential use;
this area would be eliminated.
The 29.61 acre sub-area 4 would also be eliminated.
Grading/Slope Area A must follow the PAD Grading Policies 2 and Sec.D Area Z would allow grading of slopes in excess
Protection Conceptual Grading Plan which varies from the proposed Area Z of 25%and would allow cuts and fill in excess
standards. In Area A,"no localized slope in excess of 15%may of 6 feet,or 8 feet with terracing,and in excess
be graded or disturbed,provided,however,that fill placed in of the maximum of 12 feet cuts,without
areas where development is permitted may be placed against meeting the provisions of Chapter 10 Hillside
15%slopes up to the elevations of North First Avenue as it falls Development or Chapter 15 Grading.
from north to south". The average cross-slope method of
measuring slopes shall not be used in identifying slope gradients
on site. "Slopes in excess of 15%in Area A maybe graded to
allow construction of the Lambert Lane loop road as shown,and
necessary drainage approved by the Town Engineer,but only to
the extent necessary for such construction and necessary
drainage related to the loop road and the major drainageway in
sub-area 4 and other drainage as approved by the Town
Engineer."
Recreation Area A would provide 5 acres of improved recreation land. Area Z would provide 2 acres of improved
Facilities recreational facilities.
Minimum Lot The minimum lot size of the sub-area 4 single-family zone is Area Z would have a 5,000 sq.ft.minimum lot
Size 8,000 square feet. size.
Front Set-Back The front set-back of the single-family home sub-area 4 is 20 Area Z would have a 10 foot front setback with
feet. a requirement that 20 feet be provided in front
of a garage to avoid cars parking in the sidewalk
space.
Design Area A must follow the Rooney Ranch PAD polices on Setbacks Area Z would adhere to Chapter 16 OVZCR;
Guidelines (Sec.4-A. of PAD requires 20 feet building setback from the corner lots would have a side setback of 10 feet
North First Avenue and Lambert Lane right of way);Building and lots with rear yards abutting side yards are
Height(Sec. S.A. of PAD allows for parking below grade in discouraged and,if provided, are provided
which case building heights can be measured as the distance additional vegetative screening and additional
between the top of the slab of the first enclosed floor to the top setbacks. 2-story homes are
of the exterior roof line of the building);and Architectural
Design Criteria(Sec.F of PAD).
Landscape Area A must follow the PAD Landscape Guidelines. Area Z would adhere to OVZCR Chapter 14
Standards
Attachment 10: Pima County Department of Transportation and Flood Control District Letter.
Oct .24 03 108: 14a DOT 740-6749
p 2
r.l
t
;�:' 'HT1 r;
d3r1o141
PIMA COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
201 NORTH STONE AVENUE,FOURTH FLOOR
TUCSON,ARIZONA 85701-1207
KURT WEINRICH.P.E. (520)740-6410
DIRECTOR FAX (520)620-1933
October 23,2003
Jim Hossley,P.E., Manager,Operations Division
Town of Oro Valley
I 1000N.La Canada Drive
Oro Valley,Arizona 85737
Re: Proposed Development Upstream of First Avenue along the Canada Del Oro Wash
Dear Mr.Hossley:
Thank you for allowing us to review the CLOMR-F report for Rooney Ranch Area"A"(prepared by the
WLB Group, September 25,2003). We appreciate this opportunity to assist the Town under our
Intergovernmental Agreement for major watercourses such as the Canada del Oro Wash. The following
comments and questions are offered:
General
The proposed improvements and encroachment into the Canada del Oro Wash 100-year floodplain is
adjacent to the main channel and the flood control levee owned by the Flood Control District. This levee
provides flood protection in Oro Valley for a significant portion of residential and commercial properties.
The Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA)regulates the floodplain for the Canada del Oro
Wash. Therefore,design and construction of floodplain encroachments must be in conformance with
FEMA requirements. Because of the flood control levee,any encroachment must maintain the existing
freeboard as provided along the flood control levee,and be consistent with FEMA's requirements of three
feet of freeboard for levees and four feet of levee freeboard upstream of bridges. If the freeboard
requirements are not maintained, it is possible that FEMA would designate a special flood hazard zone in
the areas currently protected by the flood control levee.
Levee Freeboard Issues
A FEMA-approved levee exists along the southern embankment of the Canada Del Oro Wash.
• The proposed encroachment must not jeopardize the freeboard requirements for the southern
levee,as defined in the National Flood Insurance Program Regulations(44 CFR §65 10(b)(1)).
Should the post-construction freeboard be Iess that what FEMA requires,areas to the south of the
levee could be added to the floodplain.
Floodplain Management Division • Telephone: (520)740-6350 • Fax: (520)740-6749
Planning • Management
Oct "24 03 08: 14a DOT 740-6749 p. 3
Jim Hossley, P.E.,Manager,Operations Division
Proposed Development Upstream of First Avenue along the Canada Del Oro Wash
October 24,2003
Page 2
• In order to properly address the levee freeboard issues,the elevation of the levee must be field-
surveyed. eld-
surveyed.
• Because of the nuances with the HEC programs,post construction models frequently have
different profiles than what was submitted with the proposed conditions. Therefore,the
developer must be responsible for corrections to the levee height should post construction
floodplain mapping indicate that sufficient freeboard is not provided.
• As noted above,the variance of floodplain modeling using HEC programs may indicate that
under present conditions,the existing levee freeboard does not meet the FEMA requirements.
Should that be the case,then the Flood Control District(District)will need to perform
maintenance to the levee. However,the District will not provide additional freeboard to the levee
to address the increases in base flood elevations due to the proposed development.
Report Review Issues
• The District could not perform a complete review of the report from WLB because the HEC-RAS
computer files were not included. Please have the engineer include the computer disk with the
next submittal. Our office reserves the right to provide additional comments based on our review
of the electronic data.
• The elevation datum must be provided.
• The report states one-foot was added to the beginning water surface elevation: FEMA requires
that changes in water-surface elevation be no greater than 0.5 feet at the limits of the area being
studied.
• A roughness coefficient of 0.035 appears to be too low considering the vegetation conditions.
Please have the engineer justify or modify the coefficients.
• Is the starting water surface elevation flowing below critical depth? If so,additional cross
sections/modeling may be necessary to ensure a good blend to the FEMA profile. I recommend
starting the water surface profile further downstream to establish a good blend point.
• Because we now have digital Flood Insurance Rate Maps,digital shape files are required by both
Pima County and FEMA. Please have the engineer submit ArcView Shape files for the proposed
map revisions. Pima County can provide the existing shape files,if requested.
• In the very near future,digital FIRM panels will include aerial photography. FEMA has
informed the County that LOMR work maps must include photography and must be digitally
included in LOMR submittals.
Oct 24 03 08: 15a DOT 740-6749 p.4
Jim Hossley,P.E., Manager,Operations Division
Proposed Development Upstream of First Avenue along the Canada Del Oro Wash
October 24,2003
Page 3
Sediment'Transport for the Canada Del Oro Wash
When the Oro Valley levee was designed,one of the reasons the northern portion of the channel was not
bank protected was due to the potential adverse impact on sediment transport. Please have the engineer
submit a sediment transport analysis demonstrating that the encroachment will not induce aggradation or
degradation problems.
Tributary Channel
• This office has not seen the hydrology report for the tributary flow coming from the north. if the
100-year peak discharge equal or exceed 3,000 cfs,then the drainage infrastructure would
become the County's responsibility to maintain according to the IGA,therefore,we would need
to review and approve the design and maintenance access easements.
• The proposed design concentrates flow on top of a PimaCounty sewer easement. Pima County
Wastewater Management should be consulted in the design of these improvements.
Other Items
• The post construction LOMR must include the same multiple profiles as indicated in the Flood
Insurance Study.
• Will the fill be bank-protected? 'If so,the IGA will require the County to maintain the
infrastructure. Bank protection plans and maintenance access easements must be submitted to the
County for review and approval.
• Does the encroachment pose a 404 issue?
Please call me at 740-6350,if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
R. "Terry"Hendricks,CFM,Chief Hydrologist
Floodplain Management Division
RTH/tj
cc: Suzanne Shields,P.E., Deputy Director-Flood Control District
Jerry Curless,Manager,Floodplain Management Division
Attachment 11: Required First Avenue Improvement Project
Easements Related to Condition Number 11 of Exhibit A, OV9-03-03
---,-.----....*-,.-..,-•7i.v,',rm"...K.I.f......X.W.....• .., ,,
/8 1 .- - .;,-*,,,,-.• 4.' . .
• I,
A ...\\_, i/331- ,.,
a,v
I s-l
v-/i.
i-/
^p
`, 1 33, 00'09 ib3INrii k r .--.k„:.,,:d;,1 ,, =r 7-�
1 + Zi / iO
.o--ui/'
i
„........-,......_....., .....\ \ .. ili...virl I ..,,.40- 1/ ,:of:it
----Tzt,....,-'7,---- 0' \ C i ' f 4; ,e,,.., , ,,,
, , .,,„,.._. • . , ,,....... ,
\ j i Tyr:_.•._?�:ti \‘•`\ /^ •
i. '• ,,,
:„ A f ,
I61•20.00.Ri o :',":::!,-E5'" ;1`,::,
rr; ` �\ ' A i ' `
259/29 R � ��: / # 'tai
/6!•4011,LT I 1 r '..••.'.._:�=•,\�` •1 ! , A �r i l
259234 i ! :., ',:-'''''\'\
. '\' •``1` ' / ` /pyrmAir
' r , 11 y 1 i
. . *,,\\ \)„,,;.)'rlik-', t,,. ,). /0.04'.', ti, ; "li*--/h I.1 .
TA t \ 3 ;,. , / ,.. :-,,„\\\\•;,1•!lik, , '' \,),./01 itgi......-1..-„./ if 1
--P3---
\\\\\
t 1}` \ 1 I 1,11
' ;�li i�ii,fF•,,,s.:••••• \ ;:i.*1'11,6,,.,‘.., ” 1 It --*/' 4,11 _./.....---' t/ ...1/1 1 .
r e.�;/ 1/....... • 1
=1 \ ! i ,1 , \ IIiI ly!! •\ I ' ' i 1 j I I j j I :\ i {f F ,+ WJj�illi i1.j ) '4
,*`'..—7'1—
. ^f i �,.,, ;
VPT•l62'70�1 RT II ��:�; '.-1//lt�/� ;/////f/i�' //,. {'� _---11• 2 �•�,�r ' 1
VPT6•I \ I ; /,/Y Kl/,0 %/j0 l/ F111 *•'�'
t VPT •I1�I ] I i / +: i'��i" i..w i f5 !. :�' ii
'l62• f
S3 I ''''' //lit,/ }°1 ` � tat.„'
•firVA 7.*2+
____ i.
2597 Ie.
1,, l ,b i i ! ,..-- //.4'..
, 4 is �� A.,'..:1'
, r. ,_. 'J la r f it
,ii
, //71 ,/ ., iv,,../ ,,,.. ,li 1- akr4
„,,,
IIO012O ! I /i %r 7/ t�, „, r, ! • I i` f
rJ(i11
7'2 I ' ,..4.-.,,,:•.-.:<.]' .1 t I • •
, :!. i .,, 1 ,.,,/,/, .,,.. 7),,_,...i jilt ,” ii 0, ...k. I . :-..:.,,,.:.!:,)/,,....,..
dt
,. r %.l.'''«! (fF, ! � fty { fjl' � �..J r 11
.''-. N,1-4
11
.! it-° '/'' .. WI:.1 ,11i i ,-A. .,.:'''''•-,.....-'{, ; 1 i
11
11 A1.:: 4 I 11 1
• .j/
I ,:?, !,) 1,11 V ',4/ r .§,/,0 ,::!..4. No 1 ,..,;„,# /
c, ;.,
' 0 \\
/ , ' v.ii,' ,f i t
%.'
R+ 1 I M :,_, ! 1.11;1 FI 1 -,,..1'
1 .•_ , ) +n I 11
\ g'�. •;f 1j.1; 'il�J��4+�� • n F!.; •� / ‘7-56/4\
• ,
\ ,g
t\ �� i I i j ! I/�` lir j�f J ,`` I/ :, d� � \.....
t 1 I j I 1 i 1 fir' !� �''R .---..f. '_ -•'�_ I
•
"__`>_ 1 •`� I i I ' g
n r ./, {i(` ;• i". t( II\ ir 2 / ir,.? ' \‘'ll ,.Vili 'i f:' -.' 14. -,. i r• '' )e`) ill
F�
i iei' II1, i( ,,. I
V I � I ( 'r ',/.1t,1 t y
,�.l `/ l,y'IIt7�` p�
2 \ Pi I ' r ,',..7r:.•
y f,' ! 1I' 1. Y `� 71‘,-----'.X
i \ i 'r j 1' .I y
Rl I 1 �''',./1/
.,.,i r/
;. .4
/' �'1I,N / t ,,,f F . r 1 ' , //-\.•
l/ t., i,- -i.i.-.^.j-', I;
,r..
'' 71 ' .,:, -t:„-- 1 :':-.-/ ';`,.'''".-9. ' litif :'',-. ., T.1 : i, , is,, .......„ i
a. 1 ,... .-4..., '''-kri...-- '-47 .i----<. .: .A. 4s)
,,
—)\-, —,,
1
II
\\,,, _ ,
,
,1 4 am\ol,t 1 1 ‘,„ ♦ + /411f
, 1r,3 kIt i 11
ill .
i 1 1
i , , kse.___..„, ,.,,,;7.,.._ I, lb $0.-- viiii•a" 1 i"', . ' ; , ----------
' I// AIWA 414,1, Ift ' s' 'IL, ''''''''
111, ` 14 1 I ; ._ 1 I,,L-71r,0.1111114W..4.1$:411,11/44,., -' -illti
r' ....v16-',4 ,,,jai #4110. 41,41,...,•,_ .., I
c9 z
�I� �� l`'nom \ I ''%,,:...-..4.0..tr.,..
\\ '\ t, ! ! N, t. /,�/ ! 7,, ,e1110.::: ::._:-„,.:/S�}, _ I
y --ir 1!: e
I ! i ,..)1...,, ,, . irp.1:.:„..,,..,,..,r tie% ,,,N-•--........'-----::::-:::::----•.'.
3:, _ i \ �/' ' :i.',;. 'tel'r! r�r'.'.... _...._,.:,` r1
' V ,---:::.„'. ..:::.:2.':' :• -.-• :- I" 'i'
Lqj
E SNE 1----\- -.7----'‘. �1
r23Z •
i
F• 0 j.
°—� gi
�® b� b `�tz'' �1�+� rt, sem' S PI
ii
�, i k k 11 o` , „1o2 , o; -, ,,,
r' 8� ass a '& r,4 r, A A A n '-'o ng3 020 db4n O ��t pot,?.,,,, 4 t 2 b, f-:',N, , ..,? N, 3,4; 4,, m o i.
's$-. -. L 4 , A A R ., �,t ,It 4 s ';t '^ `ate
agog& � pc s , g �b � � o A !, '#y r Q� 'b
rk
',,, t 2 r-p, ol min
'
4 1PL) ',,''
I11
!'i'
k ,., . ,�1,
' _-__~~-__~ _
_~ -'~~~~~~�'�~
~
� __'__
g _-w N -� �-
N --_ _'_ ,_.~_ _._.
I
r
' ' t 1\
. .., ..,....,... .., . N. 1 1 ,,, _
\\ I I 1 Z I I ` :,\•`:1:x3•
1 ! 1 1/....,.„-:.,..„.(4.--k-cf.-k.,-:::k7,...\t.
1 R-Ti(445.,,,,. ::::::,,,,,- ,---,,,-,
1 1 ' ,/,,I( .\
•
...
I I `I - 11y14f j ., ,`
1 j. : ' L` i I i' Mi-------f!' ..
J08.5953 i 1.43X U. , 1 I i .;' ' i.`� I!11
-LSBX RLI 30B 5953.2,57.90 , fir: y I� >„.1,
MATCH EX/STI ` i f �j,• r`>"... 1.. ,-, .t: 'Ni, c I, ' ..------.L.,' _
s i r 'CII' ( -"r
309•17D0.R1&Lf i I A w, 1 5\ SS I 3TC';i If
Ir -4-;-.,„..
�;__.J
1.-,4.11411,1L- rzi, 0,` /77=`:--,-'=-
, firm
II,
imi'::-...).7.1
. III� 1��1tl+ i itt` II I� "- �1
�'�' i as " ` 1�1�1�it y' ��
i I I , 71 t1 (�it + L ..�r.. U4'\ Ir 1 �'�`, ,�
, \ , ,\,..,•NN\-\\,. .,,,
I- il\' 1 ‘..•), :.,:_.:i.. I ...--
0 11 , ,1 / 'I' ..-.f.-i,:g., i ,' k•N: --••••.,ckA,\...,,, \______
; j i il 1 il .. 1 i i I_•1 ,•1,-1 „,,,,,,:„._.. _ ,..
i1 ii lo ,..: 1,1 ,'....,.1,-.--k.,.i .7... :-,..1.--,.,*.'''''. '•,. ..`"7,'•':,, ,,_.:'
, / I,— Ill'A•' I ...1.1,..1., .i F s) '.lif''t' , .:V,
\ 1,,.\ (l'1 -..:• ''''11,1- 11:4:','Ilr'L ' I ' \''''''''
'•-k) i I.• `''' '''r-:'1 ' \ 1 i k',', \\ N..
?'"""\. \ i \\ '1 -'
N,' 1 , v •1 -t is,,i: 4 ,,; \�'�
, r \s\ i ) I • ' -."--" i , , ,\ '‘,., , N‘N.,
1
44, r/ \''',A I 1111 , "1 I''-i1;1-',„4.1' 1 4,,..1' n.,..ir\- ,,s:',','.-ks„,\
o
i t 1 1' :1: i i I I '1"4it(' Ill, I I
\'- . )
� II� kY w 111g1
t ;%0(..,;f:i.:: -A i .4. '.',
1 (�;� � •a�:" r'td�..,i,• IIk 1 .i' .I , a
tri' L.a.
g i
p/v.IV
\ \ 2 4 1'lin. lir.k,-'. ::''''.:1 , ;:l 7±, .
4 ) I ) il I'I I 1 :lb:I.''''. 'A.',',; ..4 j. , 0 <
1 f I I i•r
i I ,,,,.„ 4a,i4
1 i 7,-;,:...-.1 -7/
#: ` ,oma -1 214
• •
I i 1 PW•3/3.7450 .• _ 41 li•,' %. I 1II, si ,11 ��
I i ; r , 2.59/!4 ! j -' '‘1'3h11,4,-4(.;,:,...:1";;;:;11)4,
� �®"c C.. 1 (r
),ii -
i_p„.......,:t.a.,---......
1 •
tgiION
1� C �
3/4.4964 .059X U. VP !��►.,t ,,,,,,o, ,'' •• #. c;
3/4- RL 314 4950 �.►,r' �
'26,GRADE BRE•1 --."'ea _____
i:$ ..- s , ,. i__„ N
-IBX , ,
T
JjJ(1re,,,,,„%,,,,,-,,v-1,......_
„�+
•
14: R 1; 3/5.:016.4__�..r�.�� IN 1 FIRST AVE _ `=I �- s:....� {< sZ
l55.63JI,�A7 RTFIRSTE ..:fi • ►i :1- _ -___ , 1-`
{� 258778.�RADE BREAK -�” , ,,����II,,����1111��''��
i:gz
lli
0 rz o y 1 _.._•_...._..1......._ y,,,- } rr,,t,rx4,a,,,,,,..... M14 :;Ty .:i
A
�_ -------- - __—..:�=�.:may_ - .
•
'^ cN --' 315.90 a RT -._... .__ ` i j ---=_ � _
js•i Azp
_l�
„
'1
r'
•
t '
k7 Fil
? ../L
�'1 77/ " • ® 1
CD
r fi` ``
* 1 Z
1,1 4
i ,,,,, t.,
...„
0
O ® ® ©© Olr 0 0 W Qo ao(+d —y .- ` aoil , � AQ � W 4Q thynngf- , °,aoD-1). .9 ti N tN A ZqZGZA .A 1 l�C
;_,q4
CA
r^m n 0; . 1it– , p� � z�r'' 'zi! �t X g _ NN� ,v :
Cti ' r X V, (ix
i ri ;k1', r''''''
�A 853 $-+ �gj �hl O ^ t A r�Ia, N� !r!-, p�
R1 fr�I O 2
\Kc OA—
COMPLIANCE WITH OVZCR §§ 10-307 AND 10-308
Comment/Response
§ 10-307 General Plan Criteria
The following criteria are derived from the adopted Oro Valley General Plan. All PAD
applications shall be evaluated utilizing these criteria. In order to approve a PAD, the Town
Council must find 80% of the applicable criteria are adequately addressed in the PAD plan and text
documents. All absolute criteria (shown in bold typeface) must be met by the proposed PAD.
1. Varied types and intensities of development have been incorporated.
Parcel Z of the Rooney Ranch PAD is part of a 290-acre PAD with a mix of residential (Parcel Z),
open space, commercial, and office uses. Parcel Z is-an amendment to Area A of the original PAD
and, when analyzed as part of the entire PAD, satisfies this requirement.
2. Site analysis information completely supports the land use proposals contained in the PAD.
It does.
3. A mix of housing types, such as single family attached and detached, single-family cluster
homes,patio homes, townhouses and apartments, is incorporated in the PAD.
In the overall PAD, Area Z is the only residential area. Although the original PAD did incorporate
a mix of housing, the current market conditions and the residents have made it clear that single-
family detached housing is the only acceptable form of housing.
4. The PAD promotes clustered(average density) developments to protect environmentally
sensitive areas
We have effectively clustered the homes, utilizing small lot sizes, in order to preserve 40 percent of
the Property in its natural state and preserve hillsides visible from North First Avenue.
S. Higher density or intensity developments abutting lower density or intensity areas include
buffering and shall substantially mitigate any negative impacts.
The only existing commercial development is to the south and Area Z is buffered to the south by the
CDO Wash, an 800 foot natural buffer. There is a 600 foot natural buffer from the edge of bank
protection to the Property line on the east. To the north is residential zoned property, and to the
west is North First Avenue. The PAD document, Development Regulations, §§ D.2, J, and K
address buffer yards (25 feet) along North First Avenue and lighting and noise mitigation to
adjacent uses.
6. Residential neighborhoods are afforded multi-modal access to and are in close proximity to,
activity centers to minimize travel times
Area Z is located across the wash from commercial and office development. There is a sidewalk
and multi-use lane along North First Avenue that will connect and encourage walking biking to the
commercial development.
7. Activity centers provide a wide range of appropriate services
In the overall PAD, there are commercial-node activity centers that offer office and commercial
uses, including coffee shops, banking, etc.
149550.1
Comment/Response
8. The PAD protects natural features through transfer of development densities and similar
strategies.
This property is entitled for a much denser residential development. We have designed the project
to preserve 40 percent as natural open space. Therefore, the density has been
clustered/transferred to certain areas to protect the natural open space and natural topography
where visible from North First Avenue.
9. Office, technical and corporate employment facilities are scaled to the surrounding area
Not applicable for Area Z.
10. Campus-type employment is incorporated
Not applicable for Area Z.
11. Multi family residential development, at moderate to higher unit densities, has access to
arterial or collector roadways.
Multi family residential has been removed from Area Z in response to the market and neighbor
concerns. Therefore, this is not applicable.
12. Multi family (apartment or condominium) developments have planned-in recreational
facilities and other amenities.
See above/not applicable.
13. Recreational facilities and appropriate links to open space amenities are provided.
We have provided 4 recreational facilities throughout the development that will be interconnected
by sidewalks andlor trails for easy access. A 15-foot access to Trail#328 will be provided and
dedicated to the Town. We will also be working with the Town to improve the existing Trail#328
on the property.
I. TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
14. The Oracle Road Corridor is de-emphasized for high intensity development.
Not applicable.
15. Bike lanes are included in all planned arterial improvements and on collectors deemed
appropriate in the development review process.
There are no collectors or arterial roadways required or needed in this development. We are
providing 28 feet of pavement per Oro Valley cross-sections. Although a multi-use path is not
included, the amount of traffic and width of the road will provide safe biking opportunities. The
local roads feed into North First Avenue arterial, which has such paths.
16. Homeowners associations are required to maintain pedestrian-bicycle paths, within
approved master-planned communities.
Acknowledged.
2 149550.1
Comment/Response
17. Bicycle parking facilities are provided.
We will be providing bicycle racks at the 4 recreational areas.
18. Safe pedestrian bicycle access to schools and parks is provided within the boundaries of the
PAD.
Sidewalks are provided on both sides of all roadways for safe pedestrian access to all recreational
areas. There are no schools. Bicycles will be able to ride in the roadways safely due to minimal
traffic on the local roadways. The nearest park is along Lambert Lane. Once Lambert is
improved, there will be sidewalks and multi-use paths from this residential development to the
park.
19. Curvilinear residential street patterns are incorporated.
They are curvilinear.
20. Sidewalks or related pedestrian facilities are incorporated within neighborhoods.
Sidewalks are provided on both sides of all streets in the development.
21. All new roadway and future pedestrian-bicycle improvements meet public design standards.
They do.
22. Park-and-ride lots are incorporated with planned facilities.
Not applicable.
23. Projects larger than 100 acres in size provide direct access to an arterial.
Not applicable
II. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT
24. A favorable fiscal impact analysis.
This project will generate just under$1 million in fees to the Town. Based on the fee analysis in
Wednesday, November 19, newspaper related to Town fees, the Town will generate $39,000 in
building fees for the homes, $339,264 for water hookup, and$443,840 for roadway impact fees.
Total is $822,104. This does not include any construction-related taxes or other fees. The addition
of these homes will also contribute to a housing development base for Oro Valley Town Centre and
Steam Pump Village.
III. PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES ELEMENT
25. School site planning has been addressed in large-scale planned communities.
Not applicable.
26. One elementary school site of at least 10 acres has been reserved within developments for
every 500 elementary school level students forecasted to live within the development.
Not applicable. Using the school district's 0.90 students per household calculation, this
development will only generate approximately 137 students.
3 149550.1
Comment/Response
27. Park/school combination site dedications are incorporated.
We have created 4 recreation areas to serve the proposed development, which satisfies the current
Code requirements for recreation areas. No park or school site is necessitated by this
development.
IV. COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
28. Building height and bulk are moderate to low intensity, in harmony with individual site
attributes.
Building height is permitted to be 2 stories or 26 feet. However, acknowledging the site attributes,
all buildings visible from North First Avenue are required to be 1 story and 18 feet in height.
Further, to break up the bulk of buildings,floor plans and elevations shall not be repeated on the
same street without at least a 3-lot separation. Roof mounted equipment shall be screened from
view, and colors must blend with the surrounding colors and topography. Also,front/side lot
abutting is discouraged. When it does occur, the side yard setback is larger with enhanced
vegetation.
29. Parking lots with greater than 20 car capacity are screened from adjacent uses and public
thoroughfares
Not applicable.
V. OPEN SPACE/RECREATION ELEMENT
30. Pedestrian, equestrian and bicycle trails are designated including picnic/rest areas.
We have provided sidewalks throughout the development. The 40 percent open space is accessible,
but no equestrian or bike trails have been provided per staff request. Bicycles can use the
roadway, and equestrians, bikes, and pedestrians will have access to Trail 328 as improved.
31. Handicapped accessible facilities are provided to users.
All sidewalks and recreation areas will be handicapped accessible.
32. Recreation and open space facilities are linked to the community open space network where
appropriate.
We will be providing a dedicated 15-foot access to the Town's Trail#328. We will also be
improving the existing trail on our property. Trail 328 interconnects to the community open space
network.
33. Gateway treatments are incorporated at appropriate locations along the open space network.
Not applicable.
34. Neighborhood scale recreation (at a suggested standard of three acres per 1000 population)
and appropriate linkages to existing and planned trail systems are provided.
Area Z proposes 152 homes. Assuming 3 people per residence (standard is 2.6), this equals
456 people. We are providing 2 acres minimum of improved recreation facilities, well exceeding
the required 3 acres per 1,000 population.
4 149550.1
•
Comment/Response
VI. NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION ELEMENT
35. The floodplains of washes with a discharge greater than 1000 cubic feet per second(cfs)
during the 100 year flood event and associated riparian habitats are preserved as natural
open space except as stipulated in number 36.
Although we are encroaching into 5 acres of the CDO Wash floodplain as currently mapped by
FEMA in the southern area, we are processing a CLOMR, which would remove this area from the
floodplain. We can only develop in this area with an approved CLOMR. Therefore, we will not be
developing within the 100-year floodplain once we have CLOMR approval. Further, the 5-acre
area is not a Town mapped riparian area.
There is also a wash along the east side of the property ("Eastern Wash"), which discharges
greater than 1,000 cfs. We are not disturbing the Eastern Wash.
36. Washes with a discharge greater than 100 cfs during the 100-year flood event and associated
riparian habitats are preserved if vegetation and habitat quality are found to be unique by
the Planning and Zoning Commission and Town Council.
Other than the CDO Wash and the Eastern Wash, there are two smaller washes on the property.
Neither of these washes contains unique vegetation and habitat quality. There are no cottonwoods,
willows, or other unique riparian vegetation. The washes contain typical xeroriparian vegetation,
such as mesquite, palo verde, and desert scrub.
37. Hydrologic studies of washes greater than 100 cfs discharge during the 100-year flood event
are provided which include effects on riparian habitats.
This is required as part of the plat and will be done at that time.
38. Only native plant materials and approved Southern Arizona Water Resources Association
plants are utilized.
Per staff request, we are complying with the OVZCR approved plant list.
39. Only floodplain compatible uses are proposed in flood prone areas.
As long as appropriate bank protection is in place, single-family residential uses are appropriate
where proposed. We cannot construct until FEMA approves the bank protection.
40. When erosion protection is required, environmentally sensitive alternatives including
geotextiles or gunite containing integral desert colors are utilized as opposed to concrete
lining of water courses.
We are not going to concrete-line the watercourses. We will be using soil cement, which blends in
aesthetically with the surrounding desert. We are also using rock rip-rap to provide a natural-
looking wash that matches what the Town approved on the other side of the wash.
41. Indigenous (native desert) vegetation and riparian habitats are maintained and enhanced
where possible.
Forty percent of the development will remain natural open space. In addition, when we do our
native plant preservation plan, our goal is to maintain as much existing vegetation and transplant
(where required) on site.
5 149550.1
Comment/Response
42. Select native plant material which are to be transplanted within the development or to
approved sites outside the project limits.
Acknowledged, and we are transplanting on site, not outside the project limits.
43. Mass grading techniques are minimized for project development.
Unfortunately, the costs and topography of this site required mass grading. However, we have
established within the PAD mitigation measures successfully implemented in Rancho Vistoso and
the same standards approved by the Town in the Oro Valley Town Centre PAD.
VII. SAFETY ELEMENT
44. Bike paths are constructed, where feasible and appropriate, to separate pedestrian and bike
traffic from motorized vehicles in order to provide safe access to schools and parks.
Separate bike paths on the local roads are not required per the Town's cross-section and are not
appropriate. The amount of traffic on the local roads and the 28 feet of pavement are sufficient for
safe bike riding.
45. The PAD adheres to the "Suggested Policies for Fire Management in the Wildland Urban
Interface",published by the National Forest Service, May, 1990.
We adhere to this.
VIII. CULTURAL/HISTORIC ELEMENT
46. A cultural resource survey has been performed where cultural/archaeological resources are
determined likely to occur according to the Arizona State Museum.
The preliminary resource survey is in the PAD document, and no cultural/archeological resources
have been found.
47. The PAD provides for protection of cultural resources discovered during construction.
If something is found during construction, we are required by the State Historic Preservation
Office to provide adequate protection.
48. Archaeological sites are left generally undisturbed and not identified to the public.
Not applicable.
§ 10-308 Findings—Specific and Required
As a basis of approval or conditional approval for a PAD District, the Planning and Zoning
Commission and Town Council shall make the following required findings. Any or all of the
specific findings are optional and shall be applied on a case by case basis.
A. Required Findings
The required findings function to assure that the purposes of the PAD zoning have been
accomplished through a given PAD proposal. In order to approve a PAD, the Town shall find that:
6 149550.1
•
Comment/Response
1. The PAD development is in accordance with the adopted Oro Valley General Plan and a
minimum of 80%of the applicable General Plan criteria, as outlined in Sec. 10-307 are
satisfied.
Of the 48 General Plan criteria outlined in Section 10-307, 35 are applicable. This proposal meets
30 of the 35, which is 86 percent—over the 80 percent requirement.
2. The PAD demonstrates innovative design in site planning.
The entire PAD encompasses 260-acres and provides a wide mix of development with an
innovative mix of land uses, architectural treatments,-and layout. As to Parcel Z, single-family
detached residential is clearly the Town's preferred development. The PAD incorporates all of the
Town's innovative architectural suggestions and then goes further. Many of the DRB and Town-
preferred architectural treatments (garages, varying elevations, etc.) have been incorporated as
requirements in the PAD. Although we are only required to leave 20 percent natural open space,
we have left double that by clustering homes.
3. The PAD fosters safe and efficient use of the land.
We believe it does. Circulation is safe, based on the Traffic Impact Analysis. We are providing a
much less dense development than currently entitled. The development also efficiently utilizes
existing infrastructure— roads, dry and wet utilities.
4. The development facilitates efficient design of public services and all infrastructure.
The development efficiently utilizes existing infrastructure, and the only public services designated
are the roadways, which are both safe and efficient/built to Town standards.
S. The development provides for adequate drainage and reduction of flood damage.
We will provide adequate drainage and reduction of flood damage. Per Town Code, we will accept
off-site flows, and flows generated by development of the site within drainage channels and basins
on site we will remove from the site in a safe and efficient manner.
6. The PAD encourages reduction in automobile trip lengths and trip consolidation as
measured against development under conventional zoning.
The location of this residential development near the commercial/Town Centre concept with
sidewalks and multi-use paths encourages pedestrian and bicycle use. It will also reduce
automobile trip lengths and encourage trip consolidation.
7. Public access to mass transit,pedestrian, and bicycle circulation systems is provided and
designed to assure that pedestrians can move safely and easily to properties and activities in
the site and in the neighborhood.
We have provided pedestrian sidewalks on both sides of all streets within the development. There
are sidewalks and multi-use paths along North First Avenue to facilitate safe and easy movement to
adjacent commercial, office, parks, and recreation areas within the site. The nearest mass transit
is on North First Avenue and Oracle Road, and there is easy pedestrian and bicycle access.
7 149550.1
•
Comment/Response
8. The design and arrangement of elements of the site plan (e.g. Building construction,
orientation, and placement; selection and placement of landscape materials, and/or use of
renewable energy sources, etc.) contribute to the overall reduction of energy use by the
project as measured against development under conventional zoning.
We have done our best to place homes in a north south orientation. We will also place landscape
materials—specifically shade-type trees— along the west and south sides of the lots to shade homes
for energy conservation.
9. The design and arrangement of elements of the-site plan minimize adverse impacts to the
existing natural topography, natural watercourses, existing desirable vegetation, and views.
Forty percent of the property will remain natural open space, including vegetation. We will also
transplant as much viable vegetation as possible, entirely on site. We are not encroaching on the
floodway of the CDO Wash. There is an existing topographic top-of-bank along the north side of
the wash. Our development does not encroach. Instead, we are providing bank protection
identical to the south side of the wash to modify the 100-year floodplain maps to build some of the
homes. We are also not grading any slopes visible from North First Avenue and are extensively
mitigating those slopes we do encroach.
10. The elements of the site plan display a rational relationship (e.g. Buildings, circulation,
open space, and landscaping) between land uses for the mutual benefit of the community
and neighborhood.
Parcel Z is the residential component of the 260-acre Rooney Ranch PAD. It has been designed to
provide safe and efficient access to the other land uses in the PAD. The Traffic Impact Analysis, as
approved by the Town, acknowledges the circulation rationale. Forty percent of Parcel Z is open
space, and we will comply with the OVZCR for landscaping. The recreation areas are spaced
throughout the site, with easy access. There are opportunities for entrance signage, and one of the
entrances opens to a recreation area.
11. The PAD protects, in a manner equal or superior to existing zoning, existing neighborhoods
from harmful encroachment by intrusive or disruptive development.
The only existing neighborhood is west of North First Avenue (Canada del Oro Estates), and those
neighbors are ecstatic about this proposal. The parcel is buffered to the south by the 800 foot
CDO Wash and to the east by a 600 foot natural open space buffer.
12. Overall, the entire PAD represents an improvement to living, work, and recreational
conditions superior to that which would be produced by development under conventional
zoning districts.
We believe it does. Parcel Z is a part of the entire Rooney Ranch PAD, which has already
developed as a commercial, office, town center area. We are now providing the homes(single-
family detached as requested by neighbors) to support the remainder of the PAD, encourage
pedestrian bicycle access, and limit vehicle uses.
8 149550.1
Comment/Response
B. Specific Findings
In addition to required findings, the Town may wish to make supplementary specific findings
relevant to individual PAD applications. Specific findings may include, but are not limited to, the
following:
1. The development is compatible with, and sensitive to, the immediate environment of the site
and neighborhood relative to density, scale, bulk, and building height.
The entire purpose of this PAD amendment is to reduce the density, scale, and bulk of the current
entitlement to address neighbor concerns and to make the development compatible with the
immediate environment. We have also limited the height of homes to 18 feet/1 story where visible
from North First Avenue.
2. Conflicts that exist between the proposed development and the surrounding land uses have
been effectively mitigated in the planned area development.
This has been accomplished through appropriate buffer yards and extensive conversations with
existing neighbors.
3. The project is designed so that the additional traffic generated does not have significant
adverse impact on surrounding development, or the development has detailed plans to
mitigate the adverse conditions.
The Traffic Impact Analysis demonstrates this development will have no to minimal impact on
North First Avenue and has safe internal circulation.
4. The project contains known areas of natural or geological hazard(e.g. unstable or
potentially unstable slopes,flood, etc.) or soil conditions unfavorable to urban development,
and special precautions have been taken to overcome those limitations or these areas have
been set aside from development.
The geotechnical analysis will be accomplished during platting. If known areas of hazard or soil
conditions exist, precautions will be taken.
5. The project will conform to applicable local, state, and Federal water quality standards,
including, but not limited to, erosion and sedimentation, runoff control, and prohibited solid
wastes and hazardous substances.
Acknowledged.
6. The proposed land uses and activities will be conducted so that noise generated shall not
exceed the minimum performance levels established herein. Detailed plans for the
elimination of objectionable noises may be required before the issuance of a building permit.
The land use proposed is single-family residential, which has minimal noise generation. The PAD
acknowledges the need to mitigate noise and light from adjacent commercial uses where
appropriate.
7. All developments will be connected to the public sewer system unless otherwise stipulated in
the PAD document.
Acknowledged.
9 149550.1
•
Comment/Response
8. The street and parking system provides for the smooth, safe, and convenient movement of
vehicles both on and of the site.
See Traffic Impact Analysis.
9. Each active recreational area is suitably located and accessible to the area it is intended to
serve, and adequate screening is provided to ensure privacy and quiet for neighboring uses.
We have provided 4 recreation areas, all interconnected by sidewalks or trails and located
throughout the development. They will be adequately screened.
10. The development is adjacent to an existing or approved public park or public open space
area, and provision has been made in the site plan to avoid interfering with public access to
that area.
The only public access area is Trail#328. We are providing and dedicating a 15-foot trail to
access#328 and improving the existing trail on site.
11. All signs in the project are in compliance with the provisions of Article 12-1.
All signs must comply with OVZCR.
12. Solar orientation and design concepts are incorporated in the PAD.
Yes. See answer to number 8 of Required Findings.
13. The PAD provides for safe pedestrian and bicycle access to schools and parks.
Yes. See answer to number 7 of Required Findings.
10 149550.1
UL,
A,v1k,„„„A,Nc-,
Revisions to Attachment 1
1. The Development Standards shall incorporate all the provisions of OVZCR
Chapters 10 and 15.
3. The TDP shall provide a cross access street to the property to the north. This
cross access street shall be in the form of a collector street that conforms to the
7. The 3 acre commercial property on the southwest corner of the property shall
Avenue will be approved.
11. The developer shall provide only those easements requested along the east side of
North First Avenueall easements required for the Town's First Avenue Improvements
Project as depicted on Attachment 11 at no cost to the Town of Oro Valley. All required
easements along the east side of North First Avenuefequifed have been circled in a heavy
black line on the three half size preliminary plans of Attachment 11.
12.
C. Section E. Grading shall be amended to state "OVZCR Chapters 10 and.
15 shall apply."
D. Section H(c):Preliminary Plat Conformance with Planned Area
Development (PAD) and Tentative Development Plan (TDP) shall be
amended as attached.
17. The following statement shall be included as General Note number 1 of the TDP
on Sheet One: "Compliance with some of the conditions of approval of
Ordinance (0)04 , 0V9 03 03, particularly related to grading, protection of
slopes of 25% or greater, circulation, and floodplain issues, may require
significant change to the TDP. Any significant change to the 1W-shall-be
subject to the review and recommendation of the Planning and Zoning
Commission and the review and approval of the Town Council, as described in
Section 3 104.C. and any other applicable provisions of OVZCR.
149663.1
+ M
H. Preliminary Plat Conformance with Planned Area Development (PAD) and Tentative
Development Plan (TDP):
The Tentative Development Plan (TDP) included as part of this Planned Area
Development (PAD) amendment for Area Z is intended to enhance the site
analysis data and provide greater detail about how the proposed single-family
residential community will be configured. It further serves to ensure that the
proposed community can be constructed in conformance with this PAD and the
codes and requirements of the Town of Oro Valley, where applicable. This PAD
amendment has been prepared with information from numerous local
homebuilder(s), but with no specific homebuilder(s) in mind. Therefore, it is
acknowledged that the preliminary plat submitted for this property may differ
from the TDP with regard to items such as the following: lot size, number of lots,
local street alignment, drainage and location of grading treatments.
Any proposed changes to the TDP to accommodate the residential design criteria
of a specific homebuilder shall be submitted to the Zoning Administrator, who
shall review the item, consult with the Public Words Department where
appropriate and shall ascertain whether or not the change is significant. If a
change is determined to be significant, revised plans shall be submitted for
reconsideration by both the Planning Commission and Town Council.
In determining if a proposed change is significant, the Zoning Administrator shall
use, but not be limited to, the following criteria: -- - . -:- - . :- :- ':- -:
circumstances:
a. The lot size and number of lots may vary from that shown on the
TDP provided that the lots conform to or exceed the minimum
development standards established by this PAD as they relate to lot size,
building heights, setbacks, and open space requirements, etc.
b. The drainage scheme shown on the TDP may vary provided it
complies with the Town of Oro Valley Floodplain Management Code and
Drainage Criteria Manual.
c. The treatment of graded slopes shown on the TDP may vary
provided they comply with the grading standards established herein and do
not exceed the grading limits on the TDP.-
d. The layout of local streets shown on the TDP may vary so that that
circulation still provides for logical and efficient movement of the vehicles
of community residents, police and fire departments and other emergency
services. Any changes to the circulation will be supported by a Traffic
Impact Analysis.
151623.1
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
OWN COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: January 21, 2004
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL
FROM: Susana Montana, Planner II
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE NO. (0) 04-04 ,OV11-03-01, MARK CASTRO,
REPRESENTING DC INVESTMENTS, SEEKS APPROVAL OF A GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT CHANGING THE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION OF AN 8.35 ACRE
PARCEL FROM "CP", COMMERCE PARK TO "MHDR", MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL, FOR THREE PARCELS LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER
OF DESERT SKY ROAD AND VALLE DEL ORO ROAD, PARCEL NUMBERS 224-33-
007A, 224-33-008A AND 224-33-011A.
PETITIONER'S REQUEST:
On behalf of D.C. Investments, Mark Castro of Tierra Right of Way Services requests an amendment to the
General Plan Land Use map designation for the three above-referenced parcels to change their designation from
Commerce Park ("CP") land use to Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) land use. Please see
kttachment 2 for a description of the Applicant's request. (Note: Both the 1996 General Plan and the proposed
2003 General Plan designate the area as CP.)
BACKGROUND:
The three parcels at the northwest corner of Desert Sky Road and Valle del Oro Road are in single ownership.
Two of the three parcels are undeveloped and one parcel was in residential use from the late 1950s to the late
1960s. The site and residential structure were converted to the corporate headquarters and storage yard of a land
development company (Horizon Land Corporation) in the late 1960s. Newmont Mining Corporation purchased
the property in 1973 and added to the existing structure and added storage structures. Some years ago,
Amphitheater School District ("Amphi") purchased the site and vacant building to convert it to a school bus
storage yard. Amphi abandoned that effort and the site and structure have been vacant since.
SUMMARY:
The site is zoned TP-Technology Park and is generally flat with about one-quarter of the land area developed
with a building (currently abandoned) and surface parking; The remaining land is covered by dense native
vegetation. The Applicant seeks a General Plan amendment to facilitate a rezoning of the property to allow
construction of 50 to 65 single-family detached homes on lots of 40 feet by 90 feet dimensions. The existing
structure would be demolished.
The MHDR land use designation would allow from 5 to 10 dwelling units per acre which would be allowed
vithin an R1-7 zoning district (allowing 6 units per acre) or an R-4 zoning district (allowing 8 units per acre).
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
TOWN COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 2 of 4
ANALYSIS:
Site Environs
The Site is included within the 1961 Horizon Heights subdivision as is designated therein as a commerce park
(zoned TP).
The Site is bounded by medium to high density residential uses ranging from 2 units per acre (2 RAC)to 6 RAC
and 12 RAC on three sides; the parcel abutting the site to the west is vacant and zoned R-4 (Townhouse
Residential) (see the table below and Attachment 1--Location Map).
Direction Subdivision No. Units Gen Plan Designation Zoning Units/Acre
(RAC)
North& Horizon 172 single MHDR(Medium High R-4 (Townhouse 2 RAC
West Heights family Density Residential) Residential)
attached
homes
East Pusch Ridge 176 units C (Commercial) R-6 (Multi-Family 12.4 RAC
Apartments Residential)
Southwest Sunstone 51 single MHDR R1-7 (Medium-Density 2.6 RAC
Estates family homes Single Family
Residential)
southeast Villa Balboa 109 single MHDR R-4 6 RAC
1 family homes
The Proposed Project
The Applicant seeks to designate the three parcels as MHDR on the General Plan Land Use Map to allow the
development of single-family detached homes at a density of 5.1 to 10 RAC. The Technological Park (TP)
zoning designation does not allow residential use. Therefore, the property would need both the General Plan
map amendment from CP to MHDR and then a rezoning from TP to a residential district that would allow that
density.
Neighborhood Concerns
As the site is surrounded by residential subdivisions, neighbors were very concerned with the traffic, noise and
other impacts of a potential school bus storage use for the site and they objected to that effort very strongly. The
Applicant held a neighborhood meeting on November 19, 2003 to reveal the proposal for a residential
subdivision. The neighbors who attended that meeting represented Homeowners Associations surrounding the
site and they supported the residential use of the site with the caveats that (1) they would only support single-
story homes and (2) if the homes were larger than 2 bedrooms, the developer should ensure that sufficient play
areas for both small and older children were provided within the subdivision such that the children would not
seek to play in neighboring subdivisions' common areas. The latter has been a problem in the area and the
affected Homeowners' Associations have had to repair damages to the common areas.
Each of the aforementioned issues would be more appropriately addressed during the rezoning phase of the
project, when a tentative development plan will be provided.
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
TOWN COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Page 3 of 4
Other Issues
Due to the industrial nature of previous property occupants, a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and
Limited Asbestos Survey was conducted for the site in 1996. The assessment found asbestos within the
building. Preliminary review of records for the site at the Pima County and Arizona Departments of
Environmental Quality(DEQ) do not reveal any history of complaints. During a rezoning phase of this Project,
staff would continue research to insure that proper clean-up measures are taken to remove any hazardous
materials on the property; those measures are expected to be incorporated into any future rezoning staff-
recommended conditions of approval.
GENERAL PLAN ANALYSIS:
Section 1.3 of the General Plan cites four findings that must be met when considering the granting of a General
Plan amendment; they are:
1. That the amendment constitutes an overall improvement to the general plan and is not solely for the
benefit of a particular land owner or owners at a particular point in time.
The proposed amendment would facilitate the elimination of an abandoned commercial/quasi-light industrial
use which is surrounded by medium to medium-high residential subdivisions. It would facilitate the conversion
of this commercial "island"use to a comparable-density residential subdivision.
2. That the amendment is consistent with the vision, goals, and policies of the general plan.
Ile amendment would strengthen the residential character of the surrounding neighborhood and would address
Goal 1.2 of the General Plan: "Promote a compatible mix of land uses throughout the Oro Valley Planning
Area."
3. That the general plan land use map does not provide appropriate optional sites for the use proposed in
the amendment.
There is only one other site designated for Medium High Residential Density within the Town and this parcel
was recently zoned for low-density residential development.
4. That the amendment will not adversely impact the community as a whole, or a portion of the community
without an acceptable means of mitigating these impacts through the subsequent zoning and
development processes.
The amendment will not adversely impact the community as a whole and any impacts associated with the
removal of the existing structure, and its asbestos, is expected to be properly mitigated by conditions placed on
the rezoning effort by staff, this Commission and the Town Council. In addition, due to the preponderance of
senior citizen households in the surrounding subdivisions, it is expected that extra care will be taken, again,
assured by conditions of approval placed on the rezoning action, to ameliorate any health hazards from fugitive
dust,pollen or mold associated with the removal of native vegetation and the grading of the site.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
On December 2, 2003, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted unanimously(6—0) to recommend approval
Df the General Plan Land Use Map amendment to Town Council.
TOWN COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
OF ORO VALLEY
Page 4 of 4
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Town Council approve the General Plan map amendment changing these three
parcels from Commerce Park (CP) to Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) because of the positive
effects of the amendment as described above and because the density proposed would be consistent with the
densities of the surrounding neighborhood.
SUGGESTED MOTIONS:
I move to approve Ordinance No. (0) 04-°,4OV11-03-01,Desert Sky General Plan Map Amendment.
OR
I move to approve Ordinance No. (0) 04�,`OV11-03-01, Desert Sky General Plan Map Amendment with the
following changes:
OR
I move to deny Ordinance No. (0) 04- 4 OV11-03-01, Desert Sky General Plan Map Amendment based on the
following findings:
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Ordinance (0) 04-04
2. Location Map
3. Application letter
Planni : . OZoni Admini trator
7S4-01
Co unity Developme I t Services
i / Director I
r1:-.• 4
Town anaeer
F:\OV\OV11\2003\OV11-03-O1\Reports\TC Report.doc
ORDINANCE NO. (0)04- 04
AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE LAND
USE MAP OF THE GENERAL PLAN BY CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF
THREE PARCELS, TOTALING 8.35 ACRES OF LAND, FROM "CP", COMMERCE PARK
TO "MHDR", MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, FOR PARCEL NUMBERS 224-
33-007A, 224-33-008A AND 224-33-011A LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
DESERT SKY ROAD AND VALLE DEL ORO ROAD.
WHEREAS, the three subject parcels are in single ownership and two of the parcels are undeveloped
and one parcel is occupied by an abandoned commercial building; and
WHEREAS, the three parcels are currently designated Commerce Park in the land use map of the
General Plan and are zoned TP--Technology Park; and
WHEREAS, the land surrounding the three parcels ("subject site") are developed in residential use and
are zoned for residential use; and
WHEREAS, the owner of the subject site wishes to demolish the abandoned commercial building and
build -
sin lefamil homes in a medium-high density subdivision on the subject site and cannot proceed
single-family
with a subdivisionp lat until and unless the site is first designated as MHDR--Medium High Density
Residential on the land use map of the General Plan, and second is rezoned to an appropriate R1-7 or R-
4 zoning district; and
WHEREAS, the MHDR would be a compatible land use within the neighborhood context and the
PlanningZoning and Commission, at a duly noticed public hearing on December 2, 2003, recommended
approval of the General Plan amendment to the Town Council;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY:
SECTION 1. The Council hereby adopts the General Plan land use map amendment, designating the
three subject parcels as MHDR on the land use map.
SECTION 2. The effective date of the General Plan land use map amendment shall be thirty days after
the adoption of this ordinance by the Town Council.
SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of the ordinance or any part
of the General Plan land use map amendment adopted herein is for any reason held to be invalid or
unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions thereof.
SECTION 4. That all ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be repealed to the extent
of such conflict.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona this 21st day
of January.
Paul H. Loomis, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathryn Cuvelier, Town Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Mark Langlitz, Town Attorney
ell1111111116""j
/ erra,
Right of Way Services
SEP 2 9 2003
Oro Valley Planning Staff
11000 N. La Canada Drive
Oro Valley, AZ 85737
Reference: Plan Amendment Narrative for Desert Sky Properties
Dear Staff:
The purpose of this request is to amend the portion of the General Plan that affects the
following three (3) parcels: 224-33-007A, 224-33-008A, and 224-33-011A. We are
proposing to amend the General Plan from CP (Commerce Park)to MHDR (Medium-
High Density Residential). This land use designation will support the use of single-family
detached development and, in addition, allow 5.1 to 10 dwelling units per acre.
The current zoning of these three parcels is TP (Technological Park). All three parcels
contribute to a site size of 8.35 acres. The parcel 224-33-007A is currently developed
and is used as a one-story commercial office space. The remaining two parcels are
undeveloped.
As requested per policy of the amendment proposal, we feel that the following findings
can be met:
1. The amendment, in its entirety, constitutes a benefit to the Town; and,
2. The amendment is substantially consistent with the vision, goals, and policies of
the General Plan; and,
3. The amendment proposes acceptable means for mitigating any adverse impact
on the community. :
Bydeveloping for detached single-family residential use, the proposed land use will have.
p 9 g Y
no severe impacts on the surrounding land uses. To the east of these parcels the
zoning is R-6 (Multi-family Residential). The zoning north and west of these parcels:is •
zoned as R-4 (Townhouse Residential) and to the south there are two zoning
designators R-4 and R1-7 (Single-family Residential). This is a benefit to the comt _�uinity -.:
in that it is following the development patterns for the Town of Oro Valley and wilt not ::
have any negative impacts to the surrounding uses since they are all currently
residential.
The vision for the Town of Oro Valley emphasizes the importance of having an improved
community philosophy and a unique image for the future. The following are goals and
how they are met through this proposed land use. The first goal stated in the plan
encourages the preservation of the Sonoran Desert environment and scenic resources.
The amendment will comply with Chapter 7 of the Town of Oro Valley Zoning Code,
Randye K. Rabb, President, Broker
1575 East River Road, Suite 201 • Tucson, AZ 85718 • (520) 319-2106 • Fax: (520) 323-3326
Land Acquisition & Relocation Assistance • Archaeological & Environmental.
Survey & Mapping • Real Estate & Asset Management • Program & Construction Management
• ,...
pra,
Right of Way Services
specifically Section 7-504-B.1 —6 in reference to open space requirements. Property
Development Standards requires that thirty-five percent (35%)of net lot area will be
designated as open space in order to protect environmentally sensitive areas. This is
vital to the preservation of Oro Valley's natural Sonoran Desert environment and scenic
resources.
The second goal encourages the compatible mix of land uses. The proposed site
location for residential development will be located near activity centers and an arterial
road, thus reducing travel times. The location of higher density land uses, such as this
development, needs to be near a major transportation corridor as stated in the policy
described by the General Plan. This site is located just west of Oracle Road, which
would support this policy. This will promote compatible land uses throughout the Oro
Valley Planning Area.
The third goal encourages joint land use planning and the shared use of facilities. The
proposed residential development encourages more joint planning and strengthens an
already existing relationship between the Town and Amphitheater Public School district.
This supports the policies that are described under this goal.
The fourth goal states that there will be no financial burden emplaced on those existing
residents surrounding this site. By developing this site as residential, this will attract
more residents and therefore will have no negative impacts on property values.
The proposed amendment does not impose any adverse impacts on the community.The
proposed land use will blend in with the surrounding land uses. The increased density of
the land use and the location of the site will accommodate the goals as described in the
Land Use Element of the plan.
In conclusion, based on the findings for the plan amendment, there is evidence that this
amendment will benefit the Town, remain consistent with the vision, goals, and policies
of the plan, and will provide acceptable means for mitigating any adverse impacts on the j-
community. The requested amendment of the General Plan supports Oro Valley's vision` :"T:
for the future by protecting the integrity of the environment through high-density
residential development and strengthening an already existing infrastructure by well
planned and appropriate land uses. �'
We hope that these findings will be sufficient in determining a decision for the plait
amendment. If you require further information please contact me at (520) 319-2106
Sincerely,
itkai
Mark Castro, Planner
Tierra Right of Way Services, Ltd.
Randye K. Rabb, President, Broker
1575 East River Road, Suite 201 • Tucson, AZ 85718 • (520) 319-2106 • Fax: (520) 323-3326
Land Acquisition & Relocation Assistance • Archaeological & Environmental
Survey & Mapping • Real Estate & Asset Management • Program & Construction Management
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
STAFF REPORT TO THE TOWN COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 21, 2004
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR& COUNCIL
FROM: Robert Conant, Planner II
SUBJECT: OV12-03-12, SWAIM ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, REPRESENTING THE CHURCH
OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS, REQUESTS APPROVAL OF A
DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A 16,000 SQUARE FOOT CHURCH,
LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ARROWSMITH DRIVE AND
WOODBURNE AVENUE, PARCEL 219-530-04E
BACKGROUND:
Swaim Associates, representing the Church of Jesus Christ Latter-Day Saints, requests Town Council approval
of a Development Plan for a church facility. The project is located in Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 7, on the
southeast corner of Arrowsmith Drive and Woodburne Avenue.
SUMMARY:
TheJro'ect is located on a 4.47 acre site with existing zoning of PAD and Rancho Vistoso land use designation
p
)f Medium High DensityResidential. Under the Rancho Vistoso PAD, churches are a permitted use in this land
g
use classification.
The church building is 16,000 square feet, containing the sanctuary, multi-purpose room, classrooms and office
space.
Open Space:
The PAD requires that 10% of the gross area be open space. The church provides 44%.
Building Height:
The maximum building height permitted by the Rancho Vistoso PAD is thirty (30') feet and two stories. The
maximum height of the proposed church is thirty (30') feet at the ridge pole (top of gable) of the nave. The
building is in compliance with the PAD.
Setbacks:
Thep lan is in conformance with the requirements of the Rancho Vistoso PAD. The following setbacks are
required and have been met or exceeded:
Front: 20 feet
Side: 5 feet
Rear: 5 feet
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
i OWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Page 2
Parking:
The OVZCR gives the DRB the authority to approve alternative compliance with the Parking Code.
The applicant requested alternative compliance for parking per Section 27.C.2 of the Zoning Code. The
OVZCR requires that 141 spaces be provided. Based on the information provided by the applicant and staffs
analysis of the request, the DRB approved 156 spaces for the site.
Traffic and Circulation:
Access to the church will be from Woodburne Avenue and Arrowsmith Drive. The area highway network has
been designed and constructed to incorporate the traffic generated from this development.
Grading:
A Type 2 Grading Permit will be required to construct the building pad, drainage structures, utilities,parking lot
and any walls necessary for grading on the development site.
Drainage:
The existing on-site drainage patterns (north to south) will be maintained. Onsite drainage will be conveyed by
a combination of constructed water harvesting areas and inverted crown PAALs. Detention basins and water
harvesting areas are provided to limit the post developed flows to the pre-developed rate. A stormwater
treatment system will be utilized at the two runoff concentration points to treat first flush for the site.
Design Guidelines:
The following Design Guidelines apply to this Development Plan:
Section 16-103(2)(a)Design projects to preserve washes and substantial vegetation stands:
The Development Plan preserves the wash and riparian area to the east of the site. No development will occur
in this area.
Section 16-103(5)(c) Site design should be sensitive to adjacent land uses.
The Development Plan and the design of the church building has been sensitive to the adjacent land uses by
keeping the building profile in harmony with the surrounding residential uses.
To the north of the church site the houses have a finished floor elevation of approximately five feet above
Arrowsmith Drive, and have a six foot masonry sound wall at the same elevation as the finished floor of the
Houses. These houses have no view from the first story. The second story will look across the top of the church
building; the two story houses have a height of at least 24-feet. The distance of the church building from the
face of the wall is approximately 100-feet. To the west the houses are level with the church site, and a six foot
masonry sound wall has been constructed along Woodburne Avenue. These houses also only have views from
the second story. The permitted height is 30-feet and two stories. The church, however, is placed so that the
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Page 3
side face is approximately 260-feet from the face of the wall and does not block views from the second story.
To the east a riparian area blocks the church from the houses.
Neighborhood Meeting:
A neighborhood meeting was held on August 14, 2003, with approximately 60 residents in attendance. The
major concern of the neighbors were; over flow parking, traffic circulation and hours of use.
The parking issue has been discussed above and traffic circulation, as shown on the Development Plan, is in
compliance with the Town of Oro Valley Subdivision Street Standards for driveways.
GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE:
The Development Plan is in compliance with the General Plan by promoting the following Policies:
Policy 9.1, "to ensure that the built environment is aesthetically pleasing and compatible with the natural
surroundings", and
Policy 9.1H, "mitigate negative visual impacts of buildings and parking lots, add aesthetic charm, interest and
haracter."
The Development Plan has been designed so the church building and the parking areas do not detract from the
natural or built environment surrounding the site.
DRB ACTION:
On December 9, 2003 the DRB voted unanimously(5-0) to recommend approval of the Development Plan. The
DRB, however, had the following concerns:
• About overflow parking and suggested that the church investigate the possibility of an agreement with
the Hansen Family Trust office building at corner of Arrowsmith Drive and Rancho Vistoso Blvd to
provide for overflow parking when needed.
• The DRB was also concerned about pedestrian safety and suggested that a possible sidewalk be placed
at the entrance to the park. The Department of Public Works analyzed the traffic flow on Woodburne
Avenue and found that a sidewalk was not warranted.
• DRB further was concerned about the height of the building. The site will be lowered by three feet from
the existing grade,which will reduce the overall effect of the building height on the neighbors.
Attached are the Draft DRB minutes relative to this project.
RECOMMENDATION:
it is recommended that the Town Council approve the Development Plan for the Church of Jesus Christ Latter-
Day Saints.
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
1,OWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Pace 4
SUGGESTED MOTIONS:
The Town Council may wish to consider one of the following suggested motions:
I move to approve OV 12-03-12, Development Plan for the Church of Jesus Christ Latter-Day Saints.
OR
I move to approve OV 12-03-12, Development Plan for the Church of Jesus Christ Latter-Day Saints, subject to
the following condition(s):
OR
I move to deny OV1.2-03-12, Development Plan for the Church of Jesus Christ Latter-Day Saints, finding
that:
Attachments:
1. Development Plan
2. Draft DRB Minutes °
\}/4-‘r
Plannint.a d Z.l.r: Administrator
I
C• •ity I eve O. ent Director
•
Town Manager
Contact:
Swaim Associates
Mark Bollard
Fax 326-1148
MINUTES OF THE
ORO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 9, 2003
ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE
REGULAR MEETING
CALL TO ORDER: 6:05 p.m. DRAFT
PRESENT:
Jim Vogelsberg, Chair
Mary Caswell, Vice Chair
Clark Reddin,Member
Richard Feinberg, Member
Al Kunisch,Member
ALSO PRESENT:
Bayer Vella, Senior Planner
Joe Andrews, Civil Attorney
Craig Civalier, Development Review Division Manager
Kristina Curry, Secretary II
ABSENT:
Jeff Weatherford,Member Excused
Conny Culver, Member Excused
REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF NOVEMBER 12, 2003 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
BOARD MINUTES
Kristina Curry, Recording Secretary, read into the record a requested amendment by Member
Culver. In addition, Bayer Vella made known Member Culver's request that the vote on OV 12-03-
07, Preliminary Plat for TJ Bednar Homes,reflect her opposition.
MOTION: Vice Chair Caswell moved to amend the minutes as requested.
Chairman Vogelsberg seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-0.
12/9/2003 Development Review Board Minutes Page 2
REGULAR AGENDA
1. OV13-03-40A, RANDAL JACOB DESIGN GROUP, REPRESENTING
SOUTHERN ARIZONA GLASSWORKS, REQUESTS ARCHITECTURAL
APPROVAL OF A PROPOSED RETAIL AND OFFICE FACILITY LOCATED
WITHIN THE FOOTHILLS BUSINESS PARK - NEAR THE NORTHEAST
INTERSECTION OF ORACLE ROAD AND EAST HENLY BLVD, PARCEL
NOS.22010016A& 22010017A.
Bayer Vella introduced the staff report into the record. Staff recommended approval of the
proposed color scheme.
Randal Jacob of the Randal Jacob Design Group addressed the Board and made himself available
for questioning.
Member Feinberg thanked the applicant for complying with the Board's and citizens' wishes by
proposing earth tones for the color scheme.
Chairman Vogelsberg opened the meeting to public comment for Agenda Item 1. As there were
no speakers, he closed the meeting to public comment for Agenda Item 1.
MOTION: Member Kunisch moved to approve the color scheme proposed— as
part of OV 13-03-40A — for the Southern Arizona Glassworks
architecture review. Member Reddin seconded the motion. Motion
carried 5-0.
2. OV12-03-12, SWAIM ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS REPRESENTING THE
CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST LATTER-DAY SAINTS, REQUESTS APPROVAL
OF A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A 16,000 SQUARE FOOT
CHURCH, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ARROWSMITH
DRIVE AND WOODBURNE AVENUE, PARCEL 219-530-04E
Bayer Vella introduced the staff report into the record. Staff recommended that the DRB
recommend Town Council approval of the Development Plan for the Church of Jesus Christ
Latter-Day Saints, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit A.
Staff Conditions:
1. Bicycle parking shall be shown on the Development Plan prior to Town Council review.
F:\Minutes\DRB\2003\12-9-03 draft minutes.doc Draft minutes to be approved
2
12/9/2003 Development Review Board Minutes Page 3
2. Delete the distances 679.70® and 679.22(M) from the.line bearing N56°53'00' on the site
map and the Development Plan.
3. Add correct angle delta for the curve data along Woodburne Avenue on the site map.
4. Delete the extra line of curve data shown at the northwest corner on the site plan.
5. Provide ap edestrian easement for all sidewalks outside of the Right-of-Way along
Arrowsmith Drive.
6. A license agreement with the Town of Oro Valley is required to maintain the sidewalk
and landscaping within the Arrowsmith Right-of-Way. The license agreement shall be
obtained at the time of the Grading Permit.
7. Label all proposed contours.
8. All PAAL cross slopes shall not exceed 4%.
9. Ensure all slopes around the detention basin do not exceed 4:1 (H:V) or provide security
barriers.
10. Label the detention basin exit velocity on detail 10/2.
11. Complete the walkway and elevations around the walkway within the retained area south
of the south parking lot.
12. Revise elevations around and across the sidewalk to provide a sidewalk maximum cross
slope of 2% in the area southeast of the southeast section of retaining wall.
13. Revise the Limits of Grading on the southeast side of the site to include all areas of
grading (sidewalk construction).
14. The cross slope analysis calculations submitted for this project must be sealed and signed
by the registered professional engineer of record for the project.
Member Kunisch questioned if Woodburne Avenue has four lanes of traffic, which taper down to
two lanes,which was answered affirmatively by staff.
Chairman Vogelsberg inquired if the flow elevation of the church would remain at the existing
ground level. Bayer Vella responded that it would be lower by approximately 3 feet,which would in
turn cause the roofline to be lower. In addition, Chairman Vogelsberg asked if there was a lease
agreement for overflow parking between the church and the Hansen Foundation. Mr. Vella replied
that he was not aware of any such agreement.
Member Feinberg asked staff their view on crosswalk safety. Craig Civalier responded that
crosswalks may provide a false sense of security and advised against putting one in unless
warranted. He recommended conducting a traffic study,to be paid for by the church. Member
F:\Minutes\DRB\2003\12-9-03 draft minutes.doc Draft minutes to be approved
3
12/9/2003 Development Review Board Minutes Page 4
Feinberg observed that it would be difficult to perform the study before the church was built. Mr.
Civalier agreed, but added that it could be done if it was known how many in the congregation
would walk to church.
Vice Chair Caswell voiced concern over traffic safety issues as they relate to the church and the
park. She reported that traffic often exceeds the posted speed limit of 25 mph, and added that there
is a blind corner near the park. To protect children who may run into the street, she requested that
some measures be taken to slow the flow of traffic along Woodburne Avenue. Craig Civalier
responded that, as Woodburne Avenue is a collector street, speed bumps could not be added. He
also noted that a crosswalk near a blind corner would pose a danger. He stated that a mid-block
crosswalk may provide a solution, and committed to conducting a traffic study.
Member Kunisch asked if parking on the street along Woodburne Avenue and Arrowsmith Drive
could be restricted. Bayer Vella reported that parking in that area was already restricted by the
HOA. He voiced that, as the church exceeded their parking requirements, overflow parking would
not likely become an issue.
Mark Baller, representing the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, addressed the Board.
He emphasized that the building was placed on the site in such a way as to minimize impact on
neighboring homes. He noted that parking is indeed prohibited on the streets in that area, which
is why extra spaces were added to the parking lot design.
Vice Chair Caswell requested that the General Notes on the Development Plan be amended, as
the Sun City Vistoso design guidelines are not applicable to Rancho Vistoso.
Chairman Vogelsberg inquired if the church has an overflow parking agreement with the offices
to the north-east, which was answered negatively. Additionally, he questioned how many in the
congregation would walk to church. Mr. Baller responded that only a handful would likely walk,
and all others would drive. He added that church services would be divided into two separate
times, with approximately 250 members attending at any one time. Member Feinberg expressed
concern about increased parking needs if the church were to expand.
Vice Chair Caswell questioned where workers would park during the construction phase. It was
answered that a parking area would be designated on site for contractor vehicles.
Chairman Vogelsberg opened the meeting to public comment for Agenda Item 2. Bill Adler,
10720 N. Eagle Eye Place in Oro Valley, suggested adding a condition whereby police officers
assist with traffic control during the first month of services. Chairman Vogelsberg closed the
meeting to public comment for Agenda Item 2.
MOTION: Member Kunisch moved to recommend that the Town Council
approve OV l 2-03-12, Development Plan for the Church of Jesus
Christ Latter-Day Saints, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit
A. Member Reddin seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-0.
F:\Minutes\DRB\2003\12-9-03 draft minutes.doc Draft minutes to be approved
4
12/9/2003 Development Review Board Minutes Page 5
3. OV12-03-12A, SWAIM ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS REPRESENTING THE
CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST LATTER-DAY SAINTS, REQUESTS APPROVAL
OF THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR A 16,000 SQUARE FOOT CHURCH,
LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ARROWSMITH DRIVE AND
WOODBURNE AVENUE, PARCEL 219-530-04E
Bayer Vella introduced the staff report into the record. Staff recommended that the DRB approve
the Church of Jesus Christ Latter-Day Saints, Landscape Plan.
Chairman Vogelsberg inquired if the irrigation system could be retrofitted to utilize reclaimed
water, once it becomes available. It was answered affirmatively.
Chairman Vogelsberg opened the meeting to public comment for Agenda Item 3. As there were
no speakers, he closed the meeting to public comment for Agenda Item 3.
MOTION: Vice Chair Caswell moved to approve OV12-03-12A, Landscape
Plan for the Church of Jesus Christ Latter-Day Saints. Member
Reddin seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-0.
4. OV13-03-34, SWAIM ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS REPRESENTING THE
CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST LATTER-DAY SAINTS, REQUESTS
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW FOR A 16,000 SQUARE FOOT CHURCH
LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ARROWSMITH DRIVE AND
WOODBURNE AVENUE,PARCEL 219-530-04E
Bayer Vella introduced the staff report into the record. Staff recommended that the DRB approve
the architecture for the Church Jesus Christ of Latter—Day Saints.
Member Feinberg observed the massive roofline of the structure. He inquired if it could be
broken up visually. The applicant answered that the original plan had been altered to separate the
roofline and flatten its pitch, thus breaking up the expansive tiling. He explained that it could not
be altered more significantly, as the congregation's meeting rooms were housed below.
Vice Chair Caswell inquired if the applicant would consider using a lighter color of tile than the
terra cotta. The applicant responded that the tile would not actually be a terra cotta color, but
rather a multi color chocolate brown, per the Rancho Vistoso HOA's request. He added that he
would be happy to look at lighter tones.
Chairman Vogelsberg opened the meeting to public comment for Agenda Item 4. As there were
no speakers, he closed the meeting to public comment for Agenda Item 4.
MOTION: Member Reddin moved to approve OV 13-03-34, Church of Jesus
Christ of Latter-Day Saints architecture. Member Kunisch
seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-0.
F:\Minutes\DRB\2003\12-9-03 draft minutes.doc Draft minutes to be approved
5
nl N O os U1 i• W F,1 p
(o cb v rn U �. w r�
(n�D-I-i can (>,vl� ir7o
-' IMM
ng'1(' r+��yom o`Ooor*�2 nKOD m OD�'� � �� `�_ m�� Thi 01,-1
!iniil
n +�O �3Ilc� -izrtn� � tD �mcnn� a '~mom-. Nc 2D Zy0 'iDmt'I*1 �m �mp0ItOmm rn0 ����2 Wx COQ Airegn �mx_ 2� 0000 ?Z 5. v� v,mem � I� n m cn� �- -r � zm x� o 0 oz ry o <_crVic- u' WO
� o 0o c2Om��o � ''�cn �o ao� o Zyp2 �m mo g ca � oma" oma- Cc � mw oZ
r , o :qo: DzrWWnc��aoIM �� 1 cn 11 p mmm III H� o c W
Zz4'.'
D 1ni �n,m �rm� oxoy , r mxcln ,+ op � om ,��� oobo000 � o � � �o �v,',m-2mn� !IIN o<:8g '' m -i'r �-0`Zj °a-Iv 2l 2 z 'fir °°oohWrn� F,(33;' :,12
��'�:O � er n� � oaOZc o p -oolo
r� D vim mN0 m 2D r0- D � 0 -< O r O�lm � D an(n � 2 r (\ � r z-1 2 -1
°Zero D�m� �° � �~ nDO� DI(n °'• � _ � Ong pt+�2 ��� nn'�1c.ta►� "'� m COQ •�� Cm Zm -t0 ��� T4ir
z�'z m m?'"''-'
2 D Z Q '047 DD (-Am5m.
cn ,00 a 2
�o Z�g �m�O ?n-z+ p � !i !
r�(n D(nr � n ap zm� fin.. n00m2 Zp n Vlrmt_7 WrTi
On, m r p9, gRX V1W- r°m 0��T 2 �0 g n y`� � O m ` � _ (�vl�0 Wer! 0`zrm'1'T+ on ri ; 'a'� fn cn l',
v�'a�011 m2 no4g p� v O() I- r� z m.,� �zl�
�(�r?m2 �-zr� � � p Z <� tn0 '� O-prom �° WI-9'
-z O OppO''1'T1 -
O m Ocm„m -Zi mn-<o ,, �-+mvn,l §m O (n O, z , n vmi �� m p "1`"Zrm2 p n i ymZzDN �Otr1 G, 00DgO� r� u, C �lD< nn, till (mil C �� m y O n -, mom_ thi°1§% m pA$1, o !n 'l0')% v,1 P m I ' Zm rr, o�. r„16„1_'vl zy m _ x o b
pO�zC �y m0=' p Z� r N '•C� � � �m OZ (� m 3. pp a z ^002 � �r cn C1o�
ry,O n '� cp '� f�* rxr, D (mrl" O �CZ�m D G) Da �(n
,0,7, �' o O2 ct m cg,pam (nA �a o o �? r5-o� aT �o,,ca . o-g� ^'Q N g
U7 �1(n -' -I m� p ZD i-pm = �(� �O
06, q-- ryy'O -i c, D (.)2i 2'� Alis T5, r_ Om a0 (6p O n 2 laemTy O im--) 'mrO(C OTs')Dm S('�� -' 0ti ODS -1-Im� OinZ (� < I- r_Zmt=� O� opt �� (nt`2?,,,,(T, o m mowDi am�m`Z- DTnc -I -� cnT < mm ! m oo ?' t+�mo m o P :
DC C � g n < �� OZ <C2 (n � Z cnZ r<-r�� O � O
O r � � r C mD (��� � D�, O m0 � � r.,(nm-p m m
D 2 Cts A--r T o DCpO�' mx r,, VI rm r oD x7 O C (nn
2'� o �C On�m 2 k Ommc Zpm (n--ov`1 m rW 0 N Dn�H1 m r0 _ c °O° z k,r6 op
m -i N b �(n O -I 2 00� m
106).
n m(� p T n D 2 cn m -C (n m �''p(n N
m(n D � Z Ow a (-,a1--„„T, � p I m
;','j.:,1 *,°; -ca� cngoDD Re9� oz v'1 62 �y (ng,,Ilj2 o z PJ4,1 NW
��' "lm �c ma�z�zn a° z� ulon Oo �oy r�c7r(�D (mil „ mXA
c�� p,3_-,0, rrr ti z,c�^e0 `2T r (n (4] a 13 �my'�la a ~ c`l�('il '' " mnDz- m 0oD r°� o °-+ m cn pyo�� Do� �-+ oEic,, pi ngs OCZ i cc z° x vxgoy T m8nm v, m
Z O_ S ,, ,, r Zy m 2 nn rr,FI zmzzo �' m0�� mm
Z m 00 O R �P- y !�� p
P- O
PE p niS 00'01' 1:,!1
2638.81' r(7rr0-Of� wn,w
v'(7 �1 m,D f° �1 ` O N(N N
iI!i!
—ID Oho_ (n=cz rZ :37MITI �T, '~`tilK O9p ( �� ��2o< / � lc ��O�D �np- OCO � ) O 2 `II C�(n(n(7D m m �Om�ppm�mn mn,� ZmO /� f!) �_"� 2Zzn2m-00 c; rc2z�i-z,� oTm zcn o w� n -: oo�� Z -aD tmParsio i 0 v m-o0
Mg,da
" _m0� mW, G7 G)� �/pl v � �^!Cb`+!/ � �mm macr,,,'
r �,Z fQJV01 NAAOz �mO`'ao 01 Nm 02 m m Z O D O to O(r -�'
W5.:,,1082
7 N _-' D n m D
O II m� m y V O 08 2 z Z cn Z g
'2'=m HI
�o'mcnoD /nl �`,LoyQ �i '/ � -1:8 oA?moE 2 . ° a oz�°"1� m coot / Cw '�� = TO �z-' T,m o <
W ~x 8= / \�9 q o� / 'T.,2�Oy��rr-2 r '` C p mi n
d (1.1 r oo \O,y wp-n tNv- c(8--i Z n ° ��-,
' LI
D / -0 �c71. ���_� ~-z 20 0 moo°Z� = m / 1- s !iiI :iu : 1
2mp D / mOO r / // ....\e `\\ ,0�9 'icZi1tail"� / ; \ \ 4�'C� 'r'e,
a
r. 0 0 ly 3N�n9 \ N. ' \\\ `-O.0,d, In ° n Ol o W o o 0 0
�- Ns e \ �/ m n O O p D
\ o m-
,'W
aT�l�=-azn�m_�a:: ��z co-i�Do ' * A''''‘'''„ L \c'-p \ ',"'8, g,1' 'fi 'cc'-3'T ""
\J `\\\\ \%�a ..,„ \\ 0
Ory io n 1p_ ulo'iDm ma ,_D�lm � 0 cnCoo-i� `:�; / tai D“i"!!WiN,"MPU
ym T<�r(nOnnnZD2 vC�O� i \ /,r'1 ti, /i 1 \ \ O D� Z
zocn0 o(n z r. . . - \ / e \ �z o 0n<+Dom8 o' ,.rt. \ ,* �•'� �� \ Do m m��TI ZDrp \ /\\ � `� ;�•�� �R�` \ N \ 2 , oZ�Om r Ttn(Antnz� O N��W \ ,z'i .. V.'6, \ G 2 (�i'
i!”
~m mzcn omzz2pp-'mP (r) i// ,,&,\:_,0---7-A'. >_�``� ®� ffp���rtir��',\\PI,
'''41('',1 ' 4r-,il Dc.O \\ " X�2 \OOZmm�-'xmxl� r/1 (o \,�•• /�� �i>, ,st-jrp.
v' \T, cn f 2 I�c�ZT_T,Om -ID \.. `�\ 1 t: q \mcno m \. .. 9 /in <�OnZZ2mOOcnr2 G7 1 r• ` a *si \
Vg"2 PI a8244HIP E, ,4 i't.,.—',.._ - ,,c—'7-1A\ N„,,
4.
r;15Lc-i° k; 7fl V40 N (z)°,(i St,,:
"Or18 h
OOT �m H
aN I,T1
OW , ',Y \\�` �i I `e_ ,/b A l"Orm �I~ (n n0 Zm ym T \:�` k,\' l�,,, / \\ r,,- O�
2 Z-x' 2 O ry Z c1 O rxl, 4'w :: v -\a ..c\ ,. \� !°
cpm 1C O. rZ*1Z Zm m 00 , .\ \ �.\\ �'oO'
4 '
\ ,.,
G7 m O � 3::x O
Z go, / v,-, Q
A
- £,,0.60 -
-
--
\cn;4 IM‘ Z£33z0'£.6
0'gZ'0££ . m
\am
\S00-44'49"E 264.94'04 r3 NS00.40'00"E 265.00'(R) no
4` y WW0°
•
'0'J {n1
P Heplryee O•� �^ V
a C o i J512--
J� DO
\ I
•-i'
=7 $�222_' _� �. .�. / ' /-'
>S N-g i Z Z w� \\
'\
o
II
m Z z o z m 0 LJN\N�Nd� �pN°o
r?I D H n Z SD 1S\f\0\n,L O �,I
Nm con IT7 g,„_~0 m
o1d\d0 m
� o�moz � •�� -i�� So 44
r?.'-'2',Ivm O a'cm � p 1 4 mo s
Et
o� 9
q;51711
� ^'iN `�' A'� 2 0 0 A kk k k k k k k k kk k Ir o a6 00' zoo° nHmv o [~,6 0 o o cncn cn n cn.�cn cn n(n v'S!m a •°1 N 'a�mC") p�� O vSi� I v'iwo 0 o 0,,,n���c2icz HIP, aiW'mllm Zp= T1 O ppO�oOO �mo'cnisWN� I /� �►ldr� i p e'-'11
om! m0 El -' 'mo' Z tom r moo SiVp`O ,n =oPV'.� 4le 1,1 1 g
rT3' Opt 2= (n l 1 gI I<"v' c� nn Orr,-q = -Zlnmm �y E- . Hg
�'' �'x n �(n O O p A A D �� =D��y�I. O ,.. Cxs :109
,,,n a,, c�m my ^,� n o �r-^� El
�- r=�jm D�. c� ��, m �l __. ��,
-T1 r c� > o ��c�2 M�� 2 2 Z O(n Vl i?1 n I m 1 2 i Z �O c�=v o`�o 0110 'yA -- - m x o 5
o Oc'n i c)! RA
2Z°p 2"'71r5.AA E-I G,)- (n;m _ _ gc uvox Q�p°.p �,__ so`�a WP,y �, o02 ''-+o mZ 2C C - xI"� w �1rn roti �jf��oo i_i L• ��vw��b � O O �7� � lmm O13 (''''`i:o
ppD f�i n�- $O,�� I .• ow� '' 1 1 m {''"' ZZz' r1 i— ` m2O-' �_ `�'•d_o � ryz� ;Z � a_ ,,cy�rA2T I� IxNm `t�0-.. • I I`�r ; -- ' - a
h
; Z Im �� o�c � iso iL}/ ' �
1 v�C �, I tea
,Q
�n r gq
i I 1 I y rD 2N('IO iW ` ✓l r. l` Ph 1
off' _ N 1' w C22 i. ^� `<.'l�► a
2 1a --.11.4T ro z
/ O � r.1, Q��P O OO Amy iN �nE�:; � Y o
` Fi x :°
m o z - i' O o '� g < ®®o o dao ti, _E ..AR.22 �5
r N O N V1�s Soo 8zo� �oOo ti° oy
O n n n tie �o %.8 t-u 2 k°
w =o I I I I �� J� �� ��a
'0 m z o if D n n Po
pp�� o A v,6
p''' ��O '�lJ D o rn9 b x
m -I pia m o o O -i n p D DZ =2 o z @ iiit(SIiii _O
w i'-,r,
'-1?7 /�M ii m m Vm O n O_ gO ��ORImr q 0wJ g �' O m N `m (7] N m8'8* =ma �. y m 0 -rn,ri m m o p ,, r 8 3oop� C7
.� w r �_ � � S N Z
n � � p m•wwZm m� m> H21' rt O j 0 0 �'rnrnDr (n o�T z Z 7 a d. ".' tid 0 O l e V o D_-i i
cn m Vas
O 41 N
2 3 mon7N D 0
6' 18-
g� '" !�
r
noni,Zao l r —Orri 7 1/2" 1/2- _ 3/8' 1/2-
� ''',2.-
2��o���N o',,,,, V) /_y�, t 1-Max 1%2- .�/8" 1/ 2" 2- 1- ,_,_,_ 6 §
oc a a^1 U ((I��-,
PO(^p,2%—pm a � y 3/8- ~,k.
n 0
o n°� oq 1 I
i
iti � = �a� =oma -D � �1 � ILi
�`C (mZ >rn W
n Q, CD m -G-v n % �,
(L) L'''Irc'(;3,(!iirl';10 r-T-1--- I I' _...7.— %.rTili' > ,i'-,-
_ _1.- -.2-. 2 -,---- ,,(i)
1: ,;,
i''=k;=4
a ��Oti��w c� �" ti cp n� m 1�. Z = Z�� \ Z o (c ;\ ~ ~
ce �
m cr� i '',''',T, ° „ o = o
H Z6, a -� a LLL r
z
§: �N `'cj
R
Pipe diameter IIIIIMID o
A
it/ I i 1,,,, � s
c Pipe diameter ,,,
Wa// 1 I {-W—o/—/ r c'1.
. ' '1
4D !i- A - sipI
= nz n2 ��% m•�.� 1 II :ri Ti
1 m,0. v, x
x-, Al
.Z ill D %� ��a a� 11 � � c�
o _4� < r +
�n 1 �Mp
Wit i, “11. 11: i f. / I 1 a2
11= rs. cn a°y� (f 1 ,? _ ��ice° :.l r 1 1. C7°n �; m ► `� rr 1 0
s_ni ,i,(,, ,,,, ,4,,,,,,:.-,,,„ 411 :5 1-:::,,;) 1 •---°'
Z g-�� C /h �,. 51 I o o '`-�2.f 1 rO 11 �.Iw+�
1Mi
�^ may, J 1. y / 1 41116-rj't
I
UIrg r v
. r D a D �' =111111 :: .
_ N rn � � .1 i, ,, �° III-=lil:���.'.,,,_.t``, o
o z m f
ro � �, Z �. 00000000000000000 ••n
Q 0000o00.a. ,000000• 37 _111111=1i1:=:'.; n� S
ro T •00000000000.000o0. J
� z
ov, ,00O0000O000O000000 ` I `�III'II
o
= �! x- ,� oro ??z, as
.„00oo0o000000000000• - ��
,o i i 111-111111=11
2, 94 _111111-111111 Tari R
A � Nr:�v
� � C? a A0-,','
u
ca _F Ili=111111=L
%) V %
111111= 11��I=
C 111111=111111=
r,',', r„,--)A , ,V,4
pl. c ,,, %. ,,,,,.
P 11 ,., N4 r, r,,_:),
iu j� ii I 12'-0'
0
CO .16
al. „.„
41D ear
,.,
-:
'p III II.�Iri ij
p 0 3 O \
› II .. x \Ri`g rl N z I
D III .. , �� 1,\ _,:s_._0
\ /�
N ,
,_ 2 z to ;12 ea N z
o \!,'-%
( "m o Cn n� \ I X 1
m m ',z �� / (,\
--R--. , .9
— r,,,,,%,-
aaL_______ b.,___,
- it�f cf'? O 9 ,,,,, �,� Im �� I ,/ , \ 1D Do
-z _
r
O a ,a I*
H r'1
,c '4!4-0.-',11
,, .
oia� `' p \ B"TYP
M `').II'0 i
N� fl
� Z ,, /1 ti, 0 y
m ozonm ^ �2 LKJ/
Z 2 * m
'w0,o ,. como • • - i
m�2-n m azo 2.Z vc'
Fvim Tf ?n;y C 41r1g .l• , s+ Op O)
,oc.,� w .nand„ m C tim 'J 4 oo 4,1% \w
0,,, 0 &I-'� -' W \�r.)'/".. ^1 '% ice O 6 VI; 00
-,z O O�7 T
m a m °A Lk • ^ 01 C ~n 0O.^1®� Cm
a w m y Z �to,� 0 ti "'P''1 c'
r'',"
n -OOM^ s n� X02 O
o r =, -(t.',1 n 3- n''On
m n Q 0 r°� 'K —I CLEAR �O
< '--•, cn a m m t,
I
FA
I
��a � Cn
vi v N n ig 0 �1 '73z ��`0 00
•` L kti1t »» ��1��.» »1 ��iK
m P
._-
O J m D
m -.//‘‘ D'M/N LAP
C 2�m ca 1N
--1
zD I���;'
i— ' 1.e,,5):.1
R')
wI 's =F * 'kms r CONC.SLAB
cN ►a -P D
0 n�+n 1- 12/1 8'1 6'-O"MAX
f-O�� � 00 r 1
M/N
3,`r g O Z 1 A T. N o UI�'
% z Dt1lJ D o � rn� �i Nil
m n~O N - 7 0 03c °� DD gZ 0 cn
n S — ',';,,-112,
ti m LA 0 Q O z § _ 0 4ZZm = m
r o ,'m c� -I i p A m m a� Q o roe A L • ° T
—N m mmD71 -�(7
-' > � m 3 � D F
Z1 `w�, o D . g N' s pfd 0 m NNNO /mn D�
IV r �"'� Z D 5- X g n I re Z -I m220*
c)rn m
m N Pi.
s N'x H N . m t� n 8 N nWiniDm (n 5
y Z Z�o o n°� Z F � 0 �q'°'C0� >0 o
nom,, va za o,��N D� z
a) �' J BONN D
z
„;,,
.>,1
o w g
WA ...\l-----:. :: S '' wi,
.•
V, o
qa sp g j
r. N.,..
____, („D 1-3>
i 1 ---§,, C) : t Qi---”' . I '
> 11.3 , rz ..,fa. Fr_
um
Z 'R IV 0 , (--,,-i .-:„2
C7g ♦On F; z3 g`�.
D 8 i VJ o u 4y i; : -0 'c„
D .:\
x: _.
f 11417 Al Ig 5
VI
o y 3 e z
i;: E.:, :: IP- >1 ;,--f-.- \ ' --- ' ' *
cn
...'4,.- Pi --1
_ xo
AC i i'' ' ..........--...... .`R (lir' .1.: .:.:I:...........''', Ili ) .`' '''F,;.--1-k—T-1 ..relAlln 1
hiI ' ;.' '' m ''''''-'
ill K>
D as W
rr. .4.1 1
i4 m,-.., 1 i X :: '';' rt o al
,,,,,,
„ -a
oio -c'3 < n L-D
z o6
it o
rIg
C� -° C
�j m
- m
\
a
o
R,
'e, <,', „,,
S o
C) N
o
2
-
,u7.1
iiii ,,,
0 ›
. z_r, m1.i
(t...;D
CD 0
W ,,s.WN,, a=
O
T
CD
NT Milli
%M p
D 0 N O ,T1-§,' ma,
1- (n r- 9,6--
y it' ill
D
n vo
m — Boz o
-r In hi
rn- 3
r= /v
� it„,,,,,
o y2 ' !'
,..), LZ
U 111, _
D
o N W
v ,- m �I o
2 � of�
m 1 i
o-. g...-
r
A
2
O
r
p"9yles
_ mFv O If
C
`\ vxf
Z7 �J
0
4,,,,..„
1111 ZcmJ Do < w �y .gm0D c ;
:,
N, ^'
Z -o _ Q oa Qco O , 1111—z ,,--
m poonx O •�D
zfTl Z
ar-+
Ij
i� � 3,N y ?.,1 w n. r
gA �244\
3 2
Q tEl o<v m m-r mc' R ' jar!' oycp uc,-+ '
n2 .0:r-
n
F81
l; .r. -.
woo `'� B�I�g
m y ill
I
o C OR3 0'c?gi 1am ,c! �
rn
pOOmW '�3 N�I
o z
s r' mcg O�3 N (�j
c p0
D(7
° n~ D4
w n�izo'i A
in ��p 2�<J D o rn6 `4
rn m
o�e Z n y z0 a bib N = cu'n o 0 D 0 m C/J! Eni N rn CJ O)
i” O_cn G rn 2 ; N o O A O c o Oz O, n
n o -I OC 2 0 - --1 m m y m i N* m O m A ` *..r-.2z, =O
y �, COQ _ m -cc. w y r, i
A m m -+
"<w . q -< 3. N•r -Ei l J n'i nei N O m D
--Irn.... --:'
co r t O s- — , f'n '';1)
y m ��1 A 4t Foe,NDp u)cn
D — ,-1i- �Cti O a w
,, Z z ib O j a O Q. O 30..NN 0
'i' n:8 a_O I J 3 mONN CJ
e
7v wN 0000@00000000000000
vs A� wc_b b bb b b bb bb � Ob(nb cnb'+1 Alb Vfb bb bc�bc1 bb z vltn ba tn;b �
N z►v CO; O O O O T30 Z� O 2O�O wi 2 Al�p�p�O�2 Boz S "O O' II
Pa A32'O'2 Rl
1/1 to-6-30! z c^3 b b b b b b b D b a b "1 b b b z 2 ct c� b - A'C
O � O O O �O O -�O 00 O O.�b�5.
O O'b0 bn1 bn1 � �� H A���a� �Z
O v 1 cn oto N N -1n cn r*1 v1 0 P N�� )55.cq to .a s a s
�, Oo ?',3,b; �, �, �, �, -1r*1 i.;41 R1 �, �,a�1 0\o ab a^1\�,\-,\-+ \�, "� a�\-c .i\��
N N 2 O 2a O O pO a Aa as cO�Z az�O�O c�0 l7 c� 14. !� 2, a 2 �-t� +1
'' �+�,� c;,y � �- m ry -. cr 11E-23
ro yZ y����2�_°z�o°o � b °o ����'�°o N
8 o,,; z`a� �i 0 G.,�Iog g.z G -1 m p.oQ cx ok o 0 0A a oz 2 0
�O iy i N? i n (6',9,-� ra*1 2 O2 6 p.).?_- v N N2 tie A O1 g�' 2 N�
-0 Tl<-I el El zT 0 �� o o " ' z ,, o, b o�as-a Q a S a
(!)m o o , ' a c
D�-Im wz z a y b ,, `' �' c i c z i o� N
• "i <O ^ r O y R1 8 h O
Ow73 (
ZZI"-* 0 '' O n 11 66' , aj b O^7
A
z O � � 2 T2 , � O
0cDC-5 0 '3n1
2 y_
,,,,,,,:..,,,,_-•
,,-, 1,,,,,,\% ,
! . -.4.,%, \
r n ,00c ��� o,,, -„,.1.64z, o
p \
_______-- sii,...-
•
-iffir
.,,,zi• \
.rr��v��`►` Z100 1�5�9 ,y04 ®':;� �. ���UO el-
:.��\\ A .d.”,0' ; -0'0
i 3.19''' g c''' 0 di' i%
...'. °- '- --s 4' ti:, --\A::%.\ tA % -7 0 1,
-- -- '4 V x It, ce,): -i.iigii:4f,a E\ \-13 \ -0 'A'S,
m o' 7,.-- toN.IsiOto.,am �- "� \\ 4,�\ o� \♦ •-. 7j O/p
TitT,,,, A et \ — „0.. ,p
mob - '. �� '':•a© �t��������4®� <� '' /�c � \ CN' � ♦♦` �G•� GZO
g-g a \
© �.�. ,$r �. O / 0. O
'` CO . \ c) /o;'\,
' \".44,111,PG.w.� `"AVt.
t; `d'. ...,,, i). \.,:\. \ILL :\
11-'68-1 T� � '''0�"'&/rn) •:.:A.. ` est' '��', �`� �' \ v e\ 0
v '\ 1,,,,...........49.cn
O lie
,Q
%-:11,‘
3 D m '(\j.,.) `, 7 I- �,,#/.� ". r` m µm `� �y\.4\ ` \, • fi_ N. ��
A" R ( fr&`'n W,09 ir"..,... P-3 8 g .. ......,...Z..1, vit, \
,N, 0 *,\ • -,N-
D co ebb O\\ ®,� ` "� ® ��� \\nr 44 ���?gip "� ♦ ,�A� �`ro_
SDC°• 3 0.1.o0S --v ��a �=` �`�` ' / �� `���`n`� �S `d``' /
,,, ,. -if) -.....,. .\,,,,,...„_ ,,,,,,
,,,.
0
_ - 4.,,,„ ,.._:, . 1, ,..;‘.........,,,,,,
4,.m . zi 0**,40 .T, #1401::: . th 4,... ,4,44,,:y.:04A® .., ,
, st4ii .-..:04—crAthm.‘w Altle,Aziwooda . ,, \0 sz.,,x %,
'fI'' © j. � , ei
�#14. \, � 4401° 'tt)D fly\< © ::•,,:. -.ip 't --, %vt�
a' ,,,,,,-.44veko.,,,:00-,
#... ‘-,----.. ow ,:sottO b •
--***Vt" '!-''::4,- Cs\.. Notv,//),
0\ --‘v-..
. ''* \4ANN,-,-,,,\
E---;V;8 1*,4*" o C\-\ 0 Ai:'''.fo, ' - °)( 4t 8 P 4 0 \— \
nib .s::;1 ,.N -i S,;,' 21 t-,)_ \\\ \\0�0.,
C�
a, -.„.,:.,-:-5
,� b AA �� ^�N�N ppl0�-' y
• cu R
• i 73 \ jo
2 0411.' 41 ‘,/'-
i \ 1
.:-,o -_-_-:::>11°46- -
> \ ,_._--
0 41
__ -::::::::::::"/ /-,,ID w ,-.: -•.----w'41*---\- \ \ -
14,,0
4,Z •� e = I
.9Z IN :5_2‘,
).: . ___--
C fa -
500'44'49'E 264.94'4 ZV1 ••J
S00'40'00'E 265.00'�Rj �Z a, ,4 a''
‘ i.,
zm
NOWW°3
d2 �2tiyx b
GI oo2,m P „ J1.--,_
[[[2i-,yac' m
Nr+ yra m A� can . •i , g - #
n
w�o1., 8,-,,,,,,z ,i,_,,,,,, t, ya> /'*-
z
'-'4„,:-,*./
2'• 1'11 mi Vc�amy g �`• ..,o , \
A aim rn n oma" r \
', p o
,,1 vmi2 n2N 1,71 \ \\
o�'c� n-i 70 ` \
\........
a
A w -, 1F 1
0 c Q
m ;, ` w �-\ �N`NpZ CV
�Nd� �08H�i3N
PI 0 $6 �Sd�d�0 11Nn pppH
rn o�z t' g pir3N qpg
2 r nrt1n Age N r.
w .t3 mzo a
"n 61
:K W,r CAen C A r�
1R E -_12 k"
D 1 CJ D : $ rn 4`1 i
ppyy O Tm1w
m E-i o el
t I w D "°CA! A i.cD1 m n w
.,,,,2 z,r,,, cei . . -s >-om . g2 '23 55 .43 i Z#73.. r- ie-F.§i m =0*
'' .3�G, .3 f, -81;r6 E. N r 1 ' 1 Q Pei
�N r- m� )
nmr�.g 3I 2 CZm D? . z w g Pei C)
-.. _ � 1 r� �,w m � y
.'1' 1 D o ' HT1 No W Z S ►� $ O s 4'4'4, r 1
l
7E,- ®1010@®08 O OO O O 80 coli
iv 2iN
(n"ao_ b Sb cn n -p cn 4s b b to b��b b b v►O�trroy�b � ^
gi 00 tgi O ,i-130 O ^�1�0 O m�pbA iiO VI N.A r
'eta' .CPO O i2°4 O O O 'OA i ^1�O O°C?°?
ZI
't :4/11; o 7o�� 0 0 0 0 o o oo ob0 no o,o�$ ►� r0n ° pr n r PI�� O !1 > Li � � � N (� aay�r*I-cto y H�1n°f'1v' qv 'ANg ! ho c� N (i �x �rg o� '871 "cn
-O T►<-I w oo Ary "+ z 6 -, p z bO ti i O
D (n o ca-
m O o �bO�t i e 2 a t PC o R cn k g w° pC §
•-1 m m oaia ° C t �„� p$z � o
OQ7Om -Ai I i 1- 73 c� � 2 o m °aa I
d� i
z Nzn � rgi
0 \ 2 `" ? F tom3 tt ' ' Q
0�=� % c' '
\ '/,IL - -
G�77� 0 -
Lo 0 Z
a
0 0 \ /�� ,-- /fir// / = 1
O _ '
•
› \ \,. - 71j.,, '.!- \_,,, I ,
m ...7\, .1\ ,\ 1 .
m , ----‘----_----;--)- .....---..----/--,----- \ ----'-:;:z----1 \ '.,_,,,k. .
1-- o 1 ryd ::.\ , i; .I 6 ,
,-:„,„:::::::/-____- -----, ' , __,\_ i _..........„.;,..,,, ..,,,,,,.,,,,\:..,, \\
.......-- T _-_,-,"- / .-•--------- "I.' s\*A ` -2.,, • \
°I:J.,..1-o-ii," ....,‘,_, CI4.01..,,
___ _ POM \' \ N ..��. ..® `—a► ". \\\�\`♦ \ a I
° ---,•:••:,,,:0, -,,, ' i:1"**3"':, Ali \ k\\
--------3(11\11' .28"- - grL1V,'4.0fi...--6"e",WW1,-Y 44- *ASP/1 '-'1\::- ;I*03 ‘\ t'el\ \ •'''\\\
-,04,,,,t,-,m,,,44-,It •1?..1' g *'';.*.•774.
---- I.-Lt- CES'C'"-,' Ir'_, 17.4*:..: VA,--'-'-'-:•-7 .,_-NAN ti‘Ab, <(i
..,. ..00•Ws:....ezre-'_.2_1_. ----- -'*,:', • X4 .- <- : ' c• V.A, "k..." 1 \ . • -.0 0-p
4 �����, :ass;�,, .�� �\\\� ,,o 0„, , .::_.__ to, ),. It.00,, ...1,..0 0 v,i‘\ 1:,,, \,
---- ----7<\4' ” . ,Z7' #.6., ..0447A / •:-,1 '0' 0 I---
--\ i i all iMlio. : .... , ,t,\--, :—-;/P ,_,\
'\, � ce,_ 1----e,.�\ � r,r,v /,II:;,.., / ( .40 N.V.,h'zi. —( 49.%ID . � +\ \\\♦♦ o '0' ls,� . y24:_\\
1_i3 SO, Ali ' 4,- ,--.-."----- ,,,,, \--. ,__K---7 ,- No,/•,,,,,V. ‘ •_74, 2: *040 it, \ It.\ \ ,S, ‘:k,
,‘;2 —,-4" 4' / /- . P ------/ // /i -1 :iolialk, -fa'.-,',-,,,Oh,i r. 4,1 . 6,rt, \ 70, \ 6 •\\\
' '•--1V-r ,- // '/' g' % Acr,/ / *f'104'1'/A1 \ ‘00,4tA*20.40"4\> .4'4 .":"11)* \s 11- \'\
/I A, '‘, • 1//// ' I c;:i i'/,..,°' ,,,401ft'.&;/-li, ____.1:‘,.k.104:: -,02,t....._iiW,,,...,,10:4:0 ' '1.;f11'
\\\q•\,., \\\
C.Ii C --�T\ /Q,cn I+lo.. ! ( ����►/ i'17=:...;. yo Z..---7,......,' 4��'r�. � , .,,,� 4
-?Dj 2°2'71- i-,i8ri.E22, " \ 1 -1,04'I. / ' IP,S,.-M:t.,--„ Prii--*-*,,,....... .4, „„_ '4.- ‘..- 41*\ \ *Oi\\\ \\
,,,,
t,i
160
(Tl _� / '• / -,-,,
v J 11 `+�fv.. , o'�—�� e `oUi •...\........N.:*.
. \ \�� \ \\\,\\\`♦
00Nm—c, -`ro.o / /VI.'
, I / //in' .4 ' -- 1►°�:`� moDm `. Q• \:11L-1vp \\\\X N _ yo" I I J / 1 J( * �� c ›t+.4.,-.... ..., 1 ". w N II !`,,•� p,,� �► \\ J \\ \•{ N M In />(c)CI''''---k i, . iV; I '1�' �tj''.��``� Oc/ w o r �� *• A \`4311,\ \\ \\`.. ��
m ffrit,',
°° `yrs �♦ ` �'`" ....... "-W4,7
,r� � �'p m ` \ \'
el 4,,ogi,. ` /� . \�I,l / or it'•ri *AAl \ k i� � ( Iv _ � # c� m �
117:i4,-$ • "kV;A P 1C1,-,:k. \ \\
---' /1 4 ''7,',• \i W* AP0:44M •-•g:i-0..re4$441, -.4.4.',.".,E.0,01107.1 1.4410%;:(3 7. h,\` " '10.7%, \. Y
i " ' (/ 0 r • \;1- '-,•S'edk. 4-10:‘,. ,..1.4.7 . .'1"417'70 4,440( g*. kl' Vill. . \`4'* ' Pit,-', 1 \
1 / , ' %It \,
(iiiio
LS
4i.*. ' 11:4' .*I.::L.: , •,„. ... ',\ • ,ni r.), .:::**1;Vs. 'P :\Nt
\\ !?Afgeii,--a .1.'I' 0/401'
TO:4- , '411/0 ' c,.• 411P ' -
4_, .4:‘_ 4*,.:'7 h• '' ,.. - _ : \ ' 43 \,_ -,...,,A, ,,,,
•
8-2 ' orl
�\ 0\
,,,,-,
-.,:.,.
R „A„ mrn !� N ` ` -•is
;• \ \
I\ \\ \\ \\.\ c,•....,....\ \ ':,,7 w - _` ,, \
,,,\ ,.
\ ..., fil:.. \,-, \-- Qjv / m \\ \ N,...: ik \ \0 \
v. \. , \,\. \ \ s. iw `,, \ 5, N a \\ 4 l \\ IV ---^pZ i m \,+Q40N ' . N ( N Z % ,Ir\, ,, ' 4�� \ ,'---C( \\ \/. \' is _ Z \ Q' \•• 1 ... . \�-_ ? -, \
NI'
\ \
\yc
v 0 ,i _#... :,-, _dc,0,-... ...;,,,ow ..,,,,,Ama,=--„:,-...-- -.....4..-- ii,,,„,\v\, , .
,_ .4., 1 ,_, , ,N ,. . . - . k „2...-;04,-_.....-.40ogir-,04.- ---4!—____—--_-___ 0 -ir fiN \1
o ___I__-___---.4,,,,-7.
_� '
;;lk ,-- ig 4--''''-'------•'""'""".." eya.-__ 4- ,,, / *.'',--------1 .ti, tiN...) 7'-----iit,-
-�/^\ .--�` o) •Z SQf7''0�•. 2;:r
•'..77 \\ A
\` _\ \ // )11::
l�\-- ` a \_� L� �. . \ \\''i- 0 9--
4 •• --- �- ` \ ` \\ \\ \\\ i y°:.4I Fel/ d+6��/ g J 1- �--- - v' `I1,i
/ n r \ .c.-••- ...„7,f,,1,7,, •C. moi-_ �♦
m \ �� \� N '� M \��� 8�I- � '/'- V-#1.
e _ 1\
1 2 : ov �c \ rod �\ \O NN \\ •`e. $ 7r�j..
So.„ ,`2Q' 1 '/__-' 141...--,=-4---,,-_I=.J
w ay c,.1r2:m k=%43; �. � \ I , O ( v 'F` ,. / ',.:.,/,-51.' ,--14 \-
we o2 cia. �"'�' '\ 1\ L, _ / lip� ( rn/-�i�.' '.� /�� 'pc.�
f,-',- ,3 O azyn 1 � / / . \ \ Otn•��1 �c�amrn / I' C\ \ isL . / //_ ,' '/' / � \- • \d \ k)•-)G1
xr rrZ. w .y11 vci m \ \ r /, ,/ SI/Ill- / / \\ \41,
rI / , / in
m v 'i nmy m - \ 1- =,J // LV / �-1' \\\ (1,�
O 47 coyer MI `1 \ '^�_,n_" :" ^'l/ / / O \- \ O
'/ �.
�a wRiti - /� \ J
•„,o 0NINOZ N
m H-+ a "..74,, O 9'"°
' , -., 1_ 1 �, ososS\n oH�Nd� aooH ��N
d �IN�
0 00 t m8 ">‘9 Id-1d
. fil 09 .0 d ,
M b b :I
< o-z w�a � z o
,�,�� � N t� s I
\ O r•
a nI 2 0
115i
,,,,...0., ce. 1
iii g 2 a, �w —.
ME n-c o W 4' 1 t3 1 p c m_ �ci,� FYw �C1�V♦ °>i" Z ov,�'a C rn ; N < D o - N 0 oln
P. yam o. to ''_ �r . m. m )-1. m fmmD� �n
--1 rya ica Nr � 0 3 N N N O m-D-�m Z D C7 1 1 n '7 OOZ� 2,m a m
= t'.tea, K N p . m p $ O P a Dm 0
m
m ' Z , -Zi a 3 mSNN D
$i'xrl'
pctit':p
-DTI_= va"X rc,.?�`"o
vZ
0DO� coa,!�z � az ,i;',
-I-< 'Oav2 w �`�
Ni O m t- !'n"�rn �+�� i dna v E
OCAZTI <� ,,,,„„ .q(_,,,, 01 2
�*1 O
v• rqd
CAD �4��#� \ 9/L 1 ��
O/
"1./4
ul o> Il0 r
co0Zi \0 0 .:6:e \ \ � 5,
13 1
D 0...." , __ ,\ s ✓ I /
\ l ,\ 1 17 r...71
o
rn
rg .z,,..2. , A.0‘-'-----.*\0i\''-\>', • t i..., .:'EQ z ,
o,of /�'•"'� �� \ \\\ ♦ ca ..1
__ /,.;fit o�� 2 �5� \\�° P`. 8 C�
s,-, _______-,,-,oceaQ0014\; ,t,J,✓18�1 f3 eve �u,' \, ,\\\♦ i
--------- SC1" ---____-,-,'-it41%.'W...'41001- ° r.i2 , cr-_,' V.A:a '‘ 44. sek\
__.,,-------jo„....--- -- -11-mikt.f0!*;c".kair-'-',=-1,'rri --MA VI\ .'\,\' \ <,
---------,- ----'---- ......"1 ---4011 cz:v Itii ,.Fi Vto '\____-4" i IRA \s',..,,„_,i,,,\ \ ,_ \\ < -s--7
,..,--------'- 7"---_,. -----_,, _dz.'', ' q., ' -.' IA, \ t- 'NS V \ " Ni. 2,0 0
--,..........------.... - giv • riiiii'llioilliliC......i,..:1.00.....- ,..7....„. ,,
.5.-0, \..lip .1:4 ' ( ili tp\'\\\N, -.0 -A-5-
..,_,. ,,,„,:--- . . ,, ._, . .,.______N * .4., ...,
-§.. \Ilk \-P‘w\'\ -7--- 0
' il, 111 :.,,ot,,-_,,..._---am%_ o‘ - :„;, A -0-,,./V148 Lgli, *K,,'''''' \ti 1‘t \\\‘'.. ,---- ---' 0
,� °�2;1'N.. 1..0"1
- „e-c.. ..._./, ,--.% xA ,-;:)).k � �' '�►'� r\4� \�\ °° GSC
A '44> • .\,st \V: \,$VN.N
- 41. ,-c" :---- TI:i 2- ' 44,‘-');
),,,':it , ,..•.4.4.. N'' "61 l' \ -51 \II'
—/ //,1242,,,,40-'40
z 1,—,\\1,\\\,
t -sot>0 > O\ o,•,,e " ;. Z an ✓ ,,,, 4.-, r*,z O aM 2, °, A `
z,---nl%, 0 iplikileN\ ,:, ♦
., ; k y .)?, -
' ) 1 k.)
--OV) Z •msO; ,�lS" MOt ,oi.{a 4 ® \\s*� � , •T , r �k .. ,� 4 F.;,i,,• O UR iri:4,\ \
\\\°
CJO
ONm-W,-.*V f ), ' i :: � � ` a v ° -.o is
` \\\\\° i„,,,-'
. ,)cn - "irI ( .fiiA �� °°amt rn v ,, k • tik\ \\\
`
-,,L. ;-.(No)-- ...,k,. d r ifl f 11 / .otea,_:..:::„`....:- g ,,.8 F„rj, ..,z§ % 8 i 0,0 '*'.4,'0,`‘,_1% k‘ \--'''_„ ,'
z fit'X
� . `I `\��\''......1.1 ....- c , `fi , . �vv �—I D a a: a
46
N , Z
lf ,, i
/ VI 9 1-- V`44,4,.. ^ 4..,'..\,..... ,:- 4014 40 1,0, \ \
0. -,:2 „7„, ' .4* 4,\ r,,,i,. .,„,,,
,,,,,,,,
4,Mz / 4- <1.°0•\* , ki,t' *14'''' ......\,. -* 4.4.41.....-4:0V44., 0444, ...- 1 ,sa, c„„,,,,, .
,,, 0 __ „sir Iii, :,:.„..4.\.,_,, ....._,r,,,, 4,......,.......,,,„0„404140t. _ ,.....82-.. -
4, �,, I\t.A i omwN,
„.!(c)v,\./ 4-1,ii/ 0 1 \
,/ ts`4,0.'' i 4.7%,,N---0.1..--;:z-,4,:ir ,att, ...v .dift tv,rm.,. .,.1).,0e,,,a .,--,i4t,,--...:„\ \,‘ ,i,
ri ' iik 0 \ 06....,r 4-0ft \i, . -w,:ex.-4,40 ,t-L.,N•r &--4-1A ._ ,-- -c,gap:;.(-,,,- <_N,
,____, , , . , („,::4:09k so. .0•8 --,---41. „Ago Iv: 44#\ '' ' °I IP VA \ \
( A ,, -,,,,,,,'.' 4:. „dr' SIPA ..:::.1.:. \i',$, e-,zth‘,„: I' 01** Att.ap '4i Pg 17,11- \
\ '4 * .\ - w 100. .000 AW -,!..g?.*:§..':' \-**:4pitt g ril 1;,:0,r?,2 g: a 14 8' \:\
)\\eaM- ' \-1014 4•411° 40 P,,), Aoliti ' r8f7, 241§ -"f:
11 1 l'i r5::'4X. -dr. rlIC“. • „ \\\\
i .::. 10 \ • , 0. 4,..
(\ . .4vii. . 100: - ,,ai. r_ , .P.7',' k A;' 1 rr",)4.^;.(4,1 s•-
---''' W\
-'I 4
3;,a r, .
- ,\ ‘\\
-N, w ------,---- < <,, ,, <•v,3,1 -y fO^1 ,fit 7-//..77--_, `
I ' r • ' • . Wk.., •, -----* W."1"":;§ ''i '1i,'' 'Pn —
,i , *114 _.,.,,-- ..._._.__---------A---k‘_-lmvr- -,.. . I ci''. 4 tr---< 7-,,—\_\v• ' N\ \
s.
,s,\
___,_.-_1__.-._=_._-.---`._,4%4,\_\_\_
____7,„ —_til`^' ( ..N.•
• \ v ,4.00....}.,.,,.-, / 2 Obi sr.,- N
u1ii
1 __...:
. si_
rg - ,.---,----- --,
,,--c. .-----
=-
,,- ,,,. — .-- _. ,...._/_____,,, >
. ___ --
z- \
_ ___.
�' - ow .,--- ' --,,..161F.) ��\ __r- r r1�--,, /�� /� c_--._.i j \JJ /✓/J/r '-
c i
/- ( \ sem-''�� 'V ,j i d d ''' -- : .1�..�- ,..,.,
-
\;\ i /''. ,,•-" 4' , , r/,-:,-----.41-Z.---_--- ___NER i
./-..,-.. -.4\, „ , ' 0
Nk (I
, \\‘ 11\ / --7, , ,,kt -- ,
. I. - ,-Z ' / 0 2---, ''''' ....'.- " t
F —
..., 1.:::,, i ----- li ...,
. __:, _ ,-'7 ( r,//
//Ai ,
y 2 ,
--\• , A
10\ t, \
' ' 7,i1,-------- --..---_%/ y / -' , ----\\ ° ‘ 1 l' 7'-'
-;."1 t,ti 'et 1_. _- --, \\,-:-- -- 77>---•-; /
:1
"• u.,;.•" --h____ _ -- `\ -/<,-/,/ db1 �I�r
."416.0s.--.1114 - ,--- _ \ ilk,c ,\
r 4--%----11111. 1 (‘-' ) �. w \, 91\1 O HONd 8 013N
0S01S1n 11N() L 000H�08H
T 09
'06 'g-7 •-- ldld0
00
o (-Q � 8$f
it
1- m vN §€�
�
C�� 0� N 6118
' -SIgizic9) , •
$P ,Q'o 2 v ° yp 6 1
S N p �41
�� m nyz>I� m � � oQ o V� gee 'o Eiro DD♦/1 �
• .92„-.m2
�Dff�����11 N �g Vlt o D yC�O.�4A = ���// $
I, 2 iia ,,,, # N° �� p Q O `j O 14 r =O�
PI
_�p tt�=�44 ail -1 z r y i Al m 'P'
` frn m Z n
to ``"m Dm 3 E L. n 0 3NN,o rn›
�j p m
�, Tar r 3
Z n�q a CP! p 0-. D� Z
/tom a.G� r 3 aSNN D
Attn: Town of Oro Valley Town Clerk
Please send a copy of this document
to the Mayor and each Council
Member, Town Manager
Chuck Sweet and Chief Sharp.
To: Town of Oro Valley Council Members
From: Fraternal Order of Police and O.V.P.O.A.
'i I t It l 4'4 TOV
Subject: Pay and Benefits Requests for the Oro Valley Police DepartI nt
The Fraternal Order of Police and O.V.P.O.A. have worked together in a cooperative
effort to create a list of pay and benefit issues for presentation to the Town Council. We
respectfully requests these issues be considered for this year's Meet and Confer meeting
with the police department. Below is a partial list of important issues identified and
compiled from the sergeants and officers of the police department. All 70 non-command
sworn officers responded to this survey conducted to identify these issues.
• Increase Contribution/Public Safety Retirement
• Contract
• Retire Benefits—Medical, Dental and Vision
• Pay Raises
• 3 Hour Callout Overtime Minimum
• Stability Pay
• Increase in Vacation Time
• Meet and Confer Ordinance
• Pay Incentives—Education, Expertise in Language
• Cost of Living Increase
The top priorities identified by the sworn officers and sergeants of the department
were identified as:
1. Retire Benefits—Medical, Dental and Vision
2. Pay Raises
3. Cost of Living Increase
4. Increase Contribution/Public Safety Retirement
5. Contract
We respectfully request an official notification to both officer associations of the
official meet and confer date. We have appointed two representatives from each
association to represent the department in the upcoming meetings and negotiations.
Thank you for your consideration.
Kevin Mattocks